HomeMy WebLinkAboutCCP 08-13-1990
- i?EY/SE~- ,
U
( '/'
AGENDA
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING - CITY HALL
MONDAY. AUGUST 13 , 1990 - 7:30 P.M.
--~---------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------
1- CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL - 7:30 P.M. .
2 . AGENDA ADOPTION. X
3 . APPROVAL OF JULY 30 MINUTES.
_. \,
4. CONSENT CALENDAR: 'c
"-
a. Approval of Canvassing Request from Teen Suicide
Prevention Task Force.
b. Appointment of Election Judges and Approval of Pay
Increase for Election Judges.
c. Approval of Request to Attend National Park & Rec.
Conference.
d. Acknowledgement of city Hall Committee Report.
e. Rescinding Action of Setting Cleveland Avenue Assmt.
Public Hearing.
Approval of Final Payment (& Change Order) for HRS
Construction for Work at Kem Milling.
. Approval of Final Payment ( & Change Order) for Berger-
son Caswell for Work at Kem Milling.
Approval of List of Claims and Payroll.
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR.
PUBLIC COMMENTS.
I 6. UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS:
I a. Case #90-11, SUP for sts. volodymr & Olga Ukranian
Orthodox Church, Hwy. 96/Snelling Avenue.
b. Case #90-09, site Plan Review for Racquet Sport Court at
4155 North Lexington Avenue.
** c. Case No. 90-10, Minor Subdivision and Variance,
MeyerlMedlin, Hamline/Amble.
d. Recommendations on Lexington Avenue Study Area Rezoning.
e. Albjerg Driveway Restoration Payment, 1680 Oak Avenue.
f. Appointment to Economic Development Committee.
g. Draft City Hall citizen Survey. (Diafic TLuxlcr from
Decision Resources will be present) . . j
~UNCIL COMMENTS.
7.
8 . ADJOURN.
. ----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
AUGUST MEETINGS
Aug. 15 - Budget Worksession, 5:30 PM
Aug. 20 - Budget Worksession, 2:00 PM
. Aug. 20 - Council Worksession, 5:30 PM
Aug. 27 - City Council, 7:30 PM
Aug. 28 - Board of Appeals, 5:30 PM
Aug. 28 - Park and Recreation, 7:30 PM
"
---- --- ~ -
if' AGENDA
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING - CITY HALL
.
1990 - 7:30 P.M.
MONDAY. AUGUST 13.
------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------
1- CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL - 7:30 P.M.
2. AGENDA ADOPTION.
3 . APPROVAL OF JULY 30 MINUTES.
4. CONSENT CALENDAR:
a. Approval of Canvassing Request from Teen Suicide
Prevention Task Force.
b. Appointment of Election Judges and Approval of Pay
Increase for Election Judges.
c. Approval of Request to Attend National Park & Rec.
Conference.
d. Acknowledgement of city Hall committee Report.
e. Rescinding Action of setting Cleveland Avenue Assmt.
Public Hearing.
f. Approval of Final Payment (& change Order) for HRS
. construction for Work at Kem Milling.
g. Approval of Final Payment ( & Change Order) for Berger-
son Caswell for Work at Kem Milling.
h. Approval of List of Claims and payroll.
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR.
5. PUBLIC COMMENTS.
6. UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS:
a. Case #90-11, SUP for sts. Volodymr & Olga Ukranian
Orthodox Church, Hwy. 96/Snelling Avenue.
b. Case #90-09, site Plan Review for Racquet Sport Court at
4155 North Lexington Avenue.
c. Recommendations on Lexington Avenue Study Area Rezoning.
d. Albjerg Driveway Restoration payment, 1680 Oak Avenue.
e. Appointment to Economic Development Committee.
f. Draft city Hall citizen survey. (Diane Traxler from
Decision Resources will be present).
7. COUNCIL COMMENTS.
8 . ADJOURN.
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
AUGUST MEETINGS
. Aug. 15 - Budget Worksession, 5:30 PM
Aug. 20 - Budget Worksession, 2:00 PM
. Aug. 20 - council Worksession, 5:30 PM
Aug. 27 - city council, 7: 30 PM
Aug. 28 - Board of Appeals, 5:30 PM
Aug. 28 - Park and Recreation, 7:30 PM
---- - ------
COUNCIL cllNUTES ~ / h /1_ DATE ~'/3-'1r::;:AGE /
SUBJECT: nt M ~ I- ~
I
. DISCUSSION: ___ --,-
.
---
!"OVe~~R SAT:ERI~UNC~~~N-:u.~~. ---- .~~----==-~-----
Seconded: (HAYOR SATHER) COUNClLMBR: (HANSEN) ;'IALONE) (GRO\IE)
THAT COUNCIL:
--
-------~-- ~"--------
--------- --.--.--.----.-----.- ---
VOTE: AYES: NAYS:_.__~___ .""_~______ _._______~_~
Hansen Malor,e Sal:her Hansen ~1alonc Sather
. Grot...e Hahm.;ald Grm'7c Haho~.Jald
ABSTAIN: TOTAL: ( )
Ha.nsen Halone Sathe!:' Gro\'lcHc-l.hoH,-lld Ayes Nays Abs.
ALSO P';'::'ESENT; C]_k/Adll!inistraL:oJ~____--A-__"At l:O(\lt~:/__ Y_TJ:e,::,suTer__~___Engineer_~
Perks Direc tor ~ Pub. 1,-::"-5. S1.:pervisor__._~__Planner y- Dcp. elk -4
' /, -
MINUI'ES OF THE ARDEN HILlS REX;OLI\R COUNCIL MEEI'ING
MONDAY, JULY 30, 1990, 6:30 P.M. - CITY HALL
CALL ill ORDER Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Sather
. called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m.
INFDRMATIONAL Council held an informational meeting with residents
MIG; KEITHSON of Keithson Drive, to discussion problems with the
DRIVE POND pond in this area.
ROLL CALL The roll being called the folla;..ring members were present:
Mayor Thomas Sather, Councilmembers Nancy Hansen, Paul
Malone, JaArm Growe and ThOll'aS Mahowald. Also present: Planner John Bergly,
Attorney Jerry Filla, Public Works SUpervisor Dan Winkel, Clerk Administrator
Gary Berger and Deputy Clerk Catherine Iago.
ADOPT Council was referred to the revised Agenda for the
REVISED 7-30-90 meeting; includes additional item, 6. (e): Set
AGENDA Assessment Hearing Dates for Oak Avenue and Cleveland
Avenue Improvement Projects.
Councilmember Hansen requested an additional item be included on the agenda:
6. (f): siems Court Water Problems.
Malone moved, seconded by Growe, to adopt the July 30
Revised Agenda, which includes items 6 (e) & (f). Motion carried unaniJ:nously.
(5-0)
APPROVE MINUI'ES Hansen moved, seconded by Growe, to approve the June 25
. 6/25 & 7/09/90 and July 9, 1990 Regular Council Meeting Minutes as
s'Jhnitted. Motion carried. (Hansen, Growe, Sather and
Mahowald voting in favor; Malone abstained) (4-0-1)
CONSENT Councilmember Mahowald requested an approximate cost
CALENDAR estimate for hiring terrporary help for storm debris
clean-up; Item 4. (f) on the Consent Calendar, and what
funds will be utilized for payment.
Public Works SUpervisor Winkel stated the costs should not exceed $1,000.00 and
staff is =ently researching use of Parks and Public Works funds to pay for the
terrporary errployees.
Malone moved, seconded by Mahowald, to approve the
Consent Calendar as suJ:mitted, and authorize execution of all necessary d=urnents
contained therein:
a. Approve Partial Payment for 1990 OVerlaY/Sealcoating Project.
b. Approve Upgrade of CoITputer Memory.
c. Adopt Resolutions No. 90-29 and 90-30, Northwoods Reapportionment of
Assessments .
d. Accept Resignations from Board of Appeals Chair and Planning commission
Member.
e. Appoint Park and Recreation commission Member.
f. Approve Hire of Temporary Help.
. g. Approve Mileage ReimJ::ursement Rate In=ease.
h. Approve Partial Payment to HRS Construction for Kem Milling Project.
i. Approve List of Claims and Payroll.
Motion carried unaniJ:nously. (5-0)
PUBLIC CXlMMENTS None.
Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Council Meeting, 7-30-90
Page 2
CASE #90-08; Council was referred to the report of Planner Bergly .
SIGN VAR. & PERMIT, and Planning Corrn:nission Minutes dated 7-11-90, and the
TRINITY llJIHERAN Board of Appeals Minutes dated 6-26-90, relative to the
CHURCH, 3245 NEW request for a Sign Setback Variance and Sign Permit for
BRIGHIDN ROAD Trinity llltheran Church, 3245 New Brighton Road.
Planner Bergly explained the applicant is requesting a 5 ft. variance from
setback requirements for institutional signs. He noted there are two items for
consideration, a variance request and a sign permit for an institutional sign in
a residential district; institutional sign requirements are somewhat different
from business signs. He advised the proposal is to construct a ground-mounted
sign at the site l=ated on New Brighton Road, north of the fire station. Bergly
also pointed out the proposed l=ation of the sign on the property and the
l=ation of existing signs.
The Planner advised the Planning Corrunission and Board of Appeals both reconrrnended
denial of the requested variance based on the lack of identifiable hardship, the
fact there are other suitable l=ations for the sign that will meet the setback
requirements and may provide better visibility, and the lack of other signs in
the area competing for a driver's attention.
Bergly explained that the Planning Corrn:nission recommended Council approve a Sign
Permit for a sign which meets the setback requirement, upon denial of the
variance request and the applicant's s\lhnission of detailed sign construction
plans prior to installation.
council1nember Hansen questioned if a sign placed at the required setback will .
move it too close to the church wilding.
The Planner stated there will still be sufficient distance if the sign is l=ated
five feet closer to the wilding, at the required setback. He explained the sign
will have good visibility to traffic approaching from either the north or the
south along New Brighton Road.
Bergly explained there are two other signs on the property which are l=ated near
this proposed sign location and may interfere with the sign if the variance is
granted.
Patricia Johnson, representing the church ancl Dr. Northwick, Pastor of Trinity
llltheran Church, were present to discuss the application.
Johnson stated the main reason for updating the sign is due to growth programs
and the new sign will have a four-line reader board. She explained visibility is
an :i:mportant factor in promoting the new programs. Johnson pointed out the only
landscaped area on the site is at the south end of the property and the north
portion is mainly parking area. She also noted the angular placement of the
wilding to the street contrib.1tes to lessened sign visibility.
Johnson advised the residents directly a=oss the street from the church were
contacted and had no objections to the requested variance. She stated
Presbyterian Homes, on Johanna Boulevard, was granted a setback variance for a
sign for better visibility. .
Dr. Northwick discussed the power poles which =ntrib.1te to lessened sign
visibility; the five foot variance will in=ease the visibility of the sign.
-
Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Council Meeting, 7-30-90
Page 3
. CASE #90-08 (Cont'd) Council1nember Hansen stated the sign is attractive. She
explained the situation at Presbyterian Homes is not
similar, due to a steep slope at that location which prohibited placement of the
sign at the required setback.
Malone IlIOVed, seconded by Mahowald, to deny the sign
setback variance request from Trinity Lutheran Church, case #90-08, on the basis
of no identifiable hardship to justify the requested variance. Motion ca=ied.
(Malone, Mahowald, Growe and Sather voting in favor; Hansen opposed) (4-1)
Hansen IlIOVed, seconded by Mahowald, to approve a Sign
Permit, case #90-08, for Trinity Lutheran Church, subject to the applicant
suhnitting detailed sign construction plans prior to installation. Motion =ied
unanilrousl y. (5-0)
STA'IUS RPT; Planner Bergly advised the Metropolitan Council has taken
MEr COUNCIL ACTION action to approve the Gateway Business District Plan and
GATmAY BUS. DIST. a report on this matter will be suhnitted for Council
action at a future meeting.
ORD. #268; AMEND Council was referred to a report from Clerk Administrator
CHAR. GAMBLING Berger dated 7-27-90, and a letter from Attorney Filla
ORDINANCE dated 7-20-90, relative to the proposed amendments to
the Charitable Gambling Ordinance.
Attorney Filla explained two dc=.rrnents were attached to the letter; the first
. dc=.rrnent is a revised ordinance format and the second d=ument outlines how the
ordinance will appear in code, if adopted.
Filla reviewed the significant changes included in the proposed ordinance, which
include:
1. Insertion of appropriate language to incorporate the "premises permit"
concept. The city now has the authority to review and make recormnendation for
approval of premises permits and the State Gambling Control Board will be solely
responsible for licensing the organization requesting the premises permit.
2. In=ease the authorized number of licenses from 9 to 10 and a provision which
reduces the number from 10 to 9 on a future date; the date will have to be
inserted.
3. In=rporation of a provision which indicates that licensed organizations must
expend 75 percent of their net income within the City of Arden Hills or in
contiguous cities; per Council direction.
4. Language changes and additional definitions to make a more comprehensive
dc=.rrnent; the definitions are the same as regulations adopted by the Minnesota
Charitable Gambling Control Board.
Filla advised council consider a date for insertion in Section 5-8, which will
reduce the authorized number of licenses from 10 to 9. He stated the Gambling
. Control Board did not provide information as to when current licenses in Arden
Hills expire. Filla suggested March or April 1, 1991 as the expiration date,
based on City records which indicate current licenses will not be scheduled for
renewal until March 22, 1991.
Mayor Sather questioned if Section 5. 13, the provision requiring licensed
organization to expend 75 percent of their net in=ne within Arden Hills "Trade
Area" may be too high. He recommended reducing the requirement to 50 percent.
-
Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Council Meeting, 7-30-90
Page 4
ORD. (Cont'd) Council1nember Malone conrrnented that the City of Shoreview .
requires 100 percent of net profits be expended in the
trade area.
Council1nember Mahowald questioned if charities will be excluded from
participating in Arden Hills if this requirement is imposed.
Herb King, representing the Light Brigade, stated st. Paul Turners may have
difficulty meeting the requirement since they are a school and are located in st.
Paul.
The Mayor explained the higher percentage may drive revenue sources out of the
city. Sather pointed out Shoreview has only Class B licenses for pull-tab
operations and no Class A license operations. He favored inclusion of the
restriction at the reduoed percentage to allCM the charities to continue to
operate in the city and generate donations for local organizations.
council1nember Mahowald favored reduction to 50 percent; questioned if the "trade
area" could be expanded to include Ran1sey County.
Attorney Filla advised the Ordinance may be lrore restrictive than state law,
however, it may not be less restrictive; the trade area is clearly defined in the
law as contiguous cities.
Council1nember Hansen favored the 75 percent requirement; stated the law provides
for requiring 100 percent. .
Mahowald moved, seconded by Malone, for purposes of
discussion to approve proposed Ordinance No. 268, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPI'ER
4, ARTICLE I, DIVISION 5, SECTIONS 5-1;5-1(A) , (B) , (C) AND; 5-2; 5-3; 5-4; 5-5;
5-5(A); 5-5 (A) (1); 5-5 (A) (2); 5-5(B); 5-6; 5-7; 5-8; 5-10; 5-11; 5-12; AND 5-13;
AND ADDING CHAPI'ER 4, ARrICLE I, DIVISION 5, SECTIONS 5-1 (E) , (F) , (G) , (H), (I) ,
(J) AND 5-14 TO THE ARDEN HILlS MUNICIPAL CODE RElATING ID GAMBLING. Motion
carried unanilnously. (5-)
Mahowald lroVed, seconded by GrCMe, to amend Section 5-13
of the proposed Ordinance to delete ".. . seventy-five percent" and insert
" . . . shall expend at least 50 percent..". Motion carried. (Mahowald, Growe, Malone
and Sather voting in favor; Hansen opposed) (4-1)
Council1nember Hansen suggested this requirement become effective January 1, 1991,
rather than upon publication, to allow time to inform organizations of the
amendment.
Attorney Filla advised it would be preferable to amend Section 5-14 of the
proposed Ordinance, pertaining to effective dates.
Council discussed insertion of the date of expiration of the tenth license as
outlined in Section 5-8. Council1nember Mahowald favored a later date than March
1,1991, to allow time for all licenses to be suJ::rnitted for renewal, including the
two which have not yet been approved by the state Gambling Control Board.
Mahowald lroVed, to insert the date of December 31, 1991, .
as the expiration date of the tenth license. Motion died for lack of second.
-
- -
Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Council Meeting, 7-30-90
Page 5
. ORD. (Cont'd) Malone moved, seconded by Growe, to insert the date of
May 1, 1991, in section 5-8, as the date of expiration of
the tenth license. Motion carried. (Malone, Growe, Mahowald and Sather voting in
favor; Hansen opposed) (4-1)
Growe moved, seconded by Malone, to insert in section
5-14; "section 5-13, shall become effective January 1, 1991, and the remaining
sections shall become effective the day following publication. Motion carried
unanimously. (5-0)
There was discussion relative to establishing =iteria for approval of licenses.
Attorney Filla advised the =iteria will be drafted as a Resolution, separate
from the Ordinance itself. He explained there are only two basic =iteria which
will be utilized; revenue generated in the "trade area" and =:iJ:nina1 history.
Filla stated Council may hold issuance of any premises pennit until such time as
a few licenses have expired and then the applications could be evaluated at the
same time.
Malone moved, seconded by Mahowald, to amen:J. the second
paragraph of section 5-10, to indicate the reports outlined are required no later
than February 1 of each year, and the reports also may include other information
as required from time to time by Council Resolution. Motion carried unanimously.
(5-0)
Mahowald moved, seconded by Malone, to adopt Ordinance
No. 268, as amen:J.ed. Motion carried. (Mahowald, Malone, Growe and Sather voting
. in favor; Hansen opposed) (4-1)
ADOPT POLICY; Council was referred to a report from Public Works
SNOWPLOWING Supervisor Winkel dated 7-25-90, recommending adoption
of the snowplOW'ing policy, effective 8-1-90.
council1nember Hansen suggested the amount of snow a=nnulation be consistent
throughout the policy.
Winkel agreed; noted he will instruct staff to change any discr-epancy.
Council1nember Mahowald questioned if the City maintains public sidewalks.
Winkel explained the city does not cu=ently have sufficient manpower or
equipment to maintain public sidewalks.
Malone moved, seconded by Hansen, that Council adopt
the snowplowing policy, as sutmitted, to become effective August 1, 1990. Motion
carried unanimously. (5-0)
SET BUDGET Council was referred to a mem::mmdum from the Clerk
WORKSESSION Administrator dated 7-25-90, requesting selection of
DATES budget worksession dates.
Malone moved, seconded by Mahowald, to schedule three
. Council Worksession meetings for the purpose of discussion on the proposed 1990
budget document on the following dates: Thursday, August 9, at 5:30 p.m.;
Wednesday, August 15, at 5:30 p.m.; and Monday, August 20, at 2:00 p.m., all
meetings to be held at City Hall. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0)
.
.
Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Council Meeting, 7-30-90 .
Page 6
SCHED. ASSESSMENT; Council was referred to a memorandum from the Clerk .
HElIRINGS, OAK & Administrator dated 7-30-90, relative to scheduling
CLEVEJ:.AND AVES. assessment hearing dates for the oak & Cleveland
Avenue llnprovement projects.
Attomey Filla advised that appropriate resolutions for both :i1rqJrovement projects
should be drafted which include the total project costs, the percentage of
assessment and ordering the preparation of an assessment roll.
Filla explained th;l.t the $2,065.00 that Albjerg paid for driveway restoration was
a legitimate project cost and would have been done by the city, except for the
fact it was more convenient for Albjerg's contractor to corrplete the job. The
Attomey stated a reconrrnendation will be forwarded to Council regarding the
driveway cost reimJ:x.Jrsement.
Malone moved, seconded by Hansen, to adopt the
appropriate resolution relating to Oak Avenue project (Improvement SI'-89-2) which
declares the cost of the project to be $24, U8. 20, determining 50 percent of the
total project costs to be paid by the City and declares $12,059.20 to be
assessed, orders preparation of the proposed assessment roll, and schedules a
hearing on proposed assessment on Monday, August 27, 7:30 p.m., at City Hall.
Motion carried unani1nously. (5-0)
Filla advised the Cleveland Avenue assessment hearing should declare costs of
$293,285.31 and that 100 percent of the costs be specially assessed, ordering
preparation of the assessment roll and scheduling the date of hearing.
Malone moved, seconded by Hansen, to adopt the .
appropriate resolution relating to Improvement No. SW-W-89-1 (Cleveland Avenue),
declaring the project cost to be $308,285.31, determining the costs will be
assessed 100 percent against benefited property owners, ordering the preparation
of assessment roll in that amount, and establishing the date of a public hearing
on Tuesday, August 28, at 7:30 p.m., at city Hall. Motion carried unanimously.
(5-0)
SIEMS COURr; Councilmember Hansen stated she has been contacted by
EROSION PROBLEM Oscar Wendt, 3458 Siems Court, regarding an erosion
problem on his property.
Hansen explained Wendt is experiencing erosion on his property since the recent
resurfacing of siems Court; the runoff now flows directly down the driveway at
this l=ation. She stated Wendt is requesting the city co=ect this problem
Public Works Supervisor Winkel explained he has been in contact with the resident
and discussed remedies to ==ect the problem. Winkel noted the property is
naturally low and drainage will =ntinue to flCM down the driveway after the
problem is co=ected.
Oscar Wendt was present and explained that recently a service line was installed
a=oss the roadway; believes this has added to the problem.
Council questioned if funds are available for ==ection of the problem. .
Winkel stated remaining project funds should be adequate to ==ect the problem.
--- ---
. .
Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Council Meeting, 7-30-90
Page 7
. COUNCIL cnlMENTS
MISCELIl\NEDUS Counci1Jrember Hansen advised she will be unable to
attend the Public Safety IWorks Corrunittee meeting
8/16/90.
