Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-09-2025 JDA Agenda Packet Joint Development Authority TCAAP Redevelopment Project Joint Development Authority TCAAP Redevelopment Project JDA MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, September 9, 2025, 5:30 p.m. at Arden Hills City Hall 1. Roll Call 2. Approval of Agenda 3. Approval of Minutes 4. Public Input 5. Consent Agenda 6. Old Business 7. Public Hearings a. Planning Case 25-003 and Resolution 2025-002 – Preliminary Plat and Final Plat – Outlot C, TCAAP – Ramsey County 8. New Business a. Approve Revised Sustainability Design Guidelines b. Review Draft Request for Interest c. Discuss Community Engagement Proposal d. Review Road Map 9. Administrative Director’s Report 10. Development Director’s Report 11. Commissioner Updates 12. Adjournment Joint Development Authority TCAAP Redevelopment Project Joint Development Authority TCAAP Redevelopment Project AGENDA ITEM 2 MEMORANDUM DATE: September 9, 2025 TO: Joint Development Authority Board of Commissioners FROM: Directors Jagoe and Mitchell SUBJECT: Approval of Agenda The agenda for the September 9, 2025, JDA Meeting is presented for approval. Action Requested: Approve the agenda for September 9, 2025. Joint Development Authority TCAAP Redevelopment Project Joint Development Authority TCAAP Redevelopment Project AGENDA ITEM 3 MEMORANDUM DATE: September 9, 2025 TO: Joint Development Authority Board of Commissioners FROM: Directors Jagoe and Mitchell SUBJECT: Approval of Minutes The minutes for the previous JDA meetings and work sessions are presented for approval. Attachments: • July 2 Closed JDA Meeting Minutes • July 7 JDA Meeting Minutes • July 21 Closed JDA Meeting Minutes • August 4 JDA Work Session Minutes Action Requested: Approve the minutes from July 2, July 7, July 21, and August 4, 2025. Joint Development Authority Closed Meeting Wednesday, July 2, 2025 Arden Hills City Hall (upstairs conference room) Minutes 5:30 pm Roll Call Joint Development Authority: Chair Jon Wicklund, Commissioner Tara Jebens-Singh, Commissioner Kurt Weber, Commissioner Mary Jo McGuire, Commissioner Tena Monson Also present: Jessica Jagoe (Arden Hills); Ella Mitchell (Ramsey County), Rachel Tierney (Kennedy & Graven); Jenny Boulton (Kutak Rock), Kristine Nogosek (Ramsey County), Kori Land (Levander), James Thomson (Kennedy & Graven), Michelle Weinberg (Kennedy & Graven) Roll call taken. The TCAAP Joint Development Authority Board of Commissioners (JDA) held a special JDA meeting pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 13D.04, subdivision 2, on Wednesday, July 2, 2025, commencing at 5:30 p.m., at Arden Hills City Hall. Closed Meeting Motion by Commissioner Weber seconded by Commissioner McGuire to go into closed session McGuire to go into closed session pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 13D.05, subdivision 3(b) regarding pending litigation in Alatus Arden Hills LLC vs TCAAP Joint Development Authority. Motion carried at 5:30pm. Discussion of litigation. Motion by Commissioner McGuire seconded by Commissioner Weber to reopen the meeting. Motion carried at 6:45pm. Adjournment Motion by Commissioner McGuire to adjourn seconded by Commissioner Monson. Meeting adjourned at 6:46 pm. Approved ___________________________________ ______________________ Jon Wicklund, Chair Date Joint Development Authority Work Session Monday, July 7, 2025 Arden Hills City Council Chambers Minutes 5:30 pm Roll Call Joint Development Authority: Chair Jon Wicklund, Commissioner Tara Jebens-Singh, Commissioner Kurt Weber, Commissioner Mary Jo McGuire, Commissioner Tena Monson Also present: Jessica Jagoe (Arden Hills); Ella Mitchell (Ramsey County), Rachel Tierney (Kennedy & Graven) Roll call taken. Public Input None. New Business a. Review Communications Update Director Mitchell stated in May, Goff Public worked with Ramsey County and the City of Arden Hills on additional inquiries from Star Tribune reporter Matt McKinney for his article about the Outlot A groundbreaking and sustainable design guidelines, which ran on May 10: Green, but not green enough? First building at former TCAAP site misses efficiency targets. Goff Public also worked with project staff to issue a special update to the Rice Creek Commons newsletter list on May 7: Construction underway on first development at Rice Creek Commons. Also in May, the American Institute of Architects Minnesota published an article in the annual ENTER magazine focused on carbon-neutral development at both Rice Creek Commons and the Heights: New Developments in Carbon Neutrality in Minnesota. Director Mitchell explained in June, Goff Public worked with JDA Chair Wicklund, Ramsey County and the City of Arden Hills on a statement about the outcome of the June 25 special JDA meeting regarding the request by Alatus for an extension to the preliminary development agreement. Star Tribune reporter Matt McKinney covered the meeting and decision by the JDA to take no action on the request: Rice Creek Commons board to part with TCAAP site developer citing sluggish pace. The next quarterly Rice Creek Commons newsletter is currently planned for August. There have been nine recent inquiries through the Rice Creek Commons microsite contact portal regarding housing, sustainability, wildlife, and requests for more information about the project. Staff responded to each inquiry directly. Commissioner McGuire thanked staff for their efforts to let the public know what’s going on. Chair Wicklund requested staff provide him with information on how many people are visiting the Rice Creek Commons website. Director Mitchell stated she would pass this information along to the JDA members. b. Review of Prior JDA Development Solicitation Processes Director Mitchell stated the JDA has undertaken two solicitation processes for development partners in the past. The primary documents for these two solicitation processes were presented to the JDA in detail for review and discussion. Commissioner Jebens-Singh questioned who did the evaluating of the proposals. Director Mitchell explained an evaluation subcommittee was formed to complete this task for both solicitation processes. Chair Wicklund stated back in 2016, the City Council was finalizing the TRC as a developer was being selected which allowed for conversations with the developer as the code was being finalized. Commissioner Jebens-Singh commented on the differences between the 2016 and 2023 solicitation processes. She asked what drove the differences. Director Mitchell stated she does not have a really great answer for this, noting she was not part of the 2016 process. She commented on how the scope of the project changes from 2016 to 2023. Commissioner McGuire questioned how many proposals the County received for each solicitation process. Director Mitchell stated the County received four proposals in 2016 and in 2023 the County received six. Commissioner Monson asked why the feedback on the proposals was submitted anonymously in 2023. Director Mitchell indicated she thought this was done at the advice of one of the attorneys. Commissioner Monson commented she would like to avoid an anonymous feedback process. She believed this process was incredibly limiting and she received a great deal of feedback from the public about the approval process because the JDA relied heavily on staff for recommendations. Commissioner Jebens-Singh supported holding the negotiations in a closed session in order to protect conversations and matters that are discussed. Attorney Tierney stated this was a complicated instance because the County owns the property and the JDA was not directly negotiating the sale of the land. She was uncertain that a closed session for the JDA would be necessary. Commissioner Jebens-Singh questioned if there were any common themes as to the barriers, concerns or questions to completing the vision for this project. Director Mitchell explained this was something she could explore and bring back to the JDA. Chair Wicklund stated this was a great question for the JDA to consider. Commissioner McGuire indicated she was sympathetic to both sides of the anonymous feedback process given how these were public meetings. She explained she would like to see a copy of the scoring rubric. Staff provided further information regarding the rubric that was followed in 2023 for the evaluation process. Commissioner Monson asked if the JDA would have a discussion on the want or need for a master developer. She indicated she wanted to learn more about the developer landscape and if a master developer was possible for this project. She stated the financing, mass grading and strategy of this project may have to be further considered. Chair Wicklund believed this would be an important conversation for the JDA to have. He explained he would not be in attendance at the August 4 JDA meeting. It was noted the September JDA meeting would be moved to Tuesday, September 9. Commissioner Weber stated whatever has changed in the development culture from 2016 and 2023 would have to be considered by the JDA. Chair Wicklund stated the TRC may have to be reviewed. Commissioner McGuire stated it was difficult to be back at square one, but it was also exciting to be able to begin this process anew. She hoped the JDA would not be limited in its thinking going forward, but rather that the group would be creative in order to move this development forward. Commissioner Jebens-Singh stated the JDA would have to consider what it knows now that could be built on and what course adjustments could be made. She indicated there may be new technologies or adjustments in the way developers were operating. She commented on how sound judgement has to be used in order to find a path forward for this development. Chair Wicklund suggested the Commissioners write down their thoughts and suggestions for improvements on the evaluation process and pass this information along to staff. c. Review Road Map Director Mitchell reviewed the Road Map with the JDA. Commissioner Monson stated it appears the community event planned for September would not be held. Director Mitchell indicated this event could be further discussed by the JDA in August. Commissioner Monson supported staff proposing an event in order to give the JDA something to react to. She believed now would be a great time to provide the public with an update. Commissioner Jebens-Singh requested staff investigate how changes at the federal level would impact the green energy initiatives for the Rice Creek Commons development. Chair Wicklund recommended staff begin entering 2026 meeting dates. Administrative Director’s Report Director Mitchell provided the JDA with an update on the spine road design plans. Commissioner Monson asked if staff an update on district energy. Director Mitchell reported the County was planning to use a portion of the geothermal planning grant to do an early district energy study in order to align with the spine road design plans. Commissioner Weber asked if staff had an update on the NGIA grant application process. Director Mitchell explained a letter of support was submitted and this grant was not quite at the application process, but was at a site selection process. Development Director’s Report Director Jagoe stated she had no update for the JDA. Commissioner Updates Commissioner McGuire encouraged staff to meet with Peter Lindstrom with the Met Council. Commissioner Weber stated he appreciated the discussion that was held at this meeting and he looked forward to the August 4 JDA meeting. Commissioner Monson asked if staff had an update on Building 116. Director Mitchell stated she would bring information back on this building for the August meeting. Chair Wicklund recommended Building 116 be added to the solicitation process because this was an issue that had to be solved. Commissioner Jebens-Singh explained she visited The Heights earlier today and stated she was inspired by the sustainability guidelines that were followed for this development. Adjournment Meeting adjourned at 6:46 pm. Approved _____________________________________ _______________________ Jon Wicklund, Chair Date Joint Development Authority Closed Meeting Monday, July 21, 2025 Arden Hills City Hall (upstairs conference room) Minutes 5:30 pm Roll Call Joint Development Authority: Chair Jon Wicklund (remote), Commissioner Kurt Weber (remote), Commissioner Tena Monson (remote), Commissioner Tara Jebens-Singh, Commissioner Mary Jo McGuire Also present: Jessica Jagoe (Arden Hills), Ella Mitchell (Ramsey County), Rachel Tierney (Kennedy & Graven), Jenny Boulton (Kutak Rock), Kristine Nogosek (Ramsey County), Kori Land (Levander), James Thomson (Kennedy & Graven), Michelle Weinberg (Kennedy & Graven), Larina DeWalt (Ramsey County, remote) Roll call taken. The TCAAP Joint Development Authority Board of Commissioners (JDA) held a special JDA meeting pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 13D.04, subdivision 2, on Wednesday, July 2, 2025, commencing at 2:02 p.m., at Arden Hills City Hall. Closed Meeting Motion by Commissioner Jebens-Singh seconded by Commissioner McGuire to go into closed session pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 13D.05, subdivision 3(b) regarding pending litigation in Alatus Arden Hills, LLC vs TCAAP Joint Development Authority. Motion carried at 2:02pm. Discussion of litigation. Motion by Commissioner McGuire seconded by Commissioner Weber to reopen the meeting. Motion carried at 3:58 pm. Adjournment Motion by Commissioner McGuire to adjourn seconded by Commissioner Weber. Meeting adjourned at 4:00pm. Approved ___________________________________ ______________________ Jon Wicklund, Chair Date Joint Development Authority Monday, August 4, 2025 Arden Hills City Council Chambers Work Session Minutes 5:30 pm Roll Call Joint Development Authority: Commissioner Tara Jebens-Singh, Commissioner Kurt Weber, Commissioner Mary Jo McGuire, Commissioner Tena Monson Chair Jon Wicklund (excused) was absent Also present: Jessica Jagoe (Arden Hills); Ella Mitchell (Ramsey County); and Rachel Tierney, Kennedy & Graven Roll call taken. Public Input Lynn Diaz, 1143 Ingerson Road, commented on the language that requires all buildings to have solar panels and asked if this applied to all single-family homes. She indicated she was concerned with the fact the government tax credits would go to the development and not the individual installing the solar panels. She recommended that some sort of backup energy source be considered in the event the solar panels failed. Lyle Salmela, 1480 Arden Vista Court, commented on the LEED certification that has been developed. He explained he would like to speak with Rick regarding the recommendations for this project, noting he had suggestions that could get this project over 90 points. New Business a. Review Website Statistics Director Mitchell stated at the July meeting, the JDA requested statistics on the Rice Creek Commons webpage, RiceCreekCommons.com. The following information is provided for the period August 1, 2024, through July 31, 2025. It was noted the site has had 5,505 active users, 21,630 views, 3.93 views per active user with an average time per user being 1 minute and 50 seconds. She provided further information regarding the most viewed pages on the website. Commissioner Weber asked if the number of visits have increased in the last several months. Director Mitchell explained she could speak with her staff and would report back to the JDA with this information. Commissioner Monson indicated she would like to see a full document library on the Rice Creek Commons website. In addition, she wanted to see the JDA answering questions in a more timely manner for residents versus putting information on the website. Director Mitchell stated questions are responded to within the FAQ portion of the website, unless staff provides an answer at a JDA meeting. Commissioner Weber supported giving residents an answer to their questions, with the understanding not all questions can be answered on the spot. b. Review Sustainability Updates Director Mitchell stated the Energy Advisory Committee (EAC) met on July 23 to discuss sustainability and clean energy work updates. An overview of the items discussed was as follows: • LEED for Communities: precertification process • Sustainability Design Guidelines o Proposed revisions o Documentation package • Federal legislation impacts • Xcel pilot project coordination • Geothermal planning grant Rick Carter, LHB, commented on the LEED for Communities process that was being pursued. He noted he was at the point where he would be submitting for precertification. He stated he was at 83 points at this time. He indicated he was most proud of the fact the entire project was all electric and carbon neutral. He reported there was only one other platinum level community in the United States, which was in Florida. Commissioner McGuire thanked Mr. Carter for sharing all of his expertise with the JDA. She stated she appreciated all of his explanations and learning that this type of community was doable. Commissioner Weber explained he also appreciated the sustainability guidelines and learning that the proposed goals were achievable. Director Mitchell reported once the County applies for precertification, the certifying body would review the work and re-evaluation may be required. Commissioner Monson asked if staff had an