HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 04-26-2004
.
~
~~HILLS
Approved: May 10, 2004
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
APRIL 26, 2004, 7:00 P.M.
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 1245 WEST HIGHWAY 96
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Beverly Aplikowski called to order the
Regular City Council Meeting at 7:02 p.m.
Present:
Mayor Beverly Aplikowski, Councilmembers David Grant, Gregg Larson,
Lois Rem, and Brenda Holden.
Absent:
None.
.
Also present were City Administrator, Michelle Wolfe; City Attorney, Jeny Filla;
Assistant City Administrator, Aaron Parrish; Director of Operations & Maintenance,
Thomas Moore; Finance Director/Treasurer, Murtuza Siddiqui; City Engineers, Greg
Brown and Nick Landwer; and Recording Secretary, Kathleen Altman,
1.
APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA
Ms. Wolfe requested item 3F be pulled from the Consent Calendar and added as item 7 A.
MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Grant seconded a
motion to approve the meeting agenda as amended. The motion carried
unanimously (5-0).
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. April 12, 2004 City Council Meeting
Councilmember Holden requested the following changes: None.
Councilmember Grant requested the following changes: None.
Couucilmember Rem requested the following changes: None.
. Councilmember Larson requested the following changes: Page 2, last paragraph, should read
",..as a whole and has found...", Page 3, second to the last paragraph, should read
"Councilmember Larson asked if the City was recovering its costs.. .". Page 4, second to the last
\ \Earth \Admin \CouncillMinuleslRegular\2004 \04-26-04 ,doc
ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
APRIL 26, 2004
2
.
paragraph, should read "Councilmember Larson stated the PTRC might also want to get involved
with any rerouting of the trail proposal." Page 5, third paragraph, should read "Councilmember
Larson - Stated he agreed with the stenciling of the curbs to inform people that they could
possibly be contributing contaminants to specific water bodies."
Mayor Aplikowski requested the following changes: None.
Ms. Wolfe requested the following changes: None.
MOTION: Councilmember Grant moved and Councilmember Larson seconded a
motion to approve the April 12, 2004 City Council Meeting Minutes as
amended. The motion carried unanimously (5-0),
3. CONSENT CALENDAR
a,
b,
c.
d.
e.
. f.
g.
h.
I.
Claims and Payroll
Authorize Summer Hours
Approve Public Expenditure Policy
Authorize Study of Pedestrian Improvements to the Old 10 Rail Bridge
Authorize Position Description, Salary, and Recruitment for an Assistant to the City
Administrator
Authorize lI:Hj3lcmentatiofl of Credit Card TransactioHs at City Hall (Moved to 7 A),
Approve Purchase of Felling Trailers
Authorize Purchase and Installation of Maintenance Facility Fiber
Approve Resolution 04-37 Designating Polling Places for the 2004 Elections
MOTION: Councilmember Larson moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a
motion to approve the Consent Calendar and to authorize execution of all
necessary documents contained therein. The motion carried unanimously
(5-0).
4. PUBLIC INOUlRIES/INFORMATlONAL
None,
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Assessment Hearinl! for the 2004 Street Reconstruction Proiect
.
Mayor Aplikowski stated this hearing was for the 2004 Street Reconstruction Project in the
Edgewater Neighborhood and would have a 5.5% interest rate, which could be paid over a 10-
year period,
ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
APRIL 26, 2004
3
.
Mr. Brown explained the project and the policies that were used to prepare the special
assessment roll.
Mayor Aplikowski explained the rules for the public hearing, She indicated anyone who
wanted to object to the assessment had to file a written objection prior to the close of the public
hearing, She noted the Council would not take any action or make specific comments regarding
a specific question or objection until all questions and objections had been made.
Mayor Aplikowski opened the public hearing at 7: 19 p.m.
