The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCCP 11-27-1995 - , AGENDA ~ . - ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEETING NEW BRIGHTON COUNCIL CHAMBERS I MONDAY, NOVEMBER 27,1995,7:30 P.M. 7:30 PM. 1. Call to order/roll call I 7:30 PM 2. Agenda Adoption 7:30 PM 3. Public Hearing - a. Adopt, Resolution #95-80, Sponsoring a Community Development Application to Accomodate the Consolidation and Expansion of CPI Guidant I 7:45PM 4. Approval of Minutes a. Approval of November 16,1995, Council Worksession Minutes I 7:50 PM 5. Consent Calendar a. Adopt Resolution #95-79, Supporting Redevelopment of Tony Schmidt Park I b. Adopt Resolution #95-69, Adopting Apportionment of Assessments Relating to Improvement (No. W-78-5.) If c. Adopt Resolution #95-70, Adopting Apportionment of Assessments Relating to Improvement (No. ST-81-2.) d. Adopt Resolution #95-81, Adopting Apportionment of Assessments Relating to Improvement (No. W77-5W78-2.) I e. Schedule Special 1996 Council Meeting for City Appointments and Oaths of Office (Tuesday, January 2, 1996) f. Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, L TD Contract for Services I g. Claims and Payroll I 7:55 PM 6. Public Comments 8:00 PM 7. Unfinished and New Business I a. Planning Case #94-01A, United Properties b. Planning Case #95-20, Ryder Student Transportation c. Pay Estimate #3-County Road F Improvement Project I d. TCAAP Update 9:00 PM 8. Administrator Comments I 9:15 PM 9. Council Comments I 9:30 PM 10. Adjourn . The above times may vary depending upon length of issue discussion. I I November Meetin~s , - December Meetin:l!s November 1 - Planning Commission December 6 - Planning Commission - November 10 - HOLIDAY December 11 - Council Meeting - 7:30 PM . November 13 - Council Meeting - 7:30 PM December 12 - Park/Rec, Committee - 6:30 PM - November 15 - Economic Dev, Committee - 8:00 AM December 13 - Human Rights Committee - 7:30 PM November 15 - Human Rights Committee - 7:30 PM December 18 - Truth in Taxation Hearing - 7:30 PM I November 16 - Council Worksession - 4:30 PM Continnation Meeting (If Required) November 16 - Public Safety/Works Comittee - 7:30 PM December 20 - Economic Development - 8:00AM November 21 - Finance Committee - 7:30 PM December 21 - Worksession - 4:30 PM I November 23 & November 24 - HOLIDAYS December 21 - Public Safety/Works Comrnittee-7:30 PM November 27 - Council Meeting - 7:30 PM December 22 & December 2S - HOLIDAYS November 27 - Closed Council Meeting 6:00 PM December 26 - Council Meeting - 7:30 PM - November 27 - Special Council Meeting 7:00 PM December 28 - Finance Committee - 7:30 PM Novembet 27 - Park & Rec. Committee - 7:00 PM December 29 - HOLIDAY - November 30 - Truth in Taxation - 7:30 PM I I I .. I I ,---- . . . . . -. I . ~ AGENDA ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEETING NEW BRIGHTON COUNCIL CHAMBERS MONDAY, NOVEMBER 27, 1995,6:00 P.M. 6:00 P.M. l. Closed Meeting a. Discuss Pending Litigation - b. Discuss 1996 Union Contract Negotiations - - - The purpose of this Closed Meeting is to discuss the items listed above. - , - AI .- I . I . . . . . I I - - AGENDA ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING . NEW BRIGHTON COUNCIL CHAMBERS MONDAY, NOVEMBER 27, 1995, 7:00 P.M. 7:00 P.M. 1. Call to Order/Roll Call 7:00 P.M. 2. Agenda Adoption - 7:00 P.M. 3. New Business ~ a. Discuss Truth in Taxation Hearing Presentation Materials - 7:20 P.M. 4. Adjourn - The purpose of this Special Meeting is to discuss the upcoming Truth in Taxation Hearing Presentation. - I I . I I I I I . I .- I --- CITY OF ARDEN HILLS - MEMORANDUM - DATE: November 21, 1995 TO: Mayor & Council Brian Fritsinger, City Administrator FROM: Terrance Post, City Accountant @ SUBJECT: 1996 Truth In Taxation Presentation Materials Council has scheduled a special meeting from 7:00 p.m. to 7:20 p.m. on Monday, November 27, 1995 to discuss the above subject. The purpose of the meeting is to review, comment on, and - critique information that Staff intends to present at the Thursday, November 30, 1995 Truth in Taxation Public Hearing. This type of review process was utilized with success last November. - - General Background Information 1. Since the Preliminary Levy was approved by Council on August 28, 1995 (Resolution - No. 95-61) staff has made adjustments to both the estimated 1995 and proposed 1996 14 General Fund revenue and expenditures. 1995 estimated revenue has been increased to reflect very strong building pem1it activity. Likewise, proposed 1996 building permit revenue has been increased to largely offset the proposed increase in the 1996 Ramsey I County Sheriff police protection contract. 2. The Ramsey County Property Records & Revenue Department has provided a truth in I taxation overview packet to local jurisdictions. The packet is enclosed for your general information. I 3. Notices of the Arden Hills Truth in Taxation Public Hearing will appear in the Wednesday, November 22, 1995 issue of Shoreview/Arden Hills Bulletin and the Friday, 1 November 24, 1995 issue of the Focus News. Specific Public Hearing MaterialslItems I I. Agenda (draft) 2. Mayoral Comments 3. City Accountant Presentation I a. Earlier adoption of Preliminary Levy b. Split of taxes by jurisdiction (pie chart) c. Property valuation trends (bar graph/schedule) I d. Components of General Fund Revenues (pie chart) e. Components of General Fund Expenditures (pie chart) ~ f. General Fund operational vs. Capital recap g. Summary Comparison of expenditures, revenue and levies +~._.~ I 4. Questions Brian Fritsinger Review Comments/Ouestions - 1. Other taxing jurisdictions include the Metropolitan Council, the Regional Transit Commission, the Rice Creek Watershed District, and Mosquito Control. - 2. Should a schedule showing Local Government Aid (LGA) and Homestead and Agricultural Aid (HACA) be shown on a per capita basis for Arden Hills and its neighboring communities. Also comment on Fiscal Disparities impact. 3. Levy history is included in summary schedule 4. Explain how property taxes can increase or decrease at rates that arc different from what is proposed. Describe interrelationships between valuation, valuation mix, legislative class rate changes, and relating capacity rates of other jurisdictions. - 5. Management comments by the City's external auditors have recommended increasing the - City's General Fund balance. - - - .. . . . . I I I -. ---. . . I . . - Property Records and Revenue Chtis Samuel, Division Managet . ~ Tom Osthoff, Division Managct 830 Government Centet West 50 West Kellogg Bou[evatd Fax: 612-266-2022 RAMSEY COUNTY St. Paul, MN 55102-1696 TTD#: 266.2002 --("'-"-1\ f"'.-n C:!,..-~" -......" L't' ~~, l,_. "-.j :..~ '. <,.,.-... November 13, 1995 NO\! 14 1995 "'("; ,.",; (ll CdlL') \.\j\ TO: Ramsey County Taxing Districts - - FROM: Shelly Eldridge jp - Supervisor, Tax Accounting Section - - RE: Truth in Taxation Process for Taxes Payable in 1996 - - -_ The Truth in Taxation notices are in the process of being mail led. You may begin receiving calls regarding the Truth in Taxation notices the taxpayers have received. I I have enclosed a copy of the TNT packet that was forwarded to the Rasmey County Board of Commissioners for your information. I have also included TNT/Proposed & I actual Pay 1995 rates sheets for your information as well. I hope this information will be helpful as we head into another TNT season. I As always if you have any questions or if I can be of any assistance please feel free to call me at 266-2042. I I I I .. ~~-~ I MInnesota'. First Home Rule County printed on recycled paper with a mInimum of 10% post-ronSllmer contenL '''i1'~'' , . - Property Records and Revenue . Lou McKenna, Ditectot , 111\\ 845 Government Centet Wcst 266-2199. 