HomeMy WebLinkAboutCCP 07-29-1996
'HIe.-
. AGENDA
.- ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL MEETING
NEW BRIGHTON COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MONDAY, JULY 29,1996,7:30 P.M.
I 7:30 P.M. 1. Call to Order/Roll Call
I 7:30 P.M. 2. Agenda Adoption
I 7:35 P.M. 3. Approval of Minutes
a. July 8, 1996, Regular Council Meeting
b. July 15, 1996, Council Worksession Meeting
I c. July 15, 1996, Special Council Meeting
7:40 P.M. Consent Calendar
4.
I a. Creation of Newsletter Committee and Appointments to Committee
b. LMC Request Regarding Public Rights-of-Way
c. Claims and Payroll
I 7:45 P.M. 5. Public Comments
.. 7:50 P.M. 6. Unfinished and New Business
a. Perry Park Final Pay Estimate
I b. Karth Lake Ravine/Lake Josephine Outlet
509 Project Final Pay Estimate
c. 1996 Street Improvements Pay Estimate #1
I d. 1996 Trail Improvement Project Change Order
e. Planning Case #95-23, Buetow Final Plat Extension
f. Planning Case #95-16, Balfany Preliminary Plat, Thorn Drive
I g. Planning Case #96-08, Ramsey County/Albjerg Minor Subdivision, 1680 Oak Avenue
h. Planning Case #96-11, Michael Welsh, Administrative Appeal
I 9:00 P.M. 7. Administrator Comments
9:10 P.M. 8. Council Comments
I c. t\ ~,..",
, '\ 9. Adjourn
'9;25-P..M.-
I 9:30 P.M. 10. Executive Closed Session
a. Discuss Pending Litigation
I The above times may vary depending upon length of issue discussion.
..
I
-
-,
AUGUST MEETINGS SEPTFMBER MEETINGS .
-I
August 12 Couucil Meeting 7:30 P.M. September 4 Planning Commission 7:30 P.M.
August 19 Council Worksession 4:30 P.M. September 9 Council Meeting 7:30 P.M.
August 21 Economic Dev. Committee 8:00 A.M. September 11 Human Rights Committee 7:30 P.M. I
August 22 Finance Committee 7:30 P.M. September 16 Council W orksession 4:30 P.M.
August 26 Council Meeting 7:30 P.M. September 18 Economic Dev. Committee 8:00 A.M. I
September 19 Public Works/Safety 7:30 P.M.
September 24 Park & Rec. Committee 7:00 P.M. I
September 26 Finance Committee 7:30 P.M.
September 30 Council Meeting 7:30 P.M. I
I
I
eI
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
~' ..
~e DRAFT
I MINUTES
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA
I REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
JULY 8, 1996
7:30 P.M. - NEW BRIGHTON COUNCIL CHAMBERS
I
I CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Dennis Probst called to order the regulat
I City Council meeting at 7:31 p.m.
Present: Mayor Dennis Probst, Councilmembers Beverly Aplikowski, Dale Hicks,
I and Paul Malone.
I Absent: Councilmember Susan Keim.
Also present were: City Administrator, Brian Fritsinger; City Accountant, Terry Post;
Ie Public Works Superintendent, Dwayne Stafford; Community Development Director,
Kevin Ringwald; Parks & Recreation Director, Cindy Walsh; and Recording Secretary,
Carla Wirth.
I
ADOPT AGENDA
I MOTION: Aplikowski moved and Hicks seconded a motion to adopt the agenda for the July
I 8, 1996, Regular City Council meeting as presented. The motion carried
unanimously (4-0).
I APPROVAL OF MINUTES
June 10, 1996, Regular Council Meeting
I Page 10, seventh paragraph, second line: "She advised she is planning to go to
Rochester and that this event is well attended by New Brighton representatives so
I she hopes to be joined by others from Arden Hills."
June 24, 1996, Regular Council Meeting
I No corrections.
if
I
~ .~
DRAFT
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JULY 8. 1996 2 .-
MOTION: Malone moved and Aplikowski seconded a motion to approve the June 10, 1996, I
Regular Council Meeting minutes as corrected and the June 24, 1996, Regular
Council Meeting minutes as presented. The motion carried unanimously (4-0). I
CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Claims and Payroll I
MOTION: Malone moved and Hicks seconded a motion to approve the Consent Calendar as I
presented, and authorize execution of all necessary documents contained therein.
The motion carried unanimously (4-0). I
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Mayor Probst invited the audience to address the Council on any issue not already on the agenda. I
Gene Schmidt, 1628 Chatham Avenue, distributed information regarding a layout of his I
property, a letter from the City Administrator, and assessments levied for each property
benefitting by the improvement. He first addressed the layout of the land and noted the amount eI
of extensive improvements which were made with respect to drainage and curb work. However,
his property received none of these improvements yet is proposed to be assessed higher than any I
other property in the development for this particular improvement. He stated when he first
purchased this lot, he did not have to pay an "up charge" since he had to deal with traffic on the
corner lot. Yet, the assessments are calculated on the assumption that the improvements will I
increase the value of his property which is opposite of what he was told when he purchased this
corner lot.
Mr. Schmidt stated his opinion that the proposed assessment is not fair. He requested the I
Council to comment on whether it can make a determination to reduce the assessment or ifhe
will have to follow the appeal process tomorrow. I
Mr. Schmidt noted that when Chatham Avenue improvements were made in 1991, McCracken
Lane was not improved due to a budget shortfall and it was not scheduled the following year I
either.
Mayor Probst stated it is within the Council's purview to make findings but the Council did I
previously act to deny this appeal based on the rationale that Mr. Schmidt's property is being
treated similar to other properties and there was no differentiating issues. Mr. Schmidt stated he I
accepted this until he observed what had developed (no drainage improvements to his property).
..
I
I' DRAFT
I ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JULY 8. 1996 3
I- Councilmember Hicks asked which neighbor was not being assessed. Mr. Schmidt pointed out
I the property which is directly across from his lot in the area of the overlay. Councilmember
Hicks inquired what the blue colored lines represented on the map. Mr. Schmidt stated they
indicated the alignment of the storm sewer drain tile. He then reviewed the current drainage
I problems which this will correct.
Councilmember Hicks asked if curb and gutter are in front of Mr. Schmidt's property. Mr.
I Schmidt explained the project only included spot repairs to the curb and gutter in locations
needed to correct problems and all but three properties have had some spot curb improvements.
I Councilmember Malone reviewed that this project is to recycle the roadway, not totally rebuild
it, with repair/improvement to curb, gutter, and drainage, to be done where needed.
I Mr. Schmidt stated residents were told the cost to be assessed would be based on soil borings and
this was done.
I Councilmember Aplikowski questioned the area of the street which is being recycled. Mr.
Schmidt reviewed the area involved and pointed out his existing driveway access is on Chatham
.. A venue, not McCracken Lane.
Mayor Probst advised the options before the Council are to consider the appeal, reject the appeal,
I or make an adjustment. He explained when the assessment rate was established, it was not
known where the areas of corrections would be needed and the street is proposed to be assessed
based on front footage. Mayor Probst stated at this point, he sees no rationale to consider an
I adjustment. He then reviewed the process used to arrive at front footage and the City's
assessment policy for drainage improvements.
I Councilmember Hicks asked what Mr. Schmidt believes is fair. Mr. Schmidt stated his property
is not the largest sized but he is being assessed the highest amount. Councilmember Hicks
I pointed out the property is a corner lot and probably has the largest amount of footage on
McCracken Lane. Mr. Schmidt stated he is not interested in making an appeal and noted the
Mayor and Councilmembers are also property owners and understand "what is fair". He asserted
I the assessment calculations and formulas are not always fair and requested it be deviated from in
this case. Mr. Schmidt suggested the assessment be divided equally among the eleven properties.
Then, his property would be assessed the average of $1 ,675 which would still result in his
I property being assessed among those properties with the highest assessments.
Councilmember Hicks pointed out that to deviate from the standard formula as Mr. Schmidt is
I suggesting, three other properties would be slightly above $1,600.
it
I
DRAFT I
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JULY 8. 1996 4 I
-I
Councilmember Malone stated he appreciates Mr. Schmidt's argument but the Council represents
the residents as well, including having to pay for assessments themselves. He noted the trade-off I
if Mr. Schmidt's assessment is reduced, is that the money will have to come from other tax
payers to make up the difference. Councilmember Malone agreed there is no perfect way to
calculate assessments but the policy is to assess on a per front footage basis and try to be as fair I
as possible. However, this does not mean the assessments will be equal. He noted that
assessments calculated on a square footage basis would probably result in a similar situation.
Councilmember Malone pointed out the Council tries to be careful to use the assessment policy I
uniformly and only make adjustments if property cannot be built upon for some reason.
Generally, adjustments are not made for other reasons and undeveloped land is not the case with I
Mr. Schmidt's property. Councilmember Malone stated the City has done the best job possible in
looking at the interests of all parties and he believes the proposed assessment is as reasonably
appropriate as possible. Also, if the Council were to make an arbitrary adjustment, it may I
establish a precedent for others to request an adjustment. Councilmember Malone clarified that
drainage improvements are designed and constructed to benefit all property regardless of the
location of the actual drain. I
Mr. Schmidt stated no one else will be able to appeal because the deadline is tomorrow. ..
Councilmember Malone reiterated the need to find a solid basis in order to consider an
adjustment and stated he does not find that rationale with Mr. Schmidt's property. I
Mayor Probst inquired regarding the status of other appeals. Brian Fritsinger, City
Administrator, advised that one has been received but none on this recycling improvement. I
Mayor Probst noted if there had been no drainage problem to correct, McCracken Lane could
have been extended to the east property line and recycled from that point forward. But, this was I
not possible due to the need for drainage work. Since the recycling was necessary to install the
drain tile, Mayor Probst suggested this may be the basis to consider an adjustment. Also, the
amount of adjustment being requested is less than the City cost to become involved in the appeal I
process.
Councilmember Aplikowski noted the difference is $557. She stated that in principal she agrees I
with Councilmember Malone, that streets need to be assessed according to the assessment policy.
However, she is open to consideration since Mr. Schmidt's driveway is not on that front footage. I
Councilmember Aplikowski stated she is not prepared to make a decision on $557 but is willing
to discuss possibly one-half of that amount.
Mayor Probst agreed the Council meeting tonight is not the proper forum to play "lets make a I
deal" due to concern of precedent of future adjustments, but there are some issues which may ..
make a case for some modification.
I
!
I DRAFT
~. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JULY 8 1996 5
I Council member Hicks noted McCracken Lane is not being resurfaced all the way to Chatham
I A venue and suggested staff be asked to present a recommendation at the next meeting. He stated
that while he is sympathetic to Mr. Schmidt's request, the Council is in a position where it can no
longer adjust other assessments to cover the adjustment being requested by Mr. Schmidt.
I Mr. Fritsinger advised the assessment policy has been consistently applied with other comer lots
for a number of years. The assessment for Mr. Schmidt's property is based on this policy and
I any change would be not consistent with the policy. If the Council desires to revisit this issue, he
suggested they consider a specific motion. Mr. Fritsinger noted a special meeting has been
scheduled on July 15, 1996, and this request for adjustment could be considered at that time.
. Also, the Council could extend Mr. Schmidt's appeal date for one week so it can be considered at
that time.
I MOTION: Aplikowski moved and Hicks seconded a motion to table consideration ofMr.
Schmidt's request for an assessment adjustment to the special Council meeting of
I July 15, 1996 and to extend Mr. Schmidt's appeal deadline to July 17, 1996.
Councilmember Malone stated he would support the motion on the floor to allow further
.. discussion.
The motion carried unanimously (4-0).
I There were no other public comments.
. UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS
A. Planning Case #96-05, Control Data PUD, 4201 North Lexington Avenue
I Kevin Ringwald, Community Development Director, advised that Control Data Systems (CDS)
I is requesting approval of a PUD Master Plan and a Preliminary Minor Subdivision to facilitate
the potential sale of the building and property adjacent to 4290 Lexington Avenue (originally the
DynaMark building). Mr. Ringwald reviewed a site plan of the property and commented on
I staffs review of each of the three parcels relating to building and parking areas.
Mr. Ringwald provided more detail regarding Area I and reviewed the Parks and Recreation
I Commission recommendation for continued use of the parking area so it is in close proximity to
Cummings Park. They also recommend the dedication of the westerly 100 feet of the wooded
area. Staff recommends they be allowed to develop up to the easterly 25 feet of the wooded lot
I which is 200 feet wide, but that a 25 to 50 foot setback would only be acceptable with review to
assure adequate low level screening and buffering.
it
I
------- ---------------------- --------
DRAFT I
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JULY 8. 1996 6 .1
It was noted the Planning Commission unanimously recommends approval of the variance I
requests with the following conditions: I
I. Land Uses allowed by this PUD shall be those land uses described in the applicant's land
use chart (Exhibit A, page 3 of 2 I). Except, that the percentage to which the existing land I
uses currently exist on the site shall be adhered to or provisions are made for additional
parking;
2. Lot Coverage shall be a maximum of 30 percent and Parcels A- I and C maybe viewed I
jointly in determining the lot coverage;
3. Floor Area Ratio shall be a maximum of 0.6 and Parcels A-I and C may be viewed I
jointly in determining the Hoor area ratio;
4. Landscape Lot Area shall be 25 percent for Parcels A-I and C and 35 percent for Parcel I
A-2. Also, the three Key Landscape Elements as described by Exhibit A, page 21 of21,
shall be protected from disturbance; I
5. Parking for Parcels A-I and C shall be determined to have a current surplus of 171
parking spaces and Parcel A-2 shall be determined to have a current surplus of 41 parking ..
spaces. Also, the row of parking stalls adjacent to Fernwood Avenue shall be eliminated
and replaced with landscaping prior to any further site plan approvals are granted on I
Parcels A-lor C. The landscaping is to be reviewed by the Planning Commission and
consideration for approval by the City Council. The landscaping shall receive approval
by the City; I
6. Park dedication for land shall be granted and/or fees in lieu of dedication shall be
determined by the City Council after consideration and recommendation by the Parks and I
Recreation Committee;
7. Signage along Lexington Avenue shall be limited to the current level of sign age, all other I
signage shall be governed by the requirements ofthe Sign Code;
8. Architectural Design shall be consistent with the applicants description on Exhibit A, I
page 5 of21 and the requirements of the City Code, whichever is greater;
9. Skyway from the CDS campus (southwest part) and the CPI campus is acceptable, I
subject to City review and approval of the construction, aesthetics, and distribution of
liabilities ofthe skyway; I
10. Utilities shall be governed by the rules and regulations applicable at the time of review; ..
I
I DRAFT
I ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - Jl TL Y 8. 1996 7
~ 11. The East-West private street between Parcels A-I and B should not be dedicated as a
I public street (collector); and
12. Parcel B shall be analyzed by itself in relationship to the land development parameters
I and that those parameters shall not be flexed from what the City Code allows.
The Planning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary minor subdivision, subject
I to the following conditions:
1. Provision of the necessary drainage and utility easements, prior to Planning Commission
. consideration of the final minor subdivision;
2. Provision of the necessary vehicular cross access easements, prior to Planning
I Commission consideration of the final minor subdivision; and
3. Dedication and/or payment of the appropriate park dedication for Parcels A-2 and B, as
. determined by City Council.
.. Mr. Ringwald noted that the City Code requires a 4/5 vote of the Council to approve a PUD
master plan.
I Mayor Probst asked if the applicant accepts the proposed conditions. Walt Seiler, representing
CDS, stated they agree with all conditions except one, the 25 to 50 foot setback requirement into
the wooded area (Area #1).
I Mayor Probst questioned the zero lot line building setback between Parcels A-I and C and stated
his concern that if these parcels were significantly redeveloped, the City would not want to
I guarantee the zero lot line option. Mr. Ringwald advised the lot line being questioned exists as
shown. He explained that if the building on Parcels A-I and C were destroyed and rebuilt, it
I would probably be assumed that the current lot line conditions would again be acceptable, ifthe
buildings were rebuilt as they currently exist. Mayor Probst stated if this were to happen, he
would support requiring the new development to provide building setback adjacent to the
I common lot line. Mr. Ringwald advised this aspect was not discussed with the applicant but if
the building were to be redeveloped, then he believes the owner would request a modification to
the PUD.
I Mayor Probst requested assurances that the action being considered tonight would not prevent
that from happening should the entire site be redeveloped. Mr. Ringwald suggested that if the
I council wishes assurances, then Condition 13 should be added to indicate this intention.
f'
I
DRAFT .
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JULY 8. 1996 8 .
..
Councilmember Malone stated the PUD concept is to develop multiple lots but if it were to
happen that the lots break into separate ownership, there is nothing to dissolve the PUD. He
stated if Parcel C comes under separate ownership, he believes the PUD should become invalid. I
Mr. Ringwald advised the PUD does not relate to specific ownership but, rather, is a legal
document which permanently links the parcels due to access and other needs. I
Mayor Probst noted Parcel C already has separate access to Fernwood Avenue and he wants to
assure his concern is addressed. I
Mr. Seiler reviewed the history of ownership of this site and advised that CDS owns the property
and leases it back; however, the owner of Parcel C has the option to buy the property in the year I
2018.
Councilmember Aplikowski suggested a condition be added that if the building is removed, for I
whatever reason, the zero lot line would not exist and the PUD would dissolve.
Mr. Fritsinger advised that since a PUD is very similar to a SUP in that it is filed with the I
property and runs with the land, a special condition would be required to deal with this aspect.
Jeff Smyser, RLK Associates, Ltd., representing CDS, commented on the differences between ..
the current use and a future PUD use.
Mr. Seiler indicated no objection to the type of condition being suggested by Mayor Probst. I
Bill Franke, 1228 Wynridge Drive, stated he is an abutting property owner. He noted that I
approval of the proposed PUD would be similar to establishing a zoning district and also it
approves the zero lot line as it exists today. He cautioned against consideration whereby
demolition ofthe building would dissolve the PUD since it would also eliminate the certainty of I
what will exist on this property. Mr. Franke noted another consideration is the need to construct
buildings that are financeable and insurable.
Mayor Probst stated while he is not opposed to what exists, he does not want to guarantee the I
zero setback should the entire area be redeveloped.
I
I
I
..
I
!
.' DRAFT
~. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JULY 8. 1996 9
. Councilmember Hicks noted the zero lot line was established by a previous action and he does
I not understand how action under this application impacts that situation. He questioned staff s
recommendation regarding the setbacks from the 100 foot park dedication line on the west side
of the site. Mr. Ringwald explained staffs recommendation is zero to 25 feet is an acceptable
. intrusion into Area 1 and 25 feet to 50 feet, it should first be reviewed by the City. He
commented on the zoning districts in relationship to the property to be dedicated to the City
which is currently zoned Industrial-I. He stated it is not unreasonable to require additional
. setback to assure adequate buffering between single family residential and I-I uses. It was noted
that another PUD amendment could be considered once a solid proposal is submitted which
addresses the City's concern.
I Councilmember Aplikowski asked if the applicant is against the 25 foot restriction. Mr. Seiler
I explained that CDS is interested in dividing and selling this site and wants to retain flexibility to
add a building to the property. He noted that adding a building with a 25,000 square footprint
would necessitate additional parking spaces. Rather than establishing pre-existing conditions,
I CDS wants flexibility to utilize the site up to the 125 foot setback line.
Mr. Ringwald advised the City would be in a better position if the Planning Commission and
Ie staff recommendation is considered which leaves the decision to allow further intrusions into
Area 1 with the City rather than with the developer.
I MOTION: Hicks moved and Malone seconded a motion to approve Planning Case #96-05,
Control Data Systems, PUD Master Planl4201 North Lexington Avenue, based on
the conditions outlined by the Planning Commission and adding Condition #13,
I related to zero lot line if the buildings on Parcels C and A are destroyed, and
Condition #14, resolving the setback line from the park dedication line.
I Counci[member Malone asked if the motion suggests a 25 foot setback line from the 200 foot
mark and a 50 foot setback considered with City review. Councilmember Hicks indicated
I support of a 25 foot setback from the park dedication line.
With regard to the zero lot line, Councilmember Malone suggested the current zero lot line is not
I an independent right of the PUD but would require review as part of any significant PUD
amendment. He stated he cannot support the motion on the floor since it only requires a 25 foot
setback from the park dedication line.
I Mr. Franke provided a detailed explanation of site amenities and expressed his concern with
regard to the applicants requested setback since it would "erase" a great portion of the wooded
I area and is not responsible planning. Mr. Franke noted that staffs recommendation was actually
a compromise and while he agrees with the need for flexibility to support development, he
" believes staffs recommendation does just that.
I
DP A eT 'I
. h.. ~--\r
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JUL Y 8. 1996 10 .1
Mr. Seiler stated his point in suggesting a 125 foot setback is not that a developer would tear I
down the wooded area, but to eliminate restricting a future development. He reviewed current I
restrictions related to parking spaces and the potential that exists where additional parking spaces
would need to be created. He suggested the area of the 25 foot "overlap" could also be used to
provide additional landscaping. Mr. Seiler reiterated that CDS prefers to retain flexibility and I
suggested the actual setback be considered at the time the site plan is submitted for consideration.
