HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-22-26-WSMayor:
David Grant
Councilmembers:
Brenda Holden
Emily Rousseau
Tena Monson
Kurt Weber
City Council
Work Session Agenda
June 22, 2026
5:00 p.m.
City Hall
Address:
1245 W Highway 96
Arden Hills MN 55112
Phone:
651-792-7800
Website:
www.cityofardenhills.org
City Vision
Arden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential
neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our
long-standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play.
Members of the public may attend a meeting in -person at City Hall or they may
view the meeting remotely on the City's website using the below link. Meetings are
also broadcast on Cable Channel 16 for those that live in Arden Hills.
https://cityofardenhills.org/320/Watch-City-Meetings
Some Councilmembers may be participating in this meeting by interactive
technology/remotely.
This meeting will be streamed live on local Cable Channel 16 and available for playback on our
website.
CALL TO ORDER
1. PUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL
This is an opportunity for citizens to respectfully bring to the Council's attention any
items which are relevant to the City. In addressing the Council, you must first state
your name and address for the record. Comments shall be limited to three (3) minutes
or less. Written documents or other materials should be handed to the City Clerk for
distribution to the Council prior to or during the meeting. Council will generally not
respond at the same meeting where an issue is initially raised by a member of the
public but the Council may refer the issue to staff for further research and possible
report or action at a future Council meeting.
2. RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIES
3. AGENDA ITEMS
3.A. Rice Creek Boulevard Discussion
Kimley-Horn
Documents:
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
ATTACHMENT B.PDF
ATTACHMENT C.PDF
ATTACHMENT D.PDF
ATTACHMENT E.PDF
3.13. Cities For Safe And Stable Communities
Jessica Jagoe, City Administrator
Documents:
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
3.C. Sign Ordinance - Election Signs
Jake Reilly, Community Development Director
Documents:
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
ATTACHMENT B.PDF
ATTACHMENT C.PDF
3.D. Code Of Conduct
Jessica Jagoe, City Administrator
Documents:
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
ATTACHMENT B.PDF
ATTACHMENT C.PDF
ATTACHMENT D.PDF
ATTACHMENT E.PDF
3.E. E1. Use Of City Property And E2. Immigration Enforcement Discussion
Jessica Jagoe, City Administrator
Documents:
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
3.F. Rice Creek Commons/TCAAP Discussion
Jessica Jagoe, City Administrator
Documents:
MEMO.PDF
3.G. Agenda Planning
Jessica Jagoe, City Administrator
Documents:
MEMO.PDF
ATTACHMENT A.PDF
ATTACHMENT B.PDF
4. COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS
ADJOURN
AGENDA ITEM - 3A
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 22, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
Jessica Jagoe, City Administrator
FROM: David Swearingen, P.E. Public Works Director / City Engineer
SUBJECT: Rice Creek Boulevard construction project update
Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source:
$0 $0 N/A
Council Should Consider
• Proposed Rice Creek Boulevard Improvements as presented
• Final Draft Cooperative Agreement between Ramsey County and the City of Arden Hills
• Proposed Landscaping to be included with the Rice Creek Boulevard construction
• Proposed Lighting to be included with the Rice Creek Boulevard construction
Background/Discussion
Kimley-Horn and Ramsey County will be providing a presentation related to the Rice Creek
Boulevard construction project.
City and Ramsey County Staff have negotiated the Final Draft Cooperative Agreement,
Attachment B. The City Attorney has reviewed the Final Draft Cooperative Agreement and
recommended language on the County's recovery of trunk utility costs has been incorporated
within as it relates to Section 7. Depending on feedback from the City Council, the Final
Cooperative Agreement is planned to come to the July 13, 2026 regular City Council Meeting for
formal approval.
The primary components of the proposed landscaping to be constructed with the roadway project
(Attachment C) includes trees, boulevard turf, and street lighting. The proposed plans do not
include any "enhanced landscaping" for example, pedestrian lighting, monument signs,
ornamental railings, structures, planting beds, etc. The proposed tree species will follow the
City's standard tree list.
Page 1 of 2
At the request of Council, the design team evaluated applying different guidelines (versus a
single guideline) for lighting based on residential and commercial zones. This analysis is
depicted in Attachment D. The results of this analysis actually increased the number of lights in
the residential zone (with lower wattage bulbs) in order to maintain lighting uniformity. The
proposed lighting recommendation is a uniform light fixture utilizing the MnDOT's intermediate
spacing criteria for the entire corridor. This results in light spacing range of 275-350 feet per side
using the 30 foot, 150 watt Xcel Energy approved light fixture. The project team is
recommending delaying installation of pedestrian light fixtures until adjacent development
occurs although installation of underground conduit would be included with the 2027-28
roadway and trail construction. This approach is recommended to better locate pedestrian light
fixtures in conjunction with final development layouts. The lighting design direction can be
modified as desired by the JDA. Per the final draft cooperative agreement, the County will cover
the full cost of the street and pedestrian lighting construction.
Attachment E includes the 2015 Preliminary Design landscape enhancements concept plans for
reference. The City Council should provide feedback if they feel these concepts are still
applicable and share that feedback with the JDA.
Budtet Impact
Per the Final Draft Cooperative Agreement (Attachment B), the City's cost participation for the
entire project is $0. The agreement is structured similar to the Outlot A (Thumb Parcel)
cooperative agreement where the County covered the construction costs that are typically applied
to the City with the expectation that the costs will be recovered through land sale proceeds.
The final draft cooperative agreement addresses the costs for watermain improvements
constructed for Rice Creek Commons outside of the proposed trunk utilities to be reimbursed by
Ramsey County. The watermain improvements include the Old Snelling/Old Highway 10
segment constructed in 2018 and the watermain upgrades in the City of Roseville on Hamline
Avenue.
As the project construction is completed and accepted, maintenance responsibilities and
operating expenses for the utilities, trails, lighting, and landscaping will shift to the City and
County as outlined in the Final Draft Cooperative Agreement.
Section 7 of the final draft cooperative agreement includes language for the County to recover
trunk utility costs through Chapter 429 Assessments in the event it cannot recover all of its costs
through land sales. Once the trunk utility costs are finalized, the assessment waiver agreement
will come to the Council for approval. The assessment waiver agreement would be recorded and
if the costs are paid at closing, then it would not be sent to the County Auditor for collecting
through assessments. However, if the buyer and County agreed that the costs could be paid over
time, the assessments would be certified to the County Auditor. The City has considered the
City's administrative costs that may be involved in the assessment process and there is language
in Section 7 to address that expense.
Attachments
Attachment A — Kimley-Horn presentation slides
Attachment B — Final Draft of Cooperative Agreement
Attachment C — Proposed Landscaping
Attachment D — Proposed Lighting
Attachment E — 2015 Preliminary Design Landscaping pages
Page 2 of 2
0
Vl
N
0
V
0
V
,NO
N
O
N
N
N
Attachment A
-15
Y
LLI
LLI
V
3
>
O
•�
>
O-
O
o
4-'
U
V
4-J
O
4-
'0
-0
O
Q
a
D
0
O
E
O
O
an
on
Von
C:
4-J
C: _r_
.on
J J
A A
4—%
V
O
L.
r
on
m
No
fV
O
N
L
Q
U
U
=
L
N
N
U
c
U
o
N
�
�
O
m
v
�
O
c
c
•�
cn
v
E
U
M
U
N
U_
v
cn
�O
N
on
N E
� O U O
U N a-' Q
O
L-- v On
Ebn U •O � 3
c
� c� O r U
O O-C U L*jN O
on on
V) vii J L C:
u N Z3 O
O� E E0 O N U
4- � 0 �� O
a)O O C: U O m
on 0
on L >4-- E N
.E an .E 0 E
N � a)an a-' �(0.0 m E V
c =
N
a Q^ 0 0 E
:0
m J U E Q N
D
a� E
� L/ U O
U U
Q 1 lo-
a
d
O
J
v
�o
0 D0
Y
J
1
I
I
O ui
03
a
U i
>U
O
'
C
O
d
m N
I
I
I
1
I
1
I
W
i
OQ;
o
a Ix
1
a = Q v az
UVI
O 'c6m=! U VJ Za
jZ La
W
N i aO0 N
<F
U
m O J
U a
o�
���
Z_ W J 2
as Do $w
\
2 a:CLa
a c>
a
J
Z W
O: Z) W m Z
I
1
WZ W\
~ W ~ Q'
Li
^�-j
I
3
3a o >m
ZIx
c>� a�
O
o
IA
a o c�
a
v--
----
--
N
o V� Q
a
o >
N
K z W
�o J Y
W
N
z_
v w W
~
x
� I
LU
_
z
> '
w U
LaO
W
I
LLJ
a
I
Q
U
V
>�
s �N
a W
0 o¢
•
W V >
Z Z � ZV VI
W
z
a i vWia o�
`
O=
ri
Nr
O J O Q
T
m
V)
_
(an
�\ Q
O
W
2
�
y N Q p
-- ----
--
a4 U
'
Vp O
CB1
viz
In
W J tL
\
O�W �2
�.� J�
I
W
,o
ate XF cQ_ j
a
i
W > V
a
Cn a
J
�o
�
a
T'
1 V��
r z�
~v �i.<z OJ
•
ZVl
LLS
O I J~�
a Vlin W
W H\
Ln
J
D
O
U�
N< IO mJIx
a� ��aO0
H x
z U U a
�joa>
a
NLLJ
U
� W
•
U-
O
La
a >� N a a
^ �
'
j� fi
J a a J uj
La x~�I,I
�
Od'F t am
a � ao " N �
\
O
/
V
,^
'
1
>
Y O
~
'J
L
.�
N
03
�I
��
•J
T
O
U
o
1-
m
ll
1
o �
He W
W
-J
> �
V
on
Ec o
a-J
U
�
0
<
WL
(`�
4-J
c9
d
1
o
/
=
J Won
/ 1
I 1
o�La Z
O
J
2W
uLLSW~
>
W H
-
-
-
a o
1
1
O
-61
a-J N
V
'o
O
`~
0
a)
L
Q
(
O
N
On
O
C
�
•Q
V
cn
O
M
on
E
•V'
an
Q
C
O
C
'�
J
V
J
J
�-
C
(U
v
C
D
>
>
O
C
C
u
co
co
-O
O
m
u
Q) v
4-J
4-J
N
U
U
U
U
an
+,
a
u
_0
E
E
r--.
C
N
o
eV
O
on
C
Q ..
O �
a
^ cn
m
N O
O U
N C
C N
cn U
�'.-v
i
a�
4-1
0
u
V
j
0
Q
Q
�
V
�i
•;
4
0
•r
a
a--J
U
0
L
O
o
3
0
0
•�
�,
'N
E
O
O
N
0
�+
0
E
w•0
ateJ
0
L"-
V
V
cn
U
U
V)
V)
N
O
i
Q
E
fV
O
3
Q�
•N
E
an
.on
J
ru
on
.Q
N
J
C
O
u
i
Q
a-J
N
0
VI
I
N
O
U
N
O
L
N
0
L
4-
f�
tU
0
.61
-
N
N
a-J
N
0
N
VI
O
U
L
a-J
L
O
N
a-J
E
VI
N
VN
N
ra
ON
U
4-
0
N
a-J
a_
a
FI
" N
(D wi
LU
U)
m
®rt
A vs. - It
f *V
-lot
If
LU
0
cf)
L >
U
a-
0
2f
CC)
Lu
C/)
U)
<
LU CL
Cf)
a -
CO
U)
<
0
cr-
LU
CIO
L-u
If
If
AL
-I i f
i
II
II
II
j N
# 1 'o
II
II
II
n
IL
Ir
►i
USA
on
Q'N
M
V�
N
0
�
V
J
N
N
L7
O�
o
0
a
cn
0
F-
Ou
N
70
�
�
N
J
f�
�
4-J
U
C
ra
p
m
L
X
L-
Z
D-
4J
.�
u
-
�
�
�
co
cnm
V)
V�
1
H AiNnoo
O
I�
I)
I�
Iff
� 11r1
If
Il
I
I
on
on
•
a--J
On
4-J
on4-J
`~
\
O
O •^
;,
\
4-J
Q
—..�.._..i
cn
..
O
0
J W
Q J
U0
LU
2U
2 FL
U0
>LL
� � Q
W U
U a
Z
W 0 LL
Z a
o
N
JZLL
Q p o
U H N
LU W Z:�
Z
g U
O Qa
Ulm
w
J
it
Z
wU
�
a wQc a
J C J
gwU a
a�
p (9 N
JZ LL
Q
rQ
w? z
g U
w� a
I J N
a-J
Q
a-J
4 ^ '
•� W
N N
an
•V
Q U
on
a--j
C�
on
J
a- J
Q�
V
ro
V
a- J
Ln
O .O
4- 4-J
O V
M �
O
N V
L
fo
4-)
a- J cn
N •�
4�-+ N
O
N 4-J
a�
4-J=
O
Ln N
(a a)
-0_0
� Q
o
-a
o �
V Q
E
O
O
11
Coop Agt- PWKS2024-08 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS RICE CREEK BOULEVARD - RCAO clean 6-12-2026
Attachment B
RAMSEY COUNTY COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
WITH THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS FOR
RICE CREEK BOULEVARD (County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 13)
S.A.P. 062-593-004
Total Project Cost [estimated]: $33,850,000.00
City of Arden Hills Project Cost: $0
This Agreement is between the City of Arden Hills, a municipal corporation ("City")
and Ramsey County, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, ("County") for
construction of RICE CREEK BOULEVARD (County State Aid Highway 13) between
Highway 96 and County H, as generally depicted on Exhibit A, and including the
work described on the Engineer's Cost Estimate for the Project that is attached as
Exhibit B, and ownership of the project facilities as defined by this agreement and
Fxhihit r
RECITALS
1. The "Project" means and consists of the construction of Rice Creek Boulevard from
CSAH 96 to County Road H (CSAH 9), and includes (a) the construction of a
Roadway, Project Trunk Utilities, Private Utility Conduits, Trails, Street Lighting,
Pedestrian Lighting, and Landscaping, all located within the Rice Creek Boulevard
Right -of -Way, as well as (b) the installation of the Booster Station and BMPs located
outside of the Rice Creek Boulevard Right -of -Way; all as described on Exhibit B.
