Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCCP 11-09-1992 ~ j.....-;' ll:cr;~ *REVISED* l/ AGENDA - ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS MONDAY, NOVEl\IBER 9,1992,7:30 P.M. I I .l. CALL TO ORDERJROLL CALL 7:30 P,M, 2, AGENDA ADOPTION ~ ~ ""iN ~t)"" 3, APPROVAL OF OcroBER 26 ~ECIAL MEETING OF NOVEMBER,U 4, CONSENT CALENDAR a, Adopt Res, No, 92-68 Relating to Apportionment of Assessments Relating to Improvement No, SS-W-89-1 (Cleveland Avenue Lift Station) b, Pay Estimate No, 1 (Final) Cold In-Place Recycling Improvement as Approved by the City Engineer, c, Pay Estimate No, 4 (Final) 1992 Tiller Lane Street Improvements as Approved by the City Engineer, d, Adopt Res, No, 92-69 Authorizing Application for Recycling Grant Funds for 1993, e, Approve List of ClaimslPayroll, . 5, PUBLIC COMMENTS 6, UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS A. Planninl! Commission Items: 1) Case No, 92-17; Rezoning and Planned Unit Development for "Cottage Villas of Arden Hills" on Cleveland Avenue, John Arkell, Developer, 2) Case No, 92-19; Waiver of Development Moratorium Ordinance to Allow, an Accessory Building Allowed in the Existing Ordinance, Owen Rasmussen, 2020 Thorn Drive, 3) Case No, 92-20; Side Yard Variance for Expansion of Residence at 1727 Chatham Avenue, Rick and Sherilyn Hanson, B. T,H, 51 Median Closing - Request for Alternatives, C. Discussion - Referendum #1 Election Results for the Bonding of Public Works Facility, 7, COUNCIL COMMENTS 8, ADJOURN NOVEMBER MEETINGS DECEMBER MEETINGS November 11- HOLIDAY-VETERANS December 2 - Planning Comm, 7:30 Pm November 16- Worksession, 5:00 pm December 14- Council Mtg, 7:30 pm - November 18- Finance, 7:30 pm December 16- Finance Comm, 7:30 pm November 19- Public Saf/Wks, 7:30 pm December 17- Public Saf/Wks, 7:30 pm November 24- Parks & Rec, 7:30 pm December 24- 112 DAY HOLIDA Y-C,EVE -,_. November 26-27 HOLIDAY-THKSGVG, December 25- HOLIDAY-CHRISTMAS November 30- Council Mtg, 7:30 pm December 28- Council Mtg, 7:30 pm *REVISED* AGENDA . ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS MONDAY, NOVEMBER 9, 1992, 7:30 P.M. 1, CALL TO ORDERJROLL CALL 7:30 P,M, 2, AGENDA ADOPTION Nf'V'-'J'd \ 3, APPROVAL OF OCfOBER 26 AND E=IAL MEETING OF NOVEMBER) 4, CONSENT CALENDAR a, Adopt Res, No, 92-68 Relating to Apportionment of Assessments Relating to Improvement No, SS-W-89-1 (Cleveland Avenue Lift Station) b, Pay Estimate No, 1 (Final) Cold In-Place Recycling Improvement as Approved by the City Engineer, c, Pay Estimate No, 4 (Final) 1992 Tiller Lane Street Improvements as Approved by the City Engineer, d, Adopt Res, No, 92-69 Authorizing Application for Recycling Grant Funds for 1993, e. Approve List of Claims/Payroll, . 5, PUBLIC COMMENTS 6, UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS A. Plannint! Commission Items: 1) Case No, 92-17; Rezoning and Planned Unit Development for "Cottage Villas of Arden Hills" on Cleveland Avenue, John Arkell, Developer. 2) Case No, 92-19; Waiver of Development Moratorium Ordinance to Allow , an Accessory Building Allowed in the Existing Ordinance, Owen Rasmussen, 2020 Thorn Drive, 3) Case No, 92-20; Side Yard Variance for Expansion of Residence at 1727 Chatham Avenue, Rick and Sherilyn Hanson, B. T,H, 51 Median Closing - Request for Alternatives, C. Discussion - Referendum #1 Election Results for the Bonding of Public Works Facility, 7, COUNCIL COMMENTS 8, ADJOURN NOVEMBER MEETINGS DECEMBER MEETINGS November 11- HOLIDAY.VETERANS December 2 - Planning Comm, 7:30 Pm November 16- Worksession, 5:00 pm December 14- Council Mtg, 7:30 pm . November 18- Finance, 7:30 pm December 16- Finance Comm, 7:30 pm November 19- Public Saf/Wks, 7:30 pm December 17- Public Saf/Wks, 7:30 pm November 24- Parks & Rec, 7:30 pm December 24. 1/2 DAY HOLIDA Y-C,EVE November 26-27 HOLIDA Y-THKSGVG, December 25- HOLIDAY -CHRIS1MAS November 30- Council Mtg, 7:30 pm December 28- Council Mtg, 7:30 pm "'REVISED'" ~ AGENDA . ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS MONDAY, NOVEMBER 9, 1992, 7:30 P.M. 1, CALL TO ORDERlROLL CALL 7:30 P,M, 2, AGENDA ADOPTION 3. ~.. .1 ~r 9ffIeL ~ .1.. K. 5~r" 111111 -. L_.. y 4, APPROVAL OF OcrOBER 26 COUNCIL MINUTES "f- ///4}Z ~~l/~ , -'''-'''-"-'~'-'~-----:--:::::..~ 5, CONSENT CALENDAR a, Adopt Res, No, 92-68 Relating to Apportionment of Assessments Relating to Improvement No, SS-W-89-1 (Cleveland Avenue Lift Station) b, Pay Estimate No, 1 (Final) Cold In-Place Recycling Improvement as Approved by the City Engineer, c, Pay Estimate No, 4 (Final) 1992 Tiller Lane Street Improvements as Approved by the City Engineer, d, Approve List of Claims/payroll, . 6. PUBLIC COMMENTS 7, UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS A. Planninl!: Commission Items: 1) Case No, 92-17; Rezoning and Planned Unit Development for "Cottage Villas of Arden Hills" on Cleveland Avenue, John Arkell, Developer, 2) Case No, 92-19; Waiver of Development Moratorium Ordinance to Allow an Accessory Building Allowed in the Existing Ordinance, Owen Rasmussen, 2020 Thorn Drive, 3) Case No, 92-20; Side Yard Variance for Expansion of Residence at 1727 Chatham Avenue, Rick and Sherilyn Hanson, B, T,H, 51 Median Closing - Request for Alternatives, C, Discussion - Referendum #1 Election Results for the Bonding of Public Works Facility, 8, COUNCIL COMMENTS 9, ADJOURN NOVEMBER MEETINGS DECEMBER MEETINGS November 11- HOLIDAY-VETERANS December 2 - Planning Comm, 7:30 Pm November 16- Worksession, 5:00 pm December 14- Council Mtg, 7:30 pm . November 18- Finance, 7:30 pm December 16- Finance Comm, 7:30 pm November 19- Public Saf/Wks, 7:30 pm December 17- Public Saf/Wks, 7:30 pm November 24- Parks & Rec, 7:30 pm December 24- 112 DAY HOLIDAY.C,EVE ~. N'ov.el!llJ~LZ~,:17HOL!DAY-THKSGVG, December 25- HOLIDAY-CHRISTMAS .~ November 30- councnMtw'~ December 28- Council Mtg, 7:30 pm . (lOt). --,".- ,,-,,-"'''.''''*'''' ~.~ " {'ii--/! . , . ....(. '{Ll~, AGENDA l ;., ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEETING . COUNCIL CHAMBERS MONDAY, NOVEMBER 9, 1992, 7:30 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDERlROLL CALL 7:30 P,M, 2, AGENDA ADOPTION 3, APPROVAL OP OcrOBER 26 COUNCIL MINUTES 4, CONSENT CALENDAR a, Adopt Res, No, 92-68 Relating to Apportionment of Assessments Relating to Improvement No, SS-W-89-1 (Cleveland Avenue Lift Station) b, Pay Estimate No, 1 (Pinal) Cold In-Place Recycling Improvement as Approved by the City Engineer, c, Pay Estimate No, 4 (Pinal) 1992 Tiller Lane Street Improvements as Approved by the City Engineer, d, Approve List of Claims/Payroll, 5. PUBLIC COMMENTS 6, UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS . A. Planning Commission Items: 1) Case No, 92-17; Rezoning and Planned Unit Development for "Cottage Villas of Arden Hills" on Cleveland Avenue, John Arkell, Developer. 2) Case No, 92-18; Waiver of Development Moratorium Ordinance to Allow an Accessory Building Allowed in the Existing Ordinance, Owen Rasmussen, 2020 Thorn Drive, 3) Case No, 92-19; Side Yard Variance for Expansion of Residence at 1727 Chatham Avenue, Rick and Sherilyn Hanson, B, T,H. 51 Median Closing - Request for Alternatives, C. Discussion - Referendum #1 Election Results for the Bonding of Public Works Facility, 7, COUNCIL COMMENTS 8, ADJOURN NOVEMBER MEETINGS DECEMBER MEETINGS November 9 - Council Mtg, 7:30 pm December 2 - Planning Comm, 7:30 pm November 11- HOLIDAY-VETERANS December 14- Council Mtg, 7:30 pm . November 16- Worksession, 5:00 p,m, December 16- Finance Comm, 7:30 pm November 19- Public Saf/Wks, 7:30 pm December 17- Public Saf/Wks, 7:30 pm . November 24- Parks & Rec, 7:30 pm December 24- 1/2 DAY HOLIDAY-C.EVE November 26-27 HOLIDA Y-THKSGVG, December 25- HOLIDAY-CHRISTMAS November 30- Council Mtg, 7:30 pm December 28- Council Mtg, 7:30 pm . . CI'fi OF ARDEJI BILIB MI!XIWIDUK TO: Mayor and City council . FRCK: Dorothy A. Person, City lldministrator IWrE: NCII/aDber 6, 1992 sus.:JECT: city 1\dministrator's IDfOJ:llBtion For couneil Meeting of 11/09/92 I. ACrION NEEDED BY CITY CXXlNCIL: Consent calendar Item No. 4.a. ~ the Resolution RelatiIq to Apportionment of Assessments Relatin:J to IIrprovement No. SS-W-89-1 (Clevelan:l. Avenue Lift station) . A resolution for apportionment of Assessments relatiIq to the Clevelan:l. Avenue List station is attached. The primary difference is that the Highway right-of-way prcperty was not included. Consent calendar Item No. 4.b. ~ the Pay Fstilnate No.1 for Cold In-Place RecycliIq IIrprovement - Contractor 1\shbach Construction, Inc. has c:arrpleted all work on Rouni Lake an:l. Dunlap street and has met =ntract specifications per city Erqineer approval. The final construction cost was c:arrpleted at approxilnately 12.6 percent below =ntract price. The Contractor is in the process of suJ:rnittiIq final insurance and wananty documentation, so that the full payment will be reduced by $1,000 until these final items . are received by the City Erqineer. Consent calendar Item No. 4.c. regardin;J Pay Fstilnate No.4 for the 1992 Tiller Lane street Improvements - All work has been c:arrpleted and paperwork finalized including the Certificate of SUl:stantial CclItpletion and Minnesota Deparbnent of Revenue Fonns. Consent calendar Item No. 6.B. regardin;J T.H. 51 Median ClosiIq Request for Alternatives - 'lhe Minnesota Deparbnent of Transportation has forwarded to the City written communication that the decision to close the median at Lydia an:l. SnelliIq Avenue cannot be revisited due to public safety issues an:l. liability exp:>sure to the state. They also indicated that alternatives can be explored and developed. A draft letter is enclosed for your review to initiate an alternative with MnOOI'. Consent calendar Item No. 6.C. regardin;J Referendum #1 - Referen::lum #1 was defeated in the General Election. 'lhe results are as follows: PRECINcr YES NO NON-VOrFS 1 349 437 70 2 650 585 165 3 542 641 238 4 836 883 97 . 'IOI'AL 2378 2546 570 (168) --- - ---- > . IlIFCIlMMICIiI FCR CXlOIiCIL Page 'IWo November 5, 1992 II. INFORMATIONAL ITElo!S: . a. utilitv Increases: NSP has informed the City of an increase in rates, interim rate of 4.75 to 6.50 percent with a request to go to 8 to 10 percent. Gas in::reases 4.5 percent to 6.5 percent on an interim basis. b. citv Hall cleanin:l Service: Quotes were received from 5 contractors for the cleanin:.J of City Hall. '!he lowest quota:i price is $30.00 per week or $129.00 per month. Previously, the cost for the cleanin:.J services performed was at $36.00 per week. 'lhese services will begin immediately with Coverall with a cuuLLctct signed for the services per specifications and agreed upon. DAP Its '. . --------------------~ 1- CITY OF ARDm HILIB . RllMSEY CXllJNrY RESOLOTICN 11). 92-68 RESOLU'l'J:CN RELATllG TO 1\PPCRTICHIENl' OF 1\SSES~ RELATllG TO IMPllO'lEMENl' 11). S8-W-89-1 (CL!.'VEI>>lD AVENUE LIFl' STATICN) 1IHEIlEl\8, the assessment roll f= lItqlrovement No. SS-W-89-1 was filed arxi certified to the County Auditor of Ramsey County on October 14, 1991, f= the purpose of including installments thereof to be rollected alo~ with real estate taxes cammencin;J in 1983; arxi 1IHEIlEl\8, since that date a rnnnber of parcel of property rontained with said assessment roll have been divided arxi ronveyed by previous property owners; arxi 1IHEIlEl\8, the County Auditor of Ramsey County requires that apportiornnent of the =iginal aSE'essment against each =iginal tract where it has later been divided, sold = ronveyed, be made by the City Council of the city of Arden Hills in order that the proper assessment can be ext:errled by the County Auditor against each parcel of property thereafter, canmencin;J with an assOC!<9l1eI1t to be =llected in the year 1992 arxi thereafter. Kllf, '1mm:FCml, BE IT RESOLVED, by the city Council of the city of Arden Hills does hereby make the followin;J apportiornnent or =iginal assessments as contained in said assessment roll of September 9, 1992, against the followin;J . described property: RESOLUI'ION NO. 92-68 Division No. 63776 NAME OF ASSESSMENT: IInprovement SS-W-89-1 DIP No. 6176 Auditor No. 6176 ORIGINAL PIN 'IDl'AL ASSESSMENI' A. 28-30-23-32-0002-3 $ 30,451. 98 B. 28-30-23-32-0003-6 8,700.57 C. 28-30-23-32-0005-2 70,847.45 RFAPPORI'IONMENI' A. 28-30-23-32-0029-8 $ 73,029.00 B. 28-30-23-32-0030-8 28,358.00 C. 28-30-23-32-0031-1 5,885.00 D. 28-30-23-32-0032-4 2,728.00 PASSED AND 1\DOPl'ED BY 'mE CITY <XiV!CIL OF THE CITY OF ARDm KILLS THIS 9TH MY OF!DYEMBER, 1992. . 'Ihamas R. Sather, May= ATI'EST: Dorothy A. Person, Clerk Administrator \ . REAPPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA DIVISION NO. DJ063776 RESOLUTION NO. 92-68 DIP NO. 6176 NAME OF ASSESSMENT Cleveland Avenue AUDITOR'S NO. 6176 Lift Station SS-W-89-1 ORIGINAL PIN NUMBER TOTAL ASSESSMENT A. 28-30-23-32-0002-3 $ 30.451.98 B. 28-30-23-32-0003-6 $ 8.700.57 C. 28-30-23-32-0005-2 $ 70.847.45 D. $ E. $ . F. $ G. $ REAPPORTIONMENT A. 28-30-23-32-0029-8 $ 73.029.00 B. 28-30-23-32-0030-8 $ 28.358.00 C. 28-30-23-32-0031-1 $ 5.885.00 D. 28-30-23-32-0032-4 $ 2.728.00 E. $ F. $ G. $ . ASSESSMT,FRM CITY OF ARDEN HILLS . RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 92-69 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR RECYCLING GRANT FUNDS FOR 1993 WHEREAS, the City of Arden Hills is eligible to apply for $19,449.00 in SCORE recycling grant funds; and WHEREAS, such funds would assist in continuing and improving the City's recycling program for 1993. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city Council of the City of Arden Hills, Minnesota, that the City Administrator be authorized to apply for such grant funds for the year 1993. ADOPTED BY THE ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL THIS 9TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1992. THOMAS R. SATHER, MAYOR ATTEST: . DOROTHY A. PERSON, CLERK ADMINISTRATOR . ,- I P CITY OF ARDEN HILlS . MEH:IU\NDllM ImTE: November 9, 1992 TO: Dorothy A. Person, City 1Idministrator FRCM: David W. Kriesel., Buildinq Tn~r stlll.:Jrer : Remodeling valuation at 1178 Benton Way On November 2, 1992, Mt'. Scott Larson, 1178 Benton Way, applied f= a Building Permit (#4644), showing an estimated value of $1,400.00. Upon review of the suJ:xnitted plans, I found the value for pennit to be $26,113.05. My review of the original wilding plans shCMed that the lower level met the re::lUirements of a story and not as a basement. This re::lUired me to value the inprovement at $31. 05 a square foot. ('!he valuation deducted the square footage cost of the basement to a story $44.98 - $13.93 = $31. 05.) This valuation was met by opposition from Mt'. Iarson. On subsequent meeting between Mt'. Larson and the City Administrator, Mt'. Larson has raised the value from $1,400.00, to $6,000.00 and finally to . $9,000.00 to include additional costs and labor. Although my valuations have been fourrl to be realistic in prior cases, I requested that Mt'. Larson obtain three separate bids form legitimate =ntractors to find a reasonable value of the construction. This again was met by opposition from Mt'. Larson and this is his reason for appearing before you. '!he valuation sheets used are provided by the state of Minnesota and the International Conference of Building Officials. '!he square footage valuations have been decreasing, causing me to use the most cu=ent and lowest square footage costs. OOK:lav . ,- " " , . CITY OF ARDEN HILLS MEMORANDUM ===== ==- DATE: November 09, 1992 TO: Dorthy Person, City Administrator FROM: David W. Kriesel, Building Official SYBJECT: Determination of Classification of Lower Level and Valuation at 1178 Benton Way =======================---------------------------------------== On November 2, 1992 I received an application for a building permit to remodel and improve the "basement" at 1178 Benton Way. My review found the Lower Level to be classified not as a base- ment but as a story, requiring a higher valuation. This resulted in a protest by the owner, Mr. Scott Larson. . After a phone call from Mike Godfrey of the Minnesota Building Codes and Standards Division, I retreived the original building plans for the building: which show the lower level to meet the reequirements of a story and not as a basement. On Thursday, November 5, 1992 I verified the elevations on the drawings to be existing at the site. The submitted plans show improvments to all areas of the lower level requiring me to revalue the entire story from a basement to a story. UBC Sec. 423. "VALUE or VALUATION of a building shall be the estimated cost to replace the building and structure in kind, based on curent replacement costs, as determined in Section 304 (a) . As a practice to provide uniformity in determining valuation, I follow the recommendations outlined in the "HANDBOOK TO THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE" published by the International Conference of Building Officials of which the City is a Class A member. "The code defines the valuation or value of the building in Chapter 4 essentially as the cost of replacing the building in kind. Also, the valuation includes work such as finish work, painting, electrical and mechanical work, etc., even though separate permits are to be obtained for the mechanical and . electrical trades. . , . . " . " In order to provide some uniformity in the determination of valuation so that there is a consistant base for the assignment of fees, the code directs the building official to determine the value of the building. To assist in obtaining uniformity, the International Conference of Building Officials publishes "Building Valuation Data" in its Building Standards magazine periodically. Thus, building officials may utilize a common base in their determination of the value of buildings." From the Building Valuation Data published in the september- OctOber, 1992 (current), issue of the magazine: " The unit costs are intended to comply with the definition of "valuation" in Section 423 of the Uniform Building Code (TM) and thus include architectural, structural, electrical, plumbing and mechanical