50 West Kellogg Boulevatd Fax: RAMSEY COUN1Y St. Paul, MN 55102-16D6 TID": 266-2002 To: commissioner Finley commissioner Haigh commissioner Norgard commissioner Ortega Commissioner Thomas commissioner Wedell Terry Schutten, County Manager From: Lou McKenna, Director Date: November 1, 1995 - Subject: 1996 "Truth In Taxation" Notices - Contents of 'Truth In Taxation' commissioner's Packet - 1. Memorandum explaining: - a. What the "Truth In Taxation" notice is. - b. What steps are involved and when they occur. - c. Factors affecting taxes. e. d. Methods of appeal. I e. Property Tax relief (Tax Refunds) . 2 . Tax Increases on Median Valued Properties by City by Type I of Property (on County Map) 3. Net levy comparison for each governmental unit I 4 . Taxes on selected value properties for: a. St. Paul, I.S.D. i1625, No Watershed I b. Maplewood, I.S.D. #622, Metro Watershed , c. Roseville, I.S.D. #623, Rice Creek Watershed I d. Shoreview, I.S.D. #621, Rice Creek Watershed e. White Bear Lake, I.S.D. 11624 i Rice Creek Watershed I 5. Sample "Truth In Taxation" notice and inserts I .. --'~ Minnesota's First Home Rule County I prinll',lunrPl-yr!coJpa[lf\rWlUltn\!nlmllfllorJotposL.ronslInlerCUIMnt (-,.~Ic'~'.) , . , - Property Records and Revenue Lou McKenna, Diteclot . ~ 845 Government Centet West 50 West Kellogg Boulevatd Fax: 266-2199 RAMSEY COUNTY St. Paul, MN 55102.1696 TID#: 266-2002 MEMORANDUM . To: Commissioner Finley Commissioner Haigh Commissioner Norgard Commissioner Ortega commissioner Thomas Commissioner Wedell Terry Schutten, County Manager From: Lou McKenna, Director - Date: November 1, 1995 - Subject: 1996 "Truth In Taxation" Notices ~ - Ramsey County property owners will begin receiving their 1996 "Truth In Taxation" notices early in the week of November 13. These - notices show the estimated property taxes for 1996 and invite -. property owners to attend public hearings held by the county, cities, school districts and metropolitan special taxing districts I to discuss the governmental units' budgets and property tax levies. Inserts are enclosed that answer commonly asked tax questions, describe the impact of federal welfare reform and invite county residents to attend the hearing at the St. Paul Technical College I on December 12th. Most areas of the county will have modest increases or decreases I in taxes as compared to 1995. Hore than 65% of the homes in St. Paul will have percentage tax increases of 0.8% or less. Due largely to market value increases, properties in the Summit Avenue and Irvine Park areas of St. Paul could have percentage tax increases I from 9% to 12%. Hany properties in the St. Anthony School District #282 will I have double digit percentage tax increases on their TNT notices for 1996 due primarily to an 15% increase in the school district's net levy. The increase is largely due to increased debt service levies for a new bond issue. I Hany TNT notices in Maplewood/North St. Paul School District #622 and White Bear Lake School District #624 will show tax decreases. Taxes in Maplewood/North St. Paul School District #622 could still I increase due to a referendum appearing on the November 7 ballot. .. I .---_. Minnesota's First Home Rule County prlnlCd on fr.cy<>lcd p~per willi a mlnlnmm or 10); posl.CIltl~lImer ~l!llr.nL d~ , , . 1996 TNT Notices (2) 11/1/95 . What is a "Truth In Taxation. Notice? In 1988 the Legislature enacted the "Truth In Taxation" provisions to encourage taxpayer participation in local government's budget and tax levy determinations. A notice is sent to each property owner showing their market value, actual current year's taxes, proposed taxes for next year and % change in taxes. Also shown is where and when the county, city, school and metropolitan special taxing districts will be meeting to discuss their levies. Taxpayers are invited to attend these hearings. In 1993 the Legislature added the provision that Ramsey County, the city of St. Paul and the St. Paul school district #625 must have a joint hearing on the 2nd Tuesday in December. Since proposed levies must be certified early in the budget process and because the law provides that the taxing authority can only lower (cannot raise) their proposed levy, the proposed tax levy ~ is in effect a maximum levy. The taxing authorities do not know the tax impact of the proposed levy at the point it's certified - because many of the factors in the tax formula are not finalized, - "Truth In Taxation" Timeline - County Assessor mails value notices in February & - March _- County Board of Equalization meets in June I County Assessor's finalize values for TNT by July 1st Joint Property Tax Advisory Committee ( Rams ey I county, St. Paul, St. Paul school district #625) agree on overall level of property tax in St. Paul by September 1st I MN Department of Revenue certifies state aids by September 1st Taxing authorities (except school districts) I certify proposed tax levies to property Records & Revenue by September 15th School districts certify proposed tax levies I to Property Records & Revenue by September 30th Property Records & Revenue mails TNT notices November 13 th I Ramsey County, St. Paul and the St, Paul school 2nd Tuesday in district #625 hold joint TNT hearing December (December 12th I this year) .. h_.. I . ... 1996 TNT Notices (3) 11/1/95 "Truth In Taxation" Time1ine (Continued) Other cities, schools and metropolitan special between November taxing districts hold TNT hearings 29th and December 20th New property owners only file for Homestead by December 15th Taxing authorities certify final tax levies Within 5 working to Property Records & Revenue days after December 20th (December 28th this year) All value adjustments & clasification changes are finalized by December 31th Tax statements mailed by March 31st - Factors That Affect Taxes - The property tax levy is only one part of the formula to determine _ a particular property's tax. Add~tional factors are: .... 1. Changes to the market value of the property gives more or less value to tax (new construction, inflation, deflation, demolition). I 2. Changes in the market values for the region as a whole shifts tax burden from one type of property to another I (Commercial property market value reductions in Ramsey County shift taxes to residential properties) . 3. Legislative changes to the class rates, which determine I what level of tax applies to different types of property, shifts tax burden from one type of property to another (The 1993 Legislature's reduction of commercial class rates I from 4.7% to 4.6% shifted taxes to residential properties). 4. Legislative changes to state aid formulas can raise or lower taxes. I 5. Commercial market value reductions in the 7 county metro area can reduce taxes generated from the fiscal I disparities pool. This also shifts taxes from commercial to residential properties. 6. New taxes approved by referendum will be applied to the I market values of each property instead of the tax capacity. Residential properties will bear a much ~ higher share of the new taxes than they have in the past. I -- - . . 