Capitalized terms used herein shall have the definitions therefor that are set forth in
this Agreement.
2. The Project is identified in Ramsey County's 2026-2030 Transportation
Improvement Program ("2026 — 2030 TIP").
3. Portions of the Project have been designated by the Minnesota Department
of Transportation ("MnDOT") as eligible for CSAH and MSA funds.
4. The Project has been designated as State Aid Project (S.A.P.) 062-593-
004.
5. Rice Creek Boulevard within the Project limits is located within the City.
AGREEMENTS
1. Definitions. In addition to defined terms set forth elsewhere in this Agreement, the
capitalized terms set below are defined as follows:
1.1. "Landscaping" means plantings to be installed within the Rice Creek Boulevard
Coop Agt- PWKS2024-08 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS RICE CREEK BOULEVARD - RCAO clean 6-12-2026
Right -of -Way.
1.2. "Pedestrian Lighting" means lights and poles to be installed within the Rice
Creek Boulevard Right -of -Way for the purpose of illuminating a Trail.
1.3. "Roadway" means the travelled way to be constructed within the Rice Creek
Boulevard Right -of -Way including the paved surface, base, sub -base, curb &
gutter, medians, pavement striping, signs, curb ramps, access aprons, and
appurtenances.
1.4. "Street Lighting" means lights and poles to be installed within the Rice Creek
Boulevard Right -of -Way for the purpose of illuminating the public street.
1.5. "Trails" means separated paved surfaces dedicated for pedestrian and bicycle
use, greater than or equal to 8 feet in width (paved surface is asphalt), to be
installed within the Rice Creek Boulevard Right -of -Way.
2. Responsibility for Design Engineering
2.1. Plans, specifications, and proposals will be prepared in accordance with
MnDOT State Aid requirements, Ramsey County design standards, the
TCAAP Redevelopment Code (TRC), and the City of Arden Hills Public
Works Design Manual and Standard Detail Plates as they relate to City
utilities.
2.2. The County will prepare plans, specifications, and proposals for the Project,
which will include, among other things, the proposed construction, alignment,
profiles, grades, cross sections, paving, concrete curb and gutter, medians,
storm sewer, storm water treatment in conformance with the Comprehensive
Stormwater Management Plan, pedestrian curb ramps, trails, landscaping,
lighting, turf establishment, and trunk and other utilities.
2.3. Plans for the Project showing proposed construction will be presented to the
TCAAP Joint Development Authority ("JDA") and will be on file at Ramsey
County Public Works Department.
3. Procurement and Award of Contract
3.1. The County will take bids in accordance with State law and County
procedures.
3.2. The County will award a contract and pay the contractor from the funding
sources identified for the Project in the 2026-2030 TIP.
4. Responsibility for Construction Engineering
Coop Agt- PWKS2024-08 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS RICE CREEK BOULEVARD - RCAO clean 6-12-2026
4.1. The County shall perform or contract for the performance of the construction
engineering for all elements of the Project.
4.2. Upon municipal trunk utilities passing all required testing and completion of
punch list items applicable to the utility, County will turn over ownership of the
municipal trunk utilities to the City. City can oversee, review, and verify testing
procedures and results prior to acceptance.
5. Project Costs
5.1. Except as provided herein, the County and City will participate in the costs of
construction in accordance with the Ramsey County Cost Participation Policy
and approved in the 2026 — 2030 TIP. If there is a conflict between the Cost
Participation Policy and this Agreement, this Agreement will prevail.
5.2. Subject to the provisions of Section 7 of this Agreement, and except as
otherwise expressly set forth in this Agreement, the County shall pay all
costs of construction of the Project.
5.3. Any costs associated with Project revisions after the completion of plans
and specifications will be paid for by the party requesting the revisions.
Revisions are subject to approval by the County.
5.4. Design Engineering Costs
5.4.1. The County shall pay the total design engineering fee associated with
this Project.
5.5. Construction Engineering and Administration Costs
5.5.1. The County shall pay the entire construction engineering fee associated
with this Project.
6. Construction Costs, Ownership, Maintenance, and Replacement
6.1. Roadway
6.1.1. The County will pay for the initial construction of the Roadway.
6.1.2. The County will own the roadway upon construction completion.
6.1.3. The County will be responsible for maintenance activities and expense post
construction.
Coop Agt- PWKS2024-08 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS RICE CREEK BOULEVARD - RCAO clean 6-12-2026
6.1.4. The County will be responsible for replacement of the roadway and
elements of the roadway; the city will be responsible for the local cost share
associated with the replacement of roadway components in accordance
with the County's Cost Participation Policy.
6.2. Municipal Utilities
6.2.1. The County will pay for the construction of the Trunk Utilities. For purposes
hereof, "Trunk Utilities" includes the following: (a) the water main and
related facilities and components within the Rice Creek Boulevard right -of
way; (b) the sanitary sewer main and related facilities and components
within the Rice Creek Boulevard right-of-way; (c) the storm sewer main,
catch basins and leads located within the Rice Creek Boulevard right-of-
way, and corresponding Best Management Practices areas located outside
such right-of-way ("BMPs"); and (d) the booster station (to be located
outside the Rice Creek Boulevard right -of way, within Old Snelling Avenue
right-of-way) (the "Booster Station").
6.2.2. The County will own the Trunk Utilities until completion of the construction
of the Project, at which time ownership thereof shall be transferred to the
City. Thereafter, the City shall own and maintain the Trunk Utilities
(excluding the storm sewer catch basins, leads, and corresponding
BMPs, which will be owned and maintained by the County).
6.2.3. The County will retain ownership of the Booster Station until such time as
the Booster Station is put into service; at such time the ownership of the
Booster Station and maintenance responsibility therefore shall be
transferred to the City.
6.2.4. In addition, the County will reimburse the City for the costs of the following,
which are not part of the Project: (a) the water main replacement previously
installed by the City, located within Old Snelling Avenue right-of-way; and
(b) the water main replacement to be installed by the City in 2027, to be
located within Hamline Avenue (CSAH 50) right-of-way. The City shall be
responsible for all costs of maintenance and replacement of such water
mains.
6.3. Trails
6.3.1. The County will pay for and install the Trails and related pedestrian
ramps. The Project does not include sidewalks.
6.3.2. The County shall own the Trails and related pedestrian ramps.
6.3.3. The City shall be responsible for all maintenance and preservation of the
Coop Agt- PWKS2024-08 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS RICE CREEK BOULEVARD - RCAO clean 6-12-2026
Trails and related pedestrian ramps, including but not limited to snow
removal, sweeping, patching, panel replacement, crack sealing, etc.
6.3.4. The County will be responsible for the replacement of the Trails and related
pedestrian ramps.
6.4. Private Utilities
6.4.1. The County will pay for and install private utility conduits as called out in the
construction plans ("Private Utility Conduits").
6.4.2. The County will own, and be responsible for permitting for the use of, the
Private Utility Conduits.
6.4.3. The County will maintain, through permit provisions, the private utility
conduits located within the Rice Creek Boulevard Right -of -Way.
6.4.4. The County will be responsible for the replacement of private utility conduits
within the Rice Creek Boulevard Right -of -Way in cooperation with lease
holding utility users.
6.5. Street Lighting
6.5.1. The County will pay for and install Street Lighting.
6.5.2. The County will own, maintain, and replace the streetlights for roundabouts.
(Roundabout lights to be identified in construction plans). The City will own,
maintain and replace all other streetlights.
6.5.3. City will pay the electrical costs for all Street Lighting and invoice the County
for the electrical costs related to the streetlights for the roundabouts, and
County will reimburse City for such electrical costs.
6.6. Pedestrian Lighting
6.6.1. The County will pay for and install Pedestrian Lighting desired by the JDA.
6.6.2. The City will own all Pedestrian Lighting.
6.6.3. The City will maintain all Pedestrian Lighting.
6.6.4. The City will be responsible for replacement of all Pedestrian Lighting.
6.6.5. City will pay the electrical costs for all Pedestrian lighting.
Coop Agt- PWKS2024-08 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS RICE CREEK BOULEVARD - RCAO clean 6-12-2026
6.7. Landscaping
6.7.1. The County will pay for and install Landscaping.
6.7.2. The County shall own and maintain the roundabout and median
Landscaping which meets County standards. If the City desires enhanced
Landscaping, the ownership of Landscaping and maintenance
responsibilities therefor will transfer to the City.
6.7.3. For the warranty period from the Landscaping installation contractor (two -
years for trees, one-year for all other landscape material), the County will
own, maintain (including mowing and watering), and replace the
Landscaping located outside of the curbs of the Roadway, and will enforce
the installation contractor's warranty. Upon the expiration of such warranty
period, ownership transfer of such Landscaping shall be negotiated
between the County and City to determine the timeframe of said transfer.
After transfer, the City will be responsible for all maintenance (including
mowing and watering) and replacements of such Landscaping.
6.8. City fiber conduit and handholes
6.8.1. The County will pay for and install the City fiber conduit and handholes.
6.8.2. The City will own the City fiber conduit and handholes.
6.8.3. The City will maintain the City fiber conduit and handholes.
6.8.4. The City will be responsible for replacement of the City fiber conduit and
handholes.
7. County Right to Recover Trunk Utilities Costs Through Chapter 429 Assessments
7.1. The City acknowledges that the County is funding the construction of the
Trunk Utilities ("Trunk Utilities Project") to serve Outlots A and B, Rice
Creek Commons, Second Addition ("Outlots A and B") and intends to
recover the costs of the Trunk Utility Project from the developer or developers
upon sale of Outlots A and B for development purposes.
7.2. Without limiting the foregoing, the County, as fee simple owner of Outlots A
and B has requested that 100% of the costs for the construction of the Trunk
Utilities Project be assessed against Outlots A and B under Minnesota
Statutes Chapter 429 ("Chapter 429", and such assessments, the "Chapter
429 Assessments") so that the County can recover the costs of the Trunk
Utility Project from the developer or developers of Outlots A and B.
7.3. The County will provide a feasibility report and any other information required
to determine the costs to be assessed and is willing to waive the assessment
appeal rights up to the full value of the assessment amount.
Coop Agt- PWKS2024-08 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS RICE CREEK BOULEVARD - RCAO clean 6-12-2026
7.4. The County and the City shall negotiate the terms and conditions of the Chapter
429 Assessments in a deferred assessment waiver agreement. The County
shall determine the assessment term and the assessment interest rate in the
deferred assessment waiver agreement.
7.5. The County and City agree that upon the subdivision of Outlots A and B, the
Chapter 429 Assessments may be reapportioned among the new parcels, based
on an allocation determined by the County in consultation with the City. The
County and City equally shall share the costs of preparing any Chapter 429
Assessments reapportionment documents, including amended deferred
assessment waiver agreements, recording fees and other administrative costs.
7.6. City and County agree that, when collected, the County will retain the Chapter
429 Assessments collected to reimburse itself for the cost of the Trunk Utilities
Project, and City shall have no right or claim to the Chapter 429 Assessments.
The deferred assessment waiver agreement shall include this provision.
8. The City and County shall indemnify, defend, and hold each other harmless
against any and all liability, losses, costs, damages, expenses, claims, or actions,
including attorney's fees, which the indemnified party, its officials, agents, or
employees may hereafter sustain, incur, or be required to pay, arising out of or
by reason of any act or omission of the indemnifying party, its officials, agents, or
employees, in the execution, performance, or failure to adequately perform the
indemnifying party's obligation pursuant to this Agreement. Nothing in this
Agreement shall constitute a waiver by the County or the City of any statutory or
common law immunities, limits, or exceptions on liability.
9. This Agreement shall remain in full force and effect until terminated by
mutual agreement of the parties.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement as of the date
of the last party's signature hereto.
[SIGNATURE PAGES ATTACHED]
Coop Agt- PWKS2024-08 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS RICE CREEK BOULEVARD - RCAO clean 6-12-2026
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS SIGNATURE PAGE
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
By:
Date:
Mayor
By:
Date:
Director of Public Works
Approved by the Office of Financial Services:
Approved as to Form:
By:
City Attorney
Coop Agt- PWKS2024-08 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS RICE CREEK BOULEVARD - RCAO clean 6-12-2026
RAMSEY COUNTY SIGNATURE PAGE
RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Date:
Ling Becker, County Manager
Approval recommended:
Brian Isaacson, Director
Public Works Department
Approved as to form:
Assistant County Attorney
Coop Agt- PWKS2024-08 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS RICE CREEK BOULEVARD - RCAO clean 6-12-2026
EXHIBIT A
DEPICTION OF PROJECT LOCATION AND LIMITS
a°
\ ry
0 0
eo
-
e
d
gm
All
"
_ � o . � s
3 m
i
1 fI }I
Z.
