Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCCP 09-25-1995 - . 'w ff14L -- . AGENDA -- I ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEETING NEW BRIGHTON COUNCIL CHAMBERS I MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 25,1995,7:30 P.M. 7:30 PM I. Call to order/roll call I 7:30 PM 2. Agenda Adoption 7:35 PM " Approval of Minutes I J. a. September 11, 1995, Regular Council Meeting I 7:40 PM 4. Consent Calendar a. Claims/Payroll b. Brad Ernst Appointment I 7:45 PM 5. Public Comments I 7:50 PM 6. Unfinished and New Business. a. Holiday Inn Site Plan, Case #95 - 6(a) I~ b. Laumeyer SUP, Case #95-21 c. Bethel SWM Appeal d. Resolution #95-65, Accepting Bid and Authorizing Execution of Contract in the I Matter of The Arden Manor Watermain Improvement of 1995 e. Resolution #95-64, Approving the Plans and Specifications and Ordering the Advertisement for Bids in the Matter of The 1995 Storm Water I Management Program f. Perry Park Pay Estimate #1 g. County Road F Pay Estimate #2 I h. 1995 Street Improvements Pay Estimate # 1 l. Army Reserve Memorandum of Agreement J. Proclamation - Cities Week Proclamation I k. TCAAP Update 9:00 PM 7. Administrator Comments I 9:10PM 8. Council COIllIl).ents I 9:30 PM 9. Adjourn I. The above times may vary depending upon length of issue discussion. I I - ~ ~ " . ... . --- Seotember Meetings October Meetin!!s September 4 - HOLIDAY October 4 - Planning Commission . September 6 - Planning Commission October 10 - Council Meeting - 7:30 P.M. September 11 - Council Meeting - 7: 30 P _ M. October 18 - Human Rights Committee - 7:30 P.M. September 20 - Human Rights Committee - 7:30 P.M. October 18 - Economic Dev. Committee - 8:00 A.M. . September 20 - Economic Develop. Committee-8:oo A.M. October 19 . Council Worksession - 7:30 P.M. September 21 - Public Safety/Works Committe-7:30 P.M. October 19 - Public Safety/Works Committee - 7:30 P.M. September 21 - Council Worksession - 4:30 P.M. October 24 - Park/Rec. Committee. 7:00 P.M. . September 25 . Council Meeting - 7: 30 P. M. October 26 . Finance Committee- 7:30 P.M. September 26 - Park & Rec. Committee - 7:00 P.M. October 30 - Council Meeting - 7:30 P.M. September 28 - Finance Comittee - 7:30 P.M. . . . . ~. . . . . .. . . - .. . I - . . .. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS MEMORANDUM . DATE: September 20, 1995 . TO: Mayor and City Council Brian Fritsinger, City Administrat~ FROM: . SUBJECT: Administrator Comments for September 25, 1995, Council Meeting . 1. Af,!enda Items a. Approval of Minutes . The Council is asked to approve the Minutes of the September II, 1995, Regular Council Meeting. . 2. b. Consent Calendar 1. ClaimslPavroIl - The Council is asked to approve claims in the amount of $93,732.15 and payroll for the most recent period ended. The Council . should note the payment to Maier Stewart & Associates in the amount of $47,534.18. Note the Midwest Asphalt, Valley Paving and Veit & .- Company pay estimates are not reflected in the above claims total. 2. Brad Ernst Appointment - Mr. Ernst has requested to be appointed to the . opening on the Public Safety/Works Committee. The Council may wish to appoint Mr. Ernst to this Committee for the remainder of 1995. . c. Unfinished and New Business 1. Plannin~ Case #95-6(at - Holidav Inn The Council is asked to approve the landscape plan for the Holiday . Inn. This plan was previously approved with a unaminous vote of the Planning Commission. . 2. Planning Case #95-21. - Laumever The City Council is asked to approve the Special Use Permit for .. the operation of a Antique Store at 3540 New Brighton Road. This . SUP was previously approved with a unanimous vote of the Planning Commission. . 3. Bethel Collef,!e SWM Appeal The Council is asked to approve the appeal from Bethel College. . The Council should recall that Bethel originally appealed its SWM fees about a year ago. Due to the potential perceived conflict with .. the Ogren proposal, Bethel had requested final action be delayed. . . . 4. Arden Manor Watermain Imllrovements. Resolution 95-65 .. The Council is asked to adopt Resolution 95-65 which accepts the bids and authorizes execution of a contract for the Arden Manor Watermain Improvement project. . The City of Arden Hills has received bids for the proposed Arden Manor watermain connection project. The low bidder, Dave . Perkins Contracting, Inc. bid $63,860. The Army intends to start this project as soon as possible. The Army has verbally agreed to . reimburse the City for all costs associated with this project. 5. 1995 Storm Water Management Program. Resolution 95-64 The Council is asked to adopt Resolution 95-64 approving the . plans and specifications and ordering bids for the 1995 Storm Water Management Program. . 6. 1995 Street Improvements Pay Estimate #1 The Council is asked to approve pay estimate number one (I) in . the amount of $126,074.26. The engineer has recommended $14,008.25 be retained from the payment to Valley Paving. 7. County Road F Pay Estimate #2 . The Council is asked to approve pay estimate number two (2) in -. the amount of$155,136.13. The engineer has indicated that the payment be made with a suggested retainage of $33,904.0 1. 8. Perry Park Pay Estimate #1 . The Council is asked to approve pay estimate number one (1) in the amount of$100,376.10. The engineer has recommended . $11,152.92 be retained from the payment to Veit & Company. 9. Army Reserve MOA . The Council is asked to approve the Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with the Army Reserve. The Agreement is the first step in addressing the Army Reserve's request for retrocession. . 10_ Cities Week Proclamation .. The Council is asked to proclaim October 1-7,1995, as City's . Week. Staff would suggest that letters of appreciation be provided to all Committee volunteers and a barbeque be held at City Hall on October 3,1995, to thank all the participants. . 11. TCAAP Update Staff will briefly review publicly some of the discussions held at . the September 21,1995, Worksession. . -. . I . 1- 2. Non-Agenda Items The Council may be interested in the following non-agenda items: I a. September 15. 1995. Letter from James Solem. Metropolitan Council This letter serves as an update on the potential work stoppage by the bus drivers. I Also, included is an agenda for a Met Council Community Forum. City Staffwill be attending this Forum. I b. A Taste of Poland Shoreview has invited the City Council to the Taste of Poland to be held on October 26, 1995. I c. Various Newspaper Clippings I d. October 7.1995. Fall Clean Up Day Brochure e. September 9.1995. Vento Reutilization Committee Meetinl!: Minutes I f. Draft Resolution prepared byCity Staff for the Vento Reutilization Committee on the Conceptual Development Framework for the Long Range I Use of TCAAP I- I I I I I ., I I I. I . . ., .. MINUTES . CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING . SEPTEMBER 11, 1995 7:30 P.M. - NEW BRIGHTON CITY HALL . CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL . Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Dennis Probst called to order the regular City Council meeting at 7:30 p.m. . Present: Mayor Dennis Probst; Councilmembers Beverly Aplikowski, Dale Hicks, Paul Malone and Susan Keirn. . Also present were: City Accountant, Terry Post; Public Works Superintendent, Dwayne Stafford; Community Development Director, Kevin Ringwald; City Consulting Engineers, . Greg Stonehouse and Terry Maurer; City Attorney Jerry Filla; and Recording Secretary, Ruth McLaurin. .- ADOPT AGENDA MOTION: Hicks moved and Aplikowski seconded a motion to adopt the agenda for the . September 11, 1995 City Council meeting as presented. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). . APPROVAL OF COUNCIL MINUTES . August 28, 1995 Corrections: Page 7, paragraph five: to expand, add; . which is a step increase of3%. the effective . cost increase of1;JUrchased water for 1996 will be 2.4% Page 7, paragraph seven: "...Ramsey County Sheriff's Office_." should be corrected . to "...Ryder Student Transportation Services....". .'. MOTION: Keirn moved and Aplikowski seconded a motion to approve the minutes of the . August 28, 1995 regular City Council meeting as presented. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). . CONSENT CALENDAR .e A. Resolution 95-63, Truth in Taxation Public Hearing Dates. B. ClaimslPayroll. . - ------- . .. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - SEPTEMBER 11. 1995 2 . MOTION: Malone moved and Hicks seconded a motion to approve the Consent Calendar as . presented, and authorize execution of all necessary documents contained therein. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). . PUBLIC COMMENTS . Ms. Doris Canniff, 3946 Glenview, expressed concern about City spending, she felt the City was spending money unwisely. Ms. Canniff suggested any expenditure over $5,000 should be voted upon by the residents. . Ms. Canniff indicated it was aggravating to the citizens to see spending on such items as park improvements. . Mayor Probst extended an invitation for further public comment, hearing none, he moved on to the next item of business. . UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS .- O~ren EA W . Community Development Director Ringwald briefly reviewed the staff report in regard to the Environmental Assessment Worksheet ordered by the City Council for the Ogren development. . Mr. Ringwald indicated the 30 day public comment period for the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EA W) closed on August 30, 1995. Therefore the City Council is being requested to either; decide on the need for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), or postpone a decision for . up to 30 days to gather information which is critical to the decision on the need for an EIS. Mr. Ringwald explained the EA W is a brief document prepared in a worksheet format which is . designed to rapidly assess the environmental effects which may be associated with a proposed project. The criteria for determining significant environmental effect are found in Minnesota Rule Chapter 4410.1700, Subll\lfl7, which states: "In deciding whether a project has the potential for . significant environmental effects, the following factors shall be considered: A. Type, extent and reversibility of environmental effects; . B. Cumulative potential effects ofrelated or anticipated future projects; C. The extent to which the environmental effects are subject to mitigation by ongoing . public regulatory authority; and D. The extent to which the environmental effects can be anticipated and controlled as . a result of other environmental studies undertaken by public agencies or the project . proposer, or of EIS's previously prepared on similar projects. . ----.- I ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - SEPTEMBER 11. 1995 , .1 J I Mr. Ringwald noted the City is required, within five days of making its decision on the adequacy of the EA W, to notifY all persons on the EA W distribution list, all persons who provided written I comments during the 30 day public comment period, and to any other person upon written request. Mr. Ringwald indicated staff concludes that the development proposal, as modified by its I recommendations is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and City Code. Mr. Ringwald indicated staff concludes, and the developer has agreed to the following: a) that the I development proposal should comply with the intent of the City Shoreland Management and Floodplain regulations, even though the development project is not located in the shoreland area or I in a floodplain; b) to comply with certain tree and vegetation preservation measures, even though the City has no tree protection ordinance; c) to provide a buffer adjacent to the wetlands which will be protected by a conservation easement; d) to receive approval of and comply with the required I permits from the Rice Creek Watershed District, Department of Natural Resources and Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. He noted the development proposal has received the necessary nationwide permit from the US Army Corps of Engineers. I Mr. Ringwald pointed out the project in this development proposal is a one-time effect. In general, the construction of residential units is considered to be a non-reversible effect. Given that, the rules -I and regulations which govern residential construction are geared towards prevention and mitigation of those effects during the design and approval process, rather than reversing them through time. Mr. Ringwald noted there are currently no anticipated future development projects which are I associated to this development proposal. The previously described prevention and mitigation, measures have been established to minimize the long term or cumulative effects of this 16 unit I residential project. Mr. Ringwald reported the ongoing public regulatory authority over the project is limited to those I agencies who the developer is required to receive approval from prior to commencement of the project. The approval of and compliance with the permit requirements of these agencies will be a I condition of the Planned Unit Development. Mr. Ringwald explained t~,~ 16 unit residential project in this development proposal is subject to a I myriad of ongoing public regulations which have been designed to mitigate the environmental effects of these types of projects. He noted the proposed conditions of approval for this PUD, as recommended by staff and agreed to by the developer, would prohibit future modification to this I development proposal without further public input and City Council approval. Mr. Ringwald reported the rules and regulations which apply to this development are based on well I established practices by the reviewing agencies to prevent and mitigate the anticipated effects of the ~ development activity. . I I I I. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - SEPTEMBER 11. 1995 4 I Mr. Ringwald believed the EA W, public comments on the EA W, and responses to those public I comments have adequately identified the environmental effects which may be reasonably expected to occur from this 16 unit residential project. The identification of and mitigation procedures for these environmental effects will provide the City Council sufficient information to make an informed I decision on this development proposal. Mr. Ringwald indicated the staff would recommend in the Environmental Assessment Worksheet I for the T ownhomes of Lake Valentine that: I. The City Council adopt the response to the public comments; I 2. The City Council adopt the Findings of Fact; " The City Council adopt a negative declaration on the need for an EIS; ~. 4. The City Council authorize staff to distribute the responses to the public comments; I and 5. The City Council authorize staff to distribute the decision of the City Council on the need for an EIS. I Mayor Probst indicated this is not a Public Hearing, but the Council will allow public comment at I- this time. He noted comments would be limited to three minutes, to allow the opportunity for all who wish to speak. I Mr. Paul Rem, 1670 Glenview Court, presented the Council with information regarding drainage and flooding on the site. He wanted the Council to be informed ofthe lake levels, he did not believe the EA W addressed this issue. I Mr. Rem noted in 11 out of the last 20 years the lake level has been higher than 879.3 feet. And also, three of the past 20 years the lake was at or above 880.6 feet. I Mr. Rem expressed concern that these facts were not addressed by agencies commenting on the EA W because the plan included in the EA W was not the current version dated July 17, 1995. I Further he indicated that the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) had reservations about the sediment basin as shown in the earlier version of the plan, the only one upon which they could base their comments. .. I Mr. Mark Chapin, 3947 Rolling Hills Road, expressed disappointment with the EA W. He felt I the information provided in the EA W was not much more than what was previously known. He believed the EA W to be inadequate and urged the Council to postpone their decision until more detailed information could be provided. I Mr. Chapin indicated the EA W did not address any of the concerns regarding wildlife. He noted the . addition of impervious surface at the nearby elementary school was also not addressed. I I ---- -- I ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - SEPTEMBER 11. 1995 5 .1 I lYfr. Chapin felt the traffic study was inadequate. He noted the study compared the traffic from this development to 18 single family homes. He believed this was inappropriate because there is no I indication that 18 Single Family homes could be built on this site. He also noted the information was based on information from 1993, which is outdated. Mr. Chapin noted the comment period was until August 31, 1995 and urged the Council to postpone I their decision until September 25, 1995 to obtain additional information. Mr. Jay Schrankler, 1748 Venus Avenue, noted the EA W was completed prior to the remodeling I of Valentine Hills Elementary School. He felt this addition of impervious surface and additional I drainage issues should be addressed. Mr. Shrankler indicated if the Shoreland Management requirements are being upheld, the clear I cutting of trees would be prohibited, He noted in this proposed development there would be three acres of clear cutting. Mr. Shrankler also urged the City Council to take additional time for gathering information. I Mr. Craig Wilson, 1677 County Road F West, expressed concern for EA W, he believed the -I answers were too brief to the questions proposed by commentators. He noted many residents spent many hours preparing and researching, to comment in an intelligent way, asking pertinent questions only to receive curt answers. I Mr. Wilson expressed concern for drainage with the addition of hard surfaces, not only from the, development, but also from new surrounding construction such as; the Valentine Hills Elementary I School, County Road F, and construction at Bethel College. Mr. Wilson did not feel a comprehensive review of the area had been done in the EA W. He I expressed concern that future residents coming to the City would not receive relief when their property is flooded. I Ms. Fran Holmes, 1804 Venus Avenue, presented the Council with a memo and information. She noted residents spent quit<;,a bit of time speaking in regard to the Planned Unit Development at the I Planning Commission meeting and she felt comments were ignored by the Commission. She encouraged the Council to send the PUD back to the Planning Commission for further review. Ms. Holmes indicated she believed the development should not only be suggested to follow I shoreland regulations, but be included in the Shoreland Map, She noted in the Shoreland Management Regulations, "clear cutting trees" is prohibited, yet in this development over 60% of I trees will be removed. - . I I I . I. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - SEPTEMBER 11. 1995 6 I Ms. Holmes expressed concern regarding net density, the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning and Easement in her memo to the Council. I Ms. Doris Canniff, 3946 Glenview, expressed concern regarding that by building on the site those buyers who purchase homes may have problems. She was afraid the City would have to cover the . cost, if the development is not successful. Ms. Canniff indicated the residents wish for the area to stay the same. She feels the site is not . appropriate for building, but is more of a swamp like or wetland area. . Mr. Roger Aiken, 4360 Hamline, felt the EA W was inadequate and an EIS was necessary. Mr. Aiken felt pertinent information was not addressed in the EA W, such as; wildlife concerns, . traffic, future impact, etc. He did not believe some questions were resolved, such as control of the private road, pipe/culvert responsibilities, etc. . Mr. Aiken felt in the Staffs report, they mentioned upholding the Shoreland Requirements, but he believed the minimum lot size of20,OOO square feet and 30% density should also be upheld. .. Mr. Aiken felt the watershed area had been changed, which has not been reviewed. Mr. Aiken urged the Council to delay their decision. . Ms. Sharon Turgeon, 1777 Venus Avenue, indicated she had previously addressed the PlanninK Commission regarding this issue. She felt there should be an archaeological study of the site. She . noted the Minnesota Historical Society recommended that a site survey be taken. She believes this site has good potential for unreported properties because it is near a lake and settlements are known I to be on hilltops. Ms. Turgeon noted this survey would not be drastic and the cost most likely under $2,000. She felt I this issue should be addressed before the hilltop is removed. Mr. Joe Vodonik, 1723 9Jenview, expressed concern for the lake levels and t1ooding. He inquired I who would take the responsibility should the site flood after development. Hilda Reynold, 1645 Glenview Court, indicated the site t100ded twice last year. She noted more I trees will be removed and there will be less to absorb the water. Ms. Billie Schacht, 1683 West County Road F, inquired if the property is owned by Mr. Ogren or I is the ownership still pending. She also asked if the Council was listening to the comments and concerns of the residents. I . I - - . ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - SEPTEMBER II. 1995 7 .. Mayor Probst indicated it is the Council's understanding that Mr. Ogren has control of the property. . Mayor Probst indicated the question before the Council is the adequacy of the EA W. . Councilmember Hicks asked about the information provided by Mr. Rem, he inquired as to the I significance of 1957 water levels. Mr. Rem indicated this was selected as a typical year. Councilmember Hicks noted the information denoted the levels increasing by .3 inches each year . in the last 40 years, where would the expected changes be for the next 40 years. Mr. Ringwald noted there has been a substantial amount of development over the last 40 years and until the 1980s there were no regulations regarding nm off and drainage, he felt this was one of the major factors for the I increase in lake levels. He noted now the area is at its highest level of development. Councilmember Hicks inquired as to the effect of the Valentine Elementary School. Mr. Ringwald . noted the impact is not significant since the run off will flow to the west into Valentine Creek and not into Valentine Lake. Councilmember Hicks inquired why the drainage would be to Valentine Lake and not to Valentine . Creek from the proposed development. Mr. Ringwald noted the project could provide for a two cell -. approach with the sediment basin. The ponding would provide water to a historical wetland that is currently not a jurisdictional wetland. Also in providing a connection into Valentine Lake with the piping, through the PUD the City could enforce Shoreland Management requirements. . Mayor Probst asked in regard to the traffic analysis, what impact the traffic would have on the road.. Mr. Ringwald indicated in general, the entrance to the development is a safe distance from Old . Highway 10 and 490 feet from the entrance to Valentine Hills Elementary, therefore there would be no concern regarding access. In regard to increase in traffic flow, the road was designed as an minor arterial and could support the additional traffic. He noted the additional traffic will not be I significant. Mayor Probst inquired as to the "clear cutting" of a stand of trees. Mr. Ringwald agreed with the I definition given by Ms. Holmes for a stand of trees, but indicated in his assessment the cluster of trees he was referring to will still be within the development_ The area to be cleared would be ~ I' mostly brush and not defined as a stand of trees. . Mayor Probst asked if a survey of the vegetation was available. Mr. Ringwald noted there is one, but he did not have it available at the Meeting. I Mayor Probst inquired if there is a body of evidence to support an archaeological survey. Mr. Ringwald indicated he did not feel the Minnesota Historical Society provided enough information . - to warrant a survey, and also noted there are mechanisms available should any remains be found . during construction. He noted it is a felony to continue work if any remains are found: I I I I. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - SEPTEMBER II. 1995 8 I Mayor Probst noted there are three options available to the Council; 1) the item could be deferred to a later date, 2) Council could establish the need for an EIS, and 3) the Council could establish no I need for the EIS and if so publish the responses to the comments made during public comment of the EA W. I Councilmember Aplikowski wished to assure the residents that the Council is listening to the concerns of the citizens, and indicated many hours of reading, meeting and reviewing the issues I goes into the Council's decisions. She noted, even though it may at times be difficult for the residents to listen to the Council's actions, they are acting on behalf of the community as a whole. I Councilmember Keirn indicated there are three issues to address; first, the archeological survey, which she believes is not warranted due to lack of evidence, if there were to be a settlement it would have been on the hilltop to the north of the site, which sits slightly higher than the knoll on I this site; secondly, there is not an estimated significant increase in traffic from the development; thirdly, the issue of drainage which is still a difficult one, but she indicated many questions can be answered without the EIS. I Councilmember Keirn inquired if it was Mr. Ringwald's opinion that the increase of lake level was I- mostly due to the significant development between the 1950s and I 970s. Mr. Ringwald felt that was a fair statement, the requirements for drainage have changed since the 1970s. I Councilmember Malone indicated he has read reports, and listened to comments, and the issue has been a difficult one. He believed the EA W answers all the questions the Council had. He did not see a reason to proceed with an EIS. I Councilmember Aplikowski agreed, and felt any additional questions could be answered without an additional study. I Councilmember Hicks concurred with Councilmembers Aplikowski and Malone. I Mayor Probst inquired if one motion could contain all five requests of staff. City Attorney Filla indicated item number one should contain identification of the memo ofRLK Associates Ltd. I MOTION: Keirn mov~d, and Aplikowski seconded a motion to adopt the responses to the public comments in the report ofRLK Associates, Ltd; adopt the Findings of Fact; adopt a negative declaration on the need for an EIS; authorize staff to distribute the I responses to the public comments; and authorize staff to distribute the decision of the City Council on the need for an EIS. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). I Mayor Probst noted this issue has been a difficult one, but felt questions had been answered in the . EA Wand an EIS would not address any additional questions. I I I ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - SEPTEMBER II. 1995 9 .1 City Attorney Filla indicated all information presented to the Council be included in the minutes, I those items would be: I Environmental Assessment Worksheet pages 1-17; Figures 1-10; Attachments 1-4; Casey comments dated July 10,1995; I Army comments to Ogren dated August 2, 1995; Army comments Grimmestad dated August 2, 1995; Met Council comments dated August 3, 1995; I Historical Society comments dated August 14, 1995; Aiken comments August 23, 1995 and attachments; Turgeon comments dated August 30, 1995; I Lyons comments dated August 30, 1995; DNR comments August 25, 1995; I Lois Rem comments dated August 30, 1995; Paul Rem comments dated August 30, 1995; Holmes comment dated August 30, 1995; I Bergly memo dated July 5, 1995; MSA comments dated June 29,1995; Chapin comments dated August 28, 1995; -I Chapin comments dated August 30,1995; Staff memo dated September 11,1995; RLK responses dated September 6, 1995; I Handouts presented at Council meeting September 11,1995: Turgeon memo dated September 6,1995 and September 11,1995; Holmes comments dated September II, 1995; I Paul Rem comments dated September 11, 1995. Mayor Probst reiterated that this action was in regard to the EA W only and the Planned Unit I Development CPUD) will be addressed at the October 10, 1995 meeting and will require a 4/5 vote of the Council for approval. I Mayor Probst also noted the residents have the right to appeal any action of the City Council to the District Court. I <0/,' County Road F Stop Sign Consulting Engineer Terry Maurer briefly reviewed the request for a three way stop sign at the I intersection of County Road F and Fairview Avenue. Mr. Maurer analyzed the warrants or justifications for installing a multi-way stop sign at this I - location. He would recommend against installation if slowing the average speed on County Road . F is the only reason for considering a stop sign at this location. However, if additional reasons, such I I . .. AEDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - SEPTEMBER 11. 1995 10 . as pedestrian movements crossing County Road F or vehicular traffic trying to enter County Road . F from Fairview Avenue are present, then the installation could be valid. Mr. Maurer recommended not installing the stop sign. . Councilmember Aplikowski indicated she agreed with the engineer, but in talking with residents, they have a difficult time entering County Road F from their drives. She noted if this is the reason, . the sign should be located on Valentine Avenue. Councilmember Malone agreed with the engineer's report and indicated he did not feel the sign is . necessary . Councilmember Aplikowski inquired if the Sheriff's Department had an opportunity to monitor the . speeding problems. Mr. Post indicated he had noticed a patrol presence on County Road F and that the Sheriff's Smart Unit is scheduled to monitor traffic speed on the road later this month. . Mayor Probst indicated there is a problem, and if a stop sign helps address this problem, he feels it would be appropriate. He noted there is significant pedestrian traffic across County Road F that .. would also benefit from the sign. He noted this is an inexpensive, simple way to address the problem. I Ms. Ann-Marie Hoelscher, 1750 Gramsie Road, indicated she felt the number one reason she would request a sign is to enable her to leave her driveway in the morning. . Ms. Billie Schacht, 1683 W. County Road F, indicated her and her husband observed 305 cars, and 20 buses between 7:00 a.m. and 7:30 a.m. They also noted traffic backed up from Highway 10 to Crystal A venue. . Mr. John Steinglen, 1785 County Road F West, noted if it is a matter of money he would pay. He noted it is his opinion that a sign is necessary and he hopes it does not take loss of human life to I convince the Council to do something. I Mr. Ken Schacht, 1683 West County Road F, indicated the traffic needs to be controlled. Mr. Craig Wilson, 1677 West County Road F, indicated it was his understanding the stop sign was . a suggestion of the Sheriffs Department. He felt this suggestion should be followed. MOTION: Hicks moved, Probst seconded a motion to approve the installation of three-way stop . sign at the intersection of County Road F and Fairview A venue. The motion carried (3-2, with Councilmembers Malone and Aplikowski in opposition.) I . . -- I ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - SEPTEMBER II. 1995 II .1 I Cauncilmember Aplikawski nated her abjection was anly to. the lacatian, nat the installation af a stap sign. I An unidentified resident indicated it is impartant far the City Cauncil to remember that speeding is a very important issue near the park. He urged the City to. get the assistance of the Sheriff's I Department to control the problem. Mayar Probst nated the Staff has contacted the Sheriffs Department. I Ms. Billie Schacht, 1683 West County Road F, indicated the Sheriffs Department had two. cars I drive through at 8 :30 a.m., but by that time the majarity af the traffic had already gone. Public Works Ventilation System I City Accauntant Past indicated due to. the increased safety awareness, it has been painted out by several people, including Dan Zehm, a farmer State OSHA Compliance Officer, that the I Maintenance Building is in need of a ventilation/make up air system. Public Warks Superintendent Stafford indicated the City salicited bids far a complete jab, which -I wauld meet all cades and OSHA standards. The jab wauld include all plumbing, electrical work, duct work, and carpentry. Mr. Staffard indicated of the faur mechanical contractars cantacted, three came out and did a I complete inspectian af our maintenance building. All three returned bids ranging from $12,080 to. $23,190. I Mr. Staffard indicated Staff recammends the Council apprave the bid fram Apalla Heating and I Ventilating Carparatian in the amaunt af $18,400.00 for a new make up air system for the Public Warks Maintenance Building. MOTION: Hicks maved, and Malone seconded a matian to. accept bids and award bid to. Apallo I Heating and Ventilatian Carparatian in the amaunt nat to. exceed $18,400.00 far a new make l,lp air system far the Public Warks Maintenance Building. The matian I carried unanimausly (5-0). Mayar Prabst indicated he realized the expenditure was large, but noted the City had no chaice, I safety carnes first. Public Works Pickup Purchase I - City Accauntant Post nated the pickup had been budgeted, but this purchase wauld be abave what . was budgeted. I I I I. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - SEPTEMBER 11. 1995 12 I Public Works Superintendent Stafford indicated the purchase would allow for a snow plow which I will help in small areas of the City to be plowed, such as alley ways and cul-de-sacs. Mr. Stafford noted Staff would recommend approval of acquisition of the 1995 Ford 3/4 Ton 4x4 I with plow package from Superior Ford at a total cost of $21 ,894.73. MOTION: Malone moved, and Aplikowski seconded a motion to authorize the acquisition of I the 1995 Ford 3/4 Ton 4x4 with plow package from Superior Ford with a cost not to exceed $21,894.73. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). I Midwest Asphalt Pay Estimate Number Two (2). Consulting Engineer Maurer recommended retaining additional money to assure proper action by I the contractor in regard to insurance matters that are, as of yet, unresolved. Mr. Maurer noted based upon conversations with the contractor on Wednesday, September 6, 1995, I it appears that the three flooded basement claims were to be paid by the contractor's insurance; however, it is unclear as to whether or not all checks have been written or sent. Until the City is I- assured that these and the other two property claims are addressed, it is important to retain this extra amount. I Mr. Maurer further recommended tabling action until the next Meeting to draw additional attention to the unsolved issues. I MOTION: Aplikowski moved to withhold payment until a later date, the motion failed for lack of a second. I Councilmember Keirn noted that Midwest Asphalt is the contractor who did the 1994 parking lot work at Valentine Park and indicated no heavy vehicles should be used on the pavement, yet they were the ones to park all of their heavy equipment on the pavement during the County Road F I reconstruction. I Mr. Craig Wilson, 167'(..County Road F West, noted for the Council that a metal cover was placed over one of the manholes, but was not covering the manhole completely. Mr. Maurer indicated it is not uncommon to use metal covers, but it is not appropriate to use the cover for an I extended amount of time. He noted he will contact the contractor in regard to this issue. TCAAP I Community Development Director Ringwald indicated at the September 9, 1995 meeting of the . Reutilization Committee, Arden Hills presented their plan for the Arsenal property. I I . ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - SEPTEMBER I 1. 1995 13 .. I Mr. Ringwald noted although the plan was not directly endorsed, he felt the presentation went well. He indicated the Task Force hopes to present a resolution that will be endorsed at the next meeting I of the Reutilization Committee. Mayor Probst commended Mr. Ringwald for his presentation at the Reutilization Committee meeting . and noted eight of the ten Task Force members were present. Mayor Probst indicated two plans have been presented, the one from Arden Hills and a plan from I the Friends of TCr\AP, he felt the plans were very similar. He noted he hopes the Reutilization will choose a conceptual plan without specifically identifying land use. . Mayor Probst indicated the last two meetings of the Reutilization Committee will be held on September 14th and 23rd. I ADMINISTRATOR COMMENTS City Accountant Post presented the administrator comments due to the absence of Mr. Fritsinger. . Mr. Post indicated at the December 28, 1994 Council Meeting, Council authorized Staff to proceed -. with at $13,856.82 unbudgeted capital item in the Water Fund, this item consisted of the first phase of a two phase project. The first phase consisted of replacing the control panels at the booster Station and Femwood (north) water tower. I Mr. Post noted Staff indicated that the second phase of the project, including replacement pumps, I motors and the control panel at the Red Fox (south) water tower would be evaluated in 1995. Public Works Superintendent, Stafford indicated after working with the Roseville Water Department I Engineer they have provide the City with information on how to save money using the updated controls and will now be able to fill the south tower for the first time since it was built. Mr. Post indicated it is recommended that the Council authorize Connelly Electronics to go ahead I with the Telemetry portion of Phase II at the price of about $4,400.00 and eliminate plans for replacing motors, saving <lPproximately $19,000.00 from planned Phase II. I MOTION: Malone moved, and Hicks seconded a motion to authorize Connelly Electronics to proceed with The Telemetry portion of Phase II at a price not to exceed $4,400.00. . The motion carried unanimously (5-0). COUNCIL COMMENTS I ~ Councilmember Malone indicated the trail near the City Hall was not opposed by the nearby . I townhome development, but rather they could not afford the expense. . I .. . . I. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - SEPTEMBER II. 1995 14 I Councilmember Aplikowski wished to thank Mr. Jon Hoelscher for the publication of the Town Crier. I Councilmember Aplikowski inquired if purchasing water from the Arsenal had been investigated_ I Mayor Probst indicated Staff could further research this, at one time they spoke of giving the water to the City. I Councilmember Malone indicated it had been spoken of previously, but because the supply is not permanent, the water of a lesser softened quality and the offer was for 2 million gallons, the option was passed at that time. I Mayor Probst indicated this item could be added to a Worksession agenda. I Councilmember Keirn indicated she would not be able to attend the September 21, 1995 Worksession. I Mayor Probst noted another committee chair opening and urged Councilmembers to suggest appointments. Ie Councilmember Hicks mentioned the change of the first October regular Council meeting due to Columbus Day. I MOTION: Hicks moved and Malone seconded a motion to authorize the change of the October 9, 1995 meeting to Tuesday October 10,1995 at 7:30 p.m. with the location to be. I announced. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). ADJOURN I MOTION: Malone moved and Keirn seconded a motion to adjourn the meeting at 10:00 p.m. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). I I 'Or' I Dennis Probst Brian Fritsinger I Mayor City Administrator I . I --- ._~ .. , . ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - SEPTEMBER II. 1995 15 .. . NOTICE OF MEETINGS . The next regular Council meeting will be held September 25, 1995, at 7:30 p.m., at New Brighton City Hall. . . . I I -. . . . . . . . ~ . . . I I. e') J h jOQ~ '"' '-~ " ~)"JJ .. I -..,',..", :'-',' I Mayor Probst, I My name is Brad Ernst and I would like to volUl'lteer to fill the current opening on the Public Safety/Pub1ic Works Committee in Arden Hills. My I cousin, Arnie Delger, may have mentioned my name to you already. I have been an Arden Hills resident since 1988 and am very interested in I participating in this city function. I do not have any detailed agenda of things to accomplish as part of the committee, but am interested in learnmg more I about the politics of the city and how things get done. Hopefully, as I learn more, I can make some meaningful contributions. I - I graduated from the U. ofM. in 1980 with a degree in Mechanical Engineering and have worked for 3M Company the past 11 years. Prior to I- that I worked for Minco Products in Fridley_ My interests are athletics (especially golf) and reading. I I'm looking forward to the possibility of serving on the committee, and I want I to thank you for considering me. - I SIZIY~ ,,~O- g}----, I Brad Ernst I . r I I I- I I ~ I. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS MEMORANDUM . DATE: September 25, 1995 I TO: Mayor and City Council I FROM: Kevin Ringwald, Community Development Director V SUBJECT: Planning Cases 95-06 and 95-21 I The following is a brief review of the requests and the recommendations ofthe Planning I Commission. Case 95-06. Holiday Inn. 1201 West County Road E. Landscape Plan I 1. Request The applicant is requesting approval ofa landscape plan for the Holiday Inn at 1201 West I County Road E. rI' 2. Background The applicant originally appeared before the Planning Commission on March 1,1995. At that meeting the Planning Commission recommended approval of exterior alterations to I the building. The proposed alterations to the buildings exterior were principally cosmetic in nature. Therefore, the enhancements to the landscaping are not a requirement of the City Code, but yet require City approval. - I 3. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission recommends approval of Planning Case 95-06, Landscape I Plan for the Holiday Inn, as submitted. Case 95-21. Sharon Laumeyer. 3540 New Bri~hton Road. SUP-Home Occunation I 1. Request The applicant is reql.resting approval of a Special Accessory Use Permit for a home I occupation to opef<tte an antique store in the R-2 zoning district. 2. Background I a. The antique shop will be open only upon request or no more than a couple of times per month_ The hours of operation will be limited to weekends during the I summer months. The property is isolated from visual view of all neighboring residential properties. The nearest residential property is at least 350 feet from Ie this property and no other residential property shares the roadway (Hudson Avenue) with the applicant. I I . 1- b. The operation will exist entirely within an existing accessory structure. No special entrances are required. No exterior evidence of the home occupation will be visible to the public, except for a small sign as permitted by City Code. I c. The business will be operated by Ms. Laumeyer who has lived at this location for I 30 years. No one other than Ms. Laumeyer will be employed by the home occupation. I d. All customer visits will be by appointment only and limited to 1-2 individuals at a time. All parking will be accommodated off-street. The driveway can accommodate 6-8 vehicles. There will be no deliveries. I 3. Planning Commission Recommendation I The Planning Commission recommends approval of Planning Case 95-21, Special Use Permit-Home Occupation for Sharon Laumeyer, conditioned on: I a. The occupation must comply with all of the Zoning requirements as outlined in Section VI, B, 3, a and c, of the Arden Hills Zoning Ordinance; I b. All signage must comply with the requirements of the sign ordinance and its location be limited to the property in question; ", c. The property may not be sold as a commercial/retail property; and d. Special Use Permit expires with the sale or transfer ofthe property, new occupant I may reapply for the special use permit. - I I I I .' I I Ie I ------ . . :. ~.~. .J CITY OF ARDEN HILLS . MEMORANDUM . DATE: September 25, 1995 . TO: Mayor and City Council . FROM: Kevin Ringwald, Community Development Director V SUBJECT: Planning Cases 95-06 and 95-21 . The following is a brief review of the requests and the recommendations of the Planning . Commission. Case 95-06. Holiday Inn. 1201 West County Road E. Landscalle Plan . 1. Request The applicant is requesting approval of a landscape plan for the Holiday Inn at 1201 West . County Road E. ", 2. Background The applicant originally appeared before the Planning Commission on March 1, 1995. At that meeting the Planning Commission recommended approval of exterior alterations to . the building. The proposed alterations to the buildings exterior were principally cosmetic in nature. Therefore, the enhancements to the landscaping are not a requirement of the City Code, but yet require City approval. - . 3. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission recommends approval of Planning Case 95-06, Landscape . Plan for the Holiday Inn, as submitted. Case 95-21. Sharon Laumever. 3540 New Bri!!hton Road. SUP-Home OCCullation . 1. Request The applicant is requesting approval of a Special Accessory Use Permit for a home . occupation to opeF<fte an antique store in the R-2 zoning district. 2. Back!!round . a. The antique shop will be open only upon request or no more than a couple of times per month. The hours of operation will be limited to weekends during the . summer months. The property is isolated from visual view of all neighboring residential properties. The nearest residential property is at least 350 feet from .e this property and no other residential property shares the roadway (Hudson Avenue) with the applicant. . I I :."' ,.;' b. The operation will exist entirely within an existing accessory structure. No . special entrances are required. No exterior evidence of the home occupation will be visible to the public, except for a small sign as permitted by City Code. I c. The business will be operated by Ms. Laumeyer who has lived at this location for I 30 years. No one other than Ms. Laumeyer will be employed by the home occupation. I d. All customer visits will be by appointment only and limited to 1-2 individuals at a time. All parking will be accommodated off-street. The driveway can accommodate 6-8 vehicles. There will be no deliveries. I 3. Planninl:" Commission Recommendation I The Planning Commission recommends approval of Planning Case 95-21, Special Use Permit-Home Occupation for Sharon Laumeyer, conditioned on: I a. The occupation must comply with all of the Zoning requirements as outlined in Section VI, B, 3, a and c, of the Arden Hills Zoning Ordinance; I b. All signage must comply with the requirements ofthe sign ordinance and its location be limited to the property in question; ", c. The property may not be sold as a commercial/retail property; and d. Special Use Permit expires with the sale or transfer of the property, new occupant I may reapply for the special use permit. - I I I I ' r I I Ie I I .- . I. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS MEMORANDUM I I DATE: September 21, 1995 I TO: Mayor and City Council Brian Fritsinger, Administrat@ FROM: I SUBJECT: Betbel College SWM Appeal I Back~round I During 1994, the City received an Appeal for the Surface Water Management (SWM) fees assessed to Bethel College. The City Council reviewed this Appeal several times in late 1994 and 1995. I This Appeal was based on a number of primary concerns, and are outlined below: .- 1. Street and Highway right-of-way exemptions from SWM utility fees. 2. Lake Surface (Valentine) exemptions from SWM fees. , Land Use Designation (SUP). J_ . 4. Amount of water retained within the Bethel College property. I According to SWM Utility Ordinance Item I,B,2Iakes designated as natural environmental (which Valentine Lake is) shall be exempt from all SWM fees. Therefore, the area of Bethel College property within Lake Valentine should no longer be assessed the SWM fee. I As directed by Council at the November 28, and December 28, 1994, Council Meetings, Staff reduced the SWM fees to reflect the acreage associated with Valentine Lake. This I action was relevant only to the fourth quarter 1994 utility billing. This action did not make the Appeal retroactive to the date of Appeal (April I, 1994). I The right of way and water retainage arguments were found not to be appropriate in this case. However, there was discussion about the impact of the zoning and land use or property classification .in this Appeal. City Staff met with the City Attorney and City Engineer to . review this argument and a legal opinion was obtained supporting this Appeal. . .- I "' I , 2 .1 Those issues which related to the Ordinance itself and were the justification for the I supporting of the appeal are: 1. Policv Statement I Except as herein after provided, all properties within the City of Arden Hills shall contribute to the Surface Water Management Utility in an amount proportional to the runoff contributed by each particular I parce 1. 2. Computation of Surface Water Management Fees - subpara.l - I LandUse Land use for determining Surface Water Management fees shall be the existing land use at the date of enactment of the Surface Water I Management Ordinance. As land is developed, or redeveloped, the fees will be recomputed, based on the revised land use. , Adjustment of Fees - subpara. 2 I ~. Surface Water Management fees will be adjusted under the following I conditions: -Changes in Developed Conditions of Parcels In summary, Attorney Filla concurred that in this situation the existing Special Use Permit -I . does not allow Bethel to build to the typical B 1 zoning standards. The existing SUP limits site coverage of buildings, drives, parking, walks and other surfaced areas to twenty five . percent. This limitation is most common with residential development limits. This SliP is a document which can be amended by the City at anytime. Should Bethel pursue amendments to the SUP in the future the City should consider amending the applicable rate I in this case. Appeal Costs I 1. Valentine Lake - The original credit amount implemented for the fourth quarter of 1994 was $2,943.35 If additional credit is given for the second and third quarters the additional credit owed would be I $5,886.70. t.' . 2. Land Use - If the rate were to be reduced from $50.75 to $11.94 retroactive to January I, 1995, the overall credit would be $10,636.06. If approved by the Council, the City will credit future accounts rather than issuing a I reimbursement check in these amounts. . . -. I -----.--- . - .. " J Other Items . The Council should also note that the concept of a new category was discussed. As no new category was in place at the time of this Appeal, it did not appear appropriate to create a new . category; ie. Institutional. The Ordinance/Policy also allows appeals only on a case by case basis. I No 1995 Appeals were received by the City. . Recommendation The City Engineer has recommended granting the Appeal on the basis of lake area reduction retroactive to the 2nd Quarter of 1994 and usage being effective January I, 1995. I BF:sae . . I .- I . I I ,. I I I .- I AUG-18-95 FRI 7' : 1 6 MS'r ST PAUL ,,' P... 01 ._----_.~~~---- I Fad .- _..~-_. - MElvfORANDUM I To: Brian Fritsinger I CC File 520-000-00 From: Greg Stonehouse - Date: August 17, 1995 Subject: Bethel College SWM Appenl - '$rian, - This memorandum is forwarded to summarize our latest meeting with Mr, Craig Hjelle I 'orEethel College regarding the referenced issue. Based upon our meeting, it appears -" that Bethel College is in agreement with the recommendations presented in our letter -. dated March 16, 1995, attached, To the best of my knowledge, these findings were agreed upon by representatives of the City of Arden Hills, the City Attorney, MSA l! Consulting Engineers, and Eethel College, The recommendations were as follows: I I - Accept the appeal based upon the deletion of Lake Valentine effective the .-" second quaner of 1994, I "'I' 'II - Accept the appeal regarding usage effective January I, 1995 based upon .,: the date the appeal was actually submitted - .! I If there are questions regarding this issue, please contact Terry Maurer in my absence, !J ,." ,;Otherwise, I would be glad to assist you upon my return on September 5, 1995 I Fl\O\J THE DESK 0..... . I ~;~:;.(; S r'Jr-.:E!K)I;~e ,. ; i'ROIE,-"':' E~,-I.,jr.-:c:ER ~is:-\ (:::;<':;-It'LTC<,(; E;-.'Cl:-"EERS .,'Jj;;:6 g:-';~lJyP.\RKD~\'l: ~T.- f'.\r:1... .\Il''':~;E~TA 5$ lo~.S201 I (6121 6.j-1--4]~9 ,~'''''i\: (612iS.\+9H6 I I -. ,- 'I'. I . ./ - . -i8M March 16, 1995 . rOmLTIXG E.\GI\EEBS File: 520-000.00 I 1326 Energy PorI: Drive St. PoIJI. MN 55108 Mr. Brian Fritsinger I 612,6A4.J389 City of Arden Hills 1,800.888.2923 1450 West Highway 96 Fax: 612.64HdJ6 Arden Hills, MN 55112 . RE: BETHEL COLLEGE SWM APPEAL . Dear Mr. Fritsinger: . This letter is submitted as requested by the City of Arden Hills with regard to the referenced issue. After our meeting with City Staff, Mr. Craig Hjelle of Bethel College, I and Mr. James Unruh, we have come to some understanding of the basis of Bethel's request for appeal of its storm water management fee. OVll ENGINEERING: _'IRONMENTAl As you are aware, the property owner's initial appeal was based upon sevefal issues, I UNIQPAL ranging from the area being assessed to the amount of runoff contributed to the watershed ?l.ANNING from the property. It was determined by the Council at the November 28, 1994, Council saUD WASTE meeting that Bethel College should not be assessed a fee for the area within the limits of . SiRUC'JRAl Lake Valentine. It was also determined that the walkways within the propeny were not SURvEYING public right-of-way and, therefore, should be assessed for drainage contribution. . iRAfFIC ~NsroRTAnON The final issue that was discussed by Mr. Hjelle and his consultant engineer was the actual i:LEm.lCAV'MEGIANICAl intent of the ordinance with respect to development. As you are also aware, the propeny . ~l>.jGlNESING: currently exists under a Special Use Pennit which states that the property may not be .