The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPCP 08-03-2005 Chair ~ 1245 W. Highway 96 David Sand ~HILLS Arden Hills, MN 55112 Commissioners 651.634.5120 Ken Bezdicek www.ci.arden-hills.mn.ns Clayton Larson Arden Hills Dave McClung Planning Commission Liz Modesette Roberta Thompson Wednesday, AU2ust 3, 2005 Clavton Zimmerman City Vision A strong community that values our uniqne environment, our fiscal soundness, and our tradition as a desirable citv.in which to live, work, and plav. . Agenda Planning Commission Convenes 7:00 PM Call to Order 1. AGENDA 2. l\flNUTES A. July 6, 2005 Meeting 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS 4. UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS A. Planning Case 05-18: William Mitchell, 3568 Ridgewood Court, Arden Hills, MN, 55112; Minor Subdivision and Lot Consolidation. 5. REPORTS 6. ADJOURNMENT A quorum of the City Council may be present at this meeting. . . Draft MINUTES DRAFT CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION . WEDNESDAY, JULY 6,200S 7:00 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY HALL CALL TO ORDER Chair Sand called the meeting to order at 7:10 p.m. DRAFT ROLL CALL Present were Commissioners Clayton Larson, Ken Bezdicek, Elizabeth Modesette, Clayton Zimmerman, Roberta Thompson, David McClung, and Chair David Sand. Absent: None. Also present were Mayor Beverly Aplikowski, Councilmember David Grant, Community Development Director, Scott Clark, City Planner Peter Hellegers, City Engineer Greg Brown, and Recording Secretary Kathleen Altman. A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JUNE 1. 200S. . Commissioner Zimmerman requested the following ehanges: Page 14, second paragraph from the bottom, first sentence should read: "Commissioner Zimmerman stated he believed with the additional five recommendations given tonight by staff and the comments made at this public hearing, this needed to be tabled for further evaluation." Commissioner Thompson requested the following changes: Page 3, delete the ninth paragraph from the top. Page 6, second paragraph from the bottom, last sentence change considerable to considerably. Page 7, last paragraph, 9th sentence, change smaller to smaller. Page 8, third paragraph, second sentence, change work to worked. Page 13, last paragraph, 11 th sentence, change are to area. Commissioner Zimmerman moved, seconded by Commissioner Larson to approve the June 1, 2005 minutes as amended. The motion carried unanimously (7-0). B. INFORMATION ITEM 1. MnDOT/Ramsev County Radio Tower Reconstruction proiect (across Lake Valentine Road from MVHS) Mr. Hellegers stated the radio tower was owned by the State of Minnesota and a . representative [rom MnDOT was in attendanee to discuss this. Lynn Ness, System Engineer MnDOT, summarized their plans to replace the existing tower on 1929 Lake Valentine Road. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - JULY 6, 2005 2 , PUBLIC HEARINGS . A. PLANNING CASE #05-17: PRESBYTERIAN HOMES, 2845 HAMLINE AVENUE N. #100, ROSEVILLE, MN; SUP AMENDMENT FOR MCKNIGHT CARE CENTER ADDITION (3220 LAKE JOHANNA BL YD.) Mr. Hellegers stated applieants were requesting a Special Use Permit Amendment for an addition to the south end of the McKnight Care Center on the Presbyterian Homes property in Arden Hills. Staff recommended approval of the Special Use Permit Amendment for the Presbyterian Homes, after making a finding that the special use will not have an adverse impact on the surronnding properties or on the community as a whole, based on the following conditions: L Revised Final Plans. The applicant shall submit revised plans, responsive to the comments from the Plan review Comments section of staff s report (9), contained in City Planning File #05-12, for review and approval by the City Planner, City Engineer, and City Building Official, prior to issuance of building permits. 2. Landscaping Plans. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan for review and approval by the City Planner prior to the issuance of any occupancy permit. 3. Screening of Mechanical Overating Equipment. All mechanical operating equipment shall be screened to meet City regulations. . 4. Noise Level of Meehanical Overating Equipment. All meehanical operating equipment shall meet the City regulations for noise levels. If the City Council determines that the noise level from the mechanical operating equipment is not meeting City regulations for noise levels; the applicant shall be required to reduce the noise levels from the mechanical operating equipment. 5. Proteetive Fencing on the Retaining Wall. Protective fencing shall be erected at the top of the retaining wall. Fencing may be decorative (wrought iron) or a vinyl coated chain link style fencing (suggest black, brown, or dark green). 6. Exeeution of an SUD Amendment Permit. Execution of an SUP Amendment Permit drafted by the City Attorney and approved by the City Council prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 7. Necessarv Approvals from Other Agencies. The applicant shall obtain all neeessary permits from the Rice Creek Watershed District, Ramsey County, State of Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and any other governing ageneies where applicable. Chair Sand opened the public hearing at 7:28 p.m. Chair Sand invited anyone for or against the variance to come forward and make comment. There were no comments made. . Chair Sand closed the public hearing at 7:29 p.m, ----------- ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - JULY 6, 2005 3 Commissioner Bezdicek asked if the brick would be consistent with the existing building. e John Mehrkens, Presbyterian Homes, replied the brick would be matched as close as possible, He noted the building should look very consistent. Commissioner Modesette asked ifthere had been a neighborhood meeting. Mr. Hellegers replied there had been a neighborhood meeting with 12 to 14 residents in attendance. Commissioner Modesette asked if there would be anything further other than plantings along the top of the retaining wall. Mr. Mehrkens replied staff had recommended a fence on the top of the retaining wall, which they would comply with. Commissioner McClung asked on the rooftop terrace, what type of fencing would there be and how wide were the posts going to be. He indicated he was concerned about screening the terrace. Mr. Mehrkens replied the top floor would have a vertical slatted fence, to bring in light and allow residents to look out as well. He stated the fence would sit on a knee wall, which would sit 2-3 feet off of the finished floor. He indicated they would use this only during staff supervised times. He stated there would be planter pots and a garden that would be used as an activity, as well as a screening use. He noted the closest point to a residential home would be 210 feet. Commissioner McClung asked if the low level hedges would be removed. Mr. Mehrkens replied they intended on keeping