Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-27-26-R 75 YeA,rs Approved: May 11, 2026 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 27, 2026 7:00 P.M. -ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor David Grant called to order the regular City Council meeting at 7:00 p.m. Present: Mayor David Grant, Councilmembers Brenda Holden, Tena Monson, Emily Rousseau and Kurt Weber Absent: None Also present: City Administrator Jessica Jagoe; City Attorney Cynthia Kirchoff; Public Works Director/City Engineer Dave Swearingen; Finance Director Joua Yang; Community Development Director Jacob Reilly;and Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk Julie Hanson PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Councilmember Holden requested Item I and Item J be pulled from the Consent Calendar and be discussed as Items 9A and 9B. MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Monson seconded a motion to approve the meeting agenda as amended. The motion carried (5-0). 2. TCAAP/RICE CREEK COMMONS UPDATE City Administrator Jagoe stated the Joint Development Authority and neither of the advisory committees have met since the last Council meeting. The next JDA meeting will be on Wednesday, April 291h at 5:30. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—APRIL 27, 2026 2 Councilmember Holden asked for an update on the PFAS study. City Administrator Jagoe reported she has been in contact with Ramsey County and understood the County received a copy of this study last week. She indicated there were other agencies that have a review period of the draft report, over the next 30 days, and after this time the study would be made public. Councilmember Holden stated she received several calls from residents about the transparency of the Advisory Committee, and they questioned why the public cannot attend the Advisory Committee meetings. City Administrator Jagoe explained the Advisory Committee meetings are not public. She reported this group is made up of one JDA Councilmember, one JDA County Commissioner and staff members. She noted the Advisory Committee meetings are considered working meetings, updates are provided from staff and feedback is provided from the JDA members. She stated high level notes from these meetings are posted on the City's website. Mayor Grant commented if the Advisory Committee were to allow residents to attend meetings, there was no law against this. City Administrator Jagoe stated she was not aware of a law that would prohibit this. 3. PUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL Kathy Sukke, 1286 Karth Lake Circle, stated in 2022 Arden Hills elected a group of candidates that ran as a slate. These candidates were Tena Monson, Emily Rousseau and Tom Fabel. She reported these individuals thought alike, voted alike and did not have independent ideas. She indicated this group ripped up the City Charter in order to give themselves powers, stacked the JDA with newbies that seemed to get their money and marching orders from outside this small city. She explained Ramsey County had sued the City in 2019 over density and refused mediation, then got 460 additional units in the fall of 2023. She reported Emily Rousseau stacked the Planning Commission as this group was heard gloating about the passage of the affordable housing zoning item at the April 8 Planning Commission meeting. She stated when Commissioner Jacobson asked how this happened the comment was Emily Rousseau. She understood that people with differing views from Emily Rousseau were ousted or wasted their time applying. She stated this was not very inclusive. She reported the slate 2.0 with Kurt Weber, along with the rest of the JDA has made a mess of TCAAP. She explained the JDA was now being sued by the developer. She indicated the JDA has proposed working with multiple developers, which was a concern, and Ramsey County has announced a $70 million infusion to build the spine road when none of this project has been settled. She believed the spine road should not begin until pollution and developer concerns have been addressed. She commented further on the pollution concerns surrounding Building 116. She explained this building sits where the Town Center was to be placed. She indicated at the November 2, 2025 JDA work session, Kurt Weber questioned "why this was the first time he was hearing this". She reported Kurt Weber was elected by just four votes in 2024 over Dave Radziej, noting these votes were counted by Ramsey County that had sued the City. She encouraged Kurt Weber to read the important documents regarding the unresolvable pollution issue. She recommended the JDA stop referring to the main thoroughfare as the spine road until all of the issues have been resolved and the JDA had a developer in place. She reported Arden Hills wants Councilmembers ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—APRIL 27, 2026 3 that will work for the City who value the community as it is and noted Arden Hills should not be a mini St. Paul. Chris Hughes, 3515 Snelling Avenue North, stated he appreciated the"slate".He reported the slate has been treated like a four letter word and noted he was appreciative of the slate. He feared where the City would be without them when it comes to taxes and Rice Creek Commons. He explained he was grateful that the Council has found a way to pass legislation that makes sense for Arden Hills. 4. RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIES None. 5. PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS A. Twin Cities North Chamber of Commerce Mike Dvorak, President of the Twin Cities North Chamber of Commerce, introduced himself to the Council and explained he replaced John Connelly last year as the President of the Chamber. He thanked the City for their continued partnership with the Chamber of Commerce. He reported the goal of the Chamber was to promote business, connect communities and develop leaders. He commented on the board and governance of the Chamber noting the Chamber currently has 300 members. He discussed the programs and events the Chamber sponsored which included Business Connects, engagement and networking events, public policy forums, along with promotional activities for community events, business openings and a career fair. He indicated the Chamber would be promoting the City's 75 h Anniversary celebration which would be held on Friday, July 17 from 4:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. at Cummings Park. He described how the Chamber would be embracing growth through transformation through new opportunities,creating new revenue streams and programs, by changing the narrative, and creating a Young Professionals Network. He spoke further to the concerns facing Minnesota at this time, commented on how he would be working to grow the Chamber in the coming years, and asked for comments or questions from the Council. Councilmember Holden asked of the Chamber would still be holding the auctions. Mr. Dvorak commented the Chamber will continue holding auctions, noting the spring auction was held last week. He discussed how these events assist with raising money for the Chamber while involving local businesses. Councilmember Holden encouraged the Chamber to reach out to the manufacturing/warehousing businesses Round Lake area. Councilmember Rousseau reported the EDC discussed the last Chamber event and encouraged the Chamber to have more time for networking. She suggested the Chamber consider holding town hall meetings in each sector and consider sponsoring an internship program. She stated one of the EDC members is employed at Bethel University and she might be able to assist in finding possible candidates for the internship program. Mr. Dvorak indicated he was interested in starting an internship program. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—APRIL 27, 2026 4 Mayor Grant stated the City was proud to be a member of the Twin Cities North Chamber of Commerce. He thanked Mr. Dvorak for all he does to promote the businesses in the City of Arden Hills. 