HomeMy WebLinkAboutCCP 10-15-2002
Mayor
Dennis Probst
ounciJ Members
Beverly Aplikowski
David Grant
Gregg Larson
Lois Rem
~
~HILLS
Arden Hills City Council
SPECIAL MEETING
TUESDAY
OCTOBER 15, 2002
1245 W. Highway 96
Arden Hills, Minnesota
55112
651.634.5120
City Philosophy
To provide a basic and necessary scope of quality services through the innovative and purposeful use of resources.
Economic Development AuthorittiEDA)
6:30 p.m. - 7:00 p.m.
CANCELLED
File Copy
~
~HILLS
Arden Hills City Council
Amended REGULAR
Tuesda , October 15, 2002
City Philosophy
of uali services thro h the innovative and
Mayor
Dennis Probst
ouneit Members
Beverly Aplikowski
David Grant
Gregg Larson
Lois Rem
To rovide a basic and necess
1245 W. Highway 96
Arden Hills, Minnesota
55112
651.634.5120
oseful use of resources.
Agenda
City Council Meeting Convenes 7:00 PM
Call to Order
1. AGENDA
2. MINUTES
A. September 30, 2002 COImcil Meeting
3. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Claims and Payroll
B. 2002 1st Payment: 2002 PMP Hunters
CourtlWaldon Place: T.S. Schifsky
C. 2002 1st Payment: Sewer and Watermain
Rehabilitation Project: Visu-Sewer Clean
& Seal
D. 2002 1 st Payment: Storm Drainage
Improvements: Dryden Excavating
E. Resolution No. 02-52: Authorizing
Application for Recycling SCORE Grant
Funds for 2003
F. Resolution No. 02-53: Establishing
Service Fee Charge for 2003 Residential
Curbside Recycling Program
G. Resolution No. 02-54: A Resolution
Approving an Application for
Authorization for an Exempt Gambling
Permit to Trinity Lutheran Church
4. PUBLIC INQUIRlESIINFORMATIONAL
7:00
Those items listed under the Consent Calendar are
considered to be routine by the City Council and will be
enacted by one motion under a Consent Calendar format.
There will be no separate discussion of these items,
unless a Council Member so requests, in which event, the
item will be removed from the general order of business
and considered separately in its normal sequence on the
agenda.
Public InquirieslInformatlonal is an opportunity for
citizens to bring to the Council's attention any items not
currently on the agenda. In addressing the Council,
please state your name and address for the record, and a
brief summary of the specific item being addressed to the
Council. To allowadeqnate time for each person wishing
to address the Council, we ask that individnals limit their
conunents to three (3) minutes. Written documents may
be distributed to the Council prior to the meeting, or as
bench copies, to allow a more timely presentation.
Arden Hills City Council Agenda
October 15,2002
Page 2
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS NONE
6. CO~~TYSERVICES
Aaron Parrish
A. Fireworks Ordinance No. 342
B. TCAAP - Update Aaron Parrish
7. OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE Tom Moore
8. ADMINISTRATION Joe Lynch
A. Personnel: Appointment of Sandra Byl to
Regular Part-Time Status
B. Discussion: TCAAP Advisory Panel
C. Metropolitan Council Redistricting
Proposal
D. Livable Communities Grant - Metropolitan
Council
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
A. Council Member Grant
B. Council Member Larson
C. Council Member Aplikowski
D. Council Member Rem
E. Mayor Probst
TCAAP: Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant
PMP: Pavement Management Plan
PTRC: Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee
MFTF: Maintenance Facility Task Force (Ramsey County/Arden Hills)
~
~~HlLLS
Arden Hills City Council
REGULAR
Tuesda , October 15, 2002
City Philosophy
To rovide a basic and necessary seoe of uali services thrall h the innovative and
Mayor
Dennis Probst
Conncil Members
Beverly Aplikowski
David Grant
Gregg Larson
Lois Rem
1245 W. Highway 96
Arden Hills, Minnesota
55112
651.634.5120
sefid use of resources.
Agenda
City Council Meeting Convenes 7:00 PM
Call to Order
1. AGENDA
2. MINUTES
A. September 30, 2002 Council Meeting
3. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Claims and Payroll
B. 2002 1'1 Payment: 2002 PMP Hunters
Court/Waldon Place: T.S. Schifsky
C. 2002 I" Payment: Sewer and Watermain
Rehabilitation Project: Visu-Sewer Clean
& Seal
D. 2002 I" Payment: Storm Drainage
Improvements: Dryden Excavating
E. Resolution No. 02-52: Authorizing
Application for Recycling SCORE Grant
Funds for 2003
F. Resolution No. 02-53: Establishing
Service Fee Charge for 2003 Residential
Curbside Recycling Program
G. Resolution No. 02-54: A Resolution
Approving an Application for
Authorization for an Exempt Gambling
Permit to Trinity Lutheran Church
4. PUBLIC INQUlRIESIINFORMATlONAL
A. Resolution No. 02-55: Appreciation to
David Sand
7:00
Those items listed under the Consent Calendar are
considered to be routine by the City Council and will be
enacted by one motion under a Consent Calendar format.
There will be no separate discussion of these items,
unless a COWlcil Member so requests, in which event, the
item will be removed from the general order of business
and considered separately in its normal sequence on the
agenda.
Public InquirieslInformational is an opportunity for
citizens to bring to the COWlcil' s attention any items not
currently on the agenda. In addressing the Council,
please state your name and address for the record, and a
brief summary of the specific item being addressed to the
Council. To allow adequate time for each person wishing
to address the Council, we ask that individuals limit their
comments to three (3) minutes. Written documents may
be distributed to the Council prior to the meeting, or as
bench copies, to allow a more timely presentation.
Arden Hills City Council Agenda
October 15, 2002
Page 2
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
6. COMMUNITY SERVICES
NONE
A. Fireworks Ordinance No. 342
Aaron Parrish
B. TCAAP - Update
Aaron Parrish
7. OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE
8. ADMINISTRATION
Tom Moore
Joe Lynch
A. Personnel: Appointment of Sandra Byl to
Regular Part-Time Status
B. Discussion: TCAAP Advisory Panel
C. Metropolitan Council Redistricting
Proposal
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
A. Council Member Grant
B. Council Member Larson
C. Council Member Aplikowski
D. Council Member Rem
E. Mayor Probst
TCAAP: Twin Cities Anny Ammunition Plant
PMP: Pavement Management Plan
PTRC: Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee
MFTF: Maintenance Facility TaskForce (Ramsey County/Arden Hills)
,
.
.
.
~
~HILLS
MEETING MINUTES
Draft
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 30,2002,7:00 P.M.
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 1245 WEST HIGHWAY 96
CALL TO ORDEWROLL CALL
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Dennis Probst called to order
the regular City Council meeting at 7:32 p.rn.
Present:
Mayor Dennis Probst, Council Members Beverly Aplikowski,
David Grant, and Lois Rem.
Absent:
CouncilMember Gregg Larson.
Also present were City Adffiinistrator, Joe Lynch; CityAttomey, Jerry Filla;
Director of Community Services, Aaron Parrish; City Planner, Peter
Rellegers; Director of Operations and Maintenance, Thomas Moore; City
Engineer, Greg Brown; and Recording Secretary, Kathleen Altman.
1. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA
MOTION: Council Member Aplikowski moved and Council Member Rem
seconded a motion to adopt the agenda for the September 30, 2002,
regular City Council meeting. The motion carried unanimously (4-0).
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. September 9, 2002 Council Meeting
B. September 16,2002 Council Work Session
Council Member Grant requested the following changes: Page 10, September 9,
2002, City Council Meeting Minutes under number 3 Motion, remove the
reference to the first reference to Grant.
ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 30, 2002
,
2
.
Council Member Aplikowski requested the following changes: None
Council Member Rem requested the following changes: Page II, SeptembeT 9,
2002 City Council Meeting Minutes, under the TCAAP update, last sentence,
change Toomey to Toohey.
Mayor Probst requested the following changes: Page 5, September 16,2002 City
Council Work Session Minutes, delete the first sentence which reads: Mayor
Probst Mayor said he saw the previous discussion item as a segway to this
discussion item.
MOTION: Council Member Aplikowski moved and Council Member Rem
seconded a motion to approve the September 9, 2002 Council
Meeting Minutes and September 16, 2002 Council Work Session
Minutes as amended. The motion carried unanimously (4-0).
3.
CONSENT CALENDAR
.
a. Claims and Payroll
b. Resolution No. 02-47: Approving the 2002 General Election Judges
c. Resolution No. 02 18: }lPproying llmended 2002 Fee Schedule (False
Alann Fee) Moved to Item 6.A.5.
d. Resolution No. 02-50: Ordering the Feasibility Study for the 2003
Pavement Management Program (PMP)
Council Member Aplikowski requested Item 3.C be moved to 6.A.5.
MOTION: Council Member Aplikowski moved and Council Member Grant
seconded a motion to approve the Consent Calendar as amended and
authorize execution of all necessary documents contained therein.
The motion carried unanimously (4-0).
4. PUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL
None. .
,
ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 30, 2002
3
.
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
None.
6. COMMUNITY SERVICES
A. PLANNING
1. Planning Case No. 02-20: Aaron Nelson, Master and Final Plan PUD
Amendment, County Road D and Cleveland Avenue
Mr. Parrish explained the applicant was requesting an amendment to a previously
approved Master and Final Planned Unit Development to construct an office
building at the comer of County Road D and Cleveland Avenue. He stated the
Planning Commission recommended approval with conditions as outlined in the
staffs report dated September 25,2002.
. Mayor Probst expressed disappointment that this was back before the Council and
stated he was not in support of this proposal.
Council Member Grant stated he understood the developer was trying to come up
with the best possible development, but the developer should realize they needed
to meet the building material standards and stated he was not in support of this
design.
Council Member Rem agreed with many of the comments made by the Planning
Commission. She expressed concerns about screening. She stated she was not in
favor of this proposal.
Council Member Aplikowski stated the whole scope changed from the first
presentation. She indicated the first building seemed a more friendly approach to
the neighborhood, and she did not believe this new proposal was as friendly to the
neighborhood. She stated she did not agree with the building materials being
proposed for this new building.
.
Steve Nelson, stated they made the building larger due to more interest from the
tenants, but also because of structural issues. He indicated the footprint was
actually smaller, however. He stated part of the problem was the stairwell. He
ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 30, 2002
,
4
.
indicated there was only one office more on the north side because the stairwell
took up a portion of this. He stated they had cut back on the decks. He noted the
material they chose was compatible to other buildings in various communities. He
stated the actual amount of usable square footage was not that much greater
because of the common area. He indicated they had problems with separation for
fire purposes. With respect to material, he stated there were many different grades
of material and stucco was a very attractive material if done right. With respect to
the decks, he anticipated they would not be used on any regular basis. He stated
there would be no sliding doors to the decks. With respect to screening, they
attempted to provide adequate screening by using spruce trees as well as a fence.
He noted coniferous trees would not work where suggested because that was
where they intended to pile the snow until it was removed. He noted coniferous
trees would die if snow was put along their bottom. He indicated there were
problems with the first building proposal with respect to structuring that building.
He stated this new building proposal was actually a foot lower than the previous
building that as approved. He stated this building would allow leasing of
anywhere from 1,000 to 4,000 square feet to the tenants, but the basement would
actually be smaller. He stated this building would be very attractive and they had
interest from dentists, accountants, attorneys, as well as other businesses that
would service the community.
.
Mark McGuire, 2030 Glen Paul Avenue, presented a letter to the Council
summing up the views of all of the adjacent neighbors. He stated the following
neighbors were opposed to this proposal: Ruth McGuire, 2030 Glen Paul Avenue;
Monte and Bonnie Arhard, 2014 Glen Paul Avenue; Don and Melanie Ristow,
2033 County Road D; and Kim Luger, 2026 Glen Paul Avenue. He expressed
concern about the zoning of the area and stated they needed to take into
consideration what the neighbors wanted. He expressed concern about the buffer
yard and the accommodation for parking. He expressed concern about the
oversized building on this lot. He stated the building was not attractive. He
expressed concern about the decks intruding on the neighbors' privacy. He
expressed concern about the screening. He requested the City enforce the Zoning
Ordinances. He expressed concern about their property values. He stated the
neighbors would not be taken advantage of by businesses or anyone else trying to
exploit the neighborhood business district zoning ordinances. He stated the
neighbors were in support of some type of a development on that property, but
they wanted the City to follow the Zoning Ordinances. He stated the neighbors
did not want the proposed building to be oversized. He stated the adjacent homes
.
ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 30, 2002
5
.
were one-story ramblers. He stated they wanted more screening provided,
especially if the building was going to be larger. He indicated they wanted the
new building to blend in with the surrounding homes and to make sure there was
proper landscape screening for adjacent neighbors. He stated there would be very
little screening to the north. He indicated the proposed river birch trees provided
very little screening in the winter, they were slow growing, and a landscape design
engineer, or the Minnesota Horticultural Society did not recommend them. He
stated pyramidal arborvitae would provide screening and thrive in moist or wet
fertile soil. He noted they wanted the trash moved over to the other side to prevent
odors to the adjacent neighbors. He stated Mr. Nelson had not contacted any of
the neighbors for their input. He indicated the neighbors felt they had not been
told the whole story by the applicant with respect to the fence location and trees
not being able to grow along the north property lines. He expressed concern about
snow removal on the site. He stated Mr. Nelson had not met the requirements
made by the Planning Commission with respect to the landscaping. He stated they
needed to do what was right and not be caught up by the promises of a new
development.
.
Kim Luger, 2026 Glen Paul Avenue, expressed disappointment with the original
plans that were approved. She stated with the new proposal, there was no
buffering and therefore no privacy. She stated she strongly opposed this because
of the buffer zone going from 30 to 15 feet. She stated the proposed building
would be closer to her property line. She stated she needed more landscaping
along her property line. She expressed concern about the decks and balconies and
asked why they were needed. She requested no outside decks on the second story.
She stated she agreed with all of the concerns raised by Mr. McGuire. She
expressed concern about the location of the trash bins. She requested a ten-foot
fence, no outside decks, better screening, and relocation of the trash bins, which
would maintain the property value of her home.
Don Ristow, 2033 County Road D, expressed concern about his privacy, traffic
increase, and the location of the proposed parking ramp in relation to this home.
He expressed concern about the destruction of the existing trees. He expressed
concern about the decks on the building. He stated if this would remain a one-
story building, they would still be able to retain many of the trees and this would
. provide adequate screening.
ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 30, 2002
6
.
Duncan Clyborne, 1850 Glen Paul Avenue, stated he did not believe this
development was appropriate for this lot and requested the City follow their
zoning ordinances.
Mr. Nelson, noted two story homes could be built five feet off the property line,
and if they sold this to a developer that built three homes on that lot, those homes
would impact the neighbors a lot more than this building proposal. He stated the
reason a fence would not work on top of a retaining wall was because they would
have no room for snow removal. He noted the decks were intended for visual
purposes only. He noted the neighbors knew there would be a commercial
development on that lot and this proposal should not come as any surprise to them.
He noted the existing neighbors already had buffering because of the location of
their garages.
Council Member Aplikowski asked what the total height of the building being
proposed was. Mr. Nelson replied it would be 33 feet.
Council Member Aplikowski asked how high the peaks of the homes in the
neighborhood were. Mr. Nelson replied the average height was approximately 20
feet.
.
Mr. Nelson stated he would be willing to listen to further ideas from the Council
and staff. He agreed to table this issue for sixty days.
Mr. Filla noted the City could extend the deadline to sixty days only if they noted
the reason for the tabling.
Mr. Parrish noted the original plan was approved on December 10,2001 and if
nothing was done by that date, they would need to get an extension to that original
request.
Council Member Aplikowski stated a business in a neighborhood should be used
by the neighbors and she did not believe the neighbors would use the proposed
tenants. She asked if the neighbors and the developer could in any way reach any
type of a compromise. .
.
.
.
.
ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 30, 2002
7
Mrs. Osborn, 2020 Glen Paul Avenue, stated her business concern was the loss
of her privacy and the drainage problems she would have if there was a
development on this site.
MOTION: Council Member Grant moved and Council Member Aplikowski
seconded to table Planning Case No. 02-20: Aaron Nelson, Master
and Final Plan PUD Amendment, County Road D and Cleveland
A venue for sixty days. The reason for tabling is to provide the
applicant time to work with the residents to address the screening in
the neighborhood business district and what screening should be used
in this residential neighborhood. The motion carried unanimously (4-
0).
2. Planning Case No. 02-24: Zoning Text Amendment: Trinity Lutheran
Church
Mr. Parrish explained the applicants were requesting a Zoning Ordinance
Amendment that would allow music lessons as an accessory use for houses of
worship. He stated currently, the zoning ordinance considered music lessons a
studio use. He indicated studio uses were only allowed in the commercial zoning
districts. He stated the Planning Commission recommended approval of the
proposed ordinance revision.
Mayor Probst asked if this was specific to Trinity Lutheran or would it be a global
change. Mr. Parrish replied it would apply to all houses of worship.
MOTION: Council Member Grant moved and Council Member Aplikowski
seconded a motion to approve Planning Case No. 02-24: Zoning Text
Amendment: Trinity Lutheran Church. The motion carried
unanimously (4-0).
3. DRAFT Guidant AUAR
Mr. Parrish explained at the September 9,2002 City Council meeting, the Council
adopted a resolution directing Guidant to prepare an Alternative Urban Areawide
Review (AUAR) for their campus master plan. Subsequently, the AUAR
document had been developed by SRF and modified based on suggestions from
ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 30, 2002
8
.
City staff. He indicated staff recommended approval of the draft Alternative
Urban Areawide Review for the Guidant property.
Dawn Alexander, SRF Consulting, stated Guidant was currently working with
the City and County regarding mitigation, and before Guidant could move forward
with the other phases, this mitigation would need to be addressed.
