Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCCP 09-08-2003 ~. Mayor: Beverly Aplikowski ~ ~HlLLS Arden Hills City Council REGULAR MEETING Monday September 8, 2003 1245 W. Highway % Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112 651.634.5120 Conncilmembers: David Grant Brenda Holden Gregg Larson Lois Rem City Vision A strong coonnunity that values our unique environment, our fiscal soundness, and our tradition as a desirable ci in which to live. work, and la . Agenda City Council Meeting Convenes 7:00 PM CaD to Order PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE MAYOR APLIKOWSKI: INTRODUCTION OF ADMINISTRATOR MICHELLE WOLFE 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 2. APPROVAL OF MINUlES A. August 25, 2003 Council Meeting 3. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Claims and Payroll Those items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion under a Consent Calendar fonnat. There will be no separate discussion of these items, unless a Council Member so requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda. 4. PUBLIC INQUlRIESIINFORMA TIONAL Public Inquiries/Informational is an opportunity for citizens to bring to the Council's attentiou any items not cwrently on the agenda. In addressing the Council. please state your name and address for the re<:ord, and a brief summary of the specific item being addressed to the Council. To allow adequate time for each person wishing to address the Council, we ask that individuals limit their coonneuts to three (3) minutes. " Arden Hills City Council Agenda September 8, 2003 Page 2 Written documents may be distributed to the Council prior to the meeting, or as bench copies, to allow a more timely presentation. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS 6. COMMUNITY SERVICES Aaron Parrish A. Planning Case No. 01-05: Chesapeake Master Plan-PUD Aaron Parrish Extension B. i. Resolution No. 03-57: Setting Preliminary Levy for 2004 Aaron Parrish ii. Resolution No. 03-58: Adopting Truth in Taxation Hearing Dates C. Planning Case No. 03-03: Peter Hellegers Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning 7. OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE Thomas J. Moore A. Cummings Park Shelter Design Aaron Parrish 8. ADMINISTRATION Michelle Wolfe CITY COUNCIL REPORTS A. Councilmember Holden B. Councilmember Larson C. Councilmember Rem D. Councilmember Grant E. Mayor Aplikowski . Arden Hills City Council Agenda September 8, 2003 Page 3 !LPcomin2 Meetin2s and Events Monday Sentember 15 Council Work Session City Hall 4:45 p.m. Tuesday September 23 Parks, Trails and City Hall 7:00 p.rn. Recreation Committee Wednesday September 24 TCAAP Master City Hall 7:00 p.rn. Planning Advisory Panel Monday September 29 Council Meeting City Hall 7:00n.m. Tuesday September 30 Neighborhood Meeting City Hall 7:30 p.m. - Precinct 1 Council Chambers Wednesday October 1 Newsletter Committee City Hall 5:30 p.m. NOTE CHANGE IN TIME Tuesday October 7 Neighborhood Meeting City Hall 7:30 p.m. - - Precinct 2 Council Chambers Tuesday October 21 Neighborhood Meeting City Hall 7:30 p.m. - Precinct 3 Council Chambers Tuesday October 28 Neighborhood Meeting City Hall 7 :30 p.m. - Precinct 4 Council Chambers . ~' . . . ~ ~HILLS MEETING MINUTES DRAFT CITY OF ARDEN IDLLS, MINNESOTA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 25, 2003, 7:00 P.M. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 1245 WEST IDGHW A Y 96 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE CALL TO ORDERlROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Beverly Aplikowski called to order the regular City Council meeting at 7:02 p.m. Present: Mayor Beverly Aplikowski, Councilmembers David Grant, Gregg Larson, and Lois Rem. Absent: Councilmember Brenda Holden. Also present were Interim City AdministratorlDirector of Community Services, Aaron Parrish; City Attorney, Jerry Filla; Deputy Clerk/Human Resources Director, Cynthia Young; Operations and Maintenance Director, Thomas J. Moore; City Engineer, Nick Landwer; City Planner, Pete Hellegers; and Recording Secretary, Kathleen Altman. 1. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA MOTION: Councilmember Larson moved and Councilmember Grant seconded a motion to approve the meeting agenda as presented. The motion carried unanimously (4-0). 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. July 28, 2003 Council Meeting B. August 18,2003 Council Work Session Councilmember Grant requested the following changes: None. ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES AUGUST 25, 2003 ~ 2 . Councilmember Rem requested the following changes: Page 4, July 28, 2003 Council Meeting Minutes, insert the Councilmember who made the motion at the bottom of the page (Councilmember Holden). August 18, 2003 Council Work Session, note the adjournment time at 10:29 p.m. Councilmember Larson requested the following changes: Page 10, July 28, 2003 Council Meeting, second paragraph, second to the last sentence, delete the word "where". Mayor Aplikowski requested the following changes: None. Mr. Parrish requested the following changes: None. MOTION: Councilmember Grant moved and Councilmember Rem seconded a motion to approve the July 28, 2003 City Council Meeting Minutes and August 18, 2003 Council Work Session as amended. The . motion carried unanimously (4-0). 3. CONSENT CALENDAR a. Claims and Payroll b. Payment #2: Arnt/2003 PMP Ingerson/Karth Lake c. FINAL PAYMENT: 2003 Sealcoating d. Payment # 1: Lift Station Nos. 2 & 5 e. Payment #7: 2002 Sanitary Sewer f. Payment #4: FINAL 2002 PMP Hunters Court and Waldon Place g. Personnel Policy: Amendments h. Cummings Park Drive Water Main 1. Josephine East LLC: Release of Easement MOTION: Councilmember Larson moved and Councilmember Grant seconded a motion to approve the Consent Calendar and to authorize execution of all necessary documents contained therein. The motion carried unanimously (4-0). . . . . ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES AUGUST 25, 2003 3 4. PUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL Tom Lynch, 3220 North Hamline, stated he was at the meeting to note inconveniences regarding the construction on Highway 96 and Hamline. He stated his phone line had been cut; no mail for two days; the gas line was hit in front of his driveway; he could not get into his driveway for nine days; and he did not receive the required 24 hour notice before blocking his driveway. He indicated the apron in front of his driveway yet had not been installed and he was originally told they would only be unable to get into his driveway for one day. He indicated the dust was very bad, as well. He stated the ditch also needed to be cleaned in his area. Mr. Parrish noted staff would follow-up on these concerns and report to the Council at its next meeting. Mr. Landwer stated the ditch was a MNDOT ditch and staff had been in contact with them about cleaning it out. Mayor Aplikowski introduced City Administrator, Michelle Wolfe. 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS None. 6. COMMUNITY SERVICES A. Planning Case No. 03-18: Insty-Prints Sign Variance Mr. Hellegers stated applicant was requesting a Sign Standard Adjustment from the Signage Ordinance criteria for a freestanding sign along County Road E. He noted the Planning Commission recommended approval of this request with conditions as noted in staffs August 25,2003 report. Councilmember Grant asked whose responsibility was it to fix the barrier pole that was knocked down. Mr. Hellegers replied he was not sure whose responsibility it was to repair this barrier pole, but he would follow-up on this. Councilmember Grant requested the barrier pole be repaired. He also requested staff determine whose responsibility it was to maintain the grass in this area and make sure it was maintained. Mr. Moore stated it was the County's responsibility ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES AUGUST 25, 2003 4 . to cut and maintain the grass in this area. He noted the County had stated they would cut the grass only as time permitted and now the City had taken over some of the maintenance on County property. He stated it appeared the businesses along County Road E maintained the front strip of grass, even though it was County property. Councilmember Larson summarized the concerns of the Planning Connnission regarding All American Engineering. MOTION: Councilmember Larson moved and Councilmember Grant seconded a motion to approve Planning Case No. 03-18: Insty-Prints, 1207 County Road E, Sign Standard Adjustment, with the conditions as outlined in staff's August 25, 2003 report. The motion carried unanimously (4-0). B. Planning Case No. 03-19: Mohn Shoreland Variance Mr. I1ellegers stated applicant was requesting a nine-foot variance to the . Lakeshore setbacks established in the Zoning Ordinance and the Shoreland Management Ordinance. He indicated the Planning Connnission recommended approval of this request with conditions as outlined in staff's August 25, 2003 report. MOTION: Councilmember Grant moved and Councilmember Larson seconded a motion to approve Planning Case No. 03-19: Carolyn Mohn, 3459 Siems Court, Lakeshore Setback Variance with the conditions as outlined in staff's August 25, 2003 report. The motion carried unanimously (4-0). 7. OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE A. Authorize to Advertise for bids: Lift Station #7 Mr. Landwer stated Lift Station #7 was located in the southwest comer of Lake Josephine in the Presbyterian Homes property. He indicated the existing lift station is of the old "can style" design and would be improved to be a submersible ... pump design. He noted this project was discussed at a recent work session as a .. candidate to take advantage of the favorable bid climate and utilize funds allocated . . . ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES AUGUST 25, 2003 5 for lift station rehabilitation in 2003 and not encumbered by the Lift Station #2 and #5 rehabilitation project. He indicated the estimated project cost for Lift Station #7 was $1 10,000, which would be funded entirely by the City Sanitary Sewer Utility. He stated the project is planned to be combined with the Karth Lake Pumping Improvements for bidding with the intention of realizing some cost savings through economy of scale. He noted the City Engineer recommended the advertisement for construction bids for this station. MOTION: Councilmember Grant moved and Councilmember Larson seconded a motion to authorize to advertise for bids for Lift Station #7. The motion carried unanimously (4-0). B. Resolution No. 03-55: Authorizing the Creation of the Karth Lake Improvement District & Set Public Hearing Mr. Parrish stated consistent with previous Council's direction, the Resolution approved the preliminary engineering study necessary to establish a Lake Improvement Oistrict around Karth Lake. In addition, a date for the public hearing to establish the district was also set. He noted it was necessary to give the DNR 40 days notice prior to the public hearing creating the district. He indicated to meet this deadline and still have the hearing on September 29, the engineering report was forwarded to the DNR on August 20. He stated if all goes according to plan, the district should be created and the bid for the project awarded at the September 29 meeting. Councilmember Larson asked what the lake level had dropped to since their last discussion. Mr. Moore replied the lake was going down 1/10th of an inch a day. Councilmember Larson asked for clarification on the Lake Improvement District's responsibilities and asked how long would the District last. Mr. Filla replied the District would continue until Council decided it was no longer necessary. Councilmember Larson noted ,he hoped the District was disbanded once the assessments were paid for. He stated he believed the City should not get involved in trying to oversee the interest of the lakeshore property owners. He noted it was better if the residents set up their own association and not the City. ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES AUGUST 25, 2003 6 . MOTION: Councilmember Grant moved and Councilmember Rem seconded a motion to approve Resolution No. 03-55: Authorizing the creation of the Karth Lake Improvement District and set a public hearing. The motion carried unanimously (4-0). 8. ADMINISTRATION A. Resolution No. 03-54: Ramsey County Library/Arden Hills Branch Mr. Parrish stated based on previous Council direction, staff had prepared a draft resolution for Council review and approval. If approved, staff would forward the resolution to the Ramsey County Board of Commissioners and the Ramsey County Library Board to initiate further discussions. Councilmember Rem asked if a Councilor staff member should present this Resolution to the Library Board in person. Mary Ann Lindberg, 1695 Brauberry Lane, stated it would be a good idea to . have this Resolution presented to the Library Board in person at their next meeting. She noted she had spoken to a member of the Mounds View School Board and also the Mounds View City Council for their support in keeping this library open. MOTION: Councilmember Larson moved and Councilmember Grant seconded a motion to approve Resolution No. 03-54, A Resolution Opposing the Closure of the Arden Hills Library. The motion carried unanimously (4-0). B. Resolution No. 03-56: A Resolution Opposing Closure of the Suburban Court Mr. Filla stated Ramsey County District Court was contemplating closure of the Maplewood Court to consolidate with its Law Enforcement Center in St. Paul. This resolution would oppose the closure of this Court and request the Court to examine possible solutions. He suggested directing the Resolution to the County Board. . . . . ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES AUGUST 25, 2003 7 MOTION: Councilmember Grant moved and Councilmember Larson seconded a motion to approve Resolution No. 03-56, a Resolution Opposing the Closure of the Maplewood Suburban Court and Requesting Ramsey County District Court Cooperatively Examine Possible Solutions. The motion carried unanimously (4-0). CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Mr. Parrish - Stated the City staff would be going back to non-summer hours of 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. starting September 2,2003. Councilmember Larson - Stated the Lake Johanna Fire Department now had a Board that governed the Fire Department. He noted the cities also had a Board through a Joint Powers Board, and there was a proposal to join the two Boards so there was only one Board, which he believed was a good idea. He thanked Mr. Parrish and the rest of the staff for their hard work during the transition time before the new City Administrator begins. Mr. Parrish noted all staff members had picked up extra work and also thanked the staff. Councilmember Larson - Stated he would be on vacation on September 30 and October 7, when the neighborhood meetings were scheduled. Councilmember Rem - Stated the Newsletter Committee was meeting this Wednesday. She noted there was a TCAAP tour also on Wednesday and on Thursday night the Advisory Panel was meeting. Councilmember Grant - Stated the PTRC was not meeting in August. He asked for an update on the Maintenance Facility from staff. Mr. Parrish replied they were waiting for draft documents, which they had not yet received. Councilmember Grant asked for an update on the underpass project. Mr. Moore replied the County had moved this project to next spring due to difficulties with the railroad easement. Mayor Aplikowski - Thanked Mr. Parrish for his hard work and staff for picking up extra work during the transition time. She stated she had a request from the Shoreview History Group for a Council picture. She asked staff for recommendations regarding this. ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES AUGUST 25, 2003 Ms. Young - Thanked Mr. Parrish for his leadership during the past seven months and welcomed Ms. Wolfe to the City. Mayor Aplikowski adjourned the Regular City Council Meeting at 8:27 p.m. Beverly Aplikowski Mayor Aaron Parrish Interim City Administrator NOTICE OF MEETINGS The next Council Meeting will be held Monday, September 8, 2003 at 7:00 p.m. in the Arden Hills Council Chambers. 8 . . . r . . . ~ ~ EN HILLS MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: September 3, 2003 Agenda Item 3.A Mayor Beverly Aplikowski Council Member David Grant Council Member Brenda Holden Council Member Gregg Larson Council Member Lois Rem Sandy Berres, Finance & Human Resources Assistant ~ Claims & Payroll Attached: Claims Payroll for period': (08/09/03-08/22/03) . . . , CITY OF ARDEN HILLS ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CLAIMS REPORT TO BE APPROVED AT 09/0SI03 COUNCIL MEETING PAGE 1 OF2 CLAIMS PAID SINCE LAST COUNCIL MEETING 108J25I03l :';';"*,'io,';<;I:':<:l<i"""'nn;:,:~ijjt:,,,,: .... ;.:;:.:;:.;.: : :~j5: j;: >:,::::;~;H!:,:,til~S:"::"::::':"""'-'-' ........;.;.;.;.;.;.;.; ....... 23988 08/25/03 Peterson, Fram & B"",",.n P A 3760.19 lulv Le.al Fees 23989 08/25/03 URS Comoration 70 503.25 June Emrineerinll Fees 23990 08/25103 Xeel Enervv 2 522.08 Electric/Gas Service 23991 08/25103 Affmitv Plus Federal Credit Union 3 988.87 Third AuO".,t Pa"""lI 23992 08/26/03 Acclaim Benefits 636.42 MedicallDavcare Reimbursement 23993 08/26/03 Arndt Construction 592,874.75 Pa #2-2003 PMP 23994 08/26/03 Northern Escrow lIav Bras,l 115025.29 Pa I-Lift #5 & Lift #2-2003 San Sewer 23995 08126/03 Pearson Bros. Inc. 33,056.76 Final Pav-2003 Seal Costin!! Pmlect 23996 08/26/03 T.A. Schifskv & Son. Inc. 9,794.01 Pav #4-2002 PMP 23997 08126/03 Visu-5ewer Clean & Seal Inc. 10,259.76 Pav #8-2002 San Sewer Rehab 23998 09102103 Sam's Club 30.00 2003 Membershin Fee Sub_I - Paid Claims 842,451.38 Paid Claims From Above - 842,451.38 Add Unpaid Claims, Page 2 - 134.749.97 Total Accounts Payable Qaims for Council Approval, 09108103- 977,201.35 Note: Checks for unpaid claims totaling $346,319.06 were mailed August 26. 