The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About01-13-25-RAPPROVAL OF AGENDA TCAAP/Rice Creek Commons Update Jessica Jagoe, Interim City Administrator PUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL This is an opportunity for citizens to respectfully bring to the Council ’s attention any items which are relevant to the City. In addressing the Council, you must first state your name and address for the record. Comments shall be limited to three (3) minutes or less. Written documents or other materials should be handed to the City Clerk for distribution to the Council prior to or during the meeting. Council will generally not respond at the same meeting where an issue is initially raised by a member of the public but the Council may refer the issue to staff for further research and possible report or action at a future Council meeting. RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIES PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS Oath Of Office –Brenda Holden And Kurt Weber MEMO.PDF STAFF COMMENTS APPROVAL OF MINUTES December 9, 2024 City Council Work Session 12 -09 -24 WS.PDF December 9, 2024 Regular City Council 12 -09 -24 -R.PDF December 16, 2024 Special City Council Work Session 12 -16 -24 -SWS.PDF December 16, 2024 Special City Council 12 -16 -24 -SR.PDF CONSENT CALENDAR Those items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion under a Consent Calendar format. There will be no separate discussion of these items, unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda. Motion To Approve Claims And Payroll Joua Yang, Finance Director Pang Silseth, Accounting Analyst MEMO.PDF Motion To Approve Resolution 2025 -001 Relating To The 2025 Organization Of The City Of Arden Hills Julie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Motion To Approve Resolution 2025 -002 Relating To The 2025 Appointments And Chairs Of The Commissions And Committees Of The City Julie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Motion To Accept Resignation Of Frank Cupery From The Economic Development Commission Julie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk MEMO.PDF Motion To Approve Resolution 2025 -003 Relating To 2025 Curbside And Non - Curbside Recycling Fees Jen Estling, Deputy Clerk MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Motion To Approve Resolution 2025 -004 Related To Utilizing Complete Streets Principles In Transportation Planning And Community Design David Swearingen, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Motion To Approve Payment No. 3 (Final) –Arden Manor And Floral Park Improvements Project –Peterson Companies, Inc. Lucas Miller, Assistant Public Works Director MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF Motion To Approve Renewing Shared Service Agreement With Ramsey County For 2025 Grading And Erosion Control Inspections Lucas Miller, Assistant Public Works Director MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Motion To Approve Payment To Ramsey County For Right -Of-Way Acquisition Costs Through December 2024 ($277,460.80) –County Rd E/Old Snelling Avenue Roundabout Project; And Payment For Construction Engineering Fees And Costs ($1,354.707.10) –Mounds View High School Trail On Lake Valentine Road Lucas Miller, Assistant Public Works Director MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF Motion To Approve Met Council 2025 Private Property I/I Grant Agreement Lucas Miller, Assistant Public Works Director MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Motion To Approve Hiring Permit Technician/Office Support Specialist Jessica Jagoe, Interim City Administrator MEMO.PDF Motion To Accept Resignation Of Senior Communications Coordinator Jessica Jagoe, Interim City Administrator MEMO.PDF Motion To Approve Resolution 2025 -010 Approving Plans And Specifications And Ordering Ad For Bids –2025 CIPP Lining Project David Swearingen, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF Motion To Approve Resolution 2025 -005 Appointing Jessica Daniels To The Economic Development Commission Julie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Motion To Approve Purchase Of 2025 F550 Regular Cab Diesel Truck David Swearingen, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF PULLED CONSENT ITEMS Those items that are pulled from the Consent Calendar will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS Planning Case 24 -018 –Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan Review, Final Plat And Easement Vacation –1700 Highway 96 W –Trident Development, LLC T.J. Hofer, Planning Consultant MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF ATTACHMENT F.PDF ATTACHMENT G.PDF ATTACHMENT H.PDF ATTACHMENT I.PDF ATTACHMENT J.PDF ATTACHMENT K.PDF ATTACHMENT L.PDF ATTACHMENT M.PDF ATTACHMENT N.PDF ATTACHMENT O.PDF ATTACHMENT P.PDF ATTACHMENT Q.PDF ATTACHMENT R.PDF ATTACHMENT S.PDF ATTACHMENT T.PDF NEW BUSINESS Planning Cases 24 -015 And 24 -018 –1700 Highway 96 W –Trident Development, LLC •Resolution 2025 -006 PC 24 -015 Approving a Rezoning for Subject Property •Resolution 2025 -007 PC 24 -018 Approving a Conditional Use Permit for Lot 2, Block 1, Arden Heights Addition •Resolution 2025 -008 PC 24 -018 Vacating Drainage and Utility Easement T.J. Hofer, Planning Consultant MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF Resolution 2025 -009 Relating To The 2025 City Council Liaisons For Commissions And Committees And Mayor Pro -Tem Julie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Recruitment Of Senior Communications Coordinator Jessica Jagoe, Interim City Administrator MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF UNFINISHED BUSINESS COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS ADJOURN Mayor: David Grant Councilmembers: Brenda Holden Emily Rousseau Tena Monson Kurt Weber Regular City Council Agenda January 13, 2025 7:00 p.m. City Hall Address: 1245 W Highway 96 Arden Hills MN 55112 Phone: 651 -792 -7800 Website : www.cityofardenhills.org City Vision Arden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play. Members of the public may attend a meeting in -person at City Hall or they may view the meeting remotely on the City ’s website using the below link. Meetings are also broadcast on Cable Channel 16 for those that live in Arden Hills. https://cityofardenhills.org/320/Watch - City -Meetings This meeting will be streamed live on local Cable Channel 16 and available for playback on our website. CALL TO ORDER 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 5.A. Documents: 6. 7. 7.A. Documents: 7.B. Documents: 7.C. Documents: 7.D. Documents: 8. 8.A. Documents: 8.B. Documents: 8.C. Documents: 8.D. Documents: 8.E. Documents: 8.F. Documents: 8.G. Documents: 8.H. Documents: 8.I. Documents: 8.J. Documents: 8.K. Documents: 8.L. Documents: 8.M. Documents: 8.N. Documents: 8.O. Documents: 9. 10. 10.A. Documents: 11. 11.A. Documents: 11.B. Documents: 11.C. Documents: 12. 13. APPROVAL OF AGENDATCAAP/Rice Creek Commons UpdateJessica Jagoe, Interim City AdministratorPUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONALThis is an opportunity for citizens to respectfully bring to the Council ’s attention any items which are relevant to the City. In addressing the Council, you must first state your name and address for the record. Comments shall be limited to three (3) minutes or less. Written documents or other materials should be handed to the City Clerk for distribution to the Council prior to or during the meeting. Council will generally not respond at the same meeting where an issue is initially raised by a member of the public but the Council may refer the issue to staff for further research and possible report or action at a future Council meeting.RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIES PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS Oath Of Office –Brenda Holden And Kurt Weber MEMO.PDF STAFF COMMENTS APPROVAL OF MINUTES December 9, 2024 City Council Work Session 12 -09 -24 WS.PDF December 9, 2024 Regular City Council 12 -09 -24 -R.PDF December 16, 2024 Special City Council Work Session 12 -16 -24 -SWS.PDF December 16, 2024 Special City Council 12 -16 -24 -SR.PDF CONSENT CALENDAR Those items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion under a Consent Calendar format. There will be no separate discussion of these items, unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda. Motion To Approve Claims And Payroll Joua Yang, Finance Director Pang Silseth, Accounting Analyst MEMO.PDF Motion To Approve Resolution 2025 -001 Relating To The 2025 Organization Of The City Of Arden Hills Julie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Motion To Approve Resolution 2025 -002 Relating To The 2025 Appointments And Chairs Of The Commissions And Committees Of The City Julie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Motion To Accept Resignation Of Frank Cupery From The Economic Development Commission Julie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk MEMO.PDF Motion To Approve Resolution 2025 -003 Relating To 2025 Curbside And Non - Curbside Recycling Fees Jen Estling, Deputy Clerk MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Motion To Approve Resolution 2025 -004 Related To Utilizing Complete Streets Principles In Transportation Planning And Community Design David Swearingen, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Motion To Approve Payment No. 3 (Final) –Arden Manor And Floral Park Improvements Project –Peterson Companies, Inc. Lucas Miller, Assistant Public Works Director MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF Motion To Approve Renewing Shared Service Agreement With Ramsey County For 2025 Grading And Erosion Control Inspections Lucas Miller, Assistant Public Works Director MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Motion To Approve Payment To Ramsey County For Right -Of-Way Acquisition Costs Through December 2024 ($277,460.80) –County Rd E/Old Snelling Avenue Roundabout Project; And Payment For Construction Engineering Fees And Costs ($1,354.707.10) –Mounds View High School Trail On Lake Valentine Road Lucas Miller, Assistant Public Works Director MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF Motion To Approve Met Council 2025 Private Property I/I Grant Agreement Lucas Miller, Assistant Public Works Director MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Motion To Approve Hiring Permit Technician/Office Support Specialist Jessica Jagoe, Interim City Administrator MEMO.PDF Motion To Accept Resignation Of Senior Communications Coordinator Jessica Jagoe, Interim City Administrator MEMO.PDF Motion To Approve Resolution 2025 -010 Approving Plans And Specifications And Ordering Ad For Bids –2025 CIPP Lining Project David Swearingen, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF Motion To Approve Resolution 2025 -005 Appointing Jessica Daniels To The Economic Development Commission Julie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Motion To Approve Purchase Of 2025 F550 Regular Cab Diesel Truck David Swearingen, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF PULLED CONSENT ITEMS Those items that are pulled from the Consent Calendar will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS Planning Case 24 -018 –Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan Review, Final Plat And Easement Vacation –1700 Highway 96 W –Trident Development, LLC T.J. Hofer, Planning Consultant MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF ATTACHMENT F.PDF ATTACHMENT G.PDF ATTACHMENT H.PDF ATTACHMENT I.PDF ATTACHMENT J.PDF ATTACHMENT K.PDF ATTACHMENT L.PDF ATTACHMENT M.PDF ATTACHMENT N.PDF ATTACHMENT O.PDF ATTACHMENT P.PDF ATTACHMENT Q.PDF ATTACHMENT R.PDF ATTACHMENT S.PDF ATTACHMENT T.PDF NEW BUSINESS Planning Cases 24 -015 And 24 -018 –1700 Highway 96 W –Trident Development, LLC •Resolution 2025 -006 PC 24 -015 Approving a Rezoning for Subject Property •Resolution 2025 -007 PC 24 -018 Approving a Conditional Use Permit for Lot 2, Block 1, Arden Heights Addition •Resolution 2025 -008 PC 24 -018 Vacating Drainage and Utility Easement T.J. Hofer, Planning Consultant MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF Resolution 2025 -009 Relating To The 2025 City Council Liaisons For Commissions And Committees And Mayor Pro -Tem Julie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Recruitment Of Senior Communications Coordinator Jessica Jagoe, Interim City Administrator MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF UNFINISHED BUSINESS COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS ADJOURN Mayor:David GrantCouncilmembers:Brenda HoldenEmily RousseauTena MonsonKurt Weber Regular City Council AgendaJanuary 13, 2025 7:00 p.m. City Hall Address:1245 W Highway 96Arden Hills MN 55112Phone:651 -792 -7800Website:www.cityofardenhills.orgCity VisionArden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play.Members of the public may attend a meeting in -person at City Hall or they may view the meeting remotely on the City ’s website using the below link. Meetings are also broadcast on Cable Channel 16 for those that live in Arden Hills.https://cityofardenhills.org/320/Watch -City -MeetingsThis meeting will be streamed live on local Cable Channel 16 and available for playback on our website.CALL TO ORDER1.2.3.4. 5. 5.A. Documents: 6. 7. 7.A. Documents: 7.B. Documents: 7.C. Documents: 7.D. Documents: 8. 8.A. Documents: 8.B. Documents: 8.C. Documents: 8.D. Documents: 8.E. Documents: 8.F. Documents: 8.G. Documents: 8.H. Documents: 8.I. Documents: 8.J. Documents: 8.K. Documents: 8.L. Documents: 8.M. Documents: 8.N. Documents: 8.O. Documents: 9. 10. 10.A. Documents: 11. 11.A. Documents: 11.B. Documents: 11.C. Documents: 12. 13. APPROVAL OF AGENDATCAAP/Rice Creek Commons UpdateJessica Jagoe, Interim City AdministratorPUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONALThis is an opportunity for citizens to respectfully bring to the Council ’s attention any items which are relevant to the City. In addressing the Council, you must first state your name and address for the record. Comments shall be limited to three (3) minutes or less. Written documents or other materials should be handed to the City Clerk for distribution to the Council prior to or during the meeting. Council will generally not respond at the same meeting where an issue is initially raised by a member of the public but the Council may refer the issue to staff for further research and possible report or action at a future Council meeting.RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIESPUBLIC PRESENTATIONSOath Of Office –Brenda Holden And Kurt WeberMEMO.PDFSTAFF COMMENTSAPPROVAL OF MINUTESDecember 9, 2024 City Council Work Session12-09 -24 WS.PDFDecember 9, 2024 Regular City Council12-09 -24 -R.PDFDecember 16, 2024 Special City Council Work Session12-16 -24 -SWS.PDFDecember 16, 2024 Special City Council12-16 -24 -SR.PDFCONSENT CALENDARThose items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion under a Consent Calendar format. There will be no separate discussion of these items, unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda.Motion To Approve Claims And PayrollJoua Yang, Finance DirectorPang Silseth, Accounting Analyst MEMO.PDF Motion To Approve Resolution 2025 -001 Relating To The 2025 Organization Of The City Of Arden Hills Julie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Motion To Approve Resolution 2025 -002 Relating To The 2025 Appointments And Chairs Of The Commissions And Committees Of The City Julie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Motion To Accept Resignation Of Frank Cupery From The Economic Development Commission Julie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk MEMO.PDF Motion To Approve Resolution 2025 -003 Relating To 2025 Curbside And Non - Curbside Recycling Fees Jen Estling, Deputy Clerk MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Motion To Approve Resolution 2025 -004 Related To Utilizing Complete Streets Principles In Transportation Planning And Community Design David Swearingen, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Motion To Approve Payment No. 3 (Final) –Arden Manor And Floral Park Improvements Project –Peterson Companies, Inc. Lucas Miller, Assistant Public Works Director MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF Motion To Approve Renewing Shared Service Agreement With Ramsey County For 2025 Grading And Erosion Control Inspections Lucas Miller, Assistant Public Works Director MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Motion To Approve Payment To Ramsey County For Right -Of-Way Acquisition Costs Through December 2024 ($277,460.80) –County Rd E/Old Snelling Avenue Roundabout Project; And Payment For Construction Engineering Fees And Costs ($1,354.707.10) –Mounds View High School Trail On Lake Valentine Road Lucas Miller, Assistant Public Works Director MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF Motion To Approve Met Council 2025 Private Property I/I Grant Agreement Lucas Miller, Assistant Public Works Director MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Motion To Approve Hiring Permit Technician/Office Support Specialist Jessica Jagoe, Interim City Administrator MEMO.PDF Motion To Accept Resignation Of Senior Communications Coordinator Jessica Jagoe, Interim City Administrator MEMO.PDF Motion To Approve Resolution 2025 -010 Approving Plans And Specifications And Ordering Ad For Bids –2025 CIPP Lining Project David Swearingen, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF Motion To Approve Resolution 2025 -005 Appointing Jessica Daniels To The Economic Development Commission Julie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Motion To Approve Purchase Of 2025 F550 Regular Cab Diesel Truck David Swearingen, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF PULLED CONSENT ITEMS Those items that are pulled from the Consent Calendar will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS Planning Case 24 -018 –Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan Review, Final Plat And Easement Vacation –1700 Highway 96 W –Trident Development, LLC T.J. Hofer, Planning Consultant MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF ATTACHMENT F.PDF ATTACHMENT G.PDF ATTACHMENT H.PDF ATTACHMENT I.PDF ATTACHMENT J.PDF ATTACHMENT K.PDF ATTACHMENT L.PDF ATTACHMENT M.PDF ATTACHMENT N.PDF ATTACHMENT O.PDF ATTACHMENT P.PDF ATTACHMENT Q.PDF ATTACHMENT R.PDF ATTACHMENT S.PDF ATTACHMENT T.PDF NEW BUSINESS Planning Cases 24 -015 And 24 -018 –1700 Highway 96 W –Trident Development, LLC •Resolution 2025 -006 PC 24 -015 Approving a Rezoning for Subject Property •Resolution 2025 -007 PC 24 -018 Approving a Conditional Use Permit for Lot 2, Block 1, Arden Heights Addition •Resolution 2025 -008 PC 24 -018 Vacating Drainage and Utility Easement T.J. Hofer, Planning Consultant MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF Resolution 2025 -009 Relating To The 2025 City Council Liaisons For Commissions And Committees And Mayor Pro -Tem Julie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Recruitment Of Senior Communications Coordinator Jessica Jagoe, Interim City Administrator MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF UNFINISHED BUSINESS COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS ADJOURN Mayor:David GrantCouncilmembers:Brenda HoldenEmily RousseauTena MonsonKurt Weber Regular City Council AgendaJanuary 13, 2025 7:00 p.m. City Hall Address:1245 W Highway 96Arden Hills MN 55112Phone:651 -792 -7800Website:www.cityofardenhills.orgCity VisionArden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play.Members of the public may attend a meeting in -person at City Hall or they may view the meeting remotely on the City ’s website using the below link. Meetings are also broadcast on Cable Channel 16 for those that live in Arden Hills.https://cityofardenhills.org/320/Watch -City -MeetingsThis meeting will be streamed live on local Cable Channel 16 and available for playback on our website.CALL TO ORDER1.2.3.4.5.5.A.Documents:6.7.7.A.Documents:7.B.Documents:7.C.Documents:7.D.Documents:8.8.A.Documents: 8.B. Documents: 8.C. Documents: 8.D. Documents: 8.E. Documents: 8.F. Documents: 8.G. Documents: 8.H. Documents: 8.I. Documents: 8.J. Documents: 8.K. Documents: 8.L. Documents: 8.M. Documents: 8.N. Documents: 8.O. Documents: 9. 10. 10.A. Documents: 11. 11.A. Documents: 11.B. Documents: 11.C. Documents: 12. 13. APPROVAL OF AGENDATCAAP/Rice Creek Commons UpdateJessica Jagoe, Interim City AdministratorPUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONALThis is an opportunity for citizens to respectfully bring to the Council ’s attention any items which are relevant to the City. In addressing the Council, you must first state your name and address for the record. Comments shall be limited to three (3) minutes or less. Written documents or other materials should be handed to the City Clerk for distribution to the Council prior to or during the meeting. Council will generally not respond at the same meeting where an issue is initially raised by a member of the public but the Council may refer the issue to staff for further research and possible report or action at a future Council meeting.RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIESPUBLIC PRESENTATIONSOath Of Office –Brenda Holden And Kurt WeberMEMO.PDFSTAFF COMMENTSAPPROVAL OF MINUTESDecember 9, 2024 City Council Work Session12-09 -24 WS.PDFDecember 9, 2024 Regular City Council12-09 -24 -R.PDFDecember 16, 2024 Special City Council Work Session12-16 -24 -SWS.PDFDecember 16, 2024 Special City Council12-16 -24 -SR.PDFCONSENT CALENDARThose items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion under a Consent Calendar format. There will be no separate discussion of these items, unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda.Motion To Approve Claims And PayrollJoua Yang, Finance DirectorPang Silseth, Accounting AnalystMEMO.PDFMotion To Approve Resolution 2025 -001 Relating To The 2025 Organization Of The City Of Arden HillsJulie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City ClerkMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFMotion To Approve Resolution 2025 -002 Relating To The 2025 Appointments And Chairs Of The Commissions And Committees Of The City Julie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City ClerkMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFMotion To Accept Resignation Of Frank Cupery From The Economic Development Commission Julie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City ClerkMEMO.PDFMotion To Approve Resolution 2025 -003 Relating To 2025 Curbside And Non -Curbside Recycling Fees Jen Estling, Deputy ClerkMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFMotion To Approve Resolution 2025 -004 Related To Utilizing Complete Streets Principles In Transportation Planning And Community DesignDavid Swearingen, Public Works Director/City EngineerMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFMotion To Approve Payment No. 3 (Final) –Arden Manor And Floral Park Improvements Project –Peterson Companies, Inc. Lucas Miller, Assistant Public Works Director MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF Motion To Approve Renewing Shared Service Agreement With Ramsey County For 2025 Grading And Erosion Control Inspections Lucas Miller, Assistant Public Works Director MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Motion To Approve Payment To Ramsey County For Right -Of-Way Acquisition Costs Through December 2024 ($277,460.80) –County Rd E/Old Snelling Avenue Roundabout Project; And Payment For Construction Engineering Fees And Costs ($1,354.707.10) –Mounds View High School Trail On Lake Valentine Road Lucas Miller, Assistant Public Works Director MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF Motion To Approve Met Council 2025 Private Property I/I Grant Agreement Lucas Miller, Assistant Public Works Director MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Motion To Approve Hiring Permit Technician/Office Support Specialist Jessica Jagoe, Interim City Administrator MEMO.PDF Motion To Accept Resignation Of Senior Communications Coordinator Jessica Jagoe, Interim City Administrator MEMO.PDF Motion To Approve Resolution 2025 -010 Approving Plans And Specifications And Ordering Ad For Bids –2025 CIPP Lining Project David Swearingen, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF Motion To Approve Resolution 2025 -005 Appointing Jessica Daniels To The Economic Development Commission Julie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Motion To Approve Purchase Of 2025 F550 Regular Cab Diesel Truck David Swearingen, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF PULLED CONSENT ITEMS Those items that are pulled from the Consent Calendar will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS Planning Case 24 -018 –Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan Review, Final Plat And Easement Vacation –1700 Highway 96 W –Trident Development, LLC T.J. Hofer, Planning Consultant MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF ATTACHMENT F.PDF ATTACHMENT G.PDF ATTACHMENT H.PDF ATTACHMENT I.PDF ATTACHMENT J.PDF ATTACHMENT K.PDF ATTACHMENT L.PDF ATTACHMENT M.PDF ATTACHMENT N.PDF ATTACHMENT O.PDF ATTACHMENT P.PDF ATTACHMENT Q.PDF ATTACHMENT R.PDF ATTACHMENT S.PDF ATTACHMENT T.PDF NEW BUSINESS Planning Cases 24 -015 And 24 -018 –1700 Highway 96 W –Trident Development, LLC •Resolution 2025 -006 PC 24 -015 Approving a Rezoning for Subject Property •Resolution 2025 -007 PC 24 -018 Approving a Conditional Use Permit for Lot 2, Block 1, Arden Heights Addition •Resolution 2025 -008 PC 24 -018 Vacating Drainage and Utility Easement T.J. Hofer, Planning Consultant MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF Resolution 2025 -009 Relating To The 2025 City Council Liaisons For Commissions And Committees And Mayor Pro -Tem Julie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Recruitment Of Senior Communications Coordinator Jessica Jagoe, Interim City Administrator MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF UNFINISHED BUSINESS COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS ADJOURN Mayor:David GrantCouncilmembers:Brenda HoldenEmily RousseauTena MonsonKurt Weber Regular City Council AgendaJanuary 13, 2025 7:00 p.m. City Hall Address:1245 W Highway 96Arden Hills MN 55112Phone:651 -792 -7800Website:www.cityofardenhills.orgCity VisionArden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play.Members of the public may attend a meeting in -person at City Hall or they may view the meeting remotely on the City ’s website using the below link. Meetings are also broadcast on Cable Channel 16 for those that live in Arden Hills.https://cityofardenhills.org/320/Watch -City -MeetingsThis meeting will be streamed live on local Cable Channel 16 and available for playback on our website.CALL TO ORDER1.2.3.4.5.5.A.Documents:6.7.7.A.Documents:7.B.Documents:7.C.Documents:7.D.Documents:8.8.A.Documents:8.B.Documents:8.C.Documents:8.D.Documents:8.E.Documents:8.F.Documents:8.G. Documents: 8.H. Documents: 8.I. Documents: 8.J. Documents: 8.K. Documents: 8.L. Documents: 8.M. Documents: 8.N. Documents: 8.O. Documents: 9. 10. 10.A. Documents: 11. 11.A. Documents: 11.B. Documents: 11.C. Documents: 12. 13. APPROVAL OF AGENDATCAAP/Rice Creek Commons UpdateJessica Jagoe, Interim City AdministratorPUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONALThis is an opportunity for citizens to respectfully bring to the Council ’s attention any items which are relevant to the City. In addressing the Council, you must first state your name and address for the record. Comments shall be limited to three (3) minutes or less. Written documents or other materials should be handed to the City Clerk for distribution to the Council prior to or during the meeting. Council will generally not respond at the same meeting where an issue is initially raised by a member of the public but the Council may refer the issue to staff for further research and possible report or action at a future Council meeting.RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIESPUBLIC PRESENTATIONSOath Of Office –Brenda Holden And Kurt WeberMEMO.PDFSTAFF COMMENTSAPPROVAL OF MINUTESDecember 9, 2024 City Council Work Session12-09 -24 WS.PDFDecember 9, 2024 Regular City Council12-09 -24 -R.PDFDecember 16, 2024 Special City Council Work Session12-16 -24 -SWS.PDFDecember 16, 2024 Special City Council12-16 -24 -SR.PDFCONSENT CALENDARThose items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion under a Consent Calendar format. There will be no separate discussion of these items, unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda.Motion To Approve Claims And PayrollJoua Yang, Finance DirectorPang Silseth, Accounting AnalystMEMO.PDFMotion To Approve Resolution 2025 -001 Relating To The 2025 Organization Of The City Of Arden HillsJulie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City ClerkMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFMotion To Approve Resolution 2025 -002 Relating To The 2025 Appointments And Chairs Of The Commissions And Committees Of The City Julie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City ClerkMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFMotion To Accept Resignation Of Frank Cupery From The Economic Development Commission Julie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City ClerkMEMO.PDFMotion To Approve Resolution 2025 -003 Relating To 2025 Curbside And Non -Curbside Recycling Fees Jen Estling, Deputy ClerkMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFMotion To Approve Resolution 2025 -004 Related To Utilizing Complete Streets Principles In Transportation Planning And Community DesignDavid Swearingen, Public Works Director/City EngineerMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFMotion To Approve Payment No. 3 (Final) –Arden Manor And Floral Park Improvements Project –Peterson Companies, Inc.Lucas Miller, Assistant Public Works DirectorMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFMotion To Approve Renewing Shared Service Agreement With Ramsey County For 2025 Grading And Erosion Control InspectionsLucas Miller, Assistant Public Works DirectorMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFMotion To Approve Payment To Ramsey County For Right -Of-Way Acquisition Costs Through December 2024 ($277,460.80) –County Rd E/Old Snelling Avenue Roundabout Project; And Payment For Construction Engineering Fees And Costs ($1,354.707.10) –Mounds View High School Trail On Lake Valentine RoadLucas Miller, Assistant Public Works DirectorMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFMotion To Approve Met Council 2025 Private Property I/I Grant Agreement Lucas Miller, Assistant Public Works Director MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFMotion To Approve Hiring Permit Technician/Office Support SpecialistJessica Jagoe, Interim City AdministratorMEMO.PDFMotion To Accept Resignation Of Senior Communications CoordinatorJessica Jagoe, Interim City Administrator MEMO.PDF Motion To Approve Resolution 2025 -010 Approving Plans And Specifications And Ordering Ad For Bids –2025 CIPP Lining Project David Swearingen, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF Motion To Approve Resolution 2025 -005 Appointing Jessica Daniels To The Economic Development Commission Julie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Motion To Approve Purchase Of 2025 F550 Regular Cab Diesel Truck David Swearingen, Public Works Director/City Engineer MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF PULLED CONSENT ITEMS Those items that are pulled from the Consent Calendar will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS Planning Case 24 -018 –Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan Review, Final Plat And Easement Vacation –1700 Highway 96 W –Trident Development, LLC T.J. Hofer, Planning Consultant MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF ATTACHMENT F.PDF ATTACHMENT G.PDF ATTACHMENT H.PDF ATTACHMENT I.PDF ATTACHMENT J.PDF ATTACHMENT K.PDF ATTACHMENT L.PDF ATTACHMENT M.PDF ATTACHMENT N.PDF ATTACHMENT O.PDF ATTACHMENT P.PDF ATTACHMENT Q.PDF ATTACHMENT R.PDF ATTACHMENT S.PDF ATTACHMENT T.PDF NEW BUSINESS Planning Cases 24 -015 And 24 -018 –1700 Highway 96 W –Trident Development, LLC •Resolution 2025 -006 PC 24 -015 Approving a Rezoning for Subject Property •Resolution 2025 -007 PC 24 -018 Approving a Conditional Use Permit for Lot 2, Block 1, Arden Heights Addition •Resolution 2025 -008 PC 24 -018 Vacating Drainage and Utility Easement T.J. Hofer, Planning Consultant MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF Resolution 2025 -009 Relating To The 2025 City Council Liaisons For Commissions And Committees And Mayor Pro -Tem Julie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Recruitment Of Senior Communications Coordinator Jessica Jagoe, Interim City Administrator MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF UNFINISHED BUSINESS COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS ADJOURN Mayor:David GrantCouncilmembers:Brenda HoldenEmily RousseauTena MonsonKurt Weber Regular City Council AgendaJanuary 13, 2025 7:00 p.m. City Hall Address:1245 W Highway 96Arden Hills MN 55112Phone:651 -792 -7800Website:www.cityofardenhills.orgCity VisionArden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play.Members of the public may attend a meeting in -person at City Hall or they may view the meeting remotely on the City ’s website using the below link. Meetings are also broadcast on Cable Channel 16 for those that live in Arden Hills.https://cityofardenhills.org/320/Watch -City -MeetingsThis meeting will be streamed live on local Cable Channel 16 and available for playback on our website.CALL TO ORDER1.2.3.4.5.5.A.Documents:6.7.7.A.Documents:7.B.Documents:7.C.Documents:7.D.Documents:8.8.A.Documents:8.B.Documents:8.C.Documents:8.D.Documents:8.E.Documents:8.F.Documents:8.G.Documents:8.H.Documents:8.I.Documents:8.J.Documents:8.K.Documents:8.L. Documents: 8.M. Documents: 8.N. Documents: 8.O. Documents: 9. 10. 10.A. Documents: 11. 11.A. Documents: 11.B. Documents: 11.C. Documents: 12. 13. APPROVAL OF AGENDATCAAP/Rice Creek Commons UpdateJessica Jagoe, Interim City AdministratorPUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONALThis is an opportunity for citizens to respectfully bring to the Council ’s attention any items which are relevant to the City. In addressing the Council, you must first state your name and address for the record. Comments shall be limited to three (3) minutes or less. Written documents or other materials should be handed to the City Clerk for distribution to the Council prior to or during the meeting. Council will generally not respond at the same meeting where an issue is initially raised by a member of the public but the Council may refer the issue to staff for further research and possible report or action at a future Council meeting.RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIESPUBLIC PRESENTATIONSOath Of Office –Brenda Holden And Kurt WeberMEMO.PDFSTAFF COMMENTSAPPROVAL OF MINUTESDecember 9, 2024 City Council Work Session12-09 -24 WS.PDFDecember 9, 2024 Regular City Council12-09 -24 -R.PDFDecember 16, 2024 Special City Council Work Session12-16 -24 -SWS.PDFDecember 16, 2024 Special City Council12-16 -24 -SR.PDFCONSENT CALENDARThose items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion under a Consent Calendar format. There will be no separate discussion of these items, unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda.Motion To Approve Claims And PayrollJoua Yang, Finance DirectorPang Silseth, Accounting AnalystMEMO.PDFMotion To Approve Resolution 2025 -001 Relating To The 2025 Organization Of The City Of Arden HillsJulie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City ClerkMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFMotion To Approve Resolution 2025 -002 Relating To The 2025 Appointments And Chairs Of The Commissions And Committees Of The City Julie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City ClerkMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFMotion To Accept Resignation Of Frank Cupery From The Economic Development Commission Julie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City ClerkMEMO.PDFMotion To Approve Resolution 2025 -003 Relating To 2025 Curbside And Non -Curbside Recycling Fees Jen Estling, Deputy ClerkMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFMotion To Approve Resolution 2025 -004 Related To Utilizing Complete Streets Principles In Transportation Planning And Community DesignDavid Swearingen, Public Works Director/City EngineerMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFMotion To Approve Payment No. 3 (Final) –Arden Manor And Floral Park Improvements Project –Peterson Companies, Inc.Lucas Miller, Assistant Public Works DirectorMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFMotion To Approve Renewing Shared Service Agreement With Ramsey County For 2025 Grading And Erosion Control InspectionsLucas Miller, Assistant Public Works DirectorMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFMotion To Approve Payment To Ramsey County For Right -Of-Way Acquisition Costs Through December 2024 ($277,460.80) –County Rd E/Old Snelling Avenue Roundabout Project; And Payment For Construction Engineering Fees And Costs ($1,354.707.10) –Mounds View High School Trail On Lake Valentine RoadLucas Miller, Assistant Public Works DirectorMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFMotion To Approve Met Council 2025 Private Property I/I Grant Agreement Lucas Miller, Assistant Public Works Director MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFMotion To Approve Hiring Permit Technician/Office Support SpecialistJessica Jagoe, Interim City AdministratorMEMO.PDFMotion To Accept Resignation Of Senior Communications CoordinatorJessica Jagoe, Interim City AdministratorMEMO.PDFMotion To Approve Resolution 2025 -010 Approving Plans And Specifications And Ordering Ad For Bids –2025 CIPP Lining ProjectDavid Swearingen, Public Works Director/City EngineerMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFMotion To Approve Resolution 2025 -005 Appointing Jessica Daniels To The Economic Development Commission Julie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City ClerkMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFMotion To Approve Purchase Of 2025 F550 Regular Cab Diesel TruckDavid Swearingen, Public Works Director/City EngineerMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFATTACHMENT D.PDFATTACHMENT E.PDFPULLED CONSENT ITEMSThose items that are pulled from the Consent Calendar will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda.PUBLIC HEARINGSPlanning Case 24 -018 –Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan Review, Final Plat And Easement Vacation –1700 Highway 96 W –Trident Development, LLCT.J. Hofer, Planning Consultant MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF ATTACHMENT F.PDF ATTACHMENT G.PDF ATTACHMENT H.PDF ATTACHMENT I.PDF ATTACHMENT J.PDF ATTACHMENT K.PDF ATTACHMENT L.PDF ATTACHMENT M.PDF ATTACHMENT N.PDF ATTACHMENT O.PDF ATTACHMENT P.PDF ATTACHMENT Q.PDF ATTACHMENT R.PDF ATTACHMENT S.PDF ATTACHMENT T.PDF NEW BUSINESS Planning Cases 24 -015 And 24 -018 –1700 Highway 96 W –Trident Development, LLC •Resolution 2025 -006 PC 24 -015 Approving a Rezoning for Subject Property •Resolution 2025 -007 PC 24 -018 Approving a Conditional Use Permit for Lot 2, Block 1, Arden Heights Addition •Resolution 2025 -008 PC 24 -018 Vacating Drainage and Utility Easement T.J. Hofer, Planning Consultant MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF Resolution 2025 -009 Relating To The 2025 City Council Liaisons For Commissions And Committees And Mayor Pro -Tem Julie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF Recruitment Of Senior Communications Coordinator Jessica Jagoe, Interim City Administrator MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF UNFINISHED BUSINESS COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS ADJOURN Mayor:David GrantCouncilmembers:Brenda HoldenEmily RousseauTena MonsonKurt Weber Regular City Council AgendaJanuary 13, 2025 7:00 p.m. City Hall Address:1245 W Highway 96Arden Hills MN 55112Phone:651 -792 -7800Website:www.cityofardenhills.orgCity VisionArden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play.Members of the public may attend a meeting in -person at City Hall or they may view the meeting remotely on the City ’s website using the below link. Meetings are also broadcast on Cable Channel 16 for those that live in Arden Hills.https://cityofardenhills.org/320/Watch -City -MeetingsThis meeting will be streamed live on local Cable Channel 16 and available for playback on our website.CALL TO ORDER1.2.3.4.5.5.A.Documents:6.7.7.A.Documents:7.B.Documents:7.C.Documents:7.D.Documents:8.8.A.Documents:8.B.Documents:8.C.Documents:8.D.Documents:8.E.Documents:8.F.Documents:8.G.Documents:8.H.Documents:8.I.Documents:8.J.Documents:8.K.Documents:8.L.Documents:8.M.Documents:8.N.Documents:8.O.Documents:9.10.10.A.Documents: 11. 11.A. Documents: 11.B. Documents: 11.C. Documents: 12. 13. APPROVAL OF AGENDATCAAP/Rice Creek Commons UpdateJessica Jagoe, Interim City AdministratorPUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONALThis is an opportunity for citizens to respectfully bring to the Council ’s attention any items which are relevant to the City. In addressing the Council, you must first state your name and address for the record. Comments shall be limited to three (3) minutes or less. Written documents or other materials should be handed to the City Clerk for distribution to the Council prior to or during the meeting. Council will generally not respond at the same meeting where an issue is initially raised by a member of the public but the Council may refer the issue to staff for further research and possible report or action at a future Council meeting.RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIESPUBLIC PRESENTATIONSOath Of Office –Brenda Holden And Kurt WeberMEMO.PDFSTAFF COMMENTSAPPROVAL OF MINUTESDecember 9, 2024 City Council Work Session12-09 -24 WS.PDFDecember 9, 2024 Regular City Council12-09 -24 -R.PDFDecember 16, 2024 Special City Council Work Session12-16 -24 -SWS.PDFDecember 16, 2024 Special City Council12-16 -24 -SR.PDFCONSENT CALENDARThose items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion under a Consent Calendar format. There will be no separate discussion of these items, unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda.Motion To Approve Claims And PayrollJoua Yang, Finance DirectorPang Silseth, Accounting AnalystMEMO.PDFMotion To Approve Resolution 2025 -001 Relating To The 2025 Organization Of The City Of Arden HillsJulie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City ClerkMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFMotion To Approve Resolution 2025 -002 Relating To The 2025 Appointments And Chairs Of The Commissions And Committees Of The City Julie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City ClerkMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFMotion To Accept Resignation Of Frank Cupery From The Economic Development Commission Julie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City ClerkMEMO.PDFMotion To Approve Resolution 2025 -003 Relating To 2025 Curbside And Non -Curbside Recycling Fees Jen Estling, Deputy ClerkMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFMotion To Approve Resolution 2025 -004 Related To Utilizing Complete Streets Principles In Transportation Planning And Community DesignDavid Swearingen, Public Works Director/City EngineerMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFMotion To Approve Payment No. 3 (Final) –Arden Manor And Floral Park Improvements Project –Peterson Companies, Inc.Lucas Miller, Assistant Public Works DirectorMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFMotion To Approve Renewing Shared Service Agreement With Ramsey County For 2025 Grading And Erosion Control InspectionsLucas Miller, Assistant Public Works DirectorMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFMotion To Approve Payment To Ramsey County For Right -Of-Way Acquisition Costs Through December 2024 ($277,460.80) –County Rd E/Old Snelling Avenue Roundabout Project; And Payment For Construction Engineering Fees And Costs ($1,354.707.10) –Mounds View High School Trail On Lake Valentine RoadLucas Miller, Assistant Public Works DirectorMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFMotion To Approve Met Council 2025 Private Property I/I Grant Agreement Lucas Miller, Assistant Public Works Director MEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFMotion To Approve Hiring Permit Technician/Office Support SpecialistJessica Jagoe, Interim City AdministratorMEMO.PDFMotion To Accept Resignation Of Senior Communications CoordinatorJessica Jagoe, Interim City AdministratorMEMO.PDFMotion To Approve Resolution 2025 -010 Approving Plans And Specifications And Ordering Ad For Bids –2025 CIPP Lining ProjectDavid Swearingen, Public Works Director/City EngineerMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFMotion To Approve Resolution 2025 -005 Appointing Jessica Daniels To The Economic Development Commission Julie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City ClerkMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFMotion To Approve Purchase Of 2025 F550 Regular Cab Diesel TruckDavid Swearingen, Public Works Director/City EngineerMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFATTACHMENT D.PDFATTACHMENT E.PDFPULLED CONSENT ITEMSThose items that are pulled from the Consent Calendar will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda.PUBLIC HEARINGSPlanning Case 24 -018 –Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan Review, Final Plat And Easement Vacation –1700 Highway 96 W –Trident Development, LLCT.J. Hofer, Planning ConsultantMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFATTACHMENT D.PDFATTACHMENT E.PDFATTACHMENT F.PDFATTACHMENT G.PDFATTACHMENT H.PDFATTACHMENT I.PDFATTACHMENT J.PDFATTACHMENT K.PDFATTACHMENT L.PDFATTACHMENT M.PDFATTACHMENT N.PDFATTACHMENT O.PDFATTACHMENT P.PDFATTACHMENT Q.PDFATTACHMENT R.PDFATTACHMENT S.PDFATTACHMENT T.PDFNEW BUSINESSPlanning Cases 24 -015 And 24 -018 –1700 Highway 96 W –Trident Development, LLC•Resolution 2025 -006 PC 24 -015 Approving a Rezoning for Subject Property •Resolution 2025 -007 PC 24 -018 Approving a Conditional Use Permit for Lot 2, Block 1, Arden Heights Addition•Resolution 2025 -008 PC 24 -018 Vacating Drainage and Utility EasementT.J. Hofer, Planning ConsultantMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFATTACHMENT B.PDFATTACHMENT C.PDFATTACHMENT D.PDFATTACHMENT E.PDFResolution 2025 -009 Relating To The 2025 City Council Liaisons For Commissions And Committees And Mayor Pro -Tem Julie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City ClerkMEMO.PDFATTACHMENT A.PDFRecruitment Of Senior Communications Coordinator Jessica Jagoe, Interim City Administrator MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF UNFINISHED BUSINESS COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS ADJOURN Mayor:David GrantCouncilmembers:Brenda HoldenEmily RousseauTena MonsonKurt Weber Regular City Council AgendaJanuary 13, 2025 7:00 p.m. City Hall Address:1245 W Highway 96Arden Hills MN 55112Phone:651 -792 -7800Website:www.cityofardenhills.orgCity VisionArden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long -standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play.Members of the public may attend a meeting in -person at City Hall or they may view the meeting remotely on the City ’s website using the below link. Meetings are also broadcast on Cable Channel 16 for those that live in Arden Hills.https://cityofardenhills.org/320/Watch -City -MeetingsThis meeting will be streamed live on local Cable Channel 16 and available for playback on our website.CALL TO ORDER1.2.3.4.5.5.A.Documents:6.7.7.A.Documents:7.B.Documents:7.C.Documents:7.D.Documents:8.8.A.Documents:8.B.Documents:8.C.Documents:8.D.Documents:8.E.Documents:8.F.Documents:8.G.Documents:8.H.Documents:8.I.Documents:8.J.Documents:8.K.Documents:8.L.Documents:8.M.Documents:8.N.Documents:8.O.Documents:9.10.10.A.Documents:11.11.A.Documents:11.B.Documents:11.C. Documents: 12. 13. MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: January 13, 2025 Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Jessica Jagoe, Interim City Administrator Julie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk SUBJECT: Oaths of Office Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: $ $ $ Council Should Consider Publicly recognizing the re-election of City Councilmember Brenda Holden and newly elected City Councilmember Kurt Weber. Background/Discussion On November 5, 2024, Councilmember Brenda Holden was re-elected to serve a four-year term (2025-2028) and Kurt Weber was elected to serve a four-year term (2025-2028). PUBLIC PRESENTATION – 5A Approved: January 13, 2025 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION DECEMBER 9, 2024 5:30 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor David Grant called to order the City Council Work Session at 5:30 p.m. Present: Mayor David Grant, Councilmembers Tom Fabel, Emily Rousseau, Brenda Holden, Tena Monson, Councilmember Elect Kurt Weber Absent: None Also present: Interim City Administrator Jessica Jagoe; Public Works Director/City Engineer David Swearingen; Finance Director Joua Yang and Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk Julie Hanson; Deputy Clerk Jen Estling Mayor Grant said Item C-Committee/Commissions Liaisons discussion will be moved to Item A and be discussed first. 1. PUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL None. 2. RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIES None. 3. AGENDA ITEMS A. Committee/Commissions Liaisons Mayor Grant read through the list of Committees and Commissions and requested that Councilmembers say if they are interested in serving on those Committees and Commissions. Parks, Trails & Recreation Committee (PTRC)-Councilmember Holden Economic Development Commission (EDC)-Councilmember Rousseau ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – DECEMBER 9, 2024 2 Planning Commission-Councilmember Elect Weber Communications-Councilmember Holden and Councilmember Rousseau Personnel-Mayor Grant, Councilmember Monson and Councilmember Rousseau Joint Development Authority (JDA)-Councilmember Monson and Councilmember Elect Weber Lake Johanna Fire Department-Councilmember Holden and Councilmember Monson Councilmember Monson said she doesn’t feel strongly about continuing but there is a lot happening on the Relief Association side. If the liaison changes, she is happy to help with the transition. Northeast Youth and Family Services (NYFS)-Councilmember Rousseau Ramsey County League-Councilmember Monson Councilmember Monson said she is primarily active through the Climate Action Working Group. There is a Board of Directors and other events she has not participated in. Twin Cities Gateway-Mayor Grant and Councilmember Rousseau Nine North-Councilmember Elect Weber Beyond the Yellow Ribbon-Military Liaison-Councilmember Monson Councilmember Monson has questions around Beyond the Yellow Ribbon and the Military Liaison role. Mayor Grant asked if Councilmember Monson has a Military background. Councilmember Monson said she has not been in the Military. She is not sure what Eileen Scott has been doing with Beyond the Yellow Ribbon. She remembers seeing one update in two years. She doesn’t fully understand the role and she thinks the Military Liaison role needs to have a more formalized communication pathway with a direct Councilmember that would then communicate any applicable information to the full Council. Councilmember Holden is on the Beyond the Yellow Ribbon and she said we do what Ramsey County tells us to do. Ramsey County is the main Beyond the Yellow Ribbon group. Councilmember Rousseau asked what the governance structure is of that group. She wondered if there is any risk to the City appointing someone. She asked if they are involved with the RAB meetings, as well. Councilmember Holden said they have nothing to do with the City, at all. They serve this area. When the Vets come home, they will have a dinner from them. It’s all run by the Ramsey County one. They will ask the North Suburban chapter what they need and then they will provide that. She said Ribfest is a Beyond the Yellow Ribbon event, but this chapter has nothing to do with Ribfest. Councilmember Monson said she doesn’t understand why the City would need to identify someone with Beyond the Yellow Ribbon. If we want to keep it, she would prefer it be a formal Military Liaison. She would like to separate the Military Liaison from the Beyond the Yellow Ribbon piece. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – DECEMBER 9, 2024 3 Councilmember Holden said it’s like the Kiwanis Club or the Lions Club. They aren’t associated with the City. They are just in the City. Councilmember Monson asked why it gets a special spot. Councilmember Holden said there was never a city liaison there, until 2023. Councilmember Monson asked what the City’s role is. Councilmember Holden thought maybe it would be advertising and communications. Councilmember Monson said she is fine leaving it as long as the person actually communicates with Council on a regular basis. She doesn’t think there has been any communication. She thinks it’s a good mission. She would love to have the City continue to have a partnership. She just thinks the formal Military Liaison should be separate from that group. With the Red Bulls being in town, she thinks we should have a Councilmember who has that formal communication line. Councilmember Holden said they don’t want one. Councilmember Monson would like to go ask them. Councilmember Holden said we talked to them last time and that’s why there is no position. They prefer to keep it clean from the City. They are willing to share communications with us but they don’t want regular meetings or City interactions. They are there to do a service. Councilmember Monson asked what the Military Liaison means. It is labeled with Beyond the Yellow Ribbon. Councilmember Holden said it was added when the new Councilmembers were elected because Councilmember Monson wanted to be the Military Liaison. Former City Administrator Perrault checked with them. They were not interested in having a formal liaison. The City is the City and Army is the Army. She said the title stayed on the list. Councilmember Monson would like to ask again or formalize a line of communication with them. If that’s through City Staff and they can communicate it. When there are events for the Red Bulls we would have a clear indication of if there is an invite to be shared and to determine the City’s role, as it relates to the City. Councilmember Fabel said he concurs that there should be a relationship between the City and the Military, whether they are interested in it, or not. We are so intimately connected, as neighbors and with the ongoing TCAAP property. He thinks having an open line of communication with them would be smart. Councilmember Holden said Senior Communications Coordinator Cardona communicates with them all the time. Councilmember Rousseau would be interested to hear when deployments are ending. She would want to hear about any events to welcome them back. She got a communication that the Governor was going to be at the last Veteran’s event. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – DECEMBER 9, 2024 4 Mayor Grant thinks Staff could be assigned to make sure Council is aware of such events. Councilmember Holden said the problem is that people get deployed all the time. They have a communication person, then that person gets deployed. Then you don’t know who to contact. Everyone is moving all the time so there’s not going to be just one person. Mayor Grant asked if Council would like to assign Staff to be in charge of Military communications. Councilmember Monson is fine with that but asks that Staff determine if this can continue to be a Staff item or if it is better to have a Councilmember or elected official there. Mayor Grant said he will note Staff will be the contact for Beyond the Yellow Ribbon. And requests that Staff communicate all Military items to Council. Councilmember Holden said someone brought up RAB. She said the Military Liaison should have nothing to do with RAB. We are all stakeholders in RAB. If anyone wants to go to a RAB meeting, they can. Mayor Grant agreed. He said that’s not on the list. Karth Lake Improvement District-Does not want a liaison. Councilmember Rousseau asked if Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen is okay with that. Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen confirmed he’s okay with that. Councilmember Rousseau wanted to bring up the North Metro Mayors group. She asked if Mayor Grant has spoken to them before. Mayor Grant did some research on the group and they seem to be a lobbying organization. Councilmember Rousseau could see why he would think that, in some aspects. They range from Andover to Shoreview and New Brighton. She thought this might be a way to form connections. The next meeting is January 15. She asked if Mayor Grant would be willing to attend a meeting and check them out. Mayor Grant said the handout provided is the Legislative Action Plan. This group bands together for legislative action. Councilmember Rousseau said their mission isn’t printed on this handout. The mission is to champion the North Metro, encouraging private and public investments. The purpose is research and advocating for services. Mayor Grant will check them out. He isn’t sure if it is an organization that you have to fund. He thinks you do. Council can have a discussion regarding North Metro Mayors and decide if we want to do anything with it, in the future. He pointed to the list for tonight’s discussion. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – DECEMBER 9, 2024 5 Councilmember Holden said her issue is all of the sudden Arden Hills will be out there lobbying for a bridge in Brookly Center. It would take away if we are lobbying for trail money. Councilmember Rousseau recognizes she handed out the Legislative Action Plan but she wanted to show how they come together to talk about other things. They have lobbyists like the MN Cable Communications Association. She thought it would be a great way to build some connections. Mayor Grant said he will check it out. He doesn’t think it’s something to jump into right now. He agrees with Councilmember Holden regarding our lobbying efforts. Our lobbyists are our Representative and our Senator. He would guess this organization puts all sorts of Representatives and Senators on their invite list. Councilmember Rousseau asked about the Mayor Pro Tem position. Mayor Grant said we do need to assign that, as well. Councilmember Monson said she would be find holding that. Councilmember Holden stated she would like to be considered for that. Mayor Grant said everyone knows what they have just volunteered for. He gave Council the opportunity to add or remove their names from any assignment on the list. He ran through the list again. The Council Liaison for PTRC will be Councilmember Holden. Councilmember Holden said Councilmember Elect Weber is the former Chair of the Planning Commission. She is concerned with the former Chair being the Council Liaison. He knows everyone and she is concerned that might influence the people on the Commission. Councilmember Elect Weber doesn’t expect it to be an issue. Everyone on the Commission is pretty individually minded. Mayor Grant said there are two ways to look at it. On one hand, he could get experience somewhere else in the organization, but on the other hand he would bring his experience to the Commission. The Council Liaison for Planning Commission will be Councilmember Elect Weber. The Council Liaison for EDC will be Councilmember Rousseau. Mayor Grant said both Councilmember Holden and Councilmember Rousseau have volunteered. He asked how to proceed. Councilmember Holden said he should finish reading the list. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – DECEMBER 9, 2024 6 Mayor Grant repeated that he along with Councilmember Monson and Councilmember Rousseau want Personnel. Councilmember Monson and Councilmember Elect Weber want JDA. Councilmember Monson and Councilmember Holden want Lake Johanna Fire Department. Councilmember Rousseau wants NYFS. Councilmember Monson wants Ramsey County League. Councilmember Rousseau and Mayor Grant want Twin Cities Gateway. Councilmember Elect Weber wants the Cable Commission Nine North. Councilmember Monson wants Beyond the Yellow Ribbon. Councilmember Monson said she was less about being on Beyond the Yellow Ribbon and more about ensuring that Council has a clear communication line with the Military. Mayor Grant asked if Eileen Scott would still be the contact. Councilmember Monson isn’t sure what her role is. Mayor Grant said we could invite her to a meeting. Councilmember Holden said Eileen Scott supplied the last annual report to Council, not too long ago, through the Admin Update. Councilmember Rousseau said we could ask her to send another one for this year and ask her to share the governance and bylaws with us. We could get a better understanding about how this process works. Mayor Grant said Mayor Pro Tem is also on the list. He asked how Council would like to move forward. Councilmember Rousseau said she would remove her name from Personnel Committee, to make it easier. Mayor Grant said in regard to Twin Cities Gateway, we have assigned John Connelly and we are allowed two positions. He asked if we want to remove John Connelly. Councilmember Rousseau said that’s fine. She is interested because if she were the EDC Liaison she would like to make sure there is more awareness between the two organizations. She wants to see what we could do with the grant that they have. Mayor Grant said there are very specific guidelines for what we can do with that money. Councilmember Rousseau meant she wanted to see what can be done with the organization, in general. Councilmember Monson asked if there is a concern about putting two Councilmembers back in. Mayor Grant couldn’t remember what the bylaws are. Interim City Administrator Jagoe will get the information and provide it to Council. She tried to find the information while Council continued the discussion. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – DECEMBER 9, 2024 7 Councilmember Monson said she would be willing to discuss the Fire Department assignment, in depth, outside of the meeting with Councilmember Holden. Councilmember Holden said she was on the Commission for eight years, before Councilmember Monson took it for two years. Councilmember Monson said she understands that Councilmember Holden has experience on the Commission. Her comment was mostly a friendly courtesy that if Councilmember Holden takes it that she understands the efforts that have happened over the past two years which have been time-consuming and not particularly easy. She just wanted to forewarn what she is signing up for. Councilmember Holden talks regularly with the representative from North Oaks. Mayor Grant continued the list. He said Councilmember Holden and Councilmember Rousseau are interested in Communications. He thinks it’s appropriate to have just one. Councilmember Monson prefers zero. She would rather not have any Councilmembers on the Communications Committee. She doesn’t believe Councilmembers should be involved in the newsletter. Councilmember Elect Weber said he can support that. Councilmember Holden asked who Council would ask if they want to see something in the newsletter. She has made suggestions in the past and that information did not make it to the newsletter. She wonders who she should follow up on those topics. She asked would it have to be discussed at a work session. Councilmember Monson thinks yes. Staff would have more autonomy to decide what goes in there. If they are uncertain about something they can ask Council. Interim City Administrator Jagoe believes prior to there being a liaison, everything ran through the Communications Coordinator. A list of topics could be sent out in advance of each issue. Mayor Grant said Senior Communications Coordinator Cardona is the first full time Communications Staff. There isn’t a lot of history. Prior to having a Staff Person dedicated, it was run by residents with Council. He’s fine with having zero. Councilmember Monson said Council can ask Senior Communications Coordinator Cardona to provide a proposal for how it could work. Mayor Grant said Councilmember Monson and himself are on the list for the Personnel Committee. Mayor Grant said the JDA takes two representatives. Councilmember Monson and Councilmember Elect Weber will be the reps. Mayor Grant said there is one position on the Lake Johanna Fire Board. Councilmember Holden and Councilmember Monson have expressed interest. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – DECEMBER 9, 2024 8 Councilmember Monson said other cities split the Fire Board and the Relief Association. She asked if Councilmember Holden would be open to that. Councilmember Holden said she does not want the relief. Councilmember Monson is happy to take the Relief Association if Councilmember Holden will take the Fire Board spot. Councilmember Holden agreed. Mayor Grant said NYFS is Councilmember Rousseau. Mayor Grant said Ramsey County League is Councilmember Monson. Mayor Grant asked if we know how many spots are on Twin Cities Gateway. Interim City Administrator Jagoe said she was unable to find that information. She will have to follow up with Council regarding what their bylaws say. Councilmember Monson said if we can have two on there that would be great. Mayor Grant thought it may be a two-year term and the second person has to be a Hotelier. If there is no representative from our hotels who wants to serve, then we can have another representative. So he believes it is just one. That is why John Connelly was on there. Councilmember Monson said we can wait until we learn what the bylaws say to decide. Councilmember Rousseau said she would still like to serve on this committee. She would like to learn a lot more about the organization. Councilmember Holden said anyone can attend the meetings. You don’t have to be a member on the board. You can just go. Mayor Grant would like to continue with that organization. It might be a two-year term. Interim City Administrator Jagoe will follow up and update Council before the January 13th meeting. Councilmember Elect Weber asked when the next meeting will be. Mayor Grant said it will be December 18th. Councilmember Elect Weber asked if it’s a monthly meeting. Mayor Grant said it is a quarterly meeting. Councilmember Elect Weber said it won’t be an issue to wait for the information. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – DECEMBER 9, 2024 9 Council agreed. Mayor Grant said Steve Scott has been on the Nine North Cable Commission for a couple years. He asked Councilmember Elect Weber what his interest is in serving on this Commission. Councilmember Elect Weber said he works in telecommunications for a living. He noticed that all of the Directors are elected members. He thinks Arden Hills should be represented by an elected official. Councilmember Holden said it wasn’t always that way. Mayor Grant said that could be coincidence. Councilmember Elect Weber said he is still interested in serving on the Commission. Mayor Grant said that Councilmember Holden and Councilmember Monson have expressed interest in Mayor Pro Tem. He read from the list what each has already signed up for. Councilmember Monson said the Mayor Pro Tem role isn’t like a liaison role. Mayor Grant agreed. Councilmember Rousseau said she would join the Personnel Committee if there is a concern about Councilmember Monson’s work load. Councilmember Monson pointed out that Councilmember Rousseau only has the EDC and potentially TC Gateway. She would be fine with giving Personnel to Councilmember Rousseau. Council agreed. Mayor Grant said Mayor Pro Tem is left to be decided. He said we don’t vote during work sessions but Council needs to come to a consensus. Councilmember Elect Weber said he would support Councilmember Monson in that role. Councilmember Rousseau said she thinks Councilmember Monson did a nice job, when it was necessary. She supports her continuing. Councilmember Monson wants it because it gives her the potential opportunity to preside over a meeting. She pointed out that Mayor Grant is rarely absent. Councilmember Holden said it is three. Mayor Grant said he will put it down as 3-2. Councilmember Monson asked if he put the rest down as 5-0. If we’re counting votes, let’s make sure all of them are counted. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – DECEMBER 9, 2024 10 Mayor Grant said the only outstanding appointment is TC Gateway. That will be decided once we see the bylaws. B. Recycling Services RFP/Contract Discussion Deputy Clerk Estling said the memo outlined that Republic services did not extend our Residential Recycling contract so an RFP was released. The Selection Committee unanimously chose Walters Recycling and Refuse. Staff is seeking direction if Council prefers a 3-year or 5- year contract. Mayor Grant said he wants 5-years. Mike Person from Walters Recycling joined the discussion. Councilmember Holden asked about the fleet vehicle inventory outlined in Walters’ proposal. She asked what vehicles would be used in Arden Hills. She said the proposal said they are in the middle of a conversion. She would prefer to have vehicles that are already converted. She wondered it we have a say. Mike Person said the trucks to be used in Arden Hills have not been specified yet. That can be discussed during the negotiations. Walters is moving toward Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) powered engines for environmental emissions. Councilmember Holden asked what the conversion timeline is. Mike Person doesn’t have the exact timeline. All vehicles will be converted. He can get back to Council with a more specific date. Councilmember Holden would prefer to have the converted fleet used in Arden Hills. She asked about the pricing. She asked if there would be gas surcharges or any other surprises that will cause the costs to be more than what is proposed. Mike Person said no. The price is transparent. That is what it will be. Councilmember Holden asked if we want a clean up day what that would entail. Mike Person said they are open to exploring that. They have partnered with other cities and they have seen them run a couple different ways. They are in communication with all residents so they are aware. They can specify a day and they can have trucks drive to get the items, curbside. They have also done an event where residents bring their items to a City designated location where their staff would be available for a one stop drop. Councilmember Holden pointed to the pricing in the proposal. She asked if we would pay for labor, equipment and the recyclables at a one stop drop event. Mike Person said that would be an all-encompassing, contracted rate for Walters to participate in that kind of event. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – DECEMBER 9, 2024 11 Councilmember Holden asked if it would be less if they did the curbside pickup. She is trying to figure out what pieces go with what. If they drive around and pick up, we wouldn’t be charged all of the fees outlined. Mike Person confirmed. He said it would depend on what type of event. If the City chose to do a curbside bulky waste pick up, it would be the $95.00/hour. Councilmember Holden wanted confirmation that it would be $95.00/hour and they would drive around, pick it up and we’re done. Mike Person said there would be a fee associated with the individual items they collected. Councilmember Holden asked if the City or the homeowner would be charged. Mike Person said they have done it both ways. It will depend on how the contract is laid out. They can collect the bulk payments from the individual. They do have the option to bill the City if that is the preference. Mayor Grant asked about Walters’ bulky waste contract with Blaine. He said the residents in Blaine are allowed six items per year. Mike Person confirmed. Mayor Grant asked if that was included in the Contract. Mike Person confirmed. He said that was included in the Contract. Mayor Grant asked for confirmation that they are proposing something entirely different for Arden Hills. Mike Person said they are moving to one item. Residents can also drop items off at the transfer station in Blaine. More residents participate in that option. Councilmember Holden said you can go to the Ramsey County site and get rid of refrigerators, air conditioners for $10. Mayor Grant thought that was a tech dump. He doesn’t think you can bring a mattress there. Councilmember Holden thinks you can. She is trying to determine what it would cost to host a clean up event. We will need to budget for that. Mike Person could bring back some more exact figures, if that is the type of event the City is interested in. He can break it down from a budgetary standpoint to host one or two events a year. Councilmember Holden said if it were a curbside event we wouldn’t know what the charge is because the City would have to bill the resident. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – DECEMBER 9, 2024 12 Mike Person said typically for that type of event the resident would pay them directly. The resident would call to say what is being picked up. Walters would collect payment. Then a truck would be scheduled to collect those items from that address. Mayor Grant said a mattress is $65. Would it be $65 plus the $95? Mike Person said no. The price is what’s on the list. If it is on the list as $65, it would just be $65. If it were a coordinated day where residents could just put things at the curb, it would include the hourly rate for the driver. Single pick ups are paid by item. Interim City Administrator Jagoe said the RFP outlined the bulky item pick up as an optional bid. The draft contract language does not include the bulky item collection. We will work with the City Attorney to see what additional language we should add and work with Walters to get the final pricing, specific to a drop off vs. curbside pick up event. Mayor Grant asked when the new contract was signed with Blaine and how long the contract is. Mike Person thought it was in July. He didn’t know the exact date. It is a 5-year contract. Councilmember Holden said all of the garbage haulers allow for a bulky pick-up. She doesn’t think that’s necessary in the contract. Mike Person thought this was geared toward recyclable materials. Councilmember Holden pointed out that a mattress is not recyclable but it’s on the list. Mike Person said it is offered to their trash customers. They were trying to identify that we currently provide this service for customers. Walters is open to discuss making this more of a comprehensive program. Councilmember Monson said the intent was to learn what a large city-wide event could look like. She outlined the pricing. If it were a one-day, curbside pick up event it would be the hourly rate plus the cost of the picked-up item. If everyone brought the items to one location it would be the $75/hour plus the cost of the items dropped off. Mike Person confirmed. Councilmember Monson said we would need to set a budget for how much we’re willing to take or we just take in the items. It would be hard to budget for. She would like to understand better what it would cost. She requested comparable numbers from other cities, in terms of items collected and the cost. She asked about the portion of the memo that says the rates are not reflective of the administration costs that are also assessed. Deputy Clerk Estling said on top of the individual rate, there is a formula to calculate the administrative cost for City Staff. Councilmember Rousseau asked if they are fixed. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – DECEMBER 9, 2024 13 Deputy Clerk Estling confirmed. Once they are calculated, that will be the rate that is assessed to the residents. Councilmember Rousseau asked if the other bidders included administrative costs. Deputy Clerk Estling clarified that the administrative fees are City fees to cover Staff time. Councilmember Rousseau is interested in a 5-year contract. She would also like to explore a clean-up day. She would be happy if it included trash and recycling. Mayor Grant said he is looking for a 5-year contract because he doesn’t want to go through this whole process again in three years. He said Staff needs to get decent terms. If we don’t get that, we go 3-year. Councilmember Holden, Councilmember Monson and Councilmember Fabel would all like a 5-year contract. Councilmember Holden asked if there was an option to extend. Mike Person said he believes there are one or two 2-year extensions. Councilmember Holden would like an extension built in. She asked about the educational portion. She asked who pays for that. Mike Person said that will be Walters’ cost. They want to make sure the City has eyes on the materials that will be sent to residents and knows when those items will be sent. Councilmember Holden asked how many educational pieces are required. Interim City Administrator Jagoe will verify that. Some of it ties into the SCORE grant. She verified there are extensions in the draft contract language. Councilmember Fabel asked what the advantage is to the City in owning our own carts. Mayor Grant said there is less expense if the City owns them. He just met with another City’s Mayor and they are going to purchase their own carts. It’s quite a savings. He asked who is responsible for upkeep on carts. Interim City Administrator Jagoe said it is part of the contract that Walters will maintain and repair existing carts. Mayor Grant said the resident has to call the recycler directly. C. Freeway Park Landscape Barrier Discussion Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen said this discussion will center on the proposed barrier at Freeway Park. The City received a donation from the Lion’s Club in the amount of $15,000. Council directed Staff to put that donation towards this feature. It would divide the park from the on-ramp on MN 51. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – DECEMBER 9, 2024 14 Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen said Bolton and Menk provided a few options. The first is a simple native planting on the hillside area. The second option would be to plant trees, such as evergreens or arborvitaes. Option three would be to install some type of split- rail fence. He asked which direction Council would like to go. Councilmember Rousseau likes Option 2. She thinks a split rail fence is fun to climb and having some closed evergreens would be more of a deterrent to keep kids away from that area. She also likes the more natural barrier. Councilmember Holden had the same thought regarding the split fence. She asked how close it would be to the on ramp. Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen said it would be on the lower portion of the hill. There is MN-Dot Right of Way there so it would be more on the City’s property line. Councilmember Holden said some residents have expressed concern about kids chasing a ball. It would be great to have evergreens, but that won’t stop a kicked ball. She thinks a fence will offer more safety. Councilmember Fabel said split rail fences are a lot of work. He strongly recommends against that type of fence. Councilmember Monson asked why they didn’t propose chain link. Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen said these are the options Bolton and Menk provided. It could be a different kind of fence. Councilmember Monson would love to have native planting or trees but she thinks a chain link fence is a better option. She thought maybe some trees could be planted in front of the fence. Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen said that when the donation was made, there was direction to put it towards landscaping, natural barrier. There could be a combination. Councilmember Monson would like to see those options. Councilmember Rousseau asked if they can install the chain link fence that could be removed when the trees mature. Like a 10-year plan. Councilmember Holden said there will still be kids kicking balls. Two-year-olds can walk under pine trees. Councilmember Monson thinks there could be a plan to decommission the fence if repairs are needed and the trees are sufficient for the barrier. Councilmember Holden said a vinyl fence would last longer. Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen said that would add to the expense. A chain link fence is at or above what the split rail fence is. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – DECEMBER 9, 2024 15 Councilmember Monson likes the landscaping but thinks the money should go towards an actual barrier. She wants to make sure the barrier is effective. Mayor Grant likes the idea of landscaping but thinks a chain link fence would be effective. He wondered if our employees would install it. Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen said it would be a contract to install it. Mayor Grant said our people could install it, they have the skills to do that. He is basing that on the fact that he put in his own. That could bring down the cost. Councilmember Monson asked if it has to be six feet tall or would a four-foot fence create enough of a barrier. She said that could make the project cheaper. Councilmember Holden said it’s for the little kids running. She wondered if the correctional people could install the fence. That would save money. Mayor Grant agreed. He thinks an upgrade to vinyl is appropriate. Chain link gets rusty. Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen asked if the Council prefers vinyl over chain link. Councilmember Rousseau said get rid of the split rail fence and look at what a vinyl fence would cost vs. chain link. Mayor Grant stated when he talks about vinyl, he means a vinyl coated chain link fence. Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen said he has what he needs. D. JDA Chair Discussion Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk Hanson stated that Jonathan Wicklund is the current JDA Chair. His term expires at the end of this year. She asked if Council would like to go through a formal recruitment process to fill the two-year term or would they like to reappoint Jonathan Wicklund. He has expressed interest in continuing in that role. Councilmember Fabel said Jonathan Wicklund does an excellent job. He is reliable, steady and well organized. He runs a nice meeting. Keeping him in his role offers some continuity for the JDA that will be losing three members. His experience will be very useful and he recommends reappointment. Councilmember Holden said she was disappointed about how many meetings he missed this year. We’ve had big change over before. Even with missing three people. She thinks it is nice to have a new point of view. There has been a different chair every two years and each of those people brought something unique to the position. It would be her preference to recruit to fill the position with a new person. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – DECEMBER 9, 2024 16 Councilmember Monson doesn’t have any complaints about him. She agrees with Councilmember Holden it is nice to have new people come in with new ideas. She said that Chair Wicklund won’t be on the Planning Commission anymore, so he’ll have more time. She thinks he is attuned to the value he brings. If he didn’t believe he can bring value to the role, she thinks he would step down. She supports him continuing. Mayor Grant said the turnover on JDA could be looked at one of two ways. Either it’s an advantage to maintain consistency or it’s an advantage to bring in new blood. He knows Chair Wicklund missed several meetings. He would be in favor of opening it up to applications. Councilmember Rousseau said she has seen him on the Planning Commission. She thinks he does a good job. He’s very thoughtful. He does a nice job with JDA, as well. He has made some decisions to down scope some of his volunteer commitments so he can focus on more critical areas, specifically the JDA. When communications went down a few years ago, he spent time thinking about how things could be done better. She is in favor of him being reappointed to another term. Mayor Grant asked Councilmember Monson if she was in favor or reappointment or recruiting someone new, as she spoke in favor of both options. Councilmember Monson said she is in favor of him returning. She wanted to highlight Councilmember Holden’s idea about a new person bring new ideas. Her thoughts on Jonathan Wicklund are, he is very aware of the value he brings. And if he thought he didn’t bring value any more, he would be aware of that and not seek reappointment. Mayor Grant said it appears to be a split decision, 3-2. He asked if Staff intended to bring the appointments to the January 13 meeting. Interim City Administrator Jagoe confirmed. Mayor Grant said at that time Councilmember Elect Weber can vote how he chooses. E. Rice Creek Commons/TCAAP Discussion Mayor Grant proposed that any Rice Creek Commons discussion happen at the Regular Council Meeting. Councilmember Fabel thinks the only question is whether there will be another Special City Council meeting on the 16th. Interim City Administrator Jagoe confirmed a meeting has been scheduled for December 16th. That meeting would discuss the term sheet and would not be televised. She updated that the schedule for Stacie Kvilvang has changed and she is no longer able to be at that meeting. She asked if Council would like to still have that discussion on the 16th. She forwarded the last for the JDA regarding where the County is at, with the PSA. There have not been any additional discussions with Alatus regarding the red lines we received previously. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – DECEMBER 9, 2024 17 F. Agenda Planning Interim City Administrator Jagoe She asked if Council is open to use the December 16th date to schedule a Special Regular City Council meeting. She has received information from the Union so there could potentially be a Union Contract for approval. The JDA Chair appointment could be on the agenda, as well. There are enough items to discuss, but at a minimum she wants the Union Contract approved. Mayor Grant said there could be any number of items on the agenda. If we don’t get to all the topics, that is okay. He thinks we should respond to the Term Sheet red lines as a Council. He wouldn’t want to wait until after any sale deal with the County. Councilmember Holden doesn’t think we should do the Term Sheet until we know the County has an agreement with them. It doesn’t make sense to discuss the Term Sheet before we know what their agreement is. The issue is the Term Sheet is a proposal on how we are moving forward so it may be null and void, depending on that agreement. Councilmember Monson agreed. She thinks the Term Sheet discussion should take place after we know if the County agrees to the PSA. She also thinks Stacie Kvilvang is essential to the discussion and should be there for any discussion on the Term Sheet. Mayor Grant said Stacie Kvilvang should take what Council decisions are, potentially run the numbers, but have her sit through a meeting and listen to what our preferences are. Councilmember Monson said she was pretty active in the last meeting. Mayor Grant doesn’t think it’s to our advantage to have her in the meeting. We know what the numbers are. Councilmember Rousseau asked if there will be a meeting on December 23rd. Mayor Grant said there is not a meeting on December 23rd. Councilmember Rousseau asked when we would need the union information. Interim City Administrator Jagoe said we have already provided them the response. They have taken the vote. We should be ready to bring something forth on December 16th. Councilmember Rousseau and Councilmember Monson are okay with using December 16th for Union Discussion. Mayor Grant agreed. He said Council had December 16th as a place holder, so it makes sense to use that meeting time for this item. He will work with Staff regarding what else may be on that agenda. It could also be planned to be a short meeting. Councilmember Monson would be fine with a short meeting. Councilmember Rousseau would like to have Council use January and February to knock off some of the longstanding topics. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – DECEMBER 9, 2024 18 Councilmember Holden thinks Legislative Priorities should be discussed in January. Councilmember Rousseau wondered if the December meeting was too early to discuss that. Interim City Administrator Jagoe said that might be a little early for Staff. Councilmember Holden thinks Staff should ask Council what they want. Mayor Grant said we need to have that discussion, whether Staff is ready or not. He thinks we should go forward with the force main. That packet is done, it hasn’t changed. The force main is still relevant. There may be some pricing changes. Councilmember Holden said her priority is the trail. Mayor Grant agreed. He said that one was ready for last year, too. The trail didn’t go away. There may be some pricing updates. He doesn’t think we need to swap that out. Those are the items Council asked for and we didn’t get them. He doesn’t think we want to bring three. Councilmember Holden wants to look at the trail one again. She said some grants were received, it’s possible we could reduce the amount we are asking for to be considered favorably. Mayor Grant said there aren’t a lot of verbiage changes needed. Interim City Administrator Jagoe asked for clarification that Council would like to add Legislative Updates to the December 16th meeting. Mayor Grant confirmed, as well as the Union negotiation item. Councilmember Monson asked if it will be a Special Council Meeting or a Special Work Session. Interim City Administrator Jagoe said she is requesting a Special City Council Meeting because Council will have to vote on the Union Contract. 4. COUNCIL COMMENTS AND STAFF UPDATES None. ADJOURN Mayor Grant adjourned the City Council Work Session at 6:55 p.m. __________________________ __________________________ Jennifer Estling David Grant Deputy Clerk Mayor Approved: January 13, 2025 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 9, 2024 7:00 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor David Grant called to order the regular City Council meeting at 7:00 p.m. Present: Mayor David Grant, Councilmembers, Brenda Holden, Tena Monson, Tom Fabel and Emily Rousseau Absent: None Also present: Interim City Administrator Jessica Jagoe; Public Works Director/City Engineer David Swearingen; Finance Director Joua Yang; and Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk Julie Hanson PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Councilmember Holden requested Item 8L be pulled from the Consent Agenda for discussion as Item 9A. MOTION: Councilmember Monson moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a motion to approve the meeting agenda as amended. The motion carried (5-0). 2. TCAAP/RICE CREEK COMMONS UPDATE Interim City Administrator Jagoe stated the JDA met on December 2nd. County staff provided an update on the status of the PSA with Alatus. The original LOI from Alatus was presented to the County on July 31st. Since that time, the County and Alatus have been exchanging comments, and the LOI was turned into a PSA as drafted by the County Attorney. During September and October, the County shared that they had not received comments back from Alatus on the PSA terms. Before Thanksgiving, the County requested from Alatus a schedule for achieving the milestones necessary to get to a Final Development Agreement by June 30, 2025, per the terms of the Preliminary Development Agreement. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – DECEMBER 9, 2024 2 County staff informed the JDA that they had received an LOI from Alatus that has a “new" terms structure. It was communicated that this new structure would be with Alatus finding private financing for mass grading and the County would transfer the land to Alatus and then they would do private financing of the mass grading versus County bonding and public funding for the mass grading. The County Board held a closed session on December 3rd to review this new structure and discussions continue on potential PSA terms. Additionally, County staff noted there is a tentative placeholder for an agenda item at the County Board meeting on December 17th. Also from the JDA discussion, Jenny Boulton, the JDA Attorney, provided an update on the PDA terms which includes language to have reached substantial agreement as to the terms of the final DA by October 31, 2024. She reviewed the notice details should substantial progress have not been made and noted that neither party has issued that notice. Following these updates, the JDA has tentatively scheduled a Special Work Session on December 20th at 4 PM to hear updates on the PSA and discuss the terms of the PDA. Councilmember Monson discussed the events that occurred at the last JDA meeting noting the JDA was made fully aware of the preliminary development agreement notice. She indicated if the JDA were to give notice, there would be a 30-day period where additional negotiations could be made to try and reach substantial progress. She commented the JDA would be holding a special meeting on December 20 in order to be able to respond quickly in the event the County does not approve the purchase and sale agreement on December 17. Councilmember Fabel commented the developer has worked very hard to overcome the financial problems which were created by the long delay of this project. He noted this led to tremendous increases in interest rates and construction costs which has thrown a substantial monkey wrench in moving this project forward. He indicated the proposed private financing for the mass grading would help the County’s reluctance to inject bonding funds into the development and creates a level of hopefulness for him. He stated the next couple of weeks would be critically important for this project. Councilmember Holden stated this was the same action that happened to the long delay when Alatus did not come forward with any agreement with the County. She understood the financial costs have gone up, along with the cost for the land given the delays. 3. PUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL Ed Dickinson, 3188 Asbury Avenue, stated a section of Old Snelling from Trunk Highway 51 to County Road E had a 40 mile per hour limit and for much of that time the road was in a deteriorated condition. He reported this section of roadway has been completely resurfaced and a curbed walkway was created for pedestrians. However, at this time, the speed limit was lowered to 25 miles per hour. He indicated this roadway runs through an uncongested area where houses along the roadway were set well back. He recommended the 25 mile per hour speed limit be reconsidered and changed back to 40 miles per hour as this would be more in synch with the area north of the roundabout. Steve Scott, 4286 Norma Avenue, thanked the Council for the Christmas card that was sent to his address. He explained 10 months ago there was a large deployment ceremony for the 34th Infantry Division known as the Red Bulls. He indicated this impacted 574 soldiers that were sent to the ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – DECEMBER 9, 2024 3 Middle East. He was pleased to report he just learned these soldiers would be returning sometime this week. He reported the soldiers were not interested in a welcome home ceremony as they wanted to get home to their families for the holidays, but he recommended the City post a comment on social media welcoming home these soldiers. Councilmember Monson supported this recommendation. 4. RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIES None. 5. PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS None. 6. STAFF COMMENTS None. 7. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. November 7, 2024, Special City Council Work Session B. November 12, 2024, City Council Work Session C. November 12, 2024, Regular City Council D. November 18, 2024, Special City Council Work Session MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Rousseau seconded a motion to approve the November 7, 2024, Special City Council Work Session meeting minutes as amended, the November 12, 2024, City Council Work Session meeting minutes as presented, the November 12, 2024, Regular City Council meeting minutes as amended; and the November 18, 2024, Special City Council Work Session meeting minutes as amended. The motion carried (5-0). 8. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Motion to Approve Consent Agenda Item - Claims and Payroll B. Motion to Approve the 2025 Non-Union Employee Compensation Plan C. Motion to Approve Resolution 2024-056 – 2025 City Contribution to Employee Monthly Benefits D. Motion to Approve Northeast Youth and Family Services 2025 Agreement E. Motion to Approve Planning Case 24-009 – Lake Johnanna Fire Department Development Agreement F. Motion to Approve Ordinance 2024-016 Approving the 2025 Fee Schedule and Authorizing Publication of a Summary Ordinance G. Motion to Approve 2025 Liquor License Renewals H. Motion to Approve 2025 Tobacco License Renewals ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – DECEMBER 9, 2024 4 I. Motion to Approve Ordinance 2024-017 Amending Chapter 3 Related to Adult Cannabis Retail Business Registrations and Cannabis Events and Authorizing Publication of a Summary Ordinance J. Motion to Approve Cancellation of the December 23, 2024 City Council Work Session and Regular Meeting K. Motion to Approve Cancellation of the January 27, February 24 and March 24, 2025 City Council Regular Meetings and Work Sessions L. Motion to Approve Agreement for Professional Services for Public Works Support Services – Engineering, Parks, MS4 and GIS – Bolton & Menk M. Motion to Approve Resolution 2024-057 – Application for Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) for 2025 Private Inflow and Infiltration (I/I) Grant Program N. Motion to Approve Resolution 2024-058 Authorizing the City to Submit a 2024 MnDOT Safe Routes to School Infrastructure Grant Application O. Motion to Approve Resolution 2024-061 Approving Plans and Specifications and Ordering Advertisement for Bids – South Tower Improvement Project MOTION: Councilmember Monson moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a motion to approve the Consent Calendar as amended and to authorize execution of all necessary documents contained therein. The motion carried (5-0). 9. PULLED CONSENT ITEMS A. Motion to Approve Agreement for Professional Services for Public Works Support Services – Engineering, Parks, MS4 and GIS – Bolton & Menk Councilmember Holden recommended the budget be passed prior to this item being considered. She suggested this item be moved to Unfinished Business. Mayor Grant noted the Council had already approved the agenda and items are not typically moved after the agenda was approved. Councilmember Holden commented she could move to table action on this item. MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Mayor Grant seconded a motion to table action on this item. The motion carried 3-2 (Councilmembers Fabel and Rousseau opposed). 10. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Truth-in-Taxation Hearing Finance Director Yang provided the Council with a presentation on the 2025 budget and tax levy. She explained budget discussions were held with the Council in August and September. Council adopted a maximum tax levy increase of 15.50% on September 23, 2024. Another budget workshop was held with the Council on November 12, 2024. She described why tax bills change for property owners. She provided a summary of the General Fund budget and reviewed the revenues and expenditures in further detail. She reviewed the City’s past tax levies and discussed ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – DECEMBER 9, 2024 5 how the proposed tax levy compared to other cities in Ramsey County. She commented on the resources available for property tax relief. Staff discussed how the median value home would be impacted by the proposed tax levy and asked for comments or questions from the Council. Councilmember Holden asked what percent Public Safety was of the overall budget. Finance Director Yang stated Public Safety made up 46% of the overall budget. Mayor Grant opened the Truth in Taxation public hearing at 7:36 p.m. Steve Erler, 1704 Chatham, spoke in support of the budget being considered by the Council, along with the 15.5% tax levy. He believed the Council has done all they could to come up with a reasonable balanced budget. He indicated the increase was justified due to increases in public safety expenditures and employee salaries. Brad Bjorklund, 3550 Ridgewood Court, stated he has served on the Planning Commission for several years now. He explained two years ago, the City Council let many weeds grow and allowed Rice Creek Commons to languish in weeds for 10 years, which cost every citizen in the community $400 in legal fees to no avail. He appreciated the fact Rice Creek Commons would now be developed thanks to the new City Council. He reported this development would enrich the community. He stated the City’s reputation of practicing institutional racism was enhanced by Councilmember Holden and Mayor Grant’s stance against the development of Rice Creek Commons, the lawsuit and the elimination of the Human Rights Commission. He believed the proposed budget and tax levy were a reflection of all the things Councilmember Holden and Mayor Grant let slide. He stated massive buckthorn weeds have taken over the City’s parks and a couple of City benches were not enough. He discussed how City employee wages have been neglected and employee happiness was being threatened. He stated no meaningful or substantial input has been received from Mayor Grant or Councilmember Holden on where cuts could be made to offset the need for this tax increase. He discussed how inaction was no longer a meaningful option. He believed the proposed tax increase was meaningful and he appreciated the Councilmember’s who supported it. Russell Bertsch, 4419 Amble Circle, stated this year’s proposed tax bill was a concern to him, especially given the double digit increase that occurred last year. He explained he wanted to understand why his property value goes up 2.5% and his taxes were proposed to increase 18%. He indicated this was outrageous. He stated his County taxes were slated to go up 7.2% as well. He believed an increase of $255 per year was excessive for the City. He encouraged the Council to consider how the levy increases were impacting residents because Arden Hills would no longer be affordable. He feared that the Council would be pricing people out of the housing market in Arden Hills. He asked that the Council consider this before approving another double-digit levy increase. He discussed how residents were making adjustments to their standard of living and suggested the Council take the same measures in order to reduce costs. Steve Scott, 4286 Norma Avenue, stated he has experience managing City finances and setting tax levies. He explained he was astounded by the callous nature of some of the members on the Council with respect to how they were approaching the proposed budget and tax levy. He encouraged the Council to truly consider how the proposed increase will impact residents. He stated Arden Hills was proposing the second highest tax levy increase in Ramsey County. He spoke on behalf of an elderly neighbor noting this resident has lived in Arden Hills for the past 40 ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – DECEMBER 9, 2024 6 years and hoped to age in place. This neighbor feared that she would not be able to remain in her home given how taxes were rising. He implored the Council to consider dialing back expenses on behalf of the residents. Gregg Larson, 3377 North Snelling Avenue, stated the City has a history of budgeting at the margin and racing to the bottom seeking a low levy. He indicated this was a meaningless chase because cities were not comparable. He discussed how cities differ based on the services they opt to provide or not provide. He commented on how Arden Hills on the cheap has underfunded its parks, delayed improvements for streets and trails, failed to save for a new fire station, has insufficient compensation for staff along with failure to budget for inflation. He noted past Council’s have done this with unbalanced budget and deficit spending. He reported the past strategies have not worked and five of the last seven years have resulted in general fund deficits, which leaves smaller carry over balances for the next year. He indicated previous Councilmembers Holmes and Scott recognized the problem in December of 2022. However, Mayor Grant and Councilmembers Holden and Raji were still racing for the bottom at 5.5%. He discussed how the chickens came home to roost in 2024 where a 12.55% levy increase was approved and Councilmember Holden and Mayor Grant voted against this. He discussed how Councilmember Holden predicted the City would end 2024 with a surplus, when in fact the City would be ending 2024 with a general fund deficit of $182,000. He explained staff was recommending a levy increase of 15.5% for 2025 and the majority of the Council was acting responsibly by offering support of this increase. He anticipated Councilmember Holden and Mayor Grant would act irresponsibly and would be voting against the proposed levy increase. He stated if the Council wants to lower the proposed levy, he recommended the Council speak to what expenses would be cut that would make a significant difference. Mary Henry, 3521 Ridgewood Court, stated she supported the proposed levy. She believed it took courage to face the reality of what the City was experiencing. She reported inflation was not the City’s fault but it was the City’s experience. She indicated it was important for the Council to recognize that when staff puts together the budget that it reflects increased costs for public safety, street maintenance costs, etc. She encouraged the Council to approve the proposed tax levy increase in order to continue to provide basic services for the residents of Arden Hills. Kris Shields, 1144 Karth Lake Drive, thanked the Council for their service to the community. She appreciated how Councilmember Holden and Mayor Grant had done their best in the past on the TCAAP development by not letting Ramsey County run all over the City. She thanked the Council for working to keep taxes reasonable and asked that the Council to work to reduce the proposed tax levy for those who live in the community that would like to age in place or are single parents. Mayor Grant closed the Truth in Taxation public hearing at 7:55 p.m. 11. NEW BUSINESS A. Adoption of the 2025 Budget and Tax Levy o Resolution 2024-059 Setting the Final Tax Levy for Taxes Payable in 2025 o Resolution 2025-060 Adopting the Proposed 2025 Budget Finance Director Yang reported this item was presented under Item 10A. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – DECEMBER 9, 2024 7 Councilmember Holden stated the public has spoken about how the City Council was substandardly paying its employees. She reviewed the market analysis, noting Arden Hills was at 90% to 105% for employee compensation, except for four staff members, which were at 80%. She explained these staff members received a three step increase along with an additional 3%. She explained she is deeply concerned about the fund balance target policy noting the auditor said the City was fine, but now the City was below the mark for 2023. Finance Director Yang explained the $9,000 extra was the operating activity for 2023, which meant revenues exceeded expenditures. However, she noted this dollar amount did not take into consideration the transfer that was approved in June of 2023 for the 2022 audit. She reported whenever an audit is completed, Council reviews the overall fund balance policy to determine whether or not the City has met the 50% fund balance policy. She commented the City had not met the 2023 fund balance policy as the City was at 47%,. Councilmember Holden questioned why the audit states the City was at 51%. Finance Director Yang stated she did not recall this being the case and restated the City was at 47%. Mayor Grant reported in previous meetings the transfers have been reviewed for past years. He noted revenues exceeded expenditures by over $9,000. He concurred with Councilmember Holden that the auditor stated the City had met the 50% threshold and he was surprised by the change. He asked if staff had done an analysis on where the City will end up this year. Finance Director Yang estimated the City would be underfunded by about $14,000 for 2024. Mayor Grant stated this was about as close as the City could get on its budget that had over $5 million in revenues and expenditures. He clarified for the record that the shortfall was not $182,000. Councilmember Fabel asked if the underfunding referred to the proposed increase of 15.5%. Finance Director Yang stated she was referring to the 2024 actuals. Councilmember Fabel questioned if staff had projections for 2025. Finance Director Yang reported in order to get to a balanced budget for 2025, the Council would have to approve a 15.5% levy increase. Councilember Fabel indicated the drivers for the levy increases were due to increases in public safety costs, CIP increases, and personnel costs. He recalled that every member of the City Council voted in favor of the CIP, contracts with the police and fire departments, along with the proposed personnel pay increases. Councilmember Holden stated this was the first time she was considering the budget for 2025. Councilmember Fabel recalled that these three items had come to the Council previously and the entire Council had offered their support. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – DECEMBER 9, 2024 8 Mayor Grant reported the Council had offered their support for the CIP, but noted the police and fire contracts were provided by staff and a vote was not taken. Councilmember Fabel commented on the lengthy discussions the Council had regarding the police and fire contracts, along with the discussions held regarding employee compensation. He stated at the end of the day, the entire Council voted to support the proposed changes. He indicated his second observation was that even with an increase of 15.5%, Arden Hills would have the second lowest tax rate (28.07%) in Ramsey County. He explained in 2017, the City was less than 1% of this tax rate (27.2%) and in 2022 the City’s tax rate was 26.5%. He discussed how the proposed increase would be similar to the tax rate that the City has had for years. Councilmember Rousseau stated it was disappointing that half of the cities in Ramsey County were considering a levy increase of 10% or higher. She indicated she did not know what the root cause of this was, but explained Arden Hills was looking at a 13% to 15.5% levy increase. Councilmember Holden commented the City overspent $100,000 on Ehler’s and legal expenses in 2024. She stated without this overage, the City’s budget would have come in with a net positive in revenues. She asked if the fire department pay increases were in the budget. Finance Director Yang reported these were included in the budget for 2025 and going forward. Councilmember Holden inquired if the Great River Greening increases were included in the budget. Finance Director Yang stated the CIP projects were included. Councilmember Holden inquired if the Public Works salary increases were included in the 2025 budget. Finance Director Yang reported this was the case, noting negotiations were still underway but a 3% COLA had been included. She explained she does not have the final salary numbers at this time but noted the insurance numbers were included. Interim City Administrator Jagoe reported the union contract has not been finalized, but estimated the pay increases for public works would be $25,000 to $30,000. Councilmember Monson commented on the general fund balances over the past eight years. She explained the general fund was the operating fund for most services the City offers. She indicated these activities were funded by tax dollars and permit fees. She stated this fund needs to be a healthy fund and should be keeping up with inflation. She discussed how the decreases in the general fund have led to a larger tax levy increase given how inflation and employee salaries were increasing. She described how over the years the City had not levied enough to meet expenditures. She noted incremental tax increases were necessary in order to avoid large tax increases. She believed when funding was transferred out, there needed to be better consideration of what levy expenditures truly were. She discussed how growing the tax base could assist with reducing taxes, which would occur once Rice Creek Commons began. She commented further on how the proposed increase was due to the fact only incremental increases were made to the levy over time and now as expenditures were rising the general fund did not have a balance to support these proposed increases. She reported this was not a new problem but rather staff has been ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – DECEMBER 9, 2024 9 speaking to the Council about the unsustainability of underfunding the budget and deficit spending. She indicated she would not continue with the unsustainability of the underfunding because she believed this was fiscally irresponsible. She supported keeping the budget balanced, while also keeping the general fund at a minimum with inflation. Mayor Grant asked why there was an asterisk on the 2024 general fund. Finance Director Yang reported this indicates the 2024 general fund was predicted as of the end of September. She commented she does have another projection as of the end of November that shows the City was approximately $14,000 short. Mayor Grant commented when looking across the years, the ending fund balances were around $3 million each year. He was of the opinion the City was doing pretty good meeting obligations and raising taxes in an amount that equals what will be spent. He discussed how surpluses have been transferred out in the past per the City’s fund balance policy. He noted the City did underfund this year by about $180,000, but in the final analysis, the City spent close to what was projected. He reported this was done each year because the City has not spent 100% of every single cost center as this would overtax the residents. Councilmember Holden stated the $400,000 that was transferred was set aside for future equipment replacement or vehicle purchases and noted this overage was the City overtaxing its residents. She commented these purchases have to be made out of the general fund and the Council had put these funds aside for CIP purchases. She indicated she was concerned with the fact the proposed budget has not had any strategic planning, but rather items were added and were being approved. She discussed how the City had three major trails coming up that would require City funding. She was of the opinion trails were more important to the community than parks because 27% of the City’s population was 15 and under. She did not believe a master park plan should be a priority at this time and she did not believe the City’s parks were underfunded. She reported the City’s parks were in really good shape and were always well manicured. She commented further on potential cuts that could be made to the budget. She recommended the parks master plan be pushed out several years in order to assist with reducing the tax levy. Councilmember Rousseau explained this reminded her of the discussions that were held last year noting the Council voted to support a 12.5% tax levy increase. She noted the Mayor supported only a 10% levy increase. She discussed how approving the 12.5% levy increase kept the general fund budget on track. She hoped Councilmember Holden would support the parks master plan in order to make the City’s parks a priority going forward. Mayor Grant reported earlier there was a comment about growing the City’s tax base. He agreed the City wanted to grow its tax base through TCAAP, but noted this development would also grow the City’s costs. He reported the Council voted to underfund the budget by $182,000 last year and the last projection had the budget coming in within $14,000. He reported he did not support overtaxing the residents of Arden Hills, which was why he supported some level of underfunding. He discussed the proposed shelter building and noted the $85,000 expense was quite high. He asked if the Hazelnut Park parking lot was in the budget at $315,000. Finance Director Yang reported this expense was included in the budget. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – DECEMBER 9, 2024 10 Mayor Grant anticipated this expense would come in substantially lower than the amount that was included in the budget. He asked if the public works FTE was to manage grants. Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen reported this would be just one of many duties for this position. Mayor Grant questioned if this position should remain in the budget as an expense item. He discussed the parks master plan, noting Mounds View recently completed a parks master plan that came back with an improvement price tag of $110 million. He supported the City Council looking at what was not done in the previous plan, prior to moving forward with a new parks master plan. He stated he did not support the City completing a parks master plan just to complete parks master plan. He understood one would be needed, but he was uncertain if this was needed next year. He discussed how the Great River Greening bid came in higher than anticipated. Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen reported this was the case, but noted this would not increase what the City will be contributing to these projects. Councilmember Monson asked what trails the City would be completing in the coming years. Councilmember Holden stated this included the Old Highway 10 trail, the Lake Johanna Trail, the County Road E trail from New Brighton and the Hamline Avenue Trail by Ingerson. Councilmember Monson reported the City had $880,000 set aside for trails which would pay for the extension on Highway 51 which would connect the neighborhood southeast of Lake Johanna on Old Snelling Road. She indicated the City learned MNDOT would be covering this $550,000 cost. She noted this meant funding could be shifted to the Elmer Anderson and Roseville trails. She explained the Council has had minimal conversations about how to fund the Old Highway 10 and Lake Johanna Trails. She understood the City had some grants, was seeking more grants and was considering making a bonding request from the State. She indicated the public should understand the Council has not discussed the Lake Johanna trail or the Highway 10 trail and how these projects will be folded into the budget, but the City continues to find grants. She reiterated that the Council has been working on the budget since June of this year and this was the first time she was hearing about making cuts to parks. She discussed how removing the parks master plan would not make a dent in the proposed tax levy increase. She asked that staff speak to this further. Finance Director Yang reported the budgeted tax levy for the PIR/CIP fund was set at $250,000 annually and noted other revenue sources make up the overall increase to the fund balance. She explained the $75,000 for the parks master plan would be coming from the PIR/CIP fund balance. Councilmember Monson stated tonight was the first time she was hearing the cost for the Hazelnut Park parking lot would come in less than $350,000 and the Council has been reviewing the budget for the past six months. She did not appreciate the fact several Councilmembers were now sharing their thoughts at the last minute because this showed a lack of coordination and openness. She stated she has worked really hard to try and find areas where she could make cuts and no one came up with any ideas at the previous budget discussions. She explained she would have enjoyed discussing the Hazelnut Park parking lot at a previous meeting and did not believe now was the time to make a change. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – DECEMBER 9, 2024 11 Councilmember Holden reported she did bring up things she was not interested in funding at the previous budget meetings and she was told these matters were moving forward and it appeared the Council was not interested in hearing her comments. She indicated there was no open discussion. She commented she was now reviewing what she wanted to cut because she was not allowed to speak previously. She stated the bottom line was, she wanted to plan for items and noted the Lake Johanna and Old Highway 10 trails were in the five-year plan. She questioned why she was not allowed to voice her opinion at this meeting. Mayor Grant reported the Council has discussed the Old Highway 10 and Old Snelling project. He asked if these projects were included in the five-year CIP, including some source of funds. Finance Director Yang indicated these projects were included in the five-year CIP. Mayor Grant noted MSA funding was also discussed and when this funding would be available. Finance Director Yang reported this was the case. Mayor Grant rejected the fact that those discussions have been minimal, but noted this may be because the project was three years out. He stated in regard to the Hazelnut Park parking lot there would be negotiations with the church. He noted he met with Interim City Administrator Jagoe last week and noted staff could share what they have when they have it. He commented he was not in favor of doing the parks master plan in 2025, but the consensus was to move this item forward. He was of the opinion the City Council was making a great deal of investments in the parks in 2025. He indicated the PTRC was to identify what trail segments are missing and this could be done by using the current parks master plan as this document lists all of the trails that should be completed. He understood the current plan was old, but he recommended the current plan be fully utilized. Councilmember Rousseau asked what dollar amount Councilmember Holden and Mayor Grant wanted to cut from the budget. Mayor Grant stated he would cut the $85,000 park building, the Hazelnut Park parking lot expense had to be reduced, parks master plan was $75,000 and one FTE for the Parks and Recreation Manager was $111,000. He asked how much the levy would be reduced if these items were removed from the budget. Councilmember Rousseau asked what the cost difference would be for the Hazelnut Park parking lot. Mayor Grant stated staff may not have a good number for the parking lot. Interim City Administrator Jagoe explained $315,000 was in the budget for this project reflected the full project costs. She noted staff did not have a good idea on what the actual costs would be for the City and the church. Councilmember Fabel indicated the budget before the City Council had been carefully prepared by staff. He explained the City had tremendously professional staff members. He was of the opinion every single item in the budget was based on direction from City Council and received some discussion over the past year. He noted the additional FTE for the Public Works Department ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – DECEMBER 9, 2024 12 was discussed at length by the City Council and this position would greatly assist the Public Works Department. He stated he did not support pulling this position out at this time. He recommended the Council not make quick decisions at this time, but rather that the thoughtful recommendations within the budget move forward as presented. Councilmember Holden reported she heard loud and clear from residents on National Night Out and from residents when she was door knocking that residents want the Council to curb costs. She indicated an expanded tax base only works when the City does not expand its expenditures. She discussed how people were hurting because costs continue to rise. She did not believe it was wrong for the Council to consider where cuts could be made. She explained the Council could approve 40 new positions, but this did not mean that these new positions had to be filled. She suggested the new parks position be hired for only half of the year next year and noted perhaps this new staff member could complete the parks master plan. She reported there were a lot of residents in the community that were living paycheck to paycheck that were looking for a break. She indicated she would continue to look for ways to make cuts because she believed this was what the residents of Arden Hills were asking for. Councilmember Rousseau asked if removing the building from Cummings Park would impact the levy. Finance Director Yang reported this project would not impact the levy if the PIR allotment remained at $250,000. Councilmember Rousseau questioned what the Hazelnut Park parking lot amount could be reduced to. Councilmember Holden estimated the expense could be reduced to $100,000. Councilmember Rousseau inquired if this reduction would impact the levy. Mayor Grant reported this would not have an impact on the levy. Councilmember Rousseau stated if the new FTE were to be placed at .75 versus .5 would impact the levy. Finance Director Yang reported this would create an underfunded amount of $110,000. Councilmember Rousseau explained the PTRC supported this position being fully funded and saw a lot of need for this new position. She asked if the $75,000 for the parks master plan would impact the levy. Finance Director Yang stated this expense would not impact the levy, rather just impacts the fund balance. Councilmember Holden questioned where the funding for the CIP and PIR came from. Finance Director Yang explained this came from the levy, grants, LGA, Minnesota State Aid and special assessments. She noted $250,000 from the general budget was being set aside for the CIP/PIR Fund. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – DECEMBER 9, 2024 13 Councilmember Holden reported if the Council did not put money in the CIP or PIR Fund, in future years, the City would have money to pay for other items. Finance Director Yang stated project expenditures drive down the fund balance and revenues increase the fund balance. Councilmember Monson reported the $250,000 allotment for the CIP Fund was set based on the five-year outlook for this fund. She explained the $250,000 was needed to cover the 2025 through 2029 projects. She stated under the CIP, $29.5 million was being spent in the next five years. She stated in 2025, $4.9 million would be spent. She stated if a $250,000 or $300,000 reduction was made into the CIP Fund allotment, would this impact the levy enough. She stated she was trying to figure out what type of levy Councilmember Holden and Mayor Grant would support. Councilmember Holden stated she did not see the purpose in coming up with a number. She indicated it has been spoken by the majority of the Council that they were happy with the proposed levy increase. She reported she was proposing to make cuts based on the concerns she has heard from residents. She stated just because staff was making the request for new vehicles does not mean the Council had to approve the request. Councilmember Rousseau asked if the Council was now to consider making cuts to vehicle purchases. Councilmember Holden indicated she was not making this recommendation because it did not matter. Councilmember Rousseau reported it appears the City did not need the funding for Hazelnut and with the park building, she could explain to the neighbors why the park building was no longer there. She indicated she would like to keep the FTE and parks master plan within the budget for 2025. Councilmember Holden stated the budget would still have to be amended to include an additional $25,000 to $30,000 for the public works salaries. Mayor Grant stated the Council approved the non-union compensation plan and the contribution to monthly benefits under Items 8B and 8C. He reported with the FTE and the parks master plan, he wasn’t saying the items should not move forward at some point in time, but suggested the items be pushed off in order to lower the levy. Councilmember Holden reported if the FTE were pushed back to July, the savings would cover the funding needed for the Public Works salaries. She recommended the parks master plan be pushed off to 2026 when the new FTE was in place. Councilmember Rousseau stated the Council discussed the FTE and there was a recommendation to move hire this individual in April. She suggested conversations shift to the $215,000 reduction for Hazelnut and the $85,000 for the park building. Mayor Grant reiterated the fact that these two items do not impact the levy. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – DECEMBER 9, 2024 14 Councilmember Fabel stated during the course of the year the Council heard a compelling presentation from Director Swearingen regarding the need for this additional staff member. He indicated the positive and negatives aspects were reviewed by staff. He commented after hearing the presentation, the Council recommended the position begin April 1. He recommended staff speak to the necessity and negative impacts if this position were not to begin in April of 2025. Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen commented this position was a necessary component for operations for the City to get to the standard that is expected from residents. He reported if the position were delayed, the City would remain in the same status it was today and programs that could be developed by this new position would be further delayed. Councilmember Fabel indicated Director Swearingen’s own time would be used more efficiently and effectively if he didn’t have to do the tasks proposed for the new FTE. Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen reported this was the case, noting he only had so much bandwidth. Councilmember Holden reported many of the new tasks for Director Swearingen were voted on by the Council. She asked what new parks programs were being proposed. Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen stated he was speaking of programs very broadly. Mayor Grant commented three members of the Council prefer the 15.5% levy and if this were the case, the levy would be set at 15.5%. He indicated he would venture to say 2% could be removed from the levy. Councilmember Monson stated she did not believe it was fair for the Mayor to assume what the Council would or would not support. Mayor Grant asked what items Councilmember Monson would like to cut from the budget. Councilmember Monson indicated she was interested in hearing what the Mayor would like to cut from the budget. Mayor Grant commented he was of the opinion the City would not spend 100% of every cost center. He noted last year the City underfunded the budget by $182,000. He suggested the levy increase be reduced to 13.5%, which would be an underfunding of $106,000. Councilmember Holden stated she could support this number. Mayor Grant stated the 2% decrease would offer residents some relief. He indicated it has been expressed to him by residents that the City was devaluing their homes by raising taxes. He appreciated the improvements the City was making in the community, which helps keep property values up. Councilmember Rousseau asked how a levy increase of 13.5% would impact the median value homeowner. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – DECEMBER 9, 2024 15 Finance Director Yang reported the impact would be a savings of $25 to $30 per year for property owners. Councilmember Monson clarified her previous comment noting increasing the City’s tax base was one way to address an underfunded general fund, but noted she was not advocating for a larger tax base or that this was the full solution, but rathe was a solution. Councilmember Fabel questioned if the Council were to reduce the levy from 15.5% to 13.5% would cause Arden Hills to have the lowest tax rate in Ramsey County. Finance Director Yang commented if the levy increase were reduced to 13.5%, the tax rate would be 27.547%, which would make Arden Hills the second lowest in Ramsey County. Councilmember Holden encouraged the Council to not compare itself to other cities in Ramsey County because every other city was different. She stated she was worried about the citizens of Arden Hills. She discussed why commercial businesses love to come to Arden Hills because the tax rate was low. Mayor Grant commented on how neighboring cities were different from Arden Hills. He commented on New Brighton’s tax levy noting this community received LGA and Shoreview did not. He stated Mounds View had its own police department and Arden Hills did not, so there were differences in each community. MOTION: Mayor Grant moved and Councilmember Rousseau seconded a motion to adopt Resolution 2024-059 - Setting the Final Levy at 13.5% for Taxes Payable in 2025. A roll call vote was taken. The motion carried 3-2 (Councilmembers Fabel and Monson opposed). Mayor Grant reported the second item for the Council to consider was the 2025 budget. Councilmember Holden recommended $30,000 be added into the budget as a placeholder under public works union pay. Mayor Grant stated the park building valued at $85,000 could be removed, the Hazelnut Park parking lot was down by $215,000, parks master plan down by $75,000 and this would reduce the budget by $375,000. Councilmember Holden recommended the FTE begin in July of 2025, which would accommodate the $30,000 needed for the public works union pay and that the parks master plan be moved out to 2026. She noted this would cover the needed savings. Mayor Grant suggested the park building expenditure be removed and that the Hazelnut Park parking lot be adjusted. He stated these two items would reduce the budget by $300,000. He reported if the parks master plan were pushed out to 2025, this would be another reduction of $75,000. Councilmember Monson indicated she would not support the pushing out the parks master plan or changing the FTE, but noted she could support the reduction for the Hazelnut Park parking lot and Cummings Park building change and adding back in $30,000 for the public works union pay. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – DECEMBER 9, 2024 16 Councilmember Rousseau explained she would not support a further reduction to the FTE. She recommended the hire take place on April 1, nor was she willing to compromise on the parks master plan. She supported the Council having a strategic plan discussion in 2025 in order to assist with making better decisions going forward. She indicated she could support the Cummings Park building and Hazelnut Park parking lot being cut. Councilmember Holden commented she visits Cummings Park quite often and asked how the building at this park was utilized. Councilmember Rousseau indicated parents sit in this building and noted groups use the space. She explained she was not opposed to eliminating this expense, but she noted the residents have not had input on this matter. Councilmember Holden reported a concrete base would remain in place and the City could place benches or a table in the concrete area that would remain in place, but the covered shelter would be removed. She asked what size the current shelter was. Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen indicated the current size was 16 feet by 20 feet. He noted the proposed estimate was based on the shelter replacement at Floral Park. He commented on how the concrete slab was not able to be reused at Floral Park because six-foot footings were required. Mayor Grant asked if the Cummings Park shelter would be good for another year. Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen recommended this shelter be taken down sooner rather than later because it was showing rusting and deteriorating on the legs of the structure. He indicated the shelter at Hazelnut could be pushed out. Councilmember Holden questioned if the removal of the shelter would come in as a park maintenance expense. Councilmember Fabel asked how much the budget had to be reduced to reach a 13.5% levy. Mayor Grant stated $106,000 had to be cut to achieve a balanced budget. Councilmember Fabel recommended the Hazelnut Park parking lot expenditure be reduced by $106,000. Mayor Grant indicated he had proposed cutting $300,000 between the park building and the Hazelnut Park parking lot. Councilmember Fabel reported he did not support pushing back the hire of the Public Works employee. He noted if there were other levy related cuts, he would consider them. Councilmember Holden stated it made more sense to her to have the new Public Works employee completing the parks master plan in order to learn about the City’s parks and their current condition versus paying an outside consultant to complete this work. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – DECEMBER 9, 2024 17 Councilmember Monson indicated she could defer the parks master plan to staff and if they recommended the plan be completed once the new FTE was brought on, she could support this recommendation. Interim City Administrator Jagoe stated it would take one year to complete the parks master plan. MOTION: Councilmember Monson moved and Councilmember Fabel seconded a motion to adopt Resolution 2024-060 - Adopting the 2025 Budget, remove the Cummings Park shelter building from the 2025 budget, reduce the Hazelnut Park parking lot expenditure down to $100,000 and add in the $30,000 for the Public Works union salary pay. The motion carried (5-0). 12. UNFINISHED BUSINESS MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Monson seconded a motion to remove the Agreement for Professional Services for Public Works Support Services – Engineering, Parks, MS4 and GIS – Bolton & Menk from the table. The motion carried (5-0). A. Motion to Approve Agreement for Professional Services for Public Works Support Services – Engineering, Parks, MS4 and GIS – Bolton & Menk Councilmember Holden requested further information from staff on this item. Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen explained this was the engineering services proposal from Bolton & Menk. He indicated he had an engineering services contract that he was involved with in 2021 and 2022. He noted services were discontinued with the latest consultant and staff was looking to renew a contract for engineering services in order to support GIS, engineering, parks, MS4 and general engineering services on an as-needed basis. He reported the budgeted amount for 2025 was $90,000. Mayor Grant indicated the item before the Council was to consider the agreement for professional services and not the amount. Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen reported this was the case. Councilmember Holden questioned if the City was spreading the engineering work between several consultants. Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen stated the City utilizes a few other consultants as well. MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Monson seconded a motion to Approve Agreement for Professional Services for Public Works Support Services – Engineering, Parks, MS4 and GIS – Bolton & Menk. The motion carried (5-0). 13. COUNCIL COMMENTS ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL – DECEMBER 9, 2024 18 Mayor Grant stated he received a request from a resident asking to install a stop sign on Lake Valentine Road at Old Snelling. He reported there had been a number of accidents at this intersection. He indicated there used to be a stop sign at this intersection and it had been removed. He recommended City staff review this matter. Mayor Grant commented he received an email from Ramsey County noting funding has been earmarked and approved for the 800 megahertz radios, noting the County would be receiving $2,965,000 in federal funding. He thanked Betty McCollum and Amy Klobuchar for their support on this item. Councilmember Holden commented it was the County who made the decision about Lake Valentine Road and Old Snelling because they wanted traffic to flow on Lake Valentine Road, and Ramsey County pulled the stop sign. She anticipated staff would have to speak with the County regarding this matter. Councilmember Fabel stated in the interest of time he would forego further comment. Councilmember Rousseau explained she would like further information from staff on the plans for the Hazelnut Park parking lot. Councilmember Rousseau thanked Planning Commissioners Arlene Mitchell, Shelley Blilie and Jonathan Wicklund for their service on the Planning Commission. Councilmember Monson reported a LEED for Communities Kickoff was held for Rice Creek Commons where the rubric for the project was reviewed. Councilmember Monson indicated the fire department approved the budget at their last meeting. ADJOURN MOTION: Mayor Grant moved and Councilmember Monson seconded a motion to adjourn. The motion carried (5-0). Mayor Grant adjourned the Regular City Council Meeting at 10:00 p.m. __________________________ __________________________ Julie Hanson David Grant City Clerk Mayor Approved: January 13, 2025 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION DECEMBER 16, 2024 5:30 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Grant called to order the City Council Work Session at 5:30 p.m. Present: Mayor David Grant; Councilmembers Tom Fabel, Brenda Holden, Tena Monson and Emily Rousseau Absent: None Also present: Interim City Administrator Jessica Jagoe, Public Works Director/City Engineer David Swearingen, and Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk Julie Hanson 1. PUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL Lynn Diaz, 1143 Ingerson Road, suggested the Council consider new language regarding fencing within City Code. She requested front yard fences be allowed to be higher than three feet. In addition, she recommended three feet of grass or ground cover be required adjacent to the street given the fact the City did not have sidewalks. 2. RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIES None. 3. AGENDA ITEMS A. Legislative Priorities Discussion Interim City Administrator Jagoe stated at the August 12th work session, the City Council discussed legislative priorities. In the past, the Council has selected projects from the CIP that it felt were good candidates for State funding. This year due to the lack of a bonding bill, neither of our requests for funding for the sewer forcemain work and Old Highway 10 Trail project were successful. Council considered the option of rolling forward our previous requests that did not get ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – DECEMBER 16, 2024 2 approved. Discussion concluded with a general consensus to table this item until after the State Representative presentations which occurred in November. Interim City Administrator Jagoe reported should the Council select projects it wants to pursue for future State funding, it should discuss how it wants to move forward. Below is what was previously agreed upon should the Council want to mirror a similar process. It should be noted that it is unclear if there will be a bonding bill in 2025. It is not a typical bonding year, but the last number of years have been atypical for State bonding projects. The 2025 Capital Budget Project Information for Local Government Capital Requests form notes that “the 2025 capital budget is an “off year” in the state’s capital budget process, meaning that political subdivision capital budget requests are not published for the 2025 legislative session. MMB will open the Capital Budget System (CBS) in May 2025 to collect and publish requests for the 2026 capital budget process.” • January/February 2025: Council discusses legislative priorities and designates the Mayor and a Councilmember to work with Staff on preparing items for funding requests and to be the Council point people for the requests. The Council may want to have preliminary discussions with its legislators in early 2025, too. • March 2025: Staff works with designated Councilmembers on preparing draft requests. • April 2025: MMB issues requests for funding. • April/May 2025: Designated Councilmembers work with Staff on finalizing requests (Council should work through the designated Councilmember on suggestions, edits, etc.). • May 2025: Council reviews draft requests, sets priorities if applicable, and passes resolutions of support. • June 2025: Requests submitted to MMB. • July 2025 to December 2025: Designated Councilmembers and Staff make any necessary adjustments to funding requests, seek additional letters of support if applicable, and engage with appropriate legislators. • January 2026 to April 2026: Designated Councilmembers and Staff work on any adjustments needed for inclusion in the Governor’s recommendation or working with Legislators on drafting their respective bills. Designated Councilmembers would also testify on behalf of the City and be the point people for Council-related communication. • April/May 2026: Legislature votes on funding requests. Further discussion ensued regarding the forcemain work proposed for Old Highway 10. Councilmember Holden supported the City pursuing funding for only one project in 2025 and another project in 2026. Councilmember Monson stated she could support the City moving forward in this direction and recommended the Old Highway 10 project be pursued in 2025. Mayor Grant reported this project was a safety need for the community. Councilmember Rousseau explained she supported the Old Highway 10 project moving forward in 2025 as well. ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – DECEMBER 16, 2024 3 Councilmember Holden expressed concern with the fact the City’s funding from the State may be impacted if funding for both City and TCAAP projects were requested in the same year. Councilmember Rousseau suggested the City request at least $1.2 million for the project given how inflation was impact costs. Mayor Grant reported the City was $2.8 million short on this project. Councilmember Holden recommended the City ask the State for at least $1.4 million. Interim City Administrator Jagoe reported the City asked for $1.55 million in 2024. Discussion ensued regarding a breakdown of the dollar figures, various options, and what amount the City should ultimately ask for. Mayor Grant said to Councilmember Holden that it sounded like she was okay with asking for $1.4 million, and Councilmember Holden concurred. Interim City Administrator Jagoe asked for confirmation from the Council that everything is dialed in regarding next steps and if there would be one or two Councilmembers available to assist with working on formalizing the request. Mayor Grant stated he would be willing to work on this. Councilmember Holden stated that she really thinks the City should push the school thing. Councilmember Monson indicated she would support the City asking for the amount the City was most likely to receive, whether this was $995,000 or $1.4 million. Mayor Grant requested staff move forward with a request for $1.4 million for the Old Highway 10 project. 4. COUNCIL COMMENTS AND STAFF UPDATES Councilmember Fabel commented there was legislative interest in curtailing City’s zoning authority in various respects and noted some mayors have come out speaking against this. He questioned if the Mayor’s association has taken a position on this. Mayor Grant indicated he has not seen any mayors coming out in favor of this. Councilmember Holden stated the League of Minnesota Cities has not been in support of this either. Councilmember Holden asked if there was a schedule for the getting the ice rinks up and running. Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen reported staff has been flooding the rinks overnight, which was why the lights have been on at the parks. ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION – DECEMBER 16, 2024 4 Mayor Grant asked that the lights remain off at the parks until the rinks were ready for use, noting staff can turn the lights on when on-site. Councilmember Rousseau requested direction from the Council regarding the adopt-a-park program. She noted the Rotary Club was interested in piloting a program with the City. Councilmember Monson recommended this matter be handed off to staff in order to move the program forward. Mayor Grant suggested notice be placed in the Arden Hills Notes, that certain parks were being adopted by such and such an organization going forward, in order to get the word out on the adopt-a-park program. Councilmember Holden agreed stating this would assist with promoting the City’s businesses and local organizations involvement in the City’s parks. Council consensus was to bring this item back to a future Council meeting for further discussion. Councilmember Rousseau thanked Councilmember Holden for passing along to Council the article regarding the Vancouver all electric community. Councilmember Monson commented on how the Vancouver power grid differed from the power grid in the Minneapolis/St. Paul metropolitan area. She noted the Rice Creek Commons project was much smaller than the Vancouver development. Mayor Grant noted he received an email from an individual who requested the City take a look at a stop sign at Lake Valentine Road and Old Highway 10. He discussed how the geometry of the road changed when the trail was installed. He expressed concern regarding the new trend for accidents at this intersection and recommended the accidents be documented by the Sheriff’s Department in order to better understand how to improve safety at this intersection. A discussion ensued regarding the Lake Valentine road and Old Highway 10 intersection. ADJOURN Mayor Grant adjourned the City Council Work Session at 6:20 p.m. __________________________ __________________________ Julie Hanson David Grant City Clerk Mayor Approved: January 13, 2025 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 16, 2024 ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor David Grant called to order the special City Council meeting at 6:30 p.m. Present: Mayor David Grant, Councilmembers Tom Fabel, Brenda Holden, Tena Monson and Emily Rousseau Absent: None Also present: Interim City Administrator Jessica Jagoe; Public Works Director/City Engineer Dave Swearingen; and Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk Julie Hanson PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor Grant reported Item 5A would require a closed session discussion. Councilmember Holden requested Items 5A and 5B be pulled from the Consent Agenda for discussion as Items 6A and 6B. MOTION: Councilmember Monson moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a motion to approve the meeting agenda as amended. The motion carried (5-0). 2. PUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL None. 3. RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIES None. 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL – DECEMBER 16, 2024 2 A. November 25, 2024, City Council Work Session B. November 25, 2024, Regular City Council MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Rousseau seconded a motion to approve the November 25, 2024, City Council Work Session meeting minutes as amended and November 25, 2024, Regular City Council meeting minutes as amended. The motion carried 4-0-1 (Councilmember Monson abstained). 5. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Motion to Approve 2025-2027 Collective Bargaining Agreement – IUOE 49 B. Motion to Approve Appointment of Joint Development Authority (JDA) Chair (2025-2026) C. Motion to Approve Cummings Park Pavilion Roof Replacement MOTION: Councilmember Monson moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a motion to approve the Consent Calendar as amended and to authorize execution of all necessary documents contained therein. The motion carried (5-0). 6. PULLED CONSENT ITEMS A. Motion to Approve 2025-2027 Collective Bargaining Agreement – IUOE 49 Mayor Grant reported the Council would be addressing this item in closed session and the Special City Council meeting was recessed at 6:39 p.m. The City Council discussed the 2025-2027 Collective Bargaining Agreement in a closed session pursuant to M.S. 13D.03, Subd. 1(b) and 179A.01 to 179A.25. Following conclusion of the closed session, Mayor Grant reconvened the Special City Council meeting at 7:05 p.m. MOTION: Councilmember Monson moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a motion to Approve 2025-2027 Collective Bargaining Agreement – IUOE 49, amending the document to pull the MOU for the Parks Lead, the Utilities Lead as well as pulling the Public Works Lead Pay Table and any other associated language changes as required. The motion carried (5-0). B. Motion to Approve Appointment of Joint Development Authority (JDA) Chair (2025-2026) Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk Hanson stated the Council had discussed this matter at a recent worksession regarding the appointment of Jonathan Wicklund for another two- year term as the JDA Chair. Councilmember Holden indicated she would not be supporting this item due to the fact Mr. Wicklund missed four of the last nine meetings. She explained Mr. Wicklund was the Chair under ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL – DECEMBER 16, 2024 3 the old regime and she supported a new member of the community serving as the JDA Chair that is able to attend the monthly meetings. Councilmember Fabel commented he believed Mr. Wicklund has done an outstanding job serving as the JDA Chair. While Mr. Wicklund had missed meetings, he had not missed meetings where significant decisions were made. He stated he supported Mr. Wicklund remaining the JDA Chair given his experience with the project and strong leadership abilities. Interim City Administrator Jagoe explained she spoke with Mr. Wicklund in advance to this meeting and noted he shared it appears he would only have to miss two meetings in 2025. Mayor Grant indicated he spoke with Mr. Wicklund as well and he understood Mr. Wicklund was indecisive of whether or not he wanted to come back as Chair but was willing to serve. He stated this was a difficult decision for him, but he believed the City would be well served by opening up appointments for the Chair position. He understood there were bigger issues that are impacting the Rice Creek Commons project. Councilmember Rousseau reported she had a conversation with Mr. Wicklund regarding his position on the Planning Commission. She understood he was indecisive regarding his service on the Planning Commission and was willing to step away from that position in order to continue his service with the JDA. She explained she supported Mr. Wicklund continuing to serve as the JDA Chair. MOTION: Councilmember Fabel moved and Councilmember Monson seconded a motion to Approve Appointment of Joint Development Authority (JDA) Chair (2025-2026). A roll call vote was taken. The motion carried 3-2 (Councilmember Holden and Mayor Grant opposed). 7. COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS Councilmember Holden excused herself from the meeting. Councilmember Monson thanked Councilmember Fabel for his service on the City Council and JDA over the past two years. Councilmember Fabel stated this was his last meeting on the City Council. He hoped that everyone in the City can appreciate the outstanding staff that worked on behalf of the community. He believed the City was very well served by the professionals on staff. He urged the Council to continue to take care of the City staff members going forward. He stated he was proud of the City’s efforts to move forward with the TCAAP project after a period of stalemate and that more housing would be provided to Arden Hills residents. Councilmember Rousseau explained she has enjoyed working with Councilmember Fabel over the past two years and thanked him for his service to the City of Arden Hills. Councilmember Rousseau stated she was interested in serving on the Gateway Visitor’s Bureau. Mayor Grant reported he contacted the director of the Gateway Visitor’s Bureau and explained he would like to continue with this organization. He explained in his conversation with the ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL – DECEMBER 16, 2024 4 director, he has learned other attenders are invited to the meetings. He encouraged Councilmember Rousseau to consider attending these quarterly meetings. ADJOURN MOTION: Councilmember Monson moved and Mayor Grant seconded a motion to adjourn. The motion carried (4-0). Mayor Grant adjourned the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:25 p.m. __________________________ __________________________ Julie Hanson David Grant City Clerk Mayor CONSENT ITEM 8A MEMORANDUM DATE: January 13, 2025 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Jessica Jagoe, Interim City Administrator FROM: Joua Yang, Finance Director Pang Silseth, Accounting Analyst SUBJECT: Claims and Payroll Listing Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A Council Should Consider Motion to approve, table or deny the following:  Claims and Payroll Listing All items need a simple majority for action unless otherwise noted. Background Payroll is processed biweekly and accounts payable is processed weekly. Budget Impact N/A Attachments 2024 Payroll #26 $95,926.40 2025 Payroll #01 $139,456.17 Total Payroll $235,382.57 Paid Claims - 12/01/2024-12/27/2024 (Check Nos. 53039-53100 and ACH Checks) $1,193,777.44 Total Accounts Payable $1,193,777.44 Total Claims $1,429,160.01 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS PAYROLL # 26 CHECKS DATED: 12/20/24 Biweekly: 11/30/24 - 12/13/24 EMPLOYEE DEDUCTIONS AMT.Payment Method FIT 6,859.54 EFT FICA Oasdi 4,855.73 EFT FICA Medicare 1,135.62 EFT SIT 3,210.12 EFT TOTAL TAXES 16,061.01 Health Premium 2,223.00 A/P Check* Dental Premium 186.69 A/P Check* FSA Health Care Reimb. 133.33 A/P Check* FSA Dependent Care Reimb. 0.00 A/P Check* TOTAL FLEXIBLE SPENDING 2,543.02 HSA Health Saving 1,152.03 EFT TOTAL HEALTH SAVINGS 1,152.03 PERA 5,314.61 EFT ICMA 1,233.80 EFT Central Pension Fund-Union 1,536.00 A/P Check* MN State Retirement System 1,700.00 EFT TOTAL RETIREMENT 9,784.41 AFLAC 22.76 EFT Life/Addl/Dep Life 49.29 A/P Check* Life/Addl non-tax 20.80 A/P Check* LTD/STD Insurance 0.00 A/P Check* PERA Life Insurance 118.80 A/P Check* IUOE 49 Dues (Union) 40.00 A/P Check* TOTAL VOLUNTARY 251.65 Total Employee Deductions 29,792.12 Net Payroll 0.00 Direct Deposit 52,124.80 EFT Gross Payroll Tie-Out 82,056.92 Plus City Paid Benefit 13,869.48 TOTAL PAYROLL COST 95,926.40 FICA TIE-OUT Gross Payroll 82,056.92 Less Total FSA 2,543.02 Less Total H.SA 1,152.03 Less Voluntary Ins 43.56 Net P/R Subject to FICA 78,318.31 FICA Oasdi @ 6.20% 4,855.73 FICA Medicare @ 1.45% 1,135.62 Note: Federal and State Payroll Tax obligations are satisfied by means of utilizing the US Bank Easy Tax Deposit Service. Transfers are typically made up to two days after the payroll date. * A/P Checks can be found on the ACCOUNTS PAYABLE Check Approval report. Checks may be paid this week or the following week. 8.60 8.60 250.00 6,132.23 0.00 6,132.23 1,487.30 250.00 5,991.35 1,381.98 105.32 CITY BENEFIT 4,855.73 1,135.62 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS PAYROLL # 1 CHECKS DATED: 01/03/25 Biweekly: 12/14/24 - 12/27/24 EMPLOYEE DEDUCTIONS AMT.Payment Method FIT 8,872.85 EFT FICA Oasdi 5,532.30 EFT FICA Medicare 1,293.82 EFT SIT 3,893.35 EFT TOTAL TAXES 19,592.32 Health Premium 2,451.42 A/P Check* Dental Premium 215.30 A/P Check* FSA Health Care Reimb. 133.33 A/P Check* FSA Dependent Care Reimb. 208.33 A/P Check* TOTAL FLEXIBLE SPENDING 3,008.38 HSA Health Saving 1,152.03 EFT TOTAL HEALTH SAVINGS 1,152.03 PERA 5,974.14 EFT ICMA 1,287.79 EFT Central Pension Fund-Union 1,536.00 A/P Check* MN State Retirement System 1,700.00 EFT TOTAL RETIREMENT 10,497.93 AFLAC 22.76 EFT Life/Addl/Dep Life 50.29 A/P Check* Life/Addl non-tax 21.81 A/P Check* LTD/STD Insurance 1,350.57 A/P Check* PERA Life Insurance 40.00 A/P Check* IUOE 49 Dues (Union) 140.00 A/P Check* TOTAL VOLUNTARY 1,625.43 Total Employee Deductions 35,876.09 Net Payroll 0.00 Direct Deposit 57,251.73 EFT Gross Payroll Tie-Out 93,435.37 Plus City Paid Benefit 46,020.80 TOTAL PAYROLL COST 139,456.17 FICA TIE-OUT Gross Payroll 93,435.37 Less Total FSA 3,008.38 Less Total H.SA 1,152.03 Less Voluntary Ins 44.57 Net P/R Subject to FICA 89,230.39 FICA Oasdi @ 6.20% 5,532.30 FICA Medicare @ 1.45% 1,293.82 Note: Federal and State Payroll Tax obligations are satisfied by means of utilizing the US Bank Easy Tax Deposit Service. Transfers are typically made up to two days after the payroll date. * A/P Checks can be found on the ACCOUNTS PAYABLE Check Approval report. Checks may be paid this week or the following week. 6,826.12 CITY BENEFIT 5,532.30 1,293.82 0.00 30,215.31 737.24 30,952.55 1,250.00 1,250.00 6,893.23 6,893.23 98.90 98.90 Accounts Payable User: Printed: pang.silseth 1/8/2025 9:53 AM Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 0327 STAPLES INC 12/06/2024ACH 6017278414 Supplies 133.11 6017278415 Supplies 48.89 6017278415 Supplies 92.05 274.05Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0327: 0387 MISSIONSQUARE #302482 12/06/2024ACH PR 24-25 PR Batch 00100.12.2024 ICMA Employee DeductionPR Batch 00100.12.2024 ICMA Employee Deduction 1,000.00 PR 24-25 PR Batch 00100.12.2024 ICMA Employee PercentPR Batch 00100.12.2024 ICMA Employee Percent 240.24 1,240.24Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0387: 10363 MINUTE MAKER SECRETARIAL 12/06/2024ACH M1976 November CC Meeting Minutes 537.50 537.50Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 10363: 10365 JENNIFER SHULL 12/06/2024ACH 120224 Mileage Reimbursement 22.78 22.78Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 10365: 10474 RECYCLE TECHNOLOGIES 12/06/2024ACH 251137 Lights Recycle Bin 40.00 40.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 10474: 10476 TWIN CITIES COMMERCIAL CLEANERS12/06/2024ACH 12241389 Janitorial Services-November 1,554.58 1,554.58Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 10476: 10497 CINTAS CORP 12/06/2024ACH 4211919977 November Mats 105.39 5240388406 First Aid Supplies 90.82 5240388406 First Aid Supplies 198.80 395.01Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 10497: 1125 BOLTON & MENK INC 12/06/2024ACH 0349479 Professional Services 9/14-10/11 5,755.00 0349479 PC 24-018 #784 9/14-10/11 1,095.00 0349479 PC 24-016 #777 9/14-10/11 1,293.50 8,143.50Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 1125: 1254 NUSS TRUCK & EQUIPMENT 12/06/2024ACH ESA001622-1 2025 Mack Truck sales tax registration fee 9,140.34 9,140.34Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 1254: Page 1AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (1/8/2025 9:53 AM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 5173 BADGER METER 12/06/2024ACH 80179420 Beacon & LTE Serv Units-November 724.80 724.80Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 5173: 8870 CHET'S SHOES INC 12/06/2024ACH LLC190813 Boots-Seasonal EE 125.00 125.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 8870: ALPI ALLEGRA PRINT & IMAGING INC 12/06/2024ACH 173286 2024-2025 Winter Guide 5,060.43 173286 2024-2025 Winter Guide Postage 1,047.42 6,107.85Total for this ACH Check for Vendor ALPI: 0131 BEISSWENGERS DO IT BEST 12/06/202453039 939685 supplies 21.98 939730 supplies 23.97 45.95Total for Check Number 53039: 1018 BETHEL UNIVERSITY 12/06/202453040 111824 TCG Grant:2024 Homecoming/Family Weekend 7,599.39 7,599.39Total for Check Number 53040: CPF1 CENTRAL PENSION FUND SOURCE A 12/06/202453041 184503.1124 November Pension 3,072.00 3,072.00Total for Check Number 53041: 10276 CITY OF COON RAPIDS 12/06/202453042 AR-0000014539 2024 Sealcoating 1,391.94 1,391.94Total for Check Number 53042: 0176 FRATTALLONES HARDWARE INC 12/06/202453043 E59190/A Supplies 6.76 6.76Total for Check Number 53043: 0447 I.U.O.E LOCAL 49 BENEFIT FUND-INSURANCE12/06/202453044 BP3.0125 January Insurance 11,800.00 NB4.0125 January Insurance 1,682.00 13,482.00Total for Check Number 53044: INCI IN CONTROL INC 12/06/202453045 S-INV01826 Booster Trend Support 1,774.50 S-INV01840 North Tower Service 1,456.00 3,230.50Total for Check Number 53045: 10556 INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS LLC 12/06/202453046 IN4701484 Supplies 96.53 96.53Total for Check Number 53046: 0495 LAKE JOHANNA FIRE DEPARTMENT INC12/06/202453047 945 2024 Reimbursement: Tire Replacement 2,086.63 948 2023 Reimbursement:Lighting 2,152.61 955 2024 Reimbursement: Portable Monitor Nozzle 1,700.82 Page 2AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (1/8/2025 9:53 AM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 958 2024 Reimbursement: Mobile Tablet Replacement 14,000.97 19,941.03Total for Check Number 53047: 10362 MARCO TECHNOLOGIES LLC 12/06/202453048 INV13220432 Copier 11/25-12/24 77.18 INV13220432 Copier 11/25-12/24 13.62 90.80Total for Check Number 53048: 7064 ROTARY CLUB OF ARDEN HILLS-SHOREVIEW12/06/202453049 4608365 Q4 Dues 127.50 127.50Total for Check Number 53049: 0336 T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS INC 12/06/202453050 70779 Sand Mix 241.38 241.38Total for Check Number 53050: 10568 VERIZON CONNECT 12/06/202453051 332000066688 November Service 334.95 334.95Total for Check Number 53051: 77,966.38Total for 12/6/2024: 0189 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 12/13/2024ACH 4110190 November Locates 27.00 4110190 November Locates 27.00 4110190 November Locates 27.00 81.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0189: 0292 OXYGEN SERVICE COMPANY INC 12/13/2024ACH 0003603460 November Rental 36.71 36.71Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0292: 0320 HEALTH PARTNERS INC 12/13/2024ACH 009593860979 January 2025 Insurance 1,220.47 009593860979 January 2025 Insurance 23,057.91 24,278.38Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0320: 0327 STAPLES INC 12/13/2024ACH 6017974686 Supplies 51.84 6018682819 Supplies 25.89 6018682819 Supplies 50.36 128.09Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0327: 0761 ELECTRIC PUMP INC 12/13/2024ACH 027153 Sensing Units and Hour Meter 3,412.45 3,412.45Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0761: 0922 NINENORTH 12/13/2024ACH 2024-192 JDA November Audio/Visual 188.10 2024-192 November Audio/Visual 1,377.95 Page 3AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (1/8/2025 9:53 AM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 1,566.05Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0922: 1889 DAVID PERRAULT 12/13/2024ACH 20244 Professional Services -November 250.00 250.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 1889: 2490 CORE & MAIN LP 12/13/2024ACH V943130 Supplies-Gate Valve 4,268.67 4,268.67Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 2490: 2501 DAVIS LOCK AND SAFE 12/13/2024ACH 92348 Keys 70.00 70.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 2501: 2851 MC TOOL & SAFETY SALES INC 12/13/2024ACH 021098 Staff Jackets 487.50 487.50Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 2851: 3698 BOLD VENTURE YOGA LLC 12/13/2024ACH 12112024 Fall Yoga 708.00 708.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 3698: 4889 COMMUNITY FOOTWORKS 12/13/2024ACH 12042024 Foot Care Clinic 12/4 236.80 236.80Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 4889: 6555 TKDA INC 12/13/2024ACH 002024006514 2024 CIPP Lining 10/27-11/23 1,231.05 002024006711 SouthTower Improve 10/27-11/23 2,191.58 3,422.63Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 6555: 7025 ON SITE COMPANIES -OSSTC INC 12/13/2024ACH 0001818586 Restrooms 11/23/24-12/20/24 858.00 0001822938 Restrooms -378.75 479.25Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 7025: 7501 KELLY & LEMMONS PA 12/13/2024ACH 64360 November Prosecution 3,933.74 3,933.74Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 7501: JOHC JOHNSON CONTROLS INC 12/13/2024ACH 00047846005 Cummings Parlk Furnance 4,958.50 1-134873482900 Boiler Vent 1,541.24 6,499.74Total for this ACH Check for Vendor JOHC: AR-ALBR ALBRECHT ENTERPRISES LLC 12/13/202453052 GE 2024-00005 Escrow Refund GE 2024-00005; 3235 Lexington Ave 731.96 731.96Total for Check Number 53052: 10591 BUILDING STRONG COMMUNITIES 12/13/202453053 BSC-BYR2024-1 TCG Grant-Ribfest 8,457.50 Page 4AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (1/8/2025 9:53 AM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription BSC-BYR2024-2 TCG Grant-Ribfest 1,525.86 9,983.36Total for Check Number 53053: 10483 CENTRAL PENSION FUND 12/13/202453054 401333.1124 November Apprenticeship Fund 384.00 384.00Total for Check Number 53054: AR-CITY CITY HOMES LLC 12/13/202453055 2023-01106 Escrow Refund Driveway/Curb 2023-01106; 1861 Highway 96 1,000.00 1,000.00Total for Check Number 53055: 1033 COMCAST 12/13/202453056 101030.1224 Service 12/3-1/2 108.35 108.35Total for Check Number 53056: 10446 FINANCE & COMMERCE INC 12/13/202453057 7215561 1 Year Subscription Renewal 384.00 384.00Total for Check Number 53057: 1040 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP INC 12/13/202453058 024-028-6 Zoning Code Update through 11/30 1,307.50 1,307.50Total for Check Number 53058: 0390 INT'L UNION OPERATING ENGINEERS-UNION DUES12/13/202453059 1200.1224 Decemer Dues 280.00 280.00Total for Check Number 53059: 0495 LAKE JOHANNA FIRE DEPARTMENT INC12/13/202453060 951 2024 Reimbursement: Drinking Fountain 1,854.40 962 2024 Reimbursement: Ladder Truck Rosenbauer Aerial 183,208.38 185,062.78Total for Check Number 53060: AR-MANU MANUFACTURED HOUSING EQUIPMENT12/13/202453061 DEMO 2024-01151 Escrow Refund DEMO 2024-01151; 4701 Prior Ave 2,000.00 DEMO 2024-01203 Escrow Refund DEMO 2024-012031; 4570 Prior Ct 2,000.00 4,000.00Total for Check Number 53061: 10448 MARCO TECHNOLOGIES LLC 12/13/202453062 543754303 Copier 12/25-1/24 35.36 543754303 Copier 12/25-1/24 200.35 235.71Total for Check Number 53062: 0257 MINNESOTA DEPT OF HEALTH 12/13/202453063 11142024 Q4 Water Connection 6,429.00 6,429.00Total for Check Number 53063: 10486 MINNESOTA METRO NORTH TOURISM BUREAU12/13/202453064 120324 Quality Inn October Lodging Tax 3,025.36 3,025.36Total for Check Number 53064: 10286 MINNESOTA OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH 12/13/202453065 Page 5AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (1/8/2025 9:53 AM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 476231 Drug Screen 70.00 70.00Total for Check Number 53065: 1208 PREMIUM WATERS INC 12/13/202453066 610207-11-24 November Water 16.17 613317-11-24 November Water 39.93 56.10Total for Check Number 53066: AR-RAIN RAINBOW TREE COMPANY 12/13/202453067 ROW 2023-01018 Escrow Refund ROW 2023-01018: 1417 Arden Place 4,000.00 4,000.00Total for Check Number 53067: 0811 RAMSEY COUNTY 12/13/202453068 EMCOM-012086 Fleet Support-November 24.96 EMCOM-012122 CAD Services-November 781.75 EMCOM-012138 911 Dispatch-November 5,084.42 FLEET-000950 Fuel Purchases-October 2,552.61 PRMG-005573 PW Rental Space-December 5,843.55 PRMG-005573 PW Rental Space-December 2,921.78 PRMG-005573 PW Rental Space-December 2,921.78 PRMG-005573 PW Rental Space-December 1,298.56 21,429.41Total for Check Number 53068: 0282 REPUBLIC SERVICES #899 12/13/202453069 0899-004615219 PW Waste-November 404.43 404.43Total for Check Number 53069: AR-SCAN SCANNELL PROPERTIES 12/13/202453070 GE 2022-00185 Escrow Refund GE 2022-00185; 4200 Round Lake Road 80,000.00 80,000.00Total for Check Number 53070: AR-SCAN1 SCANNELL PROPERTIES 12/13/202453071 GE 2021-00620 Escrow Refund GE 2021-00620; 4200 Round Lake Rd 43,773.92 43,773.92Total for Check Number 53071: SRFC SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC 12/13/202453072 16750.00-12 Highway 10 Trail 9/30 7,257.28 16750.00-13 Highway 10 Trail 11/30 762.16 8,019.44Total for Check Number 53072: 1579 TOW MASTER INC 12/13/202453073 473777 2025 Mack Granite Plow Truck- 181,097.00 473779 2025 Mack Granite Plow Truck- Tarp Addition 4,717.00 185,814.00Total for Check Number 53073: 606,358.33Total for 12/13/2024: 0192 GRAINGER INC 12/20/2024ACH 9341022748 Supplies 265.06 9345689518 Supplies 10.26 Page 6AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (1/8/2025 9:53 AM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 275.32Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0192: 0285 XCEL ENERGY 12/20/2024ACH 904957188 10/14/24-12/02/24 1,632.09 904957188 10/14/24-12/02/24 1,767.12 904957188 10/14/24-12/02/24 750.64 904957188 10/14/24-12/02/24 210.54 904957188 10/14/24-12/02/24 44.74 904957188 10/14/24-12/02/24 1,630.09 904957188 10/14/24-12/02/24 1,042.75 7,077.97Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0285: 0387 MISSIONSQUARE #302482 12/20/2024ACH PR 24-26 PR Batch 00200.12.2024 ICMA Employee PercentPR Batch 00200.12.2024 ICMA Employee Percent 233.80 PR 24-26 PR Batch 00200.12.2024 ICMA Employee DeductionPR Batch 00200.12.2024 ICMA Employee Deduction 1,000.00 1,233.80Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0387: 0453 CONTINENTAL RESEARCH CORP 12/20/2024ACH 0052958 Supplies 128.00 128.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0453: 0750 VERIZON WIRELESS 12/20/2024ACH 6100842480 Service 12/11-1/10 897.30 897.30Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0750: 10363 MINUTE MAKER SECRETARIAL 12/20/2024ACH M1984 December JDA Meeting Minutes 167.00 M1984 December PC Meeting Minutes 325.50 M1984 December CC Meeting Minutes 406.00 898.50Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 10363: 1125 BOLTON & MENK INC 12/20/2024ACH 0351669 PC24-018 #784 10/12-11/8 803.00 0351669 PC24-016 #777 10/12-11/8 511.00 0351669 Professional Services 10/12-11/8 6,525.00 0351669 PC24-014 #760 10/12-11/8 365.00 0351739 2025 Park Improve 10/12-11/8 4,760.50 12,964.50Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 1125: 1365 J.P. COOKE CO 12/20/2024ACH 862934 Cat/Dog Tags 136.50 136.50Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 1365: 5587 CES IMAGING INC 12/20/2024ACH INV168557 December Rental 60.00 60.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 5587: 8032 PACE ANALYTICAL FIELD SVC INC 12/20/2024ACH 24122210 November Drinking Water Survey 1,265.25 1,265.25Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 8032: BOND BOND TRUST SERVICES CORP 12/20/2024ACH Page 7AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (1/8/2025 9:53 AM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 91163 REF: 331734 GO Utility Revenue Bonds 2018A Interest 3,225.00 91163 REF: 331734 GO Utility Revenue Bonds 2018A Principal 210,000.00 91163 REF: 331734 GO Utility Revenue Bonds 2018A Principal 35,000.00 91163 REF: 331734 GO Utility Revenue Bonds 2018A Interest 20,475.00 92687 REF: 92687-PA Paying Agent Fee Bonds 2018A 64.00 92687 REF: 92687-PA Paying Agent Fee Bonds 2018A 411.00 269,175.00Total for this ACH Check for Vendor BOND: TOII TOKLE INSPECTIONS INC 12/20/2024ACH 120524 November Electrical Inspections 2,873.88 2,873.88Total for this ACH Check for Vendor TOII: AR-AHSL AHSL PARTNERS LLC 12/20/202453075 PC 19-002 Escrow Refund PC 19-002; 1740 Parkshore Drive #591 20,000.00 20,000.00Total for Check Number 53075: 0131 BEISSWENGERS DO IT BEST 12/20/202453076 943660 supplies 15.99 15.99Total for Check Number 53076: 10347 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS INC 12/20/202453077 2024-00362 Refund: Hydrant Rental Deposit 2,000.00 2,000.00Total for Check Number 53077: 1033 COMCAST 12/20/202453078 98681.1224 Service 12/5-1/4 111.52 111.52Total for Check Number 53078: 10244 COMCAST BUSINESS INC 12/20/202453079 226327235 service 12/1-12/31 509.40 509.40Total for Check Number 53079: 0841 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC.12/20/202453080 99883 TCAAP-November 4,101.25 4,101.25Total for Check Number 53080: 9045 HAPPY FEET DANCE COMPANY LLC 12/20/202453081 121224 Fall Dance 1,122.00 1,122.00Total for Check Number 53081: AR-JRG HEATHER R MALECHA 12/20/202453082 PC 24-004 Escrow Refund PC 24-004; 1594 Lake Johanna Blvd 585.67 585.67Total for Check Number 53082: 10592 HK CONSTRUCTION 12/20/202453083 2024-00581 Refund: Hydrant Rental Deposit 2,000.00 2,000.00Total for Check Number 53083: 10579 LEVANDER GILLEN & MILLER P.A.12/20/202453084 42000E-1124 PC 24-009 #750 November Legal 211.50 42000E-1124 PC 24-016 #777 November Legal 470.00 42000E-1124 November Legal 1,339.50 Page 8AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (1/8/2025 9:53 AM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 42000E-1124 November Legal 7,860.95 9,881.95Total for Check Number 53084: UB*00757 CHRISTOPHER MANRODT 12/20/202453085 Refund Check 003655-000, 1515 Colleen Avenue 4.99 4.99Total for Check Number 53085: 10523 METRO-INET 12/20/202453086 2307 IT Support-December 9,526.00 9,526.00Total for Check Number 53086: UB*00758 KOSTI MYLONOPOULOS 12/20/202453087 Refund Check 013032-000, 4395 Arden View Court 283.57 283.57Total for Check Number 53087: 0600 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS 12/20/202453088 315800012025 January 2025 Insurance 80.00 80.00Total for Check Number 53088: 0155 OFFICE OF MN IT SERVICES 12/20/202453089 W24110621 November Phones 750.62 750.62Total for Check Number 53089: UB*00754 MARY ORTT 12/20/202453090 Refund Check 001965-000, 1419 Arden Place 204.14 204.14Total for Check Number 53090: UB*00756 DALE PEER REVOCABLE TRUST 12/20/202453091 Refund Check 012418-000, 4404 Arden View Court 150.43 150.43Total for Check Number 53091: 0811 RAMSEY COUNTY 12/20/202453092 FLEET-000953 Equipment Service Repair-October 3,065.90 FLEET-000953 Equipment Repair Parts-October 2,362.47 PRRRV-002449 Election Services Q1 2024 6,850.00 SHRFL-002284 Law Enforcement-December 131,853.14 144,131.51Total for Check Number 53092: AR-REFU REFUGE DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE 12/20/202453093 GE 2023-00965 Escrow Refund GE 2023-00965; 1563 Edgewater Ave 1,833.30 1,833.30Total for Check Number 53093: 6748 RELIANCE STANDARD 12/20/202453094 GL154938 January 2025 Insurance 1,593.64 1,593.64Total for Check Number 53094: 0282 REPUBLIC SERVICES #899 12/20/202453095 0899-004611610 Recycling Revenue Sharing-November -433.81 0899-004611610 Recycling-November 9,272.97 8,839.16Total for Check Number 53095: Page 9AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (1/8/2025 9:53 AM) Check No Check DateVendor NameVendor No Check Amount Invoice No ReferenceDescription 10496 RESTORATION SYSTEMS INC 12/20/202453096 2024-00445 Refund: Hydrant Rental Deposit 2,000.00 2024-00445 Water Hydrant Usage -52.09 1,947.91Total for Check Number 53096: UB*00759 CHARLES RYTHER 12/20/202453097 Refund Check 000516-000, 1454 Arden View Drive 220.23 220.23Total for Check Number 53097: 10569 SM HENTGES AND SONS INC 12/20/202453098 2024-00374 Refund: Hydrant Rental Deposit 2,000.00 2,000.00Total for Check Number 53098: UB*00760 CHARLES STODDARD 12/20/202453099 Refund Check 000986-000, 4304 Colleen Court 553.10 553.10Total for Check Number 53099: UB*00755 GARY ABRAHAMSON 12/20/202453100 Refund Check 002107-000, 1228 Carlton Drive 20.33 20.33Total for Check Number 53100: 509,452.73Total for 12/20/2024: Report Total (101 checks): 1,193,777.44 Page 10AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (1/8/2025 9:53 AM) Page 1 of 1 CONSENT ITEM – 8B MEMORANDUM DATE: January 13, 2025 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Jessica Jagoe, Interim City Administrator FROM: Julie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk SUBJECT: Resolution 2025-001 Relating to the Organization of the City of Arden Hills Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: $ $ $ Council Should Consider Motions to approve, table, or deny the following: • Resolution 2025-001 Relating to the Organization of the City of Arden Hills. Background/Discussion Per State law, the organization of the City of Arden Hills is re-established yearly. The City is required to designate official depositories, the official newspaper, and statutory authority. The attached Resolution 2025-001 requests the appointment of these designations relating to Arden Hills’ organization as required by law. Budget Impact N/A Attachments Attachment A: Resolution 2025-001 Page 1 of 2 To view the final document, access adopted Resolutions via Arden Hills Public Laserfiche Weblink by visiting cityofardenhills.org and clicking on Archived Documents under Helpful Links on our main webpage. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2025-001 Resolution Relating to the Organization of the City of Arden Hills BE IT RESOLVED by the City of Arden Hills, Ramsey County, Minnesota (City) as follows: Section 1. Official Depository. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 118A.02, Subdivision 1, the City Council designates the following financial institutions as official depositories for municipal funds: a) US Bank b) Wells Fargo Bank c) RBC Wealth Management d) 4M Fund (PMA Financial Network, Inc.) Section 2. Official Newspaper. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.831, the City Council designates the following newspaper as official newspaper of the City: a) St. Paul Pioneer Press The Mayor and Clerk are authorized and directed to enter into agreements with the official newspaper for the publication of items required by law to be published. Section 3. Officers: Employees: Appointment. The following persons are appointed to the offices indicated. Interim City Administrator Jessica Jagoe City Clerk Julie Hanson Finance Director/Treasurer Joua Yang Section 4. Acting Officers; Deputies. The following are appointed to the office indicated. Acting Administrator: David Swearingen Deputy Clerk: Jennifer Estling Deputy Treasurer: Jessica Jagoe Section 5. Regular Council Meetings. The regular meeting of the City Council of Arden Hills is to be held on the second and fourth Monday of each month at 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall. Attachment A Page 2 of 2 To view the final document, access adopted Resolutions via Arden Hills Public Laserfiche Weblink by visiting cityofardenhills.org and clicking on Archived Documents under Helpful Links on our main webpage. Section 6. City Attorney. The firm of LeVander, Gillen and Miller, P.A. is appointed City Attorney with Greta Bjerkness as primary City Attorney. Section 7. Financial Consultant. The firm Ehlers & Associates, Inc. is appointed financial consultant. Section 8. Engineer. David Swearingen is appointed as the City Engineer. Section 9. Auditor. The firm LB Carlson (formerly known as Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich and Company (MMKR)) is appointed City Auditor. Section 10. Insurance Consultant. North Risk Partners is appointed insurance consultant with Steve Chismar as principal consultant. Section 11. Emergency Management Director. Lake Johanna Fire Department is appointed Emergency Management Director. Section 12. Police. Ramsey County Sheriff’s Office is appointed as the City police and law enforcement agency. Section 13. Fire. Lake Johanna Fire Department is appointed as the City Fire Safety Officer. Section 14. Fee Schedule. The fee schedule for the year 2025 was adopted as Ordinance number 2024-016. Section 15. Animal Control. Ramsey County is appointed as the City animal control officer. Section 16. Elections. Ramsey County is appointed to administer Elections. Section 17. Electronic Funds Transfers. The Finance Director shall be delegated authority to make electronic funds transfers. The Finance Director may delegate certain duties to appropriate staff but shall remain responsible for the operation of the transfer program. Adopted this 13th day of January, 2025. ____________________________________ David Grant, Mayor ATTEST: ______________________________________ Julie Hanson, City Clerk Page 1 of 2 CONSENT ITEM – 8C MEMORANDUM DATE: January 13, 2025 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Jessica Jagoe, Interim City Administrator FROM: Julie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk SUBJECT: 2025 City Commissions and Committees Appointments Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A Council Should Consider the Following Options Motion to approve, table, or deny the following: • Approving Resolution 2025-002 Relating to the Appointments to the Commissions and Committees of the City. Background The City Council annually appoints residents to serve on the various Commissions or Committees in an advisory capacity to the City Council. Per City Code Chapter 2, Section 220, Subsection 220.01, Subd. 7 and 7(A), Commission and Committee Members shall serve for a term of three (3) years and each Member may serve for no more than three (3) consecutive three-year terms. The following sets forth the current Commissioners and Committee Members whose terms expired December 31, 2024, and whether or not they are seeking reappointment for an additional three-year term, together with appointment or reaffirmation of Chairs: Planning Commission • Joshua Collins is seeking appointment of a new three-year term ending December 31, 2027 and appointment as Chair. • Ben Lindau, currently an alternate, is seeking appointment as a regular member within his current term that ends December 31, 2026. • Patrick Burlingame is seeking appointment of a three-year term ending December 31, 2027. • Jonathan Wicklund is not seeking reappointment. • Arlene Mitchell is not seeking reappointment. • Shelley Blilie is not seeking reappointment. Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee (PTRC) • Dan Dietz is seeking reappointment of a three-year term ending December 31, 2027. • Jill Anderson is not seeking reappointment. • Tim Nelson is not seeking reappointment. Page 2 of 2 Economic Development Commission (EDC) • Julie Gronquist is seeking reappointment for a one-year term ending December 31, 2025. • Jud Murchie is seeking appointment as Chair of the EDC for 2025. Attachments Attachment A: Resolution 2025-002 To view the final document, access adopted Resolutions via Arden Hills Public Laserfiche Weblink by visiting cityofardenhills.org and clicking on Archived Documents under Helpful Links on our main webpage. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2025-002 RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE APPOINTMENTS TO THE COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES OF THE CITY WHEREAS, the City Council annually appoints residents to serve in an advisory capacity to the City Council for planning and zoning issues on the Planning Commission; for parks, trails and recreation issues on the Parks, Trails, and Recreation Committee; and for the development and redevelopment in the City of Arden Hills on the Economic Development Commission; and WHEREAS, City Code Chapter 2, Section 220, Subsection 220.01, Subd. 7 and 7(A) states that Commission and Committee Members shall serve for a term of three (3) years and each Member may serve for no more than three (3) consecutive three-year terms. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Arden Hills City Council appoints/reappoints the following individuals to serve on the designated Commission with terms ending as noted: Planning Commission- Regular members: Joshua Collins, Chair 2025 – December 31, 2027 Ben Lindau (regular member) – December 31, 2026 Patrick Burlingame – December 31, 2027 Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee (PTRC): Dan Dietz – December 31, 2027 Economic Development Commission (EDC): Julie Gronquist – December 31, 2025 Jud Murchie, Chair 2025 ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS THIS 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025. ____________________________________ DAVID GRANT, MAYOR ATTEST: ______________________________________ JULIE HANSON, CITY CLERK Attachment A Page 1 of 1 CONSENT ITEM – 8D MEMORANDUM DATE: January 13, 2025 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Jessica Jagoe, Interim City Administrator FROM: Julie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk SUBJECT: Resignation of Frank Cupery from Economic Development Commission (EDC) Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: $ $ Council Should Consider Motions to approve, table, or deny the following: • Resignation of Frank Cupery from the Economic Development Commission (EDC). Background/Discussion On January 7, 2025, Frank Cupery submitted his resignation from the EDC to the group’s staff liaison. With the acceptance of Mr. Cupery’s resignation, the EDC will have five members plus one youth member. Please note the City’s December City newsletter included an article regarding the need for volunteers for our commissions/committees and the January/February newsletter will include reference for such as well. Budget Impact N/A Attachments N/A Page 1 of 2 CONSENT ITEM – 8E MEMORANDUM DATE: January 13, 2025 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Jessica Jagoe, Interim City Administrator FROM: Jen Estling, Deputy Clerk SUBJECT: Resolution 2025-003 - 2025 Curbside & Non-Curbside Recycling Fees Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A Council Should Consider Motion to approve, table or deny the following: • Resolution 2025-003 setting the 2025 Curbside and Non-Curbside Recycling Fees Background Republic Services will provide curbside recycling collection through May 4, 2025. The City will enter into a contract with Walters Recycling and Refuse to provide curbside recycling collection beginning May 5, 2025. The per unit annual fee for residents receiving curbside collection will be a blend of the rates in the previous contract with Republic Services and the new rates with Walters Recycling and Refuse. The recycling budget is an enterprise fund that receives revenues from the annual household fee that is applied to the property taxes and from the SCORE grant provided by Ramsey County. The majority of the expenses are for the collection services provided by Republic Services. Since there are no other dedicated funding sources, the revenue must be balanced with the expenses. Ramsey County typically requires recycling fees to be set by the end of November so they can add the amounts to the upcoming year’s property taxes. Due to the timing of our Recycling RFP and contract negotiations, Ramsey County extended that deadline to no later than January 17. Page 2 of 2 Discussion • Republic Services The annual fee for residents receiving curbside collection was set at $60.00 per year in 2024, which is the applicable fee for the remainder of the contract ending May 4, 2025. This amount equates to $5.00 per month, which will be assessed for January through the end of the contract. • Walters Recycling and Refuse Beginning May 5, 2025, the annual fee for residents receiving curbside collection will be $99.00 in 2025. This amount equates to $8.25 per month, which will be assessed for May 5 through December 31, 2025. The increase in the base fee for curbside recycling per household is necessary due to the change in recycling haulers which will increase the City’s cost to provide this service. Staff is proposing an increase in the annual fee for each housing unit that is not part of the curbside recycling program. Although these properties contract separately for regular recycling services, they can choose to opt-in with the City’s Hauler and will have access to the community cleanup event. The current fee is proposed to increase from $3.50 to $3.75 per year. This fee is applied to Cottage Villas, Hunters Park Condos, Parkshore Apartments, Arden Manor, E Street Flats, Arden Flats, Johanna Shores, New Perspectives and Round Lake Senior Living. Budget Impact The recycling budget is an enterprise fund that receives revenues from the annual household fee that is assessed to the property taxes and from the SCORE grant provided by Ramsey County. Most of the expenses are from the services provided by the Recycling Hauler. Since there are no other dedicated funding sources, the revenue must be balanced with the expenses. Attachments A. Resolution 2025-003 To view the final document, access adopted Resolutions via Arden Hills Public Laserfiche Weblink by visiting cityofardenhills.org and clicking on Archived Documents under Helpful Links on our main webpage. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2025-003 RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE SERVICE FEE CHARGE FOR THE 2025 RESIDENTIAL CURBSIDE RECYCLING PROGRAM WHEREAS, the City of Arden Hills has an established curbside recycling program in place for Arden Hills residents; and WHEREAS, the City will continue the program into the year 2025; and WHEREAS, the City Council of Arden Hills has entered into a Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) with Ramsey County to assess residential property owners fees to support the recycling program; and WHEREAS, the City of Arden Hills wishes to continue this funding mechanism. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arden Hills, Minnesota, that the funding rate for residential recycling for the year 2025 is hereby established at $99.00 per residential unit that is offered curbside recycling services, and $3.75 per residential unit that is not offered curbside recycling services. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS THIS 13th DAY OF JANUARY, 2025. David Grant, Mayor ATTEST: Julie Hanson, City Clerk To view the final document, access adopted Resolutions via Arden Hills Public Laserfiche Weblink by visiting cityofardenhills.org and clicking on Archived Documents under Helpful Links on our main webpage. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2025-003 RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE SERVICE FEE CHARGE FOR THE 2025 RESIDENTIAL CURBSIDE RECYCLING PROGRAM WHEREAS, the City of Arden Hills has an established curbside recycling program in place for Arden Hills residents; and WHEREAS, the City will continue the program into the year 2025; and WHEREAS, the City Council of Arden Hills has entered into a Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) with Ramsey County to assess residential property owners fees to support the recycling program; and WHEREAS, the City of Arden Hills wishes to continue this funding mechanism. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arden Hills, Minnesota, that the funding rate for residential recycling for the year 2025 is hereby established as follows: 1. Republic Services – January 1 through May 4, 2025 at $5.00 per month, per residential unit that is offered curbside recycling services. 2. Walters Recycling and Refuse – May 5 through December 31, 2025 at $8.25 per month, per residential unit that is offered curbside recycling services. 3. The funding rate for residential units that are not offered curbside recycling services is $3.75 per year, per residential unit. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS THIS 13th DAY OF JANUARY, 2025. David Grant, Mayor ATTEST: Julie Hanson, City Clerk Page 1 of 1 CONSENT ITEM – 8F MEMORANDUM DATE: January 13, 2025 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Jessica Jagoe, Interim City Administrator FROM: David Swearingen, P.E. Public Works Director / City Engineer SUBJECT: Complete Streets Policy Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A Council Should Consider Motions to approve, table, or deny the following: •Resolution 2025-004 declaring that it is the City of Arden Hills’ policy to utilize Complete Street principles in transportation planning and community design. Background/Discussion On June 24, 2024, the City Council reviewed the latest design estimates and status of funding sources and gave direction to staff to pursue the MnDOT SRTS grant program again. On December 9, 2024, City Council authorized Resolution 2024-058 to submit a MnDOT Safe Routes to School Infrastructure grant application related to the proposed Old Highway 10 Trail Improvement project. Through the MnDOT SRTS grant program application process last year, City Staff learned that the scoring could be improved if the City had an official Complete Streets Policy. Resolution 2025-004 declares that it is the City of Arden Hills’ policy to utilize Complete Street principles in transportation planning and community design. Complete Streets consist of the planning, scoping, design, construction, operation, and maintenance of roads in order to reasonably address the safety and accessibility needs of users of all ages and abilities. Complete streets consider the needs of motorists, pedestrians, transit users and vehicles, bicyclists, and commercial and emergency vehicles moving along and across roads, intersections, and crossings in a manner that is sensitive to the local context and recognizes that needs may vary throughout the community. Attachments Attachment A - Resolution 2025-004 Page 1 of 2 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2025-004 RESOLUTION DECLARING THAT IT IS THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS’S POLICY TO UTILIZE COMPLETE STREET PRINCIPLES IN TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DESIGN WHEREAS, Complete Streets consist of the planning, scoping, design, construction, operation, and maintenance of roads in order to reasonably address the safety and accessibility needs of users of all ages and abilities. Complete streets consider the needs of motorists, pedestrians, transit users and vehicles, bicyclists, and commercial and emergency vehicles moving along and across roads, intersections, and crossings in a manner that is sensitive to the local context and recognizes that needs may vary throughout the community; and WHEREAS, in 2013 the Minnesota Department of Transportation developed a statewide Complete Streets Program, which provides for the development of a balanced transportation system, through appropriate planning, that integrates multiple transportation modes, where appropriate, for transportation users of all types, ages and abilities; and WHEREAS, the City of Arden Hills supports Ramsey County’s adoption of the 2016 Ramsey County All Abilities Transportation Network Policy and its efforts to implement the policies; and WHEREAS, the City of Arden Hills has generally followed Complete Street principles in its planning and community design, and has demonstrated said commitment by adopting a transportation goal within the City’s Comprehensive Plan to provide well-designed and well- maintained community streets that balance the needs of all users, residents, businesses and property owners; and WHEREAS, Complete Streets is consistent with the Council supported principles of Active Living Ramsey County, to promote the integration of physical activity into the daily lives of Arden Hills residents; and WHEREAS, Complete Streets are designed, constructed and maintained to assure safety and accessibility for all the users of our roads, trails and transit systems, including pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders, motorists, commercial and emergency vehicles and for people of all ages and of all abilities; and WHEREAS, Complete Streets provide safe travel choices that encourage non-motorized transportation options, increase the overall capacity of the transportation network as well as decrease consumer transportation costs; and Attachment A Page 2 of 2 WHEREAS, Complete Streets will help Arden Hills reduce greenhouse gas emissions as more people choose an alternative to the single occupant vehicle, thereby improving air quality and alleviating public health concerns; and WHEREAS, Complete Streets support economic growth and community stability by providing accessible and efficient connections between home, school, work, recreation and retail destinations by improving the pedestrian and vehicular environments throughout communities; and WHEREAS, Complete Streets enhance safe walking and bicycling options for school- age children, in recognition of the objectives of the national Safe Routes to School program, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Physical Activity Guidelines; and WHEREAS, Complete Streets improve the quality of life within our community; and WHEREAS, Complete Streets may influence or help reduce crashes and injuries and their costs. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that in order to develop and maintain a safe, efficient, balanced and environmentally sound City transportation system for people of all ages and abilities, transportation and development projects shall incorporate a Complete Streets philosophy that expands transportation choices; and therefore BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arden Hills, Minnesota, that it is the City of Arden Hills’s policy to utilize complete streets principles and to work with MnDOT, Ramsey County, and appropriate agencies so that Complete Street elements are evaluated where possible for City transportation projects by providing appropriate accommodations for pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists, transit riders, and disabled persons through the ongoing creation of a multi-model transportation system. City Clerk To view the final document, access adopted Resolutions via Arden Hills Public Laserfiche Weblink by visiting cityofardenhills.org and clicking on Archived Documents under Helpful Links on our main webpage. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council January 13, 2025 City Administrator Mayor Attest: Page 1 of 2 DATE: January 13, 2025 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Jessica Jagoe, Interim City Administrator FROM: Lucas J. Miller - Assistant Public Works Director SUBJECT: Arden Manor and Floral Park Improvements – Final Payment #3 Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: $606,000 – Floral Park $1,133,786.07 CDBG Funds, PIR – Parks $249,700 – Arden Manor Council Should Consider Motions to approve, table, or deny the following: • Pay Request #3 and Final Payment for the Arden Manor Park and Floral Park Improvements Project to Peterson Companies, Inc. in the amount of $35,658.36. Background/Discussion On June 26, 2023, Council approved Resolution 2023-032, Accepting the Bid and Awarding the Arden Manor Park and Floral Park Improvements Project Contract to Peterson Companies in the amount of $816,523.35. At the June 20, 2023 Work Session, City Council directed staff to remove the Arden Manor hard court from the scope of the project and pursue future CDBG funds to apply towards construction in the future. Staff contacted Peterson Companies, Inc. to discuss the project scope change and agreed to a change order following award of the contract in the amount of -$115,649.89, which resulted in a new contract amount of $700,873.46. This Change Order #1 was approved by Council at the regular Council meeting on July 10, 2023. To complete the work in the field, there were some underruns and overruns of varying scopes of work due to actual site conditions which was approved by Council in Change Order #2 in an overall increase of $12,293.69 at the Council meeting on September 23, 2024. CONSENT ITEM – 8G MEMORANDUM Page 2 of 2 HR Green’s Recommendation Memo (Attachment A) includes the description of the final payment but in summary is a release of the total retainage. The project is fully complete in accordance with the contract and closeout documents have been received. Payment No. 3 is the final payment and is in the amount of $35,658.36. Staff recommends that Council approve Payment No. 3 and closeout the project. Budget Impact A summary of the project costs and funding sources to date is provided below: Arden Manor Floral TOTAL Engineering 71,742.88$ 52,287.12$ 124,030.00$ Contractor 343,721.24 472,802.11 816,523.35 Playground Equip 115,469.11 79,549.81 195,018.92 Shelter 41,006.00 27,964.00 68,970.00 Park Amenities 13,050.00 19,550.00 32,600.00 Change Order 1 (115,649.89) (115,649.89) Change Order 2 12,293.69 12,293.69 Actual Total 481,633.03$ 652,153.04$ 1,133,786.07$ Over CIP Budget $231,933.03 46,153.04$ $278,086.07 Attachments Attachment A: Recommendation Letter from HR Green Attachment B: Peterson Co. Pay Request #3/Final plus IC-134’s, Lien Waivers & Surety 2550 University Avenue West | Suite 400N St. Paul, MN 55114 Main 651.644.4389 + Fax 713.965.0044 HRGREEN.COM December 13, 2024 David Swearingen, P.E. Public Works Director/City Engineer City of Arden Hills 1245 West Highway 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112-5743 Re: Arden Manor Park and Floral Park Improvements Application for Payment #3 Dear David, In accordance with the Contract Documents, based on on-site observations and the data comprising this Application for Payment, the Engineer certifies to the Owner that to the best of the Engineer’s knowledge, information, and belief the Work has progressed as indicated, the quality of the Work is in accordance with the Contract Documents, and Peterson Companies, Inc. is entitled to payment of the AMOUNT DUE THIS APPLICATION for Application for Payment #3 and HR Green recommends approval of payment. Note that this Application for Payment is solely for release of retainage. The retainage release process requires the Contractor to provide some additional documentation as explained in SGC 15.06 “Final Payment” and S-34 “Contract Closeout Procedures” in the Project Manual. The Contractor has provided all required documentation, attached alongside this memo in the submittal email. Note that there were concerns with the subcontractor lien release waivers as provided, and after consultation with the Assistant Public Works Director and the City Attorney, it was concluded that the waivers are not needed at this point due to the extent of time elapsed since completion of the construction work, however they are being provided for reference to assist in answering any questions. We recommend releasing retainage because construction has been complete since June 2024, all the required accompanying documentation has been provided as noted above, and there is also a two-year maintenance guarantee / warranty period. Please let me know if you have any questions or need anything else. Sincerely, HR GREEN, INC Thomas Jantscher, PE Project Engineer Attachment A Co n t r a c t o r ' s A p p l i c a t i o n f o r P a y m e n t N o . 1. O R I G I N A L C O N T R A C T P R I C E . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2. N e t c h a n g e b y C h a n g e O r d e r s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 3. C u r r e n t C o n t r a c t P r i c e ( L i n e 1 ± 2 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 4. T O T A L C O M P L E T E D A N D S T O R E D T O D A T E ( C o l u m n F t o t a l o n P r o g r e s s E s t i m a t e s ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5. R E T A I N A G E : a. X $7 1 3 , 1 6 7 . 1 5 Wo r k C o m p l e t e d . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ b. X St o r e d M a t e r i a l . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ c. To t a l R e t a i n a g e ( L i n e 5 . a + L i n e 5 . b ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 6. A M O U N T E L I G I B L E T O D A T E ( L i n e 4 - L i n e 5 . c ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 7. L E S S P R E V I O U S P A Y M E N T S ( L i n e 6 f r o m p r i o r A p p l i c a t i o n ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 8. A M O U N T D U E T H I S A P P L I C A T I O N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 9. B A L A N C E T O F I N I S H , P L U S R E T A I N A G E ( C o l u m n G t o t a l o n P r o g r e s s E s t i m a t e s + L i n e 5 . c a b o v e ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ Co n t r a c t o r ' s C e r t i f i c a t i o n P a y m e n t o f : $ i s r e c o m m e n d e d b y : P a y m e n t o f : $ i s a p p r o v e d b y : Co n t r a c t o r S i g n a t u r e By : D a t e : A p p r o v e d b y : Ja c o b M o g a 6 / 3 0 / 2 0 2 4 Fu n d i n g o r F i n a n c i n g E n t i t y ( i f a p p l i c a b l e ) ( D a t e ) $3 5 , 6 5 8 . 3 6 (L i n e 8 o r o t h e r - a t t a c h e x p l a n a t i o n o f t h e o t h e r a m o u n t ) (O w n e r ) ( D a t e ) (E n g i n e e r ) ( D a t e ) TO T A L S $1 2 , 2 9 3 . 6 9 $ 1 1 5 , 6 4 9 . 8 9 $7 1 3 , 1 6 7 . 1 5 NE T C H A N G E B Y -$ 1 0 3 , 3 5 6 . 2 0 $3 5 , 6 5 8 . 3 6 CH A N G E O R D E R S $3 5 , 6 5 8 . 3 6 (L i n e 8 o r o t h e r - a t t a c h e x p l a n a t i o n o f t h e o t h e r a m o u n t ) $7 1 3 , 1 6 7 . 1 5 $7 1 3 , 1 6 7 . 1 5 Ch a n g e O r d e r 0 1 $ 1 1 5 , 6 4 9 . 8 9 $7 1 3 , 1 6 7 . 1 5 Ch a n g e O r d e r 0 2 $ 1 2 , 2 9 3 . 6 9 Ch a n g e O r d e r S u m m a r y Ap p r o v e d C h a n g e O r d e r s $8 1 6 , 5 2 3 . 3 5 Nu m b e r A d d i t i o n s D e d u c t i o n s -$ 1 0 3 , 3 5 6 . 2 0 Ow n e r ' s Pr o j e c t N o : Co n t r a c t o r ' s Pr o j e c t N o : 23 1 2 0 HR G r e e n Pr o j e c t : Ar d e n M a n o r P a r k F l o r a l P a r k Co n t r a c t : To ( O w n e r ) : Ci t y o f A r d e n H i l l s Fr o m (C o n t r a c t o r ) : Pe t e r s o n C o m p a n i e s , I n c . Vi a ( E n g i n e e r ) : 3 Ap p l i c a t i o n Pe r i o d : Re t e n t i o n Ap p l i c a t i o n D a t e : 6/ 3 0 / 2 0 2 4 Th e u n d e r s i g n e d C o n t r a c t o r c e r t i f i e s , t o t h e b e s t o f i t s k n o w l e dg e , t h e f o l l o w i n g : (1 ) A l l p r e v i o u s p r o g r e s s p a y m e n t s r e c e i v e d f r o m O w n e r o n ac c o u n t o f W o r k d o n e u n d e r t h e C o n t r a c t h a v e b e e n ap p l i e d o n a c c o u n t t o d i s c h a r g e C o n t r a c t o r ' s l e g i t i m a t e o b li g a t i o n s i n c u r r e d i n c o n n e c t i o n w i t h t h e W o r k c o v e r e d b y pr i o r A p p l i c a t i o n s f o r P a y m e n t ; (2 ) T i t l e t o a l l W o r k , m a t e r i a l s a n d e q u i p m e n t i n c o r p o r a t e d i n s ai d W o r k , o r o t h e r w i s e l i s t e d i n o r c o v e r e d b y t h i s Ap p l i c a t i o n f o r P a y m e n t , w i l l p a s s t o O w n e r a t t i m e o f p ay m e n t f r e e a n d c l e a r o f a l l L i e n s , s e c u r i t y i n t e r e s t s , a n d en c u m b r a n c e s ( e x c e p t s u c h a s a r e c o v e r e d b y a b o n d a c c e p t a b le t o O w n e r i n d e m n i f y i n g O w n e r a g a i n s t a n y s u c h Li e n s , s e c u r i t y i n t e r e s t , o r e n c u m b r a n c e s ) ; a n d 9/ 1 3 / 2 0 2 4 Attachment B Contractor Affidavit Submitted Thank you, your Contractor Affidavit has been approved. Confirmation Summary Confirmation Number:0-755-359-584 Submitted Date and Time:19-Aug-2024 9:42:53 AM Legal Name:PETERSON COMPANIES INC Federal Employer ID:41-1934913 User Who Submitted:jmiller@petersoncompanies.net Type of Request Submitted:Contractor Affidavit Affidavit Summary Affidavit Number:815714304 Minnesota ID:4235858 Project Owner:CITY OF ARDEN HILLS Project Number:23120 CITY PROJECT NO. 22-PARK-001 - FLORAL PARK 20- PARK-003 ARDEN MANOR PARK Project Begin Date:04-Aug-2023 Project End Date:04-Jun-2024 Project Location:1423 FLORAL DR W, ARDEN HILLS, MN Project Amount:$713,167.15 Subcontractor Summary Name ID Affidavit Number ADVANCED CONCRETE SAWING INC 4684667 1547620352 COURT SURFACES & REPAIR INC 6489794 1032245248 CURB MASTERS INC 2207114 333893632 HUSKY CONSTRUCTION 5047998 1371131904 TA SCHIFSKY & SONS INC 8648671 347000832 Important Messages A copy of this page must be provided to the contractor or government agency that hired you. Contact Us If you need further assistance, contact our Withholding Tax Division at 651-282-9999, (toll-free) 800-657-3594, or (email) withholding.tax@state.mn.us. Business hours are Monday through Friday 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Central Time. Please print this page for your records using the print or save functionality built into your browser. 8/19/24, 9:43 AM mndor.state.mn.us/tp/eservices/_/Retrieve/0/Dc/Tr_SB0ZQjh53X6mb0_l5Yw__?FILE__=Print2&PARAMS__=2941198394992853623 https://www.mndor.state.mn.us/tp/eservices/_/Retrieve/0/Dc/Tr_SB0ZQjh53X6mb0_l5Yw__?FILE__=Print2&PARAMS__=2941198394992853623 1/1 Contractor Affidavit Submitted Thank you, your Contractor Affidavit has been approved. Confirmation Summary Confirmation Number: 1-272-766-304 Submitted Date and Time: 14-Aug-2024 8:50:53 AM Legal Name: HUSKY CONSTRUCTION Federal Employer ID: 81-5485445 User Who Submitted: aprilboogren Type of Request Submitted: Contractor Affidavit Affidavit Summary Affidavit Number: 1371131904 Minnesota ID: 5047998 Project Owner: CITY OF ARDEN HILLS Project Number:20-PARK-003 & 22-PARK-001 (23120) ARDEN MANOR PARK & FLORAL PARK Project Begin Date: 10-Jul-2023 Project End Date: 11-Sep-2023 Project Location: ARDEN HILLS Project Amount: $7,765.00 Subcontractors: No Subcontractors Important Messages A copy of this page must be provided to the contractor or government agency that hired you. Contact Us If you need further assistance, contact our Withholding Tax Division at 651-282-9999, (toll-free) 800-657-3594, or (email) withholding.tax@state.mn.us. Business hours are Monday through Friday 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Central Time. Please print this page for your records using the print or save functionality built into your browser. Firefox https://www.mndor.state.mn.us/tp/eservices/_/Retrieve/0/Dc/cVfaRRJ... 1 of 1 8/14/2024, 8:51 AM 25th May C.A.O. 2370 East Highway 36North St Paul, MN 55109 24 Page 1 of 1 CONSENT ITEM – 8H MEMORANDUM DATE: January 13, 2025 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Jessica Jagoe, Interim City Administrator FROM: Lucas J. Miller - Assistant Public Works Director SUBJECT: Ramsey County (Formerly Ramsey County Conservation District) Shared Service Agreement Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: *Note: This is a pass-through cost Council Should Consider Motions to approve, table, or deny the following: • Approving the Shared Service Agreement with Ramsey County for 2025. Background/Discussion Since 2009, Ramsey County’s Soil and Water Conservation District has been assisting the City with inspections required by the City’s Grading and Erosion Control Permits under Chapter 15, Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance. Attached is the Shared Service Agreement between the City of Arden Hills and Ramsey County’s Soil and Water Conservation District to continue this service through 2025. There is no change from the 2024 contract, and the hourly rate remains at $80/hour. The charges are assessed back against the escrows collected under the Grading and Erosion permits issued. Staff is recommending approval of the Shared Service Agreement for 2025. Attachments Attachment A: Shared Service Agreement with Ramsey County SHARED SERVICE AGREEMENT CITY OF ARDEN HILLS RAMSEY COUNTY 1.0 Agreement. This Shared Service Agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into by and between the City of Arden Hills, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“City”); and Ramsey County (“County”), a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, on behalf of its Parks & Recreation Department – Soil & Water Conservation Division (SWCD), 2015 Van Dyke St., Maplewood, MN 55109. 2.0 Authorization. This Agreement is authorized pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes § Chapter 412, Minnesota Statutes §Chapter 103(C), and Minnesota Statutes §471.59. 3.0 Purpose. The City is requesting the County to provide personnel to perform erosion and sediment control permit inspections, reporting and enforcement services, as defined herein. 4.0 Terms. In consideration of the mutual undertakings herein expressed, the parties agree as follows: A. City Responsibility. The City will: 1. Accept, process, and maintain records in connection with Grading and Erosion Control Permit (“GEC Permit”) applications. 2. Collect and account for GEC Permit fees and escrows. 3. The completed GEC Permit application shall include the following information: a. Name, address and phone number of permittee. b. Description and expected duration of project. c. Any special considerations identified by the City. 4. Issue GEC Permit upon receipt of a positive recommendation from the County. GEC Permits shall be issued subject to compliance with approved Plans and Specifications and other conditions of approval recommended by the County or the City. 5. Authorize County to issue Stop Work Orders where appropriate. Attachment A 2 6. Compensate the County for services rendered by County staff at the County’s hourly rate (currently $80 per hour), including services rendered by County staff in connection with any litigation arising out of the issuance of a Stop Work Order at the direction of the City pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. The City acknowledges that the County’s hourly rate is adjusted annually. 7. County staff shall receive mileage reimbursement at the current IRS rate. B. County Responsibilities. The County will: 1. Provide inspections by qualified staff. Unless otherwise requested by the City, inspections shall be conducted during regular business hours, 8:00 AM – 4:30 PM, Monday to Friday, excluding State holidays. 2. Provide the following regular inspections for the sites identified by the City: a. Initial Best Management Practice inspection prior to site disturbance, as scheduled by the City. b. Weekly inspections during the period of site disturbance. c. Routine inspections after a 0.5-inch rainfall event. d. Re-inspection to verify that corrections have been made, as required by the City. 3. Provide the City with a copy of the inspection report within seventy- two (72) hours of the inspection. If a re-inspection identifies that corrections have not been made and enforcement action is needed, the County shall notify the City as soon as possible of the violation but, in all cases, within twenty-four (24) hours of the re-inspection. 4. Issue Stop Work Orders, as directed by the City, in those cases where GEC Permittees have not complied with the erosion and sediment control regulations and/or with the conditions attached to the GEC Permit. 5. Invoice the City on a quarterly basis for services rendered. 3 5.0 Indemnification. The City shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the County for any damages to third parties arising out of services provided by the County pursuant to the terms of this Agreement provided, however, that the City’s maximum liability shall be as stated in Minnesota Statutes §Chapter 466. 6.0 Amendment. This Agreement may not be amended without the written consent of each of the parties. 7.0 Termination. This Agreement shall be binding upon the parties from its effective date of January 1, 2025 until December 31, 2025 provided that either party may terminate this Agreement upon sixty (60) days written notice to the other party. 8.0 Effective Date. This Agreement shall become effective January 1, 2025. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and the County have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the date and year first above written. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, a Minnesota municipal corporation David Grant, MAYOR RAMSEY COUNTY, a political subdivision of the state of Minnesota By: Printed Name: Title: County Manager ______ By: Printed Name: Mark McCabe Title: Parks & Recreation Director______ 4 Approved as to form: By: Printed Name: Kathleen Ritter Title: Assistant County Attorney____ Arden Hills\Forms\Shared Service Agr.v11.doc Page 1 of 3 CONSENT ITEM – 8I MEMORANDUM DATE: January 13, 2025 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Jessica Jagoe, Interim City Administrator FROM: David Swearingen, P.E. Public Works Director / City Engineer Lucas J. Miller, Assistant Public Works Director SUBJECT: Payment to Ramsey County related to the roundabout project at Old Snelling and County Rd E & the Mounds View High School Trail project Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: See tables below See tables below MSA, PIR, Water Fund, Sanitary Sewer Fund, SRTS, State Bonding Bill Council Should Consider Motions to approve, table, or deny the following: • Payment to Ramsey County in the amount of $227,460.80 (Attachment A) per the Cooperative Agreement, PUBW2022-23R, for Right-of-Way Acquisition costs through December 2024. • Payment to Ramsey County in the amount of $1,354,707.10 per the Cooperative Agreement, PW2023-05, for the Construction Engineering fee and Construction Costs related to the roundabout at Old Snelling Avenue North and County Rd E/Lake Johanna Blvd project and the MVHS Trail on Lake Valentine Rd. Background/Discussion On January 9, 2023, the City Council entered into a Cooperative Agreement for Right-of-Way acquisition and design, PUBW2022-23R. On January 8, 2024, the City Council entered into a Cooperative and Maintenance Agreement, PUBW2023-05. These Agreements between the City of Arden Hills and Ramsey County are for the reconstruction of the intersection of Old Snelling Avenue North and County Road E/Lake Johanna Boulevard (Roundabout Project) and the construction of Mounds View High School Trail (MVHS Trail) on Old Snelling Avenue (County State Aid Highway 76) between County Rd E2 and Lake Valentine Road. Page 2 of 3 Attachment A is the Ramsey County invoice in the amount of $227,460.80 to cover the costs related to each property parcel affected by the project, easement acquisition, and administration fees. This invoice does not include any costs related to the Lindey’s Steakhouse parking lot construction. Attachment B is the Ramsey County invoice in the amount of $1,354,707.10 for the Construction Engineering fee and Construction Costs related to the roundabout at Old Snelling Avenue North and County Rd E/Lake Johanna Blvd project and the MVHS Trail on Lake Valentine Rd. City staff has reviewed the invoices above and recommends the City Council approve payment to Ramsey County accordingly. Budget Impact Below are cost tables related to the City’s items. As neither of these projects has been completed, the values presented are the best estimates based on as-bid costs and current contracts. Roundabout Costs Overall Project Costs As-bid costs Water & Sanitary sewer improvements (State Bonding Bill)$489,005 Street & Storm Sewer improvements (MSA)$444,642 Design & construction admin (PIR)$82,937 ROW acquisition & admin (*MSA)$471,898 Total City As-Bid Costs $1,488,482 Roundabout Budget vs. Actual Cost Funding Source Budget Actual Cost Over/(Under) State Bonding Bill $510,000 $451,646 -$58,354 MSA $450,000 $745,025 $295,025 PIR $0 $67,187 $67,187 Utility Fund $287,000 $0 -$287,000 Total $1,247,000 $1,263,858 $16,858 *The above right of way (ROW) acquisition costs were estimated at $471,898. The Lindey’s Steakhouse parking lot has been constructed, with actual costs to the City totaling $212,520.80. All ROW acquisition costs are MSA eligible for the roundabout project. Page 3 of 3 MVHS Trail Costs Funding Source As-bid costs Trail Improvements & construction admin (SRTS)$326,105 Street & construction admin (MSA)$33,998 Design (PIR)$200,963 ROW acquisition & admin (MSA)$71,122 Change Order No.1 through No. 4 $76,252 Change Order No. 5 $5,445 Total City As-Bid Costs $713,885 MVHS Budget vs. Actual Cost Funding Source Budget Actual Cost Over/(Under) SRTS $450,000 $328,104 -$121,896 MSA $0 $189,770 $189,770 PIR $200,000 $144,745 -$55,255 Total $650,000 $662,618 $12,618 Attachments Attachment A: Ramsey County invoice for ROW acquisition costs Attachment B: Ramsey County invoice for City Construction Engineering fees and Construction � RAMSEY COUNTY Public Works Please Remit To: Ramsey County Finance 121 7th Place East, Suite 4000 St Paul MN 55101 USA Bill To: ARDEN HILLS CITY OF 1245 WEST HWY 96 ARDEN HILLS MN 55112 United States INVOICE Invoice Number: Invoice Date: Page: Customer Number: Payment Terms: Due Date: AMOUNT DUE: PUBW-021560 12/23/24 1 of 1 004000 Immediate 12/23/24 227,460.80 USD Amount Remitted For billing questions, please call Line 1 Identifier Description Quantity UOM RECONSTRUCTION OF OLD SNELLING AVENUE AND COUNTY ROAD E --AGREEMENT PUBW2022-23R CITY OF ARDEN HILLS SHARE OF RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION COSTS THROUGH DECEMBER, 2024 CALCULATION: CITY OF ARDEN HILLS SHARE OF RIGHT OF WAY AS OF 12.17.24 = $329,212.05 LESS PREVIOUS INVOICES $101,751.25 AMOUNT DUE=$ 227,460.80 Subtotal: Amount Due: Unit Amt Please return the top portion of the invoice with your check payable to Ramsey County. Ramsey County invoices may be paid online! Please visit ramseycounty.us/Paylnvoices for more information. Original Net Amount 227,460.80 227,460.80 You will need your Customer Number and Invoice Number to complete your transaction. Attachment A � RAMSEY COUNTY Public Works Please Remit To: Ramsey County Finance 121 7th Place East, Suite 4000 St Paul MN 55101 USA Bill To: ARDEN HILLS CITY OF 1245 WEST HWY 96 ARDEN HILLS MN 55112 United States INVOICE Invoice Number: Invoice Date: Page: Customer Number: Payment Terms: Due Date: AMOUNT DUE: For billing questions, please call Line 1 2 Identifier Description Quantity UOM RECONSTRUCTION OF OLD SNELLING AVENUE AND COUNTY ROAD E & MOUNDS VIEW HIGH SCHOOL TRAIL ON OLD SNELLING -- AGREEMENT PW2023-05 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS SHARE OF COSTS THROUGH DECEMBER 2024 CALCULATION: CITY OF ARDEN HILLS SHARE OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT PAYMENTS THROUGH PAYMENT 8) = $1,288, 185.45 CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING FEES = $66,521.65 AMOUNT DUE= $1,354,707.10 Subtotal: Amount Due: PUBW-021555 12/23/24 1 of 1 004000 Immediate 12/23/24 1,354,707.10 USD Amount Remitted Unit Amt Original Net Amount 66,521.65 1,288, 185.45 1,354,707.10 1,354,707.10 Please return the top portion of the invoice with your check payable to Ramsey County. Ramsey County invoices may be paid online! Please visit ramseycounty.us/Paylnvoices for more information. You will need your Customer Number and Invoice Number to complete your transaction. Attachment B Page 1 of 1 CONSENT ITEM – 8J MEMORANDUM DATE: January 13, 2025 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Jessica Jagoe, Interim City Administrator FROM: Lucas J. Miller - Assistant Public Works Director SUBJECT: Metropolitan Council – Private I/I Program – Grant Agreement Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A MCES Council Should Consider Motions to approve, table, or deny the following: • Metropolitan Council 2025 Private Property Inflow and Infiltration (I/I) Grant Agreement No. SG-22729 Background/Discussion The 2025 Private I/I Grant Program for Met Council will provide $1.5 million in wastewater revenue to provide grants to private property owners to help with repairs that will remove and prevent clear water from entering the wastewater treatment system. The Minnesota Legislature amended Statute 471.342 to allow the Met Council to provide grant funding to local municipalities to assist private property owners with costs associated with repairing sewer infrastructure on their property. The City of Arden Hills is 1 of 24 municipalities that have applied for the program. Arden Hills requested $90,000 in grant funds but was awarded $41,000 as shown in the Grant Agreement. The Grant Agreement related to the MCES 2025 private property I/I program is provided as Attachment A. Approving the Agreement allows the City to begin the program for private property owners the first day of the month following the “Effective Date” as defined in the agreement. Budget Impact This program is reimbursed by Metropolitan Council, so there is no direct budget impact. Attachments Attachment A: MCES Grant Agreement No. SG-22729 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 2025 PRIVATE PROPERTY INFLOW AND INFILTRATION (I/I) GRANT AGREEMENT NO. SG-22729 This Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (ES) Funded Grant Agreement ("Grant Agreement") is entered into this [date of signature by both parties] between the Metropolitan Council, a public corporation and political subdivision of the State of Minnesota ("Met Council") and the City of Arden Hills, a municipal corporation ("Grantee"). RECITALS 1. In 2022, Minnesota Statutes 2020, section 471.342 was amended to authorize towns and political subdivisions to establish inflow and infiltration prevention programs and make loans or grants to property owners. 2. The Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (ES, Council) calculates the peak hourly flow discharge limit (I/I Goal) for each community connected to the metropolitan sanitary sewer disposal system. Wastewater flow that exceeds the respective I/I Goal is considered excessive flow. Communities that have a measured wastewater flow rate greater than 80 percent of the I/I Goal are eligible to apply for the Grant. 3. The Council authorizes its staff to enter into a private property inflow and infiltration grant agreement with local municipalities that are eligible for this grant program. GRANT AGREEMENT 1. Term of Grant Agreement. 1.1. Effective Date. The effective date of this Grant Agreement is the date on which the Grant Agreement has been duly executed by both parties. 1.2. Grant Activity Period. The first day of the month following the Effective Date through and including the expiration date. 1.3. Expiration Date. The latter of (i) 2 years after final distribution of funds to Grantee; or (ii) until all obligations have been satisfactorily fulfilled, whichever occurs first. 1.4. Survival of Terms. The following clauses survive the expiration, termination, or cancellation of this Grant Agreement; 9. Liability and Insurance; 10. Audits; 11. Government Data Practices; 13. Data Availability; 14. Governing Law, Jurisdiction and Venues; 16. Data Disclosure; 18. Future Eligibility. 2. Duties, Representations and Warranties of Grantee and Use of Grant Funds. 2.1. The Grantee agrees to conduct, administer, and complete in a satisfactory manner the program ("Grantee Program") which is described in Grantee's application to Met Council for assistance under the Met Council's Private Inflow and Infiltration grant program, which application is incorporated into this Grant Agreement as Exhibit A (Grant Application), and in accordance with the terms and conditions of Attachment A 2 this Grant Agreement. Specifically, the Grantee agrees to perform the “Grant Program” in accordance with a specific timeline, all as described in Exhibit A (Grant Application) and to undertake the financial responsibilities described in Exhibit A (Grant Application) to this Grant Agreement. The Grantee has the responsibility for and obligation to complete the “Grant Program” as described in Exhibit A (Grant Application). The Met Council makes no representation or warranties with respect to the success and effectiveness of the “Grant Program”. The Met Council acknowledges that “Grant Program “work may be limited to soliciting participation by building owners in the “Grant Program” and requires additional work by the Grantee only to the extent that building owners choose to participate in the “Grant Program”, all as described in the Grantee's application attached as Exhibit A (Grant Application). The Grant Funds cannot be used for: • Normal municipal operating or overhead costs, including such related to the Grant Program; • Grantee's own public sewer infrastructure costs; • The cost of studies; • Engineering costs; • Planning costs; and • For equipment, machinery, supplies or other property to conduct the Grant Program, except for equipment, supplies or other property which is used primarily for the Grant Program and is specifically listed in Exhibit A (Grant Application). 2.2. Grantee Representations and Warranties. The Grantee further covenants with and represents and warrants to Met Council, as follows: A. It has the legal authority to enter into, execute and deliver this Grant Agreement and all documents referred to herein, has taken all actions necessary to its execution and delivery of such documents and has provided to Met Council a copy of the resolution by its governing body which authorizes Grantee to enter into this Agreement, to undertake the Private Property I/I Grant Program, including the Grantee financial responsibilities as shown in Exhibit A (Grant Application) and which also designates an authorized representative for the Grant Program who is authorized to provide certifications required in this Grant Agreement and submit pay claims for reimbursement of Grantee Program costs. B. It has legal authority to conduct and administer the Grant Program and use the Grant Funds for the purpose or purposes described in this Agreement. C. This Grant Agreement and all other documents referred to herein are the legal, valid and binding obligations of the Grantee enforceable against the Grantee in accordance with their respective terms. D. It will comply with all the terms, conditions, provisions, covenants, requirements, and warranties in this Agreement, and all other documents referred to herein. E. It has made no materially false statement or misstatement of fact in connection with the Grant Funds, and all the information it has submitted or will submit to the Council relating to the Grant Funds or the disbursement of any of the Grant Funds is and will be true and correct. It agrees that all representations contained in its application for the Private I/I Grant are material representations of fact 3 upon which the Council relied in awarding this Grant and are incorporated into this Agreement by reference. F. It is not in violation of any provisions of its charter or of the laws of the State of Minnesota, and there are no material actions, suits, or proceedings pending, or to its knowledge threatened, before any judicial body or governmental authority against or affecting it and is not in default with respect to any order, writ, injunction, decree, or demand of any court or any governmental authority which would impair its ability to enter into this Grant Agreement or any document referred to herein, or to perform any of the acts required of it in such documents. G. Neither the execution and delivery of this Grant Agreement or any document referred to herein nor compliance with any of the terms, conditions, requirements, or provisions contained in any of such documents is prevented by, is a breach of, or will result in a breach of, any term, condition, or provision of any agreement or document to which it is now a party or by which it is bound. H. The Grantee will not violate any applicable zoning or use statute, ordinance, building code, rule or regulation, or any covenant or agreement of record relating thereto. J. The Grant Program will be conducted in full compliance with all applicable laws, statutes, rules, ordinances, and regulations issued by any federal, state, or other political subdivisions having jurisdiction over the Grant Program. K. It has complied with the financial responsibility requirements contained in Exhibit A (Grant Application). L. The Grant Program will be conducted substantially in accordance with Exhibit A (Grant Application) by the Completion Date as stated in Exhibit A (Grant Application). M. It shall furnish such satisfactory evidence regarding the representations described herein as may be required and requested by the Met Council. 3. Time. Grantee must comply with all time requirements described in this Grant Agreement. 4. Eligible Costs. Eligible costs are those costs incurred by parties within the jurisdiction of the Grantee generally only for sewer service lateral repairs or replacements and foundation drain disconnections as described in Exhibit A (Grant Application). The Grantee shall not be reimbursed for non-eligible costs. Any cost not defined as an eligible cost or not included in the Grant Program or approved in writing by the Council is a non-eligible cost. 5. Consideration and Payment. 5.1 The Met Council will reimburse Grantee for eligible costs performed by the Grantee during the Grant Period in an amount of up to the prequalified work’s grant amount ("Grant Amount"). The Met Council shall bear no responsibility for any cost overruns that may be incurred by the Grantee or subrecipients of any tier in the performance of the Grantee Program. The initial Grant amount to Grantee under this Grant Agreement is $41,000. 4 5.2. Advance. The Met Council will make no advance of the Grant Amount to Grantee. The disbursement of the Grant Amount shall be in the form of reimbursement for eligible costs as provided ahead in this Section 5. 5.3. Payment. To obtain payment under this Grant Agreement, the Grantee shall submit a Reimbursement Request/Progress Report on forms provided by or acceptable to the Met Council. Reimbursement Request/Progress Reports may be submitted once per quarter after this grant agreement has been executed. The Grantee shall describe its compliance with its the financial requirements and construction work completed and specific addresses where work was undertaken in connection with the grant and shall provide sufficient documentation of grant eligible expenditures and such other information as the Met Council’s staff reasonably requests. The Met Council will promptly pay the Grantee after the Grantee presents to the Met Council a Reimbursement Request/Progress Report and an itemized invoice for all eligible services actually performed and the Met Council’s Authorized Representative accepts the invoiced services. 6. Conditions of Payment. 6.1. The Grantee must certify to the Council that work at each site for which payment is requested is done, that Grantee has received receipts for such work, that the work was not performed in violation of federal, Met Council, or local law or regulation and that Grantee has issued the appropriate permits for the work completed in the Grant Program. 6.2. Conditions Precedent to Any Reimbursement Request. The obligation of the Met Council to make reimbursement payments hereunder shall be subject to the following conditions precedent: A. The Met Council shall have received a Reimbursement Request/Progress Report for such amount of funds being requested for which the amounts for each individual site have been pre-qualified by Met Council. B. The Met Council shall have received evidence upon request, and in form and substance acceptable to the Met Council, that (i) the Grantee has legal authority to and has taken all actions necessary to enter into this Agreement and (ii) this Agreement is binding on and enforceable against the Grantee. C. No Event of Default under this Grant Agreement or event which would constitute an Event of Default but for the requirement that notice be given or that a period of grace or time elapse shall have occurred and be continuing. D. The Grantee has supplied to the Met Council all other items that the Met Council may reasonably require to assure good fiscal oversight of this grant program. 7. Authorized Representative. The Met Council’s Authorized Representative is: Name: Ward Brown or successor Title: Principal Financial Analyst, ES Finance Mailing Address: 390 North Robert Street St. Paul, MN 55101 5 Phone: (651) 602-1263 E-Mail Address: ward.brown@metc.state.mn.us or his successor and has the responsibility to monitor the Grantee’s performance and the authority to accept the services provided under this grant contract. If the services are satisfactory, the Met Council’s Authorized Representative will certify acceptance on each invoice submitted for payment. The Grantee’s Authorized Representative is: Name: Lucas Miller Mailing Address: 1245 West Highway 96, Arden Hills, MN 55112 Phone: (651) 792-7846 E-Mail Address: lmiller@cityofardenhills.org If the Grantee’s Authorized Representative changes at any time during this Grant Agreement, the Grantee must immediately notify the Met Council and within 30 days provide a new City resolution (if such resolution is necessary) specifying the new Representative. 8. Assignment, Amendments, Waiver, and Grant contract Complete. 8.1 Assignment. The Grantee may neither assign nor transfer any rights or obligations under this Grant Agreement without the prior consent of the Met Council and a fully executed Assignment Agreement, executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved this Grant Agreement, or their successors in office. 8.2 Amendments. Any amendment to this Grant Agreement must be in writing and will not be effective until it has been executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved the original Grant Agreement, or their successors, or their delegatee in office. 8.3 Waiver. If the Met Council fails to enforce any provision of this Grant Agreement, that failure does not waive the provision or its right to enforce it. 8.4 Grant Contract Complete. This Grant Agreement contains all negotiations and agreements between the Met Council and the Grantee. No other understanding regarding this Grant Agreement, whether written or oral, may be used to bind either party. 9. Liability and Insurance. 9.1 The Grantee and the Met Council agree that they will, subject to any indemnifications provided herein, be responsible for their own acts and the results thereof to the extent authorized by law, and they shall not be responsible for the acts of the other party and the results thereof. The liability of the Met Council is governed by the provisions contained in Minn. Stat. Chapter 466 as it may be amended, modified or replaced from time to time. The liability of the Grantee, including but not limited to the indemnification provided under Section 9.2 is governed by the provisions contained in such Chapter 466. 9.2 Indemnification by the Grantee. The Grantee shall bear all losses, expenses (including attorneys' fees) and damages in connection with Grantee’s administration of the Grant Program and agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Met Council, its agents, servants and employees from all claims, demands and judgments made or recovered against the Met Council, its agents, servants and employees, because of bodily injuries, including death at any time resulting therefrom, or because of damages to 6 property, or others (including loss of use) from any cause whatsoever, arising out of, incidental to, or in connection with the Grant Program whether or not due to any act of omission or commission, including negligence of the Grantee or any contractor or their employees, servants or agents, and whether or not due to any act of omission or commission (excluding, however, negligence or breach of statutory duty) of the Met Council, its employees, servants or agents. Grantee further agrees to indemnify, save and hold the Met Council, its agents and employees, harmless from all claims arising out of, resulting from, or in any manner attributable to any violation by the Grantee, its officers, employees, or agents, or any provision of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, including legal fees and disbursements paid or incurred to enforce the provisions contained in Section 11. The Grantee's liability hereunder shall not be limited to the extent of insurance carried by or provided by the Grantee, or subject to any exclusions from coverage in any insurance policy. For the avoidance of doubt, this provision does not impact the Grantee’s liability limits established in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466. The Grantee shall maintain or require to be maintained adequate insurance coverage for the Grant Program in such amounts with such limits as it determines in good faith to be reasonable or in such amounts and with such limits as may be reasonably required for participating cities by the Met Council from time to time. 9.3 Relationship of the Parties. Nothing contained in this Grant Agreement is intended or should be construed in any manner as creating or establishing the relationship of co-partners or a joint venture between the Grantee and the Met Council, nor shall the Grantee be considered or deemed to be an agent, representative, or employee of the Met Council in the performance of this Grant Agreement, or the Grant Program. The Grantee represents that it has already or will secure or cause to be secured all personnel, including any third-party contractor required for the performance of this Grant Agreement and the Grant Program. All personnel of the Grantee or other persons while engaging in the performance of this Grant Agreement the Grant Program shall not have any contractual relationship with the Met Council related to the work of the Grant Program and shall not be considered employees of the Met Council. In addition, all claims that may arise on behalf of said personnel or other persons out of employment or alleged employment including, but not limited to, claims under the Workers’ Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota, claims of discrimination against the Grantee, its officers, agents, contractors, or employees shall in no way be the responsibility of the Met Council. Such personnel or other persons shall not require nor be entitled to any compensation, rights or benefits of any kind whatsoever from the Met Council, including but not limited to, tenure rights, medical and hospital care, sick and vacation leave, disability benefits, severance pay and retirement benefits. 10. Audits. Under Minn. Stat. § 16C.05, subd. 5, the Grantee’s books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices relevant to this grant contract are subject to examination by the Met Council and/or the State Auditor or Legislative Auditor, as appropriate, for a minimum of six years from the termination date of this Grant Agreement. 7 11. Government Data Practices. The Grantee and Met Council must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat. Chapter 13, as it applies to all data provided by the Met Council under this grant contract, and as it applies to all data created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by the Grantee under this Grant Agreement. The civil remedies of Minn. Stat. § 13.08 apply to the release of the data referred to in this clause by either the Grantee or the Met Council. If the Grantee receives a request to release the data referred to in this Clause, the Grantee must immediately notify the Met Council. 12. Workers’ Compensation. The Grantee certifies that it is in compliance with Minn. Stat. § 176.181, subd. 2, pertaining to workers’ compensation insurance coverage. The Grantee’s employees and agents will not be considered Met Council employees. Any claims that may arise under the Minnesota Workers Compensation Act on behalf of these employees and any claims made by any third party as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of these employees are in no way the Met Council’s obligation or responsibility. 14. Governing Law, Jurisdiction, and Venue. Minnesota law, without regard to its choice-of-law provisions, governs this Grant Agreement. Venue for all legal proceedings out of this grant contract, or its breach, must be in the appropriate state or federal court with competent jurisdiction in Ramsey County, Minnesota. 15. Termination. Either Party may cancel this Grant Agreement at any time, with or without cause, upon 30 days’ written notice to the Grantee. Upon termination, the Grantee will be entitled to payment for services prequalified and satisfactorily performed before the termination notice. 16. Data Disclosure. Under Minn. Stat. § 270C.65, subd. 3, and other applicable law, the Grantee consents to disclosure of its federal employer tax identification number, and/or Minnesota tax identification number, already provided to the Met Council, to federal and state tax agencies and Met Council personnel involved in the payment of Met Council obligations. Grantee will require compliance with this Section 16 by Grantee’s contractor and shall submit evidence of such compliance to Met Council as requested. 17. Notices. In addition to any notice required under applicable law to be given in another manner, any notices required hereunder must be in writing and shall be sufficient if personally served or sent by prepaid, registered, or certified mail (return receipt requested), to the business address of the party to whom it is directed. Such business address shall be that address specified below or such different address as may hereafter be specified, by either party by written notice to the other: To the Grantee at: City of Arden Hills 1245 West Highway 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112 Attention: Lucas Miller 8 To the Met Council at: Metropolitan Council 390 Robert Street North St. Paul, MN 55101 Attention: Ward Brown, Principal Financial Analyst With copy to: ES Budget Manager Metropolitan Council Environmental Services 390 Robert Street North St. Paul, MN 55101 18. Prevailing Wages The Grantee agrees to comply with all applicable provisions contained in chapter 177 of the Minnesota Statutes, and specifically those provisions contained in Minn. Stat. §§ 177.41 through 177.435, as they may be amended, modified or replaced from time to time with respect to the Grantee Program. By agreeing to this provision, the Grantee is not acknowledging or agreeing that the cited provisions apply to the Grantee Program. 19. Default and Remedies. 19.1 Defaults. The Grantee's failure to fully comply with all of the provisions contained in this Grant Agreement shall be an event of default hereunder ("Event of Default"). 19.2. Remedies. Upon an event of default, the Met Council may exercise any one or more of the following remedies: a. Refrain from disbursing the Grant; b. Demand that all or any portion of the Grant already disbursed be repaid to it, and upon such demand the Grantee shall repay such amount to the Met Council. c. Enforce any additional remedies the Met Council may have at law or in equity. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives on or as of the date first above written. 9 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL By: ________________________________ Regional Administrator, successor, or delegate Date: _______________________________ GRANTEE: The Grantee certifies that the appropriate person(s) have executed the grant contract on behalf of the Grantee as required by applicable articles, bylaws, resolutions, or ordinances. By: ________________________________ _____________________________________ Printed Name and Title Date: _______________________________ Page - 1 PRIVATE PROPERTY INFLOW & INFILTRATION GRANT PROGRAM (Exhibit A) Application for Participation - 2025 Information This form provides the basis for entering into an agreement with the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (Met Council, ES) for the Private Property Inflow & Infiltration (I/I) Grant Program for 2025. Completion of this form and its attachments confirms your municipality’s intention to participate and verifies that the municipality has performed all required activities to receive grant funding for private residential I/I mitigation work. More information on the grant program, including program guidelines, can be found at the following link: https://metrocouncil.org/Wastewater-Water/Funding-Finance/Available-Funding-Grants/Private- Property-Inflow-and-Infiltration-Grants.aspx Grant Application Municipality Name: City of Arden Hills Date: 11/22/2024 Designated Contact (all correspondence and municipality responsibility regarding participation in the program should be addressed to the individual named below): Name: Lucas Miller Address: 1245 West Highway 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112 Phone Number: 651-792-7846 Email: lmiller@citofardenhills.org Requested Grant Amount: $90,000 *Recent data suggests an average lining cost of $9,000 per sewer lateral A resolution from Council confirming this individual’s authority and certification that they have read the program guidelines and support participation in the program must be submitted. Is a resolution attached: ☐Yes ☒No (Scheduled for December 9th approval) Page - 2 | METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Do you plan to solicit bids from MCUB businesses? ☐Yes ☒No ☒Check here for acknowledgement of Met Council MCUB approved businesses list. If you plan to consider an equity component in your grant fund distributions, please provide a statement explaining how you plan to do this: Arden Hills plans to implement an equity component, at a Work Session City Council will review how other cities addressed equity and will determine the method for Arden Hills. Please provide a statement explaining how you plan to do outreach and communication to reach private property owners. We found success in our process last year by announcing the program at public meetings, sharing information on social media and the city newsletter and providing a page on the city website. What, if any, outreach and communication support would be helpful to receive from Met Council? We will be using previous information provided last year, no additional requests needed. Page 1 of 1 DATE: January 13, 2025 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Jessica Jagoe, Interim City Administrator SUBJECT: Hiring of Permit Technician/Office Support Specialist Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A Council Should Consider Motions to approve, table, or deny the following: • The hiring of a Maria Jimenez to the position of Permit Technician/Office Support Specialist at Grade 8 Step 3, at Year 0 on the PTO scale, all other normal City benefits apply. Discussion The City has a vacant Permit Tech/Office Support role, following a recruitment process, Maria Jimenez has been selected for Council consideration. She comes with nearly six years of experience in a similar role with another City. Budget Impact This role is currently budgeted for and this hiring will not adversely affect the budget. Attachment N/A CONSENT ITEM – 8K MEMORANDUM Page 1 of 1 CONSENT ITEM – 8L MEMORANDUM DATE: January 13, 2025 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Jessica Jagoe, Interim City Administrator SUBJECT: Accept Resignation of Senior Communications Coordinator Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A Council Should Consider Motion to approve, table or deny the following: • Resignation of the Senior Communications Coordinator. Background The current Senior Communications Coordinator has submitted their resignation with a last day of January 17, this item will officially accept their resignation. A separate item regarding recruitment will be brought forward under New Business. Budget Impact None. Attachments N/A Page 1 of 2 CONSENT ITEM – 8M MEMORANDUM DATE: January 13, 2025 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Jessica Jagoe, Interim City Administrator FROM: David Swearingen, P.E. Public Works Director / City Engineer SUBJECT: Resolution Approving Plans & Specifications and Order Advertisement for Bids for the 2025 CIPP Lining Project Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: $475,000 TBD Sanitary Sewer Fund, MCES I/I Council Should Consider Motions to approve, table, or deny the following: • Adopting Resolution 2025-010 Approving Plans and Specifications and Ordering Advertisement for Bids for the 2025 CIPP Lining Project. Background/Discussion The 2025 – 2029 Capital Improvement Program identifies improvements of the 2025 Cured In- Place Pipe (CIPP) Lining project scheduled for construction in the year 2025. The City Council approved professional services with engineering consultant, TKDA, to prepare construction plans and specifications on November 12, 2024. The proposed project includes inflow and infiltration repairs to the existing sanitary sewer within the Glenarden neighborhood. Through the Public Works’ sanitary sewer maintenance program, inspections identified the proposed segments of sewer needing repairs due to significant cracks or voids, root intrusion and also aging clay pipe (VCP) that indicated a need for rehabilitation. Through the CIPP process, I & I is eliminated at the joints and cracks of the existing pipe and the new lining is known to extend the life of the pipe by at least 50 years. Page 2 of 2 Adoption of Resolution 2025-010 will approve the plans and specification and order bid advertisement for the 2025 CIPP Lining project. Bids would be received on February 4, 2025, and presented to the City Council on February 10, 2025, with an appropriate resolution to award the construction contract. This schedule will allow for construction to begin this summer and a final construction completion date of December 15, 2025. Staff recommends adoption of Resolution 2025-010 as provided in Attachment A. A copy of selected sheets of the project plan set is provided in Attachment B. The project manual consists of 406 pages. A full copy of project manual is on file and available upon request to the City Clerk. Budget Impact A summary of the estimated project costs and funding sources is provided below: Total Estimated Costs Construction (Primary) $ TBD *Construction (Alternate) $ TBD Engineering Services $ 70,000 TOTAL $ TBD Total Estimated Funding Sanitary Sewer Utility Fund $ 475,000 TOTAL $ 475,000 The City is participating in the 2023 Metropolitan Council (MCES) Public Inflow and Infiltration Grant program. Roughly 25% of the construction costs from this project will be eligible for reimbursement at the end of the program cycle in 2026. City staff recommended adding an Alternative construction bid to the project after site inspections identified a culvert crossing within the project area could be rehabilitated via CIPP. The culvert crossing located across Glenarden Ct., the material consists of corrugated metal pipe and is deteriorating. This Alternative is estimated over budget; however, staff recommends keeping it in the bid packet to receive a bid price and then decide whether or not to accept it. Final total expenses and funding amounts will be revised and presented to the City Council upon receipt of construction bids. Attachments Attachment A – Resolution 2025-010 Attachment B - 2025 CIPP Lining plan set 1 To view the final document, access adopted Resolutions via Arden Hills Public Laserfiche Weblink by visiting cityofardenhills.org and clicking on Archived Documents under Helpful Links on our main webpage. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2025-010 RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING THE ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS WHEREAS, the Public Works Department has prepared plans and specifications for Improvement Project No. PW-25-0103, 2025 CIPP Lining for sanitary sewer inflow and infiltration improvements in the Glenarden neighborhood. The plans and specifications have been presented to the council for approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisements shall be published for 21 days, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that the bids will be received by the clerk until 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, February 4, 2025, at which time they will be publicly opened in the council chambers of the city hall by the City Clerk, will then be tabulated, and will be considered by the council at 7:00 p.m. on February 10, 2025, in the council chambers of the city hall. Any bidder whose responsibility is questioned during the consideration of the bid will be given an opportunity to address the council on the issue of responsibility. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the City Clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier’s check, bid bond, or certified check payable to the city for five (5) percent of the amount of such bid. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS THIS 13th DAY OF JANUARY 2025. ________________________________ Mayor Attest: ______________________________ City Clerk Attachment A K:\a-f\ArdenHills\22335000\04_Production\01_CAD\02_Sheets\1 TITLE SHEET1.dwg Jan 07, 2025 - 5:33pm DE S C R I P T I O N O F R E V I S I O N S NO . DA T E BY DE S I G N E D DR A W N CH E C K E D DR A W I N G N O . PR O J . N O . ® FILENAME: PLOT DATE: NA M E : SI G N A T U R E : LI C . N O . : DA T E : CI T Y O F A R D E N H I L L S 1 TI T L E S H E E T LP P ID R MO B LA R R Y P O P P L E R 41 0 0 5 1/ 8 / 2 0 2 5 -- - -- - -- - -- - I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S P L A N , S P E C I F I C A T I O N , O R RE P O R T W A S P R E P A R E D B Y M E O R U N D E R M Y D I R E C T SU P E R V I S I O N A N D T H A T I A M A D U L Y L I C E N S E D PR O F E S S I O N A L EN G I N E E R U N D E R T H E L A W S O F T H E S T A T E O F MI N N E S O T A . 20 2 5 C I P P L I N I N G 22 3 3 5 . 0 0 0 CO U N T Y R O A D E RA I L W A Y SC A L E I N F E E T 0 50 0 50 0 10 0 0 CI T Y O F A R D E N H I L L S , M I N N E S O T A CO N S T R U C T I O N P L A N S F O R 20 2 5 C I P P L I N I N G CI T Y P R O J . N O . P W - 2 5 - 0 1 0 3 SP E C I F I C A T I O N R E F E R E N C E EX I S T I N G U T I L I T Y L O C A T I O N S TH E 2 0 2 0 E D I T I O N O F T H E M I N N E S O T A DE P A R T M E N T O F T R A N S P O R T A T I O N "S T A N D A R D S P E C I F I C A T I O N S F O R H I G H W A Y CO N S T R U C T I O N " , D I V I S I O N S I I & I I I , A N D A L L AM E N D M E N T S T H E R E T O , S H A L L G O V E R N . TH E 2 0 2 3 E D I T I O N O F T H E C I T Y E N G I N E E R S AS S O C I A T I O N O F M I N N E S O T A " S T A N D A R D SP E C I F I C A T I O N S " , S H A L L G O V E R N U T I L I T Y CO N S T R U C T I O N . AL L T R A F F I C C O N T R O L D E V I C E S S H A L L CO N F O R M T O T H E L A T E S T E D I T I O N O F T H E MI N N E S O T A M A N U A L O N U N I F O R M T R A F F I C CO N T R O L D E V I C E S , I N C L U D I N G T H E L A T E S T FI E L D M A N U A L F O R T E M P O R A R Y T R A F F I C CO N T R O L Z O N E L A Y O U T S . UT I L I T Y I N F O R M A T I O N S H O W N O N T H I S PL A N H A S B E E N P R O V I D E D B Y T H E UT I L I T Y O W N E R . T H E C O N T R A C T O R SH A L L F I E L D V E R I F Y E X A C T L O C A T I O N S PR I O R T O C O M M E N C I N G C O N S T R U C T I O N AS R E Q U I R E D B Y S T A T E L A W . N O T I F Y GO P H E R S T A T E O N E C A L L 1 - 8 0 0 - 2 5 2 - 1 1 6 6 TH E S U B S U R F A C E U T I L I T Y I N F O R M A T I O N IN T H I S P L A N I S U T I L I T Y Q U A L I T Y L E V E L D. T H I S U T I L I T Y Q U A L I T Y W A S DE T E R M I N E D A C C O R D I N G T O T H E GU I D E L I N E S O F C I / A S C E 3 8 - 2 2 , E N T I T L E D , "S T A N D A R D G U I D E L I N E S F O R IN V E S T I G A T I N G A N D D O C U M E N T I N G EX I S T I N G U T I L I T I E S " . DR A W I N G I N D E X 1 TI T L E S H E E T 2 SI T E M A P , N O T E S A N D E S T I M A T E D Q U A N T I T I E S PR O J E C T LO C A T I O N SE E S H E E T 2 F O R MO R E D E T A I L S BE T H E L UN I V E R S I T Y LA K E J O H A N N A LA K E J O H A N N A B L V D SNELLING AVE N (MN 51) SNELL I N G A V E N OLD H W Y 1 0 N AR D E N P L FO R E S T L N SK I L E S L N SKILES L N GLENARDEN RD PASCAL LN CP K C Attachment B SN SN SN SN SNSN SN SN SN SN SNSN SN SN SN SN SN SNSNSN SN SN SN SN SNSNSN SN SN SN SN SNSNSNSN SN SN SN SN SN SNSN SN SN SN SN SN SN SN SN SN SN SN SN SN SN SN SN SN SN SNSNSN SN SN SNSN SN SN SN SN SN SN SN >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >> >> > > > > >>>>>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> >> >>>> > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> SN > > >> >> SN E L L I N G A V E ( M N 5 1 ) ARDEN PL FOREST LN SKILES LN GL E N A R D E N C T SKILE S L N AR D E N P L COUNTY ROAD E S N E L L I N G A V E N HA M L I N E A V E N AR D E N O A K S D R PA S C A L A V E ARDEN OAKS CT ARDEN OAKS DR AMBLE RD O L D H I G H W A Y 1 0 N CPKC R A I L W A Y GL E N A R D E N R D 1369 1373 35 4 9 35 5 2 35 4 4 35 3 8 35 3 0 35 2 2 35 0 8 35 0 0 34 8 4 34 6 6 34 5 4 34 5 2 34 4 8 34 4 4 34 4 0 138513931401 13701386139414001404 14151421 142 9 143 1 1408 1400 1378 35 0 5 LINDEY'S PARK FREEWAY PARK ARDEN OAKS PARK 8-127 8-133 8-142 8-141 8-135 8-136 8-137 8-138 8-139 8-148 8-056 8-055 8-147 1 4 5 4 1 4 5 0 3 4 2 7 3 4 2 1 1 4 5 8 1455 1 4 6 5 3 4 6 1 3 4 5 9 34 3 6 144 5 143 3 141 7 1407 1401 1385 1377 137613841392140014061414 1420 1428 14 3 4 1450 1448 1451 143 7 143 1 142 3 1419 1417 1411 1405 1399 1391 1383 1377 1434 1426 1420 1412 1404 1400 1392 356 4 356 8 357 4 358 0 359 0 3 5 4 4 36 0 9 36 2 3 36 3 1 36 3 2 36 2 0 1435 8-1288-129 8-130 8-131 8-132 8-161 8-162 8-163 8-164 8-157 8-121 8-122 8-123 8-124 8-125 8-114 8-114A 8-126 8-134 8-150 8-149 8-147A 34 4 5 34 3 8 34 2 6 34 5 5 34 4 7 K: \ a - f \ A r d e n H i l l s \ 2 2 3 3 5 0 0 0 \ 0 4 _ P r o d u c t i o n \ 0 1 _ C A D \ 0 2 _ S h e e t s \ 2 O V E R A L L S I T E M A P . d w g J a n 0 7 , 2 0 2 5 - 5 : 3 3 p m DESCRIPTION OF REVISIONSNO.DATE BY DESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED DRAWING NO. PROJ. NO. ® FI L E N A M E : PL O T D A T E : NAME: SIGNATURE: LIC. NO.: DATE:CITY OF ARDEN HILLS 2 SITE MAP, NOTES AND ESTIMATED QUANTITIES LPP IDR MOB LARRY POPPLER 41005 1/8/2025------------ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 2025 CIPP LINING 22335.000 SCALE IN FEET 0 100 200 400 >> LEGEND EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER CIPP LINING>>>> SN INFLOW FROM BETHEL UNIVERSITY LIFT STATION CIPP PIPELINE SEGMENT INFORMATION STREET UPSTREAM MANHOLE DOWNSTREAM MANHOLE PIPE TYPE 8" SANITARY SEWER (LIN FT) 10" SANITARY SEWER (LIN FT) 24" STORM SEWER (LIN FT) SERVICE CONNECTION IN PIPE DROP CONNECTION IN PIPE PASCAL AVE 8-147A 8-147 VCP 350 7 PASCAL AVE 8-147 8-148 VCP/CIP 62 0 COUNTY ROAD E 8-150 8-149 VCP/PVC 185 2 COUNTY ROAD E 8-149 8-148 VCP 220 1 COUNTY ROAD E 8-148 8-056 VCP 245 1 COUNTY ROAD E 8-056 8-055 VCP 375 5 COUNTY ROAD E 8-055 8-142 VCP 160 0 1 ARDEN PLACE 8-139 8-138 VCP 325 3 ARDEN PLACE 8-138 8-137 VCP 205 3 ARDEN PLACE 8-137 8-136 VCP 380 6 ARDEN PLACE 8-136 8-135 VCP 210 6 ARDEN PLACE 8-135 8-134 VCP 400 10 FOREST LANE 8-132 8-131 VCP 180 1 FOREST LANE 8-131 8-130 VCP 170 0 FOREST LANE 8-130 8-129 VCP 160 4 FOREST LANE 8-129 8-128 VCP 210 4 FOREST LANE 8-128 8-127 VCP 270 4 SKILES LANE 8-164 8-163 VCP 135 2 SKILES LANE 8-163 8-162 VCP 102 0 SKILES LANE 8-162 8-161 VCP 135 0 SKILES LANE 8-157 8-121 VCP 220 2 SKILES LANE 8-121 8-122 VCP 140 1 SKILES LANE 8-122 8-123 VCP/PVC 160 3 SKILES LANE 8-123 8-124 VCP 100 0 1 SKILES LANE 8-124 8-125 VCP 250 1 1 GLENARDEN ROAD 8-142 8-141 272 0 GLENARDEN ROAD 8-141 8-134 VCP 185 2 GLENARDEN ROAD 8-134 8-133 VCP 226 1 GLENARDEN ROAD 8-133 8-127 VCP 226 4 GLENARDEN ROAD 8-127 8-126 VCP 212 1 GLENARDEN ROAD 8-126 8-125 VCP/PVC 212 2 1 GLENARDEN ROAD 8-125 8-114A VCP 380 6 GLENARDEN ROAD 8-114A 8-114 VCP/PVC 212 3 1 GLENARDEN CT CMP 70 PIPE LINING NOTES: 1.VERIFY AND DOCUMENT LOCATIONS AND SIZES OF ALL EXISTING SERVICES AND LATERALS. REINSTATE EXISTING ACTIVE SERVICE CONNECTIONS UPON COMPLETION OF LINING INSTALLATION. 2.VERIFY LENGTH AND INSIDE DIAMETER OF EACH SEGMENT TO BE LINED PRIOR TO ORDERING LINER. 3.PRIOR TO LINING, CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAN AND TELEVISE EACH SEGMENT TO BE LINED AND NOTIFY ENGINEER IF ANY AREAS OF CONCERN ARE NOTED. PROVIDE COPIES OF TELEVISING TO ENGINEER AT LEAST 3 DAYS PRIOR TO LINING. 4. ALL DEBRIS REMOVED FROM EXISTING SEWER LINES SHALL BE DISPOSED OF AT AN ACCEPTABLE SITE, AS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 5.THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING SEWER MANHOLES AND SEWER MAINS INDICATED ON THE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE. 6.PAYMENT FOR PIPE LINING WILL BE MADE AFTER PIPE INSTALLATION. NO PAYMENT WILL BE MADE FOR MATERIALS ON HAND. 7.CIPP LINING MATERIAL SHALL PROTRUDE 2-INCHES INTO EACH MANHOLE STRUCTURE 1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFINE OPERATIONS TO THE LIMITS OF THE CONSTRUCTION AREA AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, RIGHT OF WAY, EASEMENTS, AND CITY PROPERTY. WORK BY OTHER CONTRACTORS OR CITY CREWS WILL BE OCCURRING ON OLD SNELLING AVE AND PASCAL AVE AS WELL AS THE FREEWAY PARK IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NEAR THE INTERSECTION OF ARDEN PLACE AND GLENARDEN RD. THE CONTRACTOR MUST COORDINATE WORK WITH OTHER CONTRACTORS AND AVOID INTERRUPTING OTHER WORK. 2.RECORD DRAWINGS WILL BE PROVIDED UPON REQUEST 3.PROTECT ALL EXISTING UTILITIES FROM DAMAGE. 4.RESTORE ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO EXISTING OR BETTER CONDITION. 5.CONTRACTOR TO LIMIT AREA DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION AND ACCESS. PAYMENT WILL NOT BE MADE FOR RESTORATION OF AREAS DAMAGED DUE TO LACK OF CARE. 6.CONTRACTOR TO ONLY TRIM OR REMOVE TREES NECESSARY FOR TEMPORARY CONVEYANCE, MH REHABILITATION, OR LINING. COORDINATE WITH LANDOWNER, PROJECT ENGINEER AND CITY PRIOR TO ANY TREE TRIMMING OR REMOVAL GENERAL NOTES: 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TEMPORARY CONVEYANCE OF WASTEWATER AROUND THE SECTIONS OF PIPE DESIGNATED FOR CLEANING, CIPP INSTALLATION AND LATERAL CONNECTION SEALING. 2.FINAL TEMPORARY CONVEYANCE PLAN MUST BE DESIGNED BY CONTRACTOR AND APPROVED BY ENGINEER PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK 3.CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN ACCESS TO ALL HOMEOWNERS AT ALL TIMES. 4.CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY TEMPORARY CONVEYANCE TO EXISTING CONDITIONS. 5.RESTORATION OF AREAS DISTURBED BY TEMPORARY CONVEYANCE SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO TEMPORARY CONVEYANCE. 6.METHODS OF TEMPORARY CONVEYANCE FOR HOMES, BUSINESSES, ETC DIRECTLY CONNECTED TO SANITARY MAIN SHALL BE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY. 7.CONTRACTOR ENCOURAGED TO COORDINATE WITH BETHEL UNIVERSITY AND COMPLETE WORK DURING LOW FLOW PERIODS. TEMPORARY CONVEYANCE NOTES: 1.ANY RETAINING WALL, FENCE, OR OTHER PRIVATE PROPERTY REMOVED OR DAMAGED SHALL BE RESTORED TO EXISTING OR BETTER CONDITION AND WILL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE WORK. 2.ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE PER MNMUTCD. ANY TRAFFIC CONTROL REQUIRED SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE WORK. COUNTY APPROVAL REQUIRED FOR ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL ON COUNTY ROADWAYS. 3.CONTRACTOR IS TO INSTALL APPROPRIATE EROSION CONTROL IN ALL AREAS WHERE EROSION MAY OCCUR. EROSION CONTROL SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE WORK. 4.REMOVE ALL SOILS AND SEDIMENTS DEPOSITED ONTO PUBLIC AND/OR PRIVATE PAVEMENT AREAS WITHIN 24 HOURS OF DEPOSITION. REMOVAL OF TRACKING MATERIALS SHALL BE COMPLETED AT THE END OF EACH WORK DAY WHEN TRACKING OCCURS. SWEEPING MAY BE ORDERED AT ANY TIME IF CONDITIONS WARRANT. SWEEPING SHALL BE MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION AND IN SUCH A MANNER TO PREVENT DUST BEING BLOWN TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. 5.ALL TURF AREAS SHALL BE RESTORED WITH SALVAGED TOPSOIL AND SEED, OR SOD, PER SPECIFICATIONS. (INCIDENTAL) REMOVAL AND RESTORATION NOTES: STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED QUANTITIES LINE NO.ITEM UNIT QUANTITY BASE BID 1 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 1 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 3 TEMPORARY CONVEYANCE LUMP SUM 1 4 CLEAN & TELEVISE SANITARY SEWER (PRE-REHABILITATION)LIN FT 7274 5 HEAVY SEWER CLEANING HOUR 25 6 TRIM PROTRUDING TAP HOUR 5 7 CIPP LINING - 8" SANITARY SEWER LIN FT 5586 8 CIPP LINING - 10" SANITARY SEWER LIN FT 1688 9 REINSTATE SANITARY SEWER SERVICE EACH 85 10 REINSTATE OUTSIDE DROP EACH 5 ALTERNATE BID 11 CLEAN & TELEVISE STORM SEWER (PRE-REHABILITATION)LIN FT 70 12 HEAVY SEWER CLEANING HOUR 1 13 CIPP LINING - 24" STORM SEWER LIN FT 70 14 REINSTATE STORM MANHOLE EACH 1 SITE MAP CIPP STORM SEWER LINING VCP Page 1 of 1 CONSENT ITEM – 8N MEMORANDUM DATE: January 13, 2025 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Jessica Jagoe, Interim City Administrator FROM: Julie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk SUBJECT: Resolution Appointing Jessica Daniels to the Economic Development Commission (EDC) Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: $ $ $ Council Should Consider Motions to approve, table, or deny the following: • Resolution 2025-005 Appointing Jessica Daniels to the Economic Development Commission (EDC). • Background/Discussion Jessica Daniels submitted an application to volunteer as a member of the EDC. Interviews were conducted that included the Council Liaison, Staff Liaison and EDC Member Jud Murchie. Following the interview, it is recommended that Jessica Daniels be appointed to the EDC for a term ending December 31, 2027. Attachment Attachment A: Resolution 2025-005 To view the final document, access adopted Resolutions via Arden Hills Public Laserfiche Weblink by visiting cityofardenhills.org and clicking on Archived Documents under Helpful Links on our main webpage. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2025-005 A RESOLUTION APPOINTING JESSICA DANIELS TO THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION (EDC) FOR A TERM EXPIRING DECEMBER 31, 2027 WHEREAS, the City Council appoints residents to serve in an advisory capacity to the various Commissions or Committees; and WHEREAS, the Economic Development Commission (EDC) currently has openings for membership on the committee. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Arden Hills City Council appoints Jessica Daniels to serve on the EDC with a term ending December 31, 2027. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS THIS 13th DAY OF JANUARY 2025. ______________________________ David Grant, Mayor ATTEST: ________________________________ Julie Hanson, City Clerk Attachment A Page 1 of 2 CONSENT ITEM – 8O MEMORANDUM DATE: January 13, 2025 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Dave Perrault, City Administrator FROM: David Swearingen, P.E. Public Works Director / City Engineer SUBJECT: 2025 Capital Equipment Replacement – Unit 318 2013 F-450 Plow Truck Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: $110,000 (net) (2025 CIP) $114,626.54 (net) (After estimated auction) Equipment Replacement Fund Council Should Consider Motions to approve, table, or deny the following: • 2025 purchase of a 2025 F550 Regular Cab 4x4 6.7L Diesel Truck equipped with a front plow, rear sander, and dump body in the amount of $144,626.54. Background/Discussion The 2025 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) includes replacement of Unit 318, 2013 F-450 Plow Truck. Attachment A is the CIP detail sheet which includes the latest vehicle mileage and repair costs. At the November 12, 2024 Work Session, Council discussed the 2025 Proposed Budget and CIP which included the Public Works Equipment Purchases. Public Works staff received quotes to replace Unit 318 and equip it for plowing. The cab and chassis price are $71,688.54, per the MN State Contract pricing (Attachment B). Staff was informed of an approximate lead time from Ford, which is 6-8 months for cab and chassis delivery. Staff recommends replacement of Unit 318, 2013 F-450 truck to ensure timely delivery prior to the 2025-2026 winter, also to get ahead of potential high-cost repairs, and to have a higher auction value. Preventative maintenance costs from 2022, current total is $885 and repair costs Page 2 of 2 from 2019, current total is $8,099. Typically, the frequency of repairs will increase with the age of the equipment. The replacement 2025 F550 Regular Cab 4x4 6.7L Diesel, is equipped with a front plow, dump body, rear sander, box tarp, and applicable controls/ hydraulics. This truck is assigned to a primary street route for snow and ice control operations, street sweeping, and misc. material handling, and hauling larger equipment. The GVRW increase to an F-550 chassis will increase the versatility of the truck, able to tow our largest trailer/equipment to job sites. The cost increase between an F-450 to a F-550 is $344.13. Budget Impact (Attachment B) 2025 F-550 Regular Cab 4x4 6.7 L Diesel: $71,688.54 (Attachment C) Towmaster dump body and read sander upfitting and hydraulics: $59,126 (Attachment D) Crysteel front plow (Boss plow): $13,812 Total Cost: $144,626.54 Purple Wave Auction Estimate for Unit 85441: $30,000 Net Cost: $114,626.54 The Capital Improvement Program for equipment purchases includes a budget of $135,000 with an estimated trade in value of $25,000 which equates to a net cost of $110,000 for replacement of Unit 318 in 2025. After receiving actual quotes and researching current auction prices, the purchase of the new 2025 F550 Regular Cab 4x4 6.7L Diesel Truck equipped with a front plow, rear sander, and dump body is $144,626.54 and the auction estimate is $30,000, which equates to a net cost of $114,626.54. This is $4,626.54 over budget. Attachments Attachment A: Unit 318 Replacement CIP detail sheet Attachment B: Midway Ford, Ford F-550 Plow Truck Equipment and Attachments Quote Attachment C: Towmaster Buildout and Accessories Quote Attachment D: Crysteel Front Plow Quote Attachment E: Unit 318 Cracked Frame and Corrosion Pictures Capital Improvement Plan City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Contact Public Works Director 2025 2029 thru Department Equipment Description Replace 2013 Ford F-450 Plow/ Dump Truck. This replacement would include plow, dump body and salt spreader with related controls. Mileage 35,975 Estimated auction return $25,000 Project #25-EqpV-001 Priority 3 Important Justification This truck is used year round and a primary piece of equipment. Due to normal wear and corrosion factors, it's recommended for replacement within the recommended 12 year window. PM costs 2022 -$380; 2023 - $50; 2024 - $355 Repair costs from 2019-2024 total - $7,744 Budget Impact/Other Reduced repair and maintenance costs. Useful Life 10-12 Project Name Replace 2013 Ford F-450 Plow/Dump Truck #318 Category Vehicles Type Equipment TCAAP No Total Project Cost:$135,000 Total2025 2026 2027 2028 2029Expenditures 135,000135,000Equip/Vehicles/Furnishings 135,000 135,000Total Total2025 2026 2027 2028 2029Funding Sources 110,000110,000Equipment/Building Replacement Fund 25,00025,000Trade-In Value 135,000 135,000Total Produced Using the Plan-It Capital Planning Software 9 Attachment A Midway Ford Commercial Travis Swanson Fleet and Government Sales 651-343-5212 2777 N. Snelling Ave. tswanson@rosevillemidwayford.com Roseville MN 55113 Fax # 651-604-2936 Standard Automatic Transmission 40/20/40 Vinyl Front Seat Front Tow Hooks Dual Front Air Bags 4-Wheel ABS Brakes Rubber Floor Covering AM/FM Radio Air Conditioning Black Bumper Tilt Wheel 225/70r19.5 All Season Tires 7.3L V8 Upfitter Switches Power Locks & Windows Cruise Options Code Price Select Exterior Colors Code Select 6.7L Diesel 99T $9,551 x Antimatter Blue Metallic HX 4.10 Limited Slip X4N $360 x Race Red PQ Traction Tires TGK $195 x Agate Black UM Cloth 40/20/40 Seat 1S $91 x Carbonized Gray Metallic M7 XL Chrome Package 96V $205 x Avalanche DR Snow Plow Prep 473 $228 x Oxford White Z1 x Block Heater 41H $173 x 410 Amp Alternators 67B $104 x Running Boards 18B $291 x Rear View Camera & Prep 872 $377 x Extended Service Contracts Cost Select Brake Controller 52B $273 x 7 year/75,000 mile $3,400 Seat Covers $450 x PremiumCare Warranty (Bumper to Bumper) Option Total $12,298 You must have a active FIN code to participate in this Base Price Totals purchase contract : FIN code # $54,459.00 Purchase Order required prior to order placement Options Price Totals $12,298.00 Extended Warranty PO # Transit Impr Excise Tax $20.00 Tax Exempt Lic $47.00 6.875% Sales Tax $4,589.54 Name of Organization Document fee $275.00 Sub total per vehicle $71,688.54 Number of Vehicles 1 Address Grand Total for all units $71,688.54 City, State, Zip Acceptance Signature Contact Person/ Phone # Print Name and Title Date Contact's e-mail address and fax # 2025 F-550 4x4 Regular Cab- 60" CA DRW XL F5H Attachment B TRKQT3MOD022324 Ship To: Cust: Phone:Bill To: Phone: ATTN: Reference No. Accepted by Date PO#Salesman Created Last Revised Appx CompTerms Serial No. Price: Total Discounts: Net Cost: Freight Total: ARDEN HILLS, CITY OF 1245 WEST HWY 96 ARDEN HILLS ARDEN HILLS, CITY OF 1245 WEST HWY 96 ARDEN HILLS THOMAS MIKACEVICH 651-755-0221 TIM ERICKSON QT 92559 NET 30 DAYS 12/17/24 12/17/24 3280 Order Comments: **STATE OF MN CONTRACT #257425** Build Instructions F.O.B LITCHFIELD, MN Qty Part No. Description Price Ea. Net Amt. 1 1997228 - Body 9'6" FSS w/15" high 12 ga SS Fold-Down Sides, 21" high $15,096.00 $15,096.00 10 ga SS Lever Top Pin release Tailgate, 40" high 10 ga SS Front, & 3/16" Hardox-450 floor. S-T-T light on Front Headboard. Cabshield, 12 VDC Tailgate trip release, & rear mudflaps included. Mill finish, with underside blasted, seam-sealed, primed and painted gloss black. 1 9901446 - Hoist TMTE 9' 515SF HOIST W/SUB FRAME, MOUNTING KIT, Dump $3,875.00 $3,875.00 angle: 45°, DOUBLE acting, W/rear hinge point & OSHA approved safety prop. LESS HYDRAULICS 1 9901455 - INSTALLATION OF DUMP BODY & HOIST FOR for CENTRAL HYD SYS, $3,977.00 $3,977.00 w/FMVSS 108 Lights & Rear Flaps 1 SPECIAL REQUEST - Special Request Charges for: $2,112.00 $2,112.00 SHURCO DURA-PULL tarp system, w/Black Vinyl material, pull rope, and restraininghooks. P/N 1991017 1 9901897 - TMTE-6 (2) L32LAF TOP MOUNT LED STROBES, 2 5VA02ZAD REAR $1,703.00 $1,703.00 STROBES W/GROMMETS INSTALLED 3 9900259 - Light acc'y LED LEVEL 3 work light with disconnect Installed $589.00 $1,767.00 **NOTE: (1) Mounted on LH end of FALLS SANDER for Spinner viewing, wired to OEM ACC'Y Switch. (2) Mounted on REAR BOTTOM OF RH & LH CORNER POSTS, for REVERSE use, wired to REVERSE SIGNAL. 1 9906343 - Vane Pump & Hot-Shift PTO, FORD Gas, 2020 & Newer $6,187.00 $6,187.00 1 9901086 - FORCE AMERICA AAF2010 Sys, w/VT15SS, & 5150EX-9F Control, $10,379.00 $10,379.00 Hyd Pkg - - to Run Hoist, Sander Auger, & Sander Spinner *--- Continued ---* MN 55112 USA MN 55112 0/00/00 ** QUOTATION ** $WWDFKPHQW& TRKQT3MOD022324 Ship To: Cust: Phone:Bill To: Phone: ATTN: Reference No. Accepted by Date PO#Salesman Created Last Revised Appx CompTerms Serial No. Price: Total Discounts: Net Cost: Freight Total: ARDEN HILLS, CITY OF 1245 WEST HWY 96 ARDEN HILLS ARDEN HILLS, CITY OF 1245 WEST HWY 96 ARDEN HILLS THOMAS MIKACEVICH 651-755-0221 TIM ERICKSON QT 92559 NET 30 DAYS 12/17/24 12/17/24 3280 1 9906284 - Installation of Electronic Controlled Hyd & control pkg $3,343.00 $3,343.00 with Hotshift Pto & Vane Pump configuration 1 9904691 - INSTALLATION of (Initial) Single camera system or $426.00 $426.00 relocation of OEM **NOTE: MOUNTED ON CENTER REAR HINGEPOINT AREA FOR REVERSE VIEWING USAGE, WIRED TO OEM HARNESS. 1 9901171 - Fenders M1900 W/Brkts for 19.5" Installed $692.00 $692.00 1 9900775 - Hitch TMTE Medium Duty STD Hitch Plate assembly $687.00 $687.00 1 9901172 - Hitch Installation of med duty hitch (Weld On) $283.00 $283.00 **NOTE: HITCH PLATE FACE TO BE LOCATED: END OF FRAME STANDARD. 1 9900776 - Hitch PH-20 Pintle Hook installed $230.00 $230.00 1 9902494 - Hitch 7 Contact RV (flat pin) socket installed $230.00 $230.00 **NOTE: OEM BRAKE CONTROLLER TO BE WIRED TO SOCKET 1 9901112 - ICC BUMPER $232.00 $232.00 1 9901113 - INSTALLATION OF ICC BUMPER $315.00 $315.00 1 9900782 - Sander Falls 1ASD-6CDSS-6P-1D-1S-SM Std 6" dia Auger, SS $5,334.00 $5,334.00 Unit, LH discharge, Single Poly Spinner Ass'y, Complete 1 9901718 - Sander Install & dual manifold RH & LH rear $1,361.00 $1,361.00 1 1917108 - Sander Towmaster Stainless Steel (optional) salt shield $57.00 $57.00 1 9900823 - Sander TMTE Exterior (removable) sander/tailgate spill $840.00 $840.00 plates, Stainless Steel *--- Continued ---* MN 55112 USA MN 55112 0/00/00 ** QUOTATION ** TRKQT3MOD022324 Ship To: Cust: Phone:Bill To: Phone: ATTN: Reference No. Accepted by Date PO#Salesman Created Last Revised Appx CompTerms Serial No. Price: Total Discounts: Net Cost: Freight Total: ARDEN HILLS, CITY OF 1245 WEST HWY 96 ARDEN HILLS ARDEN HILLS, CITY OF 1245 WEST HWY 96 ARDEN HILLS THOMAS MIKACEVICH 651-755-0221 TIM ERICKSON QT 92559 NET 30 DAYS 12/17/24 12/17/24 3280 $59,126.00 1 WARRANTY - TOWMASTER EXCLUSIVE WARRANTY: 5 yr Steel/Stainless Steel Body Structure; 5 yr Whelen LED Light Systems; 4 yr SwapLoader Hoists; 1 year Swenson Spreaders, 2 yr Hyd, FALLS Snow Equip, Tele/Scissor Hoists, and all other items. $59,126.00 $59,126.00 MN 55112 USA MN 55112 0/00/00 ** QUOTATION ** General Terms and Conditions for the Sale of Goods by Subsidiaries of ASH North America, Inc 1.1. These General Terms and Conditions for the Sale of Goods (these "Terms") govern the sale and delivery of all goods and products(the "Products"), and all transactions incidental thereto, by such subsidiary of ASH North America, Inc. identified on the respective Confirmed Order (as defined below) as the seller or supplier ("Seller") to any of its customers (each a "Customer"). The liability of each such subsidiary under these Terms or any Confirmed Order shall be several and not joint. Customer acknowledges and agrees that nothing in these Terms or any Confirmed Order shall be construed as implying joint liability in any case of ASH North America, Inc. or any of its subsidiaries. Each Seller shall be solely responsible for its own acts or omissions under the respective agreement with Customer. 1.2. No other terms or conditions shall be of any force or effect unless otherwise specifically agreed upon by Seller in a writing duly executed by an authorized officer of Seller. These Terms supersede any and all prior oral quotations, communications, agreements, or understandings of the parties in respect to the sale and delivery of the Products. The Seller may issue additional Terms and Conditions of Sale for certain products. These shall apply in addition to to the present Terms. Any additional or different terms or conditions contained in Customer's Order (as defined below), response to Seller´s confirmation, or any other form or document supplied by Customer are hereby expressly rejected and are rendered null, void, and of no effect. These Terms may not be modified, amended, waived, superseded, or rescinded, except by written agreement signed by an authorized officer of Seller.Delivery of the Products by Seller does not constitute acceptance of any of Customer´s terms and conditions and do not serve to modify or amend these Terms. 