work, except as specifically listed below. The unit costs also include contractor's profit, which should not be omitted." This method of valuation was used in the determination of value for the building permit fees at 1178 Benton Way. . . . , MDItlTES c~ . CITY OF '1'JIE ARDEN HILLS, MIlINEllOrA l'L1lNNIK; CXIIMISSIClN MEm'IH3 ~, IIJ'1DlBER 4, 1992 7:30 P.M. - CITY B1lLL . CALL TO ORDER vice Clair winiecki called the meetin;J to order at 7:30 p.m. RCl[.L CALL Present: vice Olair Jeanne Winiecki, Members Rayrnoni McGraw, s=t:t Peterson, Barbara Piotrowski, ani Dave Carlson. Absent: <l1air Dennis , Probst, Member steve Erickson, ani Council Liaison 'lhcm1as Mahowald. Also present: Planner John Bergly, Deputy Clerk Catherine rage and Recording Secretary Renee I Kaulfuss. APPROVE MINllTES Winiecki noted an Page 3 of the October 7 Planning Minutes, Case #92-17, Rezoning ani Planned Unit Deve1OJ;1l1E!l1t, Clevelani Avenue, John Arkell; the vote was not addressed. She requested the secretary add "All voted in favor. (6-0)". piotrowski 1IDVed, secorxled by McGraw, to approve the October 7, 1992, Planning Minutes as amerxled. All voted in favor. (5-0) PtlBLIC HEl\RIl!IG - CME #92-17: REZCIlIH3 AND PU\NNED tlNrl' DEVELOPMENT. CLEVELMlD . AVENUE. JaIN ARKELL vice Clair winiecki opened the continued public hearing at 7: 32 pII., and as a courtesy to the public, requested an overview of the application of Case #92-17; Rezoning ani Planned Unit Developnent, Clevelani Avenue, John Arke1l, be given by the Planner. Planner Bergly referred to his report dated November 4, 1992, and explained the Applicant is proposing to constJ:uct a 60-unit housing project an the Milton property an Clevelani Avenue. The request before the Conunission now is for approval of the entire POD procedure, Rezoning, General DevelOJ;lllE!l1t Plan, ani Final Developnent Plan. He noted the Applicant had a tight deadline to meet following the 10/7/92 meeting to sutmit plan changes for this meeting, therefore, several handouts on this matter are sutmitted by staff at the meeting this evening . Bergly reviewed the following items for consideration by the Planning Commission and noted the RaID apparently has not yet reviewed this application ani will also address the stann Water Plan: 1- stann Water Management Plan: a. A detention pond is propOsed near the entrance to the site to collect stann water which will be slowly released into the existing wetlani/water areas on the site. b. A srrall area of existing standing water is proposed to be . filled ani a similar sized area will be dredged also in the rear central area. c. Look at a positive opening in the north end to allow the water to flow ani clean the pond naturally. -.--.---- pl' .. MeetiDq 2 11-04-92 , .n'ft''''9' n.....'''S1OD . PUBLIC IIE1lRI!G - Cl\SE #92-17: REZCIIIlG AND PLl\NNED UNIT ~. CLE\1ELl\NI) AV!2IllE. JCIDlllRXELL (oonHm".,ll 2. Rerluction in Parki.n;J Requirements: '!he Applicant ~. ~ses 60 ,. garage stalls and 30 exterior spaces, and possible additional spaces could be available in the green area located on both sides of the drive. 3. '!he I.ard;cape Plan shcx.1s a good mix of trees, shrubs and planting beds for annuals and perennials. Flower beds will allow the residents to be involved in the gardening. Mr. Bergly suggests the developer consider a surfaced outdoor congregating space in one of the two =tyards. 4. Lighting: About 20 pole lighting fixtures are distributed alon;r the drives and parki.n;J areas at about 30' to 40' spacing. '!he Planner summarized the project data on page 2 of his :re~LL. Planner Bergly recclllIIIlE!lled the following actions: L '!hat the Moratorium Ordinance be waived. 2. '!hat the 9 a=e site be rezoned from R-2 to R-3 at a density of 6.5 units per a=e as allowed in the proposed Zoning Ordinance . 3. '!hat the PUD General Developnent Plan and Final Plan be approved as proposed with the following conditions: a. 'lhat a parki.n;J ratio of 1 garage space and .5 outside spaces be provided for each unit and that .5 spaces per unit (30) be approved as "proof of parki.n;J" to be . constructed at such time as the City determines that the need for such additional parki.n;J is evident. b. 'lhat the water management plan be approved by RaID, DNR and U.S. Corps of Engineers and that copies of any required pennits be filed with the city. Measures to ilrprove the water quality in the existing pon:i should be investigated in conjunction with these pennits. c. '!hat site construction plans be approved as part of the Developnent Agreement with the City. d. '!hat fire hydrants be located as required by the Fire Marshall. e. '!hat Park Dedication requirements be stipulated in the Developnent Agreement. f. 'lhat appropriate l:x:>nding for landscaping and costs associated with City review and inspection be stipulated in the Development Agreement and that an escrow a=unt be established to cover such costs. g. 'lhat the sign location shown is not approved. vice Clair winiecki asked if there were any questions or camments from the Conunission. Carlson questioned the soil stability and if any co=ections were anticipated. '!he Architect, for the Applicant, Frank Reese, stated Braun Engineering has provided soil tests and there are no co=ections . anticipated for brilding construction. Pl......h"J .... .....i ..sien Meet.iJ!q 3 11-04-92 PIlBLIC HI!lMIN:; - CllSE #92-17: REZalIN:; AND PLl\NNI!D UNIT DEVEWPMENl'. CI.1NELlUiD AVENUE. JaIN ARRELL (continued) . Elizabeth M:xk'':'9tte of 3743 New Brighton Road Commented she had seen the surveyor out am after the surveyor left, she noticed her stakes were missing' . She requested the Awlicant find out why the stakes are missing' am have them replaced at the Applicant's expense. winiecki noted the ..nhni.....ion staff report fran the Fire Marshall to Zoning Administrat= Iage dated November 4, 1992 relating' concerns to sprinkling' the blildi.ng am provision of a fire access road around the blilding . Architect Reese stated that the Fire Marshall had inlicated to him that sprinkling' the entire blilding am garages would be sufficient am the access road would not be JlCCCf'E'll)'. He stated he will CXlfitact the Fire Marshall to rlie',.,".... this matter am resolve it prior to the council ll'eeting' . A resident voiced concern relative to sufficient space for the proposed fire access road around the entire blildi.ng. '!he Architect explained there would be adjustments on the west am south sides am the slql6S would be leveled out if the road is required. Mr. Bergly stated, at the lOClSt the roadway would be 10 feet wide am would be =vered by grass. He noted the road would be maintained during' the winter months. '!he resident referred to member Carlson's original question on soil =ec:tion am also questioned if the water would run arT:{ faster into . the porn. '!he Architect explained that there are no soil corrections needed am the runoff from the site will not be worse than current conditions. He advised he is not required by storm water regulations to improve the runoff condition on this site, only to maintain it's existing' conditions after construction of the blilding. Developer John Arkell spoke about the proposed senior housing' project am highlighted the following' items the development will provide: price of hames, on-site caretaker, meal pro:JICll1l, van/taxi transportation. area hospital visits (Ihysicals, etc.), wellness program, am social events. vice Chair winiecki asked if there were further camnents from the floor, hearing' none, she closed the public hearing at 8:20 pm. Winiecki asked the Applicant if MI'C bJs service would be provided as well as some type of shelter for residents while they waited for the hls. '!he Applicant stated that MI'C in the past has been helpful in adding a location to their bJs route. He advised he is not opposed to providing a shelter for residents am wi1~ contact MI'C regardirg the route am shelter. McGraw questioned if the En:Jineer reviewed the waterflow am if arT:{ new area would be considered for drainage, run-off am water a=umulation. Bergly stated the engineer did look at all of the above mentioned items am recommerrls approval fran the Rice Creek Watershed District as a . cornition of recommended approval from Ccmnission. Winiecki questioned if each unit would be harrlicap adaptable. Applicant stated normally all units are rented prior to construction canpletion. ----- -- ----------- p' ..nnh"J n. ..... i..sian Meeting 4 U-04-92 Cl\SE #92-17: REZCImC 1\ND PINlNED UNIT OEl7ELOl'MEN1'. CLEVELAND AVENllE. JaIN 1\RKELL (Continued) '!he Applicant does not dis=iminate as to where a handicap resident . would like to live, therefore all units are handicap adaptable. Carlson moved, seconded by Mc:Q'aw, to waive the Develq;:ment Moratorium Ordinance. All voted in favor. (5-0). , M::Graw moved, seconded by Petersen to Rezone the property iran R-2 to R-3 upon issuance of a J:uilding permit for the pxoposed PUD with a density of 6.5 units per a=e as allowed in the proposed Zoning Ordinance revisions. All voted in favor. (5-0). Carlson moved, seconded by Mc:Q'aw to recommend to Council awroval of Case #92-17, PUD General Developnent Plan and Final Plan for the Cottage villas of Arden Hills with conditions A thru G outlined under #3 of the Plarmer's report dated November 4, 1992, and further conditions as follows: 1) the three items listed in the Fire Marshall's memo of November 4, 1992 to Catherine Iago relating to sprinkling the J:uildin;J and the fire acx:ess road; 2) that a bus shelter be provided for residents of the complex; 3) that a ~te area be established in one of the courtyards in lieu of the area shown in the circular drive; and 4) that the lot stakes be replaced at the residence of Elizabeth MOO""""9tte, 3743 New Brighton Bd at the expense of the applicant. All voted in favor. (5-0). ClISE #92-19. W1lIVER OF ~ CIlO:INlIN::E: 2020 TJI[K I:lUVE. afEN R1lSMUSSEN Planner Bergly referred to his report dated November 4, 1992, and . explained that the Applicant is requesting that the Moratorium Ordinance be waived to allow him to construct a 24' x 40' (960 sf) garage/5t=age bJildin;J that is allowed under the present Ordinance. Bergly reviewed the findings listed in his report: 1- '!he present Ordinance does not limit the size of such a~~ory 1::uildin;Js. 2. '!he proposed Ordinance, as revised at a recent Plarming Commission meeting, would limit such a=<:nry J:uildin;Js to a maximum size of 700 sq. ft. 3. The Applicant's lot is located in a small neighborhood with smaller, lower value hames, many with =nsiderable outdoor storage. 4. The Applicant's lot is 20,000 sq. ft., =nsiderably larger than the 11,000 sq. ft. allowed in the R-2 District so the ratio of the garage to the lot will be similar to a standard lot with a standard garage. 5. The Applicant's new home is =nsiderably larger than other homes in the neighborhood. The larger detached arro.'''''sory J:uilding was planned as part of the original developnent and to be =nsistent with the existing Ordinance. The garage is staked out and crushed r=k base is in place as well as a crushed r=k drive next to the house. The applicant was unaware of the Moratorium Ordinance . until he applied for a a building permit for the garage. 6. The proposed garage is needed to house two =llector cars (now stored in the attached garage) arrl miscellaneous material and equipment now stored outdoors. - -- --- p'..nnh>q o......iAAion Meetinq 5 11-04-92 Cl\SE #92-19: DIVER OF H::'RM'CRItIM ClIDINAK:E: 2020 TBCM muvE. aml JUISM[JS8DI . 7. '!he proposed garage will help to reduce the 1-35 traffic noise impact on the Applicant's backyard. 8. The ern of the structure facing 'Ihcm Drive will be a fairly stan:lard garage width of 24 feet. '!he 40 foot depth will not be evident from 'Ihcm Drive. 9. A 30 ft. x 48 ft. (1440 sf) 21 ft. high steel pole l:uil~ is located on the lot ilmnediately west of the subject lot. For cc:mq:erison, the ptopose:i structure will be 24 ft. x 40 ft. (960 sf) and 10 ft. high on the eave line. 10. '!he roof of the structure will be the same color as the roof on the house, and the exterior walls will be lighter than the house b..rt in a similar color. Planner Bergly recommerxied the following action: '!hat the waiver of the Moratorium be approved to allow construction of a garage that would be allowed utrler the existing Ordinance for the reasons stated in the above fin:iings. winiecki requested the recording secretary incorporate into the record, the letter of objection received from Dana Souther, 2018 '!han Drive, dated November 3, 1992. Carol Fischer, co-owner of the property at 2020 'Ihan Drive resporrled to the letter from Souther by advising Conunission of several neighborhood disputes with this person. Fischer noted that the letter did not appear . to be objecting to the garage, b.rt objecting to the overall developnent of this site. Zonin;J Administrator advised Conunission that arv-<><:sory l:uil~ must be setback 10 feet fran the rear property line and 5 feet from the side property line in an R-2 district. She noted the plan showed the setbacks reversed and asked the Applicant if these requirements could be met for placement of the structure. OWen Rasmussen agreed to place the structure 10 feet fran both the rear and side property lines. Petersen moved, secorrled by Piotrowski, to recommerxi to Council approval of Case #92-19, Waiver of the Developnent Moratorium Ordinance to allow construction of a garage utrler the existing Ordinance based on the reasons outlined in the Planner's report dated 11/4/92. Motion passed. (4-1). (Petersen, Piotrowski, McGraw and Carlson voting in favor; winiecki opposed). Cl\SE #92-20. SIDE YARD SETBl\CK '\7J\RD\la: FCR IJiIEL:LIm EXPANSION. 1127 c5HMEIM AVENUE. RICK AND SHERIL'lN JIllNSClN Planner Bergly referred to his report of November 4, 1992, and explained the Applicant is requesting a variance from the required 10 foot side yard in the R-1 District to allow the dwelling to be expanded to be . within 6 feet of the lot line. A 4 foot side yard variance is therefore required . ------- ----- planning n .....; ....ton Meeting 6 11-04-92 Cl\SE #92-20. SIDE'\OOID SE1'Bl\CK Vl\lUAN::E PeR ~ EXPANSION. 1727 amTm\M AVENUE. RICK AND SHERILYN JmNSCIl Bergly revie!wed the fWings listed in his report: . 1. '!he lot is tapere:i, therefore the house is not parallel with the side lot lines. '!be house has a 6 foot jog in the west wall so that no portion of the dwelling would be nearer than 10 feet to the west lot line. 2. '!he house illImediately to the west has an identical jog. It appears that it has been exparrled to the rear to avoid encroachment on the side yard. 3. E:xtendin:J the dwelling 4 feet to the west would encroach on the side yard that is nearest to an entirely glass wWow-wal1 arrl an open deck on the house to the west. 4. It appears that the house could be expaOOed to the rear arrl avoid the side yard encroachment. However, without lmowing the interior layout of the rooms in the house, the Planner cannot recammend this approach. 5. The handwritten dimensions on the plan do not =espond with the Certificate of survey dimensions so the exact p:>sition of the house is not known arrl the requested variance may not be exactly four feet. 6. It appears that the site corrlitions are not unique to this property. There are a number of unusually configured lots in this su1xli vision arrl throughout the City. Plarmer Bergly recamrnended the following actions: 1. That the request for a variance be denied. . 2. That the following considerations be attached to the action as rationale for denial: a. That the shape of the lot or the terrain does not prohibit reasonable use of the property. There are numerous other lots in the immediate vicinity with similar lot configuration. b. '!he original house was designed in a manner to avoid side lot encroachment, as were many others in the subdivision. c. There appears to be a possibility of expansion to the rear that could be done without a variance. McGraw stated that to grant a variance the Applicant is required to show hardship. He asked the applicant if there is an identifiable hardship. . '!he Applicant stated they did not need a 4 foot variance for the entire length of the illlprovement area, only a portion of the area, clue to the shape of the lot. The A[:plicant stated there would be no windows facing the neighbor and the neighbor had no objection to the construction plan. McGraw moved, seconded by Erickson, to deny the request for a variance, for the reasons outlined in the Planner's report arrl that no hardship exists. All voted in favor. (5-0) . . . pl'''....h>q OcmIIission Meetillq 7 11-04-92 DISCOSBICIf: amER ~ ISSUES . 1- Prooosed Sian Ordinance Conunission decided to defer this discussion until the next meeting since 2 members are absent. CXJV1tCIL REP(Rl' Deputy Clerk, rage reported an Planning items of interest to Camnission. She informed the Camnission that the Referendum for a new Public Works/Parks & Recreation facility did not pass and the eouncil members elected are: Paul Malone, Beverly Aplikowski and Dale Hicks. She also stated that eouncilmember Tom Mahowald would be contacting all members and asking them if they are interested in serving on the Commission after the first of the year. ADJOORN McGraw llIOved, secon:led by Petersen to adjourn at 9:50 p.m. vice Olair Jeanne winiecki . . , . . November 9, 1992 HAND OUT PACKET RE: COTIAGE Vil.JLAS OF ARDEN HILLS JOHN ARKELL The developer has submitted the attached material in response to Planning Commission discussion and action: 1. Revised site plan and grading plan showing: a. New fire hydrant locations as requested by the Fire Chief, . b, Proof of parking for potential future spaces to meet 2: 1 parking requirements, Outside surfaced congregating spaces to replace area previously designated in c, the center of the circular drive and parking, d. Relocated sign location meeting front yard setback requirements, 2, A plan for the proposed project identification sign, 3, Parking demand as determined in other similar projects by the applicant. 