The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About08-10-26-WSMayor: David Grant Councilmembers: Brenda Holden Emily Rousseau Tena Monson Kurt Weber City Council Work Session Agenda August 10, 2026 5:00 p.m. City Hall Address: 1245 W Highway 96 Arden Hills MN 55112 Phone: 651-792-7800 Website: www.cityofardenhills.org City Vision Arden Hills is a strong community that values its unique environmental setting, strong residential neighborhoods, vital business community, well -maintained infrastructure, fiscal soundness, and our long-standing tradition as a desirable City in which to live, work, and play. Members of the public may attend a meeting in -person at City Hall or they may view the meeting remotely on the City's website using the below link. Meetings are also broadcast on Cable Channel 16 for those that live in Arden Hills. https://cityofardenhills.org/320/Watch-City-Meetings Some Councilmembers may be participating in this meeting by interactive technology/remotely. This meeting will be streamed live on local Cable Channel 16 and available for playback on our website. CALL TO ORDER 1. PUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL This is an opportunity for citizens to respectfully bring to the Council's attention any items which are relevant to the City. In addressing the Council, you must first state your name and address for the record. Comments shall be limited to three (3) minutes or less. Written documents or other materials should be handed to the City Clerk for distribution to the Council prior to or during the meeting. Council will generally not respond at the same meeting where an issue is initially raised by a member of the public but the Council may refer the issue to staff for further research and possible report or action at a future Council meeting. 2. RESPONSE TO PUBLIC INQUIRIES 3. AGENDA ITEMS 3.A. Mounds View High School Parking David Swearingen, Public Works Director/City Engineer Lucas Miller, Assistant Public Works Director Documents: MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF 3.13. Recycling SCORE Update Jen Estling, Deputy Clerk Julie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk Documents: MEMO.PDF 3.C. 2027-2031 CIP Discussion Gayle Bauman, Contracted Interim Finance Director Documents: MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENTS.PDF 3.D. Code Of Conduct Jessica Jagoe, City Administrator Documents: MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF ATTACHMENT C.PDF ATTACHMENT D.PDF ATTACHMENT E.PDF 3.E. Immigration Enforcement Discussion Jessica Jagoe, City Administrator Documents: MEMO.PDF 3.F. Rice Creek Commons/TCAAP Discussion Jessica Jagoe, City Administrator Documents: MEMO.PDF 3.G. Agenda Planning Jessica Jagoe, City Administrator Documents: MEMO.PDF ATTACHMENT A.PDF ATTACHMENT B.PDF 4. COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS ADJOURN AGENDA ITEM - 3A MEMORANDUM DATE: August 10, 2026 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Jessica Jagoe, City Administrator FROM: Lucas Miller, Assistant Public Works Director David Swearingen, P.E. Public Works Director / City Engineer SUBJECT: Parking restriction signage for Mounds View High School discussion Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A Council Should Consider Council should discuss the existing conditions of the parking restriction signage intended to restrict student parking in the adjacent residential neighborhoods. Background Signage is in place that is specific to MVHS parking that apply to the adjacent neighborhood streets. The signage reads, "SCHOOL DAYS 2 HR PARKING 7:OOAM TO 3:OOPM". These are posted at Janet Ct., Fairview Ave., and Crystal Ave. as shown in Attachment A. There is No Parking signage along the entire length of Lake Valentine Rd. Page 1 of 2 Over the years, residents have submitted complaints of persistent student parking on City streets. City staff coordinated with the Ramsey County Sheriff Office (RCSO) and with MVHS staff to come up with the best solution which at the time was determined to be the current parking restrictions. Other feedback, RCSO report that it is difficult to enforce due to the time limit and would prefer No Parking at all during the school hours. Residents have said they still want the ability to park on the street during the restricted hours. The current layout has evolved to what it is today trying to balance simpler enforceability while also not completely restricting parking on the streets for use by the residents. Discussion City staff believes this is more of an enforcement issue but is open to feedback for an alternative solution. This discussion was added by City Council as a work session topic. Generally, for changes to on -street parking restrictions, staff has experience with this discussion being brought forward by a resident/neighborhood so that the City knows there is a consensus amongst the residents. In this case, staff does not have information from the neighborhood on the desired approach. One example, the streets adjacent to Roseville High School have No Parking 9am to 2pm September through May signage placed every 100-ft on both sides of the street throughout the neighborhood. Roseville staff provided feedback that the residents that live in the neighborhood are also not allowed to park on the street. They said this has been the case for a long time and they have never heard of an issue from a resident about lack of parking during the day. Options for on -street parking restrictions to discuss: • Leave the current "no parking" signage as is • Modify the "no parking" signage to a specific time period of expanded hours such as 9am to 2pm (or other window of time if there is a broader concern about on -street parking during school events or evening activities) • Modify the "no parking" signage to 24/7 year round • Expand the map area to post "no parking" on other streets It should be noted that residents would be required to apply to the City for a temporary parking permit since any parking restriction would apply to their use of the roadway for personal or guest parking. Council may consider requesting a complainant take the initiative to coordinate a petition in order to gain a sense of preferred approach or direct staff to conduct a survey of the adjacent neighborhoods on any or all the above options. City Council is asked to discuss and provide direction to staff on "no parking" signage in the areas adjacent to MVHS. Council should also consider if any potential change to on -street parking restrictions needs to be unanimously supported by the abutting property owners or by majority support. Attachments Attachment A — Existing parking restriction signage locations Page 2 of 2 v% 0 CO �� U h Q� 41� 1 S2,131 j M31/1773a � W y 2 M31/121/b'� � � 08 S771H ON17708 S� �1 �15��1/V/- - - AGENDA ITEM - 3B s 75 Years MEMORANDUM DATE: August 10, 2026 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Jessica Jagoe, City Administrator FROM: Jen Estling, Deputy Clerk SUBJECT: SCORE Incentive Funds Update Budgeted Amount: Estimated Amount: Funding Source: N/A $2,350 plus remaining Recycling Fund SCORE Incentive Funds Council Should Consider Council should discuss and provide direction on use of remaining SCORE Incentive funds for initiatives in 2026. Background/Discussion Following Recycling Day this spring, there are two remaining recycling initiatives that have traditionally been offered by the City in recent years — a fall Cleanup Day event (held at Recycling Technologies to recycle two items for free) and Christmas lights disposal. Below illustrates the approximate costs for these two remaining initiatives as well as a potential net cost to the City: Fall Cleanup Day (approx.) $3,200 Christmas Lights disposal (approx.) $ 575 Total for these two events: $3,775 Available 2026 SCORE Funds $1,420 Remaining Cost to the City (approx.) $2,350 Due to a grant award from Ramsey County to purchase recycling carts this year, a budget adjustment was completed to recognize such which resulted in a $20,000 net positive impact on the Recycling Fund's ending fund balance. Considering the $20,000 in City dollars earmarked for recycling initiatives, Staff recommends moving forward with the two recycling events as indicated above and that the City cover the expected cost of approximately $2,350. Attachments None AGENDA ITEM - 3C MEMORANDUM DATE: August 10, 2026 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Jessica Jagoe, City Administrator and Gayle Bauman, Contracted Finance Director FROM: Julie Hanson, Assistant to the City Administrator/City Clerk SUBJECT: Continuation of 2027-2031 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Discussion Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: The City Council will continue its July 27, 2026 work session discussion as it relates to the 2027-2031 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Attached are the July 27 memo and attachments for public reference. Page 1 of 1 July 27, 2026 CIP MEMO AND ATTACHMENTS AGENDA ITEM - 3B ,!Tt -ADEN HILLS MEMORANDUM DATE: July 27, 2026 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Jessica Jagoe, City Administrator FROM: Gayle Bauman, Contracted Interim Finance Director SUBJECT: 2027 — 2031 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A Various Council Should Consider Provide feedback to staff on Preliminary 2027 2031 CIP Plan. Background Annually, the City prepares a five (5) year Capital Improvement Plan for budgeting and forecasting. The focus of the CIP is on the maintenance and protection of the City's existing assets, redevelopment, and investment in new initiatives. The CIP is part of the budget process, but it is not a budget; it is a plan, and one that changes often. The CIP does not commit the council to the proposed projects, nor implement the assumptions made during the preparation; however, this is the basis for the 2027 Budget as we continue with its preparation. The City has a finite amount of resources, so prioritizing and then being able to finance projects is crucial for ensuring the city's long-term sustainability and being responsible stewards of the city's investments. Staff has been working on completing a comprehensive study of the City's current and future needs for infrastructure projects to better estimate project costs and ensure more accurate forecasting of available fund balances. Discussion A preliminary plan has been prepared and is attached which includes a summary of projects, detailed project sheets, sources of funds, and estimated fund balances (since the operating budgets have not yet been completed, these fund balances are estimated operating costs). Please note that project timelines are subject to change and that the current timeline is City Staff s best estimate. The 2026-2030 CIP was a $47.3 million plan, while the proposed 2027-2031 CIP is listed for $42.4 million in expenditures. This is a 10.3% decrease from the previous year's program or $4,875,476. The largest increase is in Parks due to the addition of the Natural Resources Restoration and County Road Trail projects, the increase in the cost of the Lake Johanna Blvd Trail project and changes in cost assumptions. The decrease in Streets is because there were three PMP projects included in the Page 1 of 4 2026-2030 CIP, whereas two PMP projects are included within the 2027-2031. Water is down due to removing the TCAAP projects (these are funded with sources outside of the Water Fund). PIR Fund • The City has about $60 million of streets and trails (based on 29.42 miles of city streets). Estimating the useful life of these assets at 40 years would require an annual investment of approximately $1.5 million. The current funding sources, which consist of the tax levy, Municipal State Aid, and special assessments account for about $1.5M on average per year for 2027-2031, due to the tax levy increase included in the 2026 budget. • A property tax levy of $430,000 is being proposed for 2027, which is unchanged from 2026. Based on potential projects, this amount should be increased to ensure there is appropriate funding to meet future project expenditures. • Current projections include prepayments of special assessments, which is based on a 5-year historical collection rate of 40%. • The Old Highway 10 Trail project is programmed for 2027 and estimated to cost $4.635 million, with the City's cost estimated to be $1.32 million, and the remaining $3.32 million expected to be funded through grants and Ramsey County. This project is Municipal State Aid eligible. The City did not receive state bonding dollars for this project. • The Lake Johanna Boulevard Trail is programmed to start Planning and Design in 2026 with construction anticipated in 3 phases starting in 2029, 2030 and 2031, with an estimated cost of $4.2 million. This project is Municipal State Aid eligible. • The City has been able to self -finance the special assessment portion of the PMP street projects thus far. However, with the cost of these projects increasing, the City should discuss alternative and long-term financing methods for these projects. Some options to the City could include: o Bonding biennially for the special assessment portion of the PMP street projects o Bonding annually for all projects within the PIR fund o A dual approach that increases the property tax levy for smaller projects and utilizes bond financing for the larger infrastructure projects Bonding provides the near -term cash needed to fund projects and reduces the overall impact to the PIR fund through leveled and structured debt service payments. There is a definite need to stay on top of street improvement projects to ensure streets reach their useful lives and don't require costly premature full reconstructions. Several areas of the City are reaching those crucial ages where significant outlay is needed to ensure the long-term vitality of the streets. The 3 types of street improvement projects being considered based on condition are: o Resurfacing is the milling of the top 1.5 to 2 inch surface layer of street pavement and overlaying the street with a new bituminous surface layer. o Full Depth Reclamation involves spot repair of existing curb, milling or reclaiming the full depth of existing bituminous pavement, blending milled material with underlying aggregate material and installing a new bituminous pavement section. o Reconstruction involves removal and replacement of larger quantities of existing curb, installing underlying subgrade correction materials, new aggregate base and a new bituminous pavement section. Projects were programmed to get the City on a schedule of completing a major street reconstruction project every other year. Page 2 of 4 Public Safety Capital Equipment Fund • The fund is currently being used to account for capital expenditures made by the Lake Johanna Fire Department. • Self -Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) replacements are scheduled for 2027, with engine truck replacements scheduled for 2027 and 2031. • A property tax levy of $120,000 is being proposed for 2027 based on future capital needs. Equipment & Building Replacement Fund • The current plan includes recommendations from the comprehensive building reserve study that was completed by Reserve Advisors in May 2025. • The current $100,000 tax levy will not support the needs of this fund. A property tax levy of $163,500 is being proposed for 2027, and the levy may need additional increases over the next couple of years. Utility Funds • Public Works staff continues to evaluate the condition of City utilities throughout the community. The majority of street projects currently include a minimum amount for isolated utility repairs, but these amounts could increase as locations are identified where broader water, sanitary sewer, and drainage replacement is needed. • For the Sewer Fund, no I&I grant funds have been included in the plan as the amounts are unpredictable. • Rate increase assumptions are as follows: ■ Water — 2027 (3%), 2028-2029 (4%), 2030 (3%), 2031 (0%) ■ Sewer — 2027-2031 (0%) ■ Storm — 2027 (5%), 2028-2029 (2%), 2030-2031 (0%) Council Direction Staff is seeking direction from the City Council regarding the following items: 2027 Projects As we review the 2027 projects, does the Council have any questions, comments or concerns about including them during budget preparation? 2027 Property Tax LM The levy for the Equipment/Building Replacement Fund is proposed to increase from $100,000 to $163,500 and the levy for the Public Safety Capital Fund in proposed to decrease from $312,000 to $120,000 in this plan. No levy is proposed for the EDA Fund. What changes, if any, should staff assume? Park Development Fund Park projects are currently being programmed in the PIR Fund. There is approximately $200,000 in the Park Development Fund which can be transferred to the PIR Fund to assist with the funding of park projects. Does the Council want to look at transferring these funds? Page 3 of 4 2027 Rate Increases - Enterprise Funds A rate study was completed in 2018. Annually, staff perform a review to ensure rates are at an appropriate level in order to meet future anticipated expenditures. Rate increase assumptions are proposed in 2027 and in future years in order to maintain a positive fund balance across the three funds. What changes, if any, should staff assume? Local Government Aid (LGA) Arden Hills was certified $24,051 of LGA in 2026. Staff recommends that these funds are not used for general operations (the state has unallotted LGA in the past) but instead direct them toward capital projects. They are included in the PIR Fund in this plan, similar to last year. CIP Franchise Fees Update Included in this budget are franchise fee revenues of $435,000 annually that will be used to offset debt service for the new fire station of approximately $270,000 annually. Excess franchise fees will be approximately $165,000 annually. Where does Council want to direct this excess? Budget Impact The Council should review the estimated fund balances and funding sources with special attention given to the PIR and Equipment/Building Replacement Funds. When considering what tax levy increases are needed to support the capital funds, it should be noted that preliminary results of department submissions and other assumptions have the General Fund expenditures increasing by $1,090,641, which would equate to an overall 16.22% levy increase (which includes the reduction in the capital levy noted above). Attachment C gives a preliminary snapshot of the increases being considered for the General Fund. Attachments Attachment A: PowerPoint Overview of Capital Improvement Plan Attachment B: Capital Improvement Plan Attachment C: Preliminary levy impact and 2027 General Fund Budget Attachment D: Equipment Replacement Guidelines Page 4 of 4 Attachment A ii M O N rs rq O rq C M M N 0 N 00 M O^1 I� Ln 0 N n Ln O 0 O 00IH o 0 0 n Nrq r.j A N N 0 N O00 1.6 Ln U) n 00 M M N c� O 0 N M 0 0 0 0 �' r-I �1 r 00 LA 00 N M 00 N - O I� Ln N N � - 0 O M o 0 M LCT) O 0 O M 0 , 0 0000 al _ o O 0o 00 N O N O O M O O O O Lr) �D Op 00 Cy)�O l0 M O r-I 0000 N CY) O O 0 N 00 M • •• 0 O Lr l0 O M 00 Lr) O Ln _ 0� _ O Cp 00 Ln .�-I N w 01 O N O Ln O O Ln M O O O O O OO O Ln M r-I `M a1 00 nj Ln N r-I CL Q Q) U O c u ��E��E� _ - C= E N > N E Q N Y ifN Q aJ U - CL E 0 N � N N w E N N a--' N i Q U i Ln w E N Lu 4-0 H L C: 0 0 a-J (n C O O a-J M (n E &-- ro -W Q) (n >, (n >_ 4- 2 X E Q 4-j 4-J O O r6 4 Q a--J a--J U � -0 E a--) Q O �-0 �C: U) 4--) 4--, W O �O O L ro ru W ro a V ' Q0�� 00 � N r1 O r-j o 0 - � 0 'n � O o 0 0 0 o Ln N rn N 'n `no(31 00 - O O�� - m N M� N o r-I 00 lN0 00 r-I 0 000 0 0 Ln 0 �o N Ln 00 N N C) R � - _ • O • O r1 _ M r-I N I� 0 r1 K;J- `� O 00 N 9t r-I N 0 O � r-I ('0 r-I 00 O m r-I Lf1 c-I O O 00 I� ri O) fY� r-I 1n O ryj o Ln I� N Nr-I 4-1 a-•+ a--' C O ' v v .C) . u O C u LU ao - m E N > (j Q W4- 0 E Q 0 0 v - a 0 v 0 N E c� Q o U cn >' w ° O � 4-1 Q 0 }' E '- H M ) = 0 m Q f6 V f6 -0 Q N 0-U-0o I -I U c L 0- LL O � .O QO4-J� O N �_ r6 D > O 110 U-) O E r O ra -q- N N �, O O a-J - � o� � -� D L` U) C: % m � V V) L U,i � L O � Q) � � N Q N ^ `4-J -0 O � •0 0 0 -0 Q Q) E E� � L � L (1>) a--i (n i Q) r0 O -0 cn — 4-, > > -- Ul) ul 0) N > O 0 C v N ro �O � ro U u aJ T' � 0 V) D _0 ] M N Z, ra -0 -0 4-J V) i ra V a- J ro — ra N Q N N N N 0 � Q O L a-J X N 4-J Q (n (2) N O N C C E 4 4 C v _ C LL 4+ U a, a OSONOO O O O O OOOSO^00� 00OOOOSS r-1 00 r-I 00 O O 000 Q M Isi n -1 00 m� oco owo n m0 0w0 O n m m N N O lD M m O S n n 0 LLM r-I aOvi l0 � w IIl � N r-I r-I r-I r-I W N r-I LA w r-I 1� r-I r-1 M -1 Ql Rt I� r-I v► v> v> v► r� v► L a� a O 4 - a) C > U C > O 4> QJ _ in +' O E fo O u \ a) >. 4-1 4-1 4-14-1 ai a) a1 a) a) c Y E cn cn cn cn (6 L U U U U ai Q) Q tY tY tY tY tY tY tY tY 3 3 3 Q) Q) tY LU 0_ 0_ 0_ 0_ 0_ 0_ 0_ 0_ 0_ 0_ 0_ 0_ 0_ 0_ 0_ 0_ 0_ 0_ (n (n 0_ 4- U Q 4 a, E Ecu ai u E > ai 0 ai 734-1 > aii v a O o U a.o *ET E � a) u i Q L QJ Q) Q) >- ti 0 cu 4-1CO E L V) C m to + ai ai u 0 3 ro ai 4-1 ai >O O > ro oc in U ai aj ai aj v o co E _ f° 2 O v O L U tXo 4- co D }, C C C a J C 4-1 O m aai E E '� .m -0 On aj a) l0 co O in �c i OC '� E L a_ > 0)CC w E ro co z Vn -0> m a v 6 E ro = O Z U o_ > -0 co -0 E ) m z b 0 0 C o m Y Y w\ u\ u E bn _ _ _ 'n _ UA O_ a] L Q L fo C a) N > C v Q tjo v ai o_ v C O -r3 Q a) E = 0 Q)O U C .O f 6 3 OD m 0 C a N c 76 o C C Q) C 4J Qi L 3 2 a: 2 = a (D w cn Q! +� C � C7 t7 N N N N E a--' Y '� Y N O (D O C7 <7 Ln a O O O 2 Z � H a 2 Ln J u N E E Q Q w O = C E Q m H v_ Q. E Q V1 i O _u +m_+ C i -0C O m _ LU u a a N E m 1Z v Q QJ Q! aL+ L L L 4J a) a) x O Q) O M N Ln c Q) 4, U E C C a) a) m > E C O Q! 4 Q U E F a ai ai a) + a- 0 Ln L C L cu L a, Ln au j O j m E fC Q N Q r LU c� O a m 4+ O H N O N a.+ 4� E CL cr W 0 0 o m m m m a cn O O O -1 T-1 lzt W Lri o ^ Lr M of ai Lri r-I Lr r-I of N r-I R* ip/� Vl- O O O O O O O O O O O - O Lri Lri O O O O rV M N N Ln O O O —1 �q �* -* tD O Lrl f\ L6 Ol Ln Ol Lrl Lr1 Q1 rr)O M r-I V-4 LLn 41 C 41 C Cl)C E E E 0) u U U 12 lC lC Q Q Q of cc uo Lbtao m ca ca 41 v W W E L E E 0-a) CL CL B LL LN B LL B LL N 7 U c» Ln a o a-c 41 y Y U � :tt L a) u m L CA Qi ru O _ a 41 cr ~ 41 u E L ++ to v 4' N C: L T N v M `^ ru V a) N al L i X W m rn (D 0) > g N a N E U c = c N a) E n N a'' Cr LU LL CC U •z 06 m rr � r 4' 4J E N i m CL U s > NJ > 0 H LL CD ■ W ■V E Y/ W OMoo _ N NLn 1.o m Ln .r-r r- o N O r-I m 00 m O I;t 00 r-i Q0 O-1 l0 O 00 _ M N Ln l0 N m m QD r-I N r- QD N 00 N Ln M Ln 00 00 O Lin N O Ql N 00 lM0 fV r- r, N Ol M Ln N Ln N N M r-I M _ f �j M nj 01 N p N l0 I� cr n l0 M r-I d r-r rl- r-I N m M M l0 r-I N N N p p l0 00 l0 00 r-r l0 ::31 M Zt N 00 r� l0 qt Ln r-1 N N zt qt lD m 00 00 O N O p N m O ('0 D LL -0 C -0 LL (3.) > o E LL O _ > E U fB U � C6 -0 cn C6 � ru u LL a) ate-+ �Q f6 U E O O u m a--+ 0= v E C6 V) w Q CT w U cn (n O O O N = O m a--) O �V L :3 o ro ipr O O >1 N V O V C 4j)- O = •V, ,, 'V L O u •� ra ro r A O E -0 C: V E m4o•r� Es c °' E ra i o > 0- •� . U u U �O Q s .