Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 06-08-1987 , 'MlNUTES OF THE ARDEN HILamGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Monday, June 8, 1987, 7:30 p.m. - Vi11ase Hall e CALL TO ORDER Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Woodburn called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. JIIIROLL CALL The roll being called the following members were __ present: Mayor Robert Woodburn, CouncilJneJnbers Nancy Hansen, Gary Peck, Thomas Sather and Jeanne Winiecki. Also present: Village Attorney James Lynden, Attorney Robert Plunkett, Planner Or1yn Hiller, Treasurer Donald Lamb, Parks Director John Buckley, Public Works Supervisor Robert Raddatz, Clerk Administrator Patricia Horrison and Deputy Clerk Catherine Iago. AMEND AGENDA LABOR NEG. Sather moved, seconded by Hansen, that Item #15, Labor Negotiations Report be moved to a Closed Meeting at the end of this evenins's agenda. Hotion carried unanimously. (5-0) FIRE REPORT Hansen moved, seconded by Peck, that Item #16, Fire Report, be moved to a Closed Heetins at the end of this evening's agenda. Hotion carried unanimously. (5-0) APPROVE MINUTES Moved by Hansen, seconded by Peck, that Council approve the minutes of the Resular Council Meeting of May 26th Meeting of June 1st as submitted. Hotion carried and the Special Council unanimously. (5-0) eBUSlNESS FROM FLOOR None. LINnEY'S TRIANGLE Council was referred to letter from Robert Plunkett dated 6-2-87; regarding Judge Fleming's decision relating to the discharge of the highway easement at Lindey's Triangle. Plunkett explained the Court decided that the entire parcel is still subject to the highway easement and the parcel is still being used for highway purposes; use of the parcel for occasional recreational use or softball play is consistent with its use for public purposes. He advised Council that today the Board of Commissioners determined the property value, with the highway easement upon it, to be $5,000.00 and awarded appraisal fees in the amount of $300.00 to Kenna's appraiser, for a total cost to the City of $5,300,00. Plunkett noted that this amount was less than the original offer the City had made to Kenna. Plunkett advised that the respondent has 40 days to appeal the decision; he outlined reasons why, in his opinion, the District Court would not in all probability overturn the decision. He, therefore, advised the Council that they have a reasonable amount of time to abandon condemnation proceedinss, or, to decide to purchase the parcel. 4ItcounCi1 discussed the options of abandoning the condemnation proceedinss or purchasing the parcel. Plunkett and Village Attorney Lynden agreed that if the Council abandoned the condemnation proceedings the City would have the obligation to pay Kenna's attorney's fees; which may exceed the amount determined for the purchase price of the land. Plunkett also pointed out that Ramsey County would have the option to release a part of the parcel for development if the Kennas or any other developers would come to the County with a sufficiently large cash offer; in other words, purchase of the land by the City would prohibit this type of litigation from private parties in the future. Council asked the Parks Director for his opinion on purchase of the parcel. Buckley commented that there is not much open space left in this older area of the Village and this parcel should be preserved for residents in the area; also this area is one of the gateways to our community and should be retained. Rob Plunkett assistance. work on this thanked Planner Or1yn Hiller and John Buckley for their valuable Council expressed their thanks to Attorney Plunkett for his fine matter. . Hoved by Peck, seconded by Winiecki, that Council proceed with the acquisition of the property known as Lindey's Triangle, generally located in the area qf Snelling Avenue and County Road E, and, further, authorizes the payment of $5,000.00 to John J. Kenna, Jr., for the parcel of land and $300.00 to Mr. R. J. Tansey, Kenna's appraiser, for payment of appraisal fees. Motion carried. (5-0) Minutes of the Regula~uncil Meeting, June 8, 1987 . Page 2 . , ORn. NO. 247: REZONING B-2 TO 1-2 SCHERER LUMBER Moved by Hansen, seconded by Peck, that Council suspend the rules, waive the reading and approve ORD. NO. 247, AN ORDINANCE REZONING 4947 HIGHWAY 10 FROM B-2 (GENERAL BUSINESS) TO 1-2 (GENERAL INDUSTRY). Motion . carried unanimously. (5-0) ORn. NO. 248: REZONING 1-2 TO B-2, LEXINGTON AVENUE. C.G.REIN Moved by Sather, seconded by Peck, that Council suspend the rules, waive the reading and approve ORD. NO. 248, AN ORDINANCE REZONING A PARCEL OF LAND AT LEXINGTON AVENUE NORTH OF GREY FOX ROAD FROM 1-2 (GENERAL INDUSTRY) TO B-2 (GENERAL BUSINESS). Hotion carried unanimously. (5-0) ORn. NO. 246: SNOWMOBILE &.ALL