1.3. The issuance of an Order (as defined below) by Customer to Seller or any communication or conduct of Customer which confirms an agreement for the delivery of Products by Seller, as well as acceptance in whole or in part by Customer of any delivery of Products by Seller, shall be construed as Customer´s acceptance of theseTerms. Status 2024 1. SCOPE AND VALIDITY 2. OFFERS, ORDERS AND CONFIRMATION 2.1. Unless otherwise specified by Seller in writing, all offers made by Seller are not binding and may be revoked by Seller at any time without any liability to Customer. 2.2. Customer shall issue to Seller orders for the purchase of Products, in written form via the order process determined by Seller from time to time (each, an "Order"). By issuing an Order to Seller, Customermakes an offer to purchase the Products pursuant to these Terms and the terms set forth on such Order. Provided that the Order contains the same terms as in Seller´s corresponding offer, the Order shall be binding on Customer for six (6) weeks after Seller´s receipt of such Order. 2.3. Seller may refuse an Order for any or no reason. No Order is binding upon Seller until Seller´s acceptance of the Order in writing, the issuance of any governmental permit, license, or authority to Seller, as may be required under applicable laws, rules and regulations, and the receipt by Seller of a resale license to be provided by Customer (a "Confirmed Order"). 2.4. Specifications and other information on drawings, data sheets, pictures, plans, brochures, catalogs, or Seller´s website shall not be binding on Seller unless such specifications and information have been agreed to in writing by Seller in a Confirmed Order. Notwithstanding a Confirmed Order, Seller shall have no obligation to deliver Products to Customer or otherwise fulfill any of its obligations set forth in a Confirmed Order if Customer is in breach of any of its obligations hereunder or any Confirmed Order. 2.5. Customer may submit to Seller written requests to change the terms of a Confirmed Order (each such request, a "Change Order Request"). Seller may, at its sole discretion, consider such Change Order Request, provided that Seller will have no obligation to perform any Change Order Request unless and until Seller has agreed in writing to adopt such Change Order Request. If Seller elects to consider such a Change Order Request, then Seller shall promptly notify Customer of any adjustment to the applicable purchase price for the Products. 2.6. In the event Customer cancels any Confirmed Order for any reason, Customer shall reimburse to Seller all of Seller´s costs and expenses associated with or incurred due to such cancellation, including but not limited to the cost of raw materials, labor, and storage if cancellation occurs before Seller´s commencement of production. In the event Customer cancels any Confirmed Order for any reason and Seller has started the production of the Product on the respective Confirmed Order, Customer shall pay to Seller the full purchase price. 2.7. Each Confirmed Order shall be considered a separate agreement between the parties, and any failure to deliver the Products under any Confirmed Order shall have no consequences for other deliveries of Products. 3. PRICES 3.1. Unless otherwise agreed to by the parties in the applicable Confirmed Order, the prices of the Products shall be FCA (agreed delivery location on the applicable Confirmed Order), Incoterms 2022. 3.2. Unless otherwise agreed by the parties in a Confirmed Order, the price of the Products shall not include transportation, insurance, packaging, and Tooling (as defined below) and other materials used for the manufacturing and delivery, sales or Heavy Vehicle Use Tax (HVUT), other use tax or any other similar applicable federal, state or foreign taxes, duties, levies, or charges in any jurisdiction in connection with the sale or delivery of the Products ("Taxes"), Such Taxes shall be payable by Customer, and if Seller is responsible for the collection thereof, such Taxes shall either be added to the price invoiced or be separately invoiced by Seller to Customer. Any special requests concerning shipping, transportation, and insurance shall be communicated to Seller in a timely manner and subject to Seller´s prior written approval. Customer shall bear all costs resulting from such requests.In case of lead delivery times of more than two (2) months, Customer hereby acknowledges and agrees that Seller, may, at its sole discretion, increase or decrease the agreed prices on any Confirmed Order in the event of material price changes in wages, materials, energy or raw material after the date of the Confirmed Order. 4. PAYMENT TERMS 4.1. Except as set forth in Section 4.2 or unless otherwise agreed in writing by Seller, the purchase price for the Products and all other amounts due under a Confirmed Order shall be due and payable in US dollars within thirty (30) days following the date of Seller´s invoice for such Products without any discount, deduction or offset whatsoever. In no event shall any loss, damage, injury or destruction, Force Majeure (as defined below), or any other event beyond Customer´s control release Customer from its obligation to make the payments required herein. Payment of all amounts due hereunder shall be made by bank transfer or in any other manner set forth on Seller´s invoice. Customer shall be solely responsible for any bank fees, or other fees, incurred due to the wire transfer or any other selected payment method. If Seller agrees to payment by credit card, Seller shall charge an appropriate transaction fee, which the Customer shall also pay. 4.2. In the event Seller becomes aware of circumstances or has reason to believe that there are circumstances that may have an adverse effect on Customer´s financial condition, Seller may require the Customer to pay the total amount of the purchase price or fees, or a portion thereof prior to the delivery of the Products. Seller may, without any liability to Customer, refuse the delivery of any Product in the event the Customer fails to make the payment as required under this Section 4.2. 4.3. Time is of the essence for the payment of all amounts due to Seller under any Confirmed Order. If Customer fails to make payments of any amount when due, Customer shall pay interest to Seller at the rate of one percent (1%) per month or such lesser amount as may be permitted by applicable law starting from the due date until payment to Seller of such amount in full. In addition to the interest, Seller may, at its sole discretion, charge the Customer a flat fee of $40 for each reminder notice issued to Customer due to late payments. If Customer fails to comply with these Terms or a Confirmed Order, or if Customer becomes insolvent, all balances then due and owing to Seller shall become due immediately, notwithstanding any payment terms agreed by the parties. All costs and expenses incurred by Seller with respect to the collection of overdue payments (including, without limitation, reasonable attorney´s fees, expert fees, and other expenses of litigation) shall be borne by Customer. Every payment by Customer shall first be 5.1. If Seller extends credit to Customer for the purchase price for any Products (including but not limited to pursuant to Section 4.1.), or any other amounts due to Seller, Customer hereby grants to Seller as security for the timely payment and performance of all Customer´s payment obligations to Seller, a first priority security interest (the "Security Interest") in all Products heretofore or in the future delivered to Customer and in the proceeds thereof for as long as such Products shall not have been sold by Customer in the ordinary course of business (the "Collateral"). Seller shall be entitled to file any and all financing, continuation, or similar statements under the Uniform Commercial Code in any jurisdiction and take any and all other action necessary or desirable, in Seller´s sole and absolute discretion, to perfect its Security Interest in the Collateral and to establish, continue, preserve, and protect Seller´s Security Interest in the Collateral. Customer agrees to take any and all actions and provide Customer with all information necessary to enable Seller to perfect and enforce its Security Interest in all jurisdictions and vis-à-vis any of Customer´s creditors, and hereby irrevocably grants to Seller a power of attorney to execute all necessarystatements or documents in Customer´s name for the perfection and enforcement of such Security Interest. The Security Interest shall remain in force until payment in full of the entire purchase price for such Products, and any other amounts due to Seller by Customer. Seller may, without notice, change or withdraw extensions of credit at any time. applied to pay for Seller´s cost of collection, then interest owed by Customer, and then to the oldest outstanding claim. 4.4. Notwithstanding anything in the foregoing Section 4.3 or Section 5, if the parties agreed on installment payments in a Confirmed Order and Customer fails to make any installment payment when due, the remaining balance including accrued interest, and any expenses incurred by Seller shall be due and payable to Seller promptly upon Customer´s receipt of written notice of delinquency from Seller. 5. SECURITY INTEREST 2 6. OBLIGATIONS OF CUSTOMER 6.1. Customer shall use the Products solely for their intended purpose and pursuant to Seller´s instructions, and agrees to use only qualified personnel for the handling of the Products. Customer shall ensure that its customers, employees, agents, and other representatives comply with this Section 6.1. and shall be responsible for their acts and omissions. 7. DELIVERY AND ACCEPTANCE 7.1. Unless otherwise agreed in writing by Seller, all deliveries of Products shall be made FCA (agreed delivery location) (Incoterms 2020) and title to and risk of loss for the Products shall pass to Customer upon delivery pursuant to this Section 7.1. 7.2. Any delivery and performance times or dates communicated by or on behalf of Seller are estimates and shall not be binding on Seller. Seller may make partial delivery of Products to be delivered under any Confirmed Order and invoice Customer separately for such partial deliveries or performance. If Customer has not received the Products after six (6) weeks from the estimated delivery date, Customer may make a written request to Seller for delivery. Customer hereby acknowledges and agrees that the actual delivery date of the Products is conditioned upon the complete, accurate and timely delivery of materials from Seller´s vendors and suppliers. No delay in delivery of any Productsshall relieve Customer of its obligation to accept the delivery or performance thereof and make payments of any amounts due in accordance with these Terms, including but not limited to delays caused governmental restrictions on exports or imports and similar measures. 7.3. Customer´s failure to accept the delivery of Products pursuant to a Confirmed Order shall not release or excuse Customer from its obligation to timely pay all amounts due in connection with such Confirmed Order. The Products shall be deemed delivered at the time theyhave been made available to Customer. If Customer rejects or revokes acceptance of Products, or fails to pay any amounts when due, Seller, in its sole and absolute discretion, may extend the period of delivery of Products by such period as Seller may deem reasonable with such period not exceeding three (3) months from the agreed delivery date, or withhold or cancel delivery of any Products, or cancel any or all Confirmed Orders without any further obligations to Customer whatsoever. In such event, Customer shall be responsible for any and all costs and expenses incurred, or damages or losses suffered by Seller in connection with any such delay notwithstanding any action or inaction by Seller with regard to such delay. Any remaining Products that have not been accepted by Customer within the extended delivery period determined by Seller will be delivered and invoiced by Seller to Customer and Customer agrees to accept such delivery and pay for the purchase price and other amounts payable for the delivered Products. 8. EXAMINATION AND CONFORMITY TO ORDER 8.1. Promptly upon receipt of any Products, Customer shall conduct a full and complete inspection of such Products as to any defects and to confirm compliance with all requirements of the applicable Confirmed Order. Customer shall notify Seller in writing of any packaging defects, apparent defects, or non-compliance of such Products with the applicable Confirmed Order that Customer has or could reasonably have discovered during such inspection within seven (7) days from the date of receipt of such Products, and Customer shall notify Seller in writing within three (3) days of the date on which Customer shall first have become aware of any hidden defect or non-compliance which could not reasonably have been discovered during Customer´s initial inspection of the Products. Such notification shall include reasonable details (including images) on the alleged defects including lot, batch,or Order numbers. 8.2. If Customer fails to timely notify Seller of any defects or other non-compliance of any Products delivered or Customer (or its customers, employees, agents, or representatives) uses, destroys, or modifiesany Products that Customer knows or should have known to be defective or non-compliant without Seller´s prior written consent, Customer shall be deemed to have unconditionally accepted such Products and waived all of its claims for breach of warranty or otherwise in respect of such Products. 8.3. Customer may only return the Products to Seller with Seller´s prior written approval. If the return has been approved by Seller, Customer shall return the Products to Seller at Customer´s sole risk and expense to the destination directed by Seller. 8.4. Complaints of Customer in connection with the shipping or transport shall be directed to the carrier promptly upon receipt of the delivery or the freight documents. 9. LIMITED PRODUCT WARRANTY 9.1. Seller warrants to Customer that the Products will be free of defects in material and workmanship and conform with the requirements set forth in the applicable Confirmed Order for a period of twelve (12) months from the date of delivery for new business Products and ninety (90) days for after sales Products. (the "Limited Product Warranty"). 9.2. Unless expressly agreed to in writing by Seller, Seller makes no warranty that the Products comply with applicable law, regulations,or specifications in any jurisdiction in which the Products may be used, integrated or incorporated. Any governmental or other approvals necessary in connection with the use, integration or incorporation of the Products shall be Customer´s sole responsibility. 9.3. The Limited Product Warranty shall be void if the Defect (as defined below) resulted from (a) improper or inadequate use, storage,handling, operation, integration, incorporation, assembly, maintenance, or unauthorized alteration, modification, repair of the Products (including without limitation, the use storage, handling, operation, or integration of the Products contrary to written instructions and/or recommendations of Seller or inadequate training of personnel), (b)changes to construction and materials pursuant to Customer´s requests, (c) use of improper tools, resources, or accessories including those but not limited to any third party tools, resources, or accessories that are not approved by Seller or not in accordance with Seller´s recommendations, instructions, or directions, (d) acts or omissions of Customer or third parties following delivery of the Product, (e) Customer´s failure to properly communicate Seller´s instructions and warnings to users of the Products, (f) Customer´s, its employees, agents, representatives, customers or any third party´s non-compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulation, (g) Force Majeure, or (h) ordinary wear and tear of the Products (e.g., sweep bristles). 10.1. IN NO EVENT SHALL SELLER BE LIABLE TO CUSTOMER, ITS CUSTOMERS, EMPLOYEES, AGENTS, AND OTHER REPRESENTATIVES FOR ANY INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, PUNITIVE, SPECIAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, REVENUE, GOODWILL, OR USE, WHETHER IN AN ACTION IN CONTRACT, TORT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR IMPOSED BY STATUTE, OR OTHERWISE, EVEN IF SELLER WAS ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OF THE TERMS CONTAINED HEREIN, SELLER´S LIABILITY FOR ANY CLAIM èWHETHER BASED UPON CONTRACT, TORT, EQUITY, NEGLIGENCE, OR ANY OTHER LEGAL CONCEPT è SHALL IN NO EVENT EXCEED THE PURCHASE PRICE PAID BY THE CUSTOMER FOR THE PRODUCTS, GIVING RISE TO SUCH CLAIM. CUSTOMER HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES THAT THE PROVISIONS OF THESE TERMS FAIRLY ALLOCATE THE RISKS BETWEEN SELLER AND CUSTOMER, THAT SELLER´S PRICING REFLECTS THIS ALLOCATION OF RISK, AND BUT FOR THIS ALLOCATION AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITY, SELLER WOULD NOT HAVE ENTERED INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH CUSTOMER FOR THE SALE OF THE PRODUCTS. 10.2. Seller shall not be liable for, and Customer assumes responsibility and shall indemnify, defend, and hold Seller harmless for any and all claims, including without limitation claims for personal injury or property damages, resulting from (a) the improper or inadequate use, storage, handling, operation, assembly, integration, incorporation, assembly, maintenance, or unauthorized alteration, modification, or repair of the Products (including without limitation, the use storage, handling, operation, or integration of the Products contrary to written instructions and/or recommendations of Seller or inadequate training of personnel), (b) changes to construction and materials pursuant to Customer´s requests, (c) use of improper tools, resources, or accessories including those but not limited to any third party tools, resources, or accessories that are not approved by Seller or not in accordance with Seller´s recommendations, instructions, or directions, (d) acts or omissions of failure to properly communicate Seller´s instructions and warnings to users of the Products, or (f) Customer´s, its employees, agents, representatives, customers or any third party´s non-compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulation, (g) Force Majeure, or (h) ordinary wear and tear of the Products (e.g., sweep bristles). 10.3. In jurisdictions that limit or preclude limitations or exclusion of remedies, damages, or liability, such as liability for gross negligence or willful misconduct or do not allow implied warranties to be excluded, the limitation or exclusion of warranties, remedies, damages, or liability set forth in these Terms are intended to apply to the maximum extent permitted by applicable law, and these Terms shall be deemed amended to comply with such limitations or exclusions. Customer may also have other rights that vary by state, country or other jurisdiction. 1.1. "Confidential Information" means: (i) any know-how, trade secrets, and other business or technical information of Seller that is confidential or proprietary or due to its nature or under the circumstances of its disclosure the Customer knows or has reason to know should be treated as confidential or proprietary, including but not limited to quotations, drawings, project documentation, samples and models. 11.2. Confidential Information does not include information that: (i) is or becomes generally known to the public through no fault or breach of these Terms by the Customer; (ii) is rightfully known by the Customerat the time of disclosure without an obligation of confidentiality; (iii) is independently developed by the Customer without use of Seller´s Confidential Information; (iv) is rightfully received by the Customer from a third party without restriction on use or disclosure; or (v) is disclosed with Seller´s prior written approval. 11.3. Customer shall not use Seller's Confidential Information except as necessary to use the Products and will not disclose such Confidential Information to any third party except to those of its employees, agents, subcontractors, or representatives who have a bona fide need to know such Confidential Information to enable Customer to use the Products; provided that each such employee, agent, subcontractor,and/or representative is/are bound by a written agreement that contains use and nondisclosure restrictions not less stringent than the terms set forth in this Section 11.3. The Customer will employ all reasonable steps to protect Seller´s Confidential Information from unauthorized use or disclosure, including, but not limited to, all steps that it takes to protect its own information of like importance. The foregoing obligations will not restrict the Customer from disclosing Seller's Confidential Information: (i) pursuant to the order or requirement of a court, administrative agency, or other governmental body, provided that the Customer gives reasonable notice to Seller to contest such order or requirement; (ii) to its legal or financial advisors; and (iii) as required under applicable securities regulations. 11.4. In the event of a violation or threatened violation of Customer´s obligations under this Section 11, Seller shall be entitled to seek equitable relief, including in the form of a restraining order, orders for preliminary or permanent injunction, specific performance and any other relief that may be available from any court, without the requirement to secure or post any bond, or show actual monetary damages in connection with such relief. These remedies shall not be deemed to be exclusive but in addition to all other remedies available under these Terms, at law, or in equity. 9.4. In the event of an alleged breach of the Limited Product Warranty (a "Defect"), Customer shall, at Customer´s sole expense, send the Product to Seller. Seller shall conduct the necessary tests on such Product within a reasonable period. If Seller confirms the Defect, Sellershall, at its sole option and discretion, repair or replace the Defective Product. If the repair or replacement of the Defective Product is commercially unreasonable to Seller, Seller may, at its sole discretion, issue a refund to Customer in the amount Seller deems adequate. Such repair, replacement, or refund shall be the sole liability of Seller and the sole remedy of Customer with respect to a Defect. In no event shall any warranty claims for a Defect be made after twelve (12) months from the date of Customer´s receipt of the Products. Any Products or parts returned to Seller for removal or repair under this Section 9.4 shall be the property of Seller. Any applicable Limited Product Warranty period shall not start anew with the repair or replacement of the Defective Product (or any portion thereof). 9.5. Except for Limited Product Warranty, SELLER HEREBY EXPRESSLY EXCLUDES AND DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL OTHER WARRANTIES, WHETHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR NONINFRINGEMENT. Seller makes no other warranties with respect to the Products, and no person is authorized to make any warranties on behalf of Seller that are inconsistent with the warranties set forth under this Section 9. 10. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY 11. CONFIDENTIALITY 3 12. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY 12.1 Seller reserves the sole and exclusive ownership of the intellectual property rights in the Products (including but not limited to the technology used to manufacture the Products) and any improvements thereof regardless of inventorship or authorship. Customer shall not (and shall cause its employees, agents, representatives and customers to not) reverse engineer, decompile, disassemble, or decode any of Seller´s intellectual property embedded or used in any of the Product. 13. FORCE MAJEURE 13.1. Seller shall not be responsible for any failure or delay in its performance under these Terms due to causes beyond its reasonable control, including, but not limited to, disruptions of the public power supply, communications, and transportation infrastructure, governmental measures, malware or hacker attacks, fire, extraordinary weather events, epidemics, pandemics (or any government restrictions implemented as a result thereof), nuclear and chemical accidents, earthquakes, war, terrorist attacks, labor disputes, strikes, lockouts, shortages of or inability to obtain labor, energy, raw materials or supplies, or other acts of God. 14. MISCELLANEOUS 14.1. If any provision contained in these Terms or any Confirmed Order is held by final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable, such invalid, illegal, or unenforceable 16.1. These Terms and the Confirmed Orders shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Wisconsin without giving effect to any choice or conflict of law provision or rule that would defer to or cause the application of the substantive laws of any jurisdiction other than Wisconsin. The parties hereby expressly exclude the application of the 1980 United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods. 16.2. Any dispute, controversy, or claim arising out of or relating to these Terms and any Confirmed Order, including but not limited to the execution, performance, or termination thereof or to any issue of liability arising out of the performance of these Terms or any Confirmed Order, which the parties have not been able to settle amicably shall be submitted to the exclusive jurisdiction of the state or federal courts with jurisdiction in the County of Calumet, Wisconsin, provided that notwithstanding the foregoing, Seller shall be entitled to seek specific performance and injunctive relief in any court of competent jurisdiction. Each party hereby waives any and all claims, pleas, or defenses (including without limitation a plea for forum non conveniens) that would permit such party to seek the jurisdiction of any courts or arbitration tribunals other than those set forth in the preceding sentence. 16.3. EACH PARTY HEREBY WAIVES, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, ANY RIGHT IT MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY LEGAL PROCEEDING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THESE TERMS. 16. APPLICABLE LAW AND JURISDICTION 4 Order, the provisions of the Confirmed Order will govern and control. Seller may amend or modify these Terms from time to time. Seller may, at its sole discretion, provide Customer with written notice of any such changes, revisions, amendments, or modifications, provided, however that any such changes, revisions, amendments, or modifications shall become effective without any further action by any party and that they shall not apply to any Confirmed Order prior to the effective date of such changes, revisions, amendments, or modifications. provision shall be severed from the remainder of these Terms or such Confirmed Order, and the remainder of these Terms or such Confirmed Order shall be enforced. In addition, the invalid, illegal, or unenforceable provision shall be deemed to be automatically modified, and, as so modified, to be included in these Terms, such modification being made to the minimum extent necessary to render such provision valid, legal,and enforceable. 14.2. Seller may assign its rights and/or delegate its liabilities under any Confirmed Order at any time. Customer may not assign its rights or delegate its responsibilities under a Confirmed Order without Seller´s prior written consent. 14.3. Seller´s waiver of any breach or violation of these Terms or the provisions of any Confirmed Order by Customer shall not be construed as a waiver of any other present or future breach or breaches by Customer. 14.4. The parties hereto are independent contractors and nothing in these Terms will be construed as creating a joint venture, partnership, employment, or agency relationship between the parties. 14.5. Notices by a party regarding the exercise of rights and obligations under these Terms must be signed by authorized representatives of such party, and delivered via courier, mail, or e-mail to the other party´s address indicated in the applicable Confirmed Order, providedthat a notice by e-mail shall only be validly given if receipt thereof is acknowledged in writing by the recipient. 15. ENTIRE AGREEMENT; CONFLICTS. 15.1. These Terms, including the applicable Confirmed Order, constitute the entire and exclusive agreement of the parties regarding thesubject matter hereof and supersede any and all prior or contemporaneous agreements, communications, and understandings (both written and oral) regarding such subject matter. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of these Terms and the provisions of a Confirmed 1130 73rd Avenue NE Fridley, MN 55432 (763) 571-1902 1-800-795-1902 Fax # (763) 571-5091 www.crysteeltruck.com Date:12/19/2024 Reference: Company:City of Arden Hills Address: Contact:Thomas Mikacevich Phone# 651-755-0221 City: Tmikacevich@cityofardenhills.org State: Chassis Estimated Delivery Ford CA or CT 2024-2025 Transmission F450 Cab Color QTY Price Each Extended 1 3.43 $9,087.00 $9,087.00 1 3.43 $875.00 $875.00 1 3.95 $350.00 $350.00 1 3.95 $135.00 $135.00 1 3.72 $179.00 $179.00 1 NCI $3,186.00 $3,186.00 Total Package Price $13,812.00 $4.00 Starting Point:Fridley, MN 1/2"Edge kit Carbide- Pair Installed AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER Highway 60 East Lake Crystal, MN 56055 (507) 726-6041 1-800-722-0588 Fax # (507) 726-2984 Arden Hills Email: MN 9'2" V-DXT w/carbide Dealer Truck Make Model Year EXTENSION OPTION: 1-UNIT STATE COOPERATIVE PRICING Truck Model REFERENCE: COOPERATIVE PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT FROM STATE OF MINNESOTA CONTRACT NO: 216663 RELEASE NO: T-763(5) CONTRACT PERIOD: Expires January 31,2025 Snow Deflector (7'6"-9'2" V-Plows, 7'6"-9' Super Duty, 9'HD) Install of Snow Deflector (7'6"-9'2" V-Plows, 7'6"-9' Super Duty, 9'HD) Light Adapter *IF NEEDED* 3.0 Front Snow Plow 9'2" V-DXT Steel Vee Plow Install of 9'2" V-DXT Steel Vee Plow ***PRICES SHOWN DO NOT INCLUDE ANY APPLICABLE TAXES OR FEES*** *A WRITTEN PURCHASE ORDER MUST BE RETURNED SPECIFYING PURCHASE OF THIS EQUIPMENT OFF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA COOPERATIVE PURCHASE CONTRACT **NO EXHAUST WORK INCLUDED FOR TRUCKS WITH NEW EMISSION CONTROL EXHAUST SYSTEMS. EXHAUST SYSTEMS CANNOT BE MODIFIED. ***ALL LABOR COSTS ARE BASED ON INSTALLING EQUIPMENT ON A TRUCK CHASSIS WITH ALL TRUCK ITEMS OUT OF THE WAY FOR EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION. IF CRYSTEEL HAS TO MOVE FUEL TANKS, AIR TANKS, AIR DRYER, ETC. EXTRA CHARGES MAY APPLY Vendor Name:Crysteel Truck Equipment-Fridley Cost Per Loaded Mile for Delivery: Email Address:muecker@crysteeltruck.com Phone #:(763) 957-0771 Toll Free #:(800) 795-1280 Fax #:(763) 571-5091 Contact Person:Mike Uecker Street Address:1130 73rd Ave NE City, State, Zip:Fridley, MN 55432 $WWDFKPHQW' Unit 318- 2013 Ford F-450 Plow/ Dump Body Corrosion Attachment E Page 1 of 20 PUBLIC HEARING – 10A MEMORANDUM DATE: January 13, 2025 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Jessica Jagoe, Interim City Administrator FROM: T.J. Hofer, Consultant Planner SUBJECT: Planning Case #24-018 – Public Hearing Required Applicant: Trident Development, LLC, Roger Fink Property Location: 1700 Highway 96 West, Request: Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan Review, Final Plat, and Easement Vacation Council Should Consider the Following: Hold the required public hearing for Planning Case 24-018, an application from Roger Fink, of Trident Development, LLC. (“The Applicant”) for a Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan Review, Final Plat, and Easement Vacation to subdivide and develop an approximately 41.10-acre property that currently contains a place of worship at 1700 Highway 96 West (“Subject Property”). This approval would allow for the construction of a 119-unit age restricted multiple family dwelling. The City Council will be asked to make a formal decision regarding the application under Agenda Item 11A. Background 1. Overview of Request The Applicant has submitted a land use application for a Master Planned Unit Development (PUD), Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan Review, Final Plat, and Easement Vacation to subdivide and develop an approximately 41.10 acre property that currently contains a place of worship at 1700 Highway 96 West. North Heights Lutheran Church currently owns the Subject Property and contains a single structure that acts as a House of Worship. The property currently has split zoning with a majority of the site zoned R-1 Single Family Residential District and the northwest of the parcel zoned B-1 Limited Business District. The Subject Property is also within the Shoreland Overlay District based on its proximity to Round Lake. The proposed changes to the site would subdivide the property into two conforming lots, to facilitate construction of a 162,819 square foot, 119-unit multiple family dwelling, and construct Page 2 of 20 additional parking for the existing house of worship. The proposed PUD for the land use and proposed flexibility would be exclusive to the proposed Lot 1, Block 1. The Applicant made an application for Preliminary Plat and Rezoning on July 17, 2024. The Preliminary Plat and Rezoning (PC 24-015) was reviewed by the Planning Commission on August 7, 2024, and the City Council on September 9, 2024. A public hearing was held at both meetings for this application. The City Council approved the Preliminary Plat at the September meeting but tabled the Rezoning on based on the need to review the land use application concurrently with the rezoning request. The Preliminary Plat was approved with the following conditions: 1. The Applicant shall submit to the City a land use application for Final Plat within three (3) months after the date of approval of the Preliminary Plat 2. The Applicant shall work with the Rice Creek Watershed District to review future modifications to vacate existing drainage and utility easements as well as proposed newly dedicated drainage and utility easements prior to the submittal of the Final Plat application. Modifications and newly dedicated easements shall be to the satisfaction of RCWD and the City. The three-month deadline for the submittal for the final plat based on the above condition was December 9, 2024. Based on this date, the City extended the review of the rezoning in PC 24-015 to November 12, 2024. Discussion of the Rezoning will happen simultaneously with the current request as part of New Business on the agenda. The Applicant initially made an application for Master Planned Unit Development (PUD), Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit (CUP), and Site Plan Review in October of 2024, but the application was deemed incomplete. The Applicant applied again on November 4, 2024, with the addition of an application for Final Plat and Easement Vacation, and the application was deemed complete. Due to the meeting schedule of the City, the Applicant has also submitted a waiver for their rights to a timely review as required by Minnesota State Statute §15.99, for the Final Plat and Rezoning applications, until January 13, 2025. The Subject Property has access from County Highway 96 to the north and Snelling Avenue North to the east. Properties around the parcel are zoned R-1 Single Family Residential District and POS Parks and Open Space District and are used for residential uses and houses of worship. 2. History of the Subject Property The Subject Property was developed in 1991 as a house of worship and an addition was approved in 1997. The existing structure used as a house of worship is approximately 91,609 square feet. No current planning approvals exist on the record for the property and the site is conforming based on the zoning ordinance. On September 11, 2024, the City Council approved a Preliminary Plat for the property and tabled a request for a rezoning as part of PC 24-015. The proposed rezoning would zone Lot 1, Block 1, as R-4 Multiple Dwelling District. Approval of PC 24-018 is contingent on the approval of the rezoning. Page 3 of 20 Approvals 1. Planned Unit Development The Applicant is requesting flexibility through a Planned Unit Development (PUD) to allow for the proposed development to exceed the maximum density, floor area ratio (FAR), and building height allowed in the High Density Residential (HDR) future land use and R-4 zoning district. This proposal involves both the initial Master Plan PUD and the Final PUD. The narrative describes density and lot size, however, does not do so using net acreage as is required in the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The Applicant has provided details in the Architectural Plans (Attachment G) which shows elevations for the proposed building. The narrative submitted by the Applicant further describes the requests through the PUD. The Applicant has stated they are requesting flexibility from building height to as it “will result in a higher quality development allowing for 9- foot-high ceilings in all dwelling units and a 6:12 roof pitch.” The Applicant has stated exceeding the FAR would lead to a reduction of amenity spaces for the residents.” Site Plan Site Rendering Page 4 of 20 2. Conditional Use Permit A “Dwelling: multiple family” (multiple family dwelling) is a conditional use in the R-4 Multiple Dwelling District. Typical factors to consider in the evaluation of the CUP request may be hours of operation, potential noise from the proposed use, lights from vehicles, and on-site traffic. City Code Section 1355.04 Subd. 3 of the Arden Hills Zoning Code lists the criteria for evaluating a CUP. The Planning Commission and City Council should consider the effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, convenience and general welfare of the owners and occupants of the surrounding land and the community, in general, including but not limited to the following factors: 1. Existing and anticipated traffic and parking conditions; 2. Noise, glare, odors, vibration, smoke, dust, air pollution, heat, liquid or solid waste, and other nuisance characteristics; 3. Drainage; 4. Population density; 5. Visual and land use compatibility with uses and structures on surrounding land; 6. Adjoining land values; 7. Park dedications where applicable; 8. Orderly development of the neighborhood and the City within the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Development Plan for the City. City Code Section 1325.045 Multi-family Dwelling Units Additional Conditional Use Permit Criteria establishes eight additional criteria to consider for a multi-family dwelling unit CUP. A full evaluation of these criteria will be reviewed later in the staff report. 3. Site Plan Review A site plan review is required for new development or additions in any business, industrial or multiple family zoning districts, for PUDs, and CUPs. 4. Final Plat A Final Plat is required to subdivide property. On September 9, 2024, the City Council approved a Preliminary Plat for the property. 5. Easement Vacation Drainage and utility easements exist on the Subject Property that the Applicant is proposing to vacate the delineation of existing easement boundaries and dedicate new easements as part of the final plat. The vacation and new dedication of easements has been discussed with the City Engineer/Public Works Director and has no additional comments. Rice Creek Watershed District has also reviewed and has no additional comments with the easements as presented. Page 5 of 20 Plan Evaluation Chapter 11, Subdivisions 1. Final Plat The Applicant is proposing to plat the Subject Property to adjust the lot lines between the two parcels as shown in the image below. The redevelopment of the site will consist of two buildings that function under shared parking, access, maintenance, and other items. A Final Plat is the final map, drawing or chart indicating the final layout for City approval. The Final Plat (Attachment E) includes the detailed survey description for each lot in the plat plus notes and dedication, recording and approval statements. The Final Plat is the “recorded document” submitted to the county register and must conform to all state laws. Proposed Final Plat Final plats must be substantially consistent with Preliminary Plats. The submitted Final Plat is substantially consistent with the Preliminary Plat approved by the Council on September 9, 2024. 2. Public Use Dedication Land was previously dedicated as part of the approval for a Planned Unit Development in 1984 as part of PC 84-21, which created the original PUD for the house of worship. A condition of approval was the dedication of 4.57 acres of parkland to the City. This area is now Royal Hills Park. The previous dedication of this land does not automatically meet the dedication requirements for the current application. Lot 2, Block Lot 1, Block Page 6 of 20 In evaluating the land dedication and park development requirements for a specific application, the City may consider whether in conjunction with a previous subdivision an adequate area of land was conveyed or dedicated to the City to meet the minimum needs for parks, trails, wetlands, and open spaces resulting from the subject development proposal. In reviewing the dedications required by the City Code, the Council should consider the impact of the proposed subdivision and multifamily dwelling land use and if the previous dedication meets none, some, or all of the dedication that would be required. A. Residential Dedication The City requires all owners or developers, as a prerequisite to approval of a subdivision to convey to the City or dedicate to the public use a reasonable portion of any such proposal for public use as streets, roads, sewers, electric, gas, and water facilities, storm water drainage and holding areas or ponds and similar utilities and improvements, parks, recreational facilities, playgrounds, trails, wetlands, or open space, in such portions to be approved and acceptable to the City. For a subdivision that results in new dwelling units in excess of eight units per acre, Section 1130.08 of the Subdivision Ordinance permits the City to require the Applicants to dedicate up to 20% of the acres of development or a cash contribution in lieu of land dedication may be required at the discretion of the City at the time the final plat is approved. The cash payment shall be determined based on the fair market of the land that would otherwise be dedicated to the City. In 2024, Ramsey County assigned an estimated market value of $22 million to the Subject Property prior to the subdivision. This value is inclusive of both the land and existing structure on the property. State Statutes require the City to use the value of the property prior to development when determining park dedication requirements. The Applicant has stated that the purchase price for the property does not reflect the $22 million estimated value from Ramsey County. The residential dedication is based on the acres of development, and as such the dedication can be evaluated not as the total 41.10-acre property, but the 10.74 acres being acquired and developed by the Applicant, or 26.1% of the property. Based on the assessed value, and the percentage being developed, an approximate value for the 10.74 acres is $5,742,000 and 20% of this value is $1,148,400. The Applicant is not proposing land dedication as part of the final plat beyond the standard right- of-way and easements requirements. The City Council should discuss the City’s discretion for payment in lieu of land dedication for the 10.74 acres as Lot 1, Block 1. B. Park Development The City’s Subdivision Code establishes requirements for Public Use Dedications and Park, trails, and open space land dedication and development. Owners or developers, as a prerequisite to approval of a subdivision to convey to the City or dedicate to the public use a reasonable portion of any such proposal for public use as streets, roads, sewers, electric, gas, and water facilities, storm water drainage and holding areas or ponds and similar utilities and improvements, parks, recreational facilities, playgrounds, trails, wetlands, or open space, in such portions to be approved and acceptable to the City. The Applicant proposed to meet park dedication requirements by a payment of cash-in-lieu of land. In residential subdivisions where a park development fee is required, the City shall apply the fee on a per unit basis. The park development fee is established by ordinance on a regular Page 7 of 20 basis. The per unit fee is currently $6,500.00. The Applicant is proposing the development of a 119-unit building for a park dedication fee of $773,500.00. Chapter 13, Zoning Regulations Review 1. District Provisions (R-4 Multiple Dwelling District) – Section 1320 Trident Development – Lot 1, Block 1 Proposed 10.74 acres Under the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, this site is guided as High Density Residential (HDR) on the land use plan and the applicant has previously requested a rezoning to R-4. Direction 2040 Comp. Plan Land Use Zoning Existing Land Uses North TRC RMU – Retail Mixed Use TRC NR-3 – Residential TRC NR-4 – Residential POS – Parks and Open Space CD – Conservation TRC RMU – Retail Mixed Use TRC NR-3 – Residential TRC NR-4 – Residential POS – Parks and Open Space CD – Conservation R-1 – Single Family Residential House of Worship Vacant South POS - Park & Open Space POS – Parks and Open Space Park East PI – Public and Institutional LDR - Low Density Residential R-1 – Single Family Residential Single Family Dwellings West LDR - Low Density Residential R-1 – Single Family Residential Single Family Dwellings The Future Land Use designation is for townhome and multi-family residential land uses providing for densities of nine to twelve units per acre. The proposed site plan is attached as Attachment D. Multiple family dwellings require a CUP in the R-4 district. The table below provides the performance standards for the R-4 District and the preliminary analysis for the proposed development of the principal structure and the site: Ordinance Requirements R-4 District Standards Proposed Lot 1 Maximum Floor Area Ratio 0.3 0.347 Maximum Structure Coverage 25% 12% Maximum Impervious Surface 35% 26% Minimum Landscape Lot Area 65% 74% Minimum Front Yard Setback 40 feet 96.9 feet Minimum Rear Yard Setback 30 feet 86.5 feet Minimum Side Yard Setback 10 feet (min)/ 15 feet (total) 65.6 feet/ ~ 474 feet Minimum Lot Area (per dwelling unit) 3,630 sq. ft. 468,025 sq. ft. 3,933 sq. ft. Maximum Building Height 35 feet ~ 38 feet PUD & SUP Maximum Dwelling Unit Density Per Net Acre 12 units 13.9 units Page 8 of 20 A. Density, Maximum Dwelling Units – Flexibility Requested The High Density Residential (HDR) future land use is established in the Comprehensive Plan to be, “providing for densities of nine to 12 units per acre.” The Applicant has submitted a narrative that addresses lot size, but not density. When determining density for a proposed development net acreage for the site must be used. Net residential acreage is calculated by subtracting wetlands, water bodies, public parks, arterial streets, and identified natural resources that are protected by ordinance from gross acres. The Subject Property does not contain water bodies, public parks, arterial streets, or identified natural resources that are protected by ordinance from gross acres, but does include multiple wetlands. Proposed Lot 1, Block 1 contains three wetlands as shown on the submitted Wetland Delineation and Civil Plans. The Wetland Delineation notes the size of these wetlands. Wetland Number Acres (on site) Wetland 8 1.40 Wetland 9 0.40 Wetland 10 0.40 Density Calculation Total Site Acreage 10.75 Total Wetland Acreage 2.2 Net Acres 8.55 Proposed Units 119 Density (Units/Net Acres) 13.9 Approximately 9.9 net acres would be required for a 119-unit development. As proposed, developing the site with 119 units required flexibility from the density maximum established in the Comprehensive Plan. On July 11, 2022, the City Council approved Comprehensive Plan Amendments to Chapter 6 which included amending Section 6.4.10, Development Capacity and Net Residential Density to allow an increase in the maximum housing unit density as part of a Planned Unit Development. The Subject Property is part of the boundaries as described in Section 6.4.10 which states “Land guided for High Density east of Interstate 35W, south of County State Aid Highway 96, west of Snelling Avenue North and north of interstate 694 density may be increased by up to 100% through the use of the Planned Unit Development (PUD) process if the intent is to meet the goals of the Comprehensive Plan.” Furthermore, Chapter 6 also outlines how the City Code includes PUD regulations that allow for a higher quality and compatible development of property by encouraging reasonable flexibility from applicable standards, including at higher densities than would be allowed under the underlying zoning district and/or guided land use designation. Page 9 of 20 B. Maximum Floor Area Ratio – Flexibility Requested A floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.3 is permitted within the R-4 zoning district. The Applicant is requesting flexibility through a PUD to construct a building that would create a FAR of 0.35 for proposed Lot 1. C. Maximum Building Height – Flexibility Requested Section 1305.04 of the City Code defines building height as “the vertical distance from the average elevation of the grade along a face of a building to the highest point of the roof surface of flat roofs, the deck line of mansard roofs, or the average height between the eaves and the highest ridge of gable, hip, or gambrel roofs.” These measurements are illustrated in the drawing below. The proposed building has a gable roof, with a height of 38 feet as measured according to city code. A maximum building height of 35 feet is permitted within the R-4 zoning district. The Applicant is requesting flexibility through a PUD to construct a building that would be approximately 38 feet high on proposed Lot 1. 2. District Provisions (R-1 Single Family Residential District) – Section 1320 North Heights Lutheran Church – Lot 2, Block 1 Proposed 30.36 acres The North Heights Lutheran Church site, which would be described as Lot 2, Block 1, of the plat, will be altered as part of the subdivision. The subdivided lot must still meet the standards established in the City Code. The table below provides the performance standards for the R-1 District and the preliminary analysis for the proposed development of the site: Ordinance Requirements R-1 District Standards Proposed Lot 2 Maximum Floor Area Ratio 0.3 0.06 Maximum Structure Coverage 25% 7% Maximum Impervious Surface 35% 35% Minimum Landscape Lot Area 65% 65% Minimum Front Yard Setback 40 feet No Change Minimum Rear Yard Setback 30 feet No Change Minimum Side Yard Setback 10 feet (min)/ 25 feet (total) 113.1 feet Minimum Lot Area (per dwelling unit) 14,000 sq. ft. 1,322,416 sq. ft. Maximum Building Height 35 feet No Change Page 10 of 20 3. Design Standards – Section 1325.05 and 1325.055 A. Building Positioning – Meets Requirement The City Code requires setbacks for structures on lots. The proposed building for Lot 1 meets the established standards. The existing building for Lot 2 is conforming and will remain conforming with the proposed subdivision. B. Exterior Materials – Meets Requirement Buildings within the R-4 zoning district do not have requirements regarding exterior materials like business districts do. Section 1325.05 Subd. 6 Aesthetics requires proposed design, scale, massing, materials, height, and other aspects of the subject matter of any permit requested be evaluated by the Planning Commission and the Council with respect to structures and properties in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission and the Council shall consider, prior to the issuance of any permit, whether the appearance of the subject matter is so at variance with the structures and properties in the surrounding area as to cause a substantial depreciation in the property values in the surrounding area or to unreasonable detract from the appearance of the area or the city as a whole. The Applicant is proposing a mix of metal lap siding, vertical metal siding, brick veneer, vinyl patio doors and windows, metal accent features, and asphalt shingles. Renderings C. Lighting – Meets Requirement The Zoning Code requires that direction of lighting to be arranged away from adjoining lots and public streets, that lighting sources be concealed or hooded, and intensity of lighting any light or combination of lights shall not cast light that exceeds a meter reading of one foot candle on the travel lanes of adjoining public streets or 0.4 foot candles on adjoining residential property. For non-residential uses visible from residentially zoned property, the Code limits lighting to a Page 11 of 20 maximum of 25% percent of the facade visible from such residential property to be illuminated by direct lighting from spotlights or flood lights. Exterior Lighting Examples The proposed lighting plan includes wall mounted building lighting, flush-mounted lights, and light poles that are downward cast with 90-degree cut offs. The Applicant is also proposing pole lights placed throughout the parking lot. The Applicant has submitted a photometric plan that shows the submitted lighting package consistent with the City Code. D. Landscaping – For Review Section 1320.06 – District Requirements Chart of the City Code requires all uses maintain a landscaped area of 65%, or 304,216 square feet for the Subject Property, in the R-4 District. Landscaping can consist of naturally vegetated areas, wetlands, ponding areas, planting beds, ground cover and mulch areas (vegetative, rock, bark chip, etc.), decorative walkways and areas not to exceed fifteen percent (15%) of the required landscape lot area, outdoor recreation areas, and plantings such as trees, grass, shrubs. The Applicant is proposing a landscape lot area of approximately 74% percent or 345,450 square feet. The Applicant is proposing approximately 57,460 square feet of plantings, with the rest of the area to be left natural or part of wetlands and ponding areas. At least 10% or 5,746 square feet of the total landscaped area shall be covered with perennials and/or shrubbery. The Applicant is proposing perennial and/or shrubbery of approximately 23.63% or 13,331 square feet. Planting islands shall occupy 10%, 28,809 square feet for the Subject Property, of the parking area. The landscaping plans show 14 proposed parking islands for a total of 43,617 square feet of islands. Additionally, per City Code, planting islands shall be edged with concrete curbs. Parking lot planting islands shall be a minimum of 150 square feet in area, be of appropriate width and length, and include at least one tree to meet the requirements of this ordinance. The submitted plans reflect these requirements. Page 12 of 20 The site contains approximately 21,982 caliper inches of significant trees. Section 1325.055 Subd. 5 allows for the removal of fewer than ten (10) percent of the caliper inches of significant trees on the property without requiring mitigation, 2,198 for the Subject Property. The Applicant proposes removing 3,702 caliper inches of trees, meaning the Applicant is responsible for mitigation of 1,504 caliper inches removed above 10 percent. Per Section 1325.055 Subd 6, the number of caliper inches of trees required for replanting is determined at a rate of 1:2 or one inch replaced for every two inches lost. The Applicant intends to replace the 752 caliper inches required based on the total inches removed and the rate of replacement. Tree Mitigation Calculation Caliper Inches of Trees A Existing Significant Trees 21,982 B 10% of Existing Significant Trees 2,198 C Proposed Significant Tree Removal 3,702 D Caliper Inches in excess of 10% (C-B) 1,504 E Required Replacement Trees (D x 0.5) 752 F Proposed Replacement 752 The minimum tree size at time of planting shall be 2.5 caliper inches for deciduous trees and the percentage of trees planted of various caliper inches shall meet the requirements of the table provided. The landscaping plan currently states trees of two caliper inches will be planted on the site. The submitted plans show plantings within drainage and utility easements. These plantings must be moved outside of the easements. The City Code requires a minimum of one tree be provided along the right-of-way for every 50 feet of public street frontage. The Subject Property survey shows the property abutting County Highway 96, Snelling Avenue North, and State Highway 10. Both the frontages along County Highway 96 and Snelling Avenue North are heavily vegetated. Additional frontage along State Highway 10 is currently less vegetated and will be impacted by construction. The Applicant is proposing 38 trees along 398 feet of abutting right-of-way that will be disturbed along State Highway 10. E. Screening – Meets Requirements Under Section 1325.05, Subd. 4, requires when any non-residential use in residential districts by Conditional Use Permit or PUD, such as houses of worship and residential facilities over six adjoins or is located across the street from any single- or two-family residential lot, screening is required. All parking, loading service, utility, and outdoor storage areas shall be screened and buffered from all public streets and adjacent differing land use. Screening exists for the house of worship use on proposed Lot 2 and will not be altered. Existing vegetation and proposed landscaping are proposed for screening from adjacent residential uses for the proposed multiple family dwelling. Trash enclosures will be contained within the underground parking lot, under the proposed building. Page 13 of 20 F. Snow Storage – For Review Snow storage has not been indicated on the submitted plans. Snow storage areas shall be provided so that the number of parking spaces is not reduced below the minimum required. The City may initiate proceedings to require that snow be hauled off the site if parking and circulation problems related to inadequate snow-removal occur. G. Parking Setbacks – Meets Requirements The City Code requires off-street parking spaces to be located a minimum of 20 feet from the right-of-way of any public street. The Applicant has satisfied this requirement and has an approximately 119-foot setback from the ROW along County Highway 96. Proposed parking on the eastern part of the Subject Property is approximately 384 feet from Snelling Avenue North where existing parking is approximately 165 feet from the ROW. For side and rear setbacks, off- street parking spaces are required to be located a minimum of five feet from rear and side lot lines. The plans indicate parking spaces will be setback 10 feet from the adjacent property northeast of the site. Plans indicate that the Applicant would satisfy the requirements for off- street parking space setbacks. H. Number of Parking Stalls – Meets Requirements Per City Code 1325.06, there are general categories that determine the number of parking spaces that would need to be provided. Multiple family dwellings require 1.1 per efficiency and 1 bedroom dwelling units; 2 for each 2+ bedroom dwelling units and house of worships require 1 for every 3 seats (based on design capacity). In addition to these standards, multiple family dwellings that require a CUP shall provide a minimum of one enclosed parking stall per dwelling unit. Enclosed parking structures shall be attached to at least one of the principal structures to which parking is provided. With 119 units, the multiple family dwelling is required to provide 200 stalls and 119 of those stalls must be in an attached enclosed parking structure. The Applicant is proposing 254 parking stalls for the multifamily dwelling use, 150 of which would be located in the underground parking facility. Units Unit Counts Required Stalls Number of Stalls Provided Parking Surplus 1-bedroom units (1.1 parking stalls) 43 48 254 (150 underground) 54 2 or more bedrooms (2 parking stalls) 76 152 Total 119 200 The house of worship currently has capacity for 2,320 seats, for a parking requirement of 774 parking stalls. As a result of the subdivision of land, the house of worship will lose parking and as such the Applicant is proposing to construct an additional 82 parking stalls on the site as part of the Site Plan Review and PUD review. The house of worship is proposed to have 866 parking stalls. Plans indicate that the Applicant would satisfy the requirements for off-street parking stalls. Page 14 of 20 I. Traffic Study and Site Circulation – For Review The site currently has two access point to the Subject Property along County Highway 96 and Snelling Avenue North. No changes are proposed to the current configuration. As part of the application, the Applicant has provided a Traffic Review Memo (Attachment J) which references the future intended use of proposed Lot 1, Block 1. The memo notes that the overall impact of the intended use on area roadway capacity is expected to be minimal and that no significant issues are expected as a result of the proposed development from a traffic capacity perspective. In response to prior concept review comments from the City Council, the Applicant has shown in the renderings that vehicles leaving the apartment building will be signed as “Left Turn Only” with signage showing “No Right Turn” movements to reinforce traffic patterns towards Highway 96. The illustrations provided in the application show there will be a “Left Turn Only” marking at the access point of Highway 96. During the Planning Commission review, the Applicant confirmed this was not accurate and vehicles will be able to turn in both directions exiting onto Highway 96. Markings and signage will be installed at the drive aisle leaving the apartment building. A condition of approval is included below that the submitted plans be revised to show the markings and signage on the plans. Access to County Highway 96 from Submitted Renderings Access to right-of-way for proposed Lot 1, Block 1, will be shared with the existing access for proposed Lot 2, Block 1. A condition of approval is included below to require that a shared access agreement is recorded before the final plat can be recorded. The Applicant has submitted exhibits that detail how emergency vehicles and waste collection vehicles would traverse the site. The submitted plans indicate that the Applicant would satisfy the requirements for site circulation. Concerns regarding noise from the surrounding highways impacting future residents within the development were identified as a concern as part of previous reviews. The Applicant has submitted a Traffic Noise Assessment (Attachment K) has been prepared by David Braslau Associates, Inc. The assessment is attached to this report. The summary of findings within the report found that a higher level of glazing would be required on windows on the proposed multifamily dwelling to meet Minnesota noise rules. The assessment also analyzed the impact of sound on surrounding residential uses. This analysis found changes to surrounding properties that would not be easily detectable and no suggestions were made for this change. Page 15 of 20 J. Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation – For Review The Applicant has stated that this project will include pedestrian trails on the northwest side of the proposed apartment building. Pedestrian trails will be connected to the regional county trail system located along the south side of County Highway 96. In addition, concrete walkways will be constructed internal to the site allowing pedestrian movement to and from the church building. The Applicant is proposing bicycle parking as part of this development within the underground parking. The submitted Architectural Plans show 72 bicycle spaces. City Code requires that multifamily dwellings that require a CUP to provide enclosed bicycle parking at a rate of 0.5 spaces for every dwelling unit, for a total of 59.5 stalls. The submitted plans indicate that the Applicant would satisfy the requirements for pedestrian and bicycle circulation. K. Freestanding Signs –Meets Requirements The Subject Property is in Sign District 3 (i.e. all residential properties zoned R-3 and R-4) for the newly created Lot 1 and Sign District 2 (i.e. all non-residential uses in the R-1 through R-4) for the existing Lot 2. The Applicant has indicated that there will be no signs located on Lot 1 and that the existing sign located near the access to County Highway 96, and located on Lot 2, will be modified and expanded to include a sign to serve the use of Lot 1. Properties in Sign District 2 are allowed one freestanding sign with 48 square feet in copy area and not exceeding six feet in height. Freestanding signs shall be located at least five feet from any property line. Sign copy area is defined as the area in square feet of the smallest rectangle, circle, or triangle that contains the sign copy. Signs in Sign District 2 may be lit by external or internal illumination only. The existing sign that will be modified is an existing sign with internal illumination that will be modified. The applicant has indicated that the sign will be expanded to the south. The setback from the property line will be reduced due to the dedication of right-of-way but will still be consistent with the City Code. Limited information regarding the sign has been submitted. If any deviation from the established standards occurs, an additional review may be required. Proposed Freestanding Sign Page 16 of 20 4. Design Standards – Section 1325.045 Multi-family Dwelling Units Additional Conditional Use Permit Criteria A. Minimum Unit Size – Meets Requirements The City Code sets minimum unit size based on the type of unit within the multi-family dwelling. The Applicant is proposing one- and two-bedroom units. One-bedroom units must be a minimum of 700 square feet and two- bedroom units must be a minimum of 950 square feet. The Applicant is proposing a minimum unit size of 800 square feet for one-bedroom units and 975 square feet for two-bedroom units. B. Security Plan – For Review The Applicant has detailed a security plan in their narrative. Security will include surveillance cameras in common areas, exterior areas, surface lots, and underground garages. Controlled access will be used for entrances into the building. Exterior portions of the site will be illuminated through the fixtures shown on the lighting plan. C. Lighting Plan – Meets Requirements Lighting was reviewed above and met the standards within Section 1325.05. D. Parking – Meets Requirements A minimum of one enclosed parking stall shall be provided per dwelling unit. Enclosed parking structures shall be attached to at least one of the principal structures to which parking is provided. Parking was reviewed above and the plans appear to meet the requirements established in the City Code. E. Common Area – Meets Requirements Common area devoted to recreation or leisure activities shall be provided. Common area must include a combination of both indoor and outdoor space. The Applicant states 15 features and amenities in their narrative that are both indoor and outdoor. These include an indoor community room and an outdoor patio. F. Efficiency Apartments – Meets Requirements The number of efficiency units in a multiple dwelling shall not exceed fifteen (15) percent of the total number of apartments. The Applicant is not proposing any efficiency apartments. G. Bicycle Parking – Meets Requirements Enclosed bicycle parking shall be provided at a rate of 0.5 spaces for every dwelling unit. Bicycle parking was reviewed above and the applicant is providing 72 bicycle parking stalls for a ratio of 0.6 stalls per unit. H. Window Coverings – For Review All windows which are visible to the outside shall be provided with window treatments. Window treatments shall be consistent throughout each multi-family dwelling structure or development. Page 17 of 20 The Applicant has not provided any information regarding window coverings. Compliance with the requirements for window coverings will be done as part of an inspection of the building once construction has begun. 5. Procedural Requirements for Specific Applications – Section 1355.04 A public hearing for a CUP and PUD request is required before the request can be brought before the City Council. The applicant or its representative shall be given the opportunity to appear before the Planning Commission to answer questions or give explanations regarding the proposal. Upon completion of the public hearing and its study and consideration of the application, the Planning Commission shall submit its written report, containing its findings, conclusions, and recommendations as to the application, to the City Council. Plan Evaluation Summary The table below provides the performance standards for the R-4 District and the preliminary analysis for the proposed development. Requirements where the submitted plans are inconsistent with City Code and require revision are highlighted in grey. Requirements where the Applicant has requested flexibility are highlighted in orange: Ordinance Requirements R-4 District Standards Proposed Development Minimum Lot Area (per dwelling unit) 3,630 sq. ft. 468,025 sq. ft. 3,933 sq. ft. Maximum Floor Area Ratio 0.3 0.35 Maximum Building Height 35 feet ~ 38 feet Maximum Structure Coverage 25% 12% Minimum Landscape Lot Area 65% 74% Minimum Front Yard Setback 40 feet 96.9 feet Minimum Rear Yard Setback 30 feet 86.5 feet Minimum Side Yard Setback 10 feet (min)/15 feet (total) 65.6 feet/ ~ 474 feet PUD & SUP Maximum Dwelling Unit Density Per Net Acre 12 units 13.9 units Minimum Parking Requirements (Dwelling, multiple family) 1.1 per efficiency and 1 bedroom dwelling units; 2 for each 2+ bedroom dwelling units (Total Required- 195 spaces) 254 stalls Off-Street Parking Setbacks 20 feet from ROW 10 feet from property lines 119 feet from ROW 10 feet from property lines Lighting Not to exceed one foot candle on the travel lanes of adjoining public streets 0.1-foot candles shown on photometric plan Screening/Fencing Screened from residential uses Vegetative screening along western boundaries Landscaping - Planting Islands 10% of parking area 15% of parking area Landscaping – Tree Mitigation 752 caliper inches required for replacement 752 caliper inches proposed for replacement Trees located in D&U easements Trees >2.5 caliper inches Landscaping – Boulevard and Island Trees Boulevard Trees – 39 Island Trees – 14 Boulevard Trees – 38, Existing Vegetation Island Trees – 24 Page 18 of 20 Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation Provide circulation plan and bike rack Bicycle parking provided for residents Additional Review Building Official The Building Official has reviewed the plans and has no additional comments at this time. A Building Permit will be required prior to any construction taking place. Public Works Director/City Engineer The Public Works Director/City Engineer has reviewed the plans. A memorandum has been prepared by the Public Works Director/City Engineer and included as Attachment M. Fire Marshal The Fire Marshal is currently reviewing the plans. No additional conditions have been included at this time Ramsey County Ramsey County has reviewed the plans and submitted a statement submitted December 3, 2024, that addresses traffic/access, programming, and permitting. Comments included: • County Road 96 and church access intersection is anticipated be signalized as part of the Rice Creek Commons development, this development should present minimal issues to the county’s roadway system • Development access intersection with CSAH 96 will be shared with access to the Rice Creek Commons site to the north. If construction will take place simultaneously, coordination between contractors will be required. Minnesota Department of Transportation MnDOT has reviewed the plans and submitted a letter dated November 27, 2024, that addresses noise, surveys, and required permits. The letter is included as Attachment N. United States Fish and Wildlife Service FWL did not provide comments at the time of writing this report. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources The Area Hydrologist stated that the plans appear to be consistent with the requirements, including those for open space and density, in Minnesota rules for residential PUDs in shoreland. Planning Commission Review The Planning Commission reviewed this application at the December 4, 2024 meeting. The Commission discussed the discretion the City has in reviewing the application, the park dedication fees, traffic controls, the lack of affordable housing in the proposal, the density of the proposal, landscaping and tree management, access to the site, and internal circulation of traffic. The Commission voted 5-2 to recommend denial of Planning Case 24-018 with the following findings: Page 19 of 20 1. The application is not consistent with the policies within Chapter 6 of the Comprehensive Plan: Land Use, or within and the goals of Chapter 7 of the Comprehensive Plan: Housing, that encourage the incorporation of affordable and life-cycle housing into new development and redevelopment where feasible. 2. The request for additional density, floor area ratio, and building height is not consistent with Section 1355.04 Subd. 3.B of the City Code in that the proposed development does not meet the goals for population density and the orderly development of the neighborhood and the city within the general purpose and intent of this Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Plan for the City. Since the December Planning Commission meeting, the Applicant has submitted a supplemental narrative to address the concerns discussed at the meeting which is included in this memo as Attachment O. The Applicant has stated the goals of the City’s Comprehensive Plans that the feel they are meeting. The Applicant has also stated that they will provide 10 units at 80% or less of the Area Median Income (AMI). Housing that has controlled prices under this value is considered affordable. The proposed rate for these units is estimated to be $336 and $625 per month. To accommodate these affordable units, the Applicant has stated that they would be looking for a cost savings of at least $1,300,000 for the development. The Applicant has proposed this be achieved through a cash contribution or a reduction and/or waiver of City fees and charges. The Applicant has not stated the size or type of unit, nor have they indicated a time when the affordable units would be transitioned to market rate. The City Council has the authority to waive the public use and park dedication fees required with the subdivision of the property as described in Section 1130.08. The City does have additional processes and means to provide financial support or business subsidies to projects that meet specific purposes. These standards are established in the City of Arden Hills Business Subsidy Criteria and City Public Financing Guidelines, (Public Financing Guidelines) dated July 27, 2015. This process allows for the City to consider public financing through tax increment financing, tax abatement, bonds, waiver of City fees (excluding building permits), and other forms of public financing, provided a development meets the criteria set within the standards. With the late addition of the affordable units, staff have not been able to evaluate the proposed project under these standards. For the project to move forward with any kind of financial support that is detailed within Public Financing Guidelines, the Applicant would need to waive their rights to a timely review under Minnesota Statute 15.99. The Applicant has already extended this deadline to January 13, 2025, and without their consent to extend, the City must act on PC 24-018 and the tabled request for Rezoning PC 24-015. The Applicant also stated that the flexibility requested for F.A.R, maximum building height, and density are appropriate based on the standards that have been exceeded. Public Comments Notice was published in the Pioneer Press on December 24, 2024. Notice was prepared by the City and mailed to property owners within 1,000 feet of the subject property. The City received one comment prior to the Planning Commission opposing the project due to concerns with drainage and building placement. Page 20 of 20 The City had previously received written comments for the preliminary plat and rezoning review which included concerns regarding traffic generation, noise, drainage, and the number of senior facilities within the City. Attachments A. Land Use Application B. Location Map C. Narrative D. Civil and Landscape Plans E. Final Plat F. Easement Vacation Exhibits G. Architectural Plans/Renderings H. Exterior Materials I. Lighting Plan J. Traffic Study K. Traffic Noise Assessment L. Tree Survey M. Memorandum to City Engineer, dated November 20, 2024 N. MnDOT Review Letter, dated November 27, 2024 O. Ramsey County Comments P. Supplemental Narrative from Applicant Q. PC Staff Report R. “10A. Planning Case 24-015 – Preliminary Plat and Rezoning – Trident Development, LLC – 1700 West Highway 96 (North Heights Lutheran Church)”, Arden Hills City Council, September 9, 2024 S. Draft PC Minutes T. Presentation Attachment A PC 24-018 Personal Property Tax Parcels Cities County Offices 11/25/2024, 6:32:42 PM 0 0.25 0.50.13 mi 0 0.4 0.80.2 km 1:16,000 Ramsey County Ramsey County MN Attachment B Page 1 of 12 1200 25th Avenue South ● St. Cloud, MN 56301 Phone: 320.258.4438 ● 320.252.3603 REVISED November 4, 2024 Ms. Elena Fransen, Senior Planner Members of the Arden Hills City Council & Planning Commission City of Arden Hills 1245 West Highway 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112 HAND DELIVERED and VIA EMAIL: efransen@cityofardenhills.org and thofer@cityofardenhills.org RE: NORTH HEIGHTS LUTHERAN CHURCH PROPERTY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, SITE PLAN, FINAL PLAT AND VACATION OF EASEMENT NARRATIVE Ms. Fransen and Members of the City Council/ Planning Commission: Trident Development, LLC is pleased to present this request for Conditional Use Permit (CUP), Planned Unit Development (PUD), Master PUD, Final Plat, Easement Vacation and Site Plan for property located near the intersection of County Highway 96 and U.S Highway 10 in Arden Hills. The Site is currently located within the North Heights Lutheran Church property boundaries located at 1700 County Highway 96 which encompasses approximately 41 acres. The intended use is a high-density residential development. A CUP is required for high density residential use in an R4 zoning district. This use is consistent with the underlying Comprehensive Guide Plan and the development plan generally complies with the performance standards in the R4 zoning ordinance. OVERVIEW: • 119 units, age restricted (55+), senior independent living apartment. • High-amenity market-rate rental community (not income restricted). • 3-stories of habitable space above ground; wood framed-construction with a pitched-roof. • 1-story of parking garage below ground; concrete construction. • Access from County Highway 96. • Comprehensive Plan Amendment approved in 2022. • Preliminary Plat and Rezoning approved September 9, 2024 (rezoning tabled at Council) • Construction is estimated to commence Spring 2025 with completion anticipated in Spring/Summer 2026. $WWDFKPHQW& Page 2 of 12 REQUEST: Trident Development, LLC is requesting approval of the following: • Conditional Use Permit (CUP) • Planned Unit Development (PUD) • Master PUD • Final Plat • Easement Vacations • Site Plan ENCLOSED • Updated Site Plan / Parking Plan / Landscape Plan / Lighting Plan • Updated Architectural 3-D renderings, elevations, floor plans • Civil engineering plans – grading/utilities/drainage plans • Supplemental reports including wetlands report, traffic study, noise study, geotech • Supplemental Details – Exhibit A. After you have an opportunity to review the application submittal materials, please let us know of any questions or concerns. Respectfully, Andy Brummer Trident Development, LLC Page 3 of 12 EXHIBIT A: SUPPLEMENTAL DETAILS [following pages] Page 4 of 12 OWNERSHIP REPORT Record Owner of the property: North Heights Lutheran Church, a Minnesota corporation Applicant: Trident Development, LLC a Minnesota limited liability company Address of Owner: 1700 Highway 96 West, Arden Hills, MN 55112 Phone Number of Owner: (651) 797-7801, John Oldfield Address of Applicant: 1200 – 25th Avenue South, St. Cloud, MN 56301 Phone Number of Applicant: (612) 242-6097, Roger Fink It is understood that the city will notify/contact all adjoining property owners within 350-feet of the Subject Property. Page 5 of 12 GENERAL DESCRIPTION North Heights Lutheran Church currently owns approximately 41-acres of land situated on the southeast corner of County Highway 96 and US Highway 10, of which the subject property (approximately 10.75+/- acres) will be subdivided from and conveyed to the developer for this proposed project. This proposed project will include a professionally managed, high-amenity, market-rate, senior (age 55+), apartment building. The building will be designed as a 119 unit, 3-story, wood-framed structure with a pitched roof, and heated underground parking. The building will include wood-framed construction on a pre- stressed concrete plank deck over an underground parking garage, with hydraulic elevator service. This senior independent living building will include a wide scope of amenities and generous landscaping. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN The architectural design is expected to implement a sloped roof, together with entrance gables and vertical bump outs providing visual interest. A variety of complimentary exterior building material colors are proposed to create visual appeal and soften the mass of the building size and will include the following: - LP Smartside, 2-tone lap siding - Vertical metal siding - Thin brick veneer - Vinyl patio doors and windows - Metal entry canopies - Architectural grade, asphalt shingles - Powder-coated metal balconies - Pre-finished, metal flashing and trim As discussed, the physical examples of the exterior material will be provided by November 20, 2024. The developer has engaged HMA Architects to design, draft, and submit building plans, elevations, and visual renderings. DWELLING UNITS This project will offer a variety of market-rate senior independent living apartment units. This project does not include income-restricted units. Below are current preliminary unit projections. Unit Style Total Quantity Square Feet 1-bedroom units 15 7-15% 800 - 1,000 +/- 1-bedroom + den 28 25-30% 900 - 1,100 +/- 2-bedroom 54 35-45% 975 - 1,200 +/- 2-bedroom + den 22 17-25% 1,050 - 1,350 +/- Unit sizing provided above does not include breezeways, common hallways, balconies, and porch floor spaces. Each apartment unit is currently anticipated to be furnished with: • Wall-to-wall carpeting in bedrooms • Luxury vinyl plank flooring in kitchen, baths and laundry rooms • Designer door hardware, light fixtures and faucets Page 6 of 12 • Complete stainless steel kitchen appliances including: refrigerator, electric range/oven, built-in micro-waves, dish washers. • Each unit is equipped with a washer and dryer • Heat and A/C is provided by “magic pack” equipment with individual controls • Generous closet space • Balconies or private patios • Window coverings on all windows and within all units FEATURES & AMENITIES This apartment community is anticipated to include the following amenities and features: • Generous entry lobby with attractive seating • Community room for resident parties, group functions, and family gatherings • Spacious outdoor patio and grill area • Rooftop sky lounge with outdoor fireplace, connected by party room • Heated underground parking • Car wash bay • Pet grooming area • Craft/Workshop Room • Fitness center with gym-quality equipment • Private tenant storage lockers • Centralized mail delivery area, with automated parcel handling system • Security and surveillance camera system; controlled access entry system • Extensive open space and trail system • Activities and events programing • Professional on-site management CODE ANALYSIS: Pursuant to the R-4 Multiple Dwelling Zoning District, improvements constructed are required to meet the following performance standards: • Maximum Density: 12 units per acre • Minimum off-street parking: 1 space for each 1 BR or efficiency unit + 2 spaces for each 2 BR or 3 BR unit with at least 1 covered space per dwelling unit. • Minimum Lot Area: 3,630 SF per dwelling unit • Maximum Impervious Surface: 35% of lot area • Minimum Landscaped Area: 65% of lot area • Minimum set-backs: 40’ Front Yard, 40’ Rear Yard, 15’ Side Yard • Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 3.0 • Maximum Building Height: 35 feet The current development plan complies with the above performance standards with the exception of the maximum FAR, and building height which is further explained below and will be addressed through the PUD/CUP application and process. Page 7 of 12 LAND USE Based on developer’s review and interpretation of City Zoning Code, the R4 Multiple Family District does allow for multi-family apartment buildings with CUP. Developer is proposing an age-restricted (55+), multi- family, apartment community. FINAL PLAT A Preliminary Plat for Lots 1 & 2, Block 1, Arden Heights was approved by the City on September 9, 2024. The Final Plat and Vacation of Easements exhibits are provided within this narrative and application cycle. Developer is requesting the vacation of four easements described in Document No. 2278852 granting City of Arden Hills a perpetual easement for ponding and flowage of water on, over, upon and across four described parcels. Said vacated easements will be corrected, updated and re-dedicated on the Final Plat. LOT SIZE & DENSITY Based on developer’s review and interpretation of City Zoning Code, the R4 Multiple Family District allows for a minimum lot area of 3,630 sf per dwelling unit. The subject property is approximately +/- 10.75-acres, or 468,025 sf. 468,025 sf / 3,630 sf = 129 maximum units. Current development plan proposes 119 dwelling units. NOTE: this site is also encumbered by the City’s Shoreland Overlay District. Said district requires a minimum lot size of 40,000 sf. It is the Developers interpretation that this proposed project complies with said section of City Zoning Code. FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) Based on developer’s review and interpretation of City Zoning Code, the R4 Multiple Family District allows for a maximum FAR of 0.3. The proposed building footprint is approximately 54,200 sf and includes three floors of dwelling/habitable space, for an approximate total of 162,600 sf (note: garage not included in calculation). 162,600 sf of dwelling/habitable space / 468,025 sf total lot size = .347 FAR. Developer believes a deviation to City Zoning Code for maximum FAR is required and will be addressed through the PUD application and process. Developer is requesting flexibility in the maximum Floor Area Ratio requirement. Flexibility for a minor deviation in floor area ratio is fair and reasonable based on the overall development design. Lowering the FAR by 0.47 would result in reducing amenity spaces for the residents. TABULATION OF BLOCKS, LOTS, STREET LENGTH AND AREA, TRAILS Block 1 area: 1,790,441 SF Lot 1 area: 1,322,416 SF Lot 2 area: 468,025 SF No Streets Trails/Sidewalks Overall: 37,224 SF Trails/Sidewalks Lot 1: 24,327 SF Trails/Sidewalks Lot 2: 12,897 SF Lot 1 is the church and Lot 2 is the proposed apartment. Page 8 of 12 BUILDING & IMPERVIOUS SURFACE LOT COVERAGE Impervious Surface: Based on developer’s review and interpretation of City Zoning Code, the R4 zoning district allows for a maximum 35% impervious surface. The current plan proposes a total impervious surface on Lot 2 of 26% of lot area, which is less than the percentage required by City Code. The church property (Lot 1), is zoned R1 which allows for a maximum 35% impervious surface. After completing the proposed parking improvements to Lot 1 (church), the impervious surface area of Lot 1 is calculated at 35%. This calculation includes the removal of approximately 71 parking stalls from Lot 1. Lot Coverage: Based on developer’s review and interpretation of City Zoning Code, The R-4 zoning district established a maximum lot coverage of 25%. The proposed building footprint is approximately 54,200 sf. 54,200 sf building footprint / 468,025 sf total lot size = 11.58% building lot coverage. The proposed building lot coverage is less than the maximum allowed per Code. NOTE: this site is also encumbered by the City’s Shoreland Overlay District. Said district requires a maximum impervious surface coverage of 35%. It is the Developers interpretation that this proposed project complies with said section of City Zoning Code. LANDSCAPING LOT COVERAGE Based on developer’s review and interpretation of City Zoning Code, the R4 Multiple Family District requires a minimum landscaping coverage of 65%. The subject property is approximately +/- 10.75-acres in gross size. About half of the property is physically buildable, the remaining portions include wetlands, drainage, lowlands, steep slopes, or are inaccessible. The current development plan meets or exceeds the landscape coverage requirement. See landscaping plan submitted as part of this narrative and application. BUILDING HEIGHT Based on developer’s review and interpretation of City Zoning Code, the R4 Multiple Family District allows for a maximum building of 35’, which is based on the average height between eaves and the peak of a pitched roof. The proposed building includes an approximate eave height of 32’, and an approximate highest roof peak height of 44’ resulting in an average building height of 38 feet. Developer requests flexibility to City Zoning Code for maximum building height. Developer currently estimates a deviation of 3 feetis required. This minor deviation will result in a higher quality development allowing for 9-foot-high ceilings in all dwelling units and a 6:12 roof pitch. BUILDING SETBACKS Based on developer’s review and interpretation of City Zoning Code, the R4 Multiple Family District requires the following minimum building setbacks: 40’ front yard, 40’ rear yard, 5’ side yard/15’ interior, 40’ side yard corner. The proposed project includes building setbacks that exceed the City’s required minimums—please see enclosed site plan for details. The current development plan meets or exceeds the required minimum building setback dimensions. NOTE: this site is also encumbered by the City’s Shoreland Overlay District. Said district requires a minimum building setback from streets and highways of 40’. It is the developer’s interpretation that the development plans comply with the City Zoning Code. Page 9 of 12 PARKING Based on developer’s review and interpretation of City Zoning Code, the R4 Multiple Family District requires the following minimum parking provisions: 1.1 per studio, 1.1 per 1-bedroom, 2 for 2-bedroom. The following is the current approximate assumption. Example, based on 119 Units % of Units # of Units City Req. Stalls Provided 1 Bbd/ 1 Bbd + Den Proposed = 15-25% 43 47.3 98 2 Bbd/ 2 Bbd + Den Proposed = 20-50% 76 152 156 199.3 254 Currently 104 standard surface stalls (including the required ADA stalls) and 150 underground stalls are planned and therefore, the current parking plan exceeds the minimum parking requirements. It is understood that a minimum of one enclosed (underground) parking stall shall be provided per dwelling unit. VEHICLE ACCESS Site access for vehicles will be provided by the existing access drive from County Highway 96 by way of a permanent access agreement with the church. The access drive lane is over 54 feet wide with a center median to improve traffic flow. To enhance traffic safety, a right turn lane exists on CR 96 at the entrance drive, along with a dedicated left turn lane for westbound traffic on CR 96. The access agreement will encumber Lot 1 and Lot 2 and will be a condition of the PUD Agreement. A secondary access drive, serving the church property does exist which intersects with Snelling Ave N. The plan proposes to add a median which will be installed at the site entrance on Snelling Ave N. The median, along with a slight bump out on the southern curb of the entrance are meant to deter any traffic from exiting south on Snelling Avenue N. The median will consist of B612 curb, with a taper to bituminous grades at the connection to Snelling Avenue N. This modification is intended to complement the existing signage at the intersection, discouraging use of this secondary drive by occupants of the new lot. Internal to the site, care will be placed in the design of the parking lot to allow for the flow and circulation of both residents’ vehicles and larger vehicles; such as fire apparatus and delivery trucks; which allow delivery trucks to safely and efficiently enter the site. The developer has included a 24’ wide internal circulation dive lane for parking areas, and a 20’ wide fire department access road around the rear of the building—which includes a turn-around provision. The current site plan provides a turning movement exhibit which accommodates fire apparatus and delivery trucks. Currently, the main entrance and the Snelling Avenue intersection with Highway 96 are not signalized. A future signal is planned for the North Heights entrance with the construction of the main TCAAP roadway to the north. TRAFFIC A traffic study was prepared for the project by Transportation Collaborative & Consultants, LLC and dated June 28, 2024. The objective of the review was to estimate the trip generation of the proposed development, qualitatively assess any transportation impacts to the adjacent roadway network and identify potential improvements and/or considerations for the site. According to the report, the overall impact on area roadway capacity is expected to be minimal and no significant issues are expected as a result of the proposed development from an intersection/roadway capacity perspective. See further information in the Vehicle Access portion of this narrative for proposed action. A copy of the Traffic report is included with this application. Page 10 of 12 BICYCLE PARKING The current plan proposes 119 dwelling units x .5 spaces required per unit = 60 bicycle parking spaces. Approximately 72 covered bicycle storage/parking spaces are provided in the underground parking garage in designated areas. See updated floor plans submitted with this narrative for location and sizing of bike racks. FIRE SAFETY An automatic fire suppression system is provided throughout the building (NFP 13), which will be monitored 24 hours a day. The developer will work with Fire Department and Building Official to properly locate the FDC, riser room, mechanical room, fire suppression controls/ systems, and a lock box. Fire hydrants locations are shown on the utility plans included with this narrative. TRASH/ RECYCLING Trash is collected in designated trash rooms located in the underground parking garage. Trash rooms will be served by trash chutes accessible to all floors of the building. No trash/refuse area is proposed outside of the building. Property management staff will bring trash bins to bottom of parking ramp so that garbage pickup does not occur within the parking garage, therefore truck circulation for garbage collection is not provided within this narrative. TRAILS This project will include pedestrian trails on the northwest side of the proposed apartment building. Pedestrian trails will be connected to the regional county trail system located along the south side of County Highway 96. In addition, concrete walkways will be included on the southeast/east side of the building adjacent to the parking lot allowing pedestrian movement to and from the church building. WATER & SANITARY SEWER Metropolitan Council sanitary sewer is available and will be connected to the development from U.S. Highway 10. City water services are also available at County Highway 96 to serve the development. See civil engineering plans submitted with this narrative. STORM WATER & GRADING The existing site grade generally flows from the northeast to the southwest—towards Round Lake. The storm water management plan provides for a large storm water pond located directly south of the apartment building. Additionally, due to space constraints and newly designed church parking lot plans, underground stormwater storage tanks are utilized as part of the storm water management plan. See civil engineering plans submitted with this narrative. WETLANDS The developer engaged Kjolhaug Environmental Services to conduct a wetland delineation for the subject property. Results are included within this submittal. Important notes: 1. The City has existing drainage/wetland easements in place today. Said existing easements are no longer in alignment with actual wetlands. There are now delineated wetlands located outside of the existing easement areas; and there are also areas within the original easements that no longer contain delineated wetlands. Page 11 of 12 2. The current development plans require the above-mentioned item #1 will be addressed through this project. Specifically, the original easements will be officially vacated by the City; and a new replacement easement will be recorded based on the recently completed wetland delineation. NOISE/GLARE A Traffic Noise Assessment has been prepared by David Braslau Associates, Inc., dated September 30, 2024. This assessment measured the traffic noise generated from U.S. Highway 10 and Trunk Highway 96 during peak traffic hours. The study also analyzed the anticipated sound reflection from the proposed building to the residential properties on the southwest side of US Hwy 10. The traffic noise assessment concluded that sound reflection from the proposed building would be negligible/non-existent to residents across Hwy 10. The assessment further recommended an upgrade in the window STC specifications for portions of the proposed building. Developer anticipates adding windows with higher STC ratings according to the noise study findings. A copy of the Traffic Noise Assessment report is included with this application. LANDSCAPING PLAN A landscaping plan has been prepared and is included within this application. The landscape planting plan meets or exceeds the minimum landscape planting requirements. Further, in compliance with the tree preservation/replacement plan, 84 tree planting are proposed to be “off-site”. The “off-site” plantings are proposed to be located on adjacent Lot 1 (church property). TREE SURVEY AND PRESERVATION PLAN A tree survey and preservation plan has been prepared and is included within this application. Note: please also refer to comments made under “Landscaping Plan” above regarding tree preservation plan. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT The stormwater management plan proposed in the final plat meets or exceeds the rules and requirements of the Rice Creek Watershed District. Underground storage chambers are utilized in addition to a sedimentation pond for controlling the rate of discharge and filtering out sediment. Surface drainage is collected by catch basins and directed to the sedimentation pond or to the underground storage chambers. Treated stormwater is discharged into a nearby wetland basin. See civil engineering plans provided for the proposed locations. SECURITY PLAN The security plan for this development will include surveillance cameras placed throughout common areas, exterior areas, surface lot and underground garage. A controlled access entry system (fob keys) will be utilized for entrance to all access points of the building. Individual unit doors are also controlled by a secured key fob entry system. A generous exterior lighting package is provided for added security and mobility after dark. SIGNAGE A new apartment entrance sign will replace the existing, permitted church sign and will be in conformance with District 2 sign standards. No changes are proposed for the church signage along Highway 10. Per the requirements of Zoning Ordinance Section 1240.02, the monument sign is 4’-4” high from landscape edging (Zoning Ordinance 1240.01 Table 1 allows for 8 ft), and the overall signage area of the sign is 2’-0” high x 16’- Page 12 of 12 0” long = 32 sf (excluding base) which meets the requirements of 1240.01 Table 1), placement of the sign will be on the existing entrance median, and is approximately 40’-0” setback from the assumed property line. The sign will be internally lit. Structural components showing materials, fabrication and mounting system will be provided with submission of the Sign Permit. There will not be signage on the proposed building except for the required address numbers required by the City. Sign building materials will resemble the proposed building with brick, and new landscaping. At this time, the design of the entrance sign has not been finalized with the church but will be placed in the same location. See proposed depiction below: PARK DEDICATION The Public Use Dedication requirement for residential subdivisions for High Density Residential is 20%. If 20% of the land is not available for dedication, a cash contribution in lieu of land dedication may be required, and the cash payment shall be determined based on the fair market value of the land that would otherwise be dedicated to the City. This is still to be determined by City of Arden Hills. It is anticipated that a cash contribution in lieu of land dedication will be made as part of our development approvals. NORTH HEIGHTS CHURCH CAMPUS IMPROVEMENTS This senior living apartment project includes offsite improvements—not within the primary subject apartment property. Offsite improvements will be located on the existing/remaining North Heights Lutheran Church campus. Improvements generally include: • Re-seal and re-stripe existing church parking lot. • Expansion and redesign of church parking lot primarily in the following areas: o Addition of approximately 82 stalls directly east of the proposed apartment. o The net result for North Heights Lutheran Church will reduce the surface parking stall count from 866 total stalls to 795 parking stalls, prior to this apartment project—as the apartment building requires taking of land currently utilized by the church for parking. o Existing parking stalls at the church: 866 surface parking stalls o Proposed parking stalls at the church: 795 surface parking stalls o Required parking stalls is based on seating capacity. Its understood 2,320 seats exist at the church which results in a total of 774 required parking stalls. • The above-mentioned parking lot expansion will require the creation of a new storm water cell. The storm water cell is proposed to be located directly west of the apartment north arm. The north arm cell will assist the apartment stormwater management. Know what's below. before you dig.Call R C1 CO V E R NORTH HEIGHTS APARTMENTS f: \ j o b s \ 9 3 2 1 - 9 3 4 0 \ 9 3 2 7 - n o r t h h e i g h t s c h u r c h s i t e \ c a d c 3 d \ e n g i n e e r i n g \ 9 3 2 7 _ c o v e r . d w g Sa v e D a t e : 10 / 3 1 / 2 4 of 8 REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: ISSUE DATE:07/01/24 Name: Signature: Date:07/01/24 License #: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota 1. 07/17/24 Per City Comments TR I D E N T D E V E L O P M E N T , L L C 12 0 0 2 5 T H A V E N U E S ST . C L O U D , M N 5 6 3 0 1 NO R T H H E I G H T S A D D I T I O N Ar d e n H i l l s , M i n n e s o t a Dan J. Wilke, P.E. DJW DJW 53182 2. 10/01/24 Submitted for CUP 3. 10/08/24 Per City Comments 4. 10/11/24 Per City Comments 5. 10/16/24 SE Parking Lot Removed 6. 11/01/24 Per City Comments 7. 11/15/24 Per City Comments $WWDFKPHQW' E X C E P T I O N E X C E P T I O N STA T E T R U N K H I G H W A Y N O . 1 0 C. S . A . H . N O . 9 6 SNELLING AVENUE N. KEITHSON DRIVE RO Y A L H I L L S DR I V E MC C L U N G DR I V E (S E E S H E E T S C2.1 & C2.3 F O R D E T A I L S) (S E E S H E E T S C2.1 , C2.2 , & C2.3 F O R D E T A I L S) (S E E S H E E T C 2 . 1 F O R D E T A I L S ) OWNER: OWNER: OWNER: OWNER: OWNER: OWNER: OWNER: of EX I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S TR I D E N T D E V E L O P M E N T , L L C 12 0 0 - 2 5 t h A v e n u e S . St . C l o u d , M N 5 6 3 0 1 REVISIONS 3. 10/08/24 City Comments 4. 10/11/24 City Comments 5. 11/1/24 City Comments 6. 11/15/24 City Comments DRAWN BY: ISSUE DATE: bjs/NJS 7/01/24 f: \ j o b s \ 9 3 2 1 - 9 3 4 0 \ 9 3 2 7 - n o r t h h e i g h t s c h u r c h s i t e \ c a d c 3 d \ s u r v e y \ p r e - p l a t \ 9 3 2 7 _ x c o n - o v e r a l l . d w g Sa v e D a t e : 10 / 3 1 / 2 4 FILE NO:2273 LEGEND 8 C2.0 AR D E N H E I G H T S A D D I T I O N Ar d e n H i l l s , M i n n e s o t a 1 7/17/24 per City Comments 2. 10/01/24 Submitted for CUP – Thomas R. BalluffName: Signature: 7/1/2024 License #:40361 I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. E X C E P T I O N SNELLING AVENUE N. KE I T H S O N DR I V E of EX I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S TR I D E N T D E V E L O P M E N T , L L C 12 0 0 - 2 5 t h A v e n u e S . St . C l o u d , M N 5 6 3 0 1 REVISIONS 2. 10/01/24 Submitted for CUP 3. 10/08/24 City Comments 4. 10/11/24 City Comments 5. 11/1/24 City Comments 6. 11/15/24 City Comments DRAWN BY: ISSUE DATE: bjs/NJS f: \ j o b s \ 9 3 2 1 - 9 3 4 0 \ 9 3 2 7 - n o r t h h e i g h t s c h u r c h s i t e \ c a d c 3 d \ s u r v e y \ p r e - p l a t \ 9 3 2 7 _ x c o n i n s e t s 2 - 4 . d w g Sa v e D a t e : 10 / 3 1 / 2 4 FILE NO:2273 8 C2.1 LEGEND C. S . A . H . N O . 9 6 North Heights Lutheran Church 7/01/24 AR D E N H E I G H T S A D D I T I O N Ar d e n H i l l s , M i n n e s o t a 1. 7/17/24 per City Comments OWNER: Thomas R. BalluffName: Signature: 7/1/2024 License #:40361 I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. STA T E H I G H W A Y N O . 1 0 C. S . A . H . N O . 9 6 of EX I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S TR I D E N T D E V E L O P M E N T , L L C 12 0 0 - 2 5 t h A v e n u e S . St . C l o u d , M N 5 6 3 0 1 REVISIONS 2. 10/01/24 Submitted for CUP 4. 10/11/24 City Comments 5. 11/1/24 City Comments 6. DRAWN BY: ISSUE DATE: bjs/NJS f: \ j o b s \ 9 3 2 1 - 9 3 4 0 \ 9 3 2 7 - n o r t h h e i g h t s c h u r c h s i t e \ c a d c 3 d \ s u r v e y \ p r e - p l a t \ 9 3 2 7 _ x c o n i n s e t s 2 - 4 . d w g Sa v e D a t e : 10 / 3 1 / 2 4 FILE NO:2273 8 C2.2 LEGEND North Heights Lutheran Church 7/01/04 AR D E N H E I G H T S A D D I T I O N Ar d e n H i l l s , M i n n e s o t a 1. 7/17/24 per City Comments Thomas R. BalluffName: Signature: 7/1/2024 License #:40361 I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 3. 10/08/24 City Comments STA T E T R U N K H I G H W A Y N O . 1 0 E X C E P T I O N RO Y A L H I L L S DR I V E MC C L U N G DR I V E SNELLING AVENUE N. of EX I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S TR I D E N T D E V E L O P M E N T , L L C 12 0 0 - 2 5 t h A v e n u e S . St . C l o u d , M N 5 6 3 0 1 REVISIONS 2. 10/01/24 Submitted for CUP 4. 10/11/24 City Comments 5. 11/1/24 City Comments 6. DRAWN BY: ISSUE DATE: bjs/NJS 7/01/24 AR D E N H E I G H T S A D D I T I O N Ar d e n H i l l s , M i n n e s o t a f: \ j o b s \ 9 3 2 1 - 9 3 4 0 \ 9 3 2 7 - n o r t h h e i g h t s c h u r c h s i t e \ c a d c 3 d \ s u r v e y \ p r e - p l a t \ 9 3 2 7 _ x c o n i n s e t s 2 - 4 . d w g Sa v e D a t e : 10 / 3 1 / 2 4 FILE NO:2273 8 C2.3 LEGEND OWNER: OWNER: OWNER: OWNER: OWNER: OWNER: 1. 7/17/24 per City Comments Thomas R. BalluffName: Signature: 7/1/2024 License #:40361 I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 3. 10/08/24 City Comments Know what's below. before you dig.Call R C3 RE M O V A L S P L A N f: \ j o b s \ 9 3 2 1 - 9 3 4 0 \ 9 3 2 7 - n o r t h h e i g h t s c h u r c h s i t e \ c a d c 3 d \ e n g i n e e r i n g \ 9 3 2 7 _ r e m o v e . d w g Sa v e D a t e : 10 / 3 1 / 2 4 of 8 REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: ISSUE DATE:07/01/24 Name: Signature: Date:07/01/24 License #: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota 1. 07/17/24 Per City Comments TR I D E N T D E V E L O P M E N T , L L C 12 0 0 2 5 T H A V E N U E S ST . C L O U D , M N 5 6 3 0 1 NO R T H H E I G H T S A D D I T I O N Ar d e n H i l l s , M i n n e s o t a Dan J. Wilke, P.E. DJW DJW 53182 2. 10/01/24 Submitted for CUP 3. 10/08/24 Per City Comments 4. 10/11/24 Per City Comments 5. 10/16/24 SE Parking Lot Removed 6. 11/01/24 Per City Comments 7. 11/15/24 Per City Comments Know what's below. before you dig.Call R f: \ j o b s \ 9 3 2 1 - 9 3 4 0 \ 9 3 2 7 - n o r t h h e i g h t s c h u r c h s i t e \ c a d c 3 d \ e n g i n e e r i n g \ 9 3 2 7 _ s i t e . d w g Sa v e D a t e : 11 / 1 4 / 2 4 of 8 REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: ISSUE DATE:07/01/24 Name: Signature: Date:07/01/24 License #: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota 1. 07/17/24 Per City Comments TR I D E N T D E V E L O P M E N T , L L C 12 0 0 2 5 T H A V E N U E S ST . C L O U D , M N 5 6 3 0 1 NO R T H H E I G H T S A D D I T I O N Ar d e n H i l l s , M i n n e s o t a Dan J. Wilke, P.E. DJW DJW 53182 2. 10/01/24 Submitted for CUP 3. 10/08/24 Per City Comments 4. 10/11/24 Per City Comments 5. 10/16/24 SE Parking Lot Removed 6. 11/01/24 Per City Comments 7. 11/15/24 Per City Comments C4 SI T E P L A N f: \ j o b s \ 9 3 2 1 - 9 3 4 0 \ 9 3 2 7 - n o r t h h e i g h t s c h u r c h s i t e \ c a d c 3 d \ e n g i n e e r i n g \ 9 3 2 7 _ s i t e . d w g Sa v e D a t e : 11 / 1 4 / 2 4 of 8 REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: ISSUE DATE:07/01/24 Name: Signature: Date:07/01/24 License #: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota 1. 07/17/24 Per City Comments TR I D E N T D E V E L O P M E N T , L L C 12 0 0 2 5 T H A V E N U E S ST . C L O U D , M N 5 6 3 0 1 NO R T H H E I G H T S A D D I T I O N Ar d e n H i l l s , M i n n e s o t a Dan J. Wilke, P.E. DJW DJW 53182 2. 10/01/24 Submitted for CUP 3. 10/08/24 Per City Comments 4. 10/11/24 Per City Comments 5. 10/16/24 SE Parking Lot Removed 6. 11/01/24 Per City Comments 7. 11/15/24 Per City Comments Know what's below. before you dig.Call R C4.1 SI T E P L A N Know what's below. before you dig.Call R C4.2 SI T E P L A N f: \ j o b s \ 9 3 2 1 - 9 3 4 0 \ 9 3 2 7 - n o r t h h e i g h t s c h u r c h s i t e \ c a d c 3 d \ e n g i n e e r i n g \ 9 3 2 7 _ s i t e . d w g Sa v e D a t e : 11 / 1 4 / 2 4 of 8 REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: ISSUE DATE:07/01/24 Name: Signature: Date:07/01/24 License #: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota 1. 07/17/24 Per City Comments TR I D E N T D E V E L O P M E N T , L L C 12 0 0 2 5 T H A V E N U E S ST . C L O U D , M N 5 6 3 0 1 NO R T H H E I G H T S A D D I T I O N Ar d e n H i l l s , M i n n e s o t a Dan J. Wilke, P.E. DJW DJW 53182 2. 10/01/24 Submitted for CUP 3. 10/08/24 Per City Comments 4. 10/11/24 Per City Comments 5. 10/16/24 SE Parking Lot Removed 6. 11/01/24 Per City Comments 7. 11/15/24 Per City Comments Know what's below. before you dig.Call R f: \ j o b s \ 9 3 2 1 - 9 3 4 0 \ 9 3 2 7 - n o r t h h e i g h t s c h u r c h s i t e \ c a d c 3 d \ e n g i n e e r i n g \ 9 3 2 7 _ s i t e . d w g Sa v e D a t e : 11 / 1 4 / 2 4 of 8 REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: ISSUE DATE:07/01/24 Name: Signature: Date:07/01/24 License #: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota 1. 07/17/24 Per City Comments TR I D E N T D E V E L O P M E N T , L L C 12 0 0 2 5 T H A V E N U E S ST . C L O U D , M N 5 6 3 0 1 NO R T H H E I G H T S A D D I T I O N Ar d e n H i l l s , M i n n e s o t a Dan J. Wilke, P.E. DJW DJW 53182 2. 10/01/24 Submitted for CUP 3. 10/08/24 Per City Comments 4. 10/11/24 Per City Comments 5. 10/16/24 SE Parking Lot Removed 6. 11/01/24 Per City Comments 7. 11/15/24 Per City Comments C4.3 TU R N I N G A N A L Y S I S (E M E R G E N C Y V E H I C L E S ) Know what's below. before you dig.Call R f: \ j o b s \ 9 3 2 1 - 9 3 4 0 \ 9 3 2 7 - n o r t h h e i g h t s c h u r c h s i t e \ c a d c 3 d \ e n g i n e e r i n g \ 9 3 2 7 _ s i t e . d w g Sa v e D a t e : 11 / 1 4 / 2 4 of 8 REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: ISSUE DATE:07/01/24 Name: Signature: Date:07/01/24 License #: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota 1. 07/17/24 Per City Comments TR I D E N T D E V E L O P M E N T , L L C 12 0 0 2 5 T H A V E N U E S ST . C L O U D , M N 5 6 3 0 1 NO R T H H E I G H T S A D D I T I O N Ar d e n H i l l s , M i n n e s o t a Dan J. Wilke, P.E. DJW DJW 53182 2. 10/01/24 Submitted for CUP 3. 10/08/24 Per City Comments 4. 10/11/24 Per City Comments 5. 10/16/24 SE Parking Lot Removed 6. 11/01/24 Per City Comments 7. 11/15/24 Per City Comments C4.4 TU R N I N G A N A L Y S I S (G A R B A G E T R U C K ) C5 UT I L I T Y P L A N Know what's below. before you dig.Call R f: \ j o b s \ 9 3 2 1 - 9 3 4 0 \ 9 3 2 7 - n o r t h h e i g h t s c h u r c h s i t e \ c a d c 3 d \ e n g i n e e r i n g \ 9 3 2 7 _ u t i l i t y . d w g Sa v e D a t e : 10 / 3 1 / 2 4 of 8 REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: ISSUE DATE:07/01/24 Name: Signature: Date:07/01/24 License #: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota 1. 07/17/24 Per City Comments TR I D E N T D E V E L O P M E N T , L L C 12 0 0 2 5 T H A V E N U E S ST . C L O U D , M N 5 6 3 0 1 NO R T H H E I G H T S A D D I T I O N Ar d e n H i l l s , M i n n e s o t a Dan J. Wilke, P.E. DJW DJW 53182 2. 10/01/24 Submitted for CUP 3. 10/08/24 Per City Comments 4. 10/11/24 Per City Comments 5. 10/16/24 SE Parking Lot Removed 6. 11/01/24 Per City Comments 7. 11/15/24 Per City Comments Know what's below. before you dig.Call R C5.1 UT I L I T Y P L A N ST O R M S E W E R f: \ j o b s \ 9 3 2 1 - 9 3 4 0 \ 9 3 2 7 - n o r t h h e i g h t s c h u r c h s i t e \ c a d c 3 d \ e n g i n e e r i n g \ 9 3 2 7 _ u t i l i t y . d w g Sa v e D a t e : 10 / 3 1 / 2 4 of 8 REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: ISSUE DATE:07/01/24 Name: Signature: Date:07/01/24 License #: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota 1. 07/17/24 Per City Comments TR I D E N T D E V E L O P M E N T , L L C 12 0 0 2 5 T H A V E N U E S ST . C L O U D , M N 5 6 3 0 1 NO R T H H E I G H T S A D D I T I O N Ar d e n H i l l s , M i n n e s o t a Dan J. Wilke, P.E. DJW DJW 53182 2. 10/01/24 Submitted for CUP 3. 10/08/24 Per City Comments 4. 10/11/24 Per City Comments 5. 10/16/24 SE Parking Lot Removed 6. 11/01/24 Per City Comments 7. 11/15/24 Per City Comments Know what's below. before you dig.Call R C5.2 UT I L I T Y P L A N ST O R M S E W E R f: \ j o b s \ 9 3 2 1 - 9 3 4 0 \ 9 3 2 7 - n o r t h h e i g h t s c h u r c h s i t e \ c a d c 3 d \ e n g i n e e r i n g \ 9 3 2 7 _ u t i l i t y . d w g Sa v e D a t e : 10 / 3 1 / 2 4 of 8 REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: ISSUE DATE:07/01/24 Name: Signature: Date:07/01/24 License #: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota 1. 07/17/24 Per City Comments TR I D E N T D E V E L O P M E N T , L L C 12 0 0 2 5 T H A V E N U E S ST . C L O U D , M N 5 6 3 0 1 NO R T H H E I G H T S A D D I T I O N Ar d e n H i l l s , M i n n e s o t a Dan J. Wilke, P.E. DJW DJW 53182 2. 10/01/24 Submitted for CUP 3. 10/08/24 Per City Comments 4. 10/11/24 Per City Comments 5. 10/16/24 SE Parking Lot Removed 6. 11/01/24 Per City Comments 7. 11/15/24 Per City Comments Know what's below. before you dig.Call R C5.3 UT I L I T Y P L A N ST O R M S E W E R f: \ j o b s \ 9 3 2 1 - 9 3 4 0 \ 9 3 2 7 - n o r t h h e i g h t s c h u r c h s i t e \ c a d c 3 d \ e n g i n e e r i n g \ 9 3 2 7 _ u t i l i t y . d w g Sa v e D a t e : 10 / 3 1 / 2 4 of 8 REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: ISSUE DATE:07/01/24 Name: Signature: Date:07/01/24 License #: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota 1. 07/17/24 Per City Comments TR I D E N T D E V E L O P M E N T , L L C 12 0 0 2 5 T H A V E N U E S ST . C L O U D , M N 5 6 3 0 1 NO R T H H E I G H T S A D D I T I O N Ar d e n H i l l s , M i n n e s o t a Dan J. Wilke, P.E. DJW DJW 53182 2. 10/01/24 Submitted for CUP 3. 10/08/24 Per City Comments 4. 10/11/24 Per City Comments 5. 10/16/24 SE Parking Lot Removed 6. 11/01/24 Per City Comments 7. 11/15/24 Per City Comments GR A D I N G , D R A I N A G E , & ER O S I O N C O N T R O L P L A N C6Know what's below. before you dig.Call R f: \ j o b s \ 9 3 2 1 - 9 3 4 0 \ 9 3 2 7 - n o r t h h e i g h t s c h u r c h s i t e \ c a d c 3 d \ e n g i n e e r i n g \ 9 3 2 7 _ g r a d e . d w g Sa v e D a t e : 10 / 3 1 / 2 4 of 8 REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: ISSUE DATE:07/01/24 Name: Signature: Date:07/01/24 License #: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota 1. 07/17/24 Per City Comments TR I D E N T D E V E L O P M E N T , L L C 12 0 0 2 5 T H A V E N U E S ST . C L O U D , M N 5 6 3 0 1 NO R T H H E I G H T S A D D I T I O N Ar d e n H i l l s , M i n n e s o t a Dan J. Wilke, P.E. DJW DJW 53182 2. 10/01/24 Submitted for CUP 3. 10/08/24 Per City Comments 4. 10/11/24 Per City Comments 5. 10/16/24 SE Parking Lot Removed 6. 11/01/24 Per City Comments 7. 11/15/24 Per City Comments GR A D I N G , D R A I N A G E , & ER O S I O N C O N T R O L P L A N C6.1Know what's below. before you dig.Call R f: \ j o b s \ 9 3 2 1 - 9 3 4 0 \ 9 3 2 7 - n o r t h h e i g h t s c h u r c h s i t e \ c a d c 3 d \ e n g i n e e r i n g \ 9 3 2 7 _ g r a d e . d w g Sa v e D a t e : 10 / 3 1 / 2 4 of 8 REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: ISSUE DATE:07/01/24 Name: Signature: Date:07/01/24 License #: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota 1. 07/17/24 Per City Comments TR I D E N T D E V E L O P M E N T , L L C 12 0 0 2 5 T H A V E N U E S ST . C L O U D , M N 5 6 3 0 1 NO R T H H E I G H T S A D D I T I O N Ar d e n H i l l s , M i n n e s o t a Dan J. Wilke, P.E. DJW DJW 53182 2. 10/01/24 Submitted for CUP 3. 10/08/24 Per City Comments 4. 10/11/24 Per City Comments 5. 10/16/24 SE Parking Lot Removed 6. 11/01/24 Per City Comments 7. 11/15/24 Per City Comments GR A D I N G , D R A I N A G E , & ER O S I O N C O N T R O L P L A N C6.2Know what's below. before you dig.Call R f: \ j o b s \ 9 3 2 1 - 9 3 4 0 \ 9 3 2 7 - n o r t h h e i g h t s c h u r c h s i t e \ c a d c 3 d \ e n g i n e e r i n g \ 9 3 2 7 _ g r a d e . d w g Sa v e D a t e : 10 / 3 1 / 2 4 of 8 REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: ISSUE DATE:07/01/24 Name: Signature: Date:07/01/24 License #: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota 1. 07/17/24 Per City Comments TR I D E N T D E V E L O P M E N T , L L C 12 0 0 2 5 T H A V E N U E S ST . C L O U D , M N 5 6 3 0 1 NO R T H H E I G H T S A D D I T I O N Ar d e n H i l l s , M i n n e s o t a Dan J. Wilke, P.E. DJW DJW 53182 2. 10/01/24 Submitted for CUP 3. 10/08/24 Per City Comments 4. 10/11/24 Per City Comments 5. 10/16/24 SE Parking Lot Removed 6. 11/01/24 Per City Comments 7. 11/15/24 Per City Comments C7 ST O R M W A T E R P O L L U T I O N PR E V E N T I O N P L A N Know what's below. before you dig.Call R f: \ j o b s \ 9 3 2 1 - 9 3 4 0 \ 9 3 2 7 - n o r t h h e i g h t s c h u r c h s i t e \ c a d c 3 d \ e n g i n e e r i n g \ 9 3 2 7 _ s w p p p . d w g Sa v e D a t e : 10 / 3 1 / 2 4 of 8 REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: ISSUE DATE:07/01/24 Name: Signature: Date:07/01/24 License #: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota 1. 07/17/24 Per City Comments TR I D E N T D E V E L O P M E N T , L L C 12 0 0 2 5 T H A V E N U E S ST . C L O U D , M N 5 6 3 0 1 NO R T H H E I G H T S A D D I T I O N Ar d e n H i l l s , M i n n e s o t a Dan J. Wilke, P.E. DJW DJW 53182 2. 10/01/24 Submitted for CUP 3. 10/08/24 Per City Comments 4. 10/11/24 Per City Comments 5. 10/16/24 SE Parking Lot Removed 6. 11/01/24 Per City Comments 7. 11/15/24 Per City Comments SITE C7.1 ST O R M W A T E R P O L L U T I O N PR E V E N T I O N P L A N ” f: \ j o b s \ 9 3 2 1 - 9 3 4 0 \ 9 3 2 7 - n o r t h h e i g h t s c h u r c h s i t e \ c a d c 3 d \ e n g i n e e r i n g \ 9 3 2 7 _ s w p p p . d w g Sa v e D a t e : 10 / 3 1 / 2 4 of 8 REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: ISSUE DATE:07/01/24 Name: Signature: Date:07/01/24 License #: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota 1. 07/17/24 Per City Comments TR I D E N T D E V E L O P M E N T , L L C 12 0 0 2 5 T H A V E N U E S ST . C L O U D , M N 5 6 3 0 1 NO R T H H E I G H T S A D D I T I O N Ar d e n H i l l s , M i n n e s o t a Dan J. Wilke, P.E. DJW DJW 53182 2. 10/01/24 Submitted for CUP 3. 10/08/24 Per City Comments 4. 10/11/24 Per City Comments 5. 10/16/24 SE Parking Lot Removed 6. 11/01/24 Per City Comments 7. 11/15/24 Per City Comments DE T A I L S C8 NO PARKING PARKING VEHICLE I D REQUIRED UP TO $200 FINE FOR VIOLATION VAN ACCESSIBLE f: \ j o b s \ 9 3 2 1 - 9 3 4 0 \ 9 3 2 7 - n o r t h h e i g h t s c h u r c h s i t e \ c a d c 3 d \ e n g i n e e r i n g \ 9 3 2 7 _ d e t a i l . d w g Sa v e D a t e : 11 / 1 3 / 2 4 of 8 REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: ISSUE DATE:07/01/24 Name: Signature: Date:07/01/24 License #: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota 1. 07/17/24 Per City Comments TR I D E N T D E V E L O P M E N T , L L C 12 0 0 2 5 T H A V E N U E S ST . C L O U D , M N 5 6 3 0 1 NO R T H H E I G H T S A D D I T I O N Ar d e n H i l l s , M i n n e s o t a Dan J. Wilke, P.E. DJW DJW 53182 2. 10/01/24 Submitted for CUP 3. 10/08/24 Per City Comments 4. 10/11/24 Per City Comments 5. 10/16/24 SE Parking Lot Removed 6. 11/01/24 Per City Comments 7. 11/15/24 Per City Comments DE T A I L S C8.1 f: \ j o b s \ 9 3 2 1 - 9 3 4 0 \ 9 3 2 7 - n o r t h h e i g h t s c h u r c h s i t e \ c a d c 3 d \ e n g i n e e r i n g \ 9 3 2 7 _ d e t a i l . d w g Sa v e D a t e : 11 / 1 3 / 2 4 of 8 REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: ISSUE DATE:07/01/24 Name: Signature: Date:07/01/24 License #: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota 1. 07/17/24 Per City Comments TR I D E N T D E V E L O P M E N T , L L C 12 0 0 2 5 T H A V E N U E S ST . C L O U D , M N 5 6 3 0 1 NO R T H H E I G H T S A D D I T I O N Ar d e n H i l l s , M i n n e s o t a Dan J. Wilke, P.E. DJW DJW 53182 2. 10/01/24 Submitted for CUP 3. 10/08/24 Per City Comments 4. 10/11/24 Per City Comments 5. 10/16/24 SE Parking Lot Removed 6. 11/01/24 Per City Comments 7. 11/15/24 Per City Comments DE T A I L S C8.2 f: \ j o b s \ 9 3 2 1 - 9 3 4 0 \ 9 3 2 7 - n o r t h h e i g h t s c h u r c h s i t e \ c a d c 3 d \ e n g i n e e r i n g \ 9 3 2 7 _ d e t a i l . d w g Sa v e D a t e : 11 / 1 3 / 2 4 of 8 REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: ISSUE DATE:07/01/24 Name: Signature: Date:07/01/24 License #: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota 1. 07/17/24 Per City Comments TR I D E N T D E V E L O P M E N T , L L C 12 0 0 2 5 T H A V E N U E S ST . C L O U D , M N 5 6 3 0 1 NO R T H H E I G H T S A D D I T I O N Ar d e n H i l l s , M i n n e s o t a Dan J. Wilke, P.E. DJW DJW 53182 2. 10/01/24 Submitted for CUP 3. 10/08/24 Per City Comments 4. 10/11/24 Per City Comments 5. 10/16/24 SE Parking Lot Removed 6. 11/01/24 Per City Comments 7. 11/15/24 Per City Comments DE T A I L S C8.3 f: \ j o b s \ 9 3 2 1 - 9 3 4 0 \ 9 3 2 7 - n o r t h h e i g h t s c h u r c h s i t e \ c a d c 3 d \ e n g i n e e r i n g \ 9 3 2 7 _ d e t a i l . d w g Sa v e D a t e : 11 / 1 3 / 2 4 of 8 REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: ISSUE DATE:07/01/24 Name: Signature: Date:07/01/24 License #: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota 1. 07/17/24 Per City Comments TR I D E N T D E V E L O P M E N T , L L C 12 0 0 2 5 T H A V E N U E S ST . C L O U D , M N 5 6 3 0 1 NO R T H H E I G H T S A D D I T I O N Ar d e n H i l l s , M i n n e s o t a Dan J. Wilke, P.E. DJW DJW 53182 2. 10/01/24 Submitted for CUP 3. 10/08/24 Per City Comments 4. 10/11/24 Per City Comments 5. 10/16/24 SE Parking Lot Removed 6. 11/01/24 Per City Comments 7. 11/15/24 Per City Comments DE T A I L S C8.4 f: \ j o b s \ 9 3 2 1 - 9 3 4 0 \ 9 3 2 7 - n o r t h h e i g h t s c h u r c h s i t e \ c a d c 3 d \ e n g i n e e r i n g \ 9 3 2 7 _ d e t a i l . d w g Sa v e D a t e : 11 / 1 3 / 2 4 of 8 REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: ISSUE DATE:07/01/24 Name: Signature: Date:07/01/24 License #: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota 1. 07/17/24 Per City Comments TR I D E N T D E V E L O P M E N T , L L C 12 0 0 2 5 T H A V E N U E S ST . C L O U D , M N 5 6 3 0 1 NO R T H H E I G H T S A D D I T I O N Ar d e n H i l l s , M i n n e s o t a Dan J. Wilke, P.E. DJW DJW 53182 2. 10/01/24 Submitted for CUP 3. 10/08/24 Per City Comments 4. 10/11/24 Per City Comments 5. 10/16/24 SE Parking Lot Removed 6. 11/01/24 Per City Comments 7. 11/15/24 Per City Comments DE T A I L S C8.5 f: \ j o b s \ 9 3 2 1 - 9 3 4 0 \ 9 3 2 7 - n o r t h h e i g h t s c h u r c h s i t e \ c a d c 3 d \ e n g i n e e r i n g \ 9 3 2 7 _ d e t a i l . d w g Sa v e D a t e : 11 / 1 3 / 2 4 of 8 REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: ISSUE DATE:07/01/24 Name: Signature: Date:07/01/24 License #: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota 1. 07/17/24 Per City Comments TR I D E N T D E V E L O P M E N T , L L C 12 0 0 2 5 T H A V E N U E S ST . C L O U D , M N 5 6 3 0 1 NO R T H H E I G H T S A D D I T I O N Ar d e n H i l l s , M i n n e s o t a Dan J. Wilke, P.E. DJW DJW 53182 2. 10/01/24 Submitted for CUP 3. 10/08/24 Per City Comments 4. 10/11/24 Per City Comments 5. 10/16/24 SE Parking Lot Removed 6. 11/01/24 Per City Comments 7. 11/15/24 Per City Comments 3 WO 3 RP 3 JL 4 RM 3 CA 8 KC 13 AE 2 KC 9 WO 9 BH 2 BF 2 RM 3 FM4 CA 8 JL 6 BF 5 BL 4 HB 6 BL 2 RM 5 RB 10 HL 9 RP 5 BF 26 BH 10 RB 8 FM 10 WP 3 WO 8 WP 8 SB Know what's below. before you dig.Call R f: \ j o b s \ 9 3 2 1 - 9 3 4 0 \ 9 3 2 7 - n o r t h h e i g h t s c h u r c h s i t e \ c a d c 3 d \ l a n d s c a p e \ 9 3 2 7 _ l a n d s c a p e . d w g Sa v e D a t e : 11 / 1 2 / 2 4 of REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: ISSUE DATE:07/01/24 Name: Signature: Date:07/01/24 License #: 1. 07/17/24 Per City Comments Ryan J. Ruttger, RLA 56346 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. RJR RJR 5 TR I D E N T D E V E L O P M E N T , L L C 12 0 0 2 5 T H A V E N U E S ST . C L O U D , M N 5 6 3 0 1 NO R T H H E I G H T S A D D I T I O N Ar d e n H i l l s , M i n n e s o t a 2. 10/01/24 Submitted for CUP 3. 10/08/24 Per City Comments 4. 10/11/24 Per City Comments 5. 10/16/24 SE Parking Lot Removed 6. 11/01/24 Per City Comments 7. 11/15/24 Per City Comments L1 LA N D S C A P E P L A N 4 MKL 5 LBS 5 BCB 6 JSG 5 RTD 7 BCB 3 SPG 4 DBH 5 LBS 7 DLS 2 LRS 3 PDS 5 MKL 2 CWH 6 ARB 7 ABH 9 LBS 9 KFG 3 JSG 9 DBH 5 ABH 4 CWH 7 YEW 3 APC 3 ABH 3 RTD 2 ARB 3 APC 6 ABH 3 KFG f: \ j o b s \ 9 3 2 1 - 9 3 4 0 \ 9 3 2 7 - n o r t h h e i g h t s c h u r c h s i t e \ c a d c 3 d \ l a n d s c a p e \ 9 3 2 7 _ l a n d s c a p e . d w g Sa v e D a t e : 11 / 1 2 / 2 4 of REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: ISSUE DATE:07/01/24 Name: Signature: Date:07/01/24 License #: 1. 07/17/24 Per City Comments Ryan J. Ruttger, RLA 56346 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. RJR RJR 5 TR I D E N T D E V E L O P M E N T , L L C 12 0 0 2 5 T H A V E N U E S ST . C L O U D , M N 5 6 3 0 1 NO R T H H E I G H T S A D D I T I O N Ar d e n H i l l s , M i n n e s o t a 2. 10/01/24 Submitted for CUP 3. 10/08/24 Per City Comments 4. 10/11/24 Per City Comments 5. 10/16/24 SE Parking Lot Removed 6. 11/01/24 Per City Comments 7. 11/15/24 Per City Comments EXISTING GRADE GUY WIRE WITH WEBBING FLAGGING- ONE PER WIRE PLANTING SOIL MIXTURE (SEE SPEC.) MINIMUM 1/2 WIDTH OF ROOT BALL 4"-6" SHREDDED BARK MULCH UNDISTURBED OR STABILIZED SUBSOIL NOTE: GUY ASSEMBLY OPTIONAL BUT CONTRACTOR ASSUMES FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR MAINTAINING TREE IN A PLUMB POSITION FOR THE DURATION OF THE GUARANTEE PERIOD GUY ASSEMBLY- 16" POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE (40 MIL) 1-1/2" WIDE STRAP (TYP) DOUBLE STRAND 10 GA. WIRE, 2-7" ROLLED STEEL POSTS (MnDOT 3401) @ 180° O.C. (SEE STAKING DIAGRAM) COORDINATE STAKING TO INSURE UNIFORM ORIENTATION OF GUY LINES AND STAKES 2. TRIM OUT DEAD WOOD AND WEAK AND/OR DEFORMED TWIGS. DO NOT CUT A LEADER. DO NOT PAINT CUTS. 4. PLACE PLANT IN PLANTING HOLE WITH BURLAP AND WIRE BASKET, (IF USED), INTACT. BACKFILL WITHIN APPROXIMATELY 12" OF THE TOP OF ROOTBALL, WATER PLANT. REMOVE TOP 1/3 OF THE BASKET OR THE TOP TWO HORIZONTAL RINGS, WHICHEVER IS GREATER. REMOVE ALL BURLAP AND NAILS FROM TOP 1/3 OF THE BALL. REMOVE ALL TWINE. 3. SET PLANT ON UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL OR THOROUGHLY COMPACTED BACKFILL SOIL. INSTALL PLANT SO THE ROOT FLARE IS AT OR UP TO 2" ABOVE THE FINISHED GRADE. 6. WATER TO SETTLE PLANTS AND FILL VOIDS. 5. PLUMB AND BACKFILL WITH BACKFILL SOIL. 7. WATER WITHIN TWO HOURS OF INSTALLATION. WATERING MUST BE SUFFICIENT TO THOROUGHLY SATURATE ROOT BALL AND PLANTING HOLE. 8. PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE SECOND WATERING UNLESS SOIL MOISTURE IS EXCESSIVE. 1. SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING PLAN TREE WRAP BACKFILL MIX PAINTED FLUORESCENT ORANGE WHITE FLAGGING (TYP.) DOUBLE STRAND 12 GAUGE WIRE 8" 2-PLY NYLON STRAPS 8' STEEL TEE POST- 4 INCHES HARDWOOD MULCH FROM TOP 1/3 OF THE BALL REMOVE BURLAP & ROPE UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL 4 INCH DEEP SAUCER NOTE: SEE PLANTING NOTES FOR THE TYPE OF MULCH MATERIAL TO USE. 12" 6" 2' ( M I N . ) 6" 6"3 REQUIRED AT 120 2' ( M I N . ) 6"12" UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL ( SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES FOR TYPE OF MULCH ) REMOVE BURLAP & ROPE FROM TOP 1/3 OF BALL IF SHRUB IS B & B, THEN BACKFILL MIX 4 INCHES MULCH L2 LA N D S C A P E P L A N 8 YEW 5 ABH 2 CWH 1 ARB 7 RTD 2 CWH 5 ABH 3 APC 2 CWH 6 MKL 1 JSG 1 CWH 4 DBH 3 KFG 5 SPG 3 JSG 11 SSC 12 LRS 16 DLB 10 WLC 1 JSG 5 KFG 5 SPG 10 PDS 2 YEW 5 ABH 3 NBS 2 VBC 2 LRS 3 PDS 9 DLS 8 DBH 3 CWH 6 JSG 5 VBC 3 NBS 4 APC 9 PDS 4 APC 3 VBC 12 DBH 6 ABH 1 ARB 3 CWH 7 YEW 4 JSG 1 VBC 3 MKL 3 R T D 5 S P G 1 ARB f: \ j o b s \ 9 3 2 1 - 9 3 4 0 \ 9 3 2 7 - n o r t h h e i g h t s c h u r c h s i t e \ c a d c 3 d \ l a n d s c a p e \ 9 3 2 7 _ l a n d s c a p e . d w g Sa v e D a t e : 11 / 1 2 / 2 4 of REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: ISSUE DATE:07/01/24 Name: Signature: Date:07/01/24 License #: 1. 07/17/24 Per City Comments Ryan J. Ruttger, RLA 56346 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. RJR RJR 5 TR I D E N T D E V E L O P M E N T , L L C 12 0 0 2 5 T H A V E N U E S ST . C L O U D , M N 5 6 3 0 1 NO R T H H E I G H T S A D D I T I O N Ar d e n H i l l s , M i n n e s o t a 2. 10/01/24 Submitted for CUP 3. 10/08/24 Per City Comments 4. 10/11/24 Per City Comments 5. 10/16/24 SE Parking Lot Removed 6. 11/01/24 Per City Comments 7. 11/15/24 Per City Comments L3 LA N D S C A P E P L A N 3 RTD 11 JSG 5 MKL 7 VBC 3 RTD 3 BCB 5 RTD 3 MKL 2 RTD 5 BCB 2 ARB 9 NBS 4 CWH 10 PDS 4 MKL 3 PDS 2 LRS 10 DLS 3 SPG 4 DBH 5 LBS 3 JSG 5 JSG 9 BCB 5 LBS 5 RTD 9 BCB 5 LBS 4 MKL 3 KFG 5 SPG 12 DBH 1 CWH 5 KFG 6 LRS 6 JSG 14 SSC 7 KFG 20 DLB 16 WLC 5 SPG 3 WLC 6 LRS 1 JSG 18 WLC 5 KFG 6 DBH 8 LRS 3 WLC 4 CA 6 KFG 4 DBH f: \ j o b s \ 9 3 2 1 - 9 3 4 0 \ 9 3 2 7 - n o r t h h e i g h t s c h u r c h s i t e \ c a d c 3 d \ l a n d s c a p e \ 9 3 2 7 _ l a n d s c a p e . d w g Sa v e D a t e : 11 / 1 2 / 2 4 of REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: ISSUE DATE:07/01/24 Name: Signature: Date:07/01/24 License #: 1. 07/17/24 Per City Comments Ryan J. Ruttger, RLA 56346 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. RJR RJR 5 TR I D E N T D E V E L O P M E N T , L L C 12 0 0 2 5 T H A V E N U E S ST . C L O U D , M N 5 6 3 0 1 NO R T H H E I G H T S A D D I T I O N Ar d e n H i l l s , M i n n e s o t a 2. 10/01/24 Submitted for CUP 3. 10/08/24 Per City Comments 4. 10/11/24 Per City Comments 5. 10/16/24 SE Parking Lot Removed 6. 11/01/24 Per City Comments 7. 11/15/24 Per City Comments L4 LA N D S C A P E P L A N SYMBOL CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER TREES RM 8 Acer rubrum `Northwood`Northwoods Red Maple 4" Cal.B&B FM 11 Acer x freemanii `Sienna`Sienna Glen Maple 4" Cal.B&B RB 15 Betula nigra Clump Form, 4" Cal Equivalent River Birch Multi-Trunk 12` Ht.B&B HB 4 Celtis occidentalis Common Hackberry 4" Cal.B&B HL 10 Gleditsia triacanthos inermis `Harve`Northern Acclaim Thornless Honey Locust 4" Cal.B&B KC 10 Gymnocladus dioica `Espresso`Kentucky Coffeetree 4" Cal.B&B WO 15 Quercus bicolor Swamp White Oak 4" Cal.B&B BL 11 Tilia americana `Boulevard`Boulevard Linden 4" Cal.B&B AE 13 Ulmus americana `Princeton`American Elm 4" Cal.B&B CONIFEROUS TREES BF 13 Abies balsamea 4" Cal Equivalent Balsam Fir 10` Ht.B&B BH 35 Picea glauca densata 4" Cal Equivalent Black Hills Spruce 10` Ht.B&B RP 12 Pinus resinosa 4" Cal Equivalent Red Pine 10` Ht.B&B WP 18 Pinus strobus 4" Cal Equivalent White Pine 10` Ht.B&B AR 13 Thuja occidentalis `Techny` 4" Cal Equivalent Techny Arborvitae 10` Ht.B&B ORNAMENTAL TREES SB 8 Amelanchier x grandiflora `Autumn Brilliance` Clump Form, 2" Cal Equivalent Autumn Brilliance Serviceberry 8` Ht.B&B CA 7 Malus x `Prairifire` Red Flowers Prairifire Crabapple 2" Cal.B&B JL 11 Syringa reticulata `Ivory Silk` White Flowers Ivory Silk Japanese Tree Lilac 2" Cal.B&B PLANT SCHEDULE SHRUBS BCB 38 Aronia melanocarpa `Autumn Magic`Autumn Magic Black Chokeberry #5 Cont. SSC 25 Clethra alnifolia `Hummingbird`Summersweet #5 Cont. RTD 33 Cornus sericea `Alleman`s Compact`Dwarf Red Twig Dogwood #5 Cont. DBH 75 Diervilla lonicera Dwarf Bush Honeysuckle #5 Cont. CWH 24 Hamamelis virginiana Common Witch Hazel #5 Cont. ABH 42 Hydrangea arborescens `Annabelle`Annabelle Hydrangea #5 Cont. NBS 15 Physocarpus opulifolius `Seward` TM Summer Wine Seward Ninebark #5 Cont. APC 17 Ribes alpinum Alpine Currant #5 Cont. SPG 26 Spiraea x bumalda `Goldflame` Gold Foliage, Red Flowers Goldflame Spirea #5 Cont. MKL 30 Syringa patula `Miss Kim`Miss Kim Lilac #5 Cont. VBC 18 Viburnum trilobum `Bailey Compact` Red Fall Color Bailey`s Compact American Cranberry Bush #5 Cont. EVERGREEN SHRUBS JSG 50 Juniperus chinensis `Sea Green`Sea Green Juniper #5 Cont. YEW 24 Taxus x media `Tauntonii`Tauton Yew #5 Cont. GRASSES KFG 64 Calamagrostis x acutiflora `Karl Foerster`Feather Reed Grass #2 Cont. LBS 34 Schizachyrium scoparium Little Bluestem #2 Cont. PDS 38 Sporobolus heterolepis Prairie Dropseed #2 Cont. PERENNIALS DLB 36 Hemerocallis x `Baja` Red Flowers Baja Daylily #1 Cont. DLS 26 Hemerocallis x `Stella De Oro` Yellow / Gold Flowers Stella De Oro Daylily #1 Cont. WLC 50 Nepeta x faassenii `Walkers Low`Walkers Low Catmint #1 Cont. LRS 38 Perovskia atriplicifolia `Little Spire`Little Spire Russian Sage #1 Cont. GROUND COVERS ROCK 21,516 sf 1.5" Rock Mulch Non-Woven Geotextile Incidental River Rock - Match Existing Church 4" Depth SOD 98,594 sf Turf Sod Bluegrass Kentucky Bluegrass sod TI 75,857 sf Type I - Stormwater Seed Mix Refer to notes for acceptable seeding methods Seeding Rate 52.0 lb/ac MnDOT Seed Mix 33-261 seed SYMBOL CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER f: \ j o b s \ 9 3 2 1 - 9 3 4 0 \ 9 3 2 7 - n o r t h h e i g h t s c h u r c h s i t e \ c a d c 3 d \ l a n d s c a p e \ 9 3 2 7 _ l a n d s c a p e . d w g Sa v e D a t e : 11 / 1 2 / 2 4 of REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: ISSUE DATE:07/01/24 Name: Signature: Date:07/01/24 License #: 1. 07/17/24 Per City Comments Ryan J. Ruttger, RLA 56346 I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. RJR RJR 5 TR I D E N T D E V E L O P M E N T , L L C 12 0 0 2 5 T H A V E N U E S ST . C L O U D , M N 5 6 3 0 1 NO R T H H E I G H T S A D D I T I O N Ar d e n H i l l s , M i n n e s o t a 2. 10/01/24 Submitted for CUP 3. 10/08/24 Per City Comments 4. 10/11/24 Per City Comments 5. 10/16/24 SE Parking Lot Removed 6. 11/01/24 Per City Comments 7. 11/15/24 Per City Comments L5 LA N D S C A P E P L A N ARDEN HEIGHTS ADDITION ENGINEERINGSURVEYINGENVIRONMENTAL – Attachment E ARDEN HEIGHTS ADDITION ENGINEERINGSURVEYINGENVIRONMENTAL E X C E P T I O N E X C E P T I O N UNI T E D S T A T E S H I G H W A Y N O . 1 0 A N D 6 2 SNELLING AVENUE C. S . A . H . N O . 9 6 OLD HIGH W A Y 1 0 VICINITY MAP f: \ j o b s \ 9 3 2 1 - 9 3 4 0 \ 9 3 2 7 - n o r t h h e i g h t s c h u r c h s i t e \ c a d c 3 d \ s u r v e y \ d e s c r i p t i o n s k e t c h e s \ 9 3 2 7 _ v a c a t i o n d o c n o . 2 2 7 8 8 5 2 . d w g Sa v e D a t e : 10 / 2 9 / 2 4 Easement Vacation Description Sketch $WWDFKPHQW) Pl a t i n u m 5 5 + L i v i n g C o m p l e x 11 - 1 4 - 2 0 2 4 1 Tr i d e n t D e v e l o p m e n t Site Plan Scale: 1" = 100'-0" NORTH TRAIL FI R E L A N E PATIO UPPER DECK MAIN ENTRY RA M P D N S T A T E H I G H W A Y 1 0 COUNTY HIGHWAY 96 W EXISTING CHURCH STORM WATER CHURCH PARKING CHURCH PARKING AP A R T M E N T P A R K I N G 10 5 S T A L L S S U R F A C E P A R K I NG Attachment G Pl a t i n u m 5 5 + L i v i n g C o m p l e x 11 - 1 4 - 2 0 2 4 2 Tr i d e n t D e v e l o p m e n t Parking Level Scale: 1" = 50'-0" LEVEL PARKING STALLS = 150 RAMP DOWN TO PARKING STAIR STAIR STAIRELEV. ELEV. MAINT.TRASH NORTH Arden Hills Unit Mix Matrix and Parking Ratios Floor Type 1st 2nd 3rd Total Perct. Goal 1 bed 5 5 5 15 13% 15% 1 Bed Large 8 10 10 28 24% 25% 2 Bed 18 19 17 54 45% 40% 2 Bed Den 6 8 8 22 18% 20% 37 42 40 119 100% 100% Parking Lower total 150 150 1.260504 stalls/unit Approx. Surface 105 Approx. total 255 2.142857 stalls/unit Approx. total 255 2.142857 stalls/unit Approx. 27 29 5 34 16 18 21 MECH. MECH. DOG WASH MECH. MECH. BICYCLE RACK INFORMATION 36 bicycle parking 18 bicycle parking 18 bicycle parking 105 255 255 2.142857 2.142857 BICYCLE PARKING SPACE CALCULATIONS: 119 UNITS X 0.5 / UNIT = 59.5 OR 60 SPACE REQUIRED 72 SPACES PROVIDED Ar d e n H i l l s 5 5 + L i v i n g C o m p l e x 1. 3 1 . 2 0 2 2 3 Tr i d e n t D e v e l o p m e n t First Level Floor Plan Scale: 1" = 50'-0" DINING / KIT COMMUNITY LOBBY FIT OFF S/M/E S/M/E NORTH MAIN ENTRY STAIR STAIR STAIR Arden Hills Unit Mix Matrix and Parking Ratios Floor Type 1st 2nd 3rd Total Perct.Goal 1 bed 5 5 5 15 13%15% 1 Bed Large 8 10 10 28 24%25% 2 Bed 18 19 17 54 45%40% 2 Bed Den 6 8 8 22 18%20% 37 42 40 119 100%100% Parking Lower total 150 150 1.260504 stalls/unit Approx. Surface 105 Approx. total 255 2.142857 stalls/unit Approx. total 255 2.142857 stalls/unit Approx. TRASH Pl a t i n u m 5 5 + L i v i n g C o m p l e x 9. 3 0 - 2 0 2 4 Platinum 55+ 104 254 254 2.134454 2.134454 11 - 1 4 - 2 0 2 4 Arden Hills Unit Mix Matrix and Parking Ratios Floor Type 1st 2nd 3rd Total Perct. Goal 1 bed 5 5 5 15 13% 15% 1 Bed Large 8 10 10 28 24% 25% 2 Bed 18 19 17 54 45% 40% 2 Bed Den 6 8 8 22 18% 20% 37 42 40 119 100% 100% Parking Lower total 150 150 1.260504 stalls/unit Approx. Surface 105 Approx. total 255 2.142857 stalls/unit Approx. total 255 2.142857 stalls/unit Approx. 105 255 255 2.142857 2.142857 Ar d e n H i l l s 5 5 + L i v i n g C o m p l e x 1. 3 1 . 2 0 2 2 4 Tr i d e n t D e v e l o p m e n t Second Level Floor Plan Scale: 1" = 50'-0" UPPER LOBBY S/M/E S/M/E NORTH Arden Hills Unit Mix Matrix and Parking Ratios Floor Type 1st 2nd 3rd Total Perct.Goal 1 bed 5 5 5 15 13%15% 1 Bed Large 8 10 10 28 24%25% 2 Bed 18 19 17 54 45%40% 2 Bed Den 6 8 8 22 18%20% 37 42 40 119 100%100% Parking Lower total 150 150 1.260504 stalls/unit Approx. Surface 105 Approx. total 255 2.142857 stalls/unit Approx. total 255 2.142857 stalls/unit Approx. elev. elev. m/e Pl a t i n u m 5 5 + L i v i n g C o m p l e x 9. 3 0 - 2 0 2 4 TRASH Platinum 55+ 104 254 254 2.134454 2.134454 11 - 1 4 - 2 0 2 4 Arden Hills Unit Mix Matrix and Parking Ratios Floor Type 1st 2nd 3rd Total Perct. Goal 1 bed 5 5 5 15 13% 15% 1 Bed Large 8 10 10 28 24% 25% 2 Bed 18 19 17 54 45% 40% 2 Bed Den 6 8 8 22 18% 20% 37 42 40 119 100% 100% Parking Lower total 150 150 1.260504 stalls/unit Approx. Surface 105 Approx. total 255 2.142857 stalls/unit Approx. total 255 2.142857 stalls/unit Approx. 105 255 255 2.142857 2.142857 Ar d e n H i l l s 5 5 + L i v i n g C o m p l e x 1. 3 1 . 2 0 2 2 5 Tr i d e n t D e v e l o p m e n t Third Level Floor Plan Scale: 1" = 50'-0" possible deck rec area S/M/E S/M/E NORTH ROOF TOP DECK GAME Arden Hills Unit Mix Matrix and Parking Ratios Floor Type 1st 2nd 3rd Total Perct.Goal 1 bed 5 5 5 15 13%15% 1 Bed Large 8 10 10 28 24%25% 2 Bed 18 19 17 54 45%40% 2 Bed Den 6 8 8 22 18%20% 37 42 40 119 100%100% Parking Lower total 150 150 1.260504 stalls/unit Approx. Surface 105 Approx. total 255 2.142857 stalls/unit Approx. total 255 2.142857 stalls/unit Approx. elev. elev. m/e TRASH Pl a t i n u m 5 5 + L i v i n g C o m p l e x 9. 3 0 - 2 0 2 4 Platinum 55+ 104 254 254 2.134454 2.134454 11 - 1 4 - 2 0 2 4 Arden Hills Unit Mix Matrix and Parking Ratios Floor Type 1st 2nd 3rd Total Perct. Goal 1 bed 5 5 5 15 13% 15% 1 Bed Large 8 10 10 28 24% 25% 2 Bed 18 19 17 54 45% 40% 2 Bed Den 6 8 8 22 18% 20% 37 42 40 119 100% 100% Parking Lower total 150 150 1.260504 stalls/unit Approx. Surface 105 Approx. total 255 2.142857 stalls/unit Approx. total 255 2.142857 stalls/unit Approx. 105 255 255 2.142857 2.142857 Ar d e n H i l l s 5 5 + L i v i n g C o m p l e x 1. 3 1 . 2 0 2 2 6 Tr i d e n t D e v e l o p m e n t Partial South Elevation Partial East Elevation ASPHALT SHINGLES METAL LAP SIDING (ALT FOR BOARD/BATTEN) METAL SHAKES PAINTED METAL DECKS VINYL PATIO DOORS AND WINDOWSS METAL CANOPY ELEMENT WHITE METAL FLASHING AND TRIM STONE VENEER AP P R O X . 44 ' METAL CANOPY ELEMENT Partial East Elevation ASPHALT SHINGLES METAL LAP SIDING (ALT FOR BOARD/BATTEN) METAL SHAKES PAINTED METAL DECKS VINYL PATIO DOORS AND WINDOWSS METAL CANOPY ELEMENT WHITE METAL FLASHING AND TRIM STONE VENEER AP P R O X . 44 ' METAL CANOPY ELEMENT METAL FLASHING AND TRIM METAL ENTRY CANOPY ELEMENT PAINTED METAL BALCONY ASPHALT SHINGLES BRICK VENEER 2 TONE METAL LAP SIDING VERTICAL METAL SIDING VINYL PATIO DOORS AND WINDOWS METAL ENTRY CANOPY ELEMENT AP P R O X . 4 4 ' Pl a t i n u m 5 5 + L i v i n g C o m p l e x 9. 3 0 - 2 0 2 4 11 - 1 4 - 2 0 2 4 Ar d e n H i l l s 5 5 + L i v i n g C o m p l e x 1. 3 1 . 2 0 2 2 7 Tr i d e n t D e v e l o p m e n t Partial South Elevation Partial North Elevation Pl a t i n u m 5 5 + L i v i n g C o m p l e x 9. 3 0 - 2 0 2 4 11 - 1 4 - 2 0 2 4 Ar d e n H i l l s 5 5 + L i v i n g C o m p l e x 1. 3 1 . 2 0 2 2 8 Tr i d e n t D e v e l o p m e n t Pl a t i n u m 5 5 + L i v i n g C o m p l e x 9. 3 0 - 2 0 2 4 11 - 1 4 - 2 0 2 4 Ar d e n H i l l s 5 5 + L i v i n g C o m p l e x 1. 3 1 . 2 0 2 2 9 Tr i d e n t D e v e l o p m e n t Pl a t i n u m 5 5 + L i v i n g C o m p l e x 9. 3 0 - 2 0 2 4 11 - 1 4 - 2 0 2 4 Ar d e n H i l l s 5 5 + L i v i n g C o m p l e x 1. 3 1 . 2 0 2 2 10 Tr i d e n t D e v e l o p m e n t Pl a t i n u m 5 5 + L i v i n g C o m p l e x 9. 3 0 - 2 0 2 4 11 - 1 4 - 2 0 2 4 Ar d e n H i l l s 5 5 + L i v i n g C o m p l e x 1. 3 1 . 2 0 2 2 11 Tr i d e n t D e v e l o p m e n t Pl a t i n u m 5 5 + L i v i n g C o m p l e x 9. 3 0 - 2 0 2 4 11 - 1 4 - 2 0 2 4 Ar d e n H i l l s 5 5 + L i v i n g C o m p l e x 1. 3 1 . 2 0 2 2 12 Tr i d e n t D e v e l o p m e n t Pl a t i n u m 5 5 + L i v i n g C o m p l e x 9. 3 0 - 2 0 2 4 11 - 1 4 - 2 0 2 4 Ar d e n H i l l s 5 5 + L i v i n g C o m p l e x 1. 3 1 . 2 0 2 2 19 Tr i d e n t D e v e l o p m e n t 13 Pl a t i n u m 5 5 + L i v i n g C o m p l e x 9. 3 0 - 2 0 2 4 11 - 1 4 - 2 0 2 4 Ar d e n H i l l s 5 5 + L i v i n g C o m p l e x 1. 3 1 . 2 0 2 2 17 Tr i d e n t D e v e l o p m e n t 14 Pl a t i n u m 5 5 + L i v i n g C o m p l e x 9. 3 0 - 2 0 2 4 11 - 1 4 - 2 0 2 4 Ar d e n H i l l s 5 5 + L i v i n g C o m p l e x 1. 3 1 . 2 0 2 2 15 Tr i d e n t D e v e l o p m e n t Pl a t i n u m 5 5 + L i v i n g C o m p l e x 9. 3 0 - 2 0 2 4 11 - 1 4 - 2 0 2 4 Ar d e n H i l l s 5 5 + L i v i n g C o m p l e x 1. 3 1 . 2 0 2 2 14 Tr i d e n t D e v e l o p m e n t 16 Pl a t i n u m 5 5 + L i v i n g C o m p l e x 9. 3 0 - 2 0 2 4 11 - 1 4 - 2 0 2 4 Ar d e n H i l l s 5 5 + L i v i n g C o m p l e x 1. 3 1 . 2 0 2 2 18 Tr i d e n t D e v e l o p m e n t 17 Pl a t i n u m 5 5 + L i v i n g C o m p l e x 9. 3 0 - 2 0 2 4 11 - 1 4 - 2 0 2 4 Ar d e n H i l l s 5 5 + L i v i n g C o m p l e x 1. 3 1 . 2 0 2 2 18 Tr i d e n t D e v e l o p m e n t 1718 Pl a t i n u m 5 5 + L i v i n g C o m p l e x 9. 3 0 - 2 0 2 4 11 - 1 4 - 2 0 2 4 Ar d e n H i l l s 5 5 + L i v i n g C o m p l e x 1. 3 1 . 2 0 2 2 17 Tr i d e n t D e v e l o p m e n t 14 Pl a t i n u m 5 5 + L i v i n g C o m p l e x 9. 3 0 - 2 0 2 4 19 11 - 1 4 - 2 0 2 4 Co l o r Ex a m p l e s Ma t e r i a l Ex a m p l e $WWDFKPHQW+ PR E L I M I N A R Y S E T 0.1 0.2 1.3 0.4 0.1 2.5 10.5 0.1 1.6 0.1 0.2 2.4 12.3 3.0 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 1.6 4.1 4.7 5.0 4.6 0.1 0.2 0.8 1.7 1.0 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.9 1.0 1.5 4.1 4.9 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.7 1.4 3.7 4.4 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.1 0.9 0.7 0.7 1.2 1.4 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 1.1 1.5 2.0 2.4 2.4 2.0 1.5 1.1 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.9 1.3 1.7 2.0 1.9 1.6 1.3 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.6 1.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.3 2.0 2.9 3.4 3.4 3.0 2.0 1.3 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.7 1.0 1.6 2.4 3.0 3.0 2.6 1.9 1.3 0.9 0.7 0.8 5.0 20.6 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.2 2.0 3.1 3.7 3.8 3.2 2.0 1.2 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.6 1.0 1.6 2.6 3.7 3.9 3.4 2.5 1.6 1.1 0.7 0.6 1.9 3.9 0.8 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 1.0 1.5 2.3 2.9 2.9 2.3 1.5 1.0 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.7 1.3 2.2 3.1 3.6 3.5 2.6 1.7 1.1 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.8 1.2 1.6 1.6 1.2 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.3 2.1 2.5 2.3 1.8 1.3 1.0 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.1 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 1.0 1.5 1.8 1.8 1.4 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.7 1.2 1.9 2.7 2.7 2.3 1.5 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.2 2.2 3.4 3.7 3.1 2.2 1.4 0.9 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.9 2.1 3.2 3.9 3.6 2.6 1.7 1.1 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.6 1.5 2.6 3.1 3.2 2.4 1.7 1.2 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.4 1.9 2.0 1.8 1.4 1.1 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.9 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.7 5.5 0.1 0.7 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.5 1.3 1.0 0.6 0.7 5.3 8.3 17.9 3.0 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 1.0 1.4 1.9 2.3 2.1 1.6 1.0 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.3 3.8 4.6 1.1 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.9 1.5 2.4 3.3 3.0 2.4 1.6 1.0 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.2 1.2 14.8 6.0 1.1 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.5 2.6 3.7 3.8 3.1 2.1 1.3 0.8 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.8 2.3 1.6 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 1.0 2.3 3.3 3.8 3.4 2.3 1.5 1.0 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.1 1.1 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.7 1.4 2.3 2.6 2.6 2.0 1.3 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 1.2 1.5 1.7 1.6 1.4 1.0 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.7 1.0 1.5 1.5 1.3 1.1 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.8 1.1 1.5 2.1 2.4 2.2 1.8 1.3 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.2 1.8 2.4 2.7 2.6 2.0 1.4 1.0 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.8 1.2 1.7 2.3 2.7 2.5 2.1 1.4 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.7 1.0 1.4 2.0 2.2 2.1 1.7 1.2 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 1.0 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.2 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 PR E L I M I N A R Y S E T DRAFT REPORT | www.transportationcollaborative.com | To: Andy Brummer Trident Development From: Matt Pacyna, PE, Principal Transportation Collaborative & Consultants, LLC Date: June 28, 2024 Subject: Trident Arden Hills Apartments Traffic Review INTRODUCTION TC2 was asked to conduct a traffic review of the proposed Trident Arden Hills Apartments development adjacent to the North Heights Church in the City of Arden Hills (see Figure 1). The site is bounded by Highway 10 to the west, County Road 96 (CR 96) to the north, and Snelling Avenue to the east. The site is generally vacant, although a portion of the existing church parking lot would be modified to accommodate the proposed apartments. The objectives of the review are to estimate the trip generation of the proposed development, qualitatively assess any transportation impacts to the adjacent roadway network, and identify potential improvements and/or considerations for the site. The following study background, assumptions, methodology, and findings are offered for consideration. Figure 1 Subject Site Subject Site Sn e l l i n g A v e I-694 Ha m l i n e Av e Round Lake CR 96 Keithson Dr Colleen Ave Attachment J Trident Arden Hills Apartments Traffic Review June 28, 2024 Page 2 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The proposed development is a 124-unit independent living multifamily apartment building designated for residents that are 55 years of age or older. The site is generally vacant, although a portion of the existing church parking lot would be modified to accommodate the proposed apartments. A total of 229 parking spaces are proposed for the apartments (i.e., 105-space surface lot and 124-space garage), which is compliant with City code (i.e., 1.1 space per efficiency and 1 bedroom dwelling units; 2 spaces for each 2+ bedroom dwelling units). The parking areas for the proposed development and church would be separated, but there could be the potential to share parking if needed. Access to the site is provided via the existing church driveway, which provides full access to CR 96; a secondary church driveway provides limited access to Snelling Avenue through a “No Right-Turn” sign restriction for exiting vehicles. The development is assumed to be completed in the year 2026. Trip Generation The trip generation estimate for the proposed development, shown in Table 1, was created using the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition. The proposed development is expected to generate on average 25 a.m. peak hour, 31 p.m. peak hour, and 402 daily trips. Note that the a.m. and p.m. peak hours typically represent 7:30 to 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 to 5:30 p.m. The resultant site generated trips are illustrated in Figure 2, which is based on existing area travel patterns, the proposed site plan, and engineering judgement. Table 1 Trip Generation Summary Land Use Type (ITE Code) Size AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily In Out In Out Senior Multifamily Housing (252) 124-units 8 17 17 14 402 Traffic Impacts CR 96 is a 4-lane divided Minor Arterial roadway with a daily planning level roadway capacity of 28,000 to 32,000 vehicles per day (vpd); the current average daily traffic (ADT) volume along CR 96 is 18,850 vpd. Snelling Avenue is a 2-lane local roadway with a daily planning level roadway capacity of 8,000 to 10,000 vpd; the current ADT volume along Snelling Avenue is 1,100 vpd. Given the excess roadway capacity along both CR 96 and Snelling Avenue and the relatively low trip generation from the proposed development, the overall impact on area roadway capacity is expected to be minimal. In addition, the peak hour trip generation is not expected to significantly change overall intersection operations or warrant any geometric or traffic control changes. Therefore, no significant issues are expected as a result of the proposed development from an intersection / roadway capacity perspective. Note that the CR 96 / North Heights Church access intersection is anticipated to eventually be signalized as part of the Rice Creek Commons Development, formerly known as the TCAAP redevelopment. Site Plan Considerations Based on a cursory review of the proposed site plan, the following items are offered for consideration: 1) Review proposed signage and landscaping to avoid creating any sight distance issues. 2) Confirm truck (i.e., garbage, recycling, delivery, moving, etc.) maneuverability to ensure adequate circulation is provided. Trident Arden Hills Apartments Traffic Review June 28, 2024 Page 3 3) Develop a shared parking agreement with the adjacent church, if needed. a. The reconfigured church parking lot, along with the potential additional parking spaces shown on the latest site plan, would result in a net decrease of approximately 15 parking spaces or about a two (2) percent reduction when compared to existing conditions (i.e., 840 existing spaces versus 825 proposed spaces). Further coordination with the project team, church, and/or City should occur to confirm the appropriate level of parking that should be provided. 4) Ensure a consistent sidewalk connection is provided between the proposed development entryway and the planned trail from the proposed development that would connect to the existing multiuse trail along the south side of CR 96. Figure 1Site Generated Trips Trident Arden Hills Apartments Traffic Review 9 ( 8 ) 8 ( 6 ) 0 (0)3 (7) 0 (0)5 (9) 0 (0) 0 ( 1 ) 0 ( 0 ) 0 ( 0 ) 1 ( 1 ) +150 + 2 5 +225 Legend AM Peak Hour TripsPM Peak Hour TripsAverage Daily TripsStop Sign XXX(XXX)XXX N Directional Distribution 55%45% 5% Colleen Ave Keithson Dr Round Lake H w y 1 0 S n e l l i n g A v e N H w y 1 0 CR 96 CR 96 Arden Hills 55+ Senior Housing Complex Arden Hills, Minnesota TRAFFIC NOISE ASSESSMENT Prepared for Trident Development, LLC Attn: Andy Brumer by David Braslau Associates, Inc. 6603 Queen Avenue S, Suite M Richfield, MN 55423 Tel: 612-331-4571 Eml: david@braslau.com Dr. David Braslau, President 30 September 2024 Attachment K Arden Hills 55+ Senior Housing Complex Traffic Noise Assessment EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Traffic Noise Assessment addresses expected noise levels at the proposed Arden Hills 55+ Senior Housing Complex in Arden Hills, Minnesota, and proposed measures to comply with Minnesota Noise Standards. The project is located between Minnesota Highway 10 (Hwy 10) on the south and Trunk Highway 96 (TH 96) on the north. The purpose of this study is to determine if the project is in compliance with Minnesota state noise standards, or if needed, to meet exceptions to the rules in the Minnesota Noise Standards. Traffic noise levels from Hwy 10 and TH 96 have been predicted for representative second floor receptor sites distributed around the project building for the morning peak hour (6-7 am) and afternoon peak hour (4-5 pm). Daily traffic volumes have been collected from the MnDOT Traffic Mapping Application and directional and hourly traffic volumes have been based on data from Automatic Traffic Recorder 10919 located on Hwy 10 north of the project. Vehicle type percentages have been based on similar studies in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. Under Minnesota noise rule definitions, the hour from 6 -7 AM falls under the nighttime category while the 4-5 PM hour falls under the daytime category. The MinnNoise computer model has been used to estimate nighttime (6-7 AM) and daytime (4-5 PM) sound levels at selected receptors sites distributed around the proposed building. Due to proximity of roadways, the predicted nighttime L10 and L50 levels at all receptor sites are above daytime and nighttime standards for residential land use but can be brought into compliance with state rules if appropriate STC rated windows are installed. Under exceptions to the rules, the STC rating needed for windows and doors with direct exposure to highway noise will depend upon the area percentages of exterior wall components. Depending on glazing area, STC28, STC29 and STC30 windows would be needed to comply with exceptions to the rules. If different glazing types would be difficult, STC30 glazing would be needed throughout. The final section of the study addresses potential increases in traffic noise level for homes to the southwest across TH 10 due to possible reflection from the new building. The latest FHWA traffic noise model (TNM 3.2) is now capable of evaluating traffic noise reflections from structures. While not publicly available, the consulting firm Bowlby Associates offered to perform an analysis. Results of the analysis show increases from zero to well below 1 dBA, that would not be easily detectable. Arden Hills 55+ Senior Housing Complex Traffic Noise Assessment Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 2 1.1. Objectives of this Noise Assessment ............................................................................... 2 1.2. Site Location and Plan ..................................................................................................... 2 1.3. Minnesota Noise Standards ............................................................................................. 2 2.0 TRAFFIC NOISE MONITORING ................................................................................. 6 3.0 TRAFFIC NOISE MODEL AND PREDICTIONS ..................................................... 11 3.1. Traffic Noise Model ...................................................................................................... 11 3.2. Noise Model Predictions ............................................................................................... 13 3.3. Compliance with State Noise Standards ........................................................................ 16 4.0 ANALYSIS OF NEW BUILDING RELECTIONS ON ADJACENT HOMES ........ 19 5.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ........................................................................................... 21 Arden Hills 55+ Senior Housing Complex Traffic Noise Assessment List of Figures Figure 1.1 Project Location between TH 96 and Hwy 10 .................................................... 3 Figure 1.2 Project Layout relative to North Heights Church .............................................. 4 Figure 1.3 Architects Overview Looking East ...................................................................... 5 Figure 2.1 Traffic Noise Monitoring Sites ............................................................................. 7 Figure 2.2 4-5 PM one-second sound Level Time History on Hwy 10- Interrupted Flow 8 Figure 2.3 6-7 AM one second Sound Level Time History on Hwy 10................................ 9 Figure 2.4 Comparison of PM and AM Traffic Noise Levels ............................................ 10 Figure 3.1 Noise Model Receptor Sites – Highest Noise Levels at #9 AND #11 ............... 12 Figure 3.2 Predicted Noise Levels (dBA) with 55 MPH on Hwy 10 .................................. 13 Figure 3.3 Predicted Noise Levels (dBA) with 55 MPH on TH 96 .................................... 14 Figure 3.4 Adjusted Hwy 10 Predictions with 65 MPH ..................................................... 15 Figure 3.5 Predicted AM L10 Levels ................................................................................... 15 Figure 3.6 Exterior Facades Evaluated for Exterior Wall Compliance ............................ 17 Figure 4.1 TNM 3.2 Model Results on Reflections ............................................................. 19 List of Tables Table 1.1 Minnesota State Noise Standards (NAC-1) ......................................................... 2 Table 2.1 Monitored Hourly Statistical Levels .................................................................. 10 Table 3.1 Assumed Hourly Volume and Vehicle Mix ....................................................... 11 Table 3.2 Predicted L10 Noise Levels (dBA) re AM and PM Standards ........................ 16 Table 3.3 Exterior-Interior Façade Evaluations ............................................................... 18 Table 4.1 TNM 3.2 Model Results ...................................................................................... 20 Arden Hills 55+ Senior Housing Complex `Traffic Noise Assessment David Braslau Associates, Inc. Page 2 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1. Objectives of this Noise Assessment This Traffic Noise Assessment evaluates potential traffic noise impacts on the proposed Arden Hills 55+ Senior Housing complex located between U.S. Highway 10 (Hwy 10) to the southwest Minnesota Trunk Highway 96 (TH 96) to the north. The project will be located in the northwest corner of property currently owned by the North Heights Lutheran Church. Hourly traffic volumes on Hwy 10 and TH 96 have been based on traffic count data from the MnDOT Traffic Application website as discussed in Section 2.1 of this report. Projected traffic noise levels are compared with the Minnesota daytime and nighttime noise standards to determine the potential for negative noise impacts and the need for mitigation. 1.2. Site Location and Plan Location of the proposed project is shown on Figure 1.1. The site plan is shown in Figure 1.2. An architect’s view of the project looking to the east is included as Figure 1.3. 1.3. Minnesota Noise Standards The Minnesota State Noise Standards for residential land use are presented in Table 1.1. Residential land uses are included in the NAC-1 (Noise Area Classification -1) under Minnesota Rule 7030.0040. Table 1.1 Minnesota State Noise Standards (NAC-1) Daytime (7:00 am to 10:00 pm) Nighttime (10:00 pm to 7:00 am) L10 65 dBA 55 dBA L50 60 dBA 50 dBA L10 is the level exceeded 10% or 6 minutes of an hour. L50 is the level exceeded 50% or 30 minutes of an hour. The L10 level, which has been shown to accurately reflect traffic noise along major highways, is used in this report to determine compliance. Arden Hills 55+ Senior Housing Complex Traffic Noise Assessment David Braslau Associates, Inc. Page 3 Figure 1.1 Project Location between TH 96 and Hwy 10 Arden Hills 55+ Senior Housing Complex Traffic Noise Assessment David Braslau Associates, Inc. Page 4 Figure 1.2 Project Layout relative to North Heights Church Arden Hills 55+ Senior Housing Complex Traffic Noise Assessment David Braslau Associates, Inc. Page 5 Figure 1.3 Architects Overview Looking East Hwy 10 TH 96 Arden Hills 55+ Senior Housing Complex Traffic Noise Assessment David Braslau Associates, Inc. Page 6 2.0 TRAFFIC NOISE MONITORING Traffic noise levels were monitored during the PM Peak period (4-5 pm) on Wednesday, September 4, 2024 and during the AM “peak nighttime” period from 6-7 am on Thursday, September 5, 2024. Monitor locations are shown on Figure 2.1. The purpose for monitoring at these sites was to capture noise from free-flowing traffic at a known distance from the nearest travel lane for calibration of the noise prediction model used to evaluate levels at the proposed new building. Peak hour traffic volume on major roadways is normally measured during the 4 to 5 pm hour with free- flowing traffic. However, during the monitoring period there were considerable variations in traffic speed due to the interchanges of Hwy 10 with Interstate 35 to the northwest and Interstate 494 to the southeast. This caused considerable congestion, with highly varying sound level as can be seen in Figure 2.2. However, for purpose of modeling free-flow noise, an assumed free flowing traffic sound level of 74 dBA at the monitor has been assumed for calibrating the noise prediction model for the PM period. Traffic noise levels along TH 96 appeared to flow more smoothly without significant changes in speed. Monitored hourly statistical sound levels along Hwy 10 and TH 96 are presented in Table 2.1. Arden Hills 55+ Senior Housing Complex Traffic Noise Assessment David Braslau Associates, Inc. Page 7 Figure 2.1 Traffic Noise Monitoring Sites Arden Hills 55+ Senior Housing Complex Traffic Noise Assessment David Braslau Associates, Inc. Page 8 Figure 2.2 4-5 PM one-second sound Level Time History on Hwy 10- Interrupted Flow Arden Hills 55+ Senior Housing Complex Traffic Noise Assessment David Braslau Associates, Inc. Page 9 Figure 2.3 6-7 AM one second Sound Level Time History on Hwy 10 Arden Hills 55+ Senior Housing Complex Traffic Noise Assessment David Braslau Associates, Inc. Page 10 Table 2.1 Monitored Hourly Statistical Levels 100 FT FROM HWY 10 WB LANES 100 FT FROM TH96 EB LANES PM AM PM AM L01 79 80 L01 72 73 L10 76 78 L10 69 69 L50 72 75 L50 65 63 L90 67 72 L90 58 56 L99 63 68 L99 54 52 A comparison between AM and PM sound levels when adjusted to 100 feet from the nearest travel lane is presented below in Figure 2.4. At the monitoring location, the difference between hourly PM and AM levels on Highway 10 shows higher AM levels, due to heavy queueing in the afternoon peak hour on Highway 10. Figure 2.4 Comparison of PM and AM Traffic Noise Levels Arden Hills 55+ Senior Housing Complex Traffic Noise Assessment David Braslau Associates, Inc. Page 11 3.0 TRAFFIC NOISE MODEL AND PREDICTIONS 3.1. Traffic Noise Model The MinnNoise traffic noise model, which has shown very good agreement with monitored levels, has been used to predict noise levels associated with vehicle traffic. The traffic noise model geometry with assumed noise receptor sites along the building faces is shown in Figure 3.1. Since the building will provide shielding of noise from the other direction, an assumed barrier in the center of the building ensures that noise from the opposite is shielded. Also shown in Figure 3.1 are homes to the southwest across Hwy 10 that have raised concerns about the new building increasing traffic noise due to reflections off the building. This issue is addressed in Section 4.0 of this report. Hourly traffic volumes on Highway 10 were based on data from ATR (Automatic Traffic Recorder) 10919 which is on Hwy 10 some miles north of the project. The most recent data at this station are from the years 2022 and 2023 and provide realistic traffic volumes for this noise assessment. Increases in traffic of less than 10 percent will have negligible impact on traffic noise levels. The assumed vehicle mix by direction was based on similar traffic noise studies in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area - 95% automobiles, 2% medium trucks and 3% heavy trucks. Initially a posted traffic speed of 55 mph was used on both Hwy 10 and TH 96. However, based on sound level monitoring, it was apparent that a traffic speed of 65 mph was more appropriate for traffic noise predictions on Hwy 10. Assumed vehicle mix and hourly volumes are shown in Table 2.1. “MT” are medium (two-axle trucks) while “HT” are heavy (multi-axle trucks). Table 3.1 Assumed Hourly Volume and Vehicle Mix TH10 ADT EB WB EB WB Auto 3040 2727 3968 3769 MT 64 57 84 79 HT 96 86 125 119 CR96 ADT EB WB EB WB Auto 1122 1007 1465 1392 MT 23 21 31 29 HT 23 21 31 29 AM PM Arden Hills 55+ Senior Housing Complex Traffic Noise Assessment David Braslau Associates, Inc. Page 12 Figure 3.1 Noise Model Receptor Sites – Highest Noise Levels at #9 AND #11 Arden Hills 55+ Senior Housing Complex Traffic Noise Assessment David Braslau Associates, Inc. Page 13 3.2. Noise Model Predictions Traffic noise predictions for Hwy 10 monitoring site are presented in Figure 3.2 for both the 6-7 AM period (covered by nighttime standards) and the 4-5 PM period (covered by daytime standards). As can be seen in the figure, monitored levels were considerably higher for the AM period than expected for a speed of 55 mph. The levels are also higher during the PM period. Therefore, a speed of 65 mph has been assumed for Hwy 10 with predicted levels shown in Figure 3.4 on page 14. Figure 3.2 Predicted Noise Levels (dBA) with 55 MPH on Hwy 10 Arden Hills 55+ Senior Housing Complex Traffic Noise Assessment David Braslau Associates, Inc. Page 14 Traffic noise predictions for the TH 96 monitoring site are presented in Figure 3.3 for both the 6-7 am and 4-5 pm periods. For this roadway the modeled and monitored L10 levels are very close. Figure 3.3 Predicted Noise Levels (dBA) with 55 MPH on TH 96 Arden Hills 55+ Senior Housing Complex Traffic Noise Assessment David Braslau Associates, Inc. Page 15 . Figure 3.4 Adjusted Hwy 10 Predictions with 65 MPH A building outline with predicted AM L10 levels in Figure 3.5 provides a visual presentation of how proximity to roadways shielding by the building affects sound levels. Note the highest level is closest to Hwy10 and the receptors closest to TH 96 are about 5 dBA lower. Figure 3.5 Predicted AM L10 Levels 63 3 68 57 58 65 64 61 62 Arden Hills 55+ Senior Housing Complex Traffic Noise Assessment David Braslau Associates, Inc. Page 16 3.3. Compliance with State Noise Standards The L10 metric is used here to evaluate compliance since standard exceedances for the L50 metric are essentially the same within several dBA. Table 3.2 shows exceedances at all receptor sites relative to the “nighttime” (am) standards in the 6-7 am hour but only two exceedances for R9 and R11 relative to the daytime standards. The daytime exceedance could be considered with modeling error. Table 3.2 Predicted L10 Noise Levels (dBA) re AM and PM Standards Rec L10 AM L10 PM re am55 re pm 65 R1 61 62 6 -3 R2 61 62 6 -3 R3 64 65 9 0 R4 62 63 7 -3 R5 62 63 7 -2 R6 63 64 8 -1 R7 57 58 2 -7 R8 58 59 3 -6 R9 68 69 13 4 R10 61 62 6 -3 R11 65 66 10 1 To comply with Minnesota “nighttime” state noise standards, exceptions to the rules under Subpart 3 of Minnesota Rule 7030.0050 must be met. Under exceptions contained in Minnesota Rules, commercial noise standards (NAC-2) can be applied to residential land use if the exceptions to the rules can be met. The applicable provisions of Minnesota Rule 7030.0050 are presented below. Subp. 3. Exceptions. The noise area classification for land use may be changed in the following ways if the applicable conditions are met. B. The standards for a building in a noise area classification 2 shall be applied to a building in a noise area classification 1 if the following conditions are met: (1) the building is constructed in such a way that the exterior to interior sound level attenuation is at least 30 dB(A) (2) the building has year-round climate control; and (3) the building has no areas or accommodations that are intended for outdoor activities. Three representative living unit plans that have extensive glazing and exposure to traffic noise have been selected for analysis. These are shown in Figure 3.6 below. Arden Hills 55+ Senior Housing Complex Traffic Noise Assessment David Braslau Associates, Inc. Page 17 Figure 3.6 Exterior Facades Evaluated for Exterior Wall Compliance Arden Hills 55+ Senior Housing Complex Traffic Noise Assessment David Braslau Associates, Inc. Page 18 The analysis of exterior-to-interior sound transmission and compliance with exceptions under the state noise rules are summarized in Table 3.3 below. It can be seen that the L10 and L50 levels for the three typical floor plans can be brought into compliance (i.e. 30 dBA exterior façade noise reduction) with the glazing types shown in the table. The composite STC is based upon the sum of acoustical energy passing through the exterior wall and a typical penalty or reduction because of the traffic spectrum is applied. Table 3.3 Exterior-Interior Façade Evaluations Arden Hills 55+ Senior Housing Complex Traffic Noise Assessment David Braslau Associates, Inc. Page 19 4.0 ANALYSIS OF NEW BUILDING RELECTIONS ON ADJACENT HOMES Concerns about possible increases in traffic noise at homes north of TH10 due to reflections off the new building have been raised. This is a rather complex issue due to a continuous traffic noise source along the roadway, several orientations of the building façade and a range of home locations across Highway 10 as seen in Figure 3.1. The currently available traffic noise model from the Federal Highway Administration (TNM 2.5) does not evaluate reflections. However, the latest model TNM 3.2 can evaluate this type of reflections but is not yet readily available for public use. Luckily, a staff member at Bowlby Associates which is the leading consultant on the FHWA noise models kindly offered to run this model on TNM 3.2. Results of this analysis are presented below in Figure 4.1. Figure 4.1 TNM 3.2 Model Results on Reflections Arden Hills 55+ Senior Housing Complex Traffic Noise Assessment David Braslau Associates, Inc. Page 20 Model results are summarized in Table 4.1. There is no information on Home 1 but the effect of refelctions at this site are not expected to be greatly different from the other homes. Table 4.1 TNM 3.2 Model Results HOME With Refl No Refl Effect 2 65.92 65.89 0.03 3 65.75 65.73 0.02 4 64.77 64.76 0.01 5 64.74 64.73 0.01 6 63.14 63.13 0.01 7 63.46 63.45 0.01 8 63.24 63.24 0 Because of the distance from the building and different building façade angles relative to the roadway, sound reflections from the new building are therefore not likely to have a significant effect on sound levels and the perception of traffic noise from the roadways. Even if the building façade were close to and parallel with the roadway, the building surface will still diffuse some of the sound and an increase would always be less than 3 dBA Arden Hills 55+ Senior Housing Complex Traffic Noise Assessment David Braslau Associates, Inc. Page 21 5.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Traffic noise levels were monitored during the PM Peak period (4-5 pm) on Wednesday, September 4, 2024 and during the AM “peak nighttime” period from 6-7 am on Thursday, September 5, 2024. Monitor locations are shown on Figure 2.1 During the monitoring PM monitoring period on TH 10 considerable variations in traffic speed occurred due to the interchanges of Hwy 10 with Interstate 35 to the northwest and Interstate 494 to the southeast. However, for purpose of modeling free-flow noise, an assumed free flowing traffic sound level of 74 dBA at the monitor has been assumed for calibrating the noise prediction model for the PM period. Traffic noise levels along TH 96 appeared to flow more smoothly without significant changes in speed. The MinnNoise computer model has been used to estimate nighttime (6-7 AM) and daytime (4-5 PM) sound levels at selected receptors sites distributed around the proposed building using traffic count data from the MnDOT Traffic Mapping Application and directional and hourly traffic volumes from Automatic Traffic Recorder 10919 located on Hwy 10 north of the project. Vehicle type percentages have been based on similar studies in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. Correlation between predicted values on TH 96 assuming a speed of 55 mph were close to monitored values but on Hwy 10, a speed of 65 mph was needed for good correlation. Predicted daytime levels were mostly below standards but nighttime (6-7 am) levels were exceeded at all receptor sites on the building. Therefore, exceptions to the noise rules are needed to ensure compliance with the standards. At least STC 28 will be needed for all facades but those with glazing would need up to 30 STC glazing to provide the needed 30 dBA reduction in the noise rule. The final section of the study addresses potential increases in traffic noise levels for homes to the southwest across TH 10 due to reflections off the new building. Help from Bowlby Associates, who is the consultant to the FHWA traffic on noise models, was needed to run the newest model (TNM 3.2) that can address reflections off buildings. Results of the analysis show increases from zero to well below 1 dBA which would not be easily detectable. y:\jobs\2024jobs\224009\report\arden-hills-apartments traffic-noise-assessment.doc 2500 Shadywood Road, Suite 130, Orono, MN Phone: 952-401-8757 Memorandum Date: October 17, 2024 To: Trident Development, LLC CC: Dan Wilke, Project Engineer From: K. Dickerson, Ecologist (KES) Re: Tree Survey – Arden Hills, MN Property Information The Northern Heights Lutheran Church is located in Section 21, Township 30N, Range 23W, Arden Hills, Ramsey County, Minnesota. Generally, the site is located northeast of the I-694/I- 35W intersection, south of Highway 96 (Figure 1). The site boundaries correspond to Ramsey County PID: 213023110008. The contact person for this project is Roger Fink with Trident Development LLC. The contact address is 1200 25th Avenue South, St. Cloud, MN 56301. The ~41-acre site is comprised of religious buildings, parking lots, wetlands, and woodlands. The woodland is mostly naturally occurring with some aesthetically planted portions. A figure showing the tree locations (Figure 2) and a table indicating the species, caliper inches (also known as Diameter at Breast Height or DBH), number of stems, and conditions are found below. Tree Survey Requirements per the City of Arden Hills Development of this site requires that a tree survey be completed for sound deciduous hardwood trees measuring greater than ten inches in diameter, deciduous softwood trees measuring greater than 12 inches in diameter, or evergreen trees greater than 15 feet in height. Clumps of trees near site boundaries with diameters greater than 8 inches are also considered significant per the City of Arden Hills; Tree Preservation Ordinance. For tree removal, this ordinance also includes Subd. 5. A. 1. Tree Removal Allowance. Mitigation shall not be required for removing, cutting, or killing trees when: Fewer than ten (10) percent of the total caliper inches of the significant trees on the property are cut, removed, or killed. Dead trees are included in Figure 2 but the caliper inches of these trees are not included in the mitigation. The caliper inches of nuisance and diseased trees were also not included in the mitigation requirements. Tree Survey Information The site plans include building an apartment complex, two new parking lots, and a stormwater pond (Figure 3). The estimated caliper inches of all significant trees proposed to be impacted is 3,702 inches. Table 3 shows these significant trees' size, species, and location in XY coordinates. The total estimated caliper inches of all significant trees on site is 21,982 inches. The total percentage of proposed impacted significant trees is 16.8%. Mitigation is not necessary if fewer than 10% of the caliper inches of the significant trees on the property are cut, removed, or killed (subd. 5.A.1. City of Arden Hills; Tree Preservation Ordinance). The impacted caliper inches above 10% of the total caliper inches need to be mitigated. Trees must be mitigated at a rate of 1:2, or one caliper inch of tree replaced for every 2 caliper inches of tree removed. This project will require a replacement plan for 752 caliper inches of trees (Table 1). Table 1. Significant Tree Caliper Inches for Northern Heights Lutheran Church Caliper inches (DBH) Total significant trees on site 21,982 Total proposed significant tree impact (A) 3,702 10% of total significant trees on site (B) 2,198 Total inches to be replaced. ((A-B)/2) 752 Additional Information Please see the Carlson-McCain landscaping plan for a list of size, species, and locations of replacement trees for this project. Protections for existing trees include fencing around individual trees to the canopy extent and fencing around woodland edges. Please contact Kat Dickerson at kat@kjolhaugenv.com if you have any questions regarding this report. Thank you. Northern Heights-Arden Hill Site Assessment for Significant Trees FIGURES 1. Site Location 2. Tree Survey 3. Impacted Tree Area 4. Easements and ROWs Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NR Can,Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand),NGCC, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community Figure 1: Location Trident-Arden Hills (KES 2024-103)Ramsey, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicatedon this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. ¯0 2,000 Feet Legend Bo undary Source: MNGEO Spatial C ommons, USFWS I-35W 1-694 Hwy 96 !(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !(!(!( !(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !(!(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !(!(!( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !(!(!( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !(!( !(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!(!( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( 9 1 8 922 9 2 0 9 1 6 9 2 4 9 1 4 926 9 1 2 910 9 2 8 9 0 8 9 3 0 9 0 6 904 902 900 898 896 89 4 932 892 934 8 9 0 936 938 9 4 0 9 4 2 944 946 948 950 942 906 928 9 0 8 924 928 936 9 1 4 916 9 4 6 934 93 4 928 926 910 912 914 936 904 932 938 9 0 6 9 0 6 944 932 942 9 2 4 9 3 6 9 1 6 944 924 9 0 4 930 936 910 9 0 2 906 938 904 9 2 4 9 1 2 9 0 4 9 4 4 934 9 4 8 9 1 4 918 930 908 932 9 3 8 926 9 4 4 938 910 916 900 924 910 930 9 0 6 918 906 936 9 2 2 926 928 934 910 9 2 8 930 9 3 2 926 9 3 4 9 4 2 Figure 2: Site Conditions (Photo:TCM 2020) Trident-Arden Hills (KES 2024-103)Ramsey, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicatedon this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. ¯0 150 Feet Legend !(deadd d !(Tre e Bo undary Ramsey Co unty Lidar Source: MNGEO Spatial C ommons, USFWS !(!( !(!( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !(!(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !(!(!( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( 9 2 8 926924 930 922 932 920 934 9 1 8 9 1 6 9 1 4 912 936 938940 910 942 908906 9 0 4 9 0 2 9 0 0 898 89 6 89 4 9 4 4 8 9 2 946 890 9 4 8950952954 930 940 936 926 9 3 6 926 9 1 6 942 928 910 926 926 904 93 8 9 1 4 934 916 9 2 4 942 914 928 9 0 6 926 910 9 4 8 946908 950 906 944 932 9 2 2 9 2 6 93 0 946 944 912 928 9 2 4 924 934 9 3 8 924 9 3 6 9 0 4 930 9 3 0 93 4 910 940 906 932 934 910 918 936924 Figure 3: Proposed Impact Area Trident-Arden Hills (KES 2024-103)Ramsey, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicatedon this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. ¯0 150 Feet Legend !(Dead Tree !(Tree Platinum 55 Grading Extents Revised Ramsey County Lidar Boundary Source: MNGEO Spatial Commons, USFWS Per Information from Trident Development LLC: The small, dark grey parking lot along the eastern entrance is no longer being considered and can be dismissed. There are 119 units in the proposed apartment building, not 124 units. !(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !(!(!( !(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !(!(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !(!(!( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !(!( !( Figure 4: Easements within Project Area Trident-Arden Hills (KES 2024-103)Ramsey, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicatedon this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. ¯0 150 Feet Legend !(Dead Tree !(Tree Utility/Drainage Easements Source: MNGEO Spatial Commons, USFWS Wetland Easement Wetland Easement Wetland Easement Per Information from Trident Development LLC: The small, dark grey parking lot along the eastern entrance is no longer being considered and can be dismissed. There are 119 units in the proposed apartment building, not 124 units. FID Tree_Tag DBH_1 Species Condition Stems Notes x_point y_point 12 1001 13 blue spruce 3 1 555497 204127 20 1002 5 northern white cedar 2 2 4 554794 204912 13 1003 11 red pine 3 1 554683 204964 42 1004 22 black willow 3 1 554819 204904 32 1006 12 green ash 0 1 554673 204988 24 1007 23 eastern cottonwood 4 1 554576 205002 25 1008 21 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554657 205007 27 1010 33 eastern cottonwood 4 1 554718 204992 28 1011 14 black willow 3 3 14, 9 14 554652 205000 29 1012 25 eastern cottonwood 4 1 554639 204994 43 1013 23 black willow 3 1 554627 205004 46 1014 15 black willow 3 1 15' 8 554577 204976 44 1015 13 black willow 3 3 13, 11 13 554607 204923 36 1016 30 black willow 2 1 lying down 554604 204922 66 1017 12 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554503 205011 47 1018 15 black willow 3 1 554490 204936 41 1019 23 black willow 3 1 554599 204914 17 1020 11 blue spruce 2 1 554582 204972 35 1021 26 black willow 2 1 lying down 554694 204967 71 1022 14 boxelder 2 2 7 14 554497 205014 80 1023 8 black willow 2 8 Three main trunks removed 554349 204912 91 1024 11 common buckthorn 3 2 10 11 554295 204980 95 1025 11 eastern red cedar 3 1 554253 204861 94 1026 12 boxelder 2 1 554277 204806 77 1027 11 red elm 3 1 554256 204816 83 1028 9 boxelder 3 1 554300 204943 82 1029 8 boxelder 3 1 554234 205001 88 1030 9 American elm 3 1 554234 205001 142 1032 22 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554401 204899 106 1033 16 blue spruce 3 1 554411 204552 105 1034 5 northern white cedar 3 4 4' 4' 2 554578 204850 108 1035 14 blue spruce 3 1 554502 204762 113 1038 14 blue spruce 2 1 estimated dbh lying down tree 554457 204721 115 1039 11 blue spruce 3 1 554448 204858 110 1040 12 blue spruce 3 1 554433 204828 109 1041 12 blue spruce 3 1 554456 204859 147 1042 17 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554536 204827 126 1043 10 quaking aspen 3 1 554403 204526 136 1044 20 eastern cottonwood 2 1 554293 204618 124 1045 10 common buckthorn 1 1 554390 204582 143 1046 16 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554280 204659 128 1047 10 quaking aspen 3 1 554409 204549 133 1048 17 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554302 204611 140 1049 17 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554400 204575 170 1050 17 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554402 204551 161 1051 10 quaking aspen 2 1 554267 204509 134 1053 12 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554326 204449 144 1054 27 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554394 204575 138 1055 26 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554406 204543 122 1056 10 quaking aspen 3 1 554399 204555 176 1057 9 red elm 4 3 6, 7 9 554311 204636 165 1058 32 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554158 204636 149 1059 12 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554260 204515 152 1061 27 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554393 204495 171 1062 18 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554415 204495 150 1063 12 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554265 204511 174 1064 26 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554411 204498 172 1065 19 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554221 204565 173 1066 22 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554263 204511 156 1067 9 quaking aspen 2 1 554251 204496 157 1068 10 quaking aspen 3 1 554379 204461 167 1069 28 eastern cottonwood 2 1 damaged trunk 554375 204449 162 1070 12 boxelder 3 2 11 12 554262 204511 186 1071 14 eastern red cedar 3 2 7 7 554289 204484 185 1072 12 red elm 2 1 554104 204648 187 1073 5 eastern red cedar 3 1 554105 204661 182 1074 34 eastern cottonwood 4 1 554111 204621 183 1075 34 eastern cottonwood 4 1 554136 204664 179 1076 29 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554138 204662 177 1077 9 boxelder 2 3 6, 4 9 554150 204669 193 1078 14 American elm 2 2 14 14 554154 204661 204 1079 46 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554197 204594 201 1080 13 boxelder 3 2 6 13 554232 204501 197 1081 6 eastern red cedar 3 1 554212 204535 198 1082 5 eastern red cedar 3 1 554183 204539 194 1083 11 eastern red cedar 3 1 554197 204535 200 1084 4 eastern red cedar 3 1 554184 204565 199 1085 4 eastern red cedar 2 1 554198 204527 192 1086 14 boxelder 2 1 554200 204529 190 1087 19 green ash 1 1 554191 204588 189 1088 3 eastern red cedar 2 1 554177 204584 49 1089 12 black willow 3 3 6, 6 554168 204593 53 1090 19 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554569 204890 57 1091 15 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554548 204885 55 1092 18 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554536 204895 50 1093 12 black willow 1 2 10-dead 554538 204890 62 1094 17 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554560 204886 65 1095 17 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554506 204899 58 1096 15 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554491 204935 61 1097 8 black willow 3 1 tag on the side 554522 204891 64 1098 12 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554507 204899 68 1099 22 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554491 204936 52 1100 18 black willow 3 1 tag on side 554482 204928 26 1101 15.5 black willow 2 1 554556 204892 30 1102 15 black willow 3 1 554635 204964 31 1103 12.5 black willow 2 1 554628 204956 34 1104 25 black willow 2 2 8.5+12.5 554616 204944 37 1105 38 black willow 1 3 20,9,9 554616 204938 38 1106 12.5 black willow 3 1 554616 204939 39 1107 14 black willow 2 1 554607 204931 40 1108 23 eastern cottonwood 2 1 554621 204929 45 1109 14.5 black willow 1 1 554614 204927 48 1110 14 black willow 1 1 554600 204886 51 1111 13 eastern cottonwood 4 1 554598 204886 54 1112 23 black willow 2 2 8,15 554583 204882 63 1114 20 eastern cottonwood 2 1 554528 204865 67 1115 21.5 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554502 204907 76 1117 27 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554428 204886 78 1118 12.5 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554424 204878 79 1119 26 eastern cottonwood 2 1 554414 204862 81 1121 38 eastern cottonwood 2 2 20,18 554425 204841 84 1122 28.5 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554410 204847 85 1123 37 eastern cottonwood 3 2 29.5,7.5 554409 204830 96 1127 11.5 boxelder 2 1 554410 204777 107 1131 16 blue spruce 3 1 554411 204755 118 1133 15.5 blue spruce 3 1 554404 204711 121 1134 34.5 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554418 204667 123 1135 10 boxelder 2 1 554392 204648 125 1136 11 boxelder 1 1 554393 204639 129 1137 31 eastern cottonwood 3 2 15,16 554338 204639 130 1138 15.5 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554401 204631 131 1139 15 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554394 204614 135 1140 13 blue spruce 2 1 554401 204581 137 1141 9.5 blue spruce 2 1 554425 204593 141 1142 16.5 eastern cottonwood 2 1 554434 204566 145 1143 10.25 white pine 2 1 554410 204557 153 1144 13.5 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554445 204535 155 1145 56 eastern cottonwood 2 2 26,30 554425 204491 159 1146 11 blue spruce 2 1 554464 204495 160 1147 13 blue spruce 3 1 554488 204517 163 1148 11 boxelder 2 1 554504 204496 166 1150 10.5 boxelder 3 1 554517 204483 169 1151 8.5 boxelder 2 1 554515 204476 175 1152 55 black willow 2 1 554538 204474 188 1153 12.5 boxelder 2 1 554517 204463 191 1154 52 black willow 1 1 554579 204437 195 1155 11 boxelder 2 1 554573 204427 205 1157 11 boxelder 3 1 554572 204413 209 1158 13 black walnut 2 1 554603 204433 214 1159 9 boxelder 2 1 554629 204396 215 1160 10 boxelder 2 1 554608 204410 224 1161 20 boxelder 2 2 10,10 554599 204402 228 1162 8.5 quaking aspen 4 1 554613 204375 229 1163 10.5 boxelder 3 1 554580 204363 231 1164 19.5 boxelder 3 3 7,9,3.5 554582 204379 234 1165 11 quaking aspen 3 1 554546 204356 236 1166 12 quaking aspen 3 1 554489 204350 238 1167 13 quaking aspen 3 1 554489 204346 240 1168 10 quaking aspen 3 1 554467 204368 298 1169 25 boxelder 2 3 9,7,9 554457 204391 307 1171 10.5 boxelder 2 1 554669 204370 309 1172 19.5 Siberian elm 2 1 554699 204370 313 1173 13 Siberian elm 2 1 554730 204373 316 1174 15 red maple 3 1 554728 204378 322 1175 42.5 boxelder 2 6 9,7,8,6,4.5,8 554757 204382 329 1176 41 peachleaf willow 2 5 8,10,7,11,5 554722 204404 340 1178 14.5 red maple 2 1 554723 204429 344 1179 11.5 northern white cedar 3 2 7.5, 4 554765 204399 346 1180 10 northern white cedar 3 1 554776 204401 347 1181 10 crabapple 3 1 554796 204379 351 1182 30 crabapple 3 7 7. 