HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 09-09-1985
.
,
.
.
...
MINUTES OF REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
Village of Arden Hills
Monday, September 9, 1985 - 7:30 p.m.
Village Hall
Call to Order
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Woodburn called the meeting to
order at 7:30 p.m.
Roll Call
Present:
Mayor Robert Woodburn, Councilmembers Dale Hicks, Nancy Hansen,
Gary Peck, Thomas Sather.
None
Attorney James Lynden, Engineer Donald Christoffersen, Planner
Orlyn Miller, Treasurer Donald Lamb, Parks Director John
Buckley, Public Works Supervisor Robert Raddatz, Clerk-
Administrator Charlotte McNiesh, Deputy Clerk Dorothy Zehm.
Absent:
Also Present:
Approval of Minutes
Hansen moved, seconded
approved as corrected.
by Peck, that the minutes of August 26 and August 12 be
Motion carried unanimously. (5-0)
Business from the Floor
None.
Schedule of Activities - Arden Hills Fall Festival, September 14
Parks Director John Buckley reported that the fourth annual Arden Hills Fall
Festival, sponsored by the Arden Hills-Shoreview Jaycees and Norwest Banks of
St. Paul-Arden Hills, will be on Saturday, September 14.
Some of the events will be:
- Arts and. Craft Fair - 9:00 to 4:30 p.m.
Family Run - 10:00 a.m.
Volleyball Tournament - 1:00 p.m.
Petting Zoo - 1:00 - 3:00 p.m.
Bowling Contest - 2:00 - 4:00 p.m.
Children's Wheel and Pet Parade - 11:45 a.m.
Prizes will be:
- 3 nights for 2 at Lake Tahoe
- "Night to Remember" at McGuires
- $100 worth of groceries at Hauser's IGA, Arden Plaza
Tickets are $1.00 each (12 for $10.00) available from area merchants, City Hall,
Jaycees.
PUBLIC HEARINGS - SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
(See attached excerpts of Minutes of Public Hearings.)
A. Improvement No. SS-W-P-ST-84-1 Royal Hills North
B. Improvement No. SS-W.P-ST-84-2 Lametti Addition
C. Improvement No. SS-W-P-ST-84-3 McClung Third Addition
REPORT OF VILLAGE ATTORNEY JAMES LYNDEN
Resolution No. 85-43, INDEMNIFYING STATE OF MINNESOTA FROM LIABILITY FOR
IMPROVEMENT NO. P-85-1, PHASE I. HAMUNE AVENUE SURCHARGE
Council was referred to draft of Resolution No. 85-43, recommended for adoption
by Lynden.
Hicks moved, seconded by Sather, that Council adopt Resolution No. 85-43,
A RESOLUTION INDEMNIFYING THE STATE OF MINNESOTA FROM ANY LIABILITY WITH RESPECT
TO IMPROVEMENT PROJECT P-85-1 -- PHASE ONE (MSA I.D. No. S.A.P. 187-102-01).
Motion carried unanimously. (5-0)
Ordinance No. 237, Shoreland Mana~ement
Council was referred to revised draft of Ordinance No. 237. Lynden recommended
its adoption with a wording change on page 7, section 4.B.(1) delete August
26, 1985, and insert "effective date of this ordinance"; adoption to be subject
to written approval of the ordinance by the Department of Natural Resources.
.
,
.-.
Minutes of Regular Council Meeting, September 9, 1985
Page two
In discussion, concern was expressed re the clarity of Section 6.B Compliance
(p. 13) and Section 3.G. Substandard Uses.
Council concurred to refer these sections to Attorney Lynden and Planner Miller
for modification.
REPORT OF VILLAGE PLANNER ORLYN MILLER
Case No. 85-10, Special Use Permit Amendment - Hunter's Park
Miller reported that a public hearing was held by the Planning Commission
relative to proposed modification of the Hunter's Park Special Use Permit to
allow changes to the cluster homes in Hunter's Park, if no variances to the
R-3 District are requested. Miller noted that variance requests would be
handled by the variance procedure; noted that all applications to the City would
be subject to prior approval by the Hunter's Park architectural committee, 4It
Miller reported that the Planning Commission recommends approval of an
Amended Special Use Permit to allow additions and alterations to the individual
cluster homes, subject to conditions in minutes of 9/4/85.
Mr. Crassweller (Hunter's Park Homeowners' Association) said the Association
has no problem with the proposed amendments.
Hansen moved, seconded by Hicks, to accept the Planning Commission's recom-
mendation to approve amendment of the Special Use Permit for Hunter's Park to
allow alterations to the single family cluster homes (Additions 1, 2 and 4)
subject to the following conditions:
1. If additions or other alterations do not require setback or coverage
variances, only a building permit, issued administratively, will be
required.