TERRAIN VEH. ORD Council reviewed Ordinance No. 246; pertaining to further amendment of the Snowmobile and All Terrain Vehicle Ordinance. In discussion, Council questioned if the language relating to the hours of operation should be the same in Section 26.35 (b); hours of operation on roadway and Section 26.42; hours of operation within 100 feet of a residential building. Attorney Lynden suggested deleting the terminology "within the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m." in Section 26.42 and adding the terminology "except as permitted in Section 26.35." He noted that the entire ordinance is drafted to permit things by exception rather than directly addressing what is permitted. . Councilmember Hansen advised that some cities have eliminated the operation of snowmobiles on the lakes; she suggested Council consider prohibiting the use of snowmobiles on lakes in Arden Hills. Councilmember Sather stated that since we share shoreline with the City of Roseville at Lake Josephine staff should review their ordinance relating to the use of snowmobiles to insure compatibility. In discussion, Council determined that the County should review the ordinances since they are responsible for enforcement on the lakes. Lynden commented that the Ramsey County Attorney should draft a model ordinance for the cities. Councilmember Winiecki questioned if Section 26.38 had been retained in the ordinance; since Section 26.36 refers to that section. Lynden stated it was retained and it defines crossing streets. Council concurred that the Clerk Administrator should forward a copy of this ordinance to Ramsey County Sheriffs Office for their review and request a copy . of Roseville's ordinance for comparison purposes. Moved by Hansen, seconded by Peck, that Council suspend the rules, waive the reading and approve ORD. NO. 246, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE II OF CHARTER 26 OF THE ARDEN HILLS CODE BY INCREASING PURVIEW THEREOF TO ENCOHPASS RECREATIONAL MOTOR VEHICLES, REORGANIZING SAID ARTICLE, AND ADDING A SECTION REQUIRING MANDATORY PENNANTS FOR SNOWMOBILES. Peck moved to amend the motion, seconded by Sather, that Council approve the language change in Section 26.42 which deletes the terminology "within the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m." and insert the terminology "except as permitted in Section 26.35." Amendment to motion carried. (5-0) Original motion as amended carried unanimously. (5-0) Moved by Hansen, seconded by Winiecki, that Council authorize the Clerk Administrator to publish a Summary of Ordinance No. 246, as distributed to Council this evening. Hotion carried unanimously. (5-0) . PUBLISH SUMMARY; ORDINANCE NO. 246 . . . . , . Regular Council Meeting, June 8, 1987 . Minutes of the Page 3 PROPOSED ORD.; CHARIT. GAMBL. Council was referred to the proposed ordinance regulating lawful gambling; as drafted by the Village Attorney. Lynden reviewed the new State legislation which defined the percentage of net proceeds to be given to the City and the fees to be charged by the City for investigations; not more than 10% of the net proceeds can be given to the City and the fee charged for investigations is limited to $100.00. The Attorney advised the Clerk Administrator sugge.ted referencing the investigation fee by Council resolution, limiting the fee to $100 at this time, but providing an easier approach for increasing the fee in the event it can be increased. Lynden also reviewed an item from the League of Minnesota Cities relative to Cities imposing a local gambling tax on each licensed organization if the tax proceeds are necessary to cover the costs of regulation of gambling; he noted , the tax may not exceed three percent of the gross receipts of the organization, minus prize costs. The tax is in lieu of all other local taxes and local investigations fees and must be reported annually. Lynden stated this may not be cost effective administratively; he has not had the opportunity to review the reporting process and what is involved. Councilmember Hansen questioned: Section 6, EliRibilitv for License - Are requirements stringent/specific enough; Section 11, Sites for Issuance of Licenses - Does this section effectively eliminate Bingo Hall, since it is not specifically addressed. Section 13, Number of Licen.e. in the City - Can pha.e out proce.. be completed in a shorter time span. In response to the questions, the Attorney stated that Section 6 requirements are, in his opinion, rigorous; Section 11, he was unsure of terminology to describe the facility so he used "auditorium"; suggested adding "public hall" to the list of facilities. There was discussion relative to the number of licenses versus the number of bingo occasions which can be held. Lynden advised that Section 15 addresses this