Councilmember Malone stated he understands Mr. Seiler's request but expressed concern with I
the need to protect the City's best interest in case the developer is not as sensitive to these issue
as CDS. Mr. Seiler suggested a compromise to consider 25 feet with up to 75 feet under review
(rather than 50 feet). I
Mayor Probst concurred with Councilmember Malone's comments and stated he does not support
the motion on the floor since it does not provide adequate protection of the wooded area and I
setback from the residential area.
Councilmember Hicks withdrew his motion on the floor. He noted that a site plan review will be I
needed with any development and different parking options could be considered, such as a two-
story facility. He explained he also does not support eradicating the wooded area but wants to .-
remain flexible.
MOTION: Malone moved and Aplikowski seconded a motion to approve Planning Case I
#96-05, Control Data Systems, PUD Master PlanlMinor Subdivision, 4201 North
Lexington Avenue, based on the conditions outlined by the Planning Commission
and adding Condition #13, The current zero lot line between Parcels A-I and C is I
not an independent right of the PUD and will require review should there be any
significant PUD amendment; and Condition #14, The developable setback,
measuring from the easterly park dedication line would be 50 feet with City I
review and 75 feet without review.
Mr. Fritsinger questioned the definition of "significant PUD amendment" and suggested I
rewording to "significant site redevelopment". Councilmembers Malone and Aplikowski agreed
to this friendly amendment.
Motion carried unanimously (4-0), I
MOTION: Malone moved and Hicks seconded a motion to endorse and accept the Park I
Dedication Agreement for Planning Case #96-05 per the recommendation of
Parks & Recreation Director Walsh. Motion carried unanimously (4-0). I
..
I
I' DRAFT
~. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JULY 8, 1996 II
I B. Metropolitan Council Growth Options
I Mr. Ringwald explained that the proposed resolution endorses the Association of Metropolitan
Municipalities (AMM) policy on metropolitan gro'wth. He reviewed the growth projections and
I policy presented by the AMM which staff recommends be endorsed.
Councilmember Malone updated the Council regarding AMM's position to not accept the
I Metropolitan Council's desire to restrain growth to current MUSA areas.
Mayor Probst stated he would support a stronger response than the AMM's but will support it as
I presented because he believes it represents the issues and provides a good alternative. He
commented on the negative impact to Arden Hills' infrastructure which is caused by development
beyond the Metro area.
I MOTION: Malone moved and Aplikowski seconded a motion to adopt Resolution #96-46,
Endorsing a Metropolitan Growth Policy and direct staff to forward it to both the
I Metropolitan COLIDcil and AMM. Motion carried unanimously (4-0).
C. Oak Avenue Sanitary Sewer Improvement Project
..
Dwane Stafford, Public Works Supervisor, eXplained that the sanitary sewer lines which lay
I under streets scheduled for reconstruction were televised and it has been determined that the
section under Oak Avenue has ten areas where the pipe has failed, Two of the areas are related
to improper installation of service laterals and the others were probably caused by poor bedding
I in the pipe areas,
Mr. Stafford advised the City Engineer has solicited bids for these repairs and the following two
I were received: Infratech Infrastructure Technologies, Inc. for $13,934, and Buchen
Environmental Services, Inc. for $17,535. He explained they utilize different types of repairs.
Infratech uses a repair link which uses a foam backed stainless steel pipe. Buchen uses a
I seamless tube of polyester yarns which is impregnated with resin. The pipe is inflated and held
while the resins cure and become hard. Mr. Stafford advised the stainless steel repair is less
I costly but the Public Works Department is reluctant to place metal into that type of environment
and supports the resin type of repair since it is thinner and the City is able to continue to use the
same types of cleaning tools. Mr. Stafford showed samples of the two types of pipes and
I explained the differences involved in the maintenance. He advised that staffrecommends
Buchen Environmental Services be hired to conduct the repair using polyester pipes even though
it is more expensive.
I
,.
I
DRAFT 'I
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JULY 8. 1996 12 .1
John Grove, Vice President of Buchen Environmental Services, Inc., advised the curing rate of I
the resin is approximately two hours and the sewer line may need to be temporarily blocked off,
depending on the flow and depth of the sewer. If possible, sewage can be diverted and rerouted I
during that time. He then explained how service laterals are accommodated,
MOTION: Malone moved and Aplikowski seconded a motion to authorize the hiring of I
Buchen Environmental Services, Chaska, Minnesota, to conduct the repairs to the
Oak Avenue sanitary sewer at a cost not to exceed $17,535. The motion carried I
unanimously (4-0).
D. Change Order No.1 for 1996 Street Improvement Project I
Mr. Stafford advised that Pine Tree Drive is one of the streets scheduled for an overlay in the
1996 Street Improvement Plan. However, Ramsey County has indicated there may be a conflict I
at the intersection of Pine Tree Drive and County Road E in that the new overlay will not match
the existing pavement on County Road E or the existing curb at the edge of Pine Tree Drive.
Therefore, it is necessary to mill a portion of the existing bituminous surface to a depth of I
approximately 1 Yz inches. The concern is that the loop detectors which control the semaphores at
this intersection are typically buried only 1 Yz to 2Yz inches in the pavement and milling this area
could damage or completely destroy the existing detectors. ..
Mr. Stafford stated the Public Works Department recommends the Council approve Change I
Order #1 appropriating $7,317.40 for the replacement of the loop detectors, if necessary, and that
the City Engineer be directed to take all precautions possible to protect and save the existing loop
detectors, thereby saving any repair or replacement costs. I
MOTION: Hicks moved and Malone seconded a motion to approve Change Order No. 1 in
the amount of $7,317.40 for the 1996 Street Improvement Project, as presented. I
The motion carried unanimously (4-0).
ADMINISTRATOR COMMENTS I
Mr. Fritsinger advised staff has mailed the RFQ for City Hall professional services to about 25
firms and due to the delay in preparation, extended the time period for submittal by one I
additional week.
I
I
..
I
!
I' .
DRAFT
~e ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JULY 8. 1996 13
I COUNCIL COMMENTS
I Councilmember Hicks commented on the improvement to County Road F.
I Councilmember Hicks reported he will be unable to attend the next meeting of the Northwest
Youth and Family Services Board Meeting. Councilmember Aplikowski indicated she will
attend.
I Mayor Probst advised regarding the receipt of a request from the League of Minnesota Cities to
increase Arden Hill's dues payments by $698 to help cover the cost of legal action on right-of-
I way activities. Mr. Fritsinger stated copies will be in the agenda packet for discussion on July
29,1996.
I ADJOURN
MOTION: Hicks moved and Aplikowski seconded a motion to adjourn the meeting at
I 9:25 p.m. The motion carried unanimously (4-0).
Ie
Dennis Probst Brian Fritsinger
I Mayor City Administrator
I NOTICE OF MEETINGS
A special City Council meeting will be held July IS, 1996, at 7:30 p.m. at Shoreview
I Community Center and the next regular City Council meeting will be held July 29, 1996, at
7:30 p.m. at New Brighton City Hall.
I
I
I
~
I
I' .,
DR4Fr
I MINUTES
~ CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA
WORKSESSION
JULY 15, 1996
4:30 P.M. - SHOREVIEW COMMUNITY CENTER
I CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
Pursuant to due call and notice'thereof, Acting Mayor Beverly Aplikowski called to order the
I City Council worksession at 4:55 pm. Present: Councilmembers Beverly Aplikowski, Dale
Hicks and Paul Malone; City Administrator, Brian Fritsinger; Public Works Superintendent,
Dwayne Stafford; Community Development Director, Kevin Ringwald; Parks and Recreation
I Direction, Cindy Walsh; City Accountant, Terry Post, and Consulting Engineer, Greg
Stonehouse. Mayor Dennis Probst arrived at 5:00 pm and Councilmember Susan Keirn arrived
at 5:05 p.m.
I City Issues - Short Term
I a. 1997 Budget
Staff reviewed the basic assumptions of the proposed 1997 budget and requested affirmation
I of these points. These included a levy increase of 0-3%, capital items and salary costs.
The Council concurred that these assumptions were correct, and Staff should proceed with
.. development of the 1997 preliminary budget on this basis.
Mayor Probst indicated he will be unavailable to attend the July 29, 1996, Council meeting
I and August 19, 1996 worksession meeting. Councilmember Malone will be unavailable for
the August 12, 1996 Council meeting. Staff was directed to schedule a worksession meeting
for August 12, 1996, at 6:30 pm to review the preliminary budget.
I b. 1996 Street Imorovements - Review Process
I Mr. Fritsinger and Mr. Stonehouse reviewed the process followed in 1996 as part ofthe
1996 Pavement Management Program (PMP). Mayor Probst commented that the 1996
process was an improvement over 1995 but minor adjustments should be considered. No
I significant problems were identified as part of the 1996 process.
City Issues - Lon!! Term
I a. 1997 Street Imorovement Process
The Council considered several minor changes to the street improvement process. These
I were primarily related to the notification and meeting process. Council encouraged a
change from using alternate streets to a three (3) to five (5) year plan where residents could
receive advance notice of projects. The Council also requested the preparation of a list of all
I city streets with a schedule of all work which has been completed historically by street.
f'
I
I
DRAFT .. 'I
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION - JULY IS. 1996 2 I
b. Assessment Policy ..
Staff presented a brief report summarizing a variety of issues which have been raised by I
residents regarding the Assessment Policy.
Councilmember Aplikowski questioned whether the percentage paid should change from the I
current 50/50 split.
Mayor Probst indicated the policy uses sound reason and is a fair policy and questioned why I
we should change it or the process. The assessment approach is fair, and the policy works.
He did agree that corner lots have been a problem.
Councilmember Hicks stated the reconsideration of the per unit vs. front footage approach I
may be appropriate.
Councilmember Malone concurred with Mayor Probst that the policy works. A change to I
unit assessments may be problematic but a mixed formula may work. The hearing dates
were scheduled to allow for resident input and making decisions on the project proceeding I
prior to work beginning. Interest rates are controlled by State Statute.
Councilmember Keim discussed her observations with respect to corner lot valuations. She ell
suggested that Council should consider a review of this portion of the Assessment Policy.
Council directed Staffto revisit the corner lot method and evaluate the per unit vs. front I
footage approach. Any recommended changes should simplify and not complicate the
existing policy. I
c. Newsletter
The Council reviewed the proposed newsletter prepared by the Newsletter Task Force. The I
Council elected to use the name "Arden Hills Notes" and asked for some review and
language clarification on the topics included. Staff was directed to be sure that the articles
or notes make sense to residents who may not have an historical perspective. Council I
authorized proceeding with publication in August.
Shoreview Joint Council Meetin!! I
a. Lexington Avenue RestriDing I
Dan Solar, Ramsey County Engineer, made a presentation to the Arden Hills and Shoreview
City Councils in regard to proposed striping changes to Lexington Avenue. This area of
road south of Highway 96 was rebuilt in 1984 and was initally striped for four lanes. After I
complaints, it was reduced to three lanes.
..
I
I' -. DRAFT
~~ ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION - JULY 15. 1996 3
I The County sees several options for this area including widening, restriping for four lanes
and a combination where left turn lanes could be added near roads. This portion of the road
I will be partially rebuilt as part of the Highway 96 reconstruction
I The Councils agreed that Ramsy County should hold an information meeting for residents
and a joint letter from the Mayors should be the invitation. This setting would allow the
County to present their recommendations and receive a response from citizens. The project
I would be scheduled for completion in 1997.
b. Joint Hockev Arena
I The Councils briefly reviewed the status of the Quad Ice Arena proposed in Blaine. A
number of issues were discussed including the lack of confidence in the financial proformas;
demographics of current and future participants; philosophy/political need for project; the
I location offacility; school involvement; Bethel College involvement; pending federal
legislation; proximity to other rinks; MASC agenda; Ramsey County activities and contract
language.
I The Councils will be expected to take formal action on this project in August. Staff will
continue to work with all parties on agreements and methods to reduce risk to participating
Ie cities.
I Roundtable Discussion
a. Committee Reports
I The Council reviewed the activities of the various committees. Staff should begin
considering options in regards to a new fire contract and begin preliminary discussions with
the Lake Johanna Volunteer Fire Department (LJVFD).
I The Council discussed the merits of additional discussion with committees to assist with the
focus of the committees.
I b. Department Head Reports
Mr. Ringwald commented on the Welsh Company proposal and letters. Mayor Probst
I expressed concern about the tone of the letter received from Welsh.
I Mr. Stafford, Ms. Walsh, Mr. Post, and Mr. Ringwald briefly reviewed other departmental
activities.
~ The meeting was adjourned at 8:05 pm.
I
J " '"
I DRAFT
I~ MINUTES
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA
SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING
I JULY 15, 1996
7:30 P.M.- SHOREVIEW COMMUNITY CENTER
I
I CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
I Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Dennis Probst called to order the Special
City Council meeting at 7:35 p.m.
I Present: Councilmembers Beverly Aplikowski, Dale Hicks, Paul Malone, and Susan
Keirn. Mayor Dennis Probst.
I Also present were: City Administrator, Brian Fritsinger; City Accountant, Terry Post; and
Public Works Superintendent, Dwayne Stafford.
-. AGENDA ADOPTION
I MOTION: Malone moved and Keirn seconded a motion to adopt the agenda for the
July 15, 1996, Special City Council meeting as presented. The motion carried
I unanimously (5-0).
I CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Walter Dunnett Reimbursement
I MOTION: Malone moved and Keim seconded a motion to approve the Consent Calendar as
presented, and authorize execution of all necessary documents contained therein.
I The motion carried unanimously (5-0).
-
I
.e
I
-----
DRAFT '" - -I
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JULY 15. 1996 2 I
-.
UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS
A. Resolution #96-44, Award Bids for Watermain Improvement Project of 1996 I
Dwayne Stafford, Public Works Superintendent, advised that bids for the Old Highway 10, I
Watermain Improvement Project were received within the past week. The low bid was
submitted by Bonine Excavating, Inc. at a cost of$139,972.50. With the late bid and short
construction period, this bid was approximately $40,000 higher than the engineer's estimate. I
Mr. Stafford referred to the July 12, 1996 memorandum from City Engineer Stonehouse
concerning the bid results and options available to the City. I
Discussion ensued regarding the bid results, impacts of delaying the northerly and southerly
portions of the project, rationale for proceeding, impact on proposed assessments, and staff .
capabilities and cost expectations for completing the southerly portion as a City repair project.
Mayor Probst stated he had difficulty in supporting a bid award because of the bid range and the I
low bid being significantly above the earlier engineering estimate.
MOTION: Malone moved and Hicks seconded a motion to reject all bids and directed the ..
Public Works Superintendent to complete the Old Highway 10 Watermain
Improvement Maintenance Project from County Road F to Valentine Avenue. I
The motion carried unanimously (5-0).
Staff was directed to notify all affected Old Highway 10 residents of the correlation of the .
northerly section watermain installation project because of this action.
I
I
I
I
I
-I
I
.. ~ '.'^ DRAFT
I ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JULY 15. 1996 3
Ie
B. Gene Schmidt, 1628 McCracken Lane, Assessment Discussion
I Mr. Fritsinger reviewed the recent request from Mr. Schmidt for reconsideration of his
assessment and the points outlined in the staff report clarifying the use of the current assessment
I policy. The City attorney has recommended that the assessment is based on the policy and
procedurally was done correct. Staff recommends Council reiterate its support of its previous
action to deny the appeal.
I Councilmember Hicks commented that Mr. Schmidt raises some good questions, but believes the
fair thing for all involved is to follow the policy. If the City doesn't follow its policy, other
I residents would expect similar treatment.
Mayor Probst spoke against the motion. Corner lots are difficult to deal with and the City did
I grant a reduction at the corner lot across the street (1624 Chatham) due to an easement which
reduced the developability ofthe lot. Mayor Probst indicated that Mr. Hick's motion is
I consistent with the policy, however, he stated there should be room for some logic and
accommodation.
Ie Councilmember Keirn questioned whether there was a curb adjacent to Mr. Schmidt's property.
Mayor Probst responded affirmatively.
I Councilmember Hicks commented on the drainage patterns in the area, and the only argument
that could be considered for reducing the assessment would be the lack of change to the property.
I Councilmember Aplikowski indicated that this was a difficult issue for her, but the policy is clear
and, as such, until the policy were changed, she couldn't agree to reduction.
I MOTION: Hicks moved and Aplikowski seconded a motion to deny the request for
reconsideration on the assessment appeal. The motion carried (3-2). Mayor
Probst and Councilmember Keirn opposed.
I ADMINISTRATOR COMMENTS
I Mr. Fritsinger reviewed his response in regards to pond maintenance. Councilmember Malone
reviewed the history of the neighbors requesting the previous property owner maintain the site.
I Councilmember Hicks commented his support for the recommendation of the administrator and
the remainder of the Council concurred
I Mr. Fritsinger indicated he is receiving a great deal of response to the RFQ for architectural
services. He requested clarification on the role of Mayor Probst in the selection process should
BRW/Ellness submit. While there is not a legal conflict of interest, questions have been raised
.- by respondents to the role of Mr. Probst.
I
DRAFT I
I
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - JULY 15. 1996 4 -.
Mayor Probst commented that he has discussed this issue with several of the respondents, and he
intends to abstain from voting and discussions on the selection of the architect. I
Councilmember Hicks was concerned about Mayor Probst abstaining from discussions because
of his valuable expertise and knowledge of this field. .
Mr. Fritsinger indicated he has begun discussions with Decisions Resources Incorporated (DRI)
on the proposed Community Survey. I
COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilmember Aplikowski reviewed the recent activities as part of Land O'Lakes 75th I
anmversary. I
Mayor Probst noted that he was quite disappointed with the response from Welsh Company in
regards to proposed Gateway Development and anticipated an appropriate staff response. I
ADJOURN
MOTION: Malone moved and Hicks seconded a motion to adjourn the meeting at 8:45 p.m. .-
The motion carried unanimously (5-0).
.
Dennis Probst Brian Fritsinger I
Mayor City Administrator
NOTICE OF MEETINGS I
The next regularly scheduled City Council meeting will be held July 29, 1996, at 7:30 p.m. at I
New Brighton City Hall.
.
.
I
-I
I
~ ~ .
.
I CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
~ MEMORANDUM
I DATE: July 29, 1996
TO: Mayor and City Council
I ' ~.~
FROM: Brian Fritsinger, City Administrator lrr-t fi!!!)
I SUBJECT: Administrator Comments for July 29, 1996 City Council Meeting
I 4. Consent Calendar
Newsletter Committee Creation and AI)Dointments to Citize
a.
I The Council is asked to oppose the creation of a Citizen Newsletter Committee.
The Council has previously informally discussed this item at previous Council
Worksessions. The mission and scope of this committee may evolve at a future
I date to include other communication options, including Cable television and the
Internet. An updated list of the individuals willing to serve on the Newsletter
Committee will be a bench handout at the meeting.
.. b. LMC Public Ri!!hts-of-Wav Fundin!! Reouest
The Council is asked to consider a funding request from the League of Minnesota
I Cities (LMC) in the amount of $698.00. This financial assistance would be used
to address the US West court challenge oflocal management of the public rights-
of-way.
I c. Claims and Payroll
I The Council is asked to approve the two July payrolls (No. 14 & No. 15) for the
periods from June 22,1996 to July 19, 1996, and payable claims in the amount of
$226,858.56.
I Council may note payments to the City of Roseville in the amount of
$127,129.451 for second quarter water purchases and payments totaling $425.00
I to Ramsey County deputies for extended patrol at Mounds View High School
during the close of the school year.
I 6. Unfinished and New Business
a. PerrY Park Final Pay Estimate (No.5)
I The Council is asked to approve the final pay estimate to Veit & Company Inc., in
the amount of $27,205.05. This action would release all retainage currently being
. withheld. The City Engineer believes that adequate safeguards exist through the
use of the contractor's warrantee bond to resolve any irrigation system
performance issues.
I
. ~ ..
.
Administrator Comments for July 29, 1996 City Council Meeting I
Page 2 ..
July 29,1996
b. Karth Lake RavineILake Josephine Outlet Final Pav Estimate I
The Council is asked to approve the final pay estimate to Jay Brothers, Inc.
(payment to Northern Escrow, Inc.),in the amount of $20,089.00. This action I
would release all retainage currently being withheld. City Engineer Stonehouse
has indicated that staff identified final punch list items have been completed for
the Karth Lake portion of the project. I
c. 1996 Street Improvements Pav Estimate No.1
The Council is asked to approve pay estimate number one to T.A. Schifsky & I
Sons, Inc., in the amount of $26,488.35. This amount is net of a ten percent
retainage holdback of $2,943 .15. The pay estimate is for the period from June 17, I
1996 to July I, 1996 and represents approximately seven percent completion of
the total project ($379,973.43).
d. 1996 Trail Improvement Chanl!e Order I
The Council is asked to approve Change Order number one in the amount of
$39,656.00 to Thor Construction, Inc. for construction of the Northern Trail ~
segment. Council may recall an earlier related action with the adoption of
Resolution #94-43 on June 24, 1996, which approved a Cooperative DNR Trails
Grant for this trail segment. I
e. Planninl! Case #95-23. Buetow Final Plat Extension
Council is asked to re-approve the final Registered Land Survey in Planning Case I
#95-23 subject to the original four conditions of approval in the matter of the
Buetow Minor Subdivision.
f. Planning Case #95-16. Balfany Preliminary Plat I
Council is asked to consider approval of a five lot single family preliminary plat .
