HomeMy WebLinkAboutCCP 01-31-1994
** REVISED **
AGENDA
.
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEETING
NEW BRIGHTON CITY HALL
MONDAY, JANUARY 31, 1994, 6:00 P.M.
6:00 PM Closed Meeting - Update on Union Negotiations.
7:30 PM 1. Call to order/roll call
7:30 PM 2. Agenda adoption
7:30 PM 3. Public Hearing - Continuance of the Assessment Hearing relating to the 1993
Arden Place Drainage Improvement project, and Revised Assessment for
property loca1ed at 1553 Arden Place.
7:35 PM 4. Approval of minutes: a. January 10, 1994, Worksession Meeting
b. January 10, 1994, Regular Council Meeting
7:40 PM 5. Consent calendar: -
. a. Approve the additional monetary limits of LMCIT Excess Liabjlity
coverage.
b. Approve Resolntion #94-16, Accepting the 1993 Pay Equity Report,
and approve snbmission of the report to the State Department of
Employ" R,I,do"" f
c. Approve Resolution #94-10, Amending Resolution #93-61, es hing
an expanded Economic Development Committee.
d. Approve Resolution #94-11, Adopting a Flexible Spending Accoun1:
reimbursements for Out-of-Pocket medical expenses, health cue
premium and daycare expenses; and the Administrative Services
contract with DCA, Inc.
e. Approve Resolution #94-12, Revising Mechanical Fee Schedule,
f. Approve list of 1994 Business license renewals.
g. Approve List of Claims and Payroll.
** h. Approve Resolution #94-17, Support of the application for a
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) by Northwest You1h &
Family Services (NYFS).
7:45 PM 6. Public Comments
7:50 PM 7. Unfinished and New Business
a. Plan nine: Commission
. Ryder Student Transportation/Reeo - Case #93-15, Recommendation
to deny the request for a rezoning.
Ryder Student Transportation/Reeo - Case #93-15, Review of the
Planning Commission's tie vote on the mo1ion to approve the
------
Comprehensive Plan amendment.
8:30 PM b. Continuance - Storm Water Management Appeal - Arden View
Townhome Association.
8:45 PM c. Discussion of public informational meeting relating to the 1994 .
Pavement Management project; and
Review the feasibility study and possible adop1ion of Resolution #94-
13, Receiving the Feasibility Study and Ordering a Public Hearing on
the Improvement in the Matter of the 1994 Pavement Maintenance
Improvement project.
d. Discussion and possible adoption of Resolution #94-14, Ordering
Preparation of Plans and Specifications in the Matter of the 1994
Pavement Maintenance Improvement project.
9:00 PM e. Discussion and appointment of Economic Developmenl Committee
members - Mr. Charles Stoddard and Mr. Trygve Egge.
9:05 PM f. Review request for a Class A Premises Permit at Pot O'Gold Bingo
Hall from Church of St. Mary Romanian Orthodox and approval of
Resolution #94-15, approving Bingo Hall License Renewal Application.
9:10 PM 8. Administrator Comments
9: 15 PM 9. Council comments
9:30 PM 10. Adjourn
:.
The above times may vary depending upon length of issue discussion. .
"
.
. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
MEMJRl\NCllM
DATE : January 24, 1994
'10: Dorothy A. Person, City J'u'lmini strator
FRCM: Brian Fritsinger, CamIlnity P1ann:i.ng Coordina~
SUBJECl' : Pay Equity Report to Dept. of Ehp10yee Relations
Attached is the City of Arden Hills 1993 Pay Equity Irrplerrentation
report . This report is required by the Local G:lVemnent Pay Equity Act,
M,S. 471,991-471,999 and Minnesota Rules, Chapter 3920. You should note
that this report is due on January 31, 1994,
To be in canpliance, the report must pass several tests including
statistical analysis, These include giving mER carplete and accurate
inforrration, The analysis of salary ranges tlUlSt show that at least 80%
of the fetn3.le classes are not at a disadvantage in cc:nparison to rrale
classes.
. After mER has analyzed the City's irrplerrentation report, a written
notification will be sent explaining the canpliance decision. If the
City is not in canpliance, we will be given reccmrended actions to
achieve canpliance.
Cities not in canpliance will face a penalty of a 5 percent reduction in
State Aid or a $100.00 per day fine. Arden Hills is part of a regular
reporting cycle including 1/3 of all jurisdictions reporting in 1994.
This report is very similar to that canpleted in 1991 as only minor
changes have oc=ed, While the points have renained the same, the
number of job classes has been reduced and the Male/Fetn3.le class types
has changed. I w:Juld expect the plan to be in carpliance.
I w:Juld request that the City Council review the 1993 Pay Equity report
and authorize it's approval and subnittal to mER.
B:rk
.
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
. MEKlRANDllM
DATE: January 25, 1994
m: Dorothy Person, City .anm;-n; "trator
FRCM: Brian FritsiDger, ("",.".m;ty Planning Coord:inator~
SUBJECT : Sheehy Land Donation
I have followed up with Mr. Sheehy in regards to his interest in
donating land to the City, Mr. Sheehy confivned his intention was to
donate the land as a gift to the City. He also indicated he had no
e>q:ectations as to the City rraintaining the te.'1l1.is courts.
Staff will follow up with Mr, Filla to draft an agreerrent for the
transaction. Serre of the issues which need to l:e addressed in the
agreerrent include evidence of title and making sure all taxes are
=en.t.
As the weather irrproves, Cindy will l:e studying the coodition of the
tennis courts. Once she has had an opp:>rtunity to take a closer look,
. she e>q:ects to make any necessary reccmrendations,
I do not e>q:ect to have this agreerrent drafted for several weeks. I
will update you as staff progresses on this proj ect ,
BF:to
.
'- ....- ---
-- nc Tel
L..,.$ ~=qr 1 SUB U R BAN ARE A C HAM B E R 0 F COM MER C E
. .. I~ /. 2489 Rice Street. Rosevllle, Minnesota 55113.612/483.1313
January 21, 1994
Dear Loyal Chamber Member:
The Tenth Annual Scholarship/community Dinner, sponsored by
the Arden Hills/Shoreview/North Oaks/Mounds View Chapter is
scheduled for Friday, February 11, at the Shoreview Holiday
Inn. Proceeds of ticket sales for this event are directed to
scholarships for north suburban area high school students and
local community events. In the past nine years, the dinner
has provided more than $13,000 in financial support for
students and the communities.
While the event is designed to raise funds, the chapter also
awards more than $2,000 in cash prizes and door prizes
contributed by area companies. There is real excitement as
~ one lucky attendee will win $1,000 that evening.
Ticket prices are $125 each which includes the cost of dinner
and one of the fifty chances for cash and door prizes.
Additional dinners may be purchased for just $25. A chapter
representative will be contacting you for a door prize con-
tribution and to provide further information about tickets.
You may contact the Chapter Chair Nick Temali at 636-1910 or
the Chamber office for additional information.
The Holiday Inn will be serving your choice of Prime Rib or
Orange Roughy. Poolside cocktails will begin at 6:00 p.m.
with dinner following at 7:00 p.m.
.
j(-r 'rl.: ... '-
"
LAN D Q'LAKES 1 9 9 4 ANN U A L MEETING
ER
ERS
January 19, 1994
Mayor Thomas Sather
1450 West Highway 96
Arden Hills, MN 55112
Dear Mayor Sather:
Catch the excitement! Come and experience the "Power of Partners" at Land Q'Lakes 1994
Annual Meeting February 23 and 24 at the Minneapolis Convention Center.
. The .enclosed brochure describes all the electrifying events. There's something for everyone:
a dynamic keynote speaker, inspiring early bird seminars, three energizing mini sessions, and
high-voltage entertainment! The festivities also will include the 25th anniversary celebration for
Land Q'Lakes Young Producer program, The powerful partnerships welded together through
this program have had a lasting impact on Land Q'Lakes, young producers and the cooperative
system.
We hope you will be able to attend all, or at least part, of our 1994 Annual Meeting, If you
plan to attend, please complete the form with your name and address and return it to us, even
though you may not require hotel accommodations.
We look forward to seeing you in Minneapolis on February 23 and 24. If we can be of any
assistance, please call me at (612) 481-2506 or Dave Belina at (612) 481-2284.
Sincerely,
~,'~ i1ur f1JJ4O
Rita Page Reuss
Vice President, Public Affairs
.
PO. BOX I 1 6 M!NNEAPOLIS, M N 55440-0116
-------------------
e co clXteD-
-,-, r l 0 \JJtbu IT P-JAy
.-- .... . ,- \. .' ,~ "'5lLL ODl)---h~
----.,'- . o}'~. .. IS-?Q ~U,
.------
---- ...!IU I -rv $"'L- ~
OK- ~ Cu (.
.-.--- ..-E0t::f~OUt . LV LiU'J .1 G....
.~---- ._~:;o ~L~ i<.M)\~J~~Sl
.... \.v-Ccu"C.D <--.060. E .
~
-..- y\ .... - . ..lb' . [left
-- -- -~"'\~ .. Co l~ ... .
~ -
----~ =oJL..~p_~~~~.s6"~.
.. .--- LQrL (--m - L -=10 L't-K\
-. -.. .---.- u____.. ..-t- ..---. ... . .. .. .- .-- ..
. . S(LXfj) E. ~ --
_.,_.~-_.- --~--hJl)~~L) N
___.m.___
\~41 .E\Do
___'___n -.. Nu~ .k\\\( RECEIVED
JAN ;;: 8 IOOL!
--..,.-.... ,-.j,.) ,
[flY OF 4i!l;f" we s
----_..- I' . l~ 11 L
-.-- -
--
- -
{!.c
/~J0/-1'1
- -
@0)1l Independent School District No. 621
. tf~JJ Mounds View Public Schools
2959 North Hamllne Awnue. Sl Paul. Minnesota. 55113. Phone (612) 636-3650. Fax (612) 636-3653
Dr. Burton M. Nygren, Superintendent
School Board January 25, 1994
Harold Kurtz
CMir
David Stimpson
Vicil!' Chair
Lynda Thorland
Cur.
Mary Witucki Mayor Tom Sather
Tnasurer
Brian Amundsen City of Arden Hills
Director 1450 W. Highway 96
JoeUen Johnson Arden Hills, MN 55112
Director
Marre Jo Sager Dear Friends of the Mounds View School District:
Diril!'cJor
Your donation of $25,000 to be used for the tennis courts
at Mounds View High School has been received. It is
gratifying to note how generously schools are supported
in ways such as this.
- Thank you for making the Mounds View Public Schools a
high pri ority . Your efforts on behalf of #621 students
are most appreciated.
Sincerely,
hool Board
Harold Kurtz, Chair
HK: rs
--
- -
Serving the communities of Arden Huls . Moonds VIew. New Brighton. North Oaks . RosevlUe . Shore...ew . Vadnais Heights
Equal Opporhmity for Education and Employment
CITY OF ARDEN HILtS
e MEMJRl\NDllM
.
DA!'E : J~ 26, 1994
TO: Dorothy Person, City Administrator
FRCM: Dan Winkel, Public tbrks Superintendent "W.
SUBJECT: 1994 Pavement Management Issues
JVbst of the ccmrents or discussion I heard during the inforuational
rreeting centered around the fact that the streets scheduled for re-
construction did not last as long as they should have. Sane citizens
fran Bussard Court, Amble Drive, and Keithson Road are very concerned
that the streets have deteriorated llUlch quicker than anticipated, The
ccmrent was made that the streets should have had a life span of 20 to
30 years and not 10 to 15 years, The concerned residents fran these
streets are not necessarily opposed to the street being reconstructed,
however, they feel the City should pay for the entire costs due to the
fact the streets did not last as long as they should have.
As a general :ru.le, I did receive tw:J or three calls fran residents of
all of the streets scheduled to be reconstructed or recycled opposing
- any It.Drk on the streets. The opp:lSition appeared to be related to any
assessrrents that the residents ;o.a.lid have to pay.
m,to
--
- -
-- -------- ---------
e CITY OF 1lRDEN HILLS
MIMJR1lNOOM
Dl\TE: January 26, 1994
TO: Mayor, Council and staff
FRCM: Dorothy A. Person, city Administrator
~: TC1l1lP meetillq update
'Ihe meetings =ently being scheduled to rli<:nlSS 'ICAAP with public
input are rot:M confll:med to be:
'Ihursday, February 17 at 7:30 pm
'Ihursday, March 17 at 7: 30 pm
'Ihursday, April 21 at 7:30 pm
'Ihe meetin;Js will take place at the nain Administrative office. You
enter from Hwy. 10 across fram the Big 10 SUpper Club. 'lhere will be
directional signs, as well as, a guard on duty to assist with directions
to the Administrative office.
- Please forw.lrd this information to your Commitiee/("""mn,;c:sion members.
'!hank you.
DAP:rk
-
- -
.-
~ ,
CITY OF ARDEN BILLS
e MEXJRANDUM
D1lXE: January 26, 1994
TO: ~rothy P~~Tstrator
FRCM: Brian Frits'
SlJBJEl:T : Ryder Planning Case #93-15
As you recall, the Planning Carrnission deadlocked on their review of the
request to allem for the continuation of the bus te:tminal. The action
taken by the Carrnission of January 5 GalSisted of:
l. r::enial of request for rezoning (4-2),
2. Approve staff's recarrrendation to arrend the zoning ordinance
with several provisions and arrendment to the Canprehensive
Plan, MJtion failed with a tie vote (3-3).
The City Council, at the January 31, 1994 rreeting will be limited to
reviewing only Case #93-15 for a rezoning, ordinance arrendment = a
termination agreerrent through arrortization. At a minimum, it is
. recamended that the City Cbuncil consider a change to the land Use plan
as part of the Canprehensive Plan, Should the City (buncil approve any
of these options, the action should be directed back to the Planning
Carrnission for further discussion. In the case of a review for a
Special Use Pennit, the Carrnission will review this at its March 2
rreeting. This delay It-.<Jl1ld be due to the need to publish for a public
hearing,
One of the key issues which it is reccmnended the City (buncil GalSider
is the special provisions and definition of a bus terminal, The
definition as included in the report is:
H. Bus Terminal (special provisions)
. A bus te:tminal site must be located within three hundred (300)
feet of an existing sch=l.
. Any te:tminal located in Arden Hills must have a contract for
service with MJ1.ll1ds View Sch=l District #621.
. A bus terminal site must be located adjacent to l:oth an arterial
and collector road and have direct access to one of these roads.
Bus Terminal (proposed definition)
A bus terminal shall be defined as a building or space engaged in
the transportation of students within the l=al sch=l district,
--
- -
----------
. .
The property owner, RECD. has stated that the portion of the definition
e and special provisions which require the terminal to hold a contract
with the M:Junds View School District violates several laws and is not
reasonable,
The City Attorney, footr. Jer:ry Filla, recognizes that sale p::ltential legal
problems exist in the definition; hcw:lver, his rationale for including
this clause is sirrpleuThe bus tenninal is a non-oonforming use and has
not been in oonformance with the City Ordinance since its annexation to
Arden Hills. While the City Attorney has indicated that the City w:::>uld
be within its legal rights to enforce arrortization, there is benefit
provided to the taxpayers within our camn.mity of the tenninal' s arrrent
location, If the City were to rezone or arrend the zoning ordinance and
include the definition as proposed it provides a rrethod to ensure that
Arden Hills citizens w:::>uld continue to receive the benefit of this
location,
Our Attorney has stated this provision does not limit the property
owner/lessee fran contracting with other schcol districts, Mr. Filla
proposed this language for the sole putp:lS€ of benefiting the local
citizens and as an option to pursuing legal cpport.unities available to
the City through the arrortization process. In the case that the City
Council recanrended arrortization, the termination agreerrent could
contain language which w:::>uld allow the use to continue for a minimum
pericd of tirre or as long as the tenninal served the M:lunds view School
District.
. The Council should also note the new petition which was circulated since
the Planning O:mnission reviewed the case in early January. A list of
individuals who have signed the petition will be available at M:mdays
meeting.
BF:to
--
- -
, .
. CITY OF 1\RDEN HILLS
MEHJRl\NOOM
DATE: January 27, 1994
TO: Mayor and City Council
FRCM: Dorothy Person, city Mm:ini.strator
SUBJECT: 1994 Police services Review
As you recall, one of the 1994 goals set by the Council has been to
research and evaluate police and fire services. since that ti1ne, some
groundwork has been infonnally begun on review of police service. I
have briefly discussed the research with others who have been in sinri.lar
situations, such as with Falcon Heights, Roseville, League of Minnesota
Cities, Lino Lakes, and the South lake Minnetonka Group. I have
identified a few others such as Chanhassen and AIxlover who also contract
with their County Sheriff for services.
Also during this time, Arden Hills received publicity through the CORE
legislative report as being at 57% cost below the determined "basic
level of service".
. At question is whether the service =ently provided is meeting the
need, or whether the services need to be revised. This could include
but not be limited to whether to continue with the Ramsey County
Sheriff's contract, contract out certain services, work with another
city, or some other fom of provision of services.
The feedback received thus far includes:
.
- response ti1ne - is it as fast as expected and reasonable?
- Do local businesses receive information from the Dept?
- Is there preventative information given to J:oth
residents and businesses?
- Do business owners know when problems occur in their area?
- Are highest need issues addressed?
- Even if cost is low now, do residents get services they need?
- I don't know my "cop on the beat", Is the service
personalized enough?
- How are the police dealing with the "on .the street" issues?
- Do the police know our town, our citizens and business
issues?
.
. At this point, I ask for the Council's direction re: the desire for this
time spent on this review. If you wish to continue this information
gathering and evaluation, there are several approaches that Arden Hills
may wish to take in order to ascertain the public'S pri=ities and
needs . If you have preferences, please let me know at the January 31
Council meeting.
1. a mailed survey to Arden Hills residents.
2. Town meetings
3. Random phone survey
4. Refer to the Public Safety Corrnnittee
5. Es~lish a separate citizen' 5 Corrnnittee
6. No survey
7. staff review with a variety of cities reviewing personnel services,
what type of services are provided, hJdget, capital and space
needs, cost per capita
Your feedback and o:mnents would be appreciated. Please let me know if
. there is anything different to consider. In order to be timely for any
possible c:han:Je in 1995, this report should be ready f= the h.Jdget
season in June 1994. Work needs to l::egin asap.
-
.
.. ...
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
. MEMlRANDllM
TO: Mayor and eounci.1mellbers
FRCM: Dorothy A. PersCIl, City Administrator
DATE: J~ 28, 1994
stJBJEX::T : ;.rlm;n; strator Cannents f= 1-31-94 Co\mCil Meeting
** Closed Meeting - 6: 00 p:n - Update on Union Negotiations.
I. Public Hearing - Arden Place Update - The contractor was not able to
gain access to the property due to extrerre =ld .....eather. He is
anticipating to proceed with the project on JanuaIY 31. The M:Jnday
hearing could be =ntinued at this P='int.
II. Consent Calendar:
a. LMCIT offers additional Excess liability coverage of $1,000,000.
OUr current liability coverage is $1,600,000 as previously
approved. It is recrmrended that the City again awrove the
purchase of this additional coverage.
. b. Pay Equity Study - every third year the City is resp:msilile for an
updated review of job evaluations and its salaJ:Y scale, This is
about finalized and there have teen no job changes, with the
annual updates in the carpensation scale. It I'oDUld appear that
Arden Hills is in c:arpliance with pay equity, ~ver, the State
will advise us of their review at a later date, Further details
will l:e available to-bnday evening. The Council approval was given
previously in a Council rrotion, however, this formal resolution is
required by DCA.
c. Econcmic Developrent Cc:mnittee - an arrended Resolution is enclosed
noting an expansion fran 7 to 9 rrerrfr:ers. The individuals who are
interested in serving on this ccmni.ttee are reccmnended for
app:>intrrent later in the rreeting,
d, The Council's formal approval of the Flexible Benefit Program
(Section 125) needs to be noted by Resolution,
e, The Mechanical fee schedule resolution request is attached,
Earlier inforrration was sent indicating this change to percentage
of value of Tl'echanical work to l:e ccnpleted,
III. Unfinished and New Business:
a, See previous Planning Cc:mnission inforrration, as well as, an
updated rrerro attached.
b. Storm Water M3nagement appeal - At the worksession of JanuaIY 20,
1994, additional inforrration was presented by residents of the
townhares. If the Council would like additional inforrration prior
. to M:Jnday' s rreeting, please fee free to call staff.
c, 1994 Pavement M3nagement - Dan winkel has prepared a:mrents
--
-~-
,... .
pertaining to the feasibility study, as \Nell as, a review of the .
cat1l'el1ts received f=n residents who attended the Wonnational
rreeting.
d, The Council is being asked to receive the Feasibility Study and
order the public hearillg and Plans and Specs. Engineer Ten:y
Maurer is unable to be at the plarmed date for a public hearing on
February 28. He can send John Stewart or the hearing date can be
postponed until March 14, whichever the Council prefers.
e. Previously noted as the request to appoint two new Econanic
Ileveloprent llEmbers,
f. Premises Permit Renewal - Class A at Pot O'Gold for St. Mary's
Rcm3nian Orthodox Church, The review pr=ess has been ccxrpleted.
Staff recc:mrends approval of the application.
IV, Miscellaneous
Ccmnittee structure - If you have =rrrents on the draft of the Ccmnittee
structure, please feel free to let rre knew before the February 17
worksession, A reminder that the Carrnittee goals and mission staterrents
reccmrended, will also be addressed (in rough draft) at the February 17
worksession.
Personnel:
a, payroll - In order to provide a check and balance system, employee
insurance reports are being transferred to Renee. She will
prepare the insurance carpany rep:>rt and employee changes with a
request for payment to Jane, .
b. Brian will begin assisting in personnel areas new to Arden Hills,
such as wo:rking with CCtIIl1LIni.cations in the Flexible Spending
AcCOllIlt (Section 125), reviewing =rent employee insurances, etc,
TCAAP - One of the final dates for the public involverrent has had to be
changed due to =nflicts in scheduling. The new tillES and location of
the rreetings are noted on a trellO enclosed,
Finance:
a, Water purchase Carparison:
1992
$,99 per gallon x 369,940,710 = $336,450
1993
$1,21 per gallon x 320,934,280 = $389,000
The City purchased 13,3% fewer gallons in 1993 over 1992, yet the
=st per gallon increased 22.2% with the total cost of purchased
water increased by 6,2%.
b. 1994 budget rep:>rt is expected to be printed and final the first
\Neek of February, Copies will be sent to you as = as
available,
c, utility billings were nailed with a notice of new rates 1st
quarter.
d. Flexible spending deductions (Section 125) are in place in payroll
for 1994,
e, January County tax settlerrent shoNs we CMe the County $22,618.18, .
causing the total general fund loss expected to be approxirrately
$115,000.
.,
. Planning:
a. l\rroco - Brian rret with J\m:Jco to discuss sore expansion of their
business, They are in the process of acquiring the Great Lakes
restaurant location and are proposing to rerrodel it into an 8 bay
service station. They 'IO..Ild close the existing bays and the
existing station 'IO..Ild becc.ne a =wenience stove/gas station.
This is ~cted to go to the Planning Carrnission in April,
b. OJntrol Data - A prq:osal has been presented to staff to split
their property into 3 separate parcels. This case is ~cted to
go to the Planning Catrnission in March, The party interested in
acquiring about 4 acres for a machine shop is still interested.
Brain will visit their plant shortly to rreet them and discuss
possible TIF assistance,
c, February 2, 1994 Planning Carrnission packets are enclosed,
V. Attachments:
a, Letter fran resident Anne Finlay,
b. Letter fran 1M: regarding Ncminations for the 1994 C.C. lDdwig
Award.
c. Ramsey County board appointrrents for 1994.
d. Metro regarding Sheehy land donation,
e, Land 0' Lakes 1994 annual rreeting.
f, 1994 Independent Sch=l District #621 boaJ:d rreml:ers.
.
.
. PETITIONS (f3
Al!ainst Terminal:
Mr, & Mrs. Tix 1770 W County Rd F
J, Michael Duncan 3976 Glenview Avenue
Mr, & Mrs. John Stenglein 1785 W County Rd F
Mr. & Mrs. John Hollenhorst 1822 Venus Avenue
....... Mr. & Mrs. Rich Beardsley 1771 Janet Court
v Jim Borg 1812 Janel Court
v Mr, & Mrs. Steven Taylor 3905 Rolling Hills Rd
Derrek & Angela Hames 1839 Venus Avenue
Kim & William Dietrick 1785 Venus Avenue
Greg Fahey 1781 Janet Court
Ed Woo 3988 Glenview Avenue
Bernard Blascyk 4050 N Fairview
David Lyons 3908 Dellview Avenue
Beth & Brad Kimmer 1745 W County Rd F
Karen Albert 4090 Valentine Crest Rd
Laurence Amunson 1780 Glenview Avenue
Britt Lundgren 1777 Grarnsie Road
. Fernando Palomino 4100 Valentine Crest Rd
,/ Dorothy & Donald Zehm 4028 N Fairview Avenue
Terese Syvertsen 1761 Grarnsie Road
Kathryn M. Howell 3941 Rolling Hills Rd
Richard Aplikowski 1742 Gramsie Rd
John & Betty Eng 1746 Crystal Avenue
Janet Bishop 3947 Glenview Avenue
Genivieve Pearson 1637 Glenview Court
John & Evelyn Arneson 3931 Rolling Hills Road
Scott & Cami Gilsvik 1740 Venus Avenue
Joseph V odniek 1723 Glenview A venue
Chant Insixiengmay 4055 Valen1ine Avenue
Xavier Pereira 3956 Glenview A venue
Support Terminal:
Steve Floeder 1798 Venus Avenue
Gordon Fay Gramsie Road
Woman in South Arden Hills
One Anymous Arden Hills resident
.
. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
~
DATE: J~ 31, 1994
TO: Dorothy Person, City 1ldm:inistrat:=
FRCM: Dan Winkel, Public tbrks Superintendent
SUBJECT : Change on Resolution 94-13
Upon further review of the Feasibility Study the estimated 1994 Paverrent
Maintenance O:>sts should be $394,800 rather than $391,200 due to a
higher cost than earlier estimated of recycling on Keithson Road.
Resolution 94 -13 has been amended to reflect these changes. nus number
is an estimated total project.
r::w: to
.
.
.' CITY OF ARDEN HILLS PAGE 10F3
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CLAIMS REPORT
TO BE APPROVED 01/31/94 COUNCIL MEETING
. 1-/6-r'l
CLAIMS PAID SINCE LAST COUNCIL MEETING r--.
CK.# CK. DA1E VENDOR AMOUNT COMMENTS
6597 01110/94 MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY 160.00 SEMINAR, J. MOONEY &J. PERRON
6598 01110/94 LYNN L. BURWELL 501.00 DANCE INSTRUCTOR
6599 01/14/94 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RET. ASSN. 2.160.65 FIRST JANUARY PAYROLL
6600 01/14/94 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457 1.200.00 FIRST JANUARY PAYROLL
6601 01114/94 STA1E CAPITOL CREDIT UNION 2,267.56 FIRST JANUARY PAYROLL
6602 01/12/94 KINKO'S COPY CEN1ERS 74.69 NOTICES- SNOW REG. & UTILITI INFO
6603 01112/94 1ERRANCE R. POST 16.80 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
6604 01112/94 MSI INSURANCE 507.52 REFUND- OVERPAYMENT4Q93 UTILITI
6605 01112/94 MIDWEST BUSINESS PRODUCTS 163.70 VARIOUS OFFICE SUPPLIES
6606 01/12/94 PITNEY BOWES 93.19 ME1ER RENTAL. 01/16 - 04/15/94
6607 01112/94 PLAIS1ED COMPANIES 236.96 SAND- WA1ER BREAK ARDEN VIEW CT.
6608 01/12/94 POSTAGE BY PHONE SYS1EM 400.00 OFFICE POSTAGE
6609 01112/94 RAMSEY COUNTI 43,510.00 LAW ENFORCEMENT -JANUARY 1994
6610 01/12/94 ST. PAUL AGENCY, INC. 614.00 SURETI BOND - 1994
6611 01112/94 SCHUTIA'S HARDWARE, INC. 91.01 DECEMBER PURCHASES
6612 01112/94 SOUlli ST. PAUL S1EEL 291.00 REPAIR GOALPOSTS
6613 01112/94 VAN 0 LI1E, INC. 12.37 #16 - BULB
6614 01112/94 WALDOCH SPORTS 217.58 #8 - SOLENOID KIT
6615 01112/94 COVERALL CLEANING 137.39 SERVICE -JANUARY, 1994
6616 01/13/94 BEISSWENGER'S HARDWARE 58.35 DECEMBER PURCHASES
6617 01/13/94 BOYER FORD TRUCKS, INC. 31.68 #9 - WIPER BLADE
6618 01/13/94 FRA TIALLONE'S HARDWARE STORES 208.05 DECEMBER PURCHASES - W/DISCOUNT
6619 01113/94 KA lli AUTO SUPPLY 129.36 DECEMBER PURCHASES
. 6620 01/13/94 ST. JOSEPH'S EQUIPMENT, INC. 51.25 #20 - LIGHT ASSEMBLY
6621 01/13/94 USWEST COMMUNICATIONS 1.011.65 DECEMBER CHARGES
6622 01/14/94 DAVID W. KRIESEL, TNC. 3.425.00 INSPECIlONS.12/18/93 - 01/14/94
6623 01/14/94 AT&T 22.86 RINK 1ELEPHONES
6624 01/14/94 ATRSIGNAL,INC. 30.15 BEEPER RENT - JANUARY
6625 01/14/94 GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD 17.09 SERVICE. DECEMBER 1993
6626 01114/94 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL,INC. 18.00 SERVICE. DECEMBER 1993
6627 01/14/94 LAWSON PRODUCTS, TNC. 264.08 SHOP SUPPLIES - WIDISCOUNT
6628 01114/94 FRANK MADDEN & ASSOCIA1ES 70.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, 12193
6629 01/14/94 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORPORATION 30.67 W A 1ER BREAK MA 1ERIALS, 12/93
6630 01114/94 STAR TRIBUNE 78.00 SUBSCRIPTION, lliROUGH 01103/95
6631 01/14/94 NORlliERN STATES POWER 4,096.65 TNVOICES DUE 01125/94
6632 01/14/94 DCA, TNC. - FSA DEPARTMENT 115.38 DEPENDENT DAY CARE, lliRU 01107/94
6633 01/20/94 UNTVERSITI OF MINNESOTA 60.00 MUNICI-PALS WIN1ER WORKSHOP - 2
6634 01/20/94 SUB. AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 20.00 MEETING 01128. DOROlliY P. & BRIAN F.
6635 01/20/94 MINNESOTA DEPT. OF REVENUE 4,035.00 SALES TAX - 4Q93
6636 01128/94 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RET. ASSN. 2,195.39 SECOND JANUARY PAYROLL
6637 01128/94 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST - 457 1.281.60 SECOND JANUARY PAYROLL
6638 01/28/94 STA1E CAPTTOLCREDITUNION 2,267.56 SECOND JANUARY PAYROLL
6639 01/28/94 INTL UNION OF OPERATING ENG. 163.00 JANUARY PAYROLLS
6340 01128/94 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RET. ASSN. 72.00 JANUARY P/R - INSURANCE
6341 01128/94 UNT1ED WAY OF ST. PAUL 96.00 JANUARY PAYROLLS
6642 01128/94 MCDONALD'S 16.60 VACATION DAY TRIP
6643 01/28/94 KNOTTS CAMP SNOOPY 125.00 VACATION DAY TRIP
6644 01/28/94 GOLF MOUNTAIN 30.00 VACATION DAY TRIP
72,675.79
. ADD UNPAID (Tl- T59), PAGE 3 OF 3 - 209,720.25
TOTAL ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CLAIMS
FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL, 01/31/94 282,396.04
N01Ee ACCOUNTS PAYABLE MANUAL CHECKS lliROUGH #6596
WERE APPROVED ATlliE 01/10/94 COUNCIL MEETING.
PAGE 2 OF 3
.