-IVAC developed beyond 25 % of its overall area. This percentage development would include the ~WER OIm.le,vnON area of all building footprints, driveways, parking areas, sport and athletic fields, etc. The . i[).DA typical B-1 zoned property would be allowed to develop up to 35 % of its propeny with SYSTEM. CONTROLS structures and up to 75 % total development, as outlined above. This yields a difference I between Bethel's SUP and the typical B-1 property of 50 % . Previous correspondence to this issue stated that Bethel's SUP could be amended at any time in the future to allow additional development up to that 75% limit, as stated in the City's Zoning Ordinance I manual. Bethel's contention with this issue is the actual policy statement of the ordinance. . A=rding to Bethel representatives, the inferred intent of that statement is that properties are assessed storm water utility fees based "on an amount proportional to the runoff .FFICE5iN; contributed by each particular parcel", not the zoning of the property. They support this I MINNEAPOUS argument with Ordinance Statement C.1, which states that "Land use for determining PRIOR lAKE surlace water management fees shall be the existing land use at the date of enactment of the I 5i. 'AUl W AlEc)' - ~ , . <' . Mr. Brian Fritsinger .. March 16, 1995 Page Two I Surface Water Management Ordinance', and E.2 which states that fees will be adjusted I under conditions such as . changes in developed conditions of parcels. . Based upon the clarification of Bethel's appeal and further meetings with City staff and the I City Attorney, we have evaluated the issue further. Mr. Jerry Filla, the Arden Hills City Attorney, was of the opinion that the appeal was valid, based upon the policy statement outlined above. Based upon legal opinion and the present Special Use Pennit which Bethel . College operates under, it is our recommendation that the appeal be granted based upon land use and current drainage contribution. It is estimated that the runoff contributed from Bethel College is comparable to that ofR-l type zoning, based on comparable impervious I development criteria. Bethel should, therefore, be assessed an SWM fee of $11.94 per acre. Based upon our discussions, we recommend granting the appeal on the basis of . development, effective January I, 1995. We also recommend granting the portion of the I appeal based upon the Lake Valentine area, effective second quarter 1994, as that is the date the appeal was presented. We hope this letter adequately addresses your requirements regarding this issue. Please-. contact our office if you have further questions or require additional infonnation. Sincerely, I MSA, CONSULTING ENGINEERS . /l ~~ ~~ WY\--- I i / Grego J tonehouse, P.E. GJS:tw . 000-1604.lllAr ,.' . I . . -. . ---.-----"~_._--_.---- ---. . . PosH\' Fax Note 7671 " -. 1- Phone .~ F... Fa" I --...--. MElvfORANDUM I I To: Brian Fritsinger CC File 520-000-00 I From: Greg Stonehouse Date: August 17, 1995 I Subject: Bethel College SWM Appelll ~ '- \ -':r.: I :$rian :.;,-: , I This memorandum is forwarded to summarize our latest meeting wirh Mr. Craig Hjelle '01' Eethel College regarding the referenced issue. Based upon our meeting, it appears I- '!L tbat Bethel College is in agreement with the recommendations presented in our letter 'I dated March 16, 1995, attached. To the best of my knowledge, these findings were agreed upon by representatives of the City of Arden Hills, the City Attorney, MSA :i ,Consulting Engineers, and Eethel College. The recommendations were as follows: I d' . '!il. ~ i ' - Accept the appeal based upon the deletion of Lake Valentine effective the I second quaner of 1994. ';!: ill _ Accept the appeal regarding usage effective January I, 1995 based upon '![ the date the appeal was actually submitted. I l! " I,; .,~fthere are questions regarding this issue, please contact Terry Maurer in my absence, I ,': ,.otherwise, I would be glad to assist you upon my return on September 5, 1995, , ,Ii- F~()" TIU:: DeSK OF... I ~~Rit~ Sf''>>';E!.JOI.i~E . ?ROJEeE;':<.,;f.':C!ER ~is;-\ Cc:-:~t'L.i'ING E:-<Gl'\:EE.RS '_1.JZ,6 bm~y PARK DRI\'E I *:P.1.lJL \f1':'-:}:EW!A,S$ IOl(.S20'1 l(]_12} 6-14-4389 fAX: (612)6.~9~46 I I- :'[1' -., ,1. " I --------------- -------~-------- ! I ,/ . I I i~IS~ _I 11 11 March 16, 1995 . rO\'RL'mC F.~G1~mIS File: 520-000.00 J 326 En"IJY Pori< Drive I St. Pcut, MN 55108 Mr. Brian Fritsinger 612,64.1.4389 City of Arden Hills I 1.8OIJ.888.2923 1450 West Highway 96 fox: 612'644'94A6 Arden Hills, MN 55112 I RE: BETHEL COllEGE SWM APPEAL Dear Mr. Fritsinger: I This letter is submitted as requested by the City of Arden Hills with regard to the I referenced issue. After our meeting with City Staff, Mr. Craig Hjelle of Bethel College, and Mr. James Unruh, we have come to some understanding of the basis of Bethel's I request for appeal of its storm water management fee. CMl ENGINEERING: ENVIRONMENTAL As you are aware, the property owner's initial appeal was based upon several issues, _I MUNICIPAL t4I1ging from the area being assessed to the amount of runoff contributed to the watershed MNNING from the property. It was determined by the Council at the November 28, 1994, Council SCUD WASTE meeting that Bethel College should not be assessed a fee for the area within the limits of . 5iRUCtJAAl Lake Valentine, It was also determined that the walkways within the property were not SURVEYING public right-of-way and, therefore, should be assessed for drainage contribution. ~Af?C I TtAN$PORT.A.TIQN The final issue that was discussed by Mr. Hjelle and his consultant engineer was the actual 2!..fCRlCAIIM€OIANICAl intent of the ordinance with respect to development. As you are also aware, the property I :NGlNEERING; currently exists under a Special Use Permit which states that the property may not be HV.ll.C developed beyond 25 % of its overall area. This percentage development would include the ~ERDISTRI8UTlON area of all building footptints, driveways, parking areas, sport and athletic fields, etc. The I SODA typical B-1 zoned property would be allowed to develop up to 35 % of its property with $Y'SieM CONTROlS structures and up to 75 % total development, as outlined above. This yields a difference between Bethel's SUP and the typical B-1 property of 50%. Pre~ousco~ndenceto . this issue stated that Bethel's SUP could be amended at any time in the future to allow additional development up to that 75 % limit, as stated in the City's Zoning Ordinance manual. I Bethel's contention with this issue is the actual policy statement of the ordinance. According to Bethel representatives, the inferred intent of that statement is that properties I are assessed storm water utility fees based "on an amount proportional to the runoff OfflCESIN: contributed by each particular parcel", not the zoning of the property. They support this. MINNEAPOUS argument with Ordinance Statement C.l, which states that "Land use for determining I PRIOR lAKE surface water management fees shall be the existing land use at the date of enactment of the Sj, PAUL I WASECA I . ., 1- Mr. Brian Fritsinger I March 16, 1995 Page Two I Surface Water Management Ordinance", and E.2 which states that fees will be adjusted under conditions such as "changes in developed conditions of pa:teels. " . Based upon the clarification of Bethel's appeal and further meetings with City staff and the City Attorney, we have evaluated the issue further. Mr. Jerry Filla, the Arden Hills City I Attorney, was of the opinion that the appeal was valid, based upon the policy statement outlined above, Based upon legal opinion and the present Special Use Pennit which Bethel College operates under, it is our recommendation that the appeal be granted based upon I land use and c=t drainage contribution. It is estimated that the runoff contributed from Bethel College is compazable to that of R -1 type zoning, based on comparable impervious development criteria. Bethel should, therefore, be assessed an SWM fee of $11.94 per I acre. Based upon our discussions, we recommend granting the appeal on the basis of I development, effective January 1, 1995. We also recommend granting the portion of the appeal based upon the Lake Valentine area, effective second quarter 1994, as that is the .- date the appeal was presented. We hope this letter adequately addresses your requirements regarding this issue. Please I contact our office if you have further questions or require additional information. Sincerely, I MSA, CONSULTING ENGINEERS I k= ~ wL Grego . tbnehouse, P .E. I GJS:tw OOQ...1604.lWIt I I I .- I I I. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS MEMORANDUM I DATE: September 20, 1995 I TO: Mayor and City Council I FROM: Brian Fritsinger, City Administrato~F) SUBJECT: Arden Manor Watermain Improvement Project I Background Currently, Arden Manor Mobile Home Park operates a private well for their water source. The I Department of the Army has agreed to connect Arden Manor to a new water source and abandon the current wells. I The City Council originally reviewed this item at its May 30, 1995, Council Meeting, where it gave direction to Staff to proceed with discussions on a Connection Agreement. At the June 12, I 1995, Meeting, the Council ordered the preparation of plans and specifications for the project. The project was originally intended to be completed no later than September I, 1995. Due to I- delays with the Department of Army in obtaining a final approval of funding for the project, Staff was unable to proceed with the bidding ofthe project until recently. . Mr. Stonehouse's memorandum summarizes the results of the bid opening. Because of the delay, the final Development Agreement has not been formally approved by the other parties. In order to move the project forward, City Attorney, Jerry Filla, has indicated that the approval of I the project with the recommendations identified below to be appropriate. Recommendation I Staff recommends the City Council adopt Resolution 95-65 which would include the following actions: I 1. Accept and receive the bid proposals. I 2. A ward the project to Dave Perkins Contracting, Inc., subject to approval of a formal cooperative Connection Agreement between the Army, Arden Manor Trailer Park and the City of Arden Hills. I " Such Agreement shall be drafted, reviewed and approved by the City J. Attorney, I BF:sae I- . ~- --- - -- --------- ---- -----.---- I RESOLUTION 95 - 65 .1 A RESOLUTION FOR THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS I A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID AND AUTHORIZING I EXECUTION OF CONTRACT IN THE MATTER OF THE ARDEN MANOR W A TERMAIN IMPROVEMENT OF 1995 I WHEREAS pursuant to Council Resolution, competitive bids were solicited and received for the Arden Manor Watermain improvement as set forth in the bid tabulation I attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS the City Council has considered the amount of the bids and the responsibility of the . bidders and determined that Dave Perkins Contracting, Inc, is the lowest responsible bidder; I NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arden Hills, I Minnesota: 1. The Mayor and City Administrator are authorized and directed to execute, on behalf of the -I City, such contract with Dave Perkins Contracting, Inc. as is approved by the City Attorney for the completion of the Arden Manor Watermain improvement according to the approved plans and specifications. . 2. The City Administrator is authorized and directed to forthwith return to all bidders the deposits made with their bids upon execution of the contract above specified. I Passed and adopted this 25th day of September, 1995. I Dennis Probst, Mayor I ,. . AITEST: I Brian Fritsinger, City Administrator I - -. j20/064-2015.sep I I i IS~ I~~ I .Sf:;) 1 Co, ;995 . C01SULTL\G K\GL\EER!l September 13, 1995 1326 Energy Park Drive File: 520-061-30 I St. Paul, MN 55108 612'64A.'389 . 1,800,888,2923 Honorable Mayor and City Council fox, 6 i 2,64A,94A6 City of Arden Hills 1450 West Highway 96 . Arden Hills, MN 55112-5794 RE: ARDEN MANOR WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS . EID OPENING Dear Mayor and Council: I The City of Arden Hills received bids for the referenced project on September 6, 1995, at City Hall. Enclosed is a tabulation of bids from the opening. I CIVil ENGiNEERING- ENVIRONMENTAL The City had received two bids by 10:30 a.m. The Contractors' proposals ranged from a MUNICIPAL low bid of $63,860.00 as submitted by Dave Perkins Contracting, Inc., to a high bid of I e::NN'NG $87,375.00 as submitted by Ro-So Contracting, Inc. saUD WASTE STRUC!1JR.A.l The two bids that are presented on the enclosed bid tabulation are summarized below: . SURVEYING TRAffiC CONTRACTOR BASE BID PROPOSAL TRANSPORTATION . ::LEGRICAl/MECHANICAl Dave Perkins Contracting, Inc., Ramsey, MN $63,860.00 ::NG;NEE~ING' I HI/AC Ro-So Contracting, Inc., Centerville, MN $87,735.00 poWER DISiRIBunCN SCADA Due to the short lead time allowed by the Army, no feasibility study was implemented for I SYSE~ CONTROLS this project. The Engineer's estimate, as prepared upon completion of the plans, was approximately $50,400.00 (total construction cost) and was detennined using the mean construction bids from 1995. The discrepency between the Engineer's Estimate and the bid I is primarily 'due to the short construction time allowed under the contract as the Army wishes to complete the work by October 1, 1995. The relative spread of contractor proposals was approximately $24,000 and the low bid was 27% higher than the Engineer's I estimate. The low bidder, Dave Perkins Contracting, Inc., is a responsible and competent contractor, . OfFICES iN, MSA recommends that they be awarded the contract for the Arden Manor Watennain MINNEAPOliS Improvements project. I_RIOR lAKE ST.PAlIl WASECA . ----------- . Honorable Mayor and City Council .. September 13, 1995 I Page Two Recommendations . Based upon our analysis of the Contractor's submittals and the results of our investigations, we make the following recommendations for your consideration: I . The City of Arden Hills should note acceptance and receipt of both bid proposals. . The City should award the project to Dave Perkins Contracting, Inc., upon approval . of a cooperative agreement between TCAAP, Arden Manor Trailer Park, and the City of Arden Hills, detailing the portions of the project to be completed, the I method of payment for the project, the maintenance of the improvements, and the metering concerns between the City and the trailer park. . . All conditions and transactions as noted herein should be subject to review and input by the City Attorney. I If you have questions or require further infrmnation regarding the Arden Manor Watennain Improvements project, please contact our office. .. Sincerely, MSA, CONSULTING ENGINEERS . G r"S1' i . ~\.~ '. \ -, !./ / - V'-- ,..---...,- ~, Greg'o~:tt._/dehouse, P .E. - . GJS:tw Enclosure cc: Steve Maki I 061-0812.sep ,. " . . . , . -. . I .. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS AN ACCURATE 8/0 TABULATION TABULATION OF THE 81DS RECElVED FOR THE PROJECT: ARDEN MANOR WA TERMAIN .CONNECTION A~E MENTIONS~r . OWNER: CITY OF ARDEN HIl.lS, MN NAM~Y J. STONEHOUSE. ?E. OPENING DATE: AUGUST 6TH, 1995 ENGINEER: MSA, CONSULTING ENGINEERS DATE: AUGUST 7TH. 1995 . ~I """'"f ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION DAVE PERKINS CONTRAC.. ROoSO CONTRACTING 'I NO, UNIT QUANT] UNIT PRICE TOTA1. PRIC UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRJC~ I ,l~l ~L- ----L~) (s) ,I SCHEDULE 1.0 SERVICE ROAD WATERMAIN CONNECTION 1 6" x 6"'WETTAP EA 1 2.500.00 2.500.00 7,000.00 7.000.00 I 2 8w x 12~WETTAP EA 1 3.800,00 3.800.00 7,500.00 7,500.00 3 8" WA TERMAIN DIP GL 52 LF 101 55.00 5.555.00 50.00 5,050.00 4 FITTINGS LBS 2S5 4.00 1,020.00 5,00 1,275.00 I 5 MEtER V AUL T LS 1 11,000.00 11,000.00 12.500.00 12.500.00 6 8M GATE VALliE EA 1 550.00 550.00 500.00 500.00 , 7 CORP STOP W/SAODLE EA 1 350.00 350.00 250.00 250.00 8 TRENCH DENSITY TESTING LS 1 250.00 250.00 300.00 300,00 . 9 SODDING SY 600 3,00 1.800.00 2.00 1.200.00 T SCHEDULE 1.0 SERVlCE ROAD WATERMAIN CONNECTION-TOTAL 26,825.00 35.S7S.00 I SCHEOUL.E 1.0 T,H. 96 WATERMAIN CONNECTlON 1 0" x 5~ WET TP.P EA 2,500,00 2.500,00 8.500,00 8,500.00 2 8M X 8" WET TAP EA , 3,500.00 3,500.00 9,000,00 9.000,00 .- 3 6M WA TERMA1N DIP CL 52 LF 53 85.00 4,505,00 50.00 2,650.00 4 FITTINGS Las 120 4.00 480,00 S,OO 600.00 S METER VAULT LS 1 11,000.00 11,000,00 15,000.00 15.000.00 6 6M GATE VALVE EA 1 450.00 450.00 500.00 500.00 . 7 CORP. STOP W/SADDLE fA 1 350,00 350.00 200.00 200.00 8 RELOCATE LIGHT LS 1 50.00 50.00 250,00 250,00 9 REMOVE AND RELOCATE TREE E.6.. 1 250.00 250.00 600.00 600.00 10 TRENCH OENSITY TESTING LS 1 150.00 150.00 300.00 300,00 I 11 SODDING SY 600 3,QO 1.800,00 2.00 1.200,00 T SCHEDULE 2.0 T.H. 96 WATERMAIN CONNECTlON-TOTAL 25.035.00 38.800.00 I SCHEDULE 3.Q It{ELL ABANDONMENT 1 ABANDON WEU LS 1 1:2.000.00 12.000.00 13,000.00 13,000.00 . T SCHEDULE 3.0 WELL A8ANDONMENT -TOTAL 12,000.00 13.000.00 I BID SUMMARY .' ,. 26,825.00 35.575.00 SCHEDULE 1.0 SERVICE ROAD WATERMAIN CONNECTION-TOTAL SCHEDULE 2.0 I.H. 96 WATERMAIN CONNECTION-TOTAL 2S.035.00 38.800.00 SCHEDULE 3,0 VVELL ABANDONMENT-TOTAL 12,000.00 13,000,00 I TOTAL 81D AMOUNT 63.860.00 67.37S.00 I. I- I 520061 BT.l/vK4 PAGE 1 52a-061~20 -- - ---- - ------- -- -------- . IlfJA f".." ~~iJb.