(Oakridge). The Planning Commission recommends approval of this case
including right-of-way width and cul-de-sac diameter variances subject to four
conditions. I
Planning Case #96-08. Albierg Minor Subdivision
g.
Council is asked to consider approval of a preliminary Minor Subdivision (land I
swap) for a parcel at 1680 Oak A venue. The Planning Commission recommends
approval of this case subject to the access easements recording and release ofthe
existing access easement. I
-.
I
I~ - .
:. Administrator Comments for July 29, 1996 City Council Meeting
Page 3
July 29, 1996
I h. Planning: Case #96-11. Welsh Administrative Appeal
Council is asked to consider accepting or denying the applicant appeal in the
matter of an administrative order to modifY an existing fence at 1509 Colleen
I A venue. The Planning Commission recommends approval of this case based
upon unusual circumstances.
I 10. Executive Closed Session
a. Discuss pending litigation in the matter of the Special Assessment appeal ofMr.
Gene Schmidt.
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
1<' ...
I CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
I. MEMORANDUM
DATE: July 29, 1996
I TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Brian Fritsinger, City Administrator
I SUBJECT: LMC Request Regarding Public ROW
I BACKGROUND
I Attached the council will find a request from the League of Minnesota Cities for Financial
Assistance to address the US West challenge to local management of the public rights of way.
I The League is requesting a minimum payment of $698.00.
The attached information sheet describes the right-of-way issue and the Leagues proposed
I approach to addressing the US West challenge.
.... RECOMMENDA nON
The Council is asked to consider the request for financial assistance in the amount of $698.00.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
....
--.~
I
,- .. . 'I
I
Policy adopted by Right of Way Issues Task Force, June 6,1996 ..
RIGHT-OF-WAY ISSUES
Use of Public Rifthts-of-Wav I
J. The responsibility for managing and protecting public rights-ol-way must remain I
with cities and other units of government entrusted with protecting the health, safety
and convenience of the community. I
2. Construction and safety standards are of paramount interest to cities, and consistent
with respective industries' desire for uniformity, should be developed by the municipal I
engineering community for adoption by cities to ensure effective right-of-way management.
3. Cities and other governmental units responsible for the protection and management I
of public rights-ol-way should be authorized to require reasonable compensation which
reflects the policy andfiscal objectives of their community.
4. The courts should remain the primary forum for resolution of allegations that communities .
have exercised their authority in an unreasonable, arbitrary or capricious manner.
Backs;round -
Demand for all types of uses of rights-of-way, both surface and sub-surface, is increasing .
exponentially, forcing consideration by cities of how best to allocate this very limited resource.
Because public rights-of-way have been acquired at public expense through local property tax
sources or other local action, cities have traditionally had the fundamental responsibility and I
attendant liability for facilitating the safety and convenience of all right-of-way users. Right-of-
way management responsibilities are complex, numerous and site specific, as are the particular I
interests of cities in establishing a value for private use of public space in local rights-of-way.
These factors underscore the fact that rational and expeditious decisions can only be made at the
local level. I
Cities support existing federal non-discrimination requirements that local administration not
impose unreasonable delays or burdens on access, entry or other reasonable use of the right-of-
way. Cities should be authorized, as provided in federal law, to require telecommunications .
providers to meet local requirements for public, educational and government access to their
networks as well as financial and technical support for such access.
The federal government has been auctioning the limited number of public radio frequencies, .
which effectively illustrates the value of that asset to competitive service providers in an
unregulated marketplace. Unlike other businesses which pay for the use of public rights-of-way,
telephone companies currently pay property taxes only on a fraction of their facilities located in I
public rights-of-way and nothing for the value of the right to use them.
.... -
.....--
.
_n_
." . ,
, LMC 145 University Avenue West, St. Paul, HN 55103-2044
.
I LfilQ.guO of Minnesota Cities phone: (612) 281-1200 . (800) 925-1122
, Cities promot;~9 e:<<:ellence fax: (612) 281-1299" TDD (612) 281-1290
. July 2, 1996
. Dear Mayor Probst and Members of the Arden Hills City Council;
By now, you are probably aware of the rights of way issue facing cities in Minnesota. US
. West's challenge to local management of the public rights of way is one of the most critical
issues cities have faced in years. It was a topic of considerable discussion at the Annual
L Conference, where member cities supported the League Board of Directors decision to move
forward with an aggressive work program and financing plan to counter this challenge. We need
your city to make a special payment to this fund and help put the work plan into action.
I The work plan developed by the Rights of Way Task Force and approved by the Board could
cost $325,000 or more. This assumes that a large portion of the work plan will be coordinated
by and implemented through League staff. The Board has agreed to allocate $125,000 from the
current League budget for the work plan and is asking member cities to voluntarily pay
$200,000.
, Based on your city's 1995-96 League dues, your suggested minimum payment is $698.
c,
~, rc Please consider this request in July and submit your payment by August 15, 1996 if at all
possible. If each city meets their minimum payment, the $200,000 target is reachable. However,
because it is unlikely that all cities will join this voluntary effort, we encourage members to
allocate more if this initiative is of particular importance to them,
Two important points should be made: First, this is a voluntary payment. As a member of the
League of Minnesota Cities, you are not required to take part in this effort. However, iftotal city
payments fall significantly short of the $200,000 goal, the League will not be able to fully
undertake the work plan. Second, your voluntary payment should not be confused with your
League membership dues which will be billed at the beginning of September.
The Board of Directors and I understand that this issue must be weighed against the priorities in
your city. However, we believe that the prospect of losing local control of public property
warrants this extraordinary effort. This is a complicated issue, please consider it carefully.
Enclosed is a brief information sheet to help you in your deliberations. If you have any
questions, contact me at (218) 643-1431, League Executive Director Jim Miller at (612) 280-
~ 1205 or (800) 925-1122, or any member of the Board of Directors.
u Sincerely,
a ~r:d# r~.~, f".~'
:gu16 i'it:,
ft - for t Blaine C. Hill
Ill, '" PI! "I"
'.. \.I~, \.,.)
President, League of Minnesota Cities
n:'
'-.I;"! u,
cc: City Manager, AdIDJqlam.tel(fptp(;kr&I'mY/AFFIRI\1ATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER
"-."._ ",) 1.-:-:"
, ~ "
1
QSo what is the League of Minnesota Q What if our city decides not to pay? ,
Cities doing? I
AAS the magnitude of this issue became ..Alhat's your choice. As a member of the
clear, the League Board of Directors eague of Minnesota Cities, you are not
appointed a Rights of Way Task Force to look at required to take part in this effort. However, if .
what should be done. Through the course of total city payments fall significantly short of the
several meetings, the Task Force developed a $200,000 goal, the League will not be able to
work program that involves legal, legislative, fully undertake the work plan. .
and public information strategies to protect
cities' role in managing the public right of way. I
The Task Force estimates that full Qcan our city pay more?
implementation of the work program could cost , l
as much as $325,000. The Board has agreed to A Certainly. In fact, we encourage members
finance this work program by allocating to allocate more to this fund if this initiative
$125,000 from the current League budget and is of particular importance to them. If all -
-
asking member cities to voluntarily allocate member cities meet their minimum payment, the
$200,000, $200,000 target is reachable - but it's unlikely
that every city will join this voluntary effort.
Q$200,OOO is a lot of money. What is the
League going to do with all of that? QAfter we pay, how can we stay up to date
.A:;'he work plan includes legal on the issue? -
epresentation, work with legislative A We will keep you informed of any
leaders, and an extensive statewide public developments through articles in Cities .~
information campaign. While League staff will Bulletin, direct mailings. and broadcast faxes.
take on the bulk of this work, it's likely that
outside assistance will be needed.
Q Clearly, our payment is only part of the
solution, What else can we do?
QHOW did you decide how much you want .AJhe best thing city officials can do is stay
our city to pay? . nformed, and pass that information along to
.A: our suggested payment is based on a as many others as possible. Discuss rights of
ercentage of your city's 1995-96 League way with your local editors and reporters; make
dues. local control a campaign issue for your House
and Senate candidates; talk to your local
Chamber of Commerce about the business
QDO we have to pay? How will the payment impact oftom-up streets; let taxpayers know
affect our dues? you're working to protect their investment in
ANa city if required to pay. This is strictly a streets.
voluntary payment. Also, it's entirely
separate from the League dues statement your QI'm still confused. Who should I call?
city will receive in September.
.Nf,you have more questions, please contact
eague Executive Director Jim Miller at
(612) 280-1205 or (800) 925-1122, or any
member ofthe Board of Directors.
I"" "
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS PAGE1OF3
I ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CLAIMS REPORT
TO BE APPROVED AT THE 07/29/96 COUNCIL MEETING
Ie
CLAIMS PAID SINCE LAST COUNCIL MEETING (07/08/96)
I lai#la;l)AtElwlIlDOR ,,',',',',', ':',.j,AMOuN'I\1 COMMEN'lS':' """""""1
I I
10619 07/12/96 Public Emplovees Retirement Association 2,171.14 First July Pavroll
I 10620 07/12/96 ICMA Retirement Trust - 457 1,477.92 First July Payroll
10621 07112/96 State Cauitol Credit Union 2,747.77 First July Payroll
10622 07/12/96 Government Finance Officers Assn. 280.00 Seminar, 08/12 - Post
10623 07/12/96 US West Communications 826.73 Current Invoices
I 10624 07/12/96 Gall al!her's Service, Inc. 315.33 June Service Perrv Park & Public Works
10625 07/12/96 Knox Lumber Company 39.21 Water & Sewer Maintenance Supplies
10626 07/12/96 Northern States Power Company 1,657.01 Current Invoices
10627 Check Voided --
I 10628 07/12/96 Resistance Technoloi!V~ Inc. 1,483.20 Sales Tax Refund for Exempt Water Purchased
10629 07/12/96 Posta2e by Phone Svstem 400.00 Office Posta2e
10630 07/12/96 Frattallone's Hardware. Inc. 84.03 June Purchases - W/Discount, Public Works
I 10631 07112196 DCA, Inc. 81.78 Medical Reimbursement PIR #14
10632 07/15196 Cemstone Products Company 632.38 Cement - W{Discount, PerrY Park
10633 07/15196 AT&T - Kansas City 21.43 Current Invoices Lon2 Distance
10634 07/15196 Home Depot 79.26 Paint and Stain Parks
I 10635 07/15196 Indenendent Snorts Network 2,142.00 Softball Umpires 06/%
10636 07/18/96 Pulstar Distributin2, Inc. 34.09 Vehicle #2 - Mobile Antenna
10637 07/18/96 Postmaster, St. Paul 746.05 Posta~e - 2Q96 Utility Bills
10638 07/19196 Minnesota Zoo 60.00 Summer PlaY2round Trip 07/19
10639 07/26/96 Public Employees Retirement Association 2,136.08 Second July Pavroll
10640 07126/96 ICMA Retirement Trust - 457 1,121.92 Second July Payroll
10641 07126/96 State Capitol Credit Union 2.803.95 Second July Payroll
10642 07/26/96 Int'I Union of Operatin2 Ellltineers 175.00 July Payrolls
I 10643 Check Voided
10644 07126/96 United Way of the St. Paul Area 26.00 July Payrolls
10645 07126/96 Public Emnloyees Ret. Assn. (lns.) 48.00 July Pavrolls, AUl!llst Insurance
I 10646 07/20196 MN Department of Revenue 2,086.00 Sales Tax Remittance 2Q96
10647 07126/96 Nancy Rockwood 50.00 Penny Carniyal - Clown
10648 07126/96 Midwest Asnhalt Corooration 35.12 Road Materials WjDiscount
I I
I II Subtotal Paid Claims 23.761.401
I Paid Claims From Aboye - 23,761.40
Add Unpaid Claims, Page 3 of 3 203.097.16
I Total Aecounts Payable Claims
for Council Approval, 07/29 226 858.56
I
Note: Checks for unpaid claims totaling $64,195.32, were issued
I on July 9th, 19% after approyal at the July 8th, 1996
Council Meeting. They were check numbers 10554-10618.
This sequence corresponds to unpaid temporary numbers
. TI-T65. Check numbers 10552-10553 were used for c""'""
alignment. _87m
-.
I
-~
I' .
CITY OF ARDEN HIlLS PAGE20F3
I ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CLAIMS REPORT
, TO BE APPROVED AT 07/29/96 COUNCIL MEETING
Ie
I UNPAID CLAIMS REGISTER:
11IlMP#I..CIi.\i:iAlIll....'~R "",:"I,)AMOl.lI'Il\I, COMMllN'IS, ' >1
I I
I TOOl 07/?IJ/96 A-I Hvdraulic Sales & Service 43.53 Vehicle #50 Renair Parts
T002 07/?IJ/96 Abdo, Abdo & Eick 185.00 Renort Office of the State Auditor
T003 07/?IJ/96 Accurate Enllravini!, Inc. 7.44 Sil!Ils - Garden Volunteers
T004 07/?IJ/96 Advanta.e Paper 491.31 Various Buildin. Sunnlies
I T005 07/?IJ/96 Chris Allen 64.00 Refund - Tennis (2)
T006 07/?IJ/96 American Medical Security 308.00 Dental Insurance - AUQUst
T007 07/?IJ/96 Aniamal Control Services, Inc. 134.50 00./ Cat Enforce., 06/20 - Middle of Julv
T008 07/?IJ/96 Beisswenller's How-To Store 140.00 June Purchases - Parks & Public Works
I TOlD 07/?IJ/96 Brvan Rock Products, Inc. 315.14 A., Lime, Perrv Park & Roval Hills Park
TOll 07/?IJ/96 Colleen Carl 32.00 Refund - Tennis
T012 07/?IJ/96 Carlson Equipment Company 1.912.72 Backhoe Bucket and Accessories
I T013 07/?IJ/96 Conv Dunl icating Products, Inc. 181.39 Toner for Conicr
T014 07/?IJ/96 Delta Environmental Consultants, Inc. 25.00 Professional Services, Kern Millin. Phase I
T015 07/?IJ/96 E Z Recvclin., Inc. 4,714.00 Julv Service
T016 07/?IJ/96 ESCH Construction Sunnlv 433.99 Concrete and Hi--.;j! Speed Saw Blades
I T017 07/?IJ/96 First Trust 70.06 Bank Service Char.e lQ96
T018 07/?IJ/96 Gonher State One- Call, Inc. 128.00 June Service
T019 07/?IJ/96 GTA, Inc. Good Time Attractions 41.80 Summer PlavoTound SunnJies
T020 07/?IJ/96 DOTi Hart 50.00 RCS Duty, Mounds View High School
(Last Ten School Davs)
T021 07/?IJ/96 Susan Harvev 32.00 Refund Tennis
T022 07/?IJ/96 Hillh Point Creative 175.50 PerrY Park Material Phase II
I T023 07/?IJ/96 Hvdro Supply Company 1,299.30 Two 3" Hvdrant Meters
T024 07/?IJ/96 Independent School District #621 345.75 Bldg. Supervisor, Valentine Hills, Jan. June
131.63 BId.. Supervisor, Island Lake, Jan.-June
T025 07/?IJ/96 Ken Jackson 30.00 Refund Soccer
I T026 07/?IJ/96 David W. Kriesel, Inc. 6,600.00 Inso. & Code Enforcement, 06/17-07/19
T027 07/?IJ/96 Labor Relations Associates, Inc. 1,058.00 Professional Services, June
T028 07/?IJ/96 Joe Lonez 75.00 ReS Dutv, Mounds View Hillh School
T029 07/?IJ/96 LTG Power Equipment 352.01 Vehicles #49 and #42 Renair Parts
I T030 07/?IJ/96 Maier Stewart & Associates 23,204.41 Professional Services, OS/26 06/29
T031 07/?IJ/96 Manle Island Grouo, Inc. 207.38 Install Power SUDclv - Computers
T032 07f?IJ/96 McDonald Batterv Comnanv 89.46 Vehicles #42 and #45 Batteries
T033 O7/?IJ/96 Medica 2,177.99 Health Insurance Au,,"st
I T034 07/?IJ/96 MetroDolitan Council, Wastewater Services 14,256.00 Sac Remittance - June
T035 07/?IJ/96 Minnesota GFOA 160.00 Annual Conference, 10/02-10/04, Post
T036 07/?IJ/96 Minnesota State Treasurer 3.053.81 Buildin,,:Surch aT.e Report - 2Q96
I T037 07/?IJ/96 Minnesota Sun Publications 156.80 Ad - Recentionist
T038 07/?IJ/96 Modem Fence & Construction, Inc. 1,500.00 Removed Fencing Perrv
T039 07/?IJ/96 Morton Salt 779.70 Road Materials
T040 07/?IJ/96 Northern States Power Comoanv 130.04 Current Invoices
I T041 07/?IJ/96 Kevin Otto 50.00 RCS DutV, Mounds View Hillh School
T042 07/?IJ/96 Oxv.en Service Company, Inc. 23.76 Comnressed OYv.en and Safety Glasses
T043 07/?IJ/96 Peterson, Fram & Bergman, P.A. 1,964.80 Legal Services June
2,679.70 Prosecution Fees - June
I T044 07/?IJ/96 Ma~ Shaun Petri 12.00 Refund Fridav Plavoround Event 12\
1 Total, PaRe 2 of 3 Carried Forward - 69,822.921
. c""""
I
." ,
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS PAGE30F3
. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CLAIMS REPORT
, TO BE APPROVED AT 01129/96 COUNCIL MEETING
I e
. UNPAID CLAIMS REGISTER (CONT.):
11!UlW'i',.I.ClI::/t\A11l.I<..\$.NI:lOR. , .1A.M.Otll'iTlCOMMIlNTS' , <:':1
1 I
I T045 07/?fJ/96 Ron Petrusson 25.00 RCS Dutv, Mounds View Hi.h School
T046 07/?fJ/96 Peiiv Cash 113.64 Reolenishment of Funds
T047 07/?fJ/96 Pitnev-Bowes 56.42 Tape Strips for Postage Machine
T048 07/?fJ/96 Terrance R. Post 56.95 Reimb. - Milea.e & MGFOA Meetin.
I T049 07/?fJ/96 Joe Ptasek 25.00 RCS Dutv, Mounds View High School
1'050 07/?fJ/96 Radisson Arrowwood 174.66 Annual MGFOA Conference - Post
T051 07/?fJ/96 Ramsev Countv 989.97 Diesel Fuel and Unleaded Gas - June
1'052 07!?fJ/96 City of Roseville 127,129.41 Water Purchased 2Q96 - 98 Million Gallons
I T053 07/?fJ/96 Ryder Student Transportation 95.00 Saints North - 06128
110.00 Minnesota Zoo - 07/19
1'054 07/?fJ/96 Safetv- Kleen Cornoration 93.72 Servicino of Shan Machines
I T055 07/?fJ/96 Marlo Schultz 25.00 RCS Dutv, Mounds View High School
T056 07!?fJ/96 Sereo Laboratories 638.00 Water Tests - June and Julv
T057 07/?fJ/96 ShielV COnlnanv 20.15 Various Suoolies SWM
T058 07/?fJ/96 Southam Business Communications 170.10 Three Ads for Bids - Highwav 10 Watermain
I T059 07/?fJ/96 SI. Paul Book & StationerY 318.33 Office Sunnlies - Inc. Labels. Laser Printer
1'060 07/?fJ/96 St. Paul Pioneer Press 90.44 Ad - Recentionist
T061 07/?fJ/96 Star Tribune 329.00 Ad - Administrative Secretarv
1'062 07/?fJ/96 Ta~t Stores 79.80 Summer Plavoround Suoolies
T063 07/?fJ/96 Timesaver Off Site Secretarial 187.25 Planning Commission - 07/02
163.50 Council Meetin. - 07/OB
TOM 07/?fJ/96 Top Temporary 831.50 Week Ending 06/?fJ - (Receptionist and
553.80 Week Ending 07/07 Administrative
I 762.60 Week Endin. 07/14 Secretary)
T065 07/?fJ/96 Barrv Vauahan 150.00 RCS Dutv, Mounds View High School
1'066 07/?fJ/96 Water EnQ'ineerinl1 & Management 60.00 Three Year Suhscriotion
I T067 07 ?fJ'96 Ga;:;;- Wil zbacher 25.00 RCS Dutv Mounds View Hiah School
I I
II Subtotal, Pa.e 3 of 3 - -- 133,274.2411
II Paoe 2 of 3 Brouoht Forward - -- 69,822.9211
I I Total Unpaid Claims --- 203.091.161
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I 0 0 jll~11 ~ 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 ~
~ 000 1:'-0 00<'100,,",
_ I cicici ~ci dd~dd~
la:, I .
