Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 03-14-1983 . Minutes of Regular Council Meeting Village of Arden Hills Monday, March 14, 1983 - 7:30 p.m. Village Hall Call to Order Pursuant to due call, and notice thereof, Mayor Woodburn called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. . Roll Call Present - Mayor Robert Woodburn, Michael Christiansen, Councilmen Thomas Mulcahy, Diaae McAllister. Absent - Councilman Dale Hicks Also Present - Engineer Donsld Christoffersen, Bond Counsel Thomas Desna, Treasurer Donald Lamb, Planner Orlyn Miller, Clerk Administrator Charlotte McNiesh, Deputy Clerk Dorothy Zehm Approval of Minutes McAllister moved, seconded by Christiansen, that the Minutes of the February 28th Council meeting be approved as submitted. Motion carried unanimously (4-0). Business from the Floor None Improvement No. SS-83-2, Sewer Extension to 1315 Red Fox Road Mayor Woodburn opened the Public Hearing and Clerk Administrator McNiesh verified that the Notice of Hearing was published in the New Brighton Bulletin on March 3 and 10, 1983, and mailed to affected property owners. (See attached Minutes) In discussion, Christiansen said he tends to discount the plan for development of the Reiling property at this time; feels there is some benefit to the property for at least 650'. Mulcahy said he feels the entire assessment of $19,000 to the Nielsen property seems appropriate; cost seems manageable for the development; leaves the potential for development of the Reiling property clear. Mulcahy said he is slso thinking of a relatively short pay-off; would like to see it all paid in five years or less. Woodburn said he feels there is some benefit to the Reiling prop- erty; has had no frontage assessments to date; should be of bene- fit to both Reiling and Nielsen properties. McAllister said she feels the Reiling property does not indicate a ~need" at this point; agrees with Mulcahy. . It was noted that, mn order to proceed, four votes are needed to decide the method. Woodburn said he feels a combination is preferable; Council may wish to continue its deliberation until full five member Council. suggested there is a Christiansen moved to table the deliberations until the March 28th Council meeting. Motion was seconded by Mulcahy and carried unan- imously (4-0). REPORT OF VILLAGE ENGINEER DONALD CHRISTOFFERSEN Resolution No. 83-17, Approving Plans and Special Provisions for Intersection Revisions on T.H. 51 at Junction of Hamline and Snelling Avenues In discussion, Christiansen said he feels it still poses serious speed problems. Woodburn noted that a previous Council gave Minutes of Regular Council Meeting March 14, 1983 Page Two . preliminary approval of the plans; recognizes we have a different Council at this point, but the plan proposed is as previously approved. Noted that a similar plan, on Hwy. 12 toward Hudson, has resulted in cutting the accident experience in half. McAllister moved, seconded by Mulcahy, that Council adopt Resolu- tion No. 83-17, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR INTER- SECTION REVISIONS ON T.H. 51 AT JUNCTION OF HAMLINE AND SNELLING AVENUES. Motion carried (McAllister, Mulcahy, Woodburn voting in favor of the motion; Christiansen voting in opposition). (3-1). New BriRhton Interceptor Christoffersen reported that the Metro Council approved the New Brighton Interceptor on March 10th. . Bikeway Funds Council requested Christoffersen to apply for bikeway funds for the Lexington Avenue bikeways; also to advise Ramsey County that Arden Hills intends to apply for M.S.A. monies on Lexington. REPORT OF VILLAGE PLANNER ORLYN MILLER Case No. 83-4, Stewart Lumber - Site Plan Review and Sideyard Variance Council waa referred to Planning memo (2-24-83) and to Board of Appeals (2-26-83) and Planning Commission (3-2-83) recommendations. In review of the site plan and proposed location of a 36' x 96' addition to the existing office/storage building at the south edge of the site, Miller explained that by his interpretation, the lum- ber yard is a non-conforming use in tqe B-2 District; noted that the lumber yard apparently existed before incorporation of the City and, despite its nonconformity, the City has allowed it to eXPand at least twice in recent years. Miller explained that the lumber yard operates as a retail outlet; noted that this is apparently the interpretation in the past; sug- gested that the parcel should probably be re-zoned to 1-2, or the ordinance re-worded to accommodate the lumber yard as a conform- ing use. Some concern was expressed relative to amending the ordinance; would require incorporation at that time of certain State laws not now in effect ( e.g. use of park dedication