The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About02-12-24-SWSMayor: David Grant lt Councilmembers: -AEN HILLS Brenda Holden Emily Rousseau Special City Council Work Tena Monson Tom Fabel Session Agenda February 12, 2024 5:00 P.M. City Hall Address: 1245 W Highway 96 Arden Hills MN 55112 Phone: 651-792-7800 Website: www.cityofardenhills.org City Vision Arden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long-standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play. This meeting is open to the public and members of the public can attend in -person at City Hall or can access the meeting remotely by joining via Zoom (see Public Inquiries/Informational below for instructions) This meeting will be streamed live on local Cable Channel 16 and available for playback on our website. CALL TO ORDER 1. PUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL Members of the public are invited to remotely monitor the City Council meeting via Zoom using the below link. Members are also welcome to provide public comments during this section of the agenda via Zoom. Members wishing to provide public comment must use the "raise hand" feature in Zoom to identify themselves as wanting to make a public comment and will be called upon to provide their public comment during this portion of the agenda. Those that speak must state their name and address for the record. HTTPS://US02WEB.ZOOM.US/J/89988410535 *Please make sure you have the most up-to-date version of Zoom to participate in the meeting* This is an opportunity for citizens to respectfully bring to the Council's attention any items which are relevant to the City. In addressing the Council, you must first state your name and address for the record. Comments shall be limited to three (3) minutes or less. Written documents or other materials should be handed to the City Clerk for distribution to the Council prior to or during the meeting. Council will generally not respond at the same meeting where an issue is initially raised by a member of the public but the Council may refer the issue to staff for further research and possible report or action at a future Council meeting. 2. RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIES 3. AGENDA ITEMS 3.A. Rice Creek Commons/TCAAP Commercial Zoning Discussion Dave Perrault, City Administrator Documents: MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF 3.B. Sale Of City -Owned Parcel At 1450 Highway 96 Jessica Jagoe, Community Development Director Documents: MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF 3.C. MCES Private 1/1 Grant Program - Equity Component David Swearingen, Public Works Director/City Engineer Documents: MEMO.PDF 3.D. City -Owned Land Encroachment Discussion David Swearingen, Public Works Director/City Engineer Documents: MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF 3.E. City Attorney Discussion Dave Perrault, City Administrator Documents: MEMO.PDF 35. Virtual Meeting Options Dave Perrault, City Administrator Documents: MEMO.PDF 3.G. Rice Creek Commons/TCAAP Discussion Dave Perrault, City Administrator Documents: MEMO.PDF 3.H. Council Tracker/Council Priorities Dave Perrault, City Administrator Documents: MEMO.PDF 4. COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS ADJOURN ,-4 DEN HILLS MEMORANDUM DATE: February 12, 2024 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Dave Perrault, City Administrator SUBJECT: RCC Commercial Zoning Discussion Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount 10a Council Should Consider N/A AGENDA ITEM — 3A Funding Source: N/A Council should discuss the current state of commercial zoning and future planning of land uses at the Rice Creek Commons (RCC), aka TCAAP. Background At a previous worksession, Council discussed the commercial zoning on RCC and requested Staff bring back commercial developers to discuss what can be done to encourage the most desirable commercial development on RCC. Specifically, the Council was focusing on the west side of the spine road, which allows for Mixed Use Retail, Office Mixed Use, and Flex Office. It should be noted the southwest corner was recently converted from flex office uses to residential. 1� Mid Use RetailW# Office Mixed Useo Flex Office Page 1 of 3 The panel for the discussion will start off with each panelist giving a brief introduction, and then be asked to briefly give their thoughts on the current state of the market. Following introductions, an open-ended discussion between Council and the developers is expected. Commercial discussion panel includes: • Nicholas Roberts, Roberts Group • Phil Cattanach, United Properties • Alatus Representative (TBD) During their preliminary discussion, Council raised items such as limiting warehousing in the Flex Office, limiting the size of retail buildings, and refining building materials. Below are highlights of the items previously raised, Council did not give specifics on what it would like to see changed: Building Materials The below excerpt gives an idea of what building materials may be used in the commercial areas of RCC, while there are additional provision beyond these, this highlights what would generally be applicable: (a) On Pedestrian Priority and Pedestrian Friendly Frontages, primary building structures shall have a minimum of sixty percent (60%) of the following primary building materials- (i) Masonry (individual brick, stone, cast stone, etc_ that is mortared in place) (b) On General Frontages, primary building structures shall have a minimum of forty percent (40%) of the following primary building materials- (i) Masonry (individual brick, stone, cast stone, etc that is mortared in place) (c) Secondary materials shall only be used for up to forty percent (40%)of the primary building fa4ade for Pedestrian Priority and Pedestrian Friendly frontages_ On General Frontages, secondary materials may be used for up to sixty percent (60%) of the primary building fa4ade_ (i) Secondary materials include- 1 _ Architectural metal with matte finish 2 Cementitious fiber 3_ Exterior Insulation Finish System (EIFS), on all frontages shall not be used on the ground floor level_ Use of EIFS is limited to ten percent (10%) per total fa4ade area- 4- Stucco utilizing a 3-step process of application- 5- Engineered wood Retail Building Size There is not a provision in the code today that limits the size of retail buildings. At the previous meeting, it was discussed trying to regulate big box (>80,000 sq/ft) versus smaller retailers (<80,000 sq/ft). Council may want to discuss with the panel on restricting size of retailers, what that would do about potential interest or is it better to leave the code as is and not dictate building size. Page 2 of 3 Warehousing Currently, warehousing is only allowed in the Flex Office as an accessory use to manufacturing and processing, and a minimum must still be thirty percent office. Regarding the allowed uses, the full land use table can be found under Attachment A, generally the three districts are similar in what they allow; however, there are some differences, which are highlighted below. This table represents commercial land use, industrial