Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCCP 11-16-1992 , . ~ . ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS MONDAY, NOVEMBER 16, 1992, 4:30 P.M. 25 --. 1. CALL TO ORDERJROLL CALL. 4:30 P.M. 2. AGENDA ADOPTION. 3. APPROVAL OF NOVEMBER 4 SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES. 4. DISCUSSION OF STORM WATER UTILITY OPTIONS. ;j/ A. OPTIONS AND LEGAL IMPLICATION - AlTORNEY FILLA. B. IDENTIFY POTENTIAL PROJECTS AND COSTS, EFFECT OF FUTURE DEVELOPMENT, ENGINEER TERRY MAURER AND PLANNER JOHN BERGLY. C. IMPLEMENTATION ITEMS AND TIMELINES. . 5. DISCUSSION OF INDEPENDENT CONTRACfORS, SERVICES AND COSTS FOR 1993. 6. 1992 BUDGET UPDATE. 7. PARKS AND RECREATION - REVIEW OF POSSIBLE ACTIVITIES FOR ARDEN HILLS 1993 WINTER FESTIVAL AND BUDGET IMPLICATIONS. 8. APPROVE SIGNING OF CONTRACT FOR SERVICES FOR CITY HALL CLEANING - COVERALL AT $30.00 PER WEEK. THE BUDGET IS BASED ON $35.00 PER WEEK. 9. UPDATE ON TURNERS CHARITABLE GAMBLING - MAYOR SATHER. 10. COUNCIL COMMENTS. . 11. ADJOURN. ... ' MINUTES . CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 4, 1992 5:00 p.m. - CITY HALL CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Sather called to order the Special City Council meeting at 5:00 p.m. The roll being called, the following members were present: Mayor Sather, Councilmembers JoAnn Growe, Thomas Mahowald, and Paul Malone. Absent was Councilmember Dale Hicks. Also present were: Clerk Administrator, Dorothy Person and Deputy Clerk, catherine Iago and Councilmember Elect Beverly Aplikowski. Malone moved, seconded by Growe, to adopt the agenda. Motion carried unanimously (4-0). CANVASS ELECTION Moved by Malone, seconded by Growe, that Council certify canvass of the November 3, 1992, Election as submitted declaring Beverly Aplikowski and Paul L. Malone as Councilmembers for a four year term, and Dale R. Hicks as Councilmember for the two year unexpired term. Motion carried unanimously (4-0). . SCHEDULE MEETING Malone moved, seconded by Growe to schedule a meeting on November 30 at 6:00 p.m. regarding Union negotiations. This meeting will be a closed session. Motion carried unanimously. (4-0). ADJOURN Moved by Malone seconded by Growe, that the meting be adjourned at 5:10 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. (4' 0). ~?~d~~ Dor6 hy A. PeT\,on Thomas city AdministUator Mayor . , . CANVASS OF 1992 CITY ELECTION CITY OF ARDEN HILLS WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 1992, 5:00 P.M. - CITY HALL At the City election of the City of Arden Hills, Ramsey County, Minnesota, held at the city of Arden Hills Precincts 1, 2, 3, and 4, being the places it was directed to be held by the City Council, after giving due notice thereof as provided by law on the 3rd day of November 1992, the election boards, being qualified voters of said City to act as judges of such election and each took and subscribed an oath to faithfully discharge the duties required of them at such election. Said qualified and trained judges opened the polls by proclamation, and the election proceeded by ballots without adjournment or intermission until closed. The subjects voted on at such election, as stated in the Notice, were: To elect two councilmembers for four year terms. To elect on Councilmember for a two year unexpired term. To vote on Proposition 1, Shall the City of Arden Hills be authorized to issue General obligation Bonds in the amount of 2.8 million dollars for construction of a new Public Works/Maintenance Facility. At 8:00 P.M. on November 3, 1992, the polls were closed. The judges then publicly counted and canvassed the votes, and a true statement was proclaimed to the voters by the Clerk Administrator, who recorded the . same in the City Minute book. STATEMENT OF RESULTS OF CANVASS The following is a true statement of the counting and canvass of votes by ballot at the Arden Hills City election, Ramsey County, Minnesota, held Tuesday, November 3, 1992, as proclaimed to the voters by the election judges: Beverly Aplikowski received 2131 votes for Councilmember Paul L. Malone received 2069 votes for Councilmember Thomas A. Mahowald received 1821 votes for Councilmember Freddie Shutten received 1299 votes for Councilmember Write-ins received 47 votes for Councilmember Dale R. Hicks received 2334 votes for Councilmember Eugene A. Richter 1614 votes for Councilmember Write-ins received votes for Councilmember Proposition 1 received 2546 votes for NO Proposition 1 received 2378 votes for YES Beverly Aplikowski and Paul L. Malone were declared elected councilmembers for two four year terms. Dale R. Hicks was declared elected Councilmember for a two year unexpired term. . proposition 1 failed with a majority of negative votes. 1 , . ';f.r,IEFAL fl.EC1ION 1 '3C;,~ .._..._u__ ____ ____.. .,,_.._ _______...___ _____> 1'; ITY (,.-FICtS ARj)~'N HII.LS 't "leAl< TERM .VOTE HiR UP TO TWOl PCT. 1 PCT. 2 PCT. 3 PCT. 4 TOTAL _____m_._ ..--..- -----.-. _ ...._______________1 --._______1 ..-----..-- 1 ---.------ 1 --------- 1 ------..-- BEVERLY APUKOWSK I 1 340 I 529 I 547 I 715 I 2131 ------------_........_---------------1---------1---------1---------1---------1--------- PAUL L. MALONE 1 332 I 512 I 484 1 741 1 2069 -----------_.._.._-----------------1---------1---------1---------1---------1--------- THOMAS A. MAHOLWALD 1 i.~94 I 497 1 389 1 641 1 1821 ----- -------.".- -- -- -----_.._--------1---------1---------1---------1---------I --------- FREDDIE SCHUlTEN 1 211 1 303 , 278 I 507 1 1299 -----------------------------..-..-1..--------1---------1---------1---------1--------- WRITE-INS 1 3 1 11 1 26 I 7 1 47 ---..-------....--..-----..-----------..1---------1---------1---------1---------1--------- COUNCILMENBER ARDEN HILLS 2 YR UNEXPIRED TERM (VOTE FOR ONE) 1 PCT. I I peT. 2 1 PCT. 3 1 PCT. 4 1 TOTAL -------------_.._-------------..---1---------1---------1---------1---------1--------- DALE R. HICKS 1 403 I 578 I 580 1 773 1 2334 -..----,,--. ----".--..- ----..--.. ---------1-----..---1..---....---1------.----1---------1-:-------- EUGENE A. RICHTER 1 242 I 424 I 328 1 620 1 1614 ____._______.._____________._____."._________1__________1_ ________1_________1_________1__________ WRITE-INS 1 5 I 10 I 19 1 '3 1 43 ______.______________________________.1_________.-1_________-1---------1---------1---------- PROPOSllION 1: CITY OF ARDEN Hll.LS .--------------------------------- SHALL THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS BE AUTHORIZED TO ISSUE GENERAL UBLIGATION BONDS IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED 2.8 MILLION DOLLARS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW PUBLIC WORKS/MAINT. FACILITY PCT. 1 peT. 2 PCT. 3 PCT. 4 TOTAL -------._--------------------------1---------1---------1-..-------1---------1--------- YES I 349 I 650 I 542 I 837 1 2378 _______.m_ --- ________________________1_________1_________1_________1 _________1_________ NO I 437 I 585 I 641 1 883 I 2546 --.....-..----- ---_._-----------------1---------1---------1 --- -------1 - ---------1--------- PCT. 1 PCT. "2 PCT. 3 PCT. 4 TOTAL _________ _________ _________ .~,________ ______u__ NUj'lBER VOTING 856 1401 14~~4 1819 5500 REGISTERED PRIOR TO ELEC. 940 1560 1632 2046 6178 REGISTERED ON ELECTION DAY 113 1% 471 319 1099 .---------------------------------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- TOTAL RU; J S IE RE[, 1053 1756 2103 2365 7277 PERCENT VOTIN.., 8L29-.{ 79.78:( 67.71:( 76.91:( 75.58j{ . ~~~/.~ (tI~,~~'2 ?l /l11JI/Ik ~~~ 't" · - - . / ~36r- -tz MJ- 30 V ~ ~ ~~ -c:J iiJ. ~ wi (fdJimw.A;... · ~ ~~,- ~~ ~ -~ ~- . 3-~~~ . ~dJ--o/iz...t1~~~ - ~r) ~~ -JJwfrdk /~ eL /2 (?-~ .~ tnU- r r~df>S~~ - - ~-~- . ~- cd3r /IJHii.;~ 4Jiij;t - . ~-~j~ . -~~If .~~~~~- ~- ~k ~ ~ 1St;it ff/hf- ft, ~ - -- ----- - @ . YI/JJJxL -:= ~ ~~~ ~ ~ !It- ~ ~ oJ ~'J.. ()/...~- 5DI ~~~ -C'il ~tJ,Ml . . -- --- .....--------------- ---- ---- ~ -.- --------------- - -- - -- 1/JIL- ~~~~@ . .1o:L i1 ~~e-t/$ uJl - rh - 1Ji~ -~~ "ft1t-~-Ju ,d~- ~ - ttI~ /.de M&t-~~- JM;/~~~v-~~ 1ip4 - je,;~O-/?~ . ~~dt r~-~",.,;;(!<."9 - @!-~ ~ :r~~<?~J -;r ~HltH ~ - ~~Y8 tI.a/ If/wvf~?~- -- ~ /lHh-~- ~ -fJaL ~~~~- ty- ~~ ~~.;tJ~- . 1J1Jv-~~- -~l- ~~- ~&-ue ~ - -. - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - -- - - - -- - --- --- . (f) @ . ~ -~~~ ~ ~- ~~ l' c( A-i- -- L-~~ x:L~~~~ . ~tpw J:ij[ - ~~e ~ -~~'fg~ · ~ U4t-;.wtr ~r~ ~ ~5f~-'!lif1 ~ - - - -------------- -- - - -- -- --- --- -- --- - - - -- - - ----- ---- ---- idm- W- @ . - .-:- CIf~ ~dJ 'YUUI6f- ~~ , "7/'1I,t- ~ ~~~-- --F-~ ~ · . fr ~ -<. -,' . 1- ~;', ---., ,..: --~j;;~jVA~h~iI li6-- ;' , / ''',. .1);., '- --,/s/..ift ~?'/x.,'tr: - Ii - V /0) ----- ) // .,/,;J',(/ ,'./t --' ( , ' IIC:'<';('/ ' ' ~ .____ " ',._."}<,.., ':: " ( c...).l.. " .' ,- /", ("/~J~'>'~//~"'" -<I' -i ,! c::.> () ,/ <"'\ . ...,. 3..r, re'" 'v' t' .,,; J....." L .' ' " ....; -', ,/;\.. ,U {''''/nJ , ;?,r:'...r~X.. ' ,- ........".li./.;.~..." ,:/"/;/'<:.,c-....-,.,(';._"-_/ / / . T'} -';_ /t~ t,l/;;;yl,l/fJ;Zrj'j' ~,---7'I,,17 ,.._~... i,iil' / i/;Vr'lc! . //Y./J..if. , . ~- /. .~ , . 't':) ,i/" . ,',~) , / . ' .. . ".t. ' , I}..'" ~A < ~. ~ ;' I/' " .- ,,',"" 7,/ ) L-:J'7'2? /. /}:':'II , ~ -?,h ,(.., /,/ ',," . I, /' ./JJ.,/t':t'c' .,,<"-' ( ,/ /' /' ~ jfi/ r c;iI: ' . (/'" LIlt>'.,. ~~" .;- '--"" I ,/ <'" ,/.~ '(!-r'- " "../~,j_"c . ) "./;7/ /0" I'"'' rl<A...~ I ~'n' ',' ....-,'" , t,. ,h .", f I t' "" '...:" .~,,{.,".~ {"""'''i'rl."" .";,f' ~%6' r,,", ,. ,-".,If' -,.-., ~ "/ , "' / /1 '"td ,;;:-,,,,,:J/..,/ . ',,1-', .jC,' - if j I, k-"~-: . ,," ,,:'"~ (~ I <J) .... /",-,.- ///PA "'.II (~7""f:~J ""ff:- v- ( /... /,1' U0 ~~ . /~ " / /; . . /:R./: ... 'IA'(,?,,' ./~/, ),',., ) .~. i.../.;../t,:,'-- ,J r /U"> /,v/6F-", F" . . / ,. 1/ ",' Ii ' ,'" (I, ... "-7: ,,(! ,,) /) A:, ' " .' i' .' .' f' ,J~- .';'.. ._ '_'~"-,'. ,", ." (te!t,r;( cPt.d4.<< \l.:/./"...~.. _~.,.' '------ fi'#1 ,#'}) i/ .;/; t...,., "-;/l~"f,.~,.,"/' /:,,"'- , ~~>tlri (ryY;.~"""'/ iJ. ' " ,:' (.,/" . . 'c" /".'/ /.../ ' .'.." , ,~' ,--"',/l.-//,',#,'~' /,.4<,',_, /_/_ ~_,,"f ,n:; ~;//; ,7', / :,;j,/,-' Ir.~(/ fX4,#./ ,/,'" f.. X",! /lY(f/( . . 1 c", .,.,... ." ".~ I~ "'. ;J " , j/'IA,N' ;.JV:J./)//;/ lL ff ;'4-';11.A,. ------ A..JI?'i/ '''-./f'7"'fL/r (/V r / t...,'. ';V' V-t.;pt t /.,' C./ . . CITY OF ARDEN HILLS MEKIU\NOOM TO: Jerry Filla, city Attorney Terry Maurer, city Enqineer John Berqly, city plAn...... DIm Winkel, Public works SUperiDt.....-.t: Terry Post, city Accountant ~ rago, DEputy Clerk ~yn Drude, Ehlers & 1\sSOC'illtes, IDe. FRCH: Dorothy A. Po........., city Mministrator DATE: Navllmber 4, 1992 stlBJECT: Stcmll water utility pl..nn;ng SeSSion On November 16, 1992, at 4:30 p.m., the city Council an:l staff will meet to ,H="'",, a storm water utility. If you have arrj camnents or infonnation prior to this session, please forward them to me. r also have sanple ordinances from the city of New Brighton an:l Shoreview for your review. DAP Its . -- -~ "-.'-'-".'--"" ue: ~~~ ~~9 '1 , I . . . , ~_. , klh/'/^-.-:/ I ,~'::k4C> ,i .,'", '.r. . Storm Water Utility Fund . ;. ~ f" ~ i ~ I /.., :" .~... .. - ! . . _. ... Brian E. Olson Engineering Intern, city of New Brighton August 10, 1992 -------- <.'.. ... ,; ~.:,]J;. '. - ii . 1 2 1 I . Executive summary The storm water utility fund is flexible for the needs of each community. The main function of this utility is to finance the maintenance and reconstruction of the existing storm sewer system. Assessments for additions to the system will still exist. This maintains a constant city policy in which all benefitted properties pay once for their system. The fees are based on the actual amount of run-off being contributed by each land use zone. The fund requires an estimated $145,000 per year to pay for its intended uses. The quarterly rates are given in the following table. Classification Land Use Quarterly Rates 1 Cemeteries, golf courses $ 1.74/acre 2 Parks $ 5.22/acre , 3 Single family and duplex $ 2.32/lot residential 4 Schools, community center $ 8.71/acre . 