Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 01-11-1983 . . ... Minutes of Regular Council Meeting Village of Arden Hille Tuesday, January 11, 1983-7:30 p.m. Village Hall Call to Order Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Woodburn called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. Roll Call Present - Mayor Robert Woodburn, Councilmen Dale Hicks, Diane McAllister, Thomae Mulcahy, Michael Christiansen Absent - None Aleo Preeent - Treasurer Donald Lamb, Planner Orlyn Miller, Clerk Administrator Charlotte McNieeh, Deputy Clerk Doro thy Zehm Approval of Minutes Hicks moved, seconded by McAllieter, that the Minutes of the December 27th and January 3rd Council meetinge be approved as sub- mitted with the possible change to the December 27th minutes, after verification of number of years representation on cable com- mission is based on 1/5000 population, before amendable (p.2, 2nd paragraph of Cable Commiesion Report). Motion carried unanimously (5-0). Business from the Floor None REPORT OF VILLAGE PLANNER ORLYN MILLER Case No. 82-25, Amended Special Use Permits - Preebyterian Homes of Minnesota Miller reviewed the initial plan, consisting of 52 clueter unite in nine buildings, which wss preeented at the December let Public Hearing; noted that concerns were expressed by neighbors to the east (Shorewood Drive) and neighbors to the north (Sandeen Road). Miller reported that, subsequent to hearing, separate meetings have been held with the residents of both areas in an effort to resolve their concerns. Miller suggested thst it seems appropri- ate to eeparate the two areas since the north area concerns in- volve the existing site, while the concerns of the easterly resi- dents relate to the proposed new cluster unit development of the site. Miller reported that the Planning Commission recommended approval of a revised plan consisting of 44 units in 7 etructures, with 7 contingencies (listed in Planning Commission Minutes of Dec. 1, 1983). Miller reported that the grading and drainage plans have been given verbsl approval by RCWD, and the City Engineer said he has no problem with the plans as presented to RCWD. Miller re- ported that the Planning Commiesion, at its January 5th meeting, reviewed the revised site plan and landecape plan and unanimously recommen~approval thereof contingent upon the applicant addrees- ing the .landscaping concerns at the Sandeen Road access drive and along the east property line (Shorewood Drive). Miller reported that approval of the plans by the Fire Dept. has not been received to date, nor has appropriate accees to the City lift station been resolved. Miller said he understands the appli- cant has agreed to provide an easement for the Koepp driveway across Presbyterian Homes property to Shorewood Drive. Miller re- ported that the sccees drive from County Rd. D to the Sutton Place eite remains unresolved; City Engineer recommends a 32' wide (street widt~ single access drive rather than the boulevard access recom- mended by the Planning Commission (divided access). Miller re- ported that the revised plan does provide the 70' building set- back from the east property line, recommended as the 7th contin- gency of approval. Minutee of Regular Council Meeting January 11, 1983 Page Two .. Miller reported that he has requested that more specifics relative to the pedestrian "linkage" be presented by the applicant. Reverend Hagstrom described the proposed development as meeting the housing nee de of the more active elderly 70-75 year bracket, wanting to avail themeelves to health services etc. provided by Presbyterian Homes; noted that the revised plan is presented in response to concerns expreesed at the December 1st public hearing and the revised landscaping ie proposed as the result of meetings with neighbors relative to their concerne; reported that RCWD approval has been received and an agreement has been reached with Mr. Koepp and his attorney for a driveway easement. .. Architect Dave Shea described the proposed cluster unit site con- sisting of four 8-unit structuree and three 4-unit structures for a total of 44 units; noted that two 4-unit structures were re- moved, providing greater aeparation between the remaining build- ings. Shea presented elevations of the one and two story struc- tures as seen from the County Road D and Shorewood Drive areas, and described the individual units; which comprise a living room, kitchen and dining area, bath and two bedrooms (or one bedroom and denlShea indicated the common areas within the buildings, consist- ing of community room, laundry facilities, lockers and accese to the between building links and garages. Mr. Ed Reid received the revieed landscape plan which includes berms with various sized plantings of trees and ehrubs as indi- cated, low prairie grass on steep areas and mowed graes where it can be eaeily maintained. Reid noted various plantings proposed, and approximate sizes to effectively screen the site from residen- tial areas to the east and eouth. Reid explained that after meet- ing with Mr. Seaberg, relative to his concerns, berms will be low- ered to about 2 feet and plantings eoftened at the separation between his property and the Presbyterian Homee site. Reid indi- cated the pathway system which is proposed between the upper and lower portions of the site. . Miller assessed the revieed plan as it compares to the original proposal: Number of Units: Site Coverage: Original Proposal 52 19.9% 17.3% 37.2% 62.8% 40' to 45' 28' 133' 19' to 45' 18.4 DU/A 6 . 