uses (manufacturing and processing) are only allowed in the Flex Office with certain criteria. Manufacturing and processing is where you would find possible warehousing. Commercial Land Use Office Mixed- Use Retail Mixed -Use Flex Office Cocktail Lounge P P -- Commercial Recreation — Indoor -- -- P Dog Kennel -- -- P Dry Cleaning/Laundry — Pick-up or Self -Service -- P -- Liquor Store -- P -- Microbrewery P P Microdistillery P P Mortuary -- -- P Research and Development Facility P -- P Retail Sales and Service P/C P P Service Station -- P/C P/C Studio -- P P Vehicle Sales P/C -- P/C Following tonight's discussion Council may want to direct Staff on bringing back more information or scheduling future worksession discussions. Budget Impact N/A Attachment Attachment A — Approved Land Use Table Page 3 of 3 Attachment A TCAAP Proposed Regulating Plan Campus Commercial xed Use Retail - We Flex Business Civic Water Infrastructure Open Space A Open Space B NR -1 N R -2 Open Space NR -1 N R -2 N R -3 IL Open Space N R -3 IM N R -4 TC-1 TC-2 TC-3 ;rjOpen Space es N R -3 NR-4 ETotal 11.4 Maximum Residentia Units 369.9 Gross Density Maximum Residential Units Zone Gross Density Range Acreage Maximum Units NR-1 0.00 - 1.98 13.1 26 Creek NR-2 2.50 - 4.05 23.7 96 Subtotal 36.8 122 NR-1 0.00 - 2.52 29.8 75 NR-2 2.50 - 3.45 27.8 96 Hill NR-3 4.00 - 5.60 24.5 137 Subtotal 82.1 308 NR-3 4.00 - 5.66 18.6 108 NR-4 4.00 - 21.0 8.7 183 Town TC-1 0.00 - 68.16 1.8 120 Center TC-2 0.00 - 67.02 6.9 460 TC - 3 0.00 - 41.64 7.2 300 Subtotal 43.6 1171 NR-3 4.00 - 5.66 21.0 119 South West NR-4 5.00 - 21.0 11.4 240 Subtotal 32.4 359 Total 194.9 1960 Approved July 13, 2015 Revised December 12, 2016 Amended June 26, 2023 5.0 Schedule of Permitted Uses 5.1 Applicability: General use categories have been identified by Zoning District (Table 5-1). Uses that are not listed are prohibited. Uses that are allowed as accessory uses may only remain in conjunction with an active principal use. Table 5-1: TRC Zoning District Land Use Table N M N c`9 m 0 0 0 0 N 'v Zoning O O O O 0. m y 0 4) W s s -E s Additional District V _ k �° �° -0 -00 v Requirements Z Z ~ ~ Z ~ Z Uses Sub -District TC-1 TC-2 TC-3 NR- NR- NR- NR- 1 2 3 4 Bed & Breakfast P P P P/C P/C P/C P/C See Table 5-2 Home Occupation: A A A A A A A Class I Large Multi- Family P/C P/C P/C See Table 5-2 Live/Work P P P Medium Multi- P/C P/C P/C See Table 5-2 Family Assisted Living, Memory Care P/C P/C See Table 5-2 and Skilled Nursing Residential Facility P/C P/C P/C P/C P/C P/C P/C See Table 5-2 Senior Independent P/C P/C P/C P/C P/C See Table 5-2 Living Single Family P P P Small Lot SF I I I I I P I P Residential Small Multi- I I I I I P/C I P/C See Table 5-2 FamiAL Automotive P/C P/C P/C See Table 5-2 Washing Brewpub P P P P P P P Business P P P P P P P service Clinic, medical P P P P P P P office Club, sports & A P J_�_� P P P P P __ I fitness Section 5: Schedule of Permitted Uses TCAAP Redevelopment Code Page 1 30 Approved July 13, 2015 Revised December 12, 2016 Amended June 26, 2023 Table 5-1: TRC Zoning District Land Use Table Cl) CV M N a a d -a -0 M d y V o 0 0 0 Zoning a m 0 0 4) s -E " Additional District E _ x -0 .0 -0 -0 Requirements U0i3 o 0) 0) 01 0 o V0 ~ u_ ~ ~ Z Z Z Z Uses Sub -District TC-1 TC-2 TC-3 NR- 1 NR- 2 NR- 3 NR- 4 Cocktail P P P P P P Lounge * Permitted as Commercial an accessory Off -Street P/C* P/C* P/C* P/C`: P/C' P/C* P/C* use with a Parking primary building only Commercial recreation - P P indoor Daycare P P P P P P P Facility Daycare, family - 10 or P P P P P P less * Completely Dog kennel P* enclosed; no outside runs Drive -Up P/C P/C P/C P/C See Table 5-2 Windows Dry cleaning & laundry, P P P P P pick-up station Dry cleaning & laundry, P P P P P self-service laundry Financial Institution & P P P P P P P service Food P P P P P P P Preparation Hotel/ motel P P P P P P P Liquor Store P P P P P Microbrewery P P P P P P Microdistillery P P P P P P Mortuary, funeral home -- -- -- -- -- -- P/C See Table 5-2 Office I P I P I P I P I P I P I P Personal P P P P P P P services Pet Services P P P P P P P Section 5: Schedule of Permitted Uses TCAAP Redevelopment Code Page 1 31 Approved July 13, 2015 Revised December 12, 2016 Amended June 26, 2023 Table 5-1: TRC Zoning District Land Use Table M ( V CI)CV a a d d y 0 0 0 0 Zoning a y y E -E E Additional District E c c c x -0 .0 -0 -0 iJ Requirements UO o 0 o 21 2) V ~ ~ ~ LLLM Z Z Z Z Uses Sub -District TC-1 TC-2 TC-3 NR- NR- NR- NR- 1 2 3 4 Research and development P P P facility Restaurant and P/C P/C P/C P/C P/C P/C P/C See Table 5-2 restaurant fast-food Retail sales & P P P P P/C P P See Table 5-2 service Service Station A/C P/C P/C See Table 5-2 Storage, exterior -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Studio P P P P P P Theater, indoor P P Vehicle — motorized, P/C P/C See Table 5-2 leasing and rentals Vehicle — motorized, P/C P/C P/C See Table 5-2 service ;A/C Antenna or P/C P/C P/C P/C P/C P/C P/C See Table 5-2 Tower Club or lodge P P P P P P (non-profit) Community P P P P Center House of worship P P P P P P Library P P P P P P P P Municipal P P P P P P P Building Park Facilities P P P P P P P P P (Public) School, general P P P P education School, specialized P P P P P education Section 5: Schedule of Permitted Uses TCAAP Redevelopment Code Page 1 32 Approved July 13, 2015 Revised December 12, 2016 Amended June 26, 2023 Table 5-1: TRC Zoning District Land Use Table ir CV M (V CI)V a a d d y 0 0 0 0 Zoning a0 y y Additional District E c c c x -0 .0 -0 -0 0 Requirements Ua o 0 o 21 2) V ~ ~ ~ LL Z Z Z Z Uses Sub -District TC-1 TC-2 TC-3 NR- NR- NR- NR- 1 2 3 4 Theater, performing P P P P arts center I Garage, Truck Manufacturing Warehousing & processing: P/C P/C permitted as an Class accessory use Manufacturing & processing: Class II *Equipment shall be screened to not be seen from Utility any public right Substation of way and shall not be placed in the front of any parcel Warehousing A/C A/C Adult - Oriented Businesses Section 5: Schedule of Permitted Uses TCAAP Redevelopment Code Page 1 33 Approved July 13, 2015 Revised December 12, 2016 Amended June 26, 2023 5.2 Additional Use Criteria: All uses listed as P/C in Table 5-1 shall also meet the following standards in Table 5-2. Table 5-2 Additional Use Criteria Table Use Zoning District Location & Design Criteria Residential Uses Neighborhood No more than six(6) rentable rooms permitted. Shall be owner -occupied. Bed & Breakfast Parking shall be placed behind the building, or screened from view of the public right-of-way. Assisted Living, Memory Care or Skilled Nursing Town Center Buildings with Pedestrian Priority or Pedestrian Friendly Frontage shall be Large Multi -Family required to include ground floor commercial uses for a minimum of fifty Medium Multi -Family percent (50%) of their street frontage as measured in linear feet. Senior Independent Living Assisted Living, Memory Care or i. Homes shall be designed as either a collective of single-family or Skilled Nursing Neighborhood duplex homes to fit the scale of the surrounding development. Senior Independent Living ii. These homes may also be mixed