matter and that Arden Hills ordinance can be more stringent that State Law. Council also discussed Section 19, age limit, whether or not children under the age of 18 should be allowed to play Bingo: Councilmember Hansen expressed her opinion that children under 18 years of age should not be allowed to play; Winiecki stated that there may be occasions where going to play bingo would be a family activity. Council discussed whether or not Churches could request Bingo permits for a one time occasion. Lynden advised the ordinance could provide for one time, special events; he noted the Church group would still have to apply for the State license even for one time occasions. There was discussion relative to establishments where lawful gambling is allowed. The Attorney advised it is outlined in this draft ordinance and may be changed by the Council at their discretion. Councilman Sather stated it is his opinion that trying to enact an ordinance regulating lawful gambling at this time, after approval of the Bingo Hall has been granted, is poor policy. He asked for the Attorney's opinion relative to legal exposure of the City and outlined his reasons for concern. Lynden commented that he would need to further research the matter of legal exposure before an opinion could be given, in light of the costs incurred by the Bingo Hall. Council discussed the new legislation relative to lawful gambling, the phase out process, referring this matter to a sub-committee for study, discussing the Council concerns with the owners of the bingo facility and setting criteria for review of gambling licenses. Councilmember Hansen advised that an Attorney General's opinion would be forthcoming regarding the Little Canada Bingo operation; she stated it may be prudent to review that opinion and also the minutes of the Little Canada Council meetings relative to this matter. Minutes of the RegUl~ouncil Meeting, June 8, 1987 ~ Page 4 , CHAR. GAMB. (Cont'd) Council concurred to hold further discussion of the proposed Charitable Gambling Ordinance until after an Attorney General's opinion has been received relative to the Little Canada operation and the Village Attorney has had an opportunity to review new State . Legislation and discuss the Little Canada bingo operation with their staff. CASE #87-17; VAR. 1136 HUNTERS CT. Council was referred to Planner's report of 5/27/87, the Board of Appeals Minutes (5-21-87) and Planning Commission Minutes (6-3-87) both recommending approval of the variance . Miller explained the house currently has a small roofed porch at the front entrance and the applicant is proposing to enclose the open porch. The enclosure will extend to within 35 ft. of the front lot line; the Arden Hills code permits a 3 ft. encroachment for an "open porch", however, a 40 ft. setback is required for an enclosed entrance. The Planner noted that no hardship related to the land has been identified and stated justification would have to relate to placement of the house on the lot and the fact that no reasonable alternatives exist for an enclosed entry (as noted in the Planning and Board of Appeals minutes). Council was referred to a letter signed by nine neighbors of the applicant; stating they are not opposed to the variance as requested. Moved by Sather, seconded by Peck, that Council approve . Case #87-17, a 5 ft. Front Setback Variance at 1136 Hunter Court, as submitted. Discussion ensued relative to whether or not a precedent would be established on this cul-de-sac street. Miller advised that on a curvilinear street uneven setbacks are not as apparent as when homes are set in a straight line. Councilmember Hansen commented that after viewing the site, it was her opinion that the appearance of the home would be enhanced by the enclosure. Motion carried. (Sather, Peck, Hansen, Winiecki voting in favor; Woodburn opposed) (4-1) CASE #87-18; SITE PLAN REV. & VAR.. ARDEN HILLS CLUB Council was referred to Planner's report, 5-27-87, and Planning Commission minutes (6-3-87), recommending approval, with conditions as outlined in the Planning minutes. Miller explained the applicant is proposing to replace the air-supported structure, as well as expand by adding two additional tennis courts and increasing the parking area. He reviewed the current parking situation and explained that in his opinion the two additional courts coupled with 20 . additional parking spaces will not increase the parking deficiency but will contribute to the general parking supply. Miller noted that if the intensity of use of the facility increases Significantly, the applicant will have to research the possibility of "shared parking" with Control Data. The Planner referred Council to the Board of Appeals letter dated 6/8/87, recommending approval of the 5 ft. height variance as requested. Council