the hedges where they were. . Commissioner Thompson asked how successful did they think they would be in relocating the large trees. Mr. Mehrkens stated after further analysis, a couple of the trees were diseased and would need to be removed, but the trees they could remove and relocate they would and if those trees did not live, they would be replaced with like trees of reasonable size. Commissioner MeClung moved, seconded by Commissioner Modesette that the Planning Commission considered the effect of the proposed use based upon the health, safety, convenience and general welfare of the owners and occupants of surrounding land, in particular, and the community as a whole, in general, including but not limited to the following factors: existing and anticipated traffic and parking conditions; noise, glare, odors, vibration, smoke, dust, air pollution, heat, liquid or solid waste, and other nuisance characteristies; drainage; population density; visual and land use compatibility with uses and struetures on surrounding land; adjoining land values; park dedieations where applieable, and the orderly development of the neighborhood and the City within the general purpose and intent of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Development Plan for the City and reeommended approval of Planning Case No. 05-17, Presbyterian Homes, 2845 Harnline Ave. N. #100, Roseville, MN; SUP Amendment for McKnight Care Center Addition (3220 Lake Johanna Blvd.) subject to the seven conditions as outlined in staffs July 6, 2005 report. The motion carried unanimously (7.0). . UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS ---------- - ---- ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - JULY 6, 2005 4 A. PLANNING CASE 05-12: ROYAL OAKS REALTY. 1000 COUNTY ROAD E WEST, SHOREVIEW. MN: MASTER AND FINAL PUD AND PRELIMINARY . PLAT FOR OLD CITY HALL AND PUBLIC WORKS SITE (1440-1450 HIGHWAY 96) Mr. Hellegers stated applicant was requesting a Master and Final PUD and Preliminary Plat for the redevelopment of the old City Hal1/Public Works property as a 7 building, 30 unit, office condominium eomplex. Staff recommended approval of the Master and Final Planned Unit and Preliminary Plat subject to the following conditions: 1. Revised Final Plans. The applicant shall submit revised plans, responsive to the comments from the Plan Review Comments contained in City Planning File #05-12 for review and approval by the City Planner, City Engineer, and City Building Official, prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. Development Timeline. The applicant's timeline for development shall be as follows: - Phase 1: Summer 2005 - The developer may begin grading, installing utilities, and construction of storm water improvements. It is expected that construction on 3 buildings/l 6 units (presumably units 15-30), will also begin at this time. The 3 buildings/16 units are expected to be ready for occupancy by the spring of 2006. Phase 2; Summer - 2006 - The developer expects to begin construction on the remalmng 4 buildings/l4 units (presumably 1-14) with expected occupancy of these units by the spring of2007. Extensions beyond 2007 shall require application to the City Council for review and . approval. At the time of applieation for extension, the City Council may include such conditions of approval as they determine necessary for compliance with City Code. 3. Number of Businesses in a Unit. 30 office condominium uses have been proposed for development on individual lots. Only one business shall be permitted to occupy any one lot within the development. 4. Retail Uses. Retail uses shall not be allowed to occupy any of the units in the proposed development, exeept for incidental or accessory sales. 5. Restaurant Uses. Restaurant uses shall not be allowed to occupy any of the units in the proposed development. 6. Residential Uses. Residential uses shall not be allowed to occupy any of the units in the proposed development. 7. Landscaping Plans. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan for review and approval by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. The revised landscape plan shall include a mixture of eoniferous and deciduous trees along the west buffer yard of the development. The mixture of landscaping shall adequately screen the development from the residential properties to the west. 8. Tree Preservation. The applicant and their contractors shall work with the City Planner and City Forester to save as many existing, healthy, and well placed trees as possible in the areas designated as landscape space. 9. Signage. One freestanding monument sign at the Highway 96 entranee shall serve for the development. Wall signage within the development shall include 30 square feet for each unit shall be permitted in accordance with the City's Sign ordinance. Each . unit shall have 30 square feet including the I square foot address and name plaque adjacent to the main entry for the unit. The 30 square feet of signage may be on the side of the building or the front but not on the rear of the building. The unit signage of 30 square feet may be illuminated by small decorative lighting fixtures which ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - JULY 6, 2005 5 . comply with the City's lighting standards. The building housing units 26-30 shall be permitted to have one 60 square foot, internally illuminated sign which faces Highway 96 to the north. This building shall be limited to 30 square feet on either the west or south sides of the building, so that the total building signage would not exceed 90 square feet. 10. Screening of Mechanical Operating Equipment. All mechanical operating equipment shall be screened to meet City regulations. 11. Decorative Fencing to Surround the Pond. Decorative painted fencing (like painted wrought iron fencing) shall be erected around the pond at the northeast comer of the property to protect pedestrians from falling into the pond. 12. Exeeution of a PUD Permit. Execution of a PUD Permit drafted by the City Attorney and approved by the City Council prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 13. Park Dedication. Satisfaction of the park dedication requirements as approved by the City Council in the amount of $40,000.00. 