Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-11-26-RMayor: David Grant Councilmembers: Brenda Holden Emily Rousseau Tena Monson Kurt Weber City Council Agenda May 11, 2026 7:00 p.m. City Hall Address: 1245 W Highway 96 Arden Hills MN 55112 Phone: 651-792-7800 Website: www.cityofardenhills.org City Vision Arden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long-standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play. Members of the public may attend a meeting in -person at City Hall or they may view the meeting remotely on the City's website using the below link. Meetings are also broadcast on Cable Channel 16 for those that live in Arden Hills. https://cityofardenhills.org/320/`­Watch- City-Meetings Some Councilmembers may be participating in this meeting by interactive technology/remotely. This meeting will be streamed live on local Cable Channel 16 and available for playback on our website. CALL TO ORDER 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 2. TCAAP/Rice Creek Commons Update Jessica Jagoe, City Administrator 3. PUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL This is an opportunity for citizens to respectfully bring to the Council's attention any items which are relevant to the City. In addressing the Council, you must first state your name and address for the record. Comments shall be limited to three (3) minutes or less. Written documents or other materials should be handed to the City Clerk for distribution to the Council prior to or during the meeting. Council will generally not respond at the same meeting where an issue is initially raised by a member of the public but the Council may refer the issue to staff for further research and possible report or action at a future Council meeting. 4. RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIES 5. PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS 5.A. Northeast Youth And Family Services (NFYS) Angela Lewis-Dmello, President & CEO Documents: MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF 5.13. Proclamation Recognizing May 17-23, 2026 As National Public Works Week Mayor Grant Documents: MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF 5.C. Proclamation Recognizing May 11-16, 2026 As Police Week Mayor Grant Documents: MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF 6. STAFF COMMENTS 6.A. Transportation Update David Swearingen, Public Works Director/City Engineer Documents: MEMO.PDF 7. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 7.A. April 13, 2026 City Council Work Session Documents: 04-13-26-WS.PDF 7.13. April 13, 2026 Regular City Council Documents: 04-13-26-R.PDF 7.C. April 27, 2026 City Council Work Session Documents: 04-27-26-WS.PDF 7.D. April 27, 2026 Regular City Council Documents: 04-27-26-R.PDF 8. CONSENT CALENDAR Those items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion under a Consent Calendar format. There will be no separate discussion of these items, unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda. 8.A. Motion To Approve Claims And Payroll Pang Silseth, Accounting Analyst Joua Yang, Finance Director Documents: MEMO.PDF 8.13. Motion To Approve First Quarter Financials Joua Yang, Finance Director Documents: MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF 8.C. Motion To Authorize City Staff To Begin Summer Work Hours Beginning Tuesday, May 26, 2026, And Concluding On Friday, September 4, 2026 Julie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk Documents: MEMO.PDF 8.D. Motion To Approve System Interconnection Agreement For Fire Protection Services Between Arden Hills And Mounds View David Swearingen, Public Works Director/City Engineer Documents: MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF 8.E. Motion To Approve Settlement Memorandum For Parcel 10 — Old Highway 10 Trail Improvements Project David Swearingen, Public Works Director/City Engineer Documents: MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF 8.F. Motion To Approve Resolution 2026-026 Exercising The City's Authority To Opt -In And Support The Ramsey County Economic Development Agenda ("EDA") Jake Reilly, Community Development Director Documents: MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF 9. PULLED CONSENT ITEMS Those items that are pulled from the Consent Calendar will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda. 10. PUBLIC HEARINGS 11. NEW BUSINESS 12. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 13. COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS ADJOURN PUBLIC PRESENTATION - 5A MEMORANDUM DATE: May 11, 2026 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Jessica Jagoe, City Administrator SUBJECT: Northeast Youth and Family Services Update Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A Northeast Youth and Family Services President and CEO Angela Lewis-Dmello will provide a presentation update (see Attachment A) at the May 11 Council meeting. Attachment A. Northeast Youth and Family Services Presentation B. Annual Report C. Brochure D. Model of Care Page 1 of 1 0 u N a) LIM 40M Z N LL z N LL z LL _0 z C O .w O N ,N O D > 1 •U n _0 U N N •� E E I N _0 O C: N I _0 � E m � i L � U O � U � l0 C1A 0- N ro O =3 a--+ V) �O � t71 N U O O t1A O ro ca Ln +, vrov 4-1 • ern o O N N c6 � a••' I � '> U can � � U LL L U O z � z= o s V) O -0 N v - O O N cn > � V � � � � •i U �, •�' 4 O O ca O v > N a� Z3 i O U- a� O .0 p .� v •0 O ca � ro O cn LL > p O '— U • U = 0 • W U Q) cn V 1 � _ L � ^ C) ate-+ L- .0 4--) 0 bLO W/ 0 � m FEW E 0 Ln aU Ln co v O N N i O Q U dJ cn E C6 N LL z Lu O .> > � O Q Ul) O 4- o°c v UO � O i a o _ = m CL = O ._ Q m W, O '� CID°' > s _ E v) •ago U N O o E m Ov 0 0 +, 76 � O _ z N LL z U cn r) O O U N N Q) y V) O L z 0 a (_ ) $ \{_±Raaf §20P-a)0 g ±om�0-. ummoI-- e2mEGt§\\\ }\f//0 0 g]E¢3U)?u = 55!%R£$a¥§ 3: L N S Q E O L 0 4 C6 .E C6 11 LL _ 1 r V 4-1� _� to O N U 4-j _1 O � cn D ON v m m U Ln Q U U cn O O O � U O S Ln N cUi� cn ClA N � U �+ a--+ E Ln ^I W N +-7 O U E 'L Ln N _ O O U E N w m N LL z N N L ro Q L i a-J i N L C6 E Q) N 0 O U v a.., U � N � O O b.A a--+ L ate-+ a--+ 4-J � N 4-1 / N Q .0 N U •L C6 'L ^� (J 1 C O N > O M L L � w O N E 0 O > O O U �--+ C O N N Q 4--J Q:� Q CO 0 O0 U O U O U 4-J E E U U m U 0 Q 4-j E E U J co Ln U N � U co r a"' U V U LL 40M Z CQ) O a--+ U N v i -0 � � +-' N ,C Q N W .N _ .� CO U U .N L � � U L N +� U � L 0 N O aJ L L O tLo J � O �N Cl O N U U N � O O (1); U (N Z,— � N O N N 0 N W U � L .N O C =3 N N = N — �_ '> C O N d E > �J �--+ (3) � L +-+ � U �r C6 zU N O o .._0 > O -0 + C: s +- c6 v U U C6 E Q 4A _0 N +-j f� ra — Ln 4-j v N cn a--+ U Ou O ca N O Q i _ •O •� N 4 •> J +� — c6 0 t U LL O � N � m a--+ bn E N , > N > O — -- ro Q L ' — � bn N U > > 'N O U ro O a c U Q -+ O a- J r — LA E r O E O c/) _O U Q.0 � � -0 C6 i N � O N •O .N N �O a--' E f � as--+ O C6 > . U aA O U CE a-- N O }' Q N +-+ foro f� U U N L O }, O C U _0 L 4—j � U v � +- L �. � N O O Q ry-- U O �� cn U V CLwM Q U N N n N c6 N a- J �J N N Q ' E c6 c6 ro X a_+ cN hA U O QJ U O v O c6 •V U N N Q (3) N N O U -0 O O LL 4-1 C] LL z O U U a O 4-j � � Q U Q aA h� C6 U o � O .— U � ro z (1) .. cn co � U o '> •— > J V cn � O Q z 0- CL U C6 U 0 C6 0 a� 0 2 a--+ aA J L iz ro U N 4- c� M 0 U cn a--+ N U V) O 2 N LL z 4--J nm W m U O O (1) U � v U Uro 0- m _0 p w C6 Q U > -0 a- J U buO ro ro ca 4-J — •� U W 4 N z D F� N LL z TY LL z v z CL LU 0 U O LL s E 0 � o � d E � = s Q-a O N l a m a 04 p 0 =3 m a s O pl O � U C Cn m � 2 N CO O O C CY) m -9 V O C � co O O -Oo 3 m s °- rn r o � o s `m c o � W v O N (� — h„ O c/) C: U i .0 a--+ c6 f� E O . > U L N C6 N C6 ate-+ cn N O O O +N-+ O N o can �Q � O v +- (U O a) a� N ro O � ° 0 0 Ln O_ ro � O Z5 � Q +� � O c- In V (UO E 0° n 0 v • • • N a N U O co 0 co rn 10 co I H LL z V) cn N MO O ca � U cn 4— Co O -0 N � 0 +, �> V) (1) O b.p O O a- J J V) m v / L / N O N -(3 v 4j >>= i v v i v 'z z v 4-1 O 0j O N • alp a 3 U E U E O O > V � Q -0'1* N M M� m Q U co •E L. aj U � i i` N s � •O = = E O v M d i GJ N 4a > � O V V (A . . V) V) u LLM 4—j � � z L 0 E LL U k $Ln 6$ w� -M &2K d 22 O t CL E J 66 2 t § � i k K} 2 a 2 @ � rcl Ao in � I � ■ � k§ LU a � P4 L @ \\� � / � � ■ � � o � f /tk� � 4--) m V 1 u 1 CAI O N LL Q� ro U (n N tZA O L Q L U fa t ca mmJ W E W N O N M L • u 0 LL. w a E u Ev Lu V u y a <_ J �a k� z z CW L I d u E� 0 En E W Z 0 w LU Z En D LL oz I D H L/ H z L N O N 0 N m 7 Z C H LL, 40M z Qj LL N co O N LL V) aJ = m 4-, QJ ca fo U N C CD (7 an C6 a teJ C:L U u Q =3 O i co _0 0 0 �v )I rW^ v I W C X L1J Ln N O N a V) a� a + cv _ (n E E U fB c N N ru _ V qA cn C�6 Li [V C E O U N LL z lqT N E O Ln N E V) LL z N LPL Ln O M N UL 0) O r-I O M N LL ON � Ln a r*4 LL 'U M •- O C)A .O_ � N •> N M m E O a •� a) N O M LL a-j hA c6 -a � N ca LL 0-0 N 2�- E O O 4A i-n N O U 0-0 E L CU a-j aA O Vol ra buo O 0 a-j V) N O D 0 a� Ln N LL z N LL z n0 \W N O U N m O 4- j N i O U_ J 00 Wr-, Q O m m 1.0 Q0 O M Qo Ln i O N LL z • Clarityin Motion. Guided by our values. Northeast Youth Strengthened by our community. & Family Services Transforming Lives 2024-2025 'AA to the Community w Letter from our President and CEO Transforming lives by ensuring access to care that nurtures healing, cultivates community, and inspires hope. Dear Friends and Partners, Every organization has defining years — moments when it takes bold, meaningful steps that propel its mission forward. For NYFS, 2025 was such a year. We have always been a scrappy organization, filled with determination, hope, and an indomitable will to serve our community. Because of that resilience, this year carried us to a new place of organizational stability and intentional growth that has allowed us to deepen our mission in exciting and innovative ways. Thanks to our longstanding partnership with Mounds View Schools, we were able to sell our building to the district, achieving a degree of financial health and stability we haven't seen for many years. We also started the Kay Andrews Legacy Endowment at the Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation to honor one of our founding staff and longtime President and CEO, Kay Andrews. With this strong financial position, we can focus on our core mission — transforming lives — building on Kay's incredible vision and stewardship. As a result, this year has brought remarkable growth to our programs and services, in both breadth and depth. We re -imagined Youth Pathways, our youth diversion initiative, strengthening the integration of restorative practice principles. Our Restoring Power domestic and sexual violence program now offers criminal legal advocacy through a vital partnership with White Bear Lake Police Department. We launched Early Childhood Mental Health services to support children from birth through five years old with targeted child -parent interventions. An on -site food pantry was created with our partners to help our clients meet basic needs. This growth allowed us to expand our group therapy services, deepen our investment in the emerging workforce, and re-establish a research partnership with the University of Minnesota. We are well positioned for long-term impact. Our values -driven program development is rooted in three key factors: the voices of clients and community members expressing urgent needs; trusted partners encouraging us to serve in new and creative ways; and generous donors like you, whose support turns ideas into action. Together, these relationships weave us into the vital fabric of our ecosystem. As NYFS moves into our 50th year, we are gaining greater clarity in our mission and purpose — and we are ready to celebrate 50 years of impact with the community that has made it possible! Thank you for your continued support, )fte A - Angela Lewis-Dmello NYFS President & CEO CLARITY IN MOTION 1 2024-2025 REPORT TO THE COMMUNITY Highlights & Outcomes FY July 1, 2024 - June 30, 2025 Clinic- — Based %01 -F 1712P1 Clients ed 41% increase over last year school- 264 Based 232Youth Pathways 5 119,440 Total Sessions 39 Community Advocacy ;toring ver Generalized Post Traumatic Major Depressive Anxiety Disorder Stress Disorder Disorder MUNICIPALITIES Arden Hills Birchwood Village Falcon Heights Hugo Little Canada Lauderdale Mahtomedi Mounds View New Brighton North Oaks Roseville Saint Anthony Village Shoreview Vadnais Heights White Bear Lake White Bear Township SCHOOL DISTRICTS Centennial Schools Mounds View Public Schools St. Anthony - New Brighton Schools PUBLIC SAFETY Mounds View New Brighton Ramsey County Attorney's Office Roseville Saint Anthony Village White Bear Lake Together we accomplish so much more than we could ever do on our own! NYFS.ORG 3 Guided by our values. IV Strengthened by our community. 300+ community members & partners at Vadnais Heights Commons. Bob Jacobson, MN Department Attendees learned about NYFS of Public Safety Commissioner Programs like Play Therapy. �r Leadership Luncheon Success A gathering of community, connection, & hope. In the spring, more than 300 community members gathered for our annual Leadership Luncheon. The energy was warm and hopeful as New Brighton Mayor Kari Niedfeldt-Thomas opened the program, followed by thoughtful remarks from President and CEO Angie Lewis-Dmello and MN Department of Public Safety Commissioner Bob Jacobson. This year's luncheon held special meaning as we celebrated the first anniversary of our Restoring Power Program. In just twelve months, this program provided support to more than 350 individuals experiencing emotional, physical, psychological, technological, and sexual violence. The room fell quiet as Restoring Power victim -survivors shared what healing looked like for them, and how far they had come. The luncheon was powerful not only in spirit, but in impact. Together, we raised more than $67,000 for essential mental health and community services. We are deeply grateful to everyone who joined us, shared in this moment, and fueled our mission. We look forward to welcoming you again on May 6 for another meaningful gathering. Save the date for the 2026 Leadership Luncheon on Wednesday, May 6 at the vadnais Heights Commons. Expanding Advocacy in White Bear Lake For the first time, NYFS is serving as the primary advocacy contact for all domestic violence charges and related incidents in White Bear Lake and Gem Lake. The center of this partnership is prevention and early intervention. When officers respond to a domestic violence call, even if no arrest is made, they now send a referral to NYFS. This early connection creates options. It offers safety planning, resources, and validation during an overwhelming and often vulnerable time. Most importantly, it increases the chance that harm can be interrupted rather than escalated. This approach is already making a difference. We successfully reached 73% of all referrals submitted — 64% of those individuals chose to continue receiving ongoing advocacy services. These numbers are higher than industry average and represent real people in moments of crisis who now have a path toward stability and healing Special thanks to the White Bear Lake Police Department for their partnership, vision, and dedication to safety and community. This partnership reflects the community we strive to build. It strengthens safety, removes barriers to care, and ensures that those experiencing domestic violence are met with connections instead of silence. 4 CLARITY IN MOTION 1 2024-2025 REPORT TO THE COMMUNITY "... leadership & heart." V* Introducing our Transformational Model of Care Our Transformational Model of Care reflects what NYFS is most proud of in how we provide client care. It is holistic, relational, and rooted in equity, shaped by the diverse services we offer and the strengths every client brings with them. This approach is the "NYFS way": trauma -informed, culturally responsive, and grounded in dignity, connection, and practices that genuinely support healing and growth. Our model serves as a shared framework that ensures the care we provide remains thoughtful, mission - driven, and focused on fostering lasting change. Remembering Kay Andrews Kay Zimmerman Andrews was a founding pillar of NYFS. What started with a small team of four and a bold vision grew into an organization shaped in many ways by her leadership and heart. Kay's life was defined by extraordinary resilience. It was this strength and determination that led her to become the first family therapist at Northwest Suburban Youth Services Bureau, now known as Northeast Youth & Family Services. Over the course of 33 years, Kay led with conviction and compassion, becoming President and CEO in 1988, ultimately retiring in 2009. Under her care, the organization expanded its programs, deepened community relationships, and opened new possibilities. On November 14, 2024, Kay passed away peacefully at age 82, leaving behind a legacy rooted in authenticity, courage, and unwavering purpose — a life lived, as she titled her own memoir, My Way. As we look to the future, Kay's imprint is everywhere. Her impact on Northeast Youth & Family Services is immeasurable, and we are deeply grateful for the vision she brought to our community. In her honor, NYFS established an endowment to support generations to come. To contribute to the Kay Andrews Legacy Endowment, contact Pamela Yang at 651-379-3451 or pamela.yang@nyfs.org. RELATIONSHIP -CENTERED We value relationships as the most critical component of change. Growth and DEVELOPMENT healing happen in the 8 ATTACHMENT context affirming, O We incorporate responsive, empathic individual's car relationships. L We consider family, 1 social, system, and societal impacts on individual wellbeing. We are each a part of a greater ecosystem, and we seek to engage day-to-day supports to catalyze change. TRAUMA -RESPONSIVE We recognize the prevalence of trauma and stress in people's lives, and we address the impact of these experiences to support recovery. We do this by emphasizing safety and stability, client voice and choice, trust and collaboration, and empowerment in care. an egiving experiences and 'developmental goals across the lifespan. This ensures services are attuned to an individual's developmental needs and growth. CULTURALLY RESPONSIVE We honor the importance of an individual's culture in shaping their worldview. We work together to incorporate each individual's unique context and needs to promote healing and resilience. COMMUNITY We believe community is the foundation of our individual wellbeing and collective strength. We foster community connection and vitality to facilitate deeper restoration and growth NYFS.ORG 9 Supporting Youth,, Strengthening Futures When NYFS opened its doors in 1976, the community made something clear: young people need support, opportunity, and guidance. That belief shaped our earliest work and continues to guide us nearly 50 years later. hat began as a small effort to keep youth engaged and connected has grown into what is now the Youth Pathways Program. We are committed to helping youth move through mistakes, access support, and build a stronger future. Youth Pathways offers pre-trial diversion services for youth ages 12-17 who have committed a chargeable offense. Referrals come from the Ramsey County Attorney's Office, schools, caregivers, and local law enforcement. Whichever way the referral arrives, every journey begins with a conversation with the youth and their caregiver to understand who they are and what support will help them most. From there, we build a personalized contract that often includes community service, apology letters, regular school attendance, participation in seminars, or referrals for chemical and mental health support. Throughout the process, staff remain a consistent presence, checking in and encouraging progress step by step. Our goal is accountability paired with growth, using a restorative justice approach that helps youth repair harm, learn new skills, and choose a better path forward. This process has been proven successful: caregiver surveys conducted 6-9 months after completion show that only 7.8% of youth we served reoffended this year. This is a powerful reminder of what can happen when youth have support rather than punishment alone. `I am proud to be closer to my values and hold them to higher standards. " Community Connection Groups To further support youth, we also offer Community Connection groups, a seven -week cohort -based model focused on building confidence, social skills, and resilience. Together, youth explore careers, reflect on personal goals, volunteer, and connect with organizations across the community. For many, it is the first time they see themselves not by what they've done, but by what they're capable of. 0 CLARITY IN MOTION 1 2024-2025 REPORT TO THE COMMUNITY ,, 60 Over time, we've continued to adapt the program to match the evolving needs of youth and families. • We expanded staff training to include motivational interviewing and trauma -informed care. • We strengthened collaboration across NYFS to offer a broader continuum of support. • We deepened partnerships with schools and providers and brought Community Connections into an educational setting through Fairview Alternative High School. To reflect these continued pathways of possibility, the program officially became Youth Pathways — signaling many directions, many options, and many futures. PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS: FY25 94% of youth who engaged in an intake successfully completed their contracts. 80% of surveyed youth reported that the program helped them accept and take personal responsibility for their actions. recidivism rate 7.8%of youth. 860/oconnections of community participants agree or strongly agree that they gained knowledge about what they can do in the future and resources to benefit them. "Something that I am proud of as a result of my involvement in this program is I map out my goals and how to start thinking ahead of time. I am also proud of the fact that I have questions to ask myself in a risky situation." NYFS.ORG 7 ON -SITE PANTRY PROVIDES ESSENTIAL RESOURCES We're proud to share our new on -site pantry, created to fill critical gaps by providing food, hygiene products, and household essentials when they are needed most. Clients can access items during appointments, allowing them to focus more fully on their health and healing without worrying about their next meal. With simple, grab -and -go options ready to take home, the pantry also supports those who may be navigating housing insecurity or transportation challenges. This pantry was made possible by the generosity of the White Bear Area Food Shelf, the Vadnais Heights Area Community Foundation, and the Northeast Metro Golden K Kiwanis Club. CENTENNIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT PARTNERSHIP A partnership with Centennial School District was launched to bring- ri enhanced services directly into local schools. This brought three r/f� therapists to Pines School, Centennial Middle School, and Centennial 1 High School to provide more intensive support to a smaller number of students with greater needs.. �a On -site services allow students to stay in school, participate in s their regular classes, and remain connected to their friends, thus reducing the need for higher levels of care outside the r school environment. ` f � EMPOWERED GENERATIONS ® We are thrilled and honored to partner with the University of Minnesota researchers Christopher Mehus, PhD, LMFT, and Jaime Ballard, PhD out of the Family Social Science Department to research the efficacy of a short-term parenting intervention for children ages 3-8 with mild to moderate behavioral challenges. Over the course of this year, 10 NYFS clinicians have been trained in Empowered Generations, a culturally responsive, evidence - based, six -session parenting intervention designed to support parents and their young children. 1 USING GROUP THERAPY TO REACH MORE CLIENTS Group therapy offers our clients a unique space for healing. This approach is a powerful, evidence -based tool for transformation because healing does not happen in isolation. In a circle of peers, clients build trust and experience the relief of knowing they are not alone. Within this circle, peer relationships become the catalyst for change. This year, NYFS put a special focus on expanding group offerings. As we grow, we're grateful to witness the courage that unfolds when people come together to heal. i 1 8 CLARITY IN MOTION 1 2024-2025 REPORT TO THE COMMUNITY NYFS Staff Lucy Amis-Rosario MSW, LICSW Sarah Geisbauer Sarah Lockhart MSW, LICSW Leng Thao Director of Evaluation Client Services Coordinator Director of Mental Health Client Services Coordinator and Training Sophie Guterl Msw, LGSW Samantha Lueck Msw, LGSW and Accountant Specialist Mosope Ani Msw, LGSW Clinic -Based Therapist Restoring Power Therapist April Thompson MSW, LGSW Clinic -Based Therapist Lexa Harmon Carl Luepker MCMHs, MED School -Based Therapist Vanessa Anton Msw, T-LGSW Restoring Power Adult Clinic -Based Therapist Nichole Thompson Clinic -Based and Restoring Advocate Leah Martin MSW, LICSW Office and Billing Manager Power Therapist Rozzy Hartsel MSMHS Clinic -Based Program Ka Vang Muno Ashiro Msw, LGSW School -Based Therapist Manager Human Resources Manager School -Based Therapist Melanie Haynes Msw, LGSW Isabela Mastel Msw, LGSW Saabirah Venson Carolyn Babekuhl MSW, LICSW School -Based Therapist Clinic -Based Therapist School -Based Therapist School -Based Therapist and Pa Her Sam McGinnity Intern Clinical Supervisor Development and Youth Pathways Supervisor Rachel Weiss Joannah Bluntach Communications Specialist Morgan Merritt MA, ATR-BC, LAMFT DNP, CNP, PMHNP-BC Kania Johnson Community Advocate School -Based Therapist Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner Clinic -Based Therapist Intern Dawn Murawski Msw, LGSW Stacy Xiong Elizabeth Keillor MSW, LGSW Clinic -Based Therapist School -Based Therapist Cierra Brown Youth Pathways Specialist Clinic -Based Therapist Caleb Petersen MA, LAMFT Intern Lauren Kelzenberg Clinic -Based Therapist Pamela Yang Kendra Coop Msw, LGSW MSW, LGSW Director of Development School -Based Therapist School -Based Therapist Jen Prock Director of Finance Hannah Nelson Amanda DonleyMA Hannah Kermott Msw, LGSW School -Based Therapist P Restoring Power Clinic -Based Therapist Trisha Sargent MSW, LICSW Intern Youth Advocate Cari Kokotovich PSyD, LP Restoring Power Therapist and Clinical Operations Amelia Olson Ally Droubie Psychological Evaluation Supervisor Restoring Power Intern Casual Administrative Worker Program Supervisor Nyes Shuck MSW, LICSW Jasmine Wong Abbie Lane MSW, LICSW Clinic -Based Therapist Youth Pathways Intern Claribel Ezennia Psychological Evaluation Director of Community Services Angie Siegle MA, LMFT Wendy Golden School -Based Therapist Practicum Student School -Based Therapist Intern Becca Feia MSW, LGSW Angela Lewis-Dmello MSW, LICSW Jackie Suchy MA, LPCC Clinic -Based Therapist President and CEO School -Based Therapist NYFS Board of Directors OFFICERS MEMBERS Jennifer Fink, Chair Brion Curran City of New Brighton State Representative District 368 Douglas Annett, Vice Chair MN Dept. of Wayne Groff Human Services City of Roseville Shunzyu Haigler Joanna Bugbee, Secretary Bridging MN NMDP Jonelle Henry Nyle Zikmund, Treasurer Mounds View Parks City of Mounds View and Recreation Emily Rousseau, Jan Jenson Governance Chair Village of St. Anthony City of Arden Hills Jennifer Lodin Mounds View Public Schools Angie Malone City of Little Canada Kelly Miller Ramsey County Commissioner District 7 Shelly Myrland City of Shoreview James Wassenberg City of Falcon Heights Andrea West City of White Bear Lake Ben Zender Mounds View Police NYFS.ORG i � - ZA � KX\ w-mr Financial Position: FY2025 Statement of Activities July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2025 Without With Donor Donor Restrictions Restrictions Total SUPPORT AND REVENUE Support: Grants and Contributions $682,828 $47,000 $729,828 Municipality Contract Revenue 503,764 - 503,764 In -Kind Contributions 193,953 193,953 Special Event Revenue - Net of Expenses 57,691 - 57,691 Total Support 1,438,236 47,000 1,438,236 Revenue: Program Service Fees 2,062,097 - 2,062,097 Rental Income 443,015 443,015 Investment Inc (Loss) 3,340 3,340 Gain on the Sale of Building 2,370,506 2,370,506 Miscellaneous 31,838 31,838 Total Revenue 4,910,796 4,910,796 Net Assets Released from Restrictions 76,042 (76,042) - Total Support and Revenue 6,425,074 (29,042) 6,396,032 EXPENSES Program Services: Mental Health 2,841,263 2,841,263 Community Services 349,170 349,170 Total Program Services 3,190,433 3,190,433 Supporting Services: Management and General 1,078,428 1,078,428 Fundraising 182,709 182,709 Total Supporting Services 1,261,137 1,261,137 Total Expenses 4,451,570 4,451,570 INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS 1,973,504 (22,778) 1,944,462 Net Assets - Beginning of Year 601,387 66,042 667,429 NET ASSETS - END OF YEAR $2,574,891 $37,000 $2,611,891 0 o/ REVENUE Individuals: $71,223.03 Municipalities: $503, 763.81 Grants: $656,495.05 Contracts: $909,185.63 Third Party Billing and Fees: $1,467,546.00 Occupancy: $443,015.73 Investments: $3,339.52 EXPENDITURES Mental Health: $2,841,361.10 Community Services: $349,175.70 Management and General: $1,089,579.07 Fundraising: $182,709.57 10 CLARITY IN MOTION 1 2024-2025 REPORT TO THE COMMUNITY Donors: FY2025 Thank you to our Donors! ORGANIZATIONS Atonement Lutheran Church Catholic Financial Life Foundation Compass Pro Bono Dellwood Foundation Erickson, Bell, Beckman & Quinn, P.A. Falcon Heights -Lauderdale Lions Club Farmers & Merchants Savings Bank Frandsen Bank & Trust Greater White Bear Lake Community Foundation KB Consulting Maguire Agency Mounds View Lions Club Mutual of America New Brighton Lions Club Northeast Metro Golden K Kiwanis Club The Rasmussen - Northeast Bank Foundation Richard M. Schulze Family Foundation Ryan Companies Sable Design Sound Mind Project St. Michael's Lutheran Church Steele & Hops Strategic Consulting & Coaching Techie Dudes The Lilian Wright & C. Emil Berglund Foundation The Peter]. King Family Foundation UnitedHealth Group Vadnais Heights Community Foundation Vadnais Heights Lions Club White Bear Lake Lions Club INDIVIDUALS Laura Accomando Joseph Adams Andrew Ahlberg Graeme Allen Mary Anders Morris Kay Andrews Douglas Annett Dean and Debra Armstrong Robert Ash John Bachhuber Jane Bacon Mary Bandt Matt Bauer Carmen Bell Beckman Caroline Bell Beckman Breanna Bennewitz Kelly Bennewitz Connie Bernardy Bruce Bester Varsha Bhatia Steve Bloom James L. Bowyer Michael Bradley Patrick Brama Taycia Brandon Josh Brandsted Lonnie and Mariann Brokke Sally Brown Gerald Bruzek Lisa Bryans Mary Burg Janelle Calhoun Luke Cardona Keith and Nannette Carlson Theresa Cermak Paul and Kathy Ciernia Julie Clark Matthew and Diane Clysdale Sharon and Charles Clysdale John Connelly Sehoya Cotner Lindy Crawford Colleen Crockford Bethlyn Cummings Stacey Cummings Brian Curran David and Debra Czech Imogen A. Davis Kirsten Dawson Monica Day Denise and John Delahanty Sue Denkinger Sandra Deutsch John Doan Trish Donley Sarah Dye Eric and Teri Eberhardt Kevin Edberg Val Eisele Aisha Elmquist Don Engel Jason and Jessica Etten David and Gwen Evans Jennifer Fink Hallie Finucane Steven Firkus Judy and Brian Flaten Rebecca Forman Gina Foschi Maureen Francis Nicole Frethem Michael Frey Heather Gannon Paul and Michelle Gardner Ellen Gevers Diane Glasheen Kitty Gogins Michele Gran Anthony Graves Roger and Mindy Greiling Nick Gross Mark Grossklaus Sherry Gunn Randall and Lynette Gustafson Paul Hanneman Diane Hansen Martha Hardesty Frank Harris Erich Hartmann Nancy Hauschild Sandy Haynes James Hedeen Sherren and Tim Heil Heidi and Ronald Heller Amy Henriksen July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2025 We are deeply grateful for your generous support. Scott and Julie Henry Thomas Hess Kathleen and Sol Heyman Liza Hill Nicole Hill Edwin Hodder Melissa Hoffer Ken Hola Sharon Hood James and Janelle House Jerry Hromatka and Cathy Schoener Thomas lannelli and Linda Ayers Kathy Ingulsrud-Stjevn Paul and Denise Jacobsen Bob Jacobson Jessica Jagoe Chad Jayasekera Tara Jebens-Singh Darin Johnson Matthew Johnson Lisa T. Joyslin Tascha Just Joe Kasel Kevin Keenan Sharon Kelly and Thomas Broich Barbara and Steven Kokotovich Virginia Kremer George Krienke Naomi Krueger Jodi Laliberte Barbara Leary Janice Leitschuh Angela Lewis-Dmello and Leon Dmello Peter and Nicole Lindstrom Jack and Laura Linehan Amanda Little Christie Lockhart Eva Lockhart James M. Lockhart Jennifer Lockhart Jennifer Lodin Keith and Kendal Loewen Carl and Lucia Luepker Ellen and Russell Luepker Erik Lund Susan Lund Teri Lutz Kerry Luyster Susan Lyon Angela Malone Allison Marshall Sandy Martin Devin Massopust Virginia McCoy Scott McCune Tamara McGehee Bryan and Karin McGinnis Alison and Anthony McGinnity Kim and Gary Meehlhause Nicole and Randall Meeker Elizabeth Mercer -Taylor James W. Meyer Leeann and Bruce Meyer Paula Mielke David Miller Rita Mills Geoffrey Milsow Luanne Minke Emily Mobley Tena Monson Antonio Montez Aileen Moore Kari Moore David Morris Deborah Mullen George and Judith Murakami Joseph Murphy Krista Murray Paul and Ann Myers Shelly Myrland Lindsay Nauen and Richard Weil Sara Nephew Terrance Newby Elisabeth Nowak Rebecca and Todd Olson Colleen O'Neil John and Marla Ordway Sarah Osterman Renae Oswald -Anderson Daniel Owens Elizabeth Padesky Susan Peacock Gloria Pederson John Pellegrini Beth Perra Lindsay Pesonen Alicia Petersen Perry Petersen Jerald Peterson Kent and Diane Peterson Mary and Douglas Peterson Ryan Poepard Sandi and Leroy Poppe Duane Pulford Urho and Pamela Rahkola Victoria Reinhardt John and Sandra Robinson Daniel Roe Jessica Roessler Natalie Romero Emily Rousseau Lizz Sable Stauning Kristine Sanow Erin Sarles Erika Scheider Jane and Joseph Scheidnes Eileen Schirer Michael Scholl Robin Schroeder Lawrence Schumacher Marta Simpson Nick and Sarah Simpson Sally and Jillian Simpson Carol Sletner Howell Smith, II Jennie Sorenson Michael and Cindy Spellman Cory Springhorn Sara Stafki Cynthia and Mark Stange Corey Stauffeneker Jason Steffenhagen Jeff Stephenson June Stewart Mary Stewart Anthony Stieber Justin Stofferahn Brian Strub Amelia Swisher Maijala Janet Switala Paul Talarico Troy Thielen Michael Tierney Angel Toro Mike and Amanda Totzke Patrick Trudgeon Dawn Tucker Virginia and Thomas Turba Zoey Wainberg Russell and Josey Warren James and Deena Wassenberg Ann Watson Ami Wazlawik Kurtis Weber Tyler Weers Kari Weiss Leigh Weiss Steve Wellington Rev. Roland and Brenda Wells Teresa Wernecke Eric Williams Julie Williams Roger Williams Anna and Paul Winter Gina Wood Janv Xiong Mee Yang Pamela Yang Joshua Young Corey and Kathryn Yunke Debbie and John Zamow Linda Zelig Ben Zender Judy Zewers Darin Zielsdorf Theresa and Nyle Zikmund Kathy Zwonitzer GIVING CIRCLE Members made a three-year commitment to contribute annually. Anonymous Douglas Annett Matt Bauer Mary Burg Heidi Danielson Wayne Groff and James Dryden Karla Leis Ronald and Kathy Lutes Kari Niedfeldt-Thomas Daniel Owens Riz Prakasim Robert Seybold Prajwal Vemireddy Please accept our sincere apologies if we omitted or misspelled your name. Notify us of corrections by calling (651) 379-3451. NYFS.ORG • NYFS Northeast Youth & Family Services 3490 Lexington Ave N, Suite 205 Shoreview, MN 55126 Clarity in Motion. When our community thrives, we all move forward. Join us in investing in this work. Your support transforms lives by ensuring access to care that nurtures healing, cultivates community, and inspires hope. Nearly half of our clients cannot afford the full cost of their care and we rely on generous donations from individuals and our community to ensure that those who need our help will receive it regardless of financial circumstances. Please donate online at nyfs.org/donate 0 kip or mail your donation to: ' .r Northeast Youth & Family Services 3490 Lexington Ave. N., Suite 205 0 } 'r Shoreview, MN 55126 Learn about other ways to donate at nyfs.org/donate/options RM Thank you for your support! STAND DS PRSRT STD US POSTAGE PAID TWIN CITIES MN PERMIT NO. 6970 ©2026 Northeast Youth & Family Services. All rights reserved. Attachment C Our mission is to transform lives by ensuring access to care that nurtures healing, cultivates community, and inspires hope. welcome Northeast Youth & Family Services is a community -based, trauma -informed, and culturally responsive nonprofit mental health and social service agency. We serve clients of all ages and specialize in care attuned to each individual's development. Our commitment to equity, authenticity, and community -driven services provides hope for many in our community who face financial, cultural, linguistic, and logistical barriers to care. Our sliding -fee scale means our doors are open to all, regardless of financial circumstances. Our focus on transformative relationships informs our collaboration with families, schools, cities, and public safety departments. This approach enhances the positive impact on our clients and the communities we serve. Together, we are doing so much more than we could ever achieve on our own. community - centered committed NYFS.ORG Mental Health Services NYFS Mental Health Services are culturally responsive, trauma - informed, and community -driven, provided by clinicians skilled in working with all ages. We offer an accessible sliding fee scale, accept most insurances, and offer in -person and telehealth services to ensure access to care. Clinic -Based Therapy We collaborate with clients to develop clear goals and personalized plans to treat challenging symptoms, increasing mental health and wellbeing. We believe healing and growth occur when clients more deeply understand their needs and experiences through a supportive relationship with a skilled, compassionate provider. Our goal is to offer clients quality mental health treatment within the context of their culture and lived experiences. We provide individual, couple, family, and group psychotherapy services attuned to the needs of each client. We work with the full age spectrum, with specialized services that address needs at every stage of life. We support clients with a wide range of mental health concerns including depression, anxiety, ADHD, autism, stress and trauma, grief and loss, family conflict, and identity development, among others. In addition to therapy, we offer multidisciplinary care including psychiatric services for