P, -�
i rool
____—_J L
I
r-1
4
E
a
O
O
zu
X
w
0 4-0
O
m U
-O O
O J
O p
^O M
C, V J
_�
g2je
�- f ..
s=o
o�s
a�.
tlpd
Coop Agt- PWKS2024-08 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS RICE CREEK BOULEVARD - RCAO clean 6-12-2026
EXHIBIT B
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE COST
RICE CREEK COMMONS SITE DEVELOPMENT
ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE COST
90% DESIGN SUMMARY
June 9th, 2026
Improvement Description
RICE CREEK BOULEVARD (RCB) - COUNTY INFRASTRUCTURE:
ROADWAYIMPROVEMENTS
BRIDGE IMPROVEMENTS (included in Roadway Improvemetns in attached Agreement)
PROJECT TRUNK UTILITIES (WATERMAIN' SANITARY, STORM SEWER INCLUDING BMPS)
PRIVATE UTILITY CONDUITS
TRAIL
STREET LIGHTING
PEDESTRIAN LIGHTING
LANDSCAPING
`also includes Booster Station
NOTES:
1. Estimated Costs Include 10% Construction Contingency
2. Estimated Costs do not include Indirect Costs (Eng, Admin, Financing, Etc)
Kimley>»Horn
Amount
$
12,230,000
$
4,000,000
$
13,150,000
$
300,000
$
2,280,000
$
350,000
$
1,190,000
$
350,000
TOTAL $
33,850,000
Coop Agt- PWKS2024-08 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS RICE CREEK BOULEVARD - RCAO clean 6-12-2026
EXHIBIT C
EXPLANATION OF INFRASTRUCTURE ASSET OWNERSHIP (Post -Construction)
Asset
Installed
By
Paid For
B
Owned
B
Maintained By
Roadway & Bride
County
County
County
Count
Municipal Trunk Utilities*
County
Count
City
City
Trails
County
County
County
City
Priv Util Conduits —
County (as shown in
finalplans)
County
County
County
County
Priv Util Conduits - City
County
County
City
City
Street Lighting — RAB*
County
County
County_Count
Street Lighting — Non-
RAB*
County
County
City
City
Pedestrian Lighting
County
County
City
City
Landscaping
County
County
City
City
*Utility and street light ownership will be called out in the final design plans.
Coop Agt- PWKS2024-08 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS RICE CREEK BOULEVARD - RCAO clean 6-12-2026
CERTIFICATION:
STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY
OF RAMSEY CITY OFARDEN
HILLS
I, the undersigned, City Clerk of Arden Hills, Minnesota, hereby certify that the copy
of the resolution attached:
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XX
ENTERING INTO RAMSEY COUNTY COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO.
PWKS2024-08
FOR
RICE CREEK BOULEVARD (County State Aid Highway 13)
is a true and correct copy of the original resolution adopted by the City Council of
the City of Arden Hills on the XXth day of , 2025, on file at City Hall.
WITNESS my hand this XXth day of , 2025.
U _ H Oa uNn,,A�*�rkk
10,
o c�
� z� z
O { i %
U 0 a
CL
(7
Z
Z J O
ojo
s� n
o * xm� oaLL \ +eyti
i3o
li �zx
x ° J ¢ z w
�I l ¢¢w
z ----- m O
III( V� a -
III
ID
. z a Q • a. � �,\�
a
<R i
�?, •ill. �<w �� w w w
r� II 0
> w �2 o
U o
a
z w,m j1.j Lu w,o S1'
U y W W U w NQ W w � 'Q (.7w Z �z� Z Kw w
_¢ W
W 2 a m a ON p
U~ .Iw ZLL �000 F'o?COOp
N O
} mad I gUao gwyS�oQ it
o>oz�U
N N
Z� N m Q
N ~ ~
z p y O o z O
w
F
\ �LL ♦ wU� w r Q� w
it z a S � wo�p > >wo¢p >
'+� `. N co w. W a s W� a
' �'' W w¢ ad z J w¢ z
o mom<x
¢Nww�NQww(J U
z M.
LL m
\,.;��y - *; `�s • iwz¢oj Viw z¢w?.
t; gwaN
r oo �gwahoo
i+.t a�x¢zrc n�xaz�
�za
Z W Z N
Attachr
y� J U
W
?. Q
� J
Of z
% — — g U
00
UO
LLLU
0 �s azCL
ILL_. Z / z n J�
0
O C9 N
®® Q 0'
"anus U N
W Z_ C7
� � U
Odco
\ U ,
QW I a s a
\ \ Z
\ \ ov
\\ �O a e-
_S_:__
�C}
\ \ N o
Z
\ LD Z Z
�aE _
of J U \\
Went D
7lm4�o ��� m[�mp��q�m� OOp00
\4,� 06 0� • 1. . .. .
W
L} M
� pae� .&��� o
r � .
°(Sc6 Pm�mon�� c odm�a
s
o° IP
� irs
AA
p }LuW �o;
OC3 m s a o W r
hap nm Qv� 'J m Z 2
r - �
_J
Jam
z
y
1n+/MfAq� Ab sd
4
L)
yy teaa
In
LZ
Ll
I
I _J
_J
n ti
c,
I r-----�} Z
L____J L_J•,j L_____— W
U
a
a
Z -J
L__J
fr o I
`--
__________
-
U
�; W \
L--__-__-__
n
C] I,
a
�
=tip
I
W
L �
y
C]
�—J
Gill
4
.p
a
I aVOH AlNno3
L_J
w� L.
IPJo
C 7 o V LJ LLB e
o no
/i
----------------------------------------
7 �
f
/r o
o c
0 ° .
0
W
------------ O o w
E
p O
/ O
I �
u Cn 7
/Gf b
\ - L a
I
\
N
W
Z 0
1 H N o
1 / I 2 K U
J_
x
fir,
�3 �� o 'b � •g � e
W f
a
Z Wo
Qo ?"Wh
—y N Z N-\,7q
96 AVMHOIH
7-a v9
LID
FLEM
ZUT
r^"�, �tTrii
���► aG3�1 Rom, F°,
'1
le
AD
'.0
Nissan: ra. lruY
wzl
YYYVVVjjj
�i
0
ow
zzx
o
14
4
�I
�� en
I
�"
fir► A �.
_-
�'
LL
�iiii�u.ru■■�ri�i ���
..
pt
/LOW
IL A
,c
�1
N
Y
z
W
W
zF
_ Qa
xw
zz
zum
wQm_
�wS
m � W
rc�
�z
t w z
az
Qw
N
z
If'J =
Q
Y
>
7 F
f
y O
Y a
I. -Cc
J
m
w Qa
CQ IL
i
ax rA
LLI
-
- @ E u E a m d@ c
m
ZD
-n -O'w^r.Eo�- ana m'°
norm F P2 npa C- nEcyy 'a `oEv �' c =P
o 0
j n-ci"_j2
3 m 3
a
O
W
r t 2 7
Vco _ 2 t€ ; z e mt s .s N s y d ..
Z •� - - C aF E C A.Q ` - d C Q m
yLLJc2_• P E; i u �' c d.� E $E C ��°e' u 7 Y C
C u c m > u ? r y a ` u m C v _
G J c°� _ m. L J B=_> a d u F 8 m o li W= N U m m U f m
z
z
_2Q Y
°� O YO
Y W w O
O >O
t
Z o6 T OP B
9 0
oa
SPINE
ROAD a
=a
THUMB€s
ROAD
C
o d d c
rc z / \ c IL
c
C r z 2 \-35� \ W
w
_ W O 2
Y 210 d 'O z0 \ '6 lL yptt
� z J C C
Y
W z w Z YZ Q y.Z Zi
Bt
O U �0 Od X`„�o}3 O ti .
0
5.2 .1W 0_
>00
f LLm
N� Vsa�i QC
2w _ �wwa� =0
Wi �w Z. �i
Po - Fw�� 2z z W. m
0 WG 'aw o DO 001~
Qowsi OWI
wa Nrcw u OaUQi 2QX
Q�u Dq CW
m Y Wy Wxorc 0
7
W O �rc 6.x QO 2pwoi 7N
2 U jQ Y��._ �U'o
OoNo
Hno�i y�
~ W 0 LLa
yi
z ie w� zo� aLL�o yrc
0.2
O a� � >�wWR �oWy as
Z ?is O=ma rcPi res / �:
'�.L — /------- -j • I • C Y
V---- O F
\ /LU
\ O LL
\ I
I •
\ \ I f-r O
�•_� \\ w I L1
i
\ I of
� w
� E
\` Q
aOf ° v
\ w� Zz> a>
I Q00 'ggo " U eI I ��G m CO 7
I z I Q W O w W Q N
} 30 i 24'U JNK <w@`-
I{ H I W2aF C
1 m O 2
1 / Z J w
C
/ G W W
O JW LL'
/ 1 Z Q w O
\ ��♦
Ifi
— —C� -- O60
uCjiDU�O uup u as / •� .� \
-� u vuu uy� \
� • QJJ .Scy'�'eA�23� f� �s / / / � �a��
J cOJ �a cy r• J e> % i oil
AGENDA ITEM - 3B
75 Years
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 22, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Jessica Jagoe, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Cities for Safe and Stable Communities Phase II
Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source:
$0 To Be Determined General Fund
Council Should Consider
Council should discuss the Phase II proposal for participation in the Cities for Safe and Stable
Communities coalition and provide direction to staff on next steps.
Background
At the March 9tn work session, the City Council gave direction to staff to join as a full member
the coalition for the Cities for Safe and Stable Communities (CSSC). This is a nonpartisan
coalition of city -led groups of Minnesota local governments coordinating around public safety,
operational stability, and the local impacts of recent federal actions. As part of their initiative,
the coalition was asking federal and state elected officials for immediate de-escalation and
acknowledgement of economic harms, including potential 2026 relief funds to cities. The
coalition is focused on local governance, public safety, and effective intergovernmental
coordination. Participation does not require lobbying, litigation, or public advocacy unless a city
independently chooses to engage in those activities. This coalition had an initial contract with
Momentum Advocacy to provide services to support these efforts and coordinate
communications.
The Executive Team for CSSC surveyed the members and heard feedback that participating
cities saw the value of trusted relationships, rapid communication, and the ability to organize
quickly around issues that impact the effective governance, safety, and day-to-day functioning of
communities across the state. Therefore, a Phase II approach was developed to engage
Momentum Advocacy in a 12-month contract. This flat fee of $30,000 would be divided equally
among the participating cities. Under Phase II, there is no longer the option to participate as a
full member or ally member. In Phase II, the approach is that participation would be as a full
Page 1 of 2
member only. At last count, I understand that 26 cities were participating as full members. It
was shared by CSSC that, to date, no cities have dropped from their participation in Phase II.
Phase II Proposal description:
Phase II model represents a broader shift toward preparedness, information sharing, and
coordinated response capacity related to federal decisions affecting local government.
The proposed structure is intentionally lightweight during normal operations, while
preserving the relationships, communication channels, and organizational framework
needed to scale coordination quickly if circumstances require it. The goal is to maintain
readiness without creating unnecessary complexity, duplication, or mission creep.
This model is intended to:
• Maintain a standing network of trusted city leaders
• Preserve the coalition's ability to respond quickly to emerging issues
• Support coordination on matters impacting multiple communities across Minnesota
• Fill in gaps where organizations, such as the League of Minnesota Cities (LMC), Metro
Cities, CGMC, are not weighing in
• Remain intentionally lightweight during baseline operations while allowing for rapid
scaling during elevated response periods
If Council decides to continue participation in CSSC for Phase II, the coalition has changed the
city representative structure to require participating cities to select the one elected representative
of the City for the coalition. In Phase I, the Mayor was determined to be the representative of the
City. In the next phase, the cities determine their representative, with the Mayor as the default,
or the spot can be delegated to a councilmember. The City Administrator/Manager role
continues in the same capacity. Council should discuss appointment of a representative/liaison
for the coalition. Based on Council discussion, staff would bring forward to the next regular
meeting to amend the 2026 City Council Liaison Appointments to include the CSSC
appointment.
Budget Impact
Based upon participation of full members under Phase I (i.e. 26 cities), the cost for Phase II is
estimated to be $1,100 - $2,000. Final fees are determined by the number of cities participating
in the coalition. This was not previously included in the budget but will not adversely affect the
budget.
Attachment
Attachment A: CSSC Phase II Proposal
Page 2 of 2
Attachment A
CSSC Phase II Proposal: Coordinated Response
Model
Purpose
The Cities for Safe and Stable Communities (CSSC) coalition was originally formed to help
Minnesota communities coordinate during a period of significant federal activity and
uncertainty affecting local government operations. Through that experience, participating cities
saw the value of trusted relationships, rapid communication, and the ability to organize quickly
around issues that impact the effective governance, safety, and day-to-day functioning of
communities across the state.
As federal actions and policy decisions continue to create potential operational, legal, financial,
and governance impacts for cities, member communities have expressed interest in maintaining
a modest but durable statewide coordination structure. Rather than remaining focused on any
single issue or event, this Phase II model represents a broader shift toward preparedness,
information sharing, and coordinated response capacity related to federal decisions affecting
local government.
The proposed structure is intentionally lightweight during normal operations, while preserving
the relationships, communication channels, and organizational framework needed to scale
coordination quickly if circumstances require it. The goal is to maintain readiness without
creating unnecessary complexity, duplication, or mission creep.
Proposed Coordinated Response Model
The Coordinated Response model is intended to:
• Maintain a standing network of trusted city leaders
• Preserve the coalition's ability to respond quickly to emerging issues
• Support coordination on matters impacting multiple communities across Minnesota
• Fill in gaps where organizations, such as the League of Minnesota Cities (LMC), Metro
Cities, CGMC, are not weighing in
• Remain intentionally lightweight during baseline operations while allowing for rapid
scaling during elevated response periods
Coalition scope
Issues Appropriate for Coordinated Response
The coalition may coordinate around:
0 Federal actions affecting multiple CSSC member communities
• State actions taken in response to federal decisions that create broad operational or
governance impacts
• Issues affecting the health, safety, welfare, or day-to-day functioning of CSSC member
communities
• Significant threats to the effective governance or administration of local government
Examples may include:
• Federal enforcement activity
• Election -related concerns
• Funding disruptions
• Coordinated operational impacts affecting multiple cities
Issues Outside the Coalition Scope
The coalition would generally not engage in:
• City -specific matters
• State -only issues without a federal nexus
• Issues already being actively led by statewide associations or regional organizations
unless additional coordination or amplification is needed
Coalition operations
Operations during Baseline Status
Even during periods without an active issue, the coalition would remain operational at a low -
intensity level focused on preparedness and relationship maintenance.