9 DU I A 11.5 Du/A 5.8 DU/A 286* Buildings Parking/Hardcover Total Coverage Landscaped Space Setbacks: Front East Property Length: Separation Total Site: Line Building Building Deneity, Actual Units S.F. Equivalency Area: Actual Units S.F. Equivalency Density, Undeveloped Parking *InQludes 20 stall north of Lakeview Residence Revised Proposal 44 . ~ 18.4% 16.4% 34.8% 65.2% 40' to 45' 70' 120' to 133' 30' to 75' 18 .0 DU I A 6.7 DU/A 9.8 Du/A 4.9 DU/A 280* . Miller was asked to comment briefly On the "Notes to Axden Hilla Council pertaining to Presbyterian Home's Phase II", which was signed by several Shorewood Drive residents, and delivered to Council members. Miller noted that many of the concerns expreesed related to the initial plan and previous discussions pertaining to the Sutton Place and geriatrics development plans. Miller explained that his site coverage calculations were based on the survey provided by Shea Architects; suggested that the survey of the Presbyterian Homes site be verified relative to its accuracy; noted that the survey indicates water coverage of a portion of the site shown as land On the section map. -2- Minutes of Regular Council Meeting January 11, 1983 . Page Three Miller suggested that previous comments at meetings relative to previous development of the site mayor may not be relevant to changed conditions, unless made a condition of ~he Special Use Permit. Miller noted that the two additional units constructed in Sutton Place, to replace a meeting room, were approved by Council. Miller suggested that the specific plan be assessed for the proposed cluster unite, which has accompliehed what the Plan- ning Commieeion deeired. Miller noted he has some concerns rel- ative to the linkage eystem, how it will work and look. . Comments and Questions: Hicke said he is generally impressed with the proposal; is con- cerned with density; noted that the deneity of the total eite al- ready exceeds the R-2 density maximum; would like to apply the medium density maximum of 4.5 units/acre requiring that the num- ber of cluster units be reduced by 20. M~Allister requested a re-cap of the parking provisions; feels the existing parking is not adequate. In discussion it was noted that about 20 cars are currently parked northeast of the chapel, and included in the parking count, which ehould probably not be counted - area was required to remain as a fire lane by the Fire Dept. Miller noted that the proposed 280 parking stalls include the 20 stalls in this area; if not included, number of stalls still exceeds the 233 spaces for which they have projected a need. Christiansen said his concern is not with density but with the link eystem and how it will work. How they will be secured, was queried, and whether or not they will be heated and cooled; also queried wae the scale of the gazebo proposed to house the lift. Mulcahy said the landscape plan,particularly the perimeter plant- ing, repreeente a eound approach; asked about the location and philosophy of the links; will the residents need the links to get to the main building and is it essential that the residents walk to the main building. Fenstad explained that it is their experience that residents feel the complex is their home; want to be involved in the activities and not considered as visitors; elderly prefer to walk instead of having to drive or be driven everywhere. Hagstrom eaid the practical aepect is that the care center ie in the northwest area and most of the residents need therapy of one sort or another; all residents are required to have the noon meal in the main building. Brad Lemberg noted that the chapel is located in the north portion of the site; noted the links are needed to enable residents to get to chapel and church; walking provides exercise desired by the residents and ie their deeired means of getting places in the fa- cility - library, craft rooms, thereapy, programs etc. . Woodburn asked if the cluster unit residents will be at the same level of activity as those at Sutton Place? The answer was,yes. It was noted that two existing pathways are nOw used to get to the main building, but eheltered walks are really needed for the elderly for about 6 months in this climate. In further diecussion, Miller compared the height of the