HomeMy WebLinkAboutCCP 07-13-1992
,.-) .'
. If.-f-/
L ,~. ~':{.{I
,
ARDEN !fITLU! CITY CXlUNCIL MEEll'Im j
!
, CXlUNCIL CIDIMIlEIlS
!DlDAY, JULY 13, 1992, 7:30 P.M.
. 1. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL. 7:30 P.M.
2. AGENDA AOOPI'ION
3. APPROVAL OF JUNE 29 mUNCIL MINUI'ES
4. mNSENT CALENDAR
a. Adopt Res. No. 92-46 Relating to Reapportionment of Assessments
Relating to Improvement No. 91-BITOlAY (1991 Bituminous Overlay).
b. Approve Estimate #1 - 1992 Tiller Lane ~vements.
c. , Approve Pay Estimate #4 for 1991 North Snelling Avenue
Improvements .
d. Adopt Ordinance No. 289 Relating to Residential Recycling Fees.
e. Approve List of Claims/Payroll.
5. PUBLIC CX>>IMENTS
. PllBLIC IIEARINGS:
6. Keithson Pond Assessment Hearing 7:30 p.m. (Continued from June 8,
1992).
7. UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS
A. Adopt Ordinance No. 288 Inq:losing a Development Moratorium.
B. Case No. 92-06; Amend SUP, Amoco oil Ccmpmy, 1306 West County
. Road E - Amoco.
C. Case No. 92-12; Minor SUJ:xlivision/wt Split, Alpo Pet Foods, 4251
Fernwood Avenue North.
/,: DiBamsion of Drnft ~'" "'" _; ""'" "'-09; Site Plan
Review, What-A-Raa;IUet Sports Club, Dennis Foster.
E. Adopt Res. No. 92-46 Accepting the Bid in the Matter of the 1992
street Cold In-Place Recycling Improvements.
I F. Adopt Res. No. 92-47 Establishing Commercial/Industrial Assessment
Rate for 1992 Cold In-Place Recycling Improvements.
i r- G.~ Adopt Res. No. 92-48 Determining Assessed Cost of ImprOvement and
\ , .AfV ordering Preparation of Proposed Assessment Roll in the Matter of
~ the 1992 street Cold In-Place Recycling Improvements.
H Update of North Snelling Avenue Driveway Issue.
.
8. mUNCIL <X'MMENTS
9. ADJOURN
JULY MEEI'INGS AUGUST MEETINGS
July 1 - Planning Canun, 7:30 pm August 5 - Planning Canun, 7:30 pm
July 3 - INDEPENDENCE DAY (HOLIDAY) August 10- Council Mtg, 7:30 pm
July 13- Council Mtg, 7:30 pm August 20- Public Sfty/Wks, 7:30 pm
July 16- Public SftyjWks, 7:30 pm August 25- Park & Rec Canun, 7:30 pm
July 20- Council Worksession, 4:30 pm August 27- Finance Canun, 7:30 pm
. July 23- Finance Canun, 7:30 pm August 31- Council Mtg, 7:30 pm
July 27- Council Mtg, 7:30 pm
July 28- Park & Rec Canun, 7:30 pm
.
.
M 1)6,
v1otLU- c/p ~
~c~
~ ~-11~'jY
.
-
~ ~j~al. ~~
."~~ /J
./ 14-fffjr~ .
'1'1 ~ .. - t2.~
AA (1!
~ &K-diee ~ 70 .-
~-&f~4 -~~
_-. n-c~
~._ f;<-f/? ~ ,ep~/~' ~E-
~ P--Yj/- ~/ ,k-Ifi'-
f/;Li'I Cj/ ~ U G
~'.'
;.
".;"
-
~5'--'~ /
~., . /
( /;/ // ' ~ V
'\ - /' .. --~- ..
"'--.// " ///'-'''j --? -"
62_"':1)"'" (h....//'
/_ . ,-:4""'/' / ..' 1'--'
1/ / .a '('---. - ---<"./. / . / './
,,T;, .J .// '. ...'/ ~~ .'-. - \ ../
l../ ". ".,c{-j)_/'l'~ /<--.~... ......-----..'1 -- ,./
C., a(/c--- ~ .. .
.F ii" " .-' ../
/1 .'. ./
j' - -----,' '--' ---' ~ //<
- /" -.'- ~ -' j/.~--- . . - - -
~_.- ~/ 1/ _"/l/~'- --
l .." ~/I _C"
/
(j) ~:-(
---------- --
~--~-
-----
uP- /~ \
(~
'e
--------------.--
,~ . ._______ ____n.____ __.~~__ __~.
(f)@- ~:~
J? /, , .' -;-. .- j~C ,//J
M,~ ~~ '~-fr ·
,,- ~ I "-" ~-~
:/ 1
~. r ,~
\ I ,11' It' .
tJ.: ffPJliJlr~ v1L: c- ~n
.,/ ~ ~
/) /1J AM JI'ilJi ' ,.lIrt) () .
VIVVVWf~ (f~-- '
___'M"'_-' ........"
'- -- /.
"III!""'" .....
jf . .
, . 'j
I ,l:
'/' i ",. .'. /' '
i' \, 'v(~..,.. '.:,_. /
'.' .. . . '
""_. _. ,~_.,.__~.,.,-....(, .~:-'"L _ .._ ~.
'. ,-- ,.. i - .....1 -~.. . ."--
,(/ - I, " -".. --,
,) 'I' 'o'fl// -- -, ~,.
/." I" ," / .' , /, ----.. ~
~.<1-' _,__'" .' _---,'. .,<' ,.,..:.."....,. " . J.
_" ,.. ,.A!c,_- [.(..0"./,./. ,d "'_.." I '
- . -
" ~'1:"',L...N' "1'" /""~_____,~.,,c_" .: -., .--
,".' '.i','" ",.~",.--"-- -,-'" ......._-' f -,.'
~,,\'x::,'/'.j~/'." " ,,;" '. ~_. ]..' ~
/, . .,/7 \' ',/\ !-
i/'''.:-.~ . j
/., '.' I
J' \. ","'\-
/ I / _ ......-..' , . I
J f.;;}--"--, . / .,.- '! "._d ." f ,/
! ,/' r.\ .4".,., 'p'
I ~ ' -"I' /1".'
~ "'-'/lf' .' '~"."-' /' .- ' - '..'
-7' k(\ (;)' (~ 2)/ .... .-'
" j,,"
//)/; ",1'-.--:: .'" __ ,.-.-
". .' .
If " /' " '. .F
. , /. /1" . :I
.{,_ ",' . ..r';! . i ,I) ."....--_. '
-'" '."~"-.,. . '.1);'" ../ ,. . '. r<..I, .,/ ..,
, "" ", ~1' I'" ~-'
;[ ',./- ;:' '.
'./ '
1\GENDA
. 1\RDEN HILLS CITY CXlUNCIL MEElrING (!.~<(
CXlUNCIL amMBERS - ~~/?3~
~, JULY 13, 1992, 7:30 P.M.
MI ~IDam ~
7/&r~
~~~~ - /ipk IJtJAI ~~ 3-7)
3. APPf7;t; f:txi ;~ C;C? V 3-0
4. rSENr ~ I/~I J/WnrL - &; S-fL
c.
d.
. e.
5. PUBLIC O>>IMENTS ~~c.
~c(
'ASSESSMENT HEARING CDNTINUED FRCM 6-08-92). 7:30 P.M.
J -
- ~
-
r-
~
,
,
~ i-f"'
~~ ~O ~~ - tfS-~7
P1\GE 2
. 1\GENDl\.
ARDEN HILIB cny CXXJN:)IL MEETIm
CXXJN:)IL CIDIMIlERS
~Y, JULY 13, 1992, 7:30 P.M.
6. 7:30 P.M.
.
-
--
~~-
.
.
P1\GE 3
. AGENDA
ARDEN HILIB CITY CXlUK:IL MEE:'1'IN3
CXlUK:IL CHAMBERS
~Y, JULY 13, 1992, 7:30 P.M.
7.
A. . -
~-
B.
-----~
-
~
.....
~"'IfI- ~ J JJ,...J.W ._~.--
.
~ Cf~-,(7-
-#r~ "
G.
H.
(!,PI- - e ~jW
~
~.!81JO ~~r~_
,
P1\GE 4
. 1lGENDl\
ARDEN HILIB CITY OOUNCJ:L MEm'ING
OOUNCJ:L CII1\MBERS
!oIlI!lDAY, JULY 13, 1992, 7:30 P.M.
8. ~. aMIDITS_ tcro~ _ ~_ ~~
,;. ry~-
.
_.----'~ !
.
/'
------- "
.
9. ADJOURN ". ./ ~/.
/."J V . '-"'. " .........\:
..,.' . _// ..-."- ,/.-. ... -' ..
.' ", '-.- -.' --
~ 15'1 .
{ l j,;q ., .
'.:r,'\/~"~
I
, , \
. MINUTES
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
June 29, 1992
7:30 P.M. - City Hall
CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
Note Council met at 6:30 p.m. with the architect to discuss
new City Hall plans.
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Sather called
to order the regular City Council meeting at 7:30 p.m.
Present: Mayor Thomas Sather; Councilmembers JoAnn Growe,
Dale Hicks, Paul Malone. Council absent: Thomas Mahowald.
Also present were: City Engineer, Mark Graham; Public Works
Superintendent, Dan Winke 1 ; Acting Clerk Administrator,
Catherine Iago; Recording Secretary, Foster.
P.DOPT AGENDA
With regard to agenda item 8C "Discussion on Site Plan
Review Application - Dennis Foster", Council agreed to a
. request from the applicant's attorney to postpone that item
un t il the July l3, 1992 Council meeting.
MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Hicks, to adopt the June 29,
1992 agenda excluding item 8C. Motion carried
unanimously (4-0).
APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MINUTES
with regard to "Budget Information" on page l6 of the June
8, 1992 Council minutes, councilmember Malone requested the
second paragraph be revised to read that he was "satisfied
with the completeness of the report provided by Mr. Post".
MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Growe, to approve the minutes
of the June 8, 1992 Regular Council Meeting as
prepared. Motion carried unanimously (4-0).
CONSENT CALENDAR
MOTION: Hicks moved, seconded by Growe to approve the Consent
Calendar and authorize execution of all necessary
documents contained therein. Motion carried
unanimously (4-0) .
. a. Approve Final Estimate (Pay Estimate #1) - 1992
Bike Trail Improvements.
b. Adopt Resolution No. 92-43 Pot-O-Gold Bingo Hall
Application License.
I , ,
Arden Hills Council 2 June 29, 1992 .
c. Acknowledge Receipt of Recruitment Procedures and
Authorize Expenditure to The Brimeyer Group,
Inc. - City Administrator Recruitment.
d. Acknowledge Trade Name and Corporate Officer
Changes for On-Sale Licensee, Minneapolis Motel
Enterprises, Inc. / dba Ramada Inn.
e. Authorize Hiring Replacement Seasonal Employees.
f. Approve List of Claims/Payroll.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
IMPROVEMENT HEARING FOR ARDEN PLACE
Mayor Sather opened the meeting at 7:36 p.m. for the purpose
of conducting a public hearing on Arden Place Drainage
Improvement. Acting Clerk Administrator Iago verified
publication of the notice of hearing in the New Brighton
Bulletin on Wednesday, June 17 and 24, and mail ing to
affected property owners on June 17, 1992.
City Engineer Graham reported that in September, 1991 , a .
feasibility study and plans and specifications were prepared
to replace an existing drainage pipe that extends from the
low area behind 1553 Arden Place to the south across Arden
Place, and between l540 and l548 Arden Place. He added that
the cost of the project was estimated at $20,800 (incl uding
the lowest construction bid of $16,675 and 25% overhead).
He commented that the existing pipe does not appear to be
placed within an easement, but it may be legally possible to
claim a prescriptive easement so no easement acquisition
costs would apply.
Graham stated that questions were raised during October 1991
public hearings on this project relative to easements,
placement of the pipe, cost, and water quality; which led to
further research of alternative options to address this
drainage issue.
Graham explained a second option is to install a pipe to the
Lake Johanna Beach Club property, at an estimated cost of
$30,000. This option would cost more than the original
option primarily due to the need for additional length of
pipe. Easement acquisition costs are unknown but Graham
expected a minimal cost.
Graham's preference was the original option of a direct .
route to Lake Johanna.
. Arden Hills Council 3 June 29, 1992
The following public comments/questions were received:
Deb Thornton, 3510 Siems Court: My neighbors and I will
file a case in District Court if we are assessed on the
basis that we are receiving no benefit and no increased
market value. This problem is between the City and the two
homeowners who are experiencing water problems. An
appraiser would agree that neighbors receive no benefit and
therefore cannot be assessed.
Mayor Sather reminded the public that this evening's meeting
is to receive input with regard to the project itself , that
assessment concerns will be addressed at a later assessment
hearing, if such a hearing is necessary.
Arnold Lindberg, 3520 Siems Court: I concur with Ms.
Thornton. The option of routing to Lake Johanna Beach Club
has merit. The option of a direct route to Lake Johanna
involves easement and ecological concerns. Whil e there is a
definite need to address the drainage issue, my contention
lS that it is the City's problem and should be a paid for by
the City. I will fight an assessment.
. Esther Dant, 3511 Ridgewood Road: I concur with Ms.
Thornton. When our neighborhood was developed I was of the
understanding that the existing pipe simply needed cleaning.
The City is responsible to pay the cost of addressing the
issue.
Brad Lis, 1548 Arden Place: will my property value be
raised? There is no existing easement through my property
if the direct route to Lake Johanna is used. Has Rice
Creek Watershed District approved the direct route option?
I would like to see their study. Because of fertilizer run-
off, ete, the channel to Lake Johanna will turn into a swamp
if the direct route option is used.
Engineer Graham reported that in discussions with Rice Creek
Watershed District they indicated acceptance of the direct
route option; they do have studies available to the public
as to the effect of fertilizers on water supplies.
Dale Noyed, 3505 Ridgewood Road: Why has the' cost of the
original option increased? The existing pipe does drain
somewhat. Why not just clean it out? Since the existing
pipe has been in place for years wouldn't the City pick up
the costs now?
. Mayor Sather stated that, generally speaking, the City's
assessment policy incl udes a cost sharing procedure whereby
the City typically pays a sizable portion of costs.
However, the Council has not deliberated as to how the costs
- .._~
Arden Hill s Council 4 June 29, 1992 .
of this project will be handled.
Engineer Graham and Public Works Superintendent Winkel
reported that the City has attempted to unplug the existing
p1pe several times and believe that the pipe is of different
sizes and is possibly broken somewhere which magnifies the
problem. Al so it 1S thought that the existing pipe would
simply plug again in the future, so a permanent solution is
necessary. Graham said the costs discussed at last fall's
public hearing were estimates for construction only.
John Lundgren, 3487 Ridgewood Road: Assuming the direct
route option is used, could the path of the pipe be shifted
somewhat to reduce its effect on my property and potential
tree loss?
Engineer Graham said estimated costs do take tree loss into
consideration.
John Halvorsen, 3517 Ridgewood Road: How is benefi t
determined?
Engineer Graham stated that an appraiser determines benefit.
He added that notice of this hearing was sent to all .
properties which potentially contribute to the drainage
problem, that simply being invited to this meeting does not
imply a potential assessment, that potentially assessable
property owners will be determined at a 1 at er time.
Deb Thornton, 3510 Siems Court: I am an attorney and my
research indicates that proving benefit is a necessity
before an assessment can be levied. The City has the
responsibility to provide proper drainage.
Councilmember Malone reiterated that the issue of benefit
for each individual lot will be determined at a later time
as part of the assessment hearing process; that the purpose
of this evening's meeting is to discuss the detail s of the
improvement.
Arnold Lindberg, 3520 Siems Court: Before a decision can be
made as to which option to use, the question of easement
acquisition must be answered.
Engineer Graham stated that it is the City Attorney's
opinion (without a complete study of the issue) that if
there is an existing pipe, there should not be an easement
problem.
Esther Dant, 3511 Ridgewood Road: I am troubled that the .
City allowed continued development of the neighborhood when
it was known that the pipe providing drainage was plugged.
,
. Arden Hills Council 5 June 29, 1992
Has Arden Hills considered a storm water utility such as
other cities have adopted?
Councilmember Malone stated that Council is in the process
of considering a storm water utility, but such a program may
not address this type of situation.
Warren McGuire, 1553 Arden place: We were told when we
purchased our property that the existing pipe drained. We
have done some landscaping to our property and hauled in
some fill which has actually improved the drainage problems
being experienced by at the Noyed property at 3505 Ridgewood
Road. (Dale Noyed nodded in agreement.)
Brad Lis, 1548 Arden place: If the direct route option is
used, I suggest some additional work such as culvert
replacement.
councilmember Malone asked Graham if placement of the pipe
in the direct route option could be shifted somewhat.
Engineer Graham said that bends in the pipe create problems,
but minor realignment could be studied. Councilmember Growe
asked if tree loss could be avoided if the placement were
. shi fted. Graham said he would check, but reminded Council
that an existing power pole and the limited construction
path must also be considered.
Councilmember Malone commented that it is clear the
improvement needs to be done, however I questions relative to
easements using either option must be answered prior to a
decision.
MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Hicks, to:
1 ) Direct the City Attorney to determine easement
acquisition costs involved in addressing Arden
place drainage problems using both of the options
outlined by the City Engineer;
2 ) Report findings to Council for consideration at
the July 20, 1992 Council worksession;
3) continue the Arden Place Improvement public
hearing at the July 27, 1992 Council meeting.
Motion carried unanimously (4-0) .
Councilmember Malone advised the public that council's July
20 worksession is an open meeting.
Council recessed briefly and reconvened.
.
-~_..-
Arden Hills Council 6 June 29, 1992 .
TINFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS
DRIVEWAY RESTORATION AT 4410 NORTH
Sr:'!J;:LL ING AVENUE - FRANCIS POD~ASEK
Francis podlasek was asked to explain the problems he has
with his driveway. He stated that everything he would say
was included in his letter to the City.
Mr. Podlasek's letter explained that he was dissatisfied
with the steepness of his driveway entrance resulting from
the reconstruction of North Snelling Avenue and appealed to
the City Council for financial reimbursement to reconstruct
his driveway and yard to conform with the new, lower
elevation road in front of his house.
Engineer Graham advised that through the process of speaking
with residents before the reconstruction project began, he
discussed with Mr. Podlasek the options available within the
project to address his driveway. Graham reported that he
proposed to Mr. Podlasek extending the bituminous patching
up his driveway to a point 40 feet from the road in an
effort to create a gradual slope to the road; however, Mr. .
Podlasek rejected that option and directed Graham to replace
blacktop only to the easement line with a slope not to
exceed 1096.
Graham added that after construction was completed per Mr.
Podlasek's direction and conforming to standards, Mr.
Podlasek expressed his dissatisfaction, Graham responded by
letter, and Mr. Podlasek's response was directed to the
Council.
Councilmember Malone stated he has viewed the driveway. He
asked Graham if elevations of the road change after a
project such as this, and who is responsible to address
that. Graham said that in many instances elevations do
change and driveways must be adjusted, that typically the
adjustment takes place within the right-of-way. He added
that the elevation change in this instance was minimal, but
apparently Mr. Podlasek disagrees, and the 40 foot driveway
cut was offered to reduce the severi ty of the slope of the
driveway, but Mr. Podlasek declined. Graham said every
reasonable attempt was made to avoid this problem.
Mr. Podlasek said some driveways affected by this project
were graded well, but he is dissatisfied with his driveway
because the slope at the end of the driveway causes vehicles
to "bottom out". He emphasized that the old driveway did .
not have the severe slope, it was caused by a change in the
elevation of the road. He added that his yard also has a
severe bank which will require landscaping or excavation.
. Arden Hills Council 7 June 29, 1992
Me Podlasek said he has spoken with contractors as to how
best to address the driveway problem and has been told that
in order to create a constant gradual slope from the garage
slab to the road, fill will need to be excavated. He added
that if he was satisfied with the driveway/road connection,
he could simply repair the old bituminous, but now, because
fill needs to be excavated, he will have to remove the old
bituminous, and will install a concrete driveway. Me
podlasek stated that he only expects the City to share costs
for the removal of the fill, not the cost of new concrete or
old bituminous removal.
Me Podlasek asked if the City authorizes the City Engineer
to destroy private property and then expect residents to
accept that. Mayor Sather reminded Mr. Podlasek that the
Engineer offered the 40' driveway cut and asked why that was
not acceptable before the project was done. Me Podlasek
said that the 40 ' idea would not address the need for
landscaping the yard alongside the driveway.
Me Podlasek said the problem was created by removing fi 11
from the roadbed which lowered the elevation of the road.
Engineer Graham said he did not believe that significant
. fi 11 was removed from the road.
councilmember Hicks commented that he was troubled that Mr.
Podlasek did not accept the 40' driveway cut idea
originally, as it would have been easier and cheaper to have
done that as part of the project rather than trying to
satisfy Mr. Podlasek now.
Councilmember Hicks asked if Graham could calculate the
amount of fi 11 which needs to be excavated from Mr.
Podlasek's driveway to meet the grade that Mr. podlasek
wants. Graham said he could calculate that amount. Hicks
added that excavation would need to accommodate the base
layer and concrete to be laid on the driveway, which would
amount to about SlX inches. Mr. podlasek agreed.
MOTION: Hicks moved, seconded by Malone, to direct the City
Engineer to calculate and report to Council the cost to
excavate Mr. Podlasek's driveway to 6" below a constant
gradual slope from the garage slab to the driveway
apron. Motion carried unanimously (4-0) .
CHARITABLE GAMBLING REGULATIONS
REVIEW/RECOMMENDATIONS
. Temporary Accountant Post reported that as directed by
Council on ,June 15, he reviewed charitable gambling
regulations, talked with the City Attorney, and recommends:
- Mandating 100% compliance with the present 10% net
--~
-----
, .
Arden Hills Council 8 June 29, 1992 .
profit con t ribut i on requirement retroactive to 1/1/92 ;
- Council consider imposing a 1% gambling tax.
- In recognition of state tax burdens, reduce trade area
spending requirements from 50% to 30%
- Initiate the use of a standardized reporting format for
charitable gambling licensees.
Post added that his research revealed that state laws, which
changed after the adoption of the City regulations, make the
City regulations somewhat unrealistic. He added that
definitions of gross profit, net profit, lawful expense,
etc. must be clearly understood by all licensees.
Mayor Sather suggested discussing this issue at the upcoming
worksession. He added that the original intent of the 50%
trade area spending requirement was to encourage local
benefit from charitable gambling. Councilmember Malone
clarified that current City regulations, when practically
applied, simply don't "work" any longer because of the
financial effect of increased state burden on licensees.
Temporary Accountant Post advised that an informal meeting
has been scheduled for July lO, the purpose of which is to
receive input from charitable gambling licensees. Counci 1 .
agreed to revisit this issue at the July 20 worksession.
DISCUSSION OF SITE PLAN REVIEW
APPLICATION - DENNIS FOSTER
Per request from Dennis Foster's attorney, Thomas Balyk,
this agenda item was moved to the July 13, 1992 regular
Council agenda.
COUNCIL COMMENTS
WORKSESSJ.mL SCHEDULING
MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Growe, to schedule a Council
worksession on July 20, 1992 at 4:30 p.m. Motion
carried unanimously (4-0).
\i.E;LTHSON POND
Councilmember Hicks thanked Councilmember Malone for
summarizing the Keithson Pond issue for communication to
residents.
DEFEASANCE OF 1985 BONDS
Temporary Accountant Post updated Council with regard to .
defeasance of 1985 bonds and stated that the Finance
Committee has studied this issue and provided
. ,
. Arden Hills Council 9 June 29, 1992
recommendations. Councilmember Malone explained why it
makes economic sense to pay off these bonds.
SHARED SERVI~ES COMMUNICATION~
Councilmember Malone commented that if shared services
communications is still being considered, Arden Hills must
express concern for the potential substantial increased
costs. Acting Clerk Administrator Iago and Public Works
Superintendent Winkel said latest information indicates
shared services communication is unlikely to occur. They
said they would keep Council advised on this issue.
ENGINEER/RESIDENT COMMUNICATION
Public Works Superintendent Winkel reported that, contrary
to this evening's agenda item regarding Mr. Podlasek's
driveway, MSA does an outstanding job of communicating with
residents and the City on construction projects.
ADJOURN
MOTION: Growe moved, seconded by Malone, to adjourn the meeting
. at 10: 40 p.m. Motion carried unanimously (4-0) .
Thomas R. Sather, Mayor Catherine J. Iago, Deputy Clerk
NOTICE OF MEETINGS:
The next regular Council meeting will be held July 13, 1992 at
7:30 p.m. at City Hall.
The next Council worksession will be held July 20, 1992 at 4:30
p.m.
.
. .
CITY OF ARDEN HILIB
. MEHEANDUM
~: JUly 2, 1992
TO: Mayor and city council J
FRCM: catherine J. Iago, Acting Clerk 1\dministrator ~
SUB.:JEC'l' : p....W"rtioranent of Improvement No. 91-BI'l'OIAY (1991
Bituninous OVerlay)
'!he attached resolution relates to the reapportiornnent of assessments
f= the property located at 1419 Arden Place.
ACTION REOUIRED:
'Ibis is a standard reapportionment resolution and a routine business
item, therefore, Council should adopt Resolution No. 92-46 Relating to
Reapportionment of Assessments Relating to IITprovement No. 91-BI'TOIAY
(1991 Bituminous Overlay) .
CJI/ts
. Attaclunents
.
.
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
. RAMSEY COUNl'Y
RESOLtJI'ICIiI' ro. 92-46
RESOLtJI'ICIiI' RELATING TO RE1\PPCRl'ICIiI'MENl' OF 1lSSmsMENl'S RELM'ING
TO IMPRCJVEMENl' ro. 91-BITOLAY (1991 BITlJMIN:lUS OVERLl\.Y)
WHERElIS, the assessment roll for Irrprovement No. 91-BITOIAY was filed and
certified to the County Auditor of Ramsey County on
, for the purpose of inc1udin;J install1nents thereof to be collected along with
real estate taxes commencin;J in 1992; and
WHERElIS, since that date a number of parcel of property contained with said
assessment roll have been divided and conveyed by previous property owners;
and
WHERElIS, the County Auditor of Ramsey County requires that apportiornnenb of
the original assessment against each =igina1 tract where it has later been
divided, sold or conveyed, be made by the City council of the City of Arden
Hills in order that the proper assessment can be extended by the County
Auditor against each parcel of property thereafter, =mmencin;J with an
assessment to be collected in the year 1992 and thereafter.
NJW, THEREFCIlE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the city council of the city of Arden Hills
does hereby make the followin;J apportiornnent or original assessmerrts as
. contained in said assessment roll of I 1992, against the
followin;J described property:
RESOllJI'ION NO. 92-46 Division No. 63771
NAME OF ASSESSMENT: Inprovement 91-BI'IOIAY DIP No. 6136
Auditor No. 6136
ORIGINAL Pili 'IUI'AL ASSESSMENl'
A. 34-30-23-21-0019-6 $ 0.00
B. 34-30-23-21-0020-6 141.45
RFJ\ProRI'IONMENl'
A. 34-30-23-21-0069-1 $ 0.00
B. 34-30-23-21-0070-1 145.45
PASSED AND ~.L'.tiU BY THE CITY cotlNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS THIS 13TH
~y OF JULY, 1992.
'Ihcnnas R. Sather, Mayor
A'I'I'ESr:
. Catherine J. Iago, Actin;J Clerk Administrator
. CONSULTING ENGINEERS
Maier Stewart & Associates Inc.
June 2, 1992
File No: 520-000-90
Ms. Cathy Iago
Acting Clerk - Administrator
City of Arden Hills
1450 W. Highway 96
Arden Hills, MN 55112
.RE: ASSESSMENT REAPPORTIONMENT
DIVISION IDA 063771
Dear Ms. Iago:
Please find enclosed the adjusted assessments for the above referenced reapportionment. Call me
if you have any questions.
. Sincerely,
MAIER STEWART AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
4~:#~ -
Mark J. Graham, P.E.
MJG/ks
enc.
000-0201.JUN
.
1959 SLOAN PLACE. SUITE 200. ST. PAUL. MINNESOTA 55117 612-774.6021
9800 SHElARD PARKWAY. SUITE 102. MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55441 612-546-0432 . Equal Opportunity Employer
.
. REAPPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA DIVISION NO. DA 06377 1
RESOLUTION NO. 46 DIP NO. 6136
NAME OF
ASS ESSM ENT 91-BITOLAY (1991 Bituminous AUDITOR'S NO. 6136
Overlay)
ORIGINAL PIN NUMBER TOTAL ASSESSMENT
A. 34-30-23-21-0019-6 $ 0.00
B. 34-30-23-21-0020-6 $ 141. 45
C. $
D. $
E. $
F. $
. G. $
REAPPORTIONMENT
A. 34-30-23-21-0069-1 $ 0.00
B. 34-30-23~21-0070-1 $ 141.45
C. $
D. $
E. $
F. $
G. $
.
--.-
.
. CITY OF 1lRDEN HILLS
MEH:IWlDUM
~: July 10, 1992
TO: Mayor and City Council
FRCM: Tery Shields, Mmin. secretary {P
SUBJECl': Pay Estimates for 1992 Tiller lane and 1992 North
snelling Avenue street ImprovEIIlents
Attached are the fOllowing for your review and =nsideration:
1., Letter dated July 7, 1992, from Engineer Graham regarding
Pay Estimate No. 1 for the 1992 Tiller Lane Illprovements in
the amount of $48,739.98 to F.M. Frattalone, Inc.
2. Letter dated July 9, 1992, fram Engineer Graham regarding
Pay Estimate No.4 for the 1991 North Snelling Avenue street
Illprovements in the amount of $63,198.73 to Midwest Asphalt,
Inc.
. RED::MMENDATION:
staff recormnends approval of the Pay Estimates descriliecl. above.
ACrION REOUIRED:
If Council =ncurs, council should make a motion under COnsent to
approve Pay Estimate No. 1 for the 1992 Tiller lane InqJrovements in the
amount of $48,739.98 to F.M. Fratta1one, Inc. and Pay Estimate No.4 for
the 1991 North Snelling Avenue street Illprovements in the amount of
$63,198.73 to Midwest Asphalt, Inc.
Attachments
1
,
.~::
. '
1"
'x
')}.
~
i
'"
"
. CONSULTING ENGINEERS
Maier Stewart & Associates Inc.
July 7, 1992
File No: 520-028-30
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Arden Hills
1450 W. Highway 96
Arden Hills, MN 55112
RE: PAY ESTIMATE NO. 1
1992 TILLER LANE IMPROVEMENTS
Dear Council Members:
Please find enclosed three copies of Pay Estimate #1, in the amount of $48,739.98, for the above
referenced project. EM. Frattalone, Inc. has completed work in the amount of $51,305.24, with
retainage in the amount of $2,565.26 withheld from payment.
. We respectfully recommend payment of Pay Estimate #1, in the amount of $48,739.98, to EM.
Frattalone, Inc., for this project. We will be in attendance at your July 13, 1992 City Council
meeting if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
MAIER STEWARf AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
/JfJ .$~
Mark J. Graham, P.E.
MJG/ks
ene.
028-0701.JUL
.
1959 SLOAN PLACE. SUITE 200. ST. PAUL. MINNESOTA 55117 612-774-6021
9600 SHElARD PARKWAY. SUITE 102. MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOfA 55441 612.546.0432 . Equal Opportunity Employer
. :'?,RTEL n~:'i'\tfF ET1t:AE
---------------------
II {
t ~
--- .,--
~ ii::;:;, ~..;~.
,'.-,'.-' .,-."
-- .----
! i!; ~i i:.0!'j~
-...--.---- :" ,~, i:"RATTALDNE, Hr.
;TU;;.'<'..i';;W'
--'.,""'.-'",0'-'
Q~?jU; nn [:j:" ~~:~!E~~ HilLS
F'RDECT: TILLE\ L~NE ST~EET I~P~CVE~ENTS ?2Q-028~
[:DNPlETI~N Ii~iE nj[;un DF C[:fn~:~[:T
{;~:! riI;'{~L: ~l!GUS- __, 1"19= %IGINHL; ~ 2 i 1.1 (\~" 0(1
Rt:\iISH': f:E'iISED: ~'-i1 ;
ITE~ CDNTRACT IE*S !HIB PERIDD TDF:L TO I1ATE
-------------------------~---------;---------------------------,---------------~---------------------_!_-----------~-~------------------------
~jG . ~EscRlnI~t{ ;u~nT @~mITY Lit~E 'QUANTITY Mwum TDTHL/PERIuD ;yUANTITY A!'lfiUNT EiTHLiTG[!~E
PRICE
___________________Mw______________1___________________________ ________________~__________~__________'____________~__-----------~------------
BCHEI)ULE 1.0 SH:EEJ ]~?t:[1VEr,EHTS
-~----------------------------
i RE~, f.jTU~INuUS SURFACING ,-" :id(i V.f') ':i~i! b:<Y&.9(: '" 6~92.9;)
."
2 CD~~DN EXCAVATIGN cr 166~' ~. ~{i t::{} 3l8~J)(; -/c.', '; .':~', ;i!:
. ~\'.'
3 SUr,B~AIfE D:e~VRnnN u :'(}60 " r", l()~'n,~,g ~ii .' lv'}i2. ~()
,.,.,' ---.
. ~ SELEtT GRANULAR BaRRu~ L1 ;,(If.(i LOO 'I",",;:. 133~() .0') ..;";':<~ 13}. ~'!J. ,)(;
l.l.L.'
:' 41 DR.~l).1 TEE LF 3000 .,..,' 8~ 14;,(}(: 84 Hf.!JG
~ BUBERADE PREPARATIuN mE --" .. !;\.'}',! iiJ.7 "..,., ... ii> t:n.~.;;
u.c' 'c.'.',,:,.,.')
7' Ct. ~ ~HGREGAE BASE T ~: 37(,0 6.:.[; 1128.36 ! )~,~. j~ 1128.36 .' :u.,. :~~
!N
S 2331 TYPE 31 BiT. ~~SE [DuRSE TN 1 ,:.~" ."- t' ~i .~0 I, 'Hi
",~JU i'f.J'J
92331 TjPE 4j BIT. ~ERR CuURSE TN 9~,Q ~l, \l;i ;),'X (i (i..(i(i
;() T ~c~ COAT BAt ~% l.U Ii U.iJl) l; u.DD
11 CDNC. CURB & 6UTTER P.6i& 'r 5 ;~ 2 (1 ~. I:; JJJ ;" {;{;:")
L, ,
12 f~ CuNC. Di~ RESTORATluN BY n~ 2LOO " V ,'i'.' (i,N;
n CuN8, BtiilING If 1:.(i ~, ~o (;, ~v " 0.('0
',I
14 2~ BIT, Diw RESTORATiuN BY 37(i H.OO ;' li~ ')0 0 ;; !-',..
i~ S[}nDn~S SY b~O(! 1.it) i! i; !\) .'; i}.(iv
i6 HDJljST MRNlmLES H 16 2M.QO i 2v'j,;j(: . 1.~j!J ,~N
Ii ~~J~ST C~TCH EASI~S U B 7(l,C(i {) o , (,(~ } O,{)(J
18 C~NSTRUCT CRTCH F.~SIN fA , 1200.0(' i2f!D,:JC' i2Di].;}}
,
J9 ;i" Mer CLASS 111 LF B !~" 00 B 6iYJ,{)!J B 6iN.tit}
20 RDJUST WATER VkLVES u, , 75,{)O u.uu (; t!.%
...71
21 STR~. SEW. REFt, CAST1N&S E~ i '}\iV,;J;j \! '.i, ~)j '.1 D.Ge.
22 SUEGRRllt STD. PRDCTOR r".' , B{i.~V (i 0.(10 '. i}.OD
~t:
23 Sl!BBf:AH Hif'L~n bEiiSITt EA i~ 35,iJO 'J ~). ~,() v. ~'G
24 CLASS ~ ~R~DA1ION H , fU.Ofr " 0.0(. Q 0.00
2~ CLASS) PRuCTUR r".' 1. 79.0u t: b.frD (\ {i,'i!",
"
11 CLASS 5 lNfLACE IENSIT! ,- 10 ~~,.(,O 0 ().'j(: , ij.O(,
-,
27 CONC. CilINIER iSE! OF 3) .. 1 7~.OO 0 ;. ;,;, " (),Di)
'" 'i.'J'.'
28 ,IT. EXTRACTION EA 6 ~o.oo (i O. o'~ n ~.Q(!
. 29 lIT. ,RAIATTON Efl 6 ~IC,.OQ " 0.% " Q.t1U
',f ,
30 lIT. CORES TN/lACE EA i 50.QO 0 ~.'J;J 0 iJ.00
31 lIT. NUCLEAR IE.SIT! fA n 30,O(i O. o . O~J j' O. ~D
,
~___M_________ -----~---------
T SC!E!,lE 1.0 STREET I1.PROVE!ENTS-.l.t,l $43 ~ ~.30 ,24 f43~ ~30.24
. ~ -~ -- --' ~~
nE~ CDNTRAn lTEr:2, THIS PEREiD f U! ~'L "! li~, t
---------+-----------------------~- ~-----------------~-------- --------------------~----~------------ -~-------------------------------------
~~G . [iES[:RH"T1O;~ ~~~" -;- tlt.jIT ,__..O"_'T" ~~;:'U~'T 'DTALiFERi(:ij \-;UU-liil' Moun TCi~;L: T~[!~TE
,." ; "dUf)~~; 1 ! l
PRlLE
----------------------------------- --------------------------- ----------~--------------------------- ---- -------- -------,-+---- ----------
&fHEDULE 2,} EXTRA ~uRX
---------------------~--------
RE[uNST, CATCH BASIN " 70(,\i() , "j~:U; ;,r. - ~; 'c' ':",: p"
-
2 RECuNFIGURE CATCH B~SIN "'.,;:.'l! ijjifi ;;r, : 1'. .:, ~';,
...
3 12" RCP CLASS III ~~! ~V,;Yi " ~\;~',:'i. iJ'J ,~. :, :-""i'
4 [;k~liT ~RNHOLf , 7:.,M n.l'\' ,.,"..
."
-------------- oo_____~ ~~_~_~
SCHEDDLE Z.O EtTRH ~QR~--TDt~_ '~'7" Tt_ {t' +',,;;,'.',--,.
__ -..-___-_.0.'_..-- -.--.-
. - - - ~ ~. ~51
~. < . --~ ';.-
'.' j ~ J',i." ~ ~
.
.
.
....-.....-.
:;")F:c;r-';:::: r::'T I Ui\: n...' ....._ ...... .."..... .....-...
L.f! iL... '.'i' "---. .f. :.,. , 'i"J' ;,
:~::;C:::H:::: "\;:; ,-. ..t.,,'..} .......,.......,......,.. _"..',m,m "'"... , ' , ... o!
;r",r::'" .!. :., i ~'-' i'" :.. ( !":'.!' '00 ",.' ....-. -. ,
:::; (::;).--i E: ::\..ii...E: ..:::" "'; i:.:.:-<. ;j",: ! ,iCli:::': ........Tc;;.. , r;,', "'i,
'TH:: ;..,. ;::'E::F~ 1 UD TC-, :'::;!... .---..- .
i L.! j)i~':'i i :::.
. n. ..... n,_. ..._. .,... h... ..._........... ..... ........_ ............... ..... "n. .._..... ...... ... .__... _, h.. .... _.~ ..... _.. . . ..." ......--_. .............--- ..-....-- ....... ........ ,
. (.,; r'ij U LJ l\i"r F (\ F< 1\) E::O .+ ~,:.:E J , ::::: (; ~.::.:; " ".: /l' :.'.~ ' , , .','."
-.-..................-...-".... .....:.. . ... ....-"..........................-... ..............................-......- ......._...-....-.-.-.....---.
Pi]''"'jC)LJF")-r F! :T(':) I ~\)E:D .'-'-'- ,-', .-..' .J,....,,;
.,.~. .:. , ~J (::) .' " .,._ :::) .'"
.....-......--...--.......-.............................................. .................-...._....
MATE:RIAL [)~i SITE: ';";'.' ".! d.. (}i
....-....................-................ ..............-......-.-........................
!.~'i{\.rE:F: I {'\L.. :DE:DtJL: r " .:~; \ } .. , '.' " "-. .....
.+.;! . '.,;
y ---" .
.-...........-......,..,................."................. ................,.-._,,--. . .."""",.. .....................................-...
PRE:VIOLJS PAYl1EhiTS :0*****************~ j;{',.. (}\'.
..........-.....-....-.....-...........................-.... ..................-.-.............-....... ...-.-.. .-. .........-...
rii'''iC!\.J\\l'T" r":o~ iF' + .q. E~ ~ :.:' :.;,. r;', " ".::' C '.i.: "!.F~" .-0 .:,. c.) .:::.)::::'
.,........,.........._....,___......'h._......_.._ ................. ..--.-...".....-......"...,.. ,--..- .--......--.....-................-.....- ...................-...
.
. -' - - --- - - - --- -- -- -- - - -- - - - - - --- - - ~ -- --- --'- ----- - -- -- --- ----- ------ ------- -.... -.. .--.- - - - - --
----------------------------------,-------------------------------------------------
" he-reby certif}' -th2.t all items 2nd 2.J?JDunts shown b..... this Day e~. tl m2. te are
cQ,n:?c1:. Tor the work cDmpleted to dit.te...
CONTPACTOR: , C .;;;c,~
~'. ~
-- ---- ---------
p7'E ;;~~
.",- , J7-
DATE, ;t!ff-iJ~1~~~-- J --------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------.-------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------_._-----
Based on the ENGHlEER' S on-si -re inspections as an experienced anD qualified
design professional and on review of application few payment and the accompanying
da ta. and schedules, the Er"~GINEER has detef:fflined~ tv the L . , j"ilS
u1?S1. OT
J.::.nowledge and belief~ that the quantities shown by this Estimate are COFr-ect.
.and that, he. sed on such inspections and n?'iiew-~ that the work has p.ogr-essed
to the point indicated ( subject tD an evaluatiDn oi such wot-k as "'-
functioning Pt-oj ect upon Substantial Completion !' to the result.s of any
subsequent tests reqlti red by the Cont...act DOCUffiEnts~ and to any qualificatiuns
. stated in his recommendation),! and that payment of the amount FECDlTJITlended is
is due Contractar(s}; but by n;lcommend ing an;'" pi''::iffien-t.,.. the ENGINEER will
nDt thE'rety be d eeme-d to 1.. _.__ r-eviewed the means.. methods!," sequen CE':!:-,-
IJct.....\::'
tt?chfIiQue5~ (n pr-CcE'ecures af cG:n~.truct.ion or s-2fety ~H-ecau tions Dr pr-Dy?"-aJI1S incident
incident theretD OF that the ENGIHEEP has made dny examination 'to ascerttiln
hDw Or- fot- whd.t purposE any Contrtic1:.oF has used the monies paid on aCCDun t
of the Contract Price.. Dr that ti tle to tiny of the wor"':,~ materials!," or
equipment has pa5~.ed to the Owner free and clear of any lein,- claims,-
security interests OF encumbFances~ OF that the Contractor(s) have comple-ted
their work exactly In accordancE" ~ith the Contract Documents.
El-JGHlEER, MAIER STEWART & ASSOCIATES, It.JC.
BY, ..~~........
TITLE:
-----~~~--~~~-------
DATE::: ______Z::.:f'..=2~_
---------,------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Approved by OwneF/Coffiffiission
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS BY,
------------------------------------
TITLE,
. ------------------------------------
DATE,
------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. CONSULTING ENGINEERS
Maier Stewart & Associates Inc.
July 9, 1992
File No: 520-019-30
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Arden Hills
1450 W. Highway 96
Arden Hills, MN 55112
RE: PAY ESTIMATE NO. 4
1991 NOIITH SNELLING AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
Dear Council Members:
Please find attached three copies of Pay Estimate #4, in the amount of $63,198.73 for the above
referenced project. This pay estimate represents final quantities for the entire project, as all
punchlist items were successfully completed this week. The final construction cost for this proj ect
was $230,237.91. The contract price, including the necessary change order for additional
. subgrade excavation work was $242,504. This [mal construction costs represents a reduction of
5. I % of the contract price. A fifth and final pay estimate will be processed to release the
retainage amount of $10,125.20 when the Contractor has submitted all necessary paperwork.
We will be submitting all necessary documentation to the Minnesota Department of Transportation
to close out the State Aid account for this proj ect.
We respectfully recommend payment of Pay Estimate #4, in the amount of $63, 198.73 to Midwest
Asphalt, Inc. for this project.