David J. Monson and Mary Hirschboeck, 1175 Edgewater Avenne, stated they were
objecting to the assessment because the project would not enhance their property value to a
degree commensurate with the $9,159.43 assessment and may, in fact, diminish the value of their
property. They noted it was umesolved as to whether the northbound leg of Edgewater Avenue
would be rebuilt within the border of the existing roadway, and if the new road would cause their
driveway to be shorter than it currently was by virtue of the new location of the road, the market
value of their property would be significantly reduced, They noted the north end of the
reconstructed Edgewater would not terminate in a cul-de-sac, and that leg of the road would be
only 16 feet wide, therefore vehicles would still need to turn around in private driveways. The
narrowing of Edgewater Avenue would render on-street parking from the intersection with Lake
Lane, difficult if not impossible,
.
Dennis Stolp speaking on behalf of his parents, Raymond and Hazel Stolp, 3235 North
Lexington Avenne, stated his parents were objecting to their assessment because they did not
believe the improvement of Shoreline Lane would be an improvement to their property and
therefore, without any benefit being provided to their property, it was unfair to assess a portion of
the cost of the improvement against their property. He also noted the amount of the proposed
assessment was incorrectly calculated in that the entire frontage was being assessed, when
Shoreline Lane was actually a small portion of that length,
Gordon and Bette Dean, 3233 Shoreline Lane, stated they were objecting to their assessment
and requested the City reassess their property for the actual length of the street improvement that
borders their property. He noted they were being assessed for the full length of their property and
Shoreline Lane did not run the length of the property, He stated he was willing to pay for
approximately 85 feet of frontage, but not the entire length of 171.3 feet as proposed,
Shirley Ann Bambery, 1111 Connty Road D West, by letter - stated she was objecting to the
front footage calculation and requested the City reassess her property for the actual length, She
noted the City had the incorrect size of her lot in their records.
.
Margaret Mnrphy, 1111 Edgewater Avenue, asked for a reduction of her assessment because
she could not afford the amount being assessed against her property, She noted she was a single
parent and Mr. Moore had indicated there was a hardship form she could fill out asking for this
consideration. She stated she did not want to have to move and wanted to raise her children in
.
.
.
ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
APRlL 26, 2004
4
this community, She indicated the project would not improve her property because of the
location of her property,
Cindy Michalak, 1203 Edgewater Avenne, expressed concern about parking and the blocking
of the access, She asked if "No Parking" signs could be put up. She asked if the pond being
created would affect the other side of the wetland. Mr. Brown stated the existing area would
function the same way as it did today.
Ms. Michalak asked if there was a process in place in case residents had issues with the
construction. Mr. Moore stated there would be a neighborhood newsletter, which listed contact
names and phone numbers of the contractors, as well as City staff that could be accessed 24
hours a day.
Mr. Monson asked that future assessment formulas be addressed when it came to properties that
fronted two streets with the frontages being equal they were only being assessed for one side of
frontage.
Steve Petry, 1146 Edgewater, stated he was on a comer lot and he believed he was being
assessed unfairly. He noted he was not in favor of this improvement.
Douglas Anderson, 3195 Shoreline Lane, stated he was not opposed to the assessment. He
asked about the size of the cul-de-sac and if they could have surmountable curbs, Mr. Brown
replied 50 feet was the right-of-way and the typical design was larger, but they were going to try
and get the cul-de-sac within the right-of-way and they did not intend to acquire additional
property, He stated the curb would be a barrier curb, which made plowing easier.
Mayor Aplikowski closed the public hearing at 7:50 p.m,
Mayor Aplikowski stated staff would provide written documentation and information on the
various objections to be presented at the May 10, 2004 Council Meeting.
6. NEW BUSINESS
A. Award Street Sil!n Contract
Mr. Moore stated bids were received and opened for the street sign replacement program
project. He noted bids were received from seven contracts with the lowest bid from Northern
Traffic Supply, Inc. in the amount of$51,620. He indicated the engineer's estimate was $58,000.
He stated the engineer has had direct experience working with Northern Traffic Supply, Inc. as
the sign installation subcontractor on many roadway projects, He indicated based on review of
the bids, subsequent discussion and previous experience with the contractor, he felt that the bid
was reasonable and that Northern Traffic Supply, Inc. can successfully complete this project and
recommended this be approved,
ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
APRil., 26, 2004
5
.
