Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 08-23-1976 , , .. . 'M~NUTES OF SPECIAL COUNC~L MEETING Vi Ilage of Arden Hi I Is Monday. August 23, 1976 - 7:30 p.m. V i I I a ge Ha I I Ca II to Order Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Crepeau called the meetIng to order at 7:30 p.m. Roll Call Present - Mayor Henry J. Crepeau, Jr., Counci Imen Charles Crichton, Robert Woodburn, James Wingert. Absent - None. Also Present - Bond Counsel Peter Popovich, Treasurer Donald Lamb, Engineer Donald Christoffersen, Public Works Supervisor Hans Johansen, Clerk Administrator Charlotte McNlesh, ... Deputy Clerk Dorothy Zehm. Approval of Minutes Woodburn moved, seconded by Wingert, that the Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of August 9, 1976, be approved as amended. Motion carried unanimously. Woodburn moved, seconded by Wingert, that Council reconsider the approval of the Minutes of August 9, 1976. Motion carried unanimously. Crichton moved, seconded by Wingert, that Councl I approve the Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of August 9, 1976. as previously amended; also deleting, in its entirety, the item on page 8 pertain- ing to Temporary Occupancy of Mobile Home. Motion carried unanimously. Woodburn moved, seconded by Wingert, that Council approve the placing and temporary occupancy, of a mobile home on the LaNasa premises (not on the streetl at 3153 Shoreline Lane. for a period of up to 6 months, during house reconstruction following extensive fire damage on July 27, 1976. Motion carried unanimously. BUSINESS FROM THE FLOOR Presentation of AAA Pedestrian Safety Award Alice Shi Ilock presented the AAA Pedestrian Safety Award to Mayor Crepeau for his acceptance on behalf of the citizens, Police Department and Councl I of Ardon Hills for ~avlng no pedestrian fatalitIes In 1975. Mayor Crepeau thanked Ms. Shlllock and AAA for the award, stating that Arden Hills wIll continue to strive for the award In 1976 and future years; accepted bumper stickers, on beha~f of Police Chief Pat Sexton, for use by the Pol!ce Department. PUBLIC HEARiNG: Assessments for Indian Oaks Two Addition Mayor Crepeau opened the Public Hearing re Assessments for Indian Oaks Two Addition at 7:44 p.m. . (Minutes of Public Hearing attached to Clerk's official copy of Minutes.) Crlch~on moved, seconded by Wingert, that the Public Hearing be closed at 7:~8 p.m. and that Council adopt Resolution No. 76-39 amending the assessment roll as recommended by the City Engineer. Motion carried unanimously. Woodburn moved. seconded by Crichton, that Council pass Resolution No. 76-40, adopting and confirming *he assessment roll 6$ amended. Motion carried unanimously. REPORT OF PUBLIC WORKS SUPERVISOR HANS JOHANSEN Approval of O.J.T. Part-time Employee Johansen referred Council to his memo of 8/13/76, recommending the continued employment of Car! Karth under the O.J.T. Program through the 1976-1977 school year. Crichton moved. seconded by Woodburn, that Council authorize the con- tinued employment of Carl Karth as a.J.T. student @ $2.50/hour through December 31, 1976. Motion carried unanimously. -1- ,Minutes of Special Counci I MeeTing Page two August 23, !976 State Frontage Road Convey~~ Johansen reported that the Public Works Committee recommends Council acceptance of six State Frontage Roads, which the City currently maintains, and referred Counci I to letter from Engineer ChrIstoffersen dated 8/10/76. In discussion, Council expressed concern re replacement cost of these frontage roads; and determined that costs would exceed benefits to the City;, therefore, requested Johansen to notify the State Highway Department that Arden Hili s does not des,i re to accept the conveyance of the six frontage roads at this tlme~. L , . State-aid Road Designation Johansen referred Council to Engineer Christoffersen's letter of 8/11/76 re M.S.A. Street Deslgnatbn, advising that any streets Arden Hills wishes to designate this year should be in preliminary form and sent to the State during the first part of September. Crichton suggested en amended State-aid road designation plan to Council for Its consideration, which would increase road de~~~a~ncto within, .M miles ,ot the p'ermltted ml f~age fqr Arden Hi I!s.t".W~~ A.u.