HomeMy WebLinkAboutCCP 09-20-1999
.1
.
'At
."
FilE
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
4364 WEST ROUND LAKE ROAD
ARDEN HILLS, MN 55112-5794
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION
CITY HALL
MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 20, 1999,4:45 P.M.
4:45 P:M.
4:45 P.M.
7:15 P.M.
7:30 P.M.
_.~
1.
Call to Order
2.
Miscellaneous Items
3.
Discussion Items
a. North Suburban Cable Commission Update, Dave Sand
b. Old Highway 10 Water Main Extension Petition Discussion
c. Pavement Management Plan (pMP)I2000 Project Scope
d. Comprehensive Plan Update, Status Report
e. City Administrator Hiring Process, Identify Interview
Candidates and Schedule Dates for Interviews
4.
Adjourn
The above times may vary depending upon length of issue discussion.
PHONE: 1651)633-5676 . FAX (651)633-7839
Tentative SentemOOr Meetin!! Schedule
Meeting dates, times and locations are subject to change.
Please contact City Hail for the most current schedule.
September I Communications 6:00 P.M.
Committees
September I Planning Commission 7:30 P.M.
September 13 Council Meeting 7:30 P.M.
September 16 Operations & Finance 7:00 P.M.
Committee
September 20 Council Worksession 4:45 P.M.
September 23 Water Quality 7:00 P.M.
Task Force
September 27 Economic Development 7:00 P.M.
Authority
September 27 Council Meeting 7:30 P.M.
September 28 Parks & Recreation 7:00 P.M.
Committee
September 29 1-35W Corridor 5:30 P.M.
Coalition Board Meeting
September 29 Communications 6:00 P.M.
Committee
September 30 V olunteerlStaff 5:30 P.M.
Appreciation Event
Tentative October Meetin!! Sehedule
Meeting dates, times and locations are subject to chang~.
Please contact City Hall for the most current schedule.
October 6
Planning Commission
7:30 P.M.
October 6
1-35W Conidor 7:00 P.M.
Coalition (Joint Meeting
with Metropolitan Council)
October 12" Council Meeting 7:30 P.M.
'(Tuesday)
October 18 Council Worksesslon 4:45 P.M.
October 21 Operations & Finance 7:00 P.M.
Committee
October 25 Economic Development 7:00 P.M.
Authority
October 25 Council Meeting 7:30 P.M.
October 26 Parks & Recreation 7:00 P.M.
Committee
October 27 Communications 6:00 P.M. .!
Committee
..
~~_._------="-'-~
~~.Q~
112[!f 4 1 LU~:"A
.
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
4364 WEST ROUND LAKE ROAD
ARDEN HILLS, MN 55112-5794
September 17,1999
.
Mr. Dan Vaughan
Arden Towers, Inc.
3440 Bayside Road
Orono, MN 55356
Dear Mr. Vaughan,
After careful review of the Ehresmann Engineering, Inc. (EEl) report, dated November 5,
1998, the City of Arden Hills (City) still has serious concerns as to the safety ofthe tower
for the following reasons:
.
1. The report from EEl, dated November 5,1998, appears to have
been completed for the installation of an additional antenna at the 300-foot
level. No permits or amendments to the Special Use Permit have been issued
for this antenna.
2. Two engineering reports, completed last year on the Arden Tower by EEl, have
used different loading factors. Specifically:
a.) The November 5,1998, report does not have ten antennas that were on a
previous report dated February 2, 1998, including the recently installed U.S.
West antennas currently known to be on the tower.
b.) The November 5, 1998, report included two antennas that were not on the
February 2, 1998, report but are listed as existing. Included are highlighted
sections from both engineering reports for your review (attachments H and
I).
c.) Neither report contains calculations including Yz" radial ice as part of their
design.
3. The State Building Code (Code) requirement for including Yz" radial ice in
tower designs went into effect September 9, 1980. The Arden Tower was built
approximately 1 year later.
.
4. The report prepared for the U.S. West antennas installation by Paul J. Ford &
Co., dated July 16, 1998, states "that when Yz" radial ice accumulation is
PHONE: (651) 633.5676 . FAX (651) 633.7839
considered, the Tower has the capacity to safely withstand only 25 mph winds, .
In 680 feet out of the 700-foot Tower, the Tower legs are overstressed to some
extent. This is due to the fact that the Tower has a very severely bent shape in
the wind. Most of the guy cables and all of the existing foundations are
overstressed when ice accumulation is considered."
That same report goes on to state that the base foundation and inner anchor are
inadequate to support the Tower loading. Also, that the existing middle and
outer anchor guy rods are insufficient to support the new reactions when Yz"
radial ice is considered.
5. The minutes of the regular Planning Commission meeting of March 4, 1981,
reflect Jim Cahill, engineer for Motorola, stating the 700-foot Tower will
withstand 125 mph winds, will hold fifteen antennae and will have 3 sets of
anchors. He also noted that a 2.0 safety factor would be built into the tower.
6. According to the Special Use Permit (pC#81-05), the project was to be
constructed and operated in strict accordance with the documentation on file.
That documentation included the Unarco-Rohn drawing of February 12, 1981,
the Unarco-Rohn "Description of Computer Analysis for Guyed Tower by
Moment Distribution" of February 13, 1981, and the Athens Construction, Inc.,
site plan of February 11, 1981.
.
The Unarco-Rohn drawing of February 12, 1981, includes a table showing the
original Tower design loading. This table shows 5 UHF's with 3-6" S.A. at the
top and again at the 660-foot elevation and the 620-foot elevation, No other
antennas are shown.
The Unarco-Rohn computer analysis also indicates all antennae located above
the 600 foot level.
From the engineering reports that were done by EEl in 1998, it appears that no
less than 18 additional antennae are now located on the Tower.
City code requires any additions or alterations to the tower require an
amendment to the Special Use Permit and a Building Permit. A check of City
files shows only one permit issued for the property at 1777 14th Street since the
original installation. That permit was for electrical work regarding U.S. West
antennae installation in 1998.
7. According to the Unarco-Rohn documents on file, the Tower was not designed
to withstand Yz" of radial ice, as required by the Code at that time, but was a
consideration in their computer analysis.
.
.
Code at the time of the original installation required W' radial ice and 65 PSF
wind load. Current code still requires 12" radial ice and an 80-mph baseline
wind speed. I have enclosed a copy of the 1980 State Building Code
(Attachment M) which required 12" radial ice and also a letter from the State
Building Code to an engineer regarding the issue of 12" radial ice for your
convenience.
Issue
Due to the reasons listed above, the City has serious concerns regarding the safety of the
Tower.
Statutory Authoritv
Chapter 34, Section 3403.2 of the Code states that no additions or alteration shall be made
to an existing structure that will cause the structure to be in violation of any of the
provisions of this Code and such additions or alterations shall not cause the existing
structure to become unsafe, An unsafe condition shall be deemed to have been created if
an addition or alteration will cause the existing structure to become structurally unsafe or
overloaded.
Section 104.2.9 of the Code allows the City to request tests as proof of compliance with
the codes, at no cost to the jurisdiction.
.
Requested Action
The City is requesting an engineering report from an independent, unbiased, State of
Minnesota licensed engineer, experienced in Tower design, to address all of the above
listed items. The report shall also include all information relating to the current condition
of the Tower and its safety. The report shall be completed and in our office no later
than November 15, 1999.
If you should have any questions or concerns, please call me at 651/633-5676.
Sincerely,
Dave Scherbel
Building Official
DS/seh
Attachments (3)
cc: Jerry Filla, City Attorney
Terrance Post, Interim City Administrator
.
INC
e1~. It.........
..- ~,al\JI /4 &..
...~..~.....-:-.....g....;..
I ..""'...Q...._~;.:..,.~..
.,' ~l,'
. I .'Z. f (~ ~~"\1'\ ~
.. ........,6..'1,- .
~ '!!\..',(~- i""":
... ~....)~ 'J.,{,.s ,:
."". ...,'"j.._.....~~~...
...." EnQlntf;l" ....
..............
RR$ BoxJ80B . ~ W JlllS"CCI..Y.nkl~n. Sou,h 0.1<,;,. $'078
phone: (60~}66~.j~~1. FAX: (60~)M:\.YiXlJ
February 02,1998
. Mr. Dan Vaughan
Arden Towers, Inc.