RECYCLING UPDATE Counci1Jrember Hansen reported on the proposed reduction
of funds by the County to cities for recycling; suggested
residents be encouraged to pursue tax rebate f= recycling.
Counci1Jrember Malone conrrnented the residents cannot request the tax rebate
individually; noted that the County is also proposing to el:i1ninate the fees.
Clerk Administrator Berger stated Ramsey County should make a decision regarding
this matter by August 18.
Council suggested staff place information regarding any changes in the Town
Cr'ier, after Ramsey county makes a determination on this matter.
EASEMENT Counci1Jrember Growe questioned if a response was
ENCROACHMENTS received regarding the easement en=oachment on Bussard
Court .
Clerk Administrator Berger stated a letter was received from the resident by the
Building Inspector; Kriesel was asked to =ntact the resident by telephone to
insure clarification of any actions which may be taken by the city.
. REl;l. ClASS B Counci1Jrember Mahowald reconrrnended action be taken to
CF"R. GAMBLING approve the application for a Class B license to operate
LIC, LT. BRIGADE pull-tabs at the Blue Fox, for the Light Brigade.
Mahowald lOClVed, seconded by Growe, to approve the request
for a Class B Premises Permit, from the Light Brigade, to operate at the Blue Fox
Inn, effective the day after publication of Ordinance No. 268. Motion carried
unanimously. (5-0)
ADJOURN Hansen moved, seconded by Growe, to adjourn the meeting
at 9:50 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0)
Gary R. Berger ThomasR.Sather
Clerk Administrator Mayor
NOTICE OF MEETINGS
There will be a Budget Worksession Meeting held on Thursday, August 9, at 5:30
p.m., at city Hall.
. The next Regular Council Meeting will be held on Monday, August 13, 1990, at 7:30
p.m., at City Hall.
COO"" ,n,"'" ~ g - /J =~"A" ""
SUBJECT: /.e ~ ./
. DISCUSSION: ___-
~~ t - ~ 'fO..-/t>---
.
~.o-,-_-----'___.__._'-_____ ...~~
--
'loved: .(l1J\YOR SATHER) COUNCILMBR: (HANSEN) (GROh1E) (MAHOHALD)
Seconded: (!1AYOl\ SATHER) COUNCILMBR: HANSEN) (GROHE) (MAHOIVALD)
THAT COUNCIL: ~~_'_____________ __ ~~
-- -
-~._----- --- ---"---------------
-----VO;~~ mA~~S: ....... -----_ ~. -_______ NAYS :__=~_~_C)- - __ _ _____~__~___--n-
Hansen Malone Sathe1: H;;n1scn }1alonc Sather
. GrO\~'e Uahmvald GrO\.]c Hahowald
ABSTAIN: _.___ TOTAL: (- -)
Hansen t"L1.1 one Sather Cro'we :1(1[w\''',11d Ayes Nays Ab,s.
ALSO PRESENT: CJ.k/Aclministratol:_____AlLnluey______Trc2surer Englneer___
Parks Director Pub. ;.Jks. Supervisor Planner_~Dep. Cll\._~_
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
MEMORANDUM
. -----------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
DATE: August 13, 1990
TO: Mayor and city council
FROM: Gary R. Berger, city Administrator
SUBJECT: _Add-on Agenda for August 13 Council Meeting
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
One item was inadvertently left off tonight's agenda. This item
should be conducted under 6. UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS: and
should be considered after Item 6b. This item is CASE NO.
90-10, MEYER/MEDLIN, MINOR SUBDIVISION AND VARIANCE ON HAMLINE
AVENUE I AMBLE ROAD. (Please refer to Planner Bergly's memo and
the August 1 Planning commission Minutes) . Mr. Meyer will be
present for this request.
ACTION REQUIRED:
Council should add this item to this evening's agenda.
.
GRB:madlr
.
COUNCIL MINUTES /~ r~1 DATE PAGE
SUBJECT: ~ 1/
. DISCUSSION:
~-_.
-
-.
.
---
--,~.
hoved: (~YOR SATHER) COUNCILMBR: (HANSEN) (HALONE) (GROI,E) (HAHOWALD)
Seconded: (MAYOR SATHER) COUNClLHBR: (HANSEN) ZONE) . C(GRC;~ (;"AHO\.JALD)
THAT COUNCIL: ~~
~c#~~
---
--~---~_.-- -_.__._----~_.~ (5 .---.----. --6
VOTE: AYES: NAYS:
Hans eon Halone Sather Hansen }f21one Sather
. Grm.;e l:1ahm.Jald Grm.]e Mahowald
ABSTAIN: TOTAL: ( )
..._-. ---,._-----
Hansen HaJ.one Sather Growe. l"laholt/ald Ayes Nays Abs.
ALSO PRESENT: CJ_k/Administrator At lorne'j' Treasurer Engineer
__________"U
Parks Three tor Pub. \\lks. Superv1 SOY_ Planner Dol'. Clk
COUNCIL ,;:mWTES~ ~_ DATE PAGE
SUBJECT; ____ ~.
. DISCUSSION; "-"
.
.--.
~.;...'-'----------------'-~~~---~ ----
-- .
.--.
~-
i:'1oved: (I1hYOR SATHER) COUNCILMBR; (HANSEN) G~:~~ (GRb\~E) (MAHO\,ALD)
Seconded; (;1AYOR SATHER) COUNCILHBR: <:r;r;ii.NSE2V (HALONE) (GRO\,E) (HAHO\')ALD)
THAT COUNCIL;~ ~ if ~_ >>_~"~~_
---------~--
-~-~~-_._- . ----~~ - ----- .~---_....- cJ
VOTE: AYES; NAYS;
~~- 1'1<110ne Sathe.r
Hansen Malone S"ather Hanse.n
. Growe Nahmvald GroHe Ma !lOi-i2 ld
ABS'LUN; TOTAL: ( ,
- )
JlaL;,;(:;ll t'1alonc Sa t.:ht.:L- CU)Vie Hattll\.!ald Ayes Nay~. ADs.
ALSO PRESENT: elk/Administrator Allnrlle:.' TI"e3S1lrer ----------- Engineer
- --.--..-
Parks Director Pub. "~lks , Supervisor Planner Dep. Clk
- --~
-
. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
MEMORANDUM
. -----------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
DATE: August 6, 1990
TO: ci ty Council
FROM: &G G R Berger, City Administrator
ary .
SUBJECT: Door to Door Canvassing
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Staff received the attached letter of request from the Teen
Suicide Prevention Task Force, requesting permission for door to
door canvassing from mid-August, until approximately mid-
September.
Hours of canvassing will be 4 - 9:00 PM Monday through Friday,
and 9:30 or 10:00 AM to 4:30 PM on Saturday.
According to City Ordinance, Council approval is necessary for
this type of canvassing.
RECOMMENDATION:
. Staff recommends approval of this request.
ACTION REQUIRED:
If Council concurs with the staff recommendation, they should
pass a motion, under Consent, granting approval for door to door
canvassing by the Teen Suicide Prevention Task Force from August
14 to mid-September, as requested.
GRB:madlr
attachment
.
. TEEN SUICIDE PREVENTION TASK FORCE
810 First Street South. Suite 210 A division of American Cultural Traditions, Inc.
Hopkins. MN 55343
(612) 936-7707
National Chairman
Ray Allen August 1, 1990
Executive Director
E. Michael Rusten, Ph.D. Gary Berger
Advisory Council City of Arden Hills
Hon. Joe Dio Guardi 1450 West Highway 96
u.s. Congress Arden Hills, MN 55009
David R. Allen, Ph.D.
Psychologist
Kathy Hogancamp Dear Mr. Berger:
UB. Dept. of Education
George D. Uribe II I am writing to tell you a little about who we are and
Students for Ameri,:a
Gary Hankins to inform you of our door to door canvassing activity in
Fraternal Order of Police your community during the months of August and September,
Educational 1990.
Spokespersons We are the nation's largest 501(c)3, non-profit
John Cardinal 0 'Connor
Archhishop of New York organization addressing the problem of teen suicide
H on. Stan Parris prevention. Our support comes mainly through the small
u.s. Congress donations of private individuals as we contact them by
!II'Wl Gin",;,h phone or by door to door canvassing, usually in the
ogress
H . hris Smith evening hours and during the day on Saturdays. In our
u.s. Congress contact we are also able to inform the public of the
Hon. Bob Walker seriousness of the problem of youth suicides in Minnesota
u.s, Congress (it's the second leading cause of death) and pass out our
Hon. Dick Armey
U.S. Congress free 30 page booklet entitled Teen Suicide Prevention.
Hon. Buddy Darden I've enclosed a copy for your review. If you would like
u.s. Congress more of them we'd be glad to supply you with as many as
Hon. William Lipinski you could use.
u.s. Congress
Hon. John Rhodes, III find a copy of our non-profit
u.s. Congress Enclosed please status and
Hon. Hobert Kasten a listing of car license numbers, people going door to
u.s. Senate door, etc. We will call you to confirm your permission
Hon. Richard Shelby for us to begin canvassing. Thank you for your
u.s. Senate
Hon. John McCain assistance in this important work.
u.s. Senate
Hon. 8m Armstrong Sincerely,
u.s. Sen8t.e
HOh. Dontl\d Hodel ~~~
Sec. of Interior. ReL e-
National Office
P.o. Box 76463
Washington, D.C. 20013 Charles Bourn
Administrative Area Director
Office
701 E. Main Street Enclosure
Grand Prairie, TX 75050
leor Annual Report
;n'aiJable on request.
Preventing tmgic youth suicide UJrough hroad-basoo public education concerning Uw value of cl'vry human lifv.
.
TEEN SUICIDE PREVENTION TASK FORCE
810 First Street South, Hopkins MN 55343
DOOR TO DOOR CANVASSERS
STEVEN JASON ALDES; 2215 KINGS VALLEY RD; GOLDEN VALLEY; 545-8887
ANGELA DONNELL ALEXANDER; 67 RENAISSANCE CT; HOPKINS; 935-4378
DAN JO ARMSTRONG; 5350 MT. CARMEL RD.; CARVER; 448-5293;7/9/71
LEANNE MARIE ASHBECK; 1245 HUNTER DR.; WAYZATA; 475-3171; 10/20/70
MICHELLE MARIE ASHMUN; 14460 19TH AVE. N.; PLYMOUTH; 473-1264; 3/25/74
JENNY LYNNE BELFORD; 1907 YORKSHIRE AVE. S.; MINNETONKA; 545-4960; 10/31/72
JENNY LYNN BERGMAN; 340 5TH AVE. N.; HOPKINS; 935-8817; 8/16/73
BECKY JEAN BLOCH; 7365 HOWARD LN.; EDEN PRAIRIE; 937-5381; 1/3/72
CARA JEAN BLODEN; 14060 ROYAL COURT; MINNETONKA; 933-1550; 7/6/73
BRANDON PAUL BORAN; 603 LAKE ST.#211; EXCELSIOR; 470-1025; 4/11/72
SHANNON MARIE BORAN; 1833 TRAILWAY DR.#7; EAGAN; 687-0547; 11/11/70
ALAN ROBERT BOWMAN; 14516 IDYLWOOD RD; MINNETONKA; 935-4266
ANDY JAMES BRIMEYER; 4370 COOLIDGE AVE. S.; ST LOUIS PARK; 929-7399; 9/8/71
TONY JOHN CHENEY; 5137 CHOWEN AVE.S.; MINNEAPOLIS; 920-5424
JOHN CRAIG CHENOWETH; 3800 EWING AVE. S.; MPLS; 927-0390; 9/17/73
JEANINE R. CLAPSADDLE; 1475 MEADOW LN; MAPLE PLAIN; 479-2722; 10/15/69
MEGGIN HINTON CLARK; 14292 WEDGEWAY CT.; EDEN PRAIRIE; 937-9510; 8/30/71 .
KRISTY CYN"HIA COLLIER; 4109 MERRIAM RD; MINNETONKA; 938-3661
DAMON PATRICK COYNE; 3685 WATERTOWN RD.; ORONO; 475-9026; 1/29/74
JOANNA LYNNE CUMMINGS; 2450 COUNTRYSIDE; LONG LAKE; 476-4327; 3/18/90
JOE WILLIAM CURTIS; 51 RENAISSANCE CT.; HOPKINS; 933-8893; 5/3/74
ANN FRANCES CUTHBERTSON; 17240 9TH AVE. N.; PLYMOUTH; 473-0016; 2/7/69
LANDRY ROBERT DEESE; 15900 DAWN DR; MINNETONKA; 937-2239
NANCY ANNE DERRICK; 2637 ;PLYMOUTH RD.; MINNETONKA; 541-1341; 3/5/73
STEPHANIE MICHELLE DEVICH; 5053 WOODLAND RD.; MINNETONKA; 933-2603; 6/26/72
DANICA SONG DIANGELIS; 17420 6TH AVE N; PLYMOUTH; 473-1905
EVA CAROL DOCKTER; 1425 IDAHO AVE S; ST LOUIS PARK; 546-3047; 6/6/70
JEFF ALAN DONARSKI; 910 ELLIOT AVE. S .; MPLS; 823-8854; 2/23/59
DINA DRITS; 11901 MEADOW LN.W.; MINNETONKA; 544-7667; 8/10/73
LINN ELIZABETH ENGLAND; 910 ELLIOT AVE. S.; MPLS; 343-4109; 5/18/70
WENDY JEAN FARRELL; 75 BIRCH BLUFF RD; EXCELSIOR; 476-0134
MEGAN JO FEENEY; 6305 WATERMAN AVE.; HOPKINS; 935-6416; 5/11/73
DIANA KAY FORD; 2660 HEMLOCK LN.; PLYMOUTH; 559-2436; 7/7/73
SARA BETTY FRANCK; 1812 WELLAND AVE.; MINNETONKA; 545-8526; 3/12/74
LISA LARAE FREIER; 3502 MAPLEWOOD CR; EXCELSIOR; 470-9288
STACY MARIE GABLES; 3901 MERRIAM RD.; MINNETONKA; 935-0077; 9/17/74
JULIE ANNE GOLDBERG; 2890 JEWEL LN.; PLYMOUTH; 473-8541; 7/19/73
BRIAN JOSEPH GROSAM; 776 HYACINTH CIRCLE; VICTORIA; 443-2214; 10/7/69
BRINA MICHELLE GROSSMAN; 2506 PINE CIR.; MINNETONKA; 591-1212; 6/17/73
ERICA LEE HANSON; 2400 INDIAN RD. W.; MINNETONKA; 544-8152; 6/30/73
TRICIA ANN HANSSEN; 17505 SADDLEWOOD LN; MINNETONKA; 931-2155; 2/6/69
HALEE F. HATLESTAD; 15308 WILLOWOOD DR.; MINNETONKA;934-6367; 3/3/73 .
AARON SHEA HAUCK; 114 18TH AVE. N.; HOPKINS; 938-0253; 7/17/73
STEPHANIE ANNE HENO; 2665 MAPLEWOOD CIR.E.; WAYZATA; 473-7155; 3/20/68
KRIS ANN HERBERG; 1907 WESTERN AVE.; GOLDEN VALLEY; 546-7929; 1/2/74
JOSH DAVID HILDRETH; 15050 WILLOWOOD DR.; MINNETONKA; 934-2785
KAREN MARY HILL; 3520 MONTGOMERIE AVE.; DEEPHAVEN; 473-3292; 6/16/69
DEBBIE NICHOLE HOLMBERG; 7395 PAULSEN DR.; EDEN PRAIRIE; 937-8256; 5/16/75
.
.
PHUONG THUY HUYNH; 130 RIDGEWOOD DR; HOPKINS; 935-3477; 7/29/71
MATT ROBERTO JACKSON 12205 PIONEER RD.; MINNETONKA; 933-5952; 2/16/73
MI..,LE MARIE JENSEN; 15900 POST RD.; WAYZATA; 473-3756; 12/30/72
D~ RACHELLE JENSON; 14610 44TH AVE. N.; PLYMOUTH; 559-5858; 6/28/72
CARRIE ELIZABETH JOHNSON; 6451 EVERGREEN CT.; EDEN PRAIRIE; 934-1166; 7/14/75
JENNY MAE JOHNSON; 4835 PILGRIM LN.; PLYMOUTH; 553-0146; 10/11/73
ANDREW JAMES JUSTUS; 721 6TH AVE. S.; HOPKINS; 938-9073; 12/7/71
LISA JO KAPUZA; 8750 SUSSET TR.; CHANHASSEN; 448-3472; 1/31/73
LAURA RENEE KLADT; 12924 JANE LN.; MINNETONKA; 933-4550
JULIE KLYUCH; 14130 CANARY LANE; MINNETONKA; 935-7400; 2/4/73
CRAIG HERBERT KOHORST; 17946 64TH AVE N; MAPLE GROVE; 420-2353
TONY JAMES KOPPENDRAYER; 910 ELLIOT AVE. S.; MPLS; 343-5063; 6/9/70
KAREN MICHELLE KORN; 33 14TH AVE. N.; HOPKINS; 936-0302; 7/31/71
LEAH MARRI LARSEN; 5638SANIBEL DR.; MINNETONKA; 936-0080; 2/12/73
ANETTE LEAVITT; 2061 UTAH AVE. S.; ST LOUIS PARK; 562-1024; 2/25/74
JENNIFER MARY LEE; 11539 RASPBERRY HILL RD.; EDEN PRAIRIE; 944-3399; 3/14/74
KERI MICHELLE LENZ; 5223 ROGERS DR.; MINNETONKA; 933-5377
JENNY JOE LYNCH; 5920 WOODLAND CIR.; MINNETONKA; 934-1981; 7/17/73
HEATHER P~INE MARIE SELSETH; 2346 SUMTER AVE. S ~; ST.. LOUIS PARK; 541-9424
STEPHANIE ANNE MCADAMS; 15 CREEKSIDE DR; LONG LAKE; 473-4627; 1/28/69
ROBERT BRUCE MCWHITE; 16307 HOLDRIDGE RD W; WAYZATA; 476-4769
SANDRA ANN MITLYING; 5101 BOARS HEAD RD., #212; MINNETONKA; 470-1424; 10/15/72
MELISSA JEAN MOHRENWEISER; 12772 GORDON DR.; EDEN PRAIRIE; 941-8937; 7/22/73
CHANDLER C. MURPHY; 725 NE LAKE ST; HOPKINS; 931-3185
DEBBIE ANNE MURRAY; 2331 RHODE ISLAND AVE. s. ; ST. LOUIS PARK; 544-6111 6/25/72
EMILY KATHERINE NEAS; 4615 WHITE OAK RD.; MINNETONKA; 938-2235; 5/3/76
MATT GUNNAR NELSON; 5302 KIMBERLY RD.; MINNETONKA; 934-3258; 8/5/72
B~ JEAN NELSON; 2885 WEST RD.; WAYZATA; 473-0887; 11/23/73
S ROBYN NODDLE; 4833 HIGHBURY LN.; MINNETONKA; 938-9308; 7/14/76
LI ANN OXBERRY; 3917 WILLOW RD.; BROOKLYN PARK; 421-8256; 6/26/69
AARON JOSEF PARADISE; 4025 TERRACE VIEW; PLYMOUTH; 559-1615; 2/10/72
PAUL ANDREW PERKINS; 4124 DVORAK RD.; HOPKINS; 938-0999; 11/12/74
JILL MARIE PETERSEN; 11013 N.OAK KNOLL TERRACE; MINNETONKA; 544-0247; 4/30/74
DEBBIE KAY PETERSON; 8216 WEST 30 1/2 ST.; ST LOUIS PARK; 933-6374; 12/20/72
JASON D. PIETRZAK; 5200 GLENVIEW DR.; MINNETONKA; 933-6027; 6/4/72
JENNIFER JOY PORTZ; 4371 WILSHIRE BLVD; MOUND; 472-0773
ERIKA LYN RASMUSSEN; 3701 FARMINGTON RD.; MINNETONKA; 938-8458; 2/12/73
ERIKA LYN RASMUSSEN; 3701 FARMINGTON RD.; MINNETONKA; 938-8458; 2/12/73
STACL LEA REZNER; 15807 DAWN DR.; MINNETONKA; 934-9694; 6/13/74
~ENNIFER LYNNE ROSEN; 6840 HAROLD AVE; GOLDEN VALLEY; 544-8881
CHRIS MARIE ROSENKAR; 2001 WESTWOOD HILLS DR.; ST. LOUIS PARK; 546-0361; 6/17/74
STEVEN VINCENT RUHR; 411 JEFFERSON AVE S; EDINA; 938-4048
SOSAMMA SAMUEL; 830 FOREST ARMS LN.; MOUND; 472-6431; 5/21/69
CHRIS MARGARET SCHNEIDER; 265 LAKEVIEW AVE.;TONKA BAY; 474-4484; 2/13/73
MIKE CHRISTOPHER SCHOWALTER; 16180 WESTGATE TR; EDEN PRAIRIE; 937-2180; 12/27/71
HEATHER ANN SEIFERT; 3724 INDEPENDENCE AVE. N.; NEW HOPE; 544-5406; 11/18/69
DIANA NATALIE SHAGALOV; 205 QUAKER LN; PLYMOUTH; 545-8270
DAVE JOSEPH SHAUR; 5328 YORK AVE. S.; MINNEAPOLIS; 922-6265
ANDREA LYNN SILBERMAN; 465 S. BROWN RD.; WAYZATA; 473-6400; 5/15/75
JUSTIN CAREL SMITH; 3625 GETTYSBURG AVE. S.#15; ST LOUIS PARK; 931-9087 5/19/74
TRACY LYNN SMITH; 13235 LAKE ST. EXT.; MINNETONKA; 933-2361; 5/2/90
WILLIAM ALBERT STARSHAK; 4852 WOODRIDGE CT; MINNETONKA; 938-8172
LAURA ANN STUART; 4728 E. COVENTRY RD.; MINNETONKA; 935-5749; 5/11/76
G~MARIE THORMAN; 15051 GATEWOOD DR.; MINNETONKA; 934-0423; 12/16/75
R ENNETH TOIVANEN; 5457 POMPANO DR. UNIT C; MINNETONKA; 933-5630; 8/14/74
ruMI ELIZABETTH TRENT; 6943 WOODLAND DR.; EDEN PRAIRIE; 934-1299; 9/14/72
ANGIE DAWN TUNGSETH; 15700 DAWN DR.; MINNETONKA; 934-8387; 10/4/72
.