with mixed -generational housing. Town Center i. Residential Facility shall be licensed by the State of Minnesota; and ii. Residential Facility shall serve no more than sixteen (16) residents at any given time. Residential Facility I. Residential Facility shall be licensed by the State of Minnesota; Neighborhood ii. Residential Facility shall serve no more than six (6) residents at any given time. i. Parking shall be placed against an alley or in the rear of the lot and be screened from the public right-of-way. Small Multi -Family Neighborhood ii. Entrances To units that are not accessible from the front entries may have access from the rear or the side of the building. Commercial Uses Automotive Washing i. Automotive drive through lanes, service bays, and/or gas station Vehicle —motorized, leasing Office Mixed -Use canopies shall meet the design standards in Section 7, Building Design and rentals Flex Office Standards of this code. Vehicle- motorized, service Retail Mixed -Use ii. Outdoor storage of vehicles or other products sold shall NOT have direct frontage along Pedestrian Priority Streets. Outdoor storage of vehicles and/or other products sold shall be screened with a required Service Station Campus Commercial street screen along Pedestrian -Friendly Streets and General Streets g Y Retail Mixed -Use (see Section 10 for standards). Flex Office i. New surface parking lots shall be permitted as an interim use only in Campus Commercial the case of phasing. ii. Applications for new surface lots shall include in -fill building concepts Town Center on the lot with a site plan that meets the build -to -zone and building Commercial Off -Street Parking Office Mixed -Use frontage standards of the specific character zone. Retail Mixed -Use iii. New surface parking shall be set back a minimum of thirty feet (30') Flex Office from the edge of the right-of-way of Pedestrian Priority Streets. iv. New surface parking shall not be located at a street intersection (of any Pedestrian Priority and Pedestrian -Friendly Streets only) for minimum of thirty feet (30') from the intersection along each street. i. Pick-up and drop-off lanes, storage of vehicles, service areas, and drive through facilities shall NOT have direct frontage along Pedestrian Mortuary, funeral home Flex Office Priority Streets. ii. All such areas along other streets shall be screened with a required street screen (see Section 10 for standards). Campus Commercial Drive -Up Windows Retail Mixed -Use Drive through or drive -up facilities shall meet the design standards in Flex Office Section 7, Building Design Standards of this code. Office Mixed -Use Section 5: Schedule of Permitted Uses TCAAP Redevelopment Code Page 1 34 Approved July 13, 2015 Revised December 12, 2016 Amended June 26, 2023 Table 5-2 Additional Use Criteria Table Use Zoning District Location & Design Criteria Campus Commercial Restaurant and Restaurant, Fast Town Center Office Mixed -Use Six (6) queuing spaces per drive -through menu board. Food Retail Mixed -Use Flex Office L Retail sales and service uses may not comprise more than ten percent (10%) of the total gross square footage of building space within the Office Mixed -Use District. ii. Accessory retail uses associated with medical office clinics, including but Retail sales and services Office Mixed -Use not limited to pharmaceutical and corrective lens sales, shall not be counted towards the maximum square footage of retail sales and service uses permitted in the Office Mixed -Use District, but may not exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the gross square footage of the building in which they are located.. Civic Uses Campus Commercial Town Center Office Mixed -Use i. Located on top of a building or architectural component only. Antenna or Tower Retail Mixed -Use ii. Shall conform to additional design and location requirements for antennas and towers included in Section 1 325 of the AHC. Flex Office Industrial Uses Manufacturing and Processing: Campus Commercial For buildings where manufacturing and processing are a principal or Class I Flex Office accessory use, a minimum of thirty percent (30%) of the gross building square footage must be in office use. Warehousing is only allowed as an accessory use to Manufacturing and Warehousing Campus Commercial Processing. For buildings where warehousing is an accessory use, a minimum Flex Office of thirty percent (30%) of the gross building square footage must be in office use. Section 5: Schedule of Permitted Uses TCAAP Redevelopment Code Page 1 35 AGENDA ITEM — 3B ,-ARZEN HILLS MEMORANDUM DATE: February 12, 2024 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Dave Perrault, City Administrator FROM: Jessica Jagoe, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Sale of City Owned Parcel at 1450 Highway 96 Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A Council Should Consider the Following The City Council should discuss and provide direction on selling the City owned parcel at 1450 Highway 96 which was the former City Hall site. Background At the end of last year, the City was contacted by Matt Alexander with North Shore Development Partners regarding interest in purchasing the City owned parcel at 1450 Highway 96 (Attachment A). Mr. Alexander shared with city staff information about their company and recent development projects that they've completed in adjacent communities. In addition, he provided a sketch site plan illustrative of a scenario for a residential townhome development on the Highway 96 city owned parcel. Staff directed Mr. Alexander that he would need to make a request to City Council for discussion on interest in selling the city owned parcel. This 6.82 acre vacant parcel was the former site of the old city hall which was demolished in 2009. After the relocation of City Hall, this site has been discussed several times with regards to options for future development such as residential townhomes, commercial town offices, and other civic uses. One of those options being a potential site for a future Public Work Maintenance Building which the Public Works Director still considers a possible consideration. It is Staff's understanding that in recent years Council has not identified its preferred plan or vision for the future of the vacant site. Page 1 of 2 The parcel is zoned NB, Neighborhood Business District and is guided in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan towards Neighborhood Business. The following are the purpose statements identified in the zoning code for the NB Zoning District: A. To be located at the edge of residential neighborhoods. B. To provide a limited range of over-the-counter, convenience, retail, and service uses to accommodate the needs of the adjacent residents. C. To place limitations on the type, size and intensity of uses within this district, given its proximity to residential uses. D. To place emphasis on convenience for pedestrian, bicycle, and public transportation access to the use. E. To accommodate, where possible, a public commons giving residents a place to gather and interact with one another. F. To ensure adequate buffering is