2. If additions or other alterations do require additional variances of
any kind, the standard variance procedure shall apply.
3. In both cases, the Homeowners' Association shall review and approve
the proposed addition or other alteration before submission to the City.
In addition, the Homeowners' Association architectural review committee
shall assist individual homeowners in determining if variances are
required for proposed alterations.
4. These conditions shall not apply to the Hunter's Park apartments. Any
modification of those structures shall require an amended Special Use
Permi t.
5. The standard-lot, Single-family homes in Hunter's Park, which were
not constructed under specifically approved site and building plans,
shall be exempted from Homeowners' Association review and approval.
6. A written recommendation of approval shall be submitted to City, dis-
closing the vote of the Homeowners' Association architectural review
committee.
In discussion, it was asked if other Special Use Permits wi1l.require review
also, in order to allow minor changes. Miller said that Chatham is under a
Special Use Permit; said it ~as not the intent~on, at the time of adoption of
that Special Use Permit, but, technically, it could be the interpretation
that the homes could not be modified. Miller said, without looking at the
Chatham Special Use Permit, this could be the case in Chatham as well; noted
that a style of homes was approved in the Chatham area, with certain minimum
setback requirements.
Motion carried unanimously. (5-0)
.
Case No. 85-13. Identification Si~n - Valentine Hills School
Hicks moved, seconded by Hansen, to approve the Valentine Hills School
identification sign as proposed. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0)
Case No. 85-12, Lot Split and Lot Area Variance - Glenn and Nancy BeRRin,
4519 Lakeshore Place
Miller explained that a lot split was previously approved contingent upon a
registered survey indicating that there would be no variances for the existing
home. Miller reported that the survey shows the house was not located as
previously shown; split as proposed will create a lot about 1,400 square feet
below the required 14,000 square feet minimum - a 10% variance.
Miller reported that the Board of Appeals and Planning Commission have
.,
Minutes of Regular Council Meeting, September 9, 1985
Page three
recommended denial of the area variance; noted that one member of the Planning
Commission opposed the denial, noting that. the open area is there, even if
the lot area variance is actually substantial; suggested options for considera-
tion which would make the proposed lot less sub-standard than proposed. Another
option was for applicant to obtain additional lot area by acquiring a portion
of the lot to the south, which puts the applicant at the will of the neighbor,
and makes no real difference for his building site.
.
Miller noted that the property to the south has been filled; lot is about
24,000 - 25,000 square feet, is substantially deficient in depth, but is a lot
of record; noted that this lot does not lend itself to be split, even though
it is large. Miller noted that the proposed Beggin lot exceeds the 95' lot
width at the building line, building envelope meets all setbacks, but lot is
deficient in area (12,600 square feet - 14,000 square feet required).
Glenn Be~~in explained that the lot to the south has a drainage ditch 10' to
IS' in width which cannot be developed; explained that he discovered a stake
to the south of his property, but this stake was apparently not the property
stake. Beggin said he has been active in protesting the filling of the lot to
the south; therefore, it makes it difficult for him to now request the pur-
chase of a portion of land from his neighbor.
Beggin said there are many lots in the Chatham area that are the size of his
proposed lot, or smaller; feels that crowding will never take place regardless
of the ownership of the unbuildable areas to the south and west of his
lot.
Beggin reported that the watermain ends at his existing house; pointed out
that access for the proposed lot could be changed from Highway 10 to Lakeshore
Place, which would also add to the area of the proposed lot - (could cut
across the front of the lot to the north including the southeast corner of
this lot in the proposed new lot.)
In discussion, it was noted that it seems it would be advantageous to acquire
the 10' - IS' drainage area along the south lot line, noting that if granted
legally, this area might, in fact, be filled at some time. Beggin described
the 30' - 40' difference in elevation between the two lots since the property
to the south was filled. Beggin said the property owner tried to fill this
drainageway, which is controlled by RCWD and was told he could not.
Hicks said that Council has an obligation to not create sub-standard lots.
Hicks moved to deny the lot split which creates a lot less than the 14,000
square feet in the R-l District. Motion was seconded by Hansen.
Sather spoke in defense of the applicant, stating that Council is asking the
applicant to do business with a property owner who has acted in contempt of
the City Code by illegally filling his property; feels Council should assist
the applicant by condemning the necessary acreage and give the applicant the
square footage he needs. Miller. said he believes the City must prove
"public benefit" (beneficial to both parties) under the right of eminent do-
main.
