The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPCP 09-07-2005 Cbair ~ 1245 W. Highway % David Saod , Commissioners ~HILLS Ardeo Dills, MN 55112 Keo Bezdicek 651.634.5120 Clay too Larsoo Arden Hills www.ci.arden-hills.mn.ns Dave McCluog Planning Commission Liz Modesette Roberta Tbompsoo Wednesda , Se tember 7, 2005 CIa ton Zimmerman City Vision A strong community that values our unique environment, our fiscal soundness, and our tradition as a desirable city in whicb to live, work, and lay. Agenda Planning Commission Convenes 7:00 PM Call to Order 1. AGENDA 2. MINUTES A. August 3, 2005 Meeting 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Planning Case 05-19: Richard Kotoski and Kim Bryson d/b/a Bryson Woods, 2233 Dellwood Street, Roseville, MN; Preliminary Plat (1978 Thorn Drive). B. Planning Case 05-20: Paul Ruppel, 154] Millpond Ct., Chaska, MN; Five-foot Side Yard Setback Variance for a Detached Garage (1911 G]enpaul Avenue). C. Planning Case 05-07: City of Arden Hills, 1245 W. Highway 96; Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment (Covered Front Porch Regulations). 4. UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS 5. REPORTS 6. ADJOURNMENT A quorum of the City Council may be present at this meeting. ~- D ro.-t='..\- MINUTES CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION . WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 3, 2005 7:00 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY HALL CALL TO ORDER Chair Sand called the meeting to order at 7:08 p.m. ROLLCALL Present were Commissioners Clayton Larson, Elizabeth Modesette, Roberta Thompson, David McClung, and Chair David Sand. Absent: Commissioners Ken Bezdicek and Clayton Zimmerman, Also present were Mayor Beverly Aplikowski, City Planner Peter Hellegers, and Recording Secretary Kathleen Altman, A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JULY 6. 2005. Commissioner Larson moved, seconded by Commissioner Thompson to approve the July e 6, 2005 minutes as amended. Thc motion carried unanimously (5-0). PUBLIC HEARINGS None, UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS A. PLANNING CASE 05-18: WILLIAM MITCHELL, 3568 RIDGEWOOD COURT, ARDEN HILLS, MN 55112; MINOR SUBDIVISION AND LOT CONSOLIDATION ML Hellegers stated applicant was requesting a Minor Subdivision and Lot Consolidation. He reviewed his analysis and recommended the Commission approve the Minor Subdivision/Lot Consolidation William Mitchell, after making a finding that the proposed subdivision meets City standards and will not have an adverse impact on the surrounding properties or on the eommunity as a whole; subject to the following condition: L Rccording with Ramsey County, The applicant shall file the minor subdivision and lot consolidation with the Ramsey County recorder and shall provide the city with a e recorded copy. Commissioner Larson asked why the lot was divided in this manner because it created a diffieult property description whereas if it was cut in half there would be an easier property description. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION -AUGUST 3, 2005 2 Mr. Hellegers replied this was done because of the driveway location and to preserve the site line. . Chair Saud asked if there was anything in the topography itself that ereated this triangle. He asked ifthere were trees in the site line, so the trees could be taken down to improve the site line. Mr. Hellegers responded the owner of these properties was looking to sell and would sell this as one lot and the owner to the north would enjoy the same site line. In terms of existing topography, the area to the west had a steep slope with retaining walls on the south comer. He noted currently as the property sits, the way the subdivision was configured would create a lot more spaee for the house to the north and leave plenty of space for Mr. Mitchell's property. Also, because of the subdivision adding space the house to the north would go from nonconforming to having plenty of a setback cushion. Commissioner McClung asked if there was anything in the Code to handle this issue administratively because it was a minor issue. Mr. Hellegers stated there was not Commissioner McClung suggested they discuss at some future point issues sueh as this being approved administratively instead of having to come to the Phnming Commission and Council. Commissioner Larson moved, seconded by Commissioner Modesette to approve Planning Case #05-18, William Mitchell, 3568 Ridgewood Court, Minor Subdivision/Lot Consolidation, along with moving the finding that the proposed subdivision meets the City standards and will not have an adverse impact on the surrounding properties or the community as a whole, and subject to the condition as noted in staff s August 3, 2005 report. e The motion carried unanimously (5-0). REPORTS A. Planning Commissioners None. B. Staff None. C. Council Member Mayor Aplikowski updated the Commission on recent City Council actions. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Larson moved, seconded by Commissioner Thompson to adjourn the meeting at 7:38 p.m. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). . , , ~ . ~~HILLS MEMORANDUM DATE: September 7,2005 PC Agenda Item 3.A TO: Planning Commission FROM: Peter Hellegers, City Planncr E!L- SUBJECT: PC #05-] 9, Richard Kotoski and Kim Bryson d/b/a Bryson Woods 1978 Thorn Drive Preliminary Plat Requested Action Considcr the requested Preliminary Plat Baek!!round Surrounding Area . R-2: Single and Two Family Single Family Detached North Low Density Residential Residential Residential ._,-~--- H.' ____ _._~_____.__'~~ ~w_______.._ _...._~ ,. -~----~- -~- South Railroad Railroad Railroad Ri ht-of-Wa Right-of-Way Right-of-Way East Low Density Residential R-2: Single and Two Family Single Family Detached Residential Residential --.- -.- West Low Density Residential R-2: Single and Two Family Single Family Detached Residential Residential Site Data Low Density Residential Single Family Residential R-2: Single and Two Family Residential 1.32 acres (57,620 square feet) Slopes downward from east to west toward Siems Court. Qverview The applicant is proposing to subdivide the cxisting lot at 1978 Thorn Drive, originally platted as Lot #20 under the Rohleder's Home and Garden Acres Plat of 1938, into thrce single family lots. \\NIetm-inel.us\ArdenHilIs\Planning\PJanning Cases\2005\05-19 Blyson Woods Preliminary Plat (PENDlNG)\09-07-05 PC Rcpori Bryson Woods Preliminary Plat PC-05-] 9_doc . Page 1 of5 All of the proposed lots would meet the minimum area for lots in the R-2: Single and Two Family Residential Zoning District . Preliminarv Plat Review 1. Lots. Lots 1,2, and 3 exceed code rcquirements in terms oflot width, depth, and area with the exception of the rear dimension of Lot 3 and thc depth at the point of triangular Lot I. 2. Minimum Lot Depth. The Zoning Ordinance in Section Y, F, 3, states that the minimum lot dcpth in the R-2: Single and Two Family Residential Zoning District shall be at least 120 feet The depth of Lot I is 0 feet at the point of this triangular Jot However, this difference can be attributed to the City Code contemplating mostly rectangular lots for requircd dimensions, those standard requircd dimensions eause triangular lots to require variances. Lots Required Lot Depth Provided Lot Depth Lot I ]20 feet o feet (up to ]44_97 feet) _ _ (Ofeet at the point of the triangle) Lot 2 120 feet 144.97 Lot 3 ]20 feet 201.96 3. Minimum Lot Width. The Zoning Ordinance in Section Y, F, 3, states that the minimum lot width in the R-2: Single and Two Family Residential Zoning District shall . be at least 85 feet The rear of Lot 3 narrows to 47.96 feet with a frontage of22533 feet However with the lots shaped this way thc property lines are perpendicular to Thorn Drive which would make thc building cnvelopcs more consistent with the typical arrangement of propcrty throughout the City. -. ---- Lots gequired Lot Width Provided Lot Width ---- - -- ------ ------ Lot I 85 feet 205 feet Lot 2 85 feet 85 feet Lot3 85 feet 47_96 feet -- 4. Setbacks. It appcars that all of the lots will have adcquate space to construct within the eonfines of the City's setback regulations_ The most diftlcult lot from a setback perspcctive is Lot 1 which has a nanow buildable area due to the triangular configuration of the lot Setbacks f()r principle buildings are shown on the attached drawings (marked as SBL [setback line] on the drawing)_ S. Easements. City subdivision regulations rcquire easements at least twelve (12) feet wide centered on lot lines for utilities and shall be dedicated to the City_ Additionally, drainage and utility easements are also provided on the plat In particular, the area at the \\Mctm-inet,us\ArdenHills\Planning\Planning Cases'2005\OS-19 Bryson Woods PreliminaJY Plat {PENDING)\09-07-05 PC Report Bryson Woods PreJimirlilry Pial rC-05.-19.doc . Page 2 oj'S northeast corner of Lot 3 includes some wetland that is within a drainage and utility easement. However, it should be noted that the City will not assume responsibility for . maintenance of these areas. Rather, the easements will allow access if it is ever necessary to enter these areas. 6. Grading. The property eUITently has a much higher elevation at the western end, near the tip of proposed Lot 1, and slopes downward to the east. The thirty foot grade change would likely result in some fill or grading for development of the properties. Grading would also be evaluated in conjunction with any future building permits for the property. 7. Utilities. Utilities would be brought in to the propel1ies through the drainage and utility easements. Our Operations and Maintenanec department has noted that the water and sewer mains will havc to bc tapped to supply service to thc extra lots. TIle developer is responsible for the cost and installation of utilities to the propeJ1ies. Work on utilities within the City right-of~way will require approval from the City.s Operations and Maintenance department. 8. Access I Street Design. The property is served by the existing Thom Drive. New driveway aecesses would be required for all three properties. Since this is a ncighborhood street with minimal traffic, the accesses should not be a problem. 9. Park Dedication. Since the property was previously platted as one lot, and the subdivision of the property would create three lots, park dedication would be required. The City Codc discusses subdivision ohesidential properties of two to three units per . acre at a park dedication figure of approximately 7% of the filir market value of the property. A condition is included in the recommendation requiring the applicant to satisfy the park dedication requirement as approved by the City Council. 10. Existing Structures. The existing housc, garage, and drivcway would need to be removed or demolished prior to any new development of the property. Demolition work would require the issuance of a City Demolition Permit. 11. Subdivision Variances. ll1e Subdivision chapter of the City Code allows the City Council to approve variances from the regulations of that chapter based on a finding that the following conditions exist: . The hardship is not a mere ineonvenienee; . The condition or conditions upon which the request is based are unique and not generally applieable to other property; . The granting of a variance will not bc substantially dctrimental to the public welfare and is in accord with the purposc and intcnt of the chapter, the zoning ordinance and the comprehensive plan. \\Mctro-inet.us\ArdellHills\.Pbnnillg\Planning Ca,;es\1005\05-19 Bryson Woods Preliminary Plat (PEN0ING)\09-07-0S PC Report Btyson Woods Preliminary Pbl PC-05-19.doc . Page 3 of5 In making these findings, the City Council shall consider the naturc of the proposed use of land and the existing use ofIand in the vicinity, the number of persons to reside or . work in the proposed subdivision and the probable effect of the proposed snbdivision upon traffic conditions in the vicinity. In granting a variance as provided in this section, the Couneil shall prescribe only such conditions that it determines dcsirable or necessary to the pub lie interest (Scction 1150.01). 