6. STAFF COMMENTS A. Transportation Update Public Works Director Swearingen reported Ramsey County's ADA/pedestrian ramp work has begun on County Road E. He noted this work was expected to be completed by Friday, May 8 at which time pavement work would begin. Public Works Director Swearingen discussed the MNDOT improvements that would be completed on Highway 51/Snelling Avenue from Highway 36 to Gray Fox Road. Public Works Director Swearingen explained Xcel had begun work within the City's PMP project area. He indicated the contractor will begin with watermain improvements along Highway 96 in the coming weeks which may require one lane of east bound traffic to be closed. He noted the contractor would also begin hardcourt reconstruction at Arden Manor Park and the ADA improvements at Arden Oaks Park. He stated the City will be sending out letters to the impacted property owners to attend an informational open house on Wednesday, May 13 at City Hall from 5:00 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. Councilmember Holden requested the roadway near the swamp/railroad crossing be addressed during the mill and overlay project. Councilmember Weber indicated at the last meeting there was confusion regarding a memo from City staff. He explained he asked for an item to be placed on this agenda in order to provide clarification on the memo and he was told now would be the appropriate time to ask for clarification. Mayor Grant asked why Councilmember Weber did not ask for an item to be added to the agenda prior to the agenda being approved. Councilmember Weber stated he clarified with staff prior to this meeting that this was the appropriate time to ask staff, during Staff Comments, to speak to this matter. Councilmember Holden commented this was another"gotcha". Councilmember Weber stated that Councilmember Holden's response was completely inappropriate, that he had asked for this item to be on the agenda at the last Council meeting and clarified with staff prior to the meeting that this was the time to bring it up. He stated it appears this was something the Mayor did not want to talk about. Comments to had not added an Item B under Staff Councilmember Holden questioned why staff d address Councilmember Weber's concern. City Administrator Jagoe explained in preparation for the agenda for this meeting she shared with the City Attorney that she should be prepared to provide clarification on the memo she prepared with regard to the Consent Agenda item order. She noted Councilmember Weber asked prior to the ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—APRIL 27, 2026 5 meeting why this item was not on the agenda and she said she indicated to the City Attorney that a question would be coming from City Council. She indicated the City Attorney was ready to speak to this matter and apologized for not placing this item on the agenda under Staff Comments. She stated she had the understanding this item would be addressed under the approval of the agenda. Mayor Grant reported as chair of the meeting that this item will not be discussed as part of the Transportation Update. However, he indicated this matter could be addressed under Item 13 which was for Council/Staff Comments. Councilmember Holden asked when the gas line work being done by Xcel Energy would be completed. Public Works Director Swearingen explained the Xcel Energy gas line work would take 12 weeks to complete. MOTION: Councilmember Weber moved and Councilmember Monson seconded a motion to suspend the rules for the purpose of adding an item to the agenda, Item 6B to allow for Discussion of Staff Memo. Councilmember Monson asked for clarification on what can be done if the rules were suspended. City Attorney Kirchoff explained there would be a vote to suspend the rules and if this motion passes, then a vote could be taken to add Item 6B to the agenda. A roll call vote was taken. The motion carried (5-0). B. Discussion of Staff Memo Mayor Grant reported he provided the City Attorney with an attachment prior to this meeting, which was from the Minnesota Parliamentarian's Association President regarding this topic. Councilmember Weber requested the City Attorney provide clarification and speak to the staff memo that she prepared of which was provided to the City Council. City Attorney Kirchoff stated several weeks ago she drafted a memo in response to very specific questions regarding Roberts Rules of Order. She reported the City of Arden Hills abides by Roberts Rules of Order except as amended by City Code. She commented one of the questions she was asked was what was the procedure to request an item be pulled from the Consent Calendar. She summarized what was in Roberts Rules of Order, noting Roberts Rules of Order does not necessarily apply to city councils, but provides for Consent Calendars. She explained consent calendars typically have items that are approved under one motion without discussion. She commented Roberts Rules of Order does not require a vote or motion to remove an item from the Consent Calendar. She indicated when the chair asks for a motion to approve the Consent Calendar, an item could be removed without needing a separate vote, and a motion could then be made on the remaining Consent Calendar items. The item that was pulled could then be addressed under Pulled Consent Items. She stated this was a very basic opinion on this matter. She explained the City does not have any rules of procedure that was adopted but has a section in City Code Section 210.04 entitled Rules of Procedure that states the City has approved Roberts Rules of Order revised. Presumably, the City has adopted the 12th Edition. She reported the City does have a rule about ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—APRIL 27, 2026 6 amending or suspending the rules, which requires a majority vote. She indicated the Council could adopt rules of procedure by code or resolution. City Attorney Kirchoff indicated the second question that was posed to her was how the City could amend something that has already been approved. She noted there were three ways to accomplish this under Roberts Rules of Order. She stated the first option would be to make a motion to reconsider. She reported a motion to reconsider has to be made at the same meeting an item was acted on. She explained once a meeting was adjourned the Council could not make a motion to reconsider an item that was already approved at a future meeting. She commented the second way to amend something that was approved was to make a motion to rescind or a motion to amend. She indicated these were essentially the same procedure, noting a member of the body could make a motion to rescind or amend an item that has already been approved. She reported a member would have to make a motion to add an item to the next agenda, which would give the city clerk notice to add this item to a future agenda. She explained the Council could also ask the city clerk or give notice that they would like a particular item added to the agenda before the agenda was posted. She reported notice would then be given to the body that a motion to rescind would be added to the agenda. She noted the third way to amend something that has already been approved would be to make a motion at a meeting when nothing else is pending. She indicated a motion to rescind, if approved, would mean the previous action did not happen. She commented a motion to amend, if approved, would amend the previous action. Mayor Grant stated this item was brought up after appointments were made to a City board. He recalled that appointments could not be rescinded after appointments were approved. He indicated if this were to come again, he should rule the matter out of order. City Attorney Kirchoff reported this was the case. Councilmember Weber stated the memo from staff did not reflect this. Mayor Grant reported the memo did reflect this under the rescind section. He explained this was an interesting topic and noted he went back to the Minnesota State Association of Parliamentarians. He noted he spoke with the President on this topic and reported he provided the City Attorney with a response from the President regarding this matter. He indicated the opinion of the State Association of Parliamentarians President was that it was the City's custom for the past 25 years that an agenda was approved and when the agenda was approved, the items within the Consent Calendar are set. He reported within Roberts Rules of Order a member can pull an item from the Consent Calendar and items can also be added to the agenda prior to the approval of the agenda. He stated it was the opinion of the Parliamentarians that action can be done this way for the good of the order as a long standing custom. He commented if the Council does not want to do things in this order, a change could be made, but based upon their determination, that was the City's custom and the custom was to be followed. He indicated there were organizations that do things slightly different than Roberts Rules of Order depending on how the group operates. He understood some Councilmembers were newer than others, but this was the manner in which the agenda was approved with items added or removed and the Consent Calendar was set. He explained this then allowed the Council to dispense with the matters at hand. He clarified that the President is not an attorney, does not give legal advice,but rather was a parliamentarian. Councilmember Weber stated he just heard the Mayor tell the Council what the City's custom is or has been for the past 25 years and then attributed this custom to the letter he received without ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—APRIL 27, 2026 7 giving any detail to what the letter says. He reported this custom flies in the face of Roberts Rules of Order. He asked if at any point during the Consent Calendar, according to Roberts Rules of Order, a councilmember wanted to pull an item up until the point of the vote,do they have the right to do that. City Attorney Kirchoff clarified the memo drafted by her office did not discuss a custom of a body. She indicated her memo addressed what is a Consent Calendar and how to amend items that were previously adopted. She explained she had not read the memo from the Mayor. She reported if the Mayor, acting as the chair of the meeting,was asking does someone want to pull an item from the agenda,that was the time for a Councilmember to make an opinion known. She stated there was a time when it became too late and the Councilmember has lost the ability to pull something from the Consent. Councilmember Weber stated he appreciated this opinion. He pointed out that according to the agenda, the Mayor does not ask what he would like removed. Rather, the Mayor asks if the Council would like to approve the agenda and then items are pulled. He stated it