-.. ~' a,,$
^ .-,' ol I:l 0::
1.1.. OIl .. "d
- ~ 8 ~ =g
'" E i ..
I ;::;~;g S~:;;*;;:;: ~~:;::gg :b:!~:glllit ~~:;:;g~ ].~lt
~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ = ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~
i~":":} '"' ';l 5:. ~ ~~2~~ ~""<t;;;"=:""<t [g.t;li
CO ~ .... ...... l":l., <"'l N ::: 8. ':;J
0) ,,,," ~ 01 II) ..,
I ~ . ~ aA~
C\I , .9 = ~
,.... ,,' i:. I-< ..
-.. Ii ._;:l .~ .9
r-.. Q .0 - B.g e :;
o PO,' e e: '" VJ:, M '0 ~
~ i=i! C I:l 0 o:l.,~
I Q W g~.~, .9 ,9.~ < * ~~~
-...... ~. ;: - ... y ~ 0 . _
I-UJ S.-, e -~ ~ I ::> ~ O~ ~ ~ * ~ ~ i .g
rio'\ >......:'3.... ~ -o'P'"l ll.o..O::
< "'" ;: .... U .~ ~ 01,) [;,os 0 IN IN\ '" ..... E
Q 0 II) '.<<G Q,) IJ .~ ... - ~ .... ~- ;..
C ~ u ~ -= :.~ U ~ E= ~ :~ < t) ~, e 55 ~ 8
I en .~' SU-1j'i - ~ -~'" "',~"'~ ~;,'~
~ ',.',..', :.a ::s .c = "'.' 0 .E ~ 0 ',.""." ~ .00 :a ._ o:l s:l .e-
,', <I:l -- ... !!?:; .<:: - ~ .~ -' Ul "0 '03 oJ
'0 tIS e -; ~:' e 2: ~ Z ,,::. S CI) tlS 'l) 0:: ?3 :;;
o . 0 ea8,~. ~=~..M,. 8~O::!J II
W ~ < ~~. _~.u~. r~<< ...
::I: ::e ~ E-- U ..( < < 'R S ~ ~ :g ::' :2 '0 U U 0)
I ,~,---.... "''''''''' o_,~_ Q........-
(J .>.}:i~CI)~~ ~U.u.'iw; ~z...,~:~ ..JZIolo4.... ~
IIITill [[]
I
. .-
-. ,g ," j" ~ ~ ~ ~ ;l ;l ~ .. ~
"",,,,"'8 ~ 5550:;;~]'" g
;a~~ci 0 0 ;::l Iiblibliba~""'~~ ~
~oo>'<t q q ____>.:>.:>.__11.(1::1:>.
... "I '" 0:-- "<;I "<;I ..!!l ..!!l ..!!l "<;I .......... ..... .... ..$
....J "* jI: .... .... 8 I 1 <l <l 11< 11< 11< e 1-,. I-, ~ 1-,' U co 11<
a ~~~i:5 ~ ~ 551il1il1il5ee~~ !f.!3~
I O...J Ii < e e ~ 'ji ~ ~ ~ ~ · · · ~ 8. 8. '" ~ '. 'a · '.
~ ~ 0 0 ~ ~ ;; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e a ~ ~
a: ..~ <. rj"''''<Il> <Il 00 11<11<1"Jl1"Jl1"Jl1l-<~~Il-<~ QPI"Jl~
~ 0 0
<~ ~ 0
N ~
0...) - -
I ......... 00 00000000088800888"'000""'0""'00"'000
~ d d d d d q q q q q q q q q qq. . . q ~ . . . ~ q ~ q ~ ~ ~ q q ~ q q q
~ ~ ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g gig g g g g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ g ~ g ~ - '" ~
=>i -----
J ~~~~~=~~=~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o=~~ ~ ~N~~~~ II
'" '" ~ 0 '" ~ N ~ '<t _ ~ ~ ~ '" ~ on '" 0 N ~ 0 ~ '<t '<t ~ ~ ~ N '" ~ N 0 ~ N '" '"
I I- ~...,.. ~...; 0; t-= ...; "" 0: ,...: ci 00 .0 ...; ...; 0; ,..; .,.; ...; .,.; 0 .-.: ,..; ...; N ".; ...; ....; ".; 0 t-= t-= ...; ...; 0; 0; oci 0; oci ....;...
'^ ~t':':' "<t "<t '<t 0:-- '<t ~ 0 "<t "<t N '" N '" '" -' Vl -' Vl -' ~ Vl r- '<t Vl -' "., '<t N ~ <'l ~ N ~ ~ <'l""
VJ N N -' N N N ~ N N -' on <'l ~ Vl ~ ~ 0 ~ Vl "<t C "<t N N -' N N "., N _ '" ~ N
a:' -' -' - -' - -'
Li.. '
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ B ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ ~ : ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I
I .,,"'.., VI VI VI 0 Vl C N ~ S ~ N 0:-- ~ ~ 0. r-"..,..ci 0.. ..ci 0.. '" 0 0 - r- M M '" <'l r- ".., '" '" 0 N 0 ,:,2"....
o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '" ~ ~ N ~ '" ~ N N N ~ ~ : ~ 0:-- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - '<t ~ :~
.~ " -' -' -' - -' -' -' -' -' -' -' - -' ..ii'
, R
I en .~ I. - ,E _ I~ II
....J :< i:: "0 .,g ~ ~,.gs:l Illi
-..Vl ~ ~ l'S_ I! 1-o>'c~.d c.::
....J Z ~ > = = ~ ._ .d ~ .d I?:" I e.g 0 <0 ~ ~ = c. CI) <Il I.:.::'.
;": ~ td .- ._ = U td II) td -= "" _ 0 "" 0 ~ :::,..!od I:,"
I J: ;.Ill... ~ - ~.wa 'C i; "'3 ~ 8 ;.;..c 12 "" = td ~ :2 J:: ..... .<1) ~ - a <i ~ ..!l1 ~ = 'V: 'I ~ ~ = CI) .~
1 = ~ s:l c .... ~ 00,-=:;.~ "" <0 <0 'C > ..... .s c td al .d 1-0 0 C' td 'C 1-0 .- td ~ tl
Z :a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~^ s~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~] I ~~I ~ ] Ie! .g 0 I ~I i 6~ ~~ ~^ ~ ~ a ~ c: ~ e ~ a ~ ~ ~
W :~ '" ~ ~ ~ _^ CI) CCI <'ll ~ ::> ~ ~ u 2 [.J..~I ~I ~ =" 00 "E J: "tf .51 c~ ~ 8 ~ 0 ,2 ~:z:,1 gj :a d' ~ b 8 -2 0
C ;; "Z "" 0 .!.ll .! S .5 ~ u g ~"'OI J ~ "'0 ~ C 0 ~ 0 ..::< "';;:) .c a 1-0 .&l l! a ~ .- cO cO .S ... 00 "" IU =
I ~ ,1ll~~~I~~~<f~~I~~jlJ,~~~~~~~~.~~~i5~]~~~~18g.8~~~~~
L.L. ~,o S 8 g a ~ ~ g: tl 8 s ~ 8 a ;g ~ 8 ~ 8 8 a a ;:;: Ci ~ :!:1 ~ ~ ~ 8 S 0 ~ :l ~ e: I;; ~
o :.~:.:;z. g g g goo g g g ..... ~ s g g g g g g g g g g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 51
. ::, - - _ _ _ N N N N N N N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
;il:{::. ~:;: ~ g: g -' 8 8 :g :s g 8 ::g g; ~ .... ~ ::l ~ ~ ~ r-- ::: ~ ~ t::: :::: ~ ;!i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;;l ~ :;:
. :',','.:\:8,' ~ ~ OQ ~ '" g '=" 0\ 0'\ 0\ 0. 0.. 01 '" 01 01 0'\ 0'\ 0'\ '" 01 '" '" 0'\ 01 ~ '" 01 0'\ 0'\ 0. ~ ~ 0'\ 0. 0< 0\ a-
U :IoJ..:' 'fI'ol '" '" "., ~ ~ ~ ~ <"'I .., .... '" .., '" ~ ~ .... ~ .., ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '" '" ~ ~ .., .., '" '" .., '" .., ~ '" ..,
I
I
I ~ !:j 8 :;p;::: >l >l >l >l >l
L/') I ci 0 N N o 0 000
~ ~
,.... ~ ~
-'
.ei I
8 n~
a ,"
E j ~
." .
~ .... .... "'" N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \D \CO 0 ..... .., . 0.
I o N ~ ~ '<I; f-o; r-: ~ ;:4 .. .
~ ~ -' N N ~ a ~ ~ ;:!i ~ ,~ - oS
"; .... 0 '0 .... it ~ ~ \D .... = } ~
0-- OR ~ r-:. '<t ~ ~ ae... "" A t'-R "<t
co . (f'l .... .... N 1:s ~ ~ . "
Cl N = .
..... ~ ~ i
co ..= E-< ..
I C\l ftl .!:! ~
..... ; 1 s ,S
r-. o ~ ]
0 0 .o~ ~ ~ ~
S 8 .~. ~
Cl .~ ,~ " . .ll
I UJ ,- ., ~ i t; o ~ -
p t .~ 0 :':,' " 8 ~ 5 .
~ ~ i ::> .- " '.:. ~ t'" l
> ~ !a :6 :5 ~ ..~ . a
Cl J ~ ~~ " M' E Jl ~
9 ~ ] .~. '" -
'_" <U ] j!
I CIJ ~. .- ~ ~u~
~ -0 ,- '~~ il . ,g~8~~~
8 8~ s ;;; =
u " ' "S .= 5
UJ <l::I:: .!;;! ffi~~ u"'~ -o~ '" . ~
:c I~~~~ ~ ~f~ ~~~ffi.~~ JI
I u .:: ~ iZI ~ Po;~g Vi 8 oS Po;:5 .' ~
IIIIIJ [JJ ~
I~' . . . ~ N ~ ~
8 8
~ ~ ~ ~
I
1te:J >l >l 0 ~ ." ." ." j ~ 1.1 ~ 1
~ ~ ~
~ 0 '" ~ j ~ ~ g "
8 ~ ~ 0 ." .l: ] <2
. !ij! u I ~ .OJ ~ ~ ~ " ~ I
- ~ :: ~ .OJ I I ;;: I ... ~
0 I ." 1 ~ 0; 0; ~ ! !~ i:' 0;
II: e ~ ~ 8 8 .~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ i ~ 1 j
I >- J~ ." ci .. " k ~ ~ ~ e o 8. 8. " H b I
~ ~ '" ~ ~ ~ !
< "' "' J! '" ~ ~ L;;
'" '" 0; '" 0; ... '" ...
Q. H 8 >l
I >- 0 .; ~
...J
::::l 8 8 >l 8 8 ;q 8 >l >l 8 8 8 >l >l >l Si 8 ~ ~ 0 8 l'2 l'2 8 iil ~ 8 8 o 0 o 0
..., N ~ ~ ~ '" '"
o d 0 ci ci ...... 0 o 0 ci g g o 0 o '" ci ...4 ..; ...:; ,,0 Ir'i ci ...; N ~ .....; 0 ci .,:; :i s1
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '" '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N
Cl ""
I z I1III :::: 8 Ol ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g !;: N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '" ~ ~ ~ ~ N N '" ~ ~ '" ':S
0 ~ N '" ..., ~ '" ~ 0 ~ ~ '" ..., '" ~ ::i .. 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ..., '"
r<"i d ~ 06 d ~ '" .,; N t--= ~ ~ g. 0; a; o ~ ., ..; ..0 0\ r..: ...:; ~ N i
u ~ N N ~ ~ ~ ~ '" ~ ~ '" ~ ~ ~ '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .,.. N ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '" ~ o ~ ~ " ~ ~ N N N N ~ ~ ~ '" ~ N
UJ -' ~ ~
CIJ ~
I ;:;
.If! '" ~ 0 '" 0 ;I; ~ o 0 ;; " " ~ 0 o 0 ~ '" ;; 8 8 ~ ~ 0 ::: 8 o N 8 8 8 8 .~
;;I ~ ~ N 0 N N N ~ ~ ~ ~ .,; ::l ~ ~ ~ ~
0< ..; 0< N d ...J. c\ 0; ..; r..: 0; 5 8 : ~ s ~ g d -' S ~ r..: oi c<i on ~ g
0 ~ ~ q ~ ~ N '" tt ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :;: ~ ~ ; ~ ~ .~
'" " ~ ~ .. '" :- :! ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~
~. N ~ ~ ,.; ,.; -' ~ ~ ~ -' ~ -' ~ Ii!
I ,# II
CIJ I !l .13
I ...J " 'il lil j
...J .~ ~ ] ~ i; !] !l J il ~ ~
~ .~ I] il ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
:c ~ ::i'1: ~ " -u ... -0 !!l ~ 1;; -lj 'iii gj ! ,jj
~ <> " !l ~ il ~ <> '> ~ e ~ i '0 ~ .~ 'Ii il
z Ii: ~ ~ " .13 -0 ~ .:; ~ ] ." ~ " " 1li -u ~ e f-< Ii ~ ~
I '" -.:f ~ ~ ~ 'il J " -ll ~ :I:: u i3 Po; ~ ~
I UJ s ~ ~ !1 u tl:: ~ lif .... -.:f " u ~j" '8 ~ g Ii I~ Z ~ [ Ii
.... Vi tl:: ]; ,5 ] <5
Cl ~ .5 E g @ .13 4 ~ ] ~ ~ ! ~
I .,j If -.:f j ] ~ ~ ,"", ~ 'iJ
II: ." ,"l Ii " 3 ~ ~ oS ...... .S '" 0 ] ~ ~ I~ S a
'5 ,- .13 ~ ~ t.l ~ &l ~ " ~
< ;> tl:: <>:: ~ .5 ~ Vi ~ ~ is " :I:: ~ {:: ill
'" '" -0 U IU Po;
..~ I~d ~ ~ ~ ~ N 8 N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 8 '" ~ !:< ~ S 8 8 8 ~ N i ~ ~ ..
~ 8 8 ;:: ~ ~ s s o 0 S s & &
~ ~ :;; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ !;: !;: ~ ~ ;:
N N N '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. .. ~
>- II 0
I- :II !;; :lI ill Ii -::; ~ !;/ ~ !:;> '(I !;: ~ ;: f;l ~ l;! 1;1 ;:I; III liI I;. ill II; iii '" ~ :ii :l; :a :a iO .
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ill ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I u ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '" ~ '" '" ~ '" ~ '" '" ~ ~ ~
I' -. ,
IJ~JSA; MEMO
I fO\SIL T1IG K\GINEERS
I 1326 Energy Po", Drive To: Ms. Cindy Wals~
St, Poul, MN 5S 108 From: Greg Stonehouse.
612,644,4389 Subject: Perry Park Improvements Project
I 1.800,888.2923 Date: July 23, 1996
Fox: 612'644'9446
I Attached is a copy of Partial Pay Estimate number 5 (Final Estimate) for the
referenced project. As indicated on page three of the pay estimate, the total amount
for construction completed to date is $314,495.95 of a total contract amount of
I $314,358.80. As the project is complete and all punchlist items have been
corrected by the Contractor, it would be appropriate to approve the return of
project retainage to the Contract at this time. It should be noted that there has been
I an intermittent requirement to blowout the irrigation system due to additional
modifications to the system, required by the Contractor. As a result, we
I recommend using the Contractor's warrantee bond for any further work, should the
CIVIL ENGINEERING: Contractor be uncooperative in completing such required work. The Contractor is
UN!WNMENiAl aware of the potential need for additional short term maintenance and has indicated
_':OPAL his willingness to comply with City needs, in this respect.
NNING
~ ~ID V/ASfE We do, however, recommend that the City hold final payment until the Contractor
I STRJCTl),~N has submitted consent of surety from his bonding company, and the required State
SL:~V::'Y!NG of Minnesota Form IC-I34 for tax purposes.
~RAFFiC
I TRAr;SPORTAT!m~ If the City Council approves of this pay estimate, it would be appropriate to
direct staff to make payment to Veit & Company, Inc. in the amount of
Ec:C'~:CAl/ MEC-tANiC4L $27,205.05. I will be present at your July 29, 1996 City Council meeting to
I ENGL'JEERING answer any questions you or the City Council may have regarding the pay estimate
IiV,;C o the project in general.
FO'wE DISH!OiJTION
I SCAOA
SYSTEM COWROlS Thank You.
I
I
I OfFICES IN:
_NNEAPOllS
~ lOR lAKE
51. PAUL
I WA5ECA
An Equal Opportunity Employer
,- I
FINAL PAYMENT PSflMATE I
NO.5 (FINAL) ..
nOM: JANUARY 1. 1996
TO: JULY 15. 1996
COrm<AcroR: VElT '" COMPANY. INC. I
ADDRESS: 14(0) VElT PLACE. ROGERS. MN 55374
OWNER: CITY OF ARDEN mLLS, MINNESOTA
PROJEer: CHARLES PERRY PARK IMPROVEMENTS (5211-054-20) I
COMPLETION DATE AMOUNT OF COmRAer:
ORiGINAL: MAY 31.1996 ORiGINAL: $ 308.375,00 I
REVISED: REVISED: $ 314.358.00
- :;Wjp3f:~~A$#1~~~ it.!:!
.. ,."*',,,,, .,,1""""" ""'''ffltw'" I
IIBfl.1
SCHEDULE 1.0 - S\TEWORK I
1 CLEARING'" GRUBBING AC 3,2 3,500.00 0.00 0.00 3.76 13,160.00
2 RELOCATE HYDRANT EA 1 1.000.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.000.00 I
3 WOOD FIBER BLANKE!' SY 2000 1.15 0.00 0.00 2.130.00 2.449,50
3A WOOD FIBER BLANKE!' . REA VY DUT)' SY 432 1.75 0,00 0,00 432.00 756,00
4 SILT FENCE LF 800 2.00 0.00 0,00 2.018.00 4.036.00 -'
T SCHEDULE 1.0 . S\TEWORK TOTAL 0.00 21.401.50
SCHEDULE 2.0. somALL FIELDS I
1 REMOVE GUARDRAIL LF 245 8,00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00
2 REMOVE '" REINSTALL FENCING LF 370 7.00 0.00 0.00 80.00 560.00 I
3 INSTALL 6' mGR CHAIN LINK FENCE LF 190 4,00 0.00 0.00 400.00 1,600.00
4 INSTALL ROODS ON BACKSTOP LF 120 40.00 0.00 0.00 120.00 4.800.00
5 COMMON EXCAVATION CY 40000 2,40 0,00 0.00 41.820.00 100.368.00 I
6 CRUSHED LIMESTONE AGGREGATE CY 800 18.50 0.00 0.00 502.38 9.294.03
T SCHEDULE 2,0. SOFTBALL FIELDS TOTAL 0,00 116.622.03 I
SCHEDULE 3.0 ' srREET '" PARKING AREA
1 COMMON EXCA VA TlON CY 1000 1.50 0.00 0.00 1,000,00 1,500.00 I
2 CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE TON 1650 7.30 0.00 0.00 1,650.00 12.045.00
3 TYPE 31B BIT BASE COURSE TON 435 26.00 0.00 0.00 566.12 14,719.12
4 TACK COAT GAL 265 1.00 275.00 275,00 350.00 350.00
5 TYPE 41A BIT WEAR COURSE TON 435 27.00 303,90 8.205.30 303.90 8,20S.3O I
6 B612 CONCRETE CURB '" GUTrER LF 1570 7.00 90.00 630.00 1,516.00 10,612.00
7 4' SOUD WHITE LINE - PA1N1' LF 2800 0.15 2.800.00 420,00 2.800,00 420,00
8 HANDICAPPED SIGNS EA 4 200.00 4.00 800,00 4.00 800.00 I
9 HANDICAPPED PAVE. MARKINGS EA 4 40.00 4,00 160.00 4.00 160.00
-
T SCHEDULE 3.0. srREET '" PARKING AREA TOTAL 10,490.30 48,811.42 -.-
52oo54#5,XLS PAGEl 5211-054-30 I
I .