Motion carried (Hicks, Hansen, Peck, Woodburn voting in favor of the motion;
Sather voting in opposition).
.
Case No. 85-2, Amended Preliminary Plat - Ed~ewater Estates
Miller explained the various road length proposals for Parkshore Drive, noting
that the original cuI de sac as proposed was 590' in length. Miller reported
approval of the Preliminary Plat was subject to reduction of the cuI de sac
length to 500'; noted that if no change is approved tonight a 500' long cuI de sac
would be required.
Miller explained that at present the options are a 500' long or 390' long
cuI de sac; reported that the Planning Commission recommends approval of the
revised preliminary plat with a 390' cuI de sac, which Miller said will
adequately serve both properties; noted that the shortened road does impact
the park dedication by extending the park to meet the road.
Council was advised that both landowners have agreed to a 390' Parkshore Drive
cuI de sac. George Winiecki said they are in agreement, if that roadway
h
Minutes of Regular Council Meeting, September 9, 1985
Page four
length is adequate for their needs. Hicks asked the reason for a reduced road
length from 500' to 390'. Answer was, in order to reach a financial agreement
between both property owners. Hicks said his concern is "traffic flow".
Christoffersen said the reduced road length will not affect the traffic flow;
noted that an additional right-of-way will be needed from the Winieckis for the
shortened road (shown in cross hatch on the revised preliminary plat.)
Hicks asked if the Winieckis are willing to grant the City an easement for
the turn-around. George Winiecki said they had not dealt with this matter;
stated they are willing to work with the City, but can't say what we'll do
right now. McGuire said he will grant the easement for the street right-of-
way.
Hicks noted that the additional park land dedication appears to reduce the cash
dedication; said he is not willing to trade the cash for the area of park land .
which provides limited recreational benefit.
Zappia (attorney for McGuire) explained that this land does benefit the City;
reported that in arriving at the agreement between the property owners, the
developer has given up a great deal in agreeing to a 2/3 " 1/3 cost split for
the road; asked Council's acceptance of the park dedication (land and cash)
as proposed (1.6 acres + .54 acres x value of raw land).
Hicks moved, seconded by Hansen, that Council approve the revised Preliminary
Plat (8/30/85) with Parkshore Drive 390' in length, subject to the granting of
the additional right-of-way easement by the property owner to the south, and
subject to a park dedication by the developer of 1.6 acres of land plus cash
equivalent of .54 acres. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0)
Proposed Improvement No. SS-W-P-ST-85-2, EdRewater Estates
Mayor Woodburn opened the public hearing and Clerk-Administrator McNiesh
verified publication of the Notice of Hearing in the New Bri~hton Bulletin on
August 21 and 28, and that notices were mailed to affected property owners
on August 28.
George Winiecki addressed the motion made by Hicks relative to the Parkshore
Drive cuI de sac easement dedication; asked if it could be changed to a
"temporary" instead of a "permanent" cuI de sac; expressed concern that they
may need this land when their land is developed.
Christoffersen explained that a '''temporary'' is usually for a one or two year
period, a defined -period of time; feels we need a "permanent" now; explained
that it can be vacated at a later date.
After a short conference between George and Jim Winiecki, George said they will
give the easement for the additional right-of-way.
Zappia said they now have a 100% petition for the proposed improvement
(Edgewater Estates), which appears to negate the need for a public hearing.
The public hearing was closed (10:40 p.m.).
Hicks moved, seconded by Sather, that Council adopt Resolution No. 85-42,
ORDERING CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENT NO. SS-W-P-ST-85-2 PURSUANT TO PETITION
BY 100% OF OWNERS OF AFFECTED PROPERTY. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0)
Request for Proposals, LaSalle Partners, Northwoods Site
Miller explained that request for proposals is the approximately 27 acres
south of 1-694, north of Red Fox Road; reported we were working with Opus ...
Corporation when FMC asked for consideration for their proposal. Miller
explained that the request is directed to Opus and the City to put a package
together, including financial inducements. Miller reported that Opus is
willing to work with FMC to incorporate FMC in their development if possible,
and if this is desired by the City. Miller reported that the Planning Com-
mission was shown a preliminary sketch of the Opus proposal,not i~cluding FMC,
which he believes would be less intense than if the project would include
FMC.
McNiesh reported that she asked the kind of enhancements they are looking
for from Arden Hills; gathered from talking with them that' this could include
tax increment financing for the project and anything else City would like to
offer such as site preparation, deferment of assessments, or actually
putting in the needed streets and utilities.
r
.