Councilmember Holden asked what would happen with the old street signs, Mr. Moore
replied all of the old signs would be delivered to the maintenance shop for disposal. However, if
Council wants to do something with them, the signs would be available.
MOTION: Councilmember Larson moved and Councilmember Grant seconded a
motion to award the street sign program to Northern Traffic Supply, Inc. in
the amount of $51 ,620, The motion carried unanimously (5-0),
B. Improvements to Perry Park Fields #1 and #2
Mr. Moore stated the O&M Department had budgeted for improvements to Perry Park in the
2004 Capital Improvement Plan Budget. The proposed improvement would consist of a 10-foot
high outfield fence, with distance signage, on field #1 and a six-foot high sideline fence on fields
#1 and #2. In 2002, the City Council authorized the installation of a lO-foot high outfield fence
on field #2, He indicated the total cost, including sales tax, to install a lO-foot high outfield
fence, with distance signage, on field #1 and a six-foot high sideline fence on fields #1 and #2 is
$24,988. The budgeted amount in the 2004 Capital Improvement Plan Budget for improvements
to Perry Park fields #1 and #2 is $25,500. He stated staff recommended that the City Council
authorize the improvements to Perry Park fields #1 and #2, at a cost not to exceed $24,988,
.
MOTION: Councilmember Grant moved and Councilmember Larson seconded a
motion to authorize the improvements to Perry Park fields #1 and #2, at a
cost not to exceed $24,988, The motion carried unanimously (5-0).
C. Approve Plans and Anthorize Bids for Perrv Park Pavilion
Mr. Moore stated the need for a pavilion at Perry Park was identified in the May 7, 2002 Parks,
Trails and Open Space Plan. This Plan was approved by the Council in June 2002. The Parks,
Trails and Recreation Committee (PTRC), with Council approval, hired Hagen, Clrristensen &
McIlwain Architects (HCM) in August 2003 to design and coordinate the construction of the
pavilion at Perry Park. He indicated the 2004 Capital Improvement Plan budget for the
construction of a new pavilion at Perry Park is $350,000. The funding source for the project will
be the Park Fund. He stated staff recommends the Council approve the plans and authorize the
advertisement for and the obtaining of bids for the pavilion at Perry Park.
Councilmember Larson asked if the $350,000 was reflective of the actual cost of the building.
Mr. Moore replied it would include the firm's fees and the cost of the building.
Mayor Aplikowski asked if this also included trees and landscaping. Mr. Moore replied it did
include trees and landscaping.
.
MOTION: Councilmember Larson moved and Councilmember Grant seconded a
motion to approve the plans and authorize the advertisement for and the
obtaining of bids for the pavilion at Perry Park. The motion carried
unanimously (5-0).
.
.
.
ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
APRIL 26, 2004
6
D. Insuections Vehicle Purchase
Mr. Parrish stated the 2004 CIP budget included $20,000 for the purchase of a new inspection
vehicle, As outlined during the budget presentation, the current vehicle dedicated for
inspections, the 1992 Chevy S-l 0, was getting older and the impact of deferred maintenance had
become more apparent in recent years. The current schedule for replacement was generally 7
years.
He noted to replace the inspections vehicle, staff was proposing that a 2004 Chevy Blazer be
acquired via the state contract. The state contract price for this vehicle is $19,342. Sales tax and
related fees were estimated at $1,500. In addition, painting the Arden Hills logo on the side will
cost approximately $500, Based on the mentioned costs, the estimated total cost of the vehicle is
$21,342, or slightly higher than the $20,000 that was budgeted. Staff requests a contingency of
approximately $1,658 to account for any unforeseen circumstances. He recommended Council
authorize the purchase of an inspections vehicle in the amount not to exceed $23,000.
