The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCCP 02-08-1993 .'i- {Ille'. \.. . , /jl .. AGENDA L", ' *** REV I SED *** . (2/05/93) ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS MONDAY, FEBRUARY 8,1993,7:30 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDERIROLL CALL 7:30 P.M. 2. AGENDA ADOPTION 3. APPROY AL OF MINUTES FOR MEETING OF JANUARY 25 4. CONSENT CALENDAR a. Discussion of Ramsey County Turnback Issues. b. Adopt Res. No. 93-10 Approve Plans and Specifications and Authorize Advertisement for Bids for 1993 Pavement Management Improvements. (Copy for Review at City Hall). c. Approve Business Licenses and Rubbish Haulers. d. Adopt Res. No. 93-08 In Support of the Application for a Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) by Northwest Youth and Family Services (NYFS). e. Approve Agreement Between Ramsey County and the City regarding SCORE . Funding Recycling Grant. f. Proclamation - Declare the Week of February 8-14, 1993, as Child Passenger Safety Awareness Week. g. Approve List of Claims/Payroll. 5. PUBLIC COMMENTS 6. UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS A. Planning Commission: 1) Case #93-01 - Edgewater Estates, Supplemental PUD. B. Oak Grove Landfill Update - Attorney Jerry Filla. 7. COUNCIL COMMENTS 8. ADJOURN FEBRUARY MEETINGS MARCH MEETINGS February 10- Human Rights, 7:30 pm March 3 - Planning Comm, 7:30 pm February 15- HOLIDAY-PRESIDENT'S DAY March 8 - Council Meeting, 7:30 pm . February 16- Worksession, 4:30 pm March 10- Human Rights, 7:30 pm February 18- Public SaflWks, 7:30 pm March 18- Public SaflWks, 7:30 pm February 22- Council Meeting, 7:30 pm March 23- Parks/Rec Comm, 7:30 pm February 23- Parks/Rec Comm, 7:30 pm March 25- Finance Comm, 7:30 pm February 25- Finance Comm, 7:30 pm March 29- Council Meeting, 7:30 pm ,. ... a.J.IK~''L AGENDA ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEETING . COUNCIL CHAMBERS MONDAY, FEBRUARY 8, 1993, 7:30 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL 7;30 P.M. 2. AGENDA ADOPTION 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES FOR MEETING OF JANUARY 25 4. CONSENT CALENDAR a. Discussion of Ramsey County Turnback Issues. b. Adopt Res. No. 93-10 Approve Plans and Specifications and Authorize Advertisement for Bids for 1993 Pavement Management Improvements. (Copy for Review at City Hall). c. Approve Business Licenses and Rubbish Haulers. d. Adopt Res. No. 93-08 In Support of the Application for a Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) by Northwest Youth and Family Services (NYFS). e. Approve Agreement Between Ramsey County and the City regarding SCORE Funding Recycling Grant. f. Proclamation - Declare the Week of February 8-14, 1993, as Child Passenger Safety Awareness Week. . g. Approve List of Claims/Payroll. 5. PUBLIC COMMENTS 6. UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS A. Oak Grove Landfill Update - Attorney Jerry Filla. 7. COUNCIL COMMENTS 8. ADJOURN , FEBRUARY MEETINGS MARCH MEETINGS February 10- Human Rights, 7:30 pm March 3 - Planning Comm, 7:30 pm February 15- HOLIDAY-PRESIDENTS DAY March 8 - Council Meeting, 7:30 pm . February 16- Worksession, 4;30 pm March 10- Human Rights, 7:30 pm February 18- Public Saf/Wks, 7:30 pm March 18- Public Saf/Wks, 7:30 pm February 22- Council Meeting, 7:30 pm March 23- Parks/Rec Comm, 7;30 pm February 23- Parks/Rec Comm, 7;30 pm March 25- Finance Comm, 7:30 pm February 25- Finance Comm, 7;30 pm March 29- Council Meeting, 7:30 pm . ~ . CITY OF ARDEN HILLS ME2all\NDllM TO: Mayor and City Council ~,p FRQI: Dorothy A. Person, City 1ldmini.strator p DM'E: February 5, 1993 ~: City at!m;n;!Otrator's InfOJ:llllltion For council Meeting of 2/08/93 I. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: A. AIJaNISTRATIoo: 1. Local Government Pay Ebuitv ComPliance - The city was advised by OOER Commissioner Barton that Arden Hills is in c:onpliance with Pay Equity requirements. The next pay equity report is due 1/31/94. 2. Aooraisal Reports - 'Ihe City received appraisal reports from Davis & Iagennan, Inc. on the two parcels requested. 'Ihe Harstad property Round Lake vacant land was appraised at . $691,000. 'Ihe City of Arden Hills property on Highway 96 was appraised at $520,000. COmplete reports are available for your inspection in City offices. 3. Trade Area SpendinCl - Requests to. 5 of the 7 licensed charitable gambling organization (Light Brigade and Lions Club have conplied) to document 1992 trade area sperrling were issued. 4. Model stann Water ordinance - Enclosed find a Metropolitan Council "Model storm Water Management ordinance". As Arden Hills deliberates its own ordinance, this infonnation may be useful for background information. 5. Oak Grove UOOate - There is possible settlement of Consent Decree from the Federal Government that has been reviewed by Jerry Filla. He will update the Council on Monday, February 8 of the details. B. PCBLIC WCRXS: 1. MSA funds - MnOOI' has notified the city that the MSA fUl'X1s have been credited to Arden Hills for 1993 allotment include maintenance fUl'X1s of $50,041.00 and construction fUl'X1s of $150,124.00. Only $4,770 (MSA maintenance) of these fUl'X1s were budgeted in 1993, ha.-Jever, staff discussions are beirB held to identify possible 1993 MSA road maintenance and construction projects. . . . . City Mministrator's Infomation For Council MeetilIq of 2/08/93 Page Two 2. tJnde.rqroun::i Tank Removal Costs - Total costs f= tank removal am related contaminated soil remediation prcx::edures are estiInated at $22,839. nus estiInate assumes that the MPCA will accept the Envirornnental Engineer's recormnendation that no further actions are required. It is proposed that $5,774 be a=ued as an unWdgeted 1992 capital expenditure of the General Fund am $17,065 be set up as a 1993 Petrofurrl receivable. C. PIAIlNIm , zaaH;: 1- Arden Manor Mobile Horre Park - MWCC is firm in denanding payment be made for the 1200 SAC payments since 1/01/73. It appears that as older ill1its are removed am new units placed in the Park, the Park may pay back at current rates. MWCC wanted this to start in 1992. Filla suggests the City review their conditional use pennit to deteJ:1nine the necessity of a provision that obligates the Park to notify the City when a new horre is moved. A violation would be a misdemeanor. 2. Case #93-05 - Frlaewater Estates. Amended POD - Councilmember Hicks will not be in attendance at the February 8 regular meeting am has indicated he would prefer deferring action . on this matter ill1til the last meeting of the month. Cathy contacted Developer Paul Keleher to advise hiJn of the delay. Please note the developer does intend to make application f= the General Developnent Plan to be heard by the Planning Commission in March. This will include Rezoning, Amending POD am Final Plat, all of which require a public hearing. If Council has concerns regarding approval of the Concept Plan, please advise Monday so Cathy my delay publication of the Notice of Public Hearing. DAP Its Attaclnnents . , , . MINUTES CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING January 25. 1993 7:30 P.M. - City Hall CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Sather called to order the regular City Council meeting at 7:33 p.m. Present: Mayor Thomas Sather; Councilmembers Beverly Aplikowski, Dale Hicks, Paul Malone. Also present were: City Engineer, Mark Graham; Parks Director, John Buckley; Public Works Superintendent, Dan Winkel; City Accountant, Terry Post; Deputy Clerk/Zoning Administrator, Catherine Iago; Recording Secretary, Shar Foster. ADOPT AGENDA Note was made that Consent Agenda item "Approve List of Claims/Payroll" should be revised to read "Approve List of Payroll", . MOTION: Hicks moved, seconded by Malone, to adopt the January 25, 1993 agenda with the revision noted above. Motion carried unanimously (4-0) . APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MINUTES MOTION: Aplikowski moved, seconded by Malone, to approve the minutes of the January II, 1993 Regular Council Meeting as prepared. Motion carried unanimously (4-0) . CONSENT CALENDAR MOTION: Hicks moved, seconded by Aplikowski, to approve the Consent Calendar and authorize execution of all necessary documents contained t~erein. Mction carried unanimously (4-0). a . Approve 1993 Liquor License Renewal - Great Lakes Restaurant. b. Approve 1993 Business Licenses. c. Approve List of Payroll. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. . ---------- , 0 . Arden Hills Council 2 January 25, 1993 UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS 1993 PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENT: RESOLUTION NO. 93-08 - FEASIBILITY REPORT & PUBLIC HEARING RESOLUTION NO. 93-09 - PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS Within Council packets were copies of the Feasibility Report on the 1993 Pavement Maintenance Project. City Engineer Graham briefly summarized that the project consists of bituminous overlay and seal coat improvement on a number of City streets, based on ratings of the conditions of streets City-wide. He added that in accordance with the City's Assessment Manual, 50% of the bituminous overlay cost is proposed to be assessed to abutting property owners, while the City will pay the balance. Graham recommended Council adoption of Resolution 93-08 receiving the feasibility report and ordering a public hearing for March 8, 1993, and Resolution 93-09 ordering plans and specifications. . Mayor Sather commented that Council has reviewed and discussed this matter at length in Council worksessions. MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Hicks, to adopt Resolution 93-08 Receiving The Feasibility Report And Ordering A Public Hearing (March 8, 1993 at 7:30 p.m.) On The Improvement In The Matter Of The 1993 Pavement Maintenance Improvement. Motion carried unanimously (4-0). MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Aplikowski, to adopt Resolution 93-09 Ordering Preparation of Plans And Specifications In The Matter of The 1993 Pavement Maintenance Improvements. Motion carried unanimously (4-0). REVIEW FEASIBILITY REPORT - T.H. 51/0LD SNELLING AVENUE There were 80 - 90 citizens present to hear and/or participate in discussion regarding the closure of T.H. 51/01d Snelling Avenue. Mayor Sather announced that there was a register to be signed by anyone wishing to speak, and speakers were asked to limit their comments to two minutes; a few minutes was allowed for the register to circulate. . City Engineer Graham explained that he serves as the City Engineer, and he and other representatives of the City met with the State Department of Transportation (MnDOT) ln . Arden Hills Council 25, 3 January 1993 November 1992 to discuss the matter of the closure of the T.H. 51/0ld Snelling Avenue intersection. Graham reported that at the November meeting, there were four options recognized with regard to the intersection: Option 1 Do nothing, leaving the intersection closed permanently. Option 2 Create a frontage road and redesign the intersection including traffic signalization. Option 3 Create a frontage road along Snelling to Lydia, (which would invc1ve wetland issues and participation by the City of Roseville). Option 4 Widen/redesign County Road E bridge/intersection Graham stated that tonight's meeting is the forum for receiving input, then Council will determine what options they wish to pursue, if any. Deputy Clerk Iago called names from the register in the order they were listed. Following is a synopsis of each speaker's comments/questions (not verbatim). . Tom Fabel, 1550 Edqewater Avenue - My concern is the unsafe condition that existed prior to the closure of the intersection and the many deaths which occurred at that location. The death of a Mounds View High School student was the final straw, after which I, my brother Phil Fabel, and some Mounds Views Senior High students drafted a letter to the Attorney General pleading for review of the intersection, stressing that if no action were taken, there could very likely be a case of negligence against the government entity responsible for the intersection. The Attorney General's office took steps which eventually culminated in the cl osure of the intersection. I'm not sure which options being considered might be acceptable, but I oppose returning the intersection to its former situation as it was intolerable from a safety standpcint. I believe the City of Arden Hill s would be liable if the intersection were returned to the former situation, and I am presenting a letter to Council stating that position, as well as a petition signed by 19 Rotary club members supporting keeping the intersection at least as safe as it is today. Tom Mulcahy, 3530 Siems Court - I believe that some time ago, this intersection was changed from an "x" design to a "right angles from both sides" design based on MnDOT's . recommendation that the "X" design was uD.2,afe; however, what MnDOT created has now been closed because it is now deemed unsafe. I object to an influential person in the community using their relationship with a person of power, such as the situation with Tom Fabel and the Attorney General, because . Arden Hills Council 4 January 25, 1993 this does not provide for due process. Now the Council and MnDOT are faced with an impossible situation because no matter what takes place, it is likely that some lawyer may accus e the City of negligence. Linda Swanson, 1124 Inoerson Road - I thank the Council for this open meeting as I have only heard about other meetings on this subject after they have occurred. I'm opposed to the options presented on the grounds that they are unsound. To my knowledge, local police and fire departments have not voiced their concerns for safety at this intersection. A signalized intersection would be detrimental to the existing neighborhood by creating more traffic, air pollution, and noise pollution, in addition to being very costly. The only reason which has been given to reopen the intersection is to provide for more convenience. If the intersection is opened, noise barriers will be necessary. Tom Lynch, 3220 North Hamline - I have lived within 800' of this intersection for 27 years and have dealt with this issue many times in the past. Seven people have been killed during those 27 years, even after realignment and the . installation of a traffic signal at Lydia/Snelling. The speed limit of Snelling is the same as a freeway, which is very inappropriate, in fact, the area is so dangerous that I began avoiding the intersection before it was closed. Phil Fabel. 