1996 TNT Notices (4) 11/1/95 . Tax Appeals Available The only way at this time that property owners can appeal their property values is by filing a petition for review with tax court by March 31, 1996. The Tax Court has two divisions - the regular division, whose decisions may be appealed, and the small claims division, whose decisions are final. If the property is homestead, the appeal can be made to either division. Property owners were previously given the opportunity to appeal their values when value notices were mailed in March or at the County Board of Equalization in June. The only other way that 1996 taxes can still be changed is by reducing the property tax levy itself. By attending the TNT hearing, taxpayers can recommend reductions in each taxing authority's 1996 tax levy. - Property Tax Relief - The legislature provides several different types of property tax relief. The homeowner's and renter's rebates are given to ~ taxpayers whose property taxes are disproportionate to their income. More importantly, a targeting refund is available for - homeowners whose taxes increase by more than 12% from the - prior year. No income limits apply to this refund. Property e. owners file for the refunds using state form M1-PR which is sent out with state income tax instructions. The M1-PR form can also be obtained at post offices, libraries and most banks or by I calling 296-3781 (24 hours/day) or by writing to: Minnesota Tax Forms Mail Station 7131 I St. Paul, MN 55146-7131. I I I I I .. --.. I . .. :; '" '" ;::;-;: :; .. :; ~ ... " lD .. " .. ,.....~ " " 0(" ~ ~ .... . e 0 0 NO"" N 0 ..~ . "' ~......... :j .. '" - r- - - :; >< '" >< .. ... >< ...... .. ;:; '" .... M ~ ... .... ~ .... ,......... ,... ~ "'0 ... u u '" u :>1= ... ... ... t;..-t:!, ,... ... .... '" . 0 +l !:: 0 " .. .. '" .. .... - - :; 0(:; !:: 0 .... .. N 0 " N ... " ...... .. tl .... tl '" tl ..."'~ ,... N ....'" ::l .r! ... .. . '" N ... ... ... . "''''''' ,... ... M 0 +l . '" .... - - - U l1l .... ... " ... '" ... ~ '" 0 .... 0 0 N"''' N '" N" 0 '" '" '" 0 '" ... N N N 0 NNN N N NN :>1l1l ... " ~ ~ " ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ u ... u ~ u OJ E-< ~ '" ~ '" 0 '" . Ul ~ . ~ .... .... " 0 .. " . @ !:: .... .g, 0 . . H . .... . .. H ~ . .rl . .~ " k ~ . . .; . .~ 0 ... . " ... - .~ ... 0 '" ~ '" ,.c: ~ " " > " . . 0 !:: +l OJ 0 '" .. u . " .. . 0 u 0 ... .. .. .r! ::l 0. u ~ ... il' " .... . .. u .. .. .. 0 .. Ii ~ 0 .rl 'rl .rl '" " '" u .. '" u '" u :>18 ~ +l = PI ~ .) ...... .'" OJ I-i +l 1l!L -, "~ -- t ~" . : ~~ J 0.... 0.0 !:: ~J3 I :.r;.:;: ~~ Oli-l OJ ~ I-i 13 ~ '-0 ... .. PI tIl . '" OJ I-i ~ ...... "- ~ .rl ii: ]5 "d ~ l1l 5! .,.. - OJ l1l ~ 1l u- ::l 8 0 tl 0 \ . 0 r-! \ ~ ....... - l1l~ ~ ,s . .... .. . . . 0. >0'1 ~-::! .rl ~ ;l k.... ~o . .. .. . > 0'1 r-! .:j.~ ~~ 8'.... ~. !::..-l l1l " ~ ~tS ~ j kO .... l1l .r! !:! "U 0 "V - . .r! OJ U -""L ~~ 'tl r-! I-i L-J o " I ~ {J OJ ~ rf"') 8 ~ g ~ ~ ~ I .rl '" . ~ .. ... !:: 0 ., :: . . 0 PI U , a ~~ . I " ~~ ~ Ul"d 0 ~ ~ < " :(~ (j) (j) r-! Ii' ~ Ul l1l ro 0 .r! " . I 8 o.+l " k o !:: Jl . !:: ~ (j) ... go ~~ k .r! PI "d ,\! ~f .. .r! --" I OJ . Ul tJ1 Ul (j) .aJ :;'0<( :; :;0( :; 0(:; 0(:; - ..0( ..:; -- ~ :> ~ 0( 0( 0( 0( .. .. .... .. ~ ....... .... .... '" ........ "'.... '" ....0 ....'" ... "'.... "'" ..'" .. l1l .z " z .; z.. ." .; " . z . ." '" N ,... '" e 0 ,...N "'0 " ,.c:1l1 I-i - - - - - - - -- I u 0'1 0 .... >< ;;:'" ;;: :; .. ;;:0( .... - ..;;: 0(:; N >< .. ..;;: ..:; ;;:.. .. .... .. ... "'~ N ,... ... ...... N'" 0 0" ....'" ... .... '" ~~ ~... "'N '" 0'1 fxI u 0 ." z u OJ..-l '" eM 0 M :j ON M ON :j '" 0 M~ "0 :jM ,... 0 - 0 tJ1 .... . .... 0( ;;: .. .... .... .. ..:; "';;: .... " .. ..;;: .... .... .. I l1l OJ ... tl "'0 .... '" '" N" ""0 ~ "',... 0'" ... tl 0 ..... ~M "',... ,... +lr-! '" z .; '" .; . eM .. 0.. ...'" M MN ..0 . M "'.. .... OM ~ .0 .... - - - - .... M (j) l1l '" ... '" ... 0 ...'" ... .. ... ..... ...'" ... ..... ..... 0 '" "'.. NM ...'" N U ~ ... 0 NN N N N N N NN N NN NN ... 0 N NN "'N NN " " "'''' '" ~ '" "'.. ~ ~ .. "'~ .... " '" "'.. N~ "'~ N I ~ ~ u " u OJ PI ~ '" " " '" 0 k . " 0 PI .... . .. > .... .:l " .. " 0 " " tn .. -- '" . > . .... . . 0 ... .~ ... . " " . " .~ . ~ .. 0 ... .... ~ > . " . ... .g, . 0 .rl . .. . H . ;l u ... ii " ~ 0 .~ " '" .... ... 0 . " " .... 0 k . " .rl .'i U '" 0 0 H " ii 0 . . u .:J ..... '" ~ .. .:J .... 0 " .... {i .. .. . ~ " " 0 " .... .. " .. t . .; G .'( ... 0 0 " 0. ~ Ii .... . .rl J.- '" '" z '" '" U H H " '" I Median Market Value of Homes in Ramsey County by City . Payable 1995 to Payable 1996 e Payable 1995 Payable 1996 Median Median Municipality Market Value Market Value % Change Arden Hills $127,500 $130,150 2.08% Falcon Heights 109,600 111,400 1.64% Gem Lake 100,800 102,900 2.08% Lauderdale 70,600 71,400 1.13% - Little Canada 99,950 101,950 2.00% Maplewood 86,100 88,200 2.44% - Mounds View 83,100 85,300 2.65% - New Brighton 102,900 107,300 4.28% North Oaks 247,600 256,300 3.51% e~ North Sl. Paul 78,900 81,400 3.17% Roseville 95,900 98,300 2.50% I Sl. Anthony 111 ,900 112,800 0.80% Sl. Paul 67,800 68,100 0.44% I Shoreview 115,000 118,400 2.96% Spring Lake Park 79,200 81,000 2.27% I Vadnais Heights 105,200 108,400 3.04% White Bear Lake 85,200 87,500 2.70% I White Bear Township 100,900 104,050 3.12% I I I Prepared by: Ramsey County, Property Records & Revenue, Local Government Div. (SE) 10130/95 \TN'N6AVEVl.WK-4 -. ._--~ I NET TAX LEVY COMPARISON . ACTUAL PAYABLE 1995 LEVY VS. PROPOSED PAYABLE 1996 LEVY - (Ramsey County Portion Only) . NET TAX CAPACITY LEVIES M.l\RKETVALUE BASED LEVIES Actual Proposed Actual Proposed Payable 1995 Payable 1996 Payable 1995 Payable 1996 Percent Market Matket Percent Taxina Authority Net Tax Levy Net Tax Levy Chm!9ll Based Lew Based Levy Chanae Ramsey Caunty $140,300,667 $145,220,291 3.51% NA NA NA County Library 5,959,919 6,163,625 3.42% NA NA NA County Levies for Watersheds 474,719 222,539 -53.12% NA NA NA Total County . $146,735,305 ~ $151,606,455 3.32% CitvorTown /Nf,Pd>,)loiJ ~13 p^",,\f:: I,lL+) ,W l!i."'% Arden Hillst \ A $1,734,150 <;1/70 $1,794,320 3.47% $0 $0 0.00% Blaine 54,775 62,031 13.25% 0 0 0.00% Falcon Heights 520,867 549,081 5.42% 0 0 0.00% Gem Lake 84,000 84,000 0.00% 0 0 0.00% Laudetdale 385,734 399,608 3.60% 0 0 0.00% Little Canada 1,404,067 1,454,816 3.61% 0 0 0.00% Maplewood 6,547,185 6,648,516 1.55% 432,300 394,300 -8.79% Mounds View 1- 1,593,228 q s- .,q't 1,688,822 6.00% 0 0 0.00% - New Brighton", 2,656,100 1.013,'''0 2,864,200 7.83% 0 0 0.00% North Oaks 591,659 590,616 -0.18% 0 0 0.00% - North SI. Paul 1,029,156 1,095,905 6.49% 0 0 0.00% Roseville 'f. 5,901,216 S"lfYi'7 5,955,653 0.92% 0 0 0.00% - SI. Anthony 524,939 563,773 7.40% 0 0 0.00% SI. Paul 66,460,223 66,461 ,547 0.00% 0 0 0.00% . <<reviewi- 3,733,428 ue %,0 4,002,388 7.20% 0 0 0.00% . ing Lake Park 12,986 J 14,378 10.72% 0 0 0.00% dnais Heights 1,245,324 1,464,389 17.59% 0 0 0.00% I White Beat Lake 2,469,882 2,561,702 3.72% 0 0 0.00% Town of White Beat 912,564 1,115,458 22.23% 0 0 0.00% Total City & Town $97,861,483 $99,371,203 1.54% $432,300 $394,300 -8.79% I SID22l1i I.S.D. #282 $2,028,527 $2,333,731 15.05% $0 $0 0.00% I.S.D. #621 39,656,214 39,878,797 0.56% 0 0 0.00% I I.S.D. #622 24,892,121 20,887,389 -16.09% 0 0 0.00% I.S.D. #623 31,936,530 33,927,541 6.23% 0 0 0.00% \.S.D. #624 21,848,180 21,118,251 -3.34% 0 0 0.00% I.S.D. #625 111,431,635 120,234,734 7.90% 0 0 0.00% I N.M.I.S.D. #916 624,967 665,918 6.55% 0 0 0.00% Total School $232,418,174 $239,046,361 2.85% $0 $0 0.00% I Soecial Taxing Disbicts Blaine HRA $778 $853 9.64% NA NA NA Light Rail Authority 305,655 49,882 -83.68% NA NA NA Met Council 1,679,340 2,434,039 44.94% NA NA NA I Metro Watershed 1,543,968 1,702,765 10.28% NA NA NA Mosquito Control 1,232,822 940,365 -23.72% NA NA NA North Suburban Hospital 35,499 42,296 19.15% NA NA NA I Regional Ttansit 12,800,682 12,840,418 0.31% NA NA NA Rice Cteek Watershed 358,546 357,670 -0.24% NA NA NA SI. Anthony HRA 5,440 5,321 -2.19% NA NA NA -' Paul HRA 806,534 813,896 0.91% NA NA NA Paul Port Authotity 842,076 823,282 -2.23% NA NA NA alley Branch Watetshed 13,499 26,609 97.12% NA NA NA Total Special Districts $19,624,839 $20,037,396 2.10% NA NA NA I Total Net Levy $496,639,801 $510,061 ,415 2.70% $432,300 $3g-4,".300 -8.79% \TNn96lV)'com.wk-4 Prepared by: Ramsey County, Ptoperly Records & Revenue. Local Government Div. (SE)10/30/95 .. Your Proposed Property Tax for 1996 ~ I This is Not a Bill · Do Not Pay I . - RAMSEY COUNTY The amounl of property tax: shown below is being proposed by your city or township, school district, county, and . metropolitan special taxing districts. .:, Owner(s): PIN: 02-28-22-4 \ -0029-6 MICHAEL W & CLARE T MCGRAOE Property: 2249 OELlRIDGE AVE ST PAUL MN 55119-5051 2249 OElLRIDGE AVE AFTON HEIGHTS ADDITION lOT 29 BLK 1 The market values to lhe righl are final and are not a subject lor Final Taxable Markel Value for 1995 Taxes: $32,000 lhe upcoming budget hearings, They were discussed wilh the Final Taxable Market Value for 1996 Taxes: $32,000 County Assessor or reviewed at the County Board of Equalization Property Classification: RES, HSTD hearings held earlier this year. The final laxable market values ; -~:' may reflect a reduction under the limiledmarkelvalue law. lithe .J. abovepropertyisaqualifyir1ghomcslead.thelinalta~ablemarket ." value lor 1996 taxes m<1Y exclude improvements you made to the property. This is NOT your final tax bill. It is only the proposed tax.. Do Not Pay Your Property Increasel Percenlof Property T" Decrease Increasel Tax Proposed Proposed Decrease Budget Hearing for 1995 lor 1996 over 1995 Proposed Dales and Locations - CITY OF 'ST. PAUL DECEMBER 12,1995 6:30PM BUDGET OFFICE $ 56.60 $ 54.45 $ -2.15 -3.8:!. ST. PAUL TECHNICAL COLl - ROOM 240, CITY HALL 235 MARSHALL AVENUE ST. PAUL, MN 55102 ST. PAUL, M" - SCHOOL OISTRICT 625 DECEM8ER 12,1995 .6:30PM EXCESS REFERENDUM TAX .00 .00 -1-.00 "fA ST. PAUL TECHNICAL COll REMAINING SCHOOL TAX 95.38 99.88 +4.50 +4.7% 235 MARSHALL AVENUE - ST. PAUL, MN SCHOOL DISTRICT 625 _! BUS!NESS AFFAIRS-2NDFLR 360 COLBORNE STREET ST. PAUL, MN 55102-3299 County 01 Aamsey Dec. 12, 19956:30 PM CountyManager'sOlrice 59.95 58.69 -1.26 -2.1% 51. Paul Technical College 15 Kellogg Blvd.W.#250 235 Marshall Ave. I St.Paul, MN 55102 St.paul, MN Special Taxing Districts: Dec. 4. 19956:00 PM Metro. Spec. Tax Qists.: 6.65 6.59 - .06 - .9% Met. Council Chambers Mears ParkCenlre Mears Park Centre 230 Easl Fifth Street 230 East Fil1h Slreet I St.Paul, MN 55101 51. Paul, MN Olher Spec. Ta~ing Disls: 4.3B 4.53 -1-.15 -1-3.4% NO MEETING REQUIRED Fiscal DisparilyTax: Tax Increment Tax: I Totals (Excluding $ 222.96 $ 224.14 $ +1.18 -1-.5% Special Assessmen1s) The second column shows lhetotal amounts of property tax your county, school district, city or I The first column shows Ihe township, and metropolilan special taxing propertytaxyoupaidin1g9S districts wilIcollecl from you in 1996ilthey 10 your city or township, approve the property lax amounls they are now school dis\ricl.lhe county, CDnsidering.Anyupcoming relerendums,legal and special taxing districts. jUdgments,naluraldisasters,ilndspcciill I assessme-nts could result in increasing 11leSeamOurlts. The amounts shown forothor special tilxing '-- districls--such as watershed districtsn are the tolals for all otllerspecial laxing I distncts in which your property is located. No meeting IS required for these districts. -- ~-"-_.- I Your city council, school districlboard, county board 01 commissioners, and Ihe metropolilan specialtaxirlg districts soon will decide lhe amounto! property taxes needed in 199610 pay lor sE!rvices they provide. Then Ihey will hold public meetings to discuss their 1 996 budgets. {The school dlstricl will discuss the 1995 bUdget}. You are Invited -- 10 attend these meetlngs to express your opinion on the proposed property lax lor 1995. (Times and places shown in the last column.) ---~ II you cannot aNend, you may send your comments 10 any or ail ot the addresses listed above In \lle lelt l1and column. ---~-_.._._--_._- ---..'-.- I This Is NOT a Bill. DO NOT PAY .. 'u'l \\ -..,,I. 11 /1...,. - l i. Most often as~~d}IUestions about . " '''"''~~ v9 Prope~fty;'Taxes n' .<n........ 'I".!;!I . Q Is there any state assistance to help pay Q Why is the proposed County spending" . property taxes? . up? , 'if. Yes 'if Increased crime rates. i.Hi:',: /1- . ~. : ' '~ :... Taraetlna In response 10 citizen demand, the state toughened::" A special state~p[]jd properly lax relief program (sometimes penalties f~r ~rime. T11i,s means tax increases 10 supp8rt called ~[argeling") is available 10 eligible homeowners the courls, Jails, correctional programs, and County whose 1996lilxes have increased over 12% or $100 from Atlorney activities arc paid for by County property laxes. [he prior year reaardless of income The sIdle also helped meel these needs with some, '" increases in criminLlI justice slale financial aid. Due 10.. H you are eligible for lhe "targeting~ refund, the State will incrcas?d ~cmand f~r jail s~.~ce, the Cou.nly w!lI be_ mail you the form in the spring of 1996, shortly after you expanding Its detention faCilities for both Juveniles and receive your actual tax statement. If you don't receive a adults. form and leel you are eligible, ,,1I296.3781 (24 hrsl day). Circuil Breaker Q Do highet taxes mean the cities, school A separate income-based relief program (sometimes called . districts] county and special taxing lh: "circuit breaker") also is available. To be eligible for districts are spending more money? .1 ': thiS property tax refund, a homeowner must have a lotal household income of less lhan $62,000. (This is an app:oximate amount. The exact dollar amount will be fi. Not necessarily. available by Ihe end 01 1995.) S d' d .. I fl. d ' .' pen 109 eCISlons are on y one ac or In etermmlng your __ . . . properly lax. Some other factors are: The form for thiS refund IS automatically senllo you for the A .. I ' k I I . I. :' . . n Increase In your proper y s mar e va ue can ncrease _ current year If you applied for a refund in the previous year. t If you feel you are eligible for this refund and did not y~r axes: th k t 1 f th' h 1 receive a form call 296-3781. ,langes In e mar e va ues or e region as a woe _ ' sh,fllax burdens from one type of properly to another:' . For example, commercial property value reduclions inS!. _ Q Can you appeal your final market vaiue fat Paul or Minneapolis can shilllaxes fa county residential . 1996 taxes? properties.' , . ,I I The stale can change the level of taxes or the amoun~ of Q1 slate aid paid to each property, which may result in a lax /1-. Yes. shifl. n 'I An appeal can be filed with lhe Minnesola State Tax Cour!. I This needs to be done by March 31,1996. Contacl: Because any of these factor~ (?r olhers) may ~ffecl your Minnesola Stale Tax Court, 25 Conslilution Avenue, tax, your property lax may slillln.crease. even If you.r n:arkel Judicial Center, 2nd Floor, St. Paul, MN 55155. value stays the same and even If the City, school districts and county do not increase their budgets. I Q What city services ate paid for with property taxes? I fi. Basic Services, Who determines property taxes? In Saint Paul, for example, approximately 75 percent of Property taxes are determined by the decision of the legislature, properly taxes pay for police, fire, libraries, and park and cities, school districts. counly and other special laxing authori,; I recreation services. Other cilies in Ramsey County may lies like the Watershed Dislrict They all share lhe responsibilitY spend similarly for these basic services. of determining your property lax. " " I Q Is the proposed Saint Paul School District St,le Leoist,tu" .tr:'I: . ' . oe~nes.properly[ypesandrales -:':'::-i" levy Increase necessary? . Delermmes levels of local govemment services I I . Decides levels of slale aid .. ~.I I fi. Yes. Here's why. Cilies School Districts. .J Countv Assessor: .!:[ , , . the Counlv and other . Determincsmarkelvalve . District enrollment growth continues 811200 students per ~ecial Taxina Districls of properties . . '".': it year, lhe distric! has reopened, expanded or acquired . Determine the amount of . Assigns pr?perty. ~Ias:s facililies 10 meet lhe needs. properly lax revenue to properhes ,.. i .. . necessary 10 fund local SpeCial education needs and mandated ser:lces government services - ~ continue to grow. r , Slale aid calculation fadors, including tax delinquencies, ... PROPERTY ,-.