7 5 4, 3, 2, 2 554795 204387 353 1183 19 northern white cedar 3 3 5.5, 6.5. 7 554793 204404 357 1184 12 northern white cedar 3 2 7, 5 554790 204420 361 1185 55 crabapple 3 10 9, 6, 4, 3, 6, 3, 9, 7, 4, 4 554779 204410 363 1186 32 crabapple 3 6 9, 3, 5, 3, 4, 8 554849 204409 375 1187 11.5 red pine 3 1 554862 204432 377 1188 13.5 red pine 3 1 554696 204309 390 1189 9 red pine 1 1 554699 204314 393 1190 15 boxelder 2 3 5,4,6 554699 204288 405 1191 29.5 eastern cottonwood 2 1 554714 204280 402 1192 44.5 eastern cottonwood 2 2 554711 204255 387 1193 13.5 red pine 2 1 554717 204265 385 1194 13.5 red pine 2 1 554693 204293 381 1195 13 red pine 3 1 554701 204306 333 1197 20 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554706 204317 277 1199 16 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554714 204423 537 1201 37 eastern cottonwood 2 2 20,17 554682 204430 534 1202 9.5 northern pin oak 3 1 555229 204416 535 1203 11.5 northern pin oak 2 1 555211 204405 533 1204 24 American elm 1 2 12,8 555218 204411 542 1205 24 eastern cottonwood 1 1 555193 204405 536 1206 41 eastern cottonwood 3 2 555287 204430 545 1207 15 eastern cottonwood 1 1 555226 204406 531 1208 14.5 northern pin oak 3 1 555318 204446 530 1209 20 northern pin oak 3 1 555127 204401 532 1210 15 red maple 2 1 15 555089 204436 546 1211 13 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555188 204402 539 1212 55.5 eastern cottonwood 2 3 14.5, 23, 18 555330 204447 553 1213 20 eastern cottonwood 1 1 555241 204428 538 1214 10 eastern cottonwood 2 1 555354 204466 540 1215 16.5 eastern cottonwood 2 1 555236 204420 547 1216 17 eastern cottonwood 2 1 555254 204430 559 1217 57 white spruce 3 3 24, 15, 18 555340 204454 573 1218 11 Scots pine 2 1 555509 204595 579 1219 8 Scots pine 1 1 555626 204570 577 1220 10.5 Scots pine 2 1 555610 204577 567 1221 11.5 quaking aspen 3 1 555616 204560 561 1222 52 white spruce 3 2 22 + 30 (wide branch) 555635 204604 578 1223 12 Scots pine 2 1 555552 204602 564 1224 16 quaking aspen 3 1 555611 204569 563 1225 12 quaking aspen 2 1 555624 204613 575 1226 11.5 Scots pine 2 1 555624 204615 570 1227 13 Scots pine 3 1 555637 204566 582 1228 11 quaking aspen 3 1 555636 204607 595 1229 28 boxelder 3 1 555587 204580 604 1230 12 boxelder 2 1 555466 204487 609 1231 13.5 boxelder 3 1 555426 204445 599 1232 12 American elm 3 1 555429 204408 585 1233 17 American elm 2 1 555456 204459 592 1234 13 boxelder 2 1 555540 204577 597 1235 17 boxelder 2 1 555479 204507 600 1236 39.5 eastern cottonwood 4 1 555464 204475 588 1237 19.5 boxelder 1 2 9, 10.5 555448 204456 583 1238 13.5 quaking aspen 3 1 555502 204575 602 1239 18.5 boxelder 1 2 7, 11.5 555561 204586 589 1240 24 boxelder 3 1 555436 204449 606 1241 12 boxelder 1 1 555503 204533 608 1242 10 boxelder 2 1 555429 204420 611 1243 13.5 boxelder 2 1 555440 204421 613 1244 11 boxelder 2 1 555429 204410 614 1245 13.5 boxelder 3 1 555451 204432 616 1246 24 American elm 3 1 555428 204389 618 1247 25 eastern cottonwood 2 1 555406 204379 620 1248 12.5 black walnut 3 1 555386 204381 623 1249 21.5 eastern cottonwood 1 2 13.5 7 555367 204384 624 1250 16.5 quaking aspen 2 2 10.5, 6 555361 204375 626 1251 12.5 quaking aspen 2 1 555349 204359 629 1252 33 crabapple 2 4 Crabapple (9, 8, 8, 8) 555336 204362 633 1253 14 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555315 204364 634 1254 11.5 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555319 204333 636 1255 10.5 boxelder 3 1 555315 204341 637 1256 10.5 boxelder 3 1 555479 204430 644 1257 16 boxelder 2 1 8, 8 555499 204452 641 1258 19 boxelder 2 1 555565 204480 650 1259 9 Scots pine 2 1 555516 204493 651 1260 6 Scots pine 1 1 555597 204523 648 1261 17.5 boxelder 3 1 555604 204530 638 1262 14 boxelder 1 1 555587 204501 643 1263 30 black walnut 4 2 15, 15 555507 204474 653 1264 9 Scots pine 2 1 555545 204479 655 1265 10 Scots pine 1 1 555603 204533 656 1266 10 black walnut 1 1 555596 204543 658 1267 8 Scots pine 2 1 555600 204548 662 1268 8 Scots pine 2 1 555596 204566 666 1269 12.5 Scots pine 2 1 555615 204548 667 1270 10.5 Scots pine 1 1 555624 204539 669 1271 10.5 Scots pine 3 1 555635 204548 671 1272 11.5 Scots pine 3 1 555625 204540 670 1273 12.5 Scots pine 3 1 555636 204536 674 1274 11.5 Scots pine 3 1 555629 204540 676 1275 13.5 Scots pine 3 1 555636 204527 679 1276 14 Scots pine 3 1 555632 204512 681 1277 13 Scots pine 2 1 555637 204509 685 1278 28 black walnut 2 2 12, 16 555632 204497 695 1279 29 American elm 2 1 555616 204476 691 1280 10 boxelder 2 1 555578 204458 699 1281 15 boxelder 2 1 555599 204465 690 1282 14 boxelder 2 1 555523 204458 689 1283 13.5 boxelder 3 1 555596 204458 688 1284 11.5 boxelder 2 1 555592 204467 697 1285 11 boxelder 2 1 555604 204471 698 1286 10 northern catalpa 3 1 555559 204468 701 1287 13 boxelder 2 1 555548 204453 702 1288 17 boxelder 1 1 555498 204425 703 1289 15.5 boxelder 2 1 555469 204410 704 1290 10.5 boxelder 2 1 555439 204376 711 1291 75 eastern cottonwood 3 4 12, 20, 23, 20 555433 204357 710 1292 13 American elm 2 1 555402 204329 729 1293 11.5 blue spruce 3 1 555410 204349 715 1294 11 black walnut 3 1 555067 204281 707 1295 11.5 American elm 3 1 555366 204331 728 1296 32 crabapple 3 5 6, 7, 8, 5, 6 (Crabapple) 555416 204341 730 1297 29.5 crabapple 3 5 5, 5, 7, 7.5, 5 (Crabapple) 555072 204299 581 1298 7.5 Scots pine 3 1 555068 204253 395 1299 12 quaking aspen 2 1 555594 204586 397 1300 11.5 boxelder 1 1 555314 204670 242 1301 41 crabapple 3 4 13, 7, 10, 11 crabapple 555316 204638 246 1302 12 white spruce 3 1 554812 204720 248 1303 19 blue spruce 4 1 554836 204758 249 1304 15 black spruce 3 1 554774 204737 251 1305 10.5 red pine 3 1 554747 204747 252 1306 13.5 red pine 4 1 554888 204987 253 1307 20 American elm 3 2 6 14 554895 205000 254 1308 15.5 eastern red cedar 2 3 9.5, 3, 3 554890 205010 255 1309 11 eastern red cedar 2 1 554897 205020 256 1310 7 eastern red cedar 2 1 554913 205011 257 1311 21 boxelder 3 2 12, 9 554928 205014 259 1312 5 red pine 3 1 554926 204994 261 1313 10 red pine 3 1 554965 204977 262 1314 5 red pine 3 1 554963 204959 263 1315 15 black walnut 1 1 554958 204965 266 1316 18 boxelder 2 2 11 7 555010 204971 267 1317 21 boxelder 4 2 10, 11 554993 205011 269 1318 20 black walnut 1 4 5, 5, 3 7 554999 205015 270 1319 15 crabapple 4 3 crabapple 3 5 7 555017 204929 271 1320 10.5 red pine 3 1 555011 204911 272 1321 13 red pine 3 1 555011 204911 276 1322 13 American elm 3 1 554961 204913 286 1323 17 green ash 3 1 9+8 554879 204941 295 1324 30.5 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554989 204869 297 1325 13 boxelder 4 3 5+5+3 555029 204836 302 1326 11 eastern red cedar 4 1 555009 204836 306 1327 23 eastern cottonwood 4 1 555036 204814 314 1328 14 boxelder 4 2 6+8 555062 204822 324 1329 10 quaking aspen 1 1 555018 204705 326 1330 12 quaking aspen 3 1 555064 204661 328 1331 15 quaking aspen 3 1 555066 204654 331 1332 11 boxelder 4 1 555068 204647 337 1333 10 boxelder 4 1 555083 204659 345 1334 11 crabapple 4 1 crabbapple 555101 204665 348 1335 10 quaking aspen 1 1 555123 204673 352 1336 10 quaking aspen 3 1 555132 204684 358 1337 10 quaking aspen 3 1 555138 204678 365 1338 11 quaking aspen 3 1 555164 204682 366 1339 15 quaking aspen 1 2 9+6 555197 204682 368 1340 11 quaking aspen 3 1 555220 204677 449 1341 18 eastern cottonwood 4 1 555223 204665 713 1342 16 red elm 2 1 555425 204625 494 1343 10 white pine 4 1 554616 204080 419 1344 18 eastern cottonwood 4 1 555148 204594 404 1345 23 boxelder 4 1 9+14 555408 204665 460 1346 27 eastern cottonwood 4 1 555374 204681 398 1347 14.5 eastern red cedar 3 1 6.5+8 555351 204639 424 1348 25 eastern cottonwood 4 1 555322 204678 428 1349 24 eastern cottonwood 2 1 555414 204681 391 1350 14 quaking aspen 2 1 555416 204679 470 1351 4 white spruce 3 1 555292 204673 394 1352 11 red pine 3 1 555265 204616 433 1353 10 common buckthorn 4 2 6+4 555314 204689 708 1354 11 red pine 3 1 555459 204678 422 1355 14 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554590 204096 396 1356 13 quaking aspen 3 1 555413 204675 486 1357 3 white spruce 3 1 555318 204679 440 1358 10 common buckthorn 4 4 3+3+2+2 555193 204597 426 1359 10 eastern cottonwood 4 1 555550 204693 400 1360 13 quaking aspen 3 1 555415 204682 490 1361 11 green ash 4 1 555339 204693 408 1363 21.5 eastern cottonwood 4 1 554652 204120 374 1364 10 quaking aspen 3 1 555384 204647 476 1365 6 white spruce 4 1 555244 204676 371 1366 10 quaking aspen 4 1 555227 204604 373 1367 12 quaking aspen 3 1 555238 204675 378 1368 10 quaking aspen 2 1 555245 204681 520 1369 19 northern pin oak 4 1 555254 204681 692 1370 10 red pine 4 1 555016 204647 412 1371 27 green ash 2 2 11+16 554611 204113 423 1372 12 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555392 204681 370 1373 10 quaking aspen 3 1 555411 204684 480 1374 4 white spruce 3 1 555235 204681 452 1375 20 eastern cottonwood 2 1 Two dead stems 555220 204609 384 1377 11 quaking aspen 2 1 555130 204560 522 1379 20 northern pin oak 4 1 555129 204564 447 1380 16 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555000 204652 645 1381 16 eastern cottonwood 4 1 555428 204615 388 1382 11 quaking aspen 2 1 554690 204182 718 1384 7 red pine 3 1 555278 204678 445 1385 15 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554615 204077 482 1386 3 white spruce 4 1 555428 204613 462 1387 13 common buckthorn 4 3 6+4+3 555199 204608 517 1388 10 white spruce 4 1 555340 204611 883 1389 39 eastern cottonwood 4 2 26+13 555044 204598 465 1390 35 common buckthorn 4 11 5+3+3+3+5+4+2+2+3+3+2 554846 203817 617 1391 32 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555330 204612 369 1392 12 quaking aspen 3 1 554676 204203 474 1393 5 white spruce 3 1 555226 204673 488 1394 5 white spruce 2 1 555240 204608 456 1395 19 eastern cottonwood 4 1 555193 204595 444 1396 30 eastern cottonwood 2 2 14+16 555371 204638 654 1397 16 white pine 4 1 555432 204613 506 1398 15 American elm 4 1 554632 204179 680 1399 8 red pine 3 1 555084 204530 454 1400 22 eastern cottonwood 4 1 554591 204106 218 1401 23 black willow 3 1 555391 204637 208 1402 5 eastern red cedar 2 1 554310 204442 211 1403 3 eastern red cedar 2 1 554273 204469 212 1404 4 eastern red cedar 2 1 554288 204469 217 1405 8 eastern red cedar 3 1 554288 204468 213 1406 13 eastern red cedar 3 1 554286 204435 216 1407 22 black willow 2 1 554290 204454 222 1408 10 quaking aspen 3 1 554299 204441 223 1409 10 quaking aspen 4 1 554409 204432 221 1410 11 boxelder 3 1 554449 204436 220 1411 18 boxelder 3 2 15, 17 554428 204452 219 1412 16 American elm 3 1 554338 204398 210 1413 3 eastern red cedar 2 1 554342 204402 207 1414 4 eastern red cedar 2 1 554277 204466 206 1415 8 eastern red cedar 3 1 554263 204471 230 1416 12 quaking aspen 3 1 554265 204472 232 1417 12 quaking aspen 3 1 554536 204378 239 1418 14 quaking aspen 3 1 554498 204355 235 1419 11 quaking aspen 3 1 554484 204408 498 1420 12 white pine 3 1 554490 204361 489 1421 12.5 white pine 3 1 555127 204584 485 1424 8 white pine 3 1 555175 204595 492 1426 9.5 white pine 3 1 554501 204440 483 1427 11.5 white pine 4 1 555170 204594 499 1428 11 white pine 3 1 555179 204605 495 1429 10.5 white pine 3 1 555126 204585 466 1430 11 American elm 4 1 555123 204582 473 1431 13.5 white pine 4 1 555254 204631 443 1432 11 eastern cottonwood 2 1 555237 204604 463 1433 11 Scots pine 3 1 555361 204619 472 1434 18 boxelder 2 2 9 9 555265 204642 457 1435 11.5 Scots pine 2 1 555250 204615 438 1436 18 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555275 204634 453 1437 13 black walnut 3 1 555447 204649 455 1438 10 red pine 2 1 555300 204613 461 1439 8 Scots pine 2 1 555290 204612 437 1440 17.5 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555271 204631 446 1441 31 common buckthorn 4 6 5 q4 6 5 5 6 555445 204646 436 1442 13.5 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555336 204619 417 1443 15 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555449 204651 421 1444 20 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555378 204661 429 1445 11 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555390 204662 434 1446 29 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555437 204659 425 1447 28 eastern cottonwood 2 1 555436 204668 430 1448 30 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555403 204649 432 1448 10.5 eastern cottonwood 4 3 30 19 26 555439 204661 401 1449 18 boxelder 2 1 555436 204669 416 1450 18 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555334 204639 414 1451 26 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555369 204651 413 1452 14 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555367 204642 406 1453 16 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555367 204642 407 1454 26 eastern cottonwood 4 1 555355 204658 403 1455 10.5 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555344 204657 410 1456 12 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555364 204644 418 1457 9 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555326 204673 285 1458 13 eastern red cedar 3 1 555376 204665 247 1459 11 white spruce 3 1 554956 204860 383 1460 10 quaking aspen 2 1 554837 204737 552 1461 8 American elm 4 1 555254 204678 661 1462 8 Scots pine 2 1 555352 204468 355 1463 22 red pine 3 1 555593 204574 245 1464 19 white spruce 3 1 555175 204649 550 1465 36 eastern cottonwood 2 1 554808 204764 243 1466 11 red elm 2 1 555351 204459 379 1467 17.5 quaking aspen 1 1 554792 204736 349 1468 15.5 boxelder 2 2 8 9.5 555241 204676 317 1469 12.5 white spruce 2 1 555177 204636 315 1470 11 blue spruce 2 1 555012 204679 323 1471 28 quaking aspen 2 1 555012 204689 244 1473 13.5 white spruce 3 1 555063 204632 319 1474 14 white spruce 3 1 554809 204744 283 1475 14.5 quaking aspen 3 2 8 6 555021 204652 574 1476 7 Scots pine 3 1 554929 204881 260 1477 21 red pine 3 1 555629 204569 515 1478 12 northern pin oak 4 1 554964 204974 359 1479 17 red pine 3 1 554998 204566 519 1480 8 white spruce 3 1 555188 204628 1148 1481 16 red pine 3 1 555032 204616 325 1482 17 blue spruce 4 1 555278 203291 288 1483 12.5 boxelder 4 3 6 4 7 555059 204592 557 1484 12 black walnut 3 1 554985 204853 335 1485 8.5 boxelder 1 1 6 6 555508 204580 502 1486 17 white pine 3 1 555095 204624 389 1487 75 quaking aspen 3 1 555126 204590 556 1489 29 eastern cottonwood 2 1 555282 204655 290 1490 6 eastern red cedar 3 1 555373 204501 281 1491 13 eastern red cedar 1 1 554970 204838 311 1492 8.5 white spruce 2 1 554922 204878 521 1493 26 red maple 4 1 15 11 555006 204717 524 1494 18 northern pin oak 4 1 555002 204640 301 1495 14 white spruce 3 1 555005 204505 343 1496 12 quaking aspen 3 1 555001 204783 376 1497 8 eastern red cedar 1 1 555135 204631 392 1498 11.5 quaking aspen 2 1 555237 204670 296 1499 12 red maple 3 1 555302 204671 241 1500 24 blue spruce 4 2 12, 12 knot at dbh 554991 204821 427 1501 16 boxelder 2 1 554821 204718 431 1502 18 red elm 3 1 554619 204375 439 1503 5 Norway spruce 3 1 554623 204351 441 1504 5 Norway spruce 3 1 554586 204334 442 1505 4.5 Norway spruce 3 1 554585 204325 448 1506 22.5 boxelder 1 1 7 + 9.5 + 6 554575 204321 451 1507 7.5 eastern red cedar 1 1 554507 204290 458 1508 10 pin cherry 2 2 5, 5 554493 204282 467 1510 6 eastern red cedar 1 1 554476 204242 468 1511 33 American elm 2 4 10.5 9.5 10 3 554500 204252 469 1512 28.5 American elm 1 4 8.5 9 3.5 7.5 554511 204262 471 1513 11 eastern red cedar 2 2 7 4 554516 204268 475 1514 5.5 eastern red cedar 1 1 554510 204283 477 1515 3.5 eastern red cedar 1 1 554532 204278 479 1516 10.5 American elm 2 1 554535 204278 481 1517 6 eastern red cedar 1 1 554537 204284 484 1518 7 eastern red cedar 1 1 554542 204276 487 1519 16 red pine 2 1 554541 204276 491 1520 12 black cherry 3 2 7, 5 554551 204275 493 1521 13 eastern red cedar 1 1 554549 204269 496 1522 3.5 eastern red cedar 2 1 554527 204268 500 1523 4 eastern red cedar 1 1 554516 204268 503 1524 9 eastern red cedar 2 2 5, 4 554517 204259 505 1525 5.5 eastern red cedar 2 1 554513 204249 507 1526 5.5 eastern red cedar 2 1 554499 204249 509 1527 4 eastern red cedar 2 1 554499 204244 513 1528 4 eastern red cedar 2 1 554492 204244 514 1529 4 eastern red cedar 2 1 554509 204234 516 1530 3 eastern red cedar 2 1 554507 204226 518 1531 5.5 eastern red cedar 2 1 554504 204228 523 1532 15.5 eastern red cedar 2 2 8.5, 7 554499 204226 525 1533 5.5 eastern red cedar 1 1 554526 204250 526 1534 4 balsam fir 3 1 554540 204251 527 1535 5 Norway spruce 3 1 554561 204306 528 1536 5.5 Norway spruce 3 1 554578 204304 664 1538 6 eastern red cedar 2 1 554637 204321 719 1539 12.5 eastern cottonwood 2 1 554670 204159 717 1540 17 eastern cottonwood 2 1 554707 204160 687 1541 18 white pine 3 1 554707 204150 580 1542 29 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554661 204139 735 1543 5.5 red pine 2 1 554553 204175 682 1544 5.5 eastern red cedar 2 1 554709 204114 741 1545 11 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554626 204156 694 1546 16 red elm 2 1 554704 204097 732 1547 18.5 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554668 204130 625 1548 18 eastern cottonwood 2 1 554755 204151 712 1549 11 eastern cottonwood 2 1 554689 204240 646 1550 23 eastern cottonwood 2 1 554705 204132 791 1551 8 blue spruce 2 1 554707 204176 794 1552 8.5 blue spruce 2 1 554813 204066 593 1553 8.5 American elm 1 1 554815 204065 586 1554 28 eastern cottonwood 2 1 554566 204171 639 1555 15.5 American elm 3 3 5,5.5,5 554524 204167 652 1556 15.5 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554733 204168 780 1557 16.5 white mulberry 3 2 10,6.5 554709 204163 796 1558 8.5 blue spruce 2 1 554796 204085 801 1559 12.5 blue spruce 2 1 554812 204070 757 1560 10.5 eastern cottonwood 1 1 554824 204062 649 1561 15 eastern cottonwood 2 1 554694 204087 705 1562 12 eastern cottonwood 1 1 554709 204172 673 1563 7.5 eastern red cedar 2 1 554693 204143 709 1564 12 eastern cottonwood 2 1 554633 204165 727 1565 12 eastern cottonwood 2 1 554703 204138 750 1566 12 American elm 3 1 554718 204139 548 1568 10.5 boxelder 2 2 4,6.5 554623 204331 555 1569 3 eastern red cedar 2 1 554622 204261 722 1570 11 eastern cottonwood 1 1 554616 204257 628 1571 7 red pine 2 1 554716 204157 630 1572 6.5 red pine 2 1 554700 204231 603 1573 4 eastern red cedar 3 1 554710 204221 678 1574 7 eastern red cedar 2 1 554638 204219 596 1575 11 red oak 3 1 554634 204154 786 1576 7 blue spruce 2 1 554567 204182 635 1577 5 Scots pine 2 1 554810 204065 785 1578 9 blue spruce 2 1 554721 204196 571 1579 3 Norway spruce 3 1 554801 204073 760 1581 12.5 eastern cottonwood 1 1 554581 204228 565 1582 4 balsam fir 3 1 554689 204081 660 1583 7 eastern red cedar 2 1 554585 204235 657 1584 5 Norway spruce 2 1 554673 204175 622 1585 5 eastern red cedar 2 1 554682 204179 558 1586 5 eastern red cedar 1 1 554678 204236 632 1587 23.5 eastern cottonwood 2 1 554613 204254 610 1588 32 eastern cottonwood 2 1 554718 204196 615 1589 14 eastern cottonwood 2 1 554666 204231 745 1590 7.5 Norway spruce 3 1 554673 204225 754 1591 10 eastern cottonwood 1 1 554696 204103 769 1592 10 blue spruce 3 1 554697 204087 619 1593 28 eastern cottonwood 2 1 554736 204087 776 1594 12 Amur maple 3 2 7.5,4.5 554680 204236 804 1595 11 red pine 2 2 8,3 554801 204099 818 1596 14 eastern cottonwood 2 2 8,6 554827 204060 810 1597 32 crabapple 4 6 4,4,5,5,7,7. 554780 203963 420 1598 17 Scots pine 2 1 554851 204139 415 1599 7 blue spruce 3 1 554731 204235 411 1600 28.5 eastern cottonwood 2 1 554728 204244 1335 1601 9 red pine 2 1 554717 204253 1317 1603 10 common buckthorn 3 1 555402 203585 1259 1604 10 red elm 3 1 555521 203402 1322 1605 4 blue spruce 2 1 555428 203466 1446 1606 10 common buckthorn 3 3 6+2+2 555600 203413 1005 1607 20 common buckthorn 4 7 2(4x)+4(3x) 555552 203597 1179 1608 10 red elm 1 1 555045 203517 1362 1609 6 red pine 3 1 555376 203334 1002 1610 12 red pine 3 1 555620 203378 1030 1611 9 red pine 2 1 554999 203584 1242 1612 10 red pine 3 1 555156 203392 1245 1613 9 red pine 3 1 555398 203486 1327 1614 3 blue spruce 2 1 555410 203494 1351 1615 25 boxelder 3 3 8+9+8 555625 203421 958 1616 12 white pine 4 1 555619 203392 914 1617 17 red elm 2 1 555010 203658 952 1618 17 American elm 3 1 554927 203727 907 1619 8 red pine 3 1 554985 203651 1119 1620 12 quaking aspen 2 1 554897 203776 1157 1621 8 red pine 3 1 555374 203218 911 1622 13 boxelder 4 1 555326 203329 1404 1623 41 eastern cottonwood 4 1 554911 203767 1454 1624 10 eastern red cedar 3 1 555458 203747 1363 1625 11 red pine 3 1 555615 203554 1481 1626 6 eastern red cedar 3 1 555615 203380 1438 1627 10 quaking aspen 3 1 555596 203609 1410 1628 10 quaking aspen 3 1 555525 203667 1466 1629 10 Amur maple 2 1 6+2+2 555497 203741 1476 1630 28 Amur maple 2 6 4+4+8+6+3+3 555634 203481 1292 1631 10 common buckthorn 2 3 4+4+2 555607 203586 1116 1632 10 common buckthorn 3 4 2+2+1+5 555452 203291 1111 1633 8 red pine 3 1 555270 203145 1302 1634 20 boxelder 3 2 11+9 555256 203151 1305 1635 9 red pine 3 1 555626 203337 1222 1636 23 boxelder 2 1 8+9+6 555609 203359 1076 1637 9 red pine 3 1 555301 203485 1028 1638 10 red pine 4 1 555223 203213 1314 1639 10 common buckthorn 3 3 4+3+3 555145 203392 1008 1640 13 quaking aspen 1 1 555636 203362 995 1641 10 northern pin oak 3 1 555080 203507 1155 1642 6 red pine 3 1 555109 203709 1433 1643 10 boxelder 1 1 555323 203325 955 1644 8 eastern red cedar 3 1 555505 203684 1419 1645 11 quaking aspen 2 1 554986 203651 1479 1646 36 black willow 3 2 ? 10+26 555512 203725 1001 1647 12 red pine 3 1 555597 203590 1006 1648 10 quaking aspen 1 1 5+5 554998 203589 939 1649 11 blue spruce 3 1 555061 203541 934 1650 71 eastern cottonwood 3 3 49+13+9 554988 203689 919 1651 20 boxelder 3 2 12+8 554961 203673 925 1652 13 red pine 3 1 554945 203697 973 1653 8 red pine 3 1 554974 203693 924 1655 5 blue spruce 2 1 555098 203723 1025 1656 11 red pine 3 1 554968 203689 1333 1657 6 blue spruce 3 1 555140 203391 1266 1658 10 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555627 203410 1457 1659 14 boxelder 3 1 8+6 555435 203433 1461 1660 10 eastern red cedar 3 1 555630 203543 1257 1661 11 red pine 3 1 555632 203493 1250 1662 10 red pine 3 1 555419 203471 1450 1663 12 eastern red cedar 3 1 555412 203482 1252 1664 5 red pine 3 1 555602 203556 1232 1665 4 red pine 3 1 555411 203477 1497 1666 10 common buckthorn 3 3 4+3+3 555371 203490 1229 1667 15 red pine 2 1 8+7 555576 203705 1239 1668 15 Amur maple 3 5 5+4+2+1+3 555368 203497 1315 1669 15 boxelder 3 1 8+7 555379 203486 1217 1670 5 white pine 3 1 555635 203360 1011 1671 17 red elm 2 3 8+6+3 555302 203423 1021 1672 14 eastern red cedar 3 1 8+6 555058 203508 1031 1673 11 white pine 3 1 555068 203492 996 1674 12 black locust 3 1 555162 203388 966 1675 13 boxelder 2 2 9+4 555106 203688 985 1676 11 northern pin oak 4 1 555031 203636 945 1677 6 white pine 3 1 555091 203755 1143 1678 7 red pine 3 1 554996 203676 949 1679 58 red elm 2 1 12+22+24 555294 203294 938 1680 4 red pine 3 1 555001 203680 1214 1681 11 quaking aspen 3 1 554981 203691 1427 1682 10 quaking aspen 3 1 555307 203427 961 1683 14 white pine 4 1 555529 203715 1319 1684 10 common buckthorn 3 1 4+3+3 555019 203646 964 1685 12 boxelder 3 1 555511 203423 979 1686 12 red pine 3 1 555033 203636 957 1687 10 white pine 4 1 555052 203720 987 1688 12 northern pin oak 4 1 554981 203636 977 1689 14 red pine 2 1 555107 203748 937 1690 4 blue spruce 3 1 555022 203732 1167 1691 16 paper birch 2 3 5+5+6 554972 203690 1226 1692 11 red pine 3 1 555338 203349 1016 1693 13 Siberian elm 2 4 4+4+3+2 555341 203486 1332 1694 4 blue spruce 3 1 555045 203503 1023 1695 17 red pine 4 1 555638 203411 1000 1696 24 black locust 2 2 14+10 555084 203491 1360 1697 4 red pine 3 1 555102 203640 1004 1698 28 common buckthorn 3 5 7+7+6+5+3 555611 203387 1430 1699 11 quaking aspen 3 1 555040 203528 982 1700 11 northern pin oak 1 1 555537 203702 896 1701 22 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555093 203777 781 1702 6 eastern red cedar 4 1 554864 203816 876 1703 10 eastern cottonwood 2 1 554733 203956 875 1704 20 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554825 203847 898 1705 19 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554822 203843 822 1706 15 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554871 203812 866 1707 20 eastern cottonwood 4 1 554770 203929 904 1708 9 eastern red cedar 3 1 554812 203858 792 1709 6 white pine 3 1 554876 203788 740 1710 24 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554758 204006 743 1711 17 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554651 204070 747 1712 15 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554676 204056 773 1713 17 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554658 204047 900 1714 36 eastern cottonwood 4 2 12+24 554722 203974 768 1715 13 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554867 203809 844 1716 15 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554724 203992 798 1717 11 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554802 203896 855 1718 18 eastern cottonwood 4 1 554743 203988 853 1719 14 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554801 203866 787 1720 10 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554814 203876 845 1721 15 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554760 203966 806 1722 14 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554806 203914 759 1723 10 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554765 203954 877 1724 18 eastern cottonwood 2 1 554692 204070 753 1725 11 American elm 4 1 554842 203843 862 1726 11 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554661 204040 755 1727 14 eastern cottonwood 2 1 554812 203864 777 1728 32 common buckthorn 4 9 4+4+4+4+3+3+3+2+5 554681 204071 828 1729 5 eastern red cedar 3 1 554720 203966 850 1730 15 eastern cottonwood 4 1 554746 203914 770 1731 11 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554817 203895 803 1732 10 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554729 203994 771 1733 15 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554752 203958 816 1734 4 eastern red cedar 4 1 554732 203982 861 1735 13 eastern cottonwood 2 1 554767 203950 795 1736 11 eastern cottonwood 4 1 554807 203864 891 1737 18 eastern cottonwood 4 1 554744 203989 887 1738 12 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554855 203817 789 1739 18 eastern cottonwood 4 1 554854 203820 783 1740 12 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554750 203980 870 1741 16 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554741 203959 835 1742 5 eastern red cedar 3 1 554814 203849 869 1743 14 eastern cottonwood 4 1 554778 203929 751 1744 15 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554812 203851 879 1745 20 eastern cottonwood 4 1 554656 204043 893 1746 15 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554846 203836 807 1747 14 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554870 203823 826 1748 5 eastern red cedar 4 1 554772 203961 858 1749 16 eastern cottonwood 4 1 554756 203918 819 1750 13 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554794 203861 872 1751 11 eastern cottonwood 2 1 554765 203934 838 1752 10 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554818 203845 841 1753 6 eastern red cedar 4 1 554781 203917 831 1754 23 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554770 203901 848 1755 13 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554749 203913 554 1757 10 black cherry 4 1 554606 204133 716 1758 9 red pine 3 1 554640 204257 621 1759 6 red pine 3 1 554622 204084 663 1760 8 red pine 3 1 554687 204205 721 1761 9 red pine 3 1 554589 204128 720 1762 10 red pine 3 1 554632 204075 677 1763 10 red pine 3 1 554610 204077 683 1764 10 red pine 4 1 554593 204115 686 1765 7 red pine 4 1 554596 204107 684 1767 7 red pine 3 1 554598 204190 659 1768 6 red pine 3 1 554595 204112 627 1769 5 red pine 3 1 554583 204123 544 1770 15 eastern red cedar 4 1 554701 204208 549 1771 14 red pine 4 1 554645 204285 605 1772 19 American elm 4 1 554654 204260 665 1773 7 red pine 3 1 554634 204205 714 1774 7 red pine 2 1 554596 204132 642 1775 18 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554625 204086 631 1777 4 red pine 4 1 554556 204143 675 1778 8 red pine 3 1 554698 204199 723 1779 7 red pine 3 1 554599 204120 696 1781 10 red pine 4 1 554615 204229 672 1782 7 red pine 3 1 554621 204116 693 1783 5 eastern red cedar 1 1 554605 204122 706 1784 8 red pine 4 1 554617 204123 594 1785 17 peachleaf willow 1 1 11+6 554599 204098 647 1787 15 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554571 204145 640 1789 13 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554509 204211 765 1790 19 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554705 204196 607 1791 9 eastern red cedar 4 1 554715 203983 612 1792 22 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554637 204204 572 1793 13 boxelder 3 1 6+7 554664 204195 724 1795 8 red pine 3 1 554645 204098 576 1796 11 boxelder 4 1 554637 204071 726 1798 7 red pine 3 1 554582 204201 587 1799 24 eastern cottonwood 4 1 554640 204075 1067 1800 10 red pine 3 1 554515 204174 1022 1801 9 red pine 3 1 555216 203227 1013 1802 10.5 white spruce 3 1 555138 203392 1014 1804 28 black willow 3 1 555173 203457 1009 1805 40.5 crabapple 3 7 3,4.5,8,9,6,4,6 555173 203462 1027 1806 12 red pine 3 1 554956 204409 1059 1807 12.5 red pine 3 1 555149 203385 1061 1808 8.5 red pine 3 1 555265 203275 1063 1809 11 red pine 4 1 555264 203258 1068 1810 7.5 red pine 3 1 555254 203252 1070 1811 9 red pine 3 1 555257 203232 1047 1813 9.5 red pine 3 1 555249 203234 1010 1814 8.5 white spruce 3 1 555215 203327 1036 1816 99 black willow 3 10 15.5 12.5 12 13 7 8 10 13 8 555105 203553 1018 1817 10.5 red pine 3 1 555210 203462 1020 1818 12 red pine 3 1 555140 203403 1026 1819 10.5 red pine 3 1 555132 203407 917 1820 5 Norway spruce 2 1 555153 203389 921 1821 11 peachleaf willow 3 1 554942 203789 1032 1822 8 blue spruce 3 1 554934 203769 927 1823 16 peachleaf willow 2 1 555192 203444 932 1824 8.5 Norway spruce 2 1 554932 203763 960 1825 25.5 boxelder 2 2 9.5,16 554937 203780 962 1826 18 eastern cottonwood 2 1 554979 203745 942 1827 5 Norway spruce 2 1 554976 203738 936 1828 15 blue spruce 4 1 554963 203765 946 1829 18.5 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554969 203785 1049 1830 12 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554979 203747 1039 1831 9 blue spruce 3 1 555249 203318 1024 1832 11 red pine 3 1 555176 203390 1129 1833 8 red pine 3 1 555133 203386 1141 1834 9 red pine 3 1 555300 203286 1131 1835 6.5 red pine 3 1 555258 203285 1133 1836 7 red pine 3 1 555290 203285 1144 1837 9 red pine 3 1 555286 203287 1053 1838 14 red pine 4 1 555264 203293 994 1839 11 Scots pine 3 1 555262 203291 965 1840 5 eastern red cedar 2 1 555099 203650 915 1841 5 Norway spruce 2 1 554975 203732 890 1842 11 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554915 203794 888 1843 12.5 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554858 203841 908 1844 7 blue spruce 3 1 554861 203837 894 1845 15 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554888 203801 905 1846 6.5 blue spruce 2 1 554864 203833 899 1847 9 blue spruce 3 1 554902 203814 912 1848 7 blue spruce 3 1 554884 203828 1050 1849 15 boxelder 3 1 554901 203795 1015 1850 9 red pine 3 1 555255 203317 999 1851 16 black walnut 4 1 555136 203406 1012 1852 32.5 crabapple 3 6 8,4,10,4,3,3.5 555066 203620 1017 1853 12 red pine 3 1 554972 204432 1089 1854 26 boxelder 3 2 19 17 555137 203402 1007 1855 24 crabapple 3 4 4,3,13,4 555277 203259 1078 1856 13 red pine 3 1 554917 204437 1135 1857 6.5 red pine 2 1 555266 203236 1109 1858 26 American elm 3 1 555288 203286 1075 1859 10 red pine 3 1 555337 203237 976 1860 9 eastern red cedar 1 1 555256 203239 1041 1861 56 boxelder 3 4 24 11 8 13 554987 203722 1163 1862 13 eastern cottonwood 2 1 555204 203386 868 1863 11.5 eastern cottonwood 2 1 555359 203277 864 1864 13.5 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554851 203893 873 1865 15 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554843 203900 871 1866 21.5 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554847 203877 929 1867 14.5 peachleaf willow 3 1 554852 203885 878 1868 31 eastern cottonwood 2 2 16,15 554936 203761 860 1869 11.5 eastern cottonwood 2 1 554836 203857 857 1870 16 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554840 203899 842 1871 16 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554833 203903 1019 1872 11 red pine 3 1 554810 203920 1120 1873 11 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555126 203397 1084 1874 9 red pine 3 1 555372 203211 1082 1875 9.5 red pine 3 1 555257 203215 1079 1876 12 red pine 3 1 555266 203218 1158 1877 10.5 red pine 3 1 555270 203241 1156 1878 11 red pine 3 1 555298 203324 986 1879 16.5 green ash 3 1 555297 203332 981 1880 8 blue spruce 2 1 555065 203701 956 1881 29 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555013 203745 971 1882 11 red oak 3 1 554974 203748 834 1883 1883 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555009 203734 840 1884 12 eastern cottonwood 4 1 554788 203939 885 1885 20 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554800 203925 847 1886 6 eastern red cedar 4 1 554867 203841 1003 1887 7 blue spruce 3 1 554833 203939 1117 1888 14 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554990 203768 991 1889 18.5 Scots pine 4 1 555374 203207 998 1890 13 black walnut 4 1 555083 203673 829 1891 18.5 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555083 203644 823 1892 12.5 eastern cottonwood 2 1 554782 203940 851 1893 10.5 eastern cottonwood 2 1 554779 203953 881 1894 11 eastern cottonwood 2 1 554824 203918 951 1895 15 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554857 203854 821 1896 18.5 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554967 203747 1127 1898 10 red pine 3 1 554786 203963 1139 1899 8 red pine 2 1 555303 203286 1104 1900 6 red pine 3 1 555260 203286 1094 1901 5 red pine 3 1 555290 203271 733 1902 14 blue spruce 3 1 555286 203274 739 1903 15 black willow 2 2 6, 9 555068 204229 736 1904 7 blue spruce 2 1 555357 204302 738 1905 6 blue spruce 3 1 555344 204302 734 1906 9 blue spruce 3 1 555352 204302 744 1907 34 crabapple 3 6 6, 5, 5, 5, 8, 5, (CRABAPPLE) 555341 204304 752 1908 10.5 boxelder 3 1 555380 204299 758 1909 10.5 boxelder 2 1 555490 204324 763 1910 42.5 eastern cottonwood 3 2 20.5, 22 555519 204308 762 1911 25 boxelder 3 1 555516 204405 742 1912 8 blue spruce 3 1 555526 204389 761 1913 11.5 boxelder 3 1 555373 204301 756 1914 13.5 boxelder 2 1 555554 204352 764 1915 32 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555528 204314 766 1916 16 boxelder 3 1 555478 204385 767 1917 18 boxelder 2 1 555467 204381 772 1918 13 American elm 3 1 555460 204354 774 1919 18 American elm 2 2 8, 10 555553 204362 775 1920 10 American elm 3 1 555564 204357 778 1921 14.5 American elm 3 1 555560 204352 779 1922 14 American elm 3 1 555575 204372 782 1923 20 red elm 2 1 555538 204393 784 1924 10.5 American elm 2 1 555538 204372 790 1925 18.5 boxelder 2 2 11.5, 7 555526 204378 793 1926 13.5 blue spruce 2 1 555584 204430 1138 1927 5 red pine 1 1 555582 204447 797 1928 24 blue spruce 2 1 555297 203278 805 1929 18 blue spruce 1 1 555610 204431 874 1930 20 boxelder 3 2 10, 10 555615 204388 808 1931 38 white mulberry 3 2 22, 16 555511 204249 809 1932 10.5 American elm 2 1 555629 204382 811 1933 14 American elm 2 1 555618 204378 812 1934 12.5 American elm 2 1 555599 204354 813 1935 12.5 American elm 3 1 555613 204345 814 1936 10.5 American elm 3 1 555629 204348 815 1937 18 boxelder 2 1 555636 204333 817 1938 13.5 boxelder 3 1 555645 204329 820 1939 16.5 American elm 2 1 555587 204337 824 1940 27 boxelder 2 2 12.5, 14.5 555586 204312 825 1941 25 boxelder 2 2 18, 7 555576 204298 836 1942 7 blue spruce 2 1 555576 204291 839 1943 11 black walnut 3 1 555440 204261 843 1944 50 boxelder 2 8 5, 6, 7.5, 6, 6.5, 8, 5, 6 555411 204242 849 1945 8 blue spruce 3 1 555403 204276 852 1946 13 black walnut 3 1 555438 204232 854 1947 12 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555433 204208 856 1948 9 eastern red cedar 2 2 5,4 555430 204211 859 1949 10.5 boxelder 2 1 555443 204202 863 1950 64 black willow 2 7 8, 11, 9, 10, 8, 10, 9 555453 204205 1074 1951 12 red pine 3 1 555464 204217 1098 1952 10 red pine 3 1 555242 203232 882 1953 10 blue spruce 2 1 555298 203264 884 1954 18.5 blue spruce 2 1 555600 204333 886 1955 18 blue spruce 2 1 555606 204303 889 1956 17.5 blue spruce 2 1 555619 204321 892 1957 9 white pine 3 1 555613 204293 895 1958 18.5 boxelder 1 1 555615 204270 897 1959 21 boxelder 1 2 11, 10 555607 204250 901 1960 6 white pine 2 1 555599 204253 902 1961 15 white pine 2 1 555626 204254 903 1962 9.5 white pine 1 1 555606 204247 906 1963 13 American elm 3 1 555624 204254 909 1964 22.5 boxelder 2 2 15.5, 7 555619 204239 910 1965 35 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555615 204244 922 1966 46 eastern cottonwood 3 3 13, 19, 14 555614 204228 923 1967 39 eastern cottonwood 3 3 18, 9, 12 555496 204152 928 1968 11 black willow 3 1 555476 204187 935 1969 10.5 boxelder 3 1 555546 204186 940 1970 11.5 boxelder 3 1 555625 204122 941 1971 10.5 boxelder 3 1 555631 204128 943 1972 11 boxelder 3 1 555628 204108 944 1973 10.5 boxelder 2 1 555622 204105 947 1974 19 boxelder 2 1 555612 204099 948 1975 12 boxelder 3 1 555606 204106 950 1976 13.5 boxelder 2 1 555601 204110 959 1977 25 black willow 3 2 17, 8 555333 203964 963 1978 35 eastern cottonwood 3 2 17, 18 555598 204113 967 1979 13 black willow 3 1 555475 204070 968 1980 11 boxelder 2 1 555513 204056 974 1981 16.5 American elm 3 1 555520 204045 975 1982 15 American elm 3 1 555526 203964 980 1983 27 American elm 3 2 14, 13 555524 203954 983 1984 23 American elm 1 2 15, 8 555546 203870 984 1985 21 American elm 2 2 9, 12 555572 203871 988 1986 22 boxelder 3 2 13, 9 555573 203864 989 1987 25 American elm 2 2 18, 7 555591 203865 992 1988 11 boxelder 3 1 555598 203876 997 1989 30 black willow 3 1 555620 203893 1029 1990 10 red pine 3 1 555645 203979 1152 1991 10 red pine 3 1 555173 203378 1086 1992 12.5 red pine 4 1 555282 203334 1113 1993 25 common buckthorn 3 4 6 9 5 5 555253 203208 1123 1994 10 eastern cottonwood 2 1 555296 203180 1064 1995 10 red pine 3 1 555352 203230 1044 1996 10 blue spruce 2 1 555250 203244 1166 1997 14.5 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555218 203360 1165 1998 13 eastern cottonwood 2 1 555367 203287 1092 1999 8.5 red pine 3 1 555369 203271 1102 2000 15 red pine 2 1 555292 203271 1514 2032 14 American elm 1 2 7, 7 555288 203272 1546 2033 11 American elm 3 1 555590 203840 1548 2034 10 eastern cottonwood 1 1 555455 203875 1589 2035 28 eastern cottonwood 1 1 555490 203867 1576 2036 18 eastern cottonwood 2 1 555405 203941 1544 2037 10 American elm 2 1 555454 204071 1610 2038 25 crabapple 3 5 6,5, 5, 5, 4 (CRABAPPLE) 555446 203858 1529 2039 19 American elm 2 3 8, 7, 4 555064 204079 1534 2040 12 boxelder 2 1 555609 203892 1551 2041 27 American elm 3 2 15,12 555489 203833 1536 2042 12 quaking aspen 3 1 555541 203879 1598 2043 10 quaking aspen 2 1 555484 203836 1522 2044 13 American elm 3 1 555434 203914 1562 2045 35 eastern cottonwood 3 3 14, 12, 9 555618 203851 1574 2046 11 eastern cottonwood 1 2 9, 2 555474 204005 1547 2047 12 American elm 2 1 555456 204083 1519 2048 10 common buckthorn 1 2 5, 5 555498 203874 1566 2049 19 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555602 203849 1557 2050 13 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555471 204012 1579 2051 12 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555481 203976 1560 2053 37 eastern cottonwood 3 3 14,18, 5 555397 203993 1553 2054 26 boxelder 4 2 13, 13 555476 203986 1525 2055 18 American elm 3 3 5,5, 8 555503 203903 1538 2056 11.5 quaking aspen 3 1 555626 203867 1541 2057 45 eastern cottonwood 3 2 25, 20 555477 203839 1505 2058 10 quaking aspen 3 1 555458 203841 1487 2059 8 eastern red cedar 3 1 555598 203799 1467 2060 30 American elm 3 2 20,10 555630 203727 1398 2061 11 quaking aspen 3 1 555603 203517 1447 2062 16 boxelder 2 1 555446 203719 1592 2063 30 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555534 203584 1460 2064 6 eastern red cedar 3 1 555406 203938 1474 2065 11 common buckthorn 3 7 2,2,1,2,1,2,1 555615 203520 1458 2066 3 eastern red cedar 3 1 555635 203582 1502 2067 11 quaking aspen 3 1 555622 203522 1403 2068 13 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555608 203779 1402 2069 11 quaking aspen 3 1 555458 203723 1471 2070 7 eastern red cedar 3 1 555454 203716 1434 2071 10 quaking aspen 3 1 555606 203497 1420 2072 12 quaking aspen 3 1 555500 203649 1432 2073 12 quaking aspen 2 1 555491 203704 1413 2074 10 quaking aspen 3 1 555481 203669 1399 2075 11 quaking aspen 3 1 555463 203669 1478 2076 10 American elm 2 1 555446 203727 1451 2077 15 American elm 3 1 555637 203590 1453 2078 13 American elm 3 1 555620 203531 1491 2079 10 common buckthorn 1 2 5,5 555633 203527 1415 2080 10 quaking aspen 2 1 555637 203725 1441 2081 43 eastern cottonwood 2 1 555478 203688 1424 2082 14 quaking aspen 3 1 555511 203617 1409 2083 17 eastern cottonwood 2 1 555498 203696 1445 2084 17 boxelder 1 2 7, 10, 555471 203699 1406 2085 10 American elm 2 1 555509 203577 1462 2086 8.5 eastern red cedar 3 1 555458 203726 1365 2099 20 common buckthorn 2 7 3, 4, 2, 4, 2, 2, 3 555607 203520 1337 2100 4 blue spruce 2 1 555503 203446 1034 2101 16 boxelder 2 2 10, 6 555405 203550 1037 2102 20 boxelder 2 2 10,10 555167 203378 1042 2103 7 blue spruce 2 1 555157 203367 1046 2104 26 boxelder 3 3 8, 8, 10 555206 203350 1051 2105 11 red pine 3 1 555187 203330 1054 2106 11 red pine 2 1 555205 203297 1057 2107 10 red pine 3 1 555198 203292 1062 2108 10 red pine 3 1 555226 203249 1066 2109 7 red pine 2 1 555210 203245 1071 2110 8 red pine 3 1 555222 203236 1077 2111 9 red pine 2 1 555211 203237 1081 2112 7 red pine 2 1 555215 203223 1083 2113 7 red pine 2 1 555224 203215 1088 2114 8.5 red pine 3 1 555222 203212 1091 2115 7.5 red pine 3 1 555264 203240 1101 2116 9 red pine 3 1 555280 203236 1105 2117 8.5 red pine 3 1 555304 203239 1108 2118 6 red pine 3 1 555291 203235 1237 2119 12 red pine 3 1 555302 203231 1118 2120 25 crabapple 2 3 11,6, 8 (CRABAPPLE) 555357 203465 1121 2121 12 eastern cottonwood 1 1 555310 203170 1124 2122 11 eastern cottonwood 2 1 555367 203221 1126 2123 10.5 eastern cottonwood 2 1 555344 203237 1130 2124 13 eastern cottonwood 2 1 555344 203250 1136 2125 10 eastern cottonwood 1 1 555338 203261 1140 2126 7 red pine 3 1 555327 203259 1149 2127 9.5 red pine 2 1 555297 203290 1168 2128 10 black cherry 3 1 555273 203292 1153 2129 8 red pine 3 1 555324 203329 1162 2130 13 red pine 3 1 555293 203313 1159 2131 9.5 red pine 3 1 555323 203310 1175 2132 9 red pine 3 1 555310 203304 1173 2133 8 red pine 3 1 555322 203321 1195 2134 5 blue spruce 2 1 555321 203325 1197 2135 15 American elm 3 1 555335 203368 1202 2136 13 eastern cottonwood 2 1 555333 203367 1204 2137 18 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555336 203372 1211 2138 15 eastern cottonwood 2 2 10,5 555328 203379 1225 2139 11 red pine 3 1 555344 203392 1213 2140 5 red pine 2 1 555348 203467 1216 2141 13 red pine 3 1 555344 203397 1219 2142 10 red pine 3 1 555342 203405 1221 2143 12 red pine 3 1 555309 203426 1231 2144 9.5 red pine 3 1 555332 203464 1235 2145 8 red pine 3 1 555344 203468 1268 2146 13 red pine 3 1 555364 203464 1260 2147 4 red pine 3 1 555389 203510 1261 2148 14 eastern cottonwood 2 1 555419 203432 1396 2150 11 quaking aspen 3 1 555420 203433 1367 2151 6 blue spruce 2 1 555433 203710 1349 2152 38 Amur maple 3 7 9, 3, 3 9, 5, 5, 4 555602 203432 1343 2153 3 blue spruce 2 1 555419 203515 1334 2154 8 blue spruce 2 1 555422 203539 1385 2155 16 boxelder 3 2 6, 10 555388 203566 1358 2156 10 boxelder 2 1 555526 203512 1377 2157 3 blue spruce 2 1 555457 203458 1381 2158 11 common buckthorn 3 2 5, 6 555591 203468 1368 2159 7 blue spruce 3 1 555558 203474 1371 2160 6 blue spruce 2 1 555631 203457 1379 2161 17 common buckthorn 2 2 9, 8 555621 203443 1380 2162 10 boxelder 2 1 555578 203476 1374 2163 2 blue spruce 1 1 555581 203482 1288 2164 8 white spruce 3 1 555610 203433 1395 2165 10 quaking aspen 3 1 555283 203536 1331 2166 10 boxelder 3 1 555427 203702 1298 2167 20 Scots pine 2 1 555368 203690 1393 2168 11 quaking aspen 2 1 555215 203662 1271 2169 7 red pine 3 1 555425 203699 1387 2170 16 boxelder 3 1 555394 203518 1276 2171 12 red pine 3 1 555479 203573 1273 2172 7 blue spruce 2 1 555375 203518 1339 2173 4 blue spruce 2 1 555384 203519 1304 2174 11 black locust 3 1 555405 203554 1279 2175 10 quaking aspen 3 1 555229 203621 1301 2176 9 Scots pine 2 1 555355 203525 1285 2177 34.5 boxelder 2 4 9, 7, 8, 10.5 555226 203654 1383 2178 11 boxelder 2 2 6, 5 555318 203532 1375 2179 3 blue spruce 2 1 555542 203492 1295 2180 13 Scots pine 2 1 555599 203455 1282 2181 13 boxelder 2 1 555267 203646 1355 2182 12 American elm 2 1 555336 203531 1341 2183 10.5 quaking aspen 2 1 555450 203472 1309 2184 2 northern white cedar 3 1 555412 203550 1293 2185 14 Scots pine 2 1 555155 203629 1258 2186 7 red pine 3 1 555252 203649 1262 2187 14 quaking aspen 2 1 555424 203442 1255 2188 6 red pine 2 1 555424 203429 1249 2189 11 red pine 3 1 555405 203450 1246 2190 12.5 red pine 3 1 555397 203465 1241 2191 11 red pine 3 1 555386 203459 1186 2192 12 common buckthorn 2 4 3,2,2, 4 555364 203472 1170 2193 9 red pine 3 1 555398 203311 1178 2194 16 red pine 3 2 8, 8 555329 203326 1192 2195 16 crabapple 3 2 7, 9 (CRABAPPLE) 555329 203323 1184 2196 16 common buckthorn 2 4 5,4,4,3 555357 203360 1145 2197 8.5 red pine 3 1 555381 203321 1228 2198 4 red pine 2 1 555289 203291 1115 2199 10 red pine 3 1 555345 203470 1112 2200 9 red pine 3 1 555288 203227 1469 2401 4 blue spruce 2 1 555290 203228 1429 2402 10 quaking aspen 2 1 555638 203448 1472 2403 6 eastern red cedar 2 1 555537 203735 1496 2404 11 quaking aspen 3 1 555628 203564 1494 2405 11 quaking aspen 2 1 555530 203700 1490 2406 19.5 quaking aspen 2 2 10 9.5 555539 203689 1506 2407 11 eastern red cedar 2 2 4 7 555538 203679 1516 2408 12 red elm 1 1 555581 203788 1523 2409 16 boxelder 3 1 10 6 555575 203898 1503 2410 10 eastern red cedar 4 1 555577 203877 1499 2411 9.5 eastern red cedar 3 1 555586 203778 1480 2412 10.5 quaking aspen 3 1 555598 203749 1485 2413 10.5 eastern red cedar 3 1 555542 203629 1493 2414 11 quaking aspen 2 1 555574 203673 1477 2415 5.5 eastern red cedar 4 1 555535 203684 1509 2416 10.5 eastern red cedar 4 1 555623 203567 1512 2417 11.5 quaking aspen 3 1 555570 203799 1475 2418 6.5 eastern red cedar 2 1 555572 203816 1501 2419 22 Unknown 4 3 7 7 8 crabapple 555625 203573 1537 2420 11 quaking aspen 3 1 555591 203752 1559 2421 30 eastern cottonwood 4 2 13 17 555554 203819 1563 2422 11 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555464 203982 1565 2423 12 eastern cottonwood 2 1 555449 204000 1543 2424 20.5 crabapple 2 2 10 10.5 crab 555472 204018 1531 2425 10 boxelder 2 1 555458 203798 1527 2426 22 red elm 3 3 6 8 8 555622 203910 1556 2427 4 blue spruce 2 1 555618 203899 1569 2428 11 American elm 3 1 555469 203945 1570 2429 23 American elm 3 2 10 13 555481 204056 1578 2430 19 eastern cottonwood 1 2 12 7 555501 204094 1584 2431 10 eastern cottonwood 2 1 555447 203991 1582 2432 16 eastern cottonwood 2 2 12 4 555433 203986 1581 2433 10 eastern cottonwood 2 1 555437 203991 1577 2434 14.5 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555438 203992 1575 2435 13 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555459 204026 1573 2436 32 eastern cottonwood 3 1 16 16 555474 204062 1585 2437 10 eastern cottonwood 2 1 555485 204083 1590 2438 14 eastern cottonwood 3 1 4 10 555432 203988 1594 2439 18 eastern cottonwood 3 2 9 9 555437 203978 1593 2440 10.5 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555435 203972 1597 2441 14 American elm 3 1 555431 203970 1613 2442 20 crabapple 3 1 6+5+4+5 crab apple 555444 203937 1600 2443 10 quaking aspen 3 1 555071 204105 1611 2445 27 crabapple 3 4 6 5 9 7 crab 555455 203922 1606 2447 10 quaking aspen 3 1 555068 204047 1588 2500 16 eastern cottonwood 3 2 7 9 555355 203937 1609 2608 8 blue spruce 3 1 555432 203997 1524 2609 14 eastern cottonwood 4 1 555075 203886 1608 2628 11 blue spruce 3 1 555636 203848 1572 2629 11 blue spruce 3 1 555070 203894 1586 2630 11 quaking aspen 2 1 555146 204155 1612 2631 32 crabapple 3 5 6+6+5+8+7 crab apple 555349 203938 1528 2632 12 common buckthorn 3 2 6(2x) 555071 204090 1533 2635 14 red elm 3 1 555643 203904 1583 2638 10 quaking aspen 2 1 555543 203843 1554 2639 20 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555329 203944 1540 2643 31 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555375 203736 1530 2644 10 common buckthorn 3 2 5+5 555442 203869 1520 2645 10 common buckthorn 3 1 6+2+2 555632 203908 1564 2648 24 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555638 203814 1561 2649 13 eastern cottonwood 1 1 555380 203735 1545 2650 13 white mulberry 3 3 5+6+2 555387 203736 1542 2651 28 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555435 203823 1518 2652 10 red elm 3 1 555437 203874 1521 2653 12 common buckthorn 3 6 6[2x] 555620 203816 1513 2654 16 red elm 2 3 6+6+4 555639 203838 1508 2655 12 common buckthorn 3 6 6[2x] 555638 203802 1595 2658 11 quaking aspen 3 1 555647 203789 1504 2659 18 common buckthorn 3 9 2[9x] 555345 203975 1550 2660 11 green ash 2 1 555647 203786 1517 2666 18 red elm 3 1 10+8 555444 203789 1549 2667 18 black willow 2 1 555622 203816 1599 2674 7 white pine 3 1 555429 203788 1511 2680 17 common buckthorn 3 7 3(3x)+4(2x) 555352 203992 1558 2685 15 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555628 203790 1591 2690 23 American elm 1 1 14+9 555385 203742 1555 2691 18 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555370 203950 1580 2692 13 quaking aspen 2 1 555381 203738 1552 2693 10 boxelder 2 1 555324 203950 1596 2694 10 quaking aspen 2 1 555383 203761 1526 2695 18 common buckthorn 3 1 2(9x) 555346 203983 1587 2696 11 quaking aspen 2 1 555646 203891 1364 2701 9 red pine 3 1 555353 203938 1203 2702 8 red pine 3 1 555604 203380 1196 2703 6 white pine 4 1 555331 203395 1193 2704 11 white pine 3 1 555324 203405 1299 2705 10 common buckthorn 2 3 5+3+2 555313 203401 1316 2706 17 boxelder 3 1 555597 203330 1464 2707 10 eastern red cedar 3 1 555564 203388 1400 2708 12 quaking aspen 3 1 555638 203494 1033 2709 10 common buckthorn 3 5 2(5x) 555432 203747 1308 2710 10 common buckthorn 3 1 5+5 555155 203359 1421 2711 11 quaking aspen 2 1 555572 203337 1356 2712 10 red pine 4 1 555527 203725 1348 2713 4 blue spruce 3 1 555625 203379 1440 2714 10 quaking aspen 3 1 555604 203395 1488 2715 14 red pine 3 1 555534 203643 1329 2716 6 blue spruce 3 1 555601 203728 1151 2717 9 red pine 4 1 555634 203414 1326 2718 4 blue spruce 3 1 555289 203305 1160 2719 6 red pine 3 1 555620 203419 1128 2720 13 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555328 203333 1194 2721 12 red pine 3 1 555347 203263 1122 2722 13 eastern cottonwood 4 1 555318 203414 1142 2723 9 red pine 3 1 555365 203237 1107 2724 10 red pine 3 1 555299 203298 1040 2725 12 red pine 2 1 555250 203162 1110 2726 8 red pine 3 1 555188 203326 1489 2727 12 Amur maple 2 1 4+5+3 555257 203155 1171 2728 10 red oak 3 1 555607 203727 1085 2729 20 eastern red cedar 3 5 4(2x),3(2x),2(3x) 555348 203349 1106 2730 8 red pine 4 1 555238 203204 1038 2731 12 red pine 3 1 555252 203169 1492 2732 8 eastern red cedar 3 1 555187 203337 1096 2733 11 red pine 4 1 555600 203733 1058 2734 7 eastern red cedar 4 1 555248 203185 1320 2735 6 blue spruce 3 1 555184 203277 1087 2736 9 red pine 3 1 555590 203401 1164 2737 8 red pine 3 1 555243 203193 1303 2738 9 red pine 3 1 555316 203354 1500 2739 16 common buckthorn 3 5 4+4+3+3+2 555615 203359 1212 2740 10 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555641 203783 1425 2741 12 quaking aspen 2 1 555346 203381 1060 2742 7 eastern red cedar 3 1 555518 203710 1210 2743 11 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555184 203273 1412 2744 11 quaking aspen 3 1 555343 203385 1243 2745 10 red pine 3 1 555491 203735 1473 2746 13 common buckthorn 3 4 4+4+3+2 555403 203497 1134 2747 11 eastern cottonwood 4 1 555623 203596 1254 2748 11 red pine 3 1 555347 203271 1495 2749 28 red elm 3 2 8+20 555412 203473 1035 2750 13 red pine 3 1 555584 203691 1114 2751 9 red pine 4 1 555184 203340 1443 2752 13 boxelder 2 2 8+5 555267 203148 1321 2753 5 blue spruce 3 1 555531 203619 1352 2754 31 Siberian elm 3 1 15+16 555592 203405 1190 2755 11 white pine 3 1 555644 203393 1470 2756 12 blue spruce 3 1 555307 203381 1417 2757 13 boxelder 4 1 555643 203467 1313 2758 24 common buckthorn 3 3 11+7+6 555502 203718 1323 2759 6 blue spruce 3 1 555646 203360 1442 2760 13 boxelder 3 1 555602 203411 1248 2761 9 red pine 3 1 555521 203629 1603 2762 13 white pine 3 1 555408 203489 1182 2763 11 common buckthorn 3 1 5+6 555317 204030 1147 2764 4 red pine 3 1 555397 203332 1346 2765 4 blue spruce 3 1 555292 203301 1185 2766 46.5 boxelder 2 6 12.5+10+12+4+4+4 555604 203394 1125 2767 10 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555418 203329 1146 2768 9 red pine 3 1 555359 203240 1325 2769 6 blue spruce 3 1 555294 203302 1328 2770 11 Siberian elm 3 1 555617 203417 1344 2771 9 blue spruce 3 1 555641 203424 1296 2772 15 red maple 3 1 11+4 555624 203411 1200 2773 34 boxelder 2 3 11+11+12 555569 203327 1090 2774 7.5 red pine 3 1 555321 203396 1065 2775 23 common buckthorn 4 9 3(5x)+2(4x) 555243 203186 1073 2776 7 red pine 3 1 555213 203231 1045 2777 11 red pine 3 1 555217 203217 1080 2778 10 red pine 3 1 555197 203301 1306 2779 10 red pine 3 1 555230 203205 1483 2780 11 Amur maple 3 3 4*4+3 555597 203364 1263 2781 10 red elm 3 1 555611 203663 1069 2782 8 red pine 3 1 555443 203406 1072 2783 11 red pine 4 1 555215 203224 1052 2784 10 eastern red cedar 3 1 555218 203224 1174 2785 18 common buckthorn 3 4 6+5+4+3 555181 203296 1137 2786 12 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555346 203338 1103 2787 11 red pine 3 1 555322 203286 1100 2788 8 red pine 4 1 555252 203169 1093 2789 16 red pine 2 2 7+9 555247 203178 1486 2790 18 Siberian elm 3 1 8+4+6 555236 203185 1161 2791 21 boxelder 2 3 10+4+7 555594 203713 1437 2792 10 quaking aspen 3 1 555321 203342 1150 2793 9 red pine 4 1 555528 203679 1312 2794 26 American elm 3 2 19+7 555289 203307 1043 2795 5 red pine 2 1 555642 203350 1055 2796 7 red pine 3 1 555196 203323 1207 2797 12 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555188 203291 1048 2798 13 eastern red cedar 3 1 555334 203385 1188 2799 7 white pine 3 1 555179 203301 1132 2800 25 eastern cottonwood 3 2 11+14 555319 203366 1154 2901 10 red pine 3 1 555349 203270 1172 2902 17 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555288 203325 1177 2903 15 quaking aspen 3 1 555370 203271 1191 2904 13 eastern cottonwood 2 1 555407 203243 1189 2905 12 common buckthorn 4 2 6 6 555416 203361 1187 2906 10 common buckthorn 3 1 555433 203345 1183 2907 14 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555433 203331 1180 2908 22.5 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555387 203268 1181 2909 15.5 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555407 203255 1169 2910 12.5 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555408 203263 1209 2911 12.5 quaking aspen 2 1 555369 203260 1201 2912 10.5 Unknown 3 1 crabapple 555379 203395 1208 2913 15 eastern cottonwood 1 1 555386 203402 1224 2914 13 red pine 3 1 555379 203394 1218 2915 14 red pine 3 1 555344 203459 1199 2916 10.5 eastern cottonwood 2 1 555324 203454 1223 2917 25.5 boxelder 2 2 14 11.5 555391 203398 1215 2918 22 Amur maple 3 3 7 8 7 555332 203458 1205 2919 14 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555345 203444 1227 2920 10 red pine 3 1 555382 203409 1206 2921 11 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555351 203451 1264 2922 12 eastern cottonwood 2 1 555380 203407 1270 2923 10 black walnut 2 1 555439 203427 1230 2924 14 red pine 3 1 555391 203529 1256 2925 14 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555382 203438 1233 2926 10.5 red pine 3 1 555435 203401 1267 2927 10.5 red pine 4 1 555389 203429 1240 2928 12 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555428 203499 1244 2929 33 boxelder 4 3 10 10 13 555424 203428 1234 2930 23 boxelder 3 2 12 11 555403 203403 1253 2931 12.5 quaking aspen 3 1 555390 203436 1251 2932 11 quaking aspen 3 1 555413 203405 1236 2933 10.5 red pine 3 1 555413 203396 1238 2934 7 red pine 3 1 555391 203443 1247 2935 13 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555422 203445 1269 2936 10.5 red pine 3 1 555402 203413 1340 2937 10.5 boxelder 3 1 555404 203524 1372 2938 15.5 red oak 3 1 555448 203622 1336 2939 9.5 red pine 3 1 555572 203417 1452 2940 9 blue spruce 2 1 555395 203598 1468 2941 10.5 blue spruce 3 1 555562 203488 1405 2942 10 American elm 3 1 555625 203441 1277 2943 7 blue spruce 2 1 555458 203775 1439 2944 12 green ash 1 1 555361 203527 1465 2945 5.5 blue spruce 3 1 555504 203577 1456 2946 7 eastern red cedar 3 1 555625 203462 1423 2947 12 quaking aspen 3 1 555585 203479 1422 2948 10.5 quaking aspen 2 1 555520 203738 1444 2949 11.5 boxelder 2 1 555525 203755 1391 2950 14 boxelder 2 1 555537 203556 1357 2951 10.5 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555400 203632 1272 2952 4 blue spruce 2 1 555465 203496 1376 2953 19 boxelder 3 2 11 8 555391 203528 1294 2954 12 sugar maple 3 1 555551 203452 1411 2955 14 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555271 203668 1448 2956 6 eastern red cedar 2 1 555479 203772 1431 2957 10.5 quaking aspen 2 1 555538 203551 1435 2957 6 quaking aspen 2 1 555520 203723 1455 2958 13 blue spruce 2 1 555490 203652 1397 2959 24 boxelder 2 1 555581 203484 1378 2960 9.5 pin cherry 3 1 555421 203652 1463 2961 16 eastern red cedar 3 1 555597 203453 1484 2962 42 eastern red cedar 2 1 8 8 555608 203457 1394 2963 10 eastern cottonwood 2 2 24 18 555583 203681 1388 2964 12.5 quaking aspen 2 1 555423 203635 1418 2965 12 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555447 203582 1366 2966 10 quaking aspen 3 1 555511 203749 1342 2967 12 green ash 1 1 555591 203404 1347 2968 10 boxelder 3 1 555456 203536 1286 2969 9.5 red pine 3 1 555447 203517 1311 2970 12 white spruce 3 1 555361 203597 1300 2971 11.5 eastern red cedar 3 1 branches right at dbh 555277 203521 1359 2972 6 eastern cottonwood 2 1 555303 203629 1369 2973 11 blue spruce 2 1 555464 203488 1361 2974 21 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555626 203457 1408 2975 11 boxelder 2 2 14 7 555461 203499 1287 2976 18 Scots pine 4 1 555476 203778 1291 2977 33 black ash 4 1 555339 203649 1284 2978 13 boxelder 4 3 12.5 12.5 8 555323 203680 1515 2979 11 black cherry 4 1 555348 203575 1426 2980 10 quaking aspen 4 1 555558 203849 1414 2981 21 eastern cottonwood 3 1 555527 203733 1392 2982 20 boxelder 2 3 7 6 9 555486 203762 1310 2983 27 black willow 2 1 555411 203641 1283 2984 10.5 eastern cottonwood 2 1 555177 203600 1459 2985 10 eastern red cedar 2 1 555356 203570 1345 2986 17 boxelder 2 1 555610 203458 1449 2987 13.5 eastern red cedar 3 1 8 9 555441 203539 1416 2988 18 quaking aspen 3 1 555562 203543 1350 2989 18.5 common buckthorn 4 4 3 3 9 3 555505 203758 1384 2990 31 common buckthorn 3 2 11.5 7 555447 203518 1297 2991 7.5 black locust 3 3 12 12 7 555493 203545 1281 2992 10.5 red pine 2 1 555284 203656 1280 2994 5.5 blue spruce 3 1 555359 203563 1278 2995 8 blue spruce 3 1 555374 203541 1353 2996 10 eastern cottonwood 4 1 555364 203532 1370 2997 7.5 blue spruce 3 1 555461 203504 1401 2998 12 quaking aspen 2 1 555628 203459 1274 2999 7 blue spruce 3 1 555434 203738 1275 3000 8 blue spruce 3 1 555382 203529 725 3344 27 crabapple 3 5 Crabapple (6, 4, 4, 8, 5) 555366 203542 293 7549 32 boxelder 4 6 4,5,5,6,6.5,5.5 555071 204356 279 7668 17.5 eastern cottonwood 4 1 554684 204425 8 7948 13 blue spruce 3 1 554708 204430 10 7967 7 northern white cedar 3 1 554712 204868 5 7969 17 blue spruce 3 1 554739 204888 11 7972 15 blue spruce 3 1 554690 204833 7 7973 14 blue spruce 3 1 554790 204910 6 7974 11 blue spruce 3 1 554677 204844 1 7975 14 blue spruce 4 1 554706 204839 0 7976 24 blue spruce 3 1 554674 204793 3 7977 19 eastern red cedar 3 1 554681 204809 2 7977 13 eastern red cedar 4 1 554649 204800 4 7978 11 eastern red cedar 3 3 5, 6, 8 554652 204806 9 7989 15 blue spruce 3 1 554685 204821 554733 204877 FID Tree_Tag DBH_1 Species Condition Stems Notes x_point y_point 12 1001 13 blue spruce 3 1 554794 204912 17 1002 9 arborvitae 2 2 4 554683 204964 13 1003 11 red pine 3 1 554819 204904 16 1020 11 blue spruce 2 1 554694 204967 66 1022 21 boxelder 2 2 7 14 554349 204912 71 1027 11 red elm 3 1 554300 204943 125 1032 22 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554411 204552 97 1033 16 blue spruce 3 1 554578 204850 96 1034 15 arborvitae 3 4 4' 4' 2 554502 204762 99 1035 14 blue spruce 3 1 554551 204850 103 1038 14 blue spruce 2 1 estimated dbh lying down tree 554448 204858 104 1039 11 blue spruce 3 1 554433 204828 101 1040 12 blue spruce 3 1 554456 204859 100 1041 12 blue spruce 3 1 554536 204827 129 1042 17 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554403 204526 120 1044 20 eastern cottonwood 2 1 554390 204582 126 1046 16 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554409 204549 117 1048 17 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554400 204575 123 1049 17 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554402 204551 118 1053 12 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554394 204575 127 1054 27 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554406 204543 122 1055 26 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554399 204555 130 1059 12 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554412 204511 132 1061 27 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554415 204495 131 1063 12 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554411 204498 136 1067 9 quaking aspen 2 1 554379 204461 137 1068 10 quaking aspen 3 1 554375 204449 40 1109 14.5 black willow 1 1 554600 204886 43 1110 14 black willow 1 1 554598 204886 46 1111 13 eastern cottonwood 4 1 554583 204882 49 1112 23 black willow 2 2 8,15 554591 204894 70 1117 27 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554424 204878 72 1118 12.5 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554414 204862 73 1119 26 eastern cottonwood 2 1 554425 204841 75 1121 38 eastern cottonwood 2 2 20,18 554410 204847 78 1122 28.5 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554409 204830 79 1123 37 eastern cottonwood 3 2 29.5,7.5 554423 204825 90 1127 11.5 boxelder 2 1 554361 204771 Impacted Tree List - October 17, 2024 98 1131 16 blue spruce 3 1 554438 204707 105 1133 15.5 blue spruce 3 1 554418 204667 107 1134 34.5 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554392 204648 109 1135 10 boxelder 2 1 554393 204639 114 1137 31 eastern cottonwood 3 2 15,16 554401 204631 115 1138 15.5 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554394 204614 116 1139 15 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554401 204581 119 1140 13 blue spruce 2 1 554425 204593 121 1141 9.5 blue spruce 2 1 554434 204566 124 1142 16.5 eastern cottonwood 2 1 554410 204557 128 1143 10.25 eastern white pine 2 1 554445 204535 133 1144 13.5 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554425 204491 135 1145 56 eastern cottonwood 2 2 26,30 554464 204495 138 1146 11 blue spruce 2 1 554488 204517 139 1147 13 blue spruce 3 1 554504 204496 142 1148 11 boxelder 2 1 554513 204484 145 1150 10.5 boxelder 3 1 554515 204476 147 1151 8.5 boxelder 2 1 554538 204474 153 1152 55 black willow 2 1 554517 204463 162 1153 12.5 boxelder 2 1 554579 204437 165 1154 52 black willow 1 1 554573 204427 169 1155 11 boxelder 2 1 554576 204423 177 1157 11 boxelder 3 1 554603 204433 181 1158 13 black walnut 2 1 554629 204396 186 1159 9 boxelder 2 1 554608 204410 187 1160 10 boxelder 2 1 554599 204402 196 1161 20 boxelder 2 2 10,10 554613 204375 198 1162 8.5 quaking aspen 4 1 554580 204363 199 1163 10.5 boxelder 3 1 554582 204379 201 1164 19.5 boxelder 3 3 7,9,3.5 554546 204356 203 1165 11 quaking aspen 3 1 554489 204350 205 1166 12 quaking aspen 3 1 554489 204346 206 1167 13 quaking aspen 3 1 554467 204368 208 1168 10 quaking aspen 3 1 554457 204391 307 1183 19 arborvitae 3 3 5.5, 6.5. 7 554790 204420 313 1186 32 crabapple 3 6 9, 3, 5, 3, 4, 8 554862 204432 293 1197 20 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554725 204431 245 1199 16 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554682 204430 210 1301 41 crabbapple 3 4 13, 7, 10, 11 crabapple 554812 204720 Impacted Tree List - October 17, 2024 214 1302 12 white spruce 3 1 554836 204758 216 1303 19 blue spruce 4 1 554774 204737 217 1304 15 black spruce 3 1 554747 204747 286 1329 10 quaking aspen 1 1 555064 204661 288 1330 12 quaking aspen 3 1 555066 204654 289 1331 15 quaking aspen 3 1 555068 204647 292 1332 11 boxelder 4 1 555083 204659 296 1333 10 boxelder 4 1 555101 204665 300 1334 11 crabapple 4 1 555123 204673 306 1336 10 quaking aspen 3 1 555138 204678 310 1337 10 quaking aspen 3 1 555164 204682 314 1338 11 quaking aspen 3 1 555197 204682 315 1339 15 quaking aspen 1 2 9+6 555220 204677 316 1340 11 quaking aspen 3 1 555223 204665 651 1342 16 red elm 2 1 554616 204080 438 1343 10 eastern white pine 4 1 555148 204594 415 1351 4 white spruce 3 1 555265 204616 646 1354 11 red pine 3 1 554590 204096 430 1357 3 white spruce 3 1 555193 204597 321 1364 10 quaking aspen 3 1 555244 204676 421 1365 6 white spruce 4 1 555227 204604 319 1366 10 quaking aspen 4 1 555238 204675 320 1367 12 quaking aspen 3 1 555245 204681 325 1368 10 quaking aspen 2 1 555254 204681 460 1369 19 northern pin oak 4 1 555016 204647 631 1370 10 red pine 4 1 554611 204113 318 1373 10 quaking aspen 3 1 555235 204681 424 1374 4 white spruce 3 1 555220 204609 330 1377 11 quaking aspen 2 1 555268 204669 462 1379 20 northern pin oak 4 1 555000 204652 584 1381 16 eastern cottonwood 4 1 554690 204182 656 1384 7 red pine 3 1 554615 204077 426 1386 3 white spruce 4 1 555199 204608 457 1388 10 white spruce 4 1 555044 204598 556 1391 32 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554676 204203 317 1392 12 quaking aspen 3 1 555226 204673 419 1393 5 white spruce 3 1 555240 204608 432 1394 5 white spruce 2 1 555193 204595 593 1397 16 eastern white pine 4 1 554632 204179 Impacted Tree List - October 17, 2024 449 1398 15 American elm 4 1 555084 204530 619 1399 8 red pine 3 1 554591 204106 194 1408 10 quaking aspen 3 1 554409 204432 195 1409 10 quaking aspen 4 1 554449 204436 193 1410 11 boxelder 3 1 554428 204452 200 1416 12 quaking aspen 3 1 554536 204378 202 1417 12 quaking aspen 3 1 554498 204355 207 1418 14 quaking aspen 3 1 554484 204408 204 1419 11 quaking aspen 3 1 554490 204361 442 1420 12 eastern white pine 3 1 555127 204584 433 1421 12.5 eastern white pine 3 1 555175 204595 429 1424 8 eastern white pine 3 1 555188 204596 436 1426 9.5 eastern white pine 3 1 555170 204594 427 1427 11.5 eastern white pine 4 1 555179 204605 443 1428 11 eastern white pine 3 1 555126 204585 439 1429 10.5 eastern white pine 3 1 555123 204582 411 1430 11 American elm 4 1 555254 204631 418 1431 13.5 eastern white pine 4 1 555237 204604 408 1433 11 Scots pine 3 1 555265 204642 417 1434 18 boxelder 2 2 9 9 555250 204615 406 1439 8 Scots pine 2 1 555271 204631 215 1459 13 white spruce 3 1 554837 204737 329 1460 11 quaking aspen 2 1 555254 204678 308 1463 8 red pine 3 1 555175 204649 213 1464 22 white spruce 3 1 554808 204764 211 1466 36 red elm 2 1 554792 204736 326 1467 11 quaking aspen 1 1 555241 204676 304 1468 17.5 boxelder 2 2 8 9.5 555177 204636 282 1469 15.5 white spruce 2 1 555012 204679 285 1471 11 quaking aspen 2 1 555063 204632 212 1473 28 white spruce 3 1 554809 204744 283 1474 13.5 white spruce 3 1 555021 204652 455 1478 21 northern pin oak 4 1 554998 204566 311 1479 12 red pine 3 1 555188 204628 459 1480 17 white spruce 3 1 555032 204616 287 1482 16 blue spruce 4 1 555059 204592 295 1485 12 boxelder 1 1 6 6 555095 204624 446 1486 8.5 eastern white pine 3 1 555126 204590 461 1493 26 red maple 4 1 15 11 555002 204640 Impacted Tree List - October 17, 2024 464 1494 18 northern pin oak 4 1 555005 204505 298 1496 12 quaking aspen 3 1 555135 204631 323 1497 8 eastern red cedar 1 1 555237 204670 209 1500 24 blue spruce 4 2 12, 12 knot at dbh 554821 204718 372 1501 16 boxelder 2 1 554619 204375 376 1502 18 red elm 3 1 554623 204351 384 1503 5 Norway spruce 3 1 554586 204334 386 1504 5 Norway spruce 3 1 554585 204325 387 1505 4.5 Norway spruce 3 1 554575 204321 393 1506 22.5 boxelder 1 1 7 + 9.5 + 6 554507 204290 396 1507 7.5 eastern red cedar 1 1 554493 204282 403 1508 10 pin cherry 2 2 5, 5 554494 204273 412 1510 6 eastern red cedar 1 1 554500 204252 413 1511 33 American elm 2 4 10.5 9.5 10 3 554511 204262 414 1512 28.5 American elm 1 4 8.5 9 3.5 7.5 554516 204268 416 1513 11 eastern red cedar 2 2 7 4 554510 204283 420 1514 5.5 eastern red cedar 1 1 554532 204278 422 1515 3.5 eastern red cedar 1 1 554535 204278 423 1516 10.5 American elm 2 1 554537 204284 425 1517 6 eastern red cedar 1 1 554542 204276 428 1518 7 eastern red cedar 1 1 554541 204276 431 1519 16 red pine 2 1 554551 204275 435 1520 12 black cherry 3 2 7, 5 554549 204269 437 1521 13 eastern red cedar 1 1 554527 204268 440 1522 3.5 eastern red cedar 2 1 554516 204268 444 1523 4 eastern red cedar 1 1 554517 204259 447 1524 9 eastern red cedar 2 2 5, 4 554513 204249 448 1525 5.5 eastern red cedar 2 1 554499 204249 450 1526 5.5 eastern red cedar 2 1 554499 204244 451 1527 4 eastern red cedar 2 1 554492 204244 453 1528 4 eastern red cedar 2 1 554509 204234 454 1529 4 eastern red cedar 2 1 554507 204226 456 1530 3 eastern red cedar 2 1 554504 204228 458 1531 5.5 eastern red cedar 2 1 554499 204226 463 1532 15.5 eastern red cedar 2 2 8.5, 7 554526 204250 465 1533 5.5 eastern red cedar 1 1 554540 204251 466 1534 4 balsam fir 3 1 554561 204306 467 1535 5 Norway spruce 3 1 554578 204304 468 1536 5.5 Norway spruce 3 1 554589 204301 Impacted Tree List - October 17, 2024 603 1538 6 eastern red cedar 2 1 554670 204159 657 1539 12.5 eastern cottonwood 2 1 554707 204160 655 1540 17 eastern cottonwood 2 1 554707 204150 626 1541 18 eastern white pine 3 1 554661 204139 520 1542 29 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554553 204175 621 1544 5.5 eastern red cedar 2 1 554626 204156 633 1546 16 red elm 2 1 554668 204130 585 1550 23 eastern cottonwood 2 1 554707 204176 533 1553 8.5 American elm 1 1 554566 204171 526 1554 28 eastern cottonwood 2 1 554524 204167 591 1556 15.5 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554709 204163 588 1561 15 eastern cottonwood 2 1 554709 204172 643 1562 12 eastern cottonwood 1 1 554693 204143 612 1563 7.5 eastern red cedar 2 1 554633 204165 488 1568 10.5 boxelder 2 2 4,6.5 554622 204261 495 1569 3 eastern red cedar 2 1 554616 204257 542 1573 4 eastern red cedar 3 1 554638 204219 617 1574 7 eastern red cedar 2 1 554634 204154 536 1575 11 red oak 3 1 554567 204182 511 1579 3 Norway spruce 3 1 554581 204228 505 1582 4 balsam fir 3 1 554585 204235 599 1583 7 eastern red cedar 2 1 554673 204175 596 1584 5 Norway spruce 2 1 554682 204179 561 1585 5 eastern red cedar 2 1 554678 204236 498 1586 5 eastern red cedar 1 1 554613 204254 549 1588 32 eastern cottonwood 2 1 554666 204231 554 1589 14 eastern cottonwood 2 1 554673 204225 494 1757 10 black cherry 4 1 554640 204257 654 1758 9 red pine 3 1 554622 204084 560 1759 6 red pine 3 1 554687 204205 602 1760 8 red pine 3 1 554589 204128 659 1761 9 red pine 3 1 554632 204075 658 1762 10 red pine 3 1 554610 204077 616 1763 10 red pine 3 1 554593 204115 622 1764 10 red pine 4 1 554596 204107 625 1765 7 red pine 4 1 554609 204121 623 1767 7 red pine 3 1 554595 204112 598 1768 6 red pine 3 1 554583 204123 484 1770 15 eastern red cedar 4 1 554645 204285 Impacted Tree List - October 17, 2024 489 1771 14 red pine 4 1 554654 204260 544 1772 19 American elm 4 1 554634 204205 604 1773 7 red pine 3 1 554596 204132 652 1774 7 red pine 2 1 554625 204086 581 1775 18 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554695 204194 570 1777 4 red pine 4 1 554698 204199 614 1778 8 red pine 3 1 554599 204120 661 1779 7 red pine 3 1 554635 204077 635 1781 10 red pine 4 1 554621 204116 611 1782 7 red pine 3 1 554605 204122 632 1783 5 eastern red cedar 1 1 554617 204123 644 1784 8 red pine 4 1 554599 204098 534 1785 17 peachleaf willow 1 1 11+6 554571 204145 586 1787 15 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554673 204179 546 1791 9 eastern red cedar 4 1 554637 204204 551 1792 22 eastern cottonwood 3 1 554664 204195 512 1793 13 boxelder 3 1 6+7 554550 204207 662 1795 8 red pine 3 1 554637 204071 516 1796 11 boxelder 4 1 554513 204214 664 1798 7 red pine 3 1 554640 204075 527 1799 24 eastern cottonwood 4 1 554515 204174 943 1805 40.5 crabapple 3 7 3,4.5,8,9,6,4,6 554956 204409 946 1852 32.5 crabapple 3 6 8,4,10,4,3,3.5 554972 204432 941 1855 24 crabapple 3 4 4,3,13,4 554917 204437 247 7668 17.5 eastern cottonwood 4 1 554708 204430 8 7948 13 blue spruce 3 1 554712 204868 10 7967 7 arborvitae 3 1 554739 204888 5 7969 17 blue spruce 3 1 554690 204833 11 7972 15 blue spruce 3 1 554790 204910 7 7973 14 blue spruce 3 1 554677 204844 6 7974 11 blue spruce 3 1 554706 204839 1 7975 14 blue spruce 4 1 554674 204793 0 7976 24 blue spruce 3 1 554649 204800 2 7977 11 eastern red cedar 4 1 554681 204809 3 7977 13 eastern red cedar 3 1 554652 204806 4 7978 19 eastern red cedar 3 3 5, 6, 8 554685 204821 9 7989 15 blue spruce 3 1 554733 204877 Impacted Tree List - October 17, 2024 H:\ARDH\24X136741000\5_Permits\2024-11-04 Submittal\136741_North Heights Plan Review Memo_revised112624.docx MEMORANDUM Date: 11/20/2024 To: David Swearingen, PE From: Jason Malecha, PE cc: Mike Waltman, PE Subject: North Heights Apartments Development Review City of Arden Hills, MN BMI Project No.: 24X.136741.000 This memo summarizes the review of the site development documents submitted by Trident Development, LLC, received on 11/04/2024 and 11/19/2024. General 1. Building setback lines need to be shown on Final Plat as required in City Code section 1120.02 A. 2. Provide a construction traffic control plan. 3. The developer shall obtain all necessary permits required. The list below includes anticipated permits but is not intended to be all encompassing: a. Rice Creek Watershed District Permit b. MnDOT Right-of-Way Permit c. Ramsey County Right-of-Way Permit d. NPDES Construction Stormwater Permit e. City of Arden Hills Right-of-Way Permit f. City of Arden Hills Grading and Erosion Control Permit 4. Monument – Rendering does not match site plans; rendering appears to show extension or modification of signage along CR 96 and/or Snelling Ave. Identify the signage modifications on the site plan. Also, provide sight distance evaluation figure, to demonstrate a lack of site distance issues as recommended by the traffic report. 5. Need a sidewalk connection to CR 96 from the walk in front of the apartment. Attachment M Name: David Swearingen, PE Date: 11/20/2024 Page: 2 H:\ARDH\24X136741000\5_Permits\2024-11-04 Submittal\136741_North Heights Plan Review Memo_revised112624.docx C4 6. It is recommended to identify locations where gutter-out curb is to be installed on the plans, specifically for parking lot islands but also all other areas as applicable. C6 7. Identify the site emergency overflow routes and elevations related to the site, including Stormwater Pond 10. C7.1 8. Provide stormwater calculations and modeling completed that was used to determine pipe sizing, structures, peak stormwater runoff rates, emergency overflow design, underground filtration system design and wet pond dead storage volumes. These calculations should meet the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) modeling requirements. Metropolitan District Waters Edge Building 1500 County Road B2 West Roseville, MN 55113 An equal opportunity employer MnDOT Metropolitan District, Waters Edge Building, 1500 County Road B2 West, Roseville, MN 55113 November 27, 2024 T. J. Hofer Planner City of Arden Hills 1245 West Highway 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112 SUBJECT: MnDOT Review #S24-040 Trident North Heights Apartments SE quad US 10 and CR 96 Arden Hills, Ramsey County Dear Mr. Hofer: Thank you for the opportunity to review the plans for the Trident North Heights Apartments. MnDOT has reviewed the documents and has the following comments: Noise: MnDOT's policy is to assist local governments in promoting compatibility between land use and highways. Residential uses located adjacent to highways often result in complaints about traffic noise. Traffic noise from this highway could exceed noise standards established by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, and the U.S. Department of Transportation. Minnesota Rule 7030.0030 states that municipalities having the authority to regulate land use shall take all reasonable measures to prevent the establishment of land use activities, listed in the MPCA's Noise Area Classification (NAC), anywhere that the establishment of the land use would result in immediate violations of established State noise standards. MnDOT policy regarding development adjacent to existing highways prohibits the expenditure of highway funds for noise mitigation measures in such developed areas. The project proposer is required to assess the existing noise situation and take the action deemed necessary to minimize the impact to the proposed development from any highway noise. If you have any questions regarding MnDOT's noise policy please contact Natalie Ries in Metro District’s Noise and Air Quality Unit at Natalie.Ries@state.mn.us or 651-234-7681. Surveys: The final plat seems to be missing the inside distances on the most northwesterly line. This should be corrected. Please direct questions concerning this comment to Keith Jakober, MnDOT Surveys at 651-775- 0970 or keith.jakober@state.mn.us. Attachment N MnDOT Metropolitan District, Waters Edge Building, 1500 County Road B2 West, Roseville, MN 55113 Water Resources: A MnDOT drainage permit may be required to ensure that current drainage rates to MnDOT right- of-way will not be increased. The drainage permit application, including the information below, should be submitted online to: https://dotapp7.dot.state.mn.us/OLPA/ The following information must be submitted with the drainage permit application: 1) A grading plan showing existing and proposed contours. 2) Drainage area maps for the proposed project showing existing and proposed drainage areas. Any off-site areas that drain to the project area should also be included in the drainage area maps. The direction of flow for each drainage area must be indicated by arrows. 3) Drainage computations for pre and post construction conditions during the 2, 10, and 100 year rain events. 4) Time of concentration calculations. 5) An electronic copy of any computer modeling used for the drainage computations. 6) See also the attached Drainage Permits Checklist for more information. Once a drainage permit application is submitted, a thorough review will be completed and additional information may be requested. Please direct questions concerning drainage issues to Jason Swenson, MnDOT Metro Water Resources at (651-234-7539) or Jason.Swenson@state.mn.us. Permits: In addition to the Drainage permit mentioned above, any use of, or work within or affecting, MnDOT right of way will require a permit. Permits can be applied for at this site: https://olpa.dot.state.mn.us/OLPA/. Please upload a copy of this letter when applying for any permits. Please direct questions regarding permit requirements to Buck Craig of MnDOT’s Metro Permits Section at 651-775-0405 or Buck.Craig@state.mn.us. Review Submittal Options MnDOT’s goal is to complete reviews within 30 calendar days. Review materials received electronically can be processed more rapidly. Do not submit files via a cloud service or SharePoint link. In order of preference, review materials may be submitted as: 1. Email documents and plans to metrodevreviews.dot@state.mn.us. Attachments may not exceed 20 MB (megabytes) per email. Documents can be zipped as well. If multiple emails are necessary, number each email. 2. Files over 20 MB can also be uploaded to MnDOT’s Web Transfer Client site: https://mft.dot.state.mn.us. Contact metrodevreviews.dot@state.mn.us, and staff will create a shared folder in which files can be uploaded. Please send an accompanying email with a narrative for the development. If you have any questions concerning this review, please contact me at (651) 234-7797 or Cameron.muhic@state.mn.us. MnDOT Metropolitan District, Waters Edge Building, 1500 County Road B2 West, Roseville, MN 55113 Sincerely, Cameron Muhic Senior Planner Copy sent via E-Mail: Buck Craig, Permits Michael Kruse, Design Jason Swenson, Water Resources Rabi Pariyar, Traffic Michael Kronzer, Area Engineer Chinou Vue, Right-of-Way Michael Kowski, Maintenance Keith Jakober, Surveys Natalie Ries, Noise Suzy Scotty, Multimodal Amrish Patel, Transit Joe Widing, Metropolitan Council 1 TJ Hofer From:PW Plan Review <PWPlanreview@CO.RAMSEY.MN.US> Sent:Tuesday, December 3, 2024 5:28 PM To:TJ Hofer; PW Plan Review; TJ Hofer Cc:Baar, Dan D; Estochen, Brad M; Flores, Luis; Kemp, Aidan; Churchich, Molly; Mazzitello, John; Profaizer, Rich; Hofschulte, Benjamin P; Richter, Cory Subject:Ransey County Comments: Development Review - City of Arden Hills - PC 24-018, Trident North Heights Apts - PUD, SP, CUP, FP, EV Caution: This email originated outside our organization; please use caution. TJ, Thank you for sending the plans for redevelopment of the Trident North Heights Apartments to Ramsey County for review and comment. Ramsey County provides the following comments below. Luis Flores, Traffic/Access: Given that the County Road 96 and church access intersection is anticipated be signalized as part of the Rice Creek Commons development, this development should present minimal issues to the county’s roadway system. John Mazzitello, Programming: County infrastructure construction on the Rice Creek Commons site is scheduled to begin in spring of 2026. Development access intersection with CSAH 96 will be shared with access to the Rice Creek Commons site to the north. If construction will take place simultaneously, coordination between contractors will be required. Ben Hofschulte, Permitting: Trail connection, extension of culvert, and sanitary connection should be permitted through me. Thank you, Kevin Kevin Roggenbuck (he, him) Senior Transportation Planner Public Works | Economic Growth and Community Investment Office: 651-266-2790 Cell: 612-518-0138 15 West Kellogg Blvd., Suite 210, St. Paul, MN 55102 ramseycounty.us | Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn | e-Updates | Privacy notice From: TJ Hofer <tj.hofer@bolton-menk.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2024 12:02 PM To: PW Plan Review <PWPlanreview@CO.RAMSEY.MN.US>; Roggenbuck, Kevin <kevin.roggenbuck@co.ramsey.mn.us> Cc: TJ Hofer <THofer@cityofardenhills.org> Subject: RE: Development Review - City of Arden Hills - PC 24-018, Trident North Heights Apts - PUD, SP, CUP, FP, EV Kevin, I will mention the concerns regarding review time to Jessica Jagoe, but I think it’s unlikely. There have already been scheduling issues related to this and postponing this any further would lead to a February Council meeting, which be ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart Attachment P Page 1 of 21 PC Agenda Item – 3A MEMORANDUM DATE: December 4, 2024 TO: Planning Commission Chair and Commissioners FROM: T.J. Hofer, Consultant Planner SUBJECT: Planning Case #24-018 – Public Hearing Required Applicant: Trident Development, LLC, Roger Fink Property Location: 1700 Highway 96 West, Request: Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan Review, Final Plat, and Easement Vacation Requested Action Roger Fink, of Trident Development, LLC. (“The Applicant”), is requesting a Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan Review, Final Plat, and Easement Vacation to subdivide and develop an approximately 41.10 acre property that currently contains a place of worship at 1700 Highway 96 West (“Subject Property”). The proposal includes a request for a conditional use permit and a planned unit development to allow for a multiple family dwelling unit in the form of a 119-unit age-restricted apartment. Background 1. Overview of Request The Applicant has submitted a land use application for a Master Planned Unit Development (PUD), Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan Review, Final Plat, and Easement Vacation to subdivide and develop an approximately 41.10 acre property that currently contains a place of worship at 1700 Highway 96 West. North Heights Lutheran Church currently owns the Subject Property and contains a single structure that acts as a House of Worship. The property currently has split zoning with a majority of the site zoned R-1 Single Family Residential District and the northwest of the parcel zoned B-1 Limited Business District. The Subject Property is also within the Shoreland Overlay District based on its proximity to Round Lake. The proposed changes to the site would subdivide the property into two conforming lots, to facilitate construction of a 162,819 square foot, 119-unit multiple family dwelling, and construct additional parking for the existing house of worship. The proposed PUD would be exclusive to the proposed Lot 1, Block 1. Attachment Q Page 2 of 21 The Applicant made an application for Preliminary Plat and Rezoning on July 17, 2024. The Preliminary Plat and Rezoning (PC 24-015) was reviewed by the Planning Commission on August 7, 2024, and the City Council on September 11, 2024. The City Council approved the Preliminary Plat at the September meeting but tabled the Rezoning on based on the need to review the land use application concurrently with the rezoning request. The Preliminary Plat was approved with the following conditions: 1. The Applicant shall submit to the City a land use application for Final Plat within three (3) months after the date of approval of the Preliminary Plat 2. The Applicant shall work with the Rice Creek Watershed District to review future modifications to vacate existing drainage and utility easements as well as proposed newly dedicated drainage and utility easements prior to the submittal of the Final Plat application. Modifications and newly dedicated easements shall be to the satisfaction of RCWD and the City. The three-month deadline for the submittal for the final plat based on the above condition was December 9, 2024. Based on this date, the City extended the review of the rezoning in PC 24-015 to November 12, 2024. The Applicant initially made an application for Master Planned Unit Development (PUD), Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit (CUP), and Site Plan Review in October of 2024, but the application was deemed incomplete. The Applicant applied again on November 4, 2024, with the addition of an application for Final Plat and Easement Vacation, and the application was deemed complete. Due to the meeting schedule of the City, the Applicant has also submitted a waiver for their rights to a timely review as required by Minnesota State Statute §15.99, for the Final Plat and Rezoning applications, until January 13, 2025. The Subject Property has access from County Highway 96 to the north and Snelling Avenue North to the east. Properties around the parcel are zoned R-1 Single Family Residential District and POS Parks and Open Space District and are used for residential uses and houses of worship. 2. History of the Subject Property The Subject Property was developed in 1991 as a house of worship and an addition was approved in 1997. The existing structure used as a house of worship is approximately 91,609 square feet. No current planning approvals exist on the record for the property and the site is conforming based on the zoning ordinance. On September 11, 2024, the City Council approved a Preliminary Plat for the property and tabled a request for a rezoning. The proposed rezoning would zone Lot 1, Block 1, as R-4 Multiple Dwelling District. Approvals 1. Planned Unit Development The Applicant is requesting flexibility through a Planned Unit Development (PUD) to allow for the proposed development to exceed the maximum density, floor area ratio (FAR), and building Page 3 of 21 height allowed in the High Density Residential (HDR) future land use and R-4 zoning district. This proposal involves both the initial Master Plan PUD and the Final PUD. The narrative describes density and lot size, however, does not do so using net acreage as is required in the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The Applicant has provided details in the Architectural Plans (Attachment G) which shows elevations for the proposed building. The narrative submitted by the Applicant further describes the requests through the PUD. The Applicant has stated they are requesting flexibility from building height to as it “will result in a higher quality development allowing for 9- foot-high ceilings in all dwelling units and a 6:12 roof pitch.” The Applicant has stated exceeding the FAR would lead to a reduction of amenity spaces for the residents.” Site Plan Site Rendering Page 4 of 21 2. Conditional Use Permit A “Dwelling: multiple family” (multiple family dwelling) is a conditional use in the R-4 Multiple Dwelling District. Typical factors to consider in the evaluation of the CUP request may be hours of operation, potential noise from the proposed use, lights from vehicles, and on-site traffic. The Applicant is proposing all events will be held inside the building to contain noise within the venue and their request includes supplementary materials related to a security plan and traffic considerations. City Code Section 1355.04 Subd. 3 of the Arden Hills Zoning Code lists the criteria for evaluating a CUP. The Planning Commission and City Council should consider the effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, convenience and general welfare of the owners and occupants of the surrounding land and the community, in general, including but not limited to the following factors: 1. Existing and anticipated traffic and parking conditions; 2. Noise, glare, odors, vibration, smoke, dust, air pollution, heat, liquid or solid waste, and other nuisance characteristics; 3. Drainage; 4. Population density; 5. Visual and land use compatibility with uses and structures on surrounding land; 6. Adjoining land values; 7. Park dedications where applicable; 8. Orderly development of the neighborhood and the City within the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Development Plan for the City. City Code Section 1325.045 Multi-family Dwelling Units Additional Conditional Use Permit Criteria establishes eight additional criteria to consider for a multi-family dwelling unit CUP. A full evaluation of these criteria will be reviewed later in the staff report. 3. Site Plan Review A site plan review is required for new development or additions in any business, industrial or multiple family zoning districts, for PUDs, and CUPs. 4. Final Plat A Final Plat is required to subdivide property. On September 11, 2024, the City Council approved a Preliminary Plat for the property. 5. Easement Vacation Drainage and utility easements exist on the Subject Property that the Applicant is proposing to vacate the delineation of existing easement boundaries and dedicate new easements as part of the final plat. The vacation and new dedication of easements has been discussed with the City Engineer/Public Works Director and has no additional comments. Rice Creek Watershed District has also reviewed and has no additional comments with the easements as presented. Page 5 of 21 Plan Evaluation Chapter 11, Subdivisions 1. Final Plat The Applicant is proposing to plat the Subject Property to adjust the lot lines between the two parcels as shown in the image below. The redevelopment of the site will consist of two buildings that function under shared parking, access, maintenance, and other items. A Final Plat is the final map, drawing or chart indicating the final layout for City approval. The Final Plat (Attachment E) includes the detailed survey description for each lot in the plat plus notes and dedication, recording and approval statements. The Final Plat is the “recorded document” submitted to the county register and must conform to all state laws. Proposed Final Plat Final plats must be substantially consistent with Preliminary Plats. The submitted Final Plat is substantially consistent with the Preliminary Plat approved by the Council on September 11, 2024. 