for control of surface water, which State law doea not permit). (It was suggested that ambiguities noted in the current Zoning Ordinance be listed, for consideration when Council amends the Zoning Ordinance at some future date.) Miller reported that the Planning Commission considered the lumber yard a "permitted use" and therefore allowed to expand noted that their recommendation is to allow expansion by extending the existing 7' - 8' setback variance, with the contingency that the proposed white exterior siding be extended to include the exterior . of the existing building, and that a program of screening along Highway 10 be started within three months. Glen Medbery explained that he proposes an 8' projection for the proposed building to accommodate his storage needs and maneuver- ability of a forklift within the building. Noted that moving the building to the north 8', narrows the space between the proposed and existing buildings, making access to it impractical. Medbery said he would probably have to change the building location to another place on the lot, possibly vest of the second building (proposed location is preferable). Medbery said if the building width is reduced, it makes it impossible to move materials within the building; explained that aligning the building with the south line of the existing building is not practical. After discussion, Mulcahy moved, seconded by Christiansen, that Council approve a 17' setback variance from the south property line (3' setback) for the proposed 36' x 96' building addition. Motion failed (2-2) -2- ~inutes ,of Regular Council Meeting March 14, 1983 Page Three , (Mulcahy Christiansen voting in favor of the motion; McAllister, Woodburn voting in opposition). McAllister moved, seconded by Woodburn, that Council approve a variance to concur with the Planning Commiasion's recommendation, extending the existing building setback variance along the south property line. Motion failed. McAllister, Woodburn voting in favor of the motion; Christianaen, Mulcahy voting in oppoaition. . After further discussion, Mulcahy moved, seconded by Christiansen that Council approve the site plan with the proposed building at a location four feet north of the proposed location, approving a 13' variance (7' from south property line), based on the hard- ahip of locations of exiating buildinga on the site and usability of existing land for on-site storage. Motion carried unanimously (4-0) . Planning Commission Recommendation to Amend Zoning Ordinance Deferred Application for Drive-up Window - McDonalds Council was referred to Zehm's memo relstive to the appropriate application for a drive-up window at McDonalds. In discussion, Mulcahy said he is inclined to pursue it as a Special Use Permit situation because of a potential for "litter"; noted that if the application were coming in today, it would re- quire a Special Use Permit; therefore, feels the addition of a drive-up window would require a similar process; feels Special Use Permit is the better way to go. McAllister said they are changing from a "restaurant" to a "drive- in"; feels traffic is a significant problem now; it won't be less than it is now, with a drive-up window. After discussion, it was the general concensus of Council that the application be referred to the Planning Commission for site plan review. (It was Council's underatanding that if the Planning Commission determines a Special Use Permit is recommended, it will make the recommendation to Council.) Request for Permit to Vend Packaged Ice Cream Novelties from Mobile Ice Cream Truck In discussion, applicant explained that he has one truck; it will be driven less than 5 m.p.h. on residential streets, not on major thoroughfares; travels through an area once a day at a regular time each day; cost of items ranges from 25c to 65c. Applicant said he carries insurance and has a State Food Handler LIcense. After discussion, Mulcahy moved seconded by Christiansen, that Council approve the Itinerant Vendor Permit No.1. Motion car- ried (Mulcahy, Christiansen, Woodburn voting in favor of the motion; McAllister voting in opposition). . (It waa Council's understanding that the applicant will forward the required picture of himself to the Clerk Administrator (ordi- nance requirement) and that a separate permit will be requested, if anyone other than the applicant will be driving the ice cream vehicle in Arden Hills.) Ordinance No. 229 - Adopting Uniform Fire Code Council was referred to draft of Ordinance No. 229. It was noted that districts must be established under Section 4. Establishment of Limits of Districts in Which Storage of Flammable or Combus- tible Liquids and Bulk Storage of Liquefied Petroleum Gases are to