5 Multiple family $17. 41/acre residential, churches, governmental buildings I , 6 Commercial, industrial, $34.82/acre r warehouse . I $ O.OO/acre J. 7 Unimproved vacant ; i Charge reductions may be obtained by property owners if they can show that their property has less development than the typical amount determined for each land use zone. Reductions may < also be given for those properties that have facilities which increase water quality and/or decrease the rate of flow of run- , off into the system. i Roseville was the first community to implement this utility ~. in the Minneapolis/st. Paul area. They started this fund in 1984, and since have met with little citizen objection. Since ! 1984, twelve municipalities have decided to use the storm water ;,. utility approach to storm drainage. See Appendix C for a table listing the storm drainage rates for seven of the area If communities. " , Most of the response about the storm water utility fund was .' ~.. positive. The utility fund was viewed as being fair, simple, and ". the correct approach to storm water drainage. If this is the answer to storm drainage, New Brighton has the chance to ease the '; -, pain of reassessing the cost of an aging storm sewer system to those taxpayers which have already paid for their storm sewer ; benefits. I ! :1 ,) I " ... -. ..... "......-... - -....~"-_...,-""~. 3 . Introduction There is not any city in the Minneapolis{st.Paul area that is without a storm sewer system. This may appear obvious, but there are reasons that all cities have them. storm sewer systems protect people, protect property, and improve property value. They also reduce insurance risks, enhance the environment" and provide for safe traffic flow. At times it is very easy to overlook these benefits when they work beneath the surface. With these benefits, there comes a price tag. This cost and how it should be apportioned is the topic of this report. Throughout the past ten years other communities in the Twin Cities area have encountered the problems that New Brighton is now facing. The price of maintaining their storm sewer systems have increased due to a change in the state legislature, due to the increased amount of run-off caused by development of homes, churches and businesses, and due to the replacements of aging inadequate facilities. In 1983, the state legislation was changed to require New Brighton to take greater and costlier actions to protect water quality (see Appendix B). These actions include the development and maintenance of regional and local plans to identify problems with the current storm sewer system. Before New Brighton was developed, the rain would fall and . soak into the ground or naturally flow into the rivers and lakes. When land began to be developed the amount of area that allowed the rain water to absorb was reduced. Now, the ground cannot absorb all of the water so additional run-off is created. Many years ago, the storm sewer system was designed for the current water quantities. with each development, the amount of run-off increases. Now, parts of the existing system may need to be replaced because it cannot handle the increased amount of run- off. The aging process is another important factor to consider. The storm sewer system may need to be replaced simply due to the deterioration of its pipes which decreases its efficiency. Today, these costs are paid for using general tax money - property taxes. Property taxes are based on property value. Each property tax is the property value multiplied by the parcel area. Therefore the concept of using property taxes to finance ." the cost of managing storm run-off is only partially correct. For example, someone with the same amount of run-off may pay more because the property may be near a lake where the property value is high. In addition to this inequity, there are properties, such as schools, churches, etc, that are tax exempt. This represents a problem that neighboring municipalities such as Roseville and Shoreview have answered by introducing a storm water utility fund. . Uses of the storm water utility fund A storm water utility fund is similar to the familiar sanitary sewer utility. In the case of the sanitary sewer, fees for treatment . Similarly, the storm water 4 . drainage fees pay for the collection and management of storm run- off. . The fee that each household or business must pay is based on the amount of run-off each property produces. For example, industrial and commercial lots pay more than single family residential lots. This is justified because they produce more run-off due to an increased amount of impervious surface. In this way, the citizens of New Brighton will pay for the management of their storm water system based on the amount of run-off they produce, rather than the value of their property. CUrrently, nearly fifty percent of the citywide costs of managing storm water are collected through property taxes to single family homeowners. with a storm water utility the share of the costs of these households would be reduced to about thirty percent. Also, an additional ~en percent of total costs would be collected from tax exempt properties that usually pay no property taxes. Under a storm water utility fund, the monies which are collected could be used to: . Maintain existing storm facilities so they will operate properly for longer periods of time. . Replace existing storm facilities that have become unusable over the years due to the deteriorative process. . . Sweep streets so the debris does not enter the system or collect in the catch basins and reduce the efficiency of the system. . Enhance wetlands to increase the water quality and retard - flow. . Develop and maintain a storm drainage master plan that will allow the city to plan for future improvements. . Harvest the weeds and remove sediment in the lakes and ponds of the community to increase the water quality. < Advantages/Disadvantages of the storm water utility fund . There are advantages and disadvantages to every plan. The - advantages of the storm water utility fund are best summarized in an article written by Mr. Charles V. Honchell in the January, 1986 issue of the APWA Reporter. The advantages are: . Fairness - Fees are based on the actual amount of run-off - the homeowner produces. ~ . Dependability - It produces consistent funding and is .. easily projectable. . Dedicated funds - There is no competition for use of these funds from other city activities. , ..__"__"'.__. . ..0."..._"- --...,~ ,. . .' 5 . ,. .. . Unrestrictive use - Funds can be used for any type of administrative, planning, reconstruction, or other use ~.. associated with storm drainage. i i. . Leqal defensibility - More and more special assessment ! projects are being challenged in courts, as benefits are , difficult to allocate for properties on high ground which , drain their water downstream. r" . Tax levy reduction - The tax levy can be lowered by no ( longer funding these activities from tax-supported general funds. Note that the tax levy cap has been lifted in ," 1993, but it may not be permanent. ! i Simplicity and flexibility - Securing city approval, . developing a charge system, explaining to the public, and , . adding an extra line on utility bills are not too difficult, and the fee system is adaptable to local situations. "" The disadvantages of the storm water utility fund are: r' . Income tax reduction - The property taxes of single family I. households can be an itemized income tax deduction. storm water utility charges are not deductible. Therefore, under r'. a storm water utility fund, the actual amount that comes L- out of their pocket could be increased. . Coatly - There will be a cos't to implement the system. [' This will include the time and energy required to evaluate , the typical run-off for each land use zone in the city, l... determine actual fees, and change the billing process to include the extra fee. There will also be an operating cost for this utility. This will include processing . . requests for adjustments and updating charges whenever land is subdivided rezoned or developed. ~- . Resistance to a change from existinq policy - with the conversion to the storm water utility fund there could be I some opposition from the citizens that have recently been L assessed the cost of reconstructing their storm sewer. These people may wait many years before they see any r benefit from this fund, therefore perceiving this program <- as an inequitable system. Ii" n' Determination of the storm drainaqe charqe , Now that the storm water utility fund is introduced, the question is, "How much is this ,going to cost me?" 1" L. 1.. Determine the run-off each parcel. produces. , As mentioned. run-off evaluation will need to be , , completed for use zone. Roseville used the , . ..-..-....-- ...__.._--.- -----.,..._-~...._-- . - .-..- -...-.... 6 . soil Conservation service method for evaluating run-off because it is considered fair and nationally accepted (see Appendix C). For this preliminary study, the calculations from Roseville were used as an estimate dUe to the city's proximity. These figures are given in the following table. Residential Standard 2" Equivalence Land Use Rain Runoff Factor Residential 0.24 1 Multiple Family 0.56 2.5 Commercial 1.24 5 Industrial , 1.24 5 Schools 0.30 1.25 churches/Govt. Bldg. 0.56 2.5 Parks 0.18 0.75 Cemeteries, Golf courses 0.09 0.25 ,- . The residential equivalence factor (REF) is defined as the ratio of the average volume of run-off generated by one acre of a given land use zone to the average run-off generated by one acre of typical single .familr residential land, during a standard one year rainfall event. The REF values in the preceding table were then rounded to the nearest 0.25. 2. Determine the cost of needs which will be funded by this utility. An estimated amount required to finance the uses of the utility was computed. This was done by determining the quantity of undersized pipes in the system identified in 1984 Barr report and then estimating a replacement cost. See Appendix C for a detailed table of the estimation of undersized pipes. In the following table there is a breakdown of the funds required to finance the cost of the needs described on page 4. Currently, most of these needs are being funded by property taxes and/or assessments. Maintaining a storm water master plan and some of the reconstruction costs are presently not funded. These are new needs which the storm water utility fund could pay for. . No.937, city of Roseville ----- .--..----_. ....,....,J , ' 7 . Use. Description Amount ,. Administration/Planning storm Water Master Plan $3,000 Construction Planning $7,000 $10,000 Routine maintenance of Personnel $25,000 pipes, pumps, ditches, Vehicles $10,000 vehicles, etc. Supplies $ 5,000 $40,000 Street sweeping Labor $10,000 Supplies $3,000 Depreciation $7,000 $20,000 Reconstruction of deteriorated pipes, : ponds, and inadequate systems $75,000 Amount required for storm .... water utility $145,000 I I I.. 3. Calculate the storm water utility rates. ,. Based on estimated needs of $145,000 and REFs, the following .. . quarterly storm water utility rates would be required. .:...- storm Wate r Utility Charge s Annual Revenue = $145,000 ; Classification Land Use REF Area REU Quarterly Rates Annual Revenue J 1 Cemeteries, golf courses 0.25 25 acres 6.25 $1.74/acre $174 , 1,_ 2 Parks 0.75 241 acres 180.75 $522/arra $5,035 ,. 