. 3440 Bayside Road
Orono, MNS5356
Ph: 612-525-7855
Fax: ~lZ-473-3880
Subject: 700' Rohn80 Guyed Tower
Site: Arden, MN
EEl JO: 2736
Dear Mr. Vaughan,
.
We have completed our revised structuraJ stress analysis' of
the above described tower per your request. All information
required to complete our structural analysis was furnished
to EEl by your office.
Antenna loading was included per fax from your office dated
01/22/98 and per fax from Julie Townsend with US West Wire-
less dated 12/17/97.
Our analysis was completed per TIA/ElA-222-F, 80mph wind
velocity and.~ce ~il;J,ifo~~ngJll~os1in~~as q~1i,/~{.:J. /'t!Y'
Existina Is: Proposed Loadina s-fi/fi.'e.'1t!... IU(J.~ 7' . . .
ITEM ELEVATION REMARK
------------------------------------------------------------
.
Beacon & Strobe
PD458 on 6' SA
PDll10 on 6' SA
Preamp
7' Stabilizer
PD1l32 on 6' SA
PD1ll0 on 6' SA
7' Stabilizer
PD458 on 6' SA
PDll10 on 6' 'SA
PD458 on 6' SA
t'Jl'1:1'O 01) 6' SA A.f... n/S'
1'D458 on 6' SA
TD6074 on 6' SA
Side Lights
TDE6073 on 6' SA
Strobe Lights
Side Lights
. DB-Z22E on Side Mount
700'
700'
700'
698'
680'
660"
655'
600'
570'
570'
555'
555'
540'
540'
535'
520'
470'
415'
400'
EXisting
Existing
EXisting
Existing
Existing
Existing
Existin!j"
Existing
Existing
Existing
Existing
Existing
Existing
EXisting
Existing
Existing
. Existing
Existing
Existing
TOlrER DES/GS' l'ot'SD.mOS DES/GS ' sTRt:cnlAAL AVAL\'S/S .lXSPECT/ON . COlrMUX/CATlDX TOIIUS
PROJECT .IL-l.\'.~GE.I/E.\T . SFEC/I'/C.moxs ' DETAIL/XC' fE. CEErrll'/C.-l.TlO.V. STEEL FABRIC.mo.v
j., (t
. .
c:r (G1
H 7,/ f,
\
.
... .",
Existinq ~ Prooosed Loadinq = continued
ITEM
ELEVATION
REMARK
------------------------------------------------------------
DB-222E on Side Mount 400'
DB-222.E on Side Mount 4'..'WIr."'t" 387 '
DB-SS6 on 6'SA ~,-t" '" "Ii'" 300'
Scala OGP9-93K on 6' SA 30D'
DB-SS9 on 6' SA 300'
Beacon 280'
I)BS~!ii.l;!n . 6.' SA "',,,, 01t~/~ 2S0 '.
'€'"Wlll" . on 6' SA "~ 250'
. ltf'tlJ3'r92 Yagis ::: .:" J}'f 250'
Strobe Lights 240'
ASP952 on 6' SA 200'
DB sO 6":Yon 6' SA ".1''''' 11/1' . 200'
. Side Lights 140'
DB230...;E 130 '
(;i) SP9014-DIN onT-Frame ,..r ." 70 '
. g.~ ~~~gij=g~~ 6~ i:~;:=: ,,/t' .."ttt :g:
Existing
EXisting
Existing
Existing.
Existing
Existing
Existing
Existing
Existing
Existing
Existing
. Existing
Existing
'. Existing
proposed'
Proposed
Proposed
.
Results. Dot ion 1 = Existinq Tower. Existinq ! Proposed
Antennas. SO MPH wind and .D.Q ice.
Analvsisper TIA/EIA-222-F.
Mast:
Leqs: The maximum combined stress ratio in the
vertical members is 1.29 at elevation 120'
which is less than the maximum allowable
value of 1.33. See comments.
Diaq: The maximum combined stress ratios in the
bracing members is 0.94 at elevation 440'
which is less than the maximum allowable
value of 1.33. See comments.
Guvs:
The minimum ,guy $afety factor is 2.25 at
elevation 300' which is greater than the
minimum required value of 2.00. See
ments.
com-
.
~,IJ
Founda:::n~o the lack of information regarding the {t~
existing fou.ndations. for the anchors and t. o. wer I.
base, we cannot comment on their capacity at .
this time. Furthersubgrade inspection is .
required to determine their capacity .:It,is/ .
the tower. owners option andresponsibifn:~ .to ."
complete this subgrade inspection.
2
.," ~
,'" ~
., ...........
. ' 'II- ~
....,.. . "."'/. _ . ....~.,~~~~e';;....
, Ii' EI EHRESMAJVN ENGINEERING,. INC ".,,__ (~~~Y)
......,. RR5 Box 38OB. yankton, South Dakota 57078 ....\~;o 1..$/
Phone: (60S) 665-7532 . FAX: (605) 665-9780 ....::4"E/igin..i'..>..
..............
Nov~ber 05, 1998
Mr. Dan Vaughan
Arden Towers, Inc.
3440 Bayside Road
Orono, MN 55356
Ph: 612-473-3660
~ Fax: 612-473-3880
Subject: 700' Rohn 80 Guyed Tower
Site: Arden, MN
EEl JO: 2736 (Revision 6)
Dear Mr. Vaughan,
We have completed our revised structural stress analysis of
the above described tower per your request. All information
required to complete our structural analysis was furnished
to EEl by your office.
.
Antenna loading was included per faxes from your office
dated 09/21/98 and 10/27/98.
Per fax from your office dated 10/12/98, we considered all
feedlines to be bundled and evenly distributed on each of
the (3) tower faces when completing our analysis.
Please note, the feedline for the proposed antenna is to be
bundled to existing feedline bundle as shown on attached
feedline drawing 27365A1.
Our analysis was completed per TIA/EIA-222-F, 80 mph wind
velocity and no ice per your instructions as outlined in fax
from your office dated 10/28/98 while supporting existing
and proposed loading as follows:
Existinq and Proposed Loadinq
ITEM
ELEVATION
REMARK
--------------------~---------------------------------------
.
Beacon & Strobe
PD458 on 6' SA
PD1110 on 6' SA
Preamp
7' Stabilizer
PD1132 on 6' SA
PDll10 on 6' SA
7' Stabilizer
PD458 on 6' SA
700'
700'
700'
698'
680'
660'
655'
600'
570'
Existing
Existing
Existing
Existing
Existing
Existing
Existing
Existing
Existing
TOWER DESIGN . FOUND~TION DESlGtv . STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS. INSPECTION
PR(lJECT JfANAGEMENT. SPECIFICATIONS. DETAIliNG. RE. CERTIFICATION
,.,.
.
.
.
... .....
Existinq Loadinq = continued
ITEM
ELEVATION
------------------------------------------------------------
REMARK
PD1110 on 6' SA
PD458 on 6' SA
PD458 on 6' SA
TD6074 on 6' SA
Side Lights
TDE6073 on 6' SA
Strobe Lights
Side Lights
DB-222E on Side Mount
DB-224E on Side Mount
Scala OGP9-93K on 6' SA
DB-589 on 6' SA
** Scala OGP9~900 on 6' SA
Beacon
TDC.6060A ,o~ 6' SA IA.' ..../A
00809 on 6 SA II.t,.. a/a
Strobe Lights
ASP952 on 6' SA
Side Lights
DB230-E
570'
555'
540'
540'
535'
520'
470'
415'
400'
387'
300'
300'
300'
280'
250'
250'
240'
200'
140'
130'
** Indicates Proposed Loading
~
~/"
Existing
EXisting
Existing
Existing
Existing
Existing
Existing
Existing
Existing
Existing
Existing
Existing
Proposed
Existing
Existing
Existing
Existing
Existing
Existing
Existing
Results. Option 1 = Existinq Tower with Existinq gng
Proposed Antennas. 80 MfH ~ and DQ
ice. Analvsis per TIA/EIA-222-F.
Mast:
Leqs: The maximum combined stress rat'io in the
vertical members is 1.25 at elevation 180'
which is less than the maximum allowable
value of 1.33. See comments.
Diaq: The maximum combined stress ratios in the
bracing members is 0.99 at elevation 600'
which is less than the maximum allowable
value of 1.33. See comments.