2. Public Use Dedication A. Residential Dedication The City requires all owners or developers, as a prerequisite to approval of a subdivision to convey to the City or dedicate to the public use a reasonable portion of any such proposal for public use as streets, roads, sewers, electric, gas, and water facilities, storm water drainage and holding areas or ponds and similar utilities and improvements, parks, recreational facilities, Lot 2, Block 1 Lot 1, Block 1 Page 6 of 21 playgrounds, trails, wetlands, or open space, in such portions to be approved and acceptable to the City. For a subdivision that results in new dwelling units in excess of eight units per acre, Section 1130.08 of the Subdivision Ordinance permits the City to require the Applicants to dedicate up to twenty percent of the buildable land area in the subdivision or a cash contribution in lieu of land dedication may be required at the discretion of the City at the time the final plat is approved. The cash payment shall be determined based on the fair market of the land that would otherwise be dedicated to the City. In 2024, Ramsey County assigned an estimated market value of $22 million to the Subject Property prior to the subdivision. State Statutes require the City to use the value of the property prior to development when determining park dedication requirements. The Applicant is not proposing land dedication as part of the final plat beyond the standard right-of-way and easements requirements. The Planning Commission should discuss and put forth a recommendation of the City’s discretion for payment in lieu of land dedication for the 10.74 acres as Lot 1, Block 1. B. Park Development The City’s Subdivision Code establishes requirements for Public Use Dedications and Park, trails, and open space land dedication and development. Owners or developers, as a prerequisite to approval of a subdivision to convey to the City or dedicate to the public use a reasonable portion of any such proposal for public use as streets, roads, sewers, electric, gas, and water facilities, storm water drainage and holding areas or ponds and similar utilities and improvements, parks, recreational facilities, playgrounds, trails, wetlands, or open space, in such portions to be approved and acceptable to the City. The Applicant proposed to meet park dedication requirements by a payment of cash-in-lieu of land. In residential subdivisions where a park development fee is required, the City shall apply the fee on a per unit basis. The park development fee is established by ordinance on a regular basis. The per unit fee is currently $6,500.00. The Applicant is proposing the development of a 119-unit building for a park dedication fee of $773,500.00. Chapter 13, Zoning Regulations Review 1. District Provisions (R-4 Multiple Dwelling District) – Section 1320 Trident Development – Lot 1, Block 1 Proposed 10.74 acres Under the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, this site is guided as High Density Residential (HDR) on the land use plan and the applicant has previously requested a rezoning to R-4. Direction 2040 Comp. Plan Land Use Zoning Existing Land Uses North TRC RMU – Retail Mixed Use TRC NR-3 – Residential TRC NR-4 – Residential POS – Parks and Open Space CD – Conservation TRC RMU – Retail Mixed Use TRC NR-3 – Residential TRC NR-4 – Residential POS – Parks and Open Space CD – Conservation R-1 – Single Family Residential House of Worship Vacant South POS - Park & Open Space POS – Parks and Open Space Park East PI – Public and Institutional LDR - Low Density Residential R-1 – Single Family Residential Single Family Dwellings Page 7 of 21 West LDR - Low Density Residential R-1 – Single Family Residential Single Family Dwellings The Future Land Use designation is for townhome and multi-family residential land uses providing for densities of nine to twelve units per acre. The proposed site plan is attached as Attachment D. Multiple family dwellings require a CUP in the R-4 district. The table below provides the performance standards for the R-4 District and the preliminary analysis for the proposed development of the principal structure and the site: Ordinance Requirements R-4 District Standards Proposed Lot 1 Maximum Floor Area Ratio 0.3 0.347 Maximum Structure Coverage 25% 12% Maximum Impervious Surface 35% 26% Minimum Landscape Lot Area 65% 74% Minimum Front Yard Setback 40 feet 96.9 feet Minimum Rear Yard Setback 30 feet 86.5 feet Minimum Side Yard Setback 10 feet (min)/ 15 feet (total) 65.6 feet/ ~ 474 feet Minimum Lot Area (per dwelling unit) 3,630 sq. ft. 468,025 sq. ft. 3,933 sq. ft. Maximum Building Height 35 feet ~ 38 feet PUD & SUP Maximum Dwelling Unit Density Per Net Acre 12 units 13.9 units A. Density, Maximum Dwelling Units – Flexibility Requested The High Density Residential (HDR) future land use is established in the Comprehensive Plan to be, “providing for densities of nine to 12 units per acre.” The Applicant has submitted a narrative that addresses lot size, but not density. When determining density for a proposed development net acreage for the site must be used. Net residential acreage is calculated by subtracting wetlands, water bodies, public parks, arterial streets, and identified natural resources that are protected by ordinance from gross acres. The Subject Property does not contain water bodies, public parks, arterial streets, or identified natural resources that are protected by ordinance from gross acres, but does include multiple wetlands. Proposed Lot 1, Block 1 contains three wetlands as shown on the submitted Wetland Delineation and Civil Plans. The Wetland Delineation notes the size of these wetlands. Wetland Number Acres (on site) Wetland 8 1.40 Wetland 9 0.40 Page 8 of 21 Wetland 10 0.40 Density Calculation Total Site Acreage 10.75 Total Wetland Acreage 2.2 Net Acres 8.55 Proposed Units 119 Density (Units/Net Acres) 13.9 Approximately 9.9 net acres would be required for a 119-unit development. As proposed, developing the site with 119 units required flexibility from the density maximum established in the Comprehensive Plan. On July 11, 2022, the City Council approved Comprehensive Plan Amendments to Chapter 6 which included amending Section 6.4.10, Development Capacity and Net Residential Density to allow an increase in the maximum housing unit density as part of a Planned Unit Development. The Subject Property is part of the boundaries as described in Section 6.4.10 which states “Land guided for High Density east of Interstate 35W, south of County State Aid Highway 96, west of Snelling Avenue North and north of interstate 694 density may be increased by up to 100% through the use of the Planned Unit Development (PUD) process if the intent is to meet the goals of the Comprehensive Plan.” Furthermore, Chapter 6 also outlines how the City Code includes PUD regulations that allow for a higher quality and compatible development of property by encouraging reasonable flexibility from applicable standards, including at higher densities than would be allowed under the underlying zoning district and/or guided land use designation. B. Maximum Floor Area Ratio – Flexibility Requested A floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.3 is permitted within the R-4 zoning district. The Applicant is requesting flexibility through a PUD to construct a building that would create a FAR of 0.35 for proposed Lot 1. C. Maximum Building Height – Flexibility Requested Section 1305.04 of the City Code defines building height as “the vertical distance from the average elevation of the grade along a face of a building to the highest point of the roof surface of flat roofs, the deck line of mansard roofs, or the average height between the eaves and the highest ridge of gable, hip, or gambrel roofs.” These measurements are illustrated in the drawing below. The proposed building has a gable roof, with a height of 38 feet as measured according to city code. A maximum building height of 35 feet is permitted within the R-4 zoning district. The Page 9 of 21 Applicant is requesting flexibility through a PUD to construct a building that would be approximately 38 feet high on proposed Lot 1. 2. District Provisions (R-1 Single Family Residential District) – Section 1320 North Heights Lutheran Church – Lot 2, Block 1 Proposed 30.36 acres The North Heights Lutheran Church site, which would be described as Lot 2, Block 1, of the plat, will be altered as part of the subdivision. The subdivided lot must still meet the standards established in the City Code. The table below provides the performance standards for the R-1 District and the preliminary analysis for the proposed development of the site: Ordinance Requirements R-1 District Standards Proposed Lot 2 Maximum Floor Area Ratio 0.3 0.06 Maximum Structure Coverage 25% 7% Maximum Impervious Surface 35% 35% Minimum Landscape Lot Area 65% 65% Minimum Front Yard Setback 40 feet No Change Minimum Rear Yard Setback 30 feet No Change Minimum Side Yard Setback 10 feet (min)/ 25 feet (total) 113.1 feet Minimum Lot Area (per dwelling unit) 14,000 sq. ft. 1,322,416 sq. ft. Maximum Building Height 35 feet No Change 3. Design Standards – Section 1325.05 and 1325.055 A. Building Positioning – Meets Requirement The City Code requires setbacks for structures on lots. The proposed building for Lot 1 meets the established standards. The existing building for Lot 2 is conforming and will remain conforming with the proposed subdivision. B. Exterior Materials – Meets Requirement Buildings within the R-4 zoning district do not have requirements regarding exterior materials like business districts do. Section 1325.05 Subd. 6 Aesthetics requires proposed design, scale, massing, materials, height, and other aspects of the subject matter of any permit requested be evaluated by the Planning Commission and the Council with respect to structures and properties in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission and the Council shall consider, prior to the issuance of any permit, whether the appearance of the subject matter is so at variance with the structures and properties in the surrounding area as to cause a substantial depreciation in the property values in the surrounding area or to unreasonable detract from the appearance of the area or the city as a whole The Applicant is proposing a mix of metal lap siding, vertical metal siding, brick veneer, vinyl patio doors and windows, metal accent features, and asphalt shingles. Page 10 of 21 Renderings C. Lighting – Meets Requirement The Zoning Code requires that direction of lighting to be arranged away from adjoining lots and public streets, that lighting sources be concealed or hooded, and intensity of lighting any light or combination of lights shall not cast light that exceeds a meter reading of one foot candle on the travel lanes of adjoining public streets or 0.4 foot candles on adjoining residential property. For non-residential uses visible from residentially zoned property, the Code limits lighting to a maximum of 25% percent of the facade visible from such residential property to be illuminated by direct lighting from spotlights or flood lights. Exterior Lighting Examples Page 11 of 21 The proposed lighting plan includes wall mounted building lighting, flush-mounted lights, and light poles that are downward cast with 90-degree cut offs. The Applicant is also proposing pole lights placed throughout the parking lot. The Applicant has submitted a photometric plan that shows the submitted lighting package consistent with the City Code. D. Landscaping – For Review Section 1320.06 – District Requirements Chart of the City Code requires all uses maintain a landscaped area of 65%, or 304,216 square feet for the Subject Property, in the R-4 District. Landscaping can consist of naturally vegetated areas, wetlands, ponding areas, planting beds, ground cover and mulch areas (vegetative, rock, bark chip, etc.), decorative walkways and areas not to exceed fifteen percent (15%) of the required landscape lot area, outdoor recreation areas, and plantings such as trees, grass, shrubs. The Applicant is proposing a landscape lot area of approximately 74% percent or 345,450 square feet. The Applicant is proposing approximately 57,460 square feet of plantings, with the rest of the area to be left natural or part of wetlands and ponding areas. At least 10% or 5,746 square feet of the total landscaped area shall be covered with perennials and/or shrubbery. The Applicant is proposing perennial and/or shrubbery of approximately 23.63% or 13,331 square feet. Planting islands shall occupy 10%, 28,809 square feet for the Subject Property, of the parking area. The landscaping plans show 14 proposed parking islands for a total of 43,617 square feet of islands. Additionally, per City Code, planting islands shall be edged with concrete curbs. Parking lot planting islands shall be a minimum of 150 square feet in area, be of appropriate width and length, and include at least one tree to meet the requirements of this ordinance. The submitted plans reflect these requirements. The site contains approximately 21,982 caliper inches of significant trees. Section 1325.055 Subd. 5 allows for the removal of fewer than ten (10) percent of the caliper inches of significant trees on the property without requiring mitigation, 2,198 for the Subject Property. The Applicant proposes removing 3,702 caliper inches of trees, meaning the Applicant is responsible for mitigation of 1,504 caliper inches removed above 10 percent. Per Section 1325.055 Subd 6, the number of caliper inches of trees required for replanting is determined at a rate of 1:2 or one inch replaced for every two inches lost. The Applicant intends to replace the 752 caliper inches required based on the total inches removed and the rate of replacement. Tree Mitigation Calculation Caliper Inches of Trees A Existing Significant Trees 21,982 B 10% of Existing Significant Trees 2,198 C Proposed Significant Tree Removal 3,702 D Caliper Inches in excess of 10% (C-B) 1,504 E Required Replacement Trees (D x 0.5) 752 F Proposed Replacement 752 The minimum tree size at time of planting shall be 2.5 caliper inches for deciduous trees and the percentage of trees planted of various caliper inches shall meet the requirements of the table Page 12 of 21 provided. The landscaping plan currently states trees of two caliper inches will be planted on the site. The submitted plans show plantings within drainage and utility easements. These plantings must be moved outside of the easements. The City Code requires a minimum of one tree be provided along the right-of-way for every 50 feet of public street frontage. The Subject Property survey shows the northern property along Both the frontages along Conty Highway 96 and Snelling Avenue North are both heavily vegetated. Additional frontage along State Highway 10 is currently less vegetated and will be impacted by construction. The Applicant is proposing 38 trees along 398 feet of abutting right- of-way that will be disturbed. E. Screening – Meets Requirements Under Section 1325.05, Subd. 4, requires when any non-residential use in residential districts by Conditional Use Permit or PUD, such as houses of worship and residential facilities over six adjoins or is located across the street from any single- or two-family residential lot, screening is required. All parking, loading service, utility, and outdoor storage areas shall be screened and buffered from all public streets and adjacent differing land use. Screening exists for the house of worship use on proposed Lot 2 and will not be altered. Existing vegetation and proposed landscaping are proposed for screening from adjacent residential uses for the proposed multiple family dwelling. Trash enclosures will be contained within the underground parking lot, under the proposed building. F. Snow Storage – For Review Snow storage has not been indicated on the submitted plans. Snow storage areas shall be provided so that the number of parking spaces is not reduced below the minimum required. The City may initiate proceedings to require that snow be hauled off the site if parking and circulation problems related to inadequate snow-removal occur. G. Parking Setbacks – Meets Requirements The City Code requires off-street parking spaces to be located a minimum of 20 feet from the right-of-way of any public street. The Applicant has satisfied this requirement and has an approximately 119-foot setback from the ROW along County Highway 96. Proposed parking on the eastern part of the Subject Property is approximately 384 feet from Snelling Avenue North where existing parking is approximately 165 feet from the ROW. For side and rear setbacks, off- street parking spaces are required to be located a minimum of five feet from rear and side lot lines. The plans indicate parking spaces will be setback 10 feet from the adjacent property northeast of the site. Plans indicate that the Applicant would satisfy the requirements for off- street parking space setbacks. H. Number of Parking Stalls – Meets Requirements Per City Code 1325.06, there are general categories that determine the number of parking spaces that would need to be provided. Multiple family dwellings require 1.1 per efficiency and 1 bedroom dwelling units; 2 for each 2+ bedroom dwelling units and house of worships require 1 for every 3 seats (based on design capacity). In addition to these standards, multiple family dwellings that require a CUP shall provide a minimum of one enclosed parking stall per dwelling unit. Enclosed parking structures shall be attached to at least one of the principal structures to Page 13 of 21 which parking is provided. With 119 units, the multiple family dwelling is required to provide 200 stalls and 119 of those stalls must be in an attached enclosed parking structure. The Applicant is proposing 254 parking stalls for the multifamily dwelling use, 150 of which would be located in the underground parking facility. Units Unit Counts Required Stalls Number of Stalls Provided Parking Surplus 1-bedroom units (1.1 parking stalls) 43 48 254 (150 underground) 54 2 or more bedrooms (2 parking stalls) 76 152 Total 119 200 The house of worship currently has capacity for 2,320 seats, for a parking requirement of 774 parking stalls. As a result of the subdivision of land, the house of worship will lose parking and as such the Applicant is proposing to construct an additional 82 parking stalls on the site as part of the Site Plan Review and PUD review. The house of worship is proposed to have 866 parking stalls. Plans indicate that the Applicant would satisfy the requirements for off-street parking stalls. I. Traffic Study and Site Circulation – For Review The site currently has two access point to the Subject Property along County Highway 96 and Snelling Avenue North. No changes are proposed to the current configuration. As part of the application, the Applicant has provided a Traffic Review Memo (Attachment J) which references the future intended use of proposed Lot 1, Block 1. The memo notes that the overall impact of the intended use on area roadway capacity is expected to be minimal and that no significant issues are expected as a result of the proposed development from a traffic capacity perspective. In response to prior concept review comments from the City Council, the Applicant has shown in the renderings that the access to County Highway 96 will be identified as “Left Turn Only” with signage showing “No Right Turn” movements to reinforce traffic patterns towards Highway 96. A condition of approval is included below that the submitted plans be revised to show the markings and signage on the plans. Access to County Highway 96 from Submitted Renderings Page 14 of 21 Access to right-of-way for proposed Lot 1, Block 1, will be shared with the existing access for proposed Lot 2, Block 1. A condition of approval is included below to require that a shared access agreement is recorded before the final plat can be recorded. The Applicant has submitted exhibits that detail how emergency vehicles and waste collection vehicles would traverse the site. The submitted plans indicate that the Applicant would satisfy the requirements for site circulation. Concerns regarding noise from the surrounding highways impacting future residents within the development were identified as a concern as part of previous reviews. The Applicant has submitted a Traffic Noise Assessment (Attachment K) has been prepared by David Braslau Associates, Inc. The assessment is attached to this report. The summary of findings within the report found that a higher level of glazing would be required on windows on the proposed multifamily dwelling to meet Minnesota noise rules. The assessment also analyzed the impact of sound on surrounding residential uses. This analysis found changes to surrounding properties that would not be easily detectable and no suggestions were made for this change. J. Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation – For Review The Applicant has stated that this project will include pedestrian trails on the northwest side of the proposed apartment building. Pedestrian trails will be connected to the regional county trail system located along the south side of County Highway 96. In addition, concrete walkways will be constructed internal to the site allowing pedestrian movement to and from the church building. The Applicant is proposing a bicycle parking as part of this development within the underground parking. The submitted Architectural Plans show 72 bicycle spaces. City Code requires that multifamily dwellings that require a CUP to provide enclosed bicycle parking at a rate of 0.5 spaces for every dwelling unit, for a total of 59.5 stalls. The submitted plans indicate that the Applicant would satisfy the requirements for pedestrian and bicycle circulation. K. Freestanding Signs – Nonconforming, Flexibility Requested The Subject Property is in Sign District 3 (i.e. all residential properties zoned R-3 and R-4) for the newly created Lot 1 and Sign District 2 (i.e. all non-residential uses in the R-1 through R-4) for the existing Lot 2. The Applicant has indicated that there will be no signs located on Lot 1 and that the existing sign located near the access to County Highway 96, and located on Lot 2, will be modified and expanded to include a sign to serve the use of Lot 1. Properties in Sign District 2 are allowed one freestanding sign with 48 square feet in copy area and not exceeding six feet in height. Freestanding signs shall be located at least five feet from any property line. Sign copy area is defined as the area in square feet of the smallest rectangle, circle, or triangle that contains the sign copy. Signs in Sign District 2 may be lit by external or internal illumination only. The existing sign that will be modified is an existing sign with internal illumination that will be modified. The applicant has indicated that the sign will be expanded to the south. The setback from the property line will be reduced due to the dedication of right-of-way but will still be consistent with the City Code. Page 15 of 21 Limited information regarding the sign has been submitted. If any deviation from the established standards occurs, an additional review may be required. Proposed Freestanding Sign 4. Design Standards – Section 1325.045 Multi-family Dwelling Units Additional Conditional Use Permit Criteria A. Minimum Unit Size – Meets Requirements The City Code sets minimum unit size based on the type of unit within the multi-family dwelling. The Applicant is proposing one- and two-bedroom units. One-bedroom units must be a minimum of 700 square feet and two- bedroom units must be a minimum of 950 square feet. The Applicant is proposing a minimum unit size of 800 square feet for one-bedroom units and 975 square feet for two-bedroom units. B. Security Plan – For Review The Applicant has detailed a security plan in their narrative. Security will include surveillance cameras in common areas, exterior areas, surface lots, and underground garages. Controlled access will be used for entrances into the building. Exterior portions of the site will be illuminated through the fixtures shown on the lighting plan. C. Lighting Plan – Meets Requirements Lighting was reviewed above and met the standards within Section 1325.05. D. Parking – Meets Requirements A minimum of one enclosed parking stall shall be provided per dwelling unit. Enclosed parking structures shall be attached to at least one of the principal structures to which parking is provided. Parking was reviewed above and the plans appear to meet the requirements established in the City Code. E. Common Area – Meets Requirements Common area devoted to recreation or leisure activities shall be provided. Common area must include a combination of both indoor and outdoor space. Page 16 of 21 The Applicant states 15 features and amenities in their narrative that are both indoor and outdoor. These include an indoor community room and an outdoor patio. F. Efficiency Apartments – Meets Requirements The number of efficiency units in a multiple dwelling shall not exceed fifteen (15) percent of the total number of apartments. The Applicant is not proposing any efficiency apartments. G. Bicycle Parking – Meets Requirements Enclosed bicycle parking shall be provided at a rate of 0.5 spaces for every dwelling unit. Bicycle parking was reviewed above and the applicant is providing 72 bicycle parking stalls for a ratio of 0.6 stalls per unit. H. Window Coverings– For Review All windows which are visible to the outside shall be provided with window treatments. Window treatments shall be consistent throughout each multi-family dwelling structure or development. The Applicant has not provided any information regarding window coverings. Compliance with the requirements for window coverings will be done as part of an inspection of the building once construction has begun. 5. Procedural Requirements for Specific Applications – Section 1355.04 A public hearing for a CUP and PUD request is required before the request can be brought before the City Council. The applicant or its representative shall be given the opportunity to appear before the Planning Commission to answer questions or give explanations regarding the proposal. Upon completion of the public hearing and its study and consideration of the application, the Planning Commission shall submit its written report, containing its findings, conclusions, and recommendations as to the application, to the City Council. Plan Evaluation Summary The table below provides the performance standards for the R-4 District and the preliminary analysis for the proposed development. Requirements where the submitted plans are inconsistent with City Code and require revision are highlighted in grey. Requirements where the Applicant has requested flexibility are highlighted in orange: Ordinance Requirements R-4 District Standards Proposed Development Minimum Lot Area (per dwelling unit) 3,630 sq. ft. 468,025 sq. ft. 3,933 sq. ft. Maximum Floor Area Ratio 0.3 0.35 Maximum Building Height 35 feet ~ 38 feet Maximum Structure Coverage 25% 12% Minimum Landscape Lot Area 65% 74% Minimum Front Yard Setback 40 feet 96.9 feet Minimum Rear Yard Setback 30 feet 86.5 feet Minimum Side Yard Setback 10 feet (min)/15 feet (total) 65.6 feet/ ~ 474 feet Page 17 of 21 PUD & SUP Maximum Dwelling Unit Density Per Net Acre 12 units 13.9 units Minimum Parking Requirements (Dwelling, multiple family) 1.1 per efficiency and 1 bedroom dwelling units; 2 for each 2+ bedroom dwelling units (Total Required- 195 spaces) 254 stalls Off-Street Parking Setbacks 20 feet from ROW 10 feet from property lines 119 feet from ROW 10 feet from property lines Lighting Not to exceed one foot candle on the travel lanes of adjoining public streets 0.1-foot candles shown on photometric plan Screening/Fencing Screened from residential uses Vegetative screening along western boundaries Landscaping - Planting Islands 10% of parking area 15% of parking area Landscaping – Tree Mitigation 752 caliper inches required for replacement 752 caliper inches proposed for replacement Trees located in D&U easements Trees >2.5 caliper inches Landscaping – Boulevard and Island Trees Boulevard Trees – 39 Island Trees – 14 Boulevard Trees – 38, Existing Vegetation Island Trees – 24 Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation Provide circulation plan and bike rack Bicycle parking provided for residents Additional Review Building Official The Building Official has reviewed the plans and has no additional comments at this time. A Building Permit will be required prior to any construction taking place. Public Works Director/City Engineer The Public Works Director/City Engineer has reviewed the plans. A memorandum has been prepared by the Public Works Director/City Engineer and included as Attachment N. Fire Marshal The Fire Marshal is currently reviewing the plans. No additional conditions have been included at this time Minnesota Department of Transportation MnDOT did not provide comments at the time of writing this report. United States Fish and Wildlife Service FWL did not provide comments at the time of writing this report. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources The Area Hydrologist stated that the plans appear to be consistent with the requirements, including those for open space and density, in Minnesota rules for residential PUDs in shoreland. Findings of Fact Planned Unit Development and Conditional Use Permit Findings: Page 18 of 21 1. The property located at 1700 Highway 96 West is designated for High Density Residential uses on the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. 2. New building construction or site modification identified requires the submittal of a Site Plan Review application prior to construction. 3. For proposals for new construction, redevelopment of a site, and significant modifications to existing sites a PUD is required 4. The PUD process allows for flexibility within the City’s regulations through a negotiated process with a Developer. 5. The Applicant has proposed a Site Plan Review, Master and Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Final Plat, and Vacation in order to construct a 119-unit age-restricted apartment. 6. The Applicant has proposed a Master and Final Planned Unit Development for the development of one approximate 162,819 square foot multiple family dwelling on the Subject Property. 7. The Applicant has proposed additional improvements to the proposed Lot 2, Block 1, to construct additional parking and install landscaping for the existing house of worship use. 8. The Master and Final Planned Unit Development generally conforms to the requirements of the City Zoning Code and design standards. 9. Where the plan is not in conformance with the City Code, the Applicant has requested flexibility. 10. Flexibility through the PUD process has been requested in the following areas: density, floor area ratio, and building height. 11. A public hearing for a Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, and Conditional Use Permit request is required before the request can be brought before the City Council. Options and Motion Language Staff have provided the following options and motion language for this case the Planning Commission should consider providing additional findings of fact as part of the motion to support their recommendation for approval or detail. • Recommend Approval with Conditions: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 24-018 for a Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan Review, Final Plat, and Easement Vacation for a Multiple Family Dwelling at 1700 Highway 96, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by the conditions in the December 4, 2024 Report to the Planning Commission: 1. The project shall be completed in accordance with the submitted plans as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the Community Development Director, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. 2. The Conditional Use Permit and Master Planned Unit Development and Final Planned Unit Development shall expire one year from the date of City Council approval unless a building permit has been requested or a time extension has been granted by the City Council. The City Council may extend the expiration date of such approval upon written application by the person to whom the approval was granted. Page 19 of 21 3. A violation of any condition set forth in the permit shall be a violation of this Code and shall be cause for revocation of the permit. 4. Prior to the release of the Final Plat for recording, the Applicant shall enter into a Development Agreement. 5. The Final Plat shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a building permit. 6. A Master and Final PUD Development Agreement shall be prepared by the City Attorney and subject to City Council approval for the Development. The Master and Final PUD Development Agreement shall be fully executed prior to the issuance of building permits. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a landscape financial security equal to 125% of the cost of the landscaping to be installed on the site shall be submitted. The Applicant must submit a detailed cost estimate for the landscaping so staff can determine the final amount. Landscape financial security shall be held for two full growing seasons. For any landscaping that is not in accordance with the approved landscaping plan at the end of two growing seasons, the Developer shall replace the material to the satisfaction of the City before the guarantee is released. Where this is not done, the City, at its sole discretion, may use the proceeds of the performance guarantee to accomplish performance. 7. A Grading and Erosion permit shall be obtained from the city’s Engineering Division prior to commencing any grading, land disturbance or utility activities. The Applicant shall be responsible for obtaining any permits necessary from other agencies, including but not limited to, MPCA, Rice Creek Watershed District, MnDOT and Ramsey County (i.e., ROW or access) prior to the start of any site activities. 8. The final plans shall be subject to approval by the City Engineer, Building Official, and Fire Marshal prior to the issuance of a grading and erosion control permit and shall be consistent with the memorandum from the City Engineer. 9. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the final plans shall show markings and signage to identify access off the site onto County Highway 96 as “Left Turn Only” with signage showing “No Right Turn.” 10. Final landscaping plans shall be revised to relocated trees outside of any drainage and utility easements and shown with trees with a minimum caliper inch of 2.5 inches. 11. Final grading, drainage, utility, and site plans shall be subject to approval by the Public Works Director, City Engineer, and Community Development Director prior to the issuance of a grading and erosion control permit or other development permits. 12. Upon completion of grading and utility work on the site, a grading as-built and utility as-built shall be provided to the City for review. 13. Heavy duty silt fence and adequate erosion control around the entire construction site shall be required and maintained by the Developer during construction to ensure that sediment and storm water does not leave the project site. 14. The Applicant shall be responsible for protecting the proposed on-site storm sewer infrastructure and components and any existing storm sewer from exposure to any and all stormwater runoff, sediments and debris during all construction activities. Temporary stormwater facilities shall be installed to protect the quality aspect of the proposed and existing stormwater facilities prior to and during construction activities. Maintenance of any and all temporary stormwater facilities shall be the responsibility of the Applicant. 15. All light poles, including base, shall be a maximum of 25 feet in height and shall be shoebox style, downward directed, with high-pressure sodium lamps or LED and flush lenses. Page 20 of 21 16. All rooftop or ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be hidden from view with the same materials used on the building in accordance with City Code requirements. 17. A separate sign permit shall be required for all signs on the site. 18. Any future trash enclosures shall utilize gates and be constructed on three sides using the same materials and patterns used on the building. Locations shall be approved by the Planning Department. 19. The Applicant shall be financially responsible for all applicable water and sanitary charges. Rates applied shall be memorialized in the Development Agreement. 20. All disturbed boulevards shall be restored with sod. All areas of the site, where practical, shall be sodded or seeded and maintained. The property owner shall mow and maintain all site boulevards to the curb line of the public streets. 21. A right-of-way permit shall be required for work performed within the City and/or Ramsey County right-of-way. 22. The Applicant shall provide the City an executed copy of the shared access agreement with North Heights Lutheran Church for the Subject Property that shall be reviewed by the City Attorney and recorded as part of the Development Agreement. 23. All items identified in the November 20, 2024 PW/Engineering Division memo shall be addressed. All comments shall be adopted herein by reference. 24. The proposed structure shall conform to all other regulations in the City Code. • Recommend Approval as Submitted: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 24- 018 for a Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan Review, Final Plat, and Easement Vacation for a Multiple Family Dwelling at 1700 Highway 96, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans in the December 4, 2024 Report to the Planning Commission. • Recommend Denial: Motion to recommend denial of Planning Case 24-018 for a Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan Review, Final Plat, and Easement Vacation for a Multiple Family Dwelling at 1700 Highway 96, based on the following findings: findings to deny should specifically reference the reasons for denial and why those reasons cannot be mitigated. • Table: Motion to table Planning Case 24-018 for a Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan Review, Final Plat, and Easement Vacation for a Multiple Family Dwelling at 1700 Highway 96: a specific reason and information request should be included with a motion to table. Public Comments Notice was published in the Pioneer Press on November 21, 2024. Notice was prepared by the City and mailed to property owners within 1,000 feet of the subject property. The City has not received any public comments regarding this case. The City had previously received written comments for the preliminary plat and rezoning review which included concerns regarding traffic generation, noise, drainage, and the number of senior facilities within the City. Deadline for Agency Actions Page 21 of 21 The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on November 4, 2024. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must act on this request by January 3, 2025 (60 days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60-day review period. The applicant has submitted a waiver for the 60-day review requirement for PC 24-015 and PC 24-018, extending the review to January 13, 2025. Attachments A. Land Use Application B. Location Map C. Narrative D. Civil and Landscape Plans E. Final Plat F. Easement Vacation Exhibits G. Architectural Plans/Renderings H. Exterior Materials I. Lighting Plan J. Traffic Study K. Traffic Noise Assessment L. Tree Survey M. Memorandum to City Engineer, dated November 20, 2024 Page 1 of 9 PUBLIC HEARING – 10A MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: September 9, 2024 Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Jessica Jagoe, Interim City Administrator Elena Fransen, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Planning Case #24-015 – Public Hearing Required Applicant: Trident Development, LLC Property Location: 1700 West Highway 96 Request: Preliminary Plat and Rezoning Council Should Consider the following: Hold the required public hearing for Planning Case 24-015, an application from Trident Development, LLC (“The Applicant”) for a Preliminary Plat and Rezoning to subdivide and purchase approximately 10.74 acres in the northwest corner of the Subject Property. The proposal includes a request to rezone the newly created lot from B-1 Limited Business District to R-4 Multiple Dwelling District in order to allow for the future development of an age-restricted (55+) active senior apartment community with a single three-story building. The City Council will be asked to make a formal decision regarding the application under Agenda Item 11A. Background 1.History of the Subject Property At their February 22, 2022 meeting, the City Council reviewed a concept plan from Trident Development for the development of the northwest corner of the North Heights Lutheran Church property at 1700 West Highway 96. Trident Development was proposing a 115-125 unit senior apartment development (apartments only, the proposed will not have an assisted living or memory care component). The Applicant indicated their intention would be to subdivide and purchase approximately 10.27 acres in the northwest corner of the Subject Property. In preparation for the February 22, 2022 meeting, the Developer had held a neighborhood meeting to garner resident feedback. At the meeting, residents voiced concerns regarding traffic, additional park demand, and noise concerns. Attachment R Page 2 of 9 Aerial Map of Subject Property For a residential project to be feasible on the site, the Applicant needed to amend the Comprehensive Plan. In April 2022, Trident Development submitted an application for amendments to the Arden Hills 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The proposed amendments included amending Chapter 6, Land Use to change the future land use designation of approximately 10.74 acres in the northwest corner of the Subject Property from P/I, Public and Institutional to be guided as HDR, High Density Residential and to amend Section 6.4.10 to increase the maximum housing unit density as part of a Planned Unit Development. The City Council approved and adopted the requested Comprehensive Plan Amendments on July 11, 2022. Adjacent communities must be given up to 60 days to review and comment on a proposed amendment before it can be reviewed and approved by the Metropolitan Council. The Metropolitan Council has the final determination as to whether to allow a Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) or not, though they provide great deference to the City as long as the proposed land use change does not have a negative impact on a regional system (i.e. transportation, sanitary sewer, and regional parks). The Metropolitan Council subsequently approved the requested CPA in 2022. Following the approval and adoption of the requested Comprehensive Plan Amendments, the Applicant is required to submit additional land use requests for the development approvals. At the February 21, 2023 City Council Work Session, the Applicant presented an updated concept plan for the City Council to review. The discussion considered the proposed density for the development, building height, and sidewalk connections to the surrounding neighborhood. In this land use application, the Applicant has included a request to subdivide the 10.74 acres guided as High Density Residential from the developed portion of the site (i.e. Church use, approximately 30 acres), which remains under the Public and Institutional land use designation, and to rezone the subdivided property to R-4, Multiple Dwelling District to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The 10.74 acre parcel would be established as Lot 2, Block 1 Arden Heights Addition and the 30.36 acre parcel would be established as Lot 1, Block 1 Arden Heights Addition. The Applicant’s provided narrative refers to the 10.74 acre parcel as Lot 1 yet this lot is referred to as Lot 2 on the submitted preliminary plat document. This report will reference the Lot designations as shown on the submitted preliminary plat document in Attachment D. Page 3 of 9 At this stage, the City Council is being asked to evaluate the proposed preliminary plat and the proposed rezoning of the newly created lot to align with the future land use designation for this property. A subsequent land use application will be submitted for the final plat as well as the proposed development plans for this property would be brought forward at a future meeting for review. The Comprehensive Plan is the planning tool that guides the future development of land irrespective of a specific project and the City is required to amend the Zoning Code to comply with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code Requirements Minnesota state law requires that all communities within the Minneapolis-St. Paul metropolitan area update their Comprehensive Plans every ten years. The purpose of the Comprehensive Plan is to establish the policies that guide the future physical and community development of Arden Hills. It is also a reference document for the Planning Commission and City Council when evaluating private development projects. Based on the future land uses, the City can plan for improvements, anticipate infrastructure needs, and create appropriate land use regulations. The City’s Zoning Code identifies specific zoning districts through which the land uses and goals in the Comprehensive Plan can be implemented. The zoning cannot conflict with the future land use designation. When there is a conflict between the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Code, the City is required to amend the Zoning Code to comply with the Comprehensive Plan. Approvals The City Council is asked to determine if a Preliminary Plat and Rezoning request should be approved to split the Subject Property located at 1700 West Highway 96 into two separate parcels and to amend the zoning on the proposed newly created 10.74-acre northwest parcel. The evaluation of the proposal should be based on the requirements of Chapter 11 – Subdivisions and Chapter 13 – Zoning Code and the District Provisions in Section 1320. The Preliminary Plat is the first step toward the Final Plat, which is required for the development plans for this property. The Final Plat will be brought forward in a later land use application for review and evaluated according to the Subdivisions ordinance. Page 4 of 9 Proposed Preliminary Plat Plan Evaluation Chapter 11, Subdivisions – Preliminary Plat Section 1130, Minimum Subdivision Design Standards Section 1130.01 - Conformity with City Plan – Meets Requirements Section 1130.01 states that the proposed subdivision shall conform with the City plan. The future land use guiding for the 10.74 acre northwest portion of the Subject Property is High Density Residential Use. The 10.74 acre parcel proposed as Lot 2, Block 1 Arden Heights Addition would be subject to this guiding. The proposed would conform with the language of the City’s Comprehensive Plan. Further, the proposed subdivision of the Subject Property would make it possible for the 10.74 acre parcel guided for High Density Residential Use to be rezoned separately from the 30.36 acre parcel, which would still be guided for Public and Institutional use and will maintain a church land use. N Page 5 of 9 Section 1130.03 and 1130.02 - Street Plan and Streets – Meets Requirements Per Section 1130.02, the arrangement, character, extent, width, grade and location of all streets shall conform to the City plan and shall be considered in their relation to existing and planned streets, to reasonable circulation of traffic, to topographical conditions, to runoff of storm water, to public convenience and safety, and in their appropriate relation to the proposed uses of the land to be served by the streets. Additionally, the arrangement of streets in new subdivisions shall make provision for the appropriate continuation of the existing streets in adjoining areas. Where adjoining areas are not subdivided, the arrangement of streets in new subdivisions shall make provision for the proper projection of the streets. No new streets would be constructed for the Preliminary Plat. Both lots would have frontage and access on Highway 96 by way of the existing driveway access utilized by the church site. Site access to the 10.74 parcel would be provided by the existing access drive from County Highway 96 by way of a permanent easement agreement with the church. At the August 7, 2024 Planning Commission meeting, the Applicant noted that a permanent access and maintenance easement agreement will be documented as part of the final plat. A secondary access drive serving the church property is located at the southeast property line of the Subject Property along Snelling Avenue North. The Applicant has stated an intent to modify this access point to restrict right turn movement from the site to Snelling Avenue. The Applicant states that this modification is intended to complement existing signage at the intersection and discourage use of this drive by occupants of the new lot. The Applicant has provided a Traffic Review Memo from Transportation Collaborative & Consultants, LLC, dated June 28, 2024 which is attached as Attachment E. Section 1130.05 - Easements – Evaluated on the Final Plat Easements at least twelve (12) feet wide; contiguous to all planned boundary lines, street right-of- way lines and centered on rear and other lot lines, shall be provided for utility and drainage purposes and shall be dedicated to the public on the final plat. The Applicant has been working with the Public Works Director/City Engineer on the dedication of easements and will apply for a request to vacate areas of existing drainage and utility easements within the areas of proposed Lot 2 as part of the Final Plat review. Drainage and utility easements shown on the preliminary plat will be dedicated as required by the subdivision ordinance and recorded as part of the final plat. As part of the preliminary plat review, the Applicant has adjusted the width of the proposed drainage and utility easement in the northwest corner of site according to staff comments. Final comments from the Public Works Director/City Engineer on this code section will be provided as part of the final plat and vacation of easement application review. The Applicant has also been directed to work with the Rice Creek Watershed District to attain their review of easements proposed in the preliminary plat, which would be recorded as part of the final plat, and existing drainage and utility easements which the Applicant would request to vacate as part of the final plat. Section 1130.07 – Lots – Meets Requirements For location, all lots shall abut by their full frontage on a publicly dedicated street or a street that has received legal status as such or will receive such status upon approval of the subject plat. For size, the lot dimensions in subdivisions shall not be less than the minimum dimensions required to secure the minimum lot area specified in the zoning ordinance of the City. Page 6 of 9 The two lots have frontage on a public street, Highway 96. The two lots exceed the minimum lot dimensions as required by the Zoning Code for the current zoning. The tables below show an evaluation of the proposed lot dimensions based on the current zoning designation. The evaluation of Lot 2, Block 1 also shows how the parcel meets the requirements of the R-4 Zoning District as this is the Applicant’s proposed zoning district for the rezoning request of this application. Evaluation of lot dimensions for Lot 1, Block 1 (Church site) 30.36 acre parcel (Proposed Lot 1, Block 1) R-1 Requirement (Existing Use) Proposed for 30.36 acre parcel Minimum Lot Area Non- Residential Uses 14,000 square feet 1,322,416 square feet Minimum Lot Size Minimum Lot Width Minimum Lot Depth NA for non-residential uses NA for non-residential uses NA for non-residential uses NA for non-residential uses Evaluation of lot dimensions for Lot 2, Block 1 (Future senior apartment building site) 10.74 acre parcel (Proposed Lot 2, Block 1) B-1 Requirement (Existing Use) R-4 Requirement (Proposed Use) Proposed for 10.74 acre parcel Minimum Lot Area (SF per Dwelling Unit) 13,000 square feet 3,630 square feet per Dwelling Unit 468,025 square feet, for 122 units, 3,836.27 square feet per Dwelling Unit Minimum Lot Size Minimum Lot Width Minimum Lot Depth 100 feet 130 feet 85 feet 120 feet >166.1 feet >220.8 feet Section 1130.08 - Public Use Dedications – Evaluated on the Final Plat The City’s Subdivision Code establishes requirements for Public Use Dedications and Park, trails, and open space land dedication and development. Owners or developers, as a prerequisite to approval of a subdivision to convey to the City or dedicate to the public use a reasonable portion of any such proposal for public use as streets, roads, sewers, electric, gas, and water facilities, storm water drainage and holding areas or ponds and similar utilities and improvements, parks, recreational facilities, playgrounds, trails, wetlands, or open space, in such portions to be approved and acceptable to the City. Public Use Dedications and Park, trails, and open space land dedication and development will be reviewed with the Final Plat land use application for the newly created lot. Section 1140, Required Improvements – Evaluated on the Final Plat Section 1140 of the Subdivision Code establishes improvements that are required as part of a new subdivision. These improvements include survey monuments, sewers and water, utilities, sidewalks, curb and gutter, and stormwater management. The Final Plat review will verify compliance with these provisions and/or conditions will be established as part of a final plat approval. Page 7 of 9 In reference to stormwater management, the Applicant has submitted their stormwater management plan for staff review. The Applicant stated in their narrative that the proposed stormwater management plan meets or exceeds the rules and requirements of the Rice Creek Watershed District, noting that underground storage chambers would be utilized in addition to the sedimentation pond for controlling the rate of discharge and filtering out sediment. Catch basins would collect surface drainage and direct it toward the sedimentation pond or to the underground storage chambers. Treated stormwater would be discharged into a nearby wetland basin. The Applicant’s stormwater management plan is subject to Rice Creek Watershed District review prior to the Final Plat. Staff has shared the Applicant’s plans with RCWD and the Applicant has been directed to work with RCWD regarding drainage and utilities prior to the final plat review. Chapter 13, Zoning Code - Rezoning Section 1320, District Provisions The Applicant is requesting to rezone the 10.74 acre Lot 2, Block 1 Arden Heights Addition parcel shown on the preliminary plat from B-1 Limited Business District to R-4 Multiple Dwelling District to be consistent with the site’s guiding as High Density Residential in the 2040 Arden Hills Comprehensive Plan. The rezoning would also provide for the Applicant’s intended use for the parcel for an age-restricted (55+) active senior apartment community with a single three-story building. The Zoning Code in Section 1320.04, Subd. 4 includes the following purposes of the R-4 Multiple Dwelling District - 1. To establish areas for the development of multiple dwelling structures with a maximum density of twelve (12) units per net acre; 2. To permit the most intensive residential development allowed in the City; and 3. To maintain an essentially residential character in areas developed at a more intensive density. Parcels zoned for the R-4 Zoning District are subject to the zoning requirements as noted in Section 1320.05 Land Use Chart and Section 1320.06 District Requirements Chart. The 10.74 acre parcel meets the requirements for lot dimensions in the R-4 Zoning District in Section 1320.06. Future improvements to the parcel would be subject to the district requirements for the R-4 Zoning District and shall be evaluated when a land use application for development is initiated. The Applicant states that the intended use for the 10.74 acre parcel is a single, 3-story building with approximately 122 units for an age-restricted (55+) active senior apartment community. In the Section 1320. 05 of the Zoning Code, a multiple family dwelling is a use that is permitted in the R-4 Zoning District through a conditional use permit. Future land use applications that include a multi-family dwelling use would be evaluated according to the R-4 density and development requirements as well as the conditional use permit criteria. The City Council’s review of this rezoning request may also consider the following: 1. Conformity with Comprehensive Plan 2. Substantive changes that have occurred making the zoning change necessary Page 8 of 9 3. Demonstration showing that the change is superior to the current Zoning and/or Comprehensive Plan 4. Development conditions or priorities that make the existing Zoning and/or Comprehensive Plan impractical The 10.74 acre parcel proposed for rezoning is guided in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan for High Density Residential use which provides for densities of nine (9) to twelve (12) units per acre. The parcel’s current zoning designation of B-1 Limited Business District does not permit multiple family dwelling uses and the district does not establish a maximum dwelling unit density per net acre. At present, the guiding future land use classification and the current zoning designation for the parcel are in conflict. When there is a conflict between the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Code, the City is required to amend the Zoning Code to comply with the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed rezoning would effectively amend the Zoning Code to address the conflict by allowing for the density of up to twelve (12) units per acre to be developed in alignment with the densities provided for in the High Density Residential use guiding. The proposed rezoning would conform with the Comprehensive Plan. The Applicant intends to comply with the performance standards of the R-4 Zoning District and would bring forward an application through the Planned Unit Development land use process upon review of the rezoning request. The Applicant notes that there may be a request for the City to consider flexibilities in a future land use application. The change to the current zoning would make it possible for the Applicant’s intended use to be developed and bring the parcel’s guiding and zoning into alignment. As part of the preliminary plat and rezoning application, and in anticipation of the intended future use, the Applicant has provided a Traffic Review Memo (Attachment E) which references the future intended use of the newly created parcel. The memo notes that the overall impact of the intended use on area roadway capacity is expected to be minimal and that no significant issues are expected as a result of the proposed development from a traffic capacity perspective. Additional Review Public Works Director/City Engineer The Public Works Director/City Engineer has reviewed the preliminary plat plans and directed the Applicant on modifications that have been completed. A comment included that the Applicant shall work with the Rice Creek Watershed District to discuss any modifications or additions to drainage easements. This comment has been added as a condition of approval. A full Engineering report will be completed for the final plat review. Ramsey County Ramsey County has reviewed the plans. Comments included references to the traffic study including TMCs, coordination with Rice Creek Commons spine road construction, and permitting requirements for changes to access point, trail connection or utility connections. Comments have been shared with the Applicant. Fire Department Page 9 of 9 The Fire Marshal has reviewed the plans. Comments included fire protection locations and a turn radius study radius study completed based on emergency vehicle specifications. It was noted that these would be reviewed with final building plans. Rice Creek Watershed District The Rice Creek Watershed District has provided an initial review of the plans. Initial comments have been shared with the Applicant and note that a RCWD permit for stormwater management and erosion/sediment control will be required. Planning Commission Review The Planning Commission reviewed this application at the August 7, 2024 meeting. The Commission voted 6-1 to recommend approval with the two staff-drafted conditions of Planning Case 24-015. Public Comments Notice was published in the Pioneer Press on August 14, 2024. Notice was prepared by the City and mailed to property owners within 1,000 feet of the subject property. The City received four written comments before the Planning Commission meeting, and one after. Concerns included traffic generation, noise, drainage, and the number of senior facilities within the City. Attachments A. Land Use Application B. Location Map C. Narrative D. Preliminary Plat and Civil Plans E. Traffic Memo F. PC Staff Report G. Draft PC Minutes H. Presentation Approved: CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 4, 2024 6:30 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY HALL CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Chair Kurtis Weber called to order the regular Planning Commission meeting at 6:30 p.m. ROLL CALL Present were: Chair Kurtis Weber, Commissioners Brad Bjorklund, Shelley Blilie, Joshua Collins, Stephen Erler, Arlene Mitchell, and Jonathan Wicklund. Absent: None. Also present were: Interim City Administrator Jessica Jagoe, Consultant Planner T.J. Hofer, and Councilmember Emily Rousseau. APPROVAL OF AGENDA – DECEMBER 4, 2024 Commissioner Erler moved, seconded by Commissioner Bjorklund, to approve the December 4, 2024, agenda as presented. The motion carried unanimously (7-0). APPROVAL OF MINUTES November 6, 2024 – Planning Commission Regular Meeting Commissioner Wicklund moved, seconded by Commissioner Bjorklund, to approve the November 6, 2024, Planning Commission Regular Meeting as presented. The motion carried unanimously (7-0). PLANNING CASES A. Planning Case 24-018 – 1700 Highway 96 W. – Master and Final Planned Unit Development, Final Plat, Site Plan Review, Conditional Use Permit, and Easement Vacation – Public Hearing Consultant Planner Hofer stated the Applicant has submitted a land use application for a Master Planned Unit Development (PUD), Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan Review, Final Plat, and Easement Vacation to subdivide and develop an approximately 41.10 acre property that currently contains a place of worship at 1700 Highway Attachment S ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – December 4, 2024 2 96 West. North Heights Lutheran Church currently owns the Subject Property and contains a single structure that acts as a House of Worship. The property currently has split zoning with a majority of the site zoned R-1 Single Family Residential District and the northwest of the parcel zoned B-1 Limited Business District. The Subject Property is also within the Shoreland Overlay District based on its proximity to Round Lake. Consultant Planner Hofer reported the proposed changes to the site would subdivide the property into two conforming lots, to facilitate construction of a 162,819 square foot, 119 -unit multiple family dwelling, and construct additional parking for the existing house of worship. The proposed PUD would be exclusive to the proposed Lot 1, Block 1. The Applicant made an application for Preliminary Plat and Rezoning on July 17, 2024. The Preliminary Plat and Rezoning (PC 24-015) was reviewed by the Planning Commission on August 7, 2024, and the City Council on September 11, 2024. The City Council approved the Preliminary Plat at the September meeting but tabled the Rezoning on based on the need to review the land use application concurrently with the rezoning request. The Preliminary Plat was approved with the following conditions: 1. The Applicant shall submit to the City a land use application for Final Plat within three (3) months after the date of approval of the Preliminary Plat 2. The Applicant shall work with the Rice Creek Watershed District to review future modifications to vacate existing drainage and utility easements as well as proposed newly dedicated drainage and utility easements prior to the submittal of the Final Plat application. Modifications and newly dedicated easements shall be to the satisfaction of RCWD and the City. Consultant Planner Hofer explained the three-month deadline for the submittal for the final plat based on the above condition was December 9, 2024. Based on this date, the City extended the review of the rezoning in PC 24-015 to November 12, 2024. The Applicant initially made an application for Master Planned Unit Development (PUD), Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit (CUP), and Site Plan Review in October of 2024, but the application was deemed incomplete. The Applicant applied again on November 4, 2024, with the addition of an application for Final Plat and Easement Vacation, and the application was deemed complete. Due to the meeting schedule of the City, the Applicant has also submitted a waiver for their rights to a timely review as required by Minnesota State Statute §15.99, for the Final Plat and Rezoning applications, until January 13, 2025. The Subject Property has access from County Highway 96 to the north and Snelling Avenue North to the east. Properties around the parcel are zoned R-1 Single Family Residential District and POS Parks and Open Space District and are used for residential uses and houses of worship. Consultant Planner Hofer reviewed the history of the subject property, the Plan Evaluation and provided the Findings of Fact for review: 1. The property located at 1700 Highway 96 West is designated for High Density Residential uses on the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. 2. New building construction or site modification identified requires the submittal of a Site Plan Review application prior to construction. 3. For proposals for new construction, redevelopment of a site, and significant modifications to existing sites a PUD is required 4. The PUD process allows for flexibility within the City’s regulations through a negotiated process with a Developer. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – December 4, 2024 3 5. The Applicant has proposed a Site Plan Review, Master and Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Final Plat, and Vacation in order to construct a 119-unit age-restricted apartment. 6. The Applicant has proposed a Master and Final Planned Unit Development for the development of one approximate 162,819 square foot multiple family dwelling on the Subject Property. 7. The Applicant has proposed additional improvements to the proposed Lot 2, Block 1, to construct additional parking and install landscaping for the existing house of worship use. 8. The Master and Final Planned Unit Development generally conforms to the requirements of the City Zoning Code and design standards. 9. Where the plan is not in conformance with the City Code, the Applicant has requested flexibility. 10. Flexibility through the PUD process has been requested in the following areas: density, floor area ratio, and building height. 11. A public hearing for a Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, and Conditional Use Permit request is required before the request can be brought before the City Council. Consultant Planner Hofer stated options for the application, including approval of Planning Case 24-018 for a Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan Review, Final Plat, and Easement Vacation for a Multiple Family Dwelling at 1700 Highway 96, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by the conditions in the December 4, 2024 Report to the Planning Commission: 1. The project shall be completed in accordance with the submitted plans as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the Community Development Director, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. 2. The Conditional Use Permit and Master Planned Unit Development and Final Planned Unit Development shall expire one year from the date of City Council approval unless a building permit has been requested or a time extension has been granted by the City Council. The City Council may extend the expiration date of such approval upon written application by the person to whom the approval was granted. 3. A violation of any condition set forth in the permit shall be a violation of this Code and shall be cause for revocation of the permit. 4. Prior to the release of the Final Plat for recording, the Applicant shall enter into a Development Agreement. 5. The Final Plat shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a building permit. 6. A Master and Final PUD Development Agreement shall be prepared by the City Attorney and subject to City Council approval for the Development. The Master and Final PUD Development Agreement shall be fully executed prior to the issuance of building permits. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a landscape financial security equal to 125% of the cost of the landscaping to be installed on the site shall be submitted. The Applicant must submit a detailed cost estimate for the landscaping so staff can determine the final amount. Landscape financial security shall be held for two full growing seasons. For any landscaping that is not in accordance with the approved landscaping plan at the end of two growing seasons, the Developer shall replace the material to the satisfaction of the City before the guarantee is released. Where this is not done, the City, at its sole discretion, may use the proceeds of the performance guarantee to accomplish performance. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – December 4, 2024 4 7. A Grading and Erosion permit shall be obtained from the city’s Engineering Division prior to commencing any grading, land disturbance or utility activities. The Applicant shall be responsible for obtaining any permits necessary from other agencies, including but not limited to, MPCA, Rice Creek Watershed District, MnDOT and Ramsey County (i.e., ROW or access) prior to the start of any site activities. 8. The final plans shall be subject to approval by the City Engineer, Building Official, and Fire Marshal prior to the issuance of a grading and erosion control permit and shall be consistent with the memorandum from the City Engineer. 9. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the final plans shall show markings and signage to identify access off the site onto County Highway 96 as “Left Turn Only” with signage showing “No Right Turn.” 10. Final landscaping plans shall be revised to relocated trees outside of any drainage and utility easements and shown with trees with a minimum caliper inch of 2.5 inches. 11. Final grading, drainage, utility, and site plans shall be subject to approval by the Public Works Director, City Engineer, and Community Development Director prior to the issuance of a grading and erosion control permit or other development permits. 12. Upon completion of grading and utility work on the site, a grading as-built and utility as- built shall be provided to the City for review. 13. Heavy duty silt fence and adequate erosion control around the entire construction site shall be required and maintained by the Developer during construction to ensure that sediment and storm water does not leave the project site. 14. The Applicant shall be responsible for protecting the proposed on-site storm sewer infrastructure and components and any existing storm sewer from exposure to any and all stormwater runoff, sediments and debris during all construction activities. Temporary stormwater facilities shall be installed to protect the quality aspect of the proposed and existing stormwater facilities prior to and during construction activities. Maintenance of any and all temporary stormwater facilities shall be the responsibility of the Applicant. 15. All light poles, including base, shall be a maximum of 25 feet in height and shall be shoebox style, downward directed, with high-pressure sodium lamps or LED and flush lenses. 16. All rooftop or ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be hidden from view with the same materials used on the building in accordance with City Code requirements. 17. A separate sign permit shall be required for all signs on the site. 18. Any future trash enclosures shall utilize gates and be constructed on three sides using the same materials and patterns used on the building. Locations shall be approved by the Planning Department. 19. The Applicant shall be financially responsible for all applicable water and sanitary charges. Rates applied shall be memorialized in the Development Agreement. 20. All disturbed boulevards shall be restored with sod. All areas of the site, where practical, shall be sodded or seeded and maintained. The property owner shall mow and maintain all site boulevards to the curb line of the public streets. 21. A right-of-way permit shall be required for work performed within the City and/or Ramsey County right-of-way. 22. The Applicant shall provide the City an executed copy of the shared access agreement with North Heights Lutheran Church for the Subject Property that shall be reviewed by the City Attorney and recorded as part of the Development Agreement. 23. All items identified in the November 20, 2024 PW/Engineering Division memo shall be addressed. All comments shall be adopted herein by reference. 24. The proposed structure shall conform to all other regulations in the City Code. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – December 4, 2024 5 Consultant Planner Hofer reviewed the options available to the Planning Commission on this matter: 1. Recommend Approval with Conditions 2. Recommend Approval as Submitted 3. Recommend Denial 4. Table Chair Weber opened the floor to Commissioner comments. Commissioner Blilie asked what was being considered by the Planning Commission, given the fact the City Council approved this project in September. Consultant Planner Hofer stated he could not speak for the City Council. Chair Weber requested staff to clarify what action was taken by the City Council in September. Consultant Planner Hofer explained the City Council approved the preliminary plat in September and the final plat was now before the Planning Commission for consideration. He recommended the Commission’s focus be on the flexibility requests within the PUD and CUP. Commissioner Collins stated it appears the City modified its perspective to allow for increased density in order to meet the goals within the comprehensive plan. He asked if the proposed deviation was to meet the comprehensive plan. Consultant Planner Hofer commented this was a difficult question to answer. He noted this area was not guided for residential use, however, this does not preclude the area from being developed into residential. He reported establishing additional housing units would not be inappropriate for a PUD for property guided High Density Residential. Commissioner Wicklund questioned if there was any flexibility in the park dedication fees. Consultant Planner Hofer stated residential dedication was based on the 10% of the estimated market value of a property. He indicated there was some discretion within the code that allows for this number to be flexible. Commissioner Wicklund inquired if the Planning Commission could change the $773,000 to a different number. Consultant Planner Hofer stated this number was established within the fee ordinance. Commissioner Wicklund asked if the exit location for this project would be directly across from the spine road where there would be a traffic light. Consultant Planner Hofer reported this was the case. Chair Weber commented on the park dedication fee, noting the City has the authority to waive certain fees or change the number. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – December 4, 2024 6 Commissioner Erler questioned if the Commission should be considering the development given the fact the City Council has tabled action on the zoning of this property. Consultant Planner Hofer indicated there was not a procedural conflict at this time. He stated approval of this Planning Case would be contingent upon the rezoning. Commissioner Erler asked if it would be pertinent to add a condition to that affect. Consultant Planner Hofer stated this would be appropriate. Commissioner Erler requested further information on what a residential dedication was. Consultant Planner Hofer explained this was either land or a fee that was required of residential developers and has to do with the dedication of a reasonable portion of land for open space or other public use. He indicated this development was dedicating right of way along with drainage and utility easements. He reported cash in lieu could be offered by a developer for 10% of the property value. He stated the proposed property was valued at $22 million prior to the subdivision. Commissioner Erler indicated this would mean the developer was responsible for paying the City $2.2 million in dedication fees. Consultant Planner Hofer reported this was the case, but commented this may depend on if the subdivision for the property has paid park dedication in the past. He explained he did not believe park dedication had previously been collected. Further discussion ensued regarding the size of this property. Commissioner Bjorklund indicated this was a large housing project. He asked if the Commission was bound by the goals of the City as stated within the comprehensive plan. Interim City Administrator Jagoe commented on the housing goals within the comprehensive plan noting Commission should look to these as goals, but not strict adherence. She indicated the land use chapter should be considered for guidance of future land uses. Commissioner Bjorklund commented on the goals of the City within the housing chapter of the comprehensive plan. He reported one of the goals was to encourage the incorporation of affordable housing in new development. He reviewed the language within the comprehensive plan that states Arden Hills needed more affordable housing units. He believed the City had a clear goal when it came to housing and he was of the opinion the City should be following this goals. He supported relaxing the dedication fees in order to receive more affordable housing units. He stated without the inclusion of any affordable housing, he may be voting against this entire project. Chair Weber stated he was not entirely supportive of this project, but he understood the City Council wanted to see it moving forward. He understood the City needed to work to achieve its affordable housing goals and recommended 20% of the units be affordable. He explained if the developer were to work towards this goal, he could support lowering or lessening some of the dedication fees. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – December 4, 2024 7 Chair Weber questioned if the south parking lot was connected to the church parking lot. Consultant Planner Hofer explained these two parking lots were connected. Chair Weber recommended a trail connection be provided by the developer in order to provide pedestrian access to the trail adjacent to this property. He asked if it was the applicant’s intent to have a left turn only onto Highway 96. Interim City Administrator Jagoe recommended the applicant speak to this further. Chair Weber asked if the additional church parking lot that was being built was required to meet minimum parking requirements. Consultant Planner Hofer stated the church needed additional parking based on the reduction that would occur for the multi-family dwelling project. He indicated the house of workshop currently has 866 parking stalls. He noted this number would be reduced if the multi-family project were to move forward. For this reason, the house of worship was proposing to construct a new parking lot with 76 parking stalls. He explained the site would then have 795 stalls where 774 were required. Chair Weber questioned why the house of worship would be constructing this additional parking lot. Roger Fink, Trident Development, stated he was a representative for North Heights Lutheran Church. He explained the parking allocation for the house of worship has always exceeded the code minimum. He indicated North Heights Lutheran Church holds worship services and a variety of other community events. He stated the church feels a need to preserve a portion of surplus parking given how a portion of parking would be lost to the multi-family development. Chair Weber asked why this project was being presented in the manner that it was. He stated he was concerned with the slow roll of this development and how it has been brought to the Commission for consideration in several different iterations. He reviewed comments from the developer stating they had told the City this project would come forward with all the pieces and conform to City Code. He indicated the proposed plans do not conform to City Code. He inquired if there had been an intent to conform to zoning code requirements. Mr. Fink stated in one of the early worksession meetings with the City Council, he identified several potential flexibility areas, one was the floor area ratio (FAR) and the other was building height. He commented the density number was also being considered. He commented on the landscaping plan noting he would have to plant a great deal more plantings than he had originally thought. He indicated the building height could probably be brought into conformance. He stated the proposed building was at 38 feet when the City allows for 35 feet. He believed the three feet difference was reasonable given how building standards have changed and renters now want nine foot ceiling heights. He reported Arden Hills was quite unique in having an FAR in a residential district. He stated in order to reduce the FAR he would have to eliminate the proposed public space or amenities within the building. He indicated when it comes to density, this matter was addressed early on through the comprehensive plan amendment, which allowed for a flexibility to exceed 12 units per acre. He explained he would only be exceeding this by one or two units per acre. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – December 4, 2024 8 Chair Weber stated this may only be one or two units per acre, but ended up being 20+ units more for the entire development. Mr. Fink discussed how he exceeded many of the performance standards required by the City by having more open space than required by ordinance, the building had a smaller footprint, more parking, and the project had more landscaping and less impervious surface than was required. Chair Weber was of the opinion the City needed more affordable housing and asked if there was any opportunity to add affordable housing units to this development. Mr. Fink commented this was the first time this has come up. He indicated he had not addressed affordable housing. He reported typically affordable units came with some sort of assistance from the City. He stated he would need to know what an affordable unit means. Chair Weber stated this development was providing a unique opportunity to the City by providing residential housing on a property that does not pay property tax. He explained he would like to see affordable housing incorporated into this housing development and if finances were required from the City this would be a good investment for the City. Commissioner Wicklund asked where the proposed housing product sits on the expense side of construction. Mr. Fink reported the proposed units would have high quality construction and finishes and the building would have architectural appeal. He indicated he would not be building the highest quality building, but anticipated the units would be constructed above average. He believed his market rate rents would be comparable to the other rental units in the community. Commissioner Collins questioned what the rental rates would be. Mr. Fink estimated the rental rate ranges would be $1,900 to $3,000 per month depending on the size of the unit. Chair Weber asked if the developer had spoken with Ramsey County regarding coordination for the intersection. Mr. Fink reported civil engineers have been in touch with Ramsey County to address right of way, access, the intersection and permits. Commissioner Bjorklund questioned why some of the trees within the landscaping plan were being planted on the church property. Mr. Fink explained he was required to plant more trees than would fit on the lot and for this reason, he was proposing to put surplus plantings on the church lot. He indicated the church supported the proposed placement for the plantings. Chair Weber indicated another way to address the planting needs would be to plant larger trees on the multi-family housing lot, instead of planting 2” trees on the subject property. Mr. Fink commented he would like to further investigate what size caliper trees were being proposed. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – December 4, 2024 9 Commissioner Collins addressed Attachment J and asked if the development intention has changed since the traffic study was completed. He stated he was surprised by the low trip generation from the proposed housing development. Mr. Fink reported an age restricted housing development was proposed which led to the low trip generation. Commissioner Mitchell inquired if the residential dedication was tied to an expense for the City. Consultant Planner Hofer stated the proposed fee was tied to utility improvements, such as streets, roads, etc. He commented if a CUP or PUD is required, the dedication payment can be determined as a result of the increased demand on park land or park improvements. He reported this meant the City had to consider how this development will impact demand for the public facilities in the community. Commissioner Mitchell discussed how part of affordable housing was to keep overall construction costs down. She anticipated if the dedication fees were lower, this would assist with providing more affordable housing units. She indicated this land has access to roads and parking. She hoped because these expenses do not apply that the City could keep the residential dedication lower in order to make the units more affordable. Consultant Planner Hofer stated it was relevant to consider minimum needs for parks, trails and wetlands for the subject development and what the City would be responsible for maintaining long-term. Chair Weber commented this also involves connection to and use of City utilities. Mr. Fink indicated the tabling by the City Council for the rezoning occurred because the Council was uncertain with how the project would move forward. He explained the City Council was apprehensive about the number of units that would be included in this project and for that reason, tabled the rezoning. Chair Weber opened the public hearing at 8:03 p.m. Chair Weber invited anyone for or against the application to come forward and make comment. There being no comment Chair Weber closed the public hearing at 8:04 p.m. Councilmember Rousseau discussed the City’s fee schedule and asked when was the last time the City updated its park dedication fees. Interim City Administrator Jagoe reported this was last done in approx. 2015/2016. Chair Weber stated it would be useful to know if other cities have recently made changes or updates to their park or residential dedication fees. Commissioner Wicklund stated he was in favor of pushing this project forward. He indicated he was comfortable with the increased density, FAR and building height. He explained the value ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – December 4, 2024 10 of the entire parcel was $22 million and the developer was proposing to purchase 10 of the 40 acres. He stated this would lead to a land dedication payment (at 15%) of $825,000. He suggested the Commission deal with the affordable housing piece as a separate motion or condition for approval. Interim City Administrator Jagoe commented on the City’s public use dedication and park development fees. She indicated the City could waive public use dedication fees and recommended the Commission discuss this matter further, but noted subsidizing the development for affordable housing would have to meet a “but for” test. She explained the developer should assess whether or not a fee waiver was necessary. Chair Weber stated if the Commission were to ask for affordable housing, could the Commission offer an amendment to waive fees or recommend the City negotiate as necessary in order to achieve affordable housing units. Interim City Administrator Jagoe reported if the Commission wants this brought forward, she recommended the developer communicate if this was something they would be seeking from the City. She explained the affordable housing request was a new add that staff had not prepared for. Chair Weber stated a lot of information would have to be gathered that may put this project in a table situation. Interim City Administrator Jagoe indicated this may be the case. She stated the Commission could make a recommendation on public use dedication but noted other reduction of fees or waivers should wait until the developer brings forward a request to ensure all criteria within the City’s public financing guidelines for affordable housing requirements were being met. Chair Weber stated the Commission could make a recommendation with respect to park dedication and land dedication and the City Council could take it from there. He explained if there was no agreement on affordable housing, this project may not happen in its current form. Commissioner Bjorklund indicated he did not have any objections to the project, except he would like to recommend Condition 25 and that it read: The project will include an affordable housing component, with or without subsidies. Commissioner Erler stated in the past four years the City has added two multi-unit age restricted buildings or 211 market rate units. He indicated this development would raise this number to 330. He explained this was a 10% increase in the total number of residential units in the City. He commented his extra housing was a good thing in the tight housing market. However, he did regret that not one of these units would be available to low income seniors. He stated by comparison, both New Brighton and Roseville have added entire buildings of income adjusted rental units for seniors. His opinion that Arden Hills was part of the problem as the City has not made affordable housing a priority. He commented he could support the minor flexibilities that are being requested, but recommended this project not move forward without affordable units included. Commissioner Collins reported this project does not meet the comprehensive goals when it comes to affordable housing. He believed this was a pretty big miss. He stated he would like to see intentionality from the developer when it comes to affordable housing units, especially because this was a 55+ community. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – December 4, 2024 11 Commissioner Mitchell indicated she would support this project. She believed the variances the developer was requesting were reasonable. She commented further on the process that must be followed by developers in order to pursue State grant funding for affordable housing units. She believed the affordable housing discussion was being brought in late from the Commission for this project. She anticipated the developer would have to start this project over if affordable housing was required. She believed it would benefit the community to have more median priced rental housing available and noted this new housing could lead to more single family homes being on the market. She stated she would be voting to move this project forward. Chair Weber commented this was the Planning Commission’s first look at this project in the past three years. He indicated he has heard about the comprehensive plan and zoning changes, but noted this was the Commission’s first chance to provide input on the City’s affordable housing goals. He believed now was the chance to ask for affordable housing. He was of the opinion this was a must for this project, especially given the flexibilities that were being offered by the City. Interim City Administrator Jagoe explained the comprehensive plan amendment that allowed for the PUD process allows for a density bonus if through the PUD process, other performance criteria are met. She reported the criteria that needed to be met does not require the creation of affordable housing. She stated if the Commission feels the application has not met the criteria for a PUD to grant the flexibility for 13.9 units per acre, the applicant would be held to the 12 units per acre as allowed by city code. She indicated the Planning Commission did not have the option to extend the review period any further because the City was up against the January 13, 2025 15.99 deadline. Commissioner Wicklund reported he was ready to make a motion. Commissioner Bjorklund requested the developer speak if they would be willing to extending the application time period. Interim City Administrator Jagoe commented the 15.99 timelines are for the rezoning and the final plat and the City has no additional time to review these matters. She indicated the City may have an opportunity to extend the PUD review, but noted the City Council wanted to see the land use application align with the rezoning review. She stated it would be a challenge if only the PUD portion of this project were extended. She reiterated that the rezoning and final plat would have to be reviewed on January 13, 2025. Commissioner Bjorklund stated he would be voting against this project because of its abject nonconformance to the City’s comprehensive plan. Chair Weber agreed. Interim City Administrator Jagoe indicated the Planning Commission could recommend denial of the project for reasons it was not consistent with the goals of the comprehensive plan, or the Commission could put forth a recommendation for approval without flexibility in certain areas of the project. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – December 4, 2024 12 Commissioner Bjorklund stated he has been talking to a gentleman from North Heights Lutheran Church for years about this project and how low income housing should be a factor. In addition, he noted he spoke with the developer as well. Commissioner Collins reported the comprehensive plan was explicit when it came to low income housing and this was something that should be taken into consideration. He believed there was something missing from this development and noted he would be leaning towards not supporting this project. Commissioner Wicklund stated he appreciated the comments about the desire to follow the comprehensive plan, but it was his opinion this would do a disservice to an outside business that was coming into this situation. He reported casting this expectation on their business model near the end of the process was burdensome. He was of the opinion staff has heard the concerns of the Commission and as new developments come forward considerations will be made. He stated he would be supporting this project moving forward, with the understanding the Planning Commission was a recommending body to the City Council. Commissioner Collins indicated his difficulty with this was that this was an outside business and the affordable housing units could benefit the residents of Arden Hills. He questioned if this project should benefit the outside business or the residents of Arden Hills. Chair Weber stated this was going on year for of this project and he was of the opinion the developer had slow rolled this project intentionally. He explained he would not feel guilty about the applicant now being in a position for the manner in which this project was presented to the City. He commented on how the need for affordable housing has grown over the past two or three years. Commissioner Blilie reported even if these units were not affordable, if seniors in the community moved to them, it would open up single family houses in Arden Hills. Chair Weber stated he understood this to be the case, but noted the existing senior rental units within the community were not full and he did not believe it was in the City’s best interest to build more of the same. Commissioner Collins explained if this building were to move forward, these types of developments would pull tenants from the surrounding communities as well. Chair Weber reported this was a tax exempt property that does not pay property taxes. He indicated the City could add an enormous amount of affordable housing to this site without impacting the City’s bottom line, and there would still be a net positive for the community. Mr. Fink stated he was not opposed to having affordable units on this property. He indicated when he brought forward concepts, the concept has explained the units were intended to be market rate. He explained he did not receive any push back from neighbors or the City Council on this concept. He asked that the Commission recommend approval of the project with a suggestion an affordable element be included. Chair Weber asked if Mr. Fink had experience with creating affordable rental units within his previous developments. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION – December 4, 2024 13 Mr. Fink stated he did have experience noting these projects required TIF. Chair Weber was of the opinion the only feasible option for the Planning Commission was to recommend denial of this request with the intent to continue moving forward in order to work towards a viable product for the City. Commissioner Bjorklund stated there was a clear failure to comply with the City’s comprehensive plan. Commissioner Bjorklund moved and Commissioner Collins seconded a motion to recommend denial of Planning Case 24-018 for a Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan Review, Final Plat, and Easement Vacation for a Multiple Family Dwelling at 1700 Highway 96, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans based on the fact the project fails to meet the goals within Section 7 of the City’s comprehensive plan and it fails to recognize policies implemented in Section 6. Commissioner Erler stated the Commission could deny on the basis of not accepting the flexibility requests on the grounds that they are not consistent with the comprehensive plan. Commissioner Collins reported this would be a denial based on the density and the Commission was not supporting the proposed density because the City’s comprehensive plan and affordable housing goals were not being met. Interim City Administrator Jagoe indicated the PUD does not require affordable housing to be a part of the project. She stated the Planning Commission would have to be specific on where the PUD does not align with the goals of the comprehensive plan. She reiterated that the comprehensive plan does not require affordable housing. Consultant Planner Hofer explained the staff report included language regarding approval and denial and could be reviewed by the Commission for motion language. He stated that there are review criteria established in the zoning ordinance for CUPs and these standards were included in the staff report. Chair Weber stated the Commission would be making a recommendation for denial for the additional density, FAR and building height based on the lack of conformance to the comprehensive plan, based on orderly development of the neighborhood and City within the general purpose and intent of the zoning code and comprehensive plan for the City. He suggested this be added as a friendly amendment to the language within the motion. Chair Weber moved and Commissioner Collins seconded an amendment to the motion language to include the following: denial for the additional density, FAR and building height based on the lack of conformance to the comprehensive plan, based on orderly development of the neighborhood and City within the general purpose and intent of the zoning code and comprehensive plan for the City. The amendment motion carried unanimously (7-0). The amended motion carried 5-2 (Commissioners Mitchell and Wicklund opposed). •Planning Case #24-018 –Public Hearing Required •Applicant: Trident Development, LLC., Roger Fink •Request: Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan Review, Final Plat, and Easement Vacation 1 Attachm ent T •September 11, 2024, City Council approved a preliminary plat and tabled a request for a rezoning for 1700 Highway 96 •Applicant is requesting final approvals •Existing 41.1 0 acre lot to be subdivided to create two parcels •Lot 1, Block 1 – New 119-unit Multifamily Dwelling •Rezoning request from B-1 to R-4, reviewed by Planning Commission on August 7, 2024 •Lot 2, Block 1, Existing House of Worship Background 2 •The Applicant is proposing to construct a three -story multi-family senior living facility with underground parking •119 units •162,819 square feet structure Overview of Request 3 Overview of Request 4 Unit Style Total Square Feet •1-bedroom units 15 (7-15%) 800 - 1,000 +/- •1-bedroom + den 28 (25-30%) 900 - 1,100 +/- •2-bedroom 54 (35-45% )975 -1,200 +/- •2-bedroom + den 22 (17-25%) 1,050 - 1,350 +/- Overview of Request 5 Approvals •A Rezoning was previously tabled at the September 9, 2024, meeting •A PUD is required for requested flexibility •Density •Floor Area Ratio (FAR) •Building Height •The application requires CUP and Site Plan review for a multiple family dwelling use in the R-4 District •City Code Section 1355.04 Subd. 3 – 8 factors for all CUPs •City Code Section 1325.045 – 8 factors specific to multifamily residential •Final Plat for subdivision of property •Easement Vacation for unnecessary easements 6 Final Plat •Subdivision to create two lots •The redevelopment of the site will consist of two buildings that function under shared access •Final plats must be substantially consistent with Preliminary Plats •The submitted Final Plat is substantially consistent with the Preliminary Plat approved by the Council on September 9, 2024 Lot 2, Block 1 Lot 1, Block 1 7 Final Plat •Public Use Dedication •Previous 4.57 acre dedication with PUD for house of worship (1984) •Residential Dedication •Based on 20% of the acres of development or a cash contribution in lieu of land, approximately $1,148,400 •Applicant is not proposing land dedication. The City Council should discuss the City’s discretion for payment in lieu of land dedication for the 10.74 acres as Lot 1, Block 1 •Park Dedication •Applicant proposed to meet park dedication requirements by a payment of cash-in-lieu of land •The per unit fee is currently $6,500 •The Applicant is proposing the development of a 119-unit building for a park dedication fee of $773,500 8 Zoning Regulations Review - Lot 1, Block 1 •Guided High Density Residential (HDR) •9 to 12 units per acre •Applicant has previously requested a rezoning to R-4 •Multiple family dwellings require a CUP Ordinance Requirements R-4 District Standards Proposed Lot 1 Maximum Floor Area Ratio 0.3 0.347 Maximum Structure Coverage 25%12% Maximum Impervious Surface 35%26% Minimum Landscape Lot Area 65%74% Minimum Front Yard Setback 40 feet 96.9 feet Minimum Rear Yard Setback 30 feet 86.5 feet Minimum Side Yard Setback 10 feet (min)/ 15 feet (total) 65.6 feet/ ~ 474 feet Minimum Lot Area (per dwelling unit)3,630 sq. ft.468,025 sq. ft. 3,933 sq. ft. Maximum Building Height 35 feet ~ 38 feet PUD & SUP Maximum Dwelling Unit Density Per Net Acre 12 units 13.9 units 9 Zoning Regulations Review - Lot 1, Block 1 •Guided High Density Residential (HDR) •9 to 12 units per acre •Net residential acreage is calculated by subtracting •Wetlands •Water bodies •Public parks •Arterial streets •Identified natural resources •Density in Narrative does not use net acreage 10 Zoning Regulations Review - Lot 1, Block 1 •The Subject Property contains multiple wetlands •The City Council approved Comprehensive Plan Amendments amending Section 6.4.10, Development Capacity and Net Residential Density •Allows increase in the maximum housing unit density as part of a Planned Unit Development •The Subject Property is part of the boundaries as described in Section 6.4.10 •Density may be increased by up to 100% through a PUD if the intent is to meet the goals of the Comprehensive Plan. Wetland Number Acres (on site) Wetland 8 1.40 Wetland 9 0.40 Wetland 10 0.40 Density Calculation Total Site Acreage 10.75 Total Wetland Acreage 2.2 Net Acres 8.55 Proposed Units 119 Density (Units/Net Acres)13.9 11 Zoning Regulations Review – Lot 1, Block 1 •A floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.3 is permitted within the R-4 zoning district •The Applicant is requesting flexibility through a PUD to construct a building that would create a FAR of 0.35 for proposed Lot 1 12 Zoning Regulations Review – Lot 1, Block 1 •A maximum building height of 35 feet is permitted within the R-4 zoning district •The Applicant is requesting flexibility through a PUD for a with a height of 38 feet with a proposed gabled roof 13 Zoning Regulations Review - Lot 2, Block 1 •The existing House of Worship would be located on proposed Lot 2, Block 1, of the plat •The subdivided lot must still meet the standards established in the City Code •No flexibility is requested for Lot 2, Block 1 Ordinance Requirements R-1 District Standards Proposed Lot 2 Maximum Floor Area Ratio 0.3 0.06 Maximum Structure Coverage 25%7% Maximum Impervious Surface 35%35% Minimum Landscape Lot Area 65%65% Minimum Front Yard Setback 40 feet No Change Minimum Rear Yard Setback 30 feet No Change Minimum Side Yard Setback 10 feet (min)/ 25 feet (total)113.1 feet Minimum Lot Area (per dwelling unit)14,000 sq. ft.1,322,416 sq. ft. Maximum Building Height 35 feet No Change 14 Zoning Regulations Review – Design Standards •Building Positioning – Meets Requirement •The City Code requires setbacks for structures on lots. The proposed and existing structures will meet setbacks •Exterior Materials – Meets Requirement •The R-4 zoning district does not have requirements regarding exterior materials •Section 1325.05 Subd. 6 Aesthetics requires proposed design, scale, massing, materials, height, and other aspects be evaluated by the Planning Commission and the Council with respect to structures and properties in the surrounding area •The Planning Commission and the Council shall consider, prior to the issuance of any permit, whether the appearance of the subject matter would cause a substantial depreciation in the property values in the surrounding area or to unreasonable detract from the appearance of the area or the city as a whole 15 Zoning Regulations Review – Design Standards •Exterior Materials – Meets Requirement •Applicant is proposing a mix of metal lap siding, vertical metal siding, brick veneer, vinyl patio doors and windows, metal accent features, and asphalt shingles •Examples of the proposed building materials are available for review. 16 Zoning Regulations Review – Design Standards •Lighting – Meets Requirement •Direction of lighting to be arranged away from adjoining lots and public streets, that lighting sources be concealed or hooded, and intensity of lighting is controlled at travel lanes of adjoining public streets and on adjoining residential property •The proposed lighting plan includes wall mounted building lighting, flush-mounted lights, and light poles that are downward cast with 90- degree cut offs •The Applicant is also proposing pole lights placed throughout the parking lot 17 Zoning Regulations Review – Design Standards •Landscaping – For Review •All uses in the R-4 District must maintain a landscaped area of 65% •Applicant is proposing a landscaping at 74% •57,460 square feet of plantings, with the rest of the area to be left natural or part of wetlands and ponding areas •At least 10% of the total landscaped area shall be perennials and/or shrubbery •Applicant is proposing perennial and/or shrubbery of approximately 23.63% •Planting islands shall occupy 10% (28,809 sq. ft.) of the parking area •14 proposed parking islands for a total of 43,617 sq. ft. 18 Zoning Regulations Review – Design Standards •Landscaping – For Review •Site contains approximately 21,982 caliper inches of significant trees •Code for the removal of fewer than 10% of the caliper inches of significant trees on the property without requiring mitigation (2198 in.) •The Applicant proposes removing 3,702 caliper inches of trees •Applicant is responsible for mitigation of 1,504 caliper inches •The number of caliper inches of trees required for replanting is a rate of 1:2. •The Applicant proposes 752 caliper inches replaced Tree Mitigation Calculation Caliper Inches of Trees A Existing Significant Trees 21,982 B 10% of Existing Significant Trees 2,198 C Proposed Significant Tree Removal 3,702 D Caliper Inches in excess of 10% (C-B)1,504 E Required Replacement Trees (D x 0.5)752 F Proposed Replacement 752 19 Zoning Regulations Review – Design Standards •Landscaping – For Review •The minimum tree size at time of planting shall be 2.5 caliper inches for deciduous trees •The landscaping plan currently states trees of two caliper inches will be planted on the site •The submitted plans show plantings within drainage and utility easements •These plantings must be moved outside of the easements •A condition to revise the landscaping plans is included to address the above issues •City Code requires a minimum of one tree along the right-of-way for every 50 ft. of public street frontage. •Both the frontages along County Highway 96 and Snelling Avenue North are both heavily vegetated •Additional frontage along State Highway 10 is currently less vegetated and will be impacted by construction •Applicant is proposing 38 trees along 398 feet of abutting right-of-way that will be disturbed. 20 Zoning Regulations Review – Design Standards •Screening – Meets Requirements •When any non-residential use in residential districts by Conditional Use Permit or PUD, such as houses of worship and residential facilities over six adjoins or is located across the street from any single- or two-family residential lot, screening is required •All parking, loading service, utility, and outdoor storage areas shall be screened and buffered from all public streets and adjacent differing land use •Screening exists for the house of worship use on proposed Lot 2 and will not be altered •Existing vegetation and proposed landscaping are proposed for screening from adjacent residential uses for the proposed multiple family dwelling •Trash enclosures will be contained within the underground parking lot, under the proposed building 21 Zoning Regulations Review – Design Standards •Snow Storage – Meets Requirements •Snow storage has not been indicated on the submitted plans •Snow storage areas shall be provided so that the number of parking spaces is not reduced below the minimum required •The City may initiate proceedings to require that snow be hauled off the site if parking and circulation problems related to inadequate snow-removal occur •Parking Setbacks – Meets Requirements •The City Code requires off-street parking spaces to be located a minimum of 20 ft. from the right-of-way of any public street, and 5 ft. for side and rear setbacks •Plans indicate that the Applicant would satisfy the requirements for off-street parking space setbacks 22 Zoning Regulations Review – Design Standards •Number of Parking Stalls – Meets Requirements •Multiple family dwellings require •1.1 per efficiency and 1 bedroom dwelling units •2 for each 2+ bedroom dwelling units •Multiple family dwellings requiring a CUP shall provide a minimum of one enclosed parking stall per dwelling unit •House of worships require 1 for every 3 seats •2,320 seats requires 774 parking stalls •Proposed 866 stalls Units Unit Counts Required Stalls Number of Stalls Provided Parking Surplus 1-bedroom units (1.1 parking stalls)43 48 254 (150 underground) 542 or more bedrooms (2 parking stalls)76 152 Total 119 200 23 Zoning Regulations Review – Design Standards •Traffic Study and Site Circulation – For Review •Two access point to the Subject Property along County Highway 96 and Snelling Avenue North•No changes proposed, shared access •Submitted traffic study shows impact of the intended use on area roadway capacity is expected to be minimal and that no significant issues are expected from a traffic capacity perspective •Applicant has shown in the renderings that the vehicles leaving the multifamily dwelling will be “Left Turn Only” with signage showing “No Right Turn” movements to reinforce traffic patterns towards Highway 96•Condition of approval included 24 Zoning Regulations Review – Design Standards •Traffic Study and Site Circulation – For Review •Applicant has submitted exhibits that detail how emergency vehicles and waste collection vehicles would traverse the site that appear to satisfy requirements •Concerns regarding noise from the surrounding highways impacting future residents within the development were identified as a concern as part of previous reviews •Traffic Noise Assessment has been prepared •The summary of findings within the report found that a higher level of glazing would be required on windows on the proposed multifamily dwelling to meet Minnesota noise rules •The assessment also analyzed the impact of sound on surrounding residential uses and found that the change in noise level would not be easily detectable and no suggestions were made to address this change 25 Zoning Regulations Review – Design Standards •Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation – For Review •Applicant shown pedestrian trails on the northwest side of the proposed apartment building •Pedestrian trails will be connected to the regional county trail system located along the south side of County Highway 96 •Concrete walkways will be constructed internal to the site allowing pedestrian movement to and from the house of worship building •Applicant is proposing bicycle parking as part of this development within the underground parking •Plans show 72 bicycle spaces •City Code requires that multifamily dwellings that require a CUP provide enclosed bicycle parking at a rate of 0.5 spaces for every dwelling unit (59.5 stalls) •Plans indicate that the Applicant would satisfy the requirements for pedestrian and bicycle circulation. 26 Zoning Regulations Review – Design Standards •Freestanding Signs – Meets Requirements •Sign District 3 (i.e. all residential properties zoned R-3 and R-4) for the newly created Lot 1 •Sign District 2 (i.e. all non-residential uses in the R-1 through R-4) for the existing Lot 2 •Applicant has indicated that there will be no signs located on Lot 1 and that the existing sign located near the access to County Highway 96, and located on Lot 2, will be modified and expanded to include a sign to serve the use of Lot 1 27 Zoning Regulations Review – Design Standards •Freestanding Signs – Meets Requirements •Existing sign is internally illuminated •Existing sign will be sign will be expanded to the south. •Limited information regarding the sign has been submitted •If any deviation from the established standards occurs, an additional review may be required 28 Zoning Regulations Review – Design Standards •Multi-family Dwelling Units Additional Conditional Use Permit Criteria •Minimum Unit Size – Meets Requirements •One-bedroom units, 700 square feet minimum •Two -bedroom units, 950 square feet minimum •Proposed 800 square feet for one-bedroom and975 square feet for two-bedroom units •Security Plan – For Review •Security will include surveillance cameras in common areas, exterior areas, surface lots, and underground garages •Controlled access will be used for entrances into the building •Exterior portions of the site will be illuminated through the fixtures shown on the lighting plan •Lighting Plan – Meets Requirements •Parking – Meets Requirements •A minimum of one enclosed parking stall shall be provided per dwelling unit •150 stall provided 29 Zoning Regulations Review – Design Standards •Multi-family Dwelling Units Additional Conditional Use Permit Criteria •Common Area – Meets Requirements •Common area must include a combination of both indoor and outdoor space •15 features and amenities including an indoor community room and an outdoor patio •Efficiency Apartments – Meets Requirements •Number of efficiency units not to exceed 15% of the total number of apartments •The Applicant is not proposing any efficiency apartments •Bicycle Parking – Meets Requirements •Window Coverings – For Review •All windows which are visible to the outside shall be provided with window treatments •The Applicant has not provided any information regarding window coverings •Compliance with the requirements for window coverings will be reviewed as part of an inspection of the building once construction has begun 30 Zoning Regulations Review – Summary Ordinance Requirements R-4 District Standards Proposed Development Minimum Lot Area (per dwelling unit)3,630 sq. ft.468,025 sq. ft. 3,933 sq. ft. Maximum Floor Area Ratio 0.3 0.35 Maximum Building Height 35 feet ~ 38 feet Maximum Structure Coverage 25%12% Minimum Landscape Lot Area 65%74% Minimum Front Yard Setback 40 feet 96.9 feet Minimum Rear Yard Setback 30 feet 86.5 feet Minimum Side Yard Setback 10 feet (min)/15 feet (total)65.6 feet/ ~ 474 feet PUD & SUP Maximum Dwelling Unit Density Per Net Acre 12 units 13.9 units Minimum Parking Requirements (Dwelling, multiple family) 1.1 per efficiency and 1 bedroom dwelling units; 2 for each 2+ bedroom dwelling units (Total Required- 195 spaces) 254 stalls Off-Street Parking Setbacks 20 feet from ROW 10 feet from property lines 119 feet from ROW 10 feet from property lines Lighting Not to exceed one foot candle on the travel lanes of adjoining public streets 0.1-foot candles shown on photometric plan Screening/Fencing Screened from residential uses Vegetative screening along western boundaries Landscaping - Planting Islands 10% of parking area 15% of parking area Landscaping – Tree Mitigation 752 caliper inches required for replacement 752 caliper inches proposed for replacement Trees located in D&U easements Trees >2.5 caliper inches Landscaping – Boulevard and Island Trees Boulevard Trees – 39 Island Trees – 14 Boulevard Trees – 38, Existing Vegetation Island Trees – 24 Pedestrian and Bicycle Circulation Provide circulation plan and bike rack Bicycle parking provided for residents31 Additional Reviews Building Official The Building Official has reviewed the plans and has no additional comments at this time. A Building Permit will be required prior to any construction taking place. Public Works Director/City Engineer The Public Works Director/City Engineer has reviewed the plans. A memorandum has been prepared by the Public Works Director/City Engineer and included as Attachment N. Fire Marshal The Fire Marshal is currently reviewing the plans. No additional conditions have been included at this time. 32 Additional Reviews Ramsey County Ramsey County has reviewed the plans and submitted a statement submitted December 3, 2024, that addresses traffic/access, programming, and permitting. Minnesota Department of Transportation MnDOT provided comments regarding noise standards, the submitted survey, and additional permits that would be require d. United States Fish and Wildlife Service FWL did not provide comments at the time of writing this report. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources The Area Hydrologist stated that the plans appear to be consistent with the requirements, including those for open space and density, in Minnesota rules for residential PUDs in shoreland.33 Planning Commission •The Planning Commission reviewed this application at the December 4, 2024 meeting •The Commission discussed the discretion the City has in reviewing the application, the park dedication fees, traffic controls, the lack of affordable housing in the proposal, the density of the proposal, landscaping and tree management, access to the site, and internal circulation of traffic •The Commission voted 5-2 to recommend denial of Planning Case 24-018 with the following findings: 1. The application is not consistent with the policies within Chapter 6 of the Comprehensive Plan: Land Use, or within and the goals of Chapter 7 of the Comprehensive Plan: Housing, that encourage the incorporation of affordable and life-cycle housing into new development and redevelopment where feasible. 2. The request for additional density, floor area ratio, and building height is not consistent with Section 1355.04 Subd. 3.B of the City Code in that the proposed development does not meet the goals for population density and the orderly development of the neighborhood and the city within the general purpose and intent of this Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Plan for the City. 34 Supplemental Narrative from Applicant •Since the December Planning Commission meeting, the Applicant has submitted a supplemental narrative •The Applicant has stated the goals of the City’s Comprehensive Plans that the feel they are meeting •The Applicant has also stated that they will provide 10 units at 80% or less of the Area Median Income (AMI) – estimated at $336 to $625 per month •To accommodate these affordable units, the Applicant has stated that they would be looking for a cost savings of at least $1,300,000 for the development •The Applicant has proposed this be achieved through a cash contribution or a reduction and/or waiver of City fees and charges •The Applicant has not stated the size or type of unit, nor have they indicated a time when the affordable units would be transitioned to market rate •The Applicant also stated that the flexibility requested for F.A.R, maximum building height, and density are appropriate based on the standards that have been exceeded 35 Supplemental Narrative from Applicant •The City Council has the authority to waive the public use and park dedication fees required with the subdivision of the property as described in Section 1130.08 Public Use Dedications •The City does have additional processes and means to provide financial support or business subsidies to projects that meet specific purposes •This process allows for the City to consider public financing through tax increment financing, tax abatement, bonds, waiver of City fees (excluding building permits), and other forms of public financing, provided a development meets the criteria set within the standards •With the late addition of the affordable units, staff have not been able to evaluate the proposed project under these standards 36 Supplemental Narrative from Applicant •For the project to move forward with any kind of financial support that is detailed within Public Financing Guidelines, the Applicant would need to waive their rights to a timely review under Minnesota Statute 15.99 •The Applicant has already extended this deadline to January 13, 2025, and without their consent to extend, the City must act on PC 24-018 and the tabled request for Rezoning PC 24-015 37 Public Notice •Notice was published in the Pioneer Press on December 24, 2024. Notice was prepared by the City and mailed to property owners within 1,000 feet of the subject property. The City received one comment prior to the Planning Commission opposing the project due to concerns with drainage and building placement. •The City had previously received written comments for the preliminary plat and rezoning review which included concerns regarding traffic generation, noise, drainage, and the number of senior facilities within the City 38 Planning Case 24-018 – Trident Development, LLC. - Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan Review, Final Plat, and Easement Vacation Questions? 39 Page 1 of 9 NEW BUSINESS – 11A MEMORANDUM DATE: January 13, 2025 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Jessica Jagoe, Interim City Administrator FROM: T.J. Hofer, Consultant Planner SUBJECT: Planning Case #24-015, #24-018 – Public Hearing Required Applicant: Trident Development, LLC, Roger Fink Property Location: 1700 Highway 96 West, Request: Rezoning, Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan Review, Final Plat, and Easement Vacation Council Should Consider: Motions to approve, table, or deny the following: • Planning Case 24-015 and the adoption of Resolution 2025-006 for an amendment to the zoning map to rezone 10.74 acres from B-1 Limited Business District to R-4 Multiple Dwelling District at 1700 Highway 96 West. • Planning Case 24-018 and the adoption of Resolution 2025-007 for a Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan Review, Final Plat, and Resolution 2025-008 for an Easement Vacation to subdivide and develop an approximately 41.10-acre property that currently contains a place of worship at 1700 Highway 96 West. Approval of a Master PUD requires an affirmative vote of four councilmembers. Background The Applicant has submitted a land use application for a Master Planned Unit Development (PUD), Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan Review, Final Plat, and Easement Vacation to subdivide and develop an approximately 41.10-acre property that currently contains a place of worship at 1700 Highway 96 West. North Heights Lutheran Church currently owns the Subject Property and contains a single structure that acts as a House of Worship. The property currently has split zoning with a majority of the site zoned R-1 Single Family Residential District and the northwest of the parcel zoned B-1 Limited Business District. The Page 2 of 9 Subject Property is also within the Shoreland Overlay District based on its proximity to Round Lake. The proposed changes to the site would subdivide the property into two conforming lots, to facilitate construction of a 162,819 square foot, 119-unit multiple family dwelling, and construct additional parking for the existing house of worship. The proposed PUD for the land use and proposed flexibility would be exclusive to the proposed Lot 1, Block 1. The Applicant made an application for Preliminary Plat and Rezoning on July 17, 2024. The Preliminary Plat and Rezoning (PC 24-015) was reviewed by the Planning Commission on August 7, 2024, and the City Council on September 9, 2024. A public hearing was held at both meetings for this application. The City Council approved the Preliminary Plat at the September meeting but tabled the Rezoning on based on the need to review the land use application concurrently with the rezoning request. The Preliminary Plat was approved with the following conditions: 1. The Applicant shall submit to the City a land use application for Final Plat within three (3) months after the date of approval of the Preliminary Plat 2. The Applicant shall work with the Rice Creek Watershed District to review future modifications to vacate existing drainage and utility easements as well as proposed newly dedicated drainage and utility easements prior to the submittal of the Final Plat application. Modifications and newly dedicated easements shall be to the satisfaction of RCWD and the City. The three-month deadline for the submittal for the final plat based on the above condition was December 9, 2024. Based on this date, the City extended the review of the rezoning in PC 24-015 to November 12, 2024. The City Attorney has stated that the table rezoning request, PC 24-015, can be considered simultaneously with the current request in PC 24-018. The Applicant initially made an application for Master Planned Unit Development (PUD), Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit (CUP), and Site Plan Review in October of 2024, but the application was deemed incomplete. The Applicant applied again on November 4, 2024, with the addition of an application for Final Plat and Easement Vacation, and the application was deemed complete as PC 24-018. Due to the meeting schedule of the City, the Applicant has also submitted a waiver for their rights to a timely review as required by Minnesota State Statute §15.99, for the Final Plat and Rezoning applications, until January 13, 2025. The Subject Property has access from County Highway 96 to the north and Snelling Avenue North to the east. Properties around the parcel are zoned R-1 Single Family Residential District and POS Parks and Open Space District and are used for residential uses and houses of worship. Since PC 24-018 was heard at the December 4, 2024, Planning Commission meeting, the Applicant has submitted a supplementary narrative detailing a proposal for affordable housing and statements regarding the proposed flexibility. Approvals Planning Case 24-015 1. Rezoning Page 3 of 9 The Applicant is requesting to rezone the 10.74-acre Lot 2, Block 1 parcel from B-1 Limited Business District to R-4 Multiple Dwelling District to be consistent with the site’s guiding as High Density Residential in the 2040 Arden Hills Comprehensive Plan. The rezoning would also provide for the Applicant’s intended use for the parcel as an age-restricted (55+) active senior apartment community with a single three-story building. The evaluation of the proposal is based on the requirements of Chapter 13 – Zoning Code, the District Provisions in Section 1320, and consistency with the adopted Comprehensive Plan. The City Council’s review of this rezoning request should also consider the following: 1. Conformity with Comprehensive Plan 2. Substantive changes that have occurred making the zoning change necessary 3. Demonstration showing that the change is superior to the current Zoning and/or Comprehensive Plan 4. Development conditions or priorities that make the existing Zoning and/or Comprehensive Plan impractical Planning Case 24-018 2. Planned Unit Development The Applicant is requesting flexibility through a Planned Unit Development (PUD) to allow for the proposed development to exceed the maximum density, floor area ratio (FAR), and building height allowed in the High Density Residential (HDR) future land use and R-4 zoning district. This proposal involves both the initial Master Plan PUD and the Final PUD. The narrative describes density and lot size, however, does not do so using net acreage as is required in the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The Applicant has provided details in the Architectural Plans (Attachment G) which shows elevations for the proposed building. The narrative submitted by the Applicant further describes the requests through the PUD. The Applicant has stated they are requesting flexibility from building height to as it “will result in a higher quality development allowing for 9- foot-high ceilings in all dwelling units and a 6:12 roof pitch.” The Applicant has stated exceeding the FAR would lead to a reduction of amenity spaces for the residents.” 3. Conditional Use Permit A “Dwelling: multiple family” (multiple family dwelling) is a conditional use in the R-4 Multiple Dwelling District. Typical factors to consider in the evaluation of the CUP request may be hours of operation, potential noise from the proposed use, lights from vehicles, and on-site traffic. City Code Section 1355.04 Subd. 3 of the Arden Hills Zoning Code lists the criteria for evaluating a CUP. The Planning Commission and City Council should consider the effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, convenience and general welfare of the owners and occupants of the surrounding land and the community, in general, including but not limited to the following factors: 1. Existing and anticipated traffic and parking conditions; 2. Noise, glare, odors, vibration, smoke, dust, air pollution, heat, liquid or solid waste, and other nuisance characteristics; 3. Drainage; 4. Population density; 5. Visual and land use compatibility with uses and structures on surrounding land; 6. Adjoining land values; Page 4 of 9 7. Park dedications where applicable; 8. Orderly development of the neighborhood and the City within the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Development Plan for the City. City Code Section 1325.045 Multi-family Dwelling Units Additional Conditional Use Permit Criteria establishes eight additional criteria to consider for a multi-family dwelling unit CUP. These criteria are: 1. Minimum Unit Size 2. Security Plan Component 3. Lighting Plan Component 4. Parking 5. Common Area 6. Efficiency Apartments 7. Bicycle Parking 8. Window coverings 4. Site Plan Review A site plan review is required for new development or additions in any business, industrial or multiple family zoning districts, for PUDs, and CUPs. 5. Final Plat A Final Plat is required to subdivide property. On September 11, 2024, the City Council approved a Preliminary Plat for the property. 6. Easement Vacation Drainage and utility easements exist on the Subject Property that the Applicant is proposing to vacate the delineation of existing easement boundaries and dedicate new easements as part of the final plat. The vacation and new dedication of easements has been discussed with the City Engineer/Public Works Director and has no additional comments. Rice Creek Watershed District has also reviewed and has no additional comments with the easements as presented. Findings of Fact Planning Case 24-015 Rezoning 1. The Subject Property at 1700 West Highway 96 is located in the B-1 – Limited Business District and R-1 – Single Family Residential Zoning District. 2. The Arden Hills 2040 Comprehensive Plan designates future land use for the Subject Property as HDR, High Density Residential and as P/I, Public and Institutional. 3. The Applicant’s land use application includes a request to rezone the proposed 10.74-acre northwest parcel from B-1 – Limited Business District to R-4 – Multiple Dwelling District. 4. The proposed 10.74-acre parcel would meet the size requirements for lots in the R-4 Zoning District. 5. The 30 +/- acres of developed land on the Subject Property would remain as R-1 – Single Family Residential. 6. The rezoning of the 10.74-acre parcel would resolve a conflict between the Comprehensive Plan and the zoning ordinance. 7. Rezoning requires a public hearing prior to action by the City Council. Page 5 of 9 8. The Planning Commission held a public hearing for this land use application on August 7, 2024. Planning Case 24-018 Planned Unit Development and Conditional Use Permit Findings: 1. The property located at 1700 Highway 96 West is designated for High Density Residential uses on the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. 2. New building construction or site modification identified requires the submittal of a Site Plan Review application prior to construction. 3. For proposals for new construction, redevelopment of a site, and significant modifications to existing sites a PUD is required 4. The PUD process allows for flexibility within the City’s regulations through a negotiated process with a Developer. 5. The Applicant has proposed a Site Plan Review, Master and Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Final Plat, and Vacation in order to construct a 119-unit age-restricted apartment. 6. The Applicant has proposed a Master and Final Planned Unit Development for the development of one approximate 162,819 square foot multiple family dwelling on the Subject Property. 7. The Applicant has proposed additional improvements to the proposed Lot 2, Block 1, to construct additional parking and install landscaping for the existing house of worship use. 8. The Master and Final Planned Unit Development generally conforms to the requirements of the City Zoning Code and design standards. 9. Where the plan is not in conformance with the City Code, the Applicant has requested flexibility. 10. Flexibility through the PUD process has been requested in the following areas: density, floor area ratio, and building height. 11. A public hearing for a Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, and Conditional Use Permit request is required before the request can be brought before the City Council. 12. The Planning Commission held a public hearing for this land use application on December 4, 2024. Options and Motion Language Planning Case 24-015 Rezoning The Planning Commission reviewed this application at their August 7, 2024, meeting. At that time, they recommended approval of the application for a Preliminary Plat and Rezoning by a 6-1 vote. The following are motion language options for the City Council to consider. • Approval with Conditions: Motion to approve Resolution 2025-006 and for Planning Case 24-015 for a Rezoning for the 10.74-acre parcel at 1700 West Highway 96, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by the conditions in the January 13, 2025 Report to the City Council: 1. Approval is subject to the approval of Resolution 2025-007 for Planning Case 24- 018 (Approving a Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan Review, Final Plat) Page 6 of 9 • Approval as Submitted: Motion to approve Resolution 2025-006 and for Planning Case 24-015 for a Rezoning for the 10.74-acre parcel at 1700 West Highway 96, based on the findings of fact and the submitted materials in the January 13, 2025 Report to the City Council. • Denial: Motion to deny Planning Case 24-015 for a Rezoning for the parcel at 1700 West Highway 96, based on the following findings: findings to deny should specifically reference the reasons for denial and why those reasons cannot be mitigated. • Table: Motion to table Planning Case 24-015 for a Preliminary Plat and Rezoning for the parcel at 1700 West Highway 96: a specific reason and information request should be included with a motion to table. Tabling would require an additional waiver of the Minn. Statute. 15.99 review deadline by the applicant. Planning Case 24-018 Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan Review, and Final Plat The Planning Commission reviewed this application at their December 4, 2024, meeting. At that time, they recommended denial of the application for Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan Review, Final Plat, and Easement Vacation, by a vote of 5-2. The following are motion language options for the City Council to consider for the Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan Review, and Final Plat. • Approval with Conditions: Motion to approve Resolution 2025-007 for Planning Case 24- 018 for a Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan Review, and Final Plat for a Multiple Family Dwelling at 1700 Highway 96, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by the conditions in the January 13, 2025 Report to the City Council: 1. The project shall be completed in accordance with the submitted plans as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the Community Development Director, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. 2. Approval is subject to the approval of Resolution 2025-006 for Planning Case 24-015 (Rezoning a 10.74-acre Parcel from B-1 Limited Business District to R-4 Multiple Dwelling District) 3. The Conditional Use Permit and Master Planned Unit Development and Final Planned Unit Development shall expire one year from the date of City Council approval unless a building permit has been requested or a time extension has been granted by the City Council. The City Council may extend the expiration date of such approval upon written application by the person to whom the approval was granted. 4. A violation of any condition set forth in the permit shall be a violation of this Code and shall be cause for revocation of the permit. 5. Prior to the release of the Final Plat for recording, the Applicant shall enter into a Development Agreement. 6. The Final Plat shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a building permit. Page 7 of 9 7. A Master and Final PUD Development Agreement shall be prepared by the City Attorney and subject to City Council approval for the Development. The Master and Final PUD Development Agreement shall be fully executed prior to the issuance of building permits. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a landscape financial security equal to 125% of the cost of the landscaping to be installed on the site shall be submitted. The Applicant must submit a detailed cost estimate for the landscaping so staff can determine the final amount. Landscape financial security shall be held for two full growing seasons. For any landscaping that is not in accordance with the approved landscaping plan at the end of two growing seasons, the Developer shall replace the material to the satisfaction of the City before the guarantee is released. Where this is not done, the City, at its sole discretion, may use the proceeds of the performance guarantee to accomplish performance. 8. A Grading and Erosion permit shall be obtained from the city’s Engineering Division prior to commencing any grading, land disturbance or utility activities. The Applicant shall be responsible for obtaining any permits necessary from other agencies, including but not limited to, MPCA, Rice Creek Watershed District, MnDOT and Ramsey County (i.e., ROW or access) prior to the start of any site activities. 9. The final plans shall be subject to approval by the City Engineer, Building Official, and Fire Marshal prior to the issuance of a grading and erosion control permit and shall be consistent with the memorandum from the City Engineer. 10. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the final plans shall show markings and signage to identify access off the site onto County Highway 96 as “Left Turn Only” with signage showing “No Right Turn.” 11. Final landscaping plans shall be revised to relocated trees outside of any drainage and utility easements and shown with trees with a minimum caliper inch of 2.5 inches. 12. Final grading, drainage, utility, and site plans shall be subject to approval by the Public Works Director, City Engineer, and Community Development Director prior to the issuance of a grading and erosion control permit or other development permits. 13. Upon completion of grading and utility work on the site, a grading as-built and utility as-built shall be provided to the City for review. 14. Heavy duty silt fence and adequate erosion control around the entire construction site shall be required and maintained by the Developer during construction to ensure that sediment and storm water does not leave the project site. 15. The Applicant shall be responsible for protecting the proposed on-site storm sewer infrastructure and components and any existing storm sewer from exposure to any and all stormwater runoff, sediments and debris during all construction activities. Temporary stormwater facilities shall be installed to protect the quality aspect of the proposed and existing stormwater facilities prior to and during construction activities. Maintenance of any and all temporary stormwater facilities shall be the responsibility of the Applicant. 16. All light poles, including base, shall be a maximum of 25 feet in height and shall be shoebox style, downward directed, with high-pressure sodium lamps or LED and flush lenses. 17. All rooftop or ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be hidden from view with the same materials used on the building in accordance with City Code requirements. 18. A separate sign permit shall be required for all signs on the site. 19. Any future trash enclosures shall utilize gates and be constructed on three sides using the same materials and patterns used on the building. Locations shall be approved by the Planning Department. Page 8 of 9 20. The Applicant shall be financially responsible for all applicable water and sanitary charges. Rates applied shall be memorialized in the Development Agreement. 21. All disturbed boulevards shall be restored with sod. All areas of the site, where practical, shall be sodded or seeded and maintained. The property owner shall mow and maintain all site boulevards to the curb line of the public streets. 22. A right-of-way permit shall be required for work performed within the City and/or Ramsey County right-of-way. 23. The Applicant shall provide the City an executed copy of the shared access agreement with North Heights Lutheran Church for the Subject Property that shall be reviewed by the City Attorney and recorded as part of the Development Agreement. 24. All items identified in the November 20, 2024 PW/Engineering Division memo shall be addressed. All comments shall be adopted herein by reference. 25. The proposed structure shall conform to all other regulations in the City Code. • Approval as Submitted: Motion to approve Resolution 2025-007 for Planning Case 24-018 for a Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan Review, and Final Plat for a Multiple Family Dwelling at 1700 Highway 96, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans in the January 13, 2025 Report to the City Council. • Denial: Motion to deny Planning Case 24-018 for a Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan Review, and Final Plat for a Multiple Family Dwelling at 1700 Highway 96, based on the following findings as recommended by the Planning Commission: findings to deny should specifically reference the reasons for denial and why those reasons cannot be mitigated. 1. The application is not consistent with the policies within Chapter 6 of the Comprehensive Plan: Land Use, or within and the goals of Chapter 7 of the Comprehensive Plan: Housing, that encourage the incorporation of affordable and life- cycle housing into new development and redevelopment where feasible. 2. The request for additional density, floor area ratio, and building height is not consistent with Section 1355.04 Subd. 3.B of the City Code in that the proposed development does not meet the goals for population density and the orderly development of the neighborhood and the city within the general purpose and intent of this Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Plan for the City. • Table: Motion to table Planning Case 24-018 for a Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan Review, and Final Plat, for a Multiple Family Dwelling at 1700 Highway 96: a specific reason and information request should be included with a motion to table. Tabling would require an additional waiver of the Minn. Statute. 15.99 review deadline by the applicant. Easement Vacation Below are motion options for the proposed Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easement: • Approval as Submitted: Motion to approve Resolution 2025-008 or a Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easement. Page 9 of 9 • Denial: Motion to deny Resolution 2025-008 for a Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easement: The City Council should identify findings to deny should specifically reference the reasons for denial and why those reasons cannot be mitigated. • Table: Motion to table Resolution 2025-008 for a Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easement: The City Council should identify a specific reason and/or information request should be included with a motion to table. Tabling would require an additional waiver of the Minn. Statute. 15.99 review deadline by the applicant. Deadline for Agency Actions The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on November 4, 2024. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must act on this request by January 3, 2025 (60 days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60-day review period. The applicant has submitted a waiver for the 60-day review requirement for PC 24-015 and PC 24-018, extending the review to January 13, 2025. Budget Impact N/A Attachments A. Resolution 2025-006 Resolution Approving a Rezoning for the Subject Property at 1700 West Highway 96 B. Resolution 2025-007 Resolution Approving a Conditional Use Permit for Lot 2, Block 1, Arden Heights Addition C. Resolution 2025-008 Resolution Vacating Drainage and Utility Easement D. Notice of Completion E. Presentation 1 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2025-006 RESOLUTION APPROVING A REZONING FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AT 1700 WEST HIGHWAY 96 WHEREAS, City Staff received a complete land use application for a Rezoning request on July 17, 2024 from Trident Development, LLC (“Applicant”), for the property located at 1700 West Highway 96 (“Subject Property”) to rezone a 10.74-acre parcel identified as Lot 2, Block 1 Arden Heights Addition, as depicted on the attached Exhibit “A” and highlighted in yellow, from B-1 Limited Business District to R-4 – Multiple Dwelling District; and WHEREAS, Lot 2, Block 1 Arden Heights Addition would meet the size requirements for lots in the R-4 – Multiple Dwelling District; and WHEREAS, Lot 1, Block 1 Arden Heights Addition would remain zoned for and meets the size requirements for lots within the R-1 – Single Family Residential District; and WHEREAS, the rezoning of Lot 2, Block 1 Arden Heights Addition would resolve a conflict between the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must act on this request by September 14, 2024 (60 days); and WHEREAS, the applicant has submitted a waiver of the review deadline required by Minnesota State Statute until January 13, 2025; and WHEREAS, the City Council directed Staff to prepare a Land Use Application Public Policy Notification to notify all property owners within 1000 feet of Subject Property when a request for the Planning Commission is to occur related to a land use application that requires a public hearing; and WHEREAS, the City’s obligation has been met where the Arden Hills Planning Commission duly held a public hearing on August 7, 2024. All persons present at said meeting were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements; and WHEREAS the Planning Commission considered the Applicant’s request for a Preliminary Plat and, as such voted 6-1 in favor of recommending approval with conditions. Attachment A 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS: Hereby adopts Resolution 2025-006 approving Planning Case 24-015 for a Rezoning of the 10.74-acre parcel identified as Lot 2, Lot 1 Arden Heights Addition to the R- 4 – Multiple Dwelling District. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that City Council approves Planning Case 24-015 for a Rezoning of the 10.74-acre parcel on the Subject Property, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans in the January 13, 2025 Report to the City Council, as amended by the following conditions: 1. Approval is subject to the approval of Resolution 2025-007 for Planning Case 24-018 (Approving a Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan Review, Final Plat) PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS THIS 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025. David Grant, Mayor ATTEST: Julie Hanson, City Clerk To view the final document, access adopted Resolutions via Arden Hills Public Laserfiche Weblink by visiting cityofardenhills.org and clicking on Archived Documents under Helpful Links on our main webpage. 3 EXHIBIT “A” TO RESOLUTION NO. 2025-006 1 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2025-007 RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR LOT 2, BLOCK 1, ARDEN HEIGHTS ADDITION WHEREAS, City Staff received a complete land use application for 1700 Highway 96 (“Subject Property”) as part of a Master & Final Planned Unit Development for a Conditional Use Permit on November 4, 2024; WHEREAS, the Subject Property is located in the R-4 Multiple Dwelling District and is guided as High Density Residential in the Land Use plan; WHEREAS, a Conditional Use Permit is required for a vehicle-motorized service in the B-3 Zoning District; WHEREAS, the Applicant has requested as part of the Final Planned Unit Development a Conditional Use Permit in order to allow multiple family dwelling; WHEREAS, the City Council directed Staff to prepare a Land Use Application Public Policy Notification to notify all property owners within 1000 feet of Subject Property when a request for the Planning Commission is to occur related to a land use application that requires a public hearing; WHEREAS, the City’s obligation has been met where the Arden Hills Planning Commission duly held a public hearing on December 4, 2024. All persons present at said meeting were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements; and WHEREAS the Planning Commission considered the Applicant’s request for a Conditional Use Permit and, as such voted 5-2 in favor of denying the request. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS: Hereby adopts Resolution 2025-007 approving Planning Case 24-018 for a Master & Final Planned Unit Development with a Conditional Use Permit at the Subject Property 1700 Highway 96 to allow a multifamily dwelling. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that City Council approves Planning Case 24-018 for a Master & Final Planned Unit Development with a Conditional Use Permit on the Subject Property 1700 Highway 96, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans in the January 13, 2025 Report to the City Council, as amended by the following conditions: Attachment B 2 1. The project shall be completed in accordance with the submitted plans as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the Community Development Director, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. 2. Approval is subject to the approval of Resolution 2025-006 (Rezoning a 10.74-acre Parcel from B-1 Limited Business District to R-4 Multiple Dwelling District) 3. The Conditional Use Permit and Master Planned Unit Development and Final Planned Unit Development shall expire one year from the date of City Council approval unless a building permit has been requested or a time extension has been granted by the City Council. The City Council may extend the expiration date of such approval upon written application by the person to whom the approval was granted. 4. A violation of any condition set forth in the permit shall be a violation of this Code and shall be cause for revocation of the permit. 5. Prior to the release of the Final Plat for recording, the Applicant shall enter into a Development Agreement. 6. The Final Plat shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a building permit. 7. A Master and Final PUD Development Agreement shall be prepared by the City Attorney and subject to City Council approval for the Development. The Master and Final PUD Development Agreement shall be fully executed prior to the issuance of building permits. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a landscape financial security equal to 125% of the cost of the landscaping to be installed on the site shall be submitted. The Applicant must submit a detailed cost estimate for the landscaping so staff can determine the final amount. Landscape financial security shall be held for two full growing seasons. For any landscaping that is not in accordance with the approved landscaping plan at the end of two growing seasons, the Developer shall replace the material to the satisfaction of the City before the guarantee is released. Where this is not done, the City, at its sole discretion, may use the proceeds of the performance guarantee to accomplish performance. 8. A Grading and Erosion permit shall be obtained from the city’s Engineering Division prior to commencing any grading, land disturbance or utility activities. The Applicant shall be responsible for obtaining any permits necessary from other agencies, including but not limited to, MPCA, Rice Creek Watershed District, MnDOT and Ramsey County (i.e., ROW or access) prior to the start of any site activities. 9. The final plans shall be subject to approval by the City Engineer, Building Official, and Fire Marshal prior to the issuance of a grading and erosion control permit and shall be consistent with the memorandum from the City Engineer. 10. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the final plans shall show markings and signage to identify access off the site onto County Highway 96 as “Left Turn Only” with signage showing “No Right Turn.” 11. Final landscaping plans shall be revised to relocated trees outside of any drainage and utility easements and shown with trees with a minimum caliper inch of 2.5 inches. 12. Final grading, drainage, utility, and site plans shall be subject to approval by the Public Works Director, City Engineer, and Community Development Director prior to the issuance of a grading and erosion control permit or other development permits. 13. Upon completion of grading and utility work on the site, a grading as-built and utility as- built shall be provided to the City for review. 14. Heavy duty silt fence and adequate erosion control around the entire construction site shall be required and maintained by the Developer during construction to ensure that sediment and storm water does not leave the project site. 3 15. The Applicant shall be responsible for protecting the proposed on-site storm sewer infrastructure and components and any existing storm sewer from exposure to any and all stormwater runoff, sediments and debris during all construction activities. Temporary stormwater facilities shall be installed to protect the quality aspect of the proposed and existing stormwater facilities prior to and during construction activities. Maintenance of any and all temporary stormwater facilities shall be the responsibility of the Applicant. 16. All light poles, including base, shall be a maximum of 25 feet in height and shall be shoebox style, downward directed, with high-pressure sodium lamps or LED and flush lenses. 17. All rooftop or ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be hidden from view with the same materials used on the building in accordance with City Code requirements. 18. A separate sign permit shall be required for all signs on the site. 19. Any future trash enclosures shall utilize gates and be constructed on three sides using the same materials and patterns used on the building. Locations shall be approved by the Planning Department. 20. The Applicant shall be financially responsible for all applicable water and sanitary charges. Rates applied shall be memorialized in the Development Agreement. 21. All disturbed boulevards shall be restored with sod. All areas of the site, where practical, shall be sodded or seeded and maintained. The property owner shall mow and maintain all site boulevards to the curb line of the public streets. 22. A right-of-way permit shall be required for work performed within the City and/or Ramsey County right-of-way. 23. The Applicant shall provide the City an executed copy of the shared access agreement with North Heights Lutheran Church for the Subject Property that shall be reviewed by the City Attorney and recorded as part of the Development Agreement. 24. All items identified in the November 20, 2024, PW/Engineering Division memo shall be addressed. All comments shall be adopted herein by reference. 25. The proposed structure shall conform to all other regulations in the City Code. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS THIS 13th DAY OF JANUARY 2025. David Grant, Mayor ATTEST: Julie Hanson, City Clerk To view the final document, access adopted Resolutions via Arden Hills Public Laserfiche Weblink by visiting cityofardenhills.org and clicking on Archived Documents under Helpful Links on our main webpage. 1 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2025-008 RESOLUTION VACATING DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 412.851, the Arden Hills City Council has conducted a hearing preceded by two (2) weeks published and posted notice, and mailed notice to the abutting property owners, to consider the vacation of a drainage and utility easement (the “Easement”) described in Document No. 2278852, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the part of the Easement that is proposed to be vacated is legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto, and depicted as the “Easement Vacation Area” on Exhibit B attached hereto; and WHEREAS, following the hearing and consideration of the proposed vacation, the Council has determined that the drainage and utility easement that is proposed to be vacated are not needed for public purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arden Hills: 1. The Easement Vacation Area is hereby vacated within the area described on Exhibit A and depicted on Exhibit B attached hereto. 2. The City Clerk is directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution with the County Auditor and Registrar of Titles of Ramsey County. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS THIS 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025. David Grant, Mayor ATTEST: Julie Hanson, City Clerk To view the final document, access adopted Resolutions via Arden Hills Public Laserfiche Weblink by visiting cityofardenhills.org and clicking on Archived Documents under Helpful Links on our main webpage $WWDFKPHQW& 2 Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2025-008 Legal Description of the Property All of the easements described in Document No. 2278852, Ramsey County, Minnesota 3 Exhibit B to Resolution No. 2025-008 Depiction of the Property 1 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF VACATION PROCEEDINGS NOTICE is hereby given that, following a duly-held public hearing conducted by the City of Arden Hills, the City Council of the City of Arden Hills passed Resolution No. 2025-008 entitled “RESOLUTION VACATING DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT” vacating a public drainage and utility easement as described in Document No. 2278852, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota. Said partially vacated easement is legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto, and depicted on Exhibit B attached hereto as the “Easement Vacation Area.” This NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF VACATION PROCEEDINGS is drafted for presentment to the County Auditor and to the Registrar of Titles of Ramsey County, Minnesota, for filing in compliance with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes § 412.851. This NOTICE is executed this day of , 2025, on behalf of the City of Arden Hills, Minnesota. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS By David Grant, Mayor ATTEST: Julie Hanson, City Clerk $WWDFKPHQW' 2 Exhibit A Legal Description of the Easement Vacation Area All of the easements described in Document No. 2278852, Ramsey County, Minnesota 3 Exhibit B Depiction of the Easement Vacation Area •Planning Case #24-018 –Public Hearing Required Applicant: Trident Development, LLC., Roger Fink Request: Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan Review, Final Plat, and Easement Vacation •Planning Case #24-015 – Public Hearing Required Applicant: Trident Development, LLC., Roger Fink Request: Rezoning 1 Attachment E Actions to Consider •Planning Case 24-015 and the adoption of Resolution 2025-006 for an amendment to the zoning map to rezone 10.74 acres from B-1 Limited Business District to R-4 Multiple Dwelling District at 1700 Highway 96 West . •Planning Case 24-018 and the adoption of Resolution 2025-007 for a Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan Review, Final Plat, and Resolution 2025-008 for an Easement Vacation to subdivide and develop an approximately 41.10-acre property that currently contains a place of worship at 1700 Highway 96 West. Approval of a Master PUD requires an affirmative vote of four councilmembers. 2 Deadline for Agency Action The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on November 4, 2024. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must act on this request by January 3, 2025 (60 days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60-day review period. The applicant has submitted a waiver for the 60-day review requirement for PC 24-015 and PC 24-018, extending the review to January 13, 2025. 3 PC 24-015 Rezoning - Findings 1.The Subject Property at 1700 West Highway 96 is located in the B-1 – Limited Business District and R-1 – Single Family Residential Zoning District. 2.The Arden Hills 2040 Comprehensive Plan designates future land use for the Subject Property as HDR, High Density Residential and as P/I, Public and Institutional. 3.The Applicant’s land use application includes a request to rezone the proposed 10.74-acre northwest parcel from B-1 – Limited Business District to R-4 – Multiple Dwelling District. 4.The proposed 10.74-acre parcel would meet the size requirements for lots in the R-4 Zoning District. 5.The 30 +/- acres of developed land on the Subject Property would remain as R-1 – Single Family Residential. 6.The rezoning of the 10.74-acre parcel would resolve a conflict between the Comprehensive Plan and the zoning ordinance. 7.Rezoning requires a public hearing prior to action by the City Council. 8.The Planning Commission held a public hearing for this land use application on August 7, 2024. 4 Rezoning - Options and Motion Language •Approval with Conditions: Motion to approve Resolution 2025-006 and for Planning Case 24-015 for a Rezoning for the 10.74-acre parcel at 1700 West Highway 96, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by the conditions in the January 13, 2025 Report to the City Council: 1.Approval is subject to the approval of Resolution 2025-007 for Planning Case 24-018 (Approving a Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan Review, Final Plat) •Approval as Submitted: Motion to approve Resolution 2025-006 and for Planning Case 24-015 for a Rezoning for the 10.74-acre parcel at 1700 West Highway 96, based on the findings of fact and the submitted materials in the January 13, 2025 Report to the City Council. •Denial: Motion to deny Planning Case 24-015 for a Rezoning for the parcel at 1700 West Highway 96, based on the following findings: findings to deny should specifically reference the reasons for denial and why those reasons cannot be mitigated. •Table : Motion to table Planning Case 24-015 for a Preliminary Plat and Rezoning for the parcel at 1700 West Highway 96: a specific reason and information request should be included with a motion to table. Tabling would require an additional waiver of the Minn. Statute. 15.99 review deadline by the applicant. 5 PUD, CUP - Findings 1.The property located at 1700 Highway 96 West is designated for High Density Residential uses on the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. 2.New building construction or site modification identified requires the submittal of a Site Plan Review application prior to construction. 3.For proposals for new construction, redevelopment of a site, and significant modifications to existing sites a PUD is required 4.The PUD process allows for flexibility within the City’s regulations through a negotiated process with a Developer. 5.The Applicant has proposed a Site Plan Review, Master and Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Final Plat, and Vacation in order to construct a 119-unit age-restricted apartment. 6.The Applicant has proposed a Master and Final Planned Unit Development for the development of one approximate 162,819 square foot multiple family dwelling on the Subject Property. 7.The Applicant has proposed additional improvements to the proposed Lot 2, Block 1, to construct additional parking and install landscaping for the existing house of worship use. 8.The Master and Final Planned Unit Development generally conforms to the requirements of the City Zoning Code and design standards. 9.Where the plan is not in conformance with the City Code, the Applicant has requested flexibility. 10.Flexibility through the PUD process has been requested in the following areas: density, floor area ratio, and building height. 11.A public hearing for a Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, and Conditional Use Permit request is required before the request can be brought before the City Council.6 PUD, CUP - Options and Motion Language •Approval with Conditions: Motion to approve Resolution 2025-007 for Planning Case 24-018 for a Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan Review, and Final Plat for a Multiple Family Dwelling at 1700 Highway 96, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by the conditions in the January 13, 2025 Report to the City Council: conditions are listed within the staff report and on a later slide. •Approval as Submitted: Motion to approve Resolution 2025-007 for Planning Case 24-018 for a Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan Review, and Final Plat for a Multiple Family Dwelling at 1700 Highway 96, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans in the January 13, 2025 Report to the City Council. 7 PUD, CUP - Options and Motion Language •Denial:Motion to deny Planning Case 24-018 for a Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan Review, Final Plat, and Easement Vacation for a Multiple Family Dwelling at 1700 Highway 96, based on the following findings as recommended by the Planning Commission: findings to deny should specifically reference the reasons for denial and why those reasons cannot be mitigated. 1.The application is not consistent with the policies within Chapter 6 of the Comprehensive Plan: Land Use, or within and the goals of Chapter 7 of the Comprehensive Plan: Housing, that encourage the incorporation of affordable and life-cycle housing into new development and redevelopment where feasible. 2.The request for additional density, floor area ratio, and building height is not consistent with Section 1355.04 Subd. 3.B of the City Code in that the proposed development does not meet the goals for population density and the orderly development of the neighborhood and the city within the general purpose and intent of this Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Plan for the City. •Table : Motion to table Planning Case 24-018 for a Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan Review, Final Plat, and Easement Vacation for a Multiple Family Dwelling at 1700 Highway 96: a specific reason and information request should be included with a motion to table. Tabling would require an additional waiver of the Minn. Statute. 15.99 review deadline by the applicant. 8 Conditions within the December 4, 2024 Report to the Planning Commission 1.The project shall be completed in accordance with the submitted plans as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the Community Development Director, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. 2.Approval is subject to the approval of Resolution 2025-006 for Planning Case 24-015 (Rezoning a 10.74-acre Parcel from B-1 Limited Business District to R-4 Multiple Dwelling District) 3.The Conditional Use Permit and Master Planned Unit Development and Final Planned Unit Development shall expire one year from the date of City Council approval unless a building permit has been requested or a time extension has been granted by the City Council. The City Council may extend the expiration date of such approval upon written application by the person to whom the approval was granted. 4.A violation of any condition set forth in the permit shall be a violation of this Code and shall be cause for revocation of the permit. 5.Prior to the release of the Final Plat for recording, the Applicant shall enter into a Development Agreement. 6.The Final Plat shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a building permit. 9 Conditions within the December 4, 2024 Report to the Planning Commission 7.A Master and Final PUD Development Agreement shall be prepared by the City Attorney and subject to City Council approval for the Development. The Master and Final PUD Development Agreement shall be fully executed prior to the issuance of building permits. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a landscape financial security equal to 125% of the cost of the landscaping to be installed on the site shall be submitted. The Applicant must submit a detailed cost estimate for the landscaping so staff can determine the final amount. Landscape financial security shall be held for two full growing seasons. For any landscaping that is not in accordance with the approved landscaping plan at the end of two growing seasons, the Developer shall replace the material to the satisfaction of the City before the guarantee is released. Where this is not done, the City, at its sole discretion, may use the proceeds of the performance guarantee to accomplish performance. 8.A Grading and Erosion permit shall be obtained from the city’s Engineering Division prior to commencing any grading, land disturbance or utility activities. The Applicant shall be responsible for obtaining any permits necessary from other agencies, including but not limited to, MPCA, Rice Creek Watershed District, MnDOT and Ramsey County (i.e., ROW or access) prior to the start of any site activities. 9.The final plans shall be subject to approval by the City Engineer, Building Official, and Fire Marshal prior to the issuance of a grading and erosion control permit and shall be consistent with the memorandum from the City Engineer. 10.Prior to issuance of a building permit, the final plans shall show markings and signage to identify access off the site onto County Highway 96 as “Left Turn Only” with signage showing “No Right Turn.” 11.Final landscaping plans shall be revised to relocated trees outside of any drainage and utility easements and shown with trees with a minimum caliper inch of 2.5 inches.10 Conditions within the December 4, 2024 Report to the Planning Commission 12.Final grading, drainage, utility, and site plans shall be subject to approval by the Public Works Director, City Engineer, and Community Development Director prior to the issuance of a grading and erosion control permit or other development permits. 13.Upon completion of grading and utility work on the site, a grading as-built and utility as-built shall be provided to the City for review. 14.Heavy duty silt fence and adequate erosion control around the entire construction site shall be required and maintained by the Developer during construction to ensure that sediment and storm water does not leave the project site. 15.The Applicant shall be responsible for protecting the proposed on-site storm sewer infrastructure and components and any existing storm sewer from exposure to any and all stormwater runoff, sediments and debris during all construction activities. Temporary stormwater facilities shall be installed to protect the quality aspect of the proposed and existing stormwater facilities prior to and during construction activities. Maintenance of any and all temporary stormwater facilities shall be the responsibility of the Applicant. 16.All light poles, including base, shall be a maximum of 25 feet in height and shall be shoebox style, downward directed, with high-pressure sodium lamps or LED and flush lenses. 17.All rooftop or ground mounted mechanical equipment shall be hidden from view with the same materials used on the building in accordance with City Code requirements. 18.A separate sign permit shall be required for all signs on the site. 19.Any future trash enclosures shall utilize gates and be constructed on three sides using the same materials and patterns used on the building. Locations shall be approved by the Planning Department. 11 Conditions within the December 4, 2024 Report to the Planning Commission 20.The Applicant shall be financially responsible for all applicable water and sanitary charges. Rates applied shall be memorialized in the Development Agreement. 21.All disturbed boulevards shall be restored with sod. All areas of the site, where practical, shall be sodded or seeded and maintained. The property owner shall mow and maintain all site boulevards to the curb line of the public streets. 22.A right-of-way permit shall be required for work performed within the City and/or Ramsey County right-of- way. 23.The Applicant shall provide the City an executed copy of the shared access agreement with North Heights Lutheran Church for the Subject Property that shall be reviewed by the City Attorney and recorded as part of the Development Agreement. 24.All items identified in the November 20, 2024 PW/Engineering Division memo shall be addressed. All comments shall be adopted herein by reference. 25.The proposed structure shall conform to all other regulations in the City Code. 12 Easement Vacation - Options and Motion Language •Approval as Submitted: Motion to approve Resolution 2025-008 or a Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easement. •Denial: Motion to deny Resolution 2025-008 for a Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easement: The City Council should identify findings to deny should specifically reference the reasons for denial and why those reasons cannot be mitigated. •Table: Motion to table Resolution 2025-008 for a Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easement: The City Council should identify a specific reason and/or information request should be included with a motion to table. Tabling would require an additional waiver of the Minn. Statute. 15.99 review deadline by the applicant. 13 Planning Case 24-015 – Trident Development, LLC. - Rezoning Planning Case 24-018 – Trident Development, LLC. - Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan Review, Final Plat, and Easement Vacation Questions? 14 Page 1 of 3 NEW BUSINESS- 11B MEMORANDUM DATE: January 13, 2025 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Jessica Jagoe, Interim City Administrator FROM: Julie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk SUBJECT: 2025 City Council Liaison Appointments and Mayor Pro Tem Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: $ $ $ Council Should Consider Motions to approve, table, or deny the following: • Resolution 2025-009 Appointing 2025 City Council Liaisons for Commissions and Committees and Mayor Pro Tem. Background/Discussion At its December 9 work session, the City Council discussed liaison assignments to the City’s Committees and Commissions. During that discussion, Council consensus was to remove the Council liaison for Communications and staff received direction on the remaining appointments. Following that work session, staff became aware of a conflict regarding potential appointments to the Lake Johanna Fire Department (LJFD) liaisons; therefore, staff is seeking direction from Council regarding those appointments. Council may wish to discuss splitting the LJFD liaison representatives into three categories as outlined below, or combine into two categories or even one single category. Lake Johanna Fire Department Headquarters JPA Representative Council Liaison: TBD Alternate: TBD Staff: City Administrator Lake Johanna Fire Department Board of Directors Representative Council Liaison: TBD Alternate: TBD Staff: City Administrator Lake Johanna Fire Department Relief Association Representative Council Liaison: TBD Alternate: TBD Staff: City Administrator Page 2 of 3 Below are the City’s other various commission and committee assignments as previously agreed upon at the December work session: Planning Commission Council Liaison: Kurt Weber Staff: Community Development Director Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee (PTRC) Council Liaison: Brenda Holden Staff: Recreation Supervisor Alternate: Assistant Public Works Director Economic Development Commission (EDC) Council Liaison: Emily Rousseau Staff: Senior Planner Alternate: Community Development Director Personnel Committee Council: David Grant Council: Emily Rousseau Staff: City Administrator Staff: City Clerk Joint Development Authority (JDA) Board (First year of a two-year term) Council: Tena Monson Council: Kurt Weber Staff: City Administrator Ramsey County League of Local Government (RCLLG) Council Liaison: Tena Monson Alternates: David Grant, Brenda Holden, Emily Rousseau and Kurt Weber Northeast Youth and Family Services (NYFS) Council Liaison: Emily Rousseau Twin Cities Gateway Council Liaison: David Grant Cable Commission/NineNorth Liaison: Kurt Weber Alternate: City Administrator Beyond the Yellow Ribbon Liaison: Eileen Scott Karth Lake Improvement District Council Liaison: TBD As Needed Staff: Public Works Director Page 3 of 3 Mayor Pro Tem Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.121, Councilmember Tena Monson is appointed Mayor Pro-Tem and is to perform the duties of the Mayor during the absence or disqualification of the Mayor or in the case of a vacancy in the office of the Mayor. Attachments A. Resolution 2025-009 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2025-009 A RESOLUTION APPOINTING 2025 CITY COUNCIL LIAISONS FOR COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES AND MAYOR PRO TEM BE IT RESOLVED by the City of Arden Hills, Ramsey County, Minnesota as follows: Liaisons The following are appointed liaisons as indicated. Planning Commission Council Liaison: Kurt Weber Staff: Community Development Director Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee (PTRC) Council Liaison: Brenda Holden Staff: Recreation Supervisor Alternate: Assistant Public Works Director Economic Development Commission (EDC) Council Liaison: Emily Rousseau Staff: Senior Planner Alternate: Community Development Director Personnel Committee Council: David Grant Council: Emily Rousseau Staff: City Administrator Staff: City Clerk Joint Development Authority (JDA) Board (First year of a two-year term) Council: Tena Monson Council: Kurt Weber Staff: City Administrator Ramsey County League of Local Government (RCLLG) Council Liaison: Tena Monson Alternates: David Grant, Brenda Holden, Emily Rousseau and Kurt Weber Attachment A Page 2 of 2 Northeast Youth and Family Services (NYFS) Council Liaison: Emily Rousseau Twin Cities Gateway Council Liaison: David Grant Cable Commission/NineNorth Liaison: Kurt Weber Alternate: City Administrator Beyond the Yellow Ribbon Liaison: Eileen Scott Karth Lake Improvement District Council Liaison: TBD As Needed Staff: Public Works Director Mayor Pro-Tem Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.121, Councilmember Tena Monson is appointed Mayor Pro-Tem and is to perform the duties of the Mayor during the absence or disqualification of the Mayor or in the case of a vacancy in the office of the Mayor. Lake Johanna Fire Department Headquarters JPA Representative Council Liaison: _________________ Alternate: _________________ Staff: City Administrator Lake Johanna Fire Department Board of Directors Representative Council Liaison: _________________ Alternate: _________________ Staff: City Administrator Lake Johanna Fire Department Relief Association Representative Council Liaison: _________________ Alternate: _________________ Staff: City Administrator ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS THIS 13th DAY OF JANUARY 2025. ____________________________________ David Grant, Mayor ATTEST: ______________________________________ Julie Hanson, City Clerk To view the final document, access adopted Resolutions via Arden Hills Public Laserfiche Weblink by visiting cityofardenhills.org and clicking on Archived Documents under Helpful Links on our main webpage. Page 1 of 1 NEW BUSINESS – 11C MEMORANDUM DATE: January 13, 2025 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Jessica Jagoe, Interim City Administrator SUBJECT: Authorization to Recruit for a Senior Communications Coordinator Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: $94,557 (Grade 13, Step 5) TBD Various Funds Council Should Consider Motions to approve, table, or deny the following: • Discuss recruitment for a Senior Communications Coordinator position. Background The City currently has a vacancy following the resignation of the Senior Communications Coordinator. Below is an example of a typical recruitment process: -Council approves authorization to begin the recruitment process -Staff posts for the position -Staff reviews applications and selects interview candidates and selects a finalist -Staff will bring forward a finalist for official Council approval Council should discuss the potential next steps for recruitment for this position which include authorization to recruit, give staff direction to bring this to the Personnel Committee, or schedule as a future work session discussion to review the job description duties and City communication needs. Councilmembers have previously expressed an interest in being part of the interview panel for certain positions at City Hall; currently no Councilmembers are slated to be on the interview panel for this position. Council may want to discuss if any Councilmembers would want to be designated to participate if there were a motion to authorize recruitment. Budget Impact This position is filling an existing budgeted position and should not adversely affect the budget. Attachments Attachment A: Job Description 1 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS POSITION DESCRIPTION Position Title: Senior Communications Coordinator Department: Administration Accountable to: City Administrator Positions Supervised: None Status: Full-time February 2023 PRIMARY OBJECTIVES The Senior Communications Coordinator is responsible for creating, managing and leading City-wide communication efforts. This position will be charged with long-term strategy, high quality and accurate communication, and marketing projects, as well as, writing and coordinating day-to-day communications activities on behalf of the City, other governmental organizations, media outlets, community groups and citizens. The position will apply professional principles and judgment to lead planning, leadership, and communications for the City of Arden Hills. The Senior Communications Coordinator supports all City departments by directing the City’s communication and marketing efforts to facilitate two-way, symmetrical communication in a manner that reflects the City’s high professional standards. QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS To perform this job successfully, an individual must be able to perform each essential function satisfactorily. The requirements listed below are representative of the knowledge, skill, and/or ability required. Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the essential functions. ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS OF THE POSITION Coordinates the City’s print, digital, cable, and web services to meet the goals, objectives, and timelines of the City Council and departments. Develops communications standards and plans for the strategic goals of the City, and works effectively with each depart to ensure they understand and implement the City’s goals surrounding communication. Develops and directs communication strategies for community engagement activities to improve overall performance, enhance the City’s image, and increase participation and awareness Creates and writes original content and maintain consistent/uniform communications for the City’s news outlets, including the City’s newsletters, press releases, and official mailings, which includes information gathering and interviewing internal staff and external organizations to develop newsletter articles, press releases, website and social media updates, etc. Ensures the City is compliant with Federal, State, and Local laws relating to the City’s communication to include website accessibility for individuals with disabilities (Section 508). Writes, copies, coordinates, and update the City’s website as needed to ensure up-to-date information is being distributed as required. Serves as main system administrator for the website (Civic Plus). Facilitates relationships with the media, and proactively identifies and capitalizes on communication opportunities. Responds to media inquiries at the direction of the City Administrator or responsible Department Head. Attachment A 2 Stays up to date with City activities to include reviewing past and future meetings of the City Council and the City’s other commissions and committees, daily communication with other departments regarding newsworthy items, and monitoring outside news outlets and social media mediums for trending issues related to the City. Leads the efforts in creating, writing, and distributing information regarding the State of the City, open houses, and other informational events put on by the City. Leads in coordinating the communications effort surrounding large projects, specifically, the TCAAP redevelopment project while working with outside parties (other government agencies, real estate development firms, etc.) to ensure a clear and consistent message is presented by the City. Other duties as assigned. EDUCATION and/or EXPERIENCE Bachelor's degree with coursework in communications, journalism, public relations, business administration or equivalent combination of education and experience. Master’s degree preferred. Minimum of five or more years of experience in a communications role. KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS AND ABILITIES Knowledge of the modern principles, practices, and methods involved in planning and implementing a communications program. Practical knowledge of information dissemination, graphic design, and media creation, such as, press releases, internal memos, and content layout. Skilled in desktop publishing, modern office equipment, web maintenance, and related software. Excellent writing skills. The ability to collaborate with other departments and take the lead on special projects. PHYSICAL DEMANDS This work requires the occasional exertion of up to 10 pounds of force; work regularly requires sitting, using hands to finger, handle or feel and repetitive motions, frequently requires speaking or hearing and occasionally requires standing, walking, reaching with hands and arms, pushing or pulling and lifting; work has standard vision requirements; vocal communication is required for expressing or exchanging ideas by means of the spoken word; hearing is required to perceive information at normal spoken word levels; work requires preparing and analyzing written or computer data, operating machines and observing general surroundings and activities; work has no exposure to environmental conditions; work is generally in a moderately noisy location (e.g. business office, light traffic). SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS Valid driver's license. SELECTION GUIDELINES Formal application, rating of education and experience; oral interview and reference check; job related tests may be required. The duties listed above are intended only as illustrations of the various types of work that may be performed. The omission of specific statements of duties does not exclude them from the position if the work is similar, related or a logical assignment to the position. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS IS AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER ___________________________________________________________________ NON-DISCRIMINATION POLICY The City of Arden Hills does not discriminate on the basis of handicapped status in the admission or access to or treatment or employment in its programs and activities. __________________________________________________________________