3 Single family and duplex - residential 1.00 4837 lots 1612.33. $2.32/lot $44,915 4 Public and private schools, " :l community center 1.25 138 acres 17:2.50 $8.71 lacre $4,805 ;1< 5 Multiple family residential, churches and governmental f bull dings .2,50 281 acres 7Cl3.35 $17.41/arra $19,593 J:., 6 Commercial, industrial, warehouSe 5.00 506 acres 2530.00 . $34.82 lacre $70,478 7 Unimproved Vacant 0.00 396 acres 0.00 $0.00 lacre $0 Totals 5205.18 $145,000 ; ----- --~---_...-._._.._.._- 8 . 4. Determine the range of fees for each land use zone. 'Based on the quarterly drainage rates, the range of fees for each land use zone are given in the following chart. Examples of Charges Description Area(acres) Quarteny Fee Range of Fees 1 Cemeteries. golf courses Smallest: st. Jo hn's Cemetery 3.66 $6.37 Largest: $6.37 - $36.56 Brightwood Hills G.C. 21,00 $36.56 2 Parks Smallest: Vermont Park 2,00 $10.45 Larges1: $10.45-$522.32 Long Lake Park 100.00 $522,32 3 Single family and duplex residential All 1015 0.33 $2.32 $2.32 '4 Public and private schools, community center Smalles1: St John's Parochial 2.00 $17.41 , Largest. . Ironcloie Senior High 30.00 $261.16 $17.41-$261.16 5 MufUple family residential. churches and governmental buildings Smalles1: 2154-2188 Pike Lake Drive 0.24 $4.18 Largest: $4.18-$401,66 Polynesian Village 23.07 $401.66 ! 6 Commercia~ industrial, w6rehouse Smallast: i New Brighton BeaU1y Salon 0.21 $7.31 Large.!: $7.31-$1,218.74 Midwest Asphalt 35,00 $1,218,74 it , 7 Unimproved Vacant All lots 396.00 $0.00 $0.00 " .~ ! .ib l Discussion of Results According to Mr. Dave Kotilinek, city Engineer of North st. Paul, the cost to hire a consulting firm to implement the storm L. water utility fund was approximately $6,000. Since New 's population is twice that of North st. Paul'S, an price to the utility is close to $12,000. , the fund require about 50 hours per _..._---_._~_.._"--- ..~-- 9 . This would include the time required for making corrections to charges due to changes in zoning, development of vacant lots, and credit adjustment requests. The main basis for a storm drainage fee is the zoning and the acreage of the parcel. It was determined that development of single family residential land was similar regardless of parcel size, so a single rate was used. This made the utility easier to calculate and followed the viewpoint of a sanitary sewer utility. It was decided that vacant lots were not to be charged because they did not produce additional run-off due to development. This exemption simplified billing as vacant properties are not sent sewer and water bills. Another exception to the storm water utility fund was the public road right-of- ways. This would be counter productive as they are owned and operated by the city. An increase in the cost of maintenance for these right-of-ways would increase individual property tax. Every parcel has its own set of characteristics that sets itself apart from other parcels in a particular land use zone. Charges may be reduced if the property, owner can show that the parcel has sufficiently less development than typical parcels in that land use zone. It should be noted, however, that charges are subject to an increase as well as a decrease when further investigation is required. Another important element of the storm water utility fund is tho credit system. Roseville has two grounds for receiving . credits (see Appendix A). It was decided that up to 50% of the fee could be reduced by property owners providing benGfits for water quality. Another 25% of the fee could be reduced by those parcels who have slowed the flow of the run-off into the sewer system. The water quality credit (50%) was determined by use of Brune's trap efficiency curve. The flow rate credit (25%) was broken into two potential levels. The first 10% was granted if the peak outflow rate was cut to a 5-year rainfall event for predevelopment conditions. The second 15% was given to those who could reduce their flow rate for a 100-year event. The responsibility of the property owner includes supplying the information necessary to justify a credit. This credit system was essential to citizen approval. Conclusion Throughout my research, I have met both approval and disapproval of the storm water utility fund. The majority of the response supported the concept. There was assurance that this utility is the simplest and fairest way to handle storm drainage billing. According to Mr. Charles v. Honchell, formerly of Roseville, ,.. there was some public opposition to the utility, but this declined dramatically within the first three months following its . implementation. . This was accomplished by mailings, advertisements, 'and publications that educated the citizens of the utility's function. Following this initial phase, citizen complaints' were few and far between. After leaving Roseville, , he this process at Bloomington. there _H~.___. I i '.l (0 ~ ,.~ , , , :1 . was similar citizen interaction. It is important to remember that this utility fund does not completely eliminate assessments due to storm sewer construction. Those areas that have not yet been serviced, will still be assessed the cost of their storm sewer system. The function of this storm water utility fund is to pay for reconstruction of aging, inefficient facilities. In this way the citizens only pay for their system once. In conclusion, the storm water utility fund will help to alleviate the confusion of the assessment procedure. The storm sewer system will be completely maintained and operated with the use of this fund. It will also be much easier to keep track of the storm drainage costs on a yearly basis. With the recent difficulties of Oakwood Drive and Christ The King Church, New Brighton has the chance to start a program that will enable them to be ready for such an event to occur again. There is not a right or wrong way to deal with storm water drainage. Every municipality wants its programs to receive public acceptance. This report has addressed the advantages and disadvantages of a storm water utility fund. It now has to be left to the city council to decide whether the majority of the public response will be acceptance or opposition. . i , ..... !; .... . , --.---- - --.--...------."--.-- ....-.-. . ,..'-...... ---.-. ---'-"'--. r," " ...."-, ,I,.,.,' .! ~ .... ,,' r'" ",' . ~ :.. n I: I' , I. , . . - r . Appendix A: RoseviIle's Utility . . ! ~ Ii [ Contents G ordinance No. 937 _.......... -'" .A-l , city credit Policy...............A-3 r. citi~en credit APp~~cation.... -. .A-6 L Publ~c Works Proceuure.......... .A-8 [ [ [ [., .',. [,... .' '" [." ,le , ....._...__.~ , .... , ~ .., A-I .. (' CITY OF ROSEV~L~~ ORDINANCE NO. .-.:;, * * * * * * * AN ORDINANCE ADDING CHAPTER 74 TO TilE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ESTABLIShING A STO&~ WATER DRAINAGE UTILITY. The City Council of the City of Roseville does hereby ordain: L The City Code of the City of Roseville is amended by addine a new Chapter 74, to read as follows: 74. STORM WATER DRAINAGL UTILITY 74.010. Storm >later Drainaqe Utilit'! Established. The municipal storm sewer system shall be operated as a ~ublic utility pursuant to Minn. Stat. Section 444.075 from which revenues will be derived subject.to the provisions of this . Chapt8r and Minnesota statutes. The storm water drL!inac;e utility will be paLt of the public works depart~ent and under ~. the administration of the public works director. 74.020. Definitions'. (1) Residential e~uivalent factor. (REF) - One (1) REF is deiLned as'the ratLo or the averaae vol~~e of runoff generated by one (I) acre of a gLven land use to the average volume of runoff generated by One (1) acre of typical single family residential land, during a standard One (I) year rainfall event_ '.. 74.030. StorIa \1ater Drainaqe Fe'es. StorIa water c.rai:1age fees for parcels or land shall be determined by multiplying , the REF for a f'arcel's l"nd use. by the parcel's acreaae and -. the,: multiplying the resulting product by the star::! water dr;:nnage rate _ The <li:F values for various land uses areas follows: ":}. ~LrlSSIfIC~TION LAND USES REF ~ 1 Cemeteries, golf courses 0.25 ... "2 Parks ....rith ;>arking facilities 0.75 . J Single Eamil~,- <lnd duplex '. resLdential 1.00 .- - -"~._'~~-'--_.,._-_._- "---'.q-~ ;'~ , ',~" A-21 ." ~ . $ " ( 6 'l . d . 1 i CommerCla I In ustrla , warehouse 5.00 7 Irr.proved vacant as ass igned For the purpose of calculating storm water drainage fees, all . . develo!"ed One family and duplex parcels sr.all be considered to have an acreage of one-third (1/3) acre. 1-1"- ~~-<.., ~~/~, d'" re.Ac- :1~"-<- b-= Tf/3.oo lrr 7#..~...k,- prr tEt"r-......cr"'C.. r 74.040. Credits. The Council may adopt policies recoTh~enc by the public works dire~tor, by resolution, for adjustment of the storm water drainage fee for parcels based upon hydrologic data to be supplied by property owners, which data demonstrate a hydrologic response substantially different from the standar Such adjustments of storm water drainage fees shall not be mac , retroactively. .. 74.050. Exemptions. The following land uses are exempt f: , storm water dralnage fees. f' (a) Public Rights of way. ~.... (b) Vacant, unim;noved land with ground cover. 74.060. Payment of Fee_ Statements for storm water drain, ,( f~e shall be c~mputeQ every three (3) months and invoiced by : flnance department for each account on or about the flfth {stt , day of the month following the quarter. Such statement shall L due on or before the last day of the month in which the stater is mailed. Any prepayment or overpayment of charges shall be I tained by the City and applied against subsequent quarterly ff I 74.070. Recalculation of Fee. If a property owner or persc " responsible for paYlng the storm water drainage fee questions I the correctness of an invoice for such charge, such person ma' ~.. have, the detemina tion of the charge recomputed by writ te,., rec to the public works director made within twelve (12) months CO I, mailing of the invoice in ques tion by the Ci ty. 74.080. Penalty for Late Payment. Each quarterly billing 1 storm water dralnage rees not palO when due shall incur a pen' b charge of ten percent (lO~) of the amount past due. . 74.090. Certi=ication of Past Due Fees on Taxes. Any pas' f due storm water cralnage rees In excess or nlnecy {901 days !". ~ due on October 1 or any year may be certified to the County A for-collection with real estate taxes in the following year D ~. suant to i.linn. Stat. Section 444.075, Subdivision 3. In addi, t', the City shall .)lso have the right to bring a civil action or l , take' ther legal remedies to collect unpaid fees. i . . ~l 1 >1 from and:;~~;1 . . :l! .. . . . , _..__.._ ........._.._____ 0.......___ ,_....-~',;:...:..2~'jii -- ..~. ------_...~_.__.. --.----.-.,--.-.---. . ...._.._.._"_____~__.. _,w '__,:_._._,__'._,_._._~.~" ..__ , ' A-3 . CITY POLICY . (" TITLE ./ Credits and/or adjustments of municipal storm water drainage fees. BACKGROUND STATE~ENT The municipal storm water drainage utility utilizes a fee structur' based on the anticipated relative contribution of storm drainage runoff volumes to the storm water drainage system. A parcels cont. bution is determined by that parcels Slze and its lane use, under principal that more intensively developed land uses typically have larger percentage of impervious surface and contribute a much are~ er volume of water and/Qr sediment/nutrient loadings to the system .It is recogn;i.zed that some parcels, due either to their unlque tope graphic, veqetative, geologic and other characteristics, or the ex: tance and maintenance of onsite stonn drainage control, detention, retention facilities have a hydrologic and sediment/nutrient loadil response substantially different from that or: similarly si:::eci parce of the same land use. To provide for an equitable assessment of storm drainage fees, base .. . on reasonably expected contribution of :: IOt.s and sedi~ent/nutrient~ provisions need to be made to permit adjust::1ents or cre6its to the storr:1 drainage fees for those parcels with unlsue or unusual char2.