We will be in attendance at your July 13, 1992 City Council meeting to further discuss this matter.
Sincerely,
MAIER STEWART AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
/lf~4~
Mark J. Graham, P.E.
MJG/ks
enc.
019-0901.JUL
.
1959 SLOAN PLACE. SUITE 200. Sf PAUL, MINNESOTA 55117 612-774-6021
9800 SHElARD PARKWAY. SUITE 102, MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55441 612-546-0432 . Equal Opportunity Employer
. PARIIAl PAYMENl ESJIMAlf
------------------_.----
I A
FROM: 111li/91
10: 717191
CONIRACTOR: MIDiESI ASPNAlT. INC,
OiNER: CITY OF ARnfN NIllS
PROJEC1: 1991 NOm SNflUNO AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS i~2Hlil
commON DAlE AMOUNT OF CON1RACl
OR1OINAl: !DCAlfNDARDAlS ORIOINAl: Im.194.0D
REV1SEl: REVISED: 1237.294.00
ITEM : CONlRAE! I1m : INIS PERIOD , J01All0 DAlE
-----------------------------------:---------------------------:--------------------------------------:-----.---------.-----------------------
NO. DESCRIPJlON :UNI1 QUANlIlI um : QUANIITY MOUNl 10TAl/PERIOD :QUANllTI AMOUNT 101All1DlA1f
, PRICE : :
-----------------------------------:---------------------------;--------------------------------------:----------------.-----------.----------
SCHEDULE 1.0 STREEJ IMPROVEMENJS
------------------------------
1 REMOVE IIJUMINOUS PAVEMENI Sl 7100 0.90 0 0.00 181),J 8 7044.04
1 COMMON EXCAVAJION C1 5m 3.R5 0 0.00 mo .16 3341UD
3 SUIGRAIE P[REPARAJION RdSta 19 8b.00 0 0.00 lU8 IA75.01
. 4 AGGREGATE lASE CLASS 5 TN mo 5.00 4U3 m.15 719S,qA 39477.10
5 lASE COURSE MIX. JIPE 31 IN 1700 IUD 0 0.00 1\41.1 a 14674.18
, IEAR COURSE MIX. I1PE Al IN 1700 17.90 m3.a7 13!97.17 mU7 2Jb97.17
7 m. lAC! COAl GAL m l.10 sao ,3UO bl4.1l IIUA
I " CINC. DRIVEWAY APRON SI Sb ,UD 0 0.00 l1U5 118UD
9 l' m. DRIVEWAY APRON SI 300 UO 100.95 944.47 200.9~ 74U7
10 CONC. CUR8 & GUilER 1118 IF bOOO UO lOb,S IAOUD ,041.5 Im5.50
11 SODDING-tAiN ! IlVD. SI 7500 2.25 1111 SS97.1S WI 5m.1\
11 SEEDING AC O.l sm.oo 1.5 maUD 1.S mauD
13 ADJUSl MANNDlE EA 7 100.00 0 0.00 11 2100.00
14 RECONSlRUCJ MANHOLE lf U m.a5 0 0.00 u m.a4
15 ADJUSl iAJER VALVE EA 3 140.00 3 410.00 , 8AO.00
II HIIRANT EXJENSION tf 1.S 371.00 1 744.00 3.5 1301.00
17 RETAINING IAll Sf bOO 11.50 m.5 79bU5 m.5 79bD.75
IB RElDCAJE EX. MAllIOX fA , lUO 0 0.00 b IBO.OO
19 REMOVE EX. IARRICADE lS I 150.00 0 0,00 1 150.00
10 REMOVE EX. 11'm 1F 14 UO 0 0.00 AI 143.10
11 REIOVE EX. IS' m lF 3D UO 0 0.00 30 159 .00
11 SIGNING tS 1 I77s.o0 1 1775.00 1 1775.00
13 STRIPING tS 1 715.00 1 715.00 1 715.00
--.-.--------- ------.---.----
1 SCNEIUlE 1.0 SlREET IMPROVEMENTS--1,!.1 157,741.19 1101,0J1.91
SCHEIUtf 1.0 SJORM SEiER IMPRDVEMEN1S
----------------------------.-
. 1 II' RCP, CLASS III If lbO 1l.15 0 0.00 150 5311.50
1 14' RCP, CLASS III If 10 la.70 0 UO Ib m.l0
J 3D' RCP, CLASS lIT 1F 15 3l.90 O. 0.00 Ib 510.40
4 3,' X la.5' RCP, CLASS ITl 1F IS bUS D 0.00 Ib 1010.00
5 II' RCP FLARE I fNI SfCJION fA I Aao.DO D 0.00 I 4ao.oo
; 14' RCP FlARfl fNI SECTION EA I 040.00 1 040.00 1 040.00
. ,T[" [:[!fFRACT ITE~S THS f'EFIGl: T8TAL HiliRTE
"'L"
----- - -------- -------~-------------; ---------------------------. ---------------------- --_.._----~--,---- -.-------------------------------------
.__u_._.-.. .....-- ......---.. ~ ~UANTITY ~~D[:fr; TJT~L!?EPIOD :~liRNTITY ,,;;nnJ! laT.~L!Tujf:TE
". d:~;U:1,,'jlUN ;UN1! tH.i~N! I:r L' ~-j 1
iI,"i',
, , ,
.-.--------------------------------,---------------------------'--------------.-----------------------.------------------.------.-------------
7 27" CATCH BKSJ\ "-, , ~~'{f, '; ~ , ~i:",; ,'J-,'
8 ;18~ ~M~H[d " ~; ~,() . {i (: P()(~,O(.
,
f [:[!}iSTUCT ~+ ti,'i EX. 5EH\ ty !. ;,~ \;'\ ~v, f:~; {V, ;,i:;
~'" [:G}~N, TO EX, ST8~:~ ~H ,.", .. ,: :~ . 'J~' --,~ ,'c_
-------_..---- ---------------
SCHEDULE 2,0 STDR~ SE~ER 1~PRuVE~ENTS--T0til gq~).l:;) ~ j, -.d.,
SfHEDULE },O S~N1TAKY SE~ER ;~?Ruvf~ENTS
---~-_._---------~------------
l tDN1iECT 1[; U. S~Nnt;H ~;E~ER r:~ " .'\~!. D,) " 4}O,>i
, ""."
,., ,-," 8-10' DEE? jr lDB ..,. ,'0' ~4:,,3;,
" h'.!,' .
3 8; SE~ER PtUB E.i! ',-0; fjii .-" .,r,
- '.','h' ,iJ,'J-.'
4 4' SERVICE Pl?E ~i, i3 , & t~ , ~'. ',",' -;i, if,
" n. ' l -' ,~'V
-------------- -~-------------
T SC:iEI;JLE ~;,O SPET~F:Y SE~ER 11'iFRC~HErnS--TDt,,1 ~(r, tit! ~ 2 . 04 5. 9~,
SCHEDULE ~.O ~hTE~ ~~}N lR?RuvE~ENTS
----------------~-~~~~--------
j So TAPrJNS JEE E~. j ~,;i~; ,tH} \.' "''"; i ;i9 ~: . (~i}
2 1; ~ATER SERVICE CGNN. fA 110.00 ,} ",.., ~ j (!. DD
. 3 tl~ ~A TE~: ~RIN '-, 1 ~: 21.25 ,'".... E! '-!J.d.';;
~ l' iATE~: SER~iEE LF 1 :~ i.o.C.'J .j , i);! 1 ~. !:U!,('u
7' 8" ~~TD nUt; ,... 6 J. 9~! ')'" 6~', i)~
-------------- -----~--~------
" 5~HEDULE q,~ ~RjER ~RlN IftPRGVE~EN~S--TDt~l H~,(\i .;;'c -w
SCHU,tLE ~,(i CHA~J(;E {iF:EH ND.l
-----------------------~------
i 18' KC? FLA.RE~ END SEtlIUN tH 2 60~' ,;};j 'c,',",' 2 12V',O~'
2 27' CHTCH RASiN fA j 6n.!J-~i ,; ~'. 'J'.' i 69(iJ~i)
3 1~" Rn', CLASS l]i If u ~" .-,' ,','1'.' ~,4~, OC'
10 Ll.iJ H
4 1~' Ref fLARED END SECTIDN U j %iJ,'J') li ""," j 4BuJJ0
~ CLE~RINli HND GRUEBIN6 LS I O\iV.'J'J ~! v.'j'.; , 2:I(i{},QO
,
---------_.~-- ---.---.--.----
SCHDHE ~;,(l CHANGE tiRDER rKU--T[;t~l $,),{i(} ! 5 ~ 2 i i} . ;)i)
SCHEfrULE 6.0 EXTRA ~~k~
------------------------------
i RfEHJvE LA.TCH BASIN r.\ . S~~-~.% ~~,[u),;, i C-JV.Oli
;..~ ,
f q~ rvC DR~IN TILE LF 37J B.4(} 3!j ~,l:ij.n ~'l ;:, 7; j;7; ~{:
3 REJNSTALL FENCE LS 1 37~. UV .'f ~,;!ii . 3i~,,00
4 REPBIR cuNCRETE APRON SF 40 ~ os ~\i 1 ib, ~!,;, 40 19H.00
5 fOULEVAKf GRAD~Nf L5 1 i~,t,. 24 , l~lL14 1 2~;f. 2~
,
.h~_______~___ ---------------
j SCHEt'uLE b.O EXTRA tiDR~--Toiiil -$4 ~ 812 . 4 q f4~Hi2 .44
. -
H3~19B.n l230j237.91
,.,;
.
.
;::; ':;:'~:: ,:':..F c''':;,' (';i,.. /'"F":"-"'"
, '.'.,.'
;'.".,1.....,...,.......::... ...a.... ,:.,.'''':':.':':.' T i iF';::;~L} );;:::)-,)L: .,.. .. .-." - ,
,_.... '__.._.-n.' ;'.', ";"U; :;-.: ~;:;, :VJi::;'j::" r:....;i:'I:'. ,c'
.., .."..,,' ....a.... ':):
,...c............-.. ,."... '.::~ l.', :',,: "i "( ,.:'" ~:;
:.::"',: '1-. :'.;:;_. ::::. .j" i. :.._,: ,.:Ii " ,.,.,
::::;c:>n' DL.i!.. I';: [t.., () ",_,'__",... .,.. 'n' Ti"")F'! ..r') ,:),' j, ~;~; ':) " ,-:- ...-.
h'(i i 5:-- i..' i'''i(~ _c. !\! .~:. "'.L
~::~ i >ii::; () i__H. 1:::: !~: ...., C: H ('~; I\j c:' F:: c:~ F~ :C) F: H ~"-j ("'j ,. :t.., ;"H, ,~: .'1. >')(:-
" ..".... ,
~:::'!. .:: H !:_ D LJ; f:' (\" () C: ::< 'r F: (:; l,A! C) F.' 1" . '<'.'1 i.:.~ ';': ..:i.d. ",.., ,"...
, '''''Tic;) ':,:: ". ~ .,.. -.-.,
....", ,.' ..,...,.
, ...........-...." ............... .
.
..,,",. "", ;i!!.' 'Tefr, ::~. 'rC} r ;:.:,'j ':
. ,...~ .l, ::.,
Pi1'Y1CLi~",.i"r E:(jj""",,' ~' ,::~!{:';-, :::.. '\ ~::.:'H - ';"-."" .: i
P: i"i! U LJ f,.i -r f.:;: t:::'r (:'; J hi C J.:> .,,,.;.... ,,;,',,!
.",-.. ..........-...
r"l(~'rE:;::;; I P,t.. i')\\1 ~::; I 'rE. "'.'-. ...... ':x'.!
:"'.' ,.-.,
..-........-..-.-................................ .....-...-.....-....-.... , ................-........ .........,.... ...........---....
r....i{::.;.TEF<I {.~L.. :OCDLJC:T" .... , ..,. -.... ....
.... .-..
-;~."._,' .. '_.F-_.! ~_-' '..' ~ '" i'
__......._."" ....._........n...._'._.._..._.."....._... ................................... .. ............,.
PREVIOlJS PAYM;~NT~ :******************; .:t:..1 ;:j (.~ ., '.:;' .:;. :::: " i~;;' ~:~i
.. ,..... ..,.. .." . .,...... ....... ,_., .._~.._. ...... .....,._.... .... _._ .................._ .................. .._..... ..... ..m'_ ..... ......... ,_ __. . ..' ................... _.. ......_ ............ .'n' ........,.
(\1"iC1Ul\!'r IJL.lE ,';:;..:'. .1,:', _" .+/:; :::'" .' "';:0:" ,. ..;,-.,
;"C:;"..:'"..l.'.",:;,\" '
.........".. ..............................-....
.
>
- -...- ........ . =- J.L.l ...... t-.::: I "" ASSOC_ P_06
. .~=~~~~:=~~v~~===~~=~==~=~=~~====;====~~=~~:=;;=:;====~~~~~~~=_~~==:=~~=~:=~=~~~~
I h(,"eL}' c:er tify th.at ..11 items ~nd amounts shOwn by this par estimate are
correct for the work CQ$plcted to date.
CONTRACTOR: "'''::, ""~ t3, ~
~-- ---- --~--~-- -----~ ------
TI1lE~ V. P.. Co~-!ru.J1eJ'
~----------~--------~------ -------
DillE; --1:- <J ~9~
- ----..--------
~~~=~==~=~=:~=;:==~;=~===~=:=:~~==;~~~:~===~===~~=~=.~~=;====;=======;~~==~===:=
Ba~('d on the ENGINEER"S on-site inspec:tions as,an experienced and qualified
dcsiqn prQfe~sional and On reyie~ of application for payment and the accompanrinq
data and SChedules, the ENGINEER has detereined, to the best of his
knowl~dg<> and belief, that th~ Quantities shown br this esti.ate are COrrect
an<;! that. basc>d on such inSlledion~ ~nd roovi".., tholt the work "~s pro(!reSsed
to the pOint indicated (SUbject to ~n ~~aluation of such work as a
functioning Project upon Substantial Completion, to the results ot ~ny
~ub~equent t.,~ts required by the Contract Docu.ents. and to any qualifications
. st~tood in his reCOmm<>ndation), and that paYm~ot 01 the amount recomm.,nded ;5
is due Contractorls); ~ut by reco...ondinq any p~Y.ent. the ENGINEER will
n,,'t thcr~br be d"~~ed to have r~yiewcd the mean~. methods, sequences,
t~chniquoos, or proce~durcs Of construction or 54fetr precautions Or programs incident
inciden t thcreto or that the ENGINEER has mado ~T eX4~in<<tion to a~certain
how Or for what purpose any Contractor has used the monies paid On account
of tho Contract Price, or that title to any of the work, materials, or
<<quipm{'nt ha.s passed to the Owner free and Cle~r of any lein, Claims,
security int~rest$ or encumbr~nc~s. or that the Contractor(s) haYe co~pl~ted
th~ir wDrk e~a.ctlT in accordance ~ith th~ Contra.ct Docu~ents_
ENGlNE:ER~ ~~IER STE~ART & ASSOCIATES, INC.
"" --1t:J6:.&:~
TITLE: - 5.'
---- -~.__~.H'>"""'J , ____
PATE~ ---LZ::.z.?=__
=;=~==~=:==~~~~~~=~==~:======~~==~e~~=~;~e==~==.=====:~==~=-~~=~~:~~~=;~;:==A=;:=
Approved by Owner/Commissicn
BY~
CITY OF nRDEN HILLS ----------~--------._---------~~----
TITLE:
. -~---------------~-------~----------
nATE:
--~---._----------
=:~=~~~:~==~~======~~=~~~~~~~=~=;;~======:===~==~===:=~~=~~~=~~~~~~===~~~~,~~==~.~
J
CITY OF WDEN HILlS
. MEHIU\NOOM
IlM'E : JUly 9, 1992
TO: Mayor and city council
~:@7 Terry Post, Temporary city AcoouIltant
SUBJEX::T : Residential Rec:ycl~ Fee ordinance 1lmendment
Attached is a letter dated June 25, 1992, from City Attorney Filla
=ncerning a proposed Amendment to the Residential Recycling Fee
Ordinance .
RECC:tolMENDATION:
staff ccn=s with Mr. Filla'S =nclusions and reconunends adoption of
Ordinance No. 289 Relating to Residential Recycling Fees, which amends
Section 11-31 of Ordinance No. 287 I1Tqlosing a Residential Recycling Fee.
ACI'ION RIDUIRED:
. If Council ccn=s, they should make a motion under Consent to adopt
Ordinance No. 289 Relating to Residential Recycling Fees, which amends
Section 11-31 of Ordinance No. 287 I1Tqlosing a Residential Recycling Fee.
TP/ts
Attachments
.
--
WARREN E. PETERSON PETERSON, FRAM & BERGMAN tREAL PROPERTY LAW SPECIALIST
JEROME p, FILLA PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION *ALSO ADMITfED IN FLORIDA,
DA.~IEL WITT FRAM 300 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING ILLINOIS, WASHINGTON D.C.,
GLENN A. BERGMAN WISCONSIN
JOHN MICHAEL MILLER 50 EAST FIFTH STREET -
. OF COUNSEL
GARY W. BECKER' ST. PAUL. MINNESOTA 55101-1197 MELVIN J. SILVER
TI~IOTHY J, HASSETft -
MICHAEL T. OBERLE (612) 291.8955
FAX NO. (612) 228.1753
June 25, 1992
Catherine Iago
City Administrator
City of Arden Hills
1450 West Highway 96
Arden Hills, MN 55112
RE: Residential Recycling Fee
Proposed Ordinance Amendment
Our File No.: 10450/900002
Cathy:
It has come to my attention that I may have incorrectly
drafted a portion of the Ordinance which was recently adopted by
the City relating to the Residential Recycling Fee. The Ordinance
as originally prepared and as adopted includes a statement which
seems to prohibit the City's reCYCling contractor from bidding on
contracts to collect recyclable materials from multiple family
dwellings or from the manufactured home park. This was not my
. intent. I am not sure if it was the intent of the City Council.
I am enClosing a proposed amendment to the Ordinance which
would correct the error by eliminating the last portion of the
second sentence of Section 11-3l. Prior to this proposed
amendment, that sentence read as follows:
The owners of multiple family dwellings and the owner of the
manufactured home park may be exempt from such fee upon
furnishing proof, in a manner satisfactory to the City
Administrator, that such owners have contracted for a
collection of recyclable materials by a collector other than
the City designated collector.
If the City's designated collector is also the contractor for
the collection of recyclable materials from multiple family
dwellings and/or from the manufactured home park, we should ensure
that there are sufficient reporting procedures to enable the City
to verify that the tonnage collected from multiple family dwellings
and/or from the manufactured home park are not included in the
tonnage slip submitted to the City for reimbursement pursuant to
the City's contract. If you have any questions, please contact me.
/V6];,\ truly yours,
/ ,
/ /1- - --'flbt-c-
. JPF:bap ( C "or?_ FiUo
"'--
enc.
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
ORDINANCE NO. 289
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO RESIDENTIAL RECYCLING FEES.
The Arden Hills City Council hereby ordains that Article IV,
Sections 11-31 of the Arden Hills City Code is hereby amended to
read as follows:
IV. Residential Recycling Service Fee.
11-31. Imposition of Fee. Except as herein provided, a
residential recycling service fee is hereby imposed on the owners
of all residentially occupied property within the City. The owners
of multiple family dwellings and the owner of the manufactured home
park may be exempt from such fee upon furnishing proof, in a manner
satisfactory to the City Administrator, that such owners have
contracted for the collection of recyclable materials. Proof of
such alternate service shall be submitted no later than July 15,
1992, and shall indicate that a contract has been entered into for
the succeeding calendar year. The total number of residential
dwelling units less the total number of exempt residential dwelling
units, shall hereinafter be referred to as the total number of
assessable residential dwelling units.
. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective on
.
Adoption Date. Passed by the City Council of the City of Arden
Hills the 13th day of July 1992.
,
Thomas Sather, Mayor
ATTEST:
Catherine Iago, Acting Clerk
Publication Date. Published on the of , 1992.
b\ord\AHORDll.
6/4/92
. 1
\
. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
MEMaU\NOOM
Dl\TE: JUly 10, 1992
TO: Mayor and City Council
FRCH: Tary Shields, Mmin. secretary/(})
stJBJECT: Continuation of Keithson Pond Assessment Hearing
Attached is a letter dated July 8, 1992, fram Engineer Gr'aham regarding
the continued Keithson Pond Assessment Hearing.
Engineer Gr'aham will be present at the meeting to answer any questions
or concerns you nay have.
Attachment
.
:j
. f'
~
I:
-f!
. rI/,I~.-:J CONSULTING ENGINEERS
Maier Stewart & Associates Inc.
MEMO W: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: MARK GRAHAM, M.S.A. ;1!v
RE: KEITHSON POND ASSESSMENT HEARING
DATE: JULY 8, 1992
FILE: 520-029-20
As you know, the agenda for the July 13, 1992 City Council meeting includes the continuation of
the assessment hearing for the Keithson Pond Drainage Improvements.
Following the June 8, 1992 Council meeting, City Council members Malone and Hicks met with
the former City engineering firm to discuss this project.
The former engineer has indicated that the original intent for the pond was to provide an overflow
outlet through a drainage swale and baffled weir located west of the pond on property owned by
. Mr. George Reiling. However, the pond was never properly graded, the drainage swale was not
improved, the baffled weir was not constructed and no easement was obtained over the Reiling
property.
While this natural drainage swale exists, it would be necessary to further excavate it to ensure that
the Keithson Pond has an outlet. Excavation in the pond and drainage swale would consist of
grading the pond from its present elevation of approximately 972.0 to establish an elevation of
969.0 to 969.5, excavation of the swale to provide positive drainage towards the southwest across
Mr. Reiling's property and construction of a baffled weir, with a top elevation of 970.5, to meet
Rice Creek Watershed District requirements.
The first floor elevation of the home on the north side of the pond, owned by Mr. Mark Magers,
is approximately 975.4, which is 4.9 feet above the top of the baffled weir. The next property to
the north, owned by Mr. Dick Foster, has a backyard elevation of approximately 970.0 to 972.0
and a fust floor elevation of approximately 981.0. It would be necessary to place fill to a
minimum elevation of 973.0 on Mr. Foster's property to eliminate the ponding on his property.
This fill would be generated from excavation of the existing pond.
File records and correspondence indicate that this grading work within the pond and drainage
swale was the original intent of the project. There is no record, however, of a formal easement
across Mr. Reiling's property to utilize this swale.
.
1959 SLOAN PLACE. SUITE 200. ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55117 612.774.6021
9800 SHElARD PARKWAY. SUITE 102. MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55441 612-546-0432 . Equal Opportunily Employer
.
. KEITHSON POND ASSESSMENT HEARING
JULY 8, 1992
PAGE TWO
Given the number of written and verbal comments from the June 8th assessment hearing, the City
Council may consider reducing the scope of the project to grading, construction of a baffled weir,
placement of approximately 16 feet of 15" RCP to fInish the storm sewer outlet from Keithson
Drive, tree removal and a limited amount of rip-rap. The estimated construction cost for this
work, based on bid prices from the low bid received in April, would be $8,000 to $13,000. These
costs do not include any monies for easement acquisition that may be necessary from Mr. Reiling.
The City has presently awarded the Keithson Pond Storm Sewer Improvements Project to
Machtemes Construction Co., Inc. This award was contingent on obtaining the neces~
easements from Mr. Reiling. Should the City choose to substantially reduce the scope 0 the
project, it would be necessary to have the City Attorney advise us on negotiating a change order.
Machtemes Construction Co., Inc. may have also ineurred some costs on the award of this project
which would also have to be discussed.
We will be present at the July 13, 1992 City Council meeting to further discuss this matter.
MJG/ks
. 029-0801.JUL
.
~
~ ~ '..-...
.. STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
ORDINANCE NO. 288
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A CITYWIDE DEVELOPMENT MORATORIUM.
The Arden Hills City Council ordains that Section XIV(B) is hereby
added to Appendix A of the Arden Hills City Code to read as
follows:
Section B. Citywide Development Moratorium
1. The City of Arden Hills is conducting studies and will
hold public hearings for the purpose of considering
comprehensive amendments to its zoning regulations.
2. Pending the completion of public hearings and the
adoption of amendments to its zoning regulations, the
Arden Hills City Council has determined that it would be
in the public's interest to impose a Development
Moratorium on all property within the City of Arden
Hills.
. 3. There is hereby imposed a Development Moratorium pursuant
to the revisions of MS 462.355, Subd. 4, on all property
within the City of Arden Hills. During the period of the
Moratorium, the development of property shall be
restricted as follows:
a. property shall not be subdivided.
b. new structures shall not be constructed on
property.
c. building additions to existing structures and
expansions of existing uses on property shall not
be allowed unless the addition or expansion is in
compliance with the proposed amendments to the
City's zoning regulations as determined by the City
Council.
d. a construction activity within an existing
structure, which would not otherwise require City
Council review, will be allowed provided that such
improvements are undertaken in compliance with the
current zoning regulations and the proposed
amendments thereto.
4. The Development Moratorium shall commence on the day
., following the publication of this Ordinance and shall
1
T-
.-
~
~ continue until day of , 1993, or
until the Arden Hills City Council takes further action
to alter the term of the Development Moratorium as it
relates to specific development proposals or parcels,
whichever event occurs first.
Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective on
.
Adoption Date. Passed by the City Council of the City of Arden
Hills the 13th day of July , 1992.
Thomas Sather, Mayor
'ATTEST:
Catherine Iago, City Administrator
. Publication Date. Published on the of , 1992.
b\ord\AHQRDIO
6(12(92
.
2
f .
MINllTES
CITY OF THE ARDEN HILLS, M:INNESC:1m
PLANNIN3 a:t4MISSICIl' MEE'l'IN3
WEDNESDl\.Y, JULY 1, 1992
. 7:30 P.M. - CITY HALL
ClUL TO ClU)ER
Note that the Commission met at 6:30 p.m. to discuss Zoning ordinance
Revisions until 7:30 p.m.
Chair Probst called the meeting tc order at 7:30 p.m.
ROLL ClUL
Present: Chair Dennis Probst, Members Dave Carlson, Barbara piotrowski,
Jeanne Winiecki, Raymond McGraw. Absent: Members steve Erickson, Scott
Petersen and Council Liaison Thomas Mahowald. Also present: Planner
John Berg1y, Acting Clerk Administratcr Catherine Iago, Building
Official Dave Kriesel, and Recording Secretary Tery Shields.
APPROYE MINllTES
Winiecki noted on Page 9, Case #92-08, Variance for D1ugosc:hj the
address should read, 1482 Arden View Drive.
McGraw moved, seconded by winiecki, to approve the Revised June 3, 1992,
Planning Minutes. All voted in favor. (5-0)
. PUBLIC HEroUN:; - DEVEIill'MENT MORA'lUUUM
Chair Probst opened the public hearing at 7:35 p.m., Development
Moratorium.
Acting Clerk Administrator Catherine Iago confinned the publication of
the Notice of Hearing in the New Bricmtcn Bulletin on Wednesday, June
24.
Chair Probst explained the Commission is in the process of reviewing and
proposing amendments to the Zoning Ordinance and that the Commission
recammends tc Council a moratorium be placed.
Chair Probst asked if there was anyone present to speak in favor of or
opposed to this matter.
Mr. Mike Nordstrom, Grand Met (Alpo Pet Foods), asked if the moratorium
would affect his proposed subdivision and expressed his concerns of
selling the property tc perspective J:uyers who wish tc develop it at the
same t:i1ne the moratorium is in place.
Bergly explained the moratorium would not be effective until the Council
takes action at the July 13 Council meeting.
Member winiecki stated any development that would comply with the new
. ordinance would be acceptable.
Chair Probst asked if there were any other questions or comments.
Hearing no response, the public hearing was closed at 7:38 p.m.
---------
~ ~
planning ccmnission Meeting 2 7-01-92
PUBLIC HEroUN; - DEVEWPMENl' MORA'l'ORItlM (<::.'an'INllED1
Member Dave Carlson expressed his support of the moratorium for a period .
of 6 months instead of one year.
'!here was discussion of the length and contents of the moratorium and
what is most beneficial to the public and the City.
winiecki moved, Mo3raw seconded, to recommend to Council to
proceed with the moratorium for a period of one year. (winiecki,
piotrowski, Probst, Mo3raw voting in favor; Carlson opposed) . (4-1)
PUBLIC HEroUN; - C1lSE #92-06: SUP 1\MENI:MENl' WITH VARIANCES. 1306 W. CO. ROllD
E. AMJCO OIL <XJoIPANY
winiecki moved, seconded by piotrowski to reconsider Case
#92-06, SUP l\mendment with Variances, 1306 W. Co. Road E, Amoco oil
Corrpany. Motion carried unaniInous1y. (5-0) .
Chair Probst opened the public hearing at 7:49 p.m.; Case #92-06, SUP
l\mendment with Variances, 1306 W. Co. Road E, Amoco oil Corrpany.
Acting Clerk Administrator Catherine Iago confinned the publication of
the Notice of Hearing in the New BriClhton Bulletin and mailed to
affected property owners on Wednesday, June 24.
Planner Berg1y referred to his report dated 7-01-92, and explained the
Amoco request was thoroughly discussed at the June 3 Planning Commission .
meeting . Options discussed were for a car wash location to the rear and
west end of the building, and a proposal for the east er.1. 'Ihe
Applicant requested approval or denial of the application as suhnitted
without considering the options. Action to deny the request was to be
sent to the Council. 'Ihe Applicant suhnitted a request that the Case be
pulled from the Council agenda to provide additional time to view an
optional plan.
'!he Planner reviewed the findings listed in his report and stated since
the June meeting, the Applicant, the Architect, Chairman Probst and the
Planner have reviewed a revised scheme that addresses most of the
concerns of the Planning Commission. The key issues discussed were:
1. Intensitv: 'IWo setback variances were requested to squeeze the
building, drives and parking onto an already heavily used site.
Response : '!he revised Plan has the new building to the southwest
of the existing station; the traffic pattern proceeds clockwise
around the rear of the station, into the carwash and exits on the
west drive that connects the restaurant to County Road E. 'Ihe
drive and building are depressed approxilllately 3 feet creating a
lower profile building situated to the rear of the site.
2. Conoestion: Traffic circulating to and from the carwash cut
directly through the already congested site.
Response: 'Ihe new Plan brings all carwash traffic around the
south and west ends of the site - existing from the west drive .
directly to County Road E.
-----
.
Planning n.,.,,;"'sion Meetin;J 3 7-01-92
~E #92-06 (CONT'DI
. 3. parkina: Some spaces were actually removed from the building area
and relocated on the very west e::lge of the site - west of the
restaurant access drive. Space on the east end of the restaurant
site were questioned on the basis of the restaurant requirements.
Response: Parking has been consolidated (12 spaces) just west of
the existing building by the relocation of the west drive. Five
spaces will remain on the east edge of the property. A handicap
space and the 5 other nearest spaces will be reserved for customer
parking . The Applicant irwestigated the restaurant parking and
found that it seats 150; with 1 space for each 3 seats, 50 spaces
are required and 72 are available. Amoco leases the 22 extra
spaces on the east end. The Plan indicates 20 spaces on-site (one
is used for a tenp::>rary remediation building) plus the 22 on the
restaurant site.
4. Trash Enclosure: Was located in the front yard between the
parking and County Road E.
Response : Relocated to the east side, behind the 5 parking
spaces . The enclosure will be finished the same as the principal
building and will have doors to corrp1etely enclose the structure.
5. Scr'eenina on SE Corner: Concern was expressed regarding
headlights shining into the adjoining doctor's office.
Response: The reversed traffic pattern minimizes this problem,
but, a 5-foot screen fence softened with landscaping, is also
proposed to further separate the service station and its
associated traffic from the quieter office use. The fence will
. extend from the trash enclosure to the SE corner of the site.
6. Temporarv Remediation structure and Prapane Disoensina: These
uses had been proposed over the last several months but were never
officially brought forward for action. The city wanted to know
the status of these and the :i1rq:lact on the site Plan.
Response: The temporary Sll'all (10 x 20') building has been
located in the southwest parking stall west of the main building.
Atterrpts were made to locate it behind the building, but the
location and elevation of the water collection trenches precluded
that possibility. When it is removed, one more parking space will
be available. Amoco does not allow propane dispensing at their
stations.
7. Siqnaqe: The total signage area and the area of individual signs
had not been determined at the t:iJne of the initial Planning
Commission review in June. Signage added f= the car wash would
have to be calculated.
Response: Besides the normal b.1siness signs, service stations are
allowed signs showing gasoline prices and car wash facilities with
an area not to exceed 12 sq. ft. each. The area of these signs is
to be included in the maximum permitted area. Business wall signs
are limited to 10 percent of the building facade. staff's
interpretation is that other directional or informational signs
are not included in the prescr-ibed total b.1siness sign. As the
lot is a corner lot, the sign area could be 10 percent of the
. County Road E facade and 10 percent of the Hamline facade. The
Planner reviewed the calculations of the wall mounted sign as
outlined in his report of 7-01-92.
--.-,-.-- -
.
planning camdssion Meeting 4 7-01-92
~E #92-06 lCONT'DI
8. storm and Sani tarv Sewer: There was a dis=epancy between the .
Architect's proposal and the City Engineer's understan::ling of
Metropolitan and state requirements and permits.
Response :
a. A heated slab on the entry side of the car wash will be
drained via storm sewer to the Hamline Avenue ditch just
west of the site.
b. A heated slab on the exit side will extend from the car wash
and west a=oss the restaurant drive. This is to avoid the
ice hlild up from dripping cars and will drain into the
ditch to the west.
c. carwash water will be drained directly into the sanitary
sewer . A permit from the MWCC may be required.
9. OVerall APPearance: As initially proposed, the carwash would have
its exit door facing County Road E.
Response: 'lhe revised Plan provides an unbroken brick facia, with
a 30-inch facia band around the top and 8 junipers along the wall.
Being depressed aIxlut 3 feet presents a lower profile to the
County Road E. view.
Planner Berg1y concluded that he and Chairman Probst have been working
with the Applicant and Architect on a day-tCM'lay basis to arrive at a
solution that meets the city standards and address circulation,
appearance, landscaping, perceived intensity (and orderliness),
proximity to parking, etc. Bergly stated that he and Chairman Probst .
support the revised Plan and reconnnended approval.
Bergly rep:>rted in light of all the service stations that have
eliminated the service aspect in fav= of more gasoline sales and the
retail sale of food products, felt uncomfortable aIxlut being overly
restrictive for an operation that is successful and provides service to
residents in Arden Hills. The proposal does not require any variances
and has a plan that successfully addresses the concerns of the Planning
Commission. Bergly reconnnended 10 conditions which should be attached
to the Amended Special Use Pennit:
r' A landscape bond be delivered to the city prior to issuance of the
Building Pennit.
2. All permits necessary from the Metrop:>litan Waste Control
Commission, Pollution Control Agency, and any other required
I 3. permitting agencies be secured with copies delivered to the City
prior to issuance of a Building Permit.
The City Engineer approve the site drainage plan.
4. The proposed temporary remediation building be allowed to be
} constructed after staff review of plans and details.
5. The access easement document along the west area of the site
providing access to the restaurant be approved by the city
Attorney, as the restaurant does not have direct access to a
public street.
6. 'lhe parking agreement between the restaurant and Amoco be filed
with the SUP as this parking is neces~ meet the par:z, .
. requirements of the stations. .;() t' ".(. ~:t V-
WJ'1'<l su.p ,,4..oJ. ( ~ -
- ~~~-.-
Planning Calmi.ssion Meeting 5 7-01-92
~ #92-06 (OONr'D)
. 7. Employees and other long-term parkers be required to park in the
leased restaurant parking lot, and that no parking of damaged
vehicles, unlicensed vehicles of inoperable vehicles be allowed in
this lot beyond a 24-hour period.
8. The station operators control the queue to the carwash on the
station site and that no such queue be allowed in public streets.
9. That the station operators protect the traffic safety on County
Road E fram hazardous conditions resulting from water dripping
from cars leaving the carwash.
10. That the trash enclosure doors be shut at all tiroes except when
loacpng or unloading trash.
,(, - ~(.- f-.~ l' ted 11 part' . led t te 't'
Wrn~ ~ conp llIleI1 a ~es ll1VO v 0 =ea a pos~ ~ve
option that satisfies the concerns of the Commission and Amoco oil
Corrq:lany.
Chair: Probst asked if there were any other questions or camments.
Hearing no response, the public hearing was closed at 7:55 p.m.
Acting Clerk Administrator Iago stated Attorney Filla had two issues to
be addressed: proof of the lease for parking, and title for the
property. She also stated Attorney Filla would like to view the
documents prior to the July 13 Council meeting.
. Ted Brauson, OWner of the Amoco station and the Architect, Harry
Schroeder, stated they would conply with the request of Attorney Filla.
if- piotrowski questioned the Applicant how thee,Will be controlled to
avoid traffic congestion on County Road E.
~ 1/ Mr. Schroeder stated in the event traffic appears to backup, the
Attendant will advise the driver to return at a later date and issue a
~-- raincheck ticket which is valid up to seven days.
Chair Probst asked if there were any questions or comments from the
floor.
winiecki moved, seconded by Carlson that Commission
reconunend to Council approval of Case #92-06, SUP with Variances, 1306
W. Co. Road, E, Amoco oil Cclrrpany, the plans dated July 1, 1992, with
the 10 conditions listed in the Planners recarmnendation and the 11th
condition to show proof of lease for parking and title for the property
to the Attorney prior to July 13 Council meeting. Motion =ied
unanimously. (5-0)
alSE #92-12: MIN:JR SUBDIVIBIClN/rm SPLIT. 4251 FERNiiOOD AVENUE N:lRTH. ALPO PET
FOCIJS (MIRE NElS'l'RCH. GR1lND MET)
Planner Bergly reviewed his report of July 1, 1992, relating to Minor
SUbdivision/Lot Split at the Alpo Site, 4251 Fernwood Avenue North, Alpo
Pet Foods (Mike Nordstrom, Grand Met) .
. Bergly explained that the Applicant proposes to divide a 14.88 a=e
tract into two parcels. Both parcels have frcntage only on Fernwood
Avenue on the east and back onto a City Trail. Parcel A contains the
Alpo Pet Food operation and Parcel B is vacant.
---...-
~------ ----.-
planning Ccmnission Meeting 6 7-01-92
ClISE #92-12 (CXlNl"DI
The Planner reviewed the findings listed in his report and stated the .
proposed division would be necessary to facilitate the sale of the
property . To date, the future owner has not been determined. He
reported the existing development on Parcel is setback from the proposed
dividing line more than the minimums required. The SUl:di vision
Ordinance allows park dedication for Cammercial/Industrial development
up to a maximum of 10 percent. If this division were to be treated as
most residential sub::livisions are, only that portion of the total area
not already developed would be used to calculate park dedication
requirements .
In this case, Parcel B containing 8.15 a=es would be used to determine
the amount of park dedication. If the Park & Recreation Commission and
Council determine that dedication of land is appropriate, Bergly
suggested consideration of land west of the large wetland and adjoining
the present trail easement. This area is heavily wooded, has steep
slopes and is remote and probably not usable for buildings or parking.
Bergly explained that in the year-end "UndevelOped Land" report, this
unused portion of the Alpo site is shown as a site f= potential
industrial development and anticipate the division and development
likely to follow. He stated the south property line indicates a slight
dis=epancy between the written legal description and the locations of
existing lot corner monuments. On the north edge of the total property,
the 1/2 section plat indicates a separate 110 foot wide parcel - this .
separate parcel was not included in the legal description given to the
surveyors. Both of these matters will be resolved in the final
documents that will be filed with the County.
Planner Bergly concluded to J;'econnnend approval with the following
conditions:
1. The final documents to be filed address the two issues discussed
in the above paragraph.
2. The park dedication requirements be determined and either
3. dedicated along with the division or paid prio~~J.~oo ~
The city Engineer determine if any additional 1 are
required.
4. The owner is aware that special permits may be required for any
changes to or w=k around the wetlands.
5. The debris and the junked appliance on the site be removed.
6. The city Attorney approve the final lot division documents prior
to filing. ~
1. O~~
Chair Probs ed if there were any questions or comments from the
floor.
There was discussion regarding park dedication of the property.
Winiecki moved, seconded by McGraw that Conunission recammend
to Council approval of Case #92-12i Minor SUl:division/Lot Split, 4251 .
Fernwocxi Avenue North, Alpo Pet Foods (Mike Nordstrom, Gl:'ant Met) with
the 6 conditions listed in Planner Berg1y's report with the 7th
condition to show proof of the title and abstract of the property to the
city Attorney . Motion carried unanilnously. (5-0)
-
. .
Plannillg n.....; "sion Meeting 7 7-01-92
DISCUSSION: 0l'HER PU.NNIN:; ISSUES
. NORlliWESTERN UlILEGE: Connnission discussed the June 2, 1992, letter
received from F. Gene KOrdick, Administrative Vice President,
Northwestern COlle;Je, re;Jarding waterfront activities. It was
determined f= Acting Clerk Administrator Iago to respond to Gene
Kordick I s letter and state they are in violation of the zoning code and
request a meeting be scheduled with Dr. Donald Ericksen, Planner Bergly,
and Acting Clerk Administrator Iaga.
CITY HALL STUDY: Chair Proffit informed the Connnission of the status of
the City Hall and Public Works facilities construction.
DENNIS FOSI'ER. WHAT-A-RAUlUEr sroRrS CLUB: Discussion was held on the
status of the site Plan Review, Case #92-09
Carlson moved, seconded by winiecki to convey the
Commission I s general concerns to the Council that it appears to set a
precedence using financial hardship as a basis f= extension. ~offit,
piotrowski, winiecki, Carlson voting in favor; McGraw abstain 4-0-1)
~ REPORT
Acting Clerk Administrat= Iago reported on items of interest to the
Connnission.
. cctn'INlJED DISCUSSION: ZONING ClRDINAN::E REVISIONS
The Connnission continued discussion on Zoning Ordinance Revisions
between 8:40 p.m. and 9:30 p.m.
ADJOURN
Mo3raw moved, seconded by winiecki to adjourn at 9:40 p.m.
Chair Dennis Proffit
.
,~ ~
PARKING AGREEMENT
. This Agreement is made this day of , 1992,
by and among Peter Ngo and Ich Hoang (collectively, the "Lan(i1ord")
and Theodore S. Brausen (the "Tenant").
RECITALS
1. Landlord is the owner of the real property in Ramsey
County, Minnesota, located at 1310 West County Road E in the city
of' Arden Hills, Minnesota, containing the Great Lake Restaurant,
and shown on Exhibit A attached hereto (the "Restaurant Property") .
2. Tenant is the owner of the Amoco filling station located
at 1306 West County Road E, Arden Hills, Minnesota, immediately
adjacent to the Restaurant Property on the north (the "Amoco
Property") .
3. Landlord and Tenant would like to memorialize their
agreement regarding the leasing of twenty (20) parking spaces on
the Restaurant Property.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises set
forth herein and other good and valuable consideration, the parties
hereby agree as follows:
. 1. Lease of parkinq Space. Landlord hereby leases to Tenant
for the term and upon the conditions herein provided, the twenty
(20) open-air, surface parking spaces shown cross-hatched on the
attached Exhibit A (the "Parking Area").
2. Rental. Tenant agrees to pay Landlord as rent, in
advance, on or before the first day of each month during the term
of this Lease, without demand, $150.00, commencing August 1, 1992.
3. Access to Parkinq Area. Tenant, its agents, employees
and licensee shall have the right to use the accesses and private
driveways on the Restaurant Property for vehicle and pedestrian
access to and from the Parking Area.
4. Term. The term of this Agreement shall commence August
1, 1992 and shall terminate July 31, 1994. Upon expiration of the
term, this Agreement shall continue on a month-to-month basis, and
either party may thereafter terminate this Agreement upon thirty
(30) days' written notice.
5. Use of parkinq Spaces. Tenant agrees to use the Parking
Area solely for parking for employees and for cars being serviced
at the Amoco station located on the Amoco Property. Tenant agrees
not to use or occupy any portion of the parking area for any
unlawful purpose.
. 6. Insurance. Tenant agrees to maintain liability insurance
covering its activities in the Parking Area in the amount of at
least $500,000 combined single limit coverage.
..
7. Miscellaneous. This Agreement sets forth the entire
. agreement between the parties and supersedes all prior
negotiations, discussions, representations, understandings and
agreements between the parties with regard to its contents. This
Agreement may be amended only by the written agreement of all the
parties hereto. This Agreement shall be governed by Minnesota law.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement
as of the date first set forth above.
Peter Ngo
Ich Hoang
Theodore S. Brausen
.