be Prohibited. Council referred this Section to Planner Miller to assist Council in establishing the appropriate districts. -3- Minutes of Regular Council Meeting March 14, 1983 Page Four . Ordinance No. 230, Amending Ordinance No. 226, Cable Communications Ordinance McAllister moved, seconded by Christiansen, that Council intro- duce Ordinance No. 230 by title, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 226, KNOWN AS THE CABLE COMMUNICATIONS ORDINANCE. Motion carried unanimously (4-0). McAllister moved, seconded by Christiansen, that Council suspend the rules and adopt Ordinance No. 230. Motion carried unanimously (4 -0) . Advertisement for Bids - 1983 Diseased Tree and Stump Removal Contract McAllister moved, seconded by Mulcahy, that Council authorize Advertisement for Bids for 1983 Diseased Tree and Stump Removal. Motion carried unanimously (4-0). . Bids to Replace Carpeting - Office Area Council was referred to Johansen's memo (3-11-83) listing three bids for re-carpeting of the Village Hall office area. In discusaion, Council noted that the Council will be faced with budget cuts in a couple months; concern wes expressed relative to this expenditure at this time. Council concurred that the re-carpeting could be delayed until budget cuts are known, poaaibly until Mayor June at the earliest. Bids for Public Works Pickup Truck Council was referred to Johansen's memo (3-11-83) listing four quotes received for a ~ ton pickup tr4ck. After diSCUSSion, Christiansen moved, seconded by Mulcahy, that Council authorize the purchaae of a ~ ton Dodge pickup truck from White Bear Dodge, as per memo; cost to not exceed $7,277.00. Motion carried unanimouSly (4-0). Agreement Between Arden Hills/Shoreview for Operation and Maintenance of Lexington Avenue Bikeway Woodburn read draft of Resolution No. 83-20, RESOLUTION AUTHOR- IZING A JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITIES OF ARDEN HILLS AND SHOREVIEW FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF CERTAIN BIKE PATHS, and draft of JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS AND THE CITY OF SHOREVIEW FOR MAINTENANCE OF CERTAIN BIKEWIlYS McAllister moved, seconded by Mulcahy that Council adopt Reso- lution No. 83-20 as presented. Motion carried unanimously (4-0). McAllister moved, seconded by Christiansen, that Council approve the Arden Hills/Shoreview Joint Powers Agreement as presented. Motion carried unanimoualy (4-0). ReSOlution No. 83-18, Opposing Proposed Ramsey County Motel/Hotel Tax Council was referred to proposed draft of Resolution No. 83-18, lESOLUTION OPPOSING PROPOSED RAMSEY COUNTY HOTEL/MOTEL TAX. . After discussion, McAllister moved, seconded by Mulcahy, that Council adopt Resolution No. 83-18, as amended. Motion carried unanimously (4-0). OTHER BUSINESS Resolution No. 83-19, A RESOLUTION CONGRATULATING THE 1983 MOUNDS VIEW HIGH SCHOOL BOYS' SWIMMING AND DIVING TEAM McAllister moved, seconded by Mulcahy, that Council adopt Reso- lution No. 83-19, A RESOLUTION CONGRATULATING THE 1983 MOUNDS VIEW HIGH SCHOOL BOYS' SWIMMING AND DIVING TEAM. Motion carried unanimouSly (4-0). -4- . .Minutes'of Regular Council Meeting March 14, 1983 Page Five Public Safety Committee Meeting Chriatiansen agreed to attend the Public Safety Committee meeting on March 21st (McAllister has a conflict). Finance Committee MeetinR Christiansen reported that he will be out of town March 24-27 and will consequently miss the Finance Committee meeting on the 24th. McAllister agreed to attend. . Two Petitions from Local Residents Woodburn reported that he has arranged to visit the two subject sites with Code Enforcement Officer Larry Squires on Thursday,. March 17th. It was suggested that they also look at the site of the Skjelstad complaint in the same area of the city. REPORT OF CLERK ADMINISTRATOR CHARLOTTE MC NIESH Approval of 1983 Licenaes - Big Ten Supper Club and Sitzmark Ski Shop McNiesh explained that the listed licenaes have been assessed penalties for late payment; noted that the listed licenses are all renewals. Christiansen moved, seconded by Mulcahy, that Council approve the 1983 licenses as listed. Motion carried unanimously (4-0). 