14, Final Plat. The applicant shall submit an application for a Final Plat within six (6) months following City Council approval ofthe PUD and Preliminary Plat. 15. Necessary Approvals from Other Agencies. The applicant shall obtain all necessary permits from the Rice Creek Watershed District and Ramsey County. Commissioner Modesette asked if there had been any new information with respect to the turn radius for the entry drive. Mr. Hellegers replied there might be a little bit of additional space to work with, but it would not be 50-feet of additional space as recommended. He noted moving the pole was not something that had been discussed. . Commissioner Modesette asked if they had discussed with the developer the location of the windows on the south side. Mr. Hellegers responded he had not spoken with the developer regarding this and he requested the developer answer this question. Chair Sand asked if the entire site was zoned neighborhood business now. Mr. Hellegers replied it was approved as neighborhood business at the June meeting. Chair Sand stated the City had received several emails and other correspondence from residents, including a memorandum from Gale E. Van Buskirk at 1390 Arden View Drive, attaching a petition signed by 154 citizens opposing this project. Commissioner Thompson asked if there had been a new landscape plan submitted. Mr. Hellegers replied they had not received a landscape plan at this time, but one would be required before this would get final approval. Chair Sand invited anyone for or against the variance to come forward and make comment. Elwood F. Caldwell, 1451 Arden View Drive, stated he was commenting on behalf of the Board of Directors of Arden Hills North Homes Association. He presented his written comments: "This is in response to the eight.page memorandum dated July 6 containing . the staff reeommendations plus various attachments, to both of whieh we will refer, but more particularly to the 16 specific conditions for approval on pages 6 and 7. No. 1 stated in part that "The applicant shall submit revised plans, responsive to comments from the Plan Review Comments contained in City Planning File #05-12..." ----------- ____________n_ ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - JULY 6, 2005 6 [emphasis added]. Since we endorse those comments unequivocally, we believe that the revised final plans should comply with rather than be responsive to them. "Responsive" . according to the dictionary means "making answer or reply" or simply "answering." Nos. 2-8 are conditions on which we have no comment or with which we agree. No.9 deals with signage. Notwithstanding the 30 square foot maximum unit wall signage allowed by ordinance in the NB district, we previously recommended a maximum of 6 square feet, which has been ignored. Signage in a very similar Royal Oaks development in LakeviIIe, of which you have seen color photographs, currently appears to fall within that limit. In any event, unit wall signage should be limited to not over 15 square feet, wbich we understand units in the Lakeville development may be permitted. We also objeet strongly to the 60 square foot internally illuminated sign proposed to be allowed on the north wall of building 26-30 that would be visible over the holding pond from Highway 96. In our view it would detract substantially from the "townhome" appearance of the development. Nos. 10-15 are eonditions which we previously recommended and which received zero acknowledgment or attention in the July 6 staff recommendations. It deals with the problematie Hamline Aveuue/Karth Lake Circle/Site Access interseetion. At the very least, the plat should be revised to show larger than standard radii (50-foot recommended) on the northwest and southwest comers ofthat intersection as recommended by the traffic . study (on page 14 of Attachment 4b-3 to the June 1 staff recommendations) and concurred in by the Ramsey County traffic engineer Dan Soler as item 4 in his memorandum of May 20, 2005 (Attachment 4a-4 to the June 6 staff recommendations). If the project is approved, the additional condition should require construction of the radii at that intersection in the initial phase of development. In summarv, we continue to obiect to this proiect. but ask that if you recommend approval to the Citv Council, at the very least vou retain or strengthen the present staff conditions 2-8 and 10-15, and in addition: 1) In condition No.1, require compliance with and not merely responsive to the many comments from the Plan Review Comments section ofthe staff report; 2) In condition No.9, limit unit wall signage to not over 15 square feet and preferably not over six square feet, and delete permission for any sign on the north wall of units 25-30; 3) Add a condition No. 16 requiring that the recommended 50-foot radii at Hamline A venue be shown on the plat and be constructed in the initial phase of construction of the development." Commissioner McClung stated in order to construct a 50-foot radii would require some easement from the townhome association. He asked if the townhome association had discussed this. Dave Ehresman, 1481 Arden View Drive, President of Arden HiIIs Townhomes North, . stated they did not favor the lighted, illuminated sign on the building. With respect to the 50-foot radius curve he offered the townhome association was willing to negotiate an ------..---- ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - JULY 6, 2005 7 easement at no cost to the developer to allow a 50-foot radius to be incorporated into the . development. Connnissioner Larson asked if they would need to obtain right-of-way from the daycare also. Mr. Hellegers responded the Developer would need to work with Excel to move the pole and there might be a need to also obtain an easement from the daycare. Mr. Clark stated the other question they needed to discuss was that the traffic engineer study had discussed a 50-foot radius and this did not conform with other street intersections in the City. Mr. Brown stated a normal intersection had a 25-30 foot radius and he was not sure where the 50-foot reconnnendation eame from and they did not anticipate large truck traffic. He reconnnended as large of a radius as possible, but 50 feet appeared to be excessive and 25-30 would be more appropriate. Connnissioner Larson asked if this would stand out as being dissimilar to other streets that accessed Hamline. Mr. Brown replied it would. Dan Soler, Traffic Engineer Ramsey County Public Works Department, stated originally when he looked at the traffic study, he was not sure there was a number in it, but he agreed there should be some type of a radius on that corner. He indicated there are only two reasons why they would want a larger radius including a high number of semi.traetor . trailers using the access and to ensure that when vehicles are turning they end up on the correct side of the road. He reconnnended there be a reasonable radius, such as 25-30 feet. He noted there were no 50-foot radius on Hamline and Highway 96. Connnissioner Zinnnerman asked if the County had any guidelines with respect to radius. Mr. Soler replied they did and the radius ranged from 25-50 feet depending upon the factors, but he recommended a 25-30 foot radius for this development. Chair Sand asked if there was adequate access on Highway 96 to stripe the highway for the turn lane. Mr. Soler replied there was sufficient width for a turn lane and he reconnnended striping and signing be put into place. Chair Sand asked if there should be an acceleration lane for exiting vehicles. Mr. Soler responded there was not sueh a lane anywhere else on Highway 96 and typieally they did not use acceleration lanes on Highway 96 or any other County roads. Connnissioner Modesette inquired about "U" turns. Mr. Soler stated "U" turns were not an issue anywhere there were "U" turns at a protected signal. He acknowledged "U" turns in some areas were a problem and in some areas they were not and it depended upon the location. Connnissioner Zimmerman asked if there was any precedence in there being a sign some . number of feet before the entrance/exit to the property that indicated that there was traffic entering from the right. Mr. Solder replied signage such as this might be helpful. He stated they could look at the sight lines to see ifthis made sense. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - JULY 6, 2005 8 Chair Sand asked if there was anything that would prevent the driveway access to be laid out at a different location on Highway 96. Mr. Soler replied the driveway could not be . too close to where the right turn lane began at Hamline. Commissioner McClung noted the Hamline turn lane during rush hour did back up almost to this proposed driveway entrance. Commissioner McClung stated there was an issue with traffic on southbound Hamline during morning rush hour. Jim Hartsoe, President Townhouse Villages Homeowners Association South, 4430 Arden View Court, stated the traffic on Hamline was a big problem, especially between 7-9 a.m. He noted there was no light on Arden View Drive. He asked if people going north on Hamline be able to turn left into the development. He did not believe the traffic questions had been addressed well. He stated he had a concern about the number of businesses being proposed on the property. He expressed concern with respect to drainage. He stated the homeowners found it difficult getting and in out onto Hamline Avenue and asked this be taken into consideration. Kathy Sikano(?sp), Karth Lake Circle, expressed concern about the inability of people to turn left onto Karth Lake Circle off of Hamline during rush hour. She noted there was no left turn lane to allow people to turn into Karth Lake Circle. Diane Phillipi, 1442 Arden View Drive, expressed concern about the lanes merging . where the proposed driveway was going to be put. Cindy Owen, 4490 Hamline, expressed concern about the traffic increase on Hamline. She noted the traffic had grown immensely over the past years and she was concerned about the safety of the residents on Hamline Avenue. Gail Van Buskirk, 1390 Arden View Drive, stated she had submitted a petition with 154 signatures in opposition to this development. She indicated a lot of citizens were concerned about this. She stated she was concerned with the traffic study in that they tried to use the current traffic and foreeast future traffic, without addressing the increase of traffic with Guidant's development. She indicated the study also did not address the increased traffic onto all of the streets that exited onto Hamline Avenue. She noted no environmental impact statement had been done, but with the water and drainage concerns, she encouraged them to require an envirornnental assessment or impact statement to make sure those issues were under control. She asked them to deny this planning case. Susie Severson, 1345 Arden View Drive, expressed concern about the police traffic on Hamline Avenue and the safety of the ehildren in the area. Elwood Caldwell noted the traffic study had recommended a 50-foot radii and he believed this intersection was like no other interseetion in the City and needed that radii. . Terry Giel, 4534 Keithson Drive, stated making a "U" turn on Highway 96 was problematic. ~_.------ ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - JULY 6, 2005 9 Tony Tredal, 4521 Keithson Drive, stated she was opposed to this development. She . noted their home had been built by Royal Oaks Realty and she had experienced many problems with Royal Oaks Realty with them not complying with the City of Arden Hills requirements and Rice Creek Watershed District requirement. She noted this developer was not responsive and asked how the City could trust a company that had betrayed them in the past. Commissioner Thompson asked if the radius was 25-30 feet would it still be necessary to move the utility pole. Mr. Hellegers replied staff would need to look at this. Mr. Clark stated that more than likely the additional space for the radius would create the need for the driveway to have additional space to the south, outside of the easement. Commissioner Modesette asked if there was anyway to put in a dedieated turn lane for the driveway. Commissioner McClung recommended amendments to the conditions and wanted to add two additional recommendations. First, with respeet to signage, his eoneern was the variance for the signage. He stated they should allow a freestanding monument sign on Highway 96 and it should comply with the sign restrictions. Wall sign age should be within accordance with the City's sign ordinance standards. He was opposed to a large sign on the back of units 26-30 and recommended that language be struck from condition number 9. He noted he would not be in support of a sign variance. He expressed concern . about the trail to the west in that it was only 10 feet from the back of units 1,2 and 3. He proposed repositioning the buildings to allow a 20- foot setback from where the building ends to the traiL He believed there would be public safety concerns, as well as drainage concerns. He recommend a larger than standard radii with a minimum of 30-feet and allow the applicant to bring forth a proposal that the City would approve prior to the issuance of a building permit. Mr. Clark stated it was his understanding the PTRC was asked to look at this and he did not believe they had made a recommendation to move the buildings, but their concern was that the integrity of the trail be maintained. Commissioner Larson asked if the trail way was protected from the drainage plans submitted. Mr. Brown replied he did not remember that area being a concern, but this would be something they would look at further and the drainage should not adversely impact the traiL Commissioner Thompson asked if they should reeommend some type of lighting on the trail for the safety of the people walking the traiL Chair Sand noted they needed to balance the safety for the path users versus lighting issues for the homes by the trail. Commissioner McClung stated that was the reason he wanted a larger area between the buildings and the traiL . Mike Black, Royal Oaks Realty, stated they might have some room to make some adjustments between the buildings to add an additional five feet for the traiL ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - JULY 6, 2005 10 Commissioner McClung stated he would be willing to look at allowing some flexibility to the required parking because this was strictly office use, whieh would give more space . to the trail, more green space, and a larger setback for the homes on Keithson Drive. Chair Sand asked if they could put in some environmentally friendly lighting two or three feet off of the ground along the path. Commissioner Thompson asked if they could require them protecting the trail while construction was happening. Commissioner McClung moved, seconded by Commissioner Larson to recommend approval of Planning Case No. 05-12: Royal Oaks Realty, 1000 County Road E West, Shoreview, MN; Master and Final PUD and Preliminary Plat for Old City Hall and Public Works Site (1440-1450 Highway 96), subject to the conditions as noted in staffs July 6, 2005 report and adding the following amendment/conditions: Condition 9 to read - Signage: One freestanding monument sign at the Highway 96 entrance shall serve for the development which shall eonform to the City's Sign Ordinance restrictions. Wall signage within the development shall include 30 square feet for each unit in accordance with the City's Sign Ordinanee. Signage shall be limited to the front of the building. 