Council Member Grant asked they reformat the document to indicate an issue did
not apply instead of just leaving the yes/no lines blank.
MOTION: Council Member Aplikowski moved and Council Member Grant
seconded a motion to approve the draft, Alternative Urban Areawide
Review for the Guidant property. The motion carried (4-0).
4. Resolution No. 02-49: Endorsing the 1-35 Build-Out Study
Mr. Parrish explained as a follow up to the presentation the Council heard at their
September 19 Work Session, this resolution endorsed the I-35W Corridor
Coalition's multi-year Build-Out Study.
.
Council Member Grant stated he appreciated what the I-35W Corridor Coalition
had done, but he could not support what was outlined in the Build-Out Study
because he felt that he did not believe what the study was stating would actually
happen. He stated this sounded good on the surface, but he did not believe it
would hold true.
Mayor Probst stated he did not understand Council Member Grant's concerns and
expressed disappointment by his lack of support. Council Member Grant replied
in the several meetings he had attended, the Coalition was concerned about the
smart growth and walk able neighborhoods, and while those principals were fine,
what was actually built did not necessary work and he did not believe this would
solve the transit problems.
Council Member Aplikowski expressed concern with number two, the amending
of the comprehensive plan for mixed use. She stated she would want a public
hearing on this. She expressed concern with the concept of mitigating and asked if .
walk able neighborhoods would really work. She requested they have more time
to look at this.
.
.
.
ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 30, 2002
9
Council Member Rem stated she did not realize when they heard the presentation
at Work Session that they would be moving towards approving this. She
expressed concern about endorsing this at this time because there were still
questions that needed answering. She stated by endorsing this, it appeared that
this was what they were expecting. She stated she did not have a problem with
this being presented as an option. She stated if they endorsed this, it would be
saying this was what was going to happen.
Mayor Probst stated he did not think this would handcuff the City as to their future
approach, and it was simply a guideline as to how the City could develop in the
future. He stated it was important to give the Advisory Panel some direction as to
what the City felt was important. He stated this endorsement would offer some
guidance for the Panel.
Council Member Aplikowski asked if this was a formula for TCAAP for the entire
City. Mayor Probst stated this would apply to future development and how they
would move ahead for future planning within the City.
Council Member Aplikowski stated she was not sure if they should or should not
be embracing this, but it concerned her that all of the people involved in this were
not Arden Hills residents. She asked if this needed to be addressed tonight. She
stated she would like resident input. Council Member Rem agreed.
MOTION: Council Member Grant moved and Council Member Aplikowski
seconded a motion to deny Resolution 02-49: Endorsing Principles
Outlined in the I-35W Corridor Coalition Build-Out Study.
Council Member Grant stated he could not support this as written.
Council Member Aplikowski stated she seconded this for discussion and she
believed they needed to discuss this further.
The motion failed (1-3). (Yea: Council Member Grant. Nays: Council Members
Rem, Aplikowski and Mayor Probst).
MOTION: Council Member Aplikowski moved and Council Member Rem
seconded a motion to table Resolution 02-49: Endorsing Principles
ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 30, 2002 10
.
Outlined in the I-35W Corridor Coalition Build-Out Study for sixty
days. The motion carried 3-1 (Mayor Probst).
5. Resolution No. 02-47: Approving the 2002 General Election Judges
Council Member Aplikowski stated she had received a request to hold the election
in the City Council Chambers. Mr. Lynch replied there was no reason they could
not use the Council Chambers, but they would need to move the staff areas and the
podium, and with all of the technology in the room, it would be more work to do it
in the Council Chambers. Mr. Lynch added the basement was easily accessible by
the elevator, but if the Council wanted the election in the Council Chambers it
could be held there.
MOTION: Council Member Aplikowski moved and Council Member Grant
seconded a motion to approve Resolution No. 02-47: Approving the
2002 General Election Judges. Motion carried unanimously (4-0).
B.
FINANCE
.
None.
C. TCAAP - Update
Mr. Parrish stated staff and project consultants were in the process of finalizing
letters to be sent to potential members of the Advisory Panel. He indicated
Representative McCollum facilitated a meeting on September 23 which focused
on a presentation by the General Services Administration. He stated the Ramsey
County Board had authorized the inclusion on the 49-acre wildlife corridor into
the existing 113-acre Rice Creek Corridor. He indicated the Rice Creek
Watershed District had included $30,000 in their budget for TCAAP planning
activities. He noted the Army and GSA were in the process of developing a scope
of services for a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment.
7. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE
None. .
8. ADMINISTRATION
ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 30, 2002 11
.
A. Resolution No. 02-51: Approving the Phase I Services Agreement with
Ramsey County for the Joint Maintenance Facility
Mr. Lynch presented the estimate for the Public Works Facility Operations and
Maintenance.
Jolly Mangine, Ramsey County, summarized the process they were going to
follow, the Arden Hills ownership interest, and the projected operating costs.
MOTION: Council Member Aplikowski moved and Council Member Grant
seconded a motion to approve Resolution 02-51: Approving the
Phase I Services Agreement with Ramsey County for the Joint
Maintenance Facility. The motion carried unanimously (4-0).
B. Appointment: Cynthia Y Iiung - Personnel Director/Deputy Clerk
. Mr. Lynch explained last month the Council adopted a change in the job
description for this position to Personnel Director/Deputy Clerk. He stated Ms.
Young had completed her six-month training period as the Personnel
Director/Deputy Clerk and per the City's policy, Ms. Young was evaluated at the
end of that period and her performance had been excellent. He recommended the
appointment of Ms. Young as Personnel Director/Deputy Clerk on a regular, full-
time basis.
MOTION: Council Member Aplikowski moved and Council Member Rem
seconded a motion to appoint Cynthia Young as the Personnel
Director/Deputy Clerk. The motion carried unanimously (4-0).
C. Livable Communities Contract
Mr. Lynch presented the Livable Communities Contract. Council Member Grant
requested this come back to the Council in the future for approval.
10. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
.
Council Member Grant had no comments.
ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 30, 2002 12
.
Council Member Aplikowski stated she had heard in the community that the City
was not following the Vento Use Plan and requested they be more public in that
they were following the Vento Plan.
Council Member Rem stated she had attended the Minnesota Human Rights
Commission meeting last week and had a packet of material if any Council
Member was interested in reviewing it. She stated the Newsletter Committee was
meeting this week and asked if the staff and/or the Council had any suggestions
for future articles.
Mayor Probst expressed condolences to the family of Brad Lemberg, a member of
the Planning Commission, who passed way last week. He also expressed
condolences to the family of John Buckley, a fonner City employee, who also
passed away last week.
RECESS
Mayor Probst adjourned the Regular City Council Meeting meeting at 10:05 p.m.
.
Dennis Probst
Mayor
Joe Lynch
City Administrator
NOTICE OF MEETINGS
The next Council Meeting will be held Tuesday, October 15,2002 at 7:00 p.m. at
the Arden Hills Council Chambers.
.
.
.
.
~
~
EN HILLS
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
September 26, 2002
Agenda Item 3.A
TO:
Mayor Demris Probst
Council Member Beverly Aplikowski
Council Member David Grant
Council Member Gregg Larson
Council Member Lois Rem
Terry Post, City Accountant@)
Claims and Payroll
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Attached:
Claims
Payroll for period 9/21/02 - 10/04/02
.
.
.
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CLAIMS REPORT
TO BE APPROVED AT 10/15/02 COUNCIL MEETING
PAGE10F3
CLAIMS PAID SINCE LAST COUNCIL MEETING (09/30/02)
. .'.bilC~'.'.'I'.'bk i:iitill...ttNlKilii ... ...............................................n...."'iitOOiilt....h .toMMtliri:s...........
21861 09/27/02 Batteries Plus 68.69 Batteries for Hand Held Trace Interroi!ator
21862 09/27/02 Met Council Environmental Services 35,640.00 SAC Char!!es-Aul!llst 2002
21863 09/27/02 Olde Town Deli 82.94 CC Worksession 6/17/02
21864 10/01/02 Fortis Benefits 307.26 October~!! Term Disabilir.:.--
21865 10/01/02 Fortis Benefits 256.50 October Short Tenn Disabilitv -
21866 10/01/02 Munic~a1s 35.00 2002 Fall Business Meetinl!-c. You:;;;;:-
21867 10/01/02 Diamond VO;:;;;l Paints 308.58 25 Gals White Paint
21868 10/02/02 Affini~ Plus Federal Credit Union NIA R~lace Check #21793-Ston Pavrnent Issued
21869 10/02102 Xee1 En~ 7,786.40 Sentember Service
21870 10/04/02 Ho;';- Zhen-;;- 121.00 Refund-Piano Plavhouse
21871 10/04/02 AT&TWire1ess 500,00 Escrow Release #02-27
21872 10/04/02 Kenneth Gammell 536.25 Cable Tech Services throuoh 10/01/02
21873 10/07/02 Affinitv Plus Federal Credit Union 4,898,87 First October Pavroll
21874 10/08/02 leMA Retirement Trust - 457 2.321.34 First October PaVToll
21875 10/08/02 MN Hooved Rescue Foundation 2,900,00 Rademacher Horse Case-Boarding Fees
21876 10/08/02 Linda Rademacher 50,00 Horse Case-Boardin17 Fee Settlement
I Subtotal - Paid Claims 55,812,83 I
Paid Claims From Above -
55,812,83
Add Unpaid Claims, Page 3 of 3 -
121.375,77
Total Accounts Payable Claims
for Council Approval, 10/15/02-
177,188.60
Note: Checks for unpaid claims totaling $161,040.66 were mailed on October 1, 2002
after approval at the September 30, 2002 Council Meeting. They were check numbers
21800 -21860. This sequence corresponds to unpaid temporary numbers TO] - T61.
Check numbers 2] 798 - 21799 were used for alignment.
_yl....".,.,p.yobJol._1
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CLAIMS REPORT
TO BE APPROVED AT 10/15/02 COUNCIL MEETING
UNPAID CLAIMS REGISTER,
:n~rj(: ,:: . "':{lATJV
TI
1'2
n
T4
T5
T6
T7
T8
T9
TIO
TII
TI2
TI3
TI4
TIS
TI6
TI7
TIS
TI9
T20
T21
T22
1'23
T24
1'25
1'26
T27
1'28
T29
no
n1
n2
n3
T34
10/15/02
10/15/02
10/15/02
10/15/02
10/15/02
10/15/02
10/15/02
10/15/02
10/15/02
10/15/02
10/15102
10/15102
10/15102
10/15102
10/15/02
10/15/02
10/15/02
10/15102
10/15/02
10/15/02
10/15/02
10/15/02
lOll 5/02
lOll 5/02
lOll 5/02
10/15/02
10/15/02
10/15/02
10/15/02
10/15/02
lOll 5/02
lOll 5/02
10/15/02
10/15102
.. .. ....
<:Mioom>
Accurate Press, Inc.
Advanta e Si s & Gra hies, Inc.
Animal Control Services, Inc.
Ararnark Uniform Service
Beck, Denice
BFI ofMN, Ine
Biffs, Jue
Cemstone Products Co.
Co orate Ex Tess
Coverall of the Twin Cities
D2 Services, Inc.
Elder Jones
ElectroWatcbman, Inc.
Exern: lar International, Ine
FastSi
Filter Fresh
Frattallone's Hardware
General R air Service
Glenwood In lewood
Go her State One Call
Home D at
H draLo ic
leI Dulux Paint Centers
Ind rodent S orts Network
LV.D.E. Local 49
Kath Auto Parts
lGn Kathleen
Kinko's
Lea e of MN Cities
Lexin ton Floral, Inc.
Lillie Suburban News a ers
Linder's Greenhouses
L ch,Joe
Mac ueen E ui ment, Inc.
1,591.12
285.15
429.61
83.69
33.00
244.53
421.56
123.81
1,088.14
1,238,60
622,04
162,10
25,00
38.00
19.40
278.22
116.81
580.43
29.31
91.45
1,238.22
127.73
605.39
1.580.25
240.00
230.04
33.00
89.11
3,359,80
55.95
69.61
2,042.76
33.22
28.76
Total- Unpaid Claims ~__
17,235.81 I
PAGE20F3
.
S t Newsletter/Business CardsJLetterhead
StreetIPla ound Si s & Posts
Do Cat Enforcement-S t
Ru Service-CH-October
Refund-Awesome Art Adventure
Waste Removal-October
Portable Toilets
Ucart RentaVCurb Mix
Office Su lies!C Pa er
Cleanin Service-CH
R airLift#2
Refund-Buildin Permit #BOl-8090
Pro am Char e-A. Andrews
Testin 9/12/02
Name Plate-P. Helle ers
CH-Bevera e Service
S tember Purchases
Air Comessor-Lift #13
S ater-CH-S t
Au st Service
Power Tools-Streets/Hand Rails-Parks
S rinkler Heads-Field #2
Mamt E ui /Field Pamt
U ire Services 8/20-10/02
October Pa 11 Deductions-Dues
Routine Maintenance-Sw er
Refund-Cre Crafts
C ies-Ro al Hi11s GardenfMGFOA TP Reimb
Sewer Back-u 3/26/02-BJue Fox
Funeral Arran ement-LemhuT
Le al Notices-S tember
Bo Scout Pro. RH Garden iR lace Tree
Lunch Mt w/Rams Co. re: TCAAP
Swc er Filter-Streets
.
.....yl.........p.y.o>loI.)o;"",
.
.
.
.
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CLAIMS REPORT
TO BE APPROVED AT 10/15/02 COUNCIL MEETING
PAGE 3 01'3
UNPAID CLAIMS REGISTER:
..ftMi!~...I.d('ll~t~,.J: . Yi:iroM.'.' "','..,.'."...................................,r..mQli1ilt...,r.. (iOMlli:irtS.........',....
1"35 ]0/15102 McKinnev, Mike 99.97 2002 Uniform Purchase
1"36 ]0/15/02 Midwest Asnhalt 142.89 Road Reoair Materials
1"37 ] 0/15102 Mn n;;;t of Health 3,243.00 Water Connect Fee 3002
1"38 10/15/02 Mn GFOA 60.00 GASB 34~Int AccountinQ: Course- T. Post
T39 10/15/02 Modem Fence & Canst., IDe 38.98 Hand Rails on Trails
T40 10/]5/02 North Metro Ins~ections, IDe 1.832.80 Sent Electrical In~ections
T41 10/15102 Olde Town Deli 27.65 M=t Mt.-9/27 JL, CY, TM, AP
T42 10/15102 Oriental Tradin----; Co., IDe 154.40 Art Sunnlies-Snoolcv Crafts {#1 & #2
T43 10/15/02 Orkin Pest Control 69.23 October Service-CH
T44 10/15102 Pace Anal~ical 848.62 Water Testinl1
T45 10/15/02 Post, Terrance 33.58 Mileal!c Reimbursement
T46 10/15102 Pro Staff 889.20 Temn-Office Sunnort Snce-WE 9/29/02
T47 10/15/02 Purchase Power ],442.00 Postal1e-Meter
T48 10/15/02 ~ick Silver 155.50 Deliverv Service
T49 10/15102 Rams~Coun~ 59,283.20 Oct Law Enforcement/Fuel
T50 10/15102 Sa~ Kleen COITloration 114.97 Haz Waste DisnosaI
'1'51 10/15/02 Shoreyiew, Citv of 90.00 Vallf>V Fair Admin Fees
'1'52 10/15102 s;;intPCS 107.55 Cellular Phone Service
'1'53 10/15/02 St. Paul Technical Colleoe 180.00 Creatllp Web Pes/Controlline: Emotions-Gritz
'1'54 10/15/02 Stanton GrOlln 100,00 FSA Admin Fees~Seotember
'1'55 10115/02 State of MN- DPnt of Admin 1,491.91 Centrex Phone Service
'1'56 10/15/02 T<lT<>'et Stores 24,91 Pot't-CC Worksession
'1'57 10/]5/02 Taurus ~ Co. 300,00 Lot:>o Si.::rn lnstallation-CC Chambers
'1'58 10/]5/02 Triarco Arts & Crafts 292,11 Art Sunnlies
'1'59 10/15102 United Rentals 136,96 Safetv Bani.... Vests, Glasses & Lift Bar
T60 10115102 URS 32,865.56 EnmneeOnQ" Fees-Anvllst
'1'61 10/15102 Winkel, David 114,97 2002 Uniform Purchase
Subtotal, Page 300- 104,139,96
Pa(Je 20f3 Broupht Forward- 17,235.81
I Total Unpaid ClaiIm 121,375.77 I
....tvI"""""""I",ahlolo..imd
-
~
N
..
0::
~
N
e
~
~
(5
~
c
w
!(
c
"'
:.:
u
w
J:
U
..J
..J
ON
tr:~
~~
Q.~
,
O::N
we
Ill;::;
Oc;;
1-0
U'"
0:;;:
I- "
00"
0:: .~
-1Il
LL_
00
..J
..J
:E
z
w
C
0::
<(
LL
o
>-
I-
(3
:-io* 8 .. ~ N ::;.;.0.
.~ .. .. ":"::!
c5 c5 ,.: ...
~ 00 -:0>>
.. .. ~ ":Co
0> ...; ::::i'i!:
E
..
"P
N ~ ~ N :-:i=iC-
~ .. .. ,~
'W .,; M ,.: ... -:-:~
:." 00 N ~ 00 .:.~
00 ::', .. ~
.:~ eO ...;
:':'.-::
:it
:~
&
..
'" . ::m
lZ ~ ~ .J:/
'" '6 "::<
S ~ .:....
0 :ti/
:~ "" ""
:~ Ii: I:: " ~ ]
'" "" ..
::.:-:.:~
~...~ . . . .
.. .. .. -::.:.
.. .. .. .00
c5 c5 c5 "::!#.