1982 Cash Financial Statement McNiesh reported that the 1982 Cash Financial Statement is recommended by the Finance Committee f~r approval. It was noted that the General Fund Reserves actually decreased in 1982. Christiansen moved, seconded by McAllister, that Council approve the transfers and accept the 1982 Cash Financial report as sub- mitted. Motion carried unanimously (4-0) Approval to Employ Darlene Scott McAllister moved, seconded by Mulcahy, that Council authorize the employment of Darlene Scott at $5.10/hour as clerk/typist. Motion carried unanimously (4-0). Claims and Payroll Christiansen moved, seconded by McAllister, that Council approve the Claims and Payroll as submitted. Motion carried unanimously (4-0) . Pizza Hut Request for Temporary Banner McNiesh reported that the Pizza Hut, in Arden Plaza, has requested permission to advertise a "Personal Pan Pizza" program, by posting a banner on the front of the building for 4-6 weeks. . In discussion, concern was expressed that the banners destrDY the appearance of the center and distracts from other business places. Council generally concurred that the use of banners is not encour- aged. McAllister moved, seconded by Mulcahy, that Council approve the temporary banner for 4-6 weeks. Motion carried unanimously (4-0). Special Council Meeting A Special Council meeting was scheduled at 7:00 p.m. on March 24th at the Mounds View City Hall to discuss the Anoka County/Blaine airport. Letter from Ramsey County Parks and Recreation Department to John Buck ley Council was referred to letter from Ramsey County Parks and Recreation Department re Bike Trail - Lake Josephine. -5- Minutes of Regular Council Meeting March 14, 1983 Page Six '. Council concurred that the bike trail does not impact Arden Hills; therefore, no action is necessary. Adjournment Christiansen moved, journ at 11:54 p.m. seconded by McAllister, that the meeting ad- Motion carried unanimously (4-0). ~ //LIL;3iJJJ1J/~L Charlotte McNiesh Clerk Administrator /~~~ f/ obert . Woodburn Mayor . Notice of Meeting Special Council Meeting - March 24th at 7:00 p.m. at Mounds View City Hall. Regular Council Meeting - March 28th at 7:30 p.m. at Arden Hills Village Hall. . -6- . . . Extract of Minutes of Meeting of City Council City of Arden Hills Ramsey County, Minnesota Held: March 14, 1983 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Arden Hills, Minnesota, was duly held in the City Hall in said City on Monday, March 14, 1983, at 7:30 o'clock p.m. The following members were present: Mayor Woodburn and Councilmen McAllister, Christiansen and Mulcahy; and the follow- ing was absent: Councilman Hicks. Also in attendance were Charlotte McNiesh, City Clerk Ad- ministrator; Dorothy Zehm, Deputy Clerk, Donald Lamb, City Trea- surer; Thomas Deans of Peterson, Popovich, Knutson & Flynn, City Bond Consultant and Donald Christoffersen, City Engineer. MAYOR WOODBURN: We'll open the public hearing relative to Improvement No. SS-83-2, Sewer Extension to 1315 Red Fox Road. Mrs. McNiesh, was the Notice of Hearing published? CHARLOTTE MC NIESH: Yes, I have an affidavit of publication that the Notice was published in the New Brighton Bulletin on March 3rd and 10th and I have a certificate of mailing that cer- tifies that the notices were deposited in the post office at New Brighton on March 3rd. MAYOR WOODBURN: Engineer Christoffersen,will you briefly de- scribe the proposed improvement? DON CHRISTOFFERSEN: The proposed project is an extension of the sanitary sewer to the Nielsen property located on the north side of Red Fox Road adjacent to S.T.H. 51. The approximate location of inplace sanitary sewei is here, about one-half the distance between Highway 51 and Lexington; the City pumping station is here, on the south side of Red Fox Road. The nearest inplace sanitary sewer to the Nielsen property is approximately 900 feet to the east. West of the inplace sBaitary sewer along Red Fox Road, the surface elevation decreases. The elevation of a west- erly extension of aanitary sewer increases; therefore a gravity . Extract of Minutes March 14, 1983 Page 2 sewer at minimum grade can only be extended to the west about 650 feet. Beyond this point the sewer would not have sufficient cover and would have to be pumped. We have investigated two options: one is to construct gravity sanitary sewer westerly along the north r.o.w. of Red Fox Road approximately 650' or so to a point where we can get 6 or 7 feet of cover; from this point on we propose force main service for about 310 feet to some type of interior pumping station, probably within the building; sewage would be held in a holding tank until they get a sufficient amount of water in the tank, and it would then be pumped out from the building within the site to. the force ~ main to a point where it can be handled by gravity. The second option is relatively simple; it is simply to construct a force main all the way to the existing sanitary sewer. The advantage of option one over option two is the fact that if the development of the Reiling property at the west end is similar to the development on the east end, there would be some sewer available along Red Fox Road. Either option is feasible from an engineering standpoint. Thomss Deans, I believe