Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 01-03-1990_MINUT;�iS'fTF'THE ARDEN HTLLS REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING WEDNE�AY,',JRN[1tiRY 3; 1990, 1:30 P.M. - CITY HALL CALL TD pRAER . Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Chairman Probst called the meeting tv'order:at 7:30 p.m. RflLL CALL '- The ro11 being called Che foilnwing membars werx present: • Chairman Dennis Probsi; Members.Dave CaYlson, Beter Martin, Raymond McGraw, Scott Petersen, Barbara Piotrowski and Robert Wdndburn. Absent:.Membe.Ys: Dan Ashbach, Jeanne Winiecki, 17orothy Zehm and Rohert Curtis. ALso present::-$lanner Joh�1 Bergly and Deputy C1erk Catherine Iago. APPROV� M3NUTE5 Chairmaa ProbsC referzed to page 3, paragraph I, 03 the. � 12/6/84 minutes and;noted xhe last sentence should be ao�rect�d as only the spu[herly..:access drive�ay of the Roberts dedelnpmen.i oa Lexington Avenue is aligned with the proposed;access to the Target development in Skoraview. Carlson moved•, secqnfied::by Martin, chat Che DecemLer 6,... I981 P�anning Commission minutes be approved as.:oorrected. Motion carried ucEanimously. (7-0) Pil$I.IC 'FIEARING CASE 1189=20; SUP Chairman Probs€ opaned the Public.fiearing at i:3� p.m. SA2ELT,ITE ANTENNA to consider ttie aFpliaatian Eo"r a_`Speeia7.Use Permi.t Lo - 444�a &OUND LK. RD, allow a 6-ft. diametea:satellfte?dish.anEenna:at W.W. W.GI. GR4IINGERS Graingers� ;4444 Routid�l.ake Road Wes$. Deputy:;Clerk Iago verified publicati_an af the.NoCice of Hearing.in.the N�e �w- BriAh�on.Bulletin on_November Z2, 19$9 acid:�ai3ing to t68 affecCed pYoperCy" '- owners'� il/22/89.and 12/22/89. + Planne� $e�gly briefly referred to his repart dated 12/fi%89 anfl.dbsplayed a,. diagr�m.witkt three possible:.Iocations for CHe'proposed d�sh aricenn8; onrt loC�tidY� being-.a..rcof-tnount on the building, the oYher tWo::locafions silown,3Ye gxound locat�pna..:-Be�gly explained fhelapplicant had.chosen ats alternate`lq�ation fbr. the a�ltenna;which is a ground mounted lae�atioa on tha•saveh s,i$a of'EhP.:tuilding.-,. and aC t.ha-: top of a' steep slope. The Planner -.Yiidicated :a ptefei3ls�e �oc �ian, ac'•, th� sauCh=si,de of the huilding placed at the bat:tom of Chis.slopee:�e expSafn�d. this ���ferable location was discussed with the:applicant-and:ite¢��d'noC'appaan',' : there were any objections:to the antenna plaeement'at ¢he bbCtom.:-nfatiitie..sYape:..' The Planner"advised he had.;reviewed the site fram the eas.�,snda oS;lRoasttd:lske,,g�;i discus:s�d ;tty Member Winiecki. It is 'his 'o6servativtt thG aatenna skn�ldr:rtot b� visible _frbm the residenCial :properries on the east side of'..th� 1�TLc�, .Be.ig1� noted thare:is no parki�g tciaChe rear o£ this si[e:; as �arevipu�l�f�i�dtc3Csii by . Member .k'#.ztiecki, and that the building is sethack'£irrthes frora th�; xake -Lhati other builflings in the are:a. Iia:zeferr�3 ro hisoregitsrt -�f .i2-�6-81, recemntand�Ylg .- approva� of the SUP be contitl�e�tC.upon sc.zeening�o:E'yha'atz'tenna;. �e.the_ it 1S' .` roof or::ground mounted. : . There wa$ discussion relative to the.size of the.dish an�,�Che p�opos�ed locatioH�. The Plartner sCated he was un.sure why the"ap�slicat)C is p.rdp,o�tsxg tN�:_b-fx. "dS4kt rathez Chan a`smaller size. He noCed the.ground mounCed.:locati.ort=3Haryn 8t cha botto� pf';;the'steep slope would limi.t the �amounC o� �es�eisi�ng •o£, :Gh@' �antenna, �Bergl�i exglained the appli.cant preferred Che roo€-maw.nt�rT:locaCio� � r'�'�xp�,ained s the roGf uactqted dfsh was less susceprible t.o vandali�id artd raq�sirc�a ;ssa maintenarc.c.e...:r Chai.rman krebsti'noced the agplica�rx was noG`pr�s¢nt. "He a&kp� if there ci8g anyattB,,, . present whryrwished to.�be hear.d regaidirtg ehi's m�tt¢r. TheTe.cpas no _espanse.,: Gha�rmxx� :Prob'st c1;osQd the public hearittg at Z•45 p.m. �inutes of the Arden Hills Regular Planning Commission Meeting, 1-3-90 Page 2 • CASE 1�89-20 (Cont'd) Member Woodburn questioned how high the antenna would protrude above the roof-line of the building. Bergly stated it would be approximately 7 or 8 ft. above the roof. Chairman Probst asked for comments from the members relative to which location would be preferable for the antenna. Woodburn stated the site may appear less cluttered if the antenna is mounted on the roof. McGraw commented the antenna should be properly screened; the location was not as important as proper screening of the antenna. Martin commented that a roof-mounted antenna may be