'C .. ~ :m
.. ~ 'C .:~
:j ,.: '" ..:~
!:: ..
N
- .:-~
" ~
.~ ~ Jj :-:':6
\; . ..~
> .. ~ ....~.
8 '"
. u
u a - ::.'fl"
" ::.1>:.-
Ii U .
~ ..~.
.~ -S "
.. ~ ..~.
.
.t 0: " ~.
"" "" "" ,
'" '" '"
"" "" ""
"" ~ ::iij
N ::!:t
M c5 .::~
~ 00 :~.
N .. :1:':'
N '.:~
.. ~ u.;.;.j
~ .. ":.'>q
do .,; ...~
~ ~
.. 00.
...;
.::~
...~
!
.:.~
;2 ~ ::,;J
.>:~
'" " Jl
00
.
.. .. ;! .. .. .. ::-ioi
.. .. .. .. .. ,".t:'>"
c5 c5 <f c5 c5 c5 :';.or:
-:Q\c
00 ";>XI.
00 .::#
~ .. S .. ~ 8 :.~'
00 .. .. :....
00 c5 ... c5 ;;: c5 .:.:-it
~ ~ M M ":m
00 :::(d
..
::
'6
. "
u
.. 0 . :::~
.S .
" 2 "
. ...~
~ 3
.2 ~ .s <Il
~ .:i ~ r~
ii; " " <Il e
~ . ::1 "
~ 0
.. " ~ ~ :::~
" '" j ffi "
IE 0 ~ .S
.2 ~ :::E
"" 00 "" ~
.. N 'C " Ii; I
~ ~ 'C
:d N 00 .,; do
N ~ ~
- - N. 'C
~ N .."
N ..
~
.3 '.'~
] ;; !ii :::8
. " . OJ :-:w
Q . \; . g
~ ;:: '" 0:
- ~ !ii ...1:
~ ~ .. ~
1 00 :::~
~ .
'" 00 '" ...~
'ii 00 " U ~
" "
;; 0
., 13 0 " :::E
Z ii;
'ii
~ I J
~ 00
::::::ji/ .. 1: M "
.....~ .,; .s ~ 'i ~ ~ " ""
~ -g ,g 0 ,g f- ~
00 uS !l E ~ E u
::.::0 f-o '" 1l " I
f,! i2 ~ ~ '" - '" :E
li 0 i2 i2 i2 ~ ~ ~ -g i2 0
f-o 00 "<l Il (; f-o
00 00 00 0 00
~ 00 00 00 ~ 00 '" 00 00 f-
- - - "" 00 ~
~ ~ . ;; ;; ;; . E " 00 " -S
~::: ] ;; ~ ~ :': .. ;; . ;; ~ ~ 0: .s .. ~
:;;0.:.'.. "" 00 00 .. do .. N M :E .. f-o 00 00 00 N
g:~ 8 .. 8 .. .. ~
.. .. ~
..::.0 d N d N c5 N
:::::: ti ~ .. .. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. .. .. .. .. .. ~ ~ .. .. ~ ~ .. .. .. ~ ..
.....~ .. .. .. .. .. c .. .. .. .. N .. .. .. ~
g .,; .. c5 c5 c5 c5 c5 c5 .. c5 ,.: - c5 c5 c5 .,;
N 00 N 00 N N N N 00 .. 00 00 00 00 N 00 00 .. - N 00 00 00 N
b:.....
00 ~ N 00 M M 00 .. ~ N .. S ~ ~ 00 0 M ~ g; ~ $ .:f..i:
.., .. M .. ~ ~ N '" .. ~ ~ 00 N ~ 'C N 00 ~ ~ 00 d
~ 00 c5 00 .,; ,.: .,; ... 0 do c5 N 00 ~ M .,; .,; ,.: M N M 00 c5 do .. '" >:i
~ ~ .. N 'C 'C ~ ~ M ~ ~ .. M M ~ g; 00 :;;: ~ "" ~ M
M. ~ 00 00. ~ M .., ". .. N :3 'C M N. 'C ~ M ". "._.
- - - -.--
.:;,I
:.~
:&0.; 00 .. ~ c .. N N .. .. ~ ::; ~ N S 00 .. 8 .. ~ .. :z: 'C ~ 8 :'J.e-
c c ~ .. 'C M M ~ .., 'C ~ 'C ~ 00 'C .. 'C 'C ~ ~ .:~:
'" M N ;;; c5 ~ 1i 00 N M M c5 do .,; 00 ... .,; M c5 c5 N M ~ ,.; .,; 00 ',:0;,;-
:~ ~. ~ ~ .. 'C ~ .. M .. 00 ;:: ~ ~ ~ .. ~ ~ ~ ~ ;!
"' :J ~ "' '" :': .. ". ~ ~. ~. M 'C. ". .. M "' ~ '" ~ ......
...; - N ...; ...; N ...; - - ':cl
:", .:;.
.:.~.
~ . 14 14 "
z ~ ] . {i t 8 " " '0
. . . '"
~ ., ~ . ~ :;: " . ~ {i . 0 "0 :E . " '" u ..
~ . . ~ 'C ;; . -g ~ . . . ~ a u " '" ~
.. Q ~ 00 '" ~ 00 " .1J 0 ~ il "" . Ii 0 .C " . . ..
"" !1 . ,; '" ~ Z i5 .g Q ~ "
.. if ~ o' u 1 '" . . -'i Ii ~ ,; ~ ..
M .. -'i . Jt " 11 '"
'" ~ " -5 . .d oii f-o ,; a 8 ~ . d 1i Jt ~ ! ..
'" ~ Ii . -E g ,; 0 '" :2 1f '" 0 ,; -Ii 0 ~ " s::::::.::::>
$ ~ {i ~ ~ " ~ :E 0 " < " 0 g
S 0 0 ::E 0 0 .. g
N . '" 0 . " . :E . . .?, . t3 :E ~ Jt is
~ ~ '" z 00 '" 00 '" " '" 00 ~ 00 '"
'j ~ ~ ~ C N M .. ~ ~ 'C N M .. ~ 'C ~ 00 .. 00 N M 'C N ~ ...~
fi....~ 0; 0; 0; N N N N N 0 C .. 8 8 .. .. .. .. .. .. 0 c .. .. c 0
.. c c c .. .. c .. 8 8 .. .. ~ ~ 8 8 .. 8 ..
.. .. .. c c c .. .. N N .. c " ;;: '" II
:"', N N N N N N N N N ~ M ~ M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. ~ ..
.":.tf:r
2::::0 0 N M .. ~ 'C ~ 00 ~ .. - ~ ~ .. ~, 'C ~ 00 ~ .. N N ~ .. ~ 'C ~.~
.. .. c .. .. .. .. .. - N N N N N N 11
u:.:.z' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M M M M M ~ ~ M M M M M ~ M M M M M M M M
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :::e
.
~ M .. ~ ~ 8
'C N ~ ~
00 ,.: .,; ,.: ,.: ...
N ~ .. ~ ~ 00
N. :': ~ N .. ~
:; .. N
..
a "" '"
~ s ~
{i ..,
~ ~ ~ @
:.:.j:;.j "" ~ . e
J ~ '" .1', ~
"" ~ .-
0 " ~ '6
;; } '" "
I! . ~
00 ., '" 0
" '"
.:.:.;t " " ~ 00 "" ""
....~ 0 3 ;; u u
13 0: z Ii: Ii:
.
~ l ~
e ~
.s .; "0
u ~
1l E
. 00
:; '" .
11 . -s
0 Jj
e 00
. c; .
" < !',
8 ~ .@
-a "
. . "
.!!' .E .
:0 2 .~
0 " 0
< . ~
. ii1 0
f-o t
], '" ~
K .
.:: ~ e
. ""
Ji .s ..
'" u
~ .. .~
" 0
. ] e
] .~ .
~ ~ "
.2 0 <Il
,;
'0
Z
"-
~
],
.
-
URS
. BRW, Inc.
AGENDA ITEM 3.B
BRW
Thresher Square
700 Third Street South
Minneapolis, MN 55415
Phone: (612) 37CJ.-0700
Fax: (612)370-1378
To:
Joe Lynch/Arden Hills
City Administrator
File: 37951-020-0101
From: Gregory S. Brown
Arden Hills City Engineer
Date: October 8, 2002
Subject: Pay Estimate #1
2002 Pavement Management Program
-Hunter's Court
-Waldon Place
.
Background
The City of Arden Hills awarded T.A. Schifsky and Sons of North St. Paul, MN the 2002
Pavement Management Program on July 29,2002 for a total contract amount of$160,4l6.50.
Project Status
The Contractor had a late start on this project but is continuing to make good progress. The
Contractor has completed the removals, storm sewer work, base preparation and curb work.
Recommendation
The Arden Hills City Engineer recommends the Council approve Pay Estimate #1 for T.A.
Schifsky and Sons of North St. Paul, MN in the amount of$83,322.60. A retainage of5.00% is
being held for this project.
.
.
.
.
OCT-09-2002 13:42
8RW
612 373 6526 P.02/14
APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT
PAYMENT NO.1
Project:
Owner:
Owner No.:
Contractor:
2002 Pavement Management Program for Hunters Court and Waldon Place
City of Arden Hills
SAW Job No.:
T. A, SCHIFSKY AND SONS
INC.
37951-020-0101
Application Date:
For Period Ending:
10/15/02
9/30/02
Original Contract Amount:
Contract Amendments:
Contract Amount To Date:
Total Amount of Work Complete To Dale:
Material Suitably Stored On-Site but not
Incorporated into Work:
Gross Amount Due To-Date:
Less 5.00% Aetainage:
Amount Due To-Date:
Less Previous Payments:
Total Due This Applicalion:
$160,416_50
$0.00
$160,416_50
$87,708.00
$0.00
$87,708.00
S4,385.40
$83,322.60
SO.OO
$83,322.60
I hereby certify that all items and amounts shown are correct for the work completed to-
date.
Contractor: T. A. SCHIFSKY AND SONS INC.
By:
Date:
The work on this project and the application for payment have been reviewed and the
amount shown is recommended for payment.
Date: }pA/t'J'?-
By:
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
Owner: City of Arden Hills
By:
Date:
Page 1 of 5
--~
OCT-09-2002 13:42 BRW 612 373 6526 P.03/14
Application for Payment: Itemization
Sch/!dul/!: A. ROADWAY .
Unit Contract Contract To-DBte T g-Date
No. Item Unit Price QuanUIV Amount Quantity AmIJunt
1 MOBILIZATION LS $B,OOO,OO 1.00 58,000.00 1~00 $8,000,00
2021.$0'
2 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER LF $2,00 1.484,00 $2,966.00 1 ,484~00 $2,96B,00
2104.!,\O)
3 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY 52.00 3,607,00 57,214.00 3,607.00 $7,214,00
2'04,503
4 REMOVE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT (BITUMINOUS) SY $3.00 311,00 $933,00 311.00 5933,00
2104.6OJ
5 REMOVE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT (CONCRETE) SY $4.00 17,00 56B,00 17.00 56MO
210~.505
6 REMOVE AND REINSTAll BASKETBALL HOOP EA 5200.00 2,00 $400,00 1.00 $200,00
AND POST
210~509
7 SAWCUT CONCRETE PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) LF 510.00 15,00 $150,00 15,00 5150,00
.2104.511
B SAWCUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT IFULL IF $4.00 391.00 $1,564.00 0,00 $0,00
DEPTH)
2104.513
9 SAL VAG E SIGNS AND POSTS EA $50.00 2.00 $100.00 0,00 $0.00
210.\11.5013
10 SALVAO, MAILBOX EA $50.00 16,00 $800,00 18,00 $800.00
2104.623
11 COMMON EXCAVATION (PI cy $6.40 2,170.00 513.888.00 2.170,00 513,888.00
2105,51;11 .
12 SUBGRAOE EXCAVATION C;Y 57.50 100.00 575000 0,00 50.00
210s..507
13 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW ICv) C;Y 510,00 1,310.00 $13,100.00 1,310.00 $13.100,00
2105.S'l2
14 LANDSCAPE RESTORATON lS 5100,00 1.00 5100.00 0,00 50.00
2105,n01
15 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM) HR 5100,00 5.00 5500.00 0.00 50.00
2123.5D1
16 AGGREGATE CLASS V 100% CRUSHED TON 515,00 50,00 5750.00 0.00 50W
lIMEROCK
<!~'l,SOl
17 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS V, 100% CRUSH EO CY 523,00 909,00 520.907.00 700.00 $16,100.00
LIMEROCK (CV)
2Z11.~2'
18 CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APRON SY $40.70 170.00 56.919,00 0.00 $0.00
2301.503
19 TYPE 41 81TUMINOUS MIXTURE ORIVEWAY SY $19,00 131.00 52,499.00 0.00 $0,00
PAVEMENT
2321.$11
20 TYPE LVNW35035C BASE COURSE MIXTURE TON 545,00 422.00 518,990.00 0,00 50.00
2:J[iO.(;O~
21 TYPE LVWE35OJ5C WEARING COURSE TON 54B.00 422.00 520,256,00 0,00 50,00
MIXTURE
2350.609
.. elTUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 52.00 183.00 $386,00 0,00 50.00
;':j$'7,$02
23 REINSTALL EXISTING MAILBOXES EA $50,00 16,00 $BOO.OO 0.00 50.00
2At2...602 .
24 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DESIGN SS18 IF $10.25 1,490.00 $15.272,50 1 .300,00 $13,325.00
2531.501
Page 3 of 5
OCT-09-2002 13:42 BRW 612 373 6526 P.04/14
Unit Contrllel Contragl To-oal. T ~Date
No. lIem Unll Price Quantity Amount Quantity Amo\Jnt
25 G' CONCRETE O~IVEW~Y PAVEMENT SY S44.00 10.00 $440.00 0.00 $0.00
2531.501
. TR~FFIC CONTROL lS $1.000.00 1,00 $1,000,00 1.00 $1,000.00
63.604
27 BALE CHECKS EA 510.00 20.00 $200.00 0,00 $0.00
~!in.M1
26 SllTFENCE. TYPE HEAVY DUTY LF $2.00 160,00 $320,00 50.00 $100.00
2573.502
2. SOOOING. TYPE LAWN WITH 4' TOPSOIL SY $$.00 1 ,300.00 $6.500.00 0,00 $0,00
2575.502-
30 61TUMINOUS PAVEMENT JOINT SAW AND $EAL LF $2.50 71B.00 $1.790,00 0.00 $0,00
0000.000
Subtotal: $147.534,50 $77.046.00
Schedule: B. STORM DRAINAGE
Unll Contract Contraet T o.Date To-Dato
No. nem Un" Price Quanlity Amount Quantity Amount
1 REMOVE PIPE (STORM SEWER) IF $55,00 12.00 $660,00 12.00 $660.00
:Z'O~.501
2 REMOVE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EA $410.00 2.00 $820,OD 3.00 $1,230,00
2104.Sot
3 MUCK EXCAVATION CY $16.50 100,00 $1.650.00 100,00 $1.660,00
2'105.507
4 TAENCH STABILIZATION ROCK CY $33.00 10.00 $330,00 0,00 $0,00
2501,61).f
5 W RCP DESIGN 3006 CLASS V IF $66.00 6.00 $39e.oO 6,00 $396.00
2503./)41
_ 27' ACP OESIGN 3006 CLASS V LF $63,00 12.00 $996,00 12.00 $996,00
Q3.5.1
4' HPDE OA PVC SU6DAAlN L' $4.70 :)0000 $1,410.00 300.00 $1,410.00
2503M'
6 ADJUST VALVE BOX Ell. $150.00 2,00 $300.00 0.00 $0.00
250</.802
9 CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN 12 FT X 3 FT} OVSR EA $990,00 2.00 $1.900.00 2,00 $1,960.00
EXISTING PIPE
2500.507
10 CONSTAUCT MANHOLE CATCH BASIN (46') EA $1,540,00 1.00 $1,540,00 1,00 $1,540.00
OVEA eXISTING PIPE
2S06.507
11 ADJUST FRAME AND RING CASTING EA $200,00 6.00 $1,200,00 0.00 $0.00
2508622
12 RANDOM RIP RAP CLASS III CY $00.00 20.00 $1.600.00 0.00 $0.00
2511,501
Subtotal: $12.862.00 $9.002.00
Grand Total: 5160,416,50 $87.706,00
.
Pag9 4 of 5
OCT-09-2002 13:42
BRW
612 373 6526 P.05/14
Application for Payment: Itemization Summary
Contract To-Date Amount of
Schedule Amount Work Completed .
A. ROADWAY $147,534,50 $77,846.00
B - STORM DRAINAGE $12,882_00 $9,602,00
Grand Total: $160,416,50 $B7.706.00
.
.
Page 5 of 5
,(
.
.
.
URS
BRVV
,
AGENDA ITEM 3.e
BRW
Thresher Square
700 Third Street South
Minneapolis, MN 55415
Phone: (612) 370-0700
Fax; (612) 370-1378
To:
Joe Lynch/Arden Hills
City Administrator
File: 37951-021-0101
From: Gregory S. Brown
Arden Hills City Engineer
Date: October 8, 2002
Subject: Pay Estimate #1
2002 Storm Drainage Improvements
-Perry Park
-Cummings Park
Background
The City of Arden Hills awarded Dryden Excavating, Inc. of Anoka, MN the 2002 Storm
Drainage Improvements Project on August 12,2002 for a total contract amount of$66,500.00.
Project Status
The Contractor has satisfactorily completed all aspects of this project.
Recommendations
The Arden Hills City Engineer recommends the Council approve Pay Estimate #1 (Final
Payment) for Dryden Excavating, Inc. of Anoka, MN in the amount of$65,755.00. This reflects
payment in full for materials and work related to this project. No retainage is being withheld for
this project.