proposed etructure with surrounding reeidential areas; noted that none of the etructures exceed the 35' maximum height requirement. Noted that the roof pitch may be higher, floor levels are about the same as those on County Rd. D; noted that eaat/weet elevations are fairly close (1'-2'); north/south elevation at northeast 4-unit structure is about 6' above that of the Seaberg h~use on Shorewood Drive. The propoeed cluster units were described to be rental units, the same ae Sutton Place; all will be owned by Presbyterian Homes. Air conditioning for each building was described to be centrally located in the mechanical equipment areae. -3- Minutes of Regular Council Meeting January 11, 1983 Page Four - Reid reported that he hae not experienced any difficulty in establishing prairie grass; explained it must be seeded in August noted it takes about one year to establish; must be mowed twice a year to control it and to keep out the weeds. The propoaed retaining walls were at three points on top of the hill. Reid said they will not be seen because of the dense plant- ing of medium/high shrubs. George Clark, 3175 Shorewood Drive, expressed concern relative to the walled in effect of the building linke: noted his father . enjoye walking the Presbyterian Homes pathways and visiting with . the residents, when he comes to visit. Architect Shea explained that the links will have sliding panels; intent is to provide for open flow of pedestrians (reeidents and neighbors); intent is to make them appear ae transparent as possible; explained that the gazebo must be large enough to accommodate the approximate 8'xI0' electric cart lift; Hagetrom explained the necessity of eecuring the links at night; noted various incidents which have occurred the last 3-4 years, making it necessary to secure all access points to the buildings. Mr. Maynard Reynolds, 3159 Shorewood Drive, said he is concerned that the long walls will be often closed; feels it represents an over protective design; said they walk their dog on the Presby- terian Homes property; feels the wall segregates the community from the Pres. Homes grounds; reminds him of a "special city for the elderly". Reynolde said he feels the northern structure should be removed; sees it as a visual problem; also wants the wall removed and the density reduced to the expectations of the community; noted he had assumed the additional units would be On the school property, not on the lower level, after a previous discussion relative to Sutton Place. Ed Reid explained that the walkway sight line is proposed to be eoftened by plantings which will reduce the sight of the walkway to virtually zero, from Shorewood Drive properties. Dave Seaberg said he can see the reasons for the connecting links, and the reasons for security at night; suggested a centrally lo- Cated over head ramp connection between the two levels of the site, rather than the perimeter ground level wall connections; also noted that when Sutton Place was remodeled, the original townhouse bUildings were to be eliminated from the lower site and relocated to the Sutton Place property in phase II. Hagstrom referred Council to drawings of the Sutton Place develop- ment phases I & II; noted that approval of school building remodel- ling did not include the phase II 80 unit apartment development proposed on the remainder of the site; with the apartment proposal the lower site townhouses were no longer anticipated. Lyle Baker, Shorewood Drive, said he feels the links will wall . out the neighbors; feels the slidin~ panels will be difficult to maintain and be bent and therefore closed most of the time. Suggested if representatives make statements that they will do, or nOt do, eomthing, they should not be permitted to get out of it a few years later; asked that the lower site unit be removed and the walkways connecting it to the upper level building and main build- ing ae well; suggested that if the additional units are needed, the building be moved to the upper site along County Road D, where residents apparently have no complaints. Curt Fritze, Presbyterian Homes Building Committee Chairman,noted that nothing ie poured in concrete; the intent has been expressed; if density is sufficient On the Sutton Place Site, then it may not be needed elsewhere; euggested we all stop worrying about the paSt and consider the plan at hand. -4- . , Minutes of Regular Council Meeting ,January ii, 1983 Page Five Baker said he feels a promise is being broken; realizee that the Pres. Homes site could be fenced in its entirety, but they have always opened their grounds to the neighbors and he wants this to continue. . George Bass, Shorewood Drive, said his problem ie with density, the number of units and aeethetics; prairie graes "does it"; said he ie also concerned about ecology; feels rabbits, pheaeants, partridge, birds, shrubs etc. will go; said he lik. the plan ba- sically; feels