This Instrument Drafted By:
Leonard, Street and Deinard (SCM)
150 South Fifth Street, Suite 2300
Minneapolis, MN 55402
.
scm\amoco\parking.agt 2
,
.
.
0
-< ;;0
l'l 0 m
-< tJ)
7' )> -l
m r >
." ;;0
," ~ >
ll:! " c
~ :z:
-l
(f) .."
."
)> >
hl ;;0
'"
tJJ -
I ~ :z:
(;)
Cl ~
-
>
(;)
;;0 ;l!
> ~
. 3:
"
-<
~
w~~ ~ 8
"m'"
m "-
UJ-Oz
;<$;O ~ ~
~~~
)>~o
z _ ."
-<tJJZ
.,,)> @
fflf;~
)>mm ~
uJ,,;o e
om
",0
c
m;;;
)>m
Q>ll
.
.
CITY OF 1\RDEN HILLS
. ME2OANOOM
DATE: JUly 10, 1992
"''' @ -. "" city """"""
Ji'Rrn: l~.r Terry Post, Temporary City Acoo1mtant
SUBJD::T: Revised Interim Use ~eement, What-A-Racquet SpOrts Club
As directed by Council at the Jtme 15, 1992 Worksession meeting, city
Attorney Filla has reviewed and made necessary changes to the Interim
Use Agreement for the proposed What-A--Racquet Sports Club by Developer
Dermis Foster. Mr. Filla's July 9, 1992, oo=espondence to Mr. Foster's
Attorney, Mr. Balyk, is attached.
Attorney Filla will be present and available for questions and comments
as Council discusses this unfinished agenda item.
TRP Its
Attachments
.
.
SENT BY:PETERSON FRAM BERGMAN 7- 8-82 : 4:06PM :PETERSON FRAM BERGMA~ ;# 2/ 5
WARREN E. mnmSON PETERSON, FRAM & BERGMAN tREALl'ltnj'1!RTr LAWSI'I((:IAI,IST
JJ:!;kOMR 1"'. FIT.T.A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION "A.LSO AVrdlT 1'I::;V IN FLORIDA..
. u.\Nt~L ,,"'lIT fRA~ ~\OO Mill\VEST F'EDERA1. Tltm,TlTNG ILLINmS, \\,A$HIl\:(;HJN I).C.,
GU';l\N A. H~:WG)l.1AN WnH__UN~JN
JOHN MICH......EL MILLER ,;;U EI~'J I'U'ru STlU:~T -
GAH."t' W. J\I\.Ck"'F:R. SI: PAUL, MJNNllSOl'A SSl{)l-l1!17 OF COllNSl::L
TIM(YJ'lTY J. IIA,'\.."irnTi MKI.\lIN ,1_ SrLYI~W:
i\fff:TTAET, T. OnERLE -
(ti12)2I).MI9S5
t.:"'-" NO. 1.6l1) 22R.1?5;\
JUly 9, 1992
Tom Ba1yk
Ba1yk and Wiseman
5 East County Road B
St. Paul, MN 55117
BY FACSIMILE
AND U.S.-MAIL
RE: What-A-Racquet Sports Club
Your File No.: 90-131. 004
Our File No.: 10460/900004
Tom:
Enclosed is a revision to the Interim Use Agreement for the
ebove-captioned matter which includes the Reci.tals. I have also
. restructured the Terms and. Conditions contained in Sections 3(A)1
through 3(A)6. However, the content of those sections remain the
same. In addition, I have inserted a requirement in Section 3(D}
that the data submitted be in a form acceptable to the City.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Very..truly yours,
~ ~)
.-t ;;: ~~
(' - J'e;o 'P. <-
Filla
JPF:bap
eno.
co: Terry Shields
.
SENT BY:PETERSON FRAM BERGMAN; 7- 8-82 ; 4:06PM :PETERSON FRAM BERGMA~ ;# 3/ 5
.
AN INTERIM USE AGREEMENT
(1) PARTIES. This Agreement is entered into by and between the
City of Arden Hills, a municipal corporation and political
subdivision of the State of Minnesota (herein "City"); and Dennis
Foster, his successors and assigns (herein "Developer").
(2) RECITALS.
A. The Developer has proposed to construct a tennis facility
pursuant to approved plans and specifications on certain
property (herein "Project") looated within the Ci ty of
Arden Hills. Construction of the Project was authorized
by the City Council on December lO, 1990. Construction
of the projeot did not occur during 1991 and the City has
asserted its approval of the Projeot expired on December
lO, 1991. In addition, the City is considering the
imposition of a Development Moratorium pending adoption
of comprehensive zoning code changes, some of which, may
impact the Developer's Project.
B. Developer claims that the original approval remains
effeotive and/or that subsequent aotions by the City or
. its staff have reasonably led developer to conolude that
a re-app1ioation is all that would be required in order
to obtain the appropriate building permits for the
project. Developer further asserts that it was not
advised of the proposed Development MoratoriuIll and that
it has incurred substantial costs toward the financing
and oonstruction of the Project in reliance upon City
action.
C. The City and the Developer wish to resolve any disputes
relating to the construction of the Project without the
cost and delay of litigation. The City is willing to
allow an interim use of the Developer's property for the
Project pursuant to the terms of this Agreement.
(3) TERMS AND CONDITIONS. In consideration of the mutual
undertakings herein expressed, the City and Developer agree as
follows:
A. The City Building Inspector shall issue a Building Permit
for the project upon Developer's satisfaotion of the
following conditions:
1. Combining the parcels on which the Project will be
located.
. 2. Granting Easements for utilities, driveways, fire
lanes and access from Lexington Avenue on forms
approved by the City's Attorney.
SE~~ BY:PETERSON FRAM BERGMAN: 7- 3-32 ; 4:07PM ;PETERSON FRAM BERGMA~ ;# 4/ 5
. 3. Approval of Grading and Drainage Plans for the
Project by the City's Engineer.
4. Issuance of appropriate permits by the Rice Creek
Watershed District
5. Satisfaction of the City's Park Land Dedication
requirements.
6. Filing of a Landscaping Bond in an amount
determined by the City's Planner.
B. Developer shall have sixty (60 ) days from the date of
this Agreement to satisfy the conditions stated in
Sections 3(A)1 through 3(A)6 or the City Council's
authorization to issue a BUilding Permit shall expire and
the Developer shall resubmit site plans for approval
which shall be in compliance with the current Clty
Regulations.
C. Developer shall construct the project according to site
plans approved by the City.
D. The air supported structures shall be removed wi thin five
. (5) years of the date of this Agreement or Developer, at
least ninety (90) days prior to the expiration date of
the initial five (5) year period, shall request that the
City grant an extension of three (3) additional years.
Upon receipt of such request, the Ci ty shall grant the
extension if Developer provides data or information in a
form acoeptable to the City which indicates that:
1. Developer has made a good :Eaith effort to obtain
financing for a permanent structure but is unable
to obtain such financing; and,
2. Developer need additional time to repay debt
incurred to construct the project.
E. In the event that Developer ceases to utilize the air
supported struotures as a tennis facility during the
.
-
,-
SENT BY:fETERSON FRAM BERGMAN: 7- 8-82 : 4:07PM ;PETERSON FRAM BERGMA~ :# 5/ 5
. initial five (5 ) year term or any extension thereof,
Developer shall move the air supported structures from
the site and otherwise secure the property so that it is
in oompliance with the City's Development Regulations.
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
City Administrator
DEVELOPER
Dennis Foster '-
bl j /10460%4.001
.
.
. . ~
.
July 10. 1991
TO: Counci1members
FROM: Dale Hicks
RE: Park dedication for What-A-Racquet Sports Courts, Inc.
Mr. Foster gave me the attached proposal for park dedication. I
discussed it with him and suggested the following changes.
1. Think 10% rather than 8%.
2. Consider interest on the delayed payment; he proposed
prime rate when we discussed this.
I also told Mr. Foster that we would accept his appraisers value
. of the undeveloped property if we believe it to be reasonable.
If not, we would get another appraisal.
~- .
II) if/b -t ~ JJi;;;t U
.
(!~: p-a.cb-t
'1/10/"1-
r- , .
.d
n
-,'
, , .
.1 To: Dale Hicks
1 Arden Hills City Council
I From: Dennis Foster
I What-A-Racquet Sports Courts, Inc.
I SLlbjectl Park Dedication
I Date: June 7 1992
i .,,:, ~
I
I The intent of this memo is to add'....ess Section 22-9 of the Arden Hills
I
I Municiple Code, Public Use Dedication, sub--sect ion (b) , Recreation and
I Conservation.
I. F'el'-centage of Dedication.
I
Pal"agraph (2) states "The percentage of dedicC\tion .. . shC\ll not
I e>:ceed 10'1." of the tract to be developed.
!
Th e SLlb -sec t i on also stC\tes "In determining the percentC\ge of
I
1 dedication, the City Council shall take into consideration the C\mount
tJf open space, park, recreati onal or commons areas and facilities
which the developer has designed into the proposed development for LIse
. by occupants of the development."
A. It is obvi OLIS that our entire development is designed for
Ilrecreational" use.
B. It is also only good business sense for us to allow our
I employees (occLlpants) free use of those facilities.
I C. In a ver'y si mi lC\r fashion to a park, the central val LIe of our
development is to provi de an opportunity for the surrounding
I
I community to enjoy recreational activities. We are, in effect,
I comparable to a park facil ity.
I D. The maintenance cost of those facilities are born by us, not
I the ci'ty.
;
,
I E. Control
! Data (and others) have long used the western half of
l the property for outdoor voll eyball games, and as a place to plant
(;]ardens. We intend to continue to allow those uses, not only to
Cont:l-al Di::lta~ but othel"' comparlies and residents as well, at. no
cost~ (There wi 11 be a temporary interruption due to construction
activities. )
Since other p,,,rk ded:Lcations, according to poll-agraph (1) , range from
6% to 1.0'1., we an; as~d ng the council to accept e:\n 8% dedication.
; . II.
Cash vs. Property.
Paragraph (4) of this section states "...the City Council may require
the developer to pay the City, as an eqLlivalent contribution, ,.an
amount in cash equal to the percentage of land. .. " Our development
.
plans are such that we are unable to donate land to the city, and
.",.,-
, ,
if"
'.'
. sti 11 maintain minimum lfgreen-sp8cell r-equir-ements. Ther-efor-e, we are
as~dng the City to exercise its option, and accept cash in 1 i eu of
pr-oper-ty.
I I 1. Fair- Market Val Lie.
Par-,,,gr-aph (4) also states the amount of cash should be " eqLlal to the
pel"centage of I and .". , multiplied by the fair mar-ket val Lie of the
prc1per-ty "t the time. e)f final approval of the development
application. "
A. The application for- this development was submitted May 11,
1992. The Planning Commission is scheduled to act on it June 3,
1 (7'92 ~ and the City Council on June 8, 1992. Ther-efor-e, this would
def i. nE, the Iltime (fl"ame) of f i. nal approval of the development
ap p 1 i cat i on II .
D. Par-agraph (4) states "The fair- mar-ket value of the proper-ty
shall be deter-mined by r-eference to cur-r-ent appr-aisal data .. . "
.
I have attached a copy o.f a por-tion of C:l:n appr-aisal fr-om Appr-aisal
Resecarc:h Associates, LTD., completed and dated May 20, 1992. This
obviously meet. the lItime (fr-ame) of fi nOlI apPII'""ovalll by the City.
The appr-aisal, OIl thOLlgh secur-ed for- a di.ffer-ent pLlrpose, ShOLll d
. accurately define the market val. Lie of the pr-oper-ty. It was
completed by a local, well'-establ i shed f i lI'""m, according to all
appr-opriate Appr-aisal guidelines (such as FIERREA. acc, and
LlSPAP) . As statted in the document cover letter, the appraiser-s
Ifhay(= no personal i ntenest Dr bias with respect to the subject
matter " and on page 1(l~ It.?m 10, "The compensation for- thi s
.. . ,
I"eport is NOT contingent Llpon the reporting of a pre determined
val LIe "
.. . .
The appr-aiser-s went on to compar-e this proper-ty to five other-
recent vacant 1 and sales of compar-able size, location, use, etc.
(pages 30 to 41 of attached appraisal). Their- conclL\sion, as
shDwn~ is that the property has a current fair market value of
$420,000.
We are asking the Council to accept this figLlre for Park Dedication
calculations.
*IV. Pi"yment Gchedul e.
As with m.ny new business developments, cash-.f 1 ow is of VE.ry high
concern to LIS. We are a new corporation, and have very limited
roeser'YES. Therefore, we are asking for
A) A si>:-month delay in the payment of these funds
. B) A monthly payment of $10,000 per month, starting December- 1,
1992.
Therefore, if the total dedication is $33,600, payments of $10,000
would be made December 1, 1992, January 1 and Febr-Llary 1, 1993, and a
fin al payment of $3,600 on March 1, 1993. "
r .it'
._.v ,x~
.
Please let me know if this adequately fulfills the Park Dedication
r-equirements of the City.
Dennis Foster
~ '~~/
.--/' ~.v4-V1 ./<:/'~' '?-?
i
.
.
.
.
.
APPRAISAL OF:
That Proposed Tennis Club,
Located At 4155 Lexington Avenue North,
Arden Hills, Minnesota
.
VALUATION DATE; May 20, 1992
Kevin D. Baker, Appraiser
vlilliam J. Peterson, SRA/SRPA
APPRAISAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, LTD.
2310 West County Road D
Ne\" Brighton. t"innesota 55112
(612) 636-2565
.
I
"
~
j
,-
j
,
, APPRAISAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, LTD.
STEVENSON-EDWARDS & ASSOCIATES
2310 County Road D . New Brii'hton, Minnesota 55112
(612) 636-2565 FAX: (612) 633-0394 (612) 633-0779
i May 28, 1992
I
I
I Mr. Dennis Foster
1415 Arden Oaks Drive
, Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112
I
HE: 4155 Lexington Avenue North
Arden Hills, Minnesota
Dear Mr. Foster:
In accordance with your request, we have completed an
appraisal of the above referenced property for the purpose
of estimating its probable market value in the fee simple
interest. The following written report presents the
findings, analysis and conclusions of this appraisal. We
. have made a complete inspection of the subject property and
have fully identified the real estate in our written report.
After careful consideration of the many factors influencing
value" it is our opinion that the subject property has a
value, as of May 20, 1992, based on the financing described
herein, of: 9\t-J&
V 01'
TJ)~<\.LDN"L.J:S.T.-il!.ATE OF VALUE: p- I ~ ~/
Market Value: ~ \)
One Million Six Hundred ~ f p V . ~~Y
Thousand DOllar~ ~
$1,600,000 S ~~
\ 5-~
We have no personal interest or bias with respect to the
subjec-: matter of this appraj:;31 report 0::'- th(~ po:.ti c:s
involved. The 2ppraisal is made subject to ,......nr..."":',~'r'
'-~..L ....'-'_..
assumptions 8nd limiting conditions which are listed in this
report. It conforms with accepted professionnl, ethical and
performance standards of the real estate appraisal pructice.
If you have any questions or comments after reading this
,. appraisal, please contact us.
This report conforms to the Appraisal guidelines set forth
by, FIERREA, the ace, and the USPAP, as we understand those
guidelines.
~
)
,
. The undersigned appraiser certifies that he/she has
personally inspected the property and has investigated
information believed to be pertinent to the valuation of the
property, and to the best of his knowledge and belief, the
statements and opinions expressed herein are correct and
reasonable, subject to the limiting conditions set forth
herein.
APPRAISAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, LTD.
Certified to this day of May 28, 1992.
~,
/~/. I//" )
j. ;~-/
I---.......__,~-'/ ___-.--./ --
Kevin 0. Baker, Apprgi
I ~ n./'
. I
"-'
/SRPA
.
'.
,
.J
. SUMMARY OF SALIENT DaTA
; LOCATION:
4155 Lexington Avenue North,
Arden Hills, Minnesota
.
)
II SUBJECT PHOTO: II
TYPE OF PRaPERTY: Proposed Tennis Facility
LAND SIZE: 8.74 Acres
ZONING: Industrial
DATE OF INSPECTION: May 20, 1992
PROPERTY RIGHTS APPRAISED: Fee simple interest
DATE OF LAST TRANSACTION: None within the last three
years
. TYPE OF TRANSACTION: N/A
SALES PRICE, IF KNOWN: N/A
)
1
-~-.-
- I
.
TOTAL 1992 REAL ESTATE TAXES: $23,427.66*
GROSS BUILDING SIZE: 10,050 SF Locker Rooms and
Racquet Ball Courts
62,940 SF Tennis Bubbles
* The taxes and assessors estimated market value are for
only the eastern half of the subject property. According
to Ramsey County Records, the western half is still a part
of a larger parcel and has not been divided.
VALUE ESTIMATED BY:
COST APPROACH; $1,600,000
MARKET DATA APPROACH: N/A
ECONOMIC APPROACH: N/A
1
FINAL VALUE ESTIMATE COMPOSED OF:
. LAND VALUE:
VALUE:
TOTAL MARKET VALUE: Sl,600,000
TQTAL FI~SL-ESTIMATE OF V<L~
Market Value:
) One Million Six Hundred
Thousand Dollars
$1,600,000
..
,
.
) ~
. , .
-.,
. ~RTY IDENTIFICATION
ADDRESS: 4155 Lexington Avenue North,
Arden Hills, Minnesota
USE CATEGORY: Tennis and Racquetball Facility
IMPROVED: The subject site is currently vacant
but is proposed for a tennis and
racquetball facility. The proposed
improvements include a 10,050 square
foot locker room and racquetball
building and two air supported
structures for tennis courts containing
62,940 square feet.
THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
See Site Plan in Addendum
CURRENT TAXES: $23,427.66*
. ASSESSORS ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE: $399,000*
PID NUMBER: 22-30-23-44-0003 and
a portion of 22-30-23-
41-0002
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT INFORMATION:
The subject is valued as Free and Clear
1 FLOOD ZONE: Not located within a
flood prone area per
Community Panel Number
270375 0001 B for the
City of Arden Hills,
Minnesota.
CENSUS TRACT: Tract #408.01
* The taxes and assessors estimated market value are for
only the eastern half of the subject property. According
to Ramsey County Records, the western half is still a part
of a larger parcel and has not been divided.
'.
5
)
--
,
. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
MEMORANDUM
DATE: JUly 10, 1992
TO: Mayor and City CoI.mcil
FRCM: Tery Shields, lIdmin. Secretary
~: 1992 street Recycling DIlprovanen.ts (Dunlap street and
Round lake Road West)
Attached is the following infonnation for your review and consideration:
1. Letter dated July 9, 1992, from Engineer Graham regarding
the bid opening of the 1992 street Recycling Inprovements
(Dunlap street and Round Lake Road West).
2. Resolution No. 92-46 Accepting the Bid in the Matter of the
1992 street Cold In-Place Recycling Inprovements.
3. Resolution No. 92-47 Establishing Commercial/Industrial
Assessment Rate for 1992 Cold In-Place Recycling
Inprovements .
4. Resolution No. 92-48 Determining Assessed Cost of
. Improvement and Ordering Preparation of Proposed Assessment
Roll in the Matter of the 1992 street Cold In-Place
Recycling Inprovements.
~ATION:
staff recommends adoption of Resolution Nos. 46, 47, and 48.
ACITON REQUIRED:
If Cormcil con=, they should adopt RESOLUTIOO m. 92-46 Accepting the
Bid in the Matter of the 1992 street Cold In-Place Recycling
Improvements; RESOLUTIOO m. 92-47 Establishing Commercial/Industrial
Assessment Rate for 1992 Cold In-Place Recycling Inprovements; and
REroLUTIClN m. 92-48 Detennining Assessed Cost of Inprovement and
Ordering Preparation of Proposed Assessment Roll in the Matter of the
1992 street Cold In-Place Recycling Inprovements.
Engineer Graham will be present to answer questions or concerns.
Attachments
;fa. ~~-C;f
,.
. ~~,,:,I- CONSULTING ENGINEERS
Maier Stewart & Associates Inc.
July 9, 1992
File No: 520-034-20
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Arden Hills
1450 W. Highway 96
Arden Hills, MN 55112
RE: BID OPENING
1992 STREET RECYCLING IMPROVEMENTS
Dear Council Members:
Bids were received and opened at 10:00 a,m. on July 9, 1992 for the above referenced project. A
total of three bids were received. Following is a list of bidders and their bids. An itemized bid
tabulation is also attached.
. CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID
Ashbach Construction Co. $82,948.10
Valley Paving, Inc. $83,534.90
Midwest Asphalt, Inc. $90,260.50
The estimated construction cost for cold in-place recycling of Round Lake Road West and Dunlap
Street was $108,200,
We have contacted references provided by Ashbach Construction Co" Inc. for similar type work
completed for Ramsey County and the State of Minnesota. All references indicated that the
Contractor is proficient in this type of work and has completed work meeting all project
specifications. Dan Schaat with the Ramsey County Public Works Department has indicated that
Ashbach Construction Co. is the largest cold in-place recycler in the Twin Cities.
Based on these references, we are prepared to recommend award of the 1992 Street Recycling
Improvements to Ashbach Construction Co., Inc. as the lowest responsible bidder after the
assessment hearings for Dunlap Street and Round Lake Road. A resolution is attached for your
consideration which sets the assessment hearing date for August 10, 1992.
The assessment rate for these improvements is based on the project cost, calculated as follows:
Actual Construction Bid $ 82,948.10
Administration, Fiscal, Legal (32 %) $ 26,543.40
. Total Project Cost $109,491.50
1959 SLOAN PLACE, SUITE 200, ST. PAUL. MINNESOTA 55117 612-774.6021
9800 SHELARD PARKWAY. SUITE 102, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55441 612-546-0432 . Equal Opportunity Employer
. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
JULY 9, 1992
PAGE TWO
Based on the City's Assessment Manual, the project will be funded by assessing 50% of the
project cost, equal to $54,745,75, to the abutting property owners, while the remaining 50% will
be funded by the City,
An estimated assessment rate of $14 to $15 was presented at the public hearings held on June 8,
1992. Based on the bids received, however, a reduction of the estimated assessment rate to
$10.73 per linear foot can be supported. This rate is based on 2600 linear feet of front footage on
Round Lake Road West and 2500 linear feet of front footage on Dunlap Avenue for a total
assessable footage of 5100 feet.
Attached for your review and consideration are three resolutions pertaining to the August 10, 1992
assessment hearing. The first resolution accepts the bids. The second resolution establishes the
commercial/industrial equivalent assessment rate for cold in-place recycling as $10.73 per front
foot. The third resolution determines the costs to be assessed and orders preparation of an
assessment roll.
We will be in attendance at the July 13, 1992 City Council meeting to further discuss this matter,
. Sincerely,
MAIER STEWART AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
/f~ 41~frU-
Mark J. Graham, P.E.
MJG/ks
enc.
034-0901.JUL
.
i
'I
I I
Ii'
I ' i
t !
. I I
, I
I I
, I
: I
i I
I '
I !
I i
, '
i [ I
i I
I '
" .1 k
" -- -~ --~
: :=: I :
.: ~ --. I ,_, <;::'. <0> oQ. t
I 1~~Ji ;;~:~r= ~~z=z ~ -
I.. l:f - ;= I I ,'; :;: ~ ~:;o , ,'" ~ ~ ~': -'''';' ' ~,
, .::a!;'e [: . --'~: .', ~~,.;o;:C<~' '0;
I _,. = _. /' ' oX- <>- t... .",.. "'-'
I . ""- - -~ ' .
I "">........ . I . ,,-,.
I : ....,.~, t : M-. -c....... '- 0..
r i;;;~.Ji '-~'"';~": ~=.,..~,'
,....... __ I _. ? ...... rr, .--. 0:::' L"'-! r-- 0::"
[ .!, ~ ~ J .i. ,. ~. - .; ;ce: :~ :~
Lee. . ""'-' ,
; ;: H:ir mHi~ g;mi:;
~ [ ~ 'f ~ ~ [ , ,,' '. ,p
~"Ii 1 ~~d i :'::;~'j :~"~, ~'~ ,
~ ~ I ~ ,~ = . - ,~ _. ,', ':
_ ,,=' _ N ~"
0: = ,_ 0'.' . _ .'. 0' =: I
, = .. ~ ' ' ",,'
""",,,.J:;;; i!_ ii. - " = I
0= ~ g;: ~ :i::: : ~ ,;x, g ~ ~ <=> 1- :::: '
_ = , ~ r ';l'i :, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~:;C g-' ."'. ~ Q <, - <> ' :3
0:::: '-'- f....., .;:::> ._.._1 ~ /',-."...-. ~ c.... ~~..., <;::. ::::;,
':"="') :=:_ _;; _::1.--~ ,~
:i:;::::i!';j : - ,:::E ,., 1-
_.-=~ ',- f'- ,^,' ,~.
: .. ':': "] ': .:~ ~ ._ ,J ,~ ,:;; ~ '" = ~ ~ l' ,; ~ ~:I'
, __~_ ,'" __ ~:a! ' ~='.
! ~ ~ ~ ~! j : i '" E1 ~ ._~: ~,~, ~ "'~.; ~ ;::: ~
: :le. g= :'= 1:-::::;;:;'" = 1';= ~~::;: ~ ~....
, ~~ ,= ",:~,=,~3 _ ~,~ "'''' =2
: :;:::., : _ , ;:; ;:;; ~ . ". ': ;:j ,'" ~ _ _ _ i
: :g :,,,,,:~:~~=~ ;;;;:~=;~~ ~ ~= '
, ,'- ,-' =- ~ "~--- - =~. ,-
"" , ,i, ~ I, 5 :.... = ~ = "",:>! 'b .,,~.~' - ~ , ,.'
=: ! :'~ ;:~:~=,..,_ 5 ::;:~';:'~~ - _t:;':j-
-, ,= "'~=- ,- =,~' - ~= "
~: : i~ 'i_i1:~::;Z ." ;;:;i~~:::~::;;:; :=~ '~,~-
.::.:.. I .' .....- r _ I ",- = ,~ ;;: ~>.J ' , :;;, ~~ .= = ~ ~ ,;< ~ '-,
;= : : _ I: ~ : = ~ ,~ ~ ~ oJ; ,: '"" 5; -:' - - :=: := g ~ :;::
. _ : :: ~ ' '" _ t~ ,... ,~ ,: "",, " -~ '.' ::;; - ~.
_, 0 . li_:~'~;:;;:::= -, ~i:=:~"'~ N ~= ~.-
_, , : ,:~: ~__"" '" =i:;3~~'t"',~, = ~~ ; ",,-""
I : I' : ~ , ;:::,..' ,', ,-, :;:; - ::;::: = e. - = =~. ;;;; - 1~' =' ,'"
! i ~ ~ i i = , :-:;:~::: ~ ~ 5: i ~ ~ ~ f-1 ~ ~ -~ ~ 51 ~;=<
; ,_ I -1 ..-::. 1 -<r. .,..... "'..... u"" <-..' = == "-" ;1 -........::::
I 1 - . <.r~ ~ "....... ~...... .::..::
-~-~ -~ ~~-
; _. ., "'.. =
I' ' i - ' =-
, I i
, i
I ' '
. ' '
,_ '..... r--' , _~.__' 1
,., , ~ '-'_':" . =-""=~.:;::-:::::::;::,~: """"-::::., _::::.':..A; ~_ ." ~ :..-:'::::, - ::::.............~:~ :0. --
. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 92-~
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING TIlE BID
IN TIlE MATTER OF THE 1992 STREET
COLD IN-PLACE RECYCLING IMPROVEMENTS
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolutions 92-38 and 92-40, competitive bids were solicited and
received for the 1992 Street Cold In-Place Recycling Improvements as set forth in
the bid tabulation attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the amount of the bids and the responsibility of the
bidders.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arden Hills,
Minnesota:
1. The bids received on July 9, 1992 for the 1992 Street Cold In-Place Recycling
Improvements are hereby accepted.
!
,
. Passed and adopted this 13th day of July, 1992.
Thomas R. Sather, Mayor
ATTEST:
Catherine J, Iago, Deputy City Clerk
.
--------
. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
RAMSEY COUNTY, :MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 92-....!tl
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL
ASSESSMENT RATE FOR 1992 COLD IN-PLACE
RECYCLING IMPROVEMENTS
WHEREAS, the City Assessment Manual outlines the methods of determining that the
commercial/industrial equivalent assessment rate shall be based on 50% of the cost
of cold in-place recycling improvements plus all associated overhead costs for a
typical residential street section.
WHEREAS, the City Council shall establish, by resolution, the commercial/industrial equivalent
assessment rate for cold in-place recycling improvements on an annual basis as
determined by comparable project data available to the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arden Hills,
Minnesota:
l. The commercial/industrial equivalent assessment rate for cold in-place recycling
. improvements constructed in 1992 shall be SIII.':'J per assessable front foot.
, ~ ll.\\t>
Passed and adopted this 13th day of uly, 1992.
ATTEST: Thomas R. Sather, Mayor
Catherine J, Iago, Deputy City Clerk
.
, ,
. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS u~
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 92-~
A RESOLUTION DETERMINING ASSESSED COST OF
IMPR~~jr AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF
PROPOS ASSESSMENT ROLL IN THE TTER OF
THE 1992 TREET COLD IN-PLACE ~CLING
.\
\
\
WHEREAS, costs have been determil1;ed for the 1992 StJ;eet Cold In-Place Recycling
Improvement consisting of a contract price of $82,948,10 and expenses incurred or
to be incurred by the City'jn the making of the improvement in the amount of
$26,543,39 for a total cosf'lf the improvement of $109,941.50,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arden Hills,
Minnesota: .
1. Based upon the City Assessment Policies, it is determined that the portion of this
improvement to be paid by the City and not assessed to benefited properties is $54,745,75,
2, The portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited properties pursuant to the Arden
Hills City Assessment Policies shall be $54,745,75.
. 3, The assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments and shall extend over a
period of five (5) years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before September
15, 1992, with interest at the rate of 8,()()% per annum from the date of the adoption of the
assessment resolution,
4, The City Administrator with the assistance of the Project Engineer shall forthwith calculate
the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable
lot, piece, or parcel of land, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and
shall have available at the City Administrator's office a copy of the proposed assessment
roll for public inspection.
5, Upon completion of the proposed assessment roll, the City Administrator shall notify the
Council and schedule a publ~earing on August 10, 1992 upon the proposed assessment,
causing notice of the hearing by publication and mail to be made at least two weeks prior to
the hearing,
Passed and adopted this 13th day of July, 1992.
ATTEST: Thomas R. Sather, Mayor
. Catherine J. Iago, Deputy City Clerk
. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 92-48
A RESOLUTION DETERMINING ASSESSED COST OF
IMPROVEMENT AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ROLL IN THE MATTER OF
THE WEST ROUND LAKE ROAD 1992 COLD IN-PLACE RECYCLING
WHEREAS, costs have been determined for the 1992 Street Cold In-Place Recycling
Improvement consisting of a contract price of $51,643.60 and expenses incurred or
to be incurred by the City in the making of the improvement in the amount of
$16,525.95 for a total cost of the improvement of $68,169.55.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arden Hills,
Minnesota:
1. Based upon the City Assessment Policies, it is determined that the portion of this
improvement to be paid by the City and not assessed to benefited properties is $34,084.78.
2, The portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited properties pursuant to the Arden
Hills City Assessment Policies shall be $34,084.78.
. 3. The assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments and shall extend over a
period of five (5) years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before September
15, 1992, with interest at the rate of 8.00% per annum from the date of the adoption of the
assessment resolution.
4. The City Administrator with the assistance of the Project Engineer shall forthwith calculate
the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable
lot, piece, or parcel of land, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and
shall have available at the City Administrator's office a copy of the proposed assessment
roll for public inspection.
5. Upon completion of the proposed assessment roll, the City Administrator shall notify the
Council and schedule a public hearing on August 10, 1992 upon the proposed assessment,
causing notice of the hearing by publication and mail to be made at least two weeks prior to
the hearing.
Passed and adopted this 13th day of July, 1992.
ArrEST: Thomas R. Sather, Mayor
. Catherine J. Iago, Deputy City Clerk
. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 92-49
A RESOLUTION DETERMINING ASSESSED COST OF
IMPROVEMENT AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ROLL IN THE MATIER OF
THE DUNLAP STREET 1992 COLD IN-PLACE RECYCLING
WHEREAS, costs have been determined for the 1992 Street Cold In-Place Recycling
Improvement consisting of a contract price of $31,304.50 and expenses incurred or
to be incurred by the City in the making of the improvement in the amount of
$10,017.44 for a total cost of the improvement of $41,321.94.
NOW, TIIEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arden Hills,
Minnesota:
1. Based upon the City Assessment Policies, it is determined that the portion of this
improvement to be paid by the City and not assessed to benefited properties is $20,660.97.
2, The portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited properties pursuant to the Arden
Hills City Assessment Policies shall be $20,660.97.
. 3, The assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments and shall extend over a
period of five (5) years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before September
15, 1992, with interest at the rate of 8.00% per annum from the date of the adoption of the
assessment resolution.
4. The City Administrator with the assistance of the Project Engineer shall forthwith calculate
the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable
lot, piece, or parcel of land, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and
shall have available at the City Administrator's office a copy of the proposed assessment
roll for public inspection.
5. Upon completion of the proposed assessment roll, the City Administrator shall notify the
Council and schedule a public hearing on August 10, 1992 upon the proposed assessment,
causing notice of the hearing by publication and mail to be made at least two weeks prior to
the hearing.
Passed and adopted this 13th day of July, 1992.
ATTEST: Thomas R. Sather, Mayor
. Catherine J. Iago, Deputy City Clerk
,
. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
MEM:lIUIN[)(JM
DATE: July 10, 1992
TO: Mayor and city oounc:i1
FRCK: Tery Shields, Mmin. secretary~
stJBJ][)'I' : Driveway Issue - Mr. Francis Podlasek
Per Council direction at the June 29 Council meeting, attachErl is a
letter datErl July 7, 1992, from Engineer Graham re::rarding the driveway
for Mr. Francis Po:ilasek, 4410 North Snelling Avenue.
Engineer Graham will l:e present to answer questions and =ncerns.
Attachment
.
.
.
. CONSULTING ENGINEERS
Maier Stewart & Associates Inc.
July 7, 1992
File No: 520-019-30
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Arden Hills
1450 W. Highway 96
Arden Hills, MN 55112
RE: POD LASEK DRIVEWAY ISSUE
NORTH SNELLING AVENUE
Dear Council Members:
As directed at the June 29, 1992 City Council meeting, we have estimated the cost to remove the
existing pavement surface on Mr. Podlasek's driveway from the concrete driveway apron to his
garage slab and to excavate to a uniform depth of 6". The length of this work is approximately
120 feet and the driveway width is 18 feet, We have assumed that the existing bituminous surface
. is nominally 2" thick. The quantities necessary to remove 6" of depth would be bituminous
pavement removal of the existing surface and common excavation to the required depth. Based on
calculated quantities of 240 square yards of pavement removal and 30 cubic yards of common
excavation, the estimated cost to complete this work is $1,500. This cost estimate is based on
average information provided by small driveway contractors familiar with this type of work,
These costs are significantly higher than if any further work would have been completed as part of
the street reconstruction project.
The discussions during the project with Mr. Podlasek would have extended new bituminous
surfacing to a point approximately 40 feet back from the roadway. Based on the contract prices,
which could have been used, the cost to complete this work would have been $376.
Please contact me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
MAIER STEWARf AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
~ad-4~
Mark J. Graham, P.E.
MJG/ks
cc: Ms, Cathy Iago, City of Arden Hills
. 019-0701.JUL
1959 SLOAN PLACE, SUITE 200, ST. PAUL. MINNESOTA 55117 612-774-6021
9800 SHELARD PARKWAY, SUITE 102, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOfA 55441 612-546-0432' Equal Opportunity Employer
__u________ --.. ---
;
(f) ;(~
. If' 'eJJ//h-
;tD
In-~~71991, ~~ ~
u~- ~ ~ ~ :J ~ e.a~t.ed- JJc.~
/;J~4~~' ~
X:h-,~ ~~ cJj~~' ~
~ ~~? ('...jJ~ ~ ~
~.I'..qJ~~~~
~) 1'-J--IuufL ~ ~. I(
~~u.a.z-~; ac~
~) ~ ~ ~ 1::.iL~,)
. ~~~~~(Ht..P.-~ ~
~; '::I~,..fJ ~'Z ~ ~LQ.
~ ~ ~ d:: .<LL.:t;. Q.X', ?1(cu.k ~~
~ CH.J::. t, ~.1:AaZti..e.- ~ ~
~ to P .ap to a... /3~ ~; ~~.
~~~,J~~ ~~:t:AAU::.
-Zh.- ?~ ~.~~
.
~ a.. S "/,,, ~ o-x. ~
CVufL~ ~ ~ ~ ~.::C/t...Jz.
~/~~~~ trJ<-)
, ; '; ~ 'i~
a ~~,,~ .I
VU1 dR... 7 "1" ,
~ ~ t.A.a.dL ~ ; JU..:t;;
. ~ cvx-&- '-A.L. ~ '~ ~; ACe...~,)
~~~t;~~~.ti..e..~
,to ~ ~ ~ ~ ~a~~ ~--,k,
. --~
~
.
~ 'I~", ~4Arn<L~~j
~~~~~ti-e..~
~ ...k. ~ a.;:C, ..I;e~. J:c ~
~~~~~~Z:o
~~.
c9/ZAU tiuL ~ ~J ~
~~~~t,~~-
~~Mt.~~:;da:L~c
h- ~ ~ Cv'Jf-dL U.l?.. ~ ~ ~ A~du:
..J ~:nc~ 4t~~ ~
. ~ ~ ~'-A..e.. ~.~M ~
~~~xk~~, Ii<..-
~kJcL~~/ntL~~
~.
/~ ~Yle...~~~
~J~~~~~-
~~~.QI~ ".
~a./XdLa~~~~
~ d.o all ZLrJ d.vt.r: ~ ~~
~~.L:b~~~~O?L
;t:Iu..-~J~~/~~~
~. L1c.~~J...J~~~
. ~ftR.-~~~~~
~~, J:c~~~~
~ ~ ..:t:A.a.z ~ Q/J<.., "
d" 1o-tJ (;t:..tA:c..J ~'fldY) ~ ~
r
{!J
.
~~~~-~~
, ~.t:c~~~~0/Jd:
~h~~~.-;,~~
h(~~~~J (/~~~
)1(aAfi... .Jx. ~ ~ ~. J/ r1z. .bta.:C ~ J
.uM!-~~,
~~~~d~
~ )~~~~~
.
~~O-~~#
tjl~~~J..J~t;"~
. ~~~~~~~
~ ~ to ~:;;tLR... ~-
~ ~ r;-o ~ ~ ~ c:LtA..:c~)
~~I~ ~~r:tL.t..~~~
to~~#
~~~ fYJ<-~ ~~
~~, :i:Le-~~~
~ /YJUL. cU-u/-n.. CVJUL ~ :t.1u-~-
~~~~~~~
z6 ~7G #
~.~~~~
~~~~a..~~o~u:t:.
. 1-/0 ~ ~ ~~. ~ ~--t;..&f..
~r:.z~~~~~~
~~~a>d~~~
,~~~~~h-:t:iL de~L.
" ,
(j)
.
'?o ~ ~ U<2i~~ --I ~ C!.tVW... ~
~~~Oj~~~~
~'Z do ~ ~ tHA- /YUAf' ~
~~to~. ~
~. ~c;L~~~J~
~:..:t: dAJ ~ ~ c>-x.- CVU-7f 6-f ~
~~~LD~3/~~~
~~I
-J~~a...~~}
~o-uZ~~~~~~~
. ~~~~
cUL..J~~.ti.L~ I&~~ ~
~~~S~~
,.; ~ ~ g-e.:c. ~~ ~
~. ..J/J<- ~J -J ~ ..:t:;; ~ a....,
~~,;:;t;Iu.. ~ r:i ~~ 'to
~~, 7(aZUA~L4:)V~~~
~~~~~"
Y/#L.~. 01, /CJ9tR,J' ~
. I ~
~ ~ ,a<d€.~~<i2/~ GLJ
~~~~~~~c;LJ
~~~~~~..x-~~
. ~1:;'~'c:zJ~~~,
~ ~~~~~~
/ ~~)~~t:b~A6-ft~~,
!/ 'iblt. ~. ~~
v ,~ ~ -tIc.-e. , "
@
.
V M-fd ~ ~vJ~
~::l ~ ~ -th- ~ cvxd2- ~
~ ~trJL~~,~~
~~~~~~~CVJufL.
~a-C~~.170.~~
-k ~ J.z; ~.:C1u2- ~ Ii> cLb ..L:c~)
~~~~~~tv/J-UJU.
#.R-- ~ tLUL. ./ !
a~~~.xU~J-..J~
~t:a~~~~~ta
. frA...L ~ X~fL ~ ~ ~ ~~ tb
! cLtJ it; ~~~, /l{A. ~
~~ .~~
~~~~~~~~
~~ ~~ ~ ~/h<..fL,
~~~ry.z~. CL~
~~~,.:U-C~~~~,
~.' ~~~~
~~~~~~~
/kA..4J~. ~)~~.~/./
,~~~/~I
~~~tiJ hV-.k~~)
. -I~:;t::~~} ~
/ f)~/1{C!~..J~ 'A-> . ~
v/klt. ;.S~ ~. '
! ~-.j~~~~, ~~)~
~
______ - u_
(1)
.
/f.-7t12U tft'Z ,/Jt(AR) J ~ A ~j J~,
..Jh ~dJ d4:& '*, ~<26 ~ t2/JoP
-6Wffb5fflr# fid J JNd ~ totft? 7J;?1.
"llu/JctP;. ~f ~ 0$ tm W ~
tA&J afld t:fJ ~# 7z;~ tV?oI tJ/ 4k!vp
M~<~
s4-f Jht/ :J' I ~ ~ '7JJ~ ,J Uf#
'/?7t/~~ ~~ &JJd J .0&JZir#Ju.J)io/L
waLL idla::/ ~ ~aA ~ ~~ aA/.
'1Y.f1 ~ '73J.f 4tUcJl -eM MT zM# Aim
. 7f/ ~ ~ 0/' 7Z; <:L /0::70 ~. 4~ J
40d d ~ .ky ~j /~Jao/..Lb?jJ
1/jr., ~ ,-j&ieiJ 7b t..ftUl tVd<1 I I J..!Jo 7b flC/
ttw;w, 11: -iky ~ VhfJ ~ / d# 4~ i/PU-6
~?/o
4A J 4ad/ d J:;V; ~d ~ ' J
~ ~ iYJT tV:Of ~ ~ -LI~ ~ ~
A~ ~/.1kM /0"% /s ~
;4f tL ~ d<<.b J ~ q... I, C02JU
J
~#w tUd 1/ ~ ~ ~. J1rdJtlfr). e;.f;
wy~~ I {/;1.YJn~ 7tI1;p;c ~ ~ ~~
Ci4' :Idr1J!jJ 6Vd' ~ ?I2d Jny ~ ~h?J tH0
. ~ tA1y;. J~.h.<~~ ~ *,
~~ cV7& ~ Jzu -/0 ~ ~,~~
7b ~~~ ~. ~ 4t1pe~
J<:;o ftJ~ '
.
\
,
(j)
.
~,JJ~~~~
~ti-e-~~:L:~,
Up:uL ~ yua ~~ h1- ~
~~.:t:i>~~~? ~~
~ ~ ~ ~;J ~~~<L)JJ
~...:bta..C~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~.
~/-d~~ ~~.
~t;,.u.~~ ~~~.~
~aA-~~ ~
. ~;d-<J d:M- ~ ~.~
~ 1:t: ~~.::t:h..- ~..
.J ~ ~ z;; ~ ~ t:.tLe.. '
~~dSJ~>>(e~~
A-IuL- ~~ to::r ~J ~ ~ Ao .
~~~ ~~
9WJu- ~~:U- ~. ~ ~ c&d/X'.;e
~~~~02f~
~,
.
..
..
J
. CHRONOLOGY
Before coming before the council I had three phone conversations
and nine meetings with representatives of the city of Arden
Hills. These are listed below.
1- Time: Immediately after curb was poured. Sept.-Oct.
I called Mark Graham and met him at my house the same day.
While Mr. Graham was there, at my request, one of the workmen re-
set the forms so that the concrete apron would run in a straight
line toward my concrete slab.
2. Time: A few days later. About early October.
I called Mark Graham and met with an associate he sent and the
job superintendent for Midwest Asphalt.
In the presence of the superintendent, Mr. Graham's associate
agreed to grade my driveway in a straight line to my concrete
slab, to replace the class 5 base, to re-grade my lawn, and re-
sod or seed the lawn at his discretion. I agreed to accept the
probable loss of three trees and to pay Midwest an additional
$800 for resurfacing the entire driveway.
