HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 06-27-1977
.
MINUTES OF REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
Village of Arden Hills
Monday, June 21, 1911 - 1 :30 p.m.
Village Hall
Ca II to Order
Pursuant to due cal I and notice thereof, the meeting was called to
order by Acting Mayor Charles Crichton at 1:32 p.m.
.
REPORT OF VILLAGE ATTORNEY JAMES LYNDEN
Ordinance No. 198 re DOll LicenslnQ and Control - Final Readlno
Lynden referred Councl I to draft of ordinance, and to his letter of
6/24/11 re Proposed Dog Ordinance; noted that ordinance has been read
In Its entirety and Is pending Final Reading.
Woodburn moved, seconded by Wingert, that Counci I approve Ordlnence
Number 198, AN ORDINANCE REGULATING THE OWNERSHIP, KEEPING AND CONTROL
OF DOGS; REQUIRING THE LICENSING THEREOF; PROVIDING FOR THE IMPOUND-
MENT, REDEMPTION, RELEASE AND DISPOSITION OF CERTAIN DOGS; ESTABLISHING
A CITY POUND; PROHIBITiNG CERTAIN NUISANCE ACTiVITIES OF DOGS;
ESTABLISHING A QUARANTiNE PROCEDURE; REQUIRING RABIES VACCINATION;
PROVIDING FOR THE LICENSING OF KENNELS; REPEALH,G ORDINANC~S IN
CONFLICT THf'REWI.TH; AND PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR THE VIOLATiON THEREO::.
In discussion, the following comments were made from ~-l'te floor:
Jim Ross. 4029 N. Falrvlew - opposed particularly to Section 1,
as proposed; punishes the majority of citizens with welf behaved
dogs because of a minority of violations of the existing ordinance;
Invasion of his rights for someone to come onto his property,
seize his dog and Impound it; hoped for an ordinance which Is
more fair; possible It should come to a vote in order to obtain
the feelln.gs of all citizens of the VIllage; Section 1 Is unjust
and unfair; asked whose obligation It would be to notify him
this his dog had been impounded.
.
Jerrv Williams. 4320 Arden View Court - as chairman of Home Owners
Association, spoke In favor of the proposed ordInance; feels
Section 1 Is most appropriate; Home Owners Association has already
adopted a similar ordinance for Townhouse VI lieges at Arden Hills.
Grace Young, 4444 N. Snelling - ordinance can't be too strong;
has en 8 year old girl who cannot speak; has no protective
extension; likes to be out doors, for her protection, feels
that dog ordinance must be very strict.
Irving Lerner, 3915 N. Falrvlew - agreed that Mrs. Young's case
Is an unusual and unique circumstance; there Is a different
problem In the Townhouse area, and in an apartment area, than In
the greater portion of Arden Hills where the density is lower
and where we have no sidewalks, street lights etc.; proposed
ordinance Is repugnant to the concept of the community In wh"ich
he wished to live; we'll lose our home burglary protection.
Lerner said he was prosecuted under the existing ordinance for
a violation; can't understand why It cannot now be enforced.
nt was noted by Council that, In order to enforce either the existing
or proposed ordinance. a paid dog catcher wll I be required; difficult
-1-
Minutes of Regular Council Meeting
Page two
June 27, 1977
.
to prove whether dog is "under control" (existing ordinance); pollee
department does not have method 0 f catch I ng a dog "at large";
transportation of dog to pound, when caught, is difficult In a squad
car (especially when Interrupted for other pollee duties). Councl!
noted that If the Arden Hi lis ordinance is Identical to that of either
Shorevlew or New Brighton, Arden HI I Is could join with either City
for dog patro I.
Wingert noted that New Brighton reports a positIve response from
most residents of New Brighton; object of the ordinance is to enable
City to eliminate the dog nuisances.
J. Ross noted that If a dog catcher Is permitted to enter a person's
yard and seize a dog, we are all "losing something we have In these
United States"; laws should not be passed recklessly; no person should
be frightened by roving bands of dogs, but everybody should not be
punished because of a minority of violators.
Hanson spoke against the proposed ordinance: a poor way to make a law
just because It Is easier to enforce; not sure that present ordinance
cannot be enforced. Mr. Ross has said It all: most onerous part Is
to pick up a well-behaved animal on his own property; Incomprehensible
that surrounding communities can pass such an ordinance; up to the
citizens to report offending citIzens: feels we should stay with the
existing ordinance and ask If other communities will work with us
on that basis.