~t , I. WATER MAIN CONSTRUCTI())J AND PAYMEIlT AGREEJlEIlT 1.0 Parties. This Agreement is dated the day of . , 1995, and is entered into by and between the City of Arden Hills, a municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Minnesota (herein . Arden Bills ") and 550 Associates, a Minnesota partnership, and its successors and I assigns (herein .AsBocia~eB.). 2.0 Recitals. I A. Associates own and operate the Arden Manor Mobile Home Court ("Arden Hanor") located in Arden Hills. . B. The wells which provide water for Arden Manor contain hazardous substances. c. Pursuant to a Memorandum of Agreement signed by the U.S. . Department of the Army (' Army") on May 2, 1995, the ~y has agreed to pay for a project, as herein defined, 1n order to provide an alternative source of water to Arden I Manor. D. The project will consist of connecting Arden Manor to the Arden Hills municipal water system; disconnecting and I abandoning Arden Manor Wells 2 and 3; and will include all necessary piping, fixtures. excavation, connection to a central service point, site restoration and associated I- construction and installation fees ("Project") . The abandonment of Arden Manor Wells 2 and 3 shall be in accordance with the Minnesota Department of Health Regulations. I E. The Army and Associates have requested Arden Hills to construct the Project. Arden Hills has agreed to undertake the Project pursuant to the tems of this I Agreement. 3.0 Tems and Conditions. NOW, THEREFORE. in consideration I of the mutual undertakings herein expressed, the parties agree as follows: A. Construction. Arden Hills shall prepare plans and I specifications, advertise for bids and award construction contracts for ~he Project all in compliance with the Minnesota Public Contracting Law. . B. Cost Reimbursement. Associates shall pay for all Project costs within thirty days of receipt of an invoice from Arden Hills. I c. Improvements. All improvements oonstructed as part of the Project shall be the property of Arden Hills. I I. I SENT BY: PETERSON fR.-t\1 BERG\1AN 8-22-85 : 11 : 56A\1 : PETERSON fRA.\1 BERG.\i4.~ 612 633 7838:~ 4/ 4 I D. Internal System. Associates are and shall continue to be .1 solely responsible for the operation and maintenance of the Internal Water System which provides water from the central service point in the Arden Hills municipal water I system to the individual dwelling units within Arden Manor. Associates warrants that the internal system has been inspected and will withstand any water pressure I caused by connecting the internal system to the Arden Hills municipal water system. E_ Use Fees. Associates agrees to pay for all water I provided to Arden Manor. Arden Hills shall bill Associates for water usage in the same manner that it provides water to other residential and commercial users I within Arden Hills. Associates shall comply with all current and future regulations of Arden Hills relating to its municipal water system. This provision shall survive the construction of the Project and remain in full force I and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF I the parties have hereunto set their hands. I CITY OF ARDEN HILLS DATED, BY, I ITS: -. 550 ASSOCIATES DATED: BY: I ITS: . b/c1tyjI04609Z3.001 . I I . I ~ -. I --------- I I. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS MEMORANDUM I DATE: September 21, 1995 I TO: Mayor and City Council I FROM: Brian Fritsinger, City Administrator~ SUBJECT: 1995 Storm Water Management Program I Attached, the Council will find Resolution 95-64 addressing the proposed 1995 Storm Water I Management Improvement Project. The Council recently directed Staff to prepare plans and specifications for improvement projects at Lake Josephine and Karth Lake. I The City Engineer is recommending that bids be obtained yet this Fall. Should the bids be umeasonable or timing a problem, the Engineer has suggested that it may be appropriate to hold one or both of these projects until next Spring. I Recommendation 1- Staff recommends the Council adopt Resolution 95-64 approving the plans and specifications and ordering the advertising for bids in the matter of the Storm Water Management Improvement of1995. I BF:sae I I I . ., I . I- I __...m____ \ . \ \, .- RESOLUTION 95 - 64 A RESOLUTION FOR THE CITY OF ARDEN HilLS . A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS I AND ORDERING THE ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS IN THE MATTER OF THE STORM WATER MANAGEMENT IMPROVEMENT OF 1995 . WHEREAS pursuant to Council Resolution, the Project Engineer has prepared plans and - specifications for the 1995 Storm Water Management improvement, which plans and specifications have been reviewed by the City; . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arden Hills, Minnesota: . I. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, are hereby approved. I The City Administrator shall prepare and obtain the publication of an advertisement for 2. bids for the making of the improvement pursuant to the attached plans and specifications. -. The advertisement shall be published once each week for three consecutive weeks, shall specify the work to be done, and shall state that the bids will be received by the City Administrator until 11 :30 on October 26, 1995, at which time the bids will be publicly I opened in the Council chambers of the City Hall by the City Administrator and the Project Engineer and will then be tabulated for consideration by the City Council at a meeting thereof at 7:30 o'clock p.m. on October 30, 1995, in the City Council chambers at New - Brighton City Hall. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the City Administrator and a=mpanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond, or certified I check payable to the City Administrator in the amount of 5 % of the amount of such bid. Passed and adopted this 25th day of September, 1995. . .. . Dennis Probst, Mayor ATTEST: . Brian Fritsinger, City Administrator . . -. 520/064-2015.sep I I . . CITY OF ARDEN HILLS I. MEMORANDUM I DATE: September 20, 1995 I TO: Mayor and City Council Brian Fritsinger, City Administrato@ FROM: . SUBJECT: Pay Estimates . The Council has before it three separate pay estimates for the following projects: 1. 1995 Street Improvements - Valley Paving . 2. County Road F - Midwest Asphalt " Perry Park - Veit & Company J. I The City Engineer will be present at the Meeting to update the Council on discussions with these contractors. Please note the Engineer's comment regarding the Midwest Asphalt pay estimate. . Recommendation I- Staff recommends approval of the pay estimates as provided by the City Engineer subject to City Engineer and Contractor approval. BF:sae I I . I ..I' . . I I- I . . . .1 MElvfORANDUM . . To: Brian F ritsinger . CC File 520-054-30 ! 520-055-30 From: Greg Stonehouse . Date: September 20, 1995 Subject: Pay Estimates I Brian, I Enclosed are three signed copies of the pay estimates for both the 1995 Street . Improvements Project and the Perry Park Improvements The information presented in our letter forwarded to your office last week is still correct for inclusion in the -. September 25, 1995 Council packet. I will be present at that meeting to present the pay estimates to the Council and address any questions they may have. With regards to the August 31, 1995 pay estimate to Ivlidwest Asphalt for the County . Road F project, we are holding that until Monday pending further progress on the project I spoke with Blair Bury of Midwest on September 12, 1995 to address the tabling of that pay estimate and the need for progress, I spoke with him again last . week and as recent as September 19, 1995 to address the fact that MSA remains unsatisfied with the progress being made, If Midwest completes the striping of the . roadway and has initiated sodding within the bOl,llevard areas prior to Monday, I will be able to present that pay estimate at Monday's council meeting as welL Please contact our office with any questions or concerns regarding these matters, . H' . FROM THE DESK OF . . . GREG STONEHOU:::E PROJECT E:--:GrNEER I\fSA CONSULTING E",CI"EERS 1326 ENERGY PARK DRIVE . ST. P.'\L.'L. j'vll1\'"NESOTA 55 1O:':-52U2 (612)644-4389 FAX: (612) 644.9446 . - -. . -..-------- I PARTIAL PAYMENT ESTlMATE I. NO.1 FROM: AUGUST 1. 1995 TO: AUGUST 31, 1995 I CONTRACTOR: VALLEY PAVING. INC. ADDRESS: 4105 - 85TH AVENUE N.. BLOG. B. SUITE 202. BROOKLYN PARK. MN 55443 I OWNER: CITY OF ARDEN HillS, MINNESOTA PROJECT: 1995 STREET IMPROVEMENTS (520-055-30) I COMPLETION OA TE AMOUNT OF CONTRACT: ORIGINAL: OCTOBER 15. 1995 ORIGINAL $ 360,008.80 REVlseo: REVISED $ I il/TEM CONTRACT ITEMS THIS- PERIOD TOTAL TO OATE, MnOOT IIHO. HO; DESCRIPTION' UHIT CTY. UNIT CrY: AMOUNT CrY; AMOUNT PRICE SCHEDULE 1.0 STOwe AVENue I 1 2104.501 REMOVE RCP PIPE LF 20 17.00 26.00 442.00 26.00 442.00 2 2104.501 REMove CMP PIPE LF 35 12.00 38.00 456.00 38.00 456.00 3 2104.509 REMOVE MANHOLE EA 1 575.00 1.00 575.00 1.00 575.00 . 2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION (P) CY 2050 6.00 300.00 1,800.00 300.00 1,800.00 I 5 2105.507 SUBGRAOE 2XCAVATION CY 600 4.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 2105.522 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW - CV CY 600 9.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7 2'05.5 SUBGRAOEPREPARATION RDST A 13.2 165.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I~ 2105.525 TOPSOIL BORROW - CV CY 450 13.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2211.501 AGGREGATE BASE - ClJI,SS SA TN 2300 7.00 219.07 1,533.49 219.07 1,533.49 231.602 BITUMINOUS PATCHING SY 150 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11 2232.501 MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE 5Y 'S 3.50 507.00 1,n4.50 507.00 1,n4.50 I 12 2341.508 TfPE 41A BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE TN 520 21.50 111.00 2:386,50 111.00 2.386.50 13 2340.514 TfPE 318 BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE TN 780 19.85 112.57 2,234.51 112.57 2,234.51 14 331.601 2'" BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SY 230 7.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I 15 2357.502 BITUMINOUS FOR TACK COAT GAL 225 1.35 45.00 60.75 45.00 60.75 16 2535.501 BITUMINOUS CURB LF 325 2.93- 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17 2521.501 4. CONCRETE WALK SF '0 2.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18 2531.501 8618 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER LF 2880 5.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I 19 2531.507 6. CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SY 285 23.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20 2531.507 6. CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APRON SV 180 24.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 21 563.602 INLET PROTECTION EA 12 45.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 22 2575.505 SODDING. riPE LAWN & BOULEVARD SY 4170 1.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I 23 2502.501 4" PERFORATED HOPE PIPE DRAIN WITH LF .00 7.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 riPE I GEOTEX11LE SOCK 2. 2506.509 DRAIN llLE CORE CONNECTIONS EA . 150.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ..,' I 25 2501.567 30- RCP SAFETY APRON & GRATE EA 1 2,100.00 1.00 2,100.00 1.00 2,100.00 26 2503.541 30" RCP PIPE CL JII, DESIGN 3006 LF 33 87.60 33.00 2.690,60 33.00 2.890.80 27 2503.541 21. RCP PIPE CL JlI, DESIGN 3006 LF 614 39.20 515.00 24.108.00 615.00 24,108.00 28 2.503.541 18- RCP PIPE CL III, DESIGN 3006 LF 991 24.75 986.00 24,403.50 966.00 24,403.50 I 29 2503.541 15. RCP PIPE CL Ill, DESIGN 3006 LF 260 22.70 215.00 4,860.50 215.00 4,860.50 30 2503.541 12" RCP PIPE CL JIl, DESIGN 3006 LF 90 21.00 96.00 2,016.00 96.00 2.016.00 J1 2506.508 CONSTRUCT MANHOLE, STORM 48" DIA EA 5 9aO.OO 8.00 7.840.00 8.00 7,840.00 I 32 2506.508 CONSTRUCT BAFFLE MH. STORM 96. DIA. EA 1 6,350.00 1.00 6.350.00 1.00 6,350.00 33 2506.509 CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN, 24. x 36. EA 6 830.00 3.00 2.490.00 3.00 2,490.00 3' 2506.522 ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING EA 6 175.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 . 2531.511 PEDESTRIAN RAMP EA 1 200.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 I 504.602 ADJUST HYDRANT AND VALVE SOX EA 2 445.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1520057#1 ,\lVK4 Page 1 520-055-]G ---.----..- CONTRACT ITEMS THIS PERIOD TOTAL. TO DATE ITEM MnDOT NO. NO. OESClUP110N UNIT QTY. UNIT aTY. AMOUNT QTY. AMOUNT PRICE 37 504.602 ADJUST VALVE BOX EA J 145.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 J8 2511.501 RANDOM RIP RAP, CLASS J CY 5 85.00 5.00 510.00 8.00 510.0 T SCHEDULE 1.0 STOwe AveNUE-TOTAL 88.851.55 88.851.5l SCHEDULE 2.0 NOBLE ROAO SEAL COA l1NG 'I BITUMINOUS MATERIAL. CR5-Z GAL aso 0.82 800.00 656.00 800.00 556.00 2 FA.2. CLC" AGGREGATE TON 44 12.85 37,00 475," 37.00 475.41 T SCHEDULE 2.0 NOBLE ROAD SEAL COATING-TOTAL 1,131.45 1,131.45 SCHEDULE J.a N. KATE LANE SEAL COATING I 1 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL, CRS-Z GAL 750 0.82 700.00 514.00 700.00 574.0 2 FA~2. CL.C., AGGREGATE TON 36 12.85 30.00 385.50 30.00 385.50 T SCHEDULE 3.0 N. KATE LANE SEAL COATING-TOTAL 959.50 959.501 SCHEDULE 4.0 JAMES CIRCLE SEAL COATING 1 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL. CRS-2 GAL 650 0.82 600.00 492.00 600.00 492.00 :2 FA-2. Cl.C.. AGGREGATE TON 32 12.85 26.00 334.10 26.00 334.10 T SCHEDULE 4.0 JAMES CIRCLE SEAL COATING-TOTAL 826.10 826.10 SCHEDULE 5.0 SANDEEN ROAD SEAL GOATlNG I 1 81TUMINOUS MATERIAL, CRS.2 GAL 780 0.82 727.00 596.14 727.00 596.14 2 FA,2. CLC.. AGGREGATE TON 36 12,'5 30,00 385,50 3O'OO_~ T SCHEDULE 5.0 SANDEEN ROAD SEAL COATING-TOTAL 981.64 981.64 SCHEDULE 5.0 SIEMS COURT SEAL COATING I 1 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL, CRS-:2 GAL 1150 0.82 1.075.00 881.50 1.075.00 881.50 :2 FA.2, Cl.G., AGGREGATE TON 52 12.85 45.00 578.25 45.00 578.25 T SCHEDULE 6.0 SIEMS COURT SEAL COATING-TOTAL 1.459.75 1.459.751 SCHEDULE 7.0 RIDGEWOOD ROAD SEAL COAT 1 6'TUMINOUS MATERIAL. CRS-2 GAL 780 0,'2 730,00 '98.60 730,00 59"601 :2 FA-2, CL.C.. AGGREGATE TON J6 12.85 30.00 385.50 30.00 385.50 T SCHEOULE 7.0 RIDGEWOOO ROAD SEAL COAT-TOTAL 984.10 984.10 SCHEOULE 8.0 CUMMINGS LANE SEAL COAT I 1 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL, CRS.2 GAL 400 0.82 370.00 303.40 370.00 303.40 2 FA-2. CL.C.. AGGREGATE TON 20 12,as 18,00 231.30 18,00 231.30 I ~ I,' T SCHEDULE 8.0 CUMMINGS LANE SEAL COAT-TOTAL 534.70 534.70 SCHEDULE 9.0 GLENAROEN CT. SEAL COAT I 1 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL, CRs...2 GAL 685 0.82 650.00 533.00 650.00 533.00 2 FA-2, Cl.C., AGGREGATE TON 32 12.85 26.CO 3::34.10 26.00 334.10 T SCHEDULE 9.0 GLENAROEN CT. SEAL COAT-TOTAL 867.10 867.10 I SCHEDULE 10.0 SKILES LANE E. SEAL COAT . - 1 BITUMINOUS MATEF~!Al, CRS.2 GAL 550 0.82 520.CO 426.4"0 520.00 .40 I 2 FA.2. CloC.. AGGREGATE TON 28 12.85 25.00 321.25 25.00 321.25 T SCHEOULE 10.0 SKILES LANE E. SEAL COAT-TOTAL 747_65 741.55 I 520057:t1.\NK4 Page 2 520-055-30 I CONTRACT ITEMS THIS PERIOO TOTAL TO DATE 'TOM MnOQT NO. NO. DESCRIPllON UNIT QTY. UNIT QTY. AMOUNT OTY. AMOUNT 1., PRICE SCHEDULE 11.0 HAMUNEAVE SEAL COAT BITUMINOUS MATERIAl. CRS-2 GAl. 6140 0.82 5,800.00 4,758.00 5,800.00 4,756.00 I 2 FA-2. CLA. DRESSER AGGREGATE TON 280 35.00 255.00 8,925.00 255.00 8,925.00 3 PAVE. STRIP. -4- SOLID YELLOW LF 9020 0.14 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 4 PAVE, STRIP. - 4- INTERMITTENT YELLOW LF 9025 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I 5 PAVE. STRIP. _ 4- SOllO INHITE LF 9025 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 LEFT TURN ARROW EA 20 35.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7 STOP BAR EA 2 100.00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00 I T SCHEDULE 11.0 HAMUNE AVE SEAL CQA T -TOTAL 13,681.00 13,681.00 SCHEDULE 12.0 ARDEN PLACE SEA1. COATlNG I 1 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL. CRS-2 GAL 92S 0.82 870,00 713.40 870.00 713.40 2 FA.2. CLC.. AGGREGATE TON 44 12.85 38.00 488,30 38.00 488.30 T SCHEDULE 12.0 AROEN PlACE SEAL COATlNG-TOTAl 1,201.70 1,201.70 I SCHEDULE 13.0 FOREST LANE SEAL COAT 1 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL. CRS-2 GAL 750 0.82 700.00 574.00 700.00 574.00 2 FA.2. CL.e.. AGGREGATE TON 35 12.85 30.00 385.50 30.00 385.50 I T SCHEDULE 13.0 FOREST lANE SEAL COAT-TOTAL 959.50 959.50 I SCHEDULE 14.0 GLENAROEN RD. SEAL COAT 1 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL CRS-2 GAL 1575 0.82 1.425.00 1,168.50 1,425.00 1,168.50 2 FA~2. CloC.. AGGREGATE TON 12 12.85 65.00 835.25 65.00 835.25 leT SCHEDULE 14.0 GlENAROEN RD. SEAL COAT-TOTAL 2,003.75 2.003.75 SCHEDULE 15.0 PRIOR AVE OVERLAY I 1 CRACK SEAL LF 420 0.78 214.00 166.92 214.00 166.92 2 cur &. PATCH EXISTING BITUMINOUS SY 210 10.15 84.00 852.60 84.00 852.50 3 TACK COAT GAL 210 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4 BITUMINOUS VVEAR COURSE, 2331 nps 41 TON 405 22.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I 5 MILLJNG SY 1735 0.78 1,657.00 1,292,46 1,657.00 1,292.46 6 ADJUST MANHOLE CASTING EA 2 105.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7 ADJUST GATE VALVE BOX EA 2 85.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I T SCHEDULE 15.0 PRIOR AVE OVERLAY-TOTAL 2,311.98 2.311.98 SCHEDULE 16.0 JERROLD AVE OVERLAY I 1 CRACK SEAL LF 500 0.78 705.00 549.90 705.00 549.90 2 CUT & PATCH EXISTING BITUMINOUS SY 290 10.15 144.00 1.461.60 144.00 1,461.60 3 TACK COAT GAL 290 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4 BITUMINOUS VVEAR COURSE..,2,33t nPE 41 TON 555 22.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I 5 MILUNG SY 2100 0.78 1,993.00 1,554.54 1,993.QO 1,554.54 6 ADJUST MANHOLE CASTING EA 8 105.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7 ADJUST GATE VALVE BOX EA 3 85.