Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 07-08-1996 I I. I I I I I I I . I I I I I I ~. I I MINUTES CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING JULY 8,1996 7:30 P.M. - NEW BRIGHTON COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Dennis Probst called to order the regular City Council meeting at 7:31 p,m. Present: Mayor Dennis Probst, Councilmembers Beverly Aplikowski, Dale Hicks, and Paul Malone. Absent: Councilmember Susan Keirn. Also present were: City Administrator, Brian Fritsinger; City Accountant, Terry Post; Public Works Superintendent, Dwayne Stafford; Community Development Director, Kevin Ringwald; Parks & Recreation Director, Cindy Walsh; and Recording Secretary, Carla Wirth. ADOPT AGENDA MOTION: Aplikowski moved and Hicks seconded a motion to adopt the agenda for the July 8, 1996, Regular City Council meeting as presented. The motion carried unanimously (4-0). APPROVAL OF MINUTES June 10, 1996, Regular Council Meeting Page 10, seventh paragraph, second line: "She advised she is planning to go to Rochester and that this event is well attended by New Brighton representatives so she hopes to be joined by others from Arden Hills." June 24, 1996, Regular Council Meeting No corrections. I I. I I I I I I I .. I I I I I I ~. I I ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JULY 8. 1996 2 MOTION: Malone moved and Aplikowski seconded a motion to approve the June 10, 1996, Regular Council Meeting minutes as corrected and the June 24, 1996, Regular Council Meeting minutes as presented. The motion carried unanimously (4-0). CONSENT CALENDAR A. Claims and Payroll MOTION: Malone moved and Hicks seconded a motion to approve the Consent Calendar as presented, and authorize execution of all necessary documents contained therein. The motion carried unanimously (4-0). PUBLIC COMMENTS Mayor Probst invited the audience to address the Council on any issue not already on the agenda. Gene Schmidt, 1628 Chatham Avenue, distributed information regarding a layout of his property, a letter from the City Administrator, and assessments levied for each property benefitting by the improvement. He first addressed the layout of the land and noted the amount of extensive improvements which were made with respect to drainage and curb work. However, his property received none of these improvements yet is proposed to be assessed higher than any other property in the development for this particular improvement. He stated when he first purchased this lot, he did not have to pay an "up charge" since he had to deal with traffic on the corner lot. Yet, the assessments are calculated on the assumption that the improvements will increase the value of his property which is opposite of what he was told when he purchased this corner lot. Mr. Schmidt stated his opinion that the proposed assessment is not fair. He requested the Council to comment on whether it can make a determination to reduce the assessment or if he will have to follow the appeal process tomorrow. Mr, Schmidt noted that when Chatham Avenue improvements were made in 1991, McCracken Lane was not improved due to a budget shortfall and it was not scheduled the following year either. Mayor Probst stated it is within the Council's purview to make findings but the Council did previously act to deny this appeal based on the rationale that Mr. Schmidt's property is being treated similar to other properties and there was no differentiating issues. Mr. Schmidt stated he accepted this until he observed what had developed (no drainage improvements to his property). I I. I I I I I I I .. I I I I I I ~. I I ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JULY 8. 1996 3 Councilmember Hicks asked which neighbor was not being assessed. Mr. Schmidt pointed out the property which is directly across from his lot in the area of the overlay. Councilmember Hicks inquired what the blue colored lines represented on the map. Mr. Schmidt stated they indicated the alignment of the storm sewer drain tile. He then reviewed the current drainage problems which this will correct Councilmember Hicks asked if curb and gutter are in front of Mr. Schmidt's property. Mr. Schmidt explained the project only included spot repairs to the curb and gutter in locations needed to correct problems and all but three properties have had some spot curb improvements. Councilmember Malone reviewed that this project is to recycle the roadway, not totally rebuild it, with repair/improvement to curb, gutter, and drainage, to be done where needed. Mr. Schmidt stated residents were told the cost to be assessed would be based on soil borings and this was done. Councilmember Aplikowski questioned the area of the street which is being recycled. Mr. Schmidt reviewed the area involved and pointed out his existing driveway access is on Chatham A venue, not McCracken Lane. Mayor Probst advised the options before the Council are to consider the appeal, reject the appeal, or make an adjustment. He explained when the assessment rate was established, it was not known where