16. Building Setback from City Trail: Units ],2, and 3 of the proposed development shall be set back at least 20 feet from the existing trail on the west side of the property. 17. Hamline A venue Entrance: To facilitate movement in and out of the development, a minimum 30- foot radii shall be built on the northwest and southwest corner of the interseetion. Revised entrance plans shall be submitted to the City Engineer and Ramsey . County Engineer for approval prior to the issuance of the building permits. 18. During construction ofthe development and post construction ofthe development, applicant shall provide plans to the City Engineer that will show how impact the City trail on the west side of the development shall be mitigated including a drainage plan to prevent erosion of the trail. Commissioner Bezdicek expressed concern with the 20-foot setback for the trail and requested this be revised to a 15. foot setback. Commissioner Bezdieek moved, seconded by Commissioner Thompson to amend Condition 16 to require a IS-foot setback for the trail, instead of a 20-foot setback. The motion carried (6.]) (Commissioner McClung opposed). Chair Sand noted Condition 16 would read IS-feet instead of20-feet. Commissioner Larson requested they amend Condition number] 8 that the developer is to provide low-level lighting for the trail behind the buildings subject to approval by the City Planner. Commissioner McClung aceepted the amendment. The motion carried (6-]) (Commissioner McClung opposed). REPORTS . A. Planning Commissioners , I ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - JULY 6, 200S 11 Chair Sand asked for an update on the monument signs. Mr. Clark responded this was . progressing along. B. Staff None. C. Council Member Council Member Grant updated the Commission on recent City Council actions. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Zimmerman moved, seeonded by Commissioner Thompson to adjourn the meeting at 9:43 p.m. The motion carried unanimously (7-0). . . . ~ ~HlLLS MEMORANDUM DATE: August 3, 2005 PC Agenda Item 4.A TO: Planning Commission FROM: Peter Rellegers, City Planner!t.. SUBJECT: PC #05-18, William Mitchell 3568 Ridgewood Ct Minor Subdivision/Lot Consolidation Requested Action Consider the requested Minor Subdivision and Lot Consolidation. Backl!Tound Surrounding Area . , North Low Density Residential R-l: Single Family Residential Single Family Detached Residential South Low Density Residential R-l: Single Family Residential Single Family Detached Residential East Low Density Residential R.l: Single Family Residential Single Family Detached Residential West Low Density Residential R.I: Single Family Residential Single Family Detached Residential Site Data Low Density Residential Single Family Residential R-l: Single Family Residential .691 acres (30, I 00 square feet) Slopes downward from east to west toward Siems Court. Overview The applicant is proposing to subdivide his lot and remove a triangular piece of property of about 5,600 square feet (.1286 acres). The applicant would then have the property consolidated with . N:\Planning Cases\2005\05-18 Mitchell Minor Subdlvision (pENDING)\08-03-05 PC Report Mitchell Minor Subdivision PC-05-18.doc Page 1 of3 the property to the north (3576 Ridgewood Ct). The applicant is in the process of selling his home; by subdividing and consolidating the subject piece of property, existing sightlines would . be preserved for the neighboring property owner. The applicant's property which was larger than the district requirements to begin, with will be left with a property which would still meet all of the requirements. The consolidation of this new piece with the property to the north actually improves the situation for that property as it appears that the house and deck there were nonconforming with City setback regulations. Since this is not creating a new lot no park dedication would be assessed. Plan Review 1. Zoning - Meets Requirements Single Family Detached Residential is a permitted use in the R-l: Single Family Residential Zoning District Building Setbacks Following is a comparison of the proposed setbacks as compared with the setback standards established by the Zoning Ordinance. Minimum Setback Standards 3568 Ridgewood Ct 93' 68' 36' . 3576 Ridgewood Ct 105' 7.55' 38' 2. Division/Consolidation - Meets Requirement Chapter 11 ofthe City Code lists the requirements for subdividing and consolidating property. Section 1150.04 discusses the procedures for "Division or Consolidation of Platted Lots of Record". Since the subject property is platted, and is being proposed for subdivision and consolidation, this is the section that would explain how the City should proceed on this matter. Requirements listed under Section 1150.04 include: a survey showing the existing and proposed lots, lots which meet City requirements for the zoning district, a determination regarding public welfare, conformity with other aspects of the Subdivision chapter as determined necessary, and payment of filing fees. Staff has reviewed these criteria and determined that: the surveys submitted by the applicant meet City standard, the resulting lots after division and consolidation would meet the requirements for lots in the R-I District, the proposed division/consolidation will not be N:\Planning Cases\2005\05-18 Mitchell Minor Subdivision (PENDING)\08-03-05 PC Report Mitchell Minor Subdivision PC-05-18.doc . Pagelof3 detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to adjacent traets in the approximate area, and filing . fees have been paid. Staff Recommendation In Planning Case #05-18 staff recommends approval of the Minor SubdivisionlLot Consolidation William Mitchell, after making a finding that the proposed subdivision meets City standards and will not have an adverse impact on the surronnding properties or on the community as a whole; subject to the following condition: A. Recording with Ramsey County. The applicant shall file the minor subdivision and lot consolidation with the Ramsey County recorder and shall provide the City with a recorded copy. Options 1. Recommend approval as submitted. 2. Recommend approval with conditions. 3. Recommend denial with reasons for denial, If the City denies the petitioners request, ". . .it must state in writing the reasons for the denial at the time it denies the request. " 4. Table for additional information. Deadline for Al!:encv Actions - September 26, 2005 . The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on July 28, 2005 Pursuant to Minnesota State Statue, the City must act on this request by September 26,2005 (60 days), unless the city provides the petitioner with written reasons for and additional 60 day review period. The City may with the petitioners' consent extend the review period beyond the 120 days. Attachments 4a-l Loeation Map, other pertinent maps 4a-2 Plans and statement of request submitted by the applicant . N:\Planning Cases\2005\05-18 Mitchell Minor Subdivision (pENDING)\08-03-05 PC Report Mitchell Minor Subdivision PC-05-18.doc Page 3 of3 ------- . Planning Commission Meeting August 3, 2005 Attachment 4a - 1 . . illlD U <1z . .. & '" <D '" CI) - Q) Q) u. 0 J 0 CO 0 0 0 0 '<t *<t II = ..- Q) 0 ('(I () (j) 0 0 '<t ~.9~<l>",g;~ O_'!!l:g<l>~al:ll e-gc.~.g::-~~ ~ ~B ~~:~~ ~~~E~~~E a"'~~5"'-mo E ~<o" 0"0$ _ B;;;o t5 ~:g~ a5 (I') <II<ll(/)"<i:::"-"'OI o ~=~~~~~~ o ..EE'" "':H:;g ~ -~~~~~~~~ C ~~~~~~~~ t'O .,;~2~!,,'Ei;l~ 2 ~g~~~~-g~ .0 ""'o<=~B"~ Q) ~1?~s ~t~ lL. ~'6 y-g;:"", l?1! C . ","O-a"O~E~ a. ~:il'!~_~R~E co -.. ~.oEi "'1: :2 $~G~!~;[ ~ 0 ell i~,s~1!a.';.o ;:; (I} ~ Qj;;jOc2!:Q E ;2 a. ~ g~~a~~~~ 8N~ ~ ~- ;;~~~~~~~ (/) c _"'- 0>".:::'" ~f~iS r .. (9 "'.91!:]! li:'O'ii lij ~ to f~g~~{~ff . ~.f~ ~ .?;- iil%gi2B~E~ ~$~~{ 5 "'5':"-~~~,g~ ::E o ~ ~8!~ <I)~~c. >-::;:I:",_~ o :Hi2go~.2!~~ =...,lij"'" 0 {)v"'~1 >. ;~'"":*~~ii;~ N _ -~- ~ f~t~~~-g~~ :B 0 . . E e~lJuog~io g co >>al ~~c~l?'<: '" 0:: =- - 4)10 o"t:l OJ ~ -I ~8~-gE~~:ge ~ __.0.... e",,,,,,:!! .. "$aiiil"EE~.r GJ t~ J:;ms.'!-:l;: CJ -;=.., ~ '- E ..,5';:;'" a.. .jg~EiT,j~o~~ :s .:;E.9.'! ~~I~o o ",~'Og~C:::Il1--:'~ en ;E~E:~2~E'" t:~~~f*~'!i~ u , -. z , t ~'twli. _ I - "C " ''''" ,,,.". . ! ; "':1' ~ ~;;,.,,~ JT!~'i '" " . I ~;I'i"; ; JIB!'" .l""lia ~ ~ ~ ' " JIB"'1 , .':kili ! "'." ~.." ." , · · """ 1,.,.,,.. .l.',__!!:. <J:J;I.,., ~ ' 'I" ii: ,,;.~j,: ""l';a: '!OI h. :-: !5 '. . '.. .,. ..... , .b,.,. ..... , .. .. ., . .. '.. · , . '''.,., '.. ". O. .... ~'ll!i . ;"."'1'1<' >.'1',.". 'HII'Il: {/)I'l;l::~;rr . ... -'. ...., ,. ,',',. ..... . . .... . I :!, ~', ~1'Hi~, ,~ hl,H! 'li"!f1; ~ Q ili:! ; 'j~ -, j "1".1; , "h'Il', l~ ~t~~ -j. f5 .i!t.!.: - , 1.. ~ { ~"j H!;Ji!~ ~ i if1!t-1E Q' t!'if!ii. "d ~ ~i'~ VI S; ~ ~; :11"1,1'" -183 't -; t~~I" Ii :;;;'.s g!l:,.,.-.; i e:: .. " . . "- . '. .... '.. - . .... 5 ., l ii" I 1"11 j' ',h. I,.: ;; l,!,.:.II, ~ ~ ~~ ~ [I 0, ~, I!;,.., .: . ';'1'''11 ". ' ":;'.., ~ rz:I 0 Ii: 0::1" ! f w i I' ','''h, , j .1-. "'j '. I 'll,l;'i; p.. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0;. '~:;;j:i i' I jl;~!;" ", i ;;"1,1,: ;:;l ~ ~ '&j ~ ii: i ;[ ~ l ~-!':~!;!i is. ~ }::hll1~ lO', J ~ll~"!b';~t i ~ l ~ !; t ~ ~: ;::hl!f~ i 1 ~~~,~ ~~!At t:g" lk~ ditl ~ . - .. - . ,., '. 0_ .._. _< " , ~ ~ ii< Z ,.,. {l 0 ""- i -',. "'E " . ".l'~h. '" I !:n:.". " " w.,~, w '.'.r., 0". .".. ..,.. ... ~ '" ~ ..~, U1 ~ ~ .:t~,J2'...<<'i. . '_'j 1:!~. ~::: nf!j'i."i"Sloo,., 00 .. 0 W ',- ,. - . 0" _ w, 'n, . " , :, " ,;, "I'"H, """'" ",,. """', " o. " .' '. ~,_ "''''f-, o. ".'''.1, ""lJ!"I""j~.!:.. ._ .~ \1 i, II ~;; ; 'f~:H;~j; ~ ~ i='l!;i~j;; g~,u !hit;! 1 I t~ 15J7i "., j. '" ~l JI.,.... · - , .' ..' o. . f. 0-::: ~ ~ .....:- :t' ;;~ 1\. 'J''''i " 1.,,,_,", . I I . '. .. " '" ,,,', ,-, ' . .., ,... ,.1,.. -....~- __o,~ 1,.'flJl/lillll! i';~im'" ... 1R" "'. " . ,,' "".' '.' ""'...'" ~..... - ,',-, /// ' , - .' " '. "- V '" ; ------ , . -;$ . ~'" ~., ~(jfJQ2. ~OOAA3<\OI\' . ,i:;. ~m....~O& ~ "/" . '. .... --...... m.," a .. rl ',c,," _~. , ~ "".. '-." "-'- . "."" ',,"," ""'~.... .. L_, - -, --. .... ;';'''%ii::.fW',,' -~'":",, ~'''''''; !l-ll':,';:\ '" ~ .~ < ", .",- ....--l;...j ~ - .... ~'''' , ." : ,- i" f! ::!i " .... "... o. ,I, " . ,. '" ...", .. ..". "z ~, , ", .'~, "'" ...J Z -.) _ .... \>- ......x- ~"'~5a ~- ...... ~'. "," -.. " , .- , , Z . , z, , O "e , ClZ . - O::::J . <> V) <0 .Ii? ~H - n qQ_ ~ > .~, , p wo. ~ ....... "'co; -- Ii S,... ~ii';; 0- ~;.... d w ;: ~ ~~! 8 _w ~:: "'.l' ::: . U", "!" 0 "".. i "'"' ~O;:;l '~!,i '; ";1' ~ "" - 0 ~... . , ., . N , '.. :J -. .. .' ;0', , i_ f r-. ~-~" ...... 0 I- '" ~J - - I '", '",;, I,' '" '" -;; n, ,. : 0 , _J N...J 2' ,g, z -' t.L.. ~ 0.,. tr~~ ~ O Cl - ~~~ ;i., z::I: '1%[ ~ '<. Z ~ z. hCi -""" i ~ <". , ~~ .. -.' ~ N_ -~ i~: ~ "0 .. "'< ^ E-o ~ _. o. . ,. ': , ,. ~o ,- , , N ,,,. '_I I .. <. . .... ' , - "''', ~ ~ I >>-g" , ...- eO,,,., , , ~ o ,_, ..". . ... _ . ~ Q ~ -14 ~ ~ -'- ...:;;!'" i5 '- lJii~y-!il ~"' <-.. , 'c' r_ ~ ... .... -.....-, ---J 0 '. r_, " .... E-<. ~l Ui ...... i:L. ...... '.! . , .. . ""', "', . --,. '. . ' ""'" '" . ' .;~" j , , . """, . U ",- '.,.., , , . ... '" ;;i /$ D III ~ ~ 0 ~S~~.g~~S~it.; 1? ~ ~ ..,'c,...." '. o n L l 0" , [.:J.~.lili1..;.~. ~ rO\l"""I!WO~I~O\SP:>. . . CO '" "" ." . ~ '000' O"!lI .... .~. .... .LnO ~OOl/Ol/LO ~ ~. " ", Wd l~. <.< .:I: __._ City of Arden Hills Chapter 11 Subdivisions . 1150.04 Division or Consolidation of Platted Lots of Record. In the case of an application to divide one or iIIore lots platted into lots and blocks and designated in a subdivision plat on file and of record in the office of the recorder or registrar of titles for the county, into one or more separately described parcels, or an application for the consolidation of two or more snch platted lots or parts thereof into one or more tracts, the City Council, upon review and after report of the planning commission, may approve the subdivision or consolidation, upon compliance with the following conditions: Subd. 1. Survey. The owner(s) of the platted lot(s) to be so divided or consolidated . shall file with the zoning administrator a surveyor registered land survey of the lot(s) to be divided or consolidated. The surveyor registered land survey shall be prepared and certified by a Licensed Surveyor. Subd. 2. Relation to Zoning Ordinance. The parcels or tracts resulting from the division or consolidation, as depicted in the surveyor registered land survey, shall not have an area, dimensions or setbacks which are less than the minimum requirements specified for the zoning district in which tbe parcels or tracts are located in the zoning ordinance. e 11 - 47 Adopted August 12, 2002 City of Arden Hills Chapter 11 Subdivisions Subd.3. Public Welfare. It is determined that the proposed division or consolidation . will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurions to adjacent tracts in the area in which the snbdivision tract is located. Subd. 4. Conformity. The proposed division or consolidation shall conform to snch other requirements of this chapter, which the planning commission has specifically made such division or consolidation subject to at its first meeting at which the application for the division or consolidation is snbmitted. The City Council may add to or subtract from the requirements specified by the planning commission additional requirements ofthis chapter which it deems necessary for the protection of the health, safety, general welfare and convenience ofthe City and to secure the objectives ofthis . chapter. Prior to the City Council's granting the owner(s) an exemption pursuant to this paragraph, the owner(s) shall comply with all the requirements of this chapter Which the planning commission or City Council have specifically made the division or consolidation subject. Snbd. 5. Such filing fee as has been established in a resolution adopted by the Council shall be paid the zouiug administrator with every application for an exemption nnder this paragraph. . 11 - 48 Adopted August 12, 2002 . "0 X '" ..l ~ :! - '" 6 , 0 u '" !::' u 0 0 0 ~ N - .~ ,~ 'f ~~ 0 ;F. ~ '" 2; . ~ 0 '" N N. Iil, '? '" 0' '" 0 ;o'.~ ~ , . ~ _N" N " . " ., N '" .... <I: :s 0 . ~ N or, <I: ;F. ~ ,0 M N ~ ;:: '" ;F. ~. 6 z ~ 0 M N ~ " .;, oJ 0< " ~ '" ~ M ~ 0 - M N M ~~ ~ '" ;F. <<l a: r.o M .. ~ <8 ~ N ,M , " .8 <; .E N ;F. ~ " "" a: '" u ~ 0 ~ ." N M ~ :r: ell :s "" Eo< '- ~ ~ 0 Z '#. !::' ....l ~ ~ '" '" ." N M - '0 ~ " pq '" !::' ~ - :0<: '" ....," " - - '" OJ J:! l'? - .s '0 0' u :rf ~ . ~ .e u- ~ ~ u ~ c .2 6 .2 0- . '" ~ ." 0 ~v " "00 -0 " .~ "". 1l ~ Eo< c 5 la ~ 0 '" " '!! u ~< g. U U c .y.s G)tj .8 -; ~ ,,3Z M g <; sa "" '" .s2 ~o~ ~ " E .8 '" Eo< 'E "23 C'-l EO:: '" = . . 0 ~ E_~ p. " " ell E :>- :>-- " " - ] ~ 11,)] ",.- 00 " pq '" Q '0 ~ ~~ :2 ~~u '" ..l ::; O! "'-Iiii"' ..;;;0 . ,.; ...; .,; .; * . * * . . Planning Commission Meeting August 3, 2005 Attachment 4a - 2 . . -------- - - --------------- ------------ -- . 3568 Ridgewood Ct Arden Hills, MN 55112 633 -9629 July 27, 2005 City Planning Committee City of Arden Hills 1245 W Hwy 96 Arden Hills 55112 634 -5120 Ladies and Gentlemen: My wife and I are the owners of lots 24 and 25 at 3568 Ridgewood Court in Arden Hills. We would like to split off 1/3 of lot 25 for combination with our neighbor's lot 26. No new lot will be created by this shift of the boundary between lots 25 and 26. The size and location of our house on the residual lots 24 and 25 would remain more than adequate to meet current city requirements. The neighbors house on lot 26 will benefit because their deck is immediately adjacent to the . split off property. Attached is a recent survey showing the present and proposed boundaries, and the proposed legal descriptions. We request approval of the City of Arden Hills for the proposed change. Thank you for expeditious consideration of this request, o/L C ~ William C. Mitchell ~ ~ I Carole H. Mitchell , ----- -. --'.- ----.'" --'------- ----------- '--'---'--' -_._-_._---------~----_._~.. ~o 1 0" " ". u ~ N P i ~i~~~!; ~i ~~~~ !:{ ~~~ ~ ~ ---::"~ - 0 i I! ,,"H,! ji ,i,l ill i;; [JJ ! w ~ '" ~ ~~~>--~~" o~ .-~H f~'" ~~~ C i ~ a 8 ~~ 80'. ~- t;oo~ ~<':- .,~~ ~ z o ~ ~i ,i!nt~~ ~ ~ ~:.~~ ~l! :!~ ~ ~ = ~ ~~- 8 '" ~ ~3:H!~ >-: t~ ~~l~ ~t~ ~lR U ~ ~~ ! 1 lo~]H:; ~ i 1" H~~ ;~~ ~!:: p "'i ~ 8 __ VI .. u!Hfi~ ~ '0 u! ,H~ tU~ q;t 0 ~ 0", is ~ (ll ~ 5 f:- i t~:it!il fr ~ i~ f'1l_ d~ l~~ rn . ~3 or i Z - e: j .~, i~o" '" 3. u~ "~'~ p~ !.", (Zl -<;ll;:; ; ;~. 8 ~ ~ j nhiH !!. H !iH in li~; : ~ !I : ~ Vl.3' lLJ 2i;;. ~3.~Ot ~ ~ ',; !~" '.i>~ 1'0. ~ 0;: <=-jjl ... : ~ f< ;: ~ !;~~H~ ~ ~ H ~H! "~H ~!~ ~ 0:: ~ E~ g z "i ~!'3'!'1 ~ ~ ~~ ,~.j.i ~~~ od ~ w 0 L.... '" " ;:;:: fj:. ~i~~:'l 3 ~ !~ lE~1 i ~~~ ~11 t ~ z ~ \ ~ D .= i! ~~.tlll ~ ~ .:;- P!~ '" c.'_ !.~ - ~ \j- ~ bi :t.j g~~i'IJl; 5! ~~ n~~" ~'3~ ~~~.. ~ ~ \ ,\ ~ iL 0 n ~ ~;hNi ~ i ~; :~rd ";.0: ~h~ ~ :::.:: \ t\':j ; ! ~ i; HHig ; ~ H i~g~ i ~iH ~H! i i \ .~ on 'i "o~.~_.. 8 it ". ..-~~ ::l' '"~1: ~.~.~ ~ '" " ~ 5 ~ ~ ~~ iH~;i~ ~ ~ H ];Hi ~ HH ;Hi; ~~!~ b !,~~ ~~~/---__ il'lrI4~!~~ -~ .I: ~,__ i~~l1 <>--- .",<"",-. '!1:I"" --'----.-J-____ ----....----...., .""~.~~u ~, ..: -1 .' . ,.~ ..1.. ~ _~i:!r~ ~., ~ - / o 11 // ". -.s en H:J ~, ..;:..~ Is! .' -~ rn ~ 1/ <,.... '2 ::: ~~ l!! .:(J~ :<:::;; " p ," 'e~ h .,~~ ;>< I <,'''x .97 a ~"'-- :... ",' ,0'~",_. ~~. ( ''''0' _ Z T ,~,oo - P::;:> ~ \ ~~6~6 (fJ ..: 0 I ~ . ~'&n - U . t; "''''"-''- >....; ~ / .:!l 08 _ ~" 'IE;1 O ~~ 'jk" U ~ ~; ~ ~~ co '" 0 - , ^' I . 11: i3 ~ O....J<f2 '3:>" :::'<: <0 ~ IJ:I p:: '} ~"'''' ~ I1l (,..., _~" 8~ il: V.J. ~!.o ('..j lQ u5 &01< I I " ~'Z .... 0:: "'-,g fiE I ",.;; I- a ~ -'- ~ "F , ~ 0 _ '" e "~~ Z tt: 3 ~ ~2:1 I __/ Z....J Z ":z n ---1.. _ ~~u '" '""<" "" N Cl "'C/o ~~ ~ p;: '''''~'' rn <r:: . i~~ ~ ~5~ ~ O~ ~ ....::I 0 .; ~r ~~ t; e ~ !--r-z ~ ~ # It*"" ~ : - ~ i N ~ i!\ U u' , / 1-. , o .. ,I...J 0 ~ ! >- ~5~ m ...-I t r....' " / > " .... ------ -.00",,_ ~.~",,<w,,.,, ~.~~~~ >- '~----r-,tO.;l; ---.. -.,o-,<_~~ I '-'O'~"""')..l"", ~~~~.~~ ~ .LO.'I.50 N - -_ _ ~, ~f~~~i ~ '-""oosm.,;..,_. -,f'9t ~t~~~~~ ...., ,y, ." """" L 3 .h,QL.60 ?::-,':t~,,!!, ~ r r\ '1""S'1 to -__ ~ .,.<' V.J. -------- ~G.I!: ---- ~~~ <O"~~-l ~ o ", ., t::t:l 1 :i ~ ~ ~ '0 << < i " 0 U o u -" ........ :;l?S ;x 8 ~ " ~ :>c:g !---4 ~~; 0 "0 ~ ~ ,<"-,,, "" ~'" w i1"~" ! B<:tOof>ofJ'-"l;'!IID: ~~~~\~~ r....'~ -'<:~~~ ~~~ ...\;W ~_. - ...... Ul --~~-- d v n no ,00ZlOZl LO "WSO,I ,0\!,q'I!W 0" 'O\S):)>. OIdI' N ___. .nw__.__._"_'_,,__w_ . 'If}/ I . EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS ~i.[';t ! "'k"," ''O,m, 00" ',0""00 ,~" "m ".oo.>O.noo'" ....~ .: ..' .1i1.... / Lots 24 and 25, Block 1, Arden Hills, Ramsey County, Minnesota ..:....l -.::0'--'::-1-- I ..llJ .~. "":..'9, I Tice / Wheel.... Property 3576 Ridgewood Court .'::.1',110::. ! Lots 26, Block 1. Mden H"s. Romse, Count,. .'nnesoto (PIN 34.30.23.22.0028) .. L"tt':::> ; . .f'e ; ",...!f 0 ! ,~'~; -J 0 ;; PROPOSED FINAL DESCRIPTIONS , ! ",~,~:-"ic' ~I h:~' a ~; PROPOSED FINAL DESCRIPTION FOR MITCHELL PROPERTY ...:.a 0 iiil Lots 24 and 25. Block f. A,den H'",. Rom,ey Co,n',. .'nne,oto, e'cept that portion of Lot 25. Block f. descdbed 1 ':". ~- ::Ji (]5 follows: .." 0./ .: ~'. J, ~:::'ii.' 0 gl Commencing at the North....est comer of Section 34, Township 30 North, Range 23 West, (] Ramsey County Sur...ey &t~s ,I .oo_~, -- , ". .. .. .. ~." .- - .. ._-,~" -~ ,_. -~ ,., . .;.~., -; Adj..tment, 0 distance of 695,fB feet, mace 0' less, to the Northeast comer of Lot 25. Block f. Mden H",s, 0 ~;{: ;.~. ~ l found * inch iron pipe; thence S 10. 20' 34"' W (] distance of 5,00 feet (lloog the east line of said Lot 25 and K /.". 'L.L.1 ~ :/ the westerly righ! of way af Ridgewood Court. to Q set survey monument marked "Kemper 18407"; thence N 89 ,-'..::.:::...,.-- 40'43" W a distance of 206.06 f~et to 0 set survey monument marked ""Kemper 18407"; thence N 091"01" E a -2t.-._: '- 0 -.'<' distance of SO.OO feet along the east right of way of Siems Court and along the west line of said Lot 25, Block :: ~....>) -.:_ 1, to 0 found ~" iron pipe. for the Northwest corner of said Lot 25; thence S 77. OS' 36" E a distance of 204.13 ~.::.;:-, .~_... feet to th~ point of beginning. na' .,-? .fil > - ~.<::: 0::::: PROPOSED FINAL DESCRIPTION FOR TlCE / WHEELER PROPERTY ;;):...~.::.,::. . _._ ~- Lot 26. Block 1. Arden Hills, Ramsey Coonty, Minnesota, and that portion of lot 2S, Block 1. described os follows~ It:-.~.,':f.~> _ _ . I Commencing at the Northwe~t c~8f' of Section 34. Township 30 North, Range 23 West. a Ramsey County Sur\lt!ly -, ... - 'I Monument; thence S 60. 09 00 E, bearing based on the Rams~y County Coordinate System, December 1991 -~. ~_ AdjJstment, a distance of 69S.18 feet, more or less, to the Northeast comer of Lot 25, Block 1, Arden Hills. a . '! ,_" _ ,_ W' ._. ". ~ ~. . . ~"_ .,"00 ~, "_ .. .."" .' o;Ho' ,.., _ _ - - the ~sterly right of way of Ridgewood Court, to a set survey monument marked "Kemper 18407"; thence N 89' _ _, _ 40' 44" W a distance of 206,06 feet to a set survey monument marked "Kemper 18407"; thence N 0911'01" E a -I.. distance of 50.00 feet 0lon9 the east d9ht of way of Siems Co,rt and olong the west line of soid Lot 25, Block 1. to a found )4" iron pipe, for the Northwest comer of said lot 2S; thence S 77'05'36" E 0 distance of 204.13 - - - feet to the point of beginning. DESCRIPTION OF PARCEL TO BE TRANSFERRED FROM MITCHELL TO TlCE / WHEELER Thot port of Lot 25. Block 1, Arden Hills, Ramsey County. Minnesota described os follows: Commencing at the Northwest comer of Section 34. Township 30 North, Range 23 West, 0 Ramsey County Survey Monument; thence S 60. 09' 00" E. bearing based on the Ramsey County Coordinote System. December 1991 AdjJstment. a distance of 695,18 feet, more or less, to the Northeast comer of Lat 25. Block 1, Arden Hills, a found 11.; inch iron pipe; thence S 10' 20' 34" W a distance of 5.00 feet olong the east line of said Lot 25 and the westerly right of way of Ridgewood Court, to a set survey monument morlc:ed "Kemper 18407"; thenee N 89" 40' 44" W 0 distance of 206.06 feet to a set survey monument marked .Kemper 18407~; thence N 0911'01" E """'.;.',,1 distance of 50.00 feet 01009 the east right of way of Siems Court and along the west line of said Lot 25, Block D K 1/IIIii 1, to Q found )4" iron pipe, for the Northwest comer of said Lot 25; thence S 7IOS'36" E a distance of 204,13 ~ . 1:41. //....... feet to the point of beginning. .,.... 10 'l " ........~....%:.. Said parcel contains 5,600 square feet, or 0,1286 acres. icTSSrr;;.IAL.'. S , -:.,:,:;,' 0 CplTIF1!lATION '0J-,iCY R: = I !<EREtf< CERTIFY !HAT !H15 " SURVE~ PlAN OR REPORT KEMPER & ASSOCIATES INC. laW? ;;m;~EPARED BY UE OR UNOER J'Y .... <p" SUPERVISION AND THAT i ............ ~ ~A DULY UCENSED I LAND SURVEYING. ENGINEERING , MI~~ SSlONAL LA SURVEYOR' \\\\ NDER THE LAWS THE " '1IIllll\\\\\\ STATE WINNES TA._____.- 721 OLD IDGHWAY No. 8 N1f ~ NEW BRIGHTON, MINNESOTA 55112 651-631-0351 2005 FAX 651-631-8805 KEWPER oS!: ASSOCIATES, INC. @ . . . ~ '37-52 PM " ,~~, M o omon00503 m ['''I [':";1 . ~ ~, "' . 0' ! \;\"\\.' -.', :-. ~" 0 N ~O"~~" ''-,.'.., 0""3:-o~ "" . -.. "O>""L, CJ g 2!ii~~<fl8~1"'\~>:c ;J: '" Z ::;;;0::0 (1 :c: 2J OJ::lJ :;0-< "'; 9 ~ ~8ffi ~ ~ n $ ~ ~ -< ~ -: :::l '.Jl 9::<:"J<:!:3 ~ 1; ""~':';;:3 ~ - · 8 ::t"'"" 0.... ~ . " " , . ".., . - trj 0 C n :!:''''c;o J:: , . . . ',-. . . , ' - , '-0 , , ':::t1 <to c: z!f-<.... ;;< . , , .",~ " .. . . -. p. c .., c ..., , , , , - , . "'lj - 10 _ '. I.. ..J. ";J;> !>-3 trj ~. Q, O ____ '''"'''.'''~..,''''~__ \ ---~~,- -'.---N 09'8',.. E , "'j ,.. ./ "., - -. -. """. , '''' ,C " ',' "'i,,! ,..... _ ". "" " "0.' I "1 , Ul ;0";1 '''''' ". . . . " j' m"i ,... ",'" I r, '-< '3.~.~ ' - I!" . "'" r I 0 0 II .,.... ~ 1 ~..cc" 0 / () --" ~ . "", ^ ~ - . ~~;;~ ~ / ~ trj . " ~> ~ 0 ":' "', / ! v""" oS "' "'" " ..,~ · ,- '----t-O ,.~ ., '" · ""0 ::0 ~ ~ '~- ", 0', ~ ". 0" 0 '~. e , 'i I,; ." ,. '" N ~ . " !, ",.. - ' , "" ,. '" 2 Z '" '" . l~ 0 il'< > ''- . "i " 2 0 1~~ ~~ii .... t;j ~~g iIIO;:l t"'" ~ r Z nl' M~ t'"' N r- oo ~ "0" t:Jl 'N 0 'i" 11 '_", ~ ," -; "'" N, u. !" · ", , '. -- c: .., , '. , ,. - ".' . ". , ,. II' '" : ,!: I , "'h: b i;i IJ:l ' yo , !,' ; " "I, ~" 0 <> . _'it .. .. g ........ ~ --vol; ~ '" L.....J"... - . ~~ -' ~'-<- "~ , ..... < .g~ . "~. "",," 'i' u _ !8~ 0> (fJ -0 <::::0 _ . . 2", 0 - I "", ! ' ~2 Z ' , o i ,,'- ~ ,,~ '''I' ,",,." ,", ~ ~ 11;-. "" ~ .-" ~ ~ ,.. .. , ~y " 2 U -"" ~" .' '" 77"'~i , " ~ "'''';:: ,- -. ." " ~ ".. , 0, -- . · .. 0 ! 1<.11(") - .." ____ ",}:J .' _":.' ~ ...., " """--.. ~ "'- , '" . -- .... '-,., ,. ij"' \ ~ \i)!iJiSk~1ir!i:)~\4~~:'<<i . '_ '-~'-"1 ,. ~ ~~".<..."<_:;-:"",:-:-<:,::p.:,;::,:,,,.,~~.., ....':.."'.....}...~R.... ..D..,.~.'~-'lt3~..,:,:~~.:~<~~.u.r~~_~'..:,:.,;.'.>,;ro_,...... '. '", .. .... N'tlJ.,~.r!~'6~. .......~;/? ":n .., '''<2~:'<~, I G'r:-~W _ .'.... ""'_"... "." '. . . ~ ., ~ "'0:.,:....... ':"';;'1".'."'.,. c. 0 CO'U.'R -.=T......:~'-..;:~.,i;".,:,O:"'.'.,".!.... _. 2 '" '^ ~ii,....,.. """""''''cf.,~, "" ~" ---,. -"""" ''''.>1 '. . ''''I' ! '"'''' '"'' """" ____'__~~,,~. ,j",""" ;:l .::!>-QJ.""~ 9 , , I 1 ~ · .~. i '" "[~if<>l :~ ;go ," ~ ~ ~~ ! " . "'., . .., , i .i> -.....<;~~"l i ?Z :Qf~l!l.~! !OJ' ;j " '. ~~ ' ~- ''''"0 ""'" v, ., ~ q~'. ! . Ct.!!;:!? I. ~~ ;:I'.!)L. ~ li,;:J~:::,t! 8 _ [~~ l ~ ~~ ....... 6 <>l'I~!!.a311'1l :u _~ ~~;rt'l!" . ~._. , ."" ."", '" h:1 1 ~c. "', ~Hla;:. ~~ ~P"-:~>!:i _ '" ~"\8!!~~.~~~ 1;':::0 ~ if! :j "'>i ' -. · n,,,,,,,,,,, "".". ...10, ". .., , ..' . " - .. ,. . '" h.". '. " , '"'''' . ". , " \u5 J ';hFi!ll~ ~~ ;!!:~i'i~: ~ HJ;~f:&i i ~ g J! i ~ M pO \!. ;ga~'JI~~~ ! s~ i~hs.l~5l.!" ~ i(~i;:!~~&","j 0 ~ '< "!! G1 't" - ,. "~ ! -, I., -' <." _ ; ~ . 0 J> ~ ::l~l~~i ~ rig '!''ftif''';,;,~~;, ~ 'IPqC~ ~ ~ ,3! 5 ~ : ~ ' . ,- '11"0 ," c "r "- ~ f &. I' I I Z _'. g ~ _l~ "'1 !'i'i ~i. q~,; ~ ~ 1:f~l'~, ~ f:. I. I ~ ~ ~ s: a:: i Hi :~l~ : b }li:f~!j~ j ~ ,";~;i'! ~ 0 .[ ~ h' ~ z'tl . -"!'I.I'~ .". ":'Oi< i'" ~.;!"'.;.!: 'i 2 I"T1 0. ,,:l a;1 o t!j ~ isJ.::\H ! !il~ ^jl'j::fj,,;c f;: ~~ ~~s~; I 2 ~ " ~ !:;} ~ " .' 1 - w "'." ',_ 0 '_ =~ gJ ::0 : H!;!!.: I ~ 'WJf~'1 i ! oliH;I~ ~ 2 ~ ~ i ~ Sl .- '" , '~l'rll. 8 o.! -~l'," [1'1"'1'. ~ oj ~ '" S.il@;;1I:' oj j.~ll f ;1-!~;:;8}!~1 9. ~ tI~~!~,I!~! ~ Sl , ~ .,. " -, "' "-." ~ ~. I ip '" ,". U1 2 " .,' '''! · ,. I'l"", . " 3;" ! ! IJ'''.il I '; 'ei : ' ~I~: ~ U1 ~~d!ik Ilf'Uli'j , ~ ",h'il'! ~..'j !I~ , ~. ' "".' h' 'n -"'1'0' -, a-'" ~ .1" "! ~ " " , 1 1..2. '" v, '-1. 'l< " ,., w~ < ""al'".' , ._" . . - . ., ". " '.. .. .. '. . . , " "0 .,,',.,. ",1I.., ! .", "', " 'I " I . ~. g ('l al!!,.", "'.0., """"', , , 2 ~ - '". -f " "'",h ',,~ ,ol '~ ., " I ~. '" > '1""'1" "",.,l! .....h!. , " ~ S;J..., :'!!;~!l tl':,:i;!<, """.1 . , - - ".".". 1 ,,,". , ....,.,.. ! . I z ,., "., 0 ,,<< , , '"'. '" I '" t:Jl !'1l,l3 ;~~~~nil _ ";,,., , . 'I ;~~.;i,. g:~,. 1 . c - :.:R'...~Ii~ ~ Z c_ . , 0 61