HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 08-11-1980
,
, ,
. ,
MINUTES OF REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
Village of Ardeo Hl11s
Mooday. August 11. 1980 - 7:30 p...
Village lIaU
Call to Orde r
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof. Mayor Crepeau cal~ed the
.eeting to order at 7:30 p...
Roll Call
Preseot - Mayor Henry J. Crepeau. Jr.. Council.ao Ward Hansoo. Ja.es
Wingert. Charlie Crichton. Robert Woodburn
Absent - None
Also Present - Engineer Donald Christoffersen. Treasurer Donald Lamb.
Planner Orlyn Miller. Clerk Administrator Charlotte KcNiesh.
Deputy Clerk Dorothy Zehm
.
.
..pproval of Minutes
Wiogert moved. seconded by Hanaon. that the Minutes of the Regular
Council Meeting of July 28th be approved as amended. Motion carried unani-
aously.
Busineas fro. the Floor
None
REPORT OF VILLAGE ENGINEIR DONALD CHRISTOFFERSEN
Reaolution .0. 80-~0. Declaring Adequacy of Petition and Ordering
FeaSibility Report for Iaprovement No. SS-W-80-2. Kenns Addition to
Arden Hilla
Crichton aoved. aeconded by Wingert. that Council adopt Reaolution
No. 80-~0. Motion carried unanimoualy.
Notice for En ineer to Proceed with Infiltration/Inflow
Chriatofferaen re erred Council to Donal Lund a letter 0 -4- 0
and to letter fro. MPCA giving Arden Hilla notice to proceed with
1/1 work for Phaae I and Phase II of the 1/1 ana1ysia.
Christoffereen explained that Phase II is the aathering of bact8round
material; noted that Pbase III ia field work and Phase IV is the report.
Christoffersen ssid the $5~.917 total cost is for all four phases of
the 1/1 analysis; noted that aonies expended before a certain date
(cost of installation of meters) are not eligible for collection under
the Grant Fund. but inforaation received therefrom is e1igibls.
Woodburn moved. seconded by Hanson. that Council give S.B.H. notice
to proceed with Phaees II and III. Motion carried unanimously.
Final Payments - C. W. Boule
Karth Lake Improvement No. 76-1 and Arden Late Knoll Improvement
No. 79-1
Christoffersen referred Council to Applications for Pinal Payment for
Karth Lake Improvement 76-1 ($6.~38.00) and Arden Lake Knoll I.prove-
ment 79-1 ($11.692.91); recommended that Council approve and accept
the projects and approve final paymenta.
Wingert moved. seconded by Crichton. that Council approve and accept
Karth Lake Improvement 76-1 project and authorize final payment in
. ~e amount of $6.~38 to C. W.Hou1e. Inc. Motion carried unanimously.
.' .ngert moved. aeconded by Haneon. that Council approve and accept
-Arden Lake Knoll Improvement 79-1 project and authorize final pay.ent
in the a.ount of $11.692.91 to C. W. Boule. Inc~ Motion carried
unanimously.
(It waa Council'. understanding that the Arden Lake Knoll performance
bond will be replaced by a one-year .aintenance bond.)
"EPORT OP VILLAGE PLANNER ORLYN KILLER
Caae No. 80-22. Lot Split and Consolidation. Steele and Floren _ 3510
North SnellinR snd 1~34 Arden Place
Council waa referred to Planner'a report of 7/29/80. tranaparencies of
attachmenta thereto. and to recommendation of tbe Planning Comm1ssion
(Minutes of 8/6/80).
-1-
Minutes of Regula': Gouncil ~eeti.ng
Page two
August II, 1980
Miller exp1aiuBd ~bat the propoaed lot splits and consolidations create
a residential lot that meets all dimensional and area requirements,
provides a conJorui,ng sideyard setback for the Steele property and
, places the sewer H.ne serving the Steele property on the same lot as
the Stee1ehol.!se.