provided on these sites for the adjacent residential uses. G. To require, where applicable, compliance with the City's gateway requirements. The NB guiding language in the comprehensive plan states "neighborhood business designates small, isolated areas for neighborhood commercial land uses when they are compatible with surrounding residential uses. Commercial uses that are high traffic generators, noise generators, or otherwise not compatible with residential neighborhoods, are inappropriate. Typically, Neighborhood Business areas will be located on intersections or nodes that are on the edge of residential areas, are less desirable sites for housing, or have traditionally been occupied with neighborhood services. Dwelling units of three (3) to nine (9) units per acre may be permitted. The expected share of uses within this area are as follows: 0% to 100% Retail; 0% to 100% Office; and 0% to 50% Residential. A development intensity of up to 0.7 FAR may be allowed." For the work session discussion, North Shore Development Partners has submitted a preliminary concept sketch plan with a rendering and floor plan of a possible residential townhome development on this parcel (Attachment B). They are seeking City Council feedback on interest to sell this parcel. If the Council is interested in moving forward with this discussion, city staff would schedule a second discussion for a future work session and include as part of that memo a full history of the parcel as well as the next steps for sale of city owned land. Next Steps Staff is looking for Council direction as to whether or not there is interest in selling the city owned parcel at 1450 Highway 96. Should Council want to consider selling the site, it may chose to deal directly with any party or open up the site to offers from all interested parties. Budget Impact N/A Attachments A. Property Location Map B. Requestor Narrative Page 2 of 2 Highway 96 City Owned Lot � Attachment A EL S. Rolm , r. Hf I L Li M I a I =1 lit bfflh.. 44 Jill I lilt) . . . . . . . . . . "M oil 'Off FE DO 0 A Not 2/5/2024, 3:27:56 PM Override 1 Cities Personal Property County Offices Tax Parcels 1-8,000 0 0.05 0.1 0.2 mi 1, ,, 1 1 - -1, 1 0 0.1 0.2 0.4 km Ramsey County Ramsey County MN Attachment B Arden Hills - former City Hall property Development Proposal Background North Shore Development Partners (North Shore) is pleased to submit a preliminary concept plan for property owned by the city, which previously was the home of City Hall, located at 1450 Highway 96 West. With this submission North Shore is requesting the city consider selling the parcel for the purpose of developing an upscale townhome rental community - examples attached. The surrounding uses are Highway 96 on the north, Kinder Care on the east, single family homes to the west and Arden View town homes to the south. North Shore is proposing 60,2 story townhomes with thoughtful design and amenities for residents. About North Shore North Shore is locally based out of Wayzata, MN with strong background in high quality multifamily and mixed -use real estate assets for Twin Cities communities. With more than 30 years of development expertise across the Twin Cities, North Shore brings a robust roster of industry relationships and a passion for creating unique, optimized financing solutions to each project. We provide expertise in tax-exempt bonds, conventional bank financing, agency executions and TIF, among others. North Shore does not seek third -party equity. Our portfolio of assets is managed by Steven Scott Management, one of the Twin Cities' most respected building management firms. Please refer to our website for more information on our portfolio and our management team: www.northshoredp.com Regards, //I'- Matt Alexander North Shore Development Partners 235 EAST LAKE STREET, SUITE 300, WAYZATA, MN 55391 I , 7", "-kpe 37VI-JAV yN rr �� y �'.ier, L r �• tr' f �-•fl•. •'fix` .f r`• �. ��.. } f f 5 l r i F1 h i ,�r S 1 CN .0 -St, a ZD I L 1. 0-18 ] ..0 - ,OV AGENDA ITEM — 3C ,-ARZEN HILLS MEMORANDUM DATE: February 12, 2024 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Dave Perrault, City Administrator FROM: David Swearingen, P.E. Public Works Director / City Engineer SUBJECT: Metropolitan Council — Private I/I Grant Program — Equity Component Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A MCES Council Should Consider: • A formal statement be made by the City of Arden Hills to fulfill the equity component required for the application for Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) 2024 private property Inflow and Infiltration (I/I) Grant Program. Background/Discussion The 2024 Private I/I Grant Program is a "Pilot" year for Met Council. It will provide $1.5 million in wastewater revenue to provide grants to private property owners to help with repairs that will remove and prevent clear water from entering the wastewater treatment system. The Minnesota Legislature amended statute 471.342 to allow the Met Council to provide grant funding to local municipalities to assist private property owners with costs associated with repairing sewer infrastructure on their property. At the December 11, 2023 regular Council Meeting, resolution 2023-059 was approved to apply for the MCES 2024 private property I/I grant program. Arden Hills requested $80,000 but was awarded $45,000 for the 2024 Private Property Inflow and Infiltration grant program. Arden Hills is 1 of 21 other municipalities that received funding for the program. The program is setup so that MCES funds match 50% of the construction costs up to $5,000. If the City has an equity component then the match can be up to 100% up to $10,000. The equity component can also be tiered with multiple match percentages. Other options the Council should consider; The City can choose to decrease the match percentage but it is capped at 50% (for non -equity properties), this would spread the funding out to more homes. Or, the City could contribute local funds to increase the matching level from 50%. Page 1 of 2 City Staff recommends forgoing the equity component for this "Pilot" year as this is an entirely new program to implement with limited City staff resources. City staff would prefer to put together the basic technical processes first and then expand on that process in a future program. If the Council chooses to forgo the equity component, the funding would be available on a first come first serve basis. In order for a property to become eligible for this program, they must prove inflow & infiltration issues with some form of documentation to be reviewed by City staff. For example, a contractor's sewer scoping video and/or report that identifies I/I addressed to the property. Budget Impact This program is funded through Metropolitan Council, so there is no direct budget impact. Attachments N/A Page 2 of 2 AGENDA ITEM — 3D ,AVEN HILLS MEMORANDUM DATE: February 12, 2024 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Dave Perrault, City Administrator FROM: David Swearingen, P.E. Public Works Director / City Engineer SUBJECT: City -Owned Land Encroachment Discussion Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A