( . teristics. ( , POLICY STATE:-!ENT The basis of the City of Roseville's sto~ water drai::ace fees lS . , ; anticipated relative contribution of st.orr.1 Hater volur.:es and sedi.;::( , , nutrient loadings.to the storm drainage system from a c;,,-ven t'arcel l-lhere unJ.C;:ue or unusual conditions exist where the actual contribu- I tions of water volume sediment/nutrient loadings from a and glven " parcel are substantially different form those ant:ici;Ja ted by the s, drainage fee structure, the public works director or his designate . adjust or credit the storm drainage fee for said ['arcel to an al??r< ;t_., priate level in accordance with the guidelines spec.i.::.:.ed herein. ; PROCEDURE STATI::-IENT i (1) Detailed In.:o;::-::;at.:or: ProDerty OWne r to Provide I It is the responsibility of t~e ,property oWne~ o~ his aqent t. k . present to the publ ic "Jorks direct-or or his ces.:.\:n2.t'2, sufficient forl:1a tion hydrologic . '. concernlng a t'arcels ct;.arac~2:-l.st.lcs to per::1i . an accurate assessment of the coneitions that ex.ls-::,. This in fOr::1a' , tion may include, but not limiteci to: " 1S ~ .... - A. Site plan sho'" inq locations o~ all be.ilc.inCjs and oth::=r l. cievelopment rc 10 t.l 'Ie to lot lines. ( B. The total lot area .:lnG, area 0: in?er\,"ious Sur:aces. , '" detail to of .-..-.,---.-...-..--..,.-,.- A-4 E. Hydraulic calculatio~s s~ecifying outflow volumes ane . rates for various r2inrc'11 events. .. ( (2) Adjustmen;:s \']here Parce 1 '0 =&: Is Significantly Different ..uno _ ~ From LanG Use Staneard Ilhere the unit runoff generated by a parcel differs from the assigned amount for that land use catagory by more than 20% , the P.\-J.D. may adjust the parcels stars water drainage fee in accor- dance with the following procedure: a. Calculation of unit :::-unof:: for the parcel shall be deter- mined.by the methods outlined ln the Soil Conservation Service Technical Re.lease No. 55, utilizing a 2" total rainfall amount and antecedant moisture condition II. b. If calculated unjt runoff ~s shown to differ from the assigned amount for that land use catagory by 20% or more, the number of assigned pxU's for that parcel shall be adjusted by ~ultiplying by the ratio of the calculated , . unit runoff to the standard unit runoff. , fee shall be c. A parcels storm water drainage subject to increases as well as decreases by this procedure. .. d_ Because single family and duplex fees are not based upon ,. actual parcel acreage, no adjustments for un~t runoff dif- .,. ferences will be made for those land uses. ". ( 3) Procedure for Calcualtion of Credits for .let Ponds .. ("\ A parcel may be credited for up to fifty (50%) percent of the storm water drainage fee for onsite measures which are owned ane I' maintained by the applicant which effectively reduce the outflow of l_ sediment/nutrients fror.l tne si~e_ Creait percentaae ~nall be bG.seo. On one-half of the actual t'ercentage of seaiment removal efficiency, [ as deter~inea oy the following ?roceaure, rounded to the nearest. 5%; except that no credit will be given for sediment removal efficiencie l of less than 20?, .. A. Calculation of C~edits for Net Ponds i... Determine total site acreage' and percent of site that a. has an improved or impervious surface. ! b. Calculate the annual cepth of rune f f from the followins L equation: I ).597 ! 0 r=P(.75 I +.15)-5.234 (_25-.1875 m m ~.~ ("here o = annual depth of runo::::: ~n inches. r r" I = percent qi site ~~~ious area, expressed ~ a c8cir:""al~ ! L, m - P = annu~l depth of pr2ci?itation = 29 inches. , . . c. Calculate annual volt:..r::e of runo::f in acre-feet: v = site acreage ~ oj 12 annual r c.3.?aci~y elevation in , \vher('!: - - --- A-5 .: I' I . ( ~ '0 i ~ ~ I ~ . ~ '0 l i > I ~ m I 5 :: I I ~ ,1 CAPACI'TY INFLOW RATIO. ocrc-ft/ocre-ft/yr ~ I o 0.001 0.002" O.OO:S 0,01 0.02 O.O:S 0.1 0.2 0.:1 1.0 2.0 :1.0 BRUNE'S TRAP EFFICIENCY CURVE g. Credi t = % sedir.ent rerroval efficiencY/2 X storm crain2.ce fee. (4) Credits for Storm Water Detention: . A parcel may be credited for up to 25'" of the stom '.-rater druin' . age fee for onsite measures which limit storm water oucflo~ rates . from the site in accordance wlth the following procea~re: l a. 2.0~ credit for ~arc~15 ~hich J.init ~eak out~lo~ r~tes ~urin' . - . a 5-year rainfall event to predevelopment rates. b. Additional 15% credit for parcels \-Jhich li:::it ;oeai.: out:lo'", rates during a lOO-year rainfall event to ?rece~elo?~enc rates. (Based on the rational method of runoff analysis. Predeve. ment condition shall be considered to have a rac~onal "CO of 0.2. Time of concentration shall be nO shor~er than 30 c. No detention credits will be olven for sarcels which co nc limit 5-year event outflow rat~s toprec~velop~ent levels. (5) Credits ShO\'/TI In (3) and (4) .'ilicve !.!ay be Cu:;".ulat~','e. (6) periodic Inspection and Credit Ad1ust~ents. Public Works Director reserves the right to inspect periodical] all storm drainage control facilities to ascertain that they ~re ope ing properly. If such a system, due to im~ro~e~ ~ai~~enunce or othE h_ reason, fails to detain or cleanSe stor~ water ~u~or= 1n an eifecti\ manner, tt:e- ciirec~orr::ay eli::1ir.ate or ::::-ecucc \.Jacer q~.:J.li~:~ or detent , credits to ~n apprcpr:ate level. Any such ~acili~y ahall not be ~l~ . gibl~ .to ap;;l,! for Stor:7l .drainage fee .::;,djustoenr.s ~or a, ;:>eriod 0:: 1: _. IContn:; follc''''ln'J any C::-CClt ud)ustr::ent. Credit adjust:::e"-ts shall DC >{ C . be mad~rct50:~~l'JelY.. ' ' ~)~;> ; Theissuanceof)'any,b\tildi ng ,permu or ii~i~\.;[~\ii; ])'~;,;,~~~H~~t~.~~,i~it~1~!1~~~~~~~~:d~"~~o~.~f; I ."- '.' .. '-.' ,. 00704;1992-;::5: 21'FROM-cil'y-u~-~~vi-LLc .-.... -. ------- ---- - ...-------.-'-,---.-.. ~ IU ,,' ---,.--.-,,, -"......,.. ,.....-..~.......'= ..; ........-'.....;...~.... . ......- A-6 ;f > '. i: APPLICATION 'i . STORM DRAINAGE UTILITY CREDITS Utility Account No. Name Billing Address Telephone No. property Address , Property Legal Description and PIN i . . . REQUIRED SUBMITTALS: ; . Provide one accurately scaled and dimensioned site drawing showing size and location of all property lines, streets, buildings, and :. structures; parking lots, driveways, and other improved surfaces/ location, size, and grade of all drainage facilities. . . Drawing shall show site contours and elevations of sufficient detail to accurately determine flo~ directions and areas. c Calculate and/or provide all following information: , 1- Total site area in square feet .. 2. Total improved surface area 3. Total'percent improved . , I COMPLETE FOR RATE OF DISCHARGE CONTROL CREDITS: '-' 1- Area of site draining to each control facility ! 2_ Area of improved surface draining to control facility i 3. Type, size, elevation, grade of outlet facility < . . 4. Peak outflow rate for s-year and 100-year rainfall events using rational method, tc- 30 min., in cfs. .. 5-year 100-year specific information on . outflow. ) . . -.".~ - .. -"--.- -...---.---. ',' 08/04/1992 15:21 FROM CITY OF ROSEVILLE . -'--'--. .....- ---~----'--.".. ... .--.... IU ..J u-J....Oj............ . ....._ A-7 . COMPLETE FOR WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT CREDIT: For loiet POJ:lds: 1. Area of site draining to pond 2. Area of improved surface draining to pond 3. Calculate volume of pond for various water elevations. (Show calculations) 4. What is volume of pond below outlet or overflow in acre-feet? other facilities: Sufficient information to demonstrate sediment removal efficiency to be provided by applicant. other requirements: , . I' .. ,. . . , ; CERTIFICATION: THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND AccURATE. I l. r Signature Date - . I. r , ." .- . , ".-. ~ .~~-_._-_.__... .......'---.-"---.-.... ~ .~-"-,;~ .- :f . A-8 1 ; I PUBLIC ~OR~S PROCEDURE i :' .c STOR.\I DR.~I~.-\GE CREDITS ;'larch 27) 1984 BACKGROU:-:D In January of 1984, the Roseville Council adopted a storm dr~inage utility, to get.h\ with city policy allol<ing for adjustr.:ents or credits to storm drainage fees. The following procedure shall be used to calculate these credits to assure consisL~nt application to all situ .1.tions. CREDITS A. ~~D USE INTENSITY CREDITS L Criteria: lfuen uniL runoff generated by a parcel differs from Lhe ass amount by more th3n-20%~ parcel drainage fee is to be adjusLed La refl. aCLual rwlO ff . 2. Required inform~tion by applicanL: .. a) Complete site plan. b) SiLe area and percentage of "improved" surface. 3. CalculaLe Procedure: , . a) Calculate uniL ~unoff by SCSS method; us ing aCLual percenL :mpro' surf:lce, 2" rainr:lll, Soil Group "B1I, Anticetien[ ,\loisture Condit: i.. .. b) Compare wi th "Standard" Uni L Runoff. ( Land Use "Standard" 2" Runoff Single family ~ 241. Cemeteries ~ golf courses .0911 ... Developed parks .18'1 Schoo I s ~ co~~unity centers ~ 30" " NulLiple ~ churches .56" i Commercial/industrial 1.2401 c) If calcul~ted uniL runoff differs from sLandard by 20% or ~ore, ; , JUSL parcels REU value by raLio of aCLual unit runoff to sianda: ! uni t runoff. .. L_ 4. ExcepLions: " a) No adjustQenLs LO single fa~ily p~rcels, as their fees do not de~ - on lot $lze Or intensit:y_ b) For parcels ~i[h dr3inage easc~cntSt reduce ;",rcel si:e to ~On-e: ncnt: arc:! t then calculaLe uniL runorf. t."' B. Rate of Dischar~e CrediLs r L Cri[cri3-~ l~len pe3k runo!f fro~ site is liClited to pre-developoent Ie' -' by on-:;ite f:1'cilities o"ncu .and ...aintained by property ol'ner. up to 25.... ..reduction in drainage 'fce can be !;ranted. --. 2. Required infor::::Jtion by applic;mt: a) Complete si plan. _.._.__.,-_........."'"""-'-..~-'--.._-,.__.._._-" - ,-... . -- ....--...--..---... __ _______.c._ ..,,_....... ~... A-9 . Calculation Procedure. . 3. a) Divide site into areas ~hich drain eo each drainage ouelee. . b) Select design rainfall. . --- -----. c) Route rainfall through pond using modified rational n:er.hod. ( . choose tc' at least 30 J:lin., i111d use "C" Value from Rossnille!"s Equation Graph. Determine peak outflo\; rate by' sUIilllling all area: d) Check other rainfall events to determine 1Tworst" case_ e) Calculate pre-development rates for parcel using "("=.::0 and :15; ing no on-site retention. f) . If peak S-year outflow less than predevelopment--lO~ credie. . If peak lOO-year oueflo\; less than predevelopment--addicional credi L. 4. Exceptions, Special Cases. a) Off-site water drains to ouelet--owner has right to dr;Jin this ,. through his .s'i te wi thout deten tion. Grant credits if he provide sufficient control for his portion of the total flow. (This wil . require applicant to provide iniormation about watershed beyond parcel). b) Outlet facility o'med by city or others--No Credits. (See Criter; c) Shared Ponding Situation: All ponds have an outlet. I f out 1 e e on another's land, no credits (as in b) above), exceDt if the l' level is normally belo\; outlet, (requires historic docu:::ene"-tior. this case, if no overilO\. occurs in a S-year event, parcel gees credit. If no()verflow occurs 100-year event, addieional 1-' :. ~n "', - C. !Vater Quality Credits , ( I. Cri teria: When a parcel provides on-si!.c !.-rca!.r.:cnt. facilities Hhic~- fer. L to improve the quality of runoff exiting the site, up to 50% of the drai fee may be credited depending of treatment effecti~eness. - ! 