Wingert moved, se"onded by Henson, that Council approve the lot splits
and consolidationu as requested. Motion carried unanimously.
Case No. 80-29, Vuriance for-1ennis Court - Rood, 3720 Chatham Court
Council wss 1oe:fer,:ed to Planner's report of 7-29-80', and to Board of
Appeals (8-6-80) and Planning Commlseicn(8-6-80) recommendations.
.
.
Miller explained that the variance is fer a 10' high fence at the ends
of the tennis court which encroaches on the 30' rear setback. Miller
displayed s transparency of the subject lot on the cul-de-sac, as it
relates to the adjoining lots, and to the proposed tennis court loca-
tion; noted thet the court will not impact views of neighbors. noted
that the encroachment is on City pr.operty, not on adjacent neighbors.
Miller noted that Ordinance 213 permits recreational facilities to
within two feet of property lines, if you can interpret a tennis court
as arecreatioual facility.
After diseus~ion, ~ingert moved, seconded by Hanson, that Council
approve tne rear setback variance for the 10' fence, coatiageDt upon
its being leudacaped to soften its appearance. Motion carried uDani-
mous ly .
(Couacil consider~d the tennis court as "recreational equipment" in
this instance; therefore permitted to within 2 feet of lot liae.)
Chatha. Pat~..,.!Y. Encroachment
It wa. reported that the Chatham pathway was encroached upon by the
developer. p&thvay wood chips vere removed.
Parka Director Buckley was requested to resolve this matter with the
deve lope r.
Caae No. aO-30, Preliminary Plat - Giere Addition
Council was referred to Preliminary Plat of Giere Addition, a proposed
four-lot iSub1iivision (3 lots accessing On James Avenue and a large lot
(lot 4.1 on Hamline Avsnue.
Miller reported that lot 4 can be aubdivided, in the future, into 2 or
3 lota; feels the plat, as propoaed, is a ~ea.onable aubdivieion of the
parcel; noted that utility stuos have been installed to aerve the
potential 3 lots on James Avenue.
Wingert lDoved, seconded by Woodburn, that Council approve the Pre-
liminary Plat of Giere Addition subject to resolution of park dedi-
cation. Motion carried unanimously.
.
,
Caee No. 80~261 Special Uee Permit for Diesel FuelStorsge Tanka -
Col_bie '1'ranIl1.t. 1901 West County Road!
Killer reported that the original application was for two 500-gallon
diesel fuel storage tenks to b~ located within the Columbia Transit
building, which Pire Chief ~och advised would violate the State Pire
Code.
Mr. Tom Bouthilet, Divi8io~ Manager of Columbi& Transit Corp., dis-
trlbutedcopiee of a revised spplication, requesting a Special Use
Permit fOIr !:he tempo,rary installation and use of one 500-gallon above
ground diesel storage tank on ~ atand located 150 feet from the north-
eaat corner of the present gsr~ge facility.
Bouthilet explained that they intend to experiment with 14 busea convert-
ed to diesel fuel; propose t~nk location on the edge of the current
perking aY-ee which would be aczeened from the residential area to the
,eeat by IIll!li3til1g traes and shrubs.
Miller reported that Mr. Kurlowski (Belair Builders) is opposed to
locating the tank on the eastern aide of the site; P1enning COlDmission
recommendll approval for oue year, with III one-yeer e~t:'!"l"iolll., Miller
-2-
Minutes of Regular Council Keating
P e.ge th ree
August II, 1980
noted there ia an iasue of non-conformancy here which was not dealt
with by the Planning Commission; noted that Council should determine
whether the storage tank i8 merely a matter of operation or an enlarge-
ment of the non-conforming use.
Wingert said it does not represent an expansion of the use; ssme
number of buses, only a chsnge in fuel; expressed concern that the
tank is also a re--fueling tank which will be the source of noise,
smoke, odor during refueling; said he feels it is unfortunate to
locate the tank adjacent to residential area when it could be located
on the west side, away from reaidential. It was noted that deteils
on dyking are needed from the City Engineer.
