Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 03-23-1981 . .111 Minutes of Special Council Meeting Village of Arden Hills Monday, March 23, 1981 - 7:30 p.m. Village Hall Call to Order Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Crichton called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. . Roll Call Present - Mayor Charlie Crichton, Councilmen Janet Hollenhorst, Robert Woodburn, Diane McAllister, Maurice Johnson Absent - None Also Present - Attorney James Lynden, Engineer Donald Christoffersen, Treasurer Donald Lamb, Planner Orlyn Miller, Farks Director John Buckley, Clerk Administrator Charlotte McNiesh, Deputy Clerk Dorothy Zehm. Approval of Minutes Johnson moved, seconded by Hollenhorst, that the Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of March 9, 1981 be approved as amended. Motion carried unanimously. Correction to Minutes of February 23rd Council MeetinR McAllister moved, seconded by Ho1lenhorst, that the Minutes of the Council Meeting of February 23, 1981 J;>e corrected as follows: (page 3, paragraph 4, roadway widths) "32 ft. wide - no parking either side 36 ft. wide - one side parking only 46 ft. wide - both side parking Council concurred that a 36 ft. wide street, with parking on one side is considered adequate." Motion carried unanimously. Business from the Floor None REPORT OF PARK DIRECTOR JOHN BUCKLEY 1981 Diseased Tree Removal Contract Council waS referred to Buckley's memo of 3-19-81, and attachments thereto. After discussion, Woodburn moved, seconded by Ho1lenhorst, that Council award the bid for 1981 Diseased Tree Removal to Blueme1- Timm, the apparent low bidder. Motion carried unanimously. REPORT OF VILLAGE ATTORNEY JAMES LYNDEN . Park Ordinance No. 214 Council was referred to draft of Ordinance No. 214, as amended. Lynden asked Council if the intent is to regulate only city-owned parks and pathways, or if the intent of the ordinance is to cover all parks and open space. In discussion, Lynden suggested that if it is Council's intent to cover all parks, "open space site" should be reworded to refer to any public park, pathway, trail, and parking areas appurtenant thereto, or any similar public open space. Lynden suggeated if Council has specific concerns about enforcement problems in county park areas, it may request by resolution that the county ordinance be changed to enable enforcement of the specific public park within the city. After discussion, Lynden was requested to modify the wording of Ordinance 214 to apply to county parks as well as city parks. Minutes of Special Council Meeting Ma r ch 23, 198'1- . It was Council's understanding that the Ordinance draft, after re- draft by Attorney Lynden,shall be referred to the Parks Committee for its recommendations to Council. Lexington/694 Storm Draina~e Project - Status Report on Cost Sharing Joint Powers Agreement Lynden reported receipt of a number of proposed changes by Shoreview's attorney; reported that he will continue negotiations pending with the City Engineer and Shoreview's Engineer and Attor- ney; .said he anticipates they will be resolved by the March 30th meeting. Trinity Church Parkin~ A~reement - Status Report Reported that this agreement has not been prepared to date. McAllister asked that it be completed by the end of March if possible, for Council's consideration. . County Road E Easements McNiesh reported that one easement has been received; anticipates receipt of all signed agreements by March 31st. REPORT OF VILLAGE ENGINEER DONALD CHRISTOFFERSEN New Brighton Interceptor - Status Report Council was referred to letter of 2-19-81 to New Brighton Public Works Director from Metropolitan Waste Control Commissioner re inter community sewage flow between the cities of Arden Hills and New Brighton. . Christoffersen explained that excess capacity may be available for Arden Hills' use of the New Brighton Interceptor; noted that no specific cost estimates have been computed as to whether this would be viable for Arden Hills. Christoffersen said he would like to compare the economic cost of the old plan with the New Brighton estimates. . Hollenhorst moved, seconded by McAllister, that Council authorize the City Engineer to proceed with the cost comparison for the alternate sewer line. Motion carried unanimously. REPORT OF VILLAGE TREASURER DONALD LAMB Investment $270,000 @ Northwestern Bank Saint Paul for 3 months, maturing June IS, 1981, at 14%. McAllister moved to rstify the Treasurer's investment. Motion was seconded by Johnson and carried., (4-0 Woodburn not present). REPORT OF VILLAGE PLANNER ORLYN MILLER Case No. 81-5, Lot Split and Consolidation and Special Uae Permit for Electronic Communication Tower Council was referred to Planning memo of 2-23-81, Engineer's Re- port of 3-27-81, Planning Commission Minutes of 3-4-81 and to plans for a proposed lot split and consolidation and Special Use . Permit for an electronic