� J 6 � D O 0 O x w a z w a � LL L W Attachment B �`N2ELN HILLS 2027-2031 Proposed CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN CITY OF ARDEN HILLS Council Work Session July 27, 2026 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Department Summary Capital Improvement Plan by Department Capital Improvement Project Detail Sheets Projects by Funding Source Sources and Uses of Funds Page 1 2 5 80 85 Department 2027 through 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Department Summary 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Parks Department 7,676,175 818,255 8,846,695 2,760,705 1,318,755 21,420,585 Water Department 1,450,000 300,000 46,750 850,000 14,000 2,660,750 Sanitary Sewer Department 795,000 703,000 39,000 325,000 1,862,000 Equipment 534,135 691,245 490,820 288,200 480,751 2,485,151 Public Safety 502,090 203,999 20,371 112,175 227,932 1,066,567 Economic Development Street Department Government Buildings 180,000 130,000 100,000 6,425,000 15,495 124,849 5,355,000 310,000 11,880,000 59,781 516,847 716,972 GRAND TOTAL 1125zm 8,693348 10,107,636 9,464,861 2033285 4Z40Z025 2027 through 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Projects By Department Department Project # Priority 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Economic Development Gateway Signs 25-EDA-001 180,000 130,000 310,000 Economic Development Total 180,000 130,000 0 0 0 310,000 Equipment _ Replace 1993 Case 621 Loader 25-Eqp-001 300,000 300,000 #103 Replace 2009 Sterling Acterra Truck #431 27-EgpV-001 3 159,135 159,135 Emergency Generator 27-Eqp-004 2 75,000 125,000 125,000 325,000 Replacement Schedule Replace 2017 Mack Plow/Wing/ Dump Truck #123 28-EgpV-001 5 154,500 207,700 362,200 Replace 2015 Ford F-450 Plow/ Dump Truck #320 27-EgpV-003 2 146,000 146,000 Replace 2011 Bobcat E50 Compact Excavator#85214 28-Eqp-005 2 130,000 130,000 Replace 2016 F-350 Pickup w/ Liftgate #455 27-EgpV-002 4 84,975 84,975 Replace 2013 Ford Escape #504 26-EgpV-003 41,500 41,500 Replace Bobcat Snowblower 84" 28-Eqp-001 3 9,270 9,270 #118 Replace 2016 Stepp Asphalt Patch Trailer #121 28-Eqp-004 3 95,000 95,000 Replace 2023 Bobcat Toolcat 29-Eqp-004 2 80,000 80,000 #85478 Replace 2012 Workman #445 29-Eqp-003 3 37,050 37,050 Replace 1998 Tow Behind Air 28-Eqp-003 3 36,050 36,050 Compressor #107 Replace 2019 Bobcat Miller/Planer #129 29-Eqp-002 3 16,480 16,480 Replace 2009 Husqavarna 28-Eqp-002 3 10,300 10,300 Pavement Saw #113 Replace Snowblower 72" #468 29-Eqp-001 4 8,240 8,240 Replace 2025 Bobcat Toolcat 30-Eqp-004 3 80,000 80,000 #85484 Replace 2 Toro Zero Turn Mowers Asset 85485, 85486 30-Eqp-005 3 42,000 42,000 Replace 2016 Workman #456 30-Eqp-002 3 36,050 36,050 Replace Hotsy Pressure Washer #470 30-Eqp-001 4 5,150 5,150 Replace 2020 Bobcat Toolcat #461 25-Eqp-004 2 82,400 82,400 Replace 2018 Bobcat Skid Steer #85460 31-Eqp-002 3 80,000 80,000 Replace 2019 Ford F350 Crew Cab 29-EgpV-002 4 78,000 78,000 w/Tommygate #85323 Trade in Program Toro Z Mowers #473 & #474 25-Eqo-001 3 47,741 47,741 Replace 2019 Ford F-150 Ext Cab 28-EgpV-002 3 46,350 46,350 #601 Replace 2019 Ford F-150 #602 29-EgpV-001 3 46,350 46,350 Replace 2020 Ford F-150 #603 31-EgpV-002 3 46,350 46,350 Replace 2018 Ford Escape #85505 31-EgpV-001 41,200 41,200 Reolare 2016 Trailer Tilt Deck for Department Project # Priority 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Eauipment Total 534,135 691,245 490,820 288,200 480,751 2,485,151 Government Buildinas City Hall Security System 27-BLDG-003 4 15,495 15,495 City Hall Elevator 27-BLDG-001 4 103,507 103,507 City Hall Furnishings 27-BLDG-002 4 21,342 21,342 Air Handler/HVAC Maintenance 29-BLDG-001 5 59,781 59,781 City Hall Roof 30-BLDG-001 3 410,278 410,278 City Hall Entrance Canopy & 30 BLDG 002 4 106,569 106,569 Masonry Replacements Concrete Flatwork, Partial 30-BLDG-003 5 0 0 Government Buildings Total 15,495 124,849 0 59,781 516,847 716,972 Parks Department Old Hwy 10 Trail - 96 to Valentine 27-Park-003 4,635,000 4,635,000 Park *2027 - Perry Park Improvement 27-Park-002 3 686,500 686,500 Project *2027 - Ingerson Park 27-PARK-004 3 550,500 550,500 Improvement Project Snelling Ave N. & Royal Hills Trail 26-Park-009 2 472,500 472,500 Improvements *2027 - Sampson Park 27-PARK-003 3 442,200 442,200 Improvement Project Hamline Avenue N Trail 26-Park-001 3 220,000 220,000 Connection Improvement Natural Resources Restoration 26-PARK-022 3 189,750 359,930 300,070 260,705 280,955 1,391,410 Lake Johanna Blvd Trail 28-Park-001 3 175,000 250,000 1,400,000 1,500,000 750,000 4,075,000 *Trail and Walkway Rehabilitation 26-PARK-020 3 100,000 700,000 800,000 Hazelnut Park Parking Lot 25-Park-004 4 100,000 100,000 Improvements *Park Shelter and Building 26-PARK-017 3 85,000 93,000 178,000 Renewal *Park Planning & Design Concepts 25-Park-007 2 10,500 11,000 11,500 12,000 12,500 57,500 GRG Floral Park NRMB 26-Park-006 5,225 5,225 5,225 15,675 GRG Hazelnut & Chatham NRMB 26-Park-007 4,000 4,000 *Athletic Court / Hardcourt 26-PARK-010 3 184,000 156,500 340,500 Rehabilitation *Park Furnishings Replacements 26-PARK-014 3 8,100 8,900 16,200 33,200 County Road Trail Projects 28-Park-002 2 6,350,000 6,350,000 *Playground Replacement 26-PARK-019 3 471,250 471,250 *Park Pavement Rehabilitation 26-PARK-016 3 50,250 50,250 *Hockey Rink Improvements 26-PARK-012 3 288,000 255,000 543,000 *Park Signage Replacement 26-PARK-018 3 4,100 4,100 Parks Department Total 7,676,175 818,255 8,846,695 2,760,705 1,318,755 21,420,585 Public Safety LJFD General Equipment 26-Pub-003 239,893 15,755 20,371 2,366 2,490 280,875 LJFD Engine/Ladder Replacement 27-Pub-001 153,135 189,088 342,223 LJFD Station Capital 26-Pub-004 79,182 74,700 0 0 0 153,882 LJFD Rescue/Command/Utility 27-Pub-002 29,880 113,544 109,809 36,354 289,587 Vehicle Replacement Public Safety Total 502,090 203,999 20,371 112,175 227,932 1,066,567 Sanitary Sewer Department Sewer Lining/Rehabilitation 26-Sew-001 2 660,000 460,000 325,000 1,445,000 Lift Station Rehabilitation 26-Sew-002 2 135,000 243,000 39,000 417,000 Sanitary Sewer Department Total 795,000 0 703,000 39,000 325,000 1,862,000 Department Project # Priority 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Street Department County Rd D Improvements - 27-Str-002 3 100,000 100,000 Ramsey County project 2028 PMP 28-Str-001 2 6,425,000 6,425,000 2030 PMP 30-Str-001 2 5,355,000 5,355,000 Street Department Total 100,000 6A25,000 0 5,355,000 0 11,880,000 Water Department Water Meter Replacement 26-W-006 3 900,000 900,000 Water Tower Maintenance 26-W-004 2 375,000 14,000 389,000 Booster Station Improvements 27-W-001 2 175,000 175,000 (1230 Red Fox Rd) Meter Vault Improvements 28-W-002 2 300,000 320,000 620,000 Water System Model Update 26-W-007 3 46,750 46,750 Lake Johanna Blvd Watermain 26-W-002 3 530,000 530,000 Assessment Wa—ter Department Total 1,450,000 300,000 46,750 850,000 14,000 2,660,750 GRAND TOTAL 1125ZM 8,693,348 1Q107,636 9,464.861 2AS3285 42,402,025 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 25-EDA-001 Project Name Gateway Signs Total Project Cost $310,000 Department Economic Development Type Improvement Category Economic Devl Improvement Priority n/a Status Active TCAAP No Description Install gateway signs at major entry points to the City. Potential locations for signs include: (1) Highway 96 at Round Lake Road, (2) Highway 96 at Lexington Avenue, (3) Lake Valentine Road at 35W, (4) County Road E at Lexington Avenue, (5) Lexington Avenue at County Road F, (6) Lexington Avenue at County Road D, and (7) County Road E at Highway 51. Potential sign locations are not listed in order of priority and are subject to change. There are three existing gateway signs in the following locations: (1) County Road E2 at I-35W, (2) County Road D at Cleveland Avenue, and (3) Lake Johanna Boulevard at the Roseville border. Staffhas budgeted for the completion of an additional gateway sign in 2027 at a location to be determined. justification Advance the economic development goals in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Implement the Guiding Plan for the B2 District. Work to better identify the entrance points to the City for businesses and visitors. Foster civic pride and community identity. Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Construction/Maintenance 180,000 130,000 0 0 0 310,000 Total 180,000 Funding Sources 2027 130,000 2028 0 2029 0 2030 0 2031 310,000 Total EDA General Fund 180,000 130,000 0 0 0 310,000 Total 180,000 130,000 0 0 0 310,000 Budget Impact Annual maintenance costs for sign cleaning and care of landscaping is estimated by the Public Works Department at $500 per sign annually. 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 25-Eqp-001 Project Name Replace 1993 Case 621 Loader #103 Total Project Cost $300,000 Department Equipment Type Equipment Category Vehicles Priority n/a Status Active Useful Life 20 years TCAAP No Description Vehicle #103 - 1993 Case 621 Loader & Plow Total Hours 3,683 Hour gauge: 2018 - 3,073; 2019 - 3,344; 2020 - Not available; 2021 - 3,438; 2022 - 3,50;1 2023 - Not available; 2024 - 3,630; 2025 - Current 3,772 New Loader estimate - $225,000 Frontwing /Plow - $75,000 justification Vehicle will be 34 years old. This piece of equipment is used year round for loading trucks, stock pile management, and is a backup to our snow plow fleet. Also, during emergencies, it is used for clearing trees to open roadways and access utilities. Due to its age, this loader is showing deterioration and some significant corrosion. Replacement parts are hard to find and equipment is at end of life for wiring, hoses, and hydraulic seals. Downtime is increasing with constantly repairing fluid leaks from old lines and broken fittings. Staff recommends replacement in 2026. Fleet CEP Points Replacement Guidelines Rating is 63.5 (Needs immediate consideration) Parts and labor costs: Total PM Repairs 2019 - $1,652 2020 - $2,361 2021 - $5,150; $1,070; $4,080 2022 - $2,220; $2,220; $0 2023 - $0 2024 - $3,766; $0 $3,766 (2 weeks of total downtime) 2025- $2,745 $625 $2,120 (2 weeks of total downtime) 2026 (April) Duties for Loader: Snow plowing, Wing back banks, Bucket snow in cul-da-sacs, PW shop materials handling, Storm damage management, Tree debris management at the Old Shop property,Stuck equipment recovery. Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Equip/Vehicles/Furnishings 300,000 0 0 0 0 300,000 Total 300,000 0 0 0 0 300,000 Funding Sources 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Equipment/Building Replacement 275,000 0 0 0 0 275,000 Fund Trade -In Value 25,000 0 0 0 0 25,000 Total 300,000 0 0 0 0 300,000 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 27-EgpV-001 Project Name Replace 2009 Sterling Acterra Truck #431 Total Project Cost $303,635 Department Equipment Type Equipment Category Vehicles Priority 3Important Status Active Useful Life 10 years TCAAP No Description Replace 2009 1,500 gallon tanker truck used for watering, sweeping, dust control and rink flooding. Mileage 27,400 ** This equipment was ordered by Council approval on xx, 2025. **Delivery of chassis will be received in 2026; Buildout invoices will occur in 2027. justification Current vehicle will be 18 years old in 2027. Corrosion due to winter operations and availability of parts. Fleet CEP Points Replacement Guidelines Rating is 31.75 (Needs immediate consideration) Parts and labor costs: 2018 - $2,112 2019 - $2,618 2020 - $3,303 2021 - $2,060 2022 - $5,613 - PM: $600; Repairs $5,013 2023 - $ 323 - PM: $323; Repairs $0 2024 - TBD Duties: Watering trees/gardens Filling garden barrels Assisting with sewer cleaning operations Pressure washing water source Rink flooding Assist with street sweeping Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Equip/Vehicles/Furnishings 159,135 0 0 0 0 159,135 Total 159,135 0 0 0 0 159,135 Funding Sources 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Equipment/Building Replacement 139,135 0 0 0 0 139,135 Fund Trade -In Value 20,000 0 0 0 0 20,000 Total 159,135 0 0 0 0 159,135 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 27-Eqp-004 Project Name Emergency Generator Replacement Schedule Total Project Cost $325,000 Department Equipment Type Equipment Category Equipment: Public Works Priority 2 Very Important Status Active Useful Life 20years TCAAP No Description The water department, sewer department, and city hall standby power (EOC) utilizes a total of 4 standby generators ranging in model years (1999-2005). This equipment is in need of a replacement schedule. Estimated auction return is $5,000 each. justification Due to the emergency needs, factors like outdated technology, parts availability, dependability, and repair costs are taken into account with the replacement plan. Additionally, stationary mount natural gas fueled generators are much more efficient and do not suffer from the reliability issues seen with diesel fueled units. PW plans to replace generators on a priority basis. Analysis of emergency operations is being completed in 2026 for strategic planning/ generator replacements. 2025- $$6,530 for preventative maintenance.. (4 units) Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total EquipNehicles/Furnishings 75,000 125,000 0 125,000 0 325,000 Total 75,000 125,000 0 125,000 0 325,000 Funding Sources 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Sanitary Sewer Utility Fund 70,000 0 0 60,000 0 130,000 Water Utility Funds 0 120,000 0 0 0 120,000 Equipment/Building Replacement 0 0 0 60,000 0 60,000 Fund Trade -In Value 5,000 5,000 0 5,000 0 15,000 Total 75,000 125,000 0 125,000 0 325,000 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 28-EgpV-001 Project Name Replace 2017 Mack Plow/Wing/Dump Truck #123 Total Project Cost $362,200 Type Equipment Priority 5 Future Consideration Useful Life 10 years Description Vehicle #123 - 2017 Mack Single Axle Plow Wing Dump Truck (streets) Mileage 19,318 Hours 1873 Department Equipment Category Vehicles Status Active TCAAP No justification Due to long lead times for specifying, ordering and taking delivery, staff recommends ordering the plow truck chassis in 2027 and doing the build out in 2028. This will provide time to take delivery of a finished truck by 2029, making the current one 12 years old. Fleet CEP Points Replacement Guidelines Rating is 19.8 (Good condition) Repair costs for parts and labor: Total PM Repair 2019 - $3,206; 2020 - $4,557; 2021 - $9,092; 2022 - $8,443; 2023 - $7,394; 2024 - $5,022; $1,022; $4,000 2025 - $2,362; $462; $1,900 2026 TBD Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Equip/Vehicles/Furnishings 0 154,500 207,700 0 0 362,200 Total 0 154,500 207,700 0 0 362,200 Funding Sources 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Equipment/Building Replacement 0 154,500 172,700 0 0 327,200 Fund Trade -In Value 0 0 35,000 0 0 35,000 Total 0 154,500 207,700 Budget Impact Reduce repair and maintenance costs and improve reliability of our primary snow removal equipment. 0 0 362,200 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 27-EgpV-003 Project Name Replace 2015 Ford F-450 Plow/Dump Truck #320 Total Project Cost $146,000 Department Equipment Type Equipment Category Vehicles Priority 2 Very Important Status Active Useful Life 10 years TCAAP No Description Replace 2015 Ford F-450 Plow/ Dump Truck. This replacement would include plow, dump body and salt spreader with related controls. Mileage: 36,241 Hours 3494 Estimated auction return $25,000 justification This truck is a primarily used year round for street route snow plowing, park maintenance, surface water repairs, and miscellaneous utility projects. A 12 year replacement cycle is recommended for reliability and maximizing return on investment. Fleet CEP Points Replacement Guidelines Rating is 28.5 (Needs immediate consideration) Repair costs through 2019-2023 total - $9,850 PM Repairs 2024 - $1,327; $695; $632; 2025; $470 $2,182; 2026 TBD Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total EquipNehicles/Furnishings 0 146,000 0 0 0 146,000 Total 0 146,000 0 0 0 146,000 Funding Sources 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Equipment/Building Replacement 0 120,000 0 0 0 120,000 Fund Trade -In Value 0 26,000 0 0 0 26,000 Total 0 146,000 0 0 0 146,000 Budget Impact Reduced repair and maintenance costs. 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 28-Eqp-005 Project Name Replace 2011 Bobcat E50 Compact Excavator #85214 Total Project Cost $130,000 Contact Public Works Director Department Equipment Type Equipment Category Equipment: Public Works Priority 2 Very Important Status Active Useful Life 15 years TCAAP No Description The compact excavator is used within all departments of PW but primarily used in surface water. Excavation of small structures for maintenance and repair. Current hours-1200 justification The need for a longer boom reach and larger lifting capacity has been found. The compact excavator has taken the place of the 2000 Case backhoe for our current PW operations. Staff recommends replacement of the existing compact excavator with a slightly larger model. This new excavator would replace our current 2000 Case backhoe and the 2011 Bobcat compact excavator. Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Unassigned Expenditure 0 130,000 0 0 0 130,000 Total 0 130,000 0 0 0 130,000 Funding Sources 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Equipment/Building Replacement 0 105,000 0 0 0 105,000 Fund Trade -In Value 0 25,000 0 0 0 25,000 Total 0 130,000 0 0 0 130,000 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 27-EgpV-002 Project Name Replace 2016 F-350 Pickup w/Liftgate #455 Total Project Cost $84,975 Type Equipment Priority 4 Less Important Useful Life 10 years Description Vehicle #455 - 2016 Ford F-350 Crew Cab with Liftgate (parks). VIN # 3955 Current Mileage: 64,300 Hours- 5,978 Department Equipment Category Vehicles Status Active TCAAP No justification The crew cab truck is used year round for efficiency with more staff seating. Seasonal staff can utilize one truck for up to 4 people. Due to rising repair costs, the recommendation is to replace at 10 years. Fleet CEP Points Replacement Guidelines Rating is 23.1 (Qualifies for replacement) Parts and labor costs: 2019 - $ 965; 2020 - $ 486; 2021 - $1,200; 2022 - $1,408; 2023 - $ 435; 2024-$4,865; $721; $4,144 2025 - $45 pm Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Equip/Vehicles/Furnishings 0 84,975 0 0 0 84,975 Total 0 84,975 0 0 0 84,975 Funding Sources 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Equipment/Building Replacement Fund 0 74,975 0 0 0 74,975 Trade -In Value 0 10,000 0 0 0 10,000 Total 0 84,975 0 0 0 84,975 Budget Impact Reduce maintenance and repair costs 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 26-EgpV-003 Project Name Replace 2013 Ford Escape #504 Total Project Cost $41,500 Department Equipment Type Equipment Category Vehicles Priority n/a Status Active Useful Life 10 years TCAAP No Description Replace 2013 Ford Escape. Current Mileage (April 2026): 70,200 justification The current vehicle will be 13 years old and there is corrosion on the undercarriage. A multipurpose vehicle, like an Escape, will serve other City employees when they want to use a City vehicle to attend meetings and conferences - especially when they are out of town. Fleet CEP Points Replacement Guidelines Rating is 29.7 (Needs immediate consideration) Preventative maintenance and repair costs: 2018 - $ 429 2019 - $1,205 2020 - $ 0 2021 - $ 530 2022 - $ 48 PM; $0 Repairs 2023 - $ 85 PM; $0 Repairs 2024 - $ 680 PM; $390 Repairs 2025 - $40 PM; $845 Repairs 2026- $0 Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Equip/Vehicles/Furnishings 0 41,500 0 0 0 41,500 Total 0 41,500 0 0 0 41,500 Funding Sources 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Equipment/Building Replacement 0 33,500 0 0 0 33,500 Fund Trade -In Value 0 8,000 0 0 0 8,000 Total Budget Impact Cost of maintenance. 0 41,500 0 0 0 41,500 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 28-Eqp-001 Project Name Replace Bobcat Snowblower 84" #118 Total Project Cost $9,270 Department Equipment Type Equipment Category Equipment: Public Works Priority 3Important Status Active Useful Life 10 years TCAAP No Description Replacement of a Bobcat Snowblower attachment used for snow removal along sidewalks, trails, parking lots, and miscellaneous snow removal needs. Estimated auction return - $2,000 justification The attachment will be at the end of its useful life in 2028. Fleet CEP Points Replacement Guidelines Rating is 21 (Good condition) 2019- 2023 repairs costs- $328 2024 - $0 2025 - $0 2026 - TBD Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Equip/Vehicles/Furnishings 0 9,270 0 0 0 9,270 Total 0 9,270 0 0 0 9,270 Funding Sources 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Equipment/Building Replacement 0 7,270 0 0 0 7,270 Fund Trade -In Value 0 2,000 0 0 0 2,000 Total 0 9,270 0 0 0 9,270 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 28-Eqp-004 Project Name Replace 2016 Stepp Asphalt Patch Trailer #121 Total Project Cost $95,000 Department Equipment Type Equipment Category Equipment: Public Works Priority 3Important Status Active Useful Life 10 years TCAAP No Description Replace 2016 Stepp Asphalt Patch Trailer. Estimated auction return - $25,000 justification The patch trailer is used for street maintenance operations. This equipment will be 12 years old in 2028, near the end of its useful life and also with a relatively high auction return. Fleet CEP Points Replacement Guidelines Rating is 22 (Good condition) Preventative maintenance and repair costs: Repair costs between 2019- 2022- $4,665 PM Repairs 2023 - $554 $150 2024 - $45 $0 2025-115 $0 2026 - TBD Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total EquipNehicles/Furnishings 0 0 95,000 0 0 95,000 Total 0 0 95,000 0 0 95,000 Funding Sources 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Equipment/Building Replacement 0 0 70,000 0 0 70,000 Fund Trade -In Value 0 0 25,000 0 0 25,000 Total 0 0 95,000 0 0 95,000 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 29-Eqp-004 Project Name Replace 2023 Bobcat Toolcat #85478 Total Project Cost $80,000 Department Equipment Type Equipment Category Equipment: Public Works Priority 2 Very Important Status Active Useful Life 5 years TCAAP No Description The Toolcat's are used across all departments and serve as primary sidewalk and trail snow removal equipment. Current Hours 443 justification Fleet CEP Points Replacement Guidelines Rating is 15 (Excellent condition) Preventative maintenance and repair costs: PM; Repairs; 2024-$251; $1,930 2025 - $95 $64 2026 - TBD Expenditures EquipNehicles/Furnishings Total Funding Sources Equipment/Building Replacement Fund 2027 2028 0 2029 2030 2031 0 80,000 0 0 80,000 0 80,000 0 0 80,000 Total 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total 0 0 50,000 0 0 50,000 Trade -In Value 0 0 30,000 0 0 30,000 Total 0 0 80,000 0 0 80,000 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 29-Eqp-003 Project Name Replace 2012 Workman #445 Total Project Cost $37,050 Department Type Equipment Category Priority 3Important Status Useful Life 13 years TCAAP Description Current Hours : 935 justification Fleet CEP Points Replacement Guidelines Rating is 26 (Qualifies for replacement) Preventative maintenance and repair costs: PM; Repairs; 2023 - $45; $0; 2024 - $60; $540; 2025 - $128 $324 2026 - TBD Equipment Equipment: Public Works Active No Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total EquipNehicles/Furnishings 0 0 37,050 0 0 37,050 Total 0 0 37,050 0 0 37,050 Funding Sources 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Equipment/Building Replacement 0 0 35,550 0 0 35,550 Fund Trade -In Value 0 0 1,500 0 0 1,500 Total 0 0 37,050 0 0 37,050 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 28-Eqp-003 Project Name Replace 1998 Tow Behind Air Compressor #107 Total Project Cost $36,050 Department Equipment Type Equipment Category Equipment: Public Works Priority 3Important Status Active Useful Life 30 years TCAAP No Description Replace 1998 LeRoi tow behind Air Compressor. Replacement parts becoming obsolete. Hours 593 Estimated auction return - $1,500 justification This piece of equipment is used for street and irrigation maintenance. In 2028, this equipment will be 30 years old and past its useful life. Fleet CEP Points Replacement Rating is 41 (Needs immediate consideration) Repair costs between 2019- 2022- $1,250 2023 - $190 PM 2024 - $292 PM 2025 - $384 Repair 2026 TBD Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total EquipNehicles/Furnishings 0 0 36,050 0 0 36,050 Total 0 0 36,050 0 0 36,050 Funding Sources 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Equipment/Building Replacement Fund 0 0 34,550 0 0 34,550 Trade -In Value 0 0 1,500 0 0 1,500 Total 0 0 36,050 0 0 36,050 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 29-Eqp-002 Project Name Replace 2019 Bobcat Miller/Planer #129 Total Project Cost $16,480 Department Type Equipment Category Priority 3Important Status TCAAP No Description This attachment is used for street patching operations. justification Fleet CEP Points Replacement Guidelines Rating is 18 (Excellent condition) Preventative maintenance and repair costs: PM Repair 2023 - $60; $0; 2024- $150; $0; 2025 - $80 $245 2026 - TBD Equipment Equipment: Public Works Active Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total EquipNehicles/Furnishings 0 0 16,480 0 0 16,480 Tota 1 0 0 16,480 0 0 16,480 Funding Sources 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Equipment/Building Replacement 0 0 16,480 0 0 16,480 Fund Tota 1 0 0 16,480 0 0 16,480 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 28-Eqp-002 Project Name Replace 2009 Husqavarna Pavement Saw #113 Total Project Cost $10,300 Department Equipment Category Equipment: Public Works Status Active TCAAP No Description Replace walk behind pavement saw. Hours -111 Estimated auction return - $2,500 Contact Public Works Director Type Equipment Priority 3Important Useful Life 15 years justification This saw is used to cut asphalt and concrete for street patching and concrete repairs. In 2028, this equipment will be 19 years old and past its useful life. Fleet CEP Points Replacement Guidelines Rating is 23.6 (Qualifies for replacement) Repair costs between 2019- 2023- $1,300 2024 - $0 2025 - $80 2026 - TBD Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Equip/Vehicles/Furnishings 0 0 10,300 0 0 10,300 Total 0 0 10,300 0 0 10,300 Funding Sources 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Equipment/Building Replacement 0 0 7,800 0 0 7,800 Fund Trade -In Value 0 0 2,500 0 0 2,500 Total 0 0 10,300 0 0 10,300 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 29-Eqp-001 Project Name Replace Snowblower 72" #468 Total Project Cost $8,240 Department Equipment Type Equipment Category Equipment: Public Works Priority 4 Less Important Status Active Useful Life 10 years TCAAP No justification This snowblower attachment is used in the parks department for ice rink clearing and other misc. parks needs. Fleet CEP Points Replacement Guidelines Rating is 13 (Excellent condition) Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total EquipNehicles/Furnishings 0 0 8,240 0 0 8,240 Total 0 0 8,240 0 0 8,240 Funding Sources 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Equipment/Building Replacement 0 0 8,240 0 0 8,240 Fund Total 0 0 8,240 0 0 8,240 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 30-Eqp-004 Project Name Replace 2025 Bobcat Toolcat #85484 Total Project Cost $80,000 Contact Public Works Director Department Equipment Type Equipment Category Equipment: Public Works Priority 3 Important Status Active Useful Life 5 years TCAAP No Description The toolcat is used throughout all division of PW. One primary use is snow removal from trails and sidewalks citywide. Asset 85484 Current Hours 152 justification The 5-7 year replacement cycle is what PW has programmed historically for replacement of our Toolcats. This is due to higher resale value and corrosion factors that lead to increased repairs and downtime. Fleet CEP Points Replacement Guidelines Rating is 14.6 (excellent) PM Repairs 2025 - $256 $0 2026 - TBD Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Unassigned Expenditure 0 0 0 80,000 0 80,000 Total 0 0 0 80,000 0 80,000 Funding Sources 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Equipment/Building Replacement 0 0 0 50,000 0 50,000 Fund Trade -In Value 0 0 0 30,000 0 30,000 Total 0 0 0 80,000 0 80,000 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 30-Eqp-005 Project Name Replace 2 Toro Zero Turn Mowers Asset 85485, 85486 Total Project Cost $42,000 Contact Public Works Director Department Equipment Type Equipment Category Park Capital Equipment Priority 3 Important Status Active Useful Life 5 years TCAAP No Description The zero turn mowers are used to mow city property, boulevards/ medians, and is primarily used in the parks Spring, Summer, and Fall. justification Historically PW has recommended replacing our two zero turn mowers every 3 years due to resale and a manufacturers warranty for 3 years. The machines that were purchased in 2025 now come with a 5 year warranty. PW now recommends replacement of the machines in 5 years for this cycle and evaluate in 2030 whether to continue recommending a 5 year replacement cycle. Asset85486- PM Repairs 2025- $234 $0 2026- TBD Asset 85485 PM Repairs 2025 - $256 $28 2026 - TBD Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Unassigned Expenditure 0 0 0 42,000 0 42,000 Total 0 0 0 42,000 0 42,000 Funding Sources 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Equipment/Building Replacement 0 0 0 28,000 0 28,000 Fund Trade -In Value 0 0 0 14,000 0 14,000 Total 0 0 0 42,000 0 42,000 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 30-Eqp-002 Project Name Replace 2016 Workman #456 Total Project Cost $36,050 Department Equipment Type Equipment Category Equipment: Public Works Priority 3Important Status Active Useful Life 13 years TCAAP No justification Fleet CEP Points Replacement Guidelines Rating is 15.5 (Excellent condition) Preventative maintenance and repair costs: PM; Repairs; 2023 - $25; $0; 2024 - $40; $0; 2025 - $40 $60 2026 - TBD Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total EquipNehicles/Furnishings 0 0 0 36,050 0 36,050 Total 0 0 0 36,050 0 36,050 Funding Sources 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Equipment/Building Replacement 0 0 0 36,050 0 36,050 Fund Total 0 0 0 36,050 0 36,050 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 30-Eqp-001 Project Name Replace Hotsy Pressure Washer #470 Total Project Cost $5,150 Department Equipment Type Equipment Category Equipment: Public Works Priority 4 Less Important Status Active TCAAP No Description The portable hot water Hotsy pressure washer is used across most departments with the primary use in the parks, equipment cleaning, and vandalism removal. justification Fleet CEP Points Replacement Guidelines Rating is 17.5 (Excellent condition) Preventative maintenance and repair costs: PM Repairs 2025 - $24 $0 2026-TBD Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total EquipNehicles/Furnishings 0 0 0 5,150 0 5,150 Total 0 0 0 5,150 0 5,150 Funding Sources 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Equipment/Building Replacement 0 0 0 5,150 0 5,150 Fund Total 0 0 0 5,150 0 5,150 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 25-Eqp-004 Project Name Replace 2020 Bobcat Toolcat #461 Total Project Cost $162,400 Department Equipment Type Equipment Category Equipment: Public Works Priority 2 Very Important Status Active Useful Life 5 years TCAAP No Description Replace 2020 Bobcat Toolcat #461. Hours 705 Estimated auction return $25,000 Equipment may need to be replaced in 6 years. Parts & Labor Costs: PM Repairs 2023 - $1,725 $1,123 $602 2024 - $2,030 $190 $1,840 justification PW currently owns 2 Toolcat's and the primary purpose is snow removal along sidewalks and park trails. During the winter months, the machines are cleaned but salt and the heavy load out on the machine equates to costly repairs and down time. The machine is also used in the summer months on a weekly basis. Equipment repair costs from 2020-2024 total - $6,934 Toolcat Duties: Daily rink cleaning/snow removal Snow removal sidewalks/trails citywide Push back snow banks Trail sweeping Fertilizing Weed management/spraying Tree removal operations PW shop material handling Street maintenance/paving Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total EquipNehicles/Furnishings 0 0 0 0 82,400 82,400 Total Funding Sources Equipment/Building Replacement Fund Trade -In Value Total Budget Impact Time efficiency resulting in labor savings. 