Council Should Consider Council should discuss and provide direction on handling of encroachments to City -owned property. Resident Requested Action At the June 12�h regular City Council meeting, Mr. Bonine, Property Owner of 3274 Katie Lane, spoke during public inquiries requesting to be added to a future work session in order to allow for further conversation regarding a concern with his property. At that time, he presented to the City Council a letter dated May 25, 2023 addressed to city staff which outlined a proposal for collaboration to allow plantings on city park property adjacent to his lot. The general consensus of the Council was to bring this discussion forward at a future work session. Staff was directed to include the background on park land encroachments as part of the staff report for this discussion. Background/Discussion At the October 17t', 2022 work session, the City Council discussed a complaint received regarding a property on Katie Lane adjacent to the trail that was mowing into the park property and had planted trees essentially creating a vegetative fence as an extension of their rear yard. Staff was directed to send a code enforcement letter requesting that the trees be removed from city property. Page 1 of 2 The following is the city code section pertaining to this matter: City Code Section 720.06, Subd. 1 Defacement, Destruction of Property and Resources. No person shall tamper with, injure, deface, destroy, disturb, damage or remove any part of any system building, structure, sign, lightpole, drinking fountain, hydrant, table, grill, equipment, statue, flower, tree, shrub, plant, tun`, soil conditions, or mineral resource, nor shall any person plant or cause to be planted any wild, cultivated or exotic tree, shrub or plant except with the written permission of the director. On November 4, 2022, city staff sent a letter to the Owners of 3274 Katie Lane requesting the discontinued maintenance (i.e. mowing) of city property and removal of the plantings that encroached on public park land. Given the seasonal constraints it was requested that corrective action be taken in the spring of 2023. Mr. Bonine approached city staff in May with a proposal to allow for plantings on city park property. Based on the prior direction of the Council, city staff indicated to Mr. Bonine that this project could not be administratively approved. This led to Mr. Bonine's request to the City Council for further discussion on this topic. At the September 18, 2023 Work Session (minutes are Attachment C) Council gave direction to staff to develop draft ordinance language for future City -owned property encroachments and develop a draft agreement related to 3274 Katie Lane. Attachment A, is the draft ordinance change. Staff requests direction on the proposed ordinance change and will begin revisions accordingly. Attachment B, is the draft Encroachment Agreement with the 3274 Katie Ln property. Staff is requesting Council review the document and provide comments and directions, specifically on: • Limiting the number of plantings. Currently it appears there are 40 plantings, in previous discussion there was mention of removing every other planting. • Limiting the height of each planting. • Additional requirements? City Council may also decide to deny the proposed encroachment at 3274 Katie Ln. Budget Impact N/A Attachments Attachment A — Draft ordinance change Attachment B — Draft Encroachment Agreement Attachment C — September 18, 2023 Work Session meeting minutes Page 2 of 2 2/6/24, 11:25 AM export.amlegal.com/api/export-requests/5f3f76cl-57eb-468f Attachment A 720.06 General Conduct. Subd. 1 Defacement, Destruction of Property and Resources. No person shall tamper with, injure, deface, destroy, disturb, damage or remove any part of any system building, structure, sign, lightpole, drinking fountain, hydrant, table, grill, equipment, statue, flower, tree, shrub, plant, turf, soil conditions, or mineral resource, nor shall any person plant or cause to be planted any wild, cultivated or exotic tree, shrub or plant except with the WFitten peffnissien ef the diFeetar. an Encroachment Agreement approved by the City Council. https://export.amlegal.com/api/export-requests/5f3f76cl -57eb-468f-a 191-6ba85b591 c51 /download/ Attachment B (reserved.for recording information) ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT This ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made this day of , 2023, by and between the CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City"), and ROBERT M. BONNIE and JENNA M. BONNIE, spouses married to each other ("Owners"). RECITALS 1. Owners are the fee owners of certain real property located at 3274 Katie Lane in the City of Arden Hills, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota, which is legally described as � 4, Block 2, Hazelnut Park Addition No. 3 (PID: 333023320073) (the "Subject Property"); 2. The City is the fee owner of certain real property (PID: 333023120004), which is adjacent to the Subject property and is improved with a segment of public trail between Cleveland Avenue and Stowe Avenue and connected to the City -owned Hazelnut Park (the "City Property"); 3. Owners have planted a row of small trees or shrubs (the "Plantings") on the City Property, which runs the full width of the Subject Property, and has mowed the grass on the City Property around and between the Plantings (collectively, the "Encroachment"), as is depicted on Exhibit A (the "Encroachment Area"); 4. Pursuant to Arden Hills City Code Section 720.06, subd. 1, "No person shall tamper with, injure, deface, destroy, disturb, damage or remove any part of any ... flower, tree, shrub, plant, turf, soil conditions ... nor shall any person plant or cause to be planted any wild, cultivated or exotic tree, shrub or plant" on City -owned property, unless such activity is permitted by the City. This prohibition applies to unauthorized mowing of City -owned property; and 5. Consistent with the authority granted by the City Code and with past City practice on other properties, the City is willing to permit the Encroachment, subject to the conditions set forth in this Agreement. NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency and receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the City and Owners have agreed as follows: 2281030 1. Encroachment Authorization; Special Conditions. The City hereby approves the Encroachment, including the right to reasonable mowing of the City Property as depicted within the Encroachment Area, and permits the Encroachment to remain in the Encroachment Area, subject to the terms of this Agreement, including but not limited to, the following special conditions: A. Owners are the sole owners of the Encroachment, and are solely responsible for all work, cost, and expense for the maintenance of the Encroachment; B. Other than routine trimming and mowing of the Plantings that are already planted within the Encroachment Area, Owners are not permitted to alter, replace, expand, relocate, or add new plantings the Encroachment without prior approval by the City; C. At Owners' sole cost and expense, Owners are required to do all of the following: i. Comply with any directive or order given by City staff following inspection of the Encroachment; ii. The number of Plantings are not to exceed a quantity of X (X) and must be of like kind. iii. Maintain the Plantings at a height no taller than Xfeet; iv. Trim or remove the Plantings individually or coltedively as directed by City staff, and/or as required by the City, Xcel Energy, or other governmental agency; V. Promptly remove and replace any individual Planting that has died; vi. Upon removal of any individual Planting, group of Plantings, or the Encroachment as a whole, restore the Encroachment Area to a condition consistent with the condition of the surrounding City Property; and vii. Nd 2. Admission of No Right. Owners does not now claim any rights or title to any part of the City Property by reason of past, present, or future occupancy there, nor will Owners make any such claim in the future. 