28 Jan 1994 Unpaid Summary Check Register
Fi-i 4: 29 PM CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
tlck
Number Date Vendor Amount
------------------------------------------------------------------------
T00001 00455 ANDERBERG-LUND PRINTING CO. 3,071.46
T00002 00496 ANDY'S PORTABLES 245.20
T00003 00123 ASSOC. OF METROPOLITAN 2,531.00
T00004 00001 BELL, FRED 26.00
T00005 00136 BERRY BEARING COMPANY 41. 56
T00006 00494 BRC - ELECTIONS 2,080.00
T00007 00504 CAREER TRACK SEMINARS 49.00
T00008 00153 CELLULAR ONE 15.80
T00009 00319 CITY OF ROSEVILLE 92,510.34
T00010 00197 D.C, HEY 218.26
T00011 00165 DANA COMMERCIAL CREDIT 328.84
T00012 00166 DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT CO. 144.00
T00013 06121 DIANNE WOLF 15.00
T00014 00490 EDAM 215.00
T00015 00475 FOCUS NEWS 80.00
T00016 00003 FULLER, KEVIN 26,00
T00017 00180 GALLAGHER'S SERVICE, INC, 181.50
T00018 00183 GENERAL REPAIR SERVICE 3,587.14
T00019 00187 GOPHER SIGN COMPANY 57.77
T00020 00202 HYDRO SUPPLY COMPANY 1,411.98
1021 00489 INDEPENDENT SCH DISTRICT 621 858.40
022 00178 INT'L CONF. BLDG OFFICIALS 75.00
0023 00216 LABOR RELATIONS ASSOCIATES,INC 85.00
T00024 00222 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 22.80
T00025 00225 LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS 106.43
T00026 00505 LOFTNESS, INC. 306.02
T00027 00235 MAIER STEWART & ASSOC., INC. 3,722.36
T00028 00237 MCDONALD BATTERY COMPANY 268.27
T00029 00007 MCKINNEY, MICHAEL 26.00
T00030 00240 METRO AREA MGMT ASSOCIATION 37,00
T00031 00242 METRO WASTE CONTROL COMM, 45.628.00
T00032 00248 MIDWEST BUSINESS PRODUCTS 208,70
T00033 00266 MINN. REC. & PARK ASSOCIATION 240.00
T00034 00261 MINNESOTA GFOA 15.00
T00035 00262 MINNESOTA MAYORS ASSOCIATION 20.00
T00036 00263 MINNESOTA MUTUAL LIFE 316.89
T00037 00503 MN DEPT. OF EMPLOYEE RELATIONS 20.00
T00038 00506 MN PARKS SUPERVISORS' ASSN. 20.00
T00039 00008 MOONEY, JOSEPH 26.00
T00040 00497 NATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION 10.00
T00041 00286 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY 493,63
T00042 00287 NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY 1,043.27
T00043 06122 NSII PLUMBING, INC. 30.00
T00044 00009 PERRON, JAMES 26.00
T00045 00173 PETERSON,FRAM & BERGMAN P.A. 3,506.00
T00046 00310 RAMSEY CO.LEAGUE LOCAL GOV'T 540.20
1047 00308 RAMSEY COUNTY 44,220,03
048 00012 REED, FRED 26.00
0049 00333 SANDERS,WACKER,WEHRMAN,BERGLY 90.00
T00050 00013 SAXE, STEPHEN 26.00
T00051 00014 SCHIFSKY, MICHAEL 26.00
T00052 00340 SEReO LABORATORIES 309.00
T00053 00344 SHUTTLEPRINT 42,49
T00054 00352 TARGET STORES 42.02
PAGE 3 OF 3
.
28 Jan 1994 Unpaid Summary Check Register
Fti 4,29 PM CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
aCk
Number Date Vendor Amount
------------------------------------------------------------------------
T00055 00361 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 67.00
T00056 00451 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 35.00
T00057 00192 W.W. GRAINGER, INC. 256.60
T00058 00019 WINKEL, DAVID 26.00
T00059 00378 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 67.29
Grand Total 209720.25
.
'.
.
.
(I) (I)
Ul ~ ~ ill
Ul 3: 0 'U
(I) Z (I) c: c: Z z 1i5 z (I) z Z Z 'U Z '<t 0: Z
.... Q) ~ ~ 0 1i5 ~ Z Z 0: C\I
'U Q) ~ '5l Q) Q) Q) CD g Q) CD 'U CD Q) (I) (I) ~ c: Q)
~ ~ ~ .... ~ ~ 0: ~ :> ;>. ~ ~ ~
'U c: .... .... c: Q) 3: (I) 'U 0
< c: c: Cf) .... ~ ~ <( <D C 0: (I) .c
g 0 'X 'X c: Cf) 0 CD Ol :>
c: g c: c: 15- c: z q. en c: z j c: c: iii ::l >< c: c: 'c .g c:
0 (I) CD ~ ~ 0 ::l .~ g 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0
'5l c: -.J -.J g Q) c: .... '5l '5l 0 U l1.. q. q. .... ....
Q) .~ c: 'x .c Cl Q) I :;: CD W Cl
c: c: .c .c c: c: ::l C .c c: .3 a5 C C 'U C C .c 1il ~ C c: (I) :;: c:
'x Cf) -.J t:: t:: 'x 'x 0 'x t:: c: Q) I'- ID 'x C C 'x 'x Q Q) '~ 'x .... 'x
Q) 0 0 Q) Q) Q) 0 0 C C .3 0 ::l Q) Q) 3: .... CD I- (I) .3
-.J Z Z Z Z -.J -.J Z -.J Z U Z Cf) I Cf) a 0 -.J -.J I " -.J -.J Q) Z
(f) ~ CD (') (') (') (') ~ Ol 0 0 (Xl ~ 0 8 (') ~ <D 0: ~ [ry I'- 0 ~ 8 (') (') c: l{) ~
r- ~ (') l"- I"- I'- <D <D l{) C\I ~ ~ 0 '<t I'- 0 Ol C\I 0 I"- <D 0:: '<t l{)
l{) C\I (Xl <D <D <D 0 I"- C\I I'- <D I'- <D I'- 0 l{) I'- '<t '<t l{) I"- Ol C\I (') <D I"- C\I l{)
~ (') (') (') (') (') (') '<t (') '<t (') (') (') (') ~ (') (') (') '<t (') (') '<t ~ ~ ~ (') (') (Xl (') (')
II:
W
a..
(f)
(f)
. w
z
(f)
:::J
[]J
-=t .
0)
0) <(I 0
..... a
~I () .... 0
C I CD U C\I
;>.() 0' 0 I ..c 0
.... UJ u ~I Cl C 0
() E c: Q) ~ UJ 0 <D
<ll E <ll ~ g .... () '(jj C\J
.... C CD c:
Ei tll ::l C E UJ CD C:. -.J C UJ '<t
tlll Cf)lo- 'E ~
<Ui Q) <ll UJ :2.... - Q) '00 0 Q) &10...11;3 UJ
Q) .... ~1'8' 'E Q) .... Q)
E .c' .... Ul UJ , Q) U tll Q) iii c: UJ c: Q)
(La Q) Q) I_+"'" CD U c: <ll ....
<ll c:O: .... I 0 C a. 01- UJ :> c: ::l :E () :i: <ll .... 0
tll Q) (L ~.~ 0 1a g () () .... ~'U CT C Q) ....
Z 'U Q) o >< .... Cf)
[;j () c:~ .c +:: C Cf) .... cOw c: () .9- I- .c
- 0 'U UJI lii 'U Cf) cl.c UJ <( 1il 0- 0 ::l 0 :; ....
(L Q) ~3: C '-Iw 0 .... () <ll UJ CD Q) Q) 0 c: ::l .... C <ll .... ;>. a ::l
tll C 0 a. ~IQ) (L -?- :;: ......" UJ o CT Q) 0 -g I- U 'U -.J I
c:W l1.. <ll c:c...." 0 ~ :.:::J c:.:::J .... .... c: Q) .c ~
Q) Q) Q) c: <ll <ll I- 1:1..... 'U CD .c 10 0 c: Q).c E 0 m C UJ <ll
'U ::l nj. >1........ Q) x Q) '- 'U Q) t:: .c <ll .... .c Cl .~ (I) C ~ 'c N
::l .- Q) <ll UJ '(i'j C tll 0 ::l (5 .cS <ll N
'- - _.c uo~f:. Z <ll () (J oc '- Q) 'c
<(W COia I -.J -.J ::J Z Z Z(L Cf) Cf)Cf) Cf)CO 0: I- " ~ I- 0::
UlI I
.... '-
.- Q)
E..c ~ C\I (')1{5 l{) <D I'- CD Ol 0 ~ C\I (') '<t l{) <D I'- CD Ol 0 ~ C\I ~ ~ l{) <D I'- CD Ol
CD E 0 0 o. 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C\I C\J C\I C\I C\I C\I C\I C\I
(L ::l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
Z '<t '<t '<t'<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t
Ol Ol 0l0l Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol
.
.
Q) Q)
:l :l
C cry "C W W - C W
Q) "C - 0 Q) cr: Q) Ul Q) Z
~ cr: w w Ul ~ ~ W W "C ~ "C Ql -g ~ ~ "C
Ql W Ql > (1l Q) - (1l Ql Q)
C x "C "C ~Iz z 'll:: z C ~ Z Ql "C "C CO 0 :l > 0 Z C Ul 0 > :l
"C C C .;:: ~ -;::
0 0 cr: cr: Ql 0 (1l > cr: cr: ~ cr: cr: u. 0 cr: C
U. Ql cr: a> ...J Q) <( eO "C a> 0 a> g. "C 0 a>
OJ ~ ~ Wa> ~ > ~ 'Q1 ~ ~ ~ C eO >- ~ ~ ~ "C 'Q1 eO >- ~
C ~ Q) "CI~ .;:: a> "C "C C C 0 C ~ Ul eO 0 <0 C Ul
C 0 ~ C C C C C "C C C "C
.~ cr: 0 "C eO cr: 0 C cr: 0)
~ :l :l ~ .~ c;J a> C eO C .~ :l C ~ cr: :l :l ..c: -~ :l ';:: "C 0 :l C cr: 'X :l ~ :l 0 C
G 0 0 0 Ql ...J 0 0 I~ X 0 0 X 0 0 0 0 I~ ~ X 0 0 ~
...J 0 0 Qi OJ eO 'Q1 ...J cr: 0 C X 0 0 0 ...J 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 0 u ~
oI:l o +-'.~ "C "C U. 'x 0 J U. a> ~ u. ~
..c: - - C Q) 5 E C 0 C C ..c: - C a> u. 13 t) a> ..c: - a> ..c: - C C ..c: ..c: ..c: - ..c: C
t:: C Ul Ul C 'x :l .~ t:: Ul .~ "C t:: "C Ul C t:: Ul 'x :l t:: t:: "C Ul t:: 'x
0 0 ~ Q) 0 ~ 0 eO 0 0 a> ...J ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 0 0 :g ~ 0
3: Ql 3: 0 3: Q) "C 3: eO a> f- a> a> a> ~
Z OJ 0 f-OI ...J cr: ...J Z ...J cr: Z Ql ...J Z cr: a> u. Z ...J U Z Z cr: I Z
cry C 0 cry ie '~Io 8 cry <Xl ~ I'- 0) 0 cry L{) ~ cr: cry 8 0 I'- 0 cry C ~ 0 0 L{) 8 cry 8 L{) 8 0 0 cry
I'- 'x <0 ~ I'- ~ cry 0) <Xl <0 I'- 0 <Xl I'- C\I L{) eo cry a:: L{) C\I eo L{) C\I eo cry L{)
eo ~ ~ cry I'- a.. 0) ~ eo <Xl v I'- V V I'- C\I C\I ~ C\I cry C\I I'- C\I C\I C\I m ~ <Xl cry L{) <Xl ~ I'- C\I 0) L{)
cry ~ ~ cry v~v cry ~ v C') C') v C') ~ v ~ ~ ~ C') C') ~ ~ C\I V C') ~ C') ~ C') C') ~ ~ ~ C') C')
.
Ul
Q)
'f: C
Q) I 0
0. fd 0
0 1 'E 'c
~ ..c:
a.. 0 0 0
Ul a> g - ~
:l >- :J >01 en
t:: C <( ~ a>
Q) a> eO ..c: c:!-
~ '(jj 0 0 a> 0 Ul U eOl==
..Q .lB a> 'E, C 0 C C o Q: C C .t:: 'Q.II
0 - C .-1 0 eO (5 C
Ul cr: C C Q)I 0 eO ~Io ~ ~ C ~18155
a> a> 0 Ul >. ~ f- Ul Ul ~ :l
..Q I E 0 ~ U! - E E 0 Ul (/.)1- - Ul ~ "C "C Q).o "C
ts Q) <(I '13 0 Q) Ql CD o a> oI:ll~ (/.) C Q) C (ij ..c:' ~
Ul t:: t) ~ 1 1ii 0 - o E - eO si eO <(
t:: :3, eO ~, C Ql ~ - "C ~ C ~
a> 9 O! Ul 0 ~ C 00 C Q) Ul Q) ...JI.~ I C
Q) E ~ Ul ~
0 01 0 a> EI Q),O eO 0 "C E
..Q <( 0 <( '(jj .:.:: (/.) (/.) ~I~ a> Ul E 10. 0
eO Q) ""01"- "C ~ en (f).r:.'-
0 0 co Q) eO '5 ii5 0 eO ~ <(c ~ 0 "CeO Q) eO W E:O.:t= ~
Ul "C ~ 0 Si~ - "C Q) C <( 0 C Ou. 0
cr: Ul ~ eO C Q) is Ig 1ii 0 Ul eO UlIQl eO 0 eO Q) O'l__ eO a>
"C > .~ "C 0 (1l eO a.. 0 ~.~ :2 <( ..c: 0 ~ (j) III ='0 0 ~ o C ~ !E _Ul .- OJ 'iiill5 ~ g
C eO G a.. '0 0 0 1>: .- C co :l 'tijeO C 0 al"C
eO "C 0 C oo 0 ~ eO ~ 0 I'g 0 ~ IeO oo eO (j) ~ I", X
~ eO eO :l ~ a> "" t:: :l a..1.g E';::
oo eO:2 0 0 a> a> ~G 0 1il eO X ~ C..Q c- C CD C C ..c: m ~W
"C 0 - C '0 :l eO ..c: ~ :l C IT: a> Q) oo Q).!!l eO 8JQ) :2 Q) 0 ~(
~ cl . '0 C C ~ Qi ~~ a.. 1ii :l 0 ..c: 'EI ~ "COO a.. CfJ u. ~ "C ~ eOt:: t::"C 0.:
eO o ~ 0 :l ~ eO - Q" (1l a> 0 :2 eO ~ Q) -=1.E 0 Q) ~ eO ..c:O o c So..... crs
0 0:2 :2 a.. I 0 0 CfJ 0 <( a.. 0 0 cry u::: <(Ia.. <(cr: ii5 :2 <(<( f- a.. <( 0 a..,z Z <( G,I
I Jeo I
0 ~ C\l1C') (il.i L{) <0 I'- <Xl 0) 0 ~ C\I C') ~ L{) eo I'- <Xl m 0 ~ C\l C') :;Ii I'- <Xl 0) 0 ~ C\I C') $ L{)leo
C') C') C')'C') C') C') cry C') cry V V V V V V V V V L{) L{) L{) L{) L{)IL{) L{) L{) L{) eo <0 eo eo eo <0
I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 III
V V vv V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V v 0'i1O'i v v V V V V V v ~I~
m m mm 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) m 0) m m 0) 0) m 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) m m m m mm
.
f
. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 94-10
RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING
AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Arden Hills has determined
that the preservation of its tax base, creation of jobs and general
welfare of its citizens is in its best interest; and
WHEREAS, the City has the ability from time to time to create
Committees which shall report to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the City has considered the recommendations from the
Economic Development Task Force
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ARDEN HILLS,
l. An Economic Development Committee is hereby established
in and for the City, The mission of this Committee shall
be to represent the community, assist local business, and
. to advise the City Council. This would be accomplished
through:
* Working to provide a favorable climate for
development and redevelopment,
* Retention and expansion of existing businesses,
* Attraction of new business activities.
2 . The Economic Development Committee will be governed by a
board of nine ( 9) members appointed by the City Council,
The Committee will be staffed by the Community Planning
Coordinator and one (1) Council liaison.
3. The Economic Development Committee be appointed under
staggered terms of 1, 2, and 3 years.
ADOPTED BY THE ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL THIS 31ST DAY OF JANUARY,
1994.
THOMAS R, SATHER, MAYOR
ATTEST:
.
DOROTHY A. PERSON, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
. RESOLUTION NO. 94 -11
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A PRETAX HEALTH CARE AND DAYCARE
EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT PLAN AND ADMINISTRATIVE
SERVICES CONTRACT WITH DCA, INC.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Arden Hills considered
a proposal to provide a Flexible Benefits Program to
the City's employees thus providing the City and
employees with certain tax advantages; and
WHEREAS, the City Council approved adoption of this Flexible
Benefits Program and approved entering into an
Administrative Agreement with DCA, Inc, at its
November 8, 1993 City Council Meeting; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Arden Hills, Minnesota that the City is authorized to make
such contributions from the funds of the City as are necessary
to carry out the provisions of said plan at any time, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED in the event any conflict arises between
the provisions of said plan and the Employees Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) or any other applicable law or
regulation (as such law or regulation may be interpreted or
. amended) , the employer shall resolve such conflict in a manner
which complies with ERISA or such law or regulation.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN
HILLS THIS 31ST DAY OF JANUARY, 1994.
THOMAS R. SATHER, MAYOR
ATTEST:
DOROTHY A. PERSON, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
.
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
. RESOLUTION NO. 94-12
RESOLUTION REVISING THE MECHANICAL FEE SCHEDULE.
WHEREAS, Section 6-88 of the Arden Hills Code provides that
permit fees shall be established from time to time by
resolution adopted by the City Council, and;
WHEREAS, after careful consideration and review it has been
recommended that changes be made in the present
commercial mechanical fee schedule.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that commencing March 1, 1994 the
following changes be made to the mechanical fee schedule:
Commercial. Industrial and Instructional Mechanical fees.
This fee shall be $50.00 plus one and one-quarter percent
(1,,%) of the total valuation of installation, including
labor and material, and cost of equipment (value of work
must include the cost of installations, alterations,
additions or repairs, including all labor and materials
supplied by the contractor,) In addition, it shall include
all material supplied by the contractor.
State surcharge is paid at rate of ,50 for each $1,000 of
. valuation of mechanical work.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN
HILLS THIS 31ST DAY OF JANUARY, 1994.
THOMAS R. SATHER, MAYOR
ATTEST:
DOROTHY A, PERSON, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
.
- --------- --------------
\ l UL,f-- 1v"'"'~1 w~'l:jl:t.'N"';;~"n~~J/j7>>i~Ul'l; CASE 1194-07
~ 1 1-" . :::~~ E.~:-.'" ., i~~: Y.>[~illJtl- ; ARDEN MANOR
i ~I-+'\' - ~... F -1 :J ~::}::!r~ i r331:W:~~', \\~JIJ i AMEND SPECIAL USE
! ~ .,1.. ~'~r'l~ R~f:r'~' i~ PERMIT
I "1- ," - "l-:~ ~ ;;.>.~
Ui \~. .' ~'I~ ,,;:~~::~, Eii.: "', 'Urf,l
, " i~"l..l.-I.l I .....,.
e. ='l ~/.~. .~):- .
. u~~~~ ~I~ "~'"
_~ '" ,. ':/' VJ.
~==~. , .. '------
~, .... /" 'I' ______
: . I r
/ : -'."; f:\ I . c..; CASE 1194-08
_ ........ . " ~.r::'" _ __ : SPECIAL USE
Lj"--/I 7 W. rm:o-- ~. r'l-.~" . =1....1=]r~1-n_- PERMIT
: d!Q; " lTFJ"l IiI / ". \, ...... "< VTf'f . wJ,J. =
J} ~ \ '\ = ~~~~) 'f;;-.~':'~., ; \.1 ~~~=..'5;1 -
'/ ~\ \ \ (.:l <J-.J Q", X '0':". . \( ).'<- L
: j t ~ I'.L:. ''&11r',",: ;,
:[' '... R-1 ~~ t,i.. B 1 W :..... _I
. -:'\.- oj ......" '1\\ .. -.0 ./ I
. \ I . ......"'1 " ea.uCl( eo . e..
.- . - ~ It... . -0.
:', '\ llli1iill8J;EffiJ f0; ,.' " "'1\...1. ~ r-/ S...... :
. ~ "..' 11 ~ . -.(
: \. \ -'-Ir "",~,\1~ ..' "., ",jI -$' ",,:
: of " " '1;<- \'
: -/y== L~....... .1." /. U'{ l:
:... ~ ,,~~P-.. -."",1. '~, b
. .... I \""', ",_,~,~, .- ..::<:J='=,,'::i>' ~~
: Q."'"d:. \' __ __1. "''10./ -'I" __
r'j, i~ : ~ :~ /_ l~':::"" I-FbE' _ CASE 1194-09
: p. 0 -. (,~_' '- . _ CONTROL DATA
: R::::; . ' , ", - , , AMEND SPECIAL
r-;: W:t::.\,.- <.j, liJ ~ ~ -
--,' rt"". . '~I~b ....,
TU'/ ,; I- ..J ..t:'''''1 ~ .. ~ :::t I~
........-11 I!\ p:"'" I ~d I~~i' ~ L.J .{( .- CASE 1194-05
I _ ,;,~, '\'-" r ~ fj II ..,u.::! B-2 !!:== THEODORE BRAUSE
.' ..' --J"R . 1/ j ..u C SPECIAL USE
d.:"".;;: ~ .' tW'"M!lJl n J( ICB.:~: PER11IT
- 'G-;-!, ~ ~~~gr l)~~'
,..,. _' lW . \ ..' .,.: "~! ...:.j #~
=YL I '" :' ..' 'w I ~ ~JL
. . ,.'!.,. \ (tV..:ll!.
'- ... -: . t"'" ii'ru,;
-~~ \ r2 R-1 'jI!~!tlIT-I~
I R-A3!-?1' ~~li~< ~_ J-...L 111;/ IIUIL I J:\l3~~.-.:
~: i'~ .J'''' ..~.fo!tc~ ..
. '.;! ~ 'f.... "-'"\, t -:~;;-
rrrTTTTQ' J ""'".,... . ., 1; / L, . I'!!ffIrQ,
"'.M ==.. -,.".'" ~_. . H""'"
! {ri IlIIIIm!ffi -:;L ~ "J'%']IIl1Tfi1'r.:.) .... :.,]1 -I' .
~nr 1 II j \ -11'fl l !tIJ,lJttjd':/ ...,.~ nTI '
, u_lc;:- ~0.Cl\; .-.....--:-.... !iI.\,
l _n._. B-2/ . FY'7'~, ij
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
. MAY 4. 1994
. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
MEH:lRANDUM
DA!'E : April 28, 1994
TO: Arden Hills Planning Ccmnission
FRCM: Brian FritsiDger, Camunity Planning Coordinato~
SUBJECl': Case #94-07, Amended SUP #75-6
Applicant: Arden Manor Mobile Hare Park
RmUEST
The applicant is requesting an amendment to Special Use Permit #75-6
for approval to close the swirrming p:ol at the Arden Manor l'<bbile Hare
Park.
BACKGROUND
Special Use Permit #75-6 was amended in 1977 to allow the Permittee to
. offer the remaining 105 lots for occupancy subject to several
improverrents . These improverrents included the ball diannnd, fencing,
installation of swirrming pool, scdding and landscaping,
The applicant states there are several reasons for closing the
swirrrning pool; llDst of which are related to the continued maintenance
of the pool.
- The poor condition of the p:ol surfaces
- leakage
- minimal use by the residents
The applicant is prop::lsing to fill in the p:ol and plant a shrub and
garden area,
FINDINGS
1. Zenina
There are no requirerrents within the Zoning Ordinance which
would require the mobile !Jane park to maintain a swiI1111ing p:ol.
.
. Case #94-07 Page 2 4-28-94
2. Miscellaneous
Staff can find no specific reference to the swirrrning pcol in the
case file or City Council, Planning Ccmnission, and Parks
Ccmnittee minutes which may assist with this request. In
reviewing amended SUP #75-6, it may l:e construed that the
swirrrning pcol was an amenity required by the City in order for
=nstruction of additional lots.
The Planning Ccmnission has not l:een appointed with the
responsibility of enforcing and/or negotiating the Park
dedication fees or Code of Ordinances. These duties are the
resp::msibility of the City Council and Parks Comnittee,
Chapter 14 of the Cede of Ordinances addresses l1'Obile homes in
Arden Hills. There are no requirements within this chapter of
the Ordinance which require the rrobile home park to specifically
maintain a swirrrning pcol.
. However, Section 14-59 does address recreational areas, It
states that "all l1'Obile home courts shall have one or l1'Ore
recreational areas which shall J:e easily accessible to all =urt
residents ... All equipment installed in such an area shall l:e
owned and maintained by the owner or operator at his own
expense. 11
The swimning pcol was not required as part of the park
dedication ordinance. Because the swimning pcol was not part of
the park dedication, staff l:elieves that Section 14-59 would not
apply in this case.
At the April 21, 1975 City Council m=eting, reference was made
that under the Park [;edication Ordinance, 6 acres were required,
The Park easement was approved as 3-1/2 acres and the developer
was to install all equipment according to village
specifications, There was no reference to the swirrrning pcol,
At the July 12, 1976 City Council meeting, representatives of
the l1'Obile home park approached the Council and arrong other
. issues raised a concern aJ:out the swirrrning pcol, The Council
--- ---.-
. Case No, 94-07 Page 3 4-26-94
responded that residents of the park have the right to expect
the amenities, such as the p::ol, which were part of the approved
plan for the park,
Staff has received several phone calls fran residents who have
indicated that they use the pool and do not want to see it
closed, No information is available as to the number of
residents which use the pool regularly,
OPITClNS
l. /obve to approve the request fran Arden Manor to amend SUP #75-6
and delete Section III,D,3 to allow the park to close the
swinming p::ol and fill it in to plant a shrub and flower garden,
2. /obve to approve the request fran Arden Manor to Amend SUP #75-6
and delete Section III,D,3 to allow the park to close the
. swirrming pool, This app:roval is subj ect to the applicant
providing similar or equivalent arrenities as it relates to park
dedication (Le., additional land, cash in lieu, new park
facilities, maintenance responsibilities, etc.), and the Parks
Carrnittee and City Conncil approving these equivalent amenities.
3, /obve to deny the request from Arden Manor to close the swirrming
pool,
4, Table the request pending additional information fran staff,
REC.'CMoIENDATICIN
Based on the information available, staff WJuld reccmnend that the
Planning Corrrnission llDve to approve the request from Arden Manor to
Amend SUP #75-6 and delete Section III,D,3 to allow the park to close
the swinming p::ol. This approval is subject to the applicant
providing similar or equivalent amenities as it relates to park
dedication (Le., additional land, cash in lieu, new park facilities,
maintenance responsibilities, etc.), and the Parks Carmittee and City
Council approving these equivalent arrenities,
. /dmj
--------------- ----
ARDEN MANOR
. 4605 PRIOR AVENUE - ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA (612) 636-0553
April 4, 1994
Brian Fritsinger
City of Arden Hills
1450 West Highway 96
Arden Hills, Mn. 55112
Re: Change in Special Use Permit
Dear Mr. Fritsinger,
Please find enclosed the information you requested for the
Planning Commission and City Council to review at their next
meeting.
The reasons we would like to close the Swimming Pool is because
of very poor condition of the pool surfaces, the water leaking
out and the very few residents that use the pool, which does not
justify the expense of keeping the pool open.
Last year the ground outside the pool was saturated with water
. from the cracks in the pool that appears to be coming from the
plastered area of a skimmer. This winters frost has continued to
deteriorate the tile around pool.
While the pool was used quite regularly by only five to six
children, the pool basically got very little use. Several times
last summer when the weather got extremely hot and we had adults
and children combined in pool. Each of these hot days, someone
defecated in the pool and we had to close the pool to clean and
Superchlorinate the pool before we could reopen.
What we WOuld like to do with the pool after we close it, is to
fill in the pool with dirt, remove wooden fence and plant a
shrub and flower garden with the pool apron serving as a patio
area. This would be a positive addition to the appearance of
the Park and office building.
Thank you for your input and consideration !
Sincerely,
e-. -.--) ~. <
-, . //;;/ . ,;c~~
Thomas E. Holmquist .
Arden Manor Park Manager
.
J_ .
J./ .
11_ '). ~ - 7'7
. ST ATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
SECOND AMENDMENT TO
AMENDED SPECIAL USE PERMIT--CASE NO. 75-6
Tho undersigned, the Clerk-Administrator of the City
of Arden H I I Is, acting pursuant to action taken by the Arden
Hills City Council at Its meeting on November 14, 1977, does
hE> re b y amend the Amended Spec I a I Use Permit with respect to
Arden Manor (Case No. 75-6 ) In the following rpspects:
I. Amendment to Section III. D. Subsection D. of
said Amended Special Use Permit I s herebyamended'ln I ts en-
. tlrety to read as follows:
nO. Effective November 14, 1977, Permltee
sha I I be a II owe d to oHe r the remaining
105 lots for occupancy subJect, however,
to the following Ite,"s of Improvements be-
Ing completed and Inspected and app rove d
by the proper city officials no I ate r th an
June 30, 197B:
I. The Installation of hasos and
benches and minor leveling of
In fie I d 1 n ba II park;
2 . Installation of fencl ng a roun d
the tennis and basketball courts,
and along State Trunk Highway #96;
3. Installation of tbe swimming pool;
4. Sodding of tbe unoccupied lots
as they become occupied oxcept
during winter months; an d
5. Completion of landscaping In
. accordance with plans dated
received 5/22/75.
As security fo r the f u I I and faithful pe r-
formance of Its obligations as outlined I n
He previous sentence he ,80f,' Permi tee sha I I
deposit with the City a performance bon d,
with conditions and surety satisfactory to
the City Attorney, In the amount of ono h u n d ro d
. twenty-five percent (125~) of the estimated
cost of the construction and complotlon of the
fo re go In g Imp roveme nts as estimated In writing
by the City Engineer."
.
. 2. Amendment to Sect Ion III. E. Subsection E. of
Sect Ion III. of said Pe rml l' Is he reby amended to read as follows:
liE ~ Perml tee may se I I mob II e homos to occupy the
remal n I n 9 105 lots and allow mob lie homes to be
placed the reon pro v I de d said homes an d said lots
have been first Inspected and app roved by the
proper city officials, the re qui re d location fees
have been paid, and tho location and occupancy
permits have been I s~ued. In the event that Per-
mltee, on or after June 30, 1978, has f a I Ie d 1"0
fulfill Ifs Improvement obligations as set fo rth
In the previous subsectIon he rnof, then In addi-
tion to Its recourse on the sure l' y bond to be
postod by the Permltee and any othe r remedies
which the CIty may ut III ze to enforce this Pe rm I l' ,
the CIty may, at Its optIon, cance I, revoke or deny
eny en d all location and occupancy permits for said
105 lots . "
3. Addition of Section V I. Said Permit Is he re by amended
by adding thereto a new SectIon V I. wh I ch re ads as follows:
"Permltee shall flush the sanitary sewe rs In Arden
. Menor at least seml-annus Ily and sha I I not I fy the
CIty Public Works supervisor prior to each flushing
operation being performed."
Dated at Arden Hili s, Minnesota, this 28th day of
Novembe r, 1977.
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
By
Charlotte McNlesh,
Clerk-Administrator
.
.
.
'U
-
"'S -
H ,eCJ ;~
-------.
.'
""
0('
0(1 O~ 4 -.
.. .. '0 "
~~ " -
0 l' . .... \
4
0 0 "if <II
" . '" ..
~ .. ~ ,
... "
0 ;;: .......-
- '" o ~ ~~
. :: ..,I." ...- . I
. ,. //
~. \ '" 0
~ .., ... ~ ~ ~
. oS' .... ...
0 ,,//
..,
~ /
T /"
..
..
...:- -'...-
'"
oJ'
/
/ >
-_<.1' 0
." 0 '"
.... 0 :;
0 oD t. L"
,
. 0
/ c ,. o\. 'o~ ~'df'J'r\9\\A
..,~
, '" ... - -
, '" '" ,. , ~
, " "-' .--<,"'--
. . / 0 ,
: ~ .. '" /~ / I f
. ~ .. 0 (,,:':' /",/ //
~ , ... /'
'" ,
,
" .
. CITY OF ARDm HILLS
MEM:lRANDllM
DATE: April 26, 1994
TO: Arden Hills Planning Camlission
FRCM: Brian Fritsinger, Canmmity Planning Coordina~
SUBoJECI' : Case #94-09, Special Use Pennit for
Satellite Dish Antenna - Control Data Corporation
REOUEST
The applicant is requesting an amendrrent to Special Use Pennit #88-25
to allow for the installation of a second satellite receiving antenna,
BACKGR01JND
. The applicant previously was given a special use pennit for the
installation of a satellite transmitting and receiving antenna
(corrputer-to-ccnputer) on the roof of building #2 of the O:lntrol Data
ccnplex . This dish was 1.8 meters (5.9 feet) in diameter and was
installed so that rraxiITR.llll height above the roof was 8 feet,
Control Data is prop8sing a 14 fCXJt wire mesh satellite dish antenna
on the roof of building #3, This dish will receive cloud images fran
a U,S. weather satellite.
FINDINGS
1. Height
Section VI, I, 3 states that the dish antenna shall not extend
rrore than 12 (twelve) feet al:x:>ve the roof if it is roof rrounted.
The prop:lsed antenna is 14 (fourteen) feet in height. (Please
see merrorandum from Control Data as to the need for the 14'
antenna. )
2. Location
. The satellite dish is prop:lsed to be located near the center of
the r=f. in front of the penthouse on building #3. This is
. Case #94-09 Page 2 4-26-94
approximately 140 feet fran the "",,,st edge and 100 feet fran the
south. The r=f is approximately 29 feet in height or
approximately 1033 feet in elevation,
3. Number of Antennas
Section VI, I, 5 allows for 2 (two) satellite dish antennas in
business and industrial districts.
4. Screenina
By locating the dish adjacent to the 20' penthouse, the dish
will be totally hidden to the north, northwest and northeast.
Along roth the east and west sides of the building, a 6 f=t
high extension will provide sane screening.