the areas of corrections would be needed and the street is proposed to be assessed based on front footage. Mayor Probst stated at this point, he sees no rationale to consider an adjustment. He then reviewed the process used to arrive at front footage and the City's assessment policy for drainage improvements, Council member Hicks asked what Mr. Schmidt believes is fair. Mr. Schmidt stated his property is not the largest sized but he is being assessed the highest amount. Councilmember Hicks pointed out the property is a corner lot and probably has the largest amount of footage on McCracken Lane. Mr. Schmidt stated he is not interested in making an appeal and noted the Mayor and Councilmembers are also property owners and understand "what is fair". He asserted the assessment calculations and formulas are not always fair and requested it be deviated from in this case. Mr. Schmidt suggested the assessment be divided equally among the eleven properties. Then, his property would be assessed the average of $1 ,675 which would still result in his property being assessed among those properties with the highest assessments. COlmcilmember Hicks pointed out that to deviate from the standard formula as Mr. Schmidt is suggesting, three other properties would be slightly above $1,600. I I. I I I I I I I .. I I I I I I ~. I I ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JUL Y 8. 1996 4 Councilmember Malone stated he appreciates Mr. Schmidt's argument but the Council represents the residents as well, including having to pay for assessments themselves. He noted the trade-off if Mr. Schmidt's assessment is reduced, is that the money will have to come from other tax payers to make up the difference. Councilmember Malone agreed there is no perfect way to calculate assessments but the policy is to assess on a per front footage basis and try to be as fair as possible. However, this does not mean the assessments will be equal. He noted that assessments calculated on a square footage basis would probably result in a similar situation. Councilmember Malone pointed out the Council tries to be careful to use the assessment policy uniformly and only make adjustments if property cannot be built upon for some reason. Generally, adjustments are not made for other reasons and undeveloped land is not the case with Mr. Schmidt's property. Councilmember Malone stated the City has done the best job possible in looking at the interests of all parties and he believes the proposed assessment is as reasonably appropriate as possible. Also, if the Council were to make an arbitrary adjustment, it may establish a precedent for others to request an adjustment. Councilmember Malone clarified that drainage improvements are designed and constructed to benefit all property regardless of the location of the actual drain. Mr. Schmidt stated no one else will be able to appeal because the deadline is tomorrow. Councilmember Malone reiterated the need to find a solid basis in order to consider an adjustment and stated he does not find that rationale with Mr. Schmidt's property. Mayor Probst inquired regarding the status of other appeals. Brian Fritsinger, City Administrator, advised that one has been received but none on this recycling improvement. Mayor Probst noted if there had been no drainage problem to correct, McCracken Lane could have been extended to the east property line and recycled from that point forward. But, this was not possible due to the need for drainage work. Since the recycling was necessary to install the drain tile, Mayor Probst suggested this may be the basis to consider an adjustment. Also, the amount of adjustment being requested is less than the City cost to become involved in the appeal process. Councilmember Aplikowski noted the difference is $557. She stated that in principal she agrees with Councilmember Malone, that streets need to be assessed according to the assessment policy. However, she is open to consideration since Mr, Schmidt's driveway is not on that front footage. Council member Aplikowski stated she is not prepared to make a decision on $557 but is willing to discuss possibly one-half of that amount. Mayor Probst agreed the Council meeting tonight is not the proper forum to play "lets make a deal" due to concern of precedent of future adjustments, but there are some issues which may make a case for some modification. I I. I I I I I I I .. I I I I I I ~. I I ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JULY 8. 