The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCCP 09-14-1992 ** REV I SED ** AGENDA . ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEETING ~ COUNCIL CHAMBERS /'// MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 1992,7:30 P.M. 1- CALL TO ORDERIROLL CALL 7:30 P.M. 2, AGENDA ADOPTION 3. APPROVAL OF AUGUST 31 COUNCIL MINUTES 4. CONSENT CALENDAR a. Authorize Expenditure of Appraisals for Harstad, City Hall, and Arden Place Sites. b. Adopt Res. No. 92-62 Premises Permit for Class B Pull Tabs - Lions Club. c. Adopt Res. No. 92-63 Approving the Bingo Hall License Application. d. Adopt Res. No. 92-64 Clarifying Proposed Sums of Money to be Levied for Levy Year 1992 Payable in 1993. e. Adopt Proclamation Declaring September 27 as U.S. Army Reserve Day. f. Receive and Accept the Proposal to Inspect the Water Tower on Femwood Avenue. g. Approve List of ClaimslPayrolI. .- =- 5. PUBLIC COMMENTS 6. UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS A. Discussion of Proposed Revision of Administrator Job Description. (Available Monday - Attorney Filla). B. Case No. 92-16; Site Plan Review, 1160 West County Road E (Old Hoigaard Building), Joe Commers. C. Authorization to Extend 90-Day Leave for Public Works Employee. D. Discussion of Bond Referendum. 7. COUNCIL COMMENTS 8. ADJOURN SEPTEMBER MEETINGS OCTOBER MEETINGS September 8-Worksession, 4:00 pm October 7 - Planning Comm, 7:30 pm September 14-Council Mtg, 7:30 pm October 12- COLUMBUS DAY - HOLIDAY September IS-State Primary Election October 13- Council Mtg, 7:30 pm September 17-Public Sfty/Wks 7:30 pm October 15- Public Saf!Wks, 7:30 pm September 22-Park & Rec Comm 7:30 pm October 22- Finance Comm, 7:30 pm . September 24-Finance Comm, 7:30 pm October 26- Council Mtg, 7:30 pm. September 28-Council Mtg, 7:30 pm October 27- Park & Rec Comm, 7:30 pm - - - - - - - - ~ - ~ - ~ - - - - - --- - - . - ... ... ...-..- .. - - ...- - - . - .! --....- . - ~ ~/Jjj- ~~. . y~ tJ C?--..) !j JW;~ .9) c; v ~ ~ ~0;" ~..tl' ~ ~~ ~ 0 ~(~,,"j '-'. ~,-',-'~.--',. ,",--,~~"_.,,..~""",'" ~_."-''---- . t,,;r. & " ~4- ~ cf fz-k -~ (s--o) toB ~ - --- 6~ ~k ~q:;:- -~@ ~ lxraa~.J7~- '/~to ~-o . - ~ ~ 7.'3~ . ~/If~oznt?- ~-~ -~ . @ Ucfb Md- ~-~~~~~~~~-=- -- ~<-~.- - ~- . ~-O ~ . - ~ AGENDA ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEETING . COUNCIL CHAMBERS MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 1992, 7:30 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDERIROLL CALL 7:30 P.M. 2. AGENDA ADOPTION 3. APPROVAL OF AUGUST 31 COUNCIL MINUTES 4. CONSENT CALENDAR a. Authorize Expenditure of Appraisals for Harstad, City Hall, and Arden Place Sites. b. Adopt Res. No. 92-62 Premises Permit for Class B Pull Tabs - Lions Club. c. Adopt Res. No. 92-63 Approving the Bingo Hall License Application. d. Adopt Res. No. 92-64 Clarifying Proposed Sums of Money to be Levied for Levy Year 1992 Payable in 1993. e. Adopt Proclamation Declaring September 27 as U.S. Army Reserve Day. f. Receive and Accept the Proposal to Inspect the Water Tower on Fernwood Avenue. g. Approve List of ClaimslPayrolI. . 5. PUBLIC COMMENTS 6. UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS A. Discussion of Proposed Revision of Administrator Job Description. (Available Monday - Attorney Filla). B. Case No. 92-16; Site Plan Review, 1160 West County Road E (Old Hoigaard Building), Joe Commers. C. Authorization to Extend 90-Day Leave for Public Works Employee. 8. COUNCIL COMMENTS 9. ADJOURN SEPTEMBER MEETINGS OcrOBER MEETINGS September 8-Worksession, 4:00 pm October 7 - Planning Comm, 7:30 pm September 14-Council Mtg, 7:30 pm October 12- COLUMBUS DAY - HOLIDAY September 15-State Primary Election October 13- Council Mtg, 7:30 pm September 17-Public Sfty/Wks 7:30 pm October 15- Public Saf/Wks, 7:30 pm September 22-Park & Rec Comm 7:30 pm October 22- Finance Comm, 7:30 pm September 24-Finance Comm, 7:30 pm October 26- Council Mtg, 7:30 pm . September 28-Council Mtg, 7:30 pID October 27- Park & Rec Comm, 7:30 pm - 1 . MINUTES CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING August 31, 1992 7:30 P.M. - City Hall CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Note that Council met at 4:00 p.m. for a budget worksession, and at 6:30 p.m. (in closed session) to conduct a performance evaluation. Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Sather called to order the regular City Council meeting at 7:30 p.m. Present: Mayor Thomas Sather; Councilmembers JoAnn Growe, Dale Hicks, Thomas Mahowald, Paul Malone. Also present were: City Attorney, Jerry Fill a; City Engineer, Mark Graham; Public Works Superintendent, Dan Winkel; City Accountant, Terry Post; Acting Clerk Administrator, Ca therine Iago; Recording Secretary, Foster. . ADOPT AGENDA Council was notified that two items should be deleted from the agenda, those being It em 5 "Discussion with Architect" and Item 10D "Authorization to Extend Public Works Employee Term of Employment". Council agreed to these deletions. Council was notified that two items should be added to the agenda, those being Item lOG "Request from Zeos for Tent Sales" and 10H "Management Financial Summary from Finance Committee". Council agreed to these additions. City Attorney Filla requested a short closed meeting immediately after the regular agenda to discuss status of litigation involving the City. Council agreed to conduct that closed meeting. MOTION: Mahowald moved, seconded by Growe, to adopt the August 31, 1992 agenda including the above-noted deletions (2 ), additions (2 ) and closed litigation meeting. Motion carried unanimously (5-0). DISCUSSION WITH ARCHITECT This agenda item was deleted under adoption of agenda. I.;: . APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MINUTES .. , f Councilmember Malone asked that the third paragraph of page , seven of the August 17, 1992 meeting minutes be revised to l 'read: "Norris Strawbridge . specific points along the f .Ii ~ .. .'." Arden Hills Council 2 August 31, 1992 . roofline of the proposed building requiring a variance to 75' height. " Council agreed to this revision. MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Hicks, to approve the minutes of August 17, 1992 Regular Counci 1 Meeting with the above-noted revision to page seven. Motion carried unanimously (5-0) . CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember Mahowald and Growe agreed to approve item "a" under Consent Calendar, but expressed interest in further discussing the item under "Council Comments". MOT ION : Hicks moved, seconded by Malone to approve the Consent calendar and authorize execution of all necessary documents contained therein. Motion carried unanimously (5-0). a. Accept resignation from Jerry Miller, Chair, Public Safety/Works Committee. b. Appointment of Additional Election Judge for the 1992 State Primary Election, c. Approval Final Pay Estimate #5 for 1991 North . Snelling Avenue Improvements. d. Approve Release of Collateral Held on City's Behalf from Norwest Bank. e. Approve List of Claims/Payroll. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. PUBLIC HEARINGS KEITHSON POND ASSESSMENTS (continued from July 20 & ,June 29, 1992) Mayor Sather opened the meeting at 7:40 p.m. for the purpose of continuing a public hearing (from July 20 and June 29, 1992) on Keithson Pond Assessments. Acting Clerk Administrator Iago verified remailing of notices to affected property o'wners on July 30, 1992. Reviewing background, City Engineer Graham recalled that estimated assessments ror the proposed Keithson Pond project were presented at the June 29 and July 20 assessment hearings, where affected residents were given the opportunity to register their objections. Graham added that on July 20, Council: . 1) Based on the opinion of the City appraiser, established a maximum supportable per lot assessment of $1,500; and 2 ) Based on the opinion of the City Engineer after review of the topography of the areal determined which .~ . Arden Hills Council 3 August 31, 1992 affected lots should be assessed 100%, 50% or 25% of the maximum supportable per lot assessment. Graham reported that assuming this project were awarded to the lowest bidder, the total cost of the project, including construction and 30% overhead (administration, legal, etc.) would be $42,558. Assuming assessment rates established by Council on July 20, $11,625 would be assessed to affected property owners and the remainder would be paid by the City at large. Graham stated that a summary of the events surrounding Keithson Pond and responses to all registered objections were compiled within one document dated July 27, 1992 and forwarded to affected partiea along with their notice of this meeting. Members of the audience reported they had not received the Summary and Response document Graham referred to. Acting Clerk Administrator Iago commented that she had directed staff to attach the Summary and Response document to the . meeting notices, and apparently the document was not included in the mailing, Staff provided copies to all members of the audience. Mayor Sather reminded the public that this evening's meeting will be limited to discussion of previously registered objections. Kurt Lawrence, 4516 Keithson Drive, asked why Council has lied to owners about this project, why no other owners are being assessed when other properties contribute to the drainage, and if the City will be able to answer those questions in court. Ron Nelson. 4504 Keithson Drive, stated that a letter from residents on his block was sent to the City over 30 days ago. Residents showed an acknowledgment of the City's receipt of their letter on July 15, 1992. Nelson asked why the Summary and Response document was just received this evening. Dick Foster, 4527 Keithson Drive; Teresa Giel, 4534 Keithson Drive; and Jean Crimmins, 4509 Keithson Drive; echoed Ron Nelson's comments. In light of residents not receiving copies of the Summary . and Response document prior to this meeting, Mayor Sather suggested a recess in order to give residents the opportunity to review the document. Mark Magers. 4521 Keithson Drive. asked to reschedule this public hearing to provide residents more time to adequately review the material. Arden Hi 11 s Council 4 August 31, 1992 . Jean Crimmins asked when construction would begin. Graham stated that the contractor had ini tiall y indicated the work would begin right after Labor Day, but that schedule has now been postponed for a couple of weeks. Attorney Filla commented that the purpose of tonight's meeting is to allow an exchange regarding previously registered objections and responses, and he assured that Council is aware and has considered all the previously heard comments on this lssue, He stated that he would be comfortable conducting the public hearing tonight, but if Counci 1 so desired, the meeting could be rescheduled to a specific date. Mayor Sather stated he would be amenable to postponing if residents desire. Councilmember Mahowald reminded that those in attendance this evening already know everyone's positions on this issue, and the issue has already been delayed. Councilmember Malone echoed Mahowald's comments and reiterated the fact that addi ti ona 1 objections will not be introduced this evening. Councilmember Growe stated she would accept postponing or moving the item to the end of this evening's agenda to allow residents adequate time to review the Summary and Response document, councilmember . Hicks stated that Council has been trying to resolve issues involving Keithson Pond for a very long time, and he does not appreciate innuendo that Council has lied to the public on this matter; he agreed to postpone if residents so desire after review of the material. Councilmember Mahowald concurred with Hicks and stated that Council has tried at length to resolve the Keithson Pond issue and is not likely to be receptive to negative comments made against council's intentions in this matter. Council agreed to recess for 15 minutes, then let the residents decide whether to postpone the hearing. The meeting recessed. Mayor Sather reconvened the public hearing at 8:15 p,m. and reminded residents that discussion would be limited to the previously registered object.ions and their responses. Attorney Filla asked to focus on each objection case by case as outlined in the July 27 Summary and Response document. Nelson Obiection - 4 'S_Q4 nh'"j tb.s 0.1'1--'. Ron Nelson complimented staff for their summary of Keithson Pond background. He asked if the estimated project costs reported this evening by Graham inel ude easement acquisition on the Reiling property. Attot'ney Filla reported that the Reiling property . needed for the pond is currently involved in condemnation; the project costs reported this everllng do not incl ude any Reiling property acquisition costs. Graham added that the J@ . Arden Hills Council 5 August 31, 1992 total project costs of approximately $45,500 given this evening include approximately $34,000 for construction and 30% for overhead (administration, legal, etc. ) . Ron Nelson contended that his property is not benefitted in that it will not become more valuable as a result of the proposed Keithson Pond project. He stated he has not received answers to his satisfaction, that he was told when purchasing his home that the pond would be developed and therefore assumed the cost to develop an adequate pond was included in the cost of his home. He asked why the City released the developer's performance bond and why the nearby townhomes are not being assessed since some of their drainage contributes to Keithson Pond. Attorney Filla reiterated that Council 1) Established a maximum per lot assessment of $1,500 based upon the City appraiser's information that $1,500 was supportable; and 2) Determined what percentage each lot contributes drainage to Keithson Pond, based on the City Engineer's analysis of topography. . Ron Nelson stated that his basis for argument is that the pond existed when he purchased his home and he assumed it was adequate. He added that when he moved in to the home, the street was straight, but in time, the grade of the street changed to such a degree that a catch basin had to be relocated. Regarding the townhomes, Graham explained the townhomes have their own large pond which collects drainage from the townhomes. He added that he did review the topography and found townhome property run-off is collected in its own pond. Regarding assumptions made by residents when purchasing their homes, Filla stated that typically a home purchase includes a "package" of improvements, but there are other types of improvements which can affect property. He reiterated that the City appraiser has opined that a maximum $1,500 assessment per lot is supportable for Keithson Pond improvements in that affected properties would receive that amount of ~conomic benefit from the project. He reminded residents that an off-site drainage management system does benefit a property in that the property need not collect all its own run-off on site. t }1 . Attorney added that if this matter goes to court, he is "~ iI comfortable that appraisal information is correct within 5 - :.1 ," 10%. He reminded those residents who may potentially be !it assessed that the City at large is paying the lion's share I of the project. He stated that from a legal standpoint, I Arden Hills Council 6 August 31. 1992 . storm sewer improvements are difficult to handle in court. Regarding the release of performance bond, Filla explained that typically the City has a list of items which must be accomplished to the satisfaction of the City Engineer before a performance bond can be released, In the case of Keithson Pond, that list did not , specifically include drainage and grading. At the completion of the development, the engineer recommended releasing the performance bond on the basis that the items on the list were satisfactorily accomplished. Graham stated that un ti 1 this evening he was not aware that there had been any changes in street grade. Rocheleau Obiection - 4503 Keithson: Rainer Rocheleau, 4503 Keithson Drive, commented that he does not believe this project wi 11 benefit his property, Attorney Filla replied that the City Council has determined that the Rocheleau property should be assessed at 100% of the maximum supportable lot assessment of $1,500. Crim~ins Obiection - 4509 Keithson: Jean Crimrnins commented that when the inlet was installed, her property was altered and damaged by negligent lack of action by the . city. She added that the City also is negligent in allowing so much time to pass before responding to residents' concerns. Attorney Filla replied that the City has been working toward resolution for some time; . with regard to pursuing the developer, Council has taken the position that to do so would likely only add legal costs to the project with little chance of recovering any of the costs. Attorney Filla noted that Crimmins' had previously registered an objection on the basis that they understood there was money allocated to pay for this improvement. He stated that there has not been money allocated for this improvement and to Lis }::nowl pdq!';': the City has not gIven such information to residents. He added that even In situations where money has been allocated for an improvement project, the City is allowed to assess as long as there is supportable benefit to residents. Jean crimmins commented that Rice Creek Watershed District and the former City engineering consultant should be held responsible for apprQving the inadequate drainage and releasing bonds. She added that she does not consider the Keithson Fond project an "improvement" project. Attorney Filla reiterated that drainage/grading plans were . not on the original list of accomplishments required prior to the release of performance bond. He further stated that all required improvement were completed to the City --.--.. --- ~ . Arden Hills Council 7 August 31, 1992 Engineer's satisfaction and he recommended releasing the bond, which the City did. Jean Crimmins summarized her objection that the City and Rice Creek Watershed District was negligent by releasing the bond and approving an unacceptable drainage plan, they were further negligent by not addressing the issue in a timely fashion, and further negligent by allowing the Crimmins property to erode. she added that some of the townhome property drains through the Nelson and Horwath parcels and therefore should be assessed. Horwath Obiection - 4510 Keithson: Filla referred to the Horwath's objection outlined in the July 27 Summary and Response document, wherein the Horwaths contend they paid a share of development cost with the purchase of their property and their property does not abut the pond improvement and therefore will not benefit. Filla explained that water run-off from the Horwath property eventually runs to Keithson Pond, so there is a benefit. He . added that from the very beginning, it was understood by the City that the existing pond was not designed or intended to be a complete drainage system; the design clearly showed there would be a need for a downstream drainage system sometime in the future. Nancy Horwath asked how many times residents would have to pay; what would happen if Keithson Pond, after improved is still inadequate. or if the Reiling property is developed. Graham explained that if the Reiling property were developed, the developer would be required to adequately address drainage. Filla added that per the City assessment policy, .a property can only be assessed once for any given assessment, but special assessments can be levied up to the amount of benef it. He said if it can be proven that a property has received benefit, the City has the right to assess. Lawrence Obiection - 4516 Keithson: Kurt Lawrence contended that the proposed assessments are illegal because the properties involved are not receiving benefit and certain properties (such as the townhomes and the Reiling property) are not proposed to be assessed. Filla stated that in order to assess, the City must prove equitable assessment to similarly situated properties; in his opinion . that has been done. Kurt Lawrence commented that the Keithson Pond project is not an "improvement" project but rather something being done , ,oi , to protect the ~ity from liability, so other funding sources u It ~hould be sought. Filla replied that this project is not 0\1,- jJ. " li; fi I. ---- Arden Hills Council 8 August 31, 1992 . being done to side step any liability issue, but rather this project was always intended. Regarding the issue of funding the project, Filla reminded that the City at large will pay the majority of the project and there are no other known means. Fi 11 a added that if the City did pursue the developer, anything recovered could theoretically be applied to the City's portion rather than decrease individual assessments. Kurt [,awr enc e said the developer, at one time, planned to 1mprove the pond, but the City said it was not needed. Graham stated that not having been involved at that time, he does not know what actually took place, Fill a stated that the City has never said this pond or the pond outlet was not needed. Councilmember Hicks added that in conversing with the former City engineer, they also have no recollection of discouraging the developer from improving the pond. Dick Foster explained there was once a pipe from the street to the old pond which was removed. Maqers/Tredal Obiection - 4521 Keithson: Mark Magers stated that in 1989. he called the former engineer and Mayor Sather to review the concerns of the Keithson properties; several meetings took placel but the developer had no plan to . address the problems then; now the developer is no longer involved and more time has elapsed. He said that when the City Engineer released the bond, the drainage issue was not resolved. Fi 11 a commented that an outlet to the Reiling property was always intended and now the City is taking action to obtain the easement for the outl et through condemnation proceedings. Fill a added that Rice Creek Watershed District approved the drainage plans assum1ng an outlet would be added sometime in the future. Toni Tredal said she has a copy of the Rice Creek Watershed District permit spelling out the conditions the developer was required to meet} ~ut the developer did not cOlTlplet.e any of the conditions. she stated that she 1S offended by Councilmember Hicks earlier comments becallse Magers/Tredal have spent. very much time trying to deal with this matter. !ind~XE; on On ~ei:t :LO;l - 4522 Keithson: James Anderson asked t..Jf.lY the Rei ~ ; ng propert.y 1S not proposed to be assessed. Graham state;:: that the Reiling property is adequate to hold its C";.-lfj dra:"::1age! part _ c the pond is located on the Reiling \-'.!.. property, and Mr. Reiling has not. granted an easement or donated his i.'roperty to contain drainage ft'om other properties Foster Obiection - 4527 Keithson: Dick Foster commented . that the Reiling property drains more into the pond than any other property in the area. He questioned whether the City ~ . Arden Hills Council 9 August 31, 1992 is bargaining with Mr. Reiling. Filla stated that so far there has been no negotiation with Mr, Reiling to make a trade of assessment for property or any similar agreements. Filla stated that it is the City's hope that the layout of the pond will benefi t the Reiling property to a degree that Mr. Reiling may cooperate and the City can reduce its exposure to compensate Reiling for intrusion on his property. Filla added that if the Reiling property were to be assessed, assessment hearings would need to be reconducted. Filla referred to Dick Foster's objection in the Summary and Response document that if the Reiling property had been developed at the same time as the Keithson development, the cost of this improvement would be less. Filla commented that this may be true, but Mr. Reiling did not wish to develop his property at that time. Dick Foster commented that if the City had taken action a few years ago by digging the existing pond deeper, problems could have been corrected then. Filla reiterated that Mr. . Reiling has never agreed to grant an easement to allow the City to do so; if he had, the City would have taken action earlier. Fill a added, however, that assessments would have been supportable in that scenario. Hill Obiection - 4528 Keithson: Regarding Hills objection on the premise that this project benefits the entire community, Filla stated he agreed and that is why the City at 1 arge will be absorbing such a large share of the costs. He added that certain properties, those proposed to be specially assessed, receive additional benefit. Giel Obiection - 4534 Keithson: Teresa Giel stated her comments have already been answered this evening, but she was offended by some Council comments earlier this evening. Lawyer Obiection - 4539 Keithson: Filla stated this objection has already been covered this evening. Stennes Obiection - 4540 Keithson: Filla referred to Stennes' objection that the majority of the Stennes property does not drain into the pond and therefore does not receive benefit . Filla explained that Council determined that 25% of the Stennes property drains to Keithson Pond, therefore the owner would be assessed 25% of the maximum supportable . per lot assessment. Attorney Filla recommended that the July 27, 1992 Summary . and Response document and the videotape recording of this evening's meeting be preserved for at least 90 days. The ~ public hearing was closed at 9:47 p.m. I ,II ----- - ----....------ Arden Hill s Council 10 August 31, 1992 . Councilmember Hicks asked about the accuracy of topographical maps. Graham stated that in his experience they are very accurate and it is common to determine drainage using topographical maps, which is what was done in this case, Hicks asked how costly it would be to survey each individual property involved. Graham said surveying would likely cost about $100 per hour, so it would be quite expensive to survey all properties. Councilmember Malone thanked City Attorney Filla and the residents for patiently working through the hearing this evening on this complex, mul ti-faceted issue, He asked Graham if the catch basin in the street was actually moved as reported this evening by residents. Graham stated he was not aware of that until this evening, Ron Nelson and Ron Horwath stated that the catch basin was moved from the Crimmins driveway area to a location by the pond. Nelson said streets were paved in July 1987 when he moved in to his home. Councilmember Mahowald said he appreciates that everyone has toned down discussions this evening. He apologized for the Summary and Response document not being sent out to residents as instructed. He ~,tated that the City is . accepting a large portion of responsibility for this project by accepting the lion's share of project costs; it would have been easier to accept 100% of costs, but it would not be fair to the general taxpayer to do so. He said the City has been seeking a solution since this matter came to the forefront and he understands that assessed residents may not be satisfied with being assessed, but the assessments are appropriate, MOTION: Hicks movedl seconded by Mahowald, to adopt Resol ution No. 92-41 Adopting the Final Assessment Roll for the 1992 Keithson Area Pond Improvement, with assessments as established by Council on July 13, 1992 as follows: ;~ssessments are to be run over a five year period and ca,l cul o.ted on the basis of 100% being equal to $1,500 per lot. lC.O~. benefi t ($1,500 assessment) to lots ',.11. th addre,sses 4527, 4521 , 4509, 4503 Kei. thsori Dd ve; ::-)~. 9(. henpfit ($750 asspssment.) to lots with addresses 4504, 4510, 4516, 4522, 4528, 4534, 4539 F:f>:: J. ~i.'"-;nn Dr:L ',it.? ,: 2596 benefit ($375 as,se,ssment) to 1 at wi th 2ddr~:ss 4540 Keithson Drive. Mot _1 (;,1 carried unanimously (5--0). . .'" . Arden Hills Council 11 August 31, 1992 UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS ACCEPT BID INFORMATION ARDEN PLACE STORM SEWER Engineer Graham advised that three bids were received and opened on August 27, 1992 for Arden Place Storm Sewer Improvements. He added that bidders were asked to provide bids for reinforced concrete pipe (Rep) or high density plastic pipe (HDPE) . Graham recommended the use of HDPE and stated that the lowest bid received was from Ro-So Contracting, Inc. in the amount of $26,048. He stated that he has experience working with Ro-So Contracting and would be comfortable awarding the bid to them, however, Council may wish to conduct the assessment hearing before awarding the bid. Council was further advised that the Public Works Department, upon the direction of Council, arranged for a contractor to make one final attempt to unclog the existing . Arden place drainage pipe, however, they were met with resistance from Ray Johnson, the property owner at 1540 Arden Place, who refused to allow access to his property. Counci 1 was provided a copy of a letter dated August 28, 1992 from Mr. Johnson's attorney. Councilmember Malone commented that the Arden Place drainage issue is a sensitive situation, and although residents have approached the City for relief, he questions whether this is a City problem or a private property problem. Mayor Sather added that the City has attempted to correct the existing clogged pipe, and the residents do have a problem, so the City needs to take some kind of action. Councilmember Growe agreed that not taking some kind of action would likely mean this issue would haunt the City 1 at er. Councilmember Mahowald stated that the City needs to take action regardless of who caused the problem. He suggested waiting until the City appraiser determines whether there would be benefit to residents if a storm sewer project is done. MOTION: Hicks moved, seconded by Mahowald, to accept all bids " v~ in the matter of Arden Place storm Sewer Improvements. " \ Motion carried unanimously (5-0). \: ,"!' ~ . MOTION: Hicks moved, seconded by Mahowald, to order the ~ prepara ti on of the proposed assessment roll, and I schedule a public hearing to be held September 28, 1992 at 7:30 p.m., in the matter of Arden place storm Sewer Improvements. Motion carried unanimously (5-0). .. I fl ----------..----.-- Arden Hills Council 12 August 31, 1992 . Councilmember Mahowald asked that the assessment process be clearly explained in the notices. Attorney Filla stated that individual notices would state the maximum potential assessment assuming the engineer's estimate of construction costs plus overhead, divided by the number of parcels, He added that the actual assessment can be less than the amount listed in the notice, but not more, and would be determined later according to the appraiser's opinion regarding benefit. Engineer Graham said about eight parcels are involved, Attorney Filla advised that if Council wishes to conduct the assessment hearing prior to awarding the project, it would be a tight schedule since bid prices are only good for 90 days. DISCUSSION - 1993 STREET IMPROVEMENTS Council ]~evi ewed a letter dated August 27, 1992 from Engineer Graham wherein Graham suggested Council cone.ider the 1993 street rehabili tation and pavement maintenance program so that necessa!::y feasibility studies and field information can be completed before inclement weather. . Engineer Graham stated that current street ratings indicate that the next two streets requiring reconstruction are Bussard Court (Snelling Avenue to the west cul-de-sac), and Dunlap Avenue (Ingerson Road to Cannon Avenue). Councilmember Mahowald commented that during preliminary budget discussions, it was Council consensus to concentrate on overlay and seal coating projects in 1993 due to limited funds and the fact that several projects were done in 1992. Councilmember Malone said that Council consensus does not preclude taking a look at Bussard Court and Dunlap Avenue. SCHf,DUL ~~~UTH Tl'LT_A):/}'l'J OJ'! HE.P,RItiG13 Council reviewed Truth in Taxation Pro\li_sions from Ramsey County Department of Taxation ano Records Administration, and a memorandlrr~ from staff suggesting possible dates for the Cit.y's Truth in Taxation public bearing. MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Growe, to schedule the City's "" ,...... 