discussed the proposed alternate parking lot design as prepared by the Planner; questioned if the driveway shown to the south is currently in place and expressed concern about safety for patrons of the facility. Miller advised that the southerly driveway is currently used as a service drive. therefore, patrons are aware of it; he also commented that the service drive could use upgrading and the alternate parking lot design would allow for upgrading in conjunction with the expansion, as well as creating extra parking spaces and eliminating the third access onto Fernwood Avenue. He advised Council that the dumpster located in the service drive area is not currently screened and the applicant would have to provide screening. There was discussion relative to the parking deficiency. The Planner stated . that the Special Use Permit approved for the Sports Clinic located in the facility included a stipulation for review of the parking area and compliance to parking requirements if a' problem arises; he noted a possible alternative would be a "shared parking" agreement with Control Data. . Minutes of the Regular~Cil Meeting, June 8, 1987 Page 5 . CASE #87-18 (Cont'd) Council questioned the 40 ft. height of the air-supported structure; asked the Planner if this is the standard height for this type of structure. . Miller stated he has not verified a standard height for air-supported structures; however, since they are commonly used he could research the matter. Fire Chief Winkel commented that Council may consider reviewing the Uniform Fire Code relating to this type of structure before approval is granted; he advised there are requirements such as, distance of air-supported structures from existing buildings and storage. Moved by Hansen, seconded by Sather, that Case H87-18 be continued to the Regular Council Meeting of July 13th, to allow the Fire Chief time to review the Uniform Fire Code, as it relates to air-supported structures, 'and to provide the Planner time to review typical heights of these 'structures. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) CASE #87-19; MINOR SUBD. & SITE PLAN REV. DAYBRIDGE CNTR. Council was referred to Planner's report (5-28-87) and Planning Commission minutes of June 3rd; recommending approval with several contingencies. . Planner Miller reviewed the conditions of the recommended approval and explained the Minor Subdivision. He advised the City required a 20 ft. easement be provided, granted to the City, between the City property and the proposed Daycare site. Miller noted that the easement would have to be maintained and was granted in lieu of partial park dedication; he was unsure if the park dedication had been fully resolved. Planner explained the temporary access drive that will be provided to Hamline Avenue and eventually will serve the entire site; applicant advised the south side of the access drive will have permanent curb at this time and the other side would be blacktop only. He noted that no grading plans have been received yet and upon receipt they should be evaluated relative to drainage, tree removal and grading. Miller also reviewed the single access to the site from Highway 96, centered on the east property line; this driveway will also serve the future development to the east. Both access drives have been reviewed by Glen Van Wormer, Trsffic Engineer, and have been determined acceptable in te~ of sight distances and separation from the Hamline/Highway 96 intersection. Miller reviewed the sign proposal and advised the applicant had assured the Planning Commission members the sign would meet code requirements and, therefore, no variances are being requested at this time. . Miller discussed the landscape plan and suggested some berming at the front of the site and additional plantings at the rear of the site where the property abuts the'Townhouse Villages. The applicant has evaluated the plantings at the rear of the site and has a plan to present this evening that addresses the matter. Council was referred to the discussion at the Planning Commission meeting relative to screening of the mechanical equipment on the roof of the proposed daycare center. Miller displayed a site-line visibility diagram, which indicates that the rooftop mechanical equipment will be visible from the second level of the townhomes, unless screening is provided at the property line or on the building. He stated the applicant has indicated that they are agreeable to working with staff to provide adequate screening of the rooftop equipment. There was discussion regarding the screening of the trash containers. Miller explained the containers would be located near the front of the site and stated that the applicant had not provided a plan for screening but would be willing to do so. Dwight Chestnut and Randy