Baseline operations would include:
• Monitoring emerging federal issues
• Maintaining communication channels among member cities
• Relationship -building among mayors (or designated elected) and
managers/administrators
• Occasional talking points and/or messaging around issues tracked by the coalition
• Maintenance of organizational structure
• Quarterly in -person Mayor and Manager/Administrator meetings
• Monthly update emails from Momentum to participating cities, including "no major
updates" communications when appropriate
• Monthly executive team meetings (cancelled if no active business)
Escalation & Activation
The coalition may move into an elevated coordination posture on issues that have a Federal
nexus when:
• Multiple member cities are significantly impacted by an issue
• Operational disruption, governance concerns, or public safety impacts warrant
coordination
• Existing organizations take a neutral position or are not positioned for operational
coordination
Any member city may request consideration of elevated coordination. The anticipated
activation pathway would be:
1. Member city request or emerging issue identified by Momentum
2. Consultant analysis and recommendations
3. Executive Team review and make a recommendation to mayors
4. Manager/Administrator briefing
5. Recommendation to Mayors for final decision
Communications & Transparency
During baseline operations, coalition communications would generally remain limited and
strategic. Public -facing communication efforts would occur as appropriate based on issue
relevance and coalition direction.
Organizational Structure of CSSC
The intent is to preserve agility and avoid creating a burdensome or overly formal governance
structure.
Executive Team
The coalition would maintain a small Executive Team consisting of city managers/administrators.
• Approximately seven managers/administrators
• Voluntary participation
• Preference for geographic and city demographic diversity
• Periodic rotation over time while maintaining some continuity
Elected Representation by cities on the coalition
0 One elected representative per city
• Mayor is default; spot can be delegated to a council member
• Cities determine their own representative
Consultant Support
Consultant Services during Baseline Status
The coalition would continue retaining consultant support to assist with:
• Monitoring and tracking emerging issues
• Preparing monthly written updates
• Supporting Executive Team meetings
• Drafting brief talking points and messaging materials, as needed
• Coordinating quarterly in -person coalition meetings
• Providing strategic communications support as requested
Consultant Services during Elevated Response
During active response periods, consultant services would scale similarly to the support model
utilized during Metro Surge.
Consultant Oversight
The consultant would be managed by two designated Executive Team members, ideally
including the city holding the contract.
Funding Structure
Proposed Budget
• $30,000 flat annual consultant contract for the initial 12-month period
• Structure and funding reviewed annually
Cost Allocation
• Equal cost -sharing among participating cities
Membership Structure
• Participation would occur on an "all in/all out" basis during baseline operations
• Additional cities could join during elevated response periods with an expectation of
contributing to associated costs
Participation Expectations
Baseline Status
Participating cities would be expected to:
• Receive and review coalition communications
• Participate in quarterly meetings
• Share feedback and emerging concerns
• Keep local elected officials informed as appropriate
Elevated Response
Participation during elevated response periods would scale based on the issue and would
generally mirror the collaborative model used during Metro Surge.
Success Measures
The success of the Coordinated Response model should be evaluated based on:
• Coalition preparedness
• Continued participation and engagement
• Strength and continuity of relationships
• Relevance to member communities
• Executive Team activity and responsiveness
• Value provided by consultant support
Annual assessment of whether staying in formal coalition continues to meet member needs and
whether adjustments are warranted.
Executive Team for Phase 11
• Mike Funk— Minnetonka
• Kim Keller —St. Louis Park
• Devin Massopust — New Brighton
• Katie Rodriguez — Richfield
• Noah Schuchman — Golden Valley
• Zach Walker — Bloomington
• Kevin Watson — Vadnais Heights
AGENDA ITEM - 3C
75 Years
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 22, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
Jessica Jagoe, City Administrator
FROM: Jake Reilly, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Sign Ordinance - Election signs
Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source:
N/A N/A N/A
Council Should Consider
Council should consider and provide direction on a preferred approach to regulating the time,
place, and manner of display of elections -related signs and related enforcement.
Background
In reviewing the materials prepared by the zoning code update consultant relating to signs, the City
Council expressed interest in and concern for additional clarity in the zoning code regarding
enforcing the time, manner, and placement of election signs. Historically, city staff have spent time
responding and reacting to complaints about the placement of election signs, specifically regarding
the safe placement of signs in, on, or near the rights of way. Concerns have been raised that the
code language is not clear enough to provide sufficient guidance to candidates, property owners,
and residents in general and that the amount of time spent handling complaints may, at times, be
excessive.
Discussion
From a legal standpoint, political signs represent the highest degree of protected speech, and the
International Municipal Lawyers Association (IMLA), which crafted a model sign code following
the U.S. Supreme Court decision Reed v. Town of Gilbert (2015)1, which necessarily balanced an
earlier decision in City of Ladue v. Gilleo (1994)2 recommends an adopting jurisdiction should
1 Reed v. Town of Gilbert is a landmark Supreme Court case that ruled municipal sign ordinances imposing stricter regulations
on religious signs than other types of signs are unconstitutional content -based restrictions on free speech.
z City of Lodue v. Gilleo (1994) is a landmark Supreme Court case that ruled municipal ordinances prohibiting homeowners from
displaying any signs on property except for residence identification, for sale signs and signs warning of safety hazards was a
content -based restriction that abridged homeowners' First Amendment rights. It was not a time, place and manner restriction
because there was no viable substitute for this unique medium of expression.
exercise extreme caution in limiting a person's right to express positions on issues or candidates.
In adopting regulations, IMLA recommends, the time during which the signs may be authorized
must not be so short as to prevent the message from being delivered. In keeping with case law, the
government retains the right to regulate the time place and manner of expression and the right to
protect public safety, property values and aesthetics. The balance weighs in favor of free
expression and reasonable time restrictions are consistent with the First Amendment and
reasonable manner restrictions are consistent with the First Amendment. Taken together, a
reasonable limit on the size, location and duration of this form of expression can be consistent with
the First Amendment.
Minnesota Statutes Chapter 211B. Fair Campaign Practices offers clear direction to municipalities
regarding the timing of election season, and that noncommercial signs of any size or number must
be allowed during election season:
" 211 B.045 NONCOMMERCIAL SIGNS EXEMPTION. All noncommercial signs of any
size may be posted in any number beginning 46 days before the state primary in a state
general election year until ten days following the state general election. Municipal
ordinances may regulate the size and number of noncommercial signs at other times." 3
The League of Minnesota Cities (LMC) offers some guidance to municipalities seeking to regulate
campaign yard signs, given the potential for controversy and complaints being brought to city
ha114, including that cities cannot necessarily require campaign signs to be removed after election
season, which would be considered a content -based regulation. Campaign signs that meet a city's
location, size, and number regulations can remain displayed after election season ends.
Further, statute outlines election day prohibitions, including that a person must not: wear, exhibit,
or distribute any item that displays names, numbers, likenesses, logos, slogans, subjects of ballot
questions and/or candidates appearing on the ballot. For the purposes of the statute, "item" includes
signs. From a municipal regulations perspective, this section of statute applies to property that may
abut, adjoin, or be adjacent to a property used as a polling place in that the signs may not be placed
within 100 feet of the building in which a polling place is situated and anywhere on the public
property on which a polling place is situated. Statute also prohibits campaign signs within 100 feet
of the building where absentee voting takes place during the absentee voting period.
Generally speaking, a city's sign ordinance should acknowledge the election season preemption
required by state law, allow noncommercial signs of any size or number during election season,
and address the 1995 case, Brayton v. City of New Brighton5 which states a "noncommercial
opinion sign" is one which "does not advertise products, goods, businesses, or services and which
expresses and opinion or other point of view." Courts consider campaign signs a subset of
noncommercial opinion speech.
Ultimately, regulating signs must not address content, should avoid total bans on noncommercial
lawn signs in residential areas, and may implement general limitations on the number and size of
signs given those limits address the reasonable nature of a municipality's interest in protecting
property values, preventing distractions or hazards for drivers, or avoiding clutter.
In an effort to minimize temporary signs as a potential public nuisance and public safety issue,
including election signs, all temporary signs should be treated the same, subject to the conditions
s https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/211B.11 (accessed June 2026)
4 The Sign of the Times: A Guide to Campaign Sign Regulations - League of Minnesota CitieF (accessed June 2026)
s Brayton v. City of New Brighton, 519 N.W.2d 243 (Minn. App. 1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1036, (1995)
Page 2 of 4
above related to the start of election season and prohibition on proximity of signs or campaign
materials in, on, or near polling places and early voting locations.
Based on adopted code language in surrounding and neighboring municipalities (Attachment A),
including enforcement mechanisms, the most common pattern is private -property -only placement
with owner consent, paired with a right-of-way ban, enforced through the city's general
nuisance/impoundment process rather than a sign -specific penalty.
The following provisions are offered for consideration:
Re u�Q time, manner, and place of temporary sib
All municipalities are bound to elements established in governing state law and case law, including
the provision mentioned above that all noncommercial signs of any size may be posted in any
number beginning 46 days before the state primary in a state general election year until 10 days
following the state general election. The statute also bars campaign signs within 100 ft of a building
where absentee and/or early voting occurs and on Election Day. This statute overrides any more -
restrictive local ordinance during that window, in every city in this comparison, whether or not the
city's own code text references it. Municipal ordinances may regulate the size and number of
noncommercial signs at other times, including during years where there may not be a state general
election.
State statute associated with Rights of Way (Minn. Stat. §§ 160.27, 173.15) bars placing signs in
a state/county/city road right-of-way without the road authority's permission, and the Outdoor
Advertising Control Act bars advertising on utility poles, trees/shrubs, or painted on rocks/natural
features. MnDOT actively removes political signs from state highway ROW each election cycle.
The following provisions are most common among neighboring communities, with notes where
the existing Arden Hills code differs:
• Must not be located within any public right-of-way whether dedicated or owned in fee
simple or as an easement
o This is different from the provision in code today which allows non -governmental
signs in the rights of way.
• A cap on non -election temporary/noncommercial sign size
• A cap on the number of temporary signs per property (outside election season)
Enforcing time, manner, and placement of temporary signs
Generally speaking, neighboring communities rely on provisions found in the municipality's
general chapters associated with mitigating nuisances and property maintenance, the use of rights
of way, and code enforcement regulations.
The following provisions are most common among neighboring communities:
• Temporary signs that do not comply with this Code must be removed immediately.
o This offers a path toward removing hazards created by signs of all kinds at any
time, regardless of the time of year or the nature of the sign
• A sign impoundment/removal-and-storage mechanism for signs found to violate right-of-
way and public property violations.
• Processing violations through the general public nuisance ordinance.
Less common, but found in more than two cities, are provisions related to ordinance violations
that range from each day the violation exists constituting a separate offense; classifying said
violations as misdemeanors and preventing the illumination of temporary and/or residential signs.
Page 3 of 4
Budget Impact
The potential budget impacts generally relate to the frequency, nature, and impact to staff time
responding to and investigating complaints about signs.
Attachments
A. Table showing common approaches across Ramsey County suburban communities
B. Comparison table of temporary, including election, sign regulations and enforcement
approaches (3 pages)
C. Presentation
Page 4 of 4
Ln
O
V_
.i
7
C
m
L
N
C
7
O
U
E
m
1=
H
O
Lu
a
Ln
to
m
w
Q.
Q.
a
A
C
d
7
L
LL
H
O
2
10
to
m
N
N
CO
N
m
w
m
m
N
a
S
>
>
>
>
S
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
S
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
S
>
>
>
>
>
O
w
3 w
O
E
c
>
O O
m
C
O
N f0
_
T Ul
\
o o
x
`w
m
v
m
3
o
a
v
n
on
o
w
o,
u y
ou .3
.o
o 0
o w
o
E
c
c
E �-
v
m
o
w v
o c
E
o
n x
r
w
'> w
E
o c
c
U
c
v c
N
5
L^ o
2 m
00
1O n
o
o v w
E o
' c
n
._ c o
`o E
c
=
`-'
a o.
`O
c
o
u c
"
c noa
u n%
v
—�
E
Ec
E
w ° m
i 3
in v a
w
w v v
vEi m
z
z
0 z
> a
w
>
> Z
o
a ° EBE
=
W
o
u
-
- c
E o
��
E c E
m v.- o a
._
Q
ovoovEo�o
c3 = o
_
o
E c
m-
_ E y E t `zg
o _
w `w � E l
r
'
° o° o c` E a
a
E o=
E c E o E° v E n
E E _ °°
c
o
E
m
E a
E E E
E
> E c r E
o E E.m 3
r E
u m a 'm v 3 a o
u O E z``o
m.
E
E o
ww
n `°_
-
E
E oo
° c
c '
oo
3
o
o w
E m u N
v o v-
:�
o 3 oa
j a a
w o o' n
a .3
e
a
_
c '
o
o
n w E
oc
G q E>
`m
c A o
E c° v>
t; c
3
c`w
E& '� 2
-- E
Eb
a
L Z o
w
o « A- a o° w
m
_ E E
o
-• 3o E> E 3 'vE
N
P: 3 a 3
-K
I °
o `o
CD_
_-
10 c
V'o
o
01
d
£
E o
'o o w
C ao
a
c
r'
- 3 oc
3
1.
2
o f `� E a
. I - �z v
E r
wN _ °`o ¢ m
C a
- 6 r t
o, ° E 1O E 3
£ c t
o
3 o
w m 3
m
c r a —
o
O e
E n
a
z L°i - a«
3
>
N
d
- E 3 ° o o E o j v
o°' --
- .
to
o E 3
E
a
nEt% 3a _
m;oa >Ea
-
o
E_
_nE
3
G
o o
Y
c r
.o E
.n
` v
t4
O e
._
r
u- - m o
m
c o
Tc°, o
z
- - 3 n« 3_
o
zE -
- n E"
£
3 A
_
n t
o G
N a
-
a m
bA e
a °
c' E r
w
v
t
E°
-
-
_
n m
00Z
_ -
E a
E a43
e
L a
'
3 co
O.
a
- m E
.2 -
- - -
y o
'o
c
C
o
N
v
a`
o
3
z
• «
k§
ƒ
oo
�\
\\\\\\\/\k
\}\\\i
\\}\�\\�\\\
.
-- -
!I°!!|
_
_ _ _
__
!!!!;[f{]§j
\\}\}}\\\
\\\/\�
/\}\\\ \\/\k
\\
\\
'}
o
o
;{
!!o
!] !
o
, �[
}?)