-. I conlinue to shift greater responsibility to local property TAX taxpayers for education funding. - ._- .. .~." . .~_. --.- City of Saint Paul . Ramsey County Saint Paul Public Schools - District 625 e - invite you to attend a Public Hearing on the amount of property taxes each governmental unit is proposing to collect to pay for the cost of services each will provide in 1996. All City of Saint Paul and Ramsey County residents are irwited to attend the joint public hearing to express their opinions on the proposed amount of property taxes on: Tuesday, December 12, 1995 - 6:30 p.m. - Saint Paul Technical College Auditorium - 235 Marshall Avenue e. Free parking in Technical College lots. (Overflow parking available at Cathedral, two blocks south.) I . Persons needing handicarred accessibility may go to the cafeteria. I Hearing will be broacbst LIVE on Saint Paul Cable Channel 32. I Deaf/hard.of.hcaring il1terprcters will be available at the hearing and by viewing Saint Paul Cable Channcl32. I Ramsey County property appraisers will be available for individual market value consultations beginning at 5:30 p.m. . ....-... I ~ ~ cB ~ tra:l.rir ]a :infuma::" . - - . pm! lffi Y el prcgrma de lITj=t03 cB p:cpis::W, Die. 12, alas 6:3J cB ]a tat1:E, EI1 el 9:. Pail TEdn:iml Cblla::ft Punta- riU11, 235 Mor.sh3ll A V20.."e. I MBj = flrrxb ytaV txIBi.s 1us !aU S'l~ thiab bdBi.s aN 1us piav br;g txoj -. kef tran S2 rau tej 'Rlj 1:&. l1b 12 hlis ntuj, brill dm 12, trnun 6 rrro )J yew l:s3us tini, rrft rau ffiN 1Lb 1:.931 St. PaiL TEdnic3l Cb1lEg2, 235 Morshill A wn.B. . U_" ~-- ---- I ______________n__..________ II-~J-!: J:.:: :N -: UL::. . Comperieon d laxn en; ARDEN HillS - 621/R) . T.. carnpoo;_ an _ (5) MIocted _ home81.... pI"OIlOfti.. ...umlng tho! lho_1IIlIue Irocnl.... 2.06'" from Pll~aDll!l1995 '0 Payable 1996. - Estimaled II. P.yollle 1995 P.yable 1996 Iner. Loe" Tax Rato LoeoI Tax Rot. (!leer.) 132.383% 128.221% -3.14% H_Nd (CIaoa la) 1995: 1% of 1st 72.000 EMV; 2'll. 01_ 1996: 1 % of 1.. 72.000 EMV, 2% of ex""". Est. E......... 1995 1_ '14 Mo_ T.. Not Tax Net lnor. lner, V..... C....,;ty Tox Cagac:Jtv Tox (Doer.) (!leer.) - - S50,OOO $500 $682 $510 $654 (S8) -1.2111. -- 72.000 no 953 750 962 9 0.94% - 100.<XXl 1.280 1.695 1.322 1.695 0 0.00% - 115.000 1.580 2.092 1.628 2.087 (5) -ll.24% . 150.000 2.280 3.018 2.342 3.003 (15) -O.SO'll. - - I' Tax c::ornpiIriwn on ..Ieoted CommeteRdllnduttriat prop4lrtift; a8SUming 'hatlho msrIt81 ...... It. \he Nrne from Pay3bll!l: 1995 to Payable 1996. Comrne<eioll1nduolrial (CIaa 3A) 1995: 3.0% of 1.'100,000 EMV: 4.6% of axea.. n 1996: 3.0% 01 10t 100,000 EMV: 4.6% of a""'.. I Est. Estimated 1995 1996 'Ilo Ma_ t.. Not Ta. Net Inef. I"",. ... Volue Caoacity Tax Cal?8:~~~.. Tax (Deer.) (Deer.) I .._~ S1OO.OOO 53.000 53.994 $3.000 $3.959 (S35) -ll.88'1lo 500,000 21,400 28.493 21.400 28,238 (255) -ll.89% I 1.000,000 44,400 58.117 44.400 58.588 (531) -0.90% C",""",rc..Ulnduolrlal (CI... 3a -1995: 4.6% of €MV}wiU decrease -ll.90% I 1996: 46% of EMV {6}Note: In mosl CaMS theM reduced commereitlllinduWiaJ tatas apply to en. pureel per owner pol( county. I TllX ~ on Apartmont (4 or more unit!.) prnpenJea aelumng I lhallhe ........ value I. the Mme from PDyabl8 199510 Payable 1996. Apart..,."to (Clo.. 40) 1995: 3.4'1lo 01 EMV --- 1996: 3.4% of EMV - ., Ajlartmen( property I.,... ...1 decflit-alile -3.14'1lo Prepared by: Ramsey County, Dspartmttnt of Pfoptlrty Recof'as & Revenue Date run: 11 J2O,95 I local Government Olvl6ion .. Tax Accounting Section (Ie) "l.nI\.96xlmplltwll:4 I ---- -- 1.-~0-95 0;:: ?~ t" i_; U~: Comparison of tax.. I,,: ARDEN HILLS .JiU1!ll T8l< comporioon on flvu (5) """"0<1 __ ~..d propol1i.. ..sum... , that thtI """"01 ....Iy. 1nct'ua.. 2.08% from Payable 199510 P'l"'bl.199f.. - Estimated \(, P~ 1995 Payabla 1996 lner. LooolTox Rat. locai Tax Rat. (00<<.) 141.517% 141.649% 0.09% Hometloed(Cla..lo) 1995: 1% of 111 12.000 EMV: 2'lfo 01_ 1996: 1%0(1.112,000 EMV: 2% ~axe... Est. EII'-ed 1995 1996 % MorI<el Tex No< Tax Net lnet, lnor. Ve.lue Copociy Tax Capacity rox (Oect.) (Deer.) ._.. $50,000 $500 $708 $510 $722 $14 1.98% ~- 72.000 no 1.019 750 1.062 43 4.22% ~ 100.000 1,280 '.811 1.322 1,B73 62 3.42% - '15,000 '.580 2,236 1.629 2,306 70 3.13% . 150,000 2.280 3,227 2,342 3.317 90 2.79% - - Tax c:cmperison on selected Commarcialllnduttrlal properties assuming ,. mat the meriui'l "'iIlue is IN lame from Payabl. 1995 to Pey.eblfi 1996. C","""","alllndo.mn.i (Cia.. 3A) 1995: 3,0% of 111100,000 ew: 4.6% 0/ OllCe"I"j 1996: 3.0% of 1.. 100,000 ew: 4.6% of'lCOOSa I Ell. Estimated 1995 '998 % Markl!d Tax Net Tax Not lner. lner. Value C""ocity Tax Ca~v Tax (Dect.l (OectJ . $100.000 $3,000 $4,182 $3,000 $4.248 $66 1.58% 500,000 21,400 29,831 2',400 30,300 469 , .57'1. . 1,000.000 44,400 6',892 44,400 62,966 974 1.57% Commeroj.lIlndy.lrial (Cl... 3e .1995: 4.6% of EMV) will incr.IiI" 1.57% . 1995: 4.6% of EMV r)Not@: '" I"r'I06t c.e... these reduced CQl'T1merciaiflndustrlal retell i1PP(y to one parc:eJ :. "'" owner per county. T I!IX comparison on Apartment (4 or mar. units) properues anumin; II _the ,""",lit vakJo Ia the same from PayabM 199500 Payable 1996. Apartment. (Cia.. 4a) 1995: 3.4% of EMV I I 1996: 3,4% of EMV .: A.paitrnenf property tax.. 1M11 incr8BS8 O.ll9'li> Prepllr6d by: Ramsey County, Deportmenl of Prnpef1y Record. & RllVOfllJO Datil run: '1120195 Local Government Division - Tax kCOUlllM-lg SACtion ($e) \tnt'li&lomptltwll:41 I . Ramsey County PROPOSED Local Tax Rates forTaxes Payable In 1996 . . (4) (5) .ICIPALlTY & SCH. CITY OR (1) (2) S.I.S.D. (3) TOTAL LOCAL MARKET DIST &W/S TOWN COUNTY SCHOOLS # 916 MISC TAX RATE RATE ------------------- ---- ---- ------- ------- ------- ---- ------ ----------------- ------------------- ---- ------- ------- ------- ------ ----------------- ARDEN HILLS 621 (R) 17.145% 44.266% 61.414% 0.375% 5.021% 128.221% - ARDEN HILLS 623 (R) 17.145% 44.266% 74.842% 0.375% 5.021% 141.649% - BLAINE 621 (R) 18.186% 44.266% 61.414% 0.375% 5.889% 130.130% - FAIRGROUNDS 623 (S) 0.000% 44.266% 74.842% 0.375% 4.576% 124.059% - FAIRGROUNDS 625 (S) 0.000% 44.266% 69.801% 4.576% 118.643% - FALCON HEIGHTS 623 (C) 15.883% 44.266% 74.842% 0.375% 4.576% 139.942% - FALCON HEIGHTS 623 (I) 15.883% 44.266% 74.842% 0.375% 4.576% 139.942% - FALCON HEIGHTS 623 (R) 15.883% 44.266% 74.842% 0.375% 5.021% 140.387% - FALCON HEIGHTS 623 (S) 15.883% 44.266% 74.842% 0.375% 4.576% 139.942% - GEM LAKE 624 14.612% 44.266% 62.751% 0.375% 3.811% 125.815% - - GEM LAKE 624 (M)(NB) 14.612% 44.508% 62.751% 0.375% 6.015% 128.261% - LAUDERDALE 623 (I) 25.691% 44.266% 74.842% 0.375% 4.576% 149.750% - - LAUDERDALE 623 (R) 25.691% 44.266% 74.842% 0.375% 5.021% 150.195% - _ UTTLE CANADA 623 (M)(NB) 20.661% 44.508% 74.842% 0.375% 6.780% 147.166% - UTTLE CANADA 624 (M)(NB) 20.661% 44.508% 62.751% 0.375% 6.780% 135.075% - MAPLEWOOD 622 (M)(BC) 20.860% 44.266% 57.530% 0.375% 4.953% 127.984% 0.027% MAPLEWOOD 622 (M)(NB) 20.860% 44.508% 57.530% 0.375% 6.780% 130.053% 0.027% ~ MAPLEWOOD 622 (V) 20.860% 45.799% 57.530% 0.375% 8.079% 132.643% 0.027% MAPLEWOOD 623 20.860% 44.266% 74.842% 0.375% 4.576% 144.919% 0.027% MAPLEWOOD 623 (C) 20.860% 44.266% 74.842% 0.375% 4.576% 144.919% 0.027% IILEWOOD 623 (M)(NB) 20.860% 44.508% 74.842% 0.375% 6.780% 147.365% 0.027% LEWOOD 624 (M)(NB) 20.860% 44.508% 62.751% 0.375% 6.780% 135.274% 0.027% UNDS VIEW 621 (R) 26.615% 44.266% 61.414% 0.375% 5.639% 138.309% - I NEW BRIGHTON 282 (R) 18.343% 44.266% 76.033% 5.021% 143.663% - NEW BRIGHTON 621 (R) 18.343% 44.266% 61.414% 0.375% 5.021% 129.419% - NEW BRIGHTON 621 (R){D) 18.343% 44.266% 61.414% 0.375% 5.021% 129.419% - I NORTH OAKS 621 8.199% 44.266% 61.414% 0.375% 4.576% 118.830% - NORTH OAKS 624 8.199% 44.266% 62.751% 0.375% 4.576% 120.167% - NORTH ST. PAUL 622 (M)(NB) 15.276% 44.508% 57.530% 0.375% 6.780% 124.469% - I NORTH ST. PAUL 622 (V) 15.276% 45.799% 57.530% 0.375% 8.079% 127.059% - ROSEVILLE 621 17.076% 44.266% 61.414% 0.375% 4.576% 127.707% - ROSEVILLE 621 (R) 17 .076% 44.266% 61.414% 0.375% 5.021% 128.152% - I ROSEVILLE 623 17.076% 44.266% 74.842% 0.375% 4.576% 141.135% - ROSEVILLE 623 (C) 17.076% 44.266% 74.842% 0.375% 4.576% 141.135% - ROSEVILLE 623 (R) 17.076% 44.266% 74.842% 0.375% 5.021% 141.580% - I ST. ANTHONY 282 (R) 28.055% 44.266% 76.033% 5.283% 153.637% - ST. PAUL (6) 625 (C) 37.813% 40.520% 69.361% 5.522% 153.216% - ST. PAUL (6) 625 (I) 37.813% 40.520% 69.361% 5.522% 153.216% - I ST. PAUL (6) 625 (L) 37.813% 40.520% 69.361% 5.522% 153.216% - ST. PAUL (6) 625 (M)(BC) 37.813% 40.507% 69.349% 5.899% 153.568% - ST. PAUL (6) 625 (M)(NB) 37.813% 40.754% 69.361% 7.726% 155.654% - I ST. PAUL (6) 625 (S) 37.813% 40.520% 69.361% 5.522% 153.216% - SHOREVIEW 621 (G) 19.753% 44.266% 61.414% 0.375% 4.576% 130.384% - IREVIEW 621 (R) 19.753% 44.266% 61.414% 0.375% 5.021% 130.829% - REVIEW 623 (G) 19.753% 44.266% 74.842% 0.375% 4.576% 143.812% - Is OREVIEW 623 (R) 19.753% 44.266% 74.842% 0.375% 5.021% 144.257% - SPRING LAKE PARK 621 (R) 24.424% 44.266% 61.414% 0.375% 5.639% 136.118% - IVADNAIS HEIGHTS 621 15.501% 44.266% 61.414% 0.375% 4.576% 126.132% - VADNAIS HEIGHTS 624 15.501% 44.266% 62.751 % 0.375% 4.576% 127.469% - VADNAIS HEIGHTS--624 (M)(NB) 15.501% 44.508% 62.751% 0.375% 6.780% 129.915% - Ramsey County PROPOSED Local Tax Rates fotTaxes Payable In 1996 < , (4) (5) SCH. CITY OR (1) (2) S.I.S.D. (3) TOTAL LOCAL MARKET MUNICIPALITY & DIST &W/S TOWN COUNTY SCHOOLS # 916 MISC TAX RATE RATE. ------------------- ---- ---- ------- ------- ------- ---- ====== ================= ------------------- ---- ------- ------- ------- WHITE BEAR LAKE 622 M 16.251% 45.799% 57.530% 0.375% 8.079% 128.034% - WHITE BEAR LAKE 624 16.251% 44.266% 62.751% 0.375% 4.576% 128.219% - WHITE BEAR LAKE 624 (M)(NB) 16.251% 44.508% 62.751% 0.375% 6.780% 130.665% - WHITE BEAR LAKE 624 (R) 16.251% 44.266% 62.751% 0.375% 5.021% 128.664% - WHITE BEAR LAKE 624 M 16.251% 45.799% 62.751% 0.375% 8.079% 133.255% - TOWN OF WHITE BEAR 621 (R) 16.299% 44.266% 61.414% 0.375% 4.256% 126.610% - TOWN OF"WHITE BEAR 624 16.299% 44.266% 62.751% 0.375% 3.811% 127.502% - TOWN OF WHITE BEAR 624 (M)(NB) 16.299% 44.508% 62.751% 0.375% 6.015% 129.948% - TOWN OF WHITE BEAR 624 (R) 16.299% 44.266% 62.751% 0.375% 4.256% 127.947% - (1) See County Rate summary for rate components (2) Does not include .375% for Special Intermediate School District #916 (3) See Miscellaneous Rate summary for rate components (4) Local tax rates apply to tax capacity (5) Market rates apply to taxable market value - (6) Rates in the City of SI. Paul are reduced for Disparity Reduction Aid (C) Refers to Central Ramsey Water Management Org. (Joint Powers) (D) Refers to Lake Diane Storm Sewer District - (G) Refers to Grass Lake .Water Management Org. (Joint Powers) ~ (I) Refers to Middle Mississippi Water Management Org. (Joint Powers) (l) Refers to Lower Mississippi Water Management Org. (Joint Powers) _I (M) Refers to Metro Watershed District (Ramsey-Washington) (R) Refers to Rice Creek Watershed District (S) Refers to Southwest Ramsey Water Management Org. (Joint Powers) I M Refers to Valley Branch Watershed District (BC) Refers to Battle Creek Project a Sub-Watershed of the Metro Watershed (NB) Refers to that portion of the Metro Watershed that is not part of the I Battle Creek Project TAX COMPUTATION I Example of tax computation for 1995 on a HOMESTEAD PROPERTY in I SI. Paul- 625 (C), that has an Estimated Market Value of $120,000: Tax Capacity is determined as follows: I 1.00% x first $72,000 of Estimated Market Value $720 2.00% x Estimated Market Value in excess of $72,000 ~ I Net Tax Capacity $1,680 I The net tax capacity is the amount to which the local tax rate is applied. Net Tax Payable = 153.216% multiplied by $1,680 = $2,574.04 -. .__.~ . , Ramsey County PROPOSED Local Tax Rates forTaxes Payable in 1996 . COUNTY RATES MISCELLANEOUS RATES (CONTINUED) _sey County Metropolitan Council plies to St. Paul 625 (MBC) 40.507% Applies to all municipalities 0.725% Applies to St. Paul 625 (MNB) 40.512% Applies to all other St. Paul 40.520% Regional Transit Commission 3.606% Applies to all other cities 40.867% Applies to all municipalities except: - Gem Lake 2.841% County Library 3.399% Town of White Bear 2.841% Applies to all cities except St. Paul Mosquito Control Metro W/S Capital Improvement due County Applies to all municipalities 0.245% Applies where designated by (MNB). 0.242% Light Rail Authority - Valley Branch Watershed Dist. County Debt Applies to all municipalities 0.000% Applies where designated by M. 1.533% - - .J - MISCELLANEOUS RATES FISCAL DiSPARITY SHARING FACTORS St. Paul Housing Authority Arden Hills 0.282168 - Applies to all St. Paul 0.464% Blaine 0.360277 I_au, Port Authority Fairgrounds 0.300478 Falcon Heights 0.091739 plies to all St. Paul 0.482% Gem Lake 0.308616 I North Suburban Hospital District Lauderdale 0.121880 0.618% Little Canada 0.364730 Applies to Blaine, Mounds View Maplewood 0.304325 I and Spring Lake Park Mounds View 0.335138 New Brighton 0.305813 St. Anthony Housing Authority 0.262% North Oaks 0.277746 I Applies only to City of St. Anthony North St. Paul 0.296307 Roseville 0.254242 Blaine Housing Authority 0.250% SI. Anthony 0.112385 I Applies only to City of Blaine SI. Paul 0.190379 Shoreview 0.366349 Metro Watershed District (Ramsey-Wash.) Spring Lake Park 0.198850 I Applies where designated by: Vadnais Heights 0.354874 MBC 0.377% White Bear Lake 0.317823 MNB 2.204% Town of White Bear 0.346442 I Rice Creek Watershed District 0.445% FD (Fiscal Disparity) rate. . . 141.441% Applies where designated by (R). The appropriate FD sharing factor times I Valley Branch Watershed District the tax capacity of real or personal property classified commercial or _lies where designated by (V). industrial bears this rate. I Revenue 3.503% Lake Diane Storm Sewer District --...