communication tower. Miller indicated the proposed 18.85 acre parcel at the south end of Round Lake on which a 700-foot high 2-way radio communication tower is proposed. Miller explained that in order to create a parcel large enough to accommodate the tower guying requirements, the applicant is proposing to split off the west 10 acres of the 17.6 acre Winiecki property and consolidate it with the 8.85 acre Truhler property. Miller explained that a 40' x 50' fenced area, including an approximate 20' x 20' control building is included in the appli- cation. -2- ~ - ~ Minutes of Special Council Meeting Msrch 23, 1981 Miller reported that some of the concerns expressed by residents and the Planning Commission were related to potential nuisance characteristics -interference for radio and TV -frequency compatibility with other towers -icicles falling -strobe lights nuisance to homes and drivers -possible dan~er to wildlife. .-radiation health problems -impact on proposed park . Miller noted that the Planning Commission motion to approve the proposal was subject to several conditions; vote on the motion was split (3 to 3). Miller reported that it is his understanding that the Parks Committee recommends denial because of impact on the pro- posed park in the area. Applicant Dan Vaughan explained that they do not want to be a pro- blem to Arden Hills; want to be an asset to the community. Vaughan referred Council to an actual survey taken of residents living in Plymouth near the 385' strobe lighted tower; noted that the candle power is reduced from 200,000 c.p. (day) to 4,000 c.p. (night); tower in Plymouth has one level of 4 strobes at the top. Colored slides of other towers were shown, as well as pictures of how the Arden Hills tower will look. It was explained that the tower proposed will be of galvanized metal (not a color); bottom strobe level will be at 230', middle level at 500', top level at 700'. Pictures of strobes with reflector plates, to reflect the light upward, were shown. . Crichton noted that tonight's meeting is not a Public Hearing but new information will be heard. Applicant Dan Vaughan provided pictures of the proposed tower area, taken from across 1-694 in the Valentine Crest area. In an effort to give an unbiased opinion and to satisfy questions. Vaughan said he contacted every communications engineer he knows of in the Twin Cities area to attend tonights meeting but none were available to- night. Vaughan said he did talk with Henry Bruns, an Arden Hills resident in this area, who works for Mn Dot, and asked him several questions pertaining to the tower proposal. He had no objection to the tower; he understands towers and said there certainly would not be any interference problems (radios and TV's are on entirely different frequencies. Vaughan said he also talked to Herman Hamre (Mn Dot) and he gave basically the same information. Plans, indicating where the lights will go on the tower were reviewed. . Crichton acknowledged receipt by the City of a number of notes, from people who are not here or were unable to be here, expressing their feelings. Crichton did not read them in detail, but sum- marized their content: In Favor Lee Roebke - Hwy. 10 Mrs. Eileen M.Boule, Valentine Crest Harold and Lucille Grudnoske, Hwy. 10 Mr. & Mrs. Dauffenbach, Old Hwy. 10 Rita & Allen Johnson, Lakeshore Place Jeanne Winiecki, Old Hwy. 10 In Opposition A Petition signed by 50 people (35-40 different families) names on the petition were read aloud. -3- Minutes of Special Council Meeting March 23, 19K1' Crichton referred to the motion of the Planning Commission which had a 3 to 3 vote, therefore no recommendation to the Council. Crichton reported that the Parks Committee recommended Council denial for the following reasons: 1. Proximity to park would be less desirable than a future modern industrial use. 2. Potentially inhibiting to persons using the park. 3. Potentially ~amaging the area designated for park usage. Hollenhorst asked about microwaves. Vaughan said he discussed this with Mr. Bruns, and tried to determine what microwave is. Mr. Bruns and Mr. Hamre (MnDot) indicated that up to 300 mega- hertz is considered very high frequency; ultra high frequency is . up to 1000 megahertz and microwave is over 1000 megah~rtz; there is no definition of what microwave is as opposed to megahertz. Vaughan said the Hwy. Patrol Tower uses 450 megahertz; most of the equipment on the proposed tower will be 450 megahertz; some will be 800 megahertz. As to interference, Vaughan said Mr. Hamre in- dicated that TV channels 4 and 5 use about 80 megahertz; therefore it would be impossible for the 450 or 800 megahertz to interfere with the 80 megahertz band; channel 11 uses about 200 megahertz: did not indicate what channels 2 and 9 use, but would be in this range: channel 17, which is UHF, uses between 500 and 600 maga- hertz in their transmission of sound. Vaughan said