1996 5 Councilmember Hicks noted McCracken Lane is not being resurfaced all the way to Chatham A venue and suggested staff be asked to present a recommendation at the next meeting. He stated that while he is sympathetic to Mr. Schmidt's request, the Council is in a position where it can no longer adjust other assessments to cover the adjustment being requested by Mr. Schmidt. Mr. Fritsinger advised the assessment policy has been consistently applied with other comer lots for a number of years. The assessment for Mr. Schmidt's property is based on this policy and any change would be not consistent with the policy. If the Council desires to revisit this issue, he suggested they consider a specific motion. Mr. Fritsinger noted a special meeting has been scheduled on July 15, 1996, and this request for adjustment could be considered at that time. Also, the Council could extend Mr. Schmidt's appeal date for one week so it can be considered at that time. MOTION: Aplikowski moved and Hicks seconded a motion to table consideration ofMr. Schmidt's request for an assessment adjustment to the special Council meeting of July 15, 1996 and to extend Mr. Schmidt's appeal deadline to July 17, 1996. Council member Malone stated he would support the motion on the floor to allow further discussion. The motion carried unanimously (4-0), There were no other public comments, UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS A. Planning Case #96-05, Control Data PUD, 4201 North Lexington Avenue Kevin Ringwald, Community Development Director, advised that Control Data Systems (CDS) is requesting approval of a PUD Master Plan and a Preliminary Minor Subdivision to facilitate the potential sale of the building and property adjacent to 4290 Lexington Avenue (originally the DynaMark building). Mr. Ringwald reviewed a site plan of the property and commented on stafl's review of each of the three parcels relating to building and parking areas. Mr. Ringwald provided more detail regarding Area 1 and reviewed the Parks and Recreation Commission recommendation for continued use of the parking area so it is in close proximity to Cummings Park. They also recommend the dedication of the westerly 100 feet of the wooded area. Staff recommends they be allowed to develop up to the easterly 25 feet of the wooded lot which is 200 feet wide, but that a 25 to 50 foot setback would only be acceptable with review to assure adequate low level screening and buffering. I .. I I I I I I I .. I I I I I I I. I I ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JULY 8.1996 6 It was noted the Planning Commission unanimously recommends approval of the variance requcsts with the following conditions: L Land Uses allowed by this PUD shall be those land uses described in the applicant's land use chart (Exhibit A, page 3 of 21). Except, that the percentage to which the existing land uses currently exist on the site shall be adhered to or provisions are made for additional parking; 2. Lot Coverage shall be a maximum of30 percent and Parcels A-I and C maybe viewed jointly in determining the lot coverage; 3. Floor Area Ratio shall be a maximum of 0.6 and Parcels A-I and C may be viewed jointly in determining the floor area ratio; 4. Landscape Lot Area shall be 25 percent for Parcels A-I and C and 35 percent for Parcel A-2. Also, the three Key Landscape Elements as described by Exhibit A, page 21 of21, shall be protected from disturbance; 5. Parking for Parcels A-I and C shall be determined to have a current surplus of 171 parking spaces and Parcel A-2 shall be determined to have a current surplus of 41 parking spaces. Also, the row of parking stalls adjacent to Femwood Avenue shall be eliminated and replaced with landscaping prior to any further site plan approvals are granted on Parcels A-lor C. The landscaping is to be reviewed by the Planning Commission and consideration for approval by the City CounciL The landscaping shall receive approval by the City; 6, Park dedication for land shall be granted and/or fees in lieu of dedication shall be determined by the City Council after consideration and recommendation by the Parks and Recreation Committee; 7. Signage along Lexington Avenue shall be limited to the current level of signage, all other signage shall be governed by the requirements ofthe Sign Code; 8. Architectural Design shall be consistent with the applicants description on Exhibit A, page 5 of 21 and the requirements of the City Code, whichever is greater; 9. Skyway from the CDS campus (southwest part) and the CPI campus is acceptable, subject to City review and approval of the construction, aesthetics, and distribution of liabilities ofthe skyway; 10. Utilities shall be governed by the rules and regulations applicable at the time of review; I I. I I I I I I I .. I I I I I I ~. I I ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JULY 8. 1996 7 II, The East-West private street between Parcels A-I and B should not be dedicated as a public street (collector); and 12. Parcel B shall be analyzed by itself in relationship to the land development parameters and that those parameters shall not be flexed from what the City Code allows. The Planning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary minor subdivision, subject to the following conditions: I. Provision of the necessary drainage and utility easements, prior to Planning Commission consideration of the final minor subdivision; 2. Provision of the necessary vehicular cross access easements, prior to Planning Commission consideration of the final minor subdivision; and 3. Dedication and/or payment of the appropriate park dedication