children, adolescen and adults, as well as psychological evaluations for children and adolescents. Our evaluators are skilled in diagnosing autism, ADHD, and trauma -related conditions. proud to meet clients where they are and support them throughout their healing journey. School -Based Therapy In partnership with three northeast metro school districts, we offer comprehensive and accessible mental health support to students by providing care onsite, embedded in their school. We provide individual and group therapy to address issues related to anxiety, depression, trauma, and other concerns from early childhood through high school. Our therapists collaborate with school staff to support students' mental health needs in the classroom. They also serve as a resource for the entire school, sharing their expertise and helping staff address broader mental health challenges. This contributes to better social, emotional, and academic outcomes for students, teachers, and schools as a whole. � Ire- .,'�► '�'' •' � . I L Community Services NYFS Community Services helps individuals and families regain stability, build resilience, and access resources that promote health and healing. Youth Pathways We provide empowering services to youth and their families by offering an alternative to the traditional juvenile justice system. Our services promote youth accountability, meet individual and family underlying needs, reduce recidivism, and offer youth a vision for their own purpose and potential. YOUTH DIVERSION: Youth Diversion serves youth ages 12-17 who have justice system involvement including illegal behavior such as theft, disorderly conduct, or alcohol/drug use. Using restorative principles, we help youth take accountability for the incident and harm caused, build positive decision - making skills, and get back on track. We provide an intake meeting with a caregiver and create an individualized contract based on their needs. Contracts often include community service, seminar attendance with a caregiver, apology letters, chemical or mental health referrals, drug testing, and/or restitution. We also provide regular check -ins with staff for support. By addressing underlying needs, we significantly reduce the likelihood that youth will reoffend in the future. COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS: Community Connections is a seven -week, group -based experience for youth that builds social skills, self-confidence, and resilience through career exploration, self -reflection, volunteer activities, and contacts with other community organizations. We offer this to youth who will benefit from building deeper, healthier connections with their peers, adults, and community. Together, we focus on community service, work skills identification, and development of key life skills such as nutrition, fitness, time management and routines, and budgeting. We create opportunities for youth to build meaningful connections with their peers and supportive adults, while learning about resources in their community that will help them now and in the future. Community Advocate Program In partnership with five local law enforcement departments, our community advocate co -creates public safety by supporting community members whose needs fall outside the scope of law enforcement. We serve adults through short-term resources and referrals or long-term case management. Within a harm reduction framework, our advocate provides: crisis stabilization services, community resources, economic assistance, referrals for mental health and/or chemical health services, housing support, senior services, and parenting resources. Our advocate strengthens the community by addressing the individual community member's underlying needs while reducing reliance on law enforcement. They serve as a bridge between community members, law enforcement, case managers, and family/caregivers. Domestic Violence & Sexual Assault Services NYFS Restoring Power offers a trauma -informed, multi- disciplinary model for domestic and sexual violence services that integrates advocacy and therapy, ensuring comprehensive support provided at no cost. Restoring Power Restoring Power supports victim -survivors who have experienced a range of abusive behaviors, including emotional, psychological, physical, financial, technological, and/or sexual violence. Our services are for victim -survivors at any place in their journey — from the first call for help to healing years after the abuse. We work with children, adolescents, adults, and families to access: • Advocacy support with safety planning • Emotional support and coping skills • Learning about abuse, its effects, and opportunities for healing • Information about victim rights and resources • Case management and resource referral • Legal advocacy - applying for an Order for Protection or Harassment and Restraining Order • Individual and Group Therapy Our therapy services are provided by trauma -informed, domestic and sexual violence informed therapists skilled at trauma healing with all ages. Our groups include Teen Healthy Relationships, Child Witnessing of Domestic Violence, Adult Victim -Survivor of Domestic Violence, and Adult Victim -Survivor of Sexual Violence. Our services emphasize connection, support, healing, and psychoeducation. A thriving community lifts us all. Nearly half of our clients cannot afford the full cost of their care and we rely on generous donations from individuals and our community to ensure that those who need our help will receive it regardless of financial circumstances. Please donate online at nyfs.org/donate lo,.0 or mail your donation to: Northeast Youth and Family Services 3490 Lexington Ave. N., Suite 205 Shoreview, MN 55126 Thank you for your support! OUR VALUES MEETS NYFS is a nonprofit 501(c)3 organization. STAND DS Your donation is tax deductible as allowed by law. DIGITAL VERSIONS OF THIS BROCHURE AVAILABLE HERE: ENGLISH HMONG r� rNAjP4,N1 SOMALI SPANISH • N'fFS Northeast Youth & Family Services Transforming Lives Shoreview Headquarters 3490 Lexington Avenue North, Suite 205 Shoreview, MN 55126 Phone: (651) 486-3808 Fax: (651) 486-3858 White Bear Lake Clinic 1280 North Birch Lake Blvd. White Bear Lake, MN 55110 Phone: (651) 429-8544 Fax: (651) 407-5301 OUR PARTNERS MUNICIPALITIES Arden Hills Birchwood Village Falcon Heights Hugo Little Canada Lauderdale Mahtomedi Mounds View New Brighton North Oaks Roseville Saint Anthony Village Shoreview Vadnais Heights White Bear Lake White Bear Township SCHOOL DISTRICTS Centennial Schools Mounds View Public Schools St. Anthony - New Brighton Schools PUBLIC SAFETY Mounds View New Brighton Ramsey County Attorney's Office Roseville Saint Anthony Village White Bear Lake NYFSorg O Northeast Youth & Family Services NYFS.ORG ©2025 Northeast Youth & Family Services. All rights reserved. Attachment D TRANSFORMATIONAL MODEL OF CARE NTFS RELATIONSHIP-CE We value relationship: most critical componE of change. Growth an healing happen in the context of affirming, responsive, empathic relationships. PERSON -IN - ENVIRONMENT We consider family, social, system, and societal impacts on individual wellbeing. We are each a part of a greater ecosystem, and we seek to engac day-to-day supports catalyze change. IP3iyl: We recognize the prevalence of trauma and stress in people's lives, and we address the impact of these experiences to support recovery. We do this by emphasizing safety and stability, client voice and choice, trust and collaboration, and empowerment in care. Northeast Youth 8 Family Services Transforming Lives LOPMENT ►TTACHMENT le incorporate an individual's caregiving experiences and developmental goals across the lifespon. This ensures services are attuned to an individual's developmental needs and growth. CULTURALLY ESPONSIVE e honor the importance vi an individual's culture in shaping their worldview. We work together to incorporate each individual's unique context and needs to promote healing and resilience. COMMUNITY We believe community is the foundation of our individual wellbeing and collective strength. We foster community connection and vitality to facilitate deeper restoration and growth. IULY2025 ©2025 Northeast Youth & Family Services. All rights reserved. PUBLIC PRESENTATION - 5B 75 Years MEMORANDUM DATE: May 11, 2026 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Jessica Jagoe, City Administrator FROM: David Swearingen, Public Works Director/City Engineer SUBJECT: Proclamation in Recognition of National Public Works Week Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A Council Should Consider • Adopting a Proclamation formally designating May 17-23, 2026 as National Public Works Week in Arden Hills. Backiround/Discussion National Public Works Week is a celebration of thousands of men and women in North America who provide and maintain the infrastructure and services collectively known as public works. Instituted as a public education campaign by the American Public Works Association in 1960, the weeklong celebration calls attention to the importance of public works. This year's theme is "Rooted in Service, Powered by Community" for the National Public Works Week poster. The poster acknowledges that the roots of service run deep in public works. It's what has propelled public works innovations that have helped our communities evolve into places where people can lead lives of purpose and possibility. Some work, like building roads and bridges, is highly visible, while other public works contributions such as maintaining water and sewer systems are sometimes hidden from view. Together, these efforts form the foundation of thriving communities, reminding us that every project, seen or unseen, powers the connection between service and the people it supports. Our Arden Hills Public Works employees take great pride in their work. The week of May 17-23, 2026 honors these professionals who serve the public good every day with quiet dedication. Attachments Attachment A: Proclamation Page l of 1 e75 rs 7Yeaj, CITY OF ARDEN HILLS COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA PROCLAMATION To recognize May 17-23, 2026 as National Public Works Week WHEREAS, public works services provided in our community are an integral part of our citizens' everyday lives; and WHEREAS, the support of an understanding and informed citizenry is vital to the efficient operation of public works systems and programs such as water, sewers, streets and highways, public buildings, and solid waste collection; and WHEREAS, the health, safety and comfort of this community greatly depends on these facilities and services; and WHEREAS, the quality and effectiveness of these facilities, as well as their planning, design, and construction, are vitally dependent upon the efforts and skill of public works officials; and WHEREAS, the efficiency of the qualified and dedicated personnel who staff public works departments is materially influenced by the people's attitude and understanding of the importance of the work they perform, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL formally designates May 17-23, 2026, as National Public Works Week in THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, and calls upon all citizens and civic organizations to acquaint themselves with the issues involved in providing our public works and to recognize the contributions which public works officials make every day to our health, safety, comfort, and quality of life. &dl-44 13,E � David Grant, Mayor Emily Rousseau, Councilmember Kur Weber, Councilmember Brenda Holden, Councilmember Tena Monson, Councilmember PUBLIC PRESENTATION - 5C MEMORANDUM DATE: May 11, 2026 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Jessica Jagoe, City Administrator SUBJECT: Proclamation in Recognition of Police Week in Ramsey County Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A Council Should Consider • Adopting a Proclamation formally designating May 11-16, 2026 as Police Week in Ramsey County. Back2round/Discussion Each year the City Council is requested to recognize Police Week by adopting a proclamation as provided by the Ramsey County Sheriff's Office. This proclamation honors the service and recognizes the sacrifice of law enforcement officers everywhere as they protect our communities. Budget Impact None Attachment Attachment A: Proclamation ptesent_F t" oAttachment A Qas Gw b $ CITY OF ARDEN HILLS COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA Police Week in Ramsey County May 11-16, 2026 WHEREAS, In 1962, President Kennedy proclaimed May 15 as National Peace Officers Memorial Day and the calendar week in which May 15 falls, as National Police Week; and WHEREAS, There are approximately 900,000 law enforcement officers serving in communities across the United States, including the dedicated members of the Ramsey County Sheriff's Office; and WHEREAS, uniformed Patrol Sworn Staff dedicated to the contract cities include Deputies, including K9 handlers and their K9 Partners, patrol shifts, school resource officers, and water patrol deputies; and WHEREAS, the Ramsey County Criminal Investigative Unit contains sworn investigators including dedicated sex crimes investigator, Civilian Analysts/support staff and the Electronic Crimes Unit; and WHEREAS, National Police Week pays special recognition to law enforcement officers who have lost their lives in the line of duty for the safety and protection of others; and WHEREAS, The service and sacrifice of Ramsey County suburban law enforcement officers who died in the line of duty will be honored during the Ramsey County Suburban Law Enforcement Memorial Ceremony on May 141h, 2026; NOW THEREFORE BE IT PROCLAIMED, The City of Arden Hills City Council recognizes May 11-16, 2026 as Police Week in Arden Hills, Minnesota, and publicly salutes the service of law enforcement officers in our communitv and in communities across the nation.d,loif _OA0 �1' ,� David Grant, Mayor —e - e . V-1--- Emily Rousseau, Councilmember Kurt ber, Councilmember Brenda Holden, Councilmember Tena Monson, Councilmember MEMORANDUM DATE: May 11, 2026 STAFF COMMENTS - 6A TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Jessica Jagoe, City Administrator FROM: David Swearingen, Public Works Director/City Engineer SUBJECT: Transportation Update Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: A verbal update will be provided at the City Council meeting. Page 1 of 1 DRAFT FT Qxesent-F 75 Years c' 4r Z q Qa e �e N� NON Approved: May 11, 2026 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION APRIL 13, 2026 5:30 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Grant called to order the City Council Work Session at 5:30 p.m. Present: Mayor David Grant; Councilmembers Brenda Holden, Tena Monson, Emily Rousseau and Kurt Weber Absent: None Also present: City Administrator Jessica Jagoe, Public Works Director/City Engineer David Swearingen, Finance Director Joua Yang, Assistant Public Works Director Lucas Miller, Community Development Director Jake Reilly, Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk Julie Hanson, and Senior Planner Elena Fransen Councilmember Monson proposed tonight's agenda be rearranged to make sure there is time to discuss items that have been on the agenda for some time and time has not allowed for those discussions. She would like to discuss ADUs first, the EDC Work Plan and the CIP Equipment before recessing for the Council Meeting. Councilmember Monson also would like to discuss rearranging future City Council Meeting agendas so that any item that requires action, along with a Public Hearing can be completed under the Public Hearing section of the agenda, rather than New Business. That would allow for the public to hear the result of the item, without waiting through additional public hearings. Mayor Grant said he and City Administrator Jagoe arranged tonight's City Council meeting a little better, placing the public interest items at the top. He said Council can discuss this, if there is interest. Councilmember Holden said we've always strived to have items that require discussion with a non -staff presenter/guest at the top. If we move ADUs to the top, the EDC Commissioners for that ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — APRIL 13, 2026 2 discussion will have to wait. She also thinks people who want to hear the ADU discussion may not have arrived yet, thinking that discussion will take place later. Councilmember Rousseau said she is generally in favor of that but tonight she would love to have the EDC Commissioners come first. There are four commissioners and Senior Planner Fransen here for that discussion. City Administrator Jagoe said the Community Development Director has not arrived yet and he will be leading the ADU discussion. She noted that Senior Communications Coordinator Michlig is in attendance to discuss the State of the City item. She said the agenda setting format is scheduled to be discussed at the April 27 meeting. That would allow us to decide on format prior to the May meetings where planning cases will be presented. Councilmember Weber said despite the fact that there are others waiting for other topics, he is eager to discuss ADUs and wouldn't want it to continue to be pushed out because we don't have time to get to it. Mayor Grant said the State of the City Discussion should be brief. We have EDC members present. He proposed those discussions should be first and the ADU discussion can be moved up, prior to the Public Works discussion. Councilmember Monson does not want to talk about State of the City before ADUs, the EDC Work Plan or the CIP. She doesn't care what order those items are discussed in, but those are the three she would like to see at that top. Councilmember Rousseau would like to focus on the EDC. She appreciates that the State of the City is on the agenda, however we have been waiting months to discuss ADUs. She is okay with omitting the State of the City discussion, for tonight. Mayor Grant proposed striking State of the City for tonight and Senior Communication Coordinator Michlig can send her questions to Council via email. He would like to have the EDC discussion first, ADUs second and the Public Works CIP Equipment discussion third. Council agreed to that reorganization of the agenda topics. 1. PUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL None. 2. RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIES None. 3. AGENDA ITEMS State of the City Discus (Item 3A on published agenda. Struck from Agenda.) A. Economic Development Commission (EDC) Work Plan (Item 3B on published agenda) ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — APRIL 13, 2026 3 Senior Planner Fransen, Economic Development Commission Chair Jud Murchie, Commissioners Ihsan Isik, Kristine Poelzer and Ted Brausen introduced themselves and joined the discussion. Senior Planner Fransen said there have been conversations surrounding how the EDC can help serve the Arden Hills community. The commission has been working on building momentum over the past few years. The Work Plan was developed with the City's 2026-2027 Strategic Plan in mind. Commissioners identified a mission that states the EDC is a bridge connecting Arden Hills businesses with the City. Their goals include the EDC connecting with businesses to understand their needs, as well as leveraging the City's operations to support Arden Hills business. She noted the EDC's work on Sign Code. She also outlined that the EDC participated in in -person visits to business locations and facilitated a Common Grounds business event in 2025. EDC Chair Murchie said the EDC Members have been discussing how we can create spaces for businesses to connect with each other but also looking for opportunities to be a bridge between businesses and the City. He said the Sign Code is an example of where those two things overlap. We aren't saying what the Sign Code should be, but we can provide the feedback that we hear from the business community. He shared examples of how EDC can help produce newsletter features and suggest sponsorship costs for large events. Councilmember Holden said she knows commissioners are working hard but there hasn't been a lot of success. The survey results were disappointing. When asking businesses to complete a survey, you have to get the survey to the right person. The only way to do that is to go in person. She asked if any issues have been identified for why the survey didn't get a big response. EDC Commissioner Brausen said a lot of the businesses are franchised so you aren't going to find the owner there if you stop in. The owners want appointments. He thought we received some really good information. He believes that if the EDC continues to engage businesses with events like the Common Grounds breakfast, and businesses become aware of the work that the EDC is doing, it will help. He also said Arden Hills has never been known as a business -friendly community. That needs to change. Given support and the right education the EDC could help the City to attract new businesses. We shouldn't just be looking to the open land for business generation. We need to look at the established parts of Arden Hills. He said Council thinks about things differently than the residents and business owners on the EDC. We have to invest the time to work together. Councilmember Holden asked how the EDC can grow attendance at the business breakfast if one of the issues with the survey was franchising. EDC Commissioner Brausen said he thinks we were thinking too small. The survey should maybe have been targeted at the larger companies because they are the ones who will invest more in the City. We have to be prepared for TCAAP. That will be a really good tax base. Councilmember Holden said some of the property is owned by people or companies that aren't in Minnesota. She shared an example of one company that was doing business here but the building owner, who is based in New York, tripled the rent and that company had to move. She would like to see the EDC help problem solve for those situations. EDC Chair Murchie said those are the kinds of questions the EDC can take on. We can talk to business owners and see how often that is happening. Sometimes we hear from one or two people about something but everyone else is happy. EDC can help find the balance. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — APRIL 13, 2026 4 Councilmember Rousseau said she is hearing a need for engagement with the larger businesses. She said there is an opening on the EDC. She wondered if we have any contacts at the bigger companies that we could reach out to, to gauge interest in joining the commission. Mayor Grant asked what the work plan is with the Arden Hills/Shoreview Business Council. Senior Planner Fransen said the Twin City North Chamber of Commerce Business Council has been renamed Arden Hills/Shoreview Business Connect. The opportunities that the EDC identified are to take a more active role in those events. They have seen a lot of growth in attendance. The EDC is strategically considering how to engage with businesses at those events. EDC Chair Murchie said the EDC has members who are established business owners in Arden Hills but also new businesses. The EDC is asking how we can learn from those who have been here a long time and also bring new ideas. One thing we know is business owners are busy. Creating another meeting is not always the best thing. The Business Connect group will help us better engage and meet new partners in an established setting. We can use it to inform our own ideas for speakers. We can have a once -a -year EDC business event dedicated to just Arden Hills businesses. Councilmember Monson said she thinks the EDC is doing a great job and is learning what works and what doesn't from their previous efforts. She thinks the EDC Work Plan looks great. She wanted to highlight how helpful the Council Strategic Plan has been. It gave boundaries and this commission was able to drill down and directly link their work to the strategies City Council identified as priorities. Councilmember Weber said he appreciates what the EDC is doing. He pointed out that some of the survey respondents said "no" when asked if they would like to be contacted. He thinks some of the ideas like highlighting businesses in the newsletter will encourage more businesses to participate. EDC Chair Murchie said the more we engage, the more involvement we will get back. Councilmember Holden said when she was on the EDC years ago, most businesses were satisfied. There wasn't a lot of interest. That's how the EDC died out. She thinks the younger generation wants to be more involved. She said the Twin City North Chamber has a whole segment of their organization for manufacturing businesses. She cautioned about newsletter spotlights. If you highlight a new business, established businesses get upset. EDC Commissioner Brausen said (the City of) Ramsey has a sign that highlights businesses and recognizes milestones, not just new businesses. EDC Chair Murchie said the EDC is trying to understand how many of the businesses we actually know of. Do we have updated contact information? Do we know what that business does? How do we learn who else is out there and how do we reach them? Councilmember Rousseau said, as Council Liaison, she has heard a lot of great foundational conversations asking, "Who are we?" The commission has been very thoughtful about how to bring value to the community. She thinks this work plan will be a great guideline over the next two years. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — APRIL 13, 2026 5 Discussion ensued that the EDC can do a lot more, if Council wants it. It was suggested that the EDC have a booth at the 751h Anniversary Celebration. Further discussion ensued regarding in -person visits and how EDC will proceed with the visits seeking sponsorships. Staff updated how much has been collected in sponsorship support, noting that a few emails have been received showing interest. Mayor Grant thanked the EDC Members. He thinks this is a great work plan. B. Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Discussion (Item 3E on published agenda) Community Development Director Reilly said an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) is a permanent, self-contained residence. They can be inside an existing structure, an attached unit that does not have a door between the new unit and the existing structure or a detached stand-alone structure. There is also something called a junior ADU. He is researching that a little more. He understands them to be smaller units to the primary dwelling and may not be suitable for more than one person. He outlined that ADUs are not temporary medical dwelling units or granny pods, they aren't tiny homes on wheels or any other semi -permanent structure that could be rolled away on a trailer. ADUs are occupied year-round and can be rented or owned. They are not typically used as short term vacation rentals in metropolitan areas. Community Development Directory Reilly provided options for the Council's consideration when writing the ordinance. Some of the items to be discussed include: lot size, location of the lot within the city, how many total structures are allowed, and how many structures can be occupied full time. Something that is common is to allow additions only. That could include demolishing an existing garage to build in the same footprint or finishing out a basement. Other considerations include parking, design standards, number of stories, and foundation requirements. An approach that is becoming more common is having local architects create a catalog of designs that municipalities can adopt to remove the uncertainty. Additional considerations that would be in an ordinance include landscaping, impervious surface, and hard cover. Community Development Director Reilly said one aspect that is open to debate is to decide if utilities can be extended from the primary structure or if they need to connect directly into the water and wastewater system from the new residential unit. Council can also consider how these residential units can be used. Is it work space? Does the resident of the new unit need to be related to the existing owner? Must the main residence be owner occupied? Because this is two living spaces on one lot, a decision about whether one can be sold should be made. Community Development Director Reilly said it can take a while for communities to ramp up ADU construction. It can be expensive to build or add an ADU. People often take out a home equity line of credit. If someone converts a basement or garage, there could be less cost than to build a completely separate structure. Councilmember Holden said she keeps hearing "a lot of cities". She asked how "a lot" is measured. Is it five communities? Is it ten? Are they all in Minnesota? Community Development Director Reilly said it's thousands across the United States and hundreds in Minnesota. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — APRIL 13, 2026 6 Councilmember Monson said she spent time on the model local ADU ordinance from AARP. She thinks it outlines that it doesn't have to be overwhelming. A lot of the restrictions are already defined for existing residents. The reasoning behind their recommendations is sound. She supports a property owner's right to do what they need to do for their family. If we say they can't be rented, we may not see very many. Councilmember Weber said he spent time looking at the table of surrounding cities. Wastewater is charged based on water usage. He asked if Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen if he thinks an ADU would have its own meter, billing would go through the primary property. Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen said we would want to meter the water. He would hesitate to tie into the trunk main more than we need to for both water and sewer. He'd have to research it more to determine the best solution. He thinks it may be easier to have just one meter for billing purposes. Community Development Director Reilly said it has become more common for there to be separate meters for all units in rental properties, regardless of if there are 50 units or 2. Councilmember Weber said another concern is breakers. We wouldn't want a main breaker in the principal structure so the ADU wouldn't have access to it. Community Development Director Reilly said electricity would commonly be its own breaker for each residence. Councilmember Weber said it is an accessory unit. He presumes energy providers will prefer to go through the main unit. He thinks, of the cities on the table, Hopkins has the best layout. He is curious why some of the cities didn't include internal ADUs. He thinks that would be the most common. Community Development Director Reilly said a lot of those communities consider an attached and internal to be the same. They function the same so they didn't create different rules for them. Councilmember Weber wants to set guidelines but doesn't want there to be too much oversight. Prohibiting short-term rentals is important and more conversation is needed on additional parking. He thinks the occupants of the ADU are less likely to have their own transportation. Councilmember Rousseau said there are several things on the list that are musts for her. No short- term rentals, limiting it to one ADU and design standards that complement the principal structure. She would like to see this move forward. She asked what Staff need tonight to get us to the next stage of discussion. Community Development Director Reilly he said if each Councilmember could share their desired inclusions and what items are a definite no, it will be helpful to bring a more fleshed out draft ordinance, possibly in May. Councilmember Holden said the surrounding communities aren't in the table that was provided with the agenda packet. She talked to Roseville. They completed a 2-year study before passing their ADU ordinance. She thinks rental licensing is an important component to this. She thinks 10% of the city is rental property. This feels like step two in the rental licensing convesrsation, but we ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — APRIL 13, 2026 7 haven't completed step one. Homes are being bought up by corporations and they are renting them out and there's ten people living there. We can't stop that. There are so many issues with rental properties. One of the big things for this ordinance will be owner occupancy. We shouldn't support corporations increasing their rent potential by allowing them two units on one parcel. She doesn't like the idea of detached ADUs. She thinks it will change the neighborhood. The information in the packet says that was unfounded but that study was done in 2009. Things have changed a lot since then. Councilmember Holden continued, saying Roseville and Shoreview took two years and did a lot of work on their ordinances but we don't have that information. The packet outlines that this would not solve Arden Hills share of need, but we have met that need, based on the Metropolitan Council's numbers. She doesn't want ADUs to be detached. There should be no short-term rentals. We need to limit the number of ADUs allowed on each property. She would like to see rental licensing in place before allowing ADUs. She does not want to allow the ADU to be sold to another person. If a homeowner decides to build an ADU, those two structures should be owned by the same person. Otherwise, we have a duplex, and we have rules for that, already. She said having two units connected to the water and sewer system through one line, gets complicated. That is especially the case when you talk about the two structures being owned by different owners. Who's responsible for it then? Another thing to think about is we already know there are rental houses and people are living in basements with no egress windows. We know there are situations where there are more than four unrelated renters. We can't take blood samples. How do we deal with that? If ADUs are going to be open for everybody, the size needs to be big enough for everybody. If someone rents out an ADU, the utilities should be part of the rent with the ultimate responsibility falling on the owner. Mayor Grant would encourage that Council take the time to think this through. Once we do it, it can't easily be undone. He understands property rights. He thinks when most Arden Hills residents bought their homes, they didn't expect the neighbor to install a detached unit behind their home. What if someone lives on a lake? Can we allow construction of an ADU and block another resident's view of the lake? We have zoning code that says that it can't be done. He spent time in California where this is a popular solution, and they are using 1/4 and 3/4 to identify three or four addresses for one home. He thinks one of the occupants must be the owner. That will keep corporations from buying up all the available homes. He would prefer to see them be allowed internally only, in an upper story, a basement or above a garage. He doesn't want detached. Lot size should be a consideration. He agrees short-term rentals should not be allowed. He doesn't know how we can enforce allowing only long-term rentals because we don't have a rental license program in place. He thinks that should come before the ADUs. Adding ADUs without a rental license program will be an issue. We need to keep the affordable housing inventory that we have. When those homes are sold to corporations, the only motive is profit. They will charge as much as they can. He said Minneapolis thought this would solve their affordable housing issue. It did not meet their expectations, at all. He is concerned about changing the character in Arden Hills. He encouraged Council not to rush and to take the time to get this right. Other communities took two years. We need to think through all the options before doing anything. Staff put together a lot of good information, however, this is a starting point not the end. Location is also a factor. They should not be allowed in the front yard. Setbacks should mirror the requirements for any other home. Lot cover and impervious surface need to be considered, as well. The list of what can be done is long. He wants to encourage Council to take the time to think it through. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — APRIL 13, 2026 8 Councilmember Rousseau said she is hearing that Mayor Grant and Councilmember Holden want at least two years to study this and add a rental license program first. This is a lot to take on for Staff, as well. She is wondering if we should send it to the Planning Commission, assuming Staff has what they need, and bring the Planning Commission's ideas back to us. Councilmember Weber agreed. Mayor Grant said we can discuss the Planning Commission in the couple of minutes before we recess for the regular Council Meeting. Councilmember Holden said she never said she wanted to take two years. It is her opinion that we need a rental licensing program first, however long that takes. She thinks Council needs to discuss this. Does everyone want to allow detached and attached? Does everyone agree on size? She said this is a Council decision, not a Planning Commission decision. We need to create guidelines for the Planning Commission to consider. They aren't elected officials. It's important for us to have that oversight. Mayor Grant stated he didn't say two years, either. He said he wants a rental license program. Councilmember Weber pointed out that three of five Councilmembers support advancing this to the Planning Commission. He wants this moved on as quickly as possible. Mayor Grant would like to continue this conversation after the recess. Council recessed the Work Session at 6:55 pm. Council reconvened the Work Session at 9:29 pm. Mayor Grant reminded that before the recess, Council was discussing advancing this item to the Planning Commission. Councilmember Holden would like to clarify everyone's opinion on detached ADUs. We're talking about sending this to Planning Commission. Council needs to give them direction. Councilmember Weber said the discussion before the recess gave a lot of direction. We've been stating our preferences and Staff is taking notes. Mayor Grant asked Staff to summarize what has been said so far. Community Development Director Reilly said he heard requests for more information on how the utilities would function. There was clear direction that short-term rentals will not be allowed. He heard one ADU should be allowed per lot and to maintain the same lot coverage we have today. He heard "as allowed by right" from two people. He heard that one of the structures needs to be occupied by the owner. He heard general approval for attached ADUs but there is a difference in opinion on what detached could mean. He wanted to note that we already do not allow accessory structures in the front yard so that wouldn't be an option for this. Mayor Grant asked each Councilmember to state their preference. Councilmembers Weber, Rousseau and Monson said they are good with detached units. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — APRIL 13, 2026 9 Councilmember Monson said a detached ADU functions as an accessory structure. If someone already has a chicken coop and a shed, they wouldn't be allowed to have an ADU without removing one of those other structures because only two accessory structures are allowed. She asked if a detached garage, with an ADU on top would be one or two. Community Development Director Reilly said it would be one accessory structure. Councilmember Holden said a garage is only allowed to be so many square feet. If you add an ADU above it, you are changing the square footage of the garage. She thinks we should only allow attached ADUs because of the water and sewer hook ups. If we allow a detached ADU we almost can't go through the main house. She said someone could put an addition that is built toward the front yard. We would allow that. Community Development Director Reilly clarified that he heard Council saying they didn't want a detached unit being plunked into someone's front yard. An attached ADU addition that extends further into the front yard may be allowed depending on other factors. Mayor Grant said he does not want to allow detached. Discussion ensued about existing regulations that allow a resident to expand a home toward the front property line. This is no different from expanding the same home the same amount for the purpose of an ADU. However, if an ADU were constructed in this wayit would need a separate entrance on the side or the rear, not in the front. Community Development Director Reilly said he heard some say they wanted to ensure we are thoughtful in regards to the viewshed. We already have ordinances covering this and those ordinances will come into play. He said he heard concerns that just because someone has a big lot, it shouldn't mean they can build an ADU which is essentially a whole other house on the property. He asked if Councilmembers had a particular number in mind for a maximum ADU footprint or square footage. Discussion ensued regarding what Staff would recommend and what is typical. Council thinks 800 square feet is a fair number. Councilmember Holden said if someone builds this for an ageing parent and that parent passes, what's to stop them from knocking down that wall and using that additional space. Community Development Director Reilly said the homeowner would have to come in for a remodeling permit. We can make a provision that it can't be converted back. Councilmember Weber would like to see a little more information on the square footage. He wouldn't want to go too low that a two -bedroom ADU wouldn't be possible. He said 800 fees tight to him and 900 feels better. Councilmember Holden said TCAAP has recommendations of 750 square feet in some places. Those were supposed to be for families. She is happy with 800 square foot maximum. Community Development Director Reilly said some smaller communities use a percentage of the home's gross living area or a certain square footage. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — APRIL 13, 2026 10 Councilmember Weber said Arden Hills, in general, has large lots for single family homes but the homes on those large lots aren't necessarily large homes. Basing the ADU size on existing square footage is limiting. Allowing a 950 square foot ADU in the back yard on those large lots may be appropriate. Councilmember Holden said we keep referring to AARP. They say 800 square feet. They have done studies. Mayor Grant asked if Council could agree to set it at 800 square feet before it goes to Planning Commission. Council agreed on 800 square feet. Community Development Director Reilly said parking needs to be discussed. He disagreed with an earlier comment. He believes it is more likely that people with lower incomes will have a car. He thinks at least one should be required. Especially considering there is no public transit here. That may require some reconfiguring of the maximum number of operable vehicles allowed on the lot and where they need to be stored. Councilmember Rousseau would be interested in exploring this on a case -by -case basis. Councilmember Monson is okay doing it on a case -by -case basis but she would prefer not to require it. That would involve taking another look at on -street parking. Community Development Director Reilly said the final thing he gathered is a strong interest in a rental licensing program. Mayor Grant said Council also requested that Staff look into what surrounding cities are doing for ADUs. Councilmember Rousseau said as part of the strategic planning road mapping talked about rental properties. Can we tie in the licensing discussion? Could we have something in place by the end of the year? City Administrator Jagoe said she didn't know if we would have something in place but we could have the discussion. Councilmember Monson would like to see Staff present the rental licensing with a recommendation up front, based on what others are doing, so we aren't starting from scratch. City Administrator Jagoe asked if Council reached a consensus about if an ADU could be sold separately from the primary residence. Council agreed that an ADU shall not be sold separately. The owner owns both structures. Community Development Director Reilly said he would like to have a conversation about corporate ownership of rental properties, in general. He thought that could be addressed in the future. There are efforts at the federal and state level to address corporately owned rentals. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — APRIL 13, 2026 11 Councilmember Rousseau said when we have that conversation, she wants to see what the other surrounding cities are doing. Councilmember Holden asked if we can get the information on who owns property and set limits? She said just look down County Road D, not to mention the group homes. Corporations are starting to buy stuff and turn them into group homes. C. Public Works CIP Equipment Discussion Not Discussed. D. Volunteer Recognition Policy Not Discussed. E. El. Human Rights Commission And E2 Immigration Enforcement Discussion (Item 3F1 and F2 on published agenda) Not Discussed. F. Code of Conduct (Item 3G on published agenda) Not Discussed. G. Rice Creek Commons/TCAAP Discussion (Item 3H on published agenda) Not Discussed. H. Agenda Planning (Item 31 on published agenda) Not Discussed. 4. COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS Councilmember Rousseau wanted to discuss the comment on group homes. She said the Brooklyn Park/Champlin area are getting a lot of police calls due to the group homes. She doesn't see the same pattern with our police. She doesn't have an understanding about how many we have in the community. She doesn't know if it's impacting the number of police calls we have. It would be nice to know more about that. Councilmember Holden said the people crawl out the windows with guns so the police have to come and try to find them. That has happened multiple times. Councilmember Rousseau said we get a report from the sheriff regarding unsheltered people. She wondered if the sheriff is tracking the calls related to group homes. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — APRIL 13, 2026 12 Councilmember Holden said legally we aren't supposed to know they're group homes. They weren't taking their garbage cans in. Cars were parked all over. She knocked on the door. She was told they were so-and-so company and it was none of her business. Councilmember Monson said it is permitted through the state, but we should still be able to enforce our ordinances. Councilmember Holden said you can, but the people who work and live there aren't interested. ADJOURN Mayor Grant adjourned the City Council Work Session at 10:00 p.m. Jen Estling Deputy Clerk David Grant Mayor Approved: May 11, 2026 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 13, 2026 7:00 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor David Grant called to order the regular City Council meeting at 7:00 p.m. Present: Mayor David Grant, Councilmembers Brenda Holden, Tena Monson, Emily Rousseau and Kurt Weber Absent: None Also present: City Administrator Jessica Jagoe; Public Works Director/City Engineer David Swearingen; Finance Director Joua Yang; Community Development Director Jake Reilly; and Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk Julie Hanson PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Councilmember Holden requested Consent Agenda Item D be pulled for discussion as Item 9A. Councilmember Rousseau requested Consent Agenda Item E be pulled for discussion as Item 9B. Councilmember Rousseau requested Consent Agenda Item M be pulled for discussion as Item 9C. Mayor Grant asked why Councilmember Rousseau was pulling these items from the Consent Agenda. Councilmember Rousseau explained she would like these items read aloud for the record. Mayor Grant indicated he would be reading these items as part of the Consent Agenda. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — APRIL 13, 2026 2 Councilmember Rousseau commented she would then withdraw here request to remove Items E and M from the Consent Agenda. Councilmember Monson questioned if Councilmembers could pull items from the Consent Agenda at the time the Consent Agenda was being considered. City Administrator Jagoe reported after speaking with the City Attorney, she confirmed an item could be pulled from the Consent Agenda up until a motion was on the floor. Councilmember Monson thanked staff for providing clarity on this this procedural matter. MOTION: Councilmember Monson moved and Councilmember Weber seconded a motion to approve the meeting agenda as amended. The motion carried (5-0). 2. TCAAP/RICE CREEK COMMONS UPDATE City Administrator Jagoe stated the Joint Development Authority met on March loth. Agenda items included consideration of TRC Amendment Requests, review of the 2025 Annual Report, and 2026 Road Map. In follow-up from the February meeting, Ramsey County along with its consultant Kimley Horn continued the review of two TRC Amendment requests with the JDA. The first TRC Amendment was to reduce the width of the multi -use trails in the TRC from 12 feet to 10 feet and the second pertains to the required spacing for street lighting along Rice Creek Boulevard. The TRC states that street lights shall be placed at an average of forty feet on center. Kimley Horn reviewed their photometric layouts which were at spacing as required by the TRC and as recommended per MnDOT Roadway Lighting Design Manual. Following this presentation, the JDA approved a motion to have JDA staff bring forward the two TRC Amendments to the City and County for consideration. The second item on the agenda as required by the Joint Powers Agreement, the JDA Administrative Director reviewed the JDA Annual Report for 2025. The report included development progress highlights such as the Outlot A groundbreaking and the final plat approval of the California parcel which allows for advancement of public infrastructure construction as well as a number of clean energy and sustainability updates like adoption of the Sustainability Design Guidelines, pursuing LEED for Communities certification, and the JDA hosting the first webinar series in November on sustainability and clean energy goals. The next meeting of the JDA scheduled for April 61h was canceled. For the advisory committees there were several meetings. First, the JDA Advisory Committee met on March 13th where JDA staff provided an overview of the analysis that is being completed for taking the hybrid developer approach and how that might work. Staff is identifying the critical parts of those upfront costs for each the City, County, and future development partners as well as examining what are those traditional development costs that developers expect such as infrastructure costs and development fees and how would those costs be divided between multiple developers under the hybrid approach. Through the analysis that staff is preparing the City and County will be able to examine the financial feasibility of a single developer versus the multiple developer approach and where those risks are mitigated. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — APRIL 13, 2026 3 The Advisory Committee met again on March 26th to discuss the opportunities and challenges of the Hybrid Developer approach. Staff reviewed with the Advisory Committee members the Request for Information responses that the JDA received last December. City and County staff are working to determine how sitewide infrastructure and amenities would be funded and paid for under this approach. Staff updated the advisory committee that under this approach the site would be divided into development areas and development partners would be sought through competitive solicitations for each area. JDA staff is still reviewing timing of contracting with a real estate development consultant to advise on the establishment of development areas, phasing of development, real estate market conditions, and other factors. The JDA Advisory Committee meeting scheduled for April 1 Oth was canceled. The Energy Advisory Committee met on April 8th. Ramsey County staff along with their consultant from LHB shared with the committee updates on sustainability and clean energy - related topics. Some of the key updates include: • The Rice Creek Commons project received LEED for Communities precertification at the Platinum level, and the project team will work toward full certification later this year. • Planning and research for a future geothermal district energy system is ongoing — including work by Ever -Green Energy and Darcy Solutions which is funded by the Minnesota Department of Commerce Geothermal Planning Grant. • Staff provided updates on a few different Xcel Energy items including utility coordination associated with the Rice Creek Boulevard project and Xcel's forthcoming Thermal Energy Network pilot project. • An update was provided on solar tax incentives — though the tax credits will be phased out sooner than originally planned, there are still ways to take advantage of them for the next year and a half. Lastly, the May 41h JDA meeting has been rescheduled to Wednesday, April 29th. Councilmember Holden asked if the County had provided the City with a copy of the PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) report. City Administrator Jagoe explained the City had not received a copy of this report to date and noted she would follow up with the County regarding this matter. Councilmember Holden inquired how much water Micro Control would be utilizing at their facility. City Administrator Jagoe commented this was not something that was requested from Micro Control as part of the land use development review process but noted she would follow up with the building department regarding this topic. Councilmember Holden requested further information on how TCAAP was being laid out since changes have been made to the plans. City Administrator Jagoe stated she could bring this information forward for the Council to review. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — APRIL 13, 2026 4 3. PUBLIC INQUIRIESANFORMATIONAL Kristine Poelzer, 1870 Indian Place, encouraged the City to educate the public regarding ADUs or accessory dwelling units. She did not want lack of facts to deter residents from pursuing ADU's. She thanked Community Development Director Reilly for his depth of knowledge and for sharing his expertise with the community. She spoke to the rising costs of purchasing a home and discussed how ADUs assist homeowners with creating multi -generational housing. She suggested the City hold an open house regarding ADUs in order to educate the public and to gather input from residents. 4. RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIES None. 5. PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS None. 6. STAFF COMMENTS None. 7. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. March 9, 2026, City Council Work Session B. March 9, 2026, Regular City Council MOTION: Councilmember Monson moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a motion to approve the March 9, 2026, City Council Work Session minutes as presented and the March 9, 2026, Regular City Council meeting minutes as amended. The motion carried (5-0). 8. CONSENT CALENDAR Mayor Grant read in full for the record Items 8E and 8M. A. Motion to Approve Consent Agenda Item - Claims and Payroll B. Motion to Approve Resolution 2026-014 Authorizing the Submission of the 2026- 2028 Water Efficiency Grant Program Application to the Met Council C. Motion to Approve Resolution 2026-015 Authorizing the Waiver of Utility System Delinquency Penalties Assessed During Quarter 4 2025 and Quarter 12026 D. Motion to Approve ReseltAien 2026 016 Relating to Mew Less May for- Arden Hills Residents .,,-..7 Businesses E. Motion to Approve Proclamation Recognizing April as Fair Housing Month F. Motion to Authorize Execution of Ramsey County Public Entity Innovation Grant (PEIG) Agreement for Recycling Cart Purchase G. Motion to Approve Resolution 2026-017 Accepting Donation from the Arden Hills Foundation ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — APRIL 13, 2026 5 H. Motion to Approve 2026 Contract with the Minnesota Department of Corrections Institution Community Work Crew (ICWC) Program I. 2026 PMP Street and Utility Improvements Project • Motion to Approve Resolution 2026-018 Awarding Contract to Bituminous Roadways, Inc. • Motion to Approve Professional Services Agreement for Materials Testing with Braun Intertec • Motion to Accept Karth Lake Improvement District Board Resolution dated April 7, 2026 J. Motion to Authorize Recruitment of Temporary Public Works Maintenance Worker K. Motion to Approve Resolution 2026-019 — Request to Waive Landscaping Escrow — Lake Johanna Fire Department Planning Case 24-009 L. Motion to Approve Resolution 2026-020 Authorizing Submittal of Livable Communities Grant Application M. Motion to Approve Resolution 2026-021 Adopting a City of Arden Hills Fair Housing Policy Statement N. Motion to Acknowledge Letter from Fishing for Life Related to the Previously Approved Exempt Permit to Conduct a Raffle and a Corrected Event Date of April 18, 2026 MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Weber seconded a motion to approve the Consent Calendar as amended and to authorize execution of all necessary documents contained therein. The motion carried iLgh 9. PULLED CONSENT ITEMS A. Motion to Approve Resolution 2026-016 Relating to Mow Less May for Arden Hills Residents and Businesses Councilmember Holden stated last year was a significant year as the City received a great deal of rain. She asked that staff speak to the timeline on when yards should be mowed in Arden Hills. City Administrator Jagoe explained if there are properties where residents had concerns regarding the length of the grass, staff should be contacted or residents should visit the City's website and submit a request tracker. She reported residents would have from June 1 to June 7 to mow their grass. After this time, properties would be inspected and letters would be sent from the City. Councilmember Holden stated for the record properties may not be mowed until June 25 given the timeline that was required to send letters and proper notice to homeowners. Councilmember Weber commented he understood this may be a concern for some properties in the city, but he believed it was important for residents to mow less in May. He then read a statement in full for the record that spoke to the benefits of Mow Less May, which spoke to the benefit of protecting native bees and other pollinators in the community. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — APRIL 13, 2026 6 Councilmember Holden indicated she believed this was an important program, but she wanted residents to understand the timeline for mowing, for the properties that chose not to comply. Councilmember Rousseau recommended this item move forward. Mayor Grant stated for those new to Arden Hills, this may be a new program, but this was a program the City has been following for quite some time. He believed it was important to acknowledge why the City was following this program and why grass may not be mowed very often in May. MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Rousseau seconded a motion to adopt Resolution 2026-016, Relating to Mow Less May for Arden Hills Residents and Businesses. The motion carried (5-0). 10. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. 2026 PMP Street and Utility Improvements Project Draft Special Assessment Roll Brad Fisher, Bolton & Menk, stated on February 9, 2026, the City Council adopted Resolution 2026-006 Approving the Plans and Specifications and Ordering the Advertisement for Bids for the 2026 PMP Street & Utility Improvement Project, which includes the Arden Manor Park Hardcourt Improvements and the Arden Oaks Park ADA Improvements. Bids were solicited and opened on March 4, 2026. A portion of the costs for the 2026 PMP Street & Utility Improvement Project is proposed to be assessed against the benefitting properties according to the City's Assessment Policy. In order to assess these costs, the City must follow the process outlined in State Statute 429. On March 9, 2026, after the bids were opened, the City Council adopted Resolution 2026-010 Declaring Costs to be Assessed and set today as the date for the assessment hearing. A public hearing prior to adopting the assessments is a requirement of State Statute 429. Mr. Fisher explained the project is proposed to be assessed consistent with the City's Assessment Policy and past practices, which states that 50% of the costs for roadway improvements will be assessed in residential areas, 70% in industrial areas, and the remaining portion financed by City funds. The current assessment policy states that the typical overhead rate for a public improvement project is 37% of the construction costs. Staff believes this percentage is higher than necessary and recommends that approximately 27% of the construction costs be used as overhead when calculating the assessment rates. Staff has made this recommendation on the past PMPs since 2021. The Council must establish the interest rate at tonight's Council Meeting. Many cities set their interest rate for assessments at two (2) percentage points over the bond interest rate. The City's assessment policy states that the interest rate used for the assessment shall be designated at the prime rate plus two (2) percentage points. For the past four PMPs, the assessment interest rates were set at two (2) percentage points over the assumed bond interest rates, which were based on current market conditions at the time, the City's AAA bond rating, plus 15 basis points. Mr. Fisher reported the City's current assumed bond interest rate is 3.70% and the prime rate is 6.75%. Staff would recommend following the City's assessment policy and setting the assessment rate at 5.70%. The total project costs were analyzed for the assessable cost. The calculation of the amount to be assessed as approved by Council Resolution 2026-010 is shown below. The assessments related to the project are calculated in accordance with the City's Assessment policy, ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — APRIL 13, 2026 7 is 50% of the street project cost for residential properties, 70% for industrial properties and dependent on the type of pavement rehabilitation. Mr. Fisher stated the Council should hold the Assessment Hearing. After the Assessment Hearing is closed and as part of New Business, Council should consider adopting Resolution 2026-023 Adopting the Assessment Roll for the 2026 PMP Street & Utility Improvement Project with any changes they deem appropriate. If questions or concerns are received at the assessment hearing that require further investigation, staff recommends that Council amend the proposed assessment roll to remove the property or properties, then approve the Resolution as amended. This will allow staff time to research questions and objections raised at the hearing before bringing discussion back at a later Council meeting. Following the assessment hearing, also under new business, staff will be recommending award of the contract to Bituminous Roadways, Inc. as the lowest responsible bidder. Councilmember Rousseau asked if Gateway Fiber would be installed in coordination with this proj ect. Mr. Fisher explained it was his understanding there was interest but noted a franchise agreement would have to be put in place. Councilmember Weber noted he spoke with the attorney at North Suburban Cable Commission and he learned requiring franchises was cooling interest in fiber installation. Councilmember Rousseau inquired if residents could coordinate with the contractor to have their driveways redone. Mr. Fisher reported the City would not be taking on the coordination efforts, but noted residents could speak with the contractor on their own. He explained some contractors were willing to take on this private work and some were not. Councilmember Rousseau asked when neighbors would be provided with further information on the project timeline. Mr. Fisher anticipated this would occur in May when the City would be hosting a neighborhood open house for this project. Councilmember Rousseau questioned who residents could contact if they had concerns regarding the project. Mr. Fisher encouraged residents to contact Bolton & Menk with construction related questions. He provided further information on the notices that would be provided to residents throughout the construction project as roadway and utility improvements occur. Mayor Grant asked if the project would use surmountable or barrier curbing. Mr. Fisher explained the project curbing would vary noting the contractor would match the curbing that was in place for the spot curb replacement. Mayor Grant inquired if the bituminous mix was different between the base and wear courses. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — APRIL 13, 2026 8 Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen reported the same mix would be used throughout the project area. Councilmember Weber asked if the Karth Lake work was included in the assessment roll. Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen explained this work was approved on the Consent Agenda. Councilmember Weber questioned if the City had a policy in place specific to moratoriums when it comes to the installation of utilities on new roadways and roadway excavation. Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen stated the City manages this through the right of way permitting process noting the City does not like to cut into new roadways for at least five years. However, he noted requests are reviewed on a case by case basis. Councilmember Holden requested staff speak to the appeals process. Mr. Fisher explained all appeals would have to be submitted to the City in writing by the end of this hearing. Councilmember Holden encouraged staff to speak with the contractor in order to have a sandwich board that communicated what work would be completed each day, noting this worked well during the Crystal neighborhood street improvement project. She asked what work would have to be done in May, noting she did not want the contractor to be disrupting graduation parties or other family events. Mr. Fisher explained utility work had to be done within Ramsey County right of way before the street project could commence. He encouraged residents that would be hosting a graduation party this spring to reach out to Bolton & Menk in order to make him aware of the date so he can work with the contractor to ensure the area was cleaned up as much as possible and accessible on the date of the event. Councilmember Monson requested further information on how the Karth Lake District meeting went. Councilmember Weber reported the low bidder did not have the lowest bid for the Karth Lake work. He indicated this led the Karth Lake board to hold a meeting to reassess whether or not to move forward. He stated the board did opt to move forward with the work but had concerns. He noted the group wanted the Council to consider a more favorable split, but it was his understanding a 50/50 split has been done in the past. He commented one of the board members had the impression of one of the Councilmembers that because these individuals lived on a lake they were wealthy and could afford the additional expense. He reported this board member stated not all of the individuals that live on Karth Lake were wealthy and that some no longer worked and were retired. Councilmember Rousseau indicated she spoke with several residents that live on Karth Lake as well and noted this was not a recreational lake. She explained at best, residents on Karth Lake can put in a kayak. She noted there was a concern around flooding in Karth Lake given how the level ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — APRIL 13, 2026 9 of the lake rises and falls. She thanked the lake owners for paying for the pump and for mitigating the flood risk. Mayor Grant asked if the mailboxes would be relocated as necessary. Mr. Fisher stated mailboxes will be relocated if necessary. He commented given the scope of the work the majority of mailboxes will not need to be relocated. Mayor Grant requested staff provide the residents with information on how trash and recycling will be managed throughout the street improvement project. Mr. Fisher reported residents are to put their trash and recycling out as normal and the contractor will ensure to work the trash haulers have access. Mayor Grant opened the public hearing at 8:16 p.m. With no one coming forward to speak, Mayor Grant closed the public hearing at 8:17 p.m. B. Quarterly Special Assessments for Delinquent Utilities Finance Director Yang stated water customers whose accounts are 90 days past due were informed that the City intends to certify delinquent charges to Ramsey County to be collected with property taxes. These customers have the right to a hearing in front of the City Council to discuss this matter prior to certification. Mayor Grant opened the public hearing at 8:18 p.m. With no one coming forward to speak, Mayor Grant closed the public hearing at 8:18 p.m. 11. NEW BUSINESS A. Resolution 2026-023 Adopting Special Assessment Roll — 2026 PMP Street and Utility Improvement Project Public Works/City Engineer Swearingen stated this item was presented to the Council under Agenda Item 10A. MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Rousseau seconded a motion to adopt Resolution 2026-023 — Adopting Assessment Roll for the 2026 PMP Street & Utility Improvement Proiect with an interest rate of 5.7%. Councilmember Weber asked if the proposed interest rate was staff s recommendation. Finance Director Yang reported staff sets the interest rate at 2% above prime and prime was currently 3.7%. The motion carried (5-0). ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — APRIL 13, 2026 10 B. Resolution 2026-022 Adopting and Confirming Quarterly Special Assessments for Delinquent Utilities Finance Director Yang stated this item was presented to the Council under Agenda Item IOB. MOTION: Councilmember Monson moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a motion to adopt Resolution 2026-022 — Certifying Delinquent Utilities to Ramsey County. The motion carried (5-0). C. Resolution 2026-024 Adopting the Arden Hills Park System Plan Anna Springer, Bolton & Menk, stated a Park System Plan is a long-range planning document that provides a comprehensive inventory and needs assessment of a community's parks, trails, and recreational facilities. The Plan is intended to guide decision -making, capital investment, and system priorities over the next ten years to ensure that the City's park system continues to meet the evolving needs of residents. On April 14, 2025, the City Council approved a professional services agreement with Bolton & Menk to complete the Park System Plan. Ms. Springer explained the project began in May 2025 and has included a structured planning process consisting of three Steering Committee meetings, two community engagement events, one community open house, and one online community survey. The Park System Plan builds upon the City's previous Parks, Trails and Open Space Plan, adopted in 2002, which no longer reflects current park system conditions. The updated Plan evaluates existing park assets, amenities, and service levels, and identifies gaps, priorities, and opportunities for improvement based on community input, demographic trends, and best practices in park system planning. Ms. Springer reported community engagement was a central component of the planning process. Input gathered through multiple outreach efforts helped identify community priorities and areas of need, ensuring that the Plan reflects the values and expectations of Arden Hills residents. The draft Park System Plan was presented to the City Council at a Work Session on December 8, 2025. At that meeting, Anna Springer from Bolton & Menk presented an overview of the findings to date, reviewed initial recommendations, and outlined the next steps in the planning process. At this meeting, Anna will provide a brief overview of the final Park System Plan. The final Park System Plan was presented to the Parks, Trails, and Recreation Committee (PTRC) on March 24, 2026. The Committee reviewed the Plan and recommended that the City Council adopt the Park System Plan. The Park System Plan is intended to serve as a guiding document for the City Council, PTRC, and staff as they plan for future investments in parks, trails, and recreational facilities. Adoption of the Plan positions the City to make informed, strategic decisions that support long-term sustainability and community benefit. Councilmember Monson stated she fully supported the City having this document in place. She discussed how this document would assist the Council by providing a wholistic approach for improvements for every City park going forward. She indicated she also liked the fact the City would have a natural resources master plan in place. She commented on how this document would also assist the Council with planning for parks in Rice Creek Commons. She commented it appears the City has the proper number of parks and trails per resident, but does not have enough staffing and budget. She requested comment from staff on this matter. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — APRIL 13, 2026 11 Ms. Springer explained the budgetary component was a reflection of the City having a lot of amenities which required more funding to maintain. She reported the City had six FTE's to manage the City's parks, but noted these individuals were assigned to other tasks as well. She discussed how the comments received from the public were that the City's parks were clean and well maintained, which was a good reflection on the City and its staff members. Councilmember Holden stated the national report that was used as a comparison had data from California and Florida and in these states the parks had to be maintained for twelve months instead of six months, which may be why the City's staffing numbers appeared to be off. Ms. Springer commented this was a good consideration. She stated in general communities in Minnesota have more parks than other areas of the country. Councilmember Holden reported she was proud of the results from the study noting the City had more excellent and outstanding ratings than poor. She was proud of how the City was working to maintain the parks. Councilmember Rousseau stated she loved living in Minnesota because this State had high quality park systems. She appreciated walking in the City's parks. She noted she was pleased with the park system master plan that had been created and she supported the plan being adopted. She asked what the next steps for the City would be once the plan was adopted. Ms. Springer explained there were some projects that were queued up for the next several years and it would be great for the City to continue with the momentum that has been created. She reported the Council would have to consider when to bring the community back in for specific input on a specific park project for a mini master plan. She suggested the PTRC continue to review the implementation chapter going forward. Mayor Grant thanked everyone who had input on this document, which included staff, the Council, PTRC and public. He asked if the seasonal employees were included in the 6.3 number. Ms. Springer stated this does include the seasonal employees. Mayor Grant questioned how many of the City's public works employees were included in the 6.3 number. Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen reported every employee that works at the City that has time dedicated to parks was included in this number. Mayor Grant inquired if the ICWC crew was included in the number. Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen explained the ICWC crew was not included in this number. Mayor Grant supported the City looking at areas within the parks where pickleball courts could be added. He understood the community was also looking for a splash pad and noted this amenity may fit best within TCAAP. He appreciated how the City had worked to find synergies on park projects with developers and the County and hoped this could continue going forward. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — APRIL 13, 2026 12 Councilmember Monson asked if there would be water access to Round Lake in the future. Councilmember Weber stated this was part of the long term plan through fish and wildlife. He commented on how this document was an inventory of what the City has and what the City needs. He supported the City seeking funding in order to assist with completing projects in the future. It was his hope this document would be viewed as an indication of desire and obligation when it comes to park improvements. He questioned what fund was used to cover the expense for park improvements. Finance Director Yang reported the PIR Fund covers the cost for park improvement projects. Councilmember Weber stated given the concerns facing the PIR Fund he did not believe the City would be able to implement the proposed park improvements. He supported the City looking at its low employee counts and low revenue generation from parks. He reported the only way for the City to implement this plan would be to improve the health of the PIR Fund. Councilmember Rousseau explained some cities have a director parks and recreation and Arden Hills has parks managed by the Public Works Director. She questioned if the City had to create a new line item for parks. Finance Director Yang indicated the City has a separate parks fund and these funds could be segregated for more visibility from the PIR Fund. Councilmember Weber stated he loves this document and thanked all of the individuals that worked on this plan. Councilmember Holden appreciated how this plan piggybacked on the previous plan the City had in place. She reported she did not view this plan as an obligation but rather viewed it as a living document on how to proceed with projects but noted the document could be reviewed and amended on a yearly basis noting the needs in the community may change. MOTION: Councilmember Monson moved and Councilmember Rousseau seconded a motion to adopt Resolution 2026-024, Adopting the Arden Hills Park System Plan. Mayor Grant commented he appreciated the positive review of the City's parks and the positive feedback that was received from residents on the City's parks. Councilmember Holden recommended this plan be posted on the City website. Councilmember Monson stated she would also like to see the park by park map matching the table included on the website. The motion carried (5-0 12. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None. 13. COUNCIL COMMENTS ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — APRIL 13, 2026 13 Councilmember Rousseau thanked staff member Matt Johnson for his efforts on the Spring egg hunt. Councilmember Rousseau suggested the Council discuss the ice plunge at a future work session. Councilmember Rousseau reported the overnight parking citations were becoming a concern for residents, noting warnings are no longer being offered. She asked if the proactive visits into the community counted on the City's calls for service. City Administrator Jagoe reported the proactive visits do not count on the City's calls for service. Mayor Grant indicated he had this same concern and noted Ramsey County was patrolling the City's streets between 2:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. and were writing tickets, but an officer was not dispatched for a chargeable call for service. Councilmember Rousseau commented she would like to know why the Ramsey County Sheriff's Office has been so focused on handing out parking tickets in recent weeks. City Administrator Jagoe explained she was uncertain why there was an uptick but noted she could speak with the Sheriff's Department and could report back to the City Council. Councilmember Rousseau stated she would like to know what the cost for the parking citations was and if the City received a portion of the proceeds. Councilmember Rousseau reported the City tree sale was underway at this time and information regarding the sale was available on the City's website. Councilmember Weber stated the Planning Commission met last week and held a lengthy discussion on the City's inclusionary housing policy and recommended the AMI table be amended. He appreciated all of the research the group did prior to the meeting. Councilmember Holden reported AHATS was having a Stewardship Clean Up Day on April 24 from 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. Councilmember Holden thanked staff for their efforts on the Spring egg hunt. Councilmember Holden asked if staff had any information on the Ramsey County trail share. Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen commented he did not have an update for the Council at this time. Councilmember Monson reported she heard from residents regarding the parking citations as well. She indicated one resident suggested the ordinance be rewritten in order to allow residents to park on the street at certain times. She stated she would be happy to discuss this matter further at a future worksession meeting. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — APRIL 13, 2026 14 Councilmember Monson explained this year was Arden Hills 751h Anniversary and an event was being planned for July. She noted the planning committee was seeking business sponsors at this time. Mayor Grant stated last month the Council joined the Safe and Stable Communities Coalition. He commented on how this group was requesting $10 million be set aside by the State to assist communities and businesses that have been impacted by ICE actions. He asked if the Council supported this action. The Council offered their support. Mayor Grant reported he was elected Chair of the Ramsey County 911 Dispatch Policy Committee. Mayor Grant explained at the last meeting the Council requested a copy of Roberts Rules of Order and asked if staff had provided this information. City Administrator Jagoe indicated she had given a copy to Mayor Grant as well as at the dais for the City Attorney. Councilmember Weber reported he had requested a copy of Roberts Rules of Order from the dais at the last City Council meeting. Mayor Grant stated with respect to the parking citations, the City's ordinance states cars are not to be parked on street from 2:00 a.m. to 6:00 a.m. City Administrator Jagoe reported she would add the ice plunge to a future work session agenda and asked if the Council wanted to discuss the City's overnight parking ordinance at a future meeting. The Council supported adding this item to a future work session agenda. /3 0are111.74 MOTION: Mayor Grant moved and Councilmember Monson seconded a motion to adiourn. The motion carried (5-0). Mayor Grant adjourned the Regular City Council Meeting at 9:25 p.m. Julie Hanson City Clerk David Grant Mayor Approved: May 11, 2026 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION APRIL 27, 2026 5:30 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Grant called to order the City Council Work Session at 5:30 p.m. Present: Mayor David Grant; Councilmembers Brenda Holden, Tena Monson, Emily Rousseau and Kurt Weber Absent: None Also present: City Administrator Jessica Jagoe, Public Works Director/City Engineer David Swearingen, Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk Julie Hanson, Community Development Director Jake Reilly, Public Works Superintendent Jeff Frid and Parks and Recreation Manager Jess Skalicky 1. PUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL Ben Lindau, 3288 Katie Lane, stated he is a Planning Commissioner but is speaking tonight as an Arden Hills Resident. He wants to address the Affordable Housing item on the Regular City Council Meeting agenda. He can't attend the regular meeting due to a coaching conflict. He knows the discussion will encompass what affordability means and how we can bring it to Arden Hills. He researched the topic a little. He said Shoreview has a similar market. They shared how they got there. The direction they went makes sense. 2. RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIES None. 3. AGENDA ITEMS A. TRC Amendments Discussion ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — APRIL 27, 2026 2 Eric Fosmo, from Kimley Horn is the Project Manager for the Rice Creek Commons Infrastructure project. John Mazzitello, Deputy Director of Public Works for Ramsey County is the Project Manager for the spine road. They introduced themselves. Mr. Fosmo said they will be presenting a code amendment to the Planning Commission at the end of the month, with it being heard at City Council in June. They are seeking feedback on the multi- use trail width in the TRC code. It currently specifies a minimum 12-foot trail width for any trail along the spine road and other roads in the development. The amendment will request a 10-foot width along Rice Creek Boulevard. He shared a graphic showing the specific area they are talking about. It proposes a trail along the outside of the right of way, allowing for significant green space, trees, landscaping or buffers between the road and the trail. There are a few reasons for this request. The Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) has allowance for up to 10-foot trails. If you have 10- foot trails with an appropriate green space boulevard, it doesn't require additional storm water treatment for that paved space. Councilmember Holden said Xcel Energy requested the trail be 12 feet. City Administrator Jagoe said City Staff checked with them and they said 10 feet was acceptable for them and have no comments to require 12-feet. Mr. Fosmo said the 12-foot trail would require additional storm water with additional space within the natural resources corridor to be dedicated to storm water for the public improvements. There is a cost to constructing that storm water and it is a loss of flexibility for future development. The Ramsey County standard for trails along their roadways is 8 feet, trails that are off -road trails have a 10-foot minimum width. The standard for Arden Hills, outside of Rice Creek Commons, is 8 feet. The proposed 10-foot width meets all county, state and federal standards for a multi -use trail. Councilmember Rousseau said there are no bike lanes. So bikers would ride on the roadway with traffic or pick a different trail. She asked how this fits in with Arden Hills being a walkable city. Mr. Fosmo said they aren't proposing to reduce the length of any sidewalks or trails. It's still proposed as a multi -use trail on both sides of Rice Creek Boulevard. It still allows for bikes and pedestrians to utilize the trail at the same time in both directions, on both sides of the road. The shoulder is wide enough to allow for commuter bikes who prefer to be on the roadway. There won't be dedicated bike lanes but the 5-foot width is considered a bikeable shoulder. Councilmember Rousseau said this feels like we are prioritizing vehicles. Councilmember Holden asked where the bike lane will be. Mr. Fosmo on the shoulder or the multi -use trail. The rider can decide. Councilmember Holden said it will be dense up there. She isn't sure if a 5-foot shoulder on each side of the road is sufficient. Mr. Mazzitello said the intercommunity traffic is more likely to use the trails. The commuters who are moving through Rice Creek Commons will be more apt to use the shoulder. Councilmember Weber asked what the proposed speed is on Rice Creek Parkway. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — APRIL 27, 2026 3 Mr. Fosmo said 35 mph. Councilmember Weber said he supported this at the Joint Development Authority (JDA) meeting and still does. If 10-foot trails are the norm, he thinks 10-foot trails on each side and 5-foot shoulders on each side is sufficient. Councilmember Rousseau asked if we ever anticipate having buses. Mr. Fosmo said the corridor is wide enough to accommodate a future transit line. We would anticipate bus traffic to be part of development. There are no bus stops delineated at this time but the corridor and green space are wide enough to construct future bus stops. Councilmember Rousseau asked if they have had any outreach to the biking community to get their opinion. Mr. Mazzitello said the biking community are very vocal about all Ramsey County projects. What they say is they want to be able to commute through the development without going through subdivisions. They are interested in having a nice through -route for commuter bikes. Councilmember Rousseau asked if those comments could be shared. Mr. Mazzitello said the comments are scattered throughout their work. Before construction and during public engagement they will have that conversation. Councilmember Monson said there was a lot of discussion at the JDA. She thinks it feels like we are taking something away by going from 12 feet to 10 feet. She struggled with that a little. What convinced her is that it's on both sides of the road. She also hopes it will help avoid delays for watershed permitting. She liked that it won't restrict other parts of development. The current trails are 8 feet and they're fine. This is better. Another point made at the JDA is a 10-foot trail can be plowed in a single pass vs. a 12-foot trail that would either be plowed at 10 feet or Public Works would have to plow it twice. Mayor Grant said RCWD originally wanted 12 feet. If they are okay with it being 10 feet, he is okay with that. Councilmember Holden said we would have had a slightly larger stormwater pond with a 12-foot trail vs. a 10-foot trail. She asked if that was correct. Mr. Fosmo said all of the water will still flow to storm water treatment. It's the way the district calculates their credits. Anytime water runs off of something; paved trails, buildings, etc., the RCWD says treatment must be provided. Having 12-foot trails means that has to be accounted for in the calculation, which takes up space within the development. Councilmember Holden said we have a lot of things that were made for the 100-year storm. We could see multiple 100-year storms. She asked if the way they calculate the volume in the stormwater ponds has changed at all. Mr. Fosmo said those are two separate things. How you calculate for the flood event accounts for everything. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — APRIL 27, 2026 4 Councilmember Holden said we've had flooding over and over again. Her question is have they increased the volume so we don't have full or overflowing stormwater ponds. Mr. Mazzitello said about 10 years ago there was a study on storm frequencies and intensities. They increased the rainfall amounts that we use to calculate the storage volumes of the ponds. Mayor Grant said we have general consensus on 10-feet trails. He asked they present the other item. Mr. Fosmo concluded that the proposed amended trail width language is in the agenda packet. He noted the amended language is only requesting this along the spine road. Mr. Fosmo said the second topic is street lighting along Rice Creek Boulevard. The current TRC code requires streetlights to be placed every 40 feet. The amendment request is to allow for more context appropriate street light spacing. Essentially it references the MnDOT roadway lighting design standards as the basis for placing streetlights. He said 40-foot spacing for streetlights is far denser than any other example they could find. It is cost prohibitive for construction, as well as long-term maintenance for the City. Requiring 40-foot spacing would result in excess light on the roadway. The 40-foot spacing on the roadway would not light the trail sufficiently, if that was the intent. Mr. Fosmo said the City contracts the maintenance of streetlights with Xcel Energy. The City's selected type is based on what is available through Xcel. Councilmember Rousseau asked if the streetlights will face downward. Mr. Fosmo confirmed. He said the design intent is a downcast fixture. Mr. Mazzitello said a traditional cobra head design has a bulb, this fixture has a box that is directed downward. Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen said the City's lighting palette includes the dark sky element. These will meet that. Councilmember Holden said when the 40-foot spacing was put in place, there were different lightbulbs. The decision was based on safety of residents using the trail. The lighting has changed so significantly, it doesn't matter if we go to 50 feet now. Mr. Fosmo said if MnDOT roadway lighting standards are applied, the lighting along the streets would need to be spaced at 200 feet and if we wanted to do pedestrian lighting, they would be spaced at 50 feet. The standard recommended roadway illuminance would be 1 foot candle. The 40-foot spacing would be 7.3 foot candle lighting. When you set up streetlighting for a roadway, you want the intersections better lit than the straight sections with no intersections. At 40-foot spacing, the straight aways will be better lit when intersections are wider than 40-feet and you can't maintain that distance between light poles. That makes activities less safe along those roadways and at those intersections. Councilmember Holden asked who is responsible for maintaining the green space and boulevard. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — APRIL 27, 2026 5 Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen said the City will maintain it. Councilmember Rousseau asked if that includes the roundabouts. Discussion ensued that maintenance of the center median and center of roundabouts are still up for debate. That will be part of the cooperative agreement. Conduits will be stubbed in during construction, for future irrigation. Mr. Fosmo provided a graphic depicting what lighting will look like with the proposed amended code. Councilmember Holden asked if there would be enough lighting for people to safely cross a roundabout safely at night. Mr. Fosmo confirmed. Pedestrian lighting is different. The MnDOT roadway design lighting standard is the recommended minimum illuminance of 2 foot candle. The standard for a pedestrian zone is greater than the minimum lighting for a roadway. We can achieve that with 50-foot spacing for the pedestrian lighting on trails. Pedestrian light poles are shorter in height and would still be downward pointing. Councilmember Holden said she wants it to be safe for whoever is traveling the road or trails. Metropolitan Council is in the hole for the next 10 years. She doesn't know how there will be money for a bus line here. Mr. Mazzitello said we can't control what Met Council does. This is designed to be transit -ready and capable of handling bus stop stations. Councilmember Monson said the TRC amendment is for streetlighting. We aren't amending the pedestrian lighting. She said the proposal will include pedestrian lighting, but the TRC doesn't require it. Staff confirmed. Councilmember Weber said we would have to amend the TRC if the JDA decided to require it. Discussion ensued that the proposed the amendments won't say anything about requiring pedestrian lighting. This just identifies where lighting should be placed if it is included. Councilmember Monson said an additional TRC amendment should be considered to ensure that trail lighting be required. Mayor Grant said the previous example was talking about Rice Creek Parkway. It sounds like a discussion is needed on pedestrian lighting across the entirety of Rice Creek Commons walkways. He would like to ensure that the trail lighting is consistent everywhere. Councilmember Holden thought trail lighting is required on the sidewalks through the HOAs. Staff would have to look that up and get back to Council. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — APRIL 27, 2026 6 Mr. Mazzitello said the amendment request is for Rice Creek Boulevard. Councilmember Monson said if we are going through a TRC amendment process and trail lighting is not already required, we should bundle that requirement so it's just one amendment. Mayor Grant said that Council is being asked to recommend Planning Commission review. He believes they have the feedback they were seeking in regards to Rice Creek Parkway. Discussion ensued that the JDA may want to discuss trail lighting, in general. This amendment is timely because we're 80% into the design stage of Rice Creek Parkway. This needs to be decided now. Further discussion ensued that the reduction in streetlighting doesn't impact the trails. Council would like to have a discussion on trail lighting. Councilmember Holden said this was Ramsey County's project and we assumed they would want lighting on their trail. The HOAs and downtown include lighting. This may be a moot point. Councilmember Weber said the county has stated at the JDA meetings that the county doesn't typically light its trails. Mayor Grant said Rice Creek Commons is going to be a step above. He doesn't want it to look like a rural county road with lights every 250 feet. He said 40 feet is excessive. We want it to be lit and look community oriented. Mr. Mazzitello said the design speed of the road plays a factor. The slower the road, the closer the lights get. We will light this appropriately, according to the MnDOT manual it's just not going to be 40 feet. They aren't specifying a number. Mr. Fosmo said the MnDOT Roadway Lighting Design guide is for if a roadway is lit. Rural highways won't be lit. Those roadways only have lighting at intersections. The design standard we will apply is for fully lit corridors. Mayor Grant said his point is if they added 2 or 3 more on each side of that one -mile stretch, it presents to people that that this is special. Mr. Mazzitello said this is a county road but ultimately they will build what the JDA wants them to build. Councilmember Rousseau said there is a corridor where there is a lot trees, which is great, but she would probably walk in the street at night vs. that corridor where others couldn't see what is happening. She would recommend they look at the lighting in that area. She was expecting something more for this trail and is a little underwhelmed with what is happening here. Mr. Mazzitello clarified the images they are sharing are conceptual renderings, not final designs. Discussion ensued that St. Anthony Parkway was reviewed as a comparison, however the spacing on that road is 70 feet. The design manual will be used rather than picking a hard number. When the design speed and lighting requirements are evaluated, the number will be determined. The Planning Commission will be made aware of this so they won't be misled. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — APRIL 27, 2026 7 Council agreed this can be advanced to the Planning Commission. B. Public Works CIP Equipment Discussion Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen said this discussion will be about Public Works Capital equipment. He said Staff s approach for creating the CIP is to consider the frequency table, a scoring system and Public Works works with the Finance Director to fine tune what works with the budget. He said equipment and building improvements are within the same fund. We have to balance those needed improvements with keeping our equipment on a replacement cycle that ensures reliable equipment. Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen said the front-end loader options are outlined in the packet. We recommend that the city have a front-end loader. We also recommend that the city have a mini excavator with the capabilities proposed. Operations have changed to the point that the backhoe is not used as often because we can get the same production from a mini excavator. Attachment D proposes to eliminate the backhoe, upgrade the mini -excavator and replace the front- end loader. Discussion ensued that this would free up space at the Public Works shop. Mayor Grant asked if the backhoe that is proposed to be eliminated is in the replacement schedule. Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen said it is in the 2026-2030 budget for replacement in 2027 at $172,000. Mayor Grant asked the price of the front-end loader. Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen said the estimate is roughly $225,000 or less. We haven't received actual quotes yet. Mayor Grant said a snowplow or other attachments will cost extra. Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen confirmed. He said Attachment F shows White Bear Townships' recent purchase of the same size front end loader. Discussion ensued on the cost of the mini excavator. The CAT backhoe being proposed is one or two sizes larger than the Bobcat backhoe we currently have. The $130,000 covers what is being proposed for replacement. That includes two or three different buckets. Mayor Grant said they are adding $25,000 for the excavator and the front-end loader is less than what is previously at $225,000. By eliminating the backhoe at $172,000, we have the equipment we need and we're saving about $150,000. Plus we will free up one space in the maintenance facility. Staff confirmed. Councilmember Holden said the replacement for the loader is $300,000 but the project by list it's $275,000. Which is it? ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — APRIL 27, 2026 8 Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen said the total cost is $300,000 for the front end loader with the plow attachment. The $275,000 is the cost after applying the trade in value for the old equipment. Councilmember Weber asked for examples where a larger excavator is beneficial. Public Works Superintendent Frid said we currently use the mini -excavator primarily for storm sewer clear out, removing sediment, setting rip rap, catch basin rebuilding. We often need more reach to stay in the roadway or on the boulevard to reach the aprons. It would help immensely with storm sewer projects but a backhoe can be used for many more projects. In the winter you can go around with a forestry head attachment so it has auxiliary hydraulics. Councilmember Weber asked if we have experienced lack of reach and leaving things behind. Do we not have platforms? Public Works Superintendent Frid said not leaving it behind but we're only able to reach what we can with the current equipment. If we have to crawl down we could use mats but we don't own any. We would have to rent them, trailer them in, set them up and tear them down. He can only think of two instances when we rented mats. He wouldn't want to rely on that method. He would prefer to have a machine that can get the job done with less restoration and we can reach what we need to. It also gives us larger lifting capacity. Councilmember Weber appreciates seeing what the surrounding cities have for case loaders. He sees that at least one city say they contract out any loader work. Was that a consideration? Public Works Superintendent Frid said there are a handful of functions that Falcon Heights doesn't do. Their watermains are taken care of by St. Paul Water. They purchased used Ramsey County plow trucks and they bring those trucks to the county shop to get salt. The county still helps them with plowing. They don't operate the same as us. Councilmember Rousseau asked when we are paying for trails. Finance Director Yang said trails are scheduled for 2027. Councilmember Rousseau said we've had the case loader for 30 years. She appreciates that we would like to get a new one more frequently than that. That cost is $10,000 per year, spread over that time. She sees the City Hall roof is coming up. She asked if we are doing solar with any of that. She thought we should use greater discretion around those two. Councilmember Monson said she trusts Staff to make decisions on what equipment they need on a day-to-day basis. Her job is to trust and understand Staff but also know that we have to remain within budget. The replacement timeline is an approach to normalize the costs and ensuring we aren't letting equipment fall into disrepair to the point of creating emergencies when we need it. She remembers talking about giving a budget number that Staff will have to figure out how to work with that amount on an annual basis. That could be a valuable second layer. You could use the replacement table and slice and dice it to fit with the number. She would prefer that structure. These discussions feel heavy handed from the Council. Our job is to set policy to help Staff have the resources they need while balancing the budget. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — APRIL 27, 2026 9 Councilmember Holden said we have had incidents of receiving a lemon for a piece of equipment and had to replace it really soon. That would blow the whole budget and you can't get anything else. She asked how long it would take to get the case loader, once it's ordered. Public Works Superintendent Frid thought about six months. Councilmember Holden asked how much time is added to a project if we use the smaller loaders. Is it twice the time? Public Works Superintendent Frid said the issue he is running into is the backhoe we are looking to phase out is also up for replacement. That is the only other machine with a bucket, other than the loader. Councilmember Holden asked what we're doing on the backhoe for maintenance vs. repairs. Public Works Superintendent Frid said the backhoe has seen minimal use because operations shifted toward the mini excavator. For that to work, we need to replace the loader. Councilmember Holden asked why we are getting rid of the backhoe. Public Works Superintendent Frid said there are hydraulic hose issues. It's at the age where once you replace one hose, the next week something else will go. That's the issue with the loader, too. Mayor Grant said this is a piece of equipment we have talked about for a few years. Staff has come back with an idea. He thinks this is a better solution. Councilmember Holden asked if the equipment approved for 2026 has been ordered. Staff confirmed. Councilmember Holden asked if those orders were under budget or over budget. Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen thought we were under by almost $30,000. Councilmember Weber asked why Ramsey County doesn't load the salt into our vehicles anymore. They used to. Public Works Superintendent Frid said they had staff rollover with their operators and they only have one operator. They prioritize getting their trucks filled. Councilmember Weber asked if we are storing salt separately from them. Public Works Superintendent Frid said there are two large salt sheds. We have the back corner of the west salt shed. We buy that material and load our trucks from that supply. Councilmember Weber said the fund is healthy, even after this, but it does get to a low point after the roof and these proposed items. He would like to see budget projections a little further out than 2031. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — APRIL 27, 2026 10 Public Works Director/City Engineer Swearingen said May is the timeline when Finance Director Yang sends notice to start CIP discussion. So we will be dialing in the 10-year CIP for equipment over the next month. The first budget discussion will have those projections. Councilmember Weber said he recognizes the need and he can support this. He hopes we can find a way to use it more often. Mayor Grant said the only other option would be to find a used vehicle with low hours. Public Works Superintendent Frid said he did look into that. He added we do get cooperative contract pricing, which is $100,000 off the list price of the loader. Councilmember Holden said the street sweepers we ordered caused physical issues. She asked if this is ergonomically correct for Staff. Public Works Superintendent Frid said this loader is leaps and bounds better than the 1993 model. Council supported this approach to CIP Equipment. C. Adopt -A -Park Discussion Parks and Recreation Manager Skalicky said the City has a long history of residents doing a lot of great volunteer work in our parks and natural spaces. The 2026 Strategic Plan calls for expanding our current Adopt -A -Park program. The Rotary has adopted Floral Park as a pilot. We want to create a formalized way for individuals and groups to adopt both parks and amenities. Parks and Recreation Manager Skalicky said she researched Adopt -A -Park programs in the Twin Cities and across Minnesota. Most programs recruit volunteers for trash pick-up. The commitment is one hour, once a month. There are a few cities that have more robust programs. Many call them Adopt -A -Spot. There are opportunities for people to adopt fire hydrants, storm drains, streets, rain gardens and different amenities. She didn't see anything with the intensity of what the Rotary is doing at Floral. They are there multiple times a week for multiple hours. Parks and Recreation Manager Skalicky said in developing the Arden Hills program she aims to align with best practices used by peer cities by also creating a program the reflects the existing park stewardship efforts. She wanted to clarify the rolls between the City and the responsibility of the adopters. Parks and Recreation Manager Skalicky said she doesn't want the packet provided to be the public facing document. We can keep it if it serves as a backup for volunteers who want to apply in person or don't have convenient access to a computer. She points that out so tonight's conversation can avoid discussion of fonts and colors. The best practice will be to get this information on the website. It is easier to update the website vs. a printed PDF. The most robust programs have a comprehensive web page that outlines the expectations and responsibilities for the adopters, an integrated online registration system that outlines everything people need to know when they are going to adopt, gives rules for what they are going to do and has a GIS that shows what is available to adopt. She is hoping to outline opportunities for a trash pick-up, have ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — APRIL 27, 2026 11 opportunities for adopt -a -drain, fire hydrant, rain garden, etc., and create opportunities similar to the robust activities the Rotary is doing. Councilmember Holden said most people are interested in park signage. She has visited each park multiple times a year. There's no trash to pick up. She would like to see us push other activities before garbage pickup. She asked if there will be training to recognize what flowers should be planted vs. what weeds should be pulled, if they adopt a park sign. Parks and Recreation Manager Skalicky said we could create a simple handout about what could be planted and the weeds we want them to remove. Councilmember Rousseau asked how many applications we have received so far. Parks and Recreation Manager Skalicky said we aren't actively advertising this program. So the Rotary is the only group. Councilmember Rousseau would be interested in kicking it off with Crepeau, Perry, Cummings and Floral. Those should be the parks to be recommended to premier partners. She thinks the Adopt - A -Spot will help with the encroachment conversations. She said Rotary mentioned there is a communications gap. They are trying to figure out how they can get more support either by using the city website or some listserve. Parks and Recreation Manager Skalicky said said it may not have been decided prior to the partnership with Rotary who is responsible for recruiting volunteers. She noted that best practice is to clearly specify that the adopter is responsible for recruiting volunteers. Councilmember Rousseau said we could send out a message at the beginning of the season to identify a few days where volunteers can show up. Council supports moving forward with the program. Council recessed the Work Session at 6: 56 pm. Council did not return to discuss Work Session items. D. Volunteer Recognition Policy Not Discussed. E. Alternative Funding Sources Discussion Not Discussed. F. Ft. Human Rights Commission F2. Immigration Enforcement Discussion Not Discussed. G. Code of Conduct (Item 3G on published agenda) ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — APRIL 27, 2026 12 Not Discussed. H. Rice Creek Commons/TCAAP Discussion (Item 3H on published agenda) Not Discussed. I. Agenda Planning (Item 3I on published agenda) Not Discussed. 4. COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS None. ADJOURN Mayor Grant adjourned the City Council Work Session at 11:53 p.m., following the Regular City Council Meeting. Jen Estling Deputy Clerk David Grant Mayor DRAFT Qr¢sent-F zt 4r4 Qa75 Years e b � N J`� ry0 Approved: May 11, 2026 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 27, 2026 7:00 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor David Grant called to order the regular City Council meeting at 7:00 p.m. Present: Mayor David Grant, Councilmembers Brenda Holden, Tena Monson, Emily Rousseau and Kurt Weber Absent: None Also present: City Administrator Jessica Jagoe; City Attorney Cynthia Kirchoff; Public Works Director/City Engineer Dave Swearingen; Finance Director Joua Yang; Community Development Director Jacob Reilly; and Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk Julie Hanson PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Councilmember Holden requested Item I and Item J be pulled from the Consent Calendar and be discussed as Items 9A and 9B. MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Monson seconded a motion to approve the meeting agenda as amended. The motion carried (5-0). 2. TCAAP/RICE CREEK COMMONS UPDATE City Administrator Jagoe stated the Joint Development Authority and neither of the advisory committees have met since the last Council meeting. The next JDA meeting will be on Wednesday, April 29th at 5:30. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — APRIL 27, 2026 2 Councilmember Holden asked for an update on the PFAS study. City Administrator Jagoe reported she has been in contact with Ramsey County and understood the County received a copy of this study last week. She indicated there were other agencies that have a review period of the draft report, over the next 30 days, and after this time the study would be made public. Councilmember Holden stated she received several calls from residents about the transparency of the Advisory Committee, and they questioned why the public cannot attend the Advisory Committee meetings. City Administrator Jagoe explained the Advisory Committee meetings are not public. She reported this group is made up of one JDA Councilmember, one JDA County Commissioner and staff members. She noted the Advisory Committee meetings are considered working meetings, updates are provided from staff and feedback is provided from the JDA members. She stated high level notes from these meetings are posted on the City's website. Mayor Grant commented if the Advisory Committee were to allow residents to attend meetings, there was no law against this. City Administrator Jagoe stated she was not aware of a law that would prohibit this. 3. PUBLIC INQUIRIESANFORMATIONAL Kathy Sukke, 1286 Karth Lake Circle, stated in 2022 Arden Hills elected a group of candidates that ran as a slate. These candidates were Tena Monson, Emily Rousseau and Tom Fabel. She reported these individuals thought alike, voted alike and did not have independent ideas. She indicated this group ripped up the City Charter in order to give themselves powers, stacked the JDA with newbies that seemed to get their money and marching orders from outside this small city. She explained Ramsey County had sued the City in 2019 over density and refused mediation, then got 460 additional units in the fall of 2023. She reported Emily Rousseau stacked the Planning Commission as this group was heard gloating about the passage of the affordable housing zoning item at the April 8 Planning Commission meeting. She stated when Commissioner Jacobson asked how this happened the comment was Emily Rousseau. She understood that people with differing views from Emily Rousseau were ousted or wasted their time applying. She stated this was not very inclusive. She reported the slate 2.0 with Kurt Weber, along with the rest of the JDA has made a mess of TCAAP. She explained the JDA was now being sued by the developer. She indicated the JDA has proposed working with multiple developers, which was a concern, and Ramsey County has announced a $70 million infusion to build the spine road when none of this project has been settled. She believed the spine road should not begin until pollution and developer concerns have been addressed. She commented further on the pollution concerns surrounding Building 116. She explained this building sits where the Town Center was to be placed. She indicated at the November 2, 2025 JDA work session, Kurt Weber questioned "why this was the first time he was hearing this". She reported Kurt Weber was elected by just four votes in 2024 over Dave Radziej, noting these votes were counted by Ramsey County that had sued the City. She encouraged Kurt Weber to read the important documents regarding the unresolvable pollution issue. She recommended the JDA stop referring to the main thoroughfare as the spine road until all of the issues have been resolved and the JDA had a developer in place. She reported Arden Hills wants Councilmembers ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — APRIL 27, 2026 3 that will work for the City who value the community as it is and noted Arden Hills should not be a mini St. Paul. Chris Hughes, 3515 Snelling Avenue North, stated he appreciated the "slate". He reported the slate has been treated like a four letter word and noted he was appreciative of the slate. He feared where the City would be without them when it comes to taxes and Rice Creek Commons. He explained he was grateful that the Council has found a way to pass legislation that makes sense for Arden Hills. 4. RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIES None. 5. PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS A. Twin Cities North Chamber of Commerce Mike Dvorak, President of the Twin Cities North Chamber of Commerce, introduced himself to the Council and explained he replaced John Connelly last year as the President of the Chamber. He thanked the City for their continued partnership with the Chamber of Commerce. He reported the goal of the Chamber was to promote business, connect communities and develop leaders. He commented on the board and governance of the Chamber noting the Chamber currently has 300 members. He discussed the programs and events the Chamber sponsored which included Business Connects, engagement and networking events, public policy forums, along with promotional activities for community events, business openings and a career fair. He indicated the Chamber would be promoting the City's 75t' Anniversary celebration which would be held on Friday, July 17 from 4:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. at Cummings Park. He described how the Chamber would be embracing growth through transformation through new opportunities, creating new revenue streams and programs, by changing the narrative, and creating a Young Professionals Network. He spoke further to the concerns facing Minnesota at this time, commented on how he would be working to grow the Chamber in the coming years, and asked for comments or questions from the Council. Councilmember Holden asked of the Chamber would still be holding the auctions. Mr. Dvorak commented the Chamber will continue holding auctions, noting the spring auction was held last week. He discussed how these events assist with raising money for the Chamber while involving local businesses. Councilmember Holden encouraged the Chamber to reach out to the manufacturing/ warehousing businesses Round Lake area. Councilmember Rousseau reported the EDC discussed the last Chamber event and encouraged the Chamber to have more time for networking. She suggested the Chamber consider holding town hall meetings in each sector and consider sponsoring an internship program. She stated one of the EDC members is employed at Bethel University and she might be able toassist in finding possible candidates for the internship program. Mr. Dvorak indicated he was interested in starting an internship program. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — APRIL 27, 2026 4 Mayor Grant stated the City was proud to be a member of the Twin Cities North Chamber of Commerce. He thanked Mr. Dvorak for all he does to promote the businesses in the City of Arden Hills. 6. STAFF COMMENTS A. Transportation Update Public Works Director Swearingen reported Ramsey County's ADA/pedestrian ramp work has begun on County Road E. He noted this work was expected to be completed by Friday, May 8 at which time pavement work would begin. Public Works Director Swearingen discussed the NINDOT improvements that would be completed on Highway 51/Snelling Avenue from Highway 36 to Gray Fox Road. Public Works Director Swearingen explained Xcel had begun work within the City's PMP project area. He indicated the contractor will begin with watermain improvements along Highway 96 in the coming weeks which may require one lane of east bound traffic to be closed. He noted the contractor would also begin hardcourt reconstruction at Arden Manor Park and the ADA improvements at Arden Oaks Park. He stated the City will be sending out letters to the impacted property owners to attend an informational open house on Wednesday, May 13 at City Hall from 5:00 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. Councilmember Holden requested the roadway near the swamp/railroad crossing be addressed during the mill and overlay project. Councilmember Weber indicated at the last meeting there was confusion regarding a memo from City staff. He explained he asked for an item to be placed on this agenda in order to provide clarification on the memo and he was told now would be the appropriate time to ask for clarification. Mayor Grant asked why Councilmember Weber did not ask for an item to be added to the agenda prior to the agenda being approved. Councilmember Weber stated he clarified with staff prior to this meeting that this was the appropriate time to ask staff, during Staff Comments, to speak to this matter. Councilmember Holden commented this was another "gotcha". Councilmember Weber indicated this was completely inappropriate and stated he asked for this item to be on the agenda at the last Council meeting and clarified with staff prior to the meeting that this was the time to bring it up. He stated it appears this was something the Mayor did not want to talk about. Councilmember Holden questioned why staff had not added an Item B under Staff Comments to address Councilmember Weber's concern. City Administrator Jagoe explained in preparation for the agenda for this meeting she shared with the City Attorney that she should be prepared to provide clarification on the memo she prepared with regard to the Consent Agenda item order. She noted Councilmember Weber asked prior to the ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — APRIL 27, 2026 5 meeting why this item was not on the agenda and she said she indicated to the City Attorney that a question would be coming from City Council. She indicated the City Attorney was ready to speak to this matter and apologized for not placing this item on the agenda under Staff Comments. She stated she had the understanding this item would be addressed under the approval of the agenda. Mayor Grant reported as chair of the meeting that this item will not be discussed as part of the Transportation Update. However, he indicated this matter could be addressed under Item 13 which was for Council/Staff Comments. Councilmember Holden asked when the gas line work being done by Xcel Energy would be completed. Public Works Director Swearingen explained the Xcel Energy gas line work would take 12 weeks to complete. MOTION: Councilmember Weber moved and Councilmember Monson seconded a motion to suspend the rules for the purpose of adding an item to the agenda, Item 6B to allow for Discussion of Staff Memo. Councilmember Monson asked for clarification on what can be done if the rules were suspended. City Attorney Kirchoff explained there would be a vote to suspend the rules and if this motion passes, then a vote could be taken to add Item 6B to the agenda. A roll call vote was taken. The motion carried (5-0). B. Discussion of Staff Memo Mayor Grant reported he provided the City Attorney with an attachment prior to this meeting, which was from the Minnesota Parliamentarian's Association President regarding this topic. Councilmember Weber requested the City Attorney provide clarification and speak to the staff memo that she prepared of which was provided to the City Council. City Attorney Kirchoff stated several weeks ago she drafted a memo in response to very specific questions regarding Roberts Rules of Order. She reported the City of Arden Hills abides by Roberts Rules of Order except as amended by City Code. She commented one of the questions she was asked was what was the procedure to request an item be pulled from the Consent Calendar. She summarized what was in Roberts Rules of Order, noting Roberts Rules of Order does not necessarily apply to city councils, but provides for Consent Calendars. She explained consent calendars typically have items that are approved under one motion without discussion. She commented Roberts Rules of Order does not require a vote or motion to remove an item from the Consent Calendar. She indicated when the chair asks for a motion to approve the Consent Calendar, an item could be removed without needing a separate vote, and a motion could then be made on the remaining Consent Calendar items. The item that was pulled could then be addressed under Pulled Consent Items. She stated this was a very basic opinion on this matter. She explained the City does not have any rules of procedure that was adopted but has a section in City Code Section 210.04 entitled Rules of Procedure that states the City has approved Roberts Rules of Order revised. Presumably, the City has adopted the 12th Edition. She reported the City does have a rule about ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — APRIL 27, 2026 6 amending or suspending the rules, which requires a majority vote. She indicated the Council could adopt rules of procedure by code or resolution. City Attorney Kirchoff indicated the second question that was posed to her was how the City could amend something that has already been approved. She noted there were three ways to accomplish this under Roberts Rules of Order. She stated the first option would be to make a motion to reconsider. She reported a motion to reconsider has to be made at the same meeting an item was acted on. She explained once a meeting was adjourned the Council could not make a motion to reconsider an item that was already approved at a future meeting. She commented the second way to amend something that was approved was to make a motion to rescind or a motion to amend. She indicated these were essentially the same procedure, noting a member of the body could make a motion to rescind or amend an item that has already been approved. She reported a member would have to make a motion to add an item to the next agenda, which would give the city clerk notice to add this item to a future agenda. She explained the Council could also ask the city clerk or give notice that they would like a particular item added to the agenda before the agenda was posted. She reported notice would then be given to the body that a motion to rescind would be added to the agenda. She noted the third way to amend something that has already been approved would be to make a motion at a meeting when nothing else is pending. She indicated a motion to rescind, if approved, would mean the previous action did not happen. She commented a motion to amend, if approved, would amend the previous action. Mayor Grant stated this item was brought up after appointments were made to a City board. He recalled that appointments could not be rescinded after appointments were approved. He indicated if this were to come again, he should rule the matter out of order. City Attorney Kirchoff reported this was the case. Councilmember Weber stated the memo from staff did not reflect this. Mayor Grant reported the memo did reflect this under the rescind section. He explained this was an interesting topic and noted he went back to the Minnesota State Association of Parliamentarians. He noted he spoke with the President on this topic and reported he provided the City Attorney with a response from the President regarding this matter. He indicated the opinion of the State Association of Parliamentarians President was that it was the City's custom for the past 25 years that an agenda was approved and when the agenda was approved, the items within the Consent Calendar are set. He reported within Roberts Rules of Order a member can pull an item from the Consent Calendar and items can also be added to the agenda prior to the approval of the agenda. He stated it was the opinion of the Parliamentarians that action can be done this way for the good of the order as a long standing custom. He commented if the Council does not want to do things in this order, a change could be made, but based upon their determination, that was the City's custom and the custom was to be followed. He indicated there were organizations that do things slightly different than Roberts Rules of Order depending on how the group operates. He understood some Councilmembers were newer than others, but this was the manner in which the agenda was approved with items added or removed and the Consent Calendar was set. He explained this then allowed the Council to dispense with the matters at hand. He clarified that the President is not an attorney, does not give legal advice, but rather was a parliamentarian. Councilmember Weber stated he just heard the Mayor tell the Council what the City's custom is or has been for the past 25 years and then attributed this custom to the letter he received without ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — APRIL 27, 2026 7 giving any detail to what the letter says. He reported this custom flies in the face of Roberts Rules of Order. He asked if at any point during the Consent Calendar, according to Roberts Rules of Order, a councilmember wanted to pull an item up until the point of the vote, do they have the right to do that. City Attorney Kirchoff clarified the memo drafted by her office did not discuss a custom of a body. She indicated her memo addressed what is a Consent Calendar and how to amend items that were previously adopted. She explained she had not read the memo from the Mayor. She reported if the Mayor, acting as the chair of the meeting, was asking does someone want to pull an item from the agenda, that was the time for a Councilmember to make an opinion known. She stated there was a time when it became too late and the Councilmember has lost the ability to pull something from the Consent. Councilmember Weber stated he appreciated this opinion. He pointed out that according to the agenda, the Mayor does not ask what he would like removed. Rather, the Mayor asks if the Council would like to approve the agenda and then items are pulled. He stated it was assumed by this Mayor that by approving the agenda that the items on the Consent Calendar were set. He indicated he has done some parliamentarian reading himself and noted the Consent Calendar was viewed as members of a body giving up their right to review something and this was an exceptional situation that requires exceptional lenience. He supported the Council having the right to pull an item, even if this was being done at the last minute because information comes to light all the time. Councilmember Holden noted she pulled two items from the Consent Calendar for this meeting. She indicated she was hearing that the City Council meetings were too long and things were not being accomplished. She reported this topic has already been addressed for over one-half hour. She did not understand why this was becoming so complicated. She noted all Councilmembers were able to add or pull items from the agenda prior to the approval of the agenda. She understood a Councilmember believed the wrong people were appointed to a committee and a motion to rescind was requested. She stated this was the bottom line. She indicated there was a great deal of time being wasted, when items could simply be added or removed prior to the agenda being approved. She asked if the City Administrator recalled Councilmember Weber making a request to receive a copy of Roberts Rules of Order at a previous meeting. She recalled staff sending an email asking if the City Council wanted a copy of Roberts Rules of Order and no one responded. She inquired if Councilmember Weber received a copy of the rules per his request. City Administrator Jagoe reported a book was purchased for Councilmember Weber. Mayor Grant commented it was stated the Mayor did not ask for corrections or additions to the agenda before approving the agenda. He explained since 2010, when he was elected as Mayor, he has asked, under the approval of the agenda at the start of the meeting, are there any corrections or additions to the agenda. He reported if anyone wanted an addition to the agenda all a member had to do was ask. He indicated this has been the Council's custom for his entire time (25 years) on the Council. He noted the memo he provided to the City Attorney from the parliamentarian could be provided to the entire Council. He indicated changes could be made, but noted custom has precedence for meetings and the group was advised to move forward in the same manner unless the group wanted to make changes. Councilmember Weber indicated the last two comments made by Councilmember Holden and Mayor Grant twisted his words. He stated there was never a motion to rescind as suggested by ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — APRIL 27, 2026 8 Councilmember Holden, rather there was a motion to reconsider with the purpose of reevaluating the Mayor's methodology. He stated there was never an issue with the individuals selected, but rather there was concern with the methodology. He commented the Mayor just now twisted his words, noting that the Mayor did not ask if there were any changes to the Consent Calendar but asked if there were any changes or corrections to the agenda. He indicated this was more general and was not a reference to the Consent Calendar directly. He reported if the issue was that the new Councilmembers don't know their way around, a bit of grace could be offered. Councilmember Holden stated if the Mayor asks if there are any changes to the agenda the Consent Calendar was within the agenda. She indicated the twisting of words always happens to Councilmember Weber by the bad guys on the Council. She commented she believed it was ridiculous that the twisting only goes one way. She discussed how it was important to follow a process when it came to approving, removing or adding items to the agenda in order to keep the public informed on when items will be discussed. She encouraged the Council to stop knit picking and to try and move on. Mayor Grant explained he would be standing by previous comments, noting he always asks for corrections or additions to the agenda. He stated he has done this for the past 15 years and Councilmembers are able to add items or correct the agenda. He indicated once the agenda is approved it was approved from top to bottom, including the Consent Calendar. Councilmember Holden asked if the City Administrator should go back and read through the previous minutes to see if a motion to rescind or recess was requested. She stated she was sick of this topic being brought up over and over again. Mayor Grant supported this recommendation. 7. APPROVAL OF MINUTES None. 8. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Motion to Approve Consent Agenda Item - Claims and Payroll B. Motion to Approve Ordinance 2026-009 Amending Chapter 3 of the Arden Hills City Code to Create a Tree Service License C. Motion to Approve Amended 2025-27 Collective Bargaining Agreement for Central Pension Fund Contribution D. Motion to Approve Appointment of Building and Code Enforcement Inspector E. Motion to Authorize Purchase of Residential Recycling Carts from Cascade Engineering F. Motion to Accept Resignation of Kate Olson from the Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee (PTRC) G. Motion to Approve Resolution 2026-025 Appointing Clara Bitzer to the Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee H. Motion to Approve Professional Engineering Services Proposal from I&S Group, Inc. — Chatham Trail Area and Miscellaneous Storm Sewer Improvements ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL APRIL 27, 2026 9 MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Monson seconded a motion to approve the Consent Calendar as amended and to authorize execution of all necessary documents contained therein. The motion carried (5- 9. PULLED CONSENT ITEMS A. Motion to Approve Cooperative Agreement with the City of Roseville — Hamline Avenue Watermain and Trail Improvements (Between County Road C and Snelling Avenue) Councilmember Holden explained she had received a number of questions from residents and indicated she would like to know where the trail would be located. Public Works Director Swearingen reviewed the location of the Hamline Avenue trail within this improvement project. He noted Roseville's goal was to complete a loop around Lake Josephine and Arden Hills had a small segment included in this project. Councilmember Holden asked if the trail area off Lydia would be addressed so the trail would not be underwater. Public Works Director Swearingen commented grading work would be completed to address this concern. Councilmember Weber commented on how the water line would be increased from 12" to 16" through this project. He questioned if HDPE lines would be cheaper for the water lines. Public Works Director Swearingen stated this material line would allow the contractor to receive pricing for HDPE or iron pipe. He indicated Roseville would prefer the project to be completed with ductal iron pipe (DIP). He reported he does not anticipate the bid for the project would change. MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Rousseau seconded a motion to Approve Cooperative Agreement with the City of Roseville — Hamline Avenue Watermain and Trail Improvements (Between County Road C and Snelling Avenue). The motion carried (5-0). B. Motion to Approve Right -of -Way Acquisition and Temporary Easement Costs — Old Highway 10 Trail Improvements Councilmember Holden reported she received calls from two residents on this project asking where the right-of-way acquisitions would occur. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — APRIL 27, 2026 10 Public Works Director Swearingen explained there were four different properties on the west side of Old Highway 10 that required permanent or temporary easement. Councilmember Weber commented on how there was a cost share agreement in place between the City and County. He asked if the City would be receiving a refund for any project costs. Public Works Director Swearingen reported the cooperative agreement with the County has not been drafted and noted it was his intent to have all project and right of way acquisition costs covered by the County. MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Rousseau seconded a motion to Approve Right -of -Way Acquisition and Temporary Easement Costs — Old Highway 10 Trail Improvements. The motion carried (5-0). 10. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Planning Case 26-006 — Amending City Code Chapter 13 — Zoning Code Related to Requirements for Affordable Housing Community Development Director Reilly stated in the fall of 2025, the City Council requested staff begin developing an affordable housing policy for new residential developments in the City of Arden Hills. Staff prepared several presentations about the history of and existing market conditions related to construction, cost, and affordability of new housing in the nation, state of Minnesota, the Twin Cities metropolitan region, Ramsey County and Arden Hills. At the October 2025 work sessions, the City Council received information about affordable housing in Arden Hills and the housing market nationwide. The memos detailed root causes of the nationwide housing crisis, the effect specific to Arden Hills and potential solutions. Community Development Director Reilly explained the City of Arden Hills Planning Commission has review and recommendation authority over proposed changes to Chapter 13 — Zoning Code and held a public hearing at the April 8, 2026, regular meeting of the Planning Commission. Four residents commented at the public hearing. Staff received one written comment. The commission recommended approval of Ordinance 2026-007 as amended by the Planning Commission by a 7-0 vote. Community Development Director Reilly reported for context, Arden Hills' home values and rents are higher than surrounding communities, driven in part by limited net tax capacity, limited transit options, demand for homes within the Mounds View School District, and constrained supply. Arden Hills homeowners have the benefit of paying lower property taxes than owners of similarly valued homes in neighboring cities. Community Development Director Reilly explained at the December 8, 2025, and January 12, 2026, work sessions, the City Council received additional information about local housing market dynamics and discussed various approaches to increasing the supply of affordable places to live in Arden Hills. That information focused on three market -driven, largely no -cost approaches to increasing Arden Hills' housing supply, set in the context of the affordable housing needs the Metropolitan Council estimates Arden Hills must accommodate by 2050, or 221 households earning not more than 60% of AMI (approximately $79,400/year). At the January 12, 2026, City ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — APRIL 27, 2026 11 Council work session, staff were directed to bring back a draft ordinance or policy to address requiring affordable units in project proposals. Community Development Director Reilly stated a draft ordinance tailored to Arden Hills' market conditions was developed for discussion purposes. Both new residential construction and rehabilitation of existing multi -family homes are included in the ordinance which is intended to be market -sensitive, avoid negative impacts to the tax base, and address stated concerns about community character. Following discussion and some revisions to draft language at the February 9, 2026, City Council work session, staff were directed to bring a draft to the Planning Commission for public hearing. Community Development Director Reilly provided further information on the discussion that was held at the Planning Commission meeting. He recommended the Council strike the second paragraph on Page 4 in Attachment A as the language identifies a fee in lieu but there is not a matching paragraph establishing a location for those funds to go. Staff will bring the concept back at a later date. Staff offered the following Findings of Fact: • The City of Arden Hills is proposing to amend ordinance language for Chapter 13 Zoning Code by adding Section 1320.16 Requirements for Affordable Housing. • The proposed ordinance is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan policies to: o Encourage the incorporation of affordable and life -cycle housing into new development and redevelopment where feasible. o Identify programs, policies, and strategies that encourage aging in community for senior citizens. • The health, safety, and economic welfare of present and future residents of Arden Hills depends on the availability of housing choices affordable to people and families at various income levels, including those earning less than 80% of Area Median Income. • Stable, safe, and affordable housing provides measurable health and economic benefits for individuals, families, and the community as a whole. • There is a demonstrated need to encourage the development of affordable housing for Arden Hills' workforce and families. • New residential development can accommodate demand for affordable housing for service workers, teachers, public safety personnel, and other essential community members. • The preservation of naturally occurring affordable housing (NOAH) is critical as market pressures increase rents and threaten the displacement of existing affordable units. • Economic integration of affordable housing within market -rate developments creates diverse, stable neighborhoods and prevents the concentration of poverty and the concentration of wealth. • Amendments to the Zoning Code regulations require a public hearing prior to action by the City Council. • The Planning Commission held the required public hearing on April 8, 2026. Community Development Director Reilly requested the City Council hold a public hearing at this time. Councilmember Weber asked if the density bonuses work with preexisting density bonuses, as was offered within the North Heights senior project. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — APRIL 27, 2026 12 Community Development Director Reilly explained this offers a slightly less aggressive density bonus for projects proposing affordable housing within their projects. He stated the North Heights senior project could have been allowed to go up to 40 units per acre, which was 100% more than was allowed. He noted the proposed language would allow for up to 30 units per acre. Councilmember Weber inquired if this was an either/or and would developers be able to apply the the density bonus in any manner to a project. Community Development Director Reilly reported this was correct. Councilmember Rousseau stated the Planning Commission suggested the language brought forward align with Shoreview. She questioned how the language was working for the city of Shoreview. Community Development Director Reilly indicated staff has some understanding on how this policy was working. He reported there were three projects built prior to the adoption of the policy that voluntarily included affordable housing in part for a financial subsidy from the city. He commented the subsidy was approximately $140,000 per unit, which was far less than the average subsidy required to produce multi -family units in the metro area. He stated the average subsidy was in the range of $300,000 per unit. He explained after adoption of this policy, Shoreview has added more units and has not had any issues working with developers. He noted Shoreview does have more financial resources available to them than the City of Arden Hills does. He reported Shoreview was satisfied with the outcomes that they have had. Councilmember Rousseau questioned if it was necessary to require age restricted developments (55+) to have one three bedroom or larger unit. Community Development Director Reilly commented this has not been a standard but noted many of the 55+ properties had tenants that were still working and there was a demonstrated need in the market for three -bedroom units. Mayor Grant clarified this ordinance amendment would apply to the area in Arden Hills minus the area known as Rice Creek Commons. Community Development Director Reilly reported this was the case. Mayor Grant indicated he did not see this clearly called out within the document. He asked if this was because Rice Creek Commons has the TRC and the remainder of the City follows City Code. Community Development Director Reilly indicated this was correct. Mayor Grant spoke further to the affordability requirements for rehabilitated or renovated units. Mayor Grant opened the public hearing at 8:53 p.m. Kathy Sukke, 1286 Karth Lake Circle, reported there was no public notice of this item. She indicated the April 8 Planning Commission meeting was rather recent, by the slate 2.0's design. She stated affordability sounds so nice but encouraged all residents to ask the question affordability for whom and to whom. She explained 60% of all homeowners in the country have most of their ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — APRIL 27, 2026 13 wealth in their home. She feared that the proposed massive zoning change would impact the value of homes and livability in the northern section of the City, where TCAAP looms with 5,000 people being added to the community and North Heights would be adding 1,200. She reported the addition of 6,200 people would be an assault. She recommended action on this item be tabled or denied until there was transparent and unambiguous public scrutiny. She stated she wanted to better understand how northern Arden Hills would be impacted by an additional 6,200 residents. She was irritated by how the County was proposing a roundabout at TCAAP. She asked that the City speak with the County regarding this matter. She was of the opinion this was an ambiguous document, noting northern Arden Hills has 470 townhouses that qualify for purchase assistance and 280 mobile homes that sit near the arsenal site that were low income. She explained Arden Hills also has apartment complexes in the community. She said the proposed document gave too much power to too few. She stated affordability was utter propaganda given that there has been 25% inflation in the last five years. She indicated the State of Minnesota treats taxpayer money with complacency and willful ignorance, which meant the City and its residents will be taxed for those mistakes to the tune of billions of dollars. She recommended this document not move forward until the Council provides transparency and clarity answer the question of affordability for whom and from whom. Lynn Diaz, 1143 Ingerson Road, stated there was a growing housing crisis and half of renters were cost burdened. She encouraged the City to care about the community and help alleviate this problem. She reported of the eight suburbs, the City was considering the weakest and lowest ordinance. She indicated this was very disappointing. She asked that the Council be leaders when it comes to affordable housing. She discussed how Roseville had added 500 affordable units in recent years and Arden Hills has not added a single affordable unit through the three senior housing developments. She encouraged the City Council to ditch the 80% AMI option. She reported teachers could only afford to live in a one -bedroom apartments at 50% AMI and seniors living on a fixed income would fall into the 30% AMI bracket. She recommended the Lexington Avenue corridor be zoned for affordable housing only. She believed this was the perfect location to develop affordable housing at 60% AMI or below. She urged the City to not lose the opportunity to have meaningful affordable housing in Arden Hills. Steve Erler, 1704 Chatham Avenue, stated he was a member of the Planning Commission but was speaking his own opinions. He reported since 2020 the City has added approximately 200 housing units of senior housing in two separate developments. He indicated another development was coming near North Heights Church that would add another 200 units. He commented it was a good thing to be adding new units to the community but he questioned why affordability was not considered within any of these projects. He stated the North Heights developer came before the City last year for a final consideration and the Planning Commission raised the issue of affordable housing. He noted the Planning Commission was advised by the City Attorney that the City had no basis to raise this issue because the City had no ordinance or policy in place to require affordable housing. He appreciated how this ordinance would provide the City with the legal authority to address affordable housing with future developers. He urged the Council to pass this ordinance as recommended by the Planning Commission. Chris Hughes, 1535 Snelling Avenue North, commented it was obvious to him that approving this Ordinance would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. He supported the City having housing choices that were affordable to families at various income levels. He stated safe, stable and affordable housing provides measurable health and economic benefits for the community. He discussed how service workers, teachers, seniors and other essential personnel were in need of affordable housing in the community. He recommended the City also work to protect the naturally ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — APRIL 27, 2026 14 occurring affordable housing in the community. He urged the Council to support the recommendation from the Planning Commission and to pass the ordinance amendment. Brad Bjorklund, 3550 Ridgewood Court, stated this ordinance was based upon an observation that there was too much greed and selfishness in this country and City. He hoped this ordinance would address this concern and make the City more human. He urged the City Council to support the proposed ordinance amendment, noting he has been working on this topic for over three years. Christy Jacob, 1492 Arden Place, commented that she heard the chamber of commerce state that young people were leaving the Twin Cities and people did not understand why. She explained the price of housing was too high and the average home buyer was now 40 years of age. She reported she had adult children with graduate degrees and promising careers. She stated her children did not believe they could live in Arden Hills. She encouraged the City Council to support proposed ordinance amendment and asked that the City be even more aggressive when it comes to affordability standards. Kay Reese, 2730 Hershell Street North in Roseville, explained she could not afford to live in Arden Hills when she moved to Minnesota from Seattle. She encouraged the Council to consider the time and space that this decision is being made, which was the second quarter of the 21st Century. She discussed how housing was being impacted by hedge funds buying up housing. She asked that the Council not be complacent and comfortable because schools were losing enrollment and the City was in danger of stagnating into an old community. She recommended the City consider how to include young people and the vitality that should be in the community. She feared the community that has been created won't last unless the City Council begins to think differently. Eric Diaz, 1143 Ingerson Road, stated he agreed with many of the comments that have been made. He explained the City needs to strengthen its affordable housing ordinance to require developers to include affordable units in all multi -family units. He reported units at 80% AMI will not help the cost -burdened renters. He supported the Lexington Avenue corridor being used for affordable housing as this would be a walkable area that has a grocery store, pharmacy, YMCA and more. He recommended this corridor be zoned solely for affordable housing. He indicated he has a background in community and regional planning and he encouraged the City pursue more walkable initiatives. He ended his comments by thanking staff and the City Council for their efforts on behalf of the community. With no one coming forward to speak, Mayor Grant closed the public hearing at 9:15 p.m. 11. NEW BUSINESS A. City Code Chapter 13 — Zoning Code Amendments — Planning Case 26-006 • Ordinance 2026-007 Amending City Code Chapter 13 — Zoning Code, Section 1320 to Include a New Section 1320.16 — Requirements for Affordable Housing • Authorization of Publication of Summary Ordinance Community Development Director Reilly stated this item was presented to the City Council under Agenda Item 10.A. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — APRIL 27, 2026 15 Mayor Grant asked if the development next to North Heights Church would be 200 units. He recalled this development would have 119 units. He noted he did research on salaries noting the average teacher salary was $68,000. He stated the starting salary for teachers was $46,000 and high end for teachers was $98,000. He commented full time firefighters earn approximately $89,000 to $113,000 annually. He provided further information on the salaries for firefighters/EMT's, police officers and sheriff deputies. City Administrator Jagoe clarified the North Heights Church housing project would have 119 units. Councilmember Holden discussed how residents in the City moved out of the smaller houses and into the new senior housing, which provided turnover for the City's housing units. She asked if Eden Prairie, Edina, Golden Valley, Hopkins and St. Louis Park have a rental licensing procedures in place. Community Development Director Reilly stated he was not certain if these communities had a rental licensing procedure in place. Councilmember Holden reported she received 20 emails in support of this ordinance and 15 emails against the ordinance. She referred to Section 2, noting the language states the City was to create affordable housing without requiring public subsidy or tax increment. She was of the opinion the City was offering too much density in order to receive affordable housing units. She indicated she would like to see affordable units being built without the density reward. She hoped the Council could amend this language. She noted in Subdivision 5, Applicability Item 5, she recommended this language be changed to read: Purchase from the City of Arden Hills unless the City Council approves a waiver. She reported 30% AMI was originally excluded because that was already low income, noting the maximum was to be 50% AMI. She feared the language within the ordinance was being repetitive. She commented under Item C Item 1, she suggested the language be tighter when it comes to the distribution of units. She questioned if it was a state law that all units had to be constructed with the same design, building materials and construction quality. Community Development Director Reilly indicated he could not confirm this was a state law. He explained this was why he included a provision within the ordinance that all of the units had to be equal in quality. Councilmember Holden commented under Item 2C it states all units are to have access to all amenities. She questioned how this would be managed if an affordable renter was damaging the game room. Community Development Director Reilly stated this ordinance would allow all residents to have access to the amenities and facilities within the apartment building. He reported this requirement was to be followed up to and unless a situation was created when the provision was provoked and this situation would be managed between the property owner and the renter. City Attorney Kirchoff explained this provision would not prohibit a property owner from using another state law to trespass or remove someone from a facility. Councilmember Holden stated under Item 3 would a developer be required to have all five (or 5%) of the three -bedroom units within a housing development remain affordable. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — APRIL 27, 2026 16 Community Development Director Reilly reviewed the affordability requirements within the proposed chart, noting a developer was required to provide a minimum number of three -bedroom units if 60 units of housing were requested. Councilmember Monson inquired if the table was stating 5% of the units had to be affordable or all 5% of the affordable units had to be three bedrooms. Community Development Director Reilly indicated the percentages only apply to projects with more than 150 units otherwise the project would be required to provide five affordable units. He provided further clarification on the requirements within the table. Councilmember Holden suggested the language be reworded for clarity purposes. She recommended the 55+ senior housing developments not be required to have a three -bedroom development. Community Development Director Reilly reported the intent is to address a mix of housing types within a single building or development to accommodate what the market has shown to needs. He explained just because the market shows a need for a specific type of units, it does not mean developers will produce these types of units. Rather, developers tend to develop the most amount of units possible for the least amount of money in order to retain the most amount of rent possible. Councilmember Holden asked about the provisions for three -bedroom units and if that has to do with affordability. She stated she did not support the city telling developers what type of units they can and cannot include in their apartment building, especially if the developer has completed a housing study. Community Development Director Reilly reported market rate developments would not have to provide family -sized units but they would have to ask the City Council for permission to build an all -market -rate project. Councilmember Holden commented under Subsection 7 Item B the provision would allow a tenant to live in a low-income apartment at 140% AMI. Community Development Director Reilly indicated this was the typical standard for having someone move from an income restricted unit into a non -restricted unit. Councilmember Holden expressed concern with the fact an affordable unit could be taken up by a tenant that has an income that makes 140% AMI for fifteen years. She stated if this was the case, she would like the percentage lowered. Community Development Director Reilly reported this was the case. Councilmember Holden indicated she has a problem with the bonus densities. She recommended the 50% be changed to 25% or 15%. She questioned how the 25% parking flexibility was decided. Community Development Director Reilly commented 25% was reasonable and was a standard used by other communities that have parking minimums. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — APRIL 27, 2026 17 Councilmember Holden inquired if 25% was too high and suggested this be lowered to 15% or 20% because most of the tenants living within these developments would need to have a car in order to get to a job because the City did not have public transportation. She requested staff speak to how the distribution of the floater units. Community Development Director Reilly indicated developers will show where the units could be or lease them as tenants come in. He reported this language was taken from another communities' inclusionary housing ordinance and developers have experience with this language. Councilmember Holden questioned if income verification would be done on existing tenants. Community Development Director Reilly stated typically income verification is only done at the time a unit is rented. He noted the City could require income certifications on a yearly basis. Councilmember Holden reported in Attachment B on the first page in the last paragraph she wanted to know who was cost burdened and asked how Bethel and Presbyterian Homes ties into this. Community Development Director Reilly commented those who are cost burdened was anyone not in group quarters. He indicated those living in assisted living facilities were not included in this number. He stated students and those living in memory care facilities were also not included. Councilmember Monson stated she supported the document as presented by staff. MOTION: Councilmember Monson moved and Councilmember Weber seconded a motion to adopt Ordinance 2026-007 Amending City Code Chapter 13 — Zoning Code, Section 1320 to Include a New Section 1320.16 — Requirements for Affordable Housing as amended removing Paragraph 3 in Section 5E. Mayor Grant questioned how many units the City was supposed to have in order to meet the goals of the Metropolitan Council. Community Development Director Reilly reported the City was to add 222 units. Mayor Grant explained TCAAP would add 2,000 housing units to the City and 20% of those units were proposed to be affordable. He indicated this development would add 400 affordable units to the City. He questioned why the City was subjecting current Arden Hills to some of these items. He was of the opinion the City would be well advised to have a rental licensing program given the number of rental units that were being proposed in the City. He anticipated this would assist the City with ensuring affordable units were remaining affordable after construction. He discussed how this ordinance would not impact the Platinum 55 development. Community Development Director Reilly reported this was the case. Mayor Grant asked if this document would be retroactive or impactful on existing apartment buildings. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — APRIL 27, 2026 18 Community Development Director Reilly commented this document would not be retroactive, but if any existing apartment building were to redevelop or be rehabilitated to impact the number of units or rental rates the ordinance would affect what happens next with these properties. Mayor Grant asked what staff meant by Findings of Fact. Community Development Director Reilly explained the Findings of Fact match the findings from the Planning Commission and could be incorporated within the ordinance code language. Mayor Grant recommended the findings be omitted for ease of reading. Further discussion ensued regarding the work staff was doing to update the zoning code. Mayor Grant questioned if Item Sub 2E meant affordable housing units could be created without TIF or subsidies. Community Development Director Reilly reported this provision states affordable units would not be tied to a request for financial assistance and does not prevent the City from responding to a request for financial assistance. Mayor Grant stated he supported the TBI (Total Buy In) paragraph should be stricken. He indicated he was surprised by the inclusion of 30% AMI. He understood the Planning Commission discussed this matter at length and wanted this document to closely align with Shoreview, noting Shoreview does not have a 30% AMI provision. He spoke to how it would be difficult for developers to have deeply affordable units requiring the same design standards as the non - affordable units. Community Development Director Reilly stated research suggests this is not true, but developers will tell the Council that it is. Mayor Grant questioned why the City would require age restricted (55+) developments to have a three -bedroom unit. Community Development Director Reilly commented these developers typically would not put three -bedroom units into a senior complex, even if there was interest. However, three -bedroom units often rent first because they are the hardest to find. Mayor Grant anticipated requiring an age -restricted development to have three -bedroom units could make the proforma or finances more difficult. He suggested the 140% AMI percentage not be allowed in inclusionary housing. He hoped the Council could have more discussion on this topic. He recommended the density bonus percentage be reconsidered. He suggested language be added to the ordinance that states the bonus units could be built to different standards and will be rented at market rate, noting none of the bonus units have to be affordable. He spoke to the covenant language and questioned what the terms "runs with the land" and "required period" meant. City Attorney Kirchoff explained the required period was 20 years and reported runs with the land meant documentation would be recorded against the property. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — APRIL 27, 2026 19 Mayor Grant addressed one of the comments made during the public hearing where an individual referred to the City as being full of greed. He noted these were tough economic times but stated he did not believe the City itself was full of greed. He referenced the inclusionary housing policies that staff provided to the Council, noting there were only eight other cities in the metro area with this type of policy in place. He commented on the other communities that were pursuing inclusionary housing policies and questioned if there were any cities that had 3,000 residents. Community Development Director Reilly stated Falcon Heights has approximately 3,200 residents. Mayor Grant commented it was his hope the Council could discuss this ordinance and gain consensus. Councilmember Rousseau thanked Community Development Director Reilly for all of his efforts on this document. She stated she appreciated all of the discussion the Planning Commission had on this topic as well. She indicated an affordable housing corridor was discussed during the public hearing and noted this was not something the Council would address at this meeting but noted this topic could be addressed by the EDA in the future. She questioned if Section 6.3 were removed would the language within the ordinance be too prescriptive. Councilmember Weber addressed the AMI table. He was of the opinion developers should have to provide 15% of the units at 80% AMI and suggested developers be required to provide 10% of the units at 60% AMI. He indicated he supported the density bonuses as proposed. He addressed a paragraph in Section 5B and recommended fees be collected in lieu of units when possible, noting these dollars would assist with funding future affordability in the City. He suggested this fee be placed on the City's fee schedule and be reviewed on a yearly basis. Councilmember Monson stated her preference would be to keep the AMI table as is. She explained Shoreview has had success with these AMI values and she did not want to drive developers away from Arden Hills and to Shoreview. Councilmember Holden agreed with Councilmember Monson, noting she did not want Arden Hills to be in competition with Shoreview. Councilmember Weber requested further comment from staff on whether the pet fees, parking fees, pool fees, etc. were included in the rental rates and affordability level. Community Development Director Reilly explained optional fees, such as renting a parking space or pet fees were not part of the total rent calculation but utilities were. He reported Subdivision 7- Affordability Controls Rent Limits states that maximum rent for affordable units including utilities, parking and all mandatory fees shall not exceed 30% of the applicable AMI level adjusted for household size and bedroom count. AMENDMENT: Councilmember Rousseau moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a motion to remove Subdivision 6, Item 3. Councilmember Weber supported the table remaining and suggested the 55+ requirement for three -bedroom units be removed. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — APRIL 27, 2026 20 Councilmember Monson stated she preferred requiring developers to construct family sized units. Councilmember Holden indicated the table has limits and explained she would be supporting the amendment. She did not believe it was necessary for 55+ senior developments to have a three - bedroom unit on every floor. Mayor Grant commented he does not see logic in requiring the 55+ senior developments to have three -bedroom units. Councilmember Monson explained she would prefer to keep all of this language but could support striking the 55+ language in Section 3. A roll call vote was taken. The amendment carried 3-2 (Councilmembers Monson and Weber opposed). AMENDMENT: Councilmember Holden moved and Mayor Grant seconded a motion to strike the words "is recommended by the Arden Hills Planning Commission and" from Subdivision 5A Item 5. Councilmember Weber stated a recommendation to deny was still a recommendation. He understood the language may be redundant, but he supported the language remaining as is. City Attorney Kirchoff reported the way the language currently reads, the Planning Commission would recommend approval of a waiver. Councilmember Weber inquired if it was redundant to have this language in place. Councilmember Holden stated all of Item 5 was redundant. Councilmember Monson indicated under the current language, a waiver would need to be recommended for approval from the Planning Commission and the City Council in order to be approved. City Attorney Kirchoff stated this is a really good point. Councilmember Monson commented this meant if the Planning Commission were to recommend denial of a waiver and the City Council were to offer their support, the waiver would not be approved. For this reason, she would support the amendment on the floor. A roll call vote was taken. The amendment carried (5-0). Mayor Grant stated he would like to make an amendment that addresses density bonus units and how they could be market rate and have upgraded features. Community Development Director Reilly cautioned the City Council from putting in code the bonus units could be upgraded from all other units. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — APRIL 27, 2026 21 AMENDMENT: Mayor Grant moved and Councilmember Weber seconded a motion to add "density bonus units may be market rate" to Subdivision 8, Item A. The amendment carried (5-0). AMENDMENT: Councilmember Holden moved a motion to amend Subdivision 7, Item B, reducing the 140% AMI to 120% AMI. Community Development Director Reilly stated this amendment would make Arden Hills different from other communities that follow the federal government standards. Councilmember Holden explained if an individual came in at 30% AMI and was now making 140% AMI, she wanted to see this unit made available to someone else that was making 30% AMI. The amendment failed for lack of a second. AMENDMENT: Councilmember Holden moved and Mayor Grant seconded a motion to amend Subdivision 11, Item A4 noting this language should read: income verification documentation for new tenants and existing. Councilmember Rousseau explained she attended an affordable housing tour in Duluth where parent and child income was discussed. She inquired if the City would be responsible for verifying income levels for renters in affordable housing units. Community Development Director Reilly indicated the income verification would be the responsibility of the City. Councilmember Monson stated she understood the reason for this language because there would be people who would abuse the system. However, she feared an annual check would create situations where housing became unstable for the people who were working to get out of poverty. Councilmember Weber agreed this should not be overlooked and noted he would be open to income verification while not tripping up individuals who may have recently received a promotion. Councilmember Holden commented if an individual went from $12 per hour to $35 per hour over a period of time this person has gotten a foot up. She supported this individual moving to another unit because their income has increased over 100% in order to make the affordable unit available to people who need it. Community Development Director Reilly clarified the rent level for individuals living in affordable units changes based on their income. He stated rent can be increased over time to match the income qualification and is not income restricted housing. Councilmember Monson reported it was getting very late and she would like to excuse the staff members that did not have to remain at this meeting at this time. Mayor Grant recommended Finance Director Yang and Public Works Director Swearingen be excused. Councilmember Monson stated she would like to move this item along. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — APRIL 27, 2026 22 Mayor Grant indicated his sense was that this item was not close to being approved. Councilmember Monson explained she would like to table action on this item to the first Council meeting in May. City Administrator Jagoe reported there was a motion and second on the floor for the amendment proposed by Councilmember Holden. She explained this matter would have to be dispensed with prior to the Council could table action on this item. Mayor Grant stated a motion to table would take precedent. City Attorney Kirchoff indicated this was the case. MOTION: Councilmember Monson moved and Mayor Grant seconded a motion to table action on this item to the first City Council meeting in May. A roll call vote was taken. The motion failed 1-4 (Councilmember Holden, Monson, Rousseau and Weber opposed). Councilmember Monson was of the opinion it was unacceptable for the City Council meeting to go this late. Mayor Grant reminded Councilmember Monson that she voted against tabling the meeting. Councilmember Holden stated this was an important document. She explained she watched the Planning Commission meeting and she had a lot of questions for staff regarding this document. She noted she had six more amendments for the Council to consider. Mayor Grant indicated he had three or four more amendments as well. Councilmember Weber was of the opinion tabling action on this item would be a huge step backwards. He supported the Council moving forward with the additional amendments. Councilmember Monson called the question for the amendment that was on the floor. A roll call vote was taken to call the question. The vote failed 3-2 (Councilmember Holden and Mayor Grant opposed). Mayor Grant explained a two-thirds vote was required to close discussion on a matter. Councilmember Holden inquired if the Mayor was choosing to make this meeting go longer. Mayor Grant indicated he was choosing to allow for additional discussion on this topic. Councilmember Monson excused herself from the meeting. Councilmember Holden expressed concern with the fact that a resident living in a 30% AMI affordable unit could make up to 140% AMI and could remain within the unit. She asked staff to speak to this further. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — APRIL 27, 2026 23 Community Development Director Reilly reported this was not a low-income requirement ordinance but rather was an inclusionary housing ordinance. He explained the desired outcome was mixed income housing and allowing people to remain in place creates a mixed income scenario. He stated once an individual reaches the 140% AMI threshold their unit or another unit becomes an affordable unit. He reiterated that this ordinance was not a provision for housing strictly for people who were low income but rather was for inclusive development. He indicated the affordability was associated with the unit and not the person. Mayor Grant asked if under Subdivision 11, the property owner has to submit the affordability/income verification information to the City. Community Development Director Reilly reported this was the case. Mayor Grant indicated these reports would be submitted to the City, but the City of Arden Hills does not have a rental licensing program. Councilmember Monson returned to the meeting and asked that the discussion return to the matter at hand. Councilmember Holden explained she had questions to ask of staff prior to considering the amendment on the table. Councilmember Rousseau excused herself from the meeting. With there being no further discussion, Mayor Grant called for the vote. The amendment failed 2-2 (Councilmembers Monson and Weber opposed). (Councilmember Rousseau was absent for the vote). AMENDMENT: Councilmember Holden moved and Mayor Grant seconded a motion to amend Section 8, Item A in the second paragraph changing the bonus density from 50% to 35%. Councilmember Weber stated the current language would allow for a density bonus up to 50%. He noted language as is, allows for the City to negotiate with developers in the future. Councilmember Holden commented she did not anticipate developers would go lower when they would be allowed to have a 50% density bonus. Community Development Director Reilly explained the density bonus was written to be negotiable with the words may and up to. Councilmember Holden inquired who would be setting the density bonus. Community Development Director Reilly reported the density bonus would be determined by the City Council. Councilmember Weber excused himself from the meeting. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — APRIL 27, 2026 24 Mayor Grant was of the opinion 35% was too generous. He feared that developers would play a game in order to get as many units as possible on the property, while keeping the number of affordable units low. Councilmember Weber returned to the meeting. Councilmember Monson excused herself from the meeting. Mayor Grant stated he understood the bonus units would rent at market rate. He asked how the City defined market rate. Community Development Director Reilly reported market rate rents today in the Twin Cities were anywhere from $1,200 for a one -bedroom unit to $2,000 for a three -bedroom unit. Mayor Grant inquired if these figures could be equated to AMI. Community Development Director Reilly explained this was a single person making $43,000 per year renting a one -bedroom unit. Councilmember Monson returned to the meeting. Councilmember Holden questioned why the City didn't follow Shoreview's example when it came to density bonuses. She reported Shoreview only allows for eight to 20 units per acre and the City was proposing 50%. Community Development Director Reilly indicated the City was not proposing 50 units per acre but rather was proposing a 50% bonus density. He noted the maximum units per acre in Arden Hills was 20. He stated Shoreview allows for more units per acre in certain parts of their city than Arden Hills does. A roll call vote was taken. The amendment to change the density bonus failed 2-3 (Councilmembers Monson, Rousseau and Weber opposed). AMENDMENT: Mayor Grant moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a motion to amend Subsection 6, Item A to remove 30% AMI. Mayor Grant commented he supported Arden Hills working to closely align with Shoreview on this matter. Councilmember Holden stated developers know how to get funding if they want to put in 30% AMI units. She referred to the table noting the income level referenced was $0 to $50,000. Mayor Grant was of the opinion this reference has no purpose and should be removed. A roll call vote was taken. The amendment to remove 30% AMI failed 2-3 (Councilmembers Monson, Rousseau and Weber opposed). ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — APRIL 27, 2026 25 Mayor Grant stated he really wants to support this ordinance but he was of the opinion leaving the 30% AMI in the document was a mistake. He indicated if this language was removed, he might be able to support the City Code amendment. Councilmember Rousseau excused herself from the meeting. Councilmember Holden explained she did not support the density bonus remaining at 50%. She reported developers would not have to construct any additional affordable units but would be allowed 50% more density under the current language. Councilmember Rousseau returned to the meeting. Mayor Grant stated that was probably true and maybe no developer will choose the 30% option, so he shouldn't let that concern himself and maybe he will support. Councilmember Weber stated there were people who cared about 30% AMI affordability and will go after it. He noted it was about finding the right developer. He explained the City provided a boatload of density to Platinum 55 on the North Heights property for basically nothing but rather was done for a trail segment which they reneged on. Mayor Grant inquired if the Platinum 55 developer would be completing the trail and stated it was his understanding they had not reneged on the trail. City Administrator Jagoe reported the approvals as amended by the Council remain with the proj ect. Mayor Grant questioned if the Platinum 55 project received extra density. City Administrator Jagoe stated the approvals as Council had amended that project still stay with that project. She noted the developer had not yet applied for the building permit and when they do, they would be subject to the development agreement that was recorded on the property. Mayor Grant inquired if they received extra density. City Administrator Jagoe explained that they did not double the density but did in fact receive additional density. She would need to verify the actual number. Councilmember Holden questioned why the Platinum 55 topic was brought up. She asked if this was a delay tactic. She encouraged the Council to stick to one lane. A roll call vote was taken. The amended motion which included striking the paragraph regarding the TBI payment carried (5-0). MOTION: Councilmember Monson moved and Councilmember Weber seconded a motion to Authorize Publication of Summary Ordinance for Ordinance 2026- 007. The motion carried 4-1 (Councilmember Holden opposed). 12. UNFINISHED BUSINESS ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — APRIL 27, 2026 26 None. 13. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Rousseau thanked Kate for serving on the Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee. She welcomed Clara Bitzer to the Committee. Councilmember Rousseau requested the Council receive more information from staff on Ramsey County's Economic Development Authority. Councilmember Rousseau reported she would like more information on the parking citations that were being issued by the Ramsey County Sheriff. City Administrator Jagoe explained she followed up with the Ramsey County Sheriff's Department and learned the parking citations were $31. She noted she was waiting to hear back where these dollars were being allocated and indicated she would provide the Council with this information at an upcoming work session meeting. Councilmember Weber stated he attended the PTRC meeting last week where a presentation was made regarding the installation of a cross-country ski trail around Farrel's Lake. He noted this was Ramsey County Park property but would be a great addition to the community. He reported if this request were to move forward, he suggested the City send a letter of support to the County. Councilmember Holden reported she attended an Earth Day clean up event at the National Guard property. Councilmember Holden explained the 75th Anniversary of Arden Hills would be celebrated on Friday, July 17. Councilmember Holden stated Ruby's Pantry, which was hosted at North Heights Church, has closed. She noted this has led to a growing need with the Ralph Reeder Food Shelf. She encouraged residents to consider making a donation to the food shelf for those in need in the community. Councilmember Monson thanked staff for their patience and for staying late at this meeting. Mayor Grant welcomed the new City Attorney. Mayor Grant thanked Ramsey County for the work that was being done on New Brighton Road. Mayor Grant explained the City was offering a $200 rebate for appliances that conserve water. Mayor Grant thanked Community Development Director Reilly for all of his efforts on the inclusionary housing ordinance. City Administrator Jagoe commented the North Heights property was 10.75 acres and the net acres after wetlands were deducted was 8.55 acres. She indicated the site was eligible for 12 units per acre which would have allowed for 102 units. She noted the density bonus allowed for 13.9 units per acre or 119 units, which was 17 more units than what the zoning code would have allowed for. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — APRIL 27, 2026 27 City Administrator Jagoe reported the Council would have to take action on the work session being recessed earlier in the evening, after this meeting was adjourned. ADJOURN MOTION: Councilmember Rousseau moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a motion to adiourn. The motion carried (5-0). Mayor Grant adjourned the Regular City Council Meeting at 11:53 p.m. Julie Hanson City Clerk David Grant Mayor CONSENT ITEM 8A MEMORANDUM DATE: May 11, 2026 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Jessica Jagoe, City Administrator FROM: Joua Yang, Finance Director Pang Silseth, Accounting Analyst SUBJECT: Claims and Payroll Listing Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: N/A N/A Council Should Consider Motion to approve, table or deny the following: • Claims and Payroll Listing All items need a simple majority for action unless otherwise noted. Funding Source: N/A Background Payroll is processed biweekly and accounts payable is processed weekly. Budget Impact N/A A ��.. ,. i..v..,.. �.. 2026 Payroll #10 Paid Claims - 4/18/2026-5/01/2026 (Check Nos. 54147-54177 and ACH Checks) Total Payroll $172,241.64 $172,241.64 $396,649.32 Total Accounts Payable $396,649.32 Total Claims $568,890.96 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS PAYROLL # 10 CHECKS DATED: 05/08/26 Biweekly: 04/18/26 - 05/01/26 EMPLOYEE DEDUCTIONS AMT. CITY BENEFIT Payment Method FIT 8,942.59 EFT EFT EFT EFT A/P Check* A/P Check* A/P Check* A/P Check* A/P Check* A/P Check* A/P Check* EFT EFT EFT A/P Check* EFT FICA Oasdi 6,804.80 6,804.80 FICA Medicare 1,591.44 1,591.44 SIT 4,387.70 TOTAL TAXES 1 21,726.531 8,396.24 Paid Family Medical Leave -ER Add'l 172.71 Paid Family Medical Leave -ER 1 506.55 Paid Family Medical Leave-EE 506.55 TOTAL PFML PREMIUMS 1 506.551 679.26 Health Premium 2,791.43 38,005.94 Dental Premium 316.28 789.90 FSA Health Care Reimb. 162.50 FSA Dependent Care Reimb. 