HomeMy WebLinkAboutCCP 12-16-2002
Mayer
Demd8 Probst
eo--n Memberi
Beverly AplikDwskl
DavId Gnuat
GreggLalwa
LoIs ....
t
~HlLLs
AnteD. BiDs City Council
WORK SESSION
4:45 p.m.
Monda December 16. 2002
Agenda
(The times may vary lkpending upon length of discussion.)
iUS W.lllpwa)'''
AnIea BJlk,l'tIhr-'NI9ta
. 5511%
651.634.sne
1. CaD to Order
DEPARTMENT
2. COMMVNITY SERVICES
A. Plannillg Commission Interviews (5)
B. RamSey County Park Master Plan
Amendment -
3. OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE Thomas Moore
STAFF
Aaron Pllttisb.. .
4. ADMINISTRATION Joe Lynch
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS .
A. Council Melnber Grant
B. Council Member Larson
C. Council Meln~ Aplikowski
D. Council Member Rem
E. MayorProbst
..',
File Copy
TIME
4:45
tit
tit
.
~
~HILLS
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
2.A
December 10, 2002
Agenda Item
TO:
Mayor and City Council
Dave Sand, Planning Commission Chair
Joe Lynch, City Administrator
FROM:
If
Aaron Parrish, Community Services Director
SUBJECT: Planning Commission Interviews and Appointments
With the exceptio!1 of Terri Duchenes, all of the current Planning CoII1Il1iss!oners have indicated
atI interest in being reappointed to the Commission for 2003. Assuri:ting all of the current
Commissioners are reappointed, that leaves two vacancies on the Planning Commission. After
soliciting applic~ts, we have received the following applicants .
1. Liz Modesette:
2. Warren Paknlski:
3. Linda Swanson:
4. Clay Larson:
5. Rolf Oliver:
4:45 pm
5:00 pm
5:15 pm
5:30 pm
5:45pm
Applications submitted by the residents above have been included for your review. A list of
questions and a ranking sheet have been included as well. Each of the above residents has been
given a fifteen minute time slot beginning at 4:45. Similar to what has been done in the past,
Planning Commission Chair Dave Sand has been invited and agreed to participate in the
interview process.
Finally, a resolution appointing the two Commissioners has also been inCludedJor the Council's
benefit. If the C04Jlcil is so inclined, they could consider adoption of the attached resolution and
simply insert names. From staffs perspective, it would be beneficial to have the
Commissioner's appointed for the first meeting of the month so the new Commissioners have
time to digest the 'zoning ordinance and related documents. In addition, the January meeting
would be a good first meeting since the agenda appears to be fairly light at this point.
Requested Action
1. Interview Planning Commission Applicants (Work Session)
2. Consider adoption of Resolution 02-69 Appointing Planning Commission Members
(Regular Meeting)
tit
.
.
Plannina Commission Applicant Evaluation Tool
Applicant Ranking
Liz Modessette
Warren Pakulski
Linda Swanson
Clav Larson
Rolf Oliver
Ranking: 1 = Most Qualified
5 = Least Qualified
't
Planning Commissioner Interview Questions:
Rolf Oliver
.
1. Why are you interested in serving on the planning
cOmmission?
2. Please describe any experience you have with planning-
related issues.
3. What eltperience do you have with "'group decision-making"?
.'"
{-:.
.
4. What do you see as the most important job of the Planning
Commission?
5. 'n making decisions, how do you balance the interests of the
city as a whOle; and all of its residents, with the interests of
the applicants?
6. Do you have any questions for us?
.
.
,
5: y5 p. rY\.
~
.
.
.
~
~HILLS
City Committee Application Form
Date 12/06/02
General Information
Name
Oliver
Last
3505 Siems Court
Arden Hills, MN, 55112
Home 651-633-8624
Fax
Rolf
First
L.
M.l.
Address
City, State, ZIP
Phone Number
Work 651-631-8090
Fax 651-631-8251
Email Address
roliver\aioliverarchitects.com
Committees
If you wish to be considered for more than one con please order in number of preference.
Communications
Parks, Trails, & Recreation (PTRC)
City Events Task Force
City Council
Operations & Finance
~ Planning Commission
Website Task Force
Special Interests
As the Council prioritizes its goals, it may create additional/new committees or task forces from time to time. If you
have other specific areas or topics of interest please indicate those interests and we will retain your application for
future openings in those areas as new committees are created.
Other Interests
Parks, Trails, and Recreation (PTRC)
Personal Information
List your work experience.
President Oliver & Associates. Inc.
25 Years as a registered architect specializing in healthcare planning and design. This has
lead to numerous master planning proiects.
Recent experience (2002) completion of the Mayo Master Plan for the Phoenix Campus.
220 acres, 6 million square feet.
City Committee Application Form
Page 1 of2
List any Civic, Professional, and Community Activity involvement.
President and Co-founder of the Mounds View Basketball Association
(bovs and girls) 1983-1989
Why do you want to be on a committee?
Serve the community with land-use planning policy decisions that will enhance the community
for future generations.
What skills, strengths, or abilities do you believe you will add to the committee?
Leadership, planning. organizational. people. and communication skills.
List any additional comments.
As a 20 year resident of Arden Hills, I feel I can contribute to the planning of the community's
future.
References.
1. Bryan McSweenev. Chair Facilities Services
Name
Mavo Clinic Scottsdale -13400 East Shea Blvd. Scottsdale. AZ 85259 480-451-1763 (Client 20 vears)
Address Phone No.
2.
Fred Merrill. Principal
Name
Sasaki Associates Inc. - 64 Pleasant Street:. Watertown. MA 02472
Address
3. David and Katherine Welchel
Name
10608 Direct River Drive, Coon RaDids. MN 55433
Address
Please return this form along with your current resume to:
Altn: City Administrator
City of Arden Hills
1245 West Highway 96
Arden Hills, MN 55112
Phone: (651) 634-5130
Fax: (651) 634-5137
City Committee Application Form
617-923-7327 (Peer 20 years)
Phone No.
763-421-3875 (Personal 20 years)
Phone No.
Page 2 of2
.
.
.
tit
.
.
"
.
RESUME
Rolf Oliver, AlA
Oliver & Associates, Inc.
Project Role
Principal
Education
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA - Master of Architecture in Advanced Studies
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA - Mater of City Planning
University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN - Bachelor of Architecture
Carleton College, Northfield, MN - Bachelor of Arts
Registration
Registered Architect in State of Minnesota
Design Awards
Mayo Medical Center, The Charlton Building - Rochester, MN
1990 Award, Committee on Architecture for Health, AIA
1990 Award, Modern Health Magazine
Professional Summary
Rolfhas over 25 years of health care, clinical and research laboratory architectural experience. As a
principal with national and regional architectural and engineering firms, he has worked on healthcare
projects throughout the country before establishing his own practice over seven years ago. With a
thorough knowledge of healthcare architecture, he is an effective communicator with client and consultant
team members.
The firm holds service contracts with the Mayo Foundation, the University of Minnesota, and the
Hennepin County Medical Center.
Relevant Experience
. Mayo Clinic, Phoenix/Scottsdale, AZ - Mayo Master Plan 2000
. Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN - Downtown Rochester Master Plan 1985
Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN - Multiple projects
Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN - Hilton Guggenheim Laboratory remodeling
. Mayo Foundation, Jacksonville, FL - Multiple projects
. MCF-Stillwater, Bayport, MN - Health Service Relocation
. La Clinica En Concord, West Side Community Health Services, St. Paul, MN
. Allina Health System, Minneapolis, MN - Multiple projects
. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN - Multiple projects
. University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN - Multiple projects
Fairview Hospital and Health Care Services - Minneapolis, MN
Franciscan Skemp Health Care, La Crosse, WI - Multiple projects
. Northfield Hospital, Northfield, MN - Addition/remodeling
. St. John's Hospital, Fargo, ND - Addition/remodeling
North Shore Surgery Center, Milwaukee, WI
Faculty Practice Clinic, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
. Diagnostic Clinic, Largo, FL
Med Center One, Bismark, ND - Addition/remodeling
. Quain & Ramstad Clinic, Bismark, ND
Mary Imogene Bassett Hospital & Clinic, Cooperstown, NY
. Metropolitan-Mount Sinai Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN - Additions/remodeling
Cem Drive\MarlcetioglOAI ResumeslJ-o.12-6-02_doc
Planning Commissioner Interview Questions:
Clay Larson
.
1. Why ar~ you interested in serving on the planning
commission?
2. Please describe any experience you have with planning-
related issues.
3. What experience do you have with '.group decision-making"?
'l!"
"
.
,',
4. What do you see as th'e most important job of the Planning
Commission?
,.~ .
....~
5. In making decisions, how do you balance the interests of the
city asa whole, and all of its residents, with the interests of
the app~icants?
6. Do you have any questions for us?
.
tit
tit
.
vvn
~
~LS
:] 2c,r~
City Committee Application Form
Date !I.Zz..~
General Information
Name
L4~~ U,4V7f!JN A
Last I First M.l.
M~~~~1 t1~ D~2-'1I~67/~
Home&,S-I.I,Zg . ~'R(? Work7l7~. 7~7. h'/?.5
F~ F~
/AL.~(!!.._t!,i. Coolll~ RAPIDS. llII,v . t..t~
Address
City, State, ZIP
Phone Numbers
Email Address
Committees
If you wish to be considered for more than one committee, please order in number of preference.
Communications
Parks, Trails, & Recreation (pTRC)
City Events Task Force
Operations & Finance
--A- Planning Commission
Website Task Force
SDecial Interests
As the Council prioritizes its goals, it may create additional/new conunittees or task forces from time to time. If you
have other specific areas or topics of interest please indicate those interests and we will retain yow application for
future openings in those areas as new committees are created.
Other Interests Ie-AIr P
D~t/ 'h){:> JI1I!N/-
- I
Persona) Information
List YOl!r }Vork experience. I 0..1 -
(I..HIU ~U.It...DI.N" orrtC/AJ - ~ ~,-1/D5 - 'ye.5
I , , I , I 5~r..~1<) t"~-I"IN. { t! #
S IJ:J BIJ A~ /"1-1 J -r ~ I' -k: ~ "5 f Po. << ( z.. t /f?..5
~, (Ol"v<- -nl.A,Df[~ MAIl r-~J Al.:s- /~(,e..s
City Conunittee Application Form
Page 1 of2
List any Civic, Professional, and Community Activity involvemeut.
;;;[ ~f;;,.,~o ( ~n~1 )//16 ~~ I 11J?5A /
.
Why do you want to be on a committee?
List any additional comments,
,- ."
RN~
1. lC"~ -
Name S . Address
2.S::;A r) t. ff u... Ml. -
Name Address
P~""^,IN~ ~~IS1.'
~ Phone No.
(DM" to OFF, (' It\-L
Phone No.
.
3.
Name
Address
Phone No.
Please return this form along with your current resume to:
.'
. '.
Attn: City Administrator
City of Arden Hills
1245 West Highway 96
Arden Hills, MN 55112
Phone: (651) 634-5130
Fax: (651) 634-5137
City Committee Application F onn
Page 2 on
.
.
'.
.
Clayton Larson
','
larson@ci.coon-rapids.mn.us
Work
City of Coon Rapids
11155 Robinson Drive
Coon Rapids, MN 55433
763.767.6475
Employment
CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL
Coon Rapids Inspection Division
Home
1173 Karth Lake Drive
Arden Hills MN 55112
651.628.4980
YEARS EMPLOYED - 1997 - PRESENT
City of Coon Rapids, Minnesota
Responsible for constUlction code compliance for all new and remodeled structures. $1 OOrmn +
valuation per year. Supervise building, plumbing and mechanical inspection, plan review, housing
inspection, and building maintenance code staff.
Construction manager for municipal construction projects.
Building Code Official - 18 years
Construction Project Manager - 4 years
Construction Trades - 8 years
Education
"
ENGLISH MAJOR, GEOLOGV & GEOGRAPHY MINORS
Gustavus Adolphus College
BUILDING INSPECTION TECHNOLOGY
Inver Hills Comm College
Plans Review, Feb 2000; Code Management, March 2003
National Fire Academy
Professional Responsibilities
. Building Official Representitive
}./inn State Fire ChIefs Association - Code Committee
. Member, Committe on Certification
American Insititute of Steel Construction (AISC)
YEARS ATTENDED 1967 - 1971
St.Peter, Minnesota
YEARS ATTENDED 1981-1988
St. Paul. Minnesota
Emmitsburg. Maryland
. Chair, Sub-Committee for Fire Safety
International Building Code. Code Development Committee for Minnesota
. Building Official Representitive,
1306 Commillee (optional fire suppression requirements) State of Minnesota
. Past President
Lake Country Chapter - International Conference of Building Officials
References furnished upon request
Planning Commissioner Intel"View Questions:
Liz Modessette
.
1. Why are you interested in serving on the planning
commission?
2. Please describe any experience you have with planning-
related issues.
, ~,
3, What experience do you have with ""group decision-making.'?
~
.
4. What do you see as the most important job of the Planning
Commission?
;.J
5. In making decisions, how do you balance the interests of the
city as a whole, and all of its residents, with the interests of
the appjicants?
6. Do you "have any questions for us?
.
12/05/02 THU 16:15 F~l
.,.
FAX L4000
Ii!I 002
------ f1~I-i~~-
.
.
.
~
~ILLS
City Committee Application Form
Date '1;T;JP.L--;J2Z-
General Information
Name
A.
MJ.
Address
City, State, ZIP
Phone Numbers
Mr)(j(!.!;.p,~) [.1:""L4-~
Last First
~37'i2. N-e"j l),..t~ "Rc-l
ArJ~ /:J-;Ih. )1 ss/t7
Home {pSI- (0 ], /- 'SO rn 7 Work 7h 3 -,'-\/'1- '/770
Fax Fax 7&3 -.<;)<1- "",/,,07
maJ-esp4.e !>l(~ nv~), .Cffiv\ qru ;. ".(h, . t' ~ ~ {,,::,-J~/,.; <c, -S~O
,J;j '. (PS-/ - (p 33--:5&73
Email Address
Committees
If you wish to be considered for more than one committee, please order in number of preference.
Communications
Parks, Trails, & Recreation (PTRC)
City Events Task Force
Operations & Finance
-X- Planning Commission
Web site Task Force
Snecial Interests
As the Council prioritizes its goals, it may create additionaVnew committees or task forces from time to time. If you
have other specific areas or topics of interest please indicate those interests and we win retain yom application for
futme openings in those areas as new conunittees ale created.
Other Interests --JCA If? /7);(Lj s / '5/gx~,L... /0 J1u../
. / / I
Personal Information
List yonr work experience.
ff~'1------n4,-,~ (frq-ov't ('1n<I\.}rvc.Jr ITh"-- -7:-rI/wf /tfrLA"_</,/J "hdd
~ ;., ^ S'(~'~ v ~
)'1 1- I .... . . ;"J,' - . fU ,'It (('. .)yo/d~
I~I~- l' \;-. ~~v~:!::::S:/:1~r7'EP C~~
City Committee Application F onn
Page 1 Qf2
12/05/02 TIIU 16: 16 FAX
, '
FAX L4000
G!I 003
i UY~M"r:;""~ Uimm"'~ A.i"~ ""I'~ .
H~;>t$;r~~'f{;;," ;J!:;1(0UR~
Wby do you want to be on a committee?
-;j'r;:.t~~-h~~ ~'f~:;:;:~:~Jy~~j-rJ
J'JroJ.L./ fUYfoSe.......
Wbat skills, strengtbs, or abilities do you believe you will add to tbe committee?
~bk-,.,. "",lvl"-l -1[,74 Ye.f'-'~<I1A- ,h,V IA1IIY!:..""-}7::) GLLO:Jj.sJII'}..J
~ir~W~~~J~~ 7J~~::::~~.
List any additional comments.
References. . .
l.Ja..... ""'&-}h<~ J1-L,'gUo v) /fw,. ?f::l-(P3f;-eJ'7<Jt1 1tJ11"Z- '8f33- 72- cj 7
~ / Mdress Phone No.
2 ~:i2/y.5f,,"f.rL..-~ (#t1t 111/7..-723 - ~lJflB
N ' A &.0' Phone No.
3 J~.l'\- ,),0 ~ ) J11.d!rotJ;f;. dr <./(.il..tn-. kJ..t. /r"c:;J- /0 "3 t/ - n. 3 z..--
Name Address Phone No.
Please return this form along with your currenl resume to:
Attn: City Administraror
City of Arden Hills
1245 West Highway 96
ArdenHills,MN 55112
Phone: (651) 634-5130
Fax: (651) 634-5137
City Commitle~ Application Form
Page 2 of2
.
12/05/02 THU 16:16 FAX
,
FAX L4000
Ii!I 004
.
as McGough
Five Generations Building Confidence
ELIZABETH MODE8ETTE
Project Manager
Elizabeth has 21 years of experience in the construction industry. Her professional background uniquely
qualifies her for a project such as yours. As project manager, Elizaheth will work directly with the
Owners and design team in formulating the project budget and developing a project strategy,
Elizabeth will be responsible for the daily administration of the project. She will coordinate work
associated with cost estimating and bidding throughout the preconstruction and construction phases and
will interface closely with the design team and contractors to ensure that established project guidelines
are achieved.
Education
University of Minnesota Institute of Technology in geotechnical engineering
The College of 81. Catherine in chemistry
.
Experience
McGough Construction Co., Inc.
Twin City Testing Corp" Inc.
Positions Held
Project Manager
Site Coordinator
Field Engineer
1989 - Present
1981-1989
Quality Control
Carpenter
Estimator
Representative
Project Experience
US West Communications
St. Paul, Minnesota
u.s. Satellite Broadcasting Co" Inc.
Oakdale, Minnesota
Medtronic, Inc,
Fridley, Minnesota
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota
Brooklyn Park:, Minnesota
Columbia Heights, Minnesota
Mounds View, Minnesota
Shoreview, Minnesota, Minnesota
Spring Lake Park:, Minnesota
St. Paul Companies
St, Paul, Minnesota
Cray Research, Inc.
Eagan, Minnesota
Blue Cross & Blue Shield ofMinn,
Eagan, Minnesota
HealthEast St, Joseph's Hospital
St. Paul, Minnesota
John G. Kinnard
Minneapolis, Minnesota
.
Z737FAlRVlEW AVENUE NORTII I ST.PAULMINNESOTA5SI13-I372Z
Plannin~ Commissioner Interview Questions:
Warren Pakulski
.
1. Why are you interested in serving on the planning
commission?
2. Please describe any exp'erience you have with planning-
related. iSsues.
3. What experience do you have with ""group decision~making"?
c~
.
4, What do you see a's the most important job of the Planning
CommiSsion?
5, In making decisions, how do you balance the interests of the
city asa Whole, and all of its reSidents, with the interests of
the applicants?
6. Do you have any questions for us?
.
1~(89(2882 89:43
6516389331
WARREN W PAKULSKI
PAGE 82
Page 3/4
12/5/2002
15015
.
U10
~
'^~ HILLS
CITY APPLICATION FORM
ADVISORY COMMITTEE. COMMISSION. TASKFORCE
DATE,i~. tJ'. 0)" How did you rcamof"caocy'/ ,AdM'r- p~.
NAME: WIW-f<.r:;N 0. PA~lALS I<:..L........
ADDRESS: . '!.!;;."L~~_([~_/JIt. ---.f}~_IIiI&I1t AI s.-:r-/ /2-
PHONE (p ,,,/. '3.7.l{~~._.(1I).~s.:1, ..~3X:.._'l3 ~J:__ (W)
&5_1- II>::3P. 133/ (fAX) Pd 1:/(15*/ J~(E-M.it)
I +-Ih'
ADVlSORY COMMITTEES: A f . a,.O 1>1
(If you wish to be considered for more tho.n o.t\t: ~ommittce. plol1:Kl ordot" in :numbol' of
preference.)
.
ComDlulli..tifl", Committee
Op...t.;on. & Finance
Com",i"""
Park.., Trails & ae......tin"
CUDlDlittee
__C?
PIIDDlog CODUl\b,l~n
SPECIFIC INTERESTS:
(As the Council prioritizes ite goalA, it may create additionaVnew COmmittCCll or taSlk .rorcei
from time 10 tim<:. If)"Ju"", interc..tcd ;n any oflhc fullowiDIl odf)"Juharc any other
'pecific arc., or topics of iDle,..st, we will rctah')"Jur applic.tinn fur future opening, in tho.e
l\feilB P5 .new cormnittc.cs arc created.)
_ City Event. T..k Foree
_ MRintenance F~t.mty T:t~k Fnrr.e
_ Weboile TASk force
_ Other lntcrcst,,___.
(continued)
WORK EXI'ERIENCE:
_..l!jg:_ Pre'?!.deJ\.1_&.Smes (
(] L . It. . Af~
el/f:;".o-f.fli~__ ~
.
1~/89/2882 89:43
5515389331
WARREN W PAKUL5KI
PAGE 83
P"''1c 4/-1
12{5{2002 lS:lS
.
eMC. PROFESSIONAL & COMMUNITY ACTlVl.TlliS:
-fuvy~~_~~__=_~t){)j__
WHY DO YOU WANT TO BE ON AN ADVISORY COMMITTEE:
_. ~ .-<-~ /wA '~~<1J(2 'to _ .
-~~. 4ffY?IJ.~~-4/A~_-fI!:I~.
. ~H4 ~ 7'?i..:- .
WHA T 5~SI STRENGTHS OR ABILITIES DO YO BELIEVE YOU WILL ADO
TO THE COMMITTEE:
I!/u~, ~JAAh:LL...itt:lL ?~~~4./N
~~,--I/d&~ st~___u. __/'/1/{/
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
.
REFERENCES (OptiQul)
N.""
Address
Phone
I'lea.e retum this limn, with resume, to:
City HIli/Au", City Admini.tnlor
City of Anlen Hms
1245 We.. HigbWllY 96
Al'dell Hill., MN 55112-5794
Tc1cl)hone: (651) 634-5120 - Fax: (65))634-5137
M:\USElRS'6HBIL^,^OMIN\COMMITIIi\J\PPLJCAt.WPO
.
.
.
.
Planning Commissioner Interview Questions:
Linda SwansolJ
1. Why are you interested in serving on the planning
commission?
2. Please describe any experience you have with planning-
related issues.
3. What experience do you have with ""group decision-making.'?
".~
4, What dCJ you see as the most important job ofthe Planning
Commission?
5, In making decisions, how do you balance the interests of the
city as a whole, and all of its residents, with the interests of
the applicants?
6. Do you have any questions for us?
Dle 5.2002 8 05AM
NO. 2100
P. 2
lfn
1 ,
. '-~~-_._-----
~
~HILLS
.
City Committee Application Form
Dale 1'.;,( /~~ 1e.2.
. .
General Information
5w/-liJ ~c;''YV
Last
liNin
t11
M.I
Name
Email Address
First
/food
5S 1/2-
Work
Fax Fax
/<//Jd"-??,~ ..J 6J //fr:)4~S-dX...C?iJe, ~
Address
City, Slate, ZIP
Phone Numbers
Committees
If you wish 10 be; COD3idcn:d for mOTC than one committee) p1c-asc order in numb~r or preference.
Communications
Parks, Trails, & Recreation (PTRC)
City Events Task Force
::x
Operations & Finance
Planning Commission
Website Task Force
.
Special Interests
As Ihe Council prioritizes its goals, it may c.eate additionaL/new committees or Ill!!'k. flHees from time to time. If you
bave: olhel specific areas or lopics of interc:st pleue iodicat~ tho~e lnlcrcslJ and Wt will retain yO'W' a.pplication for
future openings in those BreIS: &!i new committees ue created.
Other Interests
Personal Information
List your work experienee.
l.e9a1 r 13t.M ;'7n,
/l/Jayl JVJ '
I
L1<<SI/1I'SS &/7.0///41',171
Cil)' Commitlce Application Fonn
Page 1 oi2
.
,
~--
.
.
.
DEC. 5 2002 8: 05AM
NO. 2100 P. 3
List any Civie, Professional, and Community Activity involvemeot.
t!/JCU1 pt,eS'(fX./ 1) d &Jy ~dMIed' ms;C- MfP/
~~:-";;ff~J4#dP
~t% . v~~=~ . . a?6~
~tfl/~~~~~dt ~~C::~1:;g ~/~
f~ What skill$, streDcths, or abilities do you believe you will add to tbe committee?
~~:J:k~~~~~~-~~a;:;;=~/~
~~~. ,t;~ ~r~ .MI, .#,e~ #',&h.
List any additional comments.
Refereoces.
I.AO/.5 '*~
N.me
2. rl!!1C' (1-t'(//7t!
3.6~ ~L-;fCk;.0
Name
6~(ldt'P7Jd /o/t'hlh
Addte.. Phone No.
~ ~.:U??U/ h7U~k,
c!:..d'''' ~. Phone No.
~ >:m&/ ~'r&::""
Ad e(;s Pbonc No.
Please return this form along with your current resume to:
Attn: City Administraror
City of Arden Hills
1245 West Highway 96
Arden Hills, MN 55112
Phone: (651) 634-5130
Fax: (651) 634-5137
City Corrunince Applic.iI!ion form
Page 2 of2
\:
.
.
.
~
~HILLS
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
Agenda Item Worksession: 2.B
December 12, 2002
Regular:
6.A
TO:
Mayor Dennis Probst
Council Member Beverly Aplikowski
Council Member David Grant
Council Member Gregg Larson
Council Member Lois Rem
Joe Lynch, City Administrator
FROM:
;I
Aaron Parrish - Cormnunity Services Director
SUBJECT:
Rice Creek North Regional Trail Master Plan
ENCLOSURES:
1. November 14, 2002 Memo to Council
2. November 26, 2002 PTRC Meeting Minute Excerpt
3. December 4, 2002 Planning Commissiou Meetiug Excerpt
4. December 10, 2002 Letter from Kathleen Wallace, DNR Regional
Director
5. Resolntion #02-73 Approving the Rice Creek North Regional
Trail Master Plan Amendment
6. Draft Agreement between the City of Arden Hills and Ramsey
County
Overview '
Ramsey Countyis requesting that the City evaluate a proposed park master plan amendment to
the Rice Creek North Regional Trail Master Plan. In particular, it is necessary for the City to
make a finding that the proposed park plan amendment is consistent with the Arden Hills
Comprehensive Plan.
Update
Since the previous Council discussion on this item, the following has occurred:
Parks, Trails, and Recreation Committee and Planning Commission Review
Pursuant to Council direction, staff has presented the amendment to the PTRC and Planning
Commission. Both are recommending approval of the proposed amendment. Meeting minutes
for both meetings have been included for your reference.
I'
Page 2
December 12, 2002
.
Staff Interactio1l with Ramsey County
Subsequent to the previous Council Worksession, staff has been working with Rainsey County
on addressing the City's concerns with the proposed amendment. The following were the
primary concerns with the proposed amendment:
1. Access to the primer tracer area: If the City were to acquire this area, there needs to be
some way to access this parcel. To address this issue, the County has agreed work with
the City to acquire access from County Road I via the National Guard properly. If this
cannot be accomplished, access would be provided via through the "wildlife corridor."
2. A North/South Transportation Connection: In preliminary discussions with MNDOT
and Ramsey County, it was indicated that a north/south connection through TCAAP
would be desirable to accommodate any additional traffic generated as a result of reuse
on the TCAAP property. Further, these agencies felt that an additional north/south
cOllllection would act as a reliever for the existing arterial and highway systems.
Realistically, there are two options to facilitate a north/south connection through the site.
First, the road could go thtough the "wildlife corridor" area up to County Road I. Aside
from working with Ramsey County, the City would also have obtain pennission from the .
National Guard to go through their license area.
Second, the transportation connection could cross Rice Creek at the County Road H ramp
and proceed along I-35W to north. Based on preliminary discussions, MNDOT and
Ramsey County Public Works has indicated that this is the preferable transportation
option. Further, Ramsey County Parks has agreed to work with the City to cross Rice
Creek in this area. This is the preferred option of the DNR and Ramsey County Parks.
From staffs perspective, we have reached a mutually beneficial agreement for both the County
and the City. To formalize the understanding between the City and the County, the City
Attorney has prepared an agreement outlining the roles and obligations of both the City and the
County. Staff has reviewed and met with the County and incorporated their suggested changes.
The current agreement is attached for your review.
At this point, staff would recommend approval of the attached resolution approving the Rice
Creek North Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment. Since the Council has not seen the
proposed agreement at a previous meeting, the approval is contingent on the execution of an
agreement between the City and County. Any feedback the Council might have on the current
draft of the agreement would be appreciated.
Requested Action
1. Consider adoption of resolution #02-73 approving the Rice Creek North Regional Trail .
Master Plan Amendment.
2. Provide input on the agreement between the City of Arden Hills and Ramsey County.
.
.
.
~
~~LLS
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
2.B
November 14, 2002
Agenda Item
TO:
Mayor Dennis Probst
Council Member Beverly Aplikowski
Council Member David Grant
Council Member Gregg Larson
Council Member Lois Rem
Joe Lynch, City Administrator
Aaron Parrish - Community Services Director /I (l
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Rice Creek Corridor Master Park Plan Amendment
ENCLOSURES:
1. Arden Hills Future Land Use Map (Comprehensive Plan)
2. Vento Reuse Plan Map: Potential Excess Area
3. Arden Hills Transportation Map (Comprehensive Plan)
4. 11-13-02 E-mail from Greg Mack
5. Proposed Amendment to the Rice Creek North Regional Trail
Master Plan.
Overview
Ramsey County is requesting that the City evaluate a proposed park master plan amendment to
the Rice Creek North Regional Trail Master Plan. In particular, it is necessary for the City to
make a finding that the proposed park plan amendment is consistent with the Arden Hills
Comprehensive Plan.
Analvsis
Since the amendment was only received Wednesday November 13th, 2002, a complete analysis
of the proposed amendment cannot be provided. However, staff would make the following
comments:
1. Land Use: The Future Land Use Plan identifies this area Park Preserve. This land use
category includes nalural and scenic areas that are to be preserved for public use. This is
consistent with the proposed amendment.
2. Parks and Trails: The recently adopted Parks, Trails, and Open Space Plan calls for a
slightly different configuration for the trail. This appears to be a resolvable issue:
Page 2
November 14, 2002
.
3. Transportation: The Comprehensive Plan indicates the following relative to
transportation on the TCAAP property:
The TCAAP area will have a Minor Arterial road that will run through the entire
developable area. It will be constructed as development occurs. The City will
initiate discussions with Ramsey County on whether this road should be part of
the County system, and if so, what the design standards should be. Connections
to Highway 96, Highway 10. and I-35W via County Road H will be a part of the
Minor Arterial system. Collector and local streets will be constructed with
development as appropriate for the associated land uses. The planned amount of
development in TCAAP is decreased in the updated land use plan from the 1981
plan. reducing both local and regional traffic impacts. (Arden Hills
Comprehensive Plan, Page 79)
This is outlined on the attached transportation map taken from the Comprehensive Plan.
Ramsey County Parks has indicated that they do not want a street through the wildlife
corridor area. As such, this leaves no access to the 66 acre primer tracer area effectively
landlocking this piece of property. The proposed amendment indicates that access from
County Road I would be preferable from Ramsey County Park's perspective. However,
this requires going through property currently under license by the National Guard. At .
this point, they have not indicated that they are willing to make this commitment.
Additionally, we do not have the benefit of detailed traffic and planning analysis to
determine whether the north/south connection contemplated in the Comprehensive Plan is
necessary or not. Minimally, any approval should be conditioned on receiving some type
of access from County Road I to the primer tracer area.
4. Public Safety: Expanding on the transportation and traffic issues above, it would seem
logical that fire protection to the TCAAP site would be provided by the Fire Station on
County Road I. Taking away the north/south connection to the balance of the TCAAP
property would require fire vehicles to drive south on Lexington and then west on
Highway 96, or drive east on County Road I and south on 1-35W. Needless to say,
neithcr are practical solutions.
5. Evaluation: The Council may wish to consider how this particular request is evaluated.
Since it is addressing issues within the Comprehensive Plan, the Council may wish to
have the Planning Commission provide comment and/or a recommendation. Since there
are park issues involved, the Council may wish to solicit feedback from the Parks, Trails,
and Recreation Committee.
Requested Action
Provide comments relativc to the proposed park master plan amendment
.
.
.
~
Arden Hills Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes
November 26, 2002
2
3.
HIGHWAY 96 RECONSTRUCTION / RICE CREEK CORRIDOR MASTER
PLAN AMENDMENT DISCUSSIONS
Mr. Parrish presented the Rice Creek Corridor Master Plan Amendment. He requested
comments from the Committee.
Greg Mack, representative of Ramsey County, answered the Committee's questions regarding
access Issues.
Committee Member Henry stated he agreed with putting the wildlife corridor where it was, but
he objected to a road going through it. He stated it was sensible to run the road north/south along
35W to County Road I.
Council Member Larson stated it was possible for the City to build a crossing that was sensitive
to wildlife, if they needed a north/south connection. He noted the Council did not want to
foreclose on that idea. He stated Council did not know ifthey needed it or not at this time.
Joan Galli, DNR representative, stated the DNR did not want a north/south connection through
the wildlife area. She noted the DNR did not have a good design or any assurances that it was
possible to have a connection that was sensitive to wildlife. She encouraged a connection where
it would not impact the wildlife.
Committee Member Crassweller stated he was against a tunnel or an elevated roadway and
precluding the possibility of a north/south access. He noted he was all for Ramsey County to
have access, but he was sympathetic to the City's argument regarding access across the area
without restriction.
Committee Member Henry pointed out there was plenty of other options to put in a road and
from the standpoint of the Parks, Trails Committee, it made no sense to support a road through
the wildlife area.
Committee Member Crassweller stated he agreed to give up control of the wildlife corridor to
Ramsey County provided the City had some assurance that the potentially landlocked piece of
property had at least the option of some kind of a connection through it at some future time.
Committee Member Thompson stated they needed to look at what the goals were and it was not
a matter of control, but how would the land be used and what were the priorities for that land.
MOTION:
Committee Member Henry motioned, Committee Member Messerly, seconded to
"gleefully" recommend the Rice Creek Corridor Master Plan Amendment.
Committee Member Crassweller requested a friendly amendment on page 2, first
paragraph, last sentence add the following sentence: "However, the City
recognized that it is possible that road access to the Tracer site may require the
City to have access to the south across site C and D. Therefore, our approval of
this amendment is contingent upon the City maintaining with Ramsey County the
Arden Hills Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes 3
November 26, 2002
possibility of an environmentally consistent access through site C and D at some .
time in the future".
Committee Member Henry indicated he would not accept the friendly amendment
and pointed out the PTRC should not support a road through the wildlife corridor.
Amendment failed for lack of a second.
The original motion carried 6-1 (Committee Member Crassweller).
Mr. Parrish summarized the Highway 96 Reconstruction and asked for comments from the
Committee regarding median treatments, street scaping, proposed trail, and landscaping.
Committee Member Crassweller noted ifTCAAP was going to be developed, it made sense to
have a trail on both sides of Highway 96.
Committee Member Henry stated he would prefer natural prairie grass in the medians.
Committee Member Crassweller stated this should not be a concern of the PTRC to decide what
type of plantings to have in the medians. He noted the only concern the PTRC should have is if
they needed the medians, and leave the decision as to what to put in the median up to people who
knew what would grow best in the median.
MOTION:
Committee Member Henry motioned, Committee Member Messerly seconded, to
recommend trails on both sides of Highway 96. The motion carried unanimously.
.
The Committee reached the consensus to not make any recommendation on the plantings in the
medians.
4. COUNCIL UPDATE
Council Liaison Larson provided the Committee with an overview of the following City Council
items:
.:. The Council had taken action on the Guidant proposed site plan and the amendment to
the plan. He noted Guidant was replatting the property to allow for long-term expansion
oftheir campus and in return they worked with the neighbors regarding the neighborhood
concerns.
.:. He stated Council approved a Special Use Permit for a Drive-in Bank off of County Road
E.
.:. He noted Council accepted a feasibility plan for a pavement improvement project in the
Ingerson neighborhood.
~
,
.
-
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - DECEMBER 4, 2002
8
Chair Sand noted they needed to make sure they had room for a City monument sign at
Lexington A venue and Highway 96 and he reminded the Council that the sign should be
placed in the budget.
Mr. Parrish noted if they chose to irrigate the median, there would be a cost factor
because the City had to pay for the water. He also noted it would be a maintenance factor
for the City's Operations and Maintenance staff, which would also be a cost factor to the
City.
Commissioner Zimmerman stated whatever landscaping was incorporated, it needed to
be maintained.
Commissioner Zimmerman asked if it was possible to use the proposed ponding area at
the maintenance facility for irrigation. Mr. Parrish replied he did not think that would be
an option.
Chair Sand asked if there would be improved lighting. Mr. Parrish noted the lighting
would substantially remain the same and if the City wanted improved lighting, it would
be at City's expense.
C.
RICE CREEK CORRIDOR PARK PLAN AMENDMENT
Mr. Parrish stated Ramsey County was requesting that the City evaluate a proposed park
master plan amendment to the Rice Creek North Regional Trail Master Plan, Mr. Parrish
presented the plan and asked for the Commissioners' comments,
Commissioner Zimmerman stated he did not want to see them making decisions on this
property on an instance-by-instance basis. He indicated he wanted to look at the whole
area. He stated they needed to understand what was going to be done on the overall
scheme. He noted he believed most people wanted as much natural area as possible in
this area. He stated they needed to be sensitive to areas that were desirable and
aesthetically pleasing to the area,
Chair Sand asked if Hamline Avenue would be a major access as originally proposed.
Mr. Parrish replied Hamline Avenue was not proposed to be a major access to TCAAP
because of the joint maintenance facility and the property being owned by the National
Guard.
Chair Sand noted this would change the City's proposed gateway entry. He stated they
needed to look at the possibility of having Snelling Avenue as the gateway entrance and
indicated they needed to anticipate landscaping, etc. of that gateway area at this time.
Mr. Parrish noted they did not know were the TCAAP entrances would be at this time, so
it would be hard to plan ahead now.
Chair Sand noted there were only three options, and they needed to look at the
landscaping and signage options at all of these locations.
Chair Sand asked if it was the Primer Tracer area that was where they proposed a sports
center. Mr. Parrish replied a large portion of that area was identified as a joint athletic
facility and this would require some additional analysis as to whether this was a good
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - DECEMBER 4, 2002
9
area for such a facility. He noted the Primer Tracer area needed further environmental ~
studies. .
Commissioner Ricke noted if the road were approved to go through where the County
was recommending it, would one access to the Primer Tracer area be adequate if there
was a sports center there. Mr. Parrish replied he believed one access would be adequate.
Chair Sand stated his concern was that this development would develop piece-meal. He
noted they needed to look at the whole site and not just small parcels of it. He asked they
keep the whole plan in mind. He also expressed concern about only one access in the
Primer Tracer area if there was a sports center located there.
Mr. Parrish noted many of the decisions they were being asked to make at this time was
because of the Federal Government's requirements and the City was being asked to make
decisions quickly without all of the information. He noted one of the keystone elements
would be the negotiation and execution of a Memorandum Of Understanding between the
County and City solidifying the conceptual elements being made at this time.
Commissioner Ricke also expressed concern about doing this development piece-meal
and not looking at the area as a whole.
Commissioner Ricke asked where the proposed post office would be located. Mr. Parrish
noted the Postal Service had not indicated what parcel they were interested in, but if they .
were interested in a parcel, it would be in the officer's quarter area, which would mean
the City could not put a road through that area. The road would then need to go through
the Primer Tracer area, which would affect the wildlife corridor area. He noted the
Federal Government had encouraged the Postal Service work with the other parties
involved to fmd the best area for a post office.
Chair Sand requested staff not forget the past and forego the Vento Plan. He noted a lot
of hard work had gone into the Vento Plan.
Greg Mack, Ramsey County, stated they had been working with City staff and they were
looking at this as ajoint effort. He indicated they clearly understood the principles of the
Vento Plan. He stated they would like to see the western connection because that would
be the most effective route. He noted they would work with the National Guard to see if
there would be a logical extension of the north road to the Primer Tracer area. He
indicated they would also like trail access to the National Guard wildlife area. He noted
they were not trying to land grab, they were attempting to work with the City. He stated
they had no control over where a post office would be located and at this time, the Postal
Service had not expressed any specific interest in the officer's quarter's property.
Commissioner Zimmerman noted this was the best overall solution to this.
Commissioner Zimmerman moved, seconded by Chair Sand, to recommend to Council to
accept the Ramsey County's proposed Park Plan Amendment as presented. ~
The motion carried unanimously (4-0-1 )(Commissioner Ricke abstained).
.
.
.
DEC-12-2002 11:21
RAMSEY COUNTY PARKS
651 748 2508 P.02/03
:YliIlIlG'(lta DC~ld1"llllellt O!' ~U[lll'Cd Re'\lllrlL'~
'ill'I.,i'
i{
""1 f' '.1.,,"" ",' .'1
The Honorable Dennis Probst
Arden Hills City Council
1245 West Highway 96
Arden Hills. MN. 55112
December 10.2002
re: The 49 acre wildlife corridor and the amendment to the Rice Creek North Regional Trail
Master Plan
Dear Mayor Probst and City Council members,
As you know, The Department of Natural Resources supports the amendment proposed by
Ramsey County to include the 49 acre wildlife corridor within [he boundaries of the Rice Creek
North Regional Trail corridor. We are very appreciative of the support this proposal has received
[0 dUle from both the Arden Hills Parks and Trails Committee and the Planning Comminee We
look forward to the City's approval of the proposed amendment.
In the County's Proposed Amendment 10 rhe Rice Creek Norrh Regional Trail MasrN PIWI
currently before the City Council, the 49 acre comdor is presented as two parcels referred 10 as
parcel C and parcel D. Parcel D is intended to depict that portion of the 49 acre, which IS the
Anny's site C contamination site. It hos been brought to our attention that there IS some
confusion sUITounding the reasons for separating the twO parcels.
In the text of the County proposal (see second paragraph on page 2) it says the following."
