HomeMy WebLinkAboutCCP 07-08-1996
I ,'fP6
c
I AGENDA
I-
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEETING
NEW BRIGHTON COUNCIL CHAMBERS
I MONDAY, JULY 8,1996, 7:30 P.M.
7:30 P.M. I. Call to order/roll call
I 7:30 P.M. 2. Agenda Adoption
I 7:35 P.M. 3. Approval of Minutes
a. June 10, 1996, Regular Council Meeting
b. June 24, 1996, Regular Council Meeting
I
7:40P.M. 4. Consent Calendar
I a. Claims and Payroll
7:45 P.M. 5. Public Comments
I 7:50 P.M. 6. Unfinished and New Business
a. Planning Case #96-05, Control Data PUD, 4201 North Lexington Avenue
.. b. Metropolitan Council Growth Options
c. Oak A venue Sanitary Sewer Improvement
d. Change Order No. I for 1996 Street Improvement Project
I 8:15 P.M. 7. Administrator Comments
I 8:30 P.M. 8. Council Comments
8:45 P.M. 9. Adjourn
I
The above times may vary depending upon length of issue discussion.
I
I
I
I
~
I
-
I
I
JULY MEETINGS AUGUST MEETINGS -I
July 3 Planning Commission 7:30 P.M. August 7 Planning Commission 7:30 P.M.
July 8 Council Meeting 7:30 P.M. August 12 Council Meeting 7:30 P.M.
July 15 Council Worksession 4:30 P.M. August 15 Public Works/Safety 7:30 P.M. I
July 15 Council Meeting-Special 7:30 P.M. August 19 Council Worksession 4:30 P.M.
July 17 Economic Dev. Committee 8:00 A.M. August 21 Economic Dev. Committee 8:00 A.M. I
July 18 Public Works/Safety 7:30 P.M. August 22 Finance Committee 7:30 P.M.
July 23 Park & Rec. Committee 7:00 P.M. August 26 Council Meeting 7:30 P.M. I
July 25 Finance Committee 7:30 P.M. August 27 Park & Rec. Committee 7:00 P.M.
I
July 29 Council Meeting 7:30 P.M.
I
I
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
---.- -----
I
I CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
~ MEMORANDUM
DATE: July 3,1996
I TO: Mayor and City Council
I FROM: Brian Fritsing~r, City Administrator /~)
SUBJECT: Administrator Comments for July 8, 1996 Regular Council Meeting
I
I 1. Approval of Minutes
The Council is asked to adopt the minutes of the June 10, 1996 and June 24,1996 Regular
Council meetings.
I 2. Consent Calendar
I a. Claims and Payroll
The Council is asked to approve claims and payroll for the period most recently ended in
the amount of$129,246.21. The Council may note payment in the amount of
Ie $47,023.00 to MCES for July sewer charges and $47,043.00 to Ramsey County for July
law enforcement services.
I 3. Unfinished and New Business
I a. Planning Case #96-05. CDC
The Planning Commission has recommended approval of Planning Case #96-05 as
discussed in the staffreport. See the updated memorandum from Mr. Ringwald. Staff
I and Attorney Filla have met with representatives of Control Data and have agreed to
park dedication. It will consist of a long-term lease/easement and land dedication.
I b. Metropolitan Council Growth Options
Several members of the Council have expressed interest in the Metropolitan Council's
discussions regarding the growth options for the Twin Cities. Staff has attempted to
I prepare some background on this issue and a resolution supporting one of those options.
c. Oak Avenue SanitarY Sewer Iml)rovement
I The City contacted three firms for quotes to repair the sanitary sewer line on Oak
Avenue. Two firms provided quotes to complete the repairs. Both firms use a slightly
I different technology to repair the sewer lines. After reviewing the quotes and studying
the techniques suggested, Mr. Stafford and Mr. Stonehouse agree that Buchen
Environmental Services, Inc. should be recommended for selection to perform this work.
,. The total cost is $17,535 and would be paid for out of maintenance funds.
I
i
-------
I
Administrator Comments for July 8, 1996 Regular Council Meeting I
Page 2
July 3, 1996 ..
.
d. Change Order #1. 1996 Street ImDrovements
The engineer has recommended a change order in the amount of$7,3l7.40 for the I
potential replacement ofloop (traffic) detectors on Pine Tree Drive south of the
intersection with County Road E. With the millwork necessary on Pine Tree Drive, it is I
unknown as to the location of these detectors. The change order will only be required
should the detectors be located in the top 1 Y, inches of blacktop. Millwork is expected
to begin next week on Pine Tree Drive. I
I
I
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I~ ..
~. MINUTES DR4Fr
I CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
JUNE 10,1996
I 7:30 P.M. - ARMY RESERVE CENTER
I CALL TO ORDERlROLL CALL
I Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Dennis Probst called to order the regular
City Council meeting at 7:30 p.m.
Present: Mayor Dennis Probst, Councilmembers Beverly Aplikowski, Susan Keim,
I and Paul Malone. .
I Absent: Councilmember Dale Hicks.
Also present were: City Administrator, Brian Fritsinger; City Accountant, Terry Post;
I Public Works Superintendent, Dwayne Stafford; Community Development Director,
Kevin Ringwald; Parks & Recreation Director, Cindy Walsh; City Attorney, Jerry Filla;
City Engineer, Greg Stonehouse; and Recording Secretary, Carla Wirth.
Ie ADOPT AGENDA
I MOTION: Malone moved and Keim seconded a motion to adopt the agenda for the June 10,
1996, Regular City Council meeting as presented. The motion carried
unanimously (4-0).
I CONSENT CALENDAR
I A. Claims and Payroll
I B. Old Highway 10 Shoulder Improvements
C.
Resolution #96-41, Revising Resolution #95-34, Final Assessment Roll Resulting
I from Settlement
MOTION: Malone moved and Keim seconded a motion to approve the Consent CaleJ;ldar as
I presented, and authorize execution of all necessary documents contained therein.
The motion carried unanimously (4-0).
I Malone made reference to the May 20, 1996 letter from the Ramsey County Department of
Public Works regarding their road shoulder paving project and reminder that the City's cost share
~ for shoulder paving Old Highway 10 would be $19,427. He asked if the City would only pay
75% of that cost. Greg Stonehouse, City Engineer, answered affirmatively.
I
.. ~.
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JUNE 10 1996 ()~pr .-
PUBLIC COMMENTS I
Mayor Probst invited the audience to address the Council on any issue not already on the agenda.
There were no public comments. .
UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS
A. Proclamation Congratulating Land 0' Lakes on their 75th Anniversarv I
Since the representative from Land 0' Lakes was not yet present, this item was delayed until later I
in the meeting.
B. Resolution #96-33. Authorizing the Transfer of Roadway Jurisdiction Between I
Ramsey County and the City of Arden Hills
Mr. Stonehouse reviewed Resolution #96-33 which outlines the turnback agreement between .
Arden Hills and Ramsey County. He noted this agreement was reviewed by staff and the
Council during a worksession and describes improvement and maintenance jurisdiction. Mr.
Stonehouse reviewed the streets being transferred to the City are: 0.32 miles of North Hamline I
Avenue form Hamline Avenue to Ingerson Road; and, 0.40 miles ofIngerson Road from North
Hamline Avenue to Lexington Avenue. The streets being transferred to Ramsey County from
the City are: 1.04 miles of Ham line Avenue from County Road F to Ramsey County Highway II
96. Mr. Stonehouse advised that the City brought Hamline Avenue, from County Road F to
Highway 96 to "level 90" sealcoat in 1995 under last year's street project. The City has no .
responsibility to upgrade any roads under the proposed agreement.
Councilmember Malone inquired whether Ramsey County is satisfied with Hamline Avenue. I
Mr. Stonehouse answered affirmatively and advised Ramsey County adopted a similar resolution
last week.
MOTION: Malone moved and Keim seconded a motion to adopt Resolution No. 96-33, I
Authorizing the Transfer of Roadway Jurisdiction Between Ramsey County and
the City of Arden Hills. The motion carried unanimously (4-0). I
C. Resolution #96-37. Disestablishing and Establishinl! Municipal State Aid Streets
Mayor Probst asked if the proposed resolution results in removing streets currently on the I
Municipal State Aid (MSA) system. Mr. Stonehouse explained it will establish North Hamline
Avenue from Hamline Avenue to Ingerson Road; and, Ingerson Road from North Hamline .
A venue to Lexington A venue, as MSA streets. He reviewed the MSA allotment and noted the
jurisdiction transfer will result in a gain of 0.32 undesignated miles in addition to approximately
0.83 miles gained in turnback miles from Ramsey County. This amount, combined with I
approximately 0.64 miles of un designated MSA mileage from 1995, results in approximately
1.79 miles ofMSA roadway to be designated by the City in 1996. He recommended the Council --
determine, later this year, where surplus mileage should be designated.
.
I. ..
I ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JUNE 10. 1996 D.;p
~ MOTION: Malone moved and Keim seconded a motion to adopt Resolution No. 96-37, 41:,.
Disestablishing and Establishing Municipal State Aid Streets. The motion carried
I unanimously (4-0).
D. Resolution #96-34a. Adopting Final Assessment Roll 15 Years Amortization) For
I Parcels 20. 33. 34 and 38 ofthe Reconstruction Improvements Project: and Parcel
46 of the Bituminous Overlav Project
I Mayor Probst inquired regarding whether any of the interested residents will be present at the
meeting tonight. Mr. Stonehouse stated he does not anticipate any will be present. Mayor Probst
determined to delay this agenda item for a few minutes to allow an opportunity for them to
I attend.
A. Proclamation Conl!ratulating Land 0' Lakes on their 75th Anniversary
I MOTION: Malone moved and Keim seconded a motion to adopt a proclamation
congratulating Land 0' Lakes on their 75th Anniversary. The motion carried
I unanimously (4-0).
.. Mayor Probst read in full the Proclamation congratulating Land 0' Lakes on their 75th
Anniversary and extending the City's appreciation for their outstanding contribution to the City
of Arden Hills.
. Terry Nagle thanked the City for this recognition and stated they have been happy being located
in Arden Hills for the past 15 years. He added that they have enjoyed being a corporate citizen
I of Arden Hills and able to contribute to the high standard of living that the City enjoys.
Mayor Probst extended the City's appreciation for their participation on the Arden Hills
I Economic Development Committee and TCAAP Re-Utilization Committee.
F. Planning Case #96-01. Park Dedication for Amble Subdivision. 1211 Amble Road
I Cindy Walsh, Parks & Recreation Director, advised that, as directed by Council, staff
I reconsidered the park dedication for Amble Division. She explained the previous park
dedication was calculated according to the fair market value of the property, which was
determined by the appraisal price of$147,000. Based on this calculation, the park dedication
I fee for Lot I and 3 was $8,820, but the Council was concerned that the appraisal price did not
reflect the true undeveloped acquisition cost of the land. Staff reconsidered and revised the park
dedication fee by basing it on the value of the property as determined by the 1996 tax roles
I (which does not include buildings, improvements, and the portion of property that is under water
and 1mbuildable). Ms. Walsh reviewed the revised calculations which determined a park
f' dedication on Lot I of$2,246.95 and Lot 3 of$I,376.97, for a total of $3,623.92. It was noted
that since Lots 2 and 4 have existing structures, the park dedication was recalculated only for
Lots I and 3. Mr. Amble stated that he is comfortable with the Staffrecommendation.
I
.. .1
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL. JUNE 10. 1996 b~ ~j:'J.i I
MOTION: Malone moved and Aplikowski seconded a motion to approve a park dedication -.
fee in the amount of$3,623.9l for Planning Case #96-01, Amble Subdivision,
121 Amble Road. The motion carried unanimously (4-0).
G. Resolution #96-40 Approving Plans and Specifications and Authorizing I
Advertisement of Bids for the Old Highwa)' 10 Watermain Improvement I
Mr. Stonehouse presented the completed plans of the Old Highway 10 watermain project and
used an overhead to point out the location of the watermain and sanitary sewer. He noted the I
problem at 4355 Old Highway 10 and that the base of the trees is 15 to 18 feet above the existing
pavement elevation. Mr. Stonehouse explained that the existing sanitary sewer main lies parallel
to the edge of the roadway, approximately 8 to 10 feet west of the pavement edge. Since State I
standards call for a 1 O-foot horizontal separation between sanitary sewer lines and watermains,
staff recommends the watermain be installed approximately 20 feet west of the roadway edge.
To protect and avoid disturbing the large pine trees, he recommended the use of a trench box. I
Mr. Stonehouse advised that this may increase job costs by approximately $5,000 but will save a
substantial number of trees and will keep the project within the right-of-way.
Mayor Probst pointed out the proposed resolution also establishes a special meeting on July 15, I
1996 to deal with receipt and authorization of the contract to allow the City to meet the County's
schedule for the proposed project. eI
MOTION: Malone moved and Aplikowski seconded a motion to adopt Resolution No. 96-
40, Approving Plans and Specifications and Authorizing Advertisement of Bids I
for the Old Highway 10 Watermain Improvement. The motion carried
unanimously (4-0). I
H. Welsh Concept Pronosal
Kevin Ringwald, Community Development Director, advised that the staff has been working I
with the Welsh Companies on their plans to develop in the Gateway Business District. He
reviewed their proposed development of approximately 500,000 square feet, primarily I
commercial/industrial with an emphasis on office/warehouse on the northern half of the Gateway
Business District. Mr Ringwald pointed out the adjoining streets, existing rail spur, and the
alignment of Butcher Street. Currently, Welsh Companies has acquired the property for .
buildings A and B and has submitted purchase agreements on building sites D and E. Building C
is proposed on the property owned by the City.
With regard to Butcher Street, Mr. Ringwald explained the developer intends to relocate the I
roadway similar to previous designs. He noted the road will act as a transition area between I
office and light-industrial/office uses. The developer intends to use the existing roadway
(Butcher Street) as a service area for the backs of the buildings (Butcher Street). This road
terminates to provide access to the property directly to the east. ..
.
I ..
4o~
I ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JUNE 10. 1996 \I. _ LJ::~
I- I
Mr. Ringwald advised there are several issues to address. Welsh Companies has submitted a
preliminary sketch and hired a planning consultant to develop more detailed plans. He asked the
Council to address the City parcel which lies in the center of this proposal and the vacation and
I relocation of Butcher Street. Mr. Ringwald explained that currently, the utilities are within
Butcher Street so the proposed configuration is cost effective and saves the existing City
I services. The sanitary sewer cuts through the site somewhat and there is a need to look at the
relationship of that to the southerly building. Lastly, there are remnant strips of property owned
by Naegele which are located on the far western corner of the site and the south edge of Butcher
I Street. The developer is requesting the City to use its police powers to acquire these small strips
of land so they can be developed with access to public streets.
I Mr. Ringwald recommended the Council authorize staff to proceed with negotiations, pursue a
purchase agreement with Welsh on the City property, and research the possibility of acquiring
the small remnant of land adjacent to the Pentair property which is owned by Naegele.
I Mayor Probst stated he was delighted to see some activity on this site but wants to raise some
issues to address with Welsh. He commented on the need to look at the "bigger picture" and
I potential impact on the rest of the site. Mayor Probst stated he understands this is a concept plan
but he wants to make sure any recommendation to proceed with negotiations is not construed to
mean approval of anything else. Mayor Probst stated he supports the concept of this proposal;
.. however, questions the feasibility to construct this amount of one-level square footage on this
site.
. Mr. Ringwald advised that staff did raise several issues with this proposal which Welsh will need
to address.
I Brian Fritsinger, City Administrator, reviewed past negotiations with Welsh and the resulting
expansion of their development proposal to incorporate additional parcels. He stated the Mayor's
I points are well taken and staff has worked with Welsh on the proposed site plan and building
aesthetics.
I Mayor Probst asked if this party is able to put these properties together for development. Mr.
Ringwald responded that they are.
I Councilmember Malone noted the Council will have to take a serious look at Round Lake,
review past considerations to the parkway plan, and know what the costs will be. He inquired
whether the ,Ieveloper is looking for assistance; Mr. Ringwald advised the developer has not
I brought up this issue and if raised, staff has indicated the City would first consider assistance
towards development of the infrastructure and land acquisition. Once those two items are
I considered, then assistance for building design will be reviewed. Councilmember Malone
indicated support of the preliminary proposal.
,. Mr. Ringwald advised the developer would probably choose to proceed with Building A first
since all utilities are currently available to that site.