Crichton said that "running at large" Is difficult to determine, but
agreed that we probably have not tried hard enough to enforce the
existing ordinance.
Milton Sawyer, 1630 Glenvlew Court - said he recognizes there are
some problems; Mr. Hanson has covered his feelings and his
considerations very well: should not be yard littering etc. but
Section 7 Is like trying to drive a tack with a sledge hammer;
a poor law: let's post all streets at 3 m.p.h., then we won't
have any accIdents: let's enforce the present ordinance; citizens
make formal or Informal complaint when appropriate; Section 7
Is not workable.
Woodburn proposed a compromise:
.
A Community Service Officer for Arden Hil Is, over which the City
would have more control than If under a joint program with
another city: officer could patrol for approximately 20 hours
per week, which was anticipated If patrolled by the New Brighton
patrol, and could also do other community service projects:
I. property watch of homes whl Ie resident Is out of town
2. evening patrol for dogs and property watch, as wel I as
during day time hours.
3. operation i.D. could be encouraged for al I residents
by this officer.
4. could talk to residents re dog ordinance requirements;
Issue a warning ticket, If necessary, which may be
sufficient.
Crichton noted that the City would need a vehicle foO" this officer, a
cost factor: noted fhat the proposed ordinance Includes other changes
such as life-time licensing, rabies shots, clean-up requirements,
c()ntrol of howling and barking dogs etc., which are not covered In the
existing ordinance.
Bob TaQtow, 1737 Crystal Aven~ - speaking as a resident and as
Chairman of th. Public Safety Committee, said that the key to
the ordinance Is enforcement: a patrol service for Arden Hills will
be expensive; coul.d start with a contract service; from the
standpoint of safety, suggested that City should not walt until an
accident or unfortunate Incident takes place before the ordinance
I.s enforced; unfortunate that many times nothing Is done until
there Is a human cry for something to be done after the fact.
-2-
Minutes of Regular Council Meeting
Page th ree
Bill Newham, 1786 Glenvlew Avenue - said that a dog catcher during
the day Is almost useless; needed during the evening hours and at
night when the dogs are let out and are running; objected to the
proposed ordinance which would not permit him to run his dog In
the open areas of the vi Ilage; objects to the proposed ordinance;
ordinance should also include cats, which can be as much of a
nuisance as dogs,
June 27, 1977
.
Crichton moved that the motion be amended to substitute Section 12 of
existing ordinance No. 17, In place of Section 7, with appropriate
reference changes. Motl.on was seconded by Hanson. Amendment to the
motion carried unanimously.
In further discussion re cost of enforcement, J. Ross commented that the
community officer, as proposed by Woodburn, would be an excel lent way
to enforce the ordinance; likes a life-time license, but an annual
license probably would help to cover the cost of enforcement; there wll I
be some revenue from Section 18, If the City pervalls; could Issue
tickets for unlicensed dogs.
Dianne McAllister. 1200 Ingerson Road - said she doesn't mind an
annual license fee; would like to get her dog back, If It should
get away; feels most dog owners can afford the license fee.
Woodburn moved that the ordinance be amended as follows:
I. Title Changed to add "Amending Ordlnence 164".
2. Section I. Definitions
(b) Kennel. "... for pleasure or profit three (3) or lllOre
dogs, older than six (6) months, shall be deemed .. .."
3. Section 2. Transition; Two-Year License Required; Fee.
Change wording In paragraph 2 from "permanent" to "for two
(2) years" and change fee from "Five Dollars ($5.00)" to
"Ten Dollars ($10.00).; delete "during Its life" (5th line,
Section 2)
4. Section 12. Howling and Barking. .
Add to last sentence "and provided complaint has not been
withdrawn by either party".
5. Section 15. Muzzling Proclamation,
Change "hydrophobia" to "rabies".
6. Section 17.
Revise according to Attorney's letter of 6/24/77.
Motion was seconded by Wingert, and motion as amended, carried
unanimously.
Council referred the Ordinance, as adopted, to the Public Safety Committee
and Acting Police Chief for recommendations re enforcement.
Case No. 77-14. Special Use Permit for Town Crier Pancake House
Restaurant.
Lynden referred Council to a draft of the Special Use Permit - Case
No. 77-14.
. In discussion the following changes were made:
paragraph 3 - change "Arden Hills" to "Rosevl I Ie", Minnesota.
condition 6 - Contribution of "a sum, as approved by the Council"
Instead of a "$ "
Wingert moved, seconded by Hanson, that the Counci I approve the Special
Use Permit - Case No. 77-14, as amended. Motion carried unanimoUSly.
