HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-11-05
~
---A~HILLS
Arden Hills City Council
Mayor:
Beverly Aplikowski
Councilmembers:
David Grant
Brenda Holden
Gregg Larson
Lois Rem
1245 w. Highway 96
Arden Hills, Minnesota
55112
651.634.5120
wn'w .eLa rden-hills.mn.us
REGULAR MEETING
Monday
July 11, 2005
City Vision
A strong community that values OUf unique environment, our fiscal soundness,
and our tradition as a desirable cit in which to live, work, and la .
Social Gathering-
Recognizing the retirements of Fred Bell and Fred Reed from 6:00 PM to 7:00 PM at City Hall.
Agenda
City Council Meeting Convenes 7:00 PM
Call to Order
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. June 27, 2005 City Council Minutes
B. June 20,2005 Work Session Minutes
3. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Claims and Payroll
B. Approve Resolution #05-44. Approving
the Application for the New Use of Tax
Forfeited Land at the Intersection of
Amble Road and Dellwood Street
4. PUBLIC INQffiRIESIINFORMATIONAL
,
Those items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be
routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion under
a Consent Calendar fonnat. There will be no separate discussion of
these items, unless a Council Member so requests, in which event,
tbe item will be removed from the general order of business and
considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda.
Public Inquiries/Informational is an opportunity for citizens to
bring to the Council's attention any items not currently on the
agenda. In addressing the Council, please state yoar name and
address for the record, and a brief summary of the specific item
being addressed to the Council. To allow adequate time for each
person wishing to address the Council, we ask that individnals limit
their comments to three (3) minutes. Written documents may be
distributed to the Council prior to the meeting, or as bench copies, to
allow a more timely presentation.
Arden Hills City Council Agenda
July II, 2005
Page 2
5, PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. City Council Recognizition of Fred Bell's and Fred Reed's Retirements from the Operations and
Maintenance Department
6. NEW BUSINESS
A. Resolution #05-45: Approval of Royal Oaks Special Use Permit (Old Scott Clark
City Hall Site)
B. Resolution #05-46: Approval of Amended Special Use Permit for Peter Hellegers
Presbyterian Homes
C. 2006 Lift Station Rehabilitation Project-Authorize Preparation of Greg Brown/Tom Moore
Plans and Specifications
7. Unfinished Bnsiness
A. TCAAP Update
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
A. Council member Holden
B. Councilmember Grant
C. Councilmember Rem
D. Councilmember Larson
Scott Clark
E. Mayor Aplikowski
ADJOURN
"
.
.
Message
Page I of I
Gritz, Jackie
From: Gritz, Jackie
Thursday, July 07, 20054:32 PM
smccann@startribune.com; bob, fletcher@co.ramsey,mn,us; bulletin@liilienews.com:
cwilson@ctv15.org; etopinka@pioneerpress.com; info@mnsunpub,com; ken.gammell@ci,mounds-
view,mn,us; kmaltman@msn.com: mlsmith@startribune,com
Subject: 7/11/2005 Regular City Council Agenda
Sent:
To:
Jackie Gritz, Office Support Specialist
City of Arden Hills
Phone 651,634,5120
Fax 651,634,5137
www.ci.arden-hills.mn.us
.
7/7/2005
.
.
.
.
~
~LS
Approved:
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
JUNE 27, 200S, 7:00 P.M.
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 124S WEST HIGHWAY 96
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
CALL TO ORDERlROLL CALL
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Beverly Aplikowski called to order the
regular City Council meeting at 7:00 p.m.
Present:
Mayor Beverly Aplikowski, Councilmembers David Grant, Gregg Larson,
and Brenda Holden.
Absent:
Councilmember Lois Rem.
Also present were City Administrator, Michelle Wolfe; Director of Operations &
Maintenance, Thomas Moore; Finance Director/Treasurer, Murtuza Siddiqui; Community
Development Director, Scott Clark; City Engineer, Greg Brown; City Planner, Pete
Hellegers; and Recording Secretary, Kathleen Altman.
1.
APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA
Ms. Wolfe stated Item 6.A. will be approval of Resolution 05-42. Item 6D should be changed to
read Resolution 05-43. In addition, she received news today that the candidate on item 6F had
withdrawn his application, so that item should be removed from the agenda.
MOTION: Councilmember Larson moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a motion to
approve the meeting agenda as amended. The motion carried unanimously (4-0).
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. June 13,2005 Work Session Minutes
B. May 31, 2005 City Council Minutes
C. May 16, 2005 Work Session Minutes
Councilmember Holdeu requested the following changes: None.
Councilmember Grant requested the following changes: June 13, 2005 City Council Work
Session, Page 3, third paragraph, should read: "Councilmember Grant would not be agreeable to
moving the proj ect forward. . . '
ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
JUNE 27, 2005
.
2
.
Councilmember Larson requested the following changes: June 13, 2005 City Council Work
Session Minutes, Page I, second full paragraph from the bottom, last sentence should read:
"Community Development Director Clark. .." Page 4, first bullet under his report should read:
"Councilmember Larson wants to move forward with a new name for TCAAP, but wants to make
sure that the TCAAP property does not become a separate entity to the rest of Arden Hills". May
16, 2005 City Work Session, Page 9, under his comments, second bullet point should read:
"Councilmember Larson requested the City staff contact the clinical studies-Medtec Firm located
on Round Lake Road to see if they have plans for future expansion".
Mayor Aplikowski requested the following changes: None.'
Ms. Wolfe requested the following changes; None.
MOTION: Councilmember Larson moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a motion to
approve the May 31,2005 City Council Meeting Minutes as presented, the June
13,2005 Council Work Session Minutes as amended and the May 16,2005 Work
Session Minutes as amended. The motion carried unanimously (4-0).
3. CONSENT CALENDAR
c.
Claims and Payroll
City Council Approval of the Revised Emergency Operations Plan
Rcsolution No. 05-40: Appointment of Evan Cordes to the Communications
Committee
City Council Authorization to City Staff to contract for TCAAP appraisal services in
an amount not to exceed $15,000
City Council Motion to Approve the Proposed Employee Recognition Policy
.
a.
b.
d.
e.
MOTION: Councilmember Grant moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a motion to
approve the Consent Calendar and to authorize execution of all necessary
documents contained therein. The motion carried unanimously (4-0).
4. PUBLIC INQUlRIES/lNFORMATlONAL
A. Girl Scouts
Mayor Aplikowski presented Girl Scouts Sarah Engberg and Andrea Paulet with Certificate of
Outstanding Achievement awards.
5.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
None.
.
2
.
.
ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
JUNE 27, 2005
3
6. NEW BUSINESS
A. Holidav Station Store - Approval of Special Use PermitlPreliminarv and Final Plat
Mr. Hcllegcrs requested Council consider the requested Master and Final PUD/Special Use
Permit and PreliminarylFinal Plat for the development of the property at the southwest corner of
Highway 96 and Round Lake Road. He noted at the June 1,2005 Planning Commission meeting,
the Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval with conditions as noted in staffs
June 27, 2005 report.
He recommended Council approve the Master and Final PUD/Special Use Permit and
PreliminarylFinal Plat for the development of the property.
Councilmcmbcr Larson stated he noticed on some of the review questions included in the packet
that some of the existing trees on the northeast and southeast could be saved and it sounded like
the developer intended to level the lot and put in all new landscaping. He asked if there was any
intention of saving any of the trees on the property. Mr. Hellegers replied there might be a
possibility to preserve some of the trees, but most of the trees that were there now would be in the
path ofthe building.