3426 G1enarden Court - Since 1971 , this is the third time this matter has come up. No one should profess to know more about the matter than MnDOT; MnDOT has made their position clear by closing the intersection, and that action should stand. David Webster, 3529 Sne1linq - I have lived in the area for 15 years and witnessed tremendous growth in the area. Since the intersection closure, the area seems much safer, particularly for children. I was involved in an accident at this intersection, and I understand the inconvenience posed by the closure of the intersection, but I feel it is worth the added safety. Todd Albertson, 1543 Glenhil1 Road - I moved to the area in 1963 and have witnessed many accidents at this inter-section. I represent the Arden Hills Three Association and all eight people within the Association are opposed to the service road option. I believe reopening the intersection would be a fatal mistake. Kay Reyerson, 3201 Ridqewood Road - I echo the comments of . earlier speakers and favor any measure that will make a safer neighborhood. I am particularly concerned about the frontage road option as I beli eve it would endanger wetland . Arden Hills council 5 January 25, 1993 areas. I urge Council to keep the intersection closed and not approve any major project. Raminik Shah, 1435 Bussard Court - I am opposed to permanent closure of the intersection and don't think the number of accidents experienced is atypical. I would support a realigned intersection perhaps with traffic signalization. It is impossible to close all intersections because there have been accidents there. Chuck Kelly, 1430 Lametti Lane - I represent a number of families with regard to this matter who do not wish to experience further deaths, thus support keeping the intersection closed. (Using a overhead projector, Me Kelly presented evidence, copies of which were in Council packets, supporting his position.) According to the state's study of semaphores, a traffic signal will actually increase the frequency of severe accidents at this particular type of intersection. Reopening the intersection may expose the City to liability should another serious accident occur. A traffic signal will result in significant increase in noise and air pollution. Daily traffic counts continually . increase on Highway 51. Ambulance and Fire Department access has not been affected by the intersection closure according to the City's Public Works Superintendent and Health One Ambulance. According to Ramsey County Traffic and MnDeT, there has been an insignificant increase in traffic count on County Road E since closure of the intersection. The petition requesting reopening of the intersection does not reflect. City-wide sentiment; a survey or vote would be the only way of determine City-wide opinion. A traffic signal at the intersection has been considered before and rejected by MnDOT. Joe Kahnke, 1541 Edqewater Avenue - The thing that is being totally overlooked is the fact that our area is becoming urbanized and we need to slow down traffic rather than cut off traffic routes. The signal at Lydia/Snelling helps somewhat, but a 55 mph speed limit lS not appropriate for T.H. Sl/Snelling. I see nothing wrong with a signalized intersection and believe it would be effective, but I also believe many past accidents have been caused by speed rather than roadway design. It is not reasonable that long-time residents have their access cut off. Jean Lemberq. 1401 Skil ~s Lane - I support opening the intersection in the safest way possible. I am frustrated that the intersection was closed in a dubious manner. There . is no way to close all intersections where accidents have occurred. If MnDOT 1S open to the option of full signalization and approach warning lights, that should be a safe way. I , too, am heartsick about past fatalities, . Arden Hills council 6 January 25, 1993 however, some things mentioned during this evening's discussion are not relevant. School buses did not use the intersection for many years before its closure because they identified the unsafe circumstances, but the School Board has indicated buses would use a signalized intersection. I've heard that a cost sharing arrangement between the City, County, and State is a possibility. MnDOT is the expert in this matter and they are not opposed to reopening the intersection with a safer design. Janeen Kaler, 1434 West County Road E - Convenience alone is not a valid reason to open the intersection. It should be opened safely, not in its former design. It is Council's duty to the citizens of the city to consider reopening the intersection in a safer design. John Swanson, 1468 Lametti Lane - I favor some sort of access, but not a traffic signal. County Road E and other alternate routes are inadequate to handle diverted traffic load or pedestrian/bike traffic. Volume and speed of traffic were the primary concerns surrounding the former intersection. There is no method to reduce volume, only . divert it, however, we can try to reduce the speed on old Snelling/T.H. 51, then traffic controls could be added. Georqe Morse. 1540 Edqewater Lane - I moved to this area three years ago, and because of safety concerns, stopped using the intersection even before it was closed. The intersection should not be reopened in its former design and a 1/2 million dollar cost to reopen it in a safe design is a very high price to pay for convenience. The best option is to do nothing other than perhaps try to reduce the speed. Ray McGraw, 1427 Bussard Court - (Gave background as to the creation of the Snelling/T.R. 51 and County Road E intersections.) MnDOT closed the intersection without due process moving the traffic to other routes. citizens have been denied the right to a safe and convenient access and emergency response time has been negatively impacted which could result in deaths ln other ways. Let's not make any further mistakes, let's build a safe and sane intersection. Mary Miller. 3505 Glenarden Road - There is a problem with emergency response time now that the intersection is closed. Because of the closing of the T.H. 51/Snelling intersection, we are forced to use alternate routes to access our residences. Recently, I was caught in a traffic jam created by an accident around one of the alternate routes which . would have made emergency response impossible if emergency response wcu1d have been needed in my neighborhood. The former intersection was dangerous, a redesigned intersection is appropriate, simply closing an access is inappropriate. ----------- . Arden Hills Council 7 January 25, 1993 Brad LemberG, 1401 skil es Lane - I have many years experience as a municipal engineer myself, and I resent the manner in which this intersection was closed without due process. The public should be aware that the signals which are now at Lydia/Snelling were originally bid for the T.H. 51/Snel1ing intersection, but a decision was then made not to install them at that location. In my opinion as a traffic engineer, County Road E is a very poor alternate route and traffic around Lake Johanna is unsafe. There is no provision for pedestrian or bike traffic to cross T.H. 5l. Noise barrier walls aloLg highways have proven to be ineffective. Money is available through MSA funds to improve the intersection. Right-ot-way was originally purchased for a diamond intersection and that is what should be designed by a professional. We need a replacement. Pauline Haas, 1420 West County Road E - I've heard rumor that the people on County Road E are pushing to reopen the intersection, but as one of those residents, I want to report that we want a safe intersection to service the entire community. A vital artery has been closed without due process and now there is additional safety concerns . along County Road E. For the whole community, we want an intersection; .~ a signalized, redesigned intersection is 1. found to be a good alternative, let's do it. Clifford Nimis, 1485 Glenhill Road - Accidents at the for-mer intersection were the result of speed on the roadway. Primari I y, we need to reduce speed so there is 1 ess chance of serious accidents. Mayor Sather announced that Council has received a number of pieces or correspondence and staff has also maintained a list of resident phone calls expressing various positions on this matter. Councilmember Aplikowski stated that she shares the concern regarding the sp~ed of traffic on this roadway in addition to the poor design of the intersection. She stated that she would favor order-lng a feasibility study to determine if a new intersection with reduced speed is a viable ?ossibi1ity. Counci1member Malone recapped the background surrounding this issue, and stated that the City I eft it to MnDOT's discretion whether or not to close the intersection after the last fatality. He added that options for reopening have been considered, and although it is out of the question to reopen the intersection in its former design, perhaps there . is a safer design for reopening the intei..-section. He said that since this matter involves main roads, in the interest of circulation of traffic, it would be prudent to examine the options, . Arden Hills Council 8 January 25, 1993 Councilmember Hicks echoed the comments of Counci1members Ap1ikowski and Malone, stating that an improved design for the reopening of the intersection needs to be investigated thoroughly. Mayor sather stated that if the only options were to open the intersection in its former design or close it permanently, he would derinitely close it permanently. He added that he is not convinced that any of the options presented will be "safe havens", and although it may be difficult to reduce speed, it is worth investigating that possibility. sather said it appears that counci 1 consensus is to review the options fot" a redesigned intet"section and keep the intersection closed in the interim. He added that it would be appropriate to report that position to MnDOT and send MnDOT a copy of the minutes or this meeting. MOTION: Hicks moved, seconded by Aplikowski, to dit"ect the City Engineer to investigate all possible options for the T.H. 51/Snelling intet"section for Council consideration . at their February 22, 1993 regular meeting. Motion carried unanimously (4-0). There was a comment from the floor that. perhaps there are int.erest.ed cit.izens who would be willing t.o facilitate a committ.ee to discuss this matt.er wit.h MnDOT. Mayor Sather responded t.hat there could be a worksession to review that matter after the City Engineer's report is revie'"ed. A citizen suggested conducting any future meetings on this subject at a location large enough to accommodate the number of people likely to attend. Sather said staff could try to make those arrangements. Jean Lemberg said many informational meetings have taken place on this issue, the options have been published for months, now it is time to take ~. Councilill02mbec aC...1.on. Aplikowski st.ated that some kind of acti on will likely be determined soon, but the public must keep in mind that funding must be available for a redesigned intersection. Mayor Sattee- asked the public to follow up by showing MnDOT and the County the desires of the community. He stated t.hat an intersection imp~ovement . ~ could require the proJecc pledging of many years' MSA funds. Sather clarified that, barring any unforesee~ problems, . Counci 1 will be considering the City Engineer's findings at their regular Council ~. on February 22, 1993 at 7:30 rnee ~.l ng p. In. / at a location to be announced (probably Mounds View or Valentine Hills School) . ---- ---- , . Arden Hills Council 9 January 25, 1993 while the assembly departed, Council recessed and then reconvened. DRAFT STORM WATER UTILITY City Engineer Graham explained that he has provided Council with a sample ordinance relating to the establishment cf a surface storm water runoff managpment utility, a sample resolution to establish policy on the operation of the utility, and a sample resolution to establish utility ratps. Graham stated that the substance of the sample ordinance and resolutions was largely provided by City Attorney Filla and is very similar to what is in use by the City of Shoreview. Graham suggested that conducting an informational meeting would be appropriate before adopting the ordinance and resolutions even though the matter is not expected to be controversial. He commented that it is possible the utility could be in place for the second utility billing quarter of 1993. He added that Council will need to consider how the storm water utility would be administered to undeveloped and . underdevelcped property. Consensus of Council was that staff should compile a complete package of information and recommendations on this matter to be considered at the next Council worksession. MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Hicks, to accept the draft storm water utility report, 2nd to direct staff to refine all details of the report and prepare recommendations with regard to undeveloped and underdeveloped property for Council consideration at their February 16, 1993 worksession. Motion carried unanimously (4-0). RESOLUTION 93-07 - AWAIR BILL Parks Director Buckley reported that Minnesota's Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA), signed into law in May 1973, requires all workplaces with 50 or fewer employees to be in compliance by July 1, 1993. I\s part of that compliance, he recommended the City: 1) Review the AW"IR act (A Workplace Accident/Injury Reduction Program), 2) Review the City Employee Safety and Health Policy, 3) Review the AWAIR indiCators, and . 4) Demons t ra te di recti on and support by adopt ing Resolution 93-07. , . Arden Hills Council 10 January 25, 1993 Councilmember Malone asked if the budgeted amount of $7,250 is adequate to do all that is required to comply with law. Buckley said he anticipates the budget is adequate for compliance with both OSHA and AWAIR. Public Works Superintendent Winkel commented that in past years, steps have been taken and funds have been spent on equipment, etc. in an effort to comply with OSHA standards. MOTION: Hicks moved, seconded by Malone, to adopt Resolution No. 93-07 Recognizing The Need For Safety In The Workplace Per The AWAIR Bill. Motion carried unanimously (4-0) . COUNCIL COMMENTS There were no Council comments. ADJOURN MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Aplikowski, to adjourn the meeting at 9:42 p.m. Motion carried unanimously (4-0) . . Thomas R. Sather, Mayor Dorothy A. Person, Clerk Administrator NOTICE OF MEETINGS: The next regular Council meeting will be held February 8, 1993 at 7:30 p.m. at City Hall. The next Council worksession will be held Tuesday, February 16, 1993 at 4:30 p.m. (Monday, February 15 is President's Day holiday) . . , City of Arden Hills . Ramsey County, Minnesota RESOLUTION 22. ..!.9 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING THe ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS IN THE MA TIER OF THE 1993 PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution 23. -~, the Project Enginecr has prepared plans and specifications (or the 1993 Pavement Maintenance Improvements, which plans and specifications have been reviewed by the City; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arden Hills, Minnesota: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporatcd herein by this reference, are hereby approved. 2. The City Administrator shall prepare and obtain the publication of an advertisement for bids for the making of the improvement pursuant to the attached plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published once each week for three . consecutive weeks, shall specify the work to be done, and shall state that the bids will be received by the City Administrator until 10:00 A.M. on March 3, 1993, at which time the bids will be publicly opened in the Council chambers of thc City Hall by the City Administrator and the Project Engineer and will thcn be tabulated for consideration by the City Council at a meeting thereof at 7:30 O'clock p.m. on March 8, 1993, in the City Council chambers at City Hall. No bids will be considered unless scaled and filed with the City Administrator and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond, or certified check payable to the City Administrator in the amount of 5,0% of the amount of such bid. Passed and adopted this 8th day of February, 1993. 