"The area of contarrhation (Parcel 0) will be remediated by the U.S. Department of the Anny In
accordance with the standards agreed upon by the Arm\-and the Environmental Protection
Agency, Activities are underway to cleanup contaminants on ths sile." Indeed, Ramsey County
and the DNR have been talking with the MN. Pollution Control Agency regarding the best way to
cleun the site in order to assure toat site C (Parcel D) can ultimately serve loe functions of the
wlldJife corridor.
The inlent of the County's two parcels approach is Ihat [he County would receive transler 01
Parcel C (the clean portion) through the National Park Services's Lands to Park, Prog,"m early
In the land transfer process. Meanwhile Parcel D (site C) would be retained by the rcderal
government with the Anny doing the cleanup until finished to Record of Decision ,t.ndai'd,
Once the cleanup is accomplished to meet, at a minimum, Record of Decision critenJ, " "ould
then be transferred directly to the County,
DNR lnlonnation: 651-296.6157 . 1-8B8.646-6367 . TTY: 651.296.5484 . 1.'""',' -"I 2<J
An Equ.1l OpportunilY I?mptoyc-T
Who Villue!i. Dlvenily
o
Prinled on Rac:yc.I"O P3per eOI\131""'0"
Mlnimum at lOti.. Pot,t-ConSuMcf Wl.l~IG
'020EC 12AH10:53
DEC-12-2002 11:22
RAMSEY COUNTY PARKS
651 748 2508 P.03/03
,
Clcarly {hen. it would not falltD the City tD clean site C. The land would end up with the CDUnty
cleaned to a standard suitable for a wildlife and recreatiDn corridDr. thus fulfilling the visiDn of
the VentD Plan for a connection between Rice Creek and the future regional park reserve.
In order that the federal government retain responsibility to complete cleanup of site C. it is
necessary that the 49 acres not be included in the lands designated fro Early Transfer Authonty.
We note in the City's propDsed leller to GSA asking to initiate the Early Transfer Authority that
such Un exemption of the 49 acres has not been considered.
We are seeking your help in obtaining an exemption of the 49 acre wildlife conidor from the
Early Transfer AuthDrity so that the cleanup can be accomplished by the Army to their credn in
the public interest of establishing the wildlife comdor. It would be most effective if such a
request is included by the City of Arden Hills in the" letter to GSA.
Thank you for your consideration of this approach. Please let me knDw how we might continue
to cDoperate to achieve the Vento Plan vision for TCAAP.
Sincerely,
~ ;( CUaLttd-
Kathleen A Wallace
Regional Director
cc: Congresswoman ~etty McCollum
Greg Mack. Ramsey County Parks and Recreation )'~partmenl
TOTAL P.03
.
.
.
.
.
.
~
~~HILLS
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 02-73
AI'I'"ltOVING THE RICE CREEK NORTH REGIONAL TRAIL MASTER PLAN
AMENDMENT
WHEREAS, the Arden Hills City Council approved the Rice Creek North Regional Trail
Corridor Master Plan January 21",1998; and
WHEREAS, Ramsey County has submitted an amendment, attached as Exhibit A, to
incorporate an additional 49 acres into the plan generally referred to as the "wildlife corridor";
and
WHEREAS, City of Arden Hills staff have reviewed the plan; and
WHEREAS, the Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee reviewed the plan at their November
26'h, 2002 meeting and are recommending its approval; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the plan at their December 4th, 2002 meeting
and are recommending its approval.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arden Hills,
Minnesota, that the City of Arden Hills approves the attached amendment to the Rice Creek
North Regional Trail Master Plan; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED; that the City Council of the City of Arden Hills, Minnesota,
approves the acquisition and development of the Ramsey County Rice Creek North Regional
Trail Corridor conditioned on the execution of an agreement between the City and County
addressing issues associated with providing a north/south connection through the Twin Cities
Army Ammunition Plant and access to the 'primer tracer" area from County Road I.
BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED; that the City Council ofthe City of Arden Hills, Minnesota,
has made the determination that the proposed amendment is consistent with the City's
Comprehensive Plan based on the following findings:
I. The proposed park plan amendment is consistent with the future land use designation of
park preserve.
2, The alternate configuratiou of a north/south transportation connection through TCAAP
satisfies the intent of the Comprehensive Plan's Transportation Element.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
THIS 16th DAY OF DECEMBER, 2002.
ATTBST:
DENNIS PROBST, MAYOR
JOSEPH P. LYNCH, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
.
.
.
Exhibit A
.
PROPO$ED AMENDMENT
TO THE RICE CREEK NORTH REGIONAL TRAIL
MASTER PLAN
.
The fi:>llowing atnaridment to the Rice Greek North Regional Trail Master Plan (June
1998) has been prepared and is being proposed by the Ramsey County Parks and
Recrea.tlon Departfl'lE!nl. AcqL!isitlon of the land included in the proposed
afl'lE!m:lm~nt wit! preserve a. corridor which links the Rice Creek corridor with the
1500-aGl'e preserve under the management of the Minnesota National Guard. The
corridor will pre"S6lV6 a. hydrological and wildlife movement functions, as well as
future trail oonnections to the lar~ preserve. The properly is currently part of the
Twin Gitles Army Alfdl1lJnition Plant (TCMP) and an "Excessing Process" has been
initialed 10 dispaseofthe properly.
Afimndmentto.8ection VIII ACQUJ8lTIDN DETAILS
A. Parcellnfomialion
The 1G98'M$ster Plan identified two parcels for acquisition; Parcel A. 113 acres
from TCAJ\P arid Parcel 6.11 acres from MnOOT. (See enclosed Boundary Map).
1. ~~lil~~ntla*~: This amendment proposes that the acql:llsition boundary
rerthe ~iohal tl!a:il'ebftidor be ell(panded to include an additional 49 acres of
TOMP l'toperty. ftl:'e properly has been identified as Parcel C and Parcel D.
ParcelC: US. D$pl. of Defense. 42.75 acres
Parcel D: U.S. Dept. of Defense, 6.25 acres
2. Amendl'nentJu~lfleation: The proposed amendment will enable Ramsey County
to acqliite an impOrtant natUral corridor between the existing boundary of the
regional trail and the la~e natUre preserve managed by the Minnesota National
GUard.
Preservation ofthe'wildlife corridor is consistent with the 1996 'Vision forthe
Future" plan (a,k.a. Vento Reuse Plan) adopted by the TCMP Reutilization
Oommittee appointed by the lata Con9ressman Bruce Vento. The Minnesota
Deparfmentof Natural Resol:lrces (DNR) has identified the wildlife corridor as an
integralecoJoglcallink between Rice Oreek on the west and a future regional park
reserve on the east. In addition to its local ecological significance, the DNR believes
that thewlldlife corridor is a key link to two regionally significant ecological corridors
-lhe Mississippi River and the 51. Oroix River corridors.
The additional area has been identified as two separate parcels. Parcel D has
contamination which must be cleaned up prior to a transfer to Ramsey County. (See
map). Parcel C is free of contamination and could be transferred as soon as the
excessing process is complete.
.
3, Restoration/DeVelopment: The area contains seVeral small buildings, roads and
a railroadspl:lr, The bolldings will be removed Within five years. It is anticipated that
the roads and railroad will be removed in conjunction and cooperation with
development of the p.roperties to the north and south, The city of Arden Hills has
expressed conCern about future road access to the adjacent 66-acre "Primer" .
TraCer" site. To maintain the integrity of the wi.ldlife corridor, road access to this site
should be provided from the north off County Road I and follow the west boundary
of the property licensed to the Minnesota National GUard.
The area of contamination (Parcel D) will be remediated by the U.S. Department of
Army in acoordance with the standards agreed upon by the .Armyand the
Environmental Protection Agency. Activities are underway to cleanupcontaminant$
on the site. In the event that the site is not suitable for publiC access, fencing the
site may be necessary. Fll'ncing should beinstallll'd ina manner that allow!> f(lr
animal mOvement under the fence.
Restoration of the natural drainage corridor and vegetation wfll be acoomplished by
Ramsey County. All restoration actMfies will utilize native plant material and be
coordinated with the Minnesota National Guard to assure consistency throughout
the COrridor.
The only recreational development anticipated will be a future trail connection
between the Rise Creek corridor and lhe Minnesota National Guard property. This
trail connection will be subject to agreements for use of the National Guard property
fortrail uses such as Nordic skiing. The property wlll be svailst>le for inforrmrl, non"
consumptive outdoor recreation activities such as nature study and birding.
Attachments:
.
Attachment A - Boundary Map Illustrating Approved Rice Creek North Regional
Trail Corridor
Attachment B - 2000 All'rlaJ Photo of Wildlife Corridor
Attachment C - Wildlife Corridor, Vegetation
Attachment D - Wildlife Corridor, Existing Man.Made Features
AttaChment E - Wildlife Corridor, Proposed Development
Attachment F -Rice Creek North Regional Trail Corridor Development
Ijh
.
Attachment A
. Rioe Creek Nerth Regional Trail Corridor
Boundary Map
I
1
"1-~
l
.
.
1
1
o
1
2 Miles
"''''''~'"''''':''1
N
.
o
o
"0
o
Amet1dmen1 Pareels
Wlldl"" corridor
MN NallMaI Guard (AHA TS)
Regll)nal Trail Corridor
Ramsey County
Patk$ and Re-crelllk>n tlllpartment
October 2002
R<lgional Park
Attachment B
Rice Creek NOirth Regional Trail Corridor ·
Amendment Parcel .. Wildlife Corridor
2000 Aerial Photo
500
L..
500
1000 Feet
==:-;
N
o
@
"",
P~rCllI C and D.ElOurldaIy I
._...._--_..._._.~)
Ramsey County
Parks and Recreation Department
Oclober 2002
.
.
.
.
.
Attachment C
Rice C'reek Nrorth Regional Trail Co'rridorr
Amen'dment Parcels - WI;ldJife Corridor
Vegetation
-J
'-I
d-.
500
j"
o
NQngl'a$S Vegetation
. r_. aM ShrubS
_ W$llllnd.
-.....
L"
500
1 000 Feet
-~-~-~~::J.
A
Ram$llY County
F'lll'ks and Recreation Departmoot
October 2002
Attachmel1tD
.
Rice Crsek North Reli_na' Trail Corridoir
Amend'ment Parce'. .. Wildlife Corridor
Man-made Featurea
i
\
{
~
h
14
u
"
.
N
_.
500
LC
o soo
','"
1000 Feat
,....j
r
1_
i~
I'v ~
N
.. ......~"
,
Eluildll'lgs
-Contamination I'li>medl.ti<>n Site I
Raijroad1>
Ramsey County
Pllrk$ and Recreation Oel'artmfll\t
October 2002
.
.
.
.
Attachment E
Rice Creek North Regional TraU Corridor
Amendment Parcels - Wildlife Corridor
Proposed Development
.
.
.... ..'*
.
..
,
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
t
soo
o 500
1_ Foot
N
A
~--_..-
! .. -.,. Proposed TraM Connection)
j . '. ,
<___._....."..._..__.__._ ..___.____.__.___.J
it.... .,... :-. -.>.'.-. '..'.'-.. .'.-... .-,.. .: ...'.
I"~ ~:i=~:~rf:i_ti:n-::~ent l
- ,
, I
l Ql.Jtober 2002______ j
AtlacnmentF
Rice Creek North Reg:ional Trail Corri'do'f.
Developm:ent Concept
"
~y~.~
TFIAIL.HEAD-..
N
.. ..
Ii- .
. .
o
o
o
o
c
p
"
.
1
~ '
2 Miles
"
o
1
&Islll'l!l trail
""'poSed trail
N
A
I\rlWldtlWnt Parcel
Wildlife """idor
MN NaUon,,1 Guard (ArlATS)
Regipnel froe Corrioor
Regional Park
Rl!ms$Y Oounty
Pmks l!nd Reprel!lion Department
CanO& launch
ParKing Lot
.
October 2002
.
.
.
DRAFT
AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE AMENDMENT TO THE RICE CREEK NORTH REGIONAL
TRAIL CORRIDOR MASTER PLAN AND FUTURE ROAD AND UTILITY EASEMENTS
1.0 Parties. This Agreement is entered into by and between the City of Arden
Hills, a Minnesota statutory city (the "City") and Ramsey County (the
"County").
2.0 Recitals.
A. The Twin City Army Ammunition Plant ("TCAAP Site") is located within
the City.
B. It is anticipated that the right to utilize a portion of the TCAAP Site will
be conveyed in some manner to the County and that a portion of the
TC,4.AP Site will be conveyed to the City, all as illustrated on Exhibit A
,
attached and entitled "Transfer Area Map".
C. The County will request title to Transfer Areas A and B. The City will
request title to Transfer Areas C, D and E.
D.
The County has adopted a Regional Trail Master Plan that includes
Transfer Area A, which has been approved by the City and the
Metropolitan Council. Transfer Area B is not part of the approved
Regional Trail Master Plan.
E. The County is in the process of adopting an amendment to its Regional
Trail Master Plan entitled "Proposed Amendment to the Rice Creek North
Regional Trail Master Plan" (the "Wildlife Corridor Amendment"),
attached as Exhibit B.
F. Transfer Area B is included in the Wildlife Corridor Amendment, which
indicates that there would not be public roads or utility lines
constructed over or within Transfer Area B.
G. In order to be eligible for certain regional and state funding for park
improvement projects to be constructed in Transfer Area B, the Wildlife
Corridor Amendment must be approved by the Metropolitan Council;
and, in order to comply with Minnesota Statutes, the County's
acquisition of an interest in Transfer Area B must be approved by the
City.
H.
The City has adopted a Comprehensive Plan which has been approved by
the Metropolitan Council. The City's Comprehensive Plan includes all of
the Transfer Areas and anticipated:
DRAFT
1.
That a road would be constructed through Transfer Area B in
order to connect Transfer Areas C and E; and
.
2. That a bridge and road would be constructed over Rice Creek in
order to allow the connection of Transfer Areas C and D to County
Road I.
3.0 Terms and Conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, in reliance upon the representations
and in consideration of the mutual undertakings herein expressed, the parties
agree:
A. The City approves the Wildlife Corridor Amendment and consents to the
County's acquisition of an interest in Transfer Area B, subject to the
following conditions:
1. Prior to or concurrent with the County's acquisition of an interest
in Transfer Area B:
(a)
The County will provide to the City a road/bridge access
and utility easement across Rice Creek near 1-35W (in the
approximate location of the existing County Road H bridge)
in dimensions that would allow the cOnstruction of a
normal city street and would allow the City to link Transfer
Areas C and D. The road design, subject to review and
approval by the County, shall accommodate unrestricted
wildlife movement, drainage functions and human
recreational travel under the road. The cost of design and
construction and of the road will be borne by the City
and/or developer; and
.
(b) The County will join with the City to request that the
National Guard provide to the City a road easement from
Transfer Area E to County Road I. In the event that the
National Guard does not grant a road easement from
Transfer Area E to County Road I, the County will permit
the City to construct a road through Transfer Area B,
generally located on the alignment of the existing
north/south road. The road design, subject to review and
approval by the County, shall incorporate an elevated
section of sufficient height and width to accommodate
unrestricted wildlife movement, drainage functions and
human recreational travel under the road. The cost of
design and construction of the road will be borne by the
City and/or developer; and
.
2
.
.
.
(c)
DRAFT
The County will provide to the City a utility easement
through Transfer Area B so that utilities can be extended
from Transfer Area C to Transfer Area E.
B. The obligations of the City and the County, as defined herein, are
contingent upon Transfer Area D being conveyed to the City.
C. The City reserves the right to review and approve specific development
plans for Transfer Areas A and B.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and County have caused this Agreement to be
executed as of the date and year first above written.
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS,
a Minnesota statutory city
, Mayor
RAMSEY COUNTY
Jim McDonough, Chair
Ramsey County Board of Commissioners
Bonnie Jackelen
Chief Clerk-County Board
Date:
3
J
I
.
I
I
.
Exhibit A: Transfer Area Map
Legend
~
N
Venlo Reuse Plan
A -
B
C
o -
E
F -
Ramsey County Parks Request
Ramsey County Wildlife Corridor
Main Excess Area
Officer's Quarters Area
Primer Tracer Area
National Guard License Area
~
1\~ HILLS
(;,. '.",
'.
Comm9fdal i Offke i JruJulimal
Govf'II'nmanlCollter
-
~~
-
-
InslitutiOl'.3I
Join\CornmllniiyAIt)letic Fiel<l-s
OPt'lf1 Space
Act....O <)( P,)~$"'E' ROCfll<lliQ<1
Roo.idenliai
f......"~"...(:"."iN_."A.
~.n'<...'""...~____.,
Doc""".."",,,,
~
~HILLS
Arden Hills City Council
Monday,
December 16,2002
SPECIAL
CITY COUNCIL
MEETING
City Philosophy
To provide a basic and necessary scope of quality services through the innovative and purposeful use of resources.
Mayor:
Dennis Probst
Council Members:
Beverly Aplikowski
David Grant
Gregg Larson
Lois Rem
1245 W. Highway 96
Arden Hills, Minnesota
55112
651.634.5120
Agenda
City Council Meeting Convenes 7:00 PM
Call to Order
1. AGENDA
2. MINUTES
A. December 9, 2002 EDA
B. Deccmber 9, 2002 Council
3. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Claims and Payroll
B. Planning Commission 2003 Work Plan
C. Resolution No. 02-71 : Accepting Liabilily
Coverage Limits from the League of
Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust
D. Resolution No. 02-72: Approving lhe 2003
Fee Schedule
E. Resolution No. 02-74: Approving lhe 2003
Employee Benefit Conlribulion
4. PUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL
A. Resolution No. 02-55: Honoring Dave
Sand
B. Resolution No. 02-68: Honoring Planning
Commissioner Terri Duchenes
7:00
Those items listed under the Consent Calendar are
considered to be routine by the City Council and will be
enacted by one motion under a Consent Calendar format.
There will be no separate discussion of these items,
unless a Council Member so requests, in which event, the
item will be removed from the general order of business
and considered separately in its normal sequence on the
agenda.
Public InquiriesfInformationaJ is an opportunity for
citizens to bring to the Council's attention any items not
currently on the agenda. In addressing the Council,
please state your name and address for the record, and a
brief summary of the specific item being addressed to the
Council. To allow adequate time for each person wishing
to address the Council, we ask that individuals limit their
conunents to three (3) minutes. Written documents may
be distributed to the Council prior to the meeting, or as
bench copies, to allow a more timely presentation.
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
None
6. COMMUNITY SERVICES
A. Ramsey County Rice Creek Conidor Park Aaron Panish
Master Plan Amendment
B. Authorize Distribution of Letter to lhe Aaron Parrish
GSA
C. Planning Case No. 02-28: Volkert, Peter Hellegers
Variance for Garden Shed, 1330 Nursery
Hill Lane
D. Planning Case 02-32: Kim Tramm, Peter Hellegers
ArdenRidge PUD, Cleveland & CR E-2
E. Planning Case 02-33: Manufacturer's Peler Hellegers
Services, PUD Amendment, 4300 Round
Lake Road
F. Planning Case 02-34: North Heights Peler Hellegers
Church, SUP, 1700 Highway 96
7. OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE Tom Moore
8. ADMINISTRATION Joe Lynch
A. Cancel December 30, 2002 City Council
Meeling
B. 2003 Council Retreat Planning Report Joe Lynch and Cynthia Young
C. Approve Appointment of Joe Lynch and Cynthia Young
Office Support Specialist
D. Payment No. 18 - Rochon Corporation Joe Lynch
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
A. Council Member Grant
B. Council Member Larson
C. Council Member Aplikowski
D. Council Member Rem
E. Mayor Probst
TCAAP: Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant
PMP: Pavement Management Plan
PTRC: Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee
Arden Hills City Council Agenda
December] 6, 2002
Page 2
.
.
.
~
~~HILLS
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (EDA) MEETING
DECEMBER 9, 2002
6:30 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
CAI"L TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, President Dennis Probst called to
order the EDA Meeting at 6:32 p.m.
Present:
President Dennis Probst, Commissioners Beverly Aplikowski,
David Grant, Gregg Larson, and Lois Rem.
Absent:
None.
Also present were Executive Director, Joe Lynch; Director of Community
Services, Aaron Parrish; Secretary/Treasurer, Terrance Post; Director of
Operations and Maintenance, Thomas Moore; and Recording Secretary,
Kathleen Altman.
1.
APPROV AL OF AGENDA
MOTION: Commissioner Aplikowski moved and Commissioner Larson
seconded a motion to approve the Agenda as submitted.
The motion carried unanimously (5-0),
3. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A. Adopt 2003 Budget
Mr. Post presented the proposed 2003 budget and recommended the EDA approve
the 2003 budget.
MOTION: Commissioner Aplikowski moved and Commissioner Grant
seconded a motion to adopt the 2003 Budget as presented.
The motion carried unanimously (5-0).
ARDEN HILLS EDA MEETING - DECEMBER 4, 2000
2
B. PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution 02-1: Establishing a Policy Regarding .
Business Subsidies
President Probst opened the Public Hearing at 6:40 p.m.
Mr. Parrish stated cities are required to have a Business Subsidy Policy prior to the
granting of a business subsidy. He noted, based on input from the Commissioners,
the only change that had been made since the previous meeting was the addition of
section IV.A. This was based on the expressed desire to have the requirements
apply to all business subsidies, even those that were statutorily exempted.
There was no one present for the Public Hearing.
President Probst closed the Public Hearing at 6:42p.m.
MOTION:
Commissioner Larson moved and Commissioner Aplikowski
seconded a motion to approve EDA Resolution No. 02-0 I:
Establishing a Policy Regarding Business Subsidies as
presented. The motion carried unanimously (5-0).
ADJOURN
President Probst adjourned the Economic Development Authority Meeting at 6:43
p.m.
Dennis Probst
President
Joe Lynch
Executive Director
.
.
.
.
.
~
/]'\~ HILLS
MEETING MINUTES
Draft
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MONDAY, DECEMBER 9, 2002, 7:00 P.M.
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 1245 WEST HIGHWAY 96
CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Dennis Probst called to order
the Regular City Council meeting at 7:00 p.m.
Present:
Mayor Dennis Probst, Council Members Beverly Aplikowski,
David Grant, Gregg Larson, and Lois Rem.
Absent:
None.
Also present were City Administrator, Joe Lynch; Director of Community
Services, Aaron Parrish; City Planner, Peter Hellegers; Director of
Operations and Maintenance, Thomas Moore; City Engineers, Greg Brown
and Nick Landwer; City Accountant, Terry Post; and Recording Secretary,
Kathleen Altman.
1. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA
Mayor Probst noted Item 3.C had been moved to Item 6.F.
MOTION: Council Member Larson moved and Council Member
Aplikowski seconded a motion to adopt the revised agenda for
the December 9, 2002, Regular City Council meeting, The
motion carried unanimously (5-0).
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A.
B.
November 25, 2002 City Council Meeting
December 2,2002 Truth-in-Taxation
ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
DECEMBER 9, 2002 2
.
City Administrator Lynch requested the following changes: None.
Council Member Grant requested the following changes: December 2, 2002 Truth
in Taxation Minutes, last motion, change the word top to "to".
Council Member Larson requested the following changes: None
Council Member Aplikowski requested the following changes: None.
Council Member Rem requested the following changes: November 25,2002, page
six, add, "John Hink clarified that the 20 day timeline for the City to express a
formal interest in the property would begin on December 8 and would end on
December 27, 2002". Page eight, first paragraph, after first sentence add: "He
explained that the City needed to run upgraded electrical service to this meter pit.
The City had two options to do this, either by overhead line on a pole across
County Road D or from underground service on the north side of the property.
The recommended option was the underground service. Page eight, first .
paragraph, change existing electric pole to "existing electric service", Change
next sentence to read: Since timing is an important factor in meter replacement
and the ground is beginning to freeze,... Next sentence change He to Mr. Parrish
and add the words meter replacement between the and project. December 2, 2002
Minutes, page two, end of first paragraph to read: "discontinue applying to much
sand to streets..,"
Mayor Probst requested the following changes: None
MOTION: Council Member Grant moved and Council Member
Aplikowski seconded a motion to approve the November 25,
2002 Council Meeting Minutes and December 2, 2002 Truth in
Taxation Meeting Minutes as amended. The motion carried
unanimously (5-0).
3. CONSENT CALENDAR
a.
Claims and Payroll
.
b.
Resolution No. 02-66: A Resolution Designating Dunlap Street as an MSA
Route.
.
.
.
ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
DECEMBER 9, 2002 3
Resolution No. 02-67: A Resolution Designating Glenpaul Avenue as an
MSA Route
MOTION: Council Member Larson moved and Council Member Grant
seconded a motion to approve the Consent Calendar and
authorize execution of all necessary documents contained
therein. The motion carried unanimously (5-0).
4. PUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMA TIONAL
Mayor Probst invited any public comments that were not on the agenda. There
was no one present for the public inquiries.
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A.
Karth Lake/Ingerson 2003 PMP based on the Feasibility Report
received November 12,2002
Mayor Probst opened the public hearing at 7:07 p.m.
The City Engineers presented the proposed Karth Lake/Ingerson 2003 Pavement
Management Program.
Tom Lvnch, 3220 Hamline Avenue North, stated at the last meeting they had a
unanimous showing from the residents that they wanted a surmountable curb,
which the City Engineers did not recommend. He stated a surmountable curb was
cheaper, as it was unnecessary to have a curb cut. He stated they had also
requested a surmountable curb be connected into a flat curb for water drainage.
Dorothv Vawter, 1226 Ingerson Road, stated a lot of the proposed changes were
designed to improve water quality, She asked for clarification of the relocation of
a portion of the Femwood Channel, which is on private property, onto association
property, which was also private property. Mr. Brown replied they did not intend
to do anything to the association property. The intent was to move the channel as
close to Fernwood, to the east of the association property, as possible. He noted
the association was not losing land, but was gaining contiguous land.
ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
DECEMBER 9, 2002 4
.
Ms. Vawter asked if the association would lose access to the lakeshore property,
if the second bridge was removed. She expressed concern that with the dredging
of the channel, the banks would collapse and the channel would widen. She asked
to prevent the channel from widening. Mr. Brown replied the bridge cost was not
included, but they felt if they dredged the channel, the bridge could be salvaged.
He stated the north end bridge would not be useable anymore, but he believed the
other bridge is and they intended to reuse it. He stated they had no intention of
widening the channel. He stated they would need an easement from the
association in order to dredge the channel.
Ms. Vawter requested the association be informed as to when the Council needed
a vote regarding an easement to the property, She stated the current assessment of
the association property, based on the Ingerson Court improvements, amounted to
70 percent of the total value of the property. She stated those assessments were no
consistent with other properties. She noted that piece of property was not
marketable.
Lvnn Diaz. 1143 Ingerson Road, stated she would only be in favor of having a
trail along Hamline A venue, if trees were not removed and vegetation was
preserved. She noted she preferred bituminous for the trail surfaces. She
requested the swale off of Fernwood not be muddy because everyone used that for
boat launching. She expressed concern about the speed of traffic on Ingerson and
asked if some type of traffic control was needed. She expressed concern about the
association assessment and requested that be worked out before March. She
requested she be informed once more information became available.
.
Therese Rothmund. 1151 Carlton Drive. stated she did not want a surmountable
curb on Carlton Drive.
John Scheller. 3262 Fernwood Street. expressed concern about the association
assessment. He thanked the City Engineer for leaving Fernwood alone, however,
he stated no maintenance had been done on that street since 1989. He asked the
City to look into seal coating Fernwood, while the rest of the development was
done. Mr. Brown replied they did intend upon seal coating Fernwood and would
probably do so in 2005.
.
.
.
.
ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
DECEMBER 9, 2002 5
Mariorie Alexander, 3251 Fernwood Street, expressed concern about the
association assessment. Mayor Probst asked the Association Board to identify a
spokesperson, so the City could have a contact.
Doug Hartford, 1292 Ingerson Road, asked for clarification on the proposed
budget. He expressed concern about the association assessment.
Harold Alexander, 3251 Fernwood Street, asked where the driveway for the last
home by the association would be located. Mr. Brown stated that home would
have access to GlenpauL
Allan Stedman, 1164 Ingerson Road, asked about any redirection of sewer lines if
the roads were reconstructed that would amount to extra costs for homeowners.
Mr. Brown stated they did not anticipate any changes to either storm or sanitary
sewers.
Council Member Grant noted any water quality improvements were not accessible
to the residents on this project.
Mr. Stedman requested for the lower curbs, which he believed was appropriate
for Ingerson. He stated he had observed changes over the years in the ditch that
leads into Josephine. He asked how much study had been done in terms of water
flowage and asked if it had flowed into the lake. He stated he understood the
DNR needed to be involved with the deepening of the channel and the silt
removaL Mr. Brown replied the idea of the upper basin would be to have some
depth in the neighborhood of four to five feet. The channel would only be
excavated out using the existing banks and hopefully, there would be some
existing water, but they would not know that until they excavated. He noted once
the City had access to the channel, it would be cleaned on an annual or bi-annual
basis to remove the silt.
Mr. Stedman stated he believed the banks had not only caved in, but the channel
was also filled with silt. Mr. Brown stated once they cleaned out the channel, they
would restore the banks of the channel naturally, which should help prevent
further erosion,
Pat McDonagh, 4452 Pleasant Drive, stated they were situated on the comer cul-
de-sac and have a storm sewer located immediately behind their home, which was
ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
DECEMBER 9, 2002 6
.
not shown on the map. She noted it appeared there was something in the front of
the home and not in the back. She asked for clarification. Mr. Landwer explained
the diagram and stated they did know about the storm sewer behind Ms.
McDonagh's home.
Ms. McDonal!h stated that in the past, their home had been flooded and asked if
the City would be looking at enlarging the catch basin on the corner of their lot, to
resolve the flooding problem. Mr. Brown replied if they reconstructed Pleasant
Drive, they would propose a catch basin that would take water before it got to her
cul-de-sac, which should help her problem. He noted this was a difficult situation.
He stated the capacity of the pipe from the storm sewer on Ms. McDonagh's
property was not sufficient to allow for the drainage, but he did not believe this
was a part of the City's storm sewer project.
Mr. Moore noted the problem was not a result of storm water from the street, but
was because of the water that came from the surrounding backyards. He stated
this was a private drain system put in by the developer. .
Ms. McDonal!h asked how a developer could put in a private drain system that
tied into the City's system. Mr. Moore replied he did not know how the developer
was allowed to do this. He noted it happened many years ago.
Mr. Brown noted the City could install a larger pipe, but he would defer this to the
Council as to whether this would be a City cost or not. He also noted there might
be blockage in the six inch pipe, which would be the responsibility of the
homeowner.
Ms. McDonal!h asked how they could get the pipe televised to see if there was
blockage. Mayor Probst noted if this was not a public utility, the City was not
allowed to work on it. He requested this be a discussion for a future date.
Ms. McDonal!h asked this be settled before everything started getting dug up.
Dorothv Vawter, 1226 Ingerson Road, requested sunnountable curbs and also
indicated she would like to have wood chips on the trail and not bituminous.
.
.
.
.
ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
DECEMBER 9, 2002 7
John Scheller, stated the Rice Creek Watershed District proposed that they
increased the frequency of street cleaning to three times a year and asked the City
to follow that suggestion.
Mayor Probst closed the public hearing at 8:31 p.m.
Mayor Probst asked the Council if they wanted to proceed with the Pleasant Drive
reconstruction, what width and type of curb they wanted.
Wilbert Becker, 4435 Pleasant Drive, stated the curb in front of his home was in
need of repair and requested it be fixed.
Council Member Aplikowski recommended a 28-foot width street, with a four-
inch barrier curb unless upon meeting with the neighbors, they come up with a
different request.
A resident asked why they were recommending narrowing the street. Mr. Brown
replied it was a cost saving factor.
The resident stated she liked the width of their street the way it was,
MOTION: Council Member Aplikowski moved and Council Member
Larson seconded a motion to reconstruct Pleasant Drive to a 28
foot width street with a four inch barrier curb.
MOTION: Council Member Larson moved and Mayor Probst seconded a
motion to amend the previous motion to replace the four inch
barrier with a six inch barrier, so it was consistent with the rest
of the area.
Council Member Rem stated she believed the City needed to give the residents of
that street the opportunity to discuss this. Council Member Larson agreed and
stated they needed to poll the neighbors, but they needed to make a
recommendation tonight. If after getting feedback from the residents, the residents
wanted something different, the City could change their recommendation.
Council Member Aplikowski spoke against the amendment.
ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
DECEMBER 9, 2002 8
.
Council Member Grant stated they needed to let the resident's decide.
Council Member Aplikowski agreed they needed to get the resident's input, but
they needed to have something for the residents to respond to.
Amended motion failed (1-4). (Council Members Grant, Larson, Aplikowski, and
Rem)
Original Motion carried (4-1). (Mayor Probst)
Council Member Aplikowski directed staff to contact the residents on Pleasant
Drive by certified letter, informing them of the Council's decision and directing
them to contact the City should they have any questions.
Mr. Lynch noted they were still following the public hearing process and the
public hearing had been closed. He noted they were not bound by anything the
residents said, but what they were bound by was the decisions made tonight. He .
stated they would need to hold the public portion of this open in order to receive
further input.
Mayor Probst noted they should set some parameters for the timing of the
response. He suggested they send a letter by certified mail with a deadline date for
responses to be received.
Council Member Aplikowski asked if it was possible to have a January 10, 2003
deadline because of the holidays. Mr. Brown stated that was possible.
The two residents in attendance at tonight's meeting from Pleasant Drive stated
they were in favor of a six-inch curb. One resident had a preference to keeping the
street the same width and one resident had no preference regarding street width.
Mayor Probst asked the Council if they wanted to reconstruct, overlay with a new
curb, or do nothing on Femwood Court.
MOTION: Council Member Aplikowski moved and Council Member
Grant seconded a motion to accept the City Engineer's report to .
do nothing on Fernwood Court. The motion carried
unanimously (5-0).
.
.
.
ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
DECEMBER 9, 2002 9
Mayor Probst asked the Council what type of surmountable curb they wanted in
the Ingerson neighborhood.
MOTION: Council Member Larson moved a motion to approve a four-
inch barrier curb in the Ingerson neighborhood. The motion
failed for a lack of a second.
MOTION: Council Member Aplikowski moved and Council Member
Grant seconded a motion for a four-inch surmountable curb in
the Ingerson Neighborhood.
MOTION: Council Member Aplikowski moved and Council Member
Grant seconded a motion to amend the previous motion to state
that all streets in the Ingerson Neighborhood would have a
four-inch surmountable curb, with the exception of Carlson
Road, which would have a six-inch barrier curb.
The City Engineer recommended the motion also include Cannon Avenue. They
would inform the residents in that area of the decision.
Council Member Aplikowski accepted the City Engineer's recommendation.
Council Member Larson stated he would vote against this because he was not
comfortable with the process they were using.
The motion and amendment with the City Engineer's recommendation carried (4-
1). (Council Member Larson).
Mayor Probst asked if the Council wanted to reconstruct or remove Hamline
Avenue (north), noting the City Engineer's recommendation was to remove the
street.
MOTION: Council Member Larson moved and Mayor Probst seconded a
motion to remove Hamline A venue North.
Council Member Aplikowski stated she had a concern with closing a street that
was part of a community, She indicates she understood there was a cost factor
ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
DECEMBER 9, 2002 10
.
involved, but believed it was important for the street to remain open. The motion
carried (4-1). (Council Member Aplikowski).
Mayor Probst asked if the Council wanted to include Hamline Trail III the
improvements and if so, what width and type of surface they wanted.
Mayor Probst offered an eight foot bituminous that connected into the MSI Trail.
MOTION: Council Member Larson moved and Council Member
Aplikowski seconded a motion to approve a six foot
bituminous surface that connects to the bituminous surface on
the insurance company property.
Council Member Grant stated he would prefer a wood chip trail.
MOTION: Council Member Aplikowski moved and Mayor Probst
seconded a motion to amend the six foot bituminous surface to
an eight foot bituminous surface.
.
Council Member Rem stated she was in favor of a six foot, wood chip trail.
The amendment carried (4-1). (Council Member Rem)
The original motion carried (3-2). (Council Members Rem and Grant)
MOTION: Council Member Grant moved and Council Member Larson
seconded a motion that would exclude the three car parking lot
from the design. The motion carried unanimously (5-0).
MOTION: Council Member Grant moved that all streets in the Ingerson
Neighborhood be 28-feet, with exception of Ingerson Court,
which is 24-feet, and North Hamline Avenue - south of
Ingerson Court, which is 26-feet. Motion died for lack of a
second.
MOTION: Council Member Aplikowski moved and Mayor Probst .
seconded a motion that requires all roads to be 28 feet, with
.
.
.
ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
DECEMBER 9, 2002 11
the exception ofIngerson Court, which is 24 feet. The motion
carried unanimously (5-0).
MOTION: Council Member Larson moved and Council Member
Aplikowski seconded a motion to authorize staff to accept the
final plans and specifications for the Karth Lake/Ingerson 2003
PMP. The motion carried unanimously (5-0).
Mayor Probst recessed the meeting at 9:50 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at
9:57 p.m.
MOTION: Council Member Grant moved and Council Member
Aplikowski seconded a motion to extend the meeting until
II :00 p.m. The motion carried unanimously (5-0).
6. COMMUNITY SERVICES
A.
Planning Case No. 02-20: Nelson PUD Amendment, Cleveland and
County Road D
Mr. Parrish explained the applicant was requesting an amendment to a previously
approved Master and Final Planned Unit Development, to construct an office
building at the corner of County Road D and Cleveland A venue. He stated the
Planning Commission recommended that the proposed Master and Final Plan
Planned Unit Development be approved with conditions.
Mayor Probst noted this was a better project than what was originally approved
and he would support it.
Council Member Larson agreed the development was improved and did not have a
problem with the balconies, noting that if a residential home was built on the
property they could have a balcony and the neighbors would have no say in it.
MOTION: Council Member Larson moved and Council Member
Aplikowski seconded a motion to approve Planning Case No.
02-20: Aaron Nelson, Master and Final Plan PUD Amendment,
County Road D and Cleveland A venue conditioned on the
removal of the on-street parking,
ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
DECEMBER 9, 2002 12
.
Mark McGuire, 2030 GlenDaul Avenue, stated he was disappointed the Council
had changed their mind from the last meeting. He stated along his property, very
little had changed and he still had concerns with this development. He presented
to the Council the preferences of what the residents in the area would like to see.
Don Ristow, 2033 W. County Road E, stated he was angry about this
development. He noted the changes did not satisfy the requests the neighbors
made at the last meeting. He stated they had already lost their woods, and now
they were being required to lose their privacy. He noted the ramps were right by
his bedroom windows. He stated the decks were overlooking his yard. He stated
going from a one and one-half story to a two story was a drastic change. He noted
it was more realistic to have a one-story building in a residential area. He stated
the building would stand out in this area and would not fit the neighborhood. He
requested the City not to approve this.
Kim LUl!:er, 2026 GlenDaul Avenue, stated she had never been contacted by Mr. .
Nelson regarding the landscaping issues. She expressed concern that the lot had
been cleared of all landscaping and her screening was now, no longer there. She
presented options she believed would work for this development, with respect to
screening. She stated she was against the outside decks.
Kathv Nelson, 3475 Siems Court, stated she was offended someone would call
her husband a cheat and a manipulator. She stated they were trying to build a
quality building in the City and they were not manipulators. She stated her
husband had worked very hard with the neighbors and reworked the plans so they
were acceptable to the City and community.
Mrs. Osborn, 2029 GlenDaul A venue, asked why all of the trees were removed
from the lot. She stated she planted one of the trees when her son went to college.
She stated they should have been informed that the trees would be removed. She
added that some trees should have been left for privacy until the new ones were
planted. She asked why the building had to be a two-story building,
Steve Nelson, 3475 Siems Court, stated the trees that were removed were not of
high quality. It was the recommendation of the landscaping company to remove .
all of them and start over again. He stated they could put a roof over the trash
enclosure, but that would make it much larger because they would need to be able
.
.
.
ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
DECEMBER 9, 2002 13
to flip up the lid. He stated he had hand delivered the letters to the residents and
placed the letters in between the doors. He stated the building was compatible and
complimentary to the neighborhood. He noted when the trees grew out, they
would provide adequate screening. He stated there were power lines that ran
along the lot and they had to be careful that they did not plant trees that would
grow into the power lines. He stated he was not in support of an eight-foot fence
for maintenance reasons, as well as the safety reasons, since eight foot fences were
easier to topple in high winds.
Mayor Probst stated he recognized that the residents were not happy with the
project, but he did not believe the residents would not be happy with any
development on the site. He stated this was a better project than the currently
approved PUD, and he would be supporting the motion.
MOTION: Council Member Grant moved and Council Member
Aplikowski seconded a motion to extend the meeting to
midnight. The motion carried unanimously (5-0).
The main motion carried unanimously (5-0).
Mr. Parrish requested item 6F be moved before item 6B.
F. Authorize Execution of CUB Foods Development Agreement
Mr. Parrish presented the Master and Final Planned Unit Development between
the City and CUB Foods. He noted CUB Foods intended to begin construction
next spring and hoped to be completed by next fall.
Council Member Larson questioned the landscaping plan and asked for
clarification.
Paul Tucci, Oppidan Development, stated when they had spoken the last time at
the meeting, Council Member Larson wanted landscaping along both sides of the
building. He stated the original plans called for a sidewalk and they eliminated the
sidewalk and put in shrubs instead. He noted it was difficult to see this on the
plan, but the landscaping was proposed to be on both sides of the building.
ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
DECEMBER 9, 2002 14
.
MOTION: Council Member Aplikowski moved and Council Member
Grant seconded a motion to authorize execution of the CUB
Foods Development Agreement. The motion carried
unanimously (5-0).
B. Resolution No. 02-62: Approving the Final Levy 2003.
The City Accountant, Mr. Post, eXplained the Council has had several meetings in
2002 reviewing and preparing the budget for 2003. On December 2, 2002, the
Council held its Truth-in-Taxation Hearing to review the proposed budget and
levy. After the completion ofthis hearing, the City Council provided no additional
discussion comments relative to the proposed levy, which represents a 2.94%
increase over the payable 2002 levy.
MOTION: Council Member Grant moved and Council Member
Aplikowski seconded a motion to approve Resolution No. 02-
62: Clarifying Final Sums of Money to be Levied for Levy .
Year 2002, Payable in 2003" The motion carried unanimously
(5-0).