0 0 0 0 82,400 82,400 2027 0 0 0 2028 0 2029 0 2030 0 2031 57,400 Total 57,400 0 0 0 25,000 25,000 0 0 0 82,400 82,400 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project# 31-Eqp-002 Project Name Replace 2018 Bobcat Skid Steer #85460 Total Project Cost $80,000 Department Equipment Category Equipment: Public Works Status Active TCAAP No Description Replace the 2018 Bobcat skid steer Current hours 732 Contact Public Works Director Type Equipment Priority 3Important Useful Life 12 years Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Unassigned Expenditure 0 0 0 0 80,000 80,000 Total Funding Sources 0 2027 0 2028 0 2029 0 2030 80,000 2031 80,000 Total Equipment/Building Replacement Fund 0 0 0 0 70,000 70,000 Trade -In Value 0 0 0 0 10,000 10,000 Total 0 0 0 0 80,000 80,000 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 29-EgpV-002 Project Name Replace 2019 Ford F350 Crew Cab w/Tommygate #85323 Total Project Cost $78,000 Department Equipment Type Equipment Category Vehicles Priority 4 Less Important Status Active Useful Life 10 years TCAAP No Description This truck is uses across all PW departments and trailer towing. Current miles: 49,600 Asset 85323 justification Fleet CEP Points Replacement Guidelines Rating is 19 Preventative maintenance and repair costs: PM; Repairs; 2023 - $101; $0 2024 - $90; $0 2025 - $90 $398 2026 - TBD $3,495 Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total EquipNehicles/Furnishings 0 0 0 0 78,000 78,000 Total 0 0 0 0 78,000 78,000 Funding Sources 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Equipment/Building Replacement Fund 0 0 0 0 63,000 63,000 Trade -In Value 0 0 0 0 15,000 15,000 Total 0 0 0 0 78,000 78,000 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 25-Eqo-001 Project Name Trade in Program Toro Z Mowers #473 & #474 Total Project Cost $144,914 Department Equipment Type Equipment Category Equipment: Public Works Priority 3Important Status Active Useful Life 5 years TCAAP No Description Replace Two 2021 Toro "Z" Lawn Mowers #473 & #474 (parks). #473 - 507 hours #474 - 482 hours These were last replaced in January 2022. Cost of 2 machines: $40,930 Trade in values:-$15,000 Net cost of 2 machines: $25,930 Parts and labor costs: #473 PM Repairs 2022 - $312.72 $115 $197.72 2023 - $1,230.12 $67 $1,163.12 2024 - $1,114 $197 $917 #474 PM Repairs 2022 - $182 $115 $67 2023 - $649.68 $67 $582.68 2024 - $1,651 $197 $1,454 justification The trade in value of the Toro "Z" mowers is maximized if they are traded in with warranty still remaining. Due to the amount of time these pieces of equipment are used during the summer months, they are traded in on a five-year cycle. Major repair costs are under factory warranty. Note: The new models will have a 5-year / 1,500 hour warranty. Expenditures EquipNehicles/Furnishings Total Funding Sources Equipment/Building Replacement Fund Trade -In Value Total 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total 0 0 0 0 47,741 47,741 0 0 0 0 47,741 47,741 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total 0 0 0 0 32,741 32,741 0 0 0 0 15,000 15,000 0 0 0 0 47,741 47,741 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 28-EgpV-002 Project Name Replace 2019 Ford F-150 Ext Cab #601 Total Project Cost $46,350 Department Equipment Type Equipment Category Vehicles Priority 3Important Status Active Useful Life 8 years TCAAP No Description Replace 2019 F-150 Extended Cab 4x4 Pickup. Mileage 41,700 Hours 3891 Estimated auction return - $15,000 justification The truck is used for miscellaneous use across departments within Public Works. In 2028, the truck will be 9 years old and at its useful life expected. The new replacement for asset 601 would cycle to the Superintendent, and asset 602 would cycle for PW crew use. Fleet CEP Points Replacement Guidelines Rating is 15.8 (Excellent condition) Repair costs between 2019- 2022- $2,576 Total PM Repair 2023: $129; $129; $0; 2024: $1,120; $873; $247; 2025 $82; $0; 2026 TBD Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total EquipNehicles/Furnishings 0 0 0 0 46,350 46,350 Total Funding Sources Equipment/Building Replacement Fund Trade -In Value Total 0 0 0 0 2027 2028 2029 2030 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 46,350 46,350 2031 31,350 Total 31,350 15,000 15,000 46,350 46,350 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 29-EgpV-001 Project Name Replace 2019 Ford F-150 #602 Total Project Cost $46,350 Department Equipment Type Equipment Category Vehicles Priority 3Important Status Active Useful Life 10 years TCAAP No Description Current PW Superintendent truck- This truck is scheduled to cycle into PW crew use in 2028 and could possibly be pushed to replacement in 2030.Staff will reassess in 2027. Current miles18,961 justification Fleet CEP Points Replacement Guidelines Rating is 12.7 (Excellent condition) Preventative maintenance and repairs: PM; Repairs; 2022 - $84; $0 2023 - $282; $0 2024 - $84; $0 2025 - $85 $0 2026 - TBD Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total EquipNehicles/Furnishings 0 0 0 0 46,350 46,350 Total 0 0 0 0 46,350 46,350 Funding Sources 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Equipment/Building Replacement Fund 0 0 0 0 31,350 31,350 Trade -In Value 0 0 0 0 15,000 15,000 Total 0 0 0 0 46,350 46,350 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project# 31-EgpV-002 Project Name Replace 2020 Ford F-150 #603 Total Project Cost $46,350 Type Equipment Priority 3Important Useful Life 10 years Description This truck is used for PW/ Engineering. Current miles15,000 justification Fleet CEP Points Replacement Guidelines Rating is 13.7 (Excellent condition) Preventative maintenance and repair costs: PM; Repairs; 2022 - $90; $0; 2023 - $62; $0; 2024 - $60; $0; 2025 - $60 $$477 Department Equipment Category Vehicles Status Active TCAAP No Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Equip/Vehicles/Furnishings 0 0 0 0 46,350 46,350 Total 0 0 0 0 46,350 46,350 Funding Sources 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Equipment/Building Replacement 0 0 0 0 36,350 36,350 Fund Trade -In Value 0 0 0 0 10,000 10,000 Total 0 0 0 0 46,350 46,350 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project# 31-EgpV-001 Project Name Replace 2018 Ford Escape #85505 Total Project Cost $41,200 Department Equipment Type Equipment Category Vehicles Priority n/a Status Active Useful Life 10 years TCAAP No Description City Hall/ Building Inspections vehicle. Current miles 34,255 justification Fleet CEP Points Replacement Guidelines Rating is 15.7 (Excellent condition) Preventative maintenance and repair costs: PM; Repairs; 2023 - $70; $0; 2024 - $60; $0; 2025 - $55 $0 2026 - TBD Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Equip/Vehicles/Furnishings 0 0 0 0 41,200 41,200 Total 0 0 0 0 41,200 41,200 Funding Sources 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Equipment/Building Replacement Fund 0 0 0 0 36,200 36,200 Trade -In Value 0 0 0 0 5,000 5,000 Total 0 0 0 0 41,200 41,200 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project# 31-Eqp-001 Project Name Replace 2016 Trailer Tilt Deck for Mowers #85454 Total Project Cost $12,360 Department Equipment Type Equipment Category Equipment: Public Works Priority 3Important Status Active Useful Life 15 years TCAAP No Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Equip/Vehicles/Furnishings 0 0 0 0 12,360 12,360 Total 0 0 0 0 12,360 12,360 Funding Sources 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Equipment/Building Replacement Fund 0 0 0 0 10,360 10,360 Trade -In Value 0 0 0 0 2,000 2,000 Total 0 0 0 0 12,360 12,360 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 27-BLDG-003 Project Name City Hall Security System Total Project Cost $34,944 Contact Building Official Department Government Buildings Type Maintenance Category Building Repair & Maint Priority 4 Less Important Status Active Useful Life 15 years TCAAP No Description The current security systems will be approaching the end of their useful life and should be budgeted for phased replacement. justification New systems would result in a more secure building. As long as current systems are operational, the time of replacement would be at the discretion of the City. Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total EquipNehicles/Furnishings 15,495 0 0 0 0 15,495 Total 15,495 0 0 0 0 15,495 Funding Sources 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Equipment/Building Replacement 15,495 Fund 0 0 0 0 15,495 Total 15,495 0 0 0 0 15,495 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 27-BLDG-001 Project Name City Hall Elevator Total Project Cost $103,507 Contact Building Official Department Government Buildings Type Improvement Category Building Repair & Maint Priority 4 Less Important Status Active Useful Life 20 years TCAAP No Description Upgrades to the City Hall elevator system. justification The elevator currently in use at City Hall is original to the building. Most elevator components have an estimated lifespan of 25 years, at this point the original components have usually become obsolete. Refer to pages 4.13 and 4.25-4.26 of the full reserve study. Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total EquipNehicles/Furnishings 0 103,507 0 0 0 103,507 Total 0 103,507 0 0 0 103,507 Funding Sources 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Equipment/Building Replacement 0 103,507 0 0 0 103,507 Fund Total 0 103,507 0 0 0 103,507 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 27-BLDG-002 Project Name City Hall Furnishings Total Project Cost $46,445 Contact Building Official Department Government Buildings Type Equipment Category Building Repair & Maint Priority 4 Less Important Status Active Useful Life 20 years TCAAP No Description Update City Hall furnishings and equipment which vary in age. justification Useful life of different elements greatly vary, but it is recommended to budget for replacements, Reference Reserve Advisors Study, pages 4.15 - 4.17. Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total EquipNehicles/Furnishings 0 21,342 0 0 0 21,342 Total 0 21,342 0 0 0 21,342 Funding Sources 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Equipment/Building Replacement 0 Fund 21,342 0 0 0 21,342 Total 0 21,342 0 0 0 21,342 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 29-BLDG-001 Project Name Air Handler/HVAC Maintenance Total Project Cost $59,781 Contact Building Official Department Government Buildings Type Maintenance Category Building Repair & Maint Priority 5 Future Consideration Status Active Useful Life 50 years TCAAP No Description This will cover ongoning preventitive maintenance and replacement parts for the existing air handlers to keep them operational. justification Consistent maintenance of the air handlers and HVAC system will ensure the longest possible usefule lifespan before replacement is required. Refer to Reserve Advisors Study, Pages 4.20-4.21. Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Construction/Maintenance 0 0 0 59,781 0 Funding Sources Equipment/Building Replacement Fund Total 0 0 0 59,781 0 Total 59,781 59,781 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total 0 0 0 59,781 0 59,781 0 0 0 59,781 0 59,781 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 30-BLDG-001 Project Name City Hall Roof Total Project Cost $410,278 Contact Building Official Department Government Buildings Type Maintenance Category Building Repair & Maint Priority 3 Important Status Active Useful Life 25 years TCAAP No Description Complete replacement of all buit-up roof components. justification The current roof system is mostly original from the time of the buildings construction and is reaching the end of it's useful lifespan. Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Construction/Maintenance 0 0 0 0 410,278 410,278 Total 0 0 0 0 410,278 410,278 Funding Sources 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Equipment/Building Replacement 0 Fund 0 0 0 410,278 410,278 Total 0 0 0 0 410,278 410,278 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 30-BLDG-002 Project Name City Hall Entrance Canopy & Masonry Replacements Total Project Cost $106,569 Department Government Buildings Category Building Repair & Maint Status Active TCAAP No Contact Building Official Type Maintenance Priority 4 Less Important Useful Life 20 years Description Replacement of deteriorating masonry and grout work as well as painting of corroded steel components. justification Lintels and other structural steel components are starting to corrode, and the brick facade is showing evidence of weeping. Further explanation is provided in the Reserve Advisors Full Reserve Study, Pages 4.2-4.7. Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total EquipNehicles/Furnishings 0 0 0 0 106,569 106,569 Total 0 0 0 0 106,569 106,569 Funding Sources 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Equipment/Building Replacement 0 0 0 0 106,569 106,569 Fund Total 0 0 0 0 106,569 106,569 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 27-Park-003 Project Name Old Hwy 10 Trail - 96 to Valentine Park Total Project Cost $4,635,000 Contact Public Works Director Department Parks Department Type Improvement Category Park Capital Improvements Priority n/a Status Active Useful Life 25 years TCAAP No Description Construction of a new 6,500-feet in length, grade separated, 10-ft wide bituminous trail along the West side of Old Highway 10 from Lake Valentine Rd to Lakeshore Pl. justification The new trail will improve safety and adequately accommodate pedestrians & bicyclists along the Old Highway 10 Corridor between Lake Valentine Rd and Lakeshore PI in Arden Hills. The proposed trail improvements will complete the North -South connection from MN-51 to Hwy-96. Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Construction/Maintenance 4,635,000 0 0 0 0 4,635,000 Total 4,635,000 0 0 0 0 4,635,000 Funding Sources 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Grants 2,000,000 0 0 0 0 2,000,000 Capital Improvement Funds (PIR) 1,317,500 0 0 0 0 1,317,500 Ramsey County 1,317,500 0 0 0 0 1,317,500 Total 4,635,000 0 0 0 0 4,635,000 The 6,500-feet of new trail will be the responsibility of the City to maintain. Maintenance includes, snow/ice control (seasonally), crack sealing and fog sealing (approx. every 5 years). 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 27-Park-002 Project Name *2027 - Perry Park Improvement Project Total Project Cost $686,500 Contact Park & Recreation Mgr Department Parks Department Type Improvement Category Park Capital Improvements Priority 3 Important Status Active TCAAP No Description 2027 Perry Park Improvement Project This category is used for larger, site -specific park improvement projects that combine multiple asset types into one coordinated project. When a park -wide improvement project is developed, budgets for individual assets may be moved into the specific park project to support coordinated planning, design, bidding, and construction. Each asset listed below was previously budgeted in a different CIP category and has now been moved here for this specific project. The 2025 Park System Plan & parks staff identified the following needs for Perry Park's 2027 improvements: Location Asset Condition Timeline Year Cost Perry Ballfields & Dog Park Field Fair 1-3 Years 2027 $90,000 Perry Picnic Table - Shaded Fair 1-3 Years 2027 $6,500 Perry Picnic Pavilion - Fiber Optics Missing 1-3 Years 2027 $2,500 Perry Warming House - Fiber Optics Missing 1-3 Years 2027 $2,500 Perry Parking Lot Poor 1-3 Years 2027 $485,000 Perry Retaining wall - trail Poor 1 Year 2027 $100,000 Parking lot pavement rehabilitation project involving full -depth reclamation, spot curb repairs, ADA improvements and subgrade soil corrections - $485,000; Ball field and dog park grading, irrigation improvements, fencing repairs - $90,000. justification Parking lot pavement is deteriorating and reaching the end of service life. Public Works has placed large area patches to extend usability. Cost of maintenance is increasing each year. Drainage is poor at the ballfields and dog park, which leads to standing water, wet turf, muddy conditions, and reduced usability after rain events. Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Construction/Maintenance 686,500 0 0 0 0 686,500 Total 686,500 0 0 0 0 686,500 Funding Sources 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Capital Improvement Funds (PIR) 686,500 0 0 0 0 686,500 Total 686,500 0 0 0 0 686,500 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 27-PARK-004 Project Name *2027 - Ingerson Park Improvement Project Total Project Cost $550,500 Contact Park & Recreation Mgr Department Parks Department Type Improvement Category Park Capital Improvements Priority 3 Important Status Active TCAAP No Description 2027 Ingerson Park Improvement Project This category is used for larger, site -specific park improvement projects that combine multiple asset types into one coordinated project. When a park -wide improvement project is developed, budgets for individual assets may be moved into the specific park project to support coordinated planning, design, bidding, and construction. Each asset listed below was previously budgeted in a different CIP category and has now been moved here for this specific project. 2027 The 2025 Park System Plan & parks staff identified the following needs for Ingerson Park's 2027 improvements: Location Asset Condition Timeline Year Cost Ingerson Bench Fair 3-5 Years 2027 $2,000 Ingerson Bench - Swing Bench Poor 1-3 Years 2027 $3,000 Ingerson Picnic Table - 3 Fair 1-3 Years 2027 $10,500 Ingerson Trail Improvement New 2027 $100,000 Ingerson Picnic Shelter (Small) Fair 1-3 Years 2027 $85,000 Ingerson Playground Poor 1-3Years 2027 $350,000 justification The playground equipment and park furnishings at Ingerson Park are aging, in poor condition, and due for replacement. Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Construction/Maintenance 550,500 0 0 0 0 550,500 Total Funding Sources Capital Improvement Funds (PIR) Total 550,500 0 0 0 0 550,500 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total 550,500 0 550,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 550,500 0 550,500 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 26-Park-009 Project Name Snelling Ave N. & Royal Hills Trail Improvements Total Project Cost $472,500 Contact Public Works Director Department Parks Department Type Improvement Category Park Capital Improvements Priority 2 Very Important Status Active Useful Life 30 years TCAAP No Description Construction of a new 1,800-feet in length, grade separated, 10-ft wide bituminous trail along the West side of Snelling Ave N. Royal Hills Park to Highway 96. justification The new trail will improve safety and adequately accommodate pedestrians & bicyclists along the Snelling Ave. N. Corridor between Royal Hills Park and Highway 96. The proposed trail improvements are in coordination with the North Heights Apartments Development Agreement. Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Construction/Maintenance 472,500 0 0 0 0 472,500 Total 472,500 0 0 0 0 472,500 Funding Sources 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Park Capital Fund (Park Dedication 250,000 0 0 0 0 250,000 Fees) Developer Contribution 200,000 0 0 0 0 200,000 Capital Improvement Funds (PIR) 22,500 0 0 0 0 22,500 Total 472,500 0 0 0 0 472,500 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 27-PARK-003 Project Name *2027 - Sampson Park Improvement Project Total Project Cost $442,200 Contact Park & Recreation Mgr Department Parks Department Type Improvement Category Park Capital Improvements Priority 3 Important Status Active TCAAP No Description 2027 Sampson Park Improvement Project This category is used for larger, site -specific park improvement projects that combine multiple asset types into one coordinated project. When a park -wide improvement project is developed, budgets for individual assets may be moved into the specific park project to support coordinated planning, design, bidding, and construction. Each asset listed below was previously budgeted in a different CIP category and has now been moved here for this specific project. The 2025 Park System Plan & parks staff identified the following needs for Sampson Park's 2027 improvements: Location Asset Condition Timeline Year Cost Sampson Basketball Court (Half) Poor 1-3 Years 2027 $80,000 Sampson Basketball Hoop Poor 1-3 Years 2027 $7,000 Sampson Bench Poor 1-3 Years 2027 $2,000 Sampson Picnic Table Fair 1-3 Years 2027 $3,500 Sampson Receptacle -Trash - 2 Missing 1-3 Years 2027 $1,200 Sampson Sign (Park Entrance) Missing 1-3 Years 2027 $3,500 Sampson Playground (Climber) Poor 1-3 Years 2027 $260,000 Sampson Playground (Swings) Poor 1-3 Years 2027 $85,000 justification The playground equipment and park furnishings at Sampson park are aging, in poor condition, and due for replacement. Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 Construction/Maintenance 442,200 0 0 0 2031 Total 0 442,200 Total 442,200 Funding Sources 2027 0 2028 0 2029 0 2030 0 2031 442,200 Total Capital Improvement Funds (PIR) 442,200 0 0 0 0 442,200 Total 442,200 0 0 0 0 442,200 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 26-Park-001 Project Name Hamline Avenue N Trail Connection Improvement Total Project Cost $220,000 Contact Public Works Director Department Parks Department Type Improvement Category Park Capital Improvements Priority 3 Important Status Active Useful Life 25 years TCAAP No Description Multi -use grade -separated 10-foot wide bituminous trail improvement approximately 500-feet in length along the East side of Hamline Avenue North from the City of Roseville to the existing trail on Hamline Avenue North in Arden Hills. justification This trail improvement has been identified as a high priority connection. Coordination with surrounding agencies provides cost effectiveness and anticipated 2026 construction. Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Construction/Maintenance 220,000 0 0 0 0 220,000 Total Funding Sources 220,000 2027 0 2028 0 2029 0 2030 0 2031 220,000 Total Ramsey County 110,000 0 0 0 0 110,000 Capital Improvement Funds (PIR) 110,000 0 0 0 0 110,000 Total 220,000 0 0 0 0 220,000 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 26-PARK-022 Project Name Natural Resources Restoration Total Project Cost $2,777,705 Contact Park & Recreation M, Department Parks Department Type Maintenance Category Park Maintenance Priority 3 Important Status Active TCAAP No Description Great River Greening Projects Great River Greening projects, including restoration, invasive species removal, native plantings, habitat improvements, and stewardship work This category tracks grant -funded or partner -led natural resources projects completed with Great River Greening. Projects may include restoration, invasive species remov justification Great River Greening has previously funded work which is accounted for in other projects. This project is specifically for as -of -yet unfunded projects proposed in the 2026 I Floral, and Hazelnut Parks. Park Area Name Acreage 2027 2028 2029 2030 Hazelnut Mesic Forest & Power lines Prarie 9 $36,000 $30,150 $33,075 $21,1 Floral Woodland & Powerline Prarie 13.6 $163,880 $118,320 $89,080 $109, Chatham Floodplain Forest and Prarie 23 $189,750 $134,550 $125,350 $111,550 $122, Crepeau Nature Preserve 11 $25,500 $26,250 $27,000 $27,£ Totals $189,750 $359,930 $300,070 $260,705 $280, Note: These estimates come from the Great River Greening Natural Resources Management Brief, Pgs 22-23; 27-30, 33-34. GRG instructed to divide totals by 2, v the totals above. Expenditures Construction/Maintenance 2027 189,750 2028 359,930 2029 300,070 2030 260,705 2031 280,955 Total 1,391,410 Total Funding Sources 189,750 2027 359,930 2028 300,070 2029 260,705 2030 280,955 2031 1,391,410 Total Capital Improvement Funds (PIR) 189,750 359,930 300,070 260,705 280,955 1,391,410 Total 189,750 359,930 300,070 260,705 280,955 1,391,410 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 28-Park-001 Project Name Lake Johanna Blvd Trail Total Project Cost $4,175,000 Department Parks Department Type Improvement Category Park Capital Improvements Priority 3Important Status Active Useful Life 20 years TCAAP No Description Construction of a new 8,100-feet in length, grade separated, 10-ft wide bituminous trail along Lake Johanna Blvd in the North/West orientation from County Rd D to Old Snelling Ave. This will be a Ramsey County led project, proposed for design to begin in 2026 and construction in three phases: 2026-2028: Planning and Design 2029: Construction of Phase 1 from County Rd D to Lake Ln and the trail on County Rd E from New Brighton Rd to Lake Johanna Blvd. 2030: Construction of Phase 2 from County Rd E to Old Snelling 2031: Construction of Lake Ln to County Rd E The cost estimates are based off of the Ramsey County's 2026-2030 Transportation Improvement Plan and current cost -share policy. Justification The new trail will improve safety and adequately accommodate pedestrians & bicyclists along the Lake Johanna Boulevard Corridor between Old Snelling Ave and County Road D in Arden Hills. The proposed Lake Johanna Boulevard trail improvements will provide critical connections between Arden Hills neighborhoods, neighboring Cities, Tony Schmidt Regional Park, Bethel College and Mounds View High School. Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Construction/Maintenance 0 0 1,000,000 900,000 750,000 2,650,000 Land Acquisition 0 100,000 200,000 600,000 0 900,000 Planning/Design 175,000 150,000 200,000 0 0 525,000 Total Funding Sources 175,000 2027 250,000 2028 1,400,000 2029 1,500,000 2030 750,000 2031 4,075,000 Total Capital Improvement Funds (PIR) 175,000 250,000 1,400,000 1,500,000 750,000 4,075,000 Total 175,000 250,000 1,400,000 1,500,000 750,000 4,075,000 Budget Impact The 8,100-feet of new trail will be the responsibility of the City to maintain. Maintenance includes, snow/ice control (seasonally), crack sealing and fog sealing (approx. every 5 years). 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 26-PARK-020 Project Name *Trail and Walkway Rehabilitation Total Project Cost $800,000 Contact Park & Recreation Mgr Department Parks Department Type Improvement Category Park Capital Improvements Priority 3 Important Status Active TCAAP No Description Trail and Walkway Rehabilitation Park trails, internal walkways, paved paths, accessible routes, trail connections, viewing platforms This category supports the repair and replacement of park trails and walkways to maintain safe, accessible, and reliable routes through the park system. Projects may include internal walkways, paved paths, accessible routes, trail connections, viewing platforms, and related trail improvements. justification 2026: The 2025 Park System Plan identified the following trail for rehabilitation in the years 2027-2031. Location Asset Condition Timeline Year Cost Hazelnut Trails Poor 1-3Years 2027 $100,000 Elmer Anderson Trails Poor 1-3Years 2030 $700,000 Additionally, a new trail in Ingerson Park connecting the two cul-de-sacs was budgeted for $100,000 in the CIP for 2027. This amount has been moved to the "2027 Ingerson Park Improvement Project' in the CIP along with all other 2027 Ingerson Park Improvement projects. Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Construction/Maintenance 100,000 0 0 700,000 0 800,000 Total 100,000 0 0 700,000 0 800,000 Funding Sources 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Capital Improvement Funds (PIR) 100,000 0 0 700,000 0 800,000 Total 100,000 0 0 700,000 0 800,000 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 25-Park-004 Project Name Hazelnut Park Parking Lot Improvements Total Project Cost $100,000 Department Parks Department Type Improvement Category Park Capital Improvements Priority 4 Less Important Status Active TCAAP No Description Pavement rehabilitation project involving full -depth reclamation. justification The entirety of pavement for the parking lot is deteriorating and has exceeded its service life. Parking lot resides on property owned by church and is available for public use under the terms of a joint Use agreement. Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Construction/Maintenance 100,000 0 0 0 0 100,000 Total 100,000 0 0 0 0 100,000 Funding Sources 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Capital Improvement Funds (PIR) 100,000 0 0 0 0 100,000 Total 100,000 0 0 0 0 100,000 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 26-PARK-017 Project Name *Park Shelter and Building Renewal Total Project Cost $539,700 Contact Park & Recreation Mgr Department Parks Department Type Improvement Category Building Repair & Maint Priority 3 Important Status Active TCAAP No Description Park Shelter and Building Renewal Shelters, pavilions, restrooms, storage buildings, warming houses, roofs, doors, utility improvements This category supports reinvestment in park shelters, buildings, and support facilities to keep them safe, functional, and in good condition. Projects may include shelters, pavilions, restrooms, storage buildings, warming houses, roofs, doors, and utility improvements. justification Several older park shelters are in fair -to -poor condition and should be updated over time to match the City's standard park shelter style and quality expectations. The 2025 Park System Plan identified the following specific shelters for replacement in 2027-2031: (Please note: Ingerson Park's improvements were moved into the "2027 Ingerson Park Improvement Project" category and are no longer included in this specific project's Expenditures and Funding Sources tab.) Location Asset Condition Timeline Year Cost Hazelnut Picnic Shelter (Small) Poor 1-3 Years 2027 $85,000 Ingerson Picnic Shelter (Small) Fair 1-3 Years 2027 $85,000 Royal Hills Picnic Shelter (Small) Poor 1-3 Years 2029 $93,000 Freeway Warming House Poor 3-5 Years 2033 $247,500 Perry Portable enclosure Fair 10-20 Years 2034 $3,200 Community Gardens Picnic Shelter (Proposed) N/A N/A 2036 $107,500 Floral Portable enclosure Fair 10-20 Years 2037 $3,500 Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Construction/Maintenance 85,000 0 93,000 0 0 178,000 Total 85,000 0 93,000 0 0 178,000 Funding Sources 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Capital Improvement Funds (PIR) 85,000 0 93,000 0 0 178,000 Total 85,000 0 93,000 0 0 178,000 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 25-Park-007 Project Name *Park Planning & Design Concepts Total Project Cost $297,850 Department Parks Department Category Park Capital Improvements Status Active TCAAP No Description Contact Park & Recreation Mgr Type Administration Priority 2 Very Important Useful Life 9 years Park Planning and Design Master plans, feasibility studies, engineering, engagement, concept design, cost estimating This category supports the planning, analysis, and design work needed to make informed park investment decisions. Projects may include master plans, feasibility studies, engineering, public engagement, concept design, and cost estimating. justification 2025 The $75,000 fund included development and implementation of the City -Wide Park System Plan adopted by the City Council April 13, 2026. 2026-2034 The budgetted amounts per year for the next ten years will continue to support park system vision planning and implementation of the Park System Plan. Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Planning/Design 10,500 11,000 11,500 12,000 12,500 57,500 Total 10,500 11,000 11,500 12,000 12,500 57,500 Funding Sources 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Capital Improvement Funds (PIR) 10,500 11,000 11,500 12,000 12,500 57,500 Total 10,500 11,000 11,500 12,000 12,500 57,500 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 26-Park-006 Project Name GRG Floral Park NRMB Total Project Cost $26,125 Department Parks Department Type Unassigned Category Unassigned Priority n/a Status Active TCAAP No Description Partnership with Great River Greening for buckthorn and general habitat management at Floral Park. Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Other 5,225 5,225 5,225 0 0 15,675 Total Funding Sources 5,225 2027 5,225 2028 5,225 2029 0 2030 0 2031 15,675 Total Capital Improvement Funds (PIR) 5,225 5,225 5,225 0 0 15,675 Total 5,225 5,225 5,225 0 0 15,675 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 26-Park-007 Project Name GRG Hazelnut & Chatham NRMB Total Project Cost $12,000 Department Parks Department Type Unassigned Category Unassigned Priority n/a Status Active TCAAP No Description Partnership with Great River Greening for buckthorn and general habitat management at Hazelnut & Chatham Parks. Expenditures Other 2027 4,000 2028 0 2029 0 2030 0 2031 0 Total 4,000 Total Funding Sources 4,000 2027 0 2028 0 2029 0 2030 0 2031 4,000 Total Capital Improvement Funds (PIR) 4,000 0 0 0 0 4,000 Total 4,000 0 0 0 0 4,000 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 26-PARK-010 Project Name *Athletic Court / Hardcourt Rehabilitation Total Project Cost $340,500 Contact Park & Recreation Mgr Department Parks Department Type Maintenance Category Park Capital Improvements Priority 3 Important Status Active TCAAP No Description Athletic Court Rehabilitation Basketball courts, basketball hoops, tennis courts, pickleball courts, sport courts, court fencing, surfacing, striping, nets/posts This category includes rehabilitation and replacement of athletic courts and related amenities to keep park assets in excellent condition while providing safe, functional, accessible, and high -quality recreation facilities for the community. Projects may include court surfacing, striping, fencing, basketball hoops, nets, posts, and improvements to basketball, tennis, pickleball, and other sport and hardcourts. justification The 2025 Park System Plan includes an inventory of all park assets and identifies recommended improvements and replacements through the Park Asset Inventory and Investment Plan. The following improvements were identified for 2026-2031. (Please note: Sampson Park's improvements were moved into the "2027 Sampson Park Improvement Project" category and are no longer included in this specific project's Expendditures and Funding Sources tab.) Location Asset Condition Timeline Year Cost Sampson Basketball Court (Half) Poor 1-3 Years 2027 $80,000 Sampson Basketball Hoop Poor 1-3 Years 2027 $7,000 Hazelnut Combined Pickleball / Tennis Courts Poor 3-5 Years 2028 $184,000 Cummings Basketball Court (Full) Fair 5-7 Years 2032 $151,500 Cummings Basketball Hoop (2) Fair 5-7 Years 2032 $19,700 Cummings Sport Courts Fair 5-7 Years 2032 $82,500 Cummings Tennis Courts (2) Fair 5-7 Years 2032 $343,000 Hazelnut Basketball Court & hoops Fair 10 Years 2037 $200,000 Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Construction/Maintenance 0 184,000 156,500 0 0 340,500 Total 0 184,000 156,500 0 0 340,500 Funding Sources 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Capital Improvement Funds (PIR) 0 184,000 156,500 0 0 340,500 Total 0 184,000 156,500 0 0 340,500 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 26-PARK-014 Project Name *Park Furnishings Replacements Total Project Cost $106,600 Department Parks Department Category Park Capital Equipment Status Active Description Contact Park & Recreation Mgr Type Maintenance Priority 3Important TCAAP No Park Furnishings Replacement Benches, picnic tables, grills, trash/recycling containers, bike racks, pet waste stations, dog park gates, garden fencing, and related site amenities. This category provides for the replacement of frequently used site amenities that support comfort, cleanliness, accessibility, and the overall quality of park visits. Projects may include benches, picnic tables, grills, trash and recycling containers, bike racks, pet waste stations, dog park gates, garden fencing, and related furnishings. Justification Many benches, recycling containers, and trash receptacles in the park system are in poor condition and vary in style; this project will replace aging furnishings with consistent, durable amenities that are in good condition and create a more unified park system. The 2025 Park System Plan identified the following furnishings for replacement in the years 2027-2031: (Please note: Sampson Park's improvements were moved into the "2027 Sampson Park Improvement Project" category and are no longer included in this specific project's Expenditures and Funding Sources tab.) (Please note: Ingerson Park's improvements were moved into the "2027 Ingerson Park Improvement Project" category and are no longer included in this specific project's Expenditures and Funding Sources tab.) (Please note: Perry Park's improvements were moved into the "2027 Perry Park Improvement Project" category and are no longer included in this specific project's Expenditures and Funding Sources tab.) Location Asset Condition Timeline Year Cost Ingerson Bench Fair 3-5 Years 2027 $2,000 Ingerson Bench - Swing Bench Poor 1-3 Years 2027 $3,000 Expenditures Ingerson Picnic Table - 3 Fair 1-3 Years 2027 $10,500 Perry Picnic Table - Shaded Fair 1-3 Years 2027 $6,500 Sampson Bench Poor 1-3Years 2027 $2,000 Sampson Picnic Table Fair 1-3 Years 2027 $3,500 Sampson Receptacle-Trash-2 Missing 1-3Years 2027 $1,200 Cummings Receptacle - Recycling Fair 3-5 Years 2029 $1,300 Cummings Receptacle - Trash Fair 3-5 Years 2029 $3,200 Floral Bench - Qty. 2 Fair 3-5 Years 2029 $4,400 Arden Oaks Bench Poor 1-3 Years 2031 $2,400 Gardens Bench - Storage Fair 5 -10 Years 2031 $3,500 Royal Hills Bench - 2 Fair 5-10 Years 2031 $4,700 Royal Hills Receptacle -Recycling Fair 5-10Years 2031 $1,400 Royal Hills Receptacle - Trash Good 5-10Years 2031 $1,400 Royal Hills Receptacle-Trash-2 Fair 3-5 Years 2031 $2,800 Cummings Bench(5) Fair 5-10Years 2032 $12,000 Floral Receptacles & Bench (4) Fair 5-10 Years 2034 $11,400 Crepeau Receptacles (4) Good 5-10 Years 2034 $6,100 Royal Hills Bench (3) & Picnic Table (2) Fair 5-10 Years 2034 $16,500 Perry Receptacles (5) Fair 10-20 Years 2034 $8,900 Johanna Marsh Receptacles (2) Fair 10-20 Years 2035 $3,000 South Point Bench Fair 10-20 Years 2035 $2,500 Community Gardens Picnic Table Proposed 10-20 Years 2036 $4,700 Hazelnut Bench(3) Good 5-10Years 2037 $8,300 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total EquipNehicles/Furnishings 0 8,100 8,900 0 16,200 33,200 Total Funding Sources 0 2027 8,100 2028 8,900 2029 0 2030 16,200 2031 33,200 Total Capital Improvement Funds (PIR) 0 8,100 8,900 0 16,200 33,200 Total 0 8,100 8,900 0 16,200 33,200 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 28-Park-002 Project Name County Road Trail Projects Total Project Cost $6,350,000 Contact Public Works Director Department Parks Department Type Improvement Category Park Capital Improvements Priority 2 Very Important Status Active Useful Life 30 years TCAAP No Description 2028/2029 solicitation (As of May 2026, these have not been confirmed with Ramsey County): Lexington Ave. Trail (County Rd D/Harriet Ave.) - $2,100,000 estimate New Brighton Rd. Trail (County Rd D/County Rd E2) - $4,250,000 estimate justification Typically, on an annual basis, Ramsey County sends out a solicitation to accept applications for City -led projects that would occur within Ramsey County Right -of - Way and require coordination between both agencies. The proposed trails are identified within the City's Park System Plan as future trails. The City Council discussed priorities and provided direction on the proposed trails. The north side of County Rd D from Cleveland Ave to New Brighton Rd was not included at this time, as Ramsey County stated that segment would need to be constructed after their reconstruction project of County Rd D. Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Construction/Maintenance 0 0 6,350,000 0 0 6,350,000 Total 0 0 6,350,000 0 0 6,350,000 Funding Sources 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Ramsey County 0 0 5,080,000 0 0 5,080,000 Capital Improvement Funds (PIR) 0 0 1,270,000 0 0 1,270,000 Total 0 0 6,350,000 0 0 6,350,000 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 26-PARK-019 Project Name *Playground Replacement Total Project Cost $1,532,000 Department Parks Department Category Park Capital Improvements Status Active Description Contact Park & Recreation Mgr Type Improvement Priority 3Important TCAAP No Playground Replacement Playgrounds, swings, play containers, safety surfacing, play -area accessibility, gaga pits, play -based fitness equipment. This category supports the ongoing replacement and improvement of playgrounds to provide safe, accessible, engaging, and high -quality play experiences. Projects may include play structures, swings, play containers, safety surfacing, play -area accessibility, gaga pits, and play -based fitness equipment. justification Playgrounds should be replaced approximately every 20 years to maintain current safety, accessibility, and quality standards. Regular replacement also ensures play areas remain in good condition, meet community expectations, and continue to provide safe, engaging play experiences for children and families. The 2025 Park System Plan and the Arden Hills Playground Replacement Schedule both identfiy the following playgrounds needing replacement in the 2027-2031 yea rs: (Please note: Sampson Park's improvements were moved into the "2027 Sampson Park Improvement Project" category and are no longer included in this specific project's Expenditures and Funding Sources tab.) (Please note: Ingerson Park's improvements were moved into the "2027 Ingerson Park Improvement Project" category and are no longer included in this specific project's Expenditures and Funding Sources tab.) Location Asset Condition Timeline Year Cost Ingerson Playground Poor 1-3 Years 2027 $350,000 Sampson Playground (Climber) Poor 1-3 Years 2027 $260,000 Sampson Playground (Swings) Poor 1-3 Years 2027 $85,000 Royal Hills Playground Fair 1-3 Years 2029 $471,250 Future years Location Asset Condition Timeline Year Cost Cummings Gaga Pit Good 5-10 Years 2032 $3,600 Valentine Playground Fair 5-10Years 2033 $460,000 Valentine Playground (Swings) Fair 5-10Years 2033 $35,000 Hazelnut Gaga Pit Good 10-20 Years 2037 $4,150 Perry Playground Good 10-20Years 2037 $558,000 Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Construction/Maintenance 0 0 471,250 0 0 471,250 Total 0 0 471,250 0 0 471,250 Funding Sources 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 26-PARK-016 Project Name *Park Pavement Rehabilitation Total Project Cost $50,250 Department Parks Department Category Park Capital Improvements Status Active Contact Park & Recreation Mgr Type Maintenance Priority 3Important TCAAP No Description Park Pavement Rehabilitation Parking lots, access drives, pavement reconstruction, overlays, sealcoating, curbing, striping, pavement -related drainage This category supports the repair and replacement of paved park infrastructure to maintain safe access, extend pavement life, and protect the overall condition of park assets. Projects may include parking lots, access drives, pavement reconstruction, overlays, sealcoating, curbing, striping, and pavement -related drainage. justification The 2025 Park System Plan identified pavement rehabilitation needs throughout the park system, including the following for the years 2027-2031. The Freeway Park parking lot on County Rd. E should be expanding to accomodate the heavy hockey rink use in the winter. (Please note: Sampson Park's improvements were moved into the "2027 Sampson Park Improvement Project" category and are no longer included in this specific project's Expenditures and Funding Sources tab.) (Please note: Ingerson Park's improvements were moved into the "2027 Ingerson Park Improvement Project" category and are no longer included in this specific project's Expenditures and Funding Sources tab.) (Please note: Ingerson Park's improvements were moved into the "2027 Perry Park Improvement Project" category and are no longer included in this specific project's Expenditures and Funding Sources tab.) Location Asset Condition Timeline Year Cost Perry Parking Lot Poor 1-3 Years 2027 $485,000 Freeway Parking Lot Fair 3-5 Years 2029 $50,250 Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Construction/Maintenance 0 0 50,250 0 0 50,250 Total Funding Sources 0 2027 0 2028 50,250 2029 0 2030 0 2031 50,250 Total Capital Improvement Funds (PIR) 0 0 50,250 0 0 50,250 Total 0 0 50,250 0 0 50,250 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 26-PARK-012 Project Name *Hockey Rink Improvements Total Project Cost $821,000 Department Parks Department Category Park Capital Improvements Status Active Description Hockey Rink Improvements Hockey rinks, rink boards, rink surfacing/base, rink fencing Contact Park & Recreation Mgr Type Maintenance Priority 3Important TCAAP No This category includes rehabilitation and replacement of hockey rinks and related amenities to keep park assets in excellent condition while providing safe, functional, accessible, and high -quality winter recreation facilities for the community. Projects may include improvements to hockey rinks, rink boards, rink surfacing or base, and rink fencing. justification 2026: The 2025 Park System Plan includes an inventory of all park assets and identifies recommended improvements and replacements through the Park Asset Inventory and Investment Plan. The following improvements were identified for 2026-2031: The Hockey Rink at Freeway is in poor condition, with visible wear, deterioration, and aging materials that no longer meet the desired standard for a safe, functional, and high -quality park amenity. Location Asset Condition Timeline Year Cost Freeway Hockey Rink Poor 3-5 Years 2030 $175,000 Freeway Hockey Rink Lights (4) Fair 5-10 Years 2030 $113,000 In addition, Parks staff have identified Perry Park's Hockey Rink as having reached the end of it's service life and is in need of replacement: Location Asset Condition Timeline Year Cost Perry Hockey Rink Poor 3-5 Years 2031 $175,000 Perry Hockey Rink Lights Fair 5-10 Years 2031 $80,000 These two projects are budgeted only to replace the boards, fencing and lights with no other improvements to the rinks. Future Location Asset Condition Timeline Year Cost Hazelnut Hockey Rink /Dog Park Fair 10-20 Years 2037 $278,000 Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Construction/Maintenance 0 0 0 288,000 255,000 543,000 Total 0 0 0 288,000 255,000 543,000 Funding Sources 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Capital Improvement Funds (PIR) 0 0 0 288,000 255,000 543,000 Total 0 0 0 288,000 255,000 543,000 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 26-PARK-018 Project Name *Park Signage Replacement Total Project Cost $4,100 Department Parks Department Category Park Maintenance Status Active Description Contact Park & Recreation Mgr Type Improvement Priority 3Important TCAAP No Park Signage Replacement Entrance signs, regulatory signs, wayfinding signs, trail markers, kiosks, interpretive signs, dog park signs This category provides for clear, consistent, and well -maintained park signage that supports navigation, safety, rules, accessibility, and public information. Projects may include entrance signs, regulatory signs, wayfinding signs, trail markers, kiosks, interpretive signs, and dog park signs. justification The parks department has adopted a new standardized park sign design. As signs come to end of life, the new signs should match the standard signage. All park entrances should have an identifying sign. While the east side of Sampson Park has a new park sign, there is a missing sign on the west side. The Community Gardens has a sign in fair condition that should be replaced with the new sign design when it reaches end of life. The 2025 Parks System Plan identified the following signs for addition or replacement in the years 2027-2031: (Please note: Sampson Park's improvements were moved into the "2027 Sampson Park Improvement Project" category and are no longer included in this specific project's Expenditures and Funding Sources tab.) Expenditures Location Asset Condition Timeline Year Cost Sampson Sign (Park Entrance) Missing 1-3 Years 2027 $3,500 Community Gardens Sign (Park Entrance) Fair 5 -10 Years 2031 $4,100 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Construction/Maintenance 0 0 0 0 4,100 4,100 Total 0 0 0 0 4,100 4,100 Funding Sources 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Capital Improvement Funds (PIR) 0 0 0 0 4,100 4,100 Total 0 0 0 0 4,100 4,100 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 26-Pub-003 Project Name LJFD General Equipment Total Project Cost $532,530 Department Public Safety Type Equipment Category Public Safety Priority n/a Status Active TCAAP No Description Lake Johanna Fire Department provides a detailed capital budget, which includes the costs to each City. 2026. SCBA Replacement, Tire Replacement, Radio Programming/Repair, Mobile Radio Replacement, 2026 Utility/UN Equipment, Wildhand Hose/Nozzle/Bag Kits, New Hire Turnout Gear, ID Printer. Total Cost ($833,007) / Arden Hills Cost ($203,254) 2027. Tire/Computer Replacement, Network Devices, Radio Programmer/Repair, 2027 Engine Equipment, New Hire Turnout Gear, Replacement Turnout Gear. Total Cost ($232,094) / Arden Hills Cost ($56,631) 2028. Tire Replacement, Radio Programming/Repair, New Hire Turnout Gear. Total Cost ($67,275) / Arden Hills Cost ($16,415) 2029. Tire/Computer/Mobile Tablet Replacement, Radio Programming/Repair, New Hire Turnout Gear, Replacement Turnout Gear. Total Cost ($217,912) / Arden Hills Cost ($53,171) 2030. Tire/Computer Replacement. Total Cost ($31,025) / Arden Hills Cost ($7,570) 2031. Tire Replacement, Hydro Test SCBA Bottles. Total Cost ($13,660) / Arden Hills Cost ($3,333) 2032. Tire Replacement. Total Cost ($10,000) / Arden Hills Cost (2,440) Justification More detailed explanations can be found in the Lake Johanna Capital Budget. Expenditures 2027 2028 EquipNehicles/Furnishings 239,893 15,755 Total Funding Sources 239,893 15,755 2029 2030 2031 Total 20,371 2,366 2,490 280,875 20,371 2,366 2,490 280,875 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Public Safety Capital Fund 239,893 15,755 20,371 2,366 2,490 280,875 Total 239,893 15,755 20,371 2,366 2,490 280,875 Budget Impact There are no impacts to the operating budget of the City as it contracts for Fire Services from Lake Johanna Fire Department. Any savings as a result of this project would be reflected in the fire services contract in reduced maintenance costs. 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 27-Pub-001 Project Name LJFD Engine/Ladder Replacement Total Project Cost $487,403 Department Public Safety Type Equipment Category Public Safety Priority n/a Status Active TCAAP No Description Lake Johanna Fire Department provides the City with a Capital Budget each year outlining expected capital outflows the fire department has budgeted for the replacement of Rescue/Command/Utility vehicles in future years. 