2. Required information by applicant: ; a) I'.'hen treatment facility is a "",et" pond. (1) Area of site draining to pond and percent impervious. (2) Volume' of pond belo\; outlet elevation. :t.. b) ,fuen treat~ent facility not a pond, applicant to furnish sufficien I documentation to a5certain the effectiveness of the :':acility in re , suspended solids. , ~- - Calculation procedure for "et ponds: 3. I a) Divide site into areas dr3ining to each outlet: or facilit.y. I, runoff for CJ.ch o.rc.J. u~in5 b) Calculate the 3.verJ.ge annual the follo\;ing equations: .Sqr ~ Or=P (':75 I + .15) -5.2.3-1 (.~5-.1S75 Ir.l) , ::\ lo,... ",here Dr=annu.J.l runoff depth - - P=:lnnu:d rainfall = 29 inches IC'I=o~ improved, expressed asa decical. c) culate vol~~c (V annual) Dr , . = 12' x area acreage. in feet be 1010 ,.. _._. ,-,_.._ "'_'.m."u___', .'._...._..___."..._.u.u, __ .~ , . _ <.__ u.~,~.._..._ ~ _c____..o.:...:..:.--'__'--_"_.____'' . .._....._ _.______.______________, __ ___,._.. ..~g " 'j; t- ., A-/O 1 ~. -~ . g) Calculate total site efficiency by proportioning the efficiency O' ~ each area, and adding together. . . h) Calculate credit: Credit=site efficiency/2 x RGU value x cur,ent rc .4. Exceptions and special cases. a) Off-site water drains to treatment area-- Ignore effects of off-site water in calculacing pond efficiency. b) Parcel shares ponding facility. If parcel has water. normally ponded On sicc, calculacc volume of pond on that site below outfall. Thcn calculate credit pcr nO~~ procedure. D. Other Credi ts ; Il'here, in the opinion of the staff, the above procedures do not resul t in an af priate storm drainage charge, the Public Ivorks Director has the authority to ma adjustments consistant with the intent of the storm Jrainage utility. i.. AUTlIORITY , . Drainage, Olapter 74, Storm Water Drainage Utility, adorted .January. 1984. -.. . City POhcy, Crcdits and/or adiustments to municinal S,OT'::l '"He, d~:tin:t"~ :'~,.s-- ,. adoptcd January, 1984. L ( ! Ii r. II ik.. .. t ff ~< [ . 1. .. ':. . .....<1 , ." " . --'_'__-0'__".--.'-"'.'. .~,____.._ . _... ~~....__.___.._.__",., ,_ ______._.__~.,_.__,.._. _. _. . . ',-.-.--- ..-..-,......... ..,_......__.~._.__.,__.__,_"-".__".c._ '" ."C.__" __'_,___._,_~o_._ "m;.._...,.,_.._._.:._.._._,,___'-'-.,:~ _~ . , . 'e r' i , . , . Appendix B: State Legislation - , , , I. r- i ,- ~ ,. ~.. . re L. L t' . [ [ f. ~ , r: - ;-- , -.. :aI: '.,:';;':;'<= 0.__._.__,._,._.... __'":____________.___._____ __, "._ _ _ '_h..~'_._, .'-'.;:..~_..~"~_."____~,'_._..~____ _.. _..,,----~-"._-~..---_.._-_..- , __".-'--..__.._._..~.._.,.,~..~.~,._., C~..e'~"---- ~ . .__._-~. "'-- ~ , R . B-1 ~ : '~ J. 1933 UEGUL.\lt SESSION eh, 133 I , .her another WATER AND SEWER FACfLITIES-CHARGES Jlv ~I,sen'e the "5 ( lped with CHAPTER 133 a wtde field of .~ .o:.r'. W. H.F.No. 313 ~ t1+e CQl+1mlE: .... I' An Act relating to focal government; regulating kinds 01 and charges . , for water and sewer facilities and serJ'ices; amending r.1innesota "~I . . Statutes 1982, section 444.075..subdivisions 1 and 3. , ~I .. .' :.; CITY Be it enacted by the Legislature of the Slate of Minnesola: ::,: 'r; '. Section L Minnesota Statutes 1982, section 44..1.075, subdivision 1, is .:I..J amended to read: - . c!Jll . 0'1'1 Subdivision L Authorization. Any home rule charter city, except cities ! ;r:i " of the first class Qper:ating ~ a ~ AJ-t.e~. or any statutory city . ;,~ ricultural opera- is.~ :ltP"hGlrioz9d aOO on:'lpg"-ered. to mav build, construct. reconstruct. . ._,. "'il1 :ding Minnesota repair. enlarge, improve. or in any other manner obtain ::'!!i. Jting Minnesota @ waterworks systems. including mains. valves. hydrants. ..n'ice con. ':'T I, ... I nections. wells. pumps, reserroirs. tanks, treatment plants, and other .;' . i.I!; appurten.ances of a watenvorks system, 600 /'I:i vta: , j .-:ubdi....ision 2. is (ii) sewer systems. sewage tre3tment works. disposal systems.. .and other ;-~~ ," iJ.cilitie.s ror disposing of sewage, industrizd waste. or other Wastcs~ :mu .1' ... .ricuitunl oper- ~ .'" Wi) ~ ~ svstems.. incJudin1; m:l.ins. hoIrline :::J.rC:lS ano ~ :lod . . ..: il! :;~corne ;) pri\.:'1l,.e~ other-armurtenances and rehted facilities (or the collection and m$Dosai or .:. \ - . - - ,,,;j;1 :e (lr operation H ~~ ." .( ~ J,tion. The all hereinafter called f:1cilities. and tG mainl3in ::md operate the same inside ..:i;g .n _",0 or injury .::rl Or outside its corporate limits. .and tQ :acquire by g-if(. purchJse, l~.J.se, ....t.~ It an :lzri(uitural l.'ondemnation or other....ise any and all bnd and easements required for . '::!j .uted ::u~ricuitural .1'; ! th::l.t purpose. The .authority hereby granted shall bE" in addition to :111 other . J: pi ~Ies. or permits: tlowers with reference to &-U--GA the facilities otherwise ~nted by the laws . '''''/ I:,.... :t threat oi injury of this st.J.te or by- the charter ~:my ~ city. The authorit\, I.!r:lnted in . !i:jl.' :1 oi. or ch:lOKe 10 dau~e (jii) to cities which have territor.' within ~""ater:shed which h:Js ':: '~ " H . of waters on. the ~d .:! watershed plan pursuant ~ section 473~87.R shall be exercise-no .:j'tl. ! "'" \t..o limi<o <>f '" . . "III Hot f:!.cility with a \...ich re~n~ct t(') f::J.cilities acouired follo\Vin~ the ndoDtion or the watersned ""i: ; .. pl."ln. ~rf-3citities which ::lre not inconsisten[ with the w;t;r~heri ol:1n. :i'j \ i.. ~ .:1 the rules of the , It! authorit\' ~r:\nted in cl:tusel1ii)"W cities which h:n'e adooted 10(":11 \\~ .:il[ :m:.J.l feealOt5, or 3- _. . I: ------- - "II t ~\' Vro$t!cutlOn for m:tn.:1C'Cr.l('nt rJans pursuant !.Q section ~_ shall be excrc:sco. With . !I :('~n('ct co facilities acouired following- the ;"Idontion of J.'local obn. onh' for '.', _ ;)r to :In action by ~fi~\.'hich ~ not incon$i~tent \I,.ith the locJ.1 pb-;;.-COu~s~cept ' j\: :1 :.Jublic nuiSJnce. . ./t ,:-ouncies in the se\.en COUnl\- metro:::!olitJn J.rea. shall hJ.\'e the sJ.me :'If ..' :,uthority g:r:1nted to cities b~v this ::i~bdi\;sion except for JreJ.S of the . <; ~ :, ~ ~ Te'nE':lled. ':OUnt:. organized into Cities and J.re:lS of the county incorporo.ted within a \.: ~;)nlt::J.ry district e:)t:lblishcd by special act of the lcg-isbture. ..:. 1 UndC'"sco!!!!g 3nd c.tU.k.4-OU1.ll .Jre ..,. shown In C'nroHed :act .. ::lled .act L 555 \ ; . - .' , , 8-2 . ~~!~i~ll!!l!~]I~l!ll{it!~ ~o .3 :6. ~~ 0"; or; . - o~ 0>'" C >-- C '" .;:> =0 ~ >- n- > :J ~~~~~~'C~~_~~~~_~~u~~O~~u_~C~ ~ ~C; ~l~~'~ ~~ ~.~ 1:~~ ~i~ ~ :~ 3~ ~.~~ ~ ~~ ~ " " .3 - g- tn_ " ~ en ~N ~ ~O~~S=~~=~~~~~;3~~~~~~~~~~~ il E- 00 ~ <5 3; _ .::3 :: ':": :::.- :: c :.:: '- :::: -' ::.I -= :-l ::=. -" "Jl :) 0 <l.I ::l _ C> ," if] >-~ " 6 ~ c..I :::: C -:J _ _ .- :) '::.G...... = ;..:: -- a C ::J ::tl c...c --:) c ~\ ,-; ~~~ i'~] ~lj~~~~~jr(~~ l! ~~ji~ ~~ c > ., - <- U ~~ "'" '" :z: n= '? c c:: u~ ...cUL..l-,---:J .:J :J~- -'-........... ./l......._~::tlU') Z - 'n u 2 ~ :: '-' ..:::: -::; :I) ~ ::) ~ ~ ~ ::; -=.-;:: ::J ':;..2 0 ~ ~ :: u :: <.t'l ':l::: g\ '" "'<fl ~ :n ..c, __-./10.....= -r.___'- -=,-_:J -.,;,:>0_ -c~ - D. ~ '" U :JU~~O'-~:)= =~"""~_:J~~~=~~cc3~ E- v>!; 'n :n ~illii~li!tlilltll{Itl~lill~ ;;:: -< n 0 .. :-i -, .~1 ~ ~ ,; 0", :S '" -< '.' t z c c 15 :::: ? - ~\ :.. ~ -< ....: .:; :;;: " ~ " C - - 0- ~ ~ C> :.: .gj l v o.c .. '0 -c_~:Jb~.......:J ~~~=~_~UoodA~a ::.I~C ~ C C ~ ~ ,., 0__'- ~O?~......~~~--~ ~~::tlcu~~-"~ou "'I'" ~ 0 <> '" '" ...c c --;::; _~ .,j >. c. ;;; ~ -::::: 0:::: ;:, ;:: ~ =- .=-:oj ~ -0 ,:1;1 .... -' ""::I :-j ;:.-, C ~ ~ ,; ..c '" ~ E ~ => - '" -< n -l - u2~S.~~~--_~~~n.;~.~~~~?:Jg';3c.~E- x '" ~_~c_=~~~'_~~w~~=~='=~~~O~d~OO '0 ;\-- ....., ~~ " " 111 "- :.= ::; C.:::- I;- == =- _ _ .... :::..::: -= -- -;; = U I.... 0 '-.~ .... " '-I = >-- o~u-i ~~~o.~~g.g~~=~5~==~u~~~ ~~o~.5~ > - - ~ - , ill~i!t!lii!iliitiilji~l~l ~ E- ~ u - >- en >- c -'> - .= ':Jl2 Z - " c :::._ - ~ - - - ~ ;; '.' .~1_ -;; (5.- C - > ~I <; " '" u::; .... :-- '-' ~ '" '"' .;-:l ::; ;:;- '-' ~\ := ~::;::::.3;::I'1~'/';.C::.1 -:..0.-:: '>>?;?~:Il::.J:j:ll' ::.JE>-::: " .- - .0: 0 V> '- I~l]'~ ~ :lii1t~~i t~l~ ~ i~l1~~l1 - - " ~ -<t: : '" c '- <i . u - -. - --- -' .~ '"' c: .2 ~ .:;: '0 ..0 " ., ,,; <- ~ -. :.: -. c ;- .g '"" "J " ~ 'f) ,,;,i '" '" . . .~ ." ~ ~ ~ '. Z; ~ ~~ .= .:. ~ - 'r., - - :-i~ OJ - . .7:. CITY OF ARDEN HILIB . HEXIWIDtIH '10: Jerry Filla, city Attorney Terry Maurer, City EDgilIeer John Berqly, City Planner Dan WiJlkel, Public works SUperint--t = Post, City 1\ccoUntant L9a !ago, Deputy Clerk Carolyn DruCIe, Ehlers , Associates, J.Dc~ J1lCIII: Dorothy A. Person, city lldministrator I>>\!l'E : November 5, 1992 stlB.JECT : StoJ:m water utility planning Session - REVISED On November 12 at 3:00 p.m., a strategy session with staff and the consultants will be held to discuss a stann water utility that will be presented at the city Council w=ksession meeting on November 16, 1992, at 4:30 p.m. If you have any comments = infonnation prior to this session, please forward them to me. I also have sample ordinances fran the city of New Brighton and . Shoreview f= your review. OAF Its . - , . . CITY OF ARDEN HILLS 1450 WEST HIGHWAY 98 ARDEN HILLS, MN 55112-5794 October 6, 1992 Mr. Mark Graham . MSA 1959 Sloan Place st Paul, Mn 55117 RE: SUrface Water Management utility Dear Mark: Attached is infonnation from Attorney Filla regarding a SUrface Water Management utility for the city. Please review this infonnation and provide your recormnendations to Council by Friday, October 9, 1992. Please =ntact me as soon as possible if this infonnation cannot be sub:nitted by Friday. Thank you, . Dorothy Person City Administrator nAP Its Enclosures fYlayor ~ C~ . 10/;.3/'1c:<. eC- : J. Ber:J/y ~.> ir j: J:a.g 0 ! med: ID/O(P[~ , /Jj,'nJ(e/ J" - t,;. :D,P~A./ r, t. PHONE: (612) 633.5676 . FAX (612) 633-7839 -- --- .- , RECEIVED OCT 2 1992 WARREN E. PETERSON PETERSON, FRAM & BERGMAN tREAL PROPERTY LAW SPECIALIST ,JEROME p, FILLA PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION 'ALSO ADMITfED IN FLORIDA, DANIEL wrIT FRAM 300 MIDWEST FEDERAL BUILDING ILLINOIS, WASHINGTON D.C., GLENN A. BERGMAN WISCONSIN . JOHN MICHAEL MILLER 50 EAST FIFTH STREET - OF COUNSEL GARY W. BECKER* ST. PAUL, MINNESarA 55101.1197 MELVIX J. SILVER TIMOTHY J. HASSElTt - MICHAEL T. OBERLE (612) 291.8955 FAX NO. (612) 228.1753 October 1, 1992 Dorothy Person City Administrator City of Arden Hills 1450 West Highway 96 Arden Hills, MN 55H2 RE: Surface Water Management Utility Our File No.: 10450/920001 Dorothy: Enclosed is a copy (!)f regulations adopted by the City of , Shoreview relating to the creation of a Surface Water Management Utility. These regulations would have to be reviewed by the City's Consulting Engineer and tailored to meet the needs of the City of . Arden Hills. However, they do give you an idea of the process involved in creating this type of utility. Please note that the Surface Water Management utility is treated the same as a Sanitary Sewer or Water utility for purposes of collecting revenues. Quarterly or annual statements are sent to customers. Delinquent accounts are certified to taxes. If you have any questions or if you need any help in structuring an Ordinance specifically for the City of Arden Hills, please contact me. Very truly yours, Filla JPF:bap ',-. encs. ~ . .1 .. . CITY 01' SHOREVIEll' ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE ADDING CHAPTER 520 TO THE SHOREVIEV MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE CREATION OF A SURFACE VATER MANAGEMENT UTILITY The City Council ordains as an addition to the Shoreview Municipal Code: Chapter 520 is hereby added to read as follows to the Municipal Code of the City of Shoreview: 520. SURFACE '\lATER MANAGEMENT UTILITY 520.010. General Operation. The Municipal surface water system shall be operated as a public utility (hereinafter called the surface water management utility), pursuant to Minnesota Statute Section 444.075, from which revenues will be derived subject to the provisions of this Chapter and Minnesota Statutes. . 