for Parcels A-2 and B, as determined by City Council. Mr. Ringwald noted that the City Code requires a 4/5 vote of the Council to approve a PUD master plan. Mayor Probst asked ifthe applicant accepts the proposed conditions. Walt Seiler, representing CDS, stated they agree with all conditions except one, the 25 to 50 foot setback requirement into the wooded area (Area #1). Mayor Probst questioned the zero lot line building setback between Parcels A-I and C and stated his concern that if these parcels were significantly redeveloped, the City would not want to guarantee the zero lot line option, Mr. Ringwald advised the lot line being questioned exists as shown. He eXplained that if the building on Parcels A-I and C were destroyed and rebuilt, it would probably be assumed that the current lot line conditions would again be acceptable, if the buildings were rebuilt as they currently exist. Mayor Probst stated if this were to happen, he would support requiring tlle new development to provide building setback adjacent to the common lot line, Mr. Ringwald advised this aspect was not discussed with the applicant but if the building were to be redeveloped, then he believes the owner would request a modification to the PUD. Mayor Probst requested assurances that the action being considered tonight would not prevent that from happening should the entire site be redeveloped. Mr. Ringwald suggested that if the council wishes assurances, then Condition 13 should be added to indicate this intention. I .. I I I I I I I .. I I I I I I I. I I ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JULY 8. 1996 8 Councilmember Malone stated the PUD concept is to develop multiple lots but if it were to happen that the lots break into separate ownership, there is nothing to dissolve the PUD. He stated if Parcel C comes under separate ownership, he believes the PUD should become invalid. Mr. Ringwald advised the PUD does not relate to specific ownership but, rather, is a legal document which permanently links the parcels due to access and other needs. Mayor Probst noted Parcel C already has separate access to Fernwood Avenue and he wants to assure his concern is addressed. Mr. Seiler reviewed the history of ownership of this site and advised that CDS owns the property and leases it back; however, the owner of Parcel C has the option to buy the property in the year 2018. Councilmember Aplikowski suggested a condition be added that if the building is removed, for whatever reason, the zero lot line would not exist and the PUD would dissolve. Mr. Fritsinger advised that since a PUD is very similar to a SUP in that it is filed with the property and runs with the land, a special condition would be required to deal with this aspect. Jeff Smyser, RLK Associates, Ltd., representing CDS, commented on the differences between the current use and a future PUD use. Mr. Seiler indicated no objection to the type of condition being suggested by Mayor Probst. Bill Franke, 1228 Wynridge Drive, stated he is an abutting property owner. He noted that approval of the proposed PUD would be similar to establishing a zoning district and also it approves the zero lot line as it exists today. He cautioned against consideration whereby demolition of the building would dissolve the PUD since it would also eliminate the certainty of what will exist on this property, Mr. Franke noted another consideration is the need to construct buildings that are financeable and insurable. Mayor Probst stated while he is not opposed to what exists, he does not want to guarantee the zero setback should the entire area be redeveloped. I .. I I I I I I I .. I I I I I I ~. I I ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL. JULY 8. 1996 9 Councilmember Hicks noted the zero lot line was established by a previous action and he does not understand how action under this application impacts that situation. He questioned staffs recommendation regarding the setbacks from the 100 foot park dedication line on the west side of the site. Mr. Ringwald explained staffs recommendation is zero to 25 feet is an acceptable intrusion into Area I and 25 feet to 50 feet, it should first be reviewed by the City. He commented on the zoning districts in relationship to the property to be dedicated to the City which is currently zoned Industrial. I. He stated it is not unreasonable to require additional setback to assure adequate buffering between single family residential and 1.1 uses, It was noted that another PUD amendment could be considered once a solid proposal is submitted which addresses the City's concern. Councilmember Aplikowski asked if the applicant is against the 25 foot restriction. Mr. Seiler explained that CDS is interested in dividing and selling this site and wants to retain flexibility to add a building to the property. He noted that adding a building with a 25,000 square footprint would necessitate additional parking spaces. Rather than establishing pre-existing conditions, CDS wants flexibility to utilize the site up to the 125 foot setback