difficult to screen; questioned if the antenna will be visible from Highway 96. Planner Bergly stated he did not believe the antenna would be visible from Highway 96 except from the bridge. Petersen questioned what type of screening could be required. Bergly stated the Commission may recommend the specific type of screening by landscaping or other methods if a roof-mounted antenna is specified as desirable. He explained if Commission requires screening on a11 four sides of the antenna it would preclude locating the antenna on the roof. There was discussion regarding other sites in this area and if this antenna location will set a precedent. � The Planner stated he was not aware of any other dish antennae in this area; one community he surveyed requires all dishes over 3 ft. be ground-mounCed. He noted the Commission has discussion requirements for dishes relative to setbacks no closer than the building setback and screening of the antenna. Chairman Probst commented it may be preferable to locate the antenna on the �round and provide further amenities on the site by landscaping. Planner Bergly agreed and noted the roof mount would require an "artificial" type of screening for the antenna rather than adding an amenity to the site with landscaping for screening purposes. Petersen moved, seconded by Woodburn, that Commission recommend to council approval of Case 1�89-20, a Special Use Permit to allow a six-foot satellite antenna at 4444 Round Lake Road West, W.W. Graingers, to be located in the diagram provided by Planner Bergly as the preferable location in his report dated 12-6-89, contingent upon: l. The submission of detailed plans illustrating the dish will not be visible from properties or from public streets and highways, and 2. The plans to show how landscaping, for screening purposes, wi L1 be installed to effectively eliminate view of the dish, such plafls to �e approved by the Planner. Motion carried unanimously. (7-0) UNDEVELOPED LAND Planner Bergly referred Commissio� to the "U.fldevelop;ed DECEMBER 1989 Land Map" which is prepared annually for revi�w. �e �oted the primary purpose of the map was for the park Committee to better estimate the potential for future park dedication land and it is als:o used by potential developers to determine possible development sites. htinutes of €he Arden Hills Regular Planning Commission Meeting, 1-3-90 I'age 3 r _..1 U �J LAND MAP (Cont'd) Sergly noted the map identifies land development activity in 1989. He explained that this year the systems statement from the Metropolitan Council requires cities to estimate what the undeveloped land in the city could produce in terms of traffic generation, population and employment. Commission discussed areas on the map for possible residential development if lot combinations were obtained; also discussed was the possibility of development of wetland areas. No formal action taken on this matter. SUBCOMh1ITTEE REPORTS Chairman Probst reported to Commission on Council action relative to the list of study items for subcommittees. He explained Council was receptive to all six items listed and the only recommended change was the priority of items Ill Round Lake Business District and �12 Lexington Avenue Study. Probst advised that Council concurred the Lexington Avenue study should be placed as ill on the list. He noted Council authorized an expenditure not to exceed $10,000.00 for the Planner to begin his review of the Lexington Avenue area, between I-694 and County Road E, as relates to alternate access, traffic issues and development/redevelopment. Member McGraw reported on the Arsenal Study subcommittee activities. He read s.ubcommittee correspondence sent to Representative Bruce Vento and correspondence se,t ::cm Ver.to's office to Ted Shulte at TCAAP. McGraw advised the subcommittee will report to Commission upon receipt of further correspondence from Vento or Shulte. Member Petersen had no report on the Wetlands Study subcommittee. Member Piotrowski had no report on the Zoning Code Study subcommittee. PSember Woodburn noted the Park Dedication requirements may have to be amended in fhe event the Zoning Code requirements for platting are revised. COUNCIL REPORT ADJOURN Chairman Probst and Deputy Clerk Iago reported on Council actions relative to items of interest to the Co�nission. Petersen moved, seconded by Martin,-that the meeting be adjourned at 8:15 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. (7-0) Dennis Probst, Chair �