520.020. Definitions. (A) Utility Factor. The utility factor is defined as the ratio of runoff volume, in inches, for a particular land use, to the runoff volume, in inches, for a 1/3 acre residential lot, assuming a2" rainfall and Soil Conservation Service (SCS) "Type B" soil conditions. (B) Surface Vater Management Fee. The surface water management fee is defined as the quarterly charge developed for each parcel of land. (C) Quarterly Surface Vater Management Revenue. The quarterly surface water management revenue is the estimated quarterly expenditures for planning and inventories, capital expenditures, personnel and equipment and operation of the surface water utility, in accordance with established City policy. The quarterly surface water management revenue and resulting surface water management fees shall be established for a period of time as set by City Council resolution. . -.. '-.. ., .~...'-......:.- ~----- ~- - ". - ~ I .- .,'. . .-.-.""'.....,.'.;...-... .'~"""".. .... -- - .~.~' -.--~ - -. ~ ~ . --"- -- -- - .. . SURFACE VATER MANAGEMENT UTILITY ORDINANCE PAGE TlIO 520.030. Surface Vater ManaRement Factors. The utility factors for various land uses used to determine the surface water management fees are assigned as follow: Classification Land Use Utility Factor 1 Rural Residential (2-1/2 acre lots) 0.21 2 Single-Family Residential (1/3 acre lots) LOO 3 Mixed Low & Medium Density Residential 2.24 4 Apartments, Industrial Office, Institutions (churches, schools, government buildings, hospitals) 3.34 5 Business/Commercial 4.28 6 Undeveloped 0.03 . 7 Parks, Cemeteries, Golf Courses, Arboretum 0.45 8 Parking Lots 6.14 520.035. Surface Vater Management Fee. Surface water management fees shall be established for a period of time as set'by City Council resolution. The Surface Vater Management Fee shall be determined by first determining the percentage of total runoff in the City, which is attributed to Single-Family Residential property. The fee-per-acre for Single-Family Residential is computed by equating the runoff percentage to an equal percentage of the Quarterly Surface Vater Management Revenue, divided by the estimated total acres of Single-Family Residential land use in the City. The per-acre fee for all individual parcels shall be defined as the product of the Single-Family Residential Fee, the appropriate utility factor and the total acreage of the parcel. Single-Family Residential and Rural Residential parcels shall be assessed on a per-lot basis using the acreages as determined by established City policy. 520.040. Credits. The Council may adopt policies, by resolution, for adjustment of the surface water management fees. Information to justify a fee adjustment must be supplied by the property owner. Such adjustments of fees shall not be retroactive, unless provided within . sall! resolution. Credits will be reviewed annually by a staff committee. 1; 't J . , - - -. -- . SURFACE VATER MANAGEMENT UTILITY ORDINANCE PAGE THREE 520.050. Exemptions. The following land uses are exempt from the . surface water management fee: (a) Public Right-Of-Vay (b) Lakes (c) Undeveloped parcels 520.060. Statement of Surface Vater Hana~ement Char~es. Statements for the preceding quarterly Surface Vater Management service shall be mailed to each customer pursuant to the same procedures as listed under Section 506.130 of this code. 520.070. Appeal.of Fee. If a property owner or person responsible for paying the surface water management fee believes that a particular assigned fee is incorrect, such a person may request, that the fee be recomputed. Appeals will be heard by Council once a year in accordance with the schedule established for credit applications, in established . City policy. . 520.080. Penalties For Delinquent Payments. A penalty equal to 10% of the amount due shall be added to accounts not paid in full on or before the 1st day of the second month following the billing periods and to each quarterly billing thereafter until the amount of the delinquent account plus accrued' penalty is paid in full or otherwise certified to the County Auditor as a delinquent account. 520.090. Annual Certification of Delinquent Accounts. Each year the City Manager shall prepare a list of delinquent surface water management service charge accounts, including accrued,penalties thereon, in the form of an assessment roll. On or before October 1 of each year, the City Council shall review the delinquent surface water management service charge assessment roll 'and adopt an appropriate resolution directing that the assessment roll be certified to the County Auditor as a lien against the premises served and directing that the County Auditor collect the assessment a part of the ensuing year's tax levy. All delinquent surface water management service charge assessments shall bear interest, at a rate determined by the City Council, from the date on which the delinquent surface water management service charge assessment resolution is adopted until December 31 of the following year. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Shoreview this day of , 1991 . The provisions of this ordinance shall become effective on the 1st day of December , 1991. Published on the day of , 1991. . Attest: Richard Wedell, Mayor Dw4~ht Johnson, City Manager , ~ . - - ~ . RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING CITY POLICY ON OPERATION OF SURFACE YATER MANAGEMENT UTILITY YHEREAS, the City Council has created a surface vater management utility, and YHEREAS, the operation of said surface vater management utility requires the establishment of criteria directing operations. NOY, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF SHOREVIEY, MINNESOTA, That the folloving is hereby established as City Policy for the operation of the Shoreviev Surface Yater Management Utility: SHOREVIEV SURFACE VATER MANAGEMENT UTILrTY City Policy . (1) Policy Statement All properties vithin the City of Shoreviev shall contribute to the Surface Yater Management Utility in an amount proportional to the runoff contributed by each particular parcel. (2) Exemptions (a) Undeveloped Lands - Undeveloped lands, or land in a natural, undisturbed condition, shall be exempt from all charges. -- (b) Street and Highway Right-of-Vay - Street and highvay right-of-vay shall be exempt from all charges. (c) Lakes - Lakes listed by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources as Natural Environment Vaters, Recreational Development Vaters or. General Development Vaters shall be exempt from charges. (d) Parks - Parks under the ownership of the City or Ramsey County shall be exempt from charges. This shall include all open space areas within the City. (3) Fee Basis (a) Land Use - Land use for determining surface water management fees . shall be the existing land use at the date of enactment of the . Surface Vater Management Ordinance. As land is developed, or re~eveloped, the fees viII be recomputed based on the revised land use. - '- . RESOLUTION NO. PAGE TIm (b) Soils - Soil Conservation Service (SCS) - Type B soils shall be assumed for. determining the runoff index (CN) in the revenue equation. ,". (c) Rainfall (P) - A 2" rainfall will be used on the revenue equation. (d) Runoff Indices (CN) - The runoff indices for the property ,--- classifications are as follow: Classification Land Use Runoff Index (CN) 1 Rural Residential (2-1/2 acre lots) 60 2 Single-Family Residential (1/3 acre lot) 72 3 Mixed .Low & Medium Density Residential (l/B to 1/4 acre lot) B2 . 4 Apartments, Industrial Office, Institutions (churches, schools, government buildings, hospitals) BB 5 Business/Commercial 92 6 Undeveloped -- 7 Parks, Cemeteries, Golf Courses 65 B Parking Lots ... 9B (e) Revenue Equation - The revenue equation for computing the runoff volume (Q) shall be based on the runoff equation in the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) National Engineering Handbook Section 4/Hydrology. The equation is as follows: , 2 where S ~ (1000/CN) - 10 Q ~ (P-0.2S) P + O.BS and P ~ 2" (4) Credits Surface water management fees may be adjusted under the conditions stated below. It shall be the responsibility of the property owner to provide justification for the fee adjustment. Credits must be applied for by October 31 of the year preceding the year in which the credit is . to be considered, except that during the first months of operation, property owners shall have unt~l March 15, 1992 to apply for credits, which shall be retroactive to the start date of Utility. - . . -' . RESOLUTION NO. PAGE THREE (a) Storm Vater.Retention - If it can be demonstrated that an individual parcel retains all or a portion of the rainfall that it receives, the surface water management fee will be reduced by a percentage equal to that percent of the parcel which produces no external runoff. A fee. reduction of 20 percent or greater must. be demonstrated. (5) Adjustment of Fees Surface water management fees will be adjusted under the following conditions: (a) Revision of Quarterly Surface Vater Revenue - The estimated expenditures for the management of surface water shall be revised at a frequency specified in the ordinance. The fees will be adjusted accordingly and will follov established City procedures for this adjustment of utility (water and sewer) rates. . (b) Application for Credit (c) Change in Developed Condition of Parcel .- . -'F.- .~..- 4/L: . .... . RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE SURFACE VATER MANAGEMENT UTILITY RATES VHEREAS, the recently adopted Shoreview Municipal Code, Section. 520.030, requires the City Council to determine by resolution the user rates and charges for the Surface Vater Management Utility. NOV, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OFSHOREVIEV, MINNESOTA, That the quarterly charge by land use within the City shall be: Land Use Quarterly Charge Single Family Home $ 4.95/10t Townhomes $ 5.25/10t Condominiums $34.20/acre Apartments $41. 49/acre Commercial $53. 19/acre . Industrial $41. 49/acre Schools/Churches $41. 