.
HARLAN JOHN TWEED; 641 8TH AVE S; HOPKINS; 938-9210; 3/2/70
LISA MARIE VANDEHEI; 16930 27TH AVE N; PLYMOUTH; 473-2430; 4/23/71
KATIE JO VANTINE; 5705 VINEHILL RD.; MINNETONKA; 474-1627; 3/20/74 .
MELANIE A. WILHITE; 6050 RIDGE RD.; SHOREWOOD; 474-7445; 12/2/67
KENNETH JAMES WITSCHORIK; 17151 HAMPTON CT; MINNETONKA; 933-6153
ROXANA WOLF; 4244 UTICA AVE S; ST LOUIS PARK; 927-8742; 4/19/75
BRIAN JAMES WOOLSEY; 11180 LANEWOOD CIR.; EDEN PRAIRIE; 944-1895; 8/11/71
ROBERT MICHAEL WUJCIK; 725 LAKE ST NE; HOPKINS; 931-3158
JASON DANIEL YORAWAY; 14004 79TH AVE.; MAPLE GROVE; 420-8970; 10/28/72
GREG MICHAEL ZILBERG; 2006 LOUISIANA AVE. S.; ST. LOUIS PARK; 542-8049; 1/20/73
LORI JEANNE ZOHRBACK; 455 FARHILL RD.; WAYZATA; 473-8901; 9/7/
:VEHICLES
'85 RENAULT ALLIANCE; PKI 261
'87 SUZUKI SAMURAI; 558 CZF
'86 HONDA SIERA; 965 CKD
'84 RENAULT ALLIANCE; NDA 050
'89 VOLKSWAGEN FOX G/L; 539 EQX
'85 VW SCIROCCO; NYT 088
'83 TOYOTA GT; DYP 583
'79 CHEVROLET IMPALA; 871 DPY
'82 TOYOTA COROLLA; NDS 914 .
'81 OLDSMOBILE OMEGA; 612 DW
'81 TOYOTA COROLLA; 569 MSD
'82 TOYOTA SUPRA; 754 PMS
'86 OLDSMOBILE CUTLASS SIERRA; 181 RLA
'80 CHEVROLET CHEVETTE; COE 191
'86 HONDA PRELUDE; RHV 567
'79 FORD LTD WAGON; 697 CQT
'88 HUNDAI; 499 CTL
.
. MEM:lRANDUM
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE: August 10, 1990
ill: Gary R. Berger, Clerk Administrator
FRCM: catherine J. Iago, Deputy Clerk
RE: Request Increase in Election Judges Wages
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to Minnesota Elections laws section 204B.31, amended in 1987,
Compensation for Elections Services, all election judges must be paid ".. a snn
not less than the prevailing Minnesota minimum wage. . . " .
The city currently compensates elections judges in the amount of $3.55 per hour
and chairpersons are paid at $3.80 per hour. In order to comply with state law
and maintain the differential between the regular judges and chairpersons, I am
recorrnnending the following rate increased for 1990 election judges salaries:
Judges $ 3.95 per hour
Chairpersons $ 4.25 per hour
. I would also request that Dorothy Zehm and Charlotte McNiesh be retained for the
Prinary and General Elections days to serve as "Election Officials" at the $ .';.25
per hour rate. Both individuals have extensive experience and will be able to
answer inquiries from election judges and general public regarding the election
process.
Thank you for consideration of these requests.
.
1990 POTENTIAL ELECTION JUDGES LISI' BY PRECINCT
. PRECINCT 1 - PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF THE WAY, 3382 NO. LEXINGIDN AVE, SHORE\1IEW
TRISKO, Mary, 1460 Arden Oaks Drive, 633-5978 (Chair - 1988)
VIERATH, Margaret, 1169 Benton Way, 484-6964
BRITI, Joan, 1429 Arden Oaks Court, 636-9585
RICHTER, Elaine, 3552 Glenarden Road, 633-1169
NORDQUIST, Eloise, 1171 Tiller Lane, 483-5787
CARLSON, Sharon, 1392 Arden Place, 636-0263
MAIDNE, Karen, 1485 Dawn circle, 636-4748 (Transfer to Precinct 4)
HOU3H, Barbara, 1170 Benton Way, 490-0257 (Alternate - General 1988)
LYNCH, Mary, 3220 No. Hamline Avenue, 633-5535 (Alternate - 1988)
KRIVIT, Kim, 1252 Ingerson Road, 633-2218 (New)
RANALLO, Mary, 1355 Cummings Lane, (New)
. PRECINCT 2 - PRESBYTERIAN HOMFS/JOHANNA SHORES. 3220 lAKE JOHANNA BOULEVARD
KACHEL, Marilyn, 1479 Arden Place, 633-8752 (Chair - 1988)
ROACH, Ginny, 1628 Oak Avenue, 636-3379
WILLIAMS, Melve, 3355 Lake Joharma Blvd., 633-2717
~, Phyllis, 3261 Sandeen Road, 633-1784
KARNITZ, SUzanne, 1928 Glenpaul Avenue, 633-1972
ANDERSON, Eleanor, 1910 stowe Avenue, 633-1455
OPSAHL, Yvonne, 3471 siems Court, 633-1595
SEXTON, Marcella, 3300 Lake Johanna Blvd., 633-4786
LONGNEXJ(ER, Marcella, 1860 Grant Road, 633-5048
ANDERSON, Hazel, 3329 Katie Lane, 636-1629 (Alternate)
. BOTHOFF, Edith, 3220 Lake Joharma Blvd, (New)
SEIBER, Lydia, 3200 Shorewood Drive, 636-4294 (New)
KUI.MAN, Joann, 3279 North Snelling Avenue, (New)
MITCHELL, Carole, 3568 siems Court, 633-9629 (New)
1990 Potential Election Juges, Page 2
PRECINcr 3 - VALENTINE HIllS ELEMENrARY SCHOOL. 1770 W. ooUNTY ROAD E-2 .
KACALEK, Eunice, 1812 Gramsie Road, 633-5782 (Chair/General - 1988)
YAFKXJH, Betty, 1836 Gramsie Road, 633-8073 (Chair/Primary - 1988)
CRICHTON, Katharine, 1700 Valentine Avenue, 636-2999
PETERSON, Elnor, 1876 Grant Road, 633-2370 (P-2) (1988 General P-3)
TRISKO, Joan, 1460 Arden Oaks Drive, 633-5978 (P-1) (1988 Primary P-3)
FAY, Pearl, 1841 Gramsie Road, 633-9291
ANDERSON, Kathryn, 3988 Glenview Avenue, 631-0622
ZEHM, Dorothy, 4028 Fairview Avenue, 633-6155
YATES, Henry, 4042 Fairview Avenue North, 633-5740
SMITH, Kathleen, 4109 Valentine crest, 633-7601 (Alternate)
PRECINcr 4 - ARDEN HIllS CITY HALL. 1450 WEST HIGHWAY 96
BROWN, Kathleen, 1391 Arden View Drive, 633-6824 (Chair - 1988) .
HOWARD, Beverly, 1423 Arden View Drive, 631-1327
HAGKlJIL, Kathy, 1289 Karth Lake Circle, 633-0004
JOHNSON, Joyce, 4605 North Prior Avenue, 636-0553
KUEHN, Gloria, 3581 Ridgewood Road, 633-4061 (P-2)
BEGGIN, Nancy 4519 Lakeshore Place, 636-3494
Me NIESH, Charlotte, 3447 siems Court, 6331761
PAKOY, Carol, 1530 Highway 96, 633-6327 (Alternate)
Li'\WYER, Evelyn, 4547 Keithson Drive, 633-0198 (Alternate)
ANDERSON, Hazel, 3329 Katie Lane, , (P-2)
RIPKE, Bette, 1388 Arden View Drive, 631-3627
OLSON, Nancy, 4107 Gale Circle, 633-5884
OIT, Irene, 1394 Arden View Drive, 636-8505
.
LANG, Margaret, 4129 James Circle, 631-2958 (New)
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
MEMORANDUM
. =================================================================
DATE: August 8, 1990
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John T. Buckley, Parks Director
SUBJECT: National Conference
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Leisure in the 90's is the theme for the 1990 National Recreation
and Parks Association Conference. The Conference will be Oct. 12
- 15 at the civic Center in Phoenix, Arizona. (See attached
schedule of events) .
Conference cost will be as follows:
Conference Registration $285.00
Air Fare 277.40
Car Rental 145.00
. Meals & Miscellaneous 205.00
No hotel cost (will be staying with
daughter)
$912.40
Money has been budgeted for attending this National Conference.
ACTION REQUIRED:
If Council is amenable to my attendance at this Conference, they
should pass a motion, under Consent, authorizing an expenditure
of up to $912.40 for my attendance at this National Conference as
indicated above.
JTB:madlr
attachment
.
'"
.
TTTTTTTTTT~TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT~TTTTTVTTVVTTTVTTVTTVVTTTTTTTTTT
1990 CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION .
fOR RECREATION AND PARKS
SClfEDULE Of EVENTS
TtlURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY SUNDAY MONDAY
OCTOBER 11 OCTOBER 12 OCTOBER B OCTOBER 14 OCTOBER 15
M .'Kl.U)~;: 'j~t~~~~ll:;:,i~~~i!~~ i!~~t~i
0 "~~.,.~<""{,"',., i,fl~ 'l" "~"~.'"ll1";~Hr, ,'U'", :"NAS""Breakfast,>~,",,"l""';;'; ";~'" I',' ",";it<< l",~,.:"',olv""2:; ,<if ,15i","'~\;f;~';;"F;;;};
R
N
I
N
G
.
A
F
T
E
R
N
0
0
N
~."l~i ~,',~r,,~.,y.;,;y;,:), ' '""~'"4S'5 oit " "';",":;,,<,,/;, ' '''' "Y~t'" ~::" :~">$" :i.'ii~,1(,;,,~..*,;:r.";
~~~~, -' ~~f..~ '.~.~~\t~~~ ':1;~~k~~~~~:~J.'~~:t~~~~~~f~{~~~)~ f~~~f~~1]il;~;~.il~: ~~~f~l.i~fL~~
fa'"W~~ia i~~~~f~f~f~{;f~;~''t-~ :~f-~;~~: ~ ;~~: ~;j;f~,~t::\:~'r.~;: _~
E t(~ll(,wJ,l:SN*~~'~,,%"ilr~l;: ~G'":. fl'~"vl.z(:g, ~fii.'l~t,/,~ Bi.~ 'l~ B "/' t' ~ f {~.~"
;Doca11tl6"st~Ff,",::'*~;, ~!l~I;~{~'1'ri{.,_~j-;: ~~ ~ r~n<:. a~q~~'t,~ ".~"~: f'
V ~~-t~j,.-"'t~ ~~~l '"'''' SeS$IOn~ :f. it''!)'' j" ~ ,><:...';f~;{td-;;",~:' <'Ii "J'i~:;,r:. ~,..,;" ~i" <1,
1].mgfSOClalq~gm.:~ ~-, ':.'~"':t""P~~~lr~.;:;~I"';lt ;:03", ~~.'"'. .j ,,,,<~Y>' ;;i;~;t Zr ?
E ~.. ,~~t~V~1!,.~ iO.in:.W~f;'f<!r. :A~~~B!,! ~p_e~lat~;-t1~t. : c"
N "Jantah,~n:~~~~ ~t ~.. ~ ~:{~fl~<;;<0 c:Event~(Rawhide)':;:~~" 'i'~,~:5.'~\
"'<~\'l~!!jq ~~~ 'f. ~;f'",,;:t: ,~, ,~. I >""";>" . '''' ,'" '~i] .~,,"i'
':<;onc~r!~1.~m:5:J~;~~ ~NREA.'ORer1jl}g;,,,~,~I.~ '6~OO-10:00'p m . .' :t/ .~~ .
I "''''i'::tj<;'''' ",-.' .,*":t'-1~ ";',",<l:":';:'~~~*,:/f;"i,. "r'~ " ~ _, ,,,oi: /' ~ '"""
\630-1' c30,R,n~,,~)(' lfSoctali"'r /:},%\'l.{l,JP":.\ '~'" ~_;,"'-.; :v ',;~, ::',;"c ~
N "~1-i!J'l;\>>:~~f1l ~,... ,:<~~.i(>;!" ""'''-~(1J'~::';';:~'' "Ai 'v~ '."
:*Il']'.:~i~- tI~'~~,1i, ...'t";'Z!~"<f:ff ,,7,OO~9 OO~p~m'., Jet),:~ NRP,h Dance - ~"_-.J".:.'f.,
'1jhr.?~~jI<~010*~* If'':.'4.<<;{:~ -; {:";; ,;;'~ "~,, 11\,1 ; '. '~, ~ -:: " i'" ',' 'jc ,-
G ~_s\~J,:.<"f!,__~~~~.",:o.M,.~.:-. :iwl ";f ~~ ]",:" G ~,'";. :v,' (Sponsored by ,
i~~~,~tri"i1~~:'ij,; 4i~6N~,i;t~::',,: ,,:" Student Blanch) ,,' .
Please check the pages of this brochure for specific delails on edUCation programs, [he exhibit hall, on-
site institutes, guest and youth lours, local host actiuities and social elJents,
Pt10ENIX!3
. .--... . --- - .
!',..,' " , -
. -. . . - , .."
. July '10, 1990
TO: Arden Hills City Council
Subject: Arden Hill's City Hall Committee report
The City Hall Committee's charter of evaluating the present City
Hall facilities has been under way for four months. This evalu-
ation has taken the form of fact finding efforts. These efforts
include reviewing the present needs of the city Hall as presented
by the city's staff and evaluating the physical conditions of the
facilities. Visits to other City Hall facilities, with associ-
ated City Hall personnel were also completed. The committee has
reviewed future community needs and growth potentials with Metro
area professionals.
The evaluation has provided the committee with a foundation for
continued review of City Hall hcili ty requirerner.ts. with the
pending completion of the Arden Rills residents' survey and con-
tinued facilities review, the City Hall committee recommends that
we continue the evaluation. The oommittee has targeted year end
. for a final recommendation.
Sincerely,
Michael G. Olson
Secretary, City Hall Committee
.
Page 1
. MEMJRANDUM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE: August 9, 1990
TO: Mayor and Council
F'RCM: Gary R. Berger, Clerk Administrat=
RE: Rescind Action on Cleveland Avenue Assessment Hearing
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At the Regular Council meeting held July 30, action was taken to schedule
an Assessment Hearing for the Cleveland Avenue improvements.
since the meeting date, staff has had discussions with Council and the
Consulting Engineer and it was determined the levy of assessments for this
project should be post-paned until such time as discussions are held with
property owners in the area regarding the level of participation in
assessment costs.
As a "housekeeping" measure, it is recornmerrled that Council rescind
previous action to schedule the public hearing.
. ACl'ION RIDUIRED:
Council should pass a motion to rescind the previous action by Council, at
their Regular Meeting held July 30, which scheduled an assessment hearing
on the Cleveland Avenue Improvement Project, on Tuesday, August 28, 1990,
at 7:30 p.m., at city Hall.
.
.
.
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
MEMORANDUM
. -----------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
DATE: August 10, 1990
TO: Mayor and city Council
6
FROM: '"' Gary R. Berger, city Administrator
SUBJECT: Request For Final Payment for HRS Construction Co.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Attached please find a letter from Darrell Oman recommending
final payment to HRS Construction company, as well as approval of
a change order ($1,260) due to additional costs incurred in
removing concrete hold-downs.
Mr. Oman recommends that a final payment be made to HRS in the
amount of $2,840, which includes $1,260 for the change order.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that a final payment in the amount of $2,840 be
authorized for HRS Construction Company for completion of the
. underground storage tanks excavation work at the Kem Milling
site.
ACTION REQUIRED:
If Council concurs with the staff recommendation, they should
authorize an expenditure of $2,840 payable to HRS Construction
Company, as a fina~ payment for underground storage tank removal
and related work at the Kem Milling site.
GRB:madlr
attachment
.
- ------.--
.
.
Client: Village of Arden Hills DELTA ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSULTANTS, INe.
Address: 1450 West Highway 96 1801 Highway 8 . Suite 1.
St. Paul, MN 551
Arden Hills, MN 55112 612/636-2427
Attention: Mr. Gary Berger Date: August 9, 1990
SUneONTRACTOR INVOIeE REVIEW FORM
Project Name: KEM Milling
Project Location: Arden Hills, Minnesota
Delta Project No": 10-89-385.01 Client No.: NIA
ISSUE PAYMENT TO:
Subcontractor Name: HRS Construction, Inc.
Subcontractor Address: 23605 County Road 10, Loretto, MN 55357
Invoice Date: July 3 and 6, 1990 Invoice Number: N/A
Amount of Invoice: S1.580.00 and S1,260.00 Date Received: July 6, 1990
Activity Code: 205 State Reimbursement Code: N/A .
Description of Work Performed by Subcontractor
1. Completion of USTs excavation work
2. Invoice for S1,260 submitted by HRS was expected due to additional costs incurred in removing concrete
hold-downs.
Payment Recommendation --.K.. Full Payment _ Partial Payment
If partial payment, recommended payment amount:
Reason for partial payment:
If you have any questions regarding this invoice review form, please contact me at 612/636-2427.
Sincerely,
DELTA ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, me.
/ .
! , /~)
/ . ,/l U(- /
,:::<~<i2A/(Aj/(;/ / //14'A~
Darrell J" Oman {/
Environmental Assessment Manager
100713-89
. HHb (;onstruclion Inc
. 23605 County Rd,' J ~
Loretlo, MN 55357 "
..-....
. r
DELrfl ENVI/(tJAlIYUNTI1/.. "I
COfl)$ULrA,vTS" IAJ(-.
J gO I Hwy, ~ S u~re # II~
5 r. P flU/. fY);tI, SS/I~
L I
'"^" RETu'N THO' 51OJ' WITH ,,'", -1
1- -~ - ..... . . . ",,"^" ,""^,,,,,,,""""~' ""'".
I )(UI1 mU<","6 - tl~OEAJ /I;;us IYI ?,.f; I'
I ,AI. ili
. ' ~,
I F","~' BntZ:,VG' I
, ~
~
C $ ~
oNrf:l.flC T IS; 800,06 ~
;If 1C
. I 'ToT", Duo 1,520.00 I
~
r "I ,t;;
DELTI1 E Al/l.rR6NI1E/tIT/lL
Co~s~kr~>>r5/~M~'
ISO/ IIwY'. 9 .5 l/IrE #/1,..,
L5T. 'PIN/'-/ /!'lA). 5'51):l... -.J
PLEASl ~ET\,lM~ lHI~ ~lUB Wl1H YOUR Re,..,InAI'.KL 'l':'I.JR (".l(.ElLE[) (HEel(, 15. tDJI< U(lIf'T,.
"' '", ~ ~c"~.~.~"~'~ ~r-= ~~ ~ ~- ~"-.--~"~."~,-- "". "-"~ "- .:"
lYE'" /Il;J:tuW. ,/lAMA) h!t:tI..5./IlAJ. 9 -6 -90 I
r ' \ff:
" R~ ~~~~k;J!
~." *
;)l
.;I' ";
A~ - ~V.12 .An.t..<!.~;lOO.OO == 900,O~
300 13~- 3~' @. "t~O,oo -::. :360.00!. I
~, !
ol', i
'il, I
1M [)..v.R-. ~ I ;;tbo .~~~ ,
. I
I ~
I ,
I
~
~
?if.:.
::&
~
- ~
'S;:
lh
~:'i
!'f;:
COuNCIL HnWT~ ~ _ DATE PAGE
-&2:':- . ~ ~..
f/oJ~ /'10 ! '4,
-
"-
-
~~/t;~-~~~-
-
-
-
"
~6~
-----~
,joved: (l1AYOR SATHER) COUNCILMBR: (HANSEN) (MALONE)
Seconded: (11AYOR SATHER) COUNCILHBR: (HANSEN) (HALON".
THAT COUNCIL: . ~ ~
,~g;~
/ lIA~p -- - --------
VOTE: AYES: NAYS: ____
'L _________"""_"__"________~
Ea~se~n----~1~io-r=;_(: ---S~1tl~e-;:----- H~,nsen Ha10nc Sather
. Growe l:iahO'i.Jdlcl CrOyle l'1ahm.J2.1d
ABSTAIN: _"._ TOTAL: ( )
Hansen Malone Sathel: Crot-;e !"];:111o,.mld Ayes NflYS Abs.
A.LSO PRESENT: CJ.k/ Adminis trB tor i\ C!: ,) r-Ilc:/ _ ____________.Tl-e~~suTcr._________ Engince 1 _______
Parks Direc tor___...____~Pub. \.Jks. Supervi.sor Plilnne.r Dep. elk
:'.
COUNCIL UlNU~ ,,/) ..~ DATE PAGE
SUBJECT: !ll- ftP-// S tLL__d
. DISCUSSION: "_"
~~/'tf Sil(J+~~~.~-
~~~#:;~d --1 St//-
~ ~~'i<;<lb - c(" ~,,~~
- ?
..