I
.. I
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JUNE 10. 1996 D.i~4 ,. "" I
f. "y
Mayor Probst pointed out that reconstruction of Highway 96 will be underway and, hopefully, -I
Ramsey County will recognize this proposed development in their construction plans. Mr.
Ringwald estimated that the timing of the development will allow those issues to be addressed.
Council member Aplikowski aS,ked if the developer has identified any tenants. Mr. Ringwald I
explained Welsh will own and lease this office space to tenants. He added that staff has provided .
them with the District standards and emphasized that aesthetics will be a focal point so they will
need to provide transition towards the higher office standards. Mr. Ringwald stated he believes
that they have been sensitized to the aesthetics issue. .
Councilmember Keim commented on the need for access to Highway 96 and suggested Ramsey
County be so informed. Mr. Ringwald agreed with the need to improve the access in the GBD. I
Mr. Fritsinger advised this is one of the 13 items staff has identified which need to be addressed.
Councilmember Malone inquired the status of the Vaughn site. Mr. Ringwald advised Mr. I
Vaughn is researching the development of his own property and has retained professional
consultants in that endeavor.
MOTION: Malone moved and Aplikowski seconded a motion to direct staff to continue I
negotiations with Welsh Companies on the concept proposal for the Gateway
Business District. research future issues for sale of City property, vacation and ..
relocation of Butcher Street, investigate and seek professional help with potential
condemnation proceedings and negotiate a development agreement for Council
review. The motion carried unanimously (4-0), I
I. Met Council Environmental Services Grant Application I
Dwayne Stafford, Public Works Superintendent, noted his memo from several months ago which I
identifies the need to televise the sanitary sewer system to identify potential inflow and
infiltration problems. He reported there is now a new matching grant program from MCES to
provide $10,000 grants to cities that submit information proving they need the grant money for I
this work. Also, MCES will be providing loans of up to $40,000 to correct problem areas
identified when the sanitary sewer system was televised. These loans may be forgiven with
proof of permanent corrections and the City may seek these funds at a later date. I
Mr. Stafford explained that due to the age of the sewer system and type of construction and pipe
used, he believes some problem areas will be identified. He requested Council permission to I
seek any and all grant monies available through this program.
Councilmember Malone agreed there may be an infiltration problem in the Old Highway 10 area. I
Mr. Stafford stated he is unsure but has reviewed plans with Mr. Stonehouse and Mr. Post to
decide which areas would be the most likely to have infiltration problems and selected those ..
areas to begin with.
.
----.--
. ..
Dlr~
I ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JUNE 10. 1996 .7-6."}....
.., ""t
f'
MOTION: Aplikowski moved and Keim seconded a motion to authorize submittal of the Met
Council Environmental Services Grant Application. The motion passed
unanimously (4-0).
I D. Resolution #96-34a. Adopting Final Assessment Roll (5 Years Amortization) For
I Parcels 20. 33. 34 and 38 of the Reconstruction Improvements Proiect: and Parcel
46 of the Bituminous Overlay Proiect
I Mayor Probst noted no residents were present to address this issue.
Mr. Stonehouse explained there are six remaining assessments to be determined and then used an
I overhead to point out the locations of these properties. He explained the issues are as follows:
James D. Johnson, 1535 Lake Johanna: This property has access from Lake Johanna Boulevard
I and owner believes he receives "no" benefit from the Oak Avenue improvement. Mr.
Stonehouse advised this assessment was calculated in accordance with the City's current policy
and there was no means within the policy to adjust this assessment.
I Eugene D. Schinidt, 1628 Chatham Avenue: This property has access from Chatham Avenue
and owner believes the street should have been overlaid in 1991. Mr. Stonehouse explained this
Ie is a corner lot and Mr. Schmidt believes the odd-shaped lot calculation resulted in an inordinately
high assessment. Mr. Stonehouse further explained Mr. Schmidt's comments related to the
I corner lot calculations so he explained the assessment calculation. Mr. Schmidt now understands
the formula but remains concerned that the last segment of McCracken Lane was not overlaid in
1991 when the rest of that segment was overlaid.
I David Barnier, 1624 Chatham Avenue: This property has access from Chatham Avenue and
drainage problems that will be evaluated and corrected if possible. Mr. Stonehouse explained
I this is a corner lot and Mr. Barnier does not believe he should be assessed for McCracken Lane.
Also, Mr. Barnier is also concerned with the cost of the project since he has nine children and has
concerns about being able to pay college tuition.
I Rhonda Behr, 1401 County Road E: Owner states a previous street assessment was successfully
appealed during construction of Arden Oaks Drive. Mr. Stonehouse explained this property is a
I corner lot with access from County Road E and would be assessed $561 for side yard
improvements on Arden Oaks. Mr. Stonehouse advised he informed Ms. Behr that the City did
not have an Assessment Policy at the time she successfully appealed an assessment 10 or II
I years ago when Arden Oaks was constructed, and the proposed assessment is calculated
according to the adopted Assessment Policy. Ms. Behr then suggested, because of the
I Assessment Policy change, she should be grandfathered from paying this assessment and that
other residents on County Road E should also be grandfathered.
~
I
----------
...10. '.
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JUNE 10. 1996 D'/'f.:;)8/>, , I
~ .c:i~'
I'{'
Ronald Christianson, 1428 Arden Oaks Court: Owner believes his property is being double -.
assessed for improvements on both Pascal Avenue and Arden Oaks Court. Mr. Stonehouse
recommended a reduction in the assessment to reflect the actual footage of the improvement
along Pascal A venue. He reported that Mr. Christianson appeared to be satisfied with this .
resolution.
Steve and Carol Herbst, 3799 McCracken Lane: O"'TIer believes that assessment calculation is I
higher than the average since it is a large lot with a sewer easement across the backyard. Mr.
Stonehouse stated he was unable to reach the Herbsts but believes this lot has two issues: the
Assessment Policy calculation for odd-shaped lots; and, the sanitary sewer easement crossing the .
rear corner lot, resulting in a net "loss" of about 28% of buildable lot area. Mr. Stonehouse
explained there is currently no means to reduce this assessment under the City's Assessment I
Policy.
Mr. Stonehouse stated he spoke with all residents except Steven and Carol Herbst with respect to I
what his recommendation to Council would be. He summarized his recommendation is that the
assessment is prepared correctly for the four corner lots and there is no means within the City's
Assessment Policy to make a change. The City will address the drainage issues with the Barnier I
property. With the Christensen property, Mr. Stonehouse recommended a reduction in the
assessment to reflect the actual footage of improvement along Pascal A venue, as was used for all
other Pascal residents. This yields revised assessment amounts of$I,168.53 for the Pascal ..
Avenue reconstruction and $257.13 for the Arden Oaks Court overlay portion.
Mr. Stonehouse stated he informed these residents they could attend the meeting tonight to I
address the Council but they felt comfortable in having him convey their concerns.
Mr. Filla advised that since the district court records of the Behr assessment appeal are at least 10 I
years old, the court destroyed them so they are not available to add light to that assessment
appeal; however, the appeal was prior to the City's current Assessment Policy. I
Mr. Stonehouse suggested, on the Roach assessment at 1628 Oak Avenue, that the assessable
footage be reduced to 148.75 feet and the assessment to $4,510.10 based on deep lot calculation .
versus odd-shaped lot calculation.
Council member Aplikowski questioned when the Assessment Policy was adopted. Mr. Probst I
answered it was in October of 1990. Councilmember Aplikowski stated no one should be
"grandfathered" from special assessments because it would establish an adverse precedent.
Councilmember Malone, for the record, reviewed staffs recommendation for each property under I
consideration and stated he believes it is appropriate.
Mr. Filla advised it would be appropriate for the Council to consider each of the seven parcels I
and either reject or accept the appeal, then consider the proposed resolution. ..
I
I ..
/)''0
'I d.(".,'_"
',," ,..,
I ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JUNE 10. 1996 . 1; :~.. ~';~ f'>Q ~'; .
"~i'>l'
.-
Mayor Probst inquired regarding the reduction in assessment if the sewer easement area is
deducted from the Herbst property and the assessment calculated on the odd-shaped method. Mr.
Stonehouse advised the assessment would be reduced by 28% to 30%. Mayor Probst stated he
. would support this revision since the easement reduces the buildable or developable area of that
lot.
I Councilmember Malone reviewed the reductions as proposed by staff and asked if the Herbst
property assessment would be calculated on square footage with a 100 foot depth. Mr.
I Stonehouse used an overhead to diagram the alignment of the utility right-of-way and stated it
could be calculated as an odd-shaped lot. Council member Malone concurred with the suggestion
to calculate the assessment without the easement square footage included.
I Mr. Filla advised the Assessment Policy indicates the City may reserve the right to remove land
if located within an easement and determined it cannot be developed in the future.
I MOTION: Malone moved and Aplikowski seconded a motion to deny the appeal of
Resolution No. 96-36 of two parcels set aside at last meeting; move to accept the
I appeal of Virginia Roach, 1628 Oak A venue, and adjust the foot footage to
148.75; and deny the appeal of James D. Johnson, 1535 Lake Johanna Boulevard,
because benefit is properly assessed. The motion carried unanimously 4-0.
.. MOTION: Malone moved and Aplikowski seconded a motion to accept the appeal of
I Resolution No. 96-34 by Ronald Christianson, 1438 Arden Oaks Court, to Pascal
Avenue and adjust front footage to 38.5 feet; with Ronald Christianson, 1438
Arden Oaks Court, to adjust for footage on Arden Oaks resurfacing to 47.44 feet;
I with Eugene D. Schmidt, 1628 Chatham Avenue, and David Barnier, 1624
Chatham A venue, to deny the appeal of assessments to those two properties since
they are properly assessed; with Steven and Carol Herbst, 3799 McCracken Lane,
I to accept their appeal and direct the City Engineer to recalculate the assessment
and deduct the square footage of the triangular section between the sewer
easement and lot lines and adjust the assessment accordingly; and with Rhonda
I Behr, 1401 County Road E, to deny her appeal and find that property is properly
assessed at 103.5 feet. The motion carried unanimously 4-0.
I MOTION: Aplikowski moved and Keim seconded a motion to adopt Resolution No. 96-34a,
Adopting Final Assessment Roll (5 Years Amortization) For Parcels 20, 33, 34
and 38 of the Reconstruction Improvements Project; and Parcel 46 of the
. Bituminous Overlay Project. The motion carried unanimously (4-0).
I
it
I
--------- ---
"1
9) -_.~,
4'~d<, ,::...)
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JUNE 10. 1996 .. {LO'J;~. I
E. Resolution #96-36a. Adopting: Final Assessment Roll (8 Years Amortization) For _.
Parcels 3 and 11 .
MOTION: Aplikowski moved and Keim seconded a motion to adopt Resolution No. 96-36a, I
Adopting Final Assessment Roll (8 Years Amortization) For Parcels 3 and 11.
The motion carried unanimously (4-0).
ADMINISTRATOR COMMENTS .
Mr. Fritsinger noted the County Road F construction project and concern about the slow pace by I
Midwest Asphalt to complete the long punch list. He advised staff has discussed this issue and
recommended the Council consider imposing a $450 per day penalty for not completing this
work by July 1st. It was noted this is a contractual requirement. Council consensus was reached I
to direct staff to so inform Midwest Asphalt.
Mr. Fritsinger commented on the need to encourage Ramsey County to place the Tony Schmidt I
Park on their CIP priority list. He explained there have been some changes in Ramsey County
park funding and suggested the City encourage them to move the Tony Schmidt Park to the top
of their list by having Mayor Probst forward a letter to the County Commissioners to make this .
request for 1997. Mr Fritsinger also suggested the City hold a neighborhood meeting later this
fall (as Ramsey County approaches their budget process) to gather more support for that action.
Mayor Probst stated his concurrence with Mr. Fritsinger's suggestion and intention to send ..
Ramsey County a letter congratulating them for funding other projects and encouraging them to I
now consider the Tony Schmidt Park.
COUNCIL COMMENTS I
Council member Keim advised that due to another commitment, she will be unable to attend the
June 12, 1996, Human Rights Commission meeting. I
Council member Keim commented on the Perry Park opening and added it was a wonderful time.
Mayor Probst indicated he was disappointed at the limited press coverage of this park opening, I
especially considering the large announcement of this event. Councilmember Aplikowski
explained the Park and Recreation Committee is hoping to hold an opening each year at a
different park. .
Councilmember Aplikowski updated the Council regarding the newsletter articles. She advised I
she is planning to go to Rochester and that this event is well attended by Fridley representatives
so she hopes to be joined by others from Arden Hills.
Mayor Probst inquired regarding the County Road F punch list items and expressed similar I
concerns with the Stowe Avenue project which is not completed. Mr. Stonehouse explained
about one-half of the punch list is completed and staff is talking with the contractor on a weekly ..
I
---- --------
I ...,
Ie ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JUNE 10. 1996 /'...') ~j .
4i <1'."'"
b . hi' M P b I' d h' . b' d' 'h rl'
I as IS to encourage t em to comp ete project. ayor ro st exp ame t e nprap IS now une m
sand and needs to be addressed.
I Mayor Probst reported that four mayors and staff continue to meet quarterly to address a number
of issues including the proposed National Sports Center quad hockey arena proposed to be
located in Blaine. He explained there will be more information presented on this issue but he is
I not optimistic this project will obtain the support needed to move forward since the deadline is
July 15th so it may need to be delayed a year. Mayor Probst stated a question was raised if there
I should be City support to provide a better benefit to the Mounds View and lrondale schools by
considering the option to locate a facility within Arden Hills via the use of TCAAP property.
This question may be further discussed with the National Guard.
I Mayor Probst indicated TCAAP has pledged support of an athletic field so letters are being
written regarding this matter to Congressman Vento.
I Mayor Probst reported there was an AMM mailing and they are looking for members to serve on
the policy committee. He requested input from Councilmembers if they know anyone who may
I be interested. Mr. Fritsinger advised that he will serve on LMC committees and Mr. Post has
submitted his name to serve on the revenues committee.
-- Mayor Probst announced the Suburban Chamber of Commerce meeting this Wednesday.
Councilmember Aplikowski thanked staff members who were responsible for working with
I residents to satisfy their concern regarding assessments.
ADJOURN
I MOTION: Malone moved and Keim seconded a motion to adjourn the meeting at 8:50 p.m.
I The motion carried unanimously (4-0).
I Dennis Probst Brian Fritsinger
Mayor City Administrator
I NOTICE OF MEETINGS
I The next regular City Council meeting will be held June 24, 1996, at 7:30 p.m. at New Brighton
City Hall.
~
I
I' ..
~. DR4Fr
I
MINUTES
I CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
JUNE 24, 1996
I 7:30 P.M. - NEW BRIGHTON COUNCIL CHAMBERS
I CALL TO ORDERlROLL CALL
I Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Dennis Probst called to order the regular
City Council meeting at 7:30 p.m.
. Present: Mayor Dennis Probst, Councilmembers Beverly Aplikowski, Dale Hicks,
and Paul Malone.
I Absent: Councilmember Susan Keirn
.. Also present were: City Administrator, Brian Fritsinger; Community Development
Director, Kevin Ringwald; Parks & Recreation Director, Cindy Walsh; City Attorney,
Jerry Filla; Public Works Superintendent, Dwayne Stafford, and Recording Secretary,
I Carla Wirth.
ADOPT AGENDA
I Mayor Probst noted the addition of agenda item 6h regarding condemnation related to the Oak
A venue reconstruction project.
I MOTION: Hicks moved and Aplikowski seconded a motion to adopt the agenda for the
June 24, 1996, Regular City Council meeting as revised. The motion carried
I unanimously (4-0).
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
I May 28, 1996, Regular Council Meeting
. Page 2, first paragraph, first line: "He stated that five fire hydrants are to be
installed, in the Old Highway 10 area, serving 19 residents."
I Page 2, second to last line: "Mr. Stonehouse replied that the utility poles would
f' cither be supported or moved, but the utilities would not be placed underground."
I
--
III 'I
o\tfl.~\
.1
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JUNE 24. 1996 2
I
Page 3, last paragraph, next to last line: "He stated that McCracken Lane
rehabilitation would be assessed at $16.44 per front foot, Ridgewood Court I
recycling assessment would be $8.80 per front foot, and the routine bituminous
overlays would be assessed at $5.42 per front foot." I
Page 4, first paragraph: "...and noted that a resident's portion of property taxes
would have to be increased by approximately ~ pcrcent ifthe City did not have an I
Assessment Policy."