2026. Engine/Ladder Replacement. Total Cost ($595,000) / Arden Hills Cost: $145,180 2027. Engine/Ladder Replacement. Total Cost ($615,000) / Arden Hills Cost: $150,060 2032: Engine/Ladder Replacement. Total Cost ($784,913) / Arden Hills Cost: $191,519 Justification More detailed explanations can be found in the Lake Johanna Capital Budget. Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total EquipNehicles/Furnishings 153,135 0 0 0 189,088 342,223 Total 153,135 0 0 0 189,088 342,223 Funding Sources 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Public Safety Capital Fund 153,135 0 0 0 189,088 342,223 Total 153,135 0 0 0 189,088 342,223 Budget Impact There are no impacts to the operating budget of the City as it contracts for Fire Services from Lake Johanna Fire Department. Any savings as a result of this project would be reflected in the fire services contract in reduced maintenance costs. 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 26-Pub-004 Project Name LJFD Station Capital Total Project Cost $193,882 Department Public Safety Type Equipment Category Public Safety Priority n/a Status Active TCAAP No Description Lake Johanna Fire Department provides the City with a Capital Budget each year outlining expected capital outflows. 2026. No Capital expected for 2026. 2027. Total Cost is $268,000 / Arden Hills Cost is $65,392. Station 120 - Gear Dryer ($9,000); Arden Hills Cost ($2,178) Station 130 - Remodel of Admin Space to Staffed Station ($250,000), Gear Dryer ($9,000); Arden Hills Cost ($62,678) 2028. Total Cost is $300,000 / Arden Hills Cost is $73,200. Roof Replacement ($300,000) Justification More detailed explanations can be found in the Lake Johanna Capital Budget. Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total EquipNehicles/Furnishings 79,182 74,700 0 0 0 153,882 Total 79,182 74,700 0 0 0 153,882 Funding Sources 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Public Safety Capital Fund 79,182 74,700 0 0 0 153,882 Total 79,182 74,700 0 0 0 153,882 Budget Impact There are no impacts to the operating budget of the City as it contracts for Fire Services from Lake Johanna Fire Department. Any savings as a result of this project would be reflected in the fire services contract in reduced maintenance costs. 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 27-Pub-002 Project Name LJFD Rescue/Command/Utility Vehicle Replacement Total Project Cost $380,667 Department Public Safety Type Equipment Category Public Safety Priority n/a Status Active TCAAP No Description Lake Johanna Fire Department provides the City with a Capital Budget each year outlining expected capital outflows the fire department has budgeted for the replacement of Rescue/Command/Utility vehicles in future years. 2026. UV/Trailer/Utility Purchase. Total Cost ($210,000) / Arden Hills Cost ($51,240) 2027. Command/Vehicle Replacement. Total Cost ($120,000) / Arden Hills Cost ($29,820) 2028. Rescue Replacement, Command Vehicle Replacement. Total Cost ($462,300) / Arden Hills Cost ($112,801) 2029. No Capital expected in 2026. 2030. Tanker/Utility Replacement. Total Cost ($441,000) / Arden Hills Cost ($107,604) 2031. Command/Vehicle Replacement. Total Cost ($153,154) / Arden Hills Cost ($37,370) 2032. No Capital expected in 2032. 2033. Command/Vehicle Replacement. Total Cost ($168,852) / Arden Hills Cost ($41,200) Justification More detailed explanations can be found in the Lake Johanna Capital Budget. Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total EquipNehicles/Furnishings 29,880 113,544 0 109,809 36,354 289,587 Total Funding Sources 29,880 2027 113,544 2028 0 2029 109,809 2030 36,354 2031 289,587 Total Public Safety Capital Fund 29,880 113,544 0 109,809 36,354 289,587 Total 29,880 113,544 0 109,809 36,354 289,587 Budget Impact There are no impacts to the operating budget of the City as it contracts for Fire Services from Lake Johanna Fire Department. Any savings as a result of this project would be reflected in the fire services contract in reduced maintenance costs. 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 26-Sew-001 Project Name Sewer Lining/Rehabilitation Total Project Cost $2,755,000 Department Sanitary Sewer Department Type Maintenance Category Sanitary Sewer Maintenance Priority 2 Very Important Status Active Useful Life 40 years TCAAP No Description Sewer Lining and Rehabilitation of the sanitary sewer system on a 2-year cycle or when timing corresponds with the MCES I&I grant program. (2027): Venus Avenue Neighborhood (2029): Lift Station 2 Service Trail (2031): Hamline Avenue, Eide Circle, Floral Park connection (2033): Hamline Ave N. and Glenhill Rd (2035): Lift Station 5 and TH-10 manhole rehabilitation justification As part of our sanitary sewer program, manhole structures and sewer lines found with holes and cracks allowing for infiltration should be lined or repaired as needed. As the sewer infrastructure is aging, staff will continue to perform sewer inspections and identify locations needing sewer lining and other sewer improvements. Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Construction/Maintenance 660,000 0 460,000 0 325,000 1,445,000 Total 660,000 0 460,000 0 325,000 1,445,000 Funding Sources 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Sanitary Sewer Utility Fund 660,000 0 205,000 0 325,000 1,190,000 Surface Water Mgmt Utility Funds 0 0 135,000 0 0 135,000 Capital Improvement Funds (PIR) 0 0 60,000 0 0 60,000 Ramsey County 0 0 60,000 0 0 60,000 Total 660,000 0 460,000 0 325,000 1,445,000 Budget Impact This project will help the overall I&I reduction program. 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 26-Sew-002 Project Name Lift Station Rehabilitation Total Project Cost $1,989,000 Department Sanitary Sewer Department Type Maintenance Category Sanitary Sewer Maintenance Priority 2 Very Important Status Active Useful Life 20years TCAAP No Description Rehabilitation of lift stations to standardize and replace aging equipment, including pumps, valves, wet well components and electrical components. 2026: • LS 1 is scheduled for two pump rebuilds. Parts and Labor cost- $20,000 • LS 4 is scheduled for two pump rebuilds. Parts and Labor cost- $20,000 • LS 5 is scheduled for a full wet well rehab. This includes 2 pump replacements, base elbows, wet well misc. plumbing, and wet well epoxy coating and bypass pumping. Budget Estimate is $150,000 2027: • LS11 is scheduled for 2 pump rebuilds. The budget cost is $20,000 • LS 12 is scheduled for 2 pump rebuilds. The budget cost is $20,000 • LS 9 is scheduled for 2 pump rebuilds. The budget cost is $20,000 • Lift station SCADA phased update. The budget cost is $75,000 2029: • LS 8 is scheduled for a full wet well rehab. This includes 3 pump replacements, base elbows, wet well misc. plumbing, check valves, and wet well epoxy coating and bypass pumping. Budget Estimate is $220,000 • LS 9 is scheduled for 2 pump rebuilds. The budget cost is $23,000 2030: LS 3 is scheduled for 2 pump rebuilds. The budget cost is $24,000 LS 6 is scheduled for 2 pump rebuilds. The budget cost is $15,000 2032: • LS 7 is scheduled for 2 pump rebuilds. The budget cost is $24,000 • LS 13 is scheduled for 2 pump rebuilds. The budget cost is $24,000 2034 • LS 10 is scheduled for 2 pump rebuilds. The budget cost is $10,000 • LS 3 is scheduled for 2 pump rebuilds. The budget cost is $24,000 • LS 5 is scheduled for two pump rebuilds. Parts and Labor cost- $25,000 2036 • LS 9 is scheduled for a full wet well rehab. This includes 2 pump replacements, base elbows, wet well misc. plumbing, check valves, and wet well epoxy coating and bypass pumping. Budget Estimate is $170,000 • LS 4 is scheduled for a full wet well rehab. This includes 2 pump replacements, base elbows, wet well misc. plumbing, check valves, and wet well epoxy coating and bypass pumping. Budget Estimate is $170,000 • LS 14 is scheduled for 2 pump rebuilds. The budget cost is $10,000 • LS 13 is scheduled for 2 pump rebuilds. The budget cost is $15,000 justification The City has maintained a program to refurbish and update sanitary sewer lift stations on a frequencies that meet the demand and use, technology and risk management. Lift station pumps are routinely inspected, tested and replaced as necessary to prevent failure. Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Construction/Maintenance 135,000 0 243,000 39,000 0 417,000 Total 135,000 0 243,000 39,000 0 417,000 Funding Sources 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Sanitary Sewer Utility Fund 135,000 0 243,000 39,000 0 417,000 Total 135,000 0 243,000 39,000 0 417,000 Budget Impact Reduced maintenance costs. 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 27-Str-002 Project Name County Rd D Improvements - Ramsey County project Total Project Cost $100,000 Contact Public Works Director Department Street Department Type Improvement Category Streets: Reconstruction Priority 3 Important Status Active Useful Life 25 years TCAAP No Description County Road D, from Cleveland Avenue to New Brighton Road, is located on the border of Arden Hills (to the north) and Roseville (to the south), and adjacent to New Brighton (to the northeast). Ramsey County is resurfacing the roadway (0.49 miles) and incorporating a pedestrian and bike trail on the Roseville side of County Rd D, improved Metro Transit bus stops, new storm sewer, and new curb. justification This project is programmed in the Ramsey County's Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) scheduled for 2027 construction. Arden Hills is obligated to cover costs associated with the project following Ramsey County's cost participation policy. Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Construction/Maintenance 100,000 0 0 0 0 100,000 Total 100,000 0 0 0 0 100,000 Funding Sources 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Capital Improvement Funds (PIR) 100,000 0 0 0 0 100,000 Total 100,000 0 0 0 0 100,000 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 28-Str-001 Project Name 2028 PIMP Total Project Cost $6,425,000 Department Street Department Type Improvement Category Streets: Reconstruction Priority 2 Very Important Status Active Useful Life 20years TCAAP No Description Pavement Management Program (PMP) improvements consisting of spot curb repair, resurfacing as mill & overlay or full depth reclamation with new bituminous pavement, repairs to storm sewer inlets, dredging Fernwood, Hunters and Benton ponds and adding grit chambers, repairs to sanitary sewer manholes and castings, CIPP lining of existing clay pipe, watermain replacement within Benton Way neighborhood that affects the streets, hydrant repairs, valve repairs and protection improvements to the 16-inch trunk watermain. Street segments include: Benton Way, Tiller Lane (Lexington to Cannon Ave), Cannon Ave. (Tiller Ln to Dunlap), Dunlap St. N. (Cannon Ave to Ingerson Rd), Dellwood Ave., Carlton Dr., Fernwood St., Fernwood Ct., Pine Tree Dr., Harriet Ave, Walden PI., Hunters Ct., Lametti Ln., Lametti Ct., Bussard Ct., Stowe Ave. (coordination with New Brighton), and Glenhill Rd. (coordination with Roseville). justification Pavement conditions are showing distress with condition ratings from 43 to 67. Pavement conditions will continue to decline. Proposed improvements are necessary to continue safe and reliable street and utility services. These improvements will address the increasing costs for patching and maintaining highly deteriorated street pavement within the City, extensive large area patching was performed in 2022 by Public Works to extend the drivability of the streets until this project could occur. Watermain within Benton Way neighborhood consists of 58-year old cast iron pipe and has experienced several breaks in recent years, the goal will be to replace the segments that could impact the new road surface. Pond dredging is overdue in several ponds within the project corridor, City staff has received feedback from residents to perform maintenance. CIPP lining of the existing clay sanitary sewer pipe will prevent inflow and infiltration and root intrusion as well as extending the life of the pipe for 50+ years. Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Construction/Maintenance 0 6,425,000 0 0 0 6,425,000 Total Funding Sources Other 0 2027 0 6,425,000 2028 2,000,000 0 2029 0 0 2030 0 0 2031 0 6,425,000 Total 2,000,000 Surface Water Mgmt Utility Funds 0 1,450,000 0 0 0 1,450,000 Capital Improvement Funds (PIR) 0 1,275,000 0 0 0 1,275,000 Sanitary Sewer Utility Fund 0 575,000 0 0 0 575,000 Water Utility Funds 0 500,000 0 0 0 500,000 State Aid 0 425,000 0 0 0 425,000 Other City Governments 0 200,000 0 0 0 200,000 Total 0 6,425,000 0 0 0 6,425,000 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 30-Str-001 Project Name 2030 PMP Total Project Cost $5,355,000 Department Street Department Type Improvement Category Streets: Reconstruction Priority 2 Very Important Status Active Useful Life 20years TCAAP No Description Proposed improvements to Lake Valentine Rd. (Old Hwy 10 to MVHS), Northwoods Dr (Red Fox to cul-de-sac), Red Fox Rd (Lexington to cul-de-sac), Grey Fox (Lexington to Highway 51), Dunlap Street N, Connelly Ave, and Hamline Ave N (County Rd E to dead end) .Improvements include spot repair to existing curb, repairs to storm sewer catch basins, hydrant repairs, sanitary sewer manhole and casting repairs and CIPP lining at Red Fox Road and along Lake Valentine Rd. Pavement is proposed to be milled or full depth reclamation with new bituminous pavement. Replace existing watermain along Grey Fox Road. Replace water services on Dunlap St. Protection improvements to the 16-inch trunk watermain. justification Existing street pavement conditions are declining with ratings from 25 to 44. Proposed improvements are necessary to continue safe and reliable street and utility services. These improvements will address the increasing costs for patching and maintaining highly deteriorated street pavement within the City, extensive large area patching was conducted on streets in 2024. Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Construction/Maintenance 0 0 0 5,355,000 0 5,355,000 Total Funding Sources 0 2027 0 2028 0 2029 5,355,000 2030 0 2031 5,355,000 Total Other 0 0 0 2,300,000 0 2,300,000 Water Utility Funds 0 0 0 1,025,000 0 1,025,000 State Aid 0 0 0 875,000 0 875,000 Capital Improvement Funds (PIR) 0 0 0 530,000 0 530,000 Sanitary Sewer Utility Fund 0 0 0 425,000 0 425,000 Surface Water Mgmt Utility Funds 0 0 0 200,000 0 200,000 Total 0 0 0 5,355,000 0 5,355,000 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 26-W-006 Project Name Water Meter Replacement Total Project Cost $1,430,000 Contact Public Works Director Department Water Department Type Improvement Category Utility Improvements Priority 3 Important Status Active Useful Life 25 years TCAAP No Description Commercial water meters were replaced in 1997. Residential water meters were replaced in 2000. Meter Readers were replaced in 2012. This is a placeholder for replacing them throughout the City. $30,000 budgeted in 2026 for consultant work. justification Meters are at the end of their useful life. If TCAAP begins to develop, a new metering system must be determined before meters are needed for properties within TCAAP. Highly recommended to begin the consulting work in 2026 to prepare for future development. Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Other 900,000 0 0 0 0 900,000 Total 900,000 0 0 0 0 900,000 Funding Sources 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Water Utility Funds 900,000 0 0 0 0 900,000 Total 900,000 0 0 0 0 900,000 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 26-W-004 Project Name Water Tower Maintenance Total Project Cost $3,028,000 Contact Public Works Director Department Water Department Type Unassigned Category Utility Maintenance Priority 2 Very Important Status Active Useful Life 25 years TCAAP No Description 2027 -North Water Tower maintenance. Clean, inspect and repair tank interior of this 500,000 gallon storage facility in accordance with MN Department of Health guidelines. 2031 - South Water Tower order inspection report. 2032 - South Water Tower maintenance. Clean, inspect and repair tank interior of this 1 million gallon storage facility in accordance with MN Department of Health guidelines. 2033 - North Water Tower order inspection report. 2034 - North Water Tower maintenance. Clean, inspect and repair tank interior of this 500,000 gallon storage facility in accordance with MN Department of Health guidelines. 2038 - South Water Tower Full Rehabilitation Listed costs are estimates only. Inspections will determine the extent of minor repairs required. justification The MN Department of Health recommends that storage facilities for public water supply systems are inspected and maintained on a 5-year cycle. Last full rehabilitation project on South Tower was completed in 2013 ($816,256). Next one due in 2038. Last full rehabilitation project on North Tower was completed in 2018 ($608,125). Next one due in 2043. Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Construction/Maintenance 375,000 0 0 0 14,000 389,000 Total Funding Sources 375,000 2027 0 2028 0 2029 0 2030 14,000 2031 389,000 Total Water Utility Funds 375,000 0 0 0 14,000 389,000 Total 375,000 0 0 0 14,000 389,000 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 27-W-001 Project Name Booster Station Improvements (1230 Red Fox Rd) Total Project Cost $175,000 Department Water Department Type Unassigned Category Utility Maintenance Priority 2 Very Important Status Active Useful Life 20years TCAAP No Description Booster Station motor pump rehab, minor electrical components, building and site improvements, and water system SCADA upgrade - $175,000 The pumps and motors were inspected and tested in 2025 and found to have no issues at that point. Public Works recomends inspecting the pumps annually to plan for furture replacment budgeting. Per the arcitexcual and site inspection report dated August 16, 2023, the below items need mainence or replacment. Proposed 2027 Project Scope - Replace the existing standby generator fencing with a TREX no maintence product. Budget cost- $25,000 • Maintenance needed for spot roof repiars, and virtcal sealant joints on the building exterior. Budget cost- $10,000 • Replacment of the current water system monitoring system and design/ impliment an updated and expandable system as we look forward to TCAAP expanssion. Budget cost- $140,000 justification The booster station is a critical component of the water distribution system to supply water to the northern portion of the City. Proactive rehabilitation will better manage risks associated with water supply disruptions. Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Construction/Maintenance 175,000 0 0 0 0 175,000 Total 175,000 Funding Sources 2027 0 2028 0 2029 0 2030 0 2031 175,000 Total Water Utility Funds 175,000 0 0 0 0 175,000 Total 175,000 0 0 0 0 175,000 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 28-W-002 Project Name Meter Vault Improvements Total Project Cost $620,000 Department Water Department Category Utility Improvements Status Active TCAAP No Description Contact Public Works Director Type Improvement Priority 2 Very Important Useful Life 40 years The City of Roseville is planning replacement of the two existing water meter vaults located at County Rd D and Cleveland Avenue and County Rd D and New Brighton Rd in 2028 and 2030. justification Per the existing water service agreement with the City of Roseville, meter related costs are the responsibility of the City of Arden Hills. Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Construction/Maintenance 0 300,000 0 320,000 0 620,000 Total 0 300,000 0 320,000 0 620,000 Funding Sources 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Water Utility Funds 0 300,000 0 320,000 0 620,000 Total 0 300,000 0 320,000 0 620,000 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 26-W-007 Project Name Water System Model Update Total Project Cost $89,500 Department Water Department Type Operational Maintenance Category Utility Improvements Priority 3Important Status Active TCAAP No Description Conduct a Water System Model update. justification The last water model was conducted in 2019 and updated in 2026. Upgrades to the water distribution system are expected to occur with a new booster station (2027), watermain improvements on the Roseville connection at Hamline Ave. (2027), Spine Rd. utilities (2027). An update is needed to show current conditions. Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Planning/Design 0 0 46,750 0 0 46,750 Total 0 0 46,750 0 0 46,750 Funding Sources 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Water Utility Funds 0 0 46,750 0 0 46,750 Total 0 0 46,750 0 0 46,750 2027 thru 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Project # 26-W-002 Project Name Lake Johanna Blvd Watermain Assessment Total Project Cost $550,000 Department Water Department Category Utility Improvements Status Active TCAAP No Description Contact Public Works Director Type Improvement Priority 3Important Useful Life 50 years Condition assessment of 3.600-feet of existing 12-inch Ductile Iron Pipe (DIP) watermain along Lake Johanna Blvd. from County Rd E to Ridgewood Ct. This watermain has experienced a few leaks/breaks in recent years. Proposed replacement of watermain in 2030 if determined by condition assessment. Justification This watermain has experienced a few leaks/breaks in recent years. With the proposed trail improvements along this corridor, tentatively scheduled for construction in 2030, it is important to evaluate the condition of the existing pipe to plan for replacment if needed. The existing watermain material is DIP was installed in 1968 and the soil conditions are unknown but likely corrosive due to its proximity next to Lake Johanna. The funding proposed in 2030 is considered a placeholder until the condition assessment determines a recommendation for replacement of the existing watermain. Expenditures 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Construction/Maintenance 0 0 0 530,000 0 530,000 Total 0 0 0 530,000 0 530,000 Funding Sources 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Water Utility Funds 0 0 0 530,000 0 530,000 Total 0 0 0 530,000 0 530,000 2027 through 2031 Capital Improvement Plan Arden Hllls, MN Projects By Funding Source Source Project# Priority 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Capital Improvement Funds (PIR) Old Hwy 10 Trail - 96 to Valentine 27-Park-003 1,317,500 1,317,500 Park *2027 - Perry Park Improvement 27-Park-002 3 686,500 686,500 Project *2027 - Ingerson Park 27-PARK-004 3 550,500 550,500 Improvement Project *2027 - Sampson Park 27-PARK-003 3 442,200 442,200 Improvement Project Natural Resources Restoration 26-PARK-022 3 189,750 359,930 300,070 260,705 280,955 1,391,410 Lake Johanna Blvd Trail 28-Park-001 3 175,000 250,000 1,400,000 1,500,000 750,000 4,075,000 Hamline Avenue N Trail 26-Park-001 3 110,000 110,000 Connection Improvement *Trail and Walkway Rehabilitation 26-PARK-020 3 100,000 700,000 800,000 Hazelnut Park Parking Lot 25-Park-004 4 100,000 100,000 Improvements County Rd D Improvements 27 Str-002 3 100,000 100,000 Ramsey County project *Park Shelter and Building 26-PARK-017 3 85,000 93,000 178,000 Renewal Snelling Ave N. & Royal Hills Trail 26-Park-009 2 22,500 22,500 Improvements *Park Planning & Design Concepts 25-Park-007 2 10,500 11,000 11,500 12,000 12,500 57,500 GRG Floral Park NRMB 26-Park-006 5,225 5,225 5,225 15,675 GRG Hazelnut & Chatham NRMB 26-Park-007 4,000 4,000 2028 PMP 28-Str-001 2 1,275,000 1,275,000 *Athletic Court / Hardcourt 26-PARK-010 3 184,000 156,500 340,500 Rehabilitation *Park Furnishings Replacements 26-PARK-014 3 8,100 8,900 16,200 33,200 County Road Trail Projects 28-Park-002 2 1,270,000 1,270,000 *Playground Replacement 26-PARK-019 3 471,250 471,250 Sewer Lining/Rehabilitation 26-Sew-001 2 60,000 60,000 *Park Pavement Rehabilitation 26-PARK-016 3 50,250 50,250 2030 PIMP 30-Str-001 2 530,000 530,000 *Hockey Rink Improvements 26-PARK-012 3 288,000 255,000 543,000 *Park Signage Replacement 26-PARK-018 3 4,100 4,100 Capital Improvement Funds (PIR) Total 3,898,675 2,093,255 3,826,695 3,290,705 1,318,755 14,428,085 Developer Contribution Improvements 26-Park-009 2 200,000 200,000 Developer Contribution Total 200,000 0 0 0 0 200,000 EDA General Fund EDA General Fund Total 180,000 130,000 0 0 0 310,000 Equipment/Building Replacement Fund Replace 1993 Case 621 Loader , Source Project# Priority 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Replace 2009 Sterling Acterra Truck #431 27-EgpV-001 3 139,135 139,135 City Hall Security System 27-BLDG-003 4 15,495 15,495 Replace 2017 Mack Plow/Wing/ Dump Truck #123 28-EgpV-001 5 154,500 172,700 327,200 Replace 2015 Ford F-450 Plow/ Dump Truck #320 27-EgpV-003 2 120,000 120,000 Replace 2011 Bobcat E50 Compact 28-Eqp-005 2 105,000 105,000 Excavator#85214 City Hall Elevator 27-BLDG-001 4 103,507 103,507 Replace 2016 F-350 Pickup w/ Liftgate #455 27-EgpV-002 4 74,975 74,975 Replace 2013 Ford Escape #504 26-EgpV-003 33,500 33,500 City Hall Furnishings 27-BLDG-002 4 21,342 21,342 Replace Bobcat Snowblower 84" 28-Eqp-001 3 7,270 7,270 #118 Replace 2016 Stepp Asphalt Patch Trailer #121 28-Eqp-004 3 70,000 70,000 Replace 2023 Bobcat Toolcat 29-Eqp-004 2 50,000 50,000 #85478 Replace 2012 Workman #445 29-Eqp-003 3 35,550 35,550 Replace 1998 Tow Behind Air 28-Eqp-003 3 34,550 34,550 Compressor #107 Replace 2019 Bobcat Miller/Planer 29 Eqp-002 3 16,480 16,480 #129 Replace Snowblower 72" #468 29-Eqp-001 4 8,240 8,240 Replace 2009 Husqavarna 28-Eqp-002 3 7,800 7,800 Pavement Saw #113 Emergency Generator 27-Eqp-004 2 60,000 60,000 Replacement Schedule Air Handler/HVAC Maintenance 29-BLDG-001 5 59,781 59,781 Replace 2025 Bobcat Toolcat 30-Eqp-004 3 50,000 50,000 #85484 Replace 2016 Workman #456 30-Eqp-002 3 36,050 36,050 Replace 2 Toro Zero Turn Mowers 30-Eqp-005 3 28,000 28,000 Asset 85485, 85486 Replace Hotsy Pressure Washer 30-Eqp-001 4 5,150 5,150 #470 City Hall Roof 30-BLDG-001 3 410,278 410,278 City Hall Entrance Canopy & Masonry Replacements 30-BLDG-002 4 106,569 106,569 Replace 2018 Bobcat Skid Steer #85460 31-Eqp-002 3 70,000 70,000 Replace 2019 Ford F350 Crew Cab 29-EgpV-002 4 63,000 63,000 w/Tommygate #85323 Replace 2020 Bobcat Toolcat #461 25-Eqp-004 2 57,400 57,400 Replace 2020 Ford F-150 #603 31-EgpV-002 3 36,350 36,350 Replace 2018 Ford Escape #85505 31-EgpV-001 36,200 36,200 Trade in Program Toro Z Mowers 25-Eqo-001 3 32,741 32,741 #473 & #474 Replace 2019 Ford F-150 #602 29-EgpV-001 3 31,350 31,350 Replace 2019 Ford F-150 Ext Cab 28 EgpV-002 3 31,350 31,350 #601 Replace 2016 Trailer Tilt Deck for 31-Eqp-001 3 10,360 10,360 Mowers #85454 Concrete Flatwork, Partial 30-BLDG-003 5 0 0 Equipment/Building Replacement Fund Total 429,630 620,094 395,320 238,981 885,598 2,569,623 Source