~
-
--
~1 " ;- --
., J!1JA.J
." ~
"[.. / (.. .v~ ~ ..: _
~ ~--d!-=.- ~~~
Hoved: .cl:'.cAYOR SATHER) COUNCILHBR: (HANSEN) ((0L'~ (GROIvE) ,. t1cHAHOIVALD)
Seconded: (l'JAYOR ~Eli.) COUNCILHBR: (HANSEN)(~!XC6i'i6. C"GROT1EJ:'::>
THAT COUNCIL/'J _- -if-----
/
VOTE: AYES: NAYS:
I-L::.nsen Malone Sa ther Hansen Halone Sa ther
. Gro',.;re Mahm.-rald Grm'Je Haho~"ald
ABSTAIN: _
- -------.---.----..-.--.----------------
Hansen Malone Sa ther Growe ~1aho\..Jald
ALSO PRESENT: elk/Administrator Allorlley
pa~k~ Directo.r. ~ :::ks. ~up~__
~ ---"~ ~
! :'.
H ~- -
~---~'<J/~ ____nn___ -
~ ~ I -
~ -11A-~(,Pit-- ~..,p; r r@!
. ~. i/ . ""'--
I' ~~---
~&^ @(-~'H" - ·
~_/~-~"d-~' .
._~L& ,-7 .~
( "
j.~-- / -
~~~. --_/
"~".
~ ~~ !LP
/ /JJ'f{ ~ IY.;:;'; - ~ d--
~ wdi ~t tt- ~_.G --
~': U2 ~ ...
~I --:-.;- -'-'~ - ~
! ~U;f!UF>G wJr. 1 ~ G --
J ~ ~ (
(i~~ 'jill ·
-m~fv .
~~~~ ----
(,) u
1~ l' J" ~
,I -iJ/;tl ~ .~~U;P -.
\,./. ,-trt ,I .' l '
. . .1.' r~~
~"~"")~ w~ pc II, ~
'{ jt1J.-r..4\"tJri~~~
v YJ..v1, u. .
\ \ -
:,~"w~~~~' if
Y' ", ~J5lb r
l - ./"- I
~~ ~ cJc"'r;.c~9-/ ·
/ .' -
t' f
i 1"..1
V
1~- ~ ~ /&J
. 11 Uh- ~. ~/ '-- ""
~ . 3 ~ tJi^-.. ~ t&u. ~
~~ ~& ~ crr-~
. ----
!
0
/\-.-- ....-~.- ~
~-~ ~ ~-C;:~~J;k;~-
W ri "
': n ~
114 t.lf7WL ~ ~ -
G- ,- .' 'fL~~
tJU +, t1# Mt;j ,Wdt ~ -
. I;UJ--
r., /- d tf1U
~--
~ ~--~
.
---.-.--...-----
C',~U''''ll "'IN'\T'I'''" DATE PAGE .~
"~"c '''" , 'oJ ~__
SUBJECT:_____" "____ ""_"_n_____""""______
/11 CUSSlON: r-j _~_____________ .
( 1/ __ /
(
""".W ~~
ffiI2 . YO (! ,
-
-
. ~
~jrJ<
"',
i/O =e
~' ~
V _ /.'/1
~ -. ~ 1j~-~, "2/0. ..
~~{o ~~~ ~ h1~-
~~. ~~ -cL~-~ -
~ /LPkRh~~{!~-f+- '-f--~-e -okl- _.___
oved: {MAYO SAT~ER) COUNC1LMBR: (~ANSEl~) (":!~ONE) (GROPE) (HAHO\/ALD)
econded: (HAYOR SATH2R) COUNCILMBR: (H!~)!S ~;n (HALONE) (GROh1E) (~rAHm\JALD)
HAT~II
, Q:/~-
- , . -- -- ---- .---- "-----..- --~---,-
l' "'.'--.. - -- -JA"ff/ --, -_.__,."_"um "."~r--+~.'" ""--, "___"n
~,~..r?tX "n' , ~ 611-
-~." ',~-- ".,., . >rf~:,*, .' / . .
.t,~ y,-- - ," j'"" V . TY\'S'
/V.(J'l :e,o"__"____ '_ N,," "__" ,
HaDsen Malone S~~ the.r H<:-1n~n Halonc. Sa tner
Growe NahOl,ald Gro\Oe Mahowald .
ABSTAIN:_"_" ",____ TOTAL: (__ )
Hansen Malone Sa ther GroTHe HahoHald Ayes Nays Abs.
ALSO PRESENT; Clk/Admini,stratol"________ __ _ !\ttorlley __ ________.'J'reasurc.r___ Eng1neer_____
Parks Director___._,_Pub. 'h1](s. Supervisor Pldnner_~__Dep. elk
;;,-.........__.....-:-,.....~.........".',~........' ...:_~,'...
COUNCIL HINUTE~ fIa '() f PAGE
SUBJECT:
. DISCUSSION: I
~.-_.
-
~~ l &; /Y-(~
-
U-()
/
(/'0:', i (~ "' (- ~;,
(I/--L - 6~ 7/ -
,
,
~:!Pm--~--(j cJ/~~ ~-
~~-C~1-~D ~H -
-
-
-
tW ~())1 -- - ~---
-
Hovec.: (ljP,YOR SATHER) COUNC ILHBR: (HANSEN) (GRmvE) (HAH ,-
Seconded: (HAYOl~ SATHER) COUNC rUlER: (HANSEN) O'L'\ ..ONE) (GRONE) , IAHO\-lAL
'".^' 'O"'''7:~~ r~ _ ~ --'
:ve ---~
e ~--"---~L;~/f6-________~=-_
--~----- ------~ -- 7:J
VOTE _ AYES _ __"__""""______"____"___ NAYS: _"_
Hansen Malone. S~ c:.r Hansen Halone SatheT
. Gro'Hc H2hmv2.1d Gruh7e Mahm~'ald
ABSTt\IN: _.___..____...__________u_____ TOTAL: ( )
-~'-'--~-'~~-
IJar:sen Malolle Sather GroHc l-Iahowald Ayes Nays '!\bs.
ALSO PRESENT: elk/Administrator At -:"OJ Cley Treasurer Engineer
---- ----
Parks Director Pub. '~7ks. Supervisor -_..._--~ Planner Del'" elk
---.-------.---.-
-----
~.~.~~~
c- ~
~--fl ~ri!u~
,~~) --' ~ .
/ -
."
/
/
If'
- !!vd~' -, -~ -
&!~ ,
. ~-
IU/ (1 ~ it ;;0
~----~~ .
/ ........, -
~ ttJ~
.
~
f ~. , /
, . j
, l
.
" -
COUNCIL HlNUTES &u- ~ om ~"~
SUBJECT:
ft!~~~f~' ~>~~ hI-~
.---
- ~
n-
-
~rrt-3
~ ~~ ~-
. :;~A~
nur- hovlif: ~ -
-
fA,I12e/t
3 ~~
-
j ti
/2A-~~~ ~. ~~;~ ---
J1zl/A~;:-~ w~ -
/
(1\:oL!3 OL- :? 7'-4::)---.---.-- ..-
,joved: .ll1i\YOR SATHER) COUNCILMBR: (HANSEN) ((NALONl0'~ (GROHE) (HAHOI,ALD
....------,....-.....-..-.- .-.
Seconded: (bjAYOR SATHER) COUNCIUlBR: (HANSEN) (l-IALONE) - (GROHE) IAHOi-!ALD)
THAT COUNCI~. .~ ()_ J1t _~ r3 ~, 7'~. ~ ~_~
· 7< ~ ;; 1+- ~ ~_#L :-~-!f'!:~
._ 0<- 3 ~ _ ~ 1" ______" .
AYES: NAYS: ~
Hansen Malone Sa ther -- 1121158n Halonc Sa thcr
. Growe Hahm~lald GroHe Na hm.Ja ld
ABSTAIN: TOTAL: ( - - )
-... -
I.Jansen HaloDe Sather Growe ?<laho'wald Ayes Nays Abs.
ALSO PRESENT: elk/Administrator ptt ()1l1e:'____~ TreasuTer ~~_Eng]n('er_ "______
-----.-.,--
Parks Director Pub. '~ks. Supervisor Plzmner Dep. elk
l'
r
wehrman
. PLANNING MEMO bergly
To: Arden Hills Planning Commission lIlCl5ciates
From: Wehrman Bergly Associates, Inc.
John Bergly, Planning Consultant
Subject: Case #90-10
Minor Subdivision of Lot 6, Barstad ~ivision n. plaza bldg., ste. 220
and Lot Area Variance for Two of the Three Lots 5217 wayzata blvd.
Applicant: James A. Meyer, Attorney for Estate minneapolis, mn 55416
of Bernice Medlin 6125447576
Date: August 1, 1990
REQUEST:
Lot 6 is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Hamline
Avenue and Amble Road. The lot is 13B feet wide by 297 feet deep and
contains 40,986 square feet. The proposal is to divide the parcel into
three lots. The westerly lot (A) contains a small residence, is 14,766
square feet in area, and meets area, width and depth requirements. Lot
B, the center lot, and Lot C, the easterly lot, each contain 13,110
square feet (14,000 square feet required) and meet the lot width and
depth requirements. The requested variance is for reducing the required
lot area by 890 square feet for Lots Band C.
CONSIDERATIONS:
. 1. Lot A, being a corner lot, is required by the subdivision ordinance
to be 10 feet wider than normal. It is proposed to be 12 feet
wider to allow for a 10-foot side yard from the existing residence.
The existing garage and "breezeway" would be removed.
2. Lots Band C would have to be nine feet deeper (147.4 feet instead
of 138.0 feet) to meet the minimum area requirement of 14,000
square feet.
3. The variance provisions for subdivisions are somewhat less
restrictive than those for zoning variances, i.e.:
(1) There are special circumstances or conditions
affecting said property such that strict
application would deprive the applicant of
reasonable use of his land.
(2) The variance is necessary for the preservation and
enjoyment of a substantial property right of the
applicant.
(3) The granting of the variance will not be injurious
to the public welfare or injurious to other nearby
property owners.
. (All three must apply.)
planning . landscape architecture
,
. It further says that the council , in making this
finding, shall consider the nature of the proposed use
of land and the existing use of land in the vicinity,
the number of persons to reside in the proposed
subdivision, and the probable effect of the proposed
subdivision upon traffic conditions in the vicinity.
All of these conditions could probably be considered reasonably met
in the proposed variance; but the primary objective of the proposed
variance is to increase the value to the estate.
4. The immediate neighborhood consists of a number of irregular
conditions--lots left over when adjoining parcels were subdivided,
a cul-de-sac at the end of Amble Road with a garage that abuts the
cul-de-sac, wetlands that abut building sites, variety of lot
sizes, and mixture of home styles and ages. (Lots 4 and 5,
directly east of the subject lot, are each 82.5 feet wide by 138
feet deep, for a lot. area of 11,385 square feet, so they are about
2,000 square feet less than lots Band C in the proposal). "The
existing use of land in the vicinity" is one of the considerations
mentioned in the variance provisions above.
CONCLUSION:
The primary questions remain:
. 0 If we reject the variance and reduce the division to two lots
instead of three, are we denying the applicant a substantial
property right or depriving him of reasonable use of his land
because of the total site being 1,000 square feet under size?
0 If we accept the variance, are we causing injury to the public
welfare or nearby property owners?
If the variance is approved or denied, reasons for the action should be
itemized. If the variance is granted, conditions should be attached as
fo 11 ows :
1. That the present driveway access to Hamline Avenue be removed as
the new 10t.(Lot A) will front on Amble Road.
2. That util ityand drainage easements be provided to the City as
required by the City Engineer.
3. That the City Attorney and Engineer approve of the subdivision
documents to be filed with the county.
4. That park dedication fees be paid to the city prior to issuance of
building permits.
NOTE: Another alternative would be to approve the variance with the
. condition that the existing dwelling be razed. The City would be
allowing three lots where technically only two would meet all
ordinance requirements; but the city would also be eliminating a
LIllo CASE #90-10
PAGE 2 OF 3
. dwelling that is the smallest remaining old dwelling on Hamline
that is not compatible with all the newer and larger homes in the
area. Razing this house would allow the corner lot to be 105 feet
in width and would then require a lot area variance of 752 square
feet for Lots Band C.
.
.
nOOn CASE #90-10
PAGE 3 OF 3
. "- 'I 0 ...
~ ~J ,
. (i) 2- 0,) 5 ~ -
~3 'lIQ.,.
&) (;J l~. 00
1 41 <J ~ ~fJ V >20
I ~1., ... O~ J.... ~
,,< r\ 0 5"+ "
",l- N 0
rfu) 0 " ;;, (; "
OS ~ -.J
~ <> , !-.
-~--~"l- _r ~ (~,'t ' e6zJ ~ .)
'~r:E.!.. 1
20 _ (3) 0
." 21 .
:. ~ 7 "
"'OR,T r< I ,- '"
.';, CST IJPO,T/O,y I 101." ""
,"
\ ~.) ,.
1 '" 2.2.
.; .
'. 0
<,,,)
1,'0 r' 2.3
0'
'f.- .,
.. ,
. -:r5~" ."' ,-,
,- (I)
'" .,,1
J~):}. f:i N
;. .~~ rr ;,. .' ,", 73....
~1
~l!!!d OS
.~.. ..... ...."'0).
"\ >'~'. '. ..... ..,
''-i,,: ,~<'i! .'-1o.c.. '~W
1 t - c-.
ill
.f ,~~J;; ; , I III (3)
4'..... F '" t
, ~ ;~;~:~~'ifJ)'''' , ''"
f, ....,:;.,..~- , (8"'7.2.~' ~5' i~2:
, ~ ....z.cJ..C..
,. '.; ,
~~;, ~ ~
. 01 <- 1 l 0
0 ~ (41 ~ t 3
~t.o, <..'~ ~.:).. ,," "
)~.?;,.?~".~ 0' 18'1. }a' ...l '" (j.i)
'"
~ -- ~ . - I 0
:,~':\ ,~
oJ,
~~~: I
- &~.,,'
\~(.., '>. ~) (53)
'" '", ...
.. ~ '" .
~ I
0 ~ o ~
0, S . l1:!2
4 ~ 2 '
" 8'9.,,' _,.: _41
"
~2200) 1.2;5.'-1 1'+.o:OoS Its 'IJ .. l!~,~J'l
.
.~7"-C.- '-~~~~ ~ L "," ... ~
1 ~ t ~ { -
~ N ~..,..., - I
. 51.0::"'1:'\ Q: ~ 4
~ (Z-Y l;t ;;; :
00
/4. I 1
-- -
.810,.0c... ..; HILL 2 ' ,
, "
~ <04 " ."
, 0 ~ .' (") 3 N ~
~ <:r 00 , '"
" '0 "' II 12 ~ 13
I . 9 -
~ (3.) ;:, ~
l I " 11't,7. (io 113,0" '0, '0' '04 ,~, /4Z-. ,
,. _ ,gO"",~ /,;" 11 I -." ++O.~~ -f~::
~ 00 I \ll \ ~ ^' CE@ N"
00 "' ~
- (40) '<it \ '" L3~.".c. -1.-,
"' ." - (4-1) ""
.o~I~/53".j,' -_ ns'~'
'. 4&) , ~~)-l":
042 - I ~ (,,"3)3 035 cD 11
OD (0 0 00 '"
~1 .+,,,,,. .53'JU..'-:;'1'
- . I IA-Zo' ""
.0' 110' /5S,D3,'
'" r.~ /::. r.....f L. j ;-".1 ~~. ROAD F: t ! ~., C. r.:.
'"
""In.a" (E) 5 S!'_-H,b'l.T.OI' (s-l;l ~- ""'m." \a " 2'31.01 ' -..,
~ 5 C@ , Q 'I!J " ~ 0'. 9"~ \ ' (58) ..,
,.J 0 0 {)tI I I .00 ~ OQ '"1'\01 (57) ~ (5') (~O) 32
~ (f) (52..) Il" \ ~. 7 0 "'" [I.l 1.91 J(..
~I 'i. .~~,J.c',!" __" . BID ~.c. ~ . "'!t3u.-:- r- ...:.. .7:3lt. .. ,
:II ',-h, e' " ID" -. rn ~ 9 r; 10 ,
'"
.. lO2.",.8~1 _ rJ o;c/ (O~ ~ '" ,
\.29J ~ N I
~ (54) e I"~O "'" :c
,;~.. !2
~ ,."
1"":" '4_. '0' -li:-;' u :'7.2:. ~$'---- ''''.za
,..", 1.z.2a..o,....- (Ozo)
, m ,
- - ~
.
. NE 22 30 23
From the office of
(linlifiraf2 GEORGI- SCHMIDT & ASSOC. INC.
3092 No. Lexington Ave.. Roseville, Mn. 55113
LAND SURVEYING
. ltf ~1tt'it~ 483-4408
I Hereby Certify that this plat shows a survey made by me of the property
described on this plat. ~aH~e~re-cor~Hy-placed-85-shown-;
that this survey, plan or report WJ5 prepared b~' me, or under
Job Number: 4055 my direct supervision; and that I a.m a du~y registered land
SlltVeyor under the Laws of the State of t'llnnesota.
Surveyed For James A. Meyer By ~~f2J
Date 7/5/90
Scale l"M 11n. Registration No. i0459
OESCRIPTION: (Total) Contains 40986 sq. ft.
Lot 6, Barstad Addition.
Ramsey County, Minnesota
DESCRIPTION: (After proposed Lot Spl it)
parcel A: Contains 14766 sq.ft.
Lot 6, Borstad Addition, Except the East 190 feet thereof.
Ramsey County, Minnesota
Parcel 8: Contains 13110 sq.ft.
The West 95 feet of the East 190 feet of Lot 6, Borstad Addition.
Ramsey County, Minnesota
Parcel C: Contains 13110 sq.ft.
The East 95 feet of Lot 6, Borstad Addition.
Ramsey County, Minnesota
. Request approval to split lot into 3 parcels as shown and described.
Vari ances requested on square footages for Parcel s "8" and "ell from
, 14000 sq. ft. to 13110 sq.ft.
!;; 3~
89" ig' . 2g7.01
I W }07,01 ~ C:!s 9S a~
I => -
Z ,"Q,r~'" ~-Ir'l 0 ",-"
W !+5li". - (R<z,...o"~J 0 0"
>~ .0
n' ::1/'103 ,.,
<t:- .. - ~<::)
'" .."All ~ ~ "
. ,tB~' 0) ~~"
w~ .. 1-0 + S"
-- M N
Z' 1'f)7bC"s1 W, aT 6 - f<:- '? ,.,
0 0
:::::;~ (~; 110 ""liB' q? 13Jll,,~fiL. ~
~z '"
<t:
I lOb. 9 :J '15"
,
N 89" iQ 07 W 2ga.gQ
I AMBLE ROAD
I <:l (J
'-0 \l)
:n :>3
COUNCIL mNUTE~~ ~ DATE PAGE
~ O.ul1fl(J
SUBJECT: "~
. DISCUSSION:
-
-
-
rJzO~ M~ OL: ~p~
~ 2- . (,M.--.:L .p-
~~ -~ k~.~ -~Af2~
---"
"--
~~-'-
--" -
Hove.d: (l1AYOR SATHER) COUNCILMBR: (HANSEN) (MALONE) ( GRm,E) (HAHm, ALD)
Seconded: (l'jAYOR SATHER) COlJNClLHBR: (HANSEN) (~vjALONE) (GROHE) (MAHOHALD)
THAT COUNCIL:
--'-
-_._-----_.-.-------- ------~---~------- . -~---~------_._----
---,--- .__._--~--.--
VOTE: AYES: NAYS:
--~- 1'1a10nc. Sathe.r
Hansen Malone S~1l::1er Hansen
. Growe Ma hm,ld ld GroHe MahoHald
ABSTAIN: TOTAL: ( )
Hansen Malone Sather C;ym.Jc H::hoc!21ld Ayes Nays At,:, .
ALSO PRESENT: elk/Administrator Attorney Treasurer Engineer
Parks Director Pub. i.\n:s. Supervi:;or ~-- Planner Del'. elk
----~---~--~-
.
,
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
. MEMORANDUM
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
DATE: August 10, 1990
TO: Mayor and city Council
FROM: &13 Gary R. Berger, city Administrator
SUBJECT: Draft zoning Districts for the Lexington/Fox
Business Center
-------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
Attached please find a memo from Planner Bergly outlining
recommendations for changes to the Lexington/Fox Business Center
zoning district which the Planning commission reviewed at their
August 1st meeting.
Planner Bergly will be present at the August 13 Council meeting
to review the recommendations and answer Council questions.
ACTION REQUIRED:
. Please review this material and be prepared to discuss your
thoughts and concerns on Monday evening.
GRB:madlr
attachment
.
.
. wehrman
. MEMORANDUM bergly
To: Mayor and City Council llQQE)iates
From: John Bergly, Planning Consultant
Wehrman Bergly Associates, Inc.
Date: August 13, 1990
Subject: Lexington/Fox Business Center n. plaza bldg., ste. 220
Draft Zoning Districts 5217 wayzata blvd.
minneapolis, mn 55416
6125447576
At its August I meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed, made some
modifications to and recommended that the draft zoning districts be sent
to the City Council for action, directing the Planning Commission to
hold the necessary public hearing(s). The planning report was
previously approved by Council for processing through the plan approval
process (public hearing, Metropolitan Council review, adoption by the
City Council).
To aid those of you who reviewed the first draft a month or so ago, the
changes or additions are noted as follows:
Page I--Changed (l),(b), through (l),(f): Used"... in the district... "
instead of "in the vicinity" or "on adjoining lots."
Added last line in (3),(b).
Page 2--Changed (4),(d): Was "Miscellaneous towers."
. Added (4), (e) .