that other communications engineers, Ward Montgomery and Ron Vogamast (working in the Twin Cities) have indicated to him that there will be absolutely no preb1em with interference and no problem with microwave: the proposed tower will not accommodate microwave dishes": it is not being built to accommodate that load. It will only accommodate antennae to transmit 450 and 800 megahertz radiowaves, which is necessary in the communication of signals for business purposes: and will be used by the FBI and Secret Service. Vaughan said the wattage of the tower will be 75 to 100 watts. Equipment at the base of the tower is, for the most part, 75 watts~ there will be a number of transmitters in the 20' square building at the base of the tower, which will be hooked to an antenna at various stages up the tower. Woodburn asked the total radiated antennae power at anyone time. Question was referred to Electrical Engineer Bob Goetz. Goetz explained that in the area of VHF or UHF he would like to clarify that, for sure, there is not a microwave involved: the proposed tower is in VHF, UHF region. If start at the bottom of the tower with 75 or 100 watt bay stations there will bea line loss, depending on line used; the effective radiated power will consequently be lower than what is originated; the net result will probably not be more than 100 watts/transmitter on the tower: said he does not know how many transmitters there will be, but each will be on a different frequency so the number does not matter. Johnson asked the distance the Shoreview towers are from 1-694: expressed concern relative to ice problems. The Shoreview towers . were estimated to be in excess of 500 feet from 1-694, farther away than the proposed tower. The frequency of the strobe was stated to be 40/minute. In discussion of whether a park would be possible, if tower is approved, it was stated that it can be done; an active node on the west side of the site is preferable; if active area were not too large, it could be accommodated on the east side; it was noted that the west side of the site is not too accessible. Buckley indicated the proposed park location on the map. In discussion of the strobe lights, it was explained that they will be reflected upward and will not be a distraction for high- way traffic. Diagrams were shown of strobes, with and without the reflectors. -4- ..... . 'Minutes of Special Council Meeting March 23, 1981 The applicant, in answer to concerns that trees will be removed, said they do not intend to remove trees, we don't have to; will leave the site as natural as we can. It was noted that the house at the base of the tower, and the guy wires, will be fenced; area beneath the tower will be open for use if deaired. . Woodburn said he queries the appropriateness of a park in this area because of the relatively few people it would serve and its close proximity to the rendering plant. Buckley said the devel- ment of the acreage to the east would be the determining factor of whether a park would be warranted; it was anticipated origi- nally that this park would serve 800 people; therefore would need 8 acres; at present zoning would serve about 400-500 people; therefore would need a 4 or 5 acre park. Comments from the Floor Jeanne Winiecki reported that a medium density project was pro- posed in this area with a park; noted that the tower proposal preserves the wetland which is desirable. Jim Winiecki suggested that the city consider the NSP acreage, on the east side of Old Highway 10, as an alternate park area. Mr. Ghobrial, Valentine emitted from this tower possibility; it will be ference is coming from; damage from the tower. Crest,said he opposes the radiation and feels interference is a definite difficult to determine where the inter- will also be difficult to prove ice Leonard Grudnoske, Old Hwy. 10, spoke in. favor of the tower; feels it will not be a distraction; noted that Mr. Joe Bussard, owner of the acreage immediately east ~f the proposed tower property stands to lose the most. Joe Bussard, Old Hwy. 10, said he feels the tower development will be the best for everybody; does not object; feels it is a good use of the proper.ty. Don Krie~er, Valentine Crest, said it is not approved by Parks Committee; feels it's about time we say "no" to Motorola. Rav Keil. realtor for Winiecki property noted that he can't imagine a park in this location with a freeway to the south, rendering plant to the west; owner can't continue paying taxes and assessments to keep the area open; noted that the proposed tower site is approximately 1000 feet from Valentine Crest area; if ice should form, it would not reach Valentine Crest. Noted e. that the tower will not generat~ traffic or noise. Mr. Holste, County Road F, said he worked in TV for several years and knows of incidents where blocks of ice fell through a roof; a 700' tower could cause ice to fall 1400' away; said the freeway