'Fhomas R. Sather, Mayor ATTEST: . Dorothy A. Person, City Administrator 039.Ql02.Fl!B . rIt/iI.;;' rJiiI- co'",,"". ".0"" Maier Stewart & Associates Inc. February 5, 1993 File: 520-039-20 Ms. Dorothy Person City Administrator City of Arden Hills 1450 West Highway 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112 RE: 1993 PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS . Dear Ms. Person: The plans and specifications for the 1993 Pavement Maintenance Improvements have been completed and a copy is attached. Public Works Supervisor Winkel and myself have met to discuss these improvements. As the City Council has requested, the plans and specifications should be kept available in the office for their review. It is the Council's direction to not provide a set of plans and specifications for each council packet. Bids for the project are due on March 3, 1993. We will take care of the advertisement of bids in the New Brighton Bulletin and the Construction Bulletin. The estimated construction cost of the project is $105,200 and the estimated project cost, including 15% overhead, is $123,700. Thc public hearing for this improvemcnt, as established by Resolution 93-08, is sct for March 8, 1993. It will be necessary for your staff to properly notice those properties proposed for assessments. . Ol9-1Il1lUob 1959 SLOAN PLACE, SUITE 200. ST. PAUL. MINNESOTA 55117 612.774-6021 9600 SHELARD PARKWAY. SUITE 102, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55441 612.546.0432 . Equal OpPortu""y Employer . . Ms. Dorothy Person . February 3, 1992 Page Two Please find attached a resolution for Council review and consideration at the February 8, 1993 meeting. This resolution approves the plans and specifications and orders advertisement for bids. Terry Maurer will be in attendance at the February 8, 1993 meeting should there by any questions on this matter. Sincerely, ~ ~TE:;~:;~=. me. Mark 1. Graham, P.E. M:rG/jm Attachment . . 009-<)201. rob 1993 BUSINESS LICENSES FeR APPROV1\L BY CXJUNCIL M THE RElGULl'<R CITY CXJUNCIL MEm'ING OF FEBRll1lRY 8. 1993. . Nl\ME OF BlJSINESS TYPE OF LICENSE AMERICAN FAMILY INS. 2 SIGNS ANDERSON/OSPINA ca!PANY SIGN ARDEN OFFICE CENl'ER 2 SIGNS OIIIDREN'S loKlRlD LEARNING CENl'ER 2 SIGNS, RESTAURANT CARDIAC PACEMAKERS 3 SIGNS, RESTAURANT, VElIDING MACHINE alNTROL DATA <XlRPORATION RESTAURANT, 3 SIGNS EMT SIDE BEl/ERAGE COPANY SIGN FAIRWAY OUIIXlOR ADVERI'ISING 3 SIGNS (BILIIDARDS) '!HE GOODPRINTER SIGN Il\ND 0 'LAKES RESTAURANT, 4 SIGNS NORm: HEIGHTS WllIERAN aJ.URaI 4 SIGNS NORIHWESI'ERN <XlLLEGE RESTAURANT, REI'AIL SALES Rl\MADA INN/MCGUIRES 3 SIGNS, RESTAURANT, 156 HOI'EL ROCMS '!WIN CITY PEl' NORIH REI'AIL SALES, SIGN . . 1993 RUBBISH IDWLER LICENSES FCR APPRO\1AL BY CXl(J!CIL AT THE REGllIJ\R CITY CXl(J!CIL MEETIm OF FEBRIlARY 8. 1993. . Nl\ME OF RUBBISH HADLER AAGARD SANITATION ACE SOLID WASI'E INC. BFI/ACI'ION DISPOSAL BELlAIRE SANITATION, INC. EASY CARl' INC. GALI.l\GHER'S SERVICE, INC. JOHNSON SANITATION NORIHERN DISPOSAL, INC. PEI'ERSON BROS SANITATION RAY ANDERSON & SONS RED ARROO '!WIN CITY SANITATION VASKO RUBBISH REMJVAL WALTER I S RUBBISH WASl'Em, INC. WJ:llHlOD SANITATION w:xJDlAKE SANITARY SERVICE . . . 6 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS . RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 93-08 A RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF THE APPLICATION FOR A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBGl BY NORTHWEST YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES (NYFSl WHEREAS, NYFS has provided essential developmental services for the youth and families of Arden Hills since 1976, and WHEREAS, NYFS has provides these services to the residents of Arden Hills regardless of the ability to pay, and WHEREAS, the unique partnership between NYFS and its ten Ramsey County member cities has resulted in the ability to provide an essential community service that none of the cities could provide individually. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Arden Hills enthusiastically supports the award of a 1993 CDBG to NYFS. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS THIS 8TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1993. . THOMAS R. SATHER, MAYOR ATTEST: DOROTHY A. PERSON, CITY ADMINISTRATOR . . 131,'27,/93 09:52 HI,J YOUTH 8. FAM ILl' SEpt) ICES 110.054 1;102 Northwest Youth & Faml!y' SelVlces Rush Lake Business Park. 1775 Old Highway 8 . New Brighton. MN 55112 . Telephone 636,5448 1 January 26, 1993 City of Arden Hills Dorothy Person, City Administrator 1450 West Highway 96 Arden HillS, MN 55112 Dear city Manager and Council Persons: Northwest Youth and Family service is applying for Ramsey county CDSO funding for 1993 to assist with the funding for the mental health programs. As we are all aware, more and more people are finding themselves in need of assistance without insurance. We are aware that you, as cities, do not have additional resources to cover any of these additional expenses I which leads us to finding . different, creative ways of trying to be fiscally responsible and meet the needs of people in our communities. What we would like from you is a resolution of support for our seeking and receiving CDSG funding for our mental health services. The deadline for this grant is February 12, so if your council could take action on this as soon as possible that would be very helpful. If you need any additional information, please let me know. We do have a new FAX number, 636-1584 so feel free to use this as a way of communicating with me regarding any action you have taken. Thanks for your on going help and support of our efforts. Sincerely, (~~ ~/\,/h",'r/(..JC.,c",~ KAY Z. ANDREWS, LICSW EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR KZAjjmk . - -- -~ _ 0 .~... .It^ ~ '::1 6..>'1-...-..,," . ':',I".,(.;\-II?\>,' a' __L'L' , ) . AGREEMENT BETWEEN RAMSEY COUNTY AND ARDEN HILLS FOR A SCORE FUNDING RECYCLING GRANT This Agreement is made this 8th day of Feb. , 1993, between Ramsey County through the Public Health Department ( the "County" ) and Arden Hills ( the "Municipality") . WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, The County has established policies and plans supporting curbside recycling as part of an overall waste abatement program; and WHEREAS, The Municipality supports curbside recycling and has entered into a Joint Powers Agreement with Ramsey County for funding of a recycling program serving residents of the Municipality which includes curbside collection of recyclables; and WHEREAS, The County will be collecting funding for recycling programs from the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as SCORE funds, which, in part, provide for the funding of recycling services; and WHEREAS, The Municipality has established an in-house recycling program pursuant to Minn. Stat. lISA.lSl; and . WHEREAS, The Municipality has requested SCORE funds from the County to support its recycling program; NOW, THEREFORE, The County and Municipality mutually agree as follows in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein: 1- OBLIGATIONS a. Reimbursement 1- The Municipality is obligated to provide curbside recycling as agreed to in the Joint Powers Agreement between the Municipality and Ramsey County for funding residential recycling. 2 . The Municipality is required to credit the County and the State of Minnesota's SCORE fund as funding sources in any public education materials. 3. The Municipality shall use the SCORE funds as specified by the Joint Powers Agreement dated November 19, 1991- 4 . The Municipality shall receive two payments from the County for recycling funds. The first distribution shall occur by February 28, 1993 and shall be in the amount of $9,724.50. The second distribution shall be by May 31, 1993, and shall be for $9,724.50. . f , The Municipality shall not use grant funds for expenses, or a . portion of expenses, which have been or will be reimbursed by other parties. Reimbursement is contingent upon the County receiving SCORE funds from the State of Minnesota. In the event that SCORE funds actually received by the County are less than the amount budgeted by the County, the amount of the grant to the Municipality will be reduced in proportion to the population of the Municipality. b. Reports l. The Municipality shall submit four reports to the County. The first is due to the County on April 15, 1993, the second report is due on July 15, 1993, the third is due on October 15, 1993, and the fourth is due on February 1, 1994. The report due April 15, 1993 will include program information for January 1 through March 31, 1993. The second report will include information for April 1 through June 30, 1993. The third report will include program information for July 1 through September 30, 1993. The fourth report will cover the period from October 1 through December 31, 1993. 2. The reports shall be submitted on forms provided by the County. c. Financial Report l. The Municipality shall submit a letter which certifies that . SCORE funds have been used pursuant to the Joint Powers Agreement and this Agreement. That letter shall be included in the report due February 1, 1994. 2 . The Municipality shall be required to submit, if requested by the County, an audited financial report to the Ramsey County Budget and Accounting Office. The report shall show how funds received from Ramsey County were disbursed. 2. TERM The term of this agreement shall be from January 1, 1993 through December 31, 1993, the date of signatures notwithstanding. 3. CANCELLATION Either party may cancel this Agreement at any time upon thirty (30 ) days written notice to the other party. In the event of termination, the Municipality shall be entitled to reimbursement for those expenses incurred up to the termination date, provided the expenses have been incurred according to the budget shown in Attachment A. . I . 4. DEFAULT Any of the following shall constitute default on the part of the Municipality: a. The failure of the Municipality to use funds in a manner consistent with this Agreement and Attachment A. b. The failure of the Municipality or its (sub)contractor(s) to use their best efforts to ensure the maximum collection and marketing of recyclable materials from the area served. c. The failure of the Municipality to provide information satisfactory to the County as required in this Agreement. S. GENERAL CONDITIONS a. All services and duties performed by the Municipality pursuant to this Agreement shall be performed to the satisfaction of the County and in accordance with all applicable federal, State, and local laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations as a condition of payment. The Municipality agrees that it will comply with all federal, State, and local statutes and ordinances relating to nondiScrimination. . b. The Municipality shall at all times be an independent contractor and shall not be the employee of the County for any purpose. The County shall not be responsible for the payment of any taxes, either federal or State, on behalf of the Municipality, nor shall the County be responsible for any fringe benefits. No Civil Service or other rights of employment will be acquired by virtue of Municipality's services. c. The Municipality and County mutually agree to defend, hold harmless, and indemnify the other party, its officials, agents, and employees, from any liability, loss, or damage they may suffer as a result of demands, claims, judgments, or costs arising out of or caused by the indemnifying party's negligence in the performance of their respective obligations under the provisions of this Agreement. This provision shall not be construed nor operate as a waiver of any applicable limits of or exceptions to liability set by law. d. All data created, collected, received, maintained, or disseminated for any purpose in the course of this Agreement is governed by the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 13 ( 1990) , any other applicable State statute, or any State rules adopted to implement the Act, as well as federal regulations on data privacy. The Municipality agrees to abide by these statutes, rules, and regulations. . I e. All books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and . practices of the Municipality and its (sub)contractor(s), if any, relative to this Agreement are subject to examination by the County and the State Auditor, as appropriate, in accordance with the provisions of Minn. Stat. 16B.06, Subd. 4 (1990) . f. All equipment purchased using funds provided in this Agreement shall remain the property of the Municipality. g. Any amendments to this Agreement shall be in writing and signed by both parties. IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties have subscribed their names as of the date first above written. RAMSEY COUNTY CITY OF ARDEN HILLS By By Chair, Ramsey County Board THOMAS R. SATHER, Mayor Approved: Approved as to Form: By By Chief Clerk Municipality Attorney . JEROME P. FILLA Approved as to Form: By By Assistant County Attorney Clerk-Treasurer DOROTHY A. PERSON Insurance Approved: By Risk Manager Funds are available, code: By Budget and Accounting Recommended: By Director, Public Health Department . . . ATTACHMENT A .lI.RDEN HILLS SCORE FUNDING GRANT BUDGET ADMINISTRATION: $ 8,440.00 PROMOTION ACTIVITIES: $ 4,825.00 (DETAIL ) Brochures, fliers, EQUIPMENT: $ 670.00 (DETAIL) Office supplies and recycling bins COLLECTION OF RECYCLABLES: (DETAIL ) $63,865.00 . TOTAL: $77,800.00 SCORE: $19,449.00 . . PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, February 8.14, 1993. has been declared Child Passenger Safely Awareness Week~ WHEREAS, more children in the United States are killed and crippled in car crashes than from any other cause of injury, WHEREAS, when used correctly, child safety seats are 71 percent effective in preventing fatalities. and 67 percent effective in preventing serious injury; WHEREAS, 247 children age four and under were saved in 1991 by child passenger safety restraints, and 1,793 children were saved from 1982 to 1991; WHEREAS, if child safety seats were used by all children under age five, an estimated 49,000 serious injuries and 455 lives would be saved each year; WHEREAS, all 50 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico have enacted laws requiring the use of child passenger protection syste lUS; WHEREAS, many child safety seats are misused in some ways. and correcl placemenl and harnessing is critical to ensure adequate protect.ion; WHEREAS, death and injury may be significantly reduced through greater public awareness, information, education, and enforcement; . NOW, THEREFORE, I. THOMAS R. SATHER, MAYOR OF THE CITY OF ARDEN lliLLS, MINNESOTA, in recognition of every child's right to adequate protection when being IransJX)ned in a motor vehicle, hereby proclaim the week of February 8-14, 1993. as Child Passenger Safety Awareness Week and encourage the community to observtl the week with appropriate programs. ceremonies and activities 10 increase awareness of correctly using child car safety seals to protect. against the risk of death or injury on every ride. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY TIlE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS THIS ll'fH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1993. lHOMAS R. SAlHER. MAYOR ATTEST: DOROlHY A. PERSON CIlY ADMINISTRATOR . ... , . ~~-:J-. CONSULTING ENGINEERS Maier Stewart & Associates Inc. MEMO TO: Dorothy Person, City Administrator FROM: Terry Maurer & Mark Graham Jll/t A1C-- DATE: January 15, 1993 RE: Council Worksession Update 520-039-10 520-030-70 520-042-70 520-043-70 As per your request of January 14, 1993, the following information is provided for discussion at the January 20, 1993 Council Worksession. A. 1993 Pavement Manai:!ement Proi:!ram (520-039-10) The feasibility study will be presented at the January 25, 1993 Council meeting. The study discusses the seal coat and overlay improvements for streets discussed at the last workshop. Two resolutions will be presented for review and consideration by the . Council. The first resolution will accept the feasibility study and order a public hearing. The second resolution will order preparation of plans and specifications. This is a similar procedure as followed in previous year's projects. B. Snellinl? Avenue Median Closure (520-030-70) An eleven page letter, dated January 14, 1993, is attached. This letter details two alternatives in providing an outlet for Snelling Avenue to Trunk Highway No. 51 (T.H.51). The first alternate would realign Snelling Avenue to match the intersection of T.H. 51 and Hamline Avenue, at an estimated project cost of approximately $428,000. The second alternate would provide a frontage road from Snelling Avenue to the south to Lydia Avenue, at an estimated project cost of $393,700 plus wetland mitigation and right-of-way acquisition. Should the Council chose to move forward with this project, we would recommend the first a1temate. We have received a number of phone calls and copies of correspondence regarding tRis matter, with opinion split between providing a new opening and leaving the intersection closed. We anticipate a large turn out at the January 25, 1993 council meeting regarding this matter. The options we see that the City Council has following discussion at the January 25, . 