12. Additional Plan Review Comments - Plan review comments receivedfrom City staff, and the City Engineer A. Our Operations and Maintenance department has noted that the water and sewer mains will have to be tapped to supply serviee to the extra lots. The dcvelopcr is responsible for the cost and installation of utilities to the properties. Work on utilities within the City right-of-way will require approval from the City's Operations and Maintenance department. Staff Recommendation In Planning Case #05-19 staff recommends approval of the Preliminary Plat for the Bryson Woods development, after making a finding that the proposed variances are not merely inconveniences, the conditions upon which the variances are based are unique to the property, and the variances will not be substantially detrimental to the public welfare and are in concert with City regulations; subject to the following conditions: . A. Recording with Ramsey County. The applicant shall file the Final Plat with the Ramsey County recorder and shall provide the City with a recorded copy. B. Compliancc with the City Code. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City Code and related ordinanccs. C. Park Dedication. Satisfaction of thc park dedication rcquirement as approved by the City Council. D. Necessary Approvals from Other Agencies. The applicant shall obtain all necessary permits from the Riee Creek Watershed District, Ramsey County, the State of Minnesota Departmcnt of Natural Resources and any other governing agencies where applicable. Options I. Recommend approval as submitted. L Recommend approval with conditions. 3. Recommend denial with reasons for denial. If the City denies the petitioners request, "...it must state in writing the reasons for the denial at the time it denies the request!' 4. Table for additional information. Deadline for Agencv Actions - October 7, 2005 \\Metro-incl_us\ArdenHills\Planning\Pbnning Cases\2005\05-19 Bryson Woods PrelimillalY Plat (PI:::NlJIN(j)'\09-07-05 PC Report Blyson Woods Preliminary Plat PC-05-] 9.doc . Page 4 of 5 The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on August 8, 2005 Pursuant to Minnesota State Statue, the City must act on this request by October 7, 2005 (60 . days), unless the city provides the petitioner with written reasons for and additional 60 day review period. The City may with the petitioners' consent extcnd the review period beyond the 120 days. Attachments 3a-l Location Map, other peltinent maps 3a-2 Plans and statement of rcquest submitted by the applicant . \\Metro-int-i..us\ArdcnHilJs\Planning\Pbnning Cases\2005\05-19 Bryson Woods Preliminary Plat {PENDING)\09-07-05 PC Report I3ryson Woods Preliminary Plat PC-05-19.doc . Page 50f5 Planning Commission Meeting September 7, 2005 . Attachment 3a - 1 . . <Iz ~ 'D ill lL o o o ~ o (:::::> 0 c; l[) L[) ............... II ....................................................................................................... . . ... .. . "_d, ' , _ H ,,__ .'- ,- ,.,-.-,...-......-.- ~ lD C) l.............~..................................'" .-.............. - 0 ~(j) 1I]d........... 0 '.', '<'-:'::':"'<::'::.-'- 0 . ........ ... ......:.'., :.................:: -.::.................. ..... . L[) "H " .............. """" ",," . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . .. . . ..:.;'.....:..::<...................:.'....>...:.':.>............................... , - ... ~ ~....... . . .. .... - .... """". . ........... ..................... . .' .." ,-.,-" "". ,. - . .... . - , " ~-~ MSS-I ~ ...1.....:.... ! .......... .. ............................. .......... c. l' ...... .... ....n l' g i . :, ,'_ - :::::::.: '::<:: ::::::::: <:-'>:<::-'~<" ---",:.:":,"', :: ,-' ('.I ---- --- ."" """ .. ___ ..'" 'H" . .....,... ~ m ~ " L " ~ ,~l .. ~ . jiiiiiiiiE. ~ t ~ " " O <> ' (.-) ::!: ," Cow m " ~ M..... ~ ~ . =-. (') " .' ~ co >- . ~ - " c " ~ - E! 0 ~ ,~ () - ~ " ." n ID _ ~ .:2 ~ ! ~ 0 ;;: ; ~ . ...J ~ : ~ , , '" - . " , , :"'.., , .. . . . ....;,1it.,k~~lii?2ilijf~~~"~\ -iRO. ..H'l. ED.ER..5....~i,t(.~i~m.w~d-l~. 'e~.10.~)7' .'. . .<:,!:f;'~ f71 fb I.!.I ~:;:':'" ..... .R0~)jIX15E );: ~~" ,~.,,;j, '~~~;~'~f!; .......,., "-131B.G.h.. .:'.I~O/'f MON"...>/ ,. " ,",,'; " HO'K,!>.".", - . .. ~'~.'I:,~1t-;~."... . i ~ .~ '"e,"f.r':.;...-t... \', "r ~W'/4 ~rc ... >-41.., ~ "1M. "" "'''C>- .'ilf ~,,!' _'. ra,T-30'/i,';1:.t3-W ~.... ?Ie'''' l '.. ; Z <1S~... ; ~... <~ \\ _.ti.... !o4lJ..,., 430 't . ~..~ .~. ~ jy "'.. ms.u \~"4!.- ~'lI'I -- ... 4 oJf-~,~ .. . '\. In!!>.), :- ~ \ 5 ~ '" \ IUS.-, .. 1"- 'G "':""0 . >>_tic( .. 'J~~ '" 1>_ .,. '7 ~Cl< ~ , . 1:: 121'.5.4/1' '8 Z~.5 ! 8 _ '1 ltlS.~, . - (ll -, S ~ ),,_ l..,. /tZ!rZ, 10 '~ 11 .111""1' '0 !It - -'.....: U .lI . IUs..., ~ ~ /~ 12 ~ .' Itt-f.'3:! '-1 100 100 10<:1 ,i' "4.~ ... ,4~' I~ ~ "I .."".... t"t',..) 9 - .~ . "IJ)'J \D ~# on 4 No .. ;,-. .... ..,. :J :; ~ I ;e :; ~ ; ~ 3 s : : ~ .. '" ~ 15 . ".. 201 30 t9 l8 l7. ~ I~ .q; ~H " . t~ 17 ~ ~ Po. P '26 ~ t ~ ~ '0'" 100" lOa <1,-, Ie <,!HOH D"v< ~ ~ .. ~,.:_ ,_,:". .0. '-'.,'''' "" .C..... .......~.. ...: ~"'43 ,! l!> u. ".p..T' p . ''''''~...,..._. Z ~ 4Z 32o! ~ . .4 . . """'. ". '_ :'i . & "., ......... :_c..' ,',. ,",.,,,,,,, k.I j 41 ~4 0 0 } Zc. '-_"'~'''_'_'' ".';'~i'::~ .'.. :.,d: ~""II. i:i '~,." ./.,.,_, '>:. .. d! 40 ZZ .,. 4UIlltl ! ~ ~ ,~ g..,.<f38 I ~.~. . ~!j,.. _& .,.- . N.'54 ~TO"E MON,.. 1315 ~ .. .._. :>WCO!? ~Ec.za ";;......; >"" T-~.ti.R'~~'W. ;.;'~ 5e^1.l!. - \'.. ~oo.,;;"~: EERING CO. . '.:'.'<.>"."":'"''''';'~'<;;<'.>I.':;: .B.~;~t~.rE~. ENGIN w~~g:~~t.".:t.j;;;,\i1~~';~f.~~;~i~i!t;ii~lM.1;\'::':'flt",\il<l; ,,~,r.:. MrNN~loT A, " ,\).,.... :,~;:r.\.,..>,_.;.:.,;.;,.,... . ',.. .. - --.---. .---.. _. ._. u__ .. _~... '_.~'_.. ,',; --_._.~--~._----------- . -------- I f "" "0' ~ E , Ii : i ~ E";;: '" '-" {;., 'l~ t ~ I '1> " :;; INw ~~g ~ 0 u ~ _ 0,-" } '" i' ~ ~~ ~ ,~ oJ I ~ "- ] ,~gB ~ ~ -'" ,,~~ ~~ ~- ~ 0 :0 " " :.; ~<r ~ ,,'> ~*l; 1" ~~ .~ ; Ii z CIJ t (5 i~o~_i ~ ~ g ~i~ ~ . J ~ ~ , , en 'I "e, h",' ,,' 1 U . I C .,- -0'" :; E,o "'''' a ~ { ~~~ 11 ~z .. o . - Q ~.~~ ~~~~~. _~ { j ~~;. d u- : i o 0 N -".. ~ .,..,'1> C" D ~~'" z []~ z~ - +-' f'... E. t-') to )j~2 Lh b 2" ~ ~ g ~:l'~ g...!!! j D '" n 0 <ll 0 --:;o::t'<j- ..a.. 0"::; ~~_ll.", "''' >":0 ~; Ill> .. ~ LL ~'?U) muuJr<) ~~ :>-!'!"- 80"-:/'" .'8 '1> :;; !~~ ;-.. ~ A" -'. O ..<Xl ""':;""r.O -;;: OU)Q) ~"'" o;:~,,::; ;i2 8 '" &~~ ~ ~'" ! ~ ~ ,_ c (I) l!) l 0 0 I ~:ii.:g :\':'" E '; _~:: == ~ c t:~ ~ [J ~ )<; >., ::> o~ 0""',,, 00:=" l (/.l cO "~, "'," "' 2 l' "I., m~ g L :::::>- .12::5\{10ZCO 200 N 11...1 w ~.." 10"'0" 0'-''''' ~,:; ~~" ~ ..; m .>....... ~o~v ':-'?5-?;- _f'-.. ~... ... 1.0 f-- ~gE.;:;:;~t!o'-- ~-;:: ~ :to _]p~ IU U o '+- -o~rn~~ I 6, L:.~ I \.L ~~~ 0 g<):;~e.~:n~t,',:E ,.~o~ O -g_ >-.Q) Q):D "Qi-0 60;2 ~ z 'g1i~_,,~C;.'3~N'Z~-~~~g.:~ C Z (j) OLO:=<.O <J) Ou Cl.." 8""o~O~~~>.~"'fir"'''~.!L''' 0- ~Z~I") iD OW(D ~ ;~~;~~g~~oI;~~~~t 3 C 0 () En (f)-=-: ~ E~ c'. "'~". " o"...~..,,,,,",,,~s 0 C (f)._._N 0 0) 0,..-0;. ,"~~i707;~5-3-~~2o;::iO->E rr (f) ~O::Y:NO::I-- ~U~-21- ,n:'0C;:;:;?~':'.~~8::.,;>~..'O~'~ 0 u o ill >- ~ j ~;j;~j~jli~II!l;~ ~ ~ L cr:: '-:",n .. <ti 0"--: '" '" w_S ~ CD z~~ o C j=o./):J ~b3 un ">, U} W OJ w__J" OI E 00 :iP:' D::: o ~~b, .Od 05 ,< ----------- -------- --------.., , -------------- ------------ \ , ' , ' " \ 'I'. '.' )- , ..,~"\'. '" OJ'':!' i\ 'i:l,.: ';:;,..' ~ uJ \>i . i \ ".' ."\. - ,:r-.,j''''' <:;; ./ .\01<:",1 a:: o '" . 'L <:foJ-\\<'L"-<;'~'j.-/ ' ,.<g,,>' ,J, S <( ~8~ :,<,~'L;tG--<:f ' .'O$JI.,~\..~',I <( ~ W. ~~ ill ~" . ~i~ ,,> I".my_\. '\ (L W ('n _ 0 '\.,\,.".\ r-- t;; ;;'.!. " ~~'. -,-,-J<'.~ '\~. r- "'\ .\'\. --' 'II',,' 'S\::> ",I I 0 {L 4: K...\",\ Im--:i..<f1 ',. .. \ \ ' ~)\\'.\.'\. '-. Y3y.'. .'. ....\~~"~g L- ,C;'.; - .... :'-,,~~~~~ , ..'., ,.". ...' . 'I II , ~ :z. -l '.':"- ...-...:-",--,-'::1<">1' ('J./ . ( I ~ In '/-.,/ : -' J .2 : (' J "I I I C~ ~-.J , L I " : C'J : / f- I: ------------......'/ z I 1 :~\ '-x-': loJ I I ' ..' 2' I, .' t;{ : \ \ --c 1 " I '" w ~, I VJ I o~o/ \ , ' . \ ' ' ., - , ~ I o c' ,~ " J \ l:: '" ::J 1.1(5 ~ R: \ ~ 7" '5 W Z ld L.. c~ \ .. ---" lfl_---' L..., ~~ ~:; 0 WI_~ Z >--::i2 w }o \ \ r Z0Z0YOQ;::;?; Q;:r-'),o~o N 1 U W <(<(IU:L <[r>- ~.( (]){'.lO '":3''' \ I :;;: '-' :?:Q;: ~_ iji::.:wr:_ 6 O.I~:((J_ ~ -;, I I '" lj ~!2~~6~,~~F:' if) 'n~~..j 8"::3 I I IOl2UJQ::Ltn"::'~ L: ~ .. J , I I~' 8';). . d S' ' - I v; o-w C; 61-' ,C;: '" ~ ~ ! ! ~ / \ " ~ II ~ / \ ~~~ffio, I ~ < _N~ ~ I I f- f-f-f- f- , - ] 0 ooc 0 I I I .--' .--'--1_' r-- \ . , , I -- 'I" i - :'< & """ ~: ~ :; ~ .. _ '" E ~ - '.' ~ .. <n E'S: =mr.j "u ~ ~~ ~~ I" 0 ~ ~ -" J:gw C C <> ~i~ r~ ~: t ~ ~ " ~ "'26 ,1: ~ Ii' Ii 'i"" I ' -+J ' , ;;,~." ~ ..,. "_I" ;-, ~ (j) " <i. o~ r:;- c ~ .. ~~\l. - :; ~ .. O _ .S; E -;0';500'" ~ '" 5! ~!" I" "i~~~ll;1 g O 'i' "~~~ E' ~ 'l<~'" w _ <5 80: ,"'''- 2 ji " l.. - U "I" n 0 _ eN'" _"z~ ,< c .h' ~z " LL *",8 -"';;''2 ,;, ,,0,,- ., : ~ Ii, u- I" O ~ L eo _.~ ' ,- E- . . . ,E . ,. 0 . i __~ _"::,0 m'O"'''' 0'" ~o2"" ".' , "'.' w.'1 ~ . _, .. eo .'" N' > . . ,. >., c'. cVJeo I > 0 '" ." n8~_"" _.\\i ...... io t'- ~i&o"eo", OOz I gz, g",C ,g , : "i' w~ ~ ';, L S ~o ~Oz'" 0"',,;1) VJ ~,D ,,~~p ~. c ". 'i>^,' LE~( ! ~ O 4- ,. _ L 0 " . ~ >, '-l' 0 . '0 Om 3" I c~.,.." ,LI ' " O .0 '" = 0> em I .,' " . 8 C Z J -'" ID oi:n .~ jj ~ '3 '" ',II ,,~ ID ._ VJ:' ~ 0 '" '" ~ 0 8 "-~ . C 0 ~E..ot") ~ o~ g C (O'.~.~~ 2~ ~ ~~ 2~ ._ (j) ~"''''N'''f-. >,u"'" w z Q) >- ~ ~ -~;- ~ L Q:::o c7:.!l ~ 03 n \ <: _ 0" ~ m ~ q "" '" "u 3 j 1 ~. 0 ,> ][ ~ ~:;8 "h. 15 ~ ~ 8. ;; " w ~" _ o6t: . I t <1;' ~ : _ ____0" N01HO'"8 M3N ~" i -------------------- .----. - ---- ,,5 ---- ---~ ~ ~ , , " ' " ~ ' " ,0 ' r- ", ()J DC " ~- (,n ." " '. -~----~- ,;- ('~ r'j C~ ('~ ~ rJ z w " w m - ~ " ..\'" r m ' ~ w:i: 2 ~ n:: ,.- ~ =:> wi:. ~ ~ CJ ~ <\':i Z2 W w t:J ___~,' 0 ,,' o'O~ " "'.',' " z t!~5~6 r~ii' w ,I ~ w ~ 0:::;: iY c;;: I \ (') z;2I< w<~r ^ ~~. 0 o ~ ~~:'i~6~~~'; 6 ~~2 ~ ) 1 OX2~IXW;O::<>:i= ({) tflvr--, '" . '.\' ~u..Vi3:~ ~_N uJ o I " , ~ ' , ~ I ; '-' w I I 1m' : J . , , < ' ! ~ ~)(~6 0 I I j;) ~ j'" .;;; 2m i~ <~,,~~ ' \ J ~ I-~~ ~ j \ I q 000 0 \ : ~~~ ~ \ I, ,,<.'~ ~ . Planning Commission Meeting September 7,2005 e Attachment 3a - 2 . . Shoreview Office . 100 Village Center Drive . North Oaks, MN 55127-3015 651-483.1200 BURNET Fax 651-483-3681 www.cbburnet.com August 22, 2005 To: City of Arden Hills Re: 1978 Thorn Drive We have applied and paid for a permit application through the Rice Creek Watershed District ~ Attached is the documentation we have received. . Our application is currently under review and we will keep you posted of any results or decisions made. Thank you, .- ~ C'"... - ~-..._-' Richard Kotoski ~~~ Kim Bryson , . Owned And Operated By NRT Incorporated. QlB , . - RICIE CRIEIEK W A TIEIRSHIED DISTRICT Notice of Receipt of Permit Application Permit Number: 05-092 Permit Name: Bryson Woods Received: 8{17 {200S Board Action at Meeting on: 9{28{200S The above-referenced permit application is now being reviewed by our office and will be subject to action by the RCWD Board of Managers at their regular meeting on the above 'date unless you are notified that the application is incomplete. Please refer to the attached schedule explaining the application process and pertinent dates. You may make a personal appearance at the Board meeting if you so desire, although it is not necessary for you to appear unless notified by the District. The Board of Managers meets at 7:00 p.m. at the Shoreview City Hall located at 4600 North Victoria Street, Shoreview, MN. The Board of Managers regularly considers permit applications only at their fourth- Wednesday-of-the.month meeting. If you have questions regarding your Application status please contact the District Office to avoid unnecessary delays in receiving a permit. Please refer to the Permit Application Number above on all calls{submittals. If you have any questions, please call the Ken Powell at the District Office, (763) 398-3072 or email him at: , kpowell@ricecreek.org Cc: Dick Kotoski Kim Bryson, CD Burnet 2233 Dellwood Roseville MN 55] 13 , ,. - - . ,. t~ .\ I _ (\ '. 