Guvs: The minimum guy safety factor is 2.40 at
elevation 520' which is greater than the
minimum required value of 2.00. See com-
ments.
2
"
.
.
.
MN BL~, CODES ~ STDS Fax:651-297-1973
.,""~~~
r':"""-"""
:t" ':l;~..
'.,,//
. . .~.
:"
'j
I, '
./
( l::
.......,
I
Sep 13 'gy 8:28
P.02/06
.ex~. "
'If
MINNESOTA CODE OF AGENCY RULES
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
BUILDING CODE DIVISION ., ,
MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE.
---
Ef9 "en" l; :
A:;, ::Gf'T"
Cite the Rule lIS:
(for example)
2 MCAR ~ 1.1 020 1
i,
Published and Distributed By
STATE REGISTER AND PUBLIC DOCUMENTS DIVISION
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
117 University Avenue
St. Paul, Minnesota S5155
\,
.--.--
.
.
.
P.U,5:l
,...., t
~{f
I
I
1
!
1
,
1
I
I
I
I
,
,
1
MN BLDG CODES & STDS
Fax:651-297-1973
Sep U '':1':1
~:L':I
2 MCAR Ii 1.10111
Department of AdminiltntiOD
EXCEPTION, Unless otherwise required by the building official, buildingo
or portions thereof, other than earth sheltered structures. which are con"
stru,-ted in accordance with the conventional framing rcquircme.nts specified
in Chapter,2S of this code shall be deemed to meet the requirements of this
section.
Ii BOS(d) of the UBC i. amended to read as fallows:
UBC Ii 230S(d) Snow Loads, Snow loads full or unbalancecl shall be Con-
.idcred in place of load. set forth in Table No. 23<, where such loading will
result in larger members or connections.
A basic snow load of 4Cl pounds !ler square foot of horizontal projection is
required in the following counlies: Anoka, Carlton, Carver. Chisago, Cook,
nakota, Hennepin, I..nti, Lake, Pine, Ramsey, St. Louis, Scot! and Washing.
ton. A basic snow load of 30 pounds per square foot of horizontai projection
is required for all other counties.
Potential accumulation of snow at valleys. parapets, roof structures and off-
set. in roofs of uneven configuration shall be considered. Where snow loads
occur, the Snow loacls shoJI be dolermined by the building official in accor-
dance with Appendix "B". V...l.i.,.... cf .s...o..>l....4s.
EXCEPTIONS'
L The requirements of Appendix "B" shall not apply to Group R Division
3, Group R Division 4 and M Occupancies.
2. A basic snow load of 30 pounds per square foot of horizontal projec-
tion shall be acceptable for detached Group M, Division I Occupancies in all
cQuntjes.
Snow loads in excess of 20 pounds per square foot may be reduced for each
delltee of pitch over 20 degrees. See Appendix B, Section A.
.~
~ 2311W of the UBC is amended to read:
,. ~:E,~ ./."':.::" ;'.~,_.' ".
VBt: Ii 23114 Open, Fram~..Tower... .Radio-towers -and.othe...lo"'.r. ef
trussed construction shall be designed and constructed to withstand wind
pressures specified in this Sectlon, multiplied by the shape factors set forth
in Table No. 23-H. '
Wind pressu",s shan be applied to the total normal projected area of all the
elements of one fa.ce (excluding ladders, conduits, lights., elevators, etc.~
which shall be accounted for separately by uSing the indicated factor for
theSe individual members), "---
(.1._','''
The effect of, one-half iIIeh of radial Ice :sIMIl- be inclucled ill the design of
30
("
,
I
,
I
,
.
.
.
t".U4/Ub
tti't
1/(j
I
I
!
I
!
i
,
.
I
!
i
i
!
,
.1
,
!
i
!
I
I
MN SLDG cuu~~ ~ ~IV~
~aX:b~l-~~(-l~(~
::;ep l~ '~':J
ts:~':J
Department or Adminisltation 2 NCAR @ 1.10111
open frame towers incJudil1& all supporting g\lYs. This effeet ~iii\ incluele the
weicht of the ice &Del the increaseel pro{iJe of each such tower component so
c:oeteel.
~ 2312(0) of th. UBC Is omended to read as follows:
UBC !l 2312(8) General. For the purpose of the Code this State ,hall be
considered to be:: in Zone "0", No Damage Are.a. Every building or structure
and ev~ry portion thereof shall be designed and constructed to resist stresses
produced by lateral forl:ts as provid.ed in [his Section. Stresses shall becalcu-
lated as lhe effect of 8 force applied horuontally al each floor or roof level
above lhe base, The Force shall be assumed to come from any hori~ontal
direction.
Structural concepts other than set forth in this section may be approved by
the Building Official when evidence is submitted showing the equivalent
ductility and energy absorption are provided,
Where prescribed wind loaus produce higher stresses. such loads ,hall be used
in lieu of the loads resulting from earthquake forces.
.,."t",:: I'
~ 1403(c,f is amended to read as follows:
~...-
UBe !i 240.1(<) Concrete Masonry Units. Con<r~te masonry units oiia.Il be
tlt" iJ t,.juality at leusl equal to the n:;quirement." st:l forth in U,B.C. Standard
No. 24-4 L\f No. 24-5 when used [or bearing walls or piers or when in contact
'Iolfith ground or expo!'Oed to thi.:; wr.:athe.r; or equallo the tequirerlle:nts set forth
in U.B.C. Stand.ard No. 24-6 when used for.nonbearing purposes and no"tex-
posr:u to tpe weathl::r. Solid uniu suhject ,~~_the ar,;:tionof weatht:t or soil sli'ii'l
he Grade 41.. Conerote masonry units ~ be test~d as set forth inU.B.C.
Standard No, 24-7.
Concrete masonry units used for walls below grade or fOT other uses as deteT-
mined by the designer.A'Ul. not De- subject to the moisture oontrol provisions
of Table 24-4-A of UBC Standard 24-4.
g 24~ i;';';;'';nd~d by the addition of paragraph (n)"';; l''''''''..';
UBC ~ 24!-4(n) Alternate Design Method. The speeification for the De--
sign and Construction of Load-Bearing Concrete Masonry 8th Printing May.
1978, published by the National Concrete Masonry Assoeiation may bb used
as an alternate design method providing the following conditiuns are satisfied.
I. The permit appliean t must inform the building official, in writing, that
the masonry design i$ based on the requirements of this subsection prior to
grunting of a building permit.
2. An outline of te.ting and field inspection scheduies and design caloula-
tionssigned by the responsible design professional shall be submitted to the
building official prior to granting of a building permit.
31
,
'.
,
,
i
!
i
MN BLDG CODES & STDS Fax:651-297-1973
'-
st'A1& t)F""II~;rr.:r.SOT.a..
Department of
.dministration
4D8 !'-Ictrn SqllOU'l!! BuildinB
Scverllh:and Roblin: Sl"'~l
Sai.ru: Pa\ll. ~IlMC$Db S,sllll
PhDRr:: 611 296-14J9
FAX; 612::97~19'j13
61:2 J,97.51S3
(TDD.Minncsot.a Jlt'by Service)
&00 6.S1.3$:!9
(Cillll:L&4r Minnl!!&Ot:L TDD-
M,innoot:l. Rd,ll,Y Scrv~l
.
.
Sep 13 '99
8:29
P.05/06
}If
Ut:ILDl~C CODES" ;;T.~SD~ l~~
December 8, 1993
Mr. Roger Barton, P.E.
Andrew Corporation
2701 Mayhill Road
Denton, TX 76208
Dear Mr. Barton:
Subject:
Our response to your request of November 24, 1993 regarding
the design of tower stnlctures for wind and ice.
Rule part 1305.4800 of the Minnesota State Building Code amends Uniform
Building Code Section 2311, Wind Design. This amendment requires that
one-half inch of radial ice be included in the design of open frame towers. As
no reference is made either in this rule or in UBC 2303(f) to a load
combination reduction of ice and wind, it is assumed that both the ice and
wind be considered to act simultaneously at their design load conditions.
The second paragraph of 1305.4800 states that certain structures, such as the
communication towers you reference, be designed in accordance with approved
national standards. Ai'lSI Standard EIA/TIA 222-E will be referenced in
section 2303(b) of the 1994 UEC as a recognized guideline standard.