1993 Council meeting are: 1959 SLOAN PLACE. SUITE 200, ST PAUL, MINNESOTA 55117 612-774-6021 9800 SHELARD PARKWAY. SUITE 102. MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55441 612.546-0432 . Equal Opportunity Employer . CITY OF ARDEN HILLS JANUARY 15, 1993 PAGE TWO 1. Vote to set a date for an informational hearing to solicit further public input. Given the number of concerned residents, the Council may want to consider a meeting date with this issue as the only item. 2. Choose one of the alternates, pass a resolution to pursue the opening and direct City staff to proceed with the next step in the MnDOT process, which would be to order a feasibility study. 3. Pass a resolution to leave the median closed and conclude discussion on the matter. C. Storm Water Utility (520-042-70) City Planner Berg1y has provided an updated summary of land uses and areas within the City, which are necessary to estimate the quarterly revenues generated by a storm . water utility. It is our understanding that the Council has discussed rates of $4.95 per residential unit and $49.50 per acre for commercial or industrial properties. A draft ordinance to Chapter 28 of the City Code will be provided at the January 25, 1993 Council meeting, along with two resolutions for review and consideration. The first resolution establishes a City policy for operation of a storm water utility and second resolution establishes the 1993 rates to be levied per quarter. As discussed at the last workshop, the City Council should set a date for a public informational hearing in early March. City staff should also be directed to place an announcement of the hearing date and an informational article in the next City newsletter in mid to late February. It is anticipated that the storm water utility ordinance will be adopted to allow fees to be collected in the second quarter of 1993. D. Ramsev County Roadwav Tumback Issues (520-053-70) A letter dated January 5, 1993 was provided which briefly outlined the consolidation proposal for roadways by Ramsey County. A copy of this letter is attached. We are prepared to discuss this matter at the January 20, 1993 work session. Attachment MEMO..o39.JAN . MG:db . ri'/,ltiIil-:.l. CONSULTING ENGINEERS . Maier Stewart & Associates Inc. January 5, 1993 File: 520-043-70 Ms. Dorothy Person City Administrator City of Arden Hills 1450 West Highway 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112 RE: RAMSEY COUNTY ROADWAY FUNCTIONAL CONSOLIDATION PROPOSAL Dear Ms. Person: As requested, we have recently met with Jim To1aas and Dan Solar of the Ramsey County Public Works Department to further discuss the effects on the City of Arden Hills of the proposed functional consolidation of roadways in Ramsey County. Basically, the proposal calls for the City of Arden Hills to take over 1.19 miles of County roads and 2.61 miles of . County State Aid Highways for a total of 3.80 miles. In turn, the County would take over 1.48 miles of City roads. Therefore, there is a net gain in mileage for the City of 2.32 miles. The following table lists the roadways in Arden Hills involved in the proposed turnbacks: PROPOSED COUNTY ROAD TURNBACKS TO CITY: Lgth Designation RD# Road Name Milepoint Section Termini (M!) Exist Prop 12 Co. Road F .6-1.52 NBt AH-Snelling 0.92 CSAH City 132 Hamline A v 3.56-3.88 Hamline A v- 0.32 County City Ingp.rson Rd 101 Ingerson Rd 0-.49 Hamline Av- 0.49 County City Lexmgton Av 49 Lake Johanna Blvd 0-0.83 Co Rd D-Co Rd E 0.83 CSAH City 76 Snelling A v 0-.86 TH 51-Co Rd E 0.86 CSAH City 163 Stowe Av 0-.25 Cleveland Av- 0.13 County City ~ New Brighton Rd 163 Stowe Av .25-.5 New Brighton Rd 0.25 County City Lk Johanna Blvd - 3.80 Y67/9.3 . C(\:-I:wJ VlhNke) 1959 SLOAN PLACE. SUITE 200. ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55117 612.n4-6021 ~ttl'f :P~y 9600 SHELARD PARKWAY, SUITE 102, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55441 612.546-0432 . EqualOpport ity Employer , . Ms. Dorothy Person January 5, 1993 Page Two PROPOSED CITY ROAD TURNBACKS TO COUNTY: Lgth Designation .!ll2t Road Name MileDoint Section Termini !Mil Exist ~ NR County Road F 1-694 to Lexington 0.44 City IC NR Hamline Ave 1-694 to TH 96 1.04 City IC To enact the entire turnback proposal requires legislative action. It will likely not occur unless the MnDOT Office of State Aid allows the Cities receiving excess mileage to place it on the State Aid system without penalty. This should increase the City's annual allotment thus providing some funding source to maintain the turnbacked sections. In our discussion with Jim Tolaas and Dan Solar, they indicated the County is interested in proceeding with a couple of the turnbacks immediately. They would like County Road F turned back to them and would take Hamline Avenue, a total of 1,48 miles. In exchange, they would like the City to take back Old Snelling Avenue and possibly some other segment. . Along with the turnback, the County is proposing a one-time lump sum payment of approximately $8.00 per square yard. This is about the cost of an overlay. These are several issues we should discuss with the City Council regarding this proposal. We will be available to discuss this with the City Council at their upcoming workshop. Sincerely, MAIER STEWART & ASSOCIATES, INC. ~~ Terry J. /aurer, P.E. TJM:tp 043-0606.jan . . ", . CITY OF ARDEN HILIB MIH:RANOOM TO: Dorothy A. Person, City 1\dministrator FRCK: Dan Winkel, PUblic works SUperint.......ent}VV DATE: February 3, 1993 SUBJECT: OIIerView of 1993 Pawment Manaqement Rating At'o.hAm.1le It appears that by reviewing the 1993 Pavement Management Report compared to the 1990 supplemental report, the City is realizing a more rapid deterioration of its streets than what was thought as recently as two years ago. It is also obvious to me that streets milt within the last 5 to 12 years are not going to realize their projected life span without at least an overlay, recycling, or reconstruction project. All three of these options are much more costly than the routine sealcoat that is generally used to exterxl. a street's life span. I believe that the city will have to monitor street construction and reconstruction IlIUch more closely to ensure proper construction practices. It was reported over and over again during the 1993 survey that a possible lack of = inadequate canparison may have contrib..1ted to the decline of the streets' surfaces. . A small sanple of canparisons between the 1993 and 1990 supplemental study will help to show how quickly same of these streets have deteriorated. '!he following list is based on a point system that used the same criteria for evaluating streets on both occasions. streets with a rating of 0 to 69 are in need of reconstruction. streets rated from 69 to 89 generally will require an overlay, whereas, streets rated from 89 to 94 usually require only a sealcoat. 'Ihe roadways with ratings of 95 to 100 require routine maintenance, such as crack filling and pothole repairs. Another option that is available, and costs between an overlay and a reconstruction project, is recycling. Recycling was done on Dunlap street and West Round Lake Road last year with goo::l. S11ccesS. SI'REEl' 1990 RATING 1993 RATING Keithson Drive 100 78 Amble Drive from Lexington Karth Lake Drive 78 40 Colleen Avenue 99 56 Red Fox Road 91 51 Briarknoll Circle 78 23 Briarknoll Drive 96 35 BuE'~'Ird Court 45 30 Pleasant Drive 93 49 Amble Road from Hamline Avenue to Dead-end 95 43 . ... ; . OVerview of 1993 Pa__t Manaqlllll8llt Rating' Schedule Page 'lWo It should also be noted that although we may plan to do the annual sealcoating an:l. overlaying, sometimes bad fall an:l. spring weather can contriJ::ute to a very rapid decrease in a road's corrlition. A good example of this is what happened to the streets in 1992. West Round Lake Road was rated as a 94 in 1990. However, the roadway deteriorated very quickly in two years an:l. finally the spring thaw an:l. refreezing in 1992 caused large potholes to develop, rendering the road allnost ilrpassable. The pavement management funjs for 1992 had to be used to recycle West Rounj Lake Road, Dunlap street, an:l. also part of the Tiller lane reconstruction. '!herefore, no funjs were available to maintain the annual sealcoat an:l. overlay projects. '!he 1990 street ratings had only 8 sections of roadways scheduled or reconstruction. '!he 1993 study has 54. The same 1990 survey has 35 streets rated for overlays, with 42 rated in that category in 1993. Scheduled sealcoating in 1990 had 19 streets, with 1993 having 30 streets. '!he large in=eases are based on the scores an:l. conunents frem our Public Works staff that did the 1993 survey, an:l. may have been slightly more liberal than in 1991 an:l. 1990. a:lNcrDSION: . It is my opinion that the City will have to identify additional funding sources for future pavement management programs. It is illIportant to realize that we must be as aggressive as funding allows to stay ahead of our declining street conditions. Failure to invest now could start to double an:l. triple repair costs due to recycling an:l. reconstruction projects rather than sealcoat an:l. overlay projects that could be completed now. Perhaps our as="'<;roe!1t policy an:l. part of the County road turnbacks could help with some of the future funding. r1I1/ts Attachments . . . COIPOSITE OITE : 11/11/91 . fR. TREICH SO. FIElD RATIIG C a SETTtE- FT. G S W S U CRICK 0 E SEllEN! H IEII 1 A E U E K I A I C E I W E 1 I R A I I B P 0 A U I I 1 W T 0 f 0 R I R I LI! ITS V I 0 I I S E H R 0 P A U A E STREET I E B T T G T A E E R RAW E S t T H FROI TO S R N H CRACK R R R S I VAtUE I I T E 0 7S 111H ST. IE FROITAIE RD. C UL DE SIC I I I I I 1.8 1.4 1. B 3. B 1. 11.8 1. 1.2 1.1 55 0 99 AtLEY LAKE JOHAIHA 8L FAIRVIEW AVE. I I I I I 3.1 2.8 1.8 3.4 1.1 14.4 1.1 3.1 3. 87 0 34 AIBLE C IR. Ala LE OR. CUL DE SAC I I I I I 3.3.1 3. 3.1 1.4 15./ 1.1 1.1 1.4 it 0 31 AIBLE OR. LEllIGTOI AVe. (ARTH LHE OR. I 6 34 15 611 1.4 1. 3. 3.6 1.4 11.4 1. 1.1 1. 41 R 3! AlBL E RD. - NAILIKE AVE. DEAD EIO I I 14 IS 311 I.B 1. 1. 3. 1.111.4 1.4 1.6 1.6 43 0 16A AROEI OAKS CT. AROEI OHS OR. CUL OE SAC I 1 11 31 I 4. 1. 1. 3. 1. 13. 3. 3.3.4 93 S - 26 ARDEN OHS OR. IIEltIlG AVE. CO. RD. E I 3 34 IS I 4. 1. 2. 3. 1. 13. 3. 3. 3.4 !6 I 19 ARDEN PI. SIElLIIG AVe. HEIIROEI RO. I 6 31 II 3513.43.11.83.1 3.15.61.11.61.6 82 S 16 ARDEN PI. SIEIS CT. SIELLIIG AVe. I 1 11 14 611 1.4 1.4 3.1 1.6 1.1 II.B 1.4 2.6 1. 61 a 61 AROEI VIEW CT. AROEI VIEW OR. CUt DE SAC I I I I 11.4 3. 2.4 3. I 1. 13. 4 1. 1.1 1. it 0 65 AROEI VIEW OR. NAltIlE AVe. 911'e.ROl.HILtS I I I I 5811 3.1 3. 3.3.4 2. 14. 6 2.2.11.4 66 R 61 AROEI VIEW OR. ROIAt HILLS DR. 911 EAST I I I I I 4. 4 3.1.4 4. 3.6 17.4 1.6 3.1 3.1 93 S 63 AROEI VISTA DR. ROIAL HILLS CT. CUL DE SAC I I I I I 4. 4 3. 1.4 4. 3.6 17.4 1.6 3.1 3.1 93 I 13 ASBURY AVe. SO. CITI LIIITS EOIEWATER AVE. I I I I I 1.8 3. 2.8 3.4 1. 14. U 3. 1.2 16 0 II 8ECUAI AVE. IEW BRIGHTOI RD LAKE JDHAIIA BL I I I I 13.4 3. 3. 4. 4. 17.4 1.6 3.8 1.6 89 0 18 BEITOI WAY HARRIET AVe. HARRIET AVe. I 1 35 11 411 1.6 3.4 3.4 4.1 1.4 15. 1. 4 2. 1.2 53 0 54.ARKIOtL CIR. SlEttIll AVe. CUL DE SAC I 3 44 21 I 1. 1. 1. 3.6 1. 7.6 1. 1. 1. 13 0 53 ARKIOLl DR. 10RIA AVE. BRIARUOLL CIR. I 3 31 11 I 1. 1. 1. 3.6 1. 7.6 1. 1. 1. 35 0 92 BRIIHTOI WAY IEW BRIGHTOI RO IEW 8RIGHTON RO I I I I ILl 4. 4.4 4.4 4.6 21.6 1.4 3. 3.6 94 I 94 BRIGHTOI WAI I. BRIGHTOI WAI CU L DE SAC I 3 41 l5 14.1 5. 4. 4. 4 4.4 11. 4. 6 1. 4 3. 8B I 93 BRIGHTOI WAI S. BRIIHTOI WAY CUL DE SAC I 1 15 11 I 4.1 4. 4.4 4.4 4.6 11.61.4 3. 3. 6 89 I 36 BRUEBERR 11M. PAUSHOH OR. OLD HWI. II I I I I I 4.2 4.1 4. 3.1 1.4 lB.4 3.4 4. 4. 99 I 11 BUSIARO CT. SIELLIKI AVE. CUL DE SAC I 5 11 29 3B2B 1. 4 2. 2.2 3.1 I.B 11.6 1.4 1. 1. 31 R 15 C ANIOI AVE. OUILAP ST. TlL LER LI. I 1 II 31 311 1.4 1.8 1.4 3.6 1. 11.1 1.2 1.6 1.1 42 R 11 CARL TOI OR. TILLER LI. TlL LER ll. I I I I 1211 4. 4. 4. 3.6 4.1 19.8 3.4 4. 4. 95 S B9 CHITHAI AVe. SO. CO. RD. El CUL DE SAC I 14 15 34 I 4. 4. 4. 4.4 4.2 11.6 4.B 4. 3.6 95 I 91 CHATHAI CiR. CHATHAI AVe. CU L DE SIC N 3 11 34 I 4. 4. 4. 4.2 4. 11.2 1.6 3.4 3.B B9 0 91 CHATNAl cr. CHATHAI AVE. CU L DE SAC I I I I I 4. 4. 4. 4.4 4.1 11.6 l.B 3.3.4 9S I 560 CO. RD. 0 LEllNGTON AVe. SH ORE L liE I 1 11 14 I 3.1 1.5 1.4 3. I 4. 15. B 3. 1.4 3. B8 0 28 CO. RD. F L EllllTON AVE. NAIL IME AVE. I 3 36 11 I 3. 3.4 3.4 4. 1.5 15.4 1.1 1.8 2.2 58 R 58 CO L LEE! AVE. HAIlIKE AVE. ReC L UKI OR. I 3 33 15 I 2. 1.8 2.B 3.B 1.4 13.B 1. 1.5 1.8 56 R 61 COLlEER CiR. COLlEE! DR. CUL DE SAC I 115 32 I 1. 4 1. 5 2.6 3.5 2. 13.2 1.4 1.4 1.4 55 0 11 CONNELLI AVe. CO.RO. E CO. RD. E I I I I 311 2. 1. 2 3.5 3.6 2. 13.4 1.1 1.6 2. 53 0 85 CRISTAL AVe. FAlRVIEW AVe. CO. RD. f I 331 21 511 4.B 4.B 4.B 4. 5.23.4 5. 5. 5. 92 I 15 CUlKINGS tN. SNELtIN6 AVE. OEAO EIO I I , I , 3. 6 4. 3.1 3.6 4. lB. 4 1. 4 3. 3.6 !4 S 52 DAWN C IR. NORRA AVE. EAST CUL DE SIC I 111 51 111' 5. .4. 4. 4. 3.4 21.4 5. 5. 5. 81 S 51 DAWN CIR. NORRA IVE. WEST CUL DE SAC I I , , 13.6 3.6 3.6 4. 1.6 15.4 3. 3. 3. !I S II OELtVIEW AVE. WEST GRARSIE RO VENUS AVE. I 131 15 I 1. 6 2. 2. 3.6 2. 11.2 1.4 1.6 1.4 IS 0 8' OELLVIEW AVE. SRARSIE RD. CRYSTAL AVe. I I I I 3111 4.8 4.B 4.B 4.1 5. 23.B 5. 5. 5. 81 S 12 OELLWOOO AVE. TILLER l!. 10. OEIO fRO I I I I I 4.4 3.6 3.6 3.6 4.4 11.6 4.6 4.6 L 111 S PAGE 1. . CO!POSlTE 01 IE : 11/11/92 . Fi. TREICH SQ. FIEtO RlTIIi C I SETTlE- FI. 6 S ~ I U CRlCI 0 E HGHNT H HI! l I E U E I I I ! C E I ~ E l I I I I I 8 P 0 I U I I l ~ T 0 F 0 I R R R llllTI V R 0 6 I S E H I 0 P I U ! E STIEET E 8 T T 6 T I E E R II~ E S l T I I FROI TO I I H H CRlCI I I I I I VIlUE I I T E 0 38 DELl~OOD ST. !URSERY HIll CT !18lE RO. I 1 31 11 I 3. 3. 3. 4. 3. 16. 1. 1.6 1.6 GI I 11 OUIlIP IVE. IIGERSOI 10. CIIMOI IVE. I 1 31 11 819. 1.1 1.' 1.1 3.G 3. 11.8 1.. 1.1 1.. 33 R 16 DUIlIP SI. SIEY FOX 10. REO FOX 10. I . . I I I. I. 5. 5. 5. 15. 5. I. I. 11. I 13 EDSE61IEI IVE. LEXlHSTOI IVE. OEIO EIO (E. ~.) I 1 571ft I 3.' 2. 2.1.1 1. 11.8 4.. I. 4. 91 I - II ED6E~IIER lVE. IE~ 81ISHTOI 10 1167'W.IE~ 811. I . I . 311 1. 6 3.1 3.' 3.' 3. 16.6 1.. 1.1.6 7. S 11 E06E~IIER IVE. lS8URY IVE. RIOSE~OOO 10. I I I I I 3.6 '.3.1 4. 4. 19. I. I. .. 111 I - 16 E06E~!TER lYE. 11.7'~.IE~ 8RI. CUl DE SIC I I I I I I. 1.2 1.1 ... I. 21.81.8 3.6 3.1 9t S It ErOE C II. H!lllIE !VE. CUL DE IIC I I I I II' 1.1 3. 1.1 3.1 1.1 11.8 1. 1. 1. .. I II FIlIVlE~ IVE. ILLEY 6RII! RO. I I I I I 3.1 3.1 3.2 3.6 3.2 16.1 3. 1. 8 99 0 '83 FIIIVIE~ lYE. VEIUI lYE. 6RUSlE RO. I I I . 11.6 2.1.13.8 2. 12.81.1 1.1 1.1 61 0 '78 FIIIVlE~ IVE. CO. RD. F ~EST 6RlISlE 10 I 129 II I 1.1 2.8 2.' 3. 1.1 11. 1. 1. 1. 18 R 19 FERI~OOO lVE. CO. 10. F 1981' 10RTH I 1 52 15 I 1. 6 2. 2. 3. 1.1 9.8 1. 1.. 1.. .8 R ,17 FERI~OOO CI. IIGERSOI RO. CUl DE SIC I 112 9 111 I., 3.S 3.6 3.6 1.6 19.8 1.1 1.1 1.1 86 S '13 FEII~OOO ST. ClltTOI ORIVE O.E. SOUTH. I I I I I .. I. 4. 3.6 1.2 19.8 1.6 1.6 1.6 92 S -IS FlORIl OR. HUllH lVE. ~EST TO OElOEIO I 3 34 II I 1.1 I., 1.1 4. S. 22.1 S. 4.1 I., 91 S 33 FOREST ll. HEMlROEI 10. SIELlllS lVE. I 2 16 21 I 3. 3.2 1.1 3.1 3.8 16.6 3. 3.3.2 92 I ill.RTlGE RD. S7S' I. OF 6REY F RED FOX RD. 1 11 21 12.1 1. 3. 3.6 2.' 11.. 1. 2. 1. 6S 0 I1J IU6E RD. 6REY FOI RD. 171' 10RTH I I . I I. 3.2 3. 3.6 1.1 16./ 1.8 1.1.' 