residential area is in jeopardy; city hae three large inetitutions; feels that the Pree. Homes/neighbor meetings have accompliehed nothing; church ehould be sensitive to people; wanUi the lower site building and wall eliminated. Jerry Fenetad said he is also a resident and is employed by Pres. Homes; knows the philosophy of the home; ststed hie fsmily sleo utilizes the Pres. Homea property; noted that it is, however, private property. Fenstad said he sees how the linke will work; noted that they will be opened to the neighbors, as well as the reeidents of the home; Pres. Homes does not want to shut the neighbors off; sheltered walkways are needed for elderly (not to exclude neighbors). Fenstad said it ie not our desire to fence the property; facility is not an "inetitution" but a"home" for the residents; noted that its purpoee is to provide a "home" and services for our elderly; noted that it is open to all who live in the area. Hagstrom noted that they have hatched partridges in the Pres. Homes courtyards; are also intereeted in ecology; woods and garden areas will remain. Baker said he has no question about the miseion of Presbyterian Homes, which we applaod. Wayne Johnson, 3153 Johanna Blvd., said he is a resident of the area and wae an employee of Pres. Homes; noted that he works with other nursing homee; noted that the link syetem concept is gain- ing ac cep tance and is unique in the S tate and in the Coun try, feels the links are needed in inclement weather; without them, the people do not get out to attend the programs or avail themselves of the other facilities of the home. Mr. Reynolds said that community plans are shaped by expectations; if comments are made, people should be able to rely on them;" feels this ie the basis of our problems. Fritze said the current Comprehensive Plan ia the controlling plan; when you change one part, you have to make changes elsewhere; noted that plans do change. . Donald Lamb asked the restrictions on residente who will live in the cluster units. Hagstrom said they must be a minimum of 65 years of age; can remain as long as they can take care of them- selvee in the units; noted that nursing care is not provided in the units; explained that loneliness, nutrition, physical being of spouee etc. are reasons people desire this type of home. McAllister asked about day care programs provided for the elderly. Hagstrom eaid that adult day care has about 40 adults registered; 15-20 people/day are transported by Pres. Homes buaee; also have a home health program and homemakers and home helpers, short term care, in addition to respite care (30 days). Hagstrom said neigh- borhood groups come in for varioue activities; also have our own welfare program, which is not government eubsidized. Hagstrom said they are concerned about the walkways; people have to get to the main building; residents of Sutton Place are isolated in the winter months and in rainy and/or windy weather; noted that connecting links are provided in the downtown areas by sky ways to get people from building to building. -5- Minutes of Regular Council Meeting January 11, 1983 Page Six . Hicks noted that one of the Council's determinations is whether or not the cluster units can be defined as "institutional hous- ing"; asked how a sky way link would be received to link the two levels of the site. Dave Shea eaid it would have to cross over the woods and garden area to connect to the lower site building; profile would be much greater than the ground profile connection; it would have to cross the parking lot, making it difficult to move cars through to uti- lize the parking areas. Mulcahy noted that the proposed northeast building seems to be of . moat concern; asked if the concern is one of a "broken agreement" or a viaual problem, impacting the properties on Shorewood Drive. Mr. Baker said he does not know what the purchase agreement was when Sutton Place was purchased; knows that they were told the townhousee would be placed on the Sutton Place property if the Sutton Place approval was given. Baker said his second iseue is the ~ mile of wall - we don't want this area walled in. Hagstrom explained that the school was purchased with no commit- mente relative to how it could be used; we hoped for it, but the purchase wae not contingent upon an agreement to renovate the school as Sutton Place. McAlliater said her concern is density - site is zoned R-2 and abuts R-1; feels the density needs to be minimized to not advereely impact on the adjacent R-1; suggeeted one large building may be more acceptable and certainly more efficient to operate, and would eliminate the need for links; suggested thie be considered. McAllieter said she feels pressured into making a decision when other alternatives could be considered. Mulcahy said he feele some action should be taken; some indication relative to the proposal and/or some direction should be given. Mulcahy