1.. ~_ 'I'axation ;.'ublic . . for )1onday, No',]embel- .:. L U L.ll .LLi ,iearlng 3,'1 1992 at 7:30, with a continuation hearing (if v , ~~eeded ) en f.ecembel" 10, 1992 at 7:30. Motion carrie,J unanimously (5 - 0) , . "" . Arden Hills Council 13 August 31, 1992 AUTHORIZATION TO EXTEND PUBLIC WORKS EMPLOYEE TERM OF EMPLOYMENT This agenda item was removed during adoption of agenda, APPROVE SALARY INCREASE FOR DEPUTY CLERK/ZONING ADMINISTRATOR Prior to this evening's regular agenda, during closed session} Council conducted a performance evaluation on Deputy Clerk Iago. MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Growe, to approve a salary increase for Deputy Clerk/Zoning Administrator Catherine Iago to Level 5 of the 1992 Pay Plan effective September 3, 1992 , and to terminate Ms. Iago's duties as Acting Clerk Administrator effective September 7, 1992. Motion carried unanimously (5-0) . Council thanked Deputy Clerk Iago for her extra effort put forth in the last couple of months as Acting Clerk . Administrator. Councilmember Malone commented that it would be appropriate to take necessary action to create a City Administrator authority type government giving the newly appointed City Administrator broader authority. MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Hicks, to direct the City Attorney to draft an appropriate resolution creating broader City Administrator authority type of government. Motion carried unanimously (5-0). SCHEDULE COUNCIL WORKSESSION SEPTEMBER 8. 1992 MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Mahowald, to schedule a Council worksession September 8, 1992 at 4:00 p.m. Motion carried unanimously (5-0). Councilmember Hicks advised that he would be unable to attend the September 8 worksession. REQUEST FOR TENT SALE ZEOS COMPUTER FACTORY OUTLET . Council reviewed an application from Steve Larson, Manager of the Zeos Computer Factory Outlet, requesting permission to erect two tents in front of the Zeos Computer Factory ~ Outlet store at 3787 North Lexington for use as .~ advertisement and a snack bar for Zeos' sale from September .3 through 7, 1992. Arden Hills Council 14 August 31, 1992 . Staff recommended approval of the application contingent upon review of the application by the Fire Chief and Building Inspector to insure the tents meet code requirements. MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Growe, to authorize Zeos Computer Factory Outlet to erect two tents as outl ined In their application, contingent upon review and approval by the Fire Chief and Building Inspector. Motion carried unanimously (5-0) . MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL SUMMARY Councilmember Malone advised that the Finance Committee has worked very hard at put ting together the July 1992 Management Financial Summary and they would appreciate Council input on the s u)"nma r y before the Finance Committee's September 24 meeting, COUNCII, COMMENTS PUBLIC SAFETY/WORKS COMMITTEE Referring to Jerry Miller's resignation accepted this . evening under the consent calendar, Councilmember Growe suggested a letter of thanks be sent to Mr, Mill er for his work with the Public Safety/Works Committee. Council concurred, Growe added that Dick Roessler has volunteered to chair tLe Committee and he would be an asset in that capaci ty. MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Growe, to ratify the appointment of Dick Roessler as Chair of the Public Safety/Works Committee. Motion carried unanimously (5-0) . ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF A~TORNEY FILLA 'ilith regard c ~ the Keittson Pond draInage hearing conducted LU earlier this evenIng! Councilmember Mahowald thanked Attcrney Filla for takir:g the position ~~ spokesperson Ul.. representing the City, clearlY and calmly exp1aining t.he ci rl.:::em.stanc(.;s ,. the and helping maintain surrOllnOlr:s ],ssue I a positive exchange b<?t wee-: t.he City '3no the residents. t~o1Jnci 1 CODc<:,.:rec: . rIJ'Y T" :r'rI G i\.TJ:.o N At At.toi-ney Filla's request! Council met ir: closed for the . purpose of discussing City lit.igat.ion. .. . . , . . AICden Hills Counci 1 15 F.ugust 31, 1992 ADJOURN Council ICeconvened at 10:40 p.m. MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Hicks, to adjourn the meeting at 10:40 p.m. Motion carICied unanimously (5-0) . Thomas R. Sather, MayolC Cathedne Iago, Deputy Clerk NOTICE OF MEETINGS: The next Council worksession will be held September 8, 1992 at 4:00 p.m. at City Hall. The next regular Council meeting will be held September 14, 1992 at 7:30 p.m. at City Hall. . ~ . i ~ ~ I i I J I p . ,. . CITY OF ARDEN HILLS MJH:IlANOOM ~: sept~hP~ 10, 1992 TO: Mayor and city council Dorothy A. Person, Clerk 1\dmi.ni.strator FRCM: Catherine J. Iage, Deputy Clerk/Zoning 1\dmi.ni.strator ~ StlllJECl' : status Report on Appraisals of the Harstad/City Hall sites and Arden Place Drainage Area Mr. Bill CUshman was contacted last week to begin the appraisals for the Harstad, city Hall sites and Arden Place Drainage Irrprovement area. Engineer Graham met with Mr. Ct1shlmn and gave him information regarding the properties affected by the improvement. Mr. CUshman was advise::l that it is l1E'C'E'Ssary to expedite the appraisals. ACI'ION RroUIRED: Council should pass a notion authorizing the expenditure of $5,5000 to . william CUshman for property appraisals for the Harstad, City Hall, and the Arden Place Drainage Illlprovement sites. mIlts Attac::hm;nts . i u ! RUG 31 '92 11:50 ARA,LTD./STEVENSON-EDWARD~ P.1 '"' . . APPRAISAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, LTD. .. STEVENSON-EDWARDS & ASSOCIATES- .. 2310 County Road D . New Brighton, MUlnesota 55112 (612) 636-2565 FAX: (612) 633,0394 (612)633-0 August 31, 1992 Cathy raga City'of Arden Hills , , 1450 West Highway 96 Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112 Re: :Phone conversation regarding appraisals Dear Ms, raga: .,' , We can provide the appraisals requested four to six weeks after you tell us to f proceed. The cost breakdown is as follows: "'- ' ;\; L Arden Hills City Hall $2,500 ) 2. Vacant land area 1,500 1 3. Arden Place (7-10 parcels - storm drainage) 1.500 , $5,500 I ; Thank you for considering us for this work. i Sincerely yours, i c:!~# ~d._-.J ! WIlliam H. Cushman, MAl Certified Federal General Appraiser M'innesota License #4001638 . . CITY OF 1lRDEN HILLS MEMCIlANOOM ~: Sept~~ 10, 1992 TO: Mayor and city council Dorothy Person, Clerk Mministrator FRaoI: catherine J. Iaga, Deputy Clerk/zoning Mministrator ~ SUBJECl': 1992 Charitable Ga1IIblinq Premises Permit The city is in receipt of an application for a new Class B Pull-t.ab:; premise permit at the Ralrada North Hotel, 1201 W. County Road E, Arden Hills, fram the Shoreview Arden Hills Lions Club, Inc. staff has reviewed the application for =pliance to the Charitable Gambling Ordinance criteria, and has determined the dOCl1lllE!lltation requirements have been met and the application is eligible. REalMMENDATION : . staff reconunends approval of the application suhnitted by the Shoreview Arden Hills Lions Club, Inc. ACrION REOUIRED: If Council concurs with the recommendation, they should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 92-62, Approving Gambling Permit Application for Shoreview Arden Hills Lions Club, Inc. for Class B Pull-t.ab:; at the Ralrada North Hotel. CJI:lav M92-62 . . CITY OF ARDEN HILLS RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-62 RESOLUTION APPROVING CHARITABLE GAMBLING PREMISES PERMIT APPLICATION BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED1 that the city of Arden Hills agrees to approve the premises permit for the Shoreview Arden Hills Lions Club, Inc. for Class B Pull-tabs operations at the Ramada North Hotel, 1201 W. County Road E, Arden Hills, Minnesota. Adopted by the Arden Hills city Council this 14th day of September, 1992. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF ARDEN HILLS Thomas R. Sather, Mayor ATTEST: . Dorothy A. Person, Clerk Administrator Councilmember moved adoption of the foregoing resolution and the same was declared adopted upom unanimous yes vote of all members present. witness my hand and seal of office at Arden Hills, Minnesota, this day of , 1992. . ... . .. Minnesota Lawful Gambling 'n Premise Permit Application - Part 2 of 2 .mimJITifw~ia1lh~lm'ljfiffflf'Wijndflfaiilrfti*'I;I~w.BtmNl'it.l.[rU~!r.tfIil1W&1111~i11lli~ilil1ill11i!ttij~g#t#t!1 funk Name Bank A=unt Number, IVijQ /rJJ1fDi'ICIl 2AAl)( J?ty;r!0UF; /I1A/ St"O PC/>l Ban delress C,ty State Z,p ode ~t/'-Io JI}, FI1/lti/;kW /h/h. ,,;?()~6MLL;;-, J-l;/l/',.f5//3",... ffit~lli!!lilll!l!~llfl!I~III[_i.~11_1R!~;.i.9pg:nI'IH':I~I.litffiI111f!ilijlf!lillltl1!111!! '36FFlic.Y I< &GI-fA) .5 bD tll1/iJ B<l4b1! ?T /-r/U t.- ;Ofi~ S/ZJ84/'T 6"fll?y JVitl/ll~iV1/ 67,/0 J.(b1//i/A5/iJAI iJlC ~AI.lJt-cy ;::J/'!y/ /dc35;. c ~E oAt:. ~ f3p.7Jm~Jl / ;J/cf 6'/l-LY/ /j/ 'Sr /J#tL ~?'Tn?PL'/#4 A/4tfl. '(i;;;;iilliig Site Aiii:horlZatlon ,- .1 am the chief executive officer of the organization; I hereby consent that local law enforoement officers, the .1 assume fuli responsibility for the fair and lawfui opera- board or agents of the board, or the commissioner of tion of ali activtties to be conducted; revenue or public safety, or agents of the commissioners, .1 will familiarize myself wtth the laws of Minnesota may enter the premises to enforcelhe law. governing lawful gambling and rules of the board and Bank Records Information agree, if licensed, to abide by those laws and rules, The board is authorized to inspect the bank records of the including amendments to them; gambling account whenever necessary to fulfill .any changes in application information will be submitted requirements of current gambling rules and law. to the board and local untt of government wtthin 10 days . Oath of the change; and I declare that: .1 understand that failure to provide required information .1 have read this application and ali information submitted or providing false or misleading information may result in to the board is true, accurate and complete; the denial or revocation of the license. 'allother required information has been fuliy disclosed; Signal '" ,f Xe utive officer Date 1 .. . . '" . 4. A CODV of the local unit of aovernment's resolution a~. , .1. T~e ctty ,mu~t~,gn ~hls.a~licallOn ff the gambling prem- orovina this aoolication must be attached to this aoolicat,on ! lSes ,s located w~h'n.qty}'m'!s;. " .. . '. '; c . ". .' 5. If this application is denied by the iocal untt of gov?rnment,j ,. 2.. Th~county:'flf;'ID, t?w,ns.~lp ,must SIQ~ thl~ applic~tlon if" tt should not be submitted to the Gambling Control Board. I ' . \ h ' 'bl" '., \'1 '.!~-t d' "h' t 'h" '\" .. , " . ' , , 1'-'. t egam 109 premises. s"-"",, e .w" In"a owns 'p",.,_".:;,..~," ., ., -- ,_. -0., ._-',: ' 3."Th~ local u~~ goverrimen.t (city or co.untY) .must pa$~ a Township: By signature beiow, the towns~ip ackno~le?g?s : resolut,on spec,flcally appr~vlng or denYing thiS applicat,on. that the organization is applying for a prem,ses permit Within i township limits. , , elt ',,'or' Count .. Townshl .. j \ . -,....-.:........" \. ~-'~'. .--'" \. ., . . . --. City orCounly /'jame ..-. Townsh,p Name _.k:~.'.r:";""-<""',,~,: : [?:y\. ;.bi~ "', '.., .,' ., ,,', ;,!c'i'k'h;$:~{!i.i~ ,s~~~re 01 Per:o~ "';i,~ng~~~tian "" c ";;'.i,,,,-,,;;,,~o-,'O;;i'lC"-- ,"';'''' MfnnesotaLaw....1Gambllng --", .'___ "", ! .:!~~_f~.;:?~::,\1.,;!":~::'::J,~'.0.:.:.:.. ._. "'_"-'-' Uu, :~ ' ' -----' " ;;~remise Permit Application - Part 2 of 2 .- . " , - - -~., '''''"?"w&.:-~X'<<1m'!m~ws;fft:~%..~::;.::(..:~,,,%,~,~,:(?:,,,, ;':""~' ;.:~-::t:*x-'''''~ ~?;;~~I~WWWf.a'f~:::;:~t%:j_~:W~1'~4~*,~;"i. ;~Wfw~~Wrtr_wii~W1@t?t*Mo/.&' *mficit~~ht.W%lf:ttit.'M .: tl:j-ff4f.t%t1~ uq.:u:iu 'In . :m.an~:b....eo:un.tr.;J~. : .:y;, .~. '. 'wa;:J:on.ffi.:.;::.:;::*~*.::::.~::::::~:A:~:~~:;:*.~:::::::::::g::J.:~tmm('~~*,i:t:= ..:*,..:.::..;-~:::::-:.:f:f:f.::::::;:r~}:::.x:X:::;"'}X~:~:~:.,-::.....,.,::::.:i~:.....:,:::".~::X~::::::::::::::::.:: &~k Na~ " ",., " . . Bank Account Number !l1JQJt/J1tDe;CIJ 21Wk /f.04etl/'/J~ ~AJ ,f'~ .!/.t?/~7 Bank ddress CIty tate Zip I :J.ljl/o /\J FI'f/!ti//;;;W /h/k. j((J~&!/iLL~ H1#. i?5//~ .(~tl\lIli!!~~1Ifgll.li.tl_BI!~1I_.~"'4~1.111!llll,iili.l[jrfJ "36FF;t~y I<GGHAJ 5bD till-ill 13ttdeAI "771'-/fUt.. ;O!l-;3;S/.l}edlT GA/?y ft1ull/:;'S/lI 67'1t:> J<~AlA:57iJAJ PIC r::-~/j)LCY ;:;47/ /d~ ~ ~1E{)Ac,~ f:3P.JJIY1r=/l /~/J 6"/lL)///]/ ~T/~L ~Y'1>>1bL//Y4 ...0'4'Al. r*w*.oW.?e-J[~fleMm:f:%f!.SlWitm4J1fHf~f:ff$#.Mt@t:l!4UtWM.i11Im1t?JlJjill~mr$,';imW%I{nt.1tm;[(tWf,~l~@lmMff$_[ll*]!w. .,] ~::~~~:f~R~~~~~:~r::~::~*MitW!1:~~~:z~;~;~z~~~~r~r:;~;~r::!~1.i!1;;i~ board or agents of the board, or the commissIoner of .', ,tion of all activ~les to be conducted; " " revenue or public s~fety, or agent~ of the cornmiss~n'ers'.fwill iamiliarize myself with the laivs of Minnesota":' may enter the prem,ses to enforce the law. governing lawful gambling and rules of the board and Bank, Records Information agree, tllicensed. to abide by those laws and rules, , The bollrd is authorized to inspect the bank records of the including amendmentslo them; ga~?lingll.ccount whenever n~cessary to fuffill 'oanychanges i~application infClrl)1,ation will be suOO1il!ed requirements of current gambling rules and law. to the board and local un~ of government w~hln 10 days . Oa~h.,..., of the change; and '" ", 1 declare that: . .1 understand that failure to provide required information 01 have read this appiication and all iQformation submitted or providing false or misleading information may result in to the board is true, accurate and romp/ete; the denial or revocation of the license. oaU other required information has been fully disclosed; Signat fe , f xe ulive officer Date 1 ~@tr.~~}:.m:N .' @:<->. *....,.:-.~::::::'=:9....:::::-w.-:wj>>W-=*w.-:-l0>>>:.. -*:::->>.<:o-*~_~_"',' '.m>=AA:${ox-:,:;m::W.',,:,':-::.::wIll;-:":'3Y"::::X **im::::::{{:}:::' ':}:-:::-::::-'i~,< :::-:::r::r<<.:::m:~:Wft@$X:' '~~::::::"~'<r.~it-..*~ 'y:.? ....-:={::'-=;....{f ...'...... x oX. ~;~'&:.~~~.::j,"WI:1~~.:::::f.~;'<<~....,..~,. ~1~~ :<<~4&'.'" . t .~lm/%7ittNfu:t~..:i~rw*'?.m:*t.:Mlm:,:f::!:.1;,:-m .<:~,..~...~.~<<.:.at>::;<.>>>>~: . " .~n:;.m:E&~A~V<A{q9lP~b... ..>>~t~~, . ;;'~dffAA '<~". :::'.:t=t*~,.... ~1:%:~~:~~}1:;:~~N":"@:~:::_: ... mtm~ :~_:::?m . * . .... '. 4. Aroovofthelocalunitofoovernment'sresolutionao- !. T~e cnY',f11~s.Is.lgn ~h's.a~llCa!lO~tl,th~ gambhngprem- orovino thisaoolication must be attached to this aoolicatio~. Ises IS located wnhln Clty limns ".,'.'.., , "" .<.'..... "'ed' " h' 10' 'I . 'f 'L' . t ..-'. '.,; ,-- -~' '. C',-,' .,'.--." ", "':;":ic," ''';,,-.i.-.--,.' __ ,:-,' ,",'," ;',.". 5.11 th,s apphcatl~.n IS deD' . "bYJ e", ca ,un,t() .go\l.~r.~r:n.n , .' .. 2. The COur'lty"*AND,townshlp*!must sign th,s aoohcat,on tl. ",""., ." "'.'" .--!-",' ' __ ..,"'c'. .....,." "~ ,__ "":".- p.", --," -- -- ;,"~ ".",., , ".,. -- ":'.", ." ", '".. ("Ai!..;' ';.f-\n~h!,~n?__t__~.~Ubmilled,tClt~e~~,~.b'-I~~ Ccint{oIBo~rdi <j-,'__":,,,/,{ "...,-tk,. .,.the,gall1bIIQgPJ~I1)IS~s.ls,lOOated,\Vnhln,~,ow~s!J'p., '(,' ; ":',""'r-~...L...,...",.:.,,....,~_________.____,,-,o1\__'''''.~~..__~__~'&L\O::'..S-:, ,.;,_"._. ,-- ., 3)"The IOc8.1 un~goiiernment (c;tyorcouhty) must p~sa':.r!'] 'To~n~hlp:; By'Sig~':;ure 'oeki,"y the tow.nship~m)wledges resoluti,'?!) ~p~if'9-lIy~pr'>reving,!r .de~Yir'g,m!s. a,ppl~t!()~:.. tliat llie oq;"-nizaiion is aPPlying' for a premises permit withi." ' ,: --, "," __ township limits. .. '.' -. ../ . ->'" --'.; \, ,~ - ..---. -'---- .------,---.- ._______u_. ,W__u__ m___ --0"__- ~-~---_._- - . . -- ----I ! /~' _ -~'..J. " l-_, ,r" " ;, .,1 ~"" ()l! " ;' ;" h " -f/l C. ' '-' , ~ " ---_..._._----_.._~-- ------- --.. " I,) -.--- ------, -'-'" --.. . ~-_.. _ '_m ~ / ~-,-) <,,' 1': Jr".'J:'f:",'<I; /1/) ;;,.,.>;1 -'--!' /~..-' ~ ......;-c,/l.-::;~,:_;..... . ..,~.,-t.~ V l'''--'~-- " " -- llO)f CUll) ." f; '-'- t'l \ , gop7J.j /ih:'A ! 3b SQ FI, ?' i '.,) !i: -~-- I , " d ~ ~_lj / --- ......-..-- ----- I (~-- /f"/ ---- _n.____._ -- --_._~~.._.._- ---..--..--..-.'-. ,/ . f?1!- /l1 It 7J A- ycJ!if/ HPIE t. ~ CtM/ .h:/ edf c:' 6' c of) / 2/- /.20/ W, CO, Kb E, - 1ft!! l)e;r'J f/H.I-,S! /11 A..J 5G'1/;J.. G . . . CITY OF ARDEN HILLS MEM:IlANOOM DM'E: SeptAmher 11, 1992 ro: Mayor and City Council Dorothy A. Person, Clerk 1\dm:ini.strator :FRCM: catherine J. Iago, Deputy Clerk lU SUBJECT: Bingo Hall License - Arden Hills Bingo Hall (Pot 0' Gold) Attached is a bingo hall license application fran Robert Grootwassink to operate Arden Hills Bingo Hall (Pot 0' Gold), 3776 Connelly. Mr. Walsh has sold his interest in the hall to Mr. Grootwassink, therefore, this is classified as a "new" license. ~ON: Staff recarnmends that this application be approved as requested. ACI'ION RElJUIRED: . If council ==s with the staff recammendation, they should pass a motion, under Consent, approving the bingo hall license application as requested, pending approval of Ramsey County Sheriff's Deparbnent. CJI/lav Attachment M92-63 . -~) ':Ii -m n {j - , . CITY OF ARDEN HILLS . RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-63 RESOLUTION APPROVING BINGO HALL LICENSE APPLICATION BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED, that the city of Arden Hills agrees to approve the Bingo Hall License Application for the Arden Hills Bingo Hall (Pot O'Gold) from Mr. Grootwassink at 3776 Connelly, Arden Hills, Minnesota. Adopted by the Arden Hills City Council this 28th day of September, 1992. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF ARDEN HILLS Thomas R. Sather, Mayor ATTEST: . Dorothy A. Person, Clerk Administrator Councilmember moved adoption of the foregoing resolution and the same was declared adopted upon unanimous yes vote of all members present. witness my hand and seal of office at Arden Hills, Minnesota, this 28th day of September, 1992. '~. r I . " , t ~, ~ I ~ ~ FOR OFFICE USE ONLY . Fee Oate_ LG300 Chk Initial I (Aerv.1CV3019Oj Minnesota Lawful Gambling license # . Bingo Hall License Application - Part 1 (See instructions for completion ofthis application) Is this application for a new license, or a renewal? i:2J New 0 Renewai ;i~l(fY;0II~~~ltiil'qljlt~~t~,~~~!il%ll1i'[Jl~fJ!]~&lii\jlltill~1~i*;tfuli!ttl;ii!*ltl;il1*llflllililltl1ifiti!11ttll!1\It.j~11ff!!lil111i!litlll!1;IJ!;ill;!;1;;i;i; 1. 2. City Zip code .rJ NY 3. is the bingo hall located within city limits? Yes I8J .'I!fll;"!1;~ln:~.IIWt~IIKlmQ~t~4jllg1g#;~'lnl~II;JIj~l~Itfl~;tilli!li!itilill~f;~111l~lf!!il!i!ri!i!i!11il1111!!!tl'li!!I!lil~l;li! 4. Name ollegalgwner of bingo hi property Phone L) ~ -: CPt/ , rG/dJ 4.v- Business Mail g Address State , cf' S. Names of all owners, officers, Irectors, partners, managers and supervisors (each person named must fill out a separate Bingo Hall Personnel Information form, LG315 and Affidavit, LG316) a. ;F),ht7 nl- t: htJP.h./b'C-</4->fI. k. b. 9. I. . c. h. m. d. i. n. e. j. o. !tfR~fm!l&..ll.I.l.l:if.llllllllwr{t.:'t.\ifiNw.lilll!it\ll{1;;i;i+tll!lt.rll1!i{'~f,;~;lr11fliilil1!1;i.l1 6. J.lv 5'/0) tlS!!.- -p:J)(:JD:k g"Ufilmc~iW~X'~:'~:;:;:~::~'%\N%~0Wf%~'1;:;::%@"~~%\~~;;:~::~~"4i~\~$l%mwww', :.. .n~'>".m.";';.:;..: {?>~;:,~;;-:-}:~",::xn~~tt~J : ...ltdt*k,>>%@:~..~@fi..w1dfu1tA%TIH&Wi0J.m:t'W~:::*:mtt*ttt%t:if::fq%~d?1.w~~t~B*'tkdW@k*0~tdlli~~m!~tt~~t:;M~:m%i 7. Have/do any persons listed in items 4 and 5: Yes No a. been convicted of a felony? D ~ b. ever been convicted of a crime involving gambling? D E c. ever held a bingo halllicensa previously in Minnesota? D "0 d. owe delinquent taxes in excess of $500 as defined in Minnesota Statutes section 270.72? D ~ e. ever been convicted of assault, criminal violation involving the use of a firearm, or making D ~ terroristic threats? f. after demand. not filed tax returns required by the Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue? D [Sa . 8. Are any of the individuals listed in nems 4 or 5. or a parson holding a financial or managerial interest in the bingo hali, or affiliate thereof _ D ~ . a licensed distributor or' affiliate of the distributor under section 349.161? . a licensed manufacturer or affiliate of the manufacturer under section 349.163? D 0- . an affiliate of a wholesale distributor of alcoholic beverages? n 15<1 LG315 Minnesota Lawful Gambling (R&y.(10r'31~ Bingo Hall Personnel Information DgQ)fI'qm:~ifl:q]ITLlfrtllwl~J.itit.lf~ftlllll.1m~rnljllllt.ll~!1TIi;lrl.~t!111!!11!11;,111~li!1,ill!l;j'illl;l!il:!i 1. Name ~ngo hall _ ~ Phone 8-/ ///'/~l.i MI/ <&/,;{ ) b3/ /7;)4 ).y. .l/ M /; ~ . Address Cily Slale Zip code S 7 76' (t7,vLr-t2-/I~ ,4;-.( .4//-/0/;;;/1<; -#/// ~S-// .:2-- g&.J1fl'-~1!r!::(f)~~i.lal'I~]!tj!;11!W~;il~j{lI;11\.!tl~it!11It1.!1!lmjl!!iltifil@i1It\t!ll;!!;ij!!jltlll!ill!!lil!lliillljii';llliil'il,lijijjjjjilli;i 2. Last Name First Name;!- Full Middle Name -;)3-/.1-. Dates of Service U,S. Citizen Yes No If no, fill in re istration number: 6. Your position with bingo hall (check one) 0 Sole Proprietorship C Director 0 0 Partner go Corp. Officer 0 Work phoneWld, ) (j3J9tJ60 Your du iesi- D ,i//c '" 7. Employment record for past 1 0 years (include periods of unemployment 0 , Employer Address Type of Business Position Held Dates of Employment SI>/;::- -I. ,/, 5~/-I /117 r J?,,/4;{fAP .5/,yy / IrS / . '5/,t'Jj Nn,h... Y '''''''<;Jwi''/'((f h T?:-I' J);1h)- ,It (?Z< .4;v ;~p 5<- . , j/~ 407(7 fCr.-/-4' .,to"yo 1'0 Ii::. B. Place of residence for past 10 years Address City State Zip code Dales of Residence . 1..t;3 s-7 I/" / ~.5C I,/"".I';k M.tr .PP'P//"// ,-0//// -5;4"'<L-I- 7 /777' 9. Criminal history statement (except petty misdemeanors). If none, write 'none." Dale Charge C::y and Stale Disposition d<-:J P't??- 10. Name, address, and license or exemption # of any organization you be'ong to which conducts lawful gambling. tf none, write "none." Organization License or Exemption Number Address ~ CJ r?-" t:/../ Zip Code City State Organization License or Exemption Number Address City State Zip Code J ded8ls thai this applicalkm ;s CZJ"ecl and romp/ele to the best of f77J' .'.:now/edge and beDel. I understand thar false and misfeading answet's are grounds/or denial of Rcense cr :e'rOcation of any licenses granted. YO~#e _4f~;6;d4/;L Date . tJ' ~ 9- /Y'/2 - Attach this form to Bingo Hall PersonneiAffidavit, LG316 Mail to: Department of Gaming - Gambling Control DivisIon Rosewood Plaza South, 3rd Floor 1711 W. County Road B Rosevllle, MN 55113 . Minnesota Lawful Gambling Bingo Hall License Application (LG300) . Part 2 . RJ."brBH[~If;~11flili;lili~ljrW4t'iliijffiil~lilit~!lil!i~11;iR\rfilf!ijlii!iilili~wiijlln~TI;;lt;~1~jf,!lilljliliJi!1\11jjjmiilItl11jli:l11tmfll@;illmiliilll;'il111iitililiiiliiiij;:j;jl~;i!lll;l[if:illlil.il I declare that this application is correct and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. I will familiarize myself with the laws of the state of Minnesota and rules of the Board regarding gambling and agree, if licensed. to abide by those laws and rules, including amendments to them. Changes in the information submitted in this application will be submitted io the Board and local government unit within ten days after the change occurs. 9. Signature 01 chiet ecutive office of the lessor Date Name (please print) Title 9-9'- /f. ' 10, Name of person completing this form Ti~e Phone ( ) 1. The city' must sign if the bingo hall is located within city limits. 2. The county" AND township" must sign if the bingo hall is iocated within a township. 3. The iocal government (city or county) must pass a resolution specificaliy approving or denying the application. 4. A copy of the resolution approving the application must be attached to the application. 5. An application which is denied by the locai governing body should not be submitted to the Gambling Control Division. Township By signature below, the township acknowledges that the organization is applying for a bingo halllice'nse within townShip limits. C~' or Countv" Township" 11. City or county name 12. Township name . Signature of person receiving application Signature of person receiving application Title Date received Title ~ Township official Date received Name of person delivering application to local government Is township? organized unorganized unincorporated D D D f.!l!Ug!illm!~,)liftiii!llr.llm:;iqtl!rg.l{g~~m@1~.ttl11~llif~tt~WWf.i@ll~ilm~~][@t~~M~~!~~ln~l} . Form LG300, Bingo Hall License Application, Parts 1 and 2 . Form LG302, Bingo Hall Occasion List . Form LG315, Bingo Hall Personnel Information (for each person listed in item 4 and 5 on form LG300) . Form LGS16, Bingo Hall Affidavit, (for each person ilsted in item 4 and 5 on form LG300) . Check for license fee of $2,500, made payable to "Slate of Minnesota" ~""l.1lf.E~1_I~q{i~m:.~%!gg~'If.lgi\1I~~1%.f$.!11iljlI11[!1!~~!111~!&;;&i!11\.1~fl111 Department of Gaming Gambling Control Division Rosewood Plaza South, Srd Floor 1711 W. County Road B Roseville. MN 55113 . . LG316 Minnesota Lawful Gambling (lOI30f.IQ) Bingo Hall Personnel Mfidavit STATE OF /h/.I//Y~ Sol-/( ) AFFIDAVIT OF QUALIFICATION . ) S.s. FOR BINGO HALL LICENSE AND CONSENT STATEMENT (Pursuant to Minnesota Statute 349.164) I, 'j, , under oath state that: (type or print) 1. I have not been convicted of a felony. 2. I have never been convicted of a crime involving gambling. 3. I do not owe delinquent taxes in excess of $500 as defined in Minnesota Statute section 270.72. 4. I am not a licensed distributor or affiliate of a distributor under section 349.161. 5. I am not a licensed manufacturer or affiliate of a manufacturer under section 349.163. 6. I am not a wholesale distributor of alcoholic beverages. 7. I will not provide any staff to conduct or assist in the conduct of any lawful gambling on the premises. 8. f will not acquire, provide storage control or inventory control, or report the Use of any gambling equipment used by an organization that conducts lawful gambling on the premises. 9. I will not provide accounting services to any organization conducting lawful gambling on the premises. 10. I will not solicit, suggest, encourage or make any expenditures of gross receipts from fawful gambling of an organization. . 11. I will not charge a fee to a person without which the person could not playa bingo game or participate in another form of lawful gambling on the premises. 12. I will not provide assistance or participate in the conduct of lawful gambling on the premises. 13. I will not prepare bingo packets. In addition, I understand, agree and hereby irrevocably consent that suits and actions relating to the subject matter of the attached bingo hall license application, or acts or omissions arising from such application, may be commenced against me in any court of competent jurisdiction in Minnesota by service on the Minnesota Secretary of State of any summons, process or pleading authorized by the laws of Minnesota. By signature of this document, the undersigned authorizes the Department of Public Safety to conduct a background , check or review and to share the results with the Lawful Gambling Control Board. Failure to provide required information or providing false or miSleading information may result In the denial or revocation oflhe license. FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT, except that this Affidavit and Consent Statement are submitted in support of the application for bingo hall license application from the Lawful Gambling Control Board. Subscribed and sworn to before me this d.4/~~~ (Signature of applicant - Bingo Hall Personnel) ,dn/, #' /1;/15 !3 /11/'.-" JI,// , . Name of Bingo Hall . 0/3 d 'd~-qq Bingo Hall License Number My commission expires ., . CITY OF ARDEN HILLS . RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-64 RESOLUTION CLARIFYING PROPOSED SUMS OF MONEY TO BE LEVIED FOR LEVY YEAR 1992 PAYABLE IN 1993 BE IT RESOLVED by the Arden Hills City council that the following proposed sums of money be levied for levy year 1992, payable in 1993 upon taxable property in said city of Arden Hills for the fOllowing purposes: General Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,481,472 Aerial Platform Ladder Truck . . . . . . . 82,460 certificate of Indebtedness Capital Equipment Program #1 . . . . . . . 26.068 $ 1,590,000 PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS THIS 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1992. e THOMAS R. SATHER, MAYOR ATTEST: DOROTHY A. PERSON, CLERK ADMINISTRATOR e . , CITY OF ARDEN HILIB . ~ mTE: sept-Nn- 10, 1992 TO: Mayor, City eouncil and Dorothy Person, Clerk 1ldmini.strator ~:@ Terry Post, City 1\COClUIltant SUBJECT: Budqet Il\lpact of Information Received SUbseqUent to ReVisions FraIl BUdget worksession #3 (9/2/92!fem:)) Since Irr:f 9/2/92 Memo documenting revisions fram b.Jdget worksession #3 was issued, additional financial information has been received that :i:qlacts the preliminary I:.udget the City will be certifying to the County Auditor on 9/15/92. NEW DATA FRCM RAMSEY CDUNTY: 1- Fiscal Disoarities A total of $123,100 was previously estilnated, of Vlhich $115,000 was directed to the General Fund. 'Ihe up:lated County estilnate is $120,481, of Vlhich $112,250 will be receipted to the General Fund. 'Ihe net :i:qlact to the e General Fund is a revenue reduction of $2.750. 2. HAC1\. A total of $77,600 was previously estilnated, of \>oIhich $75,000 was directed to the General Fund. 'Ihe up:lated County estllnate is $79,149, of \>oIhich $73,745 will be receipted to the General Fund. 'Ihe net :i:qlact to the General F'UI'rl is a revenue reduction of $1.255. 3. Recvclinct sroRE Grant A total of $18,920 was previously estilnated. The up:lated County estilnate is $19,449. 'Ihis revision has no :i:qlact on the General Fund and only :i:qlacts the Recycling Enterprise Fund (#603). The 1993 proposed General Fund revenue has been reduced by a net $4005 as a result of the Fiscal Disparities and HAC1\. up:lates referred to above . As the General Fund was previously showing a $6 surplus for 1993 i these up:lates now put the General Fund into a $3999 deficit condition. ~ON 'ro ELIMIN1I'J':E 1993 PROrosED DEFICTr staff advises in=easing the 1993 Certified and Tax Levies by $4000 to over=me the projected deficit. 'Ihe :i:qlact of this change would be to show a 3.94% Certified Levy increase ($1,590,000 vs. $1,529,678) over e 1992 and a ....m Tax Levy increase ($1,390,370 vs. $1,385,696) over 1992. . PAGE TIIlO J:lU1JW:1.r IMP1lC1' MEH> '!his Certified 12vy percentage in=ease is within the Council guideline to keep such in=ease less than 4%. DELINOUENCY ASSUMPI'IONS It appears that the two most =itical assurrptions i.:rrpacting the 1993 General Fund budget are the degree to which =rent ad val=em taxes and HACA will be collected. To dOClllllel1t the assumptions used a "Deli.nquency Analysis" schedule is attached for your review. As you will note, the planned deli.nquencies of $124,770 (7.86% of the Certified 12vy) appear aggressive with respect to pri= years budgets and actual experience. However, the 50% reserve for HACA ($40,000) appears prudent given the collection history of this state aid. 'Iherefore, the aggressiveness = optllnism in the delin::[uency assurrption arises from the 4.89% rate used f= =rent property tax collections. Historically, this would be a conservative rate f= the City. But in the last two years, the rates have been 9.26% (1991) and 7.00% (1992 est). If the 1993 collection experience parallels the 1992 estimate, e the revenue shortfall may be approximately $20,000. 'Ihe alternatives to offset this risk include: - Reducing expenditures $20,000 to =eate a plarmed 1993 surplus of $20,000. - Not being as conservative in reserving HACA. Moving $20,000 from plarmed HACA into property tax reserve would result in anticipating to collect 75% of HACA instead of the =rent 50%. - Evaluating if 1991 & 1992 collection experience was an aberration from historical trends or the beginning of a new benchmark level. - Increasing the Certified 12vy by $20,000 (a 5.25% increase) to =eate a planned surplus of $20,000. - Finding additional revenue sources (i.e., increasing various permit = license fees). Exploratory work in this area is =rently being researched by a SUbcommittee of the Finance Committee. staff recommendation is to be less conservative on HACA receipts while also anticipating a higher level of pennit/license revenue based upon price increases. 