3. Acknowledgements by Owners. Owners acknowledge that City's ownership rights of the City Property, including the Encroachment Area, shall be superior to those rights conveyed by this Agreement. Owners further acknowledge that Owners' placement of the Encroachment in the Encroachment Area over and across the City Property includes the risk that it might become necessary that the Encroachment be disturbed or removed to facilitate City access to the City Property. 4. City Right of Entry, Work Within Encroachment Area. At all times, regardless of the hour of day or day of the week, the City shall have the right to enter onto the Encroachment Area to perform maintenance, repairs, replacement, or other work related to the City Property, as deemed necessary by the City, in the City's sole discretion. 5. Inspections by the City. The City shall inspect the Encroachment for compliance 2281030 with this Agreement, and other compliance with the City Code. 6. Insurance. Owners are required to maintain a general liability insurance policy which provides coverage for damage to others or injury to persons for their property the Encroachment Area. Such coverage shall be on an as occurrence basis and, if reasonably available, as part of a standard homeowner's policy. Without substantial additional cost, shall include contractual liability coverage with respect to the indemnity obligation in Section 6 of this Agreement. Such policy shall contain a clause which provides the insurer will not change, non - renew, or materially change the policy without first providing the City thirty (30) days prior written notice. Owners shall provide the City with a Certificate of Insurance for such coverage upon City request. 7. Hold Harmless and Indemnity. In consideration of being allowed to encroach on the City Property, Owners, for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agree to indemnify and hold the City, its officials, employees, contractors, agents, and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, damages, losses, costs, and/or expenses, arising from, based on, related to, or caused by, in whole or in part, the Encroachment. 8. Waiver of Claims. Owners knowingly and voluntarily waive and release any and all claims against the City arising from, based on, or related to Owners being permitted to maintain the Encroachment on the City Property. 9. Termination of Agreement. The City may, at its sole discretion, terminate this Agreement at any time by giving Owners, or any successor in interest, thirty (30) days advance written notice of termination. In the event of an emergency condition, as determined solely by the City, the City may terminate the Agreement without notice and with immediate effect. A. Removal of Encroachment. Except as provided in paragraph 9.B. of this Agreement, upon the effective date of termination of this Agreement, Owners or their successor in interest shall remove the Encroachment and restore the Encroachment Area to a condition consistent with the condition of the surrounding City Property. If Owners or their successor in interest fail to timely perform such removal and restoration, the City may remove the Encroachment and charge the cost of removal back to Owners for reimbursement. B. Retention of Encroachment. At its sole discretion, the City may choose to allow the Plantings to remain in the Encroachment Area following termination. If the City so chooses, the notice of termination shall inform Owners of the City's choice. Upon termination with retention of the Plantings in the Encroachment Area, the Plantings shall become the property of the City, o cost to the City. The City shall assume all responsibility for the ongoing mainttTidnce of the Plantings. 10. Recording. This Agreement shall run with the land and shall be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. At the time that this Agreement is terminated pursuant to Section 9 of this Agreement, the City shall execute and record a release of the Agreement. 3 2281030 11. Attorneys' Fees and Costs. Should either party commence and action against the other to enforce any obligation contained within this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable attorneys' fees and costs from the non -prevailing party, whether or not such action is pursued to judgment. 12. Miscellaneous. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota and may only be amended in writing. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which when executed is considered an original, but all of which together shall constitute one instrument. 13. Incorporation of Recitals and Exhibit. The Recitals at the beginning of this Agreement and the Exhibit attached to this Agreement are true and correct, and are incorporated into and made part of this Agreement by reference. [Signature pages follow] 4 2281030 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS :1 (SEAL) And STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) David Grant, Mayor Dave Perrault, City Administrator The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2023, by David Grant and by Dave Perrault, respectively, the Mayor and City Administrator of the City of Arden Hills, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public 2281030 PROPERTY OWNERS: Robert M. Bonnie Jenna M. Bonnie STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF 1 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2023, by Robert M. Bonnie and Jenna M. Bonnie, spouses married to each other. Notary Public DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON, P.A. Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 AKLS 6 2281030 • r � Attachment C -ARQEN_HILLS Approved: October 23, 2023 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION SEPTEMBER 18, 2023 5:00 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 4. PRESENTATION ITEMS A. City Owned Land Encroachment Community Development Director Jagoe stated that Mr. Bonine, Property Owner of 3274 Katie Lane, spoke during public inquires requesting to be added to a future work session in order to allow for further conversation regarding a concern with his property. At that time, he presented to the City Council a letter addressed to city staff which outlined a proposal for collaboration to allow plantings on city park property adjacent to his lot. The general consensus of the Council was to bring this discussion forward at a future work session. Staff was directed to include the background on park land encroachments as part of the staff report for this discussion. Community Development Director Jagoe said that in 2019 the City received a general complaint about properties that were encroaching in the general area of Floral Park and a trail segment between Cleveland Avenue and Stowe by Hazelnut Park. At that time an informative letter was sent to 22 households describing what the City considered to be encroachments and to remove them if they had them. There was a second letter sent to Mr. Bonine who corrected the things noted in that code enforcement letter. In 2022 there was another complaint and discussion by the Council regarding Mr. Bonine's property, specific to the trees that are there today. Staff was directed to ask that the trees be removed. Community Development Director Jagoe stated that it was confirmed with the Public Works Director that to his knowledge there have not been instances of written permission being granted to a resident to add plantings as part of their private landscape on park property. Staff did confirm for the stretch of houses along Katie Lane (abutting park property) that there were three households issued a building/zoning permit for a fence since 1989. Mr. Bonine said he acquired the property in 2015 and at the time had discussions with staff. Neighbors had been given verbal permission to do landscaping in the area as long as they had Xcel Energy's permission for the easement. About 4-5 years ago he had further conversation with staff and was told the city wouldn't allow a fence, so he went back to the original plan. He said there were 36 houses along the path and felt about 50% had encroachments including bonfire pits, fences, play sets, raised garden beds and plantings. He would like to understand what makes his encroachment unique and if they could develop some consistency. Councilmember Holden said she spoke with the former City Engineer who claimed she never gave anyone any oral permission to do anything to encroach on the City parks. She felt ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — SEPTEMBER 18, 2023 2 encroachments happen on other trails in the city. There have been articles in the newsletter regarding this. She felt if someone puts a row of shrubs or trees along the trail they are extending their yard and it is no longer park land, it's viewed as the resident's land. Councilmember Rousseau asked if this was becoming problematic for the City to maintain the areas that are being encroached on. Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen said the way they maintain this trail is to run a mowers width on either side of the trail, and Xcel Energy does the larger area mowing and vegetation control. There are some sanitary sewer structures that are accessed off the trails and possibly some storm sewer structures. He felt there was adequate room for snow storage and from a maintenance aspect the encroachments in this area weren't in conflict with maintenance. Mr. Bonine noted that he has no issues with anything anyone else has done, but the lack of consistency is confusing. Councilmember Rousseau thought the complaint they received seemed very negative and personal, and basing the entire community policy on this complaint might not be the right way to go. Councilmember Monson asked about the two examples of other properties that were given. Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen said in Example 1 there was a rain garden owned and maintained by the City. Councilmember Monson said she has talked with other people that live along the trail and has been told the same thing — that they could put items in at their own cost but that it might get moved. She wanted to be sure it wouldn't cost the City more if they had a watermain or something similar to fix. She asked how staff felt about trees and plantings being in the way and the costs of moving them. Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen stated that shrubs were pretty easy to move but trees were more impactful. Fencing or hardscaping would also be more impactful, and City staff would not put the items back, it would be up to the homeowner. Councilmember Holden agreed that the letter was very negative. There are groups of people that walk Hazelnut Park trails and they've been dealing with this issue for many years. They've been upset because they haven't taken over City property in their yards and are frustrated with the length of time this has been happening. Councilmember Fabel asked how many arborvitaes Mr. Bonine had planted. Mr. Bonine responded that he had planted over 30. He went forward with the project because of ongoing communication he had with City officials and the letter of approval he received from Xcel Energy in 2019. Councilmember Fabel explained his concern of adverse possession; that someone using your land over a period of time establishes rights to continue to do so. That can be avoided by having a ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — SEPTEMBER 18, 2023 3 specific agreement in place to say that they wouldn't claim adverse possession, and that at any point in time the City could say to remove the items. He didn't see a reason to force Mr. Bonine to take the trees out now, but he could be told to in the future if it became a problem for the City. Mayor Grant asked if they will be putting a new watermain through this area. Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen said this area is south of where the new force main would be located. Mayor Grant added that by adding something such as a fence you are demonstrating use which becomes adverse possession. He said it could be argued that the arborvitaes are a vegetative fence. He was troubled by this much vegetation and thought they should have some sort of written agreement. Councilmember Holden wondered what the City's liability would be if someone were to get hurt on the section of property that he has extended his yard into. City Administrator Perrault said that according to the city attorney's previous answers to similar questions, if the City is intentionally negligent it would be liable, but it is typically the generator of the activity that is liable. Councilmember Monson thought they should consider a broader agreement for everyone on the trail that has encroachments to deal with adverse possession, liability, and additional costs for removal if they don't remove it themselves. She appreciated how well that part of the trail is maintained by the residents. She felt they should have a policy of what residents could have along trails and in what areas. The question would be where do they draw the line. Mr. Bonine also thought the trail area looks good. He said when they moved into the property it was full of buckthorn and invasive species. They looked at what they had done as a positive. He thought the Blue Thumb Initiative might be a good