Jun., 17, 1996, Council Worksession Meeting: I
Page 1, Roundtable Discussion, third paragraph: "The Council discussed the merits
of a task force versus committee arrangement." I
Page 2, Item a: "Council indicated that staff may want to consider purchasing new
computers rather than upgrading the current system and may get on a 36 month I
schedule of replacement."
Page 3, last sentence: "The Council elected not to create a formal committee until a ..
later date."
With regard to the newsletter discussion, Councilmember Aplikowski stated her impression that I
the Council agreed it would be a monthly newsletter and that the Council had only made
suggestions for consideration by the committee. Mayor Probst stated his recollection that there I
was a general consensus to go in the direction reflected in the minutes.
Mayor Probst encouraged staff to keep the city hall RFQ process as tight as possible. With I
regard to discussion of the Country Road F name change, Mayor Probst advised it is not the
Council's intention to only investigate the notification process, but to also determine what would
be appropriate in terms of notification. I
MOTION: Hicks moved and Malone seconded a motion to approve the May 28, 1996,
Regular Council Meeting minutes and the June 17, 1996, Council Worksession I
Meeting minutes as corrected. The motion carried unanimously (4-0).
CONSENT CALENDAR .
A. Claims and Payroll
MOTION: Malone moved and Aplikowski seconded a motion to approve the Consent I
Calendar as presented, and authorize execution of all necessary documents ..
contained therein. The motion carried unanimously (4-0).
I
I .
~. DR4f:
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JUNE 24. 1996 3"
I
I PUBLIC COMMENTS
I Mayor Probst invited the audience to address the Council on any issue not already on the agenda.
Walter Bieger, 1689 West County Road F, addressed the Council regarding their intention to
I rename West County Road F since it is no longer a County roadway. He reviewed the time
consuming and costly efforts involved for residents and businesses when their address is changed
and requested that the Council consider a name which is not very different, such as West Country
I Road or West Country Road F. Mr. Bieger submitted results of a survey he conducted of West
County Road F residents which indicated six support a name change to West Country Road F,
six support West Country Road (without F) and five support leaving the name as it is.
I Mayor Probst explained the Council had discussed this issue at a worksession and he supports a
name change since West County Road F is no longer a County road and it is appropriate to take
I some ownership of the street as a City. He reviewed the previous attempts to survey residents
and reach a consensus on a new name.
.. Ms. Billie Schacht, 1683 West County Road F, noted these same residents have already had
their address changed three times due to a change in the community name. She stated that she
I appreciates consideration of the name "Farrell Drive" since Mr. Farrell was the previous owner
of the land in this area; however, it would be better for residents if the name is something closer
to the current name.
I Dorothy Raetz, 1703 West County Road F, stated that while she does not like the current
name, she supports leaving it as is or to make only a minor change.
I Tom Goserud, Arden Hills Nursery, 4340 and 4350 Hamline Avenue, explained that due to
the bridge closing he would like to request permission to erect signs regarding his business at
I four intersections. He advised he has discussed this with staff, but they only indicated
permission for a sign at Hamline Avenue and Highway 96, from Thursday p.m. through Monday
a.m.. Mr. Goserud requested Council's consideration of his sign request until the bridge reopens.
I Mayor Probst suggest this be discussed further as first item under Unfinished and New Business.
I There were no other public comments at this time.
I
it
I
-- ----..------
.. I
~rxf\ .-
o ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JUNE 24. 1996 4
I
UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS
AA. Directional Signs for Home Businesses During Bridge Closing I
Kevin Ringwald, Community Development Director, explained staff provided direction to Mr. .
Goserud that a sign along Hamline Avenue similar to a garage sale sign would be acceptable
during the road construction. However, Mr. Goserud's signs remained up longer and in I
additional locations. He explained that Mr. Goserud's SUP and the Sign Code do not permit off-
premise signs. He further explained that the bridge will be reopened prior to the City's ability to
act on a formal appeal to the Code action, should Mr. Goserud make such application. .
Mayor Probst explained one of the issues of concern is that Mr. Goserud operates a home
occupation and the nature of his sign request would "stretch" the SUP. He expressed concern I
with how broadly the City should consider distribution of signs since a home occupancy business
is involved. Also, the City may receive similar requests from other home occupation businesses.
Mayor Probst pointed out that home occupations are to be limited activity that do not require the I
type of signs being requested by Mr. Goserud. He indicated he is not interested in extending sign
permission much further than at Hamline Avenue and Highway 96.
Mr. Goserud stated that while he understands these concerns, he believes extenuating ..
circumstances exist since the road is closed.
Councilmember Hicks inquired regarding the specific sign size and locations being requested. I
Mr. Goserud stated currently he only has signs in his yard but is requesting permission to erect I
similar signs (2' x 4') at the intersections of Hamline A venue and Highway 96, Lexington
Avenue and Highway 96, Lexington Avenue and County Road F, and Hamline Avenue and
County Road F. He explained he is currently having a plant clearance so he would like to add .
that notation and add 40% off to the signs. Mr. Goserud explained the short time available to sell
plantings and his desire to capture the customer's attention.
Councilmember Malone concurred it would be a "stretch" to consider this number of I
intersections and noted that Mr. Goserud already has four signs in his yard when only one is
permitted. He asked Mr. Goserud ifhe would abide by the limit established by the Council and I
not extend the number beyond that approval. Mr. Goserud answered affirmatively.
Councilmember Malone noted there are other home occupation that may make a similar request I
and not abiding by the limit involves an enforcement problem. He indicated support to consider
several signs if the duration is very limited, for the next week or two, until the bridges open.
Councilmember Aplikowski stated she appreciates the value of signs but concurs with I
Councilmember Malone that there is a tendency to erect additional signs in other locations. She ..
stated she would support the request if only for a limited time.
I
I. ...
DR4Fr
~. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JUNE 24. 1996 5
.
Councilmember Hicks indicated support as long as the signs are removed immediately when the
I bridge is reopened.
I Mayor Probst advised that the Council's consensus is to allow the signs to remain in place until
the bridge reopens but then they must be removed.
I Brian Fritsinger, City Administrator, advised the City will probably receive a similar request
from another home occupation. Council consensus was reached that a similar request would be
approved under the same restrictions.
I A. Extension of OneCoffim Agreement
I Mr. Ringwald advised the site plan approval was previously extended for six months and will
expire on June 30, 1996. OneComm has proposed to place transmission antennas at the Red Fox
Road watertower but due to nationwide buildout demands, is requesting another extension to
I December 31, 1996. Mr. Ringwald noted that OneComm has offered to commence rent
payments on July I, 1996 at $750 ($862 for the second five years) per month for the first five
years. Mr. Ringwald advised staff recommends approval of Planning Case 95-01 to extend site
.. plan approval until December 31, 1996, subject to the original conditions and with payment of
rent commencing on July 1, 1996.
I Mayor Probst asked if the previously discussed contract was for five years. Mr. Ringwald
answered affirmatively.
I Councilmember Malone asked if this organization has changed hands since the original
application was negotiated. Bill Buell, representing OneComm, advised that C-Call Corporation
. is the licensee dba as OneComm. He further explained that C-Call merged with NexTell, making
it a nation-wide company. Councilmember Malone reviewed issues previously discussed to
minimize visual impact and asked if OneComm is proposing the same. Mr. Buell answered
I affirmatively.
MOTION: Hicks moved and Malone seconded a motion that approval of Planning Case
I #95-0 I be extended until December 31, 1996, subject to the original conditions of
approval and payment of rent commencing on July 1, 1996. The motion carried
unanimously (4-0).
I
I
it
I
. ..
~~
i'\.~(' .
. Q "~;l.
Q\''<. :RDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JUNE 24. 1996
6 -.
B. Resolution #96-42, Approving Local Performance Aid
Mr. Fritsinger explained that d)lring the 1996 Legislative Session, the State adopted a law which I
provides for a new state aid for all cities beginning in calendar year 1997. The proposed
resolution states the City is in the process of developing a system of performance measures I
acceptable by the State of Minnesota under this new law. It will also allow the City to qualify
for LPA should it be available in 1997. Currently, the Arden Hills' aid is estimated at
approximately $10,577. I
Mayor Probst questioned the deadline for submission of the performance standards. Mr. I
Fritsinger advised there is currently no deadline date but he assumes it will be around
July 1, 1997.
Councilmember Hicks asked if the $10,000 of aid is an annual payment. Mr. Fritsinger answered I
affirmatively. Councilmember Hicks questioned the amount of staff time involved to create
performance standards. Mr. Fritsinger stated he has not prepared a calculation but it may not be I
very time consuming since, typically, the work is tied with the budget process where goals are
identified. Councilmember Hicks stated he generally supports this recommendation as long as
staff time involvement does not exceed the benefit. ..
Councilmember Aplikowski concurred and questioned the value if the data must be changed
every two years. Mr. Fritsinger explained that this new aid may be an attempt by the State of .
Minnesota to phase out HAC A and LGA over time.
Councilmember Malone stated the City already has performance measures and abides by a I
budget to operate in a healthy manner. He expressed concern with the Legislature's implication
that Arden Hills does not already have these "performance measures" but noted it appears these I
measures must be established to apply for the $10,000 aid.
Mayor Probst concurred and inquired whether the third "WHEREAS" of the proposed resolution I
should be removed.
Instead, Councilmember Malone suggested the second "WHEREAS" be revised to state: I
"WHEREAS, in order to qualify for this new aid, the City must develop a system of performance
measures in compliance with the Law of 1996. Chapter 471. Article 3. Section 48." He noted
this removes the inference that Arden Hills does not already have established performance I
standards. Council agreed.
MOTION: Malone moved and Hicks seconded a motion to adopt Resolution #96-42, I
Approving the Local Performance Aid, as amended. The motion carried
unanimously (4-0). ..
I
I ..
~e Dl?4Fr
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JUNE 24.1996 7
I
C. Resolution #96-26, Approving Metropolitan Livable Communities Act Action Plan
I for 1996
Mr. Ringwald explained the City is required, under the Metropolitan Liveable Communities Act,
I to prepare an action plan to met the established housing goals which were negotiated in 1995
with the Metropolitan Council. Staff continues to support the premise that Arden Hills' goals
I and action plan should be directly linked to the future redevelopment ofTCAAP.
Councilmember Aplikowski questioned the impact without TCAAP. Mr. Ringwald explained it
I would be more difficult and staff would have to determine how affordable housing goals can be
met on a lot-by-lot basis. He suggested this is why the Met Council endorsed the use of TCAAP,
to assure meaningful implementation of the Liveable Communities Act.
I Mayor Probst noted that because of TCAAP, under the current definition, Arden Hills is
classified as a "developing community". Mr. Ringwald stated this is correct.
I Councilmember Aplikowski asserted that this is a "heavy handed" requirement and in theory she
is opposed but in reality she will support it.
-- MOTION: Malone moved and Hicks seconded a motion to adopt Resolution #96-26,
Approving the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act Action Plan for 1996. The
I motion carried unanimously (4-0).
D. Resolution #96-06, Tousley Front Yard Variance, 3248 Sandeen Road
I
Mr. Ringwald explained that Herb Tousley of 3248 Sandeen Road is requesting a front and side
I yard variance. The front yard setback being requested is 35 feet, when 40 feet is required and the
side yard setback being requested varies from approximately 2.7 feet to 4 feet, when 5 feet is
required. It was noted the Planning Commission unanimously recommends approval of the
I variance requests with the following conditions:
1. If the building is damaged or destroyed by any cause in excess of fifty percent (50%) of
I the fair market value of said building, as determined by the building inspector, then the
side yard (north property line) setback variance as explicitly shown would become null
and void, and
I 2. City Council consideration of the proposed site plan, including the exterior elevations of
the proposed addition.
I
('
I
.. cl
~~~
,.1
~.'~
\) ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JUNE 24. 1996 8
I
Mayor Probst inquired whether a precedent has been established on Sandeen Road. Mr.
Ringwald confirmed the precedent and reviewed the two previously approved variance requests I
and side yard setback on Ridg;;wood Court which extended a non-conforming wall.
Council member Malone noted the height was of concern and questioned how much higher the I
addition will be. Mr. Ringwald indicated it is not meaningfully higher.
Herb Tousley, applicant, stated he is aware of the conditions for approval and has nothing to add I
to staffs report. Councilmember Malone commented on the loss of the side yard variance if the
building is damaged or destroyed in excess of 50%. He explained if this were to happen, the .
applicant would need to rebuild the house. Mr. Tousley stated he is aware of this condition.
Councilmember Aplikowski asked if there will be living area above the garage. Mr. Tousley I
stated there is living area over the existing garage and this area will be extended over the
addition.
Councilmember Hicks noted that on the drawing you cannot determine how the existing garage I
roof line will change. He noted the back porch corner area appears to be enclosed. Mr. Tousley
advised it is a screen porch and will remain as it is. Mr. Ringwald used an overhead to diagram till
the grade change of the front and rear elevations.
MOTION: Hicks moved and Aplikowski seconded a motion to approve Planning Case I
#96-06, front and side yard variances for Herb Tousley, 3248 Sandeen Road,
based on the conditions outlined by the Planning Commission. The motion
carried unanimously (4-0). I
E. Resolution #96-07, Holiday Inn Site Plan Review, 1201 West County Road E
I
Mr. Ringwald explained that Holiday Inn is requesting approval of a modification to their Site
Plan at 1201 West County Road E to allow for the placement of an air conditioning system on I
the ground adjacent to the rear of the building. He advised the Planning Commission
unanimously recommends approval of the site plan modification wth the following conditions:
1. Provision of a 24-foot wide drive aisle adjacent to the new air conditioning system; I
2. Provision of curbing adjacent to the new air conditioning system (north and east sides), as I
shown on the applicant's plan;
3. Provision of screening material on the fence, as described in the applicant's request; I
4. Relocation of the existing plant materials to the area adjacent to the outside of the fence; -.
and
I
I. ..
" ,1'1.. ~~
I .l-.,' t<~ .~1
, iJ
-, ~
I- ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JUNE 24 1996 9
5. Provision of yellow diagonal striping, north of the curbing on the north side of the new
I air conditioning system.
. Tom Heardon, construction manager for Holiday Inn, stated he is aware of the conditions being
recommended for approval.
MOTION: Malone moved and Hicks seconded a motion to approve Planning Case #96-07,
I modification to Site Plan (Planning Case 95-6) for Holiday Inn, 1201 West
County Road E, based on the conditions outlined by the Planning Commission.
I The motion carried unanimously (4-0).
F. Resolution #96-43, Approving Cooperative Trails Grant
I Cindy Walsh, Parks & Recreation Director, announced the City has been awarded a grant in the
amount of$45,191.50 from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) to partially
I fund the trail development from Highway 96 south to Briarknoll Drive and west to North
Snelling A venue. She explained the proposed resolution is related to the discussion held several
months ago in regard to the 1996 trail project and would allow awarding the bid to the low
.. bidder, Thor Construction, Inc. with alternatives A and B to be added.
Ms. Walsh explained if the Council decides to accept the grant, trail construction could occur
. after the grant contract is finalized, which could be by July 8, 1996. It was noted that the grant
does specify that the entire project can be completed during a two-year time frame; however,
I funds have to be expended and construction must be completed by November I, 1997.
Councilmember Malone inquired if staff anticipates any right-of-way problems. Ms. Walsh
I advised staff has been in contact with the townhouse association and it appears there will be no
problem but there will need to be some cooperation in realigning their irrigation system which is
less cost restrictive than to bridge that segment on the existing easement.
I Mayor Probst inquired regarding the possibility of considering a change order on this year's
contract to include the remaining segment in an attempt to obtain a better bid. Ms. Walsh stated
I she could ask Thor Construction for an estimate on the remaining segment. Mayor Probst noted
there may be a price advantage to adding it and suggested staff investigate that option. He noted
ifthe cost for the remaining. segment is too high, it can be turned down.
I Ms. Walsh advised that work cannot resume until the grant is finalized and the contract is signed
I by the City, which she estimated would be mid-July. She informed that Thor Construction has
been very cooperative and indicated they will allow their prices to mid-July. Mayor Probst
suggested the discussion to add the remaining segment occur prior to signing the contract.
~
I
---- --------------- -----------------
... -I
.,,.-:\
:~.~~
Ql'-^ I
Q~
. 'Ii'"
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JUNE 24. 1996 10 -I
Mayor Probst noted it is the consensus of the Council to direct staff to pursue that option for
consideration at the July 8, 1996 Council meeting. I
MOTION: Hicks moved and Aplikowski seconded a motion to adopt Resolution #96-43,
Accepting the Grant from the Minnesota DNR Cooperative Trails Grant Program. I
The motion carried unanimously (4-0).