4, Letter from Dan Winkel indicating that the fire lane around the building (previously recommended by the Fire Chief and Dan) is not needed. ;dmn .- , -- . ,------_ I It} ( -_ -, !'t I I' r Ibn;HTfI,L f>u II 1 PM<..t<:tH"TlJI4! f L (3<>t:~) I I -... - -- -- , 6 - - ----f. r'lo'I' .. ONE STORY QARAQE ~<T""",,~.... " j; ,OlE STORY TWO STORY .BUILDIMG QAIIA'" ~ - ... IJ"II' Ilk," '; . ~ - ""'" I . n SiTe PLAN . "''''TtA - - , . \ . . l'"leafi:40L.'7io ~1~1.r" M6TJooL F.....<:.iA. """"TlfIQ",L OTTAGE VILLA t.' MIiT,,"- L.E"TT'Wa~ = ~ OF I..Jlo..p 1t1t)1~ ~t III ARDEN HILL ~l<:1>.OE I' I '.J .ar...c> II 1 : "')(4 P04iT~ . II \ . q I I II I I J SIGN ELEVATION Y4~ltd' +-1l~n+ ~IP~~ U . J a '-011 J COU~H? \)cT\o~: G.'tP S\tC^l\,m"'" oval2. 2X4 $TUO~ @. 1<1' o. &", Flt4I~'" MTL' T<> ...."T"W. &=.~~I5~e. - .... - --. .------ . /~U#''iL~/Y OIW(9fat'5s 1v'~ 10');: . 0/ l1bt October 30, 1992 City of Arden Hills c/o John Bergly 1450 W, Hwy 96 Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112 Re: Cottage housing parking ratios Dear John, The following is a list of parking spaces to units allowed by other communities; City Units Parking Ratio Comments . Stillwater 1 (60) .8 too few Stillwater 2 (64) 1.5 adequate Stillwater 3 (56) 1.5 adequate McFarland (72) 1.5 adequate Maplewood (60) 1.5 adequate Maplewood,West (108) 1.5 adequate Cottage Grove (60) 1.5 adequate Spring Lake Park (86) 1.5 adequate North St. Paul (94) 2.0 too many We have found that a ratio of 1~ parking stalls per unit works well in OU~ developments. I am not opposed to reserving a future area for additional parking if needed, but I would appreciate it, if we could keep it as a green area until a need was shown. This is a tight site to work with and I would like to preserve as many trees as possible. Thank You, ~~G.:~...RL John Arkell - - Cottage Lifestyles, Inc, . 3585 N, Lexington Ave, . Suite 218 Arden Hills, MN 55126 . 612-490-0263 __.__u____ . NOV- 9-92 MON 15:25 P,OI . CITY OF 1lRDEN HILLS MEXIlANOOM D1\TE: ~ 9, 1992 TO: cathy :tago, Deputy Olexk/Zoninq 1\dministrator FRa!: Dan Winkel., Assistant Fire Marshall .D 4. W. SUBJECT: Review of the Final Plans for the "Cottage Villa" Developll8nt Fire Marshall Mike Zustiak and tnyself have di6CU6Sed the prcposa;1 final plans for the "Cottage villa" development. last week Mr. ZUstiak did fini out from the developer that the entire complex will have a fire suppression sprinkler system installed. 'Iherefore, we feel that it is not necessary to have the proposed fire aocE'SS road hlilt ~ the complex. . 'Ihe hydrant loc:ations will also be reviewed with the developer prior to the installation of the water main extension for the project. DAW:rk .... - , ' ST CROIX VALLEY INS SERV 1+612+439+1149 p.e! . O#e(9~a:~ Of lIlll City of Arden Hills c/o Cathy Iago 1450 W. Hwy 96 Arden Hills, Mn. 55112 Dear Cathy, . As per the request of the Planning Commission and as part of the F.U.D. process we will set aside an area near the entry of our development for a bus shelter that either the bus company will supply or we will be responsible to construct upon the . service being available to the site. \~e also agree to provide a ground mounted and landscaped sign at the entry designed in accordance with the city sign ordinance. Sincerely, t'kQ~ I i i I , , I ..... r 1 . I,;,' , ' , I crrl( OF ARmJl HILLS . MEH:llANIl(II !>>.TE: November 9, 1992 'lO: cathy rage, Deputy Clerk/Znnh"1lldministrator FRCK: Dan Winkel., .l\ssistant Fire Marshall JJ II w . SUBJECT: Review of the Final Plans for the ''Cottage villa" Developnent Fire Marshall Mike zustiak an:i myself have ni"<"lSf;-=<l the proposed final plans for the "Cottage Villa" develq.AlIe\1t. last week Mr. zustiak did fin:! out from the developer that the entire cc:mplex will have a fire suppression sprinkler system installed. iherefore, we feel that it is not necessary to have the proposed fire acx:ess road b.lllt s=ounding the =rrplex. !he hydrant locations will also be reviewed with the developer prior to the installation of the water main extension for the project. DAW:rk . - - - -------.-------- 6?.5E j?2-/7 J58Y/S~,() //-tf-9z.. - - . 3. That the PUD General Development Plan and Final Plan be approved as proposed with the following conditions: a. That a parking ratio of 1 garage space and .5 outside spaces be provided for each unit and that .5 spaces per unit (30) be approved as "proof of parking" to be constructed at such time as the City determines that the need for such addjtional parking is evident. b. That the water management plan be approved by RCWD, DNR and U.S. Corps of Engineers and that copies of any required permits be fIled with the City. Measures to improve the water quality in the existing pond should be investigated in conjunction with these permits. c. The site construction plans be approved as part of the Development Agreement with the City. d, That Fire hydrants be located as required by the Fire Chief. e, That Park Dedication requirements be stipu1ateed in the Development Agreement. f. That appropriate bonding for landscaping and costs associated with City review . and inspection be stipulated in the Development Agreement and that an escrow account be established to cover such costs, g. That the sign location shown is not approved. :dmn - - /~u. .:rr fL - IY Ohe(9~a~Ss '~~ ItjI/I~ . 0/ 11th October 30, 1992 City of Arden Hills c/o John Bergly 1450 W. Hwy 96 Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112 Re: Cottage housing parking ratios Dear John, The following is a list of parking spaces to units allowed by other communities; City Units Parking Ratio Co_nts . Stillwater 1 (60) .8 too few Stillwater 2 (64) 1.5 adequate Stillwater 3 (56) 1.5 adequate McFarland (72) 1.5 . adequate Haplewood (60) 1.5 adequate Haplewood West (108) 1.5 adequate Cottage Grove (60) 1.5 adequate Spring Lake Park (86) 1.5 adequate North St. Paul (94) 2.0 too JDany We have found that a ratio of 1\ parking stalls per unit works well in Our developments. I am not opposed to reserving a future area for additional parking if needed, but I would appreciate it, if we could keep it as a green area until a need was shown. This is a tight site to work with and I would like to preserve as many trees as possible. Thank You, ~~4w,1::D , John Arkell . Cottage Lifestyles, Inc, . 3585 N, Lexington Ave, . Suite 218 Arden Hills. MN 55126 . 612-490-0263 . ' , DATE: November 4, 1992 FROM: Fire Marshal Mike Zustiak Assistant Fire Marshal Dan Winkel - . TO: Catherine Iago, Deputy Clerk/Zoning Administrator RE: Case # 92-17 - PUD, Cottage Villas of Arden Hills, Cleveland Avenue, John Arkell Fire Marshal Mike Zustiak and I have reviewed the most recent plans submitted for the "Cottage Villas of Arden Hills" development located on Cleveland Avenue, south of County Road E-2. There are a few issues related to fire safety that we would like to bring to the attention of the Planning Commission. The issues are as follows: l- During the plan review, neither the Fire Marshal nor I could identify a fire suppression sprinkler system for the entire complex. It is the opinion of the Lake . Johanna Fire Department that the entire complex should be sprinkled. 2. The proposed fire hydrant location does not appear to be adequate for fire department equipment use. It is requested that an additional hydrant be installed and the location of both hydrants be discussed with the Fire Marshal. 3. The Fire Department is concerned that there is no access to the rear portion of the proposed buildings for fire equipment. It is requested that a 10-ton access road, twenty (20) feet wide, be constructed around the entire complex. This type of fire access road has previously been requested and constructed when development projects have had limited or no access for fire equipment on the rear portion of the building. Thank you for your consideration of the above listed items. . . rI/,I~ -:J- CONSULTING ENGINEERS Maier Stewart & Ass'ociates Inc. MEMO TO: Catherine Iago, Deputy City Administrator FROM: Mark Graham, Maier Stewart and Associates, Inc. /l1G- RE: Planning Commission Case #92-17, Cottage Villas of Arden Hills DATE: November 3, 1992 FILE: S20-000-00 We have reviewed the site plan and grading/utility plan for the above-referenced project and offer the following comments. The development consists of construction of a retirement home complex with two garages, an outside parking area, extension of sanitary sewer and water main from existing utilities in Cleveland Avenue and placement of stonn sewer. . Sanitary sewer work will be connected to an existing S" City sewer in Cleveland Avenue, . extension of S20 feet of S" sewer, and two manholes. This sewage would drain to the north toward the Cleveland Avenue lift station. Permit approval from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency will be needed for this work. Watermain work will include connection to an existing S" City watermain in Cleveland Avenue, extension of S20 feet of 6" watermain, and placement of a hydrant. Permit approval from the Minnesota Department of Health will be needed for this watermain work. Stonn sewer work will include 12" and IS" pipe and six catch basins or manholes. Pennit approval from the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) will be required. We contacted Mr. Pete Fryer at the RCWO regarding this project. As of this writing, this development plan has not been received by their office. It is the RCWO's responsibility to approve the methods of draining stonn water run-off. It appears that run-off will be collected in a new pond to be built along the west edge of the development. An existing wetland area also borders the development on the south and west sides, As with other private developments utilizing municipal utilities, it would be appropriate for the City Engineer to review construction plans and inspect construction of the improvements. The costs associated with review and inspection are borne by the Developer and should be specified in the development agreement for this project. An escrow account to cover all City costs should also be established. All municipal utilities must be installed in accordance with City requirements. All pennits must be received prior to construction and a preconstruction . conference with the utility contractor will need to be held prior to commencing the project. MJG:tp 1959 SLOAN PLACE, SUITE 200, Sf. PAUL, MINNESOrA 55117 612.n~21 9800 SHELARO PARKWAY, SUITE 102, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNEsorA 55441 612.S4lK)432. Equal Opportunity Employer 0ln<I30< ,... . CITY OF 1IRDEN HILIB llDDU\NDlIK DATE: NcMDber 4, 1992 TO: P'''''''~"'1 C-~""icm and cathy Iago . :nul: JBvi4 ltriese1, 11ltH "h"1 ,-.,"J?"""tar stJBJB::l': case #92-17 1l.........~"'1 , p'.......... tIlUt: DeY8lcpDent/oot:tage Lit'est:yles In l.oo1dn:1 over the information given to me regard:in:J this devel~, I Wa1ld Z"'" . ....-r:d that there I:le a fire ~~ road around the entire bni Mi1YJ ca1Plex. I feel it is not feasible the way it is shown at this time. If yen shculd like to n;e'r...... further, please let me knc:M. rK/rk . . PIERCE REESE ARCHITECTS LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL . 5903 Kirkwood Lane Plymouth, MN 55442 To: Cathy Iago Date: October 30, 1992 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS Comm. no: 92031 1450 West Highway 96 Re: COTTAGE VILLAS OF ARDEN HILLS Arden Hills, MN 55112 WE ARE SENDING YOU X Attached __ Under separate cover via the following items: __ Shop drawings X Prints Plans _ Samples -- Specifications __ Copy of letter __ Change order Copies Date No. Description 1 10/30/92 Drainage calculations 1 " Environmental Assessment Worksheet THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW: X_ For approval __ Approved as submitted Resubmit . copies for approval X_ For your use __ Approved as noted Submit copies for distribution __ As requested __ Return for corrections Return corrected prints X For review and comment -- FOR BIDS DUE 19 PRINTS RETURNED -- AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS ~s also sent tq Mark Gra~ ~~ COpy TO FILE SIGNED: 92031tra.006 . ~ ~.f#-r ~I 11~/fz.. r- , . '. . DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS FOR COTTAGE VILLAS OF ARDEN HILLS . BY MERILA & ASSOCIATES, INC. 10/29/92 . PIERCE REESE ARCHITECTS, . 5930 Kirkwood Lane Plymouth. MN 55442 . (612) 5514810 ---------- - ------- --- == - "'" ::! 0", Ill, a. ... - '" i!:1:l '" 0:' on a.'" 0 . '" ~ z ~ z E 0 u - -=, ,,<>0 o r"OYlI < .,,::..r: 'l"": "'"':~~Z " .. .. ""M(<) oJ E ~t:=o 0000 :: QI ~"": .....COo,O",,, , .. 1l'I>1t'J1n 1I'i~.; M M ~Z"'''' CZ)CDCDm -"'''' 00 co to CD a 0 00 o lQlo:lI < , "'''' e.! "'! C\! z u ' , ,"'''' "'".... ..."'''' "''''''' "'''' "''''''' = ~~~ 0'0\00 'l"":..... ~ "": "M'" M'llfMM oJ E 0'00..0 mt:g~ o T"" co I..... ::: ~ ..g &r.i ..aICiMM .E.J:mco mcotoCD '" -"'''' CDr;;gtDa;! '" ::> - , .... "'0 ooU)U) '" '0'" ~ C'oJ ('\,I '" , U ' - a;a;"":p...: ,"'''' 0 ...",,,, CDlXllXlCD ~ "'''' co 00 co en WW - - - -, = ...... ~ ci..tl'.I ~ ~ r-.. '0.......... . << iE"~t's{\l~ Mlriuil.C 00 "i~~"'! ,........-.:rOJ U >u.(WJr') Wo:rQM z -o~ p..,an C'-l..._ln U j;eS.."l en 1,." 11' M ;: <!l 00 0000 '" 1--" - '" (j) ~"'On,...an CN........1O Z " .e-l!!~~~ C1'lnO'lM 0" Z D-(!l 00 0100.0 -oJ 0 r,;-"':' "'0 g . '" '" NIt'J\t)CD jlll ,e-. e......... ............. .- ::>:.:: I- "- - -= o@ ~ UJ "! ~ :;!J; <( CQCOlO...o UU -l ~013.....t\I ";<:iiD..D :J QJO~"!C"1 CD,..tn!:\J 0 (.) 0""- ~"':o"": -l _~t'!~ MOQ'lCT\ <( "'''' lrilrioioi 0 - Q ~ """: ~ 1n"=t1nl,Q Z "'i~~ ...: r:i M C'; ..... 1"" _..- <!J r;TLnc-J U')C'\l.,..N (J>"",.... o.D".....,..,... (j) <00 0000 '" - 0: ill E=!!~~ 1:'1'0"....."- i5 ' It1 CfJU) ctl 0 ::I ... U . . o~..;,..: ,.t w<<oo ~ 00'" !:C. i It 111 \D '0 (\/.....,...,10 ~... ~ 1O_C\lN 0 " QI (; ..r: C'.! 0000 ,!!: III .; ill E<<'O'O "- III .....:f a: 3= CIS - c ::! '" "'''' C'D\nN"" ~ ~ 0: ;: . II ill 5lo";C\l1n (l'lt.,")('\,I ,... '''' t:u.- '" '" . Iii u. c > "'< z..... .. (j) -' UI UI . Q) ::> :3 ~ ..M ~~o~ ci 13"< <>0 Ol UlUI" a _ _ ..........,..1- Z" cc~c !:C "'oJoJ QJOJCD~ CIS t;~ "UUl U ,~ (;1000 .... 0 ..... Ill... ::!m::; "'.. lDC-l C\I.... 0 gg OJ o:z::> l- E <> 0 0'0'00 OJ''' a - ~ ....... ....... 0 -' (j) " III III OJaJClOJ "--' u: lii"-~ LL (.;l (.) Q'..) U Q -..--.--- MERILA &. ASSOCIATES, INe, . 8401 73RD AVENUE N,. SUITE 63 . BROOKLYN PARK, MN, 55428 . (612) 533-7595 ...- . . ..-_.... '.." -.. ~. .,-. , . '-',_. ._,-. - ...... ,. . ..._....- .-... --- .-..' . . . . .....:........-- .~~---..._'_.~ -~.-........_"....;_.-~-. ,,-_. ''''-'-'--, -., "-- . ' . : - . . . .. . ......-. ....":-'- ....-..-" ..--,-.-.... -...... ~_. . - .. -.,. ,.. . .. 'F~~~\ IT!2~~~.-:,(cE\JE~~D--U:>NDmON) ....... nO- ' . ...... .~:,\2.Bif'5_d::-Rt,{~btf':<~':2.? ~l/e'.5 . ( 100- '['f _ Eve~) ., .~_ ... ..M_._....... ......_. ..". ,......_ _._." _.' .' '.,h. ~ . --... . ..-.. .__'.. U,' .._'..._.... ",_'," ..~ ~_ ..__0-0 -..-..-.--. ... ".:: 1.5:~~;e$::'di';;ns:-b ":€ed-\;';;e;';; talicn PO'f'cd '-'-:'~~';:;:';Sv~~.~~d~~~~".<:l\('e~+\~/-. b\)Je+I~VI d O~b.-~~~S-:~5:-deVel~cl Yl-\V\# crt. 3.2. CFS )..\1oi~G~-'-?u-~iff:;--'4.BiFS :: C\DO-YYt~~-t) b~SedO-0 .... P.e - 'Exi em:::) LDI\di +; OY\ A \ \cw~~1a. al~C.~~ r~4e ~ '2edwV'€\I\ ta116Y"l l-O",d == 4.g- 3.2" \.10 Cr=-S 10 \ v\cV\ 0'(1 ~ce -7> \.~ C~ I'VId'X < l.b C.FS . . ,ANAL'T''SI-::, DATE: SHEET 10 - 2"'. _c; 2 / DRAWN: DESIGN: CoT\' ACC:le:. VILLAS C\2_1\ 1 CI'-'C. OF 1P... SHTS, . Cottage Villas PROJECT NO, 92-111 ORIFICE LOCATION: Sedimentadon Pond Outlet CALCULATIONS BY: CNC DATE: 10-29-92 FILE: ORIFICEWR1 ORIFICE DESIGN Peak AlIo\'llable Outflow Rate 1,6 CFS IORIFICE TYPE COEFFICIENT I Normal Water Elevation 683.5 MSL I Sharp-Edged 0,62 I High Waler Elevation 885,5 MSL Round-Edged 0,98 OrifICe Coefficient 0,62 Shon Tubes: Orifice Diameter 6,0 Inches Fluid Separation 0,61 No Fluid Separation 0,82 I DESIGN: Rounded Entrance 0.97 Calculated OrifICe Diameter 6,0 Inces Reentrant L < 1/2 D 0,54 OrifICe Radius 0,25 Feel Reentranl L = 2-3 D 0,72 Peak Outflow Rate 1.3 CFS Smooth Ta ered Nozzle 0,98 STAGE-DISCHARGE TABLE . I DEPTH INCREMENT 0,10 FEET I ELEVATION DEPTH I DISCHARGE IELEVATION i DEPTH i DISCHARGE I 883,50 0.00 NA 885.20 i 1.70 ! 1,2 883,60 0.10 NA I 885,30 I 1,80 I 1,2 883.70 0.20 NA I 885.40 I 1,90 I 1,3\ 883.80 I 0_30 I NA 885,50 I 2,00 ! 1.3 . 883,90 I 0,40 I NA I 885,60 2,10 I 1.3 I I 884,00 I 0,50 I 0,5 I I 885.70 I 2,20 I 1.4 I I 884.10 I 0,60 I 0,6 I I 885,80 I 2,30 I 1,4 I 884,20 i 0.70 I 0.7 I I 885,90 I 2,40 I 1.4 I 884,30 ! 0,80 ! 0.7 I i 886,00 ! 2.50 ! 1,5 I I 884.40 i 0,90 i 0,8 I I 886,10 i 2,60 i 1,5 i I 884.50 I 1,00 I 0,8 I I 886,20 : 2.70 I 1,5 I I 884,60 I 1,10 ! 0,9 ! I 886,30 I 2.80 I 1.6 I I 68' - - 1 no ' 1 0 ' I 8M - 40 ' 2 90 ' 1 - , ".IV :L I ' lOb, I ,I ,b I 884,80 I 1.30 I 1,0 I I 886,50 I 3,00 i 1,6 i 884,90 I 1.40 I 1.0 I I 886,60 I 3,10 I '1.6 I I 885.00 I 1,50 i 1,1 i I 886.70 I 3.20 i 1.7 i 885.10 1.60 I 1,1 I I 886,80 1 3,30 ! 1.7 I NOTE: " NA" INDICATES THAT THE DEPTH IS LESS THAN THE DIAMETER OF THE ORIFICE . ,. WORKSHEET 2: Runoff Curve Number And Runoff . Project: Cottage Villas Calculated By: CNC Project No. 92-111 Date: 10-22-92 Location: Arden Hills Checked By: File: TR-55'wR1 Date: Drainage Basin: Pre development Condition Runoff Curve Number (CN) Soil name Cover Description CN Area Product and of hydrologic (cover type, treatment, and from in CN x A/'e'a group hydrologic condition; percent impetvious; X_ Table 2-2 X_acres unconnecte&conn~ed _ Fig, 2-3 _sq.mi. (Aooendix A) impetvious al'l?a ratio Fiq, 2-4 0/0 Udorthents Clayey Sand with Weeds 60 I 2,5 150,0 . I TOTALS 2,5 150,0 GN (weighted) = total product I total area = 60,00 Us",CN = I 60 I Runoff ! Stonn #1 I Stonn #2 I Storm #3 ! Frequency, yr. I 1 I 10 I 100 I Rainfall, P (24-hour), in. I 2.4 : 4.2 5,9 Potential Retention,S, in, I 6,67 ! 