Added to (5) ,(f): "...or other..." to end of sentence.
Page 3--Changed (7): To include "Site Features."
Page 4--Changed (I),(c): " ...or highways and in areas... "
Page 5--Added to (4),(b): Limitation to eight rental/lease vehicles;
and reference to other service station requirements.
Page 6--Changed (4),(f): Was "Miscellaneous towers" now "Satellite
antennae...premises."
Page 7--Changed (7): Same change as in I-Flex District.
Page 8--Changed (I),(c): Added criteria for free-standing, single-
occupancy buildings.
Page 9--Changed (4),(e): Was "Miscellaneous towers" now "Satellite
dishes...height."
Page IO--Changed (6): Entire paragraph has been replaced.
Page II--Changed (7): Same change as in I-Flex and B-3 Districts, plus
we included language from GB District for the various site
. features. (This is the only one of the new Lexington Avenue
districts that has enough space to benefit from unified
control of the site features.)
planning . lanascape architecture
.
. At the back of the ordinance are several graphics relating to the
proposed ordinance amendments:
l. Land Use Plan
2. Potential Development or Redevelopment Parcels
3. Existing Zoning (Note, the four parcels south of the railroad that
are proposed to be rezoned from 1-2 to B-2.)
4. Proposed Zoning for the three districts defined in this memo
5. Development Concepts for the proposed R-4 District (Shows some of
the possibilities for developing a retail center with other retail
sites. )
.
.
lJQOo PAGE 2 OF 2
. PROPOSED I-FLEX OISTRICT ORDINANCE
Lexington/Fox Business Center
(1) Purpose The I-Flex District is established to:
(a) Implement that part of the Arden Hills Comprehensive Plan
known as the Lexington Avenue Business Area Plan.
(b) Preserve, protect, enhance and perpetuate existing develop-
ment in the district.
(c) Attract new development that is compatible with existing
development in the district in terms of use, performance,
character, quality and appearance of building and sites.
(d) Permit only those uses that will have traffic generation
characteristics that are compatible with existing development
in the district and that will ensure reasonable traffic
operation on streets in the vicinity.
(e) Encourage new site development that will be compatible with
existing site development standards of existing development in
the district.
(f) Promote flexibility in land uses and site development stan-
dards to achieve the objectives of the I-Flex District.
. (2) Procedure The application and the administrative and review
procedure established in Section VIII,C, Special Use Permits, shall
be followed for all development that involves new building
construction, modification of a building's exterior or modification
of the site. Special use permits are not required for permitted
uses that occupy approved buildings that do not require exterior
building modification or site modification. This provision is
subject to any modifications or additions set forth in this
section. The prescribed procedure may be modified by the City to
allow planning flexibility and to encourage cooperative dialogue
between the applicant and the City.
(3) Permitted Uses The following uses will be permitted in the I-Flex
District providing they satisfy the above stated district purpose
and procedure: (The list of uses will be incorporated into the
Land Use Chart, Section V.E.)
(a) Offices (administrative, executive, corporate, professional,
personal, research and sales).
(b) Any manufacturing, production, fabrication, assembly, pro-
cessing and incidental repair, servicing and testing of
materials, goods or products that is contained wholly within a
building and which meets or maintains all environmental
. standards set by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and
other public agencies having jurisdiction.
. (4) Uses Allowed by Special Use Permit
(a) The above permitted uses, if construction of a new building,
modification of a building's exterior, or modification of the
site is involved.
(b) Municipal and other public agency, administrative and service
facilities and activities.
(c) Licensed day care facilities either in a building containing
other uses or in free-standing buildings containing only day
care facilities.
(d) Satellite antennae over 40 inches in width or height and which
are clearly accessory to a principal use on the premises.
(e) Wholesaling and warehousing if such use is wholly contained
within a building and occupies not more than 50 percent of the
gross floor area of the building in which it is located; or is
existing on (date) as a permitted use or use by special use
permit.
(f) Other similar uses that are in the best interest of the City.
(5) Prohibited Uses Some land uses are not compatible with the stated
purpose of this district and will not be allowed. The following
. uses are therefore prohibited.
(a) Residential uses, except those required for safety and
security reasons in relation to the principal use.
(b) Open sales, rental or storage uses or lots.
(c) Vehicular sales, lease, rental or repair.
(d) Truck terminals, freight terminals and freight forwarding
services.
(e) Bulk storage buildings, yards and terminals, including but not
limited to forest, metal, concrete, agricultural and petroleum
products; chemicals and similar products.
(f) Manufacturing or processing that generates hazardous waste
without a valid hazardous waste generators license from the
Ramsey County Public Health Department or other licensing
agencies having jurisdiction.
(6) District Requirements (The district requirements in Section V,F,
for the 1-2 District, will apply in the I-Flex District.) To
further accomplish the stated purpose of the I-Flex District,
developers are encouraged to plan their sites in the spirit of the
. purpose and intent of the Planned Unit Development provisions in
Section VIII,G,(I). At the time of submittal for the special use
permit and site plan review, the applicant shall identify modifi-
-2-
. cations to the standard zoning requirements otherwise applicable to
the site and the reasons why the modifications would be in the
public interest and would be consistent with the purpose of the
district.
(7) Building Exteriors, Site Features and Site Development
Accomplishing the stated purpose of the I-Flex District requires
particular concern for the design of buildings, site features (such
as landscaping, lighting and signage) and site design. The
arrangement, geometry, massing, materials and colors shall be
responsive to existing buildings, site features and site design on
adjoining sites in the district and shall be consistent with the
site design component of the Lexington Avenue Business Area Plan.
The City Council will make the final determination on the
compatibility and consistency with this provision.
.
.
-3-
. PROPOSED B-3 SERVICE BUSINESS DISTRICT ORDINANCE
(1) Purpose The B-3 Service Business District is established to:
(a) Accommodate an adequate supply of businesses and services that
serve the community and motorists travelling through the
community with a broad range of services and goods.
(b) Provide locations for uses that may be incompatible with
retail centers, thereby keeping the retail centers compact and
convenient.
(c) Keep services in close proximity to arterial streets or
highways in areas that are appropriately designated on the
Comprehensive Plan.
(d) Encourage grouping of compatible and mutually supportive
business uses and services.
(e) Promote business prosperity.
(f) Establish a high standard of development and design that
produces a positive visual image and minimizes the effects of
traffic congestion, noise, odor and glare.
(g) Allow a transitional reuse of existing buildings until market
. conditions warrant redevelopment.
(h) Enhance redevelopment potential by prohibiting uses that would
impede redevelopment.
(i) Ensure acceptable traffic operations on local streets.
(j) Promote flexibility in planning and developing land uses and
site development standards to achieve the purposes of the
district.
(k) Implement that part of the Arden Hills Comprehensive Plan
known as the Lexington Avenue Business Area Plan.
2. Procedure The application and the administrative and review
procedure established in Section VIII,C, special use permits, shall
be followed for all development that involves new building
construction, modification of a building's exterior or modification
of the site. Special use permits are not required for permitted
uses that occupy approved buildings that do not require exterior
building modification or site modification. This provision is
subject to any modifications or additions set forth in this
section. The prescribed procedure may be modified by the City to
allow planning flexibility and to encourage cooperative dialogue
between the applicant and the City.
.
-4-
3. Pennitted Uses The following uses will be permitted in the
. district providing they meet the stated purpose of the district and
the procedure as defined above: (The list of uses below will be
incorporated into the Land Use Chart, Section V,E.)
(a) Business services (printing, secretarial and clerical
services, etc.)
(b) Clinics (medical, veterinary)
(c) Commercial recreation
(d) Day care facilities
(e) Dry cleaning and laundry collection stations and self-service
(f) Financial institutions and services
(g) Hotels, motels
(h) Mortuaries, funeral homes
(i) Offices (personal, professional, administrative, executive,
medical, research)
(j) Personal services and repair services (barbers, beauty shops,
. travel agencies, shoe repairs, etc.)
(k) Restaurants
(1) Retail sales
(m) Special education schools
(n) Sports and fitness clubs
(0) Studios (artist, music, photo, etc.)
(4) Uses Allowed by Special Use Pennit
(a) All of the above permitted uses, if construction of a new
building, modification of a building's exterior or modifi-
cation of the site is involved.
(b) Automobile and motorized vehicle service, including minor
repair and service, parts, rental/lease (not more than eight
rental/lease vehicles on site at one time), wash, service
stations (subject to further requirements in Section
VI ,C, (2)).
(c) Drive-in businesses
. (d) Equipment rental
-5-
. (e) Insurance claim centers
(f) Satellite antennae over 40 inches in width or height and which
are clearly accessory to a principal use on the premises.
(g) Restaurants, fast food
(h) Theatres (indoor)
(5) Special Regulations for Drive-In Businesses and Fast Food
Restaurants in the Lexington Avenue B-3 District Section VI,C, of
the zoning ordinance, specifies additional requirements for
drive-in businesses, fast food restaurants and automobile service
stations. This paragraph (5) is a provision whereby the proximity
requirement of 1,320 feet between drive-in businesses or fast food
restaurants may be waived if certain conditions are satisfied.
Drive-in businesses or fast food restaurants may be allowed without
complying with the 1,320-foot separation if the following condi-
tions are met:
(a) The operation consists of one or more drive-in businesses or
fast food restaurants and is an integral part of a building
containing one or more other allowed uses, or the operation is
part of an architecturally unified "food court" or "drive-in
service court" complex containing two or more restaurants,
fast food restaurants or drive-in businesses.
. (b) Shared access drives and shared parking are utilized by all
such restaurants, fast food restaurants or drive-in businesses
in said building or complex.
(c) Only one "food court" or "drive-in business court" or building
containing fast food restaurants or drive-in businesses will
be allowed in addition to one free-standing fast food
restaurant.
(d) The architecture and the site, grading, circulation, land-
scaping, screening and signage plans shall unify the
appearance and function of the complex or building.
(e) A "fast food court" or "drive-in business court" may consist
of one or more buildings on one or more parcels if the intent
of providing a unified appearance and function is not com-
promi sed.
(6) District Requirements (The district requirements in Section V,F,
for the B-2 District will apply in the B-3 Service Business
District) To further accomplish the stated purpose of the B-3
District, developers are encouraged to plan their sites in the
spirit of the purpose and intent of the Planned Unit Development
provisions in Section VIII,G,(1). At the time of submittal for the
. special use permit and site plan review, the applicant shall
-6-
. identify modifications to the standard zoning requirements other-
wise applicable to the site and the reasons why the modifications
would be in the public interest and would be consistent with the
purpose of the district.
(7) Building Exteriors, Site Features and Site Development
Accomplishing the stated purpose of the B-3 Service Business
District requires particular concern for the design of buildings,
site features (such as landscaping, lighting and signage) and site
design. The arrangement, geometry, massing, materials and colors
shall be responsive to existing buildings, site features and site
design on adjoining sites in the district and shall be consistent
with the site design component of the Lexington Avenue Business
Area Plan. The City Council will make the final determination on
the compatibility and consistency with this provision.
.
.
-7-
. B-4 RETAIL CENTER DISTRICT
(1) Purpose The B-4 Retail Center District is established to:
(a) Meet the retail shopping needs of the surrounding community by
providing a district that will accommodate a wide range of
retail goods and services.
(b) Promote business prosperity by creating an attractive and
functional retail center.
(c) Provide an integrated retail trade center that groups
compatible retail uses in one or more multiple-occupancy
buildings. Free-standing, single-occupancy buildings will be
allowed if planned and constructed as part of a united
development that contains a retail center or is developed
after such a retail center is developed.
(d) Produce a positive visual image by establishing a high
standard of design and development.
(e) Allow transitional uses that will allow an orderly phasing out
of existing uses and development that are not appropriate in a
contemporary retail center and a phasing in of uses and
development as warranted by market conditions.
. (f) Encourage grouping of uses that are mutually supportive and
have similar requirements for vehicular and pedestrian
accessibility and exposure.
(g) Alleviate potential traffic congestion on local streets by the
design of the circulation pattern and arrangement of uses.
"(h) Implement that part of the Arden Hills Comprehensive Plan
known as the Lexington Avenue Business Area Plan.
(2) Procedure The application and the administrative and review
procedure established in Section VIII,C, Special Use Permits, shall
be followed for all development that involves new building
construction, modification of a building exterior, or modification
of the site. A special use permit is not required for permitted
uses that occupy approved buildings that do not require exterior
building modification or modification of the site. This provision
is subject to any modifications or additions set forth in this
Section. The prescribed procedure may be modified by the City to
allow planning flexibility and to encourage cooperative dialogue
between the applicant and the City.
(3) Permitted Uses Due to the replacement, reuse or redevelopment
nature of potential development in this district, the list of 1-2
permitted uses as of [date] that are not permitted in the 8-4
. District will be allowed in buildings existing on (date) as
permitted uses until redevelopment or replacement of the building
or buildings housing such uses occurs. Such uses will not be
-8-
. allowed in buildings constructed after (date). The following uses
will be permitted either as replacement uses in buildings existing
as of (date) or as uses in replaced or redeveloped buildings.
(List will be incorporated into the Land Use Chart, Section V,E.)
(a) Business services (printing, secretarial and clerical
servi ces, etc.)
(b) Commercial recreation
(c) Day care facilities
(d) Financial institutions and services
(e) Offices (personal, professional, administrative, executive,
medical, research)
(f) Personal services and repair shops (barbers, beauty shops,
trave 1 agenci es, shoe repa i rs, etc.)
(g) Restaurants
(h) Retail sales
(i) Sports and fitness clubs
. (j) Studios (artist, music, photo, etc.)
(4) Uses by Special Use Permit Due to the replacement, reuse or
redevelopment nature of potential development in this district, the
existing I-2 uses allowed by special use permit as of (date) will
be allowed to continue as special uses until redevelopment or
replacement of the building or buildings housing such uses occurs.
No new I-2 uses by special use permit will be allowed unless those
uses are permitted or allowed by special use permit in the B-4
District. The following list of uses will be allowed by special
use permit either as replacement uses in buildings existing as of
(date) or as uses in replaced, redeveloped or new buildings. (List
will be incorporated in the Land Use Chart, Section V,E.)
(a) All of the above permitted uses, if construction of a new
building, modification of a building's exterior or
modification of the site is involved.
(b) Drive-in businesses
(c) Restaurants, fast food
(d) Theatres, indoor
(e) Satellite dishes over 40 inches in width or height
.
-9-
. (5) Special Regulations for Drive-In Businesses and Fast Food Restau-
rants in the B-4 District Section VI,C, of the zoning ordinance,
specifies additional requirements for drive-in businesses, fast
food restaurants and automobile service stations. This paragraph
(5) is a provision whereby the proximity requirement of 1,320 feet
between drive~in businesses or fast food restaurants may be waived
if certain conditions are satisfied. Drive-in businesses or fast
food restaurants may be allowed without complying with the 1,320-
foot separation if the following conditions are met:
(a) The drive-in business or fast food restaurant operation is an
integral part of a building containing one or more allowed
uses and the drive-in business or fast food restaurant is
clearly secondary to other principle uses in the building.
(b) The architectural treatment, circulation plan and signage
system of such drive-in business or fast food operations are
designed to be visually and functionally an integral part of
the building and site in which they are located.
(6) District Requirements The requirements below are established for
development of individual "lots" and for the overall development of
"planned projects." "Lots" are individual parcels on which may be
placed a single building (either single-occupancy or multiple-
occupancy). "Planned projects" are sites on which:
. (a) A single- or multiple-occupancy retail center;
(b) Two or more free-standing, single- or multiple-occupancy
buildings; or
(c) A combination of (a) and (b)
may be placed. A "retail center" is a single building housing
either several retail outlets or a single retail outlet with
several departments. Any of the permitted uses or uses by special
use permit are allowed. In a "planned project" individual lots may
be created for separate buildings or parts of buildings but
separate buildings are not required to be located on separate lots.
To allow maximum development creativity and flexibility,
regulations such as lot area, side and rear yard building and
parking setbacks, F.A.R., number of parking spaces, percent of
landscape area, etc., may be modified for individual parcels and
interior lot lines within a project. However, the regulations for
these same items must be met for the total project area and
exterior project lot lines.
(a) Minimum lot area requirements:
(a1) Multiple-occupancy retail center: 5 acres
(a2) Free-standing, single- or multiple-occupancy building:
. 2 acres
-10-
. (b) Maximum bulk requirements:
(bl) Height: 35 feet
(b2) Floor area ratio (F.A.R.): .30
(b3) Lot coverage by structure: 25%
(c) Minimum landscaped area: 25%
(d) Minimum building setbacks:
(dl) Front yard and exterior project lines: 50 feet
(d2) Side yard: 20 feet
(d3) Rear yard: 20 feet.
(7) Building Exteriors, Site Features and Site Development
Accomplishi"ng the stated purpose of the B-4 District requires
particular concern for the design of" buildirigs, site features (such
as landscaping, lighting and signage) and site design. The
arrangement, geometry, massing, materials and colors shall be
responsive to the purpose of the R-4 District and the objective of
the Lexington Avenue Area Plan and shall be consistent with the
site design component of the Lexington Avenue Business Area Plan.
The City Co~ncil will make the final determination on the
compatibility and consistency with this provision.
(a) Landscaping (GB District regulations Section 5,(H) ,(6) ,(e),
. shall apply)
(b) Parking (GB District regulations Section 5,(H),(6),(g), shall
apply)
(c) Signs (GB District regulations Section 5,(H),(6),(i), shall
apply)
(d) Lighting (GB District regulations Section 5,(H),(6),(j), shall
apply)
(e) Pedestrian Circulation: All development within the 8-4
District shall install pedestrian improvements in accordance
with the Lexington Avenue Area Plan and with more specific
City requirements that may become apparent in the plan review
process.
(f) Drainage/Water Management Plan: A plan must be submitted with
each project or lot development in the 8-4 District. The plan
must be approved by the Rice Creek Watershed District, other
agencies as required, and by the City Engineer. On-site
ponding is encouraged as a visual and functional amenity. Two
or more lots or projects may coordinate their plans for their
mutual benefit.
.
-11-
I ~
.
" 0~
"
" ~
" r:? -'Ow..
"
....... ............ " 0
10 R " '.
" ~,Cl0 ~ '\
"
"
"
:' ~~ Qi
.,
" ~0 ;
" .
:. : ~ ,
...h....... ................................ .......u...~ ...R&:Q.Ji.C.:lI:.Q,Q.,A,Q... .............. ........... ..........
-~
~\
','11'
...(
...
. :;; ~..
,.
-<
'" cCJ
~ .
~
~
"
~. ~
-- 0~
~ (J
0
.
"l
z
w
>
-<
w
~ ,
,
:1! ,
I
. 0 100 200 'DO .00 000
W&\9\!t!l'fJ PRIMARY REDEVELOPMENT AREA i"'.- : . i I
* :U:::,AU! IH 'EET
VESll'OCKET PAR< LAND USE PLAN ~
'"""""'
"""'"
Lex~ue Business Area """""""
Arrlpn Hill" llli ~._-
G STUDY -...- ---
. """-
I
. A~I
~'. ~'~':::~~;}~:::i'(~~~;:=r'(J"/~~ :NORTl-iWOOOS
,..~ ~j:i1ttl~ii~i~1~i~.~~i:~~!h~ I
{..", ,":::,:j:~'~~'*",::,(,)""" -}~~~'. {' 11
0 u=5"~f,i l? illlillllli')
ill ..rn'",~ cD Gl
nfmnmHm@~
, D
, D'
I
I
(
" ,
\
I
I
,
I
........_.....,:
. ;; c==J ;'11111;'I;;lrl' G===J
,. '111!,~!!!!!!!I!!!!!~;1 - D
-<
3= CJ j l!II!!!I;~!~IIII ::'C;;} ;;;;;;;;;~;ll
J:
<:J
I
w
>- .llll!iI!!!!~!!!!!!!![il ;~!! !IIIIU"
-<
>- GREY FOX ROAD
'"
I
,
I ~
-- I
~ I
--- I
I
- I
--
w f)
:J
z Ii
w
> " C~YsLJ
,.
-< U
6:
-'
:::;
-<
J: [g
0 I
0
. Parcel Nl.I1lbers Correspond With Map on Page 9 0 100 200 .00 .00 .00
r""",~ , I
POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT .5C"I.E.IN FEET
OR REDEVELOPMENT PARCELS ~ _hnMn
bergly
Lexington Avenue Business Area associalPo5
Arrlpn Hill" aA..tlNlNG STIlDY 111'00 -"--
. --- ---.
.
.
.
w
=>
z
w
>
'"
;:;
~
'"
'"
"
o 100 200 ""00 e~o
. ~~!" L r-',...,- : ,
f;t;:;. 1-2 GENERAL INDUSTRIA , """.,,'"'
0/ B-2 GENERAL BUSINESS NG ~ """""'. n
// EXISTING ZONI t/~ =""
Lexington AvenUG Bsruo\,Area 111. _=-'--::.:,;,;
Arrlpn Hill", ~
I ~
.
. ;;
>- .
<
~
~
ill
>-
<
>-
'"
~
::c
~
,
w ~
:>
z I,
w !:
>
< u
;;
~
"
<
J: ,
,
,
,
I
. 0 100 200 <00 ,"0 ,"0
1"'- : , I
SCALE,INFEET
POTENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS ~ wehrm.,n
Lexington Avenue Business Area bcrgly
associates
!DY Ill'''' ~--
. --- --=:..-=-.::
. - ~ I -
. ~ c;----1 [? "----,
. l) ~Q ~
. REO FOX ROAD REO FOX ROAD
a a
;'
"
---OJ 11
I,
1,
),
'-.... t:
""-1:1
~
\ .'