G. RFQ for Architectural Services I
Mr. Fritsinger recommended the Council direct staff to proceed with the preparation of an RFQ I
for architectural services for a new City Hall. He noted this topic has been an on-going
discussion item for several years and recently discussed at a worksession.
Mayor Probst encouraged restrictions on the length of what is submitted by interested parties. I
MOTION: Malone moved and Aplikowski seconded a motion to direct staff to proceed with I
the preparation and solicitation of an RFQ for architectural services for design of
a new City Hall.
Councilmember Aplikowski inquired regarding the status of the previous plans. Mr. Fritsinger ..
advised they will be used as a starting point and be the basis for preparation of the RFQ.
The motion carried unanimously (4-0). I
H. Resolution #96-45 Authorizing Condemnation of Street, Utility and Drainage I
Easements in Connection with Oak Avenue Reconstruction
Mr. Filla, City Attorney, eXplained that in order to reconstruct Oak A venue, it may be necessary I
to acquire easements over property owned by Marjorie Ashbach and Richard and Janet Shepley.
He further explained that he is working with the City Engineer to negotiate with these residents I
to acquire the necessary easements but, as yet, negotiations have been unsuccessful. Therefore,
he recommends the Council authorize commencement of condemnation proceedings to acquire
these needed easements over the Ashbach and Shepley properties to avoid unreasonable delay in I
the reconstruction of Oak A venue in the event negotiations remain unsuccessful.
I
I
..
I
I' .
.~,~
. " " .~
I ,. "'.""''''''r
; ,f~ '. J~"'c::r'.-'
I- ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JUNE 24. 1996 II
Mr. Filla reviewed the alignment of the existing Oak Avenue right-of-way and noted the "knob"
I which juts to the east and the roadway section which falls outside of the City's right-of-way. He
then reviewed the location of right-of-way which needs to be acquired from Ashbach and
I Shepley (approximately 15 feet). Mr. Filla reported that after the Council approved the
reconstruction of Oak A venue, the engineers met with neighbors to work out adjustments,
prepared changes to the easements, and attempted to negotiate acquisition of right-of-way but
I that effort was not successful. He reported that the attorney representing Mr. Shepley contacted
him and it now appears the alignment can be shifted slightly so only nine feet of right-of-way
needs to be acquired rather than 15 feet, which will save landscaping and existing trees. Mr.
. Filla suggested the roadway follow the old right-of-way in that area to save the existing trees.
Also, the property owner asked the City to stake the proposed and existing alignments. This was
done on Friday morning, the property owner looked at the stakes on Friday and concluded the
I roadway is four to six feet closer on the east side and four feet closer on the north side than he
expected. Mr. Filla explained it is not known whether the property owner is reading the stakes
correctly, and he is currently out of town and unable to attend the meeting tonight. Since the
I Council does not meet again until July 8th, Mr. Filla recommended they consider authorizing
condemnation proceedings to commence just in case it is needed.
.. Mr. Filla explained the change being requested by the property owner and advised that the City
Administrator and City Engineer will meet with the property owner on the site to see what can be
I worked out. Mr. Filla advised staff does not anticipate problems with the Ashbach property. It
was noted the City has been using that area of the Shepley property for many years without a
dedicated right-of-way.
I Mayor Probst stated his interest to minimize the impact and that it appears the only area of
concern is the triangular piece. He stated support to leave the property line and trees
. undisturbed, if possible.
Mr. Filla reviewed the stated objections of the property owner regarding contact with his trees
I and noted the room for movement with the alignment of the roadway. He advised it is the City's
intention to accommodate the property owner's desire to leave the trees undisturbed.
I Mayor Probst clarified the proposed resolution will authorize condemnation proceedings to
commence but it is the City's intent to negotiate a settlement without the use of condemnation, if
possible.
I Councilmember Hicks inquired regarding a possible grandfather clause which would provide the
I City with the right to continue use of this alignment without acquiring an easement. Mr. Filla
explained the City may be able to continue using that area as they have for the past 30 years, but
the City still needs to document the right-of-way. Secondly, since that area has been City
it maintained for all those years and used prior to Shepley's ownership, the City may not have to
compensate the property owner. Mr. Filla noted there is also a need for a snow storage area.
I
------
... 'I
~.~:\ I
Q \\.;p",\
1?0.. t
'\)''',c,_ ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL _ JUNE 24,1996 12 -I
Councilmember Hicks inquired regarding how close the roadway can be constructed to the right-
of-way without causing landscape or tree damage. Mr. Filla estimated nine feet. I
Councilmember Hicks stated h,e thinks the City can realign the roadway to eliminate the need to
purchase additional easements. Mr. Filla reiterated there is a need for snow storage. I
Mayor Probst stated the City is committed to relocating the roadway to correct the alignment but
he does not want to delay construction of the project. He stated he understands construction is I
currently being held up and asked if the project can proceed if the City has a prescriptive
easement. Mr. Filla explained since it is a prescriptive easement, it would prevent anyone from
claiming trespass but all activity would have to remain within the improved road surface area I
(equipment, etc.).
Mayor Probst supported remaining within the existing right-of-way until the north/south section I
of roadway at Ashbach's property and, if possible, not change the right-of-way. Councilmember
Hicks agreed that would be preferable even if the roadway is not aligned in the center of the
right-of-way. I
Mr. Filla advised that as a result of this process, it has been discovered that the garage portion is
about 17 feet from the right-of-way and about 30 feet from the improved road surface, which ..
does not meet current setback requirement. Therefore, the owner is requesting approval of a
variance to legitimize the location of the garage. Mr. Filla stated he would make that
recommendation to the Council since the need for this particular variance occurred as a result of I
either a Code amendment or misalignment of the roadway.
Mayor Probst inquired how this property could be successfully sold without a title problem I
appearing. Mr. Filla explained this easement situation may not result in an impact to the
salability of the property. I
Mr. Fritsinger noted the property stakes which the property owner was concerned with. Mr. Filla
suggested that if there is only a two foot concern, that the right-of-way be reduced by two feet. I
Council concurred.
MOTION: Malone moved and Hicks seconded to adopt Resolution #96-45 Authorizing I
Condemnation of Street, Utility, and Drainage Easements in Connection with Oak
A venue Reconstruction.
The motion carried unanimously (4-0). I
I
..
.
I' .
I""
I (H.' ,~~
-., .~:
;;
.
~ ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNC;IL - JUNE 24. 1996 13
ADMINISTRATOR COMMENTS
I Mr. Fritsinger informed the CO,uncil that a meeting has been scheduled on June 27, 1996,
I regarding the proposed quad ice arena in Blaine. He requested the Council's input and comments
regarding this proposal prior to that meeting date. Mayor Probst suggested the area of the
proforma needs to be more exact and fine-tuned.
I Councilmember Malone commented on the large downpayment and upfront cash contributions
being expected and explained that because of the per ice sheet and operating costs, there are
I insufficient funds to cover the debt service.
Mr. Fritsinger explained the down payment was not discussed because it is anticipated there will
I be a subagreement with local hockey associations to contribute those funds. Councilmember
Malone stated he does not support the quad arena proposal at this time.
I COUNCIL COMMENTS
.. Councilmember Malone updated the Council regarding AMM's position statement on
development beyond the MUSA line.
I Mayor Probst commented on a Fence Ordinance difficulty which needs to be resolved regarding
the 30% opening for air flow issue. He stated this issue warrants some discussion regarding the
intended purpose and how it can be measured.
I Mayor Probst announced he is not able to attend the Land 0' Lakes 75th Anniversary
Celebration on July 11, 1996, but Councilmember Aplikowski has agreed to attend and will
I speak on the City's behalf.
Mayor Probst advised that Congressmen Vento is holding several town meetings and TCAAP
I may be discussed.
Mayor Probst reported he received information from the Minnesota Department of Health
I regarding Special Well Construction areas which encompasses a portion of Arden Hills.
I Mayor Probst announced that AMM has scheduled a breakfast meeting on July 10, 1996. He
stated he is unable to attend and encouraged anyone else who is interested to attend.
I
,.
I
------
, '.
~<
f~ ~; ~-"" ,..:
<.~. I
(.c.,
, ..
,
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JUNE 24. 1996 14
ADJOURN I
MOTION: Malone moved and Aplikowski seconded a motion to adjourn the meeting at
9:07 p.m. The motion carried unanimously (4-0). I
I
Dennis Probst Brian Fritsinger
Mayor City Administrator I
NOTICE OF MEETINGS
The next regular City Council meeting will be held July 8, 1996, at 7:30 p.m. at New Brighton I
City Hall.
I
..
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
..
.
I ~
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS PAGEIOF3
I ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CLAIMS REPORT
TO BE APPROVED AT THE 07/08/96 COUNCIL MEETING
I-
I CLAIMS PAID SINCE LAST COUNCIL MEETING (06124/96)
I I CKi# ICKillAtlllVENUOR 'IAMOON'tI: :t:()1IlMllN1'S I
I I
1053<1 06f20196 Insty. Prints 65.23 Three Part Purchase Orders (200)
10535 06f20196 Posta"e bv Phone Svstem 400.00 Office Posta"e --
I 10536 06120196 Kinko's 55.38 Utilitv Notices Printed
10537 06120196 Diamond-T Ranch 195.00 Summer Plav"ound Trip 06/20/96
10538 06124/96 Medica 2,770.67 Health & Dental Insurance Julv
10539 06125196 Home Depot 136.90 Timhers for Retainin" Wall - Perrv Park
I 10540 06/25196 Fellin" Trailers 2,727.80 Park Trailer Fellin. 8XI2
10541 06/28/96 Public Emplovees Retirement Association 2.177.55 Second June Pavroll
10542 06/28/96 ICMA Retirement Trust 457 1,477.92 Second June Pavroll
10543 06/28/96 State Capitol Credit Union 2,589.78 Second June Pavroll
I 10544 06/28/96 Int1 Union of Operating En"ineers 175.00 June Pavrolls
10545 06/28/96 Puhlic Emplovees Retirement Assn. IIns.) 48.00 June Pavrolls Julv Insurance
to546 06/28/96 United Wav of the St. Paul Area 26.00 June Pavrolls
I to547 06127196 E- Z Recvclin~, inc. 4.714.00 June Service
10548 06/28196 Wild Mountain 174.00 Summer Plawound Trin 06128/96
10549 06/28196 Saints North 90.00 Summer Plav"ound Trin - 06128/96
10550 07/01/96 Met Council Environmental Services 47,023.00 Sewer Char"e Julv
I 10551 07/03/96 Midwest Asnhalt Comoration 204.66 Road Materials WlDiscount
I Su btotat Paid Claims 65,050.8911
I
I Paid Claims From Above - 65.050.89
Add Unpaid Claims, Page 3 of 3 64,195.32
I Total Accounts Payable Claims
for Council Approval, 07/08 129246.21
I
I
I Note: Checks for unpaid claims totaling $141,443.33, were issued
on June 25, 1996 after approval at the June 24th, 1996
Council Meeting. They were check numhers 10464-10533.
I This sequence corresponds to unpaid temporary numbers
Tl-TIO. Check numbers 10462-10463 were used for
alignment.
I. CLAIM<>
I
I #
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS PAGE20F3
I ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CLAIMS REPORT
TO BE APPROVED AT 07/08/96 COUNCIL MEETING
I-
UNPAID CLAIMS REGISTER:
I IWmI'/!.I...pg;...UAW...I..'\lENOOR. 1 AMQtJiol1' I 'ool'.lllomNTs'" )1
I 1
I TOOl 07/09/96 A & M Roto-Tillin.. Inc. 167.73 Rototillin. of City Gardens
T002 07/09/96 Accurate Press, Inc. 103.78 Business Cards Petersen
T003 07/09/96 Akana Corporation 146.60 Ballfield Chalk
T004 07/09/96 American Excelsior Comoanv 76.61 Maintenance Sunnlies Storm Sewers
I T005 07/09/96 Denise Anderson 23.00 Refund - Tennis
T006 07/09/96 Animal Control Services, Inc. 148.75 Do. / Cat Enforcement. 06fi)7 06/20
T007 07/09/96 AT&T Wireless Services (Phoenix) 58.65 Current Invoices
T008 07/09/96 Frederick Bell 100.00 Uniform Cleanin. Allowance for 1996
I TOlO 07/09/96 Bifrs, Inc. 391.28 Portable Toilets Eioht Parks. June
TOll 07/rE/96 LuAnn Brunn 200.00 City Hall Janitorial Services, 06/15-07/15
T012 07/rE/96 Clutch & Transmission Service 246.13 #8 Lift - Drive Shaft
T013 07/rE/96 Connelly Industrial Electronic 131.89 Service North Water Tower
I T014 07/rE/96 Davies Water Eouinment Comnanv 642.39 Water Maintenance Materials
T015 07/rE/96 Department of Militarv Affairs 720.10 Sewer I Water Connection Final Pavrnent
T016 07/09/96 Christopher Diemer 89.59 Reimbursement - June MileaQ:e
I T017 07/09/96 Earl F. Andersen. Inc. 37.77 Street Sims Fairview
T018 07/09/96 Focus News 166.20 Various LeQ'al Notices
T019 07/09/96 Brian FritsIDQ'er 109.34 Reimburse - EDAM Coof., TCAAP Mtos.
T020 07/09/96 W.W. Grain.er, Inc. 11.29 Fan City Hall Furnace
I T021 07/rE/96 Mary Hoyme 5.00 Refund - Plav.roupd Svecial Event
T022 07/09/96 Hvdro Suvplv Company 1,562.10 Water Meters and Meter Parts
T023 07/09/96 Ruth Johnson 20.00 Refund - Summer Plav.round Triv
T024 07/09/96 Kath Auto Suvvlv 40.74 Various SUDDlies
I T025 07/09/96 Jeffrey Keesling 80.81 Uniform Cleaning Allowance for 1996
IMinus Clothin. Purchase Exceedin. limit)
T026 07/09/96 LTG Power Eauipment 54.58 Vehicle #33 Repair Parts
I T027 07/09/96 Jane Lund 11.66 Reimbursement - Mileag:e
T028 07/rE/96 Chervl Ma<muson 32.00 Refund - Tennis
T029 07/rE/96 Maintenance Tools & Suoolies 47.84 Unisorb Concrete Renair Comnound
T030 07/rE/96 Maple Island Group, Inc. 170.00 Network Technical Suvvort
I T031 07/rE/96 Judith Maxwell 20.00 Refund - Summer PlaV2round Trin
T032 07/rE/96 MCFOA (Mun. Clerks & Fin. Officers) 25.00 Annual Membershin - Fritsing:er
T033 07/rE/96 Michael McKinnev 100.00 Uniform Cleanin. Allowance for 1996
T034 07/rE/96 Menards 134.10 Flat White Paint Parks
I T035 07/rE/96 MetroDolitan Insnection Service~ Inc. 1,412.00 Electrical InsDections - June
T036 07/rE/96 Mever Enterorises 55.38 Vehicle #2 Starter
T037 07/rE/96 An2ela Miller 5.00 Refund - Plawround Soecial Event
T038 07/09/96 MN City / County Mana.ement Assn. 60.00 Annual Membershiv - Fritsin.er
I T039 07/09/96 Joseph Moonev 100.00 Uniform Cleanino Allowance for 1996
T040 07/09/96 National Alliance for Youth Sports (NYSCA \ 210.00 Certification. Softball and T - Ball
T041 07/09/96 New Bril!hton Parks & Recreation 90.00 Adavtive Recreation Pro.ram 13 Peonle\
I T042 07/09/96 N orthem H vdr aulics 111.42 Cover for Sand / Salt Pile and Cleaner
T043 07/09/96 Northern States Power Company 3291.46 CUrrent Invoices
T044 07/rE/96 J ames Perron 100.00 Uniform Cleanin2 Allowance for 1996
T045 07/09/96 Tracy Petersen 76.57 Reimbursement - June Mileal:!e
I T046 07/09/96 Proex Photo 17.47 Film / Develonin. Parks
I Total, Pa2e 2 of 3 Carried Forward 11.404.231
Ie e""","
I
I
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS PAGE30F3
I . ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CLAIMS REPORT
TO BE APPROVED AT 07/08/96 COUNCIL MEETING
.-
I UNPAID CLAIMS REGISTER (CONT.):
IjRMP'#..I.CIl:'DA'illI'..,wJilJ>OR IAMotrl!l1.' lcoM:Mi!iortif.' . >1
I I
I T047 07/rY'J/96 Ramsey County 1,181.02 Diesel & Unleaded Fuel - Purchased in May
47,043.00 Law Enforcement - July
T048 07/rY'J/96 Fred Reed 100.00 Uniform Cleaning Allowance for 1996
T049 07/rY'J/96 Kevin Ringwald 49.59 Reimbursement Mileage (EDAM Conf.)