C. Resolution No. 02-63: Approving the 2003 Budget
Mr. Post recommended approving the 2003 budget.
MOTION: Council Member Larson moved and Council Member
Aplikowski seconded a motion to approve Resolution No. 02-
63: Approving the 2003 Budget. The motion carried
unanimously (5-0).
D. Resolution No. 02-65: Adopting and Confirming Annual Special
Assessments for Utilities
Mr. Post stated the City had historically followed a policy annually certifying
delinquent utility bills to following year property taxes as a means of collecting
delinquent utility accounts instead ofa water shutoff policy.
.
MOTION: Council Member Larson moved and Council Member
Aplikowski seconded a motion to approve Resolution No. 02-
.
.
.
ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
DECEMBER 9, 2002 15
65: Adopting and Confirming Annual Special Assessments for
Utilities. The motion carried unanimously (5-0),
E. TCAAP Update
Mr. Parrish stated the Development Team met on November 26, 2002. The
Advisory Panel had its kick off meeting on November 19, 2002. He stated the
meeting provided the panel information about the site and planning process. He
stated staff had worked with the Development Team to amend the project budget
outlined in the interim development agreement. He stated staff was working with
Ramsey County regarding their proposed Park Master Plan Amendment (Wildlife
Corridor). He noted there was a letter sent by the Post Office to the GSA,
indicating their interest in an 82 acre parcel, where building 105 was located.
Mayor Probst stated he believed the Post Office interest was an issue that merited
significant discussion, and his personal view was that the City ought to oppose it,
based on the fact that this was not a use that fit with the Vento Master Plan. He
stated he did not believe a distribution center was the appropriate use for this area
and would not be in the City's best interest. He encouraged the future Council
take a strong stand against this proposal.
7. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE
None.
8. ADMINISTRATION
A. 2003 Liquor License
Mr. Lynch presented a list of establishments in the City who were renewing their
liquor license for the 2003 licensing year. Staff was requesting the Council
approve all applicants.
MOTION: Council Member Grant moved and Council Member
Aplikowski seconded a motion to approve the 2003 Liquor
Licenses as submitted. The motion carried unanimously (5-0).
B. Ramsey County Proposed Environmental Response Fund
ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
DECEMBER 9, 2002 16
.
Mr. Lynch eXplained staff previously had presented the Council with information
about the proposed Ramsey County Proposed Environmental Response Fund for
information purposes. He noted at this time, staff was presenting information
based on their understanding that the Ramsey County Board will be discussing
this shortly and making a decision about whether to proceed in 2003 with
collection of an Environmental Response Fund fee for each deed registration in
Ramsey County. He asked for the Council's thoughts, recommendations, and
comments regarding whether the Council officially wanted to respond to Ramsey
County.
Council Member Larson stated he would prefer the County authorize spending of
fund in proportion of funds collected by the municipalities. He stated the City
should be able to spend the amount they collect from Arden Hills in Arden Hills.
Mayor Probst stated he feared it was another call for revenue from the community
that would be spent elsewhere. He stated unless there were assurances from the .
County about how money would be distributed or used over time, he would be
reluctant to support it.
Council Member Aplikowski stated she objected to this because it was a tax from
people who needed their money the most and it was an unfair tax, even though
they could legally do it.
Council Member Grant stated he agreed with Council Member Larson that if they
supported this, that the funds were spent in proportion to the amount of funds
collected by each municipality.
The consensus was that the money should come back to the origin of funding.
Mr. Lynch stated he would write a letter setting forth the Council's
recommendation.
C. Lake Johanna Joint Powers Agreement
Mr. Lynch stated the City has been in a Joint Powers Agreement with the Lake .
Johanna Fire Department and various cities in the area. He noted the City of
.
.
.
ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
DECEMBER 9, 2002 17
Roseville would like to get out of the Joint Powers Agreement and the Cities of
Vadnais Heights and Falcon Heights would like to join.
MOTION: Council Member Larson moved and Council Member
Aplikowski seconded a motion to approve the Joint Powers
Agreement, contingent upon the review by the City Attorney
and approval as to form and language. The motion carried
unanimously (5-0).
10. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Council Member Grant stated he had nothing to report,
Council Member Larson stated with respect to the intersection of Snelling and the
access road to Bethel, he had spoken with Mr. Kunkle regarding this issue. He
stated he believed the potential for an accident at that intersection was high either
with a vehicle or a pedestrian. He requested City staff talk to Bethel and Ramsey
County about the possibility of putting in small islands for traffic control.
Council Member Aplikowski requested when the retreat dates were firmed up,
they get them as soon as possible.
Council Member Rem stated she had nothing to report.
Mayor Probst noted the National Association of Installation Developers was
having a conference in January and encouraged someone from Council and staff
attend these conferences. He stated he was unsure if he would make next week's
Council meeting, He publicly thanked the staff for all of their assistance while he
was Mayor. He thanked the residents for giving him the opportunity to serve as
Mayor for two terms.
RECESS
Mayor Probst adjourned the Regular City Council Meeting at I I :35 p.m.
ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
DECEMBER 9, 2002 18
Dennis Probst
Mayor
Joe Lynch
City Administrator
NOTICE OF MEETINGS
The next Council Meeting will be held Monday, December 16, 2002 at 7:00 p.m.
at the Arden Hills Council Chambers.
.
.
.
~
.
.
.
~
~
EN HILLS
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
Agenda Item 3.A
December 12, 2002
TO:
Mayor Dennis Probst
Council Member Beverly Aplikowski
Council Member David Grant
Council Member Gregg Larson
Council Member Lois Rem
FROM:
Terry Post, City Accountant
SUBJECT:
Claims
Attached:
Claims
,
.
.
.
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CLAIMS REPORT
TO BE APPROVED AT 12/16/02 COUNCIL MEETING
PAGEIOF2
CLAIMS PAID SINCE LAST COUNCIL MEETING (12/09/02)
. . <vtNl!Olt< """""",,,,',,,',,,,,',',',,,,<,',,,' ',',AMOONT,'" ".'
22250 12/10/02 Lakes Countrv Service Coonerative 6,078.95 Pre.-Paid Janunrv Insurance
22251 12/10/02 Fortis Benefits 323.33 December Lonp Term Disabilitv
22252 12/10/02 Postmaster 51.80 Christmas Stamos.BusinesSJRecreation
22253 12/10/02 Xcel Enero" 1,436.09 Oct/Nov Service
22254 12ilO/02 Michelle Olson 118.20 Mileage Expense Reimbursement
22255 12il1l02 Postmaster 1,700.00 Posmge-Penrrrit#1962
22256 12/11102 :MN State Treasurer 3,227.03 Building Petroit SurchaTl!e 2nd & 3rd Otr
I Subtotal- Paid Claims 12.935.40 I
Paid Claims From Above -
12,935.40
Add Unpaid Claims, Page 2 of 2 -
250380.24
Total Accounts Payable Claims
for Council Approval, 12/16/02-
263,315.64
Note: Checks for unpaid claims totaling$l23,654.03 were mailed on De<:ember 10, 2002
after approval at the December 9,2002 Council Meeting. They were check numbers
22206-22249. This sequence corresponds to lmpaid temporary numbers TOl - T44.
Check numbers 22204 - 22205 were used for alignment.
_yl~p'l""Wd.imsl
,
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
ACCOUN'I'S PAYABLE CLAIMS REPORT
TO BE APPROVED AT 12/16/02 COUNCIL MEETING
PAGE20F2
.
UNPAID CLAIMS REGISTER,
t :rEM~It:: I C](ollkili! ViitiliilK< """"""""""""''':'"'"",,,",,.,1 ) :~M'ov*f: I "coM~feN'I'S" """"'<>>>>>>>>>>>>1
Tl 12/17102 American Plannin2: Association 184.00 2003 Membershin-Parrish
Tl 12/17/02 Aramark Uniform SerVice 28.32 RU2: Service 12106/02
TJ 12/17102 Busii1ess Fotms & Accounting 323.40 W-2 Fonns & Envelones
T4 ]2/17102 Cflrnmte Exm-es:s 176.35 OUice Sunnlies/Conv Paner
T5 12/17/02 Davanrti's 308.91 Election Dav-Meals OudlTes)
T6 12/17/02 Davies Water EQuipment 1,125.19 Hvdrant Parts
T7 12117/02 Electro Watchman, Ine 504.81 Alann Service~O & M 12/02-02103
T8 12/17/02 Frattallbne's HardWare 96.33 December Purchases
T9 12/17102 GODher State-One Call 38.75 November Service
TlO ]2117/02 Hvdrant Specialist, Inc. 400.00 ~drant ~air-l-IamlineJWvncrest
Tl1 ]2117/02 WB.Capital 1,100.42 C~er-Excess Prints 8/24-11/19
Tl2 12117102 l.V.O.E. Local 49 240.00 December PavroU Deductions
Tl3 12117102 Kinko's 43.45 Park & Rec F1 ers
Tl4 12117/02 Mever Enterprises 167.21 Starter-#16 Tanker
Tl5 12117102 MN Dent of Agriculture 10.00 2003 NCP A Renewal-Winkel
Tl6 12/17102 MTI Distributing Co. 384.85 Groundsmaster Parts
T17 12117/02 North Metro Insoections, Inc. 85L20 November Electrical Im;nections
T18 12117/02 Nuisance Wildlife Control 186.38 Beaver Removal-Round Lake
T19 12117/02 OSI Environmental 50.00 Filter DisDOsal-Haz Waste
TlO 12/17102 Post, Terrance 59.53 Milea2e/ExnCllse Reimbursement
T21 12117102 Postmastei:"-St. Paul 300.00 1st Class Presort/Standard Bulk Fees~2003
Tl2 12/17102 Prairie Eauim:neilt Co. 127.80 Renair-Trnck #17
Tl3 12117102 Prostaff 533.52 Temn-OSS-Silseth WE ]2/01102
T24 12117/02 Quick Silver 53.05 Delivery Char2cs-EclctionsJ Admin
T25 12117/02 Rams-ev County 58,199.85 Dee Law Enforcement
T26 12117/02 Reed, Fred 39.99 2002 Uniform Purchase
Tl7 ]2/17/02 RoseviUe, City of 183,878.11 3002 Water Purchase 121M/2Q02 Adi 4.65M
Tl8 ] 2117102 Scherer Brothers Lumber Co. 66.20 Electrical Panel Materials
T29 12117102 Soriot pes 108.44 Cellular Phone Service
TJO 12/17/02 Stanton GrotlO 100.00 FSA Admin Fees-November
Bl 12/17102 Target Stores 75.58 Christmas Decorations-Citv Hall
B2 12/17102 TimeSaver Off-Site Secretarial 564.00 Rec Sec-CC 11/25-PkC 11126-PC 12/04
B3 12/17102 United Rental 54.60 Saw Rental
II Total- Unpaid Claims m 250,380.24 II
.
,......y...,"'....p.y&bl<l,loimol
.
.. .. is: ~ .. ~ ;J.
. . "
>> < .g 0
0 0 0
0 0 >> :;- . S" ~>>
. ;; ;; . . "
R R S en .'1
" " .. is:
. 0
0 0 :;. " >>
8 8 . S' ~
~- ! o.
" 0 .
eo'" 0
>>
0" 0" 0 0
>>
0 0 0 .
. '" . .
" . "
.., " 0
" .., '"
>> .
S' 0
S' i;
R
10
3
<I ~
![ E. ~
"' J:l 0
o..q<: 5i
~ g- @
~ p.. ~
" 0
~ "
>> 3
o
'"
S' 0 1:' 8 ~ ~
. " < 8- eo >>
z o' S; 0 0
'" 0 . . ~ " I:l
3 a . . ..
. "' . ~
. S' '" ~
3 < 0 ~ g. ::1.
. a il
>> 0 .. 0.
;; ~ 0 ~ S
>> " ~"
. ~ .
a a
3 E
.
>
......
oc.
0"
w=:
~=
0_
.. -
:or;-'"
",=,"1:1
--
'" Il>
== =:
",,=:
= ..
O =:
~Iltl
11'(":)
~ 0
s, a
..
::1. a
" ..
::!. ~
4 ~.
~o
==
:.-
'"
g
Q.
.
.
w
=
.
.
.
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 02-71
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE LIABILITY COVERAGE LIMITS FROM THE
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES INSURANCE TRUST (LMCIT)
WHEREAS, the City of Arden Hills DOES NOT WAIVE the monetary limits on
municipal tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04,
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL YED: The City of Arden Hills accepts liability coverage
limits of two million dollars ($2,000,000.00) from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance
Trust (LMCIT) for calendar year 2003.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS THIS
16th DAY OF DECEMBER, 2002.
DENNIS PROBST, MAYOR
ATTEST:
JOSEPH p, LYNCH, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
.
.
.
~
~HILLS
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 02-72
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE FEE SCHEDULE FOR 2003
WHEREAS, Section 310 of the Arden Hills Municipal Code provides that permit/license fees be
established from time to time by Resolution adopted by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the Council has expressed a desire to review the fee schedule on a regular basis;
and
WHEREAS, staffhas completed a formal review of all fees charged by the City, and would
recommend that the attached fee schedule for the year 2003;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Arden Hills that
the attached fee schedule be adopted:
(See Attachment)
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that these fees shall become effective January 1,2003.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
THIS 16'h DAY OF DECEMBER, 2002.
ATTEST:
DENNIS PROBST, MAYOR
JOSEPH P. LYNCH, ClTY ADMINISTRATOR
~
~HILLS
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
2003 FEE SCHEDULE
(includes sales tax where appropriate)
(Effective January I, 2003)
I. ADMINISTRATIVE
Administrative Animal Handliu
Dis osal:
1m oundment:
Residential Do Kennel License
Meetin Documents
Minutes
Re ular Ci Council Meetin
Regular Planning Commission
Meetin
Regular City Council Meeting
Agendas
A enda Packets
Cost based on
.
$22.00
22.00
5.00
12.00
12.00
2.00
22.00
20.00
20.00
40,00
60.00
10.00
.
$64.00
51.00
20.00
H,OO
12.00
MlG
VARIES
VARIES
Miscellaneous Administrative Fees
Counter and/or Per Side (any size) $ 0.25
Special Document
Photocopv Requests
Assessment Search Per half hour 20.00
Res. #01-28, Adopted 12/17/01 - Effective 1/1/02 Page 2
.
.
.
.
II.
BUILDING CONSTRUCTION
Building Permits Fees are based upon Table lA
of the 1997 VB.C. and are
determined by the City's
Building Official.
Plan Review Fee 65% of Building Permit Fee
Re- Insnection $20.00
STATE SURCHARGE .0005 x construction value
Mobile Home $50.00
Location Permit
Demolition Includes: Wrecking, 50.00
relocating and moving
buildings (for all types of
buildings, including mobile
home relocation)
Swimminl! Pool 50.00
STATE SURCHARGE 0.50
III. ZONING PERMITS
Fence Construction Base Fee $15.00
Plus Per 100 Feet 6.00
Blacktop or Base Fee $18.00
Concrete Sidewalks,
Parking Lots,
Drivewavs
Plus Per 100 Feet 6.00
Plumbim~ Minimum Fee $35.00
. Residential 1.25% of Bid
. Commercial, 1.25% of Total Bid
Industrial, plus $50.00
Institutional
STATE SURCHARGE **0.50
**Surcharge computation is based on the permit fee.
Surcharge eauals 0.0005 of each nermit fee, or $.50, whichever is greater.
Res. #01-28, Adopted 12/17/01 - Effective 1/1/02 Page 3
Electrical Permit Minimum Fee
Maximum Fee $110.00 for Sin Ie Famil Dwelling
Other fees are based on amperage and are
determined b the City's Electrical Ins ector.
STATE SURCHARGE
*$22.00
.
0.50
Heating or Minimum Fee $35.00
Mechanical Permit
. Residential 1.25% of total bid
. Commercial, 1.25% of Total Bid
Industrial, plus $50.00
Institutional
STATE SURCHARGE **0.50
Surcharge computation is based on the permit fee.
Surcharge equals .0005 of each Dermit fee, or $.50, whichever is greater.
Fire Protection Fees are based upon Table lA
Permit of the 1997 D.B.C. and are
determined by the City's
Building Official.
Plan Review Fee 65% of Fire Permit Fee
Re-Insoection $20.00
STATE SURCHARGE .50
Surcharge computation is based on the permit fee.
Surcharge equals .0005 of each permit fee, or $.50, whichever is greater.
.
IV. LlOUOR/ALCOHOLlC BEVERAGES (Fees Paid Annuallv)
Li(luor (Annual- No pro-ratinl!)
On-Sale 1,999 square feet (SF) or less $3,300.00
2,000 - 2,999 SF 4,400.00
3,000 - 3,999 SF 5,500.00
4,000 SF or more 6,600.00
Sunday On-Sale 200.00
Off Sale 200.00
Club Fee 300.00
Investigation Fee 150.00
Malt Beverages On-Sale 120.00
Off-Sale 40.00
Wine On-Sale *2,000
(*or half of On-Sale License Fee - whichever is less)
Strong Beer *No Charge
(*as Dart of On-Sale Wine License)
.
Res. #01-28, Adopted 12/17/0] - Effective 111/02 Page 4
.
.
.
V.
MAPS AND ORDINANCES
Ordinances Zoning $27.00
Sign 11.00
Subdivision 11.00
Code of Ordinance 107.00
Comnrehensive Plan 60.00
Maps Zoning (8 x II) - B/W No Charge
(I' .-. hOO
Zoning (8 x 11) - COLOR 2.00
(] , ,;" ~
Streets 2.00
Conies of As-Builts 5.00
VI. PARKS AND RECREATION FEE SCHEDULE
Ball Field Rental** Per Dav $30.00+
Ice Rink Rental** Per Day 30.00+
Warming House Per Day 30.00+
Rental**
Picnic Shelters Includes two (2) picnic tables 30.00+
and one (I) trash container per dav
*Plus a Refundable $100.00 Damacre Deposit
Additional Picnic Tables Each 25.00
'-- Additional Trash Containers Each 5.00
Community Annual 20.00
Garden Plots
**Onlv allowed during non-Dublic use hours.
L_ +Non-Resident Fees are $70.00 Per Hour or Dav as applicable.
VII. PLANNING AND ZONING
Preliminary Plat *25.00/Iot + consulting fees *$400.00
and escrow 250.00
Final Plat *Included in Preliminary Plat N/A
+ consulting fees
Lot SplitlMinor * + consulting fees *300.00
Subdivision 175.00
RezoninglComprehen * + consulting fees *300.00
sive Plan Amendment 250.00
Variance * + consulting fees *250.00
125.00
Res. #01-28, Adopted 12/17/01- Effective 1/1/02 Page 5
Special Use Permit * + consulting fees *300.00
(SUP)/ Amended SUP 200.00
Planned Unit * + consulting fees and escrow *600.00
Development (PUD) 300.00
Vacation of Easement * + consulting fees and escrow *250.00
125.00
Apportionment of * + consulting fees *30.00
Assessments
Zoning Ordinance *+ consulting fees and escrow *300.00
Amendment 250,00
VIII. UTILITY HOOK-UP CHARGES
Water Permit Water Service Installation $35.00
Interior Plumbing (New 5.00
Home)
Interior Plumbing (Existing 10.00
Home)
Temporary Water Shut 30.00
OfflTurn On
Permanent Water Disconnect 200.00
Fee
Curb Box and Service Lead: 150.00
. I" Service connection on
unsurfaced street
Larger than I" Service *Set by Engineer
Connection
Plan Check Fee *Set by Inspector
Re- Inspection 10.00
STATE SURCHARGE 0.50
Water Meter/Spacer Charl!es
Customer Fee includes removal of meter, $100.00
Requested Water bench test at maintenance
Meter Accuracy facility, and returning meter to
Test residence****
Fee will not be applied ifthe meter is found to be inaccurate to a degree exceeding three
percent (3%) from the result of the bench test.
Res. #01-28, Adopted 12/17/01- Effective 1/1/02 Page 6
.
.
.
.
.
.
Water Meter/Spacer Charl!es
. Radio Read Water Meter/Spacer Charees
Meter Size* Total Denosit/Installed
3/4" x 7-1/2" Meter $325.00
3/4" x 9" Meter 350.00
I" Meter 390.00
1-1/2" Meter 630.00
2" Meter 790.00
*lflarger than 2", call the Director of Operations and Maintenance for Price Ouote.
Sewer Permit New Connections $35.00
Alterations/Repairs 35.00
(Minimum Fee)
Plan Check Fee *Set by Insoector
Inspections *Set bv Insoector
Re-Inspection *VARIES
*(Consult City Building Official)
SAC. *VARIES
*(Included in Building Permit Fee)
I STATE SURCHARGE 0,50
Storm Utility Prohibited Sump Pump $100.00
Connection Surcharge per month
IX. MISCELLANEOUS/RETAIL ACTIVITIES
Boutique/Garage Application/notification of N/A
Sale City Hall required
Casual Roadside Application/notification of N/A
Stands Citv Hall required
Tent Permit $50.00
Sidewalk Sales 50.00
Amusement Includes: Arcade, dance hall, 100.00
Facilities movie theater, poollbilliard
tables, bowling alleys, indoor
tennis, skating facility,
outdoor tennis, driving ranges,
etc. (Refer Code)
Bulk Fuel Storage Wholesale - Liability 200.00
~. Insurance Required
Res. #01-28, Adopted 12/17/01-Effective 1/1/02 Page 7
Charitable Investigation Fee 100.00
Gambling Premises
Permit
Grocery Per 1,000 Square Feet (SF) or 20.00
fraction thereof
Hotel/Motel Per Room 6.00
Courtesv Bench Non-Advertising per bench 25.00
With Advertising per bench 75.00
Massage Per Facility 3,000.00
Parlor/Sauna
Personal Service License 100.00
Mechanical and/or Includes: Amusement devices, Refer Code
Electronic musical devices, amusement
Recreation Device rides, bowling allevs, etc.
I Device 50.00
2 - 4 Devices 100.00
5 -10 Devices 275.00
11-15 Devices 605.00
16 and over 900.00
Retail Sales Includes: Antique shops, 50.00
beautylbarber shops, boat
dealers, Christmas tree sales,
dry cleaning, laundry, bakery,
candy, meats, wholesale foods,
caterers, motor vehicle
sales, optometrist, mortuary,
video sales/rentals,
over-the-counter cigarette
sales, vending machines
(excluding cigarettes), and the
selling of retail goods
or services not listed
Retail Cigarette 200.00
Sales
Restaurants - Cafes, Per 1,000 Square Feet (SF) or 20.00
Coffee Houses, etc. fraction thereof
Restaurants - 300.00
Drive-thru
Service Stations Liability Insurance Required 100.00
Res. #01-28, Adopted 12/17/01- Effective 1/1102 Page 8
.
.
.
.
.
.
X.
SIGNS
Initial FeelPer Si!ITI $50.00
STATE SURCHARGE 0.50
(per permit)
Annnal Renewal 100 Square Feet* (SF) or less 20.00
FeeIPer Sign *Maximum allowable size
Temoorarv 50.00
STATE SURCHARGE .50
Imooundment First Offense N/C- Warning
Second Offense 20.00
Third Offense 40.00
XI. MISCELLANEOUS FEES/PERMITS
Annual Rubbish $100.00
Hauler
LContractor' License 30.00
Res. #01-28, Adopted 12/17/01 - Effective 1/1/02 Page 9
.
.
.
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 02-74
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 2003 CITY CONTRIBUTION TO THE
NON-BARGAINING UNIT EMPLOYEE MONTHLY BENEFlTS
WHEREAS, the City Council approved four-hundred twelve ($412.00) per employee,
per month, shall be the Cities contribution toward non-bargaining employee benefits in calendar
year 2002,
WHEREAS, the City Council approved a three percent (3%) Increase to the
aforementioned contribution for calendar year 2003,
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of Arden Hills does hereby
approve four-hundred twenty four dollars ($424.00) per month, per employee, shall be included
in the calendar year 2003 City Contribution to the Non-Bargaining Unit Employees Benefits.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS THIS
16th DAY OF DECEMBER, 2002.
DENNIS PROBST, MAYOR
ATTEST:
JOSEPH P. LYNCH, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
LMCIT LIABILITY COVERAGE - WAIvER FORM
Cities obtaining liability coverage from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust must decide .
whether or not to waive the statutory tort liability limits to the extent of the coverage purchased. The
decision to waive or not to waive the statutory limits has the following effects:
If the city does not waive the statutory tort limits, an individual claimant would be able to recover no
more than $300,OOO.on any claim to which the statutory tort limits apply. The total which all claimants
would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would be limited
to $1,000,000. These statutory tort limits would apply regardless of whether or not the city purchases
the optional .excess liability coverage.
.
If the city waives the statutory tort limits and does not purchase excess liability coverage, a single
claimant could potentially recover up to $1,000,000. on a single occurrence. The total which all
claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would
also be Iimitec;i to $1,000,000., regardless of the number of claimants.
.
If the city waives the statutory tort limits and purchases excess liability coverage, a single claimant
could potentially recover an amount up to the limit of the coverage purchased. The total which all
claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would
also be limited to the amount of coverage purchased, regardless of the number of claimants.
Claims to which the statutory municipal tort limits do not apply are not affected by this decision.
This. decision must be made by the city council. Cities purchasing coverage must complete and return .
this.form to LMCIT before the effective date ofthe coverage. For further information, contact LMCIT,
You may also wish to discuss these issues with your city attorney.
The City of HrPiut ;//t accepts liability coverage limits of$ z,tJ!J0t1tJl
. Minnesota Cities InsuranceTrust (LMCIT). '. ' I
from the League of
Check one:
, ~ The city DOES NOT WAIVE the monetary limits on municipal tort liability established
by Minnesota Statutes 466.04.
_ The city WAIVES the monetary limits on tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes
466.04, to the extent of the limits of the liability coverage obtained from LMCIT,
Date of city council meeting
Signature
Position
Return this c~mpletedfonn to !MClT, 145 University Ave. w., St. Paul, MN. 55103-2044
.
Page I of 1
1<-TSOL'll'I10N NO. 02-55
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
'Reso{ution Of .Jtppreciation to
V.Jt1'IV S.JtND
WHEREAS, Mr. David Sand has been appointed to the North Suburban
Communications Commission; and,
WHEREAS, Mr. Sand has served as an active member of the North Subnrban
Communications Commission for the last year; and,
WHEREAS, Mr. Sand has resigned from his position on the North Suburban
Commnnications Commission; and,
WHEREAS, Mr. Sand gained the respect and gratitude of those who had the
privilege of working with him on the North Suburban Communications Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Arden Hills, on behalf of the residents of the City of Arden Hills, expresses its appreciation
to David Sand for his dedicated and devoted service on the North Suburban
Communications Commission.
.Jtdoyted this 16''' day of 'December, 2002.
:Mayor Vennis 'Proost
CounciCm.em6er 1Jever{y .7I.y{iRuwslii
Counci{memoer Vavitf (jrant
CounciCmemoer (jreee Larson
counciCmemoer Lois nem
ATTEST:
Joseph. P. Lynch.
RESOLUTION NO. 02-68
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION FOR TERRI DUCHENES
WHEREAS, Ms. Terri Duchenes has been appointed and reappointed to the Arden Hills
Planning Commission; and,
WHEREAS, Ms. Duchenes served as an active member of the Planning Commission for a
number of years; and,
WHEREAS, Ms. Duchenes has resigned from her position on the Planning Commission
after many years of dedicated service; and,
WHEREAS, in her tenure, Ms. Duchenes gained the respect and gratitude of those who
had the privilege of working with her on the Planning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Arden Hills, on
behalf of the residents of the City of Arden Hills, expresses its appreciation to Ms. Terri Duchenes
for her dedicated and devoted service on the Arden Hills Planning Commission.
Adopted this 16th day of December, 2002.
Mayor Dennis Probst
Council member Beverly Aplikowski
Councilmember David Grant
Council member Gregg Larson
Council member Lois Rem
ATTEST:
City Administrator Joe Lynch
J
.
.
.
~
'l'\~LLS
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
6.B
December 11, 2002
Agenda Item
TO:
Mayor Dennis Probst
Council Metnber Beverly Aplikowski
Council Member David Grant
Council Member Gregg Larson
Council Member Lois Rem
Joe Lynch, City Administrator
Aaron Parrish - Community Services Director fJf
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Authorize distribution of Letter to the GSA
ENCLOSURES:
1. December 18, 2002 Letter to the GSA
2. December 10, 2002 from Kathleen Wallace, DNR Regional Director
OverView
Attached is a letter to the GSA and Anny indicating the City's interest in pursuing acquisition of
TCAAP property via early transfer authority. This item was considered at the November 25,
2002 City Council meeting. The Council took the following action at that time:
MOTION:
Council Metnber Grant moved and Council Member Rem seconded a
motion to table "Authorize distribution of letter to the GSA and Anny" to
the December 16, 2002 Council Meeting.
The tnotioncarried (3-2).
The letter requests that a Finding of Suitability for Early Transfer (FOSET) be prepared. In
addition, the letter requests that the GSA and Anny begin the process of requesting a covenant
deferral from the Governor's office. As discussed at a previous Work Session, the letter requests
that steps be taken to begin the early transfer process, however, it does not obligate the City to a
transfer. Finally, since this item was discussed at the November 25th meeting, staff has added
language more clearly identifying the areas the City would like to pursue via an early transfer. It
is hoped that this is responsive the request made in Kathleen Wallace's December 10, 2002
letter.
Requested Action
Sign and authorize distribution of the letter to the GSA
,
~-
EN HILLS
.
December 18, 2002
Mr. Glenn Rotondo
Deputy Regional Administrator
U.S. General Services Administration
10 Causeway Street, Suite 925
Boston, MA 02222
RE: TWin Cities Army Ammunition Plant
Mr. Rotondo,
the City of Arden Hills has engaged in discussions with representatives of the
Department of the Army and the General Services Administration concerning the futUre
of Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant (TCAAP), an inactive military industrial facility
within the City, It is our understanding that the Army wishes to dispose of the property
and that the General Services Administration is the property disposal agent. The City of
Arden Hills is interested in obtaining title to portions of TCAAP. More specifically, the
City would like to pursue title to the areas C. D, and E generally outlined on the attached
map. It is anticipated that Ramsey County would pursue areas A and B for parks and
open space. Portions of the property are contaminated and the Army will be responsible
for the remediation of the contamination.
.
The nonnal disposal process of contaminated federal property involves the satisfaction of
the provisions of Title 42, United States Code, section 9620(h)(3), which requires that the
United States provide a covenant to the transferee warranting that all action necessary for
the protection of human health and the environment has been taken prior to transfer.
However, if certain assurances and protections can be provided, as specified in section
9620(h)(3)(C) of the above cited statute, the United States is allowed to defer the
warranty and transfer title before remediation is completed. The deferral in this case
must be approved by the Governor of the State of Minnesota. Given the intended
development of TCAAP and the ability to incorporate remediation and site preparation
for development into one process, the deferral of the statutory covenant appears to be
appropriate. Further, the response action assurances required for deferral have been
considered and do not present an impediment to the City's intended plans.
On behalf of the City of Arden Hills, the City requests that the Army and the General .
Services Administration begin negotiations to develop an arrangement for the early
transfer of the property and for an environmental cooperative services agreement
City of Arden Hills . 1245 West Highway 96 . Arden Hills, MN . 55112-5794
Phone 651.634.5120 . Fax 651.634.5137 . www.ci.arden-hills_mn.us
.
.
.
Letter to Glenn Rotondo
- -
December 18,2002
Page 2 of2
whereby the City performs the remaining environmental remediation work, through the
City's developer, at the property. Further, the City requests that the Army prepare a
Finding of Suitability for Early Transfer, prepare and publish a public notice providing
for a comment period of not less than 30 days as required by statute and thereafter request
a deferral of the statutory covenant from the Governor. Weare available to discuss these
matters with you at your convenience. If you should have any questions, please feel free
to contact City Administrator Joe Lynch at 651-634-5127. Thank you for your time and
consideration.
Sincerely,
The City of Arden Hills
Dennis Probst
Mayor of Arden Hills
Beverly Aplikowski
Council Member
David Grant
Council Member
Gregg Larson
Council Member
Lois Rem
Council Member
Joe Lynch
City Administrator
cc:
Ralph Conner
Senior Advisor
U.S, General SerVices Administration
10 Causeway Street, Suite 925
Boston, MA 02222
Brian Polly
Assistant CoJ1imissioner
GSA Office of Property Disposal
1800 F Street NW
Washington, DC 20405
Joseph Whitaker
Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
lnstallations and Housing
Office, Assistant Secretary of the Army
110 Army Pentagon
Washington, DC 20310-0110
Bill T. Birney
Office of Assistant Secretary of the Army
(I&E)
Room 2E623 Pentagon
Washington, DC 20310
Exhibit A: Transfer Area Map
Vento Reuse Plan
~ Commercial t Off\CfIj tncluatrlal
--"""'"
--
- _""""""'"'__.
. -.-
- ....."'--
o R.".....oI
A - Ramsey County Parks Request
B - Ramsey County Wildlife Corridor
C - Main Excess Area
D . Officer's Quarters Area
E - Primer Tracer Ar_
F - National Guard License Area
~
N
Legend
~
~HIL
,...,.,...~...0I!y'",~-
~,---~
-....
.
.
.
DEC-12-2002 11:21
RAMSEY COUNTY PARKS
551 748 2508 P.02/03
:Yfinnc"Pta Dt'pdl"tlllcllt oJ' '\iatural Re\(IUrlL',
~,l" I .;; .
i~
'.1....,-.
'0' t"
., " . ~ .
The Honorable Dennis Probst
Arden Hills City Council
1245 West Highway 96
Arden Hills, MN, 55112
December 10. 2002
re: The 49 Jcre wildlife corridor and the amendment to the Rice Creek North Re,gional Trail
Master Plan
Dear Mayor Probst and City Council members,
As you know, The Department of Natural Resources suPPOrtS the amendment proposed by
Ramsey County to include the 49 acre wildlife corridor within the boundaries of the Rice Creek
North Regional Trail cortidor. We are very appreciative of the suPPOrt this proposal has received
(Q dme from both the Arden Hills Parks and Tr~ils Committee and the Planning Committee, We
look forward to the City's approval of the proposed amendment.
In the County's Proposed Amendmenr 10 the Rice Creek North Regional Trail Masur Plan
currently before the City Council. the 49 acre corridor is presented as tWO parcels referred to as
parcel C and parcel D. Parcel D is intended to depict that portion of the 49 acres which IS the
Army's site C contamination site. lt has been brought to our attention that there IS some
confusion surrounding the reasonS for separating the two parcels.
tn the text of the COUnty proposal (see second paragraph on page 2) it says the following. ."
"The area of contarr-'~ation (Parcel D) will be remediated by the U.S. Department of the Army In
accordance with the standards agreed upon by the Annt'and the Environmental Protection
Agency. Activities are underway to cleanup contaminants on lhs site." Indeed, Ramsey Coumy
and the DNR have been talking with the MN. Pollution Control Agency regarding the best way to
clean the site in order to assure that site C (Parcel D) can ultimately serve the functions of the
Wildlife corridor.
The intent of the County's tWO parcels approach is that the County would recei ve trJnsfer of
Parcel C ( the clean portion) through the National Park Services's Lands to Parks Progr~m early
in the land transfer process. Meanwhile Parcel D (site C) would be retained by thc I"cderal
government with the Army doing the cleanup until finished to Record of Decision ,tandjrds.
Once the cleanup is accomplished to meet. at a minimum, Record of Decision cntena. II t\ould
Ihen be transferred directly to the County.
DNR Infonn.tion: 651-296.6157
. I,B88-646-6367 . TIY: 651.296-5484 . 1.-'''''''- ")~')
An Equ.1..l OppDnunily Employer
who VOllues. Dlvc:nily
o
Printld on AlKyd.a P:u)er CO/l13IMII)"
Minimum Qr 10". Pos.t-Consumer Wa:oll)
'02 DEe 12AN10:53
DEC-12-2002 11:22
RAMSEY COUNTY PARKS
651 748 2508 P.OJ/OJ
Cleurly then. it would not fall to the City to clean site C. The land would end up wilh Ihe COUnty
cleaned to a slandard suitable for a wildlife and recreution corridor. thus fulfilling the vision of
Ihe Vento Plan for a connection between Rice Creek and the future regional park reserve.
In order thaI the federal government relain responsibi Iity to complete cleanup of site C. it is
necessary that the 49 acres not be included in Ihe lands deSIgnated fro Early Transfer ;\uthonly.
We nOle in the City's proposed lelter to OSA asking to initiate the Early Transfer Authority thai
such an exemption of the 49 acres has not been considered.
We are seeking your help in obtaining an exemplion of the 49 acre wildlife corridor from the
Early Transfer Authority so that the cleanup can be accomplished by the Army to their credit in
lhe public inlerest of establishing Ihe wildlife corridor. It would be most effective if such a
request is included by the City of Arden Hills in their Ie Iter to OSA.
Thank you for your considerl1tion of this approach. Please let me know how we might continue
10 cooperate to achIeve the Vento Plan vision for TCAAP.
Sincerely,
~ / Ctftttc-L-
Kathleen A. Wallace
Regional Director
cc: Congresswoman tlclty McCollum
Greg Mack, Ramsey County Parks and Recreation r.~partment
TOTAL P.OJ
.
.
.
.
<
.
.
.
~
~
EN HILLS
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
Agenda Item 6.C
December 11,2002
TO:
Mayor and City Council
Joe Lynch, City Administrator
Peter Hellegers, City Planner ~
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Planning Case #02-28, Dean and Suzanne Volkert; Variance
1330 Nursery Hill Lane
ENCLOSURES:
I. December 4, 2002 Planning Commission Memo with attachments
2. Planning Commission Meeting Minute excerpt
3. November 8, 2002 Letter from Staff to the applicant extending the
review period from 60 to 120 days.
4. "Additional Site Analysis for a Garden Shed" submitted by the
applicant for the December 4, 2002 Planning Commission Meeting.
Request
The applicant is requesting a variance to allow a garden shed to remain in the Side Yard Corner
Setback area.
Planninl! Commission Recommendation
The Planning Commission is recommending approval of Planning Case #02-28, Dean and
Suzanne Volkert, 1330 Nursery Hill Lane, request for a variance of ten (10) feet from the Side
Yard Corner setback (location is shown as New Loc. A on the "Additional Site Analysis for a
Garden Shed") be approved subject to the following conditions:
L
The evergreens along the west property line must be maintained to ensure that the
shed is not highly visible from Hamline Avenue.
The trees to the north of the shed must be maintained to ensure that the shed is less
visible from Nursery Hill Lane.
2.
Page 2 of2
December II, 2002
Planning Case #02-28
Deadline for Al!encv Actions
The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on October 9,2002.
Pursuant to Minnesota State Statue, the city must act on this request by December 8. 2002 (60
days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60 day review
period. The city may with the petitioner's consent extend the review period beyond the 120
days.
On November 8, 2002 City Staff informed the applicant in writing that an additional 60 day
review period would be necessary. Extension of the review period to 120 days allows the City
until Februarv 6. 2003 to act on this request. This extension establishes the maximum amount of
time that the City can take to review the request without requesting an additional extension from
the applicant.
Options
l.
2.
3.
Recommend approval as submitted.
Recommend approval with conditions.
Recommend denial. If the City denies the petitioners request, "...it must state in writing
the reasons for the denial at the time that it denies the request".
Table for additional information.
4.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
~
~HILLS
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
November 22, 2002
PC Agenda Item 4.A
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Peter Hellegers, City Planner
SUBJECT: Case #02-28
Dean & Suzanne Volkert
1330 Nursery Hill Lane
Variance (Zoning Ordinance)
Request
The applicant is requesting a variance to allow a garden shed to remain in the Side Yard
Comer Setback area.
Site Plan Review
1. Setbacks - Does not meet setback requirement.
The setback requirement for comer lots in residential districts is 40 feet from the property
lines which abut a street. The setback requirement for rear yard accessory buildings in all
districts is 10 feet from the rear property line. The accessory shed is currently placed in
the southwest comer of the lot, along the property line that abuts Hamline Avenue. The
new proposed location would move the shed farther to the north and east and would be
much closer to the house. This location would still require a variance but it would be a
much smaller variance than previously requested.
Accessory Buildings
:;:jtl!~{~f
Side Yard Comer
Setback
Rear Setback
(accessory)
40'
10'
10'
Memo to Planning Commission
Planning Case #02-28
Page 2 of6
.
Variance Criteria
The applicants recently erected a garden shed in the southwest corner of their lot. A
resident alerted the Code Enforcement Officer that the shed may not have been in
conformance with the City Zoning Ordinance. The applicant was then notified of the
shed's non-conforming status in a letter from the Code Enforcement Officer dated
October 2, 2002. After consultation with staff, the applicant submitted the
aforementioned request for a 40-foot variance to the Side Yard Comer Setback area and a
6-foot variance from the Rear Yard (accessory) Setback area.
At the Planning Commission meeting on November 6th, the Commission tabled the
applicant's request for additional information. Since that time the applicant has been
reviewing alternate locations on the property in efforts to submit a diagram or analysis
which depicts potential locations and their merits. Staff has also reviewed the property
and believes that the newly proposed location would be a better site for the shed. At the
newly proposed location the Side Yard Comer setback would be 30 feet (a variance of 10
feet) and the Rear Yard (accessory) Setback area would exceed the requirement 10 feet.
Although the new proposed location would still require a variance, the amount of a
variance would be greatly reduced from the previous request and the negative impacts
would be minimized. The shed would be far less noticeable from the South and should
not interfere with the visibility from the neighbor to the south's driveway, The shed
would be more than 25 feet east of the row of evergreen trees at the thickest part oftheir .
cover. The shed would be less visible from the north at Nursery Hill Lane because it
would be shielded from view by the house and an evergreen which sit north of it. Third,
the shed would not be located on or near the drainage and utility easement. One negative
impact may be that it could worsen flooding problems in the southwest corner of the
lower level of the applicant's home. The applicant has stated that there is already a
problem of water seeping into the house in this area and thinks that a shed in this location
could worsen this situation. The applicant stated that this was one of his initial reasons
for locating the shed in the southwest comer of the property and not at the newly
proposed location. The applicant and staff have discussed potential methods for
mitigating problems of excess water entering the lower level ofthe applicant's house.