'lhe i.:rrpact of these two revenue sources should mitigate any further reduction of expenditures or increase in the Certified 12vy. MARKEl' VALUATION FOOINOI'E e During the b..1dget worksession process, there was same anticipation on . P1\GE THREE BtiU>J:1J: IMP1\Cl' MEH:) behalf of Council that the estilnated 1993 Market Valuation would show a modest in=ease. However, infonnation supplied by Ramsey county (see attached) indicates a .05% decrease ($470,742,500 to $470,495,600) in total market valuation and a 4.84% decrease ($11,134,617 to $10,595,922) Total Tax Capacity after Fiscal Disparities :in1pact. I will be present at the September 14, 1992 Council meetin; to discuss any issues raised in this memo and to be a staff resource as the adoption of the 1993 Preliminary Budget is deliberated. TRP:rk e I . ._, C \ 1'"1 ($= Ag,D$L I.ll I..I..Sw ' . r!;;;:;:;-j~ C'v\;~,~DGE___w OlfL..1Nq\.\$-\C'C.-AN Ih.. "'~__-, ;,;:::,:;: 1 _ . eK HI" ,4~ 7- p.19.'i3_ . ,uf%c. \QT10N p,,,,o "'<:'" ~,l{) ~I' I\.OfuS'f1L i ---.l__~" ill i Ii LII 'IiI ,I ,II ,I 2 ! I- E'~ "rfi ~ i:l "I I.! . :, I ,.' , ---- I I I I I It" I' I'" " 3 'ii ! i i ! I i I ! i i 4 C t:JLji f-' E- Ii' I I , ;2'il:X,~ i ';L..~ 17B ':;'fI!)On 5 "'f""1JN ~.\>-l I I ill HB ~7(p II II i \;~ ~lo \ )~b;70 , 'I ' 'I ' I' 'I i" I' i, i' " 6 I .:. I I r , I I '! I Ii: i ! 7' , II I II ! I I lL I ! II~_J 8 0 U-A.CA- I !~GZDII 1+ ?,"7"1 ~D \~ nB i7':' l.\~ ' 91 <t......1 I~ h I / zo..o\'l) i, I' /... IIC:; wi..' ~ /.\COOO) 10 I II II II!! II I I I'] I . I I II 1 11' 0,,..,. II"- >1 ro, I \.~L.'iY/) II!! 1'.001 (j!j '2.'i~....11 121 bIll \J~ \..J 'l. bey., II i! 1\.bl.f<" 2~-3~".- 1 13 '" I II I I !, I I Ii', II II 1 14; " I~S(~L l),S ij lin B, 11.\ B7 O,!3 \~; ,,, ~,",z.. \oP.~'\C) \U ItB\' , 151 -s. .~kiliktf'k"! I I, IfB~""" ,I, II t.. ,111'2'7 ~ I, 161 i!!! i! I' I' ! I II i II II ! I ,I (a 17 o,^ .ill,""1 /) I II H 2., ~,l> I i I q, 11,' ~2~~_ll,. ~\t<<f,~ ,:' .. 18' Vr,-, T tt-" L6 '( I ,! i I I ,I '3 fa i:.' I " ~t1o' :;--ore. ' 19 I i I II II I I Iii i Iii I I' ii' I I i 1 20 I ,0 \-lArA --\-- fi Cil)l ~. i I II I ,I' i ! I I I I I Ii', I, I i I 2 21'1 i:1 i I Iii I I! III II i i i I Ii, 2 22 U/b C~./l;J 'V . : 1'. '3 '70 ' I! . f7 'Yo z.~ '!Jf>Jo : 23 Ol~ '~ U ,N I I ~:. ,~,o/" I! I ~ . . '~f<;> i3,~)..~ 2 24 I Iii 1 I I I I, I I' I I ,I i ,1 25 ' ".' .i I I ,',' I i I .1 i, I II i', I! i 2 26 i i" ulZJl.l!'NI]~!' \ I ~i \~).l n't \ !.~I .00 I ;}.f~D \ fal;~ . 27 i , .J.. ~ ,. I I ,Ii) ~ I ",5?J) I ?\f "~~'2 "_.LCu [fihj7 V ,'7mo' : 28 i I I. I II ,I. I I I" I , 2 07 _.~~_I,.. " , It) .... ..;..;"t ,~u,' 29 'k ...\ . "'. 1J.. ,., h \!)'~ '.1Ji' 0 1 I. [)u lz> '. O'T 0' 2 30' G7,.., ~ L. ' I ~L ,~ "::, . 'Z.. W,,:l 0/... '7. 72.% ~,bO r... . 31 I ' I I I I. II 'I I! i I! 32 . "'-qr~ \ l~ /II ~ I I I 1 I I I ! I I 33 ", '..~,,>'O~ . ~., ", .. I I I I: 34 I' . I ' , I I Ii. ,_ 35 .\-lAtA- 1 '2.~o ii, I' Ci)'k [.)2..% 36 I f;rc4L D 51'&.,~' I II . ~~~ 'I i ii_II' 47,~ ,I, ~1;Q. " .. 37' t\1)\lAI ~ " ; 1L~ 0 . L.' ,;'r" 13.7~r" 17; )C)'%lr w. 3~ ~ 0 . . 38 , 1"- ~I.. I I I iPl m1r"':]. ~b'f" 39 , t\~ ~ 1 I i I llL ! I ! i! 'i 1 I I . I L 401 . I I I {Bc3'Z.\7 II I , 'L...')'20....../I1.\Jj7fO -- . --"~-~-'. . II I I I I! I I 1 I i I I! ! II 'I i! i , . . . . CITY OF ARDEN HILlS VAIIJATIONS 1991 - 1993 REV090492 1991 1992 1993 ACIUAL ACIUAL ESTIMATED Market Value Real Prcperty $457,413,200 $464,928,100 $464,611,200 Personal Property 5.814 .400 5.814.400 5.884,400 Total Market Valuation $463.227.600 $470.742.500 $470.495.600 e Tax Caoacitv Real Property $ 13,188,691 $ 12,700,274 $12,094,555 Personal Property 287.814 277.017 276.568 Subtotal $ 13.476.505 $ 12 .977 .291 $12.371.123 Fiscal Disparities ContriWtions: - To Pool < 2,782,312> <$ 2,698,817 > <$2,659,372> - From Pool $ 958.820 856.143 884.171 - Net ContriWtion < $1.823.492> <$ 1.842.674 > <$1.775.201> Total Tax Capacity Valuation After Reduction F= Fiscal Disparities Contrib.rtion $11.653.013 $ 11.134.617 $10.595.922 e . '" m 0 '" '" 0 > Ul a: a: o ~ 0 0:& I;; OJ 0 "'''' Ul 8 l'< 0 g ~ ~ g ;0 ........ OJ ~ ,.: NcO": g ,.: '" '" M - ~ lOci" I,'" coo> z < '" o8~ ~ o ... ~ g g 0 "'''' a: g (:) ~ o ~ ~ ~ ........ o c.o CD 0 Ul LOr.: NcD':ui!O '" "'''' i M .... C\J ..- 1<l NO - " '" ~ 8 g 0.... ~ ~ 0'" Ul - ~ -' '" < <.l '" Og~~'lg 0 '" '" gJ to ....lO M '" '" '" '" ~ " a: ......cocou)cici ,.: ,.: I .~ OJ - ~ '" " W f- . 8 ~ 8 00 OJ 00 .(!) ~ '" z e>g '" .; '" N en :J (!)'" - ..J W ..Jf-en , H g "'0 :i:w< zUl ~ "'0 -0 co " z(!)c:l :;- ltiM '" o If: .; <'i e Well <0 el::lel C::c:lW 0 0 g8Sg8 0 ",co <..J~ '" 8 0 0 OJ co OJ M r-.. co 0 ~ ,a: ,.: ..; ~ re " u.i5a. ~ .; ~ '" '" 0-0 ~~c:: Ul 0 tii 8 g 8 8'" ~ l!l '" '" _ua. z M OJ :& :& ~ .... .... u C') < Ul ,.: 00 ciaS": '" '" "'- z a: M - ~ .; '" Ol Ul to "OJ Ol !z ,.... :;;: a: 0 00 :; Ul ~ ,'" to file 88:gg8 888888HU8 o8~~ouoO g ~ '" '" ~ ~~ ~~ ~ '" 0 ~ ~ ",Iii Ilia) u;": ~g~~~g..; 'i ";a$u;..n(f}oLfic-:i '" '" "'.... O(!) '" OJ ~ ~ ai"; - "'''' ll.Cl OJ OJ 0::> a:..1Il ll. ."',' ; -' .... '" w z .... w Z z <0 Zc: 0 0:'" ~ :E ....l W < tii~ ....!!! ~ '" ~ t -'~ o u.. ::c r-=~S :i ...J...J U) W U,I c.. 0 '" (!)< ii' ~~~~~ ~cne: -' co:! 15 ~ ~ < a: >-- < ::>f- a: < 0 Z W ~~=>:;" iliilJ=> z g OJ'" Ul o ::.!:u~ lb Ooz 0:0 ;;: OJUl ."c <ooww ..J~w '" ~E g~~ ~ Cl.cn~oQ) ~ @ 0>'" e ;~ <Il g" "- ~~ ::r.:::X"zt5gwoa:c :; ~ '" < ~ ~ < t: 0:: a: ffi ~ IX: a: z 0 <- @ "- a: '" <<w_ <O-:r> ~5l!l~ Qch~ t;::;~~~:=5 0.. 0..... D..a:a:5a: w ;!'r; ::ega..~< WW:>l-ccwoLtj Oc: !:;!:;i5i5l5lefil~ffi 8 SSa:a:~S:< "'ffi" 33U)U)3::lW~(j -' IX 0 < (I)...J OJ __I~ OJ 0....:5 W~(I) ..,JOx: 0 wwffiffi_:::!2~o '-' I; m<~~~o c...ll..,<<oo..3W(f.l~a: ~~~(!)~~tl:o~ <Il _" :t: '" ~ ~~?:~g~u.~ie...J~ :rJ:zz co::!: :> :;6 .... ('of to) ..... It) (Q"CI;)Q)~::~~;!~~ ~~~~~~rJCSl!J ~ ~z OJ D. ~,. . CITY OF ARDEN H'LLS SUMMARY COMPAR'SON OF REVENUE WITH REVENUE OF PRIOR YEARS 1".- :;:::,:,1,' ,":;, :-':j ,; :,~;.i,> ,:I,411.1:'llllllil~.1111 GENERAL FUND Property Taxes 1,284.489 1,353.736 1,432.582 1,367,240 ',382.850 . licenses and Permits 129,n3 160,990 123,$31 187.700 145,200 Intergovernmental Revenue 143.729 166,231 118,170 135.668 199,145 Charges for Services 25,083 25,031 38,700 20,900 23,000 Fines and Forfeits 28.543 29,541 26,000 25,000 25,750 Interest Inoome 7,049 8,3n 4,300 3,010 2.700 Miscellaneous 72,902 42,862 56,030 28,975 63,745 Other Internal Revenue 21.nO 23.948 25,146 25,146 26,400 Other Financing Uses 585 81.000 31.429 115.241 9,783 Total General Fund 1,713.922 1 ,sse,716 1,855,688 1.888,8ao 1.878.573 SPECIAL FUNDS Shade Tree Disease Control 7,100 11,134 7,765 16,096 17.437 Community Services Fund 62.457 88,010 86.000 86.000 80.000 Program Fund 94,056 96,989 119,899 145,487 126.512 Park Fund 57.096 115.113 73.400 81.936 72,320 Cable TV Fund 25,806 30._ 33.100 31.180 32.350 Lexington Avenue 90-1 233.788 12.298 4,800 3,600 2.900 Capital Equipment # 1 104,901 1.323 0 0 0 Total Special Funds 585,204 355.527 324.964 364.299 331.519 DEBT SERVICES FUNDS Aerial Platform Truck 38,531 78.390 82.928 83,400 85.271 Advanced Refunding Bonds 232.340 217.795 178,733 144,791 133.300 Certificate of Indebtedness # 1 25.801 26.309 26.218 26,500 27,242 Total Debt Service Funds 296,672 322.494 287,879 254,'691 245,813 CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS Municipal Land and Buildings Fund 63.111 18,329 10.400 10,400 29,600 Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund n3.834 716.832 479.002 541.867 380,058 Development/Redevelopment Fund 25.507 60,598 27,200 23.800 27,600 Total Capital Project Funds 862,452 795,757 518.602 576.087 437,258 e ENTERPRISE FUNDS Water Utility 589,875 603.683 638,555 701,550 842,175 Sanitary Sewer Utility 618.205 642,980 629.950 730.515 946.350 Recycling 0 0 78,354 78,920 78,349 Total Enterprise Funds 1,208.080 1,246.663 1.346,859 1,510,985 1,866.874 GRAND TOTAL 4.666,330 4.610,157 4,331.992 4.594,922 4.760,037 e . . C'TY OF ARDEN H'LLS SUMMARY COMPAR1S'ON OF REVENUE BY OBJECT CODE PROPOSED 1993 BUDGET REV 09099 REVENUES BY OBJECT CODE !llllljlllllll:!11~111;!il!~al~!II!lllji.lllll~w.I!1 31010 GENERAL TAX LEVY 1,337,080 1.343.489 1.499.678 1,372,333 1.359,828 .31020 Delinquent Property Taxe. 20.410 10.328 35.100 (18.200) 5,000 31030 Mobile Homes 8,661 3,639 5,200 3,600 3,600 31040 Fiscal Disparities 0 103.019 0 117.090 120,431 31050 Tax Increments 12,817 26,358 27,000 21,900 26,000 31900 Penalties & Interest 2.392 15,801 9,500 6,800 5,500 32110 liquor. On Sale & Sunday 28,650 35,007 30.000 24,300 31,800 32111 Liquor, Off Sale 450 0 450 0 450 32180 Contractors 3.996 3,510 0 3,300 3,400 32180 Business Places 10,728 5,980 7,800 6.000 6,150 32210 Building & Sign Permits 62.748 91,489 61.450 110,000 80,000 32220 Heating Permits 9.532 7.823 8,500 8,000 8,000 32225 Storm Sewer Permits 15 0 15 0 0 32230 Plumbing Permits 2.650 2.520 2,500 2,700 2,850 32240 Dog Registration 1,433 1,889 1,516 1.400 200 32280 Electrial Permits 9,571 12,792 11 ,000 12,000 12.350 32270 ~ermit Fees (Water) 735 1,100 830 1,150 1,200 32280 Permit Fees (Sewer) 225 946 250 370 400 33401 Local Government Aid 0 0 0 0 0 33402 HSTO & Ag Credit Aid (HACA) 0 0 0 14,118 79,149 33403 MFS Home HACA 0 5,080 0 4,550 4,400 33418 MSA-Construction 329,245 203,047 32,888 66,194 0 33419 MSA-Maintenance 131,310 9.042 4.nO 4,no 4,770 33420 Fireman's Relief 105,678 108,106 108,000 108.000 111,000 33424 Agricultural Credit 0 0 0 0 0 33610 County Aid-Streets 5.047 4,967 5,000 5,000 5,000 33611 Aggregate Tax Distribution 278 208 400 230 230 33612 Arsenal Revenue 100.000 0 0 0 0 33820 County Aid-Recycling 28,871 43,100 18.920 18,920 19,449 e 34100 General Government Fee. 3,746 3.980 4,000 2,500 4,000 34103 Plat Fees & Other Permits 11.836 9,991 19,800 5,000 5,500 34109 Apportionment Of Assessments 700 0 700 0 0 34110 Landscape Inspection (1,065) 0 900 0 0 34111 Rent Cellular 1 6.600 6.600 7.200 7,200 7,200 34202 False Alarms 0 1,000 2,700 950 1.000 34206 Dog Impound Fees 304 198 100 100 100 34222 Delinquent False Alarms 0 162 0 0 0 34408 Reimb of Diseased Tree Removal 819 6,n9 6,500 6.000 5.650 34409 Weed Removal Reimbursement 0 248 500 250 250 34730 Summer ~Iayground Fees 2,962 3,100 2,000 3.500 3,SOO 34740 Summer Trip Fees 0 0 1,300 1,650 1.700 34780 F'ark Use Fees 59.985 77.593 0 0 0 34781 Adult Programs 0 225 38,120 37,325 38,525 34782 Youth Programs 0 0 26,500 33,165 35,555 34790 After School Programs 0 0 4,970 5.650 6,150 34791 Special Event Programs 0 0 3,000 2,550 2,500 e CITY OF ARDEN HilLS . . SUMMARY COMPAR'SION OF REVENUE BY OBJECT CODE PROPOSED 1993 BUDGET REV090992 REVENUES BY OBJECT CODE 35101 Court Fines 28,543 29.541 26,000 25,000 25,750 . 38100 Special Assessments 355,512 391.914 336.724 380.092 304,390 38201 Sales Tax Collected (3.282) 84 0 95 100 36202 State Bldg Code Surcharges 3.356 a,371 130 4,455 4.700 36203 City Bldg Code Surcharges 0 0 1,500 425 445 36210 Interest Income 301.863 319,211 287,175 210,010 169,820 36230 Contributions 108,.230 137.778 128,785 136,515 133.500 36232 Park Dedication Fees 0 50,073 23,300 23,300 23,300 36260 Group Insurance Reimbursement 10,960 1.2,193 13.325 13.322 12,947 36270 Miscellaneous Reimbursements 67.420 81,552 5,000 4,596 0 36275 Reimb State-Plan Review 0 0 0 0 0 36280 Fire Department Reimbursements 53,590 0 0 0 0 36990 Sale of Equipment 6,620 9..223 40,200 15,000 50,000 37100 Current Billings 570,893 583.B86 683.734 745.000 878,580 37170 Hydrant Rental 125 (16) 125 100 100 37180 Meter DepositB 2.415 2,620 2,500 2,500 2.600 37190 Water Meter Upgrade $vs Chg 0 0 0 190 950 37195 MOH Water Test Fee Receipts 0 0 0 6,230 12,460 . 37200 Current Charges 545.784 542,616 563,000 685,000 900,000 37270 MWCC Strength Charges 0 0 0 0 0 37271 SAC charges 13.200 39,S13 23,000 24,000 25,000 38400 Building Rent 21,nO 23,948 25,146 25,146 26,400 39101 Operating Transfer from 101 0 0 0 6,763 8.372 39201 Operating Transfer from 101 26.185 34.318 0 19,016 0 39203 Operating Transfer from 225 0 81,000 86,000 86,000 SO,OOO 39207 Operating Transfer from 602 565 0 468 468 468 e 39218 Operating Transfer from 501 163,215 0 0 83,812 0 39229 Operating Transfer from 601 86.938 70,263 70,505 70,600 70,650 39230 Operating Transfer from 410 0 0 0 0 0 39231 Operating Transf.er from 320 0 44,673 26,218 26,922 26,668 2,367.922 2,461,061 2,342.835 2,594.557 2.757.200 GRAND TOTAL 4,666,$30 4,610,157 4,331,992 4,594,922 4,760,037 . e - ,~ .. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS SUMMARY OF CAMPARISON OF EXPENDITURES WITH EXPENDITURES OF PRIOR YEARS 'i';II~II_!lill~ '1!!I!i!III_III\II~III!lll'~"llllill\;\il_I~II!lll! lil~!lllli~ . GENERAL FUND Mayor & Council 39550 45756 42873 64046 56600 Municipal Court 40106 44039 36200 38200 40100 Elections 6620 149 11215 11345 200 Administrative Office 243068 284503 252472 259520 263230 Legal 15148 17537 20350 21770 37750 Planning & Zoning 24444 49894 30935 49700 31930 Government Bldgs, 44197 45328 48704 55050 44860 Human Rights 9148 170 200 175 200 Police & Animal Control 396428 452078 478507 434930 473340 Fire 311818 295236 291650 285700 296475 Protective Inspections 53532 53575 48822 57455 50355 Public Works, Streets 247538 328016 315064 364880 314685 P,W., Storm Sewers 17261 14795 18232 26945 23775 Public Works, Recycling 50835 56168 0 0 0 Summer Playground Prog, 8832 10267 12768 12519 1 2832 Skating Rinks 30931 44981 42627 38808 41525 Park Maintenance 122910 169857 173822 173102 182260 Operating Trans, to 224 0 0 0 6763 8372 Operating Trans. to 226 26185 17188 0 19016 0 Operating Trans. to 408 0 17130 0 0 0 TOTAL 1688553 1946667 1824441 1919924 1878489 SPECIAL FUNDS e Shade Tree Disease Cont. 12016 18761 16029 17760 15480 Community Services Fund 60815 81000 86000 86000 80000 Program Fund 92921 114295 119899 122009 128028 Park Fund 52884 95865 58846 57425 62545 Cable TV Fund 11143 18392 17850 17432 17200 Lexington Avenue 90-1 127455 0 0 36717 0 Capital Equipment # 1 88370 17854 0 422 0 TOTAL 445602 346167 298624 337765 303253 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS Aerial Platform Truck 82678 81213 82028 82028 82460 Advance Ref. Bonds 01'85 331580 269570 189945 464945 0 Cert. of Indebted. # 1 600 26819 26218 26500 26668 TOTAL 414858 377602 298191 573473 109128 CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS Municipal Land & Bldgs, Fund 2798 0 10400 25000 15000 Permanent Improve, Rev. Fund 168696 243423 385400 516812 125000 Development/Redevelopment 180755 2868 7100 3300 6500 TOTAL 352249 246291 402900 545112 146500 ENTERPRISE FUNDS Water Utility 645708 665077 748690 750813 800605 Sanitary Sewer Utility 677810 788160 870528 867015 919162 Recycling 0 0 77656 71675 74710 e TOTAL 1323518 1453237 1696874 1689503 1794477 TOTAL ALL FUNDS 4,224,780 4,369,964 4,521,030 5,065,777 4,231,847 ------ , '. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS PAGE 1 OF 3 ,SUMMARY COMPARISON OF EXPENDITURES BY OBJECT CODE PROPOSED 1993 BUDGET REV 091092 Expenditures by Object Code '1Ii;liIIIIIIIII;IIIIIf:mIBIIIIIIIII:II:;ill"l~I;II:I;IIII:II:IIIIIII\!IIIIII,~I~~~lllli . 102 Overtime Salaries 6,987 12,453 11,087 10,525 10,795 103 CSO Saleries 7,777 7,667 7,500 7,280 0 104 Temp. Employees Salaries 11,367 18,521 34,728 53,238 52,045 106 Council Salaries 12,100 11,813 12,100 12,100 16,320 107 Admn Office Salaries 159,126 201,973 222,798 201,560 229,119 108 Public Works Salaries 215,949 219,945 222,258 220,045 227,400 109 Park Salaries 143,628 162,781 157,077 151,245 157,484 120 PERAlFICAlMEDI 63.018 73,661 77 ,880 76,000 81 ,040 124 Fireman's Benefit Ass'n 105,678 108,106 108,000 108,000 111 ,000 130 Employer Paid Health Ins. 36,258 38,167 45,841 44,733 48,445 142 Unemployment Camp 348 1,114 0 5,000 0 200 Office Supplies, Postage 13,867 14,786 18,569 18,110 17,625 201 Arts & Crafts Supplies 0 0 1,000 950 1,000 207 Travel, Conf, Schools 10,278 11,770 13,350 6,795 10,925 208 Adult Sports Equipment 0 0 4,500 5,000 5,000 209 Youth Sports Equipment 0 0 4,200 4,175 4,175 212 Gas & Oil 8,840 11,796 1 0,400 11,800 12,900 215 Shop Tools & Supplies 10,260 7,397 13,000 8,950 9,000 217 Mise, Operating Supplies 5,699 4,462 0 59 0 218 Sports Equipment 7,470 7,489 0 0 0 221 Equipment Main!. & Repairs 16,646 23,071 20,100 28,435 21 ,575 I 223 Bldg & Ground Main!. 5,442 5,404 6,500 6,500 7,000 224 Sand, Salt, Road Mix 14,427 15,414 14,000 14,000 15,000 225 Landscaping 68 416 1,100 1,910 2,200 226 Street Signs 2,375 1,560 3,000 2,000 2,500 227 Utility Maintenance 18,590 14,127 29,000 17,500 23,500 228 Main!. Parks & Playgrounds 9,678 15,526 10,500 11,265 11,950 229 Safety Equipment 9,505 3,420 11;000 7,950 7,250 259 Summer Playground Trips 1,217 910 3,400 2,900 3,050 260 Diseased Tree, Private 5.342 9,577 6,500 9,000 6,000 300 Bldg. Insp. & Mileage 25,191 26,509 22,994 34,000 28,000 301 Accounting & Audit Fees 9,098 9,436 8,400 22,560 7,995 302 Electrical Inspections 10,505 8,908 9,400 9,600 9,880 303 Engineer Fees 74,291 97,937 109,500 105,250 87,700 304 Legal Fees 58,102 70,780 59,900 68,420 66,500 305 Plbg. & Well Inspections 3,904 1,674 1,950 1,830 1,900 306 Heating Inspections 7,413 6,322 9,000 6,400 6,400 307 Landscape Inspections 0 0 1,200 0 0 e ,- i.., . CITY OF ARDEN HILLS PAGE 2 OF 3 . SUMMARY COMPARISON OF EXPENDITURES BY OBJECT CODE PROPOSED 1993 BUDGET REV 091092 Expenditures by Object Code l!lllllallllll;III'I;IIBlllllcl;llill;ll'illlllll;'I'illIBIl-il'llllllliIEII'1 . 308 Instructor's Fees 39,971 37,236 22,000 22,000 22,000 309 Computer Service 9,556 13,868 14,320 16,300 9,620 310 Adaptive Rec. Program 1,578 895 1,000 1,537 1,000 311 Fiscal Consultant 1,648 1,847 3,000 2,000 2,000 312 Planning Consultant 37,704 49,811 41,500 49.600 33,500 313 Ramsey Co. Sheriff 382,343 437,202 464,629 422,460 468,465 314 Fire Protection Contract 204,937 186,624 183,000 177,300 185,000 315 Dog Ordinance 1.307 939 1,250 1,070 3,400 316 Fire Inspections 350 200 350 200 200 317 Architects Fees 0 0 0 25,000 14,000 317 Rendering Plant Insp. 2,207 4,336 0 0 0 318 Utility Inspectors 962 1,353 1,500 1,650 1,750 319 Management Fees 7,274 8,343 3,000 17,000 3,000 320 Storm Sewer Inspections 36 0 50 0 0 321 Telephones 10,852 10,568 11 ,565 11,450 12,015 325 Newsletter & Prog. Insert 6,041 5,295 13,044 22,735 22,400 326 Public Education Programs 50 50 100 75 100 331 Mileage Reimbursement 81 133 175 170 175 343 Flyers & Info Materials 2.839 2,840 3,200 2,300 800 344 After School Programs 0 0 500 450 450 345 Special Events Programs 0 0 1,600 1,500 1,500 351 Printing & Publishing 1,620 5,428 2,500 1,000 2,500 I 354 Ballots 321 0 765 765 0 352 Recording Secretary 0 0 0 2,280 2,880 355 Ordinance Codification 830 0 0 0 15,000 360 Bonds & Insurance 79,238 83,457 86,100 95,700 103,900 362 Judgmts & Losses/Prop, 0 1,804 1,500 1,500 1,500 363 Judgmts & Losses/Auto. 0 3,007 2,500 2,000 2,000 381 Electric Utilities 46,941 45,616 48,225 45,225 49,550 382 Water Supply Roseville 344,649 370,558 410,000 410,000 430,000 383 Fuel 3,558 5,572 8,100 5,000 7,000 384 Waste Recycling 50,756 56,132 63,661 58,000 60,335 385 Metro Waste Control Chgs, 385,813 449,004 518,000 517,704 546,012 386 MWCC Strength Charges 0 0 0 0 0 387 MDH Water Test Exp. 0 0 0 6,230 12,460 388 Electricity-Semaphores 3,955 5,910 6,000 5,500 6,000 389 Residential Clean-Up 0 0 5,050 4,000 4,400 390 Gopher State 191 776 500 900 950 e ~ , CITY OF ARDEN HILLS PAGE 3 OF 3 , ' SUMMARY COMPARISON OF EXPENDITURES BY OBJECT CODE PROPOSED 1993 BUDGET REV 091092 Expenditures by Object Code iliiill_lliiii'III!lIIIBiiiliil:liIJl"l~lilllliiliiBli'iiiiliilill~llI! . 404 Office Equipment Maint. 2,605 2,919 3,800 3,000 800 406 Street Sweeping 0 0 0 0 0 407 Diseased Tree, Public 449 2,946 2,000 2,000 2,000 408 Pavement Management Plan 85,941 168,657 130,000 197,500 105,000 409 Civil Defense Siren Maint. 0 3,369 2,000 450 500 412 Building Coordinator Cost 5,471 9,220 0 0 0 415 Equipment Rent 712 1,739 2,000 1,500 2,000 417 Uniforms 2,402 2,281 2,296 2,220 2,155 418 Rental, Facilities & Equip 40 40 11 ,400 9,180 8,500 420 Depreciation Expense 135,274 143,327 143,082 151,000 172,000 433 Dues & Subscriptions 24,772 19,193 21,193 19,294 20,090 437 Misc. Expenses 18,032 10,329 4,080 25,947 5,600 438 Employee Paid Health ins. 10,943 13,162 18,865 15,003 18,092 439 Sales Tax 6,719 8,687 9,100 9,110 12,110 440 Bldg. Code Surcharges 3,033 4,917 2,500 4,400 3,200 441 Refunds & Reimbursements 18,128 3,748 0 0 0 442 SAC Reimbursements 13,043 38,610 20,000 20,000 23,000 443 Reimb. State-Plan Review 0 0 0 0 0 444 City Gardens 0 854 1,000 0 0 445 Bank Charges 0 4,917 1,200 6,785 2,600 446 Weed Control/Removal 0 411 500 250 500 510 Land 0 0 0 0 0 e 520 Buildings 594 1,137 2,500 2,500 3,000 525 Lift Stations 0 0 0 0 0 530 Contractor 286,588 248,647 364,923 419,182 121,680 550 Machinery & Automobile 101,570 29,194 57,375 46,375 50,335 570 Office Furniture & Equip 8,419 9,690 10,965 13,980 13,000 580 Misc. Equipment 3,334 23,289 19,525 24,715 42,600 601 Principal 335,000 292,500 232,500 507,500 77,500 611 Interest 79,258 58,283 39,473 39,473 4,960 720 Operating Transfer to 101 21,770 122,802 56,575 140,809 35,715 721 Operating Transfer to 226 26,185 17,188 44,639 63,655 41,085 727 Operating Transfer to 520 66,296 0 0 0 0 731 Operating Transfer to 501 86,938 97,082 96,723 97,100 97,318 737 Operating Transfer to 408 60,815 17,130 10,400 1 0,400 29,600 741 Operating Transfer to 522 0 0 0 0 0 742 Operating Transfer to 410 102,400 0 0 0 0 744 Operating Transfer to 224 0 0 0 6,763 8,372 GRAND TOTAL 4,224,780 4,369,964 4,521,030 5,065,777 4,231,847 e ---- CITY OF ARDEN HILLS . MBDU\ND\JM Dl\TE: September 10, 1992 TO: Mayor and city ~il f!f Dorothy Person, Clerk J,lnm;n;"trator FIlCH: catherine J. Iago, Deputy Clerk/zoning 1ldministrator ef/ SUBJEX:T: Proclamation - u.s. Amy ReserVe oay-9/27/92 In conjunction with their Open House and Dedication Ceremony, the u.s. Anny Reserve has requested Council adopt the attached Proclamation. ACrION REOUIRED: If Carmeil concurs, they should pass a motion adopt::in:J the Proclamation Declaring September 27, 1992, U.S. Anny Reserve Day. CJI/ts Attachment . . PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, the Army Reserve have protected this nation's freedom for over 75 years. WHEREAS, hundreds of Residents of Arden Hills are veterans of wars which have protected our freedom. WHEREAS, the newly built Army ReserVe Center is being dedicated as the Arden Hills U.S. Army Reserve Center. WHEREAS, the Army Reserves is building community relations by sharing its facility and resources with the City of Arden Hills. NOW, THEREFORE, I, THOMAS R. SATHER, MAYOR OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA, do hereby proclaim the 27th day of September, 1992, as U.S. Army Reserve Day in the City of Arden Hills, and 1 commend this observance to the people of this area. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS THIS 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1992. TI-IOMAS R. SATIIER, MAYOR ATTEST: DOROTIIY A. PERSON, CLERK ADMINISTRATOR il'" , . CITY OF ARDEN HILLS MEMCIU\NOOM DATE: sept-h<>..r 9, 1992 '1'0: Mayor, city Council, and Dorothy PerSOn, Clerk 1ldmi.ni.strator :FRCI{: Dan Winkel, Public WOrks SUperintendent D\V stJBJJOC:T : Accepting and 1IpproVing contract for Inspection of the city water Tower Located on Fernwood Avenue Attache:i is a proposal fram A.E.C. Engineering for inspection of the City water tower on Fernwood Avenue. As you know, the city has an existing interior rust problem on this tower that may soon need repair. Pat Arlig fram M.S.A. has discussed this issue with various en:rineering finns which perfonn this type of inspection. Her recanunendation is that A.E.C. is qualifie:i to perfonn this type of inspection and that the quote receive:i fram A.E.C. is very reasonable. Council authorization for A.E.C. to do this inspection is require:i. At a previous meeting, the Council authorize:i $3,000 to have this analysis done this fall. '!he . inspection quote fram A.E.C. is for $2,000 with an $850 charge per day after the first day. It should be noted that all parties involved indicate that this inspection can be completed in one day. REXX:MmIDATION: I am requesting Council authorization for the inspection to be done by A.E.C., as soon as it can be sc:hedule:i. CDUNCIL AcrION: '!he Council should authorize the Mayor and/or staff to sign the proposed contract with A.E.C. Engineering f= the inspection of the water tower located on Fernwood Avenue and authorize the expenditure of $2,000. LM:rk . .- . . . AEC ENGINEERING ENGINEERS INSPECTORS 511 Eleventh Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415 Phone: 16121332-8905 r,::---.---....'.. ~ rn ~ II: II ~\:'i ,: Fax: (612) 334..3101 D '''\.27'''''''1 r--~~. .,,, August 17, 1992 'Ij! I~ L'H '~--j~i Ms. Patricia A Arlig, P.E. L- --_..J MSA 9800 Shelard Parkway, Suite 102 Minneapolis, MN 55441 Re: Proposal to Inspect a 500 MG Hydropillar City of Arden Hills, Minnesota AEC Proposal #MN062992 Dear Ms. Arlig: We are pleased to submit this proposal to inspect the 500 M G Hydropillar for the City of Arden Hills. Minnesota in the Fall 1992. The inspection will be performed in conformance with the applicable sections of the enclosed . Procedures For Insoectina Existina Steel Water Storaae Tanks. Please note that the owner is to provide an operator to control the flow rate from the reservoir. This person must be at the control station full time while our inspectors are inside the reservoir. This is a safety precaution so that in an emergency, the flow from the reservoir can be stopped immediately. The interior will be examined by one or two individuals floating in a raft while the reservoir is being emptied. This evaluation can only be performed if the temperatures are above freezing and there is no ice in the reservoir. The exterior will be examined in areas accessible without any rigging or scaffolding. Paint chips from the exterior coating will be analyzed for total lead content. Based on the results, we may recommend a TCLP Test be performed on a sand blasted sample to determine if removal of the exterior coating will generate hazardous waste. Following the inspection, we will submit an Inspection Report, certified by a professional engineer. The report will include color photographs of the conditions discovered during the inspection, engineering analysis, and cost estimates of any reconditioning work required. The report will also include necessary repair procedures for an existing leak, Two copies of the report will be provided. The reservoir inspection will be done for a fixed fee of $2.000.00, including the certified Inspection Report and initial paint chip test for lead. If the inspection cannot be completed in one day, each additional day will be charged at $850.00. The inspection fee does not include the cost of the TCLP Test. AEC provides this service and a cost estimate will furnished upon request. . . . . Ms. Patricia A. Arlig, P.E. MSA August 17, 1992 Page 2 of 2 This proposal is valid for 90 days. ,If you find our proposal acceptable, please sign and return this letter. We can schedule the inspection upon receipt of this document. Sincerely, RING Accepted this_ day of ,1992 City of Arden Hills, Minnesota By Officer Enclosures: Procedures for Inspection of Existing Steel Water Tanks Company Brochure . Project References . \ ----..--------- ~f ;.. ,~ . CITY OF ARDEN JIILIS ~ DATE: sept~~r 14, 1992 'XU: Mayor and City council FRCI!: Dorothy A. Person, Clerk J\dm;n; strater J) f SUBJECT: Clerk 1ldministrater Job Description Attached is a Resolution for the Clerk Administrator responsibilities. Options for the City Council include: 1. Review at the September 14 meeting with adoption at the September 28 meeting. 2. Adoption at the September 14 meeting. DAP Its Attachments . . '" . " . CITY OF ARDEN HILLS STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 12....' 6' A RESOLUTION DESCRIBING THE SCOPE OF AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE ARDEN HILLS CITY ADMINISTRATOR. WHEREAS, the City of Arden Hills is organized as an Optional Plan A City pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 412; and WHEREAS, the Arden Hills City Council has created the position of City Administrator; WHEREAS, the Arden Hills City Council wishes to more clearly define the scope of authority and responsibilities which will be assigned to the City Administrator; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: A. Chief Administrative Responsibility. The City Administrator shall supervise all Administrative Staff and be directly accountable to the City Council. B. Specific Duties. The City Administrator shall: . l. Prepare agenda for Council meetings; ensure Council reports are informative and accurate; attend City Council meetings; maintain City's official records; and make policy recommendations. a. Attend all scheduled or special Council meetings to obtain Council direction and present and interpret results being achieved by departments. b. Compile, coordinate and distribute agenda materials so that reports can be studied by Council members prior to meeting discussion and presentation and makes policy recommendations. c. Ensure that City records are kept and maintained such as Council minute books, ordinance books and finance reports. d. Perform or delegate all duties required of a City Clerk to ensure compliance with Statutes and the Plan A form of City government. 2. Administer the City's personnel program which includes: compensation plan, labor negotiations, personnel POlicies/ordinance, recruitment/selection; . grievance/progressive discipline and employee development program. ~ ~',. ','<. - . a. Establish and maintain an effective compensation plan; and administer the City's benefit program. b. With Council approval, plan, coordinate, develop and direct personnel programs and policies which will result in the effective and efficient utilization of all employees. c. Represent City Council in the negotiation of the union contracts and in grievance matters resulting from interpretation of the union contracts and the City's personnel ordinance. d. Maintain a personnel system which includes files, performance appraisals and records of accomplishments or disciplinary actions. e. Recruit and select employees as needed by the organization consistent with state and federal affirmative action and equal employment opportunity laws. 3. Act as City's chief financial officer by preparing and submitting annual budget for Council approval; oversee City's investment program; ensure proper accounting procedures and record keeping; and develop capital . improvement plan. a. Develop the annual budget for presentation in appropriate form for review and consideration by the City Council. b. Oversee administration and control of all financial matters. c. Submit an annual audi t report and capital improvement plan for Council approval. d. Ensure that proper control reports are developed and used and supervise effective operation of purchasing. e. Ensure effective investment of available funds and proper accounting practices to control financial assets; and provide for financial planning. 4. Direct and coordinate administrative and operational functions of the City to ensure that all departments are providing efficient and effective service. a. Evaluate, on a continuing basis, the organization, administration and services being rendered by the . various departments of City government to determine whether results are being achieved. , . b. Make or recommend organizational changes in . staffing, as well as other changes in administration as may be justified to assure that a high standard of performance is maintained. c. Remain informed on all aspects of municipal government; and research improved methods of administration for possible implementation in Arden Hills. d. Direct the affairs of the City in conformance with federal, state and City laws. e. Work with City Council and department heads in establishing goals and objectives designed to achieve and maintain the desired level of service for community residents. 