OCT-09-2002 13:42
8RW
612 373 6526 P.07/14
APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT
PAYMENT NO.1
Project;
Owner:
Owner No.:
Contractor:
SAW Job No.:
2002 Storm Drainage Improvements
City of Arden Hills
FINAL PAYMENT
DRYDEN EXCAVATING, INC.
37951-021.0'01
Application Date:
For Period Ending:
10/15/02
9/30/02
Original Contract Amount:
Conlract Amendments:
Contract Amount To Date:
Total Amount of Work Complete To Date:
Malerial Suitably Stored On-Site but not
Incorporated into Work:
Gross Amount Due To-Date:
Less 0.00% Retainage:
Amount Due To-Dale:
Less Previous Payments:
Total Due This Application:
$66,500.00
$0.00
$66,500.00
$65,755.00
$0.00
$65,755.00
$0.00
$65,75500
$0,00
$65,755.00
I hereby certify that all items and amoun1s shown are correct for the work completed to-
date.
Contractor: DRYDEN EXCAVATING, INC.
By:
Date:
The work on this project and the application for payment have been reviewed and the
amount shown is recommended for payment.
Date: J (J A --6:2
By:
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
Owner: City of Arden Hills
By:
Date:
Page 1 014
'\.
.
.
.
OCT-09-2002 13:43 BRW 612 373 6526 P.08/!4
,I Application for Payment: Itemization
eChedule: A. PERRY PARK Unil Contract Conlnet To.Oat~ To~P8te
No. Item Unit Price Quantily Amount Quantity AMount
1 MOBILIZATION 1.5 $3,000.00 1.00 $3.000,00 1.00 $3,000.00
2021.501
2 51TE RESTORATION LS $5,000.00 1.00 $5,00000 1.00 $5,000,00
2'05.,501
3 5WALE GRADING SV $8.00 400.00 $3,200.00 400,00 $3.200,00
2105.601
4 RIP RAP CLASS III CY $65,00 300,00 $19,500.00 300.00 $19,500.00
251UO'
5 GWTEXTlLE FABRIC TYPE IV SV $5,00 400,00 $2,000.00 400.00 $2.000,00
251Ui15
6 BALE CHECK EA $5,00 15.00 $75,00 000 50.00
2573.50\
7 51L r FENCE HEAVY-DUTV TYPE LF $3.50 100,00 $350.00 30.00 $105 00
2673502
B 500 WITH 4' TOPSOIL SV $20.00 400,00 $8,000,00 400,00 $8,000.00
25750,501
9 5EEDING SY $3.00 135.00 $405.00 SOO.OO $1 ,800.00
2575.502
10 WOOD FIBER BlANKET SY $10.00 135.00 $1,350.00 600.00 $6,000.00
2S7S-S2J.
11 5 FT GALVANIZEO CHAINLINK FENCE LF $20.00 100.00 $2,000.00 100.00 $2.000,00
3j71H02
Subtotal: $44,880.00 $50,605.00
ehedu,e: B. CUMMINGS PARK
Unl1 Contract Contract To-Dale To-Date
No. lIem Unit Price Quantity Amount Quantity Amount
1 MOBILIZATION L5 $3,000.00 1,00 $3,000.00 1,00 $3,000.00
2021.501
2 COMMON EXCAVATION CV $12.00 200,00 $2.400.00 200,00 $2,400.00
2105,501
3 BITUMINOUS TRAIL REPAIR SY $12,00 335,00 $4,020.00 0,00 $0.00
2J5(1.52'
4 RIP RAP. CLASS III CV $S5.00 50.00 $3,250.00 50.00 $3,250.00
2511.50'
5 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS $1,800,00 1,00 $1.800.00 0.00 $0.00
256:J.Ii01
6 BALE CHECKS EA $5,00 25.00 $125.00 0.00 SO.OO
2573,50t
7 51L T FENCE, HEAVY.DUTY TYPE LF $3,SO 150.00 $525.00 0,00 SO.OO
2sn.S02
8 SEEDING SY $3.00 500.00 $1,500.00 500.00 $1,500.00
267&.502
9 wOOO FIBoR 8lANKET SY $10.00 SOO.OO $5.000.00 500,00 $5.000.00
2675.523
Subtotal: $21,620.00 $15,150,00
Grand Total: $66,500,00 $65,75$.00
.
Page 3 01 4
OCT-09-2002 13:43
BRW
612 373 6526 P.09/14
\
Application for Payment: Itemization Summary
Contract To-Date Amount 01
Schedule Amount Work completed .
A. PERRY PARK $44,680.00 $50,605.00
B. CUMMINGS PARK $21,620,00 $15,150,00
Grand Total: $66.500.00 $65.755,00
.
.
Page 4 of 4
"
.
.
.
URS
AGENDA ITEM 3.0
BF~,^lj Inc.
BRW
Thresher Square
700 Third Street South
Minneapolis, MN 55415
Phone: (612) 370-0700
Fax: (612) 370-1378
To:
Joe Lynch/Arden Hills
City Administrator
File: 37951-022-0101
From: Gregory S. Brown
Arden Hills City Engineer
Date: October 8, 2002
Subject: Pay Estimate #1
2002 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Rehabilitation Project
Background
The City of Arden Hills awarded Visu-Sewer Clean & Seal of Fridley, MN the 2002 Sanitary
Sewer and Water Main Rehabilitation Project on August 12, 2002 for a total contract amount of
$246,435.50.
Project Status
Water Main
The Contractor has completed the directional boring and connection of the watermain and
the line is now functional. The Contractor still has to complete the sodding and seeding
portion of the restoration, which has been delayed due to wet conditions.
Sanitary Sewer
The Contractor has completed the manhole adjustments and prep work for the sewer
relining. The relining is scheduled to start the week of October 14 and is expected to take
1-1/2 to 2 weeks.
Sanitary Sewer Test and Seal
Testing and sealing work is scheduled to begin in November and is expected to last about
one month.
Recommendations
The Arden Hills City Engineer recommends the Council approve Pay Estimate #1 for Visu-
Sewer Clean & Seal of FridJey, MN in the amount of$65,624.57. A retainage of 5.00% is being
held for this project.
~
.
.
.
OCT-09-2002 13:43
BRW
6123736526 P.l1/14
APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT
PAYMENT NO.1
PrOject:
Owner;
Owner No.:
Contractor:
2002 Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Rehabilitation Project
City of Arden Hills
VISU-SEWER CLEAN &
SEAL, INC.
37951-022-0101
SRW Job No.:
Application Date:
For Period Ending:
10115/02
9/30/02
Original Contract Amount:
Contract Amendments:
Contract Amount To Date:
Total Amount of Work Complete To Date:
Material Suitably Stored On-Site but not
Incorporated into Work:
Gross Amount Due To-Date:
Less 5,00% Retainage:
Amount Du"" To-Date:
Less Previous Payments;
Total Due This Apptication;
$246,435.50
$0.00
$246,435.50
$69,076.50
$0.00
$69,076.50
$:3,453.9:3
$65,624.57
$0,00
$65,624.57
I hereby certify that all items and amounts shown are correct for the work completed to-
date.
Conlractor: VISU-SEWER CLEAN & SEAL, INC,
By:
Date:
The work on Ihis projecl and the application for payment have been reviewed and the
amount shown is recommended for payment.
Date:
/on~;l.
By.
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
Owner: City of Arden Hills
By:
Date:
Page lotS
OCT-O'3-2002 13'43 BRW 512 373 5525 P.12/14 ~
Application for Payment: Itemization
Schedule: A. WATER MAIN .
Uni\ Conlract Contract To~DilJte 'fo.Dale
No. 118m UnIt Pllee Quanli1y AmDunt Quantity Amount
M081LIZATION Ls $5,500,00 1.00 $5,500.00 1,00 $5.500,00
2021.S01
2 ABANOON 8' OIP IN CASING LF $2.50 100.00 $250.00 0,00 $0,00
2.104,50'
3 REMOVE EXISTING 8" OIP WATER MAIN LF $2,50 1.260.00 $3,150.00 1.168.00 $2,920.00
:?104.501
4 OIRECTIONAL BORE 8" PEP WATER MAIN LF $29,50 170.00 $5,015.00 000 $0.00
2503.541
5 314" PVC WATER SERVICE LF $31,50 60,00 $1.890,00 5,00 $157,50
ZSOi,603
6 31" PVC SERVICE WITH CUR8 STOP EA $1.575.00 1.00 $1,575,00 1,00 $1.576,00
2503.600
7 6' PVC WATER MAIN LF $50.00 10.00 $500 .00 10.00 $500.00
2503,003
8 e' PVCWATER MAIN LF $29,50 1.120,00 $33,040.00 1.168,00 $34.456,00
2S03.60J
9 DIP FITTINGSNlAAPPEO LB $4.00 500.00 $2,000,00 500.00 $2,000.00
2604.602
10 INSTALL HYDRANT 18' G~TE VALVE EA $4,200.00 1.00 $4,200.00 1.00 $4.200.00
251;)1,602
11 CONNECT TO EXISTING EA $2,625.00 2,00 $5,250,00 2.00 $6,250.00
~SO"'.60~
12 TR~FFIC CONTROl LS $2,100.00 1,00 $2.100,00 1.00 $2.100,00
2553.801 .
13 BALE CHECK EA $0.01 50.00 $0.50 0,00 $0,00
2573,501
14 SOD WITH 4' TOPSOIL sy $0,01 1,110.00 $11.10 0,00 $0.00
2S;tr;.Wl
15 SIL HENCE LF $2,00 200.00 $400.00 000 $0.00
2575.502
16 SEEDING WITH MULCH AC $1,00 0,60 $0,60 0.00 $0.00
2575.505
Subtotal: $84.882.20 $58.656,50
Schedule: B - SANITARY SEWER RELINING
Unit Contract Contract To-Date To-Date
No. Item Unit Pric:e O"ontily Amount Quantity Amount
1 MOBlllZA nON LS $1,330,00 1.00 $1.330.00 1.00 $1.330.00
2021501
2 10" VCP RELINE LF $26,00 1,380.00 $35,680,00 0.00 $0.00
0000,000
3 12" VCP RE-LINE LF $26.00 600.00 $15,600,00 0.00 $0.00
0000.006
4 REMOVE MANHOLE STEPS EA $50,00 35.00 $1,750.00 0.00 $0.00
2104.509
5 INSTALL MANHOLE STEPS EA $61,00 35,00 $2,635.00 0.00 $0.00
~50~.60:!
6 REBUilD MANHOLE INVERT EA $1.100.00 3.00 $3,300.00 000 $0.00
2S0~,60Z
7 ~DJUST RINGS AND CASTING EA $525.00 9.00 $4.725.00 9,00 $4.725,00 .
2506..6.02
page 3 of 5
! OCT-09-2002 13:44 BRW 612 373 6526 P.13/!4
Unit Contract Contract To-Date To-DarA
N~. Item Unit Price Quantity Amount Quantity Amount
6 CHIMNEY SeAL eA $465.00 9,00 $4.365.00 9,00 $4,365,00
2508.802
. Subtotal: $69,785,00 $10.420.00
Schedule: C . TEST AND SEAL
Unit Contr.ct Contr.ae1 To-Date TO-Date
No, lIem Unit Price Quantity Amount Quantl1y Amount
1 MOBILIZATION LS $3,000.00 1.00 $3,000,00 0.00 $0.00
~O21,501
Z JOINT TEST 8' EA $27.50 2,500.00 $88.750.00 0.00 $0.00
Z:;OM02
3 JOINT TEST 10' EA $35,00 25.00 $875.00 0,00 $0.00
2503.602
4 JOINT TEST 18' EA $55,00 275.00 $15,125.00 0.00 $0,00
2~03.602
5 JOINTTEST 21" EA $05,00 185.00 $12.025,00 0.00 $0,00
2503,602
6 JOINT SEAL BO GAL $9.30 460.00 $4,464.00 0.00 $0,00
250.'\.602
7 JOINT SEAL 10" GAL $9,30 10.00 $93.00 0.00 $0.00
2S03.5a~
6 JOINT SEAL 18' GAL $9,30 207,00 $1,925,10 0.00 $0,00
2503.50Z
9 JOINT SEAL 21' GAL $9.30 164,00 $1.711.20 0.00 $0.00
2503.602
10 MANHOLE SEAL CHEMICAL GAL $36.00 100.00 $3.800,00 0.00 $0.00
250fi.1>02
. Subtotal: $111,786.30 $0.00
Grand Total: $246,435.50 $69,078.50
.
Page 4 or 5
OCT-08-2002 13:44
6123736526 P.14/14
BRW
Application for Payment: Itemization Summary
,
Contract To-Date Amount of
S~hedule Amount Work Completed .
A - WATER MAIN $S4,ea2.20 $58.658.50
B . SANITARY SEWER RELINING $69,785.00 $10.420.00
C. TEST AND SEAL $111,7ij830 $0.00
Grand TOlal: $246,435,50 $89.078.50
page 5 01 5
TOTAL P.14
.
.
'.
.
.
.
...
~
EN HILLS
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
AGENDA ITEM 3.E
October 10,2002
TO:
Mayor and City Council
Thomas J. Moore, Director of Operations and Maintenance~ J - k
FROM:
SUBJECT:
SCORE Recycling Grand Fund Application
BACKGROUND:
The city is eligible to apply for a SCORE recycling grant in the amount of$18,848.00. Those
funds would assist in improving the City's 2003 recycling program.
RECOMMENDATION: .
Staff recommends the City Council approve Resolution No. 02-52, A Resolution Authorizing the
Application for SCORE Recycling Grant Funds for 2003.
.
.
.
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 02-52
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR
RECYCLING SCORE GRANT FUNDS FOR 2003
WHEREAS, the City of Arden Hills is eligible to apply for $18,848.00 in SCORE
recycling grant funds; and
WHEREAS, such funds would assist in continuing and improving the City's recycling
program for the year 2003.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arden
Hills, Minnesota:
That the City Administrator be authorized to apply for such grant funds for the
year 2003.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN
HILLS THIS 15th DAY OF OCTOBER, 2002.
ATTEST:
DEN}ilSPROBST,MAYOR
JOSEPH P. LYNCH, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
SAINT PAUL - RAMSEY COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SECTION
.
2003 SCORE FUNDING GRANT APPLICATION
@;jTOWNSHIP ell( or;::. AK.DGJ 1-\1Lt.-5
CONTACTPERSON ~J'l\~) Moo~ ,OrfR,4-jlOJl~ { MA1~(E1-lM(f D,K(qoj(
\'1.4-\ \}JB-r ~ q~
!\fZJ)$J ~ll-LS fI/\/J 5)))1- t;7Qy-
i
PHONE ({O~)) 103~- S\~'3 FAX (loI;\.) lo'3~- 1:)137
ADDRESS
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. DESCRIPTION OF 2003 RESIDENTIAL RECYCLING PROGRAM
1. In 2003, will any collection services be provided under a cantract? Yes K Na
a. If so, pravide contractor(s), address, and contact name.
f-z [Z.Ec'f<'.L1N0 > .&NG
8r;;- Non. p./ Pit-IOi( I f+J6Jwt S'T:' fJ1v,L. ,f\lJN
(
~J04--_
.
b. Which type of households are expected to receive service under the contract?
Single-family:)( Duplex: K Triplex: 4plex:
Townhome: Y Condominium: Manufactured Home Park:
Multi-unit buildings (up to units):
c. What is the total number of households expected to receive service under the contract?
Single-family thru 4-plex: ~ 2400 Multi-unit buildings with 5 or more units:
d. What materials will be collected? (If different materials will be collected based on type of
housing, please describe differences.)
\ l::\fv.lS~A-PER.. (CM!.Og~M1>
-z. rLASilC. tSorrt.t'; ') C',,;/J"rJfIlJ&!lS
'3 /VI-cTl'jL cM)'
c'LI\~S
e. What is the collection frequency? (If frequency is different based on type of housing, please
describe differences.) .
vJtt~1
.
.
.
2. How will the municipality assure materials are collected in 2003 from those households that will
not receive recycling collection services under amunicipaHY-<lrranged contract? (e.g.. ordinance
provisions, licensing requirements, other mechanism) What materials are required to be
~~S:;~T~A~ wf~i~~~~e?SGn.ll~<S /fJ ~.. ON( MoEILF: HQmE PM/( (4f/.Bl!N A1Mm ')
IJ)JJ> 'rntr 'J1tLt'E ($) Mkl.n'il6Joj COtl)f'~ C!/wJ,IfIlS fMft (()1~b6 vILLAS >1JJ$
{J"fZ)<SI-l0l1..t) 1tR.f. PtIbV /O@ f;, 'T7t1: t.J4 r~: . IJIMLIM. (611. '7J1l5;~ &~JINC:fJCJ CJ J..J
A (OJ-iTfVK.,-uIJL845>S AND TbNN4bt..<sgt&/l~ Ta .~ c.T'f !It-<<YCL',JC:,
COM</),AA1'-of{... /fItf!t:lll-9-LJ (()Ll-~[)L<{) /JJ,I!J ~ rk"y>I.IL<:t-Jey oF' (oLu:5crldAi
1'5 1J/tE. \'i9ME:' 1'1<; Tift Ct'tf- Sft>>JS{jf{;tfj) (lr$/I}6N'(J4L CL/!lGSIPt; fZf<'ICLIJJ6,f?wt,l~
3. What changes are planned or anticipated for 2003? .
NOJ0~' .
4. How are recycling services in 20Q3'.td be paid for, beyond any use of SCORE funds? What long-
term funding sourc.e is in place for recycling services?
~blf I~ U~t'! OF A 011; uJ1P1Mj'(J)~('~JJl''r '/tJ Y\)f~ AN
ANtJ~L )'(fRV/t€ F<< (1) 18.()(J jlJ zoaz)JC:l !NIJIII1f)q.IJL.!/-fL'-4"). MN&5
. . . . . !J-CSlbet(Ml-.