A. State Requirements
Minnesota State Statue in Chapter 462.357, Subdivision 6, (2), defines "undue
hardship" as:
"... means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under
conditions allowed by the official controls, the plight of the landowner is due to
circumstance unique to the property not created by the landowner, and the variance, if
granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations
alone shall not constitute an undue hardship ifreasanable use of the property exists
under the terms afthe ordinance..."
.
.
.
.
Memo to Planning Commission
Planning Case #02-28
Pagc 3 of6
B. City Requirements
Section VIII, D, 4, c and d, of the City's Zoning Ordinance state that,
"Adherence to the provisions of this ordinance is required, except for special cases which
arise because of the configuration of a particular parcel. The condition shall not have
been created by the landowner. A variance or variances may be granted from specific
provisions of this ordinance because such land factors as length of a side of a lot, the
shape of the lot or the unusual terrain prohibit reasonable development equivalent to that
which would be permitted without variance on a similar size lot located in the same
district. but which lot has no unusual configuration. Economic conditions alone shall not
be grounds for a variance. In no case shall the granting of a variance impair the health,
safety, comfort and general welfare of the public, nor will it be contrary to the intent and
purpose of the Comprehensive Plan, the official map or this or any other ordinance of the
City. "
Variance Findings
Minnesota State Stature 462.357, subd. 6, requires that cities consider the following five
matters when hearing requests for zoning ordinance variances.
L
Are the circumstances for which the variance is requested unique to the
property?
Yes. The combination of the Side Yard Corner Setback area, grading of the
property, and the unique orientation of the building create a situation where the
applicant does not have a viable site for an accessory building. There is one other
location on the lot which appears to have enough space for a shed, however, this
location would not work because the area is lower than most of the surrounding
property and experiences some ponding after precipitation. Also, the terrain in
the southeast comer is slightly contoured and mushy which would not be a good
place to locate a shed.
2.
Would granting the variance be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the
City's Zoning Ordinance?
Yes. The Zoning Ordinance was intended to create reasonable restrictions on
properties in the City. When these regulations are fashioned typically they
envisioned uniform rectangular lots with houses lined up in a row. However,
since the Zoning Ordinance does uot consider unusual orientation of buildings
and water drainage issues on properties, it is not always reasonable to enforce the
Zoning Ordinance to its full extent. Enforcing the zoning ordinance to its full
extent would mean that the applicant could only place a shed in those areas inside
of the required setbacks. Since this leaves a small portion ofthe rear and side
Memo to Planning Commission
Planning Case #02-28
Page 4 of6
yards which are either too close to the building (per the Building Code) or low
lying areas (which tend to accumulate water/ponding) the applicant could not
place a shed on their property. Due to the unique issues on the applicant's
property, granting a variance from the zoning restrictions would be consistent
with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Ordinance while still being flexible
enough to meet the needs of City residents.
3. Could the property in question be put to a reasouable use without the
granting of the variance?
No. On corner lots in the R-I zoning district, accessory sheds are permitted uses.
Accessory sheds are subject to the setback requirements outlined in Section 5 of
the Zoning Ordinance. Therefore, a shed can be located a corner lot with a
standard configuration in the same R-I zoning district as the applicant's property.
However, the applicant's property is an unusual configuration in which the house
faces the northwest corner of the property (the attached garage faces Nursery Hill
Lane), so the rear yard area is a much smaller triangnlar piece. Furthermore, the
sloping of the property at its southern border drains water from the west to east
and creates areas ofponding in the southeast quadrant of the applicant's rear yard.
The Arden Hills Zoning Ordinance states in section VIII, D, 4, c and d:
"A variance or variances mav be granted from specific provisions of this
ordinance because such land factors as the length of a side of a lot, the shape
of the lot or the unusual terrain prohibit reasonable development
equivalent to that which would be permitted without variance on a
similar size lot located in the same district, but which lot has no unusual
confil!:uration."
If the applicant's property did not have the unusual terrain (sloping and ponding
in the rear yard) or the unusual orientation of the house (which creates a small
triangular rear yard) then the applicant would have been able to construct a shed
on their property just as any other corner lot in the R- I district. However, due to
the unusual confignration ofthe lot and the drainage and ponding issues, there is
no suitable place that the shed could be located on this property and meet both the
Building Code requirement (for separation from the main structure), and the
required setbacks outlined in the Zoning Ordinance.
In this light, staff suggests that when considering whether the property could be
put to a reasonable use, that "reasonable use" be viewed by what would be
considered reasonable on any other corner lot in the R-I district. There are
unusual circumstances on the applicant's property which preclude the applicant
from locating a shed anywhere on this property without receiving a variance.
This seems to indicate that the property does experience a hardship and that the
.
.
.
.
.
.
Memo to Planning Commission
Planning Case #02-28
Page5of6
applicant, or any future owner of this property, would require a variance in order
to place a shed in a suitable location. Therefore, staff has determined that the
property cannot be put to a "reasonable use" in that without the variance the
applicant would be prohibited from reasonable development equivalent to what
would be permitted on a similar size lot in the same district but without the
unusual configuration.
4. Was the hardship created by the owner?
No. The hardship in this case is that due to the unusual circumstances; the house
oriented at an angle on the lot, the ponding in the rear yard, and the Streetside
Side Yard setback requirements; the applicant would not be able to locate a shed
on their property without a variance.
The house is sited at an angle toward the southwest comer of the property and the
low level of the rear yard of this property which creates ponding after
precipitation. The house was not sited in its current location by the applicant but
by a previous owner. Water has always run along the southern edge of this
property and it used to then flow eastward along the southern edge of neighboring
properties. However, one of the neighboring property owners hauled in fill to
raise the level of their property and eliminate some water drainage on their
property. Unfortunately, this caused a worsened situation ofponding water in the
rear yard of the applicant. Due to these circumstances the applicant would be
unable to locate a shed in the rear yard and the southeast quadrant of the property.
If the applicant were to try and locate a shed in the southwest quadrant of the
property they would be unable to do so because most of this area is within the
Streetside Side Yard Setback area. The portion that is not within the Streetside
Side Yard Setback area is too small to contain the 12 x 8 shed.
5.
Would granting the variance alter the essential character of the
neighborhood?
No. The row of evergreen trees would conceal the shed from view along Hamline
A venue from the West, and a few more trees and the house would shield the shed
from view from the North. The shed will still be noticeable from the property to
the south but not as visible from the south along Hamline A venue. Lastly the
house would shield the shed from view from the East so the property owners to
the east should not be impacted either. Furthermore, sheds are permitted
accessory structures and commonplace in R-I and R-2 zoning districts throughout
Arden Hills.
Memo to Planning Commission
Planning Case #02-28
Page 6 of6
.
Deadline for A!!ency Actions
The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on October 9,
2002. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statue, the city must act on this request by December
8,2002 (60 days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an
additional 60 day review period. The city may with the petitioner's consent extend the
review period beyond the 120 days.
Options
I. Recommend approval as submitted.
2. Recommend approval with conditions.
3. Recommend denial. lfthe City denies the petitioner's request, "... it must
state in writing the reasons for the denial at the time that it denies the request".
4. Table for additional information.
Recommendation
In Planning Case #02-28, based on the aforementioned findings staff recommends that
the request for a variance of ten (10) feet from the Side Yard Corner setback be approved
subject to the following conditions:
.
I. The evergreens along the west property line must be maintained to ensure that
the shed is not highly visible from Hamline Avenue.
2. The trees to the north of the shed must be maintained to ensure that the shed is
less visible from Nursery Hill Lane.
Attachments
I. Copy of the October 28,2002 Memo to Planning Commission (with
attachments)
2. Location Map.
.
explanation of project and need for variance
Dean & Sue Volkert
1330 Nursery Hill Lane
Arden Hills, MN 55112
(651) 631-2354
Our house is located on a corner lot, on the south side of Nursery Hill Lane, and borders Hamline Avenue to
the west. We would like to make use of a Garden Shed that I had built, and placed in the SW corner of our
lot, not realizing that front yard setbacks apply to the side yard of a comer lot. We feel that we have no
reasonable alternative location for our Garden Shed due to the following unique circumstances,
.
W
>
<::
.~~
CD
--.Jo
::2
<::
I
NURSERY HILL LANE
.131.58'
..
io
...
24"
24
LOT I
!! co
...
2 CAR
.
v
n
(D
o
24"
o.
o
131.50'
}J~ ftu~ Loc..h'on (W)
~
, I Q.S Ivy p\i
_\~~
.
~
~HILLS
MEMORANDUM
DATE: October 28,2002
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Peter Hellegers, City Planner
SUBJECT: Case #02-28
Dean & Suzanne Volkert
1330 Nursery Hill Lane
Variance (Zoning Ordinance)
ReQuest
The applicant is requesting a variance to allow a garden shed to remain in the Side Yard
Comer Setback and Rear Yard (accessory) Setback areas.
Overview
Surrounding Area
.
.
North
Low Density Residential R-I: Single Family Residential
South
Low Density Residential R-I: Single Family Residential
East
Low Density Residential R-I:
West
Medium Density Residential
Site Data
Futl're Land Use
Exislil\g Land Use:
:bllliJ)g:
. Lot Size:
Topography:
Low Density Residential
Single Family Detached Residential
R-l: Single Family Residential
0.324 acres (approximately 14,058 square feet)
Rear yard slopes to South and East
Single Family Detached
Residential
Single Family Detached
Residential
Single Family Detached
Residential
Single Family Attached
Residential
.
.
.
Memo to Planning Commission
Planning Case #02-28
Page 2 of5
Site Plan Review
1. Setbacks - Does not meet setback requirement.
The setback requirement for comer lots in residential districts is 40 feet from the property
lines which abut a street. The setback requirement for rear yard accessory buildings in all
districts is 10 feet from the rear property line. The accessory shed is currently placed in
the southwest comer of the lot, along the property line that abuts Hamline Avenue.
40'
0'
(approximately 14' from
Hamline Avenue)
6'
Rear Setback
10'
2. Lot Coverage - Exceeds Code Requirement.
The requirement for all residential districts is a maximum of 25%. The square feet of the
house and shed at 1330 Nursery Hill Lane constitute lot coverage of 10%.
3. Landscape Lot Area - Exceeds Code Requirement.
The requirement for all residential districts is a Minimum Landscape Lot Area of 65%.
The addition of the shed at 1330 Nursery Hill Lane would leave approximately 85% of
the lot as landscape area.
4. Traffic Visibility - Not Applicable.
The Traffic Visibility requirements in the Arden Hills Zoning Ordinance are:
On a corner lot, nothing shall be placed or allowed to grow in such a manner as
to impede vision between a height of a two and one-half (2 !6) and ten (10) feet
above the center line grades of the intersectinl!: streets within fifieen (15) feet of
the intersecting street rights-ol-way. (Section 6C, 2(c)).
There may have been some concern about visibility from the neighboring driveway
which is south ofthe shed. However, the shed as currently cited is farther east than the
row of evergreen trees which run uorth along the applicant's west property line.
Memo to Planning Commission
Planning Case #02-28
Page 3 of5
.
Variance Criteria
The applicants recently erected a garden shed in the southwest corner of their lot. A
resident alerted the Code Enforcement Officer that the shed may not have been in
conformance with the City Zoning Ordinance. The applicant was then notified of the
shed's non-conforming status in a letter from the Code Enforcement Officer dated
October 2, 2002. After consultation with staff, the applicant submitted the
aforementioned request for a 40-foot variance to the Side Yard Corner Setback area and a
4-foot variance to the Rear Yard (accessory) Setback.
A. State Requirements
Minnesota State Statue in Chapter 462.357, Subdivision 6, (2), defines "undue
hardship" as:
". .. means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under
conditions allowed by the official controls, the plight of the landowner is due to
circumstance unique to the property not created by the landowner, and the variance, if
granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations
alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use of the property exists under
the terms of the ordinance. . . "
.
B. City Requirements
Section VIII, D, 4, c and d, of the City's Zoning Ordinance state that,
"Adherence to the provisions of this ordinance is required, except for special cases which
arise because of the configuration of a particular parcel. The condition shall not have
been created by the landowner. A variance or variances of a side of a lot, the shape of the
lot or the unusual terrain prohibit reasonable development equivalent to that which would
be pennitted without variance on a similar size lot located in the same district, but which
lot has no unusual configuration. Economic conditions alone shall not be grounds for a
variance. In no case shall the granting of a variance impair the health, safety, comfort
and general welfare of the public, nor will it be contrary to thc intent and purpose of the
Comprehensive Plan, the official map or this or any other ordinance of the City."
Variance Findinl!.s
Minnesota State Stature 462.357, subd. 6, requires that Cities consider the following five
matters when hearing requests for zoning ordinance variances.
1. Are the circumstances for which the variance is requested unique to the
property?
.
.
.
.
Memo to Planning Commission
Planning Case #02-28
Page 4 of5
Yes. The combination ofthe Side Yard Corner Setback area, grading of the
property, and the unique orientation of the building create a situation where the
applicant does not have a viable site for an accessory building. There are two
other locations on the Jot which appear suitable for a shed; however, those
locations would not work because they are lower lying areas which tend to
accumulate water.
2. Would granting the variance be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the
City's Zoning Ordinance?
Yes. The Zoning Ordinance was intended to create reasonable restrictions on
properties in the City. However, since the Zoning Ordinance does not consider
unusual orientation of buildings and water drainage issues on properties, it is not
always reasonable to enforce the Zoning Ordinance to its full extent. Due to the
unique issues on this property, granting a variance from the zoning restrictions
would be consistent with the spirit and intent ofthe Zoning Ordinance while still
being flexible enough to meet the needs of City residents.
3.
Could the property in question be put to a reasonable use without the
granting of the variance?
No. The property could be used as a single family residence with a garage but
with no other accessory buildings. However, accessory sheds are permitted as
accessory uses for all properties in the R-l and R-l zoning districts. If a variance
were not granted then this property would not be allowed to have an accessory use
which is commonplace in Arden Hills. Furthermore, the Arden Hills Zoning
Ordinance states in section VIII, D, 4, c and d:
"A variance or variances of a side of a lot, the shape of the lot or the unusual
terrain prohibit reasonable development equivalent to that which would be
permitted without variance on a similar size lot located in the same district,
but which lot has no unusual configuration."
Basically, if the applicant's property were not oriented at the awkward angle and
did not have the drainage issues, then the applicant would be able to construct a
shed on their property since a shed could be sited on most ofthe properties in the
surrounding area.
4.
Was the hardship created by the owner?
No. The hardship was created by the original builder/owner ofthe house and the
neighboring property to the west, which eliminated other possible locations for an
accessory shed.
Memo to Planning Commission
Planning Case #02-28
Page 5 of5
5. Would granting the variance alter the essential character of the
neighborhood?
No. The row of evergreen trees virtually conceals the shed from view along
Hamline Avenue. The applicant has stated that some neighboring property
owners have believe the shed is a benefit in that it blocks the sight lines from their
rear yards to Hamline Avenue.
6. Is the variance requested the minimum variance necessary?
Yes. While the Side Yard Comer variance is for 40 feet and the Rear Yard
(accessory) variance is for 4 feet, the location of the shed is the only reasonable
place for a shed on this property.
Deadline for Al!encv Actions
The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on October 9,
2002. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statue, the city must act on this request by December
8,2002 (60 days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an
additional 60 day review period. The city may with the petitioner's consent extend the
review period beyond the 120 days.
Options
1. Recommend approval as submitted.
2. Recommend approval with conditions.
3. Recommend denial. lfthe City denies the petitioner's request, "... it must
state in writing the reasons for the denial at the time that it denies the request".
4. Table for additional information.
Recommendation
In Planning Case #02-28, staff recommends that the variance request of forty (40) feet for
the Side Yard Comer setback and four (4) feet for the Rear Yard (accessory) setback be
approved.
Attachments
1.
2.
3.
4.
Applicant's statement (with photographs of the site).
Zoning of Properties within 350 feet.
Land Use of Properties within 350 feet.
Location Map.
.
.
.
----
explanation of project and need for variance
Dean & Sue Volkert
1330 Nursery Hill Lane
Arden Hills, MN 55112
(651) 631-2354
Our house is located on a comer lot, on the south side of Nursery Hill Lane, and border:s Hamline Avenue to
the west. We would like to make use of a Garden Shed that I had built, and placed in the SW comer of our
lot, not realizing that front yard setbacks apply to the side yard of a COQ1er lot. We feel that we have no
reasonable alternative location for our Garden Shed due to the following unique circumstances.
NURSERY HILL LANE
131.58'
!'
...
.
w
>
<:
2~"
2~
LOT t
!e 0'
...
2 c.\R
'.
V
24" n
(0
.0
1-
ewl'
Z. ""
. (0
-l0
L
<:
I
o.
OR. a: UT. ESIH.
o
-
131.50'
.
.
.
1, The backyard is 100 small to place the shed. The house is situated at an angle and set quite far back from
Nursery Hill Lane, making the back yard quite small. We have a 3-season porch and a deck on the south
side of the house that is not shown in the sketch (on first page) but is placed at the SE corner of the garage
and continues south into the backyard 16 feet.
.
2. Water drainage on the south property line makes it a bad location for a structure, especially considering
how close the house is to the property line.
.
.
.
3. The neighbors to the east built up their property in their backyard so that water pools on the SE comer of
our lot and gets many inchcs dcep before it is high enough to get over the crest that they created with their
improvements, This area is undcr water every spring and any time we get substantial rain in the summer,
therefore making the SE comer impractical. This picture was taken after the small amount of rain that fell
last week. A much larger area is under water in the spring,
.
o' -':A"'.J"#,',"'iF'
'~--'" .. ",.'-
"",
~.......
4. The west side of the house does not allow for the 40' setback. Even if the shed were to be placed at the
minimum 6' from the house, there is not enough room. Also, I already have a drainage problem on the west
side of the house, which results in water in my basement after hard soaking rains. If positioned there, the
roof of the shed would drop water right into the problem area.
.
.
.
We feel that positioning the shed in the SW corner of the lot upholds the spirit and intent of the City's
Zoning Code. It is the best position for avoiding drainage areas. It is cosmetically the most pleasing
location. As noted by one of our next-door neighbors, "It helps shield Hamline". Because of the existing
row of evergreens, an electric pole, and the neighbor's large trees, it has no negative visual impact as viewed
from Hamline Avenue.
.
.
"
Visibility and line of site are not affected from the south neighbor's driveway since the row of evergreens is
closer to Hamline Avenue.
.
.
.
We see no practical alternate location for our Garden Shed on our property. We believe that the architectural
character of the shed is enhancing for the property. It is not yet painted and has no landscaping around it due
to it just being erected and finding out that we were not within the setback code.
Please consider our request for a variance. Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter.
.
VARIANCE REQUREST FOR 1330 NURSERY HILL LANE NOV. 2002
ZONING OF PROPERTIES WTHIN 350 FEET
l~'0-J--<r- ~~r
~@ ~~ ~@ -11 Jil~
6 ) ~/A\'
00 'fb fj ~ Iii1 @ \ . l0
. \
/" \
~- fIJ R-1 /1 /.
~~o} R-' '-
R-1 '" )3;-1
!Jr lIl1J mn ~ I /fill "" R-1 R-1 R- \1 //
R-1 ./ i'kIr.;;en, Hili lane
f!) \Jill!llz; V - m~' R ./
m R-1 R_1R-1R1 ~
r '\. \\~) R-1
~UiIJtf ~.. ~ ,: \
R-1 R-1 ~,1IJR-1
:; ~ R-3 \ I~ ) i'kIr.;;....... HiD Court
R-1 /'/W-1 \
~~& 0 rn]1~ t-..
L
?t: [[[r; .~, ~. ,l,iJif R-1
~~~ \1 'Jill
i~ - L5- g
~@<Zz; \~t~ % @/ .~
0;) ~ / R3oe(
, . ,<({), ~!
~ \" ";/ ~ == ~
fjj [[] \YA ~ '0> E
~ '0, ffiIJ '\::;y' ~ ~ ~
~, ~ ~~
2\\\' v DID Dill"'.:;: y' . './.-A \
\~> ~ y(? .. f \ \ /
[ill] ill\ID ~. (\\:i> \ '
\ ~ '\
~ \)-' ,/ \
\
...
I i-l \
\ //)\ \
\ \
"
ZONING SYMBOL
R-1'=' SINGLE FAMILYRESIDENTlAL
R.3"" TOW NH OUSE & LOW DENSITY MUL TIP LE H 0 U SIN 0:;
~
N
200 0 200 400 GOO 800 Feet
I""'W...._ '
ltI_tO"'2
VARIANCE REQUREST FOR 1330 NURSERY HILL LANE NOV. 2002
LAND USE OF PROPERTIES WITHIN 350 FEET
\ ~ .'~~J'r-
~-~ \ \. ... /
g@ ~~/W3B. -4 ~/l \ / 7 '.,""~
y::Jl~ 1/ / /~
/ \\-~// 1/1
00~ fj @/fj tj /\\ 'y I
/ \~W
)'. am [ill ~ fIJ !lJ v-r ~
SFD ~FQ/'-., , .
"'. ~/, / ,
SFD X'SFD
n mn ill ill t: SFD ;FC ~D' /'/
rn [[llJ ITill FA
~r~ .,./
~ \Jill!llz; v--. m iiI". R SFD i'kIr.;;en, Hill lane Y
,/ " /
~[ \. /
"l1~ISFDFD ~ ~ '\
fl1J; JL\ \ V / SFD SFD FD FD \/' '\
& ~ (jJ. SFA \
::;FD j i'kIr.;;-- Hili Court
{lJj/S0 fjj 0 Urn ~ I SFD SF FD
SFD '--
~~~ ~ :;\, '\fUllfil I ~
~~<Zz; 0% % @/ ~
!l!;} __ \ ,~\ .~~ ~ ~ -
~ m~ " ~v e
~!::0 <y ffiIJ~ ~ v , ~ \
~. DID lliDW:~,\(~) ~ \
1\ \. \
[ill] ill\ID 0,~ . ,'\<\ \ \ ,~
\): ,\~) \ y//\\
/' \
\ - / \ 'I
...
I -\ \ /. /\ \
\\
LAND USE SYMBOL
SFD "" SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED R ESID EN TIAL
SFA= SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED RESIDENTIAL
.
.
11 .
200 0 200 400 GOO 800 Feet
~...,,-' ,
tG_1tl-4l:l
N
. ~ ~
(l)
(l) (\J
LL ::J
0
0 >-
0 (l)
0 2:
~
::J
(j)
-
0
~
0
Z
0 Q.
0 (\J
l,() 2:
(I)
~
0
Z
.
.
c
o
*- a..
'B'"
o:!
--I
o
o
o
l,()
~
z
1/1
:s
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - DECEMBER 4, 2002
6
noted there would be roughly one instructor per 25 students. He stated there would also .
be one administrator and one administrative assistant.
Commissioner Zimmerman inquired about lunch preparation. Mr. Glasow stated they
had a kitchen on-site where the food would be prepared.
Chair Sand indicated they would have enough parking spaces, even if everyone drove.
He noted the real issue was traffic issues.
Commissioner Ricke asked what the proposed start and ending times were. She noted
concern about the traffic in that area, but it might make a difference depending on how
times were staggered. Mr. Glasow replied they anticipated their start time would be
closer to their elementary start time, which was at 8:50 a.m. He noted this would not
conflict with the other schools in the area.
Francis Podlasek, 4410 North Snelling Avenue, stated North Heights had been a good
neighbor, but he had concerns about the traffic going south on Snelling Avenue. He
asked for assurances that the students would not use Snelling Avenue.
Mr. Glasow stated the commuting part would be to campus and home again with
commnting between Bethel and North Heights by bus. The students would not be driving
between the two campuses. He assured the Commission the buses would go down
Highway 96 and not down North Snelling.
Chair Sand closed the public hearing at 8:22 p.m,
.
Commissioner Zimmerman moved, seconded by Commissioner Bezdicek, to approve
Planning Case #02-34, North Heights Church, Special Use Permit, subject to the
following conditions and recommendations:
I. The main parking lot access drive for the high school use shall be from
Highway 96 and North Heights Church shall direct as much traffic to the
Highway 96 access drive as possible.
The motion carried unanimously (5-0),
UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS
A. PLANNING CASE #02-28 - DEAN & SUZANNE VOLKERT, 1330 NURSERY
HILL LANE, VARIANCE
Staff stated applicant was requesting a variance a garden shed to remain in the Side Yard
Corner Setback area. He noted the garden shed would be moved to the northeast, which
was different location than the original location in the southwest comer of the lot. He
noted the proposed location was the only other option applicant had for the placement of
the shed.
.
Chair Sand asked which location were they being asked to approve, location A or
location B. Mr. Hellegers replied they were being asked to approve location A.
.
.
.
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - DECEMBER 4, 2002
7
Commissioner Zimmerman noted the applicant's preference was location B. Mr.
Hellegers replied staff was recommending location A because it was a better location.
Commissioner Ricke asked who added the three-season porch to the house. Dean
Volkert, applicant, replied the porch and deck were added by previous owners.
Commissioner Ricke asked if there was a storage area under the deck. Mr. Volkert
replied there was.
Commissioner Ricke asked who added the swing set. Mr. Volkert replied he added the
play area, but the neighbor added the drainage, ponding problem on his lot. He stated he
added location B because Commissioner Smithknecht asked at the last meeting if he
could move the shed north. He noted he could move the shed to location A if they
wanted and he was okay with that location. He noted location A was the flattest portion
of his lot and it would be less work to move the shed to that area,
Commissioner Bezdicek moved, seconded by Commissioner Zimmerman, to recommend
to Council to approve Planning Case #02-28, Dean & Suzanne Volkert, 1330 Nursery
Hill Lane Variance subject to the following conditions and recommendations:
1.
The evergreens along the west property line must be maintained to ensure that the
shed is not highly visible from Hamline Avenue.
The trees to the north of the shed must be maintained to ensure that the shed is
less visible from Nursery Hill Lane,
2.
The motion carried unanimously (4-1 )(Commissioner Ricke)
B. HIGHWAY 96 RECONSTRUCTION DISCUSSION
Mr. Parrish presented the draft landscape plan and Highway 96 Taskforce Documents for
the Commissioners' comments,
Commissioner Ricke stated her concern was the trail connection crossing over Highway
96. Mr. Parrish replied the regional trail connection would stop at Highway 10 around
North Heights and would not proceed until that area was reconstructed,
Commissioner Ricke noted she still had a concern about residents, particularly children,
crossing Highway 96.
Commissioner Zimmerman noted if they were going to landscape the median, they
needed to maintain it. He noted they needed to irrigate the landscaping, or at least make
sure it was regularly watered
Chair Sand noted Arden Hills had more median than the surrounding cities and stated
they had to take advantage of the median by planting as many trees as possible, plant sod,
and irrigating it. He stated the median needed to be very aesthetically pleasing and
needed to be maintained.
.
November 8, 2002
Mr. Dean Volkert
Ms. Suzanne Volkert
1330 Nursery Hill Lane
Arden Hills, MN 55112
RE: Extension of Review Period from 60 davs to 120 davs
Planning Case #02-28
Variance
Dear Mr. and Mrs, Volkert:
Please be advised that the Planning Commission has tabled your requests for 40 foot side
yard corner (accessory) and 4 foot rear yard (accessory) variances for additional
information. Additional information should include an analysis of all possible locations
that a garden shed could be placed on the property and why the variances are necessary if
there are alternate locations. Other items to include for the requested additional .
information should be a more specific explanation of the hardship necessitating that the
shed be placed in the proposed location, and also what are the unique characteristics of
your property which cause the need for a variance.
The Planning Commission will review your application (with the additional information)
at their next meeting on Wednesday, December 4, 2002 at 7:00 p.rn, in the City of
Arden Hills Council Chambers, 1245 Highway 96. Please be present at this meeting to
answer any questions that the Commissioners may have. In addition, if the Planning
Commission makes a recommendation regarding this proposal it would be heard by the
City Council at their Special Meeting on December 16,2002.
The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on October 9,
2002. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statue, the City must act on this request by December
8,2002 (60 days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an
additional 60 day review period, The city may with the petitioner's consent extend the
rcview period beyond the 120 days.
Please note that because this case was tabled for additional information it will be
necessarv to extend the review period from 60 davs to 120 davs so that this case may be
heard by the Council at their Special Meeting on December 16, 2002 while remaining
compliant with Minnesota State Statue.
The following reasons necessitate extension of the review period from 60 days to 120
days:
.
.
.
.
I. Provide the applicant with an opportunity to bring forth the additional
information requested by the Planning Commission.
2. Without an extension of the review period the case could not proceed through
the necessary meetings to have a decision on the application before the 60 day
deadline. The next Planning Commission meeting is scheduled for December
4, 2002 and the first City Council meeting following that date is scheduled for
December 9, 2002.
Please note that an extension of the review period does not mean that the case will
necessarily take 120 days to reach a decision, however it does establish the maximum
amount of time the City has to review the case without seeking the applicant's approval
to extend beyond the 120 days. If you have any qnestions, do not hesitate to contact me
at (651) 634-5 I 34. Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
Ik~
Peter Rellegers
City Planner
cc: Planning Case File 02-28
Additional site analysis for a Garden Shed
Dean & Sue Volkert
1330 Nursery Hill Lane
Arden Hills, MN 55112 .
(651) 631-2354
NURSERY HILL LANE
131.58'
..
$' in
'"
~ 24';:l
W ~ 24
> * LOT I ~ "'
-< ~ '"
* 2 CA.R -
W I"- """
I"- ~ n
Z (!)
-
....J 0 .~
L * I STORY
<C ~ F~t.tE
I *
e
Response to issues brought up at the November meeting.
la. Reasonable use: Pete has documented his interpretation of "reasonable use" very well in his memo to
the planning commission. He points out that it's meaning has to do with comparing what is permitted on
similar size corner lots located in the same district. Sheds are permitted and commonplace in R-l and R-2
zoning throughout Arden Hills and you can see from the sketch above that usable space is limited on this
property.
I b. A different kind of reasonable use: I feel the need to express my original reason for wanting a garden
shed. I have three young children and they have roller blades, bikes and numerous other gear in our garage.
I want to get the garden tools, fertilizers, spreader, pesticides, etc, out of the garage since my children
commonly play there, or prepare for play there, by sitting on the garage floor putting on kneepads, roller
blades or other gear.
2. The utility right of way: You can see from the sketch above that both new location possibilities have
addressed this issue.
3. A lesser variance: "New Location A" provides an alternative, which would result in a lesser variance,
even though my wife and I believe the shed would look best in the corncr of the lot (New Location B). .
,~'
.I,
~
~
EN HILLS
.
.
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
December 12, 2002
Agenda Item 6.D
TO:
Mayor and City Council
Joe Lynch, City Administrator
Peter Bellegers, City PlannerW
Planning Case #02-32, Tramm Builders & Realtors; (ArdenRidge) Master
and Final Plan PUD, County E-2 and Cleveland Avenue.
FROM:
SUBJECT:
.
ENCLOSURES:
1, November 26, 2002 Planning Commission Memo with attachments
2. PlaIlning Commission Meeting Minute excerpt
3. Rendering of the building submitted by the applicant
Request
The applicant is requesting Master and Final Planned Unit Development approval to construct a
six unit office condo building at the corner of County Road E-2 and Cleveland Avenue.
Planninl! Commission Recommendation
The Planning Commission is recommending approval of Planning Case #02-32, Tramm Builders
and Realtors, County E-2 and Cleveland Avenue, Master and Final Planned Unit Development
with the following conditions:
1.
2.
3.
. 4.
5.
A revised landscaping plan shall be submitted to the City Planner for his approval.
The applicant shall submit a landscape performance bond or other surety for 125% of the
cost of materials and installation valid one full year from the date of installation.
All necessary building permits shall be filed with the City Building Official.
All fire prevention systems shall be approved by the Fire Inspector.
Lighting shall be ornamental style lighting and shall be submitted to the City Planner for
his approval.
-r~
,I.
Page 2 on
December 12, 2002
Planning Case #02-32
.
6. A final utility plan shaH be submitted to the City Engineer for his approval.
7. Any new sanitary sewer line that connects to the line at the southwest comer of the site
be located three (3) feet above the existing line and then dropped in to reach the existing
line.
8. A final grading and drainage plan be submitted to the City Engineer for his approval.
9. A detail storm water management plan shall be submitted to the City Engineer for his
approval.
10. A masonry trash enclosure shall be provided using materials that match the primary
building.
11, The applicant shall provide the city with an easement for the lift station located at the
southwest comer of the site.
12, The applicant shall provide the city with a signage easement at the comer of County
Road E2 and Cleveland A venue for a Gateway Sign.
13, The applicant shall provide and install sidewalks adjacent to the public right-of-way
along both the north and west side of the property.
14. The applicant shall provide a bicycle rack adjacent to the sidewalk along the front ofthe .
building.
15. A PUD Permit and Development Agreement be approved by the City Council prior to the
issuance of a building permit.
16. The applicant obtains all necessary permits from Ramsey County.
17. Compliance with the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance,
18, If necessary, further review of parking requirements be conducted within a six month to
one year period to determine if the estimated traffic and parking required for the proposed
building is consistent with the Building and Professional Office use.
19. That any exterior signage not on the building be a monument style sign, reviewed by staff
and subject to the City's signage ordinance,
Update
Subsequent to the Planning Commission meeting, staff noticed that the aesthetic element of the
building was not fully addressed by the conditions of approval. Staff had suggested that the
cultured stone base be continued along the sides of the property and this item was discussed by
the Planning Commission however it was not reflected in the Commission's recommendation.
The City Attorney has recommended that the applicant plat the property. Staff has
recommended adding a condition that the applicant must plat the property prior to issuance of a
building permit.
.
.
.
.
Page 3 00
December 12, 2002
Planning Case #02-32
Therefore, staff recommends that the following conditions be added:
20. That the cultured stone base shall be continued along the north and south sides of the
building.
21. That the property shall require final plat approval prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Deadline for Al!encv Actions
The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on November 7,
2002, Pursuant to Minnesota State Statue, the City must act on this request by January 6, 2003
(60 days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60 day
review period. The City may with the petitioners consent extend the review period beyond the
120 days.
Olltions
1.
2.
3,
Recommend approval as submitted.
Recommend approval with conditions,
Recommend denial. Ifthe City denies the petitioners request, "...it must state in writing
the reasons for the denial at the time that it denies the request",
Table for additional information.
4.
~
~
EN HILLS
.
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
November 26, 2002
PC Agenda Item 3.A
TO:
Planning Commission
FROM:
Peter Hellegers, City Planner
SUBJECT:
Planning Case #02-32, ArdenRidge Master and Final PUD,
County Road B-2 and Cleveland Avenue
Request
.
The applicant is r~uesting Master and Final Planned Unit Development approval to construct a
six unit office condo building at the comer of County Road B-2 and Cleveland Avenue,
Overview
Surrounding Area
North
R-1: Single Family
Residential
R-2: Single & Two Single Family Detached
...-..-.-.~~~i1~~~~i'tf~~ "1-". Rev. SidElrltti.'ll_...............
F '1 R 'd r I acan
arn'Y_Els1.en '''!._-.- --...---.--.----....
NA (New Brighton) NA (New Brighton)
Passive Open Space
I Park
L___~~~_~~~_
,
South i Neighborhood Business
.........--.----.-.-+----...--.--.----.. .... ..... ... ....
E~st___j Neighborhood Busi~~~_s_
West NA (New Brighton)
Site Data
.
.
Memo to Planning Commission
Planning Case #02-32
Page 2 of8
Background
The concept plan for this development was seen by the Council in July of 2002.
Site Plan and PUD Review
According to the Zoning Ordinance, "the 'PUD' District promotes the development ofland in a
unified manner by treating the entire development as a single entity. . . ." Since this project
went through a concept review process, the applicant has elected to have both the Master and
Final PUD considered concurrently.
The following provides an evaluation of site plan and related requirements based on the attached
plan set:
1. Zoning: Code Requirement Met
Office is a permitted use within the N-B: Neighborhood Business District.
. 2. Lot Area and Setbacks - Code Requirements Met
As the site data in the overview section indicates, the property is 54,544 square feet. The
Neighborhood Business Zoning District requires a minimum lot area of 11,000 square feet.
The following table highlights the setback requirements:
Front Yard
Rear Yard
Side Yard -Corner
20 feet
20 feet
20 feet
20 feet
52 feet
20 feet
3. Lot Coverage - Code Requirement Met
The Neighborhood Business District requires that no more than 35% of the lot be covered by
structure. The proposed building footprint is 7,568 square feet while the parcel is 54,544
square feet. This results in 14% of the lot being covered by structure, less than half of the
code maximum.
4. Floor Area Ratio - Code Requirement Met
.
The floor area ratio is obtained by dividing the sum of a buildings floor area (15,136 sq. ft.)
by the amount ofthe lot area (54,544 sq. ft.). The floor area ratio cannot exceed 0.7 for the
Neighborhood Business District. The FAR for this project is 0.28, much less than the
maximum permitted.
Memo to Planning Commission
Planning Case #02-32
Page 3 of8
.
5. Landscape Lot Area - Landscape area requirement met; Does not meet landscaping
(caliper inches) requirement;
The minimum amount of landscape area for the Neighborhood Business District is 35 percent
of the lot area. The proposal shows 32,213 square feet oflandscape area of the total lot area
of 54,544 square feet or 59 percent.
Under the City's landscape plan design requirements, the minimum total caliper inches
required for trees can be arrived at by dividing the gross square footage of all floors of the
building (15,136) by 320. The resulting required minimum is 47.3 caliper inches oftrees.
However, as this property is in the Neighborhood Business Zoning District it is subject to the
special requirements for that district. Neighborhood Business landscaping requirements state
in Section 5, H, 5, a: "in addition to Appendix A..." (Appendix A is the procedural manual
which among other things outlines the regular requirements for landscaping as stated above)
"., .landscaping shall be provided at a rate of 3 caliper inches per 40 feet of public street
frontage". Since this is a corner property both the entire north (222.34 feet) and west (285
feet) sides would be considered public street frontage, The result would be an additional
38.05 caliper inches or a total requirement of 85.35 caliper inches. The applicant has .
proposed 70.20 caliper inches of deciduous, coniferous, and ornamental trees on the property.
Master and Final PUD approval should be conditioned on the approval of a revised landscape
plan by the City Planner. The revised plan should show the addition of 16 caliper inches of
trees and their placement on the site,
1-2 Stories
50 % (42.62 inches)
30 % (25.61 inches)
20 % (17.07 inches)
Proposed # of
Caliper Inches
35.7 caliper inches
21 .0 caliper inches
13.5 caliper inches
In addition to the trees outlined above, the applicant is proposing to plant approximately 29
Anthony Waterer Spirea as foundation plantings on the west side of the building.
6. Height - Code Requirement Met
The maximum building height allowed in the Neighborhood Business District is 35 feet. The
proposed elevations show a building height of 32 feet at the highest point (the average would
be 19-24 feet)
.
.
Memo to Planning Commission
Planning Case #02-32
Page 4 of8
7. Parking. - Does Not Meet Code Requirement For Spaces; Does Not Meet Parking Setback
Requirement (West/Cleveland Side)
The Zoning Ordinance requires I parking space for every 250 square feet of gross floor area
for Business and Professional Office uses. At the proposed 15,136 gross square feet of office
space, it would be necessary to provide 61 spaces to meet the code requirement. The
applicant is proposing 44 total spaces. The following table summarizes the provision of
parking on the site:
Some additional review may be necessary to determine if the estimated traffic and parking
required for the proposed building is consistent with the Business and Professional Office use
or if there is a more appropriate requirement. Since this is a PUD, a deviation from the code
requirement is permissible without granting a variance. However, the applicant will need to
provide the reasoning for why the proposed level of parking differs from the requirement (i,e,
the proposed office building is a less intense use than a standard Business and Professional
. Office, etc.).
In addition, the State Building Code and ADA parking standards call for a minimum of 2
handicapped parking spaces for parking lots of 26-50 spaces and 3 handicapped parking
spaces for lots of 51-75 spaces. Two handicapped parking spaces are designated on the site
plan. However, it the parking is to be reconfigured to meet the standard for Business and
Professional Office, then the applicant will have to provide an additional handicapped space.
Staff suggests that the applicant meet the State Building Code requirement for handicapped
accessible spaces.
Parking setback requirements are highlighted below:
County E-2: 20 Feet
Cleveland; 5 Feet
As the table above indicates, the proposed parking setback from the Cleveland Avenue right-
of-way is less than the required 20 feet. Since this is a PUD, a deviation from the code
requirement is permissible without granting a variance. The entire parking area will be
curbed, surfaced and striped in accordance with City design standards.
.
8. Access and Circulation. - Meets Code Requirement
There is one access point to the property. The access is proposed to be approximately 190
feet south of the intersection of Cleveland and County E-2. The Ramsey County Department
Memo to Planning Commission
Planning Case #02-32
Page 5 of8
.
of Public Works has indicated that the driveway should be located as far south as possible
and at it should not present a problem at the proposed location. Ramsey County has also
indicated that the minimum driveway (bituminous) width is 26 feet. As proposed the width
of the bituminous drive is 23 feet, 25 feet measured from the backs ofthe curbing. Approval
should be conditioned on a revised driveway width of 26 feet (may be 28 feet when measured
from the backs of the curbing).
A permit from Ramsey County will be required for all work in the County right-of-way.
9. Screening ~ Meets Code Requirement
Significant landscaping is proposed to screen both the parking on north side of the site and
some landscaping is also proposed to partially screen the parking area from the west side.
Additional screening from the west side may be addressed through additional landscaping to
be provided (see number 5). A trash area is proposed for the southwest end of the property.
Staff would suggest that a condition requiring a masonry enclosure with materials that match
the primary building be included.
10. Lighting - Meets Code Requirements
.
Lighting is identified on the lighting plan submitted with the application and is consistent
with the Zoning Ordinance, The Zoning Ordinance requires that all lighting be directed
away from adjoining lots or public streets and must be hooded so that light is only directed
onto the subject property.
The Neighborhood Business requirements call for parking lot lighting on pedestals not to
exceed not to exceed 14 feet. The lighting should be ornamental and not standard shoebox
lighting as this property is considered a gateway and part of the Neighborhood Business
district. Master and Final PUD approval shall be conditioned on approval of the ornamental
lighting by staff.
