The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCCP 06-08-1992 I CLLkj 1\GElIlDl. . 1IRDEIII HILIB CITY CXlllNCIL MEE'l'lXi CXlllNCIL cm\MBERS ~, JUNE 8, 1992, 7:30 P.M. 1. CALL 'ID ORDER/ROLL CALL. 7:30 P.M. 2. AGENDA AOOPl'ION i. ~3. APPROVAL OF MAY 26 <XlUNCIL MINUl'ES / "'J ~ ,'! 4. cx:NSENI' Cl\LENDAR C 'P',; " .~\.~ Awrove Bingo Hall License Renewal - Pot-o-Gold Bingo Hall, 3776 . 1 ". ,~._' :'..'. . 'IJ Connelly Avenue. ~. ~~,) ,',\' b. Awrove Clan3'e Order for Hazelnut Park Trail Improvements. Ij.', ; c. Acknowledge Receipt of Budget Infonnation. / 1. d )/ . Request for Defennent of Special Assessments - Tiller Lane. ,P I~~' e Approve Salaries for Seasonal Parks and Recreation Employees. Jiytj' f: JlFprove List of Claims/Payroll. 5. PUBLIC a:MIENI'S PllBLIC llEMUK;S: ,lW,. ASSESSMENT HEARlliG FOR KEI'IHSON POND IMPROVEMENl'. 7:30 P.M. ( l l,lj;)-J A. Adopt Res. No. 92-41 Adopting Final Assessment Roll. /l"11 Ie 7. IMPROVEMEm' HEARlliG - DUNlAP STREEI' IMP.ROVEMENI'S. 8:30 P.M. A. Adopt Res. No. 92-39 Ordering the Improvement in the Matter of the 1992 Dunlap street Improvement. B. Adopt Res. No. 92-40 Approving Plans and Specifications and Ordering the Advertisement for Bids and Scheduling Assessment Hearing for July 13 at 7:30 p.m. in the Matter of the 1992 Dunlap street Improvement. IMPROVEMEm' HEARlliG - WEST ROUND U\KE BOULEI1AllD. 9:00 P.M. A. Adopt Res. No. 92-37 Ordering the Improvement in the Matter of the 1992 Round Lake Road West Improvement. B. Adopt Res. No. 92-38 Approving Plans and Speciiications and Ordering the Advertisement for Bids and Scheduling Assessment Hearing for July 13 at 7:30 p.m. in the Matter of the 1992 Round Lake Road West Improvement. Planning CoIIImission Recommendation to Consider l111posing a Developnent Moratorium. Case #92-06; Amend SUP, Amoco oil Company, 1306 W. County Road E (Request to Table Action to July 13, 1992). Case #92-11; SUP, 'TWin City Pet SUpply, 1212 Red Fox Road. Case #92-07; variance, Frank and Mary Beth Ranallo, 1355 CUnunings Lane. (Verbal Request to Table Action to July 13, 1992 - Written Request Available Monday) . P1\GE TliO - JUNE 8. 1992. :l\RDEN HILLS CITY ~ MEEll'ING 9. UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS (Continued) . , / E Case #92-08; Variance, James Dlugosch, 1482 Arden view Drive. ~ Case #92-10; Side Yard Variance, Evie Dunn, 3465 siems Court. status Report on SAC C11arges for Arden Manor Trailer Park, ,U Attorney Filla (Verbal). Discussion of May Financial Reports - Terrance Post. Acknowle:ige Receipt of Request for a 90-day Medical Leave of AbsEIDce f= Public Works Employee. Receive Resignation from Building Maintenance Employee, Maureen Winkel. COUNCIL <XMi!ENTS / 11. ADJOURN JUNE MEEI'INGS JULY MEEI'INGS June 3 - Plannin;J Comm, 7:30 pm July 1 - Planning Comm, 7:30 pm June 8 - Council Mtg, 7:30 pm July 3 - INDEPENDENCE DAY (HOLIDAY) June 15- Council Worksession, 4:30 pm July 13- Council Mtg, 7:30 pm June 18- Public Safety/Wks, 7:30 pm July 16- Public Sfty/Wks, 7:30 pm June 23- Park & Rec Cornm, 7: 30 pm July 23- Finance Comm, 7:30 pm June 25- Finance Comm, 7: 30 pm July 27- Council Mtg, 7:30 pm June 29- Council Mtg, 7:30 pm July 28- Park & Rec Comm, 7:30 pm . I . f . .. lf . HINUTES CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING May 2" 1992 u, 7: 30 P.M. - City Hall ~~LL TO ORDER/ROLL CAk4 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Councilmember Mahowald called to order the regular City Council meeting at 7:30 p.m. Present: Councilrnembers JoAnn Growe, Dale Hicks, Thomas Mahowald, Paul Malone. Mayor sather arrived -" 7:50 ac p.m. Also present were: City Attorney, Jerry Filla; City Engineer, Mark Graham; Public Works superintendent, Dan Winkel; Acting Clerk Administrator, catherine Iago. Minutes transcribed from tape by Recording Secretary, Foster. ADOPT AGENDA MOTION: 1v1alone moved, seconded by Growe, to adopt the May 26, 1992 agenda as presented. Motion carried unanimously (4- 0) . . APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MINUTES MOTION: Hicks moved, seconded by Malone, to approve the minutes of May , ' 1992 Regular Council Meeting as prepared. .Ll. , Motion carried unanimously (4-0). CONSENT CALENDAR HOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Growe to approve the Consent Calendar and authorize execution of all necessary documents contained therein. Hotion carried unanimously - (4-0) . a. Acknowledgement of Resolution No. 92-36 Accepting Bid and Authorizing Execution of Contract in the Hatter of the 1992 Keithson Area storm Sewer Improvements. b. Approve List of Claims/Payroll. I'UBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS ORDINANCE NOS. 286 & 287- . RESIDENTIAL RECYCLING Attorney Filla advised that per Council direction given at the May 11, 1992 Council meeting, he drafted proposed Ordinance 287 relating to imposition of a residential r'ecycling fee for .. .. #"\ Arden Hill s Council 2 May 26, 1992 . multi-family units and manufactured home parks. He added that the proposed ordinance imposes a fee unless proof is provided by July 15, 1992 of contracting with an alternative recycling service. Filla stated that based upon recommendations by the City's recycling hauler, he also drafted proposed Ordinance 286 which prohibits scavenging of recyclable materials. MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Hicks, to adopt Ordinance No. 286 Relating to the Scavenging of Recyclable Materials. Motion carried unanimously (4-0). MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Growe, to adopt Ordinance N~. 287 Imposing a Residential Recyc 1 ing Fee. Motion carried unanimously (4-0) . RESULTS DF 1991 AUDIT' Gary Groen, or Abaol Abdo t, Eick, appeared before Council for the purpose of reviewing the City's 1991 audit report. Groen highlighted speci fi c accounts comparing budget to actual figures. Groen reported that the City is realizing a 94% tax collection . rate. With regard to the negative varlance in the general fund budget, Groen explained the primary reason is delinquent taxes. He al so noted that the positive variance in Fire Services 1S due to reimbursements from 1989 and 1990 which were applied in 1991. Groen explained account transfers in and out and reviewed special funds, debt service funds, capital improvement fundsl and enterprise funds giving some comparisons to previous years. In response to Councilmember Malone's inquiry, Groen provided clarification as to how interest is managed on special assessment bonds. Councilmember Mahowald asked Groen to describe the overall financial picture of all funds. Groen compared the major funds to previous years and stated the overall pi.ct.ure i - -~ "close to or better .' - year ag01l, \..-nan a Councilmember Malone drew attention to some notable cost overruns In the Public Works and Recreation Program areas. Council direct.ed the Public Harks Superintendent and Parks Director to work \-.;'i th Groen to address those overruns and . provide Council with an analysis report at the next Council meeting. . . ., . Ara'en1-<-i11r'< Councl" 3 \.l~Y)~ 12:C;"'"l ~.:. _ .l. .1 .::;. _ .. ~cl. _ V r .I. ~- - .::... ARDEN PLAC? DRAINAGE Mayor sather arrived at 7:55 p.m, Engineer Graham provided background on this lssue. rie reported that a public hearing was held in october. 1991 where plans were presented to extend a 1211 plpe [rOE) ;.ne l"ear c:t 1553 Arden Plac~ to the south toward Lake Johanna to correct drainage problems in the Arden Place area. Graham stated that further review of the situation was then delayed due to the extreme snowfall which began the end of October, 1991. Referring to his May 18, 1992 report. Graham explained the proposed layout of two drainage options and compared them as follows: Option 1 would be the most direct route, however it would require extensive removal of existing trees, would present construction difficulties. and would require easement acquisition. The cost of Option 1 would be about $17,000 plus easement acquisition. . Option 2 would be more favorable in that construction would take place In City owned right-of-way and would minimally affect existing trees. The cost of Option 2 would be about $24,000. Graham recommended Option 2 and advised that Option 1 has received some opposition from affected residents. He added that either option would provide an adequate solution to the drainage problem. _ Councilmember Growe asked to compar'e Option 1 and option 2 relative to impact on existing trees. Graham said Option 1 would require the removal of possible 15 - 18 trees, while he would hope that Option 2 could avoid any tree removal. Councilmember Hicks inquired as to why the drainage and easement problem was not addressed when the house at 1553 was built. Graham stated there was a drainage pipe in place at that time and the placement of that pipe has not changed, but the pipe has been plugged for some time, therefore ineffective as a drainage system. Wally Bauer, 1553 Arden Place, stated that when he bought his lot, he assumed the existing drainage pipe was adequate, then the City issued a building permit. the house was built, the . drainage problem was identified, and the City has tried to no avail to unplug the existing pipe. '" . . Arden Hi lIs Council 4 May 26, 1992 . Public Works Superintendent Winkel reported that different methods have been used three or four times to unplug the existing 6" - 8" pipe, but have been unsuccessful. Councilmember Malone co~~ented that information and options have become available since the October, 1991 public hearing, therefore it would be appropriate to hold another public hearing to help Council choose the least expensive, most appropriate solution. Councilmember Mahowald asked how many homes in the area contribute to the existing drainage problem. Graham said there are eight homes involved. The question of cost for easement acquisition was raised. Attorney Filla advised that the City may have easement rights or may be able to negotiate for easement, and the cost of doing so may range from quite small to very significant. He added that if condemnation procedures were required, the cost of such procedures would exceed the difference in cost between Option 1 and Option 2. Counci lmember Hicks commented that easement acquisition estimates are essential in comparing the two options. Dale Noyed, 3505 Ridgewood Road reported that he attended a . meeting at Johanna Beach club regarding a solution to this problem and there was no overwhelming support or opposition for any particular method to solve the problem. MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Mahowald, to order a public hearing on the issue of Arden Place drainage to be held at 7:30 p.m., June 29, 1992; and direct the Engineer to prepare comparisons of Options 1 and 2 for consideration. Motion carried unanimously (5-0). CHARlrABLE GAMBLING REGU~ATIONS Temporary City Accountant, Terry Post, reported that the City is tracking very well against budget in the area of charitab16 gambling operations. However, in reviewing the method of licensing, Post, noticed that most charitable gambling organizations are not complying with ordinance as it defines "gross profi ts" and this has created a dispari ty betYrJeen what the city expects to be paid and what it is actually being paid by licensees. Fost and Attorney Filla advised that the ordinance is consistent with State law and clearly defines the formula by ;..rhich charitable gambling licensees are to calculate their . obligation to the City. That formula is "Total gambling receipts, less prizes and awards, less allowable expenses, multiplied by 10% payable quarterly to the City." , . . Arden Hills Council ".,. :392 - ~'),G 'I - - Post said his conce:rTi 1S that .\-1-'i=> maJorIty of ;.. =-- ce~-l~,;:;es 3.1:-'::: 1....__. including taxes as an "allCl'l"labl,-= eXF'cnsGt', ~, - >251.--,1 t ~ .3 _.1>:: ~. .. !. '- rnost licensees are paying tne City 10% after taxes L"a the::: .~_ ~-. QJ.-~ befoLe taxes, and ~he City 15 collecting about c'-- .r" ;~ 0,'-' , .:;; 1:)\.. I ", ',-, ,) -,;:::.:..;::;' than .L ~. should JJe. . Attol.-ney Fllla explained t.hat it 1S a "1 ay.,1ful purpose" ).u,_ charitable g_ambling licensees to pay taxes, b"";,,, taxes <3.i>:::: nGt. '^c included as an 1Tallowable expense" as defined by .\- '\.-..- state l.HC Gambling Control Boal:d. Post identified three alternative actions to address .\- 'k ~ 1...11.1.5 issue: 1 ) Amend the ordinance to redefine licensees' obligation to the City; 2 ) Collect retroactively frorl'. the licensees; 3) Clarify with licensees their obligations per current ordinance. MOTION: Hicks moved, seconded by Growe, to notify charitable gambling , . that effective July , 1992 : llcensees i, 1 ) The method of calculating their gross profits ',.:[:......1 be per ordinance, i . e. , gambling receipts less prizes and awards, less allowable expenses, equal . gross profits; 2 ) The City expects to receive 10% of gross profits; , , Allowable does not include level of ~) expenses any taxes. Councilrnembers Mahowald and Malone commented ._ t.... ~ + seerns '-lid..... -- reasonable to include certain expenses a- "allowable expenses"/ but perhaps computing the City's 10% based upon pre-tax figures could be construed as imposing a sort of double jeopardy. - Mayor Sather commented that he would be incl ined to support Councilmember Hick's motion because the City must be responsible to collect from every appropriate legal r"evenue source; in this case the City is missing a revenue . '. oppor\..unl....y. Councilmember Malone commented that it 'l,-,- ~ become much more ~~a ...... difficul t and time-consuming to administer and enforce charitable gambling operations than the City original~y anticipated. Councilmember Mahowald suggested further thought and review or this item before taking action. . councilmember Hicks withdrew his .' Growe withdrew her mOl-lOn, second. . . . , Al:den Hills Council 6 May 26, 1992 . Councilmember Hicks stated that licensees al:e not being tl:eated equally and fairly, that most licensees al:e not all following the l:ules. He raised the possibility of amending the ordinance to continue the 10% pl:e-tax obligation to the City, but slightly l:educe the extent to which licensees must contdbute to the tl:ade al:ea. Council agreed to l:evisit this issue administl:atively. HIRING OF TEMPORARY PUBLIC WORKS EMPLOYEE Public WOl:ks Supel:intendent Winkel had pl:ovided Council with a l:equest for authod ty to hil:e a full-time employee on .a temporary basis to assist the Public WOl:ks Cl:ew dUl:ing the summel: in light of the absence and uncel:tain l:etul:n of employee Fred Reed. Winkel's l:ecommendation was to extend employment to Philip Pel:l:on who has twenty yeal:S of sewel: and 'water experience. MOTION: Mahowald moved, seconded by Growe, to authol:ize the hil:ing of Philip Pel:ron as a full-time, temporary Public WOl:ks employee, effective June 1 thl:ough September' l, 1992 , at a l:ate of $11.35 pel: hour. Motion cal:ried . unanimously (5-0). j':XTENSION OF SICK LEAVE FOR, PUBLIC WORKS EMPLOYEE publi c WOl:ks Supel:intendent Winkel updated Council as to Public WOl:ks employee, Fl:ed Reed's condition. Winkel repol:ted that when he wrote his May 22, 1992 memo l:equesting Council considel: extending additional sick leave fOl: Reed he did so with the undel:standing that Reed would be l:etul:ning to work prior to the end of June; howevel:, since that memo was wl:itten, Winkel has met with Reed and questions Reed's ability to l:etUl:n to work and perfonn the duties of his job 111 the near future. Winkel stated that he has talked with Reed who undet-stands that sick leave cannot be extended indefinitely. Winkel explained since Reed's condition lS not related to a work injury, Reed is ineligible for wOl:kel:s' compensation benefits, but is collecting some disability from his insul:ance company, and has used his accrued '- . sick leave, and extended VaCal.lOn, sick leave to supplement his income. . , . , . Arden Hills Council 7 May 26, 1992 Mayor Sather commented that it is unrealistic to think that Reed could ever 11pay backlt the sick 1 ea v e already extended, and he was concerned about extending additional sick leave since there is the chance Reed will be unable to return to his job, and the City has already extended benefits beyond what Reed had accrued. The question was raised how other cities typically handle such a situation. Winkel Salct that a po~ 1 of other cities indicated that granting medical 1 eave of absence '>'I~i thout pay is a COffil1l0n practice, however, the employee would need to request that himself. Mayor Sather said he would support such leave for a finite period of time. MOTI ON: Hicks rnoved, seconded by Malone, to: 1) Ask Fred Reed to use the balance of his accrued vacation time, ~ \ Deny L ) additional extended sick leave, and 3) Request an opinion frOIT' Reed's doctor regarding an anticipated return to work date. Motion carried unanimously (5-0). i\J'_PRQVAL_ TO _PURCHASE TRACTOR Winkel referred to his Hay ~" 1992 memo on .' ' agenda . . L.L, l-nlS l L-elJl . which reported that the City has the opportunity to purchase a used 1988 Case 580-K Tractor/Backhoe, ~hich appears to be in excellent condition, having been well maintained on a routine basis, for $25,000 fl"om Perron SeHer and Water Construction Company. Winkel said the purchase price of l.ne ti."actor was $42,000 in 1988, it would sell for about $30,000 no',..,J from a dealer, and a new comparable tractor would be over $50,000. Winkel stated that the budget has $25,000 allocated for the purchase of a Bobcat, but 1-' ~.l- he would prefer to take advantage of the 'L-naL- opportunity to purchase the tractor at this time with hopes of also purcbasing a Bobcat (perhaps used) lislng f~nds saved dUl:i~-l; the year from capital expendi t'J.l:es. Councilmeffibe:~ Hic~s asked - - tl'-,-e c:i ty currently has a b::.ckhCt.; and tractol: . \'1inkel said the city curreutly does not have a backhoe, , plaL3 are tc.' use the City13 ,:urrent ti:acto:i:: as a ana trade il-~ whe~1 a Bobcat is purchased. COl..l:i1ci 1171ern}:)er Halone encouraged Winkel t.o 1 co:..: ,-l..JJ... a ~:; C' . bobee, t \.~hel: the appropriate t i iT\C: comes t ,~j Il:a~: e the p\.;;:chase. :0Lncil~ember Hicks asked :l. f Hlnr~E' 1 COU~;~:, [legot.iate c'\ :)"2..Ce 1 eS:3 thari $25/000 for the Case tractcJr. Hinke1 stated .;... -,~. ~ .;.. \....1.\0,- $25,000 is already a ve-:'j good pr i C:E: i;]:i.. \!2L t.. L.e condition and . IT:ai~-ltdnance rec:ord. Council was reminded that the purchase would not be subject to sales tax ~ .r:. transacted before June , 1992. .-'..1. ~, , Arden Hills Council 8 May 26, 1992 . MOTION: Hicks moved, seconded by Mahowald, to authorize the expenditure of $25,000 for the purchase of a 1988 Case tractor/backhoe from Perron Sewer and Water, Motion carried unanimously (5-0). AMEND JOB DESCRIPTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY Council referred to Acting Clerk Administrator Iago's May 22, 1992 memo wherein Iago suggested amending the job description of the Administrative Secretary to include serving as secretary to the Planning Commission, attending Planning Commission meetings and preparing minutes. MOTION: Malone moved. seconded by Hicks, to approve the use of Administrative Secretary Tery Shield's time as Recording Secretary for the Planning Commission and authorize the Acting Clerk Administrator to make the appropriate revlsions to the current job description. Motion carried unani~ously (5-0). ~QUNCI_L CO_MMENTS HI~TORY OF KEITHSON POND . Councilmember Hicks reported that the former City Engineering firm of SEH has promised to forward background material re9arding the history of Keithson Pond. He said he would keep Council updated on this issue. Councilmember Mahowald, having been absent from the May 11, 1992 Council meeting, asked if Council determined an assessment amount for Keithson Pond. Attorney Filla said that a range was identified, but no definite amount has yet been determined. FIREJ!EPARTMENT UPDATE Councllmember.Malone updated Council regarding the recent Lake Johanna Volunteer Fire Department Pension Fund meeting. NEVI CITY HALL INITIAL MEETING Mahowald asked if a elate has yet been scheduled for a ITieeting amongst staff and architects for the new City Hall. Ac in9 C,l erk Iago stated that arrangements have not been final zed yet, but that a morning meeting on June 10 is a possibil ty. . ~ ' . A;:-den -r:il1s Council ~ ~1ay 2 (. / 1992 ~ SCHE_DULE JUNE WQPKSESSrO~ MOTIeN: Halone moved, 3Econded OJ' :"~;,- eKS I ;," U sC:-.eclul ~: a Cc"ncil worksessiofl to be held 4:30 p. n-,.. OL June ~:) I 100"1 :".-'.''-- . Motion carried unanimously - ^' ... :::,-u,: iil)}OURli HOTTON: M " - secoIlded by Hicks, -'- ,~ adjourn the lfieet.ing ~a1.0ne rnoveC1, "_U at 8:20 p.m. Motion carried unanimously (5-0) . Thomas R. Sather, Mayor catherine u. rago, Deputy Clerk NOTICE OF MEETINGS: EThe next regular Council meeting will be held June 8, 19S,2at7:'?>C) p .1Ti. at. City Hall. The next Council worksession will be held June ' c 1992 -, 4:30 J..J, de p. rn. . - . ~ I . CITY OF 1\RDEN HILLS MEKm\NDUM. Dl\.TE: June 2, 1992 TO: Mayor and city Council catherine J. Ia<]O, Acting Clerk Mministrator rJ.. ~ FRCM: SUBJECT: Bingo Hall License Renewal - Pot-o-Gold Attached is a bingo hall license renewal application from the Pot--{)-Q)ld Bingo Hall, 3776 Connelly. RECCl-lMENDATION: staff recommends that this application be approved as requested. ACTION RIDUIRED: If Council =n=s with the staff recommendation, they should pass a motion, under Consent, approving the bingo hall license renewal application as requested, pending approval of Ramsey County Sheriff's . Department. CJIjts Attachment M92-182 . ---- ----- FOR OFFICE USE ONLY 1 Fee Date_ LG300 Chk Initial (R9'I.10l30f90) Minnesota Lawful Gambling License # . Bingo Hall License Application - Part 1 (See instructions for completion of this application) IP/.- / c1rJ '?!!-- Is this application for a new license, or a renewal? 0 New ~enewal ~- ,~ W993~ 1. Name 01 bingo hall i3IN~o l-L~ 1\ Bingo Hall Phone County (where hall is localea) C\R:Dt:;;~ W \ \ \.l;. ({,j'~) ip3J-/alt( j(f:J(I1SciY Street address ~ hall \ City or Township where hall is located State Zip code 31'10 O,vN,,;\ 1,1 Cue;. r-JR.ul;;;<.i J.ldl >;" /'rI1V -5S11~ 2. Mailing address of bingo hall City Stale Zip code 377(, CONIJ~/i-; /JUl; PI {(.uoJ I-I, \1 S- ('fliV 66/1J.. 3. Is the bingo hall located within ci~ limits? Yes No c=J If "No: indicate township in which bingo hall is located 4. Name at legal owner of bingo hall property Phone ~88 &is Lur:4I-'Sh !=\A/1) (.:J~S.Oc...IAII:.s (~Ia) - Busin'ess Mailing A~r~ S:,iCity PAul Stale . Zip Code /0/3 ON' '<:::,l" m;u '05/0.3 " 5. Names 01 an owners, officers, directors, partners, managers and supervisors (each person named must fill out a separate Bingo Hall Personnel Information form, LG315 and Affidavit, LG316) a. Lou Il~ LU ~l,...~ t-\ I. k, . b. :r oh ^-J w A I.- ~ 1.J g. I. c C;ulcl It:: 'S, l~dow h. m. d. i. n. e. j o. 6. I 1/ -r;;;:'rporation I I Sole proprietorship I I Partnership 7. Have/do any persons listed in items 4 and 5: Yes No a. been convicted of a felony? D 0 b. ever been convicted of a crime involving gambling? D 0 c. ever held a bingo hail license previously in Minnesota? CEI D d. owe delinquent taxes in excess of $500 as delined in Minnesota Statutes section 270.72? D [0" e. ever been convicted of assauit, criminal violation involving the use of a firearm, or making D 6 terroristic threats? . f. after demand, not filed tax returns required by the Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue? D ~ 8. Are any of the individuals listed in items 4 or 5, or a person holding a financial or managerial interest in the bingo hall, or affiliate thereof - D []2( a licensed distributor or affiliate of the distributor under section 349.161? . a licensed nanufacturer or affiliate of the manufacturer under section 349.163? D [0" __.L__ ---.....--- Minnesota Lamful Gambling Bingo Hall License Application (LG300) - Part 2 . I declare that this application is correct and complete to the best 01 my knowledge and beliel. I will familiarize myself with the laws of the state of Minnesota and rules of the Board regarding gambling and agree, if licensed, to abide by those laws and rules. including amendments to them. Changes in the information submitted in this application will be submitted to the Boara' and local government unit within ten days after the change occurs. 9. Sig lUre of chiel executive OIfiC2M" ~ Name (please print) Title ~. 0-- u.J ' ~~ ?;;.1. J..O<J1 -UJAL~L ?RC'i>'1>c><lT . Nam of person completing this form Title Phone /""OQ/e. u."IA L OS L- ?"lcs,'j)<--wT ( I, I~ 4lt J" ~ ;)4~ 1. The city' must sign if the bingo hall is located within city limits. 2, The county" AND township" must sign if the bingo hall is iocated within a township. 3. The locai government (city or county) must pass a resolution specifically approving or denying the appiication. - 4. A copy of the resolution approving the appiication must be attached to the application. 5. An application which is denied by the locai governing body shouid not be submitted to the Gambling Control Division. TownshIp By signature below. the township acknowledges that the organization is applying for a bingo hall license within township limits. City' or County" I Township" 11. City or county name 112. Town,h',p name IJ . Signature of person receiving application Date received Title - Township official Date received Is township? organized unorganized unincorporated D D D tt~!Ffi~~~~t~tllll!rlt'igmfgll;gqqi!1cI1Itl!iQ~~~f1if:ili~~1~\~~\~~~ili~ffifl~t~~~~~t1~ililt~ttM~1]~m\~]~flili~~ili*~i~\~~~t~*ilij!ji.~t\1~)~~~;i.t1~\1~ . Form LG300, Bingo Hall License Appiication, Parts 1 and 2 . Form LG302, Bingo Hall Occasion List . Form LG315, Bingo Hall Personnel Information (for each person listed in item 4 and 5 on form LG300) . Form LG316, Bingo Hall Affidavit, (for each person iisted in item 4 and 5 on form LG300) . Check for license fee of $2,500, made payable to "State of Minnesota" Department of Gaming Gambling Control Division Rosewood Plaza South, 3rd Floor 1711 W. County Road B Roseviiie, MN 55113 . - m -- -- ~FalM08l 816 carbunle9M r' OF ARDEN HILLS 4 ] Wes( Highway 96 tD N HilLS, MN 5511Z . ~ ~ F;> ::0 0:; -I ()~ ~ ;:IC Cz. Q. mn." Co !!!.m m ~ z...,)> < n ,,~ () () ~m 0 c - z -n"'CI -< <3 -t 3 03: n () AlO ~ ~ Oz n I ~~ ,..; :c 0 ::< , 0 . 0 Q .., V> Y> CD .