156.25 TOTAL FLEXIBLE SPENDING 1 3,426.461 38,795.84 HSA Health Saving 1,620.741 1,375.00 TOTAL HEALTH SAVINGS 1 1,620.741 1,375.00 PERA 6,726.43 7,761.25 Missions uare 2,929.66 0.00 Central Pension Fund -Union 2,496.00 MN State Retirement System 1,412.30 TOTAL RETIREMENT 1 13,564.391 7,761.25 XLAC 22.76 EFT A/P Check* A/P Check* A/P Check* A/P Check* A/P Check* ife/Addl/Dep Life 114.34 103.20 ife/Addl non -tax 28.96 TD/STD Insurance 1,508.16 ERA Life Insurance 140.00 JOE 49 Dues (Union) 1 0.00 'OTAL VOLUNTARY 1,814.221 103.20 Total Employee Deductions 42,658.89 Net Payroll 0.00 Direct Deposit 72,423.96 Gross Payroll Tic -Out 115,130.85 Plus City Paid Benefit 57,110.79 TOTAL PAYROLL COST 172,241.64 FICA TIE -OUT Gross Payroll 115,130.85 Less Total FSA 3,426.46 Less Total H.SA 1,620.74 Less Voluntary Ins 51.72 Less Non Taxable Tech Reimb 450.00 Net P/R Subject to FICA 109,754.64 FICA Oasdi @ 6.20% 6,804.80 FICA Medicare @ 1.45% 1,591.44 EFT Accounts Payable Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date User: joua.yang Printed: 5/5/2026 4:07 PM �RQEN HIILLS Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount Invoice No Description Reference ACH 0192 GRAINGER INC 04/24/2026 9881455001 Marking Supplies 216.48 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0192: 216.48 ACH 0243 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL -WASTE WE 04/24/2026 0001204385 May Waste Water 88,052.11 0001204665 2026 Vactor Fee 500.00 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0243: 88,552.11 ACH 0327 STAPLES INC 04/24/2026 6059062340 Refund - Credit -21.49 6059062341 Supplies 21.49 6059062342 Supplies 15.18 6059062342 Supplies 25.28 6059796299 Supplies 29.09 6059796299 Supplies 6.89 6060599212 Supplies 27.71 6060599212 Supplies 53.99 6060662873 Supplies 378.99 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0327: 537.13 ACH 0387 MISSIONSQUARE #302482 04/24/2026 PR 26-09 PR Batch 00200.04.2026 MissionSquare EE Dec PR Batch 00200.04.2026 Mis; 2,580.00 PR 26-09 PR Batch 00200.04.2026 MissionSquare EE Pen PR Batch 00200.04.2026 Mis; 389.11 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0387: 2,969.11 ACH 0922 NINENORTH 04/24/2026 2026-037 Audio Visual -March 599.27 2026-037 JDA Audio Visual -March 197.60 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0922: 796.87 ACH 10442 SPRINGBROOK HOLDING COMPANY 1 04/24/2026 INV-023495 Civic Pay -March 49.00 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 10442: 49.00 ACH 1054 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP 04/24/2026 B20862351 Win Enterprise Upgrade 193.76 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 1054: 193.76 ACH 10556 INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS LLC 04/24/2026 IN5090566 Supplies 35.70 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 10556: 35.70 AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (5/5/2026 4:07 PM) Page 1 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount Invoice No Description Reference ACH 10612 JESSICA SKALICKY 04/24/2026 041726 Mileage Reimbursement 3/17-4/17 158.15 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 10612: 158.15 ACH 10634 JOHNSON CONTROLS BUILDING SOLD 04/24/2026 1-137525700179 HVAC service 5,297.50 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 10634: 5,297.50 ACH 1125 BOLTON & MENK INC 04/24/2026 0392445 2026 PMP 5,405.87 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 1125: 5,405.87 ACH 5180 THE TESSMAN COMPANY LLC 04/24/2026 S431218-IN Seeder 67.57 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 51SO: 67.57 ACH 5587 CES IMAGING INC 04/24/2026 INV182194 April Rental 60.00 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 5587: 60.00 ACH 5593 AMERICAN LEGAL PUBLISHING COR 04/24/2026 50266 Internet Renewal 5/15/26-5/15/27 550.00 50344 Ordinance 2026-001 45.00 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 5593: 595.00 ACH 5665 METERING & TECHNOLOGY SOLUTI( 04/24/2026 INV 10256 3" Compund Meter Permit #2026-00323 5,685.93 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 5665: 5,685.93 ACH 7084 OMNISITE 04/24/2026 106390 Lift Station 14 100.00 106404 Unit 26006 Service Add On 398.85 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 7084: 498.85 ACH ALPI ALLEGRA PRINT & IMAGING INC 04/24/2026 179317 Egg Hunt Signs 195.33 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor ALPI: 195.33 ACH FAST FASTENAL 04/24/2026 MNSPR212057 Supplies 17.08 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor FAST: 17.08 ACH INCI IN CONTROL INC 04/24/2026 S-INVO3564 Q2,2026 ACSP 534.50 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor INCI: 534.50 ACH SRFC SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC 04/24/2026 16750.00-28 Old Hwy 10 Trail -March 2,763.06 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor SRFC: 2,763.06 54147 2597 AARP 04/24/2026 AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (5/5/2026 4:07 PM) Page 2 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount Invoice No Description Reference 04212026 Driver Safety 4/21/26 - C47170 65.00 Total for Check Number 54147: 65.00 54148 0131 BEISSWENGERS HOMETOWN HARDVI 04/24/2026 4022/6 Supplies 55.96 Total for Check Number 54148: 55.96 54149 6502 BSN SPORTS 04/24/2026 933778465 Pickleball Net 479.99 Total for Check Number 54149: 479.99 54150 10642 CPKC 04/24/2026 3000-0011175685 Sewer Cleaning 913.18 Total for Check Number 54150: 913.18 54151 10640 FOREST SAFETY INSTRUCTION LLC 04/24/2026 2669 Saw Training 4/48/26 1,731.00 Total for Check Number 54151: 1,731.00 54152 0849 FRA-DOR INC 04/24/2026 2604002 Dirt Purchases 123.00 Total for Check Number 54152: 123.00 54153 0477 GATHERING PLACE LUTHERAN MINI: 04/24/2026 2026 Parking Lot Snowplowing 2025-2026 1,500.00 Total for Check Number 54153: 1,500.00 54154 10641 McQUIILLAN HOME SERVICE 04/24/2026 327876320 Met Council I/I-1724 Lake Valentine Rd 4,488.75 Total for Check Number 54154: 4,488.75 54155 10486 MINNESOTA METRO NORTH TOURIST 04/24/2026 042026 Quality Inn March 2026 Lodging Tax 2,190.54 Total for Check Number 54155: 2,190.54 54156 10286 MINNESOTA OCCUPATIONAL HEALTF 04/24/2026 521051 March Drug Screening 204.00 Total for Check Number 54156: 204.00 54157 1208 PREMIUM WATERS INC 04/24/2026 610207-03-26 March Water 17.33 613317-03-26 March Water 84.26 Total for Check Number 54157: 101.59 54158 0811 RAMSEY COUNTY 04/24/2026 FLEET-001069 February Fuel 1,912.75 FLEET-001073 March Fuel 3,033.92 PRK-002680 Q12026Inspections 933.60 PRMG-005957 PW Rental Space -May 1,406.82 PRMG-005957 PW Rental Space -May 3,165.35 PRMG-005957 PW Rental Space -May 6,330.70 PRMG-005957 PW Rental Space -May 3,165.35 AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (5/5/2026 4:07 PM) Page 3 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount Invoice No Description Reference PRRRV-004155 Taxpayer Report 150.00 PRRRV-004156 Q2 2026 Election Services 7,531.00 PRRRV-004178 TNT Notice 982.64 Total for Check Number 54158: 28,612.13 54159 6748 RELIANCE STANDARD 04/24/2026 GL154938.0526 May Insurance 1,897.94 Total for Check Number 54159: 1,897.94 54160 10354 ST. PAUL PIONEER PRESS 04/24/2026 39817 2026 PMP 85.88 39817 PC 26-006 Affordable Housing 41.32 39817 Summary Ordinances 257.26 Total for Check Number 54160: 384.46 54161 10638 STATE INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS 04/24/2026 904165998 Weed Killer 329.00 Total for Check Number 54161: 329.00 54162 U13*00833 TED SWANSON 04/24/2026 Refund Check 010833-000, 3517 Siems Court 22.22 Total for Check Number 54162: 22.22 54163 10609 WALTERS RECYCLING & REFUSE INC 04/24/2026 0009614974 March Recycling 20,250.73 0009617578 March PW Waste 1,201.27 Total for Check Number 54163: 21,452.00 Total for 4/24/2026: 179,179.76 ACH ACH001 US BANK 04/30/2026 ARVIM42026 APPLE.COM/BILL 0.99 BAARS42026 FLEET FARM 3100 51.09 BAARS42026 MENARDS BLAINE MN 7.11 BAARS42026 COREMARK METALS -MN 457.33 BAARS42026 THE HOME DEPOT #2828 62.62 BAARS42026 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY -Herbicide 1,240.01 CHRIM42026 MENARDS BLAINE MN 14.67 CHRIM42026 MENARDS BLAINE MN 181.55 CHRIM42026 THE HOME DEPOT #2828-watermain insulatio 454.00 CHRIM42026 APPLE.COM/BILL 0.99 CHRIM42026 COREMARK METALS -MN -celebration signs 406.77 FRIDJ42026 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITI 20.00 FRIDJ42026 AMAZON MKTPL*B54V22NR1 28.97 FRIDJ42026 AMAZON MKTPL*B70268ZA1 141.99 GEBAM42026 APPLE.COM/BILL 0.99 HANSJ42026 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITI-CC LMC Cox 470.00 HANSJ42026 MINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES-MCFOA Ins 540.00 HANSJ42026 HIGHTAIL PRO PLAN -Subscription 96.00 JOHNM42026 SAMSCLUB #6309-Egg Hunt 351.18 JOHNM42026 SAMSCLUB #6309-Egg Hunt -122.88 JOHNM42026 CANVA* I04845-43665896-yearly subscription 149.90 JOHNM42026 TARGET 00006197-Egg Hunt -42.10 JOHNM42026 TARGET 00006197-Egg Hunt 163.17 AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (5/5/2026 4:07 PM) Page 4 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount Invoice No Description Reference JOHNM42026 FUN EXPRESS -Egg Hunt 335.92 JOHNM42026 TARGET 00006197-Egg Hunt 24.94 MIKAT42026 APPLE.COMBILL 0.99 MILLL42026 2026 APWA-MN SPRING CO-APWA Conferen 620.99 MILLL42026 GRAND VIEW LODGE RESRT-APWA Confer 415.16 MOONJ42026 APPLE.COMBILL 0.99 SEIFM42026 CHETS SHOES LLC - SLP -Boots 140.25 SWEAD42026 2026 APWA-MN SPRING CO 620.99 SWEAD42026 GRAND VIEW LODGE RESRT 415.16 YANGJ42026 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFF-GFOA Tranin 105.00 YANGJ42026 AMAZON.COM-Printer -339.99 YANGJ42026 AMAZON.COM-Printer -339.99 YANGJ42026 WILLSCOT MOBILE MINI -Hazelnut Warming 1,014.00 YANGJ42026 AMAZON MKTPL*BG6T53FU1-Toner Cartrid 26.97 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor ACH001: 7,715.73 ACH ACH002 AFLAC 04/30/2026 575306 Insurance Premiums -April 2026 45.52 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor ACH002: 45.52 ACH ACH005 MINNESOTA REVENUE -SALES & USE 04/30/2026 4132026 March Sales/Use Tax 0.74 4132026 March Sales/Use Tax 98.48 4132026 March Sales/Use Tax -0.48 4132026 March Sales/Use Tax 3,539.26 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor ACH005: 3,638.00 ACH ACH006 MINNESOTA DEPT OF LABOR-BLDG P 04/30/2026 4142026 Q1 Building Surcharge -221.91 4142026 Q1 Building Surcharge 5,547.64 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor ACH006: 5,325.73 ACH ACH008 HEALTHEQUITY 04/30/2026 Ohd2a0x Monthly Fee -April 61.05 4032026 Health Care DCRA 559.98 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor ACH008: 621.03 Total for 4/30/2026: 17,346.01 ACH 0192 GRAINGER INC 05/01/2026 9892150039 Supplies 101.12 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0192: 101.12 ACH 0319 CITY OF ROSEVILLE 05/01/2026 0242736 March Water & Q1 AH Reads 144,996.42 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0319: 144,996.42 ACH 0327 STAPLES INC 05/01/2026 6061033960 Supplies 76.18 6061033960 Supplies 44.19 6061033961 Supplies 104.09 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0327: 224.46 AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (5/5/2026 4:07 PM) Page 5 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount Invoice No Description Reference ACH 0381 MISSIONSQUARE RETIREMENT 05/01/2026 20260331-109 Qtrly Fee 4/l/2026-6/30/2026 20260331-109-32, 250.00 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0381: 250.00 ACH 0750 VERIZON WIRELESS 05/01/2026 6140756039 Service 3/11-4/10 951.10 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 0750: 951.10 ACH 10363 MINUTE MAKER SECRETARIAL 05/01/2026 M2219 PC Meeting Minutes 4/8 385.50 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 10363: 385.50 ACH 10556 INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS LLC 05/01/2026 IN5104845 Supplies 303.04 IN5104845 Supplies 106.08 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 10556: 409.12 ACH 10634 JOHNSON CONTROLS BUILDING SOL1 05/01/2026 1-137592452332 Boiler System Service 3,329.91 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 10634: 3,329.91 ACH 1125 BOLTON & MENK INC 05/01/2026 0393046 RRA Report 3,960.00 0393046 ERP Report 5,755.00 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 1125: 9,715.00 ACH 1223 ADAM'S PEST CONTROL - MAIN 05/01/2026 4394712 Pest Control -April 94.62 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 1223: 94.62 ACH 5180 THE TESSMAN COMPANY LLC 05/01/2026 S432691-IN Supplies 987.50 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 5180: 987.50 ACH 5593 AMERICAN LEGAL PUBLISHING COR 05/01/2026 50512 Ord 2026-004, 005, 006 126.00 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 5593: 126.00 ACH 8032 PACE ANALYTICAL FIELD SVC INC 05/01/2026 26123844 March Drinking Water Survey 1,592.70 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 8032: 1,592.70 ACH GrantD DAVID GRANT 05/01/2026 042926 Milage Reimbursement: Excel Partners 29.00 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor GrantD: 29.00 54164 10629 AERIAL ILLUMINATIONS 05/01/2026 INV-250204 75th Anniversary Drones 2,500.00 Total for Check Number 54164: 2,500.00 54165 10200 BADGER STATE INSPECTION LLC 05/01/2026 AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (5/5/2026 4:07 PM) Page 6 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount Invoice No Description Reference 1001397 Power Wash 4,500.00 Total for Check Number 54165: 4,500.00 54166 0131 BEISSWENGERS HOMETOWN HARDVI 05/01/2026 4135/6 Supplies 11.97 4137/6 Supplies 44.97 Total for Check Number 54166: 56.94 54167 6842 BELSON OUTDOORS LLC 05/01/2026 395475 Malibu Benches 1,531.41 Total for Check Number 54167: 1,531.41 54168 6502 BSN SPORTS 05/01/2026 933778465 Pickleball Net 20.00 Total for Check Number 54168: 20.00 54169 10574 CAPRA'S UTILITIES INC 05/01/2026 8181 Met Council I&I-3371 Snelling Ave 5,000.00 Total for Check Number 54169: 5,000.00 54170 10483 CENTRAL PENSION FUND 05/01/2026 401333.0426 April Apprenticeship Fund 351.68 Total for Check Number 54170: 351.68 54171 CPF1 CENTRAL PENSION FUND SOURCE A 05/01/2026 184503.0426 April Pension 3,840.00 Total for Check Number 54171: 3,840.00 54172 10549 COACH CLIFF'S GAGA BALL PIT LLC 05/01/2026 43004 Ball Pit Bracket Systems & Doorway Kits 2,832.00 Total for Check Number 54172: 2,832.00 54173 0447 I.U.O.E LOCAL 49 BENEFIT FUND-INSI 05/01/2026 BP3.0626 June Insurance 13,400.00 NB4.0626 June Insurance 1,907.00 Total for Check Number 54173: 15,307.00 54174 0600 NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS 05/01/2026 315800052026 May Insurance 96.00 Total for Check Number 54174: 96.00 54175 0155 OFFICE OF MN IT SERVICES-ACCTS R 05/01/2026 W26030622 March Phones 751.04 Total for Check Number 54175: 751.04 54176 10495 TENET 05/01/2026 INV-51214 Supplies 81.24 Total for Check Number 54176: 81.24 54177 3099 TRI STATE BOBCAT INC-LITTLE CANS 05/01/2026 A62482 Supplies 63.79 AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (5/5/2026 4:07 PM) Page 7 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount Invoice No Description Reference Total for Check Number 54177: 63.79 Total for 5/l/2026: 200,123.55 Report Total (70 checks): 396,649.32 AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Date (5/5/2026 4:07 PM) Page 8 CONSENT ITEM - 8B MEMORANDUM DATE: May 11, 2026 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Jessica Jagoe, City Administrator FROM: Joua Yang, Finance Director SUBJECT: 2026 1st Quarter Financials Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: N/A N/A Council Should Consider Motion to approve, table or deny the following: Funding Source: N/A Quarterly budget to actual fund statements and investment portfolio detail for the City. Background Investments - per the Investment Policy, our Benchmark Rate is the 4M plus Rate. At March 31, 2026 — this rate was 3.604%, and our portfolio is averaging 3.64%. Our average rate will begin to increase as lower -interest investments mature, and we continue to invest in higher -interest investments. All of our investments are in government -secured or government -backed deposits. Utility billing cycles and CIP projects are taken into account when determining how much to invest and for how long. Basis of accounting — during the year, City books are kept on a cash basis, which means that only items that are received are booked as revenue, and items paid are booked as expenses. Adjustments for accruals, deferrals, and other accounting requirements are made at year-end. The first quarter financial results are generally as expected and mostly positive across all City funds. City revenue streams are on target with prior year and budget, and departments are, for the most part, under the 25% expended thus far in the year. General Fund — The main source of revenue for the City is property taxes, and these come in twice a year. Expenditures are at 24.5% of the budget through the end of the quarter, compared to 20.2% last year. Some of this difference is due to the timing of invoices. Page 1 of 2 Other governmental funds and enterprise funds — Utility revenue for the first quarter is booked in April 2026, and annual transfers between funds will be booked later in the year. Market value adjustments for investments total ($87,309.77) through the end of the first quarter. At the end of 2025, the City recognized a market value gain of $186,912.50. It is important to note that the City holds its investments to maturity, and no principal is ever lost on an investment. Discussion City Staff respectfully requests that the City Council review the quarterly updates for further discussion. Budget Impact None. Attachments Attachment A: Investment Portfolio Analysis Attachment B: General Fund Revenues and Expenditures Summary Attachment C: Other City Funds Revenues and Expenditures Summary Attachment D: Permit Data Page 2 of 2 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS FOR THE MONTH ENDING MARCH, 2026 Market Value Deposits - Expenditures Institution Descriution Tvoe l/l/2026 Purchases Maturities Attachment A Unadjusted Market Value Market Value Unrealized Interest 3/31/2026 3/31/2026 gain/loss Wells Fargo - Adv Wells Fargo Advisors Money Market � 26,129.72 $ 246,225.00 � 954.05 $ 273,308.77 $ 273,308.77 $ - 7 Wells Fargo - Adv FHLB Municipal Securities 244,020.00 - (245,000.00) 1,225.00 245.00 - (245.00) Wells Fargo -Adv FHLB Municipal Securities 456,168.20 - - 456,168.20 456,991.60 823.40 726,317.92 246,225.00 (245,000.00) 2,179.05 729,721.97 730,300.37 578.40 RBC RBC Money Market - - - - - - - RBC Palm Beach Fla Rev Municipal Securities 390,000.00 - (394,875.00) 4,875.00 - - - RBC City National Bank Brokered CD 244,090.28 - (249,379.' 5,379.70 90.28 - (90.28) RBC First Oklahoma Brokered CD 246,044.37 - (491.18) 491.18 246,044.37 247,747.53 1,703.16 RBC Skokie IL Municipal Securities 285,235.30 285,235.30 286,076.30 841.00 RBC Hawaii St GO Bds Municipal Securities 355,943.00 - (9,502.50) 9,502.50 355,943.00 353,570.00 (2,373.00) RBC FFCB 1 Municipal Securities 290,364.00 290,364.00 291,291.00 927.00 RBC MHFA Municipal Securities 225,303.40 - (2,507.00) 2,507.00 225,303.40 225,377.00 73.60 RBC New York, NY Municipal Securities 385,016.00 - (2,500.00�00.00 385,016.00 385,884.00 868.00 RBC Vista Calif Uni Sch Dist Municipal Securities 288,633.00 - (1,981.50) 1,981.50 288,633.00 289,794.00 1,161.00 RBC San Francisco CA Municipal Securities 335,535.65 - - - 335,535.65 335,593.60 57.95 RBC Elk Grove Village IL Municipal Securities 287,793.00 - (2,175.00) 2,175.00 287,793.00 287,928.00 135.00 RBC ane McHenry Cook & Deka Municipal Securities 349,002.50 - (6,177.50) 6,177.50 349,002.50 346,944.50 (2,058.00) RBC City of Milwaukee WI Municipal Securities 405,800.00 - (9,200.00) 9,200.00 405,800.00 404,500.00 (1,300.00) RBC City of Minneapolis MN Municipal Securities 350,098.00 - (7,024.50) 7,024.50 350,098.00 350,024.50 (73.50) RBC Washington Cry OR SD#48. Municipal Securities 331,837.60 - - - 331,837.60 330,326.75 (1,510.85) RBC ;an Diego CA Comm Colleg Municipal Securities 340,070.50 (4,299.75) 4,299.75 340,070.50 339,076.50 (994.00) RBC a Oak Banking Co Wilming Brokered CD 248,696.22 - (2,271.69) 2,271.69 248,696.22 247,824.72 (871.50) RBC Cook County IL Sch Dist Municipal Securities 140,005.60 - 140,005.60 139,596.80 (408.80) RBC Pelican Rapids MN Municipal Securities 456,959.30 - (3,332.00) 3,332.00 456,959.30 456,748.60 (210.70) RBC Shakopee MN ISD 720 Municipal Securities 232,147.50 - (1,731.25) 1,731.25 232,147.50 231,945.00 (202.50) RBC City of Dallas TX Municipal Securities 352,976.00 - - - 352,976.00 354,276.00 1,300.00 RBC FFCB Municipal Securities 299,199.00 - - - 299,199.00 297,897.00 (1,302.00) RBC Farmer MAC Municipal Securities 498,970.00 - - - 498,970.00 496,845.00 (2,125.00) RBC Morgan Stanley Brokered CD - 245,000.00 - 245,000.00 244,671.70 (328.30) RBC Morgan Stanley Brokered CD - 245,000.00 - 245,000.00 244,671.70 (328.30) RBC FFCB Municipal Securities 509,273.55 - 509,273.55 507,508.65 (1,764.90) RBC State of Minnesota Municipal Securities 357,856.20 - - - 357,856.20 357,411.60 (444.60) RBC mpton TWP PA School Dist Municipal Securities - 339,693.40 (3,420.00) 3,420.00 339,693.40 333,199.20 (6,494.20) RBC CALIFORNIA ST Municipal Securities 529,680.00 - - - 529,680.00 524,175.00 (5,505.00) RBC City of Duluth, MN Municipal Securities 391,424.00 - (7,600.00) 7,600.00 391,424.00 388,620.00 (2,804.00) RBC DALLAS, TX Municipal Securities 382,855.00 - - - 382,855.00 383,210.00 355.00 RBC CALIFORNIA ST Municipal Securities - 472,356.67 - - 472,356.67 459,490.00 (12,866.67) RBC CALIFORNIA ST Municipal Securities 504,480.00 - - - 504,480.00 498,510.00 (5,970.00) RBC KING CNTY, WA Municipal Securities 496,215.00 - - - 496,215.00 494,550.00 (1,665.00) RBC DALLAS, TX Municipal Securities - 370,300.00 - - 370,300.00 363,305.00 (6,995.00) RBC NEW JERSEY ST Municipal Securities - 464,337.78 - - 464,337.78 451,895.00 (12,442.78) RBC BALTIMORECNTY MD Municipal Securities - 459,516.00 - - 459,516.00 446,575.00 (12,941.00) RBC CALIFORNIA ST Municipal Securities 524,070.00 - (12,875.00) 12,875.00 524,070.00 512,830.00 (11,240.00) 11,035,573.97 2,596,203.85 (721,343.57) 87,343.57 12,997,777.82 12,909,889.65 (87,888.17) PMA 4MGeneral Money Market 7,138,676.82 3,735,984.55 (8,405,172.24) 38,394.68 2,507,883.81 2,507,883.81 - PMA 4MP General Money Market 782,316.11 - - 7,076.58 789,392.69 789,392.69 - PMA 4MPayroll Money Market 67,526.54 437,683.15 (505,216.83) 37.29 30.15 30.15 0.00 PMA 2025A G.O. CIP Bonds Money Market 98,453.51 - - 887.74 99,341.25 99,341.25 - 8,086,972.98 4,173,667.70 (8,910,389.07) 46,396.29 3,396,647.90 3,396,647.90 0.00 Total cash and investments $ 19,848,864.87 $ 7,016,096.55 $ (9,876,732.64) $ 135,918.91 $ 17,124,147.69 $ 17,036,837.92 $ (87,309.77) � O 69 69 N N O C1301 M M r- O N 00 M M uq 69 N C1 00 Vl l- N — 01 > ON O M l N 00 N M 69 69 In U V -� CJ Cn `n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 69 6F3 69 6A 69 Ef3 69 i r- kn O N kr; ' kr; CN CN aN 00 �c C� rn O fn 69 ~ I 69 II 69 b W a U U B CITY OF ARDEN HILLS Attachment STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES GENERAL FUND FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2026 YTD YTD YTD YTD Annual Through % of Annual Through % of Budget 03/31/26 Budget Budget 03/31/25 Budget REVENUES $ 5,892,322 $ - 0.0% Taxes $ 5,359,798 $ - 0.0% 574,150 212,303 37.0% Licenses and permits 550,540 240,338 43.7% 165,379 67,243 40.7% Intergovernmental 176,296 61,930 35.1% 470,251 153,272 32.6% Charges for services 471,994 152,214 32.2% 24,225 5,832 24.1% Fines and forfeits 17,360 4,236 24.4% - - N/A Special assessments - - N/A 50,000 11,437 22.9% Investment earnings 50,000 8,364 16.7% 178,330 1,703 1.0% Miscellaneous 13,282 3,795 28.6% 7,354,657 451,790 6.1% TOTAL REVENUES 6,639,270 470,877 7.1% EXPENDITURES $ 85,743 $ 37,183 43.4% Mayor & Council 93,819 37,478 39.9% 524,881 115,289 22.0% Administration 506,835 80,548 15.9% 35,906 7,532 21.0% Elections 61,750 7,531 12.2% 225,193 67,022 29.8% Finance 220,756 53,763 24.4% 139,170 14,569 10.5% TCAAP 121,920 10,295 8.4% 387,410 69,146 17.8% Planning & Zoning 352,790 59,135 16.8% 250,032 61,780 24.7% Government Buildings 240,932 47,827 19.9% 1,994,763 498,470 25.0% Public Safety 1,761,288 293,048 16.6% 86,350 - 0.0% Dispatch 73,570 12,261 16.7% 1,065,552 532,776 50.0% Fire Protection 906,321 446,087 49.2% 9,270 1,734 18.7% Emergency Management 9,780 1,153 11.8% 428,700 85,116 19.9% Protective Inspections 373,160 66,208 17.7% 943,854 137,527 14.6% Street Maintenance 960,790 92,267 9.6% 378,008 64,563 17.1% Recreation 337,508 31,582 9.4% 759,825 127,170 16.7% Park Maintenance 690,060 124,138 18.0% 100,000 - 0.0% Transfers Out 50,000 - 0.0% $ 7,414,657 $ 1,819,876 24.5% TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 6,761,279 $ 1,363,320 20.2% $ (60,000) $ (1,368,086) 2280.1% NET CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE $ (122,009) $ (892,444) 731.5% 25.0% Percentage of Year Complete 25.0% Q1-2026 Year -To -Date (YTD) Financial Performance Commentary Revenues Tax revenues are collected twice a year. Licenses & Permits. Permit revenues are slightly down from the prior year due to the timing of development projects. Intergovernmental. In line with prior year. Charges for Services. In line with prior year. Expenditures Salaries & Benefits. Increases across departments due to anticipated COLA, insurance, and MN Paid Leave increases. Mayor & Council. In line with prior year. Northeast Youth & Family Services contract paid in full in Q1 ($25K). Administration. Vacancy savings in 2025 (Permit Tech and Communications Coordinator); legal fees slightly up from prior year and timing of technology charges. Finance. Timing and anticipated increase in technology charges (Springbrook). TCAAP. Vacancy savings in 2025 (CD Director). Planning & Zoning. Vacancy savings in 2025 (CD Director). Gov't Buildings. Timing and anticipated increase of rent charges for Public Works Maintenance Facility. Public Safety. Contract increase in line with budget expectations. Fire Protection. Contract increase in line with budget expectations. 1st Half of the fire contract fully paid in Q1 2026. Protective Inspections. Vacancy Savings in 2025 (Permit Tech). Street Maintenance. Timing of Q4 2025 Salt/Sand invoice; Timing of Q1 technology and central garage charges. Recreation. P&R Manager mid -year start in 2025, full -year in 2026. Park Maintenance. Timing of central garage charges. General Fund Revenues Miscellaneous ' 2 Investment earnings ` 11 Special assessments 0 Fines and forfeits ` 6 Charges for services 153 Intergovernmental i 67 Licenses and permits Taxes 0 $ $50 $100 $150 $200 $250 $300 $350 $400 $450 $500 Thousands ■ 2025 ■ 2026 General Fund Expenditures Transfers Out _ Park Maintenance 127 Recreation 11111116— 65 Street Maintenance 138 Protective Inspections � 85 Emergency Management 1 2 Fire Protection 533 Dispatch Public Safety 498 Government Buildings 62 Planning & Zoning 69 TCAAP S 15 Finance 67 Elections 1 g Administration 115 Mayor & Council $37 $- $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $600 Thousands ■ 2025 0 2026 Attachment C CITY OF ARDEN HILLS OTHER GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS BUDGET SUMMARY FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2026 2026 Amended % of Budget YTD Budget 2025 Amended % of Budget YTD Budget CABLE TV (35,262) (35,262) Beg Fund Balance 27,597 27,597 192,000 - 0.0% Revenues 142,000 387 0.3% 149,640 23,011 15.4% Expenditures 147,200 20,220 13.7% 7,098 (58,273) End Fund Balance 22,397 7,765 Cable TV. Franchise revenues are receipted quarterly, in the month following the end of the quarter (Apr, Jul, Oct, Jan). EDA GENERAL 831,679 831,679 Beg Fund Balance 771,481 771,481 - 2,150 N/A Revenues - 1,939 N/A 283,438 36,955 13.0% Expenditures 84,952 16,880 19.9% 548,241 796,875 End Fund Balance 686,529 756,540 EDA. Tax revenues are collected twice a year (Jun, Nov) TIF FUNDS 1,244,108 1,244,108 Beg Fund Balance 1,353,342 1,353,342 - - N/A Revenues - 3,829 N/A 5,700 - 0.0% Expenditures 5,700 - 0.0% 1,238,408 1,244,108 End Fund Balance 1,347,642 1,357,171 TIF. TIF note for TIF #4 Presbyterian Homes has been paid in full. DEBT SERVICE -PS 494,720 494,720 Beg Fund Balance 435,000 - 0.0% Revenues N/A 230,400 90,722 39.4% Expenditures N/A 699,320 403,999 End Fund Balance Debt Service - Public Safety. Debt Service for the City's share of the new Lake Johanna Fire Station project, funded by electric franc EQUIP & BUILDING CAPITAL 772,991 772,991 Beg Fund Balance 510,555 510,555 472,500 2,145 0.5% Revenues 495,000 34,410 7.0% 410,000 133,787 32.6% Expenditures 708,170 80,603 11.4% 835,491 641,350 End Fund Balance 297,385 464,362 Equipment & Building. Transfers from General Fund are normally completed during the 4th quarter. PARK DEVELOPMENT 224,549 224,549 Beg Fund Balance 215,238 215,238 1,000 757 75.7% Revenues - 620 N/A 6,750 - 0.0% Expenditures - - N/A 218,799 225,307 End Fund Balance 215,238 215,858 Parks. PIR FUND 2,952,649 2,952,649 Beg Fund Balance 3,118,982 3,118,982 3,557,592 389,732 11.0% Revenues 1,163,436 17,795 1.5% 3,484,950 115,517 3.3% Expenditures 1,648,120 32,633 2.0% 3,025,291 3,226,864 End Fund Balance 2,634,298 3,104,144 PIR. Bethel final reimbursement for pedestrian trail was received in 2023. Timing of expenditures for construction projects -Arden Manor, Floral Park, Perry Park, 2024 PMP. FIRE EQUIP CAPITAL 689,029 689,029 Beg Fund Balance 409,205 409,205 332,000 7,656 2.3% Revenues 720,000 1,185 0.2% 399,674 368 0.1% Expenditures 554,252 5,750 1.0% 621,355 696,317 End Fund Balance 574,953 404,641 25.0% Percentage of Year Complete 25.0% CITY OF ARDEN HILLS OTHER GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS BUDGET SUMMARY FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2026 BEGINNING FUND FUND BALANCE REVENUES EXPENDITURES NETCHANGE Cable TV Budget (35,262) 192,000 (149,640) 7,098 Actual - (23,011) (23,011) % of Budget 0.0% 15.4% EDA General Budget 831,679 - (283,438) 548,241 Actual 2,150 (36,955) (34,805) % of Budget N/A 13.0% EDA Revolving Budget - - Actual - % of Budget N/A N/A TIF 3 Cottage Villas Budget 843,253 (1,900) 841,353 Actual - - % of Budget N/A 0.0% TIF 4 Pres Homes Budget 429,374 (1,900) 427,474 Actual - - % of Budget N/A 0.0% TIF 5 TCAAP Budget (28,519) (1,900) (30,419) Actual - - % of Budget N/A 0.0% Debt Service Public Safety Budget 494,720 435,000 (230,400) 699,320 Actual - (90,722) (90,722) % of Budget 0.0% 39.4% Equipment & Building Budget 772,991 472,500 (410,000) 835,491 Actual 2,145 (133,787) (131,641) % of Budget 0.5% 32.6% Park Budget 224,549 1,000 (6,750) 218,799 Actual 757 - 757 % of Budget 75.7% 0.0% PIR Budget 2,952,649 3,557,592 (3,484,950) 3,025,291 Actual 389,732 (115,517) 274,215 % of Budget 11.0% 3.3% Public Safety Capital Equipment Budget 689,029 332,000 (399,674) 621,355 Actual 7,656 (368) 7,289 % of Budget 2.3% 0.1% TCAAP Budget 285,973 - - 285,973 Actual 983 983 % of Budget N/A N/A Cable TV. Franchise revenues are receipted quarterly, in the month following the end of the quarter (Apr, Jul, Oct, Jan). EDA. Tax revenues are collected twice a year (Jul, Dec). TIF. Interest Earnings. Equipment & Building. Timing of capital expenditures. Park. Interest Earnings. PIR. Timing of project expenditures. Public Safety Capital. Lake Johanna Fire Department new station project. TIF #255 & TCAAP. Fund deficits will be eliminated with future contributions, grants, and internal fund transfers, if needed CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENSES BUDGET AND ACTUAL FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2026 WATER FUND Percent Received or Expended Actual Actual Variance - Based on Annual Thru Thru Favorable Actuals Thru Budget 03/31/25 03/31/26 (Unfavorable) 03/31/26 REVENUES User charges $ 3,193,261 $ 718 $ 53,296 $ 52,578 7420.3 Connection charges 41,015 4,125 - (4,125) 0.0 Other 572,160 3,389 (1,320) (4,709) -38.9 Interest earnings - 10,873 8,692 (2,180) 79.9 TOTAL REVENUES 3,806,436 19,105 60,669 41,563 317.6 EXPENSES Personnel expenses 477,294 87,971 95,084 (7,113) 108.1 Supplies and materials 57,000 7,103 6,950 154 97.8 Other services and charges 436,845 26,039 81,593 (55,554) 313.4 Water purchases 1,748,000 206,383 125,345 81,038 60.7 Depreciation 380,801 - - - N/A Capital expenses 1,124,750 3,581 4,197 (617) 117.2 Debt service 248,150 - 236,275 (236,275) N/A TOTAL EXPENSES 4,472,840 331,076 549,444 (218,368) 166.0 Bond Proceeds - - - N/A Transfers out 100,000 N/A EXCESS (DEFICIT) REVENUES OVER EXPENSES $ (766,404) $ (311,971) $ (488,775) $ (176,805) 156.7 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENSES BUDGET AND ACTUAL FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2026 SEWER FUND Percent Received or Expended Actual Actual Variance - Based on Annual Thru Thru Favorable Actuals Thru Budget 03/31/25 03/31/26 (Unfavorable) 03/31/26 REVENUES User charges $ 2,735,504 $ 782 $ 40,246 $ 39,463 5144.5 Connection charges 30,980 2,415 - (2,415) 0.0 Other 14,897 540 29,298 28,758 5425.5 Interest earnings - 4,310 1,891 (2,419) 43.9 TOTAL REVENUES 2,781,381 8,047 71,434 63,387 887.7 EXPENSES Personnel expenses 566,895 108,009 110,720 (2,712) 102.5 Supplies and materials 21,500 204 2,435 (2,232) 1194.6 Other services and charges 334,635 25,128 65,482 (40,354) 260.6 Wastewater charges 1,056,625 332,491 352,208 (19,718) 105.9 Depreciation 230,110 - - - N/A Capital expenses 390,000 14,764 5,630 9,134 38.1 Debt service 39,350 - 37,525 (37,525) N/A TOTAL EXPENSES 2,639,115 480,595 574,001 (93,406) 119.4 Bond Proceeds - - - N/A Transfers out 126,000 N/A EXCESS (DEFICIT) REVENUES OVER EXPENSES $ 16,266 $ (472,548) $ (502,567) $ (30,019) 106.4 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENSES BUDGET AND ACTUAL FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2026 SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT FUND Percent Received or Expended Actual Actual Variance - Based on Annual Thru Thru Favorable Actuals Thru Budget 03/31/25 03/31/26 (Unfavorable) 03/31/26 REVENUES User charges $ 1,078,288 $ 823 $ 22,294 $ 21,471 2710.0 Other - - - - N/A Interest earnings - 3,133 4,785 1,653 152.8 TOTAL REVENUES 1,078,288 3,955 27,079 23,124 684.6 EXPENSES Personnel expenses 387,450 70,995 75,952 (4,956) 107.0 Supplies and materials 25,250 - - N/A Other services and charges 263,513 17,905 37,450 (19,545) 209.2 Depreciation 168,340 - - N/A Capital expenses 500,000 - - N/A TOTAL EXPENSES 1,344,553 88,901 113,402 (24,501) 127.6 Transfers out 74,000 - - N/A EXCESS (DEFICIT) REVENUES OVER EXPENSES $ (340,265) $ (84,945) $ (86,322) $ (1,377) 101.6 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS OTHER GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS BUDGET SUMMARY FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2026 BEGINNING FUND CASH BALANCE REVENUES EXPENDITURES NETCHANGE Water Budget 2,799,047 3,806,436 (4,572,840) 2,032,643 Actual 60,669 (549,444) (488,775) %of Budget 1.6% 12.0% Sanitary Sewer Budget 1,203,016 2,781,381 (2,765,115) 1,219,282 Actual 71,434 (574,001) (502,567) % of Budget 2.6% 20.8% Recycling Budget 318,499 358,533 (345,680) 331,352 Actual 807 (63,576) (62,769) % of Budget 0.2% 18.4% Surface Water Management Budget 1,158,957 1,078,288 (1,418,553) 818,692 Actual 27,079 (113,402) (86,322) % of Budget 2.5% 8.0% Risk Management Budget 211,221 200,000 (219,500) 191,721 Actual 421 (40,878) (40,457) % of Budget 0.2% 18.6% Engineering Budget 2,513 46,000 (46,000) 2,513 Actual 2,511 (3,899) (1,388) % of Budget 5.5% 8.5% Central Garage Budget - 212,750 (212,750) Actual 25,464 (30,243) (4,778) % of Budget 12.0% 14.2% Technology Budget 218,320 (218,320) Actual 73,146 (73,146) % of Budget 33.5% 33.5% Utility (601, 602, 604). Utility revenues are receipted quarterly, in the month following the end of the quarter (Apr, Jul, Oct, Jan) Recycling. Revenues are collected twice a year (Jul, Dec). Risk Mgmt. Property and Work Comp Insurance is booked in June of each year. Internal Service (726, 727, 728). Expenditures will be fully allocated and will have a zero balance at year-end. Attachment D CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA PERMIT DATA FOR BUILDING, HVAC AND PLUMBING FROM PERMITWORKS SOFTWARE FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2026 03/31/24 03/31/25 03/31/26 Building Permit Issued 58 80 Building Permit Fees 29,323 126,586 Building Plan Review Fees 11,875 63,158 TOTAL BUILDING FEES 41,197 189,744 Valuations of Projects 2,272,894 19,976,904 HVAC Permits Issued 54 44 HVAC Permit Fees 9,508 20,797 HVAC Plan Review Fees - - TOTAL HVAC FEES 9,508 20,797 Valuation of Projects 465,801 1,456,619 Plumbing Permits Issued 40 53 Plumbing Permit Fees 6,164 4,224 Plumbing Plan Review Fees - - TOTAL PLUMBING FEES 6,164 4,224 Valuation of Projects 419,194 229,364 TOTAL PERMITS ISSUED 152 177 TOTAL PERMIT FEES 56,869 214,764 TOTAL VALUATION OF PROJECTS 3,157,889 21,662,887 62 54,633 25,213 79,846 5,833,940 58 55,433 30,992 86,425 3,495,542 54 8,736 8,736 214,379 174 175,007 9,543,861 CONSENT ITEM - 8C 75 Years MEMORANDUM DATE: May 11, 2026 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Jessica Jagoe, City Administrator FROM: Julie Hanson, City Clerk/Assistant to the City Administrator SUBJECT: Summer Hours for City Hall beginning Tuesday, May 26, 2026 and concluding Friday, September 4, 2026 Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A Council Should Consider Motion to approve, table, or deny the following: • Summer hours for City Hall beginning the day following Memorial Day (Tuesday, May 26, 2026) and concluding the last workday prior to Labor Day (Friday, September 4, 2026) Backiround/Discussion The City has traditionally changed its hours to "summer hours" from the day following Memorial Day through the Friday prior to Labor Day. Traditional and proposed "summer hours" for City Hall are as follows: Traditional Hours Proposed Summer Hours City Hall 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. 7:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday — Friday Monday — Thursday and 7:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. on Friday Attachments None Page l of 1 CONSENT ITEM - 8D 75 Years MEMORANDUM DATE: May 11, 2026 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Jessica Jagoe, City Administrator FROM: David Swearingen, P.E. Public Works Director / City Engineer SUBJECT: Water System Interconnection Agreement for Fire Protection Services between Arden Hills and Mounds View Council Should Consider Motions to approve, table, or deny the following: System Interconnection Agreement for Fire Protection Services between Arden Hills and Mounds View. Back2round/Discussion The City of Mounds View previously served potable water to the Arden Hills DMV property at 5400 Rice Creek Parkway via a 10-inch watermain crossing Interstate Highway I-35W near County Rd H2. The DMV has since transferred the water service to the City of Arden Hills watermain. In order to maintain fire protection water flows in that area, the existing 10-inch watermain remained in place and repurposed as an emergency interconnect only to be used in the event of a fire. The Agreement (Attachment A) outlines the procedures for operating the emergency interconnect and terms for ownership and maintenance. Both cities have the authority to enter into this agreement pursuant to Minn. Statute, 471.59. Arden Hills Public Works recommends that the City Council approve Attachment A. The City of Mounds View City Council approved this agreement in July of 2025 as shown in Attachment A. The agreement was misplaced with Mounds View staff until a couple weeks ago which is why it is being brought to Arden Hills with a time delay. Page 1 of 2 Budget Impact The watermain infrastructure was constructed as a requirement as part of the Rice Creek Commons Outlot A development; therefore, there is no direct impact on the City's budget as it was included in the Development Agreement to be paid for by the Developer. Attachments Attachment A — Interconnect Agreement Page 2 of 2 Attachment A CITY OFARDEN HILLS CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW MUNICIPAL WATER SYSTEM INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT FOR FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 25 day of July, 2025, by and between the CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, a Minnesota municipal corporation, and the CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW, a Minnesota municipal corporation. WHEREAS, the City of Arden Hills and the City of Mounds View are adjoining cities; and WHEREAS, the above municipalities have and maintain municipal water systems; and WHEREAS, the City of Mounds View previously served potable water to the Arden Hills DMV property at 5400 Rice Creek Parkway, Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112, via ten -inch (10") water main crossing Interstate Highway 1-35W from or near County Road H2 in the City of Mounds View operated by a valve owned by the City of Mounds View; and WHEREAS, in the spirit of intergovernmental cooperation it is proposed that certain property located in the City of Arden Hills be permitted to connect to the municipal water system of the City of Mounds View for fire protection services only; and WHEREAS, the City of Arden Hills and the City of Mounds View have authority to enter into this Agreement pursuant to Minn. Stat, 471.59. NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties hereto as follows: 1. pity of Arden Fillfs to b_ eQ9nneCJed. The City of Arden Hills, County of Ramsey and State of Minnesota shall be permitted to connect to the municipal water system of the City of Mounds View for fire protection services only, upon the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement. 