Councilmcmbcr Larson asked if there would be any landscaping along the west side of tbe
building. Mr. Hellegers replied they had requested the developer put in landscaping along the
areas which would have the most impact on the residential areas, particularly the north side. He
noted there ,,'ere also power lines along the west side of the property, which would be impacted
by mature landscaping.
Councilmembcr Larson noted he was still concerned there was insufficient landscaping along
the back of the building. He asked if they could include lower screening as a condition of the
permit. Mr. Hellegers noted the developer had four times the required landscaping; however,
they might be able to shift some of the landscaping around on the site.
Councilmember Larson asked if the amount of fal(ade lighting would be reduced. Mr.
Hcllegers responded reduced lighting was not included in the conditions and the Planning
Commission did not recommend it, but if Council wanted to have this, it could be made as a
condition of approval. He indicated this was a minor concern.
Councilmember Larson stated it would be nice if the north driveway could be moved further
south away from Highway 96. Mr. Hellegers stated applicant was aware of this and was working
on a revised plan to drop the driveway down to enter toward the middle of the canopy. He noted
however, they needed sufficient space for semi-truck movability. He indicated both applicant and
applicant's engineer were present to answer any questions.
. Councilmember Larson inquired about the drainage. Mr. Hellegers outlined the drainage and
water retention plans and noted applicant was addressing the drainage issue.
3
ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
JUNE 27, 2005
4
.
Councilmember Larson asked if berming was discussed as a way to screen the station from
Highway 96. Mr. Hellegers replied there was not a lot of space for a berm, but it would meet the
capacity requirement.
Councilmember Larson stated he believed the City needed to try and do a better job of sticking
to the kind of building materials they wanted to see on buildings and noted efface was being used
in the construction of this building, but efface did not have the quality they wanted and was not
consistent with the design standard requirements. He stated he wanted to see building material
other than efface. Mr. Clark stated a 100 percent brick building looked too institutional, so they
were trying to come up with a building that had a predominant amount of brick, but also
incorporated other materials that had interesting architecture. He noted efface would break up the
architecture.
Councilmember Larson believed there were other alternatives to use other than efface, that
would lend quality to the building. He noted this building was a gateway to the City and it was a
good place to start being as demanding as they could to put in a quality development.
Mayor Aplikowski asked what would the alternative building material be if they did not use
efface. Councilmember Larson replied the developer could use a white ceramic brick if they
wanted a contrast with the red brick or a precast material. He noted there were other alternatives .
out there.
Councilmember Grant stated the Planning Commission minutes tend to imply that the Planning
Commission voted unanimously for approval, but noted the Chair of the Planning Commission
was absent, so it was a 6-0 vote. However, it was still a unanimous vote with the members who
were present. He stated it appeared that some of the columns were brick and some efface. He
asked if that was an error. Mr. Hellegers replied the columns he was referring to were for the car
wash entrance.
Councilmember Grant asked if the applicant had submitted any color photographs of any of
their other stations with this design. Mr. Hellegers replied they had not submitted photographs of
those stations, but they did have a sample board.
Victor Sacco, Sr. Manager of Real Estate for Holiday Companies Holiday Station Stores,
presented the sample board.
Councilmember Holden asked if there would be larger caliper trees put in. Mr. Hellegers
replied most of the trees would be in 2-3 caliper inch range, with some 3 - 4\1, inch caliper
category. He noted if they could save some of the trees, those trees could be countcd toward the
landscaping rcquirement.
Councilmember Holden agreed with Councihnember Larson's comments regarding the efface. .
Mr. Hellegers noted efface was a small component of the building, with brick being
approximately 80 percent of the building. He also indicated there was additional glass added to
the site and the building was a nice looking building.
4
.
.
.
ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
JUNE 27, 2005
5
Councilmember Holden stated this building was not meeting the standards set by the City.
Councilmember Larson asked if it was possible to move the road farther south. Mr. Sacco
responded they were revising the site plan to shift it down a little bit. He stated they wanted to
make the northerly pump island convenient for the residents coming off of Round Lake without
having to make an awkward turn. He stated they could shift this to the south, but for ease of
access, the flow should be to get off Round Lake Road as quickly as possible to access the site.
Councilmember Larson asked if the islands could be angled. Mr. Sacco replied if they were
angled, the people coming off of Highway 96 would have to jog and the best option was to not
angle the islands.
Councilmember Larson asked if they put a condition on this development that Council wanted
to see some other building material other than efface, what would be his response to this. Mr.
Sacco responded he believed this was an attractive looking building and if it were to be all brick,
the building would lose its curb appeal and it would be too dark without any definition. He noted
they had been working with staff extensively on this and he believed the building looked good.
He agreed this was a prominent location and they wcreexcited to build the development.
Councilmember Larson stated he agreed the building should not be all brick, but he did not like
the efface. He did not believe it lent the quality to the development they were seeking.
Mayor Aplikowski asked what the percentage of efface being used was. Mr. Hellegers noted it
was approximately 20 percent of the building. He indicated this would be a nice looking building
for the use.
Mayor Aplikowski stated efface was just on the small strip along the top of the building and the
car wash colunms.
Councilmember Larson noted efface did not hold up over time and when they adopted their
standards, it was the intention of the City to not have efface on buildings. He stated he did not
want to back down on the quality ofthis development. He indicated the white looked nice, but he
wanted a different building material used.
Mayor Aplikowski stated she did not have a problem with this and believed they were "late to
the game" with making this change and this should have been addressed at the Planning
Commission.
Councilmember Holden stated they had adopted the building standards and she did not believe it
was too late in the game to require this. Mr. Hellegers noted efface was not a material listed as
being acceptable, but there was some give and take on this development, including the additional
landscaping, pitched roof, brick on the columns, and the monument sign. He believed this was a
good compromise and would be a nice development.
5
ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
JUNE 27, 2005
6
.
Mayor Aplikowski stated if they were being required to use something other than efface, Council
needed to specifically state what type of material they needed to use.
Councilmember Larson stated the City had established a standard and it needed to be adhered to.
He indicated they needed to enforce their standards.
Mayor Aplikowski stated if Councilmember Larson wanted them to use a different material, he
had to state what kind of material should be used. Council member Larson stated he did not
want to limit the developer to specific materials, but rather give them flexibility to work with staff
on a material that would work better.
Mayor Aplikowski stated she did not understand the efface criteria because it was a useful
building material in small amounts.
Mr. Sacco stated they had worked hard on this site plan and the landscaping had been the main
issue, which they had worked with staff to add the additional landscaping. He indicated he was
not even sure the building would be seen from the road because of the additional landscaping
being required. He asked Council take that into consideration. Hc asked if Council wanted a
different building material, could they cut back on some of the landscaping. He noted the
landscaping was an amazing amount of money. He stated there was a small amount of efface
being used on the building and he believed the additional landscaping was a good compromise. .
Councilmember Grant asked if this was the same design being used in other communities. Mr.
Sacco stated this was the same design as used in Shakopee and Chaska.
Councilmember Grant asked if applicant anticipated larger trucks using this facility. Mr. Sacco
stated they had no interest in servicing large diesel trucks, but they would serve the smaller trucks,
such as FedEx and UPS trucks, as well as residential diesel cars and trucks.
Councilmember Grant stated he would not want the City Forester to require that a healthy tree
remain because not all healthy trees are attractive. He stated he wanted to change requirement 2
to read: "To save as many existing quality, well placed, and healthy trees as possible."