5. Describe the munifipality's source reduction Qndrecyding protnotionalefforts, List types of
materials to be used, intended audiences, and method and frequency of distribution.
g'i L'tCNSI~b. ~)A€Jl1~'S I ~n:: JfJNLl.~ MtCI PICk lofPOJJ
11Jt: S~ 0!rI 1\5 ~ Ol'fJ(lEcYC,-,/JJ{. (oN7VK.~ .LJNIoAlb ~
H.Af.;r oF" p....rrJt4, 0"\'- VJM~ f)NIJ(b..-<'e'fCLASt..(S f&{ {()GUJ~'7oIJ
i1~ 66::JJ 'Ij{{tZ;y (lJQT\IJ~, f2L~1)\
6. What measurable goals do you have for source reductlonandrecycling activities in 2003? Please
describe how you will meaSure progress toward those goals ana how activities will be evaluated.
/I1f}lAJT./flN DfL 2J:PJ~ ff!IL (lflir4 'fO;.:vJ1tfE 8'f77'/fJ l(lJ(;W4,)6).j
&JJ 1"141Pf~ Or TJfG 6./~/IAb (l{fr,PL"<'A1ffm... ~'fU,)JJb pAi)~
7. If any activities will be conducted by a contractor or subcontractor, what provisions will be:made
to monitor and audit (sub )contractor activities?
'^ ,MotJiNc1 IOJJ,J ~ $'1>')f1)}t({ (JtC-MPt;<P /j'f S'4J(6JJ!~Ji!.>?. (€-z..)
g Ap.-uJ l'hu.S D~.-\ I-hG>11 L~Ct.. of 9u/1-t..H )L.~\/,(i0 Bf-
. PAAhgf!) /JPV ~ V/~Il.cPJ) IV Lcm~l, 'pH: G'N p~ of
S-wS(OJJrll;fc;'-04.. <;JkJII::/(oJ'll7JJbJ ~ .4 (tlS/<:JMlPl... )if{,hcr: ~foJJJ'"J.
B. SCORE GRANT REQUEST
.
1. Please describe how 0 SCORE grant would enhonce or improve source reduction and recycling
efforts in your community. List specific activities for which SCORE funding would be used.
1Itt ~COn..C Gfl./YVl ffl)IS IS tN 'mE S tf 8 'f,Py of
oF 'pI.f (I1Y1' flLSIDf!AJTtItL Ct-(/(t5i9{!- k-:eYCutJh
Sflfel/'1('h,'-'1 7l+6 Cou-Cel7otJ c5 (CmclJ)ljli'S,
/7ff; (Oqs
ftl.bbn!HJII ~
2. Please show how you intend to allocate your 2003 SCORE grant. Detail how you intend to use
SCORE funds within each applicable budget area. Attach a copy of your 2003 municipal budget
for all recycling activities, including all funding sources. (If the budget has not been
adopted by your governing body. attach the most current draft budget.) \ , 1
\' ~ 'rr".Ot~~ A.'T IS jJ;c ftfJJf(;jt~ 1.~ j gl.A,bUJ' fb/l.. ~ ~..66) - ~LIJJb J
PROPOSED SCORE BUDGET-SCORE EXPENSES ONLY
ADMINISTRA TION:
$
$
PROMOTION ACTIVITIES
Please detail:
EQUIPMENT
Please detai I:
$
COLLECTION OF RECYCLABLES $ \ B) B l\B
Please detail:
1l'}'T4L <;~&O)JI1M.1D'l (OS)) ;4I1:G 6i!Jfl1frt!/)
17> Ct- '$ ?;?; 7i:;o IN V'd) I J>>C S'Cbflt bfiAJ,r/
.
fdltJ1M5 Av M!/J;:I-INJ~ sl.s-% SiJesl/)'f 6f:' /fhS (aj)...
TOTAL SCORE GRANT
$ \8, B'-\-~
.
.
,~ - . ~
. c. IN-HOUSE REcYCUNG PROGRAM
.
.
Please describe the recycling program for materials generated at municipal facilities, per
requirements in Minn. Stat. Sec. 115A.151. List materials collected and servicepfovider(s). Ifany
materials are brought to a drop-off center or otherwise not ~andled by a collection service, list
t.hose materials and des. cribe .hOW they are transferred. l'
-r~, urtf~ S'~g(M1MrWL 4t50 fA-o.hP6 (Q,0/,cJJJb Sl91.>ML:5L~t?
$ft5!'lS J1s Pl(/fL-q) '-'If ~ f4..'~Mp>tJz) 1ft 71jtJ O'tr /.J/Ju.. ( ,2lJ-S" vJ I-MI'~
Avf) 7JIt! 1'441~cE Gt)Mbfi l
D. RESOLUTION
Please attach a.resolution from your governing body requesting the fundingallocati9n,or a ce('.tified
copy of the official proceedings at which the request was approved. SCOREgrantsllgreenients
cannot be issued without'such an attachment.
6J CL{)5&.J (~/F'II::{)
/2.a'Z,U.J, PtN ~O ,
(o!y DF 6'N OF IJR-PftJ Hlk.LS
02- - 5'2.
NAME OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SUBMIT GRANT:
"1b5f/tt
t:,}l'f A;JJM7IJ1S-rM'JoIC
TLE
DC/oBiS/(
DATE
I <0 "2lJo7-
J
F
Please return the completed grant application form by."NOVEMBER 1, 2002, to:, .
DAN DONKERS, PROGRAM ANALYST
SAINT PAUL - RAMSEY COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PtJBLIC lo:lEAI:TH
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SECTION
1670 BEAM AVENUE, SUITE A
MAPLEWOOD. MN 55109
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
2003 BUDGET
\"\ ~TT~~M6J,,\ A, II ~
'F~ila':"':"'>:' .,.,.,.,. ..... ..... .. ... ..., . """".,::r ,.. """""':':':'. ':. """"""""""""""""""", ,.
::ii~m~~{iJ~~d:~mm':m: . .. . ............... ....: .'>.<'.. ",::::'::<", .,
", ,::;,:,;:";,:,,,:.:::::::!:,:
jcet
No. ACCOtJNTDESCRlPTlON
PERSONAL SERVICES
1010 Admin Ft Employees Reg
1012 Public vvorks Employees Reg
1020 FulI-Time Employees Ot
1130 Employer Savillgs Match
1210 Pera EIl!Ployer Expense
1220 Fica El:pense
1300 Insur3l1ce El:pense
Sub-Total
SU....LIES
2010 Office Supplies/Accessc,ries
2020 Copier/Paper El:pense
2030 Prillted Forms
Sub-Total
OTllER SEkVICES & CHARGES
~095 OUtside Data Processin~ Fees
.no Mileage Reimbursement
3840 Res Recycliug Costs
3845 Res Clean-up Costs
4090 Other Services
4330 DUeslSubsCriptiollslLicellses
Sub-Total
TOTALEXl'ENS'ES
2000
Actual
2002
Revised
..... .. ....
.. ...... .. ...
~9~'H~~~::m:WH:H::'
2G02 200
Est. Pro osed
2001
Actual
2002
Adopted
2,882
2,672
245
o
299
441
441
317
742
485
13
78..
114
55
7,030
1,985
500
o
525
730
1,210
7,030 7,315 1,450
1,985 2,335 3,100
500 560 600
0 300 0
525 565 285
130 780 395
1,210 650 510
11,980 12,505 6,340
6,980
1,804
11,980
250
o
o
250
o
o
250
o
250
250
o
250
250 250
0 0
250 250
5i10 500
913 ~
0
58,260 59,750
7,000 7,500
0 0
0 0
66,233 68,250
79,238 75,090
250
500
250
500
965 0 500 500
16 0 0 0
56,568 58,260 60,010 60,010
6,871 6,654 7,500 7,500
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
64,420 64,914 68,010 68,010
71,650 66,968 80,490 80,490
REVENtJE
31900 Penalties & Interest 125 131 100 100 0 100
33620 Couuty Aid-Score Grant 19,554 19,418 18,890 18,890 18,891 18,400
36199 Recycling Service Fee 54,145 54,423 42,400 42,400 43,500 45,000
36210 Interest Income 3,700 3,805 2,500 2,500 1,800 1,500
Total Revenue 77,524 77,777 63,890 63,890 64,191 65,000
.
t
Saint Paul - Ramsey County
Department of Public Health
Rob Fulton, Director
Environmental Health Section
1670 Beam Avenue - Suite A
Maplewood, MN 55109-1176
651-773-4466 Fax: 651-773-4454
R~:Ci~;'rr:~l
CI:: ,~ci:~~i,~" I
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
RE:
September 16, 2002
Municipal Recycling Coordinators
Dan Donkers, Program Analyst
2003 SCORE Grant Applications
<<APPLICATION DUE NOVEMBER 1, 2002>>
Attached are the materials for the 2003 SCORE Funding Grants, including the SCORE Funding
Guidelines, the 2003 SCORE Funding Grant Application, and a table showing the funds available for
each municipality.
Please take a close look at the application questions and instructions. ALL QUESTIONS must be
answered fully in order to process the application. Adequate level of detail and description will avoid the
need for follow-up, speed up the process of getting the agreement to your municipality, and increase the
. chance of receiving the full grant amount for which you are eligible. In short, it makes things easier for
everyone!
The Grant Guidelines also offer examples of eligible expenses, as well as clarifications on restrictions and
conditions on the use of SCORE funds. Please read these carefully as you consider what to propose in
your grant application. Any questions, please call me before you submit your application.
If you do not have your council/ board resolution authorizing submission of the application and
acceptance of the funds by November 1, submit the application with a note stating that the resolution is in
process and when the resolution will be approved. The adopted resolution MUST be submitted no later
than December 14,2002.
If you do not have an approved recycling program budget by November 1, submit the most recent draft
budget and forward the approved budget when it is available.
Cities with Joint Powers Agreements for collection of the City Recycling Fee must have the City
Recycling Fee amounts included as an attachment to the SCORE Grant Application.
If you have any questions about the application or the guidelines, please call me at 651-773-4451.
Thanks, and let's make the most of our reduction and recycling programs!
.
G
wn-"",,-"IotI_willhlllIllii1iimum<d'f2lll'll,__
~
2003 Municipal SCORE Grant Availability .
2001 pop. (Met
Municipality Council Estimates) % otTotal Grant Available
Arden Hills 9,660 1.9% $ 18,848
Falcon Heights 5,580 1.1% $ 10,887
Gem Lake 424 0.1% $ 827
Lauderdale 2,364 0.5% $ 4,612
Little Canada 9,813 1.9% $ 19,146
Maplewood 35,080 6.8% $ 68,446
Mounds View 12,750 2.5% $ 24,877
New Brighton 22,215 4.3% $ 43,344
North Oaks 4,000 0.8% $ 7,805
North Saint Paul 11,923 2.3% $ 23,263
Roseville 33,949 6.6% $ 66,239
St. Anthony (part)', 2,517 0.5% $ 4,911
Saint Paul 287.260 56.0% $ 560,482
Shoreview 26,374 5.1% $ 51,459
Vadnais Heights 13,151 2.6% $ 25,659
White Bear Twp 11 ,384 2.2% $ 22,212
White Bear Lake (part) 24,080 4.7% $ 46,983 .
Total 512,524 100.0% $ 1,000,000
.
.'
.
.
.
SAINT PAUL - RAMSEY COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SECrION
2003 MUNICIPAL GRANT GUIDELINES: SCORE FUNDING GRANTS
SCORE FUNDING GRANTS are provided to municipalities in Ramsey County. Grants are provided to
a municipality pursuant to an Agreement between the County and municipality fallowing application
for a grant by the municipality. The grant funds are capped for each municipality, and are calculated
on a per capita basis.
Elioible EXIlenses
General Information
. SCORE funds are granted by the State to the County. Ramsey County must follow. State law
that sets out restrictions on how funds may be used, including how funds are used by grOlltees.
Inappropriate uses may result in the County (and, by extension, grantees) receiving less funding.
. SCORE funds can only cover expenses that are not reimbursed by another source (e.g., clean-up
fees, recycling service charge, outside grant program, etc.).
. Changes from the budget adopted in the grant agreement are possible (such as moving money
from one budget area to another, replacing a project in the budget with a new one, etc.), but
requests to do so must be made in writing. County staff must obtain the County Manager's
written approval to change the budget once the agreement is signed.
. Creative and innovative ideas are encouraged! Do not let these guidelines limit your ideas.
However, if you would like to use SCORE funds for a project that does not seem to fit the
guidelines, please talk to County staff first to make sure you have the funding support you need
for a successful project.
Equipment: All equipment must remain the property of the Municipality. Examples of eligible
expenses include:
. Purchase or lease of equipment used only for collection Olld transportation of recyclable
materials, or collection and storage of recyclable materials at municipal drop-off centers (e.g.,
trucks, storage containers, sorting equipment, etc.)
. Recycling collection containers, bins, totes, bags, etc.
. Purchase or lease of computer/data processing equipment used for mOllaging recycling data (e.g.,
bar coding equipment, etc.)
. Recycled content products that contain post consumer waste (not just pre-consumer/post-
industrial recycled content), but only the "premium," if any, above the price of a comparable
virgin product (examples of eligible recycled content products include plastic lumber, plastic
picnic tables, copy paper and other office supplies, paint, glass road aggregate, garbage bags,
carpet, etc.)
. Brush/wood waste chipping equipment: purchase, rental, maintenance expenses
. Equipment that results in waste reduction, approved on a case-by-case basis (e.g" duplexing units
for laser printers, air hand dryers for restrooms)
Promotion: Must address waste/toxicity reduction, recycling, recycled products, composting, c1ean- .
ups, or other waste-related issues to qualify for SCORE funding. Audiences may include businesses,
residents, and municipal employees. SCORE funds may be used to cover costs of production and
distribution af pqper materials (brochures, newsletters. etc.) that model environmentally
preferable printing practices, such as using pqper made with a minimum of 30% post-consumer
recycled content, using agri-basedinks, and including a tag line promoting how the publication
demonstrates environmentally preferable printing practices. Examples of eligible expenses
include:
. Production and distribution of printed materials (e.g., "how to" recycling guides or brochures,
waste reduction posters, recycling reminder lawn signs, etc.)
. Features, articles, etc. in municipality newsletters (coverage of SCORE-related issues must
comprise a significant portion of the newsletter's content if seeking full cost reimbursement)
. Advertising in the media (e.g., newspaper, radio, etc.)
. Postage for distribution of promotional information (e.g., newsletters, direct mail. etc.)
. Pramotional goods (e.g., magnets, pencils, cloth bags, mugs, key chains, clothing, etc.)
. Environmental education activity materials (e.g., coloring books, displays, educational performing
traupes, videos, etc.)
. Video productions
. Web design/hosting expenses (only the costs directly associated with waste/toxicity reduction,
recycling, composting, or other waste management issues)
. Cash prize drawings as incentives are eligible if included in the grant application
> > >REMINDER: The SCORE grant agreement requires that Ramsey County and the State of .
Minnesota ,?CORE fund be credited asfunding sources in any public education materials paid
for in part or in full with SCORE funds. Materials not so labeled are not eligible for
reimbursement.
. .
Recycling Collection: For. collection activities that will maintain and increase the level of recycling
beyond the level achieved in 2002. Examples of eligible expenses include:
. Contractor costs for municipal-sponsored residential collection (any and all residences)
. Grants to multi-unit or manufactured home park property managers to help cover cost of
collection (if not provided by municipal contractor)
. Recycling services for municipal facilities (including parks) or city-sponsored community events
. Recycling collection programs for small businesses
. Reuse;recycling, or source-separated organics composting of materials collected at community
clean-up events (Disposal costs are NOT an eligible expense. Also, if clean-up patrons are
asked to pay a fee for specific items, such as appliances, electronics, tires, etc., SCORE can be
used only topqy the difference between what the patron pays and the cost to the municipality
to recycle that item.)
} <,...
Administration
. Salary and benefits to cover that portion of employee time (full- or part-time) dedicated to
planning, coordinating, implementing, or operating the recycling program; yard/tree waste
recycling/composting program; public education efforts for recycling, waste reduction, HHW .
management, clean-up events at which at least a portion of materials collected are reused or
recycled, etc.
.. '
.
.
.
.
5ubmittinq Q Grant Application
The Municipality must complete a grant application, on a form provided by the County, which includes
the following information:
1. A description of the Municipality's curbside recycling program and long-term source of
funding;
2. A description of programs or provisions for assuring residential recycling service is available
to residents on-site at all multi-unit housing and manufactured home parks;
3. A description of promotional efforts in the Municipality;
4. A description of the Municipality's in-house recycling program, established pursuant to Minn.
Stat. Section 115A.151;
5. A description of proposed uses for SCORE Funding Grants and a budget itemizing proposed
costs; and,
6. A resolution from the governing body of the municipality requesting the funding allocation, or
a certified copy of the official proceedings at which the request was approved.
Use of Grant Funds
FOR ALL MUNICIPALITIES:
A. The Municipality shall submit two reports to the County: the first is due in August of the grant
year and the second in February of the following year. The due dates are specified in the grant
agreements. The reports cover the periods of January 1 - June 30, and July 1 - December 31,
respectively. The reports are to be on forms provided by the County. These reports are to
include.information on recycling at all residential units, including multi-unit housing and
manufactured home parks, even if the municipal program does not serve them.
B. The Municipality shall, upon request, submit an audited financial report to the Ramsey County
Budget and Accounting Office. The report shall show how funds received from Ramsey County
were disbursed.
C. Any public education materials produced by the Municipality or its subcontractor{s} using
SCORE funds shall credit the County and the State of Minnesota's SCORE fund as funding
sources.