-.....~ l C'-.) en I . . CITY OF ARDEN HILLS MEHIU\NDUM Il1d'E : June 4, 1992 TO: Mayor and City COtmcil. ,{'"/' I' FRCM: John Buckley, Parks & Recreation Director') SUBJECT: Change order for Hazelnut Park Trail Project In conjunction with the Hazelnut Park Trail Project, there are areas that could be paved to enhance this trail system; these include a 150 ft section of trail to connect Prior Ave to the Hazelnut trail loop, and a 100 ft section of roadway in the park which joins the tennis court and play structure. Bituminous Construction Company has indicated a willingness to do the additional work at the same rate quoted in the CUmmings Trail bid. since excess materials were not removed from the CUmmings Trail project, the City realized a $960 cost savings. Additional costs for the . enhancements proposed above should not exceed $1,500, and the original contract for the CUmmings Trail improvement was bid at $21,321.90, which is a $3,000 savings from the bJdgeted amount of $26,523. RE:CCJ>lMENDATION : If Council concurs, they should pass a motion under Consent to approve Change Order No.1 in the amount of $1,500.00, f= a total contract cost $22,821.90 for the completion of the Hazelnut Park Trail Improvement Project with the enhancements outlined. - JB:rk . , , . CITY OF ARDEN HILIB MEXIWlDUM DATE: JUne 5, 1992 ro: Mayor and city CoWlCil FIlCH: Jom Buckley, Parks , Recreation Director ~ rJ' SllB.:JECT : 1991 Auditor Report Regarding P.l.VYLcWl Fund As directed by Council, Terry Post and I have researched the 1991 Auditor's report concerning the 1991 Pro::Jraln Fund deficit. The 1991 expenses over budget occurred in two main areas, Instl:uctor fees and Building SUpervision costs. :Mr. Post's report is more detailed and provides the expenditure infonnation and comparison over the last 3 years. If you have questions, Terry and I will be available to discuss at the Council meeting. . JB:rk - . - . . CITY OF ARDEN HILLS MEXIU\NOOM DM'E: J\me 4, 1992 TO: John Buckley, Park , Recreation Director ~:-4P Terry Post, Temporary City 1lccoUntant SUBJECT: 1991 Recreation Program (Fund 226) Deficit At the May 26, 1992 Council meeting, staff was directed to analyze the deficit Fund 226 in=ed in 1991. The fund had budgeted and actual revenues and expenditures as follows: ACIUAL 1991 BUDGEl' DFSCRIPI'ION 1989 1990 1991 BUIX;El' VAR 1992 REVENUE : -chgs for Services 55066 59985 77818 79275 <1457> 72590 PCI' Chg Prev Yr. 8.9% 29.7% 32.2% <6.7%> . -other Income 1634 7886 1984 1630 354 2670 -t'I'otal Revenue 56700 67871 79802 80905 <1103> 75260 wlo Transfer EXPENDITURES : -SUpplies 9210 10018 9072 10870 1798 14079 PCI' of Svc Fees 16.7% 16.7% 11. 7% 13.7% 19.4% -Instructor Fees 26921 32985 37170 25000 <12170> 22000 Tenp Salaries + FICA -0- -0- 65 -0- < 65> 11842 - SUbtotal Inst. 26921 32985 37235 25000 <12235> 33842 PCI' SVc Fees 48.9% 55.0% 47.8% 31.5% 46.6% -other dlgs & Svcs 7913 12029 15009 10530 < 4479> 15545 PCI' Svc Fees 14.4% 20.1% 19.3% 13.3% 21.4% -Admin + Park Sal 15570 31545 44377 43162 < 1215> 47959 PCI' SVc Fees 28.3% 52.6% 57.0% 54.4% -Fringe Benefits 2957 6344 8602 8372 < 230> 8146 PCI' SVc Fees + Total Expenditures 62571 92921 114295 97934 <16361> 119899 ANALYSIS In reviewing the above data, two significant budget vs. actual deviations are apparent: lliS'IRUClDRS FEFS . Actual expenditures of $37,170 =eated an unfavorable variance of $12,170. The 1991 budgeted amount of $25,000 appears to be significantly low in light of history (Le.; Instructors Fees as a . 1991 Recreation Program (Fund 226) Deficit Page Two percent of service fees averaged 52% in the two proceeding years), and the projected revenue :in=ease (Le.; revenue fees in=easing by 32% over previous year and Instructor fees decreasinCJ by 33%). OI'HER CHARGES & SERVICES '!he rell'aining 1991 budget in this category excluding Instructor fees was $10,500. Actual expenditures were $15,009, =eating a $4,509 unfavorable variance. '!he major source of the deviations are charges from Independent School District for building supervision fees. It appears that this variance sterns from both inconsistent a=ual treatment between 1990 and 1991 [specifically, in 1990 invoices for Fall 1989 and winter 1990 were charged to this expenditure category; while in 1991, invoices for Fall 1990, Winter 1991 and Fall 1991 ($1695.61)] and higher fees being charged by Independent School District #621. CDNCWSION It appears that the 1991 Program Fund deficit has its primary cause in an unrealistically low 1991 J:udget expenditure aJroUllt for Instructor Fees. '!he 1992 budget amount for this category seems reasonable. TP/rk . - . . CITY OF ~EN HILLS MEMCIlANOOM ~: JUne 4, 1992 TO: Mayor and City council FRCM: Dan Winkel, Public works superintendent cM SUBJECT: 1991 street Budget cost over-runs As per the change order that was approved by Council on June 18, 1991, the Pavement Management J:udget was increased to approxilnately $155,600. There was $125,000 in the J:udget for 1991- This increase was due to the fact that Chatham Court, Chatham Circle and Valentine Avenue were added to the program after the original budget was ear-marked for other over- lay and seal coating projects. If the council should have any further questions, I will be at the council meeting on June 8, or please feel free to contact me at any time. . I:W:rk - . ---..-- ". , . CITY OF ARDEN HILLS MEH:IWlOOM D1d'E : June 5, 1992 TO: Mayor & Council cJ- FRCM: Catherine J. Iage, Acting Clerk Mministrator ~: Request for Deferment of Special ASsessments, staff has reviewed the application for Deferment of Special Assessments of the Tiller lime Iriprovement for Mrs. Betty J. Farr, 3327 Dunlap street. Mrs. Farr has met age and hardship =iteria as set forth in Resolution No. 79-46. staff, therefore, recarmnends that Council approve the Deferral of Special Assessments related to the Tiller lane Improvement. TIle taxpayer has been advised of the conditions that would tenninate the deferral and has agreed to provide copies of the most recent tax return . on an armual basis to detennine if financial hardship exists in future periods . ACrION RIDUIRED: If Council concurs, they should pass a motion under Consent to approve the deferment and the information will then J::e forwarded to Ramsey County. TP/ts - . . . . APPLICATION FOR DEFERMENT OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS To the City Council of the city of Arden Hills, Ramsey county, Minnesota. (Applicant) being first duly sworn deposes and states: 1. That the Applicant is the owner the following described real estate located in he city Arden Hills, Ramsey County, nnesota: ~ . 2 . Pursuant to Minn. stat. S435.192, et. seq. and the Arden Hill assessment manual, Applicant requests deferral of the payment of special assessment for the /( ., ~ .5("c~ improvement. 3 . In support of this request, Applicant represents as follows: e Applicant is over 65 years of age; b. Applicant is permanently and totally disabled as follows: . . c. Applicant's adjusted gross income is SA. 9.5l. ...1:J.. 4. Applicant declares that the foregoing information is true and correct and agrees to immediately inform the Arden Hills Clerk Administrator should any of the foregoing information change, and agrees that if the deferral is granted, Applicant will immediately upon termination of the deferral pay to ~~i~ the deferred as sment with interest. aJvV _Dated b / '/ ,;z Subscribed ands60rn to 0 RENEE M. KAUlFUSS before me this :o~ day ,,'::IT ARY PUBlIC.MINNESOTA of , -30-9&9 /ff/;r II"NNEPIN COUNTY ~.:y Commission Expires a-;..97 /Jf~ .~- , -- -, . _.~...- , , . CITY OF ARDEN lULLS MEH:&l1lNOOM DATE : June 5, 1992 '10: Mayor and city Co1.UlCil :FRCI!:: cindy 8eI1ertson, P.l.VYLaIII SUpervisor ~'vS stJl3.:Jrel' : SUnmer Staff 'Ihe following is a list of recommended hires for seasonal positions: ll.1ba Vanyo Playground SUperVisor $8.00/hr. CherylSandbakken Playground Leader $5.50/hr. Heather McClung Playground Leader $5.50/hr. Ball Skills Instructor $8.00/hr. Kelly Lieser Playground Leader $5.50/hr. Gymnastics Instructor $8.00/hr. . Kelly Gehrke Playground Leader $5. 25/hr. Mark Farr Playground Leader $5. 25/hr. Ball Skills Instructor $8.00/hr. Soccer Instructor $8.00/hr. Rllonda Waage Playground Leader $5. 25/hr. COrey stennes Softba.ll Unpire $7.50/hr. - Julie wild Tennis Instruct= $8.00/hr. Soccer Instructor $8.00/hr. Beth Sawicki Tennis Instructor $7.50/hr. Kathy Casper Ceramics Instructor $11. 25/hr. Rob Carley Golf Instructor $12.00/student stepping stone 'Iheatre Acting Workshop $25.00/Session/Hour Lisa Torborg swimming Instructor $8.00/hr. Soccer Instructor $8.00/hr. Michelle Jolmson Ball Skills Instruct= $8.00/hr. . Dean Berkes Fishing Instructor $8.00/hr. , ) . StlMMm STAFF P1\GE TliO Kathleen Hollar Keyboard Instructor $10.00 Session REO::t-1MENDATION: staff recommends hiring the above individuals at the salaries listed. ACI'ION REOUIRED: If Council =n=s with the staff recornmerrlation, they should pass a motion, under Consent, approving the above listed individuals & salaries for seasonal employees. CS/ts . - . . . CITl! OF ARDEN HILLS MElUl1lNDUM DATE: JUne 6, 1992 TO: Mayor and City council FIlCH: catherine J. Iago, ACti1lg Clerk 1Idmi.nistrator cJ- SUBJECT: Keithson Area Pond storm SeWer Il11prOVEIDeI1ts Attached is a report dated June 3, 1992, from Engineer Mark Graham regarding the Keithson Area Pond stonn Sewer Inprovement and assessment hearing . Also attached is a copy of Resolution No. 92-41 Adopting the Final Assessment Roll and a list of properties. A letter from Attorney Filla regarding the status of the easement negotiations with Mr. Reiling is subnitted and a request for the City to issue a check in the amount $16,680.00 to secure the easement was verbally suhnitted. 'IWo residents have subnitted written objections to the proposed assessment: Robert D. stennes, 4540 Keithson Drive and Rainer G. . Rocheleau, 4503 Keithson Drive. The letters are attached. At the close of the public hearing, Council should adopt Resolution No. 92-41 Adopting the Final Assessment Roll with any changes recommended by staff member or the city Attorney. CJI/ts Attachments - . . CONSULTING ENGINEERS Maier Stewart & Associates Inc. MEMO TO: ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL FROM: MARK J. GRAHAM piG- RE: KEITHSON AREA POND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS FILE NO: 520-029-20 DATE: JUNE 3, 1992 The assessment hearing for the Keithson Area Pond Storm Sewer Improvements is scheduled for the June 8, 1992 City Council meeting. As directed, a preliminary assessment roll has been prepared with a proposed assessment of $1500 per lot. This $1500 amount has been chosen based on the advice of the City's real estate appraiser. A copy of the preliminary assessment roll, dated May 18, 1992, is attached. The current status of this project is that the low bidder, Machtemes Construction, Inc. has been . awarded the project contingent on acquiring the right to enter Mr. George Reiling's property. City Attorney Filla has started condemnation proceedings through Ramsey County District Court to obtain this easement. The City will have access to the private property once the amount of the City's appraisal is provided to Mr. Reiling. An easement has also been obtained, at no cost, from the property owner south of the pond, Mr. George Crimmins, to construct the improvements. The Contractor would be able to begin as soon as the praper paperwork is completed and a preconstruction conference could be held. Following the close of the assessment hearing, it would be appropriate for the City Council to adopt a final assessment rol1. A resolution is attached for your review and consideration. The resolution has been prepared at an interest rate of 8.00% and a pay-back period of five years. As of this writing, the City has not received any formal written assessment appeals from property owners. Individuals may appeal this project by presenting a signed, written objection to the Mayor at the hearing. An individual standing up at the public hearing indicating their objection to this project does not constitute as assessment appeal. Following the submission of the signed, written objection, the property also has to serve Notice of Appeal upon the Mayor or City Administrator within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment roll and must file this notice with the District Court within 10 days after serving the Mayor or City Administrator. Both myself and City Attorney Filla will be in attendance at the June 8, 1992 City Council meeting. Please contact me if you have any questions. MJG/ks attch. . 029-0301.JUN 1959 SLOAN PLACE. SUITE 200. ST. PAUL. MINNESOTA 55117 612-774-6021 9800 SHELARO PARKWAY. SUITE 102. MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESorA 55441 612-546-0432 . Equal Opportunity Employer --...--- . CITY OF ARDEN HILLS RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 92- 41 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL WHEREAS, upon due notice properly made as required by law, the Arden Hills City Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the 1992 Keithson Area Pond Improvements and has determined the amount to be assessed against each individual property as the Council deems just; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Conncil of the City of Arden Hills, Minnesota: 1. The final assessment roll, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, is hereby accepted and adopted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands therein names. Each such tract of land in the assessment roll is hereby found to be benefited by the improvement in an amount not less than the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments, including both principal and interest, amortized in such amount annually as is required to pay the principal with interest at 8.00% over a period of five years. . 3. The owner of any property so assessed, may, at any time prior to certification to the County Auditor of the assessment or the first installment thereof, pay to the City Treasurer the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment; except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days after the adoption of this Resolution. Prepayment may also be made after the certification of the assessment or first installment thereof by paying to the City Treasurer/County Auditor the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid with interest. In the case of a payment made before November 15, interest will be calculated through December 31 of the year in which payment is made. If payment is made after November 15, interest will be calculated through December 31 of the next succeeding year. - 4. The City Administrator shall transmit to the County Auditor a certified duplicate of the attached assessment roll to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such assessment shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Passed and adopted this 8th day of June, 1992 ATIEST: Thomas R. Sather, Mayor Catherine J. Iago Acting Clerk-Administrator . .-- '-"--'---~---------- ._-_.~--~--- ---- -~_.._----~ . - PREt::I1'IINAR. ASSESSI'lE!lllRotr-FORJl:IETHSmMlR-;--- --_..~-----_._._------~ - STORM SEWER POND IMPROVEMENTS -- CITY OF ARDEN HILLS MAY 18, 1992 -.--- .-- -- ---..-- -_._~-~ -.-. ---~-_.--- _.._-----~- ~-- ~~ - - , --..-..- FROl"05ED LEGAL "J - PIN NUMBER NAME ASSESSMENT DESCRIPTION - ---~_._- - -------~._. --.-.... ., . KIETHSON DRIVE- HIGHWAY 96 TO DEAD END SOUTH i ~ $: --------------------:------------------------:-------------:--------------------: h! ~t..IUHN LAWlc.t( . .LUI:J. I & 2. . , . . ~! 22-30-23-22-0025 :4539 KIETHSON DRIVE , $1,500.00 :BLOCK 1 . . , :ARDEN HILLS, MN. 55112 , :KIETHSON ADDITION . ,-, , . :' ~! ____________________-r-:--:- - ----- . ----- - -' . , . . ~ :RICHARD FOSTER , :LOT 3 . , . 22-30-23-22-0012 :4527 KIETHSON DRIVE . $1,500.00 :BLOCK 1 , - , . ;A~~c.N HILL:J., nN. ~:)llL . .~!eIH~UN ADDrTTON , h . . -- ____________________1________________________,_____________1____________________1 :,,:,1 , , , . - :MARK !'lAGERS , :LOTS 4 & PART OF 5 , -- . . LA! SO .c!.j ~:l-OOLtf ~45Zl"-1ITETHSuN IJIU Ve . $1,500.00-;~LU~~ 1 -----.- -- , . -- :ARDEN HILLS, !'IN. 55112 , :KIETHSON ADDITION , . . . ____________________1________________________1_____________1____________________, . . , . : bt.UHbt. t.,;KlrJ"1t~ . :LOI 6 :'0; . , --< 22-30-23-22-0015 :4509 KIETHSON DRIVE , $1,500.00 :BLOCK 1 , :;1 , . &29 :ARDEN HILLS, /'IN. 55112 . :KIETHSON ADDITION , :;.,:;; , , _________________~~r - - '- _._'..~=-=-_--::..---- , . , , . , - :RAINER ROCHELEAU , :lOT 7 , . , . -- 22-30-23-22-0027 :4503 KIETHSON DRIVE , $1,500.00 :BlOCK 1 . 3~ ' , . ,,' ;H~Vc.N HiLL:J., nN. ~:tllL . ;~lc.JH:J.UN AvDTTTON . , . ~ ____________________1________________________1_____________1____________________. 35i , . , . :ROBERT STE"-"ES , :LOT 2 , ~':;I . , ~ _ ~~-.)\I-~s-~~-\IOTIl-i1l51J\I "Ie I H:iUN IJKIVe . u,:'O\l.OO :(jlOC~ . :ARDEN HILLS, "N. 55112 , :KIETHSON ADDITION . .3ai . , ,. ; , ~ ______.;;;.__________' __________________.;...1__________....;:1 _______________.....::....:c~.., ;33j , , , . ~ ;rJILHHtL tllc.L . fLU1 .) , . . 22-30-23-22-0019 :4534 KIETHSON DRIVE . $1,500.00 :BLOCK 2 , :,1'j , , '.4::; :ARDEN HIllS, /'IN. 55112 , :KIETHSON ADDITION , . . -------------------~--------------------~-- , _'______--- , ~:;: . , . . ~ :ROBERT HILL , :lOT 4 , . . - 22-30-23-22-0020 :4528 KIETHSON DRIVE , $1,500.00 :BlOCK 2 , -- . , ;.:S! ;AKVc.N H~LL~, n~. 5:>1 12 :KIETHSON ADDITiON . , , ~ ____________________._______________________1_____________1____________________, , . , . - :JI!'I ANDERSON . :lOT 5 , -::' , . ~L-..jV-L,)-LL-UVLl ;q~L~ "lE1H50NlDRiVE , tl,5~0 :DLOCK 2 . 4;. , . - :ARDEN HILLS. "N. 55112 . :KIETHSON ADDITION , 5C: . , --------------______1______------------______1______---____1____________________1 5" , . , . , , , , 22-30-23-22-0022 :4516 KIETHSON DRIVE , $1,500.00 :BLOCK 2 . , I , . , :s41 :ARDEN HIllS, /'IN. 55112 , :KIETHSON ADDITION . , . -------------------~ -- ----- -- '- - -- , S5i . . . . \ ~ -- r. . .' PROPOSED LEGAL PIN NU"BER NA"E ASSESS"ENT DESCRIPTION I , I ~ ; '-.... I I j I --------------------,------------------------1-------------.--------------------. -- :RON HORWATH : :LOT 7 : 22 30 23-22""0023 :4~10 KIETHSOtll DRIIIE : $1.;)00.00 :!lLllEK-2 :-~- ~ :ARDEN HILLS. "N. 55112: ' :KIETHSON ADDITION : ~ --------------------:------------------------:-------------:--------------------: ;,.,; ; RllN foI::LSDN ; :t:trr-ll : "~ 22-30-23-22-0024 :4504 KIETHSON DRIVE : .1.:"00.00 :BLOCK 2 : ~; :ARDEN HILLS. "N. 55112 : :KIETHSON ADDITION : ,--. ________ - I ___ __ I ___ I ____. ___ _ 3i . .' I ~ "'.'j>jl,'" ,. n ;~a ~ "="Cl ~'l ~ "'31 ,....., ;..:;1 : ' ~=.i t :.23- ;34 ,.. - " ~ r--; ,~:; ~ !34 '4 ~ ~ Is:1 ,: >" ,~ .:::./{.' (,,07 ~ 20 PETERSON, FRAM & BERGMAN tREAL PROPERTY lAW SPECIALIST WARREN E. PETERSON PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION *ALSO ADMITTED IN FLORIDA, JE:ROME 1'. FILLA ILLINOIS, WASHINGTON D.C., DANIEL WITI' FRAl'>'1 300 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUiLDING WISCONSIN GLENN A. BERGMAN 50 EAST FIFTH STREET - JOHN MICHAEL MILLER OF COUNSEL . GARY W. BECKER* ST. PAUL, MINNESUIA 55101.]]97 MELVIN.J.,.~ TIMOTHY J. HASSETTt - fi\\0"'-'" '-'. , MICHAEL T. OBERLE ~~ -"<r"\"'" (6U) 291-8955 ,,-~ "a\SI\\ 1\"'-' '.' FAX NO, (6U) 228.1753 1\ r" ;,\.=~,.?"k?.::"."'~': 'I, May 27, 1992 1'\" 1-\\ '_ Mark GrahUlll ill \' , .-.- .~ I..j~"-:"~"";'l & J ~;j;';",..., ..: Maier stewart and Associates, Inc. . ....:) Slf,'\,-,H t". ....'.... . :".1, l-~" ___---~..... 1959 Sloan Place ,...,.,....,u......-- St. Paul, MN 55117 BY FACSIMILE AND U.S. MAIL RE: City of Arden Hills vs. George J. Reiling et al. District Court File No.: C6-91-12953 Our File No.: 11550/920001 Mark: Since the City's attempts to negotiate an Easement with Mr. Reiling were unsuccessful, the above-captioned Condemnation Proceeding was commenced in Ramsey County District Court. The . Easement areas which you have described on the Reiling property will be acquired through this process. I also served a Notice of Intent to Possess in connection with the Condemnation Proceeding. As soon as we tender to Mr. Reiling the amount of the City's appraisal, the City will be allowed to enter on the Reiling property for the purpose of constructing the improvement project. I have ordered the appropriate check from the City of Arden Hills. If you have any questions, please contact me. - Very truly yours, /...~ I ~~ JPF:bap L-~~~ ~i11a . . ~ . June 1, 1992 City of Arden Hills 1450 W. Highway 96 Arden Hills, MN 55115 Attention: City Administration Re: 1992 Keithson Area Holding Pond and Storm Sewer Improvements City Administration This is to serve as written notice to my objection to the assessment on my property at . 4540 Keithson Drive. It is unrealistic to think that the City can assess individual property owners for mistakes that the City Council, the City Engineer, the water shed district and the developer made in designing, installing and releasing the original project. Further more, the topography of my property has storm water flowing north to highway 96 and not to the Keithson road area. I am appealing my assessment at the June 8th meeting and will continue to appeal any assessments levied for this project. Sincerely, C2~- D A./1'-'1U~ ~ND ))!t1 of s,ANc ~ Robert D. Stennes 4540 Keithson Drive ~~ Arden Hills, MN 55112 - . ^^i.J\.\^^^I'..".r,r,^/'.'v,,'\^^/' "^^^^/'.',.~ ,\^MM. ~ x!'-~, m::iETH H. RADEMACHER I ~<~;Lfitlli) NOTARY PUBLIC-MINNESOTA :< ...::tS...) WASHINGTON COuNTY ~ My Comm. ExpIres/we:. 6, 1992 . VVI/VVVV\/vvvvvvvvvvvWVvVWVVI/VVVW l( . ~'t:~ ~/L%d ~ ~ . .... . Rainer G. Rocheleau 4503 Keithson Drive Arden Hills, MN 55112 June 3, 1992 City Administrator City Hall 1450 W. Hwy 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112 Dear City Administrator: This is a written objection to the assessment for me and other members of Keithson Drive regarding the 1992 Keithson area holding pond and storm sewer improvement. I would like to make my oral objection at the upcoming meeting dated, June 8, 1992 . . Sincerely, 'UL 0cu~~ I "- R. G. Rocheleau, M.D. RGR:jkc - RECEIVSO .JUN 05 1992 . ~xi . , . CITY OF ARDEN HILLS . MEMCmlNOOM Dl\.TE : June 5, 1992 TO: Mayor and City Council ^ W FRCM: catherine J. Iago I 1\Ctillq Clerk Mministrator SUBJECT: Public Hearings for street ImproveIlIents - RoUnd lake Road West and Dunlap street Attached is a report dated June 3, 1992, fram Engineer Mark Graham regarding 1992 Round Lake Road West and Dunlap street Recycling Inprovements . ACrION RIDUIRID: After the close of the public hearings, Council should adopt the following resolutions: ROUND lAKE ROAD WEST IMPROVEMENI': . Resolution No. 92-37 Ordering the Irrprovement in the Matter of the 1992 Round Lake Road West Inprovement and Resolution No. 92-38 Approving the Plans and Specifications and Ordering the Advertisement for Bids in the matter of the 1992 Round Lake Road West Irrprovement. ~,tf'O DUNUIP SI'REEI' IMPROVEMENT: Resolution No. 92-39 Ordering the Improvement 1992 Dunlap street Improvement and Resolution - Plans and Specifications and Ordering the Adv in the matter of the 1992 Dunlap street Inprovement,s. CJI/ts Attaclnnents . . CONSULTING ENGINEERS Maier Stewart & Associates Inc. MEMO TO: ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL FROM: MARK J. GRAHAM (VI&' RE: 1992 ROUND LAKE ROAD WEST AND DUNLAP STREET RECYCLING IMPROVEMENTS FILE NO: 520-034-20 AND 520-035-20 DATE: JUNE 3, 1992 The public hearings for street recycling improvements on Round Lake Road West and Dunlap Street are separately scheduled for the June 8, 1992 City Council meeting. Plans and specifications for this project have been prepared and are enclosed. We can provide a brief presentation at each public hearing regarding the scope and anticipated schedule for the project. . Following the close of each public hearing, it would be appropriate to consider the attached resolutions ordering the improvement, approving the plans and specifications and ordering advertisement of bids. For each project, the resolution ordering the improvement should be considered first. These bids would be available at the July 13, 1992 City Council meeting. The estimated construction cost, based on Ramsey County information, for Round Lake Road West is $70,200 and for Dunlap Street is $38,200. Given that both projects are identical in construction, we intend to bid them as one project with separate bid schedules. Folowing receipt of bids, the next step would be to set a date to hold an assessment hearing for each project. I will be in attendance at the June 8, 1992 City Council meeting to further discuss this matter. Please contact me if you have any questions. MJG/ks attch. 035-030l.JUN . 1959 SLOAN PLACE. SUITE 200. ST. PAUL. MINNESOTA 55117 612-774-6021 9800 SHELARO PARKWAY. SUITE 102. MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55441 612.546.0432 . Equal Opportunity Employer -- . CITY OF ARDEN HILLS RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 92- 37 - A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENT IN THE MATTER OF THE 1992 ROUND LAKE ROAD WEST IMPROVEMENT WHEREAS, a public hearing relating to the 1992 Round Lake Road West Improvement was held before the Arden Hills City Council after ten days mailed notice and two weeks published notice of the hearing was given; and WHEREAS, the City Council has duly considered the Feasibility Report and those matters presented at the public hearing by those persons desiring to be heard on the matter; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arden Hills, Minnesota: 1. The 1992 Round Lake Road West Improvements for cold in-place recycling is hereby ordered as recommended in the Feasibility Report dated April 8, 1992. Passed and adopted this 8th day of June, 1992. . ATTEST: Thomas R. Sather, Mayor Catherine J. Iago Acting Clerk-Administrator - . . CITY OF ARDEN HILLS RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 92- 38 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING THE ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS IN THE MATTER OF THE 1992 ROUND LAKE ROAD WEST IMPROVEMENT WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution 92-26, the Project Engineer has prepared plans and specifications for the 1992 Round Lake Road West Improvement, which plans and specifications have been reviewed by the City; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arden Hills, Minnesota: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, are hereby approved. 