MOTION: Councilmember Grant moved and Mayor Aplikowski seconded a motion to
approve Planning Case 05-13: Holiday Station Stores, Inc. with the recommended
revised conditions of approval, with a change to item 2 to read: "save as many
existing, well placed, and healthy trees as possible".
Councilmember Holden asked ifit was the City's rcquirement for the caliper inches for the trees.
Mr. Hellegers replied the City wanted additional landscaping to ensure that the lighting would
not have a negative impact to the residential properties. He stated the lighting was not an issue
however.
.
Councilmember Holden stated if the lighting already met the Codes and with the additional
landscaping, she had a concern that the building would not be seen from the road. Mr. Hellcgers
6
.
.
.
ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
JUNE 27, 2005
7
replied there was a lot of landscaping, but the building would still be seen from certain angles, but
not necessarily from the north.
Councilmember Larson stated this site had enormous potential given what would develop on the
northeast side and Planned Unit Development was a process of negotiation.
MOTION: Councilmember Larson moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a Motion to
amend the previous Motion to add a condition as follows: "Replacement of the
efface with another higher quality building material consistent with our existing
design standards that still maintains the architectural distinctiveness of the building
as proposed."
Mayor ApJikowski stated she would vote no on this because she believed this was not the time or
place for this.
Councilmember Grant stated he would also vote no on this because the only other alternatives
would be stone, brick or glass and he believed they needed to discuss this further and to convey to
the Planning Commission the materials approved by the City Council. He noted Holiday Station
Stores wanted to maintain an image for their stores.
Councilmember Larson agreed that Holiday Station Stores wanted to maintain their image, but
the City also wanted to maintain its image and they needed to enforce this.
Mayor Aplikowski called the question.
Motion on the amendment failed 2-2 (Councilmember Grant and Mayor Aplikowski opposed).
CounciJmember Grant asked if applicant would consider changing some of the pillars to brick.
Mr. Sacco replied they would do that ifthey could keep the efface.
MOTION: Councilmember Grant moved and Councilmember Larson seconded a Motion to
amend his original motion as follows: Add Condition number II to read, "Add
brick surface to the two front pillars on the building."
The amended motion carried unanimously (4-0).
The original motion carried unanimously (4-0).
Mr. Hellegers requested Council specifically approve Resolution No. 05-42.
MOTION: Councilmembcr Grant moved and Mayor Aplikowski seconded a motion to approve
Resolution 05-42, Holiday Station Stores, with the eleven conditions.
The motion carried unanimously (4-0).
7
ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
JUNE 27, 2005
,
8
.
B. Awardin!! of the 200S Seal Coatin!! Bids
Mr; Brown stated bids were received and opened from two (2) contractors for the project. Allied
Blacktop submitted the low bid with a total bid amount of $34,754.56. He noted the low bid was
approximately 7.6% lower than the Engineer's estimate. He noted there was also an alternate bid
with Allied Blacktop submitting also being the low bidder in the amount of $49,600.00, which
was approximately 5.3% lower than the Engineer's estimate.
He recommended Council award the 2005 Seal Coating Project, including the alternative, to
Allied Blacktop for a total amount of$39,714.56.
Councilmember Grant asked what the alternate was. Mr. Brown replied it was Cummings Park
area.
Councilmember Grant requested a copy of what bid papers went out and what was produced.
MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Larson seconded a motion to
award the 2005 Seal Coating and alternate to Allied Blacktop in the total amount
of$39,714.56. The motion carried unanimously (4-0).
c.
City Council Approval to Replace the Citv Hall Copier Machine
.
Mr. Siddiqui stated the lease on the City Hall copy machine was set to expire on July 26, 2005.
He recommended the Council authorize the purchase of Canon Image Runner 8070 from Canon
USA at a quoted price of $27,157.50 and return the leased copier. The account would also require
a general fund budget amendment in the amount of $2,157.50.
Councilmember Grant stated there were a number of pieces of information he would have like
to have seen, including the number of images over the life of the unit, what are the existing costs
versus the future costs, etc. He stated he would be voting no, but he believed this was a good
deal. He indicated the reason he was voting no was because there was insufficient information for
him to make a decision. He stated going forward, he would not vote in favor of proposals that
were missing key information.
Councilmember Holden agreed, but noted the staff had provided all of the information at a
previous Work Session where Councilmember Grant was not in attendance. Councilmember
Grant replied hc did not realize that and he requested the Work Session inforn1ation be sent to
him.
MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Larson seconded a motion to
amend the general flmd budget in the amount of$2,157.50. The motion carried (3-
I) (Councilmember Grant opposed).
.
MOTION: Councilmember Larson moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a motion to
approve the purchase of a Canon Image Runner 8070 from Canon USA at a quoted
8
I
.
.
.
ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
JUNE 27, 2005
9
price of $27,157.50 and retum the leased copier. The motion carried unanimously
(3-1) (Councilmember Grant opposed).
D. Annrove Resolution OS-43 Grev Fox Curve Variance for the 200S PMP Proiect
Mr. Brown stated MnDOT had requested the City obtain a variance for the horizontal curve at the
west end of Grey Fox Road in order to be eligible for State Aid funding. The proposed curve will
match the existing curve. He recommended the Council pass the variance for Grey Fox Road.
MOTION: Councilmember Larson moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a motion to
adopt Resolution 05-43 Requesting a Variance from Minnesota Rules for State Aid
Operations Chapter 8820. The motion carried unanimously (4-0).
E. Annrove Resolution OS-41 Annointinl! Arden Hills Resident and City Council
Member to the Northwest Areas Librarv Access Task Force
Ms. Wolfe stated the Ramsey County Library Board had created a Northwest Area Library Access
Task Force. This group would be studying and evaluating services in the northwest portion of the
County. Each of the three cities involved was being asked to name representatives to the task
force. She indicated Mayor Aplikowski was recommending the appointment of Mary Anne
Lindberg as the representative to the committee.
MOTION: Councilmember Grant moved and Councilmember Larson seconded a motion to
adopt Resolution 05-41 A Resolution Appointing Members to the 2005 Northwest
Areas Library Access Task Force. The motion carried unanimously (4-0).
Ms. Wolfe stated there were also two additional seats available that the Library Task Force would
be assigning and if anyone was interested, they could pick up an application at the library.
F. ;\oore"le the aooeintment ef JeseOR Bianee as Olleratiens and Maintenanee 'Verker
filr the City ef ArdeB lliIls REMOVED FROM THE AGENDA
7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A. TCAAP Undate
Mr. Clark updated the Council on TCAAP.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Ms. Wolfe - None.
Councilmember Holden - Asked to put on a Work Session agenda the monitors in the
Chambers. She stated she would also like added to a Work Session agenda a discussion of
building materials.
9
ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
JUNE 27, 2005
t
10
.
Councilmember Grant - None.
Councilmember Larson - Asked what was the resolution of Sharon Klump's issue. Ms. Wolfe
stated the City Attorney had indicated they had filed an appeal.
Mayor Aplikowski - Requested staff set up a joint Work Session meeting with the Council and
the Planning Commission to discuss building materials, etc. She suggested if the Planning cases
are light in July or August, Council could attend a meeting on that night.
Mayor Aplikowski adjourned the Regular City Council Meeting at 9:00 p.m.
Beverly Aplikowski
Mayor
Michelle Wolfe
City Administrator
NOTICE OF MEETINGS
The next Council Meeting will be held Monday, July 11,2005 at 7:00 p.m. at the Arden Hills .