. Mr Graham arrived just as the discussion was ending and his
associate told him that the matter had been settled. The meeting
then broke up with no further discussion.
3. Time: About two weeks later. Mid to late October.
I saw a blue line on my driveway about 40 feet in from the apron.
I sensed that the agreement was not going to be kept. No work
was done on any driveways and the October 31 storm came.
4. Time: About early March.
I went to the city hall and met with Gary Berger. We stood in
the council chambers and discussed all of the issues I was
concerned about. I asked him to come and take a look at my
driveway. He said he did not have the time ,then but that he
would get back to me later. He never did.
5. Time: About mid-March.
I went to the city hall and asked to get on the council agenda.
. Mr. Berger apparently heard me and came out of his office and set
a date to meet at my house.
~
.
. CHRONOLOGY - continued,
6 . Time: About two days later. Mid-March.
Mr. Berger and I met at my house. He said he would discuss the
matter with Mr. Graham and get back to me. I waited but never
heard anything from Mr. Berger.
7 . Time: Some time later,
I heard that Mr. Berger was no longer with the city. I went to
the city hall and met with Cathy Iago. She telephoned Mr. Graham
and I talked to him, We set a meeting for early May.
8. Time: Early May.
I met Mr. Graham at my house. He refused to do what I wanted to
have done and told me he could put in a 10% grade. He told me to
go to the council.
9. Time: Possibly mid-May.
I received a letter from Mr. Graham denying my requests. I went
. to the city hall. Cathy Iago suggested I go to the council but I
was very angry and felt that I wouldn't get anywhere with the
council.
10. Time: After the blacktopping was done.
I saw how badly my driveway was done and decided I had to go to
the council. I set a council date for about mid-June but changed
it to June 26 so Dorothy McClung could be present. As it
happened her work kept her from attending.
1l. Time: June 26.
This was my first appearance before the council.
12. Time: July 13.
This is my second appearance before the council.
. ~&d I/'JSj>>~
7/3/9 Z-
Cf~n
- <. > , , . . . , . . , .
f:
, , ~
. ;.
" '
'~'"' 71/3/1~
. '"
... ~/1DV
... f'{I fl. \b ~ L;r; ~JL
'~\ 1)<;'
,~
..,
qA\' os; 'J"- NcD ~"L
... , )
..., \...UOJ1,\C O)..j 'H \~- )1 \ '\;G,\y!'\'~\
..,
. .n (DB\) ~\:;\.,'UZO ~cL 1(,,-1 "c) L
_ __. _ "n.'
. .......,-.
"..-.
... <t B ' ---..... - \
\ ~ ... ~l~ .[SJlf:/), 1 30 I
. ..,
L~:.., t~t9L'~ ~[fNAJ\~ '1''2.\\0
Hr"
3, ::: Co~\t'\AtJ<;6J~~l~~~~~ltO ...
_._.._n_____ _,.._~.~.
'.u___.__ -' ~"'.".~'" '" --- .-"-,- ---.- ...-.----
.,. -- "f-- '-- ,2Db6
~- ~
...
.'u._.'_._ _._"--.-.--...,----- -.......- -.- ...... ..,.. -----~... ,', -.._---.. .,
~.....~~~l~ '-, () r~j....~;/~() :...... _ . .,,'__,.__._"".__'''__ _,__._. _._.o__.ou_ _."_
_.'_~._____.'_'__Z_._' ___'___..___~.."__'" _._~.~.M .. " .,....._M.'.
_'..._......__..l~_.. "."'.p ""'.".."'.""=...'_..'.._......._.....m......,...'.....'." "'.",,, "..... .,..,......'......-....---....."
".,...,",.,',....,~~ ,~~~~.~~'-*'..~f:;'-.)~..'jY1qy})I)~m.1~ ~..=t: ~,.t~
.,_..._...._......_..~~Q "g\~(Y.~S ..A,",.JJ~...o_~'tm....aE_..~~}...~l.~._.~.;g;.....,....
.._...............J..........,' ,...,...-.... .,".' ".-.........-...."...-........-......-...- .. ""..,..... ,....._....-f6?p~.=_m
cJ!7/9?) f?eck I :t-, IJ JvJ
5/7.1' 3'(;9 +-~ /h{' Nt;
. eM fl-, bh'o/t; ~ ;'v11Y .sSQu f?
rVCthCi./ Pod I hJ elc LfL; '7 - 6'994
Lft.rro Jh e/ r ,'" '7 A v<t N
Pr-01e,, I~UI; / /'1 X/
GrurJfe o'/r(v,z f,v7 -Iv rh.;'v1~cAf
eve.. s/ c,/ e .f r?>)t.. Cbh( ve!-<'
, /;.,h- h Ot.-, j3'~rc.?-( Ie... C{'~
, Iv..e e f-_
f Jluffi hvy-})., Ji'cde ()? 7,c.ro1
a d/' Gte:. €,J. f- ~u L JI-(IV't!" "" c;-.- -f~
}l.-, c.. .f cj~, ex 1 /' h hf;? ./ ) o/R-
. R e-/t,urs- (LV ~c;,fcX/ e)( c. >?y./ {;,t(
f
@ ''"fS7. 6v f)66,6
, pl?7L-L Lj II..C-~ C led/' J
Ze.- X ?/J( ,f l(Zv, (.70
'"5./ ~'1./ @ {2.. u
, I {/ yc:b 1vf/'i'c;./ {,-;, 1/?-cJ ~
Zl..>b V
1&& yct/ Jill @ "Z J' 0 2.J v / f/I/
['I <;>"0,00 )
- ..-....~- -
. fJl?te-I<- ~UfJ R.e)1, uvc.,( b)7 ()wheJ->
___u_
_u.'u"", u_ :~---~L~ Ci-d,- - -,
-- ( --..._-.-.__._--- -. _.._----_._--~--_.- _. _____ _.____._"... u_
,
--------.---- - -.-.---.------ ~~~- -- -- -------------,,-" .-...- .----- -
----- ~-----
-~---_.. i - -- - - --- -- - --- -- - --~---- - ------ ------ - - - - --_._-
!
~____..__~.___ __L_.__
FROM Proposal No,
6 r~~ Page No,
.;t~, :r r Date
'Y\..... ,() '1 ) .sS//'"L
PROPOSAL SUBMITTED 0 , WORK_~O BE PERFORMED AT. t2.
Street .' Stre1!f;~ ~c-Jly ~~~
~ City '0 - ~ Stat:7./t..-v1 }
City State 7Y/vU Date ot Plans G.- - ;;2 S? - '7 2-- ~___
Telephone Architect I
~
J-l-t...
d2LJ,")
- J
All material is guaranteed to be as specified, and the above work to be performed in accordance with the drawings and
specifications submitted for above work and completed in a substantial workmanlike manner for the sum of
I ;;l / '/) I with payme ts to be made as follows: ~<yA2f:(!
Dollars ($ I tJ (''') ),
lUff- ( {JJ
Any alteration or deviation from above specifications involving extra costs, will be executed only upon written orders, and will
become an extra charge over and above the estimate. All agreements contingent upon strikes, accidents or delays beyond our
control. Owner to carry firel tornado and other necessary insurance upon above work. Workmen's Compensation and Public
Liability Insurance on above work to be taken out by ,.
Respectfully submitted
Per
NOTE. This proposal may be withdrawn by us if not accepted within & () days
""..~"-~".
'd', " " "'& ' "'.',, , ,," ..~.
OAc:}S1U'~""f'" ,',' ,"'~. '. .
~, ->.- ~ . -', '..~'''~- - .-". --:~~
The above prices, specifications and conditions ar~ satisfactory and are hereby accepted, You are authorized to do the work
as specified, Payment will be made as outlined above,
Sigl1ature
Signature
!}. Form 1123-181
JrupOl1ul Page No. 01 Pages
.
DESIGN/BUILD
GUDMUNSEN DESIGN & BUILDERS
1405 Silver Lake Road, Suite B-2
. NEW BRIGHTON, MINNESOTA 55112
(612) 636-8464
PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO PHONE DATE
STREET JOBHAME
CITY. STATE and ZIP CODE JOBLQCATION
ARCHITECT DATE OF PLAN$ JOB PHONE
lIlilr Jrapour hereby to furnish material and labor - complele' in accordance with specifications below, for the su.m 01;
- dollars ($ ? 1/'0 00 ),
Payment to be madll as follOwS: ,
All malerlells guaranteed 10 be as spaeIH'd. All work 10 be COmpleted In a workmanlike
m"MalllCCardlno loalan(!8rdpIQClkos,Anyallaratlonordavlatlen r'omspaclllcallonsba-
low inVOlving ut,. coata will be "."ellI8d only upon wrlllan order.. and will become an
axlr. cha'gaovurano:lobOvo \!\oaat!mala.Allag,oomanta conllngant upon atrlko8,"ccl_
(lenl~ 0' delays beyond our ~onlrol. Owner to cerry 11'0. lornado Rnd olhor necosu,y 30 days.
Insurence. O~r wor~O'3 ere fully cove,ed by Wo,~men'. Componsollon Insu,ance,
We hereby submllspecificaliofls ~ndeslimates lor:
PROJECT: Regrade 'dri veway from existing concrete garage apron to
new concrete approach at street.
. Sketches are a part of this proposal:
Remove 2- trees south side of driveway to be replanted after proper I
grade has been establ ished.
Remove approx. 60 yards of excess dirt from street to existing
concrete apron.
Contour north and south side of lawn to blend into new driveway
grade. Remove approx. 80 yards.
Install Allan Block retaining wall around existing tree to minimize
damage to tree and removal of existing soils.
Place 4" of Class #5 base on driveway and grade. I
I
Place 3" of top soil and sod north and south side of drive way
approx. 160 yards. (watering of sod to be by owner.)
All excess dirt to be removed from site.
Removable of existing bituminous to be done by others.
I
1 I
. 1\rr.rptunrr of 'rnpnlIal- The above prices. specilicalions I
and condilions are satisfactory and are herebyaccepled. You are authorized Signature
to do the work as speCified. Payment will be made as outlIned above. )
Date of Accllpl~nce; Slgnalure
FOntol. ra.] A"MoblO I",,,, tEmJrnc. Croton, tol.... olm
-. (/Jb&ul~
"
. CHRONOLaGY ff/~fi~
Before coming before the council I had three phonE
and nine meetings with representatives of the
Hills, These are listed below.
1. Time: Immediately after curb was poured. Sept.-oct.
I called Mark Graham and met him at my house the same day.
While Mr. Graham was there, at my request, one of the workmen re-
set the forms so that the concrete apron would run in a straight
line toward my concrete slab.
2. Time: A few days later. About early October.
I called Mark Graham and met with an associate he sent and the
job superintendent for Midwest Asphalt.
In the presence of the superintendent, Mr. Graham's associate
agreed to grade my driveway in a straight line to my concrete
slab, to replace the class 5 base, to re-grade my lawn, and re-
sod or seed the lawn at his discretion. I agreed to accept the
probable loss of three trees and to pay Midwest an additional
$800 for resurfacing the entire driveway.
.
Mr Graham arrived just as the discussion was ending and his
associate told him that the matter had been settled. The meeting
then broke up with no further discussion.
3. Time: About two weeks later. Mid to late October.
I saw a blue line on my driveway about 40 feet in from the apron.
I sensed that the agreement was not going to be kept. No work
was done on any driveways and the October 31 storm came.
4, Time: About early March.
I went to the city hall and met with Gary Berger. We stood in
the council chambers and discussed all of the issues I was
concerned about. I asked him to come and take a look at my
driveway. He said he did not have the time then but that he
would get back to me later. He never did.
5. Time: About mid-March.
I went to the city hall and asked to get on the council agenda.
. Mr. Berger apparently heard me and came out of his office and set
a date to meet at my house.
~
.
. CHRONOLOGY - continued.
6 . Time: About two days later. Mid-March.
Mr. Berger and I met at my house. He said he would discuss the
matter with Mr. Graham and get back to me. I waited but never
heard anything from Mr. Berger.
7. Time: Some time later.
I heard that Mr. Berger was no longer with the city. I went to
the city hall and met with Cathy lago. She telephoned Mr. Graham
and I talked to him. We set a meeting for early May.
8. Time: Early May.
I met Mr. Graham at my house. He refused to do what I wanted to
have done and told me he could put in a 10% grade. He told me to
go to the council.
9. Time: Possibly mid-May.
I received a letter from Mr. Graham denying my requests. I went
. to the city hall. Cathy lago suggested I go to the council but I
was very angry and felt that I wouldn't get anywhere with the
council.
10. Time: After the blacktopping was done.
I saw how badly my driveway was done and decided I had to go to
the council. I set a council date for about mid-June but changed
it to June 26 so Dorothy MCClung could be present. As it
happened her work kept her from attending.
11. Time: June 26.
This was my first appearance before the council.
12. Time: July 13.
This is my second appearance before the council.
. ~ I/'#Sl'~
7f6/9 2-
(!jc;
'.'.," , _ .i:
.." ._~
- 7/13/1d--......
. ...
.. ~J)OV
", s \ D'S jY\ Jl. - (b ~ LJTs ClL/
)iA\ (jJ;"J"i-N:0 f2C.L
.., \..uon.\c OJ.J }i \~- \ \ \;C::j",/j"\
::: GO\J ___l :(\..;~ ~CL. rc", \ ( ) L
\, ~,~ &10:" <t. 163 D ~! \
. .. )
2~'" to\(:$A,\ ~[fNAJ~ 1 '2.-\\0
,p . ......-
... .-
~,::: Co~tt'~N<;bJ \)i$lb})~2L~O h~
'... _ ,m~ .,
... 'f-.. ' -=- "ZOb6 ,-
... ,~ ..
..~ - -
N<?~~ '-, 0 ~\r~D' :...."."
. . () "".. ,..."....".., ........,.
.. ..............fNl~\tt>LJse:c ~.~L.i:....~E;...),\).. (fiJ)!J' 1 ~)u -t:~ tN\
."r'" '... ,.. ."",.m .",.", 't.... ....... .., ""'.
'..m......;~Q "Q\~(~ssA.JJ~o~'to'f6JENJ}\;-J~M....~.._
m.. .m.. .,'..,~,.".. ",... " ,....fT57P3.....:"
~ ' ,
(j!7/9) f?eck I ,'I-, t?Jv..J
J/7J :JC9+~ !if"", IV r;;
. CC1 tL, bh'dv ~ tv/IV 5'506 ~
fVCthU./ fuel I kJ eJ 'iLl LI_ 6'996
lj'1 {o fhe/r:""7 A/.-e' N
pvd e" l-i,.J/.; IV! X/
/
GJrC1cj1e dln'vi! /II.!,>" -Iv fh;.'(,rcAft
e l/ e" ;/ &1 e.f Tt:? it- C6f.,( v<!? 1-<
, ~Yz., J" 01-, jjit'.rc,j?..f. f& Ct'-!7
, k.ee}-_
f J1utfi hv;--Ih JI'c1e t> f 7C.Y0
ao!/'Gu::i?J,,} +u dVI1V--e"";7- -fL>
fl.-,. e. f c..h ex 1/ ft'-hf:l /J v/~
. R e./l, UIr-e- (z U i:"c;., f eX/ eX L ~.:?./ r;,Cr
/
@ '1J#7. 6v 966, U
pl?tLL '1 /1" c-), C 1C4// J
Zu X 'l/J( ,r l.(Ztl, C/o
5'./ -fz,.'1./ @ (2,.U
, I C/ yth_.. lvf/i'4/ {,I, II~cJ ./
Z vb {/
, II/i.< yet/' ./l/l @ ? ./0 2Jv, VI..;>
['I \?'3C;"" /
. _.._~- ...-
. Tf/?rcJ. +UfJ R e }1, ovc-,( b)7 (0 wi-] eJ-'
- --.. -, . --- --...
.(U=F.=~~: to; d-=~~-=~==~ -.- - .
~----~-- ----------,,- .~~....._.._--- - .------._-~--- -----~--~~....._--~-~----.- --.-. -_._-_._-
I
---- i __ ____.___.~_,_..~____._ '___ ______ __ ___..___~._ _._____________ ---______0 ~ .___._________._.___.__
I
-...-- I ---.---
Proposal No,
Page No,
Date
L
WORK !O BE PERFORMED AT. t2
~~::tt:n~ ~~ :l1u ~~V~
City Date of Plans ~ - ,;) >? - '7 _2..--
Telephone Architect I
!
~ ~) i. "/7PJ'}
/ 3C:,(J, L/} C)
)..,)~ -:;;;0,- 00
All material is guaranteed to be as specified, and the above work to be performed in accordance with the drawings and
specifications submitted for above work and completed in a substantial workmanlike manner for the sum of
I o II $ ;;L / '() I with payme ts to be made as follows:
oars ( / I ('J () ),
Any alteration or deviation from above specifications involving extra costs, will be executed only upon written orders. and will
become an extra charge over and above the estimate. All agreements contingent upon strikes, accidents or delays beyond our
control. Owner to carry fire, tornado and other necessary insurance upon above work. Workmen's Compensation and Public
Liability Insurance on above work to be taken out by r
Respectfully submitted
Per
NOTE - This proposal may be withdrawn by us if not accepted within & () days
~~f~!, >&. ~p",,-:_j"::~.~"'~i';'-~.~\;~?_~;;_:!i,:.><.;':~~1t...~1~r'-';~~;~~i~..';!
, G , " Ii R OBQS l~ ~Wf%"\lr %~. .~~'_
" .... 0 '-~;'.'~~i<J"-::'~~.,~_: -<~""'k;K'iif~~'f- -:,,~;,:.._,.,. .- ~;~~;.,
The above prices, specifications and conditions ar~ satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work
as specified, Payment will be made as outlined above,
Signature
Signature
6\. Form II 23-181
Jro.poBul Page No. of Pages
,
DES1GNfBUILD
GUDMUNSEN DESIGN & BUILDERS
1405 Silver LakG Road, Suite B-2
NEW BRIGHTON, MINNESOTA 55112
. (612) 636.8464
PROPOSA.LSUElMITTEO TO PHONE DATE
STREET JOB NAME
CITY. STATE and 21P CQDE JOll LOC^TION
ARCHITECT ATE OF PLANS JOEl PHONE
lIlIr Wrapn"r hereby to lurnish malerial and labor - complete in accordance with specilleations below, for the su.m 01:
dollars ($ ') , ?/,O 00 ),
Payment 10 be made as follows:
All malarial Is guaranteed 10 be sa specllled. All work 10 be compl"tad In.. workmanlike
manner according 10 alandard practices. Any 8110,allon or dev~llon (,om speclflcallone be-
low Involving exlre co.le will be exaculsd only upon wllllen orders, and will become en
axlrecherge ovarand above Ihe aallm'le. Allag,O'omont. conUngenl upon slrlkos, accl.
dents or d~l~ys b~yond Our conlrol, OWI\~r 10 carry tlra, t"[n~do Bnd olhor neoass.ry 30 days.
Insurance. Our WOf~e" are lully covered by Wor~men." Compensallon Insulanoo.
We hereby submit spacilicatlons and eslimalas for:
PROJECT: Regrade 'dri veway from existing concrete garage apron to
new concrete approach at street.
Sketches are a part of this proposal:
. Remove 2 - trees south side of driveway to be replanted after proper
grade has been established.
Remove approx. 60 yards of excess dirt from street to existing
concrete apron.
Contour north and south side of lawn to blend into new driveway
grade, Remove approx. 80 yards.
Install Allan Block retaining wall around existing tree to minimize I
damage to tree and removal of existing soils.
i
Place 4" of Class #5 base on driveway and grade. I
Place 3" of top soil and sod north and south side of drive way
approx. 160 yards. (wa t ering of sod to be by owner. )
All excess dirt to be removed from site.
Removable of existing bituminous to be done by others.
. Arrrptunrr of JrnpolIul- The above pric;es, spacillcations I
and condlUons ara satisfactory and are llerebyaccepted. Youara authorized Signature
to do Ill", work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. )
Dale of Ac.;;eplanCe: Slgnaturo
~ORM ~\6.~ ~..il.ble I,om f!iJ!ffj)1"C. CrOIO" M....IIl1l
, J;lMU
PARKING AGREEMENT
. This Agreement is made this day of , 1992,
by and among Peter Ngo and Ich Hoang (collectively, the "Landlord")
and Theodore S. Brausen (the "Tenant").
RECITALS
1. Landlord is the owner of the real property in Ramsey
County, Minnesota, located at 1310 West County Road E in the city
of' Arden Hills, Minnesota, containing the Great Lake Restaurant,
and shown on Exhibit A attached hereto (the "Restaurant Property") .
2. Tenant is the owner of the Amoco filling station located
at 1306 West County Road E, Arden Hills, Minnesota, immediately
adjacent to the Restaurant Property on the north (the "Amoco
Property").
3. Landlord and Tenant would like to memorialize their
agreement regarding the leasing of twenty (20) parking spaces on
the Restaurant Property.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises set
forth herein and other good and valuable consideration, the parties
hereby agree as follows:
. 1. Lease of Parkinq Space. Landlord hereby leases to Tenant
for the term and upon the conditions herein provided, the twenty
(20) open-air, surface parking spaces shown cross-hatched on the
attached Exhibit A (the "Parking Area").
2. Rental. Tenant agrees to pay Landlord as rent, in
advance, on or before the first day of each month during the term
of this Lease, without demand, $150.00, commencing August 1, 1992.
3. Access to Parkinq Area. Tenant, its agents, employees
and licensee shall have the right to use the accesses and private
driveways on the Restaurant Property for vehicle and pedestrian
access to and from the Parking Area.
4. Term. The term of this Agreement shall commence August
1, 1992 and shall terminate July 31, 1994. Upon expiration of the
term, this Agreement shall continue on a month-to-month basis, and
either party may thereafter terminate this Agreement upon thirty
(30) days' written notice.
5. Use of Parkinq Spaces. Tenant agrees to use the Parking
Area solely for parking for employees and for cars being serviced
at the Amoco station located on the Amoco Property. Tenant agrees
not to use or occupy any portion of the parking area for any
unlawful purpose.
. 6. Insurance. Tenant agrees to maintain liability insurance
covering its activities in the Parking Area in the amount of at
least $500,000 combined single limit coverage.
-- -------
. 7. Miscellaneous. This Agreement sets forth the entire
agreement between the parties and supersedes all prior
negotiations, discussions, representations, understandings and
agreements between the parties with regard to its contents. This
Agreement may be amended only by the written agreement of all the
parties hereto. This Agreement shall be governed by Minnesota law.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement
as of the date first set forth above.
.
Peter Ngo
Ich Hoang
Theodore S. Brausen
.
This Instrument Drafted By:
Leonard, street and Deinard (SCM)
150 South Fifth Street, suite 2300
Minneapolis, MN 55402
.
scm\amoco\parking.agt 2
.
0
a ;0
l'J m
>! (f)
~ r --j
m :>>
" ;0
,. ~ :>>
~ " c
~ z
--j
Ul -U
"
:> :>>
f;\ ;0
'"
Ul -
I; z
C)
0 ~
-
:>>
C) ~
;0
:>>
. ~
ID ~
~
w~~ ~ (0
",m'"
m""t)C;
Ul>es
;;'''' ~ 0
!i;i:io
;r;.~EJ 0
z - "
-<U1z
,,> @
Ul>z
moO
:>mm <3
~"l1~ €>
om
"'~
m;;;
:>m
Q'"
.
-,-
.' , ,
" I'
C, c..\jlcctl.
ARDEN HILLS CITY OOUNCIL MEETING
OOUNCIL CHl\MBERB
~Y, JULY 13, 1992, 7:30 P.M.
.
1- CALL ID ORDER/ROLL CALL. 7:30 P.M.
2. AGENDA AJX)PI'ION
3. APPROVAL OF JUNE 29 <XlUNCIL MINUI'ES
4. cpNSENT CALENDAR oK-
. Adopt Res. No. 92-46 Relating to Reapportionment of Assessments
Relating to Iroprovement No. 91-BITOIAY (1991 Bituminous OVerlay).
01- b. Approve Estilnate #1 - 1992 Tiller lane Iroprove.ments.
c. , Approve Pay Estimate #4 for 1991 North Snelling Avenue
Improvements. ~
d. Adopt Ordinance No. 289 Relating to Residential Recycling Fees. 'fL
e. Approve List of Cla:iJns/Payroll.
5. PUBLIC <XJMMENI'S
PUBLIC HEMUNGS:
6. Keithson Pond Assessment Hearing 7:30 p.m. (Continued from June 8,
1992).
7. UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS ~
~ Adopt Ordinance No. 288 Imposing a Development Moratorium. ~-~
. ~ Case No. 92-06; Amend SUP, Amoco oil Company, 1306 West County
, Road E - Amoco. 1lJ..A.
~ Case No. 92-12; Minor SUb:livision/IDt Split, Alpo Pet Foods, 4251
~ Fernwocrl Avenue North.
. Discussion of Draft Interim Use Agreement; Case #92-09; site Plan
Review, What-A-RaCXIUet Sports Club, Dennis Foster.
~ Adopt Res. No. 92-46 Accepting the Bid in the Matter of the 1992
street Cold In-Place Recycling Improvements.
~ Adopt Res. No. 92-47 Establishing Cormnercial/Industrial Assessment
~ Rate for 1992 Cold In-Place Recycling Iroprovements.
. 'Adopt Res. No. 92-48 Determining Assessed Cost of Iroprove.ment and
Ordering Preparation of Proposed Assessment Roll in the Matter of
/ the 1992 street Cold In-Place Recycling Iroprovernents.
. Update of North Snelling Avenue Driveway Issue.
8. <XlUNCIL c:x::ro!IENTS
9. lIDJOURN
JULY MEETINGS A\x;uS]' MEEI'INGS
July 1 - Plarming Conun, 7:30 pm August 5 - Planning Conun, 7:30 pm
July 3 - INDEPENDENCE DAY (HOLIDAY) August 10- Council Mtg, 7:30 pm
July 13- Council Mtg, 7:30 pm August 20- Public Sfty/Wks, 7:30 pm
July 16- Public SftyfWks, 7:30 pm August 25- Park & Reo Conun, 7:30 pm
. July 20- Council Worksession, 4:30 pm August 27- Finance Conun, 7:30 pm
July 23- Finance Conun, 7: 30 pm August 31- Council Mtg, 7:30 pm
July 27- Council Mtg, 7:30 pm
July 28- Park & Reo Conun, 7:30 pm
,,-
, . "
.
MINUTES
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
June 29, 1992
7:30 P.M. - City Hall
CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
Note Council met at 6:30 p,m. with the architect to discuss
new City Hall plans.
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor sather called
to order the regular City Council meeting at 7:30 p.m.
Present: Mayor Thomas Sather; Councilmembers JoAnn Growe,
Dale Hicks, Paul Malone, Council absent: Thomas Mahowald.
Also present were: City Engineer, Mark Graham; Public Works
Superintendent, Dan Winkel; Acting Clerk Administrator,
Catherine Iago; Recording Secretary, Foster,
ADOPT AGENDA
With regard to agenda item BC "Discussion on Site Plan
. Review Application - Dennis Foster", Counci 1 agreed to a
request from the applicant's attorney to postpone that item
until the July 13, 1992 Council meeting,
MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Hicks, to adopt the June 29,
1992 agenda excluding item SC, Motion carried
unanimously (4-0),
AP~ROVAL OF COUNCIL MINUTES
With regard to "Budget Information" on page 16 of the June
B, 1992 Council minutes, Councilmember Malone requested the
second paragraph be revised to read that he was "satisfied
with the completeness of the report provided by Mr. Post",
MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Growe, to approve the minutes
of the June S, 1992 Regular Council Meeting as
prepared. Motion carried unanimously (4-0).
CONSENT_G~LENDAR
MOTION: Hicks moved, seconded by Growe to approve the Consent
Calendar and authorize execution of all necessary
documents contained therein. Motion carried
unanimously (4-0) .
. a. Approve Final Estimate (Pay Estimate #1) - 1992
Bike Trail Improvements.
b. Adopt Resolution No. 92-43 Pot-O-Gold Bingo Hall
Application License,
-- -----...-
, , .
Arden Hills Council 2 June 29, 1992 .
c. Acknowledge Receipt of Recruitment Procedures and
Authorize Expenditure to The Brimeyer Group,
Inc, - City Administrator Recruitment.
d, Acknowledge Trade Name and Corporate officer
Changes for On-Sale Licensee, Minneapolis Motel
Enterprises, Inc, / dba Ramada Inn.
e, Authorize Hiring Replacement Seasonal Employees.
f. Approve List of Claims/payroll.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
IMPROVEMENT HEARING FOR ARDEN PLACE
Mayor Sather opened the meeting at 7:36 p,m. for the purpose
of conducting a public hearing on Arden place Drainage
Improvement. Acting Clerk Administrator Iago verified
publication of the notice of hearing in the New Brighton
Bulletin on Wednesday, June 17 and 24, and mail ing to
affected property owners on June 17, 1992 , .
City Engineer Graham reported that in September, 1991, a
feasibility study and plans and specifications were prepared
to replace an existing drainage pipe that extends from the
low area behind 1553 Arden place to the south across Arden
Place, and between 1540 and 1548 Arden Place, He added that
the cost of the project was estimated at $20,800 (incl uding
the lowest construction bid of $16,675 and 25% overhead) ,
He commented that the existing pipe does not appear to be
placed within an easement, but it may be legally possible to
claim a prescriptive easement so no easement acquisition
costs would apply,
Graham stated that questions were raised during october 1991
public hearings on this project relative to easements,
placement of the pipe, cost, and water quality; which led to
further research of alternative options to address this
drainage issue.
Graham explained a second option is to install a pipe to the
Lake Johanna Beach Club property, at an estimated cost of
$30,000, This option would cost more than the original
option primarily due to the need for additional length of
pipe. Easement acquisition costs are unknown but Graham
expected a minimal cost, .
Graham's preference was the original option of a direct
route to Lake Johanna.
. ...
. Arden Hills Council 3 June 29, 1992
The following public comments/questions were received:
Deb Thornton, 3510 Siems Court: My neighbors and I will
fi le a case in District Court if we are assessed on the
basis that we are receiving no benefit and no increased
market value, This problem is between the City and the two
homeowners who are experiencing water problems. An
appraiser would agree that neighbors receive no benefit and
therefore cannot be assessed.
Mayor Sather reminded the public that this evening's meeting
is to receive input with regard to the project itself , that
assessment concerns will be addressed at a later assessment
hearing, if such a hearing is necessary.
Arnold Lindberg, 3520 Siems Court: I concur with Ms.
Thornton. The option of routing to Lake Johanna Beach club
has merit. The option of a direct route to Lake Johanna
involves easement and ecological concerns. Whil e there is a
definite need to address the drainage issue, my contention
is that it is the City's problem and should be a paid for by
the City. I will fight an assessment,
. Esther Dant, 3511 Ridgewood Road: I concur with Ms,
Thornton. When our neighborhood was developed I was of the
understanding that the existing pipe simply needed cleaning,
The City is responsible to pay the cost of addressing the
issue.
Brad Lis, 1548 Arden place: Will my property value be
raised? There is no existing easement through my property
if the direct route to Lake Johanna is used. Has Rice
Creek watershed District approved the direct route option?
I would like to see their study. Because of fertilizer run-
off, etc, the channel to Lake Johanna will turn into a swamp
if the direct route option is used.
Engineer Graham reported that in discussions with Rice Creek
Watershed District they indicated acceptance of the direct
route option; they do have studies available to the public
as to the effect of fertilizers on water supplies.
Dale Noyed, 3505 Ridgewood Road: Why has the cost of the
original option increased? The existing pipe does drain
somewhat. Why not just cl ean it out? Since the existing
pipe has been in place for years wouldn't the City pick up
the costs now?
. Mayor sather stated that, generally speaking, the City's
assessment policy includes a cost sharing procedure whereby
the City typically pays a sizable portion of costs.
However, the Council has not deliberated as to how the costs
-- ---.-.---- --.-----
". .
Arden Hills Council 4 June 29, 1992 .
of this project will be handled.
Engineer Graham and Public Works Superintendent Winkel
reported that the City has attempted to unplug the existing
pipe several times and believe that the pipe is of different
sizes and is possibly broken somewhere which magnifies the
problem. Also it is thought that the existing pipe would
simply plug again in the future, so a permanent solution is
necessary. Graham said the costs discussed at 1 ast fall's
public hearing were estimates for construction only,
John Lundgren, 3487 Ridgewood Road: Assuming the direct
route option is used, could the path of the pipe be shifted
somewhat to reduce its effect on my property and potential
tree loss?
Engineer Graham said estimated costs do take tree loss into
consideration,
John Halvorsen, 3517 Ridgewood Road: How is benefi t
determined?
Engineer Graham stated that an appraiser determines benefi t , .
He added that notice of this hearing was sent to all
properties which potentially contribute to the drainage
problem, that simply being invited to this meeting does not
imply a potential assessment, that potentially assessable
property owners will be determined at a 1 at er time.
Deb Thornton, 3510 Siems Court: I am an attorney and my
research indicates that proving benefit is a necessity
before an assessment can be levied. The City has the
responsibility to provide proper drainage.
Councilmember Malone reiterated that the issue of benefit
for each individual lot will be determined at a later time
as part of the assessment hearing process; that the purpose
of this evening's meeting is to discuss the details of the
improvement.
Arnold Lindberg, 3520 Siems Court: Before a decision can be
made as to which option to use, the question of easement
acquisition must be answered.
Engineer Graham stated that it is the City Attorney's
opinion (without a complete study of the issue) that if
there is an existing pipe, there should not be an easement
problem. .
Esther Dant, 3511 Ridgewood Road: I am troubled that the
City allowed continued development of the neighborhood when
it was known that the pipe providing drainage was plugged.
. .
. Arden Hills Council 5 June 29, 1992
Has Arden Hills considered a storm water utility such as
other cities have adopted?
Councilmember Malone stated that Council ~s in the process
of considering a storm water utility, but such a program may
not address this type of situation,
Warren McGuire, 1553 Arden place: We were told when we
purchased our property that the existing pipe drained. We
have done some landscaping to our property and hauled in
some fill which has actually improved the drainage problems
being experienced by at the Noyed property at 3505 Ridgewood
Road, (Dale Noyed nodded in agreement.)
Brad Lis, 1548 Arden place: If the direct route option is
used, I suggest some additional work such as culvert
replacement.
Councilmember Malone asked Graham if placement of the pipe
in the direct route opti on coul d be shifted somewhat.
Engineer Graham said that bends in the pipe create problems,
but minor realignment could be studied, Councilmember Growe
. asked if tree loss could be avoided if the placement were
shifted, Graham said he would check, but reminded Council
that an existing power pole and the limit ed construction
path must also be considered,
Councilmember Malone commented that it is clear the
improvement needs to be done, however, questions relative to
easements using either option must be answered prior to a
decision.
MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Hicks, to:
1) Direct the City Attorney to determine easement
acquisition costs involved in addressing Arden
Place drainage problems using both of the options
out! ined by the City Engineer;
2 ) Report findings to Council for consideration at
the July 20, 1992 Council worksession;
3) continue the Arden place Improvement public
hearing at the July 27, 1992 Council meeting,
Motion carried unanimously (4-0),
Councilmember Malone advised the public that Council's July
20 worksession is an open meeting.
Council recessed briefly and reconvened.
.
. .
Arden Hills Council 6 June 29, 1992 .
{IN'fIJ~!IllilE:ILb.NILNEW BUSINESS
DRIVEWAY RESTORATION AT 4410 NORTH
SNELLING AVENUE - FRANCIS PODLASEK
Francis Podlasek was asked to explain the problems he has
with his driveway. He stated that everything he would say
was included in his letter to the City,
Mr. Podlasek's letter explained that he was dissatisfied
with the steepness of his driveway entrance resulting from
the reconstruction of North Snelling Avenue and appealed to
the City Council for financial reimbursement to reconstruct
his driveway and yard to conform with the new, lower
elevation road in front of his house,
Engineer Graham advised that through the process of speaking
with residents before the reconstruction project began, he
discussed with Mr. Podlasek the options available within the
project to address his driveway, Graham reported that he
proposed to Mr. Podlasek extending the bituminous patching
up his driveway to a point 40 feet from the road in an
effort to create a gradual slope to the road; however, Mr. .
Podlasek rejected that option and directed Graham to replace
blacktop only to the easement line with a slope not to
exceed 10%.
Graham added that after construction was completed per Mr,
Podlasek's direction and conforming to standards, Mr.
Podlasek expressed his dissa ti s facti on, Graham responded by
letter, and Mr. Podlasek's response was directed to the
Council.
Councilmember Malone stated he has viewed the driveway. He
asked Graham if elevations of the road change after a
project such as this, and who lS responsible to address
that, Graham said that in many instances elevations do
change and driveways must be adjusted, that typically the
adjustment takes place within the right-of-way. He added
that the elevation change in this instance was minimal, but
apparently Mr, Podlasek disagrees, and the 40 foot driveway
cut was offered to reduce the severity of the slope of the
dri veway, but Mr, Podlasek declined, Graham said every
reasonable attempt was made to avoid this problem.
Mr. Podlasek said some driveways affected by this project
were graded well, but he is dissatisfied with his driveway
because the slope at the end of the driveway causes vehicles .
to "bottom out", He emphasized that the old driveway did
not have the severe slope, it was caused by a change in the
elevation of the road. He added that his yard also has a
severe bank which will require landscaping or excavation,
. .
. Arden Hills Council 7 June 29, 1992
Mr. podlasek said he has spoken with contractors as to how
best to address the driveway problem and has been told that
in order to create a constant gradual slope from the garage
slab to the road, fill will need to be excavated, He added
that if he was satisfied with the driveway/road connection,
he could simply repair the old bituminous, but now, because
fi 11 needs to be excavated, he will have to remove the old
bituminous, and will install a concrete driveway. Mr.
Podlasek stated that he only expects the City to share costs
for the removal of the fill, not the cost of new concrete or
old bituminous removal,
Mr. podlasek asked if the City authorizes the City Engineer
to destroy private property and then expect residents to
accept that. Mayor sather reminded Mr, podlasek that the
Engineer offered the 40' driveway cut and asked why that was
not acceptable before the project was done, Mr. Podlasek
said that the 40' idea would not address the need for
landscaping the yard alongside the driveway,
Mr. Podlasek said the problem was created by removing fill
from the roadbed which lowered the elevation of the road,
. Engineer Graham said he did not believe that significant
fill was removed from the road,
Councilmember Hicks commented that he was troubled that Mr.
Podlasek did not accept the 40' driveway cut idea
originally, as it would have been easier and cheaper to have
done that as part of the project rather than trying to
satisfy Mr. Podlasek now,
Councilmember Hicks asked if Graham could calculate the
amount of fill which needs to be excavated from Mr.
podlasek's driveway to meet the grade that Mr, Podlasek
wants, Graham said he could calculate that amount. Hicks
added that excavation would need to accommodate the base
layer and concrete to be laid on the driveway, which would
amount to about six inches. Mr, podlasek agreed,
MOTION: Hicks moved, seconded by Malone, to direct the City
Engineer to calculate and report to Council the cost to
excavate Mr, podlasek's driveway to 6" below a constant
gradual slope from the garage slab to the driveway
apron, Motion carried unanimously (4-0).
CHARITABLE GAMBLING REGULATIONS
REVIEW/RECOMMENDATIONS
. Temporary Accountant Post reported that as directed by
Council on June 15, he reviewed charitable gambling
regulations, talked with the City Attorney, and recommends:
- Mandating 100% compliance with the present 10% net
--.--.---
. '
Arden Hills counci I 8 June 29, 1992 .
profit contribution requirement retroactive to 1/1/92;
Counci I consider imposing a 1% gambling tax.
- In recognition of state tax burdens, reduce trade area
spending requirements from 50% to 30%
- Initiate the use of a standardized reporting format for
charitable gambling licensees.
Post added that his research revealed that state laws, which
changed after the adoption of the City regulations, make the
City regulations somewhat unrealistic. He added that
definitions of gross profit, net profit, lawful expense,
etc. must be clearly understood by all licensees.
Mayor Sather suggested discussing this issue at the upcoming
worksession, He added that the original intent of the 50%
trade area spending requirement was to encourage 1 oca 1
benefit from charitable gambling. Councilmember Malone
clarified that current City regulations, when practically
applied, simply don't "work" any longer because of the
financial effect of increased state burden on licensees,
Temporary ACCountant Post advised that an informal meeting
has been scheduled for July 10, the purpose of which is to .
receive input from charitable gambling licensees. Council
agreed to revisit this issue at the ,Jul y 20 worksession.
~ISCUSSION OF SITE_RLAN REVIEW
APPLICATION - DENNIS FOSTER
Per request from Dennis Fost.er's attorney, Thomas Balyk,
this agenda item was moved to the July 13, 1992 regular
Council agenda.
COUNCIL CO~ENTS
WORKSESSION SCHEDULING
MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Growe, to schedule a Council
worksession On July 20, 1992 at 4:30 p.m. Moti on
carried unanimously (4-0).
KEITHSON POND
Councilmember Hicks thanked Councilmember Malone for
summarizing the Keithson Pond issue for communication to
residents.
DEFEASANCE OF 1985 BaNDS .
Temporary Accountant Post updated Counci 1 with regard to
defeasance of 1985 bonds and stated that the Finance
Committee has studied this issue and provided
. . .
. Arden Hills Council 9 June 29, 1992
recommendations. Councilmember Malone explained why it
makes economic sense to pay off these bonds.
SHARED SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS
Councilmember Malone commented that if shared services
communications is still being considered, Arden Hills must
express concern for the potential substantial increased
costs. Acting Clerk Administrator Iago and Public Works
Superintendent Winkel said latest information indicates
shared services communication is unlikely to occur, They
said they would keep Council advised on this issue,
ENGINEER/RESIDENT COMMUNICATION
Public Works Superintendent Winkel reported that, contrary
to this evening's agenda item regarding Mr. Podlasek's
driveway, MSA does an outstanding job of communicating with
residents and the City on construction projects.
ADJOURN
. MOTION: Growe moved, seconded by Malone, to adjourn the meeting
at 10: 40 p.m. Motion carried unanimously (4-0) .
Thomas R, Sather, Mayor Catherine J, Iago, Deputy Clerk
NOTICE OF MEETINGS:
The next regular Council meet ing will be held July 13, 1992 at
7:30 p ,m. at City Hall.
The next Council worksession will be held July 20, 1992 at 4:30
p,m,
.
"..,
J
, ....
. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
MEZGANOOM
Dl\TE: July 2, 1992
TO: Mayor and city council
Catherine J. Iago, Acting Clerk 1\dmini.strator cJ
FRCH:
SUBJECT: P....rP"rtiomnent of Improvement No. 91-BITOIAY (1991
Bituminous O\Terlay)
'!he attached resolution relates to the reapportionment of assessments
for the property l=ated at 1419 Arden Place.
ACITON RIDUIRED:
'Ihis is a standard reapportionment resolution and a routine b..1siness
item, therefore, Council should adopt Resolution No. 92-46 Relating to
Reapportiornnent of Assessments Relating to Improvement No. 91-BrroIAY
(1991 Bituminous OVerlay) .
CJI/ts
. Attachments
.
,
. CITY OF ARDEN HILIB
RAMSEY CXJUNl'Y
RESOLUTICtl' ro. 92-46
RESOLUTICtl' RELATING TO ~ClNMENl' OF 1lSSESSMENl'S REL1ITING
TO :DIPRO'lEMENr ro. 91-BrroLAY (1991 B:rTllMIIDUS OVERlAy)
WHEREl\B, the assessment roll for Improvement No. 91-BI'IDIAY was filed and
certified to the County Auditor of Ramsey County on
, for the purpose of including install1nents thereof to be collected along with
real estate taxes carmnencing in 1992 i and
WHEREl\B, since that date a mnnber of parcel of property contained with said
assessment roll have been divided and conveyed by previous property owners i
and
WHEREl\B, the County Auditor of Ramsey County requires that apportionment of
the original assessment against each original tract where it has later been
divided, sold or conveyed, be made by the City Council of the City of Arden
Hills in order that the proper assessment can be extended by the County
Auditor against each parcel of property thereafter, commencing with an
assessment to be collected in the year 1992 and thereafter.