line. Mr. Ringwald advised the City would be in a better position if the Planning Commission and staff recommendation is considered which leaves the decision to allow further intrusions into Area I with the City rather than with the developer. MOTION: Hicks moved and Malone seconded a motion to approve Planning Case #96-05, Control Data Systems, PUD Master Planl420l North Lexington Avenue, based on the conditions outlined by the Planning Commission and adding Condition #13, related to zero lot line ifthe buildings on Parcels C and A are destroyed, and Condition #14, resolving the setback line from the park dedication line. Councilmember Malone asked if the motion suggests a 25 foot setback line from the 200 foot mark and a 50 foot setback considered with City review. Councilmember Hicks indicated support of a 25 foot setback from the park dedication line. With regard to the zero lot line, Councilmember Malone suggested the current zero lot line is not an independent right of the PUD but would require review as part of any significant PUD amendment. He stated he cannot support the motion on the floor since it only requires a 25 foot setback from the park dedication line. Mr. Franke provided a detailed explanation of site amenities and expressed his concern with regard to the applicants requested setback since it would "erase" a great portion of the wooded area and is not responsible planning. Mr. Franke noted that staff's recommendation was actually a compromise and while he agrees with the need for flexibility to support development, he believes staff's recommendation does just that. I .. I I I I I I I .. I I I I I I ~. I I ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JULY 8 1996 10 Mr. Seiler stated his point in suggesting a 125 foot setback is not that a developer would tear down the wooded area, but to eliminate restricting a future development. He reviewed current restrictions related to parking spaces and the potential that exists where additional parking spaces would need to be created. He suggested the area of the 25 foot "overlap" could also be used to provide additional landscaping. Mr. Seiler reiterated that CDS prefers to retain flexibility and suggested the actual setback be considered at the time the site plan is submitted for consideration. Councilmember Malone stated he understands Mr. Seiler's request but expressed concern with the need to protect the City's best interest in case the developer is not as sensitive to these issue as CDS. Mr. Seiler suggested a compromise to consider 25 feet with up to 75 feet under review (rather than 50 feet). Mayor Probst concurred with Councilmember Malone's comments and stated he does not support the motion on the floor since it does not provide adequate protection ofthe wooded area and setback from the residential area. Councilmember Hicks withdrew his motion on the floor. He noted that a site plan review will be needed with any development and different parking options could be considered, such as a two- story facility. He explained he also does not support eradicating the wooded area but wants to remain t1exible. MOTION: Malone moved and Aplikowski seconded a motion to approve Planning Case #96-05, Control Data Systems, PUD Master Plan/Minor Subdivision, 4201 North Lexington Avenue, based on the conditions outlined by the Planning Commission and adding Condition #13, The current zero lot line between Parcels A-I and C is not an independent right of the PUD and will require review should there be any significant PUD amendment; and Condition #14, The developable setback, measuring from the easterly park dedication line would be 50 feet with City review and 75 fcet without review. Mr. Fritsinger questioned the definition of "significant PUD amendment" and suggested rewording to "significant site redevelopment". Councilmembers Malone and Aplikowski agreed to this friendly amendment. Motion carried unanimously (4-0). MOTION: Malone moved and Hicks seconded a motion to endorse and accept the Park Dedication Agreement for Planning Case #96-05 per the recommendation of Parks & Recreation Director Walsh. Motion carried unanimously (4-0). I .. I I I I I I I .. I I I I I I I. I I ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JULY 8. 1996 II B. Metropolitan Council Growth Options Mr. Ringwald explained that the proposed resolution endorses the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities (AMM) policy on metropolitan growth. He reviewed the growth projections and policy presented by the AMM which staff recommends be endorsed. Councilmember Malone updated the Council regarding AMM's position to not accept the Metropolitan Council's desire to restrain growth to current MUSA areas. Mayor Probst stated he would support a stronger response than the AMM's but will support it as presented because he believes it represents the issues and provides a good alternative. He commented on the negative impact to Arden Hills' infrastructure which is caused by development beyond the Metro area. MOTION: Malone moved and Aplikowski