guide for some of what they're talking about being acceptable. Mayor Grant asked if the Council wanted the City Attorney to work the Community Development Department to draw up something legal for this project as well as update City Code to be more explicit. Councilmember Monson said she would support that. Councilmember Holden wondered how far they would let people encroach on City property. Councilmember Rousseau said her concern was that if they ask Mr. Bonine to move his trees they should probably be talking to other people to move their encroachments as well. She liked the suggestion of outlining what is acceptable. Mayor Grant said this was clearly one of the larger encroachments that he has seen. Councilmember Monson said because of the timing of when it went in she doesn't like it either, but because of the other things that have happened along the trail and there hasn't been a hard ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — SEPTEMBER 18, 2023 4 policy from the City it would be beneficial to try to figure out what they can tell people they can do. To just pick one person based on a complaint felt dangerous because what do they do with all the other people that have encroached? Mayor Grant said with all of the aerial photos that are available nowadays you can pretty much prove when something went in. Councilmember Holden verified that Mr. Bonine had received the letter the City sent to residents in the area regarding encroachment before he planted his trees. She thought they should post signs saying it was City property and people would be allowed to use it. Mayor Grant restated that they want firmer ordinances strictly enforced and a legal agreement with this property. He asked if they were permitting the arborvitaes to live pending a legal agreement with the landowner. Councilmember Holden suggested a height limit for the arborvitaes. Mayor Grant said they could work out the details of a legal agreement at a future meeting. Councilmember Monson explained how she thought PTRC might be able to contribute to the discussion. Councilmember Rousseau thought members of PTRC might recommend native species where other people might look at them as being unkept or wild versus planting a rosebush. Councilmember Fabel felt they should solve the current issue with an agreement that says if they want to they can require them to keep the arborvitae at a certain height, take them out or take out every other one so there is no prescriptive right obtained by the encroacher but also shows the City is willing to be reasonable. Mayor Grant asked Council if they'd like hard-line or soft -line language in future language, three Councilmembers and the Mayor agreed to hard-line. City Administrator Perrault said if they're taking a hard-line policy are they allowing additional flexibility such as allowing native plants? Right now, the policy is clear that nothing is allowed with the exception of permission by the Public Works Director. Councilmember Monson felt mowing or buckthorn removal could be reasonable and still have a hard-line. Mayor Grant would like to make the ordinance clearer so there would be fewer questions about what is encroachment. He thought in this particular case by putting up a row of arborvitaes and mowing the other side of it, adverse possession could be argued. He asked what direction they would like to give the attorney in this case. Councilmember Fabel said the agreement should make it very clear that they are visitors on City property and we have the authority to place further conditions on the property. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — SEPTEMBER 18, 2023 5 Councilmember Monson agreed. She would also like to know how much it would cost for the City to remove them if needed. Councilmember Holden didn't think anyone would have complained if it was just mowing. She thought it was the plantings to extend the yard that were the issue. She would like to see gaps in the arborvitaes and they be kept at a certain height. Mayor Grant directed staff to have the attorney work on an agreement and make changes to the ordinance. AGENDA ITEM — 3E -t1 DEN HILLS MEMORANDUM DATE: February 12, 2024 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Dave Perrault, City Administrator SUBJECT: Civil Attorney Update Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount N/A N/A Council Should Consider Council should discuss next steps on finding a new Civil Attorney. Background Funding Source: N/A The City was informed by its Civil Attorney, Campbell Knutson, that it can no longer serve the City for the longer term. Campbell Knutson was recently renewed as the Civil Attorney following an RFP process. The Council should discuss and consider how it wants to move forward, i.e. issuing a new RFP for Civil Attorney services or engaging the second choice from the RFP, Eckberg Lamers. The last RFP was issued in 2023, and the City received three proposals for Civil Attorney. One firm was not brought forward for Council interviews and two firms were (Campbell Knutson and Eckberg Lamers). Should Council want to move forward with the second choice, Staff will seek out a refreshed proposal for Council to consider; or if Council prefers moving forward with an RFP, Staff will move in that direction. Regardless, Campbell Knutson has agreed to assist the City until a new attorney can be brought onboard. Budget Impact N/A Attachment N/A AGENDA ITEM — 3F ,-ARZEN HILLS MEMORANDUM DATE: February 12, 2024 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Dave Perrault, City Administrator SUBJECT: Virtual Meeting Options Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A Council Should Consider Council should discuss next steps on how to handle virtual meeting options going forward. Background A verbal update will be provided. Budget Impact N/A Attachment N/A AGENDA ITEM — 3G 'It ,ARZEN HILLS MEMORANDUM DATE: February 12, 2024 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Dave Perrault, City Administrator SUBJECT: Rice Creek Commons/TCAAP Discussion Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A For Council Consideration Council will have the opportunity to comment on any TCAAP related items they so choose. Background N/A Budget Impact N/A Attachment N/A Page 1 of 1 AGENDA ITEM — 3H ,-AI�EN HILLS MEMORANDUM DATE: February 12, 2024 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Dave Perrault, City Administrator SUBJECT: Council Tracker/Council Priorities Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A Council Should Consider Council should provide further direction on the Council Tracker and upcoming Council priorities. Background The Council Tracker will be distributed upon Council request. Future priority items will have been distributed to Council electronically. Below are the anticipated work session items for March. March 11 Work Session Items: • Concept Review • Concept Review • Concept Review • 2025 Park Projects • Annual Public Works Maintenance Plan • Community Development Consultant • PTRC Motions • Water Efficiency Grant • Low Mow May • RCC Discussion • Council Tracker Budget Impact N/A Attachment N/A Page 1 of 1