.
.
After discuasion, Wingert moved, seconded by Crepeau, that Council
approve iaauance of a Special Use Permit for one SOO-gallon above-
ground diesel fnel tank contingent upon:
1. Location of tank in northwest portion of the
site, and
.2. Approval by the City Engineer and peA of Buitable design
for dyking, and
3. Review at the end of one year to determine if it conatitutes
a significant problem andlor is objected to by neighbors.
In further discuss10~, Crichton said he concurs with placement of
the tank to the northwest, but does not agree that this is not an
en~argement of a non-couforming use; interprets ordinsnce intent is to
discourage operation of non-conforming uses, not contribute to or
assist in the continued non-conforming use of the site; consequently,
Conncil should not allow this tank.
Hanson asked the applicant if Columbia Transit can rely on commercial
stations to refuel the buaes, if the application is denied.
Bouthilet aaid be did not fsal the converaion would be feasible if fueled
in this manner; fuel savinga are needed, ao tank on the premiaea ia the
beat aolution to our atudy.
Woodburn asked where the tank would be located on the northwest por-
tion of the property.
Bouthilet said there are aoma treea in this location, a low marsh area
and 80me underbruah; noted that tank would be painted green.
Kotion carried (Wingert, Crepeau, Woodburn voting in favor of the motion;
Crichton, Hanaon voting in opposition).
Caee No. 80-24, Variance for Garage - Thomas Carroll, 3131 North
Lexington
Council waa referred to ~ianner's report of 7/30/80 and recommendations
from Board of Appeala (8-6-80) and Planning Commission (8-6-80).
In review, Miller noted that the County will remove the existing small
house on the northwest corner of Lexington snd County Road D and re-
grade the lot as indicated on the County Engineer's plan; plan also
indicates that a retaining wall will be constructed along a portion of
the Lexington Avenue r.o.w. line.
.
Killer referred to the Applicant's proposal (Exhibit 1) which i8 to
construct a new garage with access to County Road D; noted that a
driveway to County Road D provides a safer approach hut is concerned
that garags, as proposed to be located, may constitute B visual encroach-
ment 8 feet from the r.o.v. line, reported that the County Engineer does
not apparently have thia concern. Killer noted that tbe garage vill
be obvious, at leaat, from the roadway.
Killer reported that it is nut certain whather the County will aell the
lot or grant an eaaement to e~e Carrolla for the drivevay; if lot is
Dot in their ownership, the "lternate proposal (Exhibit 2) ia not
poaaible; noted that the alt~rnate proposal increaaea the garage aetback
from Lexingtoo to about 20 faet, but does not provide the shelter from
aouDd of Lexington Avenue traffic that applicancs desire and expect to
achieve with their proposal.
-3-
:M,inu.tes of R{;j1U ,'1: ',::ourL:::Ll t:-e~l:.nE
P ij,ge four
Al.igU3l: 11, 1980
~il1er reported thac tba ?lSDuiug Comm19sion recnmmends acceptance of
the concept 02 r,o'fi.ng I:lle (ir:l.veMay to Cocnty Roed D, but desired Qore
information froln:he County Engineer befcre making a recommendation
relative to the p~aposed Dew garage.
.
.
Woodburn noted that some r.o.w. was purchased by the County some years
ago, when improvement of Lexington was contemplated, which reduced the
applicant's front yard. Mrs. Carroll said the County prefers to give
an easemen.t mrer the County lot for a driveway to County Road D,rath!l.r~#
than sell: reported that Engineer We1tzin is not concerned about the~-
line with propq""i t;d:age location because of the chanle in the road
alignment; reported that, accordinl to Weltzin, garage as proposed will
be 5 feet higher than finished County Road D, which is a 10% grade and
perfectly acceptable. Mra. Carroll said they plan to replace the hedle
which was removed during the cODstruetlon proeess; hedre ~111 hel~
screen the garage.