6.67 6,67 Runoff, Q, in, I 0.15 I 0.86 I 1,86 . TR-55 3 WORKSHEET 3: Time of Concentration (Ie) or Trav~l Time (It) . Projec1: Conage Villas Calculated By: CNC Project No, 92-111 Date: 10-22-92 Location: Arden Hills Checked By: File: TR-55.WRl Date: Drainage Basin: Predevelopment Condition Check One: X_To _Tt Sheet Row Seqment #1 Seqment #2 I Subtotal I 1, Surface DescriDtion (table 3-1) Weeds I NA i}}}::}}:;::q 2, Manninq's Rouqh Coeff.,n (table 3-1) 0,100 NA :;>>>>>}~::1 3, Flow Len-qth, L {total <- 300 ft}, ft 300 NA :::::::::::::::;:::::::::::::1 . :} - ? ............................. 4, Two-year 24-hour Rainfall, P:..., In, _.7 2.7 }}}}~{<{ 5. Land Slope, s, tt/ft 0,033 NA .:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::1 6, Tt=O,007(nL)AO,B/(p2)AO.5(s)AO,4, hr 0,25 NA I 0,25 I Shallow Concentrated Row . Seqment #1 I Seqment #2 Subtotal! 7, Surface DescriDtion (paved/unpaved) NA i NA ::;:::::::::::;::::::::::::::1 8 FI L h L ft NA I A f""",.,"',..'..,"""""l . ow en~ t , . N ~::::::::::::::::::::::~::::::~ 9, Watercourse SlaDe, s, ftfft NA NA 1:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::1 10, Averaqe Velocitv, V (fiq,3-1), tt/s NA NA t}}}}}>>j 11. Tt _ U3600 V, hr, NA NA I NA I Channel Row ! Seqment #1 i Seqment #2 Subtotal i 12. Cross Section Flow Area, a, (ft)"2 I NA I NA :;::;;:;:;:::;::::::::=:::::l 13 Wetted P",imeter Pw ft I NA I NA >:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::1 . 7 I '"......,'.............-...-..,1 14 -''''d I' . aIPw t I -,,',-,'-.,',',',',',','-.,',' , Hr' rau Ie RadiUS, r = , t ,NA I NA [:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::1 15 Channel Slope s ft/ft i NA . NA f.:;:::;:::;:::;:::::::::::::::1 . . I r' i l:::::::::::::::::::::::::;:::t 16, Mannlnq's Rouahness Coeff" n . NA ! NA f:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::1 117, V = 1 ,49(rYO.67(sYO,5/n, ftis I NA i NA 1))))))):::1 18, Flm',; Length, L ft : NA I NA k::::::::::::::::::;::::::::1 P9,Tt=U3600V,hr. I NAi NAI NA! Total 20, Watersh<!d or Sub-ar<!a Tc or TL_ Total I 0,25 , . TR-55 4 WORKSHElOT 4: Graphical Peak Discharge Method . Project: Cottage Villas Calculated By: CNC Project No. 92-111 Date: 10-22-92 Location: Arden Hills Checked By: File: TR-55,WRl Date: Drainaae Basin: Predevelopment Condition Peak Discharge Calculations 1, Data: Drainage Area, Aa 2.50 acre Drainage Area, Am 0,0039 sq, mile Runoff Curve Number, Cn 60 Time of Concentmtion, Tc 0.25 hr, Rainfall Distribution Type II Q,IA,II, III) Pond and swamp areas spread throughout watershed 0,00 (percent of Am) 2, Frequency, year I Stann *1 1 I Stann *210 I Stann *1300 I . ':::::;:::::::::::::::::::::::;::::::::::::::::::;:::::;::::~::::::::::::::::::::;::::::::; 3. Rainfall, P (24-hour), inches 2,4 I 4? ! 5,9 I ;:::;:;:::::::::::;:::::::::):::;:;:;:::::::::::::::::::::~::::::::::::::::;:::;:;::::::1 4. Initial Abstraction, la, inches 1,333 I 1,333 I 1,333 I (L 't ff) .. .. .. ' .. - .. --l' " " " - .. " , . 'l" , . " .. .. , 1 asses pnor 0 runo :-:.;....-:..-:.............. ............................. .......................:.:.:. ;;::::t:::::=::::::\:::t:::::::::::::::::\:::::::: ':::{/::::\\:::{1 5. Compute lalP t 0,556 I 0,317 t 0,226 I ;.',;.'.',',','.','.',..',',' ,'.',',.,'..,'.',',',',',',', """-",-",-""""",,,,1 ,',,""""'" ,<"""'" -"" ,.""""",. ,< 6, Unit Peak Discharge, qu, csmJin .' """""i~~T-"""""""'~~~"I".."""'.".,"~'~~"1 (Use Tc & laJP with ex, 4-11) 7, Runoff, Q, inch 8, Pond and swamp adjustment factor, Fp 1,0 I 1,0 I ' , ,- 1.ll i (Use pe",ent pond &swamp area r-:-:'..-"'-"',.,""',.'t,",.,"",.,"""",.,",'-}'-',-,',',',-.',',',',',',',', :: ~=~e:~2~:::::~ss~~~; area_) r,:;::'l,j;!;\:!<;!';;\:j;:tl;.!,,::l:'!,:l,:'::'::j',l,ll!;,i,;::i,;:[:,:rl:\,;:!:,lll 9, Peak discharge, qp = qu*Am*Q*Fp, CFS (;.:-:-:-:,;.;.;.:,~:~;.(<,:-:,;.;.:<,:-:,:~:t(-:,:-:-:-:-:-:-:,:-~:~;'1 . TR-55 ~ WORKSHEET 6a: Detention Basin Storage. Peak Outflow Discarge (qO) Known . Project: Cottage Villas Calculated By: CNC Project No, 92-111 Date: 10-22-92 Location: Arden Hills Checked By: File: TR-55,WR1 Date: Drainage Basin: Predevelopment Condition Detention Basin Storage 1 , Data Drainage Area, Aa 2,50 acre Drainage Area, Am 0.0039 sq, mile Rainfall Distribution Type II (I,IA, II, III) ~_,_.~t~~ ,~~,.,_,l",~t~~~~,....J""~t,~~~,~?,,, ,I . 2. Frequency, year I :,:-:::::,:-:<::-:<,:<~,: l':-::-:':::-:-:-:':<~:~:r:':::':<':::-:<:~~?<l f:::::::::::-:::::::::::::<<t<::-:::::::::::::<:::::::::V:::::::::::::::::<::::::::j 3. Peak Inflow Discharge, qi,cfs I""",,, ,,~:1, _1"""",.2..1,'_,,,,,,,,, ,4:8, t::::::::::::::::::::;:::;:::;:j;:::::::;:;:::::::::::::::::::~:::::::::::::::~:::::::::::::~ 4, Peak Outflow Discharge, qo, cfs I NA ! NA I NA I :::::::::::::;:::::;::::::::1:::::;:::::::::::::;:::::;:J;:::::::;:::;:::::::::::::::j 5, qo/qi ' NA ! NA I NA I k<-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:,;.:L,:,:,;.:,:-:-:,:,;.:-:,:-:-L:-:-:-:-:-:<-:.;,:-:-:-:-:1 6, VsNr (Use fig, 6-1) r"""."':"""'~~'r""."..""'."'~j~'T'"""""'-.'~~1 f'" ,.,.,.,',',.,.,., -: ': -: ':. {:-:':- :':-: ':-:':-:':-:- :<-: >.; -: < ':-:-:-;.: < -: < -: < < '1 7, Runoff, Q, inch ,"-""-"'~,i~-l--""-~,~~'r--"-'l~~~l ~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~::::::::::::::::::.::::::::::~:::.:::::::::::::::::::::::::t 8, Runoff Volume, Vr, ac-ft '0,03 I 0,18 ! 0,39 i 1"'::::::':':'-::'::-::':::::":-::>::'';:>::':::';:::::-:I:::::::::::::::::':::::::::::l "_".""",'1-'",."".",,, ",""""'" 9. Storage Volume, Vs, ac-ft I NA I NA i NA I ~<::::::::::::::::::::::::<:t:::::::::::::::::::::::::::r:::::::::::;.::::::::-::::::j 10, Maximum Stage, Emax (From Plot) I" " . "NA;" '" - , NA' :" , " " " 'NA 'I TR-55 . (, WORKSHElOT 2: Runoff Curve Number .And Runoff . Projecl: Conage Villas Calculaled By: CNC Project No, 92-111 Date: 10-22-92 location: Arden Hills Checked By: File: TR-55,WR1 Date: Drainaae Basin: Developed Condition Runoff Curve Number (eN) Soil name Cover Description CN I Area I Producl and of hydrologic (cover type, treatment, and from in eN x Area group hydrologic condition; pel'Cenl impervious; X_ T~ble 2-2 IX_acre~ unconnecledfconnecled _ Fig, 2-3 _ sq,ml, (ADDendix A) imDervious area ralio Fiq, 2-4 I % Udorthenls Urban lawnlParkinqIBuildinas 90 i 2.5 225,0 I I I . I I I I I I I t I I I ! I I nJ I 2.5 I TOTALS eN (weighted) = total prodUC1 / lotal area = 90.00 USe eN = I 9^ I VI Runoff I I Slonn #1 I Slonn #2 I Storm #3 I I I IFrequency, yr. I 1 I 10 I 100 I Rainfall. P (24-hourJ, in. ! 2.4 i 4.2 i 5,9 i Potenlial Retention, S, in. t 1.11 1.11 I 1.11 I , IRunoff, G1. in, I 1.44 I 3,11 t 4.75 I . TR-55 7 " . WORKSHEET 3: Time ofCo!!.ce!!.tration (fe) or Travel Time (ft) . Project: Cottage Villas Calculated By: CNC Project No. 92-111 Date: 10-22-92 location: Arden Hills Checked By: File: TR-55,WR1 Date, Drainage Basin: Developed Condition Check One: X_Tc _Tt Sheet Row Seqment #1 I Seqment #2 ' Subtotal I 1 S rf D ,-,' (hi 3 1) La NA -"",.,.,.", 'l . U ace escn"tlon ta e - ' wn I :,:::,::::::::::::::::,:,'::,1 2, Manninq's Rouqh Coeff.,n (table 3-1) 0,300 NA f:}}}}}}}l 3, Flow Lenqth, L (total <= 300 ft), ft I 100 NA ::::,::::::::::::::::::::::::l 4, Two-year 24-hour Rainfall, P2, in. 2.7 2.7 }}}:<<<<l 5 La d SI::=-: ftIf 00"0 I NA "",',..',','.',-.','.',.,', . nODe) s, t .. ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 6, Tt=O,007(nL}AO.8/(p2)AO.5(s)AOA, hr 0,31 I NA 0.31 I Shallow Concentrated Row . I Seqment #1 I Seqment #2 Subtotal I 7, Surface Description (pavedluncaved) Paved NA }'::::::::::::/::::::::I 8, Flow Lennth, L, It. 300 NA }>>>>>>:::. 9, Watercourse Slope, s, ftIft I 0,01 I NA \:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::1 10, Averaqe Velocity, V (fiq,3-1), ftfs I 2 I NA 1}::::::::::::::::}:::::1 11,Tt-U3600V,hr, I 0.041 NA I 0.041 Channel Row ; Seqment #1 I Seqment #2 i Sublolal i 12, Cross Section Flow Area, a, {ft)e2 I NA i NA (:}::,:::},:>::::j 13 Wetted Pe.imeter Pw ft I NA I ~IA f:::::::::::::::::::::,:':::::l . 1 I I ..~ .'.....'..,......-..... ......i 14, Hvdraulic Radius, r = alPw, ft I NA i NA (,:::::,::::::\::::;:::':1 15. Channel Slope,s, ftfft I NA I NA U>>>><<::1 16, Mannin,,'s Rouqhness CoefL, n ! NA! NA f<::<<<<<:} 1 7 V 1 49( ')AO -7( )AO "I It! N' , N' ~,_"_""""""""",,,..1 . -. I .b S .::1 n. s I ^ I n ~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::I 18 Flm" Lencrth L ft : NA I NA ~::':::"':':::-:':':::':::::: I. 't' .=" t...............'l 119, Tt = U3600 V, hr_ I NA i NA ! NA ! Total 120, Watershed or Subar"" Tc arT\.., Total ! 0,35 i . TR-55 8 " . WORKSHEET 4: Graphical Peak Discharge Method . Projec1: Cottage Villas Calculated By: CNC Project No. 92-111 Date: 10-22-92 Location: Arden Hills Checked By: File: TR-55,WR1 Date: Drainage Basin: Developed Condition Peak Discharge Calculations 1, Data: Drainage Area, Aa 2,50 acre Drainage Area, Am 0,0039 sq, mile Runoff Curve Number, Cn 90 Time of Concentration, To 0,35 hr, Rainfall Distribution Type II (I, lA, II, III) Pond and swamp areas spread throughout watershed 0,(1(1 (percent of Am) Storm *1 I Stonn *2 I Storm *3 I . 2. Frequency, year :::;:;:::::::::;:;:::;:;:\L:::::::::::::::;:::~:~:: <:::::;:::;:::;:;:;~;:~~d 3. Rainfall, P (24-hour), inches 2,4 ! 4,2 5,9 I ;:;:;:;:::;:::;::::::::::::::c:::::;::::::::::::::;:;:::{:;::::::;::::::::::;:::;:;::1 4. Initial Abstraction, la, inches 0,222 ! 0,"2" I 0.222l (Losses prior to runoff) ::::m:::::::::m:::um~:::u:::::?:::::::W:::{::::::m:::um::::::::::1 ,. Compw. ,.,., 1."'~:~"~J".'.""~:~;~I",,~,:~~,;,i 6, ~::;:~ ~~~~~e~;~4~1~;nn ::,::,::::::::,:,::'~:i~J',::,::"::',::.:.:~f~j.::''::.::":'.::':~~~j <<<<<<:>C:<<<<<<f>>>>>>>l 7, Runoff, Q, inch I Q".44!" 3:ii i "'4.75! 8, Pond and swamp adjustment faclor, Fp (Use percent pond &swamp area with table 4-2. Factor is 1,0 for zero percent pond and swamp area,) 9, P...ak discharge, qp = 'lu*Am*Q*Fp I 3,6 I 8.1 i 12.8 I . TR-55 <7 WORKSHEET 6a: Detention Basin Storage, Peak Outflow Discarge (qO) Known . Project: Collage Villas Calculated By: CNC Project No, 92-111 Dale: 10-22-92 Location: Arden Hills Checked By: File: TR-55,WR1 Date: DrainaQe Basin: Developed Condition Detention Basin Storage 1. Data Drainage Area, Aa 2,50 acre Drainage Area, Am 0,0039 sq, mile Rainfall Distribution Type II (I, lA, 11,111) l.,"~t~~,#1,_,t,,"~~~~,#2,___I_~I~,m.~,,~~" . .1 ,:-:,:,:,:,:,:-:':':';':':-:': ,:,:,:,:,;,:,:",:-:.:.:,:,:,f:,:,:,:,:-:':':':':':':-:':': . 2, Frequency, year 1 10 I 100 :,:,:;:::;:::::,:::::,::::::: ::::':::::::::;:,:;:::::::::::E:::::::::::::::::::::::;:::;: 3. Peak Inflow Discharge, qi, cfs 3,6 8,1 12,8 ::::;:::;:;:;:,:;:;:::;:::;:,~:,:::::::::::::::;:;:,:,co::: ,;:,:::::;:::::;:;:::;:;:::::: 4, Peak Outflow Discharge, qo, cfs 0,1 i 2,1 I 4,8 ! 5, qolqi 6. VsNr (Use fig, 6-1) 7, Runoff, Q, inch 1.44 I 3.11 I 4,75 I ..::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ~<:::::;::::::::::::::::::::: {:::: ~:::.:::::::::::::::::::::~ 8. Runoff Volume, Vr, ac-ft 0,30 I 0,65 ! 0,99 I :::::::::::;:::;:,:::::::::::{:::,:::::::::::::,:::;:,::::,,::::::,:::,:;:::::;:::::::::, 9, Storage Volume, Vs, ac-ft 1""_,_~;R)."_O'~q,,.,,,O}3.: ~"-':':':""""""""""f"""-""""-""'"'..,', """"",-""""""",:,1 10, Maximum Stage, Emax (From Plot) i' , , ' , , . - i,iA': ' , , , , . ' , , ' NP: :. . . . , - . , . , 'NA. i TR-55 . 10 .e,.,' . -. . Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EA W) NoTE TO PREPARERS q'10 '31 . This worksheet is to be completed by the Responsible Governmental Unit <RCU) or ill asents. The project propc>Mr must supply my noasonably accessible data nec:essaI}' for the worksheet, but Is not to lDmpIete the final worksheet lIaeIf. If a complete answer does not fit In the space allotted, attach additional sheets u necessary, For assistance with this worksheet lDntact the Minnesota Environmental QualIty Board (EQ8) at (612) 2%-82S3 or (toU.free) 1-800-652-9747 (ask operator for the EQB enWonmental review program) or CDDSUlt "EAW Guidelines,- a booklet avaIlable &om the EQIl, NOTE TO REVIEWERS Comments must be submitted to the RGU (see item 3) during the 3O-daycomment period foUowlng notice of the EAW In the EQB Monitor, (Contact the RGU or the EQB to Ieam when the COIIIIIIent period ends.) Comments should acid.- the lIlXUlaC)' and completeness of the Information, potentlaI Impacts that may warrant further investigation, and the NBI for m EIS. If the EA W has been prepared for the scoping of an EIS (see Item 4), lDmments should address the accuracy and completeness of the Information and suggest issues for investigation In the ElS, 1. Project nua C.OTT"-G,E VILL.A.0 OF ,t>..1C.06-10 HILLS - A (00 U"'J\TBUILOIN~ 2. Propos" GO 11" J>, '" e L.ll"e SoTYl..EF7 3. RGU OIl( 0 F ,A.1<..t>~1U H lu..~ Contact person .JO \-l0 Al2.K.eLL. Contact person CATI4I<.J l.J~ lA-aO Address 358S LEXIHGirOfoJ A~,N, and title ZOfoJlt-Ja. ~1~I'7TAA'iOR.. AF:.D~t--) H 1L1..~ M I-J -551'2.~ Address 1450 W. HIWAY q<o Phone (!,p12) 77Cf- 24501 A.IW€' t-J I4\L~, MN 5'5 112- Phone (&('2.) 1433- S~7~ 4. Rauon lor EAW P.-parallon o EIS scoping lS.mandatory EAW o citizen petition o RGU discretion 0 Proposer volunteered If EA W .....as-;. mandatory give EQB rule category number(s) 4'1-10, 4~oo . 5. Prolocl Localfon '1/4 Section 2- ~ Township go 10 Range .b3..!11 S ,1/4 IN County I2AM 5 e; Y C1tyA'wp ARpeaJ HILL.~ Attach a>pies of mch of the follmDing to the fA W: a. a county map showing the general location of the project; b. copy(ies) of USGS 7.5 minute, 1:24.000 scale map (photocopy Is OK) Indicating the project boundaries; C. a site plan showing all significant project and natural features, 6. DescrlpUon Give a lDmplete description of the proposed project and ancillary facilities (attach additional sheets as necessary), Emphasize construction and operation methods and features that will cause physical manipulation of the environment or produce wastes, Indicate the timing and duration of lDnstruction activities, BUII...P A 2$TOR.'<' ,A...'PARTl--letJT ~ULL.PIN6J WI 6J....RI>.GtfO f. ~UR"~E "'''''~~''''G, ~N C."'i'JT6R. 0;: ~ITe;, ~"Me SOIL.. MDP'F"",T,Oo..J WI~~ af:"-lE'C~$SAIlt..,.. Ufo.)OGrI2. F.JU1L..l::>lNc:., l='ooTINcs.~, CO\..>~TR.\)c..I\OIo.l W\L.L. ...TART lSNt:> o...q2. o to:. SPRIN60otq'1 ^ "r&Al2.. TO GOMp'l..eTe. l'l!:>'" Tl-lI::;' '1A'1Z6 4f..lO 'NH..L TNC.€ ) pl<.ojecr II-..:> A~ I+I(..L$, /vi N. , . Provide a 50 or fewer word abstract for use in EQB Monitor notice: SEE "ex:NE ITer"" (p 1 - -. 7. PnIIIct Mognltude DI1lI "I Total Project AR!ll (acres) .I1r It_Slk fr1'~ Number of ResIdential Units "..~.._1.-..lI Attached &0 . c.BkB.adll/lful,.&ial.' h~~l_~....d BttiWh'D A._ (grosa floor space) Total oquare feet; Indicate area of specific uses: N A Office Manufacturing Retail Other Industrial Warehouse InsIItutionsI Ught Industrial Agricu1tural Other Commercial (specify) Building Height(s) 20 n:e:T 8. Permt. II1d Approvala ~ulred List all known local, state, and federal pennits, approvals, and funding required: Unit of Government Type of Application Status GIT'r' "F /"tIlDEiIoJ Hlu...:!> PUD, V....I'/.IAt-)C6 <t ~eZDIoJE .....Pf'I.I..P Foe " " . " eUII-DI~~ ~,",Io\IT Yer T" t>a ~1Jm5' 0 p ~1'J'lEt.>"T'/, /.II P t: ^ I M'N cC t PGPT'. OF lleAI-Tf-l fM,!!>Mlm;p1 (Jt.:>DGR. lCevlEc RIClS c.€e-eiC. W4TE't$'1l6.o DI<jr. GoI2A.DII\lG, pe~MI" " I' ,II CORP5 O~ 51.lG;IN~I2.'" WETI..!\IJD MOIll~lCATl~ peRMIT " " II 9. Land UN Describe current and recent past land use and development on the site and on adjacent lands, Discuss the compatibility of the project with adjacent and nearby land uses; Indicate whether any potential conflicts involve envlromnental matters, Identify any potential environmental hazard due to past land uses, such as soli amtamination or abandoned storage ~~E 51Tc AI->D rw~ LA~D TO Tf.le ~~T\f .,,,1I1i \'JOT e.lSaJ DlSVI5'I-"pep, WI1Gt.J I'!SW . WA", ~U\l..i Ai-I. W,.., F\.Al:.6j;) IIJ we c.€rVTeR.. OF'THIS <;\TS. ""DJAc.e'UT US>S7 A~e j2e;::>IDeIJTI~L AS. Tl-II$ Pf20.16<:-T ISo. NO PAS'T I;:;f\JVIIWN\o1~TAL WAZ.....1LD 1l~,lIfZ,!" I<tJow I\l '-0 W-Ave =GI.J 12~C> 10. Covar Typ.. Estimate the acreage of the site with each of the following rover types before and after development (before and . after totals should be equal): . Before After Before After Types 2 to 8 Wetlands :t J Urban/Suburban Lawn 0 2- Wooded/Forest 3"/1\ Landscaping J?3 Brush/Grassland 4 2.J:3 Impervious Surface .0 Cropland . 0 0 Other (deacnbe) 0 () 11. FIsh, WIIdIIfll, and EcologlCllly Senaltlve lINou~ a. Describe fish and wildlife reso\lro!S on or near the site and discuss how they would be affected by the project, Describe any measures to be taken to minimize or avoid adverse impacts. 'l"1oIE. WeT1.A~~ "5Ul"rOfC.T t-.)O FIS.II olt ~MILAM: ~p'(.Il.""TtDloJl TI-lei WdDD&t> A~e."" Ii".... Dee;", ~UIIC12~L~ f ell~,D7' l\.-le IV&TI..A,IoJD; 'NIl-I.. t-j"", e.E TOUCHe-D, Tfj5 VA':fr MAJ6~ITY OF T~ WODoeD Jl.1l.efA I-lli-l.. tJOT && ALT~il'D. MANY tJlT\IJ T14!!.5<; WII..L. e,e: P\.-4.tJTet:>.W1LDI..IFE. WILL IU.LO<."Te !',,"OIAUc DE:VeLOP6D1l>TII&UI.}DE';ye;LO~ "aRTlaU Of TI4E SITE. b. Are there any state-listed endangered. threatened, or special-roncern species; rare plant communities; colonial waterbird nesting colonies; native prairie or other rare habitat; or other sensitive ecological resources on or near the site? Jg] Yes (] No If yes, describe the resource and how it would be affected by the project, Indicate if a site survey of the resources was conducted, Describe m"'lsures to be taken to minimize or avoid adverse impacts, (;-1 "C.ALC::> ~ loJew . THE pR.ort;CRD WErl.A'.)C) WILL ioJOT CSe: TOUCffEDJ SU; n/6IT WEP-A"'D!.':> CI<~D, 2 ': ;. 12. PllyllcaJ Imp_ on W_ RaoUICM WiD the project involve the physical or hydrologic aIleration Cdredglng. fiI!Ing. ~ dIwI8km. oulfall structure. dlIcing. Impouncbnent) of any ourface water (lake, pond. wetland, IIIre8m" drainage dIIclI)? 11!!1 Yet .0 No If yes, Identify the water resource to be affected and deScribe: the alteration, including the construction process; volumes of c1reclged or fI1l material; area affected; length of stJeam divenion; water surface area affected; timing and extent of fiuctuatlcma . in ,water surface e1evations; spoils disposal sites; and proposed mitigation ml!8Sures to minimize Impacts, 'See. A~ 13. WI1Ir U.. L Will the project involve the installation or abandonment of any wells? 