\)//
o
\\\}\
\\
zw
&»�;li
:j-- ;®
_
:
_!;!§:7}
} \}}\
\\\}\\\\\\
\j\\\\}\.
. P: 3:
!!;;!|!!@|
|i7!$;i;#
4.
\\
\�\\\\\/o
�}
\\\
\\\ \\\\\}}
/\\}\\
-(\k t! o
/7| § ` ``_
r!§«f
`°° 2!; _ -
- -
[;{(!7
\ \\\\\ \\\ }\\\�\
\\\\\\ \\_\\\\}
\//§_\}
_ _ §k{I.
`
- kJ§\_
-
_o
\ /} /-
_ -_
\
- -
o
\/}
zu EZ
z 7F>E
2
!
|
wi H
E 3
-
o
o
80
= m>a
g
-
vo
v u
Nzam
_
-
u
Z.moZ
o «
U
o ZZ
ue,
uz
rA oo
ur ma
>E=E
s
E
o 0 ° o v-
m a E o
.3 m m
o E
o f
a
Y
E
o. -
z' c
E c E E E o E0 -6
m
° o 4 °' E¢ r c
0 o E
mm
o 3
- c r
-
n 3
— E =Eon
_
aE„ E
u° o w__
_ m a r& o f ^
a x01Fi
oca
z
-
E
mEo
3m
1.
E
E
u Ev`
w
E s
o
E 3
-
-
r
mo
3
=
o
L .3 E
_—o
Ev
_
coEo
o
E5�
=°' Oo�
-
--o o.
o
m
- - V
w n
c E° -
E' w
__
o y v-
E' 3_
'�°
E`
vE
° 0 3
w E E v- 3E
s
�E °
_
lo
r z o
t c >,
w o
- _
an
�vd�°N°E2
_ _=o
oo
- 3 a 3
F m
�
�
o
G
o
Ems-°
w E N
-
-
mE
_o
_
_ E -E c.c
3
1 1
_
1 = a E 3 E
3
_ cq
o
m_ Q E a c
3
c E
= w E
E n _
°: E
o
o
'. ;
n .3
a
__
3 `g a r
E°
a
o o f a
n
c
_
3
E_
N
o
_
ao
_
n c
-
_E p
3 o
E
c
-
Nw 3 - °`o -
Law c o o l
°^ E a _
w 000 ,T_, o o c
a
--_a=E._t�o
is
Boa=
a - a� m
o
G 9
o w u o o
m° w
o "' °1
-
z 'w - - _
_
go
g
r $
°
Eo
o
o c
a
_
o
-
d
3 c o
m
Vi
a
m
p
m
a
c
rc
c
>
o
v
2
Attachment C
1
•0
Ei
+-+
O
O
_0
•
.�
co
VJ
C:
cn
O
U
•�
�
0
O
Co
C:-0
Co
U
,0
O
4
c6
-0
• O
c6
cn
Q
i
�
O
N
H--
c
E
• (n
O
16
U
�
�
O
tD
O
.4-j
fn
co
Z
i
CU
O
0
—
U
CU
>,
U
a
O
o
cc
m
U
LL
m
V J
•� VJ
M .
O"
� C6
U
a�
O E
O O
'�, U
co C-
O
Q
cn a-
co
O CS CU
U N
C6
to N cn
cn N
0 O
i O U
cn +� 0 cn
O N U) O
C U C -;,-
O bA .O M
.+J - cn
CB U N
>
> U O
W cn U
b�0
.cn
co
•i
E
E
O
O
c6
O
O
cn
U �
mmi
Cu
O b4
U �
U
U
co O
N U
O �
U O
c
N
co N
��
0
N �
CZCU
o
y� i
` uo
� � U
O O i
CZ N
co U co
co U
cB4---o
� U
O Ca
N
O i
( O
cu
mi
cu
O
cn
►7
A
—
bA
N � �
O
� U U Co
O
Q co
kZ
Q.
Lu
N
L.< m : •�
����
co Q)
z Nc,CIJ
CO
co �, i U N
J N
M L-Z
CC c L.-z O
— N
§CO co N O -- co b.o ,4.—
Q CT3 O N O
U
Z a Q) v Z
Q N�
� o �
W •O
NQq°C
R.
0
N
m
co
co
U
U
m
N
cn
Z3
CO
0
co
.j
Q)
a
Dc
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
a
_
_
�
om
E
_
°
E
_
,
E
`
E
E
3
E
-
E
-
E
�
E
10-
-
° o
`o
'>
E
-
14
EO
a E-
E
E
'6
v
E
0 2 "6 E E
E
E
S
r o
t 'E6
6. E
.6.2
26 E I
8;2 o 4
a 2
qu E
E
E
oE
E
E E
J
E
E E E
\\
\ \
E E
E E
a E /}
-*e I t
EE
k
E
19
.0
t
.0
t
w E
\ \�
}
\�
'E &
\�
\\9)\�
\\�
;
� \ /
\\\
))} k}
/\�
/
I o
\�
\\ \�
\
�
h/
��
y
Egol
E
w
g
\/
}}S
k\ 8 E IE
q{�}9 �
}\/ \\}\\
\�\}\
\\\\\
\\\\
\��\}}
B
E 'E
9 E
E
E E
EU
E
EO
yo
eE
at
~ter o13
f 2
qg
^L
W
C
Ecc
c6
U
co
—
•(�
Cc
•V
Q
N
�
E
Ca
(3)
E
(�
E
Ov
• co
L-
.—
O
c
4
to
O
c6
co
c�
V
n
O
..
cn
�
N
U
•—
cn
cc
O
O
Q
•cn
E
c6
co
U
>'
a- J
�p
Q
�A
.C/)
co
Q
E
a)
O
N
E
N
Ca
Q
E
O
a)
O
co
N
c6
cn
cn
O
cn
c6
0
O
D
O
O
ate-+
D
O
a�
co
C6
Q
C6
c
O
U
N
O
cn
c
� O
� U
co
O
co
= N
c6
N }'
co
cn
U N
.161,
CU
cc
O
Q
CB
O
cc
.cc
E
O
ca
O
U
n>
>
a--'
N �
� O
c6
MIZE
bu0
c6 O
L— a--j
o Co
}' O
C6 O
0-0
E
O
E cn O
_0 a) •+-- i
C: cn Co
O�•0
0 +� >
E >
O },
a�
cc: E
cn O
c 0-
c�
��.0
cn
W E Q
0
a)
U
0
^L
4-J
U
c6
O
CO
O
cu
O
0
.Cl)
o C/)
a) O
-0.+—j
Z3cu
U �
U)
.
W
4-J
4�-
O
U
co
O
a) �
U �
co
c U
O
co J
to
^L
W
a� ca
o
to c6
D
O
co
cn
.O
0
ca
a� .cn
� J
U },
O cn
U W
}J
C6 O
'-^J --J
VJ cu
'� VJ
� CU
O E
U
O
� U
O �
cn O
CU �
cn
O O
0 0
cn
C` • C:
O O
.c cn
Ocn
O
0-0 0-
0 O U
U O U
0 C^U
'0
V J _0 cn
J
0 O 0
CU � CU
Q 0 Q
N
E
U
L-
O
w
W
CU O
U co
O
Q
bA E
O
m U
CU CU
Q E
O O
cn
c6 O
� CU
C6
.+-J
cn U
co
> O
O �
• > CU
cnO
o- Co
W }'
co
c6 Q
O
O U
i`
u
AGENDA ITEM - 3D
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 22, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Jessica Jagoe, City Administrator
SUBJECT: City Council Code of Conduct/Norms of Behavior Discussion
Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source:
N/A N/A N/A
Council Should Consider
Council should review Resolution 2016-022 for City Council Norms of Behavior and provide
direction to Staff on next steps.
Background
At the April 14th Work Session, the City Council reviewed Resolution 2016-22 which is the City
Council Norms of Behavior. Council requested that staff verify if the League of MN Cities had a
template Code of Conduct policy that could be a starting point for this discussion. Additionally,
there was a reference to the Elected Officials Guide that LMC also produces. Staff were asked to
gather some of these resources together and share those with the Council for future discussion.
LMC states that generally policies will take one of two forms: either a values statement
expressing core principles for ethical conduct or a formal code of conduct. From the Minnesota
Mayors Handbook produced by the League of Minnesota Cities there is the following
suggestion:
Codes of conduct are written more like bylaws or regulations for an organization.
Generally, they prescribe explicit standards of behavior and provide for formal
complaints, hearings, and censure. For example, a code of conduct might state, "No
member may knowingly violate the Open Meeting Law."
Included as Attachment D is a sample Code of Conduct created by the League of Minnesota
Cities Ethics Advisory Panel from the Minnesota Mayors Handbook. Additionally, City staff is
including as Attachment E the Blaine City Council Code of Conduct.
Page 1 of 2
For Resolution 2016-22, the City Council should review to determine if this remains sufficient or
provide Staff with direction on updates for the Norms of Behavior.
Budtet Impact
N/A
Attachments
Attachment A: Resolution 2016-22
Attachment B: January 3, 2024 Special Work Session Minutes
Attachment C: April 14, 2025 Work Session Minutes
Attachment D: LMC Sample Code of Conduct
Attachment E: Blaine City Council Code of Conduct
Page 2 of 2
Attachment A
-z3 [� HILLS
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 2016-022
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING CITY COUNCIL NORMS OF BEHAVIOR
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL THAT THE NORMS OF
BEHAVIOR ARE HEREBY ESTABLISHED AS FOLLOWS:
1. Speak only for yourself, not for other Councilmembers — unless specifically tasked by your
colleagues to speak for the group.
2. Don't question motives. Assume others have positive intentions, even when you disagree.
3. Be respectful of one another, and the public process, at all times. Do not criticize Staff or others
in public.
4. Aim of consensus, but accept decisions of the majority once made.
5. Stay focused on the elected official role — policy, prioritization, and citizen representation.
6. Work primarily through the City Administrator or a Department Head, and through line staff with
prior arrangement. May work with the writer of a memo in a packet to request information for
clarification. Refrain from attending staff meetings, trainings, "rides -along" or group staff
functions unless specifically invited or cleared by the City Administrator.
7. Respect Staff and the fact that they work for the Council as a whole. Don't expect or ask them to
engage in the fray (secrets, gossip, triangulation), make your individual case (to take sides), or to
be your "insider" (informant).
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS THIS 27th
DAY OF DUNE, 2016.
David Grant, gayor
TT T:.
J ie Hanson, City Clerk
'It Attachment B
,-ARZEN HILLS
Approved: February 12, 2024
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA
SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
JANUARY 3, 2024
5:30 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY HALL
CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Grant called to order the Special City
Council Work Session at 5:30 p.m.
Present: Mayor David Grant, Councilmembers Brenda Holden, Emily Rousseau,
Tena Monson and Tom Fabel
Absent: None
Also present: City Administrator Dave Perrault and League of Minnesota Cities Insurance
Trust (LMCIT) Collaboration Services Manager Aimee Gourlay
1. AGENDA ITEMS
A. Council Discussion with LMCIT Collaboration Services
Ms. Gourlay said the goal is to give them the opportunity to discuss what they might like to do or
change about the Norms of Behavior/Code of Conduct, and what the process would be for
moving forward. She reviewed the items they hope to achieve; productive and efficient Council
meetings, improved teamwork and agreement on process. She asked if anyone wanted to add
anything else.
Council also requested to talk about respect and decency.
Ms. Gourlay said she would add that under meeting management. She explained the agenda and
said she had brought a short Code of Conduct summary from the League of Minnesota Cities. She
said the League doesn't have a standard code as they are specific to each community. Some cities
have very detailed codes and Duluth has one paragraph. She expanded on the items they would be
discussing. The idea was to share and hear others ideas and incorporate as many considerations as
they could. The goal of a Code of Conduct is to increase their ability to have positive conflict that
helps get good outcomes, and decrease the likelihood of interpersonal negative conflicts that can
detract from making good decisions.
Ms. Gourlay explained the Norms of Behavior 2016 could be a starting point because it already
exists. Discussion was probably more important than the paper at this point.
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION - JANUARY 3, 2024 2
Council discussed issues in the past related to processes and how they have or have not come to
agreement on items.
Ms. Gourlay said it was about perceptions and how you're feeling about the discussion. What
they seem to agree on the need to balance the meeting efficiency with making sure everyone's
voice is heard and making sure the conversation is appropriate to the topic. They could talk about
how to move on when all opinions have been voiced. If they feel like they're hearing the same
thing and want to move on for efficiency sake, how does the Mayor know?
Council discussed how side comments or underhanded remarks affect decorum.
Ms. Gourlay said you're probably not listening well if there are side comments, and people will
shut down if they're hearing things as attacks. That is a part of meeting decorum. It can be
difficult if Councilmembers are speaking for long periods of time. So how do they balance
making sure everyone has a voice? Maybe everyone says their initial thoughts and has longer to
speak after that.
Ms. Gourlay thought there was already a divide about how they were feeling about respect. She
wondered if only some people were experiencing that or if it was a council -wide consideration.
Council discussed past issues or events that they have felt contributed to feelings of disrespect or
mistrust.
Ms. Gourlay thought getting to a point of understanding that could be another piece of the code.
And whatever code they come up with everyone has to be willing to go along with. She watched
a video of a meeting but she didn't see much of this dynamic.
Ms. Gourlay said there may be a need to address some of the past hurt in some way however,
something that can be helpful is to look at places they've been more successful and see how they
can take what is working and build on that.
Council discussed teamwork and their perspectives on information sharing.
Ms. Gourlay stated they're talking about Code of Conduct, but it really keeps coming back to
this one issue. She asked what they needed to move forward.
Council discussed better communication moving forward and past issues, also discussed looking
forward not at the past when making decisions.
Council discussed adding agenda items to formally report back to Council, such as,
Committee/Commission updates.
Ms. Gourlay said one thing they were talking about was committee reports and separating that
from Council Comments. They also talked about agreeing to disagree about the past and not
bring it up going forward. They talked about annual committee updates and sharing City goals.