- ~~~~~r"'1l,~e6' "#' After revl6w of several alternate plans and discussion, Council author- Ized Engineer to prepare Resolution adopting change In State-aid road designation for Arden Hills, as per amended map. Crichton moved, seconded by Wingert, that Councl I adopt Resolution No. 76-41, authorizing the change In State-aid road designation and authorizing Its execution by the Mayor. Motion carried unanimously. REPORT OF VILLAGE ENGINEER DONALD CHRISTOFFERSEN Bids for Hamllne Avenue Improvement Christoffersen referred Council to the bids received tor the Hamllne Avenue up-grading project (leveling co~rse, seal-coating and shoulder along the west side of the road); recommending that Councl I accept the low bid of $11,643.60 (B-Tu Mix Company). After discussion, Wingert moved, seconded by Woodburn, that Council adopt Resolution No. 76-42 awarding the bid to B-Tu Mix Company In the amount of $11,643.60, for Hamllne Avenue Improvement, County Road F to Highway 96. Matton carried unanimously. Bids for County Road F Improvement Christoffersen referred Council to the bids received tor the County Road F Improvement, ranging from $155,173.30 to $199,844.00. He reported that plans have been sent to the State for review, but have not been returned to date; bid should not be awarded at this time, pending approval by the State, and resolution of necessary easements by Attorney Lynden. In. dlscusslon o~ needed easements, Mr. R~lling stated he has not made any definite decisions on the easements requested. . Feasibility Report re little Crow Addition - Christoffersen referred Councl I to his lotter of 8/18/76 In which he estimates the cost of the proposed Little Crow Addition at $18,500, reducing this amount by $1,000, If bituminous curb is substituted for concrete curb and gutter. After discussion, Council requested McNlesh to inform the property owners of the feasibility report and to a.k whether they wish Council to proceed with preparation of plans and specifications tor the project. A!lprOVa I of Rams.llY County P I ens for Lex i ngton Avenue i ~.2!ovement from County Road E to Grey Fox Road Council was referred to letter from Floyd Snyker, Assistant County Engineer (8/19/76), in which he estimllted the total cost for storlll sewor @ $27,330 involved alinneios to be Shorevlf;lll" Arrll!'n Hills, Ramsey coun.tY-!!'\rl Mli:s,~ta Highway Oepartment. It \tilS noted by McNiesh that f1tf~~portion of the cost, when determined, will be credited-iIiii against future'(pr-oJects Involving County particI- pation. ,~~ -2- }iinU"i-(3s of Special Counci I ~!€letjng Page three August 23, 1976 . After discussion, Woodburn moved, seconded by Crichton, that Council approve the Ramsey County plans for Lexington Avenue ~mprovement from County Road "E" to Grey Fox Road S.A.P. 62-651-05, and authorize execution thereof by Mayor Crepeau. Motion carried unanimously. Application for Payment No.3 and Final - C. W. Houle Landscaping Co., Inc. for Indian Oaks Two Addition Chrlstofforsen referred Councl I to his letter of 8/12/76 and Applica- tion for Payment No.3 and Final from C. W. Houle Landscaping Co., Inc., in the amount of $5,125.61, for indian Oaks Two Improvement; noted that there Is no retainage. Christoffersen advised that there is a one-year guarantee of the project from the date of final acceptance. Crichton moved, seconded by Woodburn, that Council accept the project and approve andauthoriza 3rd and flna' payment to C. W. Houle Co., inc. In the amount of $5,125.61, for Ondlan Oaks Two Addition. Motion carried unanimously. Warning Devices to Individual Homes Christoffersen reported that he does not recommend placing individual home warning devices In either the pumping stations or manholes; City wo~ld still have responsibility; would not want unauthorIzed persons to enter either the manholes or the stations. Wingert agreed to pursue a device which can be placed In Individual homes; warns occupant when it contacts water ($10 -$12 probable cost). REPORT OF ViLLAGE ATTORNEY JAMES LYNDEN (absent) Case No. 74-38, Twin City Christian Homes - Request for Time Extension for Special Use Permit. Reverend Larry Petersen requested CouncIl to extend the Special Use Permit for the Twin City Christian Homes retirement center which was granted about a year ago; reported they are seeking federal funds and antlcipate3 acknowledgement of their applIcation In about a week. Larry McGough advised Council that T.C.C.H. has proceeded to purchase the property and would like some assurance that prQJ~et ~ill be approved when funds are available. A. ...I! . III th - J I ~. 11 I r II 4 r I -II' -', r -""-rr- , I. - . , - - . L' I ...... . .., . ~ -.. ". . ., , . i-- I . ,. '. -.. I " r .. '" "'_ I -. .^'~. . I ,.... , 1.