0 Yet l!1. No For abandoned we1Is give the location and Unique well number, For new wells, or other previously unpennitted we1Is, give the location and purpose of the well and the Unique well number (if Imown), b. Will the project require an appropriation of ground or surface water (incluc1lng dewateringl? 0 Yes II No If yes, Indicate the source, quantity, duration, purpose of the appropriation, and ONR water appropriation permit number of any existing appropriation, Discuss the Impact of the appropriation on ground water leveJs, C. Will the project require connection to a public water supply? ~ Y.. 0 No If yes, id~ the supply, the ONR water appropriation permit number of the supply, and the quantity to be used, "5EE A.1Tp.,cIH~9 14. Watar.relalld LInd lIMllanagement D1atrlclll Does any part of the project site involve a shoreIand zoning district. a delineated l00fmr . flood plain, or a state or federally designated wild or scenic river land use district? 0 Yet & No If yos, identify the district and cIiscuss the CXlII\patIbility of the project with the land use restrictions of the dlstrict. 15. W.tar Surface U.. Will the project change the number or type of watercraft on any water body? 0 Yet 'l(I No If yes, indicate the current and projected watercraft usage and discuss any potential oven:rowc11ng or conflicts with other users or fish and wildIife resoura!$, 16. SoIla Approximate depth (in feet) to: I ~ 0 I Ground water: minimum \ 'l- average t Z. Iledroclc minimum ~ average' Describe the soils on the site, giving SCS classifications, if known, (SCS inlelpn!lations and soU boring logs need not be attached,) SEIO A7T"AC~aD 17. ellllion and Sldlmentation , Give the acreage to be graded or excavated and the cubic yards of soU to be moved: acres 3 ; cubic yard. 10,000. Describe any steep slopes or highly erodible soils and identify them on the site map. Describe the ero.ion and sedimentation measures to be used during and after construction of the project. . ,-:.e MrA::HEP 3 . ,.. .... CMII1y.1urtIoo .... IIunDII L Compare the quantity 1!lCIlj\Wlty of alIe runoft boion I!lCI .,.. the project. Doocrfbe IIlIlhoda III be uoed III IIWIap ud/or _t runolf, SeE ATTl>.Ct+l!i'o . b. Identify the route(s) I!lCI naiving water bodies Cor nmo/f &om the slIe. EstlDI8Ie the Impact of the nmoff on the quaIlty of the naiving waters. af I1tt nmDff ""'Y offrd . .. ...-It "EA W GuiIIdina" .doul tI1IteI1ttr . JIldMd wp II7UIIysU ;. ....wJ 566 A"1I A<:HeI> ,9. WI1IIr ~1II11y. W..___, L Describe sources. quantities, me! composition (eoo:ept lor IIOnrW domestic _ge) of aIll8lliwy I!lCIIndUItriaJ _ten produced or ueated at the site, \"2,006 6Al.LOf..l!O- /p",y; 100 G,A(.lJ)"':;(DAy/~t-:; X 1'Ul PE'tl-~IJ$:::. b. Describe any waste tleatment methods to be used me! give estimates of composition after tleatment, or II the project Involves on..ite sewage systems, discuss the suitability of the site conditions lor such systems, identify naivlng waters (including ground water) and estimate the impact of the dUcharge on the quality of the receiving waters, (If I1tt Ifisch8rge filii)' .!fed . l8kz: amsw/t ",EA W Gwide/ina" .....1 ",Itdm . mdrimt Wget II1III/ysis is 1ItItded,) , N po, C. If wastes will be discharged into a sewer system or pretreatment system. Identify the system me! dlsaIss the ablllty of the ~ to accept the volume me! a>mMtion of the wastes. Identify any Im~ts which will be ~. -r "' ~ec.T WI~~ u...e nf 6'Xl:;nt.l<l; GlTY :l>A.""T...J<y ~ !>V~T~.... TKAT I~I T/-Ie' ~Tl'!:~O:T ~~~"'''Go ,1<,,,, SIre, TI-Ie' sy~Te'" H~ Tllli' CAF'Ji<:.IT'<' TO "'CGE:PT' TI+& YOL.Ufo;\E: 4 C6N1F: ~F W""",,,T<!$ "''''''M Tj.j,~ =WT~, . 20. Ground w..... - Polllltllllor Con1ImI..lIon \ 1\' L Approximate depth (in feet) to ground water: "l minimum; average, b. Describe any of the lollowing site hazards III grollJld waleO' me! aIJo identify them on the alIe 1Np: oinkholes; shallow Ilmestone formations/kantconditions; .,Us with high infiltration rates; abandoned or IIIIUIed wells. Desaibe measW1!S to avoid or minimize environmental problems due to any of these hazards. NONE' Of ~Ae>6v", .\\A'ZARt;>~ eJ(J?T....., Tttl? ~ITe, c. Identify any toxic or hazardous materials lei be used or present on the pn>ject sile and Identify ml!llSW'l!S to be used to prevent them from a>ntaminaling ground waleO', NONE., UNLEl77 l2ef..lT61>. 7 ():;C ij6UseHO~D HAZAt<I>Ou.<> W",o;TIf~. 21. Solid W_; lllzanlaus W_; SIilIIIgI TIIIks L Describe the types, 1DI01Dlts, and a>mposltions of soUd or hazardous wastes to be 8"'.elIted, Inc1udInf!; animal manW1!S, liudges and ashes. lcIentify the method and location of cIIaposal For pn>jects generating mlllllcipal soIld _ IndIc:ate II there will be a lIOWa! separation p1an; list type(s) and how the project will be modified III all!>w ~, NA . . . b. Indicate the number, location, size, and use of any above or below ground tanks to be used lor storage of petroleum products or other materials (except water), l'JA 4 . . i2. 1II1II': Parking spe""" added '10 ExistIng spaa!I (If pIOject InwIws e<p8JIIioN 0 IiItImaled IDIal Awnp Daily Traffic (AD1) generated 118 Estimated maximum .-u hour InIlfic pnenoled (If bawn) and 1Ia tImbtg: b 0 . 4~(, PM ,For each affected road indicate the AUr and the cIbecllonaI dIotribuIIon of trUIk: with ad without the project. Provide an ...timate of the impec:t on traffic: congestion on the affected roads and describe any tra/fk Imprc>1l1lll>llll whkh wID . be neteSSal}', S~E A1TA<:He'D 23. VahlclHelalld air amIsalona Provide an estimate of the effect of the projec:t's traffic: ll"'M'ation on air quality, Including carbon monoxide levels, Discuss the effect of traffic: implDVeDU!llls or other mitigation measures on air quality Impec:ts. (If Ute prDjed imJolws 500 In' m= ptlTki7Ig 5pGt%S, .....,.JI 'EA W Gtriddina. lIbout lDItrthor a 4dJIiW air IfIMIlity analysis is ...w,) "fI.j1~ PF.O...\a:T WILL '-'Of' cAUSE: A'NY 51,"'-IIFIG""'T l>eCRt:'~ ,"-' AIR Gl.UI>,LIT4'. 24. SlIdonllry aourca air ,mI..lona Will the project involve any stationary IIlIWCI!S of air emissiOIlS (such as boilers or exhaust stacks)? 0 Yes gj. No If y.... describe the soun:es. quantities, and composition of the emissions; the pn>posed air pollution control devices; the quantities and composition of the emissiollS after treatment; and the effects on air quality, 25. Will the project generate dust, odoR, or noise during ronstruction ad/or operation? I!'l Yes 0 No If y..., describe the sources, characteristics, duration, and quantlties or intensity. and any proposed measures to mitigate adverse Impacts, Also identify the locations of sensitive receptoR in the vicinity ad estimate the Impects on these receptoR, . DU'i>T l' 1JO'~ef '>J\L-~ e1O. ""lOtJe......~D 'r>'" TI<& ~L\p. GI'AO't.)u" UTIL'ITY ~ '12.""P C.~~T..uc.T'''N, G,AADlt-lG, ..~v~p!E COMl'\-ETCD j"-l 2- i-'\CUTw.i-i PRO.>e'C.T c.olllPl-ETep I~ q",OUT , ~O"'DWIu-5l!i SP"'IIl"'-101ZeP oUI""''''' c",r-.>9fe '1t) 1111""1"'<:'6 t>U~T, 26. Are any of the following resources on or in proximity to the site: .. archeologic:al, historical. or an:hitecturaI resoun:es? 0 Yes IilI No b, prime or unique farmlands? 0 Yes 1St No C. d...ignated parks, rs:rmtion areas, or trails? 0 Yes IllI No d. scenic views and vistas? 0 Yes IilI No e. other unique resouroes? 0 Yes 21 No If any i1ems are answered Yes, desaibe the resD\mle and Identify any impacts on the resouroe due to the project. Describe any measures to be taken to minimize or avoid adVI!ISe impacts, , Xl. Will the project create advene visual impacts? (EJamrp1es inclwk: gIan from inImst Jig/rts; lights ~,. ;" II1i1IU:ntess 1ftIIS; tm4 iIr8" Wible plumes from .ooli"g lDv>m /1r aIraust sfads.) 0 Yes III No If yes, explain, 28. eo....ldblllty with pions ,Is the project subject to an adopIed local cmnpehemive land use plan or any other applicable land uoe,. _. or """,uroe management plan of an local, rogionaL slate, or fe:Ier3I agerq? ~ Yes 0 No If yes, Identify the applicable p!an(s). discuss the compatibilily of the project with the plOvisions of the plan(s). and explain how any conflic:ts between the project and the plan(s) wID be resolved, II no, explain, r< D I ~ "CIS .( . THE' Pf'OjE'cT IS COlJ ~I~""''''r WITfl TflE clry COMPf<~\.j6~IVe RAN, Z.DNI~" 0 A c;TOt<:M IIJF-TeI2-. 1061 ~i. ?L.A,\-Cl, 5 . '. " 29. In9IcI 011 HraIructurw IIld PulIlIc...... wm _ or expanded 1I11III8, .-.. other IMutructwe, or publk -w. be ~ to laVe the project? lJ Yea il No IE yes. deocribe the new or addilionalln&ulnxtwe IwtrYka Meded. (Any ~ IIMI ;.. ._lIdrI oc&n" II1iIlt rropa:l 10 lite proj<<t ....., lie IIIIIeIMl ill ua. EA W; _ "EA. W GIIi4dbta" ",,"""J . 30. Ilolatad o-rop_; Culllllll1lw mp.c. .. Are future stages of this dewlopment pllnDed or 1IbIy? lJ Yea i!I No IE yes. briefly describe future stages. their tIInIns. and plans lor mvilvlUlll!l\tall'l!Yiew, b. b this project a subsequent stage of an artier project? lJ Yea i'I No If yes. briefly descrlbe the past development, Its tIInIns. and any pat envInmmentall'l!Yiew, C. Is other development antidpated on lIdjacent IInds or DIIIlOlll? lJ Yea a No If yes. briefly descrlbe the development and its relationship to the present project. d. If a.b. or c were marked Yea. discuss any cwnulatiw environmental impacts resu1ting from this project and the other development. 31. 0lIl... PaI8nllIl ErIYlrolllllllllll mpaCII If the project may cause any ad....... environmental impacts which were not addressed by Items 1 to 28. identify and discuss them here, along with any p1oposed mitigation, 1"161-1E . 32. SUMIWIY OF ISSUES (TIrjs sectUm ..- "'" lie _"'f'1dod if lite EA W is Img 4tme "" EIS """,mg; iMImd. .uras ~lermtl issua ill lite tlTtOft Sa>ping DcdsUm tUIannetrt lI1hidr ......, .......,..Ry lite EA W,) List any impacts and issues identified above that may require further Investigation before the project is CXlIIIIIIeIIa!d, Discuss any alla!matives or mitigatiw measures that haw been or may be considered lor these impacts and issues. including thoR that haw been or may be ordered as permit mnditions, il-fe /o.A^.):)c<:. ISSue I~ T\l~ "'001 ~I"'&, OF t-JO~- DI-ll<: Wlrrl.M->?$o, see: c.AL.'- 7 ,..o~ M\ilG,t.;no\o..), CERTIFICATIONS BY 1:HE RGU (aD 3 cer/HicaIions must be signed fat EQB acceptance of the EA W tor p!NlCation of notice in the fOB Monitor) A. I hereby certify that tile Information mntalned in this document is accurate and COIIIp1ete to the best of my knowledge, Signature B. I hereby certify that the project descnbed in this EA W is the complete project and there are no other projects. project stages. or project components. other than those described in this document, which are related to the project as "mnnected actions" or . .phased actions: as defined. respectively. at Minn, Rules. pts, 4410.ll2OO. subp, 9b and subp, 60, Signature C. I hereby certify that copies of the completed EA W are being sent to aD points on the official EQB EA W distribution list, Signature Title of signer Dale 6 MinnIClCtl EawirauDmtal C)Wil)' BO&I"d. :R.cvYcd Jwx 1990. , , " . 12. The proposed project comprehends the filling of approximate .06 acres of type 2 wetland, with approximately 520 cu, yds. of fill material. The building layout has been designed to minimiie filling of wetland acres. The wetland filling is proposed to be mitigated by the enhancement of approximately .09 acres of wetland that was disturbed during the previous filling of the site prior to 1977. 13. C. City water system. 100 gaIs./day x 60 x 2 = 12,000 gals,jday - Grand water depth - 12' . 16. ~ The soils primarily consist of a clayey sand fill ranging in depth of 25 to 34 feet overlying 4 to 5 feet of peat. 17. During construction, erosion and sedimentation control measures will include the installation of silt fence around areas that have the potential for erosion and all wetland areas, The new ponding area will be constructed in the early stages of development so that drainage from disturbed areas can be directed to it. All disturbed areas will be seeded or sodded and the silt fence shall stay in place until vegetation is established. . : . 18. Water Ouality - Surface Water Run-off A On the development portion of the site, the run-off rate increases from 4.8 cfs to 12.8 cfs for a 100 year event. A ponding area is prepared to be constructed that will detain the run-off from the project so that the rate of run-off does not exceed the pre-development rate of 4.8 cfs. The quality of site run-off after development will be improved over the current run-off quality. The improvement will be obtained by designing the sedimentation pond at least 4' deep and by controlling the rate of outflow from the pond to allow adequate time for the settling out of sediment and phosphorous, B. The project discharges run-off from the site to D,N.R. Protected Wetland No. 190-W. We do not believe there will be an adverse impact on quality of receiving water due to the design of the sedimentation pond, . 22, Traffic Parking spaces - 30 outside and 60 inside for a total of 90. - Estimated total Average Daily Traffic (ADl) 3.3 x 60 = 198 Peak hour (4-6 P.M,) 60 The current ADT for Cleveland Avenue is 3,300 in a North and South direction, while the current ADT for County Road E-2 is 7,200 in a East - West direction. The addition of 198 cars per day or an increase of 60 cars during the peak hour event are not expected to cause adverse traffic problems on either Oeveland Avenue or County Road E-2, . l il !I ., . 625-2454 633-3761 November 3. 1992 Cathy Iago 17 City of Arden Hills Planning Commission RE: Case 92.1/r FAX 633-7839 Waiver of Development Moratorium Ordinance (2020 Thom Drive) Dear Ms. Iago: I am writing to express my opposition to further development of the site at 2020 Thorn Drive, I am the property owner of 201 g Thorn Drive, the site directly south of 2020. The development of the home at 2020 Thorn Drive has already greatly exceeded the scale of the surrounding neighborhood in that it is a two+ story building with an oversized garage. Moreover, poor judgment was used in . the placemem of this home in relation to the lot and in relation to the existing dwelling at 2018 Thorn, A building of this magnitude both in square footage and visual mass should not have been allowed to be placed a mere 5 feet from the property line. This alone has substantially decreased the visibility from the surrounding homes, This single family residency already has a 3 car garage. Given the large percentage of development on this site, allowing more would only serve to further decrease the property values in the neighborhood, Sincerely I --"--'-.. (. .._'1.. ) Cl,'---'-'(!" ~;,. e--;(A-:lJ;,..~~ -- --- Dana Souther . ~ ~/t~ ~ --~-~-- - ." (!..c! ;-, ,.,<~, /", ;1.-7 ..' .'. C(''-.. 01<>/~ '-' ,..:.t.:"'_'~ ...."...,... '--"';' _....,.,,~ f <,'" f .' t" ;"...... ., .,a-,' . _ '.., _,' ~ ... (., .~_<;.~,."~' ,", . ,_ . l(i' Mlnn"~ota Department ~(T;~rtatl~n RECbvt:.w ,,~; 28 1992 Metropolitan District Transportation Building St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 . ~!:I Oakdale Office, 3485 Hadley Avenue North, Oakdale, Minnesota 55128 Golden Valley Office, 2055 North Lilac Drive, Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422 Reply to OakdaIe Office 779-1210 October 23, 1992 Telephone No, Thomas R. Sather, Mayor City of Arden Hills 1450 West Highway 96 Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112 Re: TH 51 near Lydia and Snelling Avenue (C,S. 6216) Dear Mayor Sather: Thank-you for your letter of September 22, 1992 concerning the intersection of Snelling Avenue and TH 51. I am sorry that the City feels there was inadequate opportunity to participate in the decision to close the median in the above-mentioned area. MnlDOT greatly values public participation in the decision-making process and we feel that adequate opportunity was afforded . in this case, The decision to close the median as-is cannot be revisited. Closing the median was necessary because of the number and severity of accidents occurring, To reopen the median would represent a significant public danger, a more significant danger than what results from rerouting traffic onto lower speed local streets. Reopening the median would also expose MnlDOT to liability lawsuits, Closing the median was agreed to as a first step until such time as alternatives could be explored and a mutually acceptable solution developed. As we have stated, MnlDOT is willing and able to work with the city to explore and develop alternatives for convenient and safe access to th~ neighborhoods in this area. We strongly desire to move forward and make progress in meeting your needs. Please have the chair of your Public Safety and Public Works Advisory Committee schedule a meeting, I suggest that you invite the city engineer and a representative from Ramsey County, as most alternatives involve roadways under county jurisdiction, If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 779-1210. Sincerely, :~/~ Tom O'Keefe, P.E. . Metro Division Planning and Programming '>;~17 ~ 1990 An Equal Opportunity Employer .... DRAFT CITY OF ARDEN HILLS . 1450 WEST HIGHWAY 96 ARDEN HILLS, MN 55112-5794 October 30, 1992 Mr. Tam O'Keefe, P.E. Minnesota Department of Transportation 3485 Hadley Avenue North Oakdale, MN 55128 SUBJEX::r : T.H. 51 Near Lydia ani Snelling Avenue (C.S. 6216) Dear Mr. O'Keefe: '!he City of Arden Hills has received your 10-23-92 letter regarding the closing of the T.H. 51 intersection near Lydia ani Snelling Avenue. '!he City wishes to continue i!;<:nJSSions regarding alternative access points for the residents affected by this closure. Possible alternatives include a frontage road to Lydia. Please advise as soon as possible. If you have any questions, please . =ntact me at 633-5676. sincerely, Dorothy A. Person city Administrator nAP Its . PHONE: 16121 633-5676 . FAX 16121 633-7839 ~1J!U.jc *REVISED* tJe. AGENDA . ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS MONDAY, NOVEMBER 9, 1992, 7:30 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDERlROLL CALL 7:30 P,M. 2. AGENDA ADOPTION 3. OAlH OF OFFICE - Dale R. Hicks,Councilmember 4. APPROVAL OF OCTOBER 26 COUNCIL MINUTES 5. CONSENT CALENDAR a, v Adopt Res, No, 92-68 Relating to Apportionment of Assessments Relating to Improvement No, SS-W-89-1 (Cleveland Avenue Lift Station) b, ... Pay Estimate No, 1 (Final) Cold In-Place Recycling Improvement as Approved by the City Engineer. c. v Pay Estimate No.4 (Final) 1992 Tiller Lane Street Improvements as Approved by the City Engineer, d, Approve List of CIaims/Payroll. . 6, PUBLIC COMMENTS 7, UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS A. Planning Commission Items: 1) Case No, 92-17; Rezoning and Planned Unit Development for "Cottage Villas of Arden Hills" on Cleveland Avenue, John Arkell, Developer. 2) Case No, 92-19; Waiver of Development Moratorium Ordinance to Allow an Accessory Building Allowed in the Existing Ordinance, Owen Rasmussen, 2020 Thom Drive, 3) Case No, 92-20; Side Yard Variance for Expansion of Residence at 1727 Chatham Avenue, Rick and Sherilyn Hanson, B, T,H. 51 Median Closing - Request for Alternatives, C. Discussion - Referendum #1 Election Results for the Bonding of Public Works Facility, 8, COUNCIL COMMENTS 9, ADJOURN NOVEMBER MEETINGS DECEMBER MEETINGS November 11- HOLIDAY-VElERANS December 2 - Planning Comm, 7:30 Pm November 16- Worksession, 5:00 pm December 14- Council Mtg, 7:30 pm . November 18- Finance, 7:30 pm December 16- Finance Comm, 7:30 pm November 19- Public Saf/Wks, 7:30 pm December 17- Public Saf/Wks, 7:30 pm November 24- Parks & Rec, 7:30 pm December 24- 112 DAY HOLIDAY-C.EVE November 26-27 HOLIDAY-lHKSGVG, December 25- HOLIDAY-CHRISTMAS November 30- Council Mtg, 7:30 pm December 28- Council Mtg, 7:30 pm . 'REVISED' ~ AGENDA . ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS MONDAY, NOVEMBER 9, 1992, 7:30 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDERIROLL CALL 7:30 P,M, 2, AGENDA ADOPTION 3, OAlH OF OFFICE - Dale R. Hicks, Councilmember 4, APPROVAL OF OcrOBER 26 COUNCIL MINUTES 5, CONSENT CALENDAR a. Adopt Res, No, 92-68 Relating to Apportionment of Assessments Relating to Improvement No, SS-W-89-1 (Cleveland Avenue Lift Station) b, Pay Estimate No, 1 (Final) Cold In-Place Recycling Improvement as Approved by the City Engineer, c, Pay Estimate No, 4 (Final) 1992 Tiller Lane Street Improvements as Approved by the City Engineer, d, Approve List of Claims/PayroIl, . 6, PUBLIC COMMENTS 7, UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS A. Planninl! Commission Items: 1) Case No, 92-17; Rezoning and Planned Unit Development for "Cottage Villas of Arden Hills" on Cleveland Avenue, John ArkeIl, Developer. 2) Case No, 92-yt~aiver of Development Moratorium Ordinance to Allow an Accessory Building Allowed in the Existing Ordinance, Owen Rasmussen, 20~0 Thorn Drive, 3) Case No, 92-.1"!l.; Side Yard Variance for Expansion of Residence at 1727 Chatham Aviliue, Rick and Sherilyn Hanson, B, T,H, 51 Median Closing - Request for Alternatives, C, Discussion - Referendum #1 Election Results for the Bonding of Public Works Facility, ~' COUNCIL COMMENTS +' 9, ADJOURN 0- -4,r NOVEMBER MEETINGS DECEMBER MEETINGS a... November 9 - Council Mtg, 7:30 pm December 2 - Planning Comm, 7:30 pm ~... November 11- HOLIDAY-VETERANS December 14- Council Mtg, 7:30 pm . __" ~ovember 16- Worksession, 5:00 p,m, December 16- Finance Comm, 7:30 pm ~ ~ovember 19- Public Saf/Wks, 7:30 pm December 17- Public Saf/Wks, 7:30 pm November 24- Parks & Rec, 7:30 pm December 24- 1/2 DAY HOLIDAY-C.EVE November 26-27 HOLIDAY-lHKSGVG, December 25- HOLIDAY-CHRISTMAS November 30- Council Mtg, 7:30 pm December 28- Council Mtg, 7:30 pm - II ... :/'/ /J'i/l : /)/: AGENDA ",:/,-1. . ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS MONDAY, NOVEMBER 9, 1992, 7:30 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDERIROLL CALL 7:30 P,M, 2, AGENDA ADOPTION 3, APPROVAL OF OcrOBER 26 COUNCIL MINUTES 4, CONSENT CALENDAR a, Adopt Res, No, 92-68 Relating to Apportionment of Assessments Relating to Improvement No, SS-W-89-1 (Cleveland Avenue Lift Station) b, Pay Estimate No, 1 (Final) Cold In-Place Recycling Improvement as Approved by the City Engineer, c, Pay Estimate No, 4 (Final) 1992 Tiller Lane Street Improvements as Approved by the City Engineer, d, Approve List of Claims/Payroll, 5, PUBLIC COMMENTS . 6, UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS A. Planning Commission Items: 1) Case No, 92-17; Rezoning and Planned Unit Development for "Cottage Villas of Arden Hills" on Cleveland Avenue, John Arkell, Developer. 2) Case No, 92-18; Waiver of Development Moratorium Ordinance to Allow an Accessory Building Allowed in the Existing Ordinance, Owen Rasmussen, 2020 Thom Drive, 3) Case No, 92-19; Side Yard Variance for Expansion of Residence at 1727 Chatham Avenue, Rick and SheriIyn Hanson, B, T,H, 51 Median Closing. Request for Alternatives. C. Discussion - Referendum #1 Election Results for the Bonding of Public Works Facility, 7, COUNCIL COMMENTS 8, ADJOURN NOVEMBER MEETINGS DECEMBER MEETINGS November 9 - Council Mtg, 7:30 pm December 2 - Planning Comm, 7:30 pm November 11- HOLIDAY.VETERANS December 14. Council Mtg, 7:30 pm . November 16- Worksession, 5:00 p,m, December 16- Finance Comm, 7:30 pm . November 19- Public Saf/Wks, 7:30 pm December 17- Public Saf/Wks, 7:30 pm November 24- Parks & Rec, 7:30 pm December 24.1/2 DAY HOLIDAY-C.EVE November 26.27 HOLIDAY.THKSGVG, December 25. HOLIDAY-CHRISTMAS November 30. Council Mtg, 7:30 pm December 28- Council Mtg, 7:30 pm . . crrY OF ARDEN HILLS M!KIWlOOM TO: Mayor and city Council . FRCM: Dorothy A. Person, city Mministrator DM'E: NavBDber 6, 1992 SUBJEX:T: city ]Imn;"; .ot.rator' s InfOJ:llBtion For Council MeetiDq of 11/09/92 I. ACITON NEEDED BY CITY OJUJIIMT,: Consent CaleOOar Item No. 4.a. regardinJ the Resolution Relating to Awortiomnent of Assessments Relating to IDprovement No. SS-W-89-1 (Clevelani Avenue Lift station). A resolution for apportionment of Assessments relating to the Clevelani Avenue List station is attached. '!he primary difference is that the Highway right-of-way property was not included. Consent CaleOOar Item No. 4.b. regarding the Pay E'.stiInate No. 1 for Cold In-Place Recycling Improvement - Contractor Ashbach Construction, Inc. has completed all work on Rouni Lake ani Dunlap street ani has met =ntract specifications per city Engineer awroval. The final construction cost was completed at awroxbnately 12.6 percent belClYl contract price. '!he Contractor is in the prcx::ess of sul:Initting final insurance ani warranty docllmPntation, so that the full payment will be reduced by $1,000 until these final items . are received by the City Engineer. Consent CaleOOar Item No. 4.c. regarding Pay EstiInate No.4 for the 1992 Tiller lane street Improvements - All work has been completed ani paperwork finalized including the Certificate of SUbstantial Colrpletion ani Minnesota DepartItent of Revenue Forms. Consent CaleOOar Item No. 6.B. regarding T.H. 51 Median Closing Request for Alternatives - The Minnesota DepartItent of Transportation has forwarded to the city written COIIUllLlIlication that the decision to close the nedian at Lydia ani snelling Avenue cannot be revisited due to public safety issues ani liability ~e to the state. '!hey also iIxlicated that alternatives can be explored ani developed. A draft letter is enclosed for your review to initiate an alternative with MnOOI'. Consent CaleOOar Item No. 6.C. regarding Referendum #1 - :Referendum #1 was defeated in the General Election. '!he results are as follows: PREX::INcr YES NO NON-varES 1 349 437 70 2 650 585 165 3 542 641 238 . 4 836 883 97 'IOl7U.. 2378 2546 570 (168) . . INFCmlM'ICIl FOR 0JUH::n. Page 'IWo November 5, 1992 II. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: . a. utility Increases: NSP has informed the City of an increase in rates, interim rate of 4.75 to 6.50 percent with a request to go to 8 to 10 percent. Gas increases 4.5 percent to 6.5 percent on an interim basis. b. city Hall Cleanim Service: Quotes were received from 5 contractors f= the cl~ of City Hall. '!he lowest quoted price is $30.00 per week or $129.00 per m::mth. Previously, the cost for the cl~ services performed was at $36.00 per week. These services will begin immediately with Coverall with a contract signed for the services per specifications and agreed upon. OAF Its . . " I . MINUTES CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING october 26, 1992 7:30 P.M. - City Hall CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor sather called to order the regular City Council meeting at 7:30 p,m, Present: Mayor Thomas Sather; councilmembers JoAnn Growe, Thomas Mahowald, Paul Malone. Absent: Dale Hicks, Also present were: Parks Director, John Buckley; Clerk Administrator, Dorothy Person; and Recording Secretary, Shar Foster. APPRECIATION OF FLOWER POWER VOLUNTEERS Parks Director Buckley and Flower Power Representative David Sand explained that the "Gateway Gardens" project has been done for four to five years with the help of volunteers who plant and maintain ten City flower gardens throughout the . community. They offered thanks and appreciation pins and certificates, on behalf of the citizens of the City, to all participating individuals or families listed below. Several of the participants were present to receive acknowledgment. The Counci 1 and audience applauded all the volunteers. David Sand Jean & Maxine Mootz Jan & Don Messerly Bill & Mary Gillies Faye Haugen Kathy and Tom Goserud Terry Post Renee Kaulfuss Megan & Larry Ricke Patsy & Rick Morphew Susan Ingeman will Sulzbach & Scout Troop 200 Vivian Straumann Mary Flor Cathy Olmscheid Carol & Jerry Moehnke Elaine Smith Carol Cafferty ADOPT AGENDA MOTION: Mahowald moved, seconded by Growe, to adopt the october 26, 1992 agenda as presented. Motion carried unanimously (4-0). APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MINUTES MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Growe, to approve the minutes . of the october 13, 1992 Regular Council Meeting as prepared, Motion carried unanimously (4-0), t " . Arden Hills Council 2 October 26, 1992 CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember Malone asked for further clarification on Consent Calendar items a, c, d, and e, with regard to item a, Councilmember Malone stated that his understanding of proposed Resolution 92-67 is that it requests the Commissioner of Transportation change the MSA formula in anticipation of potential transferring of jurisdiction over roadway segments from Ramsey County to municipalities, He asked if there is any information known as to which roads may be involved in this transfer. Administrator Person stated that informal recommendations have been made, but no formal decisions have yet been made. She added that several local communities are joining together in adopting this type of resolution. with regard to item c, Councilmember Malone asked if it is known why Ramsey County Sheriff's Office has unexpended squad funds available. Administrator Person stated their budget designated a certain amount for replacement of squad cars, those vehicles were purchased under budget due to a . joint purchasing arrangement, therefore authorization to use the remaining funds to purchase emergency equipment such as squad light bars is being requested. Malone stated there is a specific vehicle assigned to the City of Arden Hills and he questioned whether Arden Hills' portion of budget will be spent on outfitting the Arden Hills' squad. Person answered yes, that was her understanding. With regard to items d and e, Councilmember Malone stated he assumes the 1-ton trucks for the Public Works Department are just chassis, and he is concerned how Public Works expenditures will compare to budget, Administrator Person, referring to a memo from the Public Works Department, stated these are 1-ton chassis with specifications for dump box, plow, and salt/sand spreader to be added to each vehicle, Parks Director Buckley said he believes the cost of the one- ton trucks are offset by the rodder equipment on a trailer mount rather than a new chassis mount, MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Mahowald to approve the Consent Calendar and authorize execution of all necessary documents contained therein. Motion carried unanimously (4-0), a, Adopt Resolution No, 92-67 Approving the Joint Venture of County and Local Municipalities for . Committee Investigating and Reporting of Consolidation of Services, b. Adopt Proclamation Declaring the Week of November 8 through November 14, 1992 as "Values Week", , . Arden Hills Council 3 October 26, 1992 c. Approve Ramsey County Sheriff's Department Use of Unexpended Squad Funds to Purchase Emergency Equipment During the 1992 Budget Year. d, Approve Purchase of Public Works I-Ton Trucks ( 2 ) . e, Approve Purchase of Parks & Recreation 3/4-Ton Pickup Truck, f , Approve Administrative Policy on False Alarm Procedures. g. Approve City Hall Site Designation as a Santa Anonymous Drop-off Site for 1992. h. Approve Solicitation Request from Minnesota Public Lobby (Minneapolis Park Lovers). i . Approve List of Claims/Payroll. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS There are no agenda items under this heading. . COUNCIL COMMENTS ELECTION CANVASSING Administrator Person reported that Deputy Clerk Iago has requested the Council schedule a time for canvassing election results, and has suggested November 4, 1992. MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Growe, to schedule a special Council meeting to canvass election results on November 4, 1992 at 5 p,m, Motion carried unanimously (4-0), CITY HALL REFERENDUM Administrator Person stated that Council has been provided with the latest updates with regard to the City Hall referendum issue. She reported that a few phone calls have been received with regard to this matter as the information has been dispersed throughout the community, She stated that the types of comments received urge Council to be as conservative as possible, advise that other Public Works facilities may be available, and question where is the best and most cost-effective site for the facilities. KEITHSON POND UPDATE . Administrator Person reported that Keithson Pond work is expected to be completed within two days working time. Councilmember Malone commented that it appears Keithson Pond work is coming along very nicely, ! . October 26, 1992 . Arden Hills Council 4 FINANCE COMMITTEE Councilmember Malone recalled a recent Finance Committee report provided to Council and asked if Council had any feedback/input they would like to forward to the Finance Committee, particularly with regard to that report. Mayor Sather commented that the report was very easy to read and the presentation of information was very well done. Malone advised that the Finance Committee will be researching the matter of a storm water utility and will be reporting on this matter in the near future. Councilmember Mahowald asked if there will be a meeting to discuss storm water utility. Malone said it can probably be dealt with at a worksession. Administrator Person stated that Maier Stewart and Associates is compiling information with regard to storm water utilities in other communities, but it may be unrealistic to anticipate the storm water utility to be in place by January 1993. MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Mahowald, to schedule a Council worksession on Monday, November 16, 1992 at 4:30 p.m. Motion carried unanimously (4-0), . ADJOURN MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Growe, to adjourn the meeting at 7:52 p,m. Motion carried unanimously (4-0), Thomas R, Sather, Mayor Dorothy A, Person, Clerk Administrator NOTICE OF MEETINGS: City Hall Referendum information meeting will be held October 29, 1992 at 6:00 and 7:30 p,m, The next regular Council meeting will be held November 9, 1992 at 7:30 p.m. at City Hall. The next Council worksession will be held November 16, 1992 at 4:30 p.m. . -. . CITY OF ARDEN HILIB . RAMSEY CXJllNl'Y: RmJImIClII K). 92-68 RmClLtlTl:ClII RElATllG TO AP~'~CHO!Nl' OF MSESSMENTS RElATllG TO IMl'RO'lEm:NT K). SB-W-89-1 (c:::LE'lELMlD AV!HlE LIFl' STATIClII) 1IHEREl\S, the asz~"""ellt roll for Inprovement No. SS-W-89-1 was filed an::! certified to the County Auditor of Ramsey County on October 14, 1991, for the purpose of incll.ld.iDJ installments thereof to be collected alon::J with real estate taxes commencin;J in 1983; an::! 1IHEREl\S, since that date a number of parcel of property contained with said a"'''''''''''''"1el1t roll have been divided an::! conveyed by previous property owners; an::! 1IHEREl\S, the County Auditor of Ramsey County requires that apportiornnent of the original asz~sment against each original tract where it has later been divided, sold or conveyed, be made by the City Council of the City of Arden Hills in order that the proper az"essment can be extero.ed by the County Auditor against each parcel of property thereafter, commencin;J with an ass"'''''''"1el1t to be collected in the year 1992 an::! thereafter. HJW, 'l'BEREFClUl, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the city of Arden Hills does hereby make the following apportiornnent or original assessments as . contained in said assessment roll of September 9, 1992, against the follow.in;J described property: RESOIlJI'ION NO. 92-68 Division No. 63776 NAME OF ASSESSMENl': Improvement SS-W-89-1 DIP No. 6176 Auditor No. 6176 ORIGINAL PIN 'IOl'AL ASSESSMENl' A. 28-30-23-32-0002-3 $ 30,451. 98 B. 28-30-23-32-0003-6 8,700.57 C. 28-30-23-32-0005-2 70,847.45 REl\PFORl'IONMENT , A. 28-30-23-32-0029-8 $ 73,029.00 B. 28-30-23-32-0030-8 28,358.00 C. 28-30-23-32-0P31-1 5,885.00 D. 28-30-23-32-0032-4 2,728.00 PASSED AND Au.wJ:J:iU BY THE CITY CXXJH::IL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS THIS 9TH DAY OF N::lVEHIlER, 1992. . 