Mrs. Carroll said tbe curb, will be ~ along Lexiulton in 5 to 10 days:
County will eliminete cut for their existing driveway, whicb will be
very steep, if approval is granted to relocate larage with access to
County Road D: said they would concur with depressing garage floor,
as recom.ended, if required.
Hrs. Bamberry, County Road D, said the new garage as proposed would
cause a ssfety bazard for residents on County Road D and Shoreline Lane,
enterinl Lexinlton.
Hr.. Carroll Baid there will be 16' between the garage and the curb:
Pl.nniul Co..i.sion feels driveway would be better on D than on Lexinl-
ton - only concern was grade informatioo from County Engineer; County
EDlineer feels our proposal is "supern.
Dorothy Rardy, Shoreline Lane, said the larage will cause a eafety
hazard for accees to Lexinlton fro. D; people would object to this
setback variance for ae if I wented to axtend my garage to the front.
Resident liviol on Shoreline Lane said now we'll have a garage to
block our viev; this already danlerous corner will continue to be e
dangerous corner; .eny tiae. we cannot make a left tnrn ooto Lexinlton.
Hrs. Cerroll said they have difficulty backillg out onto Lexington.
Miller ackoowledled that the turniol radius ,,__ current d veway - aod
turn-around area is difficult: with car parked in turn area, it would
be neces.ary to back onto Lexington.
Woodburn noted that the hi~l is the problem oow: .~ linea after
gradinl are unknown: suggested garage location be staked so Council
can aee if garage will encroach on site linee.
Crichton concurred that if Council can enable an access to County Road D,
without impacting tbe situation for residents on Couoty Road D and
Shoreline Lane, Council sbould really take a look. Wingert noted that
tbe Lexington Avenue project bas created a hardship for the Carroll
property which should be alleviated, if possible.
.
Bob Weaalund, Shoreline Lane. said the real interest is "aafety"; not
rilbt to take care of one and not others involved: we'll be in tbe same
position aa before if this garage is permitted.
Woodburn noted that there ia an alternate road access to Lexington
fro. Couoty Road D through the park. Mrs. Hardy said tbe County wcn't
.aintain tbat road; feels it would be better to not have this traffic
on our atreet.
Resident living on Shoreline Lane, asked vl!at\.,the Test of the people
will do along Lexington Avenue for driveway" aCl:ess.' It was noted that
.1;,4:1,s Pc",r~i~,uI8r property baa a peculiar si tuat:l.on as - the resul t (If
'i..l~ID..Dt of the road.
Mrs. Ca rroll ag. reed to.have proposed ga;r!J'!..t 1..OC8 1:1.on
can sea vbe-tber "IlQrage will encJ:oaFh on ~lines,
action to Special Council Meatinl of August 18th.
staked 80 Council
Council defer.red
-4-
Yinutes of Regul.ar Gouncil ~ic(,tiug
r ~.g,;;: five
August 11. 1981)
Case No. 80-?J~.t-.!.~;.iauc!,__~~_j"Ya"e - AU.!.!:..!!. PhiH.pson. 1548 West Arden
Place
Council vas r,'~f.srtl!d to Pl.tu.ner's repoorE of 7-~9-80 aod to Board of
Appeals (8-6-80) and 'lannirg Commissiun (8-6-80) recommendations.
Miller noted tnat all homes along this street encroach upon the front
setbacks as they ar~ conetrLcted; actulll request of applicant is a
setback of 19' - :W' (a 20' to 21' v'Hi.an.ce). Hiller reported that
the Planning Comlll:lssion Iec:cnllllenda thaI: .' ",,":"lance be granted up to
the average existi~g setback of the tva properties to the east of the
Philipson property whicb would crea~ 3etback uniformity.
.
.
Wingert moved, secunded by llnnllon, that: Council al'prove a front setback
variance of 20 feu\:.
In further diacu8niou, it wa~ noted this woald permit a 22' x 24' garage.