was assumed by this Mayor that by approving the agenda that the items on the Consent Calendar were set. He indicated he has done some parliamentarian reading himself and noted the Consent Calendar was viewed as members of a body giving up their right to review something and this was an exceptional situation that requires exceptional lenience. He supported the Council having the right to pull an item, even if this was being done at the last minute because information comes to light all the time. Councilmember Holden noted she pulled two items from the Consent Calendar for this meeting. She indicated she was hearing that the City Council meetings were too long and things were not being accomplished. She reported this topic has already been addressed for over one-half hour. She did not understand why this was becoming so complicated. She noted all Councilmembers were able to add or pull items from the agenda prior to the approval of the agenda. She understood a Councilmember believed the wrong people were appointed to a committee and a motion to rescind was requested. She stated this was the bottom line. She indicated there was a great deal of time being wasted, when items could simply be added or removed prior to the agenda being approved. She asked if the City Administrator recalled Councilmember Weber making a request to receive a copy of Roberts Rules of Order at a previous meeting. She recalled staff sending an email asking if the City Council wanted a copy of Roberts Rules of Order and no one responded. She inquired if Councilmember Weber received a copy of the rules per his request. City Administrator Jagoe reported a book was purchased for Councilmember Weber. Mayor Grant commented it was stated the Mayor did not ask for corrections or additions to the agenda before approving the agenda. He explained since 2010, when he was elected as Mayor, he has asked, under the approval of the agenda at the start of the meeting, are there any corrections or additions to the agenda. He reported if anyone wanted an addition to the agenda all a member had to do was ask. He indicated this has been the Council's custom for his entire time (25 years) on the Council. He noted the memo he provided to the City Attorney from the parliamentarian could be provided to the entire Council. He indicated changes could be made, but noted custom has precedence for meetings and the group was advised to move forward in the same manner unless the group wanted to make changes. Councilmember Weber indicated the last two comments made by Councilmember Holden and Mayor Grant twisted his words. He stated there was never a motion to rescind as suggested by ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—APRIL 27, 2026 8 Councilmember Holden, rather there was a motion to reconsider with the purpose of reevaluating the Mayor's methodology. He stated there was never an issue with the individuals selected, but rather there was concern with the methodology. He commented the Mayor just now twisted his words, noting that the Mayor did not ask if there were any changes to the Consent Calendar but asked if there were any changes or corrections to the agenda. He indicated this was more general and was not a reference to the Consent Calendar directly. He reported if the issue was that the new Councilmembers don't know their way around, a bit of grace could be offered. Councilmember Holden stated if the Mayor asks if there are any changes to the agenda the Consent Calendar was within the agenda. She indicated the twisting of words always happens to Councilmember Weber by the bad guys on the Council. She commented she believed it was ridiculous that the twisting only goes one way. She discussed how it was important to follow a process when it came to approving, removing or adding items to the agenda in order to keep the public informed on when items will be discussed. She encouraged the Council to stop nitpicking and to try and move on. Mayor Grant explained he would be standing by previous comments, noting he always asks for corrections or additions to the agenda. He stated he has done this for the past 15 years and Councilmembers are able to add items or correct the agenda. He indicated once the agenda is approved it was approved from top to bottom, including the Consent Calendar. Councilmember Holden asked if the City Administrator should go back and read through the previous minutes to see if a motion to rescind or recess was requested. She stated she was sick of this topic being brought up over and over again. Mayor Grant supported this recommendation. 7. APPROVAL OF MINUTES None. 8. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Motion to Approve Consent Agenda Item - Claims and Payroll B. Motion to Approve Ordinance 2026-009 Amending Chapter 3 of the Arden Hills City Code to Create a Tree Service License C. Motion to Approve Amended 2025-27 Collective Bargaining Agreement for Central Pension Fund Contribution D. Motion to Approve Appointment of Building and Code Enforcement Inspector E. Motion to Authorize Purchase of Residential Recycling Carts from Cascade Engineering F. Motion to Accept Resignation of Kate Olson from the Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee (PTRC) G. Motion to Approve Resolution 2026-025 Appointing Clara Bitzer to the Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee H. Motion to Approve Professional Engineering Services Proposal from I&S Group, Inc. —Chatham Trail Area and Miscellaneous Storm Sewer Improvements ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL-APRIL 27, 2026 9 h Metion to Approve-C-eoper-ative Agreement with the-Gity of Roseville Hamline Avenue Watefffiain and Trail o 0 nts (Between Getmty Rd G and Snelling Avenue) d. M4tion toRight of Way n equisit}en and Tempsrai=y Easement Costs Old MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Monson seconded a motion to approve the Consent Calendar as amended and to authorize execution of all necessary documents contained therein. The motion carried(5- 9. PULLED CONSENT ITEMS A. Motion to Approve Cooperative Agreement with the City of Roseville - Hamline Avenue Watermain and Trail Improvements (Between County Road C and Snelling Avenue) Councilmember Holden explained she had received a number of questions from residents and indicated she would like to know where the trail would be located. Public Works Director Swearingen reviewed the location of the Hamline Avenue trail within this improvement project. He noted Roseville's goal was to complete a loop around Lake Josephine and Arden Hills had a small segment included in this project. Councilmember Holden asked if the trail area off Lydia would be addressed so the trail would not be underwater. Public Works Director Swearingen commented grading work would be completed to address this concern. Councilmember Weber commented on how the water line would be increased from 12" to 16" through this project. He questioned if HDPE lines would be cheaper for the water lines. Public Works Director Swearingen stated this material line would allow the contractor to receive pricing for HDPE or iron pipe. He indicated Roseville would prefer the project to be completed with ductal iron pipe(DIP). He reported he does not anticipate the bid for the project would change. MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Rousseau seconded a motion to Approve Cooperative Agreement with the City of Roseville - Hamline Avenue Watermain and Trail Improvements Between County Road C and Snelling Avenue). The motion carried (5-0). B. Motion to Approve Right-of-Way Acquisition and Temporary Easement Costs -Old Highway 10 Trail Improvements Councilmember Holden reported she received calls from two residents on this project asking where the right-of-way acquisitions would occur. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—APRIL 27, 2026 10 Public Works Director Swearingen explained there were four different properties on the west side of Old Highway 10 that required permanent or temporary easement. Councilmember Weber commented on how there was a cost share agreement in place between the City and County. He asked if the City would be receiving a refund for any project costs. Public Works Director Swearingen reported the cooperative agreement with the County has not been drafted and noted it was his intent to have all project and right of way acquisition costs split according to any cost share agreement. MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Rousseau seconded a motion to Approve Right-of-Way Acquisition and Temporary Easement Costs —Old Highway 10 Trail Improvements. The motion carried (5-0). 10. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Planning Case 26-006 — Amending City Code Chapter 13 — Zoning Code Related to Requirements for Affordable Housing Community Develo ment Director Reilly stated in the fall of 2025 the City Council requested y q P Y housing policy for new residential developments in the City staff begin developing an affordable g p y p Y of Arden Hills. Staff prepared several presentations about the history of and existing market conditions related to construction, cost, and affordability of new housing in the nation, state of Minnesota, the Twin Cities metropolitan region, Ramsey County and Arden Hills. At the October 2025 work sessions,the City Council received information about affordable housing in Arden Hills and the housing market nationwide. The memos detailed root causes of the nationwide housing crisis, the effect specific to Arden Hills and potential solutions. Community Development Director Reilly explained the City of Arden Hills Planning Commission has review and recommendation authority over proposed changes to Chapter 13 — Zoning Code and held a public hearing at the April 8, 2026, regular meeting of the Planning Commission. Four residents commented at the public hearing. Staff received one written comment. The commission recommended approval of Ordinance 2026-007 as amended by the Planning Commission by a 7-0 vote. Community Development Director Reilly reported for context, Arden Hills' home values and rents are higher than surrounding communities, driven in part by limited net tax capacity, limited transit options,demand for homes within the Mounds View School District,and constrained supply. Arden Hills homeowners have the benefit of paying lower property taxes than owners of similarly valued homes in neighboring cities. Community Development Director Reilly explained at the December 8, 2025, and January 12, 2026, work sessions, the City Council received additional information about local housing market dynamics and discussed various approaches to increasing the supply of affordable places to live in Arden Hills. That information focused on three market-driven, largely no-cost approaches to increasing Arden Hills' housing supply, set in the context of the affordable housing needs the Metropolitan Council estimates Arden Hills must accommodate by 2050, or 221 households earning not more than 60% of AMI (approximately $79,400/year). At the January 12, 2026, City ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—APRIL 27, 2026 11 Council work session, staff were directed to bring back a draft ordinance or policy to address requiring affordable units in project proposals. Community Development Director Reilly stated a draft ordinance tailored to Arden Hills' market conditions was developed for discussion purposes. Both new residential construction and rehabilitation of existing multi-family homes are included in the ordinance which is intended to be market-sensitive, avoid negative impacts to the tax base, and address stated concerns about community character. Following discussion and some revisions to draft language at the February 9, 2026, City Council work session, staff were directed to bring a draft to the Planning Commission for public hearing. Community Development Director Reilly provided further information on the discussion that was held at the Planning Commission meeting. He recommended the Council strike the second paragraph on Page 4 in Attachment A as the language identifies a fee in lieu but there is not a matching paragraph establishing a location for those funds to go. Staff will bring the concept back at a later date. Staff offered the following Findings of Fact: • The City of Arden Hills is proposing to amend ordinance language for Chapter 13 —Zoning Code by adding Section 1320.16 Requirements for Affordable Housing. • The proposed ordinance is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan policies to: o Encourage the incorporation of affordable and life-cycle housing into new development and redevelopment where feasible. o Identify programs, policies, and strategies that encourage aging in community for senior citizens. • The health, safety, and economic welfare of present and future residents of Arden Hills depends on the availability of housing choices affordable to people and families at various income levels, including those earning less than 80% of Area Median Income. • Stable, safe, and affordable housing provides measurable health and economic benefits for individuals, families, and the community as a whole. • There is a demonstrated need to encourage the development of affordable housing for Arden Hills' workforce and families. • New residential development can accommodate demand for affordable housing for service workers, teachers, public safety personnel, and other essential community members. • The preservation of naturally occurring affordable housing (NOAH) is critical as market pressures increase rents and threaten the displacement of existing affordable units. • Economic integration of affordable housing within market-rate developments creates diverse, stable neighborhoods and prevents the concentration of poverty and the concentration of wealth. • Amendments to the Zoning Code regulations require a public hearing prior to action by the City Council. • The Planning Commission held the required public hearing on April 8, 2026. Community Development Director Reilly requested the City Council hold a public hearing at this time. Councilmember Weber asked if the density bonuses work with preexisting density bonuses, as was offered within the North Heights senior project. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—APRIL 27, 2026 12 Community Development Director Reilly explained this offers a slightly less aggressive density bonus for projects proposing affordable housing within their projects. He stated the North Heights senior project could have been allowed to go up to 40 units per acre, which was 100% more than was allowed. He noted the proposed language would allow for up to 30 units per acre. Councilmember Weber inquired if this was an either/or and would developers be able to apply the density bonus in any manner to a project. Community Development Director Reilly reported this was correct. Councilmember Rousseau stated the Planning Commission suggested the language brought forward align with Shoreview. She questioned how the language was working for the city of Shoreview. Community Development Director Reilly indicated staff has some understanding on how this policy was working. He reported there were three projects built prior to the adoption of the policy that voluntarily included affordable housing in part for a financial subsidy from the city. He commented the subsidy was approximately $140,000 per unit, which was far less than the average subsidy required to produce multi-family units in the metro area. He stated the average subsidy was in the range of$300,000 per unit. He explained after adoption of this policy, Shoreview has added more units and has not had any issues working with developers. He noted Shoreview does have more financial resources available to them than the City of Arden Hills does. He reported Shoreview was satisfied with the outcomes that they have had. Councilmember Rousseau questioned if it was necessary to require age restricted developments (55+) to have one three bedroom or larger unit. Community Development Director Reilly commented this has not been a standard but noted many of the 55+ properties had tenants that were still working and there was a demonstrated need in the market for three-bedroom units. Mayor Grant clarified this ordinance amendment would apply to the area in Arden Hills minus the area known as Rice Creek Commons. Community Development Director Reilly reported this was the case. Mayor Grant indicated he did not see this clearly called out within the document. He asked if this was because Rice Creek Commons has the TRC and the remainder of the City follows City Code. Community Development Director Reilly indicated this was correct. Mayor Grant spoke further to the affordability requirements for rehabilitated or renovated units. Mayor Grant opened the public hearing at 8:53 p.m. Kathy Sukke, 1286 Karth Lake Circle, reported there was no public notice of this item. She indicated the April 8 Planning Commission meeting was rather recent, by the slate 2.0's design. She stated affordability sounds so nice but encouraged all residents to ask the question affordability for whom and to whom. She explained 60% of all homeowners in the country have most of their ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—APRIL 27, 2026 13 wealth in their home. She feared that the proposed massive zoning change would impact the value of homes and livability in the northern section of the City, where TCAAP looms with 5,000 people being added to the community and North Heights would be adding 1,200. She reported the addition of 6,200 people would be an assault. She recommended action on this item be tabled or denied until there was transparent and unambiguous public scrutiny. She stated she wanted to better understand how northern Arden Hills would be impacted by an additional 6,200 residents. She was irritated by how the County was proposing a roundabout at TCAAP. She asked that the City speak with the County regarding this matter. She was of the opinion this was an ambiguous document, noting northern Arden Hills has 470 townhouses that qualify for purchase assistance and 280 mobile homes that sit near the arsenal site that were low income. She explained Arden Hills also has apartment complexes in the community. She said the proposed document gave too much power to too few. She stated affordability was utter propaganda given that there has been 25% inflation in the last five years. She indicated the State of Minnesota treats taxpayer money with complacency and willful ignorance, which meant the City and its residents will be taxed for those mistakes to the tune of billions of dollars. She recommended this document not move forward until the Council provides transparency and clarity answer the question of affordability for whom and from whom. Lynn Diaz, 1143 Ingerson Road, stated there was a