Petersen, Daybridge Daycare Center, displayed photos of the site showing site lines on the property looking south toward the townhomes. They stated they are agreeable to providing additional plantings and to work with staff on this issue. ... There was discussion relative to the operation of the daycare facility. Council questioned if there'would be a crossover provided on Highway 96. Randy Petersen stated there would not be a crossover, which was the reason for the access drive to Hamline Avenue. Minutes of the RegUla~ouncil Meeting, June 8, 1987 . Page 6 CASE #87-19 (Cont'd) Moved by Sather, seconded by Peck, that Council approve Case #87-19, Minor Subdivision and Site. Plan Review for Daybridge Daycare Center, contingent upon the conditions as outlined by the Planning Commission in their minutes of June 3, 1987, and, upon resolution of Park Dedication. . There was discussion relative to the landscape plan and berm. The Planner stated the berm would be moderate and he would prefer to defer approval of the landscape plan until the site has been graded. Miller also addressed Council questions relative to extending the roofline parapet for screening purposes; he noted that was his recommendation, however, even if that is provided there would be the need for additional screening from the second level of the townhomes. Council concurred that the applicant should be required to provide adequate ,screening since this parcel will set a precedent for the remaining vacant portion of land. Council also commented that they would like to see a fair percentage of the screening provided by evergreens. Council discussed the striping of Hamline Avenue to locate the access drive and a mandatory right turn lane for the access drive off Highway 96. Miller advised he would review both matters with Glen Van Wormer. He stated it was the Engineer's opinion that the right turn lane from Highway 96 would be a mandatory requirement from MN/DOT. Council also discussed the park dedication for the parcel; questioned if the . matter was resolved by providing the 20 ft. easement. Parks Director Buckley stated he would research the matter and report back to Council. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) EDGEWATER ESTATES LGTING/LANDSCAPE PLAN REPORT Planner reported to Council that he had reviewed the. landscaping and lighting plans and they conform to City requirements for these items. He noted that the landscape plan did not address the entrance to the apartment complex; applicant was unsure as to why this area was not included in the plan submitted. Miller advised that if an adequate job is done at the entrance, similar to the plan submitted this evening he would recommend approval. Planner reviewed the lighting proposed for the driveway, parking lot area and front of the building; it is a low-level bollard light. He stated security lighting is provided at the sides and rear of the building by small building-mounted floodlights. Council questioned if the underground garage facility would be lighted. . Miller stated he was not aware of the light source in the underground garage facility, however, it is usually provided on a permanent basis for security and safety purposes. The consensus of the Council was to accept the Planner's recommendation for approval of the lighting and landscape plans, contingent upon applicant providing Planner with design for entrance landscaping. Council was referred to Fire Chief's memorandum (6-5-87); which states that although the underground garage area will not be sprinkled, the owner has provided the alternatives for compliance with the Uniform Fire Code. Winkel stated the owner is providing portable extinguishers and openings of 20 sq. ft. every 50 linear ft. which are entirely above ground. He noted that the windows in the .garage area are 32 sq. ft. in size and are placed every 30 ft.; which exceeds the U.F.C. requirements. EDGEWATER ESTATES; GARAGE SPRINKLING REPORT; FIRE CHIEF Councilmember Winiecki questioned if there was access provided to the rear of the building for emergency vehicles. . Fire Chief Winkel stated there is a gravel road at the rear of the building for emergency vehicle access; he noted that the applicant was not required to provide this access but has been very cooperative. Council accepted the report. NO. HGTS. LUTHERAN CHURCH; LIGHTING Planner discussed the conversations he has had with Arlo Lien, Business Manager for the Church, relative to the lighting complaints received by the Village. Minutes Page 7 of the RegUla~ouncil Meeting, . June 8, 1987 . LIGHTING (Cont'd) Miller stated that Lien was planning to contact his consultants relative to refocasing the existing lights and ordering screens for the lights to reduce the spread of the lighting. He further advised that Lien stated the light