Crichton queried ~he reason for grantiDg the variance. Crepeau ex-
plained that ehe lot drops sharply to . lagoon in tbe rear; no choice
but to locate boues aa it is; hardship is tbe Gteep drop of lot in the
rear.
Crichton said he doe a not ee~ that uniformity ie a reason for approval
ot a variance.
Hotion carried (W;Lnsert, Henson" WoodlHr.!:.... Crel'aau voting :10 tavore of
the motion; CrlchCon voting In opposition).
Case No. 80-32~1.:1ancU~ Sign - L.ittle Cbrfcetians Nureery Scho~.!,.
J245 N.~__Brighto~oad
Hiller referred Council to sketch of proposed 4' x J' sign which would
identify tbe nUKs~ry Bcbool within Trlaity Lutheran Church; noted that
olgn ia sbowa at 21 feet fro~ New Brighton Road (25'seCbeck required).
Council waa ref cEred to r~comma~datiDus of BaBrd of Appeals (8-6-80)
ll!3.d Planning Commi,s ~:i.on (8-6-80).
After diB~uaslon. Cricbton 1110'1.., .ecaudad by Wiagert, that Council
authorize the canstructioa aad locatiDu af the aign as modified by
the Planning COVil\1isfJion;;
1. Sign tu b. fra..a aad done in Bubdued colors, as epproved by
tbe City 'lanner,
Z. Sign 18 setback 25' feom property lins.
3. Size of BIln be .11D~~d to lncrea~. by 10" tD accDmmodate frame.
4. J:onstructicn of slg~ to be of mor~ durable con8t~'!ctiou
'th aD :~roi'o[Je d.
for a per:lod (,1'
r,~lative .to th<a
.tllis loci1itiou.
o~e yeas:: in order to det~rmin8 noighborhood in-put
sign and to jeterrnine whether eign is appropriate 1~
Motion carri!d UDQDirucusl1~
.
Case No.. ~,O-8 r:. l,sljdu ca:v:[:: '?la..:l{iEprovf;,:l, en,'j, f;o~~~\_""l!<.;~~1:i.,~~,n::, Ave;~ue
Warehouse ;:-RQb~, IJ~7Lu,,(- (i[If ~C'o.E_~t l:ur...::.fouO['---..----- .
Miller reported receipt of a elightly revised la8dB,ape plan wbich
pEDvides additionsl plan'i"I' along the long pErking eres, a. suggesced;
bond is elJt1mst~d. @ $16,.690.)0. (COB\: or pl..mtiz,;<:a and s<ld/f'Jeed :i.a
eBtimated @ $13.352 x 1251 - $16,6S0.00)
Woodburn llove~ thet Couucil ~P?rove the lsndscL96 plan
the additional p1snting8 Eaq~.nt.d b, Plaaner Rill.~.
by Wingert and cerried au.al~Dqel,.
aud bond., ",ith
MD~lou was seconded
OUller nated that if e l"'H!;lcnp'" .8ti~Ult~ ie I'H,,:d.vElcl. bOlld I.lIilOUflt
can be adjusted ~ccDrdi~ll,.1
'l'op08ed HIgn Or,~"!!;:!:~>
Miller reported thst tha ~1~~D1n. CaBmiae1o~ r.ccmm.ncie CD.~cl1 8pprDv~1
cf the Sign Ordh,&nce as dr,,,:'tnd (dai;'jd rnceived 7-14-80);; ,101:0() that
a public heariol ie not rBqa~rnd, bue caD be b.l~ if Council dHBiTI.lB.
Killer said he wocld prcfa~ :0 bmve ecma "}f tbe sign cDmmittee present
when ordinance is dlecue8ed~
AI' te:r discuss inn. C.. leh ton "''lV'''! to "ched:.ile uo'dt sellS! ans an '''IgllS t: lBth
aad 25th mud a Public He~~inG CD tbe Slla Ordinance oa Scpe.nber 8th at
'110u1:es of Reg"::,",: Gou",,~iJ ~"2et::ng
Page six
August 11, 1980
3:30 p.m. at Ehe VilLage Eall.