2003 after approval at the August 25, 2003 Council Meeting. They were check nmnbers 23906-23981. ~_ Related to TCAAP Project -,.-~] " CITY OF ARDEN HILLS ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CLAIMS REPORT TO BE APPROVED AT 09/08/03 COUNCIL MEETING PAGH20F2 . UNPAID CLAIMS REGISTER: , "'eIt~",,'I"'i'E'n;m;;,, " ,~!,/jlWb>' ..............-. ................................ .............. ............. """"""""",'I'",'MiiQW:r""IH""mmi( ~:::,:::; :~:!:~: ~~! ::::: :::: !:! :~:~::: :::~:j~~:h ::;:;:::!. h: 23999 09/09/03 Accurate Press,lne 834.97 Envelones/Business Cards.MW 24000 09109103 Anlmark Uniform Service 35.06 Ruo Cleanino-GH 24001 09/09/03 Almlund Snuires Construction 321.75 Refund,Buildino Permit #803,8514 24002 09/09/03 Bartels, Anne 41.00 Refund-CO-Rec Soccer 24003 09/09/03 Bell Fred 132.94 2003 Uniform Purchase 24004 09/09/03 Construction Bulletin M-a-~~ 156.52 Bid Advertisement-Lift #7 24005 09109/03 O;;;;-onrte E-s 465.59 Office Sunolies 24006 09/09/03 Coverall of the Twin Cities 1.238.60 CH Cleanin. Service 24007 09/09/03 Diemer. Christnnber 114.87 MilegOl" Reimbursement-PJaVOTnunds 24008 09/09/03 Douvier Kathv 36.00 Refund-Co-Rec Soccer 24009 09109/03 Tlrvden ExcavatinO' 41.141.00 H~96 Utilitv~ 24010 09/09/03 DS Productions I 878.93 AMX Services-GC Chambers 24011 09109/03 Edina Relocation 64.35 Ovemavment.Fina! DB AC#24930 24012 09109/03 Fast S~ 17.85 Name Plates-MW 24013 09/09/03 Flexible 'PinP Tool C01"\"manV 49 948.50 Pineline Televis;no S~tem 24014 09109/03 Fortis Benefits 1.056.22 Looo TermlShort Term Disabilitv Ins. 24015 09109103 Fl"f"VbP'l"O..... Scott 69,98 2003 Uniform Purchase 24016 09109/03 aanunell Kenneth 159.74 Cable SlInnlies-Reimbursernent 24017 09109/03 r.;;;J,er s;;;;rt 837.14 Soccer t 24018 09/09/03 10-5. c;;;ital 3.819.68 Conier Lease 24019 09109/03 Kinko's 33,81 Flver Cuttino . 24020 09/09/03 Lakes Countrv Service C"~tive 5,748.17 Health msurance 24021 09109/03 Lillie Suburban Neunna-nPN 112.79 Auo-lIst LecrAl Notices 24022 09/09/03 Miller Lisa 35.00 Refund-Preschool Soccer 24023 09109/03 Moore, Thomas 410.40 Mi1ea~e Reiinbursement 24024 09/09/03 NCPERS Groun Life Insurance 60.00 Sertt PERA Life Insurance 24025 09109/03 Nextel Connnunications 634.20 Cellular Phone Service 24026 09/09/03 Pace Analvtieal 421.00 Water Testino- 24027 09109103 Panish Aaron 52.44 Milea~ Reimbursement 24028 09/09/03 Pi.n;;-Bowes 261.74 Postage Meter Rent 24029 09109/03 Purchase Power 1437.24 PostaQ:e-Meter 24030 09109/03 Rarnse;;- Counn, 22.855.39 Hwv 96 Utilitv U.....de 24031 09109/03 Safeh,-kIeen ]23.]6 Hazardous Waste Disnosa! 24032 09/09/03 Saxe, StPnhen 69.98 2003 Uniform Purchase 24033 09/09/03 Winkel, David ]23.96 2003 Uniform Purchase Subtotal - J mn"id Claims - p;.;e 2 134,749.97 . . . -' ~ 1; [ ~ f ~,. [ n' 9- v.. ~ ~~ i l i i <1 " = ~ f S' H.f ~ ~ ~. ':; " Ii ~ ~ : I/' ~. ~ i g> . ~ ~. ~ i ~ I tr :!r I r:g [ Gl "". g li a > ~ 0' . f :;: fi' ~ t ~ [ ~ &: ~ '" ~ = .....:. ii, ~ a :;: > " " ~ .-- " :!l .... :. "- ~ (') 2 "- > .... . ..... > ~ lS lS .... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;: ~ --. " 0 ~ ~ " " 8 is '" .... ~ ~ ~ ~ .... . .... a ~ ;; ;; ;; ;; ;; ;; a ~ ;; ........ ;.:::~ " a ~ ~ a t :€ ~ ~ " a a a 6: 6: g 6: g " " " ~ " " ~R ~ " ~ ~ Il: t t; ~ ~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " " " ~ " " :.:"" ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N " -- f f. 0 i f! I :!! '" :;; J .~ i I f f '" '" i J ;p z il' '" r "" ~ r Gl r " i ~ g, if i - j o. J' u" tI ~ g ." i '" ffi F ~ u i ~ :;: I ;p [ f r " " ~ > g> ~ ~ g ii .. :;: ~ :;: ~. S' ~ ~ ~ r S' ~ W. ." ~ ." "- ~ .. s. ~ .. . eo . . .r:~: . - [ f .. p. ~ s; ~ ~ If : 0- . .. .... li . .... .... .-- #' .-- "'. - ~ - ~ - N ~ - - t ~ - - ~ - - jo,a.: ;: ;: ~ ~ ~ ::1 ~ t; oj ~ ~ ~ l1 t ~ is ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ b '" N ~ i ~ ~ ~ IS ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ::! ~ ~ ~ III ~ " ? 0 0 ~ 0 ~ " ~ " ~ ~ ~ ,.. ~ ~ ~ ~ ? ~ fl 8 OJ g 0 8 8 8 8 '--' ~ 'f ~ :;: 1l '" .., ~ ;; '" '" ~ '" ~ " is 8 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " --. i --- -- - - - :;; ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v; ~ ~ '" " :t g ~ v. ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ i;l ~ ~ ~ ~ ill iil ~ :;; ~ ~ 0 0 0 ~ ~ " " ~ 0 ~ 0 0 0 ? 0 0 0 0 " 8 iil " " " i:l " e ~ 'l: .., '" .., ... '--' l; '--' '" '" 8 :;: g 8 " :;: 8 -- ~ ~ ~ " " ~ ~ 0 N ~ 0 0 ~ ~ .~.~~. N N N ~ IS ::1 lS ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N ~ N ;:: ~ N ~ ~ ~ 0 " ~ " ~ 0 0 ? ~ ~ " 0 " " ~ ~ " ~ " ~ " " " '" '" :;: :;: 8 8 '" 8 8 8 8 :;: '" 8 g '" 8 '--' :;: 8 8 8 --- " " 0 " " ~ .. -- ;: N " ~ -- :;: '" 8 " ..~ " ~ ill I ~ ~ ~ :;' ... ... ~ N t lS ~ = lS :;; ~ ~ :;; ~ --i i N i i ~ i i i i i i i i i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ... -- [ ~ ~ ~ :'l ." ~ ." ~ --. -- CJ CJ -- --. i g --- N ~. i (') --. ... c --. -- .-- --. -- .-- ~ c .... ~ ~ ~ I ~ e. 0; It ~ ~ ~ :;; ~ ~ ~ ~ ." . ~ i Ii' Ii' ~ !;; ! ~ ~ I ~ . . i! ~ I;: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 ~ ~ " " ~ " 8 g 8 '" g " ~ " ~ t 0 " " t " " ... '" '" 8 ~ '" '" ~ " " ~ " " . Ii' ~ ~ ..... N ~:. ~ ;; ~:: ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ -0,;.:. " ~ 0 ~ 8 t ~ ~ 8 '" ~.: ~ ~ ~ if: [ ~ ." Eii ~ if :l' ::t. ~. IV a i' '" ~ m c ~. 0 'N:'; - ~:. ~ ~ II.:. 0 ;; ;: Io'ol"; '" g ;; ~:.: " -..;;;:: N ~... " " " ~ ~ 8 8 '" ." N ~ '" '" ." '" ~ ~ ~ ~ > > i I ( I w if if I' (') I a. Ii i 9 ::::. i:' ~ tS ~ " " 0 ~'. g g '" is ~:. " I ~ ~ ~ ~. " " " ~ g g g " ~ o ~ o "Tl ~ C m z ~ , , II> ~:i! iii - ..;0 =-c -<'> . c 00 l!;c a~ 't'-u ~~ ";0 ~o .., -, 0 :z: l'l i:i ~ 0 0 CD i3 ~::: N ~ .-- ~ .. ;!. ~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ \0"; :. " .., " --. ~:.: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;:u ~::: N .. ~ ~ . ~ .!! -- ~ " " hI.'; :. " g g ~:.: ~ ~ . . . ~ ~HILLS MEMORANDUM DATE: Agenda Item 6.A. September 3, 2003 TO: Mayor Beverly Aplikowski Council Member David Grant Council Member Brenda Holden Council Member Gregg Larson Council Member Lois Rem Aaron Parrish, Director of Community Services A' FROM: SUBJECT: Planning Case #01-05 - Chesapeake Companies Master Plan PUD Extension Request ENCLOSURES: 1. Location Map 2. August, 2003 Letter from Pete Carlson 3. August, 2003 to ATS Representatives Overview Enclosed for the Council's review is a request by Chesapeake Companies for an extension of the previously approved Master Plan PUD. Currently, the Zoning Ordinance indicates that a final approval must be obtained within six months, or the master plan approval is void. As Council will recall Chesapeake requested, and the Council granted, a one year extension last September. At that time, the owners of ATS Steel indicated that the zoning approval was limiting their ability to sell their property. At that time, the City indicated, and presumably the Council would continue to indicate that the City would prefer that Chesapeake acquire the property without City involvement. Further, as has always been the case, if Chesapeake and ATS could not come to mutually agreeable tenns that ATS is free to sell to any willing buyer. Staff sent a letter to A TS Steel representatives informing them of the extension request. Staff has conferred with the City Attorney, and he indicated that there were no significant legal implications if the extension were to be granted again. You will note that Chesapeake is requesting a 24 month extension. Since our development regulations could change over a 2 year period, staff would suggest a 12 month extension. Requested Action 1. In Planning Case 01-05 staff recommends approval ofa 12 month extension for submitting a Final Plan PUD. =:~~;~::~-=::==:_::-':~~~~~:::,~:ii~~:r~ // '! ,! \~ .', 11,:\ ,f" ,~\\ .// . Ii ":\" /;e~\iif1l(~>~;\, Ii 1"', li'~ __ ~~!~!"" ; Ii I, ,_~/;~" . ,':' -'--'-:/~-:-~:l~:W=:::::~-=::::::: '/11, I, 'I \\? /" . [:; "' .,; <q <ON",!! m..-COc: ~~:ijij~ C~Zu.:2: W.-::t &. 'E!:I: '0-" <C-~N"E ~ $=_ w O:>:I:IO . :> 0'6 #1'", ~~~. v..~'" N "" - l2 ~ ~ Q. c: .2 Q. 1i'" o~ ..J - Q) Q) LL o o <0 -.- o o co b o co II ...- iD "ffi 0 (,) C/) o o co ti ~Sj f~~[db h[u;;;o& "ti~U~!! ~j~~;g~: . ~1li:5~H g 'iiilEhj~ o ~~Q.o hl ~ l ~ nl~hh ~ !~d~h.~ ~ j~~Uu} a. 8ji! i ~u OJ S ci8ij,,~ ~ II~!~ !if ~ njj~~.i~ m ~]~"~i8= .!!~~0Il'!;:n5: !!2 ~'~"H~li t? ij~jjb~~"i ~ :inn~j~ :::l ~<:la-!!'6,,:Sb 8 ~~~go~!C;~ >. ~"~~~~*"" III d~"iHi! E ~/:lBO'l5~l.2". ~ dmHH ii .iHI~lj:~ l:! ~Hh ~E! - ~"A~~~!~~ . ~8 ~~il~';^ : ~W~-~~m ~s.!:!~li-Q~ . . . August 22, 2003 RECEIVEDl AUG 2 5 Z003 I CITY OF ARDEN HillS I Mr. Aaron Parrish City Planner City of Arden Hills 1245 West Highway 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112-5794 RE: Interstate Crossing - Arden Hills Dear Aaron: We respectfully ask for your consideration in our request to extend our Master PUD for an additional twenty-four (24) months. Although we have been unsuccessful in securing an anchor tenant at the time, there are a number of circumstances beyond OUT control that have drastically affected our efforts. The following is a summary for your review. Conditions of the Economv: We acquired our property in December, 2000. Since that time, we have endured a number of events that took our economy from the "pre-bubble" heights of the Dot.com/high tech stock days to a substantial economic recession. In quick succession, we experienced the crash of the stock market from the Dot.comJTech industry, 9/1 1/2001, Mghanistan war, Enron/World Com, etc., and the Iraq war. Many companies have struggled to survive, greatly reducing their space needs, much less need new space. 11100 WAYZATA BOULEVARD. SUITE 766. MINNETONKA, MINNESOTA 55505 TELEPHONE (952) 847.2444 . FAX (952) 595-8247 Mr. Aaron Parrish August 15, 2003 Page Two . Condition of the Real Estate Market: Office Space Market: 2000 - 2003 (I" half) Office Vacancies: (Total Market) Rose from 1l.9% to 21.70010 . Direct . Wilh Sublease OFFICE VACANCY 22 17 -..--"'-------.--.--.------- 20.5% 21.1% /~. '_~'" 1A 18.4% 7 11.~ . 10~ 1S'll1 8.4% -.---. 11)..D% .--.-- 7.2%~ / 12- 10.0% ~'% ..... ,~". 0- Z ... U ... > 0- Z '" U '" 'OS '" a... -3- 7,'" ~". 2 '02 "03 ....- ... ." ... ... '00 '0' . Office Space Absorption: (Total Market) Negative (2.150,000) square feet from the end of 2000 to 2003 OFFICE ABSORPTION 4,,--- 3 ~" 2 '" Z o ::; ... :>: 033 'V2 '03 ....- 0 ... ... ." ... ... '00 '0' 111 'UQ 121- 11..831 131 0- '" '" ... '" '" ... " <> '" OFFICE VACANCY AND ABSORPTION IFrRST HALF" 2DDJ. SUBMARI([T TOTAl"OF NO. VACANT SPACE PERCENT PERCENT VACANT SECOND HALF 2002 ,..2 FIRST HALF 2003 BUILDINGS. VACANT wI SUBLEASE ABSORPTION ABSORPTION ABSORPTION MiMeapotis CBD '02 26.1S3.8&ti 5,288.457 20,_ 23.7% 1385,806} 11,099,9911 l4.....n .........~ 03 6,207.366 838.824 13.50% "3ll% 2'1,<20 U22.0161 ....'" """"""" 13 1,519..464 288.594 19.00% 19.20% 182,.216J ISO.mI ~O.18O SouthIAirport " 4.896.482 189.157 16.10"4 18.60% 1~.351 135,831 30.958 . Sou,........ ". 13.601.685 2.J.lV.79 11.30% 20_ 19&,211) 1252,1521 ~2.5111 S1.PalltCBD 51 8,273.351 J.666..8ll6 20.10"4 11.20'4 1I:J5,S99l 1197.1511 112tU021 ..... " B;l8S.S02 1,504.282 11.90% 21.20%0 IH2,247) 1240.4701 '45.J99J TOTAl. MARKET 559 "JIZ1.7'ZO 'U2U>9 ,...... 21.10% ......... 11,826.2301 16$<,4731 . Mr. Aaron Parrish August 15, 2003 Page Three Industrial Space Market: 2000 - 2003 (I" half) Industrial Vacancies: (Total Market) Rose from 12.20/0 to 17.8% . Vacan<:y Rale . Vacancy Rate wi Subleaose INDUSTRIAL VACANCY I. " 14. '2 .... '0 Z '" . u '" > 0- . Z '" 4 u '" w .. 2 0 '95 17f11ll. ,.... U.T'" 12 ,,,. "''''' ,..... ."" ... '97 ... .,. '00 '01 '02 '03 1'1f.5f1tAL~ . Iudustrial Space Absorption: (Total Market) Negative (1,030,000) square feet from the end of 2000 to 2003 INDUSTRIAL ABSORPTION 5 <71 4 ---'153'.- - :rn '" z o ::; ... 3 .---------.----.-..---- w 2~_tRl. ~ 0- '" '" ... '" '" 0 ... ... " o '" ., '.. ." ... ... '00 INDUSTRIAL VACANCY AND ABSORPTION IFIRSt HALF 20031 SUBMARKET TOTAL " OF NR. VACANT SPAn: PERCENT PERCENT VACANT SECOND HALF 7002 ,.., FIRST HAlF 2003 BUILDINGS VACANT WI SUBlEASE ABSORPTION ABSOfWTION ABSQRPJlON .... BulkWarehous.e " 8.310.138 1.11.12.2'27 1'.00% 14.00% 28!i.'948 345..241 12l1-6501 '" ... Offke Showrrom .. 3.729.616 314,551 .- .."'" '11,n2 103.... 19l.7711 '" '" 0- DUiee Warehouse- '" 16.428.807 2.658.502 16.20%. .."'" '90.733 156.7631 039,11.51 . '" 0 z mAL 328 .........' 4,.145.280 1&.60% 15.80% ",.m ....... 1643._1 (Charts publicized by United Properties Market Study for 2003) Mr. Aaron Parrish August 15, 2003 Page Four . The extraordinary decline in our economy has brought the real estate market to a virtual standstill. The current vacancy levels have also resulted in reduced rental rates, increased tenant improvement allowances, and free rent. Status of A TS Steels: Please refer to the letter dated April 25, 2002, for the background on our discussion with ATS prior to our last City Council meeting in September, 2002. Since our last City Council meeting, we have been active in pursuing the acquisition of ATS even though the economy and the real estate market is in a major recession. The following is a summary of our activities. September, 2003 September 17, 2002 October 28, 2002 November 25, 2002 January 14, 2003 January 30, 2003 February 3, 2003 Just prior to the September, 2002, City Council meeting, we found out that the property had been listed with Welsh Companies and on the market for at least 30 days before we found out through another broker. No attempt had been made by ATS to contact us. Upon learning that Welsh was involved, we immediately contacted them for a meeting. We believed that ATS retaining Welsh was a positive step because they are one of the best firms in the Twin Cities with excellent experience and market knowledge. Based on our discussion with Welsh, we made an offer to ATS on September 17, 2002. This was rejected by ATS on October 28, 2002 in writing from Welsh. We subsequently revised our offer and resubmitted another offer on November 25, 2002. ATS rejected our offer but did not respond with any comments .or counter offer in writing. . On January 14,2003, we talked with Welsh to renew discussions regarding our offer. We communicated that we might be able to increase our offer by a small amount but it would depend on the other terms of the purchase. We ca!led Welsh to inquire about the status of our offer. ATS continued to reject our offer with no counter offers or direct communication. We contacted Welsh again regarding the status. Still no willingness on the part of ATS to even communicate with us. We made further contact with Welsh on the following dates: February 19, 2003 March 24, 2003 April 9, 2003 August 20, 2003 See attached letter . . Mr. Aaron Parrish August ) 5, 2003 Page Five ATS has refused to engage in any direct discussion, negotiation or meetings with us. At this point, we have expressed our frustration but informed Welsh that we are available at any time to discuss the potential acquisition of ATS. We have made numerous attempts to acquire ATS property since the Fall of 2000. They continue to insist on a price that is substantially above market, especially when you take into account substantial deferred capital expenditures required to return the property to a good condition, i,e. roof, parking, etc. The market values of all properties have clearly dropped over the past three years because of the economy and oversupply of excess real estate. However, we have increased our offer in spite of the current conditions. Other industrial brokers have confirmed that our offer is reasonable and in-line with the market. Therefore, we are at a loss as to why ATS has not agreed to a sale. ATS had objected to the extension of our PUD last year because they felt it affected their ability to sell the property. . First, the existing Gateway Business District (GBD) zoning outlines the area to be redeveloped including the ATS property. This Was put in place by the City in 1989. The GBD zoning changed the ATS property to a nonconforming use scheduled to be redeveloped in the future. Second, the Master PUD established by Chesapeake does not change the status of ATS's property under the current GBD zoning district. Our PUD defines the development standards, requires City final PUD approval, and is contingent on acquiring ATS. Our PUD simply defines in more detail the uses and development standards acceptable to the City for redeveloping the property. This is consistent with the GBD zoning that is already in place. Therefore, it is inaccurate for ATS to object to our PUD as something new that adversely affects ATS. The legal status of ATS would not change if our PUD was not in place. ATS would continue to be a non-conforming use. We are trying to implement development of the property consistent with the City requirements and the existing GBD zoning. Status of Interstate Crossin!!:: . In conclusion, the impact on the economy and the over supply of existing space has resulted in very few companies requiring new build-to-suit space. Most firms are contracting and leasing space in existing properties at rental rates far below the cost to build, Kodak