2. The City Administrator shall prepare and obtain the publication of an advertisement for bids for the making of the improvement pursuant to the attached plans and specification. The advertisement shall be published one each week for three consecutive weeks, shall specify the work to be done, and shall state that the bids will be received by the City Administrator until 10:00 a.m. on July 9, 1992, at which time the bids will be publicly opened in the Council chambers of the City Hall by the City Administrator and the Project . Engineer and will then be tabulated for the consideration by the City Council at a meeting thereof at 7:30 o'clock in the p.m. on July 13, 1992, in the City Council chambers at City Hall. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the City Administrator and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond, or certified check payable to the City Administrator in the amount of 5 % of the amount of snch bid. Passed and adopted this 8th day of June, 1992. - ATTEST: Thomas R. Sather, Mayor Catherine J. Iago Acting Clerk-Administrator . -------- . CITY OF ARDEN HILLS RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 92- 40 - A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING THE ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS IN THE MATTER OF THE 1992 DUNLAP STREET IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution 92-33, the Project Engineer has prepared plans and specifications for the 1992 Dunlap Street Improvements, which plans and specifications have been reviewed by the City; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arden Hills, Minnesota: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, are hereby approved. 2. The City Administrator shall prepare and obtain the publication of an advertisement for bids for the making of the improvement pursuant to the attached plans and specification. The advertisement shall be published one each week for three consecutive weeks, shall specify the work to be done, and shall state that the bids will be received by the City Administrator until 10:00 a.m. on July 9, 1992, at which time the bids will be publicly . opened in the Council chambers of the City Hall by the City Administrator and the Project Engineer and will then be tabulated for the consideration by the City Council at a meeting thereof at 7:30 o'clock in the p.m. on July 13, 1992, in the City Council chambers at City Hall. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the City Administrator and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond, or certified check payable to the City Administrator in the amount of 5 % of the amount of such bid. Passed and adopted this 8th day of June, 1992. - ATTEST: Thomas R. Sather, Mayor Catherine 1. Iago Acting Clerk-Administrator . . CITY OF ARDEN HILLS RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 92- 39 - A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENT IN THE MATTER OF THE 1992 DUNLAP STREET IMPROVEMENT WHEREAS, a public hearing relating to the 1992 Dunlap Street Improvement was held before the Arden Hills City Council after ten days mailed notice and two weeks published notice of the hearing was given; and WHEREAS, the City Council has duly considered the Feasibility Report and those matters presented at the public hearing by those persons desiring to be heard on the matter; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arden Hills, Minnesota: 1. The 1992 Dunlap Street Improvements for cold in-place recycling is hereby ordered as recommended in the Feasibility Report dated May 6, 1992. Passed and adopted this 8th day of June, 1992. . ATTEST: Thomas R. Sather, Mayor Catherine J. Iago Acting Clerk-Administrator - . . CITY OF ARDEN HILLS INFClIOO\TIClWIL MEMORANDUM DATE: June 8, 1992 'lU: Mayor & City council FRCM: catherine J. Iago, Actillq Clerk Administrator Attorney 'Iharnas Balyk, representing Dermis Foster, will J:::e present at the Council meeting this evening. I advised Mr. Balyk he could J:::e heard under Public Comments. Mr. Balyk indicated he will J:::e requesting placement on the June 15 Worksession Agenda to discuss the Foster Plarming Commission Application. CJI/ts . - ! --- \ , \ " --- I "_ ,-/ _,{i"';' ,-, . r " JUH 03 '92 1f,:E15 PETERSOi'l FRRr1 BERGMf'I 110 P01 PETERSON, FRAM & BERGMAN tREAL PROr'DITY u..w sn:CI.ALIST wARREN E.. pETI:RSQN PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION t..u.so ADMITTED uo," WISCONSIN JEROME P. FILU t.USO A.OMITI"ED IN Il..UNOIS, lW<IEL wm FRAM .)0() MIDWESt J'EDEJlAL BlI'IUlING n..mUD...., WASHINGroI'll' D.C. , Gu:NN A. BERGMAN ~ EAST nrm S"Ilt.ttT - JOHN MlCHAll MDJ.EIt S'L PAUL. MINNESarA S51Ol.ll97 OF COUNSEL GARY W. BECKER*: MELVIN J. SiLVER TIMOTHY J. 1iASScrr> - MlCHAEL'T. OBERLE 16U) 291_5 fAX NO. (6U) 228-17.!:l FAX COVER LETTER Fax Number: (612) 228-1753 ( Date: " 3-1/2- Time: i!/,//J Please deliver the following pages to: t!~AA~ 4-c-~ t? From: Q/, ~ . Total nu~er of pages including this cover letter: tJ~7fstj - , File Name: File Number/Matter # /j5l5tf~l- / /3!iP ! Sent by: . This transmission consists of confidential information which is intended and designated only for the person named above. If you receive this transmission by mistake, please call 612-291-8955 (collect) and request the fax operator. v\forms\ fax..l tr 6/13/91 ~' .- JUt--l [1] 192 1t:.: E16 PETERSON FRi=II1 BERGI1R 110 P02 PETERSON, FRAM & BERGMAN tREAL PROPERn' u. w SPEClA.LIST WARREN E. PETERSON PROFESSJONAL ASSOCIATION .ALSO ADMITTED I~ FLORIDA, JEROME p, HLLA ILLINOIS. WASHINGTOl' D.C., , DANIEL WIT[ FRA~l ;.w.o MJDWES'f FEDERAL BUlLDl~G WISCONSIN GLENN A. BERGMAl' ~ EAST FIFTH STREET - JOH.N MICHA[).. MILLER OF COU;-.;SEL GARY \~: BECI\J2R. ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101.1197 MELVIN J. SILVER TJM,OTH\' J. liA.SSETlt - MICHAEL T. OBERLE. l6U) 291.8955 FAX NO, (,Il) 228.1153 June 3, 1992 Catherine 1ago City Administrator City of Arden Hills 1450 West Highway 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112 BY FACSIMILE AND U.S. MAIL RE: Development Moratorium Interim Ordinance Our File No.: 10450/920001 t' Cathy: It is my understanding that the City is currently undertaking a comprehensive review of its zoning regulations and is concerned . about its obligation to review development applications which will be impacted by pending changes to the City's official controls. The City has the authority to halt development until it completes its review of the zoning regulations. In order to implement a development moratorium, it would be necessary for the ~ity to adopt an Ordinance which specifies that the City is conducting studies and/or is scheduling public hearings to consider amendments to its comprehensive plan or official controls and that a development moratorium is necessary in order to - protect the planning process and the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of the City of Arden Hills. The Ordinance may halt development for one year and may be extended for up to eighteen additional months. , The Ordinance would become effective following the date of publication. However, the Ordinance cannot delay subdivisions which preliminary approval has been given prior to the date of the interim Ordinance. effective th ~.he ?rdinanc~ should be considered at a public hearing before e :!.ty s Plann:!.ng Commission. The Public Hearing should be preceded by ten days published notice. The Ordinance must be ~pproved by th~ee affirmative votes of the City Council. If ou ave any quest:!.ons, please contact me. y . JPF:bap -- , . MINUTES OF THE ARDEN HILLS PLANNING cnwsslOO MEEl'ING . ~Y, JUNE 3, 1992, 7:30 P.M. - CITY HALL C1\LL TO ORDER: OJ.air Probst called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. ROLL C1\LL: Present: OJ.air Dennis Probst, Members Dave Carlson, Barbara Piotrowski, steve Edckson, Jeanne winiecki, Scott Petersen and Council Liaison Thomas Mahowald. Absent: Member Raymond McGraw. Also present: Plarmer John Bergly, Acting Clerk Administrator Catherine lago, and Recording Secretary Tery Shields. APPROVE MINUTES: Petersen !roved, seconded by Erickson, to approve the May 6, 1992, Planning Minutes as suhnitted. All voted in favor. (6-0) POBLIC HEl\RIN3 - C1\SE #92-06: SUP 1\MEI!DIENT WITH V1lRIAN::ES. 1306 W. ro. ROAD E. NDJO OIL CXJoIPANY: OJ.air Probst opened the meeting at 7:32 p.m. for the purpose of a public hearing on Case #92-06, SUP Amendment with variances, 1306 W. Co. Road E, Amxo oil CC:atq:lally. . Acting Clerk Administrator Catherine Iago confirmed the publication of the Notice of Hearing in the New Briahton Bulletin on Wednesday, May 20, and mailing to affected property owners on Tuesday, May 19. Planner Bergly referred to his report dated 6-03-92, and explained the applicant proposes to amend SUP 86-27, to alleM the present car wash to be converted into a third service bay, and anew, enlarged car wash to be attached to the east side of the existing structure. The application also requires granting a 10-foot side yard variance from the east property line, twenty feet is required for a _principal building and 10 feet is proposed. The variance would be from the requlations listed in Sec. VI, C, (2), (a), 3., of the zoning Code, which requires a minimum of 15 feet for a rear yard landscape area. The Planner reviewed the history of SUP 86-27 that alleMed the present car wash and required miscellaneous site irrprovements. The present application needs to address the folleMing issues: 1. Does the conversion of the existing car wash into a service bay and the addition of a new car wash make the use t= intense for the site? 2. Have all the coooitions of the 86-27 SUP been addressed? 3. Are there alternatives that do not require the side yard and landscaped rear yard variances proposed? 4. Will parking provided be adequate for the expanded use? 5. Will the circulation pattel:n add to the on-site congestion = help . minimize it? Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Planning Camlission Meeting , 6-3-92 . Page 2 ~E #92-06 (CONT'DI: The Planner also reviewed the findings listed in his report and stated the main COncerrl should be intensity of use on the property. One additional service bay will in=ease the maintenance and repair portion of the business by 50 percent. The intensity will manifest itself by on-site circulation of vehicles and parking . Bergly explained the parking requirement is for 3 cars for each service bay, plus 1 for each employee on the major shift. ApproxiJnately 20 parking spaces are available for additional parking in the Great lake Restaurant parking lot adjacent to this site. Bergly also stated the actual need. for parking in this operation far exceeds ordinance requirements. Planner Bergly expressed concern that the applicant has not meet conditions of the previous SUP 86-27. The clunpster enclosure is not being used for the trash. It is =ently located west of the building, in a parking stall, and cars are frequently parked in front of it. Bergly advised that a propane dispensing facility was proposed in July, 1991, however, the application was never filed. 'Ihe soil remediation process on-site is ongoing and is located in the SW corner of the site. Previous owners had leakage problems from the underground tanks and were attempting to resolve the issue. A building to house the remediation . facilities was proposed, Case #91-20, and staffed recieved two requests to delay action on the item. Bergly advised he met with Architect Harry Shroeder, to discuss options for placement of the car wash and 3 options for the proposed expansion were discussed; Option A is the east end car wash, Option B is the south side car wash, and Option C is the west end placement. Advantages and disadvantages were briefly discussed f= each option. Bergly stated his opposition to Options B and C due to lack of landscaping, uncertainty of the placement of the remediation facilities, and uncertainty of the status of the proposed propane dispensing .station. The Planner also advised his COncerrl regarding wash water being directed to the sewer sytem; questioned if the water is being recycled or flushed i111mediately into the sanitary sewer system and noted the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) and Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) require a pennit to dispose water into the system. Chair Probst questiOned if Option B & C require any variances. Bergly advised Option C has a slight infringement on the 15-foot landscaped end of the and stated the parking scheme is the same the existing parking scheme and should be required to have more parking. Option B does not show parking on the west side that could be provided and is within 10 feet of the property line as a separate building. It is considered an accessory building and no variance is necessary. . . . Minutes of the Arden Hills RegUlar planning ocumi.ssion Meeting, 6-03-92 Page 3 ClISE #92-06 (cx:IiIT'Dl: Architect Harry Schroeder, stated Amoco is proposing only Option A, and would prefer Options B and C not be considered. Bergly advised the Commission should review all options before making a decision on this application. Member Erickson questioned if the scope of the original Special Use Permit was for a car wash. Bergly stated the original Special Use Permit was issued at the time of application for the car wash expansion; the b.1siness was "grand-fathered" in and is a use pennitted in the B-2 District by SUP. When the application for the car wash was reviewed, an SUP was granted which incorporated. the entire facility and all operations as part of the Special Use Permit, not just the car wash. Chair Probst asked if there are any questions or comments for Planner Bergly. 'Ihere was discussion regarding the access easements and parking agreement between the adjacent sites. . Member Petersen questioned if the existing parking is adequate for the restaurant with the use by Amoco. Bergly advised the parking is apparently adequate for the Great L3kes Restaurant patrons and is based on mnl1ber of parking stalls versus number of seats in the restaurant. Chair Probst asked if there were any questions or comments frOlll the floor. _Architect Harry Schroeder, discussed hCM Option A addressed the concerns of the Dentist office; parking, appearance, headlights, noise and traffic movements, during all hours. He stated Amoco oil Corrpany only supports Option A. Schroeder also stated an ErBineering Corrpany working on the remediation system and at this time the application has been delayed clue to l::R.Jdget constraints; indicated this matter may return in August. He explained that the remediation station would be a 10' by 12' structure tucked in the back of the Wilding. This structure would house pumps and testing equipment and is strictly a temporary Wilding . MI::. Schroeder continued to explain that the traffic congestion problem is due to high volumes of custamers needing repair work and the additiona service bay may help eliminate the congestion, move customers through the site faster, and reduce parking needs. He also stated they have Wilt 20 to 30 stations in the 'IWin . cities area and the requirement for recycling water has not been an issue. He stated that Amoco oil Corrpany would provide dOCLllllerltation, if necessary. --- Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Planning camnission Meeting, 6-03-92 . Page 4 CJ\SE #92-06 (<XNl"Dl: The Architect explained the car wash equipment does not cx:munence washing vehicles until they are conpletely within the car wash bay, which should eliminate any noise to adjaCent site. The only possible noise may be caused from the dryers when the cars exit the bay. The proposed driers are to eliminate residual dripping and excess water before vehicles enter the street. He stated he feels that Option A is the most conducive altenJative for the general public, the surrounding neighbors and the car wash site. Clair Probst asked if there were any questions. The Planner stated the owner of the Dentist Office, Dr. Anderson, prefers Option A because of the removal of parking and the more intensive landscaping that could be place along the property line. Ted Brauson, owner of the Amoco Station, supported Option A. Clair Probst asked if there was anyone present to speak in favor of or opposed to this project. Dr. Anderson, owner of the Dentist office, expressed concern that the water . dripping from existing vehicles may cause icy corrlitions at the easterly driveway/access to his property. He also requested sufficient landscaping on the east property line so that no headlights would shine into the office reception area. Clair Probst asked if there were any questions from the members. Member Carlson questioned the age of the underground tanks. Ted Brausen advised tanks are five years old and meet all pollution control -requirements. He also stated the proposed propane dispensing station was being pursued at the request of the Ramsey County Sheriff's Deparbnent, for use as a back-up system. He advised he has no interest in pursuing the dispensing station. Clair Probst stated there were 2 fundamental issues for Connnission to address: 1. Whether or not the additional intensity of use will be acceptable; and 2. Resolution of a number of open items in conjunction with the original SUP and proposed. future use of the site. Member Winiecki expressed concern regarding the SUP Amendment and stated her strong opposition to Option A, base don the intense use of the site. Clair Probst stated c:once:rns regarding the trash enclosures and des=ibed other sites that have =eated problems. . ---- . Minutes of the Arden Hills RegUlar Planning cnnni"'sion Meeting, 6-03-92 PageS CASE #92-06 (calI"D): Member Carlson state::! his =ncerns relating to the intensity of use of the station. He suggested Amoco oil Corrq:lany and the city meet to discuss the development of the lot. Chair Probst asked if there was anyone present to speak in favor of or opposed to this matter. Hearing no response, the public hearing was closed at 8:25 p.m. Petersen moved, seconded by piotrowski that Carmnission recommend to Council denial of Case #92-06i SUP Amendment with variance, 1306 W. Co. Road E, Amoco oil CcnIpany, as suhnitte::! with Option A, based on the fact there does not appear to be an identifiable hardship to warrant the variance request. Motion carried unanilrously. (6-0) PUBLIC HEARING: CASE #92-11: tll'=.ulL USE PERMIT. 1212 RED FOX ROAD. TWIN CITY PET SUPPLY CO.. ~.: Chair Probst opened the meeting at 8:25 p.m. for the purpose of a public hearing on Case #92-11, Special Use pennit to allow sale of pet supplies, club meetings, . pet seminars and dog training in the B-4 District, 1212 Red Fox Road, Twin city Pet SUpply Co., Inc. Acting Clerk Administrator Catherine Iago =nfll:med the publication of the Notice of Hearing in the New Briahton Bulletin on Wednesday, May 20, and mailing to affected property avners on Tuesday, May 19, 1992. Plarmer Bergly reviewed his report date::! June 3, 1992, relating to Special Use Pennit to allow dog training in the B-4 District, 1212 Red Fox Road, Twin city Pet SUpply Co., Inc. - Bergly explained that the Applicant has requeste::! a proposed use not liste::! as a pennitte::! use = use by Special Use Pennit in the list of District uses. He state::! the Zoning Ordinance (Section V, C) provides a means whereby the Carmnission and Council can determine whether it falls within a pennitte::! or Special Use category. The Carmnission reviewed this issue at the May 6 meeting and recommended it be treate::! as a Special Use requiring a Special Use Pennit. The Planner reviewed the background of the Applicant's request and state::! that parking is more than adequate and no site plan or exteri= building changes are proposed. He further state::! this would qualify as a transitional use even if the uses were not pennitted in the new B-4 District but pennitte::! in the previous 1-2 District. Bergly reviewed the findings liste::! in his report and state::! that this issue is . a use where no single use is predominant and no single use is clearly accessory. He state::! the training area is the only segment of the use that would not be =nsidered a pennitte::! use in the B-4 District. Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Planning CCmnission Meeting, 6-03-92 . Page 6 Cl\SE #92-11 (CCIIT'D): The Planner explained most animal related uses require Special Use Permits when animals are kept overnight = longer. In this use, the training portion requires the dog owner to participate for one or two hours at a time. 'Ihere will be no evidence that the use involves animals. Existing parking lot acconunodates 60 cars and approximately 30 cars will be will be on site during training. 'Ihe Planner stated the applicants feel the majority of clients will purchase retail products. Training classes are in the evening and will induce traffic on Red Fox and Lexington over a longer period of time. Bergly explained that a similar facility is lccated in Burnsville and is allowed as a permitted use. Planner Bergly concluded to recommend the first action should be to detennine if this type of use should be considered an allowable use with a Special Use Permit in the B-4 District. 'Ihe se=nd action would be to approve or deny the applicants I request. Bergly recommended a condition be attached to the permit to allow the city to review the operation after one year. 'Ihis would allow discussion after the use if operating at nearly full capacity. Bergly stated the Fire Marshall has slight m:rlifications to the hlilding that he would like to recommend. Bergly recommended approval subject to the Fire . Marshall's review. Chair Proffit advised the City Attomey requested infonnation regarding evidence of title before the SUP is filed. He asked if there were any questions. Acting Clerk Administrator Catherine rago questioned if the city should require a copy of the lease agreement i Delta Envirornnental and Zeos were required to suJ:mi.t copies of leases as conditions of approval of applications in the Lexington-Fox Business area. Bergly agreed this may be :ilnposed as a condition of approval of this application. - Letty Afong, Owner, stated her hlsiness would add to the Community by assisting responsible dog owners professional training for their pets. She also stated classes would be held frOOl 6:30 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. Members Carlson and Erickson questioned the issues of noise and animal droppings. Ms. Afong advised she had not discussed the noise issue with her neighbors and the parking lot would be cleaned once or twice per day to alleviate any dog droppings frOOl the parking lot. Member Petersen questioned if 'lWin City Pet SUpply would be selling animals. Member winiecki expressed concern that no signage proposal was received. . . Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Planning Calmi.ssion Meeting, 6-03-92 Page 7 ~E #92-11 (oaNT'D): Ms. Afong informed her hlsiness caters to vetranarians and kennels and she sells only foexi and supplies. She stated she also holds educational seminars and club meetings; with the possibility of adding. 'Ihe signage has not been determined at this time, however, she stated it will conform to sign regulations. Chair Probst asked if there was anyone present to speak in favor of or opposed to this matter. Eugene and Darlene Frobragd, OWner, stated his support of the Special Use Permit. Chair Probst. ask if there were any other questions or conunents. Hearing no resp:mse, the public hearing was closed at 8:37 p.m. Member winiecki advised there is an abandoned flag at the site and unless it is lighted, it should be removed. winiecki moved, seconded by Carlson, that Commission recannnend to Council approval of Case #92-11; Special Use Permit, 1212 Red Fox Road, 'IWin City Pet Supply Co., Inc. in a B-4 District with the following conditions: . 1. 'Ihe city be allowed to review the operation in one year. 2. 'Ihe applicant provide a copy of the lease and evidence of title. 3. 'Ihe applicant COllqJly with any stipultions of the Fire Marshall. Motion carried unanimously. (6-0) ~E #92-07 - ~, 1355 CUMMINGS lANE, RANALID: Planner Bergly reviewed his report dated 6-03-92, relating to the variance j::"equest to allow a 10 foot solid wall, 1355 CUmmings Lane, Frank and Mary Beth Ranallo. Bergly explained since the construction of the Ranallo home in the mid-1980's which faces North HaInline Avenue, traffic noise, speed, and miscellaneous debris have excessively in=eased. He advised the applicant is requesting to construct a 10 foot high solid westel:n red fence sound barrier between the highway ID'J and the frontage road drive. Bergly stated the Zoning Ordinance prohibits fences = solid walls higher than 10 feet in the front yard and requires fences be at least 30 percent open for passage of air and light. 'Ihe Planner reviewed the findings listed in his report and noted the fence provisions in the Ordinance were established to allow fences f= enclosures (or separations) and visual screenin. He indicated =iteria for enclosing and screening is somewhat different than =iteria for reducing sound. Bergly also . stated the applicant installed a dense evergreen screen (now 8 I to 10' high) in the area where the ferice is proposed and until the evergreens mature, the height and density are not adequate for an effective sound barrier. Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Planning ccmnission Meeting, 6-03-92 Pages . Cl\SE #92-11 Cc:rtIT'D): Bergly indicated he visited the site during non-peak traffic hours and the noise was una=eptable and the applicant states the noise is worsening. The Planner also indicated that the fence would not =eate a hardship for neighboring property and would not be obtrusive on the highway. The Planner concluded with the following items: 1. Variances fram literal provisions of the Ordinance are allowed where strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the property. In this case, the literal fence provisions were not intended to apply to sound barriers. 2. Although this noise problem is not unique to this lot, it is unique to . lots along highway frontage roads. 