1~:" ,- ,-" ": ' (, , \ Wetland Conservation Act I Replacement Plan Application Processing Note that the processing of wetland replacement plan applications operates separately from the Rice Creek Watershed District permit processing due to State regulations. Projects requiring the approval of a wetland replacement plan applieation will generaJly require more time for processing due to the notieing requirements. Applicants are strongly encouraged to submit wetland delineation reports prior to applying for a permit Permit application proeessing delays can occur if wetland delineations are not approved prior to submittal. The foJlowing procedures will befoJlowed by the Rice Creek Watershed District for all applications involving a wetland replacement plan application. , . Wetland replacement plan applieations will be reviewed for eompleteness and noticed to the required ageneies within 10 working days of receipt Applicants will be informed within 10 working days if the application is not eomplete enough for proeessing. . The eomment period for the replacement plan application wiJl run for 20 days after mailing of the notice unless an extension is granted' due to a request by a member of the Technical Evaluation Panel or the applicant . After the comment period ends, the Technieal Evaluation Panel recommendations (if any) will be incorporated into Engineer's Report for the Rice Creek Watershed District permit application and will be considered at the next applicable Board of Manager's meeting in aecordance with the dDistrict's permit processing procedures. I , . Permit Schedule for September 2005 . September 8- Permit Applieation Deadline. All application materials are due to the District Office by 4:30 pm. September 16- Draft Engineer's Report with staff recommendation to the District Board of Managers faxed to applicants and eonsultants. September 19 - Revised plans and/or additional information aceepted by District Engineer (Emmons & Olivier Resources) until 5pm at their office for Engineer's Reports receiving an incomplete status. September 23- Final Engineer's Report with staffreeommendation to the District Board of Managers faxed to applicants and eonsultants. September 28- Board of Managers Meeting for consideration of all permit applications that are deemed complete by the Engineer's Report. Notes: . Engineer's Report will recommend approval, conditional approval pending ~ receipt of changes (CAPROC), denial, or will be deemed incomplete. . Applications deemed incomplete in the final Engineer's Report before the Board Meeting will not be considered at that meeting. . For applications with a CAPROC status following the Board Meeting, Applicants have 90 days to submit the required non-administrative item(s) and six months to submit the required administrative items. After this time, the application reverts to a denial and a new application will need to be submitted. . For applications involving wetland impacts, the above schedule will not apply because of noticing requirements of the Milll1esota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA). Any project application involving a WCA wetland replacement plan will be considered incomplete until the WCA noticing period is eompleted (see attached page on Wetland Conservation Aet processing). , . . . . I I I E { \ \ 4 '" , i I I \ \ 0 000 0 E , I' 4 444 4 I I I \ ' ~ ~N~:t-> t?~ ~. ogj~{I(~ , ;u I I I ' C I'l ~ i I : )> I I fT1 1,. 'E. !:J I I f"Il-;aJ iJl > I I ~ \~ (0 I, [.g~ ~ i I I I ::::2,:Y Z C~U)'"T]-(j):s::::r:O I g ~ ()l N-'"-' --1p)>fT1;::Orrl)>-<;o I \ ~g --.J ~'-I~~~(Jl 8 e-l~~~ojzo~ rTJ 0.... I II 7' m QJ--.JO ~ ---jfTl-j ;oz C) - \ \ I lOQ N ONI.D);: -<:::O)>fTl?:2)IJ>)> rr1 ?i I \ ~~ 0 ---010-J ::::0 :;:0--::0 O^OZG) Z I ,:y v:::""-< r-l,...,.., .,.. ___/d~ \ o.~ fTl O:P Z fTl ,', 0 0" ~~-e/-- G.:Q- ,-(j) CC: .,.. " n''S '1 I'lZfTl S:Z l<" 0 . \ o~ R" fTlfTl C ;;J -1 fTl Z OJ (Tl I ~-.J '-/ ;0 --I ~ o-l \' l, / _ .). I j ~' I ' ./ 9<0 I (j)- \ ,/ I I'l fT1 ~ , ' I ---1 )> , I' (j) / I I fTl I ;;: I fTl I Z : ..., I ~ '\ I r: I V I \I:. ~ '\ I r-N' I 10 I ......\_ I .' ;;\ ~ -J (") (6, ~JJ ro ",.' ~~ :!h 1j'1T' ~ II' ;". ' ~ ~ CD~'ll:.t:o<.n" ' --r C,..l 00 001,. ~9.,...pti\ . ~ ~ ~,~ 8:1. ....\.... "\ .. --- cf\ . ... . \ ~, --- , . \~I' IJJ \s: 1 \ ~ J>" ':;J " \ -1 \ --"- In /' ("1 VJ1 "- ~ ,/ \.../\J .-., CCO"" Ii1 ~~g \J v' c'<l' .:o.f>i7! '"' ,,),:"..,.* . -,.,,,, ?:P' cD cD ./ ,~:F~~ -.,..s;<' ~~~ '> c:. .0 00 (jl \ ~o ,')0"; o-t-t )> r-- \,'1' ~ I I ~q) -"'s:.,'O)..... ~o . (J\ ~ ?J I 1,1 'l \ / 0 ""s~'4' _ ~ [Ti ~ \',.' 1..1, '" ~ (() .,,~ :;0 .1' .\. , ,/ - C, / . . \ ~ 'I I , I I I I ---------~-------~------------------- :p, ~ 2- NEW BRIGHTON RD. I'lN, l(La rr1 -- C) Al ,:p oAl, 3j!o GO,1'l ([) r1 l{) '< 00 fTlAl n::tJ~ o - c (j) 4 o 0 ~6z OJ u ;;:;;: 5' fTI ~ ~ -.J01 ~;J=>. ~N~ ~ ') :JP :::::---lA;::;:~N~O(tl:::D-I-0o-UJ;t>;t:: U) 0 I"T'\ (D Z ~~:l(b:;o~"-'o::roo,<Q=- C < -< \1.) GO 0 -'"03(t1:J(!l(b..... roO"'O :J <: o ~::E S' a i': 3 Q:; ~ -. (b cr '1 - n ~ :J t.ol O.,c iii' ~ (J1 ~ =: (b ::r a ro <l> <::l 0-0 0" ();::;:- S,<.~;zJg""'\(O--<<Q (1) (1) (J) -. )> 3~o~'<:;~18 ([l ~fJ)Ui(j S.S" -l~-lon~ ~~N~~' =:3 ~ (0 _ n ,- _, (I: -'cD ~ ....... ---. /V ""'. /V ;0 3 '< ,-;:;.; s.,....:.J ~. CL 0 "'7l 0 0 ~ r:: 0 {J) CD -, + 0 (D 0 N -. -" (!j o -- -, ::r -. 0' (0 :.J 0 c: r -,'- '< J!: :J -:J '" - ::J 0 0 fTI 3" (j) m [~g a. 3' ;; ~ g c; <l> 9.. ~ (J) Q ". :J -r-:3 R=' .. (/) VJ:J -:5 ~ Z ~~(j)~Cl...;><"::09..c...':<o=:O Qro n.. OlUl (1) (.No-o -. 0' C 0 (tl I c _.:J )> 0 rp I,V 0 < CD Z ""'" '?D' ;: :J (D N ~-< :;;: z ~ rp a. ~ is 0'-+ =.::., -, VJ 2,n,itlQ::.q a S'(/)fJ)()(1' cr(j) '-.Iv no ([) 01-0_0... 0 =s -l3(l)=~:~8.;"'-J:Jc 9-:J:E8rp OJo 0 () (j) Ulro m"< C ::::,.... ~ _ (ll (tI (I), -, (tJ:;o"'O - 0 (1' 0. Z eN _ C ^ -. -..>. v - ^ 0-- 0 ~ 0 3" 3 ~2 to 2. ~ Q'(;' ~ ~ 0. g 0 I U)':J 1O I:=:>'" ~ OJ 0 e: ~ (tl ;:-.: 0l:J CXl 0" (Jl III 0 ~ .-+ (),-., :J :::::...--.; sm g~~~ 00 . "-cC _-.0;--.30- --j --.j '< ,,- +ZO,< o-s. ~ 1 CD z ~ Q~~ "} ~ a. (Jl Q.. lIl";.v C 1. 9, > ~ rrl co (Xl 0 if) Q.. 8 ~ ~ ~55~ o' ~ o' ~ 9: Z 3 ~ g y:. :J ~.::o (j) ..p:.. ~ ;::0 0 (J) (Jl 0... 0 ~ CD ~ ^ !:; D Il> ~cg :J ~ :r a. ~ ~ 3""''< I g' :J ~ I 0 0 I ()1 (J):J -. W 0 .,!:o z,..' ~;n~3 ~1. 0 go" .-5s::~g aIm lD(Jlo::$. (J1-lo,.-+ 0.:.. N ~i:II co!i -< 0 III 0 '" :::r;:-.::t> (") 0 :::; ro 0.. (I) U1 ~ -, ,,- r a "'m "_ g~?: ""'\ ro C (tJ '< "1J ~ N ::E (n'< 0J (J1 ~ t.N m 0 --rl "ci "'..... f, "'",-< n;:;:"O __ 0 ----- ~ n () ..f::::.. ~ 0 CD U -.J 0 z -m-t 1~=t 0 (tJ ~ ., ~ 0 -:::: :3 ;:;: Sf m 0J c.... - '-.I ~ D "':::ltii g, :3 e. ..g :;J ., g 0 Q'-<:; ::J'-+ 0 - i z .. :;<II~ - v.:;J ro '!.,.... v. ^ ^ ~ N () 0 , m n >ic_ ,.... "\ ::r ,.... ,,'-'-x g 1ft _ ~g~ g" ~ ~ -< z ro Q cr :J.s. n .. = Z~ -"0'" (J) (j' ~ ..... ~ Q c. ro ::;" 3 g ( n r-+- ..., J p, n ~~~ 9: :::r 3 0 N-< 3 g 3' a.. V ) r ~. ~~-:" ~ Q.s. g- d 0 Q. ~ 3. r1 c: !j; M"'<;: - rtl o. 0J --;::.: 0- "D 0 Z ~ i C !:::;: ~ o~~ g <::;J 5' -...J)>o o' n a (t 9 tI.. ~ g ;~'" g. 0: (Jl N (Jl 0. ? ro" ~ (J) ttl [:1 in z ,~ cr::r 00 rtl a.. '< N C og z~." r.:T ro 0 z O::J "D (J) o "0~ [;;:>~ ,-<::E rrl 0..,.. 0' .3 (b I ~ So o::J N - "\ < 3 '"'e! ;>c=€ 0 -. () == -, I.j "'i!'; ':(~ n 51 . _aJ.(Jl 2t :t tv 0 '-' "'." C 3 0 - n. o ::v 'j:'- 9'" :::; C1"'O ::J C. IJl !h id '::1~ ro :t ~ :c ~8:;J ~ c Shoreview Office . 100 Village Center Drive North Oaks, MN 55127-3015 651-483-1200 BURNET fax 651.483-3681 www.cbburnet.com This is the detailed description of our intentions and use of 1978 Thom Drive. The plan for this property is to divide the 1.39 acre lot into three buildable parcels. On each lot we will be building mid to high end single family homes approximately $400,000 and above. Providence Homes will be the builder on this whole project. . The structure currently on the land will be moved to another location or demolished. We will be putting up one spec home and marketing the other two lots as pre-solds so people are able to come in with their custom plan or choose one of ours. Spring is currently our target timeframe for completion of at least one build. ~.~~ <;.......~--- . --- Richard Kotoski -(~y-- Kim Bryson . Owned And Operated By NRT Incorporated. @IB I-M - WAlffiANTY DEED Minnesota Uniform Cuny ncin Blanks 6/1/9 Individual(s) to Individual(s) No delinquent taxes and transfer entered; Certificate of Real Estate Value ( )fi1ed ( ) not required Certificate bfReal Estate Value No. (Dale) Cowlty Auditor by Deputy DEED TAX DUE $ Y%Y: 00 Date: ,J (}~i Y7 .2.C10.s- (rese1Ved for rccordillg data) FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, A lI~n F rCllITTlf';)'::l a sin2:1e Derson (marit~1 ~t~ru~) Grantor(s), hereby conveys and warrants to Richard D. Kotoski and Kathleen Kotoski. and Kimberly A. Bryson Grantce(s) real property in Ramsev County, Minnesota. described as follows: SEE ATTACHED together -..vith all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto. subject to the follovring exceptions: ( Restrictions declarations covenants res:ervations and easemeuts of record if any Check box jf applicable: ~ The Seller certifies that the seller does not know of any wells on the described real property. A well disclosure certificate accompanies this document. I am familiar with the property described in this instrument and I certify- that the status and number of wells on the described ,eal p'operty have not changed sillce the I",t p,eviously at'll di"l~re certificate. . ~c;fu7.' Allen F. Cou ' /- Atlix Deed Tax Stamp Here STATE OF MINNESOTA }" COUNTY OF RaIDsev This instrument was acknowledged before me on July 29th. 2005 Dale by Allen F. Coumeva ."~'o'm . ~ . Notary PUbll<:: - 'roNM~'''",mn~=OK,"""O''''''''- State of Minnesota My CommissIon E)(Pfres ... January Ii 1. 2009 ~ Checkhm: if all or pan of the land is Registered (Torrens) Tax statements forthe real property described in this instrument should THIS INSTRUMENT "'"AS D:RAFrEnBY~NAME o!l: ADDRES); be~cntlo(includellarneandaddtessofGrantee): Signature Title Company Richard D. Kotoski and Kathleen Kotoski, and Kimberly A. 13875 Highway 13, Suite 126 t 978 Thorn Drive SavaQe, MN 55378 Arden Hills, MN 55112 (952)226-7900 FileNo: 32192 1)8/02 10m WARNING: UNAUTHORIZED COPYJNG OFTHrs FORM PROHIBITED. - -- -. ._-. ~ l...Mf\.ln.;::I\......lC.I't.....r: PAGE 02 , ~"""._.._'-. . iil~if'\'II:!r,~irr<,">I"""''.:,;:~",!;~~ EARTH SCIENCE . ~~ ~' , :;i!iin:1.~ - - . : _l~ 1 ';I~lli\I" .~. \ ,ij, .~ :,:11'1\;';: . ,~) ,. ~ ~",I.':: ~Ii~ TESTING TM'" ~. . -. ~ :;;~:~:!l~ '0;-- ~ / ~/ 1~H ~IJ i':I;:;1\." ,.,. . -~::~. ;~1 A SOILS lNFORMA TION SERVICE COMP ANY ~ !~:,~~ ""<i' '" ' , "'" ",1.~JI 4599 370th. ST. NORTH BRANCH, MN, 55056 ir l~,,;)l~ ' '.., , \, " l : ~ m-m-~9. - , :In: ;:~ ~ I Iii!! :~' (,:,' ;!'l ~r!;i' ? Ii M, ;',j. 'ill ~ ~~i Soil Borings ,Ii'i " J~ :~i, ~JI ';';;") " . ~. ;11,,; IJII '~ ~ !~,~; !i~_ 1~1 For' I", " . '1'1 WI i'i j~'" ~- i~IJ Kim Bryson*i ~~, , 'I ~:i!~~ ~,:II ii!} Coldwell B~nker / Burnet jii!: . \~ii 100 Villa!!e Center Dnve. No. Oaks. Mn. 55127 ~11 ~~l ~!~ ":', 651-755-0575 t> f ~ ~ II .II' l. f. ~ ti" ~ I ~ ., ~ :J ~ R ., i' '!~;~ " 'l ~'" L t. ~" ,!ij;! oca IOn ;: I);i, iii~' 1978 mOM DRIVE City of Arden Hills ,l~1 i'I', ,h,,, 'i~ 1"" :~i:;~ ,\:jf :;h; 'ill, ~; ~ ~i:: PREPARED il[! \'. ") ",,~ BY. DAN WEA VER ~'!; "I', . "II' Il ~r , ili!:: MPCA LlC'S. #1056 It:i: \,, ri f ,!~ ,~ ~ ~ ~ f:lit THE RESULTS OF THIS TESTING DOES NOT APPROVE OR DI~PROVE THIS SITE FOR BUILDING \'ill ,!;!:l CONSTRUCTION OR SEPTIC Sys..U:M INSTALLATION. THIS TESTING INFORMATION SHOULD B~ ~i: i~:i SUBMITTE:D TO THE APPROVING OFFICIALS FOR FORMAL REVliiiW AND APPROVAL WHILE TEST :,r;i ,ji" HOLES ARE CLEARLY ST AKED ON-SITE. li!l ~ t ~ ~~ ~ t. Ir~' ;!,!::: ll~1 I~i: ~ ,\~)) :j~ctl J~, .~ . '.'.,' .~ 1l~/l ~I Lllll~ E:m:44 5515745579 EARTHSCIENCE PAGE 04 , . SOIL BORINGS BORING NO.1 0"- 7" = DARK BROWN FiNE LOAMY SAND. 7"-25" = LIGHT BROWN FINE LOAMY SAND. 25"- 32" = LIGHT TAN FiNE LOAMY SAND & ROCKS 32"- 38" "" LIGHT GRAY TAN FINE LOAMY SAND, IRONSTAINS & MOTTLED. 38"- 52" = LIGHT BROWN FINE LOAMY SAND, HEA IT IRONSTAINS & HEAVY MOTTLED. 52"- 68" "" LIGHT BROWN FINE LOAMY SAND, HEAVY IRONSTAINS & HEAVY MOTTLED. MOIST - WET. 68"- 8'-2" = GRAY FINE LOAMY SAND, HEA VY MOTTLED. WET. END BORE BORING NO.2 . 0"-10" = DARK BROWN FINE LOAMY SAND. 10"- 20.0' = BROWN FINE LOAMY SAND. 20"- 27" = BROWN FINE LOAMY SAND, IRONSTAINS & MOTTLED. 27"- 35" = BROWN FINE LOAMY SAND, HEAVY IRONSTAINS & HEAVY MOTTLED. 35"- 6'8" = GRAY FINE LOAMY SAND, YEA VY JRONSTAINS & HEAVY MOTTLED. WET. END BORE BORING NO.3 0"-14" = DARK BROWN FINE LOAMY SAND. 14"- 28" = LIGHT BROWN - TAN FiNE LOAMY SAND. 28"- 32" = LIGHT BROWN - TAN FINE LOAMY SAND, !RONSTAINS & MOTTLE}). MOIST - WET. 32"- 50" = LIGHT BROWN FINE - MED. SAND, IRONSTAINS & MOTTLED. WET. 50"- 7'6" = LIGHT BROWN FINE LOAMY SAND, 1RONSTAINS & HEA VY MOTTLED. WET. SLIGHTLY COMPRESSED. END BORE BORING NO.4 0"- 9" = DARK BROWN FINE LOAMY SAND. (FILL) 9"-43" = LIGHT BROWN - DARK BROWN MIXED FINE LOAMY SAND. (FILL) 43"- 64" = LIGHT BROWN TAN FINE LOAMY SAND. 64"- 8'4" = LIGHT BROWN FINE LOAMY SAND, IRONSTAINS & MOTTLED. . END BORE l1~r 1 ~I :l1111~ 1111:44 5515745579 EARTHSCIENCE PAGE 03 , , . €"~ ;S/I"~ I c;-""-J'" .3 - =_.... ",,- .~ I ~ ~ S".f . r::, .r" F.IS.I-r'j j-(Q u 5" .' ,J I S.iI- oJ$" lof 1 J ":30' l' /S-/ &-:1- ~ 3 " '"> (, ---- OR\0 . r^ ---I' rlO ~. . . . , _ ".J- ''':.; .1f\..$~ ....';, .",," ~,,'jj~ '-\'I't._j' ~r'~ ~ '-' . .' , . . ~~ I I'" ;:-''':'''". ; :~}"~'~1 ~-:~;:Y:f.'> ~~~-i-:~- I l '", "', ' il.,YWt r:,~ ,-{~,_1'... .. _ . t . " '1''''' , ~9 . ,;,:. \'f i~:':";'-~- ~,;.;l t'l ' -.