Councilmember Grant asked how many miles the Building Inspector put on his personal
vehicle last year. Mr. Parrish replied the estimate that was provided by the Building Inspector
was 150 miles per week on his personal vehicle. He noted he did not know what mileage was
put on the S-lO last year, He indicated, however, the Building Inspector did not turn in
reimbursement mileage because he did not choose to track his mileage.
Councilmember Grant stated he did not believe a four-wheel drive vehicle was necessary, Mr.
Parrish stated there was not a Blazer available under the State contract that did not have a four-
wheel drive option. He indicated the estimated useful life of this vehicle was seven years. He
noted if Council did not want a four-wheel drive vehicle, staff would need to look at the State
contract for a different vehicle,
Councilmember Grant stated he was not in favor of buying this vehicle and wanted staff to look
at other options, including other vehicles through the State contract.
Mayor Aplikowski asked how many vehicles were available to City Staff for their use. Mr.
Moore replied the S-lO was the only vehicle available to City Hall staff. He noted if the new
vehicle were purchased for the Building Inspectors, the S-IO would be freed up for City Hall staff
use.
Councilmember Larson stated he was in favor of purchasing this vehicle. He stated the vehicle
they were replacing was 12 years old. Mr. Parrish noted the S-IO would not be replaced, and
would still be in use.
Mr. Moore stated City vehicles were estimated to be replaced every seven to ten years. He
stated he could work with the Finance Director and develop a CIP plan for the replacement of all
vehicles so Council would be aware of all of the vehicle replacements in the future.
.
.
.
ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
APRIL 26, 2004
7
Councilmember Grant asked if two vehicles were enough for City Hall, Mr. Parrish replied
based on the employees who did field work, two vehicles should be sufficient assuming the City
did not hire a lot of additional employees.
Councilmember Rem noted the City Engineer position may not be filled right away.
MOTION: Councilmember Larson moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a
motion to authorize the purchase of an inspections vehicle in an amount
not to exceed $23,000, The motion carried (4-1 Councilmember Grant-
Nay),
E. Appoint Community Development Director
Ms. Wolfe noted through an internal staffreorgarnzation, the Community Development Director
position became vacant in February, The position was advertised through February 27,2004. A
total of 21 applications were received, Eight applicants were selected for the first round of
interviews. Upon completion, four finalists were selected to participate in a management
assessment and a second round of interviews. At the conclusion of the second interview, there
was general consensus on a top candidate for the position. The recommended candidate is Scott
Clark. She noted the proposed starting salary for Mr. Clark would be at step three of the 2004
compensation plan and at the second tier for PTO accrual. She recommended approving the
appointment of Scott Clark as Community Development Director for the City of Arden Hills,
effective May 26, 2004.
MOTION: Councilmember Grant moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a
motion to approve the appointment of Scott Clark as Community
Development Director for the City of Arden Hills, effective May 26,2004.
The motion carried unanimously (5-0).
Mayor Aplikowski stated Mr. Parrish was going to be leaving Arden Hills to be the City
Administrator for a northern Minnesota city. She thanked Mr. Parrish for all of his hard work
and dedication to the City of Arden Hills,
Councilmember Rem thanked Mr. Parrish for his hard work and wished him good luck in the
future.
Councilmember Larson wished Mr. Parrish good luck in the future.
Councilmember Grant also wished him well and thanked him for his work with the City.
Conncilmember Holden also thanked Mr. Parrish and wished him good luck.
F.
TCMP Phase III Planninl!:
ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
APRIL 26, 2004
8
.
Mr. Parrish stated currently, the Interim Development Agreement with CRR required that each
party agree to proceed to the next phase of planning. In conjunction with the approval of Phase
n, the Council authorized the beginning of Phase III. At this point, for various reasons, they have
not received authorization from CRR. In discussions witb the Mayor and Council, it was
indicated that the Council had a desire to proceed with Phase III planning as soon as practical.