Section 2.3.16 of 222-E permits a design based on dead load plus 75% of the
wind load plus the ice load. However, the footnote states that when the basic
wind speed is specified as occurring simultaneously with an ice locui by the
purchaser or locai IZUthority, no reduction factor shall be applied to the wind load..
From our conversations with two local engineers experienced in tower
construction, it appears that Minnesota's climatic conditions generally would
not produce maximum simultaneous design wind and ice loadings. However,
as stated in appendix. H of 222-E, simultaneous application of maximum wind
and ice loadings may be required if in some geographical areas, seasonal high
winds and icing could OCCUI simultaneously. This implies that for each specific
installation, the design engineer is responsible to detennine if the maximum
simultaneous loads of wind and ice could occur in that geographic location.
.
.
.
IYIN J:lLUl.J LU.LJC.-=> C< '::>!LA:> idX.O:::H-4;1(-l'::lf")
;,ep 1" ""
;o:;..:>u
1". Ut>/Utl
Mr. Roger Barton, P.E.
Page 2
December 8, 1993
In summary, this division recognizes the use of ElA/TIA 222-E as an approved
nanonolstandard to use when designing towers in Minnesota provided an 80 MPH
baseline wind speed is used in conjunction with a minimum of Y.! " radial ice.
We hope this information is helpful.
Sincerely,
BUILDING CODES AND STANDARDS DIVISION
Jdl/) felL
Scott D. McLellan
Building Code Representative
sdmjsw
c;
Consultant Staff
,.
...
!I( (
.
.
.
.
~~
q( ?D11i
MedJaOne
Law & Public Policy Departmenl
10 River Plaza
St. Paul, Minnesota 55107
Telephone: 651.312.5280
Facsimile: 651.312.5288
MediaOne
David G. Seykora
Vice President - Law & Public Policy
ThiJ i..s Brnadba.nd. Thil. i.J th~ way.
HAND DELIVERED
September 1, 1999
Coralie A. Wilson
North Suburban Access Corporation
& North Suburban Cable Commission
950 Woodhill Drive
Roseville, MN 55113
Dear Ms, Wilson:
I am writing this letter in follow-up to our meeting with you and Mr.
Creighton on August 26, 1999 at which time we discussed the status of our call
center action plan, We discussed the data you would like to see demonstrating
the progress we are making in implementing our action plan.
With this letter, we are enclosing the supplemental information we
discussed at out meeting last week. As a preliminary matter, I would like to note
two matters,
First, I would like to correct some data previously provided to you. In
compiling data from multiple sources, we made a computation error. The video
we showed indicated that the number of calls taken in June was about 320,000.
The total should have been 271,937. This volume of calls still exceeds any prior
month by a wide margin. The average hold time for customers connecting to a
CCP in St. Paul we reported in our August 4, 1999 letter should also be
corrected to read as follows:
Month Averaqe Hold Time
April 142 seconds>
May 158 seconds
June 182 seconds
. July 227 seCOndS) "
This data also shows the same trend line as the data previously provided to you,
.. v
Coralie A. Wilson
September 1, 1999
Page 2
.
Second, it is important to note that all data we have provided to you to
date, including the data enclosed with this letter, is raw data that does not
measure or relate directly to the compliance standards set forth in the FCC's
rules. The FCC rules set a standard to be met 90% of the time, during normal
operating conditions, (which is a defined term) measured quarterly. Under the
rules, normal operating conditions do not include conditions which are not within
the control of MediaOne. As examples, the rules identify such occurrences as
power outages, telephone network outages, and severe or unusual weather
conditions. Once a determination is made as to when the system is operating
under normal operating conditions, the FCC standard is to be met at least 90
percent of the time, measured on a quarterly basis, As you know, cable
operators are generally not required to perform surveys or generate statistics to
specifically measure compliance, with the FCC standards and MediaOne does
not generally perform such time-consuming surveys and measurements, Rather,
we use and routinely have been providing to you unadjusted data and other
internal benchmarks to measure performance and trends. In any compliance
hearing, of course, the report we have been providing would not be the
appropriate reports. Rather, we would have to go through the labor-intensive
process of calculating and measuring compliance with the FCC's standards and
measurements.
.
Enclosed with this letter are an outlin" nf nur call cflntflr action plnn and
four graphs that indicate the substantial improvement and direction of our call
center performance in August. As we discussed last week, the major objectives
of our action plan are: (1) to reduce the unusually high volume of calls we are
experiencing in our call center; (2) 10 improve the technology used to process
calls, (3) to increase the staffing in our call center; and (4) to improve the
productivity of our call center personnel. The attached action plan lists some of
the steps we are taking to pursue these four objectives. While it is important to
note that the data is not adjusted for FCC measurements and it should not be
used to form conclusions as to compliance with any particular FCC standard, it
does clearly demonstrate that our action plan is resulting in significant
improvement in the performance of our call center.
As we indicated previously, we set high standards for ourselves for
customer service. We continue to believe that we will be operating at a level that
our customers have been accustomed to by the end of October, Once we have
completed the calculation and survey of FCC standards, should that exercise be
requested, we believe we will certainly be in compliance with applicable
standards,
.
Finall ,we discussed last week
acknow edge t e ro ms experienced b so of our customers r centl , The
Commission discussed taking a step such as a free Pay Per View movie coupon
at its August meeting, J/je propose to offer customers a choice of a pay-per-
-
Coralie A, Wilson
September 1, 1999
Page 3
.
View movie coupon or a month of Broadband Monthly entertainment magazine,
We look forward to further discussions of this matter with you.
If you have any questions about the matters in this letter, please do not
hesitate to contact me at 651-312-5280,
Sincerely,
-- (\ .
!) · y// ,A-..
!-~C'(~"~:--yJ.-1ru "~"-'
David G. Seykora" /'
DGS/aps
Enclosure
cc: Thomas D. Creighton
.
.
..
.
.
Outline of MediaOne
Call Center Action Plan
August 1999
Staffinq Issues
. We configured all of our call "queues" to route calls to the first available agent.
This has created a "universal agent" and by-passed the specialized queues
an estimated 20% of the time, While specialized queues allow us to train staff
in specialized areas, it also creates some call routing inefficiencies.
. We implemented mandatory overtime of 7.5% per week for all CCPs. This
mandatory overtime is working across all shifts,
. We continue to monitor ,gustomer Care Professional productivity in an effort
to reduce average talk time anu average wrap time. This will resolve
customer's issues more quickly and make CCPs available to receive calls on
a faster basis.
.
. We have developed a hiring and training schedule for the rest of the year as
follows:
. September 13th - 14 CCPs
. September 2ih - 14 CCPs
. October 11th -14 CCPs
. October 25th - 14 CCPs
. November 8th - 14 CCPs
. November 22nd -14 CCPs
. December 6th -14 CCPs
. We are in the process of designing a new attendance polic)'.. This policy will
reduce instances of CCP absences, -
. We are closely monitoring vacation, sick, and personal time taken by CCPs to
improve call staffing productivity.
IT ISSUES
.
. We have added 23 trunks to our 651-222-3333 telephone number. We now
have a total of 138 trunks to the call center, These additional trunks will
reduce difficulties customers may have experienced in reaching the call
center.
~
.
. n September 15th we plan to discontinue the old telephone numbers in both
the r 0 yn ar (612-533-8020), and Roseville (651-483-9999) ~O3.~......
Consistent with that, we will add an equivalent number of trunks to t 65-
....-222-:.:s3~3 .group, which will further minimize instances of customers receiving
~o::>y ::>,g1'1aj.
. We have implemented a broadcast message feature announcing system
outages and general information. This broadcast message occurs prior to the
customer being routed to our interactive voice response unit ensuring that all
customers contacting the center receive the message. Messages such as
this greatly enhance our ability to deliver messages quickly to a large group of
customers, This frees up trunk time allowing additional customers to contact
the center.
. We plan to implement "intelligent queuing" in the near future. This technology
will allow customers to understand the average length of time they are holding
and determine if calling at a later time would be more convenient.
. We have established procedures to deploy all converters to the field in an
active status. This will minimize the instances of customers contacting the call
center to authorize their converters.
.
. We have identified a new billing system called ICOMS. We have targeted a
launch date of May 1, 2000 to implement a more customer friendly billing
system.