~ ' 1i":J r-:-~ <=' . -~ .. I f; ~ '. ;::;-- . , , , - . I ~ ~t' j J .. om . . . ,-,: I I I I .',' , . , . !' . ,:,,'--. /...., I , ;'$ >, ;,-" .. . . I I I ""1 Aft ,"- , e -1/ -- . ~ ~HILLS MEMORANDUM DATE: September 7, 2005 PC Agenda Item 3.B TO: Planning Commission , 'lli FROM: Peter Hellegers, City Planner ~/ SUBJECT: PC #05-20, Paul Ruppel 1911 Glenpaul Avenue Variance ReQuested Action Consider the requested five-foot side yard setback variance for a new detached garage in approximately the same location as the existing garage, Back2found . Surrounding Area DjreCtio~ North Low Density Residential R-2: Single and Two Family Single Family Detached Residential Residential South Low Density Residential R-2: Single and Two Family Single Family Detached Residential Residential East Low Density Residential R-2: Single and Two Family Single Family Detached Residential Residential West Low Density Residential R-2: Single and Two Family Single Family Detached Residential Residential Site Data Fnture Land Use Pia,,: Low Density Residential ExiSting LandU se: .,.,' ...'.</ Single Family Residential ZOning: ... R-2: Single and Two Family Residential .', SiZe: ., ... , '. ,2790 acres (12,155 square feet) Topography: ". ., Relatively flat \\Metro-inct.lls\A.rdenl-lills\Plarming\P!anning Cases\2005\05-20 Ruppel Variance (PENDING)\09-07-05 PC Report Ruppel Variance PC-05- e lO.doc Page 1 of6 Overview . The applicant is proposing to remove the existing I-car garage and replace it with a slightly larger I-car garage in approximately the same location, 1. Setbacks - Does not meet requirement. The Side Yard setback for Accessory structures in the R-2: Zoning District is 10 feet Minimum Setbacks R~2 Re uirelllent Existiti 6sed Side Yard 10' 4.87' 5' (Accessory) -.-~_._--~- The existing garage was built both too close to the west (side) property line, Staff advised the applicant that the side setback for accessory structures will likely change to five feet when the Zoning Ordinance revisions are contemplated by the Planning Commission and City Council. The application contemplates placing the new, slightly larger (16 x 26 [416 sf]) garage in approximately the same location as the previous garage, just shifted slightly to the north to allow an addition and a deck which are being added to the principal structure. It appears that there should be the 6 feet of separate that is required by the Firc Codc. 2. Lot Coverage - Meets Code Requirement. . The requirement for all residential districts is a maximum 01'25%, The principal structure and detached garage would constitute 20 % lot coverage, 3. Landscape Lot Area ~ Meets Code Requirement, The requirement for all residential districts is a Minimum Landscape Lot Area of 65%. Construction of the new garage would leave approximately 89% of the lot as landscape area. Variance Critcria A. State Requirements Minnesota State Statue in Chapter 462.357, Subdivision 6, (2), defines "undue hardship" as: ". ,.means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use ifused under conditions allowed by the oftlcia! controls, the plight of the landowner is duc to circumstance unique to the \\Metro-inet.us\ArdcnHiJ1s\Planning\Planning Cases\2005\05-20 Ruppel Variance {PENDlNG)\09-07-05 PC Report Ruppel Variance PC.OS- 20.doc e Page 2 of6 ---.--- ..'.' .' property not created by the landowner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if . reasonable use of the property exists under the terms of the ordinance"," B. City Requirements Scction VIII, D, 4, c and d, of the City's Zoning Ordinancc state that, "Adherence to the provisions of this ordinance is required, except for special cases which arise because of the configuration of a particular parcel. The condition shall not have been created by the landowner. A variance or variances may be granted from specific provisions of this ordinance because such land factors as length of a side of a lot, the shape of the lot or the unusual terrain prohibit reasonable development equivalent to that which would be permitted without variance on a similar size lot located in the same district, but which lot has no unusual configuration. Economic conditions alone shall not be grounds for a variance. In no case shall the granting of a variance impair the health, safety, comfort and general welfare oftlie public, nor will it bc contrary to the intent and purpose of the Comprehensive Plan, the official map or this or any other ordinance ofthc City." Variance Findin2s . Minnesota State Stature 462,357, subd. 6, rcquires that Cities consider Ihe following five matters when hearing requests for zoning ordinance variances. 1. Are the circumstances for which the variance is requested unique to the property? (YES) A limited number of properties, those properties in the southwest quadrant of Arden Hills could claim a hardship due to the lot dimensions; most of these lots predate Arden Hills becoming a City and the creation of Arden lIil1s' zoning, Thc applicant has a very narrow lot (65 feet wide) which also limits the applicant's ability to relocate the garage behind the principal structure and still have rcasonable access to the garage and provides little or no opportunity to attach a garage to the principal structure. 2. Would granting thc variance be in keeping with the spirit and inteut of the City's Zoning Ordinance? The stated Purpose and Intent of the City's Zoning Ordinance includes thirteen purposes, of those the following statements appear to be applicable: This ordinance is enacted for the following purposes: \\Metro-ine1.us\ArdcnHills\Planning\Planning Cases\2005\05-20 Ruppel Variance (PENDING)\09-07-05 PC Report Ruppel Variance PC-05- 20.doc . Page 3 of6 I I I , ,>> -- . To promote the general public health, safety, comfort and general welfare of the inhabitants of the City of Arden Hills, Minnesota, (I,B,I) . . To promote the proper use ofland and structures. (1,B,6) . To fix reasonable standards to which buildings, slruetures and land shall conform for the benefit of all (I,B,7) The stated purpose of the R-2 Single and Two Family Residential District is as follows (Section 5,D,2): L To establish areas for the development of single and two family housing at a maximum density of approximately five units per net acre. 2, To reserve development areas for single and two family housing, 1 To restrict encroachment of incompatible uses. .), 4, To maintain density limitations. 5. To take advantage of municipal utilities. 6. To preserve open space, (YES) The variance requested appears to comply with the stated Purpose and Intent of the City's Zoning Ordinance and of the purpose of the R-2: Single and Two Family Residential District. Due to the narrow lots which are unique to this small portion of the City it would not be reasonable to force the property owners to place their garages to comply with the 10 foot side yard accessory setback and basically sever the rear yard or to have the locate the garages especially far behind the principal structures, In addition, principal structures which should be considered a more intense use can be located as close as 5 feet from the side yard property line. . 3. Could the property in qucstion be put to a reasonable use without the granting of the variance? (NO) The applicant could continue to use the existing garage in its present location; however, due to the age of the garage replacement would be necessary sometime in the very near future. Without a variance the applicant would have to place the garage either in the middle of the back yard or excessively far away from the principal structure, where the garage would still be in the middle of the back yard. Single and Two-car garages have consistently been considered reasonable uses if the applicant has no other option than to apply for a variance for the construction of such a garage, Furthermore, the City has approved variances for similar variance requests in this neighborhood where the applicant is replacing an existing garage, 4. Was the hardship created by the owner? (NO) The small one-car garage appears to be the original garage from when the house was constructed and predates the City's Zoning Ordinance. In addition, the lot was created prior to the City's Zoning Ordinance, The structure is small, in poor repair, and \\Metro-inet_lIs~\rdenHills\P1anning\P]anning Cases\200S\05-20 Ruppel Variance (PENDING)\09-07-05 PC Report Ruppel Variance PC-05- 20.doc . Page 4 of6 ." ,- would not accommodate today's vehicle sizes, The proposed garage is still a one-car garage but would be slightly wider so that this and future property owners would actually . be able to utilize the garage, 5. Would granting the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? (NO) The new garage would give the property a functional garage that would accommodate modern vehicles. As previously stated, the surrounding area has many garages that are already sited five feet from the side property lines or less. The variance would allow the garage to remain consistent with this neighborhood norm while staying in tine with where setbacks will likely be changed when the Zoning Ordinance is revised. Plan Review Comments A Building Permit Plans shall be submitted to the Building Official a minimum of two (2) wceks before the planned start of construction, B. No construction shall begin bcfore plans and Building Permits are approved by the City of Arden Hills' Building Official. Staff Recommendation . In Planning Case 1105-20, staffrccommends that the request for a 5-foot side yard setback accessory setback variance be approved to allow for the construction of a new garage in approximately the same location as the existing garage after making the findings that the variance meets the hardship criteria and would not have an adverse impact on surrounding properties or the City as a whole. Options L Recommend approval as submitted, 2. Recommend approval with conditions. 3. Recommend denial with reasons for denial. If the City denies the petitioncrs request, "...it must state in writing the reasons for the denial at the time it denics the request" 4. Table for additional information. Deadline for A2ency Actions - October 7, 2005 The City of Arden Hills received the complctcd application for this request on August 8, 2005 Pursuant to Minnesota Slate Statue, the City must act on this request by October 7,2005 (60 days), unless thc city provides the petitioner with written reasons for and additional 60 day \\I'v!etro-inet.us\ArdenHills\Planning\Phmning Cases\2005\05-20 Ruppel Variance (PFNDlNG)\09-07-05 PC Report Ruppel Variance PC-OS- lO.doc . Page 5 of6 ," .. review period, The City may with the petitioners' consent extend the review period beyond the 120 days. . Attachments 3b-1 Location Map, other pertinent maps 3b-2 Survey/site plan, pictures, statement of request submitted by the applicant . \\Metro-inet.us\ArdcnHills\Planning\Plarming Cases\2005\05-20 Ruppel Variance (PENDfNG)\09-07-05 PC Report Ruppel Variance PC-05- 20.doc . Page 6 of6 ." . Planning Commission Meeting September 7,2005 Attachment 3b- 1 . . ~ LL <1~ ~ 0 0 LD '---' i=) Lr;- e' " , ~ .1) (D ':....) V) 0 0 LD -".Q~ -- ~". ~~ ~~ . j~ ~~i "'" ",' It 6c= ' ' .. .. . . , , ' ~ ~ 8~ ~ . . .. , " "' . . .. " . ,",,'. ;;1: '; ; ~ :j'l Z co 11 ~ .. i a' . '. . ~": > 0 i~ ~J~ r. " .Ii.. ,)~:; lH ~~% .n ~~ ~~~ 2 ~~ ~" so Cf) ~ -~ i;::; "- ;~ :;~.t H IJ~ ;:;:.!'" c: "- ~, ,;;, .' o~ 8~~ r= :z , 0 ID ~~ ~:e '0 ':' ZQ ~!j ::c\ 'D ,0 "....... . 0- m ~! ~~ ~ co;;: 11_ v) e:z: ,;.::, c_ 1; " 1, ~! ~ Z :~ ~ CU '" B~ a~f c ~i ~;~ ~ 3 0 .~~ J::: l'~ C5 ., :! '-' . '" ~~ ~~; ~ ;;; '" ;~ -\i~ " .s E E~ ~~~ .", ~: :Hl'" , iL ~ ~ ~ ~~ , " ~. 3;;: 11 2 ~ ~ ~:s~ ~ ~; ~~~ ~~ a~; II> i= ~~~ ~ !Jill' <:1~ ::" <ii' 0 ~ , I c.- o In H 0 , ~ 0) h' OJ 0 , (0 .illl;,':,! lri~i /tlllii 0 "j., 0 l[) . !i!!;"! i::;;: : e ..Q~~'~~~ ,," ~ ~.,,): t>'" i!.l ': ,;:: : ~":; ~~;6 ~= " I i~~~~~~~ I i:I:~~' p~ , Q") :.!::11 ~~'~~ i: o -: ~g~:t::-!:!;: S' ~ ~ ~;;E~..;!iJ~ .;;: ~~ . .sn~;:: >- ~ ::~~:~ ~~ C oJ::; ~ I'l;'\ ".j.l]ll ~'" ::; ~":f-t:;;;Z " .0 ;;~~ !2~=. . ol) "" ;;~~ 8'- -~ . 0 ~ Hi~HH =~~~~ 0- m i: I'l ~ ~.!:'~ p:E ~ ~:~ a ~ r .. ~ ~~o, z-:O: ">I" ~ ID ~~f~;~~~ !~~;i ~ ~ ~~ECE=~E CO CO III ::~f.;O~~':~ "'~;: I .,-, 1:1: (I) ~ 6_i!V~::-'8 ~~~.~u ~ gmnP ~ ~:: ~ 0 :e ;;'" - ,~...~ ~ ; c ~3~~~~~~~ 0 .. , 6 1;:: ~,~~!: l<...... is , _;;Q="'jIt_"=':O- ~ . ~ ~~~~~~!~i ID I~,;.~~~~:t ....J ~ g ~~.;.:;'~.?; ~ .--. ~ mH~m ~.2;t.;2"~~ ~ II l;.g..:: Z:3: ~i; ~ ;1;;:i;'5~"'~.p'" ~ :~E.Hn; ~~~=...~~.!:t In i~~:~~~i~ - - 0 ~ , I ,,~l9+ , , I I I v, ~ "'TN ~ , r--- ~ , V) f---- V, ~ r--- I . (.09~+ ~ ~i ..I ~ v, i L t.r)~ r--- ~ V, V) N I I ~ '-D , r--- ~ I ~ i i ~L ~'l9v+ ' ~ \, " \Os; v, f' v, ~ r--- I r--- I ~ i ~ '" '-D ~ , ,1'1- ~ ,,~9E+ r--~ v, , r--- l~ i ~ I 'It '-D ~ , '--- 000;;- V, "vv~ ' 'It r--- V, ~ r--- ~ v-. '-D . ~ ,SEl+ I ~ ~ V, 1m 0\<-- r--- ir--- :::s ~ '-D '-D ~ ' I ,OLH ~ C'i l"""'--; 1/ 0: -T' Oco 'n +, '-4 ~::!.. r--- ~ I '-D ~ ~ , i\!:: (SOH) , , r tn Iv, ~ i'D ~ 00 ~ '-D ....... v-. - (:) ~ .99 :::s or. '0 l..