- ___I ."JI."" _..J II t,u .. I . . . -, _ I I . -T--TH -:. "" Special Use Permits automatically expire and become and after date on which grantedJexpiratlon date of be extended for an additlGna! period, not to exceed , , c I . ." vo I d 6 months "H'om such permit may 6 monThs-. Crichton noted that park dedication needs may have changed In the intsr;m period; parks department wi I! probably want to revielt its.., requirements in this are'3 of the Village at time Amended Special Use Permit "Is c<m- sldered. ." After discussion, Reverend Petersen ~ithdrew his request for time ex- tension. Case No. 76-3, Northwestern College - Special Use Permit Attorney Leander Lippert and Thomas Erickson requested that Council defer Its deliberations re Northwestern College's application for Special Use Permit, to the meeting of September 13, 1976. Counci I granted the request. REPORT OF VILLAGE CLERK ADMiN~STRAIOR CHARLOTTE MCNiESH Lake JohsAna Fire Departme~Agreement re Purchase of Dispatching Equipment Deferred to later Council Meeting. -3- , Minutes of Spec I a I Counc I i Meet i 119 Page {-our August 23, 1976 Special Council Meeting Woodburn moved, seconded by Wingert, that Council schedule a Special Council Meeting at 7:30 p.m. on Thursday, August 26, 1976, at the Shorevlew Village Hall. Motion carried unanimously. Insurance Consultant McNiesh referred Councl I to her memo of 8/11/76 ro Insurance Consultant. . After discussion, McNlesh was requested to Inquire If Wm. Peet Co. will recommend on self-insurable items, present alternBtiv9s, be responsive to to direction from the Counci I, suggest raising and lowering of deduc- tlbles, offer suggestions to reduce premiums? It was the consensus of the Councl I that McNlesh request Wm. Peet Co. to prepare the specifications and invitation to bid, as described In her memo of 8/11/76. Payrolls Crichton moved, seconded by Woodburn, that Council approve the Payrolls as submitted except that check 14459 be cancelled and re-Issued In the gross amount of $62.50, representIng I month. Motion carried unanimouSly. Resolution Nos. 76-43 and 76-44 Wingert moved, $econded by Woodburn, that Council adopt Resolution No. 76-43, RESOLUTiON RELATING TO APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENTS RELATiNG TO SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO.4, and Resolution No. 76-44, APPOR- TIONMENT OF ASSESSMENTS RELATING TO CONSOLIDATED WATER IMPROVEMENTS NOS. 68-2 AND 68-3. Motion carried unanimously. Cancellation of August 30th Council Meeting Wingert moved, seconded by Crichton, that the Council Meeting of August 30, 1976, be cancelled. Motion carried unanimously. Case No. 76-31, Special Use Permit - Donald Palme Wingert moved, seconded by Crichton, that Counci I schedule a Public Hearing on September 7, 1976, before the Planning Commission regarding an application for Special Use Permit by Donald Palme, for two duplexes on County Road E, west of Hamllne Avenue. Motion carried unanimOUSly. September Council Meetings Crichton moved, seconded by Wingert, that September Council Meetings be scheduled at 7:30 p.m. at the Village Hall, as follows: Regular Council Meeting - Monday, September 13, 1976. SpeCial Councll/Finance Committee Meeti~ - Thursday, Septem- ber 23, 1976. Regular Council Meeting - Monday, Septembe~ 27, 1976. Adjournment Crichton moved, seconded by Wingert, that the meeting adjourn at 11:00 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. . &.th~~ Charlotte MeN ash Clerk Administrator au, Jr. NOTICE OF MEETING The next Regular Council Meeting will be held on Monday, September 13, 1976, at 7:30 p.m. at the Village Hall. -4- . . . P.eAJ.-l,.J<; ,(4 7(,-5'1 t/ 7'-J# Extract of Minutes of Meeting of city Council. City of Arden Hills Ramsey County, Minnesota Held Auqust23~ 1976 pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting of the City council of the City of Arden Bills, Minnesota, was duly held in the City all in said City on Monday, the 23rd day of August, 1976, at 7:30 o'clock p.m. The following members were present:: Mayor crepeau and C<>U2lCilmen Wingert, Crichton and WoodbuJ:1H and the followinq were absent: councilman Feyereisen resigned on August 9, 19'16 and no replacement has been named. Also in attendance were: Charlotte McNiesh, city Clerk Administrator, Don Christoffersen of Banister, Short, Elliott, Hendrickson & Associates, city consulting engin_rsf and Peter s. Popovich of peterson, popovich, I<nutson & Flynn, city bond consultants. The City Clerk Administrator presented an affidavit showing publication of notice of hearing on the proposed