shields are being shipped; he explained that he would like to have an opportunity to evaluate the lighting for compliance with the zoning code when the shields are in place, during the evening hours. When this is accomplished, Miller will report back to Council. REPORT OF PARKS DIRECTOR PROB. COMPLETION KEVIN FULLER Council was referred to Buckley's memorandum (6/3/87) regarding Kevin Fuller's completion of his probationary period and recommending a salary increases. Buckley stated the Kevin has been an excellent employee and will satisfactorily 'complete his probationary period on June 30th. He recommended a $.50 per hour increase at this time and continued $.50 per hour increases at six month intervals until Kevin's salary is equal with other Parks employees. Parks Director advised this it would take approximately 2 years to accomplish the salary equity and that each six month increase would be reviewed by Council. Sather moved, seconded by Winiecki, that Council approve the full-time employee status of Kevin Fuller upon completion of his probationary period on June 30, 1987, and authorize a salary increase as outlined by Parks Director John Buckley in his memorandum of 6-3-87. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) . PURCH. OF PARKS ONE-TON TRUCK The Public Works Supervisor reviewed the information he had discussed at the last Council meeting relative to the bid received on this vehicle. Raddatz stated that he polled the dealers to whom bids had been sent and reported that this is the time of the year when model changes occur; dealers are hesitant to submit a bid on the 1988 models since firm prices are not known. It was Raddatz's opinion that re-bidding would not be beneficial and he recommended accepting the bid from Minar Ford for the 1988 Truck at a cost of $13,995.00. Raddatz advised Council that he and the Parks Director had discussed the purchase of a 1986 Truck that was on the car lot, owned by GMC, however GMC was not willing to lower the price of the vehicle. He stated that the new 1988 truck could be purchased for approximately the same price as the 1986 truck. Council questioned if the box and plow would be bid separately. . Raddatz stated they would. Moved by Hansen, seconded by Sather, that Council approve the purchase of a one-ton truck for the Parks Department from Minar Ford, at a cost of $13,995.00. In discussion, Council questioned if Raddatz would trade in the old truck at a value of $5,000.00 or sell it outright. Raddatz stated the old truck is in good condition and it was his opinion that selling it outright may be more profitable. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) RES. #87-29: INCR. BLDG. PERMIT FEES Council was referred to Finance Committee minutes of May 28th, recommending an increase in Building Permit Fees. Mayor Woodburn discussed information he had compiled relative to current fees and projected income with the increase. He stated the increase for an average building permit for single family homes would be two and one-half times greater than the current fee. He questioned if the 65% surcharge. for plan review is in addition to the building permit fee increase. . Clerk Administrator Morrison stated the 65% plan check fee would be an additional charge; she advised she had contacted other communities (Roseville and Shoreview) and found that even though the surcharge is mandated by State law, they do not charge residential homes that fee. Morrison advised that the State has not, to date, taken any action against these communities. Morrison commented that the Building Inspector recommended Council adopt the 1985 Building Permit fee schedule and charge the 65% surcharge only on Commercial and Industrial permit applications. Minutes of the Regul~ounCil Meeting, June 8, 1987 . Page 8 RES. 87-29 (Cont'd) After discussion of the proposed increase, Council concurred that they are opposed to charging the 65% plan review fee for residential building permits. Councilmember Winiecki questioned if the increase seemed high due to the fact . the Village has not increased the fee for a number of years. Morrison commented that the Village currently uses the 1979 Building Permit fee schedule. Moved by Sather, seconded by Hansen, that Council approve Resolution No. 87-29; RESOLUTION REVISING FEES FOR BUILDING PERMITS, RE-INSPECTIONS AND MISCELLANEOUS CONSTRUCTION PERMITS AS REQUIRED BY ORDINANCE NO. 217, AND ABOLISHING RESOLUTION NO. 83-56, and furthermore, amends Item #2: Plan Check Fee to read: " 50% of the building permit fee for all commercial/industrial/institutional new construction and remodeling permits." 'Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) RES. #87-30; REV. PERMIT FEES FOR ZONING ACTIVITIES Council was referred to Finance Committee minutes of May 28th recommending