N:lW, TIIDU!:FCIm, BE IT RESOLVED, by the city Council of the city of Arden Hills
. does hereby make the follONing apportionment or original assessments as
contained in said assessment roll of , 1992, against the
follONing described property:
RFSOImION NO. 92-46 Division No. 63771
NAME OF ASSESSMENT: Improvement 91-BI'IDIAY DIP No. 6136
Auditor No. 6136
ORIGINAL PIN TOTAL ASSESSMENT
A. 34-30-23-21-0019-6 $ 0.00
B. 34-30-23-21-0020-6 141. 45
REAPPORI'IONMENr
A. 34-30-23-21-0069-1 $ 0.00
B. 34-30-23-21-0070-1 145.45
PASSED AND AOOZ"UID BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS THIS 13TH
D1l.Y OF JULy, 1992.
Thomas R. Sather, Mayor
A'lTFSI':
.
catherine J. Iago, Acting Clerk Administrator
.
. CONSULTING ENGINEERS
Maier Stewart & Associates Inc.
June 2, 1992
File No: 520-000-90
Ms. Cathy Iago
Acting Clerk - Administrator
City of Arden Hills
1450 W. Highway 96
Arden Hills, MN 55112
.RE: ASSESSMENT REAPPORTIONMENT
DIVISION UDA 063771
Dear Ms. Iago:
Please find enclosed the adjusted assessments for the above referenced reapportionment. Call me
. if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
MAIER STEWAIIT AND ASSOCIATES, INC,
4~yf'~ -
Mark J. Graham, P,E,
MJG/ks
enc.
000-020 UUN
.
1959 SLOAN PLACE, SUITE 200, ST, PAUL, MINNESOTA 55117 512-774-6021
9800 SHELARD PARKWAY, SUITE 102, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55441 612-546-0432 . Equal Opportunity Employer
, ,
. REAPPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA DIVISION NO. DA 063771
RESOLUTION NO. 46 DIP NO. 6136
NAME OF
ASSESSMENT 9l-BITOLAY (1991 Bituminous AUDITOR'S NO, 6136
Overlay)
ORIGINAL PIN NUMBER TOTAL ASSESSMENT
A. 34-30-23-21-0019-6 $ 0.00
B. 34-30-23-21-0020-6 $ 141. 45
C. $
D. $
E. $
F. $
. G. $
REAPPORTIONMENT
A. 34-30-23-21-0069-1 $ 0.00
B. 34-30-23-21-0070-1 $ 141.45
C. $
D. $
E. $
F. $
G. $
.
.... --.-..-- .
ARDm IULL8 CITY 0CllJH::lL MEE:'I'l:m
~ c::II1lMBER8
~, JULY 13, 1992, 7:30 P.M.
1. CALL 'lD ORDER/OOLL CALL. 7:30 P.M.
2. AGENDA AOOPrION
3. APPROVAL OF JUNE 29 COUNCIL MINUI'FS
4. CONSENT CALENDAR
a. Adopt Res. No. 92-46 Relating to Reapportiorunent of Assessments
Relating to Improvement No. 91-BTIOIAY (1991 Bituminous OVerlay).
b. Approve Estilnate #1 - 1992 Tiller Lane Improvements.
c. , Approve Pay Estimate #4 for 1991 North snelling Avenue
Improvements .
d. Adopt Ordinance No. 289 Relating to Residential Recycling Fees.
e. Approve List of Claims/Payroll.
5. PUBLIC c:n1MENTS
PUBLIC IIE!IRIR;S:
6. Keithson Porn Assessment Hearing 7: 30 p.m. (Continued fram June 8,
1992).
7. UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS
A. Adopt Ordinance No. 288 Imposing a Development MoratoriUlll.
B. Case No. 92-06; Amend SUP, Amoco oil Corrpmy, 1306 West County
Road E - Amoco.
C. Case No. 92-12; Minor SUl:xlivision/Lot Split, Alpo Pet Foods, 4251
Fernwood Avenue North.
D. Discussion of Draft Interim Use Agreement; Case #92-09; site Plan
Review, What-A-Raoquet Sports Club, Dennis Foster.
E. Adopt Res. No. 92-46 Accepting the Bid in the Matter of the 1992
street Cold In-Place Recycling Improvements.
F. Adopt Res. No. 92-47 Establishing Camnercial/Industrial Assessment
Rate for 1992 Cold In-Place Recycling Improvements.
G. ' Adopt Res. No. 92-48 Determining Assessed Cost of Improvement and
Ordering Preparation of Proposed Assessment Roll in the Matter of
.H. the 1992 street Cold In-Place Recycling rovements.
Update of North snelling Avenue Driveway ....sue.
8. COUNCIL cu-lMENTS
9. AlllOURN
JULY MEEI'INGS AU3USI' MEEI'INGS
..
July 1 - Planning Corran, 7:30 pm August 5 - Planning Corran, 7:30 pm
July 3 - INDEPENDENCE DAY (HOLIDAY) August 10- Council Mtg, 7:30 pm
July 13- Council Mtg, 7:30 pm August 20- Public Sfty/Wks, 7:30 pm
July 16- Public Sfty/Wks, 7:30 pm August 25- Park & Roc Corran, 7:30 pm
July 20- Council Worksession, 4:30 pm August 27- Finance Comm, 7:30 pm
July 23- Finance Corran, 7:30 pm August 31- Council Mtg, 7:30 pm
July 27- Council Mtg, 7:30 pm
July 28- Park & Roc Comm, 7:30 pm
. ...
, ,~" " ..'".'~ -,
--
"'
i
,
".
'., u{) ,- "
lU l~
'" j .'~
'1--i
, ,
C:l <() ;".. ,--
, c :>"
'.
"'
"]',
" "
': ~ .,..J
',G :J:
.1) ;..~
'"
, ,j
J I
t ->:
en
...
... ..
- .. .
::c ...
Ul
21.D~
....
w>..
C""
a:3:z
<~::;
:!: -
III
11.,.. ...
Dill::!
Ill:!:
>3:z
t-ow
..c
-"0:
u....
~
. .
. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
MEXIlANDUM
DATE: July 10, 1992
TO: Mayor and City CoImcil
FRa!:: Tery Shields, Mmin. secretary 1J
fltlll.:Jrer : Pay Estimates for 1992 Tiller Lane and 1992 North
Snellin;J Avenue street ~ts
Attached are the follCMing for your review and =nsideration:
1., Letter dated July 7, 1992, from Engineer Graham regarding
Pay Estimate No.1 for the 1992 Tiller lime Inproveroents in
the amount of $48,739.98 to F.M. Frattalone, Inc.
2. Letter dated July 9, 1992, from Engineer Graham regarding
Pay Estimate No. 4 for the 1991 North Snelling Avenue street
Inproveroents in the anount of $63,198.73 to Midwest Asphalt,
Inc.
. REm1MENDATION:
staff recammencls approval of the Pay Estimates described above.
ACI'ION RIDUIRED:
If Council =ncurs, Council should make a motion under Consent to
approve Pay Estimate No. 1 for the 1992 Tiller Lane Inproveroents in the
amount of $48,739.98 to F.M. Frattalone, Inc. and Pay Estimate No.4 for
the 1991 North Snelling Avenue street Inprovements in the anount of
$63,198.73 to Midwest Asphalt, Inc.
Attachments
r
t
~
~
. ,
~
I
"
~,
i
'7
~:
, ,
. CONSULTING ENGINEERS
Maier Stewart & Associates Inc.
July 7, 1992
File No: 520-028-30
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Arden Hills
1450 W. Highway 96
Arden Hills, MN 55112
RE: PAY ESTIMATE NO. I
1992 TILLER LANE IMPROVEMENTS
Dear Council Members:
Please find enclosed three copies of Pay Estimate #1, in the amount of $48,739.98, for the above
referenced project. P.M. Frattalone, Inc. has completed work in the amount of $51,305,24, with
retainage in the amount of $2,565.26 withheld from payment.
. We respectfully recommend payment of Pay Estimate #1, in the amount of $48,739.98, to P.M.
Frattalone, Inc., for this project. We will be in attendance at your July 13, 1992 City Council
meeting if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
MAIER STEWART AND ASSOCIATES, me.
/1fad 4~
Mark J. Graham, P.E.
MJG/ks
enc.
028-0701.JUL
.
1959 SLOAN PLACE, SUITE 200, ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55117 612-774-6021
9800 SHELARD PARKWAY, SUITE 102, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55441 612-546-0432 . Equal Opportunity Employer
,
,.
. - . - __.. ..... _.._ .. - __n __~
IRKiJAL r~!RtN: ~j!!AAit
------------------------
::iirr~. _U:~i'~:
". ~,... .-.".,"-
:~:; -,:IiuYl.
--..--.---- F,~> FRATTAL0NE, INS,
,",..,,,.,,.,..,,,.
, ",., ~~, ".-.
,.",." ,.,'.-, ~'"'
HI"',". CF! D: ~;:l~~N HE~:,
FF{u.JET; TILLER LANE B}Rf~i IHPRDVf~ENTS i~20-~~~'
CHPLETlnN liAE snUUN: GF CDNTRBCT
OR]{;INAL: AUtU')~ '!', ji'i2 U~;: L'lNEl..; '!~~:,~~:~.. i'"
Rt:\.iEtL'; t:i:V1Jcii; 0.....:1
nCil C8t~FACT j E~S THIS PH; l[i [, JOEL T~ Nj)t
'I;"',;
, '
, ,
__ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ _ _ _ _ _ _________ _ _ _ _ _ _____ _____________ ___ ____ ~ _ _ ____ ________________ _ ____ ___. _ _ __. ~ w ~ ~ ____ _~ .__ _ ____ __ ___ _______________ __ _ _ _ ____
Nu. [iESeRIPTH1}i ;UNlT gUt!~nIF UNII ;QUiiNTITY ~f,(;UNT TuTALIPERluD ~~UHNTITl AIWUNT TOT f,LiTl)[i~TE
nICE
___________________________________i________~__________________:______________________________________i_________________________~_____________
SCHEDULE 1.0 SEEET I~PRnE~tfJTS
------------------------------
i RE~, ~ITu~INuUS SURFACINE :;; %DO v,!,} 9427 6 ~,y t!. "'tJ - t:(i':J:.'i".;
2 [ufl~GN fXCAVATIBN 166D 4.>0 /,jU }2~5 ,~(l ;',)'.! "' .-", ~ ...,!,
'" ~,i0.I,',"~
J SUR~K~~E EXCAVRTluN ~,f, b 0 .. .., C,C,C.: H\:li,J~! c,~,.-,r 1 i};} j i'. ~,(j
"i,)t' ;:i.i,;
. 4 SELECT GR~NULAK BuxP.u~ .','J 5(;6(1 0.<N ~22~ U3~:O,t[} '~"~!':' t. 133~<O.N)
l! ~~,,-.'
~ .p DRRH~ TILE L ~ jOiiO ..,,' 84 147,Otl 0~ 1~7. no
b Su~GR~DE PREPARHTIGN ~:D~T A ";.4 i",fi{; 1 ~.7 0Ui , ~;ij ~" . 802.50
j CL, :' AGGREGRTE ~HSE j;'i '.",Pi b. :,,~ 112B.36 i ~;j~, j4 lid,~'c. /.\)"I..!"!
f; ~'J31 TYPE 3) BiT. BASE CDU~:SE OJ 12;i(! 19 . ~~ (! .. \I ,'J',! - i,!,Hi
92331 ];(: ~j BiT, ~E~R CDURSE TN ? ~,[i iLl!] ~.% , tJ,%
if; T~CX COAl GAL !!d, ; ~,t ([ " " " ;;;,
,~ ~.i '} !.L,i , ,
11 CDNC. CURB & B~TTER E61B lf :':'LU 4 . 7~, li ~. (JU .'1 t. <'f,
v.',','
12 6n C0NC. D!~ P.ESTORAT]DN jj n~ iLtO l' (),(il) {i !, .",.~
13 CuNL SA~H{fi LF 15fi :i.% :j, V~! J 1,%
lq ~r. BIT, D/t RESTGRp,}iDN BY 370 &JJO (: (,.0(: (!.(i(!
1 ~l SUIiliH~B SY 6%(i Lft f) ~, ~{j fi :) {:.f:
16 ~DJUBr ~ANHuLES " 16 2{p},IJO i 2!jO.% 1 20t,ijD
..11
~7 AnJU5T CRTCR ,p,SlNS E, & iv.fi() 0 (\.O(} !} ;).00
18 CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN "^ j i2~O .O~) ;,-....,;.!;;. i~V\!, 'i\!
::y. ii.'J'J.P,1 .
19 12" RC? CLp,SS 111 lf 8 7~,. 00 c ,:;J'j.\!'J c 6\h}.V}
70 ADJUST WBTER ~p,LVES EA j i;:\,'j'. ,< iJ.Ui) v (I,t":'
21 STR~, BH, REPL. CASTINGS ,.... "i 3v~.0;) 0 V,IlV (}.(,(i
22 SUBbRH~E STD, PROCTOR ... , 80,00 (1 0.0>:: {; (:.O{;
23 SUBGRA~E INPLACE nEMSITy tR 16 J:,.')(} 0 (',;:'0 ;;' 1).(\0
24 CLASS 5 liRR~AT!GN fA , 70.iJO " O.';,{i , (J.V'J
25 CLASS ~ PROC1DR r_. 2 jV,iJi] " o.~o 0 ::).0~
Ul ,
1, Cl,SS , INPlACE ~ENS!I! E, 1~ ~ ~.{;(1 (I O.tiD ~\ 0.t1Q
17 CONC. C!llNIER iSEI 0f 3) "fA 1 75.,j~ 0 !).'E: ~! ~.iJ,j
1S ,II. EXIRACTION H 6 S~.(iu () t.D{: " ().M
. 29 lIT. ,RAIATION fA ~ ~lv.M " v,vil , {l.tiO
,
3, SII. CORES INPlACE H ~(f, .Uf, " (\.(i(i 'j O.O[i
- ,
31 lIT. NUCLEAR IENSITl " 2~ 3>j.u(l (! . {i,[iQ (\ 0.[:(1
.,
-------------- ---------------
T SCHEIUlE 1.0 SIREET IIPROVEKENlS--T,j,) tn~S3~.24 $4j~530.2~
iDiAL H! .
. ." n""n..' ,,,;; '''.... ..n... ",n::;,':'..' ";i::,... . '"u"".." ',::::;'. . ,,,,,,;,, .. · "'" 'nn""................ 'm
E:HHULE 2,(} EXTRA ~.j~j >' :_: ':>\' ~~ I)
j
---------------------- ---.--- ; 2%D, i);)
;' ~''j, 'JiJ ; ,-. .I, (.!~'
1 RECONST, C~TCH BAS1N ,-" "'''', r,,;,
;,~"}.'h .1<!'J.-v'.' ~3 :.8':,.,.-;';')
, RECONri0URt CATCH BhSI~ ." 'i:, ""',
1 ~, ~!.;, !.i'! : ".\J',:
3 12' RtP CL8SS 1)1 '. ?~" (:(;
n.;>~' ---------------
4 GROUT MNBDLE ~- -------------- - ;;
" .....,.",
"i
SCHEDULE ~,(' ~),-~,':: ~un--- ,- -
"~. --~.-~
~ ~;L JO~i ,24
.
.
.
.............. .....-..
:::,i E: :.;:.~ c:: r::' 'j c, ..: T ["'i :',; ; :...i j {',; ,,,. ,;"t..." "'I"'C).'-);:.:, i !..
E;C.:H! :'UL,iL.. .',..,.... I )"';F F;'i...:'.../; '.!"'!r" ':i' q :::: " ~:.', :'~ ;" .,::: .;.~ ',,'- U"
,.....,...",...., ,.... (.,'-.iC.1F;:V ...T.::: ;:.':,', .........,.'.
',~,.. ~ ;i:::, .!)U' l::,
THI~:::\ F'[hIfJD .", .",' i tj U::-:j fi...
: \...'if"'jL..
........... ,...... .. -......... ............ .................. ............... . -,_.....- .......-- ..-....-.....-....-..... .."-'. ........ .. .. ...................... ,
. (.:'i l'i~ U \.J h.i T !:::. !~:~ r~ ;\1 r::::U '...'. ........... ...,. "':'.C.
'::i; ~) ,} " ..:;' () ::::; " >: .q. :,'..'.!.. ..::,()
................._............,-".... .,..................;.. ............."'...- .,...-.--..-.........,...............................-....
.",.1..,'!(';1["'," ,_..,......,......,.,.."... ,',"", ,..., ,... ....., .... ".....
'''';r::,ii'':ll'"''.' 'C'.. ..' .. ~.:! t::, :.-., .,: :::: 0...... ....
'~:. ....., ,,! ,-:', ... "
................................................................. ...-.........-...
............._, ,"""'.' ..."'.,...--.. ~\'."
j "iI":; i i: ;"', ; r"; ~ L!f".1 ;:::,J. if:' ,.,
)""'1 Pi T E: h I (:j L. \i 1,1 ,,-"i , ,:.(:.,:)..,.,'j...!. -,...., ...,".
'.,.", ,.,
...........,_.........,....... . "'n................................ .._.._........"...n.
F'F~F:\) I []L..1U j''''] I " "'_ .~'"i''' ~*************~++**~ ':i:;.:") (}()
,..................-......-..."...... _ .................--.-".....-.-..............................-
{\ )-,.) L: tJ 1\] .'j' n L.l I:::: .J.!~j.b,,)'~::;(? '-, ;~';.q. ::::; " ,/.'-: '.:' " ../::::(
......_........._,............._-_......__....._.....__..~-,.._........__...__._--.....--....-- ........"....
.
. -. ---- -~ -- ~-- ----~ ---- - -- --- -- -- ----- ---- - -- --- -- -- - -- --- --- ---- -- - -- ~- -- - -- - ..- ~_.. -. -..-..-
~ - --- - - - -- ~-- ---- - - --- -- ---------- -- - --- ----. -- - --- -~- -- - - -~ --------~ -- -- -- -~ -- -----
'- - ,__ i-., Day Estimate
- lJt:'f'::"L'Y certIT}' that all items and 2.mQunt.s. shown by tlH~. are
cc;r-n~ct for the work completed to date..
CONTRACTOR: F ;Jl,TF' m" lk
T'" '''',''~' 'T'_~'J ,'. ,
"7~~: -- ---~--------~------
"",,' f/;~d ~
'"--. .JZ '.1<,
- ',- ~' ! 'i i
v;;,~, 1;,;(
- ---er-~-------
-------------------------------------~-------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BQsed on the ENGINEER'S on-site inspections as an experienced and qualified
desiqn professional and on review of application Tor paYflient ana the accompanying
data and schedules, the Et-~GINEER has determined~ to the best of fll 5
knowledye and belief~ that the quan ti ties shown hy this estimate aye CCH'TECt
il.nd that'!! based on such inspections and reVIew... t.n2.T. the work has ~.rogr(esseo
to the point. indicated ( subject to an evaluat.ion of such work as a
functioning Project upon Substantial Completion=, tD the r-esul ts of any
. subsequent tests required by the Cont.ract DGCUffients~ and to any qualifications
stated 10 his recommend a tion) :" and that payment cc-f the amount recommended is
is due ContFctctGF(S); but h"y r-ecommendinq arq.- pa!ffient~ the E~fuINEER will
not thE,reby be deemed to have Fe-viewed the means:" methDds~ sequence~-:"
techniqu.es~ or p:r-oceeaun:'s Df con=:,i:.ruction or ~-afe ty pnecauticns Ot- pj--DGrams incidEnt
incident thereto or ....1..-_.1. the ENGHo/EEF: ha~- made any Examination to aSCE-r-tain
Ulct\...
how or- fOT wha t pur-pOSE' an";;, Contt-actor !ias used the monies p-aid on accGunt
-~ the Contract Price~ OF that title tD ant of the work~ materi.alsq or
Ul
equipmEnt has passed to the Owner free and clear of any lein!, claims"
security interests or- encumbF.ances~ DF that the ContractoF(s) have cDmpleted
their work exactly 1n accordance wi th the Contract DDcuments~
ENGINEER: l'lAIER STEWAF:T 8: ASSOCIATES:'l me.
BY, ~~_/~~~~
TITLE:
-----~~-~---~~-------
DATE: _____L-=-I:.:2.?,_
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Approved by Dwner/Commission
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS BY:
------------------------------------
TITLE:
. ------------------------------------
DATE,
------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. ~~-:J ' CONSULTING ENGINEERS
Maier Stewart & Associates Inc.
July 9, 1992
File No: 520-019-30
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Arden Hills
1450 W. Highway 96
Arden Hills, MN 55112
RE: PAY ESTIMA1E NO.4
1991 NOlITH SNELLING AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
Dear Council Members:
Please fmd attached three copies of Pay Estimate #4, in the amount of $63,198.73 for the above
referenced project. This pay estimate represents final quantities for the entire project, as all
punchlist items were successfully completed this week. The final construction cost for this project
was $230,237.91. The contract price, including the necessary change order for additional
. subgrade excavation work was $242,504. This final construction costs represents a reduction of
5.1 % of the contract price. A fifth and fmal pay estimate will be processed to release the
retainage amount of $10,125,20 when the Contractor has submitted all necessary paperwork.
We will be submitting all necessary documentation to the Minnesota Department of Transportation
to close out the State Aid account for this project.
We respectfully recommend payment of Pay Estimate #4, in the amount of $63, 198.73 to Midwest
Asphalt, Inc. for this project.
We will be in attendance at your July 13, 1992 City Council meeting to further discuss this matter.
Sincerely,
MAIER S1EWART AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
/Jf~4~
Mark J. Graham, P.E.
MJG/ks
enc.
. 019-Q901.JUL
1959 SLOAN PLACE, SUITE 200, ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55117 612-774-6021
9800 SHELARD PARKWAY, SUITE 102, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55441 612-546-0432 . Equal Opportunity Employer
. PARTIAL PA1KENT ESTIKATE
------------------------
i ~
FROK: llllbl9!
10, )17111
CONTRmOR: KlliESl ASPHAll, INC,
liNER: ClTl If ARlEN HlllS
PR[iJECl: 1991 NIRlH SNELLING AVENUE IKPRDVEKENTS i511-01ii
COKPlEllON IAlE AKOUNl OF CDNTRACI
ORIGTNAl: blCAlENlARlAYS IRIGINAl: 1!91.29UI
REV1SEI: REVlSEI: 1137.294.01
lTEK : CONlRACl mKS , TH15 PERIOI : TOTAL 10 om
, , ,
----------------------------------.,.------------------------..,.--------------------------------.----,---------------------------------------
NO, IESCRlPlION :UNll OUANTITY UNIT :OUANTllY AlOUNl TOTAL/PERIOD :DUANTITl MlUNI 10TAlIT0lATE
, PRICE : :
-----------------------------______1______------------_________1______________________________________,_______________________________________
, , '
SCHEDULE 1,1 SIREET lKPRIVEKENIS
------------------------------
I REKOVE IITUKINOUS PAVE KENT SI 7111 0.90 0 UO 7827,38 7044.64
2 COKKIN EXCAVATIIN Cl 5411 US 0 0.01 UbUI,26 33419.00
3 SUUGRAOE P[REPARATION RdSl< 19 UUO 0 0.01 28,78 lm.OU
. 4 AGGREGAIE BASE CLASS 5 TN 4751 5.00 49,U3 149,15 7U9U4 39477.10
S lASE COURSE IIX. T1PE 31 TN 1700 16.00 0 1,00 1541.1 8 24674.88
6 iEAR COORSE K1X. T1PE ~l TN 1700 17.90 111 J.U 7 W97,27 lJ1 J.U 7 W97,17
7 BJl, lACX COAT GAL 620 l.l0 580 m,co b2Ul bUU4
U 6' CDNC. DRIVEiAl APRON S1 56 60.00 0 0,00 111.J5 ml.Oo
9 I' BIT. DRIVEiAl APRON S1 300 4.10 200,95 94U) 2OO.9j 94U7
10 CDNC. CUR8 I GUTTER 861U If 6001 UD 30U W9.90 m1.5 2/795.50
11 SOOOlNG-LAiN I IlVD, Sl 7500 2,15 2bl1 j897.15 1611 5B9l.25
12 mDm AC 0,3 5315,00 2.5 mU7.lD 1,5 13187,50
13 ADJUST KANHDLE EA 7 101.00 0 0.00 11 1100.00
14 RECDNSTRUCT KANHOlE LF 5.4 1l1,85 0 0,00 2.4 318,84
15 ADJUST iATER VALVE [A 3 140,00 3 410,00 b 840,00
16 mRANT EXTENSlDN lF U m,oo 1 744.00 3,5 1301,01
17 RETAINING iALL SF bOl IUD m.5 7908.75 m,5 7908.75
IB RELDCATE EX, IAIllDX EA b 30.01 0 0.00 6 180.00
19 REKOVE EX, UARRICADE lS 1 150,00 0 1,01 1 250.01
10 RElIVE EX, 11' CKP LF 14 UO 0 1,00 46 243.UO
21 mOVE EX, ]5' CKP LF 30 5.30 I 0,00 30 159.00
21 SIGNING LS 1 177 5.0 0 1 177 5.00 1 1775.00
13 SIRIP1NG LS 1 m.ID I 115.00 I 715,01
---------~---- ---------------
T SCHEOULE 1.0 STREET mRlvmNTS--lol,1 m,746.19 1102,031,92
SCHEIULE 2,0 STIRK SEiER llPROVEKENTS
--------.---------------------
. I IS' RCP, CLASS III lF lbO 11.15 0 1.10 151 lJJ 1.50
2 24' RCP, CLASS III lF II 18.70 0 1.01 16 451.10
3 30' RCP, CLASS III lF 15 31.90 0, 1,10 16 51G.40
4 3b' X 5B,5' RCP, CLASS 111 LF 15 6U5 0 I,DO 16 1010.10
S IS' ecp FLARED ENI SECIION EA I 4BO.00 0 UO I 4UO.00
6 14' RCP FLARE I ENI SECTION EA I 640.00 1 64UO 1 m.oo
. ;7q CG~iTF:ACT I !E~S ifF PE!':iuD ~,.~" ~ ,. ..,.~
. '" 1.'; ".. ,;~..,
~'''~ .. ~ "''' ~
~------~._--_.._---~-~------------- --------------------------- ----------~---~-----_._~-"'~~-~-------- ---------------------------------------
~.L: . DESCRlnIGN .. ."~ ,".. ..-.-.. . ~ijA;i~;- dF:>':'.:T TG:sLJPERIDD :fURN:~;: A~JLH( ":;~: i: ;"',,: ~
;VL: tiUNjili', U;,j' ,~",~, "'-' " "
T,',! r.~
;,."...
, : ,
-------~---~~--------~------------- --------------------------- ------------ ---------- -------------- ---------------------------------------
- -.-'" .'-." - --.. 'C ,.,.., Ii;.".."
i i.i' L:A i Uf J.i~0l~'i . ('!',.',',",.' .
8 48; ~M~HDLE ,. f, ~,.;!, ';"." ~: , i~'" 11;!'1 iii'
9 [uNSTRUST ~rt GN EX. S'DR~ ~,:,: ;,',""",..,,", ; .::\ " ~ ,.~ ,.,
CDNN. TO EX, SYGRp ~H ;i.i!i; :,':''', (d,
- ~.'- '.". - ~ '." '."
--- -----~---- ---------------
SCHEDULE 2,0 ST0R~ SE~ER I~PRGVEiEN:S--T0tdl ~,~4D ,[~C - ... , ~ '::
,-..,
S[:HDl\LE },(! SMnTWt3E~ER j~?KDVE~HE
------------------------------
i S[!!-!NE[:T Tn EX. S,~NnARY SE~ER -." 2D,()(i 0 ~: , <.: ~: . 430.G")
2 81 8-10' DEEP 1UO ~~, i.- ~ r': (J' S~ \'!~ :i,::-:
3 a= SEER PLUG t-, to;' ~) , i} (i
- ,'J,"'} ,"',,"
4 4; SERViCE PiPE "' 5C' j3,% " o.(,() ,i.(. ,,-' ,~'V
-------------- ~--------------
BCHEDULE 3.0 SANlTHRY SE~ER I~?R8VEHENTS--ToI~1 ~ll. ..IG $2, (i4~" q~
SCHE~~LE ~.o ~ATER ~A}N I~PRDvE~EN1S
------------------------------
1 a' T~PFH1S lEE E 15~~IJ~. I) (: .:: ~ <:r,: '.,'
.i.I:'.,,'}';
2 1; ~HTER SERVICE COHN, di 111),('(\ " {I N. 110,(<\
. 3 8:; ~HTER ~AIN ,: " ~" r,: t,% 10 212, ~,(:
- ~ ..,...,
~ i~ ~~}ER SERvILE LF I:' 1.},',-') ~, [![) " iDi,;)i,)
.L'
~ B; ~?'ER hUB t~: '.i,','i" \i '.;, 'J'~' S;i. D~
-------------- ---------------
SCHEDULE ;,D ~ATER ~~~H I~F~GVE~ENTS.-i0t31 ..",,,, 'L",.".'
SCHEDULE 5,[) CHRNGE 0RDER ND,:
------------------------------
1 iB~ RCP FL~RED tNJ SECTluN t:'! 2 t,OQ.O() (, 0.0~ " HVV,'.i'j
2 27' CATCH BH~IN C' , tor iF. '),ijV , "
, , ':' ~.~, ~"-'
3 15; RCP~ CLASS III if ;) r,; r," \1 " ","; i~ 3 g (~ , (, (i
H' -'i.i,1
~ is" R[P FLHRf~ ENJ SECTIuN t!'i , 4-90.(fV t, , 4BO. O~
." ~v
5 fLEAR1NB AND bRliBBING 1,-. , 2500.v:j {),l,U j 2~I{i~.DO
--------~--~-- ---------------
, SfHEDULE 5.0 CHANGE uxvER NU,l-~jvt~l ~':' ,00 ; ~,Zl(}.i)O
SCHEDULE bot EXT~~ ~DK~
------------------------------
i P-EEHjVE fAitH ~~SIN H 8 ~,[j. (!(f 1 B ~,(i ,(f[J , H~.(). (}O
2 4! PVC DRAIN TiLE lJ ;;'1:: H .~(, ~i f:.J 3E3.20 ~;/~, ,:ilj,j, ~U
J KEn~STALL FHJCE ,r. j 37:,.~J) J7~" ('V l 3j'~. Gu
lJ
4 REPAIR [uNCRE1E APRuN Sf 40 ~.9~ 'lV 198.00 4(\ 1 %, ~u
~ BuULEVARD GRAD!NG LS , 25b,2Q 1 2J~.2~ 1 Zf,f.24
,
-------------- ---~-~---------
, SCHEDULE 6,0 EXTRk ~Ur.~~-Total i4.B12,q4 ~4,8i2.44
,
. $~~~19B,73 S230l237.91
, , .
.
....u..........., d. ..,...., ............. . i',"",,::,"rC'
.i. i" ; ,~. i. j ; ".; . Hi.. .'
"U. .._....... ..........-........ .....,..-. C",-,....
,.., . :;: i"iF'i :(j",jr:::i'lF:
." , , ;',\j;"':i::::'" ! '"
,........'",.......'....-,.., .,'... -'-.'.. -,...
~::)C-: I;:: ::! ~..,:; .. ....r..!F'),...: ~::),,':'(..',iF'i"'. 3.:"i,'-" ,..' ,...'.'-,
.......... .....-. ...,-.. .._-..'. (1(\ .;.. ,." ; ',,,:'.""
'....:;';...'--,.,;, ,... ~::; !..:; ; \).; : !"";'''':
,..........,...-..'...-.,..,.. ....-" ....',....\".."..
':-::;..:;.iF i:>i..Ji i::- i)..,,_., \}-,l(.\,'TC.r:; !':)(:) T;-" :i i''''iF'F.:! ,<.., , "'''.,' It:.,.! ,,:":."
E)l::Hi:Di"J...C '...." '. C:::}..j/-"f!\IC:;E. C)F:L>CH !'.1(:)" ',"" ';'-:,".10" (:.('\
E:C:Hi :,OUL j:-" ..,........... .,.......... .... ..: " ,::./1 ... ,'...
i.f ! 1"-:(:' i}.!!..3!-'<i'" h__. i c:,.t.,:,":,_ "".-.., c' 'T ',.' " .,..,
;'-"r",.:.' .,:..,....!.-',!
.
'TH, T ::::: ;:: F:r;~ I ( :T" ] t--, i (.', ~ .. TCl T>, 'j'T;::'"
(~;'v'1Ut)i') T ;::::{.:iF:j\.;E::::O , '! .:;:-;.::, ,. ..'....n.,'.:'....., ........;/
' ,
.--,,".
;:'.~! j"-l1 Ci l.._< !\i "; ;::;: E::"r (,; .i. ~\iL:.. J.::'-;' :....!::: ..'i\
1'1(~:'T[:r:;::;: (:'ii. C!h! ~~:~I TF: ::<0;'; ~~;. ).., H )
---..-.-,-..----..-------------.....-l- "..-.. .....,.....--... -...--'".---..-....,. ,...,,_....
)-...i .-'\ -~.. .:':. !..', -,' j\ : :Di::;::DLJC: r" .,.. ."
.. ..
,'! :...~ ! I..:, i"\ _,_ r"! L. .v'..-' . -- ..,
..,....". ..
p.----..-..-,..............-.........---.....----.- ...-.......-.--. .--.-. "'...................-...
F' ~:::.: E: :..) I U tJ E~ F' PI \" j"'\ i .: l\l"; ::.:;) :*********t*****Ai~ ... : ~"-.- -::;) ':;' ,::~ ~::~
"".'.'.."..i-,' .....'.. ,.
.-..........-.........--..................... .......,.........".--.-....-..--... .._-". ...--...-.... ...-...--...-.-......-......---...... ,
(.\ l~.i C) LJ ;"'.i'r D LJ E' :;::. ::: . .\. 7C'" ':"'.it;:~:, " ,J "/\::.{" ..'
.-_.... ,..,...,............-..- .......-.."..-...... .............-.-
.
- -.- ......... ~J.O<lt-tI"'<O:' Q< ASSOC. P.06
, , .
~~~~~~~:~~~g~;=;=~=======:~~=;==~=====~~==~=;;~:~;;:===~:==.:=.~=====~=:~==~~~~~~
. 1 hc.,...,Lr ce, t ify that all ite~s ~nd a~ounts shown by this par esti=ate are
correct for the work CQsplctcd to date.
CONH<ACTOR: nIpWEST ASPH~
S'f~ ... l3,
~-- ---- --~-----
TITLE ~ V. P. Grl.~.:fru.JJt/ '
~---------~~-------~~._--~-
DATE: J~ '1 ~'7~
-- ------------~-
~~~=;==~===~;=;:==~;=~=====;=:~~~==~=~~=========~=~=;:.===;~=;==~====c~~==~====:
Based on the ENGINEER'S on-Site znspections as,an experienced and qualified
dcsi9n prQfe~sional and on review of application for paYMent and the accompanrinq
data and SChedules, the ENslNEER has dcter~ined, to the best of his
knowl~dge and belie~, that th~ quantities shown by this esti.ate ~re correct
and tl1at. basc>d on stich inspections and "CVi(>ld, that tile work has proqressed
to the pOint indicated (stl~ject to an eyaluation Of such work as a
fUflctioninq Project Upon Substantial Completion, to the results 01 any
sub~equent tC$ts required br tl10 Contract Docu.ents, and to any qualifications
. 5t~tcd in his reCOJIIJllcndation), and that piYJII~nt of the a"'ount reco...ended is
is due Contractor(s); but ~y reco.m~ndinq any payment, the ENGINEER will
ntlt therebr be dce~ed to h~ve reviewed the ~eans, aethods, sequences,
techniques, or proce~durcs of construction Or safety precautions Or proqraMs incidt>n t
incidcn t Hereto or th...t the ENGINEER has madc any exa~in~tian to i"certain
how Or for what purpose any Contractor has used tl1e ao"i(>s paid on account
of tho Contract Price, or th.-.t title to anr of the work, materials, or
equipment has pa""cd to the Owner f~ee and clear of any lein, claims,
s~curity interests or enCu~branc~s, or that the Contractor(s) have co~pl~tcd
tl1rir work el~ctlr in acco~dance with th~ Contra~t Docu~ents.
ENGl NEER: "AIlOR STEWART & ASSOCIATES, INC.
BY, ----L4~
--
TITLE~ 6. '
_h_~~ ' ----
PATE: ---L..-:.Z:;L,,=__
==~~==:==:~;z~~~~====~~==;=~==~=~=~==~:~e:=~=;.~=___=~==;===:==~:~c;=~~;~~=:~;~~
Approved br Owncr/Co__ission
B'l'~
CITY OF ~RD[N HILLS -------~--~------------._-----~~----
TITLE =
-------------------------------~----
. MTE:
-------.~---------
= :::::z="..~=:::=...=z::;O:::===.:::~=~~=~~~=~~~=:"l'==~~:.::::;:=~=;;::::;:;==:o:==:::::==~=~=~~:E:~=:..=~~1Zl!::..:..!::=~ ~..:::;m':::=::=::::::;.=
-
,
CITY OF .1IRDEN HILLS
. MEM:IWIDOM
DATE: July 9, 1992
TO: Mayor and city council
~:@ Terry Post, TeIrq;lOrary city Acoountant
SUBJECT: Residential Recycling Fee ordinance 1\mendment
Attached is a letter dated June 25, 1992, fram City Attorney Filla
=ncerning a proposed Amendment to the Residential RecyclirxJ Fee
Ordinance.
REC:CMMENDATION:
staff concurs with Mr. Filla's =nclusions and recommends adoption of
Ordinance No. 289 RelatirxJ to Residential RecyclirxJ Fees, which amends
Section 11-31 of Ordinance No. 287 ImposirxJ a Residential RecyclirxJ Fee.
ACI'ION RroUIRED:
. If Council con=s, they should make a motion under Consent to adopt
Ordinance No. 289 RelatirxJ to Residential RecyclirxJ Fees, which amends
Section 11-31 of Ordinance No. 287 ImpoSirxJ a Residential RecyclirxJ Fee.
TP/ts
Attachments
.
W-\RREN E. PETERSON PETERSON, FRAM & BERGMAN tREAL PROPERTY LAW SPECIALIST
JEROME P. FILLA PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION tALSO ADMITTED IN FLORIDA,
DA.:'"IEL wrIT FRAM 300 MIOWK"iT FEDERAL BUILDING ILLINOIS, WASHINGTON D.C.,
GLENN A. BERGMAN WISCONSIN
JOHN MICHAEL MILLER 50 EAST FIFTH STREET -
OF COUNSEL
. GARY \'I. RECKER* ST, PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101-1197 MELVIN J. SILVER
TnlQTHY J. HASSETTt -
~nCHAEL T. OBERLE (6U) 291.8955
FAX NO. (612) 228.1753
June 25, 1992
Catherine Iago
City Administrator
City of Arden Hills
1450 West Highway 96
Arden Hills, MN 55112
RE: Residential Recycling Fee
Proposed Ordinance Amendment
Our File No.: 10450/900002
Cathy:
It has come to my attention that I may have incorrectly
drafted a portion of the Ordinance which was recently adopted by
the City relating to the Residential Recycling Fee. The Ordinance
as originally prepared and as adopted includes a statement which
seems to prohibit the City's recycling contractor from bidding on
contracts to collect recyclable materials from multiple family
dwellings or from the manufactured home park. This was not my
intent. I am not sure if it was the intent of the City Council.
. I am enclosing a proposed amendment to the Ordinance which
would correct the error by eliminating the last portion of the
second sentence of Section 11-3l. Prior to this proposed
amendment, that sentence read as follows:
The owners of multiple family dwellings and the owner of the
manufactured home park may be exempt from such fee upon
furnishing proof, in a manner satisfactory to the City
Administrator, that such owners have contracted for a
collection of recyclable materials by a collector other than
the City designated collector.
If the City's designated collector is also the contractor for
the collection of recyclable materials from multiple family
dwellings and/or from the manufactured home park, we should ensure
that there are sufficient reporting procedures to enable the City
to verify that the tonnage collected from multiple family dwellings
and/or from the manufactured home park are not included in the
tonnage Slip submitted to the City for reimbursement pursuant to
the City's contract. If you have any questions, please contact me.
.,ver.y" truly yours,
/
. ,." . E.e:.t?
. /" o,~? nno
JPF:bap "
,
\
enc. - .
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
aRDINANCE NO. 289
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO RESIDENTIAL RECYCLING FEES.
The Arden Hills City Council hereby ordains that Article IV,
Sections 11-31 of the Arden Hills City Code is hereby amended to
read as follows:
IV. Residential Recycling Service Fee.
11-31. Imposition of Fee. Except as herein provided, a
residential recycling service fee is hereby imposed on the owners
of all residentially occupied property within the City. The owners
of multiple family dwellings and the owner of the manufactured home
park may be exempt from such fee upon furnishing proof, in a manner
satisfactory to the City Administrator, that such owners have
contracted for the collection of recyclable materials. Proof of
such alternate service shall be submitted no later than July 15,
1992, and shall indicate that a contract has been entered into for
the succeeding calendar year. The total number of residential
dwelling units less the total number of exempt residential dwelling
uni ts F shall hereinafter be referred to as the total number of
assessable residential dwelling units.
. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective on
.
Adoption Date. Passed by the City Council of the City of Arden
Hills the 13th day of July , 1992.
Thomas Sather, Mayor
ATTEST:
Catherine Iago, Acting Clerk
Publication Date. Published on the of , 1992.
b\ord\AHORDll,
6/4/92
. 1
r' ..
CITY OF 1lRDEN HILLS
. MEHE\NDUM
DATE: .JUly 10, 1992
'lO: Mayor and City Council
~: Tery Shields, 1ldmin. secretary/(j)
SUBJECT: continuation of Keithson Pond Assessment Hearing
Attached is a letter dated July 8, 1992, from Engineer Graham regarding
the continued Keithson Pond Assessment Hearing.
Engineer Graham will be present at the meeting to answer any questions
or concerns you nay have.
Attachment
.
,
.'
"
. If
t
.
f
~',
1':
~t
.
~'
,
t,:
, ..
. ~~,,:,/ CONSULTING ENGINEERS
Maier Stewart & Associates Inc.
MEMO W: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: MARK GRAHAM, M.S.A. ;1!v
RE: KEITHSON POND ASSESSMENT HEARING
DATE: JULY 8, 1992
FILE: 520-029-20
As you know, the agenda for the July 13, 1992 City Council meeting includes the continuation of
the assessment hearing for the Keithson Pond Drainage Improvements.
Following the June 8, 1992 Council meeting, City Council members Malone and Hicks met with
the former City engineering firm to discuss this project.
The former engineer has indicated that the original intent for the pond was to provide an overflow
outlet through a drainage swale and baffled weir located west of the pond on property owned by
. Mr. George Reiling. However, the pond was never properly graded, the drainage swale was not
improved, the baffled weir was not constructed and no easement was obtained over the Reiling
property.
While this natural drainage swale exists, it would be necessary to further excavate it to ensure that
the Keithson Pond has an outlet. Excavation in the pond and drainage swale would consist of
grading the pond from its present elevation of approximately 972.0 to establish an elevation of
969.0 to 969.5, excavation of the swale to provide positive drainage towards the southwest across
Mr. Reiling's property and construction ofa baffled weir, with a top elevation of 970.5, to meet
Rice Creek Watershed District requirements.
The first floor elevation of the home on the north side of the pond, owned by Mr. Mark Magers,
is approximately 975.4, which is 4.9 feet above the top of the baffled weir. The next property to
the north, owned by Mr. Dick Foster, has a backyard elevation of approximately 970.0 to 972.0
and a first floor elevation of approximately 981.0. It would be necessary to place fill to a
minimum elevation of 973.0 on Mr. Foster's property to eliminate the ponding on his property.
This fIll would be generated from excavation of the existing pond.
File records and correspondence indicate that this grading work within the pond and drainage
swale was the original intent of the project. There is no record, however, of a formal easement
across Mr. Reiling's property to utilize this swale.
.
1959 SLOAN PLACE, SUITE 200, ST, PAUL, MINNESOTA 55117 612-774-6021
9800 SHELARD PARKWAY, SUITE 102, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55441 612-546-0432 . Equal Opportunity Employer
.
. KEITHSON POND ASSESSMENT HEARING
JULY 8, 1992
PAGE TWO
Given the number of written and verbal comments from the June 8th assessment hearing, the City
Council may consider reducing the scope of the project to grading, construction of a baffled weir,
placement of approximately 16 feet of 15" RCP to finish the storm sewer outlet from Keithson
Drive, tree removal and a limited amount of rip-rap. The estimated construction cost for this
work, based on bid prices from the low bid received in April, would be $8,000 to $13,000, These
costs do not include any monies for easement acquisition that may be necessary from Mr. Reiling.
The City has presently awarded the Keithson Pond Storm Sewer Improvements Project to
Machtemes Construction Co., Inc. This award was contingent on obtaining the necessary
easements from Mr. Reiling. Should the City choose to substantially reduce the scope of the
project, it would be necessary to have the City Attorney advise us on negotiating a change order.