update from Met Council. Director Mitchell stated she did not have any updates, but noted it was her understanding the Met Council had put a line on their map. Commissioner Weber recommended the Met Council be invited to a future worksession meeting to discuss the future line. Commissioner McGuire supported this recommendation. Further discussion ensued regarding the changes that were made to the electric vehicle terminology. Mr. Carter explained developers would be required to maximize rooftops on residential buildings. He reported federal regulations could change this story in the future and noted tax credits would flow to the project developer. He stated backup energy would be provided by the electrical grid. He indicated onsite battery storage may also be an option in the future. Commissioner McGuire asked if it would be too onerous to require properties to have a backup energy source. Mr. Carter stated he was uncertain if this could be regulated by the JDA or City. Commissioner Monson discussed how all of the power lines would be buried underground which meant it would be less likely there would be power outages. Vice Chair Jebens-Singh reported during the conversations with Ryan Companies, it did not appear there was anything onerous within the proposed sustainability guidelines. Commissioner Weber explained this appears to be the case, noting there were only minor code items that were brought up by Ryan Companies. Mr. Carter commented the only feedback he received was regarding the methodology for confirming the 50% better than code. He then discussed the changes that were made at a federal level that could impact the development of Rice Creek Commons. Vice Chair Jebens-Singh stated she appreciated the fact the door remained open for the proposed sustainability efforts for this project. She recommended the JDA remain conscience of the costs and funding mechanisms going forward. Commissioner Monson reported residential solar took the biggest hit from the federal government. Mr. Carter reported this was the case. Commissioner Monson discussed the potential challenges going forward for batteries given how 90% of battery anodes were made in China. She anticipated a developer would benefit economically from pursuing residential solar versus a district geothermal system. Commissioner Weber stated this would depend on what rebates are being offered from Xcel Energy. He reported in order to meet the LEED certification the JDA may have to consider a district system. Mr. Carter commented the best thing for the development would be to meet the guidelines and he was hoping to see a developer pursuing ground sourced energy through all electric and heat pumps in the buildings. Director Mitchell indicated she was still meeting regularly with Xcel Energy regarding the thermal energy pilot program to better understand their goals. Commissioner Monson asked if staff was coordinating with the Army on this. Director Mitchell stated she has not begun working with the Army on this process noting geothermal was allowed in the deed. Commissioner Weber inquired if staff had spoken with the Army about using the current water system. Director Mitchell stated she had not broached this subject with the Army, but needs to be advanced at some point. c. Discuss Development Solicitation Questions Director Mitchell commented on the process that was followed in the past within the development solicitation process. She reviewed the role and value of having a developer in place. She requested direction from the JDA regarding questions that should be considered within the future development solicitation process. Commissioner McGuire asked if there were examples where the County has been the lead developer in a project of this size. Director Mitchell stated there were no examples, given the size of this property. Commissioner Monson discussed the project that was completed by the St. Paul Port Authority and the commitments they had within The Heights development. She stated it would be important to hear from the County Board as to the appropriate risk profile they were considering for the land sale. Vice Chair Jebens-Singh reported this project had multiple paths forward and the County would have to consider if the project included the mass grading and if it was tied to the land sale. She indicated the JDA would also have to consider if a lead developer should be in place or should there be multiple developers in place. She questioned what needed to be done to get the ball rolling for the next steps for this project. Commissioner Monson stated from the City’s perspective, it was the County’s role to sell the land, but there would be financial implications on the City, depending on how the land was sold. She asked that staff participate in this process in order to better understand the revenue impacts for the City. Vice Chair Jebens-Singh explained she appreciated the fact the JDA was taking a pause in order to better consider how to move this project forward. Commissioner McGuire indicated she agreed with all of the comments that have been made and stated she supported staff investigating this matter further. Commissioner Monson inquired if the JDA should have a procurement policy in place. Director Mitchell stated in the past Ramsey County’s policy has been used as a model in the past, but noted Commissioner Monson was correct, that the JDA did not have a procurement policy in place. She noted she could look into this further with legal counsel. Rachel Tierney, Kennedy & Graven, explained the deferment to Ramsey County was because the County was the fiscal agent and their staff was performing the work. She indicated she could look further into the policies that should be in place for the JDA as this could inform decision making in the future. Vice Chair Jebens-Singh supported this being further investigated by staff and legal counsel. Director Mitchell discussed the changes that have occurred to the housing and office market since 2016. Vice Chair Jebens-Singh recommended staff provide the JDA with further information on the pros and cons of having a lead developer for this project. Commissioner Weber supported staff investigating this topic further. Commissioner Monson agreed and discussed how developers were pulling in multiple developers to complete larger projects. She recommended the RFI go to the Timberwolves organization for consideration. She inquired if the zoning should be looked at in a higher manner versus being so prescriptive. Commissioner Weber asked if the mass grading should be completed prior to pursuing an RFI. Commissioner Monson indicated she was proposing the JDA seek feedback from developers on what their vision for the site would be. Commissioner Weber commented he would be open to this. Director Jagoe discussed how the RFI might help better inform the recommendations for residential and commercial uses. Commissioner McGuire explained she agreed with Commissioner Monson and stated she was curious to see what developers might want to do. Vice Chair Jebens-Singh indicated she did not want the JDA to lead the conversations or expectations but rather hoped the RFI would bring about the highest and best use for this property, while still meeting the JDA’s goals. She hoped the RFI would help developers consider both the challenges and opportunities within the project. Commissioner Monson asked if staff should be directed to reach out to the Timberwolves. Commissioners Weber and McGuire were open to this. Vice Chair Jebens-Singh stated she was uncertain how a Timberwolves stadium would fit into the housing goals proposed for this development. Commissioner Monson indicated this was an opportunity that was not available in 2016 or 2023 and should be kept on the table for further consideration. d. Discuss Community Event Considerations Director Mitchell stated the JDA requested information for a discussion about a potential fall community event. She asked that the JDA consider the goals of a community event and what a successful community event would look like. Commissioner Weber recommended information be presented on the clean energy/ sustainability guidelines and the progress that was being made on the first development within Rice Creek Commons. He also suggested the need for more affordable housing be addressed. Commissioner McGuire suggested a status update be provided on the RFI process. She proposed the County host an online event/zoom meeting because this would be a cost effective way to address the public. Commissioner Monson stated she would like to see an open house event that addressed clean energy and sustainability. She noted a virtual series/webinar could be held in the future in order to educate the public on this project. She recommended the virtual videos be robust in order to properly educate the public. Vice Chair Jebens-Singh supported providing residents with detailed information in more than one manner. Director Mitchell indicated she could brainstorm how to hold an open house and virtual event. e. Review Road Map Director Mitchell reviewed the Road Map with the JDA. Administrative Director’s Report Director Mitchell provided the JDA with an update on the Micro Control Company development. Development Director’s Report Director Jagoe stated the JDA would be meeting next on Tuesday, September 9. Commissioner Updates None. Adjournment Meeting adjourned at 7:32 pm. Approved _____________________________________ _______________________ Tara Jebens-Singh, Vice Chair Date Joint Development Authority TCAAP Redevelopment Project Joint Development Authority TCAAP Redevelopment Project AGENDA ITEM 4 MEMORANDUM DATE: September 9, 2025 TO: Joint Development Authority Board of Commissioners FROM: Directors Mitchell and Jagoe SUBJECT: Public Input The public is invited to provide input. Comments will be limited to three minutes per person. Page 1 AGENDA ITEM – 7a MEMORANDUM DATE: September 9, 2025 TO: Joint Development Authority Board of Commissioners FROM: Jessica Jagoe, Development Director SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat and Final Plat - Outlot C, Rice Creek Commons Second Addition Commissioners Should Consider Motions to approve, table, or deny the following: • Planning Case JDA 25-003 and the adoption of Joint Development Authority Resolution 25-002 for a Preliminary Plat and Final Plat for Rice Creek Commons Second Addition. Background Ramsey County (“Applicant”) has requested approval of a Preliminary Plat and Final Plat to subdivide Outlot C (“Subject Property”), often referred to as the “California Parcel”, of the TCAAP Plat for Rice Creek Commons. The Rice Creek Commons site is in the northwest corner of the city located to the east of U.S. Highway 10 and I-35W, north of Highway 96, west of the Arden Hills Army Training Site, and south of County Road I. On April 9, 2018, the City of Arden Hills approved the TCAAP Plat for Rice Creek Commons. This subdivision created five parcels called Outlots. The following is a description of the Outlots in the TCAAP Plat: • Outlot A: 40.10 acres o This parcel was subdivided in 2025 and replatted as Rice Creek Commons plat. This parcel will be further subdivided in the future as part of the Rice Creek Commons development. • Outlot B: 2.89 acres o This parcel was dedicated to Ramsey County Parks and Recreation for the Rice Creek North Regional Trail corridor and the remeander of Rice Creek. Joint Development Authority TCAAP Redevelopment Project Page 2 • Outlot C: 372.05 acres o Subject Property of JDA application review. In 2018, this parcel was noted to be further subdivided and developed in the future as part of the Rice Creek Commons development. • Outlot D: 1.00 acres o This parcel was dedicated to Ramsey County Parks and Recreation for the Rice Creek North Regional Trail corridor along the eastern boundary of the Rice Creek Commons site. • Outlot E: 1.83 acres o This parcel was a piece of land west of CSAH 13 for an existing retention pond. The purpose of this platting process is for dedication of the public road right-of-way for the Spine Road. Two large Outlots would be created as part of the plat for the future Rice Creek Commons development. These Outlots would be further subdivided and replatted at the time of the future development. The current platting process is not associated with any specific development on the site. A copy of the proposed Preliminary and Final Plat named “Rice Creek Commons Second Addition” are provided in Attachments C and D. The following is a description of the proposed Outlots and right-of-way dedication on the plat: • Outlot A = 93.25 acres (4,062,028 s.f.) o This parcel will be further subdivided and developed in the future as part of the Rice Creek Commons development. • Outlot B = 252.88 acres (11,015,634 s.f.) o This parcel will be further subdivided and developed in the future as part of the Rice Creek Commons development • Rice Creek Boulevard Right-of-Way = 25.92 acres (1,128,912 s.f.) Overall Subject Property Platted Area = 372.04 acres Future further subdivisions of the newly created Outlot A and Outlot B within the Rice Creek Commons development area would be brought forward for review by the Joint Development Authority (JDA) in accordance with the TCAAP Redevelopment Code (TRC). Proposed Conditions – Preliminary and Final Plat The TRC incorporates by reference Chapter 11 of the Arden Hills City Code (AHC) for plat approval for the purpose of design review, subject to the requirements for public infrastructure per the TRC. This process includes City approval of grading/erosion control plans and utilities plans. Fees or charges for public infrastructure or facilities established by or applicable to subdivisions processed under the AHC shall be applied to subdivisions processed under the TRC. Plan Evaluation AHC Chapter 11, Subdivisions 1. Preliminary Plat AHC Section 1130.01 - Conformity with City Plan – Meets Requirements Page 3 Section 1130.01 states that the proposed subdivision shall conform with the City plan. As noted in the background, the proposed plat is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the standards of the TRC. AHC Section 1130.03 and 1130.02 - Street Plan and Streets – Meets Requirements Section 1130.02 addresses the arrangement, character, extent, width, grade and location of all streets, however the TRC includes standards regarding the same standards and supersedes the standards in 1130.02. The plat is for the dedication of the public road right-of-way for the Spine Road. The Spine Road will be through the Subject Property to connect Outlot A, also known as the “Thumb parcel”, and County Road H to County State Aid Highway 96. The proposed public right-of- way for the Spine Road is consistent with the Street Network as shown in Attachment 5 - TCAAP Street Type Plan of the TRC. The two Outlots that are proposed to be created would not hinder the eventual extension of streets and utility services to the Rice Creek Commons development. The proposed public right- of-way includes the roadway intersections for future development. AHC Section 1130.05 – Meets Requirements No additional public easements are required to be dedicated at this time. The need for drainage, utility, and other public easements will be determined at the time Outlot A and Outlot B are subdivided for future development. AHC Section 1130.07 – Lots – Meets Requirements The proposed plat would create Outlot A and Outlot B which will be further subdivided at the time of future development. The lot standards included in the Subdivision Ordinance and TCAAP Redevelopment Code would be evaluated at that time. City Code does require for location, all lots shall abut by their full frontage on a publicly dedicated street or a street that has received legal status as such or will receive such status upon approval of the subject plat. For size, the lot dimensions in subdivisions shall not be less than the minimum dimensions required to secure the minimum lot area specified in the zoning ordinance of the City. The TRC does not establish minimum standards for lots. There are no standards established in the AHC that would apply as those standards are only relevant in the zoning districts established in the AHC. Page 4 Figure 1 Preliminary Plat 2. Final Plat The Applicant is proposing to plat the Subject Property to dedicate the public right-of-way necessary for the Spine Road and create two Outlots. A Final Plat is the final map, drawing or chart indicating the final layout for JDA approval. The Final Plat includes the detailed survey description for each lot in the plat plus notes and dedication, recording and approval statements. The Final Plat is the “recorded document” submitted to the County register and must conform to all state laws. Public Use Dedication Public Use Dedication requirements for the Rice Creek Commons development will be determined at the time Outlot A and Outlot B are subdivided for future development. Public Use Dedication is not required as part of the current platting process. Chapter 13, Zoning Regulations Review The current platting process is not associated with any specific development proposals. Future subdivision and replatting of Outlot A and Outlot B for the Rice Creek Commons development will be evaluated based on the Arden Hills Zoning Code and the TCAAP Redevelopment Code. Additional Review Comments Public Works/City Engineer The Public Works Director/City Engineer