Minutes of Regular Council Meeting, September 9, 1985
Page five
Lamb reported that he met with LaSalle representatives and the State Economic
Development personnel; reported that no specific enhancements were requested -,
want to know what the City will give them.
In discussion, it was noted that the site has a proposal under study; City
would look forward to FMC as a part of that proposal, if that is what FMC
desires. It was noted that the City has not offered incentives to others.
Miller reported that the City can make a direct response, if Council desires;
noted that Opus will prepare a letter response, and will include the City's
response if that is preferred.
.
Council concurred that the City is willing to work with Opus and FMC in the
development of this 'property, but is not prepared at this time to offer any
financial enhancements.
REPORT OF VILLAGE ENGINEER DONALD CHRISTOFFERSEN
ChanRe Order No.3, Improvements Nos. 84-1 and 84-3, Roval Hills North and
McClunR's Third Addition
Council was referred to Change Order No. 3 recommended for payment by
Christoffersen.
Hicks moved, seconded by Peck, that Council approve Change Order No.3,
Project Nos. SS-W-P-ST-84-1 (Royal Hills North) and SS-W-P-ST-84-3 (McClung
Third Addition) in the amount of $1,064.00. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0)
Approval of Five Year ProRram for MSA Improvements
Council was referred to Christoffersen's report of 9/9/85 re suggested
five-year program for MSA improvements. Christoffersen noted that his con-
servative estimate of the cost of construction of Hamline Avenue is $900,000;
recommends assessing at least 20% of the cost.
In discussion, it was noted that Snelling Avenue is also in need of con-
struction. Christoffersen explained that Snelling is not in the system to
date; could probably look at MSA funds for Snelling in 1990-1991.
Christoffersen was asked if MSA funds can be used to payoff bonds, after
improvement has been completed. (Christoffersen to get more information
relative to the options available for use of MSA funds, for Council's considera-
tion.)
Hicks moved, seconded by Hansen, that Council adopt Resolution No. 85-44,
ADOPTING THE SCHEDULING OF MSA CONSTRUCTION AND SPECIFYING THE CONSTRUCTION
OF HAMLINE AVENUE IN 1986. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0)
Christoffersen suggested that a public hearing ordering the feasibility study
for Hamline Avenue construction -in 1986, be held in January, and'that
surveys along Hamline Avenue be obtained in 1985. Christoffersen explained
that because this is not a petitioned project, a 4/5 vote will be needed to
order construction.
.
Cable TV Construction on Katie Lane
Mark Matthews referred Council to his letter of 9/6/85 relative to his cost
estimate for connecting Katie Lane to the Cleveland Avenue trunk ($4,658)
which would be a temporary connection, and to Stowe Avenue ($7,858) which
would be the eventual connection of the entire Hazelnut Park, when developed.
Bill Bauer said we are interested in getting service to Katie ~~ne from the
Arden Hills trunk; noted that Group W is obligated to connect all Arden Hills
residents to the Arden Hills trunk.
Mannings, residents on Katie Lane, accepted Council's decision to require a
permanent Katie Lane hook-up to the Arden Hills trunk as soon as possible.
Appointment to Cable TV Advisorv Committee
Mayor Woodburn appointed Bill Oberreit as a member of the Cable TV Advisory
Committee for the balance of 1985.
Minutes of Regular Council Meeting, September 9, 1985
Page six
Hansen moved, seconded by Peck, to ratify the Mayor's appointment. Motion
carried unanimously. (5-0)
Park Dedication Status - Ospina/Anderson Site
Hansen reported that the 10% park dedication for the entire Steak Inn site
was settled on June 24, 1974, in the amount of $2,500 in cash plus ponding;
noted that the Steak Inn site, at that time, included the site now proposed
for development by Ospina/Anderson for a medical/dental facility; therefore,
it appears that the park dedication has been paid for this site.
Sather moved, seconded by Hansen, that the park dedication for Case No. 84-30,
Ospina/Anderson Medical/Dental Facility has been satisfied. Motion
carried unanimously. (5-0)
Landscape Inspection Reports - Final Inspection and Release of Bonds
Council was referred to landscape reports from Landscape Inspector Oelke.
W. W. Grainger - 4444 Round Lake Road West.
Hicks moved, seconded by Hansen, that Council accept the landscaping for
the W. W. Grainger site, and authorize release of the maintenance bond.
Motion carried unanimously. (5-0)
Nielsen (Zycad) - 1315 Red Fox Road
Hicks moved, seconded by Hansen, that Council accept the landscaping for
the Nielsen site, and authorize release of the maintenance bond, subject
to replacement of the dead plantings, noted in the report, at the west
and southwest corner of the site. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0)
OTHER BUSINESS
Joint Finance Committee/Council Meeting
Hicks moved, seconded by Hansen, that Council schedule the joint Finance/
Council meeting on September 19, 1985, as a Special Council meeting. Motion
carried unanimously. (5-0) .