77 0 174 FROITl6E RO.3IW 11TH ST. 13TH ST. 136 11 I 1. 8 3. 3.3.' 2.8 15. 3. 3.3.8 93 I 173 FROIT!SE RO.35W HISH~IY 96 IHH ST. I . I I S. 5. S. 5. 5. 2S. 5. I. I. 11. I .28 FIOITISE(SIElt) lRDEI PL. OEID EIO I I I 611 2.8 2.1 1.1 3.1 2.1 13.' 1. 6 2.1 2.1 6. R In Sll E CII. ~EIT FlORll OR. CUl DE SIC . I I . 1.1 3. 1.1 3.6 1.6 12. 1.2 1.1 1.. .. 0 ,31 HEIIIDEI CT. SIELlIIG lYE. SXllES ll. 1 16 11 211 3.1 3.8 3.6 4. 4. 18.8 2.1 3. 1.2 89 5 .31 SlEIRROEI RD. AROEI PL. 6LEIIRDEI C I. I I I 611 3.6 3.6 3.61.2 .. 19.3,' 3.' I. 91 I ,12 HEIHlll 10. HISH~AY II IS8URY AVE. I I I 13.13.83.' 3.6 3.8 18. 2.' 2.' 3. 8 88 S ..5 6 LEIPlUl lVE. ClEVEl!ID lVE. IE~ 81I6HTOI 10 I I I 311 3.1 3. 3.1 4. 3.817.1 1.2 3. 2. 79 R 186 HEMVIEW!VE. FIlRVlEW IVE. C RYSTIl !VE. 131 21 311 1.1 1.1 1. 3.6 1. 11.21.1 1.1 1.1 12 0 187 5LEIVlEW CT. 6lEIVlEW lYE. CUl DE SIC 3 41 15 12.12.' 2.6 4. I. 15.1 3.' 3.1 3. 88 0 179 6R RIllE RD. DEllVIE~ AVE. RD llll6 HIl tS I I I I I 1. 3. 2.8 3.8 1. 13.61.' 1.. 1.1 18 0 .11 GRINT RD. FIIRVlE~ lYE. NE~ 8R I iHTDI RD I I I 11.8 3. 2.8 3.1 2.2 11.2 1.1 2.8 2.6 81 0 112 6REY FOX RD. lElllSTOI !YE. FROlTASE RD. Y I I I I 1.1 3.6 2.83.' 2.2 15.1 1.8 1. 2.! 71 0 III HIIlIlE AVE. Il6E ISOI 10. TItlEl LA. I I I I I 1.1 2.2 2.2 3.6 l.4 12.8 1.2 1.. 1.1 58 R :34 MIlllNE IVE. FL ORIL OR. T. H. 96 I I I I I 1.1 2.2 2.' 2.6 1.8 11.1 3. 3. 3. 97 I 119 HIRRlET IVE. LEll16TOI lYE. PINE TREE OR. I 2 38 II I 1.. 1.2 1.81.1 2. 11.8 1.1 1.1 1.1 II 0 116 HUHTERS CT. BfHTOI i! Y CUl DE SIC N 11 I I I 1.8 2. 2.2 3.1 2. 11.1 1.2 1.2 1.4 52 0 141 IIOIAI OAXS CIR HIllINE IVE. CUl DE SIC I I I I I 1.' 2.8 2. 8 1. 3.1 15.1 1. 3. 1. 98 I 157 110111 OAXS CT. JAIES IVE. CUL DE IIC Y 126 21 611 1.1 I. L 3.6 I. 21. 2.1 1.' 1.' 81 I 151 II0I!N DAIS TR. HlllI!E AVE. WEST TO CDS I \ II 11 I I.. 1.6 I. 3.6 I. 21. 8 1. I. .. l6 I 19/ !ROlli pt. CO. RD. E CUl DE SAC I I I I , 3.4 3.. 3.8 .. 4. 18.8 1.1 3. 1. 1I 0 118 IH6ERSOI CT. !RSEISOI RD. DEAD EIO I I I I 111 3.2 2.. 2.1 3.6 3.6 1\.2 1.8 3.6 I. 93 S PHE 2. . CORPOSIIE OITE :ll/22/l2 . Fa. TREICH SQ. FIElO aITIR6 C A SETHE- F!. 6 S W S U CRACl O' E SE6IENT H lENT l A E U E I I A I C E I W E l I A A I I a P 0 A U I I t W T 0 F 0 a I A I lIIITS V I 0 6 I S E H A 0 P A U A E STREET I E a I T 6 T A E E A AAW E S t T I FAOI TO S A K K CAAC! A A A S I YAlUE I I T E 0 56A JAIES AVE. COl LEEI AVE. 137' SOUTK I I 2.6 3. 3.3.8 2. ILl 1.1 1.6 2. 63 0 56 JAIES AYE. IIDIAN OAlS IA. 188' NOAIK I I 1.1 3. 3. 3.6 2.1 13.1 I. I. 1. 5l 0 18 JIlES CIR. WEST FlOAAl DA. CUl OE SAC I I 1.6 2.4 2.1 3.81.2 11.1 I. 1. 1. 18 0 .. JAlIE CIRCLE UTE tARE I.E. I I 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 LI 19.6 L L 2 1.2 lit I 77 JANEl CT. CO. RD. F CUl OE SAC I I L 3.2 3. 3.6 L 11.8 2.1 3.3.2 1I S - Il JERROtD AYE. IIII'W.IEW aAI. CUt DE SAC I I 3.6 3.1 3.1 3.6 3.1 11.1 I. 2.1 3. 81 0 - 18 JERROLD AYE. NEW 8RI6KTON RO 1111'W.NEW 8RI. I I 3.6 3.1 3.2 2.6 1.6 11.1 2.6 2.1 3. 11 0 35 lARIK LAlE CIR. KAllllE AYE. 2NO CUl DE SAC I I 2. 3.3.2 L 2. IL 2 I. 1.6 1.6 5l 0 31 URTK lHE DR. PLEASANT OR. CUl OE SAC I I 1.1 2. 3. 3.1 1.1 11.2 1. 1.4 1.2 Il a 13 lATE LI. ClEVElAID AVE. DEAO EID I I L2 3.3.1 L L2 18.8 2.1 2.2 3.1 88 S 61 (f IIKSON DA. HI6HWAI H DEAO END (SO.) I I 2. 2. 2. 2.6 2.8 11.4 2.6 2.6 2.6 18 0 l8 lHE LI. lAlE JOKAHIA aL OEAO EIO WEST I I 3.1 I. 3.6 1.2 L 1l.2 3. 3. 3.2 lit I 13A tHE ll. E06EWATEA AYE. OEAO ENO (NO.) 2 IS 5 1.1 2. 2. 3. 2. 11.4 I. 6 2. 2. 52 0 6l lAlE SHORE PL. KI6KWAY l6 HI6KWAI II I I I I. 6 I. a 2.3.8 2. 11.2 1.1 1.1 1.6 52 A 21 LAIETlI CIR. lAIETH LI. CUl DE SAC I I I I 1.6 2. 2. 2. 2.12.6 2. 2. 2. 71 0 II lAIEIT! ll. SNE l lIN6 AYE. CUl DE SAC I I I I. I. I. L 1.2 II. 2 2. 2. 2. 62 A 5l_lUMS OR. CO L lEEI AYE. SIElLIR6 AYE. I I I 1.1 1.1 I. 3.6 1.1 8.8 I. I. I. 38 R 88 RAClEI tl. OLD HUHWAY 11 CUl DE SAC I 31 IS 3.2 3.3.13.83.6 ll. 3. 3. 3. 96 R 12 OilE RD. IEW 8RI6HTON RO FAIRYIEW AYE. I I I 21t L 2 1.2 L 1.2 1.2 21.8 3. 3.3.8 l5 S 51 NORlA AYE. aRIARlNOlt OR. III' SOUTH I I I I 2. 2.6 2. 6 3. a I. 8 12.8 2. 2. 2. 56 0 51 10RlA AYE. aRIAAUOLl OR. COllEEN AYE. I I I III 3. 3. 3. 3. 8 3. 15.8 2.6 2.6 2.6 Il 0 51R NORlA AYE. CUl-OE-SAC 152' 10RlK I I I 2. 2.6 2.6 3.8 1.8 12.8 1.6 2. 2. 52 R '16 NORlA C IR. WESI FLORAL OR. CUl DE SAC I I I 1.2 3. 3. 3.a 1.1 12.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 51 0 21 NORUWOOOS OR. REO FOI AO. OEAO END I I I 1.3.8 3.3.8 2. 16. 6 2.1 2.4 3.2 81 S '31 IURSERY Hill CT IURSERY Kill LI CUl DE SAC 1 31 2l 2. 6 3.1 3.1 I. 2. 15.1 2.2 2.1 2.1 13 0 '36A NURSeRY HILL II NURSERY Hill CI 3l3' 10RIH I I I 2.6 3.1 3.1 L 2. 15.1 2.2 2.1 2.1 13 0 '36 IURSERY HilL II HAIL lIE AVE. 791' EAST 6 16 15 2.6 3.1 3.1 I. 2. 15.4 2.22.6 2.6 81 0 13 OAK AVE. LAlE JOHAINA IL CUl OE SAC 526 15 3. 2.2 2.1 2.8 2. 12.1 1.2 2.6 2.1 11 R 35 P!AlSHORE OR, OLD HWI. II CUL-OE-SAC I I I 1.1 3. 3. 3.6 LI 18.1 5. 5. 5. lit N 27 P RSCAl AYE. CO. AD. E OEAO fRO I I I 3.1 3. 2.6 3.1 2. ILl 1.6 2.8 2.2 81 R 21 PINE TREE OR. HARR! E I AVE. CO. RO. E 1 15 18 L6 3.6 3.6 1.2 3. 19. 2. 2. 2. 11 S 33 PLEASAMI ClR. lEXUITOI AVE. CU l DE SAC I I I 1. 2. 8 2.6 3.' 3. IL 8 3. 3. 3. 12 S 32 PLEASANT OR. URTH LAKE OR. Ill'S. Of PLEAS. I I I I 1.1 2. 3. 3.6 1.1 11.1 I. 1.1 1.2 19 0 J1A PLEASANI OR. Alile OR, 111'S.Of PLEAS. I I I I I 1.6 2.2 2.1 3.6 1.811.6 1.2 1.2 1.2 52 0 17 PR I OR AVE. CO. RD. 0 OeAO EIO IORTH I I I I Hll.6 3. 3.2 3.' 3.1 15.6 I. 6 3.2.6 78 0 25 REO fOX RD. fRONT A6E RD. lElIliTON AVE. N I 12 11 512.12.1 3. 3.6 I. 6 13. I. I. 2 1..4 51 S 18 RI06EWOOO CT. R I06EWOOD RD. CU t DE SAC I I I I III 2.6 2. a 3. 3.' 3. 2 15. 2.1 2. 6 2.2 75 0 51 RID6EWODO RO. SO. CITY LIIITS OEAO EID N 1 31 21 I L 3.8 3.2 3.4 I. 18.1 3. 3. 3.2 lit I 15 RI06EWOOO RO. LAlE JOHRNIA 8L AROEI Pl. I I I I 2315 I. 3.' 3.1 I. 3.8 t8.6 2.8 1.4 3.2 8! 0 '82 ROllI!6 HIltS R VEIUS AVE. 6RABIE RO. I 1 31 15 I I. 6 3. 3.3.8 2. 13.1 I. 1.2 1.2 56 0 PABE 3. . . . . COMPOSITE DATE :11/11/92 . F!. TRE!CH 5q. FIEtO RATU6 C R SETTLE- F!. ; 5 W 5 U CRICK 0 E 5E;1E1T H !EIT L I E U E K ! I ! C E ! W E L ! R I I I 8 P 0 I U I ! L W T 0 F 0 R ! R ! LI! IT 5 V ! 0 ; I 5 E H R 0 P I U I E STREET I E 8 T T ; T I E E R RIW E S L T ! FRO! TO 5 I H H ClACK R R R 5 ! VIlUE ! ! T E 0 6l ROYIL HILL5 OR. 5!ELLI!; IVE. 1I0E! VIEW OR. ! I I I 14.4 3. 1.1 4. 3.; 11.1 1.; 3.1 3.1 93 5 43 ROYIl L!. WE51 FLORIL L!. !OR!I IVE. ~ 3 31 11 I 3.6 3.6 3.1 3.8 1.1 16.8 1.1 3. 3. 9' 5 11 SIIDEEI RD. LIKE JOHII!I 8L LIIE JOHI!!I 8L ! , I , , 3.6 3.6 3.4 3.1 2.8 16.8 1.8 3. 3. 93 5 681 SERVICE C05 1l0l; 5.T.H. 11 ! I I I 311 I. 3.2 3. 3.8 I. 18. 2. 6 3. 3. 94 5 68 SERVICE RO.8.11 ILO!; S.T.H. 11 ! , , I I I. 3.2 3. 3.8 I. 18. 2.; 3. 3. 91 5 - 32 SHOREtUE L!. CO. 10. 0 DEAD E!O ! I I I 11 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.8 11.1 3. 3.6 2.8 94 S - Ii SHOREtUE LN. E06EWITER IVE. OEIO E!O (SO.) ! , I , I 2. 2.1 2. 3.13.1 13.2 1.1 1.6 1.1 sa 0 12 SHOREWOOO DR. CUL DE SAC LAlE JOHIUI 01 ! I I I I 3. 3.6 3.8 3.8 2.2 16.1 1.6 2.8 3.2 82 0 11 S IE!S C1. LIKE JOHI!!I 8L CUL DE SIC I , , , , I. 1.2 I. 1.1 4.2 21.6 2.; 3. 3.8 94 S 11 SKILES L!. EIST S!EllI!; IVE. ;LE!IIOEI 10. ! , , , , 3.6 3. 3.1 3.1 3. 1;.2 2.4 3. 2.6 93 S 32 SllLE5 ll. WE5T 5~EllI!; IVE. OElD EIO ! , , , , 3. 3. 2.83.61.8 11.2 2. 2.6 3. 2 81 0 64 S!ELLU; IVE. 8RIIRI!OlL CIR. HI;HWIY 96 Y I I I 5111 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 25. 5. 5. 85 S 95 THO I OR. ClEVEtANO IVE. IEW 8RI!HTOI RO ! 1 \I 11 I 1.1 3.4 3.1 3.4 2.1 15. 1.1 3. 2 1.6 82 0 11 TILLER L!. HI!tUE IVE. LEll!!IOI IVE. " , , , 5. 5. 5.3.6 5. 23.6 6. 5. 5. III " 11 VHEITI!E IVE. OLD H16HWAY 11 CO. RD. F ! I , I .11 I. 3. 3. 3. 8 S. 18.8 1.1 I. 4. 95 " 12 VILE!TI"E CR.RO VILE!TIIE IVE. CUL DE SIC " 311 28 311 1.4 3.1 3.4 3.8 1.1 19.2 I. I. 4.1 91 S 11~LEITIIE CT. VHEITIIE IVE. CUl OE SIC I , , , I 3. 3. 1. 3.8 2.1 11. 1.4 1.4 1.1 61 0 31 IUS IVE. OELLVIEW IVE. ROlLU! HIlL5 R " I 31 IS I 1.. 2.1 2.2 3.6 2. 11.81.6 1.1 1. 54 0 11 HOOI Pl. BEITOI WAY CUL DE 51C I I I I I 2.2 3. 3.1 3.8 4. 16.2 1.1 2. 2.1 68 0 37 UE06EWOOO CII. OLD HWY. 11 CUL-OE-SIC,WEST I , , , , 4. I. 3. 3.8 I. 18.83.4 3.8 3.8 111 I 411 UYICREST CI. 131'W.OF HI!LII CUL-OE-SIC " 3 15 31 , 1.1 3. 2.8 3.6 1.& 11.1 I. 1. 1. 59 0 II UYlCREST CI. HA!tUE AVE. 131' WESI I I , , , 2.1 3. 3.3.8 3. 15. 1. 1.1 1.2 .3 0 '41 WYMCRESI LI. WYMCREST CT. WYlRI06E OR. I I I I , 2.6 3. 3. I. 3.1 15.8 S. I. 1. 11 0 12 UYMRlO6E OR. WYRCREST CT. CUl OE SAC I I I , I 3. 3.1 3.1 4. 3. 16.6 I. 1. 1. 64 R PilE I. . , SUBJECT . t,WI.;,1 d -.- PROJECT * Maier Stewart & Associates Inc. CLIENT PROJ. NO. DATE /..../z.z/"z... , / BY CHKD PAGE OF --- 5ElECT 5HEET:10 5EIlEIT 5:FROI S:TO SCORE FROI pod.t. ORDER BY SCOIE WHERE. RECOIN EO S 5HEET:10 5EIlENT 5:FROI 5:TO SCORE -------. --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------- 115 REO FDl RD. FROITI6E RD. lElIN6TON IVE. 51 - 111 PUE TREE Oi. HIRRlET IVE. CD. RD. E 14 - 115 E06EWATER IVE. NEW 8RI6HTON RD 1161'W.NEW 8RI. 11 181 DEllVIEW IV1. SRAN51E 10. CRYSTAl IV1. 81 157 110111 0115 CT. JINE5 IVE. CUl DE SIC 81 151 OIWI ClR. IDRNA IV1. EIST CUl DE SIC 81 129 IROEN PI. 5MELllII IVE. 6lENAROEI 10. 82 1S4 5NEll US IV1. BIIIRINOll CII. HIIHWAY 96 85 II/ FEINUOOO CT. lN6ER501 RD. CUL DE 51C 8S 1/7 IORTHUOODS OR. RED FOl RO. OEIO END 81 121 SlEHKIll RD. N l& HWll 51 H8URY IV1. 88 113 lATE ll. CLEVElUD AVE. DEID EMD 88 131 SlENAIOEN CT. 5lElllN& IV1. HILES lH. 8l 1/6 14TH Sf. ME FRONTIIE RD.35W 132' EI5T 89 . 151 OAUI Cli. NORMA IV1. UEST CUl OE SAC 91 ~ 10 lOYAL ll. WE5T FlORIl LN. 10R~A IVE. 91 1/1 VIlENTINE CR.RO VALENTINE AVE. CUl OE 51C 91 185 CRYSTAL IVE. FIIRVlEU IV!. CO. RD. F 92 i33 FOREST ll. HENIROEN 10. 5NELllN& IVE. 91 133 PlEHIMT CIi. lElll6TOI IVE. CUl DE 51C 92 113 FERMUOOD ST. CARL TOI DRIVE D. E. SOUTH. 91 111 51NOEEN RD. lllE JOHINIA 8L lllE JONIINI 8l 93 161 ARDEN VIEW DR. ROYIl HILl5 OR. 921 EA5T 93 118 IN6ER50H CT. lNIER50N 10. OE!O ENO 93 iiI ROYAL HILL5 OR. 51EllINI IVE. AROEN VlEU OR. 93 117 5KILE5 LI. EAST 5NELlIN& AVE. GlENAROEN RD. 93 163 ARDEN VI5TA OR. ROYAL HIlL5 CT. CUL OE 5AC 93 174 FROHTAIE RO.35W 14TH 5T. 13TH 5T. 93 116A ARDEN OAKS CT. AROEK OAK5 DR. CUL DE SAC 93 115 CUNN III S LN. 5KEL L IN, AVE. DEAD EIO 91 li8A SERVICE C05 HON& S.T.K. 11 94 168 SERVICE RD.8.11 ALOII 5.T.K. 11 91 192 8RIIKTON WAY NEW 8RIIKTOI RD NEU BRIGHTON RO 91 177 JINE! CT. CO. RD. F CUl OE 5AC 94 331 5HORE L lNE LI. CO. RO. 0 DEIDENO 94 116 ED6EUATER IV1. IIS7'U.NEU BRI. CUL DE 51C 91 114 SlEN5 CT. liKE JOHANNI Bl CUl DE 5AC 94 111 N~BLE 10. NEW 8RI&HTON RD FIliVIEW IVE. 95 111 CARl TON OR. T!LLER IN. TILLER IN. 95 . 113 EOiE5ATER IV1. LEIUSlOI AVE. DE AD EIO (1. U.) 91 145 FLORAl 01. HULllE AVE. UEST TO OElDEIO 97 111 DEL lUOOD 4VE. T!L LO lH. NO. DEAD END 111 Press ani key to cJntinue c;... "f~<:?r.:;""" .f~~.4~ c: ~ r--' "p4J S'r~C::- -- ---~- -- -".----- . iI~ ~."'" """.. "..,., ",.., ",. ".., "0' ....,. '0'" ., ".., ""'" · ~ · .:::;;,:: ;""""""" ""0'"""", """"""", ""'"", " ,1,~ 15\ SRIARllDll ClR. 51ELllN6 IVE. CUl DE SIC 23 . 2- 153 BRIARllOllDI. 10RAI AVE. BRIARllOll ClR. 35 GE_ OF_ 139 AISLE RD. H!IlIlE IVE. DUD EID 43 141 IAlE C lR. WEST FlORIl OR. CUl OE SIC H 118 JilES ClR. ~E5T FlORIl OR. CUl DE SIC 48 132 PlEASIIT DR. llRTH lIlE OR. 131'5.0F PLEAS. 43 119 HAiRIET IVE. lElllSTOI IVE. PINE TlEE OR. 51 1\6 NOIN! C lR. WE5T FlORIl OR. CUL DE SIC 51 113A lHlE ll. EOSEWITER IVE. OEAD ENO (10.) 51 116 HURTERS C1. 8EIT01 WRY CUl DE SAC 51 - 186 SlENVlE~ IV1. FAlRVlEW lYE. CRY5TAL IV1. 52 1311 PlEISIIT OR. liSLE 01. 131' 5. OF PlEIS. 52 - 118 BE IT OR WAY MARRIET IVE. HUllEr lYE. 53 121 COlWEll Y AVE. CO.RD. E CO. RO. E 13 181 VEIU5 IV1. OEllVlE~ IVE. ROllll6 8lLl5 R 54 : , 1St DELlVlEW IV1. WEST SRIISIE 80 VENUS IVE. 55 I 115 IlTH ST. IE FROITISE RD. CUl DE SAC 55 i 151 RORA! IVE. 8RIARlNOll DR. H4' 58UTH , 5i I 182 ROllIIS HIllS R VEIU5 IVE. SRII5lE RO. 5i ~ IiI COlLEEI ClR. COLlEEN DR. CUl DE SAC 5. 119 lRAN5IE RD. DEllVIEW IV1. ROllllS Mlll5 R 58 116 SHORElllE ll. EOSEWITER IVE. DEIDE!D{50.) 58 . 15i JIIE5 IVE. INDIAI OilS TR. 188' 10RTH 59 lit! ~YlCREST C1. 234'W.OF MIRlIN CUl-DE-SIC 59 ~ 135 KARTH lAKE CIR. H!lllIE IVE. 210 CUl OE 51C 59 ~ 134 Il8lE ClR. AUlE OR. CUl DE SAC .1 tiS AlOEN VlE~ CT. 1I0EN VlEW DR. CUl OE 5HC 61 c:J IS3 FAlRVlEW IV1. VENUS IVE. 6RAR5lE RD. 61 111 VAlEITlIE CT. VAlEITIlE IVE. CUl DE SIC 62 tll WYNCREST C1. HllllNE IVE. 231' WEST .3 15SA JIlE5 IVE. COLLEEN IVE. 131' SOUTM .3 114 FROIT!SE RD. 575'R.OF IREY FRED FOl RD. is 111 ~AlOOI Pl. BElTOI WIY CUl DE 5HC 68 121 lIlETTI C IR. lllETTI IN. CUl OE 5AC 11 122 lREY FOl RO. lElUIION AVE. FROIUSE RD. 11 131 IUR5EIY HILL CT RUR5ERY HILL II CUl DE 5!C 13 13SA IURSERY HIll II NUR5ERY HILL CT 393' 10RTH 13 III ~YNCREST Ll. WYICRE5T CT. WYNllOSE OR. 71 118 IIOSEWOOO CT. R IDSEWOOO RO. CUl DE 5HC 15 123 AS8URY IV" 50. CITY llllT5 EOIEWITER IVE. 7. 123 FRONUSE RD. IRE Y FOX RD. 575' NORTM 11 118 JERROLD IV1. IE~ 8RI18TOI RD 1111'W.IEW 8RI. 11 til HITMSOIOR. M16M~A! 9S OEAO EID (SO.) 7S 117 PRIOI IVE. CO. RO. 0 DEID ENO 10RTH IB 151 NORN! IVE. SRIARlNOLlOR. COLLEEI IV1. 19 132 SlllES IN. WEST 5NELLIIS AVE. OEID EID St 13& IURSERY HIll II Mill liE IVE. 191' EAST 8t . III SRAIT RO. FAlRVlEW IVE. lEW BRlSHTOI RD St 112 5HOREWOOO OR. CU L 01 5AC lHlE JOHIIWI OR S2 135 THOI OR. CLEVE lIlD AVE. NE~ 8RIIHTOH RO 82 119 J ERROLO IV" 1111'~.IEW BRI. CUL OE 5!C 84 199 AlLEY LIKE JOMIlll 8L FAIRVIE~ AVE. 87 6S6S CO. RO. 0 LElUITOI IVE. 5MOREllIE 8S 1S7 SlENVIEW C!. GlE!VIEW AVE. CU l DE 51C 88 ~i/E-R ') ~ ._~ -..---- ---------------- ---- --- . Dvev{cut{ ~Or:.+) 191 CHATHA! ClI. CHATHII IV!. CUl DE 5AC 89 111 8ECUIl IVE. MEW 8RI6HTON RO lllE JOHANII Bl 89 115 RI06EWOOD RD. lllE JOMAMMA 8l IROEI Pl. 89 197 lMOlAl Pl. CO. RO. E CUl OE SIC 91 III FlIRVlE~ IVE. AlLEY SlANT IlD. 99 - / - ~77_:..q ~~ ;m/.4~ ,,'" &"'"""""" kl ~ /&V Aryef'- . \ . t,WI.;,1 d -- SUBJECT . PROJECT * Maier Stewart & Associates Inc. CLIENT PROJ. NO. DATE /.... hzhz...- BY CHKD ' / PAGE OF SELECT SHEET:NO SE6!EIT S:FRO! 5:TO SCORE FROI pod.t. OROER 8Y SCORE WHERE + RECOIl EO R 5HEET:10 5E6!EIT 5:FRO! 5: TO SCORE -------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------- l21 8U5SIRD CT. 51ElLl!6 AVE. CUL DE SIC 31 114 OUNllP IV!. l!SERSO! RO. CillO! IV!. 33 159 IcC lUNS DR. COlUEI IVE. SlEllINS IVE. 38 - 131 AI8LE OR. Ulll6TON IVE. (IRTH LHE DR. II - 115 CUION IVE. DUIlAP ST. TILLER lR. 42 III ElDE ClR. HUlllE AVE. CUL DE SIC 44 129 FEiI~DOO IVE. CO. RO. F 19B5' RORTH 48 118 FAlRVlEW IVE. CO. RO. F WEST SRU5lE RO 48 131 lARTH lllE DR. PUISIRT OR. CUl OE SAC 49 ISlA 10R!I IVE. CUl-OE-51C 151' !ORTH 52 1i9 LUE SHORE Pl. HI6HWAY 9S HlSHWAY 11 51 158 CD LlEER IVE. HUlllE IVE. !cClUNS OR. 56 119 HULlNE AVE. USERS OR RD. TILLER l!. 58 ~' 128 CO. RD. F LEll!6TO! IVE. HULlNE IVE. 58 . 11. IRDEI Pl. SIE!S CT. SNElll!6 IVE. 61 ~ 138 OElLWOOD 5T. NUR5ERY HILL CT II8LE RD. 61 119 LUETTI LR. 5RElLUI IVE. CUL DE SIC 61 111 WYIRIOSE OR. WnCREST CT. CUL DE 5AC S4 ~ 128 FROITISE(SIELL) AROEI Pl. ---.-- OE!O ERD S4 ~ liS IRDE! VlEW DR. HAlllNE IVE. 921'E.ROY.HllL5 66 113 OU IVE. LIRE JOHAIIA BL CUl DE 51C 11 115 6lENPAUL IVE. CLEVElAND IVE. NEW BRlSHTOI RD 19 121 PASCAl IVE. CO. 10. E DEIO END 81 188 IcCRAC(f! LN. OLD HlSHWAY 11 CUl DE 5AC 9S Pre" enJ key to continue ~~ / L5~ ak- 4bt..eJ ,4 ~ 4- ~W A'l'2f~ - .-.- .- -- . SUBJECT . t,WI.;,1 d --,-- PROJECT * Maier Stewart & Assodates Inc. CLIENT PROJ. NO. DATE /.;/zy,.z.... BY CHKD PAGE OF: 5ELECT 5HEET:NO SESIEIT S:FROI S:TO SCORE fROI podat. OROER 8Y SCOIE WHERE. mOll E~ I 5HEET:I SESIEHT 5: fRO! S:TO 5COIE -------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------- 114 Bil6HTOl WAY I. Bil6HTON WI! CUl DE SIC 88 - 113 8RI6HTOH WIY 5. 8RISHTON WIY CUt OE SAC 83 - 189 C HITH U IVE. SO. CO. RO. El CUl DE SIC IS 131 SlEHAlDEI RD. AlDEI Pl. SlENIROEI C1. 95 111 VAlElTIIE IVE. OlO HISH~AY 11 CO. 10. f 95 155 110111 OIKS TR. HINlIIE IVE. ~E 51 TO COS 96 126 AlOEI OAK5 OR. 5HEllUS IVE. CO. 10. E 96 t31 HUlUE IVE. flORAl OR. 1. H. 96 91 113 IHDIII OAl5 CIR HIllIIE IVE. CUl OE 5AC 98 ,~ III CHATHA! C1. CHATHAR IVE. CUl DE SIC 99 136 81UE8ERRY ll. PARK5HOIE DR. OLD HWT. 11 99 113 fROITASE RD.35W HISHWIY 96 11TH S1. III 12S OUNlAP ST. 6REY FOl RO. RED FOl RO. III ~ . 