Case No. 77-21. Amended SpeCial Use Permit for Addition to Minnesota
Baptist Conferenc$ Sui Idlng.
Lynden referred Council to draft of Special Use Permit - Case No. 77-21,
noting that It should read Amended Special Use Permit - Case No. 77-21.
Wingert moved, seconded by Hanson, that Council approve the Amended
Special Use Permit - Case No. 77-21. Motion carried unanimously.
-3-
Minutes of Regular Counc! I Meeting
Page fou r
June 27, 1977
MWCC Industrial Stren~th Charae
lynden referred Council to his letter of 5/27/77.
Council discussed Its previous concerns re MWCC's authority to force
Arden Hi lis to pass an ordinance to collect charges from certain users
Imposed by MWCC; Arden Hills should be permitted to decide how to pass
the charges on to the user; Arden Hills already has an ordinance
which controls types of wastes which may be discharged Into the sewers
and provides that supplemental charges may be Imposed by the City for
sewage wastes which, by virtue of their strength and volume, are
... subject to such charge.
Hanson referred Councl I to an article "Three Indicted for Fouling
Sewer System", for Council's Information.
.
After discussion, It was moved by Crichton that Council authorize
McNlesh and lynden to draft a Resolution Informing MWCC that Arden HI lis
will recover the industrial strength charges If MWCC will advise
Arden Hills of what they are; authorizing its execution by the Mayor
and Clerk Administrator. Motion was seconded by Wingert and carried
unanimously.
Hlohwav 51 Easement - Cummlnrs Park
lynden referred Council to h s letter of June 24, 1977.
Woodburn moved, seconded by Wingert that Council approve the $8,655
payment to the Commissioner of TransportatIon for purChase of the
easement ab,uttlng Cummings Park. Motion carried unanimously.
Fire Protection Contract
lynden was requested by Council to discuss the contract with Attorney
Filla re wording to adjust for changes In assessed valuation cal-
culations, each village is to review it; Intent is to have a contract
which Is agreeable to all 3 Cities as well as the fire department.
Resolution No. 77-26
Wingert moved, seconded by Woodburn, that paragraph 3 of Resolution
No. 77-26 be amended to read"... to represent the City and Council
members in this matter, and" Motion carried unanimously.
After discussion of letter from Pierre N. Regnier, dated 6/21/77,
Hanson moved, seconded by Woodburn, that Coun~ll has no objection to
the Intervention. Motion carried unanimously.
REPORT OF VilLAGE ENGINEER DONALD CHRISTOFfERSEN
Bids for Improvement No. 77-1 (Chatham) - Resolution No. 77-28,
AwardlnQ Bid
Christoffersen referred Council to Tabulation of Bids for Improvement
No. 77-1 (Chatham), noting that eleven bids were received ranging from
II low of $633,041.81 to a high of $790,541.70; recommended that the
contract be awarded to the low bidder, C.W. Houle landscaping Co., Inc.
Christoffersen reported that a letter (6/24/77) from Mr. Hans T. Hagen,
Jr., President of Ban-Con, inc. has been received requesting that the
Clty award the contract to C.W. Houle.
Wingert moved, seconded by Hanson, that Council adopt Resolution No.
77-28, RESOLUTION AWARDJNG BID FOR iMPROVEMENT NO. SS-W-P-77-I, which
awards the contract to C.W. Houle Co. of St.Paul~ Minnesota at
$633,041.81. Motion carried unanimously.
Christoffersen described the re-routlng of the sewer main, which he has
discussed with ~r. LIssner (Bethel College);lissner agrees that the
change Is appropriate; sewer will now join existing sewer north of
County Road E2, on the west ~ide of Old Highway 10.
RoutlnQ of Pathway
Mr. Hagen reported that Parks Director Buckley has scheduled a meeting
with the Ban-Con surveyor; Ban-Con wi II subsequently pursue obtaining
-4-
Minutes of Regular Council Meeting
Page five
June 27,-1977
certain corner areas from Soo Line; noted that all necessary easements
will be added to "hard shell" of plat, before it Is executed.
Lift Station No.5 Revisions - Bid Award
Christoffersen referred Council to his letter of 6/21/77.
Woodburn moved, seconded by Wingert, that Council award the contract
to the low bidder, Metro Engineering, Hamel, Minnesota, in the amount
of $69,937.00 for Lift Station No.5 Revisions. Motion carried
unanimously.