11. Sign age - No plans received
No signage has been proposed at this time. All signage shall conform to the City of Arden
Hills Signage Ordinance and will require staff approval. Although not required, staff would
suggest that any building sign be a monument style sign to preserve the character of the
surrounding area which is zoned R.2: Single and Two Family Residential.
12. Grading and Utilities.
The property would be serviced by eXlstmg utilities (sewer, water, gas, electric, and
telephone). Master and Final PUD approval should be conditioned on approval of a detailed
.
.
.
e
Memo to Planning Commission
Planning Case #02-32
Page 6 of8
utility plan by the City Engineer. Silt fencing will be placed around the property during
construction.
The sanitary sewer line on the proposed plan connects to the existing sewer at the southwest
corner of the property. According to Operations and Maintenance staff the existing sewer
has a tendency to backup and act as a sort of secondary lift station. To prevent the existing
sewer from backing up into proposed sanitary sewer, staff recommends that any new sewer
be located a minimum of three (3) feet above the current sewer line and then dropping in.
Master and Final POD approval should be conditioned on this change to the utility plan to
prevent any future problems.
13. Aesthetics
The Neighborhood Business district requires the use of face brick, stone, glass, or natural
wood products. All walls shall be treated with the same exterior materials. The applicant is
proposing shake style siding, maintenance free siding, and a cultured stone base as the
primary bnilding materials, The front of the building would feature the cultured stone base
and the shake style siding, the sides would be treated with a partial cultured stone base and
the shake style siding, and the rear would be treated with maintenance free siding. Staff
would suggest that the cultured stone base be continued along the sides of the property. In
addition the sides of the building should be treated with the same exterior materials, The
Commission may want to discuss whether the materials should be the shake style siding, the
maintenance free siding, or an altogether different material. Staff would also suggest that
any desired material changes be included as a condition of approval. A rendering of the
proposed building will be provided at the meeting for your review.
14. Other Issues
a. Storm Water Management. Since the site (1.25 acres) is under 2.5 acres, it will
not be necessary for the applicant to obtain a permit from the Rice Creek
Watershed District Master and Final POD approval should be conditioned on
approval of a detailed storm water management plan by the City Engineer.
b. Easement for the Lift Station. There is an existing lift station located at the
southwest corner of the property. Master and Final POD approval should be
conditioned on the applicant providing an easement for the lift station.
c. Easement for a Gateway Sign. This corner is designated as a gateway. Master
and Final POD approval should be conditioned on the applicant providing an
easement at the corner for a Gateway Sign.
d. Sidewalks. The Neighborhood Business District states that "sidewalks shall be
provided adjaccnt to all public rights-of-way." Master and Final POD approval
Memo to Planning Commission
Planning Case #02-32
Page 7 of 8
.
should be conditioned on the applicant providing and installing sidewalks
adjacent to the public rights-of-way.
e. PUD Permit and Development Agreement. Master and Final PUD approval
should be conditioned on the applicant executing a PUD Permit and Development
Agreement with the City,
f. Bicycle Racks. The Neighborhood Business District requires the provision of
bicycle racks in an area that is convenient to the main entryway into the building,
Master and Final PUD approval should be conditioned on the applicant providing
a bicycle rack adjacent to the sidewalk along the front (the west side) of the
building. Staff would suggest that the bicycle rack be located just southwest of
the building.
Deadline for Aeencv Actions
The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on November 7,
2002, Pursuant to Minnesota State Statue, the City must act on this request by January 6, 2003
(60 days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60 day
review period. The City may with the petitioners consent extend the review period beyond the
120 days.
.
Options
I, Recommend approval as submitted.
2. Recommend approval with conditions.
3. Recommend denial. If the City denies the petitioners request, "...it must state in writing
the reasons for the denial at the time that it denies the request".
4. Table for additional information.
Staff Recommendation
In Planning Case #02-32, staff recommends that the Master Plan Planned Unit Development, and
Final Planned Unit Development I Site Plan review be approved with the following conditions:
I. A revised landscaping plan shall be submitted to the City Planner for his approval.
2. The applicant shall submit a landscape performance bond or other surety for 125% of the
cost of materials and installation valid one full year from the date of installation.
3. All necessary building permits shall be filed with the City Building Official.
4. All fire prevention systems shall be approved by the Fire Inspector.
5, Lighting shall be ornamental style lighting and shall be submitted to the City Planner for his .
approval.
6, A final utility plan shall be submitted to the City Engineer for his approval.
.
.
-
Memo to Planning Commission
Planning Case #02-32
Page 8 of8
7. Any new sanitary sewer line that connects to the line at the southwest corner of the site be
located three (3) feet above the existing line and then dropped in to reach the existing line.
8. A final grading and drainage plan be submitted to the City Engineer for his approval.
9. A detail stormwater management plan shall be submitted to the City Engineer for his
approval.
10. A masonry trash enclosure shall be provided using materials that match the primary building.
11. The applicant shall provide the city with an easement for the lift station located at the
southwest corner ofthe site.
12. The applicant shall provide the city with a signage easement at the corner for a Gateway
Sign,
13. The applicant shall provide and install sidewalks adjacent to the public rights-of-way along
both the north and west side ofthe property.
14. The applicant shall provide a bicycle rack adjacent to the sidewalk along the front of the
building.
15. A PUD Permit and Development Agreement be approved by the City Council prior to the
issuance of a building permit.
16. The applicant obtains all necessary permits from and Ramsey County.
17. Compliance with the applicable provisions ofthe Zoning Ordinance.
If the Planning Commission makes a recommendation on this Planning Case, then it would be
heard at the Monday, December 16, 2002 special meeting of the City Council following the
regularly scheduled work session,
Attachments
1, Statement submitted by the applicant
2. A letter stating owner acknowledgement of the application.
3. Site and Utility Plans.
4. Landscape Plan received November 26, 2002 (used for this report)
5. Location Map.
.
Description of Request (also include a lelter explaioed the project:
'fRAMM BUILDERS & REALTORS, LLC is desiring to secure a building
permit for the construction of an office building. Said building
shall consist of six office units and shall be formatted as an office
condominiUlll. This request is being submitted under the guidelines
for a Planned Unit Development. Design of building was formulated to
concur to the requirements of the Neighborhood Business Zoning.
Filina Reauirem_nts and Payment of Fees
The City requests that you make a pre-application meeting with the City Planner \0 discuss the
application process, requirements and deadlines. The. undersigned acknowledges that ehelhe
understands that before this request can be <;QIl$idered, all required information and fees (InclUding IlII
deposits) must be paid to the City in advance. If additional fees are required to cover costs incuned by
the City, the City Planner has the tight to require additional payment from one or more of the
undersigned, who shall be jointly liable for such fees. Such expenses may indude (but IIt't'l not limtted to)
direct city payroll and overhead costs, fees paid 10 consultants and other professionals, and the cost of
printing, mailing and supplies. The City may withhold flllal action on a land use application and/or re$Cind
prior actioo unta all miscellaneous fees have been paid. Applicants are advised that an escrow deposit is
required at th. time of the submittal of the Land Use Application to offset costs associated with the
proposed prvject.
.
Reauired Submittal I nfonn ation
The City of Arden Hills requires the submitll'll of a certified land survey and site plan(s) for an develQpment
projects in the City. True and accutato representation of the requirements outlined in the procedural
form lor the speciTlIld type of request is the responsibility of the appllcanl The City requires five
(5) large scale copiee. !QI(led in sets no larger than 8 12" x 14" with the print side facing out plus fifty (SO)
copies of 11" x 17- reductions of all plans. Mailing labels of all properties within 350 flltt of the
property are required with this application. This information may be obtained from Ramsey County,
CompleteJlncomDlete ADPlications
An incomplete applicatlon WI'I delay the processing of land use requests, The application apprOllal Ume
commences and an application i$ <;QIlsidered officially filed when the City Planner has received and _
examined the application end determined that the application i$ complete. The decision whether the ..-
application is complete or incomplete shall be made within ten (10) business days following the submittal
of the application. When the application is deemed to be "compit<te" it shall be plaeed on the agenda of
the first possible Planning Commission meeting occuning at lea5t thirty (30) days from the dale Oloffltial
submission of the application.
. Notice of MeetinQ Attendance
tn order for the Planning Commission and the City Council to consider any application, the applicant or a
designsted representative must be present at ll1e scheduled meeting. If not, the maller will be tabled until
the next available agenda.
Aaenda Deadline and Meetin" Schedule
The deadline for submillal of land usa appUcations is required according to the schedule outlined below.
There are no exceptions. All Planning Commission meetings ara held on the first Wednesday of each
month at 7:30 PM. City Council m$Eltings are held the last Monday of the same month at 7:30 PM.
Meetings are held In the Council Chambers at the City of Arden Hills. 1245 West Highway 96. Arden Hills.
Minnesota 55112. unless otherwise stated. Applicants are adVised that additional meolings and/or
worl<shops are scheduled when necessary upon approval of the Planning Commission,
.
TENTATIVE TENTATIVE
PLANNING CITY COUNCIL
APPUCATlON COMI'/IISSI0N MEEmNG
DEADUNE MEETING DATE
DATe {Generally held on (Generally held on
(Mondav)" 1" Wednesday at 7:30 c.mJ last Monda" at 7:30 o.m.l
Oeoember 3 .'Januani,ll.., . . . ", . ,damiat\rQ8
...
Januarv7 Februarv 6 Febru"'" 25
Februarv 4 March 6... " Mlirch25
..
Merch 4 Apnl 3 Aor1l29
ADrI1 Mav1 .. " . ..Mav'28
Mav6 June 5 June 24
June 3 .Juv 10 Julv29
Julv 1 Auoust7 Aunust26
AUoust 5 Sei;)tember 4 :: .s..nternber30'
Sentember 9 Oetober 2 October 28
October 7 November 6 November 25.'
November 4 December 4 December 30
-
2002 SCHEDULE
Acknowledaement and Slanature
a read all of th. ation listed in the City of Arden Hills Land Use Application
Ibls for aU costs incurred by the ity related to the processing of
~~
T BUILDERS & REALTORS,
KIM L. TRAMM, PRESIDENT
Please JXlnlact the City Planner at (651 ) 634-5120 jf you have any questions regarding your application,
.
Page 3 on
.
,ACKNOWLEDGMENT
TO: The City of Arden Hills
FROM: Hans Hagen Homes, Inc.
RE: Tract A, Registered Land Survey Number 496, Ramsey County, Minnesota
Hans Hagen Homes hereby acknowledges that Tnunm. Builders & Realtors, LLC
is submitting a plan for a building on the property referenced above, of which we are the
owner. Please be advised that you are hereby given notice that Hans Hagen Homes, as
property owner, bas not consented to nor agreed to pay for any improvements on said
property and said improvements, if any, are not being made at Hans Hagen Homes'
request. Further, Hans Hagen Homes has not consented to nor agreed to pay for any City
fees, charges, etc. incurred or associated with the City's review or processing of Tramm
Builders and Realtors, LLC's subtnitta!.
.
Dated: 11/6 {DCA
.
.
('.
.....
o
U>
"
>
C-
'"
-........
-........
C(<lt;
(..q..vo
I-........~
~"-~
I: "-
I: 9 /;.
II '0
I:
~
II~
I~
I :i
- I
lit
loP .. I' "
Ii I \
, I.,
! I' II ;\
at · I.
=i ,'f'~~ II "
m I ~~~ I \
. o~ ..
, '1J ~~ 0 II
· t~' [8; I . '-
I i / ________ ~(l)p 5'
, _,I -- ~~!H~-=~-:~- ?'J
I --- 2-'<; "'"t"'_~ 1_
--rOC . \ "- f1i;~~
0:)" '\. '? I
,2 -- __ .....~
" g~. L --.~~~'~"~ III
~--- --;----/</ '"" i~.t
. I /,' ~'''-- _ '" ~ " '0 /4J~(.. /;
--..--_ ...;}------ ~ '0,
--?~- ~ ~ ~ ~
/)7 I ; ~ '...
/,/ I .3 ~
/,/ I
~z
-1i-<~
1.1<
..
o.
co
o.
'\
'... 1\
~
-~ 11
IiI cc
Zz
STAIR =i=i
\illimli N U>
co "
""c J"'
.z
'5! "'u>
D~ >"
.. -t Zo
illS! 0",
"im'1J ",'"
'"
!:i U>
I :!
...
C--I
?ijI
C
Z
::;
U> 0
'"
U>
"
>
c-
'"
."
o
'"
c
Z
-I
"
c-
>
Z
U>
is: 0) d tn
c: iit
(i) d en"llOl"ll d z ~
i -~c:m ~ ;
~ c r=~ ~ en
~;;ll;C- --
~zzo i ..... =l ~
~ is: (i)(i)~ ~ m
" ;;ll;OO~ ~
m ~ ~
~ ~~~~ z ~
::u
g (i) m
~.~.~
en. II
~ (i)mm .... .....
m ~
~ 00
c: ~
z
~ ~ ..... t =l ::u
.....~..... ~ m
N ~ N" . ~
N ~8m
..... 0
~ ..... ::u 3t!
en en ~enen ~ m
0 0 .OP ~
~ ~ ~~~
. . . en
, ~ 0
..... ~
'i!
...... ...... ......
-~
ecJ!
i!~."
""cel
"~Z3
. .. '"
. .. ~
"i '1J ':!
-i
1!
N
CO.
J
.1
'"
"'.
IDitJI
'"
-I
o
F
'"
-I
I.
44'
-
o
o
c
Z
-l
-<
'"
o
)>
'"
'"
N
~(Q)~
~~ 9
~ =0 Pl,
~ @ @)
~ @) ~
~~ ~
~ ~ '6l.
=0 (}A
=~
~@)
=0
~
<<@
>
.....
... M It. ~ fl..... 0
i Wlli'
I ~~~ ~ } g
!I:.::.... ..,<: 0
'IH:!~ ~
".. ~'''lt:L 0
,:rl>-Z;l:t ~
. "E:ll'<
;,'" ~ ;r!1
';1 ;~
a~i-'l...
fm~
cl ~ ~
~;j r
~.. .
~ ~ ~
'1 0
~ ~
z .
It
g
p l ~
. ~
~ ..
1 .W z
~ ' ~
~ i!:
~ .~
, N
~ "
, !l
I
I ~r; ! i
D'~ l f
J It (1) ,
I tlll::! ~
~~ I I
eaq It
l:l '" g i
/Ill '" ,
\"
\.l)
V>
0
".
r
"'
"
~ c If'
~ r ~
. . ~
z c l< .
z ~ ~ z
~ . m m ~
. z " , .
z '" z
. . '" ~
"C z z () ~ ? ~
() 0
i:: ",m c ;;; m "
'" r If' ",m
a~ ~ '"
Q;j -~ c l< '" a Qij
Zm ~ .
Zm om m m ~ '" Z Zm
om 0 I ~ m 0 "m
'" '" Z
~
~ .? ~
0 .
Z m Z
m '" .
'" '" Z
N. . a ()
'" Z ",m '"
m " 2il c
r
Zm 0
om Z
0
~ '"
z z
. .
~ ~
m m ~
I I I
'" '" '" Z
~ ~ "
B ? ? r !
m m m
~
~ '"
!i a a
z z !i
0 "
m
!! !~
.... .
it- ..:I '"
~
. i ito I
.
r
. . Z ~
~J ~ '"
~
I ~! z
,.. "
"
~ i' '" r
m
'" z '"
I . .
Z ~ ~ !I
" m m .
., r I I '"
m '" '" ~
'" ~ ~ ~ '"
- ? ? I ., m
a . m
m m S -
.!! '" '" a
a a .!!
z z
" "
~~
o.
n '" zz
o~
~ I .
l< z
~ .
c m
'" '" Z
m ~ ()
0 ? m
"'~ "'~ '" m ~
~ ~
o~ 2.1:= ~ '" m n ~ ~~
2:3 zz 0 m ~ z a.
0"" m Z . zZ
". . ~ ^ ,,~
z z '" " C m
~ '" I ~
. . m '" Z
Z Z m 0 ~ ~
i:: " ?
m ~ n
~ ~ "" m m
~ ~ '" ~
m m m 0 '"
m m Z m
'" m
. 0
~
.
II
..m
itr-
. ~
"'l~
'0
Z
z
o
I~
"r-
,~
"'l!i
,-
o
z
'~
:e
> ~ ~ n ~ i I ~~ i f i B!~8"" i
. ~hU[
~ : if J
N & ~ ... ~ ~ !'ill- "''<1
" .. ol' z i I ~ (\l , Z1i;!'g
ti E ol' 0
',ji . t:1 ~ ZI ~ ..,- t-
I ..~
l ~ m I~~ ~i~!i.:r
~ .~ g.... i ~I "';.;
e:~ ~i_l ~
3 ~ ~ 3 S."i.:'...
2 ~(\l fin r
.
N::::O(QOJ-...Jo)c.n.J>.(..J~"'::' I I!!i !I ~i ar~ it{Ii; i~rf~ld 33 e ~ B~ -
'-"~"-"'"-".................-,-,,,-,,'"-"'"-" III ~jj~~~ngm
I I I I I I I x ~ C) il jjf ~., ~ J!ia
~_v~-vg III Jf 'T' r' ,...,
.. II II II r: ~~~I !ll.lj ~. t!f :f!~fjl; ~m ~: ~!~ I~g AI
I z \ n 0
0 ~~ 19 -f , I ~ Ii ~Il-i' f I} m~ g ~l n l ijJ Ul
o CJ 0 0 0 0000" 0-00 ~
~~~~~~~~~~~~ d~ ~~ f' ~ ,I · r I1J': t . , 'f !M i .~ ~ ~
s.s.~ 6 2-S-sa.~ ~ ~ 2. ~ II ~l ~ ~
~~~ff~g~~~~~i] ;~~ t j . ! ~ r~ n .tH sa ~ iW ;hl ~~ (")
r- 0
~~~~f.i~~~~~C1~ :;l ~~ ~ i ~ l ~ ~jHni -i C ~~ ~ ~!. : "~ z
-.g.g.g ~~~.g~.g ~ ~ " ~ ~ I i~ ! jij :iJ
~ ~ 0 0 S' 5' 5' g S' a s' ::": '" l I ~ r' j; ~" I ,..., .......~ 0
z ~ ~ ~J ~ ~
:J II ~ ~ <.0 LO..o @ o.a (1) l.Cl g ~~ ~~ · i · I Ii Jl 'ii () I.....~.. 1ft i ~ f~i: H r-
g o..a.a...U1~{f)a.Ulo.() ,..., I I ii ~ ~ ! I. z
!::2~(f) o~g UJ-g og s- o
Qs-g3~;:;;-g....goo n:!i i H!l H:li I ~ h~ p~ ;:;1
3~;:o: 3Q-[!loC;3 I - I 101 tl~,' Ul
3~ O,,<!:!](Il~""'5' . ...- 111"h I !; 'I~ I if
9,'< S. (j)~ i3 2 ~~i ~~ I fl<jlJJ I
::J"V) ~s.6' (1) ;~~ I~ i J i r ;1
(l) (1) -, :J fJ
. ~ 0
~ ~ ~~ l i ~ g
(j:\u;;prOj\02580. Tramm Builderslbase4.dwg, 11/4/20023:11 :35 PM, cap,
\\R ,eBG
'~
"
:.
;u
;u
o
(")
^
~
~
~
,
~
':!
co
.
u
C;
@
o
UJ
'UJ
~ ~
1 ~ ~ f
~ ~
~ ~
~ '
, ~
~ ~
~
~
~~
- .'
O~"""-1
. ,0
:filili'i
".
",
~
~
~
Hi
fH
hf
~l'}
I -I
~!i
t,
~~
.~"
'\(i
k
, l~
I
t=-~ ~ ~~ '".
I -~i- \
8t,
, :-- ...
NJO~2'49"L'__ . ~-\
. 8~ . i'"
'l ~ '.. / /
,. o't'$ ~ /;/,11,
'- - - ----. ~':l ~~ ,
- - - . ~rf S\ .,' #:
I.. ~ / ,'" ';:,.'io~~ ,~,:t!i ~.
"J>~' .~ ~~ ~~ :~
-4' · ,,"....... ~~.
~ / . ~
.------'" , -
,;
i'iic;
.'
~.
~i
0>0
~
,
" ""''''
'" 1
" , i't; 'Ib Gooooo'fg,
~;; <P. ~11iI( 62-1"0.. 'lIIo;.>>
"' ....,t~ "'481,/ 'i
a (") , 8rt) jlll
,
en n~ ,
" , (") I , ,
~ ~ I
,
I ,
, ,
,
'. \
llll ~l
~ ~~~ i
~r-~i3
,v, "
~~~ ~
"i'\
Vl~<'
~~~
~ '~
!f'l1S
~~~'{J
''"''''j
~O')~
, '"
, -
~ Cj F
, ('l
~
JiAC:lTrc ~ ~ v
Q
~~
~~
-< ,
o
~
~
,'-
\J
::0
m
r
~
Z
)>
~
o
::0
)>
o
z
o
~
o
::0
)>
)>z
::0)>
00
m ~m
Zm
d;~
roo
r_
~oo 0
s:Z
zO
o
@
r
)>
Z
o
~
r
~
\J
>
Z
)>
:0
o
m
z
:0
-
o
C)
m
o
"
"
-
o
m
(D
c
-
r
o
-
z
(;)
............... ..~..;:;7.
t::.~'UJ\V4.....VU .'~""" .......,,'-'........,
DSERVERIHP5r_
n n
~ ~ :.:
~ :u
>~
~'"
~~
~~
~~
~~
"'~
.....;;:....;:;:..~~'"'
""~~
~~
~~
""=.;:;:.:-,.
~'"
~~
l;
a
j3l ~
C) i Il>
h~
~ ~
q
~ ..
- ~
~ ~
~
~
~
~
~
I
~
....."::........
"
.....~':::.......
.....""=::.,......
..."''''........
~"
......~':::..":::........
......~.....
......""'::..-
....~--
--~~~-::::.'::;",-::..~-::..~-
....."'::..,-
--:::.......
"
"
"
"
"
"
'\
II
"
"
'I
"
'I
"
I,
I,
"
"
I,
"
I,
"
I,
"
I,
'I
'I
'I
I,
"
'I
II
'I
I,
'I
I,
II
"
'I
I,
I,
I,
'I
I,
I,
I,
'I
"
"
II
I,
"
"
I,
I,
"
I,
I,
'I
I,
"
'I
I,
I,
I,
"
"
I,
"
'I
'I
'I
I,
I,
"
"
'I
!I
"
"
"
"
'~
'.......
"
",
"
'"
\
I
K---"-
,
..........
~
"
~
,,'
,,'1
11,'8
'" ,
'" 1
~ 1\
I I
/ \
I
'1
4= ' \
- -1- ---~.!~
, \
. -- \
NI0"12'49";--- I __
88.ao
,
.
I
"
, ~
~
Ul
, n
~
I .....___ I "./l
~ t .c,' jJ..-' t/ /
'I ~.~<l/'
--.L_____ . <t "<t.,\~".",
oq ~-;<u lO ~
I / ~...~~ <r"\
, / J>~' ~ .
/ .. ..'~
0!
,
~I .---------
ll?...r
.............
::JrI1...'V<~4..ltJow
-....;,;;;...
"
l
I
I
.....-..
f ,,~~
~,.,.~ !~
~~~~i~
~>:t'"
-'" '"
~j;; ~
l::"'''
~h~
~ffi~
w~~~!
&"'~'ill
~ 8 i=
~ ()
'i~ S~ ~
xb ~
i " ~
"'
'I '"
" " ~ '"
r' ~
III III
RI
~
~
U>
Vl~
O ~~
-i _
1\5~
ii
~
JlA-CNrflC
~"g
B11~.~1II
'"
'"
"
....
....
:t>
:lJ
o
m
z
:lJ
-
o
>~C)m
:oZ
00 0
mCIJ
z 0 "
::c > "
--0
rm -
r -0 0
~~ m
~Z z ro
g! C
-
r
o
-
z
o
'.
H~f
p~
. - ~"
'.
<!. ;e<:
- -j
~,
,
~
..."'N~ ~rl
, ,
:,-J>"J> '.
. o_
f -I
- ~'i
ar
~ ",,-,,<.0 >< l
~i~~
................
~~~~
~"" ~N
N" ~.
~c;;:t "I
0." o~
,
I
F
!
~~
-.
~ '
~!
H
P'
S
f
g~
~
"':t'~
.. '.
." ,
<t~
,.
;l
, .
";;l ~ ;-
((
.
e
e Z "
e Z
.
" .
~ N
.
: "
0 ;;;
"
0 0
, .
0 .
..
. .
.
. N
.
~
~
~ Z
~ e
c ~
" .
N ~
.
w
~ -
0 ~
"
.
t; ~
" ~
" ,
,
Ip~
1:
;;;
~
~
b
I" ~
N
.
"
~
.
,
~
.
I" ~
N
"
~
n
r
[T1
<
fT1
r
J>
Z
t:l
:J>
<
fT1
Z
C
[T1
or
i
e
.,
~~
,
~l
P"
~,
.~
<
.
~\
I
~
.
~
"
.
~
~
(J\
.
.
e
e
.
"
e
e
. . ~
.. '" ~
~ '" ~
~ .. "
~
. , ~
" ;
" . .
~ 0 ~
"
.. . ~
~ " ..
0 " "
.
" '" ;;
.
~
~
,
b
o
.
.
~
" N
'" "
.
.. ;;
" .
" :
;;; ;;
N W
.. .
,
N
.
.
e
e
e
.
e
e
;;
,
~ ;;
" -
"
N ,
"
N ,
. ..
;;
"
IO~ i I J Bi ~ i; () . .. t~
t!II:j .,,'" ~ p n i adH I ~!! i l b: i'--'
5.. i ::t., ! I;: !i~~
I ,l;j:l. . ~.
..... " l It EC:" ..,< 0 ~ ~h~ I
i .. z !D(b .. f ;'K;~'n l
> ~ Q ,
. .. . .. l:l ~ a-. ~:~ 0 ~ ~lf~t:; Iii' f~. .. ~f)
- ~
n I~~ ri"'::;'" If
~ e.!l1'<l CJl ~~~~ . P'i~
l i ~"'ai;: :'" !j'i' ~~.' :;
. !i:j:l. t II ~:Zl . .. ~~ ... r"!i~ "
I .
,~ ..! ~... . .
. " ~ ~ "'iJl:l -,t' ~ g
, ~d Jil(b Hi;
"
.
U1
~
,
VI
n
p
"?
..f>.
~
..
a<
II
w
I
o
.
rv e
.
.
.
TRAMM BUILDERS & REALTORS, LLC
3585 Lexington Avenue North
# 173 Arden Plaza Business CenteT
Arden Hills, MN 55126-8016
651-636-5100 TEL
651-636-5200 FAX
tbr .llc@!rncleodusa.net
November 4, 2002
Mr. Peter Hellegers
City Planner
City of Arden Hills
1245 West Highway 96
Arden Hills, MN 55112-5794
RE: Proposal for ArdenRidge Office Building/E2 And Cleveland Site
Dear Mr. Hellegers:
We are pleased to submit the accompanying Land Use Application
dated November 4, 2002, and associated plans for the development
of the site and project referenced above. We are proposing to
construct an office building consisting of six office units which
shall be built in the format of an office condominium project.
We have designed the structure and project in harmony with the
requirements of the Neighborhood Business Zoning. Our request
for the approval of this project is submitted under the
provisions set forth in the City's Planned Unit Development
process. We are available to answer your questions regarding any
aspect of this request. We look forward to working with you and
the City of Arden Hills.
ely yours,
~~
Kim L. Tramm
.'
., .
~
~
~UbcaJ B A ~
Drainage Diagram for 580TRAMM
Prepared by PLOWE ENGINEERING, INC. 10m02
HydroCAOO 6.00 sIn 001574 @1986-2001 Applied Microcomputer Systems
.
.
.
580TRAMM Type 1/ 24-hr Rainfal/=5.90"
Prepared by PLOWE ENGINEERING, INC. Page 1
. HydroCAOO 6.00 sin 001574 @ 1986-2001 Applied Microcomputer Systems 1017/02
Time span=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=O.05 hrs, 301 points
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Type II 24-hr Rainfall=5.90"
Reach routing by Stor-Ind+ Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method
Subcatchment 1 EX: EXISTING
Tc;15.0 min CN;61 Area=0.980 ac Runoff= 2.35 cfs 0.142 af
Subcatchment 15: (TO POND 1)
Tc;8.0 min CN=86 Area=0.610 ac Runoff; 4.11 cfs 0.205 af
5ubcatchment 25: TO POND 2
Tc=7.0 min CN=76 Area=0.370 ac Runoff; 2.05 cfs 0,094 af
Pond 1P: (POND 1)
Peak Storage= 2,346 cf Inflow= 4.11 cfs 0.205 af
Primary= 3.47 cfs 0.174 af Outflow= 3.47 cfs 0.174 af
Pond 2P: POND 2
Peak Storage= 5,977 cf Inflow= 5,30 cfs 0.268 af
Primary= 1.07 cfs 0.161 af Outflow= 1.07 cfs 0.161 af
Runoff Area = 1.960 ac Volume = 0.442 af Average Depth = 2.70"
.
.
580TRAMM Type 1/ 24-hr Rainfal/=5.90"
Prepared by PLOWE ENGINEERING, INC. Page 2 .
HydroCAO@ 6.00 sin 001574 @ 1986-2001 Applied Microcomputer Systems 1017/02
Runoff
Subcatchment 1 EX: EXISTING
=
2.35 cfs @ 12.08 hrs, Volume=
0.142 af
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0,05 hrs
Type II 24-hr Rainfall=5.90"
Area (ac) CN Description
0.980 61 GRASS
T c Length
(min) (feet)
15.0
Runoff =
Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(ft/f!) (ft/sec) (cfs)
Direct Entry, EXISTING
:)1..., r.....;;.; "-
.;> .
c J..{ ~ f '-
Subcatchment 1S: (TO POND 1)
1.24 - O' >
- )(D,(,(-, ~ J
/2.
4.11 cfs @ 11.99 hrs, Volume=
0.205 af
":17'1(. 'tr
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type II 24-hr Rainfall=5.90"
Area (a c)
0.180
OAOO
0.030
0.610
Tc
(min)
8.0
Length
(feet)
Runoff
=
CN Description
61 GRASS
98 ROOF, BIT. WALK
85 POND/MARSH
86 Weighted Average
.
Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(ft/f!) (ft/sec) (cts)
Direct Entry, GRASS/BIT./PIPE
Subcatchment 2S: TO POND 2
0, b 1 ~ _ , ,"
- ,,-.; I - ,0 _ I A(. "
J"., .
. - ~ ') 2. 7 ff5
2.05 cfs @ 11.98 hrs, Volume=
0.094 af
Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Type II 24-hr Rainfall=5.90"
Area (a c)
0.200
0.100
0.070
0.370
T c Length
(min) (feet)
7.0
eN Description
61 GRASS
98 ROOF
85 POND/MARSH
76 Weighted Average
Slope Velocity Capacity Description
(ft/f!) (ft/sec) (cfs)
Direct Entry, ROOF/GRASS
r: ';_""?'.
.~~. ':-4",-.,"
/" .
It; ?l...",- .
",,J -
.:"., t _'j';
;j.../J
~ (4 J ~
.'
'.
580TRAMM Type /I 24-hr Rainfal/=5.90"
Prepared by PLOWE ENGINEERING, INC. Page 3
. HydroCAOO 6.00 sin 001574 @ 1986-2001 Applied Microcomputer Systems 10/7102
Pond 1P: (POND 1)
Inflow =
Outflow =
Primary =
4.11 cfs @ 11.99 hrs, Volume=
3.47 cfs @ 12.04 hrs, Volume=
3.47 cfs@ 12.04 hrs, Volume=
0.205 af
0.174 af, Atten= 16%, Lag= 3.1 min
0.174 af
Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Peak Elev= 880.18' Storage= 2,346 cf
Plug-Flow detention time= 79.3 min calculated for 0.174 af (85% of inflow)
Storage and wetted areas determined by Prismatic sections
Elevation
(feet)
877.00
878.00
880.00
880.50
Surf.Area
(sq-ft)
44
380
1 ,464
1,800
Inc. Store
(cubic-feet)
o
212
1,844
816
Primary OutFlow (Free Discharge)
t..1=Culvert
.
# Routing
1 Primary
Cum.Store
(cubic-feet)
o
212 10141+"> \2.,7'1.,;J
2,056 ~-
2,872
Invert Outlet Devices
879.10' 18.0" x 52.0' long Culvert
RCP, rounded edge headwall, Ke= 0.100
Outlet Invert= 879.00' S= 0.0019 'r n= 0.012 Cc= 0.900
Pond 2P: POND 2
[79] Warning: Submerged Pond 1 P Primary device # 1 INLET by 0.35'
Inflow =
Outflow =
Primary =
5.30 cfs @ 12.01 hrs, Volume=
1.07 cfs @ 12.32 hrs, Volume=
1.07 cfs @ 12,32 hrs, Volume=
0.268 af
0.161 af, Atten= 80%, Lag= 18.5 min
0.161 af
Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20,00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs
Peak Elev= 879.45' Storage= 5,977 cf
Plug-Flow detention time= 145.5 min calculated for 0.161 af (60% of inflow)
Storage and wetted areas determined by Prismatic sections
Elevation
(feet)
876.00
878.00
879.00
880.00
Surf.Area
(sq-ft)
276
1,548
3,288
4,400
Inc. Store
(cubic-feet)
o
1,824
2,418
3,844
. Primary OutFlow (Free Discharge)
t..1=Culvert
Cum.Store
(cubic-feet)
o
1,824
4,242 -
8,086
,-' -~.~.~
,
i(~;,~ --") ; !..c."'")
~
.
".' "~I_,'4+4:::cL2
/+vA'l--i.-
~ S' ') s-;~
-> '----
-----
580TRAMM
Prepared by PLOWE ENGINEERING, INC.
HydroCAOO 6.00 sin 001574 @ 1986-2001 Applied Microcomputer Systems
Type 1/ 24-hr Rainfal/=5.90"
Page 4
1017102
# Routing
1 Primary
Invert Outlet Devices
879.001 12.0" x 32.0' long Culvert
RCP, rounded edge headwall, Ke= 0.100
Outlet Invert= 874.50' S= 0.1406 'f n= 0.012 Cc= 0.900
.
.
.
e
.
.
PO:).. t;" 8"0
(A-lcJ:>EN !-IILLS
OFFICE BI..I>G;)
"I'i-ViC-'/)
"-76
( Pi! e Code
PI GlIRE )- 2
ENC-l))
XYDROLOCIC CUllVE Nl!MBER COMP'J'l'ATION SHEET
V. I.. DttM1MtHI O' ^G1JC\1l'1Il.l
lOll C0<01u'VA11QN U....C!
::
,....
1;:
I::
~.
fi'
~;::
:!.
:i
'"
~.
.,.
l:
P l<<l P () $ e P LANl' USE FUR URBAN A. 'lEAS
Pre'ent or Future
.,"'r,n'd TO POND ..:2.Sn, D.A.
Comput.ed by Cw I'";; 04t.e CheeXed. by
o. '37
Acres
Dot,/O- 7-02
I Cl.l.rve Nurnbl!!lr"
, Acre:t Moi~ture Condition II
! LAND USE DESCRIPTION Por A B C 0
: Prac"tice Soi13 50i1.3 So113 S0113 Product.
CuI ~lva.ted Land. wi. thout con-'erva.tlon trl!atment 72 8, 88 91
With con'ervation treatment 62 71 78 8,
?a~ture Dr rLnge 1.a.no: poor condi t.ion 68 79 86 89
,;ood condition 3" 6, 7~ 80
Me"'daw: gOOd. condl t.ion Xl 58 7' 78
, '. I
I \.load or ~"'ore3't. l&11d: tn.ln oS tand. poOr cover,
, no mulch 45 66. 77 8)'
I good cover 25 55 70 77
,
j Open Spaces. lawns, parks. golt cour:!3es, c eme-
I -;'e:'les, e:.c.
i good condl tion; grass COver on 75% or more 3})
I of the area O.~O )Q 74 80 I;J,; ;;>0
I rur condition: graa3 cover on 50% to 751-
I of the a.rea 49 69 79 84
; CO:m\II!:-c:-;al and bu~ine.5:l1 area:5 (851- imperviou.s) 8Q 92 94 95
:nCiJs::'lal di.9tnct.3 (72% impen'lous) 8, 88 9' 9}
; R<l:s:..dent::. al:
: A ve ra~e 10< si'tl!: AVeraRe % Imperviou~
;
: 1 '8
acre or le~~ 65 77 85 90 92
1/~ acre )8 6, . 75 8} 87
: 1/) acre Xl 57 72 8, 86
, 1 f2 acre 25 54 70 80 A5
: acre 20 51 68 79 84
?aved ?arklng lot-oS. T'Qof~. driveways. et.e. 0./0 98 r@ 98 98 9.!
..; :.reets and :"Oads:
;>.1.ved Wl th cl.lrbs and stonn sewer, 98 98 98 98
gravel '16 85 89 Q1
dll''t n 82 87 . 8<1
i ~.l:-sh .n o~ Cll'J..I 05 '>.
,
, 'J1.la';
,.
t
~\::
)j~'
":j:
~.,.
I~r,"
t
:t
,.
,,;.
"
~
..
N
,l:
~:
ro'
,'.
f
,I,
li'-,
:r
~
~;
~~
it
..'
J:
~".
,,'
,.
,.
,f:,'
"
11.:.:..
~~(;;.
,',..'
"'.
:1,:;
.l...
f:
(
'.~~:.:
'f..::.
,'".
:".
Tc'tal Acres O. ~"7
Welgh'ted Runoff Curve No. Product Tot.a!
'1'ot.41 Acres
::;)79)
p~~tal
"(5
2.-7.9 ~/< .i~]
)-4
N!
~;: -
c"
MN-t:NG-73
"-76
(File Code ENG-l))
Po;;:;. t;" gO
F'IGtIRE 3-2
(AR.C>EN )lILL> OI'f:IC~ Pi..D'-
~ROLOGIC CURVE Nl!MBER COMP'J'l'ATION SHEET
V. 1.. ottAtI....IH' O~ ^CUCUVUll
101l co...uaYAJ'lC!" ~tlV1Ct
i.'
I:'
I'
~::
PROPD,'2P
P"re3ent or future
LAm:' US E fU R lIRllAN A. 'lEAS
.
TO POND
I
tJ.h I
...., :'er~hed
51 t-e
D,A.
AC re3
:;:;ompu ted by
Checked by
DH.(O~ I ~O~
Dat.e
r
{
:.;:
v'
"\.
f
'<,
q:"
'.
:!.
"
I!;
:1;
.!;
. i~:
-'
~;
I CUnre Number.!
I Acre.! Moiature Condl~1on II
! LAND USE DESCRIPTION Per A B C D
, Pr.a.ct.iee Soils SOil:!! So11~ Soth Product
,
C1,l,1 tlvated Land: ~thout con$ervatton trea~ent 72 8, 88 9'
wi th conaer"Vlltion treAtment 6~ 71 78 8,
ra3't-ure or range land: poor condi t.ion 68 79 86 89
",ood condition )'l 6, 7~ 80
MeJ,dol.l: good eondl ti.on )J 58 71 78
. ..
I Wood 0" Fore:l"t land: tlun atand, poor COVer.
, no mulch "5 66 7? 8). I
I good cover 25 55 70 77 ..
i Jpen Spaces. lawns. park~ . golf eourses, ceme-
! ~e:-les. e~c_
i good condition: graas COver on 75'i Or more 0./8" @ /0;98
I or tile area )'l 1" 80
i falr condi tion: gr&I!IS cover on 50% to 75'i
I ot "the area 49 69 79 84
1 Co.wn4!:,c;al ano bu.:Jiness area.:J (85% impervious) 89 92 9' 95
::1I::"'5:':'1a1 dl s tn c t." (72% impervlous) 81 88 91 93
j ::es:.dent:al;
~ Average lot. "he Average % Impervious
:
1'8 acre or less 65 77 85 90 92
., l.a acre 3B 6, . 75 8} 87
, 1" acre )J 57 72 81 86
./
I 1'2 acre ~5 5" 70 80 85
: acre 20 51 68 79 84
:'o.v~d ;Jarklng: lo'ts. roof", dri vewa.ys. et'C. 0.4-0 98 r9V 98 98 3~.~
.~:'('eets .;).fJcI. :-cads: .
;Javed. w1th curb.:3 and stann sewe rs 98 98 98 98
gravel '16 85 89 9'
dIrt 12 8~ 87 89
i :"iarsh 'tC o .~ J ::/.
-
I 1Jt.:~t':"
IJ'
mL
m,'
Wj,..,:., .
iF
'l:"
I"
f:
;m{:
.!:.....
~'"
:E
0,61
Tct.al Acres
~elght.ed Runoff Curve No. Product Tot.al
Tot-a! Acres
P:-Oduct Total "'- ~ ;) 3
~~
.........".----'"
') .2.7 V
.---:C I
3-4
.
:;'-:"
to.
,
.
PLQWE ENGINEERING, INC.
9180 LEXINGTON AVE. N,E.
CIRCLE PINES, MN 55014
(763) 785-1043 FAX 786-6007
_.~
C UN Y _-'1
;- cii..-(';':'
"';;:'" .
..,""'" /d_<S> ,
~t,'~..}:c'''''C-..:c:;'
"'
'"
.0
.,
~
'"
:g
'5
III
E
E
-
"'~
0'"
- "'
._'"
2-l
0.-
",0
90
pal
(')0;=
'-'-'-'~'-'-'-'-'-'-.-.-....-.-,-.....
-?--.:-.
-j
A
J
i~
, '1
1 f.!
I "
1 '.I
,
I
\
10/7/01-
fill O€/tI ~ I P6E oFF! C c
8u II-PIN G
~k~DJ~
C}
z
o
-.J
-
:::>
m
w
()
IT:
u..
o
w
C}
o
a:
z
w
o
a:
<(
zZ
<(~
..J -
a..CJ)
..J
W..J
a..-
<(:I:
oz
CJ)W
00
za:
<(<(
..J
~
~
-8~
at-.