5. Keep the Council informed on an on-going basis of City issues and concerns; and inform the Council about regional, state and national concerns that impact the City. a. Represent the City Council and/or maintain liaison in metropolitan and state government-related activities; and represent the City Council at . public meetings outside the community. b. Inform the City Council on all important developments which may affect the administration of City government and which will allow Council members to perform effectively. c. Serve as the City's public information representative; confers with media; and speak at schoOls, civic, and other organizational events. 6. Shall perform such other duties as are assigned by the Ci ty Council. Approved by the City Council on the day of , 1992. MAYOR: Thomas Sather ATTEST: Dorothy Person, City Administrator b/city/adminres.ahl . 9/14/92 ~ .... ,. '" ~. .... ~~..' . .... ..... .... ........ ' . .' '. .' , ........,.. " '- .-,-'~. I f ~:-~. .-,'".,'.- ': n. ~ ,. ','-' J, " . , ,v", I '. S , i,Co=~I'IIJrm, GiJOd;, ...~.S . ,~. . ~".:-~ .,~_ ~.~.f8"I;,. -,t) .;p"",~ >'$!' ""'V~' - ~, . l! ..... ." ; '" . "i>'" PLANNNG .. '. AlJIMiJlI . CITY : OF. ARDEN,i'tIlIl.I.Sf'{} ,. . r_: Septeml;!8r 2,1~2' .\: , _._-~_._.----- oJ ._---~- .~2~ AGENDA . REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CITY OF ARDEN HILLS WEDNESDAY September 2, 1992 , 7:30 p.m. CITY HALL 1. Call to Order and Roll Call. 2. Approval of Minutes of August 5, 1992 Planning Commission Meeting. 3 . Case No. 92-16. Site Plan Review for proposed bank at 1160 West County Road E (old Hoigaard building), Joe Commers - Owner. 4. Discussion of other planning related issues: a. Proposed development of Bethel College site west of Snelling, proposed by Good Value Homes. 5 . Adjournment. ***************************************************************** . PLEASE CALL THE CITY OFFICE IF YOU &~E UNABLE TO ATTEND THE MEETING 633-5676 ***************************************************************** . . . - ,.- -..- ......Il4IiM LANDSCAPE 3llfi_~~' _eMIR AROlIfECfS ","{_~_,'~;~)_ . . . ,_C,; ,.' $lIint PIolIl"~ItIIlIll6'.101 1l8llMlM AND 6U:~M"IO' U.IHY PI.AtltIEnS F8l<. 61~~7>' ." fi:~~ f~Nq J4EMO -'-'.; ;;. 'l'Ol AlIJ)BN a.z.s l'LlWIfINQ ~q:l:OJI/ PiUlM l SJ\~.'fI.I\l::Dl\ ~ ....y, INC. J_ ~ - PI.AI;ImQ @N$tlL'l'AN'l' stlBJBC'l'l CAn 192-15 Site nan aevi'_ for BaDJt~iQg P'omer HOigum building 'OI1..'Co1:lnty liload If APPL:l:CAN'l'l JQfleph ~s. ClIlmer ot.lNi],<tiJ1Q" DA'l'lh ~ember2, 1992 ';', " RBOtlJdl'1' Last month thill!' it_ wu Fe_'fldl:o ~. Pl~ng CQlmDiN1CJn. ina pr~l.~~"; coneept fo:ntl to determine PllUmi1'l4J'~i..ion r&lllpC$lS.~ dte i~'~~II" . Plan approval is requirfld :bI1ICIluse c:Mn~ will be ma&I ..., '~ibuil~.;lIi" and acee.. frOlll a puj:llic street. '::x ''- ~ '~;'" ~ .t.... . ,'.. 1. )'CeRSSz . '," .....". A. PAllont acces.: OM 30 foot drivawaynsar the center of the. county Road Efrontage, generally ace"..,...,.t~ :L wid.,l~...,,~' ,'..1 1 wide lane out. ". ,.f'-, B. Preliminary Plcln. Ace... via II n_driv~near the w.at... preperty lin.; egr."s via the eJtisting drive. . ",;,' .j'. c. current Plan: . Present: 2-way driveoontinuing as it 8Jl:t*tif,aa' additional 1 ],aae aceellsdrive nsar the: west p~'l~i'. . primarily tor drive-in :barlking~n~. . Don Sol_ Oftbt'R8N~ CQ\IntyHighWGf ~t favors thelet..t option. '. A' 2. BUILDING: ,.. PreliminauP1ari showed west 16 of builtlling r_ftdan4:l".~~ .... with 4 driv.-l,lp lanes w!.eh on. ,~6ti,tio~l' lalHl _st of tl.'l"~'.jl!It building but; infringing OI1th. rlllqllire<lS foot ,lIl1d~ '~ strip. . . .';L ., ."" ' , B. Revised plan retains exi..t1Qg1"oof ot W'Ft16 of buU4iZ1lJ'~~si " all 5 drive-l,lp lane. i.\n41lr ~.~f. Not l:l<llly d_~.~t~t. the drive s.tbae!t pro"Um bUti~~ ~IIC! 2:eta1hsthe "i '.' I ~r ex1a:tingIN11dil:lg'. Co1U1llUl wi:l.l repla'$l th$,wut wall',' ./ ._.!t. north an4. south wansr_ved up toth\t"''El4lV.l1ne.;",.;.:.~'' c. The buU,dlng ta.aa.4e will f...~. a._MilJO type of. ~.. . '.c. ontranC$~' the-Hr. Movt.. ,f~.lIftIf.tlh. ta})leel!d ..... c' dr1ve-up'lanu w!.1l ba red_*,iD"_t(:h-th.'propose4~ . ...' , " . . . , . ,'., , , :"""':'.': ',,' >'-', ,,'- -, - ' , ,""\,,~:':\'--~-"<'::- Theattaoh..s nOrth .l.......tlon drawi!llri' ~.tbe ~kporll f'J'~,~<, doe. not .hOW'~ .:l~oneh$Jllf"',fW' Mr. ,~ Ol;..-:,,_W'-tiIp portion of tllebUil4ing: . . ..., '" ,,; ....., . '-y~ .....c.. ".""," Planning Memo - Arden Hills Case #92-16 . September 2, 1992 Page 2 of 3 3. PARKING: A. Parking demand is assumed by the Owner to be less than the total required for each use, due to the different peak periods of use for the two businesses. I denlt believe that Mr. Movies would require the one space for each 150 sq. ft. of floor area specified for general retail uses. Banks have the sarne requirement as "Business and Professional Offices' - 1 space for each 250 sq, ft. and used for both the Norwest and Roseville Bank Sites. If these requirements were used we would need: Mr. Movies @ 1/150 sq. ft. = 33 spaces Bank @ 1/250 sq. ft. = 17 soaces 50 spaces total The franchisor, Mr. Movies, Inc. (Dave Kaiser) , indicates that their similar video stores have a peak of about 20 visitor and 3 employee cars at one time, usually Friday and Saturday at 7:00 p.m. This amounts to 1 space for each 220 sq. ft. of floor area. B. The plan shows a total of 38 spaces. However, the parking north of the building is all calculated using 8 foot wide stalls - 9 . feet is required. Adjustments can be made so that only 1 or 2 spaces would be lost (see attached plan option). C. Employee parking is appropriately provided on the SE corner of the building - the farthest parking from the building entrances and least directly accessible. 4- STACKING SPACE IN DRIVE-UP LANES A. Normally 6 spaces are adequate. The plan show 5, 5, 6, 6, and 7 for each lane starting closest to building. Norwest, for comparison has approximately 3, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 stacking spaces allowing room for arriving cars to gain access to any lane. 5. LANDSCAPING: A. Although 20 new trees and 32 new shrubs are proposed on the plan, we would recommend that some plan changes be made as shown on the attached plan. B. Five foot wide landscape strips are shown around the perimeter of all paved areas and adjacent to the building. The front parking setback exceeds the 20' minimum. 6. TRASH ENCLOSURE: Due to the small amount of trash generated by either use, a small trash enclosure with hand movable containers (residential type) will be used. Pick-up schedule to be arranged not to conflict with business traffic. . Planning Memo - Arden Hills Case #92-16 . September 2, 1992 Page 3 of 3 7. LIGHTING: Double shoe box fixtures on 16 foot poles are proposed at 4 staggered locations between Co, Road E and the building. One light should also be provided for the east parking lot and drive and one or two lower light standards (10 ' - 12') or bollard lighting should be provided at the south end. RECOMMENDATIONS: l. Waive the Moratorium Ordinance. I can find no aspects of the plan that do not conform with both the existing and proposed ordinances, except for the width of parking spaces mentioned previously that will be changed. 2. Determine that the parking requirement for Mr. Movies of 1 space/220 sq.ft. of floor area is adequate and that the total parking requirement of 40 cars can be reduced by 3 spaces due to the different peak hour usage for the 2 businesses. (Available parking may limit the types of uses that will someday replace either of the uses.) 3. Approve the site plan with the following conditions: . A. Approval will allow the Applicant to obtain a building permit to undertake building demolition and site related work. Before the building permit is issued for the facade reconstruction, building elevations must be approved by the Planning Commission, Council and BUilding Inspector. This 2 stage approval process is proposed by the Applicant to allow the site paving to occur before potential frost. B. The landscaping plan is to be revised in accordance with the attached plan and a landscape bond is to be provided to the City before any building permits are issued. C. That one additional light standard be provided on the east side of the building and that bollard lighting or two lower light standards be provided along the south drive. NOTE: The Planning Commission and Council have expressed concern for this type of approach in the past, feeling that we are making commitments on certain components without seeing the real picture of what is exposed to the public. The building appearance was a primary concern expressed by the Planning Commission in last month's review and I have expressed by concern over the building image. The applicant was informed that the 2 stage building permit as proposed is not a customary approach. :dmn . i ....j ........ uu m~m~i o A" "~~" ~ ~ M ~~~<f ..... I- i;iI :':-':-':-':, Vl 0 0 """.- w a:. Vl "''''~ '" , > >-w I~~o'~ 1.1, b . Z inN 0 ~ a3~ ~ o ....... ~ ~';iu II ~ -=::: Z ~ ~~~~S ~ 2'" 0::: ::l "" ,'. ' 0"," ~ W 0::: --~ - > ~ ce- 0::0 .;.;.; I- W N .. 00 0 (i) .. ~ ~ .;i c::( '" 2: <t U Vl ~n g ::; I g_", g I W ::l I- -I <0<'1' r.ti > S~j~~ -- co 0 d ...J N..... '<l' (5 ..:;.."''5' a. :2: en - .UJ ~3~g~ W Z Vl w :c ~ ..,,- ~ .... <t ,.. Z W fu Z $ Z 'il' ~ ~ .,.., L- <Il ~ wow I ! ~I " ~ r-" Z 0 ,~ 0 ' ,-," ~ 0 _ w _ z:g ~ I- ,"'!;;: <t a:......a:. >2'" ~W ~_""". VIO co c:.('f"'"<C ~ ~ii:~ ~ ~g ~............ .O'.Ot~ .O-.O~ .O",Oll( , jNl"H~~d 10 39Cl, ......, ..... . , '$ " , . ' I J . ~ ~'l ~ +- -+ ~ , , < i N, /' '" , : ,: ~I 0 , f I S i'" '" ....... ' ';;: ~~ ~. - --. .'~ ~ ," ~O'f.l: ~"I Q ~~~.. ,-,.- g:~ ~-;;:; ",' OE:l~m=-J ,~ - . .., ' - ~ ~ .. W . <<:ID~c=J , i " ~ o .D',C r . ~ ~ t .. ~ q ~ 0 w ~9~ .O-.H .O-,S.O", g ~ ~~ .. - ~ ~I ~ ij).C1 ~ +- --+- -+ .. 01 I ~ ~ q " r=;t:""""" .c".H 8 9 ---~- --- ~ " . ,~ ! ~ ~ .~o 0 ~~I O"ol[ ~ i:'- <> <Dc' u--l ~ ~ '".. 0 . , 0 IL--J . \l'l , ., ~ : ~ '".. -. is :~ . ~ ~ '~ -+~ o . - -.;-----."T u"u__~-n^ ,,____uu . ~ _ : .. t i:! 11I1'!lNl4d3 'dI'I" U ~ ~tIONl~ll,j 0< IAr: l/, ~., r ! l.o..sl ? .O',U .O"Oll:-o::th~ or' /+- '" . - - ~...... 'J < . . - - / , o I ..r .;.. ," ... ~~ .. "": ~. !N3/"!3^Vdn31,)lH . : I ; .... ...... a w ....... ~ D<( ~ ~ :;'~~2 ~~ <(I- ~~~~~ (/) 00 w ex:(/) i! #~~ ~ I ,11 . :> >-w rID o. ~:;: 9 :i~ ID N 0 112m 1-2 ~ "0111 ~ 0 i! ~ h~ " ~ 22 s: . g:l ~::i;: ~ w:J~ ,- GU~:' ., ~;~~ ~ .. > w . ~ <t'" ex: ex: 0 " >- . ~ <(Uui .. u; i ' 1_~ < -io..J~ ~ .~'; 00 0 ~ u ,,"0 0 w ~ :>" ~ 1'>- ID :JI-...J ,. uiN o:i > ~g:1E D d(/)::! ,:,:;! M N _ "" 5 1;;....-::'" ~! 0.. ~ ;;~ .. w ::t~~,,: ~ 2 (/)w:C: ~. ~ " ~;i::l~~ 5:[ oi! \\: w~ <( 252 :; g " j i! ! iJaID ;; I .'.." :.:: wow ID . " I-w 2 DU)D i ~'": ~ IS :t {g - >- <( ex:...ex: ; ~ ~ ~ ~~ ;;! ~ en <>: : -,~ ~ > z >- ~ ..... m <(...<( i2 II> ~4 0 ........... '* ~ 0 ...11> .$ ~~ >- - " t "" "" I ~~ , II ~ .0-.0" ::J~ I ~"- .(hOt .O".QO( ~3. -::r'" i , '" , , , I .. I , I ..... ..... , I , ..~ , . lr: ~ -" I ;.,~ [C!) ar.ill ~ ;; ~;, ~ ..;- , IJEJ 1t'1{ ::: [[~J ' ~\: , ., , w . OC[] [C!) c::J -, . 'l 0 i 4 .~ 0 .Q'.~L i ~ '" - > ~ i . l . ~9~~ j ,Nl J~..~o', >- -- z ~o ~ :> 0 0 ; ~~ , ~ ~ -> !~ u - ~ I ~, 1S);,s <- ..... , a % --1- OC[] ->~ 31 '>= . . ... ~ ~---- , . . '.J >- l .:> ! ~ . ,... -~ . ! '<z ~ ~ ~~ , , ~ .._n__~'_________ ___...___.___nn_" .--------- , u; ~ . , '" do 1dI'I. , '" ,O'..~ ~ , . . jN~l^,",j,jQ39CI~ . ~ "'" -"> it'" : ~t I ~~ w 0<1: <1:1- 00 CCCl) >-w 1-2 2~ ::>2: . o . UCl) I-...J CI)= w:r: $2 OW (00 ....0:: ....<1: W a a:: <( 0 ::::> c::- d CJ) z w Q . a:: <( '-1 "t- t'..\ ~ '~ ~ f"""" Z ~ 0 ~,,~ ~ > ~ UJ -' . UJ J: ~>~ t- o: 0 z ~....;, - z 0 - . ~ > W ...J W . . _PRlerie, , Hou!ing C~k~t;ng _less. die cast aluminum, Complete siliconegasketing ium bronze, acrylic PO\\'. around lens frame and at mount- der finish. Measures: 16" ing meets U.L. requirements for C square X 6.5" deep, wet location listing, Lens optics , " , The clear. tempered gla,s len, Thisfixture is avaiLable tn neJa- is held securely in a d.ie cast, adjustabl~ Type II or Type III recessed door frame. The lens asymmetric distribution pattern. frame is supplied with mounting In most situations, it is speciiied holes for iield-instalied outdoor in a fixed horizontal position, accessmies, such as the Le~~('l although other mountings are lens Shield or Wire Guard, available, The PR Seri.. is ideally Ple2se refer to page 25 for suited ror roadway applications, details on these accessories. parking area50rbuilding Ballast mounted security lighting, Standard with Internal high power iactorCWA multi.tap ballast !includes 120, 208,240 and 277V). An optional 480 Volt bal. last is also available, The bailast components are preinstalled to reduce installation tin'le, provide cooler operation and longer life, Lamps Accommodates 175,.150.or400 Watt Metal Halide and 100, 150, 250,or400Watt High Pressure sodium mogul base lamps, . Q ~";:.. t Parking and Roadway light Order Information C>Wos Number -"" -- YQkt~t B~",ast/l~P Moonljt' ?R141:'.M PR2417.M Pf\3417-,...t PR4417-f.,<, 1?5WMH PRl42S.M PR4.;25./v'. 250W.v.H PR142S-M PR242:5.,'v\ PR,14~O.M PR2440.M rP.3440.M PR4440.M 400W MH PR4510.M loa\.\: riPS ?R1510.M PRZ510.!\.', PRJ510.M PR4515.M 150\'',1 HP5 PR1S15.,Y, 215.M PR351.~-M PR4S1S.M 2)0\'\' HPS PR1525-M PR2525-M PRJS2S.M PR3540.M PI~AS40.,'1t 400W HPS PR:l$40.t\', PR2540.M Options.: (facION-inSt<l\l~dl change sut(j): "M" tQ "5" ~aov Ballas! Internal ruse .dd suffix "FF" Quart::!: Standb\' ~dd ~I,lffi)l "0" PhOlOCtll iwilr. PR.!,: add suifix ".MP" I.sp(:(:iiv voltAAe) ^'C~~ ifie1d,,('I~Ul\ed) (pictured on p. 251 ll2xan ll?M Shit:~r.I LS,4 \\'ifEGuard FWG.40 Pl'\ot(lC,e1l (INith PR.1. PR2. PR3i PC-4' (~specifv voli"~) . J RUUD lR liGHTING ltlrnp' indud~ with fixture. CONSULTING ENGINEERS . Maier Stewart & Associates Inc. MEMORANDUM TO: MS. CATHERINE IAGO, CITY OF ARDEN HILLS FROM; MARK GRAHAM /tfG'- RE: PLANNING CASE NO. 92-16 RENOVATION OF HOIOGARD'S BUILDING FILE: 520-000-00 DATE: AUGUST 31, 1992 We have reviewed the site plan provided by Mr. Joseph Commers for the above-referenced project and offer the following comments. It appears that storm water runoff will be directed to existing catchbasins in the southeast and southwest comers of the site or to a new catchbasin proposed along the west boundary. This new catchbasin will capture runoff and drain via a small diameter pipe to the existing catchbasin . at the southwest corner. As far as we can determine, the e}(isting storm sewer is not publicly maintained, so the applicant will have to obtain the necessary easements from the owners of the storm sewer. A new, one-way driveway access Jane is proposed near the west property line to serve the site. As County Road E is within Ramsey County's jurisdiction, it will be necessary for the applicant to receive their approval for the access. Customarily. this would involve an access permit for work within County right-of-way. We arc not aware of any changes to existing sanitary sewer or water main utilities which serve the existing structure. We would recommend that Building Inspector Dave Kriesel review further plans submitted by the applicant. Please contact me if you have any questions. MG;lp Im-Ol05 ,I<P . 1959 SLOAN PLAce, surre 200, Sf, PAUL, MINNESOTA 55'17 612.774.6021 9800 SHELARD PARt:YVAY, SUITE 102. MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55441 612.546.0432 . Equal Opportunity Employor ~ . CJ I') {) . 0 '.,< n"" :::.-~ -~~ ~~. ~:} , ..:'" : ~~ t 3t' [),,'" {L ',~ --L tc: ~ ,-, (;) L1 I r- :; me,:. I ~! ''\, ;~ I "" , ,\, , . !~ I , , '~ . . . . cnm ~r- h;m ::~ ~~ 11- ~O ~Z . . -------- . CITY OF ARDEN JIILIS MEKIl1lNOOM DATE: ~ 10, 1992 'XU: Mayor and City council ~ ' \4~ FIlCH: DIm Winkel, Public Works SUperint.......ent -y.\"' stlBJECT: Medical Leave of 1\bsence for Fred Reed I have conferred with Mr. Reed regarding his 90-day ne:lical leave of al:sence which is coming to an errl on September 10. Fred informed me that he sustained an injury the 1st week of AugUst and his d=tor has advised him that his reoJV"ery period will be exterrled another one to two months . Fred is very appreciative of all the tilne Council granted him. With this in mind, Fred is requesting an additional 90 day ne:lical leave of al:sence without pay. I explained to him at this tilne, this would probably be his only option. RE:C:CM[ENDATION: . staff reconunerrls to Council to grant his request of extending his ne:lical leave of al:sence for an additional 90 days =rnmencing September 11, 1992 until December 13, 1992. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council concurs with staff recomrnerrlation, they should grant Mr. Reed a 90 day ne:lical leave of ab;ence commencing September 11, 1992 to December 13, 1992, as requested. OO:rk . . AugUst 26, 1992 Mayor and City council Members: I would like to take this q:p:rrtunity to thank the Council for the 90 day medical leave of absence. '!he leave was for the period of time of June 10 thru Sept. 10. My progress has been much slower than I had anticipated. I sustained another injury in the first week of August. My doctor has irrlicated to me that I will have a setback of another 1 to 2 m:mt:hs. Because of this new development, I am requesting an additional 90-&.y medical leave of absence without pay. Both myself and nrj physician are hopeful that by then I will be able to return to work. once again, both myself and nrj family appreciate the extended time that the council has granted to me, and I am very hopeful that I will be able . to return to work soon. s~ . G' ec~~~ Fred Reed . ~Ift/;J 9/JVI> ~/ .. . . CITY OF ARDEN JIILIS MEXmINDUM D1aE: JUne 4, 1992 'XU: Mayor and City CoImCil FRaI: Dan winkel, Public Works SUperintendent diU SUBJECT: Medical Leave of Absence for Fred Reed I have =nferred with Mr. Reed all options available regarding his status with Arden Hills. Fred is aware of the Council's decision not to extend any additional sick or vacation time. Fred is very appreciative of all the time Council granted him. With this in mind, Fred is requesting a 90 day medical leave of absence without pay. I explained to him at this time, this would probably be his on! y option. RECX:M1ENDATION : . staff recorrnnencls to Council to grant his request of a medical leave of absence for 90 days connneI1Cing June 13, 1992 until September 10, 1992. ACrION RFDUTRFD: If Council =n=s with staff recommendation, they should grant Mr. Reed a 90 day medical leave of absence commencing June 13, 1992 to September 10, 1992, as requested. r:w:rk - . (Ie: ~' . . June 4, 1992 May= and city Council MemJ:ers: I would like to take this opportunity to thank the Council for all of your help and understanding while I have been injured and away from my job. I My prcgress has been much sImler than I had anticipated, and at times, can be very frustrating. I am still hoping and planning to come back to work as soon as possible. Hmlever, at this time, I understand that my sick time and most of my vacation time has been used up by my absence, and I am requesting a 90-<lay medical leave of absence without pay. Both myself and my physician are hopeful that by then I will be able to return to w=k. once again, both myself and my family appreciate the extended time that the Council has granted to me, and I am very hopeful that I will be able to return to w=k soon. . 'i=el?ld~z ' '2P 7- ~. ,; ~\'; ~ '?€.c,~\\~Y;'.J J~) Fred Reed ])p/\.. ( , . .:;i'?,,_:'t-.\ '0 '" "','J; r... J--:'-' . "1- . , . ,~ . ----.- n .. __L...im -,-~----'---- ll.l . CITY OF ARDEN JIILIS ~ DATE: sept~~r 10, 1992 'XU: Mayor and city council FRCI!: 't 1'b John Buckley, Parks & Recreation Director SUBJECT: Weekly Report VANDALISM OUr city has experienced minimal vandalism this past summer. Nuisance type vandalism such as: painting play structures and shelters, stealing signs, defacing picnic tables, tipping over toilets and trashing waste barrels have =ed at some park sites. 'Ihe "hot spots" f= vandalism is directly related to the age of the youth living in the adjacent neighborhood. Ingerson, Hazelnut, Valentine, and Perry have been troubled parks in the past. CUrrnnings Park this year has been added to . the list of troubled parks. Fortunately, as the neighborhood youths grcM older, the vandalism will decrease or stop. NEIGHBOR!KX)!) PICNICS 'IWo neighborhood picnics are scheduled over the next two weekends. Mounds view High neighborhood will have their rained out Labor Day picnic on Saturday, September 13 at Valentine Park from 4:00 - 8:00 pm. Chatham, neighborhood will have their fall picnic on Saturday, September 19 at Valentine Hills school from 4:00-7:00 pm. A big turnout is expected at l:xJth events-this may be a good time to educate the residents about the new J::uilding projects and seek support f= the bond referendum. MAIN'I'ENANCE ~S 'Ihe cool wet weather has stimulated the growth of grass so the parks, trails, and boulevards are being mowed on a weekly schedule. Soccer and softball facilities are also being maintained to meet the needs of fall f youth ~r and softball programs. JTB:rk . . CITY OF ARDEN JIILIS MEMEANDUM DATE: September 11, 1992 'XU: Mayor, city council and Dorothy Person, Clerk 1\dministrator FRCI!: Dan WilIkel, Public WOrks superintendent SUBJECT: Public WOrks Weekly Report Lift stations were checked every day this week. All pumps and motors are working as expected. We had repair work to do on some of the exterior lighting at a few of the stations. A manhole on HaInline Avenue north of County Rd. E needed repair. '!he top section of the manhole and the manhole casting had to be replaced. We blacktopped approximately a 20 foot radius around the nanhole. We =ntinue to work the HaInline Avenue od= problem. Last Wednesday, September 2, we added an active bacteria to both our gravity line and the lift station at Bethel College which dumps into our line. On . Wednesday, September 9, the two locations were again treated with the active bacteria. In discussing this odor problem with a representative fram Team Chemical, she informed me that this treatment may help to solve same of the odor problem. We are repairing truck #9. The hitch which attaches the sTlClWplow to the truck was severely damaged late last spring. This hitch needs replacement and MacQueen Equipment now has the parts available to do the repairs . The plow is cu=entl y at MacQueens and the truck will be delivered to them next week to complete the repairs. The =ew repaired and blacktopped manholes and gate valves. We are attel!pting to get ready for the up-coming snowplowing season. I sent out specifications for our one-ton trucks which need replacing. I also sent out specifications for the Park's 3/4 ton pickup that is to be replaced. The quotes are to be returned no later than Monday, September 21 f= review. 1he evaluation of all city streets needs to be addressed. I discussed this matter with Mark Gr"aham and he stated that he will have someone available within the next week. We will send one or two of our =ew to assist with the inspection process. If Council has any questions or =ncerns, please feel free to contact me. . DAW:rk . BRUCE F. VENTO HOUSE COMMITTEE ON <lTH DISTRICT, MINNESOTA INTERIOR AND INSULAR AfFAIRS - 2304 RAYBURN HOUSE OFFICE BUilDING CHAIRMAN: WASHINGTON, DC 20515-2304 Q:ongrcss of the tinitcd ~tatcs SUBCOMMITTEE ON NATIONAL PARKS (202) 225-6631 AND PUBLIC LANDS . - - DISTRICT OFFICE: HOUSE COMMITTEE ON il'lousc of RcprcsCfitatilJCS BANKING, FINANCE AND GALliER PLAZA URBAN AfFAIRS 175 fiFTH ST., E. - RM. 727, BOX 100 ;g)ashington, 39ft 20515- 230t ST. PAUL, MN 55101 HOUSE SELECT COMMITTEE (612)224-4503 ON AGING September 3, 1992 Ms. Catherine J. Iago Acting Clerk Administrator City of Arden Hills 1450 West Highway 96 Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112-5794 Dear Ms. Iago: Knowing of your previous conce!:n regarcUng the operation of the cable TV industry, it may interest you to learn that on July 23rd the House of Representatives passed legislation to impose strong new controls over the industry. As you may know from personal experience, the costs of cable television have sky-rocketed in recent years. According to a study by the U.S. General Accounting Office, the average monthly charge for . the lowest cable service rose by 56% during the first four and one-half years following deregulation. This is more than triple the rate of inflation. In an attempt to reverse this trend and to once again protect cable subscribers from such abuse, I voted along with 339 of my colleagues to re-regulate the cable TV industry. This legislation, the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act or H.R. 4850, has two main goals - - cut consumer costs and promote competition. In order to achieve these goals, the bill, among other things: directs the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to create a formula for setting the maximum price a cable operator can charge for basic service; requires cable operators to include all local broadcast stations, as well as Superstations, in their basic service packages; grants the FCC the authority to reduce rates for higher tiers of service if the rates are determined to be "unreasonable"; and allows the FCC to set the top price which could be charged for rental of cable equipment (i.e. remote controls). In addition, cable operators will be restricted from forming exclusive deals with program providers in order to put an end to the practice of price and term discrimination which have been used against competing multi-channel broadcast delivery systems. . PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER Cc: JdC:I:E t- q-I/ -9CZ - . . . Ms. Catherine J, Iago September 3, 1992 Page 2 I was encouraged by the large number of votes in favor of re-regulating the cable industry. Unfortunately, President Bush has already threatened to veto these tough new consumer protections. In fact, according to the President, it is unnecessary to place such burdensome restrictions on the cable industry. You can be assured, however, that many of us in Congress do not share the President's view and that we will continue to work for the interests of consumers and push for this legislation to become law. Warm regards. SinCerelY'~ V~ Bruce F. Vento . Member of Congress . cv: ~ r-);:f <l'-' , --f,.., r C? <0 {::: Cl--- \:2 .!z::i:a~.86 "3"8t...!.ij;:icJ:, u:~c ., t>:::l '0"''0; "", ....~.....:"t:l ::.>,....: <>"::1 "::' 0 V ..0.0'::;: ",._... ILl DIU IU 0 .. III ~ '" - '" - ::1;:1."_ .. o. ::J '0 .,. .... r . '~~'O'2i00lle. :g.~';.;t~-5]~ '6'~~ ~E.~.!:! ~1l81 .,g3~Oi:ll..;.-=~ ,g:ii>.y-:S,g .S.gg .., ~ Gf 8. =:-=.=.:!! =-",""...'1:3 5.:.-::: ;::IOC~ ..."'....E ,""c"'.S-":'v.oo 'E:>,'E.~g<l ..:="<:;"", >. __ 'iJ1 o~liG~5 EE"~a;8E~ ",-g~ .o~2.g. ~~F;:::I g8~t.Il5gg7d !.l.o.g,e~-5 '0:;15 ~ -=:J ru 'J ;.g~5~'O 1182l3E.....~.~"'~.2g ~~e1 E~.i~ -g.~:E;g:;:;~o~ [1EE.~.E'O f?E~ g. 0C\\:::::, .g...;S~.:l.E 5~.=~:ag~~~.:!IS'~ ~]g.g 'S.~l?:eIl ~::~t~o..;::g -,.W~[.s'5~~ a~:a ~~ ".U ~ ~ -5"'=0-= '-"'u .0'0 000:1'50 ... ~ .. '" -~ . =oQ>ooo>f-. o......"'~ ~c ",Il> ~ :<;l'5S>'~ ~:'3-=.56.:g5::"':9~~ ~~.~O aO:'=l~.5 <u~::.~'" "iiQ,..e.o~ ~L=~: ~~ tl'a~>.:3... ~eE>''':l'gEg~.9.Q'a "'~.~rl ~:~:CE oR~g.?;~il~ ~t~~;"a'~ .!l~e.'it~1I1 ~~ a-e-5 gE~~5~.~.5.8e:gS .~~~~ ~~Eil:. "3!.l<l>.g~:::~~ o:l'O:=~& ~'~:;;g~::l ~~~~~~ Ei2~i~~i:~8~ .~~5~ .B~~~ ~:~Jg~:~ ~:~~~~ :~~~~~ O~o:ll:'1c.... ~c",""'....O~,~.S~:tc"''''~I1.l::l'O'u.g5 E~g...~';;j""~ "''I;I..;g~.", ~03::oE:N ::Z::r=o;t>ciF=lt<l>'a&e~~E_ <;jo:l'C~3:: ...~<...._~.-=:.......;;;~3::u.c:l..;~:I31:o~."'t:i!5i...-=S!i .sU:;c~E.!d, :t'5..cOBo;;lC.2- -S~O .~o'.sE -S~Sg~,g8t 8..8.g8.~t ~8e::E'58~ ."'~.:S fil' U EE- "'1.1.....0' 0"'0 ''0 V.J::i'"' 00\0>.0 "'0' . ,>!",~." 0 '"'0 o:lll)'"' ~"'O'" - o'::IE .~~.~oJ::.=-Sv- ..=!o '"'u'- 00'<::.0'" o_~... '::l'-"~'::;.J::i... 8- =:::Z;';:; -a'-:-o ~ :c'tl"'~.c::::;=-5;::;8.,(,!at' 5l~ ~S.s ....~<-::=!'8 c.~~~ 9-S~'t:E'~,-;: 2~';U:'~5 '2ciiE~ ~ [~jj~f~~'Ei~J)1 ~; ~J~ ]~~:1 ~~~) ~j"'Oiii~ I~!~t~ ~iJ~ ~ ..."'~ I:o>Bool 1:0 '"' ~ .~~~_; ~E"'~ >''''~5~B~ K",g~...~ 5ou~ ..... .c::;:::~'8!!1.gi'l"''''v",'Il'a 1'5 v8",,,_ '",:;;;1" ''''0::1 c..:':;::I "''''._ = "'........... ..."='......_ o -Ut:!::I';:i :t"", ~-=, l:o"",cCcr-. 11:= c"'.::: '.::l'a ;:: 0.>2 0 '" -S>."'.... "'..8"" ~ c...;~:g~~I58.~~l!~~~ ~ eE'28.a~~i~~.,;~~~'2jg,. ~~[:r si'oei71 2==gfii ;: ~~~'5~,g.s! ...o.>o~i~"''B 1:o'E""~"'5::::::;e.J::iK.ca~o:fle:.:::e's~~ ~t;~g-s: ':2arl "'0 -;; ~l1=-'Q~~..\olE'''.~t::a~~.::~~&. .~@!!8:E2~j:2:q:8'8.:S-S::;=Q~g~'B20 ;SeC!<~~ 73.<;::0.>'':;2 IXI ..c,g '" ~:r 8, ~ _~ oi.5.... /:I = ~ !a ~.<;:: '" o:l.51 3:: I,...., ~!l ~ ~ 1:.::;:; a 0 [a a ~ ~ .~ c..~ .~~ 3::. ~; g ~ = !. .~. ~~~il:o:l[~~1S1S-a~5<l>":a'O'BP:>.0l"0 Q::I'"' ~c:@8''''ocooo =>,.u'~...~G.c....", o E! '2o]~.;;;lg'S.e.8 ';;::=C:ccu8g,gcc~8RCl5~~1A5...~u~li~tOie:;:so\:'.g6s...l::-sil("'3::'...ef'l ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ij.:J .~~ :~.~~:~lj::z:.g~~ ~ ~ a.t:. ~~.ji s:.~~ ~ SF ~~j~ ~.~ 8~ ~~d5~~ [~]~ ~~ -- ---- ~ v ~.;; '" l'e g , ~ ;: '"'0' ~-e~ & Q Q) ,!$~~~ S I>. 7ol:l :>.. '" ....- '" ... ~ ~ ~ -5 \0 C'j ;"Jj~ -- 5: .... u ,. j ..c: .~ "' 1i::' _.~ d ~ ~i~ Z ~-. EOl"'; oo...r r/) z; ~ . ~ ~i ~~~ · ~'~ 1:: if~ ~ ~ ~ o .;] .golS ~ ii~ ~~.s . v III ~ =-&8 ....-4 ~ Ie: ltl 0 '" . . ~ E ~ ~ e.~ .... '\ 00 e"" ~ QJ ~ ";0: .. ~ ,S ~ ~.~:a . "'.: ",-S-g rJ:.J "'El 5u.~ Z' ~ :~~~: ~ ..::I ~-S.= cj H i~! ~ =.5 c~.g ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ,........., .... 0 - c.. "oIh C I::!;; r"\ 8 0 "d'- a ~ ~ ",_u O E ~ .c~9 - = n';:; l:1 ~ 0>,. '" ~ ,.,... ~' !; '[~~ . '-' '::'i .s'2-8 = ~ i~ = ~ ~ .. :r::l - ~ ., .~ W' ~ ~ ~2 ~ ~ .0 li~ Q) :: E e'~ CI':l 00 1:0"" :;... j;;.g = u~ S'O O S '. '. "go rl'g'f! N _ ft= "".'" ' 0\ =. t;] ~~~ Q\ r" 0 'c~ ._ Ii ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~5 ~ .: CI':l, ....Og...o __ +"'''''''''''0 tV ....a........). ~ , :l..'....0 ::::!'!~8J, oo~o 0' ~~o cij'O~.s6N .0-5 ::i~ 8~~==gg;~ ' ....... '1"""'1 ..., ~ '" - - '" ~ c "'\() !l(J '"'.. 0 u . ..0 .~ 0 -. Q~O'>.. c'"'.';;o~" "l'C ~-=E.' 'a...~s...-<J' 8,~~l3c ",c...B8.o.>'Oo ' 8........ 'tl ~.. '" .... '1ij ~ - ";;) <L> _. - 0 c..._ ::E'- 0.< .. c '" -,..\ r,-, ~ ~lfa...~ 8,;~:':~ ~I:o 'if~~E .:3e~1i~~'C 1..!l~'8 9:;->..s~!!.,g a.> .....,..,....., P '0",.. .c:: .""c '" c-....'" ""'O...I't....c 0....0"'0 ~ w _ .... ~ ~ a~g-d.~~Eg~.s~ ll<>a>' "EU2:~"'''' ~~o;:;t: ..:]&,!J-Sc~~ f;:lc ~ "'8cu.-<l>"" := -~o:l] ."'-:;;"';0:50\ "'''''-''''''' g,c=~<I<I~ ~ gf ~ li~;~H!~i ~g;~~~ IH8.;~~iH!J~ ~~]dH~ =....-4 ,U ::;H~':;;-9=:91:1'" 'CO). ~">'>.o=:>"';:"".t:"" ~= .g:5:..D.<:Io.cl~ ""'-. Z =c: ~ '"' ~.- -8 '" ...."" ~ .0 ~ '1;1 ~ :l 0.>' 0; 0 -< 'B =- = 0 c 0 El.- .., ._.~ -s ..: - >::"d )I""""~ :E >.~~..~g,~ <i'* '5to.s:iS>"''''3::'''''''E&~E~~ ~;;B~S6~ O ro ~ c~..c x-<..., (Jt~ e.J>...3::....J::i.~~.,.5~o.,~ 1::0.>.~::I '<L>c....5-.=~d ,...,. ~ ~i g~;~ ~~ 8 ~E~.~]~g ~~ J~:]g.~'~~~ ~1 ~~i~~~~ ~j] @' """""'" rn o.>'.:::.81:! o:l-;;l.t:.~ ~ C1,<=l.cl.c "'.... ~ ---~-- ---- '....s::: '6;, ....... g's "O.s" N. ;;i .' Sl'Ciii ~.~ -'-~ ,.==.g~ ~ ~ i-.., J \J ~'~E ~.,l;l",o"g ,g~ >-~ If C<l :g,Q) I-t._.~ ~.o::c v;. - ~ co .." ' ' .- ~ 0 .s' z <u \::S . ~. Cl3' '0':._ U Il) ~.Cl3 V.....:~ 'g"'~ ~"',g"" >-,,0 "'"' gl,8o C () ~~ :: S - ," e <n U ct::::: r.n. Co'" ,._~~.._.::I tJ.) ~ Cl3 -- ..... ~ CJ~ ~ -5:: . ~">-. ~ 8"&' g 's 8 -5 0 ~ ~ +0 c pg~ -=: @ 'l< i;~'5 ~ ';;; c 2 0 l5: "8 "" bO ~'Il) <n ~ 9 ~. Cl3' 5;.:::; V \{l ""- o.s~ E-" "'.... OR r?o \! ~ .s:::: 'i" '::r 01l.s ,"''' '0 '-.J oofi .ocQ) Uco:1 o...Q....,8 ~ -@,g'f;;.s >-:I:,s E"8. '" 'V :::l _ ;;.-:a -aQ).... c ;E:-' e <'-I:: "" .~ 0 -5 0 tJ.), co:1 ::I C \::S a~co:1 s:8~ .9:S'~ ~~ 8~ OQ ~ ......... 0 .- ~ t:. d):;; .. C 0 , Q) ..!.5 C ;n.- -- c ~.. 8. s - j Il) U >- "....'O.s g - " := .~ eQ rl c ~ 0.. 2;0 :::l .- ~ S d B~ .s B= ~ .s, @ Ii J~ ~ ~ gg'u'2 o.g o. C = Vi :; ~ 0 e $ 2;oc >,,::::1 8 0.-::::1>, O<'-lQ) 01-0 E: 5 il"' :a ': ~ S g -g ,co-; "'. 