I - lil.' -
SCHEDULE 4.0 - ~RM SEWER
I 1 12" HDPE LF 5 J().OO 0.00 0.00 11.00 330,00
2 IS" HDPE LF 270 20.00 0.00 0,00 260.00 5,200,00
3 GRANUl.AJl. FOUNDATION TON 47 20.00 0.00 0.00 95.00 1,900.00
I . INSTALL CATCH BASIN EA 2 600.00 0,00 0.00 2.00 1.200,00
5 INSTALL MANHOLE EA I 1.500.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.500.00
6 INSTALL IS. SURGE BASIN EA 1 300,00 0,00 0.00 1.00 300.00
I 7 GROUTED RlP.RAP CY 14 60.00 0.00 0,00 10,00 600,00
T SCHEDULE 4.0 . STORM SEWER TOTAL 0.00 11.030.00
I SCHEDULE 5.0.11JRF ESTABLISHMEI<r ALT. A
I SOD WI." TOPSOIL SY 12000 1.60 810.00 1.296.00 12.000.00 19.200,00
I 2 SEEDING WI MULCH (SEE MIXTURE 400) AC 8.5 800.00 0.00 0,00 7,06 5.648.00
T SCHEDULE 5.0.11JRF ESTABLlSHMENT ALT. A TOTAL 1.296.00 24.848.00
I SCHEDULE 6.0 ALT. BID ITEM .11JRF IRRIGATION SYSrEl\f
I TURF IRRIGATION SYSTEl\f LS 1 34.000,00 0.00 0,00 1.00 34.000,00
-- T SCHEDULE 6.0 ALT. BID ITEl\(.11JRF IRRIGATION SYSrEl\f TOTAL 0.00 34.000.00
I SCHEDULE 7.0 - L1Gl1TING
I FIELD L1GIlTlNG LS 1 49,000.00 0.00 0,00 1.00 49.000.00
I T SCHEDULE 7.0 - L1Gl1TING TOTAL 0.00 49,000.00
SCHEDULE 7.1- L1Gl1TING ALl'ERNAn;:s
I I PARKING LOT L1GIITS EA 2 1.400,00 0.00 0.00 2.00 2.800,00
2 WOOD POLE DEDUCTION LS I (1.400.00) 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00
I T SCHEDULE 7.1 - L1Gl1TING ALTERNAn;:s TOTAL 0.00 2,800.00
SCHF:nm.F. II 0 CH A Nr.F. ORDF:R NO 1
I 1 WATER SERVICE REPLACEMENT LS I 2.510.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 2.510.00
2 UTILITY REPAIRS LS 1 973.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 973,00
3 SLOPE MODIFICATIONS LS 1 2.soo,oo 0.00 0,00 1.00 2.500.00
I T SCHEDULE 8.0 CHANGE ORDER NO. I-TOTAL 0,00 5.983.00
I TOTAL AMOUNT THIS PERIOD 11.786.30
TOTAL AMOUNT TO DATE 314.495.95
-
.-
I 520054#5.XLS PAGEl 51Q-.0S4-3Q
. I
~\,'lrtJl '-', , .... ....., I
;1\1,1.1
.1
DESCRIPT10N I
SCHEDULE 1.0 - SITEWORK TOTAL 0.00 21.401.50
SCHEDULE 2,0 - SOFTBALL FIELDS TOTAL 0.00 116.622.03
SCHEDULE ),0 _ STREET '" PARKING AREA TOTAL 10.490,30 48,811.42 I
SCHEDULE 4,0 - STORM SEWER TOTAL 0.00 11.030.00
SCHEDULE 5,0 _ TURF ESTABUSHMENT ALT. A TOTAL 1,296,00 24.848.00
SCHEDULE 6,0 ALT, BID ITEM - TURF lRRlGATlON SYSTEM TOTAL 0.00 34,000.00
SCHEDULE 7.0 - UGHT1NG TOTAL 0.00 49,000.00 I
SCHEDULE 7.1- UGHT1NG ALTERNATES TOTAL 0.00 2,800.00
SCHEDULE 8.0 CHANGE ORDER NO. I-TOTAL 0.00 5,983.00
tll'111)lrjil"'Jf.'ltflJ~'JIJlfljll "1"...1111'\1 1111.'111i',lllill I
AMOUNT EARNED Sl1,786.30 S314.495.95
\&WIWJEmgi]lm\tfJt~t%tlYf%t$Ji&1qN \WJf1.i1f@f\wIllitimliif:WfiMf :\\miriitW~r1mm[ttftit1Hru&%t I
AMOUNT RETAINED (SI5.418.75) $13,00
t1~K@tmi*I.*lit4If*W2&I_~ItllWl11j~ ~i%1M_;mIitillmfl$10JI& 1__lti;jW!lli1Iigft#.iliJMt~
MA TER/AL ON SITE SO.OO $13.00
1tQitJjtfgllli~~~mrftZmit.*1t!WNt1Jtt*l\ :\l1rl1iI!0t1~tllllriW:~u~ ;~IJWflshklill_~~~i~tml~- I
MATERIAL DEDuer. SO.OO SO.OO
:1iJ@ttJ.g~WirjJ.t1fn~NNltfJ.;fm~Mi~mfj 1~;f&gmltm~*Iriffiml{\~lmjf.t\ \\UlilililiitlWgllW&}.t1i~ttlW;t
PREVIOUS PAYMENTS .............................. S287 ,290.90 c'
::@@Wilit&;1~tlt\H1&Waltwrlf\Wit*If%t gtWtltliliHi1fdltfJl$11t4iiftN\ ~lffii[mKi~WtIOOill]I1V*fi,W
AMOUNT DUE $V ,205.05 S27.205.05
]t~mmtrm}@~]nrmMnmwm@mmmttl dXlmm6gmmnrmmmnwmww WgMWJrFM@giWftf%WM1tttt
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.
S20054#S.XLS PAGE 3 520-054-30 I
I ~
IS
I 'M i MEMO
I
CO,\SILTUG E~G1~EEIIS
I 1326 Energy Park Drive To: Mr. Brian Fritsinger~
SI, Paul, MN 55108 From: Greg Stonehouse~
612,644'4389 Subject: 1995 Storm Drainage Improvements
I 1,800.888,2923 Date: July 23, 1996
Fax: 612,644,9446
I Attached is a copy of Partial Pay Estimate number 2 (Final Estimate) for the
referenced project. As indicated on page two of the pay estimate, the total amount
for construction completed to date is $54,442,00 of a total contract amount of
I $54,466,00. As the project is complete and all punchlist items have been corrected
by the Contractor, is would be appropriate to approve the return of all retainage to
the Contractor as well. We recommend holding final payment; however, until the
I Contractor has submitted consent of surety from his bonding company and
Minnesota Tax form, IC-134.
I (NIL ENGII\ceJiNG If the Council approves of this pay estimate, it would be appropriate for the
E'JV,~ONMENTAl Council to approve staff to make payment in the amount of $20,089.00 The
I\:"C"" Contractor has arranged that all payment for this contract be made to Northern
'NNING Escrow, Incorporated at the following address:
SOUDWAST:
I STRU(TJR':',L Northern Escrow, Inc.
SUF\,'::YiNG 1275 South Robert Street
EAF~;C West St. Paul, Minnesota 55118
I TRANs"m7AT:ON
I will be present at your July 29, 1996 City Council Meeting to answer any
E Lc C T ~ !eA.' MEeHAN ICA~ questions you or the City Council may have regarding the pay estimate or the
I EN':';NEEF:~~':; project in general.
HVA::
POW:R D!SEM'ION Thank You.
I S(ADA
SYSTEM CONiROLS
I
I
Ie OFFICES IN:
I <<INNEAPOllS
RIOR lAKE
SI, PAUL
I WASECA
An Equal Opportunity Employer
~ I
fl"IfAL PAntE.vr ESI1MATE ':
NO. 21FINAL)
FROM: MAY 4,1996
TO: JULY 15. 1996
CONTRACFOR: JAY BROTHERS, INC. I
ADDR.E.SS: 9218 LAKE DRIVE N.E.. FOREST LAKE. MN lS02S
OMol~ CITY OF ARDEN HilLS. MINNESOTA
PROJECT: 1m STORM WATER IMPROVEMENTS (S2Q..064..30) I
COMPLETION DATE AMOtINT OF CONTRACT:
ORlGINAL: JULY 15. 1996 ORIGINAL: S 54.466.00 I
REVISEIr. REVISED:
tl,lllllltlil11i.II[,,1itillill.,Jlll III. I..~ I
SCRF.nm.F. 1 /) 1 J.1nl' .JOSEPHlNF. nrm.F.T I
1 MUCK EXCAVATION CY 20 10,00 0.00 0.00 20.00 200.00
2 PAVEMENTREMQVAL SY 60 2.00 0.00 0.00 66.00 132.00 I
3 REMOVE CMP IF 96 26.00 0.00 0.00 96,00 2.496.00
4 REMOVE CMP FES EA 4 50.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 200.00
5 J<j" ARCH PIPE (Cl 1lA) IF 60 188.00 0,00 0.00 60,00 11,280.00 '1
6 36' ARCH RCP FES. WISAFETY GUARD EA 4 1.200.00 0.00 0,00 4.00 4.800,00
7 FOUNDATION MATERIAL CY 20 20.00 16.00 320.00 J<j,00 720.00
8 COMMON BORROW CY 7 15.00 7.00 105.00 7.00 105.00 I
9 DITCH GRADING CY 4 15.00 4,00 60.00 4.00 60.00
10 RIP RAP, CLASS III. GROlITED CY 22 60.00 22,00 1.320.00 22.00 1.320.00
II SEEDING AC 0,5 2.000.00 0.50 I,(J(X).OO 0.50 1.000.00 I
12 WOOD RBER BLANKET - HIGH VELOCITY SY 250 5.00 250.00 1,2S0.00 250,00 '.250.00
13 SILT FENCE - HEAVY DU1Y IF 120 3.00 40,00 120,00 40.00 120.00
14 BITUMINOUS PATCH SY 60 16.00 60.00 960.00 60.00 960,00 I
15 4- EQUIV. WIDTH STRIPING. YELLOW LF 80 1.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00
16 4" EQUlV. WIDTH srRlPING. WHITE IF 80 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00
T SCHEDli'LE 1.9 LAKE JOSEPHINE Oli7LET-TOTAL 5.175.00 24.683.00 I
Sf:HF.n1JT.F. 2.0 KARTR J.tlC'F. RAVTNF. .
1 MUCK EXCA VA TlON CY 50 18,50 50,00 925.00 50.00 925.00
2 DITCH GRADING (P) CY 30 15.00 30.00 450.00 30.00 450.00
3 REMOVE tr HOPE IF II 5,00 0.00 0.00 11.00 55.00 I
4 BALE CHECKS EA 8 145.00 0,00 0.00 8.00 1,160.00
5 SILT FENCE LF 400 3.00 150.00 450.00 250.00 750.00
6 CHECK DAM EA 3 760.00 3,00 2,280.00 3.00 2,280,00 eI
7 lr HOPE LF 26 74.00 0.00 0.00 26.00 1.924.00
8 12 a HOPE APRON EA 1 100.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 100.00 -I
9 18 - HDPE LF 172 34.50 0.00 0.00 172.00 5,934.00
.0 18- CONCRETE SURGE BASIN EA 1 1,000,00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1,000.00
11 IS- HOPE APRON EA 1 120.00 0,00 0,00 1.00 120.00 .
Jl;\c:IcricaI\j~1h::la:1\52OCl6&1:!.Xl.S PAGE 1 520-064-30
I .
:'- illlllitJl~ 1111.
12 27. DIAMETER. CATCH BASIN EA 2 1.370.00 0.00 0,00 2.00 2.740.00
I 13 STANDARD MANHOLE (430) EA I 2.78.1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 2,7SS.OO
14 RIP RAP. CLASS 1tI. GROUTED CY 29.3 60.00 29.30 1,7.58.00 29,30 1.758.00
IS CLEARING &. GRUBBING AC 0,25 1.000.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 250,00
I 16 WOOD FIBER BLANKET. HIGH VELOCITY SY SOIl 5.00 500.00 2,.500.00 500.00 2.soo,00
17 SEEDING AC 0..5 2.000.00 0.50 1,000.00 0,50 1.000,00
I T SCHEDULE 2.0 KARTII LAKE RAVINE-TOTAL 9.363.00 25.731.00
I SCHlIDUI.E:] B R~PI..ACEMFNT 011' PlmF}iOTRUN RRJJV:F. W/Mrr.VF.RT
I PEDfSTRlAN BRIDGE REMOVAL l.S 1 SOIl.OO 0,00 0.00 1.00 500,00
2 24" HOPE LP 38 38.00 0.00 0,00 38.00 1.444,00
. 3 240 HOPE APRON EA 2 175,00 0.00 0.00 2.00 350,00
4 BITUMINOUS TRAILWAY SF 320 1.75 320.00 560.00 320.00 sal.OO
5 RIP RAP. ClASS m. GROUTED CY 12 60,00 16.57 994,20 16,57 994.20
I T SCHEDULE 3.0 REPLACEMENT OF PEDFSl1UAN BRIDGE W/ClJL VERT-TOTAL 1.554,20 3.848.20
., SCHJIDt7l.E 4 0 AnnmONAI. TT'F.M~
I r POl. YSTYRENE INSULATION 4' II g' EA 3 60,00 3.00 180.00 3.00 180.00
I T SCHEDULE4.0 ADDmONAL ITEMS-TOTAL 180.00 180.00
TOTAL AMOUNT THIS PERIOD 16,272.20
. TOTAL AMQUNTTO DATE 54.442,20
I DESCRIPTION TOTAL THIS PERJOO TOTAL TO DATE
SCHEDULE 1.0 LAKE JOSEPHINE OUTLET-TOTAL 5,175.00 24.683.00
I SCHEDULE 2.0 KARTH LAKE RA VINE-TOTAL 9.363.00 25.731.00
SCHEDULE 3.0 REPLACEMENT OF PEDESTRlAN BRIDGE WJCU 1,554,20 3.848.20
SCHEDULE 4,0 ADOmONAL ITEMS-TOTAL 180.00 180.00
I I'Ji!!11Iltl.lil...ll Itlllljlll~lll~lll
AMOUNT EARNED $16.272.20 $54.442.20
I 'H@.]gtHm~~@tMMtmtt~l&~m~rt1@tttill&: limHt~Wl11$If%flfuwlrt1f$mt IWM.tTBIfUlti1}f#jm~
AMOUNT RETAINED ($3.817.00) SO,OO
H~!tt@m~~lti1~~mtJt~M~~fJtiWmlilili1~t~l1Tili~~ IiflM;l{MiW&1Mftflffiilitti;fi% j1[JiliWffillfulirktwtl1Wmll{ili
MATERIAL ON SITE SO.OO SO.OO
I. ;!~*~~mH~rJl11f,m~Et*t*tff1il@~Mt%ttt0ttt IlIll1IilifJiWtl:?ftm%tlWiI ]i&1m~rs~~lfi;liBli{i~t1~ltfE~
MA TERlAL DEDUCT. SO.OO SO.OO
\tm~~tmmm~g~t~M~~i~~~t11MmW~t~t~tflB1Wftt ]:ltnm%lmWlilftl~i%f{.I@&. ~211f11:mtlE]mi\BWt2~)t~1
.- PREVlOUSPAYMENTS ..........,.,..................... $34,353.00
m*WmHili~mm@rmi%I~W$;frg1I~W:t.li1i[ ~r~W~llilliwiliiP@m'lilmit?1it ~#tMtt1f@fi@!fitWWgtlWm[$
AMOUNT DUE $20.089.20 $20.089.20
/t~:,.}W&tlMI@tWmW~m~mmmwH~m1w~@ tm@*#~m%W%tfNF#~WmWRW ~@1g@iliW@@gWm#@t~ g#~
................. ..
I PAGE 2 520-064-30
n:\c1cril;al\:'i20\t;.r.c;c/\SW064.r2.XLS
:t/M~ ,
i
MEMO
I CO\SlL T1\G ENGI\EERS
1326 Ener9Y Pa,k Dr;", To: Mr. Brian Fritsinger
I 51, Paul, MN 55108 From: Greg Stonehouse\bSS
612,644-4389 Subject: 1996 Street Improvements Project
I 1,800,888,2923 Date: July 23, 1996
fax: 612,644-9446
I Attached is a copy of Partial Pay Estimate number lfor the referenced project. As
indicated on page eight of the pay estimate, the total amount for construction
completed to date is $29,431.50 of a total contract amount of $379,973.43. We
I have recommended retaining 10% of this amount or $2,943.15.
If the Council approves of this pay estimate, it would be appropriate for the
I Council to approve staff to make payment to T .A. Shifsky & Sons in the
amount of $26,488.35 I will be present at your July 29, 1996 City Council
Meeting to answer any questions you or the City Council may have regarding the
I CIViL ENGINEERiNG. pay estimate or the project in general.
ENVIRONMENiA:.
. MlJNIClrAL Thank You,
I FlA~NING
SOLID WASTE
STRUCTURAL
I SL"N~'iING
TRf;HiC
TRANSFO;:T A TION
I E LEC TRICA,L/MECHAr.ICAL
ENGjNE:~iNG
I HVAC
FO"NEH ,lSTRIB\jTION
S(ADA
I SYSTEM CONTROlS
I
I
I. OfFICES IN:
MINNEAPOLIS
I PRIOR LAKE
51, PAlIl
I W ASECA
An Equal Opportunity Employer
----'----------'--- ------ -
I" ..
,
.. PARTIAL PAYMENT ESTIMATE
I NO.1
FROM: JUNE 17. 1996
I TO, JULY I, 1996
CONTRACTOR: T.A. SCHIFSKY & SONS, INC.
ADDRESS: 2370 HIGHWAY 36, N. ST. PAUL. MN 55109
I OWNER: CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA
PROJECT: 1996 STREET MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENT (520-068-].0)
COMPLETION DATE AMOUNl' OF CONTRACT:
I ORIGINAL: SEPTEMBER 13. 1996 ORIGINAL: $ 379.973.43
REVISED: REVISED:
I li'llll-ll!tll-\'II'll(.l~l~tlllli(l(fll-l;ll!i(III\11111.iji') ll"llllil~l~ Ilrlltl.~
I Sr.HF.DtIT.E t.O OAK AVF.NUE
1 CLEAR AND GRUB ACRE 0,15 1,100.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00
2 REMOVE eMP PIPE IF 53 11.00 53.00 583.00 53,00 583.00
I 3 REMOVE CATCH BASIN EA 1 220.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0,00
. COMMON EXCA V AnON (P) CY 2010 4.45 0.00 0,00 0,00 0,00
t' 5 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION CY IllS{) 4.45 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00
. SELECT GRANULAR BORROW - CV CY 1850 7,00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00
7 SUBGRADE PREPARATION RDST A 15 125.00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
. TOPSOIL BORROW - CV CY 350 .,00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,00
I 9 AGGREGATE BASE.. CLASS SA TN 2350 7,15 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00
10 MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE 5Y 90 1.50 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
11 TYPE 41A Bn1JMINOUS WEAR COURSE TN 410 22.50 0,00 0,00 0.00 0,00
I 12 TYPE 318 BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE TN 530 2LSO 0,00 0,00 0,00 0.00
13 r BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT 5Y .90 10.00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00
I' BITUMINOUS FOR TACK COAT GAL 220 1.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0,00
15 SURMOUNTABLE CONC. CURB & GUTIER IF 3555 .,40 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00
I I. CONCRETE MEDIAN TAPER EA 1 2W,00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00
17 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SY 140 27,66 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00
" 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APRON SY 260 27.66 0,00 0,00 0.00 0,00
I 10 INLET PROTECTION EA 5 82.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00
20 SODDING, TYPE LAWN & BOULEVARD 5Y 4000 1.47 0,00 0.00 0,00 0,00
21 4" PERFORATED HOPE PIPE DRAIN WITH IF 3555 3.00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
I TYPE I GEOTEXTILESOCK
22 DRAIN TILE CORE CONNECTIONS EA . 165.00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
23 18" RCP SAFETY APRON EA 2 682.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0,00
I 2. 12" Rep PIPE CL III, DESIGN 3006 IF 81 27.50 47.00 1.292.50 47,00 1,192.50
15 IS- RCP PIPE CL III, DESIGN 3006 IF ., 3L90 59.00 1,882.10 59.00 1,882.10
2. CONSTRUCT MANHOLE, STORM 48- D1A. EA 1 1,100.00 1.00 1,100,00 1.00 1.100.00
27 CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN, '24" x 36" EA 4 935.00 2,00 1,870.00 2.00 1,870.00
.. 2' RECONSTRUCT MANHOLE EA I 880.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00
29 ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING EA . I2S.00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
30 ADJUST VALVE BOX EA 1 75.00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
I 31 REPAIR BROKEN VALVE BOX EA I 220.00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0,00
32 RANDOM RIP RAP, CLASS 3 CY 3.. 27.50 3.60 99,00 3,60 99,00
33 FURNISH & PLANT SHRUB EA 12 40.00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0.00
I 3. WOOD FIBER BLANKET, TYPE REGULAR 5Y 100 1.76 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
n:\clerical\S20\excel\520068# I, XLS PAGE 1 520-068-30
~ 'I
,
I1111111111! 111111111111,( ~
I
35 SILT FENCE PREASSEMBLED LF 250 2,00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0,00
3. SEEDING ACRE 0.25 3,080.00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 I
T SCHEDULE 1.0 OAK AVENUE-TOTAL 6,826.60 6,826.60
SCHF.mrr F. 2 0 EJDR r.JRCI.F. I
. CLEAR AND GRUB TREE EA I 150.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0,00
2 REMOVE RCP PIPE LF .8 11.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I
3 REMOVE CATCH BASIN EA 1 220.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00
4 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER LF 50 2.5G 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
5 SAt V AGE WOOD FENCE LS I 200,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
. COMMON EXCA V A TION (P) CY 870 4.45 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I
7 SUBGRADE EXCA V A TION CY 700 4.45 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
8 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW _ CV CY 700 7,00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0,00
. SUBGRADE PREPARATION RDST A 3,5 150.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00 I
10 TOPSOIL BORROW - CV CY 110 .,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0.00
11 AGGREGATE BASE -- CLASS SA TN 870 7.25 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
12 MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE SY 50 2.50 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00 I
13 TYPE 41A BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE TN .80 23.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00
14 TYPE 3IB BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE TN 225 22.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0,00
" 2" BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SY 110 to.OO 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 ..