assessment for Indian Oaks 2 Addition Xmpt'ovement in the New Brighton Bulletin on August 5, 1976, which affidavit was examined, found satis- factory, and ordered placed on file. The Clerk Administrator a.lso exhibited a Csrtificate of Mail.ing Notice of Bearing to all affected property owners. MAYOR CIU!:PEAU: I sUppose we should say this public hearing opened at 7:44 p.m., August 23, 1976. Mr. Don Chris- toffersen, city engineer, would you please explain the project and the assessments. . MR. CHIRSTOFFERSEN: The project consists of the construc- tion of sanitary sewer, watermain ODd street facilities. Indian Oaks 2 Addition is north of Indian Oaks Addition on this location on the map. Construction consists of watexmain along James Avenue and along Indian Oaks couxt, sanitary sewer on Indian oaks Couxt, and street construction for James Avenue and Indian Oaks Court. The total cost of the project to be assessed was 100%. We Qriginally estimated this assessment to be $56,502.81. The original assessment was based on estimated construction costs.. Since then we have rece!ved the final payment so we could reduce the assessments. originally, Mr. Feyereisen requested that they be assessed on a benefitteQ basis - take the total number and divide by the total number of lots. However, there were four lots that he wanteQ assessed differently. He said to place a maximum of $4,100 on the l~s shown with the orange dots and the lots shown with the green dots he requested be assessed $4,900.70. The reason for this was to get a balance. In other words, we took the lots he wanted to assess the $4,100 and subtracteQ from the total and divided the remaining lots which (inaudible) was left over. We are not placing an assessment on Lot NO.5. That's where the pond is. The adjustment of $333.00 distributed against three different lots as directed by Mr. Feyereisen would be $111 less on Lot 7, Block 1 and Lots 2 and 3 of Block 2 so their assessment would be less than $4,100.00. The three lots of $4,900.JO were not sold at the time the assessment was placed and the people puxchased those lots knowing that the asssssment would be that amount on t.lotose lots. 'l'hat concludes my portion. I will be happy to answer allY questions. MAYOR CREPEAU: Any questions? COUNCILMAN CRICmONI You said the lots at $4,900 were not sold at the time you set that figure? MR. CHRISTOFFERSEN: That's correct. At the time we were working on it those lots were not sold and since they have been sold - myunderetanding is they were sold knOWing that was what the assessment would be. COUNCILNAIl' CRICB'l'ON: How many lots were there? MR. CHRISTOFFERSEN: Fourteen lots. MAYOR CREPEAU: Any other questions? If not, Mr. peter popovich, would you please explain the fiscal matters. MR. POPOVICH: Mayor and members of the council. I met. with the engineer and Mr. Feyereisen when the assessment details were being worked out and as was indicated to you, the original cost was $56.502.81 and the $333 which bas now been firmed up can be deducted. There's a total of 13 lots - nine at $4,100 . . . .. and four at $4,900.70. Mr. Feyereiaen haa made certain arr&.nge- menta with people who have purchased those lots and he will pay the amount that waa agreed upon when he sold the particular lots. For purposes of the assessment hearing and the assess- ment roll, Obviously the Council had to propose the adoption of a period of time, and in the notice the assessments are spread over 20 years with an 8% carrying charge. The notice also provided that there could be the opportunity of paying 50% of such assessment within that 30 day period before it's ce:.::tified on down. our discussions in our office - and at that tiro~ Mr. Feyereisen wasn I t completely sure how much he was going to pay down and'it would, Obviously on some lots, might nct be the full 50% - it might be something less than that. Yeu have the right to make that determination tonight if you wish to, and perhaps the engineer can tell you what Mr. Feyereisen may have discussed with him subsequent to that meeting in our office, but assuming there is no other change than that, there would be 30 days to pay without any interest penalty, after which the assessment roll would be certified to . the county and then one-twentieth of the principal would be collected each year for the next 20 years, together with an 8% carrying charge. Anyone who may own a lot may pay the assessment balance up anytime within that 20 year period, but :r know Mr. Feyereisen has this arrangement with some of the