,.,
,I, "
"W J C1
J '1'
t: D D
~I -
l ji J
, "
--l t:
"
ol,D 1: AD
mn concept A I ~n concept B
-[? Uc8Q [? Uc8c;;
: RED FOX ROAD R::O FOX ROAD
a a
n-
---
! . . G===J J G===J
D D
] ]
AD AD
mn I concept cl -'n concept D I
. ;f.!n11IJ@~ RETAIL CENTER
evn) RETAIL SITES
8-4 DEVELOPMENT CONCEPTS~. wehrman
t/~ bergly
. Lexington Avenue Business Area 1I1J.~~'--
Arrlf:m Hill!': ~G STUDY .. __". -==-:,:;:
- I ~ --
I
, I
I
I
I
. I
I
. I
I
I Q
I
I
I
I
I RED FOX ROAD
I
--
I
0 I
I
1 IT
I
I
I
tl
ti -
ri -------- --------
+'
" 1:
1:
~I
\-+1
J \ 11
~tl C
1t:
t: D
il
]
jl
t:
! :
. I I I I I! concept E I
/1 REf AIL CENTER
8-4 DEVELOPMENT CONCEPTS ~ wehrman
Lexington Avenue Business Area bergly
associates
ArrlF'n HiII~ ~G SruDY Illinc ~._-
. --- -.:::..-:.::
COUNCIL HINUTES DATE PAGE
SUBJECT:
. DISCUSSION:
-
~ --- r~/ td;{ Zf6~ ~. (!.Hi; -
!/ -
-
. --
-
--
~
Hoved: (}jJ\.YOR SATHER) COUNCILMBR: (HANSEN) (MALONE) (HAHOHALD)
Secoi1deq: (ljAYOR SATHER) COUNCILMBR: (HANSEN) (HALONE) "" (MAllm,ALD)
THAT COUNCIL: ....
------.---
VOTE: .A.YES: -
Hansen MaJ.one S'ather Hansen Halone Sathel:
. Gro,..,e Nahm.;ald Grm.;€. l1aho....lald
ABSTAIN: TOTAL: ( - - )
..,----- ---_._.~---- --..-..--------.-------- ....-._-- -------- ------------- '--,'-'-
Hansen HalO'11C Sather GrO\,Je rl.::tho\.!ald Ayes Nays Abs.
ALSO PRESENT: Clk/Adnlinistrator _________p-.ttorney_____Trca5uTer______.. Eng LTIC:.C'r___ ___
Parks Director Pub. Hks. Supervj.sor Planner Dep. Clk
-- -
---- ---- - ----- -"
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
. MEMORANDUM
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
DATE: August 10, 1990
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: &~ Berger, city Administrator
Gary R.
SUBJECT: Albjerg Driveway Restoration
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Attached is a letter from city Attorney Filla regarding the
restoration of Dr. Albjerg's driveway at 1680 Oak Avenue.
Attorney Filla is recommending that the city reimburse Dr.
Albjerg in the amount of $2,065.
City Attorney Filla will be present to discuss this matter with
Council on August 13.
ACTION REQUIRED:
Council should review the attached and be prepared to make a
. recommendation regarding payment on August 13.
GRB:madlr
attachment
.
PETERSON, FRANKE & RIACH tREALPROPERTYLA W SPECLUlST
W AHREN E. PETERSON PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
RQNAIl) J. RIACH "'ALSO ADMITTED IN WISCONSIN .
JEROME P. FIllA 300 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING ."'ALSO ADMJTrED IN TE"1\"ESSEE
THURL M. QUIGLEY 50 EAST FIFTII STREET -
DANIEL WIlT FRAM ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 ROSE\1llE OFFICE
GLENN A. BERGMAN 200 ROSEDALE TOWERS
JOHN MICHAEL MIllER - 1700 WEST HIGHWAY 36
CASS S. WEll'" (612) 291-8955 ROSEVIllE, MINNESOTA 55113
TIMOTHY J. HASSETIt FAX NO. (612) 228-1753 (612) 6~64oo
MICHAEL T. OBERLE FAX NO. (612) 636-7334
BRIAN B. ELKINGTON*'"
CLYDE C. AHLQUIST Of COUNSEl
August 8, 1990 JEROME E. FRANKE
MELVJN J SILVER
Mr. Gary Berger
City Administrator
City of Arden Hills
1450 West Highway 96
Arden Hills, MN 55112
RE: City of Arden Hills
Improvement Project 89-2
Albjerg Driveway Restoration
Our File No.: 10470/890002
Gary:
After our meeting on July 24, 1990, with Dr. Albjerg and
his attorney, I again reviewed the Arden Hills file regarding
the cost of driveway restoration. The eity's contractor did .
not do the restoration work. The restoration work was done by
a contractor hired by Dr. Albjerg but wlth the knowledge and
consent of the City.
Dr. Albjerg has requested that he be reimbursed in the
amount of $2,065.00 for that portion of his driveway
restoration which was necessitated by the City's improvement
project. Considering the work which was done, the request
seems reasonable and I would recommend that the City reimburse
Dr. Albjerg in the amount of $2,065.00.
It is Dr. Albjerg's position that he did not agree to do
all of the restoration wcrk in lieu of special assessment
levies and that his property is not specially benefited by the
construction of this improvement. I presume that he will be
present at the assessment hearing in connection with this
project to enter whatever objections he might have to the
proposed assessment on his site.
Please present this to the City Council for its review.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Very truly yours,
",~,'.C""_'_~,
( ,,-$'.-:/ .
.e;~A
~. .~' 7---1
Jerom<2'P. Filla
JPF:kgj v
COUNCIL HINUTES ~ &~ ~~~,.-
SUBJECT:
. DISCUSSION.
-"
-
. -
,--
--
h~'-----__
~
l-ioved: (lMYOR SATHER) COUNCILHBR: (HANSEN) (HALONE) C ;;~\VA~
Seconded: (I1AYOR SATHER) COUNCILHBR: (HANSEN) EQ1AI:oNE J--S (HAHOII'ALD)
THAT COUNCIL:
&l/~
____._._~ d. -----"-- --.. ._---.-,,-- --- ()
VOTE: AYES: NAYS:
Hansen Halone S-ather Hansen Halonc Sather
. Grmv8 Hahmvald GrmoJe HahO\Jald
ABSTAIN: TOTAL: ( )
-.-------
Hansen Malone Sather Grof->le }[ahuwald Ayes Nays ll,.bs.
ALSO PRESENT: elk/Administrator ________At LOl"tLey___________.. Treasurer ____ Englneer__
Parks Director Pub" l,vks _ St.per\-l SOT Planner Dep" elk
~~-~- ~_.-
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
MEMORANDUM
. -----------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
DATE: July 31, 1990
TO: Mayor and City Council f}dflav
"" ,
FROM: Gary R. Berger, city Administrator " -
SUBJECT: Appointments to Economic Development e
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The following individuals have volunteered to serve on the newly
created Economic Development Committee to study the Lexington
Avenue corridor:
Charles McCann 1839 Venus Avenue 633-5662 (h)
641-0208 (w)
Greg smith 4109 Valentine Crest Rd. 633-7601 (h)
Dan Borgeson 1182 Benton Way 484-3461 (h)
375-4611 (w)
. Dennis Probst 3395 Lake Johanna 633-8225 (h)
370-0700 (w)
David Carlson 1516 Edgewater Ave. 636-7414 (h)
788-1669 (w)
Peter Martin 994 - 8th Ave. NW 639-8737 (h)
New Brighton 452-7789 (w)
Janet Grottodden 1759 Chatham Ave. 636-3605 (h)
As Council will note, two members, Probst and Carlson, are
current members of the Planning commission. Martin recently
resigned from the Commission and now lives in New Brighton. The
other volunteers are all City residents who have volunteered to
serve on this Committee.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the above seven individuals be appointed to
the Economic Development Committee. Council will need to
determine a date and time for this group to meet and also appoint
a Council liaison and give direction.
.
__u ___._______
Page Two
.
ACTION REQUIRED:
If Council concurs with the staff recommendation, they should
pass a motion appointing the above individuals to the Economic
Development Committee to study the Lexington Avenue corridor, set
a date and time for meetings and select a Council liaison to work
with this Committee.
It should be noted that Mr. McCann indicated that Thursday
evenings would be a bad night for him to attend meetings. He
also stated that he was Chairman of the Public Safety/Works
Committee many years ago, that he is a developer in the Midway
area, but that he is not looking to develop in this area.
GRB:madlr
NOTE TO COUNCIL: ...
It should be noted that resumes were not requested from the
volunteers. Council may wish to request resumes from the
volunteers who do not serve on the Planning Cormnission. before
they make appointments to this Cormnittee.
.
COUNCIL HINUTES~7/. DATE PAGE
SUBJECT; ~ ~ ~
e D USSION:;. '2.
- ( .. ..
,r ..... ,_
<.' ",. ~-
---
,
;
Moved; (lMYOR SATHER) COUNCILMBR; (HANSEN) (HALONE) (GROWE) (HAHOi,ALD)
Seconded: (~jAYOR SATHER) COUNCILHBR: (HANSEN) (HALONE) (GROi,E) (HAHO\,ALD)
THAT COUNCIL;
.._~~---
---. -.
VOTE; AYES; Nfl Y S ;
Hansen Malone S-ather Hanse.n Nalone. Sather
. Growe Mahm'lald . GroHe Maho~'l<-11d
ABSTAIN: _""_"~~____" _._ "eOTAL; (_---=-__""~_"""._.__)
Hanse.n MaIone Sather Gro\.Je Haho1;-..'ald Ayes Nays Abs.
ALSO PRESENT: elk/ Adrninis tra tor _____J~t torney___.._Treasurer____ Engineer _____
Parks Director Pub. I\'ks. Sl~'Jervisor Planner Dep. Clk_~
. .
. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
MEMORANDUM
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
DATE: August 9, 1990
TO: Mayor and city Council ~. j1
.::.'j
FROM: Gary R. Berger, city Administrator
SUBJECT: Draft citizen Survey
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Enclosed for your review and comment is a copy of the Draft
citizen Survey prepared by Decision Resources.
Ms. Diane Traxler from Decision Resources will be present at the
August 13 Council meeting to answer Council questions.
ACTION REQUIRED:
Council shOUld review this material and be prepared to offer any
. suggestions or comments regarding the questions contained in the
survey.
GRB:madlr
attachment
.
-----------
, ;>
,
DECISION RESOURCES, LTD. ARDEN HILLS RESIDENTIAL
. 3128 Dean Court QUESTIONNAIRE
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55414 Version 1.1
Hello, I'm of Decision Resources, Ltd. , a nationwide
polling firm located in Minneapolis. We've been retained by the
city of Arden Hills to speak with a random sample of residents
about issues facing the city. The survey is being taken because
your city representatives and staff are interested in your
opinions and suggestions. I want to assure you that all
individual responses will be held strictly confidential; only
summaries of the entire sample will be reported. (DO NOT PAUSE)
1. Approximately how many years LESS THAN ONE YEAR......1
have you lived in Arden Hills? ONE OR TWO YEARS........2
THREE TO FIVE YEARS.....3
SIX TO TEN YEARS... .....4
ELEVEN - TWENTY YEARS...5
OVER TWENTY YEARS.......6
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......7
2 . In what city and/or state was your immediately prior
residence located?
. 3. As things now stand, how long LESS THAN ONE YEAR......1
in th'~ fut.ure do YO"l expect to ONE TO TWO YEARS.. ......2
live in Arden Hills? THREE TO FIVE YEARS.....3
SIX TO TEN YEARS... .....4
OVER TEN YEARS..........5
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. .....6
4. How would you rate the quality of EXCELLENT.. t'~ .... t... I \1
life in Arden Hills -- excellent, GOOD. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2
good, only fair, or poor? ONLY FAIR..... ..........3
POOR. . . t . . . , . ~ .. . . ~ . . . . ~ . 4
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED... ...5
5. Thinking back to when you moved to Arden Hills, what factors
were most important to you in selecting the city?
----
6 . What do you like MOST about living in Arden Hills?
. .,-- ~----~
1
,
,
7. What do you like LEAST about it?
.
8. How would you rate the general EXCELLENT......... ......1
sense of oommunity among Arden GOOD............. ... ....2
Hills residents -- exoellent, ONLY FAIR........... ....3
good, only fair, or poor? POOR....................4
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.. ....5
9. Is there a geographical area in the city which you consider
to be the focal point of Arden Hills? (IF "YES," ASK:)
Where is it?
changing topics....
10. Would you favor or oppose an in- FAVOR... ............. ...1
orease in city property taxes if OPPOSE..... .......... ...2
it were needed to maintain city DON'T KNOW/REFUSED... ...3
services at their current level?
11. Do you consider property taxes in COMPARATIVELY LOW.... ...1
Arden Hills to be comparatively ABOUT AVERAGE.. ....... ..2 .
low, about average, relatively RELATIVELY HIGH. ..... ...3
high, or excessively high? EXCESSIVELY HIGH...... ..4
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......5
As you may xnow, property taxes are divided between the city of
Arden Hills, Ramsey County, and the Mounds View Public Sohool
District.
12. For each dollar of property taxes UNDER TEN PERCENT.......1
you pay, about what percentage do 10% TO 20%.. ..... .......2
you think goes to city govern- 21% TO 30%.. ..... ... ....3
ment? (READ CHOICES, IF NEEDED) 31% TO 40%....... .......4
41% TO 50%..............5
51% TO 60%..... I . t . t t . ~ .6
OVER SIXTY PERCENT......7
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......8
As you may know, the city share of the property tax in your
school district is about percent.
13. During the past few years, has INCREASED..., ..... ......1
the cit~ tax rate increased, DECREASED..... .... ......2
deoreased, or remained about the ABOUT THE SAME.... ... ...3
same? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.. . . . .4 .
For your information, the C5ty's tax rate has
2
14. When you consider the property EXCELLENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
. taxes you pay and the quality GOOD. . . . , ,.. .. t . . . . .. .. .. . , . I .. 2
of city services you reoeive, ONLY :FAIR............... 3
would you rate the general value POOR. . .. .. .. .. .. t . .. . .. .. .. .. .. . , t t 4
of city services as excellent, DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.... ..5
good, only fair, or poor?
I would like to read you a list of a few city services. For each
one, please tell me whether you would rate the quality of the
service as excellent, good, only fair, or poor?
EXC GOOD FAIR POOR D.R.
15. Police protection? 1 2 3 4 5
16. Fire protection? 1 2 3 4 5
17. City street repair and
maintenance? 1 2 3 4 5
18. Sewers and water? 1 2 3 4 5
19. Snow plowing? 1 2 3 4 5
20. Animal control? 1 2 3 4 5
. 21. street sweeping? 1 2 3 4 5
22. Park maintenance? 1 2 3 4 5
23. Street lighting? 1 2 3 4 5
24. Code enforcement? 1 2 3 4 5
IF "ONLY FAIR" OR "POOR" IN QUESTIONS #15-24, ASK FOR EACH:
25. Why did you rate as (only fair/poor)?
26. other than voting, do you feel YES. ... . . ... .. ..... .. . . .1
that if you wanted to, you could NO.......... ..... .. . ... .2
have a say about the way the city DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.. ....3
of Arden Hills runs things?
27. How much do you feel you know GREAT DEAL............. .1.
about the work of the Mayor and FAIR AM:OUNT t . .. .. . . .. + t . .. . , 2
City eounoil -- a great deal, a VERY LITTLE............ . 3
. fair amount, or very little? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......4
3
---------- ---------
~~
.- ',.
.
'.
28. From what you know, do you ap... STRONGLY APPROVE........l
prove or disapprove of the job SOMEWHAT APPROVE........2 .
the Mayor and city Council are SOMEWHAT DISAPPROVE.....3
doing? (WAIT FOR RESPONSE) STRONGLY DISAPPROVE.....4
And do you feel strongly tbat DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......5
way?
IF OPINION STATED IN QUESTION #28, ASK:
29. Why do you feel that way?
30. How muoh first-hand oontact have QUITE A LOT.. ...........1
you had with the Arden Hills City SOME. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Staff -- quite a lot, some, very VERY L1TTLE........... + .. . .3
little, or none at all? NONE AT ALL..... ... .....4
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.. ....5
31. From what you have seen or heard, EXCELLENT........ .... ....1
how would you rate the job per- GOOD. . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . ....2
formanoe of the Arden Hills city ONLY FAIR................ + 3
Staff -- excellent, good, only POOR... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4
fair, or poor? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.. ....5
IF RATING GIVEN IN QUESTION #31, ASK:
32. Why did you rate oity staff as ? .
Let's talk about public safety in Arden Hills....
33. During the past year, have you YES. ... .. ... ... . ... ... ..1
been involved in or observed a N-O. .. + + . . . . . .. ". .. + .. +"" 2
situation in which a member of DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.... ,.3
the Ramsey County Sheriff Depart-
ment was present?
IF "YES," ASK:
34. Would you say the way the EXCELLENT.. .... ...... ...1
police handled the situation GOOD. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
was excellent, good, only ONLY FAIR.,..... 4. . . . t . . ... 3
fair, or poor? POOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
DON'T KNOW/REFuSED... ...5
35. Would you say the time PROMPT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
it took the pOlice to re- NOT PROMPT.............. 2
spond was prompt, or not? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED... ...3 .
4
---------------
!!'
,
36. How would you rate the amount of TOO MUCH... .". . . . . . . . . . . . 1
. patrolling the'police department ABOUT RIGHT........ .....2
does in your neighborhood -- NOT ENOUGH............. . 3
would you say they do too much, DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. ... ..4
about right, or not enough?
37. During the past year, have you YES.;. , t..,,,............, i ;.;.;......1
been involved in or observed a NO..............;.. t t;..................2
situation in which a member of DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.. ....3
the Fire Department was present?
IF "YES," ASK:
38. Woutd you say the way the EXCELLENT.. .... ... ......1
firefighters handled the GOOD, ;. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. t ;. t t .. .. .. .. 2
situation was excellent, ONLY FAIR............... 3
good, onty fair, or poor? POOR. . . . . .. . . .. .. .. .. .. .. . . t + .. .. 4
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. .....5
39. Would you say the time PROMPT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . 1
it took the fire department NOT PROMPT....... ...... ,2
to respond was prompt, or DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. .....3
not?
40. bo you have a working SmOKe YES/MORE THAN ONE.......1
. detector installed in your home? YES/ONLY ONE... .... .....2
(IF "YES," ASK:) Do you have NO. .. . . .. . . . , .. . ;. ;. ~ t . II> ;. '" . . .. 3
more than one? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......4
41. Do you have a fire extinguisher YES.. .. .... . .. ..... ... . .1
mounted in your home? NO.......... . .. . . .. .... .., t ... < .2
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......3
Moving on....
42. During the past twelve months, YES. ... .. .. .. ... .. . .. . . .1
have you contacted anyone working NO. . ... .. ... . . . ... . . . . . .2
for the city of Arden Hills, other DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......3
than the police or fire depart-
ments, whether to obtain informa-
tion, to get service, or make a
oomplaint of any kind?
IF "YES," ASK:
43. What. was the nature of your most reoent inquiry; that
is, what information or service did you need?
~__"W_.___.~_."~______..~
.
5
.
44. What department or official did you c0ntact first about .
this inquiry?
45. In general, were you sat is- SATISFIED..... ..........1
fied or dissatisfied with the DISSATISFIED......... ...2
way your inquiry was handled? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.... ..3
IF "DISSATISFIED," ASK:
46. Why were you dissatisfied?
47. Have you visited the Arden Hills YES.. ..... ........ .. ... .1
city Hall during the past two NO. ., ,..... .............. ..... .2
years? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......3
48. From what you have heard or seen, EXCELLENT.. .......... ...1
how would you rate the condition ADEQUATE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
of the building -- excellent, ade- INADEQUATE. .......,.. ...3
quate, inadequate, or poor? POOR.. .. . . .. + .. . .. + . t . .. ;. . . ; . . 4
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.... ..5 .
~9. In general, do you feel that ~he ADEQUATE... .......... ...1
structure is adequate or inade- INADEQUA'l'E. . .. . . .. . . . . ..2
guate for providing service to DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.... ..3
the residents of Arden Hills?
Let's talk about future eoonomic development in Arden Hills....
50. How would you rate the pace of TOO RAPID..... ..........1
economic development in Arden ABOUT RIGHT... ..........2
Hills -- too rapid, about right, TOO SLOW.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3
or too slow? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED... ...4
IF OPINION IS GIVEN, ASK:
51. Why do you feel that way?
52. If the city were to attract more development, what kind
would you most prefer?
.-..--- .
6
{
. 53. Do you support or oppose the city STRONGLY SUPPORT........1
taking an active and aggressive SUPPORT.... .............2
role in attracting targeted devel- OPPOSE..... ....., ,., ....3
opment to Arden Hills? (WAIT FOR STRONGLY OPPOSE.........4
RESPONSE) And, do you feel strong- DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. .....5
ly that way?
54. Do you favor or oppose the city STRONGLY FAVOR. .......,.1
offering financial incentives to FAVOR..,....,.. t...........2
attract various types of devel- OPPOSE. . . I . .. . .. ,. . * . . . to . . . 3
opment to the community? (WAIT STRONGLY OPPOSE..... ....4
FOR RESPONSE) And, do you feel DON'T KNOW/REFUSED",. ..5
strongly that way?
The city could undertake many different initiatives to attraot or
disoourage various types of future development. For each of the
following categories, please tell me if you feel the eity of
Arden Hills should act aggressively to attract that type of
growth, act aggressively to discourage that type of growth, or
take no action one way or the other, If you have no opinion, just
say so.