Ms. Gourlay commented that one of the things she's observing is that it's hard to get to
consensus because what they're talking about keeps shifting.
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION - JANUARY 3, 2024 3
Ms. Gourlay reiterated they wanted efficient meetings, to stay on appropriate topics, everyone's
voice be heard, and to avoid personal comments. Some of the items they are considering would
address some of that list.
Ms. Gourlay said sometimes councils have struggles with how to get things on the agenda,
what's the complaint process, or the process for taking something off the consent agenda.
Oftentimes it has to do with how things get heard. She wondered what's the process for assigning
committees, is there an assumption that everyone gets a committee and similar types of things.
Council discussed adding committee/commission reports to future agendas, and about tying it into
committee/commission liaison responsibilities.
Ms. Gourlay recommended they have a work session item for discussion of committee updates
before it be brought for a vote at a regular meeting so there is no misunderstanding of what the
policy will be. She asked if this session was a useful conversation.
Council discussed not bring up past issues when making decisions affecting the present and
future.
Ms. Gourlay said they should move forward with discussing the issues they talked about at work
sessions and if they would like her to come back she could. She could also arrange for not full
group discussions.
Ms. Gourlay said they remind her of good people with knowledge coming together from
different places but the team can't come together.
Council thanked Ms. Gourlay for her time.
2. COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS
City Administrator Perrault said he had emailed two questions to the Council. The 2024 PMP
was at 80% plan and was scheduled to be an item on the upcoming work session, did they prefer
to leave it on that meeting. Also, did they want to schedule a retreat, if so he will find a date.
Councilmember Rousseau would rather do a special work session on January 22 for the PMP,
and she would love to have a retreat in March or April.
Councilmember Monson was comfortable with having the PMP discussion on either date but
she could make January 22 work.
Mayor Grant explained there's what they go in at and then there's the bid. So, 80% was
probably close enough.
Councilmember Monson said then she was fine with it being on January 8 at 80%. She would
like to have city goals at a retreat but didn't think they needed the personality piece.
Mayor Grant felt a retreat was the wrong way to approach it. He thought it would be better for
the group to look at some strategic topics and discuss them. He didn't know if they needed
ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION — JANUARY 3, 2024 4
someone else to help them do that. He thought a facilitator would make it more touchy-feely and
they would probably waste time with ice breaker type stuff.
Councilmember Fabel agreed.
Councilmember Monson said she found Ms. Gourlay to be valuable in these discussions.
Councilmember Rousseau asked if they were going to go through the list of work session topics
at the next work session and prioritize them.
Mayor Grant was thinking more strategic than chickens or food trucks; he was worried more
about bigger things like trails and the fire station.
City Administrator Perrault said he was planning to include the list of work session priorities
on the next work session so Council can let staff know what they want to bring forward in what
order.
Councilmember Rousseau explained that things they see on the list as a priority could be what
they base a strategic plan on.
Councilmember Holden asked if they were going to update the Council Tracker.
City Administrator Perrault said past practice was they only removed things at Council
direction.
Councilmember Rousseau asked how they were moving forward with a Code of Conduct for
committees.
Ms. Gourlay said she had examples from other cities to send to the Mayor and Councilmember
Rousseau.
ADJOURN
Mayor Grant adjourned the Special City Council Work Session at 7:09 p.m.
_4j. J��J
David Grant
Mayor
Attachment C
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — APRIL 14, 2025 14
regarding how PTRC are going to pay for the parks is a priority, above some of the other items on
the list. We need to decide what is most important.
Councilmember Rosseau asked if it could be two Fridays vs. a Friday and Saturday.
Councilmember Holden can't do 14 hours. Back to back days doesn't work. In the past, it was
nice to take a step back and think about what was discussed.
Councilmember Weber asked if it had to be consecutive days.
City Administrator Jagoe didn't ask that question. Her experience was the Friday/Saturday. She
will ask if there is an option to do a Friday and then a second Friday a month later.
Councilmember Weber said he could support that, with Hue Life. He is not interested in the
other proposal.
Councilmember Holden asked when it was decided it would be a Friday.
City Administrator Jagoe said she heard Council talk about a Friday.
Councilmember Monson said they did a similar session with the Fire Board. There were three
months between sessions. We can't spread it that far because we will want this complete in time
for budgeting. It was nice to have that space between sessions.
Mayor Grant said we should try to keep the hours down, maybe not two full days.
City Administrator Jagoe will follow up with the consultant to see about scheduling two
sessions with some time between. She sought clarification if Council wanted to agree on
availability and see if it works for the consultant, or should we schedule it when they can fit us in.
Councilmember Holden said everyone needs to be at the first one.
Councilmember Weber said we will probably have to have the consultant say when they are
available and then move on it when we find a date that works for everyone.
City Administrator Jagoe said she will follow up on dates. She wanted to confirm that Council
plus the Directors and City Clerk should attend. She asked if there was anyone else that should be
included in the invitation.
Discussion ensued regarding start time, possible dates and what items will be focused on.
City Administrator Jagoe will discuss availability with the consultant and send out dates to
Council.
C. Council Norms of Behavior
City Administrator Jagoe said on March loth, this item was brought to the Work Session along
with the Committee/Commission Code of Conduct Policy. The Council Norms of Behavior,
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — APRIL 14, 2025 15
Resolution 2016-22 is being brought back for Council review. She asked Council if there are any
updates or changes, they want to make.
Councilmember Monson thinks the Norms of Behavior is a good place to start but she feels that
reading it, it was written in response to the dynamics that were happening at that time. She
provided something previously that more broadly discussed honesty and integrity. She thought we
could check with LMC to see if they have a template. She thinks the items are very specific.
Councilmember Weber said he went through all the chapters of the Elected Officials Guides on
the LMC site. He thinks the information is very comprehensive guidance for elected officials and
ethics guidance. He provided the information to City Administrator Jagoe. He requested she
share that information with the rest of the Council.
City Administrator Jagoe said she will pass that along to the entire council.
Councilmember Rousseau asked if City Administrator Jagoe would share that along with
Councilmember Holden's notes, as well.
Councilmember Holden said in item #3, there is language regarding public testimony. She
believes the word `immoral' should be removed. We shouldn't use that word. We talk about being
respectful of one another but we also have to include resident interactions.
D. Twin Cities Gateway Funding Discussion
Mayor Grant said there is just under $20,000 plus some roll-over from the previous year. He is
grateful the Visitor's Bureau allowed that. These funds need to be used to advertise and promote
events that will bring people into Arden Hills to use hotels and patronize our businesses. He
believes the ice swim event would qualify. We've used it for Rib Fest and Bethel Homecoming.
He reminded that we have the 75th Anniversary of Arden Hills coming in 2026. He asked Council
if they had any preference for prioritizing the list.
Councilmember Rousseau said she is interested in using half of the amount for Rib Fest and the
other half for the ice swim. She would like John Connelly to talk with Al Stauffacher to help
shepherd the process of the Regional Grant for the ice swim event. She understands they will do
that for a newer event. Mr. Stauffacher seemed interested in the ice swim. She said it seems like
we typically discuss this funding source in April. She wondered if the 75th Anniversary should be
on the list for next year, with all of the 2026 funds going towards that event.
Mayor Grant said that is the Council's decision to make. He said the grant awards are based on a
formula. He said the numbers are holding and we can probably expect about the same amount
next year.
Councilmember Holden would like to use a little of the 2025 money to advertise a save the date
for the 75th Anniversary. She thinks we should send out one big flyer. A mailing is $2,000. She
thinks we should send out a mailing announcing that 2026 is the 75th Anniversary. Something that
advertises us as a City to all the residents and businesses. She isn't willing to give it to Bethel.
They never even thanked us.
Mayor Grant isn't aware if Staff has received any communication.
Attachment D
For example, "I serve the public interest when I recognize and support the
public's right to know the public's business." Values -based codes generally set
aspirational "do's," while codes of conduct stress "don'ts," as discussed below.
You can find a sample Statement of Values in Appendix F at the end of this
memo.
b. Codes of conduct
See Appendix G: Sample Code Codes of conduct are written more like bylaws or regulations for an
of Conduct.
organization. Generally, they prescribe explicit standards of behavior and
provide for formal complaints, hearings, and censure. For example, a code of
conduct might state, "No member may knowingly violate the Open Meeting
Law." You can find a sample Code of Conduct in Appendix G at the end of this
memo.
C. Enforceability
i. Values statements
Because of the aspirational and sometimes subjective nature of values -based
codes, formal enforcement might be difficult and likely counterproductive.
Compliance is better left to the individual's conscience.
ii. Codes of conduct
Minn. Stat. § 410.20. Charter cities may provide for recall of elected public officials in their charter.
However, recall of public officials is not possible in statutory cities. In addition,
there is no authority in state statute to provide for removal of a council
member by vote of the council or through application of a city -based ethics
policy. There is also no authority to levy fines for violations.
As a result, city codes of conduct for elected officials are generally enforced
through censure. Censure is a formal resolution of council stating that a
council member has violated the city's ethical rules and expressing disapproval
of their actions.
IV. Mayor -council relationship
Because mayors of statutory cities lack significant individual authority, the key
to a successful mayor -council relationship often lies in recognizing the mayor's
role (and its limits) and working from there to build productive partnerships
with fellow council members.
A. Meetings and the mayor -council relationship
Minnesota
Mayors Chapter 1 -36
Association
Appendix G: Sample Code of Conduct
Created by the League of Minnesota Cities Ethics Advisory Panel — October 2009; Revised December 2017
.01. Purpose.
The City Council of the City of determines that a code of conduct for its members, as well
as the members of the various boards and commissions of the City of , is essential for the
public affairs of the city. By eliminating conflicts of interest and providing standards for conduct
in city matters, the City Council hopes to promote the faith and confidence of the citizens of
in their government and to encourage its citizens to serve on its council and commissions.
.02. Standards of conduct.
Subd. 1. No member of the City Council or a city board or commission may knowingly:
a. Violate the Open Meeting Law.
b. Participate in a matter that affects the person's financial interests or those of a business
with which the person is associated, unless the effect on the person or business is no
greater than on other members of the same business classification, profession, or
occupation.
c. Use the person's public position to secure special privileges or exemptions for the person
or for others.
d. Use the person's public position to solicit personal gifts or favors.
e. Use the person's public position for personal gain.
£ Except as specifically permitted pursuant to Minn. Stat. 471.895, accept or receive any
gift of substance, whether in the form of money, services, loan, travel, entertainment,
hospitality, promise, or any other form, under circumstances in which it could be
reasonably expected to influence the person, the person's performance of official action,
or be intended as a reward for the person's official action.
g. Disclose to the public, or use for the person's or another person's personal gain,
information that was gained by reason of the person's public position if the information
was not public data or was discussed at a closed session of the City Council.
h. Disclose information that was received, discussed, or decided in conference with the
city's legal counsel that is protected by the attorney -client privilege unless a majority of
the City Council has authorized the disclosure.
i. Represent private interests before the City Council or any city committee, board,
commission, or agency. (optional)
Subd. 2. Except as prohibited by the provisions of Minn. Stat. § 471.87, there is no violation of
subdivision 1 b. of this section for a matter that comes before the council, board, or commission
if the member of the council, board, or commission publicly discloses the circumstances that
Minnesota
Mayors 74
Association
would violate these standards and refrains from participating in the discussion and vote on the
matter. Nothing herein shall be construed to prohibit a contract with a member of the City
Council under the circumstances described under Minn. Stat. § 471.88, if proper statutory
procedures are followed.
.03. Complaint, hearing.
Any person may file a written complaint with the city clerk alleging a violation of the standards
of conduct in section _02. The complaint must contain supporting facts for the allegation.
The City Council may hold a hearing after receiving the written complaint or upon the council's
own volition. A hearing must be held only if the City Council determines:
1) upon advice of the city attorney, designee, or other attorney appointed by the council, that
the factual allegations state a sufficient claim of a violation of these standards or rise to
the level of a legally recognized conflict of interest, and
2) that the complaint has been lodged in good faith and not for impermissible purposes such
as delay.
The City Council's determination must be made within 30 days of the filing of the allegation
with the city clerk. If the council determines that there is an adequate justification for holding a
hearing, the hearing must be held within 30 days of the City Council's determination.
At the hearing, the person accused must have the opportunity to be heard. If, after the hearing,
the council finds that a violation of a standard has occurred or does exist, the council may
censure the person, refer the matter for criminal prosecution, request an official not to participate
in a decision, or remove an appointed member of an advisory board or commission from office.
Minnesota
Mayors 75
Association
BLaineMN.gov
Live I Work I Grow
rA"#:
BLAINE CITY COUNCIL - CODE OF CONDUCT
Contents
IntroductoryPledge...................................................................................................................................................2
Compliance and Enforcement.......................................................................................................................................... 2
Complywith the Law................................................................................................................................................. 2
Roles of Council, Staff and Commissions................................................................................................................... 3
Workingwith Staff............................................................................................................................................................ 4
Working with Boards/Commissions........................................................................................................................... 5
Workingwith the Community.......................................................................................................................................... 5
City Staff and the Public, Council Conduct with Staff................................................................................................ 6
Council Conduct with the Public, Internal Council Conduct..................................................................................... 7
Intergovernmental Relations........................................................................................................................................... 7
1
INTRODUCTORY PLEDGE
Blaine residents and businesses deserve a fair, ethical and accountable local government that earns the public's full
confidence for integrity. Recognizing these goals, the code of conduct is established for all elected officials of the City
of Blaine. As a member of the Blaine City Council, we agree to uphold the introductory pledge for elected officials
adopted by the city council and conduct myself by the following model of behavior. We will:
• Comply with the law, including
o Staying within the city council's authority
o Following the open meeting, gift, and conflict of interest laws
• Respect city council roles and responsibilities when working with staff, boards and commissions
• Be consistent in policy and respect process
• Fulfill the council's fiduciary responsibility to act in the best interest of the city, and all of its residents, both
financially and legally by:
o keeping the common good as the highest purpose to focus on achieving constructive solutions for the public
benefit
o not disclosing private or confidential information of the city or using that information to advance personal
interests. The mayor and councilmembers must maintain the confidentiality of all non-public information
concerning property, personnel, or legal affairs of the city. They must neither disclose confidential
information without proper legal authorization, nor use such information to advance their personal, financial
or other private interests. Such disclosure is a violation of the Rules of Order and Procedure and the Council
Code of Conduct.
o protecting city interests and liability by following advice of legal counsel
COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT
The code of conduct expresses standards of ethical conduct expected for members of the Blaine City Council.
Members themselves have the primary responsibility to assure the public that ethical standards are understood and
met, and that the public can continue to have full confidence in the integrity of government. We will hold ourselves
and each other accountable and when there is a suspected violation of the law, we will discuss with the city manager.
COMPLY WITH THE LAW
Members shall comply with the applicable federal laws, state laws, and city ordinances in the performance of their
public duties.
Authority
The city's legislative powers are granted to the council as a whole, and not to individual members. The council as a
whole is a policy -making board and as such, it is not the duty of the council to administer the day-to-day operations
of the city. Many items will come before the council as required by city ordinance, but many issues are more
discretionary in nature. It is important that the council and staff work together to differentiate between
administrative duties that are relevant to staff, and those decisions that are of a policy -making nature and should
come before the council. All councilmembers, including those serving as presiding officer, have equal votes. No
councilmember has more power than any other councilmember, and all should be treated with equal respect.
Members are elected officials serving on the city council and councilmembers shall not attempt to act as, or carry
out the responsibilities of, city staff or the city manager beyond what is outlined in the city charter and code.
Councilmembers shall not undermine the authority of the city manager and city staff as those individuals carry
out their duties as authorized by the city charter, code and the motions and resolutions adopted by majority of
the city council. Including but not limited to speaking on behalf of council or city staff, media engagement,
developers, property owners or residents without approval of a majority of council.
Mayoral Role
According to Blaine City Charter Chapter 2, Section 2.06 the mayor is a full member of the council in addition to
acting as presiding officer of meetings; representing the city ceremoniously; and executing official documents.
Open Meeting Law (OML)
Public deliberations and processes shall be conducted openly and in a transparent manner. The Minnesota Open
Meeting Law Chapter 13D requires that meetings of governmental bodies generally be open to the public in order
to:
• Prohibit actions being taken at a secret meeting where it is impossible for the interested public to become
fully informed about a public board's decisions or to detect improper influences
• Assure the public's right to be informed and observe public meetings
The Minnesota Supreme Court has noted that meetings of less than a quorum of a public body held serially to
avoid a public meeting or to fashion agreement on an issue of public business may violate the open meeting law.
Gift/Donations
Gifts from Interested Persons: Unless as outlined in exceptions, per MN Statute 471.895 councilmembers may not
receive gifts from any "interested person" in conjunction with their city council duties:
• A "gift" is defined as money, real or personal property, a service, loan, a forbearance or forgiveness of
debt, or a promise of future employment, that is given and received without the giver receiving something
of equal or greater value in return
• "Interested person" means a person or a representative of a person or association that has a direct
financial interest in a decision that a local official is authorized to make
o virtually every resident or person doing business in the city could have a direct financial interest in a
decision
Gifts to the city: councilmembers can recommend acceptance of general gifts through the city's donation policy. All
gifts to the city must be accepted by city council resolution.
Logo
Members shall not use the city's name or logo for the purpose of endorsing any political candidate or business.
Conflict of Interest
Conflict of interest is when any member who has a "financial interest" in, or who may receive a financial benefit as
a result of, any action or if there is potential for the appearance of conflict of interest. Questions about a potential
conflict of interest shall be discussed with the city manager.
Contractual Conflict of Interest: Per MN Statute 471.87, with exceptions in MN Statutes 1236.195 and 471.88, a
public officer who is authorized to take part in any manner in making any sale, lease, or contract in official capacity
shall not voluntarily have a personal financial interest in that sale, lease, or contract or personally benefit
financially therefrom.
Non -Contractual Conflict of Interest: Non -contractual matters may include such things as council decisions on
zoning, local improvements, and the issuance of licenses. Although not generally prohibited by state law, an
interested councilmember most likely should abstain from participating in council discussion and from voting on
these issues.
Members who have a potential conflict of interest shall:
• Disclose the conflict of interest to the group, and
• Abstain from the council discussion debate and vote
ROLES OF COUNCIL, STAFF AND COMMISSIONS
We are all part of a team committed to the residents of Blaine both today and in the future. To be effective we
must come to meetings with an open mind, think strategically about city issues and delegate details of
implementations to staff. We will strive to maintain a culture of trust, respect and candor as a council and when
working with staff and boards/commissions.
Decide Strategy
���yl�r.Iil"iT•il�J
Manage Operations, Advise Council
(technical analysis & evaluation) & Implement Policy
City Council City Manager and Staff
Make policy -level decisions
Hire and supervise city manager
Approve budget and related work plan
Ordinances and policy decisions
Development proposals
Variances and rezoning requests
Appoint representatives to advisory boards
and commissions
Respectful Behavior
Members should STRIVE TO:
Advise Council
(community needs & values)
Provide best efforts and technical
advice to council
Manage operations and staff
Propose budget and policies
Carry out council decisions
Deliverservices
Equitably enforce codes/policies
Treat people with courtesy, politeness, and kindness
Encourage others to express their opinions and ideas
Listen to what others have to say
Use the ideas of others to improve decisions and outcomes
Recognize and respect differences
Prepare for the issues at hand
Focus on the business of the body
Consider only legally germane information in decisions
Act as a decision maker, not an advocate
Boards, Commissions, Task Forces
Provide community perspective
Propose work plan items
Advise the council through work plan
"charges"
Hold hearings as directed by council
Assist as directed in work plan with
engagement efforts
Members should AVOID:
• Speaking over or cutting off another individual's
comments
• Insulting, disparaging, or putting down people ortheir
ideas
• Bullying other members by displaying a pattern of
belittling, demeaning, judging or patronizing comments
• Violence or the threat of violence will not be tolerated
WORKING WITH CITY STAFF
Members shall respect and adhere to the council-manager structure of Blaine city government. This means:
City Council does...
Hire, fire, and supervise city manager
Set the strategic direction for the city •
Consider and approve budget and related work plan, and monitor•
performance relative to those items
Consider and approve policy decisions •
Consider and approve development proposals •
Consider and approve variances and rezoning requests •
Appoint citizens to citizen advisory boards and commissions
Approve and amend work plans and bylaws
City Council does not...
Hire and fire staff
Direct activities of staff other than city manager
Individually direct activities of boards, commissions or
other resident groups
Individually approve policies, projects etc.
Individually commit resources or staff to specific causes
Individually enforce policies, city code, etc. or speak or
prepare official correspondence on behalf of the city
unless authorized by council
4
Councilmembers promise city staff they will:
• Respect staff as valued resources and members of our team
• Support the maintenance of a positive and constructive workplace environment for city employees where
individual members, staff and the public are free to express their ideas and work to their full potential
• Provide direction to the city manager as a body and not direct the work of individual staff
• Encourage staff to focus on the big picture in reports
• When possible, notify the city manager in advance of a council meeting of questions or requests to pull
agenda items from the consent agenda so the appropriate staff can compile the information needed
• Agree that information they ask of the city manager will be shared equally with all councilmembers
• Copy the city manager on all communications with staff, including questions on topics such as agenda items
WORKING WITH BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
As set forth in the Blaine City Charter Chapter 2, Section 2.02, Blaine's boards and commissions are established by
the council and serve as advisory to the council. Specific board and commission roles are:
• Investigate matters within the scope of the commission or as specifically directed by the council
• Advise the council by communicating the viewpoint or advice of the commission
• At the direction of council, hold hearings, receive evidence, conduct investigations, and, based on such
hearings, evidence and investigations, make decisions and recommendations to the council
Councilmembers promise boards and commissions they will:
• View boards and commissions as vitally important resources to support our decision -making
• Communicate effectively with boards and commissions to ensure they have the tools to do their work
• Give clear direction as a body and take adequate time to review the result of their deliberations
• Because of the value of the independent advice of boards, commissions, and task forces to the public
decision -making process, members of council shall refrain from using their position to influence the
deliberations or outcomes of board, commission, and task force proceedings
• The expectation is that councilmembers will not typically attend board, commission, committee, working
group or task force meetings. However, under special circumstances, if we attend a meeting:
o We will do so only as an observer and prior to attending will notify the appropriate staff liaison
o Strive for good communication by reporting out to other councilmembers
WORKING WITH THE COMMUNITY
Residents: City staff is the first call for help for residents. We will refer residents who have concerns to the city
manager. If a resident has contacted the city manager but is still not satisfied, we will discuss with the city
manager. We acknowledge if a resident receives conflicting information from different councilmembers or staff
that is difficult for the resident and could increase liability for the city.
Businesses or other interests: The purpose of a city council meeting is to discuss information needed to make an
informed decision, review that information, and decide. It is not feasible to conduct all business in a public
meeting. Particularly around development, business interests might ask a member to meet outside of the city
council meeting to facilitate idea generation about proposals.
The city council's overarching principles for working the community are:
• Never grant any special consideration, treatment, or advantage
• Respect sensitivity of personal information
• Honor our rules regarding public testimony and clearly communicate the rules
• Make ourselves available to all parties on an equal basis and not advocate for a certain point of view
• Be cautious about how we participate in meetings or events and not prejudge the issue before the council has
had a chance to deliberate
CITY STAFF AND THE PUBLIC
Public decision -making must be fair and impartial and shall not be discriminatory on the basis of those protected
classes outlined in federal, state, and city laws and ordinances. City policy dictates that elected officials and
advisory board members conduct business in a manner which, both internally and in relation to each other and
their constituencies, is free from illegal discrimination based on race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex,
disability, age, marital status, socio-economic status, or sexual orientation.
Meetings requested by residents or businesses:
1. AFTER DECISION: If we are invited to a meeting about an issue the council has decided upon, we will explain
how the council arrived at the decision.
2. DURING DECISION: If we are invited to a meeting about an issue that will be before the council in the future,
we will uphold the above principles for working with the community, and:
a. We will not make our decision about an issue before the city council until the process allows.
b. We will be sensitive to the fact that we are not hearing everyone, and we will give equal consideration to
all feedback regardless of the way it is received.
3. DURING SPECIFIED ENGAGEMENT PROCESS: If we meet with a resident during a planned engagement
process, we will notify the resident that we are there to listen and encourage them to participate through the
established process to engage. We will ensure that staff received the feedback provided to us.
4. OTHER ENGAGEMENT OPPORTUNITIES: Engagement opportunities outside of formal council meetings are
often an effective and meaningful way to connect with residents in a less formal manner, such as meeting
with one or two residents about a topic, meeting with a few business owners in an area, or holding a listening
session for a small portion of a neighborhood. The goal of these smaller engagement opportunities is to
provide one or two councilmembers the opportunity to engage with constituents in a smaller group setting,
different than larger, staff -supported events such as an open house or broader neighborhood meeting, that
may be subject to the open meeting law. These opportunities should be considered as listening sessions for
feedback on a topic that the councilmember(s) then relay to the full council as part of formal consideration.
Should a councilmember like to host an engagement opportunity, they should:
• Inform the city manager to allow staff time if needed to notify about the opportunity, ensuring equal
access for all and ensuring that all regulatory and open meeting law requirements are met.
• Inform their fellow councilmembers that an engagement opportunity will be taking place.
Councilmembers should use these opportunities to:
• Listen to constituents' concerns and ideas.
• Encourage residents to attend council meetings and participate in the public decision -making process.
• Collaborate with the city manager to ensure that constituents' concerns and ideas are addressed through
staff and in accordance with established policies and procedures.
Councilmembers should avoid:
• Making promises or commitments on behalf of the council or city.
• Discussing confidential, private, or non-public sensitive information and redirect conversations to the
appropriate public forum(s).
• Directing staff or making specific requests outside of the established protocol (i.e., via the city manager).
• Councilmembers should keep a separation between their official duties and any campaign/re-election
N.
activities.
5. We will also notify the city manager in the event we wish to attend board/commission meetings as well as
legislative committee meetings/hearings so staff can notify the chair(s) and/or lobbyists in order to be best
prepared.
By following these guidelines, councilmembers can effectively engage with the public outside of formal
council meetings while maintaining transparency, upholding ethical responsibilities and encouraging active
participation in the local government decision -making process.
COUNCIL CONDUCT WITH CITY STAFF
Direction to Staff for Projects/Agenda Items - Direction is given to city staff to pursue items that generally impact
the public policy of the city by reaching consensus during a workshop or through a direct binding majority vote of
the council at a special or regular business meeting. This direction can occur either through a workshop item
agenda form with general consensus of the council or under other business on the regular business agenda
through a motion/second and majority vote. Once direction is given, the city manager will assign the work to a
staff member or advise the council that additional staffing will be needed to carry out the task. City staff,
including the direct employees of the council (the city manager and city attorney), are not obligated to pursue
items for only one councilmember. If a councilmember wishes to direct staff to work on a specific item, the
councilmember must receive consent of the council by reaching consensus during a workshop meeting, by a
majority vote of approval, or by submitting a workshop item agenda form that results in consensus of the council.
Requests for Information on Non -Agenda Items - City staff carry out the day-to-day business of operating the city.
The council should keep this in mind when requesting information or asking to perform these functions.
Generally, all interactions with staff members should flow through the city manager. If a councilmember is asking
for information from city staff that will require more than 30 minutes of staff time to collect or research a
problem and prepare a response, the request will need to be approved by the council to ensure that staff
resources are allocated in accordance with overall council priorities.
Interaction with Staff - It is not appropriate for councilmembers to admonish city staff when disagreeing with the
information brought forth for presentation to the governing body. Concerns should be taken up with the city
manager, and if an issue is identified that needs to be addressed by the whole council, it will be brought forth
accordingly. In any event, there shall be no personal attacks on city staff.