Corporation is a recent example of what is happening in the market. They needed 150,000 square feet and contacted Chesapeake regarding Interstate Crossing, along with several other land sites, for a build-to-suit project. In the end, they used the build-to-suit options to negotiate a better deal to . renew in their existing space, This scenario is occurring because there is so much vacant space on the market at extremely low effective rates. . Mr, Aaron Parrish August 15, 2003 Page Six Our strategy is to continue to aggressively pursue quality companies when they come to the market, We hope that companies will start to come back in the near future to the build-to-suit market. When they do, we believe they will be hotly pursued by all viable landowners and City's. For this reason, it is important that we have as few barriers or obstacles as possible to secure a quality tenant. By baving our approvals/zoning in place, we eliminate a significant uncertainty in tbe analysis from the prospeetive company. In light of the current economy, most corporate executives are very risk adverse. They do not want to spend time or money pursuing a site that has any uncertainty or risk. Therefore, they frequently reject sites if they pose any risk of not closing. If you approve our PUD extension, it puts our site and efforts to secure a tenant at a strong advantage in a competitive marketplace. Some of the other landowners, developers, and City's do not have these advantages and will have to overcome the issues of uncertainty of City approvals, excessive time to achieve approvals, and additional expense that we have proactively . achieved. We invested a lot of time and money to make our site as marketable as possible to potential users, All of the essential issues have been completed such as wetland delineation, civil engineering, survey, topos, environmental, EA W, and Master PUD, We hope you continue to support our efforts to develop this property into a high quality campus that we can all be proud of. Extension of the PUD approval places Interstate Crossing in an ideal situation to capture business growth opportunities as soon as possible in a manner that advances the specific policies and goals stated in the City's comprehensive plan, Sincerely, CMK ARDEN HOLDINGS a Minnesota Limited Partnership Peter C. Carlson Chief Executive Officer PCC/amb . enclosure . .. . . . August 20, 2003 Mr. JeffMinea Welsh Companies 7807 Creekridge Circle Minneapolis, MN 55439-2609 RE: Interstate Crossing - Arden Hills, MN Dear Jeff: We are writing to offer a suggestion, We continue to have interest in acquiring the ATS building and we understand some of Peggy McKee's concerns to date. We believe it would be beneficial if we had an opportunity to meet with Peggy McKee to explain our interest in acquiring her property. We have accepted ATS's attorney's direction not to communicate at all with the McKee's (letter dated April 10, 2002 from Mr. Dan Beeson) and made all of our recent effort to communicate through you (ATS's broker). However, we still think that a personal meeting will give a better chance of working out a deal that is mutually agreeable, We expressed to you on a number of occasions our willingness to meet and hope that you would try again to facilitate a meeting with Ms, McKee. We hope to clarify and discuss several issues, You mentioned she was upset last year regarding the approval of the master PUD for the redevelopment of the area comprising our two properties. The PUD does not in any way change the current legal status of ATS's property. ATS is located in the Gateway Business DistTict which established the guidelines and policies for the redevelopment of all the properties within the District. The City of Arden Hills ("City.') established the District to redevelop the properties and that zoning change is what placed the ATS property into a "non-conforming" use. The City created the Gateway Business District in approximately 1989 and was in place long before CMK Arden Holdings even acquired the adjacent property (December 200 I), The zoning and legal status of A TS does not change whetheT the PUD is in place or not. The purpose of the PUD is for the City to establish the redevelopment guidelines/standards that the City would allow as acceptable building parameters for a new development. The PUD does not change the legal status of A TS under the Gateway Business District. 11100 w....yz:..r,., BOI L.l-X"RO. SUITt'. 766. M1NNETONK..... .\ll.':"-I':SO"I".-\ 55305- Tn.U'1I0:--:1'. (%2) &47-2444 . FAX (95:2~ S95.W!-l7 . Mr, JeffMinea August 20, 2003 Page Two Therefore, we believe it is inaccurate for Ms, McKee to think that CMK Arden Holdings has somehow changed the zoning or legal status of the ATS property, The Gateway Business District that governs the redevelopment of ATS's property was in place years before CMK. Arden Holdings acquired the property. Please contact them on our behalf to see if they would be interested in meeting, Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, CMK ARDEN HOLDINGS a Minnesota Limited Partnership ~.. 6/~~ Peter C. Carlson Chief Executive Officer . PCC/amb , pee 1 Qr'yV ClfWf: . . . . . . . . . ~ EN HILLS August 26, 2003 Ms. Peggy McKee 3002 North 82nd Street Scottsdale, Arizona 85251 Mr. Mark McKee 1901 13th Street NE Arden Hills, MN 55112 RE: City of Arden Hills Planning Case #01-05 Dear Mark and Peggy, Please be advised that CMK Arden Holdings, also referred to as Chesapeake Companies, is requesting an extension to their approved master plan planned unit development. Enclosed is a copy of the letter requesting the extension. For reference, this request will be considered by the Arden Hills City Council at theiT September 8, 2003 meeting. The meeting begins at 7:00 pm. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 651-634-5125. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, ~~ Aaron Parrish Director of Community Services CC: Michelle Wolfe, Arden Hills City Administrator Jerry Filla, Arden Hills City Attorney Peter Hellegef$, Arden Hills City Planner Dan Beason, Levander, Gillen, and Miller, P.A. Planning Case File #01-05 City of Anlen Hills . 1245 West Highway % . Arden Hills, MN . 55112-5794 Phone 651.634.5120 . Fax 651.634.5137 . www.d.anlen-hills.mn.ns . i . . e ~ ~HlLLS MEMORANDUM DATE: September 3, 2003 Agenda Item 6.B.i and 6.B.il TO: MayoT Beverly Aplikowski Council Member David Grant Council Member Brenda Holden Council Member Gregg Larson Council Member Lois Rem FROM: Aaron Parrish, Director of Community Services SUBJECT: Setting Preliminary Levy for 2004 and Truth in Taxation Hearing Dates ENCLOSURES: 1. Reso1utiou 03-57: A Resolution Setting the Preliminary Levy for Taxes Payable in 2004 2. Resolution 03-58: A Resolution Adopting Truth in Taxation Hearing Dates for Proposed Taxes Payable in 2004 Overview By September 15th cities are required to adopt and certify to the County their preliminary levy and truth in taxation dates for the upcoming fiscal year. Preliminary Levy As discussed at previous budget work sessions, the preliminary levy is proposed to increase by three percent for a total proposed 2004 levy of $2,333,337. This contemplates levying back the 60% oflost state aids allowable under legislatively mandated levy limits. Truth in Taxation Hearing In keeping with past practice, the truth in taxation hearing date has been set for the first Monday of December, or December 1st. Ifnecessary, a continuation hearing has been set for December 4th with the adoption hearing being set for December 9th. On the 9th, it is anticipated that the Council will consider adopting the final budget and levy for 2004. Reqnested Action 1. Consider approval of Resolution 03-57: A Resolution setting the preliminary levy for taxes payable in 2004 2. Consider approval of Resolution 03-58: A Resolution adopting truth in taxation hearing dates for proposed taxes payable in 2004 . . . ~ ~HILLS CITY OF ARDEN HILLS COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 03-57 A RESOLUTION SETTING THE PRELIMINARY LEVY FOR TAXES PAYABLE IN 2004 BE IT RESOL YED by the Arden Hills City Council that the following proposed sums of money be levied for levy year 2003, payable in 2004 upon taxable property in said City of Arden Hills for the following purposes: LEVY AMOUNT BEFORE HACA HACA CERTIFIED LEVY AMOUNT General Fund $2,333,337 $-0- $2,333,337 PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS THIS 8th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2003. ATTEST: MICHELLE A. WOLFE, CITY ADM TOR . . ~,"~J ~~ , , . . . . CERTIFICATION: STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) CITY OF ARDEN HILLS ) I hereby certify that Resolution No. 03-57 is a true and correct copy presented to and adopted by the City Council of the City of Arden Hills at a meeting thereof held in the City of Arden Hills, Ramsey County, Minnesota, on the 8th day of September, 2003. . CITY OF ARDEN HILLS COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 03-58 RESOLUTION ADOPTING TRUTH IN TAXATION PUBLIC HEARING DATES FOR PROPOSED TAXES PAYABLE IN 2004 BE IT RESOLVED by the Arden Hills City Council that the following Truth in Taxation Public Hearing dates, time and places for proposed property taxes payable in 2004 be certified to the Ramsey County Auditor and that notice of the Public Hearings be published in accordance with Minnesota Statute. Public Continuation Hearing Hearinl! UCNeeded) AdoDtion Hearinl! Date: December 1,2003 December 4, 2003 December 8, 2003 Time: 6:30 P.M, 6:30 P.M. 7:00 P.M. . Place: Council Chambers Council Chambers Council Chambers 1245 Highway 96 1245 Highway 96 1245 Highway 96 PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS THIS 8th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2003. tf:,~~L . Ii BEV~RLY APL S'- :'YoR:~" ATTEST: . . . . CERTIFICATION: STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) CITY OF ARDEN HILLS ) I hereby certify that Resolution No. 03-58 is a true and correct copy presented to and adopted by the City Council of the City of Arden Hills at a meeting thereof held in the City of Arden Hills, Ramsey County, Minnesota, on the 8th day of September, 2003. . . . ~ ~HILLS MEMORANDUM DATE: Agenda Item 6.C September 8, 2003 TO: Mayor and City Council Michelle Wolfe, City Administrator FROM: Peter Rellegers, City Planne@ SUBJECT: Case #03-03 City of Arden Hills County Road E-2 and Cleveland Avenue Rezoning and Comprehensive Plan Amendment Reouested Action Rezoning parcels (or the western half of parcels) generally located south of county Road E-2, west of New Brighton Road, east of Cleveland Avenue, and north of the Cottage Villas development, and also defined by the following Property Identification Numbers (PIN): 28-30-23-32-0009,28-30-23-32-0010, 28-30-23-32-0019, 28-30-23-32-0037, and 28-30-23-32-0014 from R-2: Single and Two Family Residential to NB: Neighborhood Business; also amending the Comprehensive Plan for parcels in the area such that the 500 feet of property adjacent to Cleveland Avenue, south of the drainage ditch and north of Cottage Villas, to be guided as Neighborhood Business and the areas east of the drainage ditch and the 500 feet of property adjacent to New Brighton Road be guided as Low Density Residential. Backl!round At their June 4, 2003 meeting the Planning Commission appToved a CompTehensive Plan Amendment for certain properties generally located south of County Road E-2, west of New Brighton Road, east of Cleveland Avenue and north of the Cottage Villas development, and also defined by the following Property Identification (PIN) numbers: 28-30-23-32-0031 28-30-23-32-0004 28-30-23-32-0030 28-30-23-32-0006 PC #03-03 - CC Report 0910812003 . Page I of 2 28-30-23-32-0007 28-30-23-32-0009 28-30-23-32-0014 28-30-23-32-0037 28-30-23-32-0008 28-30-23-32-0010 28-30-23-32-0019 . There are two reasons why the City is reviewing this issue. First, there are inconsistencies between the Zoning Map and Comprehensive Plan (Future Land Use) Map. Second, because the Future Land Use Map did not seem to follow property lines it resulted in some strange results. These results are small portions of property east of the drainage ditch being designated as Neighborhood Business when they have no access from Cleveland Avenue and the remainder ofthe property to the east of the drainage ditch is designated as Low Density Residential. Legal descriptions of the properties to be rezoned will be provided at the Council meeting. Plannin2 Commission Recommendation In Planning Case #03-03 the Planning Commission is recommending rezoning of the parcels (or the western half of parcels) generally located south of county Road E-2, west of New Brighton Road, east of Cleveland Avenue, and north of the Cottage Villas development, and also defined by the following Property Identification Numbers (PIN): . 28-30-23-32-0009,28-30-23-32-0010, 28-30-23-32-0019, 28-30-23-32-0037, and 28-30- 23-32-0014 from R-2: Single and Two Family Residential to NB: Neighborhood Business; also amending the Comprehensive Plan for parcels in the area such that the 500 feet of property adjacent to Cleveland Avenue, south of the drainage ditch and north of Cottage Villas, to be guided as Neighborhood Business and the areas east of the drainage ditch and the 500 feet of property adjacent to New Brighton Road be guided as Low Density Residential. Attachments 6C-l Applicable maps and charts 6C-2 June 4, 2003 Planning Commission Minute Excerpt 6C-3 June 4, 2003 Planning Commission Report 6C-4 May 7, 2003 Planning Commission Minute Excerpt 6C-5 May 7,2003 Planning Commission Report . PC 1103-03 - cc Report 0910812003 . Page 2 of 2 . . Council Attachment 6C -1 . -------------- . -------- --------- -- - ---- ------------ -~-- c: o 11- a.. ~CG o:E ...J III ~ ~ e 'l:I"g :: III .... (OJ e ~.$."ii1Q; - - > 'l"f .- G,I C ;::z: - (OJ fill t.J ::" III - _ ;JJ 1II'l:1 (OJ'l:I :: Cl. ("l.ii l'l E C'l_ ~ 0 = 0 LIJ U .- , c,;:;''l:I'l:I C ._ te c (OJ ("l C (OJ ;: D:: Ol ,a. .5 :: :: = C C N ("l~ q; >. ~ <J) 1ii LL ::J 0 a 0 >. 0 <J) ~ l:: ::J (j) - 0 ~ 0 z 0 0. 0 <0 l{) '2 <J) ~ 0 z 0 o C) l() , .. II ~~ W z CI') ~ >, <<> ~ ()) '" U. ::J 0 0 >, e 0 ()) 0 2: ~ ::J (f) - 0 ~ 0 z 0 0. '" 0 2 '" ()) ~ 0 Z I .-----" -----::::::...----- -~ -- ~ ------------ ----- --------------. e . GO .7i ... ill = = M " ,~ = '011 'ii"'- .., 1 - > C't n M :: C,II = = Co :l: - ,- l:l =t:I: CJ = ,_ - .. ill ~ 01... N eGO C';1 "! = -= .. e = u ex N ill .. ="- I:' 0 - CO_=-a. ,- "'..... . i ~. .. II: =-e .. u .. - Il:: .. Q., .a- u = = .. u z c o 11- a.. ~<<J o:t --' o ~ ifJ [S . . . ~ , ~ I I '\ \ '\ .- -- -, -- ~ ." ~~.t ~ ,,,,,, ..... I < I I I I I I I , , I , , ~ : ~ L...L " ~, < N~ .n -;: ...., .IVAi ,,,(' " '1~,~:it:,l,>~'; !"'" .. ~ ~ ~ 1= ~ · 1l~ ,~ , . ~ "'--3_ oI":'"J:m , ,f- . )~i'" ?~ / 1 ~ ~~~ I ,~ "": i ~: .&, "'i~ ~-i ... If ~ ~ " .....1 10 I : 0\ I : ':t; F, ~ : ~ '.' I , I , I ...' d... '" .st ~, ~ !' " i 1i , . , " l.lI r , \ ' , \ ' : '-~ \ I, i J11 I :i:~ 1 !:l! "~ 1 ' :: : " I :i I ----.l.-Cl---... --- --<--L_,-_ 'I I:, t, / I "~_I I I: , " I I ' I , I ", / ;' --i Ii'" --. i' , :t --1-- _. __ __ :, ' '" : '''' "', " '''' "", . /, , """': " , "', ,. , '" r.. : : , , f) !, ~ Ii i :-Q~t'j - Iiri., F b. r : : 'A', "'" <'or.: , r, , , '" '" I I I I , : "-"_ ,L~"'___ ""'1"'1 '''''",'1 """.",<<,.."""", "',,_, \" . I I I "__L____ _ , ~I I L_~l..._......__ I l,ftL_____ L 1. .. I ..... ..., .... I I I , I: "'~ - .... I I , I ...., . cs ...,. , ~ ~ ~ to:! " "'~ . ~ ~. ~ <(~ ~ --..---- ----- ----- -~-=-=-:.- -- >>,-e" -~ .... '" '" ~ , ...~ NOJ.11DRIfl M.l .... d' ..., , 1m .. .5"Ctlj I , , I I ~ , i l , I . , ~ I ; , , I , I , , ~ "'~ , . ~ . :. ~i It .HI -. -. , , II '" I r , , - ~ ~ <( >.. ~ ~ to:! ~ ~ . . . . ~ ~ ~ ~ . . II . , -1- ~: I I ~ I , I I I L. , : I';; : f l____ ..... J___L__ ." "'~I. I +-- .-'~; ,-=.,i,:..;:,'.';_ ~ 7'~~<~' I .. I ."....,~.~ ~ "-'; -,~ - ., :;~~~::~:- :'. , 'f) ':.\::~-- 1%1";" ~t~~ ~:.:;~;'~: ~- m ~,~(,.". "&;:~fi, .~..-. "',"'- ;..-~ . ~". n ~ u :l ." .I C ) , . .~'). ........ -.~ - }~ ~-?~~6~. ". -:~'-,'~i .;.: -~. ;., '~:.t..-...- ~. ~~i~~L-.. ~~;._-. "',:. . ~ .. H i ~ -.. ... .Lofo! ":!:!t)o.. t< '.., z~.!() %' t' ,~~S!:o - ., :-. o'!!): et) "" ~';~~::~~:'~:,l~t; ~ :e~'~ ,". '. ~~ . lIB ~.., . ~ tlt ..,gi Ill( 2 i)):':' o o .61 f.lr51 "5,1 ~ . . 0.1 : ...'!' .to CI>;i) '!'- 11): . . ~C\I ... v tKt )/ .. .. .. tJ ~ .. .. .. !a: , -'-- X X .' . ... . . ;(j~~j~>~~\ ~!_J, .--,..:.~. - ; - ,.~ ''':;~:};-~:-.;.~ ,.. -,~E-f~lf~;.' . -5:'-!f~;~l' <lVOCi ." ~" J06 ._ ': ~ .- .cot . .;'_~;~it~1~':~:: . . - ;~:f:'~,:(",~::>" ";l~~---~~j~~b:; . ,"'-.~-:."-;-;;-:::::- ;)I~i~~ ."; ~..- .i.!> ';" \ I .- . .0 \P r- CO C7) .- _.. ~J'~ .:.J:~' NOU6>J~g. s>ot ._ ..CU .. ., .. E! .,.- t '" * . '? .. ... tl :: __ t:_ .. -..- - ;:>- ..... S2I .001: ~f '''i- f f .. f. f ." .- .- '''3'''' .001 cl) eO <t;f- ~ ........ 5'\",' ~ ... '"' 2 N ~ .. '" ... oX a: N ~ ~ -~ ~ E.~ ... ! " ". €%-Qa. ~. , C~, . . (. I . . . Eo-lG, . g; 2 :l :e ~ --. '" ! !: -" en N + 1 ... .. ... J lij . n \ E"~6' . . - .Q, ,.- O.9~9Z .-- . WI j ~ . . Council Attachment 6C -2 . . . . ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - JUNE 4, 2003 3 Chair Sand stated whatever action they took tonight they were not making with any intent of impacting the lease issues or bankruptcy action. Commissioner Zimmerman asked if they owned title to this property. Mr. Tucci replied they had title to this property as sole owner. Commissioner Larson moved, seconded by Commissioner Ricke to recommend approval of Planning Case No. 03-14, KTJ Limited Partnership Seventy-Nine, 3673 Lexington Avenue North (Shannon Square), PUD Aroendment, subject to the eight conditions as listed in staff's June 4, 2003 report. The motion carried unanimously (7-0). B. PLANNING CASE 03-03: CITY OF ARDEN HILLS. COUNTY ROAD E-2 AND CLEVELAND AVENUE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT C. AND PLANNING CASE NO. 03-03: CITY OF ARDEN HILLS. COUNTY ROAD E-2 AND CLEVELAND AVENUE. REZONING/COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTIREZONING AND COMPREHNSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT Commissioner Modesette stated because she owned property in this area, she would be joining the audience and excused herself from the dais. Chair Sand opened the public hearing at 7:29 p.m. Mr. Hellegers stated at the May 7, 2003 meeting, the Planning Commission tabled the public hearing for consideration of a Comprehensive Plan Aroendment for certain properties generally located south of County Road E-2, west of New Brighton Road, east of Cleveland Avenue and north of the Cottage Villas development in the hope the Commission would hear more from the affected property owners at this meeting. Mr. Hellegers indicated the Commission had three options: . Rezoning; · Comprehensive Plan Aroendment; or · Combination of Rezoning and a Comprehensive Plan Aroendment. Chair Sand invited anyone fOT or against the Planning Case No. 03-03 to come forward and make comment. Chair Sand noted they had received an e-mail from the owner of Lot 9, Jim Spaniol, noting he was in favor of the area being a neighborhood business. Mr. Hellegers stated he had spoken with Katie Connolly, Lot 7, who indicated she wanted the area to be neighborhood business. He had also left a message for representatives of Cottage village, but had not received a Tesponse back. He indicated ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - JUNE 4, 2003 4 Lot No. 8 had been sold and the new owner indicated they liked the open space, but thought it might make more sense to have this neighborhood business, but they did want to maintain as much as possible of the open space. . Commissioner Zimmerman asked if staff had spoken with the Metropolitan Council for their opinion. Mr. Hellegers replied he had not spoken with them, but he did not believe this request would "raise any red flags" and they would not have any issues with changing this. Debra Thompson, 3747 New Brighton Road, Lot 11, stated she wanted the area to stay as it was. She noted there was a lot of wildlife in the area and they wanted the wildlife to stay. She noted they were 25-year resident of the City. Commissioner Ricke asked if there was development there, did it matter if it was neighborhood business or residential. Ms. Thompson stated it did not matter - she did not want to see anything changed. She did not want it rezoned. She noted they had many trees and was afraid they -.yould lose their privacy. She stated she did not see how anyone would be able to develop on the property because it was so wet in that area. Paul-, 3790 New Brighton Road, asked what kind of business would a neighborhood business entail and were there any plans to deal with the increased traffic on County Road E2 and Cleveland if businesses went in. Mr. Rellegers replied a neighborhood business was a lower intensity neighborhood business. It would serve the immediate area . and would be small Qffice use. He stated with respect to traffic concerns, a stoplight would need to be coordinated with the County, but he did not believe increased traffic would be an immediate concern. Commissioner Larson asked with the power line easement, could a building be built in that area, or would it be parking. Mr. Rellegers replied a building could not be built on a power line easement, but parking and landscaping could be in that area. Liz Modesette, 3743 New Brighton Road, Lot 10, stated if it would make the mechanics of a Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Plan as it was pretty much described the intent and the details of the specific use of the property may be best worked out. There were no further comments made for or against Planning Case No. 03-03. Chair Sand closed the public hearing at 7:53 p.m. Commissioner Ricke moved, seconded by Chair Sand to recommend to the City Council that both the rezoning and the Comprehensive Plan be changed consistent with the plan that was proposed on the slide presented by staff as Planning Case No. 03-03, City of Arden Rills, County Road E-2 and Cleveland Avenue, Rezoning and Comprehensive Plan Amendment showing an area to the north of the Comprehensive Plan that would have to be revised. The area to the Southwest of the zoning that would have to be . revised, and the triangular area that would have to be amended for both the rezoning and CompTehensive Plan. The motion carried (4-2) (Commissioners Larson and Zimmerman against). . . . ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - JUNE 4, 2003 5 Commissioner Modesette rejoined the Commission at the dais. UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS None. REPORTS A. Planning Commissioners Commissioner Zimmerman commented on the assessment policy for street repairs. He stated he believed the City should budget for street improvements and include that as part of the property taxes and set the pavement policy for the City on how streets would be repaired, maintained and reconstructed and then the City would not get into all of the contentious discussions that have occurred in the past. B. Staff None. C. Council Member Council Member Larson updated the Commission on recent City Council actions. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Ricke moved, seconded by Commissioner Larson to adjourn the meeting at 8:25 p.m. The motion carried nnanimously (7-0). . . Council Attachment 6C -3 . . . . . ~ ~LS MEMORANDUM DATE: PC Agenda Item 4. C June 4, 2003 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Peter Rellegers, City Planner SUBJECT: Case #03-03 City of Arden Hills County Road B-2 and Cleveland Avenue Rezoning I Comprehensive Plan Amendment I Rezoning and Comprehensive Plan Amendment At their May 7,2003 meeting the Planning Commission tabled the public hearing for consideration of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment for certain properties generally located south of County Road E-2, west of New Brighton Road, east of Cleveland Avenue and north of the Cottage Villas development, and also defined by the following Property Identification (PIN) numbers: 28-30-23-32-0031 28-30-23-32-0004 28-30-23-32-0007 28-30-23-32-0009 28-30-23-32~019 28-30-23-32~14 28-30-23-32,0030 28-30-23-32-0006 28-30-23-32-0008 28-30-23-32-0010 28-30-23-32-0037 Central to the issue is the reason for considering these actions. Briefly, the City's Comprehensive Plan Map (also called the Future Land Use Map) and the Zoning Map show inconsistent designations over portions of the properties outlined above. In order for the City to have consistent designations on both maps the City needs to either rezone certain property, amend the comprehensive plan for certain property, or rezone certain property and also amend the comprehensive plan for certain property. Following is a brief description of what actions the Planning Commission may consider at this meeting: PC #OHlJ - PC Report 0610412OO3 . Page I of3 , .' ,. REZONING . If the Planning Commission determined that rezomng was the appropriate measure to resolve the inconsistent designations, then those properties (or portions of those properties) listed above would be rezoned from R-2: Single and Two Family Residential to N-B: Neighborhood Business consistent with what is shown on the Comprehensive Plan (Future Land Use) Map. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT If a Comprehensive Plan Amendment was the Planning Commission's preferred measure, then the Comprehensive Plan would be amended (for the affected parcels) so that it would match the current Zoning Map. COMBINATION OF REZONING AND A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT The combination of the rezoning and Comprehensive Plan Amendment would rezone the western half (approximately 500 feet) of the five (5) properties south of the drainage ditch, and north of the Cottage villas development, to Neighborhood Business. This measure would also include a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to "square off' the Comprehensive Plan designation for these same properties. A Comprehensive Plan Amendment would also be necessary to . change the Comprehensive Plan designation of the six (6) small pieces of property east of the drainage ditch from Neighborhood Business to Low Density Residential. . The reason that the City is reviewing this issue is two-fold. First, there are inconsistencies between the Zoning Map and Comprehensive Plan (Future Land Use) Map. Second, because the Future Land Use Map did not seem to follow property lines it resulted in some strange results. Theses results are small portions of property east of the drainage ditch being designated as Neighborhood Business when they have no access from Cleveland Avenue and the remainder of the property to the east of the drainage ditch is desiguated as Low Density Residential. The Comprehensive Plan is established by the City to guide growth and development within the City. It is essentially the "vision" for the City. The Zoning Ordinance establishes desiguations which the City may use to help reach that vision. The reason that the City establishes specific zoning districts is best explained in Section SA of the Zoning Ordinance (District ProvisionslEstablishment of Districts): "The zoning districts designated herein are hereby established so as to assist the City in carrying out the intent and purpose of its Comprehensive Development Plan for the City and to control development in a manner consistent with the provisions of adequate public services and utilities. " Together the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance provide the City with a vision and a way to achieve that vision. . PC #03.()J - PC Report O6I0412ooJ . Page 2 00 " . Attachments 4C-l Applicable maps and charts 4C-2 May 7, 2003 Planning Commission Minute Excerpt . . PC 1103-03 - PC Report 0610412003 - Page 3 on .' .' . . Attachment 4C-l . . ~', .. " .. .. ~ . \1 ~ . ... . ~ EN HILLS , ~" R-1 crm:s - PLANT , ~ . . Zoning Map D 17'""'1...0,' ~ - - . - = II - - - - - D - Legend Zooing Districts R-',SIngleFamiy_ R-2: Single & Two F~ ResidenliaI DisbicI ....,T_&......"""""'__ R-4' __...... e...1: Uded Business DisIrict B-::it General 8u&ines8 Di&bict .8-3: SeMce Business 0istricI 8-4: RetIi Center DisIrict N-B; Neighbo,OOod BusIness G-B, Gateway........ l-1: UmiIed EndustriaI District I-2Gener:a1Industria1Dis1rict 1-N:J...FtEXDistrict cc: Civic Center District - _-Way w_ ~ n..z.:n...Di#rlcI~~ ~(lIl",".ftlI'.conq>OIIltIl>.(!Iy .,ArdiMHilhOf/it:iDl~MIp ~~.ZooIbl&'Hlp 1IIlJIIIJ"'."""Ii>iNOI]'..",.,Hi/k ~~ore~lI9~ p/moe""'''.a-;,g~fr........~ - --"- OIyof__ N + 2000 , 2000 Feet , o Map Data FeIlRJafy 21, 2003 . . Count)' Rd. 0 ~ ~~ HILLS Future Land Use Map Figure 3.2 Legend D ~ ~ - - - - ,. .- - - - D - Future Land Use LOR: Low Density Residential MDR: Medium Density Residential HDR: High Density Residential MR: Mixed Residential NB: Neighborhood Business COM: Commercial M8: Mixed Business IND: Industrial PI/: Public & Institutional Park Park Preserve Right-aI-Way Water [)i;cJm.nu. n.C~l'C1'b.~iofuf'<- J1'VVlftJd""..w""'l'~",the.Oty ofMdetlHHbPulkyfOrl.-JlheMiPotJpwl' ~C<>Il<VIIilrgJkUmd{htrMap 1iAooJdbedira:MdIOtlte.QI)'ofAMDtHiIk fgl/JU"'~'"'SJ.Jbj<<tIJ}~ ~r'<(a-l<Ifk~...I'/tvIfr i;(JtOlJ'/t,tl.imdlhe~ N + - ......- CiryofAtdeolfil1o 2000 , o 2000 Feet , Map Oate- March 31. 2003 :>. (j) ~ a; Q) :J LL 0 0 :>. 0 Q) 0 2: . ~ :J fJ) - 0 ~ 0 Z 0 <Il 0 2: t[) Q) ~ 0 Z . ~. -- ----------- . 1;) c: o ..-. . ... > ... <t .::: ... '" M .. .. " c:; ~ ... , '" .c '" > '" ... co ::: :i!i ... .. '"' ... '" '" .. (.) 5 5 '" ~ ... <> ... " ,. .. I.l .. U a " ... '" ,<> .. .. .. '" .:t .: ., , ... w ~ i:'v - .. " .!l .!l .- " .. U Q g" g" CI:: : ~ .. <> .. N = .. Q CI:: (.) o o o t[) ~ z {/) ::s: ----'""""-~ --=--- ~ ~----- ----~. -------.~-- . ::J ,._ o ~~ r~ "'-." ""-...'. ""--........... ..... ~, I,..........~,,~'--....,.~ \~-, ',~c<_~_ ~~-~~c'-~_, . ''''I>t;'''I''';'-::~' _"~'=",,!,_, _~ '~c...... ~""IO ,_ __'___~_, ~~~-~~~-~-=::~:::.::::::;:.:::::::--.~---~-~ -~-------... ~ ---.............._~ e e e , " i:'.INNNNNNN-.;tNN OO-~'I"'""""""''''''''''''r"C\I ,..............'I"'"".....'I"'"".......-('I').....t-- m........................"''''''''.... ~lt)IOll)lDll)U)lOl()1D1{) zzzzzzzzzz:;: :;:::;:::;:::;:::;:::;:::;:::;:::;:::;:> z z w w12w12 w ::t jJ:::II:t::l - -Cl-Cla.-<( .......J:...J:ji::J:ji::WJ:1- .:;J~Z~ZmZmll)ZI!.1 _w_w . w OW~ .a.Oa.O'?;O'?;-'OCl j-o-l!:l-l!:wl!:WI-l!:::l O)<(U)<(Z<(ZW<(<( o T-.O<o:t<O..... 00 0) 0 CD..... 'V (1)(11')00000......,...('1)..... 00000080000 .0.00000 0000 NNNNNNNNC\lC\lN (f)(")(II')(\')(")('t)('I)MM.M("') .~(W)M(,,)(,)M(W)(w)C")MM NNNNNNNNNNN 000000000000 (1)(II')(W)(II')('f')MC")M('O')('t)M <OCOO)l>>O:>COCOOO(QOOCO C\lNC\lNNNNNNNN ; ." " . . Attachment 4C-2 . .' . . . . ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - MAY 7, 2003 4 Commissioner Zimmerman asked what was Phase 4 of this development. Mr. Kerns replied that would be the retreat center. Mr. Hellegets stated Phase 3 was proposed for 2004 and Phase 4 for 2012. Commissioner Zimmerman noted this request was fairly consistent with the original PUD submitted. Commissioner Larson slated he wanted to see the entrance off of Highway 96 signalized. He asked if they needed approval by the Watershed District. Mr. Hellegers replied they would need that approval. Commissioner Zimmerman requested when they present their PUD they have elevation drawings and color renditions of the site. Comrnissioner Ricke asked once this phase was completed, would the Easter and Christmas event be expanded. Mr. Kerns replied because of the larger capacity, they did not believe they would need to go beyond the number of events they were holding, but it was difficult to predict the future. Randy Bolduc, Ellerbe Beckett, summarized the elevations of the proposed development. eomlnissioner Zimmerman requested they prepare specific numbers for the elevations when they present the PUD. Chair Sand requested they add a southwest elevation also. Mr. Bolduc replied the final submittal would have all of the elevations. Chair Sand asked if the materials would be the same as the main building. Mr. Bolduc replied it would. Chair Sand asked how much higher was the new proposed spite. Mr. Bolduc replied it was five feet higher. Chair Sand requested they determine how much exterior light would reflect off of the building, the hours of lighting, and the type of lighting when they presented their final plan. There were no further comments made for or against the Concept Planned Unit Development. Chair Sand closed the public hearing at 7:58 p.m. B. PLANNING CASE 03-03: COUNTY ROAD E-2 AND CLEVELAND AVENUE COMPREIlENSIVEPLAN AMENDMENT Chair Sand opened the public hearing at 7:59 p.m. Commissioner Modesette stated because she owned property in this area, she would be joining the audience and excused herself from the dais. . ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - MAY 7, 2003 5 Mr. Hellegers stated at their April 2, 2003 meeting, the Planning Commission . recommended that a public hearing be held to consider a Comprehensive Plan Amendment for certain properties generally located south of County Road E-2, west of New Brighton Road, east of Cleveland Avenue and north of the Cottage Villas development. CommissioneT Smithknecht asked how would this affect the current residents. Mr. Hellegers replied the residents would not be able to change their property along Cleveland Avenue to neighborhood residential; it would have to remain a residential area. He noted statT's recom:mendation at the Commission's last meeting was to rezone and prepare a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and now they were recommending the Comprehensive Plan Map be amended to reflect the Zoning Map. Chair Sand stated he believed they had discussed the Comprehensive Plan 1Iiight have been drawn in error for the area at their last meeting. Commissioner Zimmennan expressed concern that they did not have any definite boundaries right now. Chair Sand invited anyone for or against this Comprehensive Plan Amendment to make comment. Katie Conley, owner of Lot 7, stated their property was currently listed for sale and they . were interested in selling part of it along Cleveland Avenue as neighborhood business because it Was not suited for a residential home. She noted it was a perfect place for a commercial development because a developer could afford to fill in the soil, but it was not suitable for residential development. She indicated the site was too close to Cleveland Avenue and the freeway and no one would want to build a residential home on the site. She stated it would make sense to continue the neighborhood business along Cleveland Avenue because the northern part of it was already neighborhood business. Commissioner Zimmerman asked if the swale was neighborhood business or residential. Mr. Hellegers replied it was neither neighborhood business nor residential. Ms. Conley stated at the February Council Meeting it was recommended the easement would be lifted, which would make their property more developable. Chair Sand stated it would be up to the Connty if they wanted to lift the easement and he did not believe the County would be willing to do that. Commissioner Larson stated he did not believe it was the Commission's job to replat property, which is what they would be doing if they followed staff's original recommendation. Commissioner Larson stated he believed neighborhood business was probably the appropriate zoning for this area, but it was not the Commission's job to replat the . property and that should be left up to a developer. PeteT Mollowski, 388 Cleveland Avenue, stated they were a potential developer for this . atea and they were currently in discussion with the property owners for a possible office . . . .' ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - MAY 7, 2003 6 condominiwn on this site. He noted they had done extensive research on the soil and it would need a lot of soil correction in excess of $500,000 to get lhe lots buildable. He stated he did not believe single-family residential would be able to afford to build on these lots once they took the soil correction cost into consideration. He stated the reality was that this site was suited for higher density residential, such as a townhome, apartment building, or a commercial development. Commissioner Zimmerman stated it was not the Commission's place to decide what residents should do with their property, and it was up to the residents to come before the Commission as a group to request rezoning. He stated he was against telling people what they had to do with their property. Commissioner Ricke stated she believed this area should be neighborhood bnsiness. Commissioner Larson stated he would look favorably to this area as being neighborhood bUsiness, and if the residents wanted this neighborhood business, it was up to the residents to request it and it was up to the developer to draw the property lines. Mr. Mallowski asked if the City was open to a zoning change. The Commission noted they were not opposed to it. Liz Modessette, 3742 New Brighton Road, stated she would prefer that the zoning be changed to reflect the Comprehensive Plan. She stated she believed that lhe Comprehensive Plan was a deliberate plan when it was set forth. She said this would send a message as to what the City's vision was for those properties orice they were developed. She noted there was a potential here that they would end up with single- family next to neighborhood business and if the zoning was changed to neighborhood business, it was less likely that this would happen. She stated she believed Lot 3 should be zoned residential. She noted Lots 4, 5, and 6 currently matched the zoning and Comprehensive Plan and Lots 9, 10, and 11 were already separated and replatted and the zoning there was already set. She stated only Lots 7 and 8 needed to be determined. She stated she owned Lot 10. Chair Sand stated if they followed the Comprehensive Plan, it would divide lots 9, 10, and II even further and create a middle portion. He asked what would they zone lhe middle portion. Commissioner Zimmerman reiterated it should be up to a developer to come forward with a proposal for the area and where things should be divided and it was not up to the Commission to set property lines. Commissioner Ricke stated she believed lhe City needed to set their vision for this area. Ms. Conley noted the middle section of the proposed Lot 9, was a wetland area and they would want that area to remain as wetland. Chair Sand stated he did not believe the Commission should establish property boundaries. Mr. Parrish indicated it was not uncommon for properties to have two legal descriptions. ~ ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - MAY 7, 2003 7 Mr. Hellegers suggested this be tabled to the next meeting to attempt to communicate . with the other property owners as to their thoughts about their property. Ms. Connolly stated there as a building moratorium in place until next February, so they were not in any need to get this decision right away. Commissiouer Ricke requested the notice summarize both alternatives the Commission was considering. Mr. Hellegers replied they could do that and reminded the Commission with the building moratorium they could put this action off for 60 days or mote if they needed more time.. There were no further comments made for or against the Site Plan Review. Commissioner Larson moved, seconded by Commissioner Zinimerman to table Planning Case 03-03 and continue the Public Hearing to the June Planning Commission meeting. The motion carried nnanimously (5-0). UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS None. REPORTS A. Planning CommiSSioners . None. B. Staff Mr. Hellegers noted last Saturday was the first Planning Commission bus tour and asked for any suggestions for future tours. Chair Sand requested they also look at commercial, civic center properties in the future. C. Council Member Council Member Larson updated the Commission on recent City Conncil actious. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Ricke moved, seconded by Commissioner Zinimerman to adjourn the meeting at 9:07 p.m. The motion Carried unanimously (5-0). . . . Council Attachment 6C -4 . . . . ARDEN RILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - MAY 7, 2003 4 Commissioner Zimmerman asked what was Phase 4 of this development. Mr. Kerns replied that would be the retreat center. Mr. Rellegers stated Phase 3 was proposed for 2004 and Phase 4 for 2012. Commissioner Zimmerman noted this request was fairly consistent with the original PUD submitted. Commissioner Larson stated he wanted to see the entrance off of Righway 96 sigualized. He asked if they needed approval by the Watershed District. Mr. Rellegers replied they would need that approval. CommissioneT Zimmerman requested when they present their PUD they have elevation drawings and color renditions of the site. Commissioner Ricke asked once this phase was completed, would the Easter and Christmas event be expanded. Mr. Kerns replied because of the larger capacity, they did not believe they would need to go beyond the number of events they were holding, but it was difficult to predict the future. Randy Bolduc, Ellerbe Beckett, summarized the elevations of the proposed development. Commissioner Zimmerman requested they prepare specific numbers for the elevations when they present the PUD. Chair Sand requested they add a southwest elevation also. Mr. Bolduc replied the final submittal would have all of the elevations. Chair Sand asked if the materials would be the same as the main building. Mr. Bolduc replied it would. Chair Sand asked how much higher was the new proposed spire. Mr. Bolduc replied it was five feet higher. Chair Sand requested they determine how much exterior light would reflect off of the building, the hours of lighting, and the type of lighting when they presented their final plan. There were no further comments made for or against the Concept Planned Unit Development. Chair Sand closed the public hearing at 7:58 p.m. B. PLANNING CASE 03-03: COUNTY ROAD E-2 AND CLEVELAND AVENUE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT Chair Sand opened the public hearing at 7:59 p.m. CommissioneT Modesette stated because she owned pToperty in this area, she would be joining the audience and excused herself from the dais. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - MAY 7, 2003 5 Mr. Hellegers stated at their April 2, 2003 meeting, the Planning Commission . recommended that a public hearing be held to consider a Comprehensive Plan Amendment for certain properties generally located south of County Road E-2, west of New Brighton Road, east of Cleveland Avenue and north of the Cottage Villas development. Commissioner Smithknecht asked how would this affect the current Tesidents. Mr. Hellegers replied the residents would not be able to change their property along Cleveland Avenue to neighborhood residential; it would have to remain a residential area. He noted staff's recommendation at the Commission's last meeting was to rezone and prepare a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and now they were recommending the Comprehensive Plan Map be amended to reflect the Zoning Map. Chair Sand stated he believed they had discussed the Comprehensive Plan might have been drawn in error for the area at their last meeting. Commissioner Zimmerman expressed concern that they did not have any definite boundaries right now. Chair Sand invited anyone for or agaiust this Comprehensive Plan Amendment to make comment. Katie Conley, owner of Lot 7, stated their property was currently listed for sale and they were interested in selling part of it along Cleveland Avenue as neighborhood business because it was not suited for a residential home. She noted it was a perfect place for a commercial development because a developer could afford to fill in the soil, but it was not suitable for residential development. She indicated the site was too close to Cleveland Avenue and the freeway and no one would want to build a residential home on the site. She stated it would make sense to continue the neighborhood business along Cleveland Avenue because the northern part of it was already neighborhood business. . Commissioner Zimmerman asked if the swale was neighborhood business or residential. Mr. Hellegers replied it was neither neighborhood business nor residential. Ms. Conley stated at the February Council Meeting it was recommended the easement would be lifted, which would make their property more developable. Chair Sand stated it would be up to the County if they wanted to lift the easement and he did not believe the County would be willing to do that. Commissioner Larson stated he did not believe it was the Commission's job to replat property, which is what they would be doing if they followed staff's original recommendation. Commissioner Larson stated he believed neighborhood business was probably the . appropriate zoning for this area, but it was not the Commission's job to replat the property and that should be left up to a developer. Peter Murlowski, 388 Cleveland Avenue, stated they were a potential developer for this area and they were currently in discussion with the property owners for a possible office . . . . ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - MAY 7, 2003 6 condominium on this site. He noted they had done extensive research on the soil and it would need a lot of soil correction in excess of $500,000 to get the lots buildable. He stated he did not believe single-family residential would be able to afford to build on these lots once they took the soil correction cost into consideration. He stated the reality was that this site was suited for higher density residential, such as a townhome, apartment building, or a commercial development. Commissioner Zimmerman stated it was not the Commission's place to decide what residents should do with their property, and it was up to the residents to come before the Commission as a group to request rezoning. He stated he was against telling people what they had to do with their property. Commissioner Ricke stated she believed this area should be neighborhood business. Commissioner Larson stated he would look favorably to this area as being neighborhood business, and if the residents wanted this neighborhood business, it was up to the residents to request it and it was up to the developer to draw the property lines. Mr. Murlowski asked if the City was open to a zoning change. The Commission noted they were not opposed to it. Liz Modessette, 3742 New Brighton Road, stated she would prefer that the zoning be changed to reflect the Comprehensive Plan. She stated she believed that the Comprehensive Plan was a deliberate plan when it was set forth. She said this would send a message as to what the City's vision was for those properties once they were developed. She noted there was a potential here that they would end up with single- family next to neighborhood business and if the zoning was changed to neighborhood business, it was less likely that this would happen. She stated she believed Lot 3 should be zoned residential. She noted Lots 4, 5, and 6 currently matched the zoning and Comprehensive Plan and Lots 9, 10, and 11 were already separated and replatted and the zoning there was already set. She stated only Lots 7 and 8 needed to be determined. She stated she owned Lot 10. Chair Sand stated if they followed the Comprehensive Plan, it would divide lots 9, 10, and 11 even further and create a middle portion. He asked what would they zone the middle portion. Commissioner Zimmerman reiterated it should be up to a developer to come forward with a proposal for the area and where things should be divided and it was not up to the Commission to set property lines. Commissioner Ricke stated she believed the City needed to set their vision for this area. Ms. Conley noted the middle section of the proposed Lot 9, was a wetland area and they would want that area to remain as wetland. Chair Sand stated he did not believe the Commission should establish property boundaries. Mr. Parrish indicated it was not uncommon for properties to have two legal descriptions. . ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - MAY 7, 2003 7 Mr. Hellegers suggested this be tabled to the next meeting to attempt to communicate . with the other property owners as to their thoughts about their property. Ms. Conley stated there as a building moratorium in place until next February, so they were not in any need to get this decision right away. Commissioner Ricke requested the notice summarize both alternatives the Commission was considering. Mr. Hellegers replied they could do that and reminded the Commission with the building moratorium they could put this action off for 60 days or more if they needed more time. There were no further comments made for or against the Site Plan Review. Commissioner Larson moved, seconded by Commissioner Zimmerman to table Planning Case 03-03 and continue the Public Hearing to the June Planning Commission meeting. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS None. REPORTS A. Planning Commissioners . None. B. Staff Mr. Hellegers noted last Saturday was the first Planning Commission bus tour and asked for any suggestions for future tours. Chair Sand requested they also look at commercial, civic center properties in the future. C. Council Member Council Member Larson updated the Commission on recent City Council actions. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Ricke moved, seconded by Commissioner Zimmerman to adjourn the meeting at 9:07 p.m. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). . . . Council Attachment 6C -5 . . . . . ~HlLLS MEMORANDUM DATE: PC Agenda Item 4.B May I, 2003 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Peter Hellegers, City Planner SUBJECT: Case #03-03 ' City of Arden Hills County Road E-2 and Cleveland Avenue Comprehensive Plan Amendment At their April 2, 2003 meeting the Planning Commission recommended that a public hearing be held to consider a Comprehensive Plan Amendment for certain properties generally located south of County Road E-2, west of New Brighton Road, east of Cleveland Avenue and north ofthe Cottage Villas development, and also defined by the following Property Identification (PIN) numbers: 28-30-23-32-0031 28-30-23-32-0004 28-30-23-32-0007 28-30-23-32-0009 28-30-23-32-0019 28-30-23-32-0014 28-30-23-32-0030 28-30-23-32-0006 28-30-23-32-0008 28-30-23-32-0010 28-30-23-32-0037 These parcels or portions of these parcels are currently zoned R-2: Single and Two Family Residential but are listed on the City's Future Land Use Plan as NB: Neighborhood Business. The Planning Commission is following a 2-step method for review of this matter. The May 7'h meeting is Step 2 ofthe 2-step process outlined below: Step I) At the AoriI 2nd meeting the Planning Commission determined that the parcels should remain zoned R-2: Single and Two Family Residential and has recommended changes on the Comprehensive Plan (Future Land Use) to reflect the Zoning Map. PC 1103-03 - PC Report 05/0112003 - Page 1 of2 r " ') Step 2) Overview Mav 7. 2003 Public Hearing to consider an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan which would change the Comprehensive Plan Map to mirror the Zoning Map (in this specific area), The public hearing is an opportunity for the residents and property owneTS in this area to voice their opinions on the proposed amendment. The recommendation of the Planning Commission would be passed onto the City Council and would be considered at the City Council's May 27, 2003 meeting. . The affected aTea is composed of II parcels, of which many are through lots which run from New Brighton Road to Cleveland A venue. There is a right-of-way which transverses the parcels and runs east from Cleveland Avenue, then turns north until COUilty Road B-2. It appears that this right-of-way is for a drainage ditch which may have served to drain some of the low wet land in the moratorium area, part of the drainage from Interstate 35W, and additionally some drainage from New Brighton. Ramsey County is the property owner for the right-of-way area and has determined that the drainage right-of-way is still necessary. Most of the property owners of the parcels that are affected by the moratorium have homes and their appurtenances along New Brighton Road and the Cleveland Avenue side of the properties remains undeveloped. The following table summarizes the properties around affected properties (please also reference the attached Zoning and FutuTe Land Use maps). ,~~ ~ ''''--~'~ "- ~ ,""( v- ;:;::" ,,,-~t: i . ,~ r ,:) ,,,",' ",<, . . _ _",_.~=~__ ~~~ .