I T050 07/rY'J/96 Stenhen Saxe 100.00 Uniform Cleaning Allowance for 1996
T051 07/rY'J/96 Scherer Bros. Lumber Comoanv 29.66 Lumber Perry Park Concrete Forms
T052 07/rY'J/96 Michael Schifsky 100.00 Uniform Cleaning Allowance for 1996
T053 07/rY'J/96 City of Shoreview 2,612.22 Snring Clean Un Dav
I T054 07/rY'J/96 St. Paul Book & Stationery 164.78 Various Office Supplies
T055 07/rY'J/96 Tracv Steener 32.00 Refund - Tennis
T056 07/rY'J/96 Target Stores 49.47 Summer Playground Supplies
I T057 07/rY'J/96 Timesaver Off Site Secretarial 315.25 Council Meetings - 06/10 and 06/24
T058 07/f'f}/96 Toltz, Kin1!, Duvall, Anderson & Assoc. 76.55 Ene:ineerin g Services Chatham Circle
T059 07/rY'J/96 Top Temporary 205.50 Week Ending 06/16, Bellmore
205.50 Week Ending - 06123, Zick
I T060 07/rY'J/96 Triarco Arts & Supolies 19.21 Art and Craft Supplies
T061 07/rY'J/96 U.S. Tennis Association (USTA) 273.00 Membershin Fees for 1996
T062 07/rY'J/96 Cvnthia Walsh 69.78 Reimbursement June Mileage
T063 07/f'f}/96 West Weld 59.56 Miscellaneous Supplies
I T064 07/rY'J/96 David Winkel 100.00 Uniform Cleaning Allowance for 1996
T065 07/rY'J/96 Kathleen Zimmerman 5.00 Refund Plawround Snecial Event
I Subtotal, Page 3 of 3 52.791.09
Page 2 of 3 Brought Forward - -- 11.404.23
I Total Unpaid Claims --- 64,195.321
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I E:1:!1:!r::~ I:! I:! I:! 8 q I:! I:! I:! I:! I:!
_ ~ loog~ 00001 ~ 00000 I
I CC III ""~
- >,.,' ~ ~ .
Q. iii ~ '" '"
.... > 8 '<I
I I) .c .< ~
.". 1 ~ ~
~ ~ ~ 17l ~ ~ ~ :~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8; a ~ q ~ ~::g 8; ~ ~ R 0 'e ~
~~~$~ s::....a::~ ~ ~&o~f!i~ ..00.......8,:'< t:;i\O~~ '~'1ii~
~QO.N."""~"<t .....:If! o. "'l. ~~:;1:(:::~,:~ ~(")3.~"<t "'&.!
,^ jI!I; {'l .... .... . '.... N ..... vS 06 ~ :_," 00 00.... ~ .1l <<l
__ ;( ........N /"'" N N <<I~
I 0).' "~ iP ~
CXl~ ~~~
'" 0 "
C\I .,", ",'. ~
~ _ ~ 6 .~
co.., . " ' ,.. 0 " ,;:
O .,0"" .0 ~. Iii ~ ~ .
.!;l e . " ~"' .... iil .
IC:O 5 .c "a) , .S .0 ~ <"&::a ~ .s
:,' "GJ ~, $:l = e ... 0: 'V'l ~ <Ii
~ ,~i t.~ e I :.~ 8 .g 6 ~ ~ ~: 0: ~ ~
'< .~, "o>~u~ :.o::J:; ~ I /OS O~r.:l\ !1I).i:'
A . i .. -. '" -.'" ~-s-
o ',~ ~ u ..... ..... '.. .....:::1 00 ~.-. ..... \0 II,) V,l G
, 5 ea~ ~~ ~ ; _l~ =~.l@5 1.~1
I ~I 1'g~~lg~8~~ io~~:ll ~3~~'g ]t~
o :~, 0::;: e~~;~ 8""'=::-0 ~~~-;~, ~~~o::s If'a]
W :l:l;ij -< <: j:l.; ~ ~.iCe .( <( 00 IJJ :::: ....... ~ - ~ : u ~ ~ ['""" Q., .(.( ..
I ..,...""',.,"'.'.",, i-o i-o u u <( <( <(~ ~::;; ... 0 = ~ .0 ~ - 0 ; .S. 0 ~ - u u ~
..... (IIIlj _ I-l .... _ lfJ v.J IZl '-' \.il U ;:J d ~ 0 II,) ..... _" i- ~ OJ .... _ 0
U .'i=[1]'" '" '" '" []]]'" '" '" ,. [ill]~: ~ : - : : i-o z " '" '". " .J Z '" '" ~
.,...,<",."..,.,101,.,..,. . . . ~H\ iB:g:g iB
I <.0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I I ill '
(.( ..... .. "0 "0 "l:I lJ -'l ~ lJ -d
. ::lii ~. ~ ~ ~ ] ~ III ~ ~ ~ ) ~ ~ l
I 0 .~ ~ 8 I I I 'n;;;;;;;;;]!<!<'n'.q;;;.~
g: .~ ~ i'~ i i ~ ~ I ! I i ~ i ~ H ~ I H
~ ~ a ~ ~ ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I W <l I:! <l
~ M ~
~ 888 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ 8 8 ~ ~ ~
-, g g 0 g ~ g g g g g g g g g g g g ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~
I ~ :;g88~~~::::~~l;O;g!D~~~gN~13~~~~~:a8S~~0\~~~~:~
o ~dd~"":;06~C"'i::t~r-:~r-.:..tdr-:lri2N~211'i~..t{'f'jo\~r...:o\:3o.::.g,..o...:i:q
t) ~ r-~t!tl~\boo:cl~~s::;~r::~8"ir;N~ ~~&:;"'<t~~::~ :::~.g
W ~ I ~ ~ :~
I Q) .~
. .
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ R ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ q ~ ~ ~ ::
"'".. 0 "'<t 0 ~ ~ 0\ N ~ 0\ ~ 0\ 0 ~ 00 ~ 0\ ~ ~ 0\ 00 ~ 0\ 00 r- 0\ r- ~ ~ r- N ~ g ~:a k,,~,
:0 ~~~ oooo~;:;f~:;f~~~~~~&:i;?'lOO~:clN:2\Or::j~!;;.;;:~!;;;!:C<1"""""":~
I .~ N~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~:;
# .~
~ d
- .,~, . =
I w ~ - . -
....J ::" c: 4) -= ~ (I) c:
...J Z = c: ..... c: .2 ~ "ii (I) >- c. t >- ~ d~ ~ 11} ~
","' <'is ._> (1) .~ = c.l <d.g, E II) C':l .8 c: .z: S _ 0 '" = a 5 ~;:l ~
"'T'" ~ 0..... ......o-::j"'cu ..... -= "'....~...:.l"'OJ:l._"'(I).....e-....c.........uoo ....
..a... ;... \0 1-0 (I) .!:: ;::I ~ (J I\} "'=' U co u.... ::::'r-< '- .c ._ l-o ~ ;:: ...... >. .~ -: (OJ <iii....
... ~ 1%1 ~ -= l-, ll) -= = ~ .- '" e (I) ~ I-< .. 4) ... l-< ro u <'ll .c <d 0 I-< <d ... 0'" ~...
Z ~ ~ Vl ~:::?J <d !Ll .- _~ "'l::I ~ 0 ~ Q ll) <d .... El -= ~ ::c E-< CI) v .c l:Q .: .c U ~ "" .- '"
I 6 I li)-Oa5~:: ~o U'e ~':.,~ ~ ~~o cBuU... ~=~~ I';:! ~CQU ~c:~o~~
W So." ~ /Jll<<i 0 ~ ~~.....u c=~Q~=~V:l"E ""'_ c ~"'~O...:.d o.~ >,Z gf- =2 1J.s;:g 6
O ... co c 1t '" ... u.... ~ ~ ~ <tl C 0 ~ Il) :.:: .d II) 0 Il) '" e Il) ..= .... ... '" ... ~ C
f'l ';;j &lI c II) ~ "t:I i !:2 "C..... 0 Il)~..... ...:.d '" '" E "'" .n c ;:.:a C':S C':S .c ..= :J Il) Il) =
a: .,:g ,<;:: .= g ~ ~ 0;3 u ~ :.a 8 t:: ~ ";i ~ -= 8 -; .2 0 ~ ~ a :; ell -a [S. e g t :; <<i is
< ,~? ~ ~ ~ i-o ~ '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ::;; ~ '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ == ~ 0 0 U " '" ~ ~ i-o
II ~ ~'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ lioIlol ~ M I ~ :1;~ ~ ~ 0 ~ M ~ ~ ~ ~ t:: ~ ~ .. ~ M '" ;t :l! ~ !O ~ ~ i> ~ S! III
I uipi!; i!:i i!:i I i!:i:li~ ~ IUd! iid!!ii !H: ~ddi :di IH:Ii:li ~ :odli ~ :di:li:li
I
I CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
,. MEMORANDUM
DATE: July 8, 1996
I TO: Mayor and City Council
I FROM: Kevin Ringwald, Community Development Director ~
I SUBJECT: Planning Case 96-05, PUD Master PlanlMinor Subdivision
Control Data Corporation, 4201 Lexington Avenue
I Request
The applicant is requesting approval of a PUD Master Plan and a Preliminary Minor Subdivision.
The Preliminary Minor Subdivision application is to facilitate the potential sale of the building
I and property adjacent to 4290 Lexington Avenue (original DynaMark building).
Background
I The Planning Commission reviewed the applicants request on June 5, 1996. The Planning
Commission tabled consideration of the applicants request to allow for the resolution of two
Ie outstanding items. Those two items were signage and park dedication. The Planning
Commission reviewed the request again on July 2, 1996 and recommended approval subject to
conditions outlined in the Staff memorandum dated July 2, 1996. The minutes of that portion of
I the July 2, 1996 Planning Commission meeting are attached to this memorandum (Exhibit A).
Planninl! Commission Recommendation
I The Planning Commission recommends approval of Planning Case 96-05, PUD Master Plan,
subject to the following conditions:
I I. Land Uses allowed by this PUD shall those land uses described in the applicants land use
chart (Exhibit A, page 3 of 21). Except, that the percentage to which the existing land
uses currently exist on the site shall be adhered to or provisions are made for additional
I parking;
2. Lot Coverage shall be a maximum of 30 percent and Parcels A-I and C may be viewed
jointly in determining the lot coverage;
I 3. Floor Area Ratio shall be a maximum of 0.6 and Parcels A-I and C may be viewed
jointly in determining the floor area ratio;
4. Landscape Lot Area shall be 25 percent for Parcels A -I and C and J 5 percent for Parcel
I A-2. Also, the three Key Landscape Elements as described by Exhibit A, page 21 of21,
shall be protected from disturbance;
I
..
I
I
5. Parking for Parcels A-I and C shall be determined to have a current surplus of 171 I
parking spaces and Parcel A-2 shall be determined to have a current surplus of 41 parking
spaces. Also, the row of parking stalls adjacent to Fernwood Avenue shall be eliminated --
and replaced with landscaping prior to any further site plan approvals are granted on
Parcels A-lor C. The landscaping is to be reviewed by the Planning Commission and
consideration for approval by the City Council. The landscaping shall receive approval I
by the City;
6. Park dedication for land shall be granted and/or fees in lieu of dedication shall be
determined by the City Council after consideration and recommendation by the Parks and I
Recreation Committee;
7. Signage along Lexington A venue shall be limited to the current level of signage, all other
signage shall be governed by the requirements of the Sign Code; I
8. Architectural Design shall be consistent with the applicants description on Exhibit A,
page 5 of21 and the requirements of the City Code, whichever is greater;
9. Skyway from the CDC campus (southwest part) and the CPI campus is acceptable, I
subject to City review and approval of the construction, aesthetics, and distribution of
liabilities of the skyway;
10. Utilities shall be governed by the rules and regulations applicable at the time of review; I
11. The East-West private street between Parcels A-I and B should not be dedicated as a
public street (collector); and I
12. Parcel B shall be analyzed by itself in relationship to the land development parameters
and that those parameters shall not be flexed from what the City Code allows.;
The Planning Commission recommends approval of Planning Case 96-05, preliminary minor ..
subdivision, subject to the following conditions:
I. Provision of the necessary drainage and utility easements, prior to Planning Commission I
consideration of the final minor subdivision;
2. Provision of the necessary vehicular cross access easements, prior to Planning I
Commission consideration of the final minor subdivision; and
3. Dedication and/or payment of the appropriate park dedication for Parcels A-2 and B, as
determined by the City Council. I
Deadline for Agency Actions
The City of Arden Hills received the complete application for this request on May 2,1996. I
Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute the City must act on this request by Monday, July I, 1996
(60 days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60 day I
review period. The City provided written notice to the applicant on June 10, 1996 stating that the
review period would be extended an additional 60 days. The additional review period would
extend to Friday, August 30, 1996. The City may with the petitioners consent extend the review I
period beyond the Friday, August 30, 1996 date. Lastly, if the City denies the petitioners
request, "... it must state in writing the reasons for the denial at the time that it denies the
request. " I
--
I
------.--
I'
I Notes
,. 1. Pursuant to Section V, L, 5, d, of the Zoning Ordinance a four/fifths (4/5's) majority of
the full City Council is required to approve a PUD Master Plan.
2. Pursuant to Section VIII, E, 4, ofthe Zoning Ordinance no application which has been
denied wholly or in part shall be resubmitted for a period of six (6) months from the date
I of the denial.
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,.
.
I f)(ij1~" A '/,
I MINUTE~
I- CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, ~1!}
PLANNING COMMISSIO
TUESDAY, JULY 2, 1996
I 7:30 P.M. - NEW BRIGHTON CITY HALL
I CALL TO ORDER
I Acting Chair Nelson called the meeting to order at 7:31 p.m.
ROLL CALL
I Present were Acting Chair Nelson, Commissioners David Carlson, Gregg Larson, and
Dave Sand.
I Also present were: Councilmember Malone, Community Development Director Kevin
Ringwald, and Recording Secretary Lorri Kopischke.
I Absent were Chair Steve Erickson, Commissioners Barbara Piotrowski and Marty Rye.
.. APPROVE MINUTES
Sand moved, seconded by Carlson, to approve the June 5, 1996, minutes. The motion
I carried unanimously (4-0).
CASE #96-05 PUBLIC HEARING CONTROL DATA AND CSM. 4201 LEXINGTON
I AVENUE. PUD & MINOR SUBDIVISION
I Acting Chair Nelson gave an overview of the public hearing process, then opened the public
hearing at 7:32 p.m.
. Acting Chair Nelson requested verification of the public hearing notice. Community
Development Director, Kevin Ringwald verified notice of the public hearing in the Focus on
June 20 and June 27, 1996.
I Mr. Ringwald reported that the applicant is requesting approval of a PUD Master Plan and a
Preliminary Minor Subdivision. The Planning Commission discussed this request in great length
I at the June 5, 1996 Planning Commission meeting. At the conclusion of that meeting, the two
items remaining to be resolved were signage and park dedication. The Control Data Corporation
sign (off-premise), which is located on the CSM property, was resolved on June 18, 1996 when
I CSM provided the City with their application to join the PUD Master Plan. The park dedication
issue was brought before the Park and Recreation Committee on June 25, 1996 and discussed at
~ great length. The Park and Recreation Committee's recommendations were as follows:
I
2/) ()~ I
'i"" A
~~,If>" .1
l"l:u
a. Provide the City with a permanent parking lease/easement. We would need a out 50-60
parking stalls from 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.
b. The lease would be free to the City indefinitely. The City would not be responsible for I
snow plowing, ground maintenance, electricity or future reconstruction as long as there is
an occupant in the building that currently houses DynaMark. Any additional light I
fixtures or necessary ADA adaptions would be at the City's expense.
c. The lease would be perpetual and renewable at the City's option. The length oftime will
need to be determined by staff and the City Attorney. I
d. CDC wants to retain the ability to move the designated parking stalls to another area as
necessary if additional buildings are added to the site.
e. CDC will provide the City and easement to access the parking lot. The parking area does I
require access through private streets in order to get Fernwood A venue or Lexington
Avenue.
f. CDC will also give the City a 100 foot strip of property west of the parking lot and east of I
our existing trail. The City currently has a 70 foot pedestrian and bike easement over part
of this. Accepting this property would give the City fee title and allow us to develop this
area, if we should ever want to. I
Mr. Ringwald stated that it is his understanding that the petitioner is in agreement with these I
conditions.