would certainly be in the range - feels a bond to protect the property owners and those on the freeway, should be required. . City En~ineer Christoffersen referred Council to his report of February 27th re a potential sewer line and road through the tower area; suggested that these mayor may not interfere with the tower development proposal. Vaughan said he has indicated acceptance of the conditions to the. Planning Commission motion. Mr. Holland, Valentine Crest Rd, said he has watched ice fall from the Highway Patrol tower. Pat Holland, Valentine Crest Rd, said the purpose of the petition is to show objection from the people in Valentine Crest area; asked if we need the tower; all who will see it are opposed. -5- Minutes of Special Council Meeting P < March 23, 1981 . After it was determined that there were no further comments, Woodburn moved, seconded by McAllister, that Council approve the lot split and consolidation and Special Use Permit, subject to: 1. The Owner will provide a sanitary sewer easement across the property if such easement is required in the future. 2. The Owner will not contest possible future sanitary sewer, storm drainage, or road assessments on the property. 3. All construction and maintenance access shall be from 14th Street N.E. (west side of property). 4 . A permanent access drive (single lane, gravel surface) be constructed from the present end of 14th St. N.E. to the tower/control building site. . 5. The Owner will provide certification of: a. FCC approval of facility. b. Satisfaction of FAA safety requirements for tower lighting. 6. The Owner will correct, at City's request, any documented interference problems to surrounding neighborhoods. 7. Agreement for sewer easement be in written form and state that the sewer easement ~ll not interfere with the tower construction. 8. Resolution of park dedication requirements ~rior to occupancy. In further discussion, Johnson said he is concerned about potential ice conditions; would like to get a better understanding from FAA; needs Some assurance for vehicles on 1-694. Miller said he pursued this ice matter with Shoreview; information received was that immediate properties, within distance of the tower height, experienced some roof problems; no problems were experienced on the freeway or beyond the tower height distance. Motion carried (Woodburn, McAllister, Hollenhorst voting in favor of the motion; Johnson and Crichton voting in opposition). (City Attorney Lynden to prepare agreement for sewer easement which may be needed.) Case No. 81-8, Variance - Retaining Wall, Arden View Drive - Arden Hills North Homes Association Council was referred to Planning Memo (3-11-81), Board of Appeals report (3-17-81), Public Safety Sub-Committee report (3-18-81) and to Planning Commission recommendation (Minutes of 3-19-81). Miller indicated the location of the proposed retaining wall on a . transparency of the Site Plan/Proposed Retaining Wall and Location Map. Miller reported that Public Works Supervisor Bud Johansen has no objection to the proposed wall re street maintenance. Miller reviewed the Board of Appeals and Public Safety concerns re 1ine-of-sight problems; stated that he is not convinced there is s sight problem as proposed. Miller reported that the Plan- ing Commission sees no problem with the wall as proposed; en- couraged exploring an alternate anchoring design Landscape Architect Larry Wacker explained that he designed the wall initially to resolve the erosion problem, and to protect existing trees, in a cost-efficient manner, and to not create a difficult maintenance problem. Wacker said the North Homes Association is flexible as to the length and height of the wall; 50 feet is proposed which follows the slope as it exists; 25' long is considered extreme; 35' would be considered a reasonable -6- - . .. Minutes of Special Council Meeting March 23, 1981 compromise. Wacker explained that the 4' height would be at tree grade; suggested 2' height is extreme, creating a difficult slope to maintain; 3' to 3~' would be a reasonable compromise. Wacker said the proposed "deadmen" anchor design is a simple construction method (4' long posts, driven into the hill); feels this can be done without jeopardizing the tree roots; feels the visual ob- struction is not significantly different from what now exists. After review of the findings of the Board of Appeals and Planning Commission by Miller, and Council discussion, McAllister moved, seconded by Woodburn, that Council approvethe16~' height vari- ance for the 1-694 sign, and deny the approximate 18' setback variance for the entrance sign on Red Fox Road. Case No. 80-19, Preliminary Plat Approval - McClung's Second Addition Miller briefly reviewed the proposal preliminary plat of the entire John McClung parcel, the first addition of which has been platted. Miller explained that the Second Additio~ was approved by the Plan- ing