Council Chambers.
.
10
,
.
. r
~
~HILLS
Approved:
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION
MONDA Y, JUNE 20, 2005,7:30 P.M.
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 1245 WEST I1IGlIWAY 96
Call To Order
Mayor Aplikowski called the meeting to ordcr at 5:00 PM.
Present: Mayor Aplikowski, Councilmembers: Gregg Larson, Brenda Holden, Lois Rem (6:25
to 8:00 PM)
Abscnt: Council Member David Grant
Staff present: City Administrator, Michelle Wolfe; Finance Director, Murtuza Siddiqui;
Assistant to the City Administrator, Schawn Johnson; Operations and Maintcnance Director,
Tom Moorc; City Planner, Peter Hellegers; City Engineer, Greg Brown
Lake Johanna I<'ire Department Cost Sharing Discussion
The Lake Johanna Fire Department Board of Directors has bccn studying the issue of fire
dcpartment funding between the three members (Arden Hills, Shoreview, and North Oaks) for
about a year. Historically the operating budgct has been divided in the following manner:
. City of Arden Hills 25.0%
· City of North Oaks 12.5%
. City ofShorcview 62.5%
The Fire Board rccently reached a conscnsus and approved a new approach for budgeting future
fire department cxpenses. In 2006, thc operating budget will be based on a new fonnula. The
new fOllliula that was approved by thc Lake Johanna Fire Board is based upon the following four
factors:
. Population
. Households
. Market Valuc
. Fire Calls (5 year average)
25%
25%
10%
40%
Under the proposed fonnula, thc City of Arden Hills will be paying 26.3% of the total annual
budget. Therefore, this is not a significant increase for the City, but the preliminary amounts are
based upon a fonnula that could change over time.
Councilmember Larson said that he has been a Lake Johanna Fire Department board member for
. many years and that thc current percentage breakdown of firc related costs between the three
I
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION MINUTES
June 20, 2005
2
communities is very confusing. Thcre is no right or wrong way to do this, but the proposed cost
sharing systcm seems to be morc cquitable and easier to understand for cvcrybody involved.
Fire ChiC[ Tim Boehlkc stated that numerous fonnulas and scenarios were discussed by the
board members.
Councilmember Larson stated that the proposed fonnula is easily explainable and is much more
accountablc to the public. Each year the Lake Johanna Fire Dcpartment board members will
review the fCllmula. Because all three communities arc unique in its fire call numbers,
population, houschold numbers, and propcrty values the new proposal will take into account
these four areas when proposing futurc expenditures. The new proposal also takes into account
future growth and potential land dcvelopment.
Councilmember Holden asked for the definition of a firc call.
Fire Chief Boehlke stated that a fire call is classified as a car accident with injury, firc calls, false
alarms, and Hazmat scenes. The firc department averages the numbers ovcr a five year period
when proposing the annual budgct.
Mayor Aplikowski asked what is considered market value.
. Councilmcmber Larson cxplained that market value is a propcrty owner's taxable property.
Councilmember Holdcn asked why is the City's fire calls are so high~
Fire Chief Boehlke said that Arden Hills is impacted by a large number of falsc alarm calls,
traffic accidents, Bethel University, and Mounds View High Schools.
Councilmember Larson statcd that cutting down on the number of false alarms in Arden Hills
would reduce the City costs for fire service.
City Administrator Wolfe noted the Lakc Johanna Fire Department board is recommending
option #3 to thc City Council for future consideration. The proposal would result in a slight
increase for Arden Hills and North Oaks.
Lake Johanna Fire Chicf Tim Boehlke stated that thc 2006 budget being proposed to the City
will utilize the new formula.
Prcsbvterian Homes-Site Plan Status
City Planner Petcr Hellegers provided an overview to the City Council of the application for
review of a Special Use Pennit Amcndment lor the addition of approximatcly 13,126 square feet
to the south cnd of the McKnight Care Center building at Presbyterian Homes. The additional
space would allow the facility to be changed from 3 bed-units to mostly single bed units and
. double bed units.
2
e
.
.
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION MINUTES
June 20, 2005
3
John Mehrkens of Senior Housing Partners was available to answer any questions or concerns
that the City Council had rcgarding this proposed addition to Presbyterian Homes.
Mr. Mehrkens providcd the City Council with a brief overvicw of the proposed addition to the
Presbyterian Homcs facility. The proposed addition would result in a more single unit rooms,
improved dining room areas, and increased equipment storage areas. Thc current driveway will
remain in its cxisting location. Landscaping will be added to thc outside of the proposed
addition. The existing landscape screcning will be saved. The proposed project is a three story
addition with a fourth floor rooftop garden/patio for paticnts to be outside. Also, the proposed
plans would cause minimal topography changes to the existing site.
Councilmember Larson cxpressed concern about the possibility of loud noises being creatcd by
the HV AC system.
Mr. Mchrkens said that the HV AC system is state of the art and that this should not be an issue.
The HV AC units would be locatcd behind a wall to help minimize the sound.
Councilmember Holden said that some neighborhood residents may be affected by the fourth
floor garden area. Residents of Presbytcrian Homes may be able to look into a resident's front
yard.
Mr. Mehrkens said that the garden area will only be utilized by patients and will be not used in
the evenings.
Mayor Aplikowski asked if the ncighbors expresscd any concerns at the neighborhood meeting.
Mr. Mehrkens said that overall the neighborhood was favorable to this project and understood
the reasoning behind the proposed expansion.
No Smoking in the Parks Policy
At the March 22, 2005 meeting thc Parks, Trails, and Recreation Committee (PTRC) discussed
the possibility of cstablishing a no smoking policy for City parks. Committcc member David
McClung agrecd to take thc lead on this project, research the project, and report back to the
PTRC at the April 26Lh mecting.
At the April 26Lh meeting, Ms. Katie Engman from the Ramscy County Tobacco Coalition made
a presentation to the PTRC regarding what other communities are doing in regards to no
smoking policies in local parks. Also, three Mounds View High School Students gave a
presentation regarding the negative effects of tobacco. The three stlldcnts are members of the
Peers Acting to Challenge Tobacco (PACT) group.
At the May 24, 2005, PTRC meeting the committee discussed the possibility of establishing a no
smoking policy in the City's parks. The PTRC passed a motion (5-0) recommending that the
City Council adopt a no smoking policy for City parks.
3
e
,
.
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION MINUTES
Junc 20, 2005
4
Suzanne Florey, Christine Florey, and Nicole Holm representing the Mounds View High School
chapter of the Pccrs Acting to Challenge (PACT) group gave the City Council a prcscntation on
the ill-effects of smoking in City parks. The PACT group provided thc City Council with a
visual display of the cigarette buds that were picked up at local parks. The PACT group is
seeking thc support of thc City Council by passing a policy that would not allow smoking within
the Ardcn Hills park system. Similar policies havc becn passed hy the Cities of New Brighton
and Shoreview.
Operations and Maintenance Dircctor Tom Moore stated that the PTRC passed a motion (5-0)
that recommended a no-smoking ban be implemcntcd by the City Council in the City parks.
Councilmember Holden asked how many signs would be posted and what is thc additional cost
to the City.
Operations and Maintenancc Director Moore said that there are 100 signs availahle to the City at
no cost. The City has sign posts in stock that could be uscd for these signs. The only City
expensc would be for labor costs and sign posts.
Councilmember Larson said that he supports a no-smoking ban in the parks. He also thanked the
MVH S students for their commitment to the PACT project.