Project# Priority 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Grants Old Hwy 10 Trail - 96 to Valentine 27-Park-003 2,000,000 2,000,000 Park Grants Total 2,000,000 0 0 0 0 2,000,000 Other 2028 PMP 28-Str-001 2 2,000,000 2,000,000 2030 PMP 30-Str-001 2 2,300,000 2,300,000 Other Total 0 2,000,000 0 2,300,000 0 4,300,000 Other City Governments 2028 PMP 28-Str-001 2 200,000 200,000 Other City Governments Total 0 200,000 0 0 0 200,000 Park Capital Fund (Park Dedication Fees) Snelling Ave N. & Royal Hills Trail 26-Park-009 2 250,000 250,000 Improvements Park Capital Fund (Park Dedication Fees) Total 250,000 0 0 0 0 250,000 Public Safety Capital Fund LJFD General Equipment 26-Pub-003 239,893 15,755 20,371 2,366 2,490 280,875 LJFD Engine/Ladder Replacement 27-Pub-001 153,135 189,088 342,223 LJFD Station Capital 26-Pub-004 79,182 74,700 0 0 0 153,882 LJFD Rescue/Command/Utility 27-pub-002 29,880 113,544 109,809 36,354 289,587 Vehicle Replacement Public Safety Capital Fund Total 502,090 203,999 20,371 112,175 227,932 1,066,567 Ramsey County Old Hwy 10 Trail - 96 to Valentine 27-Park-003 1,317,500 1,317,500 Park Hamline Avenue N Trail 26-Park-001 3 110,000 110,000 Connection Improvement County Road Trail Projects 28-Park-002 2 5,080,000 5,080,000 Sewer Lining/Rehabilitation 26-Sew-001 2 60,000 60,000 Ramsey County Total 1,427,500 0 51140,000 0 0 6,567,500 Sanitary Sewer Utility Fund Sewer Lining/Rehabilitation 26-Sew-001 2 660,000 205,000 325,000 1,190,000 Lift Station Rehabilitation 26-Sew-002 2 135,000 243,000 39,000 417,000 Emergency Generator 27-Eqp-004 2 70,000 60,000 130,000 Replacement Schedule 2028 PMP 28-Str-001 2 575,000 575,000 2030 PMP 30-Str-001 2 425,000 425,000 Sanitary Sewer Utility Fund Total 865,000 575,000 448,000 524,000 325,000 2,737,000 State Aid 2028 PMP 28-Str-001 2 425,000 425,000 2030 PMP 30-Str-001 2 875,000 875,000 State Aid Total 0 425,000 0 875,000 0 1,300,000 Source Project# Priority 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total Surface Water Mgmt Utility Funds 2028 PMP 28-Str-001 2 1,450,000 1,450,000 Sewer Lining/Rehabilitation 26-Sew-001 2 135,000 135,000 2030 PMP 30-Str-001 2 200,000 200,000 Surface Water Mgmt Utility Funds Total 0 1,450,000 135,000 200,000 0 1,785,000 Trade -In Value Replace 1993 Case 621 Loader 25-Eqp-001 25,000 25,000 #103 Replace 2009 Sterling Acterra Truck #431 27-EgpV-001 3 20,000 20,000 Emergency Generator 27-Eqp-004 2 5,000 5,000 5,000 15,000 Replacement Schedule Replace 2015 Ford F-450 Plow/ Dump Truck #320 27-EgpV-003 2 26,000 26,000 Replace 2011 Bobcat E50 Compact 28-Eqp-005 2 25,000 25,000 Excavator#85214 Replace 2016 F-350 Pickup w/ Liftgate #455 27-EgpV-002 4 10,000 10,000 Replace 2013 Ford Escape #504 26-EgpV-003 8,000 8,000 Replace Bobcat Snowblower 84" 28-Eqp-001 3 2,000 2,000 #118 Replace 2017 Mack Plow/Wing/ Dump Truck #123 28-EgpV-001 5 35,000 35,000 Replace 2023 Bobcat Toolcat 29-Egp-004 2 30,000 30,000 #85478 Replace 2016 Stepp Asphalt Patch Trailer #121 28-Eqp-004 3 25,000 25,000 Replace 2009 Husqavarna 28-Eqp-002 3 2,500 2,500 Pavement Saw #113 Replace 2012 Workman #445 29-Eqp-003 3 1,500 1,500 Replace 1998 Tow Behind Air 28-Eqp-003 3 1,500 1,500 Compressor#107 Replace 2025 Bobcat Toolcat 30-Eqp-004 3 30,000 30,000 #85484 Replace 2 Toro Zero Turn Mowers 30-Eqp-005 3 14,000 14,000 Asset 85485, 85486 Replace 2020 Bobcat Toolcat #461 25-Eqp-004 2 25,000 25,000 Replace 2019 Ford F350 Crew Cab 29-EgpV-002 4 15,000 15,000 w/Tommygate #85323 Replace 2019 Ford F-150 Ext Cab 28-EgpV-002 3 15,000 15,000 #601 Replace 2019 Ford F-150 #602 29-EgpV-001 3 15,000 15,000 Trade in Program Toro Z Mowers #473 & #474 25-Eqo-001 3 15,000 15,000 Replace 2020 Ford F-150 #603 31-EgpV-002 3 10,000 10,000 Replace 2018 Bobcat Skid Steer #85460 31-Eqp-002 3 10,000 10,000 Replace 2018 Ford Escape #85505 31-EgpV-001 5,000 5,000 Replace 2016 Trailer Tilt Deck for 31-Eqp-001 3 2,000 2,000 Mowers #85454 Trade -In Value Total 50,000 76,000 95,500 49,000 112,000 382,500 Water Utility Funds Water Meter Replacement 26-W-006 3 900,000 900,000 Water Tower Maintenance 26-W-004 2 375,000 14,000 389,000 Booster Station Improvements �, ,,, �. „- --- _,_ _-- Source Project# Priority 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Total 2028 PMP 28-Str-001 2 500,000 500,000 Meter Vault Improvements 28-W-002 2 300,000 320,000 620,000 Emergency Generator 27-Eqp-004 2 120,000 120,000 Replacement Schedule Water System Model Update 26-W-007 3 46,750 46,750 2030 PMP 30-Str-001 2 1,025,000 1,025,000 Lake Johanna Blvd Watermain 26-W-002 3 530,000 530,000 Assessment Water Utility Funds Total 1,450,000 920,000 46,750 1,875,000 14,000 4,305,750 GRAND TOTAL 11252,895 8,693,348 10,107,636 9,464,861 2,883,285 42,402,025 City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Capital Improvement Plan SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Beginning Balance (Fund Balance) 2,952,649 3,021,401 215,586 (2,312,307) (5,000,301) (9,249,780) Revenues and Other Fund Sources Developer/Park Dedication 1,423,500 450,000 - Transfers - - - - - - Special Assessments 731,181 240,020 1,137,522 285,861 1,363,386 443,386 MSA State Street Aid 390,970 398,790 398,790 398,790 398,790 398,790 LGA 24,051 24,050 24,050 24,050 24,050 24,050 Grants 480,000 2,000,000 200,000 - - - Ramsey County 80,000 1,427,500 - 5,140,000 - - Tax Levy 430,000 430,000 430,000 430,000 430,000 430,000 Total Revenues and Other Fund Sources 3,559,702 4,970,360 2,190,362 6,278,701 2,216,226 1,296,226 Total Funds Available 6,512,351 7,991,761 2,405,948 3,966,394 (2,784,075) (7,953,554) Expenditures and Uses Prior year projects - final costs (394,225) - - - Park Planning & Design Parks (10,000) (10,500) (11,000) (11,500) (12,000) (12,500) Hamline Avenue N Trail Connection Improvement Parks (160,000) (220,000) Arden Oaks ADA Improvements Parks (67,500) Old Highway 10 Trail, Lake Valentine to Hwy 96 Parks (4,635,000) Perry Park Improvements Parks (686,500) Ingerson Park Improvements Parks (550,500) Snelling Ave N & Royal Hills Trail Improvement Parks (450,000) (472,500) Sampson Park Improvements Parks (442,200) Lake Johanna Blvd Trail Parks (100,000) (175,000) (250,000) (1,400,000) (1,500,000) (750,000) Trail & Walkway Rehabilitation Parks (100,000) (700,000) Hazelnut Park Parking Lot Improvements Parks (100,000) Park Shelter & Building Renewal Parks (85,000) (93,000) GRG Floral Park NRMB Parks (5,225) (5,225) (5,225) (5,225) GRG Hazelnut & Chatham NRMB Parks (4,000) (4,000) Athletic Court/Hardcourt Rehabilitation Parks (200,000) (184,000) (156,500) Natural Resources Restoration Parks (189,750) (359,930) (300,070) (260,705) (280,955) Park Furnishings/Signage Replacements Parks (8,100) (8,900) (20,300) County Road Trail Projects Parks (6,350,000) Playground Replacement Parks (471,250) Park Pavement Rehabilitation Parks (50,250) Hockey Rink Improvements Parks (288,000) (255,000) Park Lighting/Electrical/Utility Improvements Parks Sewer Lining/Rehabilitation Sewer (120,000) County Rd D Improvements - Ramsey County Streets (100,000) 2026 PMP Streets (2,100,000) 2028 PMP Streets (3,900,000) 2030 PMP Streets (3,705,000) Total Expenditures and Uses (3,490,950) (7,776,175) (4,718,255) (8,966,695) (6,465,705) (1,318,755) Change in Fund Balance 68,752 (2,805,815) (2,527,893) (2,687,994) (4,249,479) (22,529) Ending Balance 3,021,401 215,586 (2,312,307) (5,000,301) (9,249,780) (9,272,309) $0.5 c -$1.5 ■� -$3.5 -$5.5 -$7.5 -$9.5 -$11.5 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 85 City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Capital Improvement Plan SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 EDA General Fund - i Beginning Balance (Fund Balance) 831,679 728,241 442,186 202,946 90,426 (25,474) Revenues and Other Fund Sources Grant - Twin Cities Gateway - - - - - Tax Levy Total Revenues and Other Fund Sources - - - - - Total Funds Available 831,679 728,241 442,186 202,946 90,426 (25,474) Expenditures and Uses Gateway Signs - (180,000) (130,000) - - Operating Expenditures (103,438) (106,055) (109,240) (112,520) (115,900) (119,370) Total Expenditures and Uses (103,438) (286,055) (239,240) (112,520) (115,900) (119,370) Change in Fund Balance (103,438) (286,055) (239,240) (112,520) (115,900) (119,370) Ending Balance 728,241 442,186 202,946 90,426 (25,474) (144,844) N $500.0 $400.0 o $300.0 r ~ $200.0 $100.0 -$100.0 -$200.0 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 86 City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Capital Improvement Plan SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS Beginning Balance (Fund Balance) Revenues and Other Fund Sources Transfers from Utility funds Trade in Value Tax Levy Total Revenues and Other Fund Sources Total Funds Available Expenditures and Uses Building Vehicles Equipment Total Expenditures and Uses Change in Fund Balance Ending Balance 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 772,991 802,491 836,361 679,767 747,947 972,466 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 39,500 45,000 71,000 95,500 46,500 112,000 100,000 163,500 163,500 163,500 163,500 163,500 439,500 508,500 534,500 559,000 510,000 575,500 1,212,491 1,310,991 1,370,861 1,238,767 1,257,947 1,547,966 - (15,495) (124,849) - (59,781) (516,847) (229,500) (159,135) (426,975) (207,700) (258,250) (180, 500) (300, 000) (139, 270) (283,120) (225, 700) (222, 501) (410,000) (474,630) (691,094) (490,820) (285,481) (997,598) 29,500 33,870 (156,594) 68,180 224,519 (422,098) 802,491 836,361 679,767 747,947 972,466 550,368 N $1,200.0 r $1,000.0 3 r $800.0 H $600.0 $400.0 $200.0 $0.0 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 87 City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Capital Improvement Plan SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS Beginning Balance (Fund Balance) Revenues and Other Fund Sources Charitable Gambling Tax Levy Total Revenues and Other Fund Sources Total Funds Available Expenditures and Uses LJFD Engine/Ladder Replacement LJFD Rescue/Chief/Utility Vehicle Replacement LJFD General Equipment LJFD Station Capital Total Expenditures and Uses Change in Fund Balance Ending Balance 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 637,958 570,284 208,194 144,195 263,824 291,649 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 312,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 332,000 140,000 140,000 140,000 140,000 140,000 969,958 710,284 348,194 284,195 403,824 431,649 (145,180) (153,135) - - - (189,088) (51, 240) (29, 880) (113, 544) (109, 809) (36, 354) (203, 254) (239, 893) (15, 755) (20, 371) (2,366) (2,490) (79,182) (74, 700) (399,674) (502,090) (203,999) (20,371) (112,175) (227,932) (67,674) (362,090) (63,999) 119,629 27,825 (87,932) 570,284 208,194 144,195 263,824 291,649 203,717 $0.4 C 0 $0.2 $0.0 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 88 City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Capital Improvement Plan SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS Beginning Balance (Cash Balance) Revenues and Other Fund Sources Trade in Value Operating Revenue Total Revenues and Other Fund Sources Total Funds Available Expenditures and Use Prior year projects - final costs Lift Station Rehabilitation Sewer Lining/Rehabilitation Emergency Generators 2026 PMP 2028 PMP 2030 PMP Debt Service Operating Expenses Operating transfer to Equipment Fund Total Expenditures and Uses Change in Fund Balance Ending Balance 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1,203,016 1,294,687 1,001,242 932,177 922,777 812,607 - 5,000 - - Z500 - 2, 808,020 2,791,880 2, 786,730 2,786,810 2, 786,890 2, 786,970 2,808,020 2,796,880 2,786,730 2,786,810 2,789,390 2,786,970 4,011,036 4,091,567 3,787,972 3,718,987 39712,167 3,599,577 (181,344) - - - - - (190,000) (135,000) (243,000) (39,000) (660,000) (205,000) (325,000) (75,000) (62,500) (200, 000) (575, 000) (425, 000) (39,350) (37,950) (36,725) (40,600) (1,979,655) (2,056,375) (2,118,070) (2,181,610) (2,247,060) (2,314,470) (126,000) (126,000) (126,000) (126,000) (126,000) (126,000) (2,716,349) (3,090,325) (2,855,795) (2,796,210) (2,899,560) (2,765,470) 91,670 (293,445) (69,065) (9,400) (110,170) 21,500 1,294,687 1,001,242 932,177 922,777 812,607 834,107 N $1.6 o $1.4 $1.2 $1.0 $0.8 $0.6 $0.4 $0.2 $0.0 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 89 City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Capital Improvement Plan SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS Beginning Balance (Cash Balance) Revenues and Other Fund Sources Operating Revenue Total Revenues and Other Fund Sources Total Funds Available Expenditures and Uses 2026 PMP 2028 PMP 2030 PMP Sewer Lining/Rehabilitation Operating Expenses Transfer to Equipment Fund Total Expenditures and Uses Change in Fund Balance Ending Balance 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 5.0% 2.0% 2.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1,158,957 987,032 1,329,782 221,692 429,532 549,542 1,078,288 1,134,160 1,154, 840 1,177, 940 1,177, 940 1,177, 940 1,078,288 1,134,160 1,154,840 1,177,940 1,177,940 1,177,940 2,237,245 2,121,192 2,484,622 1,399,632 1,607,472 1,727,482 (500, 000) - - - - - (1,450,000) (200, 000) (135, 000) (676,213) (717,410) (738,930) (761,100) (783,930) (807,450) (74, 000) (74, 000) (74, 000) (74, 000) (74, 000) (74, 000) (1,250,213) (791,410) (2,262,930) (970,100) (1,057,930) (881,450) (171,925) 342,750 (1,108,090) 207,840 120,010 296,490 987,032 1,329,782 221,692 429,532 549,542 846,032 $1.5 0 $1.0 $0.5 $0.0 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 90 City of Arden Hills, Minnesota Capital Improvement Plan SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS Beginning Balance (Cash Balance) Revenues and Other Fund Sources Operating Revenue Trade in Value Grants Total Revenues and Other Fund Sources Total Funds Available Expenditures and Uses Water Meter Replacement Water Tower Maintenance Booster Station Improvements Meter Vault Improvements Water System Model Update Lake Johanna Blvd Watermain Assessment Trunk Water Main Condition Assessment Emergency Generators 2026 PMP 2028 PMP 2030 PMP Debt Service Operating Expenses Transfer to Equipment Fund Total Expenditures and Uses Change in Fund Balance Ending Balance 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 3.0% 4.0% 4.0% 3.0% 0.0% 2,799,047 2,782,351 1,607,466 1,004,266 1,327,251 88,631 3,292,978 3,440,830 3,568,810 3,706,500 3,814,110 3,815,040 - - 5,000 - - - 882, 364 - 4,175,342 3,440,830 3,573,810 3,706,500 3,814,110 3,815,040 6,974,390 6,223,181 5,181,276 4,710,766 5,141,361 3,903,671 (530, 000) (900, 000) - - - - (12, 000) (375, 000) (14, 000) (175, 000) (300, 000) (320, 000) (42, 750) (46, 750) (20, 000) (530, 000) (20, 000) (125, 000) (500, 000) (500, 000) (1,025,000) (248,150) (249,150) (250, 950) (248, 675) (2,719,139) (2,816,565) (2,901,060) (2,988,090) (3,077,730) (3,170, 060) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (4,192,039) (4,615,715) (4,177,010) (3,383,515) (5,052,730) (3,284,060) (16,697) (1,174,885) (603,200) 322,985 (1,238,620) 530,980 2,782,351 1,607,466 1,004,266 1,327,251 88,631 619,611 $2.0 a 0 $1.5 $1.0 $0.5 $0.0 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 91 PRELIMINARY 2027 BUDGET LEVY IMPACT Attachment C Description Effect on Levy % Chg Step increases 68,333 3% COLA Adjustments 59,240 Health (15%) & Dental (4%) Insurance 43,430 Work Comp (17,260) General Fund Personnel Costs 153,743 Increase in Delinquent Taxes 45,071 Decrease in Building Permits/Plan Check Fees 39,159 Increase in MSAS maintenance aid (9,070) Decrease in Rec Program fees 11,250 Increase in Antenna rental revenue (16,727) Increase in RamCo Sheriff training reimb revenue (32,481) Increase in RamCo Sheriff 247,792 Increase in UFD 383,221 Increase in Ramco Dispatch 14,920 Remove transfer for LJFD fte's (franchise fees) 165,000 Election Equipment (next 3-4 years) 15,000 Metro-INET IT Services 8,192 RamCo Facility Maintenance Facility - Rent 2,381 2040 Comp Plan 120,000 2040 Comp Plan - $60k funded by Gen'I Fund fund balance (60,000) Legal Expenses 26,000 Tuition Reimbursement 6,000 Street Maintenance Program (sea Icoati ng/resurfacing) 65,000 Technology (new permit software) 33,272 Net changes in other GF Budget Areas 10,781 Other General Fund Costs TOTAL GENERAL FUND COSTS PIR Fund EDA Fund 1,074,761 1,228,504 Equipment/Bldg Replacement 63,500 Public Safety (192,000) Total Capital Fund Costs (128,500) TOTAL GENERAL & CAPITAL FUND COSTS 1,100,004 2.27 15.85 18.12% -1.89% 16.22% GENERAL FUND REVENUES Taxes Special assessments Licenses and permits Intergovernmental Charges for services Fines & forfeits Investment earnings Miscellaneous Transfers In TOTAL REVENUES EXPENDITURES Mayor & Council Administration Elections Finance TCAAP Planning & Zoning Government Buildings Police Dispatch Fire Emergency Management Protective Inspections Street Maintenance Recreation Park Maintenance Transfers out TOTAL EXPENDITURES NET CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE 2024 2025 2026 2027 $Increase % Increase Actual Actual Budget Budget (Decrease) (Decrease) $ 4,622,581 $ 5,201,279 $ 5,892,322 $ 7,074,048 $ 1,181,726 20.1% - - - - - N/A 448,587 962,258 574,150 564,570 (9,5801 -1.7% 116,870 134,054 165,379 206,930 41,551 25.1% 504,134 639,948 470,251 447,470 (22,781) -4.8% 27,298 27,610 24,225 26,530 2,305 9.5% 163,638 264,255 50,000 50,000 - 0.0% 9,247 57,211 13,330 15,750 2,420 18.2% - - 165,000 - (165,0001 -100.0% $ 5,892,355 $ 7,286,615 $ 7,354,657 $ 8,385,298 $ 1,030,641 14.0% $ 80,035 $ 91,970 $ 85,743 $ 85,980 $ 237 0.3% 507,785 471,814 524,881 555,950 31,069 5.9% 32,141 34,285 35,906 53,840 17,934 49.9% 163,075 198,924 225,193 238,240 13,047 5.8% 119,702 78,267 139,170 142,980 3,810 2.7% 307,494 257,497 327,410 497,170 169,760 51.8% 224,822 247,307 250,032 254,630 4,598 1.8% 1,583,188 1,927,657 1,994,763 2,242,555 247,792 12.4% 70,394 42,913 86,350 101,270 14,920 17.3% 833,933 892,173 1,065,552 1,448,773 383,221 36.0% 5,134 7,414 9,270 9,420 150 1.6% 331,654 338,413 428,700 463,810 35,110 8.2% 716,138 723,305 943,854 1,034,950 91,096 9.7% 195,101 295,159 378,008 398,580 20,572 5.4% 556,736 728,167 759,825 817,150 57,325 7.5% 50,000 50,000 100,000 100,000 - 0.0% $ 5,777,329 $ 6,385,267 $ 7,354,657 $ 8,445,298 $ 1,090,641 14.8% $ 115,025 $ 901,348 $ - $ (60,000 $ (60,000) N/A Attachment D Arden Hills Equipment Replacement Guidelines 3 Year Cycle Zero Turn Mowers 5-7 Year Cycle Weed Trimmers, Push Type Lawn Mowers, Walk behind Snow Blower, handheld blower, Toolcat 8-10 Year Cycle Pick-up Trucks, Power Hedge Trimmer, Back Pack Blowers, Power Pole Pruner, Large Area Mower 10-12 Year Cycle 1-Ton Dump Trucks, City Hall Vehicles, Asphalt Hot Box, Large Dump Truck 13-15 Year Cycle Skid Steer, J Tamper, Plate Compactor, Chain Saws, Chop Saws, Cement Mixer, Turf Utility Carts, Small Generators 15-17 Year Cycle Street Sweeper, Tanker Truck, Asphalt Roller, Backhoe, Misc. Pumps, Sewer Camera Trailer, Brush Chipper, Trailers 18-20 Year Cycle Pavement Saw, Large Air Compressor, Trench Box 20-22 Year Cycle Sewer Jetter-Vac Combo, Mini Ex 20-25 Year Cycle Front End Loader, Sewer Easement Machine, Aerator 25+ Year Cycle Large Generators, Turf Sweeper AGENDA ITEM - 3D MEMORANDUM DATE: August 10, 2026 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Jessica Jagoe, City Administrator SUBJECT: City Council Code of Conduct/Norms of Behavior Discussion Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A Council Should Consider Council should review Resolution 2016-022 for City Council Norms of Behavior and provide direction to Staff on next steps. Background At the April 141h Work Session, the City Council reviewed Resolution 2016-22 which is the City Council Norms of Behavior. Council requested that staff verify if the League of MN Cities had a template Code of Conduct policy that could be a starting point for this discussion. Additionally, there was a reference to the Elected Officials Guide that LMC also produces. Staff were asked to gather some of these resources together and share those with the Council for future discussion. LMC states that generally policies will take one of two forms: either a values statement expressing core principles for ethical conduct or a formal code of conduct. From the Minnesota Mayors Handbook produced by the League of Minnesota Cities there is the following suggestion: Codes of conduct are written more like bylaws or regulations for an organization. Generally, they prescribe explicit standards of behavior and provide for formal complaints, hearings, and censure. For example, a code of conduct might state, "No member may knowingly violate the Open Meeting Law." Included as Attachment D is a sample Code of Conduct created by the League of Minnesota Cities Ethics Advisory Panel from the Minnesota Mayors Handbook. Additionally, City staff is including as Attachment E the Blaine City Council Code of Conduct. Page 1 of 2 For Resolution 2016-22, the City Council should review to determine if this remains sufficient or provide Staff with direction on updates for the Norms of Behavior. Budget Impact N/A Attachments Attachment A: Resolution 2016-22 Attachment B: January 3, 2024 Special Work Session Minutes Attachment C: April 14, 2025 Work Session Minutes Attachment D: LMC Sample Code of Conduct Attachment E: Blaine City Council Code of Conduct Page 2 of 2 Attachment A -z3 [� HILLS CITY OF ARDEN HILLS COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2016-022 RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING CITY COUNCIL NORMS OF BEHAVIOR BE IT RESOLVED BY THE ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL THAT THE NORMS OF BEHAVIOR ARE HEREBY ESTABLISHED AS FOLLOWS: 1. Speak only for yourself, not for other Councilmembers — unless specifically tasked by your colleagues to speak for the group. 2. Don't question motives. Assume others have positive intentions, even when you disagree. 3. Be respectful of one another, and the public process, at all times. Do not criticize Staff or others in public. 4. Aim of consensus, but accept decisions of the majority once made. 5. Stay focused on the elected official role — policy, prioritization, and citizen representation. 6. Work primarily through the City Administrator or a Department Head, and through line staff with prior arrangement. May work with the writer of a memo in a packet to request information for clarification. Refrain from attending staff meetings, trainings, "rides -along" or group staff functions unless specifically invited or cleared by the City Administrator. 7. Respect Staff and the fact that they work for the Council as a whole. Don't expect or ask them to engage in the fray (secrets, gossip, triangulation), make your individual case (to take sides), or to be your "insider" (informant). ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS THIS 27th DAY OF DUNE, 2016. David Grant, gayor TT T:. J ie Hanson, City Clerk 'It Attachment B ,-ARZEN HILLS Approved: February 12, 2024 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION JANUARY 3, 2024 5:30 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY HALL CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Grant called to order the Special City Council Work Session at 5:30 p.m. Present: Mayor David Grant, Councilmembers Brenda Holden, Emily Rousseau, Tena Monson and Tom Fabel Absent: None Also present: City Administrator Dave Perrault and League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT) Collaboration Services Manager Aimee Gourlay 1. AGENDA ITEMS A. Council Discussion with LMCIT Collaboration Services Ms. Gourlay said the goal is to give them the opportunity to discuss what they might like to do or change about the Norms of Behavior/Code of Conduct, and what the process would be for moving forward. She reviewed the items they hope to achieve; productive and efficient Council meetings, improved teamwork and agreement on process. She asked if anyone wanted to add anything else. Council also requested to talk about respect and decency. Ms. Gourlay said she would add that under meeting management. She explained the agenda and said she had brought a short Code of Conduct summary from the League of Minnesota Cities. She said the League doesn't have a standard code as they are specific to each community. Some cities have very detailed codes and Duluth has one paragraph. She expanded on the items they would be discussing. The idea was to share and hear others ideas and incorporate as many considerations as they could. The goal of a Code of Conduct is to increase their ability to have positive conflict that helps get good outcomes, and decrease the likelihood of interpersonal negative conflicts that can detract from making good decisions. Ms. Gourlay explained the Norms of Behavior 2016 could be a starting point because it already exists. Discussion was probably more important than the paper at this point. ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION - JANUARY 3, 2024 2 Council discussed issues in the past related to processes and how they have or have not come to agreement on items. Ms. Gourlay said it was about perceptions and how you're feeling about the discussion. What they seem to agree on the need to balance the meeting efficiency with making sure everyone's voice is heard and making sure the conversation is appropriate to the topic. They could talk about how to move on when all opinions have been voiced. If they feel like they're hearing the same thing and want to move on for efficiency sake, how does the Mayor know? Council discussed how side comments or underhanded remarks affect decorum. Ms. Gourlay said you're probably not listening well if there are side comments, and people will shut down if they're hearing things as attacks. That is a part of meeting decorum. It can be difficult if Councilmembers are speaking for long periods of time. So how do they balance making sure everyone has a voice? Maybe everyone says their initial thoughts and has longer to speak after that. Ms. Gourlay thought there was already a divide about how they were feeling about respect. She wondered if only some people were experiencing that or if it was a council -wide consideration. Council discussed past issues or events that they have felt contributed to feelings of disrespect or mistrust. Ms. Gourlay thought getting to a point of understanding that could be another piece of the code. And whatever code they come up with everyone has to be willing to go along with. She watched a video of a meeting but she didn't see much of this dynamic. Ms. Gourlay said there may be a need to address some of the past hurt in some way however, something that can be helpful is to look at places they've been more successful and see how they can take what is working and build on that. Council discussed teamwork and their perspectives on information sharing. Ms. Gourlay stated they're talking about Code of Conduct, but it really keeps coming back to this one issue. She asked what they needed to move forward. Council discussed better communication moving forward and past issues, also discussed looking forward not at the past when making decisions. Council discussed adding agenda items to formally report back to Council, such as, Committee/Commission updates. Ms. Gourlay said one thing they were talking about was committee reports and separating that from Council Comments. They also talked about agreeing to disagree about the past and not bring it up going forward. They talked about annual committee updates and sharing City goals. Ms. Gourlay commented that one of the things she's observing is that it's hard to get to consensus because what they're talking about keeps shifting. ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION - JANUARY 3, 2024 3 Ms. Gourlay reiterated they wanted efficient meetings, to stay on appropriate topics, everyone's voice be heard, and to avoid personal comments. Some of the items they are considering would address some of that list. Ms. Gourlay said sometimes councils have struggles with how to get things on the agenda, what's the complaint process, or the process for taking something off the consent agenda. Oftentimes it has to do with how things get heard. She wondered what's the process for assigning committees, is there an assumption that everyone gets a committee and similar types of things. Council discussed adding committee/commission reports to future agendas, and about tying it into committee/commission liaison responsibilities. Ms. Gourlay recommended they have a work session item for discussion of committee updates before it be brought for a vote at a regular meeting so there is no misunderstanding of what the policy will be. She asked if this session was a useful conversation. Council discussed not bring up past issues when making decisions affecting the present and future. Ms. Gourlay said they should move forward with discussing the issues they talked about at work sessions and if they would like her to come back she could. She could also arrange for not full group discussions. Ms. Gourlay said they remind her of good people with knowledge coming together from different places but the team can't come together. Council thanked Ms. Gourlay for her time. 2. COUNCIL/STAFF COMMENTS City Administrator Perrault said he had emailed two questions to the Council. The 2024 PMP was at 80% plan and was scheduled to be an item on the upcoming work session, did they prefer to leave it on that meeting. Also, did they want to schedule a retreat, if so he will find a date. Councilmember Rousseau would rather do a special work session on January 22 for the PMP, and she would love to have a retreat in March or April. Councilmember Monson was comfortable with having the PMP discussion on either date but she could make January 22 work. Mayor Grant explained there's what they go in at and then there's the bid. So, 80% was probably close enough. Councilmember Monson said then she was fine with it being on January 8 at 80%. She would like to have city goals at a retreat but didn't think they needed the personality piece. Mayor Grant felt a retreat was the wrong way to approach it. He thought it would be better for the group to look at some strategic topics and discuss them. He didn't know if they needed ARDEN HILLS SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION — JANUARY 3, 2024 4 someone else to help them do that. He thought a facilitator would make it more touchy-feely and they would probably waste time with ice breaker type stuff. Councilmember Fabel agreed. Councilmember Monson said she found Ms. Gourlay to be valuable in these discussions. Councilmember Rousseau asked if they were going to go through the list of work session topics at the next work session and prioritize them. Mayor Grant was thinking more strategic than chickens or food trucks; he was worried more about bigger things like trails and the fire station. City Administrator Perrault said he was planning to include the list of work session priorities on the next work session so Council can let staff know what they want to bring forward in what order. Councilmember Rousseau explained that things they see on the list as a priority could be what they base a strategic plan on. Councilmember Holden asked if they were going to update the Council Tracker. City Administrator Perrault said past practice was they only removed things at Council direction. Councilmember Rousseau asked how they were moving forward with a Code of Conduct for committees. Ms. Gourlay said she had examples from other cities to send to the Mayor and Councilmember Rousseau. I\ 11 rsl IMok Mayor Grant adjourned the Special City Council Work Session at 7:09 p.m. //�:�.�� ai Zii _4j. itimi David Grant Mayor Attachment C ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — APRIL 14, 2025 14 regarding how PTRC are going to pay for the parks is a priority, above some of the other items on the list. We need to decide what is most important. Councilmember Rosseau asked if it could be two Fridays vs. a Friday and Saturday. Councilmember Holden can't do 14 hours. Back to back days doesn't work. In the past, it was nice to take a step back and think about what was discussed. Councilmember Weber asked if it had to be consecutive days. City Administrator Jagoe didn't ask that question. Her experience was the Friday/Saturday. She will ask if there is an option to do a Friday and then a second Friday a month later. Councilmember Weber said he could support that, with Hue Life. He is not interested in the other proposal. Councilmember Holden asked when it was decided it would be a Friday. City Administrator Jagoe said she heard Council talk about a Friday. Councilmember Monson said they did a similar session with the Fire Board. There were three months between sessions. We can't spread it that far because we will want this complete in time for budgeting. It was nice to have that space between sessions. Mayor Grant said we should try to keep the hours down, maybe not two full days. City Administrator Jagoe will follow up with the consultant to see about scheduling two sessions with some time between. She sought clarification if Council wanted to agree on availability and see if it works for the consultant, or should we schedule it when they can fit us in. Councilmember Holden said everyone needs to be at the first one. Councilmember Weber said we will probably have to have the consultant say when they are available and then move on it when we find a date that works for everyone. City Administrator Jagoe said she will follow up on dates. She wanted to confirm that Council plus the Directors and City Clerk should attend. She asked if there was anyone else that should be included in the invitation. Discussion ensued regarding start time, possible dates and what items will be focused on. City Administrator Jagoe will discuss availability with the consultant and send out dates to Council. C. Council Norms of Behavior City Administrator Jagoe said on March loth, this item was brought to the Work Session along with the Committee/Commission Code of Conduct Policy. The Council Norms of Behavior, ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — APRIL 14, 2025 15 Resolution 2016-22 is being brought back for Council review. She asked Council if there are any updates or changes, they want to make. Councilmember Monson thinks the Norms of Behavior is a good place to start but she feels that reading it, it was written in response to the dynamics that were happening at that time. She provided something previously that more broadly discussed honesty and integrity. She thought we could check with LMC to see if they have a template. She thinks the items are very specific. Councilmember Weber said he went through all the chapters of the Elected Officials Guides on the LMC site. He thinks the information is very comprehensive guidance for elected officials and ethics guidance. He provided the information to City Administrator Jagoe. He requested she share that information with the rest of the Council. City Administrator Jagoe said she will pass that along to the entire council. Councilmember Rousseau asked if City Administrator Jagoe would share that along with Councilmember Holden's notes, as well. Councilmember Holden said in item #3, there is language regarding public testimony. She believes the word `immoral' should be removed. We shouldn't use that word. We talk about being respectful of one another but we also have to include resident interactions. D. Twin Cities Gateway Funding Discussion Mayor Grant said there is just under $20,000 plus some roll-over from the previous year. He is grateful the Visitor's Bureau allowed that. These funds need to be used to advertise and promote events that will bring people into Arden Hills to use hotels and patronize our businesses. He believes the ice swim event would qualify. We've used it for Rib Fest and Bethel Homecoming. He reminded that we have the 75th Anniversary of Arden Hills coming in 2026. He asked Council if they had any preference for prioritizing the list. Councilmember Rousseau said she is interested in using half of the amount for Rib Fest and the other half for the ice swim. She would like John Connelly to talk with Al Stauffacher to help shepherd the process of the Regional Grant for the ice swim event. She understands they will do that for a newer event. Mr. Stauffacher seemed interested in the ice swim. She said it seems like we typically discuss this funding source in April. She wondered if the 75th Anniversary should be on the list for next year, with all of the 2026 funds going towards that event. Mayor Grant said that is the Council's decision to make. He said the grant awards are based on a formula. He said the numbers are holding and we can probably expect about the same amount next year. Councilmember Holden would like to use a little of the 2025 money to advertise a save the date for the 75th Anniversary. She thinks we should send out one big flyer. A mailing is $2,000. She thinks we should send out a mailing announcing that 2026 is the 75th Anniversary. Something that advertises us as a City to all the residents and businesses. She isn't willing to give it to Bethel. They never even thanked us. Mayor Grant isn't aware if Staff has received any communication. Attachment D For example, "I serve the public interest when I recognize and support the public's right to know the public's business." Values -based codes generally set aspirational "do's," while codes of conduct stress "don'ts," as discussed below. You can find a sample Statement of Values in Appendix F at the end of this memo. b. Codes of conduct See Appendix G: Sample Code Codes of conduct are written more like bylaws or regulations for an of Conduct. organization. Generally, they prescribe explicit standards of behavior and provide for formal complaints, hearings, and censure. For example, a code of conduct might state, "No member may knowingly violate the Open Meeting Law." You can find a sample Code of Conduct in Appendix G at the end of this memo. C. Enforceability i. Values statements Because of the aspirational and sometimes subjective nature of values -based codes, formal enforcement might be difficult and likely counterproductive. Compliance is better left to the individual's conscience. ii. Codes of conduct Minn. Stat. § 410.20. Charter cities may provide for recall of elected public officials in their charter. However, recall of public officials is not possible in statutory cities. In addition, there is no authority in state statute to provide for removal of a council member by vote of the council or through application of a city -based ethics policy. There is also no authority to levy fines for violations. As a result, city codes of conduct for elected officials are generally enforced through censure. Censure is a formal resolution of council stating that a council member has violated the city's ethical rules and expressing disapproval of their actions. IV. Mayor -council relationship Because mayors of statutory cities lack significant individual authority, the key to a successful mayor -council relationship often lies in recognizing the mayor's role (and its limits) and working from there to build productive partnerships with fellow council members. A. Meetings and the mayor -council relationship Minnesota Mayors Chapter 1 -36 Association Appendix G: Sample Code of Conduct Created by the League of Minnesota Cities Ethics Advisory Panel — October 2009; Revised December 2017 .01. Purpose. The City Council of the City of determines that a code of conduct for its members, as well as the members of the various boards and commissions of the City of , is essential for the public affairs of the city. By eliminating conflicts of interest and providing standards for conduct in city matters, the City Council hopes to promote the faith and confidence of the citizens of in their government and to encourage its citizens to serve on its council and commissions. .02. Standards of conduct. Subd. 1. No member of the City Council or a city board or commission may knowingly: a. Violate the Open Meeting Law. b. Participate in a matter that affects the person's financial interests or those of a business with which the person is associated, unless the effect on the person or business is no greater than on other members of the same business classification, profession, or occupation. c. Use the person's public position to secure special privileges or exemptions for the person or for others. d. Use the person's public position to solicit personal gifts or favors. e. Use the person's public position for personal gain. £ Except as specifically permitted pursuant to Minn. Stat. 471.895, accept or receive any gift of substance, whether in the form of money, services, loan, travel, entertainment, hospitality, promise, or any other form, under circumstances in which it could be reasonably expected to influence the person, the person's performance of official action, or be intended as a reward for the person's official action. g. Disclose to the public, or use for the person's or another person's personal gain, information that was gained by reason of the person's public position if the information was not public data or was discussed at a closed session of the City Council. h. Disclose information that was received, discussed, or decided in conference with the city's legal counsel that is protected by the attorney -client privilege unless a majority of the City Council has authorized the disclosure. i. Represent private interests before the City Council or any city committee, board, commission, or agency. (optional) Subd. 2. Except as prohibited by the provisions of Minn. Stat. § 471.87, there is no violation of subdivision 1 b. of this section for a matter that comes before the council, board, or commission if the member of the council, board, or commission publicly discloses the circumstances that Minnesota Mayors 74 Association would violate these standards and refrains from participating in the discussion and vote on the matter. Nothing herein shall be construed to prohibit a contract with a member of the City Council under the circumstances described under Minn. Stat. § 471.88, if proper statutory procedures are followed. .03. Complaint, hearing. Any person may file a written complaint with the city clerk alleging a violation of the standards of conduct in section _02. The complaint must contain supporting facts for the allegation. The City Council may hold a hearing after receiving the written complaint or upon the council's own volition. A hearing must be held only if the City Council determines: 1) upon advice of the city attorney, designee, or other attorney appointed by the council, that the factual allegations state a sufficient claim of a violation of these standards or rise to the level of a legally recognized conflict of interest, and 2) that the complaint has been lodged in good faith and not for impermissible purposes such as delay. The City Council's determination must be made within 30 days of the filing of the allegation with the city clerk. If the council determines that there is an adequate justification for holding a hearing, the hearing must be held within 30 days of the City Council's determination. At the hearing, the person accused must have the opportunity to be heard. If, after the hearing, the council finds that a violation of a standard has occurred or does exist, the council may censure the person, refer the matter for criminal prosecution, request an official not to participate in a decision, or remove an appointed member of an advisory board or commission from office. Minnesota Mayors 75 Association r BlaineMN.gov W Live I Work I Growl BLAINE CITY COUNCIL - CODE OF CONDUCT Contents IntroductoryPledge.............................................................................................................................................. Compliance and Enforcement..................................................................................................................................... Complywith the Law............................................................................................................................................ Roles of Council, Staff and Commissions.............................................................................................................. Workingwith Staff....................................................................................................................................................... Working with Boards/Commissions...................................................................................................................... Workingwith the Community..................................................................................................................................... City Staff and the Public, Council Conduct with Staff........................................................................................... Council Conduct with the Public, Internal Council Conduct................................................................................ Intergovernmental Relations...................................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTORY PLEDGE Blaine residents and businesses deserve a fair, ethical and accountable local government that earns the public's full confidence for integrity. Recognizing these goals, the code of conduct is established for all elected officials of the City of Blaine. As a member of the Blaine City Council, we agree to uphold the introductory pledge for elected officials adopted by the city council and conduct myself by the following model of behavior. We will: • Comply with the law, including o Staying within the city council's authority o Following the open meeting, gift, and conflict of interest laws • Respect city council roles and responsibilities when working with staff, boards and commissions • Be consistent in policy and respect process • Fulfill the council's fiduciary responsibility to act in the best interest of the city, and all of its residents, both financially and legally by: o keeping the common good as the highest purpose to focus on achieving constructive solutions for the public benefit o not disclosing private or confidential information of the city or using that information to advance personal interests. The mayor and councilmembers must maintain the confidentiality of all non-public information concerning property, personnel, or legal affairs of the city. They must neither disclose confidential information without proper legal authorization, nor use such information to advance their personal, financial or other private interests. Such disclosure is a violation of the Rules of Order and Procedure and the Council Code of Conduct. o protecting city interests and liability by following advice of legal counsel COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT The code of conduct expresses standards of ethical conduct expected for members of the Blaine City Council. Members themselves have the primary responsibility to assure the public that ethical standards are understood and met, and that the public can continue to have full confidence in the integrity of government. We will hold ourselves and each other accountable and when there is a suspected violation of the law, we will discuss with the city manager. COMPLY WITH THE LAW Members shall comply with the applicable federal laws, state laws, and city ordinances in the performance of their public duties. Authority The city's legislative powers are granted to the council as a whole, and not to individual members. The council as a whole is a policy -making board and as such, it is not the duty of the council to administer the day-to-day operations of the city. Many items will come before the council as required by city ordinance, but many issues are more discretionary in nature. It is important that the council and staff work together to differentiate between administrative duties that are relevant to staff, and those decisions that are of a policy -making nature and should come before the council. All councilmembers, including those serving as presiding officer, have equal votes. No councilmember has more power than any other councilmember, and all should be treated with equal respect. Members are elected officials serving on the city council and councilmembers shall not attempt to act as, or carry out the responsibilities of, city staff or the city manager beyond what is outlined in the city charter and code. Councilmembers shall not undermine the authority of the city manager and city staff as those individuals carry out their duties as authorized by the city charter, code and the motions and resolutions adopted by majority of the city council. Including but not limited to speaking on behalf of council or city staff, media engagement, developers, property owners or residents without approval of a majority of council. Mayoral Role According to Blaine City Charter Chapter 2, Section 2.06 the mayor is a full member of the council in addition to acting as presiding officer of meetings; representing the city ceremoniously; and executing official documents. Open Meeting Law (OML) Public deliberations and processes shall be conducted openly and in a transparent manner. The Minnesota Open Meeting Law Chapter 13D requires that meetings of governmental bodies generally be open to the public in order to: • Prohibit actions being taken at a secret meeting where it is impossible for the interested public to become fully informed about a public board's decisions or to detect improper influences • Assure the public's right to be informed and observe public meetings The Minnesota Supreme Court has noted that meetings of less than a quorum of a public body held serially to avoid a public meeting or to fashion agreement on an issue of public business may violate the open meeting law. Gift/Donations Gifts from Interested Persons: Unless as outlined in exceptions, per MN Statute 471.895 councilmembers may not receive gifts from any "interested person" in conjunction with their city council duties: • A "gift" is defined as money, real or personal property, a service, loan, a forbearance or forgiveness of debt, or a promise of future employment, that is given and received without the giver receiving something of equal or greater value in return • "Interested person" means a person or a representative of a person or association that has a direct financial interest in a decision that a local official is authorized to make o virtually every resident or person doing business in the city could have a direct financial interest in a decision Gifts to the city: councilmembers can recommend acceptance of general gifts through the city's donation policy. All gifts to the city must be accepted by city council resolution. Logo Members shall not use the city's name or logo for the purpose of endorsing any political candidate or business. Conflict of Interest Conflict of interest is when any member who has a "financial interest" in, or who may receive a financial benefit as a result of, any action or if there is potential for the appearance of conflict of interest. Questions about a potential conflict of interest shall be discussed with the city manager. Contractual Conflict of Interest: Per MN Statute 471.87, with exceptions in MN Statutes 1236.195 and 471.88, a public officer who is authorized to take part in any manner in making any sale, lease, or contract in official capacity shall not voluntarily have a personal financial interest in that sale, lease, or contract or personally benefit financially therefrom. Non -Contractual Conflict of Interest: Non -contractual matters may include such things as council decisions on zoning, local improvements, and the issuance of licenses. Although not generally prohibited by state law, an interested councilmember most likely should abstain from participating in council discussion and from voting on these issues. Members who have a potential conflict of interest shall: • Disclose the conflict of interest to the group, and • Abstain from the council discussion debate and vote ROLES OF COUNCIL, STAFF AND COMMISSIONS We are all part of a team committed to the residents of Blaine both today and in the future. To be effective we must come to meetings with an open mind, think strategically about city issues and delegate details of implementations to staff. We will strive to maintain a culture of trust, respect and candor as a council and when working with staff and boards/commissions. Decide Strategy h Manage Operations, Advise Council (technical analysis & evaluation) & Implement Policy City Council City Manager and Staff Make policy -level decisions Hire and supervise city manager Approve budget and related work plan Ordinances and policy decisions Development proposals Variances and rezoning requests Appoint representatives to advisory boards and commissions Respectful Behavior Members should STRIVE TO: Advise Council (community needs & values) Provide best efforts and technical advice to council Manage operations and staff Propose budget and policies Carry out council decisions Deliverservices Equitably enforce codes/policies Treat people with courtesy, politeness, and kindness Encourage others to express their opinions and ideas Listen to what others have to say Use the ideas of others to improve decisions and outcomes Recognize and respect differences Prepare for the issues at hand Focus