FOR MUNICIPALITIES THAT DO NOT ENTER INTO A JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT FOR
RECYCLING FUNDING:
A. The Municipality shall incur expenses for reimbursement according to a budget attached to the
Agreement. The total amount available shall be capped at a specific amount. The Municipality
shall not USe grant funds for expenses, or a portion of expenses, which have been or will be
reimbursed by other parties.
B. To receive reimbursement the Municipality shall submit a claim using a form provided by the
County, and shall include proper documentation for expenses including photocopies of
contractor's bills, bills for education expenses, documentation of staff time spent on SCORE-
eligible activities, receipts for equipment purchases. and other information to verify eXpenses.
C. Requests for reimbursement may be submitted at any time, but funds will be distributed t9 the
Municipality four times each year, according to the schedule in the table below:
For activities durina the period of:
Reimbursement will occur after:
January 1 - March 31
January 1 - June 30
January 1 - September 30
January 1 - December 31
April 1
July 1
October 1
January 1 of Following Year
Funds will be distributed on the condition that the Municipality is current in submittal of
complete semiannual reports due to the County. In the event that the Municipality's expenses
are less than the amount available to the Municipality pursuant to the Grant Agreement, the
County will reimburse only the eligible amount expended by the Municipality. In the event that
the Municipality's eligible expenses exceed the amount available to the Municipality pursuant to
the Grant Agreement, the County will reimburse only the eligible amount in the Grant
Agreement.
t\)\ FOR CITIES THA T'ENTER INTO A JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT:
A. The Municipality shall receive two payments from the County pursuant to the Joint Powers
Agreement, The first distribution shall occur in late February and shall be in the amount of one
half of the SCORE funds allocated to the Municipality. The second distribution will be in late
May, and shall be for the balance of the funds. The total amount available shall be capped at a
specific amount. The Municipality shall not use grant funds for expenses, or a portion of
expenses, which have been or will be reimbursed by other parties, or for any purposes besides
those approved in the SCORE Funding Agreement and the Joint Powers Agreement, if present.
B. The Municipality shall submit a letter which certifies that the SCORE funds have been used
pursuant to the Joint Powers Agreement and the SCORE Funding Agreement.
,
,
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
~
~
EN HILLS
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
AGENDA ITEM 3.F
October 10, 2002
TO:
Mayor and City Council
Thomas J. Moore, Director of Operations and Maintenance T~ J - ~.
Establishing Annual Service Fee Charge for 2003
Residential Curbside Recycling Program
FROM:
SUBJECT:
BACKGROUND:
The City has established a residential curbside recycling program. Residential property owners
are assessed an annual fee to support this program.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council approve Resolution No. 02-53, A Resolution Establishing the
2003 Service Fee for Residential Curbside Recycling Program.
.
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 02-53
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING SERVICE FEE CHARGE FOR
2003 RESIDENTIAL CURBSIDE RECYCLING PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the City of Arden Hills has an established curbside recycling program in
place for all Arden Hills residents; and
WHEREAS, the City will continue the program into the year 2003, and
WHEREAS, the City Council of Arden Hills has entered into a Joint Powers Agreement
(JP A) with Ramsey County to assess individual residential property owners fees to
support the recycling program; and
WHEREAS, the City of Arden Hills wishes to continue this funding mechanism.
.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Ardeh
Hills, Minnesota:
That the funding rate for residential recycling for the year 2003 is hereby
established at $18.00 per residential parcel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN
HILLS THIS 15tb DAY OF OCTOBER, 2002.
ATTEST:
DENNIS PROBST, MAYOR
JOSEPH P. LYNCH, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
.
~
EN HILLS
e
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
October 10, 2002
AGENDA ITEM 3.G
TO:
SUBJECT:
Mayor and City Council
Cynthia Young, Personnel Director/Deputy Cler~,(;r q.
Trinity Lutheran Church Exempt Gambling Permit
FROM:
BACKGROUND:
e The City of Arden Hills has received ail application from Trinity Lutheran Church for an exempt
gambling permit to host a raftle at its annual Holiday and Bake Sale event charitable raffle. The-
prizes will not exceed the $2,500 limit for the calendar year 2002.
Staff has contacted the State of Minnesota Gambling Control Board concerning the 30-day
advance notice of activity provision. The State Gambling Control Board has waived the 30-day
advance notification provision for this event.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council approve Resolution No. 02-54, A Resolution Approving an
Application for Authorization for an Exempt Gambling Permit for Trinity Lutheran Church.
e
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 02-53
A RESOLUTION
APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR AUTHORIZATION
FOR AN EXEMPT GAMBLING PERMIT
FOR TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby approves the
application for authorization to conduct exempt gambling activities at Trinity Lutheran
Church at its annual Holiday Craft and Bake Sale event to be held November 2, 2002,
with total prizes not exceeding $2,500.00 for the 2002 calendar year.
ADOPTED by the City Council this 15th day of October, 2002.
DENNIS PROBST, MAYOR
ATTEST:
JOE LYNCH, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
e
e
e
r
.
.
.
~
~
EN HILLS
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
6.A
October 9, 2002
Agenda Item
TO:
Mayor Dennis Probst
Council Member Beverly Aplikowski
Council Member David Grant
Council Member Gregg Larson
Council Member Lois Rem
Joe Lynch, City Administrator
Aaron Parrish - Community Services Director ~f
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Fireworks Regulations
ENCLOSURES:
1. Ordinance 342 an ordinance modifying chapter 3 of the City Code
regulating fireworks
Overview
The Lake Johanna Fire Department is requesting that member CitIes consider passing an
ordinance regulating consumer fireworks. More specifically, they are requesting that a license
be required to sell and store fireworks. A first reading and introduction of the ordinance is being
requested for the October 15, 2002 Council meeting. A second reading and adoption of the
ordinance would need to be done at a subsequent meeting.
Requested Action
Consider introduction and first reading of ordinance 342, an ordinance modifying chapter 3 of
the City Code regulating fireworks
r
.
.
.
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
ORDINANCE NO. 342
AN ORDINANCE MODIFYING CHAPTER 3 OF THE CITY CODE REGULATING
FIREWORKS
Section 342.01. General
Subd. 1. Chapter 3 of the Arden Hill City Code is herby amended to include the addition of
section 370 as outlined in Exhibit A of this Ordinance.
Effective Date:
This ordinance shall become effective the day following its
publication.
Adoption Date:
Passed by the City Council of the City of Arden Hills
the 15th day of October 2002.
ATTEST:
DENNIS PROBST, MAYOR
JOSEPH P. LYNCH, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
Appendix A
l
Section 370 - Fireworks
.
370.01 Definitions. For purposes ofthis regulation. the foIlowing terms shaIl mean:
Subd. 1 "Fireworks" means any substance or combination of substances or article prepared
for the purpose of producing a vi8ible or an audible effect by combustion, explosion,
deflagration or detonation, and includes blank cartridges, toy cannons and toy canes in which
explosives are used, any type ofbaIloon which requires fire underneath to propel it,
firecrackers, torpedoes, skyrockets, Roman candles, daygo bombs, or other fireworks of like
construction, and any fireworks containing any explosive or inflanmIable compound, or any
tablet or other device containing any explosive substance and commonly used as fireworks.
Subd. 2 "Consumer fireworks" means toy pistol, toy guns, in which paper caps containing
0.25 grains or less of explosive compound are used and toy pistol caps which contain less
than 0.20 grains of explosive mixture as weIl as wire or wood sparklers of not more than 100
granrs of mixture per item, other than sparkling items which are nonexplosive and nonaerial
and contain less than 75 granrs or less of chemical mixture per tube or a total of 200 granrs or
less for multiple tubes, snakes or glowworms, smoke devises, or trick noisemakers which
include paper streamers, party poppers, string poppers, snappers, and drop pops, each
consisting of not more than twenty-five hundredth grains of explosive mixture. The use of
consumer fireworks is not permitted on public property. This paragraph does not authorize
the purchase of consumer fireworks by persons younger than 18 years of age.
.
370.02 Permit or License Required.
Subd. 1 Fireworks. No person shaIl use or display any fireworks, except as provided herein.
Supervised public displays of fireworks by City, fair associations, anrusement parks and
other organizations other than the City and fair associations must obtain a permit for such
public displays. Such permits shall aIlow the use and display of fireworks for that display
only. No permit so granted shall be transferable.
A. Application. The application shall state the name and address of the person who
will supervise the display, the nanre and address of the person who will conduct
the display, the location of the display, and the date and time of the display.
B. Investigation. The Fire Chief shall investigate each application to determine
whether the operator ofthe display is competent and whether the display will be
of such a character or will be so located, discharged, or fired as to be hazardous to
any person or property.
C. Conditions. Every display shall be conducted so as not to endanger any person
or property. Every display shall be conducted in accordance with all applicable
provisions of this code, state law, and regulations including regulations of the
State Fire Marshall.
.
(
. Subd. 2 Consumer fireworks No person shall, directly or indirectly, keep for retail sale,
sell at retail or otherwise dispose of consumer fireworks unless licensed by the City of Arden
Hills. License application shall be submitted to the City of Arden Hills together with the
license fees as determined from time to time by City Council resolution. A license shall be
issued for the specific premises identified in the application.
A. Application. The applicant shall provide:
(i) The net or gross quantity of explosive material to be kept on the
premises for retail sale or other disposition.
(ii) The interior floor plan of the building showing the place(s) of storage
and/or display.
(iii)The location, type and capacity of sprinkler(s) and fire extinguishers.
(iv)A certificate of Insurance indicating the applicant has liability coverage.
The Certificate must demonstrate the insurer has been notified of the
type and quantity of consumer fireworks kept on the premises.
.
B. Term. A license shall expire on December 31 st of each year.
C. License Restriction. A license shall be issued subject to the following
restrictions:
(i) No transient sales of consumer fireworks are permitted.
(ii) No outdoor sales, storage or retail display of consumer fireworks is
permitted.
(iii)Use of fireworks and consumer fireworks is prohibited on property
where sale and/or storage is permitted.
(iv)Smoking is prohibited within buildings where sale and/or storage of
consumer fireworks is permitted.
(v) A list of consumer fireworks kept on the premises shall be available for
inspection at all times.
(vi)Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) for all consumer fireworks kept on
the premises shall be available for inspection at all times.
.
2
,
(vii) A minimum of two (2) water-type extinguishers, with minimum 2 .
12 gallon capacity shall be kept within 15 feet of the storage and display
area(s).
D. Storage. The licensee shall comply with all applicable provisions of the State of
Minnesota Building and Fire Codes. If there is a conflict between the regulations
ofthe State and the regulations of the City, the more restrictive regulation shall
control.
(i) In buildings without an approved automatic sprinkler system, a
maximum quantity of fifty (50) pounds net pyrotechnic composition or
two hundred (200) pounds gross weight, if the pyrotechnic composition
is not known, may be kept on the premises.
(ii) In buildings with an approved automatic sprinkler system, a maximum
quantity of one hundred (100) pounds net pyrotechnic composition of
four hundred (400) pounds gross weight, if the pyrotechnic composition
is not known, may be kept on the premises.
E. Inspections. The premises shall be inspected at least twice annually by the Fire
Chief to verify compliance with the terms and conditions of the license.
.
.
3
.
~
~HILLS
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
October 10, 2002
Agenda Item 6.B
TO:
Mayor Dennis Probst
Council Member Beverly Aplikowski
Council Member David Grant
Council Member Gregg Larson
Council Member Lois Rem
Joe Lynch, City Administrator
FROM:
Aaron Parrish, Community Services Director
Ii
SUBJECT: TCAAP Update
The following highlights pertinent TCAAP reuse activities since the last Council meeting:
. Staff had a meeting with the Development Teanr on Tuesday October 8, 2002. The Development Teanr
indicated that the federal screening process has not formally been initiated at this point, but it is anticipated
to begin at some point in the near future.
· On Tuesday October 8, 2002, staff had a meeting with Ranrsey County Parks and the DNR to discuss the 49
acre Wildlife Corridor. While a number of issues were discussed, a majority of the conversation revolved
around any potential transportation connection through the wildlife corridor area. As Council may recall,
the primer tracer area, an area identified for disposition, is landlocked between National Guard property, the
wildlife corridor, and the Rice Creek corridor. At a meeting in August, the DNR had indicated that it would
be acceptable to have a road through the wildlife corridor under certain circumstances. At this meeting,
they indicated that it was their preference not to have a road through the wildlife corridor. However,
Ranrsey County did indicate they would explore the possibility with the National Guard of providing access
to the primer tracer area from the north.
This item will be discussed further at the November Work Session since including the wildlife corridor in
the park requires an anrendment to the park master plan. Generally speaking, cities are required to make the
determination that these types of anrendments are consistent with the city's approved Comprehensive Plan.
· On Thursday October 11, 2002 staff had a meeting with John Shardlow, DSU, to discuss the current status
of the master planning. Approximately half of the first phase work is completed at this point. We also
discussed the first meeting of the Advisory Panel which has tentatively been set for November 19th, 2002.
.
.
.
.
~
~
EN HILLS
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
AGENDA ITEM 8.A
October 4, 2002
TO:
Mayor and City Council
Cynthia Young, Personnel Director/Deputy Clerk~
Joe Lynch, City Administrator
Aaron Parrish, Director of Community Services
Terry Post, City Accountant/Treasurer
FROM:
CC:
SUBJECT:
Appointment of Sandra Byl to Regular Employment Status
BACKGROUND
On February 25, 2002 Sandra Byl began working for the City of Arden Hills as the part-time
Customer Service Representative II.
Ms. Byl has completed her six-month training period. Per the Arden Hills Personnel Policy, Ms.
Byl was evaluated at the end of that period and her performance has been satisfactory.
RECOMMENDATION
Per the Personnel Policy of the City of Arden Hills, staff recommends that the City Council
appoint Sandra Byl on a regular, part-time basis.
.
~
~HILLS
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
Agenda Item 8.B
October 11, 2002
TO:
Mayor Dennis Probst
Council Member Beverly Aplikowski
Council Member David Grant
Council Member Gregg Larson
Council Member Lois Rem
Joe Lynch, City Administrator
Aaron Parrish, Community Services Director /rf
FROM:
SUBJECT: TCAAP Master Planning Advisory Panel
The candidates for the TCAAP Master Planning Advisory Panel Community Representative
seats have been ranked by the Council in the foIlowing manner:
. #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 TOTAL
Fran Holmes, 1804 Venus Avenue 9 2 2 1 2 16
Lyle Salmela, 1480 Arden Vista Court 3 1 5 4 5 18
David Dudycha, 1226 Ingerson Road 6 6 4 5 1 22
Thomas Mulcahy, 3530 Siems Court 2 4 7 3 8 24
Roberta Thompson, 3413 Snelling Avenue N. 5 3 10 2 9 29
Roger Aiken, 4360 Hamline Avenue 11 8 1 9 3 32
Elwood Caldwell, 1451 Arden View Drive 4 9 8 8 6 35
Sharon Klumpp, 1278 Wyncrest Lane 1 7 11 6 12 37
Steven Freimuth, 1200 Ingerson Road 10 10 3 11 4 38
Ray McGraw, 1427 Bussard Court 8 12 9 7 7 43
Edward Werner, 1758 Crystal Avenue 12 5 6 12 10 45
Gretchen Hesli, 4434 Pleasant Drive 7 11 12 10 11 51
.
TOTAL Ranking: Lowest Score = Most Qualified; Highest Score = Least Qualified
If the Council is concurrence with interviewing the top six candidates, staff could set up
interviews for the October 21'" 2002 Work Session. The Council had previously discussed
appointing four Community Representatives in addition to the Planning Commission, two PTRC
members, and the Business Representative. For reference, a representative from Guidant has
agreed to serve as a business representative.
It is anticipated that the Council will consider appointing the full Advisory Panel at their October
28,2002 meeting. The first meeting for the Advisory Panel is tentatively set for November 19,
2002.
Requested Action
Provide direction on the selection and/or interviewing of candidates for the TCAAP Master
Planning Advisory Panel.
.
.
~
~
EN HILLS
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
AGENDA ITEM 8.C
October 10, 2002
TO:
Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Joe Lynch, City Administrato
SUBJECT:
Metropolitan Council Redistricting
ENCLOSURE:
Metropolitan Council Redistricting Cover Letter and Alternatives
. BACKGROUND:
.
The state is required to redraw the boundaries for each of the Metropolitan Council Districts.
This needs to happen every ten years and is based upon the 2000 Census.
The Metropolitan Council has provided three options for you to consider.
Alternative 1 aligns Arden Hills with the surrounding communities of Shore view, Mounds View,
New Brighton and Vadnais Heights.
Alternative 2 aligns Arden Hills in a district with a portion of the City of Minneapolis.
Alternative 3 aligns Arden Hills with the cities of Coon Rapids, Fridley and Spring Lake Park.
The Council will hold a meeting to take public comments on these alternatives. The public can
also give their input through a public comments line or e-mail.
Action
The Council should decide if it wants to support one of the proposed alternatives and if so, feed
that back to the Metropolitan Council through official correspondence.
~M~~~~it~=~~
r=R
"""'1
.
SEP 3 0 2002
September 27, 2002
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
To: Local Units of Government in the Metropolitan Area
Re: Proposed Plans for Metropolitan Council Redistricting
The Metropolitan Council invites you to comment on three proposed plans for redistricting the sixteen Council
districts.
Minnesota Statntes 473.123, Subd. 3a states "the legislatnre shall redraw the boundaries of the council districts
after each dicennial federal census so that each district has substantially equal population." Redistricting is to
take place for the Metropolitan Council each ten years in the year ending with the number "3". Prior to the 1993
legislative session, the Metropolitan Council submitted a redistricting proposal that was adopted by the
Legislatnre. In keeping with that precedent the Council intends to submit a redistricting recommendation in the
2003 session.