3. The hardship is real to the occupants and visitors to the site and the noise impact is not present on most properties in the city. 4. The owners have attempted to deal with the problem through a natural barrier. This variance is fram Section VI, E, (7) , (c) of the Zoning Ordinance to allow a 10-foot solid wall instead of the permitted 3 foot wall in a front yard. Commission discussed the following relating to the proposed fence: . 1. No infonnation provided relating to sound decibels levels. 2. No infonnation relating to established noise =iteria which wa=ants fencing along the highway. 3. Sound abatement treabnent. 4. Placement of fences by residents on state-owned highways. Frank Ranallo, Owner , was agreeable to attempting to gather and suhnit the infonnation discussed. - Member Petersen advised he favored denying the applicant, based on the lack of identifiable hardship. Chair Probst opposed recommending denial of the request; stated the Commission does not have enough infonnation to make a recommendation. He suggested the Applicant to obtain infonnation on established =iteria f= placement of a sound wall fram MnIXlT. Member Winiecki stated the Commission needs decibel figures and expert advice if a 10-foot fence would el:intinate their noise problem. Petersen moved, seconderl by Edckson that Commisson recommend to Council denial of Case #92-07, Variance to allow a 10 foot solid wall based on no identifiable hardship. Motion carrierl. (Carlson, Erickson, Petersen, . Piotrowski, winiecki voting in favor; Probst opposed). (5-1) Minutes of the Arden Hills Re;JUlar Planning Ocmni.ssion Meeting, 6-03-92 . Page 9 Cl\SE #92-11 (<:x:2iIT'D): It was suggested that Ranallo provide the information prior to Council action on this matter or a re:{Uest that action on the matter be delayed until receipt of the information relating to the fence. Acting Clerk Administrator Catherine Iago suggested Mr. Ranallo =ntact Mary Bierenger at MnlXJI' obtain sound wall and decibel information as a guideline. Member Barbara piotrowski left the meeting at 9:05 p.m. Cl\SE #92-08; V1lRIANCE. 1717 PARKSHl:IlE IIUVE #1112. DLUGC6CH: Planner Bergly review his report dated 6-03-92, relating to the variance re:{Uest to allow a 6 f(Xlt fenced wall in a residential side yard (2 1/2 foot variance for solid wall or a variance from the 30 percent open re:{Uirement), 1717 Parkshore Drive #1112, James Dlugosch. Bergly explained the applicant proposes a variance to allow a 6 f(Xlt solid wall along a side property line. 'Ihe fence would be setl:ack 40 feet from the street and will extend south 64 feet; the top of the wall will be 107 feet and the ground at the base will be 101 feet. TIle very south end of the wall will be . approxilnately 11 feet high. 'Ihe Planner reviewed the findings listed in his report and stated a city trail is located immediately east of the applicants property. TIle proposed JX10l in the rear yard of the proposed house would be exposed to trail users without a solid fence. Bergly stated the applicant feels that privacy from the trail is :i1nportant and neither a 42" wall or a 30 percent open fence allowed up to 6 feet high would provide the desired privacy. 'Ihe applicant also feels the trail is an amenity but would like privacy, too. ]3ergly indicated the land use east of the trail is higher density residential and a buffer between single family and higher densities is considered appropriate. 'Ihe usable site area on the lot is limited due to the sloping rear yard and full utilization of the upper portion is proposed. 'Ihe Planner also indicated the nearest tcMnhornes are approximately 150 feet east of the trail easement and will not be iIrpacted by the solid fence. Neither air circulation or light as specified in the Ordinance provision re:{Uiring 30 percent opermess in a fence are issues due to proximity. Planner Bergly explained the trail easement is 35 feet wide and will provide ample space for air circulation and the 64 foot long wall does not iIrpact a portion of the trail. TIle wetland on the south end of the lot will not be affected by the wall. 'Ihe Planner =ncluded to recommend approval of the variance and stated 3 reasons . why it is appropriate: Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Planning O:mni.ssion Meeting, 6-03-92 Page 10 . CME #92-08: 1. 'Ihe views from the City trail is the factor the applicant is seeking to :minimize am directly inpact this property. 2. '!he provisions in the Ordinance regarding both height am openness of fences do not allow an effective screen for allowing privacy in the pool and terrace area. 3. '!he elevations of the lot do not allow flexibility of placing the pool or terrace so they would not be inpacted by trail users . Member Winiecki expressed her concern of placing a wall near a park trail would promote violence am would take away from the openness of the trail system. Mr. Dlugosch stated three reasons why he needs the wall: privacy, safety and security, and architectural consistency. '!here was discussion regarding further proposed landscaping, placement of the pool in another area on his lot, fencing around the pool, am if his fence would provide 30 percent requirement for air and lighting. Peterson moved, seconded by winiecki that Colmnission recornmend to Council denial of Case #92-08, Variance to allow a 6 foot fenced wall in a residential side yard. Motion carried unanilrously. (5-0) . CME #92-10: SIDE YARD VARI1\H:!E, 3465 SInm CXXJRT, DtlNN (SHalE emlER): Plarmer Bergly reviewed his report dated 6-03-92, relating to a side yard variance of 3 feet for an attached garage, 3465 siems Court, Donald Shore. Bergly stated the applicant proposed a variance to allow a single car garage to be expanded to a two car garage that will require a 3-foot side yard variance on the north side of the house. '!he existing garage is 15 feet 2 inches from the lot line am with the proposed extension of 8 feet 2 inches, the renaining side -yard would be 7 feet. A 10 foot side yard is required. No elevation drawings or floor plans at this time. '!he Planner reviewed the findings and noted the following: 1. '!he neighborhood was developed prior to present zoning standards and most homes on this segment of siems Court do not conform to present standards. The placement of the home in the center of the lot does not allow a two- car garage without a variance. 2. '!he present one car garage does not meet contemporary development needs where two am three car garages are now the standard. anI y this house and the one directly a=oss the street now have single car garages along this segment of siems Court. 3. The garage on the lot directly north of am adjacent this parcel is 6.5 feet from the lot line from which the proposed variance is requested. '!his home and the Donald Shore hc:>IDe have approxliuatel y the same front yard set back. This neighboring garage was constructed in 1956, two years . after the home was built. , Minutes of the :Arden Hills RegUlar Planning carmission Meeting, 6-03-92 . Page 11 ClISE #92-10 (CXlNT'Dl: 4. 'lhe neighboring garage and the proposed garage will be separated by 13.5 feet between them. This is the best relationship if reduced side yards are necessary as both properties will have similar irIpacts on each other. No site views will be affected. 5. The neighbor has experienced minor erosion ta.-mrd the rear of her garage along the property line. The problem would be lessened by reversing the flow in the gutter and downspout on the Donald' Shore property. It now drains on the front co:rner of the garage. 6. 'lhe roof line on the Shore home does not lerrl itself to a sbnple extension of the :main gable. The concern is that if the variance is allowed, the additional should be compatible with the architecture of the existing home. Bergly concluded by stating the ordinance allows variances where ".. . site facto~ prohibit reasonable develqnne.nt equivalent to that which would be pennitted without variance on a similar size lot located in the same district, wt which lot has not unusual COnfiguration. II In the case presented, the unusual factor is not the size of the lot related to other nearby lots, wt is the placement of the existing house on the lot. "El::{uivalent" use relates to the fact that only this and one other lot on this cul-de-sac have only single car garages . with no metho:i of =eating one without a variance or by razing the existing house and constructing a new one that meets today's regulations. The Planner reconunended his approval of the variance with the following stipulations: 1. The applicant satisfactorily addresses the drainage issue discussed in Finding #4 above, and 2. The applicant bring the wilding plans and elevations back to the Planning Commission for review and approval. -Mr. Bergly also recorrnnended attaching a stipulation that the new property a.mer be re::tillred to subnit wilding plans f= Commission review and approval. 'lhere was discussion of concerns relating to granting a variance to the ~l;~) of the property with no blilding plans subnitted. .- Erickson moved, seconded by Carlson, that Commission reconunend to Council approval of Case #92-10, Side yard variance of 3 feet f= an attached garage, with the conditions that the blilding plans for the addition to the garage be reviewed and approved by Planning Commission. Motion =ied unani1nously. (5-0) Cl\SE #92-09: SITE PIAN REVTI.W. 4155 ~ AVE. N.. FOSTER: Chair Probst explained the Commission has been in the process of reviewing and . revising the Zoning Code Ordinance and suggested the Commission table action on this item until such t:iJne as the review is completed. - Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Planning camrl.ssion Meeting, 6-03-92 Page 12 . ClISE #92-09 (CXlNr'Dl: Carlson moved, seconded by winiecki, to recommend that action on Case #92-09, Site Plan Review, What-a-RaCXJUet Sports courts, Dennis Foster, be tabled l.Ultil the ZOning Ordinance has been adopterl by the city council. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) Mr. Foster reviewed. the history of his attempt to secure a site Plan Review and felt it is unfair the Cormnission table his item since he has CClIlplied with all the regulations and requests. He further stated he would be willing to review the proposed ordinance regulations and attempt to CClIlply with the new regulations. Planner Bergly suggested Cannnission recommend that Council =nsider imposing a- moratorium on development l.Ultil the review of the ZOning Ordinance has been CClIlpleted and adopted, with exclusions for pennits on existing buildings or items that CClIlply with the recommended changes to the code. Carlson moved, seconded by Winiecki, to recommend that Council =sider imposing a development moratorium, and request the City Attorney prepare the appropriate documentation. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) DISCUSSICfi: arHER PI.l\NNIm ISSUES: COmmission =n=ed to begin the July 1 Plarming Meeting at 6:30 p.m. to . accornroodate discussion of the Draft ZOning Ordinance amendments prior to regular lxJsiness items. COUN:)lL REPORT: Council Liaison Mahowald report on items of interest to the Cormnission. ADJOURN: Carlson moved, seconded by Winiecki, that the meeting be adjourned at 10:40 p.m. Chair Dennis Probst . BRAUSEN ENTERPRISES, INC. TED BRAUSEN CHERYL BRAUSEN 2170 N. DALE ST. · ROSEVILLE, MN 55113 · 612-487-2502 . JUNE 3, 1992 City Council of Arden Hills 1450, West Highway 96 Arden Hills, Mn 55112 To Whom it May Concern, At this time I would like to request the council to de~er action on case number 92-06, the amended special use permit ~or Arden Hills Amoco, 1306 w. Co. Rd. E, Arden Hills, Mn. I would greatly appreciate i~ this could be de~erred to the July 13th regular council meeting,. as I am meeting with city sta~~ to discuss other options ~or this expansion. I would also like to request that the planning commission reconsider the application at the July 1st meeting. . Sincerely, :ti Brausen ~~>- cc: Mayor o~ Arden Hills - TSB/bam . RECEIVED JUN 0 5 1992 " ~ . , CITY OF 1\RDEN HILLS . MEKIU\NOOM Dlcr'E : June 4, 1992 ro: Mayor and city council ~:@ Tarry Post, TEIllpOrary City 1\cooUntant ~: May 1992 Financial Results Enclosed are financial infonnation schedules for the m:mth ended May 31, 1992. In addition to these schedules, two IrOre (Management overvi<M/ Commentary and statement of Cash Receipts, Expenditures, and Balances) will be made available to you prior to the 6/8/92 Council meeting. Please bear with me as I att.errpt to standardize a financial reporting package that will be timely, infonnative, and useful for Council purposes . This IrOnth I s reporting package =nsists of the following: 1- Management overvi<M /Commentary . 2. Financial SUmmary (All Fl.1rrls) 3. General Fund (101) Budget SUmmary 4. Budget SUmmary (All Fl.1rrls) 5. Invesbnent Portfolio Analysis 6. statement of Cash Receipts, Expenditures, and Balances. I will be in attendance at the June 8, 1992 council meeting and will respond to any questions you may have on the above materials. TP:rk - . ----------- ------ CITY OF ARDEN HILLS 2- FINANCIAL SUMMARY (ALL FUNDS) MAY 1992 . >1992 a,UDPCT INP(Pt;C) XEAR-'Tl;?DA TE 1992ANN ,'qVER ACTUAl/'PREV YR sunGEi' 19911<0T REVENUE -101 TAXES 34,933 27,454 37,891 27,454 1.38 1,432,582 5.4% LICENSES & PERMITS 13,808 10,092 59,536 50,250 18.5% 123,331 -23.4% INTERGOVERNMENTAL 1 0,444 11,899 12,829 32,862 -61.0% 118,170 -26.7% CHARGES & FINES 4,737 7,488 7,207 17,087 -57.8% 69,000 26.4% OTHER 790 1,432 2,225 9,735 -77.1% 112,605 53.9% OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 117 0 234 117 100.0% 0 -100.0% ilil;11ml!;I!I!!lml!6gyg!l!~g~!ll::!1!i! !lmj~?~! !!lm~i~,$~ !!111li~??III!II~~7i@g~!I@lgj~Mi1j~I~~~;I!; !ltlj~M REVENUE ALL FUNDS 101 64,829 58,365 119,922 137,505 -12.8% 1,855,688 -1.8% PARKS (224, 226, 227) 14,333 35,220 71,531 91,938 -22.2% 201,064 -11.0% SERVICES (225, 228) 5,489 1,948 24,435 28,312 -13.7% 119,100 0.4% CAPITAL PROJECTS 46,658 18,896 85,818 78,460 9.4% 809,281 -28.5% WATER (601) 124,033 1,407 261,953 140,937 85.9% 638,555 5.8% SEWER (602) 66,055 177,620 242,493 387,184 -37.4% 629,950 -3.6% .YCLlNG (603) 18,920 0 18,920 0 0.0% 78,354 100.0% !;;'!J!lmll:[@jf,^gifflgyg!l!9g~'!I!!I!!~91~1%; ;!lg~I~@$ !!I~g~ig7?1!!I~i~~@! :!jf;~l!I~~?11 EXPENDITU RE - 101: GENERAL GOVERNMENT 33,045 42,955 203,424 228,360 -10.9% 491,771 -9.1% POLICE 78,726 57,558 208,542 179,805 16.0% 478,507 5.9% FIRE 0 506 88,818 110,506 -19.6% 291,650 -1.2% PUBLIC WORKS 13,320 15,203 55,497 91,255 -39.2% 333,296 -16.5% PARKS & RECREATION 13,771 14,409 68,420 64,704 5.7% 229,217 1.8% OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 0 0 0 474 -100.0% 0 -100.0% !1;!1;II!;l1g1il_~tl!!.t!j!l~mg~I!!:!;!I!I!I.~~;~@?liil;'~;!;~$.lil;l;i~gij%Q1!::ilim;~ilW4!:liHB~;~lli!'j~gi;~1111!11'!IB@j~1 EXPENDITURES - ALL FUNDS: 101 138,862 130,631 624,703 675,104 -7.5% 1,824,441 -6.3% PARKS (224, 226, 227) 15,356 16,506 39,266 41,504 -5.4% 194,774 -14.9% SERVICES (225, 228) 10,665 387 12,084 12,729 -5.1% 103,850 4.5% CAPITAL PROJECTS 24,923 34,539 22,596 44,973 -49.8% 701,091 9.6% WATER (601) 29,187 88,903 202,133 230,768 -12.4% 748,690 12.6% SEWER (602) 63,576 53,047 353,223 304,212 16.1% 870,528 10.5% RECYCLING (603) 10,691 0 19,755 0 0.0% 77,656 100.0% .m{;!imWI~~Ii!~rnWmg~:!lilil:i~Il!6011!::I~:!j(!lliialll!1;m~;"!l1lIili\1I;~~j~llgl!1il'I@?iiiVJilij5:!1f)Il~~II;i!iii21~S4 NET SURPLUS (DEFICIENCY) 47,056 (30,557) (448,688) (444,949) 0.8% (189,038) Updated 6-05-92 j,. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS GENERAL FUND (101) BUDGET SUMMARY MAY 1992 tIl REVENUE - -------------------------------------------------------------- --------- SOURCE BUDGET CURRENT MONTH YR TO DATE BALANCE % TO DATE ---------------- ------------- ------------- ---------- ---------- --------- TAXES 1,432,582 34,933 37,891 1,394,691 3% LICENSES 123,331 13,808 59,536 63,795 48% INTERGOV. REV 118,170 10,444 12,829 105,341 11% CHGS FOR SERVo 38,700 1,980 7,548 31,152 20% FINES & FORF. 26,000 2,757 ( 341) 26,341 -1% MISC. REC. 56,030 790 2,225 53,805 4% INTEREST 4,300 0 0 4,300 0% INTERAL REVENUE 25,146 0 0 25,146 0% TRANSFERS 3,1,429 117 234 31,195 1% ------------- ------------- ---------- ---------- --------- TOTAL REVENUE 1,855,688 64,829 119,922 1,735,766 6% ----------------------------------------------------------- EXPENDITURES ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT BUDGET CURRENT MONTH YR TO DATE BALANCE % TO DATE* ---------------- ------------- ------------- ---------- ---------- --------- MAYOR & COUNCIL 42,873 2,201 21,658 21,215 51% MUNICIPAL 36,200 2,949 11,290 24,910 31% E.'TIONS 11,215 265 4,199 7,016 37% ADMIN OFFICE 252,472 15,938 125,724 126,748 50% LEGAL 20,350 1,465 6,598 13,752 32% PLAN & ZONING 30,935 3,388 13,543 17,392 44% GOVT. BLDGS 48,704 3,630 14,469 34,235 30% HUMAN RGTS. 200 0 50 150 25% PROTo INSPECT. -48,822 3,209 5,893 42,929 12% POLICE PROT. I 478,507 I 78,726 I 208,543 I 269,964 I 44% FIRE PROTo 291,650 0 88,818 202,832 30% PW STREETS 315,064 12,610 40,323 274,741 13% PW STORM SEWERS 18,232 5,709 15,161 3,071 83% PW RECYCLING 0 (4,999) 13 ' (13) SUMMER PLAYGRND 12,768 0 267 12,501 2% SKATING RINKS 42,627 1,789 19,745 22,882 46% PARK MTNCE. 173,822 11,982 48,408 125,414 28% TRANSFER TO 226 0 0 0 0 TRANSFER TO 408 0 0 0 0 ------------- ------------- ---------- ---------- --------- TilL EXP. 1,824,441 138,862 624,703 1,199,738 34% ----------------------------------------------------------- REVENUE LESS $31,247 ($74,033) ($504,781) $536,028 EXPENDITURES -----~------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- * IF EXPENDITURES OCCURED EVENLY THROUGHOUT THE YEAR, THE MAY YTD WOULD BE 42% ~ 7=-7~-~~~-~~-~~~-~~~-~~-~-~-~1~ I c;l">l-lt"'J [;h1"Clo..o Ol..l" 000 0000'>0 CO...o OIl- 1_~1~ ~O~ ~ . ~ - I~ I~~I ~_ ~ - I ffi:~~1 r ~IQ~l I ~ ~~I I ~~~-~-------------------------~- C , I ' z ~ ~~r- O~ ~~O 000 W~ CO ru 010 W IC- "'OC\J..... (U ll'c:. M~ ..0 -. 1m . C:..,...... I....... Cl'1.q..... r- c;oru .o.r- r- C\.I I~'i..l >< C]">QI... ___ .......... ...... I.... Wlcr'~I~ ~Nr- N ~ru ~ 0 q I~ 1_>11- M ...... ru _ M 0 10 I I L.Q l"\.l M r 1"""1 , I I ... I I I ..... ------------------------------- 7--,~-~~y-;~-~~~-~---~~-~-~-~I~ I ~I~ ...o~..o ~~ ~OO Of 1 ..o~ ~ ..... ~IC:O i- I r....J ~ (\J...o I 1 (\J -cr (U f CIJ t .;lJ a I I I I I g:: Q I I 1 I -0: I I i- I I , , , : --.,t. I I --7-------------------------7- ,~ ,= ~~~ 8= =~= 800 ~c ~ ~ _10 Lzu.lr7J C--I::;(.I .:[) "J-4'-' Mt- l.,,-J 00 r- :2~1r-:~-ct"..1.('l_ ...t--_OC1'oC\.l 4"... 0"t_.(1l_Lr"l...r;.CT>...1~. ._crll7> ......JI.DI.(1 <.Din '7U(TIo.D 0 C\J<"o r.,O r- r-It- :~~l~ ....~~ ~ ~~ru...... ~ ~ ~ ~l~ I iJJ ~] ... I ... U" I a:. I..... I ""'J W ______________________________ a.. I I I ~: 18 ['..:gocr o~ ooOoooo::gg ~ M ~I$ _,~ I~ ~ocr~ 0 .- - ~ ~I~ OIr:;r.Q .._ __.._ ... .... .............. ZI~~I~ ~MM ~ ru ~ M ~ M ~:""'~l~ M"'" ru ~ ~ ~I~ _ 1 1 I .... ~ 1 I ..... --7-------------------------7- 1M ~~~ O~ 000 000 MO ~ ~ I~ !z:x:I~ $rn~ ~ ~~ ~ rn ::Bl~ w~ I.... ........ .... .... ............ I .... Q:. 1<::0 ~'U(\.1 C. .. ~ M OlM ~ l~ ........ ~'U 0.,0 .....1K: t..;. I 1 , , --.-------------------------7- ~l~ ~~* 2g ~~~ goOo 88 ~ ~ ~J~ I~ ~<::o<::o ~~ o~ru ~ ~_ 0.,0 ~ ~IO c~l.'" ~ I.; ...oarq)' L.5r-: ,-v.,;..D' 0" Lt'i'r-: ar .0 ,.: I' ;:; ""'~I~ ......._li"J <<:0_ OOO:>('OJ - ffl .q- r- I'-- tn U' ~ I.... - ...... (~.o::o l.... ..J I..... I ~ ..J~ ------------------------------- :is z ------------------------------- . L.L.J~ I l~ 'I<<.';r(.~ ~~ ~'I<<.~ ~.....~~"l'l""" ~ ~I"" ~~~ I ~l~ M~ ~..... or-_ o~o 0.,00 _ .0::0 .. ~ Q;. <:I: cr- I....... I .(f> C\.J I I ..... ..... .q- M C\J I ..... c:~""' 1('1,.12;1 I 1 ..... 10"'1-<1 I lJ.. 10'" I 1 C~> 1_01 I >-~:i : 1-1 1 I- L..r..l l")-f. I I c~ 7--7-------------------------7- = l(!l I<.D .::ocor- ruM COLrJM ~c:.a) r-..- C\.J r-- -4""10 = 12L..r..l1~ ~~_ -n ~~~ ~N __ 0 ~ Ml~ I_UII'-- ~~.(f> MM I'--~M ~_ _(\.1 ~ -<t" ~I~ 1~!I~ ~ar~ ~M N~~ o~ ~~ ~ ~ ~1~ ~i~lr- ~ l ~M ~_('OJ"'" ~~ M ~ ~1~ 1 l.JJ a:r I .... I .... I~_~=__----------------------~~ I I _ _ ~_ 1 , ,~~-~ ~M $~f(l c~~ ~~ M M ~I~ ~;g::Q!rn... ~~...O".... ~~ -"'...::: t;~ ~= ~~... ~....IS_ u.;.1Q"'l-ltYl 0.0 -4'" - -<t"..... ~ Q';lj!(! Gil->-I:: If"l(\.j (\J - r-::<:: (\.l -I.as - Cl. I [ 1 j--7-------~-----------------I- , 1CT"l ("l--,MQ';l..q-Lfl o~o 000 o.DO M It:I *'~ + ~ I C1..l 00 Co 0:\.1 r- _ 0-> '1M I.('J I ...... :a:;j:'E[[X) -r---...IrJ_ """_ ~ 0: 0.... 0... ...IM... 1a::~I'<r OM I.t'J r., ~.- ...0 0::010 ;~~I~ _ ocr ru ~ _I.- :a I ~ 1M I , I j--7-------------------------7- , '~~~8 08 =M= 880 ~9 ~ ~ ~,~ :~~l~ ~[X)~ 8_ *~~ ~o::o o~ ~ ~ ~I~ l~~l~ ~~M ~M ru~~ o~ ~~ Cl- (g- ~[- 1-=:1 I l.!'-) _r- COM cor-Cl,J""""""o:\.I r-IM I .a:r I 0::0 _ _ -.It" M I I... .... I 1_ ...,. ---7----------~~m--~----------7- I Q.:x'J(J) I I , _ - !l! :;: , I It t-.~ ~.. I , % ~w ~i- ~Q , I .0 ~l.i..lt- .....J _ 4:; I I ~~ o~~ ~ ~ ~ [ IQ ~ ~_ ~~~ ~ _ , l~ ~~Q ~~ ~~: ~~~ ~~ ~i J~ t-~~ _t- ~o 5t-~ -~ -I . '''' ~'" iw a' . .~>- ..... '" '" d ,-' ! ~_ ~ ~ a:i d s: ~ 8 0: ~:> ~ ~ i:i 1 S ,~ ~~ 5 ~cl~ i~5 ~~ ~ ~ ~I>- 1--------------------------- I , 1_ ~~r- Sj~ If"l~O co~c -ru ...... * M' 10 ~~~ ~ o~~ 00_ oru 00 001 1_ ruru(\.1 N MMM ~-<t"~ If"l~ W WI - L. ~ CITY OF ARDEN HILLS INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO 05/311g2 a~E PURCHASE MATURITY TERM TYPE INVESTMENT INVESTMENT CATEGORY COST ANNUAllZEO YIELD MARKET VALUE DATE DATE (DAYS) GOAL TOTAl. ~ . IF APPLICABLE PV FO 05/31192 06/01/92 I MM PRIME VALUE MONEY MARKET $313,4Ba.19 3. 71~ '11,630.41 4M FO 05/31/92 06/01/92 1 MM 4M MONEY MARKET '201,940.76 3. 71~ '7,492.00 SHEARSON 05/31192 06/01192 1 MM SHEARSON LEHMAN MONEY MKT 0110,197.82 3.67~ t4, 044. 26 PIPER 05/01/92 05/31/92 30 MM PIPER JAFFRAY MONEY MARKET 01,018.74 3.25~ >33.11 SUB-TOTAL MONEY MARKET 15~ 15'" 0626,645.51 3.7~ '23,199.78 4M FUND 12/23/91 06/22/92 182 CD HOllE S\I6S OF AilERICAlCA $100,000.00 4.aO~ $4, aoo. 00 4 M FUND 08/07190 Oaf06f92 2 YR CD Standard Pacific Savings, F.A. $100,000.00 8.2~ $8,250.00 4 M FUND 08f07 f90 08/06/92 2 YR CO First Federal Savings Bank $100, (~!O. 00 8.10~ .8,100.00 4 H FUND 08/28/90 08/27/92 2 YR CD great Wester~ Bank 0100,000.00 a.lo~ oa, 1(~l.C~1 4 M FUND 11/14f91 ll/13/92 I YR CD COLONIAl NAT'L BK/DE '100,000.00 5.6~,': 4i5~650.00 SHEARSON 12flO/90 12/10/92 2 YR CD Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. $'30,000.00 7.9S~ $7,155.00 4M FUND 12f23/91 12/22f92 I YR CD PACIFIC BAnK/CA $100,000.00 5.00~ 05,000.00 qM FUND 12/23/91 06/23/93 1.5YR CD YORK FEDl S & L/PA '100,000.00 5.15~ ~5, 150,(1\) #I FUND 12f23/91 06/23/93 1.5YR CD UNION FEDl SVGS BAnKIIN $100,000.00 5.15~ $5,150.00 qM FUND 12/23/91 06/23/93 1.5YR CD 1ST DEPOSIT NATL BKfNH $100,000.00 5.00~ $5,000.00 4 M FUND (18/08/91 08/09/93 2 YR CD Sacra.ento S & L $100,000.00 7.1M >7,100.00 SHEARSON 09/10/90 09/10/93 3 YR CD AMer. Security N.A. 090,000.00 a.45~ $7,605.00 SHEARSON 09110/90 09/10/93 3 YR CD MBNA America Bank N.A. $90,000.00 8.45~ 1:.7,605.00 SHEARSOU 10/22/90 10/22/93 3 YR CD Maryland Nat'! Bank $90,000.00 8.45~ $7,605.00 =- 11 113/9(l 11/13/93 3 YR CD Bank of New York $90,000.00 a.oo~ $7,200.00 11/13/90 tlf13/93 3 YR CD Bank of New York/Delaware $90,000.00 B.OO~ $7,200.00 4 M fUND Il/H/91 11/15/93 2 YR CD COLUMBIA S & L/CO $100,000. (10 6.1(I~ .6,100.00 SHEARSON 12/03/90 11/26/93 3 YR CD Boston Safe Dep. & Trust '90,000.00 8.0~ '7,200.00 SHEARSON 12/24/90 12/24/93 3 YR CD FCC National Ban" $90,000,00 7.70~ $6,930.(>0 4 M FUND '10/1l/91 10/10f94 3 YR CD HOUSEHOLD BANK OF CAL. $100,0(1(1.00 6.45~ $6,450.00 4M fUND 12/23/91 12/23/94 3 YR CD HEART FEDL S & L/eA $100,000.00 6.15% $6,150.00 #I FUND t2/23/91 12/26/95 4 YR CD HAWTHORNE S & L/CA $100,000.00 6.35~ i6,3S0.00 #I FUND 12/23/91 12/26/95 4 YR CD 1ST COMMONWEAlTH 8KfV~ $1(10,000.00 6.25~ $6,250.00 SHEARSON O9f03/91 O9f03/96 5 YR CD Cor~inental Bank, NA 90,000.00 7.30~ %,570.00 4 M FUND 12/11/91 12/10/96 5 YR CD FIRST USA BANK/DELAWARE '100,000.00 6. 7M st., ]00.-00 SUB-TOTAL FIXED RATE INSTRUMENT 50~ 57% ~2,4iOJOOO.OO 6.B6i $165,370.00 PIPER 05/01/92 05f31192 30 MU PIPER JAFFRAY INSTIT GDVT 15" I3~ $534,146.51 10.22% $54,572.5] PIPER 01/10/92 11/15/95 4 YR AS US T-STRIPS 0199,305.05 5.45~ '10,862.13 SHEARSON 08/15/91 04/15/96 5 YR AS ZERO COUPON $142, IB8. 00 7.45" $10,587.32 PIPER 01/10/92 05/15/96 4.5YR AS US T-STRIPS $99,797.76 5.82% $5,808.23 SHEARSON 08/15/91 07/15/96 5 YR AS ZERO COUPON '139,192.00 7.51~ $10,454.71 SHEARSON 03/27/92 04/t5f97 5 YR AS ZERO COUPON 052,876.02 7.oq~ '3,722.47 SUB-TOTAL ZEROS 2(J~ 15% $633, 358. 63 6.54~ $4!,434.66 TOTAL INVESTMENTS 100~ I()(r,( .4,204,150.85 $2B4, 577. 15 . OVERIl.l. ANNUALIZED RATE OF RETURN 6. 77~ ANNUAL I ZED RATE OF RETURN W/O MONEY MARKET 7.31i / .... . CITY OF 1\RDEN HILLS MEM:IU\NDUM DATE: J\me 4, 1992 TO: Mayor and City COtDlCil FRCH: Dan Winkel, Public WOrks SUperintendent diU ~: Medical Leave of Absence for Fred Reed I have conferred with Mr. Reed all options available regarding his status with Arden Hills. Fred is aware of the Council's decision not to extend any additional sick or vacation time. Fred is very appreciative of all the time Council granted hm. With this in mind, Fred is requesting a 90 day medical leave of absence without pay. I explained to hm at this time, this would probably be his only option. REO::M1ENDATION: . Staff recormnends to Council to grant his request of a medical leave of absence for 90 days commencing June 13, 1992 until September 10, 1992. ACl'ION RFDlJTRED: If Council con=s with staff recommendation, they should grant Mr. Reed a 90 day medical leave of absence camrnencing June 13, 1992 to September 10, 1992, as requested. I:M:rk - . , , . June 4, 1992 Mayor arrl City Council Members: I would like to take this opportunity to thank the Council for all -of your help arrl understanding while I have been injured arrl away from my job. I My prcgress has been much slower than I had anticipated, arrl at times, can be very frustrating. I am still hoping arrl planning to come back to work as soon as possible. However, at this t:iJ:ne, I understand that my sick t:iJ:ne arrl most of my vacation t:iJ:ne has been used up by my absence, arrl I am requesting a 90-day medical leave of absence without pay. Both myself arrl my physician are hopeful that by then I will be able to return to work. Once again, both myself arrl my family appreciate the extended t:iJ:ne that the Council has granted to me, and I am very hopeful that I will be able . to return to work soon. 'Jr=l~/fW C"' "'I r,':-, ~......t.. ,,' ,- \:' '\ ~t.C:~..