~
.
:II 18 :Il 18 Ii
.... ~.3.3
S'; , <;. S :; ,3 _
. ... - ...
!
~:;: ~
lIl! ';;""""" ~
r! ~~<; ~
:;J.'lo:<.i"i'''
~ ~<>...
Q~~g
~~~~
~ I~~ ~
t:i~~
I "~.,
l~~,l-
t
'5t 3'
'< II l
:" 01
^ . .
~ ~: ! ~ ~j i
~ Zl\l it l! :l..
., - Ii
~ it 3 31 ~
0, I.
't l ~ 'i ::I
g u
. f ~
i !
'i 0
\
,
~ ~.
~. - - ,
~ 5" ... .,
I
I
L~. i;
1~1t 0
- :i:: ~1
,--- ~.
. z
u
~
i<.
.
'.
'.
'.
"
"
'.
'.
"
"
"
'.
'.
"
"
"
,
'.
"
"
"
,
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
'.
"
"
"
"
"
"
'.
"
"
'.
'.
"
"
"
"
'.
'.
"
'.
'.
"
"
'.
"
"
,
"
"
"
"
I,
,\,
'\",~
,::~:""'~.,""""',.
~""'-"''>..",-",,-~
'':.."'''o:.~
V~<.~'-,
'",,-,
'"''
-I'-... ^.
~a. ~..
~,.~t ~,
<0~/.1 }J~~~~
! j'lii~
. .
.
. .
'.
~I ~
. ~
~~:<
, ,
~/ :
. .
"
~
,
"
~
',;."':..;;""'>
....,'...... .",
"',
/
~
;i
[
"
-~
....~ "'. .
-""-.. ,-." "<<., -
.............. . "'Q<I'Q.1tl?J <<<--<l
..............-..~-..""...........~'-<<-<<-<-<
''''~''''
"'",~
"" .......
.....
~ ~ ~
,
,
,
i
,
!
.
OJdlo\:9
:>.
~ ~
(I) (\J
(I)
LL ::J
0
0 :>.
0 (I)
. 0 ~
~ ::J
(j)
-
0
~
0
Z
Cl
0 (\J
0 2
l,()
(I)
~
0
Z
.
~
c:::
Oa.
~CG
O:E
...J
~
o 'l:I
N~QC:
Mill::),,!!!
. G.l G.l
NC::Cl.:;.
Q -..
=It ol:l ~ .:::
G.l III ._ (,;l
III ... Ll. 'l:I
III G.l 'l:I c:
(,;l :E c: III
0'1 '5 III N
C:"'...W
.- G.l
c: '" .... :>,
c: '" III o!:!!
III E III !;;
~E==~
III (,;l
...
I-
o
o
o
l,()
w
z
tZl
~
MINUTES
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA
PLANNING COMMISSION
WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 4,2002
7:00 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY HALL
.
CALL TO ORDER
Chair Sand called the meeting to order at 7:05 p,m,
ROLL CALL
Present were Commissioners Ken Bezdicek, Terri Duchenes, Megan Ricke, Clayton
Zimmerman, and Chair David Sand,
Absent: Commissioner Cathy Smithknecht.
Also present were Council Member Beverly Aplikowski, Council Member Lois Rem,
Director of Community Services Aaron Parrish, City Planner Peter Hellegers, and
Recording Secretary Kathleen Altman,
APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON
NOVEMBER 6. 2002.
Commissioner Zimmerman requested the following changes: Page 2, first full paragraph .
change inherit to inherent. Page 4, 8th paragraph change considering to considered.
Commissioner Zimmerman moved, seconded by Commissioner Ricke to approve the
November 6,2002 minutes as amended. The motion carried unanimously (5-0),
PUBLIC HEARINGS
PLANNING CASE #02-32 - TRAMM BUILDERS AND REALTORS. 3585 LEXINGTON
AVENUE NORTH, MASTER AND FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
Chair Sand opened the public hearing at 7:06 p.m.
Staff stated applicants were requesting a Master and Final Planned Unit Development
approval to construct a six until office condo building at the corner of County Road E-2
and Cleveland Avenue, Staff reviewed their report dated November 26, 2002 and
recommended approval of the Master and Final Plauned Unit Development subject to
conditions as outlined in their report.
There were no comments made for or against the Master and Final Planned Unit
Development.
Chair Sand closed the public hearing at 7:12 p,m.
.
Commissioner Zimmerman asked what was shake style siding.
.
.
.
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - DECEMBER 4, 2002
2
Tim Trarnm, Trarnm Builders & Realtors, stated it would be a maintenance free siding.
He stated they had picked out a particular shake type, maintcnance free siding. He
indicated it was a cross between a hardy board and regular siding. It was maintenance
free, but it was not vinyl. He noted it had a good texture and would look good. It was a
prefinished product.
Commissioner Zimmerman asked what type of a warranty was there for color fading.
Mr. Tramm replied they would not go with something dark, so they would not experience
that type of fading. He stated there was a no fade warranty on the material.
Commissioner Zimmerman asked what siding would be on the back of the building. Mr.
Tramm replied there was nobody looking at the backside, so he was suggesting some
other type of maintenance free materials. He noted the colors would all be coordinated.
He stated he would bring samples oftheir proposed materials to the Council meeting.
Commissioner Zimmerrilan asked for clarification on the parking, Mr. Hellegers replied
it was five feet from the right-of-way on Cleveland Avenue. He noted the parking would
not be right up against Cleveland Avenue.
Mr. Tramm noted the building had 15,136 square feet. He removed from that total 1,968
square feet for stairwells, restrooms, closets, furnish and mechanical rooms, etc. with an
actual lease able net square footage 13,168. He summarized for the Commission how he
figured the parking space requirements. He noted the back exits were for fire purposes
and they did not intend to have regular traffic in and out of those exits, He indicated
there would be six office tenants, one story with a basement. He noted under the 300
square foot rule, they were required to have 43.89 parking spaces, which they met.
However, if they used the 250 square foot rule, they would be short less than 1.5 spaces
per unit. He noted, however, this would not be a Class A building and the parking
requirements would be different than if this was a Class A building. He noted he had
tenants already interested in renting.
Chair Sand stated he liked the looks of the building, but was disappointed with the
landscaping. He noted this would be a gateway comer and he wanted this to be a special
building for Arden Hills. He noted there was no landscaping buffering the parking lot.
He stated staff was requesting additional landscaping and he agreed there should be
additional landscaping along Cleveland Avenue. He asked why were all ofthe pine trees
on the north side with none on the west. Mr. Trarnm replied they could shift some of the
pine trees to the west, or add additional pine trees on the west side.
Chuck Plowe, Plowe Engineering, stated they could shift the landscaping and work with
staff on that.
Commissioner Duchenes asked what was going to be from the road to the start of their
property line. Mr. Tramm replied it would be sod.
Commissioner Zimmerman asked if there would be enough room for a sidewalk along
Cleveland. Mr. Parrish replied the sidewalk would be in the County right-of-way, but
applicant would be responsible for it.
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - DECEMBER 4,2002
3
Commissioner Ricke asked if staff had received any comments from residents by phone .
or e-maiI.Mr. Hellegers replied they had one public comment from someone not present
at tonight's meeting indicating that Mr. Tramm's properties were not well maintained,
bnt it did not address this particular request.
Mr. Tramm asked what property was that resident referring to. Mr. Hellegers replied he
did not know specifically, but it was a property in Arden Hills.
Mr. Tramm noted it may not be a property they owned anymore and therefore, they
would not be responsible for the maintenance any longer.
Commissioner Bezdicek asked if they would review parking in the future, wouldn't they
needed a contingency plan in place in the event more parking was required. Mr. Tramm
stated there really was nowhere to add parking, He indicated the parking was exhausted
on the site.
Commissioner Bezdicek inquired further information regarding the parking. Mr. P]owe
stated 42 parking stalls were adequate for this type of development. He noted there
would be 7 1/3 parking stalls for each unit and this proven as adequate parking.
Chair Sand asked if they had any problems with carrying the cultured stone base around
the sides ofthe building. Mr. Tramm replied he had no objection to that.
Chair Sand asked if they had any problems with the ornamental lighting, instead of .
shoebox lighting, Mr. Tramm asked would that be in the parking lot or on the building.
Mr. Hellegers replied that would be in the parking Jot. Mr. Tramm stated he had no
objection to that.
Commissioner Duchenes noted if they wanted a monument sign in the future, would they
need to revise the PUD. Mr. Hellegers replied they did not have a requirement for
monument signs in that area, but they could add that as a condition if the Commission
wanted. He noted staff was recommending if a sign was placed on the property it be a
monument sign and not a pylon sign. They would need to apply for a signage permit
before a sign was put up,
Chair Sand moved, seconded by Commissioner Ricke to approve Planning Case #02-32,
ArdenRidge Master and Final PUD, County Road E-2 and Cleveland Avenue with the
following conditions and recommendations:
I.
2.
A revised landscaping plan shall be submitted to the City Planner for his approval.
The applicant shall submit a landscape performance bond or other surety for
125% of the cost of materials and installation valid one full year from the date of
installation.
All necessary building permits shall be filed with the City Building Official.
All fire prevention systems shall be approved by the Fire Inspector.
Lighting shall be ornamental style lighting and shall be submitted to the City
Planner for his approval.
A final utility plan shall be submitted to the City Engineer for his approval.
.
3.
4.
5.
6.
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - DECEMBER 4, 2002
4
. 7.
8.
9.
10.
II.
12.
13.
14.
IS,
16.
17.
18.
.
19.
Any new sanitary sewer line that connects to the line at the sonthwest corner of
the site be located three (3) feet above the existing line and then dropped in to
reach the existing line.
A final grading and drainage plan be submitted to the City Engineer for his
approval.
A detail stormwater management plan shall be submitted to the City Engineer for
his approval.
A masonry trash enclosure shall be provided using materials that match the
primary building.
The applicant shall provide the city with an easement for the lift station located at
the southwest corner of the site.
The applicant shall provide the city with a signage easement at the corner of
County Road E2 and Cleveland Avenue for a Gateway Sign.
The applicant shall provide and install sidewalks adjacent to the public right-of-
way along both the north and west side of the property.
The applicant shall provide a bicycle rack adjacent to the sidewalk along the front
of the building.
A PUD Permit and Development Agreement be approved by the City Council
prior to the issuance of a building permit.
The applicant obtains all necessary permits from Ramsey County.
Compliance with the applicable provisions ofthe Zoning Ordinance.
If necessary, further review of parking requirements be conducted within a six
month to one year period to determine if the estimated traffic and parking
required for the proposed building is consistent with the Building and
Professional Office use.
That any exterior signage not on the building be a monument style sign, reviewed
by staff and subject to the City's signage ordinance.
The motion carried unanimously (5-0).
PLANNING CASE #02-33 - MANUFACTURER'S SERVICES PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT
Chair Sand opened the public hearing at 7:50 p.m.
Staff stated applicant was requesting review of an amendment to a Planned Unit
Development to replace a 1,500-gallon nitrogen storage tank with a 13,OOO-gallon
nitrogen storage tank and the accompanying vaporizers. Staff reviewed their report dated
25, 2002 and recommended approval of the Planned Unit Development Amendment
subject to conditions as ontlined in their report.
Mike Buseman, Manufacturers' Services, stated this situation had arisen due to the
economic situation.
.
Commissioncr Ricke asked how tall was the tank in relation to the building, Mr.
Buseman replied the tanks would be 2-3 feet short of the building wall. He noted the
horizontal tank would be less intrusive and not above the elevation of the building.
Commissioner Zimmerman thanked applicant for adding the additional screening. He
noted the only thing that would not be screened was the seven feet of the top of the
.
>~
.-; (C
o..:::S
(C ?O
:::s ......
~&-
...... (C
~
ti;""O
'"~ S
...... 0
:::s (C
:::s CO
(C ~
rf.J ......
o ~
l""'l-o..
~ ......
:::s
(JQ
.
.
.
.
/f\
~
EN HILLS
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
Agenda Item 6.E
December 12,2002
TO:
Mayor and City Council
Joe Lynch, City Administrator
Peter Hellegers, City Planne@
Planning Case #02-33, Manufacturer's Services; Planned Unit
Development Amendment; 4300 Round Lake Road
FROM:
SUBJECT:
ENCLOSURES:
I. November 25, 2002 Planning Commission Memo with attachments
2. Planning Commission Meeting Minute excerpt
Request
The applicant is requesting review of an amendment to a Planned Unit Development to replace a
1,500 gallon nitrogen storage tank with a 13,000 gallon nitrogen storage tank and the
accompanying vaporizers.
Planninl! Commission Recommendation
The Planning Commission is recommending approval of Planning Case #02-33, Manufacturer's
Services, 4300 Round Lake Road, Planned Unit Development Amendment with the following
conditions:
I, The current screening enclosure shall be extended to enclose the area of the proposed
13,000"gallon nitrogen storage tank and the entire screening enclosure shall also
extend vertically (from 16') to the top of the vaporizer (23') to conceal the equipment
from direct view.
Page 2 of2
December 12, 2002
Planning Case #02-33
Deadline for Al!encv Actions
The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on November 8,
2002. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statue, the city must act on this request by January 7,2003
(60 days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60 day
review period. The city may with the petitioner's consent extend the review period beyond the
120 days.
Ontions
I. Reconnnend approval as submitted,
2. Recommend approval with conditions.
3. Reconnnend denial. If the City denies the petitioners request, "...it must state in writing
the reasons for the denial at the time that it denies the request",
4. Table for additional information,
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
~
~~HILLS
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
November 25, 2002
TO: Planning Commission
PC Agenda Item 3.B
FROM: Peter Hellegers, City Planner
SUBJECT: Case #02-33
Manufacturer's Services
Planned Unit Development Amendment
Request
The applicant is requesting review of an amendment to a Planned Unit Development to
replace a 1,500 gallon nitrogen storage tank with a 13,000 gallon nitrogen storage tank
and the accompanying vaporizers.
Overview
Surrounding Area
Industrial G-E: Gateway Business Light Industrial
Industrial G-E: Gateway Business Light Industrial
N.A. (Round Lake) NA (Round Lake) N.A. (Round Lake)
N.A. (New Brighton) NA (New Brighton) N.A. (New Brighton)
North
South
East
West
Site Data
Industrial
Light Industrial
G-B: Gateway Business
I I A5 Acres (498,690 sqillITe feet)
Relatively flat
Memo to Planning Commission
Planning Case #02-33
Page 2 of 4
.
Background
The applicant, Manufacturer's Services, first contacted the City regarding the expansion
oftheir nitrogen tanks in October. They have been located at 4300 Round Lake Road
since August of 1997, as stated in their letter (Attachment I). As a contract manufacturer
of electronic printed circuit boards, Manufacturer's Services uses liquid and gaseous
nitrogen to process these boards. The applicant is now seeking to more than double their
nitrogen capacity in order to meet the demands of their customers' requirements.
The City has reviewed the following requests for this property:
Planning Request Address CC Action
Case
96-12 Site Plan 4300 Round Lake Road 7/2/1996 (A)
ReviewN arianceIV acation
97-23 Site Plan Amendment 4300 Round Lake Road 9/29/1997 (A)
(location of wall sign)
00-40 PUD Amendment (dumpster) 4300 Round Lake Road 1/8/200 I (A)
Zonin!! Review
.
1. Screening
The Arden Hills Zoning Ordinance States in Section VI, E, 4, I (Screening of Mechanical
and Operating Equipment):
Screening shall also be provided where mechanical operating equipment is
located on the ground or on the roof of the premises; such screening shall be
constructed and located so as to prevent direct view of said equipment.
Mechanical operating equipment shall include all exterior devices used to service
the building or its occupants, including but not limited to the electrical, HVAC,
plumbing, communications (including telephone and dish antennae) and storage
tanks.
Currently, there are nitrogen storage tanks of 3,000 and 1,500 gallons and a vaporizer
which are enclosed in a screening of chain link fence with cream/beige colored slats
(Attachment 3). The applicant is proposing to remove the 1,500 gallon tank, site the
3,000 gallon tank in the place of the 1,500 gallon tank, place a new 23-foot high
vaporizer in the place of the 3,000 gallon tank, and place a new horizontal 13,000 gallon
tank to the south of the current tank and vaporizer. The new nitrogen storage tank would
be placed on a concrete slab and would be contained inside an extended screening
enclosure,
.
.
.
.
Memo to Planning Commission
Planning Case #02-33
Page 3 of 4
As the new vaporizer will be 23 feet high (approximately the same height as the building)
and the current screening enclosure is 16 feet high, staff rccommends that the enclosure
also be extended vertically to prevent direct view of the vaporizer.
The Arden Hills Zoning Ordinance also allows the height of screening fences and
enclosures to extend above what usually would be allowed without requiring the proof of
hardship required for a variance (Section 6, E, 4, m: Fences in Non-Residential
Situations and Exceptional and Unusual Circumstances in Residential Districts):
Deviation from these requirements for fences, walls and landscape screening may
be permitted after planning commission review and council approval; of a site
plan with documentation showing the unusual circumstancesjustifjling the
proposed deviation and plans for the proposed fence, wall or landscape
screening. This provision is intended to allow flexibility in meeting the purpose
and intent of this paragraph 4 without the necessity of proving a hardship as is
required in the variance procedure, The objective of this provision is to improve
the livability, appearance and security of properties and their relationships to one
another.
In this instance, permitting the applicant to vary from the height requirements would
allow the storage tanks and the vaporizer to be completely screen from view,
Furthermore, the additional screening would not negatively impact any neighboring
residential property. Currently there are no residential properties remotely close to the
applicant's property; however, plans for the gateway business area have contemplated
office and residential uses. The additional height of screening could be beneficial in that
it would prevent direct view ofthe vaporizer from any of these potential future uses in the
Gateway District.
Deadline forA!!encv Actions
The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on November
8,2002. Pursnant to Minnesota State Statue, the city must act on this request by January
7,2003 (60 days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an
additional 60 day review period. The city may with the petitioner's consent extend the
review period beyond the 120 days.
Options
1.
2.
3.
Recommend approval as submitted.
Recommend approval with conditions.
Recommend denial. If the City denies the petitioner's request, ".,. it must
state in writing the reasons for the denial at the time that it denies the request".
Table for additional information.
4.
Memo to Planning Commission
Planning Case #02-33
Page 4 of 4
.
Recommendation
In Planning Case #02-33, staff recommends that the application for an Amendment to the
Planned Unit Development be approved subject to the following conditions:
1. The current screening enclosure shall be extended to enclose the area of the
proposed 13,000 gallon nitrogen storage tank and the entire screening
enclosure shall also extend vertically (from 16') to the top ofthe vaporizer
(23') to conceal the equipment from direct view.
Attachments
1.
2,
Statement submitted by the applicant.
Acknowledgement from the property owner's management agent authorizing
the application.
November 24,2002 letter from by Mike Buseman, Manufacturer's Services,
Photographs of the site submitted by the applicant.
Photographs ofthe site from a previous application.
Photographs ofPraxair storage tanks and vaporizers at other locations.
Plans for the proposed storage tank.
Location Map.
.
3.
4.
5,
6.
7.
8.
.
.
.
.
~
??Ji
MANUFACTURERS'
SERVICES
October 30, 2002
City of Arden Hills
1245 West Highway 96
Arden Hills, MN 55112-5794
Dear City Officials:
Manufacturers' Services moved to 4300 Round lake Road in August of 1997. /iJ that time two above
ground Nitrogen tanks were installed on the southwest side of our facility. One for Liquid Nitrogen and
the other for Gaseous Nitrogen.
We are a contract Manufacturer of electronic printed circuit boards. Our Customer base changes quite
frequently. A most recent customer's requirements will double both our liquid and gaseous Nitrogen
usage to process their boards. This will constitute an increase in both liquid and gaseous nitrogen. To
accommodate this Manufacturers' SelVices is proposing:
1 . Removing our smaller 1, 500 gallon tank from our s~e, (Picture #1 )
2. Moving our larger 3,000 gallon tank to the spot that smaller tank was located.
3. Installing a horizontal 13,000-gallon tank in front of the 3,OOO-gallon tank and vaporizers. This
will allow us to have larger volumes of liquid/gas nitrogen delivered less frequenOy to our site.
We have chosen a horizontal tank over a vertical tank, as the vertical tank would tower over
the height of the building. The vaporizers are 23 feet high. The current screening is 16' high.
Screening will extend around the new area.
This last year deliveries have occurred 2.79 per week. Our expected usage will double once we are in
full production. If a larger tanks is not installed our deliveries would be daily with some 2-3 times per
day.
We appreciate the working relationship with the City of Arden Hills. We believe this proposed
opportunity solution will blend with the building and the surroundings. We would like to start this project
before the severe weather season. Please let us know off any steps we can take to support this
approval process.
..~~
Suzanne Compton
Facilities SupelVisor
lI1ANUFACTVRERS' SERVICES
CENTRAL U. S. OPERATIONS, INC.
4300 ROUND LAKE ROAD
ARDEN HILLS, MINNE'_<;OTA USA
55tl2
651.604_2400
fAx: 6S t .604.2420
_11107/2002 13:01
512-837-8402
UP CENT PROP MGMT
-'-'~'_'..!.:::::."'VA\I..:I.nJ .:lIr,.J;'lif J'V~~
p.o:o::: 0::
~003
.
Oescriptlon of Request (el$o incllJ<le a 'etter"xplelned the project:
Tn~~~ll r~~ tn nol~ nQ~ 11~nnn gAl1nh t~n~
2, Ramo"e our
smaller 1,500 callan tank
gallon tank to space that
from site.
3, Move 3,000
1,500 gallon tank:sat.
4. [nstall fiortzontal 13.000 qallon tank in front of 3,000 callon tank. VeDorizors
will be Installed liehfnd the B.COO gallon tan\:.
,
5. Screen snace ~itf1 16.screeninq,
FlIIoR RequIrements and Payment of Fees
The City requeals that you make a pm-application meeting with the City Planner 10 discuss tho
eppl\callon process, requirements and deadlines, The undftfSlgned acknowtedll"" thaI she/ne
underatands thai before thIs request can be considered. an required information and fees ClnC!uding all
deposits) mU<lt be paid to lhe City in advance. If additional feas are required to cover costs Incurred by
the City. the City Plaooer has the light to requlraaddltional payment from one or more of /he
undersigned, who shall be lolntlyltabk> lor such fees. Such expenses may Include (but are not limited to)
direct city payroll end overileed cosls. fees paid to coosuKan\s and other profe&!l1onals. and the cost 0'
",/nUng, mall/ng and supplies. The CIty may withhold final action on e land use application and/or rescind
prior action unbl ell mIsceIleneous fees have been pald. Appllcaots are advised that an escrOW deposK is
required lit the time of \he submittal of the Land Use Appficatlon to offeet costs essociated with the
proposed project.
.
Required Submittallnfonnatlon
The City 01 Arden Hills require. the submittal of e certlfied land survey lII1d site plsn(s) for all development
projects In the City. True and accurate representatIon of the ,equlremants outlined In thG procedural
form for the specified type of request Is the rasponslbillty of the applicant. The City r"'luires flv.
(5) Ia'lie acale coplas, folded In sets.no larger then 8 y,,- x 14' with the print side facing out plus fifty (SO)
copies of 11' x 1 r reduclions of all plans. Mailing labals of all properties within 350 fast of the
property are required wtth this applicallon. ThIs Informa\lon may be obtained from Ram""yCounly,
Complataflncomplete APDllcatlons
An Incomplete application wll "alay the processing of land use requests, The appllcaijon approval time
commences and an application Is considered ofllclally flied when the City Planner has received and
. examined the epplication and determined thetthe application i& conljllele. The <leclalon whell1er tile
application is complele or incomplete shall be made wKhln ten (10) business days following the submlllaf
of the application. Whel1 the appllcallon Is deemed to be "complete. it shall be placed on the agenda of
tha fj",t pOSSible Planning Commission meeting orourring at le9&t thirty (30) daysirom the date of of1lclal
submission of the application.
Page 2 of]
.
11/07,/2002 13:01
512-837-8402
UP CENT PROP M~lT
-~..". ':"J."'I'C.L\.~ ;,.t:.<<" 1<..:":;S
PAGE 04
~004
. Notice of MeetinG Attendance
In order for the Planning Commission and the C~y Council 10 c:onsider any applicallon, the applicant or a
designated representative must be present atllle scl1edullld meellng. If not, the matter will be tabled until
the next available agenda.
Attend. Deadline and MeetInG Schedule
The deadline for submlUal of lend u.... applications Is required according to the scl1edule oullined below,
There ere no "x,ceptJonll. All Planning Commission meetings are held on tl1e first Wednesday of eecl1
month at 7:30 PM. cny Coundl. meetings are held the lest Monday of the same month at 7;30 PM.
Meallngs are held In tha Council Chambers at the ClIy of Arden HIlls, 1245 West Highway 98, Arden HIlls,
Minnesota 55112, unless otherwise sleled. Applicants are advised that additional meetings and/or
Wotkshops are scheduled when necessary upon approval of the Planning Commission.
.
TENTATIVE TENTATIVE
PLANNING CITY COUNCil
APPLICATION COMMISSION MEETING
DEADLINE MEETING DATE
DATE (Generally held on (Genertltty held on
(Mondav)' 1" Wednesdavat7:30 p.m.) last Mondav at 7;30 p.m.!
December 3 : JanuarJ,,9. ;.:; , . ' . Aanuarv28
January 7 February 6 F ebruarv 25
Februarv 4 March 6 .. ,. .. .. Maim 25
March 4 Allr. 3 Annl29
Aorll1 'MaV1 ., .. , > , Mav28
Mav6 June 5 June 24
June S Julv10 '. julY 29 '
J~lv 1 Auaust 7 Auoust26
AUgustS Der4 m ' Sentember 30 '
September 9 October 2 Oc:obet- 28
October 7 I NOl{~ber 6 ,. November 25 .
November 4 , December 4 Oecember 30
2002 SCHEDULE
AcknowledQ8ment and SIgnature
I acl<nowledge thetl have read all of the InlormaliOl1listed in the City of Arden Hills Land Use Application
and fully understand lI1at I am responsible fo( aU cost. incurred by the City related to ltle processing of
this application,
{;~l)'l..', I f~ ,,,,,","'/v\~ rJ.6~
P ev.ner tF' ~ 11(.LG
X 11/1/0'/ _
Date
Please COI1tacll!le CIty Planner at (661) 634-5120 il you have any questions regarding ',lOut 2pprocatlon.
.
Page 3 of3
~'
MANUFACTURERS'
SERVICES
.
Noveml,,:r 24, 2002
Mr. Peter Hellegers
City Planner
City of Arden Hills
1245 West Highway 96
ArdenHills,MN 55112-5794
Re: Details on PUD Amendment Application (Planning Case #02-33)
Dear Mr. Hellegers,
I am writing as a follow up to some of the correspondence that our Safety and Building Officer, Sue Compton, bas been
having with you regarding the PUD amendment application (Planning Case #02-33) that Manufacturers' Services bas
filed with the City of Arden Hills. As a quick introduction, I am the Site General Manager in Arden Hills and work
directly with Sue on an ongoing basis.
My interest today is in providing some background to the work we are doing and the reason for our request to the city.
Most specifically, I want to make certain we are doing all we can do to present the needs driving our application and to
make certain we are fully prepared for the December 4 meeting with the Planning Commission. The timing on this
project is extremely critical to our company and to one of our customers.
Our company is an Electronic Manufacturing Service (EMS) provider. As a high level sllIIlJDar)', this means we provide
assembly and test services for many ditTerent electronic companies. Our customers include companies such as
Rockwell, Honeywell, and PALM. We currently employ over 500 associates in our Arden Hills facility and have been
abte to mainlain our employment levels and operations in spite of the extreme competition in our marketplace. The
main reason for our site's stability bas been our flexibility and ability to accommodate changing customer
requirements.
.
This is the crux of our current situation. One of our potential key customers in the coming year has created a significant
increase in the volwnes of Nitrogen that we use in the assembly operations. This customer came to us from another
U.S. operation which was not able to operate profitably in the current economic environment The increased volume
from this customer is not only expensive to produce using CWTent equipment, but has significantly increased the
frequency of nitrogen delivery (now nmning at every 16 hours). ill addition, we are nmning on the ragged edge of the
current delivery capabilities of the system and are experiencing manufacturing shut-downs on a daily hasis. Our
customer's demands are projected to increase steadily in the next few months, We will not be able to meet these
demands with the current equipment
The summary of our situation is that if we don't successfully complete this project we stand a very real chance of
losing this customer and the associated jobs. 'The risk of losing this customer and 80 associated jobs is very real. If we
are not able to produce to their schedule they will not wait long to move the business elsewhere. We are very proud of
our site's success and our ability to keep a stable manufacturing base. Again, I want to make certain we are doing
everything in om power to represent omselves and our situation.
MANUFACTURERS' SERVICES
CENTRAL US. OPERATIONS, INC.
4300 ROUND lAKE RoAD
ARDEN HILLS, MINNESCIT^ USA
55112
.
651.604.2400
FAX: 651.604_2420
.
.
.
uun~
~
MANUFACTURERS'
SERVICES
I would sincerely appreciate the opportunity to meet with you in advance of the Planning Commission meeting. I can
be available at your convenience and extend an invitation for you to visit our site. I am also more than willing to meet
with you at your location, We certainly lUlderstand the interests of the City in assuring that fucility changes such as the
one we are proposing meet their standards and are willing to meet those standards. However, it is important in this
situation that we move as quickly as possible since a delay of even one month will quite probably result in this
opportunity slipping away.
1banks for your time and I look forward to continuing our relationship with the City of Arden Hills.
Sincerely.
Mike Buseman
General Manager and VP Operations
Manufacturers' Services
Cenlral US Operations
4300 Round Lake Rd.
ArdenHills,MN 55112
Work Phone
Cen Phone
651.604.2576
651.248.8021
MANUFACTURERS' SERVICES
CENTRAL liS. OPERATIONS, INC.
4300 ROUND LAKE ROAD
ARDEN H1LlS, MINNESOTA USA
55112
651.604.2400
FAX: 65L6042420
--.---------- -------- .
~
..c
......,
::J .
0 ......,
Ul 0
Ul Ol
OJ
e
u
.-
.- ~
>
I...
I...
(]J CO
0. .
(./)
.... \I-
Ul 0
I...
(]J -0
I... e
::J
OJ
......,
u ......,
~ (.f)
OJ
::J ~
e
CO
~ .
.---...".-".'
---.--
en
c .
.- 0
~.......,
0-0
..cc
(J') Q)
(J')><
~ Q)
.-
>-0
1-
· Q) ::J
(f)o
, ~
(J')
1--0
~ CO
::Jo..
UQ)
CO 1-
~Q)
::J..c
c ~
. CO
:E
,(J) .
(]J+-J
U (J)
-- co
2: (]J
(]J0l
(J)c:
--
(J) U
Qj~
J-.
::301
+-Jc:
U __
CO c:
~(]J
::3 (]J
c: J-.
CO U
~(J)
.
.
.
,T BY: PAAXAIA;
.
.
.
219 391 5195;
TRACKER Utility Installation
Specifications
The TRACKER uBit wUl require a dedicated powu
aDd telephObf; .semce enr Its opel'atl()n. A description of
the .requi~r'lts along with wire specifiea.tiol13 are lisred to
the right. Th(: power supply .and phon<: service rigid
conduits ate to be run to a previously identified location at
the tank foundatio11 perimeter. An ON/OFF switch sbsU be
wed as the tennination point fOf the power supply. Thil>
sv.itch will enable:: Praxair technicians to perform
maintenanee work. safely_
InstoJlation of tho pOwer and """Phono ,upply mu,t aclh"",
to National Eloctrical Code requirements and a.pplic.a.blc local
ordinanCClJ. Cable and conduit runs should be:; as di~t as
possible with a minimum of splice joints. Telephone eablc:
mUSt oot be installed in trays or conduit shared with electrical
power delivery cable. Pra"ait will complete the po\l\let and
tc1c:phonc: supply installation from the conduit tcrmtrtlltion
points into the TRACKER.
--~-------
Utility Details
2-
4
>,
, ,
OCT~29.02 12:57;
PAGE 2
Mar ll;:::iting the power 5t.1pply for propor voltage, deactivate:
the circwt and <::lcctril::ally i03Utatc and secure from physical
dall1lgc- T,est the phone SCl"Viec for strong dial tone and the
ability to pla~ lU'\d r~ivc telephone caUs at the TRACKER
unit end of dle cable. The hardware spedfications,and
installation guideline,; arc: included ill the "Utility Details"
dtflwing below.
I'OWE\l. SUI'I'L Y; Nl4 ^ WG. 3 ",,"ductor, Iy"" THWN
wi.. (15 amp drcuit). 120V AC
TELEPHONE SERVICE:T,.;oted pair, two-pair ..blo
minimum (I opa.. pair), 22g1lugo solid cop""r wire. I've
insulated conduclol'$ c:otor coded 1:0 Telephone industry
Standards with ~ble sheath pcr :!lite environment Aod $hielding
as rc;ql,li-red. Cable:: Must mCl;t Of exceed mtJulated Cable
Engit\ee~s As1soc. standard 8-80-5'76. Cable must be CB.pabk
of canying Levell modulated analog data. The Sel"Vlce ptu-st
b< DID (Direct Inward Dialing).
\Jliiilyd...q
lOCA liON OF uTILITY Tl;:RMINA lION PIS. WILL
BE IDENTIFIED IN fOUND.A.JION ORwC PACJ<AGE
sUPPLIED 10 CUSTOMER BY pRA)l:A1R
tbo~.on ~"""h....... _..:t~$::or,,"hy
~l' qolll.1ifl1!ld ponoand lit ~ dd<<ctioo.-nd ml:. All.
b~tl!od.nieaIinf~oXl!Od('ClQOlOR1~
~hCfqin..., w.-t on _IK>II dllta whid1 wo be~
to~"ti.hl.... butth6 IIl;t;;UI'IIo:Y<>I" tlo.XDplet'-MM thfilHlr... 00(
~_tdoo~yr)("IY'kU:\disma&ciwidt~
_l<>,
-
1. Cus\~mt!r SI.Ipplfl3Q;
Oual 90"'] lltlJ:. 1}'2- NPJ CcOf\f\nc.-;tion
~ed D,,1 j'R21HJI.. Cover. Red Dol IR2CCTGf'S&,
9:~q(. l"Qle ~.,.;t("li Qnd 15;" CFI d\,.opll!:lt pov<~
l'eceplac;le. 1/2. THD M 1/2- Liquidlight
Q\,Itlet e...."t\. 5~aI c:oon~ctiQ[1 Vl"it1\
oI1l<<tr'"oCQI tape. Ptiu.ol( tn compll!'te
rvn ...to mACKe~ I(<;)(n outlet connecliQI\
2. CUIlilQrfler supplied:
Rigid 1/2- .cOflduit with \I!I~"OM cc~lt!
( 2 pro min.) lQfTflingtin<t ~\tl IJ 1/2 fPT
coupling &: 1/2u~Ph.1/2 t..iQUiotiq-,t ~~f\n.
Leave 4.1). utr(l loI1nqlk (0( (1JIl r.nmplt!'tlon by
pHll{Qir $eol GOJUl. ../e1e<lri<:;gJ tope
3. Customer supptiE'd;
Rigid 1/2- conduit wilh 3 ",ire. IlOY. 15/10
powe-r ~OOofC. termirtdl~d inln butl1
duple_ r ece-ptoc!e QM !:;Vt'itch
4. 1.l1lUi-trm~ irt'ltolllltior'l'l OI1tV
Cu~to(T\er :;upplled:
Riqid 112- I;o"duit ...ith ~ 1/'Z- rPT o;~l'p'jin'J
&: 1/'1 MPh:I/2- liqo.Jidtlgh.1 cO"""MdIOf' on
~Qt;h ~....d. Leo"(' (I pull cord iMide 1l1e
cooduit 10 f(lcil,\ale the trQn~;lh:< ~Qble
(un Uuu I~e C"O<'Id\/H by p(O~o'r
Seal both oCOf"Ioedil)f>:s; wlelectriCQt tape-.
t::I..Qlt; If If<lMn'liHcr coble conduit .1.!fmiMle:;
;.., 0 Cla9,st Oi\l2 oreO, if\stG~ Q 1/2 s~r)I'OH
ApplelDll jEYS,11. end 1/2- Male l"';(r(l.App~lO<1
IUNY~. 0<\100 (he condui~ tMt ~l'Id'5 iro..ide
tit.!" eh:l5-9i1ied ur<!<:I. Seed .:.of\t\ yo!cl...d.i.co! top~.
PI13lfQk t(l PQt:k :!<MlOff
.Of l;I uivelenf
P~iat.tndamarlr;:Q{
f'r6xeifT~otY. 1n<I.
Copynpu 199'1.
l'ra:<Ai.tT~.1N;.
~fUC.PI'T
P..:slftJ Y21/99
C l{/~
.
,1:t1f1 r!~~J!x
.
V 1'5/'0
.
Chrit i 4~,'11
.
c (P{ ~
.
7~Al~1 t?77'
;J;{?~1t ~ .
~#!:<td, - "~<~.("
G 1-/fJ
.
.
iim
t'-I
/
-f..t:vd <(.L.{.~ic
{/tFhy/'ci!''/iJ.l
Page] of2
file:l/C:\Documents and Settings\scompton\Local Settings\Temporary Intern..,\Dsc00262.jp 11119/2002
.
.
.
Page 1 of I
.
.
.
file:lIC:\Documents and Settings\scompton\Local Settings\ Temporary Intern.. .\Dsc00261.jp 11/1912002
Page I of1
file:l/C:\Documents and Settings\scompton\Local Settings\Temporary Intern...\Dsc00265.jp 11/19/2002
.
.
.
l'age I or 1.
.
file://C:\Documents and Settings\scompton\Local Settings\Temporaiy Intem...\Dsc00263.jp 11/19/2002
.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r~ !I ~ ~
~.........~~g~ ~~......~~ ~p-~--..~~
<Il ~ ~ ~ $I; ll.' ll.' "- it it 1r ll.' '!? ? I,-{ ": 1? a c <:>
15 <0 !
z~ ! ~ ~~I !~
...:j ~~ ~ ~ s ::; g:i
~ ~~ ~-~ ~ ~ ~< --~~
~ ~~<.>~8'" ~:\: ~ ~:i1:i1Sl O".;j, g~~
~ ~i~~;~!i ~~Q~ ~~~~~i~i :~~
<i ~ .~...~~<> I It,<~ !Q!!ilQl<i~\.)~ <.>~<>
... m~&'&!<>"-f~i ~~-~'t't't'j'Xt'Z.;g~~
..... a~I"-~:!:';;-l ~~ ,............<~... '"
o ~ ~~~~~~~tt~ ~~~~~~.~~l~~;.
~ ~... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ <; ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ". ~ ~ ~i~ ~
~ ~~~~g~<i~~~~n~~~~~~~~~I:<~
;rl ~\Sl:>..."'...>:...."'a~ii'l~~~ .~'" ..."'.~ui
~~~~g~~~~~~~i~~~~~~~~~;~
/'
~-;I.
z :>.
,j I:\::
~~ 1; ~~
'" ~..J
'" 1:\::\-\
<C UJI
I:\::z
. ::JUi
o \-Q
~ ~I:\::
:( \L<l:
X ~ ~
<{ <tG
l[.i'IL~
H ~
g
II
\
-;.:
:;:; ill
~lS"'
~....<>
z....
<>ill
cl~~
!ll~&
~~~
.!ll .
':J:-~"""'"
~~~~
...<.......
I-.uill
c;i"'S'!g
...'l':f~
~Q8(jl
"'5 '"
",,,,&:;;1
"'. ~
~a~r
-''''I:~
"... <:>-,
U"'tll
~........."'-~
~~~~
z)oll!'"
'" '"
Cll:E.O~
\-!:)-a:l
.)0 x
~fi'l8~
1-....<>
~::'i~l::;
<iI->....
~\-c...~
~a.1l...f/\
CLO'OO
C "-
-I"'~'"
-<>-\-0..
~~.!i'~
i'S>>l~1i
:6:=>..t..tI\
.
.
.
f
.
.
Ii
.'.'.~'~''',
ln~g
l!~~~
~ ~ ~ ~ ;a ~ :i ~ :i ~ :i :i :i ~ ~ ~ 2 ~ ~:i 1.j~ ~:ti ~
1lI",,,,,,,,,,-~,,,
~ ...<:><:><:>c<><> <:> "''''~~~~~ -1!:2 <>
(;J - - I j
, ,
I I
r I '
\Ii - ~ CO) "t' ~ \0 r--.. ll) G" S'! ~ t:! tl X ~ ~ t:: ~ st ~!<':; ~:~ (t ~
to ! '
~~ ~ I~~
~~~ ~ ~ ~
;..:"~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~
f ~ )..~ l;;..,~<.>
~. t ~~ ~ ~~~~3 :c:'<~
~ ~i~"~ ~~ ~ ~~~~~ i~~
~ ~ -J'~~~ ~~ ~ ~~~~~ ~~~
~~rg;>;~ ~~ ~ ~~~'" ~"'~
IS l'!C~~~ 'f;),~. ~ ~~:n~~ ~~~
~~~~!Q "<:li~ lQ "'''tlJ~ "l!l(1'
lS..r,,<&l~ ~~~ ~ ..~9~~~ ~~~
...'" "It ~ -J ~ ..J;""'~~!f
~ ~~ ~ ~~~ '" ~ ~~ ~~
....
"'~~~ ~ ~ ~'JI
~~'" <> I,):IlJi ~ llS
<;\!/i';~~~ '<~~" G~ >-
~~~~~ ~~Jj ~~ ~'f;),~
"" '
'" ;;;-
::;.
\...