.. BITUMINOUS FOR TACK COAT GAL .5 1.00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
17 4' CONCRETE WALK SF 50 3.08 0.00 0,00 0,00 0,00
18 8618 CONCRETE CURB & GUlTER LF 870 7.90 0,00 0,00 0,00 0.00
.. 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SY 60 30.16 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 I
20 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APRON SY 85 30.76 0,00 0,00 0,00 0.00
21 CONe. PED. RAMP .. EXPOSED AGG. EA I 80,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0.00
22 INLET PROTECTION EA 2 82.50 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 I
23 SODDING, TYPE LAWN & BOULEVARD SY 1190 1.47 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
24 4~ PERFORATED HOPE PIPE DRAIN Willi LF 850 5.50 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
TYPE I GEOTEXTILE SOCK I
25 DRAIN TILE CORE CONNECfrONS EA 2 165.00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0.00
2. 18" RCP SAFETY APRON EA 1 682.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00
27 12' RCP PIPE CL III, DESIGN 3006 LF 30 27.50 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 I
28 18" RCP PIPE CL III, DESIGN 3006 LF 60 31.90 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
2. CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN, 24' x 36' EA 2 925,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0.00
30 ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING EA 3 125.00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
3. ADJUST VALVE BOX EA 2 75.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 I
32 RANDOM RIP RAP, CLASS 3 CY 4.. 27.50 0,00 0.00 0,00 0,00
33 FURNISH & PLANT TREE EA I 250.00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0.00
34 WOOD FIBER BLANKET. TYPE REGULAR SY 90 1.16 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I
35 SILT FENCE PREASSEMBLED LF 40 2,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
3. SEEDING ACRE 0.1 3,080.00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
T SCHEDULE 2.0 EIDE cmCLE-TOTAL 0,00 0.00 ..
SrHFDlJT R,] 0 PASCAl. AVF.NTJR
1 REMOVE CATCH BASIN EA 2 210.00 2.00 420,00 2,00 420.00 I
2 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUrrER LF 25 2.50 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3 COMMON EXCA VA TION (P) CY 500 4.45 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
n: \c1erical\520\excel\52D068# 1.XLS PAGE 2 520-068.30 I
-.
I' .
.. lllllilllllillll il\jllll.j
I
I scmmm.F. 9 0 FF.RNWOOD COURT SF.Al, COAT
I BITUMINOUS MATERIAL, CRS-2 GAL 255 0.91 0.00 0,00 0,00 0,00
2 FA-2, Cl.C.. AGGREGATE TON 13 19.25 0,00 0.00 0,00 0,00
3 CRACK SEAL LF 180 0.62 225.00 139.50 225.00 139.50
. SCHEDULE 9.0 FERNWODD COURT SEAL COAT-TOTAL 139.50 139.50
I SCHEDlIl F. 10 0 EDGRWATF.R AVF.N1JR SEAL COAT
I BITUMINOUS MATERIAL, eRS-2 GAL 535 0.91 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
2 FA-2, CL.C.. AGGREGATE TON 27 19.25 0,00 0,00 0,00 0.00
I 3 CRACK SEAL LF 450 0.62 560.00 347.20 560.00 347.20
SCHIWULE 10.0 EDGEWATER AVENUE SEAL COAT-TOTAL 347.20 347.20
I SCHF.mn.F.ll 0 INDIAN OAKS CIReLli: SF-AI. COAT
I BITUMINOUS MATERIAL, CRS-2 GAL 380 0.91 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00
2 FA-2, CL.c., AGGREGATE TON 19 19.25 0.00 0,00 0,00 0,00
. 3 CRACK SEAL LF 290 0.62 365.00 226.30 365.00 226.30
.. SCHEDULE 11.0 INDIAN OAKS CIRCLE SEAL COAT-TOTAL 226.30 226.30
scmmm F. 12 0 INmAN OAKS COURT SF-At. COAT
I BITUMINOUS MATERIAL. CRS.2 GAL 630 0.91 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00
I 2 FA.2. CL.C.. AGGREGATE TON 32 19.25 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,00
3 CRACK SEAL LF 360 0.62 450.00 279.00 450.00 279.00
SCHEDULE lZ.O INDIAN OAKS COURT SEAL COAT-TOTAL 279.00 279.00
. SCHF.Dlru: 13 0 ROYAL LANF. SRAL COAT
1 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL, CRS-2 GAL 960 0.91 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00
I 2 FA-2, Cl.C.. AGGREGATE TON 48 19.25 0,00 0,00 0.00 0,00
3 CRACK SEAL LF 580 0.62 725.00 449.50 725.00 449.50
I SCHEDULE 13.0 ROYAL LANE SEAL COAT-TOTAL 449.50 449.50
SCHRDULF. 14 OWFST FI.ORAl, DRJVF. :'i:.FAr COAT
I I BITUMINOUS MATERIAL. CRS-2 GAL 117.5 0.91 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
2 FA-2, CL.e.. AGGREGATE TON 60 19.25 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
3 CRACK SEAL LF 650 0.62 810.00 502.20 810.00 502,20
I SCHEDULE 14.0 WEST FLORAL DRIVE SEAL COAT-TOTAL 502,20 502,20
SCHEDln F. l!il 0 DAWN ClRr.l F. SFAL COAT
.. I BITUMINOUS MATERIAL, CRS-2 GAL 340 0.91 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
2 FA-2. CL.C., AGGREGATE TON 17 19.25 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00
3 CRACK SEAL LF 210 0.62 265,00 164.30 265.00 164.30
I SCHEDULE 15,0 DAWN CIRCLE SEAL COAT-TOTAL 164.30 164.30
I n: \clerical\520\excel\,520068# I.XLS PAGE.5 520-068-30
-- --- -
---.-- --~
, .
~f~~1~ifi~:~~~~lJmil~Em!~i~t,~~~:fi~~;:. !illlllll~illlli ~
:m~;::;:::,:,:~~;~:~::,:~::;:::n:~;~::;~;~:~;:,:i:\:;W~::::mWt
':"':"';<':N:.;...:.".:.:.:...;.:~.~:.:.~;.;...:.:,.:.:N'"".;...,.,..".,....:.,.:.
!~~i~il1~1~~~ilil~~ijl.ili[i; I
.:.,.".;.~,...:.:.:.".:.:.....:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.~".:':.:.:~.:.:.;.".:.>:<.".:.".:.>:
SCHlmm,E 16 0 CHATHAM AVF.NlJE SEAl. r.OAT I
1 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL, CRS-2 GAL 46&l 0.91 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
2 FA.2, CL.C., AGGREGATE TON 235 19.25 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
3 CRACK SEAL LF 2720 0.62 3,400.00 2,108.00 3,400.00 2,108.00
SCHEDULE 16.0 CHAmAM AVENUE SEAL COAT-TOTAL 2,108.00 2,108.00 I
SCHEDUI,E 17 0 CHATHAM CIRCI.E SEAl, COAT I
1 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL, CRS-2 GAL 300 0.91 0,00 0,00 0,00 0.00
2 FA-2, CL.C., AGGREGATE TON 15 19.25 0.00 0,00 0,00 0,00
3 CRACK SEAL LF 130 0.62 160.00 99.20 160.00 99,20 I
SCHEDULE 17,0 CHAmAM CIRCLE SEAL COAT-TOTAL 99.20 99_20
SCHEmn.F. tll 0 CHATHAM COURT SRAJ, COAT I
1 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL, CRS-2 GAL 410 0.91 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00
2 FA-2, CL.C., AGGREGATE TON 20 19,25 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
3 CRACK SEAL LF 220 0.62 275.00 170.50 275.00 170.50 I
SCHEDULE 18.0 CHAmAM COURT SEAL COAT-TOTAL 170.50 no.so ..
SC.HF.DlfI,F. 19 0 RIKF. TRAn. SF.AI. C.OA.T
1 BITUMINOUS MA TERrAL, CRS-2 GAL 1340 0.91 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
2 FA-2, CL.C., AGGREGATE TON 67 19.25 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 I
SCHEDULE 19.0 BIKE TRAIL SEAL COAT-TOTAL 0,00 0,00
SCHEDULE 20 0 ARDEN OAKS DRIVE OVERI A Y I
1 CRACK SEAL LF 2500 0,62 0,00 0.00 0,00 0,00
2 CUT & PATCH EXISTING BITUMINOUS SY 450 12.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00
3 TACK COAT GAL 415 1.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 I
4 BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE, 2331 TYPE 41A TON 800 22,50 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
5 MILLING SY 3150 1.10 0.00 0,00 0,00 0,00
6 ADJUST MANHOLE CASTING EA 14 125.00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 I
7 ADJUST GATE VALVE BOX EA 4 75.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0,00
8 INSTALL NEW GATE VALVE BOX TOP EA 2 75.00 1.00 75.00 1.00 75.00
9 REMOVE CONC VALLEY GUTIER SF 84 2.50 90,00 225.00 90,00 225.00 I
10 CONCRETE VALLEY GUITER SF 84 4.10 90,00 369.00 90,00 369.00
11 REMOVE SURMOUNTABLE CONC. CURB LF 200 1.50 150,00 225.00 150.00 225.00
12 SURMOUNTABLE CONC. CURB & GUITER LF 200 13.20 150.00 1.980.00 150.00 1.980_00
I
SCHEDULE 2:0.0 ARDEN OAKS DRIVE OVERLAY-TOTAL 2,874.00 2,814.00
.liir.mmm F. 210 ARDF.N OAK.S COURT ow>>, !y ..
1 CRACK SEAL LF 400 0.62 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
2 CUT & PATCH EXISTING BITUMINOUS SY 100 12.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00
3 TACK COAT GAL 100 1.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 I
4 BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE, 2331 TIPE 41A TON 175 24.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,00
5 MILLING SY 600 1.25 0,00 0.00 0,00 0,00
n: \c1erical\$20\excel\520068# I. XLS PAGE 6 520-068-30 I
I' .
.
.. il!lll\lllll~ \,illlrlillliii.,l
I
I 6 ADJUST MANHOLE CASTING EA 2 125.00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
7 ADJUST GATE VALVE BOX EA 1 75.00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
SCHEDULE 21.0 ARDEN OAKS COURT OVERLAY-TOTAL 0,00 0,00
. SeRF-mil ,Ii: 12 n PTNF. TRRF. DRIVF. OVF.Rl.A V
I CRACK SEAL LF , 1300 0.62 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,00
I 2 CUT & PATCH EXISTING BITUMINOUS SY 275 12.00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
3 TACK COAT GAL 250 1.00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
4 BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE, 2331 TYPE 41A TON 490 22.50 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
I 5 MILLING SY 1500 UO 0,00 0.00 0,00 0,00
6 ADJUST MANHOLE CASTING EA 3 125.00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0.00
7 PAVE. STRIP. .. 4- SOLID YELLOW LF 2200 0.65 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,00
8 PAVE. STRIP..- 4~ SOLID WHITE LF 200 0.65 0,00 0,00 0.00 0,00
. . PAVE. STRIP. n 4~ INTERMITTENT WHITE LF 140 0,65 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00
10 LEFT TURN ARROW EA 2 38.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00
11 RIGHT TURN ARROW EA 2 38.00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
I 12 PAVE. MARKING - "ONLY" EA 2 66,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
13 PAVE. MARKING -. CROSSWALK SF '" 1.92 0,00 0,00 0,00 0.00
.. SCHEDULE 22.0 PINE TREE DRIVE OVERLAY-TOTAL 0,00 0.00
scmmnr.1i: 2.1 n Mr.CRACKF.N I,ANF. OVERI A Y
I 1 CRACK SEAL LF 500 0.62 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
2 CUT & PATCH EXISTING BITUMINOUS SY 110 12.00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
3 TACK COAT GAL 110 1.00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0,00
4 BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE, 233i TIPE 4lA TON 205 23.50 0,00 0,00 0,00 0.00
I 5 MILLING SY 720 1.25 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00
6 ADJUST MANHOLE CASTING EA 3 ]25.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00
7 ADJUST GATE VALVE BOX EA 1 75.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0,00
I SCHEDULE 23.0 McCRACKEN LANE OVERLAY-TOTAL 0.00 0.00
. TOTAL AMOUNT THIS PERIOD 29,431.50
TOTAL AMOUNT TO DATE 29,431.50
.
I
~
I
. n: \clerical\520\excel\.'520068# 1.XLS PAGE 7 520-068-30
:~I
1;llllllllllil!1 ~
I
SCHEDULE 1.0 OAK A VENUE.. TOTAl.. 6,826.60 6,826.60 I
SCHEDULE 2.0 EIDE CIRClE..TOTAL 0,00 0,00
SCHEDULE 3.0 PASCAL A VENUE..TOTAL 2,445.00 2.445.00
SCHEDULE 4.0 McCRACKEN LANE ..TOTAL 12,232.90 12,232.90 I
SCHEDULE 5.0 RIDGEWOOD COURTnTOTAL 0,00 0.00
SCHEDULE 6.0 LAMETII CIRCLE SEAL COAT--TOTAL 148.80 148.80
SCflEDULE 7.0 LAMETTI LANE SEAL COAT..TOTAL 279.00 279.00 I
SCHEDULE 8.0 FERNWOOD ROAD SEAL COATuTOTAL 139.50 139.50
SCHEDULE 9.0 FERNWOOD COURT SEAL COAT--TOTAL 139.50 139.50
SCHEDULE 10.0 EDGEWATER AVENUE SEAL COAT--TOTAL 347.20 347.20
SCHEDULE 11.0 INDIAN OAKS CIRCLE SEAL COAT..IDIAL 226.30 226.30 I
SCHEDULE 12.0 INDIAN OAKS COURT SEAL COAT..TOTAL 279.00 279.00
SCHEDULE B.O ROYAL LANE SEAL COAT--TOTAL 449.50 449.50
SCHEDULE 14.0 WEST FLORAL DRIVE SEAL COAT-TOTAL 502.20 502.20
SCHEDULE 15.0 DAWN CIRCLE SEAL COAT--TOTAL 164.30 164.30 I
SCHEDULE 16.0 CHATI-lAM AVENUE SEAL COAT--TOTAL 2,108.00 2,108.00
SCHEDULE 17.0 CHA TI-lAM CIRCLE SEAL COAT-TOTAL 99.20 99,20
SCHEDULE 18.0 CHATI-lAM COURT SEAL COAT..TOTAL 170.50 170.:50
SCHEDULE 19.0 BIKE TRAIL SEAL COAT..TOTAL 0,00 0,00 I
SCHEDULE 20.0 ARDEN OAKS DRIVE OVERLAY--TOTAL 2.874.00 2,874.00
SCHEDULE 21.0 ARDEN OAKS COURT OVERLAYnTOTAL 0.00 0.00
SCHEDULE 22.0 PINE TREE DRIVE OVERLAY-TOTAL 0,00 0,00 ..
SCHEDULE 23.0 McCRACKEN LANE OVERLAY ..TOT At 0.00 0.00
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
n: \c1erical\520\excel\520068# I. X LS PAGE 8 52Q..068.30 I
I
."
~ CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
I MEMORANDUM
DATE: July 29, 1996
I TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: '" Cindy S. Walsh, Parks & Recreation Director ~ {iJ
I ~r
SUBJECT: Change Order for Northern Trail Segment
I Backf:round
I At the June 24, 1996 City Council meeting, the City Council inquired whether Thor
Construction, Inc., would be willing to give the City a price quote for the Northern Trail
segment. The intent was to possibly issue a Change Order if the price from the contractor was
I reasonable.
The contractor has indicated that they can complete the work in conjunction with the 1996 trail
I construction for the same unit prices outlined in the current contract. Please see the attached
memo from City Engineer, Greg Stonehouse for additional information.
~ Cost Estimates
The initial cost estimate for this final segment of trail construction was $38,000. The updated
cost estimate is $39,656 based on the same unit prices outlined in the current contract. The
I updated estimate does include approximately $2,000 for the relocation of the North Townhome
Association irrigation system that lies within the City's easement. The North Townhome
Association has agreed to provide the City with additional easement in the area south of Arden
I View Drive. Acquiring this easement will allow the trail to be constructed in the current location
of the grass hiking trail. The majority of the City's easement consists of wetland and difficult
I terrain. In return for the additional easement, the City will relocate the portion ofthe sprinkler
system currently located within the City's easement.
I Bud!!et Implications
1996 Base Bid Trail Construction $ 66,920.35
1996/1997 Northern Trail Segment 39.656.00
I Total Trail Construction Costs $ 106.576.35
Fundinf:
I 1996 Park Fund Trail Development $ 40,000.00
DNR Grant 45,191.50
1997 Park Fund Trail Development 20,000.00
1- 1998 Park Fund Trail Development 1.384.85
Total Funding Sources $ 106.576.25
I
I
- --.-- --
I
...
CHANGE ORDER NORTHERN TRAIL SEGMENT PAGE 2 41
Timelines I
Should the City Council decide to approve this Change Order, the contractor could possibly
finish both trail segments in 1996. However, because of a wetland area north of Arden Vista I
Court, all construction within this area needs additional approval by the Rice Creek Watershed
District. City Engineer, Greg Stonehouse, is looking into this issue and may have an update for
the Council at the meeting on July 29, 1996. In the event that the City is not able to obtain a I
second wetland permit in 1996, construction in the wetland area will have to wait until the spring
of 1997. City Engineer Stonehouse will also confirm whether the contractor will extend their
prices into 1997. I
Recommendation
I recommend the adoption of the following motion: "move to approve Change Order number one I
to Thor Construction, Inc. for construction of the Northern Trail segment."
I
I
411
I
I
I
I
I
I
.1
I
I
I
..
, interoffice
I M E M 0 RAN 0 U M
I to: Cindy Walsh
from: Greg Stonehousec;;5>
I subject: Northern Bike Trail Segment
date: July 22, 1996
I This memorandum is provided to assist you in outlining the proposed extension of the 1996 Bike
Trail Improvement project. The area of interest extends from a point at the current northern
extent of the project, to include the segment from Arden Vista Court to Highway 96.
I We have initiated the preparation of plans for this segment of the trail and anticipate their
. completion by Monday, July 29, 1996. The estimated construction cost of that segment of trail is
approximately $39,656. That amount includes approximately $2,000 for the relocation of
irrigation equipment within the northern townhouse development.
. The Contractor has indicated that he can complete the work in conjunction with the proposed
.- 1996 work and will do so for the same unit prices outlined in the current contract. One item that
may create a delay in proceeding until 1997 is the potential wetland impacts of the area
immediately north of Arden Vista Court. The Wetland Conservation Act has been amended to
allow the impact of up to 2,000 square feet per affected wetland; however, the approval process
I may take six to ten weeks. Therefore, it may be necessary to complete this phase of the project
in 1997. We will inquire as to the Contractor's ability to use the same unit prices on this leg of
the project in 1997 prior to finalizing Change Order number one for the project.
I We anticipate this memorandum addresses your concerns regarding the project. Please contact
I our office with any further questions.
I
I
I
~
I
I
I" ,.-"
I CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
~ MEMORANDUM
DATE: July 29,1996
I TO: Mayor and City Council
Kevin Ringwald, Community Development Director ~
I FROM:
SUBJECT: Case #95-23, Minor Subdivision (Registered Land Survey)
I Bart Buetow, 1433 Forest Lane
I Reauest
The applicant is requesting re-approval of a final Registered Land Survey (RLS) consisting of
three (3) Tracts on a 1.11 acre parcel zoned R-I Single Family Residential District (Exhibit A).
I Backg-round
The final RLS was originally approved by the City Council on April 3, 1996. The final RLS had
I to be recorded by Friday, May 31, 1996 or that approval would become void. The applicant ran
into some unexpected delays in recording the RLS, due to that the property is in an estate and
that the property is registered as Torren's property with Ramsey County and was unable to
Ie record the RLS by the required deadline. The applicant anticipates that if the RLS is re-approved
that they will be able to record the RLS by the middle of August of 1996.
I Recordin~ of RLS
The City Code (Subdivision Ordinance) in Chapter 22-4, (b), (4), states in relevant part: "If the
final plat is approved by the city council, the subdivider shall record it with the county recorder
I or registrar oftitles within sixty (60) days after the date of approval; otherwise, the approval of
the final plat shall be considered void". If the City Council approves the final RLS on Monday,
I July 29, 1996, then the approval of the final RLS would become void on Friday, September 27,
1996.