'lhomas R. Sather, Mayor A'lTE'SI' : Dorothy A. Person, Clerk Administrator . . . . REAPPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA DIVISION NO. DJ063776 RESOLUTION NO. 92-68 DfP NO. 6176 NAME OF ASSESSMENT Cleveland Avenue AUDITOR'S NO. 6176 Lift station SS-W-89-1 ORIGINAL PIN NUMBER TOTAL ASSESSMENT A. 28-30-23-32-0002-3 $ 30.451.98 B. 28-30-23-32-0003-6 $ 8.700.57 C. 28-30-23-32-0005-2 $ 70.847.45 D. $ E. $ . F. $ G. $ REAPPORTIONMENT A. 28-30-23-32-0029-8 $ 73.029.00 B. 28-30-23-32-0030-8 $ 28.358.00 C. 28-30-23-32-0031-1 $ 5.885.00 D. 28-30-23-32-0032-4 $ 2.728.00 E. $ F. $ G. $ . ASSESSMT .FRM --- MINl1l'ES A~ CITY OF THE ARDEIl BILLS, HI!INESCIrA ~i PL>>lNDC ca!MISSICti MEI!:l'nG ~, RJ\1BIBER 4, 1992 . 7:30 P.M. - CITY Bl\LL CALL TO amER vice Chair winiecki called the JOOetin;; to order at 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: vice ClJair Jeanne Winiecki, Members Raymond M:Graw, Scott Peterson, Barbara Piotrowski, ard Dave Carlson. Absent: ClJair Dennis , Probst, Member steve Erickson, ard Council Liaison 'lhamas Mahc:Mald. Also present: Planner Jolm Bergly, Deputy Clerk Catherine Iago ard Rec:ordiIx1 Secretary Renee' Kaulfuss. APPRCI'lE MIN'llTES winiecki noted on Page 3 of the october 7 Plannin;J Minutes, Case #92-17, Rezoning ard Plarmed Unit Development, Clevelard Avenue, Jolm Arkell; the vote was not addressed. She requested the secretary add "All voted in favor. (6-0)". piotrowski moved, seconded by M:GraW, to approve the October 7, 1992, Plannin;J MinuteS as amended. All voted in favor. (5-0) PIlBLl:C HEl\RIm - CNlE #92-17: REZCIlIN3 AND PLANNED tlNIT DEVELfJFHI!Nl'. CI.E17EU\ND . AVENllE. .:Jam ARKELL vice Chair Winiecki opened the continued PJblic hearing at 7: 32 pII., ard as a courtesy to the public, requested an overview of the application of Case #92-17; Rezoning ard Planned Unit Development, Clevelard Avenue, Jolm Arkell, be given by the Planner. Planner Bergly refen-ed to his report dated November 4, 1992, ard , explained the Applicant is proposing to construct a 60-unit housing project on the Milton property on Clevelam Avenue. 'Ihe request before the Commission roil is f= approval of the entire PUD pr=edure, Rezoning, General Development Plan, am Final Development Plan. He noted the Applicant had a tight deadline to meet following the 10/7/92 meeting to suhnit plan changes f= this JOOetin;;, theref=e, several handouts on this matter are suhnitted by staff at the meeting this evening. Bergly reviewed the following items f= consideration by the Planning Commission ard noted the RaY!) apparently has not yet reviewed this application ard will also address the stam Water Plan: l. storm Water Management Plan: a. A detention pond is proposed near the entrance to the site to =llect stom water which will be slowly released into the existing wetlard/water areas on the site. b. A small area of existing starrling water is proposed to be . filled ard a similar sized area will be dredged also in the rear central area. c. Look at a positive opening in the north end to allow the water to flow ard clean the porri naturally. --..------- Pl""";.>q n......'i.."ion Meetinq 2 11-04-92 POBLIC HEARJ]I; - CASE #92-17: REZCIlDC AND PLl\NNm UNIT DEVELOPMENl'. CLEVEIAND AVEIIIllE. .JaIN ARXELL (Oon~im"""l 2. Reduction in Parking Requirements: '!he Applicant propOses 60 ,. garage stalls am 30 exterior spaces, am possible additional spaces oould be available in the green area located on both sides of the drive. 3. '!he I.aro~ Plan shows a good mix of trees, shrubs am plantin:] beds for annuals am perennials. Flower beds will allow the residents to be involved in the gardening. Mr. Bergly suggests the developer oonsider a surfaced outdoor congJ:egating space in one of the bio courtyards. 4. Lighting: AIx>ut 20 pole lighting fixtures are distrib.rt:ed al~ the drives am parking areas at about 30' to 40' spacin:]. '!he Planner summarized the project data on page 2 of his report. Planner Bergly recanmerxied the followin:] actions: 1- 'lhat the Moratorium Ordinance be waived. 2. 'lhat the 9 acre site be rezoned from R-2 to R-3 at a density of 6.5 units per acre as allowed in the proposed Zoning Ordinance. 3. 'lhat the PUD General Development Plan am Final Plan be approved as proposed with the followin:] c:on:litions: a. 'lhat a parking ratio of 1 garage space am .5 outside spaces be provided for each unit am that .5 spaces . per unit (30) be approved as "proof of parking" to be constructed at such tiIne as the City determines that the need for such additional parking is evident. b. 'lhat the water management plan be awroved by RCWD, OOR am u.s. Corps of Engineers am that copies of arr:l required permits be filed with the city. Measures to improve the water quality in the existin:] poOO should be investigated in conjunction with these permits. c. 'lhat site construction plans be approved as part of the Development Agreement with the City. d. 'lhat fire hydrants be located as required by the Fire Marshall. e. 'lhat Park Dedication requirements be stipulated in the Development Agreement. f. 'lhat appropriate I:xn:l.in;J for landscaping am costs ass=iated with City review am inspection be stipulated in the Development Agreement am that an escrow a=unt be established to cover such costs. g. 'lhat the sign location shown is not approved. vice Chair Winiecki asked if there were any questions or COIlU1leIlts from the Cammission. Carlson questioned the soil stability am if any =ections were anticipated. TIle Architect, for the Applicant, Frank Reese, stated Braun Engineerin:] has provided soil tests am there are no corrections . anticipated for I:W.lding construction. p',..mh>g .........l..sion Meeting 3 11-04-92 PIlBLIC HEMU!G - CASE #92-17: REZCIll:N3 AND PU\IiINED UNIT DEVELCll'MENT. CI.E'lELZ\ND AVENllE. .:JaIN ARKELL lcontiDuedl . Elizabeth Modesette of 3743 New Brighton Road cx:mnented she had seen the surveyor out an:i after the surveyor left, she noticed her stakes were missin1. She requested the AWlicant fin:i out m.y the stakes are missin1 an:i have them replaced at the AWlicant's expense. winiecki note::1 the suJ:mission staff I~L from the Fire Marshall to Zonin;J 1\dministrator Iago dated Novanber 4, 1992 relatin1 concerns to sprinklin1 the l:uilding an:i provision of a fire a=ess road aroum the l:uilding . Architect Reese stated that the Fire Marshall had indicated to him that sprinklin1 the entire l:uilding am garages would be sufficient an:i the access road would not be ~~~ry. He stated he will contact the Fire Marshall to discuss this matter am resolve it prior to the council meetirY:J . A resident voiced concern relative to sufficient space for the proposed fire access road aroum the entire l:uilding. 'lbe Architect explained there would be adjustments on the west am south sides an:i the slopes would be leveled out if the road is required. Mr. Bergly stated, at the most the roadway would be 10 feet wide am would be =vered by grass. He note::1 the road would be maintained during the winter nont:hs. 'Ihe resident referred to member Carlson' s original question on soil correction an:i also questioned if the water would run any faster into . the pond. 'Ihe Architect explained that there are no soil corrections needed an:i the runoff from the site will not be worse than current corxlitions . He advised he is not required by storm water regulations to iIrprove the runoff condition on this site, only to maintain it's existin1 corxlitions after construction of the l:uilding. Developer John Arkell spoke about the ptoposed senior housing project an:i highlighted the following items the developnent will provide: price of hames, on-site caretaker, meal program, van/taxi transportation, area hospital visits (Iilysicals, etc.), wellness ~'-'::ll.aI1l. an:i social events. vice C1lair winiecki asked if there were further comments from the floor, hearin1 none, she closed the p.1blic hearing at 8:20 plI. winiecki asked the Applicant if MOC b.ls service would be provided as well as sane type of shelter for residents while they waited for the bus. The Applicant stated that MOC in the past has been helpful in adding a location to their b.ls route. He advised he is not opposed to providing a shelter for residents an:i will contact MOC regarding the route an:i shelter. McGraw questioned if the Engineer reviewed the waterflow an:i if any new area would be considered for drainage, run-off an:i water a=nnulation. Bergly stated the engineer did look at all of the above mentioned items an:i recommends approval from the Rice Creek Watershed District as a . corrlition of recommended approval from camnission. winiecki questioned if each unit would be handicap adaptable. Applicant stated noIlllally all units are rented prior to construction canpletion. p'..nni"')' ~.....i_ion Meeting 4 11-04-92 Cl\SE #92-17: REZC:1mI; AND PLl\!lNED tlmT DE'lELCll'MDlr. CLEVELl\ND AVIHlE. .:JaIN ARXELL (continued) '!he Applicant does not discriminate as to where a hanlicap resident . would like to live, therefore all units are hanlicap adaptable. Carlson moved, seconded by McGraw, to waive the Develcpnent Moratorium Ordinance. All voted in favor. (5-0). i McGraw moved, secon::led by Petersen to Rezone the pIUl=Ly iran R-2 to R-3 upon issuance of a bJildin;J permit for the p1:0p0sed PUD with a density of 6.5 units per a=e as allowed in the proposed Zonin;J Ordinance revisions. All voted in favor. (5-0). Carlson moved, secon::led by McGraw to recommerrl to O::Juncil awroval of Case #92-17, PUD General Development Plan arx:l Final Plan for the Cottage Villas of Arden Hills with conditions A thru G outlined urxler #3 of the Planner's report dated November 4, 1992, arx:l further conditions as follows: 1) the three items listed in the Fire Marshall's memo of November 4, 1992 to Catherine Iage relatin:J to sprinklin:J the bJildin;J arx:l the fire access road; 2) that a b.ls shelter be provided for residents of the c:c:mplex; 3) that a congregate area be established in one of the courtyards in lieu of the area shown in the circular drive; arx:l 4) that the lot stakes be replaced at the residence of Elizabeth Modesette, 3743 New Brighton Rd at the expense of the applicant. All voted in favor. (5-0). Cl\SE #92-19. WAIVER OF JDmTClUUM ClIDI:NlIN:::E: 2020 '1'fI[M IRIVE. OWEN Rl\SMIJSSEN . Planner Bergly referred to his report dated November 4, 1992, arx:l explained that the Applicant is requesting' that the MoratoriUlll Ordinance be waived to allCM him to construct a 24' x 40' (960 sf) garage/storage bJilcli.rq that is allowed un:l.er the present Ordinance. Bergly reviewed the fin:lings listed in his report: 1. The present Ordinance does not limit the size of such aocessory bJildings . 2. The 1-"-~ Ordinance, as revised at a recent Planning Camnission meetin:J, would limit such accessory buildin;Js to a maximum size of 700 sq. ft. 3. The Applicant's lot is located in a small neighbortlood with smaller, lower value homes, many with considerable outdoor storage. 4. '!he Applicant's lot is 20,000 sq. ft., considerably larger than the 11,000 sq. ft. allowed in the R-2 District so the ratio of the garage to the lot will be similar to a starnard lot with a staOOard garage. 5. '!he Applicant's new home is considerably larger than other homes in the neighborhcxxi. '!he larger detached a=essory buildin;J was planned as part of the original development arx:l to be consistent with the existin:J Ordinance. '!he garage is staked out arx:l =ushed rock base is in place as well as a =ushed rock drive next to the house . '!he applicant was unaware of the MoratoriUlll Ordinance . until he applied for a a bJildin;J permit for the garage. 6. '!he proposed garage is needed to house two collector cars (now stored in the attached garage) arx:l miscellaneous material arx:l equipment IlCM stored outdoors. . pl,nminq n.....;..8ion Meeting 5 11-04-92 Cl\SE #92-19: WAIVER OF ~ CIlD:IN1lH::B: 2020 'l'JI[J{ IRIVE. CMEN ~ . 7. '!he proposed garage will help to reduce the I-35 traffic noise ilrpact on the Applicant's backyard. 8. '!he en:i of the structure facing 'lhcm Drive will be a fairly st:.aroard garage width of 24 feet. 'Ihe 40 foot depth will not be evident from 'Ihan Drive. 9. A 30 ft. x 48 ft. (1440 sf) 21 ft. high steel pole blildi:ng is located on the lot immediately west of the subject lot. For ~rison, the proposed structure will be 24 ft. x 40 ft. (960 sf) and 10 ft. high on the eave line. 10. '!he roof of the structure will be the same =lor as the roof an the house, and the exterior walls will be lighter than the house but in a similar =lor. P!armer Bergly reccmnen:ied the follOlo1ing action: 'lhat the waiver of the Moratorium be approved to allOlo1 =nstruction of a garage that would be allCMed umer the existing Ordinance for the reasons stated in the above fi.rrlirYos. winiecki requested the re=rding secretary incorporate into the record, the letter of objection received fran Dana Souther, 2018 'Ihan Drive, dated November 3, 1992. Carol Fischer, =-owner of the property at 2020 'Ihom Drive responded to the letter from Souther by advising Canunission of several neighborhood . disputes with this person. Fischer noted that the letter did not appear to be objecting to the garage, but objecting to the overall developnent of this site. Zoning Administrator advised Canunission that aocecsory blildi:ng IIIUSt be setback 10 feet fram the rear property line and 5 feet fram the side property line in an R-2 district. She noted the plan showed the setbacks reversed and asked the Applicant if these requirements could be met for placement of the structure. OWen Rasl\IUSSeI1 agreed to place the structure 10 feet fram both the rear and side property lines. Petersen moved, seconied by Piotrowski, to recornmerxi to Council approval of Case #92-19, Waiver of the Development Moratorium Ordinance to allow =nstruction of a garage umer the existing Ordinance based on the reasons outlined in the Planner's report dated 11/4/92. Motion passed. (4-1). (Petersen, Piotrowski, McGraw and Carlson voting in favor; winiecki opposed). Cl\SE #92-20. SIDE Y1lRD Sm'BlICK VARI1lR::E Pm IJIiELLIlI; EXPANSICfi. 1727 CIIM'ImM AVENllE. RICK AND SHmlILDl JmNSCfi Planner Bergly referred to his report of November 4, 1992, and explained the Applicant is requesting a variance fran the required 10 foot side yard in the R-1 District to allow the dwelling to be expanded to be . within 6 feet of the lot line. A 4 foot side yard variance is therefore required. - - - --.----. -...-- . pl ,n..,i ng '"" .....i ..sian Heet:iJlq 6 11-04-92 Cl\SE #92-20. SIDE YARD IlEl'Ill\CK VARD\K::E Fell. DWELI.IH; EXPANSICIl. 1727 aIATm\M AVENUE. RICK 1\ND SllERILYN JmNSCIl Bergly reviewed the f:in:tin;Js listed in his l.~ 1:.: . 1. '!he lot is tapered, therefore the house is not parallel with the side lot lines. '!he house has a 6 foot jog in the west wall so that no portion of the dwelliIx1 would be nearer than 10 feet to the west lot line. 2. '!he house iJnmediately to the west has an identical jog. It appears that it has been exparrled to the rear to avoid encroachment on the side yard. 3. Extentin:.J the dwelliIx1 4 feet to the west would encroadl on the side yard that is nearest to an entirely glass wWow-wall and an open deck on the house to the west. 4. It appears that the house could be exparrled to the rear and avoid the side yard encroachment. However, without know'iIx1 the interi= layout of the rooms in the house, the Planner cannot recammend this awroach. 5. '!he harrlwritten dimensions on the plan do not correspond with the Certificate of SUrvey d:i1nensions so the exact position of the house is not known and the requested variance may not be exactly four feet. 6. It appears that the site con:titions are not unique to this property. 'lbere are a rn.unber of unusually configured lots in this subdivision and throughout the City. Plarmer Bergly recommended the followiIx1 actions: . 1. '!hat the request f= a variance be denied. 2. '!hat the followiIx1 considerations be attached to the action as rationale for denial: a. '!hat the shape of the lot = the terrain does not prohibit reasonable use of the property. 'lbere are numerous other lots in the iJnmediate vicinity with similar lot configuration. b. '!he =iginal house was designed in a manner to avoid side lot encroachment, as were many others in the subdivision. c. '!here appears to be a possibility of ~ion to the rear that could be done without a variance. McGraw stated that to grant a variance the Applicant is required to show hardship. He asked the applicant if there is an identifiable hardship. . 'lhe Applicant stated they did not need a 4 foot variance for the entire length of the ilrprovement area, only a p:>rtion of the area, due to the shape of the lot. The Applicant stated there would be no windows facing the neighbor and the neighbor had no objection to the construction plan. Mr:Q:aw IlIOVed, seconded by Erickson, to deny the r~est f= a variance, f= the reasons outlined in the Planner's report and that no hardship exists. All voted in favor. (5-0). . . plAnninq OaImission Meeting 7 11,-04-92 DISCUSSICIf: 0ImR PLMlNDC :rssum . 1- Prooosed sicm Ordinance Camnission decided to defer this discussion until the next meetin;J since 2 nv>mhlo..rs are absent. CXXJN:::IL REPCRT Deputy Clerk, Iago .L~ted on pl.ann:in:J iteDs of interest to Camnission. She informed the Ccmnission that the Referenium for a new Public Works/Parks & Recreation facility did not pass an:i the Council members elected are: Paul Malone, Beverly lIplikowski an:i Dale Hicks. She also stated that Councillnember Tan Mahowald would be contactin;J all members an:i asking them if they are interested in servin;J on the Commission after the first of the year. ADJOORN ~w moved, seconde:l by Petersen to adjourn at 9:50 p.m. vioe Clair Jeanne winiecki . . e.. :! ~. ::,.(.:~.{~:~ /~"~"-'tJ..;- r - ....... . ,CIi ;,;..0 ""n-, >.- . ".-' "'~;J"" '. .<0;.- ~~._ i ~ .,...-., '- " . "'.."" I .. - .~-~-~. / RECbv:i:.u .. ~7 2 8 1992 ,- ..'8' Minnesota Department of Transportation Metropolitan District Transportation Building .