My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-09-26-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2020-2029
>
2026
>
03-09-26-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/14/2026 2:04:41 PM
Creation date
4/14/2026 2:04:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approved: April 13, 2026 <br />CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA <br />CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION <br />MARCH 9, 2026 <br />5:30 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS <br />CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Grant called to order the City Council Work <br />Session at 5:30 p.m. <br />Present: Mayor David Grant; Councilmembers Brenda Holden, Tena Monson, Emily <br />Rousseau and Kurt Weber <br />Absent: None <br />Also present: City Administrator Jessica Jagoe, Public Works Director/City Engineer <br />David Swearingen, Assistant Public Works Director Lucas Miller, Parks and Recreation <br />Manager Jess Skalicky, Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk Julie Hanson and <br />Community Development Director Jake Reilly <br />1. PUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL <br />Greg Larson — 3377 North Snelling Avenue, Arden Hills — He wanted to speak about the franchise <br />fee. He spoke out against the franchise fee at the time the city adopted the franchise fee on <br />the City's electric and gas bills. His fear was that the franchise fee revenues would be used <br />for purposes other than the construction of the City's new fire station for Lake Johanna Fire <br />Department (LJFD). That's exactly what happened in December of 2025. Council approved <br />a levy that shows up as 12.5%. He asked the City Administrator what that would have been <br />if the $165,000 in excess revenue from the franchise fee were added to that. It was in there, <br />but it's hidden. Residents saw an adopted levy that was 12.5%. The City Administrator told <br />him that with that additional $165,000 the effective levy was 15.2%. Residents don't know <br />that. He asked the city what the intent is for the use of excess franchise fees in the future. <br />The City Administrator said it is the general indication that the city would use any excess <br />fees towards the department's future expenditures. The final statement on the bond issue <br />states, "for the purpose of financing the City's proportionate share of the cost of constructing <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.