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I T SCHEDULE 16.0 JERROLD AVE OVERLAY-TOTAL 3,566.04 3,566.04 SCHEDULE 17.0 SHOREWOOD DR. OVERLAY I 1 CRACK SEAL LF 550 0.78 501.00 390.78 501.00 390.78 2 CUT & PATCH EXISTING BITUMINOUS SY 280 10.15 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 . TACK COAT GAL 275 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 BITUMINOUS V\fEAR COURSE. 2331 TYPE 41 TON 525 22.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I 5 MILLlNG SY 2500 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I 520057~1.WK4 Page 3 520~O55.30 CONTRACT ITEMS mls PERIOD . TOTAL TO DATE I'TOM MnOOT NO. NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT OTY. UNIT OTY. AMOUNT OTY. AMOUNT PRICE S ADJUST MANHOLE CASTING EA 6 105.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7 ADJUST GATe VAlVe BOX EA 1 as.oo 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001 T SCHEDULE: 17.0 SHOREWOOD OR. OVERLAY-TOTAL 390.78 390,78 SCHEOULE 18.0 BECKMAN AVE OVERl.A.Y 210.601 1 CRACK SEAL LF 200 0.7a 270.00 210.60 270.00 2 CUT & PATCH EXISTING BITUMINOUS SY 150 10.15 84.00 852.60 84.00 a52.6o , TACK COAT GAL 150 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001 , BITUMINOUS VVEAR COURSE, 2331 TYPE 41 TON 290 21.50 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 5 MILLING SY 1190 0.78 1,188,00 926.04 1,188.00 921:;'64 S ADJUST MANHOLE CASTING EA 5 105.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001 7 ADJUST GATE VALVE BOX EA 2 85.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 T SCHEDUL.E 18.a BECKMAN AVE OVERLAY-TOTAL 1,989.84 1.989.84 SCHEDULE 19,0 ASBURY AVE. OVERLAY 246,4BI 1 CRACK SEAL LF 2BO 0.78 316.00 246.48 316.00 2 CUT & PATCH EXISTING BITUMINOUS SY 150 10.15 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 3 TACK COAT GAL 150 1.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 I , BITUMINOUS VVEAR COURSE. 2331 TYPE 41 TON 2B5 21.50 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,00 5 MILUNG SY 1270 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 ADJUST MANHOLE CASTING EA S 105,00 0_00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I 7 ADJUST GATE VALVE BOX EA 3 85.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 T SCHEDULE 19.0 ASBURY AVE. OVERLAY-TOTAL 246.48 -I SCHEDULE 20.0 LAMETll CIRCLE OVERLAY. DELETED SCHEOULE 21.0 CONNELlY AVE OVERLAY 1 CRACK SEAt. LF 350 0.78 342.00 266.76 342.00 266.761 2 CUT & PATCH EXISTING BITUMINOUS sy 190 10.15 224.00 2,273.60 224.00 2,273.60 , TACK COAT GAL 105 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 , BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE, 2331 TYPE 41 TON 360 21.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I 5 MILLING SY 1270 O.7a 1,251.00 975.78 1,251.00 975.78 6 ADJUST MANHOLE CASTING EA , 105.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7 ADJUST GATE VALVE BOX EA 1 85.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 T SCHEDULE 21.0 CONNELL. Y AVE OVERLAY-TOTAL 3,516.14 3,516.141 SCHEDULE 22.0 HARRIET AVE OVERLAY 149.761 1 CRACK SEAL IF 600 0.78 192.00 149.76 192.00 2 CUT & PATCH EXISTING BITUMINOUS SY 280 10.15 163.00 1,654.45 163.00 1,654.45 , TACK COAT GAL 265 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 , BITUMINOUS I/VEAR COURSE, ~~1 TYPE 41 TON 545 21.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I 5 MILLING SY 1785 0.78 1,715.00 1,337.70 1,715.00 1,337.70 6 ADJUST MANHOLE CASTING EA 3 105.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7 ADJUST GATE VALVE BOX EA , 85.00 . 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 T SCHEDULE 22.0 HARRIET AVE OVERLAY-TOTAL 3.141.91 3,141.91 I SCHEDULE 23.0 BENTON WAY OVERLAY 908.70 I CRACK SEAL LF 900 0.78 1,165.00 908.70 1,165.00 2 CUT eo PATCH EXISTING BITUMINOUS SY 500 10.15 637.00 6,465.55 637.00 6_ 3 TACK COAT GAL '65 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ~ 4 BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE. 2331 TYPE 41 TON '95 21.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 001 5 MILLING sy 3185 0.7a 3,020.00 2,355.60 3.020.00 2,355.60 520a57#1.WK4 Page 4 520-055.31 -- I ,ITEM CONTRACT ITEMS nus PERIOD TOTAL TO DATE MnOOT , NO. NO. CESCRIPTION UNIT QTY. UNIT QTY. AMOUNT QTY~ AMOUNT I PRIC_E ADJUST MANHOLE CASTING . EA 7 105.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ADJUST GATE VALVE BOX EA , 6S.DO 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 I T SCHECUlE 23.0 BENTON WAY OVERLAY-TOTAL 9,729.B5 9,729.85 I TOTAL AMOUNT THIS PERIOD 140,082.51 TOTAL AMOUNTTQ DATE 140,082.51 I DESCRIPTION TOTAL THIS PERIOD TOTAL TO DATE SCHEDULE La STOWE AVENUE-TOTAL 88.851.55 aB.aS1.55 SCHEDULE 2.0 NOBLE ROAD SEAL COATING-TOTAL 1,131.45 1,131.45 I SCHEDULE 3.0 N. KATE LANE SEAL COATING-TOTAL. 959.50 959.50 SCHEDULE 4.0 JAMES CIRCLE SEAL COATING-TOTAL 6213.10 826,10 SCHEOULE: 5,0 SANDEEN ROAD SEAL COATING-TOTAL 981.64 981.64 I SCHEDULE 6.0 SIEMS COURT SEAL COATING-TOTAL 1,459.75 1,459.75 SCHEDULE 7.0 RIDGEWOOD ROAD SEAL COAT-TOTAL 964.10 984.10 SCHEDULE a.o CUMMINGS LANE SEAL COAT-TOTAL 534.70 534.70 SCHEOUlE 9.0 GLENAROEN CT. SEAL COAT-TOTAL 867.10 867.10 I SCHEDULE 10.0 SKILES LANE E. SEAL COAT-TOTAL 747.85 747.85 SCHEDULE 11.0 HAMUNE AVE SEAL COAT-TOTAL 13.681.00 13.681.00 SCHEDULE 12.0 ARDEN PLAce: SEAL COATING-TOTAL 1.201.70 1.201.70 I SCHEDULE 13.0 FOREST LANE SEAL COAT-TOTAL 959.50 959.50 SCHEDULE 14.0 GLENARDEN RD. SEAL COAT-TOTAL 2.003.75 2,003.75 SCHEDULE 15.0 PRIOR AVE OVERLAY-TOTAL 2.311.98 2.3.11.98 I- SCHEDULE 16.0 JERROLD AVE OVERLAY-TOTAL 3.566.04 3.566.04 SCHEDULE 17.0 SHOREWOOD OR. OVERLAY-TOTAL 390.78 390.78 SCHEOUlE 18.0 SECKMAN AVE OVERLAY-TOTAL 1,989.84 1,989.84 SCHEDULE 19.0 ASBURY AVE. OVERLAY-TOTAL 246.48 246.48 SCHEDULE 20.0 LAMETTI CIRCLE OVERLAY - DELETED 0.00 0.00 I SCHEDULE 21.0 CONNELLY AVE OVERLAY-TOTAL 3.516.14 3.518.14 SCHEDULE 22.0 HARRIET AVE OVERLAY-TOTAL 3,141.91 3.141.91 SCHEDULE 23.0 BENTON WAY OVERLAY-TOTAL 9.729.85 9.729.85 I TOTAL THI$PERIOD TOTAL TO DATE AMOUNT EARNED S140.082.51 S140,082.51 I ,AMOUNT RETAINED S14,008.25 S14.008.25 I MATERIAL ON SITE sa.OO SO.OO :MATERIAL DEDUCT. $0,00 SO.OO ....1 I PREVIOUS PAYMENTS . SO.OO AMOUNT DUE S128.074.26 $126.074.26 I I I . IS20057#1.WK4 Page 5 521J-D55-JC --------- - - - '~ ~_~___'_ "_.~.______,_~___,.. '_~____ _~_____,__~_ _'.__'n ~______ __'__" _ ____ ____ -----._-- -~ -- . -,-----,-~ . I hereby certify that all items and amounts shown by this pay estimate are .. correct for the work completed to date. CONTRACTOR: VALLEY PAVING, INC. . BY: . TITLE: DATE: I Based on the ENGINEER'S on-site inspections as an experienced and qualified . design professional and on review of application for payment and the accompanying data and schedules, the ENGINEER has determined, to the best of his I knowledge and belief, that the quantities shown by this estimate are correct and that, based on such inspections and review. that the work has progressed to the point indicated (subject to an evaluation of such work as a . functioning Project upon Substantial Completion, to the results of any subsequent tests required by the Contract Documents, and to any qualifications stated in his recommendation), and that payment of the amount recommended is due Contractor(s); but by . recommending any payment, the ENGINEER will not thereby be deemed to have reviewed the means, methods, sequences, techniques, or proceedures of construction or safety precautions or programs incident thereto or that the ENGINEER has made any -. examination to ascertain how or for what purpose any Contractor has used the monies paid on account of the Contract Price, or that title to any of the work, materials, or equipment has passed to the Owner free and clear of any lein, claims, security . interests or encumbrances, or that the Contractor(s) have completed their work exactly in accordance with the Contract Documents. ENGINEER: MSA, CONSULTING ENGINEERS I BY: . TITLE: DATE: . ~ 1,1 I Approved by Owner/Commission CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA . BY: TITLE: . DATE: -. ~ . I PARTIAL PAYMENT ESTIMATE I. NO.1 FROM: AUGUST 7, 1995 I TO: SEPTEMBER S, 1995 CONTRACTOR: VIET & COMPANY, INC. I ADDRESS: 14000 VEIT PLACE, ROGERS, MN 55374 OWNER: CITY OF ARDEN HillS, MINNESOTA PROJECT: CHARLES PERRY PARK IMPROVEMENTS (520-054-20) I COMPLETION OA TE AMOUNT OF CONTRACT: ORIGINAL: MAY 31.1996 ORIGINAL , 308.375.00 REVISED: REViseD , I THIS PERlOO: " TOTALTO DATE, -- CONTRACT ITEMS ITEM I NO. CESCRIPTION UNIT OTY; UNIT Qn AMOUNT QTY. AMOUNT , PRICE I SCHEDULE 1.0 . SITEWORK , ClEARING & GRUBBING AC J.2 3,500.00 J.OO 10,500.00 J,OO 10,500.00 2 RE:lOCA TE HYDRANT EA 1 1.000.00 1,00 1,000.00 1.00 1,000.00 J WOOD FIBER BLANKET SY 2000 1.15 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,00 I 4 SilT FENce LF 800 2.00 800.00 1.600.00 800,00 1 ,600.00 T SCHEDULE 1.0 - 51TEWORK TOTAL 13,100.00 13,100.00 I- SCHEDULE 2.0 - SOFTBAll FIELDS 1 REMOVE GUARDRAIL LF 24' 8,00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 REMOve 5. REINSTALL FENCING LF J70 7,00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0,00 I J INSTAll 6' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE LF 190 4,00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0,00 4 INSTALL HOODS ON BACKSTOP LF 120 40,00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 5 COMMON EXCAVATION CY 40000 2,40 30,000.00 72.000.00 30,000.00 72,000.00 6 CRUSHED UMESTONE AGGREGATE CY 800 1S.5O 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 I T SCHEOULE 2.0. SOFTBALL FIELDS TOTAL 72,000.00 n,ooo.oo SCHEDULE 3.0 . STREET & PARKING AREA I 1 COMMON EXCAVATION CY 1000 1.50 750.00 1,125.00 750.00 t.125.oo 2 CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE TON 1650 7.30 960.00 7,OOS.00 960,00 7,008.00 , T'fPE 31B BIT BASE COURSE TON 43. 26.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0,00 I 4 TACK COAT GAL 265 1,00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00 5 T'fPE 41A BIT'llEAR: COURSE TON 43. 27.00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 6 8612 CONCRETE CURB 5. GUTTER LF 1570 7.00 1,378.00 9.646.00 1,37S.OO 9.646.00 7 4" 501..ID Vll'HITE UNE - PAINT ..f' LF 2800 0.15 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00 I a HANDICAPPED SIGNS EA 4 200.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0,00 9 HANDICAPPED PAVE. MARKINGS EA 4 40,00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00 T SCHEOUlE :3.0 . STREET & PARKING AREA TOTAL 17,n9.00 11,779.00 I SCHEDULE 4.0 . STORM SEWER 1 12~ HOPE LF . 30.00 11.00 330.00 11.00 330.00 I 2 15" HOPE LF 270 20.00 141.00 2,820.00 141.00 2,820.00 J GRANULAR FOUNOA TION TON 47 20.00 95.00 1.900.00 95.00 1,900.00 4 INSTALL CATCH BASIN EA 2 600.00 2.00 1,200.00 2.00 1.200.00 . 5 INSTAll MANHOLE EA 1 1.500.00 1_00 1,500.00 1.00 1,500.00 I I 520054#1.1JVK4 PAGE t 520..054-30 . _m CONTRACT ITEMS THIS PERIOD TOTAL TOCATE '. ' ITEM NC. OESCRIPTlON UNIT CrY. UNIT OrY. AMOUNT OTY. AMOUN. PRICE 6 INSTALL lS" SURGE BASIN lOA 1 300.00 1.00 300,00 1.00 300.00 I 7 GROUTED RIP-RAP CY ,. 60,00 10.00 600,00 10.00 600,00 T SCHEDULE 4.0. STORM SEWER TOTAl. 8,650.00 8,650.00 . SCHEDULE 5.0 - TURF ESTABLISHMENT Al.T. A 1 SOD WI 4" TOPSOIL SY 12000 1.60 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 . 2 SEEDING WI MULCH (SEE MIXTURE 400) AC 6,5 800.00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 T SCHEOULE 5.0 - TURF ESTABLISHMENT ALT. A TOTAL 0.00 0.00 SCHEDULE 5,1 TURF ESTABLISHMENT ALT. B I 1 SEEDING WI MULCH (SEED MIXTURE 400) AC 11 900,00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 T SCHEDULE 5.1 TURF ESTABLISHMENT ALT. B TOTAL 0,00 0,00 I ~CHEOUL.E 6.0 At T. BID ITEM. TURF IRRIGATION SYSTEM 1 TURF IRRIGATION SYSTEM LS 1 34,000.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0,00 I T SCHEDULE 6.0 ALT. BID ITEM - TURF IRRIGATION SYSTEM TOTAL 0.00 0,00 SCHEDULE 7.0. LIGHTING . 1 FIELD LIGHTING LS 1 49.000.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 T SCHEDU1.E 7,0. LlGHTlNG TOTAl. 0.00 oe. SCHEDULE 7.1. LIGHTING Al.TERNATES 1 PARKING LOT LIGHTS lOA 2 1,400.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00 2 WOOD palE DEDUCTION LS 1 (1,400.00) 0,00 0,00 0.00 0,00 . T SCHEDULE 7.1 . LIGHTING ALTERNATES TOTAL 0,00 0,00 TOTAL AMOUNT ll-ilS PERIOD 111,529.00 . TOTAL AMOUNT TO DATE 111,52.9.00 . I ..,' I . . - . . 520054#1.'/1.11<4 ?AGE2 520-054-30 I I I. DESCRIPTION SCHEDULE 1.0. SITEWORK TOTAL 13,100.00 13,100.00 SCHEDULE 2.0 . SOFTBALL FIELDS TOT At 72,000.00 12,000.00 SCHEDULE 3.0. STREET & PARKING AREA TOTAL 11.m.CO 17,779.00 I SCHEDULE 4.0 - STORM SEWER TOTAL 8,650.00 8,650.00 SCHEDULE 5.0 - TURF ESTABLISHMENT ALT. A TOTAl. 0,00 0,00 SCHEDULE 5.1 TURF ESTABLISHMENT Al, T. B TOTAL 0.00 0.00 SCHEDULE 6.0 ALT. BID ITEM. TURF IRRIGATION SYSTEM TOTAL. 0.00 0,00 I SCHEDULE 7.0. LIGHTING TOTAL 0,00 0,00 SCHEDULE 7. t - LIGHTING ALTERNATES TOTAL 0,00 0,00 I TOTAl. THIS peRIOD TOTAL TO DA IE IAMOUNT EARNED $111,529.00 $111,529.00 , I ; ':AMOUNT RETAINED $11,152.90 $11,152.90 tA TERIAI. ON SITE '".00 '",00 ;i I MATERIAL DEDUCT. '",00 SO.OO PREVIOUS PAYMENTS SO.OO I I i!AMOUNT DUE $100.376.10 $100.376.10 I I- I I I I .. f~ I I I I . I 520054#1.\l\iK4 PAGE 3 520-054-30 -- --- --..-..--..-- ---~ -- -.-.- ---.-- -'-'- ----~ -. .._--_.._._---~- ----~~-----~--- ---- --~ - -~----- - - -p- --~- . I hereby certify that all items and amounts shown by this pay estimate are .1 correct for the work completed to date. CONTRACTOR: VEIT & COMPANY, INC. I BY: . TITLE: DATE: I Based on the ENGINEER'S on-site inspections as an experienced and qualified . design professional and on review of application for payment and the accompanying data and schedules, the ENGINEER has determined, to the best of his I knowledge and belief, that the quantities shown by this estimate are correct and that, based on such inspections and review, that the work has progressed to the point indicated (subject to an evaluation of such work as a I functioning Project upon Substantial Completion, to the results of any subsequent tests required by the Contract Documents, and to any qualifications stated in his recommendation), and that payment of the amount recommended is due Contractor(s); but by . recommending any payment, the ENGINEER will not thereby be deemed to have reviewed the means, methods, sequences, techniques, or proceedures of construction or safety precautions or programs incident thereto or that the ENGINEER has made any -. examination to ascertain how or for what purpose any Contractor has used the monies paid on account of the Contract Price, or that title to any of the work, materials, or equipment has passed to the Owner free and clear of any lein, claims, security . interests or encumbrances, or that the Contractor(s) have completed their work exactly in accordance with the Contract Documents. ENGINEER: MSA, CONSULTING ENGINEERS I BY: I TITLE: I DATE: ., I Approved by Owner/Commission CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA I BY: TITLE: I ~ DATE: -. . - ____on ____ ____ . ........_. ...m_n. __...._.._ I NO.2 FROM: AUGUST 1, 1995 I. TQ: AUGUST31. 1995 CONTRACTOR: MIOINEST ASPHALT, INC. . ADDRESS; P.O. BOX 54n, HOPKINS, MN 55343 OWNER: CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA PROJECT: COUNTY ROAD F RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT (520-052~3a) I COMPLETION OA TE AMOUNT OF CONTRACT: ORIGINAL: AUGUST 15, 1995 ORIGINAL . 787,964.00 REVISED: REVISeD . 837,492.00 I CONTRACT-ITEMS ntls_ PERIOO TOTAL TO OATE .. I ITEM MnDOT ." i NO. NO. oeSCR1P'TlONc UNIT QTY. UNIT' QTY; AMOUNT QU;' AMOUNT' i " " PRIC!:: "" I . SCHEDULE 1,0 STREETCONSTRUCTlON 1 2104.501 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB LF 125 1.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 2104.501 REMOVE GUARD RAilS LF 100 2.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 I 3 2104.510 REMOVE TIMBER CHANNEL LS 1 500.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 500.00 . 2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION (P) CY 12100 2.00 0.00 0.00 7.260.00 14,520,00 5 2105.507 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION CY 9900 2.00 0.00 0.00 6.9n.00 13,954.00 , 2105.522 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW. CV CY 9900 9.00 0.00 0.00 6,9n.OQ 62.793.00 I 7 2105.523 COMMON BORROW - CV CY 5000 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 , 2211.501 AGGREGATE BASE - CLASS 5A TN 10500 5.30 6,920.91 36,680.82 10,460.91 55,442.82 9 2211.502 AGG. SHOULDERING. CLASS 2 CY 280 14.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 . 2232.501 Mill BITUMINOUS SURFACE (1~1I21 SY 121 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I 2331.508 riPE 41A BIT. VVEAR COURSE TN 1855 22.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12 2331.510 TYPE 31B BIT. BINDER COURSE TN 1925 19.65 2,320.49 45.597.63 2.320.49 45.597.63 13 2331.514 TYPE 31B BIT. BASE COURse TN 2495 18.85 2,131.46 40,17a.02 2.131.46 40,178.02 I 14 0331.601 2- BITUMINOUS DIW SURFACE SY '20 5.65 264.00 1,491.50 264.00 1,491.60 15 2357.502 BITUMINOUS FOR TACK COAT GAL 1900 1.25 250.00 312.50 250.00 312.50 " 2521.512 :;::" BITUMINOUS WALK. 8' WIDE SY 2720 6.10 0.00 0.00 0.00, 0.00 17 2531.501 CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER LF m 12.75 154.00 1,963.50 154.00 1.963.50 . 18 2531.511 CONC. VALLEY GUTTER TRIANGLE SECTIO EA , 210.00 10.00 2.700.00 10.00 2,700.00 19 2531.511 CONCRETE PEDESTRIAN RAMPS EA 9 130.00 3.00 390.00 3.00 390.00 20 2531.501 8618 CONCRETE CURB &. GUITER LF 7680 4.98 6,884.00 34.282.32 6,884.00 34,282.32 I 21 2531.511 CONCRETE FLUME EA . 160.00 2.00 320.00 2.00 320.00 22 2511_501 RANDOM RIP RAP. CLASS 2 CY 5,2 45.00 a.oo 0.00 0.00 0.00 23 2531.507 6ft CONC. DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SY 310 22.00 374.00 8,228.00 374.00 8,228.00 2. 2531.507 6ft CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APRON SY 250 22.00 225.00 4,950.00 225.00 4,950.00 . 25 2531.507 8- CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APRON SY 50 30.00 40.00 1,200.00 40.00 1,200.00 20 2554.505 STEEL PUo.TE BEAM GUARD RAil cF 550 10.