Construction/UpQrade Items
. We have delayed channel line-up activation throughout the month of August.
This has minimized the disruptions caused by channel re-configuration and as
a result, has reduced call volume.
. We have created bill messages and 30 second commercials informing
customers of the "best time to call". We have developed similar 30 second
commercials encouraging customers to utilize our Integrated Voice Response
unit. This makes more agents available to handle calls requiring an agent's
assistance.
. W~bave staqqered our upgrade activfltion schedule more broadly. This will
cause service disruptions to fewer customers within a short time frame and
reduce associated call volume.
.
.
.
.
Traininq Issues
. We are developing and plan to launch a new customer care initiative which
will provide and enhance training to customer care pro essionals and improve
their skill sets,
. We are hiring a Customer Liaiso to handle escalated complaints from local
tranchlse authorities and act as a customer advocate in all aspects of our
day-to-dav business
. We h.ave launched a customer ~ofessional trouble shooting initiative to
reduce instances of unnecessa~olls,
. We are expanding our training hours to include evening and weekend shifts.
This will expand our training activities and improve CCP performance.
Other
. We have revised our collection department's "final due date" and "non-pay
disconnect" dates to avoid high telephone volume days. These dates now
occur only on Tuesdays, Wednesdays and Thursdays to ensure less call
volume to the call center.
. We have escalated efforts to remove Zenith converters in the Anoka area.
This will help eliminate a persistent scrambling problem affecting customers in
that area. Eliminating this technical problem will reduce telephone calls to our
customer service center.
e have "outsourced" a number of customer tele hone calls to a third y
IS WI improve response time for customers callng the center.
,
~
~
lJll::llSIO lOOHJS,
lN30N3d30NI
\ ' "
\ \ "'-
\ \ "
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \
I'
\\ {
\ \ (
"
,\
, ,
, .
\
, ,
f'-.
A
lOOH:)S H!lIH
M31ASONnol'l
~
fit
(~'-"~" OVOl::l
\ )
\J'- ~
\
)
\\
\
~
~
\1 I
, I
i
\'
\"
"
-.-
, I
------.J
----------....-
t.69 'ON Al1MH9IH 31V1Sl::l31NI
C---'7
'"--,
-+---,L/
=----//(
< . (\
)' 'ff!" \ \
v . )/
(\ / /
?b.,:/
.
/c...---.-
~\ 1\
~/\
/
.~\
'-
()
~\ \'
0'
,,21
~
I'T1
if!
I~~
'~r
I
!
.1
l ,,21
,,21
,,8
uE)1I
OVOl::l
A1Nno:>
\
(j
.-!
~o nGO '-
::0
o
tlOi~ d
. '-\\--' ---~ \ --- ~Il~
I - -- - ~\ \ (-\ \\ ~ \, /~;..,
/""-~T"" ~:\\. \ \. l\_, _:\\~/, !fJ9f.l}'
~~"1l-,';'> ',17;ii~:, l' \ ,- \ T u ~\\ \ )'" <'l
I
~- ~~ .VHiVH' '\ \, \ c '~ v '~, . ~____ _\~I I L "Zl I
I z--..L I I___/{), I I tth',---.. ~j \~ ~\ 1\' I l~~,-
' "/, ,,>..,~ '\ \ I \
-- ~-- " i -L.. ~/.f.y '\ '\,' 1f ( \ \ 1'-- r 01
! r____, 1 \~ "" I-I
"-" I I, \ " "
- - / '-, - ~ ~.,.. ., ,
\~,:~-~<--;~ .,--"'-", 'q-.-,- -~' ~.- , ~ I"~ 'HNI1O'\ _, "
:::s>\~. 'p' ~ -- ~~~~ f ,'-'Y\'-. ~~~~:'/' OJA3SL^l\1:J1___
~ /' "'-.'- \"
- '-- "t:i _. "'"
' z: ,'-,.;\ ~_____ '"
' , ~I J Jr----, , //1 ,'_--v \.
~ ,'>-:i:; c---l 1 L ~ II I ""
~ I '-' F''c b 3^V" kJ i,\ ( ') "
d .. ~~ ", - Fit 1 -Ill ~-' 'ONt'",,_ ~~~,,' \ \\
I ""i _ "" " , \ "
I V ~ '- 0 M 'AN310 m ", '" ':?: '\
/s c-----' /' ~ -, 1 L"-, ~' ,>, " '\
' c~ ~'>i -'- 3' .1V~r ....J.
r L - ro I"" ~1 \ \; \
-0., ,- '" ~\
It.. >", ,,\..' ",,' < , ^
r I ", ~,.' ~ .... ~ \ \, ~
' I "II, '" m < 1\ \ " l
,../ I ~ ~ ,,' \ \ , \
" ~ lViSA., ..--- '" \
' ~ ,^V L----- 1<9 ON \1, \
~ 'j" ^S '\', \I
" D1.iS'O 100Ho , '\
h \ "" ( 'ft ~ .." ,- 30N' \ \ \ \
/I, , _ iN30N3d \ \ I 'I
"r\ ,,____ ____ \, \ "
v-iw' ....~..,' \\, I \
' t.' ..~ " ~ '00,,, '''' " " \
~ ~ -\~ ~/ ~ #{'-~~ --J ~ rr~ ",,'saN"OO \~>.." \
. ~~ h--------- ~ ' ,~ ---<...i... . " , ',I
9 C ,~~'\ J\~ ". " '~ '
j ,.;:.1 ,,9 ~~ ,- -< \ 1J_~ }0 \ I I~~" '''" 0\10. ,,' "iN"""
F- \ '3 A'fj ')I~\1d ,-:, -~r- \ ~) I i, 'I /'
.' " -,,, , "" I" "
'/' -\ii,,~ ~ ~--""2-..,! " l}/':
;, '" ,-' r- ~ . ~ ,
: \ · \ t ~N'j"31"A, ~ i, i'Ntr__.___ r,
~--'---J
~ j
)
\ \
'\
~!~'1
.f'
~
~
,
.._.
\1
~,
,
-+
-\
-4
~-:
1
''fjMH~IH 31V1S~31.NI
t169 'ON ^
,,21
,---,/
.....
'-...- ,.......) I
('<'~ " '--.../ I
-L.~ J.; ) .ZL
~~ ~f=: {-~ /(
r;;ZI't1~OHu)lr-'d-' 1 HI. \)
W1 ~ ~ )/
..~ if.""s \,.-:4/ ~
~I~. '~ j
'# ".# "
'''J' if"" ~ ~ '"
~~"',(
~ l
~
\\~~
3.. ~ (\
\V
"
/
"~
ZI
" ~^~
:.3 N lS l#~1
'~
'1-
I
j
-u
. ?I
~r~r~~~,
~L1P--~
J ~ c
~
,
~~
. '1 \;;:0111
ARDEN HILLS RESIDENTIAL WATER METER REPLACEMENT PROJECT
. Within the coming months the City Why do we need radio read meters? then be added to the homeowner's
of Arden Hills will be replacing or Cities throughout the nation are water bill for the replaced valve, but
upgrading all residential water converting all types of utility meters this must be done at the time that the
meters, Those meters 10 years of age to some form of automatic reading new meter is installed.
and older will be replaced with new technology, Radio read is best suited for
meters with radio read capabilities. most applications. Currently, all six Why do I need the valve replaced?
Those meters less than 10 years old Public Works employees spend about You do not. However, if you ever need
will not be replaced, but will be one week each quarter, depending on to shut off your water in an emergency
upgraded only to radio read weather, reading water meters. When or if you wish to replace an unvalved
technology, the replacement/upgrade is completed it appliance or do other plumbing work,
is expected that one person will be able having a reliable shut off valve is very
Why is the City doing this now? to read the entire City in two days. useful. If the City is called to shut off
Many of the City's 2350 residential the water at the curb, there is a $25,00
meters were installed in the late When will this project start and who charge.
sixties and have outlived their will be doing it?
intended life of 20 years, Each Meter replacement/upgrade will likely Why wouldn't I hire my own
quarter following meter reads an start yet this year and be completed by plumber to replace a bad valve?
average of 25 meters are identified January I, 2001. A Massachusetts The contracted meter installer has
with some type of problem which Company, USI, will be doing the quoted the City for replacing a
leads to repair or replacement. scheduling and installation, The goal is defective valve with a new quality
that most installations can be valve. This price should be less than
Who pays for the replacement or accomplished during normal working calling your plumber. The City does
upgrade? hours, but expect some appointments encourage you to check prices if you
The City has set aside a small portion after hours and on Saturdays, think you may have a defective valve,
of each water bill for future
maintenance, repairs, mid upgrades to Will I be without water during the Is there anyway I can tell if my
the City water system. These monies installation? valves are subject to failure?