~~ _ _ CA~~ ~_ _ ~ _ ~ _ _~ ~-. North South East West . Neighborhood Business / Park NB: Neighborhood Business District / R- t: Singte Family Resideutial District R-2: Single and Two FiuIUly Residential District R-2: Singte and Two Family Residential District N.A.-(Rightcn~Way) Multiple Family Residential Single Family Detached Residential N.A. - (Rightcnf-Way) Vacant / Open Space Low Density Residential Low Density Residential Cleveland Avenue /1-35W Recommendation In Planning Case #03-OJ, the Planning Commission has recommended that the Comprehensive Plan Map (Future Land Use) be amended to reflect the Zoning Map and that a public hearing be held. Attachments 4B -I 4B -2 4B - 3 March 28, 2003 Planning Commission Report FebruaTY 28, 2003 Planning Commission Update April 2. 2003 Planning Commission Minute Excerpt . PC 1103-03 - PC Report 0510112003 - Page 2 of 2 { " . r . . Attachment 48 -1 . ,~ , . . ~ ~~HILLS MEMORANDUM DATE: March 28, 2003 PC Agenda [tern 5.A TO: Planning Commission FROM: Peter Rellegers, City Planner SUBJECT: Case #O3'()3 County Road B-2 and Cleveland Avenue Moratorium Area At their February 10, 2003 meeting the City Council approved a moratorium on certain parcels in the Vicinity of County Road B-2 and Cleveland A venue. These paTcels are currently zoned R-2: . Single al'l.dTwo Family Residential but are listed on the City's Future Land Use Plan as . NeighbadtOOd Business-. The current situation could result in development which is inconsistent with.theCity's COlilprehensive Plan (Future Land Use). As a result of the moratorium the Planning Commission will review the affected area to determine whether the pToperties in the moratorium area should be zoned NB: NeighboThood Business or R-2: Single and Two Family Residential. The Planning Commission will also consider whether the COlnpTehensive Plan needs to be amended to incorporate any Tecommended changes. Staffhas established the following 2-step method fOT the Planning Commission to review this that will cover two Planning Commission meetings. Step I) At the April 2nd meeting the Planning Commission will determine whether the moratorium area parcels should be zoned NB: Neighborhood Business or R-2: Single and Two Family Residential. If the Planning Commission detennines that the current zoning should Temain, the Planning Commission will then determine what changes on the CompTehensive Plan (FutuTe Land Use) would be necessary. Following the April 2nd meeting, staff will send the Tequired notices for the public hearing. Step 2) A Public Hearing will be held at May 7'h meeting for whicheveT action the Planning Commission recommends (Rezoning and/or Comp Plan Amendment). . PC 10)3-03 . PC Report 032803 . Page I or J , .' . Overview . The Moratorium Area is composed of II parcels, of which many are through lots which run from New Brighton Road to Cleveland Avenue. There is a right-of-way which transverses the parcels and runs east from Cleveland Avenue, then turns north until County Road E-2. It appears that this right-of-way is for a drainage ditch which may have served to drain some of the low wet land in the moratorium area or it may have ,been drainage for part of Interstate 35W. Currently staff is working with Ramsey County and the City Attorney's office to determine the owner of the right-of-way area and whether 'the drainage right-of-way is still necessary. Most of the property owners of the parcels that are affected by the moratorium have homes and their appurtenances along New Brighton Road and the Cleveland Avenue side of the properties remains undeveloped. The following table summarizes the properties around the moratorium area parcels (please also reference the attached Zoning and Future Land Use maps). . ~___-~' '~~~I..~~i-: '~~' ~2 -'-~~-~-~~ ~ ~_- ~~ ____:-_n_ ___~__=_-____~__-~ <__~_~_~ _~~_____~_ _ _ ~ ~"_~ . Neighbodrood Business I NB: Ne;gJroQi.-bQod Business North I. Uistriet/R-t:SingleFamily Vacant I Open Space Park Residential District South Low Density Residential I. R-Z: sin&lelUtliTwo Family Mnltiple Family Residential i!.f$identiel District East U>w Density Residential R"Z: Singlean,d Two Family Single Family Detaebed ~id~~IDi$ict , ResideJllial .. N"(::;'OOilht-o'f-Way) N.A. ,;,'(Right...f-Way) West Cleveland Avenue I I-35W . . i. Options 1. Recommend approval as submitted. 2. Recommend approval with conditions. 3. Recommend denial. If the City denies the petitioner's request, <<... it must state in writing the reasons for the denial at the time that it denies the request". 4. Table for additional infomiation. Recommendation In Planning CaSe #03-03, staff recommends that the Comprehensive Plan Map (Future Land Use) and the Zoning Map be amended to reflect the attached map (Attachment 5A -I). PC Jj()J-(13 - PC Report 032803 . Page 2 of 3 . , ,~ . . . . Attachments 5A-I 5A-2 5A-3 Map of Staff Recommended Changes Council Memo 02/1 0/03 Council Minute Excerpt 02110/03 PC #03-03 - PC Report 032803 - Page J of 3 . .:- .. . . Attachment SA - 1 . .' . anu~-1L . \7 PUe.,. a-1~/O c o Q. ~'" 0::2 a..I. C\ C ~ E c _ III ;;) e '= III Q c.~ E~ Ill... t.l C C Q) ~ E .- Q. ~ Q ... - o III ::> 5 III 'e: Q ~<( z ~ ~ < " C t1) ..(1) ~ .,:: U 't:l C ~ {\oj , 6i.I b C ::l o I..l ~ (]) cD LL C) C) C) ~ C) C) C) If} w :s cD C. :J " U) - o ~ o Z (U. ~ cD ~ o Z lI) . . . . Attachment 5A - 2 . ,,' ~ 'N HILLS . MEMORANDUM DATE: February 6, 2003 Agenda Item 6.A.l TO: Mayor and City Council Joe Lynch, City Administrator FROM: Peter Hellegers, City Planner SUBJECT: Developme:nt mol'l!torium for parcels designated on the Future Land Use Map as Neighborhood Business and designated on the Zoning Map as Single and Two-Family Residential ep- Requeste.dActum Consider adoption of Ordinance #343, and establish the parameters of Teview for the Planning Co~ission regarding this matter. Baek2ro",Qa Recent inquiries from interested developers have brought to light conflicting desiguations on the Future Land Use and ZOliing maps in the: vicinity of Cleveland Avenue and County Road B-2. The Zoning Map shows the parcel at the comer of County Road E-2 and Cleveland Avenue and the two and a half parcels directly south of the parcel (until the County ExceptionlRight-of-Way) are zoned for Neighborhood Business. The area south of the County Exception is designated as R-2: Single and Two Family Residential on the Zoning Map. However, the Future Land Use Map shows four and abalfparcels diTectly south of the County Exception which are currently. designated as NeighbQdi,ood Business (in addition to the parcels currently zoned Neighborhood Business). In August of 1995 the Minnesota Legislature made amendments to the Metropolitan Land Planning Act, which state that: "If the comprehensive munu:ipal plan is in conflict with the . PC #03-03 - Council Memo 021003 - Page I of 4 . . zoning ordinance. the zoning ordilUlllce will be brought into confomwnce with the plan by the local government in conjunction with its review imdupdate of its comprehensive plan required . by December 31. /998." Subsequent to the City Council approval of the Comprehensive Plan on November 8, 1998, the Zoning Ordinance was amended to create the Neighbodwod Btminess District by Ordinance 315 (adopted on September 27, 1999). It appears that most of the areas designated in the Comprehensive Plan as Neighborhood Business were re-zoned to coordinate with the Comprehensive Plan designation. The area presently being discussed appears to have been overlooked as part of that effort. Staff Comment There have been several inquiries from developers interested in constructing either residential homes or neighborhood business buildings in this area. It is staff's belief that were a moratorium not enacted, that the described property could be developed in a matuler inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan before the City had a chance to review and amend either the Zoning Map or the Future Land Use Map (Comprehensive Plan Map). A moratoriuin would provide the necessary time for the Future Land Use Map and Zoning Map to be reexamined by the Planning Commission and COuD.cil, and the necessary changes made to i.nSuR; that development WOl11d be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. One offuedangers of not taking any action to amend either the Zoning Map Qf!:b,e f\lWre Land .., Use Map is that the conflicting map desiguations could permit development which does not confonn to the City's Comprehensive Plan and could have undesirable results... Hypothetically, a single-family residence could be located in an area currently zoned as R-2'(SiligleandTWo Family Residential) but desiguated on the Future Land Use Map as Neighborhood Business All that would currently be required is a building permit from the City Building Official. Subsequently, a developer could submit an application for rezoning of a neighboring property from Single and Two Family Residential to Neighborhood Business (based on the fact that the re-zoning would be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan the City would have very limited grounds for denying such a rezoning request). The neighboring properties could be re- zoned and developed in such a fashion and the result would be that the landowner who constructed the single-family residence could then be the only residential use (or residentially zoned parcel) in between two areas of Neighborhood Business. " Neil!hborhood Notice and Impact All affected property owners were sent a detailed letter with attachments stating that the Conncil would be reviewing this item at the Febmiu-y 10'" Council meeting. The Council, Planning Commission and certain staff were sent copies of this letter by e"maiL Efforts have been made to mitigate the impact of the moratorium on the affected property owners by allowing the east 300 feet of properties (where possible) to be excluded from the moratorium. PC #03-03 ~ Council Memo 021003 ~ Page 20f 4 . ,0 . ..::e exception would allow the Tesidents of the area to remodel or restore residential buildings .::::d experience minimal, if any, disruption. The more substantial impact would be that for the duration of the moratorium property that is currently undeveloped would have to remain undeveloped until which time as the moratorium expires or is terminated by Council action. All efforts will be made to expedite this process; to resolve the conflicting Comprehensive Plan and Zoning designations, and to have the mOTatorium terminated as soon as possible. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council adopt an ordinance that would place a moratorium on the development of those parcels which show a conflicting status on the Zoning Map and Future Land Use Plan (as defined by the proposed draft moratorium) for a period of twelve (12) months unless terminated or extended by the City Council. Prior to enacting a development moratorium, staff would recommend defining possible parameters of review for the Planning CommissiolL Staff would suggest the following: e I. The Planning Commission shall evaluate whether the described parcels should be zoned as either Neighborhood Business or Single and Two Family Residential. After evaluating the described parcels for the correct Zoning designation, the Plaruiing Commission should make the necessary recommendations to proceed in resolving the conflicting Comprehensive Plan and Zoning designations. lL Should the Planning Commission determine that the described parcels should be zoned as Neighborhood Business; the Planning Commission shall review and recommend a rezoning of the property to Teflect the appropriate Zoning designation. b. Alternatively, should the Planning Commission determine that the described parcels should remain zoned under the current designation and that the Comprehensive Plan should instead be amended; the Planning Commission shall review and recommend that the Comprehensive Plan be amended to reflect the appropriate Comprehensive Plan desiguation. SU22ested City Council Action I, ConsideT adoption of Ordinance #343, An Ordinance Implementing a Development Moratorium on Certain Property within the City of Arden Hills, (property as defined by the draft moratorium). 2. By motion establish the parameters of review for the Planning Commission in regard to . the described parcels and the conflicting CompTehensive Plan and Zoning designations . PC 1103-03 - Council Memo 021003 - Page 3 of 4 . Attadl_ts 6Al - a. -~ .,. ..-fiAt ~ 6Al - d. 6Al - e. 6Al - f. List of Properties Included in Moratorium Area. Drull-.6rRK9fi.am QlL-..__ i!J'1'3=-- Dl n ]L.fnr:"~. ~umm:aPJ.' Location Map ZonilU!: Map Future Land Use Map - j PC 1103-03 - Council Memo 021003 - Page 4 of 4 e .. e . . . . . r--,....oo.........,..'oIit~"I:t'"t"t- 1Oll>..Cf)(\')T"""T'"".T'""T'""O......(o IOIONNNNf\!N.....(\I('l) ~....(\')M(I')(")(")('")a(")o t\l.~NNNNNC'I(I)NN 00....._..-..-..........0....('.1 T'"""r'""T"""T'""......-r-.........M_t- 0000001010101010<010.... Q')Cf)Q)t()UlUlU)U')lt)Ult() z z 00 (J). (J) I- (J) I- (J) ::I ::f X::: 3: ::l - -(!I-C>O-<( 5 -' x -' J: ir. J: ir ::l J: I- :<~ffi~zmffimgm~ lLa..oa..03:05:oog til-~ti~~~~lii~<( "T-"O......<o.....oomOOJot--.::t \'1').("')0000.0 T'"" T'""('f)...... '0'0000.000000 000000 0000 NNNNNNNNNNN ('r)(")('t)<?MM-(')Cf)(f)("') (I)('t)('t)('l')<<)-('O')(\')('l)(W)("')('l') NNNC\lNNNNC'\t('\(N 000000000000 ("')~("')('f)('Q('l)('t)<")(O)(\')(") iCl)O)Q)O)O)WO:>Q)OJCX)OJ NNNNNNNNNC'lN '. . ~ ill ill U. C) C) ill C) 2: ~ :::J (f) - 0 ~ 0 z C) '" C) 2: l[) ill ~ 0 z ~-1 .. VPu&~ . tlfo 01 C ; == c - ~ ,E e .. III 0 -lG c... e 0 -::E Ill., \J C C III ~ = ._ Co 'l:l 0 .. - Q Ql ::- e ~ ':: = lll<( C qj ~ 'l:l C III "ai :> ! () 'l:l C III N . LU Z. C ::l Cl ~ C) C) C) l[) c ~ 0 Q., Il- ea Z 00 :t ~ . ..J ,~ . "'\.. _-to ~ ," l -( ~ ~ G' ,t ~ A ~, ~ ~ , '. . .... R-1 <TI1IlS AIlM>' PUNT , \ . .e ~ ~~HILLS Zoning Map CJ CJ - - - - - . . - 1m - . - - CJ - Legend Zoning Disbicts R.1:SiogIeFamlyResidential R-2: Single & Two Famiy ResM:lentiaI 0i$tIict R-3: Towmouse & Low Density WtipIe Dwelling R-4:MultipIe~OisIrict B-1: Umlted Business District B-2: Gener.If Busine$s Oi$trict B-3: SeMce Busine$$ 0istriCl 84: Retail CenterOistrid. N..a: Neighborhood Business 6-<10 GaIeway"""'" 1-1: Umiled Industrial District 1-2: GenetaI tndustrial Oistric:t ...,..,: t-FlEX 0istricI CC: CMr; Center- DistficI RaIroad Right-of-Way w_ ~. n.,ZtrnirlfDinricl~~. ~......m""'P~",""'Dl)o' qA....HilbOf/id<1lz-u.sUtlp. ~~.2l:WnrMIlp dorJJMdi<uled./1ftOly",A'-HilI$ ZtJMtg~-~"'~ phose..qe,-",flteZoooi'!KQodi"""<'t"{o<'COfIIP1oIe~ - .....,.- Cior<>f..-lfilk N + 2000 , o 2000 Feet , Map oate: FebNary 21. 2003 '. ".. ~ ~~HILLS FUTURE LAND USE D D - . II - - - - - D - ~ Legend Future land Use lOR: low Density Residential MOR: MedIum Density ~ia1 HDR: High Den..ly Residential MR: Mixed Residential NB: Neighborhood Business COM: C<>mme<ciaI MB: Mixed Business IND: Industrial P\I: Public & InstiMional Park Pafk PresefVe Right-of.Way Water n.~",('U.~~ ~_"",_~...lival)' ......Hlhf'plqfi>rt.-JUI4~__ ~~.....r.-tu..JtDp "ldk~"''''''C-",,'''A''''Hi1h_ '-4Vw~....~",~~ ~......IfK~""~fr .....-l.JMdlJu~ - -- OIrol~_ N + 2000 , o 2000 Feel , UapOate; Oeoembef 20. 2001 . . ,,,-. . . e Attachment SA - 3 . d ... ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES .February 10,2003 4 assessment hearing date was set as a milestone date and was not a critical date. The date could be pushed back to accommodate dialogue regarding the design, if approved by the City Council. Mayor Aplikowski requested staff contact the members of the Association Task Force and the other residents who have an interest in the project with the information once it became available. 5. PUBLIC IlEARlNGS None. 6. COMMUNITY SERVICES A. PLANNING . 1. Development Moratorium: CoUiJ.tyRoad' E2 & Cleveland Avenue Mr. Hellegers stated recent inquiries from interested developers had brought to light conflicting designations on the Future Land Use and Zoning maps in the vicinity of Cleveland Avenue and County Road E2. He requested the Council consider the adoption of Ordinance No. 343 and establish the parameters of review for the Planning Commission regarding this matter. Liz Modesette.. 3743 New Bri2hton Road, stated as a resident of this neighborhood, she had followed this issue for many years. She stated she did not believe the residents had been notified of the future land uses. She stated she agreed With the future land use map and how it was laid out, given the history of the lots. She asked what the time frame was to complete the process of making this area consistent, and if this could be expedited to be completed within one year. Mr. Hellegers replied they hoped to get this done as soon as possible, possibly within three months if everything went as planned. Katie Conlev. 3777 New Bri2hton Road, stated her concern was that the location . map was not the same as the Land Use or Zoning map. She asked if the City would consider subdividing the lots, therefore, her neighbor could not tear down his house and build a neighborhood business. Me. Hellegers replied the City did not intend to have the Neighborhood Business District zone in her area. u.. . ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES February 10, 2003 5 . MOTION: Councilmember Larson moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a motion adopting Ordinance No. 343: placing a moratorium on the development of those parcels which show a conflicting status on the Zoning Map and Future Land Use Plan for a period of twelve (12) months, unless terminated or extended by the City Council and to establish the parameters of review for the Planning Commission in regard to Cleveland Avenue and County Road E2. Councilmember Grant requested the Planning Commission look at this immediately. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). MOTION: Councilmember Grant moved and Councilmember Rem seconded a motion to pass the Ordinance summary to reflect . Ordinance No. 343. The motion carried unanimously (5:..0). Mayor Aplikowski. requested. timely and complete infonnation be given to the residents in the, area. She also requested the right-of-way issues be researched prior to the Planning Co1ll111ission' s review. B. TCAAPUPDATE Mr. Parrish stated the regularly scheduled Development Team meeting focused on the need to bring key stakeholders to the table for discussion. . In addition, the need for a three-dimensional model that outlines existing conditions for the site wasdiscussed. He noted the next meeting was scheduled for February 18, 2003. Mr., Parrish stated the Advisory Panel met on February 4, 2003. He indicated the presentation focused on the linkage between demographics and housing. The next meeting is scheduled for March II, 2003, at City Hall. Mr. Parrish noted a letter h~ been sent requesting a joint meeting of the Arden . Hills City Council and Ramsey County Board. . .of'I' . . Attachment 4B-2 . -.ILl- . . . . ~ ~HlLLS MEMORANDUM DATE: PC Agenda Item 5.B February 28, 2003 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Peter Hellegers, City Planner SUBJECT: County E-2 and Cleveland Avenue MOTatorium Update At their February 10, 2003 meeting the City Council appToved a moratorium on certain parcels in the vicinity of County Road E-2 and Cleveland Avenue. The moratorium would effectively baIt development on the parcels north of Cottage Villas and south of the Tr-ammproperty located alon.g Cleveland Avenue and along the easemen.t area that cuts through the area. As a result of the moratorium the Planning Commission will review the affected area at the April Planning Commission meeting. Staff requested that the Council provide the Planning Commission with specific direction on how to proceed. Approved direction from Council is as follows: 1. The Planning Commission shall evaluate whetheT the described parcels should be zoned as either Neighborhood Business or Single and Two Family Residen.tial. After evaluating the described parcels for the correct Zoning designation, the Planning Commission should make the necessary recommendations to proceed in resOlving the conflicting Comprehensive Plan and Zoning desiguations. a. Should the Planning Commission determine that the described parcels should be zoned as Neighborhood Business; the Planning Commission shall review and recommend a rezoning of the property to reflect the appropriate Zoning designation. b. Alternatively, should the Planning Commission determine that the described parcels should remain zoned under the current desiguation and that the Comprehensive Plan should instead be amended; the Planning Commission shall review and Tecommend that the Comprehensive Plan be amended to reflect the appropriate CompTehensive Plan desiguation. Depending on the actions taken at the April meeting of the Planning Commission, it may prove necessary to hold additional public hearings for eitheT a rezoning of the affected properties or a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. , v. . In addition, the Conncil stated that the easement issue should be investigated and hopefully resolved through this process. Staffhas contacted Ramsey County to establish the ownership and purpose of the easement area. At this date staff has not received all the necessary information on the easement area, however the information should be available for review at the April Planning Commission meeting. . If you have any questions or comments please feel free to contact me. . . , .. at. . . Attachment 4B -3 . . . -' . . . . ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - APRIL 2, 2003 8 Commissioner Modesette stated her property had a telephone pole right in the middle of it. Mr. Gode noted every lot on Glen Arden Road was 80 feet by 200 feet and the poles were spaced 80 feet apart. Chair Sand noted Ms. Richards was concerned that they did not have 80 feet on their property. There were no further coIIllIlents made for or against the Site Plan Review. Chair Sand closed the public hearing at 8:51 p.m. Commissioner Larson asked staff if a building permit application were approved and issued, would the property line have to be established and located in order to get it in the right location. Mr. Parrish responded it all depended on the circwnstances. He noted if the resident found the stake and could measure it, they would not require a survey. He stated if there was a question about the property line, the building inspector could verifY the line or they could Tequire a survey. Commissioner Larson asked what was the front setback. Mr. Hellegers replied the front setback was 40 feet. Commissioner Larson asked if they had room to the front fOT this garage. Mr. Hellegers replied they probably could hot put anything much further forward than proposed. Commissioner Larson moved, seconded by Commissioner Ricke to deny Planning Case #03-09, Bruce Gode, 3538 Glen Arden Road, Variance for the following reason: · The state Statute definition of "undue hardship" is not met. In Chapter 462.357, Subdivision 6, (2), defines "undue hardship" as a situation where: "...the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls...". However, in this particulat instance the official controls would allow the applicant a reasonable use; construct a two-car garage somewhere behind the house OT continue to have an attached one-car garage. Also, as stated in staff's report, the property could be put to a reasonable use without the granting of a variance and therefore, does not demonstrate that there is an undue hardship. The motion carried unanimously (6-0). UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS A. COUNTY E-2 AND CLEVELAND AVENUE MORATORIUM. Mr. Hellegers stated the City COUilcil approved a moratorium on certain parcels in the vicinity of County Road E-2 and Cleveland Avenue on February 10, 2003. These parcels were currently zoned R-2. The current situation could result in development, which is inconsistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. As a result of the mOTatorium, the Planning Commission needed to review the affected area to determine whether the . -"" to ~ - . ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - APRIL 2, 2003 9 properties in the moratorium area should be zoned NB and whether the Comprehensive . Plan needs to be amended to incorporate any recommended changes. Chair Sand asked if the parcel west of the drainage ditch was zoned NeighboThood I3usiness. Mr. Hellegers repli~ that was correct. Chair Sand noted if they went the rezoning route, the lots would be least affected. Mr. Hellegers replied there would be some impact on all ofthe lots, but in terms of keeping it consistent, statfwas recommending the residential area be R-2 and the remaining area be NB, which would make it more consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Commissioner Modesette asked if the size of the lot on the west side of the drainage area would be sufficient for development. Mr. Hellegers replied staff was attempting to keep this consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Commissioner Modesette suggested coming off the north side of the island and straightened that line up to the lots that were not in the moratorium. Mr. Hellegers replied that was a possibility. Commissioner Zinunertnan asked what was the ownership status on the lots divided by the drainage easement a,nd those lots south of the drainage easement. Mr. HelIegers replied that certain lots on the west and south sides of the drainage easement had not subdivided to become separate lots, these lots Were still considered part of the lots fronting on New Brighton ROM. . . Commissioner Zinunennan stated even if they did indicate that the lots were NB, the owners would need to subdivide their lot and sell it to a developer. Commissioner Modesette noted there would be five residents that would need to subdivide their property. Commissioner Zinunennan noted this area might never be a neighboThood business district because the residents might not sell their property. Mr. Parrish noted if they rezoned to be consistei1t with the Comprehensive Plan and added the small lots on east side of the ditch, they were not creating developable lots. Commissioner Zimmerman asked if by adding portions of the lots to the south of drainage ditch, was it necessary to have that portion of the property designed NB in order to make that whole piece of property developable,. or could it be developed as it currently existed on the zoning map. Mr. Parrish replied it depended on what they wanted to see there in the future - either a neighborhood businesses or a residential area. Chair Sand stated if developers thought that the only suitable land available for development was north of the ditch, why were they talking about rezoning the area to the south. He asked why did they not deal only with the "island" and leave the area to the ' south asR-2. Mr. Hellegers noted the reason the Planning Commission was reviewing . this issue was that if the area south of the drainage ditch remained zoned as R-2 it would not be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Commissioner Ricke asked why this area was designated the way it was on the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Parrish stated the type of interest they saw on those lots was . ... ........l- . . . . ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - APRIL 2, 2003 10 from Bethel College and mini-storage facilities. He noted given the location of the property and some of development constraints, it would need to be commercial or higher density residential. Commissioner Zimmerman stated the way the property was laid out in the Zoning Map was sufficient and did not need to be changed. He noted if a developer wanted to change the zoning, it would be up to them to come in for a rezoning request. He believed the Future Land Use map should be changed to match the Zoning Map. Mr. Hellegers noted there was also large electric transmission lines lllong Cleveland Avenue and any development would need to be outside the easement area, approximately 100 feet back from the street. He lllso noted staff had received requests from varioUs developers for bnsinesses, as well as interest in constructing a single-family home. Comnlissioner Ricke suggested leaving it up to the public hearing and the residents to direct the Commission. ' Commissioner Zimmerman noted if there was not a need to change it at this time, why change it. Mr. Parrish noted the purpose of the Future Land Use Plan was for the future planning and the City needed to determine what they wanted to see there in 20 years and not rely solely on resident input to make that decision. . Commissioner Ricke pointed out that the City did not know the reason the Comprehensive Plan was laid out the way it Was. Commissioner Zimmennan noted he did not see the reason they needed to rezone this, there appeared to be no need to do so and he did not want to split up residentilll property. Commissioner Larson noted he supported the staff's recommendation because of its proximity to the freeway. He stated he would like to see the area rezoned and this was a good area for a neighborhood business. CommissioneT Modesette stated she agreed with Commissioner Larsou and expressed concern about creating an island between residentilll and neighborhood business. She pointed out the three southern lots were already separated lots from the residential side. Commissioner Bezdicek asked which lot had recently been separated. Mr. Hellegers Teplied it was the second lot from the south. Commissioner Ricke asked if it would be difficult to show the R-2 coming off of the Southwest comer as suggested by CommissioneT Modesette. Mr. Hellegers noted that area would need to rezoned to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. ChaiT Sand noted they would need to pTepare a survey to go along with the topography. Commissioner Zimmerman moved, seconded by Commissioner Larson to recomIllend that the Commission supports the current Zoning as it exists and change the Comprehensive Plan Map (Future Land Use) to match the Zoning Map. ,. ~ -; ...., .. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - APRIL 2, 2003 11 Commissioner Bezdicek noted this area was more conducive to neighborhood business rather than residential development. Chair Sand reminded Conunissioner Modesette that she would need to abstain from voting due to her owning property in this area. The motion carried (3-2-1). (Chair Sand, Commissioners Zimmerman and Larson - Aye. Commissioners Ricke and Bezdicek - Nay. Commissioner Modesette - abstain). REPORTS A. Planning Commissioners None. B. Staff None. C. Council Member Council Member Larson updated the Commission on Tecent City Council actions. AOOO:u:RNM.EN'l' Commissioner Ricke moved, seconded by Commissioner Zimmerman to adjourn the meeting at 9:45 p.m. The motion carried unanimously (6-0). . e . . ~ ~HILLS MEMORANDUM DATE: September 3, 2003 Agenda Item 7.A. FROM: Mayor Beverly Aplikowski Conncil Member David Grant Council Member Brenda Holden Council Member Gregg Larson Council Member Lois Rem Aaron Parrish, Director of Community Services III TO: SUBJECT: Cummings Park Shelter Design ENCLOSURES: 1. September 3, 2003 Letter from Kraus-Anderson to Guidant 2. HCM Original Design 3. RSP Currently Approved Design . Overview Recently, the Council approved the desigu of the Cummings Park Shelter. As Council will recall, as part of the development agreement between Guidant and the City, Guidant is required to construct a shelter in an amount not to exceed $350,000. After finalizing the cost estimates for the shelter as currently designed, the cost is currently estimated at $450,000. Enclosed is a letter from Kraus-Anderson to Guidant providing a breakout of the costs. In a meeting with Kraus-Anderson and Guidant, they indicated that they received bids from other contractors as well all yielding approximately the same cost. There are generally two options to address the cost differential. These options include: 1. Allocating approximately $100,000 from the Park Fund to cover the difference 2. Go back to the original park shelter design prepared by HCM thereby reducing the project budget to $350,000. From staffs perspective, the second option is preferable. While there are only minor changes in the facility as currently approved and the original desigu, the Council will note the following: . )> The currently approved building plan calls for an L shaped building while the original plan called for a rectangular building. In our discussions with RSP, we indicated that we wanted a building like the one currently in Tony Schmitt Park. We intended that to primarily pertain primarily to building materials. They took the currently approved design one step further by replicating the layout of the Tony Schmitt building. )> The currently approved building plan has a roof over the entire picnic area while the original plan only partially covers the picnic area. The remainder of the picnic area is an open air courtyard enclosed by a half wall. Memo to Mayor and Council September 3, 2003 Page 2 of2 Aside from the two changes above, the building materials and components will remain the same. In short, the exterior will look like the structures at Tony Schmitt Park with the exception of the accent colors. In this instance, the accent colors will be Arden Hills green as opposed to red. ReQuested Action 1. Staff recommends approval of the proposed desigu change. . . . . . . .. ~ Kraus-Anderson~ UJl SPECIAL PROJECTS September 3, 2003 Mr. Dave Reimer Guidant Corporation 4100 Hamline Ave N Arden Hills, MN 55112 via fax 651-582-3226 RE: Cummings Park Shelter Arden Hills, MN Dear Dave: In accordance with your request, our cost estimate for the construction of the Cummings Park Shelter as indicated in RSP's drawings dated 8/14/03, is as follows: Earthwork · Building excavation and backfill for the frost footings, grading for the building slab-on-grade, sand cushion, and fine grading. Site Utilities . Sewer, water services and fire hydrant run from the Wyncrest Court to the Park Shelter. Bituminous Paving · We include Wycrest Court patching, existing pathway patching, a new pathway at the park shelter and a new pathway that extends to Femwood. Concrete Curb and Gutter . We include patching concrete curb and gutter at the Wyncrest Court turn aronnd, due to removal for utilities. Landscaping and Sod . We include transplanting two (2) trees and sodding the affected areas due to the construction. $20,000.00 $28,100.00 $19,595.00 $4,100.00 $4,875.00 79 Apollo Drive, Lino Lakes, MN 55014 . 763.792.3677 . Fax: 763.792.3678 . www.krausanderson.com 6... ):;'....."1 r\...