2. Interconnection to Mounds View Service. The City of Arden Hills shall be serviced by a twelve -inch (12") water main connected to the existing ten -inch (10") water main which was previously used to serve the Arden Hills DMV property. It is understood that the City of Arden Hills would bear responsibility of the existing ten -inch (10") watermain crossing Interstate Highway 1-35W from the new connection to the existing valve at or near County Road H2 in the City of Mounds View. The new connection shall be controlled by a valve, owned and operated by the City of Arden Hills and shall remain in the closed position and only opened in the event of a fire. 3. Limited Use of the Interconnection. The interconnection shall be used only in such situations which are deemed to be an emergency by the Lake Johanna Fire Department. Prior to the use of the interconnection, the City of Arden Hills must give notice to the City of Mounds View's Public Works Director that water supply is needed for fire protection and request that the City of Mounds View operate and open their valve at the interconnection. Then the City of Arden Hills shall operate and close their valves to isolate the Rice Creek Commons redevelopment site. After the emergency situation has ceased to exist, The City of Arden Hills shall operate and open their valves, then the City of Mounds View shall operate and close their valve and no further water shall be transferred. After the emergency situation has ceased to exist, the valves shall be returned to the closed position and no further water transferred. Unless usage of the water supply continues beyond a 48-hour period, Mounds View will not charge for the use of it's water supply. Where a water use charge is imposed, it shall be at a rate equal to the prevailing rate for usage by single family residential users in the City of Mounds View and in the amount agreed to by the City of Mounds View Public Works Director and the City of Arden Hills Public Works Director. 4. Maintenance of the Interconnection. The City of Arden Hills shall be responsible for the design, installation, use, maintenance and inspection of the interconnection. 5. Terms of -the Agreement. This Agreement shall become effective upon its approval date above for a period of one (1) year, and on that date shall be automatically renewable for the same term unless either party serves upon the other party a written notice of cancellation at least one hundred eighty (180) days prior to the automatic renewal date. 6. lndemnifi-Qation. The City of Arden Hills shall be responsible for determining that all applicable safety, building and fire codes have been met and continue to be met, and shall assume, protect, indemnify and hold the City of Mounds View, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents, harmless from and against any and all claims, actions, demands, liability, losses or lawsuits of any kind whatsoever, including reasonable attorney's fees, which arise out of, or occur in connection with, the Agreement, or the design, installation, use, maintenance and inspection of the connection and all related equipment and structures required to maintain the interconnection. This indemnification by the City of Arden Hills shall be deemed to include and protect against any act of negligence on the part of the City of Mounds View but shall not cover any deliberate or intentional action of the City of Mounds View which is beyond the control of the City of Arden Hills. 7. Effective Date. This Agreement shall become effective and binding upon the parties upon approval of the City Councils of the City of Arden Hills and the City of Mounds View. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by the proper officers who have been duly authorized by their City Councils to sign on behalf of the Cities and have caused their corporate seals to be affixed as the day and year written above. Lindstrom, Mayor Attest: , Nyl ikm d, City Administrator (seal) David Grant, Mayor Attest: Jessica Jagoe, City Administrator (seal) CONSENT ITEM - 8E 75 Years MEMORANDUM DATE: May 11, 2026 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Jessica Jagoe, City Administrator FROM: David Swearingen, P.E. Public Works Director / City Engineer SUBJECT: Old Highway 10 Trail Improvements -Settlement memorandum for Parcel 10 Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: $300,000 $81,642 PIR, MSA (Total ROW acquisition costs) Council Should Consider Motions to approve, table, or deny the following: Settlement memorandum for Parcel 10 related to the Old Highway 10 Trail Improvements Project Back2round/Discussion The City Attorney provided Attachment A as the settlement memorandum for Parcel 10 related to the Old Highway 10 Trail Improvements project. The reason for this settlement memo is the proposed design of the boardwalk structure along the Parcel 10 property causes a settlement amount higher than the certified appraised value for the necessary temporary easement to construct the structure. The Public Works Director / City Engineer determined the settlement amount is reasonable due to the given circumstances and Council approved the right-of-way acquisition and temporary easement costs for this project on April 27, 2026. Therefore, staff recommends the City Council approve the authorization for the signing of Attachment A. Budget Impact The settlement amount for Parcel 10 was included in the Council approved April 27, 2026 agenda item; therefore, this memorandum is not changing the existing conditions of the project budget as it relates to Right -of -Way acquisition costs. Attachments Attachment A — Parcel 10 Settlement Memorandum Page 1 of 1 Attachment A SETTLEMENT MEMORANDUM (Old Highway 10 Trail Project) This Settlement Memorandum ("Memorandum") is dated , 2026. Renee Marie Crumpton, a single person ("Owner"), owns the property located at 1680 Wedgewood Circle, Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112 and identified as Parcel Identification Number: 21.30.23.41.0015 ("Property"). The Owner did execute and deliver a conveyance of real estate rights, specifically a Temporary Construction Easement on the Property, to the City of Arden Hills, Minnesota ("City"). This Memorandum includes of all the terms, and the only terms, agreed upon in connection with the above transaction. It is hereby acknowledged and agreed upon between the parties that: 1. The City is engaged in a trail project along Old Highway 10 ("Project"). The Owner understands that the acquired property rights are for use in connection with the construction of the Project. 2. That in full compensation for the conveyance of said property rights, the City shall pay the Owner the following amounts: Easement Area Value Temporary Construction 607 sq. ft. $ 5,500.00 Easement Adjustment to address impacts n/a $19,500.00 to sight lines, view shed, and noise Settlement Total: $25,000.00 The payment shall be issued jointly to the Owner and Morphew Law Office, PLLC. 3. The Owner understands that payment by the City must await City Council approval. 4. In the event of a clerical error, the Owner agrees to cooperate in correcting the error including but not limited to resigning all documents. It is understood and agreed that the entire agreement of the parties is contained in this Memorandum and the Temporary Construction Easement dated , 2026, and that these documents and agreements include all oral agreements, representations, and negotiations between the parties. [The remainder of this page was intentionally left blank.] CITY: CITY OF ARDEN HILLS By: David Grant Mayor By: Julie Hanson City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) On this day of , 2026, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared David Grant and Julie Hanson to me personally known, who being each by me duly sworn, each did say that they are respectively the Mayor and the City Clerk of the City of Arden Hills, the Minnesota municipal corporation named in the foregoing instrument, and that it was signed on behalf of said municipal corporation by authority of its City Council and said Mayor and City Clerk acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said municipal corporation. Notary Public 2 OWNER: RENEE MARIE CRUMPTON STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF ) On this day of , 2026, before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared Renee Marie Crumpton to me personally known, who being by me duly sworn, each did say that she is the person named in the foregoing instrument. Notary Public CONSENT ITEM - 8F MEMORANDUM DATE: May 11, 2026 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Jessica Jagoe, City Administrator FROM: Jake Reilly, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Resolution 2026-026 Exercising the City's Authority to Opt -in to, and Support the Ramsey County Economic Development Agency (EDA) Budgeted Amount N/A Council Should Consider Actual Amount: N/A Motions to approve, table, or deny the following: Funding Source: N/A • Resolution 2026-026 Exercising the City's Authority to Opt -in to and Support the Ramsey County Economic Development Agency (EDA) Background/ Discussion Following the creation of enabling legislation by the State Legislature earlier in the year, on December 2, 2025, the Ramsey County Board of Commissioners took an initial step to formally create the Ramsey County Economic Development Authority (EDA). The Board took action to ask for legislation to create an EDA as part of its commitment to supporting entrepreneurs and small businesses in Ramsey County. The adoption of the legislation included two conditions: 1. The EDA will have no taxing authority. This was intentional, as the EDA will only receive and spend funding from the existing Ramsey County Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) levy. Expansion of the HRA to include EDA powers, as described by state statute, allows the county to utilize a portion of HRA levy funding for purposes of small business support and enhanced business programming. 2. To participate and benefit from the creation of this EDA, the legislature required that cities within the county choose whether to access the enhanced business programming and related financial assistance to be offered by this new body, by taking action to opt in to what the County refers to as, "enhanced business programming." Page 1 of 2 The effect of the legislation is to expand the list of eligible activities for which Ramsey County HRA levy funds may be used. There is no change in property taxes, and no new taxing authority. To fund the EDA-related programs, the County Board has set aside between $1.5M to $2M from the existing HRA levy for EDA-related programming/funding. A final budget will be set once the County knows how many cities have elected to participate. The cities that opt to participate will establish the EDA "Area of Operation," which must be established by the County no later than June 15, 2027. Cities must opt in no later than June 1, 2026 to be eligible for the enhanced business programming/funding that will be available as of January 1, 2027. The County has identified five core focus areas for enhanced business support and growth programming. These areas include: • Improve the capacity of Business Support Organizations • Expand technical assistance service offerings to businesses • Create new cohort -based learning opportunities • Establish data gathering, research & reporting capabilities • Provide direct support to projects and businesses that deliver business growth Financial assistance will likely help the City and its business community over the long term. While the County's existing portfolio of business programming (i.e. Open to Business, CEO Next, CEO Now, and RamseyCountyMeansBusiness.com) will remain unchanged in 2026, participation in the EDA is needed to access enhanced services beginning in 2027 and may be needed to access existing programming and services in future years. Budget Impact Opting into the EDA carries no immediate fiscal impact. However, there is the potential that access to an additional revenue/capital stream would provide a net positive budgetary impact by leveraging external revenue to complete essential projects associated with strategic planning initiatives surrounding economic development and business relations. Attachments Attachment A: Resolution 2026-026 Exercising the City's Authority to Opt -in to and Support the Ramsey County Economic Development Agency (EDA) Attachment B: Ramsey County EDA Implementation Next Steps — Memo from Ramsey County staff Attachment C: Ramsey County EDA FAQ — Prepared by Ramsey County Staff, March 2025 Page 2 of 2 A 1 prese11 nt-�, 4a Years b �j NON CITY OF ARDEN HILLS COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO.2026-026 A RESOLUTION EXERCISING THE CITY'S AUTHORITY TO OPT -IN TO, AND SUPPORT, THE RAMSEY COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY ("EDA") WHEREAS, the Commissioners of Ramsey County ("County") and the City of Arden Hills City Council ("City") consider small businesses to be the backbone of stability and growth for their respective local government and municipality; and WHEREAS, the County and the City also consider continued investment in small businesses as critical for sustaining stability and growth in their respective local government and municipality; and WHEREAS, the County sought special legislation from the State Legislature that expanded the eligible uses of the County's Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA); and WHEREAS, the special legislation, often referred to as the EDA Bill (Bill), expanded the use of HRA Levy funding to include entrepreneurship and business programming and necessitated the creation of the Ramsey County Economic Development Authority (EDA); and WHEREAS, the EDA Bill was approved by the Legislature in 2025; and WHEREAS, the EDA Bill contained two provisions, (1) the EDA would not have tax levy authority and (2) Cities within the County's HRA Area of Operation would be required to `Opt In' to business programming by the EDA; and WHEREAS, pursuant to state statute, projects funded with HRA levy will continue to require consent by the City; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Ramsey County Board of Commissioners Resolution B2025-229 dated December 2, 2025, and to filing with the Secretary of State a Certificate of Approval of Special Law By Governing Body (pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, 645.02 and 645.021) December 16, 2025, as Document No. 20254239, the County has legally established an EDA through which the above -referenced funds and programs supporting small business in the City may flow; and Page 1 of 2 WHEREAS, the City supports the County in promoting growth and sustainability for small businesses within its jurisdiction and therefore supports, and wishes to avail itself to, funding and programs made available by the County's EDA and deems it a positive mechanism for doing so. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City affirmatively "Opts -In" as a participant in the County's EDA Area of Operation, and supports the County in its EDA use, funding and programs established, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City commits to the collaboration with the County and the processes necessary for implementing the County's EDA programs as an integral part and shared goal of supporting and sustaining entrepreneurs and local small businesses. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS THIS 11tb DAY OF MAY, 2026. David Grant, Mayor ATTEST: Julie Hanson, City Clerk To view the final document, access adopted Resolutions via Arden Hills Public Laserfiche Weblink by visiting cityofardenhills.org and clicking on Archived Documents under Helpful Links on our main webpage. Page 2 of 2 M RAMSEY COUNTY Community & Economic Development Attachment B DATE: March 6, 2026 TO: Ramsey County City Administrators and Community Development Directors FROM: Josh Olson, Director, Community & Economic Development Department CC: Ling Becker, County Manager Kari Collins, Deputy County Manager, Economic Growth & Community Investment RE: Ramsey County EDA Implementation Next Steps Thank you for your ongoing support of the Ramsey County's housing and redevelopment programming. I look forward to the continued partnership in ensuring all in Ramsey County are valued and thrive. I am reaching out to provide you with information regarding the next steps to enhancing programming for entrepreneurs and small businesses as result of last year's approved `EDA Bill.' On December 2nd, 2025, the Ramsey County Board of Commissioners took an initial step to formally create the Ramsey County Economic Development Authority. This was a required first step, prior to the beginning of this year's legislative session, but it is the first of many steps required to allow enhanced business programming to be funded through the Ramsey County Housing and Redevelopment Authority levy. While the legislation allowed for the creation of the Ramsey County Economic Development Authority (EDA), it outlined two important conditions: 1. The EDA will have no taxing authority. This was intentional as the EDA will only receive and spend funding from the existing Ramsey County Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) levy. Expansion of the HRA to include EDA powers, as described by state statute, allows the county to utilize a portion of HRA levy funding for purposes of small business support and enhanced business programming. 2. Each City is required to `Opt In' to this enhanced business programming. `Opt -In' Process The process for a City to Opt -in requires a city resolution by June 1, 2026. Receipt of approved resolutions from cities will create a map that shows the EDA's Area of Operation. Ramsey County would then establish the EDA Area of Operation on or by June 15t", 2026. Enhanced business programming will begin January 1, 2027. A draft resolution for city council approval is provided below. Tentative Programming Tentative plans continue to plan for an allocation of $1.5 - $2 million yearly from the existing Housing and Redevelopment Authority levy towards business focused programming. Programming and total budget allocation have not yet been formalized as the County awaits 250 Courthouse 15 West Kellogg Blvd. Saint Paul, MN 55102 (651) 266-8010 i RamseyCountyMN.gov final decisions from cities regarding their intent to opt -in. While the approved EDA's Area of Operation is a critical consideration to determining the scale and scope of final programming, we have identified five core focus areas for enhanced business support and growth programming. These areas include (further details below): • Improve the capacity of Business Support Organizations • Expand technical assistance service offerings to businesses • Create new cohort -based learning opportunities • Establish data gathering, research & reporting capabilities • Provide direct support to projects and businesses that deliver business growth Please note: The County's existing portfolio of business programming (Open to Business, CEO Next, CEO Now, and RamseyCountyMeansBusiness.com) remains unchanged for this year. Please reach out if you would like to further discuss this process and/or tentative programming, including any additional questions. Lastly, while it is not expected, if you are able to communicate your council's intentions ahead of the June 1st deadline that would be appreciated. Proposed Core Programmatic Areas for Enhanced Business Programming Improve the Capacity of Business Support Organizations Business Support Organizations (BCOs) are important lifelines to entrepreneurs and small businesses. Any many instances BCOs are a first stop of businesses looking to get a business started, navigate regulatory and technical hurdles, and seek financing. As the County, we saw first-hand during recent crises and business interruptions that our BCOs require resources to effectively and proactively respond. The ongoing Business Reimagination Center initiative is piloting efforts in 2026 that support capacity of BCOs. This piloted effort will inform future programming. High Level Budget Estimate: $250,000 Expand Technical Assistance Service Offerings to Businesses Small businesses often seek a myriad of technical assistance services in order for them to growth and prosper. The County currently invests in the Open to Business program that offers no cost direct technical assistance and other forms of support to small business owners and entrepreneurs. Enhanced technical services support general business challenges like accounting, marketing, digital literacy and/or could support business sectors. The ongoing Business Reimagination Center initiative is also piloting new and enhanced technical services that will inform future programming. High Level Budget Estimate: $250,000 O Create New Cohort -Based Learning Opportunities Cohort -based learning programs like CEO Next and CEO Now allow business Ir leaders to learn with and alongside their peers. CEO Next and CEO Now are a r-7 regional partnership with Hennepin County. Hennepin County currently operates these programs. Ramsey County is exploring possibilities for Ramsey County only cohorts as well as cohorts serving business at different growth stages. High Level Budget Estimate: $250,000 Establish Data Gathering, Research & Reporting Capabilities A _ Data is everywhere, and it is increasingly playing a role in business growth and innovation. Decision making driven by robust data can create transformational impacts in assisting businesses in their growth, as well as support more robust and coordinated business retention, expansion and attraction efforts by the county and cities. High Level Budget Estimate: $250,000 Provide Direct Support to Projects and Businesses That Deliver Business Growth .' Accelerate business growth by providing direct, targeted support to projects and ll businesses with strong economic potential through mechanisms such as grants, low - interest loans, etc. High Level Budget Estimate: $1,000,000 M RAMSEY COUNTY Community & Economic Development Attachment C --VERSION 3/14/2025-- Statutory Change Expanding Use of Ramsey County Housing & Redevelopment Authority (HRA) SF 2521 (Hawj) HF 2349 (Lee) Small businesses are the backbone of Ramsey County. It's critical to our region that we continue to invest in our business community in the wake of the pandemic. Ramsey County seeks to amend the HRA statutory language to expand authority to better support diversifying industries, communities, and emerging entrepreneurs as best as possible. FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS Why is Ramsey County not just revising its Housing and Redevelopment Authority to include business programming as an allowable use? Why is establishment of an economic development authority included in this legislation? A: Ramsey County Housing and Redevelopment Authority is established under state statute. The state statute is narrowly worded to the support and funding of affordable housing and redevelopment projects and programs. Small business programming is defined as allowable uses with economic development authorities. Ramsey County does not currently have an economic development authority. Based on legal guidance, the proposed legislation expands the powers of the Ramsey County Housing and Redevelopment Authority through the establishment of an economic development authority. Will this legislative change result in a new property tax to Ramsey County property owners? A: No. This legislative change has no change on property taxes. This legislative change simply expands the list of eligible activities in which Ramsey County's Housing and Redevelopment Authority levy is used. The text change would additionally add programming for entrepreneurs and small businesses as an eligible use for the Ramsey County Housing and Redevelopment Authority levy. What is the county seeking from Ramsey County cities? If the legislation is successful, what is required from Ramsey County cities? A: The County does not require approval from Ramsey County cities for this proposed legislation. The County does however seek support from our cities for this legislation. If the legislation is successful, cities within the existing Ramsey County Housing and Redevelopment Authority area of operation will have the choice whether to: • Opt -in: A city that chooses to opt -in will receive the greatest flexibility of eligible programming. In addition to the current portfolio of affordable housing and redevelopment programing, business programing will be provided. City Councils will be asked to pass resolutions 'opting -in' by June 2025. With the first year of HRA levy funded business programming occurring in 2026. • Opt -out: A city that chooses to opt -out will continue to receive the current portfolio of affordable housing and redevelopment programing. The City of North Saint Paul is not to be a part of the Ramsey County Housing and Redevelopment Authority Area of Operation. There is no change to North Saint Paul as a result of this legislation. 250 Courthouse 15 West Kellogg Blvd. Saint Paul, MN 55102 651-266-8010 www.ramseycounty.us Ramsey County Housing & Redevelopment Authority What is the current levy of the Ramsey County Housing & Redevelopment Authority (HRA)? A: The 2024 HRA Levy is $12,595,222. HRA Levy spending maintains a directed parity of 50% of the levy spent within suburban Ramsey County and 50% within the city of Saint Paul. How is the Ramsey County Housing and Redevelopment Authority levy currently used? A: The Ramsey County HRA levy is in its third year of operation. Over the last two years, the general breakdown of HRA levy usage was (Avg. of 2022 & 2023): Housing Programing Redevelopment Programs Administration 73% 17% 1 10% Current suite of HRA levy programming Housing Programs Redevelopment Programs Affordable Housing infrastructure Investments Critical Corridors — Development + Infrastructure; FirstHome Down payment assistance Critical Corridors Suburban Commercial Corridor Initiative *Suburbs only* Emerging & Diverse Developers Program Critical Corridors Planning Site Assessment Grants ► HRA 2024 Annual Report —Highlights (3rd year of operation) Final Report is currently in production with a final version published in Q12025. General highlights to include: • Affordable Housing Investments. $6.5M of HRA levy obligated to affordable housing projects in 2024. • Emerging & Diverse Developers (EDD). Over 30 developers received technical assistance in 2024. County invested $2.4 million (HRA Levy only) into projects led by EDD. • FirstHome Down Payment Assistance. 46 closings in 2024. • Critical Corridors. Assisted 9 qualifying applicants/projects with $1.76 million in Housing & Redevelopment Authority levy funding for place -based investments in three core areas: pre - development planning, commercial corridor initiatives (suburban only) and development and infrastructure • Site Assessment Grants. Supported 16 projects with site investigation in 2024. ► HRA 2023 Annual Report —Highlights (2"d year of operation) • Affordable Housing Investments. $6.15M of HRA levy obligated to affordable housing projects in 2023. Across all funding streams, County invested in the construction of 1,365 new and 767 preserved rental housing units in 2023. Of the total, 988 were classified as deeply affordable for residents earning at or below 30% Area Median Income. • FirstHome Down Payment Assistance. Of the 27 closings, 25 were first -generation homebuyers. • Emerging & Diverse Developers (EDD). EDD is a two-part program initiated in second half of 2023. • Part A is provides technical assistance and cohort group learning to strengthen the pipeline of local emerging and diverse developers in real estate. 48 developers received technical assistance in 2023. • Part B is a solicitation for projects led by EDD. County invested $3.1 million (across all funding) into projects led by EDD. Critical Corridors. Assisted 10 qualifying applicants/projects with $2.1 million in Housing & Redevelopment Authority levy funding for place -based investments in three core areas: pre - development planning, commercial corridor initiatives (suburban only) and development and infrastructure Site Assessment Grants. Program initiated in late 2023. Supported one project in 2023. ► HRA 2022 Annual Report —Highlights (1st year of operation) • Affordable Housing Investments. $7.2M of HRA levy obligated to affordable housing projects in 2022. Across all funding streams, Ramsey County leveraged multiple funding sources in 2022 to bring dozens of affordable housing projects closer to realization and invested in the construction of 1,128 new rental housing units and preserved 1,029. Of the total, 571 are classified as deeply affordable for residents earning at or below 30% Area Median Income. • FirstHome Down Payment Assistance. In Fall 2022, County relaunched its down payment assistance program to better align with market realities and offer first-time and first -generation homebuyers with down payment assistance. $187,500 in down payment assistance loans disbursed in 2022. • Critical Corridors. Established in the Fall 2022, 14 grants in its first round of solicitations, totaling roughly $2.3 million in three core areas: pre -development planning, development and infrastructure, and commercial corridor initiatives. Will this change result in Ramsey County shifting its focus from supporting the preservation and expansion of deeply affordable housing? A: No. Ramsey County remains focused on the improving affordable housing infrastructure throughout the county. The MN Legislature made unprecedent investments in housing and housing infrastructure as part of the 2023 Legislative session. The Local Affordable Housing Aid (LAHA) or housing sales tax is estimated to bring resources comparable to that of the HRA levy. This additional funding for affordable housing allows for a slight adjustment of funding priorities of the HRA levy without deviating from the County's primary focus on expanding and improving affordable housing infrastructure. Who decides on funding priorities on HRA Levy? A: Ramsey County HRA Board is responsible for establishing funding priorities and make final decisions regarding spending of HRA levy. While the County HRA outlines its priorities, it relies on city partners as well as community organizations and developers to ready important projects. Prior to the county's funding in a project, projects are required obtain a municipal resolution in support in accordance with state statute. EDA and business programming What type of business activities does the County intend to do with this legislative change? A: The County is responding to community requests for enhanced business programming. The small business support (EDA eligible activities) realized by this legislative flexibility would be a strong reelection of those local requests and would initially start at $1.5 - $2 million of our yearly HRA levy to ensure the bulk of resources are remain available and prioritized for housing programs and projects. Funding will continue to align with HRA levy spending directives where 50% of HRA levy spending occurs in suburban Ramsey County and 50% with the City of Saint Paul. Areas of need identified to strengthen the small business ecosystem are informed by the County's involvement and engagement with cities, business support organizations and small businesses that include: ► opacity building of small business support organizations to meet current and future needs ► re technical assistance/advisory services to better serve targeted geographies, communities and/or industries ► dditional flexible capital to enable greater business retention, expansion and attraction Did the County attempt to form an EDA previously? A: During the 2024 Legislative Session, Ramsey County introduced proposed legislation amending HRA statutory language and establishing an EDA to allow for business programming to be an eligible use of Ramsey County HRA levy funding. HF 3784 (Lee) / SF 4655 (Hawj) was later amended based on feedback from cities. A redlined version, including a memo from the County Attorney's office describing the changes is available. The current draft version for the 2025 Legislative session of the bill reflects this city feedback in 2024. In 2016, the County did submit legislation that would have created a Ramsey County EDA. The legislation was pulled by the County following community concerns around the creation of a new taxing authority. The county's current legislation would not create a new taxing authority as it merely allows for additional eligible uses (i.e. business programming) of the County's existing Housing and Redevelopment Authority. Does Ramsey County provide business programming? If so, what programs? How much does it spend? And how does it pay for business programs? A: Ramsey County provides limited business programing. The County funds the programming through the County's general property tax levy. Current business programming totals $345,000. ► ntrepreneur support: Open to Business — Provides no cost direct technical assistance and other forms of support to small business owners and aspiring entrepreneurs. This program was expanded countywide in 2019 in response to direct city requests for this program. ► mall Business Growth: Ramsey County has two cohort -based leadership programs geared for established businesses. Both programs are a partnership with Hennepin County. • CEO Next — Group learning leadership program for CEOs/founders of second stage businesses that are growth -minded ($1M-50M in revenues, 10-99 employees, etc.) • CEO Now — Group learning leadership program for CEOs/founders of first stage businesses that are growth -minded ($250K-2M in revenues, more than one employee, operating for two years, etc.) Newly established in 2024. ► rketing & attraction programming: RamseyCountyMeansBusiness.com An online portal providing workforce and economic development resources throughout the county to current and prospective businesses and investors. This online portal went live in 2019 and was refocused during the pandemic as a central repository for covid business relief resources. A redesign of the portal is underway and will be live in early 2025. How do other metro counties support business programming and how did they obtain authority to provide economic development activities? A: Hennepin County received special legislation (MN Statute 383B.79) - A multijurisdictional reinvestment program is authorized involving Hennepin County, the Hennepin County Housing and Redevelopment Authority, and one or more of the following political subdivisions: the cities of Minneapolis, Brooklyn Center, and other interested statutory or home rule charter cities in Hennepin County, the Minneapolis Park Board, the Three Rivers Park District, and any watershed district entirely or partially located in Hennepin County. The multijurisdictional program may include plans for housing rehabilitation and removals, industrial polluted land cleanup, water ponding, environmental cleanup, community corridor connections, corridor planning, creation of green space, acquisition of property, development and redevelopment of parks and open space, water quality and lakeshore improvement, development and redevelopment of housing and commercial projects, economic development, and job creation. ► Hennepin County utilizes Housing and Redevelopment Authority funding for a variety of economic development programs including their CEO Next and Elevate Business platform. Due to the broader nature of this statute, this has limited applicability to Ramsey County. Dakota County has a Community Development Agency. Under MN Statute 383D.41, subdivision 7, After December 31, 1999, the Dakota County Housing and Redevelopment Authority shall be known as the Dakota County Community Development Agency. In addition to the other powers granted in this section, the Dakota County Community Development Agency shall have the powers of an economic development authority. ► A core focus of local Community Development Agencies (CDAs) is the ability to own and operate affordable housing. Ramsey County has expressed no interest in owning and operating affordable housing, so this the CDA statute has limited applicability to Ramsey County. Washington County has a Community Development Agency. In 2016, Washington County successfully sought special legislation to amend their Housing & Redevelopment Authority and created a Community Development Agency. Under MN Statute 383D.41, section 2, subdivision 2a, Request to handle economic development, housing, or redevelopment duties. The governing body of a statutory or home rule charter city or township with an existing municipal economic development authority may request the Washington County Community Development Agency to handle the economic development, housing, or redevelopment duties of the authority and, in such an event, the Washington County Community Development Agency shall act and have exclusive jurisdiction for economic development, housing, or redevelopment duties in the statutory or home rule charter city or township pursuant to the provisions of the Economic Development Authorities Act, Minnesota Statutes, sections 469.090 to 469.1081. ► A core focus of local Community Development Agencies (CDAs) is the ability to own and operate affordable housing. Ramsey County has expressed no interest in owning and operating affordable housing, so this the CDA statute has limited applicability to Ramsey County. Scott County and Carver County each have a Community Development Agency. CDA's provide the most diverse array of eligible programing for housing, redevelopment and economic development uses. Other questions: JENNIFER O'ROURKE JOSH OLSON Director of Government Relations Director of Community & Economic Development 651-366-7276 651-295-0370 iennifer.orourke@ramseycounty.us iosh.olson@ramseycountv.us