Commission on July 2, 1980.. subject to modifications, and Council on July 14, 1980 expressed concern relative to the number of lots under the required 95' width. Miller reported that the matter was deferred at that time, at the request of the develope~; the proposed amended Second Addition is presented tonight for Council's spproval. Miller reviewed the amended plat, noting the following lots on which variances exist: Substandard depth: Lot 8 125' Lot 10 - 115 ' (DO' required) (5' variance) (15' variance) Substandard width at Lot 1 92.56' Lot 7 85' Lot 8 88.72' Lot 9 85 ' building line (95' (2.4' variance) (10' variance) (6.3 variance) (10' variance) required) In discussion, Woodburn noted that if one less lot were proposed, all lot width variances would be eliminated. It was suggested that if the pathway width were reduced by 5', the depth varian~e could be eliminated on lot 8, as well as increase the lot area. . McClung advised that he has submitted a petition for city to put in the sewer, water and street; proposes a 2-phase feasibility re- port, would like to extend Colleen Drive now, and Chickanee curve improvement as an alternate. In discussion, Miller noted that, while it is not general practice to permit 85' wide cul-de-sac lots, some have been permitted; noted that the Planning Commission recommended eliminating lot width variances, except on the cul-de-sac lots. Miller noted that because of the terrain, the proposed cuI de sac is located where it should be; explained that the purpose of the 95' lot width requirement is to establish density and basic separation of build- ings, providing a quality building site; noted that these can be accomplished on the cul-de-sac lots, at the reduced building line lot widths. -7- Minutes of Special Council Meeting March 23, 19f1' - McAllister moved, seconded by Woodburn, that Council approve the Preliminary Plat of McClung's Second Addition as proposed. Motion did not pass (Woodburn voting in favor of the motion: McAllister, Johnson, Hollenhorst, Crichton voting in opposition). (Johnson and Hollenhorst said they wished to walk the property to better visualize the terrain and problems pertinent thereto.) Application Procedure for Proposed Windpowered Generator - John Lambros Council .was referred to recommendations of the Planning Commission (Minutes of 3-4-81 and 3-19-81). Miller explained that if the proposed generator is considered to . be a "private utility facility", which the applicant c.J.aims it to be, it would be exempt from the height requirements of the R-l Zoning dis trict; if considered an "accessory use other than normal", A Special Use Permit is required. Miller reported that the Planning Commission recommends that a Special Use Permit is the appropriate application. Lambros referred Council to recent legislation requiring NSP to buy excess power from private utilities; said he feels strongly about the dependency of the public on NSP; will develop about 10 KWH of electricity, selling surplus into the power grid. In discussion, it was suggested that the question is "Is the appli- cant a private utility now?" Lambros said he feels it is "the principle of the thing"; fears it might b.e defeated down the line; NSP is making electricity - Lambros is making electricity: it would not be different from NSP erecting power poles. After discussion, Woodburn moved, seconded by Hollenhorst, Council interpret the wind generator as an "accessory use" house and therefore a Special Use Permit will be required. carried unanimously. that to the Mo tion Case No. 80-44, Performance Bond for Temporary Srorage of Aggregate - Shafer Contracting Special Use Permit Miller referred Council to his memo of 3-23-81 recommending a per- formance bond in the amount of $16,000 for the temporary storage of aggregate on the Milton property. Woodburn moved, seconded by Johnson, that Council sccept a per- formance bond in the amount of $16,000, as recommended. Motion carried unanimously. OTHER BUSINESS Status Report, North Suburban Cable Commission - James Wingert Council was referred to Wingert's memo of 3-23-81 re Status Report- Cable Television Franchising Process. Wingert asked Council's decision on the underground versus aerial installation issue. Is installation of cable television cable permissable on poles which currently exist within the City of . Arden Hills and which are used now for electrical distribution and telephone cables? Wingert reported that the Underground Utilities Committee recom- mends the following: 1. In an area where existing utilities are underground, cable be installed underground;. 2. Where existing utilities are above ground, cable be permitted above ground; 3. Where overhead are installed underground, then cable should also be buried. 