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 27 0564.603 PAvE. STRIP.. 4ft POlY.PREF SOLID YELLO CF 10500 2.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28 0564.603 PAVE. STRIP. ~ 4ft POL Y.PREF SOL WHITE LF 6000 2.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I 29 0564.603 PAVE. STRIP. - 4- POlY-PREF BROKEN YELL cF 500 2.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30 0564.603 PAVE. MARK.. POLY-PREF LEFT TURN ARR EA 8 170.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 31 0564.603 PAVEMENT MARKING. POL Y.PREF. STOP B EA 1 250.00 0.00 0.00 o.co 0.00 I 32 2564.531 FURNISH & INSTALL SIGN PANELS SF 100 20.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 " 0563.501 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 3,000.00 0.25 750.00 0.75 2.250.00 T SCHECULE 1.0 STREET CONSTRUCTION-TOTAL 179.044.39 291,073.39 I SCHEOULE 2.0 SlTEWORK .2021.501 MOBILIZATION LS 1 7.000.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 7,000.00 . 2101.502 CLEARING & GRUBBING TREE 40 90.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 2105.525 TOPSOIL BORROW. CV CY 980 8.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 . 0422.602 RETAIN. WALL. MODULAR CONC. BLOCK SF 1050 10.50 800.00 8,400.00 800.00 8,400.00 . 520052#2.WK4 Page 1 520.05Z.:lO ~~'------'---'--'--'---==-"---="--~~ .......-- -- -.. ._~,------,--+.~__~',~O.'-~'__~ _'_~.~-'-,~~_,..:.=" ,..0..'.;;;;; =- ,~ 'TEM MnOOT CONTRACT'TEM3. I THIS peR'OO ,. TOTAl. TO OATE I NO. NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY, UNIT QTY, AMOUNT QTY. AMOUNT PR1c:E 5 2571.502 FURNISH AND PLANT SHADE TREE TREE 3 215.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001 , 2571.501 FURNISH AND PLANT EVERGREEN TREE 27 110.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 . 7 2571.505 FURNISH AND PLANT SHRUB SHRUB , 26.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 8 2573.503 SILT FENCE PREASSEMBLED LF 250 2.75 0.00 0.00 200.00 550.00 I , 2573.501 BALE CHECKS EA 18 15.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 15,00 10 2575.501 SEEDING AC 4.25 710.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11 2575.505 SODDING, TYPE LAWN & BOULEVARD SY 9500 1.45 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.001 12 2575.523 WOOD FIBER BLA.NKET, TYPE REGULAR SY 1000 1.30 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13 2575.523 WOOD FleER BLANKET, rt'PE HIGH VELOCI SY 500 1.70 o.ao 0.00 0.00 0.00 T SCHEDUL.E 2.0 SITEWORK-TOTAl 8.400.00 15.965.00 I SCHEDULE 3.D STORM SewER 1 2101.502 CJ..EARING & GRUBBING TREE 3 215.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 215.00 I 2 2104.501 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB LF 20 2.50 0.00 0.00 20.00 50,00 3 2104.501 REMOVE RC? PIPE LF 625 6.35 0.00 0.00 500.00 3,175.00 4 210"1.501 REMOVE eMP PIPE LF 445 3.25 0,00 0.00 400.00 1,300,00 5 2104.509 REMOVE MANHOLE EA 4 425.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1 ,275.00 I 6 2104.509 REMOVE CATCH BASIN EA 5 425.00 0.00 0.00 5,00 2,125.00 7 2501.567 15" RCP APRON EA 3 350.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 . 2501.567 15" RCP SAFETY APRON & GRATE EA 2 650,00 0.00 0.00 2.00 1,300.00 , 2501.567 18" RCP SAFETY APRON & GRATE EA 2 650.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1,950.00 I 10 2501.567 21" RCP APRON EA J 440.00 0,00 0.00 3,00 1,320.00 11 2502.501 4" PERFORATED HOPE PIPE DRAIN IMTH LF 7100 2.90 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00 TYPE I GEOTEXTILE SOCK 0,00 I 12 2506.509 DRAIN T!LE CORE CONNECTIONS EA 31 175.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13 2503.511 30" RCP PIPE CL III LF 260 41.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 14 2503,511 27'" RCP PIPE CL III LF 262 37.25 0.00 0,00 206.00 ~;~I 15 2503.511 21" RCP PIPE CL III LF 786 28.20 0.00 0.00 423.00 16 2503.511 16" RCP PIPE Cl V LF 1056 25.25 0.00 0.00 601.00 17 2503.511 15" RCP PIPE Cl V LF 477 23.30 0.00 0.00 431.00 10,042.30 18 2503.511 12"' RCP PIPE Cl v LF 410 23.00 0.00 0.00 649.00 14,927,00 I " 2503.511 18"ARCH RCP PIPE CUll LF 110 35.25 0.00 0.00 153.00 5,393.25 20 2503.511 18" RCP PIPE CL HI, 7-1/2 deg. BEND EA 1 160.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 160.00 21 2503.511 15" CMP PIPE LF 2S 20.25 0.00 0.00 o.oq 0,00 22 2503.511 12" CM? PIPE LF 35 20,00 0.00 0.00 35.00 700.00 I 23 2506.508 CONSTRUCT MANHOLE, STORM 48" OIA. EA . 990.00 0.00 0.00 11.00 10,890.00 24 2506.508 CONSTRUCT MANHOLE, STORM 60" D1A, EA 5 1,500.00 0,00 0.00 3.00 4,500.00 25 2506,508 CONSTRUCT MANHOLE. STORM 7'2:' DIA. EA 1 2.150.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 26 2506.506 CONSTRUCT MANHOLE EXTRA DEPTH LF 4,5 90.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I 27 2506,509 CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN, 27" DIA EA 4 760.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 3,800.00 2' 2506.509 CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN, 24" x 36" EA 16 890.00 0.00 0.00 15.00 13,350.00 2. 2506.509 CONSTRUCT SHALLOW CATCH 8ASIN. 24" x EA , 900.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 I 30 2506.511 RECONSTRUCT MANHOLE EA 8 475.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 J1 2506.522 ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING EA 7 270.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 32 2511.501 RANDOM RIP RAP, CLASS:3 CY 35 65.00 24.55 1,595.75 49.55 3,220.75 33 2573.602 INLET PROTECTION " EA 33 37.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I T SCHEDULE 3.0 STORM SEWER-TOTAL 1,595.75 114.470.65 SCHEDUL.E 4,0 WATERMAIN I 1 0504,602 RECONNECT 1" COPPER WATER SERVICE EA JO 531.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 15.930.00 2 0504.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAlN EA 5 4ao.00 0.00 0,00 5.00 2,400.00 3 0504,602 6M GATE VALVE AND BOX EA 6 433.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 2.165.00 I 4 0504.602 a" GATE VALVE ANQ BOX EA 2 560.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 1.120.00 5 0504.602 12" GATE VALVE AND BOX EA 2 925.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 '. fi 0504.602 ADJUST VALVE BOX EA 2 175.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7 0504.602 \NET TAP 6~VALVE EA 1 1,525.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.525.00 I 8 0504.602 SALVAGE VALVE EA 2 BO.OO 0.00 0.00 2.00 160,00 , 0504.602 HYDRANT ASSEMBLYWNAL.VE EA , 1,640.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 9,840.00 520052#2.WK4 Page 2 520-052-1 I ITEM MnDOT I I NO. NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY. UNIT QTY. AMOUNT QTY. AMOUNT PRICE. I 10 2.104.52J SALVAGE HYDRANT EA 5 215.00 0.00 0,00 6.00 1.290.00 11 0504.603 4R DIP WATERMAIN SP CI. S3 LF 25 15.50 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 . 0504.603 6" DIP WATERMA!N SF' CL 53 LF ,.... 15.50 0,00 0.00 1,724.00 26,722.00 0504.603 a" DIP WATERMAIN SP CL 52 LF 1585 17.75 0.00 0,00 1.409.00 25,009.75 I 14 0504.603 12" DIP WA TERMAIN SP CL 52 LF 510 24.50 0.00 0.00 510,00 12.495.00 15 0504.60S 2" POL VSTYRENE INSULATION SY " 23.50 0.00 0.00 10.00 235.00 " 0504.620 DUCTILE IRON F1T11NGS LB 3850 1.25 0.00 0.00 3.800,00 4,750.00 I T SCHEDULE: 4.0 WATERMAIN-TOTAL 0.00 105.491.75 SCHEDULE 5.0 SANITARY SEWER I 2506.506 CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EA 1 600.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0503.503 e- PVC SANITARY SEWER. SOR 35 LF 10 50.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0503.603 INSTAL.L. S- x 4~ WYE. SOR 3S EA 1 400.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I 0503.603 4" PVC SCHEO. 40 SAN. SEWER SERVICE LF 100 20.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 T SCHEDUL.e 5.0 SANITARY SEWER-TOTAL. 0.00 0.00 I SCHECULf; 6.0 CHANGE ORDER NO.1 R1(;~k Watel".'llutd Chao,gu 1 INSTALL GRIT CHAMBER EA 1 16.300.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 18,300.00 I 2 STANDARC STORM MANHOL.E EA 2 1,400.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 MANHOLE CAP SKIMMER EA 1 1.120.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4 MUCK EXCAVATION CY 750 7.50 0.00 0.00 500.00 3.750.00 I Rice Creek Watershed Changes - Total 0.00 22.050.00 I~ S!:wol District #821 Requiremem S" PVC SANITARY SEWER LF 725 22..00 0.00 0.00 550.00 12.100.00 CONNECT TO MANHOLE EA 2 575.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 1,150.00 3 STANDARD SANITARY MANHOLE EA 1 1.500.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 J,OOO.OO I 4 PLUG EXISTING LINE LS 1 115.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 115.00 5 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER LF 350 4.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 SODDING 'MTl-i TOPSOil SY 500 1.45 0.00 0.00 0.00, 0.00 7 SIGNAGE LS 1 500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I School Oistriet #fl21 Requirements - Total 0.00 16,365.00 I T SCHEDULE 6.0 CHANGE ORDER NO. i-TOTAL 0.00 38.415.00 TOTAL AMOUNT THIS PERIOD 189,040.14 I TOTAL AMOUNT TO DATE 565.415.79 ~ i.' I I I I . I 520052#2.WK4 Page 3 520-052-30 DE:?CRIPnON TOTAL THIS PERIOD TOTAL TO DATE I SCHEDULE 1.0 STReET CONSTRUCTION-TOTAL 179.044.39 291.073.39 SCHEDULE Z.O SITEWORK- TOTAL 3,400.00 15.965.00 ' SCHEDULE J.O STORM SEWER-faTAL 1,S95.75 '14,470.65 SCHEDULE 4.0 WATERMAIN- TOTAL 0.00 105.491.75 .1 SCHEDULE 5.0 SANITARY SEWER-TOTAL 0.00 0.00 S_~~E09.LE 6 0 G1:!ANQE QRQE_R ~p. '-.TOTAL 000 38415.00 I TOTAL THIS PERJOO TOTAL TO DATE . AMOUNT EARNeD S'89,040.14 $565,415.79 'AMOUNT RETAINED $33.904.01 0$71,541.58 . i , MATERIAL ON SITE 0$0.00 $0.00 :i I MATERIAL DEDUCT. SO.OO SO.OO I 'PREVIOUS PAYMENTS _0______'__00____ 5338,738.08 ii AMOUNT QUE $155,136.13 S155,136.13 ~: I " , I I I -. . I I . "' I I . ~ . I 520052#2.\NK4 Page 4 520-052-1 ---- -.--- ------ -~--'"'._..- -. _..- - -..------.-- -~_._._- -~_..._-_._-~._--- _._._------ _._._---_._~-----'---- , - I ' . .. I hereby certify that all items and amounts shown by this pay estimate are correct for the work completed to date. I CONTRACTOR: MIDWEST ASPHALT, INC. I BY: TITLE: I DATE: I Based on the ENGINEER'S on-site inspections as an experienced and qualified design professional and on review of application for payment and the accompanying I data and schedules, the ENGINEER has determined, to the best of his knowledge and belief, that the quantities shown by this estimate are correct and that, based on such inspections and review, that the work has progressed I to the point indicated (subject to an evaluation of such work as a functioning Project upon Substantial Completion, to the results of any subsequent tests required by the Contract Documents, and to any qualifications stated in his I recommendation), and that payment of the amount recommended is due Contractor(s); but by recommending any payment, the ENGINEER will not thereby be deemed to have reviewed the means, methods, sequences, techniques, or proceedures of construction or safety I- precautions or programs incident thereto or that the ENGINEER has made any examination to ascertain how or for what purpose any Contractor has used the monies paid on account of the Contract Price, or that title to any of the work, materials, I or equipment has passed to the Owner free and clear of any lein, claims, security interests or encumbrances, or that the Contractor(s) have completed their work exactly in accordance with the Contract Documents. I ENGINEER: MSA, CONSULTING ENGINEERS I BY: TITLE: I DATE: I .'.' Approved by Owner/Commission I CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA BY: I TITLE: I- DATE: I I I. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS MEMORANDUM I DATE: September 20, 1995 I TO: Mayor and City Council Brian Fritsinger, City Administrator@ I FROM: SUBJECT: Army Reserve Memorandum of Agreement I Request I Attached the Council will find a copy of the Memorandum of Agreement between the City and Army Reserve. This memorandum is a result of the Army Reserve's request to consider a change in the jurisdiction of the Army Reserve Site from an exclusive jurisdiction to a concurrent I jurisdiction. Background I The Army Reserve originally requested the retrocession of the Army Reserve site in 1991. This request was to share concurrent legislative jurisdiction with the State of Minnesota over the I- entire Reserve Center site consisting of 29.04 acres. Initially, the Council was concerned about this request for a number of reasons. Historically, the U.S. Army had not expressed a spirit of cooperation regarding local concerns or use of their I facilities or land for City recreational activities. The Army also ignored the City's development regulations and overlooked items addressed in the City's Planning Commission review proceses. I Police and Fire Protection During 1993 and 1994 additional conversations were held as to the retrocession request. During I this period of time it appears the major items of discussion were the provision of Police and Fire protection services. The Arden Hills City Council suggested Army representatives contact the Ramsey County Sheriffs Department and the Lake Johanna Fire Department to provide these I services and attempt to negotiate contract costs. United States Code specifically prohibits the contracting for performance offirefighting or security guard functions. Because of these Federal regulations, involved parties were unable to negotiate these contracts. I ,. The City of Arden Hills has previously recognized its obligation to provide Police and Fire services within its corparate boundaries. I have discussed this issue with representatives of the I Ramsey County Sheriffs Department and Lake Johanna Volunteer Fire Department. Neither of these agencies see any immediate need for contractural changes or increases in service fees. Obviously, future budgets may be impacted if the number of calls to the site are significant. I I- I ------------- - --, . Memorandum of A~reement .1 I have attempted to work with Attorney Filla on the development of a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) which addresses those issues most critical to the City. The MOA is only an I interim step in the completion of the retrocession process. My goal was to develop language which provides the City with a longer term committment to . those items addressed in Section 3.0 of the Agreement. The Army process for such a committment is much more time consuming than expected. The purpose of the MOA is to serve as a short term Agreement until such time that a longer term license/outgrant agreement can be I completed. Robert Wells, Fort McCoy, has indicated that a five year licensingloutgrant agreement will be prepared once retrocession has been agreed upon. Future Actions . The City will need to prepare a letter to the Governor of Minnesota which should state the City's I position in the retrocession request. Recommendation . Staff recommends the Council approve the Memorandum of Agreement and direct Staff to execute such a contract. The Council may also wish to direct Staff to prepare a letter to Governor Carlson indicating the City acceptance of the retrocession request subject to the terms I of the MOA and licensing/outgrant agreement. BF:sae -. . I . I ,. . . I - -. I __.. _. ._._~___. ..__". __._..__. - __ __ - __.... ____.___. __u___ _~_____ I I MEKORAlJPUM OF AGREEMEHT . BBTWEBN CI~Y OF ARDEN HILLS I UP PEPARTMEHT OF THE ARMY, 88TH REGIONAL 5UPPORT COMMJUltJ I FORT 5l'lELLDlG, MINHESOTA 1.0 Parties. This Memorandum of Agreement is dated the __ I day of , 19____, and is entered into by and between the U.S. Department of the Army, u.s. Army Reserve, 88th Regional Support Command (all aforementioned herein "88th RSC" J and the City of Arden Bills (herein "Cit.y" J, a municipal corporation and I political subdivision of the State of Minnesota. 2.0 Recitals. I A. WHEREAS, t.he 88th RSC currently occupies property which is within the corporate boundaries of the City and which is located in the Northwest Quadrant of the intersection I of Lexington Avenue and Highway 96 (herein the "Ar1IIy Reserve Sit.e"); B. WHEREAS, the 88th RSC has formally requested the City to I consider a change in the jurisdiction of the Army Reserve Site from an exclusive jurisdiction to a concurrent jurisdiction; I- C. WHEREAS, the 88th RSC is committed to supporting the public activities of the City; I D. WHEREAS, the parties desire to establish a longer term and closer working relationship with each other in regard to the use and regulation of the Army Reserve Site; IE. WHEREAS, the Army Reserve Site is currently included in an R-l Zoning District on the City' e zoning Map and within an area designated as commercial on the City's I Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map; F. WHEREAS, the parties recognize the existing Army Reserve I Site as a 1e981 , nonconforming use as defined under Section IX of the City'S Zoning Ordinance, G. tfBEREAS$ the Army Reserve Site will be designated as a I public 'use under Section II-D.ll3 of the Arden Hills Zonin9 Ordinance upon the establishment of a concurrent jurisdiction; I I 1 I- I SG~ BY:PETERSON f~~~ BERG~~~ ; 9-19-95 3:57PM ;PETERSON fRAM BERGMA-> 612 633 7839:# 5/ 8 . H. WHEREAS, the parties recognize that should the 88th RSC .- change the facility and/or site plan for the Army Reserve Site in the future, the 88th RSC will be required to I comply with the City'" development regulation" inCluding the application for a Special Use Permit; I. WHBREAS, the parties desire to formalize and record their . understandings concerning the Army Reserve Site by this documentation; and J. WHEREAS , the parties to this Memorandum of Agreement . understand that there will be mutual benefits to each other as a result of the change in the jurisdiction which governs the Army Reserve Site of the Axmy Reserve Center. I 3.0 Terms and Conditions. ROW, THEREFORE , in consideration of the mutual undertakings herein expressed, the parties agree as I follows: A. The City of Arden Hills will coordinate with Ramsey County and respond favorably to comments requested by the I Governor's Office of the State of Minnesota regarding the change in jurisdictional statu" of the real property on which the Reserve Center is located. B. It is understood by the parties that a change from . exc1usive jurisdiction to concurrent jurisdiction will result in certain fundamental changes in the relationship -. between the Department of the Army and the City of Arden Hills that i8 permanent and unaffected by this Memorandum. These changes include but are not limited to: I 1- The real estate subject to the retrocession of jurisdiction and on which the Reserve Center Site . 