0 ,,~ ~- -"'Bo"", ",g!O U'O~ IBE~ . . VJ .:; .~ i:"::I tJ.) d) U ~ i::.5 tJ.) o.~ o. ,,~ ~;~~~- I~ " sB~ i~o >< -5 OJ) .....- Q) ;>. 11) Vi C Q) ..... ... d) ,oc 000'1-0 'I-oU =.. ~e <n5 c~~~~~ 8VJ~ ~..e B~~o o 0 ~ . OJ ~ 0 c:3 eo 0 Il) :::l'o ~ ~ F"''''",>~ ~~~~'O ' 0..15: -- ~ VJ .~co<J50..0<n.3= O~O ~~?; ~ e'O 0 ~ ,<,!; eo o..g ~ :0 ~ co:1.ol!] 8~ tJ.) 2;o>.~"c'S 8,00-.0 c ~ ~ ~'-",.c \::S .~ o'~ .-.",= B g e .c ';:j o..:::l 1-0 eo ~ _ 0-, U <n ~d) 00 u a~.o'-~-S::l j~o~ ~"'OVJ ~ ~.o <n -S ~ c:3 Il) ..rJJ d) tJ.) C tJ.) . - 0 ._ -5 '-'..8 cu' <1)::1 ": U ~ '5 ~ 9 ,5 >. VJ.C:;; >. g <I).~ ::l 'Oec-oS~':; g:S~C'i~Eg~ ~.8 [~g ~~~!;~& ~3~~ ~~ ;'5 ~~ Il)~ 'N ""~-B ~--~ u"",. ..J 0._ 'q) ~ eo. ~ ..Q 0 C .... c -5 I ~ "" ~ 13 a,~.~ a ~ ~ ..... 0.0 ~~ .c Q) 'a 0 ~ -a '- 5F!5~''E-~.;6'S~& 5 ~ ~r:5'- 5~ ~ " ~ ~ _ ~ = 0", >-,3 B e .- :I: .g.s >--. - E g. '" :,:. ",,g '" '" ~ i:2 "2 ~- g 88 8u$~~a~~E~~c'c::C~-g ~~~~ \:U'! ., ' "~o013-;'" B;'.:: ~~,g 8B >-.g J~,q.~ . "tl.g co: . .' _',. ... 0 ~ C I ~~~~i~~~~g.ig~~~ ~~"&I~"~~~ ~!:: i, :of d) .... . . '. .... '-.9 c:: . ~ ~' . ~ a.,.~~~~,.,j ~ ~ a g go~.g ~.g _ ;;:: u....('tI.s::IO'(,) _ v.t OVl -8~5_ \::S E "'''''''''5"2.-'''"' > a 0 'g U ..~ >,,-8 ~ 0 "0 ;: ~ .1:! ~ .s e "'N '- U d) "0 S .2, >..~ U 9 . 8 OO.u ~ eo ~9~~i ~ e%e~e~=~~@ .cs 2Pe..!. d) ~1-0 ~ ~ >. ~ d) :: d)'1:: I v.t'~.- 5 c:3 32 >- C) B - co - >-- U ~ ,- C ~~.uco:1~ ~,' ~~~~i~B~~9 i~ .;:1 "Ot::~o::lO u'c~ E-8- 'N '" "~.- " .g~" '" - . ~B .o~o.c ,ctii-5 ~.,jll) ,~~~.. :;tc~~ .s~ .~ ~.s 0 -3~ '1-0 ~ 0..::9 1-0' VJ ~ ~ ~ .'~ a.i 5 ~".,r ci (:) >- ~ >---0 ~c U ~ >- "'0,.... ~ '-' I o.M'" <n "'0 1-0;;'-' tJ.) 0 0 ~::a c-st:::::""'" ;;.- >,0 ~ ~ .....6 c d) ~.~ tJ.).- c:3 VI C ;;. ~ c: ~'~ ~ .- c Q) 0 0 VJ 15~ ,B.S~~~~;~'~tiit'-g~ !~ 0 "2 "2 ,- ~ So g s .c "'N 5 ~ ~ ;n 6 :g:: ~ r- .s .... 0 :coB 0.. ~ -0 .~ .s t8 ~ _,E",= .c 0 es ->- 'Ou", '" ,,",~'" "'5 ",'0 ...... iE 13 v.g'fi~t:Q]'-' ....._._ <l) . = o~c~8 ... .8 fl ~ g,1o! ~ E:".s '1::S 0 ~~.-8 \::S r? c:>. [/);>M eo ~ ~v.t~ Q).go>,Io-< ~ Jo... . ~.~ I '-' - co:1 ._=o~ ~,~.E "'<::s<,::,"'E....Q,. &:~~~,g'" ,0 6.5.......9 <n~:;::l C) rJJ ;:: olo!"'''''' ..,Q 0 "'~ ~.g,~ a ~ ~ g ~ ~ ;::6'5~~~"'C/J €~~~'n .~ - ~ u_ 0 i...... >--B" ~'_.... 0 Ii.- -..l::" . Q - ;.. Q 0" ,-,>- '" I'~ ~~'Oou'O ~ ~"";o.o.......t::S. '-' .c;;'-' d) " .g~~~"'~ b ~~ ;:..~ti~~":: (j~~ '8 ri~~~~ 1'"0 U'U ;.:::: ~ ~ ",::Q"!;", ......i:! '30<:"'->- '"0' ....... Q"'"'-olI ....... ~ ~ I .. "'0.--;: , ;"'''<::1 ~{; <::S"..l::;" '" ...lg,oil.~u ,~ ' -a c .~ <:> ............."i;:;-.......QE ,'=;a~ c:3 = ca Q) VJ 0 ....s::: ~~=t::S~~~......~ g..3$l1~ '"0 "::>iB '0 'p ~ \..J ~'5 ~ ~'5 =:~~ ~ 8,all"'~ ~ .s ;;: :a ~ (]) 0' .~ -gu 'O~~~- >> S .~ 0-4 0 0 ,c "0.... 1-0::::'" c:3 d)::I '" ,g u,," g "" :g J, .. ""' 0 ~ 0 v ~ 0 .. SIl)~U Cl c -d'.c,9 ,0 ~ " @'O- ~ " ~ U S::E 0 ~ 'a 0 :0 '" o ..... >- VJ ~ a ~ ~ ,....., Sb- oo'C U) ~ ~ (]) '0 c ~ eO:: . I'oo:l " U ~ "'8'0 :".B~ '0 g::l ... _ ~ >- ~ ,cooBa~~- " "E = ~u ~ U q) e "'11l ~ ,~ " 0 .. "" ._.t:: .c ~ '" .g = ~:O~ Ssn oS 10! u <n'- C ::l::' "'0 ~ ~ 0 0 (]) v::CoQ,.- .9 co '" ~ ,D '" '" \:U ~ ,:a ~ ...." nz:..u ,....., :S'O oE .:. - co'- ,....., - Il) 8 v ~ . ~ ~c~ Io-<U~ "39.~ .5 -= 1 ... .... '0 '1) ..... <1> 0 (l) <:J ~ '" ~ ;:: ._ "J:: <1> ~ 0 U.c: 0 a:l -5 ~ 8~t2~~~ C z oo~ 0'-0)0........ ~~~ >> (]) ~ ~8'a "O.e9~,5g ..d----...~ ~.~-5~ ..c:: ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ , nE[ ~1-o~~Io-<e u~S 8O'i~ s ~ B~:: ca '" ~~ 5~.e~~~ 5<nX~o""<n~ r./J 3 o . a.1! -d .>i =05 <1>0 ~o~ ~vc9~9at = ~ : "'-'ij! " O~ ~ 'I-o~_, Q)::Ivca~Cl3<1> .. ~._", ,- .;:: 8 ~.... 0 ","0 ~ <Q g ij! cot: ~ 1;; 8 1;; >-~ -.i;'O.g .s :::: - t:I ~ 6 C :: S >. 'S ~.c 5'- 'Ou~._o _ - ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 J fi 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ fr~ ~ E 0 .-< '~;:: '0 "'. . Z 4l> 4-i:-' Q;)..~ ~. '5 ~ >..11) Q) 'o~oo'-~ I-< B~ v:l OJ)ooc~"..~QQ ~ ~-3 ~>,~ > u.c <~< C &"'8:9 ~"'"' ~~~~~~~~.1!~B~II~~-B~~ ~ "".- :::::J ~'C:= '" ..l e ' - 8 0 co" '" , aJ ';is' ~~=tl == g,o ~ &. .a] g,~ ~ Iii ~ B .l:l ~ .B ~ ~ o o~ o~ ,~ .... o,g 0-- <I.l ._ <n q) ...... b4U VJ VJ U U r.. = '" ~ ~ . Irene Brodi:_ .age 101, has wrj~en 10 Washln'gton, D.C., ~oncernln'g abuses she perceives in the national farm subsidy program. She stands ~~~f~~rCla' reading nook equipped with a magnrlyi~9 monUor in her Presbyterian Homes, residence, Arden Hills, (Review photo by Brad A person is never too old to fight injustice I......'.:,'."'.'.'... :..':".,.":..,',..:..".'..":..,'.'..'..'(0.,,.,, :..;.,...'..,."....,,:.,.,..,:.,..,'...:,.,.',.,.,.:.,'.-. :'.,1 ,ilho",""o", of th ,'''', mer of on, C listing them as mem,bcrs 0,[ his methods some producers and their i\.J:tp:E:N;~:LJ:.S);~;i eye. She also has a special new coqxmlLion. attorneys devise to deal with rules ':"--.ii\,-,,,,;,i,;;/iN: device to help her hear. She was so angered by this involving government paymcrrts." __,/__" """,,,,,'''''~'., o~ a rece~t "60 Minutes" sham Ihat she gal out her walker Thccasc is nOw in court, he adlled, by Pamela O'Meara program s~_saw a segment on lhe ,and took a petition 'around to her Wh~ COljlaCaed about Brodie's Irene Brodie of Arden Hills, farm subSidy p.rogram sot up to neighbors at the Presbyterian Letter and petition, Vema's office age 101, is living proof that a. help small.farmers. .T~e program Home, Arden Hills, Campus: said the congressman is interested . person is never too old to fight porU'llYcd a wca, llhy fanner wllo set explaining tlle [.<lud in the farm in learning' more abnut Iier injustice in the world _ even if up a fake cprpoIation of many subsidy program.' Over 100 ,concerns. , slle is legally blind, very ha/d of small farmers to receive the rcsidenlssigned it She then wrote". "It may be a crazy crusade ----,. J hearing and uscsa walker, govemmcntmoney. to President George" Bush, don't know,~ Brodie S<lid. "I h(lJlC Brodie keeps up on what's Secrewyof Agriculture Edward they'll bring out some reforms ill going on in the world by "reading" "BUT MOST ALL, of ,the Madigan, Minnesota Sens. pave the agricultw-e,pepanmenL And the the daily newspaper, attending moneywenUo this fellow, and DUIenburgerand:paul :WeLlstone, farm subsidy"program isn'l l,he weekly current events discussions, (among the, members of the phony and Congressmen GerIy,Sikorski only problem,...... paying people not and following "60 Minutes," corporation were) ~ black men, and Bruce Vento and enclosed a 10 plant.isanother. It's a wnsle 01 "MacNeil-Lehrer" and shabbily-dressed and one missing a copy of herpclition. ,taxpayers',money." , ' "Washington Week in Review':, on tooth,: ~cren 't farmers at all but A friend and fellow' resident at Brodie .8l'so has other cunccrns TV. To watchthcse programs, ~he_w~r~"hired by this ~an ~t ,tlle PresbytcrianHome, age _92 about what's going on in America sits sideways right next lo~e ._,I~U~lmum,_wage," she sal? The herself, typ~ up:,B~od.~c'~.1~t~.r ,- the mjsleading,SlalClllenL~ made Ielevisiun, so ~hc.,., .can ti\'tc~,~~~".,::e~.~,,~~.~.ware of th.e.l~ ,b.os.s which &.'iid: "w.e appcu~,!-O. Y9!l.\O ',' by cand.idatcs at the lIalionill ,," '~bl,,~_':,!\of,;.'><,' ;.1" ".,.,,:'" _ use your aulhont~ to ~.m8;n!xi\llll",.,,_Qn~.C,\~Li.ons..,,~Ql~~}(allll~Je, 3].HI r" <,)(. ..,~...."'\~,, " '. speedy eut-off of the subs(dleS,' to.- PreSident .Bush s squelchlOg oj 11 bring justice to bear on the' health plan carefully wurked oul hy pcrpcuaLOrs of this miscarriage of heath care providers and pu.'\scd by justice !llld government money, and the LegislalUTC in Oregun. B d. (to ensure) that future funds go to ro Ie worthy people for which it was SHE READ AROUTihe . . . intended." Oregon henlth plan in Iii,' Co"tlllu~<ifr{)UlI."ge6 Brodie expl;lined, "It's nw[ully ]]ewsJlaper~ by using her reaLlillll hard fur people trying IU make a machine which magnifies wordi60 memories, published ill 1989. Just subsistence living on their farms. times and puts them up ori 11 after she finished the book and was This (farm subsidy) bill was ctrawn computer-like screen. A formcr getting it -ready for the publisher up by the House and Senate and nurse, Irene said Bush vetoed ;"hc she suddenly wellt oHm] ill one ey~ ~gned by the president to :help plnn becaus.,e,',it did not pro'?tk fwm a hemorrhage. Slllall fanners keep ~thcir operation kidney LraIlsp!ants.tO :lIcoh(}licS\lr BUI sht) cOlllinutls 10 he active. working and gel some,ed\lcation on heroic ..heaILh.,j'lT\.easures r'IT Hcr cnergy ami cunccrn aboutlhe farming. 1 hate to,see the big cxtremeJy low'bir(~~wcight b;ilJh" wurld ilavc imp~s.~cd llmsc around COT]Jorutions lake over;lh,e~~illnHy who end upwilh hamlicajls if Ill"; r"rms." "cyen'survive. :. "I was vcry indignant abuut il IT'S NOTl'HE FIRST time ,"~nd I stilL~m," shc said, "bUll her. "She's a \'cry intelligent and p..'1ill. but it doesn't sl(lp her. She's she has writLCll 10 her senator or :', don't know what to do about il." ~etiv~ 'pe~.slll.: c_~)]]siderillg _her doing some!11ing alllhc lime, _ ~ongressman. "1 think I got that She di~, however, send a COJ1~ or m~rnlltles, s:ud EvelYJI Grccn, her "fUSl because wc'rc' (lhJ unc~jl'l lrom my father. He thought you the_artLcle 10 her son, who IS a [[lend and fellow resident of the -mC!ln we lose our IllClllaH:K'ultics. should speak up about things," she 'physio;!an, ,,/ Preshytcrian I rume. wJ'o mc it'sju.st 11'5 g,mxl for the world, l(~ knuw 111<)1 . explained. Brodie has also. wrilicn a book. llI~a...in~ tJmt it wuman_ber ~gc is we nre still pcople 'Willullinds So far, ~e has rcc~i"ed a leller A IesideDl of the'Pr?sbyt.c~iun ~ILil vllal ellough and vllnlly illlercsleu in \lur J:(1VCflllll~'1l1 lllhl from Damel Shawm ,llle U.S. Home for seven years, she JOlllell ~lltCrc.~lcu. tu S<.'C I1mt things that ~ trying III help hUJLlalLilY,"~'('H'i:J1 Dcpartment of 'Agriculture the writing club a few yeurs ago. "I . UTegu~U' HI our gllvellllllClll should added. "And thel\: arc!ilill IlI'(llliI' Ihanking her for her leuer and got assignments, did thCllI and, then be put light inlerestcd ill Illlncsl\" ill petition. Sh,aw suggested Ihal.rne thought".'Wl1y don'l.l put them all "~he puts lhe rcSI \lJ' us l\l su\'ernlll~'Ul.n man Brodie saw on "60 Minutes" together for my children'!'" The shallle. She's had blllll knces was lllking advantage of an result Wil$ a book of her childhuod rcplaceiJ, walks wilh a w;tJker, is in uninlentional loophole in the farm sub~idy progra~. It's a "nev,~r- Brodie... en~l~g baILie, he wrote, .to ConIJnuednnP., 8 untlclpatelheeuremelycrcallve I:t /'----l)uilrtin, l^Je('!,CJ/ocrh,z ,'/ (1(' ,UC'!!'" i 9//1 /cjc~ ~~i~~~~~gestof~lies, pond assesslllents' get 0 K-Y . IARDEt.:H~:;ij''!Ij'1 i ~~~~,'OO'"""tionof'm"'ti,g MaMw>1d,~':"J1!'Lin~,,-tlii.I~;;;'~""'\;h". ;,r"L, Iho" '" olh" , "'''''';;'<,c},""",:;:{i:;;:,:b;~';:':~ "We hav' take l' . . th' CIty l~ paruclpatl.ngan~ that-ttlere is no propertiC51hal drainimo the pond? It is . ,e n eSllmonyon IS ronsparac)'.",, ,: .', ~"," ,.ilIegal"not \.0 assess all properties that by Tim Fu.hrer matter on a couple D.f. oC,:as!on~," AccordinS to city recor~.:the-,area' ire affecled." according to Lawrence. Arden Hills city officials have been ~yor :'J1I~1l8 Slllhcr ~UlI. ~c d like was developed several years ago lind as He added lhal he council was lI)'ing "La Oooded not by rain dripping through a h;re~ity~~o:~~rn.~~IS. d. pan of the develop~nt.,an existing divide,lhcncighborhpodAO.wcwon'Lbc leal:. f . ha ' ", 0 UI a nunagc pondwaslOhavebecnJcloCatCdandre-- 8blelOtakcle alacu " ave: r~ ;f:~~ed \~i~~:e~~j~' ,system that will carry water from the sized 10 boldthe,'!id!~9n&"sumnwa~,. '~' ,Res.idCWts:I,SO q~:lio'ncd a July 27 improvements to a stormwaLer rerentioh' ~~ ~~~~:l ~w:e \.0 anolhc~ ~off as a ~ult qf:the dcveI9P~~~~t.: summf!lY,:~f!he project,which they iillY pond. ' '?9. ~I,OIla workwasnevefh:c?,ropleted,;'" they did not rece1ve unul the day of the During its Aug. 31 session, the numberw~~~cca~mns, the cHy has (\t last.we_ek::9,,'~~arjngi';; a(ea '"counc;U,mceting. Arden Hills City Council, amid-char es pum~"'Gr fro Lbe pond: ' i) '. residents saI4.CltY;',~1~1~S; :~:a~e, riot ,;, .,' J"be: SUmmary, which was prepared Lbat city officials "blatantly' lied" an5.js and As~Ocia:m~~r:y~~~~,Stev.:art ~ed _P:l~ or m,it:tIm,~I~}nanl1ct i by.aty:':~UOmey Jerry Filla, includcda planning "an illegal ,assessment~" cOnsultant on the . t id I~CC[Jng, ng USSIOl\$ onw~ys ,to lmpKive . bneLhlStory,'of the Keithson Pond cnlCrtained almost wce hours'ofheatM for the . t's ~~' sac cost . the,~water'runoff:(~" ,~," ......,,~.":r project;,tesidents' objections to Lhe discussion on a PlQposa! \0 build a pond $12 ooero~.:e a ~5,OOO. f>.bout"" __ I.want to kno~ why. the c~ty ,p~po~!Illdthecity'sresponsclD those inthearcanear~eithsonDrive.. ow~ri', ssesse tOPI~y.,..,~ncll~refllS(X(lO~'~luls;,._~~~~Ofl1l'>\'~' :'.. The eounci( Wlanimously approved . "The'eit is takin on bl~tantl~ ~ 10 property o~~aboul Ad'" H"U the project after the he;aring,-,which Jhe cost;" tounciltemt~~~~~ thIS,~~'Kurt~wrencco,~d,,~',:'; ,r. ,~.n ,.1 S."" . .000: F'J!~es,,,, g;-. :;-. >:COlltl~ueUonPalle20 __. ._--. - ~> Pal"e 20 Wfo;rl~'~~::;';:~t""9 \OO? THE RlnUITIN - - 'Arden 'Hills/bebaie questions"assessment notification , "It was my und~sumding resi- the associated improvement pro~' :\'on the assessment role_ The', situation,':' Council Member ~ul dents were mai1ed a:copy," Council yides't aoQ.any assessment}.'~ ,:engineer determined that' some, .;:tvfaIone said,"l'~.not sure if. it's. a. Member Dale Hicks said. Acting upontbe'beDefit, is a legalpro~ diain l00pereenl;,some!lOpeICCIIL: >problem of the citY. council,. but, . iClerk-AdministralOlCatberioe lago cedure," _ .-.,..': ",' . \;:~: ,some less man that," ,Filla saidi ';rather, ..a proble,~, of .several \agrees. "My understanding 'Y!'as thaJ. Oilier residents say'that,all of iAssessmcn1s. will range, from :i. property owners," ~ f, ., .,. . 'they were mailed"too,".sbe said.", ". the properties thai drain'into the ',$I.soo 10 $375 per property.. ,;,,,.., MalODe "sa~t!_)here is" ~Slm~, ,'n Because qfthc apparen1mix-up, pond, iI,Lcluding.. a townhouse "" ": qu~stion_ a:j:_,to whethCf :the.. , ,Mark Magers asked the city council devell,lpm~nt, ,at~not included in . RESIDENT TERESA Giel development-in':the areama~e - to reschedule We meeting to a later the assessment. The summary '..said most objections were (Rised stormwaler runoff wone than when ':date, "I hate ID drag this on,but 10 states: that "!hose properties mat in 'because of a lack of communica- the propeitywas un,improved,"But :minutes is not enough time 10 look the council's judgement benefit_ don between the council and then.' we buil.d"s,torm sewers (in . :_over this document" . ..,.. from the improvement have been . residentS, "All we ever wanted similar situations) in other parts of . Sather suggested moving' ,the, ' selecled.for assessment" , -were answers. ~ she said. ''Tonight ~ the city," he,sajd.','I'm really: 10m 'lIearing to adate in early Se~m-. Filla said thar.the townhouse see you all acting ,bored" witbno and would like tohearargumenls," ,bee. "I'm notswe the'reSidents will,., .deve1opm~nl.' has its own eye eonlact. 1 thfuk'thaJ. you should Ma)'or,Tho~,S~ said thaJ. 'have had ample lime to respond,~ stormwatet drainage and does not know that as your ,neighbors, it "the city has a'rcspoDsibility to "he said. contrib~ to the pond, doesn't feel vert good.be be here." provide a rea~onably" !"safe , Residents say that they should. Mahowald said il had not been environment'lt wouldbe,!1~ligoot 'HICKS SAID "that. if the ' not have to pay for the project ~:the council:s intent ,~'to hide for the citY,.-to.say il's'_not a '.group wants time, I'd support that beCause they paid the <tevelopel for 'information at,keep (residents),in PfOblem." ,,', ::',,;'. 'rom tired of innuendo and lies pond improvements. Residen~'also ,'1hc dark, It's been a long project: 1 ; " Gouncil. ,Member Thomas (about the actions of the council on said that city officials: did' nOl "don't say that with pride. ,I,t has~, .1t:ahowald. agr~ed" "The issue i~" mallO'," '" "', prop'''Y '..peel th, po,d hefore'_ . te>lbook ......p'eof ~ow to 'co,'d he ",,<<(- ~. '''I 00,' . Mahowald said that he "was not releasing the d~veloper's 'dOaprpjecl,,' ..:-..... .:"<", 1; (theKeilhsonPondpro~}on.the ,sure what will be, ,gaine,d , by performance bond" 'Construc'uonon; the Keithson.~ benefit. There- isla 'whol~ ser of: ldelaying this further. Everyone Aeeord\nglO the sum'mary, all Pond~prO~t is, schCduled'to stari~:un~circumstanCc.s," :)....( l::~:H~: ,knows where everyone else stallds. RSSCssed properties contribu1e some shortlY.:~,after, L~b:o,r:~a.y,;:;.",n,d':i'~';'::r,~e ~!tr .c~pncil scheduled '8' '; If we can engage m a commen~. runoff, to the pond and, the ProccedliU1anncd.'; '.' ~ "':'~':,;$:,,' ,,:,,"~bh~ bearmg-,on" the proposal for that's fine. But if we're going 10 be assesslIIents,"areapportioned based', . . }_ '~""'" .:'~'-':j,t~.' ',"li:Jts~~~ 28"ses:sl_on. . called liars, r~dents ~ not going upon the resulting beACI1Lprovided .... :rhe' A,roen: HillS, Cit~iq>\n~,i~;':'I':_',.-:",:: _' . ;:;: to fmda reapUve council." lDeachp~pcrty." ,last week. li1-so accepted ~ids'on, . i'>;"; "I.,":' ,',' .~: :"-fter a I5,minute re:ess,. Filla Fi!la sai~ the city hired an Arden pta,ce st.pnn'seweri~~l&L, ';/:~I."" '-'.' " ~vlewed the summary.' Residents appJalSCI to look at each property .ment proJect,:RQ,-SoCO~ actmg,',::';..... ">'.'~'~".: , . ,:,. ;play not be comfortable with the and to determine a maximum Inc. is ,t~e '1ow'bidder,,'for"thv-"'+I\;-"' .' '. ,::' "":r. '~(:;:::L,:, :answers they get, but ~ey are the assessment, "He came up with 'project, wbichw~I~.~:()fl)bOLtt;J..t~::.' ,', :\>,_,~,>:.<~'L""': .o,ly o""~" th,y >011,,,. h," .boul$1500'FIII'~ _O'~2"OO', I ,.>"!"'^"~'~I(~".' ,. . ,,"" ,.>'~"" 'I' c ,.,," ,'" I 'said. "',the'-as'sumption that (water from', The project'will'rel? ce'_:a:. ., :'/kt~. ;',;~:,l ''-;;'ir" 'c',; t ,;..",:~" tbe) entire Ii'arcel drained into plugged storm se,~r:i'~lti ,'~~' , ' ~~;'~. : 1.'1.~(1"':;~".~ ll?t<'l~;:~,'" ',;' MOST R~mENTS claim the. pond." .' .- ,which caU$CS ,flooding'tO:.t~te"astf: 'tx~~/ :"~' "q' ,~..~,' !',":- " ':" ~ 'proposed assessment is illegal. "Based on the city's engineering one home in the area duriog'Jieavy'rf.~~.; :;~ 'i,,-,.~~l':.f~;', According ID the summary, assess- judgement on how the lots drain, rains or the,sprlng snowmelt . .. . :.t,_:"?:"~ . ." ',ti;' _: ments "are based upon the benefit thal:'stbe ~s for_ the percentages "This is another sticky \~/ ,'.1 ':'~\ I 'J:', "....' . ~ ;]3u/lefln N eel) c; /ce; /,~ L'C' ~7kKc>f '1j, /5.<.. STATE OF MINNESOTA RA.\1SEY COUNTY CONCILIATION COURT COUNTY OF RAMSEY MAPLEWOOD BRANCH S09261270 SEP 9 1992 . CASE NO, Jl;DGMENT ENTERED ON Francis Podlasek City of Arden Hills 1455 W llwy "6 4410 No Snelling Ave Arden Hills, Mn 55112 Arden Hills, Mn 55112 -VS- Maier Stewart & Associates Inc 1939 5103n Place St. Paul, Mn 55117 Plaintiff(s) Defcndilnt(s) NOTICE OF JUDGMENT The above-entitled case has been decided and judgment entered as indicated: ~In favor of the PLAINTIFF(S) and against the Defendant(s) for S~ d() In favor of the DEFENDANT(S) and against the Plaintiff(s) for S In favor of the DEFENDANT(S) WITHOUT DAMAGES. In favor of the DEFENDANT(S), &DGMENT BECOMES FINAL AND TIME TO APPEAL EXPIRES ON SIP 2 9 1992 TE: Minnesota Law allows collection procedure to commence immediately after date stamped. DEFAULT JUDGMENT A DEFAULT judgment has been entered against the DEFENDANT(S) for S JUDGMENT BECOMES FINAL AND TIME TO REOPEN EXPIRES ON NOTE: Minnesota Law allows collection procedure to commence immediately after date stamped. - DISMISSALS . DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE . . TIME TO REOPEN EXPIRES ON THIS JUDGMENT MAYBE PAID IN PERSON OR BY MAIL AT THE ADDRESS GIVEN BELOW BY PRESENTING THIS NOTICE WITH THE PAYMENT MADE PAYABLE TO "RAMSEY COUNTY CONCILIATION COURT'", DO NOT SEND CASH, RAMSEY COUNTY CONCILIATION COURT MAPLEWOOD BRANCH . 2785 WHITE BEAR AVENUE MAPLEWOOD, MINNES<YfA 55109 /!/J~"Z<- Telephone: (6U) 777,2651 ,,-,,"-if !, - READ REVERSE SIDE CAREFULLY." vW.....r4-tt ~~ J..' ;" THE FOLLOWING IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE, BUT PROVIDED 1D NOTIFY YOU OF CERTAIN PROCEDURES. SHOU. YOU HAVE QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT OUR STAFF, ALTHOUGH SOME CIRCUMSTANCES MAY REQUIRE 1D REFER YOU 1D AN AT1DRNEY. C\lOST FORMS NECESSARY FOR THE FOLLOWING ARE AVAILABLE FROM THE COURT. APPEALING A JUDGMENT 1D DISTRICT COURT The judgment notice contains all of the information needed to fill out the appeal~ the title of the case will remain the same as in ConsciI- iation Court. A Demand for Removal and Affidavit of Good Faith must be completed in duplicate and signed before a Notary Public, by the appealing party or their anorney; a copy of the Demand and Affidavit must then be served on the opposing party. Service of these papers may be by personal service upon the party or their attorney by a disinterested party, who must then complete an affidavit of personal service and sign it in front of a Notary Public, or by First Class Mail to the opposing party or their attorney at their last known address, after which you must complete an affidavit of mailing stating that you HAVE MAILED the papers to the opposing party or their at- torney, the date that you mailed them, the address to which you mailed them, and that you affixed the proper postage to the envelope. The completed Demand for Removal. Affidavit of Good Faith, Affidavit of Service and the correct filing fee must be filed in the office of the Clerk of Conciliation Court by the close of business on the final day as stated on the Judgment Notice. ' The fees ar/~ f~r a trial by COURT (without a jury) or~for trial by a jury of six persons. 1ft ad~iliQR, the.. i, . $3 "".barge -roT 7....:' P-:l""'Y ulne haJ nat pre. iell:l.sl~' p~iti ::l (pf'o ;... t:he ea3e. NOTE: If a case is appealed,lo Pistrict Court, that Court may. in its discretion, allow the prevailing (winning) party to recover from the aggrieved (losing) p~rtya'n amb~~t - not to exceed~ as costs under certain circumstances where the prevailing party on appeal is not the aggrieved party in the original action. ~. PAYING/COLLECTING A JUDGME;>;T' It A judgment may be paid to the Clerk of Conciliation Court; we will hold any checks until they clear, and then send one of our chec to the appropriate party(ies). Under certain circumstances, and when ordered by the Court, payments may be made in installments, up to one year's duration. st:> 7, If a judgment is not paid, the creditor may transcribe the judgment into Distri~ourt ($6 fee), and if a location for some assets of the debtor is known (place of employment, bank) an execution may be issued ( fee, exclusive of service charges) and said assets may be garnished. 'O. If no location of assets is known there is a procedure available after transcription whereby the debtor can be co,!,pelled to reveal the location of his/her assets. Inquire at the Clerks' Office re an "Order for Disclosure" ($5 fee). SPECIAL NOTE FOR AU1D ACCIDE;>;T CASES: Ifar.y person fails to satisfy ajudgment within thirty (30) days after the judgment becomes final, the Court, upon affidavit by the judgment creditor that the judgment has not been satisfied, shall immediately forward notice of such unsatisfied judgment to tbe Commissioner of Public Safety, who shall suspend the driving privileges of the judgment debtor until such time as the judgment is satisfied, The judgment creditor may obtain the affidavit of identification and of unsatisfied civil judgment, as required by M,S, 171.82, at the office of the Clerk of Conciliation Court. CLERK OF CONCILIATION COURT - ' 2785 White Bear Avenue Maplewood, Minnesota 55109 (612) 777-2651 . ** REV I SED ** ~, AGENDA .. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 1992, 7:30 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDERIROLL CALL 7:30 P.M. 2. AGENDA ADOPTION 3. ))d>PROV AL OF AUGUST 31 COUNCIL MINUTES 4, CONSENT CALENDAR a. Authorize Expenditure of Appraisals for Harstad, City Hall, and Arden Place Sites. b. j..4(dopt Res. No. 92-62 Premises Permit for Class B Pull Tabs - Lions Club. c. t-Kdopt Res. No. 92-63 Approving the Bingo Hall License Application. d. Adopt Res. No. 92,64 Clarifying Proposed Sums of Money to be Levied for Levy , Year 1992 Payable in 1993. e. ~dopt Proclamation Declaring September 27 as U.S. Army Reserve Day. f. Receive and Accept the Proposal to Inspect the Water Tower on Fernwood Avenue. g. Approve List of ClaimslPayroll. . 5. PUBLIC COMMENTS 6. UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS A. Discussion of Proposed Revision of Administrator Job Description. (Available Monday - Attorney Filla). B. Case No. 92-16; Site Plan Review, 1160 West County Road E (Old Hoigaard Building), Joe Commers. C. Authorization to Extend 90-Day Leave for Public Works Employee. D. Discussion of Bond Referendum. 7. COUNCIL COMMENTS 8, ADJOURN SEPTEMBER MEETINGS OcrOBER MEETINGS September 8-Worksession, 4:00 pm October 7 - Planning Comm, 7:30 pm September 14-Council Mtg, 7:30 pm October 12- COLUMBUS DAY - HOLIDAY September 15-State Primary Election October 13- Council Mtg, 7:30 pm September 17-Public Sfty/Wks 7:30 pm October 15- Public Saf/Wks, 7:30 pm September 22-Park & Rec Comm 7:30 pm October 22- Finance Comm, 7:30 pm . September 24-Finance Comm, 7:30 pm October 26- Council Mtg, 7:30 pm' September 28-Council Mtg, 7:30 pm October 27, Park & Rec Comm, 7:30 pm AGENDA ~ ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEETING . COUNCIL CHAMBERS MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 1992, 7:30 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL 7:30 P.M. 2. AGENDA ADOPTION 3. APPROVAL OF AUGUST 31 COUNCIL MINUTES 4, CONSENT CALENDAR a, Authorize Expenditure of Appraisals for Harstad, City Hall, and Arden Place Sites. b. Adopt Res. No. 92-62 Premises Permit for Class B Pull Tabs - Lions Club. c. Adopt Res. No. 92-63 Approving the Bingo Hall License Application. d. Adopt Res. No. 92-64 Clarifying Proposed Sums of Money to be Levied for Levy Year 1992 Payable in 1993. e. Adopt Proclamation Declaring September 27 as U.S. Army Reserve Day. f. Receive and Accept the Proposal to Inspect the Water Tower on Fernwood Avenue. g, Approve List of ClaimslPayroll. . 5. PUBLIC COMMENTS 6. UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS A. Discussion of Proposed Revision of Administrator Job Description. (Available Monday - Attorney Filla). B. Case No. 92-16; Site Plan Review, 1160 West County Road E (Old Hoigaard Building), Joe Commers. C, Authorization to Extend 90-Day Leave for Public Works Employee. 8. COUNCIL COMMENTS 9. ADJOURN SEPTEMBER MEETINGS OCTOBER MEETINGS September 8-Worksession, 4:00 pm October 7 - Planning Comm, 7:30 pm September 14-Council Mtg, 7:30 pm October 12- COLUMBUS DAY - HOLIDAY September IS-State Primary Election October 13- Council Mtg, 7:30 pm September 17-Public Sfty/Wks 7:30 pm October 15- Public Saf/Wks, 7:30 pm September 22-Park & Rec Comm 7:30 pm October 22- Finance Comm, 7:30 pm September 24-Finance Comm, 7:30 pm October 26- Council Mtg, 7:30 pm . September 28-Council Mtg, 7:30 pm October 27- Park & Rec Comm, 7:30 pm . '.0.\ , , . MINUTES CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING August 31, 1992 7:30 P.M. - city Hall ~~LL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Note that Council met at 4:00 p.m. for a budget worksession, and at 6:30 p.m. (in closed session) to conduct a performance evaluation. Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor sather called to order the regular City Council meeting at 7:30 p.m. Present: Mayor Thomas Sather; councilmembers JoAnn Growe, Dale Hicks, Thomas Mahowald, Paul Malone. Also present were: City Attorney, Jerry Fill a; City Engineer, Mark Graham; Public Works Superintendent, Dan Winkel; City Accountant, Terry Post; Acting Clerk Administrator, Catherine Iago; Recording Secretary, Foster. . ADOPT AGENDA Counci 1 was notified that two items should be deleted from the agenda, those being Item 5 "Discussion with Architect" and Item 10D "Authorization to Extend Public Works Employee Term of Employment". Counci 1 agreed to these deletions. Council was notified that two items should be added to the agenda, those being Item lOG "Request from Zeos for Tent Sales" and 10H "Management Financial Summary from Finance Committee". Counci 1 agreed to these additions. City Attorney Filla requested a short closed meeting immediately after the regular agenda to discuss status of litigation involving the City. Council agreed to conduct that closed meeting. MOTION: Mahowald moved, seconded by Growe, to adopt the August 31, 1992 agenda including the above-noted deletions ( 2 ) , additions (2 ) and closed litigation meeting. Motion carried unanimously (5-0). DISCUSSION WITH ARCHITECT This agenda item was deleted under adoption of agenda. Ir . ,. APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MINUTES \" t' Councilmember Malone asked that the third paragraph of page i1" seven of the August 17, 1992 meeting minutes be revised to t 'read: "Norris Strawbridge . . . specific points along the I ~. , Arden Hills Council 2 August 31, 1992 . roofline of the proposed building requiring a variance to 75' height. " Council agreed to this revision. MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Hicks, to approve the minutes of August 17, 1992 Regular Council Meeting with the above-noted revision to page seven. Motion carried unanimously (5-0) . ~O~SENT CALENDAR Councilmember Mahowald and Growe agreed to approve item Ita" under Consent Calendar, but expressed interest in further discussing the item under "Council Comments". MOTION: Hicks moved, seconded by Malone to approve the Consent Calendar and authorize execution of all necessary documents contained therein. Motion carried unanimously (5-0). a. Accept resignation from Jerry Miller, Chair, Public Safety/Works Committee. b, Appointment of Additional Election Judge for the 1992 state Primary Election, . c. Approval Final Pay Estimate #5 for 1991 North Snelling Avenue Improvements. d. Approve Release of Collateral Held on City's Behalf from Norwest Bank. e. Approve List of Claims/Payroll. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments, PUBLIC HEARINGS KEITHSON POND ASSESSMENTS J continued from JulY....20 & ,June 29, ]992) Mayor Sather opened the meeting at 7:40 p.m. for the purpose of continuing a public hearing (from July 20 and June 29, 1992) on Keithson Pond Assessments. Act ing Clerk Administrator Iago verified remailing of notices to affected property owners on July 30, 1992, Reviewing background, City Engineer Graham recalled that estimated assessments for the proposed Keithson Pond project were presented at the ,June 29 and July 20 assessment hearings, where affected residents were given the opportunity to register their objections. . Graham added that on July 20, Counci 1 : 1) Based on the opinion of the City appraiser, established a maximum supportable per lot assessment of $1,500; and 2 ) Based on the opinion of the City Engineer after review of the topography of the area, determined which ,~ . Arden Hills Council 3 August 31, 1992 affected lots should be assessed 100%, 50% or 25% of the maximum supportable per lot assessment. Graham reported that assuming this project were awarded to the lowest bidder, the total cost of the project, including construction and 30% overhead (administration, legal, etc. ) would be $42,558. Assuming assessment rates established by Council on July 20, $11,625 would be assessed to affected property owners and the remainder would be paid by the City at large. Graham stated that a summary of the events surrounding Keithson Pond and responses to all registered objections were compiled within one document dated July 27, 1992 and forwarded to affected parties along with their notice of this meeting. Members of the audience reported they had not received the Summary and Response document Graham referred to. Acting Clerk Administrator Iago commented that she had directed staff to attach the Summary and Response document to the . meeting notices, and apparently the document was not included in the mailing. staff provided copies to all members of the audience. Mayor Sather reminded the public that this evening's meeting will be limited to discussion of previously registered objections. Kurt Lawrence, 4516 Keithson Drive, asked why Council has lied to owners about this project, why no other owners are being assessed when other properties contribute to the drainage, and if the City wi 11 be able to answer those questions in court. Ron Nelson, 4504 Keithson Drive, stated that a letter from residents on his block was sent to the City over 30 days ago. Residents showed an acknowledgment of the City's receipt of their letter on July 15, 1992. Nelson asked why the Summary and Response document was just received this evening. Dick Foster, 4527 Keithson Drive; Teresa Giel, 4534 Keithson Drive; and Jean Crimmins, 4509 Keithson Drive; echoed Ron Nelson's comments. . In light of residents not receiving copies of the Summary and Response document prior to this meeting, Mayor Sather suggested a recess in order to give residents the , opportunity to review the document. Mark Magers, 4521 Keithson Drive~ asked to reschedule this public hearing to f, " 'I' provide residents more time to adequately review the , ~ material. j I Arden Hills Council 4 August 31, 1992 . Jean Crimmins asked when construction would begin. Graham stated that the contractor had initially indicated the work would begin right after Labor Day, but that schedule has now been postponed for a couple of weeks. Attorney Filla commented that the purpose of tonight's meeting is to allow an exchange regarding previously registered objections and responses, and he assured that Council is aware and has considered all the previously heard comments on this issue. He stated that he would be comfortable conducting the public hearing tonight, but if Council so desired, the meeting could be rescheduled to a specific date. Mayor Sather stated he would be amenable to postponing if residents desire. Councilmember Mahowald reminded that those in attendance this evening already know everyone's positions on this issue, and the issue has already been delayed. Councilmember Malone echoed Mahowald's cOTI@ents and reiterated the fact that additional objections will not be introduced this evening. Councilmember Growe stated she would accept postponing or moving the item to the end of this evening's agenda to allow residents adequate time to review the Summary and Response document. Councilmember . Hicks stated that Council has been trying to resolve issues involving Keithson Pond for a very long time, and he does not appreciate innuendo that Council has lied to the public on this matter; he agreed to postpone if residents so desire after review of the material. councilmember Mahowald concurred with Hicks and stated that Council has tried at length to resolve the Keithson Pond issue and is not likely to be receptive to negative comments made against council's intentions ln this matter. Council agreed to recess for 15 minutes, then let the residents decide whether to postpone the hearing, The meeting recessed. Mayor Sather reconvened the public hearing at 8:15 p.m, and reminded residents that discussion would be limited to the previously registered objections and their responses. Attorney Filla asked to focus on each objection case by case as outlined in the July 27 Summary and Response document, Nelson Ob'iectigJL....::.._450"n..Keithson: Ron Nelson complimented staf f fOl: thei r summary of Kei thson Pond background, He asked if the estimated project costs reported this evening by Graham include easement acquisition on the Reiling property. Attorney Filla reported that the Reiling property . needed for the pond is currently involved in condemnation; the project costs reported this evening do not include any Reiling property acquisition costs. Graham added that the - . Arden Hills Council 5 August 31, 1992 total project costs of approximately $45,500 given this evenin9 include approximately $34,000 for construction and 30% for overhead (administration, legal, etc.) . Ron Nelson contended that his property is not benefitted in that it wi 11 not become more valuable as a result of the proposed Keithson Pond project. He stated he has not received answers to his satisfaction, that he was told when purchasing his home that the pond would be developed and therefore assumed the cost to develop an adequate pond was included in the cost of his home. He asked why the City released the developer's performance bond and why the nearby townhomes are not being assessed since some of their drainage contributes to Keithson Pond. Attorney Filla reiterated that Council 1) Established a maximum per lot assessment of $1,500 based upon the City appraiser's information that $1,500 was supportable; and 2) Determined what percentage each lot contributes drainage to Keithson Pond, based on the City Engineer's analysis of topography. . Ron Nelson stated that his basis for argument is that the pond existed when he purchased his home and he assumed it was adequate. He added that when he moved in to the home, the street was straight, but in time, the grade of the street changed to such a degree that a catch basin had to be relocated. Regarding the townhomes, Graham explained the townhomes have their own large pond which collects drainage from the townhomes. He added that he did review the topography and found townhome property run-off is collected in its own pond. Regarding assumptions made by residents when purchasing their homes, Filla stated that typically a home purchase incl udes a "package" of improvements, but there are other types of improvements which can affect property. He reiterated that the City appraiser has opined that a maximum $1,500 assessment per lot is supportable for Keithson Pond improvements in that affected properties would receive that amount of economic benefit from the project. He reminded residents that an off-site drainage management system does benefit a property in that the property need not collect all its own run-off on site. . Attorney added that if this matter goes to court, he is :;~ ,:1 " comfortable that appraisal information is correct within 5 - ',I 10%. He reminded those residents who may potentially be ~ .~ assessed that the City at large is paying the lion's share 1 of the project. He stated that from a legal standpoint, I Arden Hills Council 6 August 31, 1992 . storm sewer improvements are dif fi cuI t to handle in court, Regarding the release of performance bond, Fi 11 a explained that typically the City has a list of items which must be accomplished to the satisfaction of the City Engineer before a performance bond can be released. In the case of Keithson Pond, that list did not specifically include drainage and grading, At the completion of the development, the engineer recommended releasing the performance bond on the basis that the items on the list were satisfactor:ily accomplished. Graham stated that un t il this evening he was not aware that there had been any changes in street grade. Rocheleau Oblection - 4503 Keithson: Rainer Rocheleau, 4503 Keithson Drive, commented that he does not believe this project will benefit his property. Attorney Fi 11 a replied that the City Council has determined that the Rocheleau property should be assessed at 100% of the maximum supportable lot assessment of $1,500. Crimmins Obiect(on - 4509 Keithson: Jean Crimmins commented that when the inlet was installed, her property was altered and damaged by negligent lack of action by the . City. She added that the City also is negligent in allowing so much time to pass before responding to residents' concerns. Attorney Filla replied that the City has been working toward resolution for some time; . with regard to pursuing the developer, Council has taken the position that to do so '.;ould likely only add legal costs to the project with little chance of recovering any of the costs. Attorney Filla noted that Crimmins' had previously registered an objection on the basis that they understood there was money allocated to pay for this improvement, He stated that there has not been money allocated for this improvement and t.o {iis know1 PiJ9t~ f trl2 City has not given such information to residents, He added that even in situatjons where money has been allocated for an improvement project, the City is allowed to assess as long as there is supportable benefit to residents. Jean Crimmins commented that Rice Creek Watershed District and the former City engineering consultant should be held re~.ponsibl e for approving the inadequate drainage and releasing bonds. She added that she does not consider the Keithson Pond project an "improvement" project, Attorney Filla reiterated that drainage/grading plans were . not on the original list of accomplishments t'equi red prior to the release of performance bond. He further stated that all required improvement were completed to the City - . Arden Hills Council 7 August 31, 1992 Engineer's satisfaction and he recommended releasing the bond, which the City did. Jean Crimmins summarized her objection that the City and Rice Creek watershed District was negligent by releasing the bond and approving an unacceptable drainage plan, they were further negligent by not addressing the issue in a timely fashion, and further negligent by allowing the crimmins property to erode. She added that some of the townhome property drains through the Nelson and Horwath parcels and therefore should be assessed. Horwath Obiection - 4510 Keithson: Filla referred to the Horwath's objection outlined in the July 27 Summary and Response document, wherein the Horwaths contend they paid a share of development cost with the purchase of their property and their property does not abut the pond improvement and therefore will not benefit. Filla explained that water run-off from the Horwath property eventually runs to Keithson Pond, so there is a benefit. He . added that from the very beginning, it was understood by the City that the existing pond was not designed or intended to be a complete drainage system; the design clearly showed there would be a need for a downstream drainage system sometime in the future. Nancy Horwath asked how many times residents would have to pay; what would happen if Keithson Pond, after improved is still inadequate, or if the Reiling property is developed. Graham explained that if the Reiling property were developed, the developer would be required to adequately address drainage. Filla added that per the City assessment policy, a property can only be assessed once for any given assessment, but special assessments can be levied up to the ~ amount of benefit. He said if it can be proven that a . property has received benefit, the City has the right to assess. Lawrence Obiection - 4516 Keithson: Kurt Lawrence contended that the proposed assessments are illegal because the properties involved are not receiving benefit and certain properties (such as the townhomes and the Reiling property) are not proposed to be assessed. Filla stated that in order to assess, the City must prove equitable assessment to similarly situated properties; in his opinion that has been done. . Kurt Lawrence commented that the Keithson Pond project is not an "improvement" project but rather something being done to protect the ~ity from liability, so other funding sources ; should be sought. Filla replied that this project is not J .1 Arden Hills Counci 1 8 August 31, 1992 . being done to side step any liability issue, but rather this project was always intended. Regarding the issue of funding the project, Filla reminded that the City at large will pay the majority of the project and there are no other known means. Filla added that if the City did pursue the developer, anything recovered could theoretically be applied to the City's portion rather than decrease individual assessments. Kurt Lawrence said the developer, at one time, planned to improve the pond, but the City said it was not needed. Graham stated that not having been involved at that time, he does not know what actually took place. Fi 11 a stated that the City has never said this pond or the pond outlet was not needed. Councilmember Hicks added that in conversing with the former City engineer, they also have no recollection of discouraging the developer from improving the pond. Dick Foster explained there was once a pIpe from the street to the old pond which was removed, Ma,gs.rs!Tredal Obiection - 4521 Keithson: Hark Hagel's stated that in 1989, he called the former engineer and Mayor Sather to review the concerns of the Keithson properties; several meetings took place, but the developer had no plan to . address the problems then; now the developer is no longer involved and more time has elapsed. He said that when the City Engineer released the bond, the drainage issue was not resolved. Fi 11 a commented that an outlet to the Reil ing property was always intended and now the City is taking action to obtain the easement for the ou tl e t through condemnation proceedings. Filla added that Rice Creek Watershed District approved the drainage plans assuming an outlet would be added sometime in the future. Toni Tredal said she has a copy of the Rice Creek Watershed D~strict permit spelling out the conditions the developer was requi.;:ed t.o meet, but the developer did not complete any or the conditions, She st.ated that she is offended by Councilmember Hicks earlier comment.s beca\l;;e Magers/Tredal have spent very much time trying to deal with this ma t t e;: , p, n d~_t:~Qll_.nJ2i?~.tj.s~~-=_ 4522 Keithson: James Anderson asked why t.he Reiling property is not proposed to be assessed_ Graham stated that the Reiling property is adequate to hold i.ts C:"...Jfl drainage, part of the pond is locat.ed on the Reiling property, and Mr. Reiling has not granted an easement or donated his property to contain drainage from other properties Foster Ob'iection - 4527 Keithson: Dick Foster commented . that the Reiling property drains more into the pond than any other property in the area. He questioned whether the City ;.!t . Arden Hills Council 9 August 31, 1992 is bargaining with Mr. Reiling. Filla stated that so far there has been no negotiation with Mr. Reiling to make a trade of assessment for property or any similar agreements. Filla stated that it is the City's hope that the layout of the pond will benefit the Reiling property to a degree that Mr. Reiling may cooperate and the City can reduce its exposure to compensate Reiling for intrusion on his property. Filla added that if the Reiling property were to be assessed, assessment hearings would need to be reconducted. Filla referred to Dick Foster's objection in the Summary and Response document that if the Reilin9 property had been developed at the same time as the Keithson development, the cost of this improvement would be less. Filla commented that this may be true, but Mr. Reiling did not wish to develop his property at that time. Dick Foster commented that if the City had taken action a few years ago by digging the existing pond deeper, problems could have been corrected then. Filla reiterated that Mr. . Reiling has never agreed to grant an easement to allow the City to do so; if he had, the City would have taken action earlier. Fi 11 a added, however, that assessments would have been supportable in that scenario. Hill Obiection - 4528 Keithson: Regarding Hills objection on the premise that this project benefits the entire community, Filla stated he agreed and that is why the City at large will be absorbing such a large share of the costs. He added that certain properties, those proposed to be specially assessed, receive additional benefit. Giel Obiection - 4534 Keithson: Teresa Giel stated her comments have already been answered this evening, but she was offended by some Council comments earlier this evening. Lawyer Obiection - 4539 Keithson: Filla stated this objection has already been covered this evening. stennes Obiection - 4540 Keithson: Filla referred to stennes' objection that the majority of the stennes property does not drain into the pond and therefore does not receive benefit. Filla explained that Council determined that 25% of the stennes property drains to Keithson Pond, therefore the owner would be assessed 25% of the maximum supportable per lot assessment. ~; . 11 ,;I Attorney Filla recommended that the July 27, 1992 Summary :i *1 and Response document and the videotape recording of this f;t evening's meeting be preserved for at least 90 days. The i public hearing was closed at 9:47 p.m. ------ Arden Hills Council 10 August 31, 1992 . Councilmember Hicks asked about the accuracy of topographical maps. Graham stated that in his experience they are very accurate and it is common to determine drainage using topographical maps, which is what was done in this case. Hicks asked how costly it would be to survey each individual property involved. Graham said surveying would likely cost about $100 per hour, so it would be quit e expensive to survey all properties. Councilmember Malone thanked City Attorney Filla and the residents for patiently working through the hearing this evening on this complex, multi-faceted Issue. He asked Graham if the catch basin in the street was actually moved as reported this evening by residents. Graham stated he was not aware of that until this evening. Ron Nelson and Ron Horwath stated that the catch basin was moved from the Crimmins driveway area to a location by the pond. Nelson said streets were paved in July 1987 when he moved in to his home. Councilmember Mahowald said he ' . that everyone has appreCJaces toned down discussions this evening. He apologized for the Summary and Response document not being sent out to residents as instructed. He stated that the City lS . accepting a large portion of responsibility for this project by accepting the lion's share of project costs; it would have been easier to accept 100% of costs, but it would not be fair to the general taxpayer to do so. He said the City has been seeking a solution since this matter came to the forefront and he understands that assessed residents may not be satisfied with being assessed, but the assessments are appropriate. MOTION: Hicks moved, seconded by Mahowald, to adopt Resolution No. 92 - 41 Adopting the Final Assessment Roll for the 1992 Keithson Area Pond Improvement, with assessments as established by Council on July 13, 1992 as follows: tJ.sse::.,srnents are to be run over a Ii ve year period and calculated on the basis of 100% being equal to $1,500 per lot, lOO~. benefi t ($1/500 assessment) to lots '.' WI (~..i. addJcesses 4527 , 4521, 4509, 4503 Keithson Drive; 509,:. benefit ($750 asst=':ssment) to lots with addresses 4504, 45101 4516, 4522, 4528, 4534, 4539 Kej ~-- :1:::; OJl Dricv~ .: 2596 benefi t ($375 ~C'C'~c<'='meD+') to lot 'wi th adclr es s --:l._-~'G,_''-'. . ll- 4540 Keithson Drive, Motion carried unanimously (5 ,0) , . ii . Arden Hills Council 11 August 3l, 1992 UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS ACCEPT BID INFORMATION ARDEN PLACE STORM SEWER Engineer Graham advised that three bids were received and opened on August 27, 1992 for Arden place storm Sewer Improvements. He added that bidders were asked to provide bids for reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) or high density plastic pipe (HDPE) . Graham recommended the use of HDPE and stated that the lowest bid received was from Ro-So Contracting, Inc. in the amount of $26,048. He stated that he has experience working with Ro-So Contracting and would be comfortable awarding the bid to them, however, Council may wish to conduct the assessment hearing before awarding the bid. Council was further advised that the Public works Department, upon the direction of Council, arranged for a contractor to make one final attempt to unclog the existing . Arden place drainage pipe, however, they were met with resistance from Ray Johnson, the property owner at 1540 Arden Place, who refused to allow access to his property. Council was provided a copy of a letter dated August 28, 1992 from Mr. Johnson's attorney. Councilmember Malone commented that the Arden place drainage issue is a sensitive situation, and although residents have approached the City for relief, he questions whether this is a City problem or a private property problem. Mayor Sather added that the City has attempted to correct the existing clogged pipe, and the residents do have a problem, so the City needs to take some kind of action. Councilmember Growe agreed that not taking some kind of action would likely mean this issue would haunt the City later. Councilmember Mahowald stated that the City needs to take action regardless of who caused the problem. He suggested waiting until the City appraiser determines whether there would be benefit to residents if a storm sewer project is done. MOTION: Hicks moved, seconded by Mahowald, to accept all bids in the matter of Arden Place Storm Sewer Improvements. Motion carried unanimously (5-0). . , MOTION: Hicks moved, seconded by Mahowald, to order the ! preparation of the proposed assessment roll, and schedule a public hearing to be held September 28, 1992 {. at 7:30 p.m., in the matter of Arden place Storm Sewer ..~ .,'L. Improvements. Motion carried unanimously (5-0). , . , i i " - Arden Hill s Council 12 August 31, 1992 . Councilmember Mahowald asked that the assessment process be clearly explained in the notices. Attorney Filla stated that individual notices would state the maximum potential assessment assuming the engineer's estimate of construction c os t s plus overhead, divided by the number of parcels. He added that the actual assessment can be less than the amount listed in the notice, but not more, and would be determined later according to the appraiser's opinion regarding benefit. Engineer Graham said about eight parcels are involved, Attorney Filla advised that if Counci 1 wishes to conduct the assessment hearing prior to awarding the project, it would be a tight schedule since bid prices are only good for 90 days. DISCUSSION - 1993 STREET IMPROVEMENTS Counci 1 reviewed a letter dated August 27, 1992 from Engineer Graham wherein Graham suggested Council consider the 1993 street rehabilitation and pavement majntenance program so that necessary feasibility studies and field information can be completed before inclement weather. Engineer Graham stated that current street ratings indicate . that t.he next two streets requiring reconstruction are Bussard Court (Snelling Avenue to the west cul-de-sac), and Dunlap Avenue (Ingerson Road to Cannon Avenue). Councilmember Mahowald commented that during preliminary budget discussions, it was Council consensus to concentrate on overlay and seal coating projects in 1993 due to limited funds and the fact that several projects were done in 1992. Councilmember Malone said that Council consensus does not preclude taking a look at Bussard Court and Dunlap Avenue. -" CH E DU L E TR U THIlL,Ti\ XP,Tl Q.NJiF,)"-RTliQ", Council reviewed Truth in Taxation ProIJisions from Ram;=:,-ey County Depdrtment. of Taxatl.on and Records Admi ni strati on, ar,d a memorandum from st.aff suggesting possible dates for t.he City's T::uth in Taxation publ ic fJearing, MOT ION: Halone moved, seconded by Growe, to schedule the City's Truth in Taxation public hearing for ;1onday, ',ovember 30, 1992 at 7:30, \-.,7i tb. a continuation hearing (if needed) c'n C'ecernbel- ''', 1992 -, 7:30. Hotio:n carried L... I O.\... unanimously (5-0), . , ' . Arden Hills Council 13 August 31, 1992 AUTHORIZATION TO EXTEND PUBLIC WORKS EMPLOYEE TERM OF EMPLOYMENT This agenda item was removed during adoption of agenda. APPROVE SALARY INCREASE FOR DEPUTY CLERK/ZONING ADMINISTRATOR Prior to this evening's regular agenda, during closed session! Counci 1 conducted a performance evaluation on Deputy Clerk Iago, MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Growe, to approve a salary increase for Deputy ClerklZoning Administrator Catherine Iago to Level 5 of the 1992 Pay plan effective September 3, 1992, and to terminate Ms. Iago's duties as Acting Clerk Administrator effective September 7, 1992. Motion carried unanimously (5-0), Council thanked Deputy Clerk Iago for her extra effort put forth in the last couple of months as Acting Clerk Administrator. . Councilmember Malone commented that it would be appropriate to take necessary action to create a City Administrator authority type government giving the newly appointed City Administrator broader authority. MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Hicks, to direct the City Attorney to draft an appropriate resolution creating broader City Administrator authority type of government. Motion carried unanimously (5-0). SCHEDULE COUNCIL WORKSESSION SEPTEMBER 8, 1992 MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Mahowald, to schedule a Council worksession September 8, 1992 at 4:00 p.m. Motion carried unanimously (5-0). Councilmember Hicks advised that he would be unable to attend the September 8 worksession. REQUEST FOR TENT SALE ZEOS COMPUTER FACTORY OUTLET Council reviewed an application from steve Larson, Manager . of the Zeos Computer Factory Outlet, requesting permission {;i '~ to erect two tents in front of the Zeos Computer Factory I Outlet store at 3787 North Lexington for use as advertisement and a snack bar for Zeos' sale from September 3 through 7, 1992. I I I , , Arden Hills Council 14 August 31, 1992 . staff recommended approval of the application contingent upon review of the application by the Fire Chief and Building Inspector to insure the tents meet code requirements. MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Growe, to authorize Zeos Computer Factory Outlet to erect two tents as outlined in their application, contingent upon review and approval by the Fire Chief and Building Inspector. Motion carried unanimously (5-0). MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL SUMMARY Councilmember Malone advised that the Finance Committee has worked very hard at put ting together the July 1992 Management Financial Summary and they would appreciate Council input on the su.mmary before the Finance Committee's September 24 meeting. COUNCIL COMMENTS PU_BJ,lc::._;:AFETY IWORKS COMMITTEE Referring to ,Jerry Miller's resignation accepted this . evening under the consent calendar, Councilmember Growe suggested a letter of thanks be sent to Mr. Miller for his work with the Public Safety/Works Committee. Council concu.rred. Growe added that Dick Roessler has volunteered to chair the Committee and he would be an asset in that capacity. MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Growe, to ratify the appointment of Dick Roessler as Chair- of the Public SafetylWorks Committee. Motion carried unanimously (5 -0) , ;~CKj'\TOHLEDGlvrENT DF ATTORNEY FIL~F~ Nith regard to tbe Keithson Pond drainage hearing conducted earlier +-'\...' evening, Councilmember- Mahowald thanked \-dlS ~Z':._ttcrney Filla fot' taking the ' C ' of spokesperson pOSlL-1On repi~~senting the City, cl earl y and calmly explaining t.he ci rC1.11TI:="tancp-s surrounding the issuer and helping maintain a , C ' exchange bet'..Jeen the City and the residents. POSIL-IVe ronnel1 conc"1:rrpr:1. . c:_.LTY LInGI'.TIQli At. At.t.Cilney Pi 11 a f s request, Council ITlet in closed for the . purpose of discussing City litigation, ----- ;ii"i , . . . Arden Hills Council 15 August 31, 1 992 ADJOURN Council reconvened at 10:40 p.m. MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Hicks, to adjourn the meeting at 10:40 p.m, Motion carried unanimously (5-0). Thomas R. Sather, Mayor Catherine Iage, Deputy Clerk NOTICE OF MEETINGS: The next Council worksession will be held September 8, 1992 at 4:00 p.m. at City Hall. The next regular Council meeting will be held September 14, 1992 at 7:30 p.m. at City Hall. . \ .1j . ,ll &1 /l I ~ I ., . CITY OF ARDEN JIILIS . ~ DATE: sept~N>r 10, 1992 'XU: Mayor and City council Dorothy A. Person, Clerk 1\dministrator FRCI!: Catherine J. Iaqo, Deputy Clerk/Zoning 1\dmini.strator ~ SUBJECl': status Report on Appraisals of the Harstad/City Hall sites and Arden Place Drainage Area Mr. Bill CUshman was contacted last week to begin the appraisals for the Harstad, city Hall sites and Arden Place Drainage Improvement area. Engineer Graham met with Mr. CUshman and gave him information regarding the properties affected by the improvement. Mr. CUshman was advised that it is llE'<JBfO'f'ary to expedite the appraisals. ACrION REOUIRED: Council should pass a motion authorizing the expenditure of $5,5000 to William CUshman for property appraisals for the Harstad, city Hall, and . the Arden Place Drainage Improvement sites. CJI/ts Attachments . AUG 31 '$2 11:50 ARA,LTD./STEVENSON-EDWARP~ P.l . , APPRAISAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, LTD. STEVENSON-EDWARDS & ASSOCIATES 2310 County Road D . New Brighton, Minnesota 55112 (612) 636-2565 FAX: (612) 633-0394 (612) 633-(r August 31, 1992 Cathy Iago CircOf Arden Hills . , -, 14 0 West Highway 96 Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112 Re: Phone conversation regarding appraisals Dear Ms. Iago: '-'0, We can provide the appraisals requested four to six weeks after you tell us to t ~~' " . proceed. The cost breakdown is as follows: ~"1. , l. Arden Hills City Hall $2,500 ,.:.~:,:.\tj J 2. Vacant land area 1,500 , 1 3. Arden Place (7-10 parcels - storm drainage) 1.500 f $5,500 \ Thank you for considering us for this work. i Sincerely yours, I ~~# ~d_'J 1 j I i William H. CUshman, MAl i Certified Federal General AKpraiser I Minnesota License #400163 . . CITY OF ARDEN JIILIS ~ DATE: september 10, 1992 'XU: Mayor and City council oorothy Person, Clerk JIdm; n; strator FRCI!: Catherine J. Iago, Deputy Clerk/zoning lldministrator ~ SUBJECT: 1992 Charitable Gambling Premises Permit '!he City is in receipt of an application for a new Class B Pull-tats premise permit at the Ramada North Hotel, 1201 W. COunty Road E, Arden Hills, from the Shoreview Arden Hills Lions Club, Inc. staff has reviewed the application for compliance to the Charitable Gambling Ordinance criteria, and has detennined the documentation requirements have been met and the application is eligible. REXXlMMENDATION: . staff recommends approval of the application suhnitted by the Shoreview Arden Hills Lions Club, Inc. ACTION RroUIRED: If council con=s with the recarmnendation, they should pass a Jrotion adopting Resolution No. 92-62, Approving Gambling Permit Application for Sh=eview Arden Hills Lions Club, Inc. for Class B Pull-tats at the Ramada North Hotel. CJI:lav M92-62 . . CITY OF ARDEN HILLS RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-62 RESOLUTION APPROVING CHARITABLE GAMBLING PREMISES PERMIT APPLICATION BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED, that the city of Arden Hills agrees to approve the premises permit for the Shoreview Arden Hills Lions Club, Inc. for Class B Pull-tabs operations at the Ramada North Hotel, 1201 W. County Road E, Arden Hills, Minnesota. Adopted by the Arden Hills City Council this 14th day of September, 1992. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF ARDEN HILLS Thomas R. Sather, Mayor ATTEST: . Dorothy A. Person, Clerk Administrator councilmember moved adoption of the foregoing resolution and the same was declared adopted upom unanimous yes vote of all members present. Witness my hand and seal of office at Arden Hills, Minnesota, this day of , 1992. . ;. )i: j , .~ , ".., Minnesota Lawful Gambling Premise Permit Application - Part 2 of 2 _.,..,- . .l&hmfifi~1~~allll[Blilifljy~f]f~fi_mrlt~iliililt\mf.(~1!litiif.!t~&mitI;11fm~I~.~f;tlfNiWt~gl~f.jj !J,;nk Na";" " " , '" , Bank Accounl Number" 111J.~It/J1e~/CIl fJAAJk /(r.x,t'!t!IUr; ~A/ ~t,f C>C/';7 Ban ddress City tate Zip ode Ili.llli!lif~.II'fl"W~_.