Motion vas silcotld,,6 by Wingert <Iud carz:i.ed "tlanirNusly.
OTHER BUSINES:;
Case No.. Z7-~__~_J{e(2e;3t to_ Va~at€: Ped~38trian lJa.y u Karth Lake. E.9ta~:;e!..L
Marcel Bibeas teirw. r
Council "'''8 re{en:;~'G to plat of l<arth Leite Estates indicating the
walkway easement ~7er the utility easement froD Karth Lake Circle to
Nursery Hill Lane, instead of ae originally depicted Crossing lots 12
aud ...iA
.
.
Crichton ~oved, 6cconded by Ban.on, tbat CouDcil approve vacation of
the existing walkvay easement subject to filing of appropriate dQcu-
m~Dts for walkway ~em~mcut ag ?resented ou 918t {dated 8/11/80).
Hotion cerried UD'H1.iIllO"..ly.
Northwestern Col1~ge Special_~~rllli: and Land~cape Bond
Council w~s referred to draft af Special Use Perait and McNlesh advised
of items ';rhich !lAC pending p1'1-:)1(' to issuance of n Building Parmit. which
~"cludea approval of plans by Fire Chief and City Engineer and receipt
o.f landscape bond. It was sllg,gegted that landscape bond could be tied
to occupancy. 1'l2th~" than the Building Permit.
Ia di8cu8~ion of tbe FiEe Chief's requirement tbat th~ entire building
be sprinkled ufor ssfety reasons" before grantins plan approval, It
was sugge!Jted tl:wt. McNiesl> advise Regnier of thi& requirement.
Crichton moved. cEconded by ~oodburn, that CouDcil authorize execution
of. the SpBcial Uce Perlllit as s~baitted, a~d eet the landscape bond
a~ $38,47.';, to b€, Hubmi I: t.ed pr:tor to bui Idlng OCCUP&l1oy. Ho tioD carried
uUllniaou.ly.
League of Min~~~~_Cltie8.:
Opiu:t~1l..O;,'ye)7 re I,eaguL.'Hfi"e Building Fi!,&ncitlll..
McHicab repo~ted A,den 3i1l&' dueu are to be $2,110 Dext year,
based OD preliminary 1980 CCUell& ligare of 7924 people.
HanSOD moved that Council favor the #1 paym~nt option. Motion
was secoude~ hy WiLg~rt.
In discussiDn, it vas Doted tbst thia p.yme&E option decision does
not conatitutu a cammit~aDt by cbe City. R~Niest said it is her
unde::stand.itl\8 that Cil3 iloard t~111. go withe!:e majcrit,. and w1.1l
treat all cities slite; building cost to Arden Hills would be
$4,220 (2 ~ ~21l0 OU0S).
Motion carried (HODson, Wingert, Cr.aeau vatlag in favor of the
motion; Crichton BDd Woodburn voting ia Dp}oslt1DU).
Lo c al_l!..2!'=!.!.!;~'.!l~.~.12:~I2....2t_~/1L!lP.&1l. aj A~~ </~<;/--;k:e dd: .J-
Coull':il C.(lIt(\'H:red t.hs.t,::o"ucil e"CO'Ei1g~~t ciugA,.A:l ,",cip'ients...{vcZu-0
equally and that there be a provision for levy limits to be adjusted
if necessary.
. P 1!.!!:L~~~..t:
lI..JU>L!JV '!!..&. .!iE':i a r" 1..q}i.:~~<t.:;;, 1: e n It is I" s tlZ~} ex.
Hanson mcved~ eeconded 111 Wingert~ t~at C01JDcil approve tlte
hiring of ae..rd L.Vand a~ rennl, ID~tructDr . $7.50 per etudaDt.