has reviewed the plat plans. A memorandum has been prepared by the consultant for the Public Works Director/City Engineer and the Applicant as a recommended condition of approval shall be required to comply with the memorandum dated September 2, 2025 (Attachment E) prior to recording of the Final Plat. Page 5 Rice Creek Watershed District Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) has reviewed the plats and has no additional comments on the plans. Comments were provided related to the construction of public infrastructure and future development which were shared with the Applicant. MnDOT MnDOT has reviewed the plat plans and provided comments on future transit and permitting requirements which were shared with the Applicant. Ramsey County Ramsey County Public Works has reviewed the plans and have no additional comments at this time. The Applicant has provided a response letter to the agency review comments received which has been included as Attachment F. Findings of Fact The Joint Development Authority must make a finding as to whether or not the proposed application would adversely affect the surrounding neighborhood or the community as a whole based on the aforementioned factors. Staff offers the following five findings for consideration: • The former Twin Cities Army Ammunitions Plant (TCAAP) site is in the northwest corner of the city located to the east of U.S. Highway 10 and I-35W, north of Highway 96, west of the Arden Hills Army Training Site, and south of County Road I. • Ramsey County has requested a Preliminary Plat and Final Plat of the TCAAP, Outlot C site in order to subdivide the parcel for delineation and dedication of the public right-of- way for the Spine Road. • The current platting process is not associated with any specific development on the site. • The future subdivision and replatting of Outlots A & B - Rice Creek Commons Second Addition for the Rice Creek Commons development would be evaluated at that time based on all applicable provisions and regulations in the City Code and the TCAAP Redevelopment Code. • The proposed Preliminary Plat and Final Plat are consistent with the Arden Hills Zoning Map, TCAAP Regulating Plan, and the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Options and Motion Language The following are motion language options for the Joint Development Authority Board to consider. • Approval with Conditions: Motion to approve JDA Planning Case 25-003 and adopt Resolution 2025-002 for a Preliminary Plat and Final Plat of Outlot C a 372.04 acre parcel within Rice Creek Commons, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by the conditions in the September 9, 2025 Report to the Joint Development Authority Board: Page 6 1. The Applicant shall record the Final Plat with Ramsey County within sixty (60) days of the JDA’s approval and a copy of the recorded plat shall be provided to the City. 2. All items identified in the September 2, 2025, City PW/Engineering Division memo shall be addressed prior to the recording of the Final Plat. All comments shall be adopted herein by reference. • Approval as Submitted: Motion to approve JDA Planning Case 25-003 and adopt Resolution 2025-002 for a Preliminary Plat and Final Plat of Outlot C a 372.04 acre parcel within Rice Creek Commons, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans in the September 9, 2025 Report to the Joint Development Authority Board. • Denial: Motion to deny JDA Planning Case 25-003 for a Preliminary Plat and Final Plat of Outlot C a 372.04 acre parcel within Rice Creek Commons, based on the following findings: findings to deny should specifically reference the reasons for denial and why those reasons cannot be mitigated. • Table: Motion to table JDA Planning Case 25-003 for a Preliminary Plat and Final Plat of Outlot C a 372.04 acre parcel within Rice Creek Commons: a specific reason and information request should be included with a motion to table. Public Notice Notice of the public hearing for the Preliminary Plat and Final Plat was published in the Pioneer Press on August 29, 2025, and mailed to all properties within 1,000 feet of the Subject Property. Staff has not received any public comments regarding this application. Deadline for Agency Actions The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on August 15, 2025. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the Joint Development Authority is required to act on this request by October 13, 2025 (60 days). Attachments A. Land Use Application B. Narrative from Ramsey County C. Preliminary Plat D. Final Plat E. Public Works Director/City Engineer Review Memo F. Ramsey County Comment Response Letter G. JDA Resolution 2025-002 SHEET 8 SHEET 7 SHEET 6 SHEET 5 SHEET 4 SHEET 3 INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 35-W INTERSTAT E H I G H W A Y 3 5 - W US T R U N K H I G H W A Y 1 0 C . S . A . H . N O . 9 6 OUTLOT B OUTLOT A RICE C R E E K B L V D . 7533 SUNWOOD DR NW SUITE 206 RAMSEY, MN 55303 (763) 433-2851 ©Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2025, All Rights Reserved R THIS PLAT PREPARED BY: SHEET 1 OF 8 SURVEYOR'S NOTES A) PROPERTY ZONED: (TRC) MULTIPLE ZONES. B) CONTOUR INTERVAL = 2 FT. & 10 FT. C) UTILITIES SHOWN PER GOPHER STATE ONE CALL TICKET NO. 242762099 D.) TOTAL PLAT AREA = 16,206,574 SQ. FT. OR 372.05 ACRES E.) DATE SURVEY WORK WAS COMPLETED 4-11-2025 F.) BENCHMARK: MNDOT "SCHERER" Elev: 913.17' (NAVD88 Datum) G.) FLOOD DATA PROVIDED BY FEMA WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF 06/04/2010 - ZONE "X" UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED DESCRIPTION Outlot C, TCAAP, Ramsey County, Minnesota. ZONING REQUIREMENTS - TRC NOT SHOWN AS DIRECTED BY CITY OF ARDEN HILLS PROPERTY OWNERSHIP THE TITLE FOR THIS PROPERTY IS VESTED TO COUNTY OF RAMSEY COUNTY. PROPERTY I.D. NO. : 163023210001 ADDRESS: 0 COUNTY ROAD I W, ARDEN HILLS MN 55102 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION _______________________________ Matthew M. Bomstad License Number 57991 I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. __________ Date IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE TOTAL BUILDING COVERAGE = 16,395 SQ. FT. EXISTING IMPERVIOUS SURFACE = 1,040,368 SQ. FT. TOTAL=6.5% R SCALE IN FEET 0 100 200 ADJACENT PARCEL LINES RIGHT OF WAY PLAT BOUNDARY LINE EASEMENT LINE SECTION LINE PLAT RIGHT OF WAY EXISTING EASEMENT LINE QUARTER LINE EDGE OF WATER PRELIMINARY PLAT OF RICE CREEK COMMONS SECOND ADDITION SEC T I O N 9 SEC T I O N 1 6 VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE U S H I G H W A Y 1 0 CSAH 96 IN T E R S T A T E H I G H W A Y 3 5 W / U S H I G H W A Y 1 0 C S A H 1 0 CO. RD. H I N T E R S T A T E H I G H W A Y 3 5 W PLAT CO. RD. I W R 08/29/2025 89 0 8 9 0 890 890 890 8 9 0 888 8 8 8 888 8 8 8 88 8 8 8 8 8 8 6 88 6 88 6 88 4 8 8 6 8 8 6 8 8 6 886 88 4 88 4 88 4 8 8 4 88 0 88 0 8 8 0 8 7 6 87 6 8 7 6 886 8 8 4 886 884 8 8 6 8 8 6 88 6 8 8 4 8 8 6 88 0 878 8 7 4 8 8 0 88 4 8 8 4 880870872874 87 4 8808 9 0 89 6 8 8 4 8 9 8 9 0 2 9 0 0 88 6 8 9 0 89 6 8 8 8 88 6 8 8 8 8 8 6 8 7 6 8 8 0 8 7 4 880 886 884 874 874 880 88 2 89 0 89 2 8 9 2 8 9 4 8 9 4 89 6 8 9 6 890 896 8 9 6 894892 892 890 8 9 0 888 888 89 0 8 8 8 88 8 888 8 8 8 888 88 8 88 6 88 6 888 886 886 888 8 8 8 888 888 8 8 8 88 8 888 888 8 9 2 892 8 9 2 892 8 9 2 892 89 2892 8 9 2 894 898 89 6 89 6 8 9 4 894 89 4 8 9 6 892 894 OUTLOT A 93.25 ACRES 4,062,028 SQ FT SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 9 NOT MONUMENTED, POSITION BASED ON WITNESS MONUMENT REFERENCED ON CERTIFICATE OF LOCATION DATED 10/13/2016 L=517.47 R=772.0 0 Δ =3 8°2 4'1 9 " S 71°19'11" E 32.25 S 31°55'49" E 62.21 S 22°09'34" W 25.11 L =3 6 7 .6 4 R =7 7 2 .0 0 Δ =2 7 °1 7 '0 8 " S 7 4 ° 1 1 ' 2 6 " E 73 . 2 6 ' S 8 2 ° 0 5 ' 0 1 " E 2 1 2 . 7 6 N 7 2 ° 4 4 ' 3 1 " E 3 6 3 . 8 8 N 2 6 ° 5 7 ' 4 0 " E 2 2 7 . 7 3 N 4 6 ° 5 1 ' 4 6 " E 3 9 8 . 0 7 N 5 3 ° 4 6 ' 2 1 " E 2 3 2 . 7 9 N 13°32'2 5 " W 6 5 2 . 0 0 N 09°38'08" W 3 0 1 . 4 6 N 09°37'39" W 8 7 8 . 0 2 N 2 9 ° 3 4 ' 0 3 " E 13 6 . 8 0 N 00°01'27" W 82.61 N 43 ° 2 4 ' 2 3 " W 144 . 8 0 R L S 4 3 0 5 5 RLS 43055 RLS 43055 S 36 ° 4 8 ' 0 5 " E 111. 9 4 S 00°59'24" E 76.71 S 4 4 ° 2 4 ' 3 7 " W 9 9 . 0 1 S 00°59'24" E 298.19 L =1 3 0 .1 9 R =1 0 5 5 .8 8 Δ =7 °0 3 '5 3 " S 5 2 ° 5 3 ' 5 3 " E 53. 8 7 S 07°52'06" E 70.00 S 3 7 ° 0 6 ' 0 7 " W 53 . 8 2 S 07°54'01" E 4 1 9 . 7 8 S 47°35'25" E 112.08 S 07°54'01" E 71.04 S 31 ° 4 7 ' 4 0 " W 104. 2 4 L=283.48 R=510.00 Δ=31°50'5 0" N 66°27'42" E 16.69 L =5 3 1 .5 6 R =6 3 2 .0 0 Δ =4 8 °1 1 '2 5 " S 3 9 ° 3 8 ' 4 7 " W 9 9 . 8 0 S 00°59'24" E 75.78 S 37 ° 1 2 ' 2 1 " E 118. 4 8 S 00°59'24" E 285.90 L =1 4 4 .9 6 R =1 1 8 5 .6 2 Δ =7 °0 0 '1 9 " S 37°05'59" W 55.16 S 07°54'01" E 70.00 S 52°53'59" E 55.15 S 07°53'59" E 4 2 6 . 3 2 S 3 8 ° 2 3 ' 3 9 " W 9 6 . 8 3 S 07°54 ' 0 1 " E 71.77 S 42 ° 2 6 ' 0 6 " E 114 . 6 6 RL S 4 3 0 5 5 RLS 1 5 2 3 0 INTERSTATE HIG H W A Y 3 5 - W NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 16 WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9 WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 16 OUTLOT B 252.88 ACRES 11,015,634 SQ FT C H =3 6 4 .1 8 C B =N 1 4 °3 4 '3 9 "W C H =5 1 6 .0 3 C B =N 2 4 °4 9 '0 6 "W N 74°59'08" W 58.16 13 0 . 0 0 ' 14 0 . 0 0 13 0 . 0 0 ' 138.87 2.13 AREA DESCRIBED IN RESOLUTION THAT IS NOW INTERSTATE I-35 W / US HIGHWAY 10 DOC NO. 4592674 SH E E T 2 SH E E T 4 MA T C H L I N E RLS 4 3 0 5 5 RLS 4 3 0 5 5 RLS 43 0 5 5 SHEET 8 SHEET 2 MATCH LINE 14 0 . 0 ' CH=279.84CB=N 59°03'43"W C H =1 4 4 .8 7 C B =S 4 °2 9 '2 8 "E C H =1 3 0 .1 1 C B =S 4 °3 1 '1 6 "E 37 . 7 6 38.88 17 5 . 0 0 3 2 5 . 0 0 MNDOT R/ W D I S C MNDOT R / W D I S C WET LAND WE T L A N D WET LAND WET LAND WET LAND WET LAND WET LAND WET LAND WE T L A N D WET LAND WET LAND NOT T A N G E N T NOT T A N G E N T TANG E N T NOT N O T T A N G E N T NOT T A N G E N T TA N G E N T NO T RICE C R E E K B L V D . RICE CREEK BLVD. ZONE A PER FEMA FLOOD PANEL 27123C0010G, WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF 06/04/2010 EL E V = 8 9 3 . 0 6 ' EL E V = 8 8 9 . 2 3 ' ELEV= 887.9 4 ' ELEV = 8 9 1 . 0 6 ' ELEV= 888.05' EL E V = 8 9 1 . 9 5 ' ELEV = 8 9 0 . 5 1 ' ELE V = 8 9 3 . 8 0 ' EL E V = 8 8 0 . 4 1 ' ELEV= 874.14' ELEV= 8 8 5 . 5 2 ' ELE V = 8 8 3 . 5 9 ' ELE V = 8 8 4 . 8 5 ' E L E V = 8 8 4 . 6 8 ' SEE SHEET 3 FOR DETAIL SEE SHEET 3 FOR DETAIL CH=507.84 CB=N 5 4°5 9'1 6 "W N 6 6 ° 2 7 ' 4 3 " E 6 0 5 . 6 7 S 15°0 0 ' 5 2 " W 141.00 25.92 ACRES 1,128,912 SQ FT 25.9 2 A C R E S 1,12 8 , 9 1 2 S Q F T G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G- D G- D G-D G-D G- D G- D G- D G- D G- D G- D G-D G-D G-D G- D G- D G- D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D OE OE OEOE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE >> >> l l OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D F-D F-D F-D F-D F-D F-D F-D F-D > > > > > > > > > > > > G U Y U U U U BBBBBB BBB S E F F CL V T CL V T CL V T D U U C S D S > > > > > > > > > >> >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> > > > > >> >> C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-DC-D C- D C- D C- D C- D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D > > > l l lll l l lll l l l l l l l l l l l l llllllll l l llllllllll l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l E EE E E E E E E E E X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU D D W C L V T CL V T CL V T CL V T OE S S S S S D U >> > > W || || R SCALE IN FEET 0 100 200 LEGEND ADJACENT PARCEL LINES RIGHT OF WAY PLAT BOUNDARY LINE DENOTES MONUMENT FOUND, DESCRIPTION INCLUDED ON SURVEY EASEMENT LINE DENOTES 1/2 INCH X 14 INCH IRON MONUMENT SET WITH A PLASTIC CAP MARKED BY LIC. NO. 57991 SECTION LINE PLAT RIGHT OF WAY EXISTING EASEMENT LINE DENOTES FOUND CAST IRON MONUMENT QUARTER LINE 7533 SUNWOOD DR NW SUITE 206 RAMSEY, MN 55303 (763) 433-2851 ©Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2025, All Rights Reserved R THIS PLAT PREPARED BY: SHEET 2 OF 8 PRELIMINARY PLAT OF RICE CREEK COMMONS SECOND ADDITION 8 8 4 88 0 8 7 6 8 8 4 8 8 4 8 8 6 88 0 878 8 7 4 8 8 0 88 4 8 8 4 880 870872874 87 4 880 8 9 0 89 6 8 8 4 8 9 8 9 0 2 9 0 0 88 6 8 9 0 89 6 8 8 8 88 6 8 8 8 8 8 6 8 7 6 8 8 0 8 7 4 880 886 884 874 874 880 88 2 89 0 89 2 8 9 2 8 9 4 8 9 4 89 6 8 9 6 890 X > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > B B B B BB B BB S CL V T D U U C S D S > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>>> >> >> >> C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D >>>>> > > l l l l l l lllll l l l l l lllll l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l E E E EEEEE E E E E E E E E E EE EE E E X X X X X X X X S S S S S D >>> > > > > > L=476.34 R=772.0 0 Δ =3 5°2 1'1 0 " S 74°11'26" E 73.26 ' S 8 2 ° 0 5 ' 0 1 " E 2 1 2 . 7 6 N 7 2 ° 4 4 ' 3 1 " E 3 6 3 . 8 8 S 15°0 0 ' 5 2 " W 141.00 N 43 ° 2 4 ' 2 3 " W 144 . 8 0 RLS 1 5 2 3 0 N 74°59'08" W 58.16138.87 2.13 AREA DESCRIBED IN RESOLUTION THAT IS NOW INTERSTATE I-35 W / US HIGHWAY 10 DOC NO. 4592674 37.76 38.88 17 5 . 0 0 3 2 5 . 0 0 MNDOT R / W D I S C WET LAND RICE CREEK RICE CREEK NOT T A N G E N T RIC E C R E E K B L V D . (C. S . A . H . 1 3 ) ZONE A PER FEMA FLOOD PANEL 27123C0010G, WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF 06/04/2010 ELEV= 891.95' ELE V = 8 9 0 . 5 1 ' ELE V = 8 9 3 . 8 0 ' ELEV= 880.41' E L E V = 8 7 4 . 1 4 ' CB R=898.10 S (15IN RCP) NE (15IN RCP) 890.60I = 890.60I = CB R=902.13 N (15IN RCP)898.66I = CB R=902.26 E (15IN RCP) 896.76I = CB R=899.28 E (15IN RCP) 894.43I = S (15IN RCP) 897.46I = W (15IN RCP) 895.03I = MH SSWR R=881.29 W (PVC) 872.63 E (PVC) 872.63 I = I = CB R=897.31 NW (24IN RCP) 886.71I = E (24IN RCP) 887.68I = FES/24IN RCP ELEV=885.90 SW (15IN RCP) 892.41I = FES ELEV=882.08 FES ELEV=886.01 MH SSWR R= 896.86 I= SW (8IN PVC) 875.22 I= N (8IN PVC) 875.22 CB R=888.98 I= E (24IN RCP) 880.88 I= W (24IN RCP) 883.13 CB R=892.32 MH SSWR R= 892.70 I= SW (8IN PVC) 876.55 I= N (8IN PVC) 876.55 FES ELEV=885.71 CB R=891.60 I= NW (29X18IN RCP) 885.87 I= SW (18IN RCP) 885.87 I= S (29X18IN RCP)887.65 I= NE (15IN RCP) 887.00 SUMP= 884.50 MH STRM R=891.34 I= SW (18IN RCP) 885.84 I= NE (18IN RCP) 885.94 SUMP= 884.09 CB R=891.99 I= SW (15IN RCP) 888.19 I= NE (15IN RCP) 888.19 CB R=892.22 I= SW (15IN RCP) 888.37 I= NE (15IN RCP) 888.37 CB R=891.85 I= SW (15IN RCP) 888.50 MH SSWR R= 893.59 I= SE (8IN PVC) 877.55 I= NW (8IN PVC) 877.55 CB R=893.44 I= SE (29X18IN RCP) 888.34 I= NW (18IN RCP) 888.34 I= NE (15IN RCP) 888.44 MH SSWR R= 894.33 I= SE (8IN PVC) 878.22 I= NW (8IN PVC) 878.22 CB R=893.71 I= SW (15IN RCP) 889.68 MH SSWR R= 895.07 I= SE (8IN PVC) 878.71 I= NW (8IN PVC) 878.71 CB R=898.56 CB R=898.38 I= N (24IN RCP) 889.94 I= E (24IN RCP) 889.94 I= SW (15IN RCP) 889.94 CB R=898.33 I= W (18IN RCP) 890.78 I= E (15IN RCP) 891.03 I= S (15IN RCP) 893.68 CB R=897.56 I= N (15IN RCP) 893.76 MH SSWR R=885.39 MH SSWR R= 897.13 I= W 873.36 I= N (PVC) 873.36 I= S 873.36 I= S 884.98 FES ELEV= 874.60 INV. = 874.90 STRM (INV) ELEV= 882.82 CB R=894.48 I= N (15IN RCP) 890.98 I= S (15IN RCP) 890.98 CB R=897.33 I= W (15IN RCP) 891.28 I= E (15IN RCP) 891.28 CB R=897.06 I= N (15IN RCP) 893.31 CB R=897.01 I= W (24IN RCP) 8 8 8 . 4 3 I= S (24IN RCP) 8 8 8 . 4 3 MH STRM R=885.80 I= SE (24IN RCP) 878.20 I= W (24IN RCP) 878.20 CB R=883.07 I= SE (24IN RCP) 877.27 I= NW (24IN RCP) 877.27 FES (INV) R=876.39 FES ELEV= 883.09 INV= 874.28 L=283.51 R=509.51 Δ=31°52'56" CH=279.87CB=N59°03'43"W 25. 9 2 A C R E S 1,1 2 8 , 9 1 2 S Q F T OUTLOT B 252.88 ACRES 11,015,634 SQ FT R SCALE IN FEET 500 100 LEGEND ADJACENT PARCEL LINES RIGHT OF WAY PLAT BOUNDARY LINE DENOTES MONUMENT FOUND, DESCRIPTION INCLUDED ON SURVEY EASEMENT LINE DENOTES 1/2 INCH X 14 INCH IRON MONUMENT SET WITH A PLASTIC CAP MARKED BY LIC. NO. 57991 SECTION LINE PLAT RIGHT OF WAY EXISTING EASEMENT LINE DENOTES FOUND CAST IRON MONUMENT QUARTER LINE 7533 SUNWOOD DR NW SUITE 206 RAMSEY, MN 55303 (763) 433-2851 ©Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2025, All Rights Reserved R THIS PLAT PREPARED BY: SHEET 3 OF 8 PRELIMINARY PLAT OF RICE CREEK COMMONS SECOND ADDITION 9 0 0 900 8 9 2 892 8 9 2 892 8 9 2 89 6 89 8 89 8 8 9 4 894 89 4 8 9 6 892 894 89 6 89 6 898 9 0 2 9 0 0 9 0 0 900 9 0 2 900 8 9 8 8 9 6 8 9 4 9 0 6 9 0 6 908 908908908908 908 90 4 902 9 1 0 910 9 1 2 9 1 2 914 914 910 9 0 2 9 0 4 9 1 2 9 1 0 9 0 4 906 916 914 914 916 914 914 914 912 916 914 91 2 9 1 2 912 914 9 1 2 9 1 2 916 914 930 92 8 920 91 2 9 1 0 9 1 0 9 3 2 930 9 1 6 912 914 916 918 920 9 2 2 9 2 4 9 2 6 924 92 0 918 92 0 922 9 1 8 9 1 6 912 90 2 91 0 9 1 2 L =3 8 9 .5 8 R =5 5 8 0 .4 1 Δ =4 °0 0 '0 0 " N 39 ° 0 9 ' 5 1 " W 163 0 . 1 3 N 35 ° 0 9 ' 5 1 " W 7 7 4 . 7 8 US A R M Y C O R E N G M O N U M E N T . MNDOT R/W DISC MNDOT R/W DISC MNDOT R/W DISC MND O T R / W D I S C RLS 4 3 0 5 5 S 47°35'25" E 112.08 S 07°54'01" E 71.04 S 31 ° 4 7 ' 4 0 " W 104. 2 4 S 07°54'01" E 2 9 8 . 7 5 S 60°23'39" E 27.54 S 16°50'33" E 60.02 S 26°44'26" W 27.57 L =2 5 4 .5 5 R =8 0 0 .0 0 Δ =1 8 °1 3 '5 1 " S 38 ° 3 8 ' 2 2 " E 2 8 5 . 3 9 S 83°38'22" E 29.70 S 38 ° 3 8 ' 2 2 " E 60.0 0 S 06°21'38" W 29.70 S 38 ° 3 8 ' 2 2 " E 7 2 6 . 9 9 S 83°59'56" E 28.11 S 38°38'24" E 60.05 S 06°04'03" W 28.43 S 3 8 ° 2 3 ' 3 9 " W 9 6 . 8 3 S 07°54 ' 0 1 " E 71.77 S 42 ° 2 6 ' 0 6 " E 114 . 6 6 S 07°54'01" E 2 9 5 . 6 4 L =5 0 4 .3 1 R =9 4 0 .0 0 Δ =3 0 °4 4 '2 1 " S 38 ° 3 8 ' 2 2 " E 2 8 1 . 3 9 S 06°21'38" W 35.36 S 38 ° 3 8 ' 2 2 " E 60.0 0 S 8 3 ° 3 8 ' 2 2 " E 35 . 