AGG AGG NO DK/
ATT DIS ACT REF
55. Single family homes for moderate
income families. 1 2 3 4
. 56. Low income family housing. 1 2 3 4
57. Apartment'buildings. 1 2 3 4
58. Townhouses. 1 2 3 4
59. condominiums. 1 2 3 4
60. Senior citizen housing. 1 2 3 4
61- Mobile homes. 1 2 3 4
62. Retail shopping centers. 1 2 3 4
63, Commercial office buildings. 1 2 3 4
64. Light industrial plants. 1 2 3 4
65. Parks and recreational open
spaces. 1 2 3 4
66. Should the TOP priority for devel- TAX BASE..... ..... .... ..1
opment in this city be on increa- JOBS. . ~ + I t i . . . . . . . . + .. . . .2
sing the tax base, providing head- HOUSING........... ... ...3
Of-household jobs, providing hou- RECREATION........,.... .4
sing opportunities for young RETAIL SHOPPING. ... .....5
families and retirees, providing COMBINATION (VOL) . . .. ...6
recreational and leisure time NONE OF ABOVE. ....... ...7
offerings, or attracting more re- DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.. ....8
tail shopping opportunities?
67. What should be the second prior- TAX BASE................1
ity? (RE-READ ABOVE LIST, IF JOBS. , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2
NECESSARY. ) HOUSING. ~ .. . .. t. . . . t . . . . . .3
. RECREATION t . . . . . . . . . . . . .4
RETAIL SHOPPING....,..,.5
COMBINA'I'ION (VOL) .. . .. .. 6
NONE OF ABOVE... ...... ..7
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.., ...8
7
---- -----------
-.---.
With dernilitari~ation because of the easing of tensions with the .
soviet union, the Arsenal property in Arden Hills could become
available for other uses.
"6B. Should the City of Arden Hills PURCHASE. . . . . ~ ~ . t .. -t t t . . ~ 1
attempt to purchase that land to REGULATE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
directly control its use or should DEPENDS (VOL)...........3
it try to regulate its future use DON'T CARE (VOL)....... .4
through zoning decisions without DON'T KNOW/REFUSED... ...5
buying the property?
If the City were to purchase and redevelop that land, substantial
costs might be involved. The city would not only have to pay
fair value for the land, but would have to bear costs to clean up
contaminated soil and remove buried ammunition. The eity might
have to ask residents to permit the issuing of long term bonds to
finance this projeot. Property ownerS would be asked to inorease
their property taxes to cover the principal and interest of the
bonds.
69. Would you favor or oppose a prop- STRONGLY FAVOR........,.l
erty tax increase to purchase and FAVOR~ ~.. ........ ...... . t . . + . .2
redevelOp the Arsenal site? (WAIT OPPOSE. . .. . t . I t t . . ~ . . . ~ . .. 3
FOR RESPONSE) And do you feel STRONGLY OPPOSE.. ..... ..4
strongly that way? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.... ..5
IF "STRONGLY FAVOR" OR "FAVOR," ASK: .
70. How much would you be willing NOTHING..... ........ ....1
to see your property taxes $25.00. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2
increase per year? Let's $50.00. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3
say, would you be willing to $100.. OOA.. ~;. t ~ t.. +.. +. ~...4
see a yearly increase of $125.00. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5
$-~? (CHOOSE RANDOM START- $150.. 00. .. . .. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . .6
ING LEVEL; MOVE UP OR DOWN $175.00. t .. .. t.. . . . . . . . + + . .7
DEPENDING ON ANSWER.) How DON'T KNOW.............. 8
about $_? (REPEAT PROCESS) REFUSED. . . . . . . t . .. . .. t . .. . ;. 9
7l. Should the arsenal property be MULTIPLE USES. .... ... ...1
developed for multiple uses, such PARK ONLy..... . . . . . . . . . .2
as housing, retail, offices, light DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......3
industrial and reoreational, or
should it be maintained only as
a large community park?
72. If the city cannot prooure all of YES... .. ... .... .. ... . .. .1
the Arsenal property, should it NO...... ." . .. .... . .... ... . . .... 2
attempt to purchase parts of it? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.... ..3
There has been some discussion about the need for a new city Hall
and Public Works Building. The present city Hall is about forty .
years old, provides inadequate office space, needs major repairs,
and has been oited for building code violations.
B
73, Do you favor or oppose the cons- STRONGLY FAVOR. .;......,1
. truction of a new city Hall? FAVOR. .. t . I + . . .. . . , + + . . . . . 2
(WAIT FOR RESPONSE) And, do you OPPOSE. . . . . . t t + . . . . .. ~ . + .. 3
feel strongly that way? STRONGLY OPPOSE.....,...4
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......5
74. Should a new City Hall just con- YES.. .. t + ...o..... + t .....1
tain city offices or should it be NO.., t. t .. II...... ,t. t..... 2
a multi-use facility in which DON'T KNOW/REFUSED....,,3
space can be rented to other
government". bodies, such as the
School Distriot?
75. Should a new eity Hall be built CURRENT SITE.. .... ......1
at the current site or in some OTHER SITE. .............2
other part of the community? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......3
IF "OTHER PART OF COMMUlHTi.'," ASK:
76. Where would you like to see a new city Hall built?
Several cities in the Metropolitan Area have built community
centers adjoining their city halls. Would you strongly favor,
somewhat favor, somewhat oppose, or strongly oppose, a communit.y
. center addition which contained..,.
StF SmF SmO StO Dl\i\
77 . Meeting rooms for community
groups? 1 2 3 4 5
78. Athletic facilities, such as
a gymnasium or exercise rooms? 1 2 3 4 5
79. An indoor swimming pool? 1 2 3 4 5
130, Would you be most likely to favor CITY HALL ALONE.........1
a new city Hall if it stood alone, INCLUDE COM CENTER......2
included a community center addi- OPPOSE IT.... ..... ... ~..J
tion, or would you oppose it under DON'T KNOW/REFUSED... ...4
either condition? 1 ',ILJ(j
The building of a new city Hall would require oitizens to approve
a bond referendum. Property owners would be asked to increase
their property taxes to cover the principal and int.erest. of the
bonds. First, let's consider just a City Hall.,..
81- Would you favor or oppose a prop- STRONGLY FAVOR..... ... ..1
. erty tax increase to construct a FAVOR. . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . .2
new city Hall? (WAIT FOR RE- OPPOSE.. .. . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . 3
SPONSE) And do you feel strongly STRONGLY OPPOSE......... 4
that way? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED,.. ...5
9
):F "STRONGLY FAVOR" OR "FAVOR," ASK: .
82. How much would you be willing NOTHING.. ....,.. ........1
to see your property taxes $10.00. .. . ~ . .. I< t . .. . .. .. .. . t t .. 2
increase per year? Let's $20.00. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3
say, would you be willing to $30.. 00. .... . ..... . ...... .. I . i ..4
see a yearly increase of $40.00 I< .. . .. . . .. . .. .. .. .. . . .. . . .5
$_? (CHOOSE RANDOM START- $50.. 00. .. . . . . .. . .. f II . . . . .. .. .. 6
ING LEVEL; MOVE UP OR DOWN $60.00.. . t . .. ; .. . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. 7
DEPENDING ON ANSWER.) How DON'T KNOW.......... . . . . 8
about $ ? (REPEAT PROCESS) REFUSED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9
How about a new city Hall with adjoining Community Center....
83. Would you favor or oppose a prop- STRONGLY FAVOR..........1
erty tax inorease to oonstruct a FAVOR....... 'O. . . .. . "" .. +.. . .. 2
new City Hall and Community Can- OPPOSE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
tar? (WAIT FOR RESPONSE) And, do STRONGLY OPPOSE..... ....4
you feel strongly that way? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. .....5
IF "STRONGLY FAVOR" oR "FAVOR," ASK:
84. How much would you be willing NOTHING... .... ..... .....1
to see your property taxes $15.00. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2
increase per year? Let's $30.00. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3
say, would you be willing to $45.00..... ..... I ...... ,t I t 4 .
see a yearly increase of $60.. 00.. . . . t . .. , I I .. . . .. .. . .. .5
$~7 (CHOOSE RANDOM START- $75.00 I . . . .. ; . t . . . . . . .. .. . . 6
ING LEVEL; MOVE UP OR DOWN $90.00. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7
DEPENDING ON ANSWER.) How DON'T KNOW.............. 8
about $~? (REPEAT PROCESS) REFUSED. . . . . t . . . . . . 1 .. .. . .9
Turning to parks and recreational opportunities. ...
85. In general, do you usually spend OUTDOOR ACTIVITIES.... ..1
your leisure time in outdoor INDOOR ACTIVITIES. ......2
activities, weather permitting, BOTH (VOL.) .... .. . ... .. .3
or indoor activities? NO FREE TIME (VOL.).....4
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......5
86. In general, how well informed are VERY WELL INFORMED.... ..1
you about the Arden Hills park SOMEWHAT INFORMED. .... ..2
system and facilities. Would you NOT TOO WELL lNFORMED...3
say you are very well informed, NOT AT ALL INFORMED... ..4
somewhat informed, not too well DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.... ..5
informed, or not at all informed?
The Arden Hills park system is composed of neighborhood parks and
trails.
87. How often do you visit or use an FREQUENTLY... ..... +0 I ...1 .
Arden Hills park or recreational OCCASIONALLY.. ....... ...2
facility -- frequently, oocasion- AARELY. . . . . . . . . . . + . . . . . .3
,,:Lly, rarely, or never? NEVER. . . I . t . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED., ....5
10
~
88. How would you rate park and rec- EXCELLENT....... ........1
. reational facilities in Arden GOOD. . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . I 2
Hills -- excellent, good, only ONLY FAIR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3
fair, or poor? POOR. . . . . . ~ . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . 4
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......5
IF RATING IS GIVEN, ASK:
89. Why do you feel that way?
90. Do you prefer trails to be paved CEMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
with cement or asphalt? ASPHALT. . . . . . . , . . ~ . . ~ . . . 2
DON'T CARE (VOL)....... .3
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. .....4
91. Should trails in the city serve PEDESTRIANS ONLy.... ....1
pedestrians only or pedestrians PEDESTR + BICYCL........2
and bicyclists? SOME OF BOTH (VOL)...,. .3
DON'T CARE (VOL) ",.... .4
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......5
92. Do you feel that the current mix YES. + + . '" ..... .. . .... ....1
of recreational opportunities NO. . . . . . ~ . . . . + , .. . . I + . I . 12
sufficiently meets the needs of DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......3
members of your household?
. IF "NO, "ASK:
93. what additional recreational opportunities would you
like to see the City of Arden Hills offer residents?
The Arden Hills Park System has been constructed and maintained
through the use of various revenue sources. 'ro date, it has not
been funded with property tax monies.
94. Would you favor or oppose a prop- STRONGLY FAVOR.. ... '., ,.1
erty tax increase to maintain and FAVOR. . . . . . . . . . , . . , . . . . . 2
improve the park system? (WAIT OPPOSE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3
FOR RESPONSE) And do you feel STRONGLY OPPOSE... .... ..4
strongly that way? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED. .., ..5
IF "STRONGLY FAVOR" OR "FAVOR," ASK:
95. How much would you be willing NOTHING.... ........... ..1
to see your property taxes $10.00. . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . ~ 2
increase per year? Let's $20.00. . . . . . , , . . , . . . . . . .3
say, would you be willing to $ 30.00. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4
. see a yearly increase of $40~OO~.............. t..5
$ ? (CHOOSE RANDOM START- $50.00. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , + 6
INC LEVEL; MOVE UP OR DOWN $60.00.......,..........7
DEPENDING ON ANSWER.) How DON'T KNOW....... ..... .,8
about $_ ? (REPEAT PROCESS) REFUSED. , , . , . . . . . . . . . . . ,9
11
----
-"-
.
.
Changing topics....
96. Do you approve or disapprove of STRONGLY APPROVE..... ...1
charitable gambling in Arctan Hills APPROVE......... ........2
establishments? (WAIT FOR RE- DISAPPROVE......... .....3
SPONSEl And do you feel strongly STRONGLY DISAPPROVE.....4
that way? DON'T KNOW/REPDSED.... ..5
The city raises $110,000.00 per year through charitable gambling
activities.
97. Would you support the elimination YES.. ........ +..........1
of charitable gambling in the city NO... ........... ........2
even if property taxes would have DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.... ..3
to be raised or city services cut
to make up the difference?
Arden Hills has currently granted licenses to organiza-
tions to permit charitable gambling.
98. Do you feel that this number of EXPAND. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
licenses should be expanded by CURRENT LEVEL.. .........2
two or three, or kept at its DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......3
current level? .
Some people feel that neighborhood improvements should be paid
for only by the people directly effected in the area. others
feel that neighborhood improvements should be paid for by general
city funds, since property values across the city are indirectly
impacted. For each of the following improvements, please tell me
if you think that only property owners in the area, or the entire
city should pay....
AREA CITY BOTH DKRl:
99. street lighting? 1 2 3 4
100. sidewalks? 1 2 3 4
101. Street reconstruction? 1 2 3 4
As you may know, recyclable materials are picked up at the curb
in Arden Hills. Households are asked to separate recyolables
from the rest of their trash and haulers carry them away.
102. Do you now participate in the YES... .. . . I . I .. ... ... ...1
curbside pick-up program? NO.... .... . . . ... . . ... . ..2
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......3
IF IIYES, II ASK: .
12
----
.
. t
103. How often do you put recy- WEEKLY.. t t t f t t . . .. .. .. .. .. .. . . .1 ,
i
clables out for collection TWICE MONTHLY...........2
-- weekly, twice monthly, ONCE MONTHLy.... . . . . . . . .3
monthly, quarterly, or less? QUARTERLY. .......... ....4
LESS. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. t . ,5
DON'T KNOWjREFUSED......6 \
104. Are you satisfied or dis- \
SATISFIED....... ........1 ,
satisfied with the recycling DISSATISFIED...........,2
program? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......3
IF "DISSATISFIED," ASK:
105. Why do you feel that way? \
IF "NO," ASK:
106. Which of the fOllowing best STATEMENT A. . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
describes your reasons for STATEMENT B...... . . . . . . .2
not participating: STATEMENT C.... ....... ..3
A. I wasn't aware of the STATEMENT D.............4
hew program. STATEMENT E.. . . . . . . .., . .5
. B. I knew about it, put need ALL OF THE ABOVE (VOL) ..6
more info~ation. OTHER REASON... ....... ..7
C. The program is too incon- NONE OF ABOVE (VOL).....8
venient. DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......9
D. I am just not interested.
E. It isn't worth it to take
the time.
107. How do you currently dispose of COMPOST ON PROPERTY... ..1
grass Clippings and yard waste USE DROP-OFF SITE... ....2
-- do you compost on your prop- GARBAGE HAULER... .......3
erty, use a yard waste drop-off OTHER METHOD (VOL.) . ... .4
site, or have your garbage hauler DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.. ....5
collect it?
As you also may know, several refuse haulers serve Arden Hills.
This arrangement has permitted citizens to choose their own
haulers and contract directly with them. It has also created
significant overlap between the hauler routes and increased noise
and congestion on city streets.
108. Of the following three proposals, PROPOSAL A.. .f... .....0.1
which do you most favor: PROPOSAL B.............. 2
A. The present sYstem. PROPOSAL C. .. . . .. . . . .. . . .. . .3
. B. The city assigns current ALL EQUALLY.............4
haulers to eXClusively handle DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.. ....5
specific areas;
C. The City designates one hauler
to serve the entire city;
13
,
.
Changing topics again.... .
109. What is your primary souroe of information about community
events going on in Arden Hills?
110. What is your primary source of information about city
government "and its activities?
111. Do you receive the quarterly RECEIVE/READ... ... ......1
"Town Crier" Newsletter"? (IF RECEIVE/DON'T READ......2
"YES," ASK:) Do you regularly DON f T RECE1VE........... 3
read the newsletter? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......4
IF "RECEIVE AND READ," ASK:
112. Are there any changes in the format or coverage you
would like to see? (IF "YES," ASK:) What are they?
113. Does your household currently YES... .. ... . . . . ... ... ...1 .
subscribe to cable television? NO... t ft... ... .... ... "'.... . .......2
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED... ...3
IF "YES," ASK:
114. Would you say you watch local FREQUENTLy........... ...1
government access Channel 16 OCCASIONALLy.......... ..2
frequently, occasionally, RARELY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
l'arely, or not at all? NOT AT ALL..... .......,.4
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.. ....5
IF "FREQUENTLY" OR "OCCASIONALLY," ASK:
115. How would you rate the EXCELLENT.............. .1
quality of the picture GOOD. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
and sound -- excellent, ONLY FAIR. t " . . . . . .. t . l . t . :3
good, only fair, or POOR. . " .. . . . . t . .. . . . . . . # . + 4
poor? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED..,. ..5
116. Would you say you watch city FREQUENTLY..t". I tt .t....1
Council meeting telecasts OCCASIONALLy....... .....2
telecasts frequently, occa- RARELY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3
&ionally, rarely, or not at NOT AT ALL........... ...4
all? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED... ...5 .
117. Do you subscribe to and read the YES.. . . . . . . . . . . . .. ... . ..1
"New Brighton Bulletin"? NO. ... . . ... . . . .. .. ... . ..2
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......3
Now, just a few more questions for demographic purposes....
14
)
.
.
. could you tell me how many people in each of the following age
groups live in your household. Let's start oldest to
youngest, and be sure to include yourself....
118. Persons over 65?
119. Adults over 18?
120. School-aged children?
121. presohoolers?
122. Do you own or rent your present OWN.................... .1
residenoe? RENT, .. . . . . t ;. , ;. ;. . ;. ;. ;. .. . ;. , . 2
REFUSED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
123. Which of the following categories 18 - 24.................1
contains your age, please? 25 - 34.................2
35 - 44...~....tt""..,3
45 - 54.....;...;..............;. 4
55 - 64.................5
65 AND OVER....,t. .tl t..6
REFUSED. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7
. 124. which of the following best SINGLE FAMILY HOME......1
describes your present residence? DUPLEX/DOUBLE BUNGALOW..2
(READ CHOICES #1-#6.) 3-PLEX OR 4-PLEX... .....3
APARTMENT BUILDING OF
5-9 UNITS..........4
APARTMENT BUnDING OF
10 OR MORE UNITS...S
MOBILE HOME... ..... .....6
OTHER. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
DON'T KNOW/REFuSED. .....8
125. What is the last grade of LESS THAN HIGH SCHOOL...1
education you completed? HIGH SeHOOL GRADUATE....2
VO-TECH SCHOOL..... .....3
SOME COLLEGE.. ...... ....4
COLLEGE GRADUATE.... ....5
POST-GRADUATE.......... .6
REFUSED. .. . ;." . . ., t ... . . .;. .7
126. What is your occupation and, if applioable, the occupation
of your spouse?
M: F:
127. Do you and/or your spOuse, if RESPONDENT ONLy.... .....1
. applicable, work in Arden Hills? SPOUSE ONLY.. ......., ...2
BOTH. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
NEITHER.... ~.......... ..4
DON'T KNOW/REFUSED.., ...5
15
.
.
128. Which of the following categories BELOW $12,000..........01 .
includes your 1989 total pre-tax $12,501-$25,000... .....02
household income. Please stop me $25,001-$37,500. ...... .03
when I read the right one. $37,501-$50,000.. ......04
$50,001-$62,500...... ..05
$62,501-$75,000. ...... .06
$75,001-$87,500.. ..... .07
$87,501-$100,000.. ... ..08
OVER $100,000......... .09
DON' 'r KNOW....... . . . . . . 10
REFUSED. ..... ..... ... . .11
129. Gender (DO NOT ASK) MALE" " .. " . . " . t . . . . . " " " " " " 1
FEMALE" . , ~ . " .. " .. " " .. .. .. . , t I 2
Thanks very much for your time. Good-bye.
130. Zone (CODED)
.
.
16
""
COUNCIL HINUTES
SUBJECT:
. DISCUSSION:
~) ~ --~ <)/ -!~
lru~ ----
~,~~~~~M ~ ~Cfir-
'" ~ At$~
-
~ "
oved: {lMYOR SATHER) COUNCILMBR: (HANSEN) (MALONE) (GRO\m) (MAHOWALD)
econcled: (MAYOR SATHER) COUNCILHBR: (HANSEN) (HAL(JN!~:) (GRO\,JE) (HAHo\.lALD)
HAT COUNCIL:
--------~------ ------- ,.
-------------------________________n_____.._ --~._-_.__._------,----- .--.--.---.----
--~-~--------_._---
VOTE: AYES: NAYS:
----.----,. --------- -..-- 1'1alone Sathe:~
Hansen Malone S'atbel~ Hansen
C;l:owe Maho'~f!J_d (;1.'0"'.112 r1.:1 how21d
.BSTA1N: TOTAL: ( - )
--..---------- ._--~-_._---_.._----~-_.._.._--_.__._--
11ansen Malone Sather Growe Mahowald Ayes Nays Abs.
ALSO PRESENT: elk/Administrator j..~t torne> Treasurer Engineer
--..
Parks Director Pub. ~.Jks . Supervj.sor Planner Dep. Clk
_.__.'''''''._A......'
~ 0/-1
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
. MEMOR.^u"lDUM
=================================================================
DATE: August 10, 1990
TO: Mayor and city Council
FROM: ~BGary R. Berger, city Administrator
SUBJECT: Request For Final Payment for Bergerson Caswell,
Inc.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Attached please find a letter from Darrell Oman recommending
final payment to Bergerson Caswell, Inc., as well as approval of
a change order (see page 2 of attached letter for explanation),
for work performed in abandonment of four water wells at Kem
Milling.
Mr. Oman recommends that a final payment be made to Bergerson
Caswell Inc., in the amount of $18,391.56 ($12,760.00 for the bid
amount plus $5,631.56 for additional costs incurred).
RECOMMENDATION:
. Staff recommends that a final payment in the amount of $18,391.56
be authorized for Bergerson Caswell, Inc. for removal of the four
water wells at the Kem Milling site.