moved, seconded by Christtansen, that Council approve the amendment of the Special Use Permits to approve the 44 unit Sutton Place multiple housing as proposed. Hicks said he feels the motion needs to be amended because of density concerns; noted thst the appropriate density should be determined; also said he feels there is a real need for corridors, which he feels could be centralized and not around the perimeter of the site. After further discussion, Hicks moved, seconded by McAllister, that Council set the density at 25 dwelling units. Motion did not carry (Hicks and McAllister voting in favor; Mulcahy, Christiansen, Woodburn voting in opposition. (2-3). McAllister moved, seconded by Hicks, that the 4-unit northeast building, plus one 8-unit building be eliminated, reducing the number of units to 32. Motion carried (McAllister, Hicks, Woodburn voting in ~avor of the motion, Christiansen and Mulcahy voting in Oppoeition) (3-2).. . Shea commented that the feasibility of the project at 44 units was considered doubtful; at 32 units, it would probably be impos- sib Ie. (Recess was requested by Applicant) Mr. Baker, speaking for his neighbors, said they can live with the density if the northeast building is eliminated and the links con- necting it to the main building. Shea said it may be poesible to remove the northeast building if it can be incorporated on the upper site; said that the link to the main building can be re-designed and landscaped; feels a con- necting link to the main building can be worked out in a different manner which will be compatible to the neighborhood. -6- . .Minutee of Regular Council Meeting January 11, 1983 'Page Seven In responee, Mr. Baker said we want access to the woods for walks; don't want any thing to get in the way; we recognize the need for links, but the neighbors also have needs. Shea said the link is needed; it will be more difficult and more expeneive to construct without the building; it is not feasible to construct it underground. . Number of units considered to be acceptable ty Council members were: Hicks - 44 not acceptable McAllister - 40, if northeast building is eliminated Christiansen - 44 units Mulcahy - 44 units Woodburn - 40 units McAllister eaid she has difficulty with the neighborhood feeling that they have rightful access to traverse the woods and gardens of Presbyterian Homes, which ie private property. Baker said we don't want this to end. Hagstrom noted an alternate pathway from the east neighborhood along the lake and around the main building; which is also open to area residents. Hagstrom eaid they try to allow outside accese, but do have to control it at times; noted that a compromise must be reached; stated their first consideration is for the elderly residente; explained it is important for the home to link up our people; noted there are about two miles of pathways, even if the link is built ae proposed; links must have security doors. Reid said he is confident the desired linkage can be planned with the neighbors and re-designed; feels the grade can be adjusted for the connection. It wae stated that 44 units was considered to be our bottom line; if we can work out something at 40 units, we will if it is feas- ible. Miller noted that the alternate access drive has not been Aie- cussed; explained that a boulevard access (2 16' wide lanes) was recommended for aesthetic reasons; City Engineer prefers a 32' wide single driveway acceas. Miller eaid he feels 32' is wider than necessary for the anticipated traffic; noted this access ie also the existing service access to Sutton Place; noted that either would no doubt be acceptable to the Fire Chief. Mulcahy moved, seconded by Hicke, to table the motion. Motion carried unanimously (5-0). . North End Neighborhood Concerns Mr. Ed Reid reported that he met with some of the Sandeen Road residents; was surprised at what they actually see looking across to the Presbyterian Homes property; noted he was not aware of how this area wae viewed prior to his recent on-site meetings. Reid explained that a service area has been created; trucks and buses are parked there, semi-trucks enter here and deliver perishables to the lake side of the main building (kitchens); area is also used to park about 20 cars. Reid said he proposee to construct a 6'-8' high berm which, when planted, will provide a acreen from a portion of the parking and storage area, and also cut the noiee for the neighbors. Reid said they basically have agreed with this solution. Reid said he can- not hide the access area, but propos~evergreen planting on a 4'- 5'berm to help buffer the view and the sound of air conditioner. Reid said the delivery system to the lake side of the resident building has been discussed with our board; appears it can be re- duced, but do not know if they can be eliminated entirely. -7- . Minutes of Regular Council Meeting January 11, 1983 Page Eight