49/acre Parks $ O.OO/acre AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that said rates shall become effective upon the effective date of operation of the Shoreview Surface Vater Management Utility and shall remain in effect until changed by resolution of the City Council. . ~ t t -J; , , , . ~W1 CONSULTING ENGINEERS Maier Stewart & Associates Inc. October 2, 1992 Mr. Steve Woods District Engineer Rice Creek Watershed District J.M Montgomery Consulting Engineers 545 Indian Mound Wayzata, MN RE: RCWD COMMENTS ON ARDEN HILLS LOCAL WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN Dear Mr. Woods: On behalf of the City of Arden Hills, Maier Stewart & Associates, Inc. (MSA) prepared the draft Water Management Plan which was submitted to the Watershed District in May. We have received the review comments letter dated, August 26, 1992. This . letter is our response to those comments. Runoff Manaaement Standards for flow to detention basins are to be included in the City ordinance. However, it does not seem appropriate to include the flow standards in the management plan itself. The management plan is written to provide a general overview for water management within the city. Specific requirements are to be included in the city ordinances. Water quality of the runoff can be handled using some of the techniques de- scribed in the MPCA Protectina Water Qualitv in Urban Areas. Passages in that book indicate that different methods of control should be determined for each location on a site specific basis. It seems inappropriate to limit the methods allowed by naming only one or two techniques in the Water Management Plan. Best Management Practices (BMP) should be required. The City Engineer or RCWD can have approval rights. Pond design will be included with the plat development plans. The plat plan will be reviewed by the City Engineer and staff. Since this is an area of particular concern to the Watershed District, the RCWD may continue be involved in the plat review process for development, especially in the Round Lake area. MSA, Inc. employees are reluctant to include the TR20 run data in the plan itself. . We believe there is a potential for misuse of this data if it is published as part of the plan. MSA believes that the qualitative modeling results are the appropriate 1959 SLOAN PLACE, SUITE 200, ST PAUL, MINNESOTA 55117 612-774-6021 9800 SHELARD PARKWAY, SUITE 102, MINNEAPOLIS. MINNEsarA 55441 612-546-0432 . Equal Opportunity Employer --- .., RCWD Comments October 2, 1992 Page 2 . level of reporting for the management plan. The District review comments on the TR 20 modeling have not been received yet. Policy 2.3 which discusses providing outlets for land-locked areas was developed from Arden Hills and MSA's interpretation of the RCWD Management Plan policies: Please clarify the RCWD interpretation of this policy. The policy could be elimi- nated from the plan upon your recommendation. Individual Sewage Treatment Systems; An inspection program for the few remaining individual treatment systems has been recommended to the city council. The RCWD will be informed when the program is adopted. It is understood that this program will be under the jurisdic- tion of the building inspector. Wetland Management: Wetland regulation by the state may change as the Board of Water and Soil Resources develops the rules for implementing the 1991 Wetland Conservation . Act. The national, state and local identification of existing wetlands within Arden Hills are included in the management plan. The city of Arden Hills acknowledges that the RCWD has elected to maintain wetland permitting authority until the state has developed new regulations or rules and the City has revised its ordi- nances to meet those regulations. The BWSR recommendations and the state statute require that wetland maps be included in the Water Management Plan. If the RCWD provides a key or appro- priate conversion chart for NWI symbols and the USF (Type 1 - through 8), it will be included in the plan documents. Shoreland Management: The City of Arden Hills has a state approved shore land management ordinance. The last revision of this ordinance was September 30, 1985. Floodplain Management: The City of Arden Hills, Ordinance No. 283, dated October, 1991, has been forwarded under separate mailing. In addition a copy of a letter from FEMA to Arden Hills regarding this ordinance has been forwarded. Construction Erosion: Erosion control inspection during construction is by the City Building Inspector or . the City Engineer, depending on the type of project. The Building Inspector is . RCWD Comments October 2, 1992 . Page Three Dave Kreisel. He can be reached at 633-5676. The Building Inspector will refer questions to the City Engineer when appropriate. Groundwater Protection: The City will forward any information it has regarding appropriation of ground- water for heating and cooling purposes. Since these appropriations are regulated by state permits, the City has not developed an inventory of the usage in Arden Hills. We suggest that the RCWD acquire this information directly from the State. Other Comments: We look forward to receiving a copy of the RCWD projects for the Long Lake chain of lakes. Arden Hills agrees that maintenance of those projects should remain in the watershed district jurisdiction. The beaver problems, at Valentine Lake, were referenced as a documented health problem associated with an incident where a maintenance worker became ill after working near and in the lake. The annual inspection of the drainage system should include inspection of the outlet from Valentine Lake. Removal of the material blocking the drainage ditches may be necessary. The DNR has trapped . and removed beaver from areas near this outlet in the past. MSA, Inc. and the City of Arden Hills await additional clarification from the RCWD. Very truly yours, MAIER STEWART & ASSOCIATES, INC. f~~~ ~ Patricia A. Arlig, P.E. Environmental Engineer /~til%i~ Brian D. Miller, P.E. Project Engineer PAA:bs cc: RCWD 3585 Lexington Avenue North Arden Hills, MN 55126-8016 Cathy lago, City of Arden Hills . I I '. I " ! I I - '.' . ........, UNDEVELOPED/UNDERDEVELOPED " INCREASED INTENSITY DEVELOPED WITH NO ON-SITE WATER STORAGE ':;1 ,> ~~~ " ~i_' . .. , . CONSULTING ENGINEERS Maier Stewart & Associates Inc. DISCUSSION REGARDING IMPLEMENTATION OF A STORMWATER UTllJTY CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION NOVEMBER 16, 1992 Workinl! Definition of a Stormwater Utility A stormwater utility is an organization, with its own revenue source, that collects, treats, and disposes of storm water. The utility also maintains the present and future stormwater collection system. The utility is also responsible to address new issues relating to runoff which are brought up by the Rice Creek Watershed, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, or other state/federal agencies. Tvnes Of New Or Onl!oinl! Proiects That Could Be Funded Throul!h A Stormwater Utility . . Annual Street Infrastructure Projects ($5.50/foot of reconstructed street) . Partial Share of County Road Projects ($10.00/foot of reconstructed street) . Local Issues, i.e., Arden Place, Valentine Hills ($32,600 - 71) . Drainage Easement Acquisition ($20,000 - $50,000) . Construction of Regional Ponds ($10,000 - $40,(00) . Street Sweeping Equipment ($100,000) . Seasonal Sweeping ($15,600) . Report/Permit Preparation ($30,000) . Repair/Maintenance of Existing Facilities ($25,000) . Keithson Pond ($70,000) Given a "typical" construction season, including reconstruction of one-half mile of roadway, routine maintenance and sweeping, cost sharing on County projects, and an unanticipated drainage issue, the City could reasonably expect storm sewer related costs of $100,000 to $150,000. . 1959 SLOAN PLACE, SUITE 200, ST, PAUL, MINNEsarA 55117 612-774-6021 9800 SHELARD PARKWAY, SUITE 102, MINNEAPOLIS. MINNEsarA 55441 612-546-0432 . Equal Opportunity Employer 042-1401.nov . . ComDarisons Of Stonn Sewer Utilitv Rates Of Nearbv Communities Residential charges are based on an average lot size of 1/3 acre or a flat rate per lot. Commercial or industrial charges are on a per acre of development basis and assume the site is large impervious. Residential Charge Commercial/Industrial Charge Per Quarter Per Acre Per Quarter Shoreview $4.95 $41.49 Roseville $4.38 $66.30 Vadnais Heights $4.50 $36.25 Fridley $1.75 $26.25 North St. Paul $4.05 $52.59 Eagan $4.56 $21. 84 Bloomington $7.80 $53.82 . Woodbury $7.50 $27.50 Average $4.94 $40.76 Revenue Proiections Per Year Based On Various Rates Per Ouarter For Residential and Commercial/Industrial Prooerties Based on 2,400 residential housing units and 525 acres of commerciallindustrialland (Source: Arden Hills Comprehensive Plan) Residential Units Rate/Quarter $2.00 $3.00 $4.00 $5.00 Residential Revenue $19,200 $28,800 $38,400 $48,000 Commercial and Industrial Rate Per Acre/Quarter $20 $30 $40 $50 Commercial and Industrial Revenue $42,000 $63,000 $84,000 $105,000 . TOTAL REVENUE $61,200 $91,800 $122,400 $153,000 042.1401.DOY --------- NOV 16 '92 02:49PM EHLERS & RS50CIRTES P.2 ! Ehlers and Associates,lnc. LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE . Novemi)er 16, 1992 Dorothy Person City Administrator City Hall Arden Hills, ~~ 55112 Re: Storm Water Financing; Options This will follow the P1aruling Session held at City ~ll on Novemher 12. As we understand the consideration of options, the City is in need of a method of raising dollars for certain storm sewer problems that are and have been arising. The basic options available to Minnesota cities for accessing fUnds . to deal with storm sewer projects include: (1) Special Assessments against properties specially benefi tted by the improvements (M.S. Chapter 429). Storm sewer is an especially difficult type of project to assess because drainage is often seen as someone else's problem or fault. An advantage of the special assessment method is that tax exempt properties do participate (if specially benefitted) where they do not for an ad valorem tax. (2) Storm Sewer Improvement District(s) (M.S. Section 444.16 through 444.21). The funds for storm sewer improvements for a stonn sewer district arc raised through an ad valorem property tax after required hearings. A disadvantage of this method may be seen in relating the stoT1n Sewer problems to the value of each property and no dollars being generated from tax exempt properties. An advantage might be that an ad valorem tax is deductible . for state and federal income tax purposes ,and that it is not neces~ary for the City to show benefit. OFFICES IN MINNEAPOLIS. MN . BROOKFIELD, WI . JAMESTOWN, NO 2950 Norw.st Center. 90 South Seventh Slree! . Minneapolis, MN 55402.4100.612.339-8291' FAX 612-339-0854 NOV 16 '92 02:49PM EHLEPS & ASSOCIATES P.3 , . . Dorothy Person November 16, 1992 Arden Hills, ~~ 55112 Page 2 (3) Storm sewer utility user fees OM.S. Section 444.075) An ordinance establishing user fees to be used for storm sewer purposes may be adopted by the City with fees based upon criteria related to runoff and other storm water considerations. These fees are often billed at the same time bllls for sewer and water use are distributed. An advantage might be that there is generally only one action needed to create the util ity and, because it is city-wide, projects throughout the City can be undertaken with the revenues. We understand (from bLL~iness owners) that ,utility fees are more likely to be considered a cost of doing business than the other options. Obviously, there is no need to show benefit. A disadvantage might be that it is difficult for each individual property owner to identify their particular benefit from their payment as early projects will only' benefit those whose projects are undertaken first. However, . over the long run, the revenues should theoretically be of benefit to everyone as they need improvements in their area (or indirectly benefit from all improvements a<; a resident <of Arden !lills). Each of these options (and the statutory authority) will provide sufficient security for tho issuance of general obligation bonds, should the City decide at some future date to undertake a project or projects sufficient large in scope to require longer term financing. ' I will be happy to provide additional information from our experience with all these options and/or to meet to discuss these further. Sincerely, ~J;~ Carolyn DI'ude E.xecutive Vice President/Director . . REVIEW OF 1993 INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR PROPOSALS PROPOSED CURRENT 1993 1992 Animal Control - Not final -- n Attorney - Jerry Filla Prosecution 65.00A,-, 65.00 hI", Civil 90.00 90.00 Auditor - Gary Groen Abdo, Abdo & Eich 7,995.00 9,425.00 (base) (actual) Engineer - Terry Maurer Terry Maurer 79.03!hr 76.73 Maier, Stewart & Associates Mark Graham 51.83!hr 50.23 Inspections: Building - Dave Kriesel 25.00!hr 23.75 Electrical 80% total 80% Heating 80% total 80% . Plumbing 50% total 50% * Tree Inspection - Dave Winkel 13.47 13.47 * Forester 18.52 18.52 Labor Relations - Karen Olsen 85.00 85.00 Law Enforcement (16.275 %) 468,467.51 435,750.68 (5.4 Deputies - $388,153.15) plus portion of Sergeant; Clerk Typists, Radio - 5.77% = $19,563.43 Planner - John Bergly 60.00!hr 60.00 Sanders, Wacker, Wehrman & Bergly 65.00 (1994) Landscaper - Mark Salzman 45,00 45.00 Recording Secretary - Shar Foster 120.00/mtg. 120/mtg. * These duties are performed during the employees' regular workday at the regular rate of pay. . -- ------------- ~'L '"- /' I/' ~ 'J-,--.