Machtemes Construction Co., Inc. may have also incurred some costs on the award of this project
which would also have to be discussed.
We will be present at the July 13, 1992 City Council meeting to further discuss this matter.
MJG/ks
029-0801.JUL
.
.
, ..
MINl1l'ES
CITY OF THE ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOrA
PIANNJ:N; CCl!MISSICIN MEEll'IN3
WEDNESDl\.Y, JULY 1, 1992
. 7:30 P.M. - CITY HALL
Cl\.LL TO aIDER
Note that the Carmnission met at 6:30 p.m. to discuss Zoning Ordinance
Revisions until 7:30 p.m.
Chair Probst called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
ROLL Cl\.LL
Present: Chair Dermis Probst, Members Dave Carlson, Barbara Piotrowski,
Jeanne Winiecki, Raymond McGraw. Absent: Members steve Erickson, Scott
Petersen and Council Liaison Thomas MahCMald. Also present: Planner
John Bergly, Acting Clerk Administrator Catherine Iago, Building
Official Dave Kriesel, and Recording Secretary Tery Shields.
APPRCI\1E MINUTES
Winiecki noted on Page 9, Case #92-08, Variance for Dlugosch; the
address should read, 1482 Arden view Drive.
McGraw moved, seconded by Winiecki, to approve the Revised June 3, 1992,
Planning Minutes. All voted in favor. (5-0)
. PUBLIC HEl\RING - DEVELCll?MENr MClRATClRIUM
Chair Probst opened the public hearing at 7:35 p.m., Development
Moratorium.
Acting Clerk Administrator Catherine Iago continued the publication of
the Notice of Hearing in the New BriClhton Bulletin on Wednesday, June
24.
Chair Probst ~lained the Carmnission is in the process of reviewing and
proposing amendments to the Zoning Ordinance and that the Carmnission
recamrnends to Council a moratorium be placed.
Chair Probst asked if there was anyone present to speak in favor of or
opposed to this matter.
Mr. Mike Nordstrom, Gr'and Met (Alpo Pet Foods), asked if the moratorium
would affect his proposed suJ::division and ~ressed his concerns of
selling the property to perspective buyers who wish to develop it at the
same time the moratorium is in place.
Bergly ~lained the moratorium would not be effective until the Council
takes action at the July 13 Council meeting.
Member winiecki stated any development that would comply with the new
. ordinance would be acceptable.
Chair Probst asked if there were any other questions or conunents.
Hearing no response, the public hearing was closed at 7:38 p.m.
" ,
planning CoIIInission Meeting 2 7-01-92
PUBLIC HEroUNG - DEVELOPMENT MCRATClRIUM (CClNl'INUED)
Member Dave Carlson expressed his support of the moratorium for a period .
of 6 months instead of one year.
'Ihere was discussion of the length and contents of the moratorium and
what is most beneficial to the public and the City.
winiecki moved, Mo3raw seconded, to reconunend to Council to
proceed with the moratorium for a period of one year. (Winiecki,
Piotrowski, Probst, Mo3raw voting in favor; Carlson opposed) . (4-1)
PUBLIC HEroUNG - ClISE #92-06: SUP AMENmENl' WITH V1lRIANCES. 1306 W. 00. RCliID
E. 1\MJCO on. CCMP1\NY
winiecki moved, seconded by piotrowski to reconsider Case
#92-06, SUP Amendment with Variances, 1306 W. Co. Road E, Amoco Oil
Company. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) .
Chair Probst opened the public hearing at 7:49 p.m.; Case #92-06, SUP
Amendment with Variances, 1306 W. Co. Road E, Amoco oil Colrg:lany.
Acting Clerk Administrator Catherine Iago confirmed the publication of
the Notice of Hearing in the New BriQhton Bulletin and mailed to
affected property owners on Wednesday, June 24.
Planner Bergly referred to his report dated 7-01-92, and explained the
Amoco request was thoroughly discussed at the June 3 Planning Cormnission .
meeting . Options discussed were for a car wash location to the rear and
west end of the building, and a proposal for the east end. 'Ihe
Applicant requested approval = denial of the application as suhnitted
without considering the options. Action to deny the request was to be
sent to the Council. The Applicant suhnitted a request that the Case be
pulled fram the Council agenda to provide additional time to view an
optional plan.
'Ihe Planner reviewed the findings listed in his report and stated since
the June meeting, the Applicant, the Architect, Chainnan Probst and the
Planner have reviewed a revised scheme that addresses most of the
concerns of the Planning Conunission. The key issues discussed were:
1. Intensitv: '[Wo setback variances were requested to squeeze the
building, drives and parking onto an already heavily used site.
Response: The revised Plan has the new building to the southwest
of the existing station; the traffic patterrl proceeds clcx::kwise
around the rear of the station, into the carwash and exits on the
west drive that connects the restaurant to County Road E. The
drive and building are depressed approximately 3 feet =eating a
lower profile building situated to the rear of the site.
2. Concrestion: Traffic cirCUlating to and from the carwash cut
directly through the already congested site.
Response: The new Plan brings all carwash traffic around the
south and west ends of the site - existing from the west drive .
directly to County Road E.
~ Planning n .....; ssion Meeting 3 7-01-92
~ #92-06 CCONT'DI
. 3. parkincr: Some spaces were actually removed from the building area
and rel=ated on the very west edge of the site - west of the
restaurant access drive. Space on the east errl of the restaurant
site were questioned on the basis of the restaurant requirements.
ReslX>nse: Parking has been consolidated (12 spaces) just west of
the existing building by the rel=ation of the west drive. Five
spaces will remain on the east edge of the property. A handicap
space and the 5 other nearest spaces will be reserved for customer
parking . The Applicant investigated the restaurant parking and
found that it seats 150; with 1 space for each 3 seats, 50 spaces
are required and 72 are available. Amoco leases the 22 extra
spaces on the east errl. The Plan indicates 20 spaces on-site (one
is used for a tenporary remediation building) plus the 22 on the
restaurant site.
4. Trash Enclosure: Was l=ated in the front yard between the
parking and County Road E.
ReslX>nse: Rel=ated to the east side, behind the 5 parking
spaces . The enclosure will be finished the same as the principal
building and will have doors to completely enclose the structure.
5. Screenincr on SE Corner: Conce:rn was expressed regarding
headlights shining into the adjoining doctor's office.
RespOnse : The reversed traffic patte:rn minimizes this problem,
but, a 5-foot s=een fence softened with landscaping, is also
proposed to further separate the service station and its
associated traffic from the quieter office use. The fence will
. extend from the trash enclosure to the SE corner of the site.
6. Temporary Remediation structure and Prepane Disoensincr: These
uses had been prop:lSed over the last several months but were never
officially brought forward for action. The city wanted to kncM
the status of these and the inpact on the site Plan.
ReslX>nse : The tenporary SI1'all (10 x 20') building has been
l=ated in the southwest parking stall west of the min building.
Attempts were mde to l=ate it behirrl the building, but the
l=ation and elevation of the water collection trenches precluded
that possibility. When it is removed, one more parking space will
be available. Amoco does not allow propane dispensing at their
stations.
7. Siqnaqe: The total signage area and the area of individual signs
had not been determined at the time of the initial Planning
Commission review in June. signage added for the car wash would
have to be calculated.
RespOnse : Besides the normal business signs, service stations are
allowed signs showing gasoline prices and car wash facilities with
an area not to exceed 12 sq. ft. each. The area of these signs is
to be included in the maximum permitted area. Business wall signs
are lllnited to 10 percent of the building facade. Staff's
interpretation is that other directional or informational signs
are not included in the prescribed total business sign. As the
lot is a corner lot, the sign area could be 10 percent of the
County Road E facade and 10 percent of the Harnline facade. The
. Planner reviewed the calculations of the wall mounted sign as
outlined in his report of 7-01-92.
Planning Calmission Meeting .
4 7-01-92
~ #92-06 (OONT'DI
8. stom and Sanitary Sewer: 'Ihere was a dis=epancy between the .
Architect's proposal and the city Engineer's understanding of
Metropolitan and state requirements and pennits.
RespOnse:
a. A heated slab on the entry side of the car wash will be
drained via stom sewer to the Hamline Avenue ditch just
west of the site.
b. A heated slab on the exit side will extend fram the car wash
and west across the restaurant drive. 'Ihis is to avoid the
ice build up fram dripping cars and will drain into the
ditch to the west.
c. Carwash water will be drained directly into the sanitaJ::y
sewer . A pennit fram the MWCC may be required.
9. OVerall Appearance: As initially proposed, the carwash would have
its exit door facing County Road E.
Resoonse: 'Ihe revised Plan provides an unbroken brick facia, with
a 30-inch facia band around the top and 8 junipers along the wall.
Being depressed about 3 feet presents a lower profile to the
County Road E. view.
Planner Bergly concluded that he and Chainnan Probst have been working
with the Applicant and Architect on a day-to-day basis to arrive at a
solution that meets the city standards and address circulation,
appearance, landscaping, perceived intensity (and orderliness),
proximity to parking, etc. Bergly stated that he and Chainnan Probst
support the revised Plan and reccmunended approval. .
Bergly reported in light of all the service stations that have
eliminated the service aspect in favor of more gasoline sales and the
retail sale of food products, felt uncomfortable about being overly
restrictive for an operation that is successful and provides service to
residents in Arden Hills. The proposal does not require any variances
and has a plan that successfully addresses the concerns of the Planning
Commission. Bergly reccmunended 10 conditions which should be attached
to the Amended Special Use Permit:
1. A landscape bond be delivered to the City prior to issuance of the
Building Permit.
2. All pennits necessary fram the Metropolitan Waste Control
Commission, Pollution Control Agency, and any other required
pemitting agencies be secured with copies delivered to the city
prior to issuance of a Building Permit.
3. The City Engineer approve the site drainage plan.
4. The proposed terrporary remediation wilding be allowed to be
constructe:i after staff review of plans and details.
5. 'Ihe access easement document along the west area of the site
providing access to the restaurant be approved by the city
Attorney, as the restaurant does not have direct access to a
public street.
6. 'Ihe parking agreement between the restaurant and Amoco be filed
with the SUP as this parking is necessary to meet the parking .
requirements of the stations.
Planning ccmni.ssion Meeting 5 7-01-92
~E #92-06 (OONT'Dl
. 7. Employees and other long-tenn parkers be required to park in the
leased restaurant parking lot, and that no parking of daroaged
vehicles, unlicensed vehicles of inoperable vehicles be allowed in
this lot beyond a 24-hour period.
8. The station operators control the queue to the carwash on the
station site and that no such queue be allowed in public streets.
9. That the station operators protect the traffic safety on County
Road E from hazardous conditions resulting from water dripping
from cars leaving the carwash.
10. That the trash enclosure doors be shut at all times except when
loading or unloading trash.
Member winiecki complimented all parties involved to =eate a positive
option that satisfies the concerns of the Carrnnission and An\cxx) oil
Company.
Chair: Probst asked if there were any other questions or conunents.
Hearing no response, the public hearing was closed at 7:55 p.m.
Acting Clerk Administrator Iago stated Attorney Filla had two issues to
be addressed: proof of the lease for parking, and title for the
property . She also stated Attorney Filla would like to view the
documents prior to the July 13 Council meeting.
TOO Brauson, CMner of the An\cxx) station and the Architect, Harry
. Schroeder, stated they would comply with the request of Attorney Filla.
piotravski questioned the Applicant how the queue will be controlled to
avoid traffic congestion on County Road E.
Mr. Schroeder stated in the event traffic appears to backup, the
Attendant will advise the driver to return at a later date and issue a
raincheck ticket which is valid up to seven days.
Chair Probst asked if there were any questions = conunents from the
floor.
winiecki moved, seconded by Carlson that Carrnnission
recommend to Council approval of Case #92-06, SUP with Variances, 1306
W. Co. Road, E, An\cxx) oil Company, the plans dated July 1, 1992, with
the 10 =xlitions listed in the Planners recarrnnendation and the 11th
condition to show proof of lease for parking and title f= the property
to the Attorney pri= to July 13 Council meeting. Motion carried
unanilnously. (5-0)
Cl\SE #92-12; M:IN:R SUBDrvISICti/LOl' SPLIT. 4251 FERNliOCD AVENUE N:RTH. ALPO Pm'
FCXlDS (MIKE N:&IDSTRCH. GRAND Mm'l
Planner Bergly reviewed his report of July 1, 1992, relating to Minor
SUb:iivisionjLot Split at the Alpo Site, 4251 Fen1Wood Avenue North, Alpo
Pet Foods (Mike Nordstrom, Grand Met).
. Bergly explained that the Applicant proposes to divide a 14.88 a=e
tract into two parcels. Both parcels have frontage only on Fen1Wood
Avenue on the east and back onto a city Trail. Parcel A contains the
Alpo Pet Food operatic-- 'lnd Parcel B is vacant.
----.--.-.-
Planning Camlission Meeting 6 7-01-92 .
ClISE #92-12 (CDNl"DI
'!he Planner reviewed the findings listed in his report and stated the .
proposed division would be necessary to facilitate the sale of the
property. To date, the future owner has not been determined. He
reported the existing development on Parcel is setback from the proposed
dividing line more than the min:irnums required. 'Ihe SUbdivision
Ordinance allows park dedication for cormnercial/lndustrial development
up to a maxilnurn of 10 percent. If this division were to be treated as
most residential sutrlivisions are, only that portion of the total area
not already developed would be used to calculate park dedication
requirements .
In this case, Parcel B containing 8.15 acres would be used to detennine
the amount of park dedication. If the Park & Recreation camm.ission and
Council detennine that dedication of land is appropriate, Bergly
suggested consideration of land west of the large wetland and adjoining
the present trail easement. 'Ihis area is heavily wocded, has steep
slopes and is remote and probably not usable for blildings = parking.
Bergly explained that in the year-encl "Undeveloped land" report, this
unused portion of the Alpo site is shown as a site for potential
industrial development and anticipate the division and development
likely to follow. He stated the south property line indicates a slight
dis=epancy between the written legal description and the locations of
existing lot corner lOClnuments. On the north edge of the total property,
the 1/2 section plat indicates a separate 110 foot wide parcel - this
separate parcel was not included in the legal description given to the .
surveyors. Both of these ll'atters will be resolved in the final
d=uments that will be filed with the County.
Planner Bergly concluded to reconnnend approval with the following
conditions:
1. 'Ihe final d=uments to be filed address the two issues discussed
in the above paragraph.
2. 'Ihe park dedication requirements be determined and either
dedicated along with the division or paid prior to filing.
3. 'Ihe city Engineer determine if any additional easements are
required.
4. 'Ihe CMner is aware that special pennits ll'aY be required for any
changes to or work around the wetlands.
5. 'Ihe debris and the junked appliance on the site be removed.
6. 'Ihe City Attorney approve the final lot division d=uments pri=
to filing.
Chair Probst asked if there were any questions or connnents from the
floor.
'!here was discussion regarding park dedication of the property.
winiecki moved, seconded by Ma:kaw that camm.ission recommend
to Council approval of Case #92-12i Min= SUbdivision/lot Split, 4251 .
Fernwocd Avenue North, Alpo Pet Foods (Mike Nordstrom, Grant Met) with
the 6 conditions listed in Planner Bergly's report with the 7th
condition to show proof of the title and abstract of the property to the
City Attorney. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0)
,
Planning ocmnission Meeting 7 7-01-92
DISCUSSICIi': 0l'HER PJ:ANNIm ISSUES
. NORI'HWE'SI'ERN CD:LLElSE: Ca:rnmission discussed the Jlll1e 2, 1992, letter
received fram F. Gene KOrdick, Administrative vice President,
Northwestern College, regarding waterfront activities. It was
determined for Acting Clerk Administrator Iago to respond to Gene
Kordick's letter and state they are in violation of the zoning co:ie and
request a meeting be scheduled with Dr. Donald Edcksen, Plarmer Bergly,
and Acting Clerk Administrator Iago.
CITY HALL STUDY: Chair Probst informed the Ca:rnmission of the status of
the City Hall and Public Works facilities construction.
D:rnm:S FOSI'ER. WHAT-A-RACDUEl' SPORTS CLUB: Discussion was held on the
status of the site Plan Review, case #92-09
Carlson l1IOVed, seconded by winiecki to convey the
Cammission I s general concerns to the Colll1cil that it appears to set a
precedence using financial hardship as a basis for extension. (Prol::st,
Piotrowski, winiecki, Carlson voting in favor; M03raw ab3tain). (4-0-1)
CDUNCIL REPCRT
Acting Clerk Administrator Iago reported on items of interest to the
Cammission.
cx:NI'INUED DISCUSSICIi': ZONING ClIDINlINCE REVISIONS
. The Cammission continued discussion on Zoning Ordinance Revisions
between 8:40 p.m. and 9:30 p.m.
1\OJOURN
McCraw moved, seconded by winiecki to adjourn at 9:40 p.m.
Chair Dennis Probst
.
~ "!!
STATE OF MINNESOTA
. COUNTY OF RAMSEY
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
ORDINANCE NO. 288
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A CITYWIDE DEVELOPMENT MORATORIUM.
The Arden Hills City Council ordains that Section XIV(B) is hereby
added to Appendix A of the Arden Hills City Code to read as
follows:
Section B. Citywide Development Moratorium
l. The City of Arden Hills is conducting studies and will
hold public hearings for the purpose of considering
comprehensive amendments to its zoning regulations.
2. Pending the completion of public hearings and the
adoption of amendments to its zoning regulations, the
Arden Hills City Council has determined that it would be
in the public's interest to impose a Development
Moratorium on all property within the City of Arden
Hills.
. 3. There is hereby imposed a Development Moratorium pursuant
to the revisions of MS 462.355, Subd. 4, on all property
within the City of Arden Hills. During the period of the
Moratorium, the development of property shall be
restricted as follows:
a. property shall not be subdivided.
b. new structures shall not be constructed on
property.
c. building additions to existing structures and
expansions of existing uses on property shall not
be allowed unless the addition or expansion is in
compliance with the proposed amendments to the
City's zoning regulations as determined by the City
Council.
d. a construction activity within an existing
structure, which would not otherwise require City
Council review, will be allowed provided that such
improvements are undertaken in compliance with the
current zoning regulations and the proposed
amendments thereto.
4. The Development Moratorium shall commence on the day
. following the publication of this Ordinance and shall
1
III' ..
continue until day of , 1993, or
. until the Arden Hills City Council takes further action
to alter the term of the Development Moratorium as it
relates to specific development proposals or parcels,
whichever event occurs first.
Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective on
.
Adoption Date. Passed by the City Council of the City of Arden
Hills the 13th day of July , 1992.
Thomas Sather, Mayor
'ATTEST:
Catherine Iago, City Administrator
. Publication Date. Published on the of , 1992.
b\ord\AHORDIO
6/12/92
.
2
, , ,
. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
MEHIlANDUM
Il1<TE: JUly 10, 1992
"" ~ """'" .... city ".meil
FRal:@ Terry Post, Temporary city 1\CCOUlltant
StJBJE::T : Revised Interim Use lIgreement, What-A-Raoquet Sports Club
As directed by Council at the June 15, 1992 Worksession meeting, city
Attorney Filla has reviewed and made necessary changes to the Interim
Use Agreement for the proposed What-A-Racquet Sports Club by Developer
Dennis Foster. Mr. Filla's July 9, 1992, =espondence to Mr. Foster's
Attorney, Mr. Balyk, is attached.
Attorney Filla will be present and available for questions and corrnnents
as Council discusses this unfinished agenda item.
TRP Its
Attachments
.
.
SENT BY:P~TERSON FRAM BERGMA\ 7- ~H)2 4:06PM ;PETERSON FRAM BERGMA~ ;# 2/ 5
\VARREN E. PETERSON PETERSON, FRAM & BERGMAN "tR.E:AL1'll()I'.~HT\: I..AW:it'!H:IAI,I:-iT
J.KkOMR n fIT.T.A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION "'ALSO AUMlTl'J:o;J) IN l!LORU>A,
.~\.l'Wi:L WITT fRAM :-\()(/ MIHI,\I'EST rF:n:F~IlAJ. ntm,nTNG ILLINOIS, "tA.'JIlIN(;TON H,C.,
Gl.t;NN I.... H":NGMAN WJtlCONtlJN
JOHN MICHAEL MILLER ~Il EA~T flFrH !;TlUiliT -
GAR'\' W. :RF.CI>,""J;;'R. t'n~ l-'AUL, MINNl!Sl1fA S510I-IIY7 OJ.' COUNSEL
TIMlJfHY J. IIAssrnTr ,\1KI.VIN ,I. ."iILVgR
~flCITART. T_ onERLE -
(fi12) 2i}1.A955
liAX 1'\(1, ((11).) 22R.115;\
JUly 9, 1992
Tom Balyk
Balyk and Wiseman
5 East County Road B
St. Paul, MN 55117
BY FACSIMILE
AND O.S. MAIL
RE: What-A-Racquet Sports Club
Your File No.: 90-131. 004
Our File No.: 10460/900004
Tom:
EnClosed is a revision to the Interim Use Agreement for the
above~oaptioned matter which inoludes the Reoitals. I have also
. restructured the Terms and Conditions contained in Sections 3(A)1
through 3(A)6. However, the content of those sections remain the
same. In addition, I have inserted a requirement in Section 3(D)
that the data submitted be in a form acceptable to the City.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
verX.,.t:CUlY yours,
" >',)
'~ '--;'ea
,,\"- ~,=<. :i:"'<-
,../" ,:r~:=:,o' P. Filla
JPF:bap (
enc.
ce: Terry Shields
.
SENT ~Y:PETERSON FRAM BERGMAN 7- 8-82 : 4:06PM :FETERSON FRAM BERGMA- ;# 3/ 5
.
AN INTERIM USE AGREEMENT
(1) PARTIES. This Agreement is entered into by and between the
City of Arden Hills, Q municipal corporation and political
subdivision of the state of Minnesota (herein "City"); and Dennis
Foster, his successors and assigns (herein "Developer").
(2) RECITALS.
A. The Developer has proposed to construct a tennis facility
pursuant to approved plans and specifications on certain
property (herein "Project") located within the City of
Arden Hills. Construction of the Project was authorized
by the City Council on December 10, 1990. Construction
of the Project did not occur during 1991 and the City has
asserted its approval of the Project expired on December
10, 1991. In addition, the City is considering the
imposition of a Development Moratorium pending adoption
of comprehensive zoning code changes, some of which, may
j,mpact the Developer's Proj ect.
B. Developer claims that the original approval remains
effective and/or that subsequent actions by the City or
. its staff have reasonably led developer to conclude that
a re-application is all that would be required in order
to obtain the appropriate building permits for the
project. Developer further asserts that it was not
advised of the proposed Development Moratorium and that
it has incurred substantial costs toward the financing
and construction of the Project in reliance upon City
action.
C. The City and the Developer wish to resolve any disputes
relating to the construction of the Project without the
cost and delay of litigation. The City is willing to
allOW an interim use of the Developer's property for the
Project pursuant to the terms of this Agreement.
(3) TERMS AND CONDITIONS. In oonsideration of the mutual
undertakings herein expressed, the City and Developer agree as
follows:
A. The City Building Inspector shall issue a Building Permit
for the project upon Developer's satisfaction of the
following conditions:
l. Combining the parcels on whiCh the Project will be
located.
. 2. Granting Easements for utilities, driveweys, fire
lanes and access from Lexington Avenue on forms
approved by the City's Attorney.
ss\r BY:PliTERSON fRAM BERGMAN 7- 8-82 ; 4:07PM ;PETERSON FRAM BERGMA~ ;# 4/ 5
. 3. Approval of Grading and Drainage Plans for the
Project by the City's Engineer.
4. Issuance of appropriate permits by the Rice Creek
Watershed District
5. Satisfaction of the City's Park Land Dedication
requirements.
6. Filing of a Landscaping Bond in an amount
determined by the City's Planner.
B. Developer shall have sixty (60 ) days from the date of
this Agreement to satisfy the conditions stated in
Sections 3(A)1 through 3(A)6 or the City Council'S
authorization to issue a Building Permit shall expire and
the Developer shall resubmit site plans for approval
which shall be in compliance with the current City
RegUlations.
C. Developer shall construct the project according to site
plans approved by the City.
D. The air supported structures shall be removed wi thin five
. (5) years of the date of this Agreement or Developer, at
least ninety (90) days prior to the expiration date of
the initial five (5) year period, shall request that the
Ci ty grant an extension of three (3) additional years.
Upon receipt of such request, the City shall grant the
extElnsion if Developer provides dat", or information in a
form acceptable to the City which indicates that:
1. Developer has made a good faith effort to obtain
financing for a permanent structure but is unable
to obtain such financing; and,
2. Developer need additional time to repay debt
incurred to construct the project.
E. In the event that Developer ceases to utilize the air
supported structures as a tennis facility during the
.
SENT BY:P~TERSON FRAM BERGMAN: 7- 8-82 : 4:07PM ;PETERSON FRAM BERGMA~ :# 5/ 5
, '
. initial five (5 ) year term or any extension thereof,
Developer shall move the air supported structures from
the site and otherwi,sB secure the property so that it is
in oompliance with the City's Development Regulations.
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
City Administrator ..'~
DEVELOPER
Dennis Foster
b/j/l0460904,OOl
.
.
---
I I
. ' CITY OF 1\RDEN lULLS
MEH:1U\NOOM
DATE: July 10, 1992
ro: Mayor and city Co1mcil
FIlCH: Tery Shields, 1\dmin. Secretary
stJBJEX:T: 1992 street Recycling llllprOVeIIIents (Dunlap street and
Round Lake Road west)
Attached is the following infonnation for your review and consideration:
1. Letter dated July 9, 1992, from Engineer Graham regarding
the bid opening of the 1992 street Recycling Inprovements
(Dunlap street and Rourrl Lake Road West).
2. Resolution No. 92-46 Accepting the Bid in the Matter of the
1992 street Cold In-Place Recycling Improvements.
3. Resolution No. 92-47 Establishing CorrnIIercialjIndustrial
Assessment Rate for 1992 Cold In-Place Recycling
Improvements .
4. Resolution No. 92-48 Determining Assessed Cost of
. lIlprovement and Ordering Preparation of Proposed Assessment
Roll in the Matter of the 1992 street Cold In-Place
Recycling Improvements.
RECI:M1ElIDATION:
staff recamrnends adoption of Resolution Nos. 46, 47, and 48.
ACTION REQUIRED:
If Council concurs, they should adopt RESOLt1l'ICIl' m. 92-46 Accepting the
Bid in the Matter of the 1992 street Cold In-Place Recycling
Improvements; RESOLUTICIl' m. 92-47 Establishing CorrnIIercialjIndustrial
Assessment Rate f= 1992 Cold In-Place Recycling Improvements; and
RESOLUTICIl' m. 92-48 Detennining Assessed Cost of Improvement and
Ordering Preparation of Proposed Assessment Roll in the Matter of the
1992 street Cold In-Place Recycling Improvements.
Engineer Graham will be present to answer questions or concerns.
Attachments
.
. .
. CONSULTING ENGINEERS
Maier Stewart & Associates Inc.
July 9, 1992
File No: 520-034-20
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Arden Hills
1450 W. Highway 96
Arden Hills, MN 55112
RE: BID OPENING
1992 STREET RECYCLING IMPROVEMENTS
Dear Council Members:
Bids were received and opened at 10:00 a.m, on July 9, 1992 for the above referenced project. A
total of three bids were received. Following is a list of bidders and their bids, An itemized bid
tabulation is also attached.
. CONTRAClDR TafAL BID
Ashbach Construction Co. $82,948.10
Valley Paving, Inc. $83,534,90
Midwest Asphalt, Inc. $90,260.50
The estimated construction cost for cold in-place recycling of Round Lake Road West and Dunlap
Street was $108,200,
We have contacted references provided by Ashbach Construction Co., Inc. for similar type work
completed for Ramsey County and the State of Minnesota. All references indicated that the
Contractor is proficient in this type of work and has completed work meeting all project
specifications. Dan Schaat with the Ramsey County Public Works Department has indicated that
Ashbach Construction Co. is the largest cold in-place recycler in the Twin Cities.
Based on these references, we are prepared to recommend award of the 1992 Street Recycling
Improvements to Ashbach Construction Co., Inc. as the lowest responsible bidder after the
assessment hearings for Dunlap Street and Round Lake Road. A resolution is attached for your
consideration which sets the assessment hearing date for August 10, 1992.
The assessment rate for these improvements is based on the project cost, calculated as follows:
Actual Construction Bid $ 82,948.10
Administration, Fiscal, Legal (32 %) $ 26,543.40
. Total Project Cost $109,491.50
1959 SLOAN PLACE, SUITE 200, ST, PAUL, MINNESOTA 55117 612-774-6021
9800 SHELARD PARKWAY, SUITE 102, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55441 612-546-0432 . Equal Opportunity Employer
. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
JULY 9, 1992
PAGE TWO
Based on the City's Assessment Manual, the project will be funded by assessing 50% of the
project cost, equal to $54,745,75, to the abutting property owners, while the remaining 50% will
be funded by the City.
An estimated assessment rate of $14 to $15 was presented at the public hearings held on June 8,
1992. Based on the bids received, however, a reduction of the estimated assessment rate to
$10,73 per linear foot can be supported, This rate is based on 2600 linear feet of front footage on
Round Lake Road West and 2500 linear feet of front footage on Dunlap Avenue for a total
assessable footage of 5100 feet.
Attached for your review and consideration are three resolutions pertaining to the August 10, 1992
assessment hearing. The first resolution accepts the bids. The second resolution establishes the
commercial/industrial equivalent assessment rate for cold in-place recycling as $10.73 per front
foot. The third resolution determines the costs to be assessed and orders preparation of an
assessment roll.
We will be in attendance at the July 13, 1992 City Council meeting to further discuss this matter.
. Sincerely,
MAIER STEWAlIT AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
/JfeuL xfI~~
Mark 1. Graham, P.E,
MJG/lcs
enc.
034-0901.JUL
.
I' ; !
, , 1
' I i
, I
j :
i I
I I
. I I :
I I
I I
, I
i !
, I
: I
! I
! I
, : I
I I
, I
I
,
i i
I _l -- -- _i -- ,
.', ': I
.' l...J....I I, "7>'o.==~., c.:,.,. -c-=-=,~="="', -==- <:;>
~~~!! ~:~~~!: ~~~~:f- ~
! ~~~~I -_~~~f~ _~~w~~, ~
i ::~~~'J ~~~~~~i'~~ ~~~g:~:~::::
! r~~IJ :- '~~
-, = -- -1'--
I . .:.... .
. .~~, ~=M'=~ _~~=~
,~~', ~-=~~~ ~=t~~_
, ........ r , _ ~ .
,~~ I I _~=~~ ___I~,,~
I v-~..::.......... I ,-... ........ "'.J "'...
'L.J...J -. I
. ::aE I-- -...., ,
. .=-......... , t
: ~ s _lJ
,
, l...J....I f ~=~~_ ~ _~~~~ ~
I ,:.....;" .;'.or~<::-=..,... ......~'c:.<~.~'"':.., ,"',
, "-' .::.= I ,-,>- '"'" c-... = ~,-, , ox. .,.... ..w '-'" ,-;::, u.... -c.
...., ':::>:"~':>""-I y-...".,..,=--,. "'-_I_~....o.r" r.-"
t...., ....... ...... I "",. <.-..n ._...,.... , ~ <::>~, ,-""", "'" ..._. j
= . ~-I .~~~_~( ~~~~~,
. ,-, i~gli'-' -- i- i~ ~
. -. ~ -- -.--
0:.:-- ,<z::, .
,-.... I .::..... l...J....I ; , .....,. =, ...,. -c. ...-, ..-. 0.:0 ..._. =- ,.,-~
..-~ ,(...,):, I-..,....-;.~......._~ "-.--<>=''''~''C'''''
I "............. ; I '. .. . . .
, .........::.:: ; l ~ ,~ = ,..... r.-. ..... <:> ,:0<;, ~_'... ",,",
:::: : ::j ""-:;r : - c-... _-< "....l
=--~ , -..t: t-- -4- ,
. ~---......... I
I ~ i ~ _1 :
""'- , . .
~ I l...J....I' ~==~=.~ ~~~=~,~ =
~: ~ ~: ."". ~ .= Co N , -.(,' "': .:;;:;: .~ "=::"'-~ ..,
t-- '~g:-..., ~,~~::::::g;~~;' ~ I :;;~~':::.:"~:::::: J =- 'OJ;'
......, ,"-" -, .,. ....... ...-, "='" , .-<, -...:> -.. ...-:. ,....... r.., , ...-"
'-'"' '--I -... , ...... oa- = c.-, , '..-. I'~. <'T.> L'::;- t'.-:o , "-""
..:...:: , ~...:.::: ; 1 __ -0 t t ..-., C'... ""'"
~ i: -;r i ~ -H- ", ~o = = = i ,"- I _. = "_',," ,= '- ,y> 1 ~
-' l~ r =:::::: I: .,......-:,~~.,...........,;. ! ""'''-;:O-~Y'''''~ I L.J....
t; j;:::; ~'~:S:~': --"'L7."~~""" -'Q-~~n J.::::.
~ . =- -...., ::::z:
.:x: <.r~ j ~ :; Z;::::; I.J . <::=>
,............. lll'n ~ ~ =: .", r=, i 1_
"" '" I ~ -". -- =" -I J.. . :5
!;;:= t_ :j>- ".1. <::1--0"",,".:::>000 C;IoQ.o..c::.O !~
,= 1- ..r- ,'.~..".. .::or...,""'<r""-'''''' ..,..., ,.:..... >r..oQo.:-....<_..<:::> l..q:
;::,:; ..... .:-J .::.:: tJ....... : i....... r-_ ,...., r-.. r-. I>. Ll... ',co...-~ ...,.. '=" .",... .,.... I _
-=~~ rr- ,~~~ ~ ~~
.:.::: 0;. =- I; = '. " - _ LL.I
<=0-<::;_....... ,.-= I ,__
,+-- ':::::> . , -....... ...:0:: "-"
c:,........ tl<n . """ . 1 ...... ...... . ..... t ~........
""':'=""'1-.::o::::::ti ~ ! 0 IB~
.:-....:>-,.... '-'-' ,: I-- '.10-- l ,,,-,, "lo::
~-~- "- r'~ ~"~~
0-..........<<: 1'= '.J "..._."",~=>-- >-<r=::z:..... 1
-~~~ I'~l ~~-_~ ~ ~~_,__~ ~ t~~
, i -, L - ~ - - - .,:. -t . , ;iq:,. J it! .q;: ~
I .. .. h t, I :::,. , ..... ...... ~_ ~ T I..... I..L-l _ ! ..;n .::::.
.. : :::. ~ ~ ::::;: .: ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ : ~ ~ ~~....... f 0-
] ~~~~:, ~=:--' ~~ ~ ~..:~ ~~ ~ I~~ '-'"'
~ ~=d~ t=: I J ~: ~=:;'......)<...;r .".,.: ~=:;o:....o<....:. e: .~:a:: j~-s;""";.. 1 ""- =::z: j. = , """" I <-> '"'>.....,..::..: """" 0f. L.3' "-'<' ,.......:.<::....-;, I.......
j. ~ ...... ::= l ..... :. ~ ~ ~ ~ -. ~: ~ ~ ~ ~ ""- ~ ~ 1 ~
' ':.-'-f ..~ .'0=01 -=::a ""'" <Co. .="""'....r: 1=""", =''"'''=.
: ~ :::;; :s:~ ~ S 5t;~': = 1>-- 1 ~g:::::
I. ! ::~ ,:~l523:::;::; ~ ~~~a.~:'::: ~ j~~ =_.......
,,.,., I ,~ I' ,.,-,== J'~-O'= '__~'
'c::., . . """ ., 1 "-" i . <;r" 1- "-::. L~
_: i :st: ::-=::;:.::;::.=.;:;::;::;; =- .....t:;:!;5;::;::'; =. e':i:s """~
~ : ' r L..u : --< ""'" ~ '-'-' ......, - ,': -= ~ ..... I..u "'" ~=- ! c....> L.L.. i';'- == :::z:
I;:::::. 1 '......... ,I LJ..I .:....;:.... ...... W....... ':'... .:..-...... >- 0::;. :00:.: r-:.
"""'I I jl--l c:.+-:---_~ --l --l>to:>>->_:_,;..=..-, oX- """'......... I
~ l ! i : ~ : ~ ~ : ::;: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : :: ~ J~ ! ~ ~ .i w.:: ~
. """ . . i I . ::%: , _ 0.. ''''ll ,.... <=> :1: = l _.:..... ....., ....-, """" = := L..:> !I:;OO<;:;,-
-- . , , ! <...> 1 ...... V'. r-":o ''''' = "...11 . i..... """" ,--. ""'''-';' L..> 0:;;;. ........ '<1:;.1: =
I",.... i ' I' ~ 1 ~-<:r:..-..........= "..-, ,. """-4'..:-....-......", cf. t-_....."""" ;1 =""""""
. ". , .
I' . l ~ : I - ""'-' .'.... ~..-- _ c... r."';' 'U".....
: ~ ~ i: ,
,- I' t-_ ! 1-'
: i
I . ;
~ I ,
I ! 1
,.1 ~ I:, ,;J-"~-:'-_ ===_:;:-=:=-~=-c i ..r..:: _~; --_~ _1(.1,;:...!.- ~ =:__ -::':-~_, =---. "~~-
. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 92- 46
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING TIlE BID
IN TIlE MATTER OF TIlE 1992 STREET
COLD IN-PLACE RECYCLING IMPROVEMENTS
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolutions 92-38 and 92-40, competitive bids were solicited and
received for the 1992 Street Cold In-Place Recycling Improvements as set forth in
the bid tabulation attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the amount of the bids and the responsibility of the
bidders.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arden Hills,
Minnesota:
1. The bids received on July 9, 1992 for the 1992 Street Cold In-Place Recycling
Improvements are hereby accepted.
. Passed and adopted this 13th day of July, 1992,
Thomas R. Sather, Mayor
ATTEST:
Catherine J. Iago, Deputy City Clerk
.
. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 92- 47
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL
ASSESSMENT RATE FOR 1992 COLD IN-PLACE
RECYCLING IMPROVEMENTS
WHEREAS, the City Assessment Manual outlines the methods of determining that the
commercial/industrial equivalent assessment rate shall be based on 50 % of the cost
of cold in-place recycling improvements plus all associated overhead costs for a
typical residential street section,
WHEREAS, the City Council shall establish, by resolution, the commercial/industrial equivalent
assessment rate for cold in-place recycling improvements on an annual basis as
determined by comparable project data available to the City,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arden Hills,
Minnesota:
l. The commercial/industrial equivalent assessment rate for cold in-place recycling
. improvements constructed in 1992 shall be $10.73 per assessable front foot.
Passed and adopted this 13th day of July, 1992.
Thomas R. Sather, Mayor
ATIEST:
Catherine J. Iago, Deputy City Clerk
.
. . , ..
. CITY OF ARDEN HILlS
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 92- 48
A RESOLUTION DETERMINING ASSESSED COST OF
IMPROVEMENT AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ROLL IN TIlE MATTER OF
THE 1992 STREET COLD IN-PLACE RECYCLING
WHEREAS, costs have been determined for the 1992 Street Cold In-Place Recycling
Improvement consisting of a contract price of $82,948.10 and expenses incurred or
to be incurred by the City in the making of the improvement In the amount of
$26,543.39 for a total cost of the improvement of $109,941.50,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arden Hills,
Minnesota:
1. Based upon the City Assessment Policies, it is determined that the portion of this
improvement to be paid by the City and not assessed to benefited properties is $54,745,75,
2. The portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited properties pursuant to the Arden
Hills City Assessment Policies shall be $54,745.75.
. 3. The assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments and shall extend over a
period of five (5) years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before September
15, 1992, with interest at the rate of 8.()()% per annum from the date of the adoption of the
assessment resolution,
4, The City Administrator with the assistance of the Project Engineer shall forthwith calculate
the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvement against every assessable
lot, piece, or parcel of land, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law, and
shall have available at the City Administrator's office a copy of the proposed assessment
roll for public inspection.
5. Upon completion of the proposed assessment roll, the City Administrator shall notify the
Council and schedule a public hearing on August 10, 1992 upon the proposed assessment,
causing notice of the hearing by publication and mail to be made at least two weeks prior to
the hearing,
Passed and adopted this 13th day of July, 1992,
ATTEST: Thomas R. Sather, Mayor
. Catherine J. lago, Deputy City Clerk
..
. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
MEKro\NDtJM
mTE: J'uly 10, 1992
TO: Mayor and city council
FRCM: Tery Shields, 1\dmin. Searetary~
SUBJECT: Driveway Issue - Mr. Francis Podlasek
Per Council direction at the June 29 Council meeting, attache::! is a
letter date::! July 7, 1992, from Engineer Graham regarding the driveway
f= Mr. Francis Podlasek, 4410 North Snelling Avenue.
Engineer Graham will be present to answer questions and =ncerns.
Attachment
.
.
..
. CONSULTING ENGINEERS
Maier Stewart & Associates Inc.
July 7, 1992
File No: 520-019-30
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Arden Hills
1450 W. Highway 96
Arden Hills, MN 55112
RE: PODLASEK DRIVEWAY ISSUE
NORfH SNELLING AVENUE
Dear Council Members:
As directed at the June 29, 1992 City Council meeting, we have estimated the cost to remove the
existing pavement surface on Mr. Podlasek's driveway from the concrete driveway apron to his
garage slab and to excavate to a uniform depth of 6". The length of this work is approximately
120 feet and the driveway width is 18 feet. We have assumed that the existing bituminous surface
. is nominally 2" thick. The quantities necessary to remove 6" of depth would be bituminous
pavement removal of the existing surface and common excavation to the required depth. Based on
calculated quantities of 240 square yards of pavement removal and 30 cubic yards of common
excavation, the estimated cost to complete this work is $1,500. This cost estimate is based on
average information provided by small driveway contractors familiar with this type of work.
These costs are significantly higher than if any further work would have been completed as part of
the street reconstruction project.
The discussions during the project with Mr, Pod1asek would have extended new bituminous
surfacing to a point approximately 40 feet back from the roadway. Based on the contract prices,
which could have been used, the cost to complete this work would have been $376.
Please contact me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
MAIER STEWART AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
/7fad-~~
Mark J. Graham, P.E,
MJG/ks
cc: Ms. Cathy Iago, City of Arden Hills
. 019-0701.JUL
1959 SLOAN PLACE, SUITE 200, ST, PAUL, MINNESOTA 55117 612-774-6021
9600 SHELARD PARKWAY, SUITE 102, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55441 612-546-0432 . Equal Opportunity Employer
. CITY OF 1IRDEN HILLS
MEM:IlANOOM
Il1a'E : .:JUly 10, 1992
TO: Mayor and city council
~:@)
Terry Post, TElIIpOrary 1\cCOUtltant
SUBJECT: Charitable Gambling Infonnational Meeting update
This morning, members fram all seven licensed charitable gambling
organizations and myself had a short meeting to discuss Ordinance No.
265 and feedback relating to proposed staff recanunenda.tions to amend
said Ordinance. The following are issues raised during the meeting:
L '!he organizations are of the opinion that precedent has been set
by the City accepting past ten percent net profit =ntribltion
payments and that any reinterpretation (i.e., disallowing
subtractions for taxes paid) would be grounds for a lawsuit.
2. Many of the organizations claim that they were given specific
. instructions fran the fonner city Administrator to use Line 36 in
computing the ten percent net profit =ntribltion. Line 36 has
already been reduced by the states taxes paid.
3. Many of the organizations claim that Attorney Filla gave tacit
approval to the organizations I method of calculation by not
challenging this subject in previous public meetings.
4. All of the organizations expressed a desire to personally contact
Mayor Sather to express their concerns about "changing the ground
rules" and denanding either a Council agenda spot or a public
hearing to discuss the issue.
5. As a technical point, the groups pointed out that Section 5-9
"Restriction of Number of bingo occasions" was inconsistent with
state law and that "bingo occasions" should be llKlre closely
defined as being evening sessions.
6. A few organizations also voiced the opinion that since I was the
only change in the City/Council personnel ~lement and things
were operating smoothly before, I l11USt be "the problem".
TRP Its
.
tJC: '1tl + (](!.
G.t:t:lc.f/
os jj'Y"
1A ,t.fS~ ~"" '"
~I=l" Of 0J
t\l. \
~., '" , "J
'\)(Jt \~ 0{)'
, \'> \\ ~~f>vl,; ..-(.> ~
\ ,-~ ~)t {# HEADLINES
.j/' t> (-"d-
~~~ ,~COUNCIL CORNER - JULY, 1992
\l,,>vf:-' Thank you for all the nice things you've had to say about
the new look of our newsletter, HEADL I NES. We're pleased
that you like it, and hope you'll continue to find it both
informative and easy to read.