Mr. Ringwald stated that approvals given on Parcel B in Planning Case 95-09 and 11 essentially ..
fully develop the parcel. Due to this, Stafffeels that Parcel B should be analyzed by itself in
relationship to the land development parameters and that those parameters not be flexed to
accommodate future growth beyond what the City Code currently allows. I
Mr. Ringwald noted the applicant has asked for clarification of "Key Landscape Elements".
Area I is an approximately 200 foot wide wooded buffer between Parcel A-2 and the residential .
neighborhood to the west. The applicants request would limit the wooded area to the 100 feet
that the Park and Recreation Committee is recommending to be accepted as park. This would
provide some buffer but would require the City to be responsible for the buffer. Staff concludes I
that the applicant should be responsible for some portion of the buffer. Also the edge ofthe
wooded area provides excellent screening currently but if the outside edge of vegetation was to
be removed, it would expose the more open middle portion of the woodlot and its effectiveness I
as a screen would be diminished. Without a specific development proposal, Staff cannot support
the requested modification to the designation of the woodlot. If a development proposal is I
submitted in the future, Staff could envision a minor infringement into the woodlot of (less than
25 feet) but not a major infringement (greater than 50 feet). Area 2 is heavily wooded with a
steep ravine leading to Karth Lake. The applicant has requested that the "Key Landscape Area" I
start 30 feet east of their current building. Staff is supportive of this distance. The applicant has
also requested that the portion of Area 2 adjacent to Lexington A venue eliminated. Staff is
concerned with elimination of this area due to its small size and its poor vehicular access to I
Lexington Avenue.
-.
I
I Ys-
I f1")
~0;9":~"".. .~~
f' Mr. Ringwald stated that Staff recommends approval of Planning Case ~6~03~jI?,~aster Plan,
subject to the following conditions:'.
I. Land Uses allowed by this PUD shall be those land uses described in the applicant land
I use chart (Exhibit A, page 3 of21). Except, that the percentage to which the existing land
uses currently exist in the site shall be adhered to or provisions are made for additional
parking.
I 2. Lot Coverage shall be a maximum 000 percent and Parcels A-I and C may be viewed
jointly in determining the lot coverage;
3. Floor Area Ratio shall be a maximum of 0.6 and Parcels A-I and C may be viewed
I jointly in determining the floor area ratio;
4. Landscape Lot Area shall be 25 percent for Parcels A-I and C and 35 percent for Parcel
I A-2. Also, the three Key Landscape Elements as described by Exhibit A, page 21 of21,
shall be protected from disturbance;
5. Parking for Parcels A-I and C shall be determined to have a current surplus of 171
I parking spaces and Parcel A-2 shall be determined to have a current surplus of 41 parking
spaces. Also, the row of parking stalls adjacent to Fernwood Avenue shall be eliminated
and replaced with landscaping. The landscaping is to be reviewed by the Planning
I Commission and consideration for approval by the City Council. The landscaping shall
receive approval by the City, prior to any further site plan approvals are granted on
Parcels A-lor C;
Ie 6. Park dedication for land shall be granted and/or fees in lieu of dedication shall be
determined by the City Council after consideration and recommendation by the Parks and
Recreation Committee;
I 7. Signage along Lexington A venue shall be limited to the current level of signage, all other
signage shall be governed by the requirements of the Sign Code;
8. Architectural Design shall be consistent with the applicants description on Exhibit A,
I page 5 of 21 and the requirements of the City Code, whichever is greater;
9. Skyway from the CDC campus (southwest part) and the cpr campus is acceptable,
I subject to City review and approval of the construction, aesthetics, and distribution of
liabilities of the skyway;
10. Utilities shall be governed by the rules and regulations applicable at the time of review;
I II. The East-West private street between Parcels A-I and B should not be dedicated as a
public street (collector); and
12. Parcel B shall be analyzed by itself in relationship to the land development parameters
I and that those parameters shall not be flexed from what the City Code allows.;
Mr. Ringwald stated Staff recommends approval of Planning Case 96-05, preliminary minor
I subdivision, subject to the following conditions:
1. Provision of the necessary drainage and utility easements, prior to Planning Commission
I consideration of the final minor subdivision;
2. Provision of the necessary vehicular cross access easements, prior to Planning
t- Commission consideration of the final minor subdivision; and
I
'1/ s- I
h~ I
..'~.._/. '0.. .:-..
3. Dedica:ion and/or payment of.the appropriate park dedication for Parcels A-2 ~~R:~'~
determmed by the City Council. )j .y.., ~ --
'1
Mr. Ringwald noted if the Planning Commission makes a recommendation on this Planing Case,
then it would be heard at the Monday, July 8, 1996, regular meeting ofthe City Council. .
Acting Chair Nelson asked for comments in support of the proposal.
Jeff Smyser, RLK Associates, Ltd., representing Control Data Corporation stated that Control I
Data was in full agreement with all the conditions except for two. He requested Condition 5 be
reworded by inserting "prior to any further site plan approvals are granted on Parcels A-I and C" .
after "...Fernwood Avenue shall be eliminated and replaced with landscaping". He also
requested that rather than require 200 feet of buffer area, the buffer area be located on the
easterly 125 feet of the wooded area. He felt 200 feet would place a constraint on development I
of the site.
Bill Franke, 1228 Wynridge Drive, stated he generally supported the proposal but was concerned .
with the preservation of the wooded area. He noted there was currently a city trail to the west of
the woods that led to tennis courts. If the wooded area is reduced to 100 feet, then it will
essentially eliminate all the woods that run along the south area of the tennis court. He felt it did I
not make sense to remove existing trees that are a natural buffer and amenity.
Acting Chair Nelson asked if there were any comments against the proposal. No one came eI
forward to address the Commission.
Hearing no further comments, Acting Chair Nelson closed the public hearing at 7:57 p.m. .
Commissioner Carlson asked Mr. Ringwald ifhe approved of Mr. Smyser's suggested I
modifications.
Mr. Ringwald stated he was in agreement with the modification to Condition 5. He stated he did I
not agree with the modification to the amount of buffer area required between Parcel A-2 and the
adjacent residential. He stated that the Staff s recommendation would provide for sufficient
flexibility to a place a bay of parking with minimal intrusion into the wooded area. The Park and I
Recreation Committee has also suggested to maximize the wooded area to the extent possible to
enhance the park and buffering to the adjacent single family homes. He noted it is not I
uncharacteristic to require large buffers between incompatible uses, such as industrial and single
family.
Commissioner Carlson verified that there was flexibility in the amount of infringement into the I
wooded lot.
Mr. Ringwald stated if a future buyer could justify the need for a modification, the issue could I
again be brought before the Planning Commission and considered. --
I
I -S-( s-
I tJ,,"',
o;;,...~l,i/<"
" Commission Larson asked what constituted the PUD documents, if the applid~tO(fp<)rt was
included in the PUD Documents and a delineation of the Key Landscape Elemenfl!w'arcluded.
Mr. Ringwald explained the PUD document is a very specific document which incorporates all
I of the conditions, maps, and charts. The elements of the applicant's which were approved would
be included in the document and a blow up of each Key Landscape Element which illustrates
specifically what is being required and approved is included.
I Commissioner Larson noted Staff had previously recommended that payment of the appropriate
park dedication fee be required rather than dedication of land.
I Mr. Ringwald explained this had been revised due to the recommendation of the Park and
I Recreation Committee and the Director of Parks and Recreation. The City currently has a 70
foot easement on the property west of the parking lot and east of the existing trail. Control Data
is requesting and the Park and Recreation Committee is concurring that Control Data dedicated
I to the City that property and also and additional 30 foot strip adjacent to it. The City would then
own the westerly 100 feet of the approximately 200 foot wide wooded area. Control Data would
own the easterly 100 feet and would be responsible for maintaining their portion of the required
I buffer.
Commissioner Larson stated he understood the need for flexibility on the site but felt that a
.. larger continuous area set aside to be preserved was more valuable than having landscaping
divided up around the site. He noted this item could be visited again in the future if there was
rationale to do so.
I Larson moved, seconded by Sand, to approve Planning Case #96-05, PUD Master Plan,
subject to the 12 conditions outlined above and amending Condition 5 by inserting
I inserting "prior to any further site plan approvals are granted on Parcels A-I and C" after
"...Femwood Avenue shall be eliminated and replaced with landscaping". The motion
I carried unanimously (4-0).
Sand moved, seconded by Carlson to approve Planning Case #96-05, preliminary minor
I subdivision, subject to the three conditions outlined above. The motion carried
unanimously (4-0).
I
I
I
--
I
I A~~A I fur GAN/~ ~tNrs F>c~"'r 6 '~
I ",,,,,,,J '1,
.. ~ I
...,..,
I "ILllIL~ .",.
"'of>"1
..",I
I .::::::
,.
.I
I 1IIIjllllllllljl'lo1llllllllIII11111111111111111111'~1 il~
111'11111"11111 JIIII',IIII""I"'flI"""!JI''''''!!llt''D )
,,"""11,,111111 riTiiiillllllil ',','II~lllllj"lllllllli I
I II) I"
lIlt 11111" """"111"1"1'1 ~lr'llll'l ,. """,, r "1"'1"0 J- ~
-----11 Ilollllll. ,""(01)"111111 lIllll'llllll' 1"Il' .
: 1_ 111I"III"'"IIII""II!111 1111I1111111!1"" 11111':1 \ { I I
J ,!llll,,,,. ..llll",,,,,llll 'i7:iillllll. """'" .",,,, U ~
I ~ """",.. ..,,,,,,,,,, """"" ""~~"""''''''''''''''''''''''''''''0 I - Q
C1
- "
:: i_ . . . . . I ..j.'- ..
I ~"".-.J IJI11(llll,lllliU UIIIIIJI;, dddllJlllllllJlllill \1l)'J~lijlllll( t ,oIll.,,;...II,U
I.' i" \\ j-.
~ _I _ _ _ _ _ _ \'_ _ I 1""""111''''7''
I'" -. - - - - - - - -'t .1
< :::1 ~ = = == == = ==!r-:= ::::~. ."."I.,ll,'i ',;,.
I I::: ~I ~ \~ ~:jl ".""""""~
- -I - - - - - - .'- J n
~i:: - - ~! ::- ----- · A
.: =1 ;:: =--=-=-=-=.-=-;:~ , .,,~ jI\
~ - - ~ ~ 1 ~ I ~~""
c ::, = = = = = = l:.i~ . .,
125 ; i = = = = = = vloQ <(
~ - ------
~ - =1 5 = ~ ~
I" ~I I ~ ~ = = = = , ~ t
- - -I _ _ ___
-I - - ~
I ~i ~ ~,n ~.u CiJ a:.
_I c _ ... -=-~
=,: I~ ~: t;:J ; - r- -- ---- - 6
- -::1 <=:: n ~. U f-
-oj _ _ - ~! I
~ -, - = = ",;L.... 'I CD
- --J - = o. " :X Z
" - - -
I _i~~ = ~ ~ U111 11"I.'lil"'~' X
- - -.-11 __ --
=l w
I ::i~ ~ <= - ..J
-= ' jj .-
I =~L= t:=~=~ J g
E - - -I ~ ~ - iJ -.
I I = 3j' ~ ~ ~ :1;1
___-0 ___ _
,___-0 ___ -
~ = = :: il;~, .;'1
I I: ~ ~I' ~= ~ ~., 1.1t =
, == == =:: ;:-= - -.......... --
~ - - - -->>--
'V- == ==:::: = = =
1 - == =:::;, = = = --
I - = ::1 I :: :::: n Q I ...
- - _, - - - ,. I.. _ _ ..... _
I I =--_-=-_2L.:=:_=-_= 1'1:',,11 ...1\111..,111,.,11,11111);11".,.,11111 - ::b
I' =-=--:'~-II' I~---I ~ ",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, """'''''''''''''''' ,,"'" "'''~
- - --V - 1"1111111 loI,I,,""i'i1'11 11111'111"1..'1111111 ~-
, ''',,'''''''''' 0 "';,,~,. - I""""""",,,,,,,,,,.,,,,,,,,,,,, '''''''''''''''''''' 0 - 0 .
C-l
I .
.,,,,. I
I
-I
I
I
I
I
I
..""t.. I
..
I
I
) I
I.{zol I
I
I
..1.,.....
I
..
I
I ... .
I .. ~
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
I- MEMORANDUM
DATE: July 8, 1996
I TO: Mayor & City Council . ~
I FROM: Cindy S. Walsh, Parks & Recreation DirectorG)
I SUBJECT: Control Data Corporation Park Dedication
Back!!:round
I As a part of Control Data Corporation's (CDC) request for approval of a PUD Master Plan and a
Preliminary Minor Subdivision, CDC is required to fulfill park dedication requirements. The
City currently has a temporary lease agreement with CDC that allows parking for Cummings
I Park users. I would like to ensure that the City has a permanent parking area for Cummings
Park, as CDC fulfills their park dedication requirements for Planning Case #96-05.
I When staff originally discussed the parking issue with CDC, they were not interested in allowing
the City to continue to park in the location that we currently use. However, in recent
.. conversations between staff and CDC, CDC agreed to give the City a permanent parking
easement in the area where Cummings Park users currently park. I think that gaining a
permanent easement to use the existing lot would be a win-win situation for both the City and
I CDC for these reasons:
1. The City would benefit from not having to clear trees to create a lot.
I 2. The City would also not have to expend additional money from the Park Fund to build
and maintain a City owned parking lot.
3. CDC would benefit from not having to pay a fee to the City.
I 4. The lot the City would create would have been located by the water tower, which is not as
close to the park as the existing CDC lot. The location of the lot we use now would
provide much better access for park users.
I Park Dedication Agreement
Control Data Corporation, City Staff, and the Parks & Recreation Committee are all in
I agreement that CDC would fulfill park dedication requirements by providing a permanent
parking easement for 50-60 parking stalls. CDC has also indicated that they would dedicate an
I additional 100 foot strip of wooded property located west of the parking lot and east of our
existing trail. The details of the lease are as follows:
I 1. Provide the City with a permanent parking lease/easement. We would need about 50-60
parking stalls from 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. every day.
f'
I
I ",'
. .'
2. There would be no cost to the City as part of the lease. The City would not be
.- responsible for snow plowing, ground maintenance, electricity or future reconstruction as
long as there is an occupant in the building that currently houses DynaMark. Any
additional light fixtures or necessary ADA adaptations would be at the City's expense.
3. The lease would be perpetual and renewable at the City's option. The length of time will
I need to be determined by staff and the City Attorney.
4. CDC wants to retain the ability to move the designated parking stalls to another area as
necessary if additional buildings are added to the site.
I 5. CDC will provide the City an easement to access the parking lot. The parking area does
require access through private streets in order to get to Femwood Avenue or Lexington
Avenue.
I 6. CDC will also give to the City a 100 foot strip of property west of the parking lot and east
of our existing trail. The City currently has a 70 foot pedestrian and bike easement over
I part of this. Accepting this property would give the City fee title and provide the City
with the option to develop this area, or preserve it as a buffer strip between the adjoining
residential district.
I Recommendation
I recommend that the City Council move to approve the park dedication agreement as outlined
I above. City Attorney, Jerry Filla, will be drafting a lease in the near future.
The Parks & Recreation Committee has recommended the same. A copy of the minutes and the
.. motion by the Parks & Recreation Committee is attached.
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
f'
I
I' 4
. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
I- MEMORANDUM
DATE: July 8, 1996
I TO: Mayor and City Council
I FROM: Kevin Ringwald, Community Development Director ~
SUBJECT: Resolution 96-46, endorsing AMM's policy on metropolitan growth
1 Request
I The City Council is requested to adopt Resolution 96-46, endorsing the Association of
Metropolitan Municipalities (AMM) policy on metropolitan growth (Exhibit A).
I Background
The Metropolitan Council estimates that the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area (TCMA) will
increase by 330,000 households and 650,000 people by the year 2020. The impact that these
I new residents will have on the metropolitan systems (transportation, wastewater treatment,
aviation, and parks) and the quality of life currently enjoyed by the residents of the TCMA is a
major concern.