\\j\i::\) .." J /v'J~ Fred Reed ]) 1I~ [ - . . CITY OF ARDEN HILLS MEM:IU\NOOM DATE : J\me 4, 1992 TO: Mayor and City council FRCM: Dan Winkel, PUblio Works SUperintendent d.w SUBJECT: Resignation Notice fran Maureen Winkel I have received a resignation letter from Maureen Winkel in regards to the Building Maintenance position. 'Ihe letter stated that her resignation would take effect June 1, 1992. Maureen has done an - excellent job for the City during the past number of years. I was a little disheartened to recently find out that Maureen has not received a salary in=ease over the last three years. 'Ihe fonner Administrator had indicated he would propose an in=ease for the part tline help, but apparently did not do so in the 1992 Budget. Maureen cu=entlyearns $6.93 per hour. . I would like to keep Maureen in the city Hall maintenance position, and perhaps if offered an in=ease, she may consider staying in the position. I would reconnnend the position J::e paid $9.00 to $9.25 per hour for the duties performed. ~ATION: In view of the fact that Maureen has been very conscience about her job, and with the Council's approval, I would request authorization to offer Maureen $9.00 per hour to see if she would J::e interested in continuing in this position. If the Council detennines it is not appropriate at this tline, then I will begin searching for a new person immediately. ACrION RIDUIREO: If the council agrees with the staff recommendation, I will attenq:lt to negotiate wages with Maureen for $9.00 per hour. If the Council does not authorize an in=ease at this tline, I will begin searching for a replacement person and offer the cu=ent salary. W:rk . -- ~~t","~\"." (,~::-~ .:t,~;.-":~;. ,.".r',7.:'~,>_' ,-,. .:.t< ~"5'f;itift'~,gd~~'?It,~~," i<~-,t1t:iii.<;t~~ -, ~'~'$ '<~~'::' "'~.;: >~j;~i;~;~.,,"":':::' ~:,,!;,~' i., , ~;,r '.'. .", " , ~i;;.o!;,:' " ,,'J;t.,~ -:~,. <':~...<" .il ?oW 4;{ . !< ,,__,' :d," 4~' ~'r" <,.,,' ~ ~ ..'~~~,'> t ,<,,' ., , .-,<: - or : ~~~~~ J: \,~/~ "l.~r -;I '" 'co: ~'" -3f' .t~t~ :f~~~: ; ;'":~. -~".&":~..'., , .. i'L"J " ,;~ . - ~._- ------ 4" - ;~- , MDw'" -~m (6-10-92)~~.'. . " J\;.-,:: r' <>' -- '.l'IIIO - .'IIWR 8. 1992. - An.rJJ t!I'PY orq...... ~...+ ~.. . " -.,'t. '.. . . ,t: ~ ~"^ . ~ '~, -~ -"\ t.;; ,\. \ ,..~ ., j;:>t. ~ - r:~".(... ~ ~~. ' ;/ ,;'I 9. lINFINISHED AND Nl!Jf BUSINESS (o:.ntinued) :' 1, J .:if.c;: ;. E. Case #92-08; variance,' JeIliIIIlI ml~, 1~ At:d!lIn.View .~;...' , F. case #92-10;- Side Yard ~, 'Brie him, 34G5 Si, ,',,'.'" G. status ~ I. on SAC ChlmJIlII tar A1:'deh 1IIiIII1cZ__ ~ . '''<:, ~;' Filla (Vi ., ,~ At:t.arrIf!Ily erbal) . " :'t. ':-c:' ,. ~.. H I>isoosIJion of May P'inancJ,.el RIlpoJ: t:s '.ll JlII:Iri: it.. .', . ,.,...... . ......_ . -; __~/; '-, .-:::;!.".!j}h"'.-;i,>,. -'f:' -ii"~::,<~ , . '. .... ,_.,. . .:.;,f .:/"..\._,;..,....,: .J.. "f:-'c-"- I. Adl:ncItledl'Jil ~ipt of lllt- 171: far a 9O-<Iay .,~ 'rrt",:. :. '::,. ::';i AI ... fa:' Public WaI::ka Ia1pJ.llIyee . , .. ,it.,:..., "" . ,", ,. :iif~ -:" .. _', .,' _,. - _ ... _ ", __ '. _," _"'_"'<_--'~-:-'~~":'::',~h'>-l<-i".:,L::"'''-}I(:''' J. Reoeive - ignation fraalk1n"i:rIjJ Hd11'( ".. :~ I ~}II.~":III(; '. i~~~: ~ '. J\me 3 - Planni.n;J Cl:JI!Ia,. 7:30 PIll .:JUly 1 - P~G:IIIIll:1"".I"",{'. J\me 8 - OOl.n:Iil Mtg,7:30 PIll JUly 3 - lNDI!I!lHlJII\: _:~ J\me 15- OJurcl.l Wt.u:1.:st-don, 4:30 PIll JUly 13- Ccll:lnCiJ."IIillg; "7t~ '1: ,;it .... J\me 18- Public Safet.y,tWlcs, 7:30 pm JUly 16- Pu.bUc .sttl~;i"':~'Pa: .", . June 23- ~ & Rec Ccmm, 7:30 pm '.:JUly 23- Fi.nanoe,~i"lI'T' ~.:r PIt : " . J\me 25- FJ.J1!ll'lOe ctDm, 7:30 PIll JUly 27- ~'..) /1:, '?f; " June 29- Ccunci.l Mtg, 7:30 PIll JUly 28- Pat:lt Ie _~,'.3l) PIlt. . , ~~',.'; ". '~t~',:'t<,,_, ",__"""~" _;' ,ilk; ~i< ~!,;l1:~'12:~ " <, ....., ....1!I,"""<l....." ' ',' .~ :-;:-.:K ::i~'~i~~~';";'~",;i-:j;~ J;;<>: · '. ';"jj:i,e~~~~~:;i(:' ,;. ~.,. >'ij."F, , '> " .;:~,~'.; ~:;,~i .r~ ::fl~~:~:::f'~:<:":C'k~:.!1fi~. . ",' ~~V ,~;~ ".~, . , "1J~/~;~" '.';,.-' :'~ji~:i' ! ;c.,>);'. :!t",::-<"'.~' ~.~_......~_..-' ,', . ~, __..______n_UM . ~---" -.............. ~-;., ~.,.. -~---- - -~._.. ._,~~.--~~,._-'----'----- ~', .~ ., ....~ -,~.'--~ .,-.'", ~c,c ~ . J\RDEN HILLS CITY CXXJN::IL MEI!lrDn CXXJN::IL amMBERB JI:lIlDAY, JUJ!IE 8, 1992, 7 : 30 P.M. l. CALL 'ro ORDER/OOIL CALL. 7:30 P.M. 2. AGENDA ADOPI'ION 3. APPROVAL OF MAY 26 COUNCIL MINUI'ES 4. ~ENI'CALllIDAR . oL- Approve Bingo Hall License Renewal - Pot-<>-Gold Bingo Hall, 3776 Connelly Avenue. tl(.00 Approve ~ Order for Hazelnut Park Trail Improvements. 1-6. (iLAcknowledge Receipt of Budget Information. ,Q. ~ for Deferment of Special Assessments - Tiller Lane. ~. o(..Approve Salaries for Seasonal Parks and Recreation Employees. f. Approve List of Clailns/Payroll. 5. PUBLIC <XlMMENTS PllBLIC HEARJ:NGS: ,/ ASSESSMENI' HE1\RING FOR KEITHSON POND IMPROVEMENI'. 7:30 P.M. . A. lIdopt Res. No. 92-41l1dopting Final Assessment Roll. ~ IMPROVEMENI' HE1\RING - DUNU\P STREEl' IMPROVEMENI'S. 8:30 P.M. A. Adopt Res. No. 92-39 Ordering the Improvement in the Matter of the 1992 Dunlap street Improvement. B. lIdopt Res. No. 92-40 Approving Plans and Specifications and Ordering the Advertisement for Bids and Sche.:iuling Assessment Hearing-fQr :rllly 11 at 7.,n fl.lII. iP 'l"n", Matter of the 1992 Dunlap street Improvement. ~ IMPROVEMENI' HEl\RING - WEST ROUND lAKE OOULEVARD. 9:00 P.M. A. Adopt Res. No. 92-37 Ordering the Improvement in the Matter of the 1992 Round lake Road West Improvement. B. Adopt Res. No. 92-38 Approving Plans and Speci:fiications and Ordering the Advertisement for Bids and Sche.:iuling Assessment Hearing for July 13 at 7:30 p.m. in the Matter of the 1992 Round lake Road West Improvement. 9. lJNF'llIIISHED AND NEW BUSINESS ' ~ Planning Corrnnission Recamnendation to Consider Imposing a Development Moratorium. ur. Case #92-06; Amend SUP, Amoco oil Company, 1306 W. County Road E (Request to Table Action to July 13, 1992). (,-,-",+;",\).,,0. ~c:,K.i:ase #92-11; SUP, Twin City Pet SUpply, 1212 Red Fox Road. D. Case #92-07; variance, Frank and Mary Beth Ranallo, 1355 CUmmings Lane. (Verbal Request to Table Action to July 13, 1992 - Written . Request Available Monday). ~) /VYI~ #.,.-........... P1\GE 'l'liO - JUNE 8, 1992, ARDEN HILLS CITY <XXJN::IL M:EE:rIm 9. UNpNISHED AND NEW BUSINESS (Continued) ,I" . [E: ,Case #92-08; Variance, James Dlugosch, 1482 Arden view Drive. ~W (~ LY. p;(-case #92-10; Side Yard Variance, Evie Dunn, 3465 siems Court. v:r. status Report on SAC Olarges for Arden Manor Trailer Park, Attorney Filla (Verbal) . ~ Discussion of May Financial Reports - Terrance Post. I. ~ledge Receipt of Request for a 90-&iy Medical leave of Absence for Public Works Employee. ~ Receive Resignation from Building Maintenance Employee, Maureen Winkel. 10. OOUNCIL a:HlliNTS 11. AIXJOURN JUNE MEEI'INGS JULY MEEI'INGS June 3 - Planning Camm, 7:30 pm July 1 - Planning Camm, 7:30 pm June 8 - Council Mtg, 7: 30 pm July 3 - IlIDEPENDENCE DAY (HOLIDAY) June 15- Council Worksession, 4:30 pm July 13- Council Mtg, 7:30 pm June 18- Public SafetyfWks, 7:30 pm July 16- Public SftyjWks, 7:30 pm June 23- Park & Rec Camm, 7:30 pm July 23- Finance Carnm, 7:30 pm June 25- Finance Camm, 7:30 pm July 27- Council Mtg, 7:30 pm June 29- Council Mtg, 7:30 pm July 28- Park & Rec Carnm, 7:30 pm . I . ___0- _"""-_ ._~ . . . CITY OF ARDEN HILLS MEMrn1INDUM Dl\TE: June 6, 1992 TO: Mayor and city ColmCil FRCH: Catherine J. Iago, 1lcting Clerk 1\dmini.strator cJ SUBJECT: Keithson Area Pond StoDII sewer Il1IprOVEIDeI1ts Attached is a reJX>rt dated June 3, 1992, fram Engineer Mark Graham re:rarding the Keithson Area Pond stonn Sewer J11tlrovement and assessment hearing . Also attached is a copy of Resolution No. 92-41 Adopting the Final Assessment Roll and a list of properties. A letter from Attorney Filla re:rarding the status of the easement negotiations with Mr. Reiling is suJ::mitted and a request for the City to issue a check in the amount $16,680.00 to secure the easement was verbally suhnitted. Two residents have suJ::mitted written objections to the proposed assessment: Robert D. stennes, 4540 Keithson Drive and Rainer G. . Rocheleau, 4503 Keithson Drive. The letters are attached. At the close of the public hearing, Council should adopt Resolution No. 92-41 Adopting the Final Assessment Roll with any changes reccnmnended by staff member or the city Attorney. CJI/ts Attachments - . . CONSULTING ENGINEERS Maier Stewart & Associates Inc. MEMO TO: ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL FROM: MARK J. GRAHAM fr/G-- RE: KEITHSON AREA POND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS FILE NO: 520-029-20 DATE: JUNE 3, 1992 The assessment hearing for the Keithson Area Pond Storm Sewer Improvements is scheduled for the June 8, 1992 City Council meeting. As directed, a preliminary assessment roll has been prepared with a proposed assessment of $1500 per lot. This $1500 amount has been chosen based on the advice of the City's real estate appraiser. A copy of the preliminary assessment roll, dated May 18, 1992, is attached. The current status of this project is that the low bidder, Machtemes Construction, Inc. has been . awarded the project contingent on acquiring the right to enter Mr. George Reiling's property. City Attorney Filla has started condemnation proceedings through Ramsey County District Court to obtain this easement. The City will have access to the private property once the amount of the City's appraisal is provided to Mr. Reiling. An easement has also been obtained, at no cost, from the property owner south of the pond, Mr. George Crimmins, to construct the improvements. The Contractor would be able to begin as soon as the proper paperwork is completed and a preconstruction conference could be held. Following the close of the assessment hearing, it would be appropriate for the City Council to adopt a final assessment roll. A resolution is attached for your review and consideration. The resolution has been prepared at an interest rate of 8.00% and a pay-back period of five years. As of this writing, the City has not received any formal written assessment appeals from property owners. Individuals may appeal this project by presenting a signed, written objection to the Mayor at the hearing. An individual standing up at the public hearing indicating their objection to this project does not constitute as assessment appeal. Following the submission of the signed, written objection, the property also has to serve Notice of Appeal upon the Mayor or City Administrator within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment roll and must file this notice with the District Court within 10 days after serving the Mayor or City Administrator. Both myself and City Attorney Filla will be in attendance at the June 8, 1992 City Council meeting. Please contact me if you have any questions. MJG/ks attch. . 029-0301.JUN 1959 SLOAN PLACE. SUITE 200, ST, PAUL, MINNESOTA 55117 612-774-6021 9800 SHELARO PARKWAY. SUITE 102, MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESorA 55441 612-546-0432 . Equal Opportunity Employer . CITY OF ARDEN HILLS RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 92-~ A RESOLUTION ADOPTING FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL WHEREAS, upon due notice properly made as required by law, the Arden Hills City Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the 1992 Keithson Area Pond Improvements and has determined the amount to be assessed against each individual property as the Council deems just; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arden Hills, Minnesota: l. The final assessment roll, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, is hereby accepted and adopted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands therein names. Each such tract of land in the assessment roll is hereby found to be benefited by the improvement in an amount not less than the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments, including both principal and interest, amortized in such amount annually as is required to pay the principal with interest at 8.00% over a period of five years. . 3. The owner of any property so assessed, may, at any time prior to certification to the County Auditor of the assessment or the first installment thereof, pay to the City Treasurer the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment; except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days after the adoption of this Resolution. Prepayment may also be made after the certification of the assessment or first installment thereof by paying to the City Treasurer/County Auditor the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid with interest. In the case of a payment made before November 15, interest will be calculated through December 31 of the year in which payment is made. If payment is made after November 15, interest will be calculated through December 31 of the next succeeding year. - 4. The City Administrator shall transmit to the County Auditor a certified duplicate of the attached assessment roll to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such assessment shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Passed and adopted this 8th day of June, 1992 ATTEST: Thomas R. Sather, Mayor Catherine J. Iago Acting Clerk-Administrator . --- '-'--~'~--.--~-"--~~---'-~--'---- -- .-._--_.__.._.~--- -------- . .- PRELII'fINi"lR 1 ASSESSl'IENl1<otLFORIl:IETHSOJIM)~ - STORM SEWER POND IMPROVEMENTS ,,- CITY OF ARDEN HILLS MAY 18, 1992 ~-_.~----~.._._- ----- -~- -..._--- -------~._- -..----- ---.--- ----~~-, --- - - , "J FROP05ED LEGAL ~ PHI NUMBER NAME ASSESSMENT DESCRIPTION -' ..--..-.. -- - ------.. ---. ----. ,) -' KIETHSON DRIVE- HIGHWAY 96 TO DEAD END SOUTH ., !--c --------------------:-----------------------:-------------:--------------------: p 5; !'€! ;\.IUHN LAWTI:.K , ;LUltl 1 &: L , ~ 22-30-23-22-0025 :4539 KIETHSON DRIVE , $,1,500.00 :BLOCK 1 , '.-' , , :ARDEN HIllS, MN. 55112 , :KIETHSON ADDITION , ,'-' . , :~ ~: ____________________.r::::--_____________________ _ , ----- , . . , :RICHARD FOSTER . :lOT 3 , , , , , 22-30-23-22-0012 :4527 KIETHSON DRIVE , $,1,500.00 :BlOCK 1 , , , ;A~VcN HILLb~ nN. ~::HIL . ;KlfIHb~N ADDITION -- , . - ____________________1________________________1_____________1____________________1 ':31 . , . , ~ :P'lARK MAGERS , :LOTS 4 & PART OF 5 , . . ~~ ~Q ~~ ~~-QO~H ;45Z1'-lITETHSOfrURIVF . 111, ;)OU.. (}O~ Bt:nc~ , -- , , -- :ARDEN HIllS, MN. 55112 . :KIETHSON ADDITION . . , . --------------------.------------------______'______-----__1______-------------' . , , , ;bl:UHl:i1:. t..,.KlnnlNb . ;LUJ b , '01 . , --; 22-30-23-22-0015 :4509 KIETHSON DRIVE , $1,500.00 :BlOCK 1 , .:,,{ , . ~ &29 :ARDEN HIllS, MN. 55112 , :KIETHSON ADDITION , 3':1 . , , --------------~~~~~~~----------------------;-------------~~~~~=~~===~=~~~-: - :RAINER ROCHELEAU , :lOT 7 , ,~ , , '- 22-30-23-22-0027 :4503 KIETHSON DRIVE . $1,500.00 :BlOCK 1 . 33: . . ;A~UcN H1LL~~ nNa ~:UIL , :KltlflS~~lllON . 3':'{ , . ~ ____________________1________________________1_____________,____________________1 35\ . . . . - :ROBERT STENNES . :LOT 2 . 35, , - ~~-~o-:.!s-LL-o:OIlr-...__:1J51Ju Kl~ I H~UN DK~Vt:. ~l,:J.VV.uv ,J:1.LUCIr"-z- , ~ . :ARDEN HIllS, MN. 55112 :KIETHSON ADDITION . i... ~ . --------------------,------------------------ -----~---~*----------------~~~. ;39i . .. ~oI :rlILHHt.L bll:.L :lOT .) , , 22-30-23-22-0019 :4534 KIETHSON DRIVE $1,500.00 :BlOCK 2 . :4"j . fl.:::! :ARDEN HIllS, MN. 55112 :KIETHSON ADDITION , , __________________~~________________________r_____________I______________~_____, :,.1::.: . . . . ~ :ROBERT HIll , :lOT 4 , '.:.:.: , , 22-30-23-22-0020 :4528 KIETHSON DRIVE , $,1.500.00 :BlOCK 2 . .;.::; . . l4S! ;AHVl:.N HILL~, nN.. ~"112 , :KIETHSON ADDITION , , , --' --------------______'______------------______'______--_____1______--------------, -'; . . . , ....' :JIM ANDERSON , :lOT 5 , -:;, , . ~;t. "::;'U-":::..>-LL-UVLl :q"LL K1tlHSDNIDRlVE , .1,500.00 :BlOCK 2 , 4~; , . :ARDEN HILLS, "N. 55112 , :KIETHSON ADDITION , 5;;' , , - ____________________l________________________'______~______1____________________. S" . . . . . , , . 22-30-23-22-0022 :4516 KIETHSON DRIVE , $1,500.00 :BlOCK 2 , , " , . , <--j :ARDEN HIllS, MN. 55112 , :KIETHSON ADDITION , IS4j , . 5Sj ------------------~_._-----------------______I___--__--____,____________________, I I 11 f i ~ , .. PROPOSED LEGAL , _ PIN NUI'IBER NAI'IE ASSESS"ENT DESCRIPTION I- I ~ : ~ --------------------l------------------------:-------------:--------------------: :RON HORWATH : :LOT 7 : 22 30 23 .2.2 0023 :4~10 KIETHSON IJIl.IVE : U.500.00 :lItflCK-2 : --- ~ :ARDEN HILLS, "N. 55112: - :KIETHSON ADDITION : ~ --------------______1_--____-----------______1______-------1--------------------1 I::;: tIt I j'." : ROlli J<l::L50111 ; ; l:{ff-tl : ,~ 22-30-23-22-0024 :4504 KIETHSON DRIVE : f1,500.00 :BLOCK 2 : q : ARDEN HILLS, I'IN. 55112 : : KIETHSON ADDITION : . _______________ ' ___ - - - I ___ ___ "__ _ ' 3i f " I ~ ~. '.",">0,9" ~ ~cj (I .. c::J :':31 ;-; iL..:.l ~ ~3j t ~ 3~ ;J -:;-1 f:;3! ,,.1 , ~I ';;j " ~ . :"1 .",," -.-- 'c,/O" ('''-7 ~ 2{j . PETERSON, FRAM & BERGMAN tREAL PROPERTY lAW SPECIALIST WARREN E. PETERSON PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION *A150 ADMITTlm IN FLORIDA, JEROME I~ FILLA ILLINOIS, WASHINGTON D.C., DANIEL WITT FRAM 300 MID\\'EST FEDERAL BUILDING WISCONSIN GLENN A. llE.RG~'1AN 50 EAST FIFTH STREET - JOHN MICHAEL MILLER OF COUNSEL . GARY W. BECKER. ST. PAUL, MINNES01A SSJOl-U97 MEL~~fi~r~:~ TIMOTHY J. HASSE'nt ~ ~---'\\J' \ ~.' i ,,,., MICHAEL T. OBERLE (6U) 291-8955 ,'--'''2 ,-~ 's n . I ,"'~ ~,' '~\'\I I=. . FAX NO. (6U) 228-1753 '\ '. ~ -,,~,,'''''' .~ \, \ ,,~;c':;:""~ ..,.\ -..,.--..' ~ May 27, 1992 i 1'11\ '. .. Mark Craham ld \.\~_"'~' --.."._.,~ {_.: t.. '\'_~ ,.- . Maier stewart and Associates, Inc. :""~Slr";!,(H g.,.,';'v' ,.....,.. 1959 Sloan Place ::.:~._~~--~'- St. Paul, MN 55117 BY FACSIMILE AND U.S. MAIL RE: City of Arden Hills vs. George J. Reiling et al. District Court File No.: C6-91-12953 Our File No.: 11550/920001 Mark: Since the City's attempts to negotiate an Easement with Mr. Reiling were unsuccessful, the above-captioned Condemnation Proceeding was commenced in Ramsey County District Court. The . Easement areas which you have described on the Reiling property will be acquired through this process. I also served a Notice of Intent to Possess in connection with the Condemnation Proceeding. As soon as we tender to Mr. Reiling the amount of the City's appraisal, the City will be allowed to enter on the Reiling property for the purpose of constructing the improvement project. I have ordered the appropriate check from the City of Arden Hills. If you have any questions, please contact me. - Very truly yours, /:~J1;~PL JPF:bap t-::~~. Filla . ( , . l1INUTES CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING May 26, 1992 7:30 P.M. - city Hall i:;ALL_._1'O ORDER/ROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Councilmember Mahowald called to order the regular City council ITlseting -r 'h 7:30 p.m. Present: Councilmembers JoAnn Growe, Dale Hicks, Thomas Mahowald, Paul Malone. Mayor Sather arrived -" 7:50 c.c p.m. Also present were: City Attorney, .Jet-ry Filla; (-'., .;....T "-'oJ- --1 Engineer, Mark Graham; Public Works Superintendent, Dan Winkel; Acting Clerk Administrator, Catherine Iago. Hinutes transcribed from tape by Recording Secretary, Foster. ADOPT AGENDA MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Growe, to adopt the May .....1: Lv, 1992 agenda as presented. Motion carried unanimously (4- o ) . . APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MINUTES MOTION: Hicks moved, seconded by Malone, to approve the minutes of May 11, 1992 Regular Council Meeting as prepal>?d, Motion carried unanimously (4-0). CONSENT CALENDAR MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Growe to approve the Conse:::.'C Calendar and authorize execution or all necessary documents contained therein. Motion carried unanimously - (4-0) . a. Acknowledgement of Resolution No. 92-36 Accepting Bid and Authorizing Execution of Contract in the Matter of the 1992 Keithson Area storm Sewer Improvements. b. Approve List of Claims/Payroll. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. UNFINISHED AND ,NEW BUSINESS ORDINANCE NOS. 286 & 287- . RESIDENTIAL RECYCLING Attorney Filla advised that per Council direction given at the May 11, i 992 Council meeting, he drafted proposed Ordinance 287 relating to imposition of a residential recycl ing fee for -..----- , , Arden Hill s Council 2 May 26, 1992 . multi-family units and manufactured home parks. He added that the proposed ordinance imposes a fee unless proof is provided by July 15, 1992 of contracting with an alternative recycling service. Filla stated that based upon recommendations by the City's recycling hauler, he also drafted proposed Ordinance 286 which prohibits scavenging of recyclable materials. MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Hicks, to adopt Ordinance No. 286 Relating to the Scavenging of Recyclable Materials. Motion carried unanimously (4-0). MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Growe, to adopt ordinance N~. 287 Imposing a Residential Recycling Fee. Motion carried unani~ously (4-0). RESULTS OF 1991 AUDIT Gary Groen, of Abdo, Abdo & Eick, appeared before Council for the purpose of reviewing the City's 1991 audit report. Groen highlighted specific accounts comparing budget to actual figures. Groen reported that the City is realizing a 94% tax collection . rate. With regard to the negative variance in the general fund budget, Groen explained the primary reason is delinquent taxes. He also noted that the positive variance In Fire Services is due to reimbursements from 1989 and 1990 which were applied in 1991. Groen explained account transfers in and out and reviewed special funds, debt service funds, capital improvement funds, and enterprise funds giving some comparisons to previous years. In response to Councilmember Malone's inquiry, Groen provided clarification as to how interest is managed on special assessment bonds. Councilmember Mahowald asked Groen to describe the overall f inanc i a 1 pi ct ure of all funds. Groen compared the ma jor funds to previous years and stated the overall pict,ure lS "close to or better- than a year ago", Councilmember Malone drew attention to some notable cost overruns in the Publ ic Works and Recreation Program areas. Counci 1 direct.ed the Publ ic Works Superintendent and Parks Director to work with Groen to address those overruns and . provide Council with an analysis report at the next Council meeting. . Arden Hills Council 3 ~<ay 25, ~992 ARDEN PLACE DRAINAGt;, Mayor Sather arrived at '7, :::1: p.1'n. I . JJ Engineer Gl"ahara provided background on this lssue. ,-{;:;;' reported that a public hearing was held in October, 1991 whet,_ plans were presented to extend a 12" pipe Irom the " ,Lc;:'c:tL u'- 1553 Arden Place to the south toward Lake Johanna to correct drainage problems in the Arden Place area. Graham stated that further review of the situation was then delayed due to the extreme snowfall which began the end of October, 1991. Referring to his May 18, 1992 report, Gr-aham explained the pr-oposed layout of two drainage options and compared them as follows: Option 1 would be the most direct r-oute, however it would require extensive removal of existing trees, would present construction difficulties, and would require easement acquisition. The cost of Option .L would be about $17,000 plus easement acquisition. . Option 2 would be more favorable In that construction would take place in City owned right-of-way and would minimally affect existing trees. The cost of Option ~ " would be about $24,000. ~ ' recommended Option 2 and advised that Option 1 has \Jranam received some opposition from affected t'esidents. He added that either- option would provide an adequate solution to the drainage problem. - Councilmember Gr-owe asked to compar-e Option 1 and Option 2 relative to impact on existing trees. Graham said Option 1 would r-equire the removal of possible 15 - 18 treesl while he would hope that Option 2 could avoid any tr-ee removal. Councilmember Hicks inquired as to why the drainage and easement problem was not addressed when the house at 1553 was buil t . Graham stated there was a drainage pipe in place at that time and the placement of that pipe has not changed, but the pipe has been pi ugged for some time, therefore ineffective as a dr-ainage system. Wally Bauer, 1553 Ar-den Place, stated that when he bought his lot, he assumed the existing drainage pipe was adequate, then the city issued a building per-mit, the house was built, the . drainage pr-oblem was identified, and the City has tried to no avail to unplug the existing pipe. Arden Hills Council 4 May 26, 1992 . Public Works Superintendent Winkel reported that different methods have been used three or four times to unplug the existing 6" - 8" pipe, but have been unsuccessful. Councilmember Malone commented that information and options have become available since the October, 1991 public hearing, therefore it would be appropriate to hold another public hearing to help Council choose the least expensive, most appropriate solution. Councilmember Mahowald asked how many homes In the area contribute to the existing drainage problem. Graham said there are eight homes involved. - The question of cost for easement acquisition was raised. Attorney Filla advised that the City may have easement rights or may be able to negotiate for easement, and the cost of doing so may range from quite small to very significant. He added that if condemnation procedures were required, the cost of such procedures would exceed the difference in cost between Option , and Op ti on 2. Councilmember Hicks commented that ~ easement acquisition estimates are essential in comparing the two options. Dale Noyed, 3505 Ridgewood Road reported that he attended a . meeting at Johanna Beach club regarding a solution to this problem and there was no overwhelming support or opposition for any particular method to solve the problem. MOTION: Malone moved" seconded by Mahowald, to order a public hearing on the issue of Arden Place drainage to be held at 7:30 p.m. I June 29, 1992; and direct the Engineer to prepare comparisons of Options 1 and 2 for consideration. Motion carried unanimously (5-0). ~HARlrABLE GAMBLING RE~~~ATIONS Temporary City Accountant I Terry Post, reported that the City is tracking very well against budget in the area of.