.
Case No. 77-11. Janet Estates
A. Feasibility Report
Christoffersen referred Council to the Feasibility Report of
Janet Estates and to the 5 recommendations outlined in the
report letter (6/24/77).
After discussion, Engineer Dolan advised that the developer has decided
to construct the streets and utilIties, rather than pursue construction
by the City; wi I I post the required bond and enter Into a Development
Agreement with the City: will reimburse City for Engineering costs
Incurred In feeslbl Ilty report. Dolan said that construction will be
In accord with plans and specifIcations approved by the City Engineer
as per Feasibility Report submitted.
B. Janet Estates ~ Flnel Plat Approval
Wingert reviewed the Final Plat of Janet EstateS (presented
to the Planning Commission on 6/7/77) which Incorporates Lot
8, Block 2 (formerly Lot 3, Houle AddItion) and provides
direct access to lot 7, Block 2 from the ValentIne Crest Road
cul-de-sac.
Attorney Lynden noted that he has not, to date, rendered a
Title OpInion on this plat, which Is required by the Sub-
division Ordinance: has not received the abstract. Dolan
said he Is not aware of this but will notify Skyline Builders
of the requIrement.
in discussion re changes which wi II be required, as the result of the
Feasibility Study, Dolan said that he will submit a surveyor's
certificate at the tIme of signing, If Council would like, indicating
that all the lots are 14,000 sq. ft. or more: one line will have to
be moved on the Flna! Plat which was submitted for approval.
Christoffersen noted that the south 15 feet of lots I, 2, 3,4, Block
I and lots 6 & 7, Block 2, be dedicated for public easements, along
with the north 15 feet of outlot A (uti Ilty easements).
Dolan agreed that these modifications ere in order - have already
shown the easements on the plat submitted.
Berm cover of the proposed sewer line and drainage of the plat was
.. described by Christoffersen.
After discussion, Wingert moved, seconded by Woodburn that Councl I
approve the Final Plat of Janet Estates with the following contingencies:
I. Posting of the necessary bonds and execution of a Development
Agreement approved by the City Attorney.
2. Plat to be re-drawn to show the changed street alignment and
subsequent lot line adjustments.
3. Construction of the streets and utilities to be in accordance
with the Feasibility Study prepared by the City Engineer.
4. Open natural dralnageways to remain open for surface drainage
untl I the underground drainage system .1 s complete.
5. Satisfactory resolution of park dedication.
6. Reimbursement of City Engineering costs for preparation of
Feasibility Study.
Motion carried unanimously.
-5-
Minutes of Regular Councl I Meeting.
Pa ge s I x
June 27, 1977
(Christoffersen noted that Outlot A is important for drainage purposes.
WIngert agreed to negotiate the park dedication with the developer).
Resol utlon 77-29 re Improvement 75-1 (County Road F)
Engineer Christoffersen reviewed the project costs of the County Road
F Improvement Project, total cost of which Is $193,860.00.
In discussion re assessment for the project, Christoffersen noted
that:
.
I: The storm sewer costs ($58,300) Is expected to be shared by
Shorevlew In the amount of $11,000.
2. Sanitary sewer ($2,800) Is for construction of 4 services.
3. Water ($2,700) is for construction of water pipe under the road;
of no benefit to property owners at present.
4. Street ($130,000) - solely surrounded by Industrial property.
After discussion, Counci I requested Christoffersen to prepare several
assessment approaches for Counci l'S consideration at the July 11th
meeting. Christoffersen to work with Woodburn on alternate approaches.
Resolution No. 77-30 re Little Crow Improvement Decl8rin~ Cost and
OrderlnQ Preparation of Assessment Roll.
Christoffersen noted that the job has not been finalized; estimated
cost of the Improvement is $22,512.00 which Is the amount proposed to
be assessed.
McNlesh noted that assessment amount can, according to Popovich's
office, be adjusted between adoption of the Resolution Declaring Cost,
and the publication of Notice of the Assessment Hearing, which states
the cost of the Improvement; also, Resolution can be amended.
After discussion, Hanson moved, seconded by Wingert, that Counci I adopt
Resolution No. 77-30, RESOLUTION RELATING TO LITTLE CROW ADDITION
IMPROVEMENT DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT, at $22,512.00. Motion carried unanimously.
Resolution No. 77-31, Approving Plans and Specifications and Ordering
Advertisement for BIds for Improvement No. 77-2 (Edgewater South and
HelQhts of Johanna Lake).