.. The Metropolitan Council and the Builders Association of the Twin Cities (BATC) have
proposed alternate views on how best to accommodate this growth. The Metropolitan Council
I has three proposed alternates for regional growth. Those alternates are: the Current Trend,
Concentrated Development, and Growth Centers. The SA TC' s proposal is based on simplified
I and continued expansion of the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). The MUSA is a
boundary beyond which the Metropolitan Council will not expend money on metropolitan
systems. The MUS A is meant to regulate development so that the public's investment in the
I metropolitan systems is wisely spent. An executive summary of the Metropolitan Council and
the BA TC proposal are attached to this memorandum (Exhibit B).
I The AMM has been reviewing both of these proposals and has formulated a policy on the
management ofregional growth. The AMM policy blends the strongest elements of the two
proposals and articulates additional elements which were not addressed in either proposal.
I Recommendation
The Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution 96-46.
I
I
,.
I
I' .. ~
firf.lf6/T A
I. STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
I CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
1 RESOLUTION 96-46
RESOLUTION ENDORSING A METROPOLITAN
GROWTH POLICY
I WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council estimates that the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area
(TCMA) will increase by 330,000 households and 650,000 people by the year 2020; and
I WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council is reviewing Growth Options for the TCMA as it relates
to the provision of necessary public improvements to accommodate this growth while
I maintaining the high quality of life residents of the TCMA currently enjoy; and
WHEREAS, the City of Arden Hills (City) is a municipal corporation in the TCMA; and
I WHEREAS, the City is also concerned about the long term physical and financial health ofthe
TCMA; and
I WHEREAS, the City is a member of the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities (AMM)
.. and has councilmembers which serve on various AMM committees; and
WHEREAS, the AMM has thoroughly reviewed the metropolitan growth options as proposed
I by the Metropolitan Council and the Builders Association of the Twin Cities (BATC); and
WHEREAS, the AMM has adopted a metropolitan growth policy which blends the strongest
I elements of the Metropolitan Council and BATC proposals and articulates additional elements
which were not addressed in either proposal; and
I WHEREAS, the City supports the policy adopted by the AMM on growth options for the
TCMA.
I NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arden Hills,
Minnesota that the policy adopted by the AMM on metropolitan growth should be adopted by the
I Metropolitan Council as the preferred growth option.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
I THIS 8TH DAY OF JULY, 1996.
DENNIS PROBST, MAYOR
I ATTEST:
.. BRIAN FRITSINGER, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
I
.' ~ ~u"~'r l3 1//8
I LMC lletin
~ ities
kagu,z of }.[jmte~ola. Cities
CW<:$ promoting excflfleTJc<l
I ~umber 14 April 19, 1996
I Met Council report identifies regional development options
I Andrea AlhulOn Council offici:J.l:s. st.:,u~d several times of issues, impacts, and potential
th::J.t they are not recommending difficulties.
I Representatives from the Metro- expanding the M~[ Council's Craig Rapp. Director of Commu-
politJn Council presented their new jurisdiction. nity Development for the Met Council,
report Groa'th Options for the Twin The report identifies three options st.:!.ted that they are currently surveying
Cities Aferropolitan Area to a group of for how futur~ grmvth could be the landscape and listening to various
. city offici:lls at a recent Association of accornrnod:lted: the- Current Trend constituency groups, including the
t-.lctropolitan Municipalitie,' Metro- option. the Concentr:J.ted Development A~lM. Buildas' AssociCltion, Citizens'
politan Agencies committee meeting. option, and tht: Gro\vth Centers option. League. and the Land Stewardship
I The 1995 Legislature requested the The Current Trend option assumes Project.
report. and asked that it project likely th<:n single-family housing is the Additionally, in an offon to create
growth pattern of the region. The Met preferred land use and the location of more effective working relationships
Council plans to use the report to housing and jobs follo\vs historic with the various metro area communi~
Ie develop and establish a preferred pa[[ems and market demand with the ties, the ~letropo(itan Council is
development pattern for the Twin Cities expansion of the r...l USA in stages developing the Local Community
region. Even though it is dear that the based on local comprehensive plans. Outreach Program. Under this new
I region now e,'(,[ends far beyond the The Concentrated Development program, [he region is. divided into
existing seven county area, Met option focuses on increasing the secwrs. each of which has its own
popubtion density in th~ urban portion se:tor representative. These individu~
of the region and prohibits expansion als will serve as intermediaries between
I of the MUSA until af,er 2020 while the Met Council and the local officials.
instead focusing on redevelopment and The intent is to streamline the commu-
reinvestment. The Growth Centers nication process. and overcome some of
I option incorpor:ltes mixed.use centers. the difficulties encountered in the past.
(including business, commercial, and A copy of Growth Options for the
residential uses) developed and TI\'in Cities Metropolitan Area can be
I ch:mneled toward certain areas of the ob,ained by calling the Metropolitan
region. At this point. the Met Council Council at (612) 291-6359 and
"'-"QuId like [0 use these models as a requesting Publication no.
basis for identification and discussion 78-96-003. t
I
.
I
i'
I
-
7J~ ~y( '.
I
-.
April 19, 1996 I
Local Governmental Unit .
Metropolitan Region
Dear Local Official, I
Enclosed please find a c'1'/ of the Executi ve Summary and full report of Tire High C051 of Sprawl: A
Twin Cities Mt'tropolitan rea Urban Land 5u/,pll/ Anall/sf;; and Recommendatio1l;; jor Managing Gro.wth
contracted for b{, the Builders Association 0 the Twin Cities (BATCl with a team of expert regional I
consultants in t le area of re~ional land use and housing policy. As a local unit of government
official, we believe you will ind this study a useful tool as growth policies are debate under the
leadership of the Metropolitan Council over the next several months.
Over the past weeks as we have pre~ared for the public presentation of our data. We have spent time I
with members of the Metropolitan ouncil and staff. \-Ie have been very teased with the reception
of our study in general, and specifically with the acceptance of the soun ness of our land use and
availability data. I
Background:
[n the foil of 1995 we undertook a studv designed to empirically determine how much land was
available for development in the metro 21rea when you took into consideration: land used for Or eI
dedicated to a public purpose, land dedicated for environmental uses such as preservation of
wetlands, C'lnd land used for large lot dt'velopment. Looking at the current ~.fUSA area our data
showed us there would oc only about three veas of land sU~fk left unless we took serious steps now
to more efficiently and effectIvely use our land. We basel uture hoUsi1\~ needs on Metropolitan I
Council projections and on the fact the Council expects 80'lc of future deve opment to occur on the
fringe of currently d~"elofing communities. Consequently, our study also analyzed and mapped
barTlers. to the expansIOn 0 our urban area.
Melhodolo~lj: I
Ourplol\11i'ng consultant, John Shardlow and his staff at DSU interviewed 23 citieson the developing
edges of the Metro, and ~athered their land availability data that ,"vas later incorporated in the
Summary and Study. We elieve the facts speak clearlv for themselves and we invite you to carefully I
review the attached materials. ~
The shortage of available land for future development and the resulting high cost of land in our
region I COnH~S as no surprise to manv of you. \\e bdic\'l' these basic facts are compelling and will I
sustain themselves through many flours of debate as we work to determine approhriate growth
folicies for the region. However the data is only the beginning. The recommendatIOns isted on page
1 of the Executive Summary are issues and ideas we will \vant to be discussing with you in more
detail. I
.
I
--
1325 East 79th Street, Suite 6, Bloomington, !v!innesota 55425-1196
Phone (612) 851-9242 ol'.lain Fax (612) 851-9560' Parade Fax (612) 851-9570 I
I' ~ 7t'1>
I With what appears to be only about a 3 year land supply left in the 23 developing communities we
I- surveyed, expansion of the MUSA, wise use of what land we have left, and vigorous and appropriate
in-fill are the tools we have available to provide affordable, life-cycle housing for our generation. our
parents, our children and our grandchildren who make Metro, Minnesota our home.
We look forward to meetinFi with you and working with you over the coming months as the Council
I ~nd staff receive more pub ie input to the growth policy debate.
I j)~ ~/J-J 1;~~,
^~
I Dan Herbst, Chairperson Karen Christofferson
Public Policy Committee Public Policy Director
I
I Note: The study will also be presented at the Aril 24th Sensible Land Use Coalition program. If you
have an interest in hearing our presentation at t1at time, please call SLUC at 474-3302.
I
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ft
I
-
~ 'I
~(\t\Execu ti ve Summary I
-I
r------.,.. r- --, .
I L__J I
'c:.~'::..~-iRi" ',' - ':
r , . .. """]20";' . . I
.)j};f~~P':J~1~~'i;~):T. . I
{, ~~.:: '" ,.,-. I
I:"':,'-:~-,." -'" f'~.~;'-~'.:
l"~'~'_' (q.'::'l" ...
r--;:.~~~?<:~J ~1;~!_~:";:.~,' : I
I...,.",,,,. ~:
r-~.r,:~~~ ~~ ":.,-..' l
"""'1 ,...,.., 1
rl".~ff&6 - . r..~~~; \ I
I. . ~f:.. . ,
~-'c,,:!!~2~JrO
I
I
..
I
Prepared by: I
Dahlgren, Shardlow & Uban, Inc. I
Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd.
Doherty, Rumble & Butler I
In Conjunction with: I
Bugbee, Anton & Associates, Inc.
Boland & Associates, Inc. .
The Maxfield Research Group
Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik Associates
Mona, Meyer McGrath & Gavin/Shandwick I
Diddams Consulring
..
I
-- H
I' ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 5/i1
~e This report and study have beenfimded by the Bu.ilders Association of the Twin Cities (BATC).
I
I BATC BOARD OF DIRECTORS BATC LAND USE TASK FORCE
BUILDERS
Todd Bjerstedt Dan Herbst, Chair
I Dean Flackey Terry Forbord
Kent Jefferson Peter Gualtieri
I Gary Laurent Hans Hagan
Jean Mason Jim Johnston
I Bruce Nedegaard Gary Laurent
Curt Ostrom Bruce Pankonin
Lowell Pratt Jim Stanton
I Chuck Ryan Dennis Chuba
Curt Swanson Joan Archer
I ASSOCIA TES Karen Christofferson - Public Policy Director
.. Richard Berg
Marty Christianson
Deborah Earl
I Duane Meyer
Michelle Olson
I CONSULTANT TEAM
I Dahlgren, Shardlow, and Uban
Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd.
I Doherty, Rumble & Butler
I Arthur Andersen, Inc.
Bugbee Anton & Associates, Inc.
Boland & Associates, Inc.
I The Maxfield Research Group
Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik Associates
Mona, Meyer McGrath & Gavin/Shandwick
I Diddams Consulting
f' Executive Summary
.
------- ----
w~8 I 'I
Purpose - Need for this Report .1
BATC sponsored this report for several reasons: I
o There is a shortage in urban residential land in this Metro Region that I
artificially escalates the cost of land
0 Shortages in the supply of urban residential land coupled Vvith the increase in I
prices for this land, result in limited housing choices for our generation, our
parents, our children, and our grandchildren I
o When available land and choices are limited, sustaining the environment also I
becomes more challenging
o These limitations cost taxpayers increased dollars (current land use patterns I
have placed in jeopardy an estimated $1.5 billion of taxpayers money)
o High development costs and limited choices increase sprawl I
Objectives of this Report --
o To show the need to limit unnecessary urban sprawl (urban sprawl is the I
random development ofunsewered large lots and the non-contiguous, leapfrog I
development of sewered subdivisions that create physical and social barriers
to the orderly and economical extension of urban services)
o To document the amount of available urban residential land in comparison to .
that needed for the region's future population I
o To examine the relationship between land supply and the cost of housing I
o To analyze and illustrate the significant barriers that limit the region's g'rowth
options and to share this information with the Metropolitan Council and others I
working to guide the future shape of the region
o To provide information about the total contribution that housing makes to the I
regional economy. -.
Executive Summary
.
I' 2
7113
I
I- Guiding Principles
I BA TC believes that there are a number of guiding principles which should serve as the
cornerstones of the regional growth management system:
I First, the region must strive to use its land resources and existing infrastrUcture
efficiently, avoiding wasteful duplication wherever possible.
I Second, in order to provide an adequate supply of affordable housing for our growing
I population and to foster reinvestment in the core of the region, rnarket forces must be
given primary consideration. If there isn't a solid market demand for the types,
I location and cost of housing to be built, no amount of subsidy will be able to
produce a desirable regional system.
I Third, governmental regulations, from minimum lot and house sizes, park dedication,
street standards, public facility exactions, and wetland, woodland and other
.. environmental protection requirements, all increase the amount of required land and the
costs of housing construction.
I The fourth guiding principle is that an adequate and diverse housing stock is a
prerequisite to the sustained economic prosperity of the region. Simply stated, if housing
. is not available for the area's diverse labor force, business growth, job creation, and a
healthy regional economy \\il1 not be sustained.
I
I
I
I
I
~
Executive Summary
I
~'b 3 I
How Much Land Is Needed to Accommodate I
Projected Household Growth to the Year 2020? -.
The Metropolitan Council expects 80% of the projected new households (264,000) will be .
located at the developing edges of the region. This will require 132,000 acres ofland at a net
density of2 units per acre. .
GROWTH COMPARISON I
Actual Change ProjectedCharigei I
1970 -1995 1995 -.2020 ....
Population 575,000 .
i.. Households 367,000
Employment 640,000 380,000 I
.1995 Met Council Projections
0 80% of330,000 households = 264,000 households expected at the ..
developing edge of the region. I
0 264,000 households at 2 units per acre = 132,000 acres ofland needed I
I
I
.
.
I
Execulive Summary ..
.
.' Determination of Available Land within the MUSA'1/1,
,
,- The approach taken in this study relied upon the assumption contained in the rvletropolitan
. Council Report to the Minnesota Legislature, "Gro\\1h Options for the Twin Cities Metropolitan
Area" (January, 1996), that 80% of the regions gro\\1h in the next 25 years will occur at the
developing edges of the Metro Area. Using this gro\\1h assumption, 23 developing communities
I partially inside and partially outside the existing MUS A (Figure I) were selected for this study.
All of these communities are experiencing growth and are considered 'developing' according to
, the Metropolitan Council. Although there are a few additional communities with land both
inside and outside the MUSA, it was determined that the selected communities would give the
best representation of land supply in the developing portions of the Metropolitan Area. We
, found a total of 15,956 acres of unplatted residential land and an additional 10,676 vacant
platted lots within the MUSA of these 23 communities.
I Twin Cities Metro Area FIGURE 1
Interview Communities
, --
Ie
I
I
I
--
I ---
Gr
I '\;-- _: ~-
. I
----{
{
;-:,,~~';~i C01'Ilmuniliei Intervie.....ed
, _ 1991MU~ 'f~~g.~
iMt
]
it "'14J'.'l.l,~ ...-'''r......
..~........-,
,. .,..,..
Executive Summary
I
--.-
(O~'b 5 ..
UltiMUSA .
-,
The UltiMUSA boundary represents a line surrounding the area which can be served by existing .
or planned Metropolitan Council wasteviater facilities. One of the first attempts to define an
ultimate service boundary was in 1968. That boundary was based primarily on planned facilities, I
new service areas, and estimated populations. In subsequent years, facilities were constructed to
serve this estimated increase in population. This BA TC study cites the UtliMUSA in Figure 2,
as the area which could be reasonably served by the existing Metropolitan Wastewater I
Treatment System. Areas beyond the boundary could be served by new regional systems -
separate from the Metro System in place today. I
The UltiMUSA is based on the following general criteria and assumptions. I
o The UltiMUSA boundary follows watershed boundaries.
o If the majority of a community is within the major watershed and regional service I
area, the remainder of the community will also be included in the UltiMUSA. ..
o Communities currently served outside major watersheds via lift stations and force
mains will continue to be served. I
o The capacity of the metropolitan sewage disposal system is defined by critical I
components or "bottlenecks". A bottleneck is considered to be an incoITectable
obstruction. Examples would include a required treatment plant expansion or a major I
interceptor reconstruction. The former may be a bottleneck because of regulation
constraints and the latter because of economic constraints.
I
I
I
I
Executive Summary ..
I
I "h86
~- Barriers to Urban Development
I Utilizing the UltiMUSA defined above, we analyzed the feasibility of extending the existing
I MUSA out to the UltiMUSA. This area of potential MUSA service between the existing MUSA
and the UltiMUSA became the, 'study area' (Figure 3). First obstacles to the orderly extension
I of the current system into this study area were identified. Obstacles were defined as land uses
that would remain undeveloped or would substantially add to the cost to extend municipal
services through or around. The first obstacle identified was parks (Figure 4), next industrial and
I public lands "non-residential" (Figure 5), then wetlands (Figure 6), and finally large lots
(Figure 7). The composite of all of these barriers is shown on Figure 8.