3 6 S 38 ° 3 8 ' 2 2 " E 1 2 0 2 . 0 0 43.84 NOR T H L I N E O F T H E SOU T H W E S T 1 / 4 O F S E C T I O N 1 6 US T R U N K H I G H W A Y N O . 1 0 OUTLOT A 93.25 ACRES 4,062,028 SQ FT OUTLOT B 252.88 ACRES 11,015,634 SQ FT 51.0 5 157 9 . 0 8 ( D E E D 1 4 0 ° 5 0 ' 1 0 " 1 5 7 9 . 0 5 ) 1 4 0 . 0 0 1 4 0 . 0 0 14 0 . 0 0 WEST 1/4 OF SECTION 16 FOUND RAMSEY COUNTY CAST IRON MONUMENT US T R U N K H I G H W A Y N O . 1 0 SH E E T 2 SH E E T 4 MA T C H L I N E SHEET 7 SHEET 4 MATCH LINE 2 2 5 . 0 0 ' L=74.63 R=800.00 Δ=5°20'43" N 13°32'2 5 " W 6 5 2 . 0 0 C H =3 8 9 .5 1 C B =S 3 7 °0 9 '5 1 "E (DEE D 1 4 4 ° 5 0 ' 1 0 " 7 7 4 . 6 6 ) (DEE D R = 5 5 7 9 . 5 8 ) WE T L A N D RICE C R E E K B L V D . (C.S . A . H . 1 3 ) ELE V = 9 1 9 . 5 2 ' ELEV= 908.01' ELEV= 911.77' ELEV= 907.47' ELEV = 8 9 9 . 1 1 ' EL E V = 8 9 3 . 0 6 ' ELEV = 9 1 1 . 4 7 ' 25.9 2 A C R E S 1,12 8 , 9 1 2 S Q F T G- D G- D G- D G- D G-D G- D G- D G- D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OEOE OE OEOE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OEO E OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE O E O E OE OE OE OE OE OE OEOE OE OE OE O E O E OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l E-D E-D E-D OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE G - D G - D OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE O E O E OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE E G G G V CL V T E CL V T CL V T V CL V T E E CL V T P H P P P P P P P P H PPPP P P H H C - D C - D C - D C - D C - D C - D C - D C - D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C - D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X OU C C C C C C C C C C C C OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU > > U WS H W | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | || | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || |||| || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || R SCALE IN FEET 0 100 200 LEGEND ADJACENT PARCEL LINES RIGHT OF WAY PLAT BOUNDARY LINE DENOTES MONUMENT FOUND, DESCRIPTION INCLUDED ON SURVEY EASEMENT LINE DENOTES 1/2 INCH X 14 INCH IRON MONUMENT SET WITH A PLASTIC CAP MARKED BY LIC. NO. 57991 SECTION LINE PLAT RIGHT OF WAY EXISTING EASEMENT LINE DENOTES FOUND CAST IRON MONUMENT QUARTER LINE 7533 SUNWOOD DR NW SUITE 206 RAMSEY, MN 55303 (763) 433-2851 ©Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2025, All Rights Reserved R THIS PLAT PREPARED BY: SHEET 4 OF 8 PRELIMINARY PLAT OF RICE CREEK COMMONS SECOND ADDITION 914 916 914 930 92 8 920 932 9 1 0 938 93 6 9 3 4 93 4 934 936 938 9 3 2 9 3 2 940 940 926 9 2 8 930 930 9 2 4 9 2 2 9 2 0 93 0 932 934 9 3 6 928 926 9 2 4 9 1 6 920 914 916 918 920 9 2 2 9 2 4 9 2 6 924 92 0 918 92 6 92 6 924 9 2 2 92 0 91 8 916 916 916 920 930 934 936 940 942 942 9 5 0 95695 4 948 9 5 0 9 4 8 9 4 8 9 4 8 9 4 8 946 944 940 930 9 4 0 9 4 2 92 6 9 2 6 954 95 4 95 2 942 944 946 948 952 95 0 9 5 2 954 95 4 954 96 4 95 6 9 5 2 9 5 2 9 5 2 954 956 956 9 5 6 9 6 2 9 6 0 9 5 4 950 958 952 960 9 4 4 94 4 9 4 6 9 4 4 9 4 6 94 8 N 8 9 ° 4 6 ' 3 0 " W 1 1 9 2 . 9 5 N 39 ° 0 9 ' 5 1 " W 154 . 8 4 N 5 5 ° 3 1 ' 1 7 " W 3 1 2 . 4 7 N 39 ° 0 9 ' 5 1 " W 3 4 7 . 7 3 N 44 ° 4 3 ' 4 8 " W 5 6 7 . 0 8 RLS 4 3 0 5 5 RLS 4 3 0 5 5 RLS 4 3 0 5 5 RLS 4 3 0 5 5 S 38 ° 3 8 ' 2 2 " E 7 2 6 . 9 9 S 83°59'56" E 28.11 S 38°38'24" E 60.05 S 06°04'03" W 28.43 S 38 ° 3 8 ' 2 2 " E 3 7 9 . 0 1 S 83°38'22" E 43.84 S 38°38'22" E 70.00 S 06°21'38" W 43.84 S 38 ° 3 8 ' 2 2 " E 1 9 9 . 1 0 L=834.23 R=936.00 Δ=51°03'57" S 89°42'19" E 58.13 N 59°16'51" E 112.17 S 82°29'47" E 76.38 S 39°01'14" E 83.15 10 1 9 . 6 2 S 38 ° 3 8 ' 2 2 " E 1 2 0 2 . 0 0 S 06°21'38" W 43.84 S 38 ° 3 8 ' 2 2 " E 70.0 0 S 8 3 ° 3 8 ' 2 2 " E 43 . 8 4 S 38 ° 3 8 ' 2 2 " E 1 9 9 . 1 0 L=959.00 R=1076.00 Δ=51°03'57" S 89°42'19" E 60.61 S 45°37'10" E 81.34 S 82°30'21" E 70.95 N 64°05'18" E 87.52 WEST LINE OF THE SE1/4 OF SECTION 16 SO U T H 1 / 4 O F S E C T I O N 1 6 FO U N D R A M S E Y C O U N T Y C A S T IR O N M O N U M E N T C. S . A . H N O . 9 6 OUTLOT A 93.25 ACRES 4,062,028 SQ FT OUTLOT B 252.88 ACRES 11,015,634 SQ FT SO U T H L I N E O F S O U T H E A S T 1 / 4 O F S E C T I O N 1 6 SO U T H L I N E O F S O U T H W E S T 1/ 4 O F S E C T I O N 1 6 140. 0 0 1 4 0 . 0 0 N 8 9 ° 2 9 ' 5 2 " E 2 6 2 2 . 3 4 13 1 1 . 1 7 US T R U N K H I G H W A Y N O . 1 0 RL S 4 3 0 5 5 SHEET 6 SHEET 5 MATCH LINE (DE E D 1 3 5 ° 1 6 ' 1 3 " ) (DE E D 1 4 0 ° 5 0 ' 1 0 " ) (D E E D 1 2 4 ° 2 8 ' 4 4 " ) (DE E D 1 4 0 ° 5 0 ' 1 0 " ) (9 0 ° 1 3 ' 3 0 " 1 1 9 2 . 9 6 ) NO T T A N G E N T NO T T A N G E N T RIC E C R E E K B L V D . (C . S . A . H . 1 3 ) EL E V = 9 3 1 . 4 0 ' ELEV = 9 4 3 . 3 7 ' ELEV = 9 2 0 . 4 4 ' ELEV = 9 1 8 . 7 8 ' ELE V = 9 1 9 . 5 2 ' 25. 9 2 A C R E S 1,1 2 8 , 9 1 2 S Q F T >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G- D G- D G- D G- D G- D G- D G- D G- D G- D G- D G- D G- D G- D G- D G- D G- D G- D G- D G-D OE OE l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l OE OE OE OE OE OE OE O E O E OE OE OE OE OE O E O E O E O E O E O E O E O E O E O E O E O E O E O E O E O E O E OE OE OE OE OE OE O E O E O E OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE > > > > > > >>>>>> >> >> OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OEOE OE OE OE OE OE OE O E l l ll l l l l l l l lll l l l l l l >> >> >> OE OE O E O E O E O E OE OE OE OE OE OE O E O E OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OEOE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE U V V U U G U U U CL V T CL V T D D D D D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D E-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C- D C- D C- D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C - D C - D C - D C - D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C-D C-D C-D C- D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D E- D E- D E- D E- D E- D X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X OE OU F X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X W CL V T E E M W W W || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || |||| || || 7533 SUNWOOD DR NW SUITE 206 RAMSEY, MN 55303 (763) 433-2851 ©Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2025, All Rights Reserved R THIS PLAT PREPARED BY: SHEET 5 OF 8 R SCALE IN FEET 0 100 200 LEGEND ADJACENT PARCEL LINES RIGHT OF WAY PLAT BOUNDARY LINE DENOTES MONUMENT FOUND, DESCRIPTION INCLUDED ON SURVEY EASEMENT LINE DENOTES 1/2 INCH X 14 INCH IRON MONUMENT SET WITH A PLASTIC CAP MARKED BY LIC. NO. 57991 SECTION LINE PLAT RIGHT OF WAY EXISTING EASEMENT LINE DENOTES FOUND CAST IRON MONUMENT QUARTER LINE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF RICE CREEK COMMONS SECOND ADDITION 948 9 5 0 9 4 8 9 4 8 9 4 8 956 954 95 0 948 9 4 0 9 4 2 92 6 9 2 6 9 2 6 9 3 0 9 4 0 9 4 6 9 4 8 9 5 0 9 5 0 9 5 0 9 5 2 952 9 5 4 95 4 956 95 8 95 6 95 6 95 8 954 9 5 4 95 2 9 5 8 9 6 0 9 6 4 96 0 9 6 2 942 94 6 9 5 0 9 5 2 9 4 4 9 3 4 9 3 8 95 4 954 95 2 9 5 2 954 9 5 4 956 956 9 5 6 960 992 998 960 966 968 966 9 6 4 9 6 4 9 6 2 96 0 960 960 9 6 2 9 6 0 9 5 4 950 958 952 960 958 9 5 6 9 5 6 9 5 6 95 6 954 950 94 4 944 944 9 4 6 S 42 ° 4 8 ' 3 2 " E 2 2 4 8 . 4 2 S 00°02'56" W 1333.90 S 8 9 ° 2 9 ' 5 1 " W 4 1 5 . 5 0 N 8 9 ° 4 6 ' 3 0 " W 1 1 9 2 . 9 5 N 0 0 ° 2 9 ' 4 5 " W 2 9 . 7 9 RL S 4 3 0 5 5 RL S 4 3 0 5 5 S 89°42'19" E N 59°16'51" E 112.17 S 82°29'47" E 76.38 S 39°01'14" E 83.15 L=660.19 R=852.53 Δ =4 4°2 2'0 8 " S 7 6 ° 5 5 ' 4 0 " E 17 . 7 5 S 29° 4 2 ' 5 9 " E 70.00 S 18°08'08" W 18.30 L =3 8 1 .8 1 R =8 5 2 .5 3 Δ =2 5 °3 9 '3 7 " S 00°33'15" E 125.02 23 . 3 3 15 0 . 0 0 10 1 9 . 6 2 S 89°42'19" E 60.61 S 45°37'10" E 81.34 S 82°30'21" E 70.95 N 64°05'18" E 87.52 L =9 1 7 .5 1 R =7 0 2 .5 3 Δ =7 4 °4 9 '4 3 " S 00°33'15" E 122.82 SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 16 FOUND RAMSEY COUNTY CAST IRON MONUMENT NO R T H E R T L Y L I N E O F T H E SO U T H 1 3 3 . 0 0 F E E T O F S E C T I O N 1 6 C. S . A . H N O . 9 6 EAST LINE OF SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 16 NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 16 EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 16 NOT MONUMENTED, POSITION BASED ON CERTIFICATE OF LOCATION DATED 9/13/2010 OUTLOT A OUTLOT B 252.88 ACRES 11,015,634 SQ FT C. S . A . H N O . 9 6 SO U T H L I N E O F S O U T H E A S T 1 / 4 O F S E C T I O N 1 6 1 5 0 . 0 0 13 3 . 0 1 N 8 9 ° 2 9 ' 5 2 " E 2 6 2 2 . 3 4 38 8 . 5 0 92 2 . 6 7 RLS 43055 RLS 43055 SHEET 6 SHEET 5 MATCH LINE SH E E T 7 SH E E T 6 MA T C H L I N E CH=643.81 CB=N 5 4°4 4'3 3 "W 1 5 0 . 0 0 S 00°02'56" W 1466.91 (1466.80) (9 0 ° 1 3 ' 3 0 " 1 1 9 2 . 9 6 ) (1 7 9 ° 3 0 ' 1 6 " 3 0 . 0 0 ) NO T T A N G E N T NO T T A N G E N T NOT T A N G E N T TANG E N T NOT RICE C R E E K BLV D . ELEV= 961.07' ELEV= 940.14' EL E V = 9 2 9 . 4 4 ' EL E V = 9 3 3 . 1 2 ' N 8 9 ° 2 9 ' 5 2 " E 2 6 2 2 . 3 4 25.92 AC R E S 1,128,91 2 S Q F T l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l X X X X X X X G- D G- D G-D G-D G- D G- D G- D G- D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D l OEOE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE O E OE O E O E OE OE OE OE OE O E O E O E O E O E O E OE OE OE OE OE O E O E O E O E O E O E O E O E O E O E OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE O E OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE l l l l lllll l l l l l l l l l l l l lll l l l l l l l l l l l V OE OE OE O E O E O E O E OE OE OE OE U E U U U CL V T G E G P P G E E C G H S CH > > C-D C-D C-D C-D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-DC-D C - D C - D C - D C - D C - D C - D C - D C-D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C - D C - D C - D C - D C - D C - D C - D C - D C - D C - D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D E-D E-D E-D E- D G G E E E F E-D OE X X X X X X X X X X X X X O E OE OE OE OE OE OE OE X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XXX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU OU X X X X X X X X X X X D H UUU E E E E M W OE OE O E OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE D D >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> || | | || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || |||||| || || || || || 7533 SUNWOOD DR NW SUITE 206 RAMSEY, MN 55303 (763) 433-2851 ©Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2025, All Rights Reserved RSHEET 6 OF 8 THIS PLAT PREPARED BY R SCALE IN FEET 0 100 200 LEGEND ADJACENT PARCEL LINES RIGHT OF WAY PLAT BOUNDARY LINE DENOTES MONUMENT FOUND, DESCRIPTION INCLUDED ON SURVEY EASEMENT LINE DENOTES 1/2 INCH X 14 INCH IRON MONUMENT SET WITH A PLASTIC CAP MARKED BY LIC. NO. 57991 SECTION LINE PLAT RIGHT OF WAY EXISTING EASEMENT LINE DENOTES FOUND CAST IRON MONUMENT QUARTER LINE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF RICE CREEK COMMONS SECOND ADDITION 900 900 90 490 2 896 896 916 930 92 8 932 928 930 930 9 1 2 91 2 93 6 9 3 4 9 5 6 950 94 4 9 4 4 944 94 4 94 4 9 4 2 942 94 0 934 934 934 9 3 6 936 9 3 6 9 3 0 92 0 922 924 926 912 916 920 922 9 2 4 9 0 2 914 914 91 2 9 1 4 91 6 918 9 1 8 9 1 6 9 0 4 9 1 0 898 910 906 91 2 91 4 914 914 92 6 926 S 01°30'22" E 1737.59 S 24°2 4 ' 2 7 " E 7 5 4 . 6 8 S 42 ° 4 8 ' 3 2 " E 2 2 4 8 . 4 2 EAST LINE OF THE NW1/4 OF SECTION 16 NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 16 NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 16 NO R T H L I N E O F T H E N O R T H E A S T 1 / 4 O F S E C T I O N 1 6 OUTLOT B 252.88 ACRES 11,015,634 SQ FT RLS 43055 RLS 43055 RLS 43 0 5 5 RLS 4 3 0 5 5 SHEET 7 SHEET 4 MATCH LINE SH E E T 7 SH E E T 6 MA T C H L I N E SH E E T 8 SH E E T 7 MA T C H L I N E 1737.59 WET LAND ELEV= 9 3 4 . 0 9 ' ELE V = 9 4 1 . 6 3 ' ELEV= 899.33' NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 16 G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G- D G- D G- D G- D G- D G-DG-D OE OE OE OE OE OEOEOEOEOEOE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE l l l l l l l l l l l l lllllllllll l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l OE OE OE OE OE O E OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE l l l l l l l l l OE O E O E OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE U UU U U E V V U U G CL V T H C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D X X X X X X OE X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XXXXXX X X X X X X X X HH U H D S UUU OE OE O E OE OE OE OE H | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||| || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || 7533 SUNWOOD DR NW SUITE 206 RAMSEY, MN 55303 (763) 433-2851 ©Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2025, All Rights Reserved R THIS PLAT PREPARED BY: SHEET 7 OF 8 R SCALE IN FEET 0 100 200 LEGEND ADJACENT PARCEL LINES RIGHT OF WAY PLAT BOUNDARY LINE DENOTES MONUMENT FOUND, DESCRIPTION INCLUDED ON SURVEY EASEMENT LINE DENOTES 1/2 INCH X 14 INCH IRON MONUMENT SET WITH A PLASTIC CAP MARKED BY LIC. NO. 57991 SECTION LINE PLAT RIGHT OF WAY EXISTING EASEMENT LINE DENOTES FOUND CAST IRON MONUMENT QUARTER LINE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF RICE CREEK COMMONS SECOND ADDITION 9 3 0 90 6 9 1 8 89 4 89 2 8 9 0 8 9 0 8 9 0 8 9 0 900 900 900 9 0 0 896 898 8 9 8 89 6 89889 6 8 9 6 89 8 90 490 2 894 8 9 4 8 9 2 88 8 886 89 2 8 9 2 9 3 4 892 892 896 896 896 894 8 9 4 8 9 6 89 8 898 898 8 9 8 896 9 0 2 91 2 9 1 4 91 6 918 9 1 8 9 1 6 9 0 4 9 1 0 898 910 906 91 2 91 4 8 9 4 8 9 6 89 8 8 9 2 8 9 4 8 9 2 89 0 888 89 0 892 890 894 S 8 3 ° 2 7 ' 0 5 " E 1 7 4 4 . 2 3 465 . 0 0 431 . 1 3 S 01°30'22" E 1737.59 EAST LINE OF THE NW1/4 OF SECTION 16 EAST LINE OF THE SW1/4 OF SECTION 9 NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 16 NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 16 NO R T H L I N E O F T H E N O R T H E A S T 1 / 4 O F S E C T I O N 1 6 NORTH 1/4 OF SECTION 9 FOUND RAMSEY COUNTY CAST IRON MONUMENT RLS 4 3 0 5 5 RLS 4 3 0 5 5 RLS 43055 RLS 43055 SHEET 8 SHEET 2 MATCH LINE SH E E T 8 SH E E T 7 MA T C H L I N E S 2 5 ° 0 5 ' 4 6 " W 8 9 6 . 1 3 121.88 1737.59 WET LAND ZONE A PER FEMA FLOOD PANEL 27123C0010G, WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF 06/04/2010 ELE V = 8 9 7 . 1 6 ' EL E V = 8 9 4 . 6 4 ' ELE V = 8 9 5 . 0 9 ' ELEV= 899.33' G-D G-D G-D G-D G- D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G- D G- D G- D G- D G - D G-DG-DG-DG-DG-DG-DG-DG-DG-DG-DG-DG-DG-DG-DG-DG-DG-DG-D G-D G - D G- D G- D G- D G- D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D G-D OE OE OE OE OE OEOEOEOEOEOE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE U E E CL V T C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-D C-DC-D C-D C-D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C- D C - D C - D C - D C - D C - D X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XXXXX X X X X X X X X 7533 SUNWOOD DR NW SUITE 206 RAMSEY, MN 55303 (763) 433-2851 ©Bolton & Menk, Inc. 2025, All Rights Reserved R THIS PLAT PREPARED BY: SHEET 8 OF 8 R SCALE IN FEET 0 100 200 LEGEND ADJACENT PARCEL LINES RIGHT OF WAY PLAT BOUNDARY LINE DENOTES MONUMENT FOUND, DESCRIPTION INCLUDED ON SURVEY EASEMENT LINE DENOTES 1/2 INCH X 14 INCH IRON MONUMENT SET WITH A PLASTIC CAP MARKED BY LIC. NO. 57991 SECTION LINE PLAT RIGHT OF WAY EXISTING EASEMENT LINE DENOTES FOUND CAST IRON MONUMENT QUARTER LINE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF RICE CREEK COMMONS SECOND ADDITION 7533 SUNWOOD DR NW SUITE 206 RAMSEY, MN 55303 (763) 433-2851R KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That the County of Ramsey, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, owner of the following described property situated in the City of Arden Hills, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota: OUTLOT C, TCAAP, according to the recorded plat thereof, Ramsey County, Minnesota. Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as RICE CREEK COMMONS SECOND ADDITION and does hereby dedicate to the public for the public use forever the public way as shown on this plat. In witness whereof said County of Ramsey, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this ______ day of _______________, 2025. Signed:COUNTY OF RAMSEY By _________________________________ Ling Becker, County Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF _____________ The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___day of _______________, 2025, by Ling Becker, County Manager of the County of Ramsey, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota on behalf of said county. ________________________________________________ (Printed) ________________________________________________ (Signature) Notary Public, _______________County, Minnesota My Commission Expires_______________________ Surveyors Certificate I, Matthew M. Bomstad, Licensed Land Surveyor, do hereby certify that I have surveyed or directly supervised the survey of the property described on this plat; prepared this plat or directly supervised the preparation of this plat; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been correctly set; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of the surveyor's certification are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Dated this ___day of _______________, 2025. _______________________________ Matthew M. Bomstad, Land Surveyor Minnesota Licensed Surveyor No. 57991 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF __________ The foregoing Surveyor’s Certificate by Matthew M. Bomstad, Minnesota License No. 57991, was acknowledged before me this ___day of ________________, 2025 . ________________________________________________ (Printed) ________________________________________________ (Signature) Notary Public,____________________County, Minnesota My Commission Expires____________________________ BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant Joint Development Authority We do hereby certify that on the ______ day of _______________, 2025, the Board of Commissioners of the Joint Powers Board for the Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant Joint Development Authority, approved this plat. Also, the conditions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2, have been fulfilled. _________________________________ Jonathan Wicklund, Chair of Board of Commissioners _________________________________ Ella Mitchell, Administrative Director County Surveyor Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 383A.42, this plat is approved this ____day of____________, 2025. ________________________________ Daniel D. Baar, L.S. Ramsey County Surveyor Property Tax, Records and Election Services Department Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 9, taxes payable in the year 2025 on the land hereinbefore described have been paid. Also, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 272.12, there are no delinquent taxes and transfer entered this ____day of____________, 2025. ________________________________ , Ramsey County Auditor/Treasurer By ________________________________ , Deputy Registrar of Titles, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota I hereby certify that this plat of RICE CREEK COMMONS SECOND ADDITION was filed in the Office of the Register of Titles for public record on this_______day of_____________, 2025, at _______o’clock ___.M., and was duly filed in Book ______ of Plats, Pages ______ through ______, as Document Number ________________________. ____________________________________ Deputy Registrar of Titles THIS PLAT PREPARED BY: RICE CREEK COMMONS SECOND ADDITION SHEET 8 SHEET 7 SHEET 6 SHEET 5 SHEET 4 SHEET 3 INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 35-W INTERSTAT E H I G H W A Y 3 5 - W US T R U N K H I G H W A Y 1 0 C. S . A . H . N O . 9 6 OUTLOT B OUTLOT A RICE C R E E K B L V D . ( C . S . A . H . 1 3 ) R SCALE IN FEET 0 300 600 ADJACENT PARCEL LINES RIGHT OF WAY PLAT BOUNDARY LINE SECTION LINE PLAT PUBLIC WAY QUARTER-SECTION LINE SEC T I O N 9 , T O W N S H I P 30, R A N G E 2 3 SEC T I O N 1 6 , T O W N S H I P 30, R A N G E 2 3 VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE U S H I G H W A Y 1 0 CSAH 96 IN T E R S T A T E H I G H W A Y 3 5 W / U S H I G H W A Y 1 0 C S A H 1 0 CO. RD. H I N T E R S T A T E H I G H W A Y 3 5 W SITE CO. RD. I R NW1 / 4 SW1 / 4 SE1 / 4 NE1 / 4 NW1 / 4 SW1 / 4 SE1 / 4 NE1 / 4 RICE CREEK COMMONS SECOND ADDITION 7533 SUNWOOD DR NW SUITE 206 RAMSEY, MN 55303 (763) 433-2851R THIS PLAT PREPARED BY: 1 INCH = 300 FEET MATCH LINE "F" MA T C H L I N E " A " MATCH LINE "B" MATCH LINE "C" MA T C H L I N E " D " MA T C H L I N E " E " OUTLOT A SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 9 NOT MONUMENTED, POSITION BASED ON WITNESS MONUMENT REFERENCED ON CERTIFICATE OF LOCATION DATED 10/13/2016 L=51 7.4 7 R =7 7 2.0 0 Δ =3 8 °2 4 '1 9 " S 7 1 ° 1 9 ' 1 1 " E 3 2 . 2 5 S 31° 5 5 ' 4 9 " E 62.2 1 S 2 2 ° 0 9 ' 3 4 " W 2 5 . 1 1 L =3 6 7 .6 4 R =7 7 2 .0 0 Δ =2 7 °1 7 '0 8 " S 7 4 ° 1 1 ' 2 6 " E 73 . 2 6 S 8 2 ° 0 5 ' 0 1 " E 2 1 2 . 7 6 N 7 2 ° 4 4 ' 3 1 " E 3 6 3 . 8 8 N 2 6 ° 5 7 ' 4 0 " E 2 2 7 . 7 3 N 4 6 ° 5 1 ' 4 6 " E 3 9 8 . 0 7 N 5 3 ° 4 6 ' 2 1 " E 2 3 2 . 7 9 N 13°32'2 5 " W 6 5 2 . 0 0 N 09°38'08" W 3 0 1 . 4 6 N 09°37'39" W 8 7 8 . 0 2 N 2 9 ° 3 4 ' 0 3 " E 13 6 . 8 0 N 00°01'27" W 82.61 N 15°0 0 ' 5 2 " E 141.00 N 43 ° 2 4 ' 2 3 " W 144 . 8 0 LS 430 5 5 LS 43055 LS 43055 S 36 ° 4 8 ' 0 5 " E 111. 9 4 S 00°59'24" E 76.71 S 4 4 ° 2 4 ' 3 7 " W 9 9 . 0 1 S 00°59'24" E 298.19 L =1 3 0 .1 8 R =1 0 5 5 .7 5 Δ =7 °0 3 '5 3 " S 5 2 ° 5 3 ' 5 3 " E 53. 8 7 S 07°52'06" E 70.00 S 3 7 ° 0 6 ' 0 7 " W 53 . 8 2 S 07°54'00" E 4 1 9 . 7 8 S 4 7 ° 3 5 ' 2 5 " E 112 . 0 8 S 07°54'0 1 " E 71.04 S 31°4 7 ' 4 0 " W 104.24 L=283.48 R=510.00 Δ=31°50'50" 16. 6 9 L =5 3 1 .5 6 R =6 3 2 .0 0 Δ =4 8 °1 1 '2 5 " S 3 9 ° 3 8 ' 4 7 " W 9 9 . 8 0 S 00°59'24" E 75.78 S 37 ° 1 2 ' 2 1 " E 118. 4 8 S 00°59'24" E 285.90 L =1 4 4 .9 5 R =1 1 8 5 .7 5 Δ =7 °0 0 '1 4" S 37°05'59" W 55.16 S 07°54'01" E 70.00 S 5 2 ° 5 3 ' 5 9 " E 55. 1 5 S 07°54'00" E 4 2 6 . 3 2 S 3 8 ° 2 3 ' 3 9 " W 96 . 8 3 S 07°54 ' 0 1 " E 71.77 S 42 ° 2 6 ' 0 6 " E 114 . 6 6 LS 43055 LS 15230 NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 16 WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 9 WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 16 C H =3 6 4 .1 8 C B =N 1 4 °3 4 '3 9 "W C H =5 1 6 .0 3 C B =N 2 4 °4 9 '0 6 "W N 7 4 ° 5 9 ' 0 8 " W 58 . 1 6 1 3 0 . 0 0 1 4 0 . 0 0 13 0 . 0 0 138.87 2.13 AREA DESCRIBED IN RESOLUTION THAT IS NOW INTERSTATE 35 W / US HIGHWAY 10 DOC NO. A04592674 SH E E T 3 SH E E T 4 MA T C H L I N E " A " LS 430 5 5 LS 430 5 5 LS 430 5 5 SHEET 8 SHEET 3 MATCH LINE "F" 1 4 0 . 0 0 CH=279.84 CB=N59°03'43"W C H =1 4 4 .8 6 C B =S 04°2 9 '2 8 "E C H =1 3 0 .0 9 C B =S 04°3 1 '1 6 "E 37 . 7 6 38.88 17 5 . 0 0 3 2 5 . 0 0 MNDOT R/W D I S C WET LAND WET LAND WET LAND WET LAND RICE C R E E K RICE CR E E K RICE C R E E K NOT T A N G E N T NOT T A N G E N T TANG E N T NOT N O T T A N G E N T NOT T A N G E N T TANG E N T NOT RICE C R E E K B L V D . (C.S . A . H . 1 3 ) RICE CREEK BL V D . (C.S.A.H. 13) WET LAND WET LAND WET LAND L S 4 3 0 5 5 NOT TANGENT NOT TANGENT NO T T A N G E N T TAN G E N T N O T N 6 6 ° 2 7 ' 4 3 " E 6 0 5 . 8 0 L S 4 3 0 5 5 LS 43055 LS 43055 OUTLOT B 6 2 2 . 4 9 R SCALE IN FEET 0 100 200 LEGEND DENOTES 1/2 INCH X 14 INCH IRON PIPE TO BE SET WITH A PLASTIC CAP MARKED BY LIC. NO. 57991 ADJACENT PARCEL LINES RIGHT OF WAY PLAT BOUNDARY LINE SECTION LINE PLAT PUBLIC WAY QUARTER-SECTION LINE EDGE OF WET LAND RICE CREEK COMMONS SECOND ADDITION 1 INCH = 100 FEET 7533 SUNWOOD DR NW SUITE 206 RAMSEY, MN 55303 (763) 433-2851R THIS PLAT PREPARED BY: DENOTES 1/2 INCH IRON PIPE FOUND, UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN, DESCRIPTION INCLUDED ON SURVEY DENOTES FOUND CAST IRON MONUMENT DENOTES 1/2 INCH X 14 INCH IRON PIPE SET WITH A PLASTIC CAP MARKED BY LIC. NO. 57991 SET SET SET SET SET SET For the purpose of this plat the South line of the Southwest Quarter, Section 16, Township 30, Range 23, is assumed to bear North 89 degrees 29 minutes 51 seconds East. L =3 8 9 .5 8 R =5 5 8 0 .4 1 Δ =4 °0 0 '0 0 " C H =3 8 9 .5 1 C B =N 3 7 °0 9 '5 1 "W N 35 ° 0 9 ' 5 1 " W 7 7 4 . 7 8 N 13°32'2 5 " W 6 5 2 . 0 0 US A R M Y C O R P S MND O T R / W D I S C MND O T R / W D I S C MND O T MND O T R / W D I S C LS 4 3 0 5 5 S 07°54'0 1 " E 71.04 S 31°4 7 ' 4 0 " W 104.24 S 07°54'01" E 2 9 8 . 7 5 S 60 ° 2 3 ' 3 9 " E 27.5 4 S 1 6 ° 5 0 ' 3 3 " E 60. 0 2 S 26 ° 4 4 ' 2 6 " W 27.5 7 L =2 5 4 .5 5 R =8 0 0 .0 0 Δ =1 8 °1 3 '5 1 " S 38 ° 3 8 ' 2 2 " E 2 8 5 . 3 9 S 8 3 ° 3 8 ' 2 2 " E 29 . 7 0 S 38 ° 3 8 ' 2 2 " E 60.0 0 S 06° 2 1 ' 3 8 " W 29.7 0 S 83 ° 5 9 ' 5 6 " E 2 8 . 1 1 S 38°38'22" E 60.05 S 06°04'03" W 28.43 S 07°54 ' 0 1 " E 71.77 S 42 ° 2 6 ' 0 6 " E 114 . 6 6 S 07°54'01" E 2 9 5 . 6 4 L =5 0 4 .3 1 R =9 4 0 .0 0 Δ =3 0 °4 4 '2 1 " S 38 ° 3 8 ' 2 2 " E 2 8 1 . 3 9 S 06°21'38" W 35.36 S 38 ° 3 8 ' 2 2 " E 60.0 0 S 8 3 ° 3 8 ' 2 2 " E 35 . 3 6 S 38 ° 3 8 ' 2 2 " E 1 2 0 2 . 0 0 43.84 NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 16 OUTLOT A OUTLOT B 51.0 5 1 4 0 . 0 0 1 4 0 . 0 0 1 4 0 . 0 0 WEST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 16 FOUND RAMSEY COUNTY CAST IRON MONUMENT SH E E T 3 SH E E T 4 MA T C H L I N E " A " SHEET 5 SHEET 4 MATCH LINE "B" 2 2 5 . 0 0 L=74.63 R=800.00 Δ=5°20'43" N 13°32'25 " W 6 5 2 . 0 0 WET LAND RICE C R E E K B L V D . (C.S . A . H . 1 3 ) S 38 ° 3 8 ' 2 2 " E 7 2 6 . 9 9 RICE C R E E K B L V D . (C.S . A . H . 1 3 ) R/W D I S C ENG M O N U M E N T . SHEET 8 SHEET 7 SH E E T 8 SH E E T 4 NOT TANGENT NOT TANGE N T N 39 ° 0 9 ' 5 1 " W 1 6 3 0 . 1 3 RICE CREEK COMMONS SECOND ADDITIONRICE CREEK COMMONS SECOND ADDITION 7533 SUNWOOD DR NW SUITE 206 RAMSEY, MN 55303 (763) 433-2851R THIS PLAT PREPARED BY: R SCALE IN FEET 0 100 200 LEGEND DENOTES 1/2 INCH X 14 INCH IRON PIPE TO BE SET WITH A PLASTIC CAP MARKED BY LIC. NO. 57991 ADJACENT PARCEL LINES RIGHT OF WAY PLAT BOUNDARY LINE SECTION LINE PLAT PUBLIC WAY EDGE OF WET LAND 1 INCH = 100 FEET DENOTES FOUND CAST IRON MONUMENT DENOTES 1/2 INCH X 14 INCH IRON PIPE SET WITH A PLASTIC CAP MARKED BY LIC. NO. 57991 QUARTER-SECTION LINE DENOTES 1/2 INCH IRON PIPE FOUND, UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN, DESCRIPTION INCLUDED ON SURVEY SET For the purpose of this plat the South line of the Southwest Quarter, Section 16, Township 30, Range 23, is assumed to bear North 89 degrees 29 minutes 51 seconds East. S 42 ° 4 8 ' 3 2 " E 2 2 4 8 . 4 2 N 8 9 ° 4 6 ' 3 0 " W 1 1 9 2 . 9 5 N 39 ° 0 9 ' 5 1 " W 154 . 8 4 N 5 5 ° 3 1 ' 1 7 " W 3 1 2 . 4 7 N 39 ° 0 9 ' 5 1 " W 3 4 7 . 7 3 N 44 ° 4 3 ' 4 8 " W 5 6 7 . 0 8 LS 4 3 0 5 5 LS 4 3 0 5 5 LS 4 3 0 5 5 LS 4 3 0 5 5 S 83 ° 5 9 ' 5 6 " E 2 8 . 1 1 S 38°38'22" E 60.05 S 06°04'03" W 28.43 S 38 ° 3 8 ' 2 2 " E 3 7 9 . 0 1 S 8 3 ° 3 8 ' 2 2 " E 43 . 8 4 S 38 ° 3 8 ' 2 2 " E 70.0 0 S 06°21'38" W 43.84 S 38 ° 3 8 ' 2 2 " E 1 9 9 . 1 0 L=834.23 R=936.00 Δ=51°03'57" S 89°42'19" E 58.13 N 59°16'5 1 " E 112.17 S 82°29'47" E 76.38 S 39 ° 0 1 ' 1 4 " E 83.1 5 10 1 9 . 6 2 S 38 ° 3 8 ' 2 2 " E 1 2 0 2 . 0 0 S 06°21'38" W 43.84 S 38 ° 3 8 ' 2 2 " E 70.0 0 S 8 3 ° 3 8 ' 2 2 " E 43 . 8 4 S 38 ° 3 8 ' 2 2 " E 1 9 9 . 1 0 L=959.00 R=1076.00 Δ=51°03'57" S 89°42'19" E 60.61 S 45°3 7 ' 1 0 " E 81.34 S 82°30 ' 2 1 " E 70.95 N 64°05'18" E 87.52 WEST LINE OF THE SE1/4 OF SECTION 16 SOUTH 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 16 FOUND RAMSEY COUNTY CAST IRON MONUMENT OUTLOT A OUTLOT B SOUTH LINE OF SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 16 SOUTH LINE OF SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 16 140.00 1 4 0 . 0 0 LS 4 3 0 5 5 SHEET 5 SHEET 4 MATCH LINE "B" SHEET 6 SHEET 5 MATCH LINE "C" NO T NO T T A N G E N T RIC E C R E E K B L V D . (C . S . A . H . 1 3 ) S 38 ° 3 8 ' 2 2 " E 7 2 6 . 9 9 RICE C R E E K B L V D . (C.S . A . H . 1 3 ) 140.00 N 8 9 ° 2 9 ' 5 1 " E 2 6 2 2 . 3 4 51 . 0 0 TA N G E N T N 39 ° 0 9 ' 5 1 " W 1 6 3 0 . 1 3 RICE CREEK COMMONS SECOND ADDITION 7533 SUNWOOD DR NW SUITE 206 RAMSEY, MN 55303 (763) 433-2851R THIS PLAT PREPARED BY: R SCALE IN FEET 0 100 200 LEGEND DENOTES 1/2 INCH X 14 INCH IRON PIPE TO BE SET WITH A PLASTIC CAP MARKED BY LIC. NO. 57991 ADJACENT PARCEL LINES RIGHT OF WAY PLAT BOUNDARY LINE SECTION LINE PLAT PUBLIC WAY QUARTER-SECTION LINE EDGE OF WET LAND 1 INCH = 100 FEET DENOTES FOUND CAST IRON MONUMENT DENOTES 1/2 INCH X 14 INCH IRON PIPE SET WITH A PLASTIC CAP MARKED BY LIC. NO. 57991 DENOTES 1/2 INCH IRON PIPE FOUND, UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN, DESCRIPTION INCLUDED ON SURVEY SET For the purpose of this plat the South line of the Southwest Quarter, Section 16, Township 30, Range 23, is assumed to bear North 89 degrees 29 minutes 51 seconds East. S 42 ° 4 8 ' 3 2 " E 2 2 4 8 . 4 2 S 00°02'56" W 1333.90 S 8 9 ° 2 9 ' 5 1 " W 4 1 5 . 5 0 N 8 9 ° 4 6 ' 3 0 " W 1 1 9 2 . 9 5 N 0 0 ° 2 9 ' 4 5 " W 29 . 7 9 LS 4 3 0 5 5 LS 4 3 0 5 5 N 59°16' 5 1 " E 112.17 S 82°29'47" E 76.38 S 39 ° 0 1 ' 1 4 " E 83.1 5 L=660.19 R=852.53 Δ =4 4°2 2'0 8 " S 7 6 ° 5 5 ' 4 0 " E 17 . 7 5 S 29° 4 2 ' 5 9 " E 70.00 S 18°08'08" W 18.30 L =3 8 1 .8 1 R =8 5 2 .5 3 Δ =2 5 °3 9 '3 7 " S 00°33'15" E 124.86 23.33 15 0 . 0 0 10 1 9 . 6 2 S 45°3 7 ' 1 0 " E 81.34 S 82°30 ' 2 1 " E 70.95 N 64°05'18" E 87.52 L =9 1 7 .5 1 R =7 0 2 .5 3 Δ =7 4 °4 9 '4 3 " S 00°33'15" E 122.82 SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 16 FOUND RAMSEY COUNTY CAST IRON MONUMENT NORTHERLY LINE OF THE SOUTH 133.00 FEET OF SECTION 16 EAST LINE OF SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 16 NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 16 EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 16 NOT MONUMENTED, POSITION BASED ON CERTIFICATE OF LOCATION DATED 9/13/2010 OUTLOT A OUTLOT B SOUTH LINE OF SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 16 1 5 0 . 0 0 13 3 . 0 1 N 8 9 ° 2 9 ' 5 1 " E 2 6 2 2 . 3 4 38 8 . 5 0 LS 430 5 5 LS 430 5 5 SHEET 6 SHEET 5 MATCH LINE "C" SH E E T 7 SH E E T 6 MA T C H L I N E " D " CH=643.81 CB=N 5 4°4 4'3 3"W 1 5 0 . 0 0 S 00°02'56" W 1466.91 NO T NO T T A N G E N T NOT T A N G E N T TANG E N T NOT RICE C R E E K B L V D . (C.S . A . H . 1 3 ) 140.00 (T C A A P 3 8 8 . 5 8 ) 51 . 0 0 51 . 0 0 13 3 . 0 0 TA N G E N T SH E E T 5 RICE CREEK COMMONS SECOND ADDITION 7533 SUNWOOD DR NW SUITE 206 RAMSEY, MN 55303 (763) 433-2851R THIS PLAT PREPARED BY: R SCALE IN FEET 0 100 200 LEGEND DENOTES 1/2 INCH X 14 INCH IRON PIPE TO BE SET WITH A PLASTIC CAP MARKED BY LIC. NO. 57991 ADJACENT PARCEL LINES RIGHT OF WAY PLAT BOUNDARY LINE SECTION LINE PLAT PUBLIC WAY QUARTER-SECTION LINE EDGE OF WET LAND 1 INCH = 100 FEET DENOTES FOUND CAST IRON MONUMENT DENOTES 1/2 INCH X 14 INCH IRON PIPE SET WITH A PLASTIC CAP MARKED BY LIC. NO. 57991 DENOTES 1/2 INCH IRON PIPE FOUND, UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN, DESCRIPTION INCLUDED ON SURVEY SET For the purpose of this plat the South line of the Southwest Quarter, Section 16, Township 30, Range 23, is assumed to bear North 89 degrees 29 minutes 51 seconds East. S 01°30'22" E 1859.47 S 24°2 4 ' 2 7 " E 7 5 4 . 6 8 S 42 ° 4 8 ' 3 2 " E 2 2 4 8 . 4 2 EAST LINE OF THE NW1/4 OF SECTION 16 NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 16 NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 16 NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 16 NO R T H L I N E O F T H E S O U T H E A S T 1 / 4 O F S E C T I O N 1 6 OUTLOT B LS 430 5 5 LS 430 5 5 SHEET 5 SHEET 4 MATCH LINE "B" SH E E T 7 SH E E T 6 MA T C H L I N E " D " SH E E T 8 SH E E T 7 MA T C H L I N E " E " 1737.59 WET LAND SHEET 8 SHEET 7 SH E E T 5 SHEET 8 SHEET 7 RICE CREEK COMMONS SECOND ADDITION 7533 SUNWOOD DR NW SUITE 206 RAMSEY, MN 55303 (763) 433-2851R THIS PLAT PREPARED BY: R SCALE IN FEET 0 100 200 LEGEND DENOTES 1/2 INCH X 14 INCH IRON PIPE TO BE SET WITH A PLASTIC CAP MARKED BY LIC. NO. 57991 ADJACENT PARCEL LINES RIGHT OF WAY PLAT BOUNDARY LINE SECTION LINE PLAT PUBLIC WAY QUARTER-SECTION LINE EDGE OF WET LAND 1 INCH = 100 FEET DENOTES FOUND CAST IRON MONUMENT DENOTES 1/2 INCH X 14 INCH IRON PIPE SET WITH A PLASTIC CAP MARKED BY LIC. NO. 57991 DENOTES 1/2 INCH IRON PIPE FOUND, UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN, DESCRIPTION INCLUDED ON SURVEY SET For the purpose of this plat the South line of the Southwest Quarter, Section 16, Township 30, Range 23, is assumed to bear North 89 degrees 29 minutes 51 seconds East. N 5 3 ° 4 6 ' 2 1 " E 2 3 2 . 7 9 S 8 3 ° 2 7 ' 0 5 " E 1 7 4 4 . 2 3 465 . 0 0 431 . 1 3 S 01°30'22" E 1859.47 LS 430 5 5 EAST LINE OF THE NW1/4 OF SECTION 16 EAST LINE OF THE SW1/4 OF SECTION 9 NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 16 NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 16 NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 16 OUTLOT B NORTH 1/4 OF SECTION 9 FOUND GRANITE MONUMENT WITHIN A CAST IRON MANHOLE ASSEMBLY LS 430 5 5 LS 430 5 5 LS 430 5 5 LS 430 5 5 SHEET 8 SHEET 3 MATCH LINE "F" SH E E T 8 SH E E T 7 MA T C H L I N E " E " S 2 5 ° 0 5 ' 4 6 " W 8 9 6 . 1 3 121.88 1737.59 WET LAND OUTLOT B SHEET 8 SHEET 7 RICE CREEK COMMONS SECOND ADDITION 7533 SUNWOOD DR NW SUITE 206 RAMSEY, MN 55303 (763) 433-2851R THIS PLAT PREPARED BY: R SCALE IN FEET 0 100 200 LEGEND DENOTES 1/2 INCH X 14 INCH IRON PIPE TO BE SET WITH A PLASTIC CAP MARKED BY LIC. NO. 57991 ADJACENT PARCEL LINES RIGHT OF WAY PLAT BOUNDARY LINE SECTION LINE PLAT PUBLIC WAY QUARTER-SECTION LINE EDGE OF WET LAND 1 INCH = 100 FEET DENOTES FOUND CAST IRON MONUMENT DENOTES 1/2 INCH X 14 INCH IRON PIPE SET WITH A PLASTIC CAP MARKED BY LIC. NO. 57991 DENOTES 1/2 INCH IRON PIPE FOUND, UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN, DESCRIPTION INCLUDED ON SURVEY SET SE T For the purpose of this plat the South line of the Southwest Quarter, Section 16, Township 30, Range 23, is assumed to bear North 89 degrees 29 minutes 51 seconds East. P:\Planning\Planning Cases\_JDA\JDA PC 25-003 - TCAAP California Parcel - PP and FP\Comments\City Engineering Comments 090225.docx 12224 Nicollet Avenue Burnsville, MN 55337 Phone: (952) 890-0509 Bolton-Menk.com Date: 9/2/2025 To: David Swearingen, PE From: Jason Malecha, PE Cc: Brad Fisher, PE Eric Wilfahrt RE: Rice Creek Commons Second Addition Preliminary and Final Plat Review City of Arden Hills, MN BMI Project No.: 25X.140489.000 This memo summarizes the review of the preliminary and final plat documents received on August 18, 2025. Preliminary Plat 1. Use a right-of-way line type for all existing right-of-way to help differentiate between parcel lines on all Sheets. 2. On Sheet 1, label Sheet 2 3. On Sheet 1, label match lines. 