Councilmembcr Holden asked ifthc City could enforce the no-smoking policy at Tony Schmidt
Park.
Councilmember Holden requcsted that City staff proceed with a draft no-smoking in the parks
policy and bring it back to the City Council for furthcr revicw at a later date.
City staff will bring a drat! policy back to thc City Council at a later date.
Update on thc Lexington Avenue Construction Project Cost
City Enginccr Greg Brown provided the City Council with an overvicw of the Lexington Avenue
project. In 2004, the City budgeted $115,000 from thc Water Utility Fund and $185,000 for
roadway construction, ROW Acquisition, and cngineering expenses. Overall the project is
expected to be $90,000 over budget. Possible cost savings to the City could be reducing thc sizc
of the proposed retaining walls along Lexington A venue.
City Administrator Michelle Wolfe said that City staff wants to inform the City Council that this
project will be over budget. The projected expenditures involving the ROW acquisition were
underestimated. It is imperative that communication betwccn the City and Ramsey County be
improved in the fhture.
City Engineer Brown noted that the cost overrun would have been worse if the original sidewalk
plan had not been modified.
4
e
e
.
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION MINUTES
June 20, 2005
5
Councilmembcr Holden asked how close the CIP budget will be with thc Lcxington A venue and
Red Fox/Grcy Fox projects going on simultaneously.
City Engineer Brown said that they appear to bc within budget at this time.
Councilmember Larson asked if the City would be better off bidding PMP projects in the winter
months. The City may be able to get better pricing at this time of the year.
City Engineer Brown said that the 2006 PMP project is schcdulcd to be bid out this winter. We
will be able to see if wc get better pricing at that time.
Finance Director Murtuza Siddiqui stated that a budget amendment would be needed by the City
Council in the future to cover thc cost overruns for the Lexington Avenue project.
2006 Budl!et Calendar-Budl!et Discussion
Financc Director Murtuza Siddiqui provided thc City Council with an overview of the 2006
budgcting process. At this time, the Statc Legislature is in session and there has been no
decision reached regarding levy limits. The t()llowing factors have been idcntified that may
influence the 2006 budget. They are the following:
. Tax Levy-3% Proposal
· Overall budget increases for 2006
. Salaries and Benefits-Employec step increases/COLA increase
. Increase in employee bencfit costs
. Five Year Capital Improvement Plan
. Highway 96 Landscaping
Councilmember Larson suggested that the City explore new ways to fund improvements to the
park system. Each year improvements to the park system are dcpcndcnt upon charitable
gambling revcnues. The current parks improvement fund is under $200,000.
Mayor Aplikowski asked what is the replacement schcdulc for playground equipment.
Operations and Maintenance Director Tom Moore said that the City rcplaces playground
equipment on an average of 12 to ] 5 years.
Councilmcmber Holden requcsted that the Northwest Youth and Family Services be included in
the City's budget for 2006 and she mentioncd that Councilmember Grant requested that pay
increascs for the City Council be discussed in this year's budget.
Councilmember Larson said that pay is not the deciding factor regarding why wc are City
Councilmembers. Although, it is an item worth discussing in the future.
5
e
e
e
"
.
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION MINUTES
June 20, 2005
6
City Administrator Wolfe said that a factor in considcring a pay increase could be based upon thc
time, effort, and complcxity of the issues being dealt with the City at this time. Other factors
such as market data could be reviewed as well.
Finance Director Siddiqui asked the City Council what percentage of a COLA increase they
would feel comfortable with in 2006.
City Administrator Wolfe stated that the Local 4gers are scheduled to receive a 2.5% COLA
increase in 2006.
Councilmember Rem suggcstcd that UnIon and non-union staff members both receive 2.5%
COLA increases for 2006.
City Council and City statl members will continue this discussion at a latcr date.
City Administrator Wolfe said that a budget calendar was also included in this packet for futurc
reference. A work session mceting will be schedulcd in the near future to discuss the proposed
2006 budget in more detail.
Proposed Replacement of the City Hall Copier
Financc Director Murutza Siddiqui provided the City Council with an overview of the City's
current copier lease agreement with Ikon. The lease agreement with Ikon is scheduled to expire
on July 26, 2005. If necessary, Ikon has agreed to allow the City to lease the copier on a
monthly basis. The City's current copier has made approximatcly 1.2 million copies the past
three years on the existing copier. The typical life expectancy of a copier is about two million
Images.
Since the City has had vcry good luck with the Canon copier, staff began to focus its attcntion
this particular brand.
In March, City staff received a price quote of $25,538 (including sales tax) to purchase a Cannon
Image Runner 7200. The maintcnance cost was quoted at $270.00 per month with a minimum
usage of 30,000 images per month. The proposal also included a 36 month lease option at
$740.00 per month. The buyout price for our cxisting copier is $12,032.
City staff also contacted the local Canon representative directly to see if the City could purchase
directly from thc manufacturer. Staff met with a local reprcsentative from Canon and requested
a proposal. According to Canon, the City's current copicr is being discontinued. The Canon
representative suggested the Canon 8070 model. This model copies more pages per minute and
offers additional features that our current copier is not capable of offering. These featurcs
include:
. folding featurc;
. book making capabilities;
. and inscrtion of paper dividers.
6
e
e
e
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION MINUTES
June 20, 2005
7
The quotcd price for this copier is $27,157.50. The projectcd maintcnance cost is $165.00 per
month of $.0055 per image. The projected maintenance costs over a three year period is
$5,940.00 assuming a rate of 30,000 images per month.
Comparing the two proposals, thc copier iTom Canon USA costs $1619.50 morc than the Ikon
proposal, but the proposal from Canon includes additional features plus the latest in copier
technology.
Councilmembcr Holden raised concerns about overage charges with our last lease agrcemcnt.
Financc Director Siddiqui said that the City was being billcd on a monthly basis and not a
quarterly basis. This resulted in the additional charges, but the billing problem was resolved
through Ikon.
Councilmembcr Holden suggested that the City purchase the new Canon copier.
This item will be brought forth to the City Council for approval at the June 27'" City Council
meeting.
Emplovee Recognition Poliev
City Administrator Michelle Wolfe provided the City Council with an overview of the changes
that have been made to the proposed employee recognition policy. The proposed changes wcre
based upon thc recommendations givcn to City staff at the May 16th work session meeting. After
further revicw and discussion a fcw minor revisions were made to the proposed employee
recognition, employee of thc year, and employee money, safety, and time saving
recommendation policies. The employee recognition policies will be brought forth to the City
Council for fonnal approval at the June 27th City Council meeting.
Councilmember Rcm left the meeting at 8:00 PM.
Citv Committee and Commission Guidelines
City Administrator Wolfe provided the City Council with an overvicw of the historical
procedurcs and meeting proccdures of the different commissions, committees, and task forces.
At this time, the City does not have a consistent process when it involves the operation,
appointment, and formation of commissions, committees, and task torces in Arden Hills. Mayor
Aplikowski and City Administrator Wolfe began the process of reviewing past practices in order
to develop sornc guidelines that could be used in defining how the City operates its committees,
commissions, and task forces in the future.
At this timc, this process is in the initial stage of development and will need City Council input
to ensurc that a consensus is made to move this project forward. Comments and directions
received during tbese preliminary discussions will be incorporatcd into a more formal report and
outline in the near futurc.
7
e
I
e
. .
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION MINUTES
June 20, 2005
8
Councilmember Larson rcqucsted that there be more of a distinction between standing
committees and City Council appointed committees. In the past, he has rcccivcd complaints
from residents that the City Council does not listcn to committccs, commissions, or task forces.