151 RlO6EWOOD RO. 50. CITY LIIITS OEAD END III t24 EDSEWITEI IVE. IS8URY IVE. RlD6EWOOD 10. III 114 JARlE CIRCLE KATE lARE 1.1. III III TlL LER ll. HUlUE IVE. lElllSTO! IVE. III 135 PARISH ORE OR. OLD HWT. 11 CUl-DE-51C III -------- --------------- -- . - --- -- -~_. ---------- 118 LAlE LI. LIIE JOHIIN! 8L DEID END WEST III t31 WE06EWOOO ClR. OLD HWT. 11 CUl-OE-SAC,WEST III Press any k.y to ,ontinue .... R~~~~ .bA.';~./'-""'.A'~ .*' ~-6 ~,..&'kJ .sr2f~ . -...- FE~B...",.. ~3-93 ~.J E ~I ::=: : ::: "::::' r'1A I ER STE<-'ART :;;, ASSI::'C .. P. o2t 1 " . , '-' ... ' "... , , . CONSULTING ENGINEERS - Maier Stewart & Associates Inc. January 15, 1990 File No: 520-007-70 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Arden Hills City Hall 1450 W. Highway 96 Arden Hills, loiN 55112 RE: PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT UPDATE Dear Council Members: . As directed, we have prepared an update to the City's Pavement Management Study of March 1988. This update is not intended to replace the original study but, instead, be a supplement to it. Attached to this report are two revised computer printouts. The first, labeled Exhibit 1, is a complete printout of the rating of all City streets. This rating reflects the reconstruction, overlays and seal coating accomplished during 1988 and 1989. Since the original street ratings are only two years old, an entire re-rating of the streets is not justified at this time. However, a cursory review of the original ratings was completed. An entire re-rating should be considered approximately every four years, The second computer printout attached. labeled Exhibit 2, is an alphabetical listing of all City streets grouped according to recommended improvement. . This listing also includes an estimated project cost for the recommended improvement. The costs have been revised to reflect current project costs. 1959 SLOAN PLACS, $T. PAUL. MINNESOTA 55117 612.77406021 Equal Oppo~unlty Employe, FEB- '::;-93 WED 8:3121 MAIER STEWAFi:T :;r" ASSCIC _ P.02 , V V . . . ~rTY OF ARDEN HILLS JANUARY IS, 1990 PAGE TWO The primary function of this update is to help the City plan street improvement programs to stay ahead of major street problems throughout the City. By using the Pavement Management System, tough decisions can be made with regard to choosing street improvement programs that yield the best results for the City. It is imperative that the City maintain and improve existing streets at a faster rate than the streets are declining. If improvements are not made at a faster rate, reconstruction costs will escalate to the point where it will be impossible to fund all of the . necessary work. As evidenced by the Pavement Management Study (hereafter referred to as the Studyl, a number of streets need seal coating or overlay. The City must strive to make the necessary improvements to keep these streets from further decline and ultimately needing reconstruction. The Study is an on-going data base that provides the City a tremendous tool to compare various streets and systematically set up yearly street improvements programs based on tangible evidence. This evidence is the rating figures for each particular street. The Study takes a wide variety of street criteria, such as age, type and severity of problem areas and existing pavement thickness to give each street d single rating on a scale of 1 to 100, Following is a breakdown of the rating ranges and the action which is suggested by the rating on each particular street. . FEB- 3-";'3 "J E D 8 : :::; 1 t1AIER STEWART & ASSOC. P..03 : ~i -....I . CITY OF ARDEN HILLS JANUARY 15, 1990 PAGE THREE A. 100-95 No Work Required Other Than Normal Maintenance Streets with a rating in this group are in very good shape, They have few. if any, prOblem areas. Normal maintenance should be perfcrmed as needed, with cr=cks being properly filled and any isolated b~d spots repaired immediately to keep the problems small, 8. 90-94 Seal Coating Required These streets are also rated as being in very good shape. There is really no perceptible difference between these streets and streets . rated between 95-100, All streets above 95 will eventually need seal coating. This break at 94 is merely an indicator to help pricriti~e the order of streets to be seal coated. A street seal coated within the last 3 years is given a slightly higher rating than a street needing seal coating next year, The difference between a street ratea a 97 and a street rated at 92 is relatively minor, C. 69-89 Overlay Required It is in this category that greater differences between streets are perceived. All streets in this category are streets that are worth the investment to save. However, the condition of a street near the upper end of this range is in far better Shape than those near the lower end. It is with1n this range that the prioritization of which streets are . included in each year's street program will be very important. The longer that a street i~ allowed to deteriorate within this category. FEB- 3-::-::: "'JED ::=:32 r'1A I ER STEi.....ART a:. ASSOC.. P_04 '/ V ; V . CITY OF ARDEN HILLS JANUARY 15, 1990 PAGE FOUR the more extensive the repairs prior to an overlay will become. Streets that are not repaired while their rating is in this range will eventually require reconstruction as their only alternative. D. 0-69 Reconstruction These are streets which are not worth the investment of rehabilitating and therefore need to be completely reconstructed. The causes Of any problems which led to the poor condition of the street must also be addressed. The excavation of bad soils, placement of geotextile fabric . or construction of storm sewer are all possible additions that may be necessary to try to make the reconstructed road last as long as possible. Addressing the problem itself (poor roads) without addressing the cause of the problem (bad soils or excessive water) does not constitute prudent use of money. Currently, the existing rating data, shown on Exhibit 2 reflects the following total estimated project costs for street work required within the City (in 1990 dollars): Seal Coating Needs $ D2 ,800 Overlay ~Ieeds ~~'J.I~ Reconstruction Needs 968.800 TOTAL NEEDS ~ . I ;1~4,WO FEB- 3-';'3 WED 6:3:2 MAIER STE~.JART :;;, ASSOC. P.12I5 ., V V . CITY OF ARDEN HILLS JANUARY 15. 1990 PAGE FIVE New that the meaning of a street rating is defined, 1t 1s important to understand that these categories are not rigid boundaries. Rather, the categories are a tool to help organize the planning process of future street problems. To set up future street programs. it 1s important to know what types of work are best accomplished by the City itself. The Study originally recommended that the City institute a crack filling program. The number and type of cracks was included in the original field rating for each street with; n the City. However. the 1988 street program contracted out crack . filling work as part of the project. We are of the opinion that contracting out crack filling is a poor way to accomplish the work. Contracts for street work are usually performed in the Summer. but crack sealing is best performed in the Spring or Fall. when cracks are open at their wide$t. Crack filling is labor intensive work that is very difficult to measure for bidding purposes, The cost of having an outside contractor perform crack filling is very expensive since the work is typically small areas on a number Of streets allover the City. By hiring an outside contractor. the City is paying a premium price for crack filling work. We recommend that the City beg'in their 0\'10 crack filling program utilizing their maintenance- forces. As previOUSly mentioned. maintenance work. such as crack filling, is . typically needed on a number of streets throughout the City. This is also true of streets needing seal coating, Although the City is not tremendously large. the fact that it is separated by Interstate 694, U.S. Highway 10 and FEB- ;::-93 WED 8:33 MAIER STE~~ART & AS::=:OC _ P..0l5. , V V . CIiY OF ARDEN HILLS JANUARY 15, 1990 PAGE SIX various lakes makes getting around a little tough. To a contractor, "getting around" or mobilization costs, can become a rather large portion of small jobs sLier. liS see.l coating projects. We therefore would advi~e the City to group type~ of rlork wherever ~ossib1e, to minimize the amount of mOVing a contractor has to do. for example, if a group of streets in a particular neighborhood or area all have ratings of 90 or above, it would be economically wise to seal coat them all within the same street project. Bid prices should reflect the fact that all equipment necessary to complete the . work will be close at hand and operating the entire time it's on the job. A contractor therefore doesn't have to recover his costs associated with having equipment sitting on one job when it could be operating elsewhere. To a somewhat lesser degree, this same method of grouping similar types of work relates to overlaying streets. Materials are brought into a certain area and immediately used. 8y USing the ratings for each of the streets within the City as well as our beSt engineering judgement regarding grouping similar improvements, we have drafted a two (2) year street seal coating and overlay improvements program. The program is based on an annual City budget of $100,000. The fc11cw1ng tab'lCS ,I',.;;\> the proposed seal coating alid overlay progr'"ms for' both 1990 and 1991. . FEB- 3-93 WED :::: 33 MAIER STE....JART :?.. A=3S0C .. P.. '-3"7" . V V . CITY OF A~DEN HILLS ~ANUARY 15. 1990 PAGE SEVEN TABLE 1 PRELIMINARY 1990 STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM ESTIMATED PROJECT STREET FROM TO COST Seal Coating Karth Lake Ori ve Pleasant Drive Cul-De-Sac S 7,200 Pleasant Drive Amble Drive 2nd Cul-De-Sac 2,600 Pleasant Cin:le Lexington Cul-De-Sac 2,300 Amble Circle Amble Drive Cul-De-Sac 1. 000 Karth Lake C1rcle Hamline Avenue Cul-De-Sac 3,000 Nursery Hill Lane Hamline Avenue Nursery Hill Ct. 6,800 Nursery Hill Court Cul-De-Sac Cul-De-Sac 6,900 Dellwood Street Nursery Hill Ct. Amble Road 2,700 Overlay . Carlton Drive Tiller Lane nIl er Lane 32.300 Ri dgewood Road Lake Johanna Blvd, Arden Place 28,300 Skiles Lane (West) Snell ing Avenue Dead End 20.700 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $113.800 TABLE 2 PRELIMINARY 1991 STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM ESTIMATED PROJECT STREET FROM TO COST Seal Coating Brighton Way New Brighton Road New BrightOn Rd. $ 7,400 McCracken Lane Old Snelling Ave. Cul-De-Sac 7,800 BeCkman Avenue Lake Johanna Blvd. New Brighton Rd. 2,100 Lake Lane Lake Johanna Blvd. Dead End 2.500 Connelly Street County Road E County Road E 3,900 Grey Fox Road Lexington Avenue Frontage Road 6,600 Red Fox Road Lexington Avenue Frontage Road 10,900 Overlay . Dawn Circle (East) Norma Avenue Cul-De-Sac 12,700 Indian Oaks Court James Avenue Cul-De-Sac 19.300 Indian Oaks Trail Ham! i ne Avenue Cu 1-0e-Sac 30,400 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $103,600 FEB- 3-93 WE 1:1 S:34 MAIER STEWART ~ ASSOC:... P... &.21 :~: V V . CIry OF ARDEN HIllS J~NUARY 15, 1990 P~GE EIGHT The two street improvement programs are shown by Exhibit 3. Note that the total estimated project cost for both the 1990 and 1991 programs exceed S100.000. We anticipate that bids for the work could come in slightly lower given a good bidding environment. We have set up the programs in anticipation of completing as many streets as possible. However, if bids received exceed the project budget, streets may be deleted until the project is within budget. From an administrative standpoint, it is easier to set up a program and scale it down than to set up a small program and add streets after bids are received, . You will also note that the preliminary 1991 seal coating program includes two streets, Beckman Avenue and Lake Lane. which are somewhat separated from the rest of the streets to be seal coated. The area surrounding these two streets was included in the 1988 program. However, these two streets, which also are rated in need of seal coating, were omitted. Since many other areas also need seal coating, seal coating will likely not occur again in this area for five to seven years. Beckman Avenue and Lake Lane should be seal coated long before then however, so they have been included for 1991. ft is important to note that no streets rated in the Study as needing reconstruction are included in the 1990 or 1991 street improvement programs. These streets are not included since an annual budget of S100,OOO is not . sufficient to address reconstruction needs. The Study currently estimates reconstruction needs of nearly $970.000. A re-rating of the City streets would certainly increase this estimate to well over $1,000.000. FEB- 3-93 WED 8:34- t~AIER STEWART oJ:. ASSOC. P_09 'V V . CITY OF .ARDEN HILLS JANUARY 15, 1990 PAGE NINE We recorrrnend the City initiate programs to begin the reconstruction and financing of streets shewn in need by the Study, Possible financing options include assessments to benefiting property owners. use of Municipal State Aid Funds, use of City monies or a combination of various options. Preliminary discussions have been held by City staff regarding assessments and establishment of an assessment policy to meet reconstruction costs. We are available at your convenience to discuss any aspect of this Pavement Management Update or our thoughts regarding the implementation of the street improvement program. . Sincerely, MAIER STEWART AND ASSOCIATES, INC. ::;; M~t:~ ~L /t~ Mark J. Graham, P.E. MJG/km . FEB- 3-93 L.jED 6:35 t'l A I E R STEWART ASSOC. '" P _ 1121 EXHIBIT 1 comsm ~/liil: ') . - ..'~ v . v . FR. maca rme mm R SQ. C mm- F!. ~ S Y S D met 0 E SE(;!U: H m~ , 1 E D E t N A ~ , ! I , E L ! ! A I 1 I F 0 1 D J ! L i ~ P , 0 p. . P. I mltS I v I 0 ~ 1 S E a I. 0 , 1 U I E mm E B ~ 7 G 1 1 E B I. mE s L T I m~ TO S I. ! H eRAel P. I I S R VALUE i i 1 E 0 DlS mE ST. JE FRONTAGE 10. CUL DE SAC ROO 0 o 3.2 3.4 3.4 3.2 2.8 I.. 2.1 3,4 2.6 90 S 076 14TH ST. IE FROKT1G! 1.0.35R 13l' E1ST K 0 0 0 o U 2, 2. 2. 2.6 11.2 3. 2.1 3.2 Il S m lLLEY L1KE JOE1!&A 5L 'lIRYIE! AYE. ROO 0 o 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.l 16. 3./ 3.8 3.1 100 I OJ4 mLI m. ARm DR. CUL DE SAC ! 0 0 0 o l.4 3.4 3,43.1 3. 16.1 l. 3.4 3.1 !J S ala mL! OF.. LEXINGTON AVE. lARTE LAKt DR. I 6 H 15 200 l. U J.4 l.4 U !U U J.( 1.2 11 0 OJ! !KiLE iD. mmE m. DlAD m R 1 2i 15 300 3,4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 Ii. 3. 3.1 3.l 95 R 126A ARDEN OAr.S C~. ARDEN OAKS DR. CUL DE SAC a 1 10 30 o 5. i. 5, 5.4 5.6 II. 5.6 5. 1.4 16 I 126 ARDEN OAKS DR. SNELLING A~E. ee. )0. E B 3 3i 15 o 5. 5, 5. 5. S. 2i. 5. S. 5. !9 I 129 ARDES 1t.. smL!B~ AVE. mJ!P.DEN lD, B 6 lO 10 l50 l.8 3. 3. 3.4 l.i 14.6 3. 3.ll.6 il 0 116 ARm PL, sms CT. SHi:LLlNG AVE, H 2 20 24 600 2.2 3. 3. 3, l.l 13.6 2.1 3. 2.6 80 0 0&6 ARDBN YIEW CT. ARDEN YIEi 01.. eo. DE SAC 100 0 o l.J 3.4 3.6 3.4 l.4 17. 3.1 3.4 l.4 !! H 062 ARDE! V1EV DR. ROYAL BI.LS OR, !ll EAST ROO 0 o S. S. 5. S. S. 25. S. 5. :.. 100 I 065 ARDEN VIEW DR. HARLIR! AVE. !ll't.ROY.R!LLS Y 0 0 o SIOO 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 25. 5. S. 5. 15 I 06l ARDEN VISTA DP.. ROYAL Hlt.1S CT. COL DE SAC ROO 0 o S. 5. 5, S. S. l5. S. 5. 5. 100 R . 12l ASBORY m. so. CITY 1IMITS EDGEiATER AVE. ROO 0 o 3.2 3.2 3,2 3.4 l.4 1&.4 3.4 3.8 3.2 100 H 110 8EC~KA! AVE. IE! BR1GB~0! RD LA[E JOHABIA BL I 0 0 0 o 3. j.2 3.l 3.J l,8 15.4 3.2 3. 3. 93 S Oll BENTO! WAY mm~m. BARRIET AVE. Y 2 35 20 100 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 17. 1.4 2.6 3.4 79 I 054 BR!ARI.IOLL CIR. SNEL.IIO IVE. COL DE SAC Y 3 44 20 o 3, 3.4 3.1 3,4 2.6 15.1 3. l.6 3.4 18 I 053 5RIARKNOLL OR. IORNA AVE. BP.IARi.NOLL CIR. X 3 l2 20 o 3.2 3.2 3,2 3.2 /.1 15.6 3.2 3.1 3.2 !6 R O,l 8RIGBTOB YAY IEW 8RIGHTON RD BEi SRIGHTOK 10 I 0 0 0 o 3.2 3.1 3.1 3.4 3.1 16.1 2.6 3.8 3. 9( S Oil SI.IGHTOR WAY R. HRIGHTOH WAY eOL DE SAC X 3 40 15 o 3.2 l.l 3.2 3.4 l.l 15.2 j, 3.1 3, 13 S 093 BRIGB101 RAY S. SR1GBTOR VAY CUL DE SAC R 2 15 20 03.4 3.1 3.1 3.4 3.1 17. 2.1 3.8 3.2 91 S 116 8ROEBERRY L~. mmm DR. mm.l0 I 0 0 0 o 5, 5, 5. 5. 5, 25, I. 5. 5. 100 I 121 Bossm C1. S!ELLlHGAVE. cut DE SAC I 5 20 29 JI2I 2. 3, 3. 3.2 1.1 13, 2.... 1.1 45 R 015 CANNel lYE. DUILA1 S~. mLEP. LI. I 110 30 JOO 3.2 3.4 3.4 3.4 l. 16.1 1.1 l.1 J.2 93 S 011 W,L70R DR. mLEl LH, TILLER LB. H 0 0 o Il00 l.5 3.1 3.2 3.l 1.4 11.6 2.4 3.5 l, 72 0 089 CEATRAX AVE. SO. ce. RD. El COL DE SAC N 24 II 34 o 2.1 3. l, 3,4 I,! 13.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 13 0 Oil C5ATHA~ CIR. cmm AVE. CUI. DE SAC I I 20 34 o 2.1 3.4 3.4 l.1 2. 14.8 2.8 3.6 l. 17 0 090 cmm C~. cmmm. cut DE SAC Ii ~ 0 0 o 3, 3.2 3.2 3.1 2,4 15.2 2. 3.6 2.S Ii N 001 CO. la. 0 .tE1HGTOI AVE. S50P.SLI~E N 1 10 24 o 2.6 3,2 3.6 3.6 2.l li.1 2.4 l.6 2.8 I: I 02S co. RD. , LEXINGTON AVE, smm m. H 2 36 10 o 3.6 3.8 3.8 3.1 3.6 11.2 2.6 3.6 l.6 94 H OS! COLLEEI AVE. HmINE AVE, ReCLUMG DR. N 3 33 IS o 3.4 3.4 3.6 3.4 3.4 17.2 3.1 3.8 3.4 H I 060 COLLEEN CIR. COLLE!N DR. CUI. DE SAC I 1 15 31 o 3.4 3.4 3.4 3,4 3. 16.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 95 I 021 COXIELLY AYE. CUD. E co. RD. E H 0 0 0 600 3.6 3.~ J.6 3.6 3.6 11. l.4 3.1 3,J 89 I 085 CRYSTAL AVE. Fup'ymm, CO. RD. r Ii 330 lO 500 2.4 3.2 3,l 3.1 /,4 14.6 3.2 3.8 3.1 15 0 125 COMM1NGS LI. SNELLING m. DEAD EID ROO 0 o i. 5. 5. 5. 5, 2i. i. 5. 5. 100 J 051 om ClR. lomm. ~!5T eUL DE SAC NOD 0 o 2,13.8 3.1 3.4 4, 11.1 4. 4. I. 100 I m DAVI m. 10m AVE. EAST COL DE SAC I 1 lO 50 1020 3. 3. 3. 3.4 2,2 14.6 2.1 3,4 3. 73 0 010 DELLYI!. AVE. VEST GRAMSlS RD VENUS AVE. I 1 30 15 o 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 11. 3.1 1.1 3.1 II I . 014 DILLVIEY AVE. GRAmE RD. msmm. Ii 0 0 o 3000 l.l 3.2 l.2 3.4 3. IS.l 3.1 3.6 :.6 ;3 0 FAG! 1. ----------- -~ FEB- 3-'5'3 WED a: 3':. t., A I E R STEIoJAF<:T 8< ASSOC. F' _ 1 1 _.-;--=~ .-.:.-.- ) f': 1pP' ... ../., CO~lOS!'IE ~ . - \.....I \J . . fR, mm SQ, rmp KATm C p. mm- F~. G S i S V me! c E mm~ B KER~ L A I V t r. I A l r . Ell E j, i R 1 1 1 ; P 0 -- I A U I I L i T D f 0 I K R ! i mas I v K D G I S E I I 0 I 1 0 1 E I mEET I E B T T G T 1 E E I m E S j, . B I I , . fl.O~ 10 I S I E I ClACK I I l S K mOE I K 1 E 0 012 DSLLroOD AVE. TILm LN. 10, DEAD EfO 100 0 o S, S. 5. 5. 5. 25. 5. 5. S. WI Oll OELLiOOD ST. KOlSEP.Y BILL C1 AK.LE 10. . 1 14 10 o 3.2 3.2 l,2 l.2 2.2 15. 2.1 l.1 3, H 5 014 OUKLA! m. umsoli P.O. cmol m. N 1 30 to 8150 2.6 3.4 l.1 1,4 2.6 15.1 2. 2.8 2. 61 P- 026 omAP IT. GREY rOl. lO. RED tOl 10, 100 o 2600 2, l. 3.2 1.1 2. tl.4 2. 2.t 2.4 6, R DOl EDOmm AVi. mmTO~ An. DEAD m fE",j N 1 51 100 o 5. 5. 3, 5. 5. 25. 5. 5. S. lCO Ii 005 EDOEIATEI AVE. NEi .P.IGlTOI 10 1161'.,IE' BR!. I 0 0 0 300 5, 5. 5. 5. S. 25. S. 5. S. 55 S 106 IDGEIAT!R AVE. 1167'I.IEi IRI, COj, DE lAC I 0 0 0 o l.4 l.1 1.1 i.4 l.1 t7. 1.1 3.1 l,l H S 124 EDGEIATEP. AVE. ASBURY AVE. RlDGEioon RD. . 0 0 0 o 5. 5. 5, 5. 5. 25. 5. S. 5. 10C H 044 EiO! m. mmtlVE, CUj, DE SAC 100 0 150 3.2 1.4 l.1 3.4 3. 16,1 3, 3.2 3.2 ;; I 013 FAIRV!Ei AVE. maim. mmE1D. . 0 0 0 o 3,4 1.4 3.4 3.1 3.4 11. 1.6 I.a 3.a 100 I lOa FAIRV!II AV!. lLLBY GRANT RD. ! U 0 0 o 3.2 1.2 3.2 3.1 3.2 16.2 3.1 3.. 3.2 toe x 011 tArRVI!~ AVB. co. RD. P iEST GRAKS!! RO R 1 25 15 o 3.4 2.B :.1 3.2 3.2 15.4 ),1 1.B J.t 5! K 021 FERIWOOO AVE. Co. RU. f tlal' 10m I 1 52 15 o 3.4 3.4 1.4 3.1 l.a 17.2 2. 3. 2.6 93 S 007 FERniOOO C1. ING 81. SON Rn, m DE SAC . 1 12 ! 212 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 25. 5. 5. 5. a. 0 . 013 FE;,IWOOO ST. CAmON OI.IVE DoE, soura. I 0 0 0 o 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. ,5. S. S. s. IDe I 041 nom OR. EUm! m. VEST TO DtlDERD . 3 31 IS o 3. 3.1 3.4 3.1 2.6 15.8 1.. 1.' 1,4 8( 0 113 rop,m LI. mmm RD. smmem. I 2 26 20 o 3. 3.2 3.2 3,2 2.4 15. 3. 1.. 3. 51 S 02l FROITAGE RD. GREY fOl RD. 515' 10m N 0 0 0 03.4 3.1 3.4 l.6 3.6 11,4 3.8 3.t j,l U~ H 021 FRON,AGE RO, 115'R.OF GP.!Y F RED FOr. RD. E 1 10 21 o 3.1 3,4 3,1 1.1 3.. 17.2 3.4 J.2 l.2 9i Ii 01l F10ITAGE 10.15i BIGE~lY 5i mE ST. I 0 0 0 o I. 1. i.l 3.11.1 15.1 1. 3.6 l. 5/ . 014 FRONTAGE RO.llf 14TE IT. 13TE n. I 1 36 20 o 2.8 3. 3. l.4 2.a 15. 3. 3. 3.1 53 S 128 FROITAG!I!IELLI ARDEN PL, om 110 l 0 0 0 650 2.6 3.2 1.2 3.4 2.8 15.1 3. 3.6 3. II 0 041 GALE CIR. iES~ ILORhL OR. COL DE SAC I 0 0 0 o 1.: 3,1 3.2 1.: 1.2 16. 3.2 1.2 3.2 !5 I III GLEiAROEI C1, Simm m. SKILlS j,I, I 1 26 lO 2~0 5. 5. 5. 5. S. 25. S. 5. 5. ~S I ll~ G1SiARDEI RO, llOER PL, milRD!I CT. 100 0 6~0 l.1 3.2 3.1 3.1 2.4 II.. 1, l.8 2.6 10 0 122 GLEIE!LL Rn. HIGHWAY 51 ASEURY AVE. .00 0 o 5. S. 5. 5. 5. 25, 5, 5. 5. 100 ! 10S GLEiPAOL AVE. CLEVILAiD AVE, lEi BRIGHTON RP I 0 0 0 100 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 25. 5. 5. S. 95 S 086 GLENVIEI AVE. rAmlEi m. CRTSrAL AVE. 1 1 lO 20 3003.2 3.2 3.11.4 3.216.:1.8 3.8 3.8 55 . 0.7 GLERVIEW cT, GLERmi AVE, m DE SAC I 1 fQ 15 o l, 1. ), J.4 2.l1U 3.4 1.ll.4 85 S m GP.AKSIE RD. DEj,Lvm A'I!. ROj,LIIG BILLS RIO 0 0 o 1.4 3.1 l.4 l.1 3.4 17. l.1 l,! l.8 100 I 10l mn RO. rmvltim. BEi !RIGE10K 1.0 I 0 0 0 o 3,1 1.1 1.1 3.4 1.4 17. 3. 3.& 2.8 55 N 022 GREY FOX RD. LEXING,OE IVE. fROITlGE RD, f 0 0 0 o 1.2 I. 4. 3,1 4.2 15.8 3.2 I. l.a '5 I ll4 HARLINE lVE. nom DP.. T.I. 56 BOO 0 o S. 5. S. 5. 5. 2!. S. S. 5. 100 B QOj EARLINE AVE, INmSOn RD, TILm LB. .00 0 o l.8 3.1 3.2 3.1 3, 15.4 2.8 2.6 2.; !1 S 015 HA!RIET AVE. j,EXIR,TOl AVE. PIlE TREE DR. I 1 31 IS o 3.2 3.2 1.2 J.2 2,6 15.4 1.6 3.1 :.6 16 0 016 HUKT!P.S CT. SERTON iA! COL DE SAC 100 0 o l,2 3.4 3.1 1.4 1.1 16.1 l.i 3.1 :.1 Il S Oil IIOIAI OAES CIR 8AKj,IHE AVt. CUL DE SAC I 0 0 0 o 5. S. 5. 5. 5. 25. 5. 5. 5. 100 I 051 !IDIA! OAXS CT. JARIS lVE. COL DE SAC Y 1 26 10 650 1.6 i.2 ),2 l.4 2.6 15. J.2 l.6 2.1 78 0 OS5 IID!AI OAES TR. IAKLIIE AVE. mT TO CDS N 5 15 lO o 2.4 1.2 3.2 l.4 2.2 14.4 3.2 1.4 2.6 II 0 . 0!1 mlAl PL. CO. RD. E m D! SAC BOO 0 o 2.8 3.4 1.1 l.4 l.4 16.1 3.1 J.I 3.1 j( I PAG! 2. FEB- 3-93 I.....En ::: : 3E. t"1 A I E R STEWART & ASSOC. P.. 12 ~~....------, .,~ CO~rOSr!t C no- C'I"/~' ' ~ - ' v ~:. : ....:..!..: .-. ."..-.../ . . V . FP.. mliCH SQ. FIELD RA!IHG C I mm. n. G s I S 0 t1.A"1. 0 t mmT B mT L A E 0 t t N A ~ C Elf t L . I A I ! I P 0 A 0 I H L f ~ D r 0 I ~ 1. ~ , s P , mas i i II D G I ! E 1. 0 1 C 1 E , i mEET 'EIT1 G1 1 E E 1. RAVE S . . ! , I , I f1.0~ TO I S R E E C1.ACl P. R 1. S ! VALOE I I 1 t D , - 001 INGERSOll CT. meRSON RD. DUD EID I 0 0 0 lOO 5, 5. 5. 5. 5. 25. 5. 5, 2.8 It S 056 Jms m. IHDIAI OAKS 11.. 488' NORIe 5 0 0 0 o 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 l.4 17. l.4 3.1 3.4 100 I 056A mES m. COLLESS m. 13i' sO~l~a HOD 0 o 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 17. 3.4 3.8 3,1 100 I CH JAKES moo iEST fLORA. OF.. CDL DE SAC leD 0 o 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 16. 3.2 3.6 3.4 100 H 104 JA~!E CIRCLE lATE LANE U. H 0 0 0 o 3.1 3.1 3.8 3.1 I.l 19.6 I. 4.2 I.i 100 II 017 JAR ET CI. CO. RD. 1 CUL DE Si.C II 0 0 0 o 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.1 3.4 16.1 l.1 3.1 3.6 100 I 109 JERROLD AVE. 1010'I.NE. BRI. CUL DE SAC HOD 0 o 3.4 3,4 3.1 l.1 3.1 37. l. 3.1 3.2 100 I IDS JERROLD AVE. lEI BEIGETON RD 1010'1.!!' BRI. ! G 0 0 G 5. 5. 5, 5. 5. 25. 5. 5. 5. lOG I 015 KARTE LAfoE ClR. EAI.INE AVt. 2ND CUI. DE SAC K 0 0 0 o 3.4 3.4 3.1 3.1 3. 16.6 2. 1.1 3.2 II S OJl (A1.TR LAKE DR. P;E~SANT DR. CUL DE SAC K 2 35 15 o 3.2 3,4 3.4 1.1 2. 15.4 1.1 3.2 3.2 92 S 101 KATE LN, CLEVELAND AVE. DEAD END J 0 0 0 o 3.1 l.1 3,1 3.8 4.4 19.6 I. 1.2 4.2 100 N 061 (EIIRSO. DR. RIGBIAY 96 DEAD m ISC.I ! 0 0 0 o S. 5. 5, 5, 5. 25. 5. 5. 5. 100 I OSI Lm LN. ~~[E JORANNA BL DEAD END IES~ J 0 0 0 o 1,1 3.( 3.4 3.4 3.2 16.2 1. 3.6 2.6 13 S 00lA 1m ~R. EDGEVATER AVE, DEAD END IIC.I N 2 15 5 o 2.8 3.4 3.4 3.1 J.I 16.1 3. 3.6 3.2 89 S . Gol LAIE SRORE PL. B:GBiAY 96 mEYAY 10 lOG 0 G 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.1 2.4 15.1 3. 3.1 l.1 95 I , 120 LAIETT! m. Lmm LR. cu. DE SAC 100 0 I 5. 5. 5, 5. 5, 15. 5. 5. 5. 100 I 119 Lmm LI. SIELL!NG m. CUI. DE SAC i 0 0 0 o 5. 5. 5. 5. 5. 25. S. 5. 5. m J m KcC.UIG D1.. COHm AVE. SNmm AVE. ! 0 0 0 o l.l3.13.13.43.6 11.2 3.1 3.4 1,4 100 I oaa KcC1Ae!E! Li. 0.0 R1G.WAY 10 CUL Dr lAC II I 1I IS o 2.8 3,2 3,2 3.4 2.6 15.2 3,4 1.8 3.6 89 5 101 10m lD. lEV BRIGBTON 10 FAIRVIEi AVE. . 0 0 0 200 !, 5. 5. 5. 5, 15. 5. 5. 5. 95 I 151 10m m. IRIARIHO.L DR. COLLEEN AVE. 100 0 400 5. 5, 5. 5. 5. 25. 5. 5. 5. 5l S 050 IOR~A An. BRIARlHOLL 01. III' SCUTB HOD 0 o 4. (. I. 1.4 4. 19.1 4, I. 4. IGO I 050A 10m m. eaL-Dr-SAC 152' 10m I 0 0 0 o C, 4. I. 3.4 4. 11.1 4. 4. I. ml 046 10EIA m. iEST fLCRAL DR. CUL DE SAC . 0 0 0 o 3. 3.2 3.2 3.1 3.1 16. 3.2 3.2 3.2 II S 027 10RTliOODS DR. REO FOX lD. DEAD EiD . 0 0 0 o 4.1 4.8 I.a C.I 1.8 24. 1.1 1.1 4.1 100 I 031 RuRSERY EILL CI JU1.SERY EILL LM COL DE SAC I III 20 o 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.4 1. 11. 3. 4. 3. Ii I 036A IURSERY HILL LX NURSERY I!LL e1 393' 10RT: I i 26 IS o 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 2.2 15. 2.1 3.1 3. II 5 ~3i NURSEF.Y EILL Li BA~LIHE AVE. 110' EAST I 6 26 15 o 1.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 2.2 15. 2.8 3.1 3. 13 S !11 mm, LA1.& JOBAMHI BL CUL DE SAC H 5 H lS o 2.8 l, 3. l.1 2.2 11.4 3. 1.1 2.1 H 0 13S PAR1.SSCEE DR. OLD iiY. 10 CUL-OHAC 100 0 o S. 5, 5. 5. 5. 25. 5. 5. 5. 100 I 127 PASCAL AVE, CO. RO, a DEAD m I 0 0 0 o 1.1 l. 3. 3. 2.4 II. 2.6 l.i 2.1 Ii 0 020 PIHa TRtl DR. Rmmm. CO, aD, B I I 15 31 o 5, 5. 5. S. 5. 25, S. 5. I. 100 ! 031 PLEASANT CI1. LEXINGTON AVE. CUL DE SAC 100 0 o 3.2 3.2 l.2 l.t 3.1 16.4 2. l.2 2.1 n s 032 PL,ASANT DR. [ARTS LAr.E DR. 130'5.0; PLEAS. I 0 0 0 o l.2 l.1 l.1 3.1 1.8 16.1 2. 3.1 3. 13 S Ol2A PLEkSANT Dl. mLE Dr.. 130'S.01 PLEAS, ! 0 0 0 o 3.2 3,4 l.4 3.1 l.a 16.1 2, 3.4 1. 11 S 101 mOR m. CO, lD. 0 Dm SNO lOP.!. I 0 0 0 400 5. 5. 5. S. 5. 25. 5. 5. S. 95 J 025 REO POX RD. fRoNmE P.D. LEXINGTON AVE. ! 4 12 12 50 3,2 3.4 3.( 3.6 3.4 17. 2. 3.62.6 51 S III RIOGEIOOO CT. mmOOD lD, m D, SAC H 0 0 0 lOa 5, 5. S. 5. 5. 25. S. 5. S. is i 115 RIDGEVOOD RD. LA1., JOEAN_A B. AP.DE~ PL. X 3 20 21 2115 2. 3. 3. 3.2 2.1 13.1 2.6 3.& 1,1 69 0 . 150 RIDGEIOOD ED. SO. CITY L!H!TS DEAD END II 1 30 21 o 2.a 2.! 2.6 1,1 2.1 1l.6 2.1 2.1 2.( 71 i PAGE 3, , . , FEE- ::;-93 "'ED 3:37 r'1A I ER STEWART '" ASSOC... P. 13: _.....:....:'":""--~ CIj~rCSr1E C:i!E;O!!~ . - . " . V V . n. mm SQ. nm mUG c f. mm- r7. ~ S r S 0 mcr. 0 E mml i mr ~ A S U t 1. K A ~ C t . i S L I I I I I U , e I I U I I L \' T 0 r 0 I k I k , i mas , s E I f. 0 , 1 U 1 E , k D ~ . I mm E B T T G T A t t I RAW E S L f B I I m~ TO S I ! S CIACr. I I R S B mOE B I T E 0 -- ISO IID.EWOOD 10. se. CITY LIB ITS DEAD EBD I 1 30 14 o 5, S. 5. 5. 5, 25. 5. 5. 5. 100 0 062 ROLL!R~ IILLS I V~IUS lVE. GRAmE 10. B 1 30 15 o 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.1 3. 16.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 11 B 06! lOYAL IILLS DR. SIELLIIG AVE. ARDEI VIti Dr.. 100 0 o S. i. 5. S. 5. 25. 5. 5. 5. mB 045 lOYAL Ll. iEST fLO/.AL LI. KORKA AYE. . 3 JI 20 o ),6 3.6 l.i U 2.i 11, 3.2 3,6 3.6 56 I III SANDEEN RO. LAXE ,OEAISA BL LAXE JOffARNA 5L roo 0 o 3.2 J.2 J.2 3.4 3.2 16.2 3.4 3.8 3.6 100 H O.IA SiR VICE CDS ALONG S. T.E. 11 NOD 0 300 2.1 1,1 1.1 ),1 1.1 13.2 1.4 3.8 2,6 84 0 068 SERVICE lD.B.IO ALONe S.T.E. 10 100 0 o I. 4.2 U I. 1.2 lU 3.8 4.6 3.8 100 N 006 saORtLINE LI, EDGEVAIER AVE, DEAD tND ISO.I 100 0 o 3.E l,6 3,6 3.6 3.. 18. l.4 4,2 l.6 100 5 002 SHORELINE LN. CO, 10. 0 DEAD m BOO 0 70 3.4 3.4 3.. 3.1 3.8 37.4 3. J.6 2.1 94 1 112 560REWOOO Di.. cU~ PE SA: Lm JORAm PR K 0 0 0 o 5. 5, \. 5. 5, 25. 5. \. 5. 100 k :14 SlEKS CI. LAXE JOHANNA 6. eUL DE S~: N 0 0 o Ii,l 1.8 2.4 2.4 2.6 1.8 11. 2.6 3.4 1.~ 64 I III SKILES LN. fAST SNELLI!G lVE. GLEmDEN RD. BOO 0 o 2.6 3. 3. 3.4 2.1 !4,2 1.1 2.8 2.1 10 0 13, SKILES LN. VESt SIELLI!G lVE. mom N 2 2! IS 400 2.. l. 3. l.4 1.6 13.4 2.8 3.6 3.2 7! 0 064 SNEL.IRG AVE. Bi.IARKkOLL elk. BIGHiAY 96 V 0 0 o l1250 I.! 1.1 1.6 3.4 1.4 11.4 2.2 3.2 I.! 42 R . 095 raOK Ol. CLEYELABD AVE. IEI' !<IGETO! RO I 1 10 20 o 3.1 l.' 3.4 3.4 J.6 17.2 3.4 J.8 J.4 100 R 010 1ILLER LB. amIl! m. m!I~TOX AVE. I 6 12 o J,OOO 2.1 l. l. 3.2 1.2 13.6 2.2 3.8 2.2 6J k 070 VALENTINE AYE. OLP BIGHVAY 10 co. RD. f 100 0 600 2,6 2.1 2.8 3.4 1.1 14.4 2.8 l.l 2.8 8i 0 072 VALENTINE Ci..RD VALENTINE AVE. COL DE SAC R 3 20 18 300 2.8 l. 3, 3. 1.1 li.6 1,1 J.4 3.4 n 0 071mmm eT, VA.ERT;,. AVE. CUL DE SIC H 0 0 0 03.2 l.ll.2 3. 3.215.8 2.8 3.1 3.i " X 081 mus m. DELLym m. lOLLING BIL~S R 5 4 JO 15 OJ.' l.. 3,4 3.4 J, 16.6 3.6 l.6 J.6 91 I 011 mOoK fL. BENTOl ill CUL DE SAC 100 0 o l.. l.4 l.. l.13.4 11. 1.4 3,4 3.. 90 S III iEOGEVeOp ell., OLD BiY. 10 COL-DE-SAC.iEST I 0 0 0 o 5. 5. 5. 5, 5. 25. S. 5. S. 100 I 040 WYNCREs! CT. BmlNE m:. ,JI' VESj I 1 1\ l4 o 3.6 3.! l.! 3.' 3.1 17,! l.2 l.. 3.4 9l S OIOA iYKCRSST CI, 231'i.01 RAKLIN CUL-D.-SAC IJ153/ 03.63,63.6 l.1 ),417.6 l.2 3.6 3.4 91 R 041 iYNCR~ST LN. meREST CT. mm~E DR, 100 0 o l.! l.! 3.6 3.4 l.6 11.8 l.. l.v 3.1 100 . 042 iYIRIOG~ DR. imus: CT. m Di SAC Il3/15 o 3.! 3.6 l.6 l.1 l.1 17.8 3.1 l.I ).4 '* I . PAGE 4. . ! . CITY OF ARDEN HILLS MEXIWiOOM ~: February 8, 1993 TO' Mayor, Ocunci'''''''''....'''S mn Dorothy Person, City l\dmini.strator ~@ Terry Post, city J\I::Countant SUBJECl': Mditional New Business Item on 2/8/93 Ocuncil1\qenda Request for authorization to expen:i funds in the estilnated amount of $19.400 for additional project costs related to the remediation of corrt:.aminated soils discovered in association with the removal of the City's underground fuel tank in December, 1992. The request to spend additional funds at this level is contingent upon the MPCA accepting the environmental engineer's (Dahl & Associates, Inc.) recommendation that no additional remedial work is required. 90% of these estilnated contaminated soil costs are eligible for reilllbursement frOlll the Minnesota Petrofund. The environmental engineering finn retained by the contractor will initiate the re:in1bursement pr=ess on behalf of the City and forward . all applicable supporting documentation to MPCA. RECX:M-IDIDATION: If Council concurs, they should pass a motion authorizing the expen:iitures of $19,400 for soil remediation, upon receipt of dOCLmler1tation that no additional remedial work is required and direct the engineering finn to suJ:mit dOCLmler1tation for reilnbursement to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. TRP:rk Attactnnent . I ~ "- 1;t!L/l-ci [LCil _________u___ C~ /{; J /7 ":~ .~ .~.z.. q~~ (I> ",-,-r... ~'- " ~ MINNESOTA PETROLEUM SERVICE, INC. Y , MINNESOTA PETROLEUM 5333 University Avenue N.E. CUSTOMER NO, 01379 SERVICE. INC. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55421 . ~ (612) 571-8490 INVOICE DATE 2/4/93 FAX (612)571-1087 ~[M~~~~ NO. 29117 SOLD TO: City of Arden Hills SHIP TO: Same KW 1450 lJ. Hwy. 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112 Your Order No. Our Order No. Order Date Service Date Terms Upon Receipt Quantity Description Total B.O. Or'd Ship Amount Remove gas tank per bid of 12/10/92 3,878.00 Excavate, stockpile and cover with poly 238.65 cu. yards of contaminated soil @ $6.18 per yard 1,474.68 Remove and dispose of asphalt to excavate additional contaminated soil 350 sq. ft. @ $1.15 per sq. ft. 402.50 Replace with clean fill from area where contaminated soil . was removed from 200 yards @ $9.20 per yd. 1,840.00 {,77') . Holding time per raquest of environmental to do additional eM .... \ r..,IO_DGI soil testing before removal of contaminated soil machine and (2) men 437.00 Load and haul 238.65 cu. yds. of contaminated soil to C.S. McCrossen @ $8.05 per yd. 1 ,921 .13 Burn 238.65 cu. vards of contaminated soil at C.S, McCross n "er bid @ $42. 44 oer cu. verd 10,128.31 Extra environmental wcrk due to contaminated soil problems 3,297.08 * This billinG includes environmental work through Jan. 11 th 1993. We will invoice as other billinos arrive in our office. TAXAaLE MATERIALS TAX A SERVICE CHARGE OF 1.50% PER MONTH WILL BE MAOE ON PAST DUE ACCOUNTS. LEINS WILL BE FILEO. EQUIPMENT RENTAL/FREIGHT Labor Hrs@$ IHr. . Labor Hrs@$ IHr. VEHICLE CHARGE THANK YOU PAY THIS AMOUNT $ 2~:70 Precision Tank Testing @Ji -:"I~I ~5 l!.t:J 1.' jbB "e I - - INSTALLATION MAINTENANCE SERVICE c.w\ or ~~ HH..L5 () i01rBlq) . U}o.:\l)QI..C:.~",() ~c... \"'t,,~A.. ;l.(.'i\Ojf1t.. ((Y: rs -~ \ L.. /1\ J ~ 1- \~ (l~0J.A1.. ('c1ot$ \~~L \0 \- '-'I \q~o - ~OO -:;~fB,CO ,<\L\) \ 0, - 11 \ hb- 5"000 '2..\, 7&,8:70 - ~~-,<o. 00 .::: " gqO.,O ~: ff.~~\d) MuL. fN.J~~ ~C:, l".{lC~ l!-.o {;; (0" ')<:, (~ ,-"'DO 4< \,1') "'i f5,\ \ ~0q" '30 . ~ ~;, CD.N'1"').r1'Il~ ';.'L (oc,i) ,~ ~CO. 00 q (ftc, ?f:T~~M) RG:.'E.' -IN'.JLt \91'2. \01 - '~2Do-(y::X) \ \7 I 'ibo. 00 ,qq) \ 0\ - '~"2.00 '(, 'i (,0..<.:0 \0/0 ~O~- jLE:lN\~V".<;'M~t: (0<;15 \q~1.. \ 0\ - '1' ~'tO -S~O \q'-TO.. DO 19<t-z, ,t>\ - q, ~~D - Sro;- \ qtO. OU . e!/01/93 11:11 2: E.12 490 3777 Dj;jHL &. ASSOC. P.03 DAHL INVOICE & ASSOCIATES, INC. NO. " . fmjlOflfTlafJtBJ Consul~ C<>'lr.l= & Engi"""'" 6~'~()c~ 4390 McMenemy Road Saint Paul, Minnesota 55127 (612) 490.2905 . FAX {612) 490.3777 PAGE :1. Ei ~r l1NVE3~~?2 I ~III'II"IES()T,', F'E:TF\OLEI.Ji'1 BEI'N I C I,: 0 I'IPS - CITY elF' AFmn,1 HH..LB L l'IIi:.. 1<1:::1'1 vJII'IGAI'<:D B 14:,0 W. HuN 96 I... 53:5~1 UHIVEF~SITY AVU.JUE I~E ARDEN HILLS, I'll', 5~':l :1.2 1'1 I I~I'II;::AI"OL IS, 1'11>.1 e.::;:,421 1>.1 T 0 (J INVOICE DATE INVOICE NO, CUSTOMER NO. PAYMENT TERMS CONTRACT NO. 12/31/92 6~~06 1\1N3272 ~IET 30 DAYS 3;~72 LJI>.I!T E:XTEI'IDEJ QU''''II~TITY DESCIUI"TJ.ON Pli:ICE PIUCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES . .50 Hr's', CI_EIi:ICAL 24..0000 :l. ~':~ " ( 21'..::')0- H!"'~; ASSISTAt4r. PROJECT I'IANI',GER".. 55.0000 :1.,171.: 2..00-- Hrs prmaECT DIli:r::CTOR' 85.0000 :I. 70.. ( . TOTAL PRClFESSIOI,IAL SEIi:VICES .. 1!1 ::)~~\:J" ~ EQUIPI1EI'IT 3El.00 EA son. SAI'IPL.E JARS .6600 ~':"o I" ~ .l:''':~ " I.. 1..00 DAY FLAI~F~ IOI'lll-AHOI" Dr::n-::CTOR 125..0000 :l;~~~,,( :L.OO DAY 1-11'11.) r([:'J>.jTAL 90.0000 90..(' :LO.OO I'll MILEAGE @ $.38 PER MILE .3800 :3.. ~ TOTAl... E(;lI.):i:F'I'IE~IT ;:~l~::)" E .- OTHEJ:;: l..AHC)l'(,',TClRY TESTS 1.!l ::~69.. t TOTAL OTHI:::I:;: :l. ~2t)9,,6 TCnr~L. DUE TI.11S INVClICE: 2 ~l a67 ,. C . 115 :. ;:l, '" .1" '.; ...- -...... t. r,mOS~3 I:;:ETAII':,"GE T,^-lX l'Ii:::T AI'ICJl.n,n :i:~.. B67" 03 ..00 .00 ~.~.~" D(i'7" ( . I Mnlt11'm CITY OF THE ARDEN HILLS, KDI!IESOrA l'I.l\NNXN3 CXHWISIctl MEETIN3 WEDlESDAY, J!~Y 3, 1993 . 6:30 P.M. - CITY lmLL Cl\LL TO CIlDER Clair Probst called the meetin:] to order at 6:30 p.m. to corrluct an informational meetin:] with Recreational Vehicle owners. ROLL Cl\LL Present: Clair Dennis Probst, Members Jeanne Winiecki, Barbara Piot:rowski., Ray McGraw arrl Dave Carlson. Absent: steve Erickson arrl Scott Petersen. Also present: Councilmembers Dale Hicks, Beverly Aplikowski. arrl Paul Malone, Planner Jdln Bergly, Build.i.n:J Inspector David Kriesel arrl Recording Secretary Renee I Kaulfuss. INFCJIl!oIMICGU. MEEl'DI; ctl PROPOSED REalEM'IctlAL VEHICLE REGUIATIONS: Planner Bergly presented the revised Recreational Vehicle Regulations to the audience both in handout form arrl oral presentation. Clair Probst requested the sign in sheet arrl opened the ni"""lSSion to the first name on the sign in sheet. Followin:] are sununarizations of resident concerns: 1- Jim Ross stated the followin:]: . . '!he appearance from the street of an IN parked alongside of a garage is the same with a larger IN as with a snaller IN. He preferred any reference to length be deleted. . Would like to see the FlY regulations handled urrler the Nuisance Ordinance. . '!he fewer laws the better . Maintenance is the issue for havin:] the IN accessible on their property . 2. Mrs. Ross commented to the Commission that they did a good job addressin:] the issues raised by FlY owners, arrl requested that the City doesn't require hard surfaces like black top or cement vs gravel for parking IN's. 3. Virginia Forside stated her questions were answered. 4. Judy Tekautz stated her questions were answered. 5. Romelle croswell stated she strongly supports Jim Ross's issues. She requested a confirmation of the definition of front yard arrl buildable area. 6. Les Croswell questioned whether there will be a variance process pennitted for a person with a large front yard setback arrl no back yard accessibility. He could show a hardship because of unusual lot con:litions. 7. David Fritz noted a 1947 Supreme Court rulin:] that the City cannot pass an Ordinance over Federal law. Mr. Fritz suggested the City Attorney look for errors. . Take off the length requirement, leave open ended. . . Require parking of FlY's on gravel with drainage. I . plaJmin<T n.....;qion Meetina 2 2-03-93 8. Milton Sawyer stated: . Has a minimum sideyard. Feels variance process is. very . difficult . Disagreed with ordinance CXlI1cept. Doesn I t see the problem that the City is attemptm. to =ect. . Use the nuisance ordinance to enforce complaints. 9. Harold Ableiter stated: . Disagrees with number of restrictions and length requirements. . Are we justified in drafting an ordinance that relates to aesthetic considerations? . Where is the logic behind ordinance as it relates to zonm. =iteria of peace, health, safety or welfare of the COI11lTPJl1ity? 10. Joseph vodonik stated: . Make variance automatic with neighbor's consent. . Suggested Commission/Council read JUne 1 wall street Journal . Parking in driveway for 72 hours is more than enough time. . Increase the 7 days to 2 weeks for visitors. 11. Mt'. & Mt's. Anderson stated they were in compliance, but the neighbor's dog continually barked at the FN and when they moved their FN so the dog would't see it, the dog stopped barkm. and everyone was happy. With the new changes, he would have to again have the FN in the dog's sight and the barkin:J will start again. 12. stan Keeley wants to see documentation of the complaints. . How many FN's are in the city? . How many complaints? . Does not feel there should be a difference for Iakeshore Property owners vs. Non-laIceshore property owners. . . Who will enforce this ordinance? Is there the manpower? 13. OWen Rasmussen wants to know why he has to look at an abandoned school bJs. Enforce Ordinance. 14. Bruce Kilander stated he is a new resident to Arden Hills and he feels neighbors should be neighborly and work out arrangements together . Why should a neighbor have to get a Special Use Fermi t if the neighbors don't object? He would like to see the 12 complaints addressed in the New Brighton Bulletin. Names are not necessary, but date and year of complaint needed. Secretary sul:Initted comments from other residents - 3 in typed fomat. Chair Probst closed the intomational meetm. at 7: 40 pn and thanked everyone present for their comments and concerns. After a brief recess, Commission reconvened for their regular meetm. at 7:48 p.m. 1\PPRCl\IE MINllTES Carlson noted on Page 6, Case #92-23, Carlson moved, seconded by Erickson, to approve the Minor SUbdivision/lDt Consolidation at 1585 Johanna Blvd. Carlson moved, seconded by Probst, to approve the Revised January 6, 1993, Plannm. Minutes. All voted in favor. (5-0). . , plaDI';na n.....i"Sion MeetiJxJ 3 2-03-93 Cl\SE #93-01: POBLIC HEl\RING. POD AMEtlI:MENT FCR AlDDlG '1WO l.lNITS TO EDGEWATER . ESTATES '1'aOlII[I(ES. PAUL JI'F.I'.F.II1'!Jt Clair Probst opened the public hearinJ at 7:50 p.m. Case #93-01, POD Amendment for addi.n;J two units to Fdgewater Estates Townhanes. Rec:ordi.rq Secretary, Renee Kaulfuss confinned the publication of the Notice of HearinJ in the New Briahton Bulletin on Wednesday, January 20, 1993, and mailinJ to affected property owners on the same date. Planner Bergly referred to his report dated February 3, 1993, relatinJ to the applicant I s request for approval of an Amen:Jment to the previously approved and nearly COIlpleted development of the POD for El:igewater Estates Townhomes. (Case #87-26) . '!he amerrlment is to :incorp:lrate an abanioned City sewer lift station site (.34 acres) into the existinJ POD and allow the construction of 2 townhouse units on the site. since these will be owner-occupied units, a preliminary plat is also proposed to form two lots - one for each townhouse unit - and =ntiguous comrron space around the two lots. As the City lift station has remained in the R-1 District, rezoning to R-3 will also be necessary . 'Ibis amerrlment to the POD Concept Plan will be followed in a month with the POD General Plan. Bergly reviewed the considerations listed in his report. Unler the proposed zoninJ 34+ units would be allowed and this proposal would have 3 units less than would be allowed by either the existinJ or the . proposed Ordinance regulations. ~e adjoining apartment site (part of the original POD) combined with the entire townhouse site will have an overall density of approxlirately 4.4 units/acre which is slightly under the townhouse density allowed in the present Ordinance. All other Ordinance requinnents of the site plan are well within stan:lard ordinance regulations. ~e lots are approximately the same size as lots for the other townhouse units . A Final Plat will be suJ::rnitted along with the Final POD documents . A zonin:J district change fram the existinJ R-1 District to the required R-3 District nulSt be made durinJ the General Development (Final Plan) Approval Stage. It adjoins an existinJ R-3 District and is consistent with the Corrprehensive Plan that designates the site as ''Medium Density Residential". with respect to the gradinJ plan, a large stockpile of ear"'..h located on the site will be used to brinJ the blildinJ site up to an elevation slightly above the adjacent street grades. A proposed. benn west of the SW corner of the west lot is approximately 6 feet above the adjacent Bl:ueberry centerline and about 8 feet above floor level. I.owerinJ the berm about 2 feet will achieve a more natural appearance. It appears that a stand of trees between the proposed units and the ones just to the west may be on the edge of the area to be graded. Care should be taken to protect the trees fram either fillinJ or gradinJ over their . root system. The Grading Plan will have to be approved by the RaID and suggests that this occur between this Master Plan and the Final Plan. A more detailed grading construction plan will have to be suJ::rnitted for Final Plan approval. ~e small wetland to the north will need to be protected blt that will be shown on the erosion control plan suJ::rnitted I p' ..nn; ng ".....; ..sion Meetil!q 4 02-03-93 to the RQoID. Bergly noted that although the larrlscape plan meets the ordinance . requirements in terms of caliper inches for trees, it will need scme reorganization in tree locations relative to the berms and accepted landscape design. It will also require foun:lation plantin:Js ~le to the existing units. 'lbe units will be patterned after those already constructed. Negotiations for the sale of this property by the City, resulted in a price that includes value for park dedication. All requirements of both the existing and proposed ordinances have been met, so waiver of the IlIOratoriUl1\ to allow the City to act on this application is appropriate. Planner Bergly recormnended the following actions: 1. '!bat the MoratoriUl1\ Ordinance be waived. 2. '!bat the concept Plan (Master Plan) for POD Amendment be approved. 3. Approve the Preliminary Plat for 2 additional lots and common open space. Planner Bergly summarized the issues to be addressed in the General Development plan and reminded the commission, a public hearing is also required at this stage: 1. Rezoni.rg from R-1 to R-3 . 2. Final Plat 3. Final Grading Plan and approval from RCWD. 4. Revised landscaping Plan. Clair Probst asked if there were any questions or comments from the floor, hearing none, he closed the public hearing at 8:00 pm. Clair Probst asked if there were any questions or canments from the Commission. '!he issue of the benn along the Parkshore Drive between Brueberry and Old Highway 10 was discussed briefly. Ray McGraw mentioned he would prefer to see the height of the benn along parkshore Drive be in =nformance with the original grading plan for the POD. eouncil1nernber Dale Hicks mentioned he would like to see the natural drainage restored at the SE corner of the original POD site (Parkshore and Old Hwy 10) rather than depending on a culvert \Yhich rray clog or freeze. Planner Bergly stated two meetings have been held with the developer and IlIOSt of the residents to modify the benn height. COmpromises have rrade between the developer and the residents. Clair Probst reminded the Commission both the benn issue and the P. U. D. . Amendment will be back on the March Planning agenda. .. . . . . . plannina o.~....;"''''ion Meet;'YT 5 02-03-93 . Winiecki questioned the density if the Parkshore Apts were not included in the calculations provided. Planner Bergly stated the density (31 . units) is the same as allowed in the original P.U.D. approval and the overall density includirg the MO:;uire apartments is less than allowed in the present R-3 District. McGraw l1lOved, seconded by winiecki, to recommend to Council to waive the Development Moratorium ordinance. All voted in favor. (5-0). piot.rc1.vski moved, seconded by Carlson to recommend to Council to approve the Concept Plan Amendment and the Preliminary Plat for 2 additional units in the Etigewater Estates Development. All voted in favor. (5-0). DISClJSSICE: cmIER PLlOOl:ING :ISSUES Ray McGraw suggested that a statement listirg the responsibilities and authority of the Planning Commission be read at the beginning of each Planning Commission meetirg. He stated that the Commission only listens, evaluates and recommends and in his opinion the public does not fully understarxi camnission responsibilities. Chair Probst outlined the concerns heard earlier this evening from the RV infomational meetirg. He asked the Commission if they preferred to 0;<:('1155 changing any of their rec:omrneroations or preferred to present the changes to the Council for review and final recommendation. Carlson moved, secorxled by Winiecki to recommend to Council the Revised Zoning Ordinance for their consideration. All voted in favor. . (5-0). Chair Probst requested Commission members corouct a special session prior to February 19, 1993 to consider developirg a Master Plan for the Arsenal property . Chair Probst stated he met with the Mayor, Terry Post, Dick Wedell, Terry Shutten, Paul Kirkwold, and Terry Lin:1eke. Ramsey County is interested in obtaining a site on the Arsenal property and wishes to discuss joint use of the facilities. Probst indicated the DNR and nearby cities are also interested in obtainirg or usirg portions of the Arsenal site. '!he Commission agreed to meet at City Hall on February 10, 1993 at 7:00 pm. axJNC:IL REPC:'RT Counci1member Hicks reported on items of interest to the Commission. Hicks indicated a developer has approached council r~ development of the Gateway Business District. A preliminary sketch was subnitted and further information is to be forwarded at the February Worksession meeting . 'IWo applications have been received for the Council position. Interviews will take place shortly. . He informed the staff that the City Administrator, Dorothy Person had been in a car a=ident and is recuperatirg. --...--.--.--- , . . P'''Ym;1VT n...,.;"sion Meetina 6 2-3-93 . . Both Hicks and Aplikowski commended the Commission on their meeting with . the FlY owners. AnJOURN carlson !lIOved, secoooed by pi~ to adjourn at 9:00 p.m. Olair Dermis Probst . .