increased permit fees for Zoning and Subdivision Codes. Clerk Administrator Morrison advised the increases have been reviewed with the Zoning Administrator and Planner and stated the increases more closely reflect the fees charged by other communities and should adequately cover the administrative costs. . Council questioned if applicants would receive an estimate of consultant fees upon submitting application. Morrison advised that the fees would be based on the sophistication of the case, however, she stated it may be possible for the consultants to give the applicant an estimate of costs. Moved by Hansen, seconded by Peck, that Council approve Resolution No. 87-30; RESOLUTION REVISING FEES FOR APPLICATIONS UNDER CITY ZONING AND SUBDIVISION CODES. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) FINANCE COMM. APPOINTMENT Council was referred to Finance Commission minutes of May 28th; recommending Council appoint a resident to serve on the Finance Committee. Morrison advised that one member has not attended any meetings since January 1st and another member has attended only one meeting; the Council suggested advertising for interested persons. Council discussed the resumes from Thomas Mulcahy and Sandra Dunekacke; they suggested a notice be placed in the Town Crier and on Cable TV for further ... resumes and Council would review them at a future date. RESIGNATION; HUMAN RTS. COMM. thanks for her service Moved by Hansen, seconded by Peck, that Council accept the resignation of Lois Donalds from the Human Rights Committee and that she be sent an appropriate letter of on the Committee. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) Council suggested the Clerk Administrator advertise for persons interested in serving on this Committee in the Town Crier and on Cable T.V. REPORT OF TREASURER INVESTMENTS Treasurer Lamb advised the Council of the following investments: 6/5 - $257,192.82 at Twin City Federal. at 6.60%, to mature 6/29/87. Moved by Hansen, seconded by Sather, that Council ratify the Treasurer's report. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) Lamb advised the Council that he is anticipating investing one million dollars 4It in Treasury Bills for a period of one year. Council discussed whether or not the monies would be needed for the purchase of a possible site for a fire station; Lamb commented that the funds could be withdrawn with a minimal penalty if necesssry. Minutes of the RegUlajltouncil Meeting, Page 9 June 8, 1987 . OTHER BUSINESS None. REPORT OF CLERK ADMINISTRATOR . RES. 1/87-27; RES. 1/87-28; SEW/WATER INCR. Clerk Administrator explained that these Resolutions would formalize the previously approved rate increases. Moved by Hansen, seconded by Peck, that Council approve Resolution No. 87-27; RESOLUTION REVISING SEWER UTILITY RATES, EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 1987 and Resolution No. 87-28; RESOLUTION REVISING WATER UTILITY RATES EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 1987. Hotion carried unanimously. (5-0) SIGN PERMIT: C.P.I. Council was referred to Deputy Clerk's memorandum of June 3, 1987; relative to a request from Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc., to erect banner signs snd a display event this summer. ,bslloon for a special Hansen moved, seconded by Sather, that Council approve the use of the 13 Banner Signs, for a period of 8 weeks and at a cost of $25.00 and the use of a display balloon for a period of one day, at a cost of $25.00 at Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc., as further outlined in the Deputy Clerk's memorandum of June 3, 1987. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) REQ. TO ATTEND CLKS. INSTITUTE . registration fee Hoved by Hansen, seconded by Peck, that Council approve the Deputy Clerk's attendance at the Year III Hinnesota Hunicipal Clerks Institute and authorize payment of the and mileage reimbursement. Hotion carried unanimously. (5-0) CLAIMS & PAYROLL Hansen moved, seconded by Sather, that Council approve Claims and Payroll as submitted. Mayor Woodburn asked why there were two identical checks made payable to the IRS; one was manual. Horrison advised she would review the matter before the checks were mailed. Councilmember Peck questioned the overtime pay for a Public Works employee; Horrison advised that the overtime was due to the damage at a lift station during a thunderstorm. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) CLOSED MEETING - LABOR NEGOTIATIONS AND FIRE REPORT ADJOURNMENT Sather moved, seconded by Winiecki, that the meeting be adjourned at 12:45 a.m. Hotion carried unanimously. (5,-0 ) . f~.J#77~ Robert L. Woodburn Hayor NOTICE OF MEETINGS The next regular Council meeting will be held on Honday, June 29, 1987, at 7:30 p.m., at the Village Hall. .