-charitable gambl ing operations. However, in reviewing the method of licensing, Post, noticed that most charitable gambling organizations are not complying with ordinance as it defines "gross profits" and this has created a disparity between what the City expects to be paid and what it is actually being paid by licensees. Post and At.torney ?i II a advised that the otdinance is consistent with State 1 aT,..;' and clearly defines the formula by which charitable gambling licensees are to calculate their . obligation to the City. That formula lS "Total gambling receipts, less prizes and awards, 1 eS$ allowable expenses, multiplied by 10% payable quarterly to the City. " . Al-den Hi 11 s c.)utlcil i'1ay : 392 - -, Post said his concern is that the majority or llcensees arf;: inel Lldi:ng t.axes as ar.;. l'a~lo';;Jable e::<:pen.s2". Tht:" es L.:l_~ ;:-. - - ." l, ,'J. ;~ rnost licensees are paying the City 10% aft~r taxes rather t~-.aL bei 0:>:': tazes, and the Cit.y is collecting about $60,00C: , .:.. (;:,':.;3 thaa ~ ~ should ok':;:".. At t():::ney Filla explained that. ' , is a TTlawful purpos e" for lc charitable gambling licensees to pay taxes, but taxes aLl::: no:. included as an "allowable expense" as defined by the State Gambling control Board. Post i den t.i f i ed three alternat.ive actions to address this issue: 1 ) Amend the ordinance to redefine licensees' obligation to the Cit.y; ~ , collect. retroactively from the L) licensees; 3) Clarify with licensees their obligat.ions per current ordinance. MOTION: Hicks movedl seconded by Growe, to notify charitable gambling licensees that effective July , 1992: .l, 1) The method of calculating their gross profits w" 1 ~" . be per ordinance, i.e. gambling receipt.s 1 ess prizes and awards, less allowable expenses, equal . gross profits; ')\ The City expects to receive 10% of gross profi ts; ~ J , \ Allowable expenses does not include any 1 evel of C>j taxes. counciirnembers Mahowald and Malone commentl:;d that lS seer:iS reasonable to incl ude certain expenses as l1allowable expenseslt, but perhaps computin.g t.he Cit.y's 10% based upon pre-tax figures could be construed -~ imposing a sort of 0... double jeopardy. - Mayor Sather commented that he would be incl ined to support Councilmember Hick's motion because the City must be responsible to collect from every appropriate legal :;::evenue source; in this case the City lS missing a revenue opportunity. Councilmember Malone commented that. it h'- become much more ~~<::l. .::> difficul t and time-consuming to administer and enforce charitable gambling operations than the City originally anticipated, Councilmember Mahowald suggested further thought and review of this item before taking action. . Councilmember Hicks withdrew his " Growe withdrew her mOL-lCn, second. --------- - Arden Hills Council 6 May 26, 1992 . Councilmember Hicks stated that licensees are not being treated equally and fairly, that most licensees are not all following the rules. He raised the possibility of amending the ordinance to continue the 10% pre-tax obligation to the City, but slightly reduce the extent to which licensees must contribute to the trade area. Council agreed to r-evisit this issue administratively. HIRING OF TEMPORARY PUBLIC WORKS EMPLOYEE Publi c Works Superintendent Winkel had provided Council with a request for authority to hire a full-time employee on .a temporary basis to assist the Public Works crew during the summer in light of the absence and uncertain return of employee Fred Reed. Winkel's recommendation was to extend employment to Philip Perron who has twenty years of sewer and water experience. HOTTON: Mahowald moved, seconded by Growe! to authorize the hiring of Philip Perron as a rull-time, temporaJ:Y Public WOJ:ks employee, effective June 1 through SeptembeJ: 1, 1992, at a J:ate or $11.35 per houJ:. Motion caJ:J:ied . unanimously (5-0). EXTENSION OF SICK LEAVE FOR PUBLIC WORKS EMPLOYEE Public Works SupeJ:intendent Winkel updated Council as to Public WOJ:ks employee, FJ:ed Reed's condition. Winkel repoJ:ted that when he wrote his May 22, 1992 memo requesting Council consideJ: extending additional sick leave fOJ: Reed he did so with the understanding that Reed ';/ould be returning to work prlor to the end of June; however, since that memo was written, Winkel has met with Reed and questions Reed's ability to J:etuJ:n to work and perform the duties or his job in the near future. Hinkel stated that fie , tal>.:ed .wi th Reed who understands nas tna'C siCK leave cannot be extended indefinitely. Winkel explained since Re!?c1's condition is not J:elated to a work injury, Reed is ineligible rOJ: wOJ:KeJ:s' compensation benefits, but is collecting some disability from his insurance company, and has used '-' accrued vacation! sick leave! and extended ulS sick leave to supplement his income. . . Arden Hills Council 7 Hay 26, 1992 Mayor Sather commented that it lS unrealistic to think that Reed could ever "pay back" the sick leave already extended, and he was concerned about extending additional ' , leave SlCI\. since there is the chance Reed will be unable to return to his job, and the City has already extended benefits beyond what Reed had accrued. The qtlestion was raised how other cities typically handle such a situation. Wink e 1 said that a poll of other cities indicated that granting medical leave or absence c,,;i t.b.out pay is a common practice, however, the employee would need to request that himself. Mayor Sather said he would support such leave for a finite period of time. - MOTION: Hicks moved, seconded by Malone, to: 1) Ask Fred Reed to use the balance of his accrued vacation time, 0\ Deny L ) additional extended sick leave, and 3) Request an opinion from Reed's doctor regarding an anticipated return to work date. Motion carried unanimously (5-0). APPROVAL TO PURCHASE TRACTOG Hinkel referred to his May 21, 1992 memo on this agenda item . which reported that the City has the opportunity to purchase a used 1988 Case 580-K Tractor/Backhoe, which appears to be in excellent condition, having been well maintained on a routine basis, for $25,000 f r orn Perron Sewer and Water Construction Company. Winkel said the purchase price of t.he tl-actor was $42,000 in 1988, it would sell for about $30,000 ' " and now tram a aealer, a new comparable tractor would be over $50,000. Winkel stated that the budget has $25,000 allocated for the purchase of a Bobcat, but that he '..lOuld prefer to take advantage of Lhe opportunity to purchase the tractor at this time with hopes of ;3,130 purchasing a Bobcat (perhaps used) using f :_ulds ,c;aved during the year from capital expenditures. 20uncilmember Hi.cks asked iftheC.ity currently has a backhce and tractor. Winkel said the City currently does not have a :oackhoe I and plans are to ,_~se t.he City'3 <:i..~Lrent t:ca.~tOl:: as ~ ;::.racle in whe~-l a Bobcat is purchased. C'ounci lmen'tber Halone encouraged WInkel to loo~ ':"0.L a UE.-;eG 3nhr.::at when the appropriate . . corne s tCJ IT:ake the p;~,~c~'la,5f:., <...lme :ouncilmember Hicks asked if Winkel COU....Cl negotiate a P:l:''::' ce less than $25JOOO for the Case tractot" . Winkel stated that. $25,000 1S already a ver-y good price given the c':Jnclitio:Ll and . ii:iaii-ltenance record, Council was reminded that the purchase would not be subject to sales tax .~ transacted before June l, 1992. 11. Arden Hills Council 8 May 26, 1992 . MOTION: Hicks moved, seconded by Mahowald, to authorize the expenditure of $25,000 for the purchase of a 1988 Case tractor/backhoe from Perron Sewer and Water. Motion carried unanimously (5-0) . AMEND JOB DESCRIPTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY Council referred to Acting Clerk Administrator Iago's May 22, 1992 memo wherein Iago suggested amending the job description of the Administrative Secretary to include serving as secretary to the Planning Commissionl attending Planning Commission meetings and preparing minutes. MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Hicks, to approve the use of Administrative Secretary Tery Shield's time as Recording Secretary for the Planning Commission and authorize the Acting Clerk Administrator to make the appropriate revisions to the current job description. Motion carried unani~ously (5-'0) . ~OUNCl~ COMMENTS HISTORY OF KEITHSON POND . Councilmember Hicks reported that the former City Engineering firm of SEH has promised to forward background material regarding the history of Keithson Pond. He said he would keep Council updated on this issue. Councilmember Mahowald, having been absent from the May 11, 1992 Council meeting, asked .~ Counci 1 determined an 1L assessment amount for Keithson Pond. Attorney Filla said that a range was identified, but no definite amount has yet been determined. FIRE DEPARTMENT UPDATE Councilmember Malone updated Council regarding the recent Lake Johanna Volunteer Fire Depat'tment Pension Fund meeting. NEW CI7Y HALL INITIAL MEETING Mahowald asked if a date has yet been scheduled for a meeting amongst staff and architects for the ner,"; City Hall, Acting Clerk Iago stated that arrangements have not been finalized yet, but that a morning meeting on June 10 is a possibility. . , . . . . Arden Hills Council 9 May 26, 1992 SCHEDULE JUNE WORKSESSION MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Hicks, to schedule a Council worksession to be held 4:30 p . m. on June 15, 1992. Motion carried unanimously (5-0). ADJOURN MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Hicks, to adjourn the meeting at 8:20 p.m. Motion carried unanimously (5-0) . Thomas R. Sathe1:, Mayor catherine J. I ago, Deputy Clerk - NOTICE OF MEETINGS: EThe next cegular Council meeting ~il1 be held June 8, 1992 at 7:30 :;., . ;T:. at. C:tyHall. -, next Council wOl-ksession will be held ,June 1 S 92 at 4;30 lfle - ~ ; p.m, . . . .. . CITY OF ARDEN HILlS MEM:Il1lNOOM DATE: JUne 2, 1992 TO: Mayor and City council FIlCH: catherine J. Iago, 1\cting Clerk 1\dm:ini.strator ~ ~ SUBJECT: Bingo Hall License ReneWal - Pot-o-Gold Attached is a bingo hall license renewal application fram the Pot-o-Gold Bingo Hall, 3776 Connelly. REO:>>lMENDATION : staff recorrnnends that this application be approved as requested. ACl'ION REOUIRED: If CoW1Cil =ncurs with the staff recommendation, they should pass a motion, 1.U1der Consent, approving the bingo hall license renewal . application as requested, pending approval of Ramsey County Sheriff's Deparbnent. CJI/ts Attachment, M92-182 - I . . FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Fee Date_ Chk Initial_ LG300 (Rov.1013019O) Minnesota Lawful Gambling License # . Bingo Hall License Application - Part 1 (See instructions for completion of tllis application) tp,/., /t1{1~ Is this application for a new license, or a renewal? 0 New ~enewal .flw - ~ Y/913S- 1, Name of bingo hall t3 P'V~o ~\(.\ \ \ Bingo Hall Phone County (where hall is located) C\R:Dt:;/0 \.1, \ \ So ((,/;1) 4>3/-/3/J" ;<{:)((JSciY Slreet address ~hall \ City or Township where hall is located SLale Zip code 3'11/..p Oo'JNI.;:;\ Y CUe. C-:li2.UI:;.-.J NIII ':. (nW -55 In. 2. Mailing address of bingo hall City Slate Zip code 3i7(p CONr.J~/I'1 (.JUI.;:; PI R.U<::><J )-1, II s fnlV 66//:).- 3. Is the bingo hall located within ci~ limits? Yes No CJ II 'No," indicate lownshlp in which bingo hall is located 4. Name of legal owner of bingo hall property Phone -+ 8 8 8:2 is w C\ I,....S 'n J:\N.i) r-l ~ s. ac... I AI C .s ( &,t,a) - Business Mailing Addrf;{ City p ~ Slate . Zip Code /0/3 T ON-r ~T '::;" Rv rJJ;U '65/0..3 . 5. Names of all owners, officers, directors, partners, managers and supervisors (each person named must fill oul a separate Bingo Hall Personnel Information form, LG315 and Affidavit, LG316) a. ~OlJ Il~ u.J f-::\\.-.~ \4 f. k, . b. ::ro~ ~ w A l- ~ 14 g, L cGoldle ':; l0dow h, m, d, i. n. e, j. o. 6. I ,........... -r;;:'rporation - L-.I Sole proprietorship I I Partnership 7. Have/do any persons listed in Items 4 and 5: Yes No a. been convicted of a felony? D d b. ever been convicted of a crime Involving gambling? D 0'" c. ever held a bingo hall license previously in Minnesota? [2] D d. OWe delinquent taxes in excess of $500 as defined in Minnesota Statutes section 270,72? D [0'" e. ever been convicted of assault, criminal violation involving the use of a firearm, or making D [!j" terroristic threats? . f. after demand, not filed tax returns required by the Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue? D ~ 8. Are any of the individuals listed in hems 4 or 5, or a person holding a financial or managerial interest in the bingo hall, or affiliate thereof -- D [!2( . a licensed distributor or affiliate of the distributor under section 349.161? . a licensed manufacturer or affiliate of the manufacturer under section 349.163? D [0" .-. Minnesota Lamfu! Gambling Bingo Hall License Application (LG300) - Part 2 . 1 declare that this application is correct and complele 10 Ihe best 01 my knowledge and beliel. I willlamiliarize mysell wilh the laws ollhe slale 01 Minnesola and rules of the Board regarding gambling and agree, if licensed, to abide by Ihose laws and rules, including amendmenls to Ihem. Changes in Ihe inlormalion submilted in Ihis application will be submilled 10 Ihe Board and local governmenl unll within len days afler Ihe change occurs, 9, Si9 ture 01 chiel executive olfi""::1~:rJr ~ Name (please print) Title ()-I-.J ~ W .s~ ?:J. J..OU1 - UJAl.sL '7Rc'i>,"!)c-..., . Nam 01 person completing this form TiUe Phone . /..., 0<; J IE. u..IA L 'S~ ?I1C'S ,'j)..._T ( 'IoU 411 J-' ~ ~4~ i_4~i:~g~l:mfft!ff(t:~~kJij~mtg~g~rrf~n'fliiji;iilliiiJlliJiiiiiilJll,iiJiiiilliil'lijii:iiiiiiiiiil'iliiliJliiiiiilL:;;;;;:;n 1. The city' must sign if the bingo hall is located within city limits. 2, The county" AND township" must sign if the bingo hall is located within a township. 3. The local government (city or county) must pass a resolution specifically approving or denying the application. - 4. A ropy of the resolution approving the application must be attached to the application. 5. An application which is denied by the locai governing body should not be submitted to the Gambling Control Division. Township By signature below, the township acknowledges that the organization is applying for a bingo hall license within township limits. City* or County** I TownshIp** 11. City or county name 112, Town,hip name . /7, G Sig 'tu I Signature of person receiving application , Date rec:::E:!ived Title - Township official Date received Is township? organized unorganized unincorporated 0 0 0 ~~~I~i.('1qI!!IJnr!~]1~nl~1!1(1gqIT~€~1IlR~!!g~~jliilljtlilljl~jjEil'iliil11ililjillliiiiiiijjJJ!!i!!ilili1ilfltiliii . Form LG300, Bingo Hall License Application, Parts 1 and 2 . Form LG302, Bingo Hall Occasion List . Form LG315, Bingo Hall Personnel Information (for each person listed in item 4 and 5 on form LG300) . Form LG316, Bingo Hall Affidavit, (for each person listed in item 4 and 5 on form LG300) . Check for license fee of $2,500, made payable to "State of Minnesota" Department of Gaming Gambling Control Division Rosewood Plaza South, 3rd Floor 1711 W. County Road B Roseville. MN 55113 . . I LO 1 C--.J ~--- co t/7 V> '- 0 0 0 ~ o > I ::..:: IUD:: 1: U ZLU <J) W O~ L5 i5 ::EO >- Z ::> 0 u ~u-Z Q w o=' ~ ~UJ .....:0 '.o;(=:J "U ~ ~" ..,U .., .., m ZW;g NW 'Sll!H N 1 96 ^BM~D!H JS8N\ ";V SlliH N30tl'tf ::lO d .~,uoqJe::J 918 18@ wucr.liCi3U . CITY OF 1\RDEN HILLS MEHEANOOM DATE: June 4, 1992 TO: Mayor and city Council , ,,-,/~' , , FRCH: John Buckley, Parks Ii Recreation Director) \ ~: Change order for Hazelnut Park Trail Project In conjnnction with the Hazelnut Park Trail Project, there are areas that could be paved to enhance this trail system; these include a 150 ft section of trail to connect Prior Ave to the Hazelnut trail loop, and a 100 ft section of roadway in the park which joins the tennis court and play structure. Bituminous Construction Company has indicated a willingness to do the additional work at the same rate quoted in the Cummings Trail bid. since excess materials were not removed from the Cummings Trail project, the city realized a $960 cost savings. Additional costs for the . enhancements proposed above should not exceed $1,500, and the original contract for the Cummings Trail improvement was bid at $21,321.90, which is a $3,000 savings fram the budgeted amonnt of $26,523. RE:<XOO1ENDATION: If Council concurs, they should pass a motion under Consent to approve O1ange Order No.1 in the amount of $1,500.00, for a total contract cost $22,821. 90 for the completion of the Hazelnut Park Trail Inprovement Project with the enhancements outlined. - JB:rk . ".' ... . CITY OF 1\RDEN lULLS MEKHmNDUM DATE : June 5, 1992 'lO: Mayor and city Council ]ilQoI: John Buckley, Parks & Recreation Director J rft' SUBJECT: 1991 Auditor Report Regarding P.LVY.La&Il Fund As directed by Council, Terry Post and I have researched the 1991 Auditor's report =ncerning the 1991 Program FUnd deficit. The 1991 expenses over blclget =ed in two main areas, Instructor fees and Building SUpervision costs. Mr. Post's report is more detailed and provides the experrliture informtion and comparison over the last 3 years. If you have questions, Terry and I will be available to discuss at the Council meeting. . JB:rk - . . . CITY OF ARDEN HILLS MEM:W>NOOM DATE: J\me 4, 1992 TO: JOM Buckley, Park & Recreation Director mw:.@ Terry Post, TEmporary city AcOOUntant SUBJECl': 1991 Recreation Program (FUnd 226) Deficit At the May 26, 1992 Council meeting, staff was directed to analyze the deficit Fund 226 in=ed in 1991. 'Ihe fund had budgeted and actual revenues and expenditures as follows: ACI'UAL 1991 BUIX;Er DESCRIPI'ION 1989 1990 1991 BUI:GEr \TAR 1992 RE\lENUE: -chgs for Services 55066 59985 77818 79275 <1457> 72590 PCT Chg Prev Yr. 8.9% 29.7% 32..2% <6.7%> . -other Income 1634 7886 1984 1630 354 2670 -I'I'otal Revenue 56700 67871 79802 80905 <1103> 75260 wlo Transfer EXPENDITURES : -SUpplies 9210 10018 9072 10870 1798 14079 PCT of SVc Fees 16.7% 16.7% 11.7% 13.7% 19.4% -Instructor Fees 26921 32985 37170 25000 <12170> 22000 Tenp Salaries + FICA -0- -0- 65 -0- < 65> 11842 - SUbtotal rnst. 26921 32985 37235 25000 <12235> 33842 PCT SVc Fees 48.9% 55.0% 47.8% 31.5% 46.6% -other Chgs & SVcs 7913 12029 15009 10530 < 4479> 15545 PCT SVc Fees 14.4% 20.1% 19.3% 13.3% 21.4% -Admin + Park Sal 15570 31545 44377 43162 < 1215> 47959 PCT SVc Fees 28.3% 52.6% 57.0% 54.4% -Fringe Benefits 2957 6344 8602 8372 < 230> 8146 PCT SVc Fees + Total Expenditures 62571 92921 114295 97934 <16361> 119899 ANALYSIS In reviewing the above data, two significant budget vs. actual deviations are apparent: lliS'lRUCTORS FEES . Actual expenditures of $37,170 created an unfavorable variance of $12,170. 'Ihe 1991 budgeted am.:JUJlt of $25,000 appears to be significantly low in light of history (Le.; Instructors Fees as a * . . 1991 Recreation Program (Fund 226) Deficit Page TWo percent of service fees averaged 52% in the two proceeding years) , and the projected revenue increase (i.e.; revenue fees increasing by 32% over previous year and Instructor fees decreasincr by 33%). OIHER CHARGES & SERVICES The remaining 1991 budget in this category excluding Instructor fees was $10,500. Actual expenditures were $15,009, creating a $4,509 unfavorable variance. The major source of the deviations are charges from Independent School District for building supervision fees. It appears that this variance stems from both inconsistent accrual treatment J:;etween 1990 and 1991 [specifically, in 1990 invoices for Fall 1989 and winter 1990 were charged to this expenditure category; while in 1991, invoices for Fall 1990, winter 1991 and Fall 1991 ($1695.61)J and higher fees being charged by Independent School District #621. <X>NCLUSION It appears that the 1991 Program Fi.1nd deficit has its primary cause in an unrealistically low 1991 hldget expenditure anlOrmt for Instructor Fees. The 1.992 hldget anlOrmt for this category seems reasonable. TP Irk . - . m - . CITY OF ARDEN HILLS MEKIOOIDUM DATE: June 4, 1992 TO: Mayor and City Council FRCH: Dan Winkel, Public works SUperintendent cluJ stJIl.:Jrel' : 1991 street Budget COst over-runs As per the change order that was approved by Council on June 18, 1991, the Pavement Management budget was in=eased to approximately $155,600. There was $125,000 in the hldget for 1991. This in=ease was due to the fact that O1atham court, Chatham Circle and Valentine Avenue were added to the program after the original hldget was ear-narked for other over- lay and seal coating projects. If the Council should have any further questions, I will be at the Council meeting on June 8, or please feel free to contact me at any time. . OO:rk - . . - . CITY OF ARDEN HILLS MEMalANDUM DATE: JUne 5, 1992 'lO: Mayor & Council ~ FRCI!:: catherine J. Iago, Acting Clerk Mministrator stJIlJEXlT : Request for Defennent of Special Assessments staff has reviewed the application for Defennent of Special Assessments of the Tiller Lane Improvement for Mrs. Betty J. Fan-, 3327 Dunlap street. Mrs. Farr has met age an:i hardship =iteria as set forth in Resolution No. 79-46. staff, therefore, recommends that Council approve the Deferral of Special Assessments related to the Tiller Lane Improvement. The taxpayer has been advised of the conditions that would terminate the deferral an:i has agreed to provide copies of the most recent tax return . on an annual basis to determine if financial hardship exists in future periods . ACTION REOUIRED: If Council concurs, they should pass a motion under Consent to approve the defennent an:i the information will then be fo:rwarded to Ran1sey County . TP/ts - . - .-- . - APPLICATION FOR DEFERMENT OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS . To the city council of the City of Arden Hills, Ramsey County, Minnesota. (Applicant) being first duly sworn deposes and states: 1. That the Applicant is the owner the following described real estate located in he city Arden Hills, Ramsey County, nnesota: & . 2. Pursuant to Minn. stat. S435.192, et. seq. and the Arden Hill assessment manual, Applicant requests deferral of the payment of special assessment for the 7l/~ XA'Av_-, improvement. 3 . In support of this request, Applicant represents as follows: e Applicant is over 65 years of age; b. Applicant is permanently and totally disabled as follows: . . c. Applicant I s adjusted gross income is $,J::z. 9.57.~:4.. 4. Applicant declares that the foregoing information is true and correct and agrees to immediately inform the Arden Hills Clerk Administrator should any of the foregoing information change, and agrees that if the deferral is granted, Applicant will immediately upon termination of the deferral pay to ~ity the deferred as sment with interest. ~cVvV _Dated t /7' c:<, nt Subscribed andS%Orn to 8 RENEE M. KAULFUSS before e this o'f/'^--' day ,.~:)T ARY PUBLIC.MINNESOTA of , -B&9 /7'7' 2r HENNEPIN COUNTY ~.:y Commission Expires ~-97 /J!~ - r --. . r ~ . CITY OF ARDEN HILLS MEMalANDUM DM'E: June 5, 1992 TO: Mayor and City Council FRCH: Cindy severtson, Program SUpervisor ~ v S SUBJECT: SUnIner Staff '!he following is a list of recomrnerrled hires for seasonal positions: I..uba Vanyo Playground SUpervisor $8.00/hr. CherylSandbakken Playground Leader $5.50/hr. Heather McClung Playground Leader $5.50/hr. Ball Skills Instructor $8.00/hr. Kelly Lieser Playground Leader $5.50/hr. Gymnastics Instructor $8.00/hr. . Kelly Gehrke Playground Leader $5.25/hr. Mark Farr Playground Leader $5.25/hr. Ball Skills Instructor $8.00/hr. Soccer Instructor $8.00/hr. Rhonda Waage Playground Leader $5. 25/hr. Corey stennes SOftball T.l'Ilpire $7.50/hr. - Julie Wild Tennis Instructor $8.00/hr. Soccer Instructor $8.00/hr. Beth Sawicki Tennis Instructor $7.50/hr. Kathy Casper Ceramics Instructor $11.25/hr. Rob Carley Golf Instructor $12.00/student stepping stone '!heatre Acting workshop $25.00/Session/Hour Lisa Torborg swi1llming Instructor $8.00/hr. Soccer Instructor $8.00/hr. Michelle Johnson Ball Skills Instructor $8.00/hr. . Dean Berkes Fishing Instructor $8.00/hr. - fI' . . SUMMER STAFF P1\GE TWO Kathleen Hollar Keyboard Instructor $10.00 Session REXX:M-lENDATION: staff recommends hiring the above individuals at the salaries listed. ACI'ION RIDUIRED: If Council concurs with the staff recommendation, they should pass a motion, under Consent, approving the above listed individuals & salaries for seasonal errq:>loyees. CS/ts . - . - .. "' . June 1, 1992 City of Arden Hills 1450 W. Highway 96 Arden Hills, MN 55115 Attention: City Administration Re: 1992 Keithson Area Holding Pond and Storm Sewer Improvements City Administration This is to serve as written notice to my objection to the assessment on my property at . 4540 Keithson Drive. It is unrealistic to think that the City can assess individual property owners for mistakes that the City Council, the City Engineer, the water shed district and the developer made in designing, installing and releasing the original project. Further more, the topography of my property has storm water flowing north to highway 96 and not to the Keithson road area. I am appealing my assessment at the June 8th meeting and will continue to appeal any assessments levied for this project. Sincerely, D A",,(-.;J..::;J ~. ~ dV 7Jfr1 of j;AAJf. ~ Robert D. Stennes 4540 Keithson Drive ~~~ Arden Hills, MN 55112 II ^i\f'1\,V,l",f\t.r'''..'I^^,\I",\^^j\f\^^^^^,~,/',\^MM. 1: ;j~l>. KENrmH H. RADEMACHER I ;:.:;f"~~: liOTARY PUBLlC-MIIJNESOTA ::: '~\.~....., WASHI~JGTON COuNTY ~ My Comm. Expires Aug. 6, 1992 .. vvvVVVVVVVV\lYVVVWVWV\IVVVWVI/VVW III . ~K~/ ~C&r~ ~ Ji,J, 0 1992 ~ . " . Rainer G. Rocheleau 4503 Keithson Drive Arden Hills, MN 55112 June 3, 1992 City Administrator Ci ty Hall 1450 W. Hwy 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112 Dear City Administrator: This is a written objection to the assessment for me and other members of Keithson Drive regarding the 1992 Keithson area holding pond and storm sewer improvement. I would like to make my oral objection at the upcoming meeting dated, June 8, 1992 . . Sincerely, . ..liL 0~v~ ""'- R. G. Rocheleau, M.D. RGR:jkc - RECEIVEP j~ . ~1fb .. V . . CITY OF ARDEN HILLS . MEMalANDUM DM'E: J\me 5, 1992 TO: Mayor and city Council .... 