. are available and will be used to Yes. However, a typical installation If you know your water ,service was
cover the replacement. No additional with no problems will take less than y, installed between 1960 and 1975, and
resident cost participation will be hour. your valves are the Red and White
required. brand (i,e, the turning handle is actually
What problems can there be? painted red and white). the failure rate
What is this radio read technology? About the only problem installers expect is very high. You can also turn on any
With a radio read meter, the reader is when defective valves on either side faucet then turn off the valve on the
need only drive to the front of the of the water meter fail. This does not street side of the meter. If valve
home in most instances, key in the allow the installer to easily shut off the operates smoothly and shuts water off
code on the hand held interrogator water so the meter can be replaced. and on several times it is probably
and the meter is awakened, In less okay,
than a second the meter radios back What happens then?
the identification number, tamper The installer has several options. He What is the next step for me?
codes and gallons of water nsed, will have equipment to freeze the water Wait until you are contacted by a
This information is then stored in the line where it enters the stmcturc, thus representative from the City's
hand held interrogator and down shutting off the water. He can subcontractor, USI meter installation
loaded into the billing files at the end temporarily crimp the water line, or he company, to schedule an appointment.
of the day, can have the water shut off at the street.
All meter installers and City Worker's
Can these radio signals be harmful Will he then replace tbe defective associated with the water replacement
to my health? valve? /upgrade will have USI or Arden Hills
No. The meter will only generate The water meter itself is owned and ID tags and similar identified vehicles,
a signal for about one second each maintained by the City. The valves on
billing cycle when awakened by the each side of the meter are the property of Thank you in advance for your help
(eader. This signal could be the homeowners. If the meter installer and cooperation in helping this project
compared in strength to that of a encounters a faulty valve he will notify run as smoothly as possible.
. garage door remote control. The rest the homeowner and give them the option
of the time the meter radio of having it replaced at that time, A cost
transmitter is in the sleep mode, of $86,00, including sales tax, would
.
SUMP PUMP INSPECTIONS IN THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
The City of Arden Hills Sump Pump
Inspection program is designed to help
homeowners identify cross-connected
sump pumps or other improper clear
water connections, so they can be
properly connected.
What is a cross connection?
A cross connection is a sump pump or
other pipe carrying clear water that is
connected either directly or indirectly to a
sanitary sewer line, Often, a sump pump
connection is a hose leading into a
laundry tub or a floor drain. Sump
pumps are supposed to drain into stonn
sewers, either through a direct connection
(a pipe from the home connecting with
the main stonn sewer line), or through
draining directly onto the ground outside
the home.
. Why are cross connections a problem?
Sump water is what engineers call "clear
water," most often rainwater, ground
water, or snow melt This water is clean
enough to drain directly into streams,
ponds, and lakes without treatment.
Wastewater - water from your sinks,
showers, tubs, toilets, and washing
machines - must be treated at your
metropolitan wastewater treatment plant
before it can be safely discharged into the
environment.
When "clear water" is added to
wastewater, it can overload the collection
system. The Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency (MPCA) has estimated that a
single home with a cross connected sump
pump can add up to 1,400 gallons of
water to the system during one average
rain stonn, That's the equivalent of
flushing your toilet 280 times (based on a
standard toilet with a five gallon tank - if
you have a low-flow toilet with a three
gallon tank, you'd have to flush 466
limes), Multiply that by the number of
. homes in your neighborhood, and the
magnitude of the problem
becomes evident.
Why should I care?
Excess water in the sanitary
sewer can overload the system
and it also costs the city, and
you, money. Also, rates set by
the Metropolitan Council for
treating wastewater are based on
number of gallons that flow
through the system. Therefore,
everyone pays to treat water
from illegal sump pump
connections.
Are cross connections the only
cause of this?
No, Water can infiltrate the
system through bad joints,
cracks, or breaks in the sanitary
sewer pipe leading from your
home to the street. Arden Hills
inspects the interior of the public
sanitary sewer pipe with TV
cameras so these problems can
be found and corrected.
How do I know ifI have a
cross-connected sump pump?
The key thing to look for is
where the water goes when the
sump pump is running. If you
have a rigid, PVC-type pipe that
goes outdoors and drains into
your yard (well away from your
foundation, or course), you're
probably okay, If you have a
hose that drains into your
laundry tub or floor drain, this is
an illegal connection. If you can
see right away that your sump
pump is cross-connected, it
would be to your advantage to
get it rerouted prior to
inspection, This will save you
time, as only one inspection will
need to be done to confirm your
correction. If you're not sure,
enclosed illustrative connection diagrams
may help you decide. If you still can't
tell, the inspectors williet you know, and
you will have time to get the problem
corrected before a surcharge is applied.
If you are rerouting your system, be sure
to buy the right kind of pipe. It must be a
rigid, plastic pipe, not flexible hose. The
attached illustration shows one type of a
proper connection.
When will an inspector visit my home?
Most likely within the next year. Water
meter installers contracted by the City
will be doing the inspection, along with
the water meter replacement project
scheduled to begin this fall, These meter
installers will also have training for sump
pump cross-connection identification.
Why inspect my house?
Neither your property nor neighborhood
has been singled out for any reason, All
Arden Hills homes and business with
sanitary sewer connections will be
inspected. In the next eighteen months,
inspections will be completed in over
2,000 Arden Hills properties.
What will correcting a sump pump
cross connection cost me?
If you do the work yourself, less than
$50, assuming your basement is
unfmished and you already have a sump
pump, If an outside contractor is used,
most corrections will be at least $300,
again assuming your sump pump is in
place and it's just a matter of replacing
flexible pipe and/or rerouting your flow.
(Connection Diagrams
on Reverse Side)
<-
.
E*lcir foundIIlan clrIln
opteml--"
. ~a.uQ
w..A..tI_ .
"
1dIrJ-
PROHIBITED' CONNECTfON
.
.At!._
Roof....... Ir .... will
.......
"
. ,
"'f'l-
IdIrJ -
.
PROPER CONNECTION
09/16/99 THU 08:04 FAX 6126337839
TRANSMISSION OK
TX/RX NO
CONNECTION TEL
CONNECTION ID
ST, TIME
USAGE T
PGS, SENT
RESULT
.
.
City of Arden Hills
~001
*********************
*** TX REPORT ***
*********************
0110
6516286833
09/16 08:03
00'39
2
OK
09/16/99 THU 08:05 FAX 6126337839
TRANSMISSION OK
TX/RX NO
CONNECTION TEL
CONNECTION ID
ST, TIME
USAGE T
PGS, SENT
RESULT
.
.
City of Arden Hills
~001
...
*********************
...
TX REPORT
*********************
0111
6516339550
09/16 08:04
00'37
2
OK
09/16/99 THU 08:06 FAX 6126337839
TRANSMISSION OK
TXlRX 'io
CoNNECTIo'i TEL
CONNECTION ID
ST, TIME
USAGE T
PGS, SENT
RESULT
.
.
City of Arden Hills
141 001
*********************
*** TX REPORT ***
*********************
0112
6516333846
09116 08:05
01'19
2
OK
09/16/99 THU 08:08 FAX 6126337839
TRANSMISSION OK
TXlRX NO
CONNECTION TEL
CONNECTION ID
ST, TIME
USAGE T
PGS, SENT
RESULT
.
.
City of Arden Hills
~001
*********************
... TX REPORT ...
*********************
0113
6514810551
09/16 08: 07
00'53
2
OK
09/16/99 THU 08:09 FAX 6126337839
TRANSMISSION OK
TX/RX NO
CONNECTION TEL
CONNECTION 10
ST, TIME
USAGE T
PGS, SENT
RESULT
.
.