-
Sft; 3~Vd
~LS:~~ ~O-6~-lJO
~ '
~~ ~ 9
'<t:i !.i .... <;) ~l\> @ Co as
.,~ ~~ " -J ~ '" ;t!~ "" ;!:! ""
~~ ~~~ ~;~ ~ ~i ~!i~! ~ ~ ! ~~
"<~ "i'~Ci ~!;l1S ll!'...'" lIsQ(",~~ ~::llii >" '
...~ . ~'&; ; ~~ ;::' ~~ ~~~~I'; ~ ~,~~ ~~
~~",,;g ij}~t ~ !~Ci ~ \j~ ~';;''j;i~~ ~ l'.'.!l:!~ l;lj~
~ ~ ",,,,:g '" ~~:::l illtl;!">1l' ~ <i\lQ >-,i; lll'"
~ ~~~ ~ '" ~ ~-: &1~~~ ~~ ~ >-~
I';~~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~:n~ ~~ ~~
~~~ ~~.... ~ %~ :!! ;i"" <>. ::':a ti~ ~'Jc ~s
~~~ ~~~ <>. ll!~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~>- ~~ ~~
",<l:>- !:>l':I >- 15 ~ Ci \...0; I'; ..", "'~ ":0. )Ii
"'~~ >""\,,, ~ <1:<rl!l'l;"!II Y\<l. \>(::1: -';0: ....,
~ibll! ~*~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~:!! ~~
~~~ ~~~ ~ t3~% ~~ ~~"" ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~
~~~ ~~~ '" ~~~ ~~ ~~~ ~ 2~ ~~ ~~ ~~
~ ~ ~~ ii} ~ ~ ~ ~ ::; ~u...
- - ~ ~ .:t
.
.
.
~
.
..
w
w:;:!!
~i~
~,..~
..~u
i_
~
-
~S6~S ~6t; 6~~
!HIVXVHd :AS lN3~
z
Q~
~~
~~
:ll:ll
~~
>lot";
~~~
.l.i~~
\-~'"
~,.k
'" Z
~ ~L
; ~~ '
-\l).j
~\4
lilT
\rZ
::JW
Q '\-a.
z '0~
<<(
~ \L
4: :J
X ~ Z"
4: <u
~ ir I L~
"'l
~~
.~~
~
~
<:>
I-
~
~..
~
I
'"
'"
'"
It
'"
Ol
<
U.
e
"'<i
~C
~l>
~~i
~3~
a
>
~ii~ ll!&
~
~
~
~
,0 .~ ..
.0
tv 0 '-> 0 ..
<.> ~
,.
<:> 'r <:>
~ Q '"
:;.~ ..
0 '!i!n. 0
"
~ :<......=1
,
~
1>
,,><"
I-~
~:
'->~
"'"
e<
'l)'"
><
'"
~b
I
"'I:>
\-:l!;
I-
Sf
I-
o
z
"
3
'"
<(
Cl.
lD
~
u
<:>
I
J..
'"
,
'UT""Y'li'U..J : l a
'n.........".
'.-Cl.....
II\I:::J"
,--1..... ...................
t.:::C" ,::: 17
"""'^ ""..,,- ,..........
..
Ii
~
S!
...
~
e;1e; 'lf1\1r1
.,
~g,,:~~ ~O.6~-.l:JO
il;
l-
· l1')
OOl..J
. o..-.l
-J <(
- Cl:: (J
:<l: lU V)
t--:o..O
~~~
C:::>
Q)
;;';';':'. -;:::;
.. . ~'-"'.'.
4 .. . .:..-..::-:
_~ i ;,'4 : \{:-
l5 \)
"').. .
~ ~~
\J\-1
1:1::\-\
WI
I:I::z
~ ~~
\)\'r:
~ ~~
~ 5 i
~ - ~ ~
~~rl2:~
.
. ~
~ ~
~ ~i
. ..
i e~"
&;~ ~d
r ;11
w
~'" '"
e;~ ;
'"
'"
'"
<'\
'"
lO
M
.
!l!
---1
---"l
'"
'"
Z
ill
~
<:)
CJl
~
z
- c5
~o
1('.1
~ :B~
<( ~>",
:;! l!::CJl2
~ '"~~s:
'" D
<:> <!
~ ~
l:'l :>l
... Z
~ ;:::
~
"
!:!
o
... ...
~ ?(
.. ..
'" ~
<.. ~
<J ::i
()
t:. ~
.. 0
,
. ;., ll:l
.. . - 01# :.:. I~
.. ,fCl<>.~
..
. s
,. . ~I~
. .. .. ..
.. --'
r . .. ill
<( l;l. ~ ~ :;;:
~ .. .
.. .
~ ~> CJl
~
'"
u z
<(
() ill
b --'
(J
:I:
I-
3=
":
to
~S6~S ~6t; 6~G
~~I~X~~d 'AS lN3S
!"'-.--
L~'I
~
i i-i ~
~ ~L 0
= . ~!iir! '(L"
. [ .[ m;f~ \_:1!..
I!!IJ --~ ~
~~ rn '., ! mll.r"
I!~II - -u ~. 0 I~ ; {;: I
8 I e!!Ier;;lo 1 0 .. ,::<:
L!J~ T> ~' ': ,.-'> ~ .~,. t;~
"'" " .' .' -1 ""C
rn I~'!~' 'I'I'~-:' o,;llI'!!' "~,~.~[]i <~~~
~ ..' '" J , ,,' ~ 'Iil' =- n"
F.iln: :.: 'I · I i 'I 1~3~ ~~~
W " · e"
__ ...........: j' . I '..1'1'1'"
~ . ' .Jm', j" ~l;l1'11
Cr '.lJ.\l . ::<:1
,_ m ,i111.~, '. Iiln L""'''
-'0 .~i~_1;; ~~~!.~ ~
~ . ISI" ~ID ..! i,-L~ b
~ iIo\ll.I_'it. ';lI' =.----' .~ ~
I::' J ~I!; Ji'" ~ I I!t .m' I: lrlr (/.)
,~n I 'irl!." . m~'. . . .~I
T t-,.U! . m. . . Ol. · <J
. I -!W' _"'71::8 l11I I~ '1
, yt'l ~ '! It W. -r- -4
'. FI ~Isil.
~!' _. r!!~ ~BI II II~ IE
,:.J ~l ! I e II If- ,~ ~ I
~ I ~~, .4. ~ Ia i
IEi..,ill < Uel-rEm --
. I ~ JL
II~Peo g <II
o 0 ~
a IIYI 0 g ,.J I
. ft · 8 ft. -illl
I .' '...1' J i' I: ll!+
II ~:rlll~o II [!I] m
'~'.'I? 'g ,}~~
I · ~ !/J cr~ l:-
i I'"
I ..," ~:' ;r-l'
'. "~ L ;3-JU...
a · ~ ~ ~ ~~
1 0
~ ," ,88
o [Iii! !:,:::,
I~i ~
mm I~r
lID '
!:
e
..,
c:
i:.,
...
!~n ~l
III
~~ ~ ,
~ll -;' _ - IT STAGING AREA
~'_ I ~ ,IT .. ~ I -fl'
'f ~ l! r; ~ ' " :,--=;::::;,;1
h .,,'y~ :=. -'
-IL' '1m ,_,._1
-:l'~ 'I -' '-. .... 'J." !' -r+...>d ~:""'IU.""'.' ''''''''''In.'
,I' 'I' ...J.......-.-I'~.' :G"
I I . '''.j 11UJHEtrl ,- \ -
I ' '.' r-X'" "",,,,,,-,lt1:
.....!.. .... JY""=l-----<(K...:'..
,...... .,
.
~
.
L -I
.
-r==
ru
-
I-
wen
'nnL-!
~. w;
~
~
~
Ul'-J . ,~
~
"
GJ
.. .
(J\
-
..-
.... :~
~A
~i
)1- r
.~,
1[;]
'...J 00 "
=
if
n
"",
lQ
i~
n
'"
~
CD
-'--
-
IJ)(,O
I
._ - 1;;;1
I I I I , f
;;...1.,.;;.1
I I I I
I I I I I
...,r:;:~ ..
(,~ ~
I I I I
I I I I 111I
J.' [I I I I I ~.
t-' I I =1
.-
. T
lilt 1!
b "Ii. ~
f ..J ~
..
~
o
.
i_
--'
~
~
....L II II .
.". I I I I I
o.:~ III I
~" ...,H-+- X
1_ 1-1-1;-1-1-1 ~
I I I I c:
_ '''::1::':=4 e
I I I I "
...J _ . I I :t:;:I::;J~
I I I ~
--:- r 1='=111I
I I I I
. I 1_ I I I
~
ru
-
=
~....L
W ....L
~po
'..,r:;: ~~
.:~ I
. ~ LTOol Crib
<.
"'l .....,
_ l~
~
~
....L
'" ~
I "" I
~"'f'~
I
II ~,
~
B
.
~ Ii
D iii. e:fJ.W.r rTl IFf M f.
_"_,, ~;~ =-.J W In -=. .
,II-""' II~
,.
~
a
I
,
I
,..
.
.
-
~o
1,
.
J>
/0
tj
f'1
Z
I
I---l
I
I
(/)
l>CI
</0
l>f'1
......f'1
j;:z
tJj
r(/)
f'l-o
J>
n
f'1
, I
, I
, ! , I
,
I , I
, , i
, , i
,
. I !
, ,
! i , I
NO, O...lC .. 'C>IlGJ_"",Pll;AC<'I'>lCJI<
, ,10,9, " ,~ .~ (........._t.I
.
.
----------
~
II
i
I
,
i
!
I
i
!
i
I
!
'-.UM', ,-- I it)' I
r ;-iF-P ~ ~ _.1 l ~:_ \
I ! i - i t[]f,;;;~;n-;;c~~~~~ri~~~~~~;~I;r..if-rr;:;-~~~,~~;n~r;~fT~':;:;'~\
) ;! ; '\
, : \
fJJ ,."i i~i ~ lTTi \.
li~ J., i"'-I ',1 t I '
~ !~:'~J)j. '.
'~i !~! i':;:~~I' "':'" '--..t~';";""-
't'" .. lJ I I~' .- I , 1
" '.' .~. Iljl
,1.1 :~! :!; :, I ,
:~i :~! '{'!'----l-
,'~i, ,".1 ; i jl .
~ '- ! ' : I I 1
! ~ i . ill I' ,...............;j~.A-"-:\
I~,I ;' ,I !! ~~ (C l\
! .:~ ! ~
I ' . Iii l""'~"'\\
I 'I ! I I: !,-\..\, /-
. I 1~~i4";::;~~-"" ~
J I ~t'""Jl,-~~ _.~::..-;=.-~.f-L ~J
i l J I I \... ,
r i : I I qrr~';--.
, ; l 1 I l:.t. II,
P*11 : i ,,' : 1:~ f; '-.
: t:~ 11
Ii: ~t
I Ii! : '8 t
1111,' i it
t " I....... .
'j i ,J Ll --.~. --r.-+----.-L
I ._t;""
l .'. 1 'I" , ..."",~---
~- --- - -r- \ ...J---I~""'---;---r-' ...~.-
--r-j \ !-"~)"'--I--'--:"'<----=------ <.
i' I \ I II 1.-.... ------
.... . I I I A-
i
i
I
,
i
i
i
t
i
i
i
,
i
;
i
,
,
:~~;(
~ ~.
: -.:: ""~ '"
L_____
~
"".
illl
~";;.l ~!3
__.-'V" .... / I I
~~-_-~ --::::r-.---1---r-------
i \~-"''7'' I i I
: \ -\ ',~~--',.-......
",: \ '
II !\-. I ."'.
'\ 1,111~-' :..' 'I
1 1...f:l!J .~
f \- I ~lt...... I
.,l \ : I~l :
"I Iti I
.tJ'i :
t "' I I
" "'1 '- ~
, , '
t .~
1 1'.
, ' '
I
I
I
. '
,
r/: ~ :(~
,.
If ~.:
"-( -..
, '
,
"
,
,
,
,
A
N
::::=
.
"
,
...
,-~-,.._"'..........
..............-,..,""'...,...--"
_tio<......~._..,
UI ".,...... iI..~......~
S.......'lHl
st..r.ooL_.~.u
td' ul_.~'~.n:z
f~o<: .1!_<l~._~1I
cnu. .,.~.ItIMC
""""DSCI.I't .oN::IUnCl'VlU:
un.'1ROf4Wlf'I"T-.L $I!JIVlICES
~f't...\M'<0'l(;
~
~~-
ll"'l~4IQ;"
----~
>. .
~
"'
::J
0
>.
Q)
2:
::J
(j)
'0
~
0
Z
Q
0 "'
0 2:
l[)
Q)
(5
z
o
o
o
l[)
.
C') III
C') tl 'C
1'- m
~1=C~
=It OIl OIl
GlUlS]
III III 'C III
lll'\-C...I
.. OIl OIl
-'-S'C
tJI ::I <( C
.: 'Z Q ~
C III a::
C!j::l
,!!!CQ"CI
Q"lll CI
== ;
c::
OQ.,
~CG
0:2
-'
I:.il
z
V':l
:s
.
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - DECEMBER 4, 2002
4
. 7.
8,
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16,
17.
18.
.
19.
Any new sanitary sewer line that connects to the line at the southwest corner of
the site be located three (3) feet above the existing line and then dropped in to
reach the existing line,
A final grading and drainage plan be submitted to the City Engineer for his
approval.
A detail stormwater management plan shall be submitted to the City Engineer for
his approval.
A masonry trash enclosure shall be provided using materials that match the
primary building.
The applicant shall provide the city with an easement for the lift station located at
the southwest corner of the site.
The applicant shall provide the city with a signage easement at the corner of
County Road E2 and Cleveland Avenue for a Gateway Sign.
The applicant shall provide and install sidewalks adjacent to the public right-of-
way along both the north and west side of the property.
The applicant shall provide a bicycle rack adjacent to the sidewalk along the front
ofthe building.
A PUD Permit and Development Agreement be approved by the City Council
prior to the issuance of a building permit.
The applicant obtains all necessary permits from Ramsey County.
Compliance with the applicable provisions ofthe Zoning Ordinance.
If necessary, further review of parking requirements be conducted within a six
month to one year period to determine if the estimated traffic and parking
required for the proposed building is consistent with the Building and
Professional Office use.
That any exterior signage not on the building be a monument style sign, reviewed
by staff and subject to the City's signage ordinance.
The motion carried unanimously (5-0).
PLANNING CASE #02-33 - MANUFACTURER'S SERVICES PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT
Chair Sand opened the public hearing at 7:50 p.m.
Staff stated applicant was requesting review of an amendment to a Planned Unit
Development to replace a 1,500-gallon nitrogen storage tank with a 13,OOO-gallon
nitrogen storage tank and the accompanying vaporizers. Staff reviewed their report dated
25, 2002 and recommended approval of the Planned Unit Development Amendment
subject to conditions as outlined in their report.
Mike Buseman, Manufacturers' Services, stated this situation had arisen due to the
economic situation.
.
Commissioner Ricke asked how tall was the tank in relation to the building. Mr.
Buseman replied the tanks would be 2-3 feet short of the building wall. He noted the
horizontal tank would be less intrusive and not above the elevation ofthe building.
Commissioner Zimmerman thanked applicant for adding the additional screening. He
noted the only thing that would not be screened was the seven feet of the top of the
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - DECEMBER 4, 2002
5
vaporizer. Mr, Buseman noted staff was recommending a full 23-foot fence. However, .
he indicated he had concerns about the stability of a 23-foot high fence.
There was no one present for or against the Special Use Permit request.
Chair Sand closed the public hearing at 8:02 p.m.
Commissioner Ricke moved, seconded by Chair Sand, to approve Planning Case #02-33,
Manufacturer's Services Planned Unit Development Amendment, subject to the
following conditions and recommendations:
1. The current screening enclosure shall be extended to enclose the area of the
proposed l3,000-gallon nitrogen storage tank and the entire screening
enclosure shall also extend vertically (from 16') to the top of the vaporizer
(23') to conceal the equipment from direct view.
The motion carried unanimously (5-0).
PLANNING CASE #02-34 - NORTH HEIGHTS CHURCH, SPECIAL USE PERMIT
Chair Sand opened the public hearing at 8:03 p.m.
Staff stated applicant was requesting review of a Special Use Permit to allow high school .
enrollment at the current North Heights Family Life Center on their Arden Hills Campus.
Staff reviewed their report dated November 21, 2002 and recommended approval of the
Special Use Permit subject conditions as outlined in their report.
Commissioner Duchenes asked if there would be a limit on the number of students, or a
time limit on this Special Use Permit. Mr. Hellegers replied the Commission could make
those recommendations if they wanted.
Dave Meissner, North Heights, noted the facility could handle more than 86 students, but
they did not anticipate anymore than 86 students at this time. He requested they not put a
time limit on this because it was unknown as to how many students they would have. He
stated it was their intent to eventually build the school in another location at a future date
ifthe need arose,
Commissioner Ricke asked how many staff would there be if there were 86 students.
Chris Glasow, North Heights, stated the school could be grades 7 through 12 and the 7th
and 8th grade teachers would help fill out the curriculum. Initially, there might be 56
students. He noted they did not anticipate the enrollment to grow quickly due to their
inability to provide certain services the students and parents wanted, such as a football
team.
Commissioner Zimmerman asked if they had State accreditation. Mr. Glasow replied it .
did, He noted the space requirements had been met under State guidelines.
Chair Sand inquired about the parking. Mr. Glasow stated the students did not start
driving until their sophomore year and from prior experience, most of the students
carpooled, so he did not anticipate there would be any parking or traffic problems. He
,
.
.
.
~
~
EN HILLS
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
6.F
December 10, 2002
Agenda Item
TO:
Mayor and City Council
Joe Lynch, City Administrator
Peter Hellegers, City Planner @
Planning Case #02-34, North Heights Church; Special Use Permit
1700 Highway 96
FROM:
SUBJECT:
ENCLOSURES:
1. November 2 I, 2002 Planning Commission Memo with attachments
2. Planning Commission Meeting Minute excerpt
Request
The applicant is requesting approval of a Special Use Permit to allow high school enrollment at
the current North Heights Family Life Center on their Arden Hills campus,
Phlnninl! Commission Recommendation
The Planning Commission is recommending approval of Planning Case #02-34, North Heights
Church, 1700 Highway 96, Special Use Permit, with the following conditions:
I. The main parking lot access drive for the high school use shall be from Highway 96
and North Heights Church shall direct as much traffic to the Highway 96 access drive
as possible.
Deadline for Al!encv Actions
The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on November 8,
2002. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statue, the city must act on this request by January 7,2002
(60 days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60 day
review period. The city may with the petitioner's consent extend the review period beyond the
120 days,
Page 2 of2
December 10, 2002
Planning Case #02-34
Options
1, Recommend approval as submitted.
2, Recommend approval with conditions.
3. Recommend denial. If the City denies the petitioners request, "...it must state in writing
the reasons for the denial at the time that it denies the request",
4. Table for additional information.
.
.
.
.
.
.
~
~HILLS
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
November 21,2002
TO: Planning Commission
PC Agenda Item 3. C
FROM: Peter Hellegers, City Planner
SUBJECT: Case #02-34
North Heights Church
Special Use Permit
Request
The applicant is requesting review of a special nse permit to allow high school enrollment
at the current Worth Heights Family Life Center on their Arden Hills campus.
Overview
Surrounding Area
North
South
Mixed Residential
Institutional
1-2: GeneTal Industrial District
East
Highway / Park
R-l: Single Family Residential
R-l: Single Family Residential
Highway / Park
Single Family Detached
Residential
Low Density Residential
West
Highway Right-of-Way
Highway Right-of-Way
Site Data
N.A. - Right-of-Way
Public and Institutional
Institutional
R -1: Single Family Residential
44.93 ACTes (1,957,360 squaTe feet)
Relatively Flat
Memo to Planning Commission
Planning Case #02-34
Page 2 of 4
.
Plan Review
There will beno structural alteration to the building. The high school function would be
housed within the existing building. The only plan item to review would be parking
reqnirements.
1. ParkiJi'g - Exceeds Code Requirement.
The Zoning Ordinance lists the parking requirement for secondary schools as; one
parking space per every school employee and 1 parking space per every 4 students,
Based on North Heights' projections of2-4 teachers and 12 students, the requirement
would be between 5 and 8 parking spaces for the first year, In the fourth year if the
school reached the approximate projection of 86 students and maintained the same
amount of faculty (class ratio of about I teacher per 22 students), the requirement would
reach 26 parking spaces. North Heights Church and Family Life Center already greatly
exceed this requirement.
.
;~ .-
Special Use P~rl'nit Analvsis
A general edncation school is allowed by a Special Use Permit in the R-I zoning district.
General education uses seem consistent with the church facility as most church traffic is
from the weekend whereas the high school would generate much smaller traffic volumes
and would be limited to the work week.
No structural alteration or interior remodeling will be performed to the building as the
Family Life Center, built in1998, was built to code requirements for high school
classrooms. Furthermore, the Family Life Center already contains the necessary class
rooms, physical education or recreational facilities, and facilities for musical education.
North Heights has indicated that enrollment would likely be about 12 stndents for the first
year and the enrollment may grow to 86 students by 2007, the fourth year of the proposed
high school use. North Heights has indicated that the high school may eventually be
shifted over to the Roseville campus after the church has been able to locate the
additional facilities necessary for the high school.
Section 8, D, 3, b ofthe Arden Hills Zoning Ordinance states the City Council and
Planning Commission:
.
.
Memo to Planning Commission
Planning Case #02-34
Page 3 of4
"...shall consider the effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety,
convenience and general welfare of the owners and occupants of surrounding
land, in particular, and the community as a whole, in general, including but not
limitedto the followingfactors: existing and anticipated traffic and parking
conditions; noise, glare, odors, vibration, smoke, dust, air pollution, heat, liquid
or solid waste, and other nuisance characteristics; drainage; population density;
visual and land use compatibility with uses and structures on surrounding land;
adjoining land values; park dedications where applicable, and the orderly
development of the neighborhood and the City within the general purpose and
intent of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Development Plan for the City."
The Planning Commission must make a finding as to whether or not the
proposed Special Use Permit would adversely affect the surrounding
neighborhood and larger community as per the aforementioned factors.
Deadline for Al!encv Actions
,
The City of A~den Hills received the completed application for this request on November
8, 2002. Purs~ant to Minnesota State Statue, the city must act on this request by January
7,2002 (60 d~ys), unless the City provides the petitioner with MittEmreasons for an
additional 60 day review period, The city may with the petitioner's consent extend the
. review period'beyond the 120 days.
Ootions
1. Recommend approval as submitted,
2. Recommend approval with conditions,
3. Recommend denial. If the City denies the petitioner's request, "... it must
state in writing the reasons for the denial at the time that it denies the request".
4, Table for additional information.
Recommendation
In Planning Ca.se #02-34, staff recommends that the application for a Special Use Permit
amendment be, approved subject to the following conditions:
1. The main parking lot access drive for the high school use shall be from
Highway 96 and North Heights Church shall direct as mnch traffic to the
Highway 96 access drive as possible,
.
Staff's recommendation is based on a finding that the proposed Special Use would not
cause any adverse impacts on the surrounding properties or the community as a whole,
In fact the proposed use may present some benefit in providing area residents with
another educational option for their high school age children, Staff has suggested the
Memo to Planning Commission
Planning Case.#02-34
Page 4 of 4
.
above condition to minimize the impact of any additional day-to-day traffic on the
surrounding community,
Attachments
1, Statement submitted by the applicant.
2. Location Map.
3. Building Plans of the Family Life Center.
"
"
.
"
.
.
.
.
North Heights Lutheran Church for the past 12 years has operated a Kindergarten through
8th grade school on its Roseville campus as North Heights Christian Academy. The
original vision for the Academy was as a Kindergarten through 12th grade school.
The Academy started slowly by adding grades as enrollment demanded. During the last
six years parents have expressed a desire for the Academy to expand into the high school
grades. The intent has been to begin adding one grade per year on the Roseville campus.
However, enrollment at the lower grades has outpaced expectations and available space '
on the Roseville campus is now limited. The church is developing a building plan to
increase classroom space on the Roseville campus within the next four to six years to
accommodate the Academy.
NHLC is requesting this Special Use Permit (SUP) to use existing facilities on the Arden
Hills campus to start the High School. The Family Life Center completed in 1998 has 9
classrooms on the lower level (see-attached plan) built to code specifications fur high
school classroom requirements. There will be no construction either new or remodeling
of the existing facilities.
The plan is to start with 9th and possibly lOth grade and add one grade per year. First year
enrollment is anticipated to be 8 students in 9th grade and 4 in 10th grade and is projected
to grow to approximately 86 students by the end of it's fourth year in 2007. The High
School would utilize existing space for classrooms, gymnasium, and music education,
and would collaborate with one of the local colleges for natural science lab work.
c
OQ.
~ca
o:E
-I
>- .
~
~
(I) OJ
(I) ::J
lL 0
0 (I)
0
0 C
~ ::J
(j)
-
0
~
0
Z
0.
0 OJ
0 2:
l[)
(I)
~
0
Z
o
o
o
l[)
w
z
~
.
(/)
.
.
" ,
x.
~
~
::s
~
'"T\
~
3
-.
<
r
~
>
"~,
c
~
~
(1)
'""")
r
(1)
~
-
\j
-
~
::s
.
,,-,~,-~,-,-'-~~'--'--------------'---"---,---~--_._--_.."----:-._-~~
<~~'\D!I}J,
1-,/. ,\""
rjil-.!\Jl'! '
('J {~...l
~
"
"'
j
--l
- ..~ . - ~... ~....
Akt. .. '. . .' ~ _
f~ ~ 0
q; iCl D
'.
'{\ ~
. ~
- - NM- .]) 7<>
, '''~i \J' -.,
U\,~~ ..... .:I:
'_ N m
to i'l y,-" ><
'00.;, ' rf ~V~: ""
, I;,; 'i CJ 1'\1 pl'
'rE-: ~:7 '
'~ "': .<~!I
.~. : (l!~. ~
v.:t...:-,......"I.......~_ ~
UOI,""
'~ll
"
:1
',\
\
r~ \"J '.
~~: ~
~
i
~YL.....J~~' ~
. . ^ ilfl frl ,II I~.: ;:1; TIn[ "......
"r--"-'tJ.P1'!i'l. , ).', ~
',' , : 'I,:J
, ,
: : 5',
: ' : ~
: !:~ ~
; .. .. ." , .. . ..,:~ : '~'f ~ -iji~
\, i 7~'< (.::)
\ J1"" /,1
_,J
l d.. : ~ NM"l 41 lli' 3~~!!~. Jf~
- '" \.)..I, J'.l:-oll:! "g,u,...a
.;J.....,.--... OrlH" ~-:-.~~..~.3~...u..u. . . 1~1.. 11t!~ . _ c
\: ~ ~~\~ j ~ -
,:\= 2~;~ : ~~ ~q
I nJ,t:o,,' I,
i \ "'~l~\ i~ ,,-um~~-rl u.~.~~~11,--~t~~
' \. J P I U I .. I III
i .., ~l':~)::::..:-~-^, 0" ~,..o~o!...., ~ i t~
, ~'~\. .....l,'
i....~J .,,~_
: 'I~ c,l'
: ~ DA
, -,
: ~
A~'~'1 ~iH ry~ '
<,\1' -< Ill!li'~ I
,": '''Iii W
':~ ~~
/
o
""11
""11
<>
rn
(j)
C;l
o
""11
."
hi
(j)
0)>
~\)
~~'lJ
~ -.
'~
~
:;sCb
~-s
($Ir
_.Ct>
c~
3-
~~~
2~~&.
~,j,
~~
~:~
<:t
.
A
N
.
11
><
-.
S\
:f
:s
>:l
(-.--
11
:ll
:s
".-
-...
::h
,I)
.
\
a
~
")
\
Ci:>
~
IJ
-
~
::s
~.
)40
I.~: ~n
::. i .i
o
(0
s
,
~
I~
~
!!I'~';
,~\~~.
'~ ~
$," ~g ~,
", 3~ '=.~
~~ ---
"R
'-_L J.
[~~f~ ; ~H~
o;\~",," ~ ,,".
~""'aI~:~'i ,~~,~
,,--2 \~ ~ f
I
., ' (,.'r;'i")
-" ...':; ..'."..............--." N
/ 11I..'1,.."",
i1i:' ' <ft," 7
cl~ l'\~
7 32 [~
~ Iffil "'<
'''''n rjfi ern
~!J>
^'
~Si\\'
..,,11..,.-...
~~.....,.
H,
';
"
("'"
~c
:.r:J
0"-
9.1!
.'
'1'1 7.:\.)1
..' ~~.
~~ J~'
.
,
1.111
'~ 1."
l\ltr
"
,
'1
'J"'ii: fl~'l
llll: Jml
'j'; : 11~
~ttt I .~~:: ~;\il({
~\1 -\ I ~ ~
~_ i{' L f\1~~ ~~~~
r~
~
,
~rIJI:
~g- ~
~~. r
?J' "
'"<Jl
0<
'T'
g~,
-~
~
,
r-M~
t'
:1./
. L
.
.
.
,
,
,
-"
~'I
,J .2-2,
f'
2 'l{'4~'-C ~
"(' .~ ,--- ~:. ),
: :lr
lot11 I II "~, ).IJ\
~' '!:!,l' ~:~: ,!t hI
r';;l ll,: .t.~
,- f1 ..~': ~l
c... 'I
1 ~- .:1\ :['
". (m'\., , .'
. ........--.-'..".-\ ~ jI""-:-'~-""-'--"-{:::--"""'~
~n--'k.' 1"'1": ~l~:! If9.' 1 "~I)
" I" ~ l:;-' LlJ' . ~ ~~
, , ..1
, J ,Ii~:r{, W ~ /11 ,
~~.. ~
ilL. !~' '7 ~ ~ j'j .
---'--. \. ~
ij ~ L
". "
).t,'I'l
'~tll
()l:~l
"
'J
;':'~
~~
"
~r
"
\~~
(>I,"
I'
~
i'
,
..rf-
1:"~
oS
3'
"
.. m:.,
~H\lU" ,I" ~
,/ !li
I'~
~T
,,~
~,.
,
n..(
rllO
zc
iiT:i!
n
q
/ '.
c.
~
~'
't
~
.J-:
\JJ
~
m
<:l
::r
o
-.
lS\
\
........
..
{',-
""
b~ a\
~ ~ :S. I"
(\::\ rl
. ..,....' .......:-!.m...."<:... ...
'lS\ ()
(\ -. (\
<:t: ::\
~3 ~
..
t~
il~
~i!
"'
"
......h....
..
<'
"
;:
OS>
\\
Q~
ll--
~~.
"
\JJ
~
Il.l
<:l
::r
(\
;]
,/
1;
3,
..
~ ~-LSr';:
S '-loa ~
~ 1-~~lT
\Jl .,. L-..: ('") -: t
~~ fu'
I
111
,
..,.....
'"
s
~
'8
'1
~.rl"\....r.J,.,D
v VVI "'~v
L...J
.
t.i
,
"
,i
'I
I,
'j
,
A
N
.
.
.
.
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - DECEMBER 4,2002
5
vaporizer. Mr. Buseman noted staff was recommending a full 23-foot fence. However,
he indicated hc had concerns about the stability of a 23-foot high fence.
There was no one present for or against the Special Use Permit request.
Chair Sand closed the public hearing at 8:02 p.m.
Commissioner Ricke moved, seconded by Chair Sand, to approve Planning Case #02-33,
Manufacturer's Services Planned Unit Development Amendment, subject to the
following conditions and recommendations:
1. The current screening enclosure shall be extended to enclose the area of the
proposed 13,OOO-gallon nitrogen storage tank and the entire screening
enclosure shall also extend vertically (from 16') to the top of the vaporizer
(23') to conceal the equipment from direct view.
The motion carried unanimously (5-0).
PLANNING CASE #02-34 - NORTH HEIGHTS CHURCH, SPECIAL USE PERMIT
Chair Sand opened the public hearing at 8:03 p.m.
Staff stated applicant was requesting review of a Special Use Permit to ,allow high school
enrollmenl'at the current North Heights Family Life Center on their Arden Hills Campus.
Staff reviewed their report dated November 21, 2002 and recommended approval of the
Special Use Permit subject conditions as outlined in their report.
COllllhissioner Duchenes asked if there would be a limit on the number of students, or a
time limit on this Special Use Permit. Mr. Hellegers replied the Commission could make
those recommendations if they wanted,
Dave Meissner, North Heights, noted the facility could handle more than 86 students, but
they did not anticipate anymore than 86 students at this time. He requested they not put a
time limit on this because it was unknown as to how many students they would have. He
stated it was their intent to eventually build the school in another location at a future date
if the need arose.
Commissioner Ricke asked how many staff would there be if there were 86 students.
Chris Glasow, North Heights, stated the school could be grades 7 through 12 and the 7th
and 8th grade teachers would help fill out the curriculum, Initially, there might be 56
students. 'He noted they did not anticipate the enrollment to grow qnickly due to their
inability to provide certain services the students and parents wanted, such as a football
team.
Commissioner Zimmerman asked if they had State accreditation. Mr. Glasow replied it
did. He noted the space requirements had been met under State guidelines.
Chair Sand inquired about the parking. Mr. Glasow stated the students did not start
driving until their sophomore year and from prior experience, most of the students
carpooled, so he did not anticipate there would be any parking or traffic problems. He
.
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - DECEMBER 4, 2002
6
noted there would be roughly one instructor per 25 students, He stated there would also .
be one administrator and one administrative assistant.
Commissioner Zimmerman inquired about lunch preparation. Mr. Glasow stated they
had a kitchen on-site where the food would be prepared.
Chair Sand indicated they would have enough parking spaces, even if everyone drove.
He noted the real issue was traffic issues.
Commissioner Ricke asked what the proposed start and ending times were. She noted
concern about the traffic in that area, but it might make a difference depending on how
times were staggered. Mr. Glasow replied they anticipated their start time would be
closer to their elementary start time, which was at 8:50 a,m. He noted this would not
conflict with the other schools in the area.
Francis Podlasek, 4410 North Snelling Avenue, stated North Heights had been a good
neighbor, but he had concerns about the traffic going south on Snelling Avenue. He
asked for assurances that the students would not use Snelling Avenue.
Mr. Glasow stated the commuting part would be to campus and home again with
commuting between Bethel and North Heights by bus. The students would not be driving
between the two campuses, He assured the Commission the buses would go down
Highway 96 and not down North Snelling.
Chair Sand closed the public hearing at 8:22 p.m.
.
Commissioner Zimmerman moved, seconded by Commissioner Bezdicek, to approve
Planning Case #02-34, North Heights Church, Special Use Permit, subject to the
following conditions and recommendations:
I, The main parking lot access drive for the high school use shall be from
Highway 96 and North Heights Church shall direct as much traffic to the
Highway 96 access drive as possible.
The motion carried unanimously (5-0),
UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS
A. PLANNING CASE #02-28 - DEAN & SUZANNE VOLKERT. 1330 NURSERY
HILL LANE, VARIANCE
Staff stated applicant was requesting a variance a garden shed to remain in the Side Yard
Corner Setback area. He noted the garden shed would be moved to the northeast, which
was different location than the original location in the southwest comer of the lot. He
noted the proposed location was the only other option applicant had for the placement of
~~ .
Chair Sand asked which location were they being asked to approve, location A or
location B. Mr. Hellegers replied they were being asked to approve location A.
~
.
.
.
~
~~ILLS
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
Agenda Item 8.B
December 11, 2002
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Joe Lynch, City Administrator
SUBJECT: 2003 City Retreat
ENCL.: 2003 City Retreat Proposal from Marilyn Condon
Backl!round
After meeting with Council and City staff to discnss desired agenda items, outcomes, and
expectations for the 2003 City Retreat, Marilyn Condon, our retreat consultant, has put together a
proposal. The proposal includes a series of meetings between Council and staff to discuss
vision, goals, communication, improving relationships, and role and responsibility clarification.
The proposal is based upon the meetings being inter-related and serial; although council can pick
and choose between the three sessions. However, Session #1 is the building block and is the one
meeting that City Council should strongly consider.
Cost
To date we have spent $1,994 on City Council and staff meetings with the retreat consultant to
discuss the agenda, process, and timing. Staff has identified the cost related to each of the
individual sessions as well as indicated the total cost (including the money spent to date). The
total 2003 City Council retreat budget is $3,500. Even if Council chooses to do only Session #1,
we will be over the 2003 retreat budget. Council had previously indicated that they were willing
to look at making expenditures over the budget in order to get the right results from a City
retreat.
Session
Session I
Session II
Session III
Session Cost
$2,000
$1,600
$1,000
Total Cost
$3,994
$5,594
$6,594
Schedule
The dates for two of the three sessions have been identified. The dates were chosen based on
previously scheduled Council meetings, vacation schednles, holidays, and staff availability.
Memo: 2003 City Retreat
December 11, 2002
2
Recommendation
Staff recommends that Council approve the scheduled Session I and Session II meetings for the
2003 City Retreat.
Staff further recommends that Council reserve the right to hold Session III dependant upon the
outcomes achieved in Sessions I and II, with a date to be determined by consensus agreement of
the City Council.
"
.
.
.
.
.
.
City of Arden Hills Retreat Proposal
Prepared by Marilyn Condon
December 4, 2002
In interviews with city council members, the city administrator and deputy
clerk of Arden Hills, a strong desire was expressed to improve relationships
between and among council members and staff. Council members agreed
that with the election of a new mayor it would be appropriate to set a vision
for the future and review goals for 2003. With these desires in mind, the
following recommendations are made for three facilitated retreat sessions.
Session 1
City Council and Staff Management
Building a New Future
Objectives: Bring together the new council
Create a future vision
Set goals and measures for 2003
January 25, 2003
Session 2 February 21,2003
City Council and All staff
Building Bridges
Objectives: Improve relationship between council and staff
Discuss mutual issues and concerns
Identify ways to work better together in the future
Session 3 March,2003
City Council and Staff Management
Roles and Responsibilities
Objectives: Give and receive feedback
Identify expectations of each other
Commit to improving working relationships
Costs
Session 1
Session 2
Session 3
2 hours preparation, 8 hours facilitation
2 hours preparation, 6 hours facilitation
I hour preparation, 4 hours facilitation
Total time: 23 hours
.
.
.
~
EN HILLS
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
AGENDA ITEM No. 8.C
December 16, 2002
TO: Mayor and City Co.uncil
FROM: Cynthia Young, Personnel DirectorlDeputy Clerk ~
SUBJECT: Office Support Specialist Appointment
OFFICE SUPPORT SPECIALIST:
The City received 56 applications fo.r the Office Support Specialist position. Three were selected
for interviews with the myself and the Directors of Operations and Maintenance and Community
Services. The candidates also interviewed with the Recreation Supervisor, Finance and Personnel
Assistant, Customer Service Representative and Office Support specialist.
Staff brought forth a unanimous reconnnendatio.n to select one outstanding candidate,
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council appoint Pang Silseth as the Office Support specialist with a
start of Monday, December 16,2002.
,
.
.
.
~
EN HILLS
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
December 12, 2002
Agenda Item S.D
TO:
Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Joe Lynch, City Administrator
SUBJECT:
Pay Request No. 18 - Request for ayment
Change Order No.8 - Request for Approval
ENCLOSURES:
Pay Application No. 18 from Rochon Corporation
Request for Authorization for Change Order No. 18 from ArchitectUral
Alliance
Backl!tound
Enclosed are copies of Pay Request No. 18 from Rochon Corporation, for work completed during
May 2002 through November 2002. Also enclosed is a request for Change Order No, 8 from
Architectural Alliance, for work performed by Rochon Corporation during that same time period.
Staff has reviewed and discussed both of these with Architectural Alliance and finds them to be
acceptable and appropriate.
At this time, staff has determined that the amount remaining plus the retainer is satisfactory to
make payments for contracts to correct any outstanding items.
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Council approve Pay Request No. 18 from Rochon Corporation, in the
amount of$129,813.65, for work completed during May 2002 through November 2002.
Staff also reconunends that the Council authorize Change Order No. 8 from Architectural
Alliance, for work completed by Rochon Corporation for that same time period. This does not
approve payment for Change Order No. 8 at this time, but allows Rochon Corporation to come
forward with Pay Request No, 19, which will be the costs identified in this Change Order.
.
ARCHITECTURAL ALLIANCE
.
December 12, 2002
344 LI NO BERG H TERM INAl
Mr. Joe Lynch - City Administrator
Arden Hills City Hall
1245 West Highway 96
Arden Hills, MN 55112-5794
MINNEAPOLlS/ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
ST. PAU l, M IN NESOTA 55111.3003
TELEPHONE (612) 126-9012 FAX (612) 726-1047
Re: Arden Hills City Hall
Payment Application Number 18
Cornm. No. 1997149
Dear Joe:
We have reviewed Rochon Corporation's Application and Certificate for Payment No. J 8 for the Arden Hills
City Hall Project. The payment application conforms to our December 12, 2002 correspondence relative to
the withholding (retaiuage) for corrective wolk and wolk not completed. This payment application
includes Change Ordezs Six and Seven. It does not include Change Order Eight. The pay application covezs
the period ending November 30,2002. We recommend payment in the amount of $129,813.65. We have
enclosed a spreadsheet that summarizes payments to date for your reference. Please call me if you have any
questions.
.
Sincerely,
PETER VESTERHOLT
Principal
Cc
Enclosure:
Jeff Weiman - Rochon Corporation, Jeanne Sterner, file
2 copies of Payment Application, spreadsheets
.
""
0> "
<0 -<
.~~
o Z
:;-1
Ul
C
'5::
'5::
)>
;lJ
-<
~
.~
N
.~
""
~
....
<D
00000000
::r::r::r::r::r::r::r::r
Q) Q) ID Q) Q) Q) Q) Q)
::J;::J :J :J ::J :J ::J ::l
<.CtCtC<.C<.C<OtCtC
CD ro CD ([) ro CD {[I CD
0000000'0
..., ...., ..., ...... ...., ..., ..........,
0...0.0..0..0..0...0..0..
CD m (I) CD 11l (tl cp.,<tJ
...., ...., ...., ..., ...., ...., -. ....,
zzzzzzzz
9~oooooo
CO-.....Jo>c.n+:-.wN
~
~~~
-"~~
a-O
N~"""
~~O>
:j;:
-
o
~
....-
NND
_NO>
~om
o
....'"