I Recommendation
The Staff recommends that the final Registered Land Survey be re-approved in Planning Case
95-23, subject to the original conditions of approval, which are:
. I. Provision ofthe appropriate utility and drainage easements documents for review by the
City Attorney and approval by the City Council;
I 2. Recording of the utility and drainage easement documents with Ramsey County with the
RLS;
3. Provision of a temporary rock construction entrance, as described in Exhibit C of the
I Staff memorandum (dated February 7,1996);
4. Compliance with the Zoning Ordinance, Section VI, G, 8, a and b;
rll
..
j
- 'cX I,l
~~~ I~~
E-.~ -1 I
--b~ <1S~~ ~ . ~
~~ ~
4 P/~ . .~
,<u<-~"" ~~: \J'~I',qq
'~ ~ ~ Ie:
..' "'-~',...
~ ~~ ~~
I '0~ -<"~~~,,
-t., ""~" .
'::e y':: '~~~J-
~~~~~
,~~ ~
.",~ ~ - IS: ~,'
.~ ~/~
~-~,
· l<J<...~'
.~
. ~
Q\ \1
if ' .
~' ,
, Ii'
o \~
/" J"
t'
fl , 3S)l:jd
t~ ,0- t00 - ~,
" ;'"
\
/
..IS
- fiN{
or
<.to",
--,?f
,,{ :"
$6
-f (}r
r/rr
., ~'I
5. Modification of the silt fence, such that the trees to be preserved are wholly located on I
one side of the silt fence and the area to be disturbed is located on the other side of the silt ..'
fence;
6. Provision of snow fencing around all trees (including their drip lines) that fall outside of
the proposed building area on Tracts B and C, as shown on Exhibit A, page 1 of2 of the
Staff memorandum (dated February 7,1996); I
7. Payment of the appropriate park dedication fees;
8. Removal of the brick retaining wall on Tracts A and B, prior to the issuance of any
building permits or the transfer of title on Tracts A and B; and I
9. Removal of the porch on the southeast comer of the home on Tract A (1433 Forest Lane),
prior to the issuance of any building permits or the transfer of title on Tracts A and B.
I
I
I
I
eI
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,\~
11
l
~~ J' "
... 'li( i (', .~ /
',~;; :J ." ~..,.
It..'"l' :";/1:.::
'0..~.1 ,~
, ~'6 E'~
, t....,.~~.....
....4; ...:;...:,:,-f
. "",,()
. . ,~
~Q: ,~ I,.....,
~~ .
'.:, i1
-"'\ ,....... ~ ~..~-I ~~~.
, ..-..........
...... ,~
................ ',.',..
~ v
~ :'\ /
'.:,:, ~p.V \ "
~ . .f, l.~
-' .... ~~..:...~ ~
c~ -', ,,,,,. ;'l(f . i!'~'.
.<;><(.\c S ~ ,,_~ ' ,,~' /1;: 'Ililt
o?v 'I' . -.. ~~...~...; il
v'" '~d ~ ' . .:!~..,."
a a,.:t --- ~ II\; :'\I''''q-
:.~l ~ ~ ii', ~~~.. I
.-.:. lJ)t\. ~~o, ~ ~.. 4; t't.
f'Io'- ... ~ ...." ..., ;
'" ,.po ~~<i \: -e .j/'-Y- -:0.,"" I
~ \ t,..~ ,--:'\ ~...:L ~ ~I .......~..\
tf. I 'f'..-V'" ,~ . ..
I.:.. I I ~~~ ~\,.;'b- \ -?"'.r
\ 'r ... ""
. I 1. 4
::: I. .lit /....
" 'n~\ W
.... ~ .0 _..
'" --- ()'" .-"
... '9 .....; ~; /
" :g ~., .~~
"., J c.,
,'..' I ~
, ,~ /
" ... -
1,1. ,I I,'..... "'-
. oJ. 'Y"
;:> ,'-,' p.C:- j
_, ~~ "I .. r::
'" I.... ".
... ... ~ t<<,
. .1-"". /
,,~l{ij.~
d.......'~;p~l{
,';. ...;j~Oj't:: /
\-' -f; ....::~~.
'QO;;t~'"
""(J~ '
fj" /
40 / .,
/
I
I' '.. fXij.I($IT A V'-
** 100'39~d l~~O~ ** -.-.- -',-
~
I ~~ \c\\(\4<.-
RE" C'lJ.t: * tIG-;2. ~
I ~~'^'~ ~.
I
Y>l~, ~ tbk. b ~ ~ 0.. ~ t--
I ~~ fly.. tIM-. ~~..-j-6"W ~ ~,
Wt...~~ &V- ",).J.-I--fi.,e.p 60 tJ"~J
I ~~~~~~~ (;bL..
I.v1n-k. W\ ~+, ~.. :3 (I.l"U.b l ~, fIw,... ~
I ~~~.M~ ~~ tW.-
lito ~ ' it
Ie ,~.S~'"f~~'tZ. ~
~~~~~ ~~/~
~ 'tl> ~o.. ~C/'1 ~ ~ ~
I
, ~
~ ~ -h ~ ~ ,...<;...J ~
I ~> ..:tM.. .tt(.~ ~ ~ ~
~ -'jo,IHJ,'::"'t;. h-,fJ bh.... AI!).. ~. i,D~ ~
I ~~ ~ 1fn ~ J-., ...{ ~~'
~~~
I
. M.
I
I
..
I
[00 . 3~Jljd 8rn Sd3dOOS ~N[~ WQdj P[:6 964 ~Jt lnc
--
~z<ff1f3{T A ""'1, ~-'I
) fQGl&TllfUC L.ANO euR~ NO. ~
\
I .?:J'
\ ()"Q~ ~"
,,-'~'" ~ ::; 1-
() .~. . tJ' .
; ...\.~,~# ..'" /'
"f-; .o.r~'otJ ~~oJ'~ ~ tJ> I
...:'I.~"'J''')'b ~" .
, "'".......tJ
C"~';- .,,'(j .,
~~ \0;- 'to
.. "~
/0*" """ c"-f. I
" r--f.~..
"
"
"
"
GRAPHIC SCALE ,
,.. '" I
~ . .. ~ .. '" '"
~_.. ~ I ,..
'"
-- : ~,
.. JUT
SCAlZ: 1 iDch _ .0 ~ TF<.ACT C I
';;~
..",
"
~"'lr~ ,
-- " I
" ~~I -.. --
-:::
\ TRACT I
I
I ''':-
I A"
I L" &.11 ....-
'" I /
: .~ I
\( ,', \,..../
"""~, / '.'
~
--
'.' ,,, . I
(~. , /\
..... ~'.?..
'.' ..:
TRACT . /
... I
'" /
: : ~
~ .:"
~4' ",
4' .<. / I
. " .1- ..~'~"
'\'.~..r> I.....
\~1)" ~'lo" ..
\~'.~~ .,:;.?:
" ..."'~' ~ ~ /
t7'~ ., " #~.... I
'" 'i).q,.~\"J'
(,9; /
O~"
"0 / I
/
. D-ot"" htn monum."t IotJnd a:# Mt<<i
/ 0 !>tItM1_ 1/2 fndt by 14 ;,.:n ~ mot'IIJf'/'Hftt ~t oM I
/' marlc..t by JU.$. /<k1. 177fi.j
~ /)..,ot~ m~~ dh~
pi" o.""Di_ dl:tt(7/~ fH' r<<ord plat of AI?l>D/ H1U.S NO. ,; I
.. G. AUC> 4 ~, INC. ~ Fat' ~ o( t/ri# R~t.,-".d L~.su--y, ~ ""I IiH 0'
Lot 14. Siod .t ~ HiI. No. 2. Is ~ to M- g
~ 111 N 16?O'~ w
L.~nd e..rv~r.
6llDT 2 OIl 2 11._'6 I
I'
.
I CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
,. MEMORANDUM
DATE: July 29, 1996
I TO: Mayor and City Council
I FROM: Kevin Ringwald, Community Development Director ~
SUBJECT: Planning Cases 95-16, 96-08, and 96-11
I The following is a brief review of the requests and the recommendations of the Planning
I Commission.
Case 95-16. Balfany Develo\)ment Companv. 2035 Thorn Drive. Preliminarv Plat
I 1. Request
The applicant is requesting approval of a five lot detached single family preliminary plat
I (Oakridge) on 4.63 acres, zoned R-2 Single and Two Family Residential District (Exhibit
A). The request includes a variance from the required right-of way width and cul-de-sac
diameter.
.. 2. Background
The applicant has been working on developing this parcel for residential purposes since
I September of 1993. In short, the main discussion points have centered on the number of
units the property could accommodate and the size of the roadway required to service
I those units. Last year we left off with the applicant requesting six lots and providing 60
feet ofright-of-way (Exhibit B). The Planning Commission recommended approval
including Lot 5, recognizing that Lot 5 contains sufficient buildable area, such that the
I Planning Commission will not entertain variance requests on said Lot 5, the preliminary
plat ofOakridge homes being subject to:
I I. Resolution of the sanitary sewer location, preferable Concept I of the two (2) that
were presented;
2. Provision of a silt fence and sediment and erosion control plan, for approval by
I the City Engineer;
3. Provision of a utility plan, including the NURP pond design, for approval by the
City Engineer;
I 4. Approval ofthe grading and utility plans, including the silt fence, sediment and
erosion control, and the NURP pond plans, by the Rice Creek Watershed District;
5. Preservation of those trees shown on the Tree Preservation plan;
I 6. Payment of the appropriate park dedication fees, to be determined by the City
Council;
f'
I
'I
.
7. Compliance with the applicable sections of the City Code and the Zoning I
Ordinance; and ..
8. Provision of a Drainage and Utility Easement over the delineated wetland area.
However, the applicant was unsuccessful in obtaining the necessary sanitary sewer
easements so that this plan could move forward. Therefore, the applicant has modified I
the proposal such that one lot has been removed and the width of the right-of-way and
diameter of the cul-de-sac have been reduced to accommodate the revised design.
3. Planninl! Commission Recommendation I
The Planning Commission recommends approval of Planning Case 95-16, preliminary
plat, including a variance from the required right-of way width and cul-de-sac diameter. I
subject to the following conditions:
I. Provision of an acceptable street name for the proposed cul-de-sac; I
2. Approval of the Rice Creek Watershed District if the proposed plans;
, Preservation of those trees shown on the Tree Preservation Plan; and
J.
4. Payment of the appropriate park dedication fee. I
Case 96-08. Lerov and Bernice Albierg. 1680 Oak Avenue. Minor Subdivision I
1. Request
The applicant is requesting approval of a preliminary minor subdivision (land swap) on a ..
1.32 acre parcel zoned R-l Single Family Residential District (Exhibit B).
2. Backl!round I
The Albjerg property contains an existing single family home (1680 Oak Avenue). The
Albjerg property is serviced by an easement off of Oak A venue. The northwest comer of
the Albjerg's home and a portion of their driveway turnaround currently encroaches onto I
Tony Schmidt Park (Ramsey County). The Albjerg's and Ramsey County have
negotiated an arrangement whereby the Albjerg's can correct these encroachments
through this land swap. I
3. Planning Commission Recommendation
The Planning Commission recommends approval of Planning Case 96-08, preliminary I
minor subdivision, subject to the recording of the access easements (Easements A and B)
and the release the existing access easement. I
Case 96-11. Michael Welsh. 1509 Colleen Avenue. Administrative Appeal (Fence)
1. Request I
The applicant is appealing an administrative order to modify an existing fence so that the
fence complies with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance (Exhibit C). I
..
I
I>
I 2. Backg-round
t- In April of 1996, the City received a complaint regarding a fence located at 1509 Colleen
Avenue. The complaint stated that the fence was not 30 percent open for air flow and
that the finished side of the fence was not facing out, as required by the City Code,
Sections VI, E, 4, c and f. Staff investigated the complaint and confirmed that the fence
I was in violation of City Code, Sections VI, E, 4, c and f.
On April 19, 1996, the City provided Mr. Welsh with written notification that his fence
I was not in compliance with the requirements of the City Code. In that letter, Mr. Welsh
was given 60 days to modify the fence. Generally, the modifications that could be made
I to the fence to make it conforming with the City Code are that every other board on the
fence would have to be removed from the inside of the fence and placed on the outside of
the fence. On June 12, 1996, the City received an appeal to the administrative order to
I modify the fence at 1509 Colleen Avenue.
3. Administrative Anneal
I The City Code in Section VIII, G, states the following:
1. Appeals. The Planning Commission shall hear any appeals where it is alleged
that there is an error in any order, requirement, decision or determination made by
I an administrative officer in the interpretation, application, and/or enforcement of
this Ordinance and shall report its findings and recommendations to the City
Council for action.
Ie 2. Effect of Determinations. The findings and determinations made by the Planning
Commission shall be advisory only and shall have no binding effect. The Council
I shall take such action on the findings and recommendations of the Planning
Commission as it deems proper in the circumstances.
I 4. Planning Commission Recommendation
The Planning Commission recommends approval of Planning Case 96-11, administrative
I appeal for fencing, based on unusual circumstances (City Code Section VI, E, 4, n). The
unusual circumstances are:
I 1. The Applicant obtained a building permit for the fence and may not have been
informed of the requirements for the construction of said fence;
2 The fence has been in place for at least nine years, without receiving a complaint,
I and when constructed the adjacent property was undeveloped;
" The topography of the property to the east of the applicants has been recently
J.
altered, such that there currently exists a severe grade differential between the lots
I which may not allow for the necessary modifications to the fence; and
4. The fence has been well taken care of and complies with the remaining code
I requirements.
..
I
I' , ~rr A II\.{
r.l ~. h
1 1
!
1 Pii' i~ ' "
J<g I" _,
sl~_ .V
Is -g ~
" ~. <Y
I ~
s.
I I "
~
I
~l
I ~ -
~ . -""-::::::::"0 ....
.--f ~.::'~ @
Ie ~----... I
L----- .,. ---Fi:! .
I ~--------I .
~ .
~~'
I / j ; I
I ; , !
- ,
T~~ ;
I b\~..~ " '
.lJ_~ ''''~
;; Ii ", ~.:
.L_'-' ~I! '"'
I \ ~'I. 'i:,
LJ ..M.5' i'
, I
I !' ~ 1 . I
~ I
;,;
I "r II
. .
i ~ .
.
I --IIJ ' 1-
ft . II ,- OAKRIDGE I;:~':'":"J(" James R Hill inc
J; oil l'l p: ARDEN HlLLS._ :',:_:~:',,:',:"',- " . I .
:: ~ I~ ~ I f:r ~~ ~ EXISTING CONDITIONS ~:~:.:~:,;:,,;,:. I j PlANNERS/ENGINEERS/SURVEYORS
:I:.::z.... f-. 1"1 FDA \ ", flOO,", c,,~, ". ~~",IO_ I....,... y. nil'
1 ~ <I ! ~ I I,., OAKRIDGE HOMES, INC. . .... '_-/ 1IIIItI-lG"'" .....'"
.. ~ 66OO''''''''':O-..''''...xJIlC....c.>:N''''-__~
-... 'M'_
?./j
,.
ImnlC lIS i 5 e ,..-c,
~SSQS S
......... " '0 : C . I '"
! ' i C"\' 't.
I .. ~ r>-
im!l" I~'T 0 . ,-) ,
.. ~ j ~ ~ ~ n ~ ili ! ~ ! ;^'?" _A
",
~ 0" C CO ~ .?:; ~ 1,l i;i !:I; ~ ~ ^-;) .....'>,...)
c : e' i.li c '" ,- ,
~ "m ,-,' - ,
; ") ..
- ...>' ~"
~ ::l '" G\ t; ,-).".
............... "
I:l .. m '" m ,-,'
.... ':!l ~ ~ !:;
C')
"
-^,
.>
- ,
'" \
'.'
, \
" \ ..
r' \ "G'
.,) ).. ".......
- ,
r ')-'~ // ~) .
_,/" /
'.1 /
/
- /
... '. '" "
;.; ,;/'-..
~ II ',~ ........ ~~,
.. . I ~.... ~ ...
/; ,J...\ ._-............... /.',""
I;........ .,.. ''"~,
;; ('j / ,.~ ',,~""" 0
II; 1/ """ .",'<> '::-\..............
,/ , , , I \ '
,/ -' ",~
/1 ", \
1/ ~ .. '.
"'II :...... .'" ..... \ ..,
/1 ~ t .., _ \ ~1
_II'" ~ __-\ ~:::
,.....r~' -, \ '"
/>71 ClOt. _<- " I '\
[Dl -,/ ;./ " _... I '\
I -(., -- t..
'I./" '----.
't- '; /' _',
J / . '::.
''''LJ /1 / \ \ "'.
/L__/ t" I
, ~ ~ ))
---~
, ...
.' I
, ,
r . , ,
", .'
' , '0
'''~/>- 'Ii '" .'
C-' ! I .
~ " ,"
r -------- _nn________ '" --------=---.-:.-.:::--1
II
. ~ . ~
. ~ ~.. r
" ." . , . : .
" .: @
---------~
, ,
, ,
, "___nul..
~ , t32' toe' .
0
.
;,; ...........,
'" Ii
,. ,.
, 0,
N lll!l!~~
0 ! ~ I;;!'; L - i!
~;~:~ ~ ~
'~Ih t-" ,
, 11 ~ I I :
, ~;: , I ~
.
rr OAKRIDGE ~ Jf ~~:~~~~~':;~~~}~~~~~;
i! ~ lO , ~'l0E'" HlLl$,'" ......,,,
~ . ~ ~ PRELIMINARY PLAT ~
- J .~
OAKRIOGE HOMES, INC. _ .."uu... ..,IOUI"
.""',"""""__""._....."-"WT..._ _
I
I' ,
,
-,' '",'
. 'I' \\-- r ~
' II: ~,~;
I ' h~L - "
1 ;II : ,- L ';-- i ~
~ i IJ![':; . ,
. ~
< .
~ Cl ~. " f"l! ~ n i I
o ! #=!; . ~
z . .. . 0 ! . "
... - - --.-- -.-.. ~ ! . 0 ,
~ << ~ " . ! . i
r :L;:..;. 'j I I j : I 0
o [. \;:C' I m
m "" l~ <.m ~ 0 ~
~ ~ ::, \ ...oo --- t I . I
! <;
1 "( z
; . z I , ~
~, ij,j "i; II~ ~ ,
ii!i i~ i:! i;i !
I ... !
i I
1 .
('j
r.
1 -^,
,0
'~')'
','
,
" ..'
1 ,r,,-
r)o~~
_,I}
'.1
-'
1 "
.-1
l ,
1 -
~
Ie I N
I
I
1 4..!'
"U:
-'-,
1 ,
\
"~ !
"
1 C'}-), ~
- . ,i'" l ',"<
- ~ i , i
. "
1 ' '\ ,
.., . -r' ~ "
, ,{ ~~,"i:if:[2JJ" i ~,
~ - - "'I'--.",'-l~r.l t \
~" ., I r
1 Ii: , , ,... >!.~., " ,;1,
;;; i ...--. 'j.~~' . "~(~< ;. ,
I " q .'
If- ,
:' II C.
",
1 .
", j j I '[1 -~ "f
, I II
, I r ' ~ (. I I ) , ..- ; "
:~i z I I ~ j II' ..
0, "
1 ~, 'I'" . 0
1 ;: ~] ~ ~ : i ! S ~ ~
'Ii, ; ! : ~ i l i 0
, ,," , ~~~~~
~ l: :
it , 2 ~ ~ : ~ : ~ ~ ~
-:. l,i -
I ~ ~
-- -M-;~ ,
II] ltJ RHII'
, , ~ rf? p pi OAKRIDGE ~:i:fi~;,~i: .' I " .. ames , I I Inc.
.. . -~-
~ c !! i ." ..~" PRELIMINARY GRADING & EROSION CONTROL :;:::-.:" ~~.:' ~' '\' , PlANNERS I ENGINEERS I SURVEYORS
1 , ' .. ; 0 ,., - ~ \J--...,/Il.GlIjt"..u.s..,,"..._.'...."ll'
0 ~ "" . OAKRIDGE HOMES. INC.
. .. ~ ::;r.:~. 8 .-...... flllIlUI" I" nUl"
____~~CUO'..._ ...-
----
tift{ .." 'n""._ .'. ;.,-, , ,~. "l., ~ I"':i-';T
!' I!~ !,;Il--~i I 1\"; t"""---!-'-""~--'----i f I 1: -.J I ",
,; I' i:"":i ',' !', . ".. , I '! ~ .' ',---"'- '^' ~! '
~ rb; : .l<i!!j 0 !.' /' , \ ~T ",' I I}"~. I III :W;:! .......,-,.c__~ ._,__.:'~_
It hin' , /". c;, ,../ _,' -'I ,~......,_. :II ",. . c, "._ .
'd]!l:!l', ,I, .', 1. _.r,'. ~ ".1'1 '., I ':'\J+"1. ~-'.:, ~!>;j" l,l '1":1'1 d.
n ,--~,.I..'~ --- /<"; '(,. .. 9 ' ~ ,', 1 ", "-~)-;,._ :II '." I "~ I l
~- ' '--~ .1' / '--' ~ ~ :;; '\ 'I~ ", :. li71: .., 1:1;! . J :i---"-- 'i ..