Therefore, these groups are unable to provide a finished product. It is important that a task force
has a charge or mission to completc a quality work product that can be used by the City Council.
He believes that the City has the right number of committees at this time.
Councilmember Holdcn would like to see term limits implemented on committees.
Mayor Aplikowski asked the City Council if they would like to implement term limits or
implement an annual rencwal process.
Councilmember Larson
statutory requirement.
commiSSIOn.
mentioned that the Planning Commission is very important and is a
It is very important to have experienced members on a planning
City Administrator Wolfc reviewed the suggested steps to be implemented by the City council
pcrtaining to when a task force is formed. The goal is to have a consistent approach in the
formation of task forccs. It is proposed that at a future work sessions, thc City Council would
discuss and review the purpose of a task force, work plans, and time lines. Prospective members
of a task force will be asked to complete a committec application form.
City Administrator Wolfe said that the implementation of term limits will have to be a policy
issue decided by the City Council in rcgards to committee and commissions.
Mayor Aplikowski stated that term limits minimizes personal ownership and allows more
opportunities for others to participate on commissions, committees, and task forces.
This item will be placed on a future work session agenda for further discussion.
Northwest Areas Librarv Access Task Force
City Administrator Wolfe stated that the Ramsey County Library Board has created a Northwest
Area Library Task Force to study and evaluate library services in the northwest portion of the
county. The City has bccn asked to appoint an elected official and a citizen representativc to thc
task force.
Councilmcmber Holden said that shc believes that Ramsey County Library Board leans toward
larger library branches. The current Arden Hills is very restrictive with its building and location.
Also, the library is only open certain times of the day and this forces people to visit the Roseville
or Shorcview branches.
Mayor Aplikowski mentioncd that she has received mixed messages from residents regarding thc
nccd for a larger library, while some residents want to keep our existing library opcn.
8
e
e
e
,'.
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION MINUTES
June 20, 2005
9
City Administrator Wolfe said that an appointment to the Northwest Arcas Library Access Task
Force should be made at the ncxt City Council meeting.
Mayor Aplikowski asked the City Councilmembcrs if they would continue to fight to keep thc
existing library opcn in Arden Hills.
Councilmember Larson noted thc concern that the current building is small and lacks visibility in
the public.
City Council will make two appointmcnls to the Northwest Area Library Acccss Task Force at
the June 27'h meeting.
Council Reports
Brenda Holden
· Councilmember Holden asked City staffifthcrc wcre problems with the proposed land
purchase at the International Paper Company for a storm water holding pond.
. City Administrator Wolfe rcported that staff has been working with Intcrnational Paper
and that URS has created an aItcrnative plan for the pond that does not rcquirc as much
land acquisition. City Administrator Wolfe will check on these conccrns and report back
to the City Council.
· Councilmember Holden asked if the City Councilmembers remaining Celebrate Arden
Hills tickets should be returned to Recreation Supervisor Michelle Olson.
. City Administrator said that the rcmaining tickets should be returned to Michellc Olson.
She also notcd that the City has alrcady surpassed its sponsorship totals from last year.
Gregg Larson
· Councilmembcr Larson inquired about thc after hours lighting issues at the Mounds Vicw
High School athletic fields.
. City Administrator W olfc reported that staff has discussed this issue with the school
district and that they will work to ensure that the lights are shut off by 10:00 PM.
· Councilmembcr Larson will not be ablc to attend this year's Celebrate Arden Hills event
due to a prior cngagement.
Beverly Aplikowski
· Mayor Aplikowski reported that she has art tickets available for anyone that is interested.
9
e
e
e
'. . ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION MINUTES
June 20, 2005
10
The meeting adjourned at 9:1S PM
Respectfully submitted by Schawn P. Johnson
Beverly Aplikowski, MAYOR
Michelle A. Wolfe, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
10
~
~HILLS
City at Arden Hills
Re uest for Council Action
Prepared by: Murtuza Siddiqui ~~
Dept.: Finance
Council Mtg. Date: July 11, 2005
Final Action Needed By: 7/11/2005
Council Action Request:
Review and Approve Consent Agenda Item 3.A. - Claims and Payroll
Staff Recommendation:
Approve Consent Agenda Item 3.A. - Claims and Payroll
Advisory Commission Action:
Commission
Date
Planning
PTRC
. Supporting Documents (which are attached to this Action Form):
D Memo/Letter:
D Resolution (No. )
D Ordinance (No. )
D Engineering Recommendation:
D Attorney Recommendation:
DOther:
Payroll and Claims Reports
Financial Implications:
Payroll #12 Total Cost $59,612.92
Payroll #13 Total Cost $72,236.15
Claims Total $156,200,77
Administrator/Staff Comments:
.
Agenda Item
Claims & Pavroll
Budgeted Amount:
Actual Amount:
Funding Source:
Action
Not Applicable
, , , ,. , ,j\Jotp,llplicalJle
_N_o\..ll(l[llicable
Page 1 of 1
-
.
.
.
N
'li
'"
~
b 8 8 " ~ :ir.
~ 0 a g ~ :a
II ~ :~
g
. ~ " ~ .:.0
"
~ 0 , ~ ~ 'Q
.
0 .~
.; M ~ ::~
.~
.
I
c a :jj
~
~ ~ "6 :.~
0 ~ .:;.:i
~ < < ..
~ b ~ u ..
~ ~ ~ ~
wa . . . .
~
.,
~
;;;
o
C
W
I-
<(
C
"
'"
o
W
I
o
to
-'.,
50
o:::5i
>9
<(~
0."
w~
z;;;
:::>0
-'';'
......
"'.
f!:~
LL!!
o 0
t t
"
~~
f~
80, ~ ~ 8g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Og' ~ ~ ~ ~ <:> 0 ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~
. N
. ,
~ ~
a 0 0 0 c
0 0 0 0 ",Q,
0 a 0 0 .0
a a g ~ 0
0 .~
.; ~ ~ ~ ::::
~
-
"
,
] ~ :~
g g ~ , :.:~
" " , u :::~
l , 0 :>~
~ u
" " ;<; 1 :::~
~ ~ .. "
~ ~ 0
< < < <
~ ~ ~ " ..~
~ ~ ~ ~
12 t ti
~ ~ ~
,
~
~
ill
g
~
~~~og~g;~~
v ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
;;, "'". 8 H ,. '"
~:Z.~:Z:2 ....gg~ggg
_ _ ~ : ~ ~ : ~ ~ ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ & ~ i _
'"
-'
-'
:;:
Z
w
a
'"
<(
u.
o
~
ij
o
~
~
~
~..~
~ ~.,
-51 ~ ffi ] ~
~. I/:J ~I ~ <J ,
.~ ~I ~- ~ :
r:l ~ ..s ~ <i ~
6:Q~~~~
o
"
o
~ ~ 11,.1 ~
] ~I ~ ~
Vlli '" 2
;; a ~ ~
,
~
,
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ a 8 8 8 5
~~~~~~g g ~'!'!'!'~'!
~ ] ] ~ ] ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
.1 .~ ,~ .~ .~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~,~:~: ~
v ~. ~. w ~. ~, ~, N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
. ~ 8 .-
N (i
. 0
. .
N
. 0 ~
. . .:~
, ~ .
N ~
N - .~
0 .'
0
.,
~ g
~
5
~ E
0 i
0
.~ ..
~ :=
il ~ l ....,.