~~.......:...T ~~...I~....r Mr. Dave ReimeT Guidant Corporation RE: Cummings Park Shelter 2 Concrete and Masonry . We have included frost depth footings with an 8" CMU foundation wall. The exterior masonry will match the existing park shelter at Lake Johanna Tony Schmidt Park. The concrete slab-on-gTade to be a 4" plain concrete floor. We have included a concrete pathway on the west side of the shelter that will connect into the bituminous pathway. We have also included a concrete pathway and staircase that will tie in the north side of the shelter to the bituminous pathway. Structural Steel · We have included bearing plates, beams, and lintels for structural support. Steel Erection . Erect, fasten and weld the structural beams. Lumber Material . We have included supplying the rough framing lumber, trusses, sheathing, cedar, batt Insulation and miscellaneous materials necessary to complete the shelter. Carpentry . Carpentry consists of wood trusses, roof sheathing, doors, hardware, exterior soffits, cedar soffits and fascia. EIFS . We have included the EIFS band and column wraps. Shingle Roofing . Included a 25-year "Timberline" type roof shingle over asphalt felt with ridge shingles and roof vents as required. Caulking and Sealants . Caulking and sealants have been figured at all hollow metal door frames, concrete slab expansion joints, EIFS, plumbing fixtures and all penetrations as required. Hollow Metal Doors, Frames and Hardware · All doors indicated are to be hollow metal doomarnes, hollow metal doors and fmish hardware. Glass and Glazing . We have included the glass that sits in the hollow metal doors. 9/3/2003 . $142,000.00 $3,798.00 $2,500.00 $22,347.00 . $42,900.00 $4,798.00 $7,831.00 $3,690.00 $22,448.00 $1,790.00 . . . . ., Mr. Dave Reimer Guidant Corporation RE: Cummings Park Shelter 3 Epoxy Flooring . We have included epoxy flooring in the pTep kitchen, bathrooms and janitor's room. Painting . We have included painting all interior masonry, hollow metal frames and doors, finish the soffits, fascia and seal the exterior black. Fire Extinguishers and Toilet Accessories . We have included two (2) fire extinguishers, for the shelter grab bars and basic toilet accessories to go into each bathroom. Stainless Steel Counters · We have included a stainless steel sewing counter and a stainless sink/counter in the prep area. Counter Curtain Roll-up . We have included a standard 8'-0" x 5'-0" aluminum roll-up curtain. Plumbing · We have included all necessary water, waste and vent piping with one mop sink, two frost prost hydrants, three water closets, one urinal, four lavatories and three floor drains. HVAC . We have included two (2) 50,000 BTUH electrical furnaces, exposed spiral duct for distribution, and exhaust for the restrooms and janitor's closet. Electrical . The scope of electrical work is as follows: . Trench a new underground 100 amp feeder. . Purchase and install one (1) new 100 amp 3 phase service. . Lighting in bathrooms, warming house, storage, food prep, janitor's room, and exterior lighting. . Outlets in restrooms (GF1), kitchen and six (6) general-purpose outlets. . Purchase and install two (2) electric hand dryers. . Purchase and install two (2) new electric heaters. . Power to mechanical units. 9/3/2003 $5,491.00 $7,655.00 $2,741.00 $5,200.00 $2,075.00 $13,900.00 $12,800.00 $16,900.00 Mr. Dave Reimer Guidant Corporation RE: Cummings Park Shelter 4 9/3/2003 . General Conditions . Part-time supervisIOn, general cleanup, dumpsters, temporary toilet, survey and layout, trucking and equipment, and testing services. $31,530.00 Contractor's Fee . Our contractor's overhead and profit is figured at 5% of the total construction. $21.445.00 $450,509.00 PROJECT TOTAL: ALTERNATES 1. Delete 2' of the roof's overhang. 2. Change the half high block to 8" full high block. 3. Eliminate the concrete path at the west side of the shelter. 4. Eliminate the concrete path and stairs at the north side of the shelter. 5. Delete the half high wall in between the column on the east side of the patio. 6. Eliminate the bituminous pathway that leads out to Femwood Avenue. 7. Eliminate the epoxy flooring. 8. Delete the aluminum roll-up curtain in the kitchen prep area. 9. Delete fire hydrant. 10. Deduct present budget from original design. I 1. Asphalt patching is currently priced without milling the entire cul-de-sac, it would be an add to mill the entire cul-de-sac. Please feel free to contact me upon your review. Very truly yours, Kraus-Anderso11@ SPECIAL PROJECTS Matthew (Matt) Johnson Project Manager MJllt Deduct: $14,000.00 Deduct: $15,000.00 Deduct: $1,500.00 Deduct: $2,500.00 Deduct: $5,000.00 Deduct: $3,275.00 . Deduct: $5,491.00 Deduct: $2,075.00 Deduct: $2,600.00 Deduct: $99,992.00 Add: $9,975.00 . ~ . . -r;r(j ~ .,0; \~ ~D\ ~ \\)-1-. "\ \ _ \}\ f "'0::\1 lt~ ~ ~! \. . }~. o ft ? ~ ~ f r.f 11 . rz,. \.) L. L-I ~ >> - ~t - - o l (j ~IJ Comm. No. ~ ~k Arden Hills Park Facilities Masterplan Till. Cummings Park c2 Building Site Plan . lit THIRD A~ENUf No..$UlrE U' . MINHfllrOUI.~" tUG1 0266 001. 9/18/02 . . I .' f\ :I: (') s:: o ..... cO' :S' ~ o CD Ul cO' ~ HAGENj CHRISTENSEN & MoIL\ nl.ltllln4.1Ul.r,l,X!lIl1I04.11U ARCHITliCT8 ~IJ Comm. No. 0266 Dale 9/18/02 1; 1 ...... ~ 1 ~ ~ r \- . . " . I . I t I I I ,,--- --- "," --- .... \ ~ C \ i l i\ ~ ~~ \ Project Arden Hills Park Facilities Masterplan mi. Cummings Park Building Floor Plan t~~ j ~ } ~. fbUk- -r I ! . , . . ~~& ., f 1 ::t: o :s:: o ~ .0' 5' e1.. o CIl rJ'J .0' ::l ~~ 4-J \' ~, ~ . 0~ }jz -.. ...., --; - Orowlng N.. c3 f\ HAGEN, CHRISTENSEN & MolLW ARCl-lITIliCT8 111 THIRflAVfNUIHo..lIUlTe no .MINNEAPOLn MlIlUOl TE UIN.nl.' 11l1IU.ltt1 . Comm. Ho. 0266 o.t. 9/18/02 . " ~ 1\ ~ C ~~ , \\ ~ , / , , , If / \ 1 / , / \ / . ...... \) .. -...r- .' . " ....I Project Oroolog No. Arden Hills Park Facilities Masterplan TIll. Cummings Park c4 Building Elevations / Image f\ , . , ::r: () s:: o ., lB' :i' !!1.. o CD (J> lB' ::I HAGEN. CHRISTENSEN <. MCILW "AOHITIiCTS 11 THUllI AVE/USE Mo..tUITE uo. MIIlHE"~OU Mil tsHl 'TEL IIU'II4.nn. Fu '.1I1104.JUI -- - - - - - - -- - -fj-- I i i r;; ~ N () :r 0 5' - >< 5' "" ib' :l () C'D )> o o ~ en ::; m ." S; Z L .., ". - \ ~\ \ \ ~O \ t \ ~ '"0 5' <1> -_ ':"-I -_ll> :r-__ :;) --- <ii' 0- g \Q 0- o o a. ---- \ I I I I I I I I I I I I I '" '"0 5' <1> to o '" "" <1> ..... 0- ~ - o o \ \ \ \ \ \ \ O'l \ . \ :h \ ~ \ 0\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ " o <il '" - >< o o N I I I I I I I I I i i ~ ---_/ ~~ Iii i .. Iii ~ :r:. o o 7' (\) '-< \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I I I I I / / / / / / / ,- ..... ..- --- / / / / / / / \ \ \ ) / / /'" N~ . CXl . ?J -. ::) 7' ig 2 () <1> ~- . ig 2 (') <1> I -- --- --- - - - - - - - -998- - - -- ------- ;0 (JJ lJ () c: ... Cil ~ .... -< > -c -c a < CD c- o CD CI> <0' ~ ---- --- -- - . I , r I . I HI I , ~i II ~ f'- lii I'i rh 'I) H 'Ii fl. ,I .1 II I. f I -In ~ '( Ii !I I ~ > :0 '" m Z :l: ~ ." ~ '" en :l: ~ $ Ifill II ill I , ,'I 1111 f t:l ~ g !l J "ll ~ Ii; ., !:! 11!'j ~ it f tlUI i ~ I.II! lilt' ILl J r If , ~~ ~>l ~ )> ~ o ~ L ~ ~ i on 6 o '" ." > Z ~ ~ ; ~ . I I I I I I I I I I I I I : I I I ~ I I ~ I I t ~ ~ ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I ~ I ; I I ~ I I 1'4' ~... 1'\'"---- I' I " I ~ , I ,: I I , ~ o i \ I I "'--f>- i (~ I " .....,,...r.---':i" 1.,,1 III : I~, :': I rj 'l~ ~ '" 'i\.1 111 1,'\, L~--~J "', , 'r.--------------- I', rr.--~' I .... I I I, I I .... I II I I I "J. 'I' I I r~, -I I I II.... I, I I I ~ '~l I J-Jr Lt........:r-l ..., -,- - .v c::J r-:m (;:. ~Qf^ / I / I / I / I / I / 1/ "----- - ... . f I r I . i H! . . t ~I I :I ! ". '" o m Z :z: ~ ~ '" '" :z: m !:j 9l I ~ I I I I I I I I '..--n iTI'--'lj' I I ~ I' I I I " I ^ I ~ II I I ',, " I /, I " " I t I I I / .... li I " I~ / "f,!~ I ~ I "'.... ''\I ,I I, I I ~/j I'a I, I : Ii /1:1 I!~~J t.,Jj.~"".1 t.,"'. / , / , /.... '........ / , / r~--~l III III III III ,j I, III 1,1 III II' I~~J te !'- i~--1j III ,II III 111 ,~ I~ III ',I III I,' L~--~J r~--11 III 1'1 III ,II ,~ I~ 'II 1,1 1,1 1,1 L~--~J n/ ~ ~ ,.... N' .yr-- o ;'1---" 1'1 II 1'1 111 1'1 III ,j j1 1,1 1,1 III III Lt--~J r~--1i III 111 III III H I~ III 111 II' 1,1 L~--~J i~--rl I ~ II I ,,! 'I'' " ~ II' III 1,1 1,1 L~--~J ...... UilB · ! ! ! 11!111I !:! ~ ~ ~ Ik! ~ ~ Iliff B IjUI b!b ,.... " I : ~ ~ ...... ,.... ..... .... ,.... . - f;\ ~ " {J"\ l;~ 81 "... _--.:; -= .~ Ir"'l -.U // ~ii ~ · _______ll_____/ @ y ~l1. - "T----- ,J:d, ....... ,Ill . III 11l1!8..... 1111 ..... il!I.Ue fl"1gj IQJ i() ~V, @ ~ ) ill / ,.... j \ l!Ji ~ / I ~ 0 ....::::.r ..... I 'tJ , , , , , , , 'r---- -- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I , I " I ------~ , , , ", .... ...... ..... 4> ! r If J J' - (.J Ii} j,; I fit ~r !II I.. il II I. I .... ------.... /1 / I / I / I / I / I / v I I I I I I : i S I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ / / / / / t/ 7 ~ / / ~I t .'.... ~ ~ , , , , .' \ " , , , " . I I I I , I " I ------.>> , , , " ~ tu .nn m 51 ~ enneee ee e I xxxx~~~ ~~~~ il ~H. .. .... i ~X)OC~~~~ ~,~, il inum ~m . . . e 88 8202 22 :Il:3l2::11 2:11 :11:21::11:11 ~ at ~i ! tUUkkUkUk ~I I I Ifn !.if -Ii I . i . ~ :;0 (f) lJ () c .... CD => .... -< )> "'0 "'0 a 15 a. o CD '" cO. => ... '.. . . s ~ . .. . ; '" ... ./lo ~~ Oi ~t . .. ~; ~.. ~.. ~m ~ ~ J!! ~ ~ ~ .. ~ ~ .. :! .. ~ 2 ~ )> +==- o -- ~ '" is '" m ~ ::I <:> z '" f I i i I!! f~J II ~ s; <:> m Z ::c ~ ~ '" '" '" ::c m !:j !B L ) J 00000000 0 e 11~llllill a i I ! 3 I I I i I~ 8- Il~i~1I ! I ~ ~ i a , I ::0 Cf) I~j I I IfU "U I ; { f HI (') I t ~~j I - c: r .... , .' i Cil rh ~ T ::I if - -< " :r> ji- "C -I "C !l a Jl < f. ro Co 0 ro Vi cO' ::I ',I',ill i I i { If ~.J', '1llrlllfl I;l l: ~ ;;; 1 10, 1: '" '" ,.. II,' Z Ii , ,Ill '" l; I lIill ~ 111.... 'I ill lilh . u ~~ I II ! IT . I ~ i ; ." :, -. ... . " .. 1 . .., . HJln Ip g 1 ~ q ..r P Ii Iii II B i ~ B Is I J I . '~I' ila i ! Iii - ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ . ~ i I ~" . III1 , i Ii s ; I I ~ .... Ii u tp -In Id Ln p I j ~ "'-01' g .... nUl Iii Ulh. III . II~ 1 , i5 i i B Ii 'I i n B i ~ B lill q . '~I' dil all ~ ~ II ! ! ,I Uliil. r 111l1111!! i.!. ~ ~ 1111 'II ~ I ! . I I ~ ~ i ;;0 en III f "'0 ,. iiliH! r I i I I r f f ("') ~ f ~Ij c: " . , l .., '" . , '1' .., m r t II rill z l:l j; <> ~ r J ([) ):> '" I, "Ii >- 1:1 ;:, !:1 ~ H! E .. .. "j) .-+ ! 111'1 z Is q '< 0 f I'll tn ~ c.J"1 z ~ "I ~ '" ~ 9~ I ,111I fr' "0 0 i II -I "0 !, a ..... ltllj 'I < !::; ! hll [. ([) m C. " CJ ([) L rJ> cO' ;:, '" ~~ ~1Il ~ . . . CITY OF ARDEN HILLS COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 345 A SUMMARY AN ORDINANCE ADDING SECTION IV. E. ANDSUBDIVISONS4EITHROUGH4E5TOTHE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS RELATING TO THE RE-ZONING OF PROPERTY. On the 8th day of September, 2003, the Arden Hills City Council adopted Ordinance No. 345, and by four affirmative votes pursuant to Minn, Stat. 9412.191, Subd. 4, directed that a swnmary of the Ordinance be published. Arden Hills Ordinance No'345 is entitled "An Ordinance Adding Section IV. E. and Subdivisions One through Five to the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Arden Hills Relating to the Re-Zoning of Property" and will become effective the day following publication of this Ordinance Summary. The Ordinance rezones certain property generally located south of County Road E-2, west of New Brighton Road, east of Cleveland Avenue, and north of the Cottage Villas development; from the Single and Two Family Residential District to the Neighborhood Business District. A copy of the Ordinance is available for inspection by any person during regular business hours at the office of the City Administrator, 1245 West Highway 96, Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112. ATTEST: BEVERLY APLIKOWSKI, MAYOR MICHELLE WOLFE, CITY ADMINISTRATOR Publication Date. Published on the day of ,2003. . Lel!.al Descriptions: PIN: 28.30.23.32.0009 The south seventy-five (75) feet of Lot eight (8), Rohleder's Rome and Garden Acres, Ramsey County, Minnesota, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for Ramsey County, Minnesota, except the east five hundred (500) feet thereof subject to roads and easements of record. PIN: 28.30.23.32.0010 Lot nine (9), Rohleder's Rome and Garden Acres, Ramsey County, Minnesota, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for Ramsey County, Minnesota, except the east five hundred (500) feet thereof subject to roads and easements of record. PIN: 28.30.23.32.0019 . Tract A, Registered Land Survey #401, Ramsey County, Minnesota, except the east two hundred' (200) feet thereof. PIN: 28.30.23.32.0037 Lot eleven (11) except for the southerly eight (8) feet thereof, Rohleder's Rome and Garden Acres, Ramsey County, Minnesota, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for Ramsey Connty, except the east five hundred (500) feet thereof subject to roads and easements of record. PIN: 28.30.23.32.0014 Lot twelve (12) and the south eight (8) feet of Lot eleven (11), Rohleder's Home and Garden Acres, Ramsey County, Minnesota, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for Ramsey County, except the east five hundred (500) feet thereofsubject to roads and easements of record, and except that part included in Registered Land Survey #450. . . . . . CITY OF ARDEN HILLS COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 345 AN ORDINANCE ADDING SECTION IV.E. AND SUBDIVISONS 4El THROUGH 4E5 TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS RELATING TO THE RE-ZONING OF PROPERTY. THE ARDEN IIILLS CITY COUNCIL HEREBY ORDAINS THAT SECTION IV. E. AND SUBDIVISIONS 4El THROUGH 4E5 ARE HEREBY ADDED TO ZONING ORDINANCE #291 OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS TO READ AS FOLLOWS: Section IV. E. Re-Zoning The official tnlI.p fortbe City of Arden HiDs has been amended to indicate that the descnlJed properties have re-zoned as follows: Described ProlJerties. The following properties are generally located south of County Road E-2, west of New Brighton Road, east of Cleveland Avenue, and north of the Cottage Villas Development, and are also described by the following legal descriptions: 1. The south seventy-five (75) feet of Lot eight (8), Rohleder's Home and Garden Acres, Ramsey County, Minnesota, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for Ramsey County, Minnesota, except the east five-hundred (500) feet thereof subject to roads and easements of record, is rezoned from an R-2 zone (Single and Two Family Residential District) to a NB zone (Neighborhood Business District) pursuant to Ordinance #345. 2. Lot nine (9), Rohleder's Home and Garden Acres, Ramsey County, Minnesota according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for Ramsey County, Minnesota, except the east five hundred (500) feet thereof subject to roads and easements of record, is rezoned from an R-2 zone (Single and Two Family Residential District) to a NB zone (Neighborhood Business District) pursuant to Ordinance #345. 3. Tract A, Registered Land Survey #401, Ramsey County, Minnesota, except the east two hundred (200) feet thereof, is rezoned from an R-2 zone (Single . . . and Two Family Residential District) to a NB zone (Neighborhood Business District) pursuant to Ordinance #345. 4. Lot eleven (11) except for the southerly eight (8) feet thereof, Rohleder's Home and Garden Acres, Ramsey County, Minnesota, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for Ramsey County, except the east five hundred (500) feet thereof subject to roads and easements of record, is rezoned from an R-2 zone (Single and Two Family Residential District) to a NB zone (Neighborhood Business District) pursuant to Ordinance #345. 5. Lot twelve (12) and the south eight (8) feet of Lot eleven (11), Rohleder's Home and Garden Acres, Ramsey County, Minnesota, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for Ramsey County, except the east five hundred (500) feet thereof subject to roads and easements or record, and except that part included in Registered Land Survey #450, is rezoned from an R-2 zone (Single and Two Family Residential District) to a NB zone (Neighborhood Business District) pursuant to Ordinance #345. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective the day following its publication. Adoution Date. Passed by the City Council on the City of Arden Hills the 8th day of September, 2003. ATTEST: BEVERLY APLIKOWSKI, MAYOR MICHELLE WOLFE, CITY ADMINISTRATOR Publication Date. Published on the day of ,2003. . . . ~ ~HILLS CITY OF ARDEN HILLS COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 03-59 A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE/MAP FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR CERTAIN PROPERTIES IN THE VICINITY OF COUNTY ROAD E-2 AND CLEVELAND AVENUE WHEREAS, the City of Arden Hills initiated a process to amend the Comprehensive Plan for the neighborhood generally located south of County Road E-2, west of New Brighton Road, east of Cleveland Avenue, and north of the Cottage Villas development. WHEREAS, a public hearing for Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning was conducted on June 4, 2003 before the Arden Hills Planning Commission. WHEREAS, the Arden Hills City Council has determined that amending the Comprehensive Plan is in the best interest of the City. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the Arden Hills City Council does hereby amend the Future Land Use Map as shown on attached exhibit A. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN mLLS TmS stb DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2003. BEVERLY APLIKOWSKl, MAYOR ATTEST: MICHELLE A. WOLFE, CITY ADMINISTRATOR . . . Exhibit A: Future Land Use Map Amendment Se tember 8 2003 Silseth, Pang From: _t: Subject: ~ September 15 2003,doc (84 KB) Silseth, Pang Thursday, September 11, 20032:47 PM Timesaver; Bulletin; CTV15; Focus News; Gammell, Ken; Pioneer Press; Ramsey Co, Sherriffs; Startribune Sept. 15, 2003 City Council Work Session Agenda Pang Silseth Office Support Specialist City of Arden Hills Phone: 651.634.5120 Fax: 651.634.5137 Website: www.ci.arden-hills.mn.us t ~ 1