, STUDY AREA
I CATEGORY ACRES
STUDY AREA 550,619
I BARRlERS 260,554
DEVELOPABLE STUDY AREA . 290,064
.. BARRIER TYPE . ............... ACREAGE .....
I . 10 acre and less 102,255
. 20 acre and less 28.231
I . .
Wetlands 122.278
.
Parks .. . 38,350
I .
Industrial . 5,536
Vacant Industrial 4.858
I Public/Semi-Public 2.585
Vacant Public/Semi.Public 6.591
I Airports 1,475
TOTAL BARRIERS' 260.554
I . The total is l~ss than the sum of the parts because some barriers overlap each other
I
it Executive Summary
I
I 7'
TWInCiti".IIe~oArea FIGURE 2 TwinCiti".IIe~oArea FIGURE 3:
UltiJ\1USA Study Area i I
)'
~ ~ '~I
-r --.- ---r.
1.1 ,I L
( Ii. ....-, I
-~~- -~.~ ~~J ~L~c-L~' I
I 1'-::- ~ :_~'-:'"<. ~-) -- ':
--1 . LL~~ -~ ~-==-~ ~,
, "Y"7-i~' 1- I r.
r _ '.... -: r~' I ;
i ;'"~l--~: ;----r,.-p, - r I
:"/.-'"'J. , '('j
t \ I r
~~,- ) I
I
, I
I
- II
~lrnMU~ .!
- -.... I - .-.- I
I
ll>. -= ~i I
- - - ~!
---.J' ........._L~---""-='" ",,,,,,,,~,, ,~- ,,;::,",-=-..,,1
TwinCiti".\t'~oArea FIGURE 4 TwinCiti".IIe~oArea FIGURE 5 AI
Parks in Study Area Non.Residential Land Use i ..
) in,~~aJT; ) I
~ ~..~,.
1.( I. -eif
,._=-,.I-LJj. ( I I
. .~,
rf2~~3~1 t:~~7
---.J f.'~-' " -- l. I
~~:,~) fv---L-~:.,
., ~, : . ,. ~
1 (:::"'-.': 7-'--:
..... ,', I
---=='-=--~~';-:;' I
0.. I
s [' -'1
i~ ,II oj II
i I ,
i r I
--i
CJ 1'H$ .loW$.'. D2J l'ILbll~m~Puhlk'
c::=J u.....' LoI5"'<frA~1 t~-';'\:-,I Ail'poJrt I
II!'!! 1';1.1'0 lI!m \'il;.Jnt Indumlal ,
- U"m..MU" w= mil =.
dm ~ -l,;ltirn~I:!Mli" ~
. ,
.... '._~
",......... ...,......."
Executive Summary
I
I 8
(~~J
I
.-
I
I
, FIGURE 6 Twin Cilie; '\\,t;o Area FIGURE 7
Large Lots in Study Area
,
,
I ( i
/'
, I
,
,
I I
I '3 -~
,- , ;
\' I
~
Ie d d
. . I
.
I
,... I ow I
I i ,
--I I
-- i
I
C]I'nSMUSA C:J '"5 .'o\U~ I
I n-;La'1eLDISllld1A~1 c=tJl.1r1_t.arSll."iy""'" I
Ii'JiJWe~dl _illa.l0Al:muodSmi.lte'
a _ UItim.lIlMUSA ~:~;:3J =: _lolalIJAI;ruondSm...ue' C:'~:;'~II
, _ lJtt:m'lI!MUSA -'--:-1
!Pt~. .. ."..........
I ...."'..,"
I
I
.
it Execulive Summary
I
----
9 .
Twin Cities Metro Area FIGURE 8 I
Barriers to Expansion i -.
'---- ~-------i
I -- " ,
LJ '
.- -_-' I I
I i ~_J I I
I I I .
' I
I ! I , I
I I , I
........ ! I I I --------]
" 'I l
............ ",--_/\ J..... -1_
... --~....._- \ ~, i \ I
I <!
,
-, ,
I
~- -" .0
.- .
- -..,' .----
-----
;;. .
-~. ., ._..- -_.~..~ - - ,-'~--... I
._:I~:-'L: '-'-- ....'
--- - -.-
- ---:':;- --
l3 . .. [ .
-.. ~,
----"
'. -
_.----'. --- .:
~~__._..-,.u...___._____.. . . 0 ..
_ .. u I
..
.- I ----:------. I
I I i -
'---------. , ; -
I "., I
I '.~ i
I I ~ .
Lm r--'---; -- ------:--- --.!
I I
I I
, I , s-- j ,
I i .-, I ~..J i I
.. -L____ , -~l i
" I
I I
.J I L--1!
I
, I I
I I
~- ,
--------1'
)
f
-------,
~_ 1995 MUSA I
~.==i large lot Study Area
_ Barriers (wetlands, parks, large lots)
~ Ultimate MUSA J, 'I ~:I~ I
1Mt:1 "\;,1:11 )l-'
. ." II ];.
~~~ ."".:.'c ..
wnms~ il'M::tm;l;I'~t~
L'JI&:\,lIi\ll!lt\o..'l:i
~X".t<r~'t~
;:.ni ~:"
4.l.:t.ad.IH~ ~::-~~'ll:4.."f.K'.~
I
I "ilia
I Summary of Findings 13
I- I. Housing is a major component of the regional economy and the availability of an
, adequate and diverse supply of housing is a prerequisite to continued economic
development, job creation and prosperity.
I 2. One of the main reasons why the region experienced the success that it did over the past
20 years was that the original MUSA included a substantial urban land supply.
I Communities in the path of growth were required to prepare and adopt plans for full
urbanization. As a result, the majority of the gro\"th in the region up until 1990 occurred
I at urban densities.
3. The existing urban land supply is inadequate to accommodate the projected gro\"th of
I 330,000 households to the year 2020. The limited remaining land supply 'within the
MUSA line has caused a significant increase in land prices which directly adds to the cost
, of housing.
Ie 4. Unsewered large lots subdivisions have already consumed 130,486 acres ofland that
could have been economically served by the regional wastewater treatment system and
developed at urban densities. If this area had been developed at a density of2.5 units per
I acre, it could have accommodated 326,215 households, an amount roughly equivalent to
the Metro areas' projected gro\\th to the year 2020.
, 5. Instead, this 130,486 acres will accommodate only 21,747 households when all of the
I large lots are built upon. This large lots pattern has created both physical and social
barriers to the orderly and economical extension of urban services. The failure to provide
and protect urban reserves has already added between $650 million and $1.33 billion to
, the cost of developing the remaining portions of the UtliMUSA. Immediate strategic
action is needed to successfully accommodate the growth projected for this area.
I 6. The Twin Cities Metropolitan Area is no longer limited to the original seven counties.
I The Metro Region extends at least into the 13 County MSA, and beyond if one considers
commuter patterns. This change must be recognized to arrive at a successful growth
management strategy for the coming decades.
I 7. Non-MUSA related planning issues delay and obstruct the MUSA expansion process.
it Executive Summary
I
------ ------
-----
l c,~ tt> 11 ..
8. Past failures to maintain an adequate urban land supply, protect urban reserves and I
properly control rural development, has contributed to explosive gro\\1h in not only the
areas outside the MUSA line within the seven county area and around free-standing -,
groVvth centers, but also in the counties that surround the seven counties and beyond,
9. The region must take immediate action to economically serve areas that can be physically I
connected to the regional wastewater treatment system.
I
Recommendations ,
1. Expand MUSA Now. I
Based on assumptions in the Regional Growth Options Report, approximately 264,000 ,
households have to be accommodated in the cities on the edges of the developed portion of the
Metro Area in the next 25 years. The information contained in this report demonstrates that if I
50% of the area within the Ultimate MUSA boundary is developed at urban densities, only
approximately 176,450 households can be accommodated. This urban land shortage is growing
daily. Prompt remedial action is needed. ..
The effect of the development patterns that have been allowed in some portions of the I
UltiMUSA area make it unlikely that it will be cost effective to extend sewers to serve them.
Where it is still possible to extend sewers and facilitate development at urban densities, the I
Metropolitan Council should extend the MUSA line to the UltiMUSA as soon as possible.
Rather than attempting to parcel out incremental MUSA expansions, the Metropolitan Council
should take bold action to achieve sewered densities in as much of the remaining UltiMUSA .
area as possible.
2. Facilitate and Support Market Based Infill and Redevelopment in the Core. I
The Growth Options Report assumes that 66,000 households can be accommodated through I
either infill or redevelopment, within the developed portion of the region. It is impossible to
know whether this number is realistic. What is clear is that the Area should work very hard to ,
clean up polluted land, facilitate redevelopment, and work with core communities to prepare and
implement market focused infill and redevelopment programs. Absent these activities, it is very I
unlikely that the projected infill will occur. Government's role in this process should be to
create an environment for private industry and market forces to operate effectively. --
Execulive Summary
I
1- "h~12
. Government should assist communities in removing barriers to reinvestment and in leveling the
playing field with the developing suburbs. Local initiatives should be rewarded on a project
" specific basis, as the diversity of opportunities and resources available to local communities are
better understood.
. 3, Adopt Flexible, Simplified MUS A Expansion Process
I Even if the Metropolitan Council expands to the recommended UltiMUSA boundary now, it is
inevitable that additional urban area expansions will be necessary in the future. The
I Metropolitan Land Planning Act and the MUSA were intended to guide and accommodate
growth in a rational and economical manner. A new process for accomplishing MUSA
expansions must be developed. This process should be fact based, understanding that an ample
I urban land supply is an essential component of a healthy regional economy. Non-MUSA related
planning issues should be dealt with separately.
I 4. Delineate and Preserve Urban Transition Areas
I One of the key parts of the upcoming round of comprehensive plan amendments should be the
identification of urban reserve areas within the planned sewer service area. Similar to the Urban
Ie Transition Areas in the recently approved Scott County comprehensive plan, these areas must
include strong measures to preserve them for future urbanization. Counties and townships with
. jurisdiction over these areas should prepare and adopt plans for future urban streets and these
plans must be coordinated with adjacent municipalities to insure the dedication of necessary
future utility easements. Iflarge lots are allowed in these areas, clustering should be strongly
I encouraged, but all large lot development must be approved along with a future urban overlay, or
"ghost plat" to facilitate future urban development.
I 5, Adopt Restrictive Rural Density Standards to Protect Urban Transition Areas
I BA TC supports a general rural land density of 1 unit per 40 acres. If clustering is required then
densities up to a maximum of 4 units per 40 acres may be allowed (subject to urban overlay
I platting described above). Rural land that is located \\ithin urban reserve areas should be
preserved for future urban development. Therefore, BA TC does not support the practice of
I permanent open space dedication \\ithin urban growth corridors.
I
t- Execlllive Summary
I
l~'b J3 -.
6. Develop Transportation Standards and Planning Mechanisms to Allow Continued
Growth In Core Areas In Spite of Existing Traffic Congestion. I
Several MUSA expansion requests have been delayed because of congested levels of service ..
on adjacent roadways. This problem v,ill also affect the redevelopment of many areas \'<ithin
the Twin Cities area. Such a single-minded view of transportation, which focuses only on the I
number of cars entering and, exiting a site on a given roadway often results in limiting
development opportunities, contrary to regional planning objectives. I
7, Examine Local Regulatory Controls and Provide Incentives to Create Value/Cost
Housing Opportunities at the local level. I
S, Develop Innovative Approaches to Financing Needed Infrastructure Expansions and I
Improyements to Encourage the Use of Existing Infrastructure.
9. Establish Adequate urban land supply as the 5th metropolitan system (the current I
systems are transportation, wastewater treatment, aviation, and parks),
10, Examples of other ideas that merit further consideration: I
. Congestion pricing ..
. Developer installed infrastructure
. Land use board of adjustment
. Tax policy I
I
Conclusion
The findings of the BA TC study confirm that there is a serious shortage of urban land to I
accommodate the region's future housing needs. This shortage is causing sharply rising land I
prices, which in turn lead to increased housing cost. Currently, this increase in urban
residential land cost is causing more people to look outside the MUSA for their housing I
needs, The result is urban sprawl on the edges of the Metro Area.
This sprawl causes higher costs to the region and individuals over the long term by limiting I
housing choices, and increasing the cost for roads, sewers, water and other urban services.
Without a new plan for growth, these costs will continue to increase unnecessarily into the I
billions of dollars.
Executive Summary --
I
I
~e CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
MEMORANDUM
I DATE: July 2, 1996
I TO: Brian Fritsinger, City Administrator
,
I FROM: Dwayne Stafford, Public "Vorks Superintendent Yr
SUBJECT: Oak Avenue Sewer Repairs
I Back!!round
The Arden Hills Public Works Department had earlier requested the City Engineer to televise
I any sanitary sewer line which lays under a street scheduled for reconstruction. Upon completion
of this process on the streets being re-constructed in 1996 it was determined that Oak A venue has
I 10 areas where the pipe has failed. Two of these are related to improper installation of service
laterals, and the others were probably caused by poor bedding in the pipe area.
I Estimated Costs for Repair
Mr. Greg Stonehouse has solicited bids from the three companies in this area who specialize in
sewer repairs made from above ground. Only two of the three companies contacted by Mr.
Ie Stonehouse submitted proposals to make the necessary repairs. Those companies were;
Infratech Infrastructure Technologies Inc.
I Brooklyn Park, Minnesota at $13,934.00
Buchen Environmental Services Inc.
I Chaska, MN at $17,535.00
Repair Methods
I Both Infratech and Buchen pull the repair materials into place with cables and use a TV camera
to align the repair precisely.
I Infratech uses a foam backed sheet of stainless steel which looks similar to a piece of stove pipe.
This is called a repair link and is available in up to three feet lengths. These links can be placed
I end to end for longer repairs. After positioning the repair link an inflatable device placed within
the repair link is pressurized thus squeezing the repair link tight against the inside of the pipe
where by design it is locked firmly in place. This seals out any soil or water infiltration. The
I repair link is approximately 1/2" thick, but beveled on the ends. This creates a 1" loss in pipe
diameter which may affect cleaning accessories designed to fit the pipe closely.
I These repairs have been known to fail on occasion as the link pipe has a tendency to slip within
the pipe, again leaving a potential problem area unprotected.
~
I
I
Buchen uses an emerging technology which other cities use to line entire segments of their sewer _I
I
system. In this method a seamless tube of polyester yams is impregnated with resin which
hardens in about two hours. The sewer line is temporarily blocked off and cleaned, then the tube I
is guided into place enclosed in a protective poly sack. When positioned properly the resin
impregnated tube is forced out'of the protective sack and held in place with air pressure until
cured. This leaves a fiberglass type lining approximately 311 6" thick in the existing pipe. This I
method should result in a repair that will last the duration of the sewers remaining effective life.
Recommendation I
The Public Works Department recommends the repair work be done by Buchen Environmental
Services. Although this technology is relatively new to this area for repairing short segments it
has been used extensively for lining complete areas in some towns. This process is more I
expensive, however the Public Works staff is reluctant to use metal in a corrosive environment.
The difference in the thickness of each product and the potential slippage of the link pipe are also
concerns. I
I
1)1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
MEMORANDUM
I
DATE: July 3,1996
I TO: Brian F,ritsinger, City Administrator
k
I FROM: Dwayne Stafford, Public Works Superintendent
SUBJECT: 1996 Street Improvements; Change Order #1
I
Backl!round
I Pine Tree Drive is one of the streets scheduled for an overlay in the 1996 Street Improvements
Plan. The City Engineers having provided Ramsey County with a copy of this year's street
improvement plans, received word from the County of a possible conflict at the intersection of
I Pine Tree Drive and County Road E.
In order for the new overlay to match the existing pavement on County Road E and the existing
I curb at the edge of Pine Tree Drive, it will be necessary to mill a portion of the existing
bituminous surface. Typically a 6 foot wide swath would be made along each curb and a 12 foot
wide area would be milled where Pine Tree Drive butts up to the edge of County Road E. This
.. milling will be to a depth of approximately I 1/2 inches.
I The County has reminded the Arden Hills Public Works Department and the City Engineers that
the loop detectors which control the semaphores at this intersection, are typically buried only I
1/2 to 2 1/2 inches in the pavement and that milling this area may damage or completely destroy
I the existing detectors.
Recommendation
I The Public Works Department recommends the City Council approve Change Order #1
appropriating $7,317.40 for the replacement of the loop detectors if necessary. The Public
Works staff also recommends the City Engineer be instructed to take all precautions possible to
I protect and save the existing loop detectors, there by saving any repair or replacement costs.
I
I
I
f'
I
- -