1.8 located will be subject to the City's development regulations. 2. The City shall be responsible for providing normal I fire and police protection services to the Army Reserve Site at its cost but the 88th RSC will be required to reimburse the City for the costs of unusual or extraordinary fire and police protection I provided such reimbursement is allowed by federal law. It is the desire of the parties that all such costs be anticipated and discussed prior to being I incurred. 3. The Army Reserve site and its tenants shall become subject to the laws and regulations of the State of I Minnesota and the City of Arden Hills. Some of these regulations include but are not limited to: 2 I . -. I ...........'1 U1'~ .....IL.J:\,VV11 ll'U'\l,'l UL..J:\,U",!n.l1 ' oJ ..I.oJ oJU , V.Ull i!1 '1 .....1L.,.l\,-.lV.1 ll\.."1lU ul.....n,U;T.LO.' ........,;... ........,..., "..n.......... ~, ~ . I. a. Allowing access to the Army Reserve Site by local police and fire personnel in the performance of their duties; I b. Compliance with local health and safety regulations including environmental laws; I c. The imposition of legitimate user fees by the City consistent with the imposition of Buch fees against other real estate within the City . consistent with federal, state and city laws and regulations. C. The parties agree that Arden Hills shall have a 5 year I Outgrant or License that will allow it to use the Reserve Center for the following public purposes: . 1. Park & Recreation Co!llD1ittee, 4th Tuesday of each month, 7-9:30 p.m. 2. Recreation Programs, Tuesday and Thursday of each I week, 5:30 p.m. 3. Council Meetings, 2nd and last Monday of each . month, 7;00 p.m. 4. Planning Commission, 1st Wednesday of each month, .- 7:00 p.m. 5. Other regularly scheduled times include the 3rd Thursday of each month at 8:00-9:00 a.m. and every I other Wednesday night at 7:00-10:00 p.m. 6. Polling place during elections. I D. The City understands and agrees that the mission of the 88th RSC and the Army Reserve Site and its tenant units is paramount and takes precedence over any use by the City, but consistent with this understanding every effort . will be made to accommodate the activities listed in paragraph C and any additional activities that may be requested in the future. I E. The City understands that it may undertake a Use of the Army Reserve Site that results in extraordinary energy use or...clean up costs or other unforeseen costs that . could be charged back to the City. No costs will be charged back without notice and an opportunity for discussion. It is the desire of the parties that all such costs be anticipated and discussed prior to being . incurred. . 3 Ie . 3 -8PM 'pr--rrDSO" fD."M BERGMA~ 6l? 633 7838;# 7/ 8 . SENT BY:PETERSON fR.4M BERGMAN 8-18-85 :J,. LJ'-" :, ""', _ I F. This Memorandum is effective only until an Outgrant or . License can.be processed through channels incorporating I the proposed public uses of the City, the five-year term and other standard and appropriate clauses. It is anticipated that this Outgrant or License will be reviewed after each five-year term and renewed for . subsequent five-year periods. III WIrlfESS WBBREOl'", the undersigned have executed this . Memorandum_ Dated: I George J. Steiner, Major General U. S. Army Reserve I CITY OF ARDEN BILLS I Dated: By: Its: . -. . 0/<1ty/10450910.002 $ePte.ber 19, 1995 . I . ,. I . 4 I - -I . I I' . .. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS RAMSEY COUNTY CITIES WEEK PROCLAMATION . WHEREAS, The daily accomplishments of cities, their officials and volunteers I provide the cornerstone for creating, supporting and building the well being of our communities; . WHEREAS, Cities build community through citizen participation, ethical responsibility and the close relationship between elected officials and the citizens they serve; I WHEREAS, Cities build community and drive the economic engine of the state by supporting business and industry, sustaining efficient transportation and . providing necessary utilities; WHEREAS, Cities build community and enhance Minnesota's high quality oflife I through vigilant police and fire protecton, inviting parks, clean water and safe streets; I- WHEREAS, Cities build community by encouraging individuality and promoting cultural diversity while at the same time celebrating the community that . brings people together; WHEREAS, Cities build community by providing leadership on difficult issues block-by-block, neighborhood-by-neighborhood and throughout the - . city; I WHEREAS, Cities build community through the often-umecognized hard work and tireless dedication of elected and appointed officials and volunteers; . WHEREAS, Cities Week 1995--Cities Building Comunity--offers an important opportunity to acknowledge public support and involvement in local government, inform citizens about the wide range of services provided by cities, and celebrate . the importance of hometown democracy; . . Ie . . I L . . Now, therefore, the Mayor, Councilmembers, and the City of Arden Hills, Minnesota, do hereby . proclaim October 1-7, 1995, to be Cities Week in Minnesota and urge citizens to learn more about their city government, to become involved in their community, and to recognize the work done by city officials and volunteers across the state. I BE IT HEREBY PROCLAIMED THIS 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1995. . . . Debbis Probst, Mayor Paul Malone, Councilmember I I Dale Hicks, Councilmember Beverly Aplikowski, Councilmember .e . Susan Keim, Councilmember - . . I . . . I- . I I. 1995 PUBLIC SAFETYf\VORKS COMMITTEE (3rd Thursday 7:30 p.m.) I COUNCIL LIAISON . Arnold Delger - Chair Dale Hicks 1455 Arden View Drive 3590 N. Snelling Ave. Arden Hills, MN 55112 Arden Hills, MN 55112 I 636-6465 (h) 631-2246 (h) 625-1796 (w) Dwayne Stafford 625-1268 (fax) I 1450 West Highway 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112 Leslie Goldsmith 434-6218 (h), 633-5676 (w) 1970 Stowe Ave. I Arden Hills, MN 55112 Richard Fregeau 636-9220 (h) . 3280 New Brighton Rd. 297-8368 (w) Arden Hills, MN 55112 638-9153 (fax) 639-8416 (h) . 379-2810 (w) John Tholen* 1143 Waldon Place Bill Gillies Arden Hills, MN 55112 .- 1736 Crystal Avenue 483-6226 (h) Arden Hills, MN 55112 484-3366 (w) 633-1564 (h) . Mark Stack Craig Wilson* P.O. Box 120021 1677 W. Co. Rd. F St. Paul, MN 55112 . Arden Hills, MN 55112 636-3363 (w) 636-2934 (H) . Richard Roessler 1261 Nursery Hill Lane . Arden Hills, MN 55112 Tentative 1995 Meeting Schedule It.' I September 21 January 19 May 18 . February 16 June 15 October 19 March 16 July 20 November 16 April 20 August 23 December 21 I I- 'Denotes new committee member appointment . ___u__.__ ----- . 1995 FlNANCE COMlYlITTEE I (Meets 4th Thursday at 730 pm,) . 1. Chuck Mertensotto - Chair COUNCJL LIAISON: . 3473 Lake Johanna Blvd, Paul Malone Arden Hills,,\I[N 55112 4374 Arden View Court I 631-9444 (h) 636-9737 (h) 338-5600 (w) 483-7273 (w) 2. Mark Labine' . 1887 Beckman Avenue 6. Car! Rundquist Arden Hills, MN 55 112 3716 Chatham Ct. I 639-9424 (h) Arden Hills, iYlN 55112 644-1739 (w) 631-2347 (h) 348-4228 (w) . 3. Cristine Leavitt 12 U Ingerson Rd. 7. Tom Steele il..rden Hills, MN 55112 3570 Ridgewood Rd, . 481-9144 (h) Arden Hills, MN 55112 296-8439 (w) 631-2347 (h) I 4. Charlotte McNiesh, ad hoc 8. Charles Stoddard 3447 Siems Court 1678 Brueberry Lane -. Arden Hills, MN 55112 Arden Hills, MN 55112 633-1761 (h) 628-0172 (h) 667-8209 (w) I 5. Tom Mulcahy' 3530 Siems Court - - Arden PjlJs, MN 55112 I 633-6084 (h) Tentative 1995 MeeIing Schedule . January 26 May 25 Sep"ember 28 . February 23 June 22 October 26 March 23,.- July 27 November 30" ., AugusI 24 December 21" April 27 ,.' I *Denotes new comminee member appointmem, . **Changed to avoid Thanksgiving and Christmas holiday date contlicts. . :- -. ~ . I I .' 1995 PLANNING COMMISSION MEiVlBERS I- (1st Wednesday 730 PM) 1. Steve Erickson. Chair COUNClL LIAISON 3442 Siems (t. Dale Hicks I Arden Hills, MN 55112 3590 N, Snelling Ave. 633.7964 (h) Arden Hills, MN 55112 290. [935 (w) 631.2246 (h) I 625.1796 (w) 625-1268 (fax) 2. David Carlson (Jeanne Winiecki) I 3535 Siems (t. (633- 77 06) 5. Barbara Piotrowski (Ray McGraw) Arden Hills, MN 55112 3766 Brighton Way (636-4329) 636.7417 (h) Arden Hills, MN 551 [2 I 788-1669 (w) 63 [.9600 (h) 3. Gregg Larson 6. Marty Rye . 3377 North Snelling Ave. [884 Lake Lane Arden Hil[s, MN 55112 Arden Pj]]s, iYfn 551 [2 639-9466 (h) 635-0757 (h) I 490-2162 (w) 4. Brent Nelson .- 1266 Wynridge Drive 7. David Sand" Arden Hills, MN 55 [12 [989 Jerroid Avenue 636.0947 (h) Arden Hills, MN 55112 379.8305 (w) 636.4384 (h) . 334.8538 (w) .' Tentative [995 Meeting Schedule I I January 4 May 3 September 6 February [ June 7 October 4 March [ July 5 November 1 I April 5 August 2 December 6 " .,' .. . "Denotes new commirree member appointment. I I Ie . . 1995 PARK & RECREATION COMlVIlTTEE ., I (Meets 4th Tuesday at 7:00 p.m.) -. 1. Me2an Ricke - Chair COUNCIL LIAISON: 1510 Arden Vista Court Susan Keirn Arden Hills,:i\i1N 55 I 12 2056 Stowe Avenue I 636-2217 (h) Arden Hills, iYLN 55112 22:3 -8000 (w) 639-8857 (h) . 962-0051 (w) 2. Maureen Bodene* I 1825 Lake Lane 5. Dorothy McClung Arden Hills, ivfN 55112 4370 Snelling Avenue N 639-9282 (h) Arden !:liJls, NfN 55112 I 633-3719 (h) 296-1549 (w) 3. Lynette Kreidler I 1518 Arden Vista Court ,'vd en Hills, iYLN 55 112 6. Mary Robinson 633-7084 (h) 1200 Edgewater Ave. I Arden Hills, iYLN 55112 484-1436 (h) -. 4. Anita Larson 935-6868 (w) I 173 Karth Lake Dr. Arden Hills, NfN 55112 7. Louis Speggen' 628-4980 (h) 1910 W Co. Rd. E2 I 290-3553 (w) Arden Hills, iYLN 551 12 636-0827 (h) - 484-2234 (w) I 8. Don Messerly 3915 Fairview Ave, N. I Arden !:liJls, iYLN 55 I 12 633-7022 (h) I 653-2347 (w) -' I ". Tentative 1995 Meeting Schedule January 24 May 23 September 26 I February 23 June 27 October 24 March 23 July 25 November 28 April 25 August 22 December 19** . 'Denotes new comminee member appointment, , -I # . I . I .' 1995 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMITTEE .e (3rdThursday 800 a.m,) July 21, 1995 I L Robb Carlson. Jr. - Chair COUNCIL LIAISON 3377 Snelling Ave. N. Beverly Aplikowski Arden Hills, MN 55112 1742 Grunsie Road . 639-9466 (h) Arden Hills, MN 55112 633-1264 (w) 2. Steve Freimuth 633-3087 (fax) I CPA 633-3863 (h) 1200 Ingerson Rd. Arden Hills, MN 55112 5. Raymond McGraw' I 483-0517 (h) 1427 Bussard Ct. Arden Hills,:\ffN 55112 3. Tom Goblirsch 636-4329 I Norwest Bank 1220 West Co. Rd. E. 6. Terry Nagle 452-7114 (h) Land O'Lakes . 490-2680 (w) 4001 Lexington Ave. N Arden Hills, lvlN 55112 Ie 4. Dan l"'IcCallum 481-2271 (w) McCallum Transfer 3772 N Dunlap Ave 7. Arnold Lindberg . Arden Hills, MN 55112 3520 Siems Court 633-3822 (h) Arden Hills, i'vlN 55112 633-1612 (w) 633-2349 - I 481-3949 (F) I I Tentative 1995 Meeting Schedule .~.,..~ September 20 I January 19 May 18 February t6 June 15 October 18 March 16 July 20' November 15 . April 20 August 16 December 20 I "Denotes new committee appointmenr Ie . . . " I 1995 HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE -. (2nd \VEDNESDA Y 730 PM) Barbra Younoszai, Chair Marv Robinson . 1574 G1enhill Road 1200 Edgewaler Avenue Arden Hills, !vlN, 55112 Arden Hills, MN, 55112 I 636-8997 (H) 484-1436 (H) 641-2394 eX!. 2394 CW) 641-2956 (fax) I Sushila Shah COUNCil., LIAISON 1435 Bussard COUfl Beverly Aplikowski I Arden Hills, :VlN 55112 1742 Granuse Road 636-9833 (H) Arden Hills, j'yfN 55112 696-6701 (\tv") 633-3863 (H) I 696-6617 (fax) 633-1264 CW) 633-3087 (fax) . Hallie A Finucane MN DEPT. OF HUMAl'f RIGHTS 1347 Arden View Drive Adelberto Barica -I Arden Hills, :VlN, 55Il2 Bremer Tower, 7th Place 638-9535 and yIinnesota S treel S1. Paul, MN 55101 . Joann Growe 296-9040 (W) 1443 Bussard Crt. -' Arden Hills, YlN 55112 I 636-9535 I I .' ..,. . ,. . I , , -I ~ . I ~ 1_ietropolitan Council I Working for the Region. P1.o.nning for the Future . September 15, 1995 ...;.;~ -J 1. ...-...... 0'::..' . Dear City Manager, . Here is the latest information on a possible work stoppage and interruption in transit service provided by the Metropolitan Council to communities throughout the region. I Members of the Amalgamated Transit Union, representing bus drivers and mechanics, voted on Saturday, Sept. 9 to authorize a strike ::or Oct. 9 or earlier if union leaders deem it necesary. Because of a I !:'9quired lO-day cooling off perj,od, the earliest tb".t a strike could take place is Sept. 22. I have instructed our negotiating team to clear their calendars and work toward settlement within the I financial limitations and service parameters facing the Council. We hope that state-mediated talks will result in a settlemen~. . A strike will benefit no one. Should there be a strike, no transit service for about 97 percent of the region would be available. This is a substantial impact on customers who ride Transit Operations .. buses 220,000 times each business day. Many of these bus customers live In your communi ty, and depend on transit to get to work, school and appointments. Also, there would be a dramatic impact on general traffic congestion and overall air quality, affecting your I community. For our employees who work in the Council's Transit Operations area, and those of us who are colleagues and co-workers, the threat of a strike is also damaging to productivity and morale. I The main issues in this impasse are the ability to change work rules, so that we can be more flexible and competitive in providing I service, and the hiring of more part-time drivers to match the peaks in service. As you are well aware, during this time of shrinking public dollars, we need to live within our means. .n. I shortfall of $10 million to adequately maintain the current transit system adds to this difficult situation. I We are committed ~o resolving these issues quickly to re~ain the public's trust and expectations for re~iable and efficient regional transit service. Your interest is appreciated and I ask that you share this update with colleages and elected officials. I I .- i istrator . 230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-1634 (612) 291-6359 Fa.x 291-6550 TDO/TIT 291.0904 :vIerro Info Line 229-3780 All Equal Opp:lmmity E:mp~er I I ~ Metropolitan Council ....vorking Jor the Region.. Planning for (he Future . \\ ----- Regiol1a[ Issues Commul1it~ Forums . . . Tbursol1;g! s~tember 08 8:30 noon .' New Bng ton Fami(:9 Service Center , 400 10th Sl NW 6,8-'-1,0 I . ... Tbursoa;g! octobers 8:30 !'lOOn , . . Eoen Fraine Cit;g Center 8080 :VlitcheU Ru, 94<)-8,00 .. I .. I Ke~:)]1ote aDDreSS: "Plarming for tbe Future'l Jim so(eml Metropo(itan Council I ~:- Regional ADministrator '''. Concurrent Sessions: "0"" 0.,.'."""-' I I Transit ReDesign wor~il1g with Commvl11ities , -- I ; ! capita[ BUDgets - Fil1al1cil1g Tra11sit Improvemel1tsj -= . I Regio11aL Par~s al1D Wastewater Treatmel1t ....J Regiona[ Growth Options for 2.02.0 I n Livabf.e Comwl1111ities: I R6~l1DtabLe- FUl1Dil1g GuiDelil1es & Criteria . , i changes to the LanD-p[anning Act: . I ROvl11Dtable-Housil1g elemel1ts of the comprehel1sive plal1 , I ~ J! .- '-'Nj () To RSVP; w{[ LOft :\HHC sweildi 'It 291-6409, I () I . I . Sister City Association of Shoreview 's Third Annual I ,... . ." - .~.< . . l ; L.. ',....' ~,.- A Taste of Poland SEP 1 9 1995 I Thursday, October 26, 1995 C'f" :'.,: .... : .. , . J-' - .... - .._,~.. . ! ~ ' . "n' . Shoreview Community Center I 6: 00 P..'i Royal Reception With Hors d'oeuvre Bar and Punch I 6:00 - 8:30 P.>!. Queen's Regal Silent Auction (items include gifts and fine crystal from Zawiercie) I 7: 00 PM. Greeting and Polish National Anthem I 7:15 P..H. King's Feast of Authentic Polish Food e 8:30 P..H. Command Performance by the Court's Jugglers (featuring I the Dew-Drop Jugglers) I 8:45 P.'!. Program and Granting of Door Prizes - $30 Donation Per Person .. I Attendance by Reservation Only I I I/we will attend the third annual A Taste of Poland. Enclosed is a check payable to the Sister City Association of Shoreview, Inc. ($30 pe~,person). To reserve tickets~ please cut out . .' and complete the reply card, and Names of Persons Attending: mail it with payment to: I A Taste of Poland cf 0 5681 Erik Lane Shoreview, MN 55126 . . Please R.S. v.? by Oerober 15. For further information, call I Home Address: 482-0994. Telephone: I 4 I. PURCHASE I CITY OF ARDEN HILLS ORDER 1450 W. HIGHWAY 96 ARDEN HillS, MN 55112-5794 14749 . (612) 633-5676 THIS NUMBER MUST APPEAR ON ALL CORRESPONDENCE. INVOICES. I SHIPPING PAPERS AND PACKAGES. DCll{ -T( r, f'_L City of Ard<.n rh LL~ I J'-iSCc VI) . Inv~ 01 L.~ A:-rd eil /1] lis, nirJ I YOc-~ ,- I i-,:;''"'l'Tt , L ! 45 2 - '7 3'1 g SHIP VIA FO_B. i I PLEASE ENTER OUR ORDER FORTHE FOLLOWING TO BE SHIPPED AS DIRECTED: OTY. ORDERED QTY. RECEIVED oESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE AMOUNT I ~ :tt I LlCnQ S ,'-. It II er 'SLr- o-n L'J 1[,; ~<; I , I I I I I , I Ie , , I t , , t , I I I I , I I I I I , , I , I , I , , , t , I , , , I , I CONDITIONS Lrni' c GOODS ARE SUBJECT TO OUR iNSPECTION AND APPROVAL. :) 02 '1 ,- IF SHIPMENT Will BE DELAYED FOR ANY REASON. ADVISE US 1M- , ~.nv...tL. I MEDIATELY, STATING AlL THE NECESSARV FACTS. 8Y TO AVOID ERRORS, NOTE SPECIFICATIONS CAREFUllY AND IF UN. PURCHASING AGENT ABLE TO COMPLETE ORDERS AS WRITTEN NOTIFY US PROMPTLY. 1'0-703-3 I PRINTED IN U.S.A I I I I- I -