For the past few months a Metropolitan Council Redistricting Advisory Group has been meeting for the purpose
of making a recommendation on new Metropolitan Council districts based on the 2000 census. The advisory
group established several factors as criteria. These include:
. Minimize the splitting of suburban communities.
. Keep each district of substantially equal population.
. Retain two districts entirely with the municipal boundaries of Minneapolis.
... Retain one district entirely with the municipal boundaries of St. Paul.
Group communities locally that have some common subregional interests.
Prior to the Redistricting Advisory Group (consisting of Council members and public representatives) making a
final plan recommendation to the Metropolitan Council, the Redistricting Advisory Group is seeking public
comment on three proposals that subtantially meet the redistricting principles. The three plans are available on
the Council website at httD:/Iwww.metrocouncil.or<l/resourceslresources,htm Go to this link and then scroll down to the
"General" category and click on "Redistricting Proposals" to view these maps. District descriptions and
population information on each district is included in this mailing. If you do not have internet access and wish
copies of the maps please call the Council's Data Center at 651-602-1140.
A public comment meeting will be held on Thursday, October 10,2002 at 3 p.m. in Room lA oftbe
Metropolitan Council offices at Mears Park Centre, 230 E. Fifth Street, St. Panl, Minnesota. As alternative
ways to comment, persons may call the Council's public comment line at (651)602-1500 and leave a recorded
message or e-mail theCouncil.sDataCenteratdata.center@metc.state.mn.us regarding the three redistricting
proposals. Written comments may also be faxed to (651) 602-1464. All comments will be accepted until 5 p.m.,
October II, 2002.
Your comments on the proposed plans are greatly appreciated. The Metropolitan Council tentatively plans to
make a final recommendation at its meeting on October 23.
Sincerely,
f1(~~~
. Marc Hugunin
Chair, Metropolitan Council Redistricting Advisory Group
And Metropolitan Council Member, District 14
www.metrocouncil.org
Metro Info Line 602-1888
230 East Fifth Street . St. Paul, Minnesota 55101.1626 . (651)602-1000 . Fax 602-1550 . TrY 291-0904
Au Equal Opportunity Employer
Metropolitan Council Redistricting
Example Plan Notes
.
The redistricting plans on the folIowing pages are examples of plans that demonstrate the
goals of the committee: communities of interest, ideal population and compactness. The
plans also seek to minimize the number of municipalities split outside of Minneapolis and
St. Paul, and to maximize the minority population in two districts.
Some observations have come up regarding the committee's wishes for redistricting, which
may prove helpful in future decision making:
1. A compact southwestern district composed entirely of Carver and Scott counties has a
population of 156,546, or 5.05% below the ideal. Adding smalI communities such as
Minnetrista and St. Bonifacious can bring the district to under 3% deviation. However,
the key to this district is the inclusion of Chanhassen. Without it, significant parts of
Hennepin or Dakota County (at least 23,705 people) must be included to stay under 3%
deviation. This means the district must have part of LakevilIe, Burnsville, Bloomington,
or Eden Prairie - or several suburban city/township combinations.
2. To have two districts completely within Minneapolis and in the 3% deviation range, the
remaining Minneapolis district(s) must contain all or part of at least two cities (or part
of Saint Paul) totaling approximately 100,000 people. In other words, this difference
can not be made up with just Richfield (or Richfield and Fort Snelling), which has less
than 35,000 people.
.
Dotion 1 2 3
OveralI Population
Deviation <5% <3% <3%
Number of Split 0 0 2
Municipalities I
Minority Percentage in
District 7 55.32% 55.32% 54.86%
Minority Percentage in
District 14 36.26% 36.26% 42.18%
.
1 Outside of Minneapolis and St. Paul
.
.
.
Public Comment Option 1 District Descriptions
District 1 - Western Hennepin County. Includes Champlin, Dayton, Hassan, Rogers, Maple Grove, Plymoul
Medicine Lake, Corcoran, Medina, Loretta, Maple Plain, Independence, Greenfield, and Rockford.
District 2 ~ Northeastern Hennepin County. Includes Osseo, Brooklyn Park, Brooklyn Center, Robbinsdale,
New Hope, and Crystal.
District 3 - Lake Mlnnetonka. Includes Edina, Hopkins, Minnetonka, Wayzata, Woodland, Deephaven,
Greenwood, Excelsior, Shorewood, Minnetonka Beach, Tanka Bay, Spring Park, Mound, Victoria,
Minnetrista, St. Bonifacius, Orono, and Long Lake.
District 4 - Most of Carver County, most of Scott County, and Lakeville.
District 5 - Chanhassen, Eden Prairie, and Bloomington.
District 6 - Golden Valley, St. Louis Park, Richfield, Fort Snelling, and southwestern Minneapolis.
District 7- Downtown and North Minneapolis, portion of South Minneapolis_
District 8 - Eastern and most of South Minneapolis.
District 9 - Northern Anoka County. Includes Northeast Ramsey County, Forest Lake, Lino Lakes,
CenterviIle, and Anoka County north of Anoka.
District 10 - Southern Anoka County. Includes Anoka, Coon Rapids, Blaine, Circle Pines, Lexington,
Spring Lake Park, and Fridley_
District 11 - Greater Ramsey County. Includes North 81. Paul, Maplewood, Little Canada, Vadnais
Heights, Gem Lake, Shoreview, Arden Hills, Mounds View, New Brighton, St. Anthony, Columbia
Heights and Hilllop.
District 12 - Washington County. Includes all municipalities except St. Paul Park, Grey Cloud Island Twp.,
Newport, Denmark Township, Afton, and Forest Lake.
District 13 - Southern half of Saint Paul.
District 14 - Northern half of Saint Paul, Roseville, Lauderdale, and Falcon Heights,
District 15 - Eagan, Bumsville, and Apple Valley.
District 16 - Dakota County. Includes most of northern and eastern Dakota County, Newport, St. Paul Park,
Grcy Cloud Island, Denmark Twp. Afton, Elko, New Market, and New Markct Twp.
Plan Minority Percentages
o-iSi.~tm!P01~~:~1~%26~~~~IYI
l~j=~T~i~r~iif1~O~i~~j
~___.~.,__~----.J 60.5171__122.170 J
1--..2'..__, 160,~~55.32Yo I
L-.--~_~ 160,2?2~ 24,64% I
~____9 : 167.12!L~~.~___~
L__~g__L._"_~5. 7~~L-250!~_.,._j
i 11 I 167,9531 9.96% i
i 12 , '"1j3.057i'~6~76%---1
[.~~~~):. "" t-n -.--~','~~-~~~~l 2~-._~~'%"'-":
L __._ _~4__._!?,~-,~~: 36.26% i
..___.~~_. +_ ____~?~!_~_'?~j __1_)__:.~_~_!.o
16 160,0581 6.38%
Public Comment Option 2 District Descriptions
District 1 - Plymouth, Medicine Lake, Maple Grove, and Minnetonka.
.
District 2 -Brooklyn Center, Robbinsdale, Crystal, New Hope, Golden Valley, St. Louis Park, and
Hopkins.
District 3 - Western Suburbs. Includes most Lake Minnctonka Communities, Eden Paririe, Chanhassen,
Victoria, Chaska, Chaska Twp., Laketown Twp. Watertown Twp. Watertown. Independence, Maple Plain,
Medina, and Loretta.
District 4 ~ Southwestern Metro. Includes most of Carver County, all of Scott County, and Bumsville.
District 5 - Bloomington, Edina, Richfield, and Fort Snelling.
District 6 - Most of South Minneapolis.
District 7 - Downtown and North Minneapolis, portion of South Minneapolis.
District 8 - Minneapolis east of the river, Columbia Heights, St. Anthony, Hilltop, New Brighton, Arden
Hills, Mounds View, Spring Lake Park, and Fridley,
District 9 - Blaine. Coon Rapids, Lexington, Andover, Ham Lake, Columbus Twp., East Bethel, and
Linwood Twp.
District 10 ~ Brooklyn Park. Osseo, Champlin, Anoka, Ramsey, Burns Twp., Oak Grove. St. Francis,
Bethel. Dayton, Hassan. Rogers, Corcoran, Greenfield. and Rockford.
District 11 - Ramsey County. Includes most of Suburban Ramsey County, Lino Lakes, Centerville, and
Circle Pines.
District 12 ~ Washington County. Includes all municipalities except Cottage Grove, Newport, St. Paul
Park, and Grey Cloud Island Twp. .
.
District 13 - Southern half of Saint Paul.
District 14 - Northern half of Saint Paul, Roseville, Lauderdale, and Falcon Heights.
District 15 - Dakota County north of Apple Valley. Includes Rosemount, Newport, St. Paul Park, and Grey
Cloud Island Twp.
District 16 -Dakota County south of Rosemount. Includes Cottage Grove, Nininger Twp., Hastings, and
Apple Valley.
Plan Minority Percentages
-Distrlci --fPopulatTon TDj~-rvfil'loritYl
_"_.'__'__'__'. ._.....j_._......... _____.._..''_~.___. !..._. .-''',_' ----....------".".1
._+..--\.i~H~-~1--1~6:;;~-1
_~..__..____._....,.....,'m...,....,..,,,.__..,,._........_.l......,........''''---.-.'.-.'''''1
=~-t:~iif~~?i]
6 I 160,4251 19.87% !
... ......1 --.---.-..T -.----,
7.. ,160,612155:32%j
..___._.~-~.~_"...1",,~_~_67~~[...i~.~.~_~?_j
__~~ 167,~27j_.2.4~1'o..J
10 ! 163,4691 14.29% i
. . ...IT--'-160,Z"16!-7:60'1.
i
12 161 ;10Z": .6:34%
f3 . "T"""-""-f65:228j'2.{63o/~
--- -""'--'" ,-..-,----.........--..."j-......--.-,-...... ",,---
14 i 163,5491 36.26%
15-- --169~278T--~i59%- :
16 165.526\ 5.78% '
.
.
.
.
Public Comment Option 3 District Descriptions
District 1 - Western Hennepin County. Includes Champlin, Dayton, Hassan, Rogers, Maple Grove,
Plymouth, Medicine Lake, Corcoran, Medina, Loretto, Maple Plain, Independence, Greenfield, and
Rockford.
District 2 - Northeastern Hennepin County. Includes Osseo, Brooklyn Park, Brooklyn Center, Robbinsdale,
New Hope, Crystal, and part of North Minneapolis.
District 3 - Lake Minnetonka. Includes Edina, Hopkins, Minnetonka, Wayzata, Woodland, Deephaven,
Greenwood, Excelsior, Shore wood, Minnetonka Beach, Tanka Bay, Spring Park, Mound, Minnetrista, St.
Bonifacius, Orono, and Long Lake.
District 4 - Carver and Scott Counties, except for Chanhassen and including part of Lakcville.
District 5 - Chanhassen, Eden Prairie, and Bloomington.
District 6 - Golden Valley, St. Louis Park, Richfield, and southwestern Minneapolis.
District 7 - Downtown and North Minneapolis, portions of South Minneapolis.
District 8 - Eastern and southern Minneapolis, Columbia Heights, Hilltop, and S1. Anthony_
District 9 - Northern Anoka County. Includes Blaine Lexington, Circle Pines, Anoka, and all
municipalities north of these.
District 10 - Coon Rapids, Fridley, Spring Lake Park, Mounds View, New Brighton, Arden Hills, and
Shoreview.
District 11 - Ramsey County. Includes eastern suburban Ramsey County, Roseville, Lauderdale, Falcon
Heights, Lino Lakes, and Centerville.
District 12 - Washington County. Includes all municipalities except Denmark, Cottage Grove, Grey Cloud
Island, and S<. Paul Park.
District J3 ~ Southern half of St. Paul, West S1. Paul, MendOla, Mendota Heights, Lilydale, Fort Snelling
and part of Maple wood.
District 14 - Northern halfofSt. PauL
District)5 - Eagan, Bumsville, and Apple Valley.
District )6 - Dakota County. Contains most of Dakota County as well as St. Paul Park, Grey Cloud Island
Twp., Cottage Grove, and Denmark.
Plan Minority Percentages
[-~~.f~!~~!-'---l:~.?ii~f~!I?_~I!~~.!~E~?_~!)1
11.... .1.~.67.77"16-,!5o/,,-~
l----.--~~'.-~-.r..---"~ :~:~~~I ~~1~3oZo '1
r--4..-I..~56'546p.38% ~.J
L..._5...+...174,5!~ 19,1",% j
i 6 , 167.666, 11.80% i
'---'~~~---.\----._..._--- _..--_....-.~1
r . ... .~.I-.. ~~~:~~~ .~H~~ I
!-----"~._-.-.--i-- -0-_- -----0--'-..[
: -- ---l~O--_.-+--"-~::~;~ ~~~.~~ I
i----11---r~-"' 166.251" -9:04%~--:
r~--12~-_.._~t-._-162-::i37' .-6-:41o/~" '.-1
.--:-TFr.1~:t~~n~~~~=i
15 169:-304r:fl:13070--1
. __ ___.~_~_ l~~~~~~L_-__5~.~~%-
MeD Population: Alphabetical Listing
IMCD Population 1 IMCD POSij IMCD Population 1
IAfton 2,8391 lSluk"RZ? lNorth Oaks 3.8831
Grey Cloud Island towns 307 'fL ,
, ,,' ',~'"-~ 3.1081
Anoka 18,07~ ~%fjJ'lllfJl~"".~ I Norwo,2,d Young America
/.' . ....... A!Jiliifi2t,_ _~~ ili07E"'._ '=,",,_ _
, " Hamburg. 538 l'Oak 'Park Heights '
IArden Hills 9.652 rHamPt~nlownship . 3,9571
I Baytown towns~ip 1~533 IHassant~1~;.~63 1,0rono 7.5381
, ,
ISelle Plaine township , Il"ine Springs 4211
806
rBell1el IHelena township 1,440 [Prior Lake
443 15.9171
IHollywood townShip 1,102
IBlaine 44,9421 I Randoloh 3181
IHugo 6.3631
IBloomington 85.1721 [Ravenna township 2.3551
Ilnver Grove Heights 29.7511
I Brooklvn Park 67.3881 I Robbinsdale 14.1231
IJordan 3,8331
Burnsville 60.2201 [ Rogers 3,5881
1 Lake SI. Croix Beach 1.141l1
Carver 1.266\ I Roseville 33.6901
1 Lakeland Shores 3551
ICedar Lake township 2.1971 , I SI. Bonifacius 1,8731
1 Lakevllle 43.1281
IChamplin 22.1931 I SI. Lawrence townShip 4721
I Lauderdale 2.3641
I Chaska 17,4491 Isl. Mary's Point 3441
IUlydaie 552
ICircle Pines 4.6631 Isl. Paul Park 5.0761
IUnwo?d township 4.668
1 Cologne 1,0121 I Sand Creek township 1.5511
Long lake 1.8421
IColumbus township 3.9571 ISciOla township 2851
I Louisville township 1.3591
I Corcoran 5,6301 I Shoreview 25.9241
1 Maole Grove 50,3651
ICredit River township 3.8951 1 South SI. Paul 20.1671
I Maplewood 34.9471
Dahlgren township 1,4531 I Spring Lake township 3.6811
!Marshan township 1.2631 [Stillwater
IDeephaven 3.8531 15.1431
1 Mayer 5541
IDenmark township 1,348\ ISunfish Lake 5041
IMedlna 4.0051
I Eagan 63,5571 IVadnals Heights 13.0691
IMendola Heights 11,434
IEden Prairie 54.9011 rMinneapolis !Vermillion township 1.2431
382.618
IElko 4721 IWaconia 6.8141
Minnetonka Beach 614
[Eureka township 1,4901 IWaterford township 5171
Mound ~.4351
IFalcon HeightS 5.5721 IWatertown township 1,432[
I New BrightOn 22.2061
I Forest Lake 6,7g81 IWest Lakeland township 3.547\
1 New Hope 20,8731
~~ 27.4491 IWhlte Bear Lake 24.3251
-..."" (};Jew Market township 3,057
,., IWillemie ,;>49J
Golden Valley 20.281 -. !il~'fII!~
:"..~ m. .. .
~lillllill..IIIIlJIJl~ INewTrier 116
Greenfield 2,~ , '8651 IWoodland . 4801
?,~-,:.._.. - IN ininoer . .
.
.
.
"f'W!kfl cm~$; M~tI'QPQm3ft AI'~il
Metropolitan Council District Example Plan:
Public Comment Option 1
.
District
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Population % Deviation
167,774
156,688
167,788
171,467
160.394
160.517
160.612
160.777
167,121
165.723
167,953
173,057
165,228
163,549
169,304
160.058
1.76%
-4,97%
1,77%
4,00%
-2,72%
-2,64%
-2,59%
-2.49%
1.36%
0.51%
1.87%
4.96%
0.21%
-0.80%
2.69%
-2.92%
1..,.,..\ "<>""1",,..,,,
1$4,U$
.
~
.
1+' l\f!trol'olltlln l:.:oulI<:I1
-'L~l1.n.,,")IJm,lr\:..M..f
This plan splits no municipalities outside of Minneapolis and Saint Paul.
Districts have up to 5% variation in population, but preserve several communities of interest
Public Comment Option 1 District Descriptions
.
District 1 - Western Hennepin County. Includes Champlin, Dayton, Hassan, Rogers, Maple Grove, Plymou1
Medicine Lake, Corcoran, Medina, Loretto, Maple Plain, Independence, Greenfield, and Rockford.
District 2 - Northeastern Hennepin County. Includes Osseo, Brooklyn Park, Brooklyn Center, Robbinsdale,
New Hope, and Crystal.
District 3 - Lake Minnetonka. Includes Edina, Hopkins, Minnetonka, Wayzata, Woodland, Deephaven,
Greenwood, Excelsior, Shorewood, Minnetonka Beach, Tanka Bay, Spring Park, Mound, Victoria,
Minnetrista, St. Bonifacius, Orono, and Long Lake.