~OF~ St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 Oakdale Office, 3485 Hadley Avenue North, Oakdale, Minnesota 55128 Golden Valley Office, 2055 North Lilac Drive, Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422 Reply to OakdaIe Office 779-1210 October 23, 1992 Telephone No, Thomas R. Sather, Mayor City of Arden Hills 1450 West Highway 96 Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112 Re: TH 51 near Lydia and Snelling Avenue (C.S. 6216) Dear Mayor Sather: Thank-you for your letter of September 22, 1992 concerning the intersection of Snelling Avenue and TH 51. I am sorry that the City feels there was inadequate opportunity to participate in the decision to close the median in the above-mentioned area. MnlDOT greatly values public participation in the decision-making process and we feel that adequate opportunity was afforded . in this case. The decision to close the median as-is cannot be revisited, Closing the median was necessary because of the number and severity of accidents occurring, To reopen the median would represent a significant public danger, a more significant danger than what results from rerouting traffic onto lower speed local streets, Reopening the median would also expose Mn/DOT to liability lawsuits. Closing the median was agreed to as a first step until such time as alternatives could be explored and a mutually acceptable solution developed. As we have stated, Mn/DOT is willing and able to work with the city to explore and develop alternatives for convenient and safe access to the neighborhoods in this area, We strongly desire to move forward and make progress in meeting your needs, Please have the chair of your Public Safety and Public Works Advisory Committee schedule a meeting. I suggest that you invite the city engineer and a representative from Ramsey County, as most alternatives involve roadways under county jurisdiction. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 779-1210. Sincerely, ;/,I 1K::t 'A -c . ... / Tom O'Keefe, P ,E, . Metro Division Planning and Programming ')'()J;!iC1; ~ """ An Equal Opportunity Employer . - . DRAFT . CITY OF ARDEN HILLS 1450 WEST HIGHWAY 96 ARDEN HillS, MN 55112-5794 October 30, 1992 Mr. Tam O'Keefe, P.E. Minnesota Department of TranspOrtation 3485 Hadley Avenue North oakdale, MN 55128 SUBJEX::I' : T.R. 51 Near Lydia ani Snelling Avenue (C.S. 6216) Dear Mr. O'Keefe: 'Ihe City of Arden Hills has received your 10-23-92 letter regarding the closing of the T.R. 51 intersection near Lydia ani Snelling Avenue. 'Ihe City wishes to continue di',rl1ssions regarding alternative access points for the residents affectErl by this closure. Possible alternatives include a frontage road to Lydia. Please advise as soon as possible. If you have any questions, please . contact me at 633-5676. Sincerely, Dorothy A. Person city Administrator OAF Its . PHONE: 16121 633-5676 . FAX 16121 633-7839 CITY OF ARDEN BILIB . MEHEANOOM D1lTE: NOvEIDber 9, 1992 TO: cathy IagO, Deputy Clerkf'llnnh.g Mministrator FIlCH: Dan Winkel, Assistant Fire Marshall j) rf.1,J . stlBJ!Xl'l' : Review of tbe Final PlaIIs for. the ''Cottage Villa" Devel ~1?'".,"'t Fire Marshall Mike ZUstiak am JllY5elf have n; """'lSs'=<'l the proposed final plans for the "Cottage Villa" development. last week Mr. Zustiak did firrl out fram the developer that the entire ccmplex will have a fire suppression sprinkler system installed. 'lherefore, we feel that it is not necessary to have the 1-'LUJ:."--.sed fire C'~s road blllt surrounding the complex. '!he hydrant l=ations will also be reviewed with the developer prior to the installation of the water main extension for the project. DAW:rk . . ~ 1/o?!9~ CITY OF ARDEN HILLS . MEHJIU\NOOM D1lTE : November 9, 1992 ro: Dorothy A. PerSOD, City Mninistrator FRCH: David W. Kriesel, Building Inspector stlIlJB!l': Remodeling Valuation at 1178 Benton way On November 2, 1992, Mr. Scott larson, 1178 Benton Way, applied for a Building Pennit (#4644), showing an estimated value of $1,400.00. Upon review of the suhnitted plans, I found the value for permit to be $26,113.05. My review of the original building plans showed that the lower level met the requirements of a story and not as a basement. '!his required me to value the improvement at $31. 05 a square foot. ('!he valuation deducted the square footage cost of the basement to a story $44.98 - $13.93 = $31. 05.) '!his valuation was met by opposition from Mr. Larson. On subsequent meeting between Mr. larson and the City Administrator, Mr. . larson has raised the value from $1,400.00, to $6,000.00 and finally to $9,000.00 to include additional costs and labor. Although my valuations have been found to be realistic in prior cases, I requested that Mr. larson obtain three separate bids form legitimate contractors to find a reasonable value of the construction. '!his again was met by opposition from Mr. larson and this is his reason for appearing before you. '!he valuation sheets used are provided by the state of Minnesota and the International Conference of Building Officials. '!he square footage valuations have been decreasing, causing me to use the most cu=ent and lowest square footage costs. rMK: lav . .~ 11#'1 lid- . .-. , , .' CITY OF ARDEN HILLS . M:EM:mlNDUM TO: ~ Person, city ~strator FRCM: Illcr'E : 1/ - 9 -9""2- SUBJD::T: City council Foll~ fran Cotmeil Meeting of // - 92- Please review the items below and discuss with me any questions or comments you may have. I, ~ ,.. /~ ~a#~ ~~.~~ ~~/~ . ~.' 4' '~:;z:~ ~ M ' ~ -} /Jq,.o. ~ ~,~ - ~/2f2;:~-7~ ~ . ;G~~ ~. ~~X- .' ?~ ~-~ ~~ -y~~\ rxJ .~ ctfd/ uy~ ~. . (~.e- d #a..q) 3, -, ~~~'~~ ~, .' . (~ sut4u - J p)/ A >><<-- '?;~\. ~v~ / t . ~, ~, 8 ~ -~CJ~O ~~ ~L ' ,.t'~~ ~ ' ~ . OAF Its ~~_ ~-" ~obtLb(~~ . d!-e-.~ ~ ~ ~ . ~, . - .. . CITY OF ARDEN HILlS MEKIlANDUM TO: ~v-e ~ FRCM: Do=t:hy A. Person, city 1\dmini.strator Dl\TE: SUBJECT: City. COUncil Followup fran COUncil Meetmg of / / - '1 Please review the items below and di ' conunents you nay have. scuss Wlth me any questions or ~ ~, &w~(/ ~4~-e/~. ~ ! '; 'I I ~ ~.AZ~";~ ~~~ r . c~ -~~h~ . PJIL<" g,~Z;;,c . ' ) /, ( . /?. "/ ,J /nJJ-U/X~~ rv C::~I#? ~ ~/Z.f2/7N-cJdi.J?~-d ' - tu~~ ff~ ~~ ~~~~~ S~~.~~~' ~~(S) p)' ~/ ~ db-;a:~(y~ I;' ~ , jJL CJ~ /.ftJ-d1f ~ c;:~ CZ/ /?~ ~ ftWLlr"~~?j#~C /21 a ,J:o r ~ ad---AQ c.-~~ " /,;J./lYcP Y-- N~/zm<-c1/7LdZ~d ~ ~ ' b: .. -c/1.~. . ru/L-/J-#'-~~' i DAP Its ',' .- '.--. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS . MEM::RANOOM TO: Tt~ , FRa!:: Dorothy A. Person, City .l\dministrator mTE: //-7'- 9z- SUBJEX::T : City COUncil Followup fran COUncil Meeting of 1/- '9 - ? 2- Please review the items below and discuss with me any questions or C01lIll1e11ts you may have. // ~~~~ ~kc~.E Ok ,;2, ,P(1~c~O'-c . . nAP Its '- . . \' CITY OF ARDEN HILlS .~~ . MEMEANDUM TO: TS , - - FRCM: Dorothy A. Person, City Mministrator DATE: // -9- 92-- SUBJEX:T: City Council Followup f~ Council Meeting of // _ 9 2- Please review the items below and discuss with me any questions or conunents you may have. ~O/C~ ~ II Lt, k , -~'~cd-~</ "~;j ~~'~~ . c2. - O~ /CJ-,;!0~/Z:~ . -"du /'/-9"~:7 /)7~ UJ6~ ~ - "'/VC2<? ~~~~? ~ 3. &;#-L/cL ~~~ ..-- - ~Yl &~~~-e:~ ~d~ ~ ~.bL/ ~ g .j -f:! if ~U~ , ~: t l ?0 2 ~ ! . DAP Its " :" . I MINUTES CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING october 26, 1992 7:30 P.M. - City Hall CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Sather called to order the regular City Council meeting at 7:30 p,m, Present: Mayor Thomas Sather; Councilmembers JoAnn Growe, Thomas Mahowald, Paul Malone, Absent: Dale Hicks, Also present were: Parks Director, John Buckley; Clerk Administrator, Dorothy Person; and Recording Secretary, Shar Foster, APP~ECIATION OF FLOWER POWER VOLUNTEERS Parks Director Buckley and Flower Power Representative David Sand explained that the "Gateway Gardens" project has been done for four to five years with the help of volunteers who I plant and maintain ten City flower gardens throughout the community, They offered thanks and appreciation pins and certificates, on behalf of the citizens of the City, to all participating individuals or families listed below, Several of the participants were present to receive acknowledgment, The Council and audience applauded all the volunteers. David Sand Jean & Maxine Mootz Jan & Don Messerly Bill & Mary Gillies Faye Haugen Kathy and Tom Goserud Terry Post Renee Kaulfuss Megan & Larry Ricke Patsy & Rick Morphew Susan Ingeman Will Sulzbach & Scout Troop 200 Vivian straumann Mary Flor Cathy Olmscheid Carol & Jerry Moehnke Elaine smith Carol Cafferty ADOPT AGENDA MOTION: Mahowald moved, seconded by Growe, to adopt the October 26, 1992 agenda as presented, Motion carried unanimously (4-0). APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MINUTES , MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Growe, to approve the minutes of the October 13, 1992 Regular Council Meeting as prepared, Motion carried unanimously (4-0), _.~.- I Arden Hills Council 2 October 26, 1992 CONSENT CALEN~AR Councilmember Malone asked for further clarification on Consent Calendar items a, c, d, and e. With regard to item a, Councilmember Malone stated that his understanding of proposed Resolution 92-67 is that it requests the Commissioner of Transportation change the MSA formula in anticipation of potential transferring of jurisdiction over roadway segments from Ramsey County to municipal i ties, He asked if there is any information known as to which roads may be involved in this transfer. Administrator Person stated that informal recommendations have been made, but no formal decisions have yet been made. she added that several local communities are joining together in adopting this type of resolution. With regard to item c, Councilmember Malone asked if it is known why Ramsey County Sheriff's Office has unexpended squad funds available, Administrator Person stated their budget designated a certain amount for replacement of squad , cars, those vehicles were purchased under budget due to a joint purchasing arrangement, therefore authorization to use the remaining funds to purchase emergency equipment such as squad light bars is being requested, Malone stated there is a specific vehicle assigned to the City of Arden Hills and he questioned whether Arden Hills' portion of budget will be spent on outf i t ting the Arden Hills' squad, Person answered yes, that was her understanding, with regard to items d and e, Councilmember Malone stated he assumes the I-ton trucks for the Public Works Department are just chassis, and he is concerned how Public Works expenditures will compare to budget. Administrator Person, referring to a memo from the Public Works Department, stated these are I-ton chassis with specifications for dump box, plow, and salt/sand spreader to be added to each vehicle, Parks Director Buckley said he believes the cost of the one- ton trucks are offset by the rodder equipment on a trailer mount rather than a new chassis mount, MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Mahowald to approve the Consent Calendar and authorize execution of all necessary documents contained therein, Motion carried unanimously (4-0), I a, Adopt Resolution No, 92-67 Approving the Joint Venture of County and Local Municipalities for Committee Investigating and Reporting of Consolidation of Services. b. Adopt Proclamation Declaring the Week of November 8 through November 14, 1992 as "Values Week", ------------- -- I Arden Hills Council 3 October 26, 1992 c, Approve Ramsey County Sheriff's Department Use of Unexpended Squad Funds to Purchase Emergency Equipment During the 1992 Budget Year. d, Approve Purchase of Public Works I-Ton Trucks (2) . e, Approve Purchase of Parks & Recreation 3/4-Ton Pickup Truck, f, Approve Administrative Policy on False Alarm Procedures. g, Approve City Hall Site Designation as a Santa Anonymous Drop-off Site for 1992, h, Approve Solicitation Request from Minnesota Public Lobby (Minneapolis Park Lovers). i , Approve List of Claims/Payroll, PUBLIC CO~ENTS There were no public comments, UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS There are no agenda items under this heading, I C;:,Q_UNC U!_q9_~ENTp' EL~CT.L~_CANVASS INQ Administrator Person reported that Deputy Clerk Iago has requested the council schedule a time for canvassing election results, and has suggested November 4, 1992, MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Growe, to schedule a special Council meeting to canvass election results on November 4, 1992 at 5 p,m, Motion carried unanimously (4-0) , CITY HALL REFERENDUM Administrator Person stated that Council has been provided with the latest updates with regard to the City Hall referendum issue, She reported that a few phone calls have been received with regard to this matter as the information has been dispersed throughout the community, She stated that the types of comments received urge Council to be as conservative as possible, advise that other Public Works facilities may be available, and question where is the best and most cost-effective site for the facilities. I KEITHSON POND UPDATE Administrator Person reported that Keithson Pond work is expected to be completed within two days working time. Councilmember Malone commented that it appears Keithson Pond work is coming along very nicely. . , I Arden Hills Council 4 October 26, 1992 F~NANCE COMMITTEE Councilmember Malone recalled a recent Finance Committee report provided to Council and asked if Council had any feedback/input they would like to forward to the Finance Committee, particularly with regard to that report, Mayor Sather commented that the report was very easy to read and the presentation of information was very well done, Malone advised that the Finance Committee will be researching the matter of a storm water utility and will be reporting on this matter in the near future, Councilmember Mahowald asked if there will be a meeting to discuss storm water utility. Malone said it can probably be dealt with at a worksession, Administrator Person stated that Maier Stewart and Associates is compiling information with regard to storm water utilities in other communities, but it may be unrealistic to anticipate the storm water utility to be in place by January 1993, MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Mahowald, to schedule a I Council worksession on Monday, November 16, 1992 at 4:30 p,m. Motion carried unanimously (4-0), ADJOURN MOTI9N: Malone moved, seconded by Growe, to adjourn the meeting at 7:52 p,m, Motion carried unanimously (4-0) . ,q' ~/" ,'?{.::: -----i /i. '! ,I (il ! iJ~ ) \.....'11./ ~.-- ',u~'1v.,q-', "v'\\'!,i~ i ,i' 1 1)'. Administrator Thomas R, Sather, Mayor NOTICE OF MEETINGS: City Hall Referendum information meeting will be held October 29, 1992 at 6:00 and 7:30 p,m, The next regular council meeting will be held November 9, 1992 at 7:30 p,m, at City Hall, The next Council worksession will be held November 16, 1992 at 4:30 p,m, , ,,. " .~ . CITY OF ARDEN HILLS _ __ J I MEM>>lANDUM ~ 'S;=> TO: IS FRCM: noro_ thy A. Person, city Mministrator _ i j' DM'E: // - 9 - 9 2-- II 1c ~: City, COUncil Followup f~ council fl_ ~ cl" ; Meetmg of // - 7' -'7 2- [)J) (/V~ i Please review the items helCM and discuss with me any questions or comments you may have. '. ~, ~-(/tl~y<-f 4&-,.J1 0 /C ~ J I ( ~~-r::A...< - 4c::-&( a-P C:Z/-...<<;K/I. 1<, --'~'- _. /,' ~-r\\,~IOlLl''-'-'I N)X2C~1;t~ ~;ert:s=~~ . c;:z, /0 ~0~~1P~7 , -~ //-'0~-~ /)~JW~ ~k;~ ~ - 0aa '/~~2"~? , ~- 3, .riSU</L-C. /-~_C~'7 ~~"p7 :::::- . , . ~_. - '../;/ CJ' ,e~'<:7 /-7.-41'/ "J'UL,yJiA!.D. e,.), ,'_ , _ ~ V ~:d~ ,- c:fl--CL----<':-/ -~ ~ o j~<7:Y~~;~: N -- I Jef0 5/< ~.e - :;el/YK-C iY~~ '>Z<-d~ '''___ , i . : DAP Its l ;f, , , ~ Idj ~ ~ G O*e ' . ARDEN HILLS NEWSLETIER Codt\y $ ~ ~ v" November 13, 1992 ~fr~ - 1. ADMINISTRATION - A. Economic Develooment - Ramsey County and cities are exploring a County-wide economic development plan. This wonld be financed through adding a percentage (5-10 percent) to any TIF since 1990. Arden Hills has expressed concern regarding need, taxpayer impact, and administration/governing body of such a plan. They are meeting November 20 to receive input regarding cities desiring to participate. B. Winter Cilv & Recreation Newsletters: Newsletters will be mailed 10 citizens during the week of November 16. 2. PUBLIC WORKS - A. Water Samoles ReQuest _ Additional sites are needed for testing of copper and lead content. Following a review of the homes most likely to have these chemicals, homeowners will be asked 10 volunteer due to limited home type and age. 3. FINANCE - A. Fire Deoartment - The Fire Department decreased their 1993 budget by $10,000. Further 1992 bodget changes will be ' reviewed at Monday's Worksession. 4. UPCOMING COUNCIL ITEMS - A. November 23. T.H. 51 CrossiUl! - Need for alternatives - Committee Discussion: Possible MeetiUl!. 3:00 or 7:00 om , B. November 24. Parks & Rec Committee. 7:30 om C. November 30. Council Stratel!V Session - Union Ne20tiations. 6:00 om D. November 30. Re2Ular Council Meetin2. 7:30 om: 1) Truth in Taxation Hearing - Attached is a proposed ontline for review. . E. December 2. Joint Council and Plannin2 Conunission. 6:00 om - Proposed Zoning Ordinance, (Sign Ordinance review at regular Planning Commission Meeting). F. December 14. Re2Ular Council Meetiml. 7:30 om G. December 16. Finance Committee. 7:30 om W D~t'~m1x-r 17 Pv\?lie ~ale~:.~1.18Fks Cemmittvv :'JU BRI. I. December 21. Worksession Meetinl!. 5:00 om: 1) Citizens Committee will meet with City 10 consider options for City Ha1VPublic Works facilities. (See two related items attached). 2) Pavement Management Study review - Engineer Terry Maurer., 3) Review of Committee appointments (citizens) for 1993. , J. December 28. Re2Ular Council MeetiUl!. 7:30 urn K. Possible future worksession items: 1) Sheriffs Department issues. Requests from a trailer court to designate an ordinance for law enforcement purposes. 2) Overnight parking ordinance. Discussion is needed to clarify whether this ordinance will be redone or 10 readvise the Sheriff to enforce the ordinance within the City limits. .