:::~
~ ~ u
gg~g~gg~
~ C <:> ~
. 0
[;; 8 8 g
:: ~ ~ ~
N
'" g :1; ~
,
v <:> ~
"
o
~ '
~ ~
~ "
008
t: t: :
"
. 0
Ii: 12 t
. ~
_ - :I::I:-
"'" ~ '" N ~ ::::;
~ ~
~
g g
o .,.;
~ ~
~ ~ :2
... ~ ~
<.l '" '" 8 2
:a ~ .Q ; ! -0
.e ":; ~ &:1 tl ~ <: J:
~ ~ ~ ]11 ~ ~ ~ J
] € ~
Ci ~ ..-:
~ c , ~ 8 :::1;
, ~ N
$ ~ 0 . ~ " .,'"
~ :.'"
;; 0 C N ~ '"
M :.'"
0
0 ':'f;;:
li
~ Ii ~ ...~
Q . ~ ~ i
~
f '~ ~ ~
~ '0
f ~ ~ ','<C
E 0 ~ .~
~ " :.;;1
. ~ i! -< i
~ " $ 0 ~
~ z is "
;:; ::r
~ ~
~I f
" ~
~ ~
] 1 i I ~I jij ] ~
Cl p::: Z .>:. ...., ~ i
~ 'F: ~I r JI? ~ 0
~ ~ ~ ~Ii: ~ :i: a
1 .g .,
~ ~ ~
] .gl ~
~ ..g 8
~
g g g g 8 8 8 8 8 g 8 g 8 8 ,.
o 0
o 0
o 0'. 0 - ,..., ...
.~
] ::~
A~
.",
-..l :q
'!>i
0-.0 :.;.::
~ E 8 8 N:~
..~.
N 0
o _
~ ~ g ~ , ~
. ~ M i g ~
0 :1 . . ,
of ~ M
-<
~ < ~
"
~ " ~ .
~
0 ~ ;;
j~: < . ~ ~
~ ~ .
:.6- ~ ~ ~ '6
~ - 0
.~ . ~ ~
~ , ~
...~ ~ ~ ~ < <
$ , , ~ " ~
~ " ~ ~
8. ~
~ :;
..... ~ ::J ::rOE
~~~~.~:
~.
':~
"
o
'0
..s
] ~ a
~ ~I [^
~ d :f:
~ ~
E ~ -0.
E c> e
i ~ ;
~ 8" ~
0.1;1 !
"
.~ ~
~ s]
f- 1il ~
"2 'B ...,
;.' f E
. ~
~ .s ]
-g ~ ~
l j ;
~ c ~
;:
z
<=;
~
"
'"
if.
0 0 . I:'
E 0 0 ~ ,:,.
~ 0 0 ~ S:r:~
~
" 'I;;.
g ~
. ~ ~ ~ .'"il.
~ ~ , . ~ 'On
- g .'~
.
-:-:- ... N - ,::$
~
C
"
~ "Ii
~
~ ] ~ ..
- 0 ~ _:_~
~ < < ...
to ~ " " '-I-"
0
" " " .'~
W.
~...,.. . . .
........~
~
'"
;:0
o
C
w
..
..
"
'"
"
()
W
I
()
-!~
O~
"'"
,.."
<'"
a.'"
,..::
-'''
::>0
-'"
......
"'.
Q:; 3
I.L~
if.
'"
.~
j
"
3
o 0
" "
. .
~ :E
" N
i~
::;:($
.W
.':.=:;
g -<> g g:~
N 0 0 ::~
I~
~
o :=.6 g :!::::;!j
:~~~::~
:.!:'!
~
,
~ ~ 1 ~f{t
.~ ' . -It
i ] J'!!f
~ ~ ~ ~(:r
o
~
.
~
]
~
.
0;;:;
t .!i
~ ~
..... 0
~ E-
~ .
~ ~
g $ g g ~ g : ~ ~
g N g g N 0 ~ N N
~ " 0 .t
0
- 0 '.1.
. " ..
N :''':''.
" ~ .'"
~ ~ ~ :'>~
. .:;
N - ::~
"
0
~ ..);:
g ."
" !
,
.~ ...~
.
il ~ 1 '-:~
"~
" "0
. U -:""
~ :f
- ~
~ g g
o . N
gg~gggg
N",,,,g~go
~
w
z
g 8 :5 8 g g g g g g g
000 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8 8 8
o 0 0
i
\I
o 0 ~ g g g g ~ ~ ~
= : ~ ~ : 0 : : ~ 3
'"
-'
-'
'i:
z
UJ
o
'"
"
u.
o
~
U
~
"
<-
,.
~
,
~I ~
.
~
w
~'.."..'...',".'
",-0
:v.~
~
888 g g g g g g g g g 8 g N
~
" . -
8 . if
'" ~ 5
a 2 g
u :B ~
~ ~ ~ : ~ ~ ; ; ~ ~ ~ : : : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ : i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;:~
-':-:'
:N
~
.'"
N>'
....
-;;r.
'.~
o 0
~ N
,..; .....;
f} ~
0 0 ~ g ~ 8 g ~
0 0
0 0 N 0 ~ 0 0 5
~ g g 0 . 0 " <
0 0 . 0
~ ~ cO ~ .,; 0 ..
0 ~ .
M -
~I "'
u "
0 , >
]1 ~ I ~ .
! Ii <
~ " "
. , , ~ el i, z
0 0
. ~ 5 .. -
~ S ~ .." " ~ 0
. ~ ,
.~ ~ ~ u " -
~ il ~ u <
~ 0 ~ e ~ 6
" ~ ~ 0 " " "
g $ S ~ ofp
0 N . ~ ~ ~I~
N - 0
;; N g ~ ..
',""
" ~I!
0
0
0 0 ~
~ q
r 1 ~ ~rb
~ ~ ~ <:; "'Il:
f ~ ~ :::~
& ~ 1:1. IIlr:-
.. ~ 0 u ~.;!
0 ~ 8 ~ 0 s;:-:-O
~ ~
,
.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .
. 0 0
~ ~ " " " ~
. ~ ~
~ N ~
a < ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ i g ~ I@
II ] l~ !
.. .. - ~ . ~
~ " , ~ 15 ~
" ~
rt . . ~ < <
<5 3 ~ ~ 8 "
~ ~
.
g g N ~ g ~ 8 ~
~ g ~ ~ N N ~ g ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ g g g g g g ~; ~ ~ ~ g ~ g ~ ~ ; ~
~ s ~ : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ N ~
o 0
~ ~
, M
I
.
~ e 2
o ~ ~
_""_ ' ~o
..cl'! 1;;.~ ::~
:2 ~ 'uE ~ :~ .-...
.....,.;.
III 5 ~ j(:g
ro:l 6 ~ ~ ~ ::~
:1lI:<
:...
N ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ 0 . ~ . ~ . ~ ~ ~ 0 g t
----=------ -=--~-- -----=-::.:~
"
u
~
~
8l'i<>t2~O
~ ij: r;: "'" =- =-
'" ~ !:2 ~ '"
~ ~ ;. ~ ~
:E :E
o
c C5
~ g ~
N M .
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ N ~ ~
888
~ ~ 2
" ~
.'-l ~ ~ ~
.~ . 0 0 ]
'" '3 ~ ~ ~ ]
~~~~~~v
..: ~ ~ ;:;;, ;:g "" ~
~
~
~I ,
~I ~
'" 't:
, ~
~ ..
.~ ] ~
o ~ i.