~\, '...lLJ~"\w.&' ~ "J'. I .---l.'l!=! '. "'r= .1(,."
-, ,~~ I ,;-LI: .. '.;. ,', I r ,----./\ ... ~v, ;: "'1
c. tli,:il" --- ""i,c,,,.,,: . Y~'" 1"'''lct '''111'',';',1'''''''1''1''1' r 'n, J --f
l' ,':, "lii,.l --- t> , '.-\ - ."1 ,. -t -II, "I,,} r
i i! -i-.J I\~l q ii :', q 3 \- '-,;. ,~ :f ~ J; i :111!~ 1[1,'.n; l' I,i:;; ;1 . ::'L ill
I. l'iJl I'."" - jI '" \ ,,~' .' '1_ 'II. ~I';' 1i' ~ I:" " 1 I I
~ !! i~;-~ ~'1!1 If l! i; !;.~ :I/o \. "'" ::.-. ,::.; L:.i ,,_ i "{ i!1 I.m (I [ U ! ,!
. WI,I! i " ! I , ~ ,i J 1< 1'1". t~li '" : II iii ~ l .
.. ,- I. { 'T" 0 - I; ~ ' '.Ii ~~i, ~ t 'I~ I
'~"'I",'I".I"1 " I','.. <
~:I" ~[, '.:; 1 I "I' ~
H,;:~,~":,! 'I; 'Ii -;~l !iI'~!!lj\ vL 31 /];
'".j,J.'.'....1 '.'.' I, I", .,".'t-" . '.~.'.'. "~'~-F~..""
'~hi-+ rTo1rJ~'. :!i j; ::,1 I!illi":: :~:~=i-- :- .
o i1"'.' <i '", iI!' .. I , 1:;'1' '.', p I'
~ lit j~ il; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 5 ~~ _ !J' . -..1" - ~ :'ii :,; kL\,~.~, l~f;l
! iJ.i.'i f~; ~ F ~ ~ p '" ~ !ir~. ~- ----I=-I~~' ~ ;: ~!:i t:: ! i~~
-l ,=,; i ~ t !:: f!::~", I: :.1';1 : '[f,f[ . . -.f 1< " L' .~I !!
~ it 'ni I . ,i ',d 'I I 'I! ~ ~ 'JIJ.. __'ci~W,}-'. '. iI.; in: ii: 2 ii 'i"" rl_~~
~ \r1!, I, , I" ~ L c~__.--'----' II''''I! 'i '!!i h , ' .~ ~!~
~ :'l! i<< ~a a a~ '" i 'l~lill'I;II'~o'" -{-G.-ry'- I I'
~ I' " ~. ~"~ III ~ Ji" ~ 11 !! ' .. j rr
~ "~lli: !! ~!'i"5 ~ II'!,;' I ;, .
t Ii)' ~!I ~~ . ~~ /"/" ....... !
~ I Q~. Vl / '"
. !! j ,/ "
, ~,
,I; \....'
'I ...... ~'\....
- j /" , ''-- /.,...
-< ~ . ; ,-'~ -..... / "'",:
~ II! ii 'I ('.>'\">' /"r, ......:::-:< ~,
t- , '", ........ ~
~ ImJl I II' '/, ~'"
. ", \ l '. I / ' 'Ie
~ I, " i '(" "/, , ,
~ li'.l"I'1 I n ~ :':Jl'=' II /,/ "~ I
"~j . ',~'-" / "
~'J i ii! / ! :' '-,
." !', 'I" ,?;'-:::----... \
, 'J' I \! '8 '/ - ! : ~ /./ '-, \
~ L-;'-t, ~, 11 )'--;'/ " " .....;;,/ """~~/' ........... ~
... ~- ~'" ..'; ,I " /./";) "
T ~:: '/,; , , /" / ,><....!! \l
"0 " ; , /," .-,;0" < \
~, ' ,if /-, ,~~___ ~/ .'/~' if"ri" \ \
e: 'i " / ,/' ,',' ...... /.....;:~ ~/' n p.
.0 /' / J' ......./ ' ,
f I " ..' ,j ~_. ""-:./ // I
lir- ,/!_~/' .-",- ~/' ..' ~~' ~.".., \
, ./ ~')~>\ "'I;;;~ ,
/ " __ / 00, )
/n____n"__'~ ~\ I'" Co1
, '><I I
,. ~f' /
-'= - " r. !(l I
i'P --------_ I
~ . - ---~----_::=___ __ I
:, -- --
\ - -- --~
\ I. i ;If --<::'-::'~<'-i
i.. Iou Iii .. 7
S 'I 0 " 'ii ,
~! ,~~ i \ IJl ili_=_=,=___,~~___,___~
~ Iii :
II I I'"
~ i'" ".,." ;.1
~, .~I:i,;;ili, ; Ii,:, :,'nJ1j
= " ,,' II' '" J " , I'
9 ":. tI :; ~l; ~ _____1__ --~ :1" ~"
J' ''''i':i E.;, ' :.!
, ["'. I" II "I
_..J..;. {".~." "! '" I~ :$' I I '
'.' "i ~ r ;- ,.
,'''';j' P Ilfh~, u__ ,- '. I! I i n
!l: : i ~:.;, -~ , ~ ~ ~ .; t S j I!
N 'll '" e j!... " ,....1,1
~ ; ,~ b ,'! 'I " '1 , ,dil. I"
' I" I; 01- I. . ~. 5 _ ~
" ~ -<,' I ..... -l 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ i I ~ ,t ~
~ w: ~ ! t: t J .
: ~ ~ :
, '
~;
.'
i! t
, "~ OAKRIDGE I"-f'':f.f:/~I g. ..' . James R, Hill inc.
~ I~ ~! ~~; PREL1MINARYUTILITY PLAN ~.~fJf~~~ (! ,: Pl.ANNE RS/nu;.INEERS/iuAVE'1'ORS
... ,..:1...,,' i..J FOR ,.~;J::t// \ .. '/IU...,,,..,,,I~"""""'''''''''lll''
~ 0 ~ .t, OAKRIDGE: HOMES. INC. -.....;.z::~,?)' ~. _' "l""~""" UHlU
#0- I .K<lF......'''''''''-''''__..MC....'''..M....... _._.... _
I'
~~ _ ~ / ,_ ~Y1f1B~T e:, Yy
PART or THE NDARY SURVEY Of'
o EAST 1/
ii, r SECTION 2." Of THE SOUT 1
_ _ CI ' T 30 N !fEAST
I -.~'O S"'llL,' sit., w..",R R"'ILRO"'O " ~S~ g~u~EN HIi.&."3 ll', 1/4
, '" - . ~~~" .--"""~~,
.:------'_'----' _ IfF .'?t",z =
~ ___ ."",",' _._, ,C": -- ' ,.", -- ' -- - "'--
1 - .-,,- - ..""-~ ' -'.
......,. ,\ I' '
.. _', l,r "1-1 ' ~
- .-
'n; ~ :::.,.-"" Wlo'O.~ I l:!!!....~
~ ~=~N'- ,. --
1 I . - ,/~ I """".""i"'~-"
, -~ . . -j,' ..,."-,,,,,,,-,'" '
" .." -- -~'--'" --
( ( _ G:;l, ,_..-1 ....=,=:=::.:.:-~=..""~' "
_ _ ~. I ,.="""''-;;''''::'' 'I
'. ,- .. >-' ~.~....,,...,,,,,,.h ,I
I ~ _ --' " ~.z..;c:-"",,* ,.,
. ;:,,1 __ . 'I' =,..::r.-:.'-"':;:='-'== ,\ COT ,
_ ~. ___ _ . __.----,--'.-. r
_.,..." ,_~ -_c .,,~~..== - .
.,=,,'=. - _._=" . __ ,._ __,..." I
,.-...::..=-='.J1~ =...:-=-- . ,.. "~ ,,, '. ' '
- _, .. - _'" \ ,,"'" " , I
I_::~.:,;=...::"'':JF:?:~'' =_,_.,""'."" '::"- I . ", --' ,"
.. .. -" ,,'- - ." '
._=,:'_. f'-"""""'= " . - ' i ~..,"". .- ' ..
_",".".,._.",. ..,""'.....""" , , ' _ F-' l:rr 1 ":
~."""..."'.. ~.~""'~.".'" -, I -- ~-" '[j~--- ....'~'---------
_.:=.."-_ :-:?".>1:-.."::E'::::;U:'::=:-=- 1'0. ,,=..... . 1 . ~ -- ==- ( i:F.
"" ",,,,,..,,,,~: . __ _ . ,_ ,_,-C'" - .' .
~ - "~-_.,-",,., ~. - ' .--. -
,..-=-.:-=-:. _.=:..~:t.:=.. 'f;mZ - I . n.. .....' illI',,'
-'~-'~=- ,,--"'" ..... .- ~ . .
._.'::- __=:: t:,-;;:,.""'.....:-. 1 ........-. ;..,. - -- ~." ,-; 8
__ .. ,,__ __,,,..0__ I . F 0.0
.~;;G.f"'"'- iif't-"=-"" ~ .. . -: "I
11.- ,.-'" .,...-~-- 1-- '-- ..
. _" ,__ ';;"'f","'-'-~'" .. -
".::.:;::'_....._ __r~_$.c.~=:.::..;~.. !.I."'::""=-'"=" ~"':'l~ -~ ,....
_ ..':-:-'''''_ ,.._=___,=_.... u ~. I .
_. ""j,..,=:-..... _-",_,_",,,,,,"." 7-.L
"",-,.-,-,-",,;,' ---,..~. - . ",..
--~~."'" ..... .."," ~ .. _.
"""" , ,\'.' , .'Z.~ . -, '
''""''' - \~_' ...._ [1;- ' -
-~--- '. - --
1 --~. ,,;
, f1j;<;""-.....~ ..-:: ---
... - ..--
KEMPER 6: ASS
\.NCI-=.~sINc.1
I -,
1
1
1
1
ft
1
2/'f 'I
FiECEiVEC 1
Pi1f~Y 1 ; 1996 --
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS :JTY /If '~'utl'J HILI,'
----------------- 1
Ramsey County and the owners of 1680 Oak Avenue, Arden Hills,
LeRoy and Bernice Albjerg, have reached an agreement to exchange 1
lands. The. exchange will involve the transfer of a 0.25 acre
parcel and a 0.135 acre easement to Mr, and Ms, Albjerg, in order
to clarify the common property boundary and to resolve issues of 1
encroachment onto the Tony Schmidt County Park,
Mr. and Ns. Albjerg have agreed to transfer equal sized land and
easement parcels to Ramsey County, each of which will be 1
incorporated into the Tony Schmidt County Park, The exchange
will result in no net loss of park land. Any conveyance of park
land by Ramsey County must be approved by ordinance of the County 1
Board.
The properties proposed for exchange and their general location 1
are shown on the attached maps. As a property owner within 1000
feet of the property, you are hereby given notice of two public
hearings in accordance with the provisions of the Ramsey County
Home Rule Charter, Section 2.02(K) and Section 5.02. "
The first public hearing will be held June 4, 1996, at 9:00 a.m"
in the Council Chambers, 3rd Floor of the Ramsey County Court 1
House, 15 West Kellogg Boulevard, St. Paul, !-IN 55102, to receive
comment on a proposed land exchange within the Tony Schmidt
County Park, The first reading of the proposed ordinance will 1
take place at this meeting.
The second public hearing will be held in the same location at
9:00 a.m. , June 18, 1996, to receJ.ve comment on the proposed 1
o~dinance approving the land exchange. The second reading of the
proposed ordinance will be held at this time,
For additional information about the proposed land exchange, 1
please call 777-1707.
If you desire to address the Ramsey County Board of Commissioners 1
on this matter, please notify Bonnie Jackelen, Chief Clerk -
County Board, 250 Court House, St, Paul, !-IN 55102 or by telephone
at (612) 266-8014, by 4:30 p.m. , June 3 , 1996 if you wish to 1
testify at the June 4th hearing, or by 4:30 p.m. , June 17, 1996
if you wish to testify at the June 18th hearing.
1
..
1
I'
LOCATION MAP Vy
I
" ,'.
I '" ~=~E"~~" ~
I -.- PARK BOUNDARY \\
_0_._'_'- CITY PARK BOUNDARY ~ ' '
I 11, <'".-' i
"'" /, iit,,:,)',,?:,')
I ~i'i
II J I \ '- r ,llli!cL..
I.~ fl'i~ \ c-. ~,~,-_.'"= Ii 4:%.'.,,,;111,"1',:,11;1',"',1111
'I l L--, L ,- \ //""""""",..,"""""'"..,""""""""....'1
-1~, ',-~ ~-=-~'- J~~::I;i!lllil~;,.
Ie I' \i il,/ Ii l[ \ """. ~--,~,~ "<-"~"'" ,<2.091
'\/1' f ' " .~, ,,0 ~c .
I " , 'I} I \ 'CO'J'" "!'> I
: \~,I' \ " '~", I
I I \:/" I "". "<{i! I
I li!7' I' I \""
'ill gl \ ! " I
I l z l---------~,,---L,' ~
o . "~ai' PA>:K .
~" ~
:: i (Ard." Hill.) I
I ~ rf"..-.D i~-\
i I: __,~,~.\ .-
, Z I ,-===- .. ~'l I, I
:.-.~ -"--
I r ,---:-:'--~:::.-'-- ,--1'1'
r~:--=---' L..-,
L,
I ' \
\)1." J HAN'" "
I I ~~'~l;I'!!ll!jl
~~.., .,.......,...,..,
I' I~~UN!Y '0, E ..~1i!illlrljlllllillllrlllillililllllill'liill~!t!~:rIliil~
fI i~ 1000' SCHMIDT .-COUNTY PARK
RAMSEY COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
I
-~ - 'I
I
'If R "CH"", _, -.
"0'""'0 _ ,
O"'RC,""OO __' I
"~'CH _''- I
~--t J
'1- \. FAA"- I 1
" ----- e.oUNDr<<,~
//- 'I I
J
-~- I I
/- ,
~- ~"-,- \ ,p ='"~- J
'-- "'''' ,"'" __+M"~ /;, I
.."~ '\ --/ - ~r I
\ ~/
1 ....-: /
\ / / ~ ,
\ \ /':> /" -t;e;:vf.'i' I I
\ \ ~HJT
\ "-;'-".:/ / I .-I
) ---"~ ..
_.._-~=- /
- / I
rf'J r /'
~~ ~}_,_."I."c===:.:-__,-"-
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
1- PxH I CHI' C. I~
I June 12, 1996
~
Brian Fitsinger - City Administrator r', r- ;'-, r: ; \ f C: f"":
Kevin Ringwald - Community Development Director f"\ c.:' " "
I David W, Kriesel - Building Official ., 'y9t-
City of Arden Hills JUf\ "1 ,j ;. -'
1450 West Highway 96 l ~]': :: i _ 'L \ ' l i'i\\.\..'--
I Arden Hills, .MN 55112-5794
Appeal to Letter dated April 19, 1996 - Prohibited Fencing
Re:
I Mr. Fitsinger:
Mr. Ringwald:
I Mr, Kriesel:
This letter is an appeal to the findings stated in Mr, Kriesel's letter dated April 19, 1996, A copy
I is attached for your review,
Prior to the construction of our deck and fence, my wife and I had surveyed the neighborhood
I quite extensively in order to view different designs and styles and to conform with existing
structures,
Ie I can identify at least four properties with fences constructed the same or similar to mine,
You will find a fence located at 13 17 Karth Lake Circle, in total disrepair, of which the finished
I side does not face the abutting property nor does it comply with the 30% air flow criteria
There exists another fence located at 1330 Amble Road and again the finished side of the fence
I does not face the abutting property and does f10t meet the 30% air flow requirement.
I Yet another fence, located at 1575 Roval Hills Dr, does not have the finished side facing the
abutting property f10r does it comply with the 30% air flow stipulation,
I There is a new fence, constructed within the last month. located at 1600 Lake Johanna Blvd that
does not conform to the Zoning Code as described by Mr. Kriesel.
I I am not a code enforcement officer, yet I noticed the above fences on just one trip to the grocery
store and on ofle trip to work.
I I fail to understand what validates these fences and not mine,
I am confident, with little effort, I could locate dozens of fences in Arden Hills as described
I above. Therefore, I can not, I will f1ot, be singled out for this unreasonable and unwarranted
complaint.
t'
I
7-fJ -I
The Laws, Building Codes, Zoning Codes of my community must apply to all that they claim I
to serve and protect or they applv to no one. Anything less might be construed as harassment. -.
I appeal to your sense of logic, reason and insight.
When I built my house in 1984, built my deck and fence a couple of years after that and until less I
than a year ago, the abutting property, to the east, was nothing but a field of overgrown noxious
weeds and debris, People were dumping brush, grass clippings, sod, rock, sand, concrete, I
asphalt, to name just a few items, on that property,
Also. it is my understanding that property was classified as acreage until recently, I
Now that I think about it, both my wife and I have complained several times over the years, with
little or no response, about the noxious weeds and overgrown brush on the abutting Dropertv to I
the south of ours, Ironically, that property is the responsibility of, and owned by, the City of
Arden Hills, However, that is a code violation which we can address at another time,
In conversations with the abutting property owners to the east, John & Ester McClung, over the I
12 years that I have lived in my house, they have never indicated when or el'en if they were ever
going to develop that property, Be assured we had asked them many, many times over the years, I
When I was building my fence, and after its completion, the McClungs, had no objections to it
and, in fact, complimented us on how nice it looked, We have received several compliments from ~
non,abutting neighbors as well,
My fence is well constructed, well maintained, with a neat, clean appearance, By changing it, as I
Mr. Kriesel suggests, would only degrade that effect.
Ifneed be, I will meet with all or any of you, on site, to discuss this further I
In conclusion, 1 can see no logical, rational or sensible purpose in disturbing this long existing I
structure,
Your attention to this appeal is appreciated, I
I f; .'
t;:'(;(ltllL
Y1i1tt I
Michael A. Welsh I
1509 Colleen Avenue
ArdenHills,MN 55112 I
attachment ..
I
I ]17
I CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
1450 WEST HIGHWAY 96
,. ARDEN HILLS, MN 55112-5794
I April 19, 1996
I Ms. Francesca Welsh
1509 Colleen Avenue
I Arden Hills, !vfN 55112
Re: Prohibited Fencing
I Dear Ms, Welsh:
I On the receipt of complants I inspected the privacy fence located on the East and South
property lines of 1509 Colleen Avenue, The Zoning Code requires that the finished side of all
fencing shall face the abutting property and privacy fencing shall be 30% open for air flow,
I Your fence does not comply with these requirements and should be corrected, A inexpensive
correction woul,d be to remove every other fence slat and renail it on the opposite side of the
.. fence, This would place the finished side toward your neighbors and bring the fence in
compliance for air flow,
I The time to correct this violation of City Code is 60 days from the date of this letter,
Sincerely.
I c!?~~
I David W, Kriesel
Building Official
I cc: Kevin Ringwald, Community Development Director
I
RECEIVED APR 2 0 1996
I
I
~
I PHONE: 16121 633,5676 . FAX (6121 633-7839
I
I CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
{t MEMORANDUM
DATE: July 26,1996
I
TO: Brian Fritsinger, City Administrator
I FROM: Terrance Post, City Accountant @
SUBJECT: Special Assessment Pending Litigation
I 1628 Chatham Avenue (PIN 28-30-23-41-0007)
I Background
At the Special Council Meeting of July 15, 1996, the Arden Hills City Council upheld the
I previously adopted special assessment of $2,232,39 on the above referenced property, The
previous action to adopt is represented by Resolution No, 96-34A passed on June 10, 1996, As a
result of the Council action on July 15, 1996, the property owner, Gene Schmidt, served notice of
I his intent to file an appeal in Ramsey County District Court on July 17, 1996, The property owner
then had ten (10) days, or until July 27,1996, to file his case with the Clerk of Court,
Ie Settlement Discussions
Due to both Jerry Filla and yourself being out of town this week, attorney John Miller and myself
have attempted to advance negotiations with Mr, Schmidt on this matter,
I While initial contact was less than promising (see JMM 7119/96 letter to TRP on subject),
eventually a dialogue between the two parties was begun,
I On Tuesday, July 23, 19961 extended an offer to settle, before Court filing, for 90% of the adopted
assessment or $2009,15 - a reduction of$233,24, Mr, Schmidt rejected this offer and countered
I with an offer to settle at 80% of the adopted assessment or $1,785,91 - a reduction of $446.46,
On Wednesday, July 24, 1996 I telephoned Mr, Schmidt to give the following statement: "Based
I on the informal canvassing done, it appears that a majority of those councilmembers in attendance
at the 7/29/96 Council Meeting would be supportive of accepting your most recent settlement
offer", I specifically made no representations as to Council actions and emphasized that the
I decision to file with the Clerk of Court by July 27, 1996 was a decision he would have to make,
Council Action
I Council may wish, at a July 29, 1996 executive session, to formally direct staff to pursue a
settlement in this matter with the property owner,
I
..
I
--- ---