ACTION REQUIRED:
If Council concurs with the staff recommendation, they should
authorize an expenditure of $18,391.56 payable to Bergerson
Caswell, Inc., as a final payment for water well abandonment at
the Kem Milling site.
GRB:madlr
attachment
.
,-
.
Client: Village of Arden Hills DELTA ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSULTANTS, INC.
Address: 1450 West Highway 96 1801 Highway 8 . Suite 114
St Paul, MN 551"
Arden Hills, MN 55112 612/636.242
Attention: Mr. Gary Berger Date: August 10, 1990
SUBCONTRACTOR INVOIeE REVIEW FORM
Project Name: KEM Milling
Project Location: Arden Hills, Minnesota
Delta Project No.: 10-89-385.01 Client No.: NIA
ISSUE PAYMENT TO:
Subcontractor Name: Bergerson Caswell, Inc.
Subcontractor Address: 5115 Industrial Street
Invoice Date: June 27, 1990 Invoice Number: NIA
Amount of Invoice: $21,021.10 and $4,700"00 Date Received: Julv 3. 1990
Activity Code: 230 State Reimbursement Code: .
Description of Work Performed by Subcontractor
1. Abandoned four wa ter wells.
Payment Recommendation L Full Payment _ Partial Payment
If partial payment, recommended payment amount: $18,39L56
Reason for partial payment: Additional costs approved by Delta and reviewed by Bergerson Caswell
are discussed in the attached letter.
If you have any questions regarding this invoice review form, please contact me at 612/636-2427.
Sincerely,
DELTA ENVIRONMENTAL CONSUU'ANTS, INC.
j C1 .
\ (\.
L ~{l/l~-
U
Darrell J. Oman
Environmental Assessment Manager
1007/3-89
.
. .~ ~~!!!tal
Ala. Consultants, Inc.
1801 Highway 8, Suite 114
St Paul, MN 55112
612/636-2427
FAX:612/636-8552
August 10, 1990
Mr. Gary R. Berger
Village of Arden Hills
1450 West Highway 96
Arden Hills, MN 55112
Subject: Kern Milling - Well Abandonment
Bergerson-Caswell Invoice Review
Arden Hills, Minnesota
Delta No. 10-89-385
Dear Mr. Berger:
Delta Environmental Consultants, Inc. (Delta), has completed the review of Bergerson-Caswell's
invoices dated June 26 and 27, 1990 (attached).
. In reviewing these invoices, Delta itemized the additional costs for work completed beyond the
original work scope" These additional costs are itemized below.
. Addition of well casing extensions during demolition work $ 368.00
. Airlifted/cleaned four-and six-inch supply wells $ 2,080.00
. Additional grouting time (wells deeper than
estimated) $ 484.65
. Additional grout (wells deeper than estimated) $ 2,528.25
. Pea rock for abandonment work in bedrock wells $ 170.66
TOTAL ADDITIONAL COSTS $ 5,631.56
.
Practical Solutions to Environmental Concerns
-"
"-
Mr. Gary Berger .
Delta No. 10-89-385
August 10, 1990
Page 2
Delta met with Mr. John Gilbertson of Bergerson-Caswell on July 11, 1990, to review the bid costs
and the additional costs as identified by Delta. It was agreed that all work completed under the
bid specifications would be held to the bid amount of $12,760. Therefore, the total project cost
is the sum of the bid amount and the approved additional costs"
Bergerson-Caswell bid amount $12,760.00
Total Additional Costs $ 5.63156
Total Project Cost $18.39156
Delta recommends full payment of $18,39156 to Bergerson-Caswell for the completion of the well
abandonment work. Given that Bergerson-Caswell's original invoices totaled $25,712.10, this yields
an invoiced variance of $7,32054. Delta will retain all supporting documentation for these cost
reductions in our project file.
In addition, a summary of the well abandonment work and the well abandonment records
completed by Bergerson-Caswell are forthcoming in Delta's final Kern Milling Report.
Please call me or Mr. Darrell Oman if you have any questions or comments regarding the above
information at (612) 636-2427.
Sincerely, .
~ ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC.
- 1 /)
-f 'U
. cAA~W/'/-'j.;,,,~
(~"p"~ Paul L. Lucas C/
;IJ"rngmlO""
. 72
c:v~~,-"cf) C .'"lA-~-
FJ,~ Darrell Oman
Environmental Assessment Manager
Enclosure
PLUjmp
cc: John Gilbertson - Bergerson-Caswell
.
----
COUJ0CIL HINUTES DATE PAGE
SUBJECT:
. DISCUSSION:
~/';' ,f ~uJ ~ ~7k4f7 -
"Y~ ~
~ -
-
-- SPA~
-
'~
.-
--
~-:-- (j) W
" e:2
-- M
=1-~~~
(rIALONE) (GROHE) (HAHOWALD)
Se.conded: SATHER) 'CILHER: (HANSEN) (HALONE) (GRQ\,IE) (HAHO\,ALD)
h~ ~~~ lV.t I
t/ v
\ ~-
" -""""~,
NAYS:
--
Hansen Halone Sather Hansen Halone Sather
. Grm.;e Haho'i.Jald GroHe Ma hO\.73 1d
ABSTAIN: TOTAL: ( - - )
~ -----_.- --
Hansen Malo!'!.e Sathel: Gro'V.,'e ?-laho,.lald Ayes Nays Abs"
ALSO PRESENT: elk/Administrator _____.___.All: 0 rue j _____)'reas u re r__~ Enginee r ___~_.
Parks Director Pub, h1k5. Supervisor Planner Dep, elk
-~---_._-- -
..
COUNCIL HlNUTES ~JfM-," " DATE PAGE
SUBJECT:
. DlSCiJSSlON:
-
.
"--
-,
--.-.--.. -------- ------
oved: OjAYOR SATHER) COUNClLMBR: (HANSEN) ("rALONE) (GROI~E) ,~OHALDJ'J")
ecanded: (cjAYOR SATHER) COUNClLHBR: ~NSEN0 (HALONE) (GROHE) (clAHOIMLD)
en W"''1i/~ / iO()
'. .. . (J ~ -/ --___=__.
VOTE: AYES: ~_._-- NAYS: D
Hansen Malone Sather Hansen Malone Sather
Grmve Ha hmvd 1d Cro':..le ria 1101';.'1 1d
.ABSTAIN:, TOTAL: ( - )
",. --------------
I-Jansen :1alone Sather Grm.Je i'f2hoYlald Ayes Nays Abs.
ALSO PRESENT: elk/Administrator ~_.___Attornej' ______._ Treasure.r~~__Englneer~_
Parks Director Pub. ~.Jks . Supervi_sor Planner Dep" Clk
-~'-
... -~''=''''!...'''',':''''''':'-''''~''-'':>'.~..."...~~,~. ~..~, .-.........
. J~'~ CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
T V
MEMORANDUM
. ------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE: August 17, 1990
TO: Mayor and city Council
FROM: Gary R. Berger, city Administrator
SUBJECT: Final Budget Worksession Agenda
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
MONDAY, AUGUST 20 - 2:00 - 4:30 PM
I. 2:00 - 2:05 Introduction - Berger
II. 2:35 - 3:30 Capital Equipment - Berger - Winkel - Buckley
III. 3:30 - 4:30 Wrap-up
IV. 4:30 - 5:30 Break for Dinner (served at City Hall)
V. 5:30 PM city Council Work Session (Packets distributed
previously) .
.
GRB:madlr
attachments
.
----------
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
. CA>'ITAL EXPENDITURE FIVE YEAR PLANNING WORKSHEET
$ OUTLAY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRO-RATING SEPT. ITEM 1989 1m 1991 1992 1993
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
100% PARKS HAND MOWER/WEED EATER I 1,0(10 I I I I I
I I I I I I
100% WATER WATER VAN (REPLACE> I 30,000 I I I I I
I I I I I I
100% STREETS CRACK FILLER I 5, 000 I I I I I
I I I I I I
lOOl' WATER METERS I 3,000 I 5,500 I I I I
I I I I I I
lOOl' PARKS 3/4T 4X4 PICKUP (REPlACE) I 14,620 I I I I I
I I I I I I
100% SEWER LIFT STATION i 6 I 12,0OQ I I I I I
I I I I I I
lOOl' STREETS STREET SWEEPER (NEW) I 10,000 I 11, 00(l I 11, 0(10 I I I
I I I I I I
100% PARKS PERRY PARK HEATER I 1,100 I I I I I
I I I I I I
100% STREETS GALT/SAND SPREADER (NEW) I I 1,800 I I I I
I I I I I I
25~ SE/WT/ST/PK GMC TANK TRUCK (REPlACE) I I 50,0(10 I I I I
I I I I I I
. 33~ SE/WT/ST DDDGE PICKUP (REPlACE) I I 12,500 I I I I
I I I I I I
l00~ PARKS WORK MASTER (TORD) I I 9,600 I I I I
I I I I I I
100~ SEWER LIFT STATION # 8 I I 12,000 I I I I
I I I I I I
33% SE/WT/ST ADD PICKUP I I 14, 5(~1 I I I I
I I I I I I
l00~ PARKS TRAILER I I I I I I
LAWN VAC. I I I I I I
LAIJN SllEEPER I I 14,000 I I I I
I I I I I I
l00~ PARKS TORO MOWER I I 12,950 I I I I
I I I I I I
100% STREETS COMPACTOR I I 2,000 I I I I
50% SE/WT MUD PUi'IP I I 600 I I I I
I I I I I I
l00~ PARKS HAND MOWER I I I I I I
WEED EATER I I I I I I
CHAIN SAW I I 1,500 I I I I
I I I I I I
33% SE/WT/ST B6 FORD 1 TON (REPlACE) I I I 28,0(10 I I I
I I I I I I
33~ SE/WT 1ST 86 FORD 1 TON (REPLACE) I I I 28,000 ! I I
I I I I I I
100~ PARKS lORD MOWER I I I 15,000 I I I
. I I I I I I
100~ PARKS SPRAYER I I I 2,500 I I I
I I I I I I
10\1~ PARKS PUSH MOWER I I I 650 I I I
1989 1990 1991 1992 1993
! I I I I I
. loo~ PARKS WEED EATER I I I 650 I I I
I I I I I I
loo~ PARKS CHAIN SAW I I I 500 I I I
I I I I I I
IOO~ PARKS FLAIL MOWER I J I I 2,000 I I
I I I I I I
I(l()j( PARKS TURF AEAATOR I I I I 2,000 I I
I I I I I I
33% Sf/WT/ST REPlACE J. D. 544 I I I I 80,000 I I
I I I I I I
25% Sf/WT/ST/PK BOB CAT W/TRAlLER I I I I 20,000 I I
I I I I I I
33% Sf/WT/ST REPLACE RUDDER TRUCK I I I I 75,000 I I
I I I I I J
50~ SE/WT REPLACE HONDA GENERATOR I I I I 1,000 I I
I I I I I I
50% Sf/lIT REPLACE COLEIIAN GENERATOR I I I I 1,000 I I
I I I I I I
33% SE/WT/ST CHAIN SAW I I I I 750 I I
I I I I I I
25~ SE/WT/ST/PK SOD CUTTER I I I I 1,500 I I
I I I I I I
25:i SE/WT/ST/PK AIR POST POUNDER I I I I 750 I I
I I I I I I
33~ SE/WT/ST REPLACE FORD RANGER I I I I 15,000 I I
. I I I I I I
33% SE/WT/ST copy MACHINE P.W. I I I I 3,500 I I
I I I I I I
25% SE/WT/ST/PK WElDER (WIRE FEED) I I I I 2,000 I I
I I I I I I
100% PARKS WEED EATER I I I I &50 I I
I I I I I I
100% PARKS PUSH MOWER I I I I &50 I I
I I I I I I
100% PARKS REPLACE 3/4 T PU W/PlOW I I I I 20,000 I I
I I I I I I
5O~ SE/WT HONDA PUMP I I I I I 300 I
I I I I J I
20% SE/WT/ST/PK AIR COMPRESSOR I I I I I 5,000 I
BUILDINGS I I I I I I
I I I I I I
ICKI% STREETS SAlT/SANDER SPREADER I I I I I 2,500 I
I I I I I I
20% Sf/WT/ST/PK RADiAl ARM SAW I I I I I 9".,0 I
BUILDINGS I I I I I I
iOO~ STREETS STREET SWEEPER I I I I I 100,000 I
I I I I I I
:n'.i SE/WT/ST REPlACE j5& 5-10 P.U. I I I I I 17,0(J(] I
I I I I I I
33~ SE/WT/ST REPLACE j 10 1/2 T P.U. I I I I I 1&,000 I
I J I I I I
. 50~ SE/WT HONDA PUMP I I I I I 500 I
I I I I I I
33~ SE/WT/ST JACK HAMMER I I I I I 2,500 I
J I I I I I
.
1989 1990 1991 1992 1993
13~ SElWT/ST AI R COMPRESSOR I I I I I 5,000 I
. I I I I I I
33% SE/WT/ST REPLOCE # 1 DUMP TRUCK I I I I I 70,000 I
I I I I I I
100l' STREETS SALT ISIlNDER SPREADER I I I I I 2,500 I
I I I I I I
33% SE/WT/ST BlACK-TOP ROLLER & TRA I LE I I I I I 13, 500 I
I I I I I I
33% SE/WTlST WATER VAN I I I I I 35, 000 I
I I I I I I
100% PARKS REPLACE 1 T W/PLOW & BOX I I I I I 28, 000 I
I I I I I I
100% PARKS TORO MOWER I I I I I 15,000 I
I I I I I I
100% PARKS ,\.ISH MOWER I I I I I 750 I
I I I I I I
lOOl' PARKS WEED EATER I I I I I 650 I
TOTAL SEWER UTI LI TY 12,000 33,49'3 18,667 65,146 54, 590
TOTAL WATER UTILITY 33,000 27, 300 18,667 65,146 54,590
TOTAL . STREETS 15,000 36,601 29,666 64,146 159,190
TOTAL . PARKS 16,720 50,550 19,300 31,3&2 45,590
TOTAL . BUilDINGS 1,190
~OTAl ~LL FUNDS -------------------------------------------------
76, 7'20 147;950 86, 300 225,8(>" 315,150
. GENERAL FUND (USES TAX LEVY)
.
r\:ltJ/tl\
~/
/\UgllSt 17. J990
. To: /\.H. Coundlmembers and Staff
From: Tom Sather
Re: '91 Budget
I regret that Business has called me out of town on Monday. I offer the following
as my thoughts for the budgets final form. I went through the cuts proposed on
Wednesday by Gary and can support most of staff's recommendations.
Mayor/Council
351 printing 7500
Elections
570 optiscan 6000
Adnlinistration
301 audit fees 1000
Gen. Gov't
223 Bldg. grounds 10000
580 Inisc,equip. 10000
Police/Animal Control
313 RCSD 12000
550 CSO ,,,,,,hide 7000 .'
. Inspection
300 Bldg Insp" 8000
317 Rendering Plant 2,)00
Streets
40R Pavement rngmt. 100000
550 ..~uton1otive 5000
580 Misc. Equip. 8125
Park Maint
550 Automotive 15000
580 Mise" f2quip. 1625
Fire Proteet:inn
I'd propose splitting line 314 into operating and capital
Based on vv-hat the fire departznent COlnes back with on
hlonc1ay, I'd suggest the follov,."ing:
314 Operating Expense 170000
314/\ Capital 30000
This is under the figure of 210000 that we suggested on
\"~lednesday a~) being acceptablt~, but I sL~~.;pect that as
we see the actual nUlnbers that they present .on f..rlonday!
their data \vill show far less actual operating expen5C' than
they are requesting in their budget.
Finance IJirector
. /",.5 discllssed 011 Wednesday, I'd reconl111end that 150/0 of the
Finance Ijirector salarylbenefits be charged to the general fund.
Baiance ot saiarY/benetlts UP spJll LJetwept1 \VatE:;.f and Sewer
11liJilies" .
Revenue
Park/Program fees
In our first budget: session on .l~ugust 9, we directed
the park director to increase program revenue. The
number of $10000 sticks in my head" I think that we need
instruct the park department to increase revenue by
a figure near $20000. Our approval of the "Program
Supervisor" position required that revenue be generated
to offset the cost of the position. This budget does not
provide for that increase.
Increase .Program Fund Revenue from 56u88 to 75000.
Balancing The Budget:
In prior years we have used PIR fund interest to balance
the General Fund. Last year we used a certificate of Indebted-
for our capital items. It appears that we do not have as many
capital items as last year and for that reason, I would prefer
Last Years approach again rather than a PIR transfer.
<
This years budget has been a difficult tinle for all of us. It is
the tin1€' of the year when 'fuses' are shorter than 110rn1a1 and .
all of us are stretched, I 'w'ol.lld like to thank each any everyone
of you for your efforts during thjf':, difficult tin1t~.
.
---
. .A..ugllst 17..1990
To: Council & Staff
.Frorn: TOil1 Sather
Re: BAA
.l~lL.ner reading the rnaterial frOIl1 attorney Filla,. it IS lny reCO.111n1endation
that a separate B.A.....<'\. be elilllinatcd and the duties be assumed by members
of the Planning COI111nissiDI1.
,
.
.
. ALtg"s t 17, 1990
To: AH Council
Frotn: Ton1 Sather
Re: i\ssessment Policy
Based on the reeon1111endatiol1s of TvrSA and the finanee COlTIIllittee I offer
nl)' thoughts. T will list J11Y concerns in the order of the Finance COlTIlnittee
111erno dated 6j28/i)O.
J) in full agreement with Fe ,md IvlSA
2) in agreetnent w'ith Fe' proposaJ
3)Prefer FC proposal
4)OK
5) ..Agree \./ith FC, however burtl,t:.'n is on the council to update" fce's regularly.
6) OK
7) OK -
8') FC proposal is good, ho\vever, llU.::e the "collector" an::8. asseSSl11ent idea
. propDsed by !vISA.
9) Prefer FC recolllluendatiol1
10) I feel that all appurtenances shDuld be assessed al 100%.
This leads to a Council Polk)" decision a_s to 'weather side"\\ralks
or other appurten<":'illCf'S shou~ld be included 8S 'sfandard' on
reconstruct.ion projects.
1J) \\1110 \l,,:iJI \vrite the hardship deferral polley?
Finance Conlnlittee
f'ijia
1"2)01<
LJ) ??"????
J.4) 110'';': du we do this? Doe,,; Fe' ll1t'21il aS5es,sing only "our" cost
or the cost of the p.nllre project?
15) Could the J..lolicy to devlE:llc be different for each zoning classification?
Can \ve identify potential problenl areas no-w?
.
.
,.
~ 't:NJ!; .
~~.. ~ ~~JJ2t{ d~ . y;.u
. u/ ~) ~I /
sr..
.~ ."
n. tJ~. (2,e& )'
. @E7~~5le;t~ ~ I~~M()~,
@ ~'6\~ - ()JJl P ~ -h yX w-to -
V~..'~~ -NiU~~-
JY1 tj ;W
. ~)~1AG.fo,~~
uJ/~-f c-~cto~
~ 70 -2'D1IW'-fu ~ +
iJ ~ ~H I ~~
~'Aub-'
.
. 1>&1J. - "'
( -;t-- /7 f7
+- ....(}JO ~
._--_...__._--------_.._---_..---~--_..~-_...__.---~----------------~~-----
-
.
,
~ -~at~'.~~~-
~~~ ~ flUii ~Pl!,~
.~ ~(?J!1-
{f)~~1r ~ics.(ft~~ ~
. .....~~.
~)J ~
~. ~ JM v iD ~1
, 1/( (10
2J 0 c ~. __~ i(/(rO
. ,..-,.."";--. -
~--
u~~
- - "
~....-.-.-_.- -.-.-.- ---.- -..- -..-..-..-..-..-... --- --..- ---..-..- ---- ---- ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ - ~
.
. j~<i~.~ {gf-~.~
. .~-/~_.-
..---
__ Q Mvil. io ~,C!,~ U- -
.
...~~..........__w......~...~.~_~_____________________-----
.
-~ (tv
~4P'j -~~ ~-
~/fws~~~~ .~
~ td.k~Ir~""
y)~~201o --. ..-~-
-(7 3G-ff.~ - M -~r:::::;~
;"~-
) Z -1&-6(;; -ff - t7r~S"'~
. ol1.~- ,
~ dOD 1..~.d~lh4 ~Q
~i ~
OvL-~~ ~~1Qr6
I U .
11MQ/ )J.o:;InJ'J rjW.~- 4~f
uYJt!~I\1ln<L ~ cfo ~ ~
. . V->~~-
--
- - - - - - - - - - - ---
- -----
.
.
~.-~~~l
~IJ). r
'~1J~ )1/3
~ /tJtJ4?c;
IZ . d02%
I 3
?< p~
~_50~~~Y,~~
~ - u U J::-.2t;iv U 1Ud-
~ ('rLgA-Ss~
110; OUD ~ 'i?h 0-J2 ~
J~lmv -~-
. ~~~ 't~ ~r-
. ~~...
'~'r-~' cf-o J.
)" 0-4..t(!
1i1 11t;~J1/ (()()~ - .~
,
, I
I .' , I
~ -~ i
___/ ; dk" .. 1 ......
.' I I \
I. "".
_ _!)(' il" "! ". .
! . _;oJo_r;> I
___'" lU"'" \"Y/{
~I I . 1 r
.
-- -- -----
.
.
· @) Wi1i. {}14 {L / )hJ tTL ~'f-
.~ 1). ~
. AI... \
. ~/tU /0')0/6 tf^- ~ dL
~? ~~ D20~
@ &f
. I
.
1t .-
~
~/tV~ /fUA
~~ ~--,.
.~
~.
- ----