4. On Sheets 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8, include in the legend, if not separately labeled on the graphic, all feature symbols, feature line types, utility lines, buildings, etc. 5. On Sheets 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8, label all concrete surfaces, bituminous surfaces, trails, etc. 6. On Sheet 1, Sheet 2 and Sheet 6, include in parenthesis C.S.A.H. 13 along with the name of Rice Creek Blvd. 7. Label the widths of all adjoining existing right-of-way, if width varies, indicate so. 8. On Sheet 1, Sheet 2 and Sheet 3, label the existing right-of-way of C.S.A.H. 13 in the plat of RICE CREEK COMMONS, with solid lettering. 9. On Sheet 1, Sheet 2 and Sheet 3, label the area north of and adjoining Outlot B, TCAAP as County Road H in solid lettering. 10. On Sheet 2 and Sheet 3, changed the stippled lettering of County Road H to solid lettering. 11. On Sheets 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8, add the edge of water line type and note in the legends, as it is shown on Sheet 1. 12. Differentiate between the dashed and the dashed with dot line types shown on the graphic portion of each sheet, either with label, add to the legend, or remove if erroneous. 13. Provide a dated and signed version. Name: David Swearingen Date: 9/2/2025 Page: 2 P:\Planning\Planning Cases\_JDA\JDA PC 25-003 - TCAAP California Parcel - PP and FP\Comments\City Engineering Comments 090225.docx 14. On Sheet 1, the total plat area doesn’t include the proposed Rice Creek Boulevard (C.S.A.H. 13) right-of-way area. Please include and also on Sheets 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, add the square footage and acreage next to the road name. 15. Identify by name and PID No., all adjoining unsubdivided and subdivide land. 16. Show all connections of utility lines between their respective structures/features (i.e., sanitary sewer, storm sewer, water, gas, electric, communication, etc.) 17. Ensure City owned utilities have required easements if not located within the proposed right-of- way boundary. 18. Either show proposed site design features or provide civil plans showing site design. Final Plat 1. Use a right-of-way line type for all existing right-of-way to help differentiate between parcel lines on all Sheets. 2. Label the widths of all adjoining existing right-of-way, if width varies, indicate so. 3. On Sheet 3, label with stippled lettering County State Aid Highway No. 13. 4. On Sheet 3, label with stippled lettering, the area north of and adjoining Outlot B, TCAAP as County Road H. 5. On Sheet 7, label the long narrow wet land. Jessica Jagoe City Administrator City of Arden Hills 1245 West Highway 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112 Dear Ms. Jagoe Ramsey County has received comments on our Preliminary and Final Plat application for the Rice Creek Commons Spine Road application. The following are the County’s responses to comments received from the reviewing agencies: MnDOT: Water Resources - A MnDOT drainage permit will be required before development occurs. The permit applicant shall demonstrate that the off-site runoff entering MnDOT drainage system(s) and/or right of way will not increase. The drainage permit application, including the information below, should be submitted online to: https://olpa.dot.state.mn.us/OLPA/. Please upload this letter with the drainage permit application. County understands the Drainage Permit requirement. - The following information must be submitted with the drainage permit application: 1. Grading plans, drainage plans, and hydraulic calculations demonstrating that proposed flows to MnDOT right of way remain the same as existing conditions or are reduced. County understands this requirement. 2. Existing and proposed drainage area maps with flow arrows and labeling that corresponds with the submitted calculations. County understands this requirement. 3. Hydro CAD model and PDF of output for the 2, 10, and 100-year Atlas 14 storm events. County understands this requirement. Once a drainage permit application is submitted, a thorough review will be completed, and additional information may be requested. Please contact Jason Swenson, Water Resources Engineering, at jason.swenson@state.mn.us or 651-234-7539 with any questions. County understands this requirement. Transit - This project will have impacts to Metro Transit Route 250 and could change the ridership in that area. Route 250 uses the CR H/Thumb Rd roundabout, so this project will require coordination with Metro Transit prior to and during construction. County will review plans with Met Transit and review Route 250 for Met Transit concerns. - Please contact Amrish Patel, Transit Advantages Coordinator, at amrish.patel@state.mn.us or 651-234- 7949, with any questions. County understands this requirement. Permits - Any work that affects MnDOT right of way will require an appropriate permit. All permits are available and must be applied at: https://olpa.dot.state.mn.us/OLPA/. Upload this letter when applying for permits. County understands this requirement - For questions regarding permit submittal requirements, please contact Buck Craig of MnDOT’s Metro District Permits Section at buck.craig@state.mn.us or 651-775-0405. County understands this requirement. Review Submittal Options - MnDOT’s goal is to complete reviews within 30 calendar days. Review materials received electronically can be processed more rapidly. Do not submit files via a cloud service or SharePoint link. In order of preference, review materials may be submitted as: 1. Email documents and plans to metrodevreviews.dot@state.mn.us. Attachments may not exceed 20 MB (megabytes) per email. Documents can be zipped as well. If multiple emails are necessary, number each email. County understands this requirement. 2. Files over 20 MB can also be uploaded to MnDOT’s Web Transfer Client site: https://mft.dot.state.mn.us. Contact metrodevreviews.dot@state.mn.us, and staff will create a shared folder in which files can be uploaded to. Please send an accompanying email with a narrative for the development. County understands this requirement. Rice Creek Watershed District - This area includes a portion of the Rice Creek Water Trail, which is heavily used. Please consider this usage when designing the roadway crossing so that it is not dangerous or inaccessible for paddlers. County will include this request in our design package, and review with Watershed at the 90% complete level. - A sign at the bridge indicating “Rice Creek” would be nice! County will include this signage in the final design plans. - Rice Creek approved the Rice Creek Commons Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan (CSMP) in 2015 and was last updated in 2016. The CSMP provides an alternative means for meeting the water quality treatment and peak rate runoff control requirements of the RCWD stormwater management rule. The plan essentially envisions two stages of development, the interim condition where the spine road and associated infrastructure is constructed and then the full build-out condition. Will the associated stormwater and wetland mitigation areas be further platted into outlots as development occurs, or will they be part of private property and placed under easement? County will discuss this with the JDA at the time of future subdivision. Ownership and maintenance responsibilities of subsequent stormwater facilities will likely be determined as part of a Developers’ Agreement with subsequent developers. - As part of the County Road H roundabout construction, portions of Rice Creek were re- meandered in 2015 to facilitate the improvements. This project included wetland mitigation along Rice Creek which has been protected with a Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants. Please ensure that the plat will not affect the mitigation area. Subject to Document Number 4585028, Outlot B - TCAAP remains protected under the Wetland Conservation Act Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants. The proposed final plat shows Outlot B - TCAAP as unaltered and outside of the proposed plat. Future subdivision of Rice Creek Commons 2nd Addition cannot include Outlot B of the TCAAP Plat as it is outside the 2nd Addition’s’ boundary. City of Arden Hills Final Plat 1. Use a right-of-way line type for all existing right-of-way to help differentiate between parcel lines on all Sheets. 505.021, Sub.6 requires adjacent RW lines to be dashed and they are currently shown as dashed. This only appears to be a concern on page 3. Most of the dashed lines represent different underlying parcels within the right of way as a result of multiple acquisitions over time (typically shown as lighter dashed lines). The RW along the edge of Outlot B could be shown either as a parcel line or RW as it is both. 2. Label the widths of all adjoining existing right-of-way, if width varies, indicate so. This only seems to be a concern on page 3 as the dimensions or the phrase “width varies” exist on all other sheets. 505.021, Sub. 6 requires the width to be shown only “if known.” This portion of 35W is so wide and crosses into the next section to the west that we really don’t know the width at any given point. Also, the width varies label is not on the underlying plat of TCAAP in this location either. We can write “width varies” with a pen manually on the mylar if this is absolutely needed. 3. On Sheet 3, label with stippled lettering County State Aid Highway No. 13. 505.021, Sub. 6 requires the names of roadways that are “adjacent” to the plat boundary to be shown. There is a section of County Road H, referred to in comment 4, that is in between CSAH 13 and the plat boundary. Might be nice for reference but not needed. 4. On Sheet 3, label with stippled lettering, the area north of and adjoining Outlot B, TCAAP as County Road H. 505.021, Sub. 6 requires the names of roadways that are “adjacent” to the plat boundary to be shown. Currently, the plat does not label the adjacent roadway. We suggest adding a leader (shown in red below) on the mylar copies with a pen. The recorder will allow this. 5. On Sheet 7, label the long narrow wet land. 505.021, Sub. 8 requires wetlands to be shown with a dashed line, which they are. Also, the legend on the same page indicates what the dashed line means. We can write “wet land” with a pen manually on the mylar if this is absolutely needed. Please let me know if there are any further questions. JOHN R. MAZZITELLO, PE, PMP, MBA Deputy Director of Public Works Ramsey County, Minnesota CC: Larina Dewalt, Ramsey County CED Ella Mitchell, Ramsey County CED Dan Barr, Ramsey County Surveyor CITY OF ARDEN HILLS COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA JOINT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY RESOLUTION NO. 2025-002 RESOLUTION APPROVING A PRELIMINARY PLAT AND FINAL PLAT AT RICE CREEK COMMONS SECOND ADDITION WHEREAS, Applicant seeks to dedicate public right-of-way within a portion of the Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant site, also knowns as Rice Creek Commons, originally designated as TCAAP Outlot C (“Subject Property”), for delineation of area necessary for City and County public improvements associated with the Spine Road (the “Project”); and WHEREAS, TCAAP Outlot C is a 372.04 Acre Parcel in Rice Creek Commons, also known as and identified as the California Parcel on the Master Plan Land Use Map (“Plan Area”); and WHEREAS, the Applicant seeks to create two outlots that would be further subdivided and replatted at the time of future development in accordance with the TCAAP Redevelopment Code (the “TRC"); and WHEREAS, Arden Hills City Staff, working as JDA Development Staff on behalf of the Joint Development Authority (the “JDA”) received a land use application for the Subject Property for a Preliminary and Final Plat Approval on August 15, 2025 (the “Application”); and WHEREAS, the Application includes requests for Preliminary Plat and Final Plat in accordance with the TRC, and is not seeking any Permitted Adjustments; and WHEREAS, Section 3.5, Plat Approval of the TRC incorporates by reference the requirements Chapter 11 of the Arden Hills Code (AHC) for purposes of plat approval design review and such approval is subject to the requirements of the TRC standards for public infrastructure; and WHEREAS, Section 3.6, Hearing Requirements of the TRC requires the JDA conduct public hearings for consideration of all development applications for the Plan Area; and WHEREAS, the JDA Development staff have issued a report and recommendation on Preliminary Plat and Final Plat which includes the determination that the Application for the Subject Property meets the standards of the TRC (the “Report”) which is incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, public notice of this hearing on the Preliminary Plat and Final Plat was issued in the official newspaper of the City of Arden Hills at least ten (10) days prior to the public hearing and mailed to all property owners within 1000 feet of the Subject Property; and WHEREAS, the JDA’s obligation to conduct a public hearing has been met where the Joint Development Authority duly held a public hearing on September 9, 2025. All persons present at said meeting were given an opportunity to be heard and present written statements; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE JOINT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY: Approves the application for Preliminary and Final Plat Approval for the Subject Property, as defined herein, based on JDA Development staff report, and subject to the following condition: 1. The Applicant shall record the Final Plat with Ramsey County within sixty (60) days of the JDA’s approval and a copy of the recorded plat shall be provided to the City. 2. All items identified in the September 2, 2025, City PW/Engineering Division memo shall be addressed prior to the recording of the Final Plat. All comments shall be adopted herein by reference. ADOPTED BY THE JOINT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THIS 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025. JDA Chair ATTEST: JDA Administrative Director Joint Development Authority TCAAP Redevelopment Project Joint Development Authority TCAAP Redevelopment Project AGENDA ITEM 8a MEMORANDUM DATE: September 9, 2025 TO: Joint Development Authority Board of Commissioners FROM: Director Mitchell and Rick Carter, LHB SUBJECT: Approve Revised Sustainability Design Guidelines At the August JDA work session, the JDA reviewed updates from the Energy Advisory Committee and consultants, including proposed revisions to the Sustainability Design Guidelines. These revisions clarify language and requirements around electric vehicle chargers. Attachment: Sustainability Design Guidelines – revised 9/5/2025 Action Requested: Approve Sustainability Design Guidelines as revised Updated 9/5/2025 Rice Creek Commons Sustainability Design Guidelines Revised: September 5, 2025 1. Purpose. The purpose of the Sustainability Design Guidelines (SDG) is to advance the TCAAP Joint Development Authority’s (JDA’s) mission to advance sustainable development, reduce energy use and carbon dioxide emissions, and thereby mitigate the impacts of climate change from the Rice Creek Commons development. These guidelines establish the sustainability standards for development on the site and serve to implement the Green Energy Vision and Clean Energy Policy, which has the goal of an all-electric, carbon-free development. These guidelines also support the JDA’s pursuit of LEED for Communities (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design v4.1 for Communities: Plan + Design) certification. It is the goal of the JDA that each building and parcel in Rice Creek Commons shall comply with the SDG. The JDA will apply these guidelines within the Rice Creek Commons development through Development Agreements that are subject to JDA approval 2. Guidelines 2.1. Sustainability Certification. Each building and tenant improvement shall achieve LEED BD+C New Construction certification at the silver level or above using the newest version available at the time of registration. The LEED boundary for each improved parcel of land within the Development shall be the same as the boundary of that parcel. Other certification systems will be considered for one- to four-unit residential buildings, including the DOE’s Zero Energy Ready Home (ZERH) program and Phius Passive House standards. 2.2. Building Decarbonization. 2.2.1. Energy Efficiency. All buildings and tenant improvements shall achieve: 50% better energy efficiency than the applicable Minnesota Energy Code, certification from the DOE’s Zero Energy Ready Home (ZERH) program, or Phius CORE certification as a Passive House. 2.2.2. Electrification. Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, all buildings shall be all- electric and shall not use any fossil fuels. Any waivers of this provision will be restricted to systems or devices for which an equivalent all-electric system or design is unavailable, impractical, or is determined to present an equity gap, as reasonably determined by JDA. In the event of a waiver, buildings the JDA allows to use any fossil fuels must offset an equivalent amount of carbon emissions each year. 2.2.3. Renewable Energy. All buildings in the Development must install photovoltaic (PV) systems that either: 2.2.3.1. generate, on an annual basis, enough electricity to meet one hundred twenty percent (120%) of the building's anticipated energy use; or 2.2.3.2. include a rooftop array with a rated capacity of not less than 10.75 watts per gross square foot of roof area and a covered parking array for all parking lots containing twenty or more parking spaces -- including the top level of multi-level parking structures – with a rated capacity of not less than 7.5 watts per gross square foot of parking area. Updated 9/5/2025 All panels used in PV systems must be rated as Tier 1 panels and, if applicable, qualify under the Inflation Reduction Act for the Investment Tax Credit. Any renewable energy certificates (RECs) generated from PV systems in the Development shall be credited to the Development as a whole. Additionally, all purchased electricity must come from a green power purchase program and include bundled RECs. 2.3. District Energy. If a District Energy System is available, all buildings shall connect to the District Energy System for heating and cooling. 2.4. Embodied Carbon. Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, all buildings shall conduct a whole building life-cycle assessment and achieve at least a 10% reduction in global warming potential, using the calculation methods established in LEED BD+C: New Construction. This Section does not apply to single family homes or tenant improvements within commercial buildings. 2.5. Electric Vehicle Infrastructure. The Development shall include infrastructure to support electric vehicles (EV) – as defined by the International Building Code – as follows: 2.5.1. Provide electric vehicle supply equipment (EVSE) in a minimum of two percent (2%) of all public parking spaces. Clearly identify and reserve these spaces for the sole use by plug-in electric vehicles. 2.5.2. For non-residential parcels where four or more vehicle parking spaces are provided, not less than 4% of the total number of parking spaces or not less than 8% of designated employee- only parking spaces shall be EV-ready spaces or EV-installed spaces. Not less than 30% of the total number of parking spaces shall be EV-capable spaces, EV-ready spaces, or EV- installed spaces. 2.5.3. For residential parcels, not less than 20% of the total number of parking spaces shall be EV- ready spaces or EV-installed spaces. Not less than 75% of the total number of parking spaces shall be EV-capable spaces, EV-ready spaces, or EV-installed spaces. 2.5.4. All EVSE shall meet the following requirements: Provide a Level 2 charging capacity (208- 240 volts) or greater. Comply with the relevant regional standard for electrical connectors, such as: SAE Surface Vehicle Recommended Practice J1772. Be capable of responding to time-of-use market signals (e.g., price). 2.5.5. Terminology guidance: Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment (EVSE): The conductors, including the ungrounded, grounded and equipment grounding conductors, and the EV connectors, attachment plugs, and all other fittings, devices, power outlets, or apparatuses installed specifically for the purpose of transferring energy between the premises wiring and the EV. 2.5.5.1. EV-installed: A designated parking space that has all the infrastructure and a charging station to charge an electric vehicle on the day the building permit is approved. The EVSE shall be Level 2 or greater. 2.5.5.2. EV-ready: A designated parking space which is provided with a minimum 40-amp, 208/240-volt, dedicated branch circuit for future dedicated Level 2 EVSE servicing EVs. The circuit shall terminate in a suitable point such as a receptacle, junction box, or an Updated 9/5/2025 EVSE, and be near the proposed location of the EV parking spaces. The circuit shall have no other outlets. The service panel shall include an over-current protective device and provide sufficient capacity and space to accommodate the circuit and over- current protective device and be near the proposed location of the EV parking spaces. For two adjacent EV-capable spaces, a single branch circuit is permitted. 2.5.5.3. EV-capable: A dedicated parking space which is provided with electrical panel capacity and space to support a minimum 40-amp, 208/240-volt branch circuit for each EV parking space, and the installation of raceways, both underground and surface mounted, to support the EVSE. For two adjacent EV-capable spaces, a single branch circuit is permitted. 1.1. Reporting. On an annual basis, all owners shall report monthly whole-building energy consumption, on-site energy generation, electrical demand, and water use to Energy Star Portfolio Manager and ensure this information is accessible to the JDA. Owners shall provide other building data upon the reasonable request of JDA. 2. Implementation and Compliance. Developers will comply with these guidelines by following the below approval and documentation processes concurrent with all other JDA review processes. 2.1. Approval Process. 2.1.1. Developer reviews Sustainability Design Guidelines and participates in kickoff meeting with sustainability consultant (LHB). Developer also participates in Energy Design Assistance (EDA) Program, a free energy consulting service, to understand energy efficiency options for their development and develop a whole building energy model (single-family homes exempted from EDA program). 2.1.2. Following the kickoff meeting and additional meetings as necessary, sustainability consultant provides summary memo of SDG compliance measures. 2.1.3. Upon agreement of the Developer and staff regarding compliance with the guidelines, or upon agreement with the JDA regarding the terms of a waiver, Staff incorporates SDG compliance measures into Development Agreement between JDA and Developer. 2.2. Waivers. If the Developer determines they cannot adhere to all items in the SDG, Developer must complete the Waiver Request Process. The measures in these guidelines may be modified for individual developments for reasons of hardship. Alternative strategies that show demonstrable and quantifiable progress towards the Green Energy Vision may be considered as alternative compliance. Developers will go through the following process to request waivers to the SDG. 2.2.1. Developer completes waiver request form, including justification for requested waivers. 2.2.2. Sustainability consultant reviews waiver request form and prepares memo for staff who will make a recommendation to the JDA. This memo includes discussion of the impacts of requested waivers on JDA sustainability goals, such as greenhouse gas emissions and LEED for Communities certification, and the reasonableness of the waiver request. Updated 9/5/2025 2.2.3. JDA reviews waiver request memo and approves, disapproves, or otherwise provides direction to the Developer on waivers and/or alternative acceptable SDG compliance measures. Developer may present to JDA on sustainability plans and waiver request. 2.2.4. Sustainability consultant incorporates acceptable SDG compliance measures into summary memo, for staff to incorporate into Development Agreement. 2.3. Documentation. Developers will work with consultants and staff to submit documentation of SDG compliance. 2.3.1. Sustainability Certification 2.3.1.1. Proof of registration with LEED (or other accepted certification). 2.3.1.2. Checklist of the planned certification credits to be achieved. 2.3.1.3. Within one year of building occupancy, provide documentation reporting the certification level and credits achieved. 2.3.2. Energy Efficiency 2.3.2.1. All buildings and tenant improvements: energy model report showing achievement of 50% better efficiency than the applicable Minnesota Energy Code, certification from the DOE’s Zero Energy Ready Home (ZERH) program, or Phius CORE certification as a Passive House. 2.3.3. Electrification 2.3.3.1. Mechanical plans documenting that buildings are all-electric. 2.3.3.2. If granted a waiver to use gas service, documentation showing offset of an equivalent amount of carbon emissions from offsite sources. 2.3.4. Renewable Energy 2.3.4.1. PV system specifications showing that panels meet requirements of Section 2.2.3. 2.3.4.2. PV system sizing documentation indicating that system will generate enough electricity to meet requirements of Section 2.2.3. 2.3.5. District Energy 2.3.5.1. Mechanical plans documenting that buildings will be connected to a District Energy System for heating and cooling, if provided by Declarant, its affiliates, or other unrelated third parties. 2.3.6. Embodied Carbon 2.3.6.1. All buildings (except tenant improvements and detached single family residential) shall provide documentation for LEED MR Credit: Reduce Embodied Carbon indicating Updated 9/5/2025 achievement of at least 2 points. 2.3.7. Electric Vehicle Infrastructure 2.3.7.1. For each parking area, provide a site plan indicating the total number of parking spaces and number achieving the EV infrastructure requirements of Section 2.5. 2.3.8. Reporting 2.3.8.1. Upon building occupancy, set up Energy Star Portfolio Manager to enable sharing with the Declarant. 2.3.8.2. Annually, report monthly whole-building energy consumption, on-site energy generation, electrical demand, and water use to Energy Star Portfolio Manager. Joint Development Authority TCAAP Redevelopment Project Joint Development Authority TCAAP Redevelopment Project AGENDA ITEM 8b MEMORANDUM DATE: September 9, 2025 TO: Joint Development Authority Board of Commissioners FROM: Directors Mitchell and Jagoe SUBJECT: Review Draft Request for Information A Request for Information (RFI) has been drafted for JDA review and approval. As stated in the RFI document, its purpose is to gain information to inform a future solicitation for development at Rice Creek Commons. The Anticipated Timeline section is not yet filled in as the timing may vary depending on the need for revisions or additional promotion. Staff will distribute the RFI through channels including but not limited to DemandStar, the Rice Creek Commons newsletter, and RiceCreekCommons.com. Attachment: Draft Request for Information Requested Action: Approve the Request for Information 1 Rice Creek Commons Request for Information (RFI) Table of Contents Introduction and Purpose .............................................................................................. 1 Site Location and Background ........................................................................................ 2 TCAAP Joint Development Authority (JDA) ....................................................................... 3 Planning Documents ..................................................................................................... 3 Sustainability and Clean Energy ..................................................................................... 5 Environmental History, Remediation and Current Status .................................................. 6 Site Infrastructure ......................................................................................................... 7 Existing conditions ........................................................................................................ 7 Current Development and Planning Status ...................................................................... 8 Supporting Documents and Webpages ........................................................................... 9 Request for Information (RFI) ......................................................................................... 9 Anticipated Schedule .................................................................................................. 10 Introduction and Purpose The Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant (TCAAP) Joint Development Authority (JDA) is seeking information from responders with knowledge, ability, and experience in real estate development and related industries to guide a future solicitation for further development at Rice Creek Commons (RCC). The City of Arden Hills (City) and Ramsey County (County) are working together through the JDA to advance the development of the property, building on the existing vision for development and planning documents. This Request for Information (RFI) is solely informational. Responders will be notified of any future competitive solicitation(s) for development. 2 Site Location and Background Rice Creek Commons (RCC) is located in Arden Hills, Minnesota, immediately east of Interstate 35W. The property is bound by County Road H and Rice Creek Regional Park on the north and by U.S. Highway 10 and County Road 96 on the south. RCC is conveniently located 10 freeway miles away from both downtown Minneapolis and downtown Saint Paul. The former Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant (TCAAP) property once comprised over 2,300 acres of land in the City of Arden Hills used by the federal government for the manufacture of small arms ammunition during World War II. The TCAAP Site ceased manufacturing operations in 1976 and was largely decommissioned in the 1980’s. In 2013, Ramsey County purchased 427 acres of TCAAP property from the federal government to remediate, redevelop and reestablish the property as the economic engine it once was – this time with homes, businesses and retail. This portion of the former TCAAP property was then renamed Rice Creek Commons. The site is divided into two major parcels that are commonly referred to as the California Parcel (shown in green) and the Thumb Parcel or Outlot A (shown in red). The California Parcel is the primary Rice Creek Commons redevelopment area and is the focus of this RFI. It is a 372-acre parcel of land, roughly in the shape of the State of California, zoned for a broad range of land uses. The Thumb Parcel, also known as Outlot A, is a 40-acre parcel zoned for commercial/industrial use to the north of the main site. It is currently partially under development and contract. Outlot A is not the topic of this RFI. 3 TCAAP Joint Development Authority (JDA) The TCAAP Joint Development Authority (JDA) is chaired by a resident of the City of Arden Hills and consists of two elected officials each from the City of Arden Hills and Ramsey County. The JDA’s purpose is joint governance of economic development and redevelopment of the Rice Creek Commons property. The JDA reviews all development proposals for conformity with the TCAAP Redevelopment Code and Regulating Plan and has limited land use authority for such proposals. On February 6, 2023, the JDA adopted the following vision statement for Rice Creek Commons: The Joint Development Authority’s (JDA) vision for the Rice Creek Commons site is to create economic prosperity, build an inclusive economy, have a long-term sustainable development, and develop an energy forward community by providing much-needed housing at a variety of income levels – including affordable housing – and creating well-paying jobs. In addition to a vision for the site, key policy goals have been identified as development priorities. • At least 20% of the total housing units will be affordable at 60% area median income (AMI) or below. • At least 10% of the total for-sale housing units will be eligible for Ramsey County down payment assistance program (as of 2025, that means a maximum purchase price of $372,600). • Job creation is a key goal of the development. • Ramsey County’s prevailing wage ordinance will apply to development on the site. Planning Documents The Rice Creek Commons planning documents lay out a vision for the site that takes advantage of its location, builds on its assets, and introduces an exciting mix of new development. The primary planning documents are the TCAAP Redevelopment Code (TRC) and the TCAAP Regulating Plan. The City of Arden Hills 2040 Comprehensive Plan also includes important information related to Rice Creek Commons. These documents were created and amended based on public engagement over the course of many years. Rice Creek Commons will be a cohesive mix of residential and commercial neighborhoods surrounding a town center; a unique community where people can live, work and play. 4 Considering land designated for infrastructure, trails, and open space, Rice Creek Commons has approximately 300 acres of land planned for commercial and residential development. The site will feature four distinct neighborhoods with a wide range of housing types, ensuring that Rice Creek Commons will be a place for people in all walks of life. The Hill, Creek, and Southwest neighborhoods will be primarily residential, offering a mix of single- family homes, townhomes, and other housing options. The Town Center neighborhood, at the heart of Rice Creek Commons, will provide a walkable retail center with multifamily housing, public space, and commercial uses. The entire site will be connected by an internal network of parks and trails that will not only provide open space for all types of recreation but also perform important environmental functions such as stormwater management and natural habitat restoration. Open space throughout the site will connect to a larger regional system, with miles of linked trails, making active living easily accessible for future residents. The vision for the site includes the following land uses (see TCAAP Regulating Plan for full land use map): • Town center: The Town Center neighborhood is centered on approximately 17 acres of land that is envisioned to be a vibrant commercial and residential district that promotes walkability through its street design and mix of uses. Zoning for Town Center includes housing, office, retail, restaurant, and civic uses. Within this district, buildings can be up to five stories in some areas and up to 10 stories in others. • Neighborhood residential: Three distinct residential neighborhoods are planned. The Creek and Hill neighborhoods together consist of 118 acres of land zoned for low-density residential uses, such as single-family houses. The Southwest and Town Center North and South neighborhoods include about 60 acres of land zoned for low- to medium-density residential uses, such as townhouses or similar. • Mixed-use retail: This land use is concentrated in 28 acres of retail development at the northern gateway to the site served by an off-ramp from 35W. Additional areas for this land use are located at the southern entrance to the site and in the Town Center area. • Office Mixed Use: This land use allows for 20 acres of office space in buildings that can be built as high as five stories. • Flex business: Approximately 10 acres on the west-central portion of the site are zoned for flex business, which allows for office, technology and manufacturing uses. 5 The TRC does not allow businesses that primarily provide warehousing and distribution. The focus of this land use is to provide employment opportunities. • Parks, trails, and green space: Approximately 25 acres is reserved for parks and open space, spread throughout the development. There will be pedestrian and bicycle facilities in the neighborhoods, and a paved trail is planned to extend along the eastern edge of the site and will connect to the broader regional trail network. There are also plans for the surrounding area that will relate to RCC. In 2020, Ramsey County Parks & Recreation amended the Rice Creek North Regional Trail Master Plan which includes plans to build a bike and pedestrian trail and trailhead facility with all-season activities on 112 acres adjacent to RCC. With these facilities, RCC will connect to a regional system of over 240 miles of trails through the Twin Cities. Sustainability and Clean Energy Since its inception, the JDA has laid the groundwork for RCC to be a national model for innovative, sustainable development with a goal to be all-electric and carbon-free. The JDA created an Energy Advisory Committee to guide this work and adopted the following vision and guiding principles: Rice Creek Commons Energy Vision: Rice Creek Commons will be a vibrant and unique, climate-forward development that aligns with the goals outlined in the State of Minnesota’s Climate Action Framework: carbon neutrality, clean energy, climate resiliency, equity and innovation. Rice Creek Commons will attract investment and partnership that will create sustainable benefits for the community. Guiding Principles: • Develop a resilient community for energy and other utilities using clean energy technologies, reducing consumption, and reusing local resources onsite. • Implement infrastructure solutions that are flexible and scalable over 50 years, including developing the site to be adaptable to future technological needs. • Deliver a model of efficient energy and water usage that minimizes Rice Creek Commons’ impact on the environment. • Create an economically competitive and attractive environment for developers and businesses to create a vibrant community with multi-modal transportation options. 6 The JDA is working toward U.S. Green Building Council’s LEED for Communities certification for the project, with the goal of achieving Platinum certification. This globally recognized standard establishes benchmarks for energy efficiency and sustainability. Achieving this certification will guide the project in meeting its ambitious energy and environmental goals while ensuring accountability through independent third-party verification. In January 2025, the JDA approved Sustainability Design Guidelines that will help shape the development of the full Rice Creek Commons site. The guidelines include several actionable standards that will further the site’s green energy vision and are based on a comprehensive analysis conducted in 2024 by renewable energy consultant Ever-Green Energy and architecture and engineering firm LHB. A community energy system has long been envisioned for the site. Through a grant from the Minnesota Department of Commerce awarded in April 2025, the JDA is currently working with project partners to continue to study the feasibility of a ground-source district energy system to serve the central portion of the site. Environmental History, Remediation and Current Status In 1983, the TCAAP property was placed on the federal and Minnesota Superfund lists. In 2013, Ramsey County acquired the 427-acre property now known as Rice Creek Commons from the U.S. Government. Demolition and site remediation occurred on the 427-acre TCAAP/Rice Creek Commons property, cleaning the soil to residential standards, as defined by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). In 2016, the MPCA issued a Certificate of Completion of Response Actions for soil remediation. In 2019, the 427-acre TCAAP/Rice Creek Commons property soil and surface water was delisted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) from the federal National Priority List (“federal Superfund”). In 2020, the MPCA also delisted the 427-acre TCAAP/Rice Creek Commons property from the state Permanent List of Priorities (“state Superfund”). As result of the above actions, the site was given unrestricted land use status and is ready to be developed. As development of the site proceeds, Ramsey County continues to partner with the Army, EPA, and MPCA to ensure the Army’s ongoing environmental obligations to treat deep groundwater contamination is met. More information about cleanup activities and environmental history can be found via the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) websites. 7 Site Infrastructure Over the past several years, Ramsey County has invested in improving roads and expanding the network surrounding Rice Creek Commons in anticipation of the development. Primary access to the Rice Creek Commons development will be from Highway 96 east of Highway 10 and County Road H near I-35W. A new county road, commonly referred to as the Spine Road to be named Rice Creek Boulevard, will serve as the main artery through the site. A roundabout built by Ramsey County at County Road H provides improved access to the 35W entrance and exit ramps, future Spine Road and Rice Creek Parkway. Roadways within Rice Creek Commons will be a combination of local city roads and private roads. Sidewalk and trail infrastructure will be prioritized within the development to ensure streets are pedestrian and bicycle friendly. In 2024, to prepare for private development, Ramsey County executed an engineering contract for final design of public infrastructure on the site. This design work includes grading, drainage, stormwater management features, mitigated wetlands and public utilities. The design contract also includes the final design of the Rice Creek Blvd (CSAH 13), which will provide primary access to future residential neighborhoods and commercial areas throughout the site, as well as a direct connection to Interstate 35W. Final design and engineering of the public infrastructure began in summer 2024 and is on track for completion in early 2026. This delivery will result in final construction documents for the county public infrastructure and is a critical step toward preparing the site for vertical construction. Existing Conditions Redevelopment of RCC will require future developers to be cognizant of the constraints associated with the site’s history. Elements of the site that may impact development include: • Ongoing on-site treatment of contaminated deep groundwater by the federal government will continue for several decades. The U.S. Army controls this groundwater treatment system (known as the TCAAP Groundwater Recovery System, or TGRS), and a portion of the mechanical for this system is contained in a building on the site to remain. • Although the soil has been remediated to residential standards, depending upon Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) standards, areas of the site may require passive or active building venting systems to mitigate any potential vapor issues from shallow groundwater. MPCA standards have evolved over the past several 8 years. Exact standards may not be known until a specific development site plan is presented to the MPCA. • A district stormwater system for the vast majority of the site will be provided in the natural resources corridor. Additional stormwater ponds will need to be constructed on private land when development occurs. • Shallow groundwater exists in portions of the site and may require remedial action plans and construction contingency plans during construction • Land to the east of RCC (Arden Hills Army Training Site – AHATS) is owned by the federal government and operated by the Minnesota National Guard (MNG). Portions of MNG land have been used for low intensity training adjacent to residential neighborhoods for many decades. Current Development and Planning Status The County and City have planned and prepared for redevelopment for over a decade. Significant public and private accomplishments have already occurred in and around the site: • The County currently owns the 372 acres of the site known as the California Parcel and is finalizing plans to construct a new county road that will serve as the main arterial for the site. • The City last updated the TCAAP Redevelopment Code in April 2024. Its overall vision has remained consistent since it was first drafted. It allows for a maximum of 1,960 units of housing on the site. As part of this approval, there is a requirement that at least 20% of the units will be affordable at 60% area median income or below. • The Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) was updated by the City in 2024. It outlines environmental impacts and mitigation strategies for development of between 1,500-2,500 units of housing and 2.2-2.5 million square feet of commercial/retail uses at Rice Creek Commons. • Design plans for the new county road, Rice Creek Blvd. are nearing completion. Construction of the county roadway and associated public utilities, trails, and stormwater management infrastructure could commence as soon as mid-2026. • In fall 2025, the JDA plans to submit RCC for pre-certification at the Platinum level under LEED for Communities, with full certification planned for 2026. 9 Supporting Documents and Webpages • TCAAP Redevelopment Code (TRC) • TCAAP Regulating Plan • Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) • Sustainability Design Guidelines • Clean Energy Analysis – November 2024 • Project website: www.RiceCreekCommons.com • JDA meeting webpage • City TCAAP redevelopment webpage Request for Information (RFI) This RFI is for informational purposes only. Responses to these questions may help shape a future competitive solicitation for development of all or a portion of the site. Respondents are encouraged but not required to respond to all questions. JDA staff may contact responders with follow-up questions. Feedback will be summarized and shared publicly, but individual responses will be subject to the requirements of Minnesota Statute Section 13.591. Response to this RFI is not a prerequisite for responding to a future solicitation. 1. What do you see as the opportunities of developing at Rice Creek Commons? What would you envision at this site? 2. What do you see as challenges to developing at Rice Creek Commons? 3. Are there any significant factors, requirements, or preferences that you foresee that would impact the ability to be financially successful in this development? 4. Are there any trends in the real estate market that the JDA should be aware of when considering the future of the site? 5. The JDA and project partners are considering either soliciting for a lead developer (sometimes called a “master developer”) or dividing the site into outlots or neighborhood parcels and soliciting developers for each area individually. As a developer, which approach would you find more attractive? What do you see as the opportunities or challenges with each approach? 6. Do the planning documents support the JDA’s vision for a walkable community? If not, what could be done to further that vision? 7. What more information would you need to inform a proposal for development at Rice Creek Commons? 10 Anticipated Schedule Request for Information Issued ___ Response deadline ___ Response presentation to JDA ___ Competitive solicitation for developer TBD Joint Development Authority TCAAP Redevelopment Project Joint Development Authority TCAAP Redevelopment Project AGENDA ITEM 8c MEMORANDUM DATE: August 4, 2025 TO: Joint Development Authority Board of Commissioners FROM: Directors Mitchell and Jagoe SUBJECT: Discuss Community Event Proposal There was a discussion at the August JDA meeting about organizing digital informational sessions instead of an in-person community event this fall. Some of the advantages of an online format include more accessibility to residents, less time commitment for both residents and staff, and the ability to post the recording online for viewing at any time. After discussing with consultants, staff propose organizing a webinar focused on sustainability and clean energy that will include a presentation on the advances made over the past two years and time for questions and answers. This webinar could also include a review of how residents can learn more about the project and a request for topic suggestions for future info sessions. The webinar would be advertised on the project website and through the newsletter, and the recording would also posted on the website. If the webinar is successful, then the JDA may consider repeating this format on other topics. Staff have noted comments on the materials available on the project website and are working to strategize, within technical constraints, on how to ensure as much information is readily accessible as possible. Residents are encouraged to use the comment box on RiceCreekCommons.com or reach out to JDA members or staff to request information or documents. Joint Development Authority TCAAP Redevelopment Project Joint Development Authority TCAAP Redevelopment Project AGENDA ITEM 8d MEMORANDUM DATE: September 9, 2025 TO: Joint Development Authority Board of Commissioners FROM: Directors Mitchell and Jagoe SUBJECT: Review Road Map The Road Map has been updated to include proposed dates for the first half of 2026. Attachment: 2025-2026 JDA Road Map Month Date Meeting/Action or Deadline Topics or Notes JDA Commissioner Onboarding City/County onboarding of respective new commissioners 21 JDA Meeting Organizational Items, Sustainability Design Guidelines, Outlot A Concept Review 3 JDA Work Session 2024 JDA Annual Report, Legislative and Communications Update 15 17 JDA Meeting Outlot A Entitlements Review, Committee Assignments 27 JDA Advisory Committee Meeting Discuss Development Agreement 7 JDA Meeting Outlot A Development Agreement, Budget Review 9 JDA Advisory Committee Meeting Discuss Development Plans 16 Energy Advisory Committee Meeting Onboarding 1 5 JDA Meeting Budget Amendment 7 JDA Advisory Committee Meeting Discuss Development Agreement 14 JDA Advisory Committee Meeting Discuss Development Agreement 16 Energy Advisory Committee Meeting District Energy 30 JDA Advisory Committee Meeting Discuss Development Agreement 2 JDA Meeting 4 JDA Advisory Committee Meeting Discuss Development Agreement 11 JDA Advisory Committee Meeting Discuss Development Agreement 18 JDA Advisory Committee Meeting Discuss Development Agreement 23 JDA Advisory Committee Meeting Discuss Development Agreement 25 Special JDA Meeting Consider extension to Preliminary Development Agreement 30 Jun Expiration: Preliminary Development Agreement with Alatus Jan Rice Creek Commons 2025 Roadmap Feb Deadline: JDA Annual Report due to City and County Deadline: Draft 2026 JDA Budget Mar Apr May 2 Special Closed JDA Meeting Litigation 7 JDA Work Session Solicitation Process 21 Special Closed JDA Meeting Litigation 23 Energy Advisory Committee Meeting Updates Aug 4 JDA Work Session Solicitation Discussion, Energy Advisory Committee Updates 1 Deadline: Coordinate JDA Budget with City and County budget processes 9 JDA Meeting Request for Information Review Potential Community Education Event Oct 6 JDA Work Session 3 JDA Meeting 15 Deadline: Report back on City/County approval of JDA budget Dec 1 JDA Meeting Adopt 2026 JDA budget Month Date Meeting/Action or Deadline Topics or Notes Jan 5 JDA Meeting Organizational Items 2 JDA Work Session 2025 JDA Annual Report 15 Mar 2 JDA Meeting Apr 6 JDA Work Session 1 4 JDA Meeting Jun 1 JDA Work Session Deadline: Draft 2027 JDA Budget May Nov Sept Rice Creek Commons 2026 Roadmap Feb Deadline: JDA Annual Report due to City and County Jul Joint Development Authority TCAAP Redevelopment Project Joint Development Authority TCAAP Redevelopment Project AGENDA ITEM9 MEMORANDUM DATE: September 9, 2025 TO: Joint Development Authority Board of Commissioners FROM: Director Mitchell SUBJECT: Administrative Director’s Report A verbal update will be provided by staff. Joint Development Authority TCAAP Redevelopment Project Joint Development Authority TCAAP Redevelopment Project AGENDA ITEM 10 MEMORANDUM DATE: September 9, 2025 TO: Joint Development Authority Board of Commissioners FROM: Director Jagoe SUBJECT: Development Director’s Report A verbal update will be provided by Director Jagoe.