will explain the f;bnancing. MAYOR WOODBURN: topography of the option? Before we get to that point, will you review the land in this area and the cost estimates of each DONALD CHRISTOFFERSEN: The lay of the land falls off in this direction, ~n other words from this high elevation to a low eleva- tion here. I believe it does rise again just around this corner. This portion slopes toward th~ road, but the back portion slopes away. It has been graded; is hard to determine, but it generally slopes away. According to the contour map, it does slope away to the north. The total estimated costs of option one is $24,000 and option two is $19,300. I'll be happy to answer any other questions you might have. MAYOR WOODBURN: Perhaps at this time we'll go on to Thomas Deans to explain financing. There will be time for more questiona later on, I'm sure. ~ THOMAS DEANS: Mayor and members of the Council. The improvement was petitioned for by Mr. Nielsen. His property does not comprise over 35% of the affected property; thus, improvement will be con- sidered Council initiated, and we will need a 4/5 majority. Again, it is pointed out that there are two options as to how it is to be done. The first option is $24,000. His recommendation would be a combination of a footage assessment at $16.18/foot estimated now, between the Reiling property and the Nielsen prop- erty and then a force main service charge of $5600. Wherein option two would entirely be a force main service charge of $19,300 approximately at this point. This would be assessed over what- ever priod of time you determine. Extract of Minutes March 14, 1983 Page 3 MAYOR WOODBURN: Thank you. Mrs. McNiesh are there any written comments on the proposal? CHARLOTTE MC NIESH: None, your honor. MAYOR WOODBURN: Thank you. Then, we'll open the Public Hearing to comments from the audience. We will start with anyone who wishes to comment. . TIM NELSON: Honorable Council and Mayor, my name is Tim Nelson. I'm attorney for the applicant J.L.N. Development. Our prefer- ence is the obvious one, to put in the gravity system for the length it can be and the force main for the smaller portion. We feel the combination of gravity and force main will serve future growth of the western portion of the Reiling property and it would be more reasonable and farsighted on the part of the City to provide for potential growth of Mr. Reiling's property. We think that standards should apply and that it ia clear from (in- audible) Minnesota Case (inaudible) interpreting the statutes, that some benefit by way of increased property value would re- sult to Mr. Reiling's property for the portion served by this improvement. The (inaudible) feels that it is not that it necessarily improves the current use of his property but has some potential future benefit however it might develop. The statutes are pretty clear on that. (inaudible) another option was considered at one point in time and that was a private septic and drainfield system. Our engin- eer (inaudible) B.R.W. has indicated that the private system is not a realistic or feasible alternative at this point in time because (inaudible) of the soils makeup in this area and because of (inaudible) maintenance problems in the future. (inaudible) probably the most important reason is that the approved plan for the property would require a complete restructuring for an on site sewer system. (inaudible) The Boss/Nielsen property has been subject to previous assessments in the past for water, sewer and storm sewer; has one payment left on a 1963 sewer assessment relating to the trunk line through the Reiling property and there is the $4500 storm sewer assessment last year. It would be rather cruel irony to have paid for sewer assessments over the years (inaudible) improvement which was de- signed to aid the industrial property in the area and then (in- audible) not be able to develop the property because it is not served with a similar sewer as other properties (inaudible) to recap, the force sewer line (inaudible) cheaper in the short run but more expensive in the long run in that the likelihood is great that the Reiling property will be developed and will re- quire sewer service on some portion of the property, and converse- ly the gravity system is flexible providing for additional develop- ment on the Reiling property (inaudible) request option number one which provides gravity sewer and the shorter force main service to the Nielsen property. . . Ex~ract of Minutes March 14, 1983 Page 4 MAYOR WOODBURN: Thank you. May I ask if I heard the figures right Mr. Deans? Adding them up, I don't come to the right figures $16.80 was One proposal per foot? THOMAS DEANS: $16.18/foot. According to the