seconded a motion to adopt Resolution #96-46, Endorsing a Metropolitan Growth Policy and direct staff to forward it to both the Metropolitan Council and AMM. Motion carried unanimously (4-0). C. Oak Avenue Sanitary Sewer Improvement Project Dwane Stafford, Public Works Supervisor, eXplained that the sanitary sewer lines which lay under streets scheduled for reconstruction were televised and it has been determined that the section under Oak Avenue has ten areas where the pipe has failed. Two of the areas are related to improper installation of service laterals and the others were probably caused by poor bedding in the pipe areas. Mr. Stafford advised the City Engineer has solicited bids for these repairs and the following two were received: Infratech Infrastructure Teclmologies, Inc. for $13,934, and Buchen Environmental Services, Inc. for $17,535. He explained they utilize different types of repairs. Infratech uses a repair link which uses a foam backed stainless steel pipe. Buchen uses a seamless tube of polyester yarns which is impregnated with resin. The pipe is inflated and held while the resins cure and become hard. Mr. Stafford advised the stainless steel repair is less costly but the Public Works Department is reluctant to place metal into that type of environment and supports the resin type of repair since it is thinner and the City is able to continue to use the same types of cleaning tools. Mr. Stafford showed samples of the two types of pipes and explained the differences involved in the maintenance. He advised that staff recommends Buchen Environmental Services be hired to conduct the repair using polyester pipes even though it is more expensive. I .. I I I I I I I .. I I I I I I I. I I ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JULY 8. 1996 12 John Grove, Vice President of Buchen Environmental Services, Inc., advised the curing rate of the resin is approximately two hours and the sewer line may need to be temporarily blocked off, depending on the flow and depth of the sewer. If possible, sewage can be diverted and rerouted during that time, He then explained how service laterals are accommodated. MOTION: Malone moved and Aplikowski seconded a motion to authorize the hiring of Buchen Environmental Services, Chaska, Minnesota, to conduct the repairs to the Oak Avenue sanitary sewer at a cost not to exceed $17,535. The motion carried unanimously (4-0). D. Change Order No.1 for 1996 Street Improvement Project Mr. Statford advised that Pine Tree Drive is one of the streets scheduled for an overlay in the 1996 Street Improvement Plan. However, Ramsey County has indicated there may be a conflict at the intersection of Pine Tree Drive and County Road E in that the new overlay will not match the existing pavement on County Road E or the existing curb at the edge of Pine Tree Drive. Therefore, it is necessary to mill a portion of the existing bitwninous surface to a depth of approximately I Yz inches. The concern is that the loop detectors which control the semaphores at this intersection are typically buried only I Yz to 2 y, inches in the pavement and milling this area could damage or completely destroy the existing detectors. Mr. Stafford stated the Public Works Department recommends the Council approve Change Order #1 appropriating $7,317.40 for the replacement of the loop detectors, if necessary, and that the City Engineer be directed to take all precautions possible to protect and save the existing loop detectors, thereby saving any repair or replacement costs. MOTION: Hicks moved and Malone seconded a motion to approve Change Order No. I in the amount of$7,317.40 for the 1996 Street Improvement Project, as presented. The motion carried unanimously (4-0). ADMINISTRATOR COMMENTS Mr. Fritsinger advised staff has mailed the RFQ for City Hall professional services to about 25 firms and due to the delay in preparation, extended the time period for submittal by one additional week. I .. I I I I I I I .. I I I I I I I. I I ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JULY 8. 1996 13 COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Hicks commented on the improvement to County Road F. Councilmember Hicks reported he will be unable to attend the next meeting of the Northwest Youth and Family Services Board Meeting. Councilmember Aplikowski indicated she will attend. Mayor Probst advised regarding the receipt of a request from the League of Minnesota Cities to increase Arden Hill's dues payments by $698 to help cover the cost oflegal action on right-of- way activities. Mr, Fritsinger stated copies will be in the agenda packet for discussion on July 29, 1996. ADJOURN MOTION: .' cks moved and Aplikowski seconded a motion to adjourn the meeting at .9:25 p.m. The motion carried unanimously (4-0), /~~t.1-- Brian Fritsinger City Administrator NOTICE OF MEETINGS A special City Council meeting will be held July IS, 1996, at 7:30 p.m. at Shoreview Community Center and the next regular City Council meeting will be held July 29, 1996, at 7:30 p.m. at New Brighton City Hall.