Developers Marlyn Tramm and Barry O'Meara stated they are satisfied
wlth the Plans and Specifications for the two developments.
Woodburn moved, seconded by Wingert, that Council adopt Resolution
No~ 77-31, RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING
ADVERTISEMENT fOR BIDS ON IMPROVEMENT SS-W-P-77-2. Motion carried
unanimously. (Advertise June 30, July 7; bid opening July 22nd,
2:00 p.m.)
Application for Payment No.3, C.W. Houle - County Road F Improvement
Deferred to July 11th Councl I Meeting.
.
REPORT OF PARKS DIRECTOR JOHN BUCKLEY
Approval of Tree Inspector Stephen Flackey
Wingert moved, seconded by Hanson, that Council approve the hi ring of
Stephen Flackey as Tree Inspector at $4.75/hour, effective June 17,
1977. Motion carried unanimously.
Park Dedication Recommendations - Buesing Property
Buckley reported that the Parks and Recreation Committee discussed
park dedication for the Buesing property with realtor Clarence Rexelsen
at Its June meeting. Committee does not recommend City purchase of
Lot F as proposed by Rexelsen for access to the Highway easement from
Hamllne area.
Crichton Indicated the Committee's recommendation cross~h8tched on a
sketch of the Buesing property; noting that a 25' wide pathway Is
desired from Hamllne Avenue, at the 970 elevation, to the Highway
Easement area to the east; (Councilman Hanson left the meeting at
about 11:00 p.m.); at least 25' to 50' wide pathway desired within
the Highway Easement area. (See drawing).
-6-
Minutes of Regular Council Meeting
Page seven
Council was referred to a letter from Buesing which Indicates that
Buesing Is the underlying property owner of the entire Highway 51
easement adjacent to hIs property (Llv-A-Snaps do not have a deed to
include the east half of the right-of-way).
June 27, 1977
.
Woodburn moved that Council approve the spl It of the Buesing property
as per Map "Z", Into four (4) parcels; parcel No.4 to be dedicated
to the City of Arder Hi lis in partial fulfillment.of the park dedI-
cation requirement (recognizing that further park land will be re-
quired to fulfill belance of park dedication); no development of
parcels No. I and Ne.. 3 to be permitted until balance of park dedica-
tion Is satisfactorily resolved; parcel No.3 to be consolidated with
the adjacent property to the north. Motion was seconded by Wingert
and carried unanimously. (Hanson had left meeting before vote was
taken)
(Lynden to draft agreement re the spilt and park dedication to be
signed by Buesing).
Shade Tree Grant ProQram
Buckley referred Council to his memo of 6/24/77 re Minnesota Shade
Tre~ Grant; noted that grant application must be received by State
Office by July I, 1977 If City Intends to participate this year.
After discussion, Crichton moved, seconded by Wingert, that Council
apply for the Shade Tree Grant for the City diseased tree program In
the amount budgeted In 1977 plus cost of removing trees on public
property. Motion carried. Crichton and Woodburn voted In favor of
motion, Wingert abstained.
Woodburn moved that CIty not participate In the $40.00/tree reforestation
program. Wingert seconded the motion. Motion did not carry, Woodburn
voting In favor) Crichton and Wingert voting In opposition.
Woodburn moved that City include planned planting of trees, up to
appropriate limits; .econded by Wingert. Motion carried (Wingert
and Crichton voting In favor of the motion) Woodburn voting In opposition.
Council directed Buckley to prepare a plan for sharing costs of
diseased tree removal for the 1978 Budget for Council's consideration;
suggested that 2 or 3 alternate proposals be submitted.
Health Insurance
Crichton moved, seconded by Wingert, that Councl I authorize that
normal Health Insurance dependent coverage be re-Instated for John
Buckley, to be effective at the earliest appropriate date. Motion
carried unanimously.
Hunters Park Path~!AY.
Council discussed the proposed sale of the Hunters Park Pathway property
to 10 adJaCent property owners as per drawing, and attached letter
dated 6/17/77 iron Robert A. Curtis, Homeowner's Representative,
Hunte rs Park.
.
After discussion, Council referred the proposed sale to Attorney Lynden
to determine the best way to accomplish the consolidation of the
portions of the ~athway property wIth the lots as Indicated In the
draw I ng.
McNlesh was reqllested to obtain the cost of the property at time
Dreyfus purchased the site.