___ ....... r---'O ,L81 r--- + ~ SEI I - - ~ - I - -- I -- - - - ,99 -- - - - ,L81 . 1 v, 00 ~ v, OO~ 00 ~ v, .......~ ~ 00 .. __ _ _ '.'OJ . ..'" ,_~_ VN"\41(.-.""+-- J ,,' 'I ~ \..!~ ~ ;-'-1' ,..--.'" " - ::. I~ -~ ~ I~ ~ ~ " "'" - - -- ., l _____ \ ~ - 0:-'\" ..'" ,1---'.-/\/ '\ \.. " , .' ~ " " .. ~--..... /~,' \.. \, i; ,,~'~) '. ,/ ,,\' \ ," 'C-'-~-'S~ ,; I ' \ '.. . ~ ' . "..' , <''\ \, \\' II \\" ( " .. \ '\ \" ,'''" , \:' \: ~ ' ",:' ~'.r~ ::- i .. : ," . "".. ~, I "i' ':' " , < ' ~ '" ~ . ,::J "'~, ,~ ~ " - - "'" ~- -- - ~ -- -...,-: r., _ ~. ~-- -- ~ '~' . - i ' ""', r"'" i.' .-^ ~ > j ~ J p ~ : c 1 'd-- ! ..' / ~"-- - r'. - "'= - 'J '<' . - ,', __ u._ ""'" u_ ../ T -0' ,/, l' r ~ _.1 v;)/.. ! <, ". s E~ ...~ ~ . ' \ ,..' ',,,' - '=' u_~~.~."" ':.- . ,.; ~~ _ 'm~ ~ "'---:- ~ -.q- .r,:: .'.'" ~, " ..., [ ~--< 'f . ,-'" "."''''',~-,~ -- _~iu ...!!. .... """."",,...,., "'.~'Ol.' ".C" ,",,,, ,,~, --- "--'- "',- ,;",- "i -. - --------,----------- ---~ & ASSOCIA ITS INC. THE RUPPEL PROPERTY 1 ""0 5URV[.,,~G.1:"'QN[FR~JG '" ~p_.~'~'- "'.-""".~-"'''''''' 1911 GLENPAUL A VENUE ellY OF ARDEN mLI.S, RAMSEY COUNTY. M1NNESOTA """..---- 1 , 1 'if,.i~~''''' I ;:;;-~.'"..- ~ 1 ,-,~~~~ ~-;{:.........~~~ ~I - -- s a.'5J~1" [ 65.dp -- 1",- I '''If '-1 I , ..m ,I,.. ",,-:,'. , , I"~ , ! I n 1 Ii/,ll I i l[GI\lDl:.s~Pll00 I oClr a,'''' 0"0 """lJtJl'HT"",""'''' I: I ! i;: "'.,""-.,....,,,._~'.....m"_ " ' ~~_:~~::,r::l~3~;=;; , ' II t' , I ~~''''''''''~~c'''''...',. . , II (----'........--~.- " I I 1 " 1 ir I. , ~ I ' ARfA5u"",.RY , I' I l<e!.' ""\<J'" '!~: ,: n",,""""~_" _'~:OO"'''_~ "".0'(.>."" I i >.l' __..- ,.,,,to, . ~~~',,"'::';;;','" , I ~st::lc : ."""",.n.... _ "'''''''~. "" , , ' , ~ b . !I : j-... ""'"~tj (""~' '.---'1 I ..it- , ." I " " II!: , ,I I:~ : I II ' " ! I r' \: ;j i I, j: ~'-r I ~:- ) I v' "\ r: L~2 i ~ ,~" -1- ,'i &-,,;\ I ,rn t. >.1",-"" - :~, ,~~ ' "''I -, I , ' I II 1~1l Gl.rW"Ul ~vrNUE ~, I , :"';'!'~"l...~. ~'. i , , .," -s , , , '~r-- . , .___...,.'" I_ I , ,. , ! " -1/ , i i , -- / ; ; ~~~,_....... , , ; 1 ;~~ I lON'-~" R[QUJR["ENTS "'<<" .-, - ,.."" ~ -'.....,,',,''''""~ ~,-, ! ......."'..,,''''''''''_.)-''.000'''-'. -"'-"'':-'''''''''-~ .."" ~,. _"'-~'O''''""'("~''''_'l_ """" --- --."",,.,,,,,,-.:-,,,--;-i- ..............."." "',.,.,.., , I ............"'" ..,,~..., _ d' / . ".........."""'""""',""""""'-,,, , .. -'-"""""",.'........" '"""''''''''0'''''''1.'-'''"''' , =-( . .-<>""......""".....",,, ~ .-...."'., ~ N~_'''_''''''''''''~!,_'''''''''' --'r-- .,,""""'''-'''"'''' ""OQ'~ , ~~ti:,>- ~,,-"'~-""" , ,.,op,,,..,,......."","""'''',,, , ~-'- GlENP~~~~!:, VENUE I ,N OO'5.nr W65.W S I , I LEGl:NIl \ , ~" I ~ :;.~ =~~,- --, I '""' ::'~'~?J CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY "::.-':;;OC""" .. "'.''''"'~-::'k"",. ~" ,~~-, ..-- :;~:::1:;~i::1 '-'''.'~::':%~~ ___n__ __ . Planning Commission Meeting September 7, 2005 Attachment 3b - 2 . . ------------- - ----- . Arden Hills Planning Commission, I'm requesting a variance on the 10ft. limit on placement of a garage near the property line. The present garage is in serious disrepair and must be replaced. Currently, it is 5 ft. from the property line as can be seen on the survey. I would like to site a new 16 ft. wide by 26 ft. deep garage, 5 ft. from the property line. At this point I would like to address the conditions of the property that support my request: #1) The property is unique in that there are many mature trees and gardens on the property. At least one of the trees could threaten the structure if it is sited to closely to it and possibly jeapordize the tree itself. If the variance is not granted, then the garage corner closest to this tree would be approx. 22 ft. away. The tree's canopy is approx. 42 ft. in diameter, so the tree limbs would come within a foot of the garage and the root system may be disturbed by the concrete slab for the garage. Also, one . mature garden bed would be 7 ft. the side of the garage. #2) The granting of the variance is in keeping with the spirit of the City's Zoning Code as the placement of the new garage will not adversly affect the neighboring property because there are no existing structures in close proximity to it. Also, the livability and appearance of my property would be enhanced. #3) It would be difficult to reasonably use the property without the variance. The rooms at the back of the house are quite small, therefore, I'm planning on adding a small extension to make them more liveable for myself and any future families. Siting the garage without the variance would crowd it to the house. #4) The hardship was not created by anything the family has done. The backyard is only 65 ft. wide, siting a new 16 ft. wide garage 10 ft. into the property would visually cut the yard in half. #5) The variance will not alter the character of the neighborhood. In fact, the variance I'm requesting would actually be in keeping with the character of the neighborhood as many of the garages rest well within the 10 ft. requirement. . This home has been in my family since 1951, so I'm very familiar u. . with how the house lives and the positives of the property, such as the mature trees and gardens, the close-knit neighbors and the homey feeling of the community. For these and many other reasons, I'm hoping to make this my new home for many years to come. This variance would make the property much more useable for myself, as well as those of future residents. I've included several photos that illustrate many of the points I've presented in my request. Thank you for your consideration, Sincerely, V~~~~/ Paul W. Ruppel . . . . ... ..' _...,- .,,--- '- ~ .~._--'. - _.'~'__"?_"""__,_c_,.?'__' . ___'~a._ ___',',',__'._' '_~'~_.,~'_', ''''''~'''_,~~'~'~''__~''~,_,"~~>=",___~ --~_____','->_~F c__~,_. "_~"__7_."_Y',_"~"= ~-~".-.~-"'''-, . .--- - -. ~ ... i . . "'_~"""'"",""V ",,~,~_,~ ~'~""'~'''''__'_'.~~~~'_''_''''''''''''_'"'' . I : . . - ----"..----,-".._-,--~-- _'~_'_' __"d_"'_r_,'''~___ ._.M._.... _'_'~'"'' _..,~__..~"'_"'""__,'_',"_O"._,,,,,"~,.<>,,,,,,,,",...<.__~.,,..,,";~""C""~'~'=.'_"_'_'''''_'___~''_'''~'____'''''__~'''_'____' ,. . . . e e e , i i KEMPER & ASSOCIATES INC. THE RUPPEL PROPERTY LAND SLJR'l,fYlNG. ENGINEERING 721OLDHIGHIiAY8....", 1<lEW9ll1GHTON,loIItlmsalA 55112 1911 G LENP A UL AVENUE 6~1-&3'-O351 F~~ 6~1-l!3'-8e05 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA (S!I!:l.NI.L~1IU.OI'I) I l I ~ &.::;.~".,,w. I YfJ..~3.f'''' . . . I '''''''lGJAU<10'''''' ~..if" ....."""""'........DIT ;;<"'1 .~ ._I1lIIIl:_ - =".Jf" ~......... .,.........,,6.".. I.: SOILl/SO " 39\tH\t9 M3N Ollns 3^\t lO\tdN319 f f6f NOI.L~nH.lSNO:J I NOIlJOO\t 3V'JOH H\t3H 13ddnH lO\td 11'1;/' 3A08V :A8 N8lS30 ~ .- I I i f- 0 0 LL ~ " i!:> ~ I w -' <{ I u (f) I I I .<T," ------- -111 .'TII' I r i , I 1 ~! II I I I I : I' ]" ,I I ' Ii I I I I ! . ,I !~ : 'I,~" I:, . -; 1, -! l-H-1-1 ,I " I '" , I I I I I ' i~ ", IIi::- I:. :! "I '!' H , , J .rr~' ~ ',' . , I, 'u -~---;.', _ : ~ i'", .~," '''".,~ '" ,t ii i i tll i ~ ... f"r",.--J 11\ ,~ . , :! - - -f--! \, .- ~_.__, ,', ;",:, ,....'u..------tJ -~ t; I' - ~ ~~ , , l"i~ ~ I, c, !; j! j " 1 -- :i ; ~ ~ -', ; I ~i-I 'I ~..--;-lll ~ - g i ~ ~ ~ i !" i ':+>t ! ~- '<-- ~ ~ ;H i~ n-- -, -m !" '-II: , ~~i ': ~ .....-..~=,----- I ~ ~! I 1-: ~~ ~..<I'~~ ~zL--.~"_,,,____ H: , --,~,"-,"-- -- .....----~..,~o_.n .o-~, I e I L -~._---- _..__u, .- gOI WgO N 3EJ\tHVEJ M3N OllnS 3^V lnVdN31EJ ~ ~6,. NOIDn~LSNW NOLLlOOV 3l^JOH HV3H 13ddnH lnVd ll\f 3A08\f ! :~N8IS~ _ () /~ Cl:l ' Z 0 I ? '3 <D /1 0:1:" oi ,,~ I! '1111 - ' f- '" "- ("l IN,' / ",-'-" 1____ 0 <( (9 __ r- OO ,^ ~ l' Ii I ::. W Z N It W ....J ,. 'i CO I _ __ (/) 0::: : b=-o ..- (() 0 I ~ o CfJ (f) W / Ii: /Cf) w U) 1-- ?; ::l ill ~ :::f ~ !:: / "'::"", il! /// 0 I- W ~ ~ ~ ::r: e::: ---l () U u. -- k ,I! ~ :J 0:: I- 0 .....J J- I- (!) S (j) if) LL -- --___ Ii! I- I- Wo:::O (9 <:( <{ "-;;;:: o<l <{ <{ 0 ----c~ / /;:/ 1',1 '!' =o! 0:: 0...1;;;:: () ill ::J I a::: w LL LL. U) I ,/ Ii; _ ~ CO 0 0 III I- (/) o Z 00 W () w m ::; ::; / (' ! F, " x" Z ...1 W 0 <(j-o...-C9:::>:J=> \, dl I ~ ~o LLI-Q m::;...1<{;O::OOOzz \ ""...., "I' N~()/WW,,- (1)" <co...ow= -- \\'.::: I / I-O::w o " I f- "- <D ::; :2 \ \. );' ,/ W 0 f- o x ,,--,O::;;;X::>::> \' I, g gugg // O::ZW ~. (l)W-~_....J...J \ /1 ____ aoo::: ~N<{"-c::.O'-<{<{ y ! / ZOO ,,\. I,. 0 w Z \\ ,,,,,,,,~ 0000 \10: 00:::0 Z \\1 W=>CoO:: '" \, I, O::OX<{ ~ \ :JO m a.. '- a.-ow ill -:::l 0... ~NO:: o Ow 0(1) -lz U ill !!:!~ _ o a ::r: ill i p=' I-z (f)J--.._" _ 1 _ rf)- 0:::5-- I 1-ltL f- I 0:: W "- I , zU)WI- Wf-"-<{:2 "I i-c'-, ",' ~ ~ : > -' <{ ;0:: 0 I" n' :...' C-J ' u.. <( 0... n::: "" I b O~~Ddu.. j["--l ~"-I O '^ I., W:. it 11___1 "I! , , VJ...... U '<::t i' . ',' , a:: <( lJ... - N ~ r~j 1_~.-1 ~L r- I . ~ 11 ~ H~~ -fi_H I ~ i~! ~ I 'HI t:: 0:: c j ;O::w 'I'~' _ ~~ i~ Wi 'i I, .IO i ' : ' ~I-O Z i . O<{I ClQ " 0:: "wa 21-............... I _ .A'" COI<( - .....u... -.. ~rf)W o:5ow HH Wm 00 "- -~ 0;;; ':2 W O WZ.::e: U)-J......... 1.1- .. 00:: I- - n::: en u... 0::, r ~ iY 0 > ~ ;;;:: tu <{ "1-1' _ '_ I " I-O>W WOO ,- z'tt: '!'...10WO::~IO:: T '0- u,rn;O::rf)()O::ooO , , 'i ~ m ,,~ N ..- a.. I 0 ~ ..- >! J - _" -- ~ ~ -f , ~Cl () -- . I ~Z o . .1 u- . ~ >= r- ~ i 0 (0: _: ! r-~i 0... 0 W ..- , , ,'I' -'LLO ~~ ~ <{ }:> ---- ~ W 0:: o gtuCl 0:: ___ ...10::;0:: Clw mOo Z~ wz~ -~ Ow ~~Z~lY tuum <(LLOO~ Ir= = W 1=00::: OcoN I 0<(0:::0::: zx"<:t . (/JZ~!-<( 0= Z CO ~ ::> ill m ':)'0..9. sJ.slor <J0013 3dS "v X .z 0 ~ ~ rf)0 0 ~ I 0::0 03M3<J8S ON'" 03nlEJ OOOMA ld "viE <D_rf) = X co = 0... N ('I") co <( ___ ~_-.J ~NO::i:O> -.- 901L1lBO C') 39'o1:1it9 M3N 011n9 3^it lnitdN319 >.6. NOtl:JmUSNo::J NOI1IOOit 3v.JOH C1it3C1 13ddnCllnitd llV 3^08\f . U '1.8 N8'S30 I 1 i z 0 i= / ;; W / , ...J ;J w I I 0:: i 11 <>: I 1 w I 0:: I I \ \ ' , \ l! i , I; i \'\1 I ! \ ' ~ \ 1,; I' \\' 11 \ , , i . L i I w 1-0 110 ' IL.___________' ] I I I I i ' I ' ] ! HJ{}f II I n, L --1 ] I ..j . i _____---.J -- -- . SO/Ll/SO ~ 38\1l:lV'8 M3N OllnS 3^V' lnV'dN318 ~~6~ NOI.l~nlJ.lSNO~ NOIIIOOV' 3~OH BV'3B 13ddnB lnV'd ll'lf 3^OS'If U ;AS NDtS3G Z 0 i= <( > W -' W W 0 (j) . i I '. 1111'llmll~'I~TI \ .... I II II \ III . ,I 111111111 . II 1111111111 I . 11111111111 . I I, I 111111111111111 i I i I I~il,illlllllll\hl . 1 . I \ SO/WBO n 3E:Nl:lV8 M3N OllnS 3^V lnVdN318 · .6. NOIDmUsNOO NOIlJOOV 3V'lOH l:lV3l:l 13ddnl:lln'o'd :-: ~l~~~ ------------ --------------------------- z o ~ ru -' w w Q (fJ . r' , , ! ; , ; / ;{\n \ II \ II !lTjT!TlTlfrTin ;;JIIII\\\' W\\ \ 1\ \1,\11\ 111\ 11\ \ III \ I \ f"t~, \1 /""_ rT'-- LL~ L I , \ \ II \ II \ I i I II I ~ :-PI 1FrCTT=' ;tll q I II III I \' IllLL~JJ1~'1 \ I 11111~11-r_-tlf-~-lf-J II I, II I ~l 111'1' I '''1 1- 'I ~1 r"' r- I ! I \ II I I I II II II IL 1-1\\1111 \ Il'i, .J~l_-'u-JL}, I, / I III I ,I I \ L~UI'\ I, II H, -~ l-- ~~' , . ; III \ 11):1 I 'II 1\ I 1\ TilT I ilTif, I III, I I -, I, 1- 1--1-1 f- I, II , A ' I "I 'I III I 'I' ,-., .-1 ,. 1-] -I /'/II~j1111 111\, 1\IIII,II\IIIIIII,II'IL.Jl,'r-,J-jL,-i,r~rll /1'/11\ II \,,1, I I' 1\ III1I1I II III, I, '1'1 IIL-l t--' l-il~, 'I_I-j- , , II I I ' I I II 'rl '1, L '. I ~I 1/\ II \ I111 II11 III \ 11,1,11 11,1',1 1\ \ I-l--I -[1, }-J-I.:-i I, I II i III \ II i I II' III I, I "I I I-I 1- c-. ',r r [ 'II I I I I " 'I i ! I I' I, h ., r-- 11" i <1\\\\1111\\ I, II III 1111\'11111\ \1111,11,1\ lir-\TJli-iJ1I, I _ ' " ,I, I i I II, i I ,I"~ 1--, ',-I f-, [. "I' I " ,_I ---I f-, H -j I . e ~ ~HILLS MEMORANDUM DATE: September 7,2005 PC Agenda Item 3.e TO: Planning Commission FROM: Peter Hellegers, City Planner ~ SUBJECT: PC #05-07, (rcvisited) City of Arden Hills Considering Adding Ncw Language to the Front Porch Ordinance RCQuested Action Discuss and consider Ordinance #366 which would amend section 6.C.2.d of the Zoning Ordinance by inserting new subsection 6.C.2.d.3 into the Zoning Ordinance, allowing for front porches of up to ten feet and with a minimum setback of25 feet from the front or side-yard corner property lines, which mcet design standards to be allowed subject to staffreview and approval in areas where the plats were created with setbacks less than 40 feet . Overview The Planning Commission reviewed thc original Covered Front Porch Ordinance and recommended approval (5-0) at their March 2, 2005 meeting. Subsequent to the PImming Commission meeting there were rcvisions made to address thc concerns of the City Council to create the ordinance in its current formal. The City Council approved to the revised Covered Front Porch Ordinance at their May 9, 2005 meeting. Since the language has gone into effect we have had two proposals for covered front porches under the new language. A third homeowner utilized the additional allowance for uncovered decks of up to six feet Of the two proposals for covered front porch exceptions, one was just recently received and has not been processed; the other was for a homc in the Chatham neighborhood which staff could not approve due to an existing front setback of approximately 33 feet Under the existing language the resident could have constructed a 3-fi)ot covered front porch but that would not havc lell much room to work with. The design appeared consistent with other homes throughout the neighborhood that had originally been constructed with some form of a front porch. After a windshield survcy of the neighborhood, it became dear that there is demand \\Metro-inel.us\Ardl'IlHills\Planning\Planning Cases"2005\05-07 Zoning Ordi<lnce Amendments for Front Porch Encroachments (APPROVED)\09-07-05 PC Repon Consideling Draft Ordinance 366_doc . Page 1 of2 ------..