lot owners and he indicated he would make whatever paymenta are necessary during that 30 day period so that his commitment was kept. MAYOR CREPEAUs Any questions? COUNCILMAN CRICHTONs I g1\ther we have, except for the lots where no assessment is m~de, three different assessment figures? MR. POPOVICH: There is one \.'lithout any assessment so th",,:ce would be no assessment there. There are nine lots originally scheduled at $4,100.00 and four at $4,900.70. Now, '~,e $333 comes off of which lots? MR. CHRISTOFFERSEN: Lot 7, Block 1 and Lots 2 and 3 of Block 2. COUNCILMAN CRICHTON: In addition to the zero, there are fe'1%' different prices. I guess my only real concern is, since t~ese are different figures, do all of the land owners know they are being charged more or less than the others? Do they knml this? It's a little unusual practice if they don't. MR. POPOVICH: Theoretically, the assessments would be to the benefits and you would think they would be equal, but because of the prior arrangements Mr. Feyereisen had where they would pay assessments up t~ ~ certain amount and he would pay any amount over. th~t., ~~~~'s wherotho different figures come :.:.11.... COUNCILMAN CRICHTON: an agreement that each of pay $4900 or $41001 MR. POPOVICH: The high cost ones are still owned by Mr. Feyereisen. The lower cost ones are those he has sold out or by contract for deed. Do we have assurance there is such the land owners knows he's going to . MR. CHRISTOFFERSEN: One thing - I'm not sure Mr. popovich is aware of - and just recently, the day before he left, he said that he had sold those with the understanding that the assessment would be $4,900. MR. POPOVICH: but at the time the owner of those lots If he did that recently that's all right, assessment roll was prepared he was the that were higher priced. MAYOR CREPEAU: You said in your statement that Mr. Feyereisen may want to pay something less than 50}(, of the assess- ment in the first 30 day period. MR. POPOVICH: In your legal notice, we have always had a policy in the city to get as much money in advance as you could and so we have always provided they could pay up to 50}(, of the assessment so if they had a $4100 assessment they could pay half of it e.nd it would be better. for us. At the time the details were being worked out I indicated to Mr. Feyereisen if he had any commitment where he could pay any money now we would like to get the money in to the Treasurer at this time and that was the one thing that was left open in my office and he hasn't discussed it any further with you, Don? MR. CHRISTOFFERSEN: No. MR. POPOVICH: The question was whether he might want to pay something less than 50}(,. No, it's at least 50}(,. So if he wanted to pay up to 50% something would have to be done with the ordinance but he has not come back to me and apparently not to Mr. Christoffersen so the ordinance would stand and the Notice as we originally published it would stand that it's at least 50}(,. MAYOR CREPEAU: Any of the property owners here? If there are, we'd like to hear from you. We don't hear from any property owners, none being present. Do we have a resolution? MR. POPOVICH: We have not prepared them because we would have to draft them to fit the situation, but the first reso- . . . , ' lution would be to nm~nd the assessment roll as recommended by ~~e engineer because tile $333 has to be applied to certain lots. After you have adopted that resolut.ion, the second resolution would be to adopt the assessment roll as amended, and then the rest of the boiler plate language would follow. We will prepare that and send it to l4rs. MCNiesh. Councilman crichton then introduced the following resolu- tion and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 76-39 RESOLUTION AMENDING ASSESSMENTS FOR INDIAN OAKS 2 ADDITION IMPROVEMENT BE IT RESOLVED by the city Council of the City of Arden Hills, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The proposed assessments for Indian oaks 2 Addition Improvement should be and are hereby amended as follows: Description of Property Indian Oaks Two Lot 7 Block 1 25 36010 070 01 Chanqe Made original Revised $4,100.00 $3,989.00 Indian Oaks Two Lot 2, Block 2 25 36010 020 02 4,100.00 3,989.00 Indian oaks Two Lot 3, Block 2 25 36010 030 02 4,100.00 3,989.00 2. It is hereby found and determined by this Council that the foregoing amendment is just and equitable to said pro- posed assessment, and necessary to a fair assessment for payment of the cost of said improvement. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resoluticn. w&s duly seconded by Councilman wingert and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Al11 and the following voted against the same: None7 whereupon said ~~tion was declared duly passed and adopted. ~ . ' Councilman Woodl:lUn"l then. introduced the following rel'lolu- tion and moved its adoption: RESCLUTION NO.. 76-40 RESOLUl'ION ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS AS AMENDED FOR INDIAN OAKS 2 ADDITION IMPROVEMENT BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the city of Arden . Hills, Minnesota. as follows: 1. The amount proper and necessary to be specially assessed at this time for Indian Oaks 2 Addition Improvement, against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land affected thereby has been duly calculated upon the basis of benefits, without regard to cash valuation, in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota statutes. Chapter 429, as amended. and notice has been duly mailed and published, as required by law, that this CoUncil would meet to hear. consider and pass upon all objec- tions, if any, l'.11d said proposed assessment has at all times since its filing been C'pen fc~ )?w:>lic inspection. and an oppor- tunity has been given to all interssted persons to present their obj ections, if any, to sucll proposed assessments. 2. This Council, lltlvinq heard and considered all objec- tions so presented. end being fully advised in the premises, finds that each of the lots, pieces and parcels of land en\Dller- ated in the proposed Qssessma."l.t l':S amended was and is specially benefitted by the C01lSt.ruction of said i"llproveroent in not less than the amount of the assesament set opposite the description of each such lot, piece and parcel of land, respectively, and such emount so set out is he~eby levied against each of the respective lots, pieces and parcels of land therein. 3. The proposed a'''~ess'''ents as aJPended are hereby adopted and confir.med as the proper special assessments for each of said lots, pieces and parcels of .Land respectively, and the assess- ment against each parcel. together with interest at the rate of 8% per ann\Dll accruing on the full amount thereof from time to time unpaid, shall be a lien concurrent with general taxes upon such parcel and all thereof. The total amount of each such assessment shall be payable in equal annual principal install."IIElnts extending over a period of twenty (20) years, the first of said installments, together with interest on the entire assessment from the date hereof to December 31, 1977, to be payable with general taxes for the year 1976. collectible in 1977 ~ and one of each of the remaining installments. together '.nth one year's interest on that and all other unpaid install- ments, to be payable with general taxes for each consecutive year thereafter until the entire assessment is paid. . . . " 4. prior to certif:Lc~'l:ion of the assessment to the county Auditor, the owner of a~y lot, piece or parcel of land assessed hereby may at any time pay the 1I<1hoJ.e, or at least 50}(" of sU.ch 8Bsessment, with interest to the date of pElyment, to the City Treasurer, but no interest shall be charged if such payment is mede within 30 days after the da.te of this resolution. 5. The city Clerk Administrator shall. as soon as may be. prepare and transmit to the County Auditor a certified duplicate of the assessment roll, with each installment and interest on e<:.ch unpaid assessment set forth separately, to be extended upon the proper t.a:x lists of the county, and the County Auditor shall thereafter collect said assessments in the manner pro- vided by law. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilman crichton and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Alli and the following voted against the same: None: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. ~ ~~~ ~~~ , . . .. . STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) 5S COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) I, the undersigned. being the duly qualified and acting Clerk Administrator of the City of Arden Hills. Ramsey County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of the Council of said city held on the 23rd day of August, 1976, with the original thereof on file in my office, and the same is a full, true and complete transcript therefrom insofar as the same relates to Indian Oaks 2 Addition Improvement. of WITNESS MY HAND and the seal of said City this , 1976. day City Clerk Administrator (SEAL)