OTHER BUSINESS
Case No. 77-22. Lot Spilt - Buesing Property
See above Report of Parks Director Buckley re Park Dedication
Recommendations - Buesing Property.
Case No. 77-23, '.ot Spilt
William Day.
Wingert moved, seconded
spilt of parcel #2 of the
and Special Use Permit for Double Bunqalow-
by Woodburn, that Counc! I approve the lot
Buesing property, as per survey prepared by
-7-
Minutes of Regular Counci I Meeting
Page eight
June 27, 1977
Charles O. Georgi Company, dated May, 1977 and submitted with Case
No. 77-23. Motion carried unanimously.
(It was noted that this spilt Is not subject to park dedication).
Wingert moved, seconded by Woodburn, that Council approve a Spe~lal
Use Permit for the construction of a double bungalow on the center
lot of the survey. Motion carried unanimously.
.
Mr. Day stated he anticipates no variances on the 3 lots. Council
noted that approval of a double bungalow on this one lot does not
imply that they wi II be approved on other lots In this area. Crichton
stated that he would not be in favor of another double bungalow In
the Immediate neighborhood.
REPORT OF CLERK ADMINISTRATOR CHARLOTTE MCNIESH
itinerant Vendor Permit - CulllQan Water Service
Wingert moved, !,econded by Crichton, that Council approve the permit
for Culligan Water Service for the balance of 1977, at the times noted
in the application. Motion carried unanimously.
Resolution No. 77-27 re Scanner
Crichton moved. seconded by Woodburn. that Councl I approve Resolution
No. 77-27, as submitted. Motion carried unanimously.
Case No. 77-30. Preliminary Plat of Valentine lake View No.3 -
Schedule Public HearlnQ
Wingert moved, {.econded by Woodburn, that Council schedule a public
hearing re Case No. 77-30, Preliminary Plat of Valentine lake View
No.3, before the Planning Commission on Tuesday. July 5, 1977 at
8:00 p.m. Motion carried unanimouSly.
Apportionment of Assessments - Flaherty/Arden Properties
After discussion, Wingert moved, seconded by Woodburn. that Councl I
adopt Apportionment of Assessment Resolutions No. 77-32, 77-33, 77-34
and 77-35. Motion carried unanimously.
Permit for Fireworks Display - North lake Josephine Improvement Society
Wingert moved, seconded by Crichton, that Councl I approve a permit for
fireworks display for the North lake Josephine Improvement Society,
on July 4. 1977 between the hours of 7:00 p.m. and 10:30 p.m. at
1252 Ingerson Road. Motion carried (Wingert and Crichton voting In
favor of the motIon; Woodburn abstainIng).
.
Payroll .
Crichton moved, seconded by Wingert. that Counc:l I approve the Payroll
as submitted. Motion carried unanimously.
Home .Imp rovement Grant Prollram
McNlesh referred Council to her memo of June 24. 1977, and attached
Re'solutlon, notlngth8t CIty's response must be received by July 1st
If City wishes to partlclp8te.
Wingert moved, seconded by Crichton, to adopt Resolution No. 77-36,
RESOlUTijON REQUESTING AND AUTHORIZING THE METROPOLITAN COUNCil HOUSING
AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY TO APPLY FOR REHABiliTATION GRANT FUNDS
fOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE HOME IMPROVEMENT GRANT PROGRAM WITHIN THE
CITY Of ARDEN HillS. Motion did not carry (Wingert voting In favor
of the motIon; CrIChton votIng In oppositiOn; Woodburn abstaining).
Matter to be deferred to next meeting when full Council Is present.
Approval of Postalle Check
Woodburn moved, seconded by Wingert, that Councl I approve the Issuance
of cheCk No. 10017 In the 8mount of $335.55. Motion carried unanimously.
OlscusslDn re Improvement fundlnll
Woodburn bdefly discussed possibility of including County Road F
costs in future bond Issue to improve cash flow. Matter deferred
pending Popovich report.
-8-
MInutes of Regular Council Meeting
Page nine
June 27, 1977
AdJournment
Woodburn moved, seconded by Wingert, that the meeting adjourn
at I :22 a.m.
\
.
~_W}/fj~
Charlotte McNlesh,
Clerk Administrator
Cf2I4 ~ ~
Charles Crichton,
Acting Mayor
Notice of MeetlnQ
The next Regular Council
1977 at 7:30 p.m. at the
Meeting wI II be held on Monday, JUly II,
V I I t age Ha I I .
.
la
-9-