- . I Applies where designated by (D) 0.000% Tax Increment District Sharing Factors for PROPOSED Taxes Payable In 1996 , . TIF TIF TIF District No. Eact.oI District No. Eact.oI District No. 0=7e #11 Energy Park 0.854790 #91 Maplewood 0.664006 #3E New Brighton #12 Blighted District 0.795065 #92 Moundsview 0.987204 #4E White Bear Town 0.955708 #21 New Brighton 0.000000 #93 Vadnais Heights 0.692024 #5E White Bear Town 0.973250 #22 New Brighton 0.000000 #94 Vadnais Heights 0.859910 #6E Little Canada 0.918502 #23 New Brighton 0.874341 #95 New Brighton 0.905611 #7E Little Canada 0.810401 #24 Blk 40 7th PI Expansion 0.482484 #96 New Brighton 0.856721 #8E Vadnais Heights 0.703848 - #26 Roseville 0.658858 #97 lillie Canada 0.886526 #9E SnellUniv Hazard 0.998842 #27 Rosevllle 0.702589 #98 White Bear Lake 0.817830 #1 F White Bear Lake 0.932232 #29 New Brighton 0.000000 #99 Maplewood 0.989279 #2F Vadnais Heights 0.546828 - #41 New Brighton 0.897876 #lA Neighborhood 0.017420 #3F White Bear Lake 0.878271 #42 Falcon Heights 0.794146 #2A Shoreview 0.682591 #4F Empire Builder 0.017420 #43 Roseville 0.966751 #3A Vadnais Heights 0.961185 #5F Vadnais Heights 0.258378 #50 Vadnais Heights 0.987577 #4A Litlle Canada 0.798752 #6F Vadnais Heights 0.970878 - #51 Falcon Heights 0.884166 #5A New Brighton 0.000000 #7F White Bear Town 1.189079 #52 New Brighton 0.833205 #6A Roseville 0.477335 #9F White Bear Lake 0.348195 #53 New Brighton 0.976357 #7 A White Bear Lake 0.947059 #2G Little Canada 0.938224 - #54 Vadnais Heights 0.987071 #8A White Bear Lake 0.989260 #3G White Bear Lake 0.254861 - #57 Lauderdale 0.890743 #1 B Vadnais Heights 0.882106 #4G Vadnais Heights 0.235089 #58 SI. Anthony 0.828255 #2B Vadnais Heights 0.942492 #5G New Brighton 0.648988 - #61 North SI. Paul 0.981027 #3B Vadnais Heights 0.979043 #6G White Bear Lake 0.896054 - #62 New Brighton 0.904414 #4B Vadnais Heights 0.000000 #7G New Brighton 0.929129 #64 Rosevllle 0.325461 #5B New Brighton 0.764859 #8G New Brighton 0.000000 . I #65 New Brighton 0.990078 #6B White Bear Lake 0.000000 #9G SI. Anthony 0.000000 _ #66 New Brighton 0.968309 #7B White Bear Lake 0.845025 #1 H SI. Anthony 0.859503 #67 White Bear Lake 0.905552 #8B White Bear Lake 0.957690 #2H Arden Hills 0.932152 I #69 Maplewood 0.996655 #9B Maplewood 0.556172 #3H White Bear Lake 0.919333 #70 Maplewood 0.974671 #1 C Shoreview 0.790621 #4H White Bear Lake 0.720885 #71 White Bear Lake 0.885196 #2C Vadnais Heights 0.000000 #5H White Bear Town 0.418750 I #72 Roseville 0.024309 #3C Arden Hills 0.931716 #6H Roseville 0.878749 #73 Vadnais Heights 0.993253 #4C Arden Hills 0.000000 #7H White Bear Lake 0.762714 #74 White Bear Lake 0.959354 #5C White Bear Lake 0.907807 #8H White Bear Lake 0.614764 I #75 Moundsview 0.827789 #6C White Bear Lake 0.960364 #9H Maplewood 0.967541 #76 Roseville 0.929789 #7C SI. Anthony 0.986793 #lJ Maplewood 0.970270 #77 Roseville 0.475064 #8C SI. Paul 0.447445 #2J SI. Paul 0.795065 . #78 Roseville 0.670010 #9C Little Canada 0.514570 #3J Shoreview 0.096356 #79 New Brighton 0.910088 #10 White Bear Town 0.996688 #4J New Brighton 0.106012 #80 New Brighton 0.985850 #2D White Bear Town 0.997415 #5J lillie Canada 0.000000 . #82 Seventh Place 0.482484 #3D White Bear Town 0.997880 #6J New Brighton 0.758625 #83 Spruce Tree/Melz 0.785393 #40 Vadnais Heights 0.113794 #7J White Bear Town 0.933999 #84 White Bear Lake 0.988431 #50 North SI. Paul 0.860513 #8J Roseville 0.000000 . #85 Vadnais Heights 0.833368 #6D North SI. Paul 0.589228 #9J Vadnais Heights 0.765923 #86 Roseville 0.311699 #70 Roseville 0.000000 #1 K New Brighton 0.000000 #87 Riverfront 0.537535 #80 Roseville 0.000000 #2K North SI. Paul 0.171638 . #88 New Brighton 0.719573 #9D Snelling/Univ 0.998842 #3K Vadnais Heights 0.011850 #89 Westgate 0.779281 #1 E White Bear Lake 0.000000 #5K White Bear Lake 0.000000 e. #90 Moundsview 0.192191 #2E White Bear Lake 0.000000 Ou_ . Prepared by:RAMSEY COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY RECORDS & REVENUE, Lou McKenna, Director . Suite #830, Ramsey County Govemment Center West, SI. Paul, Minnesota 55102 , FINAl LOCAl TAX RATES FOR TAXES PAYABLE IN 1995 (4) (5) SCH. CITY OR (1) (2) (3) TOTAL LOCAL MARKET . MUNICIPALITY & DIST & WIS TOWN COUNTY SCHOOLS Mise TAX RATE RATE =================== ==== ======= ======= ------- ------- ------ ---------- ------- ------- ------- ------ ---------- ------- ARDEN HILLS 621 (R) 17.480% 44.692% 65.036% 5.175% 132.383% - ARDEN HILLS 623 (R) 17.480% 44.692% 74.170% 5.175% 141.517% - BLAINE 621 (R) 18.406% 44.692% 65.036% 6.076% 134.210% -- FAIRGROUNDS 623 (S) 0.000% 44.692% 74.170% 4.699% 123.561% - FAIRGROUNDS 625 (S) 0.000% 44.692% 66.678% 4.699% 116.069% -- FALCON HEIGHTS 623 (C) 16.485% 44.692% 74.170% 4.699% 140.046% - FALCON HEIGHTS 623 (I) 16.485% 44.692% 74.170% 4.699% 140.046% - FALCON HEIGHTS 623 (R) 16.485% 44.692% 74.170% 5.175% 140.522% - FALCON HEIGHTS 623 (S) 16.485% 44.692% 74.170% 4.699% 140.046% - GEM LAKE 624 14.696% 44,692% 72.686% 3.934% 136.008% - GEM LAKE 624 (M)(NB) 14.696% 45.371% 72.686% 6.063% 138.816% - LAUDERDALE 623 (I) 26.359% 44.692% 74.170% 4.699% 149.920% -- LAUDERDALE 623 (R) 26.359% 44.692% 74.170% 5.175% 150.396% - LITTLE CANADA 623 (M)(NB) 20.348% 45.371% 74.170% 6.828% 146.717% - LITTLE CANADA 624 (M)(NB) 20.348% 45.371% 72.686% 6.828% 145.233% - MAPLEWOOD 622 (M)(BC) 21.560% 44.692% 75.219% 4.975% 146.446% 0.031% MAPLEWOOD 622 (M)(NB) 21.560% 45.371% 75.219% 6.828% 148.978% 0.031% MAPLEWOOD 622 M 21.560% 46.248% 75.219% 6.040% 149.067% 0.031% MAPLEWOOD 623 21.560% 44.692% 74.170% 4.699% 145.121% 0.031% MAPLEWOOD 623 (C) 21.560% 44.692% 74.170% 4.699% 145.121% 0.031% MAPLEWOOD 623 (M)(NB) 21.560% 45.371% 74.170% 6.828% 147.929% 0.031% - MAPLEWOOD 624 (M)(NB) 21.560% 45.371% 72.686% 6.828% 146.445% 0.031% ~OUNDS VIEW 621 (R) 26.029% 44.692% 65.036% 5.814% 141.571% - - NEW BRIGHTON 282 (R) 17.602% 44.692% 65.790% 5.175% 133.259% - I NEW BRIGHTON 621 (R) 17.602% 44.692% 65.036% 5.175% 132.505% - NEW BRIGHTON 621 (R)(D) 20.883% 44.692% 65.036% 5.175% 135.786% - NORTH OAKS 621 9.082% 44.692% 65.036% 4.699% 123.509% - I NORTH OAKS 624 9.082% 44.692% 72.686% 4.699% 131.159% - NORTH ST. PAUL 622 (M)(NB) 15.280% 45.371% 75.219% 6.828% 142.698% - NORTH ST. PAUL 622 M 15.280% 46.248% 75.219% 6.040% 142.787% - ROSEVILLE 621 18.000% 44.692% 65.036% 4.699% 132.427% - I ROSEVILLE 621 (R) 18.000% 44.692% 65.036% 5.175% 132.903% - ROSEVILLE 623 18.000% 44.692% 74.170% 4.699% 141.561% - ROSEVILLE 623 (C) 18.000% 44.692% 74.170% 4.699% 141.561% - I ROSEVILLE 623 (R) 18.000% 44.692% 74.170% 5.175% 142.037% - ST. ANTHONY 282 (R) 25.769% 44.692% 65.790% 5.437% 141.688% - ST. PAUL (6) 625 (C) 39.301% 40.875% 66.234% 5.616% 152.026% - I ST. PAUL (6) 625 (I) 39.301% 40.875% 66.234% 5.616% 152.026% - ST. PAUL (6) 625 (L) 39.301% 40.875% 66.234% 5.616% 152.026% - ST. PAUL (6) 625 (M)(BC) 39.301% 40.862% 66.223% 5.892% 152.278% - I ST. PAUL (6) 625 (M)(NB) 39.301% 41.545% 66.234% 7.745% 154.825% - ST. PAUL (6) 625 (S) 39.301% 40.875% 66.234% 5.616% 152.026% -- SHOREVIEW 621 (G) 19.330% 44.692% 65.036% 4.699% 133.757% - I SHOREVIEW 621 (R) 19.330% 44.692% 65.036% 5.175% 134.233% -- SHOREVIEW 623 (G) 19.330% 44.692% 74.170% 4.699% 142.891% - .HOREVIEW 623 (R) 19.330% 44.692% 74.170% 5.175% 143.367% - I PRING LAKE PARK 621 (R) 23.995% 44.692% 65.036% 5.814% 139.537% -- VADNAIS HEIGHTS 621 15.052% 44.692% 65.036% 4.699% 129.479% - VADNAIS HEIGHTS 624 15.052% 44.692% 72.686% 4.699% 137.129% -- I VADNAIS HEIGHTS 624 (M)(NB) 15.052% 45.371% 72.686% 6.828% 139.937% -- FINAL LOCAL TAX RATES FOR TAXES PAYABLE IN 1995 (4) (5_ SCH. CITY OR (1) (2) (3) TOTAL LOCAL MAR MUNICIPALITY & DIST &W/S TOWN COUNTY SCHOOLS MISC TAX RATE RAT ------------------- ---- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------ ---------- ------- ------------------- ---- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------ ---------- ------- WHITE BEAR LAKE 622 M 16.827% 46.248% 75.219% 6.040% 144.334% -- WHITE BEAR LAKE 624 16.827% 44.692% 72.686% 4.699% 138.904% -- WHITE BEAR LAKE 624 (M)(N B) 16.827% 45.371% 72.686% 6.828% 141.712% -- WHITE BEAR LAKE 624 (R) 16.827% 44.692% 72.686% 5.175% 139.380% - WHITE BEAR LAKE 624 M 16.827% 46.248% 72.686% 6.040% 141.801% -- TOWN OF WHITE BEAR 621 (R) 13.553% 44.692% 65.036% 4.410% 127.691% - TOWN OF WHITE BEAR 624 13.553% 44.692% 72.686% 3.934% 134.865% -- TOWN OF WHITE BEAR 624 (M)(NB) 13.553% 45.371% 72.686% 6.063% 137.673% - TOWN OF WHITE BEAR 624 (R) 13.553% 44.692% 72.686% 4.410% 135.341% - (1) See County Rate summary for rate components (2) Includes .372% for Special Intermediate School District #916 Does not apply in School District 282 and School District 625 (3) See Miscellaneous Rate summary for rate components (4) Local tax rates apply to tax capacity (5) Market rates apply to taxable market value (6) Rates in the City of SI. Paul are reduced for Disparity Reduction Aid (C) Refers to Central Ramsey Water Management Org. (Joint Powers) - (D) Refers to Lake Diane Storm Sewer District (G) Refers to Grass Lake Water Management Org. (Joint Powers) - (I) Refers to Middle Mississippi Water Management Org. (Joint Powers) e- (l) Refers to Lower Mississippi Water Management Org. (Joint Powers) (M) Refers to Metro Watershed District (Ramsey-Washington) I (R) Refers to Rice Creek Watershed District (S) Refers to Southwest Ramsey Water Management Org. (Joint Powers) M Refers to Valley Branch Watershed District I (BC) Refers to Battle Creek Project a Sub-Watershed of the Metro Watershed (NB) Refers to that portion of the Metro Watershed that is not part of the Battle Creek Project I TAX COMPUTATION Example of tax computation for 1995 on a HOMESTEAD PROPERTY in I SI. Paul- 625 (C), that has an Estimated Market Value of $120,000: Tax Capacity is determined as follows: I 1.00% x first $72,000 of Estimated Market Value $720 2.00% x Estimated Market Value in excess of $72,000 960 I - Net Tax Capacity $1,680 I - The net tax capacity is the amount to which the local tax rate is applied. -. Net Tax Payable = 1.52026 multiplied by $1,680 = $2,554.05 -- I , . FINAL LOCAL TAX RATES FOR TAXES PAYABLE IN 1995 ~ - COUNTY RATES MISCELLANEOUS RATES (CONTINUED) e Ramsey County Metropolnan Council Applies to 51. Paul 625 (MBC) 40.862% Applies to all municipalities 0.503% Applies to SI. Paul 625 (MNB) 40.866% Applies to all other SI. Paul 40.875% Regional Transn Commission 3.758% Applies to all other cities 41.224% Applies to all municipalities except: - Gem Lake 2.993% County Library 3.468% Town ofWMe Bear 2.993% Applies to all cities except St. Paul Mosquno Control Metro W/S Capital Improvement due County Applies to all municipalities 0.358% Applies where designated by (MNB). 0.679% Light Rail Authority Valley Branch Watershed Dist. County Debt Applies to all muniCipalities 0.080% Applies where designated by M. 1.556% MISCELLANEOUS RATES FISCAL DISPARITY SHARING FACTORS - SI. Paul Housing Authority Arden Hills 0.315549 - Applies to all St. Paul 0.478% Blaine 0.398512 Fairgrounds 0.000000 1_ St. Paul Port Authority Falcon Heights 0.329700 Applies to all St. Paul 0.439% Gem Lake 0.304261 Lauderdale 0.131445 I North Suburban Hospital District 0.639% Little Canada 0.362021 Applies to Blaine, Mounds View Maplewood 0.299215 and Spring Lake Park. Mounds View 0.357269 I New Brighton 0.310340 51. Anthony Housing Authority 0.262% North Oaks 0.316697 Applies only to City of St. Anthony North SI. Paul 0.302380 I Roseville 0.304217 Blaine Housing Authority 0.262% SI. Anthony 0.064409 Applies only to City of Blaine SI. Paul 0.194932 I Shoreview 0.367336 Metro Watershed District (Ramsey-Wash.) Spring Lake Park 0.200259 Applies where designated by: Vadnais Heights 0.380488 I MBC 0.276% Whne Bear Lake 0.294588 MNB 2.129% Town of WMe Bear 0.298632 I Rice Creek Watershed District 0.476% FD (Fiscal Disparity) rate. . . 134.799% Applies where designated by (R). The appropriate FD sharing factor times the tax capacity of real or personal I Valley Branch Watershed District property classified commercial or Applies where designated by (V). industrial bears this rate. e . Revenue 1.341% I Lake Diane Storm Sewer District Applies where designated by (D) 3.281% +..- . I , TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT SHARING FACTORS FOR TAXES PAYABLE IN 1995 ~ , ~ District No Em2r District No EM1Qr District No Em2r #11 Energy Park 0.865956 #87 Riverfront 0.530193 #80 Roseville O.OOOt #12 Blighted District 0.790770 #88 New Brighton 0.719573 #90 Snelling/Univ 0.998 #21 New Brighton 0.000000 #89 Westgate 0.741272 #1E White Bear Lake 0.00000 #22 New Brighton 0.000000 #90 Moundsview 0.184741 #2E White Bear Lake 0.000000 #23 New Brighton 0.874341 #91 Maplewood 0.668882 #3E New Brighton 0.553257 #24 Blk 40 7th Pic Expans 0.511180 #92 Moundsview 0.987160 #4E White Bear Town 0.958643 #26 Roseville 0.625772 #93 Vadnais Heights 0.671443 #5E White Bear Town 0.978789 - #27 Roseville 0.655507 #94 Vadnais Heights 0.865853 #6E Little Canada 0.925706 #29 New Brighton 0.000000 #95 New Brighton 0.905611 #7E Little Canada 0.810079 #41 New Brighton 0.897876 #96 New Brighton 0.823462 #8E Vadnais Heights 0.703848 #42 Falcon Heights 0.794146 #97 Little Canada 0.889781 #9E SnellUniv Hazard 0.998805 #43 Roseville 0.965198 #98 White Bear Lake 0.818219 #1 F White Bear Lake 0.932232 #50 Vadnais Heights 0.987577 #99 Maplewood 0.989155 #2F Vadnais Heights 0.546828 #51 Falcon Heights 0.884645 #1A Neighborhood 0.031714 #3F White Bear Lake 0.878271 #52 New Brighton 0.828390 #2A Shoreview 0.682327 #4F Empire Builder 0.031714 #53 New Brighton 0.976357 #3A Vadnais Heights 0.960403 #5F Vadnais Heights 0.284986 #54 Vadnais Heights 0.987035 #4A Little Canada 0.834793 #6F Vadnais Heights 0.963482 #56 Vadnais Heights 0.672667 #5A New Brighton 0.000000 #7F White Bear Town 0.988543 #57 Lauderdale 0.889732 #6A Roseville 0.449462 #8F White Bear Lake 0.940208 #58 SI. Anthony 0.828255 #7 A White Bear Lake 0.947059 #9F White Bear Lake 0.348195 - #59 Falcon Heights 0.000000 #8A White Bear Lake 0.989260 #2G Little Canada 0.938233 - #61 North SI. Paul 0.981027 #1 B Vadnais Heights 0.902661 #3G White Bear Lake 0.254861 #62 New Brighton 0.903493 #2B Vadnais Heights 0.938830 #4G Vadnais Heights 0.2350jt . #63 Vadnais Heights 0.990505 #3B Vadnais Heights 0.979113 #5G New Brighton 0.5024 . #64 Roseville 0.306317 #4B Vadnais Heights 0.000000 #6G White Bear Lake 0.84305 #65 New Brighton 0.990078 #5B New Brighton 0.764859 #7G New Brighton 0.887097 I #66 New Brighton 0.968309 #6B White Bear Lake 0.000000 #8G New Brighton 0.000000 #67 White Bear Lake 0.905552 #7B White Bear Lake 0.845025 #9G SI. Anthony 0.000000 #68 Maplewood 0.494705 #8B White Bear Lake 0.967202 #1 H SI. Anthony 0.730666 I #69 Maplewood 0.996655 #9B Maplewood 0.544726 #2H Arden Hills 0.002274 #70 Maplewood 0.974671 #1 C Shoreview 0.749784 #3H White Bear Lake 0.919333 #71 White Bear Lake 0.908516 #2C Vadnais Heights 0.000000 #4H White Bear Lake 0.000000 I #72 Roseville 0.011201 #3C Arden Hills 0.934749 #5H White BearTown 0.034334 #73 Vadnais Heights 0.993431 #4C Arden Hills 0.000000 #6H Roseville 0.164535 #74 White Bear Lake 0.942439 #5C White Bear Lake 0.912412 #7H White Bear Lake 0.000000 I #75 Moundsview 0.812731 #6C White Bear Lake 0.970964 #8H White Bear Lake 0.021467 #76 Roseville 0.929279 #7C SI. Anthony 0.985893 #9H Maplewood 0.957062 I #77 Roseville 0.443229 #8C SI. Paul 0.449608 #lJ Maplewood 0.826698 #78 Roseville 0.625449 #9C Little Canada 0.556252 #2J SI. Paul 0.790770 #79 New Brighton 0.910088 #10 White Bear Town 0.996688 #3J Shoreview 0.000000 I #80 New Brighton 0.985850 #20 White Bear Town 0.997415 #4J New Brighton 0.064807 #82 Seventh Place 0.495185 #30 White Bear Town 0.997962 #5J Little Canada 0.000000 #83 Spruce TreelMetz 0.846501 #40 Vadnais Heights 0.203847 #6J New Brighton 0.000000 I #84 White Bear Lake 0.989049 #50 North SI. Paul 0.843838 #7J White Bear Town 0.115543 #85 Vadnais Heights 0.833368 #60 North SI. Paul 0.589228 #8J Roseville 0.00000. #86 Roseville 0.290808 #70 Roseville 0.000000 #9J Vadnais Heights 0.00000 I --- Prepared by: DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY RECORDS & REVENUE, Lou McKenna, Director I Suite 830. Ramsey County Government Center West, SI. Paul, Minnesota 55102