---- for front porches as there were approximately twenty homes that had chairs, benches or other features outside of the front doors where a front porch might be. . Staff has published today's meeting as a public hearing in the event that Commissioncrs are comfortable with the language and would like to have the City Council consider the matter at their September 26th meeting. In this case the Plarming Commission should take a vote to either approve or deny draft Ordinance #366 and have the Council reccive such recommendations at the September 26th mccting. I f Commissioners fcel that addition discussion or review is ncccssary then this item could be scheduled for a second public hearing at the October 5th Planning Commission meeting. If thc Planning Commission is comfortable with Draft Ordinance #366 as is or with certain changes, staff will forward the ordinance on to the City Council. Staff Recommendation Since it was not anlicipated that whole neighborhoods had different setbacks that the Zoning District standards the idea of a different allowance for covered front porches in such neighborhoods seems to be fair. Therefore staff rccommends approval of Ordinance #366, Options . 1. Approve draft Ordinance #366 2- Approve draft Ordinance #366 with changes madc by the Planning Commission. 3. Deny draft Ordinance #366. 4, Tahle for additional information - (in this please specify what additional information would be required). Attachments 3c-l SUP for the Chatham neighborhood (reduced front setbacks) 3c-2 Letters from Chatham neighborhood residents 3c-3 Ordinance #357 (approved by the City Council) 3c-4 Zoning Appendix A - Design Guidelines 3c-~ Draft Ordinance #366 \\Metro-inet.us\^rdt'111 lills",Planning\PJanning Cases\2005\OS-07 Zoning Ordiance Amendments for Fl'OllI Porch Ellcroachmenls (APPROYED)\09-07-05 PC Report Considering Drdll Ordinance 3&6.doc . Page 2 of2 Planning Commission Meeting September 7, 2005 . - Attachment 3c- 1 . . oY-'.y;;- )-!:-~ .:-~="" $T ATE OF Ml tlNESOT ^ COUNTY OF RAMSEY CITY OF ARDEN HillS SPECIAL USE PE RM 11 -- CasO' fiG. 76-41 . life under-signed. Clerk-Administrator of the City of rden Hi lis. does hereby cedi ty that this Spadal Use Parmit IS granted pursuant to the provisions of Ordlnonce No. 99, as amended, 'h. ZonIng Ordinance ot 'he City of Arden Hills, In accordance. WITh , publ Ie hearing duly hald by the Planning Cammi 55 i on thoreot on Fob ru~ry 15. 1917 and subsequent approval by the Arden Hills CI ty Council OJ) February 261 1977 . Par-mission i5. accordfnglv given 'he appll cent. BAN CON. INC. , a Minnesota corporatioll, hereInafter rafarrtJd to as "Parmi ttea". to de...alop and construct upon tho- tracts of land hereInafter des- cri bed a resl dent i 61 planned un l"t davelopm~nt consisting ot OOG hundred t j fty (150 ) single fami ~ y lots ~ public streets and ut III tIes, an d op.en space and ped6strl6nwoys to be used tor public recreational purposes, all in accordance wltb th6 revised preliminary plan ot ths Pe rmi ttee, dated March 9, 1917 , axcepf a$ othe nt (S8 mod! fled herein, Tho revised preiimlnary plan, and all of Its components, <:lre on fi Ie with. 'ha Clerk-Administrc"tor In 'h. CI ty Hall. The tracts of land which. ar6 the subject of this Specl ill I U5e Permit are ~ppar&lltly owned of racord by the Pe rml tte6, a~ld their regal dGscrlptlons ere ~s SBt forth on Exhl bit "A" attached hereto ane made D part hor30f. Th-! 5 Specla~ Use Permit Is issued not only subject '0 Pui"fnltts8-'S complf~nca- ~ith 'he gDnef"a I condl tl onS on' docunlon't5 menTioned harein3bov9~ bo' 05150 subjact to. all 0' the applicable re-qul rem8l1ts of Ordlni)nce No. 99, " amended> 'ho Zoning Ordinance, ~nd Ordin~nce No. 98, 8S amen dad. thl'> Subi1lvislon and Platting Orcii ilance; subject to PBr-rnittee's obtDiolng proper Building Per:nilt:,: alld subJoct to th(; fol lowing special conditions: .. Permittee shall dedicato to CltV. In Its p I at, Out- lots A, B, C and E. and -;ha I I con\lE:<Y Out lot D by \tarrall"ty Deed to School District &21. 2. Slgnage and IElndscaDln~ " 0\11 entranc;Ojs 1"0 "the p I finned unl t d61/elopment sha 11 b. submitted to end 6Pprov~d by -rhe CouncJ I be fore instal letlon or construction. Th. . S I gnage treatment p-roposB(l by -rh\> Parmi ttee . n fhe Entr~llcEl S j 90 COrlCQpts. doted January 24, 1971. is llOaCC!:lptoo 10 'nd :;ha! I Ilot be usod by the Permi ttee. 3. Oe"o lope. shal I perform gr;.'lldiog and prepare inl ti a I {-ouocot 1 un for the- p8da5-~r-lan lIiay at a cost not to exceed $15,000. City Counel I ~.r.B I I dete rml os locaf lorl of pedest,.-i .iW woy in Out iot C. 4, Cost incurred by tho- City for fcasibi lity stUdy oj proposed struets end ut I II ties Shall b. pal d by Perml ttee If p rojoct is r:ot cor.Sum;:ltod. 5. Mlnlmcm setbGcks for a I! houses- In Chat"ham will b. as 10 flows: Front sot back 30' Side y.srd, dwo I I in] 10 ' Sido Ybrd. gare[;i.I 5 ' l\ggr-eg3-re slQe YGrti 15' Dated This __~id!._~d3Y 01 March. 197"1. CI1Y OF AfWEN KillS BY(}tc&~ f:tlJzfj)~ Ch.,r I otte McNIe.sh Clerk-Administrator . . Planning CommissionM.eeting Septerllber 7, 2005 Attachment 3c - 2 . . . ~T, Id-e.r tf7f~~r~ , ~ ~)1?-~or ". !J.-)en/-tJI" (!;+/'J:?-v)Vl-t~~ FrLl~,' ~2"/ Ceil].;) /Ver; ~'~>1 fl-7e;: C ),pth -;7}'1/1 Av ~ (~-r-, r po r<-iv.s c' vJ E--e.V\.UJ<<..rc,[0 / o"--~+" WI? Kc r--"'.V'I'>10Yj ! fr rov~s -"~ t',/'L6r,U:&1,,fonVl.c'V\7 /61--5 Ire ilc..Y' ~h---chv~o"1, St:>~vC .+~e, /o/s , I w-t.7'C p/6 H.eJ I vv':ff; ~>) -MV] /fLf Y , , . ~-e-I-h;y~ ()" LO.kt:""p-1-:0~ ~r VClf-,02>ILQ.... ~5I1ee.J""d ~ P~>-d~..l: k.;>1'ij b~{jr'l'C, verl ~oplA.!:;r 1", ne&J <'-.C-n.'I--J,r~"<,,""c/ 'ih"'7 1M I hr:;Jif ~Y;1,YhLth' c--cvhv1J 6v~J.f--- vv.-;;~],.(rr-t ;.J.. ~1; ;~p7-<ve5 .f~c.Y'-'V~;""'f~ M~;;- \No",- I) 1~",d~-\ f,oHl. ~_ /V>€J'T f, ;,,~ f. D<"cd ~~ ~ g:~ .f- A r~ ff; l&c ' , ~Oc' C. n2/ i<' tc-L---- ~;.j",-",--J -S':f\~ /1.1'-( W~ 1;'tL~ i"~dJ'Oi) Wi~h f4Pf~ 0,"" +l", If- ....,,--.7 L,J f.'~_d h.1 ~ J; f, ""- ,r""'-A. 4 "'e.e : "'- -t.-a,,-(J 0 ~ c>"" J,. t\ ~ \ . ---------- ---- -- . City of Arden Hills, MN 55112 RE: FRONT PORCHES IN eHA THAM NEIGHBORHOOD Arden Hills City Planner & Council: We suggest that Chatham residents have a special provision allowed them regarding the new front porch ordinance. Due to the fact that setbacks in the Chatham neighborhood are less than the assumed 40 feet, it is necessary for Chatham residents to have special allowances made in regards to the setback regulations. Front porches would add to the quality and socialization of our neighborhood as well as improving security and the tax base. The porches would follow the design requirements specified by the city. In the spirit of the intent of the new porch rules a provision is needed to enable this opportunity for properties not conforming to the zoning ordinances. Thank you, . Residents of Chatham neighborhood in Arden Hills MIt; ; ;r;'p, Jh C' Alttu J 3 70B t!h.HrJ..h, Crcle. ~~ l~ 2~ 57 tv ClJfff ~ C. (,{. (..{. e f &i~ ~ Sk~eo.r /15"2. ~ tloe--. fJ~l ... f;...p ;""r- 17"1'1 ~. . J>t1t V( f f,.. QtU ~ V1,:' C7~ "-1 { '7 -<- c At1:f ~a"'t #" € . Phil Kramlinger and Joan Furlong August 25, 2005 3704 Chatham Circle Arden Hills, MN 55112 City of Arden Hills, MN 551]2 Dear city planner, mayor, and council members, My family was delighted with the possibility of adding a new covered front porch to our home as allowed by the new porch ordinance. However, when we applicd for a building permit we were informed that the Chatham neighborhood has less than the 40 foot setback required by the building code, and the porch could not be built closer than 30 feet from the Iront property line. 1 am writing to request that the porch ordinance be revised to allow the 10 foot cxtension of the porch into the setback allowed when the house was built. The porch would follow the side setback and design requirements specified by the city. When the new porch ordinance was adopted 1 believe the intent was to build community spirit with attractive gathcring places on the street-side of Arden Hills homes. Our . proposcd porch is attractive, fits the layout and stylc of our neighborhood, and is welcomed by our ncighbors. , the spirit of the intent of the new porch rules, a provision is needed to enable owners of properties not con forming to thc zoning ordinances the opportunity to build a covered porch. f Qj Kt fo< YOO<OO5)"O"' Phil Kramlingcr & Joan Furlong {/11- CI~~ '~I~z... . ----- . August 24, 2005 Dear Arden Hills City Council Members: We are writing you in regards to the front porch ordinance for homes on non-conforming plotted lots of the Chatham subdivision with less than 40 feet setbacks. We feel that there are many positive aspects to allowing for this provision. First, the adding of front porches benefits our neighborhood by upgrading our community. All of the homes in Chatham are approximately 25 years of age and are in need of upgrades in order to maintain the charm that Arden Hills has been known for and to keep it a desirable neighborhood and community for prospective house hunters. Secondly, there are many homes already existing in Chatham that have a front overhanging porch, some with even less of a setback, and we feel that it would not look out of place with the overall look of the neighborhood. We support allowing Phil and Joan Kramlinger a building permit to allow them to add a front porch. Everything that the . Kramlingers have ever done has been very tasteful and would not distract from the charm of our neighborhood or our cuI de sac. Sincerely, Dave and Greta Schramm 3720 Chatham Circle Arden Hills, MN 55112 ~~ \ . 1820 Chatham Ave. . Arden Hills, MN 55112 August 24, 2005 Arden Hills City Planner Arden Hills City Council Members 1245 West Highway 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112 To Whom It May Concern: I am a resident of the Chatham neighborhood in Arden Hills. 1 am writing to suggest that the residents of the Chatham neighborhood have special provisions allowed them regarding the new front porch ordinance. Due to the fact that setbacks in the Chatham neighborhood are less than the assumed forty feet, it is necessary for Chatham residents to have special . allowances made in regards to the setback regulations. Neighborhoods having houses with front porches offer an opportunity for increased socialization and sense of community, and may also increase the security of the neighborhood. Updated residence entrances will potentially increase the neighborhood's housing values and tax base. Please consider granting special provisions regarding the Chatham neighborhood's setback requirement on the new front porch ordinance. , Shelly Hawkins . . Kcvt'h;[,e-e-Vl/ /vi J o-tvY\&01'V . . 3700 OuvthVl/1t1/ CVv~ A YMVl/ fl VlA.&, /vi N 55112 612 -636 -8052 August 25, 2005 To: Arden Hills City Planner and Council Membcrs In the June issue of the Arden Hills Notes, 1 was interested to read that rules regarding front porches were being relaxed. The intent, 1 believe, was to provide for flexibility. However, I've now been made aware that in this particular subdivision (Chatham Circle), the setbacks from the street are already not in compliance with current ordinances. It seems the homes in this neighborhood will not be able to take advantage of recent rule changes. I am writing to you to encourage you to consider provisions to provide for an exception to the required setback. . The addition of front porches would provide for more community within neighborhood~. Home values will increase and it will add to the unique and friendly environment that already exists in Arden Hills. Thank you for your consideration. Respectfully, W.