~~"~~_III..lllttlM1MIlillllll: . ame ress I e -:ScFF;E~y I< &GI-IAJ .5' bD V/lJ/J at/da -:1/ /-/!U t. ,;Ok S/LJEdT G/f..R.y jV}t{/IIE-e/ll 671/() kfWAJA6/Nf-I /J/C ;:;:-;t!Ij)'-~Y J&f"/ /dq ~ ~&oAr{,E- fJtJJJmr=A /;)/<1' G"#LY//]/ -ST/~L .:;~;f;L/#4 /J/4JP Gambllng'slie AuthorkiiUon" .1 am the chief executive officer of the organization; I hereby consent that local law enforcement officers, the .1 assume full responsibility for the fair and lawful opera- board or agents of the board, or the commissioner of tion of all activ~ies to be conducted; revenue or public safety, or agents of the commissioners, .1 will familiarize myself with the laws of Minnesota may enter the premises to enforce the law. governing lawful gambling and rules of the board and Bank Records Information agree, H licensed, to abide by those laws and rules, The board is authorized to inspect the bank records of the including amendments to them; gambling account whenever necessary to fuHiII .any changes in application information will be submitted requirements of current gambling rules and law. to the board and local un~ of government w~hin 10 days . Oath of the change; and ' I declare that: .1 understand that failure to provide required information .1 have read this application and all information submitted or providing false or misleading information may result in to the board is true, accurate and complete; the denial or revocation of the iicense. .allother required information has been fully disclosed; Signal r<l0 I f xe utive officer Date I . ..... . 4. A CODY of the local unrt of aovernmenes resolution aD- 1. The crty '~must sign thiS appiicatlOn if the gambling prem- orovina this aoolication must be attached to this aooiication , ises is located ~!hincC<ity}imi!s:. " .. ,. ., . . . 5. If this application is denied by the. local un~ of government, j 'o;,\" 2., Jh~co~nty . ~~.~J~w,n~.bIPl1'.u"! SI9~ thlsappl~~'~~ H,;:, ~ s~o~ld ~ot be submitted to the Gambli,~g Cont~~IS.~ard. ."., i '. ,thegambllng premlseS,lSlOCatedwrthln.atownshlp'.'_""".",_"m.,. ,. ,,_. .., ,..".,,_., ,,'.', , 3.".>Th~ local u~~ governmen.t (city or co~nty) .must ~a~ a Township: By signature below, the township acknowledg~s I resolutIOn specifICally app~().vlng or denYing thiS application:. that the organization is appiying for a premises permit within j township limits. : i " ,ell *", .'or' Count ** Townshl ** I '.~~l.;~ . \'-' .,', . ',' ":co ' . ' Township, N,ame . . '^, .~;:,HJ >' '.',. _'.... _ .., ...;}',:\'._qJ'.':~:."'.'::-bC_J ..A~ ,:;' Signature of person rea3iving ~plication .i;;f ~'rf~i1rfr~"'1'r~!~I)i;~!!!f~1~11[~l~~~ilf;.i~'fl~ ,"B'OB ,,::::: ";Premise Permit Application _ Part 2 of 2 .imlli.ftf1:~mlfi1.&'~~.fi~<<jlr.mrlfffil~.tlllilf::1itfl"'.illi~41@itl4i1 Bank Name Bank Account Number I~Q lr/J1e~/cll 21Wk 1f.C413VILLr: {ZA/ cf!t:f P.!?/>7 Ban ddress ClIy tate Zip ode ;U./l./o II} FI1If(i//,c;W /ft/~ A&~f3't1LL~ >>1///', .=?5//~ ame ress I e -:f6FFiP.::.y I<. GGI-IAJ .P bD tllJ-N 13(/11611 ':?T ,tJ-rru t- ;01l'B$/.l}g4lT G/(/(Y !l1U/1/:;S/l! 67,/19 J{6IJA/A:5/iJA/ J);(, ;::-~/LJLC,v p7/'fs;;7 /,dq 0 i t!i€oA&:t:= /3p.JJm~j{ /;J/J 6"H,L)///)/ -sr/'*'L ,c,&11/1;VA/4 ...I.Y41fl, i 't Gambling,f)~te Authorization, ," ,."'.',, 'B' .' ',,1 amth,echief executiveofficarofthe organiziltion;i'" i I hereby consentthatlocaJ law enforcement officers, the .1 assume full responsibility for the fair and lawfui,opera-t board or agents of the board, or the commissioner of , ., ,tion of all activities to be conducted; , , ' , ,. 1- revenue or public s~fety, or agents of the con;miss!<>ners"lwill iamiliariz~ myself with th~ laws of Minnesota'.' t may enter the. premises to enforce.the law.' governing lawful gambling and r~les of the board and f Bank Records Information, , agree. 11 licensed, to abide by those laws and rules, r The boi'-rd is authorized to inspect the bank records of the' including amendments to them; ;l gan;~Ii~gllccount whenever n?cessary to fullill " , ., .any changes in ,application in)"r,!,ation will be sublTlitted " ,f requirements of current gambling rules and law. to the'board and local unit of government within 10?ays .I .oa!h.".", of the change; and, ,", ,,' '~ I declare that: ' .1 understand that failure to provide required informalion- .1 have read this application andall information submitted or providing false or misleading information may resuit in t to the board is true, accurate and complete; the denial or revocation of the license. { .all other required information has been fully disclosed; '~ Signat I'<l I f Xe utive officer Date I 1 i f'H'" , '7,," "WV"" ''m::*Y4?;t~l'mww'i'&; , ,.: '''<-&t~Atilli%WL''wt.Mfii?{@Wff.gWW.&''4tf&'9t1il I Jt:~, :':g!.Jl~;;::;~;; ~~~.:;;Jn!ri~~ll~jlgw~if.~li** .~~.::~' .'~:~ '. .': .~~_1furwi@~~t~:% i .... . .0."".7.."... .'. 4. "A coDv""of the local unit of aov~-r~ment,s resolution ao--" -- I .1. ,T~e c~y'lJl~s.'~lgn ~h's,ar;plicatlO~lfthEl galTlblingpr?m- orovina this aoollcation must be attached to this aoolication ' ~ .ses IS located w~hln City hm~s ' ,.,,", ,,,-,", h' "I'" 'B, 'd" "ed' b'th "10' 'I ~ "f 'l" t ~ ',' " --,c",..,',...., ..".'i'.',...,.,..,.,.....,..,.,,,,,,S.,,lft IS app Jcatlon IS em y e ca un.. 0 governmen. ,~ " " ,.2. The couiifV"AND towlishi .~ri'lljslSighlhis"~"Iic'a:ticin If. """""',' '<". '", "!!''',,,r' ,...,".'"..' ",'.<c '''; ," __,,,,,,, " ,r",,",' "', '," .' ,,"'\'W'~""~ , \ "~"~I "~,.J:l",-,,.,. ""'~ . ,", ',"'"'' ',';' ~ should,nolbesu,bmitted,, to t,)1e,Gambli~g COntn;>1 Bo, ard~ p" , ,-,'~',:~--...- .. .., "<:.'''.::l.'';'~_'_-'-.l '_..;\\,-.>.~~'-..-"r;.'-'.'.',.,'.-.,..'._."..- ',..'.._~'\:_~;.".',..,\:~.._ ''I'' '''',_' ,0 - '\' '_'_,,'" ~\:..'<= .. ",' ,"" ,the"gambIIQgprElmISeSJsJOOaled"",,~hlnca~ownS)1p._~ "~~'"=~"""";"'___~"-'''\''__-~,,,,>r,__.$_.\);}..\_.\,\.,.\lSc, ' ,.'" ',''',. 3:rC;Th~r&at u~~governnien.t (cltYorco.Uhly) .m~st ~as~a'~,) 'jO~-@~hIP?~lsi9~a';u~e 'li~rO';".thetoivnship;;"knowledges ~ reso,lutl,?!! ~P".?lf"'.""yappr~vJngorde~y!.ng1h,~~ llPPI~t\o~:, ; that the organization is applying for a premises permit within\: ' , township limits. '. ". . ~' ~.~ .~ '~". " .. . ~ " ~ .,<:: ~, , - -- '----..- -_..,-- .--.." ----y)------..-, "-.. ------".",,-..,.. . , >\ ,- ~j ~ \ ,-I j''''' V'lIT, II , , I . \'~j ;,\ \.: <. U .~) Iii' C (' .... -.~>. .... , I ..---- -----------_.~--~---- . . ------- - /J . - ~\ fun, n, t, 1_____) _ .. ,)" , ....I"'" ,I ",.. , .. . -- Sh9Itt." ?~/[ .:~t,' h,..~:>''l-/v ;""^: /~- c:._';. '''-..., /r\ l/c/)5 L! !.t1/"j .... I 8oc7fi /!ltt,4 , , ;;, / Sri Fr ?' ~~ w, , , ) ~,m, I ,'; - I, ~- l) <(_...m '" ,.'_~ ----/,;' 1 _~:::~._.n ,-- / / "- . f(ft1}1ft/JIt- Yt7J!TfI HI/let 't CoA/,FE/e4fC!5 cev/E,,( /:2 0/ W, co, t. '/) E, - /f!il)t5rJ IIN-t oS) /-II A.J .5!P / /;;. ,;; . CITY OF ARDEN JIILIS ~ DATE: September 11, 1992 'XU: Mayor and City council Dorothy A. Person, Clerk 1ldministrator FRCM: catherine J. Iago, Deputy Clerk (}1 SUBJECT: Bingo Hall License - Arden Hills Bingo Hall (Pot 0' Gold) Attached is a bingo hall license application from Robert Grootwassink to operate Arden Hills Bingo Hall (Pot 0' Gold), 3776 Connelly. Mr. Walsh has sold his interest in the hall to Mr. Grootwassink, therefore, this is classified as a "new" license. RECnlMEMJATION: staff recommends that this application be approved as requested. ACrION REOUIRED: . If council concurs with the staff recommendation, they should pass a motion, under Consent, approving the bingo hall license application as requested, pending approval of Ramsey county Sheriff's Deparbnent. CJI/lav Attachment M92-63 . CITY OF ARDEN HILLS . RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-63 RESOLUTION APPROVING BINGO HALL LICENSE APPLICATION BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED, that the City of Arden Hills agrees to approve the Bingo Hall License Application for the Arden Hills Bingo Hall (Pot O'Gold) from Mr. Grootwassink at 3776 Connelly, Arden Hills, Minnesota. Adopted by the Arden Hills city council this 28th day of September, 1992. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF ARDEN HILLS Thomas R. Sather, Mayor ATTEST: . Dorothy A. Person, Clerk Administrator Councilmember moved adoption of the foregoing resolution and the same was declared adopted upon unanimous yes vote of all members present. witness my hand and seal of office at Arden Hills, Minnesota, this 28th day of September, 1992. . FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Fee Oate_ LG300 Chk Initial I (Aev.101'3Cr190) Minnesota Lawful Gambling License # . Bingo Hall License Application - Part 1 (See instructions for completion ofthls application) Is this application for a new license, or a renewal? 0New 0 Renewal ~f.:r1!0!!~~~itftlgl\tl&gl~liiil~\1}iljMl&%f~ilfujlJM:~lft!litlifi!!jtt}lij;!iil!iW~$11jl~1!};i!J!1![111\11~1!j1\~]~ri;11j;jliljll1;jl:l!ljli;ill11!11il;'j;jlijll 1. County (where hall is located) 2. Mailing address of bingo hall City ~l/<; 3 :7)7 b /'~#/P/~v A-dtP// M4/" 1;"'<;-// 'J 3. Is the bingo hall located within city limits? Yes [g] No CJ If "No," indicate township in which bingo hall is iocated .!f1r~lif'.I!l~~.II!'i~~I~ll€<<!~Y~l~'!!I!~I1.nl~li!I~gi1!l~lfll1!il~;lj}\lilli!ji\!li!i~1!jl[ig!!Jjii~jl!;illijlll!Jljiljj!lj~lll 4, Name oflegalgwner of bingo h~ property Phone Ll- S. -0 rtl,;tJ Business Mail g Address State , J' 5. Names of all owners, officers, lrectors, partners, managers and supervisors (each person named must fill out a separate Bingo Hall Personnei Information form, LG315 and Affidavit, LG316) a.tfj,ht7r1- t: J.>tfJt:if,/R<<:",-4-I'f, k. b. g. I. . c. h, m, d. i. n. e, j, 0, lWml.B1Im41~1,~11%.illli.~1.ttlllf..{i~il%lllltlitll!r~1Iltill~f~~1~lfiilfl*~'w.l111111I!f!1~ilil 6,' ){V $~4-..>"l L(5'e. ,07<.:IO:if I I Sole proprietorship I I Partnership I X I Corporation A: L ;f/ ljlm!msl~m~'l..iwl!.flW1f4Itl.$t\lillrftillIl11l1fjflflwR.f.'~ll;liliw*[lftil1j1{ 7. Have/do any persons listed in items 4 and 5: Yes No a. been convicted of a felony? D ~ b, eVer been convicted of a crime involving gambling? D .kJ ; c. ever held a bingo hall license previously in Minnesota? D "0 d. oWe delinquent taxes in excess of $500 as defined in Minnesota Statutes section 270.72? D ~ e. ever been convicted of assault, criminal violation involving the use of a firearm, or making D ~ terroristic threats? f. after demand, not filed tax returns required by the Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue? D !kJ . 8. Are any of the individuals listed in items 4 or 5, or a person hoiding a financial or managerial interest in the bingo hall, or affiliate thereof _ D 1kI . a licensed distributor or'affiliate of the distributor under section 349.161? . a licensed manufacturer or affiliate of the manufacturer under section 349.163? D tzg . an affiliate of a Wholesale distributor of alcoholic beverages? n txl lG315 Minnesota Lawful Gambling I"'v, ('0011001 Bingo Hall Personnel Information lillngm:i!~]~Dll:.l!]1P:~1!tll.\l.l~ilil.lill.Nlitliilll.lj,i~mJf:1~j!lm;;l%:!ilill~jl;!i;I;;:!;lji;j!!;;;;jj\ljj;; 1, Name :;"n9o hall Phone A-J.-o V Mil B//j/,,?jj M./I ~/,;{) b 31 /7 d4 Address , City State Zip code . 57 ?i (c,Vva<4 ,4;..( ,4-/r'/Or;;;~ ,#/// ;-S-I/ ,:1- rl.i~!$.~!I~;ai;f'li~1il.ll;!1f:j];i;1;ll1j~llrl1ijjjJljl~~lljtlj!im!!;'i:tllfgjllj1jlitljlg{jfj~1;;i!jjj!1!!llli!;!!ll;!!!!;!l!;!;;!i!;;l;!!!:l';';!l; 2. Last Name First Name,/- Full Middle Name I Previous or maiden name 0. v 3, ';X~-J.I- Dates of Service U.S. Citizen If no, fill in re istration number: 6, Your position with bingo hall (check one) 0 Sole Proprietorship C Director o Partner g Corp. OHicer Work phone(,6IJ,) '153/9/760 Your du ies:! /11' cT 7, Employment record for past 10 years (include periods of unemployment 0 Employer Address Type of Business Position Held Dales at Employmenl Sp/J:- ~/,,!I/ ,1l1nh,".i ,j",..s~ "/I'{-~'""?w,vr/lr JVfl 4~fR' ::::::/ . /-;(1/< -41v J:"~.J./5<- rn o;..r,I'''';/- YI? -4/,0,,& ',,:;,,:-1,,, ,I...; 1'0 ~ ' 8. Place of residence for past 10 years AddrBss City State Zip code Dates of Residence . 15'.3 S'7 b;/~p~Ih".I";k M-v ,/'YP//-';.I -0//// -i;~<?L./. 7 /777' 9, Criminal history statement (except petty misdemeanors), If none, write "none." Dale ChaIge Ci:y and State Disposition ~tP .?"e 1 O. Name, address, and license or exemption # of any organization you be'ong to which conducts lawful gambling, ff none, write "none." Organization license or Exemption Number ~ 1!9 Y t::/____ ' Address City State Zip Code Organization license or Exemption Number Address Ciry State Zip Code ~?t~mtW~Wffitft!ltml'atWii$1wlfkiltirtl{![imW%J1W~ft$~~lm*%'~~~fW@IGIW~i&#Sf~W*m~IUJTI~:tNili~~~@I~f~f~~}1[!~f:@U~WI~W11t!f:~~ill I dedare that this application is Ct1rrecl and romp/elB to rhe best of my ,(,now/edge and beRel. I understand that false and misleading answers are grounds lor denial of Pcense (X :eKlcatJon 01 any licenses granted. . Yo;;::j#-e _dJ~;6;A-d/;:L ~~9- /~~2 I Attach this form to Bingo Hall Personnel Affidavit, lG316 Mail to: Department of Gaming. Gambling Control Division Rosewood Plaza South, 3rd Floor 1711 W. County Road B Rosevllle, MN 55113 Minnesota Lawful Gambling Bingo Hall License Application (LG300) - Part 2 . I declare that this application is correct and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief, I will familiarize myself with the laws of the state of Minnesota and rules of the Board regarding gambling and agree, if licensed, to abide by those laws and rules, including amendments to them. Changes in the information submitted in this application will be submitted to the Board and local government unit within ten days after the change occurs, 9, Signature 01 chiel ecutive oHice of the lessor Date Name (please print) Title ~ 9 -9'- /f.. /. -vd ;;--e-5 10. Name of person completing this form Ti~e Phone ( ) 1. The c~y' must sign if the bingo hall is located w~hin city limits. 2. The county" AND township"'must sign if the bingo hall is located within a township. 3. The local government (city or county) must pass a resolution specifically approving or denying the application, 4, A copy of the resolution approving the application must be attached to the application, 5, An application which is denied by the local governing body should not be submilted to the Gambling Control Division. Township By signature below, the township acknowledges that the organiza~on is applying for a bingo hall license within township limits. Ci!Y' or County" Township" 11. City or county name 12. Township name . Signature of person receiving application Signature of person receiving application Title Date received Title - Township offidaJ Date received Name of person delivering application to local government Is township? organized unorganized unincorporated D D D fi~I~IB:~lr~J1iI.~tftt!t~1!i1gil!lm~1l1illi~~~ltItlti~ft~lm~!~lillt1~i1t~i~~rl~@Iii~i1i~~i1Nltf.~~~!ili . Form LG300, 8ingo Hall License Application, Parts 1 and 2 . Form LG302, Bingo Hall Occasion List . Form LG315, Bingo Hall Personnel Information (for each person listed in ~em 4 and 5 on form LG300) . Form LG316, Bingo Hall Affidavit, (for each person listad in ~em 4 and 5 on form LG300) . Check for license fee of $2,500, made payable to "State of Minnesota" ii~~IYrJIIi.!t)~iitml~qIigilml:a~~lil%1fintitt}?1fmlt~11il~~~ltjlft~~~lit11t:iftillt~~l~i~~ Department of Gaming Gambling Control Division Rosewood Plaza South, 3rd Floor 1711 W. County Road B Roseville, MN 55113 . LG316 Minnesota Lawful Gambling (tal3ana) Bingo Hall Personnel Mfidavit STATE OF k/I/JY'<' 5oJ.-/( ) AFFIDA VIT OF OUALlFICA TION . } S.s. FOR BINGO HALL LICENSE COUNTY OF /1-1 J?/7( y:'/ ~ ) AND CONSENT STATEMENT (Pursuant to Minnesota Slat ute 349,164) I, E/;/'") /JJ- 1l tNo0/,~c./;;j, , under oath state that: (type or print) 1. I have not been convicted of a felony. 2. I have never been convicted of a crime involving gambling, 3, I do not owe delinquent taxes in excess of $500 as defined in Minnesota Statute section 270,72, 4, I am not a licensed distributor or affiliate of a distributor under section 349.161. 5. I am not a licensed manufacturer or affiliate of a manufacturer under section 349,163. 6, I am not a wholesale distributor of alcoholic beverages. 7. I will not provide any staff to conduct or assist in the conduct of any lawful gambling on the premises, 8. I will not acquire. provide storage control or inventory controi, or report the use of any gambling equipment used by an organization that conducts iawful gambling on the premises. 9. I will not provide accounting services to any organization conducting lawful gambling on the premises, 10. i will not solicit, suggest, encourage or make any expenditures of gross receipts from lawful gambling of an organization. . 11. I will not charge a fee to a person without which the person could not playa bingo game or participate in another form of lawful gambling on the premises, 12, I will not provide assistance or participate in the conduct of lawful gambling on the premises, 13, I will not prepare bingo packets. In addition, I understand, agree and hereby irrevocably consent that suits and actions relating to the subject matter of the attached bingo hall license application, or acts or omissions arising from such application, may be commenced against me in any court of competent jurisdiction in Minnesota by service on the Minnesota Secretary of State of any summons, process or pleading authorized by the laws of Minnesota, By signature of this document, the undersigned authorizes the Department of Public Safety to conduct a background check or review and to share the results with the Lawful Gambling Control Board, Failure to provide required information or providing false or misleading information may result in the denial or revocation of the license. FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT, except that this Affidavit and Consent Statement are submitted in support of the application for bingo hall license application from the Lawful Gambling Control Board. Subscribed and sworn to before me this d~~~;L~ (Signature of applicant - Bingo Hall Personnel) , 4nj, # /It lis /3; /f/;~; /1,// Name of Bingo Hall . 0/'5 ;)rd-tj-q~ Bingo Hall License Number My commission expires . . CITY OF ARDEN HILLS e RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-64 RESOLUTION CLARIFYING PROPOSED SUMS OF MONEY TO BE LEVIED FOR LEVY YEAR 1992 PAYABLE IN 1993 BE IT RESOLVED by the Arden Hills City council that the following proposed sums of money be levied for levy year 1992, payable in 1993 upon taxable property in said City of Arden Hills for the following purposes: General Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,481,472 Aerial Platform Ladder Truck . . . . . . . 82,460 certificate of Indebtedness Capital Equipment Program #1 . . . . . . . 26.068 $ 1,590,000 PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS THIS 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1992. . THOMAS R. SATHER, MAYOR ATTEST: DOROTHY A. PERSON, CLERK ADMINISTRATOR . --- ------ . CITY OF ARDEN JIILIS e MDDU\NOOM DATE: sept-""" 10, 1992 'XU: Mayor, City council and DOrothy Person, Clerk 1\dministrator EiQ(: @ Terry Post, City AccoUntant stlBJECl' : Budget Impact of Information Received SUbsequent to Revisions FraIl Budget WorkseSsion #3 (9/2/92 MEmJ) since my 912192 Memo documenting revisions from b.Jdget worksession #3 was issued, additional financial infonnation has been received that inpacts the preliminary Wdget the City will be certifying to the County Auditor on 9/15/92. NEW DATA FRCM RAMSEY COUNTY: 1. Fiscal Disparities A total of $123,100 was previously estimated, of wtUch $115,000 was directed to the General Fund. '!he upjated COUnty estimate is $120,481, of wtUch $112,250 will be receipted to the General Fund. '!he net inpact to the . General Fund is a revenue reduction of $2.750. 2. HACA A total of $77,600 was previously estimated, of which $75,000 was directed to the General Fund. '!he upjated CtRllTty estimate is $79,149, of wtUch $73,745 will be receipted to the General Fund. '!he net inpact to the General Furxl is a revenue reduction of $1.255. 3. Recvcli.no' SOJRE Grant A total of $18,920 was previously estimated. '!he upjated COUnty estimate is $19,449. '!his revision has no ilnpact on the General Furxl and only inpacts the Recycling Enterprise Fund (#603). '!he 1993 proposed General Fund revenue has been reduced by a net $4005 as a result of the Fiscal Disparities and HACA upjates referred to above. As the General Fund was previously showing a $6 surplus for 1993; these updates now put the General Furxl into a $3999 deficit condition. ~ON 'XU ELIMINATE 1993 poorosED DEFICIT staff advises increasing the 1993 certified and Tax levies by $4000 to overcome the projected deficit. '!he inpact of this change would be to show a 3.94% certified levy increase ($1,590,000 vs. $1,529,678) over . 1992 and a .34% Tax levy increase ($1,390,370 vs. $1,385,696) over 1992. e P1lGE 'nI) !lUJJl>J:i"J: IMP1\C1' MEMO This Certified I2vy percentage increase is within the eouncil guideline to keep such increase less than 4%. DELINQUENCY ASSUMPI'IONS It appears that the two JroSt critical assurrq;>tions :i1npacting the 1993 General Fund bJdget are the degree to which current ad valorem taxes and HACA will be collected. TO document the assurrq;>tions used a "Delin;auency Analysis" schedule is attached for your review. As you will note, the planned delin;auencies of $124,770 (7.86% of the certified Levy) appear aggressive with respect to prior years b.1dgets and actual experience. However, the 50% reserve for HACA ($40,000) appears prudent given the collection history of this state aid. 'Iherefore, the aggressiveness or optimism in the delin;auency assurrq;>tion arises from the 4.89% rate used for current property tax collections. Historically, this would be a conservative rate for the City. But in the last two years, the rates have been 9.26% (1991) and 7.00% (1992 est). If the 1993 collection experience parallels the 1992 estimate, . the revenue shortfall may be approxiInately $20,000. 'Il1e alternatives to offset this risk include: - Reducing expenditures $20,000 to create a planned 1993 surplus of $20,000. - Not being as conservative in reserving HACA. Moving $20,000 frOlll planned HACA into property tax reserve would result in anticipating to collect 75% of HACA instead of the current 50%. - Evaluating if 1991 & 1992 collection experience was an aberration frOlll historical trends or the beginning of a new benchmark level. - Incr"easing the certified I2vy by $20,000 (a 5.25% increase) to create a planned surplus of $20,000. - F:in:ting additional revenue sources (i.e., increasing various penni.t or license fees). Exploratory work in this area is currently being researched by a SUbcommittee of the Finance Committee. staff reconunendation is to be less conservative on HACA receipts while also anticipating a higher level of penni.t/license revenue based upon price increases. 'Ihe:i1npact of these two revenue sources should mitigate any further reduction of expenditures or increase in the Certified I2vy. MARKEr VAllJATION FOOINOI'E . During the b.1dget worksession process, there was some anticipation on e P1lGE THREE BllDGE1' IMP1\CT MEMO behalf of council that the estimated 1993 Market Valuation would show a modest increase. However, information supplied by Ramsey County (see attached) indicates a .05% decrease ($470,742,500 to $470,495,600) in total market valuation and a 4.84% decrease ($11,134,617 to $10,595,922) Total Tax Capacity after Fiscal Disparities iIrq;lact. I will be present at the September 14, 1992 Council meeting to discuss any issues raised in this roemo and to be a staff resource as the adoption of the 1993 Preliminary Budget is deliberated. TRP:rk . . . " C 11"1 e:x:: An.,D.e-J HlI..I,S_ .,_ !"Ii,,' ! "" CAMBR!CGE' 06-!.-)Nf""I~$-lC>f --.8.N Bl.. '\~ 1 S. ~ -,""":C~" 58246 '!.w(- i . ~p!o'le~ "y 1 2 3 J 5 " e \l{1. \ ,41. L- \ql1.~ _, '" \QT10,J p'\1\) ~cr IS",!) t::',. Pr..o%~f1) i I Ii II II . i i I II' II III I', I i 2 I. f~'\ ~Jl IClI. ~i " ' I " Ii, . I ! . .. ,'i ' . . 3 ' I I Iii II i, ! I,! IT I i I I l' 0 4 'c t~""II~~ 0., ,i i. 1 '2Q ~ I I \ >Z.~i7B 'I)'iC 000 5 "'IN. '" ',~ i I ! I Ii' 5 ..7ft> I I \':~ ~Io \$'(0;70 6 I ' I I '. I I I I ii, I' I'" I I ,i ' 71 " I' I [' Iii! II I I 8 0 l-l-ACA- 'I, 1-'- ,~! ,"" ~. I 'B 7"'l\f'\ 9 <b ~'II-O r&. 11/ 2D~b!\h I I I / III:; \I,z.."" ~lli\t ~ 101 i ii, I i II II I,! I i III i I II 1[ 11 O,~, no:. I;} 0 I 1\1.~'io/l> IT ;, .D~J ~:..:;2.'!~I. 1 t> ~, ' " ' , , "I Q ~ a-jir 12 l"l ,)'-,(. ~Y::<.J I l.k"CYo, ' 1\. ')'1'" ~..1 12 13 I I I I 'I i i I I I II i! Ii 1 1411 . Jt.-1SCIl-L O'SI ~ llli1 ....... ,\ B1 03'~, ~., ~51.. \0 b'-tO \10 ItSI 1 1511 s.. . ~ :J8' II I If IP>....... I I I t.. 1"'7 1~2."" ~ i , '..... 1 16! I! I i I! I , I I' I I.' I I ! II ,'I i I 1 r.' 17! O,^ \ :flf::! I, I I ,~ [1.% III. ,l 7% II. L\"tf1'( 1 18! I v~ 1!1--..... Lt:< '( I II I i, U1Q ! i ~l'lo', '~%.'.: 191 i II II I I I iT 'i I I ITr I I I ii, 1 20! . \.lArA 4-- f1 clt)hP. I i I II I', ! I i I i I I I II i '2 21 i I I I! II I I 'I Ll~1 i I I I i I i Iii 2 22 I i Uk cGJL"1'y ~ I' i ", I 3'70 I I , i . -\'7V(()! 1.. JIo% 2 23 Ol~ '"'I1W.. L.' T ' I "'1.- ~'(" i i Il ~Oo/n 3. '~2 , , I' !' I' 24 'i I ,I 'I I ' 2 251 I" .",. l ' Ii II I ill i, 12 261 " ""'uR.n1fN"r" Ai \I ~'I \ ~,' i,1 \ 124- Il.l;) od ~~~.lj 1'~bOO .,2 27 I ItLJ I i Ii) I 51;') II l.\.}~~b'" lJ" 'fW'i fi7f1f716'" 2 28; I I I, I Iii II Ii IIL2 29 ' O/~ " r~-- -\iItI . TZJ. '0 I. bil~ -~1'D ,. id1" U:.B90?o 2 30 <=1,., ~ L I " .~ ~ . ~1 ~1" . -"1 rb " 'Z. % r-" 60 Cfn '. 31 i ' i I .' I , ill 'I Ii!: 32 . rn-A ~ I ~ I I I I! I I ." 33' ", S.tl/cOC' -J'.,ft; I ~ < ' . ii' '., I!. '. 13 34 I II I ! 3 35 II -\-\l\CA 1 1,; ~ i I I I i 00 ~ 12..;.. . 0 : 36 l=;reAL () 5 ~ I ~... V) " : 1 1.47 c} i I, IN 0 : . 37 ' M\lAI '~ I '., iZ.!.~o '. ,~L' 'J ~ B:]~ ~ i7.)O' ~l W. Bl{ t () -: 38 i i _ l' j) II i i I~" 0 "7. A"''fnl< !I J\..; ,'~ I I' 'I I ~i I I ~t 39 !! , LLL- ,I Ii! I 1 . 40 I 'i I I I I 8c"32.0 I I III z."I :z.o.......; t'iI!D1 I!I I ! I,I ! II I,' i II: II II ill . ' . f e CITY OF ARDEN HILlS VALUATIONS 1991 - 1993 REV090492 1991 1992 1993 ACIUAL ACIUAL ESl'IMATED Market Value Real Property $457,413,200 $464,928,100 $464,611,200 Personal Property 5.814.400 5.814.400 5.884,400 Total Market valuation $463.227.600 $470.742.500 $470.495.600 . Tax Capacity Real Property $ 13,188,691 $ 12,700,274 $12,094,555 Personal Property 287.814 277.017 276.568 SUbtotal $ 13.476.505 $ 12 .977 .291 $12.371.123 Fiscal Disparities Contrih1tions: - To Pool < 2,782,312> <$ 2,698,817 > <$2,659,372> - From Pool $ 958.820 856.143 884.171 - Net Contribltion < $1.823.492> <$ 1.842.674 > <$1. 775.201> Total Tax Capacity valuation After Reduction For Fiscal Disparities Contrih1tion $11.653 . 013 $ 11.134.617 $10.595.922 . e ~ a> o G; a: ~ ~~ 80~~ N 0 ~~ W~ ~~ N&~~ ~ CC!. toto ,... N CO 0 " -. M _ M CO LDO) W a>m Z < W ~ 8~~ ~@~~88 ~ ~~ w .. . . - - . . CO U"J ~ m~ ~<<l~~~ g NO 0('- ('.l 'l:t (1') ,..~ > 0 0 0'" I- 0 0 0 (\J W to U"I.... Lf) ..J . ~ ~ < (,) o SOllQlQ 0 SOl 0 "'"' ~ ~~.~~~.~ &1 fX~ a: ~ CD <0 U') en 0 ...... -.....- 0( N 1O T""" ,- ~ "'~ W ..... 8 8 8 g g ....(!) N CC!. o. U) to Z > 9 '" .., -. _ 0 C\lC\l CI) ...J C> ~ ~ ...J W :::!I-CI) go 8"'0 J: W < ~..~ o. & Ll!. ~ ~ C!J aJ :E,U: 0.1) M co a:i co) . Z 0 I Cu. ~ W <0 0::10 C::IIIW SOl SOl gogSOlo 0 "'''' <..JU) ::.:: q ('::j ~Rco<o& ~ ~~ u.<O ~ r- "It ~ ~ ct5~ Ol-a. ~ "'''' c: 0 w ~ C3 g: ~Ili 1l. ~~ &!8.~ gj. ~~ ,'" ...... < UJ ..... l() (\j lO.- N -- Via'" Z a: M .... <<l 0 0:> 0) W ~ ..q- C\I 0) ~CI) T"" _ :i ffi 0 00 ~ w ti; c,. SOl SOl 0 SOl SOl 0 SOl .., SOl SOl '" 0 0 0 SOl SOl 0 0 lQ "' 0 0 0 0 8 0 :3 "'"' w::i- ~q~C1C:;_~~~qq~~Rg(Oqlq&~~~.~~~l()g_ ~ ~R tI),UJ U:l co I/) _ co 0 It) \0 LO (;I oot CI:I ..., co co It) M 0 IfI CO) N N -- O~ N ~NMN_M .- N"" W CO~ ~C'- IDW O~ N~ a:~ n. i ul ~ ~ w Z Z <0 ffioc o <00 ~~~ ~< w c ~:; *....~.... >;: ........ .- ...JlI: ou.. z <t W ~ ,0< ~...J...JWWoo ~o tI) ~~ a: ....~...J ~~...J~~W Ww~ ~ Q- ;u ~ < lI:z<tlI:~~ ~~5~ 0( ~~ o < z w2 ~~o ~wOz ~ mtl) ~'~ ~ ~8g fu~o8@m ...J~W~ g ~~ N O~ ~z< ~~0~Om ~C@~ ~~ . ~ 00 ~3~~ -~~ w~~zzlI:wolI:05 T"""~ ~ ffi ~~~~~ lI:*<t:lI:lI:lI:lI:~~~ffiQ~~~~>@ - - ~2w20 I ~_w ~~~~~~~j w~ ..~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i~~~~~~g~~~ ~m<~~ou~~~U~W~~~ZZ~OOO~w~om ~'IW~OZ~~~~~W0~~OW~~ommwffi~~~~uu HI~ ;..JO~o..r-~ 0..- Cf,I C:N < LL...:: ~~~O<<WW~~8wj~~ilio<~~z~~iiO~o~~ ~>~~0~c:oc>>mc:LL.>~~~~z _~~ o~~ ~.O.~ - N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m m 0 ~ ~ M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 ~ N M ~ ~ ~ ~.:::Z .... - ~ - ~ - .- ..... .... iN N N ~ iN iN N b, ~ CITY OF ARDEN HILLS ~ SUMMARY COMPARISON OF REVENUE , WITH REVENUE OF PAIOR YEARS Ill!ll.~III!II!llll!.IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII!il11.111111011111!11111111I1111 GENERAL FUND _property Taxes 1 ,284,489 1,353.736 1.432.582 1.367,240 1,382,850 LicensBs and Permits 129,773 160,990 123.331 167.700 145,200 Intergovernmental Revenue 143,729 166,231 118,170 135.668 199,145 Charges for Services 25,083 25,031 38,700 20,900 23.000 Fines and Forfeits 28.543 29,541 26,000 25,000 25,750 Interest Income 7,049 6.377 4,300 3,010 2,700 Miscellaneous 72.902 42,862 56,030 28.,975 63,745 Other Internal Revenue 21,770 23,948 25,146 25,146 26,400 Other Financing Uses 535 81,000 31,429 115,241 9,783 Total General Fund 1,713,922 1.889,716 1,355,683 1.888,880 1.878,573 SPECIAL FUNDS Shade Tree Disease Control 7,100 11,134 7,765 16,096 17,437 Community Services Fund 62,457 as,OlD 88,000 86,000 80,000 Program Fund 94.056 96,989 119,899 145,487 126,512 Park Fund 57,096 115.113 73,400 81,936 72,320 Cable TV Fund 25,306 30,_ 33,100 31,180 32,350 Lexington Avenue 90-1 233,788 12.298 4,800 3,600 2,900 Capital Equipment #' 1 104,901 1,323 0 0 0 Total Special Funds 585,204 355,527 324,9S4 364,299 331,519 DEBTSER~CESFUNDS Aerial Platform Truck 38,531 78.390 82,928 83,400 85,271 Advanced Refunding Bonds 23.2,340 217,795 178,733 144,791 133,300 Certificate of Indebtedness If 1 25,301 26,309 26,218 26,500 27,242 Total Debt Service Funds 296,672 322,494 287,379 254,691 245,813 CA~TALPROJECTFUNDS Municipal Land and Buildings Fund 63,111 18,329 10,400 10.400 29,600 Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund n3,834 716,832 479,002 541,367 380,058 Development/Redevelopment Fund 25,507 60,596 27,200 23,800 27,600 Total Capital Project Funds 862,452 795,757 516,602 576,067 437,258 . ENTERPRISE FUNDS Water Utility 539,875 603,633 638 ,555 701,550 842.175 Sanitary Sewer Utility 618,205 642,980 629,950 730,515 946,350 Recycling 0 0 78.354 78,920 78,349 Total Enterprise Funds 1,208,080 1,246,663 1,346,859 1,510,985 1.366,874 GRAND TOTAL 4,666,330 4,610,157 4,331,992 4,594,922 4,760,037 . . CITY OF ARDEN HILLS , sUMMARY COMPARISION OF REVENUE BY OBJECT CODE PROPOSED 1993 BUDGET REV 09099 REVENUES BY OBJECT CODE llililjllll!ll;jl';III!'!II~1;.!!!'II,ll;~llll!!'!j~I.1 31010 GENERAL TAX LEVY 1,337.080 1.343.489 1,499,678 1,372,333 1,359,828 e 31020 Delinquent Property Taxe. 20,410 10,328 35,100 (18,200) 5,000 31030 Mobile Homes 8,661 3.&39 5,200 3.600 3,600 31040 Fiscal Disparities 0 103,019 0 117,090 120,481 31050 Tax Increments 12.817 26.358 27,000 21,900 26,000 31900 Penalties & Interest 2.392 15.801 9,500 6,800 5,500 32110 Liquor. On Sale & Sunday 28,650 35,007 30,000 24,300 31.800 32111 liquor I Off Sale 450 0 450 0 450 32160 Contractors 3,_ 3,510 0 3,300 3,400 32180 Business Places 10,728 5,980 7,800 6.000 6.150 32210 Building & Sign Permits 62,748 91,489 61,450 110,000 80,000 32220 Heating Permits 9,532 7,823 8,500 8,000 8,000 32225 Storm Sewer Permits 15 0 15 0 0 32230 Plumbing Permits 2,650 2,520 2.600 2.700 2,850 32240 Dog Registration 1,433 1,869 1,516 1,400 200 32260 Electrial Permits 9,571 12,792 11,000 12,000 12.350 3.2270 Permit Fees (Water) 735 1,100 830 1.150 1,200 3.2280 Permit Fees (Sewer) 225 946 250 370 400 33401 Local Government Aid 0 0 0 0 0 33402 HSTD & Ag Credit Aid (HACA) 0 0 0 14,118 79,149 33403 MFS Home HACA 0 5,080 0 4,550 4,400 33418 MSA-Constructlon 329,245 203,047 32,888 68,194 0 33419 MSA-Maintenance 131.310 9,042 4,770 4,770 4,770 33420 Fireman's Relief 105,678 108,106 108.000 108.000 111,000 33424 Agricultural Credit 0 0 0 0 0 33610 County Aid-Streets 5,047 4,967 5,000 5,000 5,000 33611 Aggregate Tax Distribution 278 208 400 230 230 33612 Arsenal Revenue 100,000 0 0 0 0 33620 County Aid-Recycling 28,871 43.100 18,920 18,920 19,449 . 