4. In undeveloped new areas, cable is to be buried as per code requirement. -8- .' . - Minutes of Special Council Meeting Ma r ch 23, 1981 5. Amendment of the City Code to include cable TV specifically as a utility. After discussion, Council concurred with the recommendations of the Underground Utilities Committee. Public Works Committee Recommendations re Seal Coating Project Council was referred to Johansen's memo of 3-20-81 re: 1981 Street Seal Coating, and to map indicating streets proposed to be included in the 1981 project. . . Woodburn moved, seconded by Ho11enhorst, that Council authorize preparation of the plans and specifications for the 1981 Seal Coat- ing program as recommended by the Public Works Committee. Motion carried unanimously. REPORT OF CLERK ADMINISTRATOR CHARLOTTE MC NIESH Apportionment of Assessments, Reiling!Northridge Emerald Inn - Resolutions No. 81-19 and 81-20 Woodburn moved, seconded by Johnson, that Council adopt Resolution No. 81-19. RESOLUTION RELATING TO APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENTS RELATING TO SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO.6, and Resolution No. 81-20, RESOLUTION RELATING TO APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENTS RE- LATING TO CONSOLIDATED WATER IMPROVEMENTS NUMBERED 67-1 AND 67-2. Motion carried unanimously. Request for Use of Village Hall for Meetings Council was referred to McNiesh's memo of 3-19-81 re request from Board of Directors of Town House Village& South to use the Council Chambers for their monthly meetings. After discussion. Council approved the request, on a trial basis, with the understanding that it may be rescinded if needed for Village meetings. Outlot B, Chatham Fourth Addition Council was referred to McNiesh's memo (3-19-81) re luncheon meet- ing with George Christenson, item 1. After discussion, Council concurred with McNiesh's evaluation of the possible assessment concerns and authorized her to relay this information to the school district as outlined in her memo. Retail Sales License Applications McNiesh submitted the following retail sales license applications to Council for approval: 1. Ronald L. Kadera Bike Repair - 1253 Connelly Ave. 2. Laudon Jewelry - 3553 Lexington Ave. 3. Christina Clinique - 3585 No. Lexington, Suite 380 In discussion, Crichton reviewed the status of pending ordinance violations at 1253 Connelly Avenue pertaining to screening of exterior storage and pending Special Use Permit application. . After discussion, McAllister moved. seconded by Ho11enhorst, that Council deny the issuance of a retail sales l~cen~~, L. Kadera at 1253 Connelly Ave. ~ ~ .u4. . ..-. - r. (Council requested Filla to proceed with enforcement of the"Code; if additional information is requested, ro advise Council.) Johnson moved, seconded by Woodburn. that Council approve the re- tail sales licenses for Laudon Jewelry, 3553 Lexington Ave., and Christina's Clinique, 3585 No. Lexington. Suite 380. Motion carried unanimously. -9- Minutes of Special Council Meeting - . March 23, 1981 . . Payroll McNiesh requested approval of check no. 13428, to Ashland Petroleum, in the amount of $10,118.12 (gasoline) and check no. 13429 to Lehman Transport (freight charge), in the amount of $120.63, in addition to approval of the Payroll. Hollenhorst moved, seconded by Johnson, that Council approve the Payroll and checks no. 13428 and 13429, as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. Giere. Addition - Park Dedication McNiesh reported that Mr. Giere accepted Council's suggested compromise of $1251.00 as satisfaction of park dedication require- ment for the 3-lot subdivision Giere Addition, as per Council . Minutes of 3-9-81. (It was noted that $1251.00 represents .98 acres @ $13,OOO/acre.) Proposed Resolution No. 81-21 McAllister moved, seconded by Johnson, that Council adopt Reso- lution No. 81-21, RESOLUTION EXTENDING CONGRATULATIONS TO THE 1981 MOUNDS VIEW HIGH SCHOOL BOYS' SWIMMING AND DIVING TEAM, as amended. Motion carried unanimously. Finance Committee MeetinK of 3-12-81 Hollenhorst reported that the Finance Committee recommends appoint- ment of one of its members as liaison to the. Public Works and to the Public Safety Committee. Crichton noted that it was not his intent that Finance Committee members be appointed as liaison to all committees; will discuss the matter with Council liaison McAllister. Shoreview Comprehensive Plan Woodburn reported that, in his review of the proposed Shore view Comprehensive Plsn, he found it to be compatible to the Arden Hills zoning and utility plans. Council referred the plan to Planner Hiller for his input; if Hiller concurs with Woodburn's findings, HcNiesh was requested to relay Arden Hills' comments to Shoreview. Adj ournment Hollenhorst moved, seconded by McAllister, that the meeting adjourn at 12:53 a.m. Motion carried unanimously. (}~k/;a:tit;#ff)d-Z~_ Charlotte McNiesh Clerk Administrator cD~ LiL. Charlie Crichton Mayor Notice of Meeting: . The next Regular Council Meeting will be held on Monday, March 30, 1981 at 7:~0 p.m. -10-