In our inaugural issue, we promised to use this column to
let you know what the Counci I is doing. Right now, as many
of you are still enjoying the long, warm days of summer, our
thoughts are turning to the new year, and the 1993 budget.
The staff began work on the it in June, and the Council will
undertake review starting in August. Our analysis will
occur in a series of work sessions during August, September,
and perhaps into October. Like virtually all of our
meetings, these sessions are open to the public, and you are
welcome to attend. Specific dates and times aren't
determined as yet, but will be published and broadcast on
cable channel 16 as soon as they are set. Watch for them,
and feel free to come,
By September 15th, the council will have determined the
. proposed tax levy for next year, and provided it to Ramsey
County. The County will then begin preparing its Fall
mailing which will disclose the actual taxes for each
property, incl uding the levies of Ramsey County, our school
districts, and other taxing entities, A formal public
hearing on the budget will be held in December.
Our goal in assembling the budget will be the same as
always, to deliver the best possible services at rock bottom
cost. You may have seen the recent State Auditor's report
that pegged our spending at only $192 per capita, an amount
very near the bottom of the list for all of Minnesota's
ci ties. Some cities spend upwards of $800 per person
annually, and many range from $250 to $600. We're proud of
the fact that we, and the Councils before us, have
maintained a tradition of frugality. Look for it to
continue.
In the months ahead we will be asking for your support on a
very important issue, new City facilities. We've squeezed
by in a 2,700 square foot City Hall that is forty years old.
The 10,000 square foot public works building is actually an
assemblage of three garages that were pieced together to
create six truck bays, Public buildings get heavy doses of
wear and tear, and the many years have taken their toll.
. During 1990, a citizens committee investigated many
alternatives, including refurbishing, but recommended new
buildings because the existing ones were is such poor
condition. We have to agree. City Hall's roof leaks, its
outer walls are becoming unsound, and the heating, cooling,
--------- -----------
council Corner - July, 1992
Page: 2
plumbing and electrical systems are all in need of ~
replacement. The public works garage's mechanical systems
are also in poor condition, and even though we jam as much
inside as we can, a lot of our equipment has to sit outside,
exposed to the weather. In fact, we wouldn't allow anyone
in the city to clutter their property with the outside
storage that we have. There is little doubt that the time
has come to address these problems.
We've been careful with expenditures through the years, and
this isn't about to change. Function, not fancy, will be
the key element of any new facilities we build. You'll see
no exotic plants or oak offices in any building we might
construct, just solid, efficient and well designed work
spaces that will permit our employees to serve you in the
best possible manner. The need is real and we must enlist
your support. And yes, that means we need to talk about
financing. Prudent investing through the years should yield
the funds to construct a City Hall, but the public works
building will require your approval of a bond issue. Our
preliminary estimates suggest the need to borrow $3 million
for 20 years, and the payments will add a mere $4.00 per
month to the typical tax bill. Expect more details in the
weeks to come, and in the meantime, please stop by City Hall
and take a look around. We think you'll quickly agree that
it is woefully inadequate, and hope to enlist your support ~
for this very necessary project.
Please let us know if there is a topic or question that
you'd like to see discussed in this column. You can write,
phone, or stop by at a meeting, and please do, because we
would enjoy hearing from you.
~
. July 13, 1992
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Dale Hicks
RE: Vacation of easement along Old Snelling between County Road
E and south to Hamline intersection with Snelling Avenue
I don't want to discuss this now during Council Comments, but want
you to be aware of this issue. Mr. Bill Chapman, 1475 Skiles Lane,
called and met with me a week ago. He wants the City to request
the County to vacate a portion of the easement along Old snelling
Ave. He has talked with the County, and they have told him they
would vacate the easement to the city if the city requests same.
They will not, however, initiate the action. There currently is a
200 foot easement with the road taking approximately 86 feet. He
wants to have 50 feet vacated on either side of the street and
proposes ,that the city in turn offer it for sale to adjacent
property owners. He then said "We could get about 10 additional
homes in the area.
I made the following comments:
~ 1. I don't know how 10 lots of reasonable configuration could
be platted with this vacation of 50 feet on either side of the
street, but would like to see the plat drawing of the area. I
don't believe the City would want a series of long, narrow lots
alongside either side of the street.
2 . I don't believe the City should request vacation of only
a portion of the easement, but all of it and only after Mr. John
Kenna has filed with the County whatever is necessary to release
his first right to the property should the county vacate the
easement. Mr. Kenna is the fee owner of the triangle area in the
Northeast corner of the intersection of Old Snelling and County
Road E. If the County were to vacate a portion of the easement,
this action would set a precedent and Mr. Kenna could request
vacation of the triangle area. He has petitioned the County for
that vacation twice during the past 15 years. Arden Hills
currently uses that area for passive recreation. Mr. Chapman knows
Mr. Kenna; I suggested he first see if Mr. Kenna would release his
interest as fee owner.
~
~
.
July 10, 1991
TO: Councilmembers
FROM: Dale Hicks
RE: Park dedication for What-A-Racquet Sports Courts, Inc.
Mr. Foster gave me the attached proposal for park dedication. I
discussed it with him and suggested the following changes.
1. Think 10% rather than 8%.
2. Consider interest on the delayed payment; he proposed
prime rate when we discussed this.
I also told Mr. Foster that we would accept his appraisers value
~ of the undeveloped property if we believe it to be reasonable.
If not, we would get another appraisal.
~
(J~: pac.tLt
'-fltolq L
'--",
, ,
4:
j.
"
.
To: Dale Hi<:ks
Arden Hills City Council
From: Dennis Foster
Wt'l a t -A-Rac ql\!?t Sports COL~rts, Inc.
Subject: Park Dedi cati on
Date: June 3!, 1992
The intent of th i ~5 memo is to address Section 22-9 of the Arden Hills
Municiple Code, Public Use Dedication, SLlb--sect i on (b) , Recreation C\nd
Conservation.
I. Pel"centage o.f Dedication.
Pc\l-agrC\ph (2) stC\tes "The percentage of dedication .. . shall not
e>(ceed 10X11 of the tract to be developed.
The sub-section also states II Iii determining the percentage of
dedication, the Ci ty Counci 1 shOll 1 take into consideration the C\mount
cof open spC\ce, park, recreati onC\l or commons areC\s and fC\cilities
which the developer hC\s designed into the proposed development for LIse
~ by OccLlpC\nts of the development. "
A. It is obvioLIS thC\t our entire development is designed for
llrec:reati anal" use.
B. It is also only good business sense for us to C\llow our
employees (occLlpants) free Lise of those facilities.
C. In a very similC\r fC\shion to a park, the central val Lie of our
development is to provide C\n opportunity for the surrounding
community to enjoy recreational activities. We are, in effect,
compC\rable to a park facil ity.
D. The maintenance cost of those facilities are born by us, not
the city.
E. Control Data (and others) have long used the western hC\1f of
the property for outdoor vall eybC\Il games, C\nd C\s 01 place to plC\nt
(Jardens. We :intend to ~ontinue to ~llow those uses!' not conly to
Contnol Di;:\ta~ but other companies and residents as well, C\t no
cost" (There wi 11 be " temporary interruption due to construction
C\ctivities. )
Si ncc-.I other park dedications, according to paragrC\ph (1) , range from
6% to 10%, we are asking the council to C\ccept an 8% dedication.
.II. Cash vs. Property.
PC\rC\grC\ph (4) of this section stC\tes "...the City Council mOlY reqL~i re
the developer to POlY the City, C\S C\n equivalent contribution, an
amOLtnt in cash equal to the percentage of 1 and. .". " OLlr development
.
plC\ns are such thC\t we C\re unable to donate land to the city, and
"
~
~!
.
sti II mC\int.in minimum llgreen-spacell requirements. Therefore, we C\re
C\sking the City to exercise its option, and accept cC\sh in 1 i eLl of
property.
I I I. Fair Market VC\l Lie.
Par'."graph (4) also states the amount of cash should be " eqLlal to the
pel"centC\ge of 1 and ... , multiplied by the fair market vC\I Lie of the
pr'c>pf.!rty at the time lJ'f finC\l approv,1\1 of the development
C\pplicC\tion."
A. The .pplicC\tion for this development wc\s submitted MOlY 11,
1992. The F'lanning Commission is scheduled to act on it June 3,
J.992, C\nd the City COLlnci I on June 8, 1992. There'fore, this would
define the tltime (fl"C\me) of final approval of the development
€:\ppl i cati onl'.
E<. F'C\rC\graph (4) states "The fair m.tr ket valLie of the property
",hC\ll be determined by reference to current apprC\isC\I dC\tc\ .. . "
.
I hC\ve attached a copy of 01 portion of an appraisC\I from Approai SOIl
Research Associates, LTD. , completed C\nd dC\ted May 20, 1992. This
obviously meet. the Iltime (frC\me) of fi nal approval" by the City.
The C\pprC\isC\l, although secured for a different purpose, ShOLIl d
~ C\ccurately define the mC\rket val Lte of the property. It wc\s
completed by a I ocC\l , well'-estC\bl i shed firm, according to all
C\ppropriC\te Appraisal guidelines (such as FIERREA, OCC, C\nd
LJSPAF') . As stated in the document cover letter, the apprC\isers
"have no personal i nter'est or biC\s with respect to the subject
matter " C\nd on PC\ge 10, It\?m lO!, "The t:ompensati on for this
.. . ,
I"eport is NOT contingent Llpon the reporting of a pre determined
val Lie "
.. . .
The C\pprC\isers went on to compare this property to five other
recent vC\cC\nt lC\nd sC\les of comparC\ble size, 10cC\tion, use, etc.
(pC\ges 30 to 41 of attached C\pprC\isal). Their conclLtsion, C\s
shown, is thC\t the property has a current fair mad(et vC\lue of
$420,0(>0.
We ar'e aski ng the Council to C\ccept this figLJre for PC\rk Dedication
cC\lculations.
IV. P."yment S<:hedule.
As with many new business developments, cC\sh--'f I ow is of very high
concern to us. We are 01 new corporation, and have very limited
l'''e:~!5P-rYes . Therefore, we are asking ,for
A) A si>: -month delC\y in the pC\yment of these funds
~ 8) A monthly payment of $10,000 per month, starting December 1,
1992.
Therefore, if the totC\I dedication is $33,600, pC\yments of $10,000
would be made December 1, 1992, JC\nuary 1 and FebrLtC\ry 1, 1993, and a
fi nal payment of $3,60(> on March 1. 1993. '.
-
F .if
.-.'- ,1
.
Please let me knc)w if this adequC\tely fulfills the Park Dedication
requirements of the City.
Dennis Foster
~ ,~~/
~:,:;;u~ /,,;/ ~
~
.
.
.
APPRAISAL OF:
That Proposed Tennis Club,
Located At 4155 Lexington Avenue North,
Arden Hills, Minnesota
~
VALUATION DATE: May 20, 1992
Kevin D. Baker, Appraiser
William Jo Peterson, SRAjSRPA
APPRAISAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, LTD.
2310 West County Road D
NeVi Bri.ghton. I'1innesota 55112
(612) 636-2565
~
I
~
,\
,-
J
l
,
; APPRAISAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, LTD.
1
STEVENSON-EDWARDS & ASSOCIATES
! 2310 County Road D . New Brir:hton. r-.1innesota 55112
i
I (612) 636-2565 FAX: (612) 63J-0394 (612) 633-0779
i May 28, 1992
I
I
I
I
i Mr. Dennis Foster
I 1415 Arden Oaks Drive
I Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112
I RE: 4155 Lexington Avenue North
Arden Hills, Minnesota
I
! Dear Mr. Foster:
!
I
; In accordance with request, we have completed an
I your
i appraisal of the above referenced property for the purpose
I
i of estimating its probable market value in the fee simple
I interest. The following written report presents the
, findings, analysis and conclusions of this appraisal. We
i
j ~ have made a complete inspection of the subject property and
i have fully identified the real estate in our written report.
I
i
I
After careful consideration of the many factors influencing
i valuer it is our opinion that the subject property has a
value, as of May 20, 1992, based on the financing described
; herein, of: 9\tJ(,
i
! V 01
; T.Q1CAL FINAL ES.l'.J:Mll,TE OF VALUE: (t I ~ N/
,
Market Value: ~ \ 1
! One Million Six Hundred ~ ~ p V ~t-\y
! Thousand DOllar~ ~
$1,600,000 S CfJ
\ ~t~
i
We have no personal interest or bias with respect to the
subjec't matter of this appraj ::;31 report 0:: th~ p:J::-tlcs
involved. The cppraisal is made subject to CCI't3.:.r:
assumptions and limiting conditions which are listed in this
report. It conforms with accepted professionnl, ethical and
performance standards of the real estate appraisal pr8ctice.
If you have any questions or comments after reading this
,~ appraisal, please contact us.
This report conforms to the Appraisal guidelines set forth
by, FIERREA. the OCC, and the USPAP, as we understand those
guidelines.
\
-)
. The undersigned appraiser certifies that he/she has
personally inspected the property and has investigated
information believed to be pertinent to the valuation of the
property, and to the best of his knowledge and belief, the
statements and opinions expressed herein are correct and
reasonable, subject to the limiting conditions set forth
herein.
APPRAISAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, LTD.
Certified to this day of May 28, 1992.
/7/. /7 ~
I~--/ '- / /.-'
f-___.. ~<,,/c _ _/_ --_
Kevin D-; Baker, Apprgi
I /
\..0
/SRPA
.
:~
)
~ SllMM~OF SALIENT DATA
\ LOCATION:
4155 Lexington Avenue North,
Arden Hills, Minnesota
~
\
II SUBJECT PHOTO: II
TYPE OF PROPERTY: Proposed Tennis Facility
LAND SIZE: 8.74 Acres
ZONING: Industrial
DATE OF INSPECTION: May 20, 1992
PROPERTY RIGHTS APPRAISED: Fee simple interest
DATE OF LAST TRANSACTION: None within the last three
years
,. TYPE OF TRANSACTION: NIA
SALES PRICE, IF KNOWN: N/A
)
1
_.~.
..
:'
~
TOTAL 1992 REAL ESTATE TAXES: $23,427.66*
GROSS BUILDING SIZE: 10,050 SF Locker Rooms and
Racquet Ball Courts
62,940 SF Tennis Bubbles
* The taxes and assessors estimated market value are for
only the eastern half of the subject property. According
to Ramsey County Records, the western half is still a part
of a larger parcel and has not been divided.
VAkQE ESTIMATED BY:
COST APPROACH: $1,600,000
MARKET DATA APPROACH: N/A
ECONOMIC APPROACH: N/A
)
FINAL VALUE ESTIMATE COMPOSED OF:
. LAND VALUE:
~ VALUE:
TOTAL MARKET VALUE: SI,600,OOO
TIL't8L-EilIJ\.~s.l'l..MA TE OF VALUE:
Market Value:
) One Million Six Hundred
Thousand Dollars
$1,600,000
.
.
.
) ~
.:}.
. ERQEERTY IDENTIFICATION
ADDRESS: 4155 Lexington Avenue North,
Arden Hills, Minnesota
USE CATEGORY: Tennis and Racquetball Facility
IMPROVED: The subject site is currently vacant
but is proposed for a tennis and
racquetball facility. The proposed
improvements include a 10,050 square
foot locker room and racquetball
building and two air supported
structures for tennis courts containing
62,940 square feet.
THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
See Site Plan in Addendum
CURRENT TAXES: $23,427.66*
. ASSESSORS ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE: $399,000*
PID NUMBER: 22-30-23-44-0003 and
a portion of 22-30-23-
41-0002
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT INFORMATION:
The subject is valued as Free and Clear
., FLOOD ZONE: Not located within a
flood prone area per
Community Panel Number
270375 0001 B for the
City of Arden Hills,
Minnesota.
CENSUS TRACT: Tract #408.01
* The taxes and assessors estimated market value are for
only the eastern half of the subject property. According
to Ramsey County Records, the western half is still a part
of a larger parcel and has not been divided.
'.
5
)
-
~
.
PACKET INFORMATION
FOR WEEK OF:
JULY 6 TO 10, 1992
.----..
.
.
,
'" om. ., .
, '"
. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
MEHEANDUM
mTE: July 2, 1992
TO: . Mayor and city Counoil
FRCM: John T. Buc:kley, Parks Director \Jf&
SUBJ:EX:T : Parks 6< ReCreation weekly Report
ARMY RESERVE CENTER:
Paul Amacher, Army Reserve Center Coordinator, has stated that the Army would be
willing to consider CamImmity use of the Center.
cindy Severtson and I will be meeting with Mr. Amacher to schedule use of the
Center for Fall program activities.
PARK AND TRAIL IMPROVEMENT PROJECI'S:
Park Maintenance =ew rebJ.ilt the bridge on the CUmmings to Hainline Avenue Trail
after the <XllI1pletion of the paving project.
~ The Bridge connecting the Olatham Avenue cul-de-sac to the Valentine Hills School
trail was also rebJ.ilt by the Ramsey County "Volunteer" =ew this past week.
The Sunnner Crew is in the pr=ess of inspecting and repairing the tennis practice
boards at Floral, CUmmings, Hazelnut, and Valentine Parks.
JUNE EVALUATION:
At my aruma I review in January, 1992, a June evaluation was tentatively
scheduled. To date, this June review has not been scheduled.
If the Council should have any questions or concerns, please contact me.
JTB/ts
~
'"'
. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
~
DM'E: .JUly 9, 1992
TO: Mayor and city Council
FRCM: Dan Winkel, Public Works superintendent ~
SUBJECr: Public Works Weekly Report
This week, the Public Works crew read residential water meters and carrg:Jleted
the task on 'I\1esday. Repairs to the meters will be carrg:Jleted in two weeks.
'll1e jetter truck was used to clean the area north of I -694 and will be
conplet€d next week. 'll1e entire southern area of town was carrg:Jleted last
year.
This week, two members of the crew were out on vacation and one member was out
due to illness.
On Monday and 'I\1esday, the water level at Keithson Pond was lowered. 'll1e
rains received last week raised the pond to a fairly high level.
. The Tiller Lane reconstruction project is moving along very well. The suJ::cut
portion of the job will be conplete this week. CUrb and gutter work will
begin on Friday or possibly on Monday of next week.
Mark Graham and I met with representatives from New Brighton and both
rerilering plants in New Brighton. Apparently, a storm sewer line originates
at the old rendering plant site in Arden Hills, that runs into New Brighton
and enq;Jties into I.Dng Lake, has deteri=ated at the SUburban L.P. Gas site and
is causing major damage to their facility. 'll1e Merilelkoch Co. is the main
user of this storm sewer, rot because the line originates in Arden Hills,
Merilelkoch 're::ruested Arden Hills to participate in the repairs to the
facilities at SUburban Gas. We told Mendelkoch co. we believe the line is not
=ently used by anyone in Arden Hills and the City would not be interested
in paying for repair work on the line. 'll1e City may have to abandon and fill
the line on our side of 1-35W to guarantee the line is not in use by anyone
else. 'll1e only question that rerrains is the possible use by S.T.S. steel Co.
(this is the old Minnesota Diversified Building) . We will keep you posted as
to our findings.
If the Council should have any questions or =ncerns, please =ntact me.
OO/ts
~
, ..
~ 1992 GOALS
2ND QUARTERLY REPORT
PARKS DIRECTOR - JOHN T. BUCKLEY
PROPOSED
GOALS COMPLETION PROGRESS TO DATE
DEVELOP MAINTENANCE STANDARD:
Develop Maintenance Schedule System Park maintenance crew is
Turf Maintenance Implement. following a weekly
Adult Softball Facilities May 1 maintenance schedule for:
Youth Softball Facilities Turf Maintenance
Soccer Fields Written Softball Facilities
Standards Soccer FieldS
Playground Structures Manual Playground Structure
Bask~tball/Tennis Courts Completed Inspections
May 1 BB/Tennis Court
General Skating/Hockey
Hockey Lighting
Warming Shelter
TRAILS:
Cummings/Floral Trail May/June Bituminous Construction
~ Improvement Completion:
Completed the paving of
cummings/Floral Trail
in early June.
Additional trail work was
completed at Hazelnut Park
under the same contract
agreement.
Trail Maintenance Grass trails are mowed
twice a month.
Paved trails have been
swept or blown this Spring.
Sidewalk boulevards are
mowed weekly. (Lexington
and Hamline) .
Bridges: Park crew rebuilt
the bridge on Cummings
Trail.
Ramsey County "Volunteers"
rebuilt the bridge from
~ Chatham Cul-de-sac to
Valentine Hills School.
. ,.
~ 1992 GOALS
QUARTERLY REPORT
PARKS DIRECTOR - JOHN T. BUCKLEY
PAGE TWO
PROPOSED
GOALS COMPLETION PROGRESS TO DATE
CITY PRIDE PROGRAMS:
Arbor Day April 25 seventy-five youth and
adults representing
Boy Scouts, Girl Scouts,
students, service clubs
and neighborhood groups,
celebrated Arbor Day by
planting trees or seed-
lings on April 24 & 25.
county Road EjGateway May 16 Over 60 youth and
Flower Gardens adults participated in
the Flower Power
celebration on Saturday,
May 16.
Seven (7) businesses
~ planted gardens on County
Road E.
Flower Gardens May 16 Nine (9) gateway borders
were planted.
county Road E Banners May 16 Street Banners were
delivered June 5. Banners
were put up during the
week of June 8.
PROGRAMS AND SERVICES:
Youth Coaches Training Fifty (50) T-Ball, Youth
Softball-Girls Fast Pitch
& Boys Babe Ruth coaches
attended the NYSCA
Counselor Training Program
on May 27 and 28. Cynthia
Severtson conducted the
training program.
Light Brigade, Inc. paid
the $15.00 registration
fee for the coaches.
~
. ,
. 1992 GOALS
QUARTERLY REPORT
PARKS DIRECTOR - JOHN T. BUCKLEY
PAGE THREE
PROPOSED
GOALS COMPLETION PROGRESS TO DATE
ARDEN HILLS WELLNESS PROGRAM:
Organize Employee April 15 Tery Shields and Mike
Wellness Committee McKinney have expressed
interest in serving on
Wellness committee.
The Wellness Committee has
not met to date.
Army Reserve Center Use Arden Hills Staff and
Council members toured the
Reserve Center on Monday,
April 20.
Army Officials have
expressed a willingness
to open the Center to
. Community Groups.
Ms. Severtson and I will
be meeting with Army
Representative, Paul
Amacher, to discuss use of
the Center for Fall
Program activities.
LONG TERM' GOALS
Ingerson Park Access No progress to date.
Arsenal Athletic Complex I have continued
communications with
Commander, Ted schulte,
regarding the proposed
athletic complex.
I have had conversations
with Phil Cohen (Aid to
Senator David Durenberger)
regarding the status of the
Arsenal property.
I have contacted Bruce
. Vento's office regarding
the status of the Arsenal
property.
, .
~ 1992 GOALS
QUARTERLY REPORT
PARKS DIRECTOR - JOHN T. BUCKLEY
PAGE FOUR
PROPOSED
GOALS COMPLETION PROGRESS TO DATE
Arsenal Athletic Complex The fact that the Army
(Continued) has down-graded the
Arsenal from inactive plant
with a mobilization re-
quirement to caretaker
status (due to budget cuts)
may indicate a change in
Army policy regarding the
Arsenal.
.
.
f ~
1992 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
. QUARTERLY UPDATE
PUBLIC WORKS SUPERINTENDENT
JULY 10, 1992
. CONCLUDE THE WATER LOSS PROBLEM BY DECEMBER. 1992
The commercial meters have been certified, and we have also
conducted the backflow tests on the master meter pits. The
backflow study shows no water flowing backwards into
Roseville. The second quarter water report will show us as to
what degree we still have a loss. The Council will be updated
as to the next step that we might proceed with.
. PUBLIC WORKS EMPLOYEES EVALUATIONS BY NOVEMBER 1. 1992
All of the positions descriptions are now completed and
evaluations will be performed as soon as possible.
. OBTAIN WASTE WATER AND A WATER OPERATOR LICENSE BY MAY 1.
1992.
I have passed both tests and obtained a Class "D" license for
Waste Water Management and also Domestic Water Operations.
. COMPLETE AN INVENTORY OF PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY
~ (DUE BY OCTOBER 1. 1992)
The maj or equipment inventory has been completed, and the
smaller hand tool inventory should be completed by October 1.
We are also attempting to inventory all other miscellaneous
shop and building supplies.
. ESTABLISH SAFETY COMMITTEE BY JUNE 1. 1992
Don Zehm, the City'S Safety Consultant, was ill during April
and May. We are hoping that he can participate on this
Committee. Most of the information has been gathered and Mr.
Zehm will discuss with Committee Members as soon as possible.
. ATTENDANCE AT MANAGEMENT AND TRAINING SEMINARS
I attended two seminars during the first quarters, and have
not had the opportunity to schedule additional training.
. MONITOR THE PROGRESS OF THE NEW CITY HALL/PUBLIC WORKS
FACILITIES
I have spent much time with the selected architects reviewing
plans and existing buildings. I have attended all of the
planning meetings with the council, Architects, and staff
~ attempting to design the appropriate facility that will meet
our needs.
, ~
. 1992 GOALS/OBJECTIVES
2BD QUARTERLY REPORT
PUBLIC WORKS SUPERINTENDENT
PAGE TWO
. ACCOMPLISH REPAINTING AND IDENTIFICATION OF THE FLEET BY JUNE
1. 1992.
All of the vehicles have been painted and are awaiting the
installation of the new decals. The decals were ordered and
delivered, but did not meet the standards that were
established. The new decals will be ordered shortly and
installed when they arrive. The original decals will be kept
and used to mark miscellaneous equipment that was not going to
be originally marked.
. PREPARATION OF THE 1993 OPERATING BUDGET BY JUNE 1. 1992
I have met with Terry Post, Temporary City Accountant to
discuss various items on the 1993 Budget. He stated toward
the end of July, we will be working towards a completion for
the 1993 budget.
. EVALUATION OF INFRASTRUCTURE CONDITIONS DUE BY DECEMBER 1.
1992
~ The Pavement Management Plan will be updated very shortly.
The consulting engineers will have someone available shortly
to assist us with gathering this information. A draft copy of
the storm Water Drainage Plan has already been submitted for
the Council's review. The final report should be completed
soon. I am also trying to put together a report as to the
conditions of our watermain system and also our sanitary
sewer.
~
. ...
. THE EVEREST GROUP LTD
June 30, 1992
Tom Sather
Mayor
city of Arden Hills
1450 West Highway 96
Arden Hills, MN 55112
Re: Arden Hills Development Property located in the
Northeast Quadrant of the Intersection of Interstate
Highways 694 and 35W
Dear Tom:
This letter is written to follow up on, and to pursue more
formally, our recent discussions concerning the potential
~ development of the noted property. I have set forth below
our thoughts regarding the development potential of the
site, as well as our proposal with respect thereto.
Development Potential
The subject property has a number of unique positive
characteristics and a number of limiting negative features
which, together, significantly influence the development
potential of the property. The posi ti ve characteristics
include a reasonably good location within the metropolitan
area, proximity to an easily identifiable interstate freeway
intersection, good visibility, and sufficient size to permit
planned development. The negative features include
difficult access, potential soils and hazardous waste
problems, proximity to undesirable uses (e.g. antenna,
former rendering plant, etc.) and inflated value
expectations by certain land owners.
While the real estate development market is generally soft,
we feel that limited opportunities currently exist and will
continue to exist in the marketplace. We are confident that
desirable tenants and owner occupants can be attracted to
~ development on the property, if the property is positioned
,., correctly both on a use and on an economic basis.
2685 Long Lake Road C!(!/ ~ t
P.O. Box 130190. Rosevillc, MN 55113 7/;0/9-'}
(612) 636-5500 <><-...
04
Historically, properties in this area and of this nature,
. have successfully supported mixed use business park type
development with uses ranging from light industrial to
office. A good example of this type of development would be
our Mounds View Business Park project. We do not feel,
based upon our experience in and observation of the
marketplace, that the site can support office, hotel, or
other higher intensity forms of development.
Based upon the characteristics of the site and the market
for property in the area, we feel that the highest and best
use, and in practical terms the only feasible use, for the
property will be a mixed use business park similar to our
Mounds View Business Park project. The development site can
accommodate approximately 1,050,000 - 1,200,000 square feet
of developable space depending upon the nature of use and
building layout. A preliminary concept plan is attached
which shows both the level of development as well as an
effective site layout.
city Participation
A key element in realizing the development potential of the
site will be the cooperation and participation of the city.
At this time, most of the communities surrounding
Arden Hills are offering tax increment financing and other
~ incentives to attract and facilitate development.
Additionally, most of the same cities have become proactive
in the development process creating an environment of
cooperation and assistance which acts to facilitate rather
that impede development. Absent such city involvement, the
development potential of the site is diminished
substantially and would not justify expenditure of time or
money for proper marketing.
Proposed Development Aoreement
In view of the foregoing, we would propose that the city and
Everest enter into a Development Agreement which would
contemplate cooperation, joint effort, and joint
participation in the planning, marketing, acquisition and
development of the property. The basic elements of
agreement would be, as follows:
1. If not already in place, the city will create or agree
to create a redevelopment district or an economic
development district, as permitted by applicable law,
for the purpose of making tax increment financing
available to assist and facilitate development.
.
..
. ..
2 . The city will grant Everest the exclusive TIP supported
. development rights with respect to the property for a
period of five years. Depending upon achievement of
certain reasonable performance levels, Everest would
have an option to extend the term of agreement for an
additional five years.
3 . Everest, with the input, participation and approval of
the City, will undertake and complete preliminary
planning for development of the property. The goal of
this preliminary planning will be to achieve a
comprehensive plan encompassing the entire site.
Obviously, the plan will need to be established in a
manner that satisfies the objectives of the city, while
at the same time meeting the demands of the
marketplace. The preliminary plan included with this
correspondence is, in our opinion, a workable plan
given the various competing considerations.
4. Everest will actively and aggressively market the
property to desirable prospects, including potential
tenants and build to suit users. When appropriate, and
where the mutual goals of Everest and the City can be
achieved, Everest will proceed with acquisition of
necessary land and development thereof, all consistent
with the agreed preliminary plan.
. 5. The incremental taxes generated by the new development
created on the property, would be paid to Everest for a
period equal to the full term of the development
district or, until Everest was fully reimbursed for
qualifying development costs (including land write
down) , whichever first occurred.
6. After payment of incremental taxes to Everest, any
future increment would be paid to the City for
application or distribution in such manner as the city
deems appropriate.
The foregoing represents a bare bones outline of the
respective rights and obligations of the parties under the
proposed Development Agreement. Obviously, more specific
terms will need to be discussed. Nevertheless, the above
outline does address what we deem to be the key elements of
agreement, and should form an adequate basis for further
discussion. In our view, it is only with this form of
agreement, that the property can be effectively developed in
the foreseeable future.
After you have had an opportunity to review and consider the
foregoing, please contact me to share your thoughts and
~ comments. We are most interested in proceeding on the
foregoing as quickly and efficiently as possible, and we
,., .. . ,
anticipate presenting this proposal to the full Council at
. its next agenda session. I look forward to hearing from you
at your convenience. Thank you for your continuing
cooperation and assistance herein.
Best regards,
TH~~T GROUP, LTD.
C. William Franke
President
Enclosure
CWF/jk
~
~
..
.
aS~ociation of
catherine Iago me ropolitan
Acting Administrator municIpalities
80 W Hwy 96
Arden Hills, MN 55112-5794
June 29, 1992
Dear Catherine,
cities have reached a critical juncture at the Legislature. state
officials seem to believe that cities' financial resources can provide
the answer to the state's continual funding problems.
We want to know your view about what direction the Association of
Metropolitan Municipalities should take during 1993 to help protect
cities from further legislative intrusion on our tax base. To provide
you with a forum for your opinions and concerns on this and other
issues, we are planning our seventh annual Outreach Breakfast for you
. and other city officials in your area.
The breakfast is scheduled for July 23 at 7:30 a.m. in the Imperial
Room at the Ramada Inn, formerly McGuire's, 1201 W. County Road E,
Arden Hills. It is located on the NW corner of County Road E and
Lexington, one-half mile south of Interstate-694jLexington
interchange.
Please R.S.VoP. to Carol or Nicole by noon, July 20.
The AMM would like your input on the following concerns:
* Metropolitan issu~s such as storm water management, water supply
and general Metropolitan Council authority;
* Legislative matters such as LGA and HACA distribution, the Local
Government Trust Fund, transportation and transit concerns, local
options for city revenues and regional sewer financing;
* Seeking commitments from legislative candidates regarding their
views toward city issues.
* The Metropolitan Governance Task Force's preliminary report on the
Metropolitan Council and the Task Force's view of the Council's role
in the region.
. This is not a formal gathering and we hope for lots of
discussion from you, because your opinions, concerns and advice will
help shape AMM's policies and priorities for the 1993 session
183 university avenue east, sl. paul, minnesota 55101 (612) 227-4008
The breakfast also can be an avenue for you to tell us what you'd ~
like to see the AMM do by way of member services. Are there other
support services that we should provide, or improvements to current
services that you can suggest?
We hope you plan to attend the July 23 breakfast at the Ramada Inn in
Arden Hills. We would ask that managers make this information
available for and extend this invitation to city council members. As
always, if you have any questions, don't hesitate to call the AMM
office.
Sincerely,
~- ~ jJ/"~<-oV -;/. tS ~
Karen Anderson, AMM President Bill Burns
Minnetonka Council AMM Board member
Fridley Manager
~ CJvJd0-
Dave Childs
AMM Board member .
New Brighton Manager
~
.....
. CITY OF 1\RDEN HILI8
ME2oDWlOOM
IllITE : JUly 7, 1992
TO: Mayor and city council
FRCI!: : Tery shields, 1\dmi.ni.strative secretary V'
su:BJElCI' : Planner Bergly - rnvolvement in CPI Landscape Dnprovanents
Attached is a letter dated June 22, 1992, from Planner John Bergly
regarding his participation in developing landscape improvements for
CPI.
The issue is one of independence - can Mr. Bergly adequately discharge
his responsibilities as Planner for the city while, at the same time,
providing landscape design services for client and corporate resident,
cpr? As an ethical professional, Planner Bergly is informing the city
of a potential perceived conflict of interest issue and seeks staff or
council input if there are concerns.
. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact either Planner
Bergly or Cathy on Monday, July 13.
Its
Attachment
.
. ...
SANDERS LANDSCAPE 365 East Kellogg Boulevard
WACKER ARCHITECTS Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101
WEHRMAN AND 612-221-0401
BERGLV PLANNERS Fax 612-297-6817
June 22, 1992
City of Arden Hills
Ms. Cathy lago
1450 West Highway 96 I
I
Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112
Cathy,
In the approval of Case #91-06, cpr Fence Variance, the City Council action directed me to work
with CPI in developing an acceptable landscaping plan in conjunction with the fence. While
;working with CPI in this regard, CPI indicated they would like our assistance in developing similar
landscape improvements on other parts of the site. I discussed this possibility with Gary. He felt
that as long as we were involved with site enhancements, there in fact may be advantages to our
working with them - like our work on the fence. RSP Architects, Inc. is being billed directly for
our time. Landscape improvements along the fence, at the County F corners of the site and at the
main building entrances off Hamline A venue are projects showing our involvement. I urge you to
visit the site and see the improvements.
CPI is now getting into the design stages of their next building. One of the architectural firms being
considered, has asked me if our firm can provide site planning and planting plan consultation during
the design stage. Our fees would be billed directly to the architect.
Ordinarily this type of pre-application consultation (in projects of this scope it could be extensive),
land owners are not billed for my time - either directly or through the City. So there would be
some financial advantage for the City. The other advantage would be that the City's interest would
be incorporated into the plans at an early design stage instead of requiring plan changes at the
normal City review and approval stageo
CPI has shown through the years that they are not satisfied with merely meeting minimum
I requirements and that they are very willing to cooperate with the City to achieve a showplace
campuso So cpr s interest in the proposed arrangement is not to find shortcuts or to influence the
City's decision - but rather to fully incorporate the City's concerns throughout the planning process
and to assure that they have top quality landscape architects involved.
I will be happy to discuss this further with you individually or with any of the Council Members.
Please call if you have any questions.
,
ACKER WEHRMAN BERGLY, INC.
John O. Bergly
. ..
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
. MEXIll\NIlUM
DATE: July 8, 1992
'IU: Mayor and Colmcil, catherine Iago, Fran Holmes
~@ Terry Post, TEmpOrary City Accountant
SUBJEX::T : Revised city Hall/PUblic works Lease VB. G.O. Bond cash Flow
Analysis
Mr. Truszinski of Juran & Moody, Inc. prepared a cash flow analysis on May 25,
1992 that essentially highlighted the differences between financing a
$2,000,000 Capital Project on a General Obligation Bond versus a Municipal
Lease basis.
Mr. Truszinski was asked to rerun the analysis using the following assumption
changes :
1. ~ capital projects of two sizes - $2,000,000 and $3,000,000.
.
2. ~ more representative market valuations of homesteads in
Arden Hills were $100K, $125K and $150K instead of $60K, $75K
and $100K.
3. ~ more representative market valuations of Commercial
and Industrial Property were $200K, $500K and $1000K, instead of
$100K, $250K and $500K.
4. Given knowledge of Arden Hills credit rating and recent
changes in debt markets, use a more realistic coupon rate.
The results of these revised analyses (see attached) are summarized
below:
~
, .
~1W)
$2 MILLION PRO.JE.:::r $3 MILLION PROJECT
G.O. BOND MUNICIPAL LEZlSE G.O. BOND MUN. LEASE
~ ( fr) (c..) 0))
DFSCRIPI'ION 5/26/92 7 6 92 5/26/92 7/6/92 7/6/92 7/6/92
Term 20 YRS 20 YRS 20 YRS 20 YRS 20 YRS 20 YRS
Avg Annual Debt Serv $191K $187K $193K $193K $279K $2851<
Est. Avg Coupon Rate 6.232% 5.959% 6.334% 6.295% 5.958% 6.348%
Avg. Annual Property
Tax In=ease (Before
Homestead Credit)
for HCMESI'EAD Prooertv
- $100K MV $40 $39 $23 $22 $58 $32
- $125K MV N/A $49 N/A $31 $73 $46
- $150K MV N/A $59 N/A $42 $88 $62
Avg. Annual Property Tax
~ease on Connnercial/
trial Prooertv
- $200K MV N/A $79 N/A $162 $117 $239
- $500K MV $202 $197 $407 $406 $292 $599
- $lOOOK MV N/A $394 N/A $811 $584 $1197
'Ibis information is provided to familiarize everyone with approx:i1nate :i1npa.cts
on city Debt Service requirements, Homestead Property Tax in=eases, and
Corrrrnercial/Industrial Property Tax in=eases depending upon project size and
financing alternative chosen.
TP:rk
attachments
.
- -------- --------- u_ --------
-
8 ~g;:2~gS:!~~;:;~~Qtgg~~;:S::::iS$8~1;\:i; ;~~~
..J o. N c\ vi ....: 00 ..,f 0. ..0 .... ox; . c\ vi ....: ~ ,..; o:i..,j 0 d ....:,f"f l'-I'l ....1
,,~ ~s;( 00000>.0-.0\0'>0-.0-.0-.0-.;1;0'>00.000-0\<7>0.<;>' let-..., ~':
~ 0: <:s M....,..,.................... M .... .... ,.., M -:t <"1 .... ,.., <"":.., :Zl>:~. I.." "'I
f-...; I I I
~~ I' r I r;... iJ~
0',:., I I .--""" ~ ;;-
~ z S< 00 -.:!" N r- M '" .... .... r- 00 ..... oN "i" V"l '" 0\ r- 0 on gi.... ..., I I "--4..- ~
,...:, 0: .... on 00 00 0 0 .... .... ~ 0 .... 0'\ 0-. '" '" '" f"< M.... I:....., ~ ;.-. i'
a <<:I,....: ..,f S vi ~ r..: vi oci >6 ~ ~ c\ s: 0 e<:i 0.6 c\ r..: on c;~.".;: I I ~ Q ~
~ ..J 8 ::::::: _ ::: ::: ::: ::: ::: ::: :::: _ ::: .... fl S ::: ::: s: s i...~ J I 0 Z '"
~ :;:; 11""<. 1,_ I Q N 0 ~
~ r-' M ............ ..".... 1:0 '" _,..;- 0:. ~ l~ I ~ ~ ~ 0
~ ~ :J; ~ ;;; : ~ : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;: d ~ ~ ~ ~ ;; ~ :6 ~ l~ Wi Z ~ ;.l; ~
6: ~ 8 r- r:: r- r- r- r- r- r- r- r- ,~ r- r- 00 r- r- r- r- r- s; ..... :z ~: d :::: ~ fl
8 U 12 ~I =: ~ ::;; ...:.
1::;;>1
,e f" ;;
Iw Ur ~
P ID &r a
-0:( SO! OJ) '" '-I'l '" .... N ,.., :t V"l '" M 00 00 0> g .... 00 r;o. I~ ~l !::l
~ ~ o. ~;;};;! ~ ~ ~ ;::; c\ ~ ~ ;;:; ~ ~ ;; c\ ~ :; ~ IU-l I :;:
o f/l 0 V"l '-I'l V"l '-I'l ..... V'1 ....., '" V"l '-I'l V"l V'l '" '" OJ") Vl ...... on ,> 1;;, ~
~ Ul""" <l' /- ......
~;; 10 01 ~
o 100 @r
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ iA ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 :~ ~: I.
z :3 vi ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9;' q ~ l~ ~I
~ ;; ~ I~ ~I
l-< '---'
t2~ ~:;;~~~~$~~~~~~q~~~~~ _ (:.l
~~ oooo~~~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~ ~z.
_ ~o ~M~M~~~M~MMMM~MMM~M o6~
"" ... 0 ~ "
~ ~~ ~ 2~ol-<
"'-I ::r: u ~ 1il
~~~~~~~$$~$~&~&&&$&~~&&& ~ ~~~~
<<~'o&:&:;g&,:g;gg~~~cito;ggs.:.~g:~c:: LiJ 81-:'-:1::
~~l-<~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ r'~~3
~~ 00000000000000000000 = ~. 1-<0
~ Z l-<. ~L~W
~ <'> ~; UJo~~
o >-l L1l ;>-0 t w U L1l
<'> ..1 p) t.1l l-< u
~~@~88S~~~~~88~~~~~g~~~~ ~ ~~ ~O~~~ <
~ "'-I800'OoN"'r--....<'>"'r-....o_rl~"''''rl'1-on 0 w:,. if) if)
~~~~8-~~~~0~~~~~~~0~~~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~
gi>LiJ .....~::fi:..8l;;(:::f..'t::r--ooo.;;~re~r;:ps~g 0 -i.o t.:ll--<S: :.w
~<~~ ~o~6~~~~~~~6000~~M~M ~ ~Q ~~~~ -
~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ b ~z 2~0~ <
~~ & ~ ~~ ~~8~ ~
..... ..... Z L1l -<..J"., ~ ,.;.;
~~~~8~~~8~~~~P8~~~~~88 ~ ~ ~z ~~~~~ ~;
~ 5~~~~$~~~~~~g$~~~~~~~~ ~ m ~5 p~6~~~ 3~
~ s ~:J6~~;:!-~~~66~~~M~~;ti~:s-.:6~ :::2 ~ .....,0 25' ~:;;c: :i2::
~ ~~~.....ooooOO_....._<'>MM"'.or--~~O L1l ~ --< ~~ffi2<'> w~
o ~ _....................______..........__.....___rl ~ ~ ~~ =~~~ ~~
... IJl V 0 CI =:0 -o:?QI- 1-::':
.. ~o g~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~
~ z~ffi~~~~~~~~~~~~~~E~~~g~~~ ~
o s ~~eS~~~~~~ ~~M~~~dg~dddgd :
~.... t!. ~
o Uj ~ o<! (5
:: p g ~ ~ .. d
~ x~88888888888888g8888888 ~ ~ ., ~~~Q
<:;I ~ ~~ggggggggggggggggggggdg ~ ~ t .. ~1~~
!-< ::c: ..... 0000000000000000000 0 <I) <I) U-l Z j!'-'~<
O~ ~ o~oo0~0oo~~oo0~~ocio ~ Q Q ~ 0 '\z~~
.... ooooo-.o..o-.r:;..o..oooO.....----<<'>N<'>'O Z Z Ll-l ~ Vr''''':
~D _______oN<'>NoNoNoN<'>oN<'>rlrlrl ~ 0 6 ~ t ~~~~
~ z "" P:l P):::: 0 il- tl- I.:.:
~ =; 0 @ t;:; ~ ;('
:>: G g ~ ~ 00 00
~ZI(J~ -l~~ ~
~o- 6' ""t:6 'i
..J!:;( ~ ~~~
s: -< .(h ~
o u ~
;z _
w...l .,
Q o::l f-< ,-,
o::o?3 ~~8~~~gggsgs&&~5';88~~~JQ8~~8JQS:::5 g~88g88~~ I~I
-< ..J 0 0 vi ci ~ ~ ~ 9i ~ :;t 3 :$ ~ ~ ~ 171;r; ti ~ ~ ~ ~ i &3 O(j g ~ gg g 8 d $i g 8 ~ I~I
.<~ ~ '1-~~~~~~~~~~~q~~'1-~~~~~ q ~~~q$~q~~ I~I
o~ 6 E::: ~~s:-g,O;S:!"3,~~oog:5o:5~~8l;~~ ~ :;;~c::t~ ~f;j~ Ig:\
i: ~ 0:: ~ -< - - - - - ~ - -< <'> N oN <'> oN oN NoN"... <'> <'> ~ d '-' '-' '-' ~..... :a: A
........ <: I I Ul
U CI Q., , I I-
~~~8~~~~~~~~88888g88~5';88g - ~
b1:3~dr::r::r::~li~~~ggg~~:R~~g~g~~ t; m ~
@ ~ Ll-l 22~~~~02~~~d~~~~~~~~~ 5 I- ~
oN m <,>~~oooooooo~oo~~~~~~~~~o..~M ~ 0 me 7.
g: ---.....-<~_....-<-'-<~-----....--::::r :2 8;::)
- f:: -< A u..