Guest said the lake side of the reeidence building was originally planned to be all grass; all deliveries were to be made to the other building at the underground service area; said it is incon- ceivable to him why deliveries of any kind are needed to the lake- side building; it's noisy and the whole point was to put this underground; it was a part of the original building permit approv- al; would like Council to require the elimination of this delivery area at the lake side building. Reid said the area where the 3 buses and our tractor are parked will be screened; noted there are 3 to 5 cars of handicapped employees that park daily in this lakeside parking area also, plus the mail delivery employee's car. Reid said all other parking can be eliminated from this area. . Mr. Guest said he feels a new attitude of cooperation to resolve their problems; noted that another problem is the intensity of trucking; is concerned re the possibility of centralized shipping and receiving for off-site facilities (e.g. Johanna Middle School site); wants this site limited to service for this site only; would like this included in the Special Use Permit. It wae noted that the fire department requested the lake side drive area to remain for use as a fire lane. Hagstrom noted that the City aleo usee this area for parking when eervicing the lift station; has no problem with occasional truck accese to the lift station as they do now when it is necessary. Hans Lagerstrom, Sandeen Road, asked why City bothers to post Sandeen Road in the spring; trucks come in On it anyway. Miller noted that whether or not the existing Special Use Permits are amended for the cluster multiple housing proposal, they can be adjusted to cover additional landscaping and parking require- ments. Resolution No. 83-6, Authorizing the Joint and Cooperative Agree- ment for Administration of a Cable Communication System McNiesh reported that there is apparently no problem with Council's recommevdation to clarify the wording (Section 10, page 6) ineert- ing "shall cause" audit to be made; noted that Bauer explained that the recommendation to include the requirement to operate within the budget, would probably necessitate returning the agree- ment to all the franchise cities for approval. Hicks moved, seconded by McAllister, thst Council adopt Resolution No. 83-6, with the chsnges as outlined (Section 10, page 6). Motion carried unsnimously (5-0). Approval of Finsl Pavment and Accept Improvements: A. No. P 80-1, County Rd. E Street Lighting, People's Elect. B. No. ST 81-2, Storm Drainage, LaMetti & Sons. Hicks moved, seconded by McAllister, that Council approve the final ~ payments to People's Electric (No. P. 80-1) and LsMetti & Sons (No. ST 81-2) and accept the County Rd. E Street Lighting and Storm Drainage Improvements. Motion carried unanimously (5-0). OTHER BUSINESS Karth Lake Meeting with Residents McNiesh reported that Walt Fowler, Ramsey County Sheriff's Office, ie scheduled to meet with Karth Lake area residents at 7:30 p.m. at the Village Hall on Thursday, January 27th. Hicks will attend the meeting which was requested by Mrs. Einan. Edgewood Community Center Meeting McAllister will attend the meeting which she reported will be con- ducted by Mounds View School District. -8- . . . . Minutes of Regular Council Meeting ,January 11, 1983 Page Nine Parks and Recreation Meeting Woodburn will attend the January meeting in place of Mulcahy who will be out of town. REPORT OF CLERK ADMINISTRATOR CHARLOTTE MC NIESH Resolution No. 83-7, Resolution Relating to Apportionment of Aseesements Relating to Water 68-3 (Kulman/Bussard/Carlson) McAllister moved, eeconded by Hicks, that Council adopt Resolution No. 83-7. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0). Street Lights - T.H. 51 and Snelling Council was referred to Johansen's memo of 1-10-83 an~ concurred to accept the proposal as outlined in memo. Approval of 1983 Licenses and Permits Hicks moved, seconded by McAllister, that Council approve the 1983 licenses and permits as listed, subject to approval of the Rubbish Hauler licenses by the City Health Officer. Motion carried uuan- imously (5-0). . Claima and Payroll McNiesh preaented two claims for approval of payment, in addition to the liet eubmitted: -Lametti & Sons - $16,902.74 -PERA 947.28 McAllister moved, seconded by Hicks, that Council approve the Claims and Payroll includiug the two additional checks. Motion carried unanimously (5-0). Adjournment Hicks moved, seconded by McAllister, that the meeting adjourn at 1:15 a.m. Motion carried unanimsouly (5-0). ~7/i:wJii)~ Charlotte McNiesh Clerk Administrator ..~ AA / t/.