1 FRCH: catherine J. Iago, Acting Clerk 1\dmini.strator W ~: Public Hearings for street Improvements - Round Lake Road West and Dunlap street Attached is a report dated June 3, 1992, from Engineer Mark Graham regarding 1992 Round Lake Road West and Dunlap street Recycling Improvements . ACI'ION REDUIRED: After the close of the public hearings, Council should adopt the following resolutions: ROUND lAKE ROAD WEST IMPROVEMENT: . Resolution No. 92-37 Ordering the Improvement in the Matter of the 1992 Round Lake Road West Improvement and Resolution No. 92-38 Approving the Plans and Specifications and Ordering the Advertisement for Bids in the matter of the 1992 Round Lake Road West Improvement. DUNIAP STREEI' IMPROVEMENT: Resolution No. 92-39 Ordering the Improvement in the Matter of the 1992 Dunlap street Improvement and Resolution No. 40 Approving the - Plans and Specifications and Ordering the Advertisement for Bids in the matter of the 1992 Dunlap street Improvements. CJI/ts Attaclnnents . . CONSULTING ENGINEERS Maier Stewart & Associates Inc. MEMO W: ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL FROM: MARK J. GRAHAM (VI&' RE: 1992 ROUND LAKE ROAD WEST AND DUNLAP STREET RECYCLING IMPROVEMENTS FILE NO: 520-034-20 AND 520-035-20 DATE: JUNE 3, 1992 The public hearings for street recycling improvements on Round Lake Road West and Dunlap Street are separately scheduled for the June 8, 1992 City Council meeting. Plans and specifications for this project have been prepared and are enclosed. We can provide a brief presentation at each public hearing regarding the scope and anticipated schedule for the project. . Following the close of each public hearing, it would be appropriate to consider the attached resolutions ordering the improvement, approving the plans and specifications and ordering advertisement of bids. For each project, the resolution ordering the improvement should be considered first. These bids would be available at the July 13, 1992 City Council meeting. The estimated construction cost, based on Ramsey County information, for Round Lake Road West is $70,200 and for Dunlap Street is $38,200. Given that both projects are identical in construction, we intend to bid them as one project with separate bid schedules. Folowing receipt of bids, the next step would be to set a date to hold an assessment hearing for each proj ecL I will be in attendance at the June 8, 1992 City Council meeting to further discuss this matter. Please contact me if you have any questions. MJG/ks attch. 035-0301.JUN . 1959 SLOAN PLACE, SUITE 200, ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55117 612-774-6021 9800 SHELARD PARKWAY, SUITE 102, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNEsarA 55441 612.546-0432. Equal Opportunity Employer CITY OF ARDEN HILLS . RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 92- 37 - A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENT IN THE MATTER OF TIlE 1992 ROUND LAKE ROAD WEST IMPROVEMENT WHEREAS, a public hearing relating to the 1992 Round Lake Road West Improvement was held before the Arden Hills City Council after ten days mailed notice and two weeks published notice of the hearing was given; and WHEREAS, the City Council has duly considered the Feasibility Report and those matters presented at the public hearing by those persons desiring to be heard on the matter; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arden Hills, Minnesota: 1. The 1992 Round Lake Road West Improvements for cold in-place recycling is hereby ordered as recommended in the Feasibility Report dated April 8, 1992. Passed and adopted this 8th day of June, 1992. . ATIEST: Thomas R. Sather, Mayor Catherine J. Iago Acting Clerk-Administrator - . . CITY OF ARDEN HILLS RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 92- 38 A RESOLUTION APPROVlNG THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERlNG THE ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS IN THE MATTER OF THE 1992 ROUND LAKE ROAD WEST IMPROVEMENT WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution 92-26, the Project Engineer has prepared plans and specifications for the 1992 Round Lake Road West Improvement, which plans and specifications have been reviewed by the City; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arden Hills, Minnesota: l. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, are hereby approved. 2. The City Administrator shall prepare and obtain the publication of an advertisement for bids for the making of the improvement pursuant to the attached plans and specification. The advertisement shall be published one each week for three consecutive weeks, shall specify the work to be done, and shall state that the bids will be received by the City Administrator until 10:00 a.m. on July 9, 1992, at which time the bids will be publicly opened in the Council chambers of the City Hall by the City Administrator and the Project . Engineer and will then be tabulated for the consideration by the City Council at a meeting thereof at 7:30 o'clock in the p.m. on July 13, 1992, in the City Council chambers at City Hall. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the City Administrator and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond, or certified check payable to the City Administrator in the amount of 5 % of the amount of such bid. Passed and adopted this 8th day of June, 1992. - ATTEST: Thomas R. Sather, Mayor Catherine J. Iago Acting Clerk-Administrator . CITY OF ARDEN HILLS . RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 92- 40 - A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING THE ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS IN THE MATTER OF THE 1992 DUNLAP STREET IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution 92-33, the Project Engineer has prepared plans and specifications for the 1992 Dunlap Street Improvements, which plans and specifications have been reviewed by the City; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arden Hills, Minnesota: l. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, are hereby approved. 2. The City Administrator shall prepare and obtain the publication of an advertisement for bids for the making of the improvement pursuant to the attached plans and specification. The advertisement shall be published one each week for three consecutive weeks, shall specify the work to be done, and shall state that the bids will be received by the City Administrator until 10:00 a.m. on July 9, 1992, at which time the bids will be publicly opened in the Council chambers of the City Hall by the City Administrator and the Project . Engineer and will then be tabulated for the consideration by the City Council at a meeting thereof at 7:30 o'clock in the p.m. on July 13, 1992, in the City Council chambers at City HalL No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the City Administrator and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond, or certified check payable to the City Administrator in the amount of 5 % of the amount of such bid. Passed and adopted this 8th day of June, 1992. - ATTEST: Thomas R. Sather, Mayor Catherine J. Iago Acting Clerk-Administrator . . . CITY OF ARDEN HILLS RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 92- 39 A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENT IN THE MATTER OF THE 1992 DUNLAP STREET IMPROVEMENT WHEREAS, a public hearing relating to the 1992 Dunlap Street Improvement was held before the Arden Hills City Council after ten days mailed notice and two weeks published notice of the hearing was given; and WHEREAS, the City Council has duly considered the Feasibility Report and those matters presented at the public hearing by those persons desiring to be heard on the matter; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arden Hills, Minnesota: 1. The 1992 Dunlap Street Improvements for cold in-place recycling is hereby ordered as recommended in the Feasibility Report dated May 6, 1992. Passed and adopted this 8th day of June, 1992. . ATTEST: Thomas R. Sather, Mayor Catherine J. Iago Acting Clerk-Administrator - . , . MINUTES OF THE ARDEN HILLS l'L1INNIm <:nIMISSION MEE:l'Im . ~Y, JUNE 3, 1992, 7:30 P.M. - CITY HALL ClU.oL TO C1IU>ER: Chair Probst called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. ROLL ClU.oL: Present: Chair Dennis Probst, Members Dave Carlson, Barbara PiotrCMSki, steve Edckson, Jeanne w:iniecki, Scott Petersen and Council Liaison '!homas Mahowald. Absent: Member Raymond Mo3raw. Also present: Planner John Bergly, Acting Clerk Administrator Catherine Iago, and Recording Secretary Tery Shields. APPROVE MINUTES: Petersen nnved, seconded by Erickson, to approve the May 6, 1992, Planning Minutes as sul:mitted. All voted in favor. (6-0) PUBLIC JIElUUK; - Cl\SE #92-06: SUP 1\MENI:MEIfi WITH VARIANCES. 1306 W. CO. ROllI> E. AKJCO OIL cx:MPANY: Chair Probst opened the meeting at 7:32 p.m. for the purpose of a public hearing on Case #92-06, SUP Amendment with variances, 1306 W. Co. Road E, Amoco oil Conpmy. . Acting Clerk Administrator Catherine Iago confirmed the publication of the Notice of Hearing in the New Briohton Bulletin on Wednesday, May 20, and miling to affected property owners on Tuesday, May 19. Plarmer Bergly referred to his report dated 6-03-92, and eJq:llained the applicant proposes to amend SUP 86-27, to allow the present car wash to be converted into a third service bay, and anew, enlarged car wash to be attached to the east side of the existing structure. The application also requires granting a 10-foot side yard variance frOll1 the east property line, twenty feet is required for a _principal building and 10 feet is proposed. '!he variance would be frOll1 the requlations listed in Sec. VI, C, (2), (a), 3., of the Zoning Code, which requires a minimum of 15 feet for a rear yard landscape area. The Planner reviewed the history of SUP 86-27 that allowed the present car wash and required miscellaneous site i1rq:lrovements. '!he present application needs to address the following issues: 1. Does the conversion of the existing car wash into a service bay and the addition of a new car wash make the use too intense for the site? 2. Have all the conditions of the 86-27 SUP been addressed? 3. Are there alternatives that do not require the side yard and landscaped rear yard variances proposed? 4. will parking provided be adequate for the expanded use? 5. will the circulation pattern add to the on-site congestion or help minimize it? . . ' Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular P1anni.ng ocmnission Meeting , 6-3-92 Page 2 . CASE #92-06 (cx:Nl"D): '!he Planner also reviewed the findings listed in his report arrl. stated the main =ncern should be intensity of use on the property. One additional service bay will in=ease the maintenance arrl. repair portion of the b.lsiness by 50 percent. The intensity will manifest itself by on-site circulation of vehicles and parking . Bergly explained the parking requirement is for 3 cars for each service bay, plus 1 for each errq:>loyee on the major shift. Approximately 20 parking spaces are available for additional parking in the Great Lake Restaurant parking lot adjacent to this site. Bergly also stated the actual need for parking in this operation far exceeds ordinance requirements. Planner Bergly expressed concern that the applicant has not meet conditions of the previous SUP 86-27. '!he dumpster enclosure is not being used for the trash. It is currently l=ated west of the building, in a parking stall, arrl. cars are frequently parked in front of it. Bergly advised that a propane dispensing facility was proposed in July, 1991, however, the application was never filed. '!he soil remediation process on-site is ongoing arrl. is l=ated in the SW =rner of the site. Previous owners had leakage problems from the underground tanks arrl. were atterrq:>ting to resolve the issue. A wilding to house the remediation facilities was proposed, Case #91-20, arrl. staffed recieved two requests to delay . action on the item. Bergly advised he met with Architect Harry Shroeder, to discuss options f= placement of the car wash arrl. 3 options for the proposed elipClI1Sion were discussed; Option A is the east end car wash, Option B is the south side car wash, arrl. Option C is the west end placement. Advantages arrl. disadvantages were briefly discussed for each option. Bergly stated his opposition to Options B arrl. C due to lack of landscaping, uncertainty of the placement of the remediation facilities, arrl. uncertainty of the status of the proposed propane dispensing .station. The Planner also advised his concern regarding wash water being directed to the sewer syteIn; questioned if the water is being recycled or flushed immediately into the sanitary sewer system arrl. noted the Metropolitan Waste Control Canmission (MWCC) arrl. Minnesota Pollution Control Age.rcy (MPCA) require a permit to dispose water into the system. Chair Probst questioned if Option B & C require any variances. Bergly advised Option C has a slight infringement on the 15-foot landscaped end of the arrl. stated the parking scheme is the same the existing parking scheme arrl. should be required to have more parking. Option B does not show parking on the west side that could be provided arrl. is within 10 feet of the property line as a separate building. It is considered an accessory building arrl. no variance is necessary. . . - . Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Planning Camlission Meeting, 6-03-92 Page 3 CJ\SE #92-06 (CONl"D): Architect Harry Schroeder, stated Amoco is proposing only Option A, and would prefer Options B and C not be considered. Bergly advised the OJrnmission should review all options before making a decision on this application. Member Erickson questioned if the scope of the original Special Use Permit was for a car wash. Bergly stated the original Special Use Permit was issued at the time of application for the car wash expansion; the b..Lsiness was "grand-fathered" in and is a use permitted in the B-2 District by SUP. When the application for the car wash was reviewed, an SUP was granted which incorporated the entire facility and all operations as part of the Special Use Permit, not just the car wash. Chair Probst asked if there are any questions or comments for Planner Bergly. '!here was discussion regarding the access easements and parking agreement between the adjacent sites. . Member Petersen questioned if the existing parking is adequate for the restaurant with the use by Amoco. Bergly advised the parking is apparently adequate f= the Great Lakes Restaurant patrons and is based on number of parking stalls versus number of seats in the restaurant. Chair Probst asked if there were any questions or comments from the floor. _Architect Harry Schroeder, discussed how Option A addressed the concerns of the Dentist office; parking, appearance, headlights, noise and traffic movements, during all hours. He stated Amoco oil ColTpany only supports Option A. Schroeder also stated an Engineering ColTpany working on the remediation system and at this time the application has been delayed due to hJdget constraints; indicated this matter may return in August. He explained that the remediation station would be a 10' by 12' structure tucked in the back of the building. '!his structure would house purrq:lS and testing equipment and is strictly a terrq:>orary wilding . Mr. Schroeder continued to explain that the traffic con:Jestion problem is due to high volumes of customers needing repair work and the additiona service bay may help eliminate the con:Jestion, move customers through the site faster, and reduce parking needs. He also stated they have built 20 to 30 stations in the Twin cities area and the requirement for recycling water has not been an issue. He . stated that Amoco oil ColTpany would provide documentation, if nE'C'1?"'-=ry. , . Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular P1.ann:ing ocmni.ssion Meeting, 6-03-92 Page 4 . ~E #92-06 lCONT'D): '!he Architect explained the car wash equipment does not cormnence washing vehicles until they are completely within the car wash bay, which should eliminate any noise to adjacent site. '!he only possible noise my be caused from the dryers when the cars exit the bay. '!he proposed driers are to eliminate residual dripping and excess water before vehicles enter the street. He stated he feels that Option A is the most conducive alternative for the general public, the surrounding neighbors and the car wash site. Chair Probst asked if there were any questions. 'Ihe Planner stated the owner of the Dentist Office, Dr. Anderson, prefers Option A because of the removal of parking and the more intensive landscaping that could be place along the property line. Ted Brauson, owner of the Amoco station, supported Option A. Chair Probst asked if there was anyone present to speak in favor of or opposed to this project. Dr. Anderson, owner of the Dentist office, expressed =ncern that the water . dripping from existing vehicles my cause icy =nditions at the easterly driveway/access to his property. He also requested sufficient landscaping on the east property line so that no headlights would shine into the office reception area. Chair Probst asked if there were any questions from the members. Member Carlson questioned the age of the underground tanks. Ted Brausen advised tanks are five years old and meet all pollution control .;r-equirements. He also stated the proposed propane dispensing station was being pursued at the request of the Ramsey County Sheriff's Deparbnerrt, for use as a back-up system. He advised he has no interest in pursuing the dispensing station. Chair Probst stated there were 2 fundamental issues for Commission to address: 1. Whether or not the additional intensity of use will be acceptable; and 2. Resolution of a number of open items in conjunction with the original SUP and proposed future use of the site. Member winiecki expressed concern regarding the SUP Amendment and stated her strong opposition to Option A, base don the intense use of the site. Chair Probst stated concerns regarding the trash enclosures and described other sites that have created problems. . . Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Planning Camlission Meeting, 6-03-92 Page 5 Cl\SE #92-06 (cx:tn"DI: Member Carlson stated his concerns relating to the intensity of use of the station. He suggested Amoco oil Company and the city meet to discuss the development of the lot. Chair Probst asked if there was anyone present to speak in favor of or opposed to this matter. Hearing no response, the public hearing was closed at 8:25 p.m. Petersen moved, seconded by piotrowski that Commission recommend to Council denial of Case #92-06; SUP Amen::lment with variance, 1306 W. Co. Road E, Amoco oil Company, as suhnitted with Option A, based on the fact there does not appear to be an identifiable hardship to warrant the variance request. Motion carried unanimously. (6-0) PUBLIC HEl\RIN3: C1lSE #92-11; SPECIAL USE PEmUT, 1212 RED FOX ROlID, TWIN CITY PET SUPPLY CO. , IN::.: Chair Probst opened the meeting at 8:25 p.m. for the purpose of a public hearing on Case #92-11, Special Use permit to allow sale of pet supplies, club meetings, . pet seminars and dog training in the B-4 District, 1212 Red Fox Road, Twin city Pet SUpply Co., Inc. Acting Clerk Administrator Catherine Iago confirmed the publication of the Notice of Hearing in the New Briahton Bulletin on Wednesday, May 20, and mailing to affected property owners on Tuesday, May 19, 1992. Planner Bergly reviewed his report dated June 3, 1992, relating to Special Use Permit to allow dog training in the B-4 District, 1212 Red Fox Road, Twin city Pet SUpply Co., Inc. Bergly explained that the Applicant has requested a proposed use not listed as a permitted use or use by Special Use Permit in the list of District uses. He stated the Zoning Ordinance (Section V, C) provides a means whereby the Commission and Council can determine whether it falls within a permitted or Special Use category. The Commission reviewed this issue at the May 6 meeting and recommended it be treated as a Special Use requiring a Special Use Permit. '!he Planner reviewed the background of the Applicant I s request and stated that parking is more than adequate and no site plan or exterior building changes are proposed . He further stated this would qualify as a transitional use even if the uses were not permitted in the new B-4 District but permitted in the previous 1-2 District. Bergly reviewed the findings listed in his report and stated that this issue is a use where no single use is predominant and no single use is clearly accessory. . He stated the training area is the only segment of the use that would not be considered a permitted use in the B-4 District. ---..- - -----...-- Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Planning ocmnission Meeting, 6-03-92 . Page 6 Cl\SE #92-11 (CCINl" D) : 'Ihe Planner explained most an:iml related uses require Special Use Permits when aniJnals are kept overnight = lon:J"er. In this use, the training portion requires the dog owner to participate for one or two hours at a time. '!here will be no evidence that the use involves animals. Existing parking lot a=ommodates 60 cars and approximately 30 cars will be will be on site during training. '!he Planner stated the applicants feel the mjority of clients will purchase retail products. Training classes are in the evening and will induce traffic on Red Fox and Lexington over a longer period of time. Bergly explained that a similar facility is located in Burnsville and is allowed as a permitted use. Planner Bergly concluded to recommend the first action should be to determine if this type of use should be considered an allowable use with a Special Use Permit in the B-4 District. '!he second action would be to approve or deny the applicants' request. Bergly recommended a =ndition be attached to the permit to allow the City to review the operation after one year. '!his would allow discussion after the use if operating at nearly full capacity. Bergly stated the Fire Marshall has slight modifications to the building that he would like to recommend. Bergly recomrnerrled approval subject to the Fire Marshall's review. . Chair Probst advised the City Attorney requested infonnation regarding evidence of title before the SUP is filed. He asked if there were any questions. Acting Clerk Administrator Catherine Iago questioned if the city should require a copy of the lease agreement; Delta Envirornnental and Zeos were required to suJ:xnit copies of leases as conditions of approval of applications in the lexington-Fox Business area. Bergly agreed this my be :i.rrq:xJsed as a condition of approval of this application. - Letty Afong, CMner, stated her business would add to the Cormnunity by assisting responsible dog owners professional training for their pets. She also stated classes would be held from 6:30 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. Members Carlson and Erickson questioned the issues of noise and animal droppings. Ms. Afong advised she had not discussed the noise issue with her neighbors and the parking lot would be cleaned once = twice per day to alleviate any dog droppings from the parking lot. Member Petersen questioned if 'IWin city Pet SUpply would be selling aniJnals. Member winiecki expressed concern that no signage proposal was received. . . Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Planning ccmnission Meeting, 6-03-92 Page 7 CASE #92-11 (a:tl'r'DI: Ms. Afong informed her J::m;iness caters to vetranarians and kennels and she sells only food and supplies. She stated she also holds educational seminars and club meetings; with the possibility of adding. 'Ihe signage has not been determined at this time, however, she stated it will conform to sign regulations. Chair Probst asked if there was anyone present to speak in favor of or opposed to this matter. Eugene and Darlene Frobragd, OWner, stated his support of the Special Use Permit. Chair Probst. ask if there were any other questions or conunents. Hearing no response, the public hearing was closed at 8:37 p.m. Member winiecki advised there is an abandoned flag at the site and unless it is lighted, it should be removed. Winiecki moved, seconded by Carlson, that Cornrnission recommend to Council approval of Case #92-11; Special Use Permit, 1212 Red Fox Road, 'IWin city Pet SUpply Co., Inc. in a B-4 District with the following conditions: . 1. '!he city be allowed to review the operation in one year. 2. 'Ihe applicant provide a copy of the lease and evidence of title. 3. '!he applicant comply with any stipultions of the Fire Marshall. Motion carried unanimoUSly. (6-0) CASE #92-07 - VARIAN:::E. 1355 ClIMMINGS LANE. RANlU.LO: Planner Bergly reviewed his report dated 6-03-92, relating to the variance ]:"equest to allow a 10 foot solid wall, 1355 CUmmings Lane, Frank and Mary Beth Ranallo. Bergly explained since the construction of the Ranallo home in the mid-1980's which faces North HaInline Avenue, traffic noise, speed, and miscellaneous debris have excessively in=easecl. He advised the applicant is requesting to construct a 10 foot high solid western red fence sound barrier between the highway ReM and the frontage road drive. Bergly stated the Zoning Ordinance prohibits fences or solid walls higher than 10 feet in the front yard and requires fences be at least 30 percent open for passage of air and light. '!he Planner reviewed the findings listed in his report and noted the fence provisions in the Ordinance were established to allow fences f= enclosures (or separations) and visual screenin. He indicated =iteria for enclosing and screening is somewhat different than =iteria for reducing sound. Bergly also stated the applicant installed a dense evergreen screen (now 8 I to 10' high) in . the area where the fence is proposed and until the evergreens mature, the height and density are not adequate f= an effective sound barrier. , . Minutes of the 1lrden Hills Regular Planning ('nnmi"sion Meeting, 6-03-92 Pages . CASE #92-11 (can"D): Bergly indicated he visited the site during non-peak traffic hours and the noise was unacceptable and the applicant states the noise is worsening. The Plarmer also indicated that the fence would not create a hardship for neighboring property and would not be obtrusive on the highway. The Planner concluded with the following items: 1. Variances from literal provisions of the Ordinance are allowed where strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances lU1ique to the property. In this case, the literal fence provisions were not intended to apply to sound barriers. 