City of Arden Hi 11 s
141 001
*********************
*** TX REPORT ***
*********************
0114
6514821262
09/16 08:08
00'50
2
OK
09/16/99 THU 08:10 FAX 6126337839
TRANSMISSION OK
TXlRX NO
CONNECTION TEL
CONNECTION ID
ST, TIME
USAGE T
PGS, SENT
RESULT
.
.
Ci ty of Arden Hills
I€J 001
*********************
*** TX REPORT ***
*********************
0115
6123701378
09/16 08:10
00'47
3
OK
09/16/99 THU 08: 11 FAX 6126337839
TRANSMISSION OK
TX/RX NO
CONNECTION TEL
CONNECT I ON In
ST, TIME
USAGE T
PGS. SENT
RESULT
.
.
CIty of Arden Hills
\g] 001
.s*******************
u*
TX REPORT
u*
*s*******************
0116
6512281753
09/16 08: 11
00'37
2
OK
.
.
.
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
September 14, 1999
TO:
Mayor and City Council
Terrauce R. Post, Interim City Administrator @
Administrator Comments for the September 20, 1999 Couucil
Worksessiou
FROM:
SUBJECT:
1. Miscellaneous Items
Department Heads may update the City Council on items of note in their areas and may
seek Council direction on some issues,
2. Discussion Itcms
a.
North Suburban Cable Commission (NSCC) Update
Arden Hills Commission representative, Dave Sand, will update the Council on
the status of MediaOne franchise compliance issues, disposition of tines being
assessed, and discuss the 2000 NSCC proposed budget.
b. Old Hil!:hwav 10 Watermain Extension Petitiou
Council will have an opportunity to discuss more fully the issues surrounding this
requested water utility capital project. Council is asked to direct staff on how to
respond to the petitioners,
c. Pavement Manal!:ement Plan (PMPV2000 Proiect Scopc
City Engineer Greg Brown made an initial presentation on several modifications
to the PMP at the August 16, 1999 Council Worksession. At that time, staff and
Mr. Brown were directed to make recommendations for candidate projects for
proposed 2000 street improvement projects and link this action into the proposed
five-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Mr. Brown is recommending that the
Ingerson neighborhood be the project scope area in 2000 and that Council
consider using budgeted 1999 funds on this project rather than Round Lake Road,
Phase II.
d. Comprehensive Plan Update - Status Report
Staff is planning to meet with representatives of the Metropolitan Council on
Thursday, September 16, 1999 to discuss the status of the City's Comprehensive
Plan update submittal to the agency, The City was earlier advised of some
deficiencies noted by the agency review team,
.
.
.
Administrator Comments for the September 20, 1999 Council W orksession
Page Two
September 14, 1999
e. City Administrator Hirine Process
At the September 13, 1999 Council mecting, the City Council directed each
Councilmember to rate the remaining fourteen (14) applicant packages and
identify the top five candidates, The Council will discuss and seek consensus as a
group on the candidates it wishes to schedule interviews with, Council had
previously identified Monday, October 4th and Tuesday, October 5th, 1999 as
being acceptable interview dates.
After selecting the five (5) candidates it wishes to interview, Council may also
consider if it wishes the interview candidates to complete any additional
supplemental application questions to provide further examples of written
communication skills,
F :\USERS\SHEILA \COUNCIL \Administrator Comments\ WORKSESS\ W9-20-99 .doc
.
.
.
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
September 2, 1999
TO:
Terry Post, Interim City Administrator
FROM:
Dwayne Stafford, Public Works Director
Petition for City Water Service y~
SUBJECT:
Background
The Arden Hills City Council considered installation of a segment of water line on Old Highway
10, south of Highway 96 to Wedgewood Circle in 1996. This is the only developed area of the
City not served by City water and affects sixteen (16) properties. Benefits of installing this
waterline would include a continuous looped system around Round Lake, fire hydrants, and
domestic service to the property owners.
In May of 1996, an informational meeting was held concerning the possible project. All those
affected by the proposed project were invited and most attended. At that meeting several
residents spoke against the project and two (2) spoke in favor. Many others had questions such as
assessment costs, restoration, a possible trail, and water quality, Following this meeting, plans
and specifications were completed for the project and included replacement of a section of
watermain on Old Highway 10 between Lake Valentine Road and Valentine A venue, which was
known to be defective. The City Engineer estimated the cost for both projects would be $95,000.
The City advertised and received bids for the project in July of 1996 and the low bid was
$139,972.50. This exceeded the original cost estimate by $45,000, Staff surmised that the time
of the bidding, the short completion date, and the amount of construction work available
contributed to the higher than expected bids. With the high bids and limited resident support for
the project, staff recommended Council reject all bids, which they did. Residents were then
notified of that decision and no complaints were received. Public Works Staff subsequently
replaced the failing section of water main on Old Highwayl0, between Lake Valentine Road and
Valentine Avenue, as an internal project.
Petition
The City of Arden Hills received the attached petition August 24, 1999. The petitioners ask that
the City reinstate the project for the year 2000. It appears that twelve ofthe eighteen current
property owners have signed the petition,
Recommendation
The Public Works Director recommends Council discuss the project at their September
Worksession and provide staff direction on how to proceed with the request.
e
e
e
,
478 N. McCarroM!S Boulevard
R05eville, MN 55113
August 18, 1999
Mr. Dwayne Stafford
Public Work5 Superintendent
City of Arden HilI5
4364 We5t Round Lake Road
Arden HiII5, MN 55112
AUG 2 4 1999
crii Lf i~'"_"_'.'
Dear Mr. Stafford:
Subject:
Ea5t Round Lake Water Main Project
The Arden HilI5 City Council approved plan5 to fini5h an uncompleted 5egment of water
main running along Old Highway 10 during the 5ummer of 1996.
A5 5tated in your letter of July 22, 1996 (copY enclo5ed), no acceptable bid5 were
received due to the late 5ea50n on bid reque5t5 for that 5ummer.
The completion of thl5 project will give the City the final link to it'5 water 5Y5tem and
give the City the needed fire protection for thi5 area.
Enclo5ed 15 a 1i5ting of the re5ident5 that wi5h to petition the City to rein5tate the
bid proce55 at thi5 time. Thi5 will provide the City with time to reque5t and review bid5 well
in advance of the upcoming con5tructlon 5ea5on to enable the authorization of thi5 work to
be completed by the term5 in which the Council agreed.
Your attention to thi5 matter i5 appreciated.
Sincerely,
;(lJd. ~_
David F. Cmiel
Enclo5ure5
Water Main Petition
e
I request that the City of Arden Hiils rein5tate the East Round Lake Water Main Project as
previously approved by the City.
Print Property Owner Name
Address
Sic-mature
fZj l 4v
Lheo7H'/ A Iie:LLV2-
7icrras L. NeLler
])/ ftlVv t? - lIE-I--
j)i/1IIP F. CJvt/~ .p,;:Xx: tJUJ UWY /0
Sc ;! [-t!MJt
?Pfl(, (;eu. Lf!.;77 Old
-
8~
05"5
la
.
"'f<.5X~ cJt...D ffwy /(J
1-1' *
X O!Q. '//. 10
e
PCU!()Tlty,#. Itc;uoe.. L/4XY ()I-/J HWY /d
~--., .
4'-1("f --elL I
,0 ~t:> -E (I
iPtlul! cf!t.-EIJtJI.JSfl ~/:> 7r d/ !lJ
'---u/'<J'.J}Ll----~~;., IAA..!':--\ '-{'-{fo I\I~ ID
~~
~ ,:-Q 4-[--\-
e
.
.
.
AUG-25-1999 11:42
BRW
612 370 1378 P.01/03
.BRW
- A~"&MiXRE"Gt:iOUPcxiMPAI'tiV
FAXTRANSMITT AL
BRW
Thresher Square
700 Third Street South
Minneapol1s, MN 55415
Phone: (61Z) 370-0700
Fax: (612) 370.1378
TO:
Terry Post! Arden Hills
FAX: 651-633-7839
FROM: Greg Brown
DATE: August 25,1999
RE: PMP Scope Notes
.....l.. Page(s) Including Cover Sheet
Please Contact (612) 370-0700 if you have any problem, regarding this transmittal.
AUG-25-1999 11:42
BRW
512 370 1378 P.02/03
.