on the business of the body Consider only legally germane information in decisions Act as a decision maker, not an advocate Boards, Commissions, Task Forces Provide community perspective Propose work plan items Advise the council through work plan "charges" Hold hearings as directed by council Assist as directed in work plan with engagement efforts Members should AVOID: • Speaking over or cutting off another individual's comments • Insulting, disparaging, or putting down people ortheir ideas • Bullying other members by displaying a pattern of belittling, demeaning, judging or patronizing comments • Violence or the threat of violence will not be tolerated WORKING WITH CITY STAFF Members shall respect and adhere to the council-manager structure of Blaine city government. This means: City Council does... Hire, fire, and supervise city manager Set the strategic direction for the city • Consider and approve budget and related work plan, and monitor• performance relative to those items Consider and approve policy decisions • Consider and approve development proposals • Consider and approve variances and rezoning requests • Appoint citizens to citizen advisory boards and commissions Approve and amend work plans and bylaws City Council does not... Hire and fire staff Direct activities of staff other than city manager Individually direct activities of boards, commissions or other resident groups Individually approve policies, projects etc. Individually commit resources or staff to specific causes Individually enforce policies, city code, etc. or speak or prepare official correspondence on behalf of the city unless authorized by council 4 Councilmembers promise city staff they will: • Respect staff as valued resources and members of our team • Support the maintenance of a positive and constructive workplace environment for city employees where individual members, staff and the public are free to express their ideas and work to their full potential • Provide direction to the city manager as a body and not direct the work of individual staff • Encourage staff to focus on the big picture in reports • When possible, notify the city manager in advance of a council meeting of questions or requests to pull agenda items from the consent agenda so the appropriate staff can compile the information needed • Agree that information they ask of the city manager will be shared equally with all councilmembers • Copy the city manager on all communications with staff, including questions on topics such as agenda items WORKING WITH BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS As set forth in the Blaine City Charter Chapter 2, Section 2.02, Blaine's boards and commissions are established by the council and serve as advisory to the council. Specific board and commission roles are: • Investigate matters within the scope of the commission or as specifically directed by the council • Advise the council by communicating the viewpoint or advice of the commission • At the direction of council, hold hearings, receive evidence, conduct investigations, and, based on such hearings, evidence and investigations, make decisions and recommendations to the council Councilmembers promise boards and commissions they will: • View boards and commissions as vitally important resources to support our decision -making • Communicate effectively with boards and commissions to ensure they have the tools to do their work • Give clear direction as a body and take adequate time to review the result of their deliberations • Because of the value of the independent advice of boards, commissions, and task forces to the public decision -making process, members of council shall refrain from using their position to influence the deliberations or outcomes of board, commission, and task force proceedings • The expectation is that councilmembers will not typically attend board, commission, committee, working group or task force meetings. However, under special circumstances, if we attend a meeting: o We will do so only as an observer and prior to attending will notify the appropriate staff liaison o Strive for good communication by reporting out to other councilmembers WORKING WITH THE COMMUNITY Residents: City staff is the first call for help for residents. We will refer residents who have concerns to the city manager. If a resident has contacted the city manager but is still not satisfied, we will discuss with the city manager. We acknowledge if a resident receives conflicting information from different councilmembers or staff that is difficult for the resident and could increase liability for the city. Businesses or other interests: The purpose of a city council meeting is to discuss information needed to make an informed decision, review that information, and decide. It is not feasible to conduct all business in a public meeting. Particularly around development, business interests might ask a member to meet outside of the city council meeting to facilitate idea generation about proposals. The city council's overarching principles for working the community are: • Never grant any special consideration, treatment, or advantage • Respect sensitivity of personal information • Honor our rules regarding public testimony and clearly communicate the rules • Make ourselves available to all parties on an equal basis and not advocate for a certain point of view • Be cautious about how we participate in meetings or events and not prejudge the issue before the council has had a chance to deliberate CITY STAFF AND THE PUBLIC Public decision -making must be fair and impartial and shall not be discriminatory on the basis of those protected classes outlined in federal, state, and city laws and ordinances. City policy dictates that elected officials and advisory board members conduct business in a manner which, both internally and in relation to each other and their constituencies, is free from illegal discrimination based on race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, marital status, socio-economic status, or sexual orientation. Meetings requested by residents or businesses: 1. AFTER DECISION: If we are invited to a meeting about an issue the council has decided upon, we will explain how the council arrived at the decision. 2. DURING DECISION: If we are invited to a meeting about an issue that will be before the council in the future, we will uphold the above principles for working with the community, and: a. We will not make our decision about an issue before the city council until the process allows. b. We will be sensitive to the fact that we are not hearing everyone, and we will give equal consideration to all feedback regardless of the way it is received. 3. DURING SPECIFIED ENGAGEMENT PROCESS: If we meet with a resident during a planned engagement process, we will notify the resident that we are there to listen and encourage them to participate through the established process to engage. We will ensure that staff received the feedback provided to us. 4. OTHER ENGAGEMENT OPPORTUNITIES: Engagement opportunities outside of formal council meetings are often an effective and meaningful way to connect with residents in a less formal manner, such as meeting with one or two residents about a topic, meeting with a few business owners in an area, or holding a listening session for a small portion of a neighborhood. The goal of these smaller engagement opportunities is to provide one or two councilmembers the opportunity to engage with constituents in a smaller group setting, different than larger, staff -supported events such as an open house or broader neighborhood meeting, that may be subject to the open meeting law. These opportunities should be considered as listening sessions for feedback on a topic that the councilmember(s) then relay to the full council as part of formal consideration. Should a councilmember like to host an engagement opportunity, they should: • Inform the city manager to allow staff time if needed to notify about the opportunity, ensuring equal access for all and ensuring that all regulatory and open meeting law requirements are met. • Inform their fellow councilmembers that an engagement opportunity will be taking place. Councilmembers should use these opportunities to: • Listen to constituents' concerns and ideas. • Encourage residents to attend council meetings and participate in the public decision -making process. • Collaborate with the city manager to ensure that constituents' concerns and ideas are addressed through staff and in accordance with established policies and procedures. Councilmembers should avoid: • Making promises or commitments on behalf of the council or city. • Discussing confidential, private, or non-public sensitive information and redirect conversations to the appropriate public forum(s). • Directing staff or making specific requests outside of the established protocol (i.e., via the city manager). • Councilmembers should keep a separation between their official duties and any campaign/re-election N. activities. 5. We will also notify the city manager in the event we wish to attend board/commission meetings as well as legislative committee meetings/hearings so staff can notify the chair(s) and/or lobbyists in order to be best prepared. By following these guidelines, councilmembers can effectively engage with the public outside of formal council meetings while maintaining transparency, upholding ethical responsibilities and encouraging active participation in the local government decision -making process. COUNCIL CONDUCT WITH CITY STAFF Direction to Staff for Projects/Agenda Items - Direction is given to city staff to pursue items that generally impact the public policy of the city by reaching consensus during a workshop or through a direct binding majority vote of the council at a special or regular business meeting. This direction can occur either through a workshop item agenda form with general consensus of the council or under other business on the regular business agenda through a motion/second and majority vote. Once direction is given, the city manager will assign the work to a staff member or advise the council that additional staffing will be needed to carry out the task. City staff, including the direct employees of the council (the city manager and city attorney), are not obligated to pursue items for only one councilmember. If a councilmember wishes to direct staff to work on a specific item, the councilmember must receive consent of the council by reaching consensus during a workshop meeting, by a majority vote of approval, or by submitting a workshop item agenda form that results in consensus of the council. Requests for Information on Non -Agenda Items - City staff carry out the day-to-day business of operating the city. The council should keep this in mind when requesting information or asking to perform these functions. Generally, all interactions with staff members should flow through the city manager. If a councilmember is asking for information from city staff that will require more than 30 minutes of staff time to collect or research a problem and prepare a response, the request will need to be approved by the council to ensure that staff resources are allocated in accordance with overall council priorities. Interaction with Staff - It is not appropriate for councilmembers to admonish city staff when disagreeing with the information brought forth for presentation to the governing body. Concerns should be taken up with the city manager, and if an issue is identified that needs to be addressed by the whole council, it will be brought forth accordingly. In any event, there shall be no personal attacks on city staff. COUNCIL CONDUCT WITH THE PUBLIC Public Meetings - Making the public feel welcome is an important part of the democratic process. Recognizing that the actions of each council member impact the public perception of the whole council, councilmembers shall strive to treat the public with respect. Connecting Residents with Staff Resources - Councilmembers serve as the link between residents and their local government. Through various channels such as mail, telephone, face-to-face interactions, and electronic means, council facilitates a crucial two-way exchange of information. On one hand, councilmembers are often the first point of contact for residents who wish to express concerns, seek assistance or provide recommendations for policy; therefore, it is essential that councilmembers handle these interactions with tact and professionalism to maintain positive relationships and foster citizen support for the government. On the other hand, councilmembers also play a key role in disseminating information about city programs and policies to the public. By educating residents about local government and the rationale behind city policies, councilmembers can help build understanding and support for city initiatives. In day-to-day community interactions, councilmembers need not act as intermediaries between city staff and community members when advocating for a community issue brought directly to the councilmember. Councilmembers should connect community members to the appropriate city resources when contacted about various issues by reaching out to the city manager and appropriate department heads and requesting follow-up as needed. The city manager and appropriate department heads shall address the issue or delegate it to the appropriate staff for follow-up. Further follow-up with the councilmember by the city manager and appropriate department heads for informational purposes may occur if necessary. Councilmembers' Behavior and Conduct: Councilmembers who violates the code of conduct are subject to admonition, reprimand, or censure. Any violations that potentially constitute criminal conduct shall be handled by the criminal justice system. Accountability/Consequences: A potential action for failing to comply with this code of conduct may include the following: 1. Admonition. An admonition shall be verbal or written statement made by the mayor to the councilmember. 2. Reprimand. A reprimand shall be administered to the councilmember by letter. The letter shall be approved by the city council and shall be signed by the mayor, or by the mayor pro tem if the mayor position is vacant or if the matter involves the mayor. 3. Censure. A censure shall be administered pursuant to a formal resolution adopted by the council. A member may receive a public admonishment for failure to conform with any provisions of these bylaws, state statute, violation of confidentiality or attorney -client privilege, or other acts considered to merit reprimand by the city council. Such censure may include other actions or punishments by city council in conformity of the law. The city council, as a body, may by motion and a supermajority, commend or censure one of its own. If the act involves two members of the council, a majority vote is required. Factors that will be considered in determining the appropriate consequence include but are not limited to the seriousness of the violation and/or the number of preceding violations. Procedures for reporting: 1. A member of the city council may report a potential code of conduct violation by a member of the council by bringing the matter to the attention of the mayor, city manager, or city attorney. 2. A city staff member may report a potential code of conduct violation by a member of the council by bringing the matter to the attention of the city manager or human resources manager. 3. If the potential violation involves the mayor, it should be brought to the attention of the mayor pro tem, city manager or city attorney. 4. If the mayor and/or mayor pro tem are unable to be involved in reviewing the code of conduct complaint for any reason, the matter will be reviewed by the next most senior member of the council not involved in the complaint. 5. Upon receipt of a complaint, the following diagram highlights the process that will be used: Reporting and Addressing Possible Code of Conduct Violations How to report Triage Fact -Finding Possible Consequences INTERNAL COUNCIL CONDUCT The council exists to work in the interest of the public. The council should strive to work as a team in achieving the best outcome for the community. The council should conduct business in a civil, efficient, and cooperative manner with other members of the council and city staff. It is incumbent upon the members of council to listen to one another and give full opportunity for all viewpoints to be heard. All disagreements should be handled in a civil fashion. Inappropriate behavior by a councilmember such as intentionally or with malice sharing false statements during a council meeting may be addressed through a verbal correction by the mayor/mayor pro tem either during or outside of the council meeting. Further incidents may be addressed by subsequent verbal corrections accompanied by use of the gavel. Repeated incidents can give rise to the mayor/mayor pro tem not recognizing the offending councilmember to speak. A councilmember can request that any of these actions against an offending councilmember be taken if the mayor/mayor pro tem has not done so on their own. Councilmembers must act in a respectful, courteous and professional manner while acting in their roles as elected officials. Councilmembers are entitled to disagree regarding city direction and decisions relating to regulations, policies and positions, but councilmembers may not use their titles as mayor/councilmember or any city -sponsored means of communication (e.g.: city -issued email, social media posts, etc.) to disparage other members, council decisions, city staff or any city -related issues. Personal attacks against staff, other councilmembers, or members of the public by a councilmember without basis is a violation of the Rules of Order and Procedure and the Council Code of Conduct. Councilmembers acknowledge they are elected to be one member of a decision -making body and at times members may disagree with the approved decisions of a majority of the council. While councilmembers may respectfully disagree with decisions made by the majority, members should not publicly disparage or undermine approved council decisions in any manner that may be detrimental to the city carrying out such decisions and acting as directed by a majority of the council. INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS Members shall represent positions approved by the council to the best of their ability when working with: • Legislative bodies • Federal or state agencies • Other local governments, such as school boards, counties, or municipalities If an individual councilmember's opinion differs from the city position, or a matter agreed upon by the full council, members shall explicitly state they do not represent their city councilor the City of Blaine, nor will they allow the inference that they do. Members will represent the official policies or positions of the city as set forth in the city charter, city ordinances, and the motions and resolutions adopted by a majority of the city council to the best of their abilities. When presenting their individual opinions and positions that differ from the official policies or positions of the city, members must explicitly state they are speaking in their personal capacity and do not represent the position of the city or the council. 1( Blaine City Council Code of Conduct Acknowledgement ✓ I acknowledge that I have received a copy of the Blaine City Council Code of Conduct. ✓ I understand that I am responsible for familiarizing myself and complying with the Code. ✓ I understand that if I need clarification of the contents within the Code, I will contact the City Manager or City Attorney. Name (print) Signature Date AGENDA ITEMS - 3E 75 Ycars MEMORANDUM DATE: August 10, 2026 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Jessica Jagoe, City Administrator SUBJECT: Immigration Enforcement Discussion Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount N/A Council Should Consider N/A Funding Source: N/A Council should discuss the topic area below and provide direction to Staff on next steps. Background At the February 9th Work Session, the City Council requested a recurring work session agenda item to allow for discussion on topics related to immigration enforcement. Subsequently at the July 13th Work Session, Staff received feedback and direction from Council on the draft ordinance language for Use of City Property. A draft ordinance will be brought forward to a future regular meeting for adoption. Below is the remaining topic that Council requested be brought back for discussion by the City Council related to immigration enforcement. Sharing of Data and Access to City Buildings PolicX o Based on City Council direction at the March 9th and May 11th Work Sessions, staff will be preparing a policy that will be brought forward to a future work session for consideration. Additionally, Council may discuss any particular topic(s) that should be brought forward under this agenda item for future discussion. Budget Impact N/A Attachment N/A Page 1 of 1 AGENDA ITEM - 3F MEMORANDUM DATE: August 10, 2026 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Jessica Jagoe, City Administrator SUBJECT: Rice Creek Commons/TCAAP Discussion Budgeted Amount: N/A For Council Consideration Actual Amount: N/A Funding Source: N/A Council will have the opportunity to comment on any TCAAP related items they so choose. Background N/A Budget Impact N/A Attachment N/A Page 1 of 1 AGENDA ITEM - 3G MEMORANDUM DATE: August 10, 2026 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Jessica Jagoe, City Administrator SUBJECT: Agenda Planning Budgeted Amount: Actual Amount: Funding Source: N/A N/A N/A Council Should Consider Council should discuss its next Work Session agenda. Background Per Council's adopted policy on agenda setting, please find the proposed agenda below for the upcoming meeting. August 241h Work Session • Zoning Code Updates • Arden Hills Community Event • Staffing Study Discussion • Immigration Discussion • Agenda Planning (time sensitive) • RCC/TCAAP Discussion September 141h Work Session • 2027 Operating Budget Discussion • Immigration Discussion • Agenda Planning (time sensitive) • RCC/TCAAP Discussion Attachment A is the list of topics that have yet to be discussed by Council and the ranking of priority topics. Staff will begin to work on the higher priority items into upcoming Work Sessions sooner while putting the lower priority items to later discussions. Please note, this does Page 1 of 2 not reflect all items at Work Sessions as Staff will have necessary items for discussion, such as, budget discussions, concept plan reviews, or Public Works projects that need timely direction. Council may want to discuss whether any items need to be added to this list for future discussion or assign a future meeting for some of these items. This would need to be done by a majority consensus of Council. Below is a running list of things Staff brings forward to Work Session annually, in recent years, we have shifted away from bringing some items forward unless needed, such as, the Pavement Management Update from Public Works. Note, these timelines may shift year to year. Most items discussed at Work Sessions are one-off items that may require multiple meetings but are usually not recurring. • January o Legislative priorities • February o None • March o Initial guidance on current year Public Works projects • April o None • May o None • June o None • July o Capital improvement planning • August o Operating budgets • September o Operating budget and levy discussion o Committee/Commission Work Plans • October o None • November o City-wide budget and fee schedule o Follow up on next year's Public Works projects • December o Committee and commission appointments Budget Impact N/A AttarhmPnt Attachment A: Council Priorities Attachment B: Agenda Setting Policy Page 2 of 2 Attachment A Topic for Consideration Short-term Rental Ordinance Likely Responsible Department CD/Admin Total 15 Average 3.00 Majority Next Steps Council WS Rental Licensing Program CD/Admin 15 3.00 Council WS Funding for Lake Johanna Boulevard Trail PW/Fin 9 1.80 Council WS Climate Action Plan Admin 9 1.80 Council WS Code of Conduct Admin 81 1.60 Council WS Encroachment Discussion (2025)/Adopt A Spot PW 8 1.60 Staff Recommendation Cannabis Discussion CD/Admin 8 1.60 Council WS Energy Audit Admin 7 1.40 Staff Recommendation Temporary Goats/Buckthorn Admin 71 1.40 Staff Recommendation Buy Nothing Day/Clean Up Day Admin 6 1.20 Staff Recommendation Community Survey Admin 6 1.20 Council WS Committee/Commission Liaison Role Policy Admin 5 1.00 Council WS EV Fleet Analysis pW 5 1.00 Staff Recommendation Added Items: Data Center Moratorium Lake Johanna Cold Plunge Sponsorship Policy E-Bike Regulations Tree Removal Enforcement Perry Park Attachment B It EN HILLS CITY OF ARDEN HILLS Agenda Setting Policy The purpose of this policy is to establish a method for agenda setting that allows for Council to review and have control over its agendas and decide as a Council how it wants items for consideration to be brought forward. For regular worksession agendas: • Prior to concluding each regularly scheduled worksession, the City Council shall review its next regularly scheduled worksession agenda and direct Staff on any changes. • Should an individual Councilmember want to raise an item for discussion at the next meeting or in the future, they would do so during this review period. The item would need at least one other Councilmember to agree to having the item considered for future discussion, and then Council, by majority, would direct to have it placed on a future agenda or not. Staff will have flexibility to add or remove items to the worksession as needed to maintain operational efficacy. For regular City Council meeting agendas: • Agendas will be largely Staff driven based on approvals needed for normal operations. • Items coming from the City Council shall first be discussed at a worksession and can direct Staff at said worksession to bring items forward for formal approval if needed. • In rare instances, if a Councilmember brings forward an item that needs approval prior to going to a worksession, they may request the City Administrator add the item to the agenda. The City Administrator shall have the discretion to determine if the issue should be added or not, but Councilmembers will make every effort to having the item first discussed at a worksession. Special meetings and emergency meetings: • Special meetings and emergency meetings may still be called at the discretion of the Mayor or any two Councilmembers, and the members calling the meeting shall set the agenda.