2. Although this noise problem is not unique to this lot, it is unique to . lots along highway frontage roads. 3. The hardship is real to the occupants and visitors to the site and the noise impact is not present on most properties in the city. 4. The owners have atterrq:>ted to deal with the problem through a natural barrier . '!his variance is from Section VI, E, (7) , (c) of the Zoning Ordinance to allow a 10-foot solid wall instead of the permitted 3 foot wall in a front yard. COrmnission discussed the following relating to the proposed fence: . 1. No information provided relating to sound decibels levels. 2. No information relating to established noise criteria which warrants fencing along the highway. 3. Sound abatement treatment. 4. Placement of fences by residents on state-owned highways. Frank Ranallo, OWner , was agreeable to atterrq:>ting to gather and suhnit the information discussed. - Member Petersen advised he favored denying the applicant, based on the lack of identifiable hardship. Chair Probst opposed recommending denial of the request; stated the COrmnission does not have enough information to make a reconunendation. He suggested the Applicant to obtain information on established criteria for placement of a sound wall from MnDOl'. Member winiecki stated the COrmnission needs decibel figures and mqJert advice if a 10-foot fence would eliminate their noise problem. Petersen moved, se=nded by Edckson that COrmnisson recannnend to ColU1cil denial of Case #92-07, Variance to allow a 10 foot solid wall based on no identifiable hardship. Motion carried. (Carlson, Erickson, Petersen, Piotrowski, winiecki voting in fav=; Probst opposed). (5-1) . Minutes of the 1\rden Hills Regular Planning Ocmnission Meeting, 6-03-92 . Page 9 ~E #92-11 (CONT'D): It was suggested that Ranallo provide the information prior to Council action on this matter or a request that action on the matter be delayed until receipt of the information relating to the fence. Acting Clerk Administrator Catherine Iago suggested Mr-. Ranallo contact Mary Bierenger at MnDOr obtain sound wall and decibel informatiol) as a guideline. Member Barbara piotrowski left the meeting at 9:05 p.m. ~E #92-08: V1IRI1'IN::E. 1717 PARKSIICRE DRIVE #1112. DLUGOSCH: Planner Bergly review his report dated 6-03-92, relating to the variance request to allow a 6 foot fenced wall in a residential side yard (2 1/2 foot variance for solid wall or a variance from the 30 percent open requirement), 1717 parksh=e Drive #1112, James Dlugosch. Bergly explained the applicant proposes a variance to allow a 6 foot solid wall along a side property line. '!he fence would be setback 40 feet from the street and will extend south 64 feet; the top of the wall will be 107 feet and the ground at the base will be 101 feet. '!he very south end of the wall will be . approximately 11 feet high. '!he Planner reviewed the findings listed in his report and stated a City trail is located immediately east of the applicants property. '!he proposed pool in the rear yard of the proposed house would be exposed to trail users without a solid fence. Bergly stated the applicant feels that privacy from the trail is linportant and neither a 42" wall or a 30 percent open fence allowed up to 6 feet high would provide the desired privacy. '!he applicant also feels the trail is an amenity but would like privacy, tea. ]3ergly indicated the land use east of the trail is higher density residential and a buffer between single family and higher densities is considered appropriate. '!he usable site area on the lot is limited due to the sloping rear yard and full utilization of the upper portion is proposed. '!he Planner also indicated the nearest townhomes are approximately 150 feet east of the trail easement and will not be irrpacted by the solid fence. Neither air circulation or light as specified in the Ordinance provision requiring 30 percent openness in a fence are issues due to proximity. Planner Bergly explained the trail easement is 35 feet wide and will provide ample space for air circulation and the 64 foot long wall does not irrpact a portion of the trail. '!he wetland on the south end of the lot will not be affected by the wall. '!he Planner concluded to reconune.nd approval of the variance and stated 3 reasons why it is appropriate: . - .- , . Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Planning ccmnission Meeting, 6-03-92 Page 10 . C1lSE #92-08: 1. The views from the City trail is the factor the applicant is seeking to minimize and directly irrpact this property. 2. '!he provisions in the Ordinance regarding both height and openness of fences do not allow an effective screen for allowing privacy in the pool and terrace area. 3. '!he elevations of the lot do not allow flexibility of placing the pool = terrace so they would not be irrpacted by trail users. Member winiecki expressed her concern of placing a wall near a park trail would promote violence and would take away from the openness of the trail system. Mr. Dlugosch stated three reasons why he needs the wall: privacy, safety and security, and architectural consistency. '!here was discussion regarding further proposed landscaping, placement of the pool in another area on his lot, fencing around the pool, and if his fence would provide 30 percent requirement for air and lighting. Peterson moved, seconded by winiecki that Commission recarrrrnend to Council denial of Case #92-08, Variance to allow a 6 foot fenced wall in a residential side yard. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) C1lSE #92-10: SIDE YARD VARIANCE. 3465 SIEMS aJURT. DUNN (SHORE OWNER): . Planner Bergly reviewed his report dated 6-03-92, relating to a side yard variance of 3 feet for an attached garage, 3465 siems Court, Donald Shore. Bergly stated the applicant proposed a variance to allow a single car garage to be expanded to a two car garage that will require a 3-foot side yard variance on the north side of the house. '!he existing garage is 15 feet 2 inches from the lot line and with the proposed extension of 8 feet 2 inches, the remaining side -yard would be 7 feet. A 10 foot side yard is required. No elevation drawings or floor plans at this time. '!he Planner reviewed the findings and noted the following: 1. The neighborhood was developed prior to present zoning standards and most homes on this segment of siems Court do not conform to present standards. '!he placement of the home in the center of the lot does not allow a two- car garage without a variance. 2. '!he present one car garage does not meet conterrq:>orary development needs where two and three car garages are now the standard. Only this house and the one directly a=oss the street now have single car garages along this segment of siems Court. 3. The garage on the lot directly north of and adjacent this parcel is 6.5 feet from the lot line from which the proposed variance is requested. '!his home and the Donald Shore home have approximately the same front yard set back. '!his neighboring garage was constructed in 1956, two years . after the home was milt. < . Minutes of the 1\rden Hills Regular planninq ccmnission Meeting, 6-03-92 . Page 11 Cl\SE #92-10 (a:Nl"D): 4. '!he neighboring garage and the prop:JSed garage will be separated by 13.5 feet between them. '!his is the best relationship if reduced side yards are necessary as both properties will have similar :impacts on each other. No site views will be affected. 5. '!he neighbor has experienced minor erosion to.V<rrd the rear of her garage along the property line. '!he problem would be lessened by reversing the flow in the gutter and downspout on the Donald Shore property. It now drains on the front =mer of the garage. 6. '!he roof line on the Shore home does not lend itself to a siJnple extension of the main gable. '!he =ncern is that if the variance is allowed, the additional should be conpatible with the architecture of the existing home. Bergly concluded by stating the ordinance allows variances where ".. . site factor. . . prohibit reasonable development equivalent to that which would be permitted without variance on a similar size lot located in the same district, but which lot has not unusual =nfiguration. II In the case presented, the unusual factor is not the size of the lot related to other nearby lots, but is the placement of the existing house on the lot. "Equivalent" use relates to the fact that only this and one other lot on this cul-de-sac have only single car garages . with no method of =eating one without a variance or by razing the existing house and =nstructing a new one that meets today I S regulations. '!he Planner reconnnended his approval of the variance with the following stipulations: 1. '!he applicant satisfactorily addresses the drainage issue discussed in Finding #4 above, and 2. '!he applicant bring the building plans and elevations back to the Planning Commission for review and approval. -Mr. Bergly also reconnnended attaching a stipulation that the new property owner be required to sultnit building plans for Commission review and approval. '!here was discussion of concerns relating to granting a variance to the sellor of the property with no building plans sultnitted. Edckson moved, seconded by Carlson, that Commission reconnnend to Council approval of Case #92-10, Side yard variance of 3 feet for an attached garage, with the conditions that the building plans for the addition to the garage be reviewed and approved by Planning Commission. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) Cl\SE #92-09: SITE PLAN REVIEW. 4155 ~ AVE. N.. FOSTER: Chair Probst explained the Commission has been in the prooess of reviewing and . revising the Zoning Code Ordinance and suggested the Commission table action on this item until such time as the review is completed. , . . . Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Planning ocmnission Meeting, 6-03-92 Page 12 . ClISE #92-09 CCUfi" D) : Carlson moved, seconded by Winiecki, to re=mmend that action on Case #92-09, site Plan Review, What-a-Racquet Sports Courts, Dennis Foster, be tabled until the Zoning Ordinance has been adopted by the city Council. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) Mr. Foster reviewed the history of his atterrq:>t to secure a site Plan Review and felt it is unfair the Commission table his item since he has =mplied with all the regulations and requests. He further stated he would be willing to review the proposed ordinance regulations and atterrq:>t to =mply with the new regulations. Planner Bergly suggested Commission re=mmend that Council consider inp:>sing a- moratoritnn on development until the review of the Zoning Ordinance has been =mpleted and adopted., with exclusions for permits on existing buildings or items that =mply with the recommended changes to the code. Carlson moved, seconded by Winiecki, to re=mmend that Council consider inp:>sing a developnent moratoritnn, and request the City Attorney prepare the appropriate documentation. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) DISCUSSICIiI': 0l'HER PLl\NNIN3 ISSUES: Commission con=ed to begin the July 1 Planning Meeting at 6:30 p.m. to . accorrnnodate discussion of the Draft Zoning Ordinance amendments prior to regular business items. ~ REPORT: Council Liaison Mahowald report on items of interest to the Cornmission. 1\DJOURN: Carlson moved, seconded by Winiecki, that the meeting be adjourned at 10:40 p.m. Chair Dennis Probst . BRAUSEN ENTERPRISES, INC. TED BRA US EN CHERYL BRAUSEN 2170 N. DALE ST. · ROSEVILLE, MN 55113 · 612-487-2502 JUNE 3, 1992 City Council of Ard~n Hills 1450 W~st Highway 96 Ard~n Hills, Mn 55112 To Whom it May Conc~rn, At this tim~ I would lik~ to r~qu~st the council to d~f~r action on cas~ number 92-06, th~ am~nd~d special us~ p~rmit for Ard~n Hills Amoco, 1306 w. Co. Rd. E, Ard~n Hills, Mn. I would greatly appr~ciat~ if this could b~ d~ferred to th~ July 13th r~gular council meeting, as I am meeting with city staff to discuss other options for this ~xpansion. I would also 1ik~ to r~qu~st that th~ planning commission r~consid~r the application at th~ July 1st m~~ting. Sincerel y, ~~~ cc: Mayor of Ard~n Hills - TSB/bam . RECEIVED JUN 0 5 1992 " ~ , CITY OF ARDEN HILLS . MEHlRANDUM DM'E: June 4, 1992 TO: Mayor and City Council FRCH@ Terry Post, TEIIlporary City Aooountant SUBJECT: May 19~2 Financial Results Enclosed are financial infonnation schedules for the month ended May 31, 1992. In addition to these schedules, two more (Management overview/ Commentary and statement of Cash Receipts, Expenditures, and Balances) will be made available to you prior to the 6/8/92 Council meeting. Please bear with me as I atterrq:>t to standardize a financial reporting package that will be timely, infonnative, and useful for Council purposes. This month I s reporting package consists of the following: 1. Management OVerview /Conunentary . 2. Financial SUnnnary (All Funds) 3. General Fund (101) Budget SUnnnary 4. Budget SUnnnary (All Funds) 5. Investment Portfolio Analysis 6. statement of Cash Receipts, Expenditures, and Balances. I will be in attendance at the June 8, 1992 Council meeting and will respond to any questions you may have on the above materials. TP:rk - . /' CITY OF ARDEN HILLS t- FINANCIAL SUMMARY (ALL FUNDS) MAY 1992 . t9~~i BGOROT INC(p~C) YEAR TO DATE'" t@9~At.JN .........8MfB. ActUAl- PREV"Y:R SUPGEt1991.ACT REVENUE - 101 TAXES 34,933 27,454 37,891 27,454 1.38 1,432,582 5.4% LICENSES & PERMITS 13,808 10,092 59,536 50,250 18.5% 123,331 -23.4% INTERGOVERNM ENTAL 1 0,444 11,899 12,829 32,862 -61.0% 118,170 -26.7% CHARGES & FINES 4,737 7,488 7,207 17,087 -57.8% 69,000 26.4% OTHER 790 1,432 2,225 9,735 -77.1% 112,605 53.9% OPERATING TRANSFERS IN 117 0 234 117 100.0% 0 -100,0% !iilii'illiilil!lmlffl!;~!;ti!9g~mlllll'i!llil~j~?~'li.!I~j,?~$i'.:!I~~;~j~??ili1~Kj$Q$'i!I!!1?;~!!1:1j~~;~~~1 REVENUE ALL FUNDS 101 64,829 58,365 119,922 137,505 -12.8% 1,855,688 -1.8% PARKS (224, 226, 227) 14,333 35,220 71,531 91,938 -22.2% 201,064 -11.0% SERVICES (225, 228) 5,489 1,948 24,435 28,312 -13,7% 119,100 0.4% CAPITAL PROJECTS 46,658 18,896 85,818 78,460 9.4% 809,281 -28,5% WATER (601) 124,033 1,407 261,953 140,937 85.9% 638,555 5.8% SEWER (602) 66,055 177,620 242,493 387,184 -37.4% 629,950 -3.6% YCLlNG (603) 18,920 0 18,920 0 0.0% 78,354 100.0% 11111!'I!I!ffiQm~\ii~~gti!9~$jll'llIll!II~~~1ylll!g;1!$~III~g~;9!tglllll~i??~ II~i~lj~~gll!IIIII#~!~Wl EXPENDITURE - 101: GENERAL GOVERNMENT 33,045 42,955 203,424 228,360 -10.9% 491,771 -9.1% POLICE 78,726 57,558 208,542 179,805 16.0% 478,507 5.9% FIRE 0 506 88,818 110,506 -19.6% 291,650 -1.2% PUBLIC WORKS 13,320 15,203 55,497 91,255 -39.2% 333,296 -16.5% PARKS & RECREATION 13,771 14,409 68,420 64,704 5.7% 229,217 1.8% OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT 0 0 0 474 -100,0% 0 -100,0% !!llillljI1~ItI:g,~s6g!mB~lj:.:i!!'lII!III~~j~~g!1Ii1~~!~?JIIIII!('ii!g~iYq,illl!I~K~j'PIt.:.Il!I,t,f#~Wl:!(t,\J!g~l\l,!!1111('IIIIF!l.!~Wl EXPENDITURES - ALL FUNDS: 101 138,862 130,631 624,703 675,104 -7.5% 1,824,441 -6.3% PARKS (224, 226, 227) 15,356 16,506 39,266 41,504 -5.4% 194,774 -14.9% SERVICES (225, 228) 10,665 387 12,084 12,729 -5.1% 103,850 4.5% CAPITAL PROJECTS 24,923 34,539 22,596 44,973 -49.8% 701,091 9.6% WATER (601) 29,187 88,903 202,133 230,768 -12.4% 748,690 12.6% SEWER (602) 63,576 53,047 353,223 304,212 16.1% 870,528 10.5% RECYCLING (603) 10,691 0 19,755 0 0,0% 77 ,656 100.0% ~1!1'@m~y!~ft~g!mJ;!B~~!I.(IIIII2lJ3!2~d!I!II!g2~1(j1~(11!;ltgii~\!t6dll!I'j;3tl9129dIIIIIRg!~~',.14j52I'!b3~1;1;1!IIIIII3!5~ ET SURPLUS (DEFICIENCY) 47,056 (30,557) (448,688) (444,949) 0.8% (189,038) Updated 6-05-92 -- ~ CITY OF ARDEN HILLS GENERAL FUND (101) BUDGET SuMMARY MAY 1992 REVENUE -...-------------------------------------------------------------- --------- SOURCE BUDGET CURRENT MONTH YR TO DATE BALANCE % TO DATE ---------------- ------------- ------------- ---------- ---------- --------- TAXES 1,432,582 34,933 37,891 1,394,691 3% LICENSES 123,331 13,808 59,536 63,795 48% INTERGOV. REV 118,170 10,444 12,829 105,341 11% CHGS FOR SERVo 38,700 1,980 7,548 31,152 20% FINES & FORF. 26,000 2,757 (341) 26,341 -1% MISC. REC. 56,030 790 2,225 53,805 4% INTEREST 4,300 0 0 4,300 0% INTERAL REVENUE 25,146 0 0 25,146 0% TRANSFERS 3,1,429 117 234 31,195 1% ------------- ------------- ---------- ---------- --------- TOTAL REVENUE 1,855,688 64,829 119,922 1,735,766 6% ----------------------------------------------------------- EXPENDITURES ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT BUDGET CURRENT MONTH YR TO DATE BALANCE % TO DATE* ---------------- ------------- ------------- ---------- ---------- --------- MAYOR & COUNCIL 42,873 2,201 21,658 21,215 51% MUNICIPAL 36,200 2,949 11,290 24,910 31% EWTIONS 11,215 265 4,199 7,016 37% ADMIN OFFICE 252,472 15,938 125,724 126,748 50% LEGAL 20,350 1,465 6,598 13,752 32% PLAN & ZONING 30,935 3,388 13,543 17,392 44% GOVT. BLDGS 48,704 3,630 14, 469 34,235 30% HUMAN RGTS. 200 0 50 150 25% PROTo INSPECT. 48,822 3,209 5,893 42,929 12% POLICE PF.OT. I 478,507 I 78,726 I 208,543 I 269,964 I 44% FIRE PROTo 291,650 0 88,818 202,832 30% PW STREETS 315,064 12,610 40,323 274,741 13% PW STORM SEWERS 18,232 5,709 15,161 3,071 83% PW RECYCLING 0 (4,999) 13 ' (13) SUMMER PLAYGRND 12,768 0 267 12,501 2% SKATING RINKS 42,627 1,789 19,745 22,882 46% PARK MTNCE. 173,822 11,982 48,408 125,414 28% TRANSFER TO 226 0 0 0 0 TRANSFER TO 408 0 0 0 0 ------------- ------------- ---------- ---------- --------- TOTAL EXP. 1,824,441 138,862 624,703 1,199,738 34% . ----------------------------------------------------------- REVENUE LESS $31,247 ($74,033) ($504,781) $536,028 EXPENDITURES ================================================== * IF EXPENDITURES OCCURED EVENLY THROUGHOUT THE YEAR, THE MAY YTD WOULD BE 42% 4- 7~--1~-~~~-~~-~~~-~~~-~~-~-~-~'~ I ()of- t....~ 0"11"')..0 Ol..., 000 000 C'lO c;;J ..0 0 I r--. I_~l~ ~O~ 0"1 ~ ~ ~ l~ jru~l ~~ _ ~ I (/'. I 0"' t I W I 0;:. I J ~IO~1 I ~J~~l l ~T--T:-~~~-;~-~~~-~~~-~;-~-~-~T~ ~i_ l~ ~~= g: ~gj 8~ r:e;:;:; l~ . ><ICT>QI... _..... _...._ .. _... I- WI~I-I~ _~~ N ~~ ~ 0 ~ l~ I_>I~ M _ ~ __ M 0 10 I 1 I"CJ CU M 1 J'O"J ill ... I 1 I.... ------------------------------- 1--'~-~~~-~~-~~~-~---~~-~-~-~1~ : ~l~ ~re..o ~ 000 01: ~ ~ ~ ~lre : &!;S : : I : J f7' I 1 I __ CI I 1 , I- I J l ~. I I ------------------------------ , , IW l~ ~~CU 2~ ~~~ 000 ~O ~ ~ -10 IZu....lfJ C'-i?l 6oJ:J ':'tJo<r__ C, Ml'-- Ii'J 0 0 r- ~z~lr-:. If'l..--a'..._ _1"--_ O_t;r\_~"": o:r;;n... If'l_ ~ ~l~. i _ .;;r I",... I""J::8 IJJ <.D \("l .:'0.1 0'1...c 0 (,\J...o...o,....,..... I r- l~~l~ .... If'l ~ ~~N -- ~ ~ ~ If'll~ I W lXl I ... I ... (J"l I a:. I.... I f""J lli ----__________________________ 0:;. I I I ~: l~ ~~~ O~ COO 000 ~g ~ M ~I$ ~:~Ql~ ~~~. ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~I~ Zl~~'~ ~MM ~ ~ ~ M ~ M :5:::->1& M -- (lJ ~ ~ --l~ >< I I , ... u.... 1 I I __ ------------------------------ , , , I 1M ~l.O<..O Olf'l 0000 C.OO Me ,..... l..O ~''''''' 1!z:cI::8 $::n~ ~ g~ ~ rn ~:::e 'UJ~I'" _... _ _ ....... ...1... l~ I~ N~ 0 ~ M OIM lO;.. lj.....~ __ __ ~'U gj <.,CI -1l7t ! =::. I...... I ('U 1 U I I , , , ------------------------------ , , , , ,- ~~~ 90 ~~~ 000 88 0 ~ ~ 0 , ~I~ ~~~ ~~ ~~_ 0 ~ ~ ~IM (', i~ 'l~ ....~~_ :~ o__~"":. ~-: ~ ... ...10 .:=. 10-: I..,. ...oenco 0..0....... evO"oI..O 00 Ln""" co 0 ,.....,_ ~ l--;Zl~ __u""J ~- <<>z;:o~"V -- ~ ..q- r--. r--.. m erG:: : I_ - r r- c:o I_ -J I l_ 14' ~~ ------------------------------- - ~ "'so z -______________________________ w> I l~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~I~ c~~ I ~!...o ~ru ~_ or-- o~o 1..00 _ c:o ..,. en . l1.iEO"" ,..-, ..,.. ('\.II I ..... _ oW M ~"\Jl...... c:~~ l~~: I I ~~> l~cl I cr: 'i-- 1 I >~E I I 1 I- L.u I 'a<<. I I ~8 7--7-------------------------7- ~ t~ l~ ~~r- ruM ~~M ~~~ ~..,. ~ ,..... ~IO m '~;I~ ~I.n_ -n ...o""~ ~N _...... 0 ~ MI~ 1_ ,~ ~~..,. MM ~cnM ~_ _~ ...0 ..,. ~Icn 121_ ........_...._ ___...... _.......... _I... 1_ \~ ,.....cn~ .....M ~<..O~ O~ ..,.~ l..O ~ cnl~ ~~~lr--.. ...0 ~ ~M ~~N - ~~ ~ ~ I.nl~ I W IXl I 1 .... '~_~=__----------------------~~ I r _ _ __ _ I , '&! ~-i}l $M O~~ oc:o~ Ln-<f" M M ~'~ ~' r 0..,. lI'1 ...oC:OM M~-u <:0_ Lrl Ch I~ l~ 1 ~M N _~_ ~~ ~- ~ -<f" 0- I cr.a:=t r... ..........__ ..._ ......._ _ ......... ~ICl"'I-Ir:;h 00 ~ _ -4"'....... (\.I ~l~ 1_>1_ ~~ ru....... ~ ~ ~ _I I I....... ru ~ I - a. I I 1 I--t---~---------------------.- I 1[j'I O-"MCO.q-i.i:1 018'0 00.0...00 M tf') 01....... 'I- '0' 0 0 ~ ~ _ ~ .,,,, In "",_ IZ~I~ _.......Lrl ~ ~ 0 0 ~IM 1~21~ OM ~ M ~; ~ ~:o :t;t::i!lt..O -- -4'" ru "" -l~ fB I ....... 1M , , , 1--7-------------------------.- I I-i~ ~g::8 08 ~~~ 880 ~~ ~ ~ ~:~ 1C\.:~r;:O r--..co...,. 8_ ~r-(1J..cr~ <$?i;i ~ Oi M,Q-; I~Q[~ ~~M ~M ~~~ o~ ~~ ~ ~ ~l_ l-~[~ =r- ~~ co~~ - ~w ~ ~ r-l~ 1 I.... I ... ~--~=------------------------~~ , ~~'" - 1 Q q:l(f,lo 1 , il< ~ !.;! ~ I u: 1-. 25!!l . I .i!i El:t~ -'i- ..I!j2 I ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ '0 0 ~_ ~~~ ~ _ ~ l~ ~~o ~~ ~~~ !j2~~ i~ ~ '~ I-E~ _I- ~~ 51--' _w - , ~U: i -'~ ~ ~ I a: w a: ~ a~1- ....... Q:, IX. Ot '':!! !;\jSl1'" ..... -.1- u__ E. W ~ >,a! . ItIS ~l5tO: 00 Q:;Oa:;: ::z:xff: Q:::> I- ~ wll- i---~~--~_~~~_~~~_~~_~___~_~ , , 1_ ~~....... \1J~ ~~o C:O[j'lO -~ - ~ "" 10 ru ru O_N 00_ <::> Ot 1_ ~ru~ ~ ru ~MM ~.q-_ ~ $ ""I S cITY OF ARDEN ~ILLS INVESTMENT PORTFOLl 0 i)5/J1/9~ B~E PURCHASE MATURITY TERM TYPE INVESTMENT INVESTMENT CATEGORY COST ANNUALIZED YIELD MARKET VALUE DATE DATE I DAYS) GOAL TOTAL ~ < IF APPLJCABLE PV FD 05/31/92 (\6101/52 I MM PRIME VALUE MONEY MARKET $3\3,488.19 3.71' $11,630.41 4M FD 05/31/52 06/01/92 I MM 4M MONEY MARKET $201,9110.76 3.71, <7,492.M SHEARSON 05/31/92 06101/92 1 MM SHEARSON LEHMAN MONEY MKT $110,157.82 3.67, $4,044.26 PIPER OSlO 1/52 05/31/52 30 MM P I PER JAFFRAY MONEY MARKET $I,OIB.74 3.25': $33. j 1 SUB-TOTAL MONEY MARKET 15, 15'1< $626,645.51 3.70, $23,195.78 4M FUND 12123/91 06/22/92 182 CD HOME SI'GS OF AMERICA/CA $100,000.00 4.80% $4,800.00 4 M FUND 08/07/90 08/06/52 2 YR CD Standard Pacific Savin9s, F.A. $100,000.00 8.25% 1!i8,250. (10 4 M FUND 08/071'3<1 08/06/52 2 YR CD First Federal Savings Bank $100,000.00 8.10% <8,100.(.(1 4 H FUND 08/28/90 08/27/92 2 YR CD Sreat Western Bank $100,000.00 8.10, $8,100.((1 4 M FUND 1l/14/51 11/13/92 1 YR CD COlONIAL NAT'L BK/DE '100,000.00 5.~,~ $o5! 650.00 SHEARSON 12/10/90 12/10/92 2 YR CD Chase Mar,hattan Bank, N. A. '90,000.00 7. 95~ $7,155.00 4M FUND 12/23/91 12/22/92 1 YR CD PACIFIC BANK/CA $100,000.00 5.00~ $5,000.00 4M FUND 12/23/91 06/23/93 1.5YR CO YORK FEDL S & L/PA 0100,000.00 5.15~ $5,150.00 4M FUND 12/23/'31 06/23/93 1.5YR CD UNION FEDL SVGS BANK/IN $100,000.00 5.15:k 1;5,150.00 4M mm 12/23/91 06/23/53 1.5YR CD 1ST DEPOSIT NATL BK/NH $IM,OOO.OO 5.00~ $5,000. ((I 4 M FUND 08/OB/51 08/09/53 2 YR CD SaoraMento S & L $100,000.00 7.10% $7,10(1.(.(1 SHEARSON 09/10/90 09/10/53 3 YR CD Amer. Security N.A. $90,000.00 8.45% $7,605.00 SHfARSON 09/10/90 09/10/53 3 YR CD MBNA AMerioa Bank N.A. $90,00(1.(10 B.45:t. $7,605.00 SHEARSlJ!4 10/22/90 10/22/93 3 YR CD Maryland Nat'l Bank $90,000.00 8.45~ $7,605.00 S~rI 11/13/9(1 11/13/53 3 YR CD Bank of Ne. York $90,00(>.00 8.0(1% '1,20(1.00 SH 11/13/90 11/13/53 3 YR CD Bank of Ne. York/Dela.ar. $90,000.00 8.00~ $7,200.00 4 M 0 11/14/91 11/15/33 2 YR CD COlUMBIA S t LlCO $100,000. (10 6.10% $6,100.00 SHfARSON 12/03/90 11/26/93 3 YR CD Boston Safe Dep. & Trust $50,000.00 B.OO% $7,200.00 SHfARSIJN 12/24/90 12/24/53 3 YR CD FCC National Bank $50,000.00 7.7M $6,930.00 4 M FUND 10/11/91 10/10/54 3 YR CD HOUSEHOLD BANK OF CAL. $roo, 00(1. 00 6.45% $6f 450. 00 4M FUND 12/23/91 12/23/54 3 YR CD HEART FEDL S t L/CA $100,000.00 6.15~ '6,150.00 4M FUND 12/23/91 12/26/95 4 YR CD HAWTHORNE S & L/CA 0100,000.00 6.35~ $6,350.00 4M FUND 12/23/51 12/26/55 4 YR CD 1ST COIIMONWEAL TH BI</VA $100,000.00 6.25% $6,250.00 SHEARSON 05/03/91 05/03/96 5 YR CD Continental Bank, NA 90,000.00 7.30~ $61570. (1(1 4 M FUND 12/l1J91 12/10/56 5 YR CD FIRST USA BANK/DELAWARE $100,000.00 6. 70~ $6,700.00 SUB-TOTAL FIXED RATE INSTRUMENT 5O~ 571. '2,410,000.00 6.8&% $165,370.00 PIPER 05/01152 05/31/92 30 MU PIPER JAFFRAY 1NSTJT GOVT 15~ 13): $534,146.51 lO.22~ $54,572.5l PIPER 01/10/92 11/15/95 4 YR AG US T-STRIPS $199,305.05 5.45~ $10,862.13 SHfARSON 08/15/51 04/15/56 5 YR AS ZERO COUPON $142,18B.00 7.45% $JO,587.32 PIPER 01/10/92 05/15/56 4.5YR AG US T-STRIPS $99,757.76 5.82'~ $5, B08. 23 SHEARSON 08/15/91 07/15/56 5 YR AS ZERO COUPON i139,192.00 7.51' 010,454.71 SHfARSON 03127152 04/15/97 5 YR AG ZERO COUPON ~52,876.02 7.04~ $3,722.47 SUB-TOTAL ZEROS 20% 15% $633,358.83 6.54~ $41,434.86 TOTAL INVESTMENTS 100~ 1()(r,( $4,204,150.85 $284,577. 15 . OVERALL ANNUALIZED RATE OF RETURN 6.77% ANNUAlIZED RATE OF RETURN WIO MONEY MARKET 7.31~ . CITY OF ARDEN HILLS MEKm>NOOM DM'E: June 4, 1992 TO: Mayor and city Council FRCH: Dan Winkel, Public works SUperintendent d,w SUBJECT: Resignation Notice fran Maureen Winkel I have received a resignation letter from Maureen Winkel in regards to the Building Maintenance position. '!he letter stated that her resignation would take effect June 1, 1992. Maureen has done an - excellent job for the City during the past number of years. I was a little disheartened to recently find out that Maureen has not received a salary increase over the last three years. '!he former Administrator had indicated he would propose an increase for the part time help, but apparently did not do so in the 1992 Budget. Maureen currently earns $6.93 per hour. . I would like to keep Maureen in the city Hall maintenance position, and perhaps if offered an in=ease, she may consider staying in the position. I would recommend the position be paid $9.00 to $9.25 per hour for the duties perfonned. REl:X:.WIDIDATION: In view of the fact that Maureen has been very conscience about her job, and with the Council's approval, I would request authorization to offer Maureen $9. 00 per hour to see if she would be interested in continuing in this position. If the Council determines it is not appropriate at this time, then I will begin searching for a new person :i111mediately. ACI'ION RIDUIRED: If the Council agrees with the staff recommendation, I will atterrq:>t to negotiate wages with Maureen for $9.00 per hour. If the Council does not authorize an in=ease at this time, I will begin searching for a replacement person and offer the current salary. CW:rk .