<'>- 00 0000000000000 ~ ~ ~ ~
g:~ l-<~~~~~~~~~qqqqqqqq~~qqq 0 ~ ~ ~ ~
_~ ~or-r-r-r-r-r--r-r-ooO~"'''''''ONNO~O $'""' W Z ~ ~
~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~g~~~~~Sg:~~c ~_rn u.. 0 Ll-l ~
>Ll-l e w dd~~~~0~g~~g~~~~~~~~~ ~g~ ~ u ~ Z
-l&j ~ ~~===333 r--\O,,",~..;-......~-~ 0..60 ~ <I) ;.r, 13 ~
;;0 - ..... ~~~E;o~8o<l:j&
1;;(1) &&-!flflflf:&-tf':1:f~&~pJi'&-*&-&lPl!< ~::f'~g ..-r:~> ;:;; ~ ;.-:'g
~~w 8f:~~al8~g~r--i88S~~~~g ~ 7::!?:I-"<f."~~7.~ 8 ~ ci--t
G ~ ~ f-o -t- -t- -t- -t- -t- v) ,r; 'f) or; vi or; "1 >D Ii ,.0 ...,; ...,; -0 ...,; .~ ~ < ~ :-:l ~ t::: tJ .", W 'F 'F 1== '0"\
~ lJJ .... r_~ ~ ;:J ...... i:2 ~ 0 "" <I) " " v ""
. ~ iig)m~I.:J<I)ZZ~.-l ~ 8 ~:'"'
t>........!!30 G!=:;;::r.< z ~ ~.....
~l-< ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ $ $ $ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ * ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ d
o UJ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 <::> 0 8 2: 52.8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 ~ 0 ~ Co'l u.; L1l CI Cl CI A CI I- W 0 ~
> ..~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~q~~qqc:qc:c:qq~ ~~~~~ w~ww~~ ~ U~
"'~' _ - 0 <::> '" <::> '" 0 0 on .,., ~ .,., ~ ~ .,., ~ ~.....,... f-o ,-. l-< f-o -
~~~ ~ ~~ ~~r-r-~i~~S3=~~~~~~~~~ ti~8e~~~~~~~b~ j ~~
~~~ ~~ <'> ~<~ ~.-l~~~~~. ~ Lv
Z<w 0.. ~~~~~~~E~~~g ~ ~~
lJJ~~ ~~-lCl lJJW WL1l<l)..-r: -< ~~
531=-.0 <,>...,..;-"'..or-OO~9"",,,,,......;-~~r--~0\0"""N v:-<
<00 ~g:g:~*~**~~8g8g88888888 <I)~
..WW;;: ________oN<'>oN<'>('l"'oN<'><'>MN<'>('l -<0
lJJ I--!- ....:. ~"'-'
~ d ;3 >- :S
0"" 0> \Q C'l _ ,.., .... r--.,.., 0\.... _ .... rll"!-ifi'
....l g ~ "! ~ ~ ~ '1 "1: <--! -: 't: ''1 ~ 4: "l: -to ~ I'll e,1
~ ..:; Q" r-: 4 ~ 0 C'l :! ~ ~ ~ N ':! l,f) ~ :g 8 s: I Ri ~I
E:. ~ 15 Ji ~ 00 &! U 00 00 00 00 00 00 g 00 00 00 00 (..0 "'I
<Il"; I I
~~ I I
. ZS;;: 0 O_-t.....o__"'-tr--t.....OO\O":tt--MVl I 1 ~
....,-l=S P --:C:'1<"!,,<'!-:C:~t;r-:<'!...!<'~""':"':-.r."1o' I I /. Lice:
g.~ d ~~~=i~~~S..~~~~ij811 " ~!~
~ z:l Vt -t -t""'. -t . -t ........ .... IUj I '-.---";..: Q
C 1;- I Q <Il
~ 8 ~ ~ ~ :! ~ ~ ~ ~ [:9 ~ i== S g ':g gs ~ f:': g.: =t ~ 8 l;i ~I g 2':: Q ~
Eo' ~ 0 c' ~ ~ :fi $ ~ :2 ~ ~ :$ ~ :3 t8 ::i g 8 ~ ~ c:; c:; \ ~ ~: ~ ~ ~ ,i,
'-' 0 ~ !3 ~ ~.... - .... .... .... - .... - .... .... .... .... .... - .... - .... .... 15 WI ~ ~ ~ ~
U ..0 '8 >1 -:r::' .-l C
;;: I , 61 ~ 8 6 ~
Q r I~ f;ll ;; l- '" -
-<C X: c:: 'I'l 0 (Xl f'"1 .... q.. .... 0\ l- l- lf1 .... 0 00 t-- .... 1..:( ~t
.-, ~ ~ ~ ';? ~ ~ ~ ::l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;; ~ ~ ~ :! ~ I ~ WI
o g"j ~ 0.. N -t -t .,.. -t ..,. -t -t '<t -t '<t oct -t "1" ..,. ..-t I:> tl >
'-'.... .... <I; .., 1< zl a:l ~
..>: -l.o't U IQ 01 [:::;:':l~ I
o . ILl: WI 53~!
:J::s:!~o .:-;<'IOo>r--t...l_'C-t,...,\Q"'-t-t....~("....O ,>->-, ~l~-~j
W15;.....&j OO...-,O"'....OOLrlC'l"'....o-t......OO<'la-............,..o 01;-<( -< ~ 1
Z:J .' . ..........:; N .....; ....; ....: ....: .....; ....: ....: .....; ....:; .....; <::> ....: d ci 0 0 ci 1:2 :21 c... .
"-' ~ E V; '" '" <"l ,.., ,.., '" ...., <"l M ,.., '" '" ,.., <"'"I ...-: "" <"'"I ,.., ,.., IF t;! ~
;.. V> 1[:3 ~I c...
~~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ ---' ffi :t Z ~
~<8 ~ ~~~~~~~~NNNNMMNMNNM ~ gd~
"-'A~ ~ orn
~ 0:: c: :.- .....
~ ~ u Z. ~
~t~~~~~~~~~&&~~~&~~~##~~# ~ ~~~ffi
~t<<8~N~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~8 b 8~r~
3 -<~~a~~~R~RP~~F$~~~~~~~~a ~ ~~~~
....,. ~ uo--...........-----......--.... ........._......_ ..J 0::.....0
(] i= :3 ~6~~
~ ~e3 >-EGfj _
~ ~~ wO.....u .....l
~t@ s-~~v ~ 8~~~3~~~~ ~ .....:2 ~~~~ <
~b~~g~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.... 2 wB ~=>-m ~
~z<.....l-8=~~~~~R~~~~8N~~~~~2 - WUJ .....bZ~ ...
::.::~c...< "-o:'L"l.v.""!.\i)_~.1:<.O.-.Nl"l"l~.r-~.O.-.N_"'". ~ OA o.....<~ F
~ u-<;:- =====;:::;:::=~~s!~~~:SS!:l~!:l~ ;::: zo ~::;o::oo:: :::
!- ..: 7. ex:":" -< .~
::;; &v"~=>80~ ~
.... -~~~~<;~~ <
~ ~~~p~~~qp~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~"":;s ~~:ffi8 @~
~ b~~~~~~~$~~~~s~~r-=&~~=~ UJ ~ w~ oU~t~ ~~
_ j~~~~~"l~~~~~~~"l~~~~~~~'" e ~ ~~ ~~~~8 ~z
'- '-"" ~-<3i;!i~~S!!:l!::;~~rlg~:;~;;t;:.2~c!ffi!;: rii ~ ;:1;u O~d~.... "';'"
o ~~ __......_____~_________N U 0 B~ S~Dw ~~
CI ~ uJ ;.:.1 W 7. .....l C ;1j ~ c:.,.,
. Z u 0 0 00 -<"I~f--< b-
Uz ~3~~~~~~q~~~~q~~~~q~~~~~~ ~
~~-~!!l--~-NOOQ~"OO~~vv"'~,,~-~ -
~ ~~@~(i~fA$f28~<-.l:2U'\~(i);S;S!;;V'i:'JV,~~;J; ~
_ ~ ..:~e~~~"-'d ~MM~~NOO~~~~~~~Sw ~
"'" i)i ~ z
~ b ~ ~ ~ .. g
:>: ::;;~8888888888888888888888 ~ >- ::;~::;q
., [;l ~ >- :'i ~ U U ~ ~ ~ U U ~ U U ~ U d ~ a ~ ~ ... :',l ~ ~ $
b~ ~ ~~gg8B~BS~g~ti~ggg~~ ti B ~ ~ Q a~52
~< __MNNNN..INM~NNN~NMNN ~ Z Z w" ~ O::>-~C
~ ~ 0 0 ~ ~<~~
z~ ..... C:::!:l: ~ 0 ~::L..""
~ ':.! <> ,,>- 0 0
~~o w~~ ~
~.....1 0_ ~ 00: fD (0
vi CI ~ ~ -0:: ~ "'). "'.
oJ z...._ S t: ~:1: ~
..J _ 1M ~;-t
:;: 0 -&'l- <
. ..J U ~
~;; .. :5
;a ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ tQ ~ gs gg ~ ~ ~ ~ gs ~ ~ 12 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 gs ~ 8 8 ~ 8' 8 8 8 ~ tQ i~1
< -< 0 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ <=i & ~ ~ <5 ~ ~ f;l .... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s:j :2 :j t d ~!i d c:i ~ d d ii :~:
~ ~::!:: ~ t: ~v_",--.:>."l.~_N. _~..,.._~_.o.qa___~. ,"'"_<'1."',0. 8_ _"l.8_ :z.8,I?',o:'1. 1'1
ou.... S 5 :::l88gg;8S88~~:s8~@~;::S88!;;: g fri:;;C e~s:: 18\
i:Z-"""- .... ......NNN_NNNNNNNN~NNNNMNa ......~"-' ",-VI 0
~ !;; "1'","': 1...1
;:l -< Vl VI 11111 ~
U ~ Cl.. 1 1 r:
~ffi~8gg~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~g~~ ~
~ bo~c:i~Eg~g~~~~~~~~~~~5~~~~ ~ ~ ~
u.l f--< I:l _. _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ . - . . - - . , ;...J !- V>
~ m ~~g~~~g~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ 8 0 ~
,.; .....:..J U ;.....
& F= ~ 12 ;':
&= ~888~~~~~"""~,,~~~"~"8~~ ~6 ~ ~ ~
~~ 8 ~o~~~3~~~E~~E~$~~g~~~ij* ~~~ ~ ffi ~
~5"-' ~ ~~~~~~Mta~M~~Mi~~~~M~ Oo:~~ u ~ z
5~ z _.....__=::::::__0'0' r-r- ......~""~-f'J_ ~OO '" Z b ;;
..... < _ :..~~ CUl 0 ~ Z
~ ~~~~~~~~$~~~#~~~##~ UlO~O ~~ ~ ~ <~
G ~~~ ~~~~~~~~~a~~~~~~tQ~r ~.~~~~~~~ 8 !;; Q~
. '-" UJu.l!< ..,..<t<t"'".......,.,Of'l.,.,V)-"O\D\D\C~I,D\D"'\O\D z:~<du.lp:::tJ::~~ Z Z '-.@J
~~ &:m~~~f--<oO".....l ...... 0 klw
...... ~~~OI::~?;O< ~ u ;:;:;;.-.
~ 88888888888888888888 ?~5U6~5g~ ~ ~ ~d
~ ..! _~ .............11..... ~~EI~SSB8~~ ~ @~
j~~ $ ~O ~~~~~g~~8~Sg~~~~~~~~ ~~8~~~~~~5~ ~ b~
.-l >- ~ --- C ~ - - - - - - - ...... ~ - - ;:1- ~ .... .. 8 E- :i ;:z ~ ~ ....:l := Z
'i.,....lO ex: ,..l<(m ;;::~---t;;..; -< ~
-< Q.., c...c.::tJ~-<!-<bf--<t:=........ ;:.. ~~
~Z~ ~<,....lOU~~~~~~ < ~~
.... -t <( < IJ.. '::;;;-
12~" ~M~~~~~~~-,,~~~~~~~s=~ ~<
..:00 ~g:g:~g::~~i!l>~~8~<:s1=S8<=S<-.l8~ooo w~
,~w ~ ~________MNNNNNMNNNMNo:'l ~o
5~~ '-' ~ :;::...
It 0 C ~
.
.., 8 \DOOIDo-.OONC'lOOOOON"1"Nl:'-OOOOr-.O ;~~~
-MONt"-OMV\l'--'D.....""D:lN\DOOIXlOOOO
~~ ..,f 06 ,...; r-: ...:",:; o..f 06 M ..0 ci"'; 0:.: c:i"'; ..0 c:i ...; I~ ;::1
~ ~F;;e:;:E;;f?:!;;e:;:1;;!;;~~e:;e:;e:;gggSg 1...-;>6! /'
I;;~ , ,
,,~ 1 1 IJ o c...:
A 1 , ~ ;>
. ~ ~ ;g~r;:;~~;;~~~;;~~,;:;1;gg:t;tg 1 1 '-...J ;>-":;:
Q " . g~;;:gggg;g&;g;;~~~~g;;8gC; 1 1 A ~
.., 8 N"'NNNNN('lNNNNN""....M...,....-.,..., 1 1 o y.
~ ~ Qt:3o$
-~ I.. 1
U J~ I ~[J')Si":t
::l~ 03~~~;:gg~~t!;;1;g~~~s:~~~~ ~~-~
J<!' ..I z~...j.(;\
'" :>'g ~~~~;~~~~~S~~~~~~~~ I" 1", ~~~~
:>'N IZ ~I
8 ~, 12 WI :..;, P ~ ,
..., .- '" -
i I:":> >1
18 ......) ;;
~ ! ,~ i' "
1" 1 "
fCl~~~M~~g::~~~;1;b~Sf;;8~1;; I~ wi 1,.:.;-
~ ~. "
S &3~&5~S;;~s3~~~s3~&i~ggc::gg J"-l ~I <
~ 51 1~ :.;:1 ~
~
~;;; "
0 :@ @: ~
~g q~~~~~0f4~~~~~;z;~t;:~= \1- 1-<( I.
~ MNMNMNN_NN,.,.,......'<:t'<1"V)V'\V)V) r~ ~I
.., ~ ..... t-................ t-t-- 1"-<-...............".... r-t'- .............. IE; ~I
~ "
~~ ;1;':: _I:J~
h ~~;:::;r:'~g8~~~'2g~~8~$g;~
~r;;~r;;~c;~r;;r;;r?:~~sj~S88S8 6 z C
;,: ~ 8 ~ 0 :..::
2;;; o t ~ '-'
"
~ e:...... ,...",
~ ~ .u w ~Q b" ~ l:f> I.-f' If' I.-/' t,Q ~" tf' l:f> I}' l:f> IJ' i:f' tf Ii' t f::; 852
. ..:: !- <fl g~t;~~~~~L;~~~~~~-~ "' -:::: /. I:J
~ ~"' 8 f- ;.-. c
0000 ooooooooo:g;g " N t.L. -r. 7.
:24 ~ oooooo6ciciddddc:idc:id "' tZl 00.........
~ ~ 2:i i" ~ ~ /" t:; 8
N ::; " ~ Q gt;..l
c ;>-< t w po;
..,"' "'" ~ u "'
~ ~ Il!> ~ N ~ ~ :r: 0 ~ :J
~~~~~~~~~g~~~~~~g~~~ :r
~ ~ e:l ~ co 51 ~ I- W ...... ~ J;
~~~ag~~~~~~g~~~~~~a~ " z ~ 2; t:: ~:3 "
Qh~ co ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ c: '"
~ ~ h ~o~d~~~~~~~o~o~~0M~~ " t
~!;!;:t~~~~~i7i~;;:;~Ir:~t:l:::JiJt;:::i:R::s.: :r " 0 z ct: ~ <
~~ ~ l.:l Z i=2 ::J 0 ~
N ~ ~ ~ i: ~ ~ ~ ~
~ A _ <
- Z w --::: j <-' <
w'" ~~8~8~8~i7i8~~~~~~i7i~~P8 ~ ~ <z :::;:....l ....::G 1; 0"
~ U '" ~
'" f' z Nrt~~~os2~~r;:i~~~~ti:g:;i~ct~~ " " 01" ~ 0 ffi ~ o. ~ ~
~ ~ ~ '" "' ~ -
~ ~q~ -~~~~~~~q~~~~~~~~ " '" - d z"' --11 :i :f
- a.. "".... oN ~ ''1 ,.., oN '" ~ C'-..... '" '" M"'i" r"l""" t'- 00 ~ ~ O::G ~ i:5 -
OO~"''''''''''''''''~''''''"'i""'i",..,~~''''''''''~M''''''OO_ ;;; ~ w f2
"- >0'" .........................---....._......_____('>('1<'>'" U "' ~<W~M ~ -
0 " "' u 5 Z .....! N U III '"
"' ~?, ~ ~ 0'0
. is u " " _ 0 ~ -
.., ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~g8ggggg~~~~g
z :3 3 u i-:-!
0 ~~~~!~~~~~gg~~~~~~~*g~ r-
'" I: ~ ffi <
"
" - <" 0 ~~OO~~.................,~N....~O~N~N....O~
Z ~ - oo~~~~~~~~~~ __NN~,..,,..,_
~ ~ z
i5 "' e ~ ~
-'
S I:i " 5:~rid
~~ ~ "'
'" 8888888888888888888888 ~ ~ ;l.w.....,...,
':88888888888888888 g 80 8 < u;g~:::
~:;I r- '" >0 ~ ~o~;:
-' qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq q ~ ~ ::i :i
00- ~ .....,.....,00.....,.....,00.....,0.....,0.....,0.....,0.....,.....,0 0 ~ ~ i2 C2;Gj,
r-t"-ooooooOOC\c\C'-OO__NNMM,..,-t ~ "'
gjtJ '" "" N '" ('l oN "" M N,.., ...... ...,,.., ,..,,.., ,..,,..,,..,,.., ,,; 0 0 ~ t t~~t;
Zz ~ ~ " 0 ~ ~ -
Z=>~ A~51 0
~:< ~ ~ '" ~
'"
~ Z 6 :;!UlQ; ~
~ 2 ~ S l::~~ g
-',...oof ~-~
-..~ ~
"'" 3
z_
w..J ..
"", ,... ~~ 8~88g88
'.l 0 ~ 8 ~~ ~~j!'.!~~~ ~~ 88888 8~~ ~~s:: 8 51 G I~I
o . d~~ ~!~~~~~g ~~~~ ~~~~ ~g ~ 8 ""....8gd~8 _ 0 1"';1
",:;I ~ !3~ 00 ~ r~1
0 8~""o8-to o ~
0'" is ~ ~~i~g~~~~g833t8g88g~~ ~ igici:i~~:i t~ rg:1
'" ., ~ "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" <"'l .... <"'l .... <"'l ,.., <"'l <"'l"" <"'l "" 00 - ~ ~ ~ ~ 10'>.1
~ i5 '.l I;; ,,; '" <; 1&:1
~ ~ 0
U" 0- 1 1 '"
,-, ~
~~~ ~
8888888888888888888888 ~
ci~~~~ ~~~~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~~~ 0-
~ag;; ~ ~ z:;
8 '" ~~~~~~~~~~~66~~~~ci~~o I;; ~
N ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~g~ GJ: 0 8 ~
~ >0 u
,,; u "
f' ~ 0 ~
i> ~ w '" " ~
~88888 88 88 88 888 88 88888 8 z ~ ~
~ci~~~~~~~~g~8g~g~g~~~~~ 0"' ~ ~ "
- ~ ~...... ~ IfJ " '"
~ S 8 oooo""""oooor--r--O\O'<tN'<t~ .......,""...."''''' .....g;oo 6 '" ~
~ ~~~~~G~i~~~g~~~~~~~~~ ~!;;;t:; ~ u =
~ [5 ~~~~..........-...............-.......... '<t ~. 0 IfJ Z 5 0
- N ~~u >offl 0 ~ z
... ~~"'8 03:~ ~ .,<i'
. ~ Q) ~~~~~~~~$~$~$~$~~~~ i ~~;:-f'"'~~~ 8 '" z 8
Q ~~~ 8~~~~8~g~g~~8g~~~gg w., :: ~ ~ 11: ~" ::l I;; Q -.i
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ z bll!>
. ~~~P:::I-<t;)up.,,~ ~ 0
Q)Q)ol.1l(l)Z~O.<f' ~ U " ~
~~~ti~~~~~g ~ " " ,.
88888888888888888888 f-< ~
I" .. 2 ~ A
:;! ~~~~g@~@~~~~g~g~~~~~ ;.-: ...-: 0 co.....l..., ;,..-, >r,
o ~ O~~I-LoIJ.lAOQQQ...J~ "' o ,
;:. .,;..J ~~ l=::)Q)~~~~l:!~l:!;::> ~ u ~
:3 ~ g:J e ;::;;0 &~8~~~g~~ggggg~ti~g~g '" ~ g
~ - ::.~ .....~....................___.....~N""NNNN..... ~I~ 8 " ., ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 7, :'i
...J .... ... '" ..... ..(...n 8 t: ~ "'" ..., -"...-: I-< .... :..r. "
53 ~ 0 ~ez:[fl~~~!;;~~~!:5ti " [fj ;;:;
~ 0-
CJ j ~ %~.....lOUfflI.LlUlUl~"'~ " ;;:: !-'-l
~ ~ d ~ ~
N .... "'T "" .." r-- 00 '" 00 ..... M M 8 "" \0 r-- "" '" <=> - ..... 'Il -::
~ 0 0 ~e: ~~ ~e:~e:~~~ ~~ N~ ~~~~~~~ ~ "
Iil ~ ~ s ~ 0
~ C$ ~ ~ ;3:1.l..
..,@ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I~-~i
I~ ~I
g~~ ~ ~:j;;;~o~~~~2:g~ag;S;gs:g::~o I-,D -.D1
;.. ~ ~~~~~~:::~~~~~:~::: 1 1
~ - 1 1 r;;;
,,~
Q 1 1
. 5 ~ 8. 18. !::~~~~\Dg~$~=~\D~[;;~g;:t,;::;8 1 1
1 1 '-../ o ~
-~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~8~~~~~ 1 1 ~ :;
~ ~ l.:i 1 ~~
~ I;" 1
'" @ ~ r.:;=S;r;~~~::f2S:~~:b~S;*S'f?2g8 1& E' 8" ~
f;~gw~ ~ ~ ~ 00 ~ ~ ~ ~ 00 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 00 ~ ~ d :z ~: ::2 ~ ~ ~
~~~~M~~~~NA~M~~M~~~ 12 WI ~ ~ :f ft,
0('1 ::> z r: M c-
U ~ ~ 15 :::1 -'l' ..... f',' 8
~
, IU h f3 6 ~ "?
Q ~ IS H::I ..., !- ..D _
;;;~~:ii3;:!f&l~~b~f2:::f;lcr::;t,G;'!~ 14' 21
~ @ u:;: l~ :.>.l,
Q:~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W'--
'D \D \D \D\D\D \D \D \DID \D '" ID'" \D \D\D\D \D 1> ::.JI ;~
~Viu 1< Zl
Ie:: 01
g @ ';i 0 ;::8:f~~~~t;~~~g;~~~~d;~~8 Ii= ~I
'" ;.. ~ 1< <I I
~3~ ;; ~~4~~~~~~'#~~~~~:1~~:,10 l:::i ~I ~~
If: f::1 w
< - "
> ~ 02_ ~~ ~
;..
!:! @ 0 S~:'?;:!;~~~:f:~~:-F:;t.!f~~~~g~8
~~ " ::t Z ~
2 ~ 8" ....; <:'i N N N M M ....: N N "'; ,-.; M oN N N ",i <'i ....; 0 ~
;;; r'l <"" ...., M ,....,...., ,.., .... <"1 <"l ,..., r<l ,...-, <"1 I'") ""!") <'1 M t 90::;:
.......""'Vi ~ o' ,...;
'" ~ ~ :: b
" :J1 0 z t3
x .... ~ \.lJ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~#~~~***~ =: :: ~ ~ ffi
-< r-' I- Vl ~~g~bS:;~8S;~g~~;;;~g;f;8;;;~~ f'
l- 0 ~ ~ "; ~t~~
- ~ ~ ~:;;ti;;:;~~~~:;;~;:1;V:;fri;1;~rrl;;;:;~'i" ell 0"- -
c ~ u o C"i C"i N C"i ('; o:'l ('i N <,i C"i N ('; ('i ('i N <'; N <,i 1'; 0 ~ P:: Z b C
< Z ~
U - " " - ~ 0 ~ l3
0 ~ @ >- E ffi 5 "'
...1 r @I <f. ~~~:;t~~VSgl-:8~~V)$~~o.r-88 N ~ ~ ~ c ;-- U oJ
:3 c: 1Il 8 _Mr-N&3r- s:Mo-.r-S3.....l-..of::t:1 - G ~ ~ bW:::::"'; J>
z U ~ ....: g=~#~~~~~~i~~~~~1~~~~ " I.t:U 3:i ~ ~ ;g ;:J
"'z<-' 0 <IllIl
~<t~;: _NMV<t'l l- O_N('fl t-.. O-NV ~ Q 0 {') b < s: :;:
=~~=====~~~tititi~ti~~~~~ ~ ZO 3:ij~o::
u ;.. <, z 0::....:10< ~
8 ~ S\ N"" ~ ~ 8 ~ ~
g,- ,.
<
"'''' - - '" ;:";.J N < ""
'" > u j7;~8rd8~~~~:J~8~~(6~~~~~~ - ~ _ z ~:::J ....: 0:: ~ ;.:.;'"
~ -" r:!o~~:.ti~aij~;g~Gi~V\l7ir::~~"":~o fJ ~ fj = '/) ,o:::Ul-.o :;:~
j:'i '" @~~t::&
U')!;; v 0-. -.0 <'I . l'- l.f'l t-.. M g <"l "'" "'......;J; a " el ~ - :;z
'" "- ~~~~~d0~~~~~"":~6~~~l~"": ;>. ~ ~ 6"~~O.
0 ;.,-.J ...; '" l'- "1 _ f-. V) l.f'l V"J or, '" l'- 0\ M'i" l'- '" ~, co.-( ~ 0:::"'" ..:Vi
~ " 1,/)--- __....._M <" '" I.=-l " E~
u ~ ~ ~, ....:I ('l U W
" ~ "' ~7. ....:Ie: L.I.l:r: ~-
. z u 0 Q Q 0 < M 0 f- f:::~
U ....:ICIl t:: ~~~~@@&~G~~~~~~~~~~~e~ ~
Z :< ==! u
." ~ ~ ffi ~E~~~~;~*~~E~~~~~~~~g~ 2
Z 8 z:::> Cl ~~g~~~;d~~roti=~~~~~~~~~
t;: < ~ ~ '"
/.
!i: ;:! .:! ~ Vi
u~ D
OJ @ ~~~j
" g 8888888888888888888888 "
OJ g~u~~~~~~~UU~~U~o@ ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~
." OJ ;.. '" 0 ~
E-< 0: s: ~ ~ ~ "' :.i
0" ~ gii'il~~~~~~~aa~sss~ i " 0 " g 5z~~
Z Z '" ~~~~
gj ." ::i 0 0 ~ t
pi " " 0
- ." g 0;" 0 0
" OJ ~ ~ ~ ~
0'
.J _ ....li-Uf;; f;;
ooo~ [5: ~~:& :;i
.J Z-
~-!"} ~-~
:Eo,," ""
.J U $
iii;5 ..
0'" E-< ~ '" 8;;;;8888 1;1
0: :l ~ 8~~~~~~~~:J~~~~~:J~~~~~8 8 Iii III
." '" 0 08 d~~~~~~~*~~~~~~~g~~g~~ @ ~~~o~~ ('i r..: :~:
~ ~ 8 :;;
'" -" €; ~~**~~~g~g~~~~~~~~~~~ v; a\"oriM '-'~ ~a !;--I
o ~ <: ~ " r:::.~""" '-' 181
i::zo: v; :;i 6 IMl
-"." ~ I~I
U " '" 1 I
~;.. '" 8 881ii Iii Iii Iii Iii Iii Iii <;\8 8 8 Iii Iii Iii Iii Iii 8 Iii 8 ~
-< ffi U >
5 0 ~ o~~~g~~~~~~~~~~~~E~~~~ S ~ "
lS ;.. "' ~8aa:;i~~~i~~~~~~~~~~~~ 8 ;.. '"
~ " ~ Z
....."1,.,MMMMNNMN M<'INM MoN'" " 0
v; U U
~ f' ~ "
~ "' " "
0' - ;.. 888 Iii Iii Iii Iii Iii Iii Iii Iii 8 8 8 Iii Iii Iii Iii Iii 8 Iii 8 r. ~ ~.
g, ~ sQ ~
- ;.. ~d~~~gN~S~~r..:~~g~~~~d~~~ "
...; :3 e _....M ~ M~'11t2"10o..0MI'IM\Dr-<'1 ......:z: ~ ci '"
;.. '" ~ ~~~~~$~~~~~i~8i~1~~~ti ~!z8 U '" ~
~ ~~ __....~....._......~~_____ l.f'l "" 0 U <I'J 7, b ~
~ ~ ...... ('1 Z
~ < u.. ~ _ {') u..: 0 "
~O"'B z!:d ~ <'"
. ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~##~~~@~~~~~ ~ ~~;:-~ul~~ .<!. " z8
I- i-U ~ ~gg~g~8......~~~$~~~~ ;.. Q-f
Q ~ ;.. of of .:f -i vi <ri vi vi vi ..0..0 I.C <D ..0 <D..o..o loCi ..0 "'<6i2~i::~", S ~
. i-U ~ ;;i :.<. t)@
~~~~a::I-"D.:; 6 8
'" :2"'O~~~o-r: r: ,,'"
~ 88888888888888888888 ~u..:t;~~~~@ ~ ~ c~
0 ir,Q
~ ZOO<::Cl ~~....:I ,.-'; ~
~ .., ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 64!
Cj ~~ Q!z~~~~~~O-l~ :'l
~, " vu..
~ :2 ~ @ ;::: 0 ~~~~~~gB~~~~gg~a~~~~ 5~8~~~~~~g~, " ~O
~ - ::;,2; :l i..:..l~
::2 ::J t3 " ,.; :3~cii p::~~6,..;:b5~ ~ Zo
'" ~ ~ ~~gj'-El<::""'I-<I-<I-<~ :> ~~
~ 7. ~ -t....lQu[::3gjf3[l<I'J::? " :;>:!J-l
@ "" -< ~ ' "'~
~ 0 "US\iR~8iU@888il8~81B~8s ~~
. 0 " 'n '"
.. ~ '" $ ~ ..... ..... _ ..... _ ...... .... _ N ..., M ('l "" oN N <"I M M M ('l 1'1 ;ii
~ .( t;; ;..
tr:: Q Q
RAMSEY COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY
~G\~a [lalfa ~~ 01l ~[P)G\ lf~
. July, 1992
Vol. 3, No.4
MAPLEWOOD
In the past month there have been some very visible changes to the exterior
of the new Maplewood Library. The roofing has been installed, as well as the blue
metal trim along the roof line. The exterior masonry is complete, and framing forthe
many windows is being placed. The building will be closed in within the next several
weeks. The retaining wall to the south of the buiiding is under construction and
should be completed within the month. When all of the masonry equipment has
been moved off the site, fill will be brought in for the construction of the parking lot.
The interior of the building is also undergoing changes. The drywall framing
is being installed, ductwork is being hung and the electrical system is taking shape,
Completion of the building should be in late summer.
The model and blueprints of the new library can be viewed on the upper level
~ of Maplewood Mall near Sears in one of the storefronts, The display was made
possible by Jeff Carver, Marketing Director of Maplewood Mall.
--Alice-Jo Carlson
ROSEVILLE
The site is a beehive of activity-houses being moved, a pool being exca-
vated, trucks and construction equipment everywhere!
One of the three homes has been moved and the other two homes will
be moved after the 4th of July holiday. The pool has been excavated and the
resulting hole has been filled in. The wells on the site have been capped, and
the site should be totally cleaned up by the end of the first week in July.
Bids for the construction of the new Roseville Library will be received in
August. and construction will begin almost immediately to take advantage of
the weather.
--Alice-Jo Carlson
.
~ /- u~u..~
- /uesday) 7/0'7/9~
· !~~~Ii'i~ &:~i~:
; the al)tecr~";;;, ' courage "the Eagles'or Eik's to.
, ,"i,';;:;';' cOme in and blowout of townJOf.
Arden Hills , th~~e~~=p~,cili:ei;::l~2~~~'~f
, has become a large dqilato~ to'the ,.' ,
, may soften' .. Mounds View SChO()l.District,.'
gambling - GAMBLINGlPage~.
;" license rilles
SHELBY NICOLAUS-DUNSKI
, In'light of recently 'added state.
taxes to charitable gambling
groups. Arden Hills leaders may
ease up on their regulations. '. .
The City Council delayed its G . 'ti...., .
decision on a proposal to, among am lng
, other thmgs, reduce the amount it,. .
- required organizations to spend in From page I The proposal also creates a stan-
the the city's trade area from 50 to dardized reporting format for
30 percent last week. Sather said. licensed organizations which
,. The "council'should consider But the city approved its o~di- would also include trade,area
,. reducing the trade-area spending. . nance pnor to the state addmg spending information.
, requirement to;.rec'ognize the I more .tax~s to, charitable gambling, Arden Hills leaders first grap-
impact of the ~ta!e tax burdeII to ' organIZations plates.. pled with the trade-area spending
i the organizations,"Citx Accoun- f The council plans. to diSCUSS tile r<:<Iu!"ement prior to approving the
1'......... tan. tT. e rry. .p.o.s.t..w. .~o. .te 10.' am..e.m .0. . I.......p..rop. ..osal.at.aJu1Y...;,..2......0 w.o..r..k........s. .e...s-.. Clty.S. :hantable g:lIflbhng ord.-
i~. to thecOlmcil:' ".~IOn.. ,. .", ,'-.". nance 10 1990. It went into effect
If... . Charitable g~bli!lg organiza-_":O Another recommeIldati~n i~ the '.' last year. . .
I'f"'~' uons nOrm.ally use abo.ut75 per- .Propo~al man?a\es..1P91l~rcent:,The council agreed to .the ordl-
I 'c,yent of the If gross receipts to pay ~.,.9()mpllan.ce.\V~th ,tbep~e~ept)O;, IllUI9~because, at that-tlme, fonr
I.' prizes,Pos(said,Of the reDlain' .percentneLPIofI! cQIItrlbution- ~fthe'nine charitable gambling
I. mg, the'gros~profit; 50 percent is req~ue.JJ;lentre~oactIve to' thellce'nse-hold:~s were from out of
" used for salaries and overhead, . begmnmg of thiS year. And, to . town: Council members agreed
; . and 20 per~nt pays state taxes, .he regulate the 10 percent net profit. tbe ordinance would force license-
,. said. . . . . contribution, the city will consid- . holders to makc contributions to
Organizations are generally left er imposing a I percent gambling, the area.
with about 30 percent of their tax,
I gross profits, he said. AJ;1d Arden
Hills' ordinance requires charita-
. ble gambling organizations spend
50 percent of their gross profits in
the trade area.
The result is a disincentive for
organizations to operate in the
area, Post said,
i "I'm trying to look at it from the
I organizations' standpoint andwhat
: is doable,"be said.
,. i "What we run into here'is a
,. /' numbers problem," said Council
'Member Paul Malone.
But Mayor Tholria$.Sather said
.. he. is unco~fortable with the trade
. area reduction. C!C,: Y?ff!...b. t-
7/1011.2-
/'--- Foc,L( S
lUesdatj 7/01/9;'
.
Residents spout off againsf,payil1g \
for Arden Place storD1sewe~llroJe.ctl\
SHELBY NICOLAUs-DUNSKI system - one to run lhe pIpe a1o~g lhe north ngbt.-of-!
way of Arden Place, across Ridgewood Road mto'
Arden Hills residents spouted 'off last week aboul property owned by the Lake JobannaBeacb Club arid
wbo will pay for a revamped storm sewer in their 'another 10 replace tile pipe lhat extends from behind
neighborbood. '. .', . 1533 Arden Place soutb across Arden Place to ,
Tbougb the purpose of last week's public hearing between 1540 ,mil 1548 Arden Place:' H , .' I
was.to discuss two options of where to locate the Tbe options are estimate4 to cost $30,009 and
storm'sewer, neighbors were more concerned with $20,800, respectively. ': .'. ," ," I
wbo will ultimately pay for it. City leaders will continue.disc~ssing the Issue at a I
'''There's no way lnthe worl4,anyone can convince July 20 work sesSion and will feConvene'lbe public. I
me.our bousewillin crease in, the, lhousands of dOl.-,.'bearing July 27.,."
landn market value for something I see as a prob\'iffi ;: At, that time, City AUOfJ1ey. Jerome FiJJa is expected I,
between theciti' andtwo, bomes affected by pOoflo present information 01; howmucb it would cost the',
drainage, said Debra Thornton, 3510 Siems Court.>' ',city toac'quire,an eas~~ent bjitween thebomes's'
The projeCt will correct drainage problems that left involved 'arid anotherlby 'the Lake Jobanna Beacb'"
sumding water on two properties in the Arden I'1l!re (::Iub. "., 'T ....,., ".,,' "', , . ,.' ,,'" '. '1
area. . .' F!t'.'di11g ,llIe 11[i?jectis ex~ted to be discu~sed dur-
Arden Hi.!ls leaders have two options 10 bUIld the ing}l. futUre as~smehtpeanng. "
".~ '~~::.t, -'~ :<~ . . >- _i.
. , --.'."
~ ----
~
c!.(!; ~ckL:t-
7)0 1'1~
/VeuJ /JO,ghiOf) /XL/IUlf
Who pays ? Wed, - 1/g/9Z
~ Drainage plan tabled
The. solution to the drainage prohlem
along Arden Place was postponed again last
week as the' Arden Hills City Council tabled
action and continued a public hearing to its
July 27 meeting.
The .cost of installing a new, larger
drainage pipe. is estimated to cost $20,800,
including administrative costs. However, the
city is 'uncertain if, a drainage easement must
be acquired as well, and if so, at what cost.
The council hopes to have an answer by
July 27 concerning easement costs. At least a:
portion of the project likely will be assessed
to local property owners, many. ,of whom
. voiced strong opposition to that idea at the
June. 29 public hearing.
Some property owners stated the project
will not add value to their respective
properties; therefore they should not be
assessed. However, the city's consulting
engineer said all owners of properties that
contribute water runoff to the drainage
problem could be assessed.
One home in the area receives most of the
unwanted excess drainage. Some surrounding
property owners said the city should not have
~ allowed the home to be built in the first
place, Therefore, they contend the city should
pay the entire cost of solving the problem.
..
Search party ;
AH hires headhunter
The Arden Hills City Council has agreed
to pay a consulting firm up to $4,500 to assist
the city in searching' for a new City
Administrator.
.Former administrator Gary Berger
resigned March 23.
The Brimeyer Group has estimated it will
,. talCe ,40.-to 45"'honrS"W'perfcifui,'ltS''f'tiQ.\1Ji6riZ'' .'
which includes II).eeting with current city
staff, determining community priorities,
. screening interested individuals, developing a
list of five to seven c~ndidates and
conducting background a"d reference checks
on those the city council wishes to interview.
~ The firm' will charge $110 per hour for its
work.
The new city administrator can expect to
earn an annual salary of between $45,000 and
$50,000.
. Cc..-: Pa{!ket
7/ lo/~z.
fVeAJ.J Or{JrJfUfJ KJUlfOT/fj
Wed - 7/0/1Z
- -
. Tough negotiator .,~,....,-..,."... '
Arden Hills man calls foul; says city 'destroyed' his driveway
/>y Mark Engebretson accusing the city's consulting confrontation with.. Podlasek.>
, Wbo says you can't fight city engineer of shortchanging bim on Nevertheless, Graham could not
ball? the quality of that project. hide his frustration over the matter,
. Though he basn't won anything But before adjourning for the
yet, longtime , Arden Hills resident POD LASEK CLAIMS the evening, the council directed
Francis Podlasek is finding gruff engineer lowered the elevation of Graham to get an estimate for the
talk and persistent lobbying can the road in front of his house by up job of regrading the entire length of
sometimes make a difference with to two feet, making for a steep Podlasek's dIiveway, about 98 feet. I
,
city council members. incline from the street up his
Last year Podlasek, and others, driveway. Podlasek said the dirt GRAHAM HAS maintained
almost convinced the city council from the two'foot cut was used as that the elevation was lowered only
to withdraw its proposal to fill in other areas of the 'Project and six inches and was necessary to
reconstruct the road in front of his was done to lower overall project provide a uniform street grade and
house. In fact, the council pulled its costs. to match topography on both sides
plans for the North Snelling The issue was discussed at the of the road.
Avenue project, but later reversed June 29 city council meeting, and "That's a lie Mark," Podlasek
itself. Podlasek and Qthers on the during the meeting Podlasek got said after Graham 'restatedthat at
street paid a pretty penny when it hot, as he accused the engineer of the meeting.
came time to fnnd their portion of lying. Mark Graham, the. engineer,
the project - about $3,500 each. defended himself to the council, Driveway,.. .
Now Podlasek is back and he's while carefully avoiding a direct continued on page 9A
~ ,1\
-.. .....lDrivewayICity may regrade-
. continued from page 3A making the driveway level, as it
. Graham said despite his was before the road reconstruction. .
disagreement with Podlasek, he He estimated the dirt moving to .
proposed last fall to regrade the cost between $2,000 and $3,000.
fltst 40 feet of Podlasek'sdriveway Podlasek said he will pay,for the .
anyway. Podlasek agreed, but later concrete and any additional base
I refused, Graham says. i needed. '
. "W~'ve tried.t? effectively work "I'~ n~t,trying to rob anybody,"
With him ~nd It s com.e to this," . h~ ~~Id. I m only trying to be
Graham SaId at the meeting, t farr. .
"Why does this man have the ...i I
right to destroy my driveway,"': A~ER A BRIEF discussion I
countered Podlasek, who came In which some council members
arm~d with before and after photos symp.athized with the problems
of hIS driveway. associated with a steep driveway
. ". Council Member ,D~le Hick~
. PODLASEK SAYS he changed ?Joved. to direct Graham to get the
hiS mmd for. two reasons: one, he Job es~e. The council approved
wants to IDstall a concrete the. motion 4-0. Council Member
driveway instead of bituminous; Tom Mahowald wasabsenl.,
and two,.he wants the entire length _-, __:rhe issue likely will be back at
of the driveway to be level. "Why th~ J~I~ 13 meeting, when the'
do I have to accept less than what I .' council likely will vote ou whether
~ had?" ~e aske~ rhetorically about to pay for the regrading.
the mchne, saymg he didn't want a
"twoopitched driveway."
, Podlasek said he only wants the
city to pay for "moving dirt" and
CC" Packer
7//0/Q,Z