District 4 - Most of Carver County, most of Scott County, and Lakeville.
District 5 ~ Chanhassen, Eden Prairie, and Bloomington.
District 6 - Golden Valley, St. Louis Park, Richfield, Fort Snelling, and southwestern Minneapolis.
District 7- Downtown and North Minneapolis, portion of South Minneapolis.
District 8 - Eastern and most of South Minneapolis.
District 9 _ Northern Anoka County. Includes Northeast Ramsey County, Forest Lake, Lino Lakes,
Centerville, and Anoka County north of Anoka.
District 10 - Southern Anoka County. Includes Anoka, Coon Rapids, Blaine, Circle Pines, Lexington,
Spring Lake Park, and Fridley.
District 11 - Greater Ramsey County. Includes North St. Paul, Maplewood, Little Canada, Vadnais
Heights, Gem Lake, Shoreview, Arden Hills, Mounds View, New Brighton, St. Anthony, Columbia
Heights and Hilltop.
.
District 12 - Washington County. Includes all municipalities except St. Paul Park, Grey Cloud Island Twp.,
Newport, Denmark Township, Afton, and Forest Lake.
District 13 - Southern half of Saint Paul.
District 14 - Northern halfofSaint Paul, Roseville, Lauderdale, and Falcon Heights.
District 15 - Eagan, Bumsville, and Apple Valley.
District 16 - Dakota County. Includes most of northern and eastern Dakota County, Newport, St. Paul Park,
Grey Cloud Island, Denmark Twp. Afton, Elko, New Market, and New Market Twp.
Plan Minority Perceotages
r:~::g75trlc~.-1~pulation ~orii~
i 1 I 167.774 6.15% .
1""2" I 156.688 22.14%~
! 3 ! 167,788 6.03%
, 4'1'~'17T.467 5,69%-1
1--5--1=='160.394 10.15% ,
C':-(='I"'160.517 1131o/~1
~~__~______J 160.612' 55:.~_~~~__
~___~_________+__ _,16~.. 777 24.640!~__
: 9 I 167.121 3.69%
)-___..~_.~._.____ ---..-1
i 10 I 165,723 7.50% i
!. 11 1_ ,~,E?,!,,~~~~__ 9.96% I
1....13.._--l. _. _,.173..0~7 6.76% I
r4~-----l----~-~~:~~: ~::~~~~---I
L-. 1t?_M~'_,l., 169.304111.13~(I_,.~
~__~~__~_t?g_,~~~___~~~8% I
.
e
District
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
.
..
TWill em"'$ MlillrQPQ{ftan Al'Ita
Metropolitan Council District Example Plan:
Public Comment Option 2
Population % Deviation
167,928
168,418
161,433
168.025
167.478
160.425
160.612
167,696
167,627
163,469
160.216
161,102
165,228
163.549
169.278
165,526
1''''.11'>1 "<I!>lllatio,,,,
1U"tn~
1.85%
2.15%
-2.09%
1.91%
1.58%
-2.70%
-2.59%
1.71%
167%
-0,85%
-2,83%
-2.29%
0.21%
-0.80%
2.67%
0,39%
..-----T~'
i
~ II:fe!':2l'oll!"" .CCou_...~!1
...~. &l2i'nt':toiNn11'!,'l<? ~J,.1.Of'1!
This plan splits no municipalities outside of Minneapolis and Saint Paul.
Districts have up to 3% variation in population, but preserve sevcral communities of intercst
Public Comment Option 2 District Descriptions
e
District I - Plymouth, Medicine Lake, Maple Grove, and Minnetonka.
District 2 -Brooklyn Center, Robbinsdale, Crystal, New Hope, Golden Valley, St. Louis Park, and
Hopkins.
District 3 - Western Suburbs. Includes most Lake Minnetonka Communities, Eden Paririe, Chanhassen,
Victoria, Chaska, Chaska Twp., Laketown Twp. Watertown Twp. Watertown. Independence, Maple Plain,
Medina, and Loretto.
District 4 - Southwestern Metro. Includes most of Carver County, all of Scott County, and Burnsville.
District 5 - Bloomington, Edina, Richfield, and Fort Snelling.
District 6 - Most of South Minneapolis.
District 7 - Downtown and North Minneapolis, portion of South Minneapolis.
District 8 - Minneapolis east of the river, Columbia Heights, St. Anthony, Hilltop, New Brighton, Arden
Hills, Mounds View, Spring Lake Park, and Fridley.
District 9 - Blaine, Coon Rapids, Lexington, Andover, Ham Lake, Columbus Twp., East Bethel, and
Linwood Twp.
District 10 - Brooklyn Park, Osseo, Champlin, Anoka, Ramsey, Bums Twp., Oak Grove, St. Francis,
Bethel, Dayton, Hassan, Rogers, Corcoran, Greenfield, and Rockford.
District 11 _ Ramsey County. Includes most of Suburban Ramsey County, Lino Lakes, Centerville, and
Circle Pines.
District 12 _ Washington County. Includes all municipalities except Cottage Grove, Newport, S1. Paul
Park, and Grey Cloud Island Twp.
e
District 13 - Southern half of Saint Paul.
District 14 ~ Northern half of Saint Paul, Roseville, Lauderdale, and Falcon Heights.
District 15 _ Dakota County north of Apple Valley. Includes Rosemount, Newport, St. Paul Park, and Grey
Cloud Island Twp.
District 16 ~Dakota County south of Rosemount. Includes Cottage Grove, Nininger Twp., Hastings, and
Apple Valley.
Plan Minority Percentages
Distric:(J,~()p~_I~~~m '%!Y1J~~!~
-}J. ;~~~~~~ 16.;6::toj
3 I 161,4:3.3 5.71% '
4 .1168.025 8. 08'%
._~_ I' 167.478 11.53%
6 160,425 19.87%
i~~=l 160.6.1~ j;~32% i
.m. 8... ._167,696 14,360/01
~__~_. ; 167,6~I ?.43% 1
_~J 163,469.14,2.90/0.~
11 i 160,216 7.60%.
---12""-1--'161.102 6.34%-
._~_._...~.._..~.~! ~ ~-- ---.--..,....-i
^~.~~_! 165!22~ ~_~_~.63% I
14 1163.549 36.26% ,
'-15---~-r- 169,278; 9.--590/0--1
. .--.,'.--.-... "'-, i
16 i 165,5261 5.7~~~.__",.J
.
.
District
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
.
.
e
1iWhl, CWe.s MetfO#l'olltan Af1ila
Metropolitan Council District Example Plan:
Public Comment Option 3
Population
167,774
162,138
163,763
167,257
160,394
167,411
166,218
169,683
163.082
166,348
164,396
163,820
163,548
162,141
169,304
160,733
% Deviation
1.76%
-1.66%
-0.67%
1.44%
-2.72%
1,54%
0.81%
2.92%
-1,09%
0.89%
-0.29%
-0.64%
-0.81%
-1.66%
2,69%
-2.51%
l''''!I~; !,Q,,,~l";l"'n'
~M.Uil
W lId'~~I'o~<>.lit.,,-.. :Council
Jj~1Io:..ll:.\'.t.~1Iuj~ri
This plan splits two municipalities outside of Minneapolis and Saint Paul: Lakeville and Maplewood.
Districts have up to 3% variation in population, but preserve several communities of interest.
Public Comment Option 3 District Descriptions
.
District I - Western Hennepin County. Includes Champlin, Dayton, Hassan, Rogers, Maple Grove,
Plymouth, Medicine Lake, Corcoran, Medina, Loretta, Maple Plain, Independence, Greenfield, and
Rockford.
District 2 - Northeastern Hennepin County. Includes Osseo, Brooklyn Park, Brooklyn Center, Robbinsdale,
New Hope, Crystal, and part of North Minneapolis.
District 3 -- Lake Minnetonka. Includes Edina, Hopkins, Minnetonka, Wayzata, Woodland, Deephaven,
Greenwood, Excelsior, Shorcwood, Minnetonka Beach, Tanka Bay, Spring Park, Mound, Minnetrista, St.
Bonifacius, Orono, and Long Lake.
District 4 - Carver and Scott Counties, except for Chanhassen and including part of Lakeville.
District 5 - Chanhassen, Eden Prairie, and Bloomington.
District 6 - Golden Valley, 81. Louis Park, Richfield, and southwestern Minneapolis.
District 7 - Downtown and North Minneapolis, portions of South Minneapolis.
District 8 - Eastern and southern Minneapolis, Columbia Heights, Hilltop, and St. Anthony.
District 9 - Northern Anoka County. Includes Blaine Lexington, Circle Pines, Anoka, and all
municipalities north of these.
District 10 _ Coon Rapids, Fridley, Spring Lake Park, Mounds View. New Brighton, Arden Hills, and
Shoreview.
District 11 - Ramsey County. Includes eastern suburban Ramsey County, Roseville, Lauderdale, Falcon
Heights, Lino Lakes, and CcntervilIe.
District 12 _ Washington County. Includes all municipalities except Denmark, Cottage Grove, Grey Cloud
Island, and St. Paul Park.
.
District 13 - Southern halfofSt. Paul, West St. Paul, Mendota, Mendola Heights, Lilydale, Fort Snelling
and part of Maple wood.
District 14 - Northern halfof8t. Paul.
District 15 - Eagan, Bumsville, and Apple Valley.
District 16 - Dakota County. Contains most of Dakota County as well as S1. Paul Park, Grcy Cloud Island
Twp., Cottage Grove, and Denmark.
Plan Minority Percentages
R~01i:~~~ %;::!;~1
1__ 3 I 163,7l):J+n"J~
: 4 156,5461 5.38% ;
f~~-fi[ ~~f
f 9 i 168.913 4.54%
i----10 ! ___!.~,ojo. 8.46% j
_~~.:!__~_ 166,251 9.l~~% ~~j
i 12 i 162,?::3:?13:.:1:1% j
i 13 I 156,596 i8.350~O I
t=. ,~J-___162,14i" --_~~l8%
15 I 169,304 11.130/0 ,
I - -.-- .---..,.......--..----..---..-... --- --~-..-...-..----- 1
_ _~_~_._~____!..5_9.~_3..? 5.98% j
e
.
)>
,
a.
'"
::>
I
if>
.
-<
;:0
'"
'0
o
;:,.
X
if>
tit
<0
'"
-l
o
~
r-
I ~IWlli.,f::..""""""""",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,:,,:,,
,......Iw ...... 01 ...... ...... CD (() ...... CO ...... (0'
~'~~ t3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Z [;;" <:;: I I O,Gl I Z:::;: Gl~.
3Q ",^ *'p..,5 S ~ m s g. 9l. ~ q
::Jc.-+.....-....--c.--.--.-
Q) c.........:::I CD CD ::T"'O (t) CD 0 "'O!)>
o 5"~ ~'~ ID ill ~ ~:::I m,~
)>'::T '" CJ 0 0.3 !:. 0 a. 'lJ !:. a.
cB ~jo~ 0 o'~)>o.. :-)>(i:
~ m. g~~,~ ~lff'! ~ g:
~~
:<17 {A -69 {J7 -EA-Efl f;fl {fl:-Ef} (fl {J7 ffi:~
. .,
, -
I\.) NW WW CD
(00) Q)'-..J -..Jma w woo m >-
C1CO-....J-....JmrnoQ).,f::..oom3
<090.,f::..?'.l~~"""000CJ10
! NOOCO,l::..wo~Cnbo~!:
I ~o,~ O..<O,~_~ O.IDi~ a O.Cia
-Efll(fl -€A (fl -E:f) -E,A:-E,A ffi y} (fl f:fl {fl -Ii
! ...... ...... 2.;
I\,) N......, W 0 ~
..p. m 0>'....... -..J <.0 C'W I\,) ,I::.. to ()1 -
en Co .......r'".....J'm ~ '"0 a Co bt 0, 0, "tJ
~ g g ~ ~ 0; g ~ :$ ~ ~i~ 0
0(:) 0 to miQ 0 ~ Co ~ b o,~
000 W co 0,0 ...... 0 ..... 0 0 _
."
~
OIl
00
....
....
:...
'"
."
'"
""
OIl
00
'"
~
:...
'"
::;:CJ::;:CJ::;:)>IUJI;:O:;:I
-. ~. -- (t) _. ~ < ~ (t) CD ID (t)
:::l<:Jc):Ja~:rS.3~~
g.~ g.;:K;'"g-::t.OlC ::5'0 CD 5'
~Q):E :Eg~ lCg.~fO~
((.1':< Ul C/J 6:: -COI &.
a. wa. 'CD'
I g ~ a a
::> _ 0
::T3
g "U
3 Q
'" "
- ::T
'lJ
!ll. Gl
::> OJ
im
0<0
,- '"
;:0
'"
I[
::>
5-
<0
c
'"
'"
n
...
[
o'
::>
::;:
m,
, , 0
5:2 ~ CD ~:::::!. ~ ~ ~ 0') :f:::'.I::o. ~ 0"
~o~~t3~~~~oo~~!!.
t:3,,>Ni\3i\3i\3tJl\3l\.)i\3f\.)i\3:2
o 0 0 ~
ggogggggogo8c
N I\.) N N N N N N,f\.) l\,) N N l>>
.-
'"
I
;:0;:0;:0;:00;:0;:0;:0;:0;:0;:0
~ ~ ~ ~ 03 ~ ~ ~ ::g.i~ ~ 0 j
ill w!m ro Q) moo ill m ill OIUJ
.-+ _-,-+....."'0.-+ .-+-1..-+..-+..-+..-+ 3 _
ro ro CD - CD CD ([) ro CD ro ro, CD "'0 J>>
o 0 0 0, CD 0 0 0 0 0 0: CD C
ooooo.ooooooarcn
00 00 00 00 00 00 00-00 00 00 0.
CD CD ro ([) CD ro roieD ro m
a. a. q.. a. Ia. 0. a.la. a. a.
~ ~ ~
l\J!....... 0 <.0 co ........ Q) 01 ,J::...w f\.) ....II.
d ot otl~ -6'" ot ot' b!
[ [ [!~ -g [ [ ~
'CT "
.,g._g-roQ),ZZlJ
3 _-'~c:cO
oiiJiiJog33Q.
c......~ooC"C"..
:J m Q) CD _, CD ro
-33rr::J""'t.....
o O'O~"t:I Q.Q.
..... c: 5 d& (3 n> Q)
~ ~..-+ (')"'0"'0
oooQ.CDi"E."E.
CQ__ooo----
_-00000(')(')
;JC.CD..2t~
3 a.2. a. 0' 0.'
00 ~ 6" ~ ~
c: 00: c.' ""'t 00
(J) .. III ctl m
~ ~ @~
<'
'"
a.
-
c:
::>
Q.
'"
.... 0'
CD ,
3,.....
., '"
-. CT
=, m
::> CD
lQ '"
S' 6"
'8 sr
~ ~
Y>
." <fJ '"
~~~
"'''''''
wCoCo
"'....0)
"'-..j~
Uw ~
.... w
~ ~ ~
(QNOW
I
<fJ
'"
~
8;10'0-
;: QI ;- -
~ ~I; ;-
Q. ~ 3'3
J'i f! !
s..c:ga.
Q.) d (It,lt)
, - CD _:J
:J: - I g" () ~ :I:
"TI ~ g:~iii"
..... :3 _ g ...
.... Q CD CD
4 ~;O!.
.... lQ u,' 0 Q.
fI'W Q) :Jilt)
(D CQ~cn:J
:r '" u, =- fil'
~ I'~~~E
I --o-CQ:J(ji'
:J Q)3~CD
o :J Q) 0 Co
- S.:Jo.-
,., ~""<: Q)'O
::::J 0...., -'0.
.... :::J: ('[j CD Q)
-. ::l: CI) _I
< '" ii CD
i <D [~
"'tJ - ;:, 001----
"'0 ~ Q,
"'-)>
(Q ~a
.., 0 '"
III lQ;:,
3 Ol:t
i3 ;:;
'" u,
'tJ ::;;
1!.~
o' :;'-1
m.. Q1
g a-
~ ~
;:,-
0",
~N~
s. t-
lQ
;:,
CD
'"
~
u,
<::
"
~- --
OJ
u,.
---'
N
o
,0
010
01 0
-
, I
i
n
....
'"""
~
o
....,
>:=
., 0
~=
= ;!;.
:==
=~
t;;"~
~
~
;::
~
~
~
~
o
=
'"""
=-
-n
~ ('tl
00=
'"""'"""
;.:i ('tl
'""" .,
=
III
~'Z
('tl 0
"Cl .,
S; ~
'"""~
;.:i ('tl
III '"""
o .,
....,0
\0
W
Q
........
Q
N
HP Laser Jet
3200
(Jl)@
HP LASERJET 3200
i n v e n t
OCT-18-2002 11:57AM
Fax Call Report
Job Date Time Type Identification Duration Pages Result
118 10/18/2002 11:37 :38AM Send 9.7634219511 0:52 I OK
119 10118/2002 11: 38: 35AM Send 9,6516286833 0:48 I OK
120 10118/2002 1I39.28AM Send 9.7637060891 0:00 0 Busy
121 10118/2002 1I:40:52AM Send 9.7637060891 0:00 0 Busy
122 10118/2002 11 :46: 16AM Send 9,7637060891 0:00 0 Busy
124 10118/2002 11 :53: 30AM Send 9.7637060891 0:33 I OK
125 10118/2002 11 : 54: 09AM Send 9 6516333846 0:56 I OK
126 10118/2002 11: 55: lOAM Send 96512282191 0:55 I OK
127 10118/2002 1I:56:IOAM Send 9.6512279371 0:34 1 OK
128 10118/2002 1156 49AM Send 96514821262 0:39 1 OK
.