-/-;~A. I ! I i , ......R. J ' 1: J UNDEVELOPED/UNDERDEVELOPED - G INCREASED INTENSITY DEVELOPED WITH NO ON-SITE WATER STORAGE ',1 " ~~J' " - ~ . "'o.!!! -0 5' -i ;;: ;;1' ~ 0")> 0 ~ ():l: 0 :xl I>> CO <-0 :> III ,^ ~ ,-,"'" 0 '... - oJ Cb - oJ 0- _. - -.;:, ...., <::...., W \16 ~~oro", ..... .~O~"'~ -~....,~~Oa.O~~-~ _ _,...-000 m-- - ~ --O~ em-'co ~.~omg ~~m~~~~~~~~i ~~~~ro~~~~~'~~ 0 ~ g g [g a ~ ~ ~ ~ g} ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ii ~~.g ~ ~ ~ re ~ ~ g ~~ ~3 '< ~ma[; ]S~o~~~gi~~~ ~~g!g~3;~'~ao ~ o CD 0 ~: -0 00 OZ < m (') (') 0 a. W@5'Q)(f) =.-. "'~ i6 ~ 0 m CD CD ~ c,- -o....,~...., m m_~~o-iw 5'ro~~~~ ~~~om ~ ii~g3 ~o~~~~~~~~~;,~ ~I~~mg~&~~_~; ; ~ 5a.. 00 Q; ~ ~ :D :I: 0 c: 0 0 Q.. CD ~lO :! ~ CD :::::J ~ ~ ~ j ('D :T en ~ __ O--rol>> :a:~m~:xl~~-O"O=- _coco_ 1>>< -'" _ ~ -.. 0 =' __ ~ ys ....)> u ... C C """\ --.. <D - .... _ -- '::1"-0 - < co DJ a. ~ 3_~~.... >rnm m~:::::J~3-'- :::::JOoa.Om~W""':::::J_. ~ ~~~ww ~z~z~mo~ 3n a.5~u3owro~a.:::::J ~ m wgronW m~~()~ :::3~"8~ 30." ~CD~~""'cn~:o cc iroSo~ :D<m 5'w~.~~ Qo~m~ro_~DJ~~ m ' """ ~ ==!a..... O:D 0 5'::J DJ D.. CD III a. a. Ul 0 0 1.1J:::::J =r _,:::. .... ...... .:+. <D Z )> en ...., .- UJ :::::J CD < ::J a. - -0 W .-+ A a. C/) ~ ....., "" C-'< 0 r a.Q,lCC-< <::J:=r 3'::TCD-Wm ..., :::::JO~~CD ~C~ ro~~-m ~o~.~~~~Q~~~ ~ o c;: -. m men.... -' 0 - - - < - (/) .... -. ~ ~... ... ;::: =(t)~ zen o~ (').g ~~~~.. o~'~~'<S- Q) ..... .. D) g CD c en ~ c. ..... 0 CD CO ::J....o. ::::JO'< (/)- o "" M~' CD - \;J N 0" 3 ::l, :xl-o 3 - a. - -; '" '" -- a. 3 I>> '" ., :xl :xl Z ~ -0 '---0 --0 -0 ~ - .,,:;; - C (h)> C ~ C ~_...... ~.....~~ OO~CD non-~ _(')::::J~::::J~D) Co ~-_. ~~_.(')oo~~~.'" -0"'<1>>-3-0 oo-~-..........~~~e~=3~_ _ a. ::::J ::J :'-"0 en ..... -. -'::::J:J -. -. ::r CD "0 .... '" ::r (') (') Q) 0 ~ -- - "' "':>CO _'" _t'D:J 3 (/) ~ o._~^. 030 _ctl ... ",:> 0..... --.ro ",'< _=;.('D _=-.=0 "'l .... -. cn~ CD --'-'O-::::J ::::J-'::J CD ~ - Oen ~_-""'~m~"" ~ ~ :::I !!: (") ~ ~ 5e. m <CI o:J 2:J.:;t'....... <CI UJ C (/) ~ - L,..,oIIII ;:1 ~."O ..... <..- 0' _ ~ - <n (JJ ..... 3 __ ft'l -~ oa.'<o::::J~::I oCO ~.m:J_ 0.'-'" '<cro_c;;(I)......~::rI>>;;r_........ ..", o~(JJ _....._ mm _~u::::J3~_.o~~ __ . C~:TQ)Om~Q)~amroa. ... ~ :; ;:;: (j) 3 ~ 3 en 3'<::E 0: a a to CD =':<"'0 0' Q) CD en or o' CD ';:< ;::+ Q.l US.:J (") -. m ~ g. 0; OJ -- CD =r -. C CD :E Q) ~..g 0 ? cr Q: (i) 3. -. - ..... .... CD Q. ~ "::::1 3 .... - CD :T cu .!D en iii' m <D 3' CO U) Oc:::J~cncu33.mg rom<CI0~~2~-'" Q) ::l-o~~ooenm<CIQ)~a-~w _ D) _ Q.l - Q) '" :> _ 3 -..... - CD -~ 0 -' 3 ......... c:n n.::r (0 CD I'\'l O-_-':JCD-'::::J-!J' 3tno((}c:J(')m~. c:: _-Q)~."O 03Q)uo(jjm~CD .., ~2:~'~~8;~Q~ ~~~~.~~;@~ ...~ gffi~3~~~5D~~~~m~a c: en ~_.w Q)c:nx(')o~ -._Q)N-.....Q)Q)_ __ ....Q) ro ..... ......::l<CIo::::Jw= ~ ~ '<::::J::I:E:J--oeD:Jg: =cn:JQ)Qcr<Dmo' - ::r3ro~Q)c(J)m<CICD::::J=+a.:< 0 Q)'"(Oo.cu;;:C/Jmmr.o crS'a.=3m...........::J ::: mo~ ~::l3'w_0'_w __ = xCUCD'<Q)w:JQ.lOoO CDW-O-'O-~Q):J '< <C:o~~a_.=o-.::r~!(/) ~ ~ 0...0 - ., ..... 0. 0 -. 0 ::::J::J c: W ::l - - -' - ::l m .... a..-o'l 3 ao.co~CD-'::r::l3 iO(')tn<CIiw~O -_-~~_wmo- ~::lW ~ = ;:::;: ;:; 3 UJ"O C,< (0 0'" =: 3 ~ I>> ~. = Co :f ~ 0 51 o' ~ ::r =- (/1 m ~ I>> CD ;:::;: (/) _~ C/J-'I>> mw.....mUJ-. mm ~m~""o- -0::r~I>>~wl>>::r3~l>>m . oam~a.-'~Q.l-o::l <",o~~~_,<am o~""'_3:>"3_",OCD~< ::l-CDm '""'I CD - <-'--C/)~ -<3-' - CD c"" -- w m - "'" - -t~ .... a. a. =r I>> m :J =- C - ~ !!!. 0 W - m (/) (,fI ~ c c:n (") - - 00 ~ o::l ~~ -.-. ~ ~a. (,fIQ)I~ '< -mm ~~...... ~:f 0'" (/) w~om- ~m< c3....~.3C/)-=< '" c:o. __ '<::::J_ ..... c""",m _.....D)~:J (ON _0--< CD W - -'0 m ...... m ""--<-Q)mmom--m "'trJtn(/),< ~ ::::J(") ..... ~(t)=. - ~ ""'3 '<- . 3' ~ men.... - - en m co:;; '< 0 . w :l: :> I>> (h '" -0 0 (h '" co -; -0 3 I>> 5' 0 3-''< 0" (jJ 0 -< () s: (f) "U () (fJ 0";;; -; - ~ ::r 0 a.. :T =r .... _ ::r 0 - =r -. _. '0 C 0 en () ::I 0 O. () cu t"D- -, m _:f ::s- O ~ 0. W ~ ~::r W:J ~ ~ .~::J U ~ :='''0 c: .... ro - c: 3 c ~ ::T :;!.. 3 w.~ 0' o~. CD -......'....m "'"\(1).... ......-............ -""'.....CD::r..... .c-.-o....::)...... co CD- c a:='- m CD ro...... CD ~ CD-g ~ 3 0 ~ a 0 -0 a. <' co W 3 < -0' 0 (JJ ~ 0. CD ~ c: X .J ~ ro g a 2.~. 3 ~. c ~ 0 3 e? ~-~ ~ ;ij a ~ CD ~ 0' ~ ~ CD ij) ~ ~ O"T1 ~"O 0 Q) Q) -g w -. - ~ 0 = ~ 3 "8 - en 3 CD i>>:f "0 CD re w -.. ("):;' -n po :0 CD' C w '< ~ .... ~ is: = 5 ffi ~ @ CT o'~. (I) 0- E:t ~ CD I>> ~ a. n ~ 3 jii-(Q cu -~. en 'E. 3 ~ (i) 0 -. -;--- "OCJ~2.en=5' CD::l~~ .....3~::r. co,<::;::r ~ ~tn~.~::;": ~~ (/)0. UJ en; _ w"'< _m__ (R"OCD '<::r .....::r"'<'O~w. j)o_....O. CD 0..0.... ~ '< --16 - 0 Cu CD ~ 0 ::I iD ~ €A 0 ~ ~ 0 C w:;. . 0'<;:::;: ~. en I - c: ,,.,, , - ,- ::) W -.. ::r 0 (JJ a ~co III CD w !'J 3 c: Ul C W cD w :::r S. (JJ: . 0 "0 I>> v' :::. - .. a >< 0 CD ~ W _. ..... :::t 01 ....... 8 m ~ 0 0 ::1 , <0 . C -'..' 3 0::1 -\3........- mCD'<(/)c< .owO <D 0 -.::::JQ)<DWCD...... 0_.. m m -- "'Q )( :J 0 a. 3 ~ c: 3 CD S. ..... ..0 :r: ..:< ' :J :;-t :J _ . (') ::l..: U') -g ~ ,^ -: o~ aco.......cncm'< w. w= 3c::l O!:e.C.)>a.CD' ~ ~. . ::1'< VI: "0 3 ~ Q) CD Q;l 0. ;l -i ::la.'~ I>> Q) ro ""'l CD CD - (/) CD (/). -- - .... : ______,,-- m '0 _ - .... :J ctl CD::r '" -. ::l- ..... ...... 3 (fJ m ::E CD m .J - ~ ~ . ::1.......o!Do-.< ~mQ)"E!. ~ro"o ~D)'o~o:E= C/)~ OJ:' ... '<'0- _::l~. ~Q) CD....CU o::),<m- w -..... I>> >::ro 0 ::r~~ :::t~_. C:_. O""'~ .....-. ~ w 0 - - m ..... 0 ,.... ~ --.. a. n - (J) .... f;A' ro ::l CD )(~O(l) ro~ 3+0 ~o m~~~~CD ~~ f;Af";Af;A: en~ m CD 0 9 ~ PJ a. CD Q;l 0 ..... _. ro j:IJ _ = :;' a m I\) ~ ~ ::r (0 0 ~::121w(tIm 03= mr>> u;Ul(i)<D"<O f>>~ :'-I!"J!J1 oce (D'C/)::JS,a. :E=~ :E:_CDOc......f\.) ~~~~ :E~ .... tn~ CD ::::Jo'O ::r~ClCa. ~~ ~-~(..) :::Jo .. -..... CD......... -",'I>>W ~ W\1) WSUl>>(J'I - ""\....... ::r.......::J a. (')0000:::- C/J (D<D ~ib~2. ~ "''''' :;;'"~s: 1>>a.-o"U .......,.. 0::::'" _.!:;-' ::l...........,- \JIII'...... ::l ~. . .. . =(0 CD g .. a.~. ~ ~ CD 0 (./)0 C/)Ulcn 0.-<:0 .emu......:? crCO"OCD "0.0< ~< ",::::J(t):) ~..... '< 0 ~ ro::r:;. CD ~::::J CD::r:::.. CD '0 CD '< 0 C <: ::::J <: CD W ::l -. c: ~ c"'O U> _ <: ...... CD -'''0 _:T ~. CD ~. Co{/) _. ::l n> ~ a. ~ "'0 (C _:::J < o (3 CD ::T re ~ '< 0 - CD n> 0 '<:J tn::1 ro C/'J a. :: 2t _ ~ - m w.<C I,." =: CT 3 (ii....... -. CD ~ Q;l .....:::J a.:E - (t) -.:J:::J C/) ~ C (t) c 3 -- -0 v, :E 0_ ....o~ OQ) _.w 0- .--..(Il.-+ "0 . :>'" . 3Ul ~...,ooro :>"'", o==;. a.:J(J)~ o::r C~ ~Q)3""" CD 3 - - (J) a. - -' - ~" - 0 .....::l 0 (h u - 0.-. -0 .,~", ~.- cmx < ~.oco ~ooa. <:'C CD 0. '-roo:>" - ..... tn - 0 C. - ..., < ~ u x - ""'l m < - - a. ~ _...._ o <:'. CD m :::J C a. ti). m m ~ CD -. - 3 a. I>> a. D):E ~""'::1 _ ....., _. < ~_.... co cr - - =. <D"" C/) ~ _ - 0 ::r _""0 su c s: m= l>>Ul"'O m-' Q)~. Q)~. ma.a <DO'" = m-::J- 0_ _j:lJ.....-:J o..:J -:l ..... ....m _.m Q)_c U)cr a.:::J 000(0 a. CDCO !e,Q)Q -0. ~.::J O'J_..... L.oooO'" . ([) 0 a. (') - 0 (I) :::::!: (fJ ~ 0 ---0 0 0 CD 0 c::: a ~ .-... CD m:T3_o .....,C/J .....::l(() o:;,tn::ro..<: l>> ~ c:n'!:2_ ~mmQ ~O' .gO' 3~ji) C:m ~Q) ~=~(J) ==- a. :::Jo.:Jc3eno ro..... a.(t)- "",,__.::::J(()cro:e ::a ...... 0 '" I>> :J . - ..... 3 ..... CD a; 0 =c.c .... CD ::r CD 0 m _ c: C c - m .;;: _ Q) ~ Q.l ""0 rr CD 3 a. ~ - ~ CD "0 ....c:n~ ~ _w 5'en::J CD.....m..(/)5.(t)~- ::J m :::J- ~Q)= oQ. Q)-o. C/)sa:).....CD<O'~ CD 0.. core 2:= 21 -&= (Om3 WCD~..g ..~. _ 0" -< "'0;- 0 1>>=, "'3., :>'" "'I>> 0)>:>" '< '< -CD oc/) 3 OCD -' -. 0.- 0.__ "Ctn()) ::r(Jj < J:)(/) ro)>::l :;:m(j; CD_ m.. (f) to (/) CD;- (t) p.. a.Q , ~o 5' 3 . ....,., ''''N'~,..."" "'r~'~l""'" 'l'.: ~....,.~:.,,,,,,,,~.:,. T"":'''''--- ~ \",~"""..... ',' ,I'''"'.'.".....,..''w....",".,.- ,., """,'" '...""...<"..' ."',""'.,,' (}'I ., 3'::!::e ;}"':e lC", :e III !!!..!I! > ", ~::t-.Ol'" > 0"'," 00 :l>O:e:e ..... 8 0 -. -. CD:T ~. o3mm;; <<~.... . . . (0-0 ffi(O -ffit'DO_o3cn....t. CD CD __0 OC~~SU1:J:r .....:::Jen""'l 0. 0 -':r ~~mzM>~m>-~aQi:r ~Ja~~~~m! :l.:JCDOcnp)O (I)-en 3 o.::s = l>> -0 ~o.o>-<a -<! - "~"'CDC"III0l3 -<o<<~iC: ~2.~:e ~ ~ a;..... Q) - ~ CD 3 -. m. 0-10 co~. ::. 3 s. - =_ en =(0(1) 10 (i;en....- CDQ.mO"_ 3::r.......:J 30. c:~ O::J:::TUli :To=:- lC3~3"'0.::T '" >_.Ol "'_..r+'<;.~ _I>> 8c:~P)....""=Uli 1>>-Q)05e~Q)C 2 :'-<ttmI>>UJ ~C~CD en:::;,co3: ~3(1)(n (J)a.- m_CD~.~9:- ~1!t:::Jo__o"'~ _[:J::J():::J0 5'lO :c ""'l _"O-~Y-:I: 8o::ra.::J ::1-0 o-c.0:e::r-8o . CD .....-0 0..3 o c -'- encco ~ a '" 0 = :e - Ol Ol jjl'lC ". -. (Ii '" C _ CD, a. _ III;~ ~ ~ '" :r(l)05' .~ 0 (J1.e!. <::I - S,\) -. :E 0 -(0 () en 0 =:. (/)......... 0. OJ 3 _ o .8 3 '" ",-"'8. C6 g a. ." (J) 8 ~ .. CD = Q) 3: . ~ c: cO- :E 5" il :5''0 :r 3 -"," III ~ffi'__ :::!:.l>>0 3(/)1>> o:r S?Ncn'::;:m'< 3:::J:Ts-. (i"CD ~ ! _.<e. Oy -:J ~mom ~g a."::3'3";,;~lg."T;:J 9..CD:!!~"~~<D;!! _ ..... Co(Q O::s... E:r yQ.::J ~ 'Dill " Ol -~ &'00-'- ~ "8-'0 <0'" () ""':e5~m Ol :::J -,,,, ::s c." - - in -t_ m::J - ::: 3 0.: (D .2. 3 ::E PJ a CD _ ~ ::r - ,,~ ~ DJ=:m => ffim 0 (Da~ ::J 05"0'00",= CD 3:1: 3 ~5. ::J woo " .... a ::J a ~ CD < - y::J "'C ::I CD _ Q 0 DJ _ m'< ~ _ CD ..... OJ -. ;"o.CDg: a. ::r _CD .....:+OCD=.::J(/) (n@"'C!!.3en.::JO: i'<CDJCD(Q =c:;:eD ...COO" l>- (I)::J (D 04-~DJ SU p)_ - fC -0 ="0 a. en o ::!.", 3 ~(io ~~ ~~;:]oa;' @ a:T9.:r~~";)oQ- -...... 0. "'C- oc5...,<n .g CO_ --...., -;:] en30.0 cu--';i (DOS>> !.0lQ).........a. () Ol", . 0) CD ? !..~2 ~o ~:J c;"l>>o""'4:r iiJ::J~g ~SD35" "";l. 0__ c:e -'., ~ 3 a. C" '" =1 :r::J < .,!!.:T SU ~ =i:J 0 ~S:...,cnQ)~::J"08 2:0~ m(JJ CD -- (I) <D - - :Jo (fJ COeD;; QJC(1) <C -.'" 3:e p..g.OtT C;; en ~ (Q Q) co 9' '< l:n-<CD =r:<::I co 3m o -. en.... . <il :-1' (/)-. . III " CD ..........-."'C ~ ~ ~~ ~ !!l. S-g ;} - - O-::J...d:li 3.:e -.8 0.0 en . . n~(")=!2:m ..., -'trOn CDo.<__m [8l~c;~ "SDJy ;:;:--':0 IV -'Q:m <_ ~ = _'< "< 0 _. o l>> "'c5c3!'" (ii.:;a......ur --c O::rO ....l.:J~J::JCD:r ... ::s _PJ P)y m -cn;~o .([) ~ - "'- s: Ol-- 3_ o =<<1:;:~ 0__:T::J -(()- ...,m _ctls'e>>t'O=: ~ CD [>-0 ::r..... 0 :j'- l>> 3: I m -'-<::Jee a. '<-"''''001 (D!.CD~g maoa. 0 - en!!...... --'_ (ilx~~a. ::JOCP)O::;: -.0 ;;r-'O ::r.:< ~'31>>~~'< o~2:!.~'"g. OJ co CD CD DJ ".,<il>"'~ o ... ;l.-<'" -'-,0 M><(jl':-'m ~CD 0.33 " =::!- 8~ OJ '8 p) m - -.", '" c:: cn(")8- ::!.cr~ 2:g?g ..., -... c "< - -;:]-::::) ::J::J ;::;"(00 0 a5S1JQ.::t8 . 0 ~o.'" co (') CD y ..... = _....,::J CD en ~,3= 3' :7 o.,0.~3", Oa.Q.nQ:::Ii ::Jrocn-CDO . -.. "'C g? <_::J - ~Oii ~"tJ ::::-.:<..... CD g ~a m _.gO ~" :ym-g 2.~ !!!. aDJ ~.(J) 00--::J_ U)_ ::rDJ > -. (i r :J ug ....., DJ 0 ~ ;0 '" ~ ~ 3-' !.g.p.."P~ 5" -~'" " ",'" a. ., C :J::r " 3 - " '" - '" . a. P- - III a. ., " .... .-. '.-- ..,..... <" .-.,-.... ", ':.' . ~ 869~1:~pg9 o,OO.UUIW 'PIOII~Olll ~,nos .nuo." PUOI\JOd DOLS , NI'I 'Snode9UU!1'I ~' ; '~I: PlaU4::>! M 99ll 'ON I!WJ9d OIVd . . 96elsod 's'n 10 ^~!::> 31"'lol >nne i .." n ~ . ,- _.. .. . -~.,...~ .... ,.~ I.., ..;.... "'i, ;! " I :j ~ , ~ C G) -- .. t: Ul Ul:l:u 4t'<iDl O~_. c: :tJ en IT1 Om m - n -I c:::cn3 =:: "CD 1>>"'- )> -I lEO_- GlGl " -I -I CD 0::1 n - :x: --'3m 0. ~~rn ~ !, '< -'" ce. ::I " - - 0 ." OUl"'O::l_'" c::lCD...ca.co r- Z ." ...CD"m c" .clEm-.UlCDO :tJ :t. c i ; 0' ... <no ...... CD C 0 CD -I )> (") Ul~ C03"Ul ...:...(0 ... Cri _.~ 0 clEO (;).3: o _. '< -< ::Im::l~m_c l"::I::;-=lDog: 0 0.8..;(2;m . c 8 CD m 2: ~ - -