~ UNrr!0l~~- Robert L. Woodburn Mayor Notice of Meet~n~ [ ADDENDUM Minutes of Regular Councl I Meeting January II, 1983 State Le~lslative Action Survey - Lea~ue of Minnesota Cities Councl I was referred to Proposed 1983 City Policies and to State Legislative Action Survey. After review, and discussion, Counci I concurred that the following five proposed policies be selected as being of the highest priority for the City of Arden Hills: Revenue Sources RS-I Levy limits RS-2 Adequate Funding for Local Government Aid RS-S Local Government Aid Formula RS-7 Homestead Credit Land Use, Environment, Ener~y and Transportation LUEE-3 Manufactured Housing 1 . , 1983 LICENSE APPLICATIONS PENDING - NEED COUNCIL APPROVAL All Star Video 3151 Lake Johanna Blvd. Arden Hilla Club 4177 Fernwood Ave. Arden Hills Nursery 4350 N. Hamline . Arden Hills Opticians Inc. 3539 Lexington Ave. No. Arden Plaza Pharmacy 3533 Lexington Ave. NO. Bethel College 3900 Bethel Dr. Bethel Seminary 3949 Bethel Dr. Blue Fox Inn 3833 N. Lexington Bohemian Cue Service 1660 West Hwy. 96 Brighton Excavating 1920 Hwy. 96 Carolyn's Cards & Gifts 3539 No. Lexington Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. 4100 No. Hamline Ave. Coas t to Coas t 3547 No. Lexington Ave. Carroll's Fine Furniture Inc. 1203 W. County Rd. E Control Data 4201 N. Lexington Ave. Flaherty's Golf Tees 1200 W. County Rd. E Flaherty'e Arden Bowl 1273 W..Co. Rd. E . Hauser's Super Valu 3527 Lexington Ave. No. Land O'Lakes 4001 Lexington Ave. Lindey's Inc. 3610 No. Snelling Ave. McDonald's 1313 West Co. Rd. E Retail Sales Restaurant 2 Game Machines Jukebox 16 Courts Retail Salee Retail Sales Cigarette Sales Retail Sales Restaurant Res tauran t Reetaurant Restaurant Game Machine Jukebox Retail Sales Retail Sales Retail Sales Restaurant Retail Sales Retail Sales Reetaurant Driving Range Restaurant 36 Bowling Lanes 37 Mechanical Amuse. 8 Billiard Tables 1 Jukebox Grocery Off-sale malt liquor Res tauran t Res tauran t Cigarette Sales Restaurant $25.00 $50.00 $40.00 ea. $15.00 $160.00 $25.00 $25.00 $12.00 $25.00 $75.00 100.00 $25.00 $25.00 $40.00 $15.00 $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 $75.00 $25.00 $25.00 $ 75.00 $100.00 $25.00 $15.00 ea. Dev. $40.00 ea. $15.00 $15.00 lane $183.00 15.00 $125.00 $25.00 12.00 $25.00 . ~. , 1983 LICENSE APPLICATIONS Page Two McGuire's Inn 1201 W. Co. Rd. E Minneapolis Hide & Tallow Co. P.O. Box 12547 . Mischke Equipment 3757 No. Dunlap Mutual Service Insurance Two Pine Tree Dr. Northridge Emerald Inn 1125 Red Fox Rd. Northwestern College 3003 Snelling Ave. No. O'Donnell's Cleaners 3541 N. Lexington Ave. Pizza Hut 3551 No. Lexington St. Paul Book & Stationery 1233 W. County Rd. E Shaw Lumber Co. 3776 Connelly Ave. Standard Service Station 1306 WestCo. Rd. E Steak Inn 1310 Weat Co. Rd. E G.M. Stewart Lumber Co. 4797 Hwy. 10 Stephens Art & Frame 3565 No. Lexington Sundry Shop 4201 N. Lexington Tasha's Treasures 3151 Lk. Johanna Blvd. . Town Crier 3855 N. Lexington Ave. Video Shoppe, Inc. 3555 No. Lexington Ave. Restaurant Jukeb ox 2 Mechanical Amuse. Dec. 3 Video Machines Ho tel/Motel Rendering Plant Retail Sales Restaurant Hotel/Motel 65 rooms Restaurant Dry Cleaning Restaurant Video Game Retail Salee Retail Salee 6 Pumps Res tauran t Retail Sales Retail Sales Retail Sales Cigarette Sales Retail Salee Reetaurant Re tail Sales $7 5.00 15.00 40.00 ea. 40.00 ea. 770.00 $300.00 $25.00 $125.00 $325 .00 $50.00 $25.00 $25.00 40.00 $25.00 $25.00 $130.00 $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 12.00 $25.00 $50.00 $25.00 . . . RUBBISH HAULER'S LICENSES REQUESTED Ace Solid Waste Mgmt. Inc. 3118 - 162nd Lane N.W. Gallagher's Service Inc. 1691 - 91st Ave. N.E. Guy's Disposal R.R. 1 Box 26 O.W. Manthei & Sons 2624 - 14th Ave. So. Walter's Disposal 2830 101st Ave. N.E. Woodlake Sanitary 3800 Reetwood Rd. Poor Richard's Inc. P.O. Box 7022 W.D. Gray 1036 w. Central Ave. Troje's Sanitation P.O. Box 609 FOR 1983 Residential $6.50/mo.- $8.50/mo. Commerical Various Townh ouses $3.00/unit Residential $72. 00 /yr. Commerical 1 yd l/week $21.00 Residential $8.00/mo. Commercial Varies Residential $23.70/qtly. Commercial Varies Residential $6.50/mo. Dup lex $12.00/mo. Fourplex $17.00/mo. Senior Citizens 4.75/mo. Residential $7.00/mo. "'" . t. BOARD UF APPi:A!5 Ma-;~rl:i-'~(f;~;;ga'r:t;--"C-'e: 1 j ea!"l LEnil{H~ ('9 !~ c!lc u Stp'arJe . '"~ r: <, ".F "'11., :,..i ""'" J'IL ,. _ T m T~~!gg~!e CABLE CO!~H.HJN ell i en: (.: '-j^~l.: ~D V .i..~;Qf':.~~,c'2?}-1r'~.J."~f:. VI r : ij i am baue)", ;....~Jn Ken Fi;"CS,:: l d ,joG:i at' ,joh~'\';or Ma 'y An n U ;Hlb 6' Ei;a~'n€1 r.teG !ii \' ;') k/c:f":-e-n M'f ch,i3[1 i Rogo i MOB- ~~~::(3 ,;oe No Th C;V L DeFENSE Rob-e-;;=f--1fic,C)t:!b ;' ";~r',~ -.i;i' E~! A~ S~hmaeG0ko SOSi-~'i~{y L~!'i;i.P.F J ~'m S t- i;'" ,~~' ~I ,>: ~~~, C h (] t.a ';'Y fx- ck.,:;c,ri .., oh ri H't~' M (en [,1<:) i ~~ac.hcn eb Ed M~il:~e Chuck Mur~Gnso.(tt' K,:;..:-;.'ll \;:1;;'l"i Rauenhc' ~}-{ c:~ I r~lJ_nc~qu ~si' BOb Sr~nnf)k u~e Sh; t.'-!,~ :f~ i-:, $. h van ,t,li d 1-"6\" !'Jo f HUr'~r.N H GH'i~) "~"~,".,""_...,,w~~.., ,'_~_'_,'",,~ , ,.._ f;\nrt ;<:;:ii'i~~:'I':::~ ,C,; <:1 t\, ;'t;1' n f'ci~ r~2.f) (i ( i-'i ~:~:,'j ~ n" ;:.1 un j;:f}il1E:; ;' I.:;., i,J;F' 'IinG\'!:.. ~;t)!