Hotim;, Ciut'j,eLl Ull.fH"i i,uQ'JG 1:"
liJ!..U.!' !rll.LJ!.L J, c, f f Sb.l f.L~.L"::..J> "l\I!!!:,!:",!:~~.!" i 2~E!,.!!~~,-e E~J:l.!J }'.'" !!.
Hallam, movel!, i!ecor>ded hf Wil1l\ert, tr",t Co',,,,,,U. ',<I,thoti:~e the
hiriag of Jeff Shaffer u. a sumner part IDBiateannce e~ployee @ $3.10
per hour fram August 11th to August 19tb .8 per Fuckley meRO of
8/11/80. Matio~ curriad un.Dimoa~l7.
UPOR'l" OF 'ULLAGE 'i'!':EASURER DONALD LAMB
I1""e. ElIlen ts
Al'gust 30th
$IOO,QOD @ 8.65% lD~Br.st B~ Fir.. NatioDal Bank, St. Pa~l.
to mstarB on J0gUa~y 26, 1901.
.,6-
Minutes of Regula~ Council Meeting
Page seyen
August 11. 1980
August 31st - $100,000 @ 6.;75% interest at First National Bank, St.
Paul, to mature on ~anuary 27, 1981.
Crich ton moyed, 8<3ccnded by HauBon., that Council ratify the Treasure r' s
report. Motion carried unarimously.
REPORT OF CLERK A))HINISTRATCIl CHARLOTTE !'.CNIESll
Storage Building Appraisals
Council was refer.ed to two appraiaals received from Real Estate
Maaters and ~ohanl1a Realty.
.
.
After discu8",ion >:e zoning B.ud pos"'ible uses pendtted in the residential
district, Council concurred thst the property be offered to the Lake
Jobanaa Volunteer Fire Depertment at a coat of $19,000; noting tbat a
Special Uae Permit is needed for "Public Uee8".
Insurance Con8ultant
McNi8ab reported that Mr. Pset hes sgreed to review and evaluate General
Iaaurance bids at a cost of $600-$800; includes written report doe. not
include attending Council meetings.
Crichton moved, seconded by Wingert. that Council authoria8 tbe hiring
of Mr. Peet as insurance cODsultant @ $600-$800. Motion carri8d unani-
mously.
Claims aDd 'ayrol~
Banson moyed, seconded
'ayroll .s sub.itted.
by Wiugert. that Council approve the Clai.s and
Kotion carried unaniaously.
Buckley M.mo Re Summer PlaYlround Program Staff Treat Expense
Council discussed the City's policy re expenditure of funds prior to
Council authoriwation; concurred that tbeee expenditures be autboriaed
before ratber than after the fact.
'etty Cas!tl ruud
McNiesh requested euthoriaetiou to continue "for general purposes" the
$15.00 petty cash fuud which wae originally insU.tuted for 'arks Play-
ground purposes during the sum.er.
Council concurred that Clerk Adminietrator continue to adm1nister the
petty cash fund for seneral purposes, 8S requested.
Blection Judges Approva!
Woodburn lloved. eecouded by Haneoo, ttu.t Coun cil approve the lis t of
Election Judges, 6'" submitted. Kotion carried unanimously.
!.ams.y CO'llnty Public Waters !nven.tory. Public Information Meeting
Council c,oncurred that Planning Commission Chairman Lynch be~ requested
to attend the meeting ou August 25th on bahalf of Arden Hills.
Special Attorney/Council Keeti!!.
A closed ~eetins ~.s scheduled On Monday, August 25th with Attorney
Lyndan at 1:00 p.m. to discuss pending litigatlon.
.
Adj ournmel!.!.
Woodburn moved, seconded by Cricbton, that
11:16 p.m. Motion carried una~imously.
~~,
Charlotte Heli8sh
Clerk Ad_inistrator
Notic. of Maetinge:
August 18th - 1,30 p.m. - Spseial Council Meeting.
AUiust 25th - 1:00 p.m. - Closed Council ~eeting.
August 25th - 7:30 p.m. - Regular Council Meeting.
-7-