34100 General Government Fees 3.746 3,980 4,000 2,500 4,000 34103 Plat Fees & Other Permits 11.836 9.991 19,800 5.000 5,500 34109 Apportionment Of Assessments 700 0 700 0 0 34110 Landscape Inspection (1,065) 0 900 0 0 34111 Rent Cellular 1 6.600 6,600 7,200 7,200 7.200 34202 False Alarms 0 1,000 2,700 950 1,000 34206 Dog Impound Fees 304 198 100 100 100 34222 Delinquent False Alarms 0 162 0 0 0 34408 Reimb of Diseased Tree Removal 819 6.779 6,500 6,000 5.650 34409 Weed Removal Reimbursement 0 248 600 250 250 34730 Summer Playground Fees 2.962 3,100 2.000 3,500 3,500 34740 Summer Trip Fees 0 0 1,300 1,650 1.700 34780 Park Use Fees 59,985 77.593 0 0 0 34781 Adult Programs 0 225 38,120 37.325 38,525 34782 Youth Programs 0 0 26,500 33,165 35.555 34790 After School Programs 0 0 4,970 5,650 8,150 34791 Special Event Programs 0 0 3.000 2,550 2,500 . , CITY OF ARDEN HILLS . SUMMARY COMPARISION OF REVENUE BY OBJECT CODE PROpOSED 1993 BUDGET REV090992 REVENUES BY OBJECT CODE e 35101 Court Fines 28,$43 29.541 28,000 25.000 25,750 36100 Special Assessments 355,512 391,914 336,724 380,092 304,390 36201 Sales Tax Collected (3,282) 84 0 95 100 38202 State Bldg Code Surcharges 3,356 6,371 130 4.455 4.700 36203 City Bldg Code Surcharges 0 0 1,500 425 445 36210 Interest IMoma 307,863 319,211 287,175 210,010 169.820 36230 Contributions 106,230 137,n8 128,785 136.515 133,500 36232 Park Dedication Fees 0 50,073 23,300 23,300 23.300 36260 Group Insurance Reimbursement 10.960 12,193 13,325 13,322 12,947 36270 Miscellaneous Reimbursements 67.420 81,552 5,000 4,596 0 38275 Reimb State-Plan Review 0 0 0 0 0 36280 Fire Department Reimbursements 53,590 0 0 0 0 36990 Sale of Equipment 6.620 9.223 40,200 15,000 50,000 37100 Current Billings 510.893 583,886 683,134 145,000 818,580 37170 Hydrant Rental 125 (16) 125 100 100 37180 Meter Deposits 2,415 2,620 2.500 2,500 2,600 37190 Water Meter Upgrade SVs Chg 0 0 0 190 950 37195 MDH Water Test Fee Receipts 0 0 0 6,230 12,460 37200 Current Charges 545.784 542,616 583,000 aa5,000 900.000 372.70 MWCC Strength Charges 0 0 0 0 0 37271 SAC charges 13,200 39,613 23.000 24,000 25.000 38400 Building Rent 21,nO 23,948 25,146 25.146 26,400 39101 Operating Transfer from 101 0 0 0 6.163 8,372 39201 Operating Transfer from 101 26,185 34,318 0 19,016 0 39203 Operating Transfer from 225 0 81,000 86.000 86,000 80,000 39207 Operating Transfer from 602 585 0 468 468 468 . 39218 Operating Transfer from 501 163,215 0 0 83,812 0 39229 Operating Transfer from 601 86,938 10,263 70,505 10,600 10,650 39230 Operating Transfer from 410 0 0 0 0 0 39231 Operating Transfer from 320 0 44,673 26,218 26,922 26,668 2,367,922 2,461,061 2.342,835 2,594,557 2,757,200 GRAND TOTAL 4,666,330 4,610,157 4,331,992 4,594,922 4.760,037 . CITY OF ARDEN HILLS SUMMARY OF CAMPARISON OF EXPENDITURES , ~ WITH EXPENDITURES OF PRIOR YEARS 1:1!;lIll1lllllilill!I'IIBI!illll'lill\"l~;llllil\lllll'111!llillillll'!~~~!!111 e GENERAL FUND Mayor & Council 39550 45756 42873 64046 56600 Municipal Court 40106 44039 36200 38200 40100 Elections 6620 149 11215 11345 200 Administrative Office 243068 284503 252472 259520 263230 Legal 15148 17537 20350 21770 37750 Planning & Zoning 24444 49894 30935 49700 31930 Government Bldgs. 44197 45328 48704 55050 44860 Human Rights 9148 170 200 175 200 Police & Animal Control 396428 452078 478507 434930 473340 Fire 311818 295236 291650 285700 296475 Protective Inspections 53532 53575 48822 57455 50355 Public Works. Streets 247538 328016 315064 364880 314685 P,W., Storm Sewers 17261 14795 18232 26945 23775 Public Works, Recycling 50835 56168 0 0 0 Summer Playground Prog. 8832 10267 12768 12519 1 2832 Skating Rinks 30931 44981 42627 38808 41525 Park Maintenance 122910 169857 173822 173102 182260 Operating Trans. to 224 0 0 0 6763 8372 Operating Trans. to 226 26185 17188 0 19016 0 Operating Trans. to 408 0 17130 0 0 0 TOTAL 1688553 1946667 1824441 1919924 1878489 SPECIAL FUNDS . Shade Tree Disease Cont. 12016 18761 16029 17760 15480 Community Services Fund 60815 81000 86000 86000 80000 Program Fund 92921 114295 119899 122009 128028 Park Fund 52884 95865 58846 57425 62545 Cable TV Fund 11143 18392 17850 17432 17200 Lexington Avenue 90-1 127455 0 0 36717 0 Capital Equipment # 1 88370 17854 0 422 0 TOTAL 445602 346167 298624 337765 303253 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS Aerial Platform Truck 82678 81213 82028 82028 82460 Advance Ref. Bonds 01'85 331580 269570 189945 464945 0 Cert. of Indebted, # 1 600 26819 26218 26500 26668 TOTAL 414858 377602 298191 573473 109128 CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS Municipal Land & Bldgs. Fund 2798 0 10400 25000 15000 Permanent Improve, Rev. Fund 168696 243423 385400 516812 1 25000 Development/Redevelopment 180755 2868 7100 3300 6500 TOTAL 352249 246291 402900 545112 146500 ENTERPRISE FUNDS Water Utility 645708 665077 748690 750813 800605 Sanitary Sewer Utility 677810 788160 870528 867015 919162 Recycling 0 0 77656 71675 74710 TOTAL 1323518 1453237 1696874 1689503 1794477 . TOTAL ALL FUNDS 4,224,780 4,369,964 4,521,030 5,065,777 4,231,847 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS PAGE 1 OF 3 SUMMARY COMPARISON OF EXPENDITURES BY OBJECT CODE PROPOSED 1993 BUDGET REV 091092 Expenditures by Object Code !:li'I!lI_II~I!11;111111111;!lli'I;lli~ltl'~"llllllllllill;IIRI!i:llllllllli~~I~lil e 102 Overtime Salaries 6,987 1 2,453 11 ,087 10,525 10,795 103 CSO Saleries 7,777 7,667 7,500 7,280 0 104 Temp. Employees Salaries 11,367 18,521 34,728 53,238 52,045 106 Council Salaries 12,100 11,813 12,100 12,100 16,320 107 Admn Office Salaries 159,126 201 ,973 222.798 201,560 229,119 108 Public Works Salaries 215,949 219,945 222,258 220,045 227,400 109 Park Salaries 143,628 162.781 157.077 151,245 157,484 120 PERAlFICAlMEDI 63,018 73,661 77,880 76,000 81,040 124 Fireman's Benefit Ass'n 105,678 108,106 108.000 108.000 111 ,000 130 Employer Paid Health Ins, 36,258 38.167 45,841 44,733 48,445 142 Unemployment Comp 348 1,114 0 5,000 0 200 Office Supplies. Postage 13.867 14,786 18.569 18,110 17,625 201 Arts & Crafts Supplies 0 0 1,000 950 1,000 207 Travel, Conf, Schools 10,278 11,770 13,350 6,795 10,925 208 Adult Sports Equipment 0 0 4,500 5,000 5,000 209 Youth Sports Equipment 0 0 4,200 4,175 4,175 212 Gas & Oil 8,840 11,796 10,400 11,800 12,900 215 Shop Tools & Supplies 10,260 7,397 13,000 8.950 9,000 217 Misc. Operating Supplies 5.699 4,462 0 59 0 218 Sports Equipment 7,470 7,489 0 0 0 221 Equipment Maint. & Repairs 16,646 23,071 20,100 28,435 21 ,575 . 223 Bldg & Ground Main\. 5,442 5,404 6.500 6,500 7,000 224 Sand, Salt, Road Mix 14,427 15,414 14,000 14,000 15,000 225 Landscaping 68 416 1,100 1,910 2,200 226 Street Signs 2,375 1,560 3,000 2,000 2,500 227 Utility Maintenance 18,590 14,127 29,000 17.500 23,500 228 Main\. Parks & Playgrounds 9,678 15.526 10,500 11,265 11,950 229 Safety Equipment 9,505 3,420 11,000 7,950 7,250 259 Summer Playground Trips 1,217 910 3,400 2,900 3,050 260 Diseased Tree, Private 5.342 9,577 6.500 9,000 6,000 300 Bldg. Insp. & Mileage 25,191 26,509 22,994 34,000 28,000 301 Accounting & Audit Fees 9,098 9,436 8,400 22.560 7,995 302 Electrical Inspections 10,505 8,908 9,400 9,600 9,880 303 Engineer Fees 74,291 97,937 109,500 105,250 87,700 304 Legal Fees 58,102 70,780 59,900 68,420 66,500 305 Plbg. & Well Inspections 3,904 1,674 1,950 1,830 1,900 306 Heating Inspections 7,413 6,322 9,000 6,400 6,400 307 Landscape Inspections 0 0 1,200 0 0 . . ' CITY OF ARDEN HILLS PAGE 2 OF 3 SUMMARY COMPARISON OF EXPENDITURES BY OBJECT CODE . PROPOSED 1993 BUDGET REV 091092 Expenditures by Object Code il!!II'JII'i;I'\lil!l;III!III1'I'III;I:I'III'I"~"llrllllililillillilliillll~~~lii e 308 Instructor's Fees 39.971 37.236 22,000 22,000 22,000 309 Computer Service 9,556 13,868 14,320 1 6,300 9,620 310 Adaptive Rec, Program 1,578 895 1,000 1,537 1,000 311 Fiscal Consultant 1,648 1,847 3,000 2,000 2,000 312 Planning Consultant 37,704 49.811 41,500 49,600 33,500 313 Ramsey Co. Sheriff 382.343 437,202 464,629 422,460 468,465 314 Fire Protection Contract 204,937 186,624 183,000 177,300 185,000 315 Dog Ordinance 1,307 939 1,250 1,070 3,400 316 Fire Inspections 350 200 350 200 200 317 Architects Fees 0 0 0 25.000 14,000 317 Rendering Plant Insp. 2,207 4,336 0 0 0 318 Utility Inspectors 962 1,353 1,500 1,650 1,750 319 Management Fees 7,274 8,343 3,000 17,000 3,000 320 Storm Sewer Inspections 36 0 50 0 0 321 Telephones 10,852 1 0,568 11,565 11 ,450 12,015 325 Newsletter & Prog, Insert 6,041 5,295 13,044 22,735 22,400 326 Public Education Programs 50 50 100 75 100 331 Mileage Reimbursement 81 133 175 170 175 343 Flyers & Info Materials 2,839 2,840 3,200 2.300 800 344 After School Programs 0 0 500 450 450 345 Special Events Programs 0 0 1,600 1,500 1,500 351 Printing & Publishing 1,620 5,428 2.500 1,000 2,500 . 354 Ballots 321 0 765 765 0 352 Recording Secretary 0 0 0 2,280 2,880 355 Ordinance Codification 830 0 0 0 15,000 360 Bonds & Insurance 79,238 83,457 86,100 95,700 103,900 362 Judgmts & Losses/Prop. 0 1,804 1,500 1,500 1,500 363 Judgmts & Losses/Auto. 0 3.007 2.500 2,000 2,000 381 Electric Utilities 46,941 45,616 48,225 45,225 49,550 382 Water Supply Roseville 344,649 370,558 410,000 410,000 430,000 383 Fuel 3,558 5,572 8,100 5,000 7,000 384 Waste Recycling 50,756 56,132 63,661 58,000 60,335 385 Metro Waste Control Chgs, 385,813 449,004 518,000 517,704 546,012 386 MWCC Strength Charges 0 0 0 0 0 387 MDH Water Test Exp. 0 0 0 6,230 12,460 388 Electricity-Semaphores 3,955 5,910 6,000 5,500 6,000 389 Residential Clean-Up 0 0 5,050 4,000 4,400 390 Gopher State 191 776 500 900 950 . . ' CITY OF ARDEN HILLS PAGE 3 OF 3 . SUMMARY COMPARISON OF EXPENDITURES BY OBJECT CODE . , . PROPOSED 1993 BUDGET REV 091092 <-' ,1990 >', -'" <i1l9!!>. ';" >,.1992' ' "'1992 " " 1993\3 , ''', n, " , n" < " ,'" ,,,' ~ , 'H, , ".'.'..-:.:r Expenditures by Object Code ,'AciuaF "':'" 'ACtual:,;, ,,' Budget,' ,'",,'Est;,'>:' "'Prom~n e 404 Office ,Equipment Main!. 2,605 2,919 3.800 3,000 800 406 Street Sweeping 0 0 0 0 0 407 Diseased Tree, Public 449 2,946 2,000 2.000 2,000 408 Pavement Management Plan 85,941 168,657 130,000 197,500 105,000 409 Civil Defense Siren Main!. 0 3,369 2,000 450 500 412 Building Coordinator Cost 5,471 9,220 0 0 0 415 Equipment Rent 712 1,739 2,000 1,500 2,000 417 Uniforms 2,402 2.281 2,296 2,220 2,155 418 Rental, Facilities & Equip 40 40 11,400 9.180 8,500 420 Depreciation Expense 135,274 143,327 143,082 151,000 172,000 433 Dues & Subscriptions 24,772 19,193 21,193 19,294 20,090 437 Misc. Expenses 18,032 10,329 4,080 25.947 5,600 438 Employee Paid Health Ins. 10,943 13,162 18,865 15,003 18,092 439 Sales Tax 6,719 8,687 9,100 9,110 12,110 440 Bldg. Code Surcharges 3.033 4.917 2,500 4,400 3,200 441 Refunds & Reimbursements 18,128 3,748 0 0 0 442 SAC Reimbursements 13,043 38,610 20.000 20,000 23,000 443 Reimb. State-Plan Review 0 0 0 0 0 444 City Gardens 0 854 1,000 0 0 445 Bank Charges 0 4,917 1,200 6,785 2,600 446 Weed Control/Removal 0 411 500 250 500 510 Land 0 0 0 0 0 . 520 Buildings 594 1,137 2,500 2,500 3,000 525 Lift Stations 0 0 0 0 0 530 Contractor 286,588 248,647 364,923 419,182 121 ,680 550 Machinery & AutomObile 101 ,570 29,194 57,375 46,375 50,335 570 Office Furniture & Equip 8,419 9,690 10,965 13,980 13,000 580 Misc. Equipment 3.334 23,289 19.525 24,715 42,600 601 Principai 335,000 292,500 232,500 507.500 77 ,500 611 Interest 79,258 58,283 39,473 39,473 4,960 720 Operating Transfer to 101 21,770 122,802 56,575 140,809 35,715 721 Operating Transfer to 226 26,185 17,188 44,639 63,655 41,085 727 Operating Transfer to 520 66,296 0 0 0 0 731 Operating Transfer to 501 86,938 97,082 96,723 97,100 97,318 737 Operating Transfer to 408 60.815 17,130 1 0,400 10,400 29,600 741 Operating Transfer to 522 0 0 0 0 0 742 Operating Transfer to 410 102,400 0 0 0 0 744 Operating Transfer to 224 0 0 0 6,763 8,372 GRAND TOTAL 4,224,780 4,369,964 4,521,030 5,065,777 4,231,847 . J ... CITY OF ARDEN JIILIS . MIHEllNOOM DATE: september 10, 1992 'XU: Mayor and city council 9f Dorothy Person, Clerk JIdm; n; "trator FRCM: Catherine J. Iage, Deputy clerk/ZOning 1ldministrator Cp ~: Proclamation - u.s. Army Reserve DaY-9/27/92 In conjunction with their Open House and Dedication cerem:my, the U.S. Anny Reserve has requested Council adopt the attached Proclamation. ACrION REl:lUIRED: If Council con=s, they should pass a motion adopting the Proclamation Declaring September 27,1992, U.S. Anny Reserve Day. CIT/ts Attachment . . PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, the Army Reserve have protected this nation's freedom for over 75 years. WHEREAS, hundreds of Residents of Arden Hills are veterans of wars which have protected our freedom. WHEREAS, the newly built Army Reserv'e Center is being dedicated as the Arden Hills U.S. Army Reserve Center. WHEREAS, the Army Reserves is building community relations by sharing its facility and resources with the City of Arden Hills. NOW, THEREFORE, I, THOMAS R. SATHER, MAYOR OF THE CTIY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA, do hereby proclaim the 27th day of September, 1992, as U.S. Army Reserve Day in the City of Arden Hills, and I commend this observance to the people of this area. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CTIY OF ARDEN HILLS THIS 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1992. THOMAS R. SATHER, MAYOR ATTEST: DOROTHY A. PERSON, CLERK ADMINISTRATOR '7- -------- . , . CITY OF ARDEN JIILIS MEMl:EANDUM DATE: sept~her 9, 1992 'XU: Mayor, city council, and Dorothy Person, Clerk 1ldmini.strator FRCI!: Dan winkel, Public WOrks SUperintendent D\\f SUBJECT: 1\cc:epting and 1IpprOVing COntract for Inspection of the City water ToWer Located on Fernwood Avenue Attached is a proposal from A.E.C. Engineering f= inspection of the City water tower on Fernwood Avenue. As you knCM, the city has an existing interior rust problem on this tower that may soon need repair. Pat Arlig from M.S.A. has discussed this issue with various engineering firms which perform this type of inspection. Her recarmnendation is that A.E.C. is qualified to perform this type of inspection and that the quote received from A.E.C. is very reasonable. Council authorization for A.E.C. to do this inspection is required. At a previous meeting, . the Council authorized $3,000 to have this analysis done this fall. The inspection quote from A.E.C. is for $2,000 with an $850 charge per day after the first day. It should be noted that all parties involved indicate that this inspection can be completed in one day. R:EO::MMENDATION : I am requesting Council authorization for the inspection to be done by A.E.C., as soon as it can be scheduled. Q)UNCIL ACTION: 'I11e Council should authorize the Mayor and/or staff to sign the proposed. contract with A.E.C. Engineering for the inspection of the water tower located on Fernwood Avenue and authorize the expenditure of $2,000. rM:rk . ---- ----- . , " . AEC ENGINEERING ENGINEERS INSPECTORS 511 Eleventh Avenue South Minneapolis. Minnesota 55415 Phone: 1612) 332~905 ~1J~@[]:io\g;' , Fax: (612) 334-3101 August 17, 1992 I ~'--!!'j .1i ':, '. J j;) ':f'>.t'F} ! i II ! : Ir~1 1'1: " ,',1:-' "W I L" <,' .~'.- I' " ,I ': Ii IU ' , Ms, Patricia A. Arlig, P,E, L --'--~LJ MSA 9800 Shelard Parkway, Suite 102 Minneapolis, MN 55441 Re: Proposal to Inspect a 500 MG Hydropillar City of Arden Hills. Minnesota AEC Proposal #MN062992 Dear Ms, Arlig: We are pleased to submit this proposal to inspect the 500 MG Hydropillar for the City of Arden Hills, Minnesota in the Fall 1992, The inspection will be performed in conformance with the applicable sections of the enclosed . Procedures For Insoectina Existina Steel Water Storaae Tanks, Please note that the owner is to provide an operator to control the flow rate from the reservoir, This person must be at the control station full time while our inspectors are inside the reservoir. This is a safety precaution so that in an emergency, the flow from the reservoir can be stopped immediately, The interior will be examined by one or two individuals floating in a raft while the reservoir is being emptied, This evaluation can only be performed if the temperatures are above freezing and there is no ice in the reservoir. The exterior will be examined in areas accessible without any rigging or scaffoldin9, Paint chips from the exterior coating will be analyzed for total lead content. Based on the results, we may recommend a TCLP Test be performed on a sand blasted sample to determine if removal of the exterior coating will generate hazardous waste, Followin9 the inspection, we will submit an Inspection Report, certified by a professional engineer. The report will include color photographs of the conditions discovered during the inspection, engineering analysis. and cost estimates of any reconditionin9 work required, The report will also include necessary repair procedures for an existing leak, Two copies of the report will be provided, The reservoir inspection will be done for a fixed fee of $2.000,00, including the certified Inspection Report and initial paint chip test for lead, If the Inspection cannot be completed in one day, each additional day will be charged at $850,00, The inspection fee does not include the cost of the TCLP Test. AEC provides this service and a cost estimate will furnished upon request. . n , . . . Ms. Patricia A. Arlig, P,E. MSA August 17. 1992 Page 2 of 2 This proposal is valid for 90 days, If you find our proposal acceptable, please sign and return this letter, We can schedule the inspection upon receipt of this document. Sincerely, RING Accepted this day of , 1992 City of Arden Hills, Minnesota By Officer Enclosures: Procedures for Inspection of Existin9 Steel Water Tanks Company Brochure . Project References . L MINllTES CITY OF THE ARDEN JIILIS, MI:NNESCJ:rA PLlINNIm o.::HaSSICIiI ME:EIl'Im . ~Y, SEI?'l'noIBER 2, 1992 7:30 P.M. - CITY mILL Cl\LL 'XU aIDER Chair Probst called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. ROLL Cl\LL Present: Chair Dennis Probst, Members Dave Carlson, Raymond McGraw, steve Erickson, and Jeanne winiecki. Absent: Members Scott Petersen, and Barbara piotrowski. Also present: Planner John Bergly, Acting Clerk Administrator Catherine Iago, Recording Secretary Tery Shields, and Council Liaison Thomas Mahowald. APPRCl\7E MINllTES Chair Probst noted on Page 5 and 6, Case #92-15 SUP Amendment and Height Variance for Bethel College; surname for George Brushaber should be Doctor (Dr.) winiecki also noted on Page 9, motion to adjourn was seconded by piotrowski. McGraw moved, seconded by Erickson, to approve the August 5, 1992, Planning Minutes. All voted in favor. (5-0) . CllSE #92-16: SITE PIAN REVIEW. 1160 WEST CXllJNl'Y ROAD E. JOE cn!MERS (QiNER) Planner Bergly referred to his report dated September 2, 1992, and explained this item was presented to the Planning Commission in a conceptual fonnat at their meeting and is resul::rnitted for site Plan approval. The proposal includes renovation of the Wilding, site and public access. Bergly reviewed the findings listed in his report and the Revised Plan dated 9/02/92 (handout) and stated the issues that need to be addressed are as follows: 1. Acoess : A. Present access is one 30-foot driveway near the center of County Road E frontage a=mmodating 1 wide lane in and 1 wide lane out. B. Preliminary Plan: Access via a new driveway near the west property line; egress via the existing drive. C. CUrrent Plan: Present 2-way drive continuing as it exists; an additional 1 lane access drive near west property line. 2. Buildi.nq: A. Preliminary plan shc7..;ed west 'h of building removed and replaced with 4 drive-up lanes with one additional lane west of the present Wilding but infringing on the required 5- foot sideyard landscape strip. . B. Revised plan retains existing roof of west 'h of Wilding and all 5 drive-up lanes are under the roof. Columns will replace the west wall with both north and south walls removed up to the eaveline. planning t"o.....i..sion Meeting , 2 9-02-92 Cl\SE #92-16; SITE PLl\N REVIEW. 1160 WEST COONl'Y RCll\D E. JOE CGIMERS (C7iiNER) (continued) : . C. '!he Wilding facade will have a new portico installed at the bank portion of the Wilding entrance and the Mr. Movies facade and gable end over the drive-up lanes will match the propo$ed bank facade. 3. Park:inq: A. Parking demand is assumed by the OWner to be less than the total required for each use, due to different peak periods of use for the two bJsinesses. B. The plan shao1s a total of 38 spaces. The parking north of the building is calculated using 8-foot wide stalls; 9 feet is required. Adjustments could be made so that only 1 or 2 spaces would be lost. C. EilIployee parking is appropriately provided on the southeast corner of the building. 4. stack:inq Space in Drive-up Lanes: A. six (6) spaces are adequate. 'Ihe plan show 5, 5, 6, 6, and 7 for each lane. 5. Landscao:inq: A. Although 20 new trees and 32 shrubs are proposed, it is recommended plan changes be made as shown on the Proposed Plan. B. Five (5) foot wide landscape strips are shown around the perimeter of all paved areas and adjacent to the Wilding. The front parking setback exoeeds the 20-foot minimum. . 6. Trash Enclosure: A small trash enclosure with hand IOClvable container will be used. Pickup- schedule to be arranged so it will not conflict with bJsiness traffic. 7. Liaht:inq: Double shoe box fixture on 16 foot poles are proposed at 4 staggered locations between County Road E and the Wilding. One light should also be provided for the east parking lot and drive and one or two lower light standards (10 I - 12 ') or bollard lighting should be provided at the south end of the Wilding. Planner Bergly concluded with the following reconunendations: 1. Waive the Moratorium Ordinance. 2. Determine that the parking requirement for Mr. Movies of 1 space/220 sq. ft. of floor area is adequate and that the total parking requirement of 40 cars can be reduced by 3 spaces due to the different peak hour usage for the 2 bJsinesses. (Available parking may limit the types of uses that will someday replace either of the uses) . 3. Approve the site Plan with the following conditions: a. Approval will allow the Applicant to obtain a Wilding permit to undertake building demolition and site related work. Before the Wilding permit is issued for the facade reconstruction, Wilding elevations must be approved by the Planning Commission, Council and Building Inspector. This . 2-stage approval process is proposed by the Applicant to allow the site paving to occur before potential frost. b. The landscaping plan is to be revised in accordance with the Proposed Plan and a landscape bond is to be provided to the City before any building permits are issued. - --- ------ -- -- , . Planning CCIIIni.ssion Meeting 3 9-02-92 . Cl\SE #92-16: SITE PLAN REYIE.W, 1160 WEST CXlUNl'Y ROlID E. JOE CXHmRS (amER) (continued) : c. One additional light standard be provided on the east side of the wilding and Bollard lighting or two lcMer light standards be provided along the south drive. All members of the Commission expressed their concern regarding the parking and future development of the property. There was a lengthy discussion between the members and Planner Bergly. Mr. Joe Ccmnners, OWner, spoke regarding his plans for the property and asked the Commission to support the site Plan approval in 2 phases. Mr. Peter Hilger, President of a Construction Management firm in Roseville, and Mr. Bruce Lundgren, President of Security Development, expressed their support of the proposed plans and requested the Commission I s approval to begin work at the site. Mr. Kurt Dale reviewed the plans for the exterior Wilding changes. Mr. IJJndgren described the interior of the Wilding and stated the tenants would not be utilizing all the square footage for retail space due to the split-level design of the wilding. Mr. Hilger stated utilities would be installed to acconunodate onsite . drainage. winiecki expressed her concerns on the traffic flow, circulation problems, lack of information on wilding materials and drawings for su!:lnission of a site Plan Review. There was a lengthy discussion of the traffic circulation concerns, parking, and options for future use of the Wilding. Mr. Hilger stated he is willing to provide any information necessary for the Commission to review and expressed his desire of approval of concept for the use of the site and approval of the site Plan. winiecki stated the Planning Commission does not approve concept designs. Winiecki moved that Commission reconunend to Council denial of Case #92-16, site Plan Review, 1160 West County Road E, Joe Ccmnners (OWner) . Motion died for lack of a second. Cllair Probst moved, seconded by winiecki, that Commission reconunend to Council approval of the site inprovements proposed for Case #92-16, Site Plan Review, 1160 West County Road E, subject to incorporation of the modifications proposed in the Planner's Memo. '!his rec:arnnemation shall include site demolition and bnprovements as . described and demolition and structural support of the north, west and south walls of the existing Wilding as necessary for the proposed bank drive-thru facility. No further Wilding bnprovements shall be undertaken. No Wilding pennits or certificate of Occupancy will be I issued until the project has been approved by the Commission. Motion carried. (ProbSt, McGraw, Erickson voting in favor; Carlson and r 7 -- pll'lnn;'Iq o."''';Rl'Jion Meeting 4 9-02-92 ~ Cl\SE #92-16: SITE PLl\N REVIE.W. 1160 WEST COtlNl'Y R07lD E. JOE caemRS (OWNER) (Continued) : winiecki opposed) . (3-2). . 'lhe suhT\ission for full project shall include all infonnation outlined in the Ordinance for site Plan Review. Chair Prowt informed the Applicant that although Mr. Camners may be:Jin the necessary site work after Council approval, the Conunission has not recormnended a final site plan approval and that it will be subject to the Conunission review and approval of proposed i1rprovements to the J:cilding . He expressed his concern regarding the lack of suhT\ission of materials for the site Plan Review which was begun this evening. Chair Prol:st explained that the Conunission would prefer to retain the opportunity to review and make reconunendation to Council on the J:cilding and site plan. Winiecki noted that it appears Conunission has lost the opportunity to review circulation on site by approving the site improvements, i.e.; installation of the utilities and demolition of a portion of the J:cilding . Chair Prowt indicated there are no other options for circulation on this site, unless the City chooses to get involved in the acquisition of access to the easterly adjacent site. McGraw moved, Erickson seconded, to waive the Development . Moratorium for Case #92-16, site Plan Review, 1160 West County Road E, Joe Commers (OWner). Motion carried (Prowt, McGraw, Erickson voting in favor; Carlson and winiecki opposed). (3-2). DISCUSSICti: 0l'HER l'Ll\NNIH; ISSUES (CXIlrINUED) PrOPOSed DevelOPIllel'lt of Bethel Colleoe site West of Snellim. PrOPOSed by Good Value Homes: Mr. John Peterson, vice President of Good Value Homes, stated Good Value Homes is in the process of negotiating with Bethel College for the acquisition of a 10-a=e parcel near Chatham Avenue. He stated they are in the preliminary stages of developing approxlinately 36 townhome units (2 t~omes per unit), 1,200 sq.ft. and above per unit, and valued at $100,000 to $130,000 per unit. Mr. Peterson asked the Conunission about their opinions to the development and affects, if any, to the neighborhood. Mr. Dan O:jren, El:iina Realty, stated the density would be 5 to 6 units per a=e and indicated support of this type of development in Arden Hills. He indicated there is a strong market for townhouse development. Erickson questioned the possibility of rezoning the land to R-3 since there is a development moratorium inposed at this time. . Planning Conunission encouraged the Applicant to consider single family development. . Planning Calmi.ssion Meeting 5 9-02-92 . CXXJNCIL REPORT Council Liaison Thomas~Mahowald reported on items of interest to the Commission. 1lDJOtlRN McGraw moved, seconded by Erickson to adjourn at 9:45 p.m. Chair Dennis Probst . . . . CITY OF ARDEN KILLS MEH:Il1lNOOM DATE: septam~~ 10, 1992 'XU: Mayor and city council t1 ' ~~ FRCM: Dan Winkel, Public works auperint.....nent y.' S01lJ];X:T : Medical Leave of AbsenCe for Fred Reed I have conferred with Mr. Reed regarding his 90-day medical leave of al:sence which is coming to an end on September 10. Fred infonled me that he sustained an injury the 1st week of August and his doctor has advised him that his recovery period will be exterrled another one to two months. Fred is very appreciative of all the time council granted him. With this in mind, Fred is requesting an additional 90 day medical leave of al:sence without pay. I explained to him at this time, this would probably be his only option. RECX:M1ENDATION: . staff re=rnrnends to Council to grant his request of exterxiing his medical leave of absence for an additional 90 days corrnnencing September 11, 1992 until December 13, 1992. AcrION REQUIRED: If Council concurs with staff reconunendation, they should grant Mr. Reed a 90 day medical leave of al:sence corrnnencing September 11, 1992 to December 13, 1992, as requested. m:rk . . August 26, 1992 Mayor and city Council Members: I would like to take this ~ty to thank the Council for the 90 day medical leave of al:sence. 'lbe leave was for the pericrl of time of June 10 thru Sept. 10. My progress has been much slower than I had anticipated. I sustained another injury in the first week of August. My doctor has indicated to me that I will have a setback of another 1 to 2 months. BeCause of this new development, I am requesting an additional 90-clay medical leave of absence without pay. Both myself and Ilr:f physician are hopeful that by then I will be able to return to work. Once again, both myself and Ilr:f family appreciate the extended time that the Council has granted to me, and I am very hopeful that I will be able . to return to work soon. S~~il~_ Fred Reed . /rPiJ 11JPf~ ~ ,... .. . CITY OF ARDEN JIILIS MEKlWlDUM DATE: .:rune 4, 1992 'XU: Mayor and City council FRCI!: I:an Winkel, Public Works SUperintendent dliJ SUBJEX:T: Medical Leave of Absence for Fred Reed I have conferred with Mr. Reed all options available regarding his status with Arden Hills. Fred is aware of the Council's decision not to extend any additional sick or vacation time. Fred is very appreciative of all the time Council granted him. With this in mirrl, Fred is requesting a 90 day medical leave of absence without pay. I explained to him at this time, this would probably be his only option. REC'CM1ElIDATION : . staff recommends to Council to grant his request of a medical leave of absence for 90 days conunencing June 13, 1992 until September 10, 1992. ACrION 'RFDlITRFD: If Council concurs with staff recommendation, they should grant Mr. Reed a 90 day medical leave of absence conunencing June 13, 1992 to September 10, 1992, as requested. rw:rk - . C'C': ~ . " . June 4, 1992 May= and city Council Members: I would like to take this opp:lrtunity to thank the Council for all of your help and understanding while I have been injured and away from my job. , My progress has been much slower than I had anticipated, and at times, can be very frustrating. I am still hoping and planning to come back to w=k as soon as possible. However, at this time f I understand that my sick time and most of my vacation time has been used up by my alsence, and I am requesting a 90"'i:lay medical leave of absence without pay. Both myself and my physician are hopeful that by then I will be able to return to work. once again, both myself and my family appreciate the extended time that the Council has granted to me, and I am very hopeful that I will be able to return to work soon. . 'ir=cl/l'd~ '. ~SS2 <Ct.\'iS" ,,' ;j.j Fred Reed ~.I- J ' V/I"- [ , .