~r' \.) ~;,<';.'L fn ):. S. '-~ h,3' v: to:' i.;~' ',..; i:~ :; - Ci "; i ~;-'J' .4~'\ic;r-'(l ,3U:I.b,~ i-':, \." :7;':"~:' 6 ,1u, ".f) t,:;'~. 1:; J: 09 'JEWS, ~ ';ii Cf i:~ f;, :,J I,,~) ",'./,,;' '~ ,,~ "':0 ,re. ~.~; i -, !'i ,::;: ~ \." 't,:;:: '.:~ ('.:t ". ';' J ~ ~ :"'l E ':;~ ;~_;- :~ (c: t :~; c' l, r>~ n l,: ,;;-:::0 "~: i'l: ~ :::.~ n :~ii'a Q ;,!ooy i':) iud':J0 l-Ls j ~n ~; :)!,; i: .;h~ 'S:.:'aS,:,~i-:".l;' i:: ',:> .:". ,3 I' " . 1"',"1 ::; ::~> 9'~/'. ~)j l:~ [,9 >'" j 9 :; i q '}:., i 'J3 " ,. ':-.ri ;;E C' ~.; h:;>OL='i~ H ,: " i,.-.i ",~,;:;), r flPF'O h 'rHr,!\~';,:, ~~~;:;~ ~~~~-'; ;,:~;-r~~,~-ti,t~~ .:_: L,ON t.,;n : c, 1,<, d,o.- "" Mo ,;-y O;~, rOo:J~,'l':(:.1 f':e: n n 17.; -j: b ~~: c'~, .~) Gi3 :'c d \,: ':::.')1' I 'j r: :;: J a:3r. G ;'J;';:; L1 ck f\ DOd I:' (-.: Ko:':'~ ~ '? ;:~ [;;'::k r:'e (J'>j L ;:) pB' / 't .4. i: an j~k~1l ;>SC"k~l ,; k~ Ott.o {'O';l 5,'S t;'u:~ ,;' iiI 'I ~J g!_~ : ,3 t.~ L '~~: !': l d cLJ" >j2!,-:0:ig ._(~ ~~~~~,~. .,.,;)..~. I!. (~~. .J(,;,::nnc;; H:i ':-1 il(,tt~~. l Ch~:j f,'" ,;';St; BJOt1;:;'()('rJ (~,c)~: e ~'T (; 'r Ii ~~. ~;;a- I ;-- 'i ',1 G \'-- c~':) it ji,e rr"y j OJ sore 0&' s:,., !.tc{,i')!i:' Gt::; ;":';;~iJ ;i'y I",;::; "y I;' 'Iii C(; :, c;.~ Gfj i: Y n'tC-~:'n fl.'Jr."] !Iy D;:~jhiin;:;:r i,$"; ':, iGi\"'nafa f)~rH,:,~ 'I \e; 21 .....,:' l'p ;:-;-,:'G C:~,e 'i 1"" N~~nt':' H.~~n:'Si'.'~n, 'f'!CS l;h3iit: 'r f', ~", :3 ': fi i~' t: ;. :.,: "'~ '.""" :;..-, :~ >,' !i~ ,:.; -,/ f'!;) ,C' '.,) Ii n,i(lf" H{)i: ~'~n i,i .~. ,:), !' t_ ;';:J \:.:;:$!i,'~);i ~<U()'i' ::::idt~ .} c:.~ r i'l; ni ::-;U~:' i ':1 \:,1 (;i-' .,.-, /.'J::bi . . . , ~:; ~".:;l 'i ::;, ;.~; 1, n \; .::' ,::{:':I;:-, :' ~i! jt::).-- ! -,~:' (-. Li'.: ::; (t(., ;..-O:t ~, '_it.. !.' ".:.' "', ,.-~ ,/ I: ""r:1 C-If :";Ci'; '"i' i-E .. . . t I t I I I 1 I I I . , 'I I I ., I I I I I I I I I I 'I I I I I , I I I I I I I . I I I 00000 0000 00000-0000 .....~.... '"1t'\~QO<<lo&t\OO .........00 01-\0 on <<I _____."'ONCI' I 4o.... ). ~ooooooo .... 0 0 0 0 00 0 - C............a o '" In In '" U'\o 0 . %..........NNO 001 poI"j - - - - -- - . COLwt I 0\01 _0.. w -' :) .0 w :J: U '" ..<:0 ...0 r:: . oon %.... ... CDL_ 0\ 01 t _.G..' I 1 I 1 1 , 1 . . 1 1 , "" c:: < -' '" , 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 I t r:: t I .. I I '" 1 I C I .. LI c- 1;1 '-.... .... >- ~Vl .,,~ "- .0- - ta lD ~\.. -U.a"O o..<:..--E" O(,J -"< ~ '" 0 ]I: UU%-'L --% ..<: .... GI% "'." U ...tI. ora-en all ~ to 'e E 10 4U-"OC" 0- ..-J:: 0::1 0:%00~0'" w % < Z z o ~ II> o 0.. cec&: lIl:IlatVtG'- EEEiE<DL ----.... ---- ::II.... I.UUUU &It~ QCC:CC ... >:r23~ au "OOOOL. %(,J(,J(,J(,J~", 000 000 . . . "''''0 ON" -"'0 1---- I I I 1 , I I I , , I lO_ . I I I I I I I I I I , . I I I t I I I 1 . . ..<: I , .Ift I C I CD I . I 1 '" 1 % c u>eE %.~..<: -0" 4)~~N- ...U ~ 2 ..,.. OalZ~ ... L.l:"O 4-'=CI. ..<:0..0 (,J~:J:Q L .. L U C :. o ... :. . L- 04 ... eo .. ...'" o .... ... ..... u -... . r:: .... -a -LIE Q 0.... "'c- r::- U ... 0 ,. 0>- O-I.c:..c .......- ..a.C> L.::I 0 .... ..en N ~ "'U .... _...ae IQ r::o:~"'- L.- E,,"O-- ...r:::a(,J> <e U >.. ~..-...~ ~.JC-2- . ....Q a.Q. -.::1. uo..o..O. ... o ... ... ... ~~OO"'~"'''''''''''''OO''''''OOO ~o~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o .. . . ... . .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .'.. %~~~InN-----~~~~~~~ ------ -- L a I I I a.. I I I . I , I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I , I I 1 I I t I I I I I I I I I I .1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' I L OO~~NNNNNOOOOO~O ~~N~.~____-~~NN~~N 0................. %~~~~------~~~~~~~ o N o ... . ------ I . I' . It I'" I' . · I I L ...... · '" I . . . I I . , f I . . I . I I , I . . . I . I , I , . I I I I I f I I . I I I I . t I I I I I I I I , . I I I I . I I , t I . .. " ,I . GJ I I . I ,.......,,.. 1.::tIt.. . GII~I.a lUll .~.C18''''.c Ie 0 ...c~cc.~u- .~ leo"'-='-O~ E -E~- .~.~~~I~~~ ~ ~~~~ LLeUaJ u-cc:c:a .:1:--0 ~OGlS:E V"'O-CON-CU:J C ->>- G 4>> :s ~ 0 a . ~:c 0.. >- r:: . - c .. :a "" '" < ... . 0 >0: . . - r:: 0 a:I ... ..-GIG ftlCiDG.c "0"'''''= .C~L~~~~G->~~-~~- cc--u Guaca~~>u~> .O.~-.L-:J~~.~~~-~.~ ~c>~z<<~%WC"'~~O~~~ o U c: ... lO > r:: r:: ... co.. .... v of- ... E = c .e"'UlIltIlll"'+- ... ,",L..:lC.:.t~.:lC.:Jt:"" 1'0 CD '- Uo............. :EUO O"-OOooo~ U VI JI:'~~lI" CI .:tt....- Cl oc ..~... .c:uuuuu rao~'-' G------ ...1:11""0.. 00 ....~___-_._~ G: +- . ~L~DD~~~-L~U+-U .. -O:l:J:I~~ .:11111 C~ . E]I:~~~o..o..o..a:lo..L"O~ IE 0 L E '" (.)...... 0 vt .. .. .. .. .. .. . ..~ lD G II: ....U.:tl..I8G4Ia)Q)CUlDUr.nU- Of-- LUUUUUUUUO .. C4A.QC~CCcc~e~>o~ ->,...e~I1I~~~~~~~~+--~ ~~~_ cccr::r::r::r::c:r::-c. . C. ...u...o.~...~-r::...U at 2~~'-~""~+-~+-+-'" 2 - . 4L~~_=CCC~~CCG.GV . U.....~--------..E~C U-_lO=lOlOlOlOlOlOlOlOLOOlO <UUo..o..%:E:E:E:E:E:E:E~(,JY'" Z .----. .-1'