The ordinance states that screening shall 1:e provided so as to
prevent direct view of the dish fran any street or public or
private property within six hundred (600) feet of the dish, The
. location of the dish is such that Control Data owns all but a
very srrall portion of the property within 600 feet. '!he only
area within 600 feet where the dish could be visible not owned
by Control Data is to the southeast on Lexington Avenue,
Beyond the 600 feet, the dish may be visible to the property
owners to the south of this site, The dish should not be
visible to any residential districts in Arden Hills,
5. Miscellaneous
The satellite dish will be fixed in one position, however, the
dish will be IT\3Ilually rotated occasionally to follow the GOES-8
weather satellite.
Other uses in the area (city water tower, broadcasting towers to
the east, lrechanical equiprrent on the r=fs of all the nearby
industrial buildings, a water tower adjacent to building #2) are
all more visually obtrusive than the proposed satellite dish.
6. Octians
A. Move to approve the amendrrent to Special Use Permit #88-25
. to allow for the installation of a second satellite
. Case #94-09 Page 3 4-26-94
receiving antenna at 4201 Lexington Avenue NOrth. This includes
a 2 f=t height variance.
B, ~ve to deny the amendment to Special Use Permit #88-25 to
allow for the installation of a second satellite receiving
antenna at 4201 Lexington Avenue NOrth, based up:ln the
lack of hardship to support a 2 f=t height variance,
7. Recc:mnendaticm
Staff recarrrencls to approve the amendment to Special Use Permit
#88-25 to allow for the installation of a second satellite
receiving antenna at 4201 Lexington Avenue NOrth. This includes
a 2 f=t height variance. The antenna is to be located as near
the center of building #3 and as close to the penthouse as
p:lssible. The antenna shall be no higher than 14 feet ab:>ve the
r=f,
. The limited exp:lS1.l.re to nearby hanes, the proximity to the water
towers, broadcasting towers and mechanical equipment on the
r=fs of the adjoining industrial buildings are unique
conditions which justify the approval.
/drnj
.
. MEMORANDUM
To: City of Arden Hills
From: Control Data Systems, Inc,
Re: Application for permit to place 14' antenna on roof at 4201 Lexington Ave, N,
On 13 April 1994, thc Nalional Oceanic and Atmospheric Adminislration (NOAA)
launched the first in a series of five (5) next generation weather salelliles. The first in this
series. GOES-8 (Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite-8) will be positioned at
900 west longitude for its first six months, eventually being moved to 750 westlongilUde,
Follow-on GOES satellites will be positioned as far west as 1350 west longitude.
Because of the signal strength of this series of satelliles and lhe relative location of
the Arden Hills facility north of the equator. the necessary antenna size to receive these
satellites is 14 feel. Control Data has just signed a contract with the government of Mexico
for the delivery and installation of a satellite earthstation and the associated software, The
contract specifies the delivery of the capability to receive the GOES-8 satellite signal for the
. Mexican Water Resource Commission (CNA). In order to meet Ihis contractual obligation,
Control Data needs to have the 14' anlenna. CNA has the responsibility to provide satellite
imagery and weather forecasts for the entire country of Mexico.
The contract with Mexico will provide continuing employmenl for five people at
Control Data, and will provide our organization with capability to bid contracts to other
countries without additional GOES antenna installations.
Since beginning the permitting process, we have rcvised the location where the
antenna will be placed on the roof in an attempt to make it less noticable to our neighbors.
The antenna will be placed in lhe middle of the roof, in front of the penthouse on mod 3.
The penthouse extends twenty (20) feet above the rest of the roof. The dish will be totally
hidden to the north, norlhwest and northeast by the penthouse. To the south, the dish will
b.e visible to several apartments in lhe apartment complex across Lexington Avenue. The
dish will be slightly visable to traffic on Lexington avenue. throught the tree line, to the
extent il extends above a six foot high extension of the penthouse on the east side of the
building. To the south. the dish will be visible, however there are no residences to lhe
south. To the west, the antenna will be visible above the six foot extension to the
. penthouse on the west side. There are homes some distance lO the west, however, there is
. also a significant tree line between those homes and the Control Data Building. It is
unlikely those homes will be able to see the antenna:
.
.
--- -- -
_ _._ _ __._ _-;_._... : __.. u
.. I I . I
t ~ I ..
' . I '" I
',C,t"..... i __.
W . I I
.'"" .. . I I. ;t"
... ;. . ~
· .....----..---------..................i --------:. ~
' !..-;u;:..!:~{~.:.;.. I : 1: a
... .... ." " -. -
...;:S'- ."- < 1- 2 : . ~
'FL,.<:- ".
'1 ='.~ ~ ! I
.. ..' ~ -r-". 'I. r
~"1:.i ~ :_' '_ !,.
---..,'?.......,.>:i'..... ~ _ ',' ... ... ......
/f . I. ~! _
. .~ I I
,
"
)'
,
\'
"
~
./
'. ~~.:)
.
'"
\ ".
."
~ ~-s
~ .
~ \~
~ ~'i-=
I t~'B-2
..
------.- ...".....>:-;.--.::-- . 'H . u:
F 1~" ..~ " /~->.., " --' --,,;~-'--...-----...,~:,;,;:, , 1_ 2 ' - ! '-a
. '" '.. -'-..., . '. ,.. .. I I.
. '," ~ ..-.---- '--..... ' ." -. .. 1 \, .
':": .. '. ... , ,". -.'. . -...- ....'.l .. '; .. , ~.
r-r:-.' - - --;"" . "~,,~_:::_"I ./ -. ...~, ..... if. ' _s
..:' -. ! . ~ -"I ....., .. \../, "", ?.... . I -I" ~ ~ I I.
JiH"- ~~ ;..-. ~( \;., ." ,..~_....' .-.. ~ ,s
'H"'-:---h'.,' \\ ..- ~""'" .,.:': ~ r-1; I.
.\..._- .' ,,\. .' .. 11/ .'t..... .t-... ~ ___ .
5]""-"""'; i~ . ., '. --... n< ~';o,.. ...'" .
iI. _ ....~~...""-.,.. Ill_ , . I
~H-it. .... /).~'-'l ,- ,-:,,-,f,.'.. .... i I'
i .. ,.. ." j - ,.., ~. -.. I
L~;.~-..~ C--\. -- ,...-.-=-.......- , . ~. _ :(: 'IT----=
... .' . ~ I' I I --:-:0- ...... I :: I . . \\:
. 'II " ./ , . I . _ r I .
\! I .. ~ _ .-.... <C::;, ~o,~. .... -. .... .
~ -~-..l ~ ~ r II. __j.... ~
. ~ .;-' '. MO~ ~PI'G' II I" ~_. I"
I ,-~.--- .::'" ~: ~~ .' I --...: _ ",--"L.!..:...J:I ' . ,. ~. ~
r .~. -. .' . V\I II ~~~/ 1"'( I' ,I '. ~
;: ' ""J' ~ .', ',..~;., ':~--, ',L. '. ~_.~ 0-4 . ',. -. ~ 2.i i _~I Q
--I '., ..'" - ',~, ~~- II"" _. ,._
:/ : ....~-.' ,,::'.:,..,..,-' : ,11 ',:,' OJ -ct:- .'"'"-....." ! _ <A
i -'-, 1 ..,.. ".' -' I \,' . ==. 'I 'Il.!.!.CJE .....'.0 _ (R 4===1
. .;";'..;' ';c/'.. ~" .~ 1'.:1 '.., """~ ~~._n_ ~
I..' ...... rL--"'~ '~':1 ..'. -S -. ~.". ..
~i::-- _.?'J~i.' -'- '.-". - ~1,' P~.("7;iilg::' I. . .
~ !,. ~_. .; -~ :',1t'-~-=:i1 ,'. .~. . .__
------- SUBJECT ZONING MAP
-- ----,.-
,
i ~--::-':;~.:;.;;..~~~ :=.: :--. I' ::,-~:- r' '1'E
. ~ ~~~ i:'~;~...t. ja . '
.} , -. ------- 9--------"'!--------10------- -, T'fIIl-S - I
~ fu ~ ; S8 ~ i ,. - - ", ; Jc
, : ~::: !} I: "" ~ _
~ .. - !i!~, -;; I .. Kg Q L =-
. ,... II ~ " TWIN I CmES ; l.. '';..J;; ..
MI'la::-- ~' '-..'I;-[JIlI< ~.
~, '1.1: I ._~ "'\ (~ li~
>:ill .IQR]'"-::'~ ~~nE~HllLS"...2!L.-~ ;i: _ -=. a..:
4~ r.<"J.\'\ I ,..~~.:\ )_... '
..I': -'''"'':-"., '_'''' \\ I -~::l!: __~ .
.2.'T;sr~,,= _..:.... 'i I I ..~_
~ ..- '-7 '.'R~E."AL .' "j~=~- I .......~~
.0( : - ::1.. I. , lOa. coOl... ~:::~. t:::::...i-
f"'~ ; ;~ I, ......; [l4!i I' '-- '0 ".-,.
~i~ t _.....lIII 1: ;! 15 == ~..l:ir.I.~:-~~.
~~ - 'III i--.:..... --, ..:--------.1--------- ------ $" ;~,u. :.... '~;:
I .; "J ..... . _ 1:,; '..
. ,..... ~ I' '.- o.
, \/1 1"', j,< I IPI t:J "'. ,,;if
t fl.. I _... :c I
'(~~t\ -- ,~~, ! .--.... ~: I' ~--~~
w ---", - """- I f I :I ~y.. .," ~-J
_ctl~ ,"~j I := I ~,:;. '-_.......NVl'lf
L [~s~~JI~~. 196.. ,,~_~". i I,.~: ~i "L,';
;::;"~:5'-:"'EW';::'''U......: :' r f.:: i...-"" 'Ii '.,' ~""~l \ ~ ~
..W z,-;: :'4. . /, ~~ . ,I., -. -R \\.
5{-BR'lGHTON ~ '\ 1 ,,". -:.'. " ..;.. . SNMe .~
'"~ ,~\- '.. ~ ( '\'<. f\ "':;::...... --- ....., 'D.
~t~" :-:: \ '~~ :. ~ L..iKJ: V. ~'I__ w9~~i c-r.K~. 4Sf1ll . ~ ~ J .
~~ .; ,of.' ,.: ~ I ?; .~ : u...... ~ . - II t..4.Ja
[)moUTI 1I""~ . M..s~'~jaeb)o..~.=!:'1~": j -~~ ~ '-:
,l~'\ ' . ~.. , ,~'<." _c"' '. _ ... ~~ ~'~ ,_
~"'\1"" ' "'. I~ I .~' 'l, - """.0: .0(",-:, 1__
'~"". \~~. . : ~ ~ IJr..u ",C.: }'.. ~~- : ~~~ -'11~. :1.:."
::: 0 :: _\ -- "I , . ~ _;,'i I'
-" .... Q . 'C _ "I;;.:;., ;;lit .' -
~,.. ," I. " .. _ c '\ " _.;1., ::.::.
~~ "', ~._.. ~.; 0/ jp:-.;'1.~.J 'l~~; _, "f:f.j~..,,~.. . r;~ I~
. 1 - ~~'-_I'el' ""C. ,RO. ".,,-' r.::':,'\.j~ CO. . " IL! !I..,>'~' ;
0_.-" lZ I i.t~~ 1.:; "":::'~:, ~ ...~~ 19'. i .~,--- I
~o j',:"tl ~~'ll! ~l~l:~l ~ ~I: lltO.~ ~~ ~ '" \l '-- _1 QT tAyt l:--
~15T ",'Nt 1"1, ~ >:1% ..t:ll.'=" _ ~ _..~
=, "'I' ~Il' ~,,," ~'. m ~ .."-'_..".,~ v.,.....,,;, ~ . \.. ~.J!"""'" ~
",:;~ fZj"'lz %~ j'I'Z \:!!.J :':.--:...a- ~J..~ -; _ oWIIIT-lVE.........-.
~T~'C'.. ~ I~HI.o( ~1~nlW.l5:;/.. I,.oH)? r;;;t'll : 1;;
:C':--: ~!i b.1:J}>~ r I:::: ~IA .......... -= ~ -lVE.: )... ,"--- ___ :u:.JFOX RO, ___ ~ ;
,'~'~D .7,- o. ";iN' :~flff ( , "fPu';- i
".;?>~~;~~'I~ -I if"',' I 81. ~'f'l'ru: .~ z;~ ..;jl,;=,.,-.,r;
'S:~':'" - '= .,,::: ... ".w. ~ "~--:-::R_~..~ ...~ ~ . ~ 1ft ~;---i~~ o. V~ ~
'''-. "I ~"'-"'-""- - 0 ) .",.,g.;;':'; .
~.,~~ ......ii1... '" ~ .""':::. '::'t>:t. ... <... . ..y :: !l'"
~:~~'~~'-I _ _ ,0...,. "" ~~-"', , .....- 1'0.1: .. : ::. L~: ~
'I 1",,%. . "ZI<<!' '_, ......... .. -..... ""1tE _ """~.~
I:I":i":~,;..: "" :.~ P. J...--"'F;;j .. . '--'ii...j~ ~.......'-- ""."" L<> co;O;. .
~~'!l~ . . , ." ___G.'. -
.~:\ t..~l - '>~" .:'.' /;qf}l~$~\~ J[' I..:.I'Q"::'''''~ . S)' :r.;
,! I -= r w l~~"r~:::; 1-: ~...~.. ~\ : ~'_~~_ ~~'=
1Jl!-s Tn ,s.w. 1ft _ ~..J ~~ !.: .....~... : ...I. =..1 r.-..O ~:;
~;~ ;1 ~ 100 ~-r.>o~ ~e"'~;- 'O+~ r /'\~::i.A ~:.. ! ;.......... ~ .{f 'I( ,,~.. Wr 1_ _ J
~~ "@~ ~ I --. '5"~'~\' I U' - \ 1--. i:O~-- ,
[H .~ ~~I A. .\.JOHANNA ~ .je",.! -t~_~";; ~ o.,!;W(. · ~: ~ \1
.'m.; 11 ~~. L:," ' yt,!!'" ~
. -::; .... )0 . '. '"[45 .."". -;:',r.c ;:." '~ .11:' i"'-"
In: ss : liCj:: oJ LAn:: !l. \. , 'z._-
~.;. :. :~,... "!'~~~. ,1'71::"< 1~;;,J., ~ . rrp.~'::....~ /
. ~ ,- ~ ."".. ~ - i'\" ~ -:-"";f' ~ _li' A-
':'. '.d'J!J'l- ~ 'SSI [,. .~ '&. J. I i' -l-~ - ~
. I II<I:I~,.-r/. ...)...~.... .'"":"~.. ~ "":. ~"e; 06 11 .....'- v''-<...~~
~l . II II tit r-:-~'. ~~h--.'o-,~\k- ~ \i '~'I vE(!: -1/ u
~- .0" ~I j,(' l~ li"'~' "" ~....< "-..'" .,;: ;, on':"r Iz':;;. l.<U<S '.~
...--... .co .I......a ~~ ~N ~\. ....n 'fJ.- //"
~> V.~ J- z';i~;~'~" -'.. .f.i".,.'L.. :~. I ........~ ~.~ ;> ~~' '
, .~,~... (- -<'1: ~II I ~ '~1mIT '...- ~'" ~ '" ·
V,?"! 'I f ...~~ ,/ ,..".~, ~; , I -'.. ;'\ .':': '" .~ ~
;7'i":~' ~ 1: ~ !,...,' ~ ~~ :- I J: "'" .....<;
E; 0 :.. ., ~(;::. ~1J\~"'1 :I J f":: _
. "" ""S-a" 'I: I . "~. ..,...,,'f("\, 'rs; -r. . . '":= ~'" .k!;'o ... ,. ~
, Q .0 ;J; ~~ ~ -=-; I ~l z ~ , ~
~ :! ~i L 'oli~~~t~ ~ ~,v~g g( ~ 11 L>.LZJ~O..i
"------ SUBJECT LOCATION MAP
------,-
_"~ 'L.~.:J,y . . I
~' ",,-,', 0". '-~ U ' _h_
.. .., I' \. "-. ".. '..",.
. " ' .... : <," - . ",",' 'I'
I I _ ,,- .;. ,- / \ J .--.
,,_^-. 'C00, 'I I \ ,\;. ././ '\ '\. I
.': : ... __ ','0 ,~, \'~ // ' \ - '-.. . I'
. I. \ . \' ,,,' .' I ' . . '
'---""_0 ' , ~:.o/ , I, . ;" ::: \ " \ \- \ -0
__ _,,"" I \.. ,- [-,'" ~ .
'c' r '\ " _ -- h 1\" 'I' ~\. _,0".',' \
. \.{' '"'-,' __.... ._____ ", ,i' 'j ..
\. '. ____. loe," , ,.... --._, . \
\ < J ' , .,' ". "---' .,
\; . ~~~,~' . 'a"': "o~ ...........-:... '..:'.\
1~ '00" I -'- . f I '-. .. - .' '.. '" \.
," ' .:' ': '_':::::::. '-',/>-'-.c;.: ...-... :-.=::;;::-;~----' .:,,".,'.,','
I '0:" 'I \ ..---..-------.- '. '-c' ..~---::::-:...d",\\
': ~~ I, \, -. ,..~~-",;~~~ ..C'-r-....,.'....~\
,'~ ,t. .'00'.' ~ ~.,."
.- -----r- I Ii-......- - ,.... ,..'
no,... Jl ......; I "0:-- . "I""'"
~'o'o -:/-J II~a""" 0 ~'i\.;I\
~ '000 _" \ 1 '-. ~ \.. ,., :
~? --1---. i_____-.........' ,I
\ Ill009.7 ',_ j--_ '. 1\ '.' .,' i
JjOOU ~To" '"00" I 0" ( ", \'..: .... '." . "'."'"
. V --- "00'.' \ \ "'.' ,\ '\
.97.1 -----s i .101:S"i~"i; ....
. 11006.. -- -,' ,; c., g ~',
~-::.~... .,
)(1001 ~ \' I '\,-- ~
. 11001.3
, ~1'.
_ _ G. _ .'008.4 (OOE.'.
-000 ~ ij ;..'''<:::::~~~~ lJ
--... ,,'006 J 0 .
j... ~ \. '00$...___ '.
\" ...-...... ' . / "\ 0
~j_ I. ~ '- ~ \~ i '00..0 ~.
- I ________..---.-/ ...~. .~' I
~ ..... \
"~~ -- "';~'~~'\ ~.,.
_/< . ..~.. ) I I \:r.~ j ."'~o
"0 ], - ~ J.i.... h. \
T! .'": '<~.;n --4t
'Iff ii !!;?~ 1~O'VoseJ) g
II. - SA'T!.I..LI1'e' .
-' i'\ ~
, ~'17" 'I I
~0-' /
s.. "'" /' "
,.,.? ' I' ./! . J(lQ1.'
/ ( , ~__/ 1
.,,,/ I, :'1___1.1'___-] ~ \. ,.-;ow.
/~~ " .' I' .~. ~.~ """,
~~ "'0' I' / . L:::: .
". " \ I '"
~=''''T.I.-/.:. I I 1 . ':, ~ ~I~
.o:998.T \;(/ I' I II 1 / i"J Z
0.., .... "'! I -
- \I~. - -
'OOM' 1'1' I -' I
~ 'O( . ~I"'" , -- "".000
~ \'>-.... ~I I '\ '
.~ 01.1 I' I~\ I'I I
'<P".2 9.' ! -- '
!.: "." 'I ; , ~
~ 1':;1; 1 HI. '." ,I IJ ...., I I'
/ .... . 'I \ \ ; --, r ,; I . ~ r---
____ I ~ II ,~I'
____... __J\---- Ill, I,' . I
L-/, ~,,' \ I ~_ I t~_L "';'f-:r' ,....J II, r..
/ n I I I -- .,.~'.. -- .. I .
I .... .. -'" , :-
, ' . ~.. . U ' OJ..../ '.. i
.. ". " , ~ ~ .
'U ,..--__ -" - '" II I "".'/
I --. _ __. f' . ," ." .--.J
~'" ~~ ~" '''~-.~:_=:~~. ---r - no. =- .,=.., '.' . - --
. ",,-.,- \, .,,,., .", " i_I
','.:_. _'_ __ __. I \ I
.--;. __'_ -~'-1
. \, M' '1 1..,..,00
.",'43 /__'_, . I
C.,__ \)" . I
., -.:c..::.. _..' , . I
\ >..~..'- / \J'.I
;" \ /"\ \ '/
.' " .
, . ". .~., . \ ,
~ ~ / ,n" . .~ .J----';
_. ,_, ( -.. I
__.~ --:-_-- Fe _.~ ")1'
.~, ..' \ i
. ,. " ~
-
_lr ~J~ L 1_ IJI IIJJJ
-1 I - r:..- r -r- '-' '0 I I 1 I .
. I, L i c::...J;- ,n I l' . ""L'~-L--Ll~ . t
~ l "c'C 1.:- ,- u - n'R....LJ
EEEI-= ~ II _ -,.,1 ,1-I,llTI -)~J.J OJ
r~~;'- ~)i]I.rxl I, ~' ':-~.:EB [
L L. ~ ~ ." ;-;", "' . e' tJ !=h ~l '-r ~
_~~,~ . . ,c ' t::t:i I"CIJ Ill"
I. i L .i III
W_..J Cl _["- ' " ]I-It-,J ..
~_~'_ .<,..,- - ~- EB F-- I
I ~ JOH' ,'T' , . ,~I -r' 0.:1 I ..
=- _ Co ,-<,: .iL .,' I 0 U-1. I r--< Il.
, :c:! '" ''-'.1. 'Ii ,TTl LT! ill f-
'-1;:-.= {'" ]',' c' : '. I 0 u~ '1:::: '- ~
..J~ ',I I. ..- T " I '- Z "
I I ~;'J' L..... L I LI'III J ~s 1.1 foO~,,1 Q ~
h-_ ,I. l L..,....;.' i~'~.'- · (\J
T 2-n ~'. J ~ -, ~ _IL~ . . .. ~ a;s
. ,-,' " ,;f ~....' ,1 W,i-~
1 ' ;;,,';"_ I '. ,( ll' Q I ~l ~..~ -' I [3
. ~" 1 L' '. I '~J~H 1- I ~ ~ j ~:;:
" :-.i;..'.fJ..,.... l' I . , I' :--. ,.;:- I L.... F-- 0
__ ,," _'.. ":l: " . "
,_ . ;- I:: t ':: -,,-.J-,b,e. ,tJ h- TI - . 0
L / ' ,_ J - ~ LJ' __U ·
L i l"', . ') I - r: .- '1 '--
1-". _ I ~ t l"'- -ftj'1\ 1 ~ -, jl,- - I:' I -
,_,_ ~.3 - --l<'l'!D' 1 r '-[i:-- ~
L... N.1 ~-ll J .
h ~l I -" II =1= T'fl. U r .., ': l!TI ~
1-'-' L: ." :t .:W I -, 0 ..
rI~ I ,.~II ., "n l--
IL --.l- fJ'L I I IT..1 ~ i .~. L :I
::"'TI,'-::~-I '1'0 11[tD~[ r'l
I ."'8 1 _ ~r:LIJr~ I~ '-
. "1 11 . -, -1- I ''==.. I
~-11! l'w I [.;; ~1f~
~ . ~ . vu 'i I
;; '~', ,H. J if'
12' ) (
!,~, T! :;,
L .~_.. ~'I' ' i .~.
'0." .. ~ - '
L::::[ )
. ~...-,~. . . , . ?
.:.-:;>
. ..~ .
_ )') 0 ~~. . -"(
vl"l- ' (/'0 r:
~~~ ( '- I' . -
;-... - (/. ~ "
'e /, ,=.0. ""
_(( ~" '0Y
~(I
WEST S~ev~ Ei~5~i 4158~45168 P.03
PARACI-n~SE OFFERS
'''-lel ~
Whenever strength and
endurance are Important - the
Paracllpse Classic series. Paraclipse
Classic antennas represent state-of-the-
art in the MO induslly Precision
engineered to face Florida hUfTlcanes or
California desert heat the tough and
durable antennas in the Classic line will
suNive the worst that nature can throw
at them. Day after day. J€ar after year.
riley will deliver great reception.
The '4~ foot CD will provide
horizon-to-horizon reception in the j
fringe areas of the satellite footprinl - 1\
The new 14'12 foot Islander with the
polar r. moont is designed to meet a { L ( :/1/ ./1 f.-P.
desirable price point for dealer and user. J IzI . ~ g:
The popular and robust 12 foot ....~ oj..
antennas are rYJW available with two OP , .;.' v
ft-Lt;; j')'-JL( , ' ....,.: . ""
types of mount: the horizon-ta-horizon No matter how weak the signal,
CD, 0( the sturdy polar T mount. E~.racl_f!~ these top selling antennas will provide
excellent reception coast-to-coast.
Just like its big brothers. the 10
C~L_ASSIC Plus is built to last, and will provide
~ great reception in most areas of tt-,e
continental United States.
A t/alll' l!Udy In strength and performan,e All steel parts are sealed and
protected with a bakecl-on powder-
co.;wng. Our house color is Smoke
Blue. Other colors are available as
chargeable options.
{~{
I
..
The pre<lllon tr"klng
14l/z' horlzocHo- .
horizon CO Clanlc: ,
I
I 'I
.
crrr OF ARDEN HILLS
. MFMJRANDT.JM
DATE : April J., J.994
TO: Arden RiUs Planning Ccmnissian
FRao{: Brian Fritsinger, Crnwnnli.ty Develcpnent Coord:ina~,)
SUE.JErl' : Case #94-05 SUP for service statian
Applicant: 'Iheodore Brausen, OWner. Am:x:o
REQUFSr
The applicant is requesting an approval for a Special Use Pennit to
operate a service station at 13J.0 County Road E.
BACKGROUND
The applicant =ently operates an .I\mxx) Service Station and carwash at
1306 Cbunty Road E. This property is owned by 1\rterican Oil Carpany and
leased to the applicant, The applicant has recently acquired the fonner
Great lakes Restaurant, 1310 County Road E, and is prOfOSing to convert
. the use into an 8 bay Armco Certicare, The tYoO existing service bays in
the existing Azroco station will l:e converted to convenience store use
and the third bay into storage.
The proposed building is located within a B-2, General Business
District. Service stations are alle<oJed only by SUP in this district,
NO gas or fuels will l:e dispensed fran this site, only autarobile repair
is proposed. Physically, the change will involve raising the =f
several feet and rebuilding much of the interior, ~ver, the
f=tprint of the building will remain unchanged.
The existing building and site plan was reviewed and approved as part of
Case #74-15, The site plan was approved subject to T,H. #51 l:eing
considered the front yard. It appears that a "waiver" or variance was
granted for the setbacks; hc:mever, it is unclear in the minutes as the
specific "waiver".
The building is a non-confonning building because of the existing
setbacks, Under section IX, A, 2 of the ordinance a non-confonning
building rray exist SO long as it is used for the pu:rp:>ses pennitted in
the zoning district in which it is located. Because the incallpatibility
. is rrerely technical in nature it shall be exerrpt fran the provisions of
Section IX. In other YoOrds. this non-confonning use can continue.
--.-
.
FINDItm
. 1. Site Plan - The total site consists of approximately 47,000 square
feet, The building is 3.940 square feet in size which is
significantly less than the 40% maximum coverage allowed in the
Ordinance.
Sq11rirp Fcotaae --L
Building Coverage 3,940 8%
Parking Coverage 26,014 55%
If the Planning Ccmnission was consistent with the original site
plan review and considered T,H. 51 as the front yard, the site
v.ould rreet all setback requirerrents except the north setback. The
ordinance requires a minimum of 20 feet and the existing setback
is only 10 feet.
2. Parking - The station, under Section VI, F, 1, j, is required to
have 3 spaces for each enclosed bay plus 1 for each employee on
the peak =rk shift. Under this fonnula, 32 spaces v.ould be
required, 50 spaces are shown on the plan,
Section VI, F, 1, (b) addresses access to parking. There is no
. direct access to a public street on this property . Access is
provided through an access easerrent with the adjacent property
owner.
3. Refuse - Section VI, G, 2 addresses refuse. The applicant is
prop:>sing new 12 X 12 enclosures for trash and tires. This design
should match the existing building construction.
4, Drainage - No water managerrent plan is required for this plan.
New =b and gutter are proposed which =uld continue to carry the
water to the SW corner of the lot. No grading or elevation
changes are planned, No additional run-off is projected.
5, Light.ina - The lighting plan rreets all requirerrents of Section VI.
E, 3. Fixtures will consist of tretal halide light sources in
"shoelx>x" style fixtures which shield the light sources, Fixtures
will be rrounted on p:>les at 14 feet al::ove the ground,
6. Signage - No specifics have been presented in regards to signage
for the site.
7. Screening - The r=f-top rrounted equiprent will l::e s=eened per
. section, VI, E, 4, (jJ of the ordinance by rretal black fascia
material.
.
8. Building [)(o,sign - The building will be of gray painted brick and
.. =ncrete block to match the existing Arroco station.' Windows and
doors will be dark anodized aluminum, The overhead doors will be
full vision with anodized alumimJm frames, A continuous 26" wide
red band will separate the grey brick/block fran a 4 foot wide
rretal black facia at the top of the building, Building height is
proposed at 18 feet,
9. Iand="Ding - The site as it exists, does not meet the required
25% landscaped area. The applicant has rret the minimum landscaped
area by proposing to realign the pavement setback along the south
property line and intrcducing a bertred island next to the east
access.
The 3 foot high berm with eight 6 foot Black Hills Spruce trees
will provide a screen for the clinic to the east. An existing 6-
7' hedge runs the length of the south property line. There are
scattered trees along the south and east property lines, With the
additional landscaped area adjacent to the building all
requirements appear to l:e rret.
In reviewing the requirements of the landscaping plan, 12.3
. caliper inches of tree is required on this site, The existing
landscaping when considered with the proposed screening next to
the clinic rrore than exceeds this requirement.
Section VI, D, 2, (a) addresses special landscaping requirements
for service stations. 'Ibis requires that landscaping be provided
to the following depths fran each lot line.
(1) 20 feet from front - In ccmpliance
(2) 10 feet from each side - North lot line not in
ccmpliance.
(3) 15 feet from rear - In carpliance
The difficulty in meeting this requirement along the north lot
line is that the existing elevation change makes the requirement
unfeasible. 'Ibis would require the building to be relocated and
the loss of 8 parking spaces,
10, Access - Access to the site is possible only through an access
easerrent which allows vehicles to cross the property located to
the east.
.
.
RECCfo!.IENDATICNS
. Staff recanrends, subject to the following, the site plan and SUP be
approved .
1. All pennits necessary fran the ~tropolitan Waste Control
Ccmnission, Pollution Control1\gency. and Ramsey County and
other pennitted agencies be secured with copies delivered to
the City prior to issuance of a building pennit,
2. The access easem=nt documents be reviewed and approved by
the City Attorney,
3, Exterior signage plan be reviewed and approved by the
Ccmnunity Planning Coordinator,
The conditions of the SUP be as follows,
1. Maintain all necessary 1=1, state and federal pennits.
2. No parking of damaged vehicles, unlicensed vehicles or
inoperable vehicles be all~ in the lot beyond 7 days.
3. The trash and tire enclosure doors retl'ain closed at all
. tirres except when loading or unloading trash
4, No unscreened exterior storage be pennitted and display of
miscellaneous products (ie, oil, antifreeze, tires, etc.,,)
be =ntained in appropriate cabinets or racks.
BF:to
.
.
,
.g I..i.':": I ':........~.
\\ .. -
\ 1,4'!..'
,. , ,
- i I
, i ~ ""
i I '>
" - ~ ~
" ~
~
. i: _-J-J ! Ui
.
" - - -
1-1 .
,
.
. OOA ....
, "-
. I
. " _II I
. "/'
! '\, /. /' ,
. )'i:/ ,
. ;
. :/
..
. ..
--. ..
- . ..
-1 ...
..
\. l't. v.. ~ . ..
..
. s. ·
. - .. .
: ... .
. " .
'- . i .
. R~ !='ox R A' , ~(
.
. IU
.
t; . =
..-/-... . III ... .
(/ .r...._) . I-FbE~,i Q . Ii
: J . =
- . .
. " ~
. III ~ . Ii
....-- -. . - '" 0 Ii ""
/ ,jj,,,...... . GREY ~ 0)( Rl"" . =
, <./' \ ..1"",,; . .
. ,'.... !
, /)' ,./, Ii BJa II!
/-' I ; "
.}~.;.>/,' ! i '"
.,,'/ . III ,1-
" ,-
; "
\\ ~ ire-
I ,.,
!
i'
"
),
, \
..." ~
..
.. .,. , . '~lIr
'.... '" ,
. ,c+~
.\ 0 R-1
I ,;:.' ~ .... ;<
I : .,-'
~ \ :,,'- ~--=--.-
-
-
.
KRECH, O'BRIEN,
. MUELLER ~ASS, INC.
ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS
6115 CAHILL AVENUE INVER GROVE HEIGHTS. MN 55076 612451,4605
March 1, 1994
Mr. Brian Fritsinger
Planner
City of Arden Hills
1450 West Highway 95
Arden Hills. Minnesota 55112-5794
RE: Amoco Station, SS #5351
Dear Brian:
As part of the redevelopment of the Steak Inn into an Amoco Certicare Service Center. Amoco Oil
Company wishes to expand the convenience store in the existing station into two of the service bays.
The remaining bay would be used for storage. The pump islands, canopy and car wash would remain
unchanged.
. The remodeling would create a 1,740 SF convenience store with 544 SF of storage space. No
automotive service areas would remain on this site. As all of the remodelling is within the building
footprint, no changes would be made to the site.
The enlarged store will require parking of 12 stalls by ordinance. Currently there are a minimum of 18
stalls provided on the site.
Please review this information and contact me if any further details are required. (451.46051
If the proposed remodelling is within the current special use permit, please send a confirming letter to:
Mr. Steve Amick
Amoco Oil Company, West Zone
5001 West 80th Street, Suite 801
Minneapolis. Minnesota 55437-1181
Please send me a copy of the let1er
Sincerely.
~ G. ~
Brian C. Wass, AlA
. KRECH. O'BRIEN, MUELLER & WASS. INC.
.
~r:~
"".'"
""""-...
"',
.~l :
.-.
,~ .
tnl
~ ~- b.
,
! : I .
!ill l .
. , I -
, -d
,
,
, "', , lidS
, h
,
,
, t .
:: I!! I Ii! I PI ~ ~ ~ .\
' .! l i II pi .(
: Ji I Iii ----,
,\JHtH 1-11
-I ,
T ~
il-
l_. :
i .
, 11-, ~
,
,
, - ..
,
, ..
,
I , ,
,
. 'I: , .-. -
-- -~, ----I
, , ,~- --
, t
,
4 I 11'1 I
: I 'jli i
:- l~
:=:)
: - =1
.
- -
- -
-- -
- IUtll~ ~
L_ I i\llli
iii Hi
i;', i
. 'I'
!
.-. ,
[~
ill I SITE PLAN ~--~-- ~[lQ~~
AMOCO CEATlCARE ~~*=-: ~~
~ I I I COUNTY ROAD E & SNELUNI3 AVE. 111.........-............ Ilf:m
--.um.._.........._
ARDEN HILLS, MN ="...~':"..::..~; .. ARCHITECTS NGINEERS
-~ .
--~- ~________ 61.." r......, ""'ENUE ~"'f" ''''''YF llE'''~<TS. 1.4.. ""~07e f"~_."'l_....()O
--
.
~
..,.. I-.t
~ . ^va CD
^v~
1...1.../^vC . 0
S7 C
4,v~ I Z
0
1^vi...J~ )>
:::0
-<
~_. )>
Z
0
1__-
I. -l
! 0
~ '1)
" 0
~ (I C>
; i ~ ; ~
I
I i I .. '1)
::c
~ -.... ()
! a ..
:\ U (/)
c
I ;vi ~ c
l -- :::0
, <
I .1 n. __ . EGADS tAStW(Nf "~ rr1
1 011 ; -<
---
-..... .,.,
-.... ! I . 0
I I
0 :::0
I~ i I IS
i ~ I . CD
I . I .
. ~ AJ
"
I ~ )>
.
...... .
C
11"1 I (J)
1 I fTl
I .. Z
I
fTl
II.UC.M_.~.".I"."af.1t ...." Z
--j
fTl
AJ
r u
I AJ
I. ~
-
(J)
II i :- ~ 0 fTl
II . (J)
II ; -
-
z
0
.
--
.
-l':-'(
..."",
"~
",
$71
.........
.
!~ ~ .
~ 0 1
~ ~ I'
, I. ~+',.-;Gt;?'~th:'j~,,;:t;>j r
. I :.: II I
. !i !ill II 1
'j '.)!.c~W: I ~
[- f
..
t
, "')
"')
= j
. .
~- = !~
('- - i
. - I ~
F
.~. n
..\,..,. .,
P 11111 /
!1I1l111
11 !: Ii i I
J II i I I
CD !II I
<Ii
. I
'1 Ii'
Ii! Ii!
II!
-- I ~ II LANDSCAPE PLAN "',==-=--':=, It ~ 0C!Rilll'IDlHI.~
"J" AMQCOCERTICAAE ~~-=- ~
COUNTY ROAD E & SNElUNQ AVE. '~:':i":.~':o.~"= ~ ~Df:m
W 1 I I ARDEN HILLS MN =-..."=~~..- ARCHITECTS NG1NEERS
L' -.., fJ1'"J..C.....J ,o,vENuIi """If" """\IF HE>OI'TS....... ",or'7e e1~-<P.l'-~
.
S'1';1-(
, ""'...,
'-- ,,""
-. ",
---
"- ,
r, Z
.~! I ......... ...--- oP-...-'....,__________...--"'''''''-~.......- ,-~."
' ,
1 -
! lr--_ I
--- -- ,
"
H ,
~ ,
, ^
~ , ,
, , "'..."'-
I I
, .,..--' "',,".'. :-.' - -----
I ,':'" .. - ,
, I ~'" ,
, . ,
t 1 I
- .... ' I
fil! I ......... '...." I
I
, " '- ' I
, I .....~- ,
, -c I
,
, '~
,
, I
:..:...,
II ~ .
, ~ ~ I
" , ,
-~, \ "
I
, ,
,
H-M~/ , i
, ~
\ ,
,
II ,
" ,
" i
"
" ---"'.........\ -- ~
'I
!l ---------- \ ... -,~
I , ..
, , ,
I
a - _'-~:__ii---------_____ _""*!~_
. I
I
I ---------------------------
.
- =1
.
~
- ~
- ~
I
- ------
,~"
.
}> P I I GRADING PlAN ::'='=":1=11' ~~<W'~
AMOCO CERTlCARE ~~"=,=",,g.;:&"':l '!Ml1lJIEIUumRi~
~ I ! I COUNTY ROAD E & SNELUNG AVE. N_......................... nf:JO.
-..---..-
ARDEN HillS. MN =".....-=.":~; ARCHiTECTS NGINEEAS
_k .
___ !lH~ CAlfLl ,",VEr<<JE fivER ""D~ HElBIlS I.IN ~"n7ti tlU'-~el-~
.
0' I II
. II I
I
n II
~ I I /
. .
u "' I II n "' I Ii II II
Ii I II I
~ I ~ I II I,
~ ~! II Ii
; L-
2 2 - ~
I / / / I I
-
II
. B -
'I
II
I-J
-
"' I II
II I I
I- . II
II U
~ I I I
II ~
~
I,
_JI
.
I -
.
)> pI ! ELEVATIONS I StGNAGE ::.=-=":t=II~~~
AMOCO CERTK::ARE ~~- ~-- 00lJIBJLJUB1Ri~
..c....__....-._...
U1 II I COUNTY ROAD E & SNEWNG AVE. ........OO............lolQ.. ~. uno.
-.:0..__...._
ARDEN HillS, MN =-<f"~~~; ARCHITECTS NGINEERS
-~
D"~""""L"~ t'tv_ I;lftOIItil ~TIl....... 1lIlCI7111 .1a-dl-"-
, ..
.
.~l
,<>
l~
~ .
~
~
.0
~ ~
-
.
,,~-
"
~ ~
~ ~
.
........ Ill! SITE LIGHTING PLAN :::'=':I":I==- ~~~
.J>- ~ AMOCOCEATICAAE :=011......"=>.::=--:-:- ~ 'i.\N~~
COUNTY ROAD E & SNElliNG AVE ~~~':.~.: ' .v~ Ilfm
en II I ARDEN ,.....S MN =='.'-=~-=; ARCHITECTS i!J.'YIfJ NGINEERS
'...,.... ~
B.,,,,I!~....ve_ _f;ll"IQ"'~l......l><la7" .'''''4'11'-_
. CITY OF ARDEN HILI.S
MJM)RAN!JtM
DATE: April 26, 1994
TO: Arden Hills Planning Camlissicn
FRa.!: Brian Fritsinger, Canmmity Planning Coordinato~
SlJl3JEX:'l' : Case #94-08, Special Use Penni.t for Auto Body Shop
Applicant: Abra Auto Body & Glass
REOUEST
The applicant is requesting an approval for a Special Use Permit to
operate an 8000 sq, ft. Abra Auto &xly & Glass in the multi-tenant
property known as 3777 North I.exington Avenue (ZEDS building) ,
BACKGRlJON[)
. Abra is a 9 year old business that has offered services devoted to
auto l:x::d:y repair and finishing. These services include painting,
collision repair, and wheel alignments,
Abra =ently has 20 locations throughout the Metro MinneapolisjSt,
Paul area. The 20 businesses are located in the following types of
real estate,
l. Freestanding buildings
2, Autcma1.ls
3. JVW.ti-tenant buildings
4. Auto dealerships
Abra considers itself a light to medium collision auto l:x::d:y repair
business. Abra does not accept or repair autorrobiles that are
considered "totals," Abra does not store autarobiles outside the
facility. All repairs are rrade on an aPfOintrnent basis for roth
deli very and pickup of the auto.
The proposed location is the former ZEDS building on North I.exington
Avenue. '1be proposed location is the last rerraining vacant space in
. the facility. ZEDS and P.C, Tailor w':lUld occupy the space on either
side of the proposed Abra.
. FINDINGS
l. Zoni.nq
nus area is zoned B-3, Service Business District. An auto body
or collision repair center is not identified on the Land Use
Chart . Under definitions, this use w:>uld best be categorized as
a repair garage. A repair garage is also not identified on the
Land Use Chart,
Section V,C,b,2 specifies that uses not listed on the Land Use
Chart as either permitted or special uses may require the
issuance of a Special Use Permit, Of those uses identified on
the Land Use Chart, garage repair would be rrost similar to a
service station or rrotorized vehicle service. Both of these
require an SUP to operate in a B-3 district,
2. Parking
Of the types of uses listed in Section VI, F, 1, (j), service
station appears to be rrost appropriate, nus use requires 3
parking spaces for each bay plus 1 for each errployee on the peak
. work shift. The business has 13 bays and 8 errployees for a
total required parking of 47 spaces,
The ordinance also states that in a multiple occupancy
structure, that it is necessary to provide 1 space for each
space required for each separate use, The site has a total of
119 parking spaces available. The current tenants are required
to provide the following number of spaces:
Packaging Store = 10 spaces
ZEOS = 16 spaces
P.C, Tailor = 32 !WCices
Total 58 spaces
In addition to the parking available on site, the property owner
has a rerrote lot located on Red Fox Road which can be used by
employers of this facility. 'The site appears to meet parking
requirements.
3. Refuse
'The applicant is proPJsing a 6 f=t s=eening fence around the
trash bin located in the rear of the building.
.
. 4. Signage
The sign is a back lit single facade cabinet. Total size is 100
sq. ft, The sign should be no larger than 100 sq. ft. or 10% of
the building facade,
5. Screenina
'The applicant is prq::osing to screen all r=f top equipment.
This 4' high screen would be 1TI3.de of curb and metal.
6. Access
Access to the site is !X)ssible only through an ingress/egress to
Lexington Avenue on the northeast comer of the site,
7. Other Imcrovements
The applicant is pro!X)sing that a 40' x 10' bittuninous ramp be
const:ructed on the west side of the building to allow for
vehicular entrance through an existing loading bay, A concrete
unit retaining wall will be const:ructed on either side of the
ranp,
A new overhead d=r and custarer entrance will be installed on
. the east side of the building.
The plans include the installation of all required mechanical
equipment to operate a paint l:::ooth, The building inspector has
reviewed the plans and approved them for canpliance with the
State Building Code.
8. Miscellaneous
A pw:pose stated for the B-3 zoning district is to encourage
grouping of corrpatible and mutually supp:>rtive business uses and
services.
A represer1tative of the property owner has indicated to staff
that b:>th p, C, Tailor and ZEDS were contacted ab:>ut Abra. Both
of these cc:rnpanies apparently had no concerns ab:>ut this use
l=ating in the adjacent space.
9. Cotians
A, Approve Special Use Permit #94-08 to operate an 8000 sq,
ft, Abra Auto Body & Glass at 3777 North Lexington Avenue
with the conditions as described below.
.
. B. Approve Special Use Permit #94-08 to operate an 8000 sq,
ft, Abra Auto Bcdy & Glass at 3777 North Lexington Avenue
with revised conditions.
C, Table the request for further infonration frcm staff,
D, Deny the request.
10. Recc:mnerJdation
Staff MJUld recorrrnend approval of Special Use Permit #94-08 to
operate an 8000 sq,ft, Abra Auto Bcdy & Glass at 3777 North
Lexington Avenue.
The conditions of the Special Use Permit be as follows:
A, Maintain all necessaI)' local, state and federal permits.
B, No parking of damaged vehicles, unlicensed vehicles or
inoperable vehicles be allowed in the lot beyond 24 hours,
C. TIle trash enclosure dcors remain closed at all times
. except when loading or unloading trash,
D, No unscreened exterior storage shall be permitted,
E. TIle exterior sign plan be reviewed and app:roved by the
Cannunity Planning Coordinator,
F. Any carplaints from adjacent tenants in regards to noise,
fumes or other related issues shall cause the City to
review this permit.
Idmj
.
l'-- I
i" . ~ , :. r I .. ....
l'i11'i'i'i'i'; ;1;1
'1"'1':'1"" , ~-r
I , ,"1"1"1' i I";
~ 1 : , J II I " , ;
H " . I. I !
"" " 1"'1111 ' ;
;~;.! ,1 ! II I J . .
. ,'d. :. "'11"1"1 I,I . ;
~~ ~::~" :,,, ".: I 0 ;
J- ~. ~~.. . I I'll U q;
V lJ ,i!j;4 j'j : ~ ~ r; I- b 1
\ ~~ ~l., lJ I' . l j f ,Ill II z
~ j~ .J .J. J::~' : r,' I "d' I w ~ I
.: ,~ , _ I I, I . , .
I:l J~ h i~ J' ~~ : Ill" I J J ,I. :E Z :
Z ',j J ~ ~~ '';j i~ : , l. II! ~: ~ ~ ;
.' ,1 lJ~" 1~ - 1111 ' ! 0::;.
":- .-'- 1'" lilli" I, '"I'~'" .J 1
.j .. i ' J ..' "JI . '" .j ~I _ tJJ _ ,
'\"'. .., ~,'" 11111 1- > U) I
ui :1 ~ n- l~ .',j ~ . w..J ~
,Ji :1 j(;j J: I.-I,. '11 if j ; 0" '
,J'''' vI> T.. I' " . '" (I) I: I
~ - . -. - ,,(\ " I
-' ~ ~ . .. 'r'-. r" ,J,I.I,[.I.). ' : ~ L.. .J J ~ ~ !
-.. - -.--.. -l ~ ~.( LU Cl ~
~ ~ ~ ; l-- ([] ex: .
, ~~"'~J~ ~<"l::1
3nN3^'ot N01~,N'X31: '; ~' l>- !
,
,
I ( '. - .'. , ,- ..
_.:<0 ,j -,. . . ' I""J."J
'ii, "I. (:1 L(. :;1;; '." 0 , G _'._
:m m ij1 . :!;~;:; :; );11 i 1]\ ~ij: .'
'.;~i ',l. :,d ~~ ~i!!] .: ~1:J : '~~~ P1'
't ~ ~ t .. , ,.,' ., .... r ", ., J
L .1., ...... j""., ...,' , 5., ,,,'
, ,- -', .. :, .' _.1_____.; .;. q _,."_-+
'.. tJ (,\: I I' I ~ I (") I
(~. ,,-- ! , /~1... j G ,:) Gl ,~-:) 1____._, )'
\ ',: i "-- '..--/ 'i;' '- ~ .. : '
J '; I I i I I I II. I ! I. I I I ' ,__
I 'c\ rj]ll t IfTI T TI~:::rtlf'J 11 r in t II~IT r' I-[flj
---~7~"~'~ "-----,,,,,,,. :~:~;"""'j"""7;';""'~""" r",,,,,, --~-:c,~......-... , / 0'
,.J I .. l I ' I I ~,~_ '%' I r I' "" I ! I I '.;
--'~ ';~~111~'~LL~t~~tU~~U1Uh~~r~l~~1 co, t/Y
. ~ r~,.- ["'" .1....~~~.c:l--.,c~.,=1 ~~o.-,=",,~-A (--.:\ W
/ -'~I l. ~-:,----"R- . '~~~-f~~ (fIT'.;;.'.:-4 ;f~'~~~. _f~~;.:';'''':~rl-~''{"l~~~ . t:....~~.: ,~I"-_____ J
jl. 'P. .. ("" f"~IC--PIIT' .. dltUll~liliUli1L;:1D\, '1F!,,,Jh['Lll~7.1 ii\._
.,0 II ".,ill~1 ! I, I I y~ ~ I~ '1
I I;) (~., I
o ,I I ':IJ ~ ~ ~ .1 . ~
: J~.' l' ~ :1 ~.J ~ ~ ~
;' -j .. , ; ~ u' .'":'
r: "j' Z
( ~i - __~ <{
,: -1
~~ '. t.:l
~._~~------ 2 a..
" ~ ~. ' w
~ ~ =', l-
~- m _
~ ~
- Z I
:=1 g
<! ----
'ei ----
'~ :--~.L____,_-_____,__,__--~~ __ ~ ~--
~ \ ,- ----- . I I I J..)
:J .: I I ,:.
.. r
" ., DC)
, ,-
.. . " {~' ~'l
I ,1 -/" --1
· I...,;; I' I"'JJ';'
-- " ~ "I t! 'V' .
/ .~ ,j f)-,~J:z-r ---.....'--- .1 :::1'
/ ,)~
'. I I I I ~.. \ '.', \ \ 1.1 iLu JJu~-'diJLi ~L
L:'. / ,.1__..
. . .
- , I I ! , -- !..-- , .
,
.,
G
\I'
~ ~! ~nu,
~ t~ ~~~-' I
,
'l- i1 I ~<!i!
, ~~ ' i.~~~
-
.' ~~ ~
-0 "L
1- .~
.1
I i I"
~-!---_._.. - . ...----.-.---.-..-----..-- ..n___.._"' . _....~_
G -_.._..--_._-~~...-.
1 , ,~i In !:
l' , I
:11 i ' , 4r ;
, ! ~ I , t!' ifl ~
, I
, ' i ~ l-~ !
, I
,. .\ . , i 1 'i ' "
: ifi: ' ' ~" -' I
i ~' , i' jI ~
: I I
! 3h 'I ')1 i I
i fr , in! i ,
,
,
, ' I
! .,. ! i i
, :, ~~ .:: , !
! I i 1 I I
,
I , i
, , I I
I I
, I
, ,
,. . . --. ,.--.-----.-- --.---"---- -"_.._--_._------~--_.__.._-- ,
e . ..._...._._______~.:...__:.~:_._ _. ~,_____.___..__ _.__~__ ." 1.__
. ..IA~' 't !
I , I I I
, I , (
i : I I" I ,
L, " !
~ ! I
i -- ----- I
'f I i
.
l~i i ~fl I I ,
i ; ~. ~~i 1 M~ -
I
· ~1: -lI ,
,~~ I ~ , ! l~ Jk~ W ' ~~
l>l'lI S :I~~
~! f ~~ i . I ~~ !
~ ~j I "!'1 i
! I i l'~ ,I,
'j' I - .--
- '1 'I I ' ,-,I.. . '_._.-._._--'--~'" .
I "i
i ,II
.
! ! . i
! I
,
I ,
I i
, \
I
!
i i
, I
,
I
I I
, '
I
.
IIi tf r . m~{i li~ I r:g ~[lJJu(Q) ~(Q)[QYV/
~il iH'H ~ }F
~ll'
~ Ir I !mr ,I ! ,~ !& @~~@~
~ r !':j' II i "
~ i~ll ~ L'.! ARDEN HILLS, MN.
~ ~ -i it ~ ' Z
iu~
----- - -- ---
. .
.
__u_ _ I' .,
.
! ' 1 I I, ,
.,-'-0- r w~ .
e "~!J
.-0 8 -'1"* r
~
,~ []J ~ ,.
111 {)
r ,~
Il ,: ..
~ I, , ..
"" - - ,
-'-1 . r
[ , , t
I' ,
I!' ~ ,
, IP@ . I
I " ~.:. I
=:J ~_ I
); ~~@ . ~t~ .
.- ~, ~~ { II
,- lH~ ~. @:V <:> .
11.;' f@A.l@) , ~ ~ I
it ' ~ , '~~ !
~ .
u ' +- <"
~ ;
I
!
., '~ !
: '
,- ,
~. I I
'"
-v ,
! ..
-- . " . ---..~- \
-- r! .
: i I- L !
i. _n.. :j"' i- :-
, , ' i
' , I' II I
: ' ! ! ill
, , "
I' I , ! : ': i +
0' \ ! ! I I, i ;
Il' : . ' "
I " i
. r: ' i 1 'I' 1\
, i; Ii :
1\':---:" _n__ _
,""' I , - . ._-~ , I
.-t \ ,Iti 't~:m ! .a ' !
, lL
1\1: ' i I , 1
" , ,
~~ I~II I ! 1- ,
'~i I ,
q :
\:11 :rIl' . , L "
l'; I 'i' ..~_.- ' I
I'; " -- ! '
" I I ' ,I i I ~ \
, ,
...-.. . -' I ~ i'
':>:'=' I
-, -... ! ~ ,
.. --' ~' . --- ,- \
- ,
13: ." I
. ' ------ -- c ~--' I'
1 I ~ I '
, , I ' ; i
, I , I ~o i I
I I ' 1 -- I '
f " I
;-1-- - , I ' I'
, I ' II I
, - ...
I ~ I,
, ,'I' 'I
I,
I ! ,
I -....-
J - ! 1 ~ "
.-
i I
I' I
I
, , ,- I
I Go '
I
---- I !'
- .u.___._ ...._
I .... .-...
, -- - .
, .....
I .....-...
~ I'
\
.. I
. \ ~ I
.- I
I , () ,
~ .
I:
- ..
,
i I ...___ I
, I
l
4d-d
ii' ..----.... .' I
~ ~!l!l ~lU)u@
~ i hi if ~ en ~(QJ[Q)W
U i ~ ....' .~ @JlL&~~
~ ~ r nUl ~ ".~.
'\ ih~l ~,_ 'Z ARDEN HILLS, MN..
. MINl1I'FS
CI'lY OF ARDEN mLLS, MINNE:SarA
PLANNJ:N; c.'CMfiSSICN MEE'l'IN3
wmm:sIlAY, APRIL 20, 1994
7:30 P.M. - NEW BRIGEn'CN CI'lY Hl\LL
CALL TO rnm=
Chair Winiecki called the meeting to order at 7:30 p,m.
ROLL CALL
Present were: Chair Winiecki, Barb PiotJ:'O\!.lSki, Dave Carlson, Steve
Erickson, Ray McGraw, Marty Rye; Councilrrember Hicks; Brian Fritsinger,
Ccmm.mity Plarming Coordinator; Tanmy Olson, Recording Secret~,
Absent was Scott Petersen.
APPROVE MINllTES
Carlson rroved, seconded by Erickson, to approve the March 2, 1994
minutes, The rrotion passed unanirrously, (6-0) ,
.
CASE #94-01 - tlNITED PROI:'=~' ."" - SITE PLAN REVIEM
Mr, Fritsinger stated the applicant is proposing three new or relocated
signs for the Arden Plaza Center. This plan was originally reviewed in
1975, The original site plan included tw:J area identification signs,
one located on County Road E and one located on Lexington Avenue. For
the last year, the plaza has had only one identification sign, The
ordinance allows 2 signs.
The setback requirements are 15 feet along County Road E and 20 feet
along Lexington Avenue. The existing sign along Lexington Avenue is 81
square feet and 16 feet high and the proposed sign along County Road E
is 88 square feet and 16 feet high, Both of these are in ccxrpliance
with the Ordinance. Along County Road E, the directional sign is
proposed at 9 square feet and 6 feet in height,
All three of the signs w:Juld be internally illuminated with no external
illumination or flashing lights.
.
----
------- ---- -------- ---
Planning Minutes Page 2 04/20/94 .
Mt". Fritsinger stated the sign ccrnpany chose this type of sign to
advertise the rrajor tenants and available parking because of the larger
catplex's need for rrore inforrration al:x:lut the rrajor tenants and
available parking, The sign contractor has stated the traffic levels
and speed along County Road E require three inch copy for the sign to be
seen by rrotorists,
The directional sign does identify the parking lot which is set back
from the intersection, in tw:n, 1TI3ki.ng it harder to see. Staff thought
the variance request wasn't significant and 1t.UUld not prove detrirrental
to the area. In researching this case, Mr, Fritsinger found no
precedent for allowing a variance. Staff recanrends approving the
prq;:osed amenclrrents,
Chair Winiecki asked for CCilT'lreIlts fran the Planning Corrmission.
Mt", Piirainen, the tenant, stated the recent history of the building has
been p::or, Since the parking lot is hard to see and the speed of the
passing cars is high, Mr, piirainen chose this type of sign for the
building, .
Chair Winiecki found only one sign, Carrol's Ft.u:ni.ture, which carre close
to the ordinance requirerrents, The others were all larger, The height
of the legs are to te 3 feet high, but she thought they should te higher
since the area of the exit is difficult to see,
Chair Winiecki further stated a rrore appropriate placing would te in the
lx:>ulevard of the plaza; although, this wouldn't te possible tecause of
snow plowing and limited visibility. She entrusted Mt". Fritsinger to
work with the tenant.
Mt", McGraw complirrented the tenant of the building for changing the l=k
of the area. He further stated if a sign will help keep tenants in the
building, he was all for the sign. Mr. McGraw explained when a tenant's
business succeeds, the City also benefits,
Ms, piotrowski thought the sign looked gcxxi, but the parking sign should
contain fewer words.
Chair Winiecki stated the small l~ foot signs should te rerroved,
.
. Planning Minutes Page 3 04/20/94
Mr. Piirainen explained he was the tenant and not the landlord. He has
cannitted his rroney for the work and wants signage that will benefit the
clinic. He thought a gcx:d medical clinic would allow the facility to be
further developed,
Mr, Fritsinger had talked to the building's owner, and the leasing
inforrration would be incorp:lrated on the sign, The "For lease" signs
will then be rerroved,
Mr. Erickson asked if the new signage would take the place of the other
miscellaneous signs. The plaza is still called Arden Plaza, and the
medical clinic exists within the ccmplex. The rrost irrportant
inforrration to a custorrer is where the entrance is, If the sign only
had three words "Arden Plaza Entrance", the lettering could be larger.
Mr. Carlson asked Mr, Fritsinger why a variance for the sign was needed.
Mr. Fritsinger explained the prop:Jsed square f=tage is 3 square feet
larger and 2 feet higher than allowed.
. Mr. Fritsinger explained the ordinance states a sign must not be larger
than 6 square feet, although, other signs along County Road E are all
larger,
Mr. Carlson stated the larger sign was placed before the Sign Ordinance
was rewritten.
Chair Winiecki rerrernbered a previous case where the Arden/Shoreview
Animal Hospital sign was approved after the clinic was opened,
Mr, Carlson asked if the rest of the rrall becares developed, would the
other applicants also be able to advertise on the prop::lsed sign,
Mr, Fritsinger stated the intent was to include other applicants on the
area identification signs,
Mr, McGraw asked since the property has only one owner, Lutheran
Brotherhcxxl., will the Corrmission have to grant variances later for rrore
signage to other tenants.
Mr, piirainen stated the area identification sign will have 4 spaces for
. other tenants in the building. If later there are rrore tenants. the
--.-
-..----
Plarming Minutes Page 4 04/20/94 .
sign can be redesigned within the frame to include everyone,
Chair Winiecki asked how the 3' x 3' size sign was decided upon.
Mr. Piirainen stated it was a formula used by sign carpanies, along with
other clinics, to determine what size a sign should be.
Chair Winiecki thought it was a busy sign. and the building sign was
highly visible.
Mr, Piirainen stated the landlord wanted separate identification for the
medical clinic and the retail section of the plaza,
Chair Winiecki stated an arraN =uld serve the pu:rp:>se. If this one
tenant takes up the whole allowance for signage, other tenants =uld
find a problem with their lack of signage.
Mr. Erickson stated if one f=t were rerroved fran the sign, it =uld be
in ccmpliance.
Chair Winiecki stated the main objective of the sign is for people to be .
able to find the plaza and know where to turn into the lot,
Mr. Carlson thought t= parking signs =u1d be redundant and confusing
for customers,
Chair Winiecki asked the applicant to reduce the size of the sign to
enable other tenants to have signage possibilities.
Mr. Piirainen thought the elimination of the extra parking sign was
acceptable.
piotrowski rrotioned, seconded by Carlson, to deny the request for
the sign variance and for the tenant to reduce the height and
square f=tage of the sign. The rrotion passed unanirrousl y, (6-0)
Chair Winiecki stated the issue should be brought before Council at the
next meeting.
Mr, piirainen stated he =uld =rk with the sign corrpany on the issue,
.
. Planning Minutes Page 5 04/20/94
CASE #94-04 - MCCLtN; FClURlH AIDrrICN
Mr, Fritsinger noted the changes to the preliminary plat made by the
applicant. After the public hearing was held and closed on Ma=h 2,
1994, the applicant then prepared the additional inforrmtion the
Planning Ccmnission requested. The lot lines were altered making the
lots in carpliance with City Ordinances.
Mr. Fritsinger stated the specific areas changed were the lot setbacks
and the lot sizes. Now, all lots rreet the 95 f=t setback requirement,
A 10 f=t drainage and utility easerrent has now been identified, The
grading plan now includes silt fencing along the back side of the lots
and has addressed erosion factors, The primary fill, which w:JUld take
place at the time of house building, will involve lots 1- 5 . In the area
of wetland delineation, neighbors had been interested in run-off and
drainage . The engineer stated the street will be the main drainage
area and will carry run-off into the stonn water sewers,
Mr. Fritsinger further stated the wetland delineation area had been
. identified and the engineer working with Mr. McClung stated the revised
delineation is fairly close to the location of the original delineation
on the maps provided :oy Mr, McClung. The drainage to be filled on lot 4
was a =nce:m to the Planning Ccmnission. Mr, McClung's engineer stated
it was difficult to determine the exact encroachment of the wetland area
onto this lot, but Rice Creek Watershed District would review and
investigate further,
Mr, Fritsinger stated after reviewing the changes in the plat, Mr.
McClung had addressed all the issues the Planning Ccmnission had asked
for. Staff recorrmends approving the plans,
Chair Winiecki asked the residents to voice any canrents they had.
Chair Winiecki acknowledged l:oth Patricia Holt and Kathleen Flanagan's
letters.
Kathleen Flanagan of 1511 Colleen Avenue stated her conceI11 was the
drainage problem, She questioned if the proposed drainage plan is
guaranteed to work because there is a lot of drainage on her lot.
Mr. Fritsinger stated with the elevation of the lot the water w:JUld run
. off into the street and then da.om the road, The road will actually
---
Planning Minutes Page 6 04/20/94 .
eliminate much of the current runoff on her property nt::M, The engineers
utilized by Mr. McClung and hired by the City are professionals, and to
the best of their judgerrent have detennined that the runoff will be
reduced,
Chair Winiecki stated the developer lTRlSt address drainage, but Mr,
McClung is not responsible to fix the elevation problems on Ms.
Flanagan's lot,
Mary Hoyme of 1531 McClung Drive stated the drainage ditch behind her
barre needs to be cleaned and kept flowing. Their lot receives a large
percentage of the runoff from that ditch.
Mr. Fritsinger stated the City's Public Works Superintendent, Dan
Winkel, is aware of the ditch's condition and has been I-..c>rking on plans
to have the ditch cleaned.
Lynette Kreidler of 1518 Arden Vista Court asked about park dedication
funds ,
Mr. Fritsinger quoted Cindy Severtson, Parks Director, as saying the .
land offered by Mr, McClung was acceptable for the construction of the
trail. This proposal was previously reviewed by the Parks Ccrrmittee and
the City Council. Both found the offer acceptable,
Mike Welsch of 1509 Colleen Avenue asked to see the new grading plan.
Mr. Fritsinger stated the steep grades on sare of the lots will be an
architectural challenge, but any cut and fill on lots six through nine
will not take place until after the houses are plarmed.
Mr, McClung stated the challenge can be met by the developer,
Chair Winiecki asked for comnents from the Planning Ccmnission,
l\tr. Erickson thanked Mr, McClung for the great job of documentation and
intent of the development. All of the issues addressed by the Planning
Carrnission were addressed in the updated plans, Mr, Erickson was
pleased and satisfied,
Mr, Rye asked for these plans to be the standard and not the exception, .
Mr, Rye further stated he visited the proposed developrnent ap.d lot 4
. Planning Minutes Page 7 04/20/94
does encroach upon the wetland.
Mr. McClung stated the standard on addition number three was that no
blocks were allowed to be shown except the 6 inches above the sod. Mr.
McClung stated this standard'M:lUld apply to the fourth addition as well.
Mr. Rye stated the City shouldn't develop houses on the wetland line.
He further stated if this infomation isn't demanded up front, problems
with wet lots and people wanting the lots fixed will occur later. He
feels lot four still has rrore problems.
Chair Winiecki asked if granting a variance to protect the wetland w:JUld
be helpful when the lots are developed.
Mr. Rye stated either a variance will need to be granted or a srraller
heme will be built.
Chair Winiecki thought the Planning Crnmission wasn' t responsible for
building the hcmes.
. Mr. Fritsinger explained Rice Creek Watershed District would need to
finalize the plans.
Mr. Erickson asked what was the square f=tage of land on lot 4. He
further stated as long as the lots net the requirerrents, the Planning
Ccmnission w:JUld need to accept the lots and deal with the issues when
the houses are built.
Mr. Erickson stated the f=tprint shows alrrost a double setback. He
thcught a little different configuration to the proposed bane pad would
be better.
Carlson rrotioned, seconded by Erickson to approved Case #94-04 and
follow the reccmnendations provided by staff and Rice Creek
Watershed District. The rrotion carried 5-l. (Winiecki,
Piotrowski, Carlsen, Erickson, McGraw voted in favor; Mr. Rye
opposed. )
GOALS FOR 1994/1995
. Mr. Fritsinger stated the City Cotmcil wanted to rreet with the various
------..---- - --------- --
Planning Minutes Page 8 04/20/94 .
ccmnittees to discuss goals and plans for 1994. This open discussion is
for the Planing Corrmission Members to voice their plans or concerns.
Mr. Erickson thought a major issue was redefining the canprehensive plan
for the TCI\AP property.
Chair Winiecki stated the mission statement was clearly defined; the
Planning Cornnission helds orderly developrrent within the ordinances.
Chair Winiecki stated one goal would be the TCAAP developrrent. The
Planning Corrmission supports business, particularly these located in
downtown Arden Hills and the Gateway Business District.
Mr. McGraw theught one idea 'M:lUld be to explain the Crnmission and its
purpose to the visitors and applicants whe attend meetings. People
sheuld understand the Corrmission is an advisery Ccmnission to the City
Council and is responsible to work within the guidelines and pararreters
of City Ordinances. He further stated the Crnmission should take action
on future visions for the City and not wait for plans to CCX1E to the
Cornnission. These are the specific duties and responsibilities of the .
Ccmnission. He stated rrembers need to attend the rreetings regularly.
Mr. McGraw thought the Cotmcil sheuld keep the Comnission rrore inforrred
about what issues are being discussed within the Cotmcil.
He wanted to see sherter Planning Crnmission rreetings with rrore frequent:
scheduling. If there are rrore than 4 items on the agenda, there should
be another rreeting scheduled.
Mr. McGraw asked the Planning Crnmission to react to the changing
situations within the City to rreet the economies and help keep
businesses here in Arden Hills.
Chair Winiecki read the Planning Crnrnission mission statement frcm the
City of Apple Valley. She theught reccmrendations for annual goals
should be set. Chair Winiecki asked Mr. Fritsinger to review Apple
Valley's Statement.
Chair Winiecki stated Mr. Erickson and Mr. McGraw will Co-Chair the
TCI\AP ccmmittee and help rrenage the TCAAP planning sessions.
Mr. Rye asked the status of the develq:ment of Lexington Avenue north of .
----- --------- -- --
. Planning Minutes Page 9 04/20/94
County Road E. He asked which areas are the priority and sheuld have
the Planning Crnmission's primary attention.
Mr. Fritsinger stated the Strategic Planning Meeting, to establish
primary goals and how they fit into the City's goals, is set for May 2.
He mentioned storm water rrenagement needs to be addressed within the
next year and the oanprehensive plan arrended to incorporate the changes.
Mr. Carlson asked the possibility of implernenting a plan with the Coilllty
to turn Coilllty Road F to the City without having to incur all of the
repaving oosts.
Mr. Fritsinger stated he spoke with Dan Winkel, and the City wants the
County to upgrade the road. The Coilllty'S current plan is to overlay the
road and turn the road over to the City.
Councilrrember Hicks stated discussions to turn over the road, in
reasonable condition for the City to maintain the road at minimum cost,
are in progress between the City and Ramsey Coilllty. The Coilllty is
. interested in turning over scxre of the roads to the City as part of a
trade off.
RICE CFJ;!I;!I( WATERSHED DISTRIcr
Brian Fritsinger explained the process and purpose of Rice Creek
Watershed District and its relationship within the City. Typically
cities canplete a concept review prior to taking any formal action and
then send it to Rice Creek Watershed District for review. The plans
would then care back to the City including any ccmrents f=n Rice Creek
Watershed District. Mr. Fritsinger stated the City has no fomal
concept review plan.
Mr. Fritsinger stated in going through old case files, the City Council
has typically reviewed the plans before Rice Creek Watershed District
and any approval by the City Coilllcil has been made contingent upon Rice
Creek Watershed District's review and approval. In the future staff
will require an applicant to sul:mit its plans to Rice Cree Watershed
District before a review by the Planning Crnmission.
Chair Winiecki asked if in this process Rice Creek Watershed District
would find a problem, how w:JUld the City respond.
.
-------
Planning Minutes Page 10 04/20/94 .
Mr. Fritsinger stated he receives a Sl.lITI1\3IY of all Arden Hills cases
Rice Creek Watershed District has reviewed. Staff needs to be sure to
review these reports and follow up on any problems identified by Rice
Cree.': . No major problems have occurred since be has been with the City.
One of the difficulties is that Rice Creek Watershed District does not
visually review plans until the construction plans are available and
this could be several rronths after any approval by the City.
Mr. Rye stated the worst case scenario 'M:lUld be to approve lots that
were unable to be built on.
Mr. Carlson thought the reccmnendation, to have staff first review
plans, then all other agencies and finally the Planning Crnmission
before they are submitted to the City Council, was a gocd idea.
Mr. Fritsinger stated the Water Management Plan identifies Rice Creek
Watershed District as the agent to handle wetlands; although, the City
has never formalized this plan. Mr. Fritsinger suggested this
formalization take place in the near future.
C01JNCIL REPORI' .
Councilmember Hicks stated the Council agendas have been relati vel y
light, the final TCI\AP rreeting is Thursday. This is the major issue the
Coilllcil has been working on lately.
Councilmember Hicks stated the business retention surveys have been se.."1t
and returned. A Sl.lITI1\3IY is in the process and no major objections f=n
the business carmunity have been expressed.
Mr. Erickson asked about the potential to change the speed limits and
speed limit hours on Lake Johanna.
Councilmember Hicks stated Coilllcil is open to discussions, and to date,
limited discussions have been held. COilllcilrrember Probst raised the
question at the worksession and Coilllcilmember Probst would lock into the
issues.
Chair Winiecki stated the May rreeting will be Scott Petersen's last
meeting. He has resigned.
.
. Planning Minutes Page 11 04/20/94
Mr. Fritsinger stated the business surveys have care back positive;
altheugh, signage issues have been raised.
Mr. Fritsinger stated Ryder Student Transportation rret with Mr. Carlson
and himself. The rreeting was positive and scxre issues of concern were
resolved. Ryder has sent a draft to their attorneys for review, while
waiting for the bid f=n M:Junds view School District. They are
canpleting serre additional landscapinng plans and Ryder is awaiting
review by the Planning Crnmission on the Jillle agenda.
Chair Winiecki asked for volilllteers to rreet with the Council. She then
stated Mr. Fritsinger could speak on behalf of the Planning Crnmission
since he t=k notes and it will be in the minutes.
Erickson rroved, seconded by McGraw, to adjourn the rreeting at 9 :45
p.m. The rrotion passed tmanimousl y. (6-0) .
.
.
"
. CITY OF ARDEN HILlS
~
DATE: January 31, 1994
TO: Dorothy Person, City jlAmi."i strater
FRCM: Dan Winkel, Public Works $uperlnteDdent
SUBJECl': Change on Resolution 94-13
Upon further review of the Feasibility Study the estimated 1994 Pavement
Maintenance Costs shculd be $394,800 rather than $391,200 due to a
higher =st than earlier estimated of recycling on Keithson Road.
Resolution 94-13 has been arrended to reflect these changes. This number
is an estimated total proj ect .
rw:to
.
.
... ,
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
. RESOLUTION NO. 94-13
A RESOLUTION RECEIVING THE FEASIBILITY
REPORT AND ORDERING A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE
IMPROVEMENT IN THE MATTER OF THE 1994
PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
WHEREAS, the Feasibility Report ordered by the Council in
Resolution 93-59 has been prepared with reference to
the 1994 Pavement Maintenance Improvement and was
received by the City on January 31, 1994; and
WHEREAS, the Feasibility Report recommends that the proposed
improvement is feasible;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Arden Hills, Minnesota:
1. The City Council will consider the 1994 Pavement
Maintenance Improvement as described in'the Feasibility
Report and the assessment of the properties abutting this
proposed improvement for all or a portion of the cost of
the Improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429
at an estimated cost for the improvement of $394,800.
. 2. A public hearing shall be held before the City Council on
the proposed improvement on the 28th day of February, 1994
at 7:30 O'clock p.m. at New Brighton City Hall.
3. The City Administrator shall provide ten days mailed notice
and two weeks published notice on the hearing as required
by law.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN
HILLS THIS 31ST DAY OF JANUARY, 1994.
THOMAS R. SATHER, MAYOR
ATTEST:
DOROTHY A. PERSON, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
.
.
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
. RESOLUTION NO. 94-13
A RESOLUTION RECEIVING THE FEASIBILITY
REPORT AND ORDERING A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE
IMPROVEMENT IN THE MATTER OF THE 1994
PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
WHEREAS, the Feasibility Report ordered by the Council in
Resolution 93-59 has been prepared with reference to
the 1994 Pavement Maintenance Improvement and was
received by the City on January 31, 1994; and
WHEREAS, the Feasibility Report recommends that the proposed
improvement is feasible;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Arden Hills, Minnesota:
1. The City Council will consider the 1994 Pavement
Maintenance Improvement as described in the Feasibility
Report and the assessment of the properties abutting this
proposed improvement for all or a portion of the cost of
the Improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429
at an estimated cost for the improvement of $394,800.
. 2. A public hearing shall be held before the City council on
the proposed improvement on the 14th day of March, 1994 at
7:30 o'clock p.m. at New Brighton City Hall.
3 . The City Administrator shall provide ten days mailed notice
and two weeks published notice on the hearing as required
by law.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN
HILLS THIS 31ST DAY OF JANUARY, 1994.
THOMAS R. SATHER, MAYOR
ATTEST:
DOROTHY A. PERSON, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
.
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
. RESOLUTION NO. 94-14
A RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS IN THE MATTER
OF THE 1994 PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS
WHEREAS, the City Council has duly considered the Feasibility
Report presented at the January 31st, 1994, City
Council Meeting, and;
WHEREAS, a public hearing has been scheduled for February 28,
1994, to solicit public input;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Arden Hills, Minnesota:
1. Maier Stewart and Associates, Inc. is hereby designated as
Project Engineer for this improvement. The Project
Engineer is directed to prepare plans and specifications
for the making of the improvement and the solicitation of
competitive bids.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN
HILLS THIS 31ST DAY OF JANUARY, 1994.
. THOMAS R. SATHER, MAYOR
ATTEST:
DOROTHY A. PERSON, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
.
~---
. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 94-17
A RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF THE APPLICATION FOR A
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) BY NORTHWEST
YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES (NYFS)
WHEREAS, NYFS has provided essential developmental services for
the youth and families of Arden Hills since 1976, and
WHEREAS, NYFS is finding more and more people in need of
financial assistance in order to make use of NYFS' mental health
programs, and
WHEREAS, the unique partnership between NYFS and its ten Ramsey
County member cities has resulted in the ability to provide an
essential community service that none of the cities could provide
individually, and
WHEREAS, NYFS is in need of assistance in purchasing a building
in which to house these essential community services,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the city Council of the City
of Arden Hills enthusiastically supports the award of a 1994 CDBG
. to NYFS.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
THIS 31ST DAY OF JANUARY, 1994.
THOMAS R. SATHER, MAYOR
ATTEST:
DOROTHY A. PERSON, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
.
. CITY OF 1lRDEN HILLS
MEHJRANOOM
Dl\!rE : January 31, 1994
TO: Mayor and City Council
FRCM: Dorothy A. Person, city 1ldmini.strator
SUBJECT: eorrections to January 28, 1994 1ldmini.strator .... ....""'its
A couple of =rrections should be noted to the January 28, 1994 memo for
tonight I s Council meeting:
L Under "Consent Calendar" (1st page), last line, Council has not
given previous approval to the Pay Equity study. '!his line was inteOOed
for #d Section 125/Flexible Spending A=unt, and therefore should be
C'lMM to Item #d.
2. Under "Finance" (2nd page) - the 1992 water purchase total should be
366,450.
'll1ank you.
. DAP:rk
.
--- --
-----------
ICf1~
. LMCIT EXCESS LIABILITY COVERAGE
Cities obtaining excess coverage from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust
must decide whether or not to waive the statutory liability limits to the extent of the
excess coverage purchased. TIlls decision must be made by the city council. CITIES
PURCHASING EXCESS COVERAGE MUST COMPLE1E AND RE11JRN TIllS
FORM TO IMCIT BEFORE THE EFFECITVE DATE OF THE COVERAGE.
For further information, refer to the accompanying memo. City officials may also want
to discuss these issues with the city attorney.
The City of A.i\1)~~ ).\.., t........';:> accepts excess liability coverage
limits of S 'I 1& "" . G 06 6 - from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust.
Check one:
_ The city DOES NOT WAIVE the monetary limits on tort liability established by
Minnesota Statutes 466.04.
. - OR-
_ The city WAIVES the monetary limits on tort liability established by Minnesota
Statutes 466.04, to the extent of the limits of the excess liability coverage obtained
from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust.
Date of city council meeting: X
Signature: '{
Position: '"
Return this completed form to Berkley Risk Services, 920 Second Avenue South, Suite
700, Minneapolis, MN 55402-4023.
. 4/92
IMeIT31 (2)
---
. 1
e '"
.~.::
.., ~>
0.....
"'''
,,~
.
...
~ ~ ~ 01 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
- "'~
" Q 0 0 0 0 0
>-
" .. I
~
'" :;j
c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~ ~ ~
.,>
... ~Q~ M
Q
0.. :>: '" '" '" '" '" '"
" "... '"
'" >- ,
M .",
JJ '"
M '"
....
,,- '"
>-~ e >-~ ~ _ _ . 0 HI < '" NIN
~ '" >- Q~
......'" .=:5 '-.:t 0 r- \0 0 If') ll') '" ""," ~.Oi Z
Q '" o N M M L..t'i I..I"'\)....-l "" ~!~ " '" '"
Q >-" . e c--? c--7 ~ c-? ~ ~~ ~ . . . . \ . e .
~~~ '" Q "" "" "" C'it..jr Q
~'" x: x: ';
e~ ... ,
'" e iR- ..... ..... 11"1'- 11"1'- ...... ~ tA- ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ~ '"
o >- " "-
~e~ ..,
... ... ~I !1
"''''Q J 001 J ",I ~I ~ ~
> Q .;:: ~
e Q~ " ..;
0.,> e >-~ 0
" >- '" - N '" " ~
z "'- g:C r- "" ~ '" ~ 00 ~, ql 00 "" '"
0 o~ 0.. ~ ......... If) ~ " " 00 ~ ~l '" '" ... "
....rO.... " e . .-:1 Q ...
'" ...~ .~ Q . . . . . ~I 0 ...
'" - "'''' - - - - _I N N N >- ~
e '" Q ...
"" e ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... e
Q - '"
.. ..,
~ "
~ <: ""I 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ '" U
-Q ~
"'~ ~ '"
0 >< ..... '" '"
~ '" ...> ~ '"
"
~ ,... ... L ~ eo N "" "" "" ~ - "
0 e... '" '" '" '" '" '" " 00 .c .,;
.. '" QO 0 e
. 0 "" u~ ~
"" " ..,
"" '" -
~
'" ~ Q
I , , ~ '"
c e '" : "j ~
,..,
0 M '" '" '" ;:;: '" ::E: '" ::E: ::E: '" - -;;;
.. C ..0.. ..
... "" _ >-
'" .. u_ ... e
0.. Q "
- ~ "
~ ~
~ " " e
.. " ~ J ~ " '"
~ e 0 .. u
" Q .. 0..
0 ~ ...~ ~ '"
u "- u ..'" '"
'" e _ N - 0 - 0 - - - 0 0 0 ~ N
e .. 0
Q'" - .
z -;;; ..
"
0
Q
~ J ~ .,>
0 ..
.., -
...'" '" "
'" ..~ 0 0 0 M 0 '" - 0 0 0 - - - .., '"
.c.. ..
ex: " ..
Q " ..
z >-
~ 0
.. Q.
'" e e
0 ... ...
0
,... ~ ~ -;
< ,... 0
z z ~ ,,-
H '" .. .~c
~ '" CO CO ~ e oc
~ " >-
~ u '" Z e --
< z 0 '" ~ ~
,... '" < 0 ,... 0 ... MM
'" ..., Z Z () Z .. "''''
~ 0.. "''''
N '" U '" H '" " NN
- :<: () ,... '" "" '" c , J
- '" '" '" "" z '" 0 z '" 0.. "'...
'" '" '" '" U Z H '" '" H "" 0 .; """
" NN
..., "" '" ..., Z H ~ 0 H Z :=> x
..., -'" < () '" <: ,... '" > z '" '" -;;; e --
H e > Z Z '" < 0 '" .. NN
'" o >< Z ,... '" H '" '" '" '" '" ..., ,... '" 0 e ~
-<: ::E: '" ,... ,... ,... 0 ~ ~ "" "" () ~ ,... 0 ... "''''
~:< -
z 0.. H <: ;:1 z () '" ,... '" ;:1 .,> ~
. '" -'" . .~ Z H H () 0 0 '" >< z '" 0 .. -
CO ..,"" ",,,, 0 "" ,... ~ <. :< :< ,... < H :< ,... .., -;;;
'" "H ..., H OJ '" ~ H ,... CO '" .., ..
<: "[ == ..., .; ,... ~ H '" () u Z Z () H .. ... U
Q H ~ ~~ Z '" 0 H H '" '" '" H Z ..
'" ,.., '" .. '" H ~ H ..., ..., "" ~ 0 ~ ..., H x ..
0 ~:< ~ ,... ::E: z '" '" 0 () '" ::E: 2 0 ..
~ z'" .. e
00 ~ Z CO < OJ '" '" '" () < '" ~ Q 0..
>< .. '" H < "" '" 0. "" "" () < 0. "" '" " e
,... ..'" ... "" >- ~ ... ~ 0
H e", .., '" .. .. " .. "
U ~- .., <: ,..; " .,> " "-
< u a ..; Q - N .,. '" '" ;;: .. Q '"
- - - - N M .,. '" '" ... '" - - - - - - - '" Cr '"
.
CIl
W
~ @ @@ @ ...J @
Z CJ) CJ) en (f) ~ CIl
WOO 0 0 0
~ '* '* '*~ ,*0- ,*0- '*~ '*W ,*a.
w ~ ~ ~ ~W ~ ~~ m~ ~~ ~OC ~> ~~
~ ~ N N ~O N N~ N~ N~ N~ NO N~
Z
<( CIl_
Z W ~
~ ~ ~ '"
~~ z ~5 +
~ ~. 0 - ~<( 0
::: ~~!:l ~~~ w ~~ ~CIl ~ W ~
WCIlZ Id,.,; cDaj.,; S V~...J 5Q N S Cl .,;
_ ClN..- .....-..... ..... I~ - Z ~
Cl ::: ~ 0 I --- I - <0 - I
<~ ~N V l8~~ ~ ~wz '*8 ~ ~ 0 ~ '"
;::~ <O~ '" v~~ ~ <0 <0' 0 ~ Z V <0
~ "'~ N mri~ 0 ~w ~N - 0 W N V
..... ~=..... ~~~ 2 .....~ NW ~ Z ~ ..........
~~ ~~8 -
I <0. ~ . . . "'~
C\lv .....~~ ~ mO
.......... 8 -~~ ~ m ~ ~~ ~
CIl'" I I. ~F;:: . Iii' . ~ ~- .
. W~ ~~ <0 CIl.n V Q ~ I I <0
C!J ~ ..... 0 "I -"" 'I ~ I 0; ~ I
<~ ~~ 8 ~~~ <0 > V ~.,; ~~ <0 ~
~~ ~I~ ~~~ ~ > ~ ........... ..... ~
:> en ..... . . . ~ . 0 . m T"" . .
..... __ ~ ~~M ~ ~ ~ ~~ == N ~
~ .
~ ~I
_ f- ICl
~ z f-I
@ 0 W 0 @
>c <0 F...J ~ @CIlF
!= 8l t;j Q S zw t;j
~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ CIl!~~ ~ ~ ~
o ~~ ~ Oz gS/ ~ Oz'RI Oz ~ R
~ ~(I') C') N- N co.......F (I') N
~
<
8 ...J
- ~
~ '" ~>c z
!::: z~:...J W
~Q $ "'~ 0
8l~ 8 8 8 8 8~ 8 8 g~~a 8 ~ 8
-0 ~ ~ g g g~ ~ ~ O-z~CIl ~ ~ g
~ ('I) ~ C\I N NW N (I') ~04.lt+ N (is N
d
?:
:J
~
CIl
m p m
~~ ~ ~ ~
J:: 'C :::i'C: J:
. ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
w"Q) a: 0 IV Z W (U C/)
Ie> <( CIlU. !ze>O I5';:: ::l
<(~ a. ~ ~CIl ~~ f- ~ W W -
I- C1I ...J..... rt! (!) 0:: cJ) (!Ji J:
g~ 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ 2 ~ ~ ~
~~ 5 ~ <(~?: ~ ~~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~
:::d::: CIl ;:::JO 0 ~d u. 0::: CIl <(
E-< 8 8 N ::; ~I 8 8 8 ,8 .., 8 .., 8 8 g:: 8 8 00
.., .., 00
.... 0 o 8 '" 0 ci d ci ::i 0 ...; 0 0 vi d d .,.;
...... >:.. '" ~ '" '"
.... ~ <- .., ~ ..
-' ~ ~ ... ".
'II: N ~ ...
t :w
(C;
~
C
.., ". ~ ::; on on '" 1" ; '" 8 '" '" 0 0 8 8 .. .... on '" ~ ~ '" ;j: ~II'" s
'" '" '" 00 ., 00 '" '" on '" on on ., 0 on 0
.... vi ~ 8 ~ '" .. ~ ... 0; ~ ~ '" ;;; :ti ~ '" .; :2 0 0; ,..: .; ~ .. ..'s '"
.. <- ;;: N :3 ~ on .... ~ '" '" '"
on - <- '" '" on '" '" '" '" ., ~I ~~ ..,
~ ,.; ..; ..; .... 00 '" ,.; ". -' :S' gf '" gf
N ,.; .... .; .... -
on '"
'"
....
0'1 :(1)
~ Z '"
.... 0 '\:l z ~
-- '" z 0
.... S z ::; ~ ~ tJ
0 0 oj Iii 0 .... :<:
Vi ::; "', z :> ;.,
Cl ;:l '" Iii "'I '" ;. .... z '" o :> if>' u
~ !il ~ '" ... ~ ~ u ~ "'I 10 0 '"
'" '" o ~ u ~
~I :l 0 ~ .... * *
'" '" z ~ ::l
&:l 0 '" u ~I I:J ffi :J ti '" '"
'" u ~ '" ..J 2 :> 3 0 ;. ~ -ri :3
Cl :::a 3 ~ ::l ffi' '" '" ~ ;1; 9 :J 0 ill '" Q 0 '" @
;;Q 2! ~ ~i '" >- "- @
:> - '" >- 91 '" 0:1
~ >- 15 R 0: :> ~ ~ 0.. 0 ~ Ol ~ ..J 15
~ 15 ~ ::l '" :<: t: :<: is :> 15
0 '" ~ g:' ;.. ~ 0 0.. '" '" '"
~ '" @ 0 ~ >- =-. p ~ ~ ~ '"
~ ::; ..J '" ..J ~, ~ '" ..J ..J :<: '" 0 ..J ::;,
a 15 o ~ I:J ... I:J 15 ~ '"
is is 0.. :I: ;;! '" :> ;;! :<: 0.. '" '" :<: '" '" is!
.... .... ~ ~ ~ ~ is 0 ~ f-' .... 0 :l u 0 '" .... is
~ Ul ~ ~. '" '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '" 5 '"
Ii: Vi Ii: Ii: 0.. "- 0.. '" 2 as 0.. 0.. Ii: " z '" Ii:
. . 'II\-
..... ~ & ~ ~
:<, ::l
lll' \;: :li .... ,
t I '0
.~ ~ ~ >- I~
'"
:<: 0 '" '" ~ ~ '" I;/.l! 1;1) :.f.l '" ",,0
o s: " ~ '" '" ~ '" ~ '" '" """,
~ !Ird I ~ as as 2: _!~ as zi>O
:;: , '" '" '" '" 0: 0: ","'I" '" o:i!;2
:E-; i
~ II~ I 8 8 8 ~ 8 I ,
0 ,.; -' vi :ti ,.; ,
- 1
<i ... I 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 S\ '" 0 0 8 ~ 8 8 ~18 8
0. d d d d 'I .... '" on
~I g g g g g g ~ g g g g g g g g g g g g ,..: ,..: ~ '# '# "'If N a: ,.; ori ."f ,.;
~ {i WI ::; ::; ::; ::; .., '" '" '" .. .., '" ....
lll'1 - I
< d :g !:'; '" .., '" .. - '" ~ '" .... :0: ll~ N '" :'1 '" :!l <- :g 0 .., '" on ~ & .... '" '" ;:: - ~ :! ;< on
.... .... .., <- '" ... ... '" .... on ., <- ~ '" '" .... on '" '" .... .,
pii ,..: ~ ~ 0; ~ -' ~ ~ ~ vi ~ ~ ~ M ,,0 ~. gi vi ~ -' ~ 8 ~ r;( -' ~ vi & .. ,..: ,.; 00 -' vi ci
Eo- .... :0: 0 ... ~I~ 0: .... :'1 ;::; ~ '" '" :!; ::; '" ...
'" '" '" on '" '" ., .... ~. '" '" '" <- ....
~li '"
~ zil v;
c:: -
- il
~
~II 8 8 8 8 8 :>5 i3 i3,i3 ~ :>5 i3 ~ 2:1!~ :!; ~ ~ :0: Iii 8 8 8 0 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ '" .., 2:113 '"
., '" '" <:>
:3 vi vi vi vi ~ vi $i~ .. -ri 0; ':,! ~1f;1 ,.; '# ,.; 0: 0 ~ ~ ~. ~ vi ,..: ,.; ?l "r ~ ~ ;5 ~ ~ '" '"
01 '" ~ ~ ~ '" '" .... :!l :., :1 on ;::; '" '" .. '" - '" :; .,
'" N '" .... 5 '" :l ::, :: '" '" '" - N
~ii oS ....1::; -' r -' ...; ...; '"
- - - '"
011
Ii I '"
illi! ~ I I ~
~li ~ $
"
~ .. II'" '" >- [:l ~13 I ..J is z
,.J g: ~ ~ 0.. ,;>- '" ;>-
,.J Izil~ ~ ~ ~I '", '" '" :I: '" B ~ ..J .... w 5 u
'" '" ~i u 5 @ U 0.. '" ~ Q z ;>- ~ ~ o :> '"
- IWil' ..J '" Z Z Z '" E- ~ ~
:t :> g "'1:>1'" ~ ~I~ u '" ~ eo '" - - ::; z e1 o ~ Ii:
u.ll 9 -' z ~ 8 '" > > 0: $ ~
, ., ~ :<: '" '" of. ::;1 g '" ~ U
>ll~ i= 0.. '" '" 8 <A1;i' '" '" ~ 0 - :!i 0: o :<: ~ '" '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ill;:i .
z on- '" 0 IZII I t:l ~! '" ~ o Ul '" >' >' I:J '" 0 ~ '" '" '" u ~ a of. ~
~ of. Ii ~ ~ . :> 01 .I I:J ...! Z '" '" g g: .J :i ~ - ~ ;i ~ z '" (g
'110 ~ ~ ffi as "- ~ '" 6 z'
~q~ '" ",' Q ~ ~ !;2 as '" :l ~ j '" 8 5l F ::; -' ~ '"
1'0 ~ (5 '" '" ~ Ci Ci "- '" ~ g: '" 8 z ~ ~ I:J
~ ::; 0 '" :> '" ~ z z (5 s: 8 ~ '" 0 $ '" '"
t ::2 (3 " "'- j 0 '" '"
:<: s: ~ g:: Ul;;i '" 0 :3 u ~ ::; @ u Ul t:l ~ :> III ~ Ul Ul '" ~ - ~ ~ :> 0 t:l
~ > '" 0.. ::; "- 0 0.. '" '" ::; 0.. "'! "- '" '" u :>- =,c..
~O ~ ~ ~ ~i~ ~'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' - s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I~ 8 m ; '" '" ., ~1;18 l'f"J1(<'l N
~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ 0
0 ~.z ~ ~ ~ ! i ~ ~ "" ~!
~ - N (",I N N '" '" '" '" ...
~ ~I ~I~ ~I~ ,
tig 0 ~ N '" on ~ .... ~ '" 0 ;:: ~ '" ;< '" ,e e:: ., '" :>5 .., ... ~ ~ ~ ~ '" ~ .., ... ~I:
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ <- .... " <- <- ~ t:J t:J ~ '"
u '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" ., ., '" '"
- - ~
.... 8 8 ; gl ... 8 8 8 8 0 8 ~ 8 8 8 8 8 8
'" N
~ d d ,..: .. d d d c:i ~ d =\ d d d d d d
...... '" !:; '" N
C\l '"
.... '" .... ~
=lI: .... ....
e a: >;Q
-- l:CI
a. i:: I ,
~
....
u i
'" - ; g ~ '" ~ R ~ ~I:ll ~ '" 0 0 8 8 :ll ex; ~ f;; ~ ~
'Xl ... 00 '" ::l '"
e:; ~ ,..: ,..: '" ::!: .... ~ ... ~ ~ !;i ~ ,.; ~ ~ ..; r-:..,: ~ ~ ,..;
!3 '" ... ~ 00 ~ r"'l MOOr-
::l '" ~ '" '" '" '" ..,. co ..... r"'l
~. N '" 00 ...; ...; ,;:} N ... ~ ;f ~~
'" N
'<I'
~ '"
Z 6 ~
N 0 ~ ~
-- as
.... e Z ~ ~
0 o . O.i Q E-o
- '" ;>
'" ::l a: z
CI ~ a: _ ~ IE ~ E-o ~ Q 0
~ ffi ~ :;l i5 Z ;.. OJ I
'" :;l 0 ~ Q ~ E-o
~ ~ ~ * *
Ci :;l ol:;l E-o u ~ :J ~ ~ '" '"
CI Q:J ~ ~ tS ili ~ ..l ;> ~ ..0 -..r:
tS @ '" ~ ~ ~ ~ gj U @)-
~ , ;> ~ Q ~ OJ '" ;><
en i5 51 ~ Z ;> OJ ~ 0 i5 ~
t3 0 '" i5 Ii: .. ~ Q ~ ~ > ~ ~ ~ ~ '" Q
s: i3 ~ ~ :;l ~ ~ ~ '" Q ~ i3 ~
OJ f:l ... f:l ~ ~ ~ u:(
a tS ;) 0. ~ Q ~ ~ [!j ;> ~ E-oO"'l-' tS tS
~ E-o E-o 13 ;;; ;;; ~ 13 13 1:i '" ~ E ~ ~ ~.: 13
~ v.i .. .. "- "- Ii: '" 2 2:i Ii: ri: r:::
. .. .'It.
..~ '" ... '" '" ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
g !z; ~ :s o ... :s
. .,~ ::l I I ::l
~ ..~ ~ ~ I ;>< ;>< I
Q '" '" Q
~ .... Z ~ Q Q ~ ~!~ ~ ;:! ~~ ~ u
.0 a a: ~ ~
:l tS Z S 2:i
<: ;> '" '" a: a: a: a: a: a: a:
>< II:;J H 10 ~ '" 8 8
~ I'" '"
.~. P I'" vi ~ '" ,..:
:;l . <5 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 '" ~ '" 0 :<'~ 0 00 8
~ '" '" '" '" "''''
g gig g g g g d g N g g g g g g g f'! g ;::l .... ~ gj ~;;( .... :::0\ g
>;Q '" ... '" ...
.... .'~ I
CI ... ::; ~ ill ~ '!j ... ~ ;;: ~ '!j '" '" '" '" r:: :g '" '" $:l r:: ::; ~ i:l;:!; - g:~ - N
'" ... '" '" ... '" '" "'. ... ... ... -
z .... g ~ d ~ gj g ~ ,.; vi ~ '" .... .; '" .; 8 :i ~ ~ ~ 6 ~ ~~ .; st~ S ....
.... 0 '" ... '" '" ~~ ~- '" "'. ~ 0
0 ~ '" ... '" '" '" '" '" '" '" 00 '" ... '" '" '" 00 '"
vi'
U -
tll I
en
iJoJl ~ i"l :ll t:! ~I ~ :ll ~ 8 l!? '" ~ '" ~ :;0 ~ ~I~ ~ '" 0 ::; '" '" '" ::: "'0 :ll ~
~. ... '" '" ~ '" '" "'''' 00
rJ':Il 13 '" $ .; .,; '" rJ ~ .... ~ '" vi 5 ~ ~ ,..: .x)N ,..: ..,:,..: vi '"
01 ~ r- ... ... i!l ~ ~~ '" :2 "':2 ~ '" ... ~ '"
'" ~ ~ '" ;:, ...
~ N .... ....1.... .... v;
'"
,
>;Q ~ I
en ~. ~ ~ ..l ~ I
;>< 3 F I
...l f.tl ~ $ 0. ;.. ;.. I
d g OJ OJ OJ ..l ;:: ><i ~ ~ ..l ..l :;ll~ U
>;QI ~ Z a: ~. u Z .. U 0. ~ ffi ~ 0 z ~ ~2 ;> ~ I
gj ;> '" ~ ::J 51 0 51 Z ~ I
::t IJ, 8 Z 51 ~!~I~ u 2 ~ 2 t::1a: I
'" ~I ;::
~I~ '" OJ a: ~ ~ Q 0 Z OJ ;:: ~g ~ \!itS I
z '" :i ~ ~ ~ :;l - 0. 0 U ffi
'" a: ~ >< ~ '" f:l a:IJ o! ~ '" :o.z I
a p.;:; ~ ;> 0 -I f:l J ><i ~ !!l t t ~ ff]><
ffi as "- '" '" Zo '" ..l
5l OJ :J ~ S2 '" dlS2l~ a:
~ 61 c:I' c:I' 5 8 ~ 8 Z :3 OJ", ::;;::J '" ~
e ::e @ '" ;> '" E-' i2 a: g; ~ 0 ~~ '" ~~ f:l
~ a: ~ '" Z 0 'z ill '"
OJ ;:i ~ ~ 2 :3 U ~ U 0 Ii: gjl~l~ OJ gj '" OJ ~ Ii: 13
< >;Q > 0. 0 '" ::;; a: '" ::;; '" u Q
~ .~. 01 ~ ~ ~ g ~I g ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ el~l~ 8 ~ - '" ... "'''' ~ ~~ '"
0 i i i ii g
>;Q ZI N '" N N '" '" '" -:; ...
~ ~ g ~ ~I~ ~ '" ~ ~ ~ ~ S $:l ::: ... '" '" ...!", '" o _ ~ l'I ... "'. '" ~i"l '"
- ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~I~ ~ ~I~ '" '" '" N
U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 2::2:: ~ 2::~ ~
- - ---- ------ -..------- ---
. PETmONS @
Alminst Terminal:
Mr. & Mrs. Tix 1770 W County Rd F
J. Michael Duncan 3976 Glenview Avenue
Mr. & Mrs. John Stenglein 1785 W County Rd F
Mr. & Mrs. John Hollenhorst 1822 Venus Avenue
./Mr. & Mrs. Rich Beardsley 1771 Janet Court
v Jim Borg 1812 Janet Court
v Mr. & Mrs. Steven Taylor 3905 Rolling Hills Rd
Derrek & Angela Hames 1839 Venus Avenue
Kim & William Dietrick 1785 Venus Avenue
Greg Fahey 1781 Janet Court
Ed Woo 3988 Glenview Avenue
Bernard Blascyk 4050 N Fairview
David Lyons 3908 Dellview Avenue
Beth & Brad Kimmer 1745 W County Rd F
Karen Albert 4090 Valentine Crest Rd
Laurence Amunson 1780 Glenview Avenue
Britt Lundgren 1777 Gramsie Road
. Fernando Palomino 4100 Valentine Crest Rd
,/ Dorothy & Donald Zehm 4028 N Fairview Avenue
Terese Syvertsen 1761 Gramsie Road
Kathryn M. Howell 3941 Rolling Hills Rd
Richard Aplikowski 1742 Gramsie Rd
John & Betty Eng 1746 Crystal Avenue
Janet Bishop 3947 Glenview Avenue
Genivieve Pearson 1637 Glenview Court
John & Evelyn Arneson 3931 Rolling Hills Road
Scott & Cami Gilsvik 1740 Venus Avenue
Joseph V odniek 1723 Glenview Avenue
Chant Insixiengmay 4055 Valentine Avenue
Xavier Pereira 3956 Glenview Avenue
SUDDort Terminal:
Steve Floeder 1798 Venus Avenue
Gordon Fay Gramsie Road
Woman in South Arden Hills
One Anymous Arden Hills resident
.
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 621
MOUNDS VIEW PUBLIC SCHOOLS
. District Service Center
SCHOOL BOARD MEMBERS
1993-94
CHAIR Home Tel. No. Term Exoires
Harold Kurtz 631-3726 12-31-95
1465 - 17th Avenue NW
New Brighton, MN 55112
VICE CHAIR
Dave Stimpson 482-9631 12-31-94
4945 Countryside Drive
Shoreview, MN 55126
CLERK
Lynda Thorl and 484-6649 12-31-95
5723 Pond Dri ve
Shoreview, MN 55126
TREASURER
. Mary Witucki 633-5001 12-31-94
1950 Fredeen Court
New Brighton, MN 55112
DIRECTORS
Brian Amundsen 786-5699 12-31-96
3048 Woodale Drive
Mounds View, MN 55112
Joellen Johnson 636-3697 12-31-95
3320 Lake Johanna Blvd.
Arden Hills, MN 55112
Marre Jo Sager 636-1941 12-31-96
1630 Daisy Court
New Brighton, MN 55112
STUDENT REPRESENTATIVES 1993-94
IRONDALE HIGH SCHOOL MOUNDS VIEW HIGH SCHOOL
Gia Roos Paul Thomas
5260 Greenfield Avenue 767 Cottage Place
Mounds View, MN 55112 Shoreview, MN 55126
. 786-8754 484-0521
I
l-
I
I
I
I FEASffiILITY STUDY
I FOR
1994 STREET IMPROVEMENTS
I CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA
I JANUARY 1994
.
I
I
I I hereby certify that this Feasibility Study was prepared by me or under my direct supervision
and that I am a duly registered Profession Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
I ~~ I~#;/
I Terry 1. rer, P.E. Date
Reg. No. 15316
I
Prepared for
I City of Arden Hills
r 520-047-10
I
.
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I Item ~
I Transmittal Letter 1
Table of Contents 2
I Introduction 3
Scope
I Existing Conditions
Exhibit One - Project Location Map 4
I Exhibit Two - Amble Drive 6
Exhibit Three - Bussard Court 8
I Proposed Improvements 9
Exhibit Four - Dunlap Street 10
II Exhibit Five - Keithson Drive 11
Exhibit Six - Typical Cross-Sections 14
I Easements and Permits 15
Estimated Costs
I Methods of Financing 16
Project Schedule
I Conclusion 17
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
MS
!1lISl1mG ~GL\IER.\ January 25, 1994
File No: 520-047-10
I
Honorable Mayor and City Council
I City of Arden Hills
1450 W. Highway 96
Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112
I RE: FEASffiILITY STUDY
:.:/,': .:'I,G,ir-",.'E:Rir\,; 1994 STREET IMPROVEMENTS
I E,.....VW2t>jI,':tNiA[ Dear Mayor and Council Members:
I ""L-I\',Ci~t\l As directed, MSA Consulting Engineers has completed the feasibility study for the
above referenced project. This study was authorized by Resolution 93-59 passed by
I ,;~A,~'~,';'NG the Arden Hills City Council on November 8, 1993. It was initiated based on a
recommendation from staff and the results of the City's CIP street rating systems.
The streets evaluated within the report are Amble Drive, Bussard Court, Dunlap
S,r.U:'~v'i:'A: Avenue and Keithson Drive. MSA Consulting Engineers has reviewed the existing
115J'''''% roadways from an engineering standpoint and obtained soil boring information on the
pavement cross section and subgrade soils. Based upon these findings and discussion
I with City staff, it has been determined that reconstruction is the most feasible means
TifAFFi( of rehabilitation for Amble Drive, Bussard Court and Dunlap Avenue while cold, in-
place recycling would be appropriate for the rehabilitation of Keithson Drive.
I TRAr-...'SPORTAilON
Items discussed in this feasibility study include existing conditions, proposed
improvements, estimated project costs, methods of financing the improvements and a
I proposed project schedule. The estimated project cost for rehabilitation of the four
streets is $394,800. In accordance with the City's Assessment Manual, assessments to
abutting property owners are proposed at a rate of 50% of the project cost.
I The 1994 Street Improvements project is feasible from an engineering standpoint.
Please contact our office if you have any questions or require additional information
I regarding the project.
1326 Energy Park Drive
Sincerely,
I St. Paul, MN 55108
612.644.4389 MSA CONSULTING ENGINEERS
I F",,; 612.644.9446 4e;~~
., 9800 Shelor<! Parkway Gregory J. Stonehouse
Minnea~i,. MN 55441
612.5A6.()432
I F",,: 612.544.6398
- ...---
Of) ~
GO
"
,"
,
. i ,., AMBLE
;' b
~ )' DRIVE
> r
I i
"
o.
I ff
t],wD
=
y
DUNLAP
< " STREET
,.'1;- ",.
'" ~9.
BUSSARD
~ ..,,,,,1. COURT
)01011:
AFDEN HU..S ~J:{lXlD~Dir
PRO.ECT LOCAllON MAP ~
AH 047EX1
----------- -~--- --- - ----
I
..
I INTRODUCTION
I The Arden Hills City Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report to outline the
proposed improvements of Amble Drive from Karth Lake Road to Lexington Avenue,
Bussard Court west of Snelling Avenue, Dunlap Street from Ingerson Road to Canon Drive
I and Keithson Drive south of T.R. 96. This feasibility was initiated by the City Council
following staff evaluation of the City's Capital Improvements Plan and the Pavement
Evaluation System included within the CIP. The streets are all located in neighborhoods
I which are zoned residential and are presented in Exhibit 1.
I SCOPE
I The purpose of this study is to analyze the feasibility of repairing Amble Drive, Bussard
Court, Dunlap Street and Keithson Drive. The options to be discussed range from complete
reconstruction with sub grade drainage improvements to a bituminous overlay over the existing
I surface or cold in-place recycling.
This feasibility study will discuss existing conditions proposed improvements and estimated
. project costs. The total project costs consist of estimated construction costs and overhead
costs, to include City administration, engineering, legal and fiscal expenses. The possible
fmancing methods will be addressed using the City's Assessment Manual as a guide. A
I proposed project schedule is also included in this report.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
I Amble Drive
I Amble Drive is approximately 1,925 feet long and extends from Karth Lake Road, southeast
to Lexington Avenue. The existing roadway is 32-feet wide with surmountable concrete curb
and gutter within a 60 foot wide right-of-way and serves a single family residential
I neighborhood, zoned R-l. The street should be reconstructed as a typical urban residential
section which would require a 32-foot wide roadway with B618 concrete curb and gutter and
a 9-ton design capacity in accordance with current Minnesota Department of Transportation
I (MnDOT) standards. Both sewer and water utilities extend along the length of Amble Drive;
however, no watermain work is required according to the City's public works department.
I The City has scheduled sanitary sewer televising prior to the initiation of street repairs, this
will provide information which will indicate whether or not sewer maintenance is necessary.
I 3
{'
I
T.H. 96 ~
I
w
>
Q:
0
f-
Z
<C
(/)
<C
w
w
[L
PL.EASANT CiR
W
>
<(
Z
'Y' 0
.~/..) ~
" " C)
":v Z
X
W
( ---1
'Y'
1-
/,
"
.-'lMBL.E ROAJ
+ BORING LOCA TlON
~,(& RECONSTRUCT STREET
. - - -. ASSESSMENT BOUNDARY
ALB...E DFIVE ~l:C[XJO~Oli
1184 SllEET uaROVBENTS ~
AH04 ?EX1
_.~_ _____________ ...__u_ .- -_.
---_.~---------- - --
I
~ The bituminous surface on Amble Drive is currently in very poor condition. The street is
severely distressed with evidence of extensive patching and alligator cracking. Surface frost
distortion is also present as outlined in the American Engineering Testing, Inc. (AEI) report
which is enclosed as Appendix A. According to the City's Pavement Management Program,
Amble Drive is rated 40 of a possible lOO points in the City's Pavement Management System
I which qualifies it as one of the three streets most in need of rehabilitation in Arden Hills.
The evidence of deteriorated pavement in the form of alligator cracking and potholes results
I from a combination of repeated traffic loading, unstable base, poor subgrade drainage and
less than optimal bituminous mix. The surface frost distortion is generally present as
heaving or buckling of the pavement section during repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Evidence of
I each of these types of distress is present throughout the length of Amble Drive, indicating
major structural distress within the pavement section.
I Storm water runoff currently drains toward intersections along the street. Catch basins and
storm sewer piping are currently located at intersections along Amble Drive. It appears that
the street grades are adequate to remove drainage from the roadway and the properties which
I drain onto the street. City maintenance personnel have attempted to maintain the roadway in
the past; however, continued patching will not counter the effects of the extensive
deterioration at this point in the streets design life.
I AET advanced four soil borings along the length of Amble Drive to evaluate both the
II pavement cross section and subgrade conditions and suitability. The location of these borings
are presented on Exhibit 2. The existing pavement section consists of a variable bituminous
pavement thickness ranging from 2IA-inches to 7-inches; however, evidence of a base layer
I was not present. The borings did indicate an oiled sand layer beneath the thin bituminous
layer. The subgrade soils vary from sandy lean clay to mixed fill soils. The poorest
conditions appear at the north end of Amble Drive and improve toward the south where the
I subgrade soils are somewhat more stable. Subgrade drainage would aid in the removal of
moisture found in some of the samples collected during the soil boring program.
I BII"~rd Court
Bussard Court extends approximately 660 feet from Old Snelling Avenue west to a cuI de sac.
I The roadway is 32-feet in width and has existing surmountable concrete curb and gutter. The
typical residential urban street section would be the appropriate method of reconstructing this
street. Sewer and water utilities extend along the length of the street and utility repairs and
I maintenance are not required according to public works staff; however, scheduled sewer
televising may produce information that will indicate otherwise. The street is in a residential
neighborhood, zoned R-I, single family residential.
I The existing bituminous surface indicates distress similar to that evident along Amble Drive.
The distress again consists of alligator cracking, potholes and frost distortion. The distress is
I 5
{'
I
~
-
"-
- LL,~AETT: L>.J
cr:
u
~
~
.
W
>
B S A D C <i
C>
z
:::i
---l
W
Z
(/)
Cl
---l
0
~ BORING LOCA TlON
W~ RECONSTRUCT STREET
. . . .. ASSESSMENT BOUNDARY
8USSAfD COlI1T ~j{!XIUlmUii
S84sna:r~ ~
AH047EXl
~_._--- -~.~-,-_._--
I
~ most severe in the western end of the street, again, indicating major structural distress within
the pavement section. Bussard Court has a Pavement Rating of 30 of a possible 100.
Storm drainage flows toward the intersection of Bussard and Snelling Avenue where it is
collected by catch basins and routed through storm sewer piping. A catch basin is also
I located within the cuI de sac on the west end of the street. This drains to the west into Lake
Johanna. It would be appropriate to place additional catch basins at the opening of the cui de
sac and change the grades along Bussard Court to improve the storm drainage system, making
I it an adequate system to remove storm runoff from the subgrade, streets and tributary
properties.
I AET advanced three soil borings within Bussard Court, indicating two-inches of bituminous
pavement overlying four to ten-inches of non-crushed gravel base. The boring locations are
presented on Exhibit 3 and the report is presented in Appendix A. The subgrade soils are
I mostly sandy lean clay fill with some clayey sand and lean clay. The fill placed in the cuI de
sac was particularly soft and moist, again indicating the need for subgrade drainage if
reconstruction is the selected option of rehabilitation.
I Dunlan Street
I Dunlap Street extends from Ingerson Road north approximately 1,100 feet to a dead end north
of Cannon Avenue. The roadway is approximately 32-feet in width and has deteriorated
II bituminous curbing within a 6O-foot wide right-of-way. The area in which the roadway is
located is again zoned R-l, single family residential. Due to the zoning and associated traffic
characteristics of Dunlap Street, the street should be constructed to meet the 32-foot wide, 7-
I ton design standard for an urban residential street. There are no apparent maintenance
requirements associated with the watermain. The sewer is scheduled for televising prior to
the construction taking place to determine whether any maintenance or repairs are required.
I The existing bituminous surface along Dunlap Street is level and the distress is less severe
than the pavement on Amble Drive and Bussard Court. There is alligator cracking and some
I surface scaling present along the entire length of Dunlap Street. Additional information
regarding the pavement conditions is presented in AET's report. Again, Dunlap Street is one
of three streets most in need of rehabilitation in the City with a Pavement Rating of 33 out of
I a possible 100 points. .
Storm drainage flows toward Tiller Lane which was reconstructed in 1991 with subgrade
I drainage and storm sewer improvements. The street grades along Dunlap Street are currently
inadequate to remove the runoff from the street and tributary areas just north of Ingerson
Road. Additional catch basins and storm sewer piping may be necessary to better
I accommodate the storm drainage in the vicinity of this intersection.
AET advanced three soil borings along the length of Dunlap Street indicating bituminous
I
{' 7
I
~
\\ ....
It)
:i
- ' \ r-:
\ \ Cfl.t?t,,0
\ \
I ?"fl.I'
-- -
T~L:Y !_ANE ....
.
en
0....
<(
Z
::)
0
INGERSO',
w
>
<(
w
z
~
2'
<(
:r:
z
~ BORING LOCATION
~~ RECONSTRUCT STREET
. . - .. ASSESSMENT BOUNDARY
DUNLAP S11EET ~~1MI0lmOiJ
8M snEET M'ROYB.ENTB ~
AH047EXl
I
~ pavement thickness ranging from l'h to 3',4-inches and a non-crushed gravel base ranging
from 4'% to 6'h-inches in thickness. The subgrade again consists of clayey fill soils underlain
by sandy lean clay and clayey sand natural soils. A wet silty sand layer was present above
the till at boring #12 presented on Exhibit 4. The alligator cracking and the presence of
moisture in the sample collected at boring #12 again indicate the need for subgrade
I corrections and drainage improvements along Dunlap Street. The Am soils report is
presented in Appendix A.
I Keithson Drive
Keithson Drive is a street that is approximately 800 feet in length and 10 years in age. The
I street is currently constructed to the City's 32-foot wide, 9-ton design standard with
sunnountable concrete curb and gutter. The pavement contains limited cracking and no
distress that might be associated with soft subgrade conditions or water trapping/frost distress.
I The sewer and water utilities installed on Keithson Drive were completed in 1983 and are not
in need of repairs or maintenance.
I The problems with the pavement surface on Keithson Drive appear to be associated with
utility service trench settlement rather than differential frost heaving. Three soil borings were
I advanced along the length of Keithson to evaluate the pavement conditions, subgrade
conditions and any differences between apparent utility trenches and native subgrade areas.
The pavement consists of 2'h to 3-inches of bituminous pavement underlain by 5 to 7'h-
. inches of crushed limestone base. A 2 to 2'h-foot granular borrow layer lies beneath the base
material, beneath which are sandy lean clay and clayey sand fill soils. The soils were
determined to be suitable by Am. Significant pavement problems associated with sub grade
I soils should not be an issue in the future as a very limited amount of settlement will occur
after the roadway has been in-place for several years.
I Boring #2 was intentionally located in a utility trench to attempt to determine possible causes
of differential settlement. There were no significant differences in the material at the time of
testing, which would indicate that future settlement should not occur, thus reducing the
I probability of future pavement deflection. The locations of the soil borings are presented on
Exhibit 5.
I Storm drainage improvements were implemented with the street construction in the 1980's
and these improvements appear to adequately contain and route the storm drainage runoff into
Keithson Pond.
I PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
I The various options of street rehabilitation for these four streets have been reviewed and
discussed with City staff and the City Council. The roadways are clearly in need of
improvements, three methods of which are outlined below:
I
{' 9
I
~
T.H. 96
VILLAGe.
H.A.LL &
;:;UEL<~' [IJITill
'NC.p~, ::
ITJ] & & @ ~
&fjjJ
. ITJ] Il!z; '@
[IJOJ !l/];fNj
---- ITIIJOJ
/ ) ITIIJ Gill OJ
r "\.~ ITIIJOJ []
/-~
\- rn rn ITIIJ Il!z;
- '-
( ~
ARDEN VIEW DR
'@ Il!z; ~ I \
~ 01 I
KE1HSON DfIVE ~~IMlO~Olr
1I84SJfEET ~ @
AH047EXl
I
~ Complete reconstruction
Cut and patch distressed areas of the existing pavement, followed by a
bituminous overlay of the entire surface.
I Cold in-place recycling of the existing pavement, followed by a bituminous
overlay of the entire surface.
I Brief synopses of the various methods of street rehabilitation follow. The summaries address
the advantages and disadvantages of each method relative to the apparent subgrade conditions
encountered during the soil boring program in Arden Hills, Minnesota.
I Roadway reconstruction allows for the sub grade improvements necessary to reduce the impact
I of frost and poor drainage. This sub grade preparation should include the placement of a sand
drainage layer and edge drains to route subgrade moisture through the storm sewer system.
The subgrade performance should be significantly improved with the installation of a
I minimum of one foot of subgrade sand. In areas of poorer subgrade strength, a two foot
sand drainage layer may be required. Although this is the most costly method of street
rehabilitation, it will provide a superior and longer lasting street surface.
I Bituminous patching followed by a bituminous overlay may present a lower initial cost, but
the repair is a short term fix at best. The frost damage, drainage problems and reflective
.. cracking would continue to appear within the new pavement within two to five years,
resulting in higher maintenance costs and a shorter street life.
I Cold in-place recycling will provide an acceptable street surface for the volume of traffic
expected on a residential street and will also allow for the grading and compaction of the base
to provide a smooth, crack free surface prior to placing bituminous material. Placement of
I subgrade granular material is limited with this method of street rehabilitation; however, if
subgrade preparation is not required, this method provides a good, long lasting surface (10-12
years) for a relatively inexpensive cost.
I Amble Drive. Bussard Court and Dunlao Street
I Complete reconstruction is the method of street rehabilitation recommended for Amble Drive,
Bussard Court and Dunlap Street. These streets all show signs of frost damage and poor
I subgrade drainage conditions which could be improved through the placement of a sand
drainage layer and edge drains as outlined above. The soils within the subgrade along these
streets should be subcut to a depth of one foot and tested for stability through a test rolling
I program as outlined in the AET report. If the test rolling determines that the desired soil
stability is not reached, the section should be subcut to a depth of approximately IS-inches.
Based upon the soil boring program, up to two-foot subcuts may be necessary at the northern
I half of Amble Drive and the within the cuI de sac on Bussard Court. This will require field
{' 12
I
I
~ evaluation prior to subcutting deeper than the proposed 18-inches. The subgrade will then be
replaced with granular borrow material to the same elevation as the existing subgrade. A
granular equivalency of 14 inches of gravel is required for the existing native material in
order to meet the 9-ton design standard. This would require approximately six inches of class
five aggregate base and three inches of bituminous material.
I The typical street cross-section is presented on Exhibit 6. The cross-section would meet the
MnDOT design standard for an urban residential street, specifically a 9-ton roadway, 32-feet
I in width. In addition to the street improvements, B6l8 concrete curb and gutter would be
installed along all of these streets and four-inch perforated drain tile would be installed either
I along the length of the streets in flat sections, or transversely on sloped sections to provide
additional sub grade drainage. These drains would then be connected to the existing storm
sewer catch basins to remove moisture from the street sections.
I Concrete driveway aprons would be provided to match the new street grade and boulevards
would be restored with topsoil and sod upon completion of the street construction. Utility
I structures would also be adjusted to match the existing pavement surface upon completion of
paving operations.
I The costs associated with the reconstruction of these streets are presented in the cost
tabulation section of this report. Approximate costs for the construction of each individual
street are provided for the purpose of comparison.
. Keithson Drive
I The most feasible method of rehabilitating Keithson Drive would be the cold in-place
recycling method. This method consists of the milling and pulverizing of the existing
pavement which is then placed back on the roadway as additional base material. This base is
I then graded and compacted, then overlaid with two inches of bituminous material. This
would restore the street to its original design strength. The concrete curb and gutter would
remain in place and driveways and boulevards would not be disturbed; therefore, reducing
I construction costs. Sections of concrete curb and gutter totalling approximately l5D-200
linear feet will require replacement or adjustment due to settlement as well. A typical street
cross-section is presented on Exhibit 6.
I Ramsey County continues to utilize this method of roadway rehabilitation as it provides more
I benefit than an overlay at a cost lower than that of reconstruction. The County has been very
aggressive in this type of construction and continues to be encouraged with the results. The
cost of cold in-place recycling of Keithson Drive is presented in the cost tabulation section of
I this report.
I
I' 13
I
16' 16'
B618 CONCRE1E CURB " GU R
I I
;
I
! 0
1 1/2" 2331 TYPE 41 BITU~INOUS WEAR COURSE
/ TACK COAT
--.l 2 " 2331 TYPE 31 BASE COURSE
4' PERF. HOPE
EOGEORAIN WITH 6" CLASS 5 AGGREGA 1E BASE
GE01EXTlLE SOCK
(AS NECESSARY) 18" SUBCUT BACKFIll W/ SELECT GRANULAR BORROW
RECONSlRUCT
16' 16'
SURMOUNTABLE CONCRE1E CURB & GUTTER
I
2 1/2" 2331 TYPE 41A BIT. Vtl::AR COURSE
REIoIOVE 2 1/2" RECYCLED ~A TERIAl
Mlll/RECYCLE EXISTING PAVEMENT TO A DEPTH OF 4"
EXISTING GRAVEL BASE
RECYCLE
ARDEN HLl..S ~~IXlO~O'U'
TYPICAL ~
AH047EXl
--
I
~ EASEMENTS AND PERMITS
All four of the streets addressed in this report have 6O-foot right-of-ways and it does not
appear that additional easements will be required to complete cold in-place recycling or
I complete reconstruction projects as the work will be limited to the road surface area and
boulevard areas.
I FSTIMA TED COSTS
The estimated construction and project costs for the recommended options of reconstruction
I are provided in the cost tabulation section of this report. As the means of street rehabilitation
have been discussed with City staff and the Council, only the most technically and
economically feasible method of improvement has been included in this report.
I Estimated construction costs are based on actual bids received in 1993 for projects of similar
construction and scope. These costs are then adjusted using a 4 % factor for inflation.
I Estimated project costs include overhead costs equal to 32 % of the construction cost as
detailed by the City's Assessment Manual. This overhead costs includes city Administration,
engineering design, construction inspection and staking, fiscal and legal expenses.
I The following table presents the estimated costs of reconstruction for Amble Drive, Bussard
Court, and Dunlap Avenue. These costs include the excavation of up to two feet of the
.. clayey subgrade, placement of granular material, new concrete curb and gutter, street
reconstruction and all associated restoration:
I TABLE ONE
ESTIMATED STREET RECONSTRUCTION COSTS
I Construction Construction Overhead F&imated
Street LeDInh Included Cost ~ Proiect Cost
I
Amble Drive 1,925 ft New Street, Cone. $140,900 $45,100 $186,000
I Curb and Gutter &
Subgrade Drainage
I Bussard Court 660 ft New Street, Cone. $54,800 $17,500 $72,300
Curb and Gutter &
Sub grade Drainage
I Dunlap Ave. 1,093 ft New Street, Cone. $83,300 $26,700 $110,000
Curb and Gutter &
I Subgrade Drainage
{' Total Reconstruction Costs $279,000 $89,300 $368,300
15
I
I
I. The following table presents the costs associated with the milling, recycling, base preparation
I and overlaying of Keithson Drive:
TABLE TWO
I ESTIMATED COLD IN-PLACE RECYCLING COSTS
I Construction Construction Overhead Fm:imated
Street Lemrth Included Cost Cost Proiect Cost
I Keithson Dr. 800 ft Milling, Grading, $20,000 $6,500 $26,500
Curb Replacement
I METHODS OF FINANCING
I The feasibility study was initiated by the City Council as a result of public concern regarding
the affected streets. The City's Assessment Manual outlines a method of partially assessing
property owners for the reconstruction of public streets. This assessment rate, set by a City
I Council resolution, is based upon an assessment of 50% of the total project cost.
As Amble Drive, Bussard Court and Dunlap Street will all be constructed in a similar
. fashion, the residential assessment cost for the entire reconstruction phase of the project is
determined by dividing the reconstruction cost by the total length of street frontage and
multiplying that cost by 50% as the City intends to assume half of the project cost. The total
I project cost for reconstruction is estimated at $368,300 and the total length of assessable front
footage is approximately 6,150 lineal feet. This results in an assessment amount of $29.23
per linear foot of frontage and a City cost of approximately $184,150. Approximately
I $74,000 of this City share is to be paid from the storm water management fund as storm
drainage improvements.
I Keithson Drive was constructed to higher standard than streets built in the sixties and
seventies. Due to this consideration, the necessary construction on Keithson will consist of
I the cold in-place recycling to reduce project costs. This amounts to a total project cost of
$26,500 and results in an assessment of approximately $11.04 per front foot to property
owners and a City cost of approximately $13,250.
I PROJECT SCHEDULE
I The following is a proposed project schedule for improvements on Amble Drive, Bussard
Court, Dunlap Avenue and Keithson Drive which allows an assessment hearing to be held
prior to award of a construction contract and complete construction prior to August 31, 1994.
I
I. 16
I
I
~ Proiect Task Completion Date
Receive Feasibility Study/ January 31, 1994
Order Public Hearing/Order Preparation
of Plans and Specifications
I Hold Public Hearing/ Approve Plans February 28, 1994
and Specifications / Order Project
I Authorize Advertisement for Bids
I Open Bids March 25, 1994
Receive Bids / Order Assessment Hearing March 28, 1994
I Hold Assessment Hearing April 25, 1994
Award Contract
I Begin Construction May 1994
I Complete Construction August 1994
This schedule is subject to change based upon circumstances that may arise from the
. assessment process. Based upon a conservative estimate of the time required for each phase
of the MS 429 process, the project should be complete during August 1994.
I CONCLUSION
Based upon the current conditions of Amble Drive, Bussard Court and Dunlap Street and the
I service life of the options evaluated under those conditions, reconstruction is the most feasible
method of street rehabilitation for these particular streets. These recommendations have been
discussed and evaluated with the Arden Hills public works department and City staff. The
I most feasible option for the rehabilitation of Keithson Drive is cold in-place recycling as that
street shows signs that would be associated with an existing subgrade that is conducive to this
construction method. The reconstruction of the streets addressed above would provide a
I roadway that serves the affected neighborhood for 20 to 30 years while the cold in-place
recycling will provide a roadway which will last from 12 to 20 years. The costs associated
I with this project include $197,400 to the City of Arden Hills, $184,150 assessed to residents
of Amble Drive, Bussard Court and Dunlap Street at the rate of $29.23 per linear foot of
frontage and $13,250 assessed to residents of Keithson Drive at a rate of $11.04 per front
I foot.
The 1994 Street Improvements Project is technically feasible from an engineering standpoint
I and would meet all standards and requirements outlined in the City's Capital Improvement
Plan.
{' 17
I
I
,
I
I
APPENDIX A
I
American Engineering and Testing
I Geotechnical Evaluation Report
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f'
I
_ ---------.. ---------- ----
I
..
I
I
I
I
~ - - REPORT OF
I GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION AND REVIEW
FOR
PROPOSED STREET IMPROVEMENTS
I ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA
I
.. AET #93-1379
1
I
;
I PREPARED FOR:
,
!
I MAIER STEWART & ASSOCIATES
1959 SLOAN PLACE
1 ST. PAUL, MN 55117
I
I
I AUGUST 17, 1993
I
{'
I
--
I
~ AMERICAN CONSULTANTS
, ENGINEERING . GEOTECHNICAL
. MATERIALS
TESTING, INC. ~ ENVIRONMENTAL
I
I August 17, 1993
I Maier Stewart & Associates
1959 Sloan Place
I' St. Paul, MN 55117
Attn: Greg Stonehouse
I
RE: Geotechnical Exploration and Review
I Proposed Street Improvements
Arden Hills, Minnesota
AET #93-1379
II Dear Mr. Stonehouse:
I This is our report on the subsurface exploration program and associated geotechnical engineering
review we recently conducted for the improvements planned for four separate roadways in Arden
Hills. This report documents the exploration/test results and provides our opinions and
I recommendations to aid you in planning and construction of the project.
Please do not hesitate to call if you have questions about the report. I can also be contacted for
I arranging construction observation and testing services during the actual earthwork phase.
Very truly yours,
I J:!f'7 t ~.-
I
Jeffery K. Voyen, PE
Manager, Geotechnical Engineering
I Phone: (612) 659-1305
Fax: (612) 659-1379
I JKV/maa
I'
I "AN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER"
2102 Un/1l8rs1ly Ave. W. St. Paul, MN 55114.. 612~659-9001 . Fax 612-659-1379
4431 Wes.t Michigan Street. Suite.4. Duluth, MN 55807 . 218-628-1518. Fall 218-628-1580
1730 First Avenue. Mankalo, MN 56001 . 507-387-2222. Fax 507-387-6999
----- ---- --------
I
GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION AND REVIEW ~
FOR
PROPOSED STREET IMPROVEMENTS
ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA
AET #93-1379 I
CONTENTS I
~ I
SU1\ll\fARY ............................................. 1
Purpose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1 I
Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1
Findings ......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1
Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1 I
INTRODUCTION .............. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Scope of Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 2 I
PROJECT INFORMATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 3
SITE CONDITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 II
Existing Pavement Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 4 I
Subsurface Soils/Geology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 4
Water Level Measurements .................................6
LABORATORY TESTING ................. .................. 7 I
ENGINEERING CONSIDERATIONS ............................7 I
General. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Review of Soil Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 8
Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 I
RECOMMENDATIONS. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 8
Sub grade Preparation/Reconstruction Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 I
Subgrade Soil Factors/R-Value . .. . .. .. .. .. . .. . .. .. .. . .. . .. .. . 12
Subgrade Drainage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION AND TESTING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 I
I
..
I
I
~ CONTENTS
PAGE 2
I
Pae:e
I EXPLORATION PROCEDURES ...............................13
Boring Location/Elevation Data .............................. 13
I Field Sampling/Testing Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Classification Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Sample Storage ........................................14
I EXPLORATION PROGRAM LIMITATIONS .......................14
I STANDARD OF CARE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . .15
CLOSURE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
I APPENDIX A
I Boring Location Sketches
Logs of Test Borings
Results of Sieve Analysis Test
. Field Sampling and Testing Methods
Boring Log: Abbreviations, Notations and Symbols
Identification of Soils
I Soil Identification and Description
Geologic Terminology
Boring Logs: Ground Water Information
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
- - ----.-------
I
GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION AND REVIEW J
FOR
PROPOSED STREET IMPROVEMENTS
ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA I
AET #93-1379 I
SUMMARY
PUlllose I
The City of Arden Hills is considering improvements to Keithson Drive, Amble Drive, Bussard I
Court and Dunlap Street. The purpose of our work on this project is to obtain subsurface
;." information along the streets, and based on this data, prepare a geotechnical engineering report
presenting comments and recommendations to assist you and the project team in planning and I
construction.
Scope I
To accomplish the above purpose, you have authorized our firm to drill 13 test borings on the
existing streets, perform laboratory testing, and furnish a geotechnical engineering report.
Findine:s I
Most subgrade soils are clayey (lean clays to clayey sands), except for Keithson Drive which
includes a 2' + granular borrow layer at the top of subgrade. The subgrade instability due to .
wet conditions is most apparent in the north segment of Amble Drive and the west segment of
Bussard Court. Otherwise, existing distress appears to be the result of poor subgrade frostl
drainage characteristics. Clayey soils below the granular borrow layer at Keithson Drive are I
judged reasonably stable and consistent, even in roadway "dip" areas.
Recommendations I
These recommendations are in condensed form for your convenience. It is important that you
study our entire report for detailed recommendations. I
. The borings indicate Keithson Drive has favorable subgrade soil conditions. Past local
sagging of the road may be associated with utility trench settlement, although we suspect I
future settlements will be low. Surface improvements by means of cold, in-place
recycling may be the appropriate improvement method for this roadway.
. The remainder of the roadways include significant surface distress, much of which we I
attribute to the poor frost and drainage characteristics of the subgrade. We recommend
reconstruction of these roads, including the use of aI' minimum thickness of Select
Granular Borrow. I
. We recommend increasing the sand layer thickness to 2' in areas of wet, unstable clays.
, . Unstable soils in subcut bottoms should be scarified, dried and recompacted until a test-
I
I
roll can be passed. An alternative would be to place a geotextile fabric at the subcut I
bottom.
. Sand layers should be provided with a means of subsurface drainage. --
I
I
.. AET #93-1379 - Page 2
I
INTRODUCTION
I
The City of Arden Hills is considering improvements to four existing bituminous streets. As
I a part of the project study, you have authorized American Engineering Testing, Inc., (AEf) to
conduct on-site subsurface exploration, soil testing and geotechnical engineering analysis. This
I report presents the soil and ground water information we obtained at the site, and our associated
engmeering opinions and recommendations based on this data.
I
To protect you, AET, and the public, we authorize use of opinions and recommendations in this report
I only by you and your project team for this specific project. Contact us if other uses are intended. Even
though this report is not intended to provide sufficient information to accurately determine quantities and
locations of particular materials, we recommend that your potential contractors be advised of the report
I availability.
. Scope of Services
The scope of our services is presented in our July, 1993, proposal letter to you. Our agreed-
I upon scope of services reported herein includes the following:
I . Observe current roadway distress/conditions.
I . Locate and drill 13 standard penetration test borings to a depth of 6' each.
I . Perform soil laboratory testing.
I . . Prepare an engineering report which includes logs of the test borings, presentation of the
soil and ground water conditions, the laboratory test results and our geotechnical
I engineering opinions and recommendations regarding the following:
I - Sub grade preparation
{' - Estimated soil factors/R -values
I
I
AET #93-1379 - Page 3 ~
Subgrade subsurface drainage
-
The scope of our work is intended for geostructuraJ purposes only. This scope is not intended to explore I
for the presence or extent of environmental contamination at the site. I
PROJECT INFORMATION I
-
Four existing roadways are being considered for improvements by means of overlaying, cold in- I
place recycling, or complete reconstruction including subgrade preparation. These streets are
as follows: I
I
Keithson Drive Highway 96 to South End 800' .
Amble Drive Karth Lake Road to Lexington Avenue 1,925'
Bussard Court Snelling Avenue to West End 660' I
Dunlap Street Cannon Avenue to Ingerson Road 1,093'
I
We understand the above improvements will take place at the same general elevation and width I
as the existing road surfaces. Actual traffic type and frequency projections are not available to
us; although these roadways do lie within residential areas, and truck traffic frequency should I
be relatively low.
I
The presented project information represents our understanding of the proposed constrUction. This
information is an integral part of our engineering review. It is important that you contact us if there are I
changes from that described so that we can evaluate whether modifications to our recommendations are
appropriate.
~
I
I
~ AET #93-1379 - Page 4
I SITE CONDITIONS
I Existing Pavement Conditions
I Keithson Drive
The roadway includes minor patching, although pavement cracking is relatively limited; and no
I distress which is normally associated with soft subgrade soils or local water trapping/frost pop-
outr'is apparent. The surface is distorted, although the distortion is quite gradual and local. It
I appears that the distortion is more likely associated with utility/house service backfill trench
settlement rather than differential frost heaving.
I
Amble Drive
I Amble Drive is a severely distressed bituminous system. Local portions of the road include
II patching and severe alligator cracking. Some surface frost distortion is also present.
I Bussard Court
Pavement distress along this roadway is similar to that at Amble Drive. Distress tends to be
I more severe in the western end.
I Dunlap Street
Generally, this roadway is relatively level, but does include local alligator cracking and some
I bituminous surface scaling. In general, distress is less severe than Bussard Court and Amble
Drive.
I Subsurface Soils/Geology
I We have included the logs of the test borings and boring location sketches in the Appendix. We
refer you to the logs for specific information concerning soil layer depths, soil/geology
I descriptions and density/consistency, based on the penetration resistance (N-value).
:f
I
--
I
AET #93-1379 - Page 5 J
It is important to note that the subsurface conditions only indicate the material classification/properties at I
the sampled locations and variations do occur between and beyond borings.
I
Keithson Drive (Borings #1-3) I
The borings indicate bituminous thicknesses ranging from 2]12" to 3". Underlying base is mostly
crushed limestone with thicknesses ranging from 5" to 7'12". The roadway also includes a silty I
sand layer (granular borrow) which extends to about 3' beneath the top of the road surface.
Soils below this depth are sandy lean clay and clayey sand fill soils. Although N-values are not I
overly high in portions of the sub grade, and moisture contents are likely a little over the
"optimum moisture content level," we do judge that none of these soils are excessively unstable I
such that they should directly lead to significant pavement problems.
Please note that Boring #2 was specifically placed within an obvious east/west sag within the I
pavement. It appears these sags may be associated with utility/service backfill, and the boring .
was specifically placed for comparison to the two remaining borings (which were not placed in
sag areas). Because of the potential for buried utilities, this boring was only extended to 4', I
although it did allow us to compare profiles with the other two borings. Our review of these
borings suggest no significant differences are present in the sag area versus the remainder of the I
roadway.
I
Amble Drive (Borings #4-7)
The borings indicate quite variable pavement thicknesses ranging from 2',4" to 7". The borings I
suggest the lack of a base layer, although Borings #5 and #6 suggest an oiled sand layer below
the rather thin bituminous, which could potentially be a poor quality/weathered bituminous. I
Sub grade soils vary from lean clay with sand glacial till to cohesive mixed fill soils. Stability
of the clays appears to be variable, based on the wet and soft condition of some of the samples. I
Poorest subgrade conditions appear on the north end and transitionally tend to improve to the
south, where the soils at Boring #7 are more stable. ~
I
I
~. AET #93-1379 - Page 6
I Bussard Court ffiorinl!s #8-10}
I These borings indicate 2" of bituminous pavement overlying 4" to 10" of non-erushed gravel
base. Soils directly below the base are mostly sandy lean clay fill with some clayey sand and
I lean clay. This fill is particularly soft and wet at Boring #8 which was placed in the west cul-
de-sac area. Underlying natural soils are organic clay/silty clay in the cul-de-sac area and sandy
. lean clay glacial till at the two remaining boring locations.
-
'. Dunlao Street CBorinl!s #11-13)
I Bituminous pavement thicknesses at the test locations range from l'h" to 3 \4 ". Base thicknesses
range from 4*" to 6'h", and the base is a non-crushed material. Clayey fill soils again underlie
I the base, although these fIll soils tend to be reasonably stable based on N-values and sample
review. Underlying natural soils are mostly sandy lean clay/clayey sand glacial till, although
.. a wet silty sand layer is present above the till at boring #12.
I Water Level Measurements
During the drilling operations, we probed the boreholes for the presence of ground water. The
I results of theses measurements are noted on the attached boring logs. As indicated, no ground
water entered most of the boreholes at the time of drilling. The exception to this appears at
I Boring #12 where the silty sand alluvium is interbedded between the clayey fill and underlying
till. A water level was measured at a depth of 3.8' beneath the surface at this boring location.
I It is our judgment this water is perched/trapped within the moderate draining granular layer.
I You should expect ground water levels to fluctuate in the future. Fluctuations occur due to varying
seasonal and yearly rainfall and snow melt, as well as other factors.
I The attached Appendix sheet entitled "Boring Logs: Ground Water Information" provides
I additional information on ground water level measuring.
f
I
___ ___---.n ___ - __ ___n______
I
AET #93-1379 - Page 7 I
LABORATORY TESTING e,
I
To aid our judgment of soil stability properties, 5 of the split spoon samples were submitted to
the laboratory for moisture content testing. The results of these tests appear on the boring logs I
opposite the samples upon which they were performed (We column).
I
BeCause the granular layer at Keithson Drive appears to have been specifically placed as a sand
layer within the subgrade, we combined samples from Borings #1 through #3 for a composite I
sieve analysis test. The results of this test appears on the data sheet included in the appendix I
(behind the boring logs). This sample had 19% by weight passing the #200 sieve. Therefore,
this material would meet the gradation requirements for a Granular Borrow (MnDOT 3149.2A), I
but not a Select Granular Borrow (MnDOT 3149.2B).
ENGINEERING CONSIDERA nONS ..
General I
For roadway support, a high level of strength is quite important within the upper portion of the I
soil subgrade. Bituminous pavements are "flexible" systems and wheel loads transmit high local
stresses to the subgrade. However, the load intensity dissipates through the subgrade such that I
the high level of strength is usually not needed below about 3'. This is the purpose of requiring
a higher level of compaction within fill placed in the upper subgrade zone versus the lower I
portion. Moderate compaction is usually desired below the upper critical zone, primarily to
avoid settlements and sags of the roadway. I
Long-term pavement performance is also dependent on the soil sub grade drainage and frost I
characteristics. Poor draining soils tend to be susceptible to frost heave and subsequent
,-- weakening upon thaw. This condition can result in irregular frost movements and "popouts," I
as well as a general softening of the subgrade. --
I
-----------
I
I AET #93-1379 - Page 8
,. Review of Soil Prooerties
I . Strength/Stability - Opinions relative to subgrade strength and stability have been
generally discussed in the previous Site Conditions section which describes the soil
I encountered at each individual street location. Generally, much of the soil subgrade
appears to be reasonably stable with more obvious exceptions within the upper 3' zone
I noted at Boring #4, #5, and #8. Conditions at Boring #6 are also somewhat unstable,
- although sample review suggests the condition is not a severe as the other described
I locations. Please note that soil conditions encountered are mixed and variable, and we
I expect stability properties will also be variable along the roadways such that some local
or "spotty" zones of instability will exist.
I . Compressibility - Without a significant grade increase, and assuming upper soils are
.. corrected as needed for strength reasons, compressibility of the subgrade soils will not
be a problem at this site.
I . Drainage Properties - Most of the subgrade soils are clayey, which are relatively poor
I draining materials. These soils can allow for perching or trapping of water within the
base and sub grade. The main exceptions to the above are as follows:
I - The silty sand layer within the upper 3' along Keithson Drive meet the
I requirements of a granular borrow. These soils are judged to be moderately fast
to moderate draining.
I The sand layer noted from 3' to 4' deep at Boring #12 is a silty sand which is also
-
I at least moderately draining. This particular layer was found to include trapped
water, which resulted in a measurable water level within the borehole.
I
i'
I
---.-
I
AET #93-1379 - Page 9 .'
. Frost Susceptibility - The on-site soils are at least moderately frost susceptible. I
Generally, these soils can heave 1/4" :t for each foot of frost penetration. Where I
subgrade conditions are uniform laterally, such as where the granular borrow layer is in-
place, frost movements tend to be uniform. However, where soils are mixed with I
varying soil types, differential frost movements can occur. This becomes particularly
pronounced where water can be locally trapped. I
-
Discussion I
Sub grade conditions at Keithson Drive are more favorable than at the remaining road locations,
particularly from a frost! drainage standpoint. This is evident in the surface pavement condition. I
We suspect the sags in the roadway are associated with looser (and probably deeper) utility
backfill soils which have settled in the past. We judge that most of the backfill settlement should I
have occurred and future movements should be less.
..
At the remaining road locations, much of the pavement distress is probably due to poor frost and I
drainage properties of the soils. Even where the soils appear to have a reasonable level of
stability, distress is evident. I
The soil conditions portrayed by Borings #4, #5, #8, and possibly #6, also have low strength I
which should be corrected. Since these areas are also associated with higher moisture contents,
the frost condition is also more exaggerated. I
We understand you are considering improvements ranging from overlaying the existing I
bituminous to cold in-place recycling (which does not allow for subgrade preparation) to
pavement reconstruction (which does allow for subgrade preparation). Our comments relative I
to these approaches and the in-place conditions are as follows:
I
..
I
I
I AET #93-1379 - Page 10
f
. Overlay - Although this approach may have the lowest initial cost, this approach may not
I be appropriate on any of the streets over the long term. Existing streets would continue
to have frost/drainage problems, and reflection cracking would appear within the new
I pavement. This approach would include continued higher maintenance cost, and would
I not perform as well. The approach could be considered on Keithson Drive; although
with the sags in the road, thicker bituminous overlay materials would be needed to
- provide a more level surface in sag areas.
I
. Cold In-place Recycling - This approach may have limited results in the Bussard, Amble,
I
and Dunlap Street areas, as again frost/drainage problems would be expected to continue.
I However, this approach may be appropriate for Keithson Drive since the subgrade
already includes a granular borrow layer.
.. . Roadway Reconstruction - If the budget allows, we recommend you consider
I reconstructing Amble Drive, Bussard Court and Dunlap Street so that the subgrade
frost/drainage characteristics can be improved. The subgrade preparation should include
I placing a sand drainage layer. Because portions of the subgrade are reasonably stable,
it should be possible to significantly improve subgrade performance with only a l'
I minimum thickness layer. Where subgrade strength is poor, we recommend increasing
this to 2', as subcuts to improve strength in the lower portion of the 3' subgrade zone
I will already be needed; and improving the currently wet subgrade soils can be difficult,
particularly when underlying soils are of poor quality.
I
RECOMMENDATIONS
I
Sube:rade Preparation/Reconstruction Areas
I We recommend streets being reconstructed undergo sub grade preparation with a select granular
{' layer at the top of subgrade. We recommend this layer be a minimum of l' thick. Therefore,
I
------- ---- -------- -------
I
AET #93-1379 - Page 11 -:
subcuts of existing roadways would need to extend a minimum of I' beneath the bottom of the
proposed aggregate base layer. If soils at this depth are "stable," no further subcutting should I
be needed. To judge stability, we recommend the exposed subgrade soil be subjected to a test
rolling program. Test rolling should be performed with heavier rubber-tired construction I
equipment, such as a loaded dump truck. In general, soils which deflect or rut less than I" can
be considered "stable". I
-
Soils which are not stable at the I' depth should be further subcut to 2' deep. However, we I
recommend subcutting be continuous laterally such that subsurface drainage can be controlled. I
Subcuts should be transitioned at 20: I or flatter. Based on the borings, it appears that you
should plan for the 2' subcuts in at least the northern half of Amble Drive and the western I
portion of Bussard Court.
If the soils at the bottom of the 2' subcut are still not "stable," we recommend that soils be ..
scarified, dried, and recornpacted to a higher level of stability until a test roll is passed; or an I
appropriate geotextile fabric be placed to aid in offsetting the subgrade instability.
We recommend new fill used to replace the excavated clayey soils be a "Select Granular I
Borrow" which is describerl by MnDOT Specification 3149.2B. If cost savings are substantial, I
you could consider the use of "Granular Borrow" (MnDOT Specification 3149.2A), although
drainage properties would be rerluced, which would tend to rerluce longer term performance and I
affect maintenance costs.
I
Placement and compaction of subgrade fill should meet the minimum requirements outlined in
Mn/DOT Specification 2105.3FI (Specified Density Method). This specification requires soils I
placerl within the upper 3' zone of the subgrade be cornpacterl to a minimum of 100% of the
Standard Proctor density (ASTM:D698). Soils placed below this level can have a reduced I
minimum compaction level of 95% of the Standard Proctor density. ..
I
I
.. AET #93-1379 - Page 12
" The above-referenced specification also includes moisture content range requirements. This
I moisture range should be closely evaluated for silty and clayey soils.
I Subgrade Soil Factors/R-Value
No actual R-value testing was conducted to aid in determining subgrade soil strength. However,
I based on our experience and on charts developed by MnDOT, we offer the following chart to
aia your selection of the appropriate soil strength parameter for the pavement section thickness
I design.
I .....................'."....'_...-.-,....,-..
.SoiJI'aCtOtjP~t.Fi~.
.....JJ5~89~.201MnDOT
I .' $lllteAid Manual
2' + Granular
Keithson Drive Borrow over Clays A-2-4 over A-6 75% 45
.. Remaining Streets,
no sand layer Clays A-tJ 110% 20
I Remaining Streets, l' Select Granular A-3 (or near
l' Select Granular over Clays A-3) over A-6 100% 35
Remaining Streets. 2' Select Granular A-3 (or near
I 2' Select Granular over Clays A-3) over A-6 75% 45
I Note: The above applies for the case of reconstruction only. If the subgrade were not prepared to proper stability
within the upper 3' zone, lower values would be recommended.
I Subgrade Drainae:e
I The sub grade approach recommended herein will create a situation in the upper sub grade where
granular soils overlie clayey soils. Because of this, water may become trapped within the
I granular layer. To prevent trapping and build-up of subgrade water, we recommend sand layers
be drained by a means of subsurface drainage. Where roadways are reasonably sloped, water
''e will tend to naturally migrate towards the lower elevation areas. In this case, finger drains
tapped into catch basins can provide an outfall for the sand layer. However, where roads are
flat (such as Amble Drive) we recommend placing parallel drain lines along the length of the
I
I
-- --.- - -----..-.--
I
AET #93-1379 - Page 13 J
road, particularly in those areas where the sand layer is only l' thick. Also, where sand layer I
thicknesses vary, we recommend subsurface drainage in low points of the thicker areas such that I
water does not become trapped.
We have no information regarding whether drainage lines are included in the granular borrow I
layer below Keithson Drive. No excess moisture or water was noted within the sands during I
driIIing suggesting that water is not building up within the granular layer. You may wish to
research the City's plans (if available) for information on whether drainage lines are present. I
If they are not, additional protection would be achieved by constructing finger drains at low
elevation catch basins. I
CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION AND TESTING I
The recommendations in this report are based on the subsurface conditions found at our test II
boring locations. Since the soil conditions can be expected to vary away from the soil boring
locations, we recommend on-site observation by a geotechnical engineer/technician during I
construction to evaluate these potential changes. Soil density testing should also be performed
on new flll placed in order to document that project specifications for compaction and moisture I
have been satisfied. Fill soils imported for subgrade use should also undergo sieve analysis
testing to evaluate whether the material meets soil type requirements. I
EXPLORATION PROCEDURES I
Borine: Location/Elevation Data I
Our subsurface exploration program included drilling 13 test borings on the four existing I
roadways. The general locations of the borings appear on the sketches included in the appendix.
~~ More specific location information as referenced to existing street centerlines is presented on ~
I
I
.~ AET #93-1379 - Page 14
each individual boring log. No surface elevations were obtained, although all borings were
I placed directly on the road surface.
I Field Sampling/Testing Methods
The field sampling methods for the borings are described in the included data sheet under the
I subheading "Standard Penetration/Split Spoon Sampling".
I:: -
,
II Classification Methods
Soil identifications and descriptions shown on the boring logs are judgments based on
I ASTM:D2488-90 (Visual-Manual Procedure). Charts taken from ASTM:D2488-90 are shown
on the appended sheet entitled "Identification of Soils. " Where sieve analysis tests have been
I performed, classification is based on ASTM:D2487-92. The logs also indicate the apparent
II geologic depositional origin, which is interpretive.
I Sample Storage
We will retain representative samples of the soils recovered from the borings for a period of 30
I days. The samples will then be discarded unless you notify us otherwise.
I EXPLORATION PROGRAM LIMITATIONS
I The data derived through this sampling and observation program have been used to develop our opinions
about the subsurface conditions at your site. However, because no exploration program can reveal totally
what is in the subsurface, conditions between borings and between samples and at other times, may differ
I from conditions described in this report. The exploration we conducted identified subsurface conditions
only at those points where we took samples or observed ground water conditions. Depending on the
sampling methods and sampling frequency, every soil layer may not be observed, and some materials or
I layers which are present in the ground may not be noted on the boring logs.
Unless actually observed in a sample, contacts between soil layers are estimated based on the spacing of
samples and the action of drilling tools. Thus, most contacts shown on the logs are approximate, with a
I possible upper and lower limits of contacts defined by the overlying and underlying samples.
{' Cobbles, boulders, and other large objects generally cannot be recovered from test borings, and they may
be present in the ground even if they are not noted on the boring logs.
I
-- ---.------
I
AET #93-1379 - Page 15 J
I
If conditions encountered during construction differ from those indicated by our borings, it may be
necessary to alter our conclusions and recommendations, or to modify construction procedures, and the I
cost of construction may be affected.
The extent and detail of information about the subsurface condition is directly related to the scope of the I
exploration. It should be understood, therefore, that information can be obtained by means of additional
exploration.
STANDARD OF CARE I
-
Our services for your project have been conducted to those standards considered normal for I
services of this type at this time and location. Other than this, no warranty, either express or I
implied, is intended.
CLOSURE I
Report Prepared by: Report Reviewed by: II
l.-t-/ t. -t< ~~ ~W I
Jeffery K. Voyen, PE I
Manager, Geotechnical Engineering Principal Engineer
MN Reg. No. 15928
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
'. I
I z -
/ " M N
CT\
~ I ... 4-<
.,.,
I ~ I (.:) 0
OJ ~ ..-t
I n 0 CT\ )..
~ Cl:l
II r-
Cl:l M 12
~ ..-t
II I ::c
I ~ M ~
'" CT\ I
~ <t t
I I
~
I
~ tIl
l::
:;y 0
....,
I ~ +>
'll
()
~A 0
~ .:l
I '--'
0>
l:: ::..
....,
~ ^' Cl:l >
t..l 0 ~ ;:;
.. ~ a:I
::i ~
OIl t::l
I
I tIl
aJ
:> I
....,
I ^' I
Q
~ aJ
..-t
0 .Q
I ~
......
c
0
tIl
. .c:
~ ~ +>
t..l ..... ... r:l
~ Q)
II ~ .... ......
n 0 <t <=:
g; (,.l
I (I)
i
II c,.?u
==
z:~-
-c;;:u -
it' c::: <....>~::..=
-==
~_:--
==~~
~:z:~
-< =xJ E--
I. rat
-
z - I
M N
'"
J ~ I ~ I
If) ~
~ I
o:J ~ N.
~
-:. ~ ).. i I
3Nld - '" <l:l I
r-
~ <l:l M 1iJ
~ .... I
C>- I ti
- ~ ~ M ~ I
~ ~ '"
'\.) III "l: i:3
0 I
..,
- ul I
3Nnl'lYH -s.
-
4- en
... !:::
0 I
..,
....,
<tl
0
0 I
H
0>
!::: )..
..,
lo.. I-< <l:l :> I
(.J 0 ~
~ ~ ~
t-:l
:::i ~
(I) <::l III
i I
i
,
...., I
Ul I
0.. I
<tl
....
!:::
::l I
I Q
......
....,
I U
I
, "d I
I I-<
^ <tl
I ..- -' " ~ en
I F'l (.J en It!
/ I \ ~ !!l ::l ~ ...... I
~ .... !:::
I 0 i3
,/ ~- ~
i' "l
I ;.. \\ "I
I 1- .... '=- I
1- ~ .
I~ ;.. ..... -/ =0.3
...;,--. z ==
.y z:~-
I 0 -< ~ -
! : ~ '-.l~c:..:t I
i + '" -==
;.. ::x: _:-
, ;:~~
: ) ~:z:::..w ..
I -c~E-
il ~I
i1
"
Ii
"
i'
I
Il AMERICAN
. 1 ENGINEERING SUBSURFACE BORING LOG
TESTING, INC.
. AET lOB NO: 93-1379 LOG OF BORING NO. 1 (P. 1 of 1) I
PROlEC!': PROPOSED STREET IMPROVEMENTS; ARDEN H II.T S. MINNESOTA
I DEPTH sURFACE ELEVATION' GEOLOGY SAMPLE ROC. FIELD & LABORATORY TEST
IN N MC
FEET MATERIAL DESCRIPTION TYPE IN. WC DEN U. PL %.200\
I r, 3" Bituminous pavement r - I I
1 - kS" Base, crushed limestone r - I I
17 M 55 16
I 2 - Fill, mostly silty sand with a little gravel,
brown
FILL 6 M I 55 18
3 16
I 4 - Fill, mostly sandy lean clay with a little gravel
.. .&I'd clayey sand, brown and a little reddish .
5 - brown 4 M 55 16
I
6 END OF BORING
I
I
Location: Keithson Drive, 12'W of centerline,
302'S of Highway 96 eastbound
centerline
I
I
I
I
I
I I
WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS I
DEPTH: DRILLING METHOD NOTE: REFER TO
I DATE TIME SAMPLED CASING CAVE-IN D1m,~ WATER THE ATI ACHED
0-4.5' 3.25" HSA DEPTH DEPTH DEPTH FLUID LEVEL
8110/93 U:20 6.0 4.5 6.0 NONE SHEETS FOR AN
8110193 U:25 6.0 0 4.0 NONE EXPLANATION OF
BORING 8110193 TERMINOLOGY ON
COMPLEI'ED:
CC: CB CA: 55 Rio: 33 THIS LOG
I 4/90
- -- --- -----
11 AMERlCAN
1 ENGINEERING SUBSURFACE BORING LOG I
TESTING, INC.
AET JOB NO: 93-1379 LOG OF BORING NO. 2 In. 1 of 1)
PROJECT: PROPOSED STREET IMPROVEMENTS' ARDEN HILlS. MINNESOTA
DEPTH SURFACE ELEVATION' GEOLOGY SAMPLE REC. FIELD & LABORATORY TESTj
IN N MC
FEET MATERIAL DESCRIPllON TYPE IN. WC DEN LL PL ~-2OQ
,2.5" Bituminous pavement r - I
1 - ,,7.5" Base, mostly crushed limestone r-
16 M 55 18
2 - Fill, mostly silty sand with a little gravel, I
brown FiLL
5 M 55 24
3 Fill, mostly sandy lean clay with a little gravel, 14
4 brown, a little reddish brown I
END OF BORING
- -
I
Note: Boring terminated at 4' to avoid I
possibility of hitting underlying utilities
I
Location: Keithson Drive, II'E of centerline, .-
419'5 of Highway 96 eastbound
centerline I
l I
I
I
I
,
I
i I
DEPTH: DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS NOTE: REFER. TO
DATE TIME SAMPLED CASING CAVE-IN DP IT, ~ ';\?", WATER THE ATIACHED
0-2' 3.25" HSA DEPTH DEPTH DEPTH FLUID LEVEL
8/10/93 12:55 4.0 2.0 4.0 NONE SHEETS FOR.
EXPLANATlO
BORING 8/10/93 I TERMINOLOGY or-4
CO D:
CC: CB CA: SS Rio: 33 THIS LOG
4/90 I
~ AMERICAN
I l ENGINEERING SUBSURFACE BORING LOG
TESTING, INC.
AET JOB NO, 93-1379 LOG OF BORING NO. 3 (D. 1 of 1)
PROJECT, PROPOSED STREET IMPROVEMENTS; ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA
I DEPTH SURFACE ELEVATION, GEOLOGY SAMPLE REC. FIELD & I.AIlORATORY TESTS
IN N MC TYPE IN.
FEET MATERIAL DESCRJPnON WC DEN LL PL %-200
I 3' Bituminous pavement r -
1 - 6.75" Base, crushed limestone r -
6 M 55 16
I 2 - Fill, mostly silty sand with a little gravel, trace
oflean clay, brown
FILL 5 M 55 20
3
I 4 - Fill, mixture of sandy lean clay and clayey
J!!IId with a little gravel, brown and gray
5 - 7 M 55 20
I 6 END OF BORING
I
I
Location: Keithson Drive, 13'E of centerline,
663'5 of Highway 96 eastbound
centerline
I
I
I
I
I
I i
DEPTH, DRILLING METIIOD WATEll LEVEL MEASUREMENl'S NOTE, REFER TO !
I SAMPLED CASING CAVE-IN D~w.Jk. W ATEll
04.5' 3.25" HSA DATE TIME DEPl'H DEPl'H DEPl'H FLUlDL LEVEL THE ATTACHED
8110/93 1:15 6.0 4.0 6.0 NONE SHEETS FOR AN
I 8/10/93 1:20 6.0 0 4.0 NONE EXPLANATION OF
BORING 8/10/93 TERMINOLOGY ON
COMPLlITED,
cc: CB CA, SS Ri., 33 THIS LOG
I 4/90
~ AMERICAN
l ENGINEERING
TESTING, INC. SUBSURFACE BORING LOG I
AET lOB NO: 93-1379 LOG OF BORING NO. 4
PROJECT: PROPOSED STREET IMPROVEMENTS; ARDEN HTT.T ,0;:, MINNESOTA
DEPTH FIELD & LABORATORY TEST
IN SURFACBELEVATION: GEOLOGY N Me SAMPLE REC.
FEET MATBRIAL DESCRIPTION TYPE IN. WC DEN LL PL
7" Bituminous pavement FILL
t 5 M 55 18
2
Lean clay with sand and a little gravel. TILL OR 3 M 5S 18 19
3 reddish brown. soft to very soft (CL) (may be FILL
fill)
4
5 - 1 M 55 6
6 END OF BORING
Location: Amble Drive, 12'W (SW) of
centerline, 169'S (SE) of Korth
Lake Drive centerline
.
!
I
I ! I
DEPTH: DRlLLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS NOTE: REFER TO i
SAMPLED CASING CAVE-IN DRILlING WATER
0-4.5' 3.25"' HSA DATE TIME DEPTH DEPTH DEPTH FLUID L LEVEL THE ATI ACHED
8/10/93 3:05 6.0 4.5 6.0 NONE SHEETS FOR
8/10/93 3:10 6.0 0 4.0 NONE EXPLANATION
BORING
COMPLETED: 8110/93
cc: CB CA: SS Ri: 33 THIS LOG
~ I
n AMERICAN
I riJ ~~~ SUBSURFACE BORING LOG
AET JOB NO: 93-1379 LOG OF BORING NO. 5 (D, 10fn
PROIEC!': PROPOSED STREET IMPROVEMENTS; ARDEN JJTT.T ,C;;, MINNESOTA
I DEPTH FJELD & LABORATORY TEST'
IN SURFACE ELEVATION: GEOLOGY N MC SAMPLE REC. ,
FEET MATERIAL DESCRII'I'ION TYPE IN. WC DEN LL PL ~-200
I 2.25" Bituminous pavement r- FILL
1 _ \4.5" Base, mostly oiled sand, black I ')';~..
'. 5 M 55 18
V;;
I 2 - Clayey sand with a little gravel, grayish r/~. WEATHE D
brown and brown mottled, soft (5C) (may be '.' : TILL OR 6 M 55 14
3 - fill) ~: FILL
140
5 - S"andy lean clay with a little gravel, brown -
I mottled, firm (CL) TILL 10 M 55 10
6 END OF BORING
I
I
Location: Amble Drive, II'E (NE) of
centerline, 251'NW of Pleasant
I Drive centerline
I
I
I
I I
I
I I i
DEPTH: DRJLLING METHOD WATER. LEVEL MEASUREMENTS NOTE: REFER TO i
I SAMPLED CASING CAVE-IN DRILLING WATER '
0-4.5' 3.25" HSA DATE TIME DEPTH DEPTH DEPTH FLUID -;-.,;;;.,. LEVEL THE An ACHED
8/10/93 2:35 6.0 4.5 6.0 NONE SHEETS FOR AN
8/10/93 2:40 6.0 0 4.0 NONE EXPLANATION OF
BORING 8/10/93 TERMINOLOGY ON
COMPLETED:
cc: CB CA: 55 Rio: 33 THIS LOG
I 4/90
11 AMERICAN
1 ENGINEERING SUBSrnwACEBOIDNGLOG I
TESTING, INC.