COUNCIL CONDUCT WITH THE PUBLIC
Public Meetings - Making the public feel welcome is an important part of the democratic process. Recognizing
that the actions of each council member impact the public perception of the whole council, councilmembers shall
strive to treat the public with respect.
Connecting Residents with Staff Resources - Councilmembers serve as the link between residents and their local
government. Through various channels such as mail, telephone, face-to-face interactions, and electronic means,
council facilitates a crucial two-way exchange of information.
On one hand, councilmembers are often the first point of contact for residents who wish to express concerns,
seek assistance or provide recommendations for policy; therefore, it is essential that councilmembers handle
these interactions with tact and professionalism to maintain positive relationships and foster citizen support for
the government. On the other hand, councilmembers also play a key role in disseminating information about city
programs and policies to the public. By educating residents about local government and the rationale behind city
policies, councilmembers can help build understanding and support for city initiatives.
In day-to-day community interactions, councilmembers need not act as intermediaries between city staff and
community members when advocating for a community issue brought directly to the councilmember.
Councilmembers should connect community members to the appropriate city resources when contacted about
various issues by reaching out to the city manager and appropriate department heads and requesting follow-up
as needed. The city manager and appropriate department heads shall address the issue or delegate it to the
appropriate staff for follow-up. Further follow-up with the councilmember by the city manager and appropriate
department heads for informational purposes may occur if necessary.
Councilmembers' Behavior and Conduct: Councilmembers who violates the code of conduct are subject to
admonition, reprimand, or censure. Any violations that potentially constitute criminal conduct shall be handled
by the criminal justice system.
Accountability/Consequences: A potential action for failing to comply with this code of conduct may include the
following:
1. Admonition. An admonition shall be verbal or written statement made by the mayor to the councilmember.
2. Reprimand. A reprimand shall be administered to the councilmember by letter. The letter shall be approved by
the city council and shall be signed by the mayor, or by the mayor pro tem if the mayor position is vacant or if the
matter involves the mayor.
3. Censure. A censure shall be administered pursuant to a formal resolution adopted by the council. A member
may receive a public admonishment for failure to conform with any provisions of these bylaws, state statute,
violation of confidentiality or attorney -client privilege, or other acts considered to merit reprimand by the city
council. Such censure may include other actions or punishments by city council in conformity of the law. The city
council, as a body, may by motion and a supermajority, commend or censure one of its own. If the act involves
two members of the council, a majority vote is required.
Factors that will be considered in determining the appropriate consequence include but are not limited to the
seriousness of the violation and/or the number of preceding violations.
Procedures for reporting:
1. A member of the city council may report a potential code of conduct violation by a member of the council by
bringing the matter to the attention of the mayor, city manager, or city attorney.
2. A city staff member may report a potential code of conduct violation by a member of the council by bringing
the matter to the attention of the city manager or human resources manager.
3. If the potential violation involves the mayor, it should be brought to the attention of the mayor pro tem, city
manager or city attorney.
4. If the mayor and/or mayor pro tem are unable to be involved in reviewing the code of conduct complaint for
any reason, the matter will be reviewed by the next most senior member of the council not involved in the
complaint.
5. Upon receipt of a complaint, the following diagram highlights the process that will be used:
Reporting and Addressing Possible Code of Conduct Violations
How to report Triage Fact -Finding Possible
Consequences
INTERNAL COUNCIL CONDUCT
The council exists to work in the interest of the public. The council should strive to work as a team in achieving
the best outcome for the community. The council should conduct business in a civil, efficient, and cooperative
manner with other members of the council and city staff. It is incumbent upon the members of council to listen
to one another and give full opportunity for all viewpoints to be heard. All disagreements should be handled in a
civil fashion.
Inappropriate behavior by a councilmember such as intentionally or with malice sharing false statements during a
council meeting may be addressed through a verbal correction by the mayor/mayor pro tem either during or
outside of the council meeting. Further incidents may be addressed by subsequent verbal corrections
accompanied by use of the gavel. Repeated incidents can give rise to the mayor/mayor pro tem not recognizing
the offending councilmember to speak. A councilmember can request that any of these actions against an
offending councilmember be taken if the mayor/mayor pro tem has not done so on their own.
Councilmembers must act in a respectful, courteous and professional manner while acting in their roles as
elected officials. Councilmembers are entitled to disagree regarding city direction and decisions relating to
regulations, policies and positions, but councilmembers may not use their titles as mayor/councilmember or any
city -sponsored means of communication (e.g.: city -issued email, social media posts, etc.) to disparage other
members, council decisions, city staff or any city -related issues. Personal attacks against staff, other
councilmembers, or members of the public by a councilmember without basis is a violation of the Rules of Order
and Procedure and the Council Code of Conduct.
Councilmembers acknowledge they are elected to be one member of a decision -making body and at times
members may disagree with the approved decisions of a majority of the council. While councilmembers may
respectfully disagree with decisions made by the majority, members should not publicly disparage or undermine
approved council decisions in any manner that may be detrimental to the city carrying out such decisions and
acting as directed by a majority of the council.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS
Members shall represent positions approved by the council to the best of their ability when working with:
• Legislative bodies
• Federal or state agencies
• Other local governments, such as school boards, counties, or municipalities
If an individual councilmember's opinion differs from the city position, or a matter agreed upon by the full
council, members shall explicitly state they do not represent their city councilor the City of Blaine, nor will they
allow the inference that they do.
Members will represent the official policies or positions of the city as set forth in the city charter, city
ordinances, and the motions and resolutions adopted by a majority of the city council to the best of their
abilities. When presenting their individual opinions and positions that differ from the official policies or
positions of the city, members must explicitly state they are speaking in their personal capacity and do not
represent the position of the city or the council.
1(
Blaine City Council Code of Conduct
Acknowledgement
✓ I acknowledge that I have received a copy of the Blaine City Council Code of
Conduct.
✓ I understand that I am responsible for familiarizing myself and complying
with the Code.
✓ I understand that if I need clarification of the contents within the Code, I will
contact the City Manager or City Attorney.
Name
(print)
Signature
Date
AGENDA ITEMS - 3E I and 3E2
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 22, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Jessica Jagoe, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Use of City Property and Immigration Enforcement Discussion
Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source:
N/A N/A N/A
Council Should Consider
Council should discuss topic areas below and provide direction to Staff on next steps.
Background
At the February 9th Work Session, the City Council requested a recurring work session agenda
item to allow for discussion on topics related to immigration enforcement. Below are topics that
Council requested be brought back for discussion by the City Council related to immigration
enforcement. Council is asked to discuss these topics and provide direction to Staff on next steps
and/or removal of any particular topic(s) from the list and/or other topics that should be brought
forward under this agenda item for future discussion.
Use of City Property Policy/Ordinance (i.e., staging area)
At the May 1 lth Work Session, the City Council directed staff to bring back information on
amending the city code to regulate the use of city -owned parking lots (i.e., staging areas). Staff
worked with the City Attorney to prepare draft language that would address this concern. Below
is the proposed language for the City Council to discuss and provide feedback on. Following
Council discussion and direction, city staff would bring draft language forward to a future
regular meeting for adoption.
Section 397 — City -owned parking lots
39 7. 001 Permit required.
Page 1 of 2
No event or activity is allowed in a parking lot owned by the city that will impede the normal course
ofpublic activity in the parking lot without an approved permit. The application for the permit shall
be submitted at least fourteen (14) days prior to the event or activity on a form provided by the
City. No permit fee shall be required. The permit is subject to review and administrative approval
by the City Administrator or designee. The permit may be denied or revoked if it conflicts with or
significantly impedes the normal course of activity and public purpose of the public parking lot.
397.002 Enforcement.
The city administrator or designee shall enforce this section. In addition to any other remedy
available at equity or at law, failure to comply with this section may result in restrictions or
penalties as provided in chapter 1 of this code.
Other topics for further discussion
SharinkofData and Access to City Buildingsy
o Based on City Council direction at the March 9th and May 1 lth Work Sessions,
staff will be preparing a policy that will be brought forward to a future work
session for consideration.
Budget Impact
IBM
Attachment
Attachment A: Draft City Code Amendment Section 397
Page 2 of 2
Attachment A
City of Arden Hills
Draft Ordinance Amendment
Section 397 — City -owned parking lots
397.001 Permit required.
No event or activity is allowed in a parking lot owned by the city that will impede the normal
course of public activity in the parking lot without an approved permit. The application for
the permit shall be submitted at least fourteen (14) days prior to the event or activity on a
form provided by the City. No permit fee shall be required. The permit is subject to review
and administrative approval by the City Administrator or designee. The permit may be denied
or revoked if it conflicts with or significantly impedes the normal course of activity and public
purpose of the public parking lot.
397.002 Enforcement.
The city administrator or designee shall enforce this section. In addition to any other remedy
available at equity or at law, failure to comply with this section may result in restrictions or
penalties as provided in chapter 1 of this code.
AGENDA ITEM - 3F
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 22, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Jessica Jagoe, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Rice Creek Commons/TCAAP Discussion
Budgeted Amount:
N/A
For Council Consideration
Actual Amount:
N/A
Funding Source:
N/A
Council will have the opportunity to comment on any TCAAP related items they so choose.
Background
N/A
Budget Impact
N/A
Attachment
N/A
Page 1 of 1
AGENDA ITEM - 3G
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 22, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Jessica Jagoe, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Agenda Planning
Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source:
N/A N/A N/A
Council Should Consider
Council should discuss its next Work Session agenda.
Background
Per Council's adopted policy on agenda setting, please find the proposed agenda below for the
upcoming meeting.
July 13th Work Session
• 2027-2031 CIP Discussion
• Zoning Code Updates
• Immigration Discussion
• Agenda Planning (time sensitive)
• RCC/TCAAP Discussion
July 27th Work Session
• Great River Greening
• 2027 CIP and Operating Budget Discussion
• Zoning Code Updates
• Immigration Discussion
• Agenda Planning (time sensitive)
• RCC/TCAAP Discussion
Attachment A is the list of topics that have yet to be discussed by Council and the ranking of
priority topics. Staff will begin to work on the higher priority items into upcoming Work
Page 1 of 2
Sessions sooner while putting the lower priority items to later discussions. Please note, this does
not reflect all items at Work Sessions as Staff will have necessary items for discussion, such as,
budget discussions, concept plan reviews, or Public Works projects that need timely direction.
Council may want to discuss whether any items need to be added to this list for future discussion
or assign a future meeting for some of these items. This would need to be done by a majority
consensus of Council.
Below is a running list of things Staff brings forward to Work Session annually, in recent years,
we have shifted away from bringing some items forward unless needed, such as, the Pavement
Management Update from Public Works. Note, these timelines may shift year to year. Most
items discussed at Work Sessions are one-off items that may require multiple meetings but are
usually not recurring.
• January
o Legislative priorities
• February
o None
• March
o Initial guidance on current year Public Works projects
• April
o None
• May
o None
• June
o None
• July
o Capital improvement planning
• August
o Operating budgets
• September
o Operating budget and levy discussion
o Committee/Commission Work Plans
• October
o None
• November
o City-wide budget and fee schedule
o Follow up on next year's Public Works projects
• December
o Committee and commission appointments
Budget Impact
N/A
Attachment
Attachment A: Council Priorities
Attachment B: Agenda Setting Policy
Page 2 of 2
Attachment A
Topic for Consideration
Short-term Rental Ordinance
Likely Responsible Department
CD/Admin
Total
15
Werge
3.00
Majority Next Steps
Council WS
Rental Licensing Program
CD/Admin
15
3.00
Council WS
Funding for Lake Johanna Boulevard Trail
PW/Fin
9
1.80
Council WS
Climate Action Plan
Admin
9
1.80
Council WS
Code of Conduct
Admin
81
1.60
Council WS
Encroachment Discussion (2025)/Adopt A Spot
PW
8
1.60
Staff Recommendation
Cannabis Discussion
CD/Admin
8
1.60
Council WS
Energy Audit
Admin
7
1.40
Staff Recommendation
Temporary Goats/Buckthorn
Admin
71
1.40
Staff Recommendation
Buy Nothing Day/Clean Up Day
Admin
6
1.20
Staff Recommendation
Community Survey
Admin
6
1.20
Council WS
Committee/Commission Liaison Role Policy
Admin
5
1.00
Council WS
EV Fleet Analysis
pW
5
1.00
Staff Recommendation
Added Items:
Data Center Moratorium
Lake Johanna Cold Plunge
Sponsorship Policy
E-Bike Regulations
On -Street Parking/MVHS
Tree Removal Enforcement
Attachment B
It
"ENILLS
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
Agenda Setting Policy
The purpose of this policy is to establish a method for agenda setting that allows for Council to
review and have control over its agendas and decide as a Council how it wants items for
consideration to be brought forward.
For regular worksession agendas:
• Prior to concluding each regularly scheduled worksession, the City Council shall review
its next regularly scheduled worksession agenda and direct Staff on any changes.
• Should an individual Councilmember want to raise an item for discussion at the next
meeting or in the future, they would do so during this review period. The item would
need at least one other Councilmember to agree to having the item considered for future
discussion, and then Council, by majority, would direct to have it placed on a future
agenda or not.
Staff will have flexibility to add or remove items to the worksession as needed to
maintain operational efficacy.
For regular City Council meeting agendas:
• Agendas will be largely Staff driven based on approvals needed for normal operations.
• Items coming from the City Council shall first be discussed at a worksession and can
direct Staff at said worksession to bring items forward for formal approval if needed.
• In rare instances, if a Councilmember brings forward an item that needs approval prior to
going to a worksession, they may request the City Administrator add the item to the
agenda. The City Administrator shall have the discretion to determine if the issue should
be added or not, but Councilmembers will make every effort to having the item first
discussed at a worksession.
Special meetings and emergency meetings:
• Special meetings and emergency meetings may still be called at the discretion of the
Mayor or any two Councilmembers, and the members calling the meeting shall set the
agenda.