He indicated based on additional discussions with CRR this week, they had indicated that they
were amenable to proceeding with Phase UI of the planning. He introduced Bart Rehbein,
Bart Rehbein, stated there had been concerns by both parties and he was hoping to have more
discussions with the Council before Phase UI would start. However, he would like to see the
planning process get started, He understood there was a concern regarding roles and
responsibilities and he looked forward to having further discussions regarding these issues. He
stated the development team wanted a higher level of commitment on the Interim Development
Agreement and they were anxious to have that dialogue and work through the Council's
concerns,
Councilmember Larson stated at some point the Council and staff would need to initiate some
sort of discussions with the development team to come up with a second Development
Agreement prior to the expiration ofthe Interim Development Agreement.
.
Councilmember Holden asked when Phase III would begin. Mr. Parrish replied dates had not
been set, but it would take approximately a month for everything to be ready.
7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A. Anthorize Implementation of Credit Card Transactions at Citv Hall
Mr. Siddiqui stated currently, the City did not accept credit card payments for its services.
Services that could potentially be paid by credit card include permit fees, licenses, utility
payments, fines, sports and recreation registration, etc, Over the past year, the City had received
a number of inquiries from the residents and contractors encouraging the City to accept credit
card payments. He indicated credit card payments were accepted by most cities in the metro
area, but the twe of services they accept payments for vary from city to city. He noted there
were two methods of accepting credit card payments. The first method was the "over the
counter" method where a card is either swiped through a credit card machine or the information
is manually inputted when it is provided over the telephone or through some other means. The
second method of accepting credit card payments was on-line.
.
He stated he had received additional information that outlined the requirements of this system,
He noted the City could not establish any minimums or maximums on the credit. He
recommended modifYing the recommendation to approve implementation of Phase I of the credit
acceptance system effective January 1, 2005, that would allow time to budget for costs of the
system and review the existing City fee schedule, He asked Council to direct staff to continue
research for Phase II ( on-line) for potential implementation next year.
.
.
.
ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
APRIL 26, 2004
9
MOTION:
Councilmember Larson moved and Councilmember Grant seconded a
motion to authorize implementation of Phase I credit acceptance system
effective January I, 2005 and direct staff to continue research for Phase II
(on-line) for implementation next year. The motion carried unanimously
(5-0).
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Ms. Wolfe - None.
Councilmember Holden - Asked about the $5,000 charge for tree removal in the Ingerson
Neighborhood. She asked what the City policy was regarding tree removal. Mr. Moore replied
there was an Ordinance regarding diseased trees and the procedures had been the City was
complaint respondent. He noted in this instance, the trees were either dead or damaged and were
a hazard to the public and therefore, they were removed. He indicated these trees were located
on City property,
Councilmember Grant - Stated the Assessment Task Force would be meeting this Thursday,
April 29, and it was expected this would be the last meeting, Their recommendations would be
forwarded to the Council in the near future.
Councilmember Rem - Stated Northwestern Youth and Family Services was having their
luncheon on Wednesday, May 5, She stated the Mounds View High School was having its next
task force meeting on Tuesday, She asked if they would be having a Development Team
Meeting before the next Council Meeting. Ms. Wolfe stated that the next meeting will be
Tuesday, May 4 at 8:00 a,m.
Councilmember Larson - Stated the Lake Johanna Fire Department Relief Association would
be meeting this Wednesday at the Hodgson Road station. He stated in their packet there was a
letter regarding the height of the Guidant ramp, He asked if staff had any further information
regarding this. Mr. Parrish stated he had not seen that letter, but staff would check the height of
the ramp.
Mayor Aplikowski - Ramsey County League of Local Government was having a meeting this
Thursday at Mounds View regarding the relationship between the City, County, and State
finances.
Mr. Filla - None.
Mayor Aplikowski adjourned the Regular City Council Meeting at 9:12 p,m,
B~k1':~ -
fJUif:1t (iU}l?f
Michelle Wo fe
.
.
.
ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
APRIL 26, 2004
10
NOTICE OF MEETINGS
The next Council Meeting will be held Monday, May 10, 2004 at 7:00 p.m, in the Arden Hills
Council Chambers.