growing housing crisis and half of renters were cost burdened. She encouraged the City to care about the community and help alleviate this problem. She reported of the eight suburbs, the City was considering the weakest and lowest ordinance. She indicated this was very disappointing. She asked that the Council be leaders when it comes to affordable housing. She discussed how Roseville had added 500 affordable units in recent years and Arden Hills has not added a single affordable unit through the three senior housing developments. She encouraged the City Council to ditch the 80%AMI option. She reported teachers could only afford to live in a one-bedroom apartments at 50% AMI and seniors living on a fixed income would fall into the 30% AMI bracket. She recommended the Lexington Avenue corridor be zoned for affordable housing only. She believed this was the perfect location to develop affordable housing at 60% AMI or below. She urged the City to not lose the opportunity to have meaningful affordable housing in Arden Hills. Steve Erler, 1704 Chatham Avenue, stated he was a member of the Planning Commission but was speaking his own opinions. He reported since 2020 the City has added approximately 200 housing units of senior housing in two separate developments. He indicated another development was coming near North Heights Church that would add another 200 units. He commented it was a good thing to be adding new units to the community but he questioned why affordability was not considered within any of these projects. He stated the North Heights developer came before the City last year for a final consideration and the Planning Commission raised the issue of affordable housing. He noted the Planning Commission was advised by the City Attorney that the City had no basis to raise this issue because the City had no ordinance or policy in place to require affordable housing. He appreciated how this ordinance would provide the City with the legal authority to address affordable housing with future developers. He urged the Council to pass this ordinance as recommended by the Planning Commission. Chris Hughes, 1535 Snelling Avenue North, commented it was obvious to him that approving this Ordinance would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.He supported the City having housing choices that were affordable to families at various income levels. He stated safe, stable and affordable housing provides measurable health and economic benefits for the community. He discussed how service workers, teachers, seniors and other essential personnel were in need of affordable housing in the community. He recommended the City also work to protect the naturally ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—APRIL 27, 2026 14 occurring affordable housing in the community. He urged the Council to support the recommendation from the Planning Commission and to pass the ordinance amendment. Brad Bjorklund, 3550 Ridgewood Court, stated this ordinance was based upon an observation that there was too much greed and selfishness in this country and City. He hoped this ordinance would address this concern and make the City more human. He urged the City Council to support the proposed ordinance amendment, noting he has been working on this topic for over three years. Christy Jacob, 1492 Arden Place, commented that she heard the chamber of commerce state that young people were leaving the Twin Cities and people did not understand why. She explained the price of housing was too high and the average home buyer was now 40 years of age. She reported she had adult children with graduate degrees and promising careers. She stated her children did not believe they could live in Arden Hills. She encouraged the City Council to support proposed ordinance amendment and asked that the City be even more aggressive when it comes to affordability standards. Kay Reese,2730 Hershell Street North in Roseville, explained she could not afford to live in Arden Hills when she moved to Minnesota from Seattle. She encouraged the Council to consider the time and space that this decision is being made, which was the second quarter of the 21" Century. She discussed how housing was being impacted by hedge funds buying up housing. She asked that the Council not be complacent and comfortable because schools were losing enrollment and the City was in danger of stagnating into an old community. She recommended the City consider how to include young people and the vitality that should be in the community. She feared the community that has been created won't last unless the City Council begins to think differently. Eric Diaz, 1143 Ingerson Road, stated he agreed with many of the comments that have been made. He explained the City needs to strengthen its affordable housing ordinance to require developers to include affordable units in all multi-family units. He reported units at 80% AMI will not help the cost-burdened renters. He supported the Lexington Avenue corridor being used for affordable housing as this would be a walkable area that has a grocery store, pharmacy, YMCA and more. He recommended this corridor be zoned solely for affordable housing. He indicated he has a background in community and regional planning and he encouraged the City pursue more walkable initiatives. He ended his comments by thanking staff and the City Council for their efforts on behalf of the community. With no one coming forward to speak, Mayor Grant closed the public hearing at 9:15 p.m. 11. NEW BUSINESS A. City Code Chapter 13—Zoning Code Amendments—Planning Case 26-006 • Ordinance 2026-007 Amending City Code Chapter 13—Zoning Code, Section 1320 to Include a New Section 1320.16—Requirements for Affordable Housing • Authorization of Publication of Summary Ordinance Community Development Director Reilly stated this item was presented to the City Council under Agenda Item 10.A. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—APRIL 27, 2026 15 Mayor Grant asked if the development next to North Heights Church would be 200 units. He recalled this development would have 119 units. He noted he did research on salaries noting the average teacher salary was $68,000. He stated the starting salary for teachers was $46,000 and high end for teachers was $98,000. He commented full time firefighters earn approximately $89,000 to $113,000 annually. He provided further information on the salaries for firefighters/EMT's, police officers and sheriff deputies. City Administrator Jagoe clarified the North Heights Church housing project would have 119 units. Councilmember Holden discussed how residents in the City moved out of the smaller houses and into the new senior housing, which provided turnover for the City's housing units. She asked if Eden Prairie, Edina, Golden Valley, Hopkins and St. Louis Park have a rental licensing procedures in place. Community Development Director Reilly stated he was not certain if these communities had a rental licensing procedure in place. Councilmember Holden reported she received 20 emails in support of this ordinance and 15 emails against the ordinance. She referred to Section 2, noting the language states the City was to create affordable housing without requiring public subsidy or tax increment. She was of the opinion the City was offering too much density in order to receive affordable housing units. She indicated she would like to see affordable units being built without the density reward. She hoped the Council could amend this language. She noted in Subdivision 5, Applicability Item 5, she recommended this language be changed to read: Purchase from the City of Arden Hills unless the City Council approves a waiver. She reported 30% AMI was originally excluded because that was already low income, noting the maximum was to be 50% AMI. She feared the language within the ordinance was being repetitive. She commented under Item C Item 1, she suggested the language be tighter when it comes to the distribution of units. She questioned if it was a state law that all units had to be constructed with the same design, building materials and construction quality. Community Development Director Reilly indicated he could not confirm this was a state law. He explained this was why he included a provision within the ordinance that all of the units had to be equal in quality. Councilmember Holden commented under Item 2C it states all units are to have access to all amenities. She questioned how this would be managed if an affordable renter was damaging the game room. Community Development Director Reilly stated this ordinance would allow all residents to have access to the amenities and facilities within the apartment building. He reported this requirement was to be followed up to and unless a situation was created when the provision was provoked and this situation would be managed between the property owner and the renter. City Attorney Kirchoff explained this provision would not prohibit a property owner from using another state law to trespass or remove someone from a facility. Councilmember Holden stated under Item 3 would a developer be required to have all five (or 5%) of the three-bedroom units within a housing development remain affordable. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—APRIL 27, 2026 16 Community Development Director Reilly reviewed the affordability requirements within the proposed chart, noting a developer was required to provide a minimum number of three-bedroom units if 60 units of housing were requested. Councilmember Monson inquired if the table was stating 5% of the units had to be affordable or all 5% of the affordable units had to be three bedrooms. Community Development Director Reilly indicated the percentages only apply to projects with more than 150 units otherwise the project would be required to provide five affordable units. He provided further clarification on the requirements within the table. Councilmember Holden suggested the language be reworded for clarity purposes. She recommended the 55+ senior housing developments not be required to have a three-bedroom development. Community Development Director Reilly reported the intent is to address a mix of housing types within a single building or development to accommodate what the market has shown to needs. He explained just because the market shows a need for a specific type of units, it does not mean developers will produce these types of units. Rather, developers tend to develop the most amount of units possible for the least amount of money in order to retain the most amount of rent possible. Councilmember Holden asked about the provisions for three-bedroom units and if that has to do with affordability. She stated she did not support the city telling developers what type of units they can and cannot include in their apartment building, especially if the developer has completed a housing study. Community Development Director Reilly reported market rate developments would not have to provide family-sized units but they would have to ask the City Council for permission to build an all-market-rate project. Councilmember Holden commented under Subsection 7 Item B the provision would allow a tenant to live in a low-income apartment at 140% AMI. Community Development Director Reilly indicated this was the typical standard for having someone move from an income restricted unit into a non-restricted unit. Councilmember Holden expressed concern with the fact an affordable unit could be taken up by a tenant that has an income that makes 140% AMI for fifteen years. She stated if this was the case, she would like the percentage lowered. Community Development Director Reilly reported this was the case. Councilmember Holden indicated she has a problem with the bonus densities. She recommended the 50%be changed to 25% or 15%. She questioned how the 25%parking flexibility was decided. Community Development Director Reilly commented 25% was reasonable and was a standard used by other communities that have parking minimums. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—APRIL 27, 2026 17 Councilmember Holden inquired if 25% was too high and suggested this be lowered to 15% or 20%because most of the tenants living within these developments would need to have a car in order to get to a job because the City did not have public transportation. She requested staff speak to how the distribution of the floater units. Community Development Director Reilly indicated developers will show where the units could be or lease them as tenants come in.He reported this language was taken from another communities' inclusionary housing ordinance and developers have experience with this language. Councilmember Holden questioned if income verification would be done on existing tenants. Community Development Director Reilly stated typically income verification is only done at the time a unit is rented. He noted the City could require income certifications on a yearly basis. Councilmember Holden reported in Attachment B on the first page in the last paragraph she wanted to know who was cost burdened and asked how Bethel and Presbyterian Homes ties into this. Community Development Director Reilly commented those who are cost burdened was anyone not in group quarters. He indicated those living in assisted living facilities were not included in this number. He stated students and those living in memory care facilities were also not included. Councilmember Monson stated she supported the document as presented by staff. MOTION: Councilmember Monson moved and Councilmember Weber seconded a motion to adopt Ordinance 2026-007 Amending City Code Chapter 13—Zoning Code, Section 1320 to Include a New Section 1320.16 — Requirements for Affordable Housing as amended removing Paragraph 3 in Section 5E. Mayor Grant questioned how many units the City was supposed to have in order to meet the goals of the Metropolitan Council. Community Development Director Reilly reported the City was to add 222 units. Mayor Grant explained TCAAP would add 2,000 housing units to the City and 20%of those units were proposed to be affordable. He indicated this development would add 400 affordable units to the City. He questioned why the City was subjecting current Arden Hills to some of these items. He was of the opinion the City would be well advised to have a rental licensing program given the number of rental units that were being proposed in the City. He anticipated this would assist the City with ensuring affordable units were remaining affordable after construction. He discussed how this ordinance would not impact the Platinum 55 development. Community Development Director Reilly reported this was the case. Mayor Grant asked if this document would be retroactive or impactful on existing apartment buildings. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—APRIL 27, 2026 18 Community Development Director Reilly commented this document would not be retroactive, but if any existing apartment building were to redevelop or be rehabilitated to impact the number of units or rental rates the ordinance would affect what happens next with these properties. Mayor Grant asked what staff meant by Findings of Fact. Community Development Director Reilly explained the Findings of Fact match the findings from the Planning Commission and could be incorporated within the ordinance code language. Mayor Grant recommended the findings be omitted for ease of reading. Further discussion ensued regarding the work staff was doing to update the zoning code. Mayor Grant questioned if Item Sub 2E meant affordable housing units could be created without TIF or subsidies. Community Development Director Reilly reported this provision states affordable units would not be tied to a request for financial assistance and does not prevent the City from responding to a request for financial assistance. Mayor Grant stated he supported the TBI (Total Buy In) paragraph should be stricken. He indicated he was surprised by the inclusion of 30%AMI. He understood the Planning Commission discussed this matter at length and wanted this document to closely align with Shoreview, noting Shoreview does not have a 30% AMI provision. He spoke to how it would be difficult for developers to have deeply affordable units requiring the same design standards as the non- affordable units. Community Development Director Reilly stated research suggests this is not true,but developers will tell the Council that it is. Mayor Grant questioned why the City would require age restricted (55+) developments to have a three-bedroom unit. Community Development Director Reilly commented these developers typically would not put three-bedroom units into a senior complex, even if there was interest. However, three-bedroom units often rent first because they are the hardest to find. Mayor Grant anticipated requiring an age-restricted development to have three-bedroom units could make the proforma or finances more difficult. He suggested the 140% AMI percentage not be allowed in inclusionary housing. He hoped the Council could have more discussion on this topic. He recommended the density bonus percentage be reconsidered. He suggested language be added to the ordinance that states the bonus units could be built to different standards and will be rented at market rate, noting none of the bonus units have to be affordable. He spoke to the covenant language and questioned what the terms "runs with the land" and "required period"meant. City Attorney Kirchoff explained the required period was 20 years and reported runs with the land meant documentation would be recorded against the property. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—APRIL 27, 2026 19 Mayor Grant addressed one of the comments made during the public hearing where an individual referred to the City as being full of greed. He noted these were tough economic times but stated he did not believe the City itself was full of greed. He referenced the inclusionary housing policies that staff provided to the Council, noting there were only eight other cities in the metro area with this type of policy in place. He commented on the other communities that were pursuing inclusionary housing policies and questioned if there were any cities that had 3,000 residents. Community Development Director Reilly stated Falcon Heights has approximately 3,200 residents. Mayor Grant commented it was his hope the Council could discuss this ordinance and gain consensus. Councilmember Rousseau thanked Community Development Director Reilly for all of his efforts on this document. She stated she appreciated all of the discussion the Planning Commission had on this topic as well. She indicated an affordable housing corridor was discussed during the public hearing and noted this was not something the Council would address at this meeting but noted this topic could be addressed by the EDA in the future. She questioned if Section 6.3 were removed would the language within the ordinance be too prescriptive. Councilmember Weber addressed the AMI table. He was of the opinion developers should have to provide 15% of the units at 80% AMI and suggested developers be required to provide 10% of the units at 60%AMI. He indicated he supported the density bonuses as proposed. He addressed a paragraph in Section 5B and recommended fees be collected in lieu of units when possible, noting these dollars would assist with funding future affordability in the City. He suggested this fee be placed on the City's fee schedule and be reviewed on a yearly basis. Councilmember Monson stated her preference would be to keep the AMI table as is. She explained Shoreview has had success with these AMI values and she did not want to drive developers away from Arden Hills and to Shoreview. Councilmember Holden agreed with Councilmember Monson, noting she did not want Arden Hills to be in competition with Shoreview. Councilmember Weber requested further comment from staff on whether the pet fees, parking fees, pool fees, etc. were included in the rental rates and affordability level. Community Development Director Reilly explained optional fees,such as renting a parking space or pet fees were not part of the total rent calculation but utilities were. He reported Subdivision 7- Affordability Controls Rent Limits states that maximum rent for affordable units including utilities, parking and all mandatory fees shall not exceed 30% of the applicable AMI level adjusted for household size and bedroom count. AMENDMENT: Councilmember Rousseau moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a motion to remove Subdivision 6, Item 3. Councilmember Weber supported the table remaining and suggested the 55+ requirement for three-bedroom units be removed. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—APRIL 27, 2026 20 Councilmember Monson stated she preferred requiring developers to construct family sized units. Councilmember Holden indicated the table has limits and explained she would be supporting the amendment. She did not believe it was necessary for 55+ senior developments to have a three- bedroom unit on every floor. Mayor Grant commented he does not see logic in requiring the 55+ senior developments to have three-bedroom units. Councilmember Monson explained she would prefer to keep all of this language but could support striking the 55+ language in Section 3. A roll call vote was taken. The amendment carried 3-2 (Councilmembers Monson and Weber opposed). AMENDMENT: Councilmember Holden moved and Mayor Grant seconded a motion to strike the words "is recommended by the Arden Hills Planning Commission and" from Subdivision 5A Item 5. Councilmember Weber stated a recommendation to deny was still a recommendation. He understood the language may be redundant, but he supported the language remaining as is. City Attorney Kirchoff reported the way the language currently reads, the Planning Commission would recommend approval of a waiver. Councilmember Weber inquired if it was redundant to have this language in place. Councilmember Holden stated all of Item 5 was redundant. Councilmember Monson indicated under the current language, a waiver would need to be recommended for approval from the Planning Commission and the City Council in order to be approved. City Attorney Kirchoff stated this is a really good point. Councilmember Monson commented this meant if the Planning Commission were to recommend denial of a waiver and the City Council were to offer their support, the waiver would not be approved. For this reason, she would support the amendment on the floor. A roll call vote was taken. The amendment carried (5-0). Mayor Grant stated he would like to make an amendment that addresses density bonus units and how they could be market rate and have upgraded features. Community Development Director Reilly cautioned the City Council from putting in code the bonus units could be upgraded from all other units. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—APRIL 27, 2026 21 AMENDMENT: Mayor Grant moved and Councilmember Weber seconded a motion to add "density bonus units may be market rate" to Subdivision 8,Item A. The amendment carried (5-0). AMENDMENT: Councilmember Holden moved a motion to amend Subdivision 7, Item B, reducing the 140% AMI to 120% AMI. Community Development Director Reilly stated this amendment would make Arden Hills different from other communities that follow the federal government standards. Councilmember Holden explained if an individual came in at 30% AMI and was now making 140%AMI, she wanted to see this unit made available to someone else that was making 30%AMI. The amendment failed for lack of a second. AMENDMENT: Councilmember Holden moved and Mayor Grant seconded a motion to amend Subdivision 11, Item A4 noting this language should read: income verification documentation for new tenants and existing. Councilmember Rousseau explained she attended an affordable housing tour in Duluth where parent and child income was discussed. She inquired if the City would be responsible for verifying income levels for renters in affordable housing units. Community Development Director Reilly indicated the income verification would be the responsibility of the City. Councilmember Monson stated she understood the reason for this language because there would be people who would abuse the system. However, she feared an annual check would create situations where housing became unstable for the people who were working to get out of poverty. Councilmember Weber agreed this should not be overlooked and noted he would be open to income verification while not tripping up individuals who may have recently received a promotion. Councilmember Holden commented if an individual went from $12 per hour to $35 per hour over a period of time this person has gotten a foot up. She supported this individual moving to another unit because their income has increased over 100% in order to make the affordable unit available to people who need it. Community Development Director Reilly clarified the rent level for individuals living in affordable units changes based on their income. He stated rent can be increased over time to match the income qualification and is not income restricted housing. Councilmember Monson reported it was getting very late and she would like to excuse the staff members that did not have to remain at this meeting at this time. Mayor Grant recommended Finance Director Yang and Public Works Director Swearingen be excused. Councilmember Monson stated she would like to move this item along. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—APRIL 27, 2026 22 Mayor Grant indicated his sense was that this item was not close to being approved. Councilmember Monson explained she would like to table action on this item to the first Council meeting in May. City Administrator Jagoe reported there was a motion and second on the floor for the amendment proposed by Councilmember Holden. She explained this matter would have to be dispensed with prior to the Council could table action on this item. Mayor Grant stated a motion to table would take precedent. City Attorney Kirchoff indicated this was the case. MOTION: Councilmember Monson moved and Mayor Grant seconded a motion to table action on this item to the first City Council meeting in May.A roll can vote was taken. The motion failed 1-4 (Councilmember Holden, Monson, Rousseau and Weber opposed). Councilmember Monson was of the opinion it was unacceptable for the City Council meeting to go this late. Mayor Grant reminded Councilmember Monson that she voted against tabling the meeting. Councilmember Holden stated this was an important document. She explained she watched the Planning Commission meeting and she had a lot of questions for staff regarding this document. She noted she had six more amendments for the Council to consider. Mayor Grant indicated he had three or four more amendments as well. Councilmember Weber was of the opinion tabling action on this item would be a huge step backwards. He supported the Council moving forward with the additional amendments. Councilmember Monson called the question for the amendment that was on the floor. A roll call vote was taken to call the question. The vote failed 3-2 (Councilmember Holden and Mayor Grant opposed). Mayor Grant explained a two-thirds vote was required to close discussion on a matter. Councilmember Holden inquired if the Mayor was choosing to make this meeting go longer. Mayor Grant indicated he was choosing to allow for additional discussion on this topic. Councilmember Monson excused herself from the meeting. Councilmember Holden expressed concern with the fact that a resident living in a 30% AMI affordable unit could make up to 140% AMI and could remain within the unit. She asked staff to speak to this further. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—APRIL 27, 2026 23 Community Development Director Reilly reported this was not a low-income requirement ordinance but rather was an inclusionary housing ordinance. He explained the desired outcome was mixed income housing and allowing people to remain in place creates a mixed income scenario. He stated once an individual reaches the 140% AMI threshold their unit or another unit becomes an affordable unit. He reiterated that this ordinance was not a provision for housing strictly for people who were low income but rather was for inclusive development. He indicated the affordability was associated with the unit and not the person. Mayor Grant asked if under Subdivision 11, the property owner has to submit the affordability/income verification information to the City. Community Development Director Reilly reported this was the case. Mayor Grant indicated these reports would be submitted to the City, but the City of Arden Hills does not have a rental licensing program. Councilmember Monson returned to the meeting and asked that the discussion return to the matter at hand. Councilmember Holden explained she had questions to ask of staff prior to considering the amendment on the table. Councilmember Rousseau excused herself from the meeting. With there being no further discussion, Mayor Grant called for the vote. The amendment failed 2-2 (Councilmembers Monson and Weber opposed). (Councilmember Rousseau was absent for the vote). AMENDMENT: Councilmember Holden moved and Mavor Grant seconded a motion to amend Section 8, Item A in the second paragraph changing the bonus density from 50% to 35%. Councilmember Weber stated the current language would allow for a density bonus up to 50%. He noted language as is, allows for the City to negotiate with developers in the future. Councilmember Holden commented she did not anticipate developers would go lower when they would be allowed to have a 50% density bonus. Community Development Director Reilly explained the density bonus was written to be negotiable with the words may and up to. Councilmember Holden inquired who would be setting the density bonus. Community Development Director Reilly reported the density bonus would be determined by the City Council. Councilmember Weber excused himself from the meeting. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—APRIL 27, 2026 24 Mayor Grant was of the opinion 35% was too generous. He feared that developers would play a game in order to get as many units as possible on the property, while keeping the number of affordable units low. Councilmember Weber returned to the meeting. Councilmember Monson excused herself from the meeting. Mayor Grant stated he understood the bonus units would rent at market rate. He asked how the City defined market rate. Community Development Director Reilly reported market rate rents today in the Twin Cities were anywhere from $1,200 for a one-bedroom unit to $2,000 for a three-bedroom unit. Mayor Grant inquired if these figures could be equated to AMI. Community Development Director Reilly explained this was a single person making$43,000 per year renting a one-bedroom unit. Councilmember Monson returned to the meeting. Councilmember Holden questioned why the City didn't follow Shoreview's example when it came to density bonuses. She reported Shoreview only allows for eight to 20 units per acre and the City was proposing 50%. Community Development Director Reilly indicated the City was not proposing 50 units per acre but rather was proposing a 50%bonus density. He noted the maximum units per acre in Arden Hills was 20. He stated Shoreview allows for more units per acre in certain parts of their city than Arden Hills does. A roll call vote was taken. The amendment to change the density bonus failed 2-3 (Councilmembers Monson, Rousseau and Weber opposed). AMENDMENT: Mayor Grant moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a motion to amend Subsection 6, Item A to remove 30% AMI. Mayor Grant commented he supported Arden Hills working to closely align with Shoreview on this matter. Councilmember Holden stated developers know how to get funding if they want to put in 30% AMI units. She referred to the table noting the income level referenced was $0 to $50,000. Mayor Grant was of the opinion this reference has no purpose and should be removed. A roll call vote was taken. The amendment to remove 30% AMI failed 2-3 (Councilmembers Monson, Rousseau and Weber opposed). ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—APRIL 27, 2026 25 Mayor Grant stated he really wants to support this ordinance but he was of the opinion leaving the 30%AMI in the document was a mistake. He indicated if this language was removed, he might be able to support the City Code amendment. Councilmember Rousseau excused herself from the meeting. Councilmember Holden explained she did not support the density bonus remaining at 50%. She reported developers would not have to construct any additional affordable units but would be allowed 50%more density under the current language. Councilmember Rousseau returned to the meeting. Mayor Grant stated that was probably true and maybe no developer will choose the 30% option, so he shouldn't let that concern himself and maybe he will support. Councilmember Weber stated there were people who cared about 30%AMI affordability and will go after it. He noted it was about finding the right developer. He explained the City provided a boatload of density to Platinum 55 on the North Heights property for basically nothing but rather was done for a trail segment which they reneged on. Mayor Grant inquired if the Platinum 55 developer would be completing the trail and stated it was his understanding they had not reneged on the trail. City Administrator Jagoe reported the approvals as amended by the Council remain with the project. Mayor Grant questioned if the Platinum 55 project received extra density. City Administrator Jagoe stated the approvals as Council had amended that project still stay with that project. She noted the developer had not yet applied for the building permit and when they do, they would be subject to the development agreement that was recorded on the property. Mayor Grant inquired if they received extra density. City Administrator Jagoe explained that they did not double the density but did in fact receive additional density. She would need to verify the actual number. Councilmember Holden questioned why the Platinum 55 topic was brought up. She asked if this was a delay tactic. She encouraged the Council to stick to one lane. A roll call vote was taken. The amended motion which included striking the paragraph regarding the TBI payment carried (5-0). MOTION: Councilmember Monson moved and Councilmember Weber seconded a motion to Authorize Publication of Summary Ordinance for Ordinance 2026- 007. The motion carried 4-1 (Councilmember Holden opposed). 12. UNFINISHED BUSINESS ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—APRIL 27, 2026 26 None. 13. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Rousseau thanked Kate for serving on the Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee. She welcomed Clara Bitzer to the Committee. Councilmember Rousseau requested the Council receive more information from staff on Ramsey County's Economic Development Authority. Councilmember Rousseau reported she would like more information on the parking citations that were being issued by the Ramsey County Sheriff. City Administrator Jagoe explained she followed up with the Ramsey County Sheriff's Department and learned the parking citations were $31. She noted she was waiting to hear back where these dollars were being allocated and indicated she would provide the Council with this information at an upcoming work session meeting. Councilmember Weber stated he attended the PTRC meeting last week where a presentation was made regarding the installation of a cross-country ski trail around Farrel's Lake. He noted this was Ramsey County Park property but would be a great addition to the community. He reported if this request were to move forward, he suggested the City send a letter of support to the County. Councilmember Holden reported she attended an Earth Day clean up event at the National Guard property. Councilmember Holden explained the 75t' Anniversary of Arden Hills would be celebrated on Friday, July 17. Councilmember Holden stated Ruby's Pantry, which was hosted at North Heights Church, has closed. She noted this has led to a growing need with the Ralph Reeder Food Shelf. She encouraged residents to consider making a donation to the food shelf for those in need in the community. Councilmember Monson thanked staff for their patience and for staying late at this meeting. Mayor Grant welcomed the new City Attorney. Mayor Grant thanked Ramsey County for the work that was being done on New Brighton Road. Mayor Grant explained the City was offering a $200 rebate for appliances that conserve water. Mayor Grant thanked Community Development Director Reilly for all of his efforts on the inclusionary housing ordinance. City Administrator Jagoe commented the North Heights property was 10.75 acres and the net acres after wetlands were deducted was 8.55 acres. She indicated the site was eligible for 12 units per acre which would have allowed for 102 units. She noted the density bonus allowed for 13.9 units per acre or 119 units, which was 17 more units than what the zoning code would have allowed for. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—APRIL 27, 2026 27 City Administrator Jagoe reported the Council would have to take action on the work session being recessed earlier in the evening, after this meeting was adjourned. ADJOURN MOTION: Councilmember Rousseau moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a motion to adiourn. The motion carried (5-0). Mayor Grant adjourned the Regular City Council Meeting at 11:53 p.m. AwfYI-1) Y4440 J 1 Hanson David Grant it Clerk Mayor