proposed figures would be $14,565 to the Reiling property and $9,435 for the Nielson property and the force main service charge would be $5600. MAYOR WOODBURN: And the latter is to be divided how? THOMAS DEANS: (inaudible) I don't understand the question. ~ MAYOR WOODBURN: I don't want to ask too many questions now. I'll come back to that. Excuse me. We're in public discussion now. Any Comments? Mr. Reiling. GEORGE REILING: My name is George Reiling, most of you know me. (inaudible) I think the attorney for Mr. Nielsen is wrong on two points. (inaudible) don't know how he would know what I. have in mind for my property (inaudible) as to future intentions for the use of my property. I had this sketch prepared by (inaudible) Carley of my proposed use of this property (inaudible) you can see no use of the proposed sewer extension; this property was assessed on both sides, double assessment for this sewer; it serves the property both ways. (inaudible) I was opposed to this assessment then but engineer (inaudible) explained (inaudible) he was right and I was wrong. This part will be developed in one or two pieces; a sewer connection to Red Fox Rosd would not be beneficial to us. The City csnnot show an increased value to our property. I don't think you can show thst this increases the value of our property by at least the cost of the assessment. I want to emphasize this (inaudible). If Nielsen property is worth developing, it is worth the sewer cost. MAYOR WOODBURN: Mr. Christoffersen. DONALD CHRISTOFFERSEN: Both properties were assessed an area charge for the inplace sanitary sewer previously. Neither was assessed a front footage charge. MAYOR WOODBURN: development west this see tion? Mr. Reiling, why do you propose such a different of the section line from the portion east of GEORGE RE ILING: (inaudib Ie) you can't pu t a res tauran t way down there~ must have large development to the west. We anticipate smaller businesses east of the line. COUNCILMAN MULCAHY: I favor a major development over small lots. GEORGE REILING: We intend to double the size of Emerald Inn. ~ ~ ~ . Extract of Minutes March 14, 1983 Page 5 MAYOR WOODBURN: I'm concerned about how land will be developed west of the sewer line. I see you propose to develop this in one or two pieces at most. Mr. Christoffersen, will the western 250' of the Reiling property have to be pumped into sewer? DONALD CHRISTOFFERSEN: It would depend on what develops in the area; property is high along the existing sewer line; the ele- vations here are 936.7, 933.6, 935.7, 935.1, 937.2 varies about 4' at most; there is a saddle on the property (inaudible) GEORGE REILING: There is 900' between Nielsen and mine. Force main proposed is about 250' on my property. We'd be assessed for 250' we cannot use. We don't need the sewer, and we don't want it. COUNCILMAN MC ALLISTER: front footage assessment assessed at this time? The Reiling property has had no previous for sanitary sewer? (inaudible) can it THOMAS DEANS: I am not aware of previous assessment or City assessment practices, but assessments should be determined at the assessment hearing. (Some inaudible discussion). MAYOR WOODBURN: If there are no additional comments, I will close the public hearing at 8:23 p.m. In discussion, Christiansen said he tends to discount the sketch plan for development of the Reiling property at this time; feels there appears to be some benefit to the property for at least 650' . Mulcahy said he feels the entire assessment of $19,000 to the Nielsen property seems appropriate; cost seems manageable for the development; leaves the potential for development of the Reiling property clear. Mulcahy said he is also thinking of a relatively short payoff; would like to see it all paid in five years or less. Woodburn said he feels there is some benefit to the Reiling prop- erty; has had no frontage assessments to date; should be of bene- fit to both Reiling and Nielsen properties. McAllister said she feels the Reiling property does not indicate a "need" at this point; agrees with Mulcahy. Mulcahy noted that in order to adopt a resolution ordering the construction of Improvement No. SS 83-2, four votes are needed. Woodburn said he feels a combination is preferable; sug@ested that Council may wish to continue its deliberation until there is a full five. member Council. Christiansen moved to table the deliberstions until the March 28th Council meeting. Motion was seconded by Mulcahy and carried unanimoUSly. ~ . 1983 LICENSE APPLICATIONS PENDING - NEED COUNCIL APPROVAL Big Ten Supper Club 4703 No. Hwy. 10 Restaurant Juke Box Juke Box Game Mschine Game Machine Sitzmark Ski Shop 1160 W. Co. Rd. E Retail Sales $25.00 15.00 15.00 40.00 40.00 25.00