(Peck to be absent)
First Trust St. Paul Ad;usted Charges
Peck referred Council to letter of 8/30/85 re adjusted fees charged for
Registrar and Paying Agent Services; expressed concern that the fees have
increased substantially in a very short period of time (less than one month);
asked if City has an option.
McNiesh reported that $4,000 has been budgeted in 1986 ($2,000 in 1985),
before this increase was received; noted that this is the first issue where we
have registered bonds - will research to see if we have an option.
Brice Scott Property - Lake Johanna Blvd
Hansen reported that the driveway was put in, and nothing more has been done.
McNiesh reported that at the time of the hearing the driveway was in;
assumes the Court will require completion of the rest of the work.
League of Minnesota Cities - Senate Bill 1570
Hansen referred Council to Action Alert requesting support of S.1570 which
would permit an exemption from the Federal Fair Labor Standards overtime
pay requirements for state and local employees, permitting the use of compensa-
tory time-off in lieu of overtime compensation.
Hansen moved, seconded by Hicks, that Council adopt Resolution No. 85-45,
A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING SENATE FILE 1570. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0)
Fire Board Meeting
Hansen asked Council's input re aq additional fire station in the south area;
asked if Council feels there is aqeed for four or three stations in the three
cities; asked Council's input re the possible re-location of the New Brighton
Road station to a more centrally located site, askeq if Arden Hills is
served satisfactorily from the two existing stations - are response times
adequate?
It was the general consensus of ~ouncil that Arden Hills keep an open mind
re fire station sites, response time adequacy and other fire protection con-
cerns.
,
-'
.
.
-
. ,
Minutes of Regular Council Meeting, September 9, 1985
Page seven
Lexin~ton Avenue Brid~e Reconstruction
Council reiterated its position that the 2% local share of cost is properly
attributable to Ramsey County rather than to the cities of Shoreview and Arden
Hills.
McNiesh reported that Shoreview has asked MnDOT to change the construction
schedule back to 1986 so Rice Street and Lexington will not be under construc-
tion at the same time.
.
It was noted that the City and State are proposing to improve Hamline Avenue
in 1986; noted that Arden Hills' businesses and residents would be
jeopardized if Lexington and Hamline were both closed. The possibility
of a delay in the Hamline Avenue project, because of the need for surcharging,
was queried. It was noted that this is apparently not a problem; Hamline
is scheduled for construction in 1986 -- surcharging will be completed this
fall. McNiesh was requested to relay to MnDOT that Arden Hills concurs
that the Lexington bridge construction should be delayed until 1987 so that
Lexington and Hamline will not be under construction the same year.
NSP Notification of Rate Increase
Hicks referred Council to letter from St. Paul asking municipalities to
join as a consortium to intervene in the electric rate case.
After discussion, Council concurred that it would. not be involved at this
time.
Community Human Services Department - Representative
Council was referred t request from Ramsey County Community Human Services
Department requesting the City to appoint a representative to a community
involvement task force committee to act in an advisory capacity to the depart-
ment regarding the development and dispersal of residential care facilities.
Council referred the request to the Planning Commission to see if someone
on the Commission would like to volunteer to serve on this new committee,
representing Arden Hills.
REPORT OF VILLAGE CLERK ADMINISTRATOR CHARLOTTE MCNIESH
Application for Payment - Allied Blacktop
Council was referred to Application for Payment for 1985 Sealcoating, recom-
mended for payment by the City Engineer. McNiesh reported that the
$34,235.06 payment represents a 10% retainage.
Hicks moved, seconded by Peck, to authorize the payment. Motion carried
unanimously. (5-0)
Review Schedule - 1986 Proposed Bud~et
McNiesh referred Council to the calendar for the 1986 budget:
September 12 - Finance Committee reviews proposed budget.
September 19 - Joint Finance/Council meeting.
September 30 - Public Hearing - Revenue Sharing Fund Budget. Council
adopts budget and tax levy.
Claims and Payroll
Council was referred to two lists of Claims and two Payrolls.
Hicks moved, seconded by Sather, to approve the Claims and Payrolls as
. presented. Motion carried unanimously. (5-0)
Adjournment
Hansen moved, seconded by Peck, that
Motion ~arried unanimously. (5-0)
~~~
Charlotte McNiesh
Clerk-Administrator
the meeting adjourn at 12:00 midnight.
j(~~
Robert L. Woodburn
Mayor