~/J.e2. A Sli!:lt1iVWY\. KatWeen M Jo on . . August 24, 2005 Arden Hills City Council 1245 Highway 96 Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112 Dear Sirs: It is our understanding that homes and/or additions in Arden Hills must be set back at least lorty feet from the street. Most homes in our neighborhood, Chatham, have raised entry slabs, and many of those homes have roofs built over those slabs. In some cases there are roofs across the entire front of the home, making small 'porches.' We're sure these slabs/porches are not set back forty feet as is now required in Arden Hills. We have lived in Chatham since August 24,1979. Our house has the raised slab, but not the roof over. We have many times wished our home had a porch in front. Now we fmd that we cannot, even though many of our neighbors already have a similar porch. . We really think this is unfair. We would like to request an exception for the residents of the neighborhood known as Chatham (Chatham Avenue, McCracken Lane, Chatham Court, Chatham Circle)_ We would like to see the same rules used just for our neighborhood as were previously (late 1970's) used by the builder, BanCon Homes (now Hans Hagen Homes). Thank you very much, ~~-~L ~ Mr. and Mrs. Kenneth L. Houston 1651 Chatham Avenue Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112 (651) 636-6658 . ~ r . ~~ W;/'f\t.- '-H \ ,-r\ 30' SG\e> ~c.tJ. '\ D t-\~ v-{\\'<\ c>,,~\\p.~ €:~G\<.VAC~\NL\ ON S t ,\S /K..iL . Sf; s: ~ (>i C~ '5tf'iZ"~. i i I . - --._~---, rf~. 0/ !f~ , C. R_ W1NDEN & ASSOCIATES, INC lAND SURVEYORS r... 645- 3646 For: 1381 EUSTIS Sf.. ST. "AUt, MINN. 55108 BAN-CON. INC , ! fJ -li Scale 1" = 30' N I ). 9 JC Mb " , " , ODenotes Iron I X "- '-~ ~~ rvo-S 1 .\~, ,s.' '\ Cu \ I (l ,- -? L_ , r , "- . "- (' ,.y RECEIVED Aj/^- ~ AUG 28 19i9 'rt; BAN-CON, IHe. -1J.: ~* Lot 7. Block 4. Chatham Fourth c:-~ Addition, Ramsey County. "- Minnesota WE tiUHY CERTIfY THAT THIS tS A TRUE AND COIRECT UPRESENrATlON Of A SURVEY Of THE &QUNO....'ES Of THE L...ND ...aoVE OESC.I&EO "'NO Of TtiE lOCATION Of ALL WILDINGS. If ANY. THUEON. AND All VISlllE ENCRO"'CtiMENTS. IF "'NY. FROM OR ON SAID lAND, 001..1 tit;. ~3 rd day of 11 or: I .0..0, 1979 c. l!. WINOEN & "'SSOCIATES, INC- . House , 2'7, jgIJg-I?IIf/../3.. L ocoltXI June 1f~~ loy ..11 '''''1 Su...,..... M.........to RllIliorroliofl No. JI19i/? 1S3'- 13 1.7 [;1/ . ~O\'f'e- . }~Pi\ -.J--/OUJ....'D L-\'iJ...€= p.. ~ btz-Clrt 1~t-l.\D 'c\~ r / o f.i f?f>>C'l... ':J'f'f PI 'f\ PlA\0e> su (2.\J G--j . l2-. s . ,. " r'~"'::.t.,.-<;>{",,~ '""" """,~:~~,~" "_~W"__. "'~~-"'i~~~,,",= C'""'"",",_;o;,,,,:__,4.. -;", .... "'~ (,;':'l''An"S"~T,';'"'';'} ,4IRTlfICATE Qf, SURVEY ~ ~ , ;J , ~ r: I .~;":"'''' IH j'<'a/$!/"~J$~ N ' ".' '..' l ~ , QL'l-"l'wi""s kti/l ! \ I i ~"* ! j -- _ _ ":9.>- l ii' -:SO:: I " .,rf" ~ t ~.... ::7 , 0" t ~ I " ~ \ A " <"-.:<'- i . , -'':'-...,.. '" / J }, ~/.x"-.., )' -""': ?~ ~ ',- ~/ ~ // "'---'.... ~ '~ /f ''-X '--- ! I , //-..c:>~ ' / ' & "_,, f1y~~.I}(}/}a ..c" ~,/ "_~",,, .I % .....-..::::: / ~~ I ' ~ c," -, v, ::-J> ~ lJ . c:>~ ..'~ I ! ,r ,iF p~ 'I ~ Dl i ; " !~/ i I , , , I --....< .. ' I I ~ ~v' , , . \ \ J I , I~ \ i '. , { \ I ~ --1 .. \ ~ __---~r-/ ~ \ -' , I ! \ .-' ..... .- ---" ".' i I , .IV \ .-~ ~. "c-/t;[/tT' I , ,-' ~ ['1-'C REQIlIVED ~ , :>i i \) JUtlf 9 .. lSiG 'i ~ , ~ hN<C0f4. If<IC. .. ~, i , * .- 1. ~ IT Ra: ~J 'suta. j 1 t .. r j ~ ~; "- t., , ~ -..'" ! ~ ~ .. 1 >'~, fiey certify that thhl, a true and corrlc1 reprU&flfalionof QSUf'H:Y of tht E, G. FWD a SONS, lNC, atiu ~dth. aooitt datedbliid I GfH1 a.nd ot Hit 1ocafton of an b!,JUdiO~St if a.nY1 LAND SURVEYORS th,ri:Ot'l,ufld dJ! 'i'il!bll t!itfoachrtri!\t! i If oP)' I horn or or. said JeDeL E, G. fWD a SONS, INC. 3847 155 th Avenue N.E Jro' ",' Anoka, Minnesota 55303 ttia:j fhll 2-._~tfey or,..;..i..o:<~:2f,._ t9~f,~' b}"C;~~____~"'.::~~~~_:,,:,:;:='.d _~~_ Tel: 434~'" €505 r , ~ ~~-""<...",, MtnrLREQ. No?;~..p4,~_ _ 1-~',"__;~<''''''''- "''''.--' :r /3op~ tv 8/ Et<Dfb~ FQ.CNT t6r<a-i '" , OCA1' C>N >It NIfoW 4. $tl>!! ...,....U< r ~ N "/.e ~~~ J IGawr J~SOH V "'-~ 1"~!oD I 'Sl~'~- St)$Z ~ 0:: t~ LC>c..A. TI ON 01=' ~~ ~'_,," K ~2.' ~> J:;~Oi'o/T New s,tJ i f.Jg ~H- rrOOlle. Polld.. IZooF # . \ rf' GaJ<ag€- G<t6le ~l' i ~ rE---------.. \ "","All&' ~&i~~~oI" \ "51-C.34- 1a&.~ U~~\JI5T '!" \ 'St-t:..33-)&'l '# \ __- -;- -- '-'. '. J \ _--- ~~ \ ---- \. ---- \- - - - l(t IU. e.>>i!.t'lllN T I :; J :i 'O",,~ I -" 3704 CtfATHAMCI~O }3 HIIL_ kAAML.fNq~ ,., JOAN Fu~ _Lor 5 r 6L.c;Ja,,2.) CI-lA'l't+AM Fiesr A60ITlON , ~SIO" ~, MN . Tn ~~~ 6BZeZ6Lt9l ~0Z~~6L€9! LZ:6t S~Gtft:/LO f ,(~!fe;(. i/lalveled tV/M /- I ~, ~lteafliPA 1tP elf' 37tJ~ ~ (jl;ee!e - . ~tJ/) r ~k'a.t) ~~~il-( /?J~~ -f't:' t?e ebV7.5~t/e/8::! ' of /la.fe.<il:iJs e t)/J;5r:; Ie/! f lU/M eXi5~~ ~lxva;f,rJL-e.J ~Je~e ~I'.Aa/;I- GJ'1!!es /?? #l~ A~~ - (!e~ $r'ct~ tv / i,( Ja#-'t'Y/..S e>/) h&/I ~/4; - a~ tJA.J e/1ds ~r #~ R~ - 6./,~ //At4' ;/0 /Yla.reA Aotl$e (' 6a~k .sye;J - 6,('6 (!~A... ;JOYs c.u/J;( /K /RIff] aedlmd ~ase ~ ~r- T&,f7 - R;ve rfea.cl<2c1 e& -- &d,~ ecf~ a~daA- deel41J' WI-M Oeda.e $,.(:;e/ aRoi/hd" . jJe/li/nefeA!... - ,AI~ l?cul ~.e t.Oa/~ - 6Nh~ 2rt2N M~A1 pL'/~ Iv ~. ~ti:le$ ~P7~. 4Jt7r aJ/// sm/ lTt/.51 '€'kw 6eet)/ld ;L;6",.e W//l~WS_ NeU/ eedcve c5kt-<e ..5/;/;/1..1 FAPn RtPOF </-~ StJr!i'{- t9,<..J ~ & ~)'tPt:J~ . ,A/et.-V (!edt!r/l. 6~ 6/dv(/ &kJ ~:J'€ gc:tAte-- To rnaTeA cedP~e /,tJAb/f, ~t1JtO,c;eA:.s C{~e Re jJa/"l)4~ 'h"Ie 4t:'vse qo- ?VitI' do m e 6'~e tu'/h1 jJ;;9~e4 fr; ,41a~ Gable &,0 jJ6J~cA w/II (]&~Ir';1-e/l r (/Cl..eqye gt:l6k- /l/celC( ~ a/.5o e-h/nl/Jal-es itk/v - 5/Je; "<./ - e k- J=j{ 0 /Y1 fa It'/ly t!:J/l Jk..4jlJ1e... {;/J fm//l!/ /it<G/Y} slaeeO~~ ,!)/} ;::;M y. . /.a/1ch~/'!1 tlj,fl k doAe Q"'~ OO/16;)etA:!;4O/J To C!O#7.#lefe ;:Jl?oJeel ~r Ao#leCJuPA.leA?u. ,7__ ji". <. " ..,:',} '_ Mil 'tR.- Redl~v/>1.f ~j(I'&I,~ ~ f ~l?J( Y' C5/cle/; fes q. ,,',Jsltvt~ /t.Iew. o'(/shy C5MvJ~ C/I M~MI- tpr Ao(/~e ~ ~e 1?.e/l1d'ved a.s U/e/l q.s: Mtt9/<Vile ~;l- eA:/ &p Aoose - Re~I/1/~ 7!i0t2r?S <efa. /:.u M.o/lT tja.< d *' "R..un~l/AJ ~/1d,<57't/;e6ed . . : I ~~~ 1~~ ~::E- ~.- B I - - I i I "- i , I ! .- \ ! ~ I ~ \ """ i r - ---- -)f2:rl -;; T ~ \ .',c, --'-'~::;-1 , '. i' .... .... <;-"l::t ' ~- ~j I II.Lt Ii! ll;Q I , ---- ...' 'd ----:=: t-",. .S[r.sn -'s . 6------.=, ", ._~~.__.-:-~ -' , ~ . I ,-,.. ..---. ~ ... ~.... )> ~~; 4<C)+ ~~ ! .. "'; .. !" :::! ~ ",(0 ~1~ ;-: ............/ , n I " I . !%\l) ~ I _ t~ I 1 ~~ 1 i IT , -.-. , ! I ! ;l~ I I ' ! c( , l' I i , i ; I I ~ 1 1 - _J .l,.. , "---' I ~ I i I I , .. (h : .- C I , , . i I i , , , I I - i I , ~ ] , J i -f b--~. ~_d- - , i - f= - I ir! I I lJ.. . 1 , .,,> ..."..j,'"..,,,.. ">," ......y t . h.... "'>"~",/"""""<";'-M""""'>'"'''' ...',i.e]!:......',,"'''' j,j."',.,;.."....,;... f''''''>.,.~ ."" .... .....,. ,.,.. . ..........1i1ll'lTilf ! 11 LiL. ">'<"""'li'~1 "'....,,'........,.' ~Ct:l~.K..;,.."x.'''''..A.TP''k,W',....,....,'' , . .-.._---- __C'-'._". '-,.- ---...._- ~-_... . ~ ~ ~ ....... += ~ ... c. - ~ .i~.C ~'': '- ~ .... .I .~ - ~ ...., <:t . ~ ~ ;.]~ " -, fS" .. <r::.\ - f) ": ~ 1< . ::i \ a Q,.. .... - \ - \-- ~ ... -... 1. ~ ~1~ a: . t!; . ~ .-j I - s. ._ ~A3 - . ......., .- "'. "l J ... i. .!! - \ ~~ ~~ ~~<;) Q1 ~ 1_ - '" :li '€~i ~~ :s 1 '"' ~... .c-:~ - - , $"' l.>- I . N It) I r, ~ ,i ~~ :0:: - , ~ It) }/i ; .... 3 I ~ i I , I ; ~~ I I~ H ~ - <>( ~ " , ~ . I I , . , .." I "- qj ., ~ 1 ~'J ' .. "n ~ - \oJ <.I I ~.~ (.> I -::t: ~J-l N ! - lot I ~ I~~ +--1Il ~ I -- ~ ~ e ~ - I - <:1\ ..., I ~ <\- t) t1l ~. I ~ "') ~ ~.~ 'la\ 1 ~ - I l>> - )C. <\l i . '- .g . "- I I C. ; , I ~1. I i , , ~.: I - - . t ~, . , \0 .-- -".- .- -. - - -- - - . 1'1 P \CAL r\O\"'f\E-~ IN c.-\:-\p.,;,1A,.p.fl"\. Wl\V\ OU~i-t-\APb' . . , 1 . ....~...,"i;",.'.~ . . "'" . . Planning Commission Meeting September 7, 2005 . Attachment 3c - 3 . . . ~ ~~HILLS CITY OF ARDEN HILLS COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 357 AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO COVERED ,FRONT PORCHES AS PERMITTED ENCROACHMENTS FOR SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED DWELLINGS THE ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL ORDAINS THAT SECTION 6(C)2(a) OF ARDEN HILLS ORDINANCE 291 IS AMENDED; AND SECTION 6(C)2(d) IS ADDED TO ARDEN HILLS ORDINANCE 291 TO READ AS FOLLOWS: Section 6(C)2(a), Parts of the Principal Structure. Features which are part of a principal structure, including but not limitcd to eaves, cantilevcred areas, cornices, canopies, awnings, balconies, fire escapes and chimneys, may extend three (3) feet into the required front, side, and rear setbacks but in no case shall these encroachments be less than six (6) feet from any lot line. . Decks, uncovered porches, ramps, and steps may extend six (6) feet into the required front, side, and rear sctbacks but in no case shall these encroachments be less than six (6) feet from any lot line. Required steps per thc International Codes shall be pennitted cncroachments Section 6(C)2(d). Covered Porches for Silll!le-Fami1v Detached Dwellin2s. 1. In requircd single-family residential front yard setbacks, covered porches attached to the principal structure may extend no more than 10 feet into the required front setback; provided that; the porch is no closer than 30 feet from the front lot line (excluding required steps per the International Rcsidential Code), the porch complies with the side yard interior setbacks, the design ofthc porch is consistent with the City's Porch Design Guidelines, and the porch has been approved by the Community Development Director or Development Director's designee. TIle Community Development Director or Development Director's designee must make the following Ijndings to approve a porch encroachmcnt of up to 10 feet: (a) The exterior materials of the proposed porch are consistent or complementary in color, texture, and quality with those visiblc at the front of the dwelling; (b) The roof of the proposed porch is properly proportioned to and integrated with the roof of the dwelling and has no less than a 3/12 slope; . , , , (c) The base of the porch is not opcn; the base shall be either a masonry perimeter . foundation (note: frost footings will be required for a building permit), or be s~Teened by a solid fascia consistent with the front of the home or lattice with openings no larger than 2 inches x 2 inches and painted to be consistent with the front of the home. (d) At least sixty five (65) percent of the exposed porch fayade (excluding the foundation) is open or occupied by screens and/or screen doors; and the fayade constitutes the area from the floor level of the porch to the porch ceiling; up to thirty five (35) percent ofthc fayadc may be solid and may only be occupied by columns, spindles, and railings; solid walls (even partial) are prohibited, (e) Building Permits shall be required bcfore construction can begin. 2, In required single-family rcsidential side-yard corner setbacks, covered porches attached to the front of a principal building facing the side yard corner setback may extend no more than ten (10) feet into the required side-yard corncr setback, provided that; the porch is no eloser than thiliy (30) fcct from thc side-yard comer lot line (exeluding required steps per the International Residential Code), that the design of the porch is consistent with the City's Porch Design Guidelines, and the porch has approved by thc Community Dcvelopment Director or Development Director's designce. The Community Dcvelopment Director or Development Director's designee must make the findings requircd by Section 6.C.2.d.l, letters (a)-(e) as listed above in ordcr to approve a . porch encroachment of up to ten (10) feet. Effcctive Date. This Ordinance shall becomc cffcctive the 19th day of May, 2005. Adoption Datc. Passed by the City Council of the City of Arden Hills the 9th day of May, 2005. .~-~- BEVERLY APLlKOWSK1, MAYOR ATTEST: M1CllELLE WOLFF CITY ADMINISTRATOR Publication Date. Published on thc of ,2005. . 2 . Planning Commission Me_eting September 7, 2005 Attachment 3c - 4 . . ~ . ~fIILLS CITY OF ARDEN HILLS COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 05-29 RESOLUTION AMENDING APPENDIX A OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 291 TO INCLUDE DESIGN GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES FOR FRONT PORCHES AS ENCROACHMENTS INTO FRONT AND SIDE YARD CORNER SETBACKS WHEREAS: Arden Hills has adopted new regulations allowing front porches in front and side-yard corner setback areas subject to certain conditions. WHEREAS: These regulations include a specific procedure and design guidelines for porches proposed to encroach in the front yard or side-yard corner setback areas up ten feet but in no case leaving a setback of less than thirty feet from the porch to the property lines. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: That the Council of the City of Arden Hills . directs staff to include in Zoning Ordinance No. 291, Appendix A, the design guidelines and application procedure for porches which encroach into the front and side-yard corner setback areas. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN IIILLS THIS lIth DAY OF APRIL, 2005. Beverly Aplikowski, Mayor ATTEST: Michelle A. Wolfe, City Administrator \\Earth\A.dmin\C[;undl\Resolutions\2005\05-26. Approving Support of Stale legislatin' 10 SecorI' Planning Funds lor 1-35 Stud)'.doc . --- ---- . COVERED PORCH ENCROACHMENTS AND COVERED PORCH ENCROACHMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES A. CITY REVIEW PROCEDURE L Applicant reviews proposal with City Planner before plans are finalized. 2. Applicant submits application and submission documents to the City. 3. Community Development Director or their designee reviews application and rcview the findings to detennine compliance with City rcgulations 4. The Community Development Dircctor or their designee provides a written review of application to the City Building Official and the applicant. 5. If the Community Development Director or their designcc has approved the porch addition the applicant may submit an application for a building permit. B. SUBMISSION REOUlREMENTS WRITTEN STATEMENT L The applicant shall provide a written dcscription of the proposed covered front porch encroachment including; the general style and form of the porch, roof materials, exterior wall materials, floors and interior materials, ceiling materials, colwnn . materials, spindle and railing materials, and base materials, to provide an accurate description of the proposed covered front porch encroachment and demonstratc compliance with the City's covered porch encroachment design guidelines. OTHER CONSJDERA TIONS L Photographs showing the location of the proposed covercd porch encroachment. 2. Elevations or renderings of the proposed covered porch encroachment. 3. Other plans, as appropriate to requcst. SURVEY: 'lbe applicant shall provide the City with a survey showing the property lines, existing setbacks and proposed setbacks so that City staff may detennine i I' the proposed covered porch encroachmcnt is compliant with City Covered Front Porch Encroachment Design Guidelines and Zoning Ordinance Regulations. Surveys shall include the following: 1. The date, north point, map scale, name and addrcss of the applicant, owner, operator, surveyor, engineer and designer, including thcir license nwnbers and seals; 2. A correct boundary survey and legal dcscription of thc subject property made and certified to by a registered Land Surveyor indicating total acreage of site; 3. Depiction of all watercourses, lakes, marshes, wooded areas, rock outcrops, power transportation poles and lines, gas Iincs, single trces with a diameter of eight (8) . inchcs or more as measured three (3) feet abovc thc base ofthe trunk, and any other . significant existing features; 4. Delineation of topography of subject property with contour intervals of not more than two (2) fcct and supplemental of one (I) foot in extremely flat areas, the data for which shall be derived from the fifth general adjustment of 1929; 5. The location, right-of-way width, dimensions and names of existing or dedicated streets or other public lands, permanent buildings and structures, easements, section and corporate Jines within the subject property and wjthin a distance of onc hundred (100) feet from thc property boundaries; 6. Descriptions, reference ties and elevations of all benchmarks; 7. Location of all monuments existing at thc time of the survey, and those which the surveyor shaH havc located at the comers of the subject property; 8. Rcfcrcnce to and relations of municipal, township, county or section lines to lines of the subject property by distances, anglcs, radii, internal angles, points and curvatures, tangent bearings and lengths of all arcs; and 9. Boundary lincs of adjoining property within one hundred (100) fect, idcntifying owners. SITE PLAN Sufficient detail to clearly show the conditions of the property, the location of the proposed porch, and the area surrounding the proposed porch. TIlis may be shown on the surveyor included as a separale document Plans should bc drawn to scale (engineer's or architect's . scale) not less than V. inch to one foot; and the scalc shall be listed on the plans. Please also includc the following: L Principal building Jocation(s), dimensions and setbacks. 2, Accessory building localion(s), dimensions and setbacks. 3, Calculation of total building coverage. 4, Calculation or imperviouslhard surface coverage. 5. Driveway and sidcwalk location. 6. Fences and retaining walls. 7. Shoreland boundaries, if applicable (including official OHW elevation), 8. Wctland boundaries, if applicable, DRAINAGE PLAN L Existing and generalized proposed drainage facilities 2. Potential ponding areas STRUCTURAL PLANS L Sketchcs or illustrations indicating the architectural treatmcnt of the proposed covcrcd porch encroachment . C. COVERED FRONT PORCH DESIGN GUIDEl.INES . The follO\ving are general design guidelines and criteria that will help you in the planning, design, and constmction of your porch addition. Porches that encroach into the front or side-yard comer setback areas shall he required to meet the following design guidelines and shall require approval of the Community Development Director or their designee prior to any building pcmlits being issued (per Section Cl.C.2.d of the Zoning Ordinance). General Form The fonn of your porch addition is the outcr shape created by the exterior walls and roof. The form of thc addition should be appropriate and compatiblc to the form of your existing home. Base of the Porch Thc base of the porch is not open, the base shall be either a masonry perimeter foundation, providing for proper drainage; or bc screened by a solid tascia consistcnt with the front of the home or lattice with openings no larger than 2 inchcs by 2 inches and painted to be consistent with the front of the home, Ceiljngs Open-air porches must have ceilings of durable grade materials such as beadboard or painted or stained wood. Columns Structural columns should be clad in finish grade, wood trim or be a decorative shape that is compatible with the design of the existing house, The columns should be expressed on the exterior of thc porch to help articulate the porch I,,,;adc, Exterior 'Valls The exterior walls are considered to be those exterior surfaccs from the floor line to the ceiling of the . porch, This surface is to be at least 65 percent open and no more than 35 pcreent solid. The open surfaccs are to he open air or occupied hy screens, and/or scrcen doors. Ine solid surfaces are to be exterior materials that are consistent or complementary in color, texture, and quality to those of the /i-ont of the existing home, Solid surfaces may only includc columns, spindles, and railings; solid walls (even partial) are prohihited. Floors Open-air porches must have 1100rs of durable exterior grade materials such as concrete, painted or stained solid wood, high quality composite materials, or brick. Railings The height and spacing of railing must meet the requirements of the International Building Code. Acceptable railing materials are painted or staincd wood, high quality composite materials, and painted metal. The design ofthc railing assembly should be compatible with the details of the existing house. Roofs The roof or your porch addition should be properly proportioned in shape and pitch to the rooflincs of the existing house, Roofing materials should match as closely as possible to tbe materials of the exis.ting home. Landscaping Integrating your porch addition into your yard is as important as its integration to your house, Plant materials and landscape features should transition the porch into your yard, providing a visual hase. Landscaping could also be placed along the cntry path, . , . Planning Commission Meeting -~-~-- -.--.- -----.---- September 7,2005 . Attachment 3c - 5 . . DRAFT - DRAFT - DRAFT - DRAFT - DRAFT - DRAFT - DRAFT ,DRAFT-DRAFT . ~ ~ILLS CITY OF ARDEN HILLS COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 366 AN ORDINANCE ADDING TO PREVIOUS LANGUANGE RELATING TO COVERED FRONT PORCHES AS PERMITTED ENCROACHMENTS FOR SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED DWELLINGS THE ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL ORDAINS THAT SECTION 6(C)2(d)3 IS ADDED and SECTION 6(C)2(d) OF ARDEN HILLS ORDINANCE 291 IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: Section 6(C)2(d), Covered Porches for Sin21e-Fami1v Detached Dwcllin2s. . 1. In rcquired single-family residential front yard setbacks, covered porches attached to the principal structure may extend no more than 10 feet into the required front setback; provided that; the porch is no closer than 30 feet from the front lot line (excluding required steps per the 1ntcrnational Residenlial Code), the porch complies with the side yard interior setbacks, the design of the porch is consistent with the City's Porch Design Guidelines, and the porch has been approved by the Community Development Director or Developmcnt Director's designee. The Community Development Director or Developmcnt Director's designee must make the following findings to approve a porch encroachment of up to 10 feet: (a) The exterior materials of the proposed porch are consistent or complementary in color, texture, and quality with those visible at the front of the dwelling; (b) The roof ofthc proposed porch is properly proportioned to and integrated with the roof of the dwelling and has no less than a 3/12 slope; (c) Thc base of the porch is not open; the base shall be either a masonry pcrimcter foundation (note: frost footings will be required for a building permit), or be screened by a solid fascia consistent with the front of the home or lattice with openings no larger than 2 inches x 2 inches and painted to be consistent with the front of the home. . --.--- (d) At least sixty five (65) percent of the exposed porch fayade (cxcluding the . foundation) is open or occupied by screens and/or scrccn doors; and the fayade constitutes the area from the floor level of the porch to the porch ceiling; up to thirty five (35) perccnt of the fayade may be solid and may only be occupied by columns, spindles, and railings; solid walls (even partial) are prohibited. (e) Building Permits shall be required bcfore construction can begin. 2. In required single-family residential side-yard comer setbacks, covered porches attached to the front of a principal building facing thc side yard comer setback may extend no more than ten (10) feet into the required side-yard comer setback, provided that; thc porch is no closcr than thirty (30) feet from the side-yard corner lot linc (cxcluding required stcps per the Intemational Residential Code), that the dcsign of the porch is consistent with the City's Porch Design Guidelincs, and the porch has approved by the Community Development Director or Development Director's designee. Thc Community Devclopmcnt Director or Development Director's designee must make the findings requircd by Section 6.C.2.d.1, letters (a)-( e) as listed abovc in order to approve a porch encroachment of up to ten (10) feet. 3~ I~Jrequired single-family residentiaFffbntof side-vardcorn~rsetbacks,where the /?fQuertieswere platted withfronlsetbacksorside-vard cOrnerset~acks,lt;Ssthan. forty (~gJ:feetand were estab1ishedthough~PI3l111~dlJnit DevelopmentofSpeciaIlJse P!lfillit :",~iell.\Vas approved bv the CitvC?l'llIcil.C(jveredporches att~c~edt~rthejJ-ollt~f'a . pril1Ftpalbuilding may extendnoll~~Tethlillten,.. ( 1 O),feetintortM,;;fi0lIl of,.,sidec yard c~rn~rsetback, provided that, the,"C(jvef~dporchis llo.dosert~~':~""entycfive(25)feet 11-o.mt~c ,front lot line ( excluding reqlliredst~~'pcr the lnternation~I:'~~~identialCode). t~~~Wedesign, of the' porch is, consistellt'-ViththeCitY's.,PorchD~sig(l:Il'J\1i4elint;S.alld'the p{)r~~,~as . approved bv thc5{)l1lmIlnityoevelopment DiTector'{)f;t~~Deve10pmellt ].}i~e~()r's. designee. The CommullitvDevelopmentDirector0r~evelopllientDirector's ~~~eemust make the findingsreQuite<ill"Sedion 6.c.2.dA,I~tters'(aHe)as listed alIDveitlorder to approve a porchencroachm,ellt,ofup.to tenJIO)[eet; Effective Date, This Ordinance shall become effective lhe_th day of ,2005. Adoption Date. Passed by the City Council ofthc City of Arden Hills the th day of ,2005, BEVERLY APLlKOWSK1, MAYOR ATTEST: MICHELLE WOLFE CITY ADMINISTRATOR . 2 . . Publication Date. Published on the of._ ,2005. . e 3