00
~ ~
~ ,I '-I W 0
~ !;Ii, [ g!~
m (')~im 0 ~iz
O~: ;1:; -o1~ 0 (C}>
:;;0 -.! ., ....':J 3 m r-
001 CDCDlro "U 0"0
m~lg'a~.o. ro '<0
;U liilnr " g CD! [ 9 z
en (Q ::J Q) (f) Ul (f) Q) -i
cCD 0'< o(f) Q)c.::J::tI
;;:0<1> 3<1> ;lJ1;lJi3.3i'g)>0
s: 0 8' ~ ~I'!R. !!t:(I) -10
)> 3 T\ ....i~ ~. ~.:_ 0 -I
:::c~S'Clll~ia'QOa..cn
-<!!Loo"l:: $'<0<0 ([I ~ CD C
(II ::r CD (JJ CD ct> 0.. CD Cil ~
Irlce,,!r!:::
'~"I'~' ~:~ ~. ~'!~'
:;<0 CG -.J 0> 0'1 ~ w
I ;
IJ I' I '"
i~I~1 {hi {h ~I
I CD 01;. c.n {h <.n .t-.j
<DII'V' N f\.>!c.n N
NI~ ~i{h ~~i~811'"
o0~~~~~~~
aN,-.JO-.Jwmoo
~I(J):~O~W-.JOO
!
i{h I~ ~
;_1'0..) ~ ,-tfl y,.!'J N
I-.J ...... -(Il ...... ...... <D <0
O1v)O'1COifl<.o~ ~
O>NN01<DO'1N N
~Co"".......li:.n~wo -0
en N .j::l. N -.JIm w 0 {h 0
en CD -J W ......,0) 00 0[00
~ CD ~!~ :"""'1<0 0 6,60
<J? ...... 01;.t>. (!) 0 W 0: 0 0
'" '"
I!V'$ {h {h iA j'J
:(11:............ W -E><J. W (0
colo>coc.n.....-.J~
(J)(O()1()1COW,N
~j<O ~ 0,0 OJ ~:a
N .j::,.. -.J -.Jic.n co W'O
:....I~ ~ ~i!=> ~ ~,~
o (J) -"- ...... W co N'D
cf? .j::,.. -.J (0 0) m Nlo
, ! 1 I
{hi , iA M
_N ififfiifii ffi.!'lj N
w........WO'l.(l)O'l(O (0
co co 0'1 <.n N -.....J-f:>..i .t-.
.......()1.<.noCOCON! .!"J
........OCOiO(O(O(OO 0
co <.n COIc.n ~ to w 0 -{h 0
~ :'I't" ~ t" !>> ~ ~ 0 0
o........t-.wOJ.<DCOOOO
*~ (0 CJ1 (j) ........ to 0 0 0 0
'"
N
I~
,,,,i I '"
l.!'l .(I) ifi W {h..N
I.......NCJ1CO-ffiCOI(O
N (j) 0'1.........t-. CJ11.t-.1
O'1O)Oo>N<OiN
NIO 0 (0 (0 (0 (010
(0 -f:>.. 0 .t-. In (0 -f:>..la {h
N?' ?' r'J :-'" :---J ~;~ ~
W W to co -.....J,'::" ........'00
-;R 0........ ....... Nio> cola 0
o I :!
; I
I I!'
:.(1) ! iwi {h-ffi
I~""""~I ~N
I~ wlcoltv -(t) tv (0
-f:>..CO:.......OO>O>CJ1
<D co!m CJ1 W co ~
~I(..J Ni<O:.....I~ (n 0,
f"V'-..J .......1U'1IO'>IN to -f:>..
(oi~ ~I:-"" ~[~ ~I""
'" <D "'I" 01"" en 0
cF,........-..JN<O.J:>.WO
'"
N
<0
....
N
10
""0
00
00
00
'"
N
~I~
N N
0,0
.... 0
.... 0
00
00
"....;lJ0
a.~g~
<1> "':J
::l~0..2.
;!:;ror):o
=~Q)a.
{/l ..+ '" CD
~ ::::0 (J) ::I
'5::0",
ZccI
::l (I) =
Ol 0.. 5' (Il
"'r<1>
~o>'"
~",,'"
N<1>O
GJ~
0> ID
c.,
~
=
~
=
--<
~
~
--<
=
=
~
~
;Do
r-
t:::
;Do
Z
C':>
.....
....
~
~
"""
:::;
---'
"""
~
-=
=
=
>-
"-"
~
=
=
"-"
=
-=
0'"
0'"
0'"
0'"
~ a.
N 00
"
'"
N""
""
a"#.
'" I'-
1'-"'
I'- '"
00
>!1
o
'"
:0
'"
"'
0'"
C!~
I'- '"
" '"
'", "'
N 00
'" '"
""""
o
0'
-.il
,,:
""
Nt
~
""
01
o
'"
"
"' ,
N:
""
o
o
"
"
"'
N
""
o
'" 0
roN
O~
~
o
o
.0
00
'"
'"
<I>
o
N
,;0
~
000
~ro;:
to
'"
'"
'"
'"
o
o:i
'"
"
I'-
'"
'"
.
'" ~ 00
cnc.qcn
mm0
"''''''
o. m'o
001'-
to v'(1')
01'-
("")- N,w-
<1>""
C0:...q- 0)
c.qLO~
N~~
"''''''
co v -..:t~
M~~ N to
Oi..--O)l!)
CD 'L.() Yi- "'>t
N"IN- w-
EA-IY)
~ ~
toto
<'l
o
o
"
"
"'
N
~.
N
~
,
0('") ("');l.Oi......
o07!CT.!c.q,,,":
o v viN:"""
o OJ OO!N,ro
000:(0:...-
N -..i <dirilC"i
V \{)VIC"?
en 0 (!)i...--
N" €A- ri;NIw-
W EA-:W
vloo[(O m~
~'j::ii;:: ~.~
'VLOiCQv(D
V~O"l'V <DCO
-;oo-..i:
;...-- 0 or- "::t
il.()("') iN LO
'N:N-'4h W-
W-;{/).:
o
o
'"
"
"'.
~
~~N
af2f2
050...-
O--~~
NN
l" ,'" 'U I Q); Q) rJ} '" .<:: !~ >- N '" " "' <0 I'- 00
'" 1;; Q) 0>10) Q) ::> if>
~ '0 '" 0 .... co: ro ro Cl :~ '"*-o:: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
'" <1l Z Z Z Z Z Z z
1: 0 0 .8 ,;; .~ 0 ~ LLE<( z
'" 0:: .8 (f)i~ ~ ~ <: 0, 0 ~ diiw :v :v ~ ~ :v :v
'" -o'a.> Q.)~, '" '" "
0 '" E E ;;0 :;; E E E '" '" '0 '" '"
"" N Q) ::> c n::: n:::!~: ~ 0 0 0 0 >-
if> <1l ~ <: <1l if> ~' (j ~ Q) ::J 0'0 0 0 0::
if> ~ <1l (/) fa C 0> (j')
'" -' "' .<:: '" if> "' ,,",<1l l\l Q.l:Q.) '" '" '" '" '" '" -<
c '" '" ::J 0:: 0>:01 OJ OJ OJ OJ Q) Q) :;;
;g '0 "' 0 -.0 Iii 1:
'in <: q; ~ W c c c c c c c <:
I ::J ::> Z ;.. (i '-g ['S; <: al '" Cl <1l,l\l l\l <1l <1l l\l l\l l\l :;;
al 0 .D cl~ " () '<::1'<:: .<:: .<:: .<:: .<:: .c .c -< ::>
:;; E ~ :v 0:: 0 0 0 0 0 0
<: 0:: '" (ala... ~ 0,0 (/) ~.
'" " rn 0 ::> D- O
'0 "" 1;) ~ c 0 W "' <.:> f-
4' <1l ~ <1l "' W Z
-' I .c Iii <<LID Cl W
- '0 0 0 .......,-.J Z :;; N
0 C C Oi '"
" '" q; f- f- <( :;;:
~ => '" '" :I: Q)
0 0 '" 4' z <1l
0:: " <.:> D- o.
o C"') ("')iL.()itOl'~ cnimivi*
~ en O>,OJiv (1') N'O!l!)i"<t"
g ~ ~i~I~I~:gl~lffi!~
a 0 O,L.().(()!Q)'~I~;~i~
N -..i <o1~:cilci,v:(():LO'
~ ~ ~:~:~ig ~'~:~
N €A- M'0i:WIN:N":w;w
EA- EA-:w-i iW:EIT,
,
,
o 0 00:...--10":1 v LOi"'--:~
o 0 0 01~:~iq N;~"g
o v v ...-iCOIC"')jo (")kj
o v v o ,..--,co 1"-- 1"-'(0 1J')
o 1J') LO ~~..--_ co_!~ C0 (0_'1"-
N ~ v ~!O;vl"-- ~ m
~ ~ ~,~:~!~ig~ ~;
N 'NIN,~!N-i~tlTlW.1
w :w.,w :Y}-I(fl-I
i
gig
vi"'<i ..--
v'v N
to LO Lf)'O,
N v~i~ 0';
l.Olo'o
w.0'l'0..--
N N,EI)
ifA.W'
:~
qi~i~i~ 8
O;..--:CO:{'I') .
"--'''--'O>I{'I'),cC
1.{')_:"--_!~i~!CO
..--;O'..--'Mi
gj~:~18
~I~i(l)~
EA-Iw.i (fl-
o OeV
q ~i~
v 0,0:)
'v 1"-'lJ')
;tI) v_I(/')_
i~o:):o:)
1.0 COit-
m LO_:V7
N~
Y7iY}
coimit--'v
~IC!I~ 0
......il.O!<.o N
,--:(!):v M
...--1..-- 0) ~
O"Lfi:'.;f;v
mloico (D
'7jN;N '7_
"":!,---!fh
<1><1>
~
""
N<'l
"'''
c c
:.:J:.:i
vL()(Dr--COm
Q.l Q.l Q) Q.l (I) Q)
c c c: c c c
:.:J:.:J::J:.:J:J:.:J
~ ~ ~ ~ ~m ...0::::
~ '" r r r r c: c: c: c: c:
_0 ~:;;: N'" 0 5. 5' 5' 5'
~ "'- ... III :J :J :J :J :J
~ 0'" '" 2> -'" (J) .. (J) (J) (J) (J) (J) (J) (J)
- dO 2> 2> 0- ro
0 ~ ~o ID co .... Q')iU'l ... '^' '"
'" ~~ 0
!
i
i
I
I .... .... ..
~-EA-!VJ'J~.!'J~w~ '"
ID
.. wi_ (j) -..,J .;:.. co 0 -'" ...
'" N!-I:Io 0 (]'I ~ <0 00 W '"
CXhCDWW- CO........w
.. 2. wi1..> Co tv ~:... 0, 0, 0
0
'" ' "'I~ ID 0 '" 0 '" '" ~
CD OU'lONW~COOOOO 0
0 ~m~mi-.JC,..lmc.oto 0
0 o........(..)wO> (Oww
""
III )>
'l6 -<
.'^'~
o Z
:;-<
(f)
C
S
S
)>
;0
-<
-<
00000000
:::r~:::r:::r~::r:::r::r
Q) m m !l) m !l) m Q)
:J :J: :J :J :J: :J :J :J
roc.oroCCCDro(QCC
(tI ([) (I) (I) CD <D <D (I)
~ Q Q Q Q ~ QI~
a.. 0. a. a. a. c.. Q.1a.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~!!!:
z z z z z z Z'Z
o ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
CO""-Jffic.n.t-.WN-->..
.~
o
'"
'^'
.'"
ID
....
~
...
ID
o I
~! I~ ~ I~
m I O'g: m 0
~?II ~i:?3 3
c ~ (IJ C'D CD CD "'C
m :J I Q) ;a -0<. a. ro
:::OmBJ"'Ccro ro
(I) to :J llJ QJ Ul a.
c:<D @'< ()Ul AJ~
;;:0 3(J)~",o.
:!:oOCD::I..-+::\t(f)
_3 "'TI3.3i,~.....
--0'-- Oi:J:r 0
:::U-!~.O~'m Q) m
-< ~!(I) C IDCC co
(]) ~:J'" <D Cf): (I) CD a.
z
!It
o
:r
III
:J
'"
(J)
<Y
'<
!O
:r
(fI1ll
c,:J
3 ieg
00
oa.
III '"
co (iJ
-E.4Yi- .El')~ w
U)~.!'>J'J-tI)~w~~.!'J
N~-...IOO"""'OO-(O
NOO1(J)<.n->.COW~
O.....W......O............<ON
<OWC'ON......(,.h~U'lU'lO
-....!WCDOtOCOooNNO
:"""O.flO.V>COt..O"'-lOOCOO
WCOOoNOW~<O(OO
#o>~m"........~wwo
{ni~ ~ YJ
-<:h: !VI.!'> (fi!-W 5.>J
->. i-Elt 00 <D -->. 0 a
-..J.fIo.mOUl<J1CO
-..IN......wNm......
(OCoUa :""'Cc0101
<oNQWONWN
~C)OJ.t>.O)oco
<0:"""0.0 010>(0
cfcoco-..J01wcow
..
.. -'"
ID
'^' ...
CD '"
'" 0
"'0
'" 0
CD 0
'^' 0
I
,I i I
i I-EflYJ: IYJ-EA- YJ
"I' IJ'>J'V;YJI~;~ U).!'>
->., !(O<o:->'oo-->'(O
~1~i8 ~,~I~ ~ ~ ~
$~,Wi~o:NI~rn m 0
~ ~ ~i~ ~!N ~ ~ ~ g
~ <.0 eo::"" a 0 a <0 (0 0
(j( 0 OOIOl c..> Ol co (;.) (;.) 0
j !
I I
<h I~ ~ {I) ~ ~ w ~
->. <.OCo....>.oo->.<O
en -Et'J-1:::'- ->. Ol tj co C,..J ~
c..> ....... ~ co (;.) _ ->. CD !\J
Oi.~ SlUt m ->. In C:n 0
->"00(0->"00>""'" N 8
~'~OI~~O~~O
~~ic..>i~~Co~NO
)>"';00
i3.~g~
CD ~ ~ 0
~~a._
~m~~
m~",a.
- ::0 CD ~
S:oooI
Z c c _.
:J (Jl =
<Jl a. S. (Jl
"'r'"
->.~~
"''''0
;0'"
o :J
III ro
o.~
:=-
=
~
=
=
~
~
~
=
=
:=-
~
:Do
r-
!:::
:Do
2!
<=
.....
......
c.:o
=
c:a:
::J
--'
c:a:
~
<C
=
=
>-
"-"
~
!::::
=
"-"
=
<C
L
<1>
C
<1>
o
U)
U)
<1>
~ .~
I~
c <1>
-E~1fj~
<{.JmI
'Q-gSC
>. :J ;g IV
:t::OM"E
01>:,,<(
'0
'"
o
tr
~~
"'~
-'",
'0'"
c
:JZ
~:2
""
g~~~g
o <ci<Or--:..q:
Or--i:;oro
00 -l{)........
N'V~~.o'-":
;;!; ~ ....._~~
NE.'7C'>cri
... ......
"''''''
Q) Q) Q) dl
c: C c: c
:.:J::i:.::i:.J
~ f C1)"'O
:Jw~~
(f) 'E 0 0
.....O.aU5
O<(<1>E'O
"':J<:
n:: ~ en ro
1-.<: '0
Z 0 <1>
o >. m
0.0 a.
-' <1> E
<( '" 0
Z <: 0
(3~ ro
ii: () 0:
o Q) 1-1
Z I
'" "'0
m~",!q
cvi Me<)
NO'lf""lO
C')_ U> ~ ""_,
CO ....;- en 1'--1
V......NU"l
a_en. 'If"" (hI
'" ....
U) ~ I
,
I.OCOJ'--cocn,
<1> <1> <1> .. <111
c C c .5 .~ I
:.:J:.::i:..:i.,J.....J
I
~~*~~~fi:
~ ~ ~ _ i:L ~-C(
Q)Q)~goo~
I>:i~~jl~~
;:;loQ c (lJ C w
m > CO we
I c ~ E : e a:::
I iii n. 5 i3: 0
w~o I UJ
ro Q) 'c>
c;...J Z
I- <(
J:
(J
o ~'"
20QC;ooo~e
Orn~f'.I~ro~~o~""""
:::~0~ro NN
NMvLO<DI'-CO
ci ci 0 0 0 ci ci ci
ZZZZZZZZ
ffi ffi (j) ifi (u ffi Ii> ffi
"C'U"O"C"'C"'O"O"'O
00000000
Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q)
0)0)0)0)0)0)0)0)
c c c c c c c c
ro rn m rn ro cu m ro
..c..c:..c..c..c..c:..c..c:
00000000
00
00
'" CD
........
co.'"'
0'"
"'...
...
o
o
..:
CD
'"
...
'"
...
(J)
"
~
~.
'"
o
N
~
N
.
>-
I>:
<(
:2
:2
::>
(f)
1-"
Z
ill
:2
~
n.
.
'0
"
<11
'"
'"
n.
.
.
.
RECEIVED
DEe 122002
ARCHITECTURAL All!l\rY-
WAIVER OF CONSTRUCTION LIEN, PAYMENT
BOND AND LIEN FUNDS
December 1, 2002
For good and valuable consideration, the undersigned hereby irrevocably and unconditionally waives and
releases any and all (a) rights and claims for a construction or other lien on land and buildings being
constructed, altered, erected or repaired and to the appurtenances thereunto, (b) rights and claims on any
payment bond(s) furnished in conjunction with said construction, alteration, erection or repair, and (c)
rights and claims for lien on money, bonds, or warrants due or to become due to the prime contractor
therefor. The property covered by this waiver is owned by the City of Arden Hills (owner), is located at
1245 West Highway 96, Arden Hills, MN is described as Arden Hills City Hall and this waiver pertains to
a portion of the work to be performed by Rochon Corporation (prime contractor).
This waiver covers all labor, material and supplies for construction, alteration, erection, and repairs
furnished by the undersigned under a contract with City of Arden Hills through the date of this waiver in
the amount of ONE HUNDRED TWENTY NINE THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED THIRTEEN AND
65/100 Dollars ($129,813.65)
This lien waiver is not valid until the amount listed above has been received.
. .
!@"':C GP..'.~': L. 8URGHARDT ~
{~~3:':"; r:c,:;-.",:c:: FL'::::L!C - M\~JNESOTA. J Company Name Rochon Corporation
-';:.'.: ~.:I C::,.-:,m. [X:.J1fCS J8n. 31, 2005 ~
~V'NVV"vV~-'~.J By
:::!:;.:~ ~~'"
PAGE ONE OF 2 PAGES
.
APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT (SUBSTITUTE AlA DOCUMENT G702J
TO 'OWNER): Cily of A~dell Hill,
4364 West Round Lake Rd
Arden Hjlls, MN 55112-5794
PROJECT: Arden Hills City Hall
1245 West Highway 96
Arden Hills, MN 55112
FROM (CONTRACTORI: Rochon Corporation
3550 Annapolis Lane North, Suite 101
Plymouth. MN 55447
APPlICATION NO:
18IRevise<l)
PERIOD TO:
30-Nov.02
VIA IARCHITECT): Architectural Alliance
400 Cliftoll Avenue S.
Minneapolis. MN 55403
ARCHITEcrs
PROJECT NO:
CONTRACT FOR: General Construction
CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT
CONTRACT DATE:
8/15/00
CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY
Change Orders approved in ADDITIONS DEDUCTIONS
previous months by Owner
TOTAL 139.528.93
Approved this Month
Number Date Approved
6 12/1712001 20.672.00
7 2/25/2002 3,876.00
TOTALS 24,548.00
Net cl1ange by Change Orders 164.076.93
The undersigfled Contractor certiiies that to the best oj the Contractor's
knOwledge, ullormation and belief the Work covered by this Application
jor Payment has been completed in accordance with the Contract
Documents, that all amounts have been paid by the Contractor for Work for
which previous Certificates for Payment were issued and payments received
from the Owner, and that current payment shown herein is now due
CONTRACTOR, ~1on C"""don
By. r
Jerry 6rato
/
Date: December 1, 2002
1I~"^",Ai'V'^,,^,,^^^^^^,,,.
i@'''GR'''cr L rl'~G"AR '
.<~-~., } \,~'. .,.: . IJ....".i ,n DT"
'~~:r~~) NOTARY PU2L1C - ~mWESOTA ~
6.; ..... r..~1 Comm. Expires SilO. 31, 2005
..
-,
ARCHITECT'S CERTIFICATE FOR PAVMENT
In accordance with the Contract Documents. based on on-site observatlons
and the data comprising the above application, the Architect certifies to the
OWl'\er that to the best of the Architecl'S knowledge, information al'\d belief the
Work has progressed asindicall!d. the Quality of the Work is in accordance
with the Contract Documents. and the Contractor is efltitled to payment
of the AMOUNT CERTIFIED.
Application is made for Payment, as shown below, in connection
with the Contract, Continuation Sheet, Substitute AlA Document -
G703 is attached.
1. ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM.... ....................... $
2. Net Change by Change Orders..
3. CONTRACT SUM TO OA TE {Line 1 + /.21..
4. TOTAL COMPLETED & STORED TO DATE....
(Column G on G703)
2,942,000.00
164,076.93
3,106,076.93
3,065,507.96
5. RETAINAGE:
a. %ofCampletedWork
(COlumn 0 + E an G703)
b. %af$wredMaterial
(Column F an G703)
Total Retainage 'Line 5a+5b or
Total in Column I of G703l.. .
17.184.03
3.048,323.93
.
6 TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE..
lLine 4 less line 5 Totall
7. LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR
PAYMENT (Line 6 from prior Certificate!..
2.918,510.28
129,813.65
57,753.00
8 CURRENT PAYMENT DUE..
.........$
9. 8ALANCE TO FINISH. PLUS RETAINAGE..
(Line 3 less line 6)
State of: Minnesota
County of: Hennepin
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 1 st day of December, 2002
Not"y P,:'J: / 0
M~om:o"::,L~,"~~~t~JjL
/Z9;8IJ,br
AMOUNT CERTIFIED.......,..,..,...................$
IAttach explanation if amount certified differs from the amount applied for.)
ARCHITECT,Anaftrectt<<.Az- ACL~
8Y.~""
This certificate is flot negotiable_
only to the Contractor named herein. Issuance. payment and acceptal1ce
of paymem are without prejudice to any rights of the Owner or Contractor
under this Contract.
.
.
PAGE 2 OF 2
CONTINUATION SHEET
Substitute AlA Document G703
Arden Hills City Hall
TO:
CONTRACTOR'S PROJECT NO:
18 (Revisedl
l-D&c-02
l-Mal'-02
JO-Nov-02
0028
APPLICATION NUMBER:
APPLICATION DATE:
PERIOD FROM:
.
SCHEDULED PREVIOUS THIS STORED TOTAL BALANCE
CODE DESCRIPTION VALUE APPLICATION APPLICATION MATERIAL lODATE " rOFINISH RETAINAGf
01000 GEN'L RQMTS 161,250.09 150,872.59 0.00 0.00 150.872.59 100 371.50 7,543.63
02200 EARTHWORK 68.897.00 68.897.00 0.00 0,00 58.897.00 100 0,00 0,00
02480 LANDSCAPING 39,122.00 31,477.00 (8,698.851 0.00 22,778.15 S8 16.343.85 0,00
02513 ASPHALT PAVING 57,252.00 57,252.00 0,00 0.00 57,252.00 100 0_00 0.00
02600 SITE uTILITIES 143.700.00 143,43300 267.00 0,00 143,700.00 100 0,00 0,00
04200 CONCRETE/MASONRY 843,023.00 840,471.00 2,552.00 0.00 843,023_00 100 0.00 0,00
03410 PRECAST CONCRETE 44,565.00 44,565.00 0.00 0.00 44,565.00 100 0.00 000
05100 STEEL F A8RICA TION 108,087.50 10B,166.50 (79.00) 0.00 106,087.50 100 0.00 0.00
05600 STEEL ERECTION 75,739.50 76,147.50 (408,00) 0,00 75,739.50 100 0.00 000
05500 EXPANSIN JT COVERS 2,000.00 571.11 1,426.69 0_00 2,000.00 100 0,00 000
06100 CARPENTRY 219,104.00 206,928.00 10,176.00 0.00 219.104.00 100 000 0,00
06400 MILLWORK 66,170.00 65,622.74 547.26 0.00 66,170.00 100 0.00 0.00
07160 WATERPROOFING 10,000.00 10.000.00 000 0,00 10,000.00 100 0.00 0.00
07241 EIFS 1,482.00 0.00 1,482.00 0,00 1,482.00 100 0_00 0.00
07530 ROOFING 63,060.00 62,670.00 390.00 0,00 63,060.00 100 0.00 000
07900 CAULKING 6,714.00 6,714.00 0.00 0.00 6,714.00 100 0.00 0.00
08100 HMIOOORSIHARDWARE 32.820.00 31.465.00 1,355.00 0.00 32,820.00 100 0,00 0.00
08360 OH DOORS/AUTO QPER 6,68100 6,031,00 650.00 0.00 6,681.00 100 0.00 0.00
08800 ALUM STOREFRONT 200.213.00 198,578.00 1,635.00 0,00 200,213.00 100 0.00 0.00
09300 CERAMIC/QUARRY TILE 39,545.00 34,545.00 0.00 0.00 34,545.00 87 5,000.00 0.00
09500 ACOUSTICAL CEILING TI 18,913.00 18,565.-00 348,00 0.00 18,913.00 100 000 0.00
09680 CARPTEIVINYL TILE 43,632.00 38,422,00 5,210.00 0.00 43,632.00 100 0.00 0,00
09900 PAINTING 16,550,00 16,543.00 7,00 0,00 16,550.00 100 0.00 0.00
10900 ACCESS PANELS 437.08 437.08 0,00 0.00 437.08 100 0,00 0.00
10200 LOUVERS 1,900.00 1,seO.00 0.00 0.00 1,900,00 100 0.00 0.00
10100 VISUAL DISPLAY BOARD 1,075.00 1,075.00 0.00 0,00 1,075.00 100 0.00 0.00
10160 TOILET PARTITIONS 4,453.83 4,453.83 0.00 0.00 4,453.83 100 0.00 0.00
10800 TOILET ACCESSORIES 3,327.00 3,327.00 0.00 0.00 3,327.00 100 0.00 0,00
12690 FLOOA MATS 2,519.00 2,519.00 0.00 0.00 2,519.00 100 0_00 000
10520 FIRE EXTINGISHERS 1,200.00 1,200.00 0.00 0.00 1,200.00 100 0.00 000
12490 WINDOW BLINDS 1,871.01 1,871.01 0.00 0,00 1,871.01 100 0,00 0,00
10990 WARDROBE SPECIAL TIE 168.00 166.14 1,86 0.00 168.00 100 0.00 0,00
10440 $lGNSfFLAGPOLE 8,059,00 6,987.00 1,072.00 0.00 8,059.00 100 0,00 0,00
10990 FIREPLACE 2,629.65 2,629.65 0,00 0,00 2,629.65 100 0,00 0.00
11130 AUDIO VISUAL EOUIP 3,196.07 3,196.07 0,00 000 3,196.07 100 0.00 0,00
14200 ELEVATOR 37.060.00 36,900.00 160,00 0,00 37,060.00 100 0,00 0,00
15500 MECHANICAL 370,430.00 369,706.00 19,276.00) 0.00 360,430.00 97 iO,OOO.OO O.CO
15300 FIRE SPRINKLER 19,426.00 19.526.00 (100.00l 0.00 19,426.00 100 0.00 0.00
16000 ELECTRICAL 212,017.00 210,498.00 1,519.00 0,00 212,017.00 100 0.00 0_00
SUBTOTAL 2,928,288.73 2,886,328.22 10,239.16 0_00 2,896,567.38 99 31,721.35 7,543.63
FEE 177,788.20 185,787.87 (16,847,301 0.00 168,940.58 9S 8,847.62 9,640.40
TOTAL 3,106,076.93 3,072,116-.09 16,608.141 0,00 3,065,507.96- 99 40,568.97 17,184_03
.
"
RECEIVED
DEe 1 2 2002
ARGHITECTU;:;r,: /LL
WAIVER OF CONSTRUCTION LIEN, PAYMENT
BOND AND LIEN FUNDS
December 1, 2002
For good and valuable consideration, the undersigned hereby irrevocably and unconditionally waives and
releases any and all (a) rights and claims for a construction or other lien on land and buildings being
constructed, altered, erected or repaired and to the appurtenances thereunto, (b) rights and claims on any
payment boud(s) furnished in conjunction with said construction, alteration, erection or repair, and (c)
rights and claims for lien on money, bonds, or warrants due or to become due to the prime contractor
thcrefor. The property covered by this waiver is owned by the City of Arden Hills (owner), is located at
1245 West Highway 96, Arden Hills, MN is described as Arden Hills City Hall and this waiver pertains to
a portion of the work to be performed by Rochon Corporation (prime contractor),
This waiver covers all labor, material and supplies for construction, alteration, erection, and repairs
furnished by the undersigned under a contract with City of Arden Hills through the date of this waiver in
the amount of ONE HUNDRED TWENTY NINE THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED THIRTEEN AND
65/100 Dollars ($129,813.65)
This lien waiver is not valid until the amount listed above has been received.
."^,,,^^^^,,"^""f<^^^^^^^~~.
l I'~ I ~I;;C;GKARDT I
6~ L C - MI~INESOTA
\((>/- ~ ':< 1..;."i:<lrCS Jon. 31, 2005 By
~;;:;K~
Contractor Waiver Form
.
-'f"
j,,,
.
.
"
.
.
.
APPLICATION ANO CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT (SUBSTITUTE AlA DOCUMENT G702)
PAGE ONE OF 2 PAGES
TO IOWNER): City Of Arden Hllls
4364 Wes{ Round Lake Rd
Arden Hills, MN 55112.5794
PROJECT: Arden Hills City Hall
1245 West Highway 96
Arden Hills, MN 55112
FROM ICONTRACTORJ: Rochon Corporation
3650 Annapolis Lane North, Suite 101
Plymouth, MN 55447
APPLICATION NO: 18 (Revised)
PERIOD TO: 30-Nov-02
VIA IARCHITECT!: Architectural Alliance
400 Clifton Avenue S.
Minneapolis, MN 55403
ARCHITECT'S
PROJECT NO:
CONTRACT FOR: General Construction
CONTRACTOR'S APPLlCATtON FOR PAYMENT
CONTRACT DATE:
8/15/00
CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY
Change Orders approved in ADDITtONS DEDUCTIONS
previous months by Owner
TOTAL 139.528.93
Approved this Momh
Number Date Approved
6 1211712001 20,672.00
7 2/2512002 3,876.00
TOTALS 24.548.00
Nel cnange by Change Orders 164,076.93
The undersig:ned Contractor certifies that to the best of the Cornractor.s
knOWledge, information and belief the Work covered by this Application
for Pa'lment has been completed in accordance with the ContraCt
Documents:. that all amounts have been paid by the Contractor for Work fOI
whiCh previous Certificates fOI Paymem were issued and payments received
Irorn the Owner. and that cutrent payment shown herein is now due.
CONTRACTOR: R on Corporation
8,
Date: December 1, 2002
Jerry Srate
I
i.~^^^^^'~.
J~-~";"'_, GR..~.Cr:: L. CL!:iG;-~ARDT
~ NO,,',"y FU2L1C - MIe''vESOTA f
,." ~l,/ Comm, Expires JOIl. 31, 2005-
.
.
ARCHITECT'S CERTIFICATE fOR PAYMENT
In accorclance with the Contract Documents, based onon.site observations
and the data comprising the above application, the Architect cer tifies(othe
Owner that to tha best 01 the Architecrs knowledge, information and belief the
Work has progressed asindicated,thequality of the Work is in acc ordance
with the Contract Documents, and the ContraCtor ;$ emitled to payment
of the AMOUNT CERTIFIED.
Application is made for Payment, as shown below, in connection
with the Contract, Continuation Sheet, Substitute AlA Document'
0703 is attached.
1. ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM..
........$
2,942,000.00
164,076.93
3,106,076.93
3,065,507.96
2. Net Change by Change Orders..
3. CONTRACT SUM TO DATE (Line 1 +/.2)..
4. TOTAL COMPLETED & STORED TO DATE..
(Column G on G703)
S, RETAINAGE:
% of Completed Work
lColurnn D+E on G7031
% of Stored Material
IColumn F on G703)
Total Relainage IUne 5a+5b or
Tota) in Column I of G7031.. , 17,184.03
6 TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE.. 3,048,323.93
(Line 4 less line 5 Total)
7, LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR
PAYMENT lUne 6 from prior Certificate)..
2,918,510.28
129,813.65
57,753.00
8. CURRENT PAYMENT DUE..
9. 8ALANCE TO FINISH, PLUS RETAINAGE..
lline Jless Line 6)
,$
State of: Minnesota
County of: Hennepin
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 1 st day of December, 2002
AMOUNT CERTIFIED....... ..........................$
(Attach explaflation i1 amount certified differs from the amount a ppliedfor.!
ARCH'TECT, AAn-f17~ A<-L-tAfveF::
Bj~~", j}(IYoZ.
This certificate is not negotiable. The AMOUNT CERTIFIED is payable
only to the Contractor named herein. Issuance, payment and acceptance
of payment are without prejudice to any rights of the Owner or Contractor
under this Contract.
.
PAGE 2 OF 2
.
CONTINUATION SHEET
Substitute AlA Document G703
Arden Hills City Hall
TO:
CONTRACTOR'S PROJECT NO:
181R9visedl
'.Oec.02
'_Ma)'.02
30-NDV-02
0028
APPLICATION NUMBER:
APPLICATION DATE:
PERIOD FROM:
SCHEDULED PREVIOUS THIS STORED TOTAL BALANCE
CODE DESCRIPTION VALUE APPLICATION APPLICATION MATERIAL TO DATE % rOFINISH RETAINAGE
01000 GEN'l RQMTS 161,250.09 150,872.59 0.00 0.00 150,872.59 100 377.50 7,543.63
02200 EARTHWORK 68,897.00 88,897.00 0,00 000 68,897.00 100 0.00 0.00
02460 LANDSCAPING 3.9,122.00 31,477.00 (8,B9B.851 0.00 22,778.15 5' 16,343.85 000
02513 ASPHALT PAVING 57,252.00 57,252.00 0,00 0.00 57,252.00 100 000 0,00
02600 SITE UTILITIES 143.700.00 143,433.00 267.00 0.00 143,700,00 100 0,00 0.00
04200 CONCRETE/MASONRY 843,023.00 840,471.00 2,552.00 0.00 843,023.00 100 0.00 O.CO
03410 PRECAST CONCRETE 44,565,00 44,565.00 0.00 0,00 44,565.00 100 0.00 0_00
05100 STEEL FABRICATION 108,087.50 108,166.50 (79.001 0.00 108,087.50 100 0.00 0.00
05MO STEEL ERECTION 75,739.50 76,14-7.50 (408.00) 0.00 75,739.50 100 0,00 0.00
05500 EXPANSIN JT COVERS 2,000.00 571.11 1,428.89 0.00 2,000.00 100 000 0.00
06100 CARPENTRY 219,104.00 208,928.00 10,176.00 0,00 219,104.00 100 0,00 0.00
06400 MILLWORK 66,170.00 65,622.74 547.26 0,00 66,170.00 100 0,00 0.00
07160 WATER?ROOFING 10.000,00 10,000.00 0,00 0.00 10,000.00 100 0,00 0,00
07241 EIFS 1.482.00 0.00 1.482.00 0.00 1,482.00 100 0.00 0,00
07530 ROOF~NG 63,060.00 62,670.00 390.00 0.00 63,060.00 100 0.00 0.00
07900 CAULKING 6.714.00 6,714,00 0,00 0.00 6,714.00 100 0.00 000
08100 HMiDOORS/HAROWARE 32,B20.00 31.465,00 1,355.00 0.00 32,820.00 100 0.00 0.00
08360 OH DeDAS/AUTO OPEA 6,681.00 6,031.00 650.00 0.00 6,681.00 100 0.00 0,00
08&00 ALUM STOREFRONT 200,213.00 198,578.00 1,635.00 0.00 200,213.00 100 0,00 0,00
09300 CERAMIC/QUARRY TILE 39.545.00 34,545.00 0.00 0.00 34,645.00 87 5,000.00 000
09500 ACOUSTICAL CEILING TI 18,913.00 18,565.00 348.00 0.00 18,913.00 100 000 0.00
09680 CARPTEV1NYL TILE. 43,632.00 38,422.00 5,210.00 0.00 43,632.00 100 000 0.00
09900 PAINTiNG 16,550.00 16,543.00 7.00 0.00 16,550.00 100 0,00 0,00
10900 ACCESS PANELS 437,08 437.08 0.00 0.00 437.08 100 0.00 0,00
10200 LOUVERS 1,900.00 1,900.00 0.00 0.00 1,900.00 100 0,00 0,00
10100 V:SUAL QISPLAY BOARD 1,075.00 1,075.00 0.00 000 1,075.00 100 000 0.00
10160 TOILET PARTITIONS 4,453.83 4,453.83 0.00 0.00 4,453.83 100 0.00 0.00
10800 TOILET ACCESSORIES 3,327.00 3,327.00 0.00 0,00 3,327.00 100 0.00 0.00
12690 FLOOR MATS 2.519.00 2,519.00 000 000 2,519.00 100 0.00 0.00
10520 FIRE EXTINGISHERS 1,200.00 1,200.00 0,00 0,00 1,200.00 100 0,00 0,00
12490 WINDOW SUNDS 1.871.01 1,871.01 0.00 0,00 1,871.01 100 0.00 0,00
10990 WARDROBE SPECIAL TIE 168.00 166.14 1.86 000 168.00 100 0,00 0,00
10440 SIGNS/FLAGPOLE 8,059.00 6,981.00 1,012.00 0.00 8,059.00 100 0,00 0.00
10990 FIREPLACE 2,629.65 2,629.65 0.00 0.00 2,629.65 100 0,00 0.00
11130 UOIQ VISUAL EQUIP 3,196.07 3.196.07 0,00 0.00 3,196.07 100 0,00 0,00
14200 ELEVATOR 37,060.00 36,900.00 160.00 0.00 37,060.00 >00 0.00 000
15500 MECHANICAL 370.430.00 369.706.00 (9,276.00) 0,00 360,430.00 97 10,000.00 0,00
15300 FIRE SPRINKLER 19.426.00 19.526.00 (100.00) 0.00 19,426.00 100 0.00 0,00
16000 ELECTRICAL 212,017.00 210,498.00 1,519.00 0.00 212,017,00 100 0.00 000
SUBTOTAL 2,928,288.73 2.886,328.22 10,239.16 0_00 2,896,567.38 99 31,721.35 7,543.63
FEE 177,788.20 185,787.87 (16.847.30) 0.00 168,940.58 9S 8,847.62 9,640.40
TOTAL 3,106,076.93 3,072,116.09 (6,608.14) 0,00 3,065,507.96 99 40,568.97 17,184.03
.
.
.12/11/02_15: 1J_.!'AX
ARCHITECTURAL ALLIANCE ~ ARDEN HILLS
1I!I00l/002
.
~_'O'D'RN~
Project Arden Hills City Hall
] 245 West Hwy 96
Arden Hills. M N 551 12
ARCHITECTURAL ALLIANCE
Date: December 1 I, 2002
Comm No: 1997149
To Contraclo~ Rochon COlpOl'ation
Suite 101
3650 Annapolis Lane North
Plymouth, MN 55447
Rochon # 0028
Owne~ City 01 Arden Hills
Arden Hills City HaIl
Round Lake Business CenteT
4364 W, Round Lake Road
Anien Hills. MN 55112.5794
It is mutually ag,eed tbalWbelllhi:s <llangeOrderbas been signed by the Owner, AlI::hitecl,and Contractor, the IoUowibg
described changes shall be executed by the Contrador ""d shall change Ibe Contract as berein stipulale,L
. Architects Supplemental Acoustical ceiling tile in community room (B09),
Instroctions "3 clarification of 18 x 18 supply duct M.3 $733,00
An:hiledS Supplemental Clarifying detail relating to Cashing delail at the
,!nstmctioDS#7 first and second level curtain walls, $645 ~Q
Miscellaneous Cost,. 39 F & I smoke baJ1Ies at elevator lobbies $1 ,gOB, 00
Miscellaneous Cost#45 Furnish and install elevator equipment sign. $72,00
FUrnish and install one time delay
Miscellaneous Cost # 56 module/sequencer at the lront entry doolS $439,00
Credit for corkboaro in lieu of fabric cover
Miscellaneous Cost" 60 panel. ($300,00)
Miscellaneous Cost"" 61 Added erosion control measure; $7,81500
Credit for nol supplying heavy-duty disconnect ($20000)
Miscellaneous CDsI" 62 switches.
Additional sill trim for interior windows sills on
Miscellaneous Cost ,. 63 noTthwest openings, $387.00
".
~~??}~f~o.'::'~~~en\le South, Minheapoli5, Minnesota, 55403~3299. Tel: (612)871-5703, Fax:
~.......
12/11/02 15:13 FAX
ARCHITECTURAL ALLIANCE 4 ARDEN HILLS
IgJOO2l002
Change Order NO, 8
Arden Hills City Hall
1997149
M~,~enaneous Cost'" 64
Champagne anod~d column cover at radiation
covers
Miscellaneous Cost" 65
Meti!!J!~.iM1!t retaining W1l.Il
$323,00
Miscellaneous Cost ~~!;,~-I. Sand Import and drain tile
$266,00
$12,724.00
TOTAL
Allachmenls: AS!" 3.4, 7; Miscellaneous costs: 39. 44, 45. 56. 60... 65. 66 and 67
$24,712,00
Original Contract Sum $
Net Change by Previou.sJy Approved Change Orders $
9.()ntlael Sum prior to this Change Order $
Contract Sum will be increased by this Change Order S
New Contrnct Sum including this Change Order $
Contract Time win be unchanged by this Change Order........,.......,.........................,..........,.......
2,942,000.00
164,076.93
3,I06,076.~_" ,
24.71 Z.OO
3,130.788.03
........"..."....0 days
Approved For:
ArchItectural Alliance
By:
Rochon Corporation
By;
City 01 Arden Hills
By:
Title:
Title:
Title:
Date:
Dale;
Date:
~_o~_ C~~f~D~~~~enue South. Minneapolts, Minnesota.. 50403-3299, Tel: (612)871-5703, fax:
.... ,
.
,
.
.
.: