Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 10-15-1985 . .. ~.. . MINUTES OF REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Village of Arden Hills Tuesday, October 15, 1985 - 7:30 p,m. Village Hall Call to Order Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Woodburn called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m, Roll Call Present: Mayor Robert Woodburn, Councilmembers Dale Hicks, Nancy Hansen. Gary Peck, Thomas Sather Absent: None Also Present: Planner Orlyn Miller, Treasurer Donald Lamb, Public Works Supervisor Robert Raddatz, Clerk-Administrator Charlotte McNiesh, Deputy Clerk Dorothy Zehm . Approval of Minutes Hansen moved, seconded by Sather, that the minutes of the September 30 Council meeting be approved as amended, and the addition to the July 8 Council meeting minutes be approved as submitted, Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) Business from the Floor Paul Malone, 1485 Dawn Circle, referred Council to a transparency of a New BriRhton Bulletin news article re a mass burn plant proposed in New Brighton, west of 35W and north of 1-694; asked if Arden Hills should take action on this proposal; expressed concern because Arden Hills is downwind of the proposed location. Woodburn advised that Arden Hills has contacted Metro Council expressing opposition; noted that the response was that there would be numerous oppor- tunities to express opposition; understands there has been 'no official' action taken by New Brighton to date relative to this proposed location. REPORT OF VILLAGE PLANNER ORLYN MILLER Case No. 84-31, SiRn Approval - Northpark Business Center, Grey Fox Road, WoodbridRe Properties Miller displayed a transparency of proposed Northpark Business Center signage; reported that the wall-mounted signs are identical to those at Northpark Corporate Center (County Road E and Pinetree Drive); noted that the two monument signs, proposed at the east access drive on Grey Fox Road and at the Highway 51 access drive, are simiJ:ar' t'O:. those at. Northp1lrk.... Corporate Center but are .slightly wider and shorter (II' wide, 6' high). Miller reported that verification that the two monument signs meet the 25 foot required setback is needed; reported that the Planning Commission recommends approval of the proposed signage, provided no setback variances are involved. Hicks moved, seconded by Peck, .that Council approve the Northpark Business Center signage, as proposed, provided there are no setback variances for the monument signs, Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) Case No. 85-17, Minor Subdivision (Lot Split) - Lot 12, Block 3, Shady Oaks Addition - R. Moder Council was referred to Planning memo (9/25/85), to Planning Commission recommendations (minutes of October 2 Planning Commission meeting), and to a transparency of the proposed split of lot 12, block 3, Shady Oaks . Addition, Miller explained that the lot is an exception to the Arden Oaks plat, but a split of this lot was anticipated when Arden Oaks was platted, Miller reported that both "lots meet or exceed all dimensional and area require- ments, and no setback variances are created for the existing house, Miller reported that the Planning Commission recommends approval of the lot split, with the split in line with the lot line to the north and south, Miller said he does not see this alignment as a critical issue; noted it does make it neater, but he assumes the lot owner desires to retain a deeper rear yard for his existing house. . ". . . Minutes of Regular Council Meeting, October 15 Page two Marcel Eibensteiner, developer of Arden Oaks, expressed concern relative to drainage which crosses lot 12; suggested that the City require a drainage easement; noted that the lot created by the proposed split will require a substantial amount of fill (estimated 7' to 9') to bring the lot to the level of the road, After discussion, Hicks moved, seconded by Sather, that Council approve the lot split as proposed, with a 20' drainage easement (10' on either side of the line). Motion carried unanimously, (5-0) (Drainage Easement to be added to Certificate of Survey to be recorded with Ramsey County when split is recorded.) Case No, 85-14, RezoninK from R-1 to R-4 and Planned Unit Development Permit for 48-Unit Apartment - STH 96/SnellinK Avenue - M. Eibensteiner, . R. Eibensteiner. S, Mindlin Council was referred to Planning memo (9/25/85), Planning minutes (10/2/85) and to transparency of Site Plan for proposed 48-unit apartment on a 4,4 acre site located at the southwest corner of STH 96 and Snelling Avenue. Miller explained that an R-4 zoning (Multiple Dwelling District) and a PUD Permit are required for the apartment. Miller reported that rezoning of the parcel from R-1 to R-4, and a PUD permit are requested; reported that the Planning Commission recommends approval of the rezoning; continued the public hearing on the PUD Permit pending the additional documentation required for PUD General Plan. Miller noted that the property is designated on the Comprehensive Development Plan as "Medium Density Residential", which corresponds to R-3 (townhouse and low density multiple dwelling district) permitting 4.5 units per acre. Miller commented that with the development of the large Church complex adjacent to the site, R-1 single family is not likely on this small, rela- tively isolated site. Miller said the proposed 48-unit building is not out of scale with the nearby Church complex, and does not crowd the site: suggested that the density of the site is the issue to be resolved. Developer Marcel Eibensteiner said they have been looking for an apartment site; feels an apartment on this site is an appropriate transition between the large Church complex and the residential to the east; noted that the building is sited on the west of the site, providing separation and landscaping between it and the single family residential area east of Snelling, Eibensteiner described the amenit~es of the apartment building and its orientation to a pond with a fountain; explained that there is a need for rental apartments; noted that executives, who are transferred frequently, would prefer renting to purchasing a home: anticipates the units will rent at $700+ per month. Eibensteiner said he talked to the R-1 land owner east of Snelling (Reiling) and he has no opposition to rezoning for an apartment proposal. Bernie Herman, architect, described the 48-unit 3-story building; said there will be 16 units/floor; each unit will have two bedrooms and a balcony, and each unit will have its own laundry facilities. Herman said the proposal conforms to City ordinance in all respects; underground parking is provided for 48 cars and additional surface parking for 59 cars is provided; noted . that the density is 10.6 units/acre (12.0 units/acre permitted in R-4). Herman said the primary access is from Snelling Avenue; noted the turn- around at the main entrance; explained the building is angular to fit the angular site and faces the pond; noted a rear building entrance for access to the parking area to the west of the building. Herman explained that the swimming pool is located in the one-story portion of the building at the building angle: said they are proposing extensive landscaping in addition to the existing tree cover; building will be face brick, doors and windows bronze; building is virtually maintenance-free and conveys a design of permanence and quality. Minutes of Regular Council Meeting, October 15 Page three M. Eibensteiner said he feels the rezoning to R-4 is appropriate based on the changing characteristics of the area; feels the Church development is compatible to R-4 zoning; Highway 96 is more appropriate for R-4 or B-2, than a single-family housing project; Church property does have a B-2 development proposed; feels R-4 is a desirable transition between B-2 and R-t. Eibensteiner said the site would accept 16t units at R-3 which would be marginal for a quality development on this irregular site; noted that the apartment will provide alternate housing in Arden Hills. In discussion, Herman was asked to describe the hardships of the site, Herman said there is a diagonal cut from the northeast corner and a rectangular cut from the northwest corner, a substantial swamp low-land (where they propose a fountain in a pond) and limited site access. Site is adjacent to a large Church complex and bordered on the north by Highway . 96, The size of the pond was estimated at about the same size as the building footprint which is 19,130 square feet; building is 260' in length (both segments). Eibensteiner was asked if a project at 20 units, if zoned R-3, would be feasible, Answer was they need 48 units to make it feasible; would nO longer have an interest in the property; said the price is prohibitive to develop for R-l or R-3. R-3 is too low in density; stated they feel they can make the proposed development blend with R-1 to the east and the Church complex. Hicks said he feels R-4 density is too drastic across a rather narrow street from R-1. Woodburn said it appears the price of the land is too high for the appropriate zoning, which does not make R-4 realistic or appropriate; feels the economics at R-4 may be caused by paying too much for the land; feels the R-4 density increases the already dense Church complex, especially traffic; noted that the Comprehensive Plan describes Arden Hills as a "City of Homes". Robert Eibensteiner said they are interested in a quality project on this corner site; said R-3 would result in greater lot coverage with garages, driveways, streetsi cannot make R-3 look as deluxe as the project they.are proposing at R-4; explained that Mindlin, another Arden Hills' resident, will be 1/3 owner (with Marcel and Robert Eibensteiner) and will be resident manager of the property, Eibensteiner said the project is patterned after the Birch Pond apartment in New Brighton, a quality building, and feels it will rent at $700 to $800 per- month. Eibensteiner said people coming to town want to rent an apartment like this, rather than the typical apart- ment n some buy a house to get quality but "take a bath" during a down market when transferred out of town; noted that Arden Hills has many potential high-paid executives, and a need for this type of housing; today there are many corporate transfers needing this type of housing; doesn't feel R-3 would improve Arden Hills' image, Eibensteiner said, if he lived across Snelling from this site, he'd prefer a high quality R-4 than R-3 with the scattered appearance of townhouses, garages and driveways; feels R-4 can't be as detrimental as R-3 could be; said R-3 at 20 units is not feasible for a full-time manager/owner - would only support a part-time manager; noted this is a long-term investment for all three of the owners (Steve Mindlin, Robert and Marcel Eibensteiner); stated he feels this .. is an appropriate location for a sound endeavor - the market is there. Hansen expressed concerns about density of the site and traffic on Snelling at Highway 96; also asked about the number of apartment units now ava;lsQle . in surrounding villages. Answer was there is not much to compare this project with in this area -- there are some quality condominium units, but many people prefer to rent rather than pay $125,000 for a condominium. Hicks moved that Council deny the rezoning from R-1 to R-4 on the basis that R-4 is not compatible with the Comprehensive Development Plan, and an abrupt density change from the existing area density of R-l. Motion was seconded by Hansen and carried (Hicks, Hansen, Woodburn voting in favor of the motion; Sather, Peck voting in opposition) 3-2. Minutes of Regular Council Meeting, October 15 Page fOLlr Case No. 85-15, Special Use Permit for Fill - Cmiel/Heller Deferred for a month at request of Applicant. Case No. 85-11, Preliminary Plat of Northwoods and Site Plan Review - Opus Corporation Council was referred to Planning memo (9/26/85), Planning Commission minutes of 10/2/85 and to transparency of proposed Preliminary Plat of Northwoods. Miller explained that the plat consists of 4 lots, plus an outlot which will be platted in the future, when the location of the dedicated loop road is finalized; noted that the road is currently proposed on the west property line with 1/2 of the 60' width on either side of the line, Miller reported that the Planning Commission recommends approval of the Preliminary Plat with the understanding that the road will eventually loop to Red Fox Road, either on the line as proposed, if this can be accomplished, . or entirely on the Opus site. Miller noted that the loop street is con- sidered important to the development of the undeveloped land in this entire area. Bob Worthington, Opus Corporation, briefly described the Opus Corporation, its background and the locations of its many properties throughout the United States. Worthington presented brochures picturing several of the Opus properties: - Westfield Center, in Minnetonka, - Opus gateway on Highway 18, near Highway 494 and 100. - Highland Oaks and Kensington Center in suburban Chicago. - Dodge Tower in Phoenix, etc. Worthington said Northwoods is their first entry into the north region of this metro area, which he described as a planned development, phased over the next two to five years. Worthington reported that they have found poor soil conditions on a portion of the Phase I site; explained the soil conditions are cause for modifica- tion; therefore, they are not requesting building permit approval tonight; are requesting Preliminary Plat approval only tonight, Worthington explained that the 4-10t development, as proposed, will consist of two office/showroom buildings in Phase I (50% office - 50% service space) , both one-story; Building A at 50,000 square 'feet, Building B at 30,000 square feet. Worthington said Building C, Phase II, is envisioned as 100% office, possibly up to 5 stories; noted that lot 3, block 1 is to be built by others, and is envisioned as a restaurant. Worthington displayed a colored rendering of Buildings A and B (Phase I); building exteriors will be face brick. Worthington said, because of the discovery of a great deal of peat, a second on-site pond may have to be created, reducing the size of Building A, Worthington said this may change the use of Building A to 100% office; noted that they had a traffic analysis prepared, for their initial proposal, which will be modified; said he does not feel it will vary extensively from the one presented to the Planning Commission. Worthington said they would like to get under construction this year, or early next year; may go for a 3-story building for Building A (50,000 square feet), In discussion, it was asked if a temporary cul-de-sac would be needed for on-site turn-around, pending the construction of the loop road through . the outlot to Red Fox Road. Miller said he does not feel a cul-de-sac is necessary; can turn on the property, It was suggested that this on-site turning be checked with the Fire Chief to see if this is adequate for fire trucks, before Final Plat approval is requested. How the property would develop, without the 1/2 road on the adjacent property, was questioned, Worthington said he believes the proposed loop is the best way to serve the entire property; noted that Opus had thought they were going to control the whole parcel but now we don't; feels it should be a shared access. Worthington said there is room for Opus to negotiate with the adjoining developer; suggested an option could be that Opus pay for the road so we won't have to reduce our lot sizes; feels the road can work even if it is entirely on the Opus site. Worthington sa;j.d he ,:" . Minutes of Regular Council Meeting, October 15 Page five feels the issue is economic, not planning; noted that it could benefit the adjoining property by providing an access to the rear of the site from the loop road. Hansen moved, seconded by Hicks, that Council approve the Preliminary Plat of Northwoods as presented. Motion carried unanimously, (5-0) (Woodburn advised Opus of the City's park dedication requirements of which Worthington said he is aware; said he would like to have each building 1n the development pay its share as the site develops,) Case No. 84"1IA. Modified Site Plan for Hi~h Tech Office/Warehouse - Everest Investments II Council was referred to Planning memo (9/26/85), to Planning Commission . minutes of 10/2/85 and to a transparency of the proposed modified site plan, Miller explained that the building has been modified from an initially proposed 75.000 square foot building to 55,000 square feet and the parking has been increased to meet the needs of a tenant who desires more office and less showroom space. Miller explained that the proposal is basically the same layout and appearance, with basically the same circulation pattern, as previously approved a little over one year ago. Miller explained that the applicant opposes the loop road as proposed by Opus, one-half on this site, but has provided for it, if it is the decision of the City to locate it as proposed. Miller said the proposed site plan will meet all ordinance requirements whether or not the loop road is sited on the Everest Investment II property as proposed by Opus. Miller reported that the Planning Commission recommends approval of the modified site plan and building permit. Tim Nelson, Everest Investments II, said they have a tenant for the building; want to start construction this fall, A rendering of the original proposal and the modified site, were shown. The building will be of face brick, glass and metal trim, with an atrium entry, Nelson said their tenant requires the increased parking as proposed; noted that the parking is sufficient for 100% office use, but that use is not proposed - tenant needs are for office and light assembly and reduced truck service from the initial plan. Nelson reported that the plan meets all code requitements; reported they have drainage approval by RCWD and the City Engineer. Nelson said they have reviewed the Planner's recommended conditions of approval (memo of 9/26/85) and object to the future road extension (1/2 on th&ir site), and to shared parking, which he feels are unfair to their development. Nelson said Opus has 25 acres; feels they can find room on their own site for their road; noted that the Everest site is on 5 acres and receives no benefit from the loop road proposed; feels they have good access from Red Fox Road. Nelson said the loop road is considered: 1. A burden on our 5-acre site, with no corresponding benefit for us. 2. It represents a taking without compensation if the City determines it should be sited as proposed, 3. Feels shared parking is permitted by City ordinance, but not required and should not be imposed on their development. Nelson explained that the building occupied by Zycad, west of this site, is under separate ownership; feels Zycad has had opportunities to resolve its need for on-site parking, but is not interested in the added cost. . Nelson explained that their tenant wants exclusive use of the site and the on-site parking;' explained that if shared parking is required; it would impose constraints on terms of re-sale, with no control by either owner, and it would hinder their financing of the project. In discussion, concern was expressed relative to the east access drive and the proposed loop road - Miller said it exceeds the 25' separation required by ordinance: feels the real issue is for truck traffic, which is limited; said that, as proposed, separation is workable and acceptable, Miller said, if the road goes through as proposed, he suggests that Everest punch a road through to the ring road; suggested that this not be a condition of approval: suggested waiting until we see how Opus develops. . Minutes of Regular Council Meeting, October 15 Page six It was asked if it would be advantageous for the City to take an easement now for a potential road if needed in the future. Miller said the City has that option if the City determines this is the proper road location. Hicks moved, seconded by Hansen, that Council approve the modified site plan and building permit for Everest Investment II, subject to the recommenda- tions of the Planning Commission (minutes of 10/2/85) and subject to a 30' wide easement along the east of the site for 1/2 of a potential road, if this is determined by the City to be the appropriate location for the road. Bill Franke, attorney for the developer, said he has a grave concern with the condition to grant an easement for this road; noted that the site plan meets all ordinance requirements; feels it is unfair to impose an . easement which could impair their project. Hicks explained that his motion was an attempt to keep the City's options open; understood that Opus would be willing to pay for the road. Miller noted that we often require easements to protect against future possibilities; noted it would provide more flexibility for the City in the future; noted it is not a foregone conclusion that this is the best siting for the road. Hicks asked how an easement would reduce their ability to sell or receive financing, Franke explained that the City could convey its rights to Opus for the land which causes Everest to consent to give the easement without compensation for a road for the benefit of Opus; aCknowledged that it is not uncommon to dedicate a road when it benefits the property; feels it is unfair to us and unnecessary now, and it impairs our getting a fair return. Peck noted the options if we don't get a road now: 1. Can site the road entirely on the Opus site, 2. Property owners can negotiate the road location. 3. Condemnation by the City, which eventually is an added cost to the developer and is time-consuming. Sather said he feels the City is "cutting the legs out from under the developer"; noted he has accommodated the road if it is determined to be the best location; feels the City is taking away all his negotiating strength; noted the development meets or exceeds the requirements of the City Code. Sather said he prefers that Council not require the easement; feels we would be taking advantage of the developer, Hicks said his intent was to protect the City, not take advantage of anyone. McNiesh suggested the possibility of a "Development Agreement" when the road siting is determined and road is proposed for dedication, Hicks withdrew from his motion the requirement of a 30' road easement, Seconder Hansen agreed. Motion carried as amended. (5-0) Request for SiRn Relocation - Rutter's Bohemian Cue Service, 1660 W. HiRhway 96 - Special Use Permit 79-20 Miller reported that Rutter wants to move the existing sign to the west side of his property, near the driveway where his customers come in, Miller noted that the Special Use Permit allows the sign whe~e it is; explained that, if he is permitted to move it to the proposed location, it would be at the same setback, but elevated 4' above ground (ground elevation is lower at driveway location than at its present location in front of the house). Miller asked if this relocation is considered significant; if so, a public hearing will be required. Council concurred that the relocation, as described, is not significant, . and authorized relocation of the sign accordingly. Report of Fire Chief Dave Koch Koch briefly described the history of Lake Johanna Volunteer Fire Department which originally consisted of firefighters from the neighborhood around the New Brighton Road station; explained that currently we have 25 fire- fighters at each of the two stations (New Brighton Road and Hodgson Road) and there are 13 pieces of equipment. , . Minutes of Regular Council Meeting, October 15 Page seven Koch referred Council to list of manpower and equipment needed for an additional station, and the estimated costs to start and operate the first year ($869,100,00). Koch noted that the cost estimate is intended to be used as a gauge, noted that building cost depends on the type of building constructed; noted that land costs vary, etc, Koch also referred Council to list of actual response time in '84 and '85 to various locations in the south portion of the City from the New Brighton Road station. Koch noted that response times also vary, depending on weather conditions, traffic, response time of firefighters from home to the station and then to the fire; noted that the critical areas are probably the industrial area west ~f Lexington, north of the railroad tracks, and the southeast corner of the City west of Lexington and north of County Road D, which response times were listed at 3-4 minutes and 6-7 minutes respectively. . Koch advised that the break-off between Stations 1 and 2 is 1-694; noted that all firefighters report first to the station and then to the fire; noted that log times are from the computer; Koch said the railroad tracks are a response time factor; now have one station on either side of the tracks. Koch suggested that response time could be reduced by having "sleepers" in the stations, at least during some months of the year; estimated this cost at about$22,OOD/year at $15 to $20 per night. Koch said if complaints are received relative to response time, the department wants to know; said he is not aware of any complaints. Koch suggested that if Arden Hills is contemplating another station, he would recommend that it be south of the railroad tracks, In discussion, Koch was asked if Arden Hills can get along with one station? Koch said the station should be close to residential - not in an industrial area; noted. that most of the firefighters in Station 1 live near the station; noted this reduces the response time for fighters to get to the station and then to the fire. Koch suggested adding sleepers to the existing station and/or adding to the size of the existing station, rather than a second station; stated they have no experienced firefighters in the area of the Shoreview Station on County Road I or in the area near Victoria and 1-694. Koch noted that if the contract cities stay with stations 1 and 2, we are looking at expans.ion in the near future; remodeling costs; noted they are in need of room now - need a hose drying tower, etc.; noted that they have the space to expand on the Station 1 site. When asked if we can get along without a ladder truck, Koch said the department works well with mutual aid departments - New Brighton, Rosevil1e, Mounds View all have ladder trucks; estimated the cost of a ladder truck at $300,000 to $400,000; stated we'd need a ladder truck for a 5-story building, if con- structed. In discussion, it was the general consensus of Council that if a south station, in Shoreview, is south of the railroad tracks, and c10se.t9 Arden Hills, it may be of minimal benefit to Arden Hills; north of the interstate and tracks would be of no benefit; certain criteria of a station near the southeast area of Arden Hills may have some response time advantage for Arden Hills, (McNiesh to relay Council's reaction toShoreview's inquiry're1ative to Arden Hills' interest in a fourth fire station,) . Donation - Minnesota Baptist Conference Woodburn extended Council's grateful appreciation to Minnesota Baptist Conference for its $300 contribution to the City of Arden Hills. --.- --.--.- , . Minutes of Regular Council Meeting, October 15 Page eight REPORT OF VILLAGE TREASURER DONALD LAMB Investments 10/11/85 - $531,746.36 at Twin City Federal @ 8.06% interest, maturing 4/14/86. 10/15/85 - $279,149,27 at First Federal @ 8.20% interest, maturing 10/14/86. - $100,000,00 at American National @ 8,10% interest, maturing 10/14/86. - $178,513.16 at Twin City Federal @ 7.69% interest, maturing 1/15/86. - $102,035,00 at Midwest Federal @ 8.20% interest, maturing 10/14/86. Sather .moved, seconded by Peck, that Council ratify the Treasurer's invest- ments. Motion carried unanimously, (5-0) Approval of Fall Park Pro~ram Leaders . Council was referred to Buckley's memo (10/8/85). Hicks moved, seconded by Sather, that Council approve the hiring of fall park program leaders as outlined in Buckley's memo, Motion carried unanimously, (5-0) Sale of Public Works Truck Council was referred to Raddatz' memo of 10/11/85 re sale of 1979 GMC 3/4 ton pickup with plow. Hansen moved, seconded by Peck, that Council authorize the sale of the truck for $3,400.00 as recommended by Radd~tz. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) Elmquist Appraisal Council was referred to appraisal of "Lindey's Triangle". In discussion, it was noted that Ramsey County holds the easement for road right-of-way; fee holder has the option to re-gain the property if the County releases the easement. It was asked if the City can legally buy the easement, It was noted that Lynden indicated in his letter that the underlying fee owner queried whether the City is interested in the underlying fee title, After discussion, Hicks moved, seconded by Sather, that Council instruct Lynden to indicate to legal counsel for fee title owner that the City has had the property appraised at $5,000 and offers to purchase the fee title for $5,000. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) OTHER BUSINESS Park Meetin~ Hansen reported that the Parks Committee will have a guest speaker at its October 22 meeting relative to park grants. ReRional Transit Meetin~ at Map1ewood City Hall, Wednesday, October 16 Hansen reported a conflict that evening. There were no volunteers to attend the meeting. Council Salaries Council was referred to an article in the Bulletin re salaries for Council people. Sather suggested that Council discuss the matter this year for . implementation in 1986; noted that Arden Hills appears to be "out,of line" with surrounding conununities; noted that a "larger purse" may attract more Interest in serving the City in this capacity, REPORT OF CLERK ADMINISTRATOR CHARLOTTE MCNIESH Chan~e Order No. 1, Impr, No. P-8S-1, Hamline SurcharRe Council was referred to Change Order No, 1, Impr. No. P-85-1 @ $525.00 for weir and berm construction. Hicks moved, seconded by Hansen, that Council approve Change Order No. 1, as presented. Motion carried unanimqusly. (5-0) . . Minutes of Regular Council Meeting, October 15 Page nine Apportionment of Assessments Hansen moved, seconded by Hicks, that Council adopt the following apportion- ment of assessment resolutions: - Resolution No. 85-53, RESOLUTION RELATING TO APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENTS RELATING TO CONSOLIDATED SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS NOS. 12 AND 13. - Resolution No, 85-54, RESOLUTION RELATING TO APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENTS RELATING TO COMBINED IMPROVEMENT W-77-5 AND W-78-2, - Resolution No. 85-56, RESOLUTION RELATING TO APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENTS RELATING TO CONSOLIDATED WATER IMPROVEMENTS NOS. 68-2,AND 68-3, - Resolution No. 85-57, RESOLUTION RELATING TO APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENTS RELATING.TO SANITARY SEWER NO. 15. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) . Joint Compensation Study - Comparable Worth Council was referred to MAMA memo of October 2 and to McNiesh's memo of 10/9/85 re suggested complaint procedure and suggested appeal review com- mittee, Additional names were suggested as potential appeal committee members, Peck agreed to represent Council on the appe~! board. Computer Symposium - November 6 - 8 Hicks moved, seconded by Hansen, that Council authorize McNie~'s attendance at the symposium in St. Cloud, and reimbursement of her expenses, Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) Claims and Payroll Hansen moved, seconded by Peck, that Council approve the Claims and Payroll as presented. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) Adjournment Hansen moved, seconded by Sather, that the meeting adjourn at 12:30 a,m, Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) ~J;jJ)Jf2uL, /'? /(~~ Charlotte McNiesh Robert L, Woodburn Clerk-Administrator Mayor Notice of MeetinR The next regular Council meeting will be on Monday, October 28, 1985, at 7:30 p.m. at the Village Hall. .