Proposed 2000 PMP Project Scope: Ingerson Neighborhood
Budget
General Fund: $ 30,000.00 (Sealcoating)
$200,000.00 (1999 - West Round Lake Road)
$240,000.00 (2000 Program)
$380.000.00 (Assessments based upon $40.001FF)
$250,000.00 (Pipe and Catch Basins, doesn't include ponds)
$495000.00 ancludes $65 000 00 advance funding)
$1,595,000.00
PIR Fund:
Storm Utility
State Aid
Estimated Construction Costs;
Sealcoating: Streets to be determined
Ingerson Road: 32' wide, storm sewer, C&G @ $250fLF
Cannon Ave: 28' wide, Slorm sewer, C&G @ $225/LF
Carlton Drive: 28' wide, C&G @ $200fLF
Femwood St.: 28' wide, C&G @ $200fLF
Femwood Ct.: 24' wide, C&G @ $160fLF
Ingerson Ct.: 16' wide driveway/alley @ $1001LF
Total Estimated Construction Cost
Overhead Costs @ 26%
Total Estimated Project Costs
'" $ 30,000.00
= $650,000.00
= $105,000.00
= $300,000.00
= $ 75,000.00
= $ 60,000.00
= $ 45.000.00
$1,265,000.00
$ 330.000.00
$1,595,000.00
.
Notes! Assumptions
"Cannon Avenue becomes a cui de sac at TH 51
*Ti lIer Lane becomes a cui de sac at TH 51
.. Hamline A venue is vacated between Tiller Lane and Ingerson Road
.. Cannon Avenue is vacated between Tiller Lane and proposed cui de sac
.. Ramline Avenue. Tiller Lane, Dunlap Street and Dellwood do not receive any work as a part of Ihis
project.
* Storm sewer costs on Carlton Drive, Femwood Court and Femwood Street are anticipated to be
minor assuming existing catch basins and storm sewer can be reutilized.
.
Projected PMP Projects
2002: West Round Lake Road Phase 2
2004: Benton Way, Hunters Court and Waldon Place
2006: Edgewater Neighborhood
2008: RidgewoodlGlenarden Neighborhoods
2010: RidgewoodlGlenarden Neighborhoods
2012: RidgewoodlGJenarden Neighborhoods
2014: ThomDrive
2016: Noble Neighborhood
2018: Glenpaul Neighborhood
2020: Glenhill Neighborhood
2022: Valentine Neighborhood
2024: Glenview Neighborhood
.
.
.
AUG-25-1999 11:42
BRW
612 370 1378 P.03/03
2026; Glenview Neighborhood
2028: Sandeen Neighborhood
Hamline Avenue, Snelling Avenue, Lake Johanna Blvd. and Fernwood Avenues could be
reconstructed as State Aid funds permit. currently accruing at $200,OOO.OO/yr.
City streets will also be overlayed based upon PCl rating and neighborhood considerations.
TOTAL P.03
.'
PLOT CA.l,'.
'j 11 1999 3:29t'1m DISK FILE NAME: (14.01' R:\ARDENH1L\37951\37951010\llln-shts\OOr
'LJ~~)",,','~',', ~:~'\""'\"--""'~' ~ ,",
:~~[~~~
\ II J ///i,;,,~ ~c:'~:,~~
VIK
:,.s ,'{ "W. ROUND LAKE RD
,~ ~RANK=21
'~.. COST ~ $1,500,000
, 3i '~-
~wo
"I
11
I
'.)
.
I
\
/..o~
~D
,// j,'
'C '/,"
. ,"......
, '7
, ,
f'l",n,;e
\::_:"'~
{'-;:) ~
~J J J", -V~. \--:::::J_
,,~, T~'> =~==\= ~ c= ~ ~\ \":~~l
~f~ "j"-"
" '.' .,',:::"., ~j fi_ 11' ,_\-- " "\ "',
, '~A,: \:~ V Of .. . ,;'
'.,., /~ .~.
,y ~ ~ 'I"" cf\\C I!,'
(" ri:""\\ "
u= I",,> C;.'-
)1
.!
~
,,'.'
,I
"
'l.
Q~"",.
",.~,..
/lilt<
,13lH $T': N.E. '" _ ~~ \
<X'\:'",jE"' _ L
VALENTINE LA, ""'\
RANK = 18 ,--.J ," ....^<..
COST = to.aOZ ~ <1~el'= l:"" ~-'" ,)
~()' - ..~~.~..,
i / '!i 1/ ~~/'f'1h\;\ \
," D,"-(b-,!,I;N"-,,) / ; ~(..+<" ~) 0,: '
"0"'1, W .or.: (l "'":
f, = $775,000 " ~, .. "," '," ~
.."," .. c i/(~m~;miit"~ I~ ':,
\,.,.") ~::..n..,.....:'~.~.>.....:-._..... _~~Z:~{:}::r'~ }/ '_".
''\:,'!:) ~" ;;'1t:! *'2W;~Yiiw:/\ ,d) ~~~~V1~l'!h rg
\ ,r-"", (;- C. COST ~ $2.225.000 )/';,
"'....,,/ CO, RD. ELt,', ....i..."........., "" }..........',",'" A '''\
, ~\,-.>-y~,',. ,(" -- ~ .--/ ~>,~~,~ --._"~
"
~~~ g~"'l ), Ii) ."..'.,. ~,'f/
: _~" "'j" / \~2ii i;5'
gRI~riT()I\.WP., (' ~~~)( 1.0 '"""',
';:~Kr :: $".~:;,..'iU""\,j 1-- ,..""
,__ J", FJq.( "'\
r"
....,,'.' I ~
S \ CHATH",!
., Wl<> ~~~~ :: ~~~5,OOO "".,',,'"
'\.')'6.KE... ' ',,/ ~~,
""o,'JOHANNA ~"-'''' I ~'i, '
~(;/"""'-""''''''''// : L f;~j.
:.::::::::::-:::::-::::::.::::::::: STowr
~~ i- ~AhK -'" 20 COST - $2JOO,OOOl
'-... STOv.E AVE" ,_",,- ! ,:,,~, ~ $0.00
" ~ ;JS ",-..>< g:::;"" ~;:;'~ ;;00000 ,
j 2lb \~ /" -~ r,,~ '0\ ;:~'~'~ 19-----~
"ERROlOOAVE ~" ~2:::\'>,\>.v~~:::,,~ :~:3'S' ~:l50'p)(1''' ..'"",,':""
j EDGEWt::TI1 AVE '% ~\ )~~' j ~'
"~~ .;1.. \~, \ {.1~~J\i ~,~\\
','j':', \ LAKe, JOHANNA i;,S'
RANK ~ 22
COST ~ $1,325,000
IiI "''''WAY CT
lit
/?
"./
(
~
if
~
""",{,:-:'il
'("
f
I I
III
{'\~
i:,,/~
b
<I
ld
&
""
(>.:;;
(,J l,,)
~i,\,
~
, ,
( !~D 'fo,KS
,.' '\RA 7
'COST 0.00
L'
-''''~
II I
L I
:p/
,i,'..,~
[~~
Ii.I" ,J)
N7
~ ~
\
----
":(-
l;!
-<
z
(' !
T,.;OM
RANK = 5
COST ~ $700,0
w. co. RD. E
NOBLE
RANK = 6
COST ~ $950,000
1((:'
~:;:
V "'~
BENTON WAY
RANK ~ 8
...' COST ~ $900,000
"" ,:j
er'
/.- '..;s"
l' ,
:'::,:,:,::;:::J1..Wl::P>t::,::::':"""
'J.
,
-:::::(:~]:::::::-
'o/ 1 \!P;IIi
........... ..-..-.....--.......
.m............................
"~A1i~i:9iiD~/
~m ':':fWNL
...........................
" J~1
>J:/>a::'.~:>;;:-,.-.-..-,.-:..-,.-.-..-
\.._~~ .:~7-:~~V4~~ ~VE
~~~~Sti2,075.aoo<<\.
/.Iffi;';
\1f5:,: 5,
,j,: "
EDGEW:TER I . c RD. D
RANK - 1 I
COST = $575,000
XREF DRAWINGS
AROUlASl'
I) B RW 7~N~~~1 ~ :J CITY OF AROEN HIlLS
CO'2l"o-o,oo (m) . o.portm""t of Public Works
(612 370-1378 (fAX)
__ A DAMES &.MOORE GROUP COMPANY
1999 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
NEIGHBORHOOD PRIORITY PLAN