AET JOB NO: 93-1379 LOG OF BORING NO. 6
PROJECT: PROPOSED STREET IMPROVEMENTS' ARDEN HILlS MINNESOTA
DEPTH SURFACE ELEVATION' GEOLOGY SAMPLE
IN N MC TYPE
FEET MATERIAL DESCRJPTION
2.5' Bituminous pavement
1 4" Base, mostly oiled sand with a little gravel, 16
black 4 M SS 14
2
Fill, mixture of sandy lean clay, lean clay and FiLL 6 M SS 18
3 clayey sand with a little gravel, brown,
grayish brown, gray and a little black
4
-
S 5 M SS 16
6 END OF BORING
Location: Amble Drive, 9'N (NW) of
centerline, 304'E (SE) of Pleasant
Drive centerline
i
,
I
DE.PTH: DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS
DATE TIME SAMPLED CASING CAVE-IN DRlLLING WATER
0-4' 3.25" HSA DEPI'H DEPTIl DEPTIl FLUID LEVEL
8110/93 2:15 6.0 4.5 6.0 NONE SHEETS FOR
8110193 2:20 6.0 0 4.0 NONE EXPLANATION
BORING 8/10/93
COM LETED:
CC: CB CA: SS RJ : 33 THIS LOG
4/90
-----
I] AMERICAN
I 1 ENGINEERING SUB~ACEBOmNGLOG
TESTING, INC.
AEI' lOB NO: 93-1379 LOG OF BORING NO. 7 (D. 1 of 1)
I PROJECT: PROPOSED STREET IMPROVEMENTS; ARDEN H II.T ."', MINNESOTA
DEPTH SURFACE ELEVATION: GEOLOGY SAMPLE REG. FIELD 8< LABORATORY TESTS
IN N MC
FEEr MATERIAL DESCR.IPI'lON TYPE IN. WC DEN LL PL %-200
I ~ 4' Bituminous pavement - FILL
1 - r\rill, mostly sandy lean clay with a little gravel,
brown and reddish brown I ~ 6 M 55 18
I 2- -
.
3 - Lean clay with sand with a little gravel, 7 M 55 24
I reddish brown, soft to firm (CL) ~TILL
4 - ~
- -
S - 11 M 55 18
I
6 END OF BORING
I
I
Location: Amble Drive, 11 'NE of centerline,
156'SE of Amble Circle centerline
I
I
I
I I
I
I
,
,
I I I
. i
I : ,
DEPTH: DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENI'S NOTE: RH'ER TO ;
DATE TIME SAMPLED CASING CAVE-IN DRlLLIN~h WATER THE ATIACHED
0-4.5' 2.25' HSA DEPIH DEPIH DEPTH FLUID LEV LEVEL
8/10/93 1:50 6.0 4.5 6.0 NONE SHEETS FORAl"
I 8/10/93 1:55 6.0 0 3.5 NONE EXPLANATION OF
BOR!!:l.G_ 8110/93 TERMINOLOGY ON
CO :
CC: CB CA: SS Ria: 33 THIS LOG
I
4/90
I] AMERICAN
l ENGINEERING SUBSURFACE BORING LOG I
TESTING, INC. AETJOBNO: 93-1379 LOG OF BORING NO. 8 (n. 1 of l' "i
PROJECT: PROPOSED STREET IMPROVEMENTS: ARDEN HILLS. MINNESOTA
DEJ7H SURFACE ELEVATION: GEOLOGY N MC SAMPLE REC. FIELD&LABORATORYTESTSI
FEET MATERIAL DESCRIPTION TYPE IN. WC DEN LL PL %-200
2. Bituminous pavement - I
1 - 4. Base, mostly sand with silt and gravel,
brown 12 M SS 14
2 - FILL -
Fill, mixture of sandy lean clay, clayey sand
3 - and lean clay with a little gravel, brown, gray 5 M SS 12 18
and a little black
4 - I
-tlrganic clay, black (OL) '" TOPSOIL. .
5 ;;;: FINE IIUM 6 W SS 12
Silty clay, brownish gray, soft (CL-ML) ALLUV I
6 '/
END OF BORING
.OR SWAMP DEPOSIT I
I
Location: Bussard Court, 10'S and 30'E of
center of cul-de-sac
I
I
I
I I I
" I
i
I ,
,
,
DEITH: DRll.LING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS NOTE: REFER TO
DATE TIME SAMPLED CASING CAVE-IN DRlI;t~~, WATER THEATIAC~
0-4.5' 2.25" HSA DEPTH DEITH DEITH FLUID ~" LEVEL
8/9/93 12:40 6.0 4.5 4.9 NONE SHEETS FOR.
8/9/93 12:46 6.0 0 4.0 NONE EXPLANATIO
BORING 8/10/93 TERMINOLOGY ON I
COMPLETED:
CC: JF CA: EG Ri.: 7 THIS LOG
4/90 I
I] AMERICAN
I 1 ENGINEERING
TESTING, INC. SUBSURFACE BORING LOG
I AETIOBNO: 93-1379 LOG OF BORING NO. 9 (p.1 ofl) I
PROJECT: PROPOSED STREET IMPROVEMENTS; ARDEN HIUS. MINNESOTA
DEPTH SURFACE ELEVATION' GEOLOGY SAMPLE ROC FIELD & LABORATORY TESTS
rn N MC .
FElIT MATERIAL DESCRIPTION TYPE IN. wc DEN LL PL fl-200
I 1\2. Bituminous pavement r-
1 _ ,,10. base, mostly sand with silt and gravel, f-
I Ibrown FILL 14 M SS 14
I 2 -, Fill, mostly sandy lean clay with a little gravel,
\~ray and brown I
3 _ 14 M SS 14
I_Sandy lean clay with a little gravel, brown TILL
4 mottled, firm (CL)
I 5- - ~. 6 M SS l~
6 END OF BORING
I
I
Location: Bussard Court, TN of centerline,
34TW of Snelling Avenue
I centerline
I
I
I
I I
I I I
1 I
! I
DEPTH: DRILLlNGMETIIOD WATER LEVEl-MEASUREMENTS NOTE: REFERTO
I SAMPLED CASING CAVE-IN DIULL1N~_. WATER
0-4.5' 2.25" HSA DATE TIME DEPTH DEPTH DEPTH FLUID LEVIo.L LEVEL THE ATIACHED
8/9/93 1:25 6.0 4.5 6.0 NONE SHEETS FOR AN
8/'/93 1:31 6.0 0 4.1 NONE EXPLANATION OF
~g~&ro: 8m'3 TERMINOLOGY ON
I CC: JF CA: EG Rio: 7R THIS LOG
4/90
------
~ AMERICAN I
1 ENGINEERING SUBSURFACE BORING LOG
TESTING, INC.
AET JOB NO: 93-1379 LOG OF BORING NO. 10
PROJECT: PROPOSED STREET IMPROVEMENTS; ARDEN HIT.I .l;. MINNESOTA
DEI'T'H SURFACE ELEVATION: FIELD &0 LABORATORY
IN GEOLOGY N MC SAMPLE REC.
FEET MATERIAL DESCRIPTION TYPE IN. wc DEN LL PL
2" Bituminous pavement
1 6" Base, mostly sand with silt and gravel,
brown 11 M SS 15
2 Fill, mostly sandy lean clay with a little gravel, FILL
gray and brown
M SS 12
3 Clayey sand with a little gravel, brown
4 mottled, firm (SC)
5 ~dy lean clay with a little gravel, brown
mottled, hard (CL) TILL 20 M SS 15
6 END OF BORING
Location: Bussard Court, 6tS of centerline,
78'W of Snelling Avenue centerline
I
-
!
il
]1
DEPTH: DRILLING METHOD WATER. LEVEL MEASlJREMENTS NOTE: REFER TO I
DATE TIME SAMPLED CASING CA VB-IN DRILLING WATER. THE AITACHED II
0-4.5' 2.25" HSA DEPI1I DEPI1I DEPI1I FLUID LEVEL
8/9/93 2:18 6.0 4.5 6.0 NONE SHEETS FOR AJ
8/9/93 2:20 6.0 0 4.3 NONE EXPLANATION
BORING 8/9/93
COMPLETED:
CC: JF CA: EG Ri : 7 THIS LOG
4/90
I] AMERICAN
I 1 ENGINEERING SUB~ACEBOmNGLOG
TESTING, INC.
AET JOB NO, 93-1379 LOG OF BORJNG NO. 11 (P. 1 of 1) I
PROJECT, PROPOSED STREET IMPROVEMENTS; ARDEN 1III.I.<;;, MINNESOTA
I DEP11I SURFACE ELEVATION' GEOLOGY SAMPLE FIELD '" LABORATORY TEST'
IN N MC REC.
FEET MATERIAL DESCRIP110N TYPE IN. WC DEN LL PL %.200
I 3.25" Bituminous pavement r --
I - 4.75" Base, mostly sand with silt and gravel, -
brown FILL 13 M SS 14 ,
i
I 2 - Fill, mostly sandy lean clay with a little gravel, ~ I
\llray
3 - ~TILL 12 M SS 15
I 4 - Sandy lean clay with a little gravel, brown to
brown and Iigbt gray mottled, firm (CL)
- ~
5 - 12 M SS 12
I
6 END OF BORING
I
I
Location: Dunlap Street, 10'E of centerline,
81'S of Cannon Avenue centerline
I
I
I
I
I ! I
I
I I I
I I
DEP11I: DRILLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS NOTE, REFER TO
W 0-4.5' 2.25" HSA DATE TIME SAMPLED CASING CAVE-IN DRILLINYEL WATER THE ATI ACHED
DEPIlI DEP11I DEPIlI FLUID LEV LEVEL
8/9/93 11:15 6.0 4.5 5.8 NONE SHEETS FOR AN
8/9/93 11 :20 6.0 0 4.0 NONE EXPLANATION OF
I BORJNG TERMINOLOGY ON
COMPLETED, 8/9/93
CC, JF Ck EG Rio, 7R THIS LOG
I 4/90
-.---
11 AMEPJCAN
1 ENGINEERING SUBS~ACEBO~GLOG I
TESTING, INC.
"
AETJOBNO: 93-1379 LOG OF BoRJNG NO. 12 (D. 1 of 1) J
PROJECT: PROPOSED STREET IMPROVEMENTS' ARDEN H II.T." MINNESOTA
DEJ1H SURFACE ELEVATION' GEOLOGY N MC SAMPLE ROC. FJELD&UBORATORYTESTI I
FEET MATERIAL DESCRJPTJON TYPE IN. WC DEN LL PL f,l;-200
,1.5' Bituminous pavement r=
1 - \f.5' Base, mostly sand with silt and gravel, r - MI I I
brown 17 SS 15
2 - Fill, mixture of sandy lean clay and clayey
sand with a little gravel, gray, brown and a FILL ~SS I
little black 11 14
3 . :' .: COARSE
Silty sand, fine to medium grained, brown,
medium dense (SM) . . :: ALLUVIUl\!
4 - I
....
s - E1ayey sand with a little gravel, light ;; .: WEATHERl D .
brownish gray, very soft (sq ~/,:' TILL 4 W SS 14
6 .<j : I
END OF BORING
I
I
Location: Dunlap Street, 9'E of centerline,
127'S of Tiller Lane centerline
I
I
I
I
,
,
I
,
DEPTH: DIUll.lNG METIlOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENTS NOTE: REFER TO I
SAMPLED CASING CA VE.IN DP",:~~~, WATER
0-4.5' 2.25" HSA DATE TIME DEPTH DEPTH DEPTH FLUlD LEVEL ru'm^"":J
8/9/93 10:28 6.0 4.5 5.7 4.5 SHEETS FOR AN
8/9/93 10:34 6.0 0 4.3 3.8 EXPLANATION
BORING TERMINOLOGY ON J
COMPlETED: 8/9/93
cc: JF CA: EG Rio: 7 THIS LOG
4/90 I
I] AMERICAN
. 1 ENGINEERING SUBSURFACE BORING LOG
TESTING, INC.
. AEI' lOB NO: 93-1379 LOG OF BORING NO. 13 (P. 1 of 1) I
I
. PROJECT: PROPOSED STREET IMPROVEMENTS; ARDEN HILlS. MINNESOTA
DEI'fH SURFACE ELEVATION' GEOLOGY SAMPLE REC. FIELD &. LABORATORY TESTS
IN N MC TYPE IN.
FEIIT MATERIAL DESCRIPTION WC DEN LL PL %-200
. \2.5' Bituminous pavement r-
1- \~' Base, mostly sand with silt and gravel, r -
brown FILL 20 M SS 14
. 2 - Fill, mostly clayey sand with a little gravel, I
\gray and brown
3 - 12 M SS 12
. TILL
4 - Sandy lean clay with a little gravel, brown
mottled, firm (eLl
5 - - .
. 12 M SS 15
6 END OF BORING
.
.
Location: Dunlap Street, 8'E of centerline,
84'N of Ingerson Road centerline
I
I
.
.
. I
,
I
. I
I .
DEl'I'H: DRlLLING METHOD WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENIS NOTE: REFER TO :
. DATE TIME SAMPLED CASING CA VB.IN DIULLIN~EL WATER THEATIACHED I
0-4.5' 2.25" HSA DEPTH DEPTH DEPTH FLUID LEV LEVEL
8/9/93 9:38 6.0 4.5 5.7 NONE SHEIITS FOR A. 'I
8/9/93 9:40 6.0 0 4.1 NONE EXPLANATION OF
BORING 8/9/93 TERMINOLOGY ON
COMPLETED:
. CC: JF CA: EG Rio: 7 THIS LOG
4/90
---.-
.
..
.
REPORT OF SIEVE ANALYSIS TESTS .
PROJECT: REPORTED TO: .
KEITHSON DRIVE MAIER STEWART & ASSOCIATES .
ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA
ATIN: GREG STONEHOUSE
AET JOB NO.: 93-1379 DATE: AUGUST 16, 1993 .
TEST METHOD: ASTM:D422 .
RESULTS: .
.. -........-.-..".,..,..
..-... .,"........,......-".-........-.".-..."...-...-.".."... II
...:aORINGN1JMBER(. Composite from :aorings #1, 2 and 3
.... .......>........ ................... ........ .. . .....................((
../(( ., Below base to 2' deep
I SIEVESIZEORNUMtlERllpERcEN'f]';.\ssINGBY>wEi:GHl' I .
I" 100 I
3/4" 98
1/2" 95 .
3/8" 92
#4 89 .
#10 84
#20 76 .
#40 61
#100 30 .
#200 19
I ASTM>CLASSIEICATION I (SM) I .
SYMBOL . ..
.
I
-. FIELD SAMPLlNG AND TESTING METHODS
I Standard PenetrationlSolit-Sooon Samolin2 (ASTM:Dl5861. A steel split-barrel sampling tube is driven
into the soil with a 140-pound hammer dropped from a height of 30" (the hammer is dropped onto a drill
I rod attached to the sampler). The number of hammer blows required to drive the sampler tube 12" into
the ground (after an initial set of 6") is recorded as the standard penetration resistance (N-value) of the
I soil for the sampling interval. Penetration of less than 18" is permitted under ASTM:DI586. When
driving is complete, the sampler is retracted and opened, and soil samples are taken from the tube. The
I bore hole is advanced between sampling intervals with an auger, casing, or rotary drill bit with drilling
flui&. In frozen ground, split barrel samples are not normally taken. Rather, soil samples from the
. ~
I frozen zone are taken from the flights of the auger.
I Thin-Walled Tube Samolin2 (ASTM:Dl58TI. Thin-walled tubes are fitted with a ball check valve at the
top, are (slowly and steadily) pushed into the soil, then retracted.
I Rock Carin!!: (ASTM:D21l3). A diamond or carbide bit on a core barrel is rotated into rock to the
. desired depth, then retracted. Rock samples are taken from the inner tube.
I AU2er Borin!!:s. Two procedures are available in machine drilling auger borings: "spinning" and
"pulling. "
I . Soinnin2 _ The auger is drilled into the ground in increments of 5' or less. The auger is then
I spun rapidly. Soil "rides up" the flights of the auger to the ground surface, where samples are
taken. In general, this method results in approximate identification of the soil profile above the
I ground water table, but it can be very misleading below the water table, panicularly in sandy and
gravelly soils.
I . Pullin2 _ The auger is screwed into the ground with minimum "riding up" of soil, rotation is
I stopped and then the auger withdrawn to the ground surface. The general soil profile can be
observed, and samples of materials held on the auger are taken. In general, this method causes
less soil mixing and is considered more accurate than the spinning method.
~
I
----
BORING LOGS ABBREVIATIONS. NOTATIONS AND SYMBOlS I
(Page 1 of 2) J
B,H,N: Size of flush-joint casing
BX: BX double tube core barrel I
Bulk: Disturbed sample obtained from auger, drill cuttings, or excavating machine
AC: At completion of boring I
CA: Crew assistant
CAS: Pipe casing, number indicates nominal diameter in inches I
CC: Crew chief
CONS:_ One-dimensional consolidation test I
COT: Clean-{)ut tube
D: Sampled soil appears dry I
DC: Drive casing; number indicates nominal diameter in inches
DEN: Dry density, pounds per cubic foot I
DM: Drilling mud or bentonite slurry
E,: Pressuremeter modulus in tons per square foot I
F: Sampled soil appears frozen
FA: Machine flight auger; P - Pulling Procedure; S - Spinning Procedure; number indicates outside .
diameter in inches
HA: Hand auger; number indicates outside diameter I
HSA: Hollow-stem auger; number indicates inside diameter in inches
HYD: Hydrometer analysis I
JW: Jetting water
LL: Liquid limit I
M: Sampled soil appears moist
MC: Column used to describe moisture condition of samples and for the ground water level symbol I
MR: Mud rotary drilling with fluid and roller or drag bit
N (BPF): Standard penetration resistance (N-value) in blows per foot (see notes) I
PERM: Coefficient of penneability (K) test; F - Field; L - Laboratory
PL: Plastic limit
q,.: Pocket penetrometer strength, tons per square foot I
qo: Static cone bearing pressure, tons per square foot ~
q.: Unconfined compressive strength, pounds per square foot
-Q: NQ or PQ wireline core barrel
R: Electrical resistivity, ohm-cms
I
-----
I
BORING LOGS ABBREVIATIONS. NOTATIONS AND SYMBOLS
I (page 2 or 2)
I~C: In split-spoon (see notes) and thin-walled tube sampling, the recovered length (in inches) of sample.
In rock coring, the length of core recovered (expressed as percent of the total core run). Zero
indicates no sample recovered.
I REV: Revert drilling fluid
RQD: Rock Quality Designator in percent (aggregate length of core pieces 4' or more in length as a
I percent of total core run)
SA: Sieve analysis
I S.: Disturbed shear strength in pounds per square foot
S.: Undisturbed shear strength in pounds per square foot
-
SS: Standard split-spoon sampler (steel; lo/a' inside diameter; 2' outside diameter); unless indicated
I otherwise
TW: Thin-walled tube; number indicates inside diameter in inches
I VANE: Vane shear strength; L - Laboratory; F - Field
WC: Water content, as percent of dry weight
I W: Sampled soil appears wetlwaterbearing
WASH: Sample of material obtained by screening returning rotary drilling fluid or by taking a split-spoon
IIwAT: sample of material which has collected inside the bore hole after "falling" through drilling fluid
Water
I WH: Sampler advanced by static weight of drill rod and 140-pound hammer
WR: Sampler advanced by static weight of drill rod
I 94mm: 94 millimeter wireline core barrel
-200: Percent of material finer than #200 sieve
I ~: Water level indicated in boring
I NOTES:
1. In highly resistant material:
I . The standard penetration test consists of driving the sampler with a 140-pound hammer and
counting the number of blows applied in each of three 6' increments of penetration. If the
I sampler is driven less than 18', as permitted in ASTM-DI586, the blows for each
complete 6' increment and for each partial increment is recorded on the boring log. For
partial increments, the number of blows is shown over a bar (-) or slash (I) and the partial
penetration less than 6' is shown to the nearest inch below the bar or slash.
I . The length of sample recovered, as shown on the "REC' column, may be greater than the
{' distance indicated in the N column. The disparity is because the N-value is recorded
below the initial 6' set (unless partial penetration defined in ASTM:D1586 is encountered)
whereas the length of sample recovered is for the entire sampler drive.
I
------- ------- ---
IDENTIFICATION ,
OF SOILS .
('I ISUAL-,'1AMUAL PROC-EDURE)
..,~,_.~w..~.... GW ..:;l"........._W.II"'l1.......".....1 ..
---~IS'lo...... _ ~oNl.,....... I..... ........-
/- '_W~_ GP ~ <15"......-"_IT,._...,,.....
~,S'l.w....-.._iT......M1t..ul....._w.... . .
:::'\'"'-<---- ---------:::::::: GW-GM "_______ <l!5'L......_W.II~f.....lfn.I_......oI...
0 ~1!5'1...""'-'N..~~ ....'..1_.."....._ ........
GW-GC _____ <1""-.......-W...1'.ot....'....._c..,.
::'".........-""...,.._..'....1...."01..1'....._ .
"_iT I'..... _______ 1-..-....1..... lot" GP-GM ______ <..",......-~_"t....._,....J.......WI
~1.,,'50.......-.._lV.,..,.."...........1fI1_.._
r"""I-CT"OI CH GP-GC <l$"!l;Ioo....-I"_IT"'~"..oN........IW...
----~'5"'..""'-'_lV "Id"'t'..d..."..cw~ .......-
:J.......wl....MH GM <l"'I....,..._~.jTY"'...1 " .
--.:...~15"'...tod-:;...t.y t'...d....".....,
~15~1~. . GC
,_I~c:I.....CH <1".........._0.."....".....
~::t5'1.IoooN_C1.o".1't.....f_il".."'"
-<:::::::"".........IdIcI SW <1S'lo"....-W'.i1""'oo.........
/0'-' .__,,_ SP ~'~15'1. ",",- w.II""'...".....s _.... ,Un' .
<:15'1..,...1-..._.'1'.,.............
-;:;:1$". ,...",~_"'_.y ...04......-,....,. ,..-I
--=:'.......'-C\.... ""'H SW-SM <1S,,- 11...1 __W.d-t'..,......... ..". ...,
<w........ SW'SC ------ 2.1S'I. ,,1..1_ "'.II...~.v...... ...... IOU ..... "ntl .
S.1HO ,,_,.C~ ., CH <1!5'1i"...I_"'.1lI11'.o....wfOCl....."c1~,..
. "::''\~'~ ... ----~'i" IU..I-- W.II1"ooI..........., .... cl.oy uod .....1
~r~'''M~'' MH SP~SM ____ <1$'\,......I_iI'M'~"oo,loo$w.......itlll~1
'_tv "JidI4l--- -~15'\ I'.nl-"_I" tf~ "".... .....,...It HId "...1
Sp.SC <lS'I. 1....I_.._I'I'.'.sId............" d..,
1......,..Ct,wCH ___,:=:lS'l.'....I_'_Iy.."""......,....ltftlll..o.,aNt"I...' .
"....,.M\..'.1otJo4 SM '-::15,",,...I_~"IY"'n4
:::.IS'!l.r...... SC ~~l~' I......l-:;M.'I' """""01111,....1
li......Ct,.'CH <tS"I....._CI.1'.......1'Id
-~15'l, ......I_CI.1'..... ~rw.I_I.".'....1 .
< <,Q'4 ,1", N.. 100 __ <15'4,1". N.. 200 Lean d~.,.
~ I"nd ~% qUYc( - lun cl.;,.,.. wilh ~",d
15.25% lIlY1 .'10. 200 ~% ~nd <% ~u'Ytl- '-un cl~y wieh gr.a....l
CL
~%:I-Ind ~';C.olr;'.J.,tl ~<t5~1'a'.1 s..ndy lun d;ay II
';::JO~ ~hn No. 200 ~15~g,u.1 ~ndy lun c1..y ""illt 1uul
% und <% -;u'Iel -..:.. <151. Ulnd C,nelly r4t~n clay
';:'15%i-ar-..J CUII~lIy t.~n cl.y with ~nd
< <:lQ'4 ,I", N..1oo ~ <15'4 .1". N..1oo iill .
1S.:ZS"-, ph"1 No, 200 ~ ~ und?:.~ gn,,~1 Siu wicn und
ML 'f..~nd<"il.J.,.1 Sllt.....h"~t.aul
~'JC.~I"od2:%QI,'l.,tl ~ <t5~ ~'.J,.I ~ndy lilt
>J.O~ ;JIU1 No. ZOO 2:15X 1UI"tl ::.andy 1ilt wit" 1"'T~1 .
- ~ und <% iuul :.. <15'4 ~nd Cnlllly ~ill
~15~ I.lrwt Cr.ully till with Lolnd
<CQ'4.,".No.100 ~ <l5'4.I".N..1oo rlt cl.JY .
15-2S~ ;::dU1 No. ZOO ~ und 2;%. 11'1..1 F n ,lilY wil" und
CH . -%, urw:i <% ~uul FHC.I.Jy",ilh1U.,.J
~~ und >~ol i1'l'tl -.:.. <15% I:Itud $.Indv h,t c:l.ay
~JO% j)lu' No.:Zoo - ~15%i1'.)yd $.JI'dy 'al c:l.JY WII" ~u,..1
%....hd <~ "nd ~ <15% u.nd Cunlly I.Jtc:!.J.,.. .
~1S% wnd C,..nlly 'H c:l.y wilh wr.d
< <JQ'4 ,I.. ._.. 200 --.:.. <15'4,,". N.. 200 iH.Jlti(;llh
lS.ZS'!4 ph.I' No. 200 -------:.. %. u~ ~"" ~rl,.1 El.l1lic lilt ....il" \.And .
MH ~ wild <-=. 1uul EI.J1ti(;lill wlll'r~'ucl
~ % urld ~% or 9ta.~1 ________ <t5'%.1111111 s....,nd., tl.nli.c lill
~1S~ 1U.1I s..ndy cI.llie lill.ill" ;"...1
2":.0'" ,lut ~o. 200 Cunily tJutic: lill
~ und <% lU1'I1 <'5~ loand
--2:,15'-' '-1M C'oI.HiIy d..llic. ~ill ......iln I-lro.Q .
< '''0... "",N.. 200 __ <1,...,1".._..:00 Or1.ruc loCI.!
15-ZS-'l. ~h" No. ~OO ~ und >~ ~n..1 Or,ln.c 1oCI.1 _ilh I.oInd .
OLlOH ~,., '1.11"1<1 <~ ;nut _ O'~ln,c "':ltl wilh 7".1i
-.:::::::::: ~..rod~";' 11,.,.1 <1!";C, ;n..l S."dy Q"."'c J.Q.I
~JO":l;. ,,1"'1 No. ZOO -,:?:,lS"'; iI,..1 5..at\4y oro.....c: 1oO.1_;tl'l ~r.J,d ..
~ !.IN <~ ;u..1 -.:... <1'S'1, '-It'>4 ';::1'.,.11'1" OflJ.a",C \00.1
:2:.1So:.wtK! C,.....lly C1'';-I"ic..oLl .iLl' ",1'14
",",orr-i'tt"UltulnJ.n ~ ~ft Mtim.l1i", ~m(l"'f\1Jt ,(r.~ ~"-1,J.r\d y:1~d tcIl"~ "'nrMl J ~~.
- --.
.
I
~
: l~i~~"I'i~1rm~_t~l'~;;:&~:!J!:]1
Grain Siu Gravel Percental!es
I Term ASTM AASHTO Term Percent
Boulders Over 12" Over 3" A Little Gravel 3%-15%
I Cobbles 3" 10 12" - With Gravel 15 %-30%
Gravel #4 sieve to 3" #10 sieve to 3" Gravelly 30%-50%
- Sahd #200 to #4 sieve #200 to #10 sieve .
I Fines (silt Pass #200 sieve Pass #200 sieve
& clay)
LaveriDl! Notes Color Notes
I Laminations - Differing material or color layers less than Mottled - Presence of spots or streaks of
1/2" thick one or more colors in a soil mass
I of another predominant color.
Stratifications - Differing material or color layers greater
than 1/2" thick Marbled - Presence of two or more distinct
colors in approximately equal
II Lenses - Small pockets/inclusions of differing amounts, but not blended.
material
I Consistencv of Clavs and Silts Relative Densitv of Coarse Grained Soils
Term N-Value. BPF Term N-Value. BPF
I Very Soft 0-4 Very Loose 0-4
Soft 5-8 Loose 5-10
Firm 9-15 Medium Dense 11-30
I Hard 16-30 Dense 31-50
Very Hard Greater than 30 Very Dense Greater than 50
I Fiber Content of Peat (ASTM D44271 Orl!'anic Descrintion (ASTM D24881
Term Fiber Content (Visual Estimate) Non-peat soils are described as organic, if soil
is judged to have sufficient organic content to
I Fibric Greater than 67 % influence the soil properties.
Hemic 33-67 %
i Sapric Less than 33 9li
. I
I -..-......,. ..---..."..---,'------.--"--'.'",'-..-.,...,-,' - -,,-,-.,-- . ..... .,'-'-- '
. .......AMERtCANEN(;:[N~;~..uNGrl:S'I1NG;iNci.
I
,.
I
-
--
I
GEOLOGIC TRRMINOLOGY
Th, gool"" ,~,,,pti'" i""i~'" ", ",MOO' ,_,ti<>,," origin" ,.,ti""bi, _. Goolo~' J
identification is interpretive. Judgment is sometimes limited due to small or disturbed samples. I
General categories of geologic deposits, and descriptive information is as follows:
ALLUVIUM COARSE: Sandy (and gravelly). Stratified. Deposited I
from fast moving waters in streams and rivers.
(Includes glacial outwash.) I
FINE: Clayey and/or silty. Stratified. Deposited
from slow moving waters in streams, rivers, I
_ lakes and ponds.
MIXED: Combination of Fine and Coarse Alluvium. I
BEDROCK: Wide range of characteristics: from bard, dense, consolidated rock; to
soft, compressible, and unconsolidated soil-like material. I
FILL CONTROLLED: Compact, uniform material; inorganic; no
debris. I
UNCONTROLLED: Loose or variable density. Mixture of soil
types. Often contains debris and organic II
material.
TILL: Normally contains a wide range of grain sizes, from boulders through I
clay. Usually non-stratified. Deposited directly from glaciers.
LOESS: Silty. Non-stratified. Upper layer. Deposited from wind. I
SLOPEW ASH: Organic and/or inorganic material washed from slopes and redeposited.
SWAMP DEPOSITS: Peat, muck and marl, and organic soil. Formed through accumulation I
of organic material under water.
TOPSOIL: Contains both inorganic and organic material. Upper, black layer of I
soil. Formed by weathering of inorganic soil and accumulation of
organic material.
TUMBLEROCK OR Dominantly gravel, boulders and rock slabs. Deposited from gravity flow I
COLLUVIUM: down hills or cliffs.
WEATHERED BEDROCK: Bedrock which bas been substantially weathered through disintegration I
or decomposition. Texture and composition grades into bedrock.
WEATHERED SOIL: Texture, composition, and position is intermediate between topsoil and I
non-weathered soil. ..
I
I BORING WGS: GROUND WATER INFORMATION
__GrOUnd water information is shown under "Water Level Measurements" at the bottom of the log and in the "Me"
I (moisture condition) column on the right side. Because the presence of water in the soil and the level of the ground
water table can change over time, the information presented is accurate only for the date and time the observations
I and measurements were made.
I The following information (in addition to the sampling date and time) appears under "Water Level Measurements:"
I . The sampled depth, which is the lowest depth of soil sampling at the time of measurement.
-
I . The casing depth, which is the depth to the bottom of the casing or hollow-stem auger at the time of
measurement.
I . The cave-in depth, which is the depth at which the measuring tape stops in the bore hole.
I . The water level, which is the point in the bore hole at which free-standing water is encountered with the
. measuring tape.
. The drilling fluid level is similar to the water level, except that the liquid in the bore hole is drilling fluid.
I
I The water level, drilling fluid level, and cave-in depths are measured with a weighted measuring tape.
I The "Me" column indicates the moisture condition of soil samples. A "n" in the column means that a soil sample
appears dry (absence of moisture, dusty, dry to touch); "M" means moist (damp but no visible water), and "W"
I means wet (visible free water). An "F" is used if the sample is frozen.
I The water level symbol -L in the "Me" column indicates the estimated position of the ground water table in
the boring. The absence of the water level symbol on a log does not necessarily mean that ground water was not
encountered or that the water table or piezometric surface was DOt penetrated.
I
Overall, determining the position of the ground water table is an interpretative process that depends on such factors
I as water level measurements, the presence and type of drilling fluid, the condition of samples, subsurface
f conditions, site conditions, whether the bore hole is covered or open, and weather conditions. Because of these
factors and those noted previously, the actual ground water level in the field may vary from that shown on the
boring logs.
I