.~. ~ :;; ] 'c ~.: ij
v-:<:i';aodfj~]D
~uv -'llJUe
~ ~ .~ .~ ~ ~
~ 0 ~ ~ 0 6
<:i "2
~ .:=.
~ ]
o 0
o 0
~ ~ ~ ~
8 8 8
I ~ e
..1 ~ :s
~ ~
~ 1;!
~ ~
~ g
~ ~
~I r
, ,
" ~
.
.
.
.
PAGE10F4
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CLAIMS REPORT
TO BE APPROVED AT 07/11/05 COUNOL MEETING
CLAIMS PAID SINCE LAST COUNCIL MEETING ((16/27/05)
:; :;:t't.:~: ~:: ::rn:6AtEj:: >i'~i<Pi>iii-' . ....;.:.;.:.;.:.:-:.;.:.;.;.:.::::.,::::,:: ::::~MOk3Nt.: ~ :::~i\tl\1iN1g::::;"
26918 06/21105 M~t"Vland Screen Printers 115.95 I.Shirts for Team Tennis
26920 06/22/05 ArnericaIla Fireworks Disnlav Co 7500.00 Fireworks Disvlav for CAB 2005
26921 06/22/05 Animals ofWal1ons Hollow 1240.00 Final nvrni for Pettin" ZooJ Pony Rides CAB
26922 06122/05 Hannv Faces Entertaimnent 865.00 Caricaturists! Face PaintimdCloWII eAH
26923 06/22/05 Mad Science of Minnesota 235.00 Mad Science Presentation CAH
26924 06/22/05 Ma<>ic Bounce lne 575.00 Rock Climbinl!: Wall for CAH - Final Dvm!
26925 06/22/05 MRPA 280.00 State Softball Toumament~ Mixed, Men's
26926 06/22/05 Pel"h.'Cash 200.00 Cash for Celebratinl! AH
26927 06/22/05 Prior Lake Water Ski Assoc 800.00 Final Pvmt for Water Ski Show - CAB
26928 06/22/05 Ramsev Co Parks & Recreation 190.00 Kev Denosit for Tonv Sclunidt Countv Park CAH
26929 06/22/05 Shoreview Northern Li"hts Variet" Band 500.00 Band for Celebratin" AH
26930 06/22/05 The \VhitesidewaUs 2500.00 Band for Celebratin" AH
26931 06/22/05 Twin Ci'" Calerin" Tnc 6268.95 Food & Children's ActiVities - CAB
26932 06/22/05 FOITestWickl11nd 140.00 Food counans for Volunteers/Staff. CAH
26933 06123/05 Christo"'herDiemer 50_79 Sunn!ies for CAB - Soan, bucket, towels, MP water
26934 Stan Pa 'Tneflt . void I
26935 Stan Pavrnent - void I
Subtotal - Paid Claims 21460.69
b"
Paid Claims -
55.372.2&
Add Unpaid Claims,
100&2&.49
T{)tal Accounts Payable Claims
for Council Appronl, 07111105.
.
156,200.77
Note Checks for unpaid claims totaling StOO,828.49 tD be mailed July 12,200 5
aftcrapplovalallheJulyll,2005CouneilMeeting
"Exp_ Re13ted 10 TeAM Project
......_,,""""'~',\,;"','
}>AGE20F4
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CLAIMS REPORT
TO BE APPROVED AT 07/11/05 COUNCIL MEETING
.
PAID CLAIMS REGISTER:
:~:: !b.ii.!~!~::I:!miiAh):~::v.~~j)M!: .................................................1..................1. ;~O~~iS!~::::..
....'.,.,......................................................"MQ"""'.....
26936 06/29/05 A & L Sn""rior flnaJihl Sod 405.45 Sod -Rcnair at 3806 New Bri"htonRd
26937 06/29/05 A-IContractCleaninrr Ine l315.28 CHCleanine
26938 06/29/05 Accurate Press Ine 137.39 P~lino - 500 - Insnec!ion Reeord
26939 06/29/05 AlIetmll Print & hna"ill" 609.38 AHNewsletter
26940 06/29/05 Ararnark Unifonn Service 42.IS CH - RUI!: C1enain"
26941 06129/05 Beisswenoer's How-To-Store Il.lS Tri"per - Sthil Trimmer, PVC 2x3 Galv N
26942 06129/05 BiII'sRcntalCentcr 393.5S 8HP Tiller Relltal - 5/19 & 5124
26943 06/29105 Brock \Vhitc Comnanv 2,915.86 Roadsaver 22! 30#
26944 06/29/05 B'."an Rock Products Inc 465.90 Red Ball Diamond AGG
26945 06129/05 Dem.ofAdmill..istratioll 979.10 PboneService
26946 06/29/05 Disnla" Sales Co. 170.93 2US&2MNFlal!S
26947 06129/05 Fortis Benefits 243.00 SbortTennDisabilitv.Julv
26948 06129/05 Fra-Dor Black Dirt & Recvcle 41.54 Black Dirt - Watennain Reoair
26949 06/29/05 Fratulllone's Hardware Inc. 34.80 Black naint, wood "lue, nlu". fastners, tane. dnun 1m
26950 06/29/05 lIar Mar Lock & Service Center 18".1l Ke's(lO)GBldQ
26951 06/29/05 H"dro Meterinn- Teebuolo"" 1.584.91 Water Meters
26952 06/29105 IdealAdvertisinj>.lnc 730.00 T-Shirts {I 00\ & Screen Printilll!
26953 06/29/05 Ikon Office Solutions 148_02 CaJUlollStanles
26954 06/29/05 Kath Auto Parts 848.63 V,lX Filter, hold do.....nkit. 3 ton Jack, mini lamns, s
26955 06/29105 Klamm. Mechanical Contractors 4713.00 PVC, fittinO's. eon.material, nlWllb.labor Onerator H
26956 06n9l05 Labor Abritration Institute 225.00 Rc". for Labor Law &. Labor Arb. Class - S. Johnson
26957 06/29/05 Lillie Suburban Newsna.....rs 579.30 8850 Fivers and Inserts - CAH
26958 06/29/05 LTG Powe~uinment 121.14 Olatbe Tires #5412
26959 06/29/05 John Mermenaa 10.00 Llmcheon Seminar - NW Bid". Insn.
26960 06/29/05 :M.idwest Asnhalt Com. 558.96 Road Renair Material
26961 06/29105 Minnesota Mutual Life 309,05 Life Insurance
26962 06/29/05 l\1innesota Wanner Comnanv 100.32 fluad KitVIT #20407 20403 20404
26963 06/29/05 MN NCPERS Life Insurance 76.00 PERA
26964 06/29/05 Vau9hnMorin 38.25 Reimb. - Ovemvm[ WaleI' i.JW05-0l2
26965 06/29/05 WI Distribution- Co. 24558 Micro Switch Ball Bearinas ASM Switch
26966 06/29/05 Muska Electric Co. 151.50 Reimb for Electric Permit #E05-] 10
26967 06129/05 Nelson Cheese Factor" 344.92 Business LW1Cb - Citv Business
26968 06/29/05 RelJanNeururer 39.00 Reinlb - Co-Rcc Swruner Souirts Soccer
26969 06/29/05 Ne:del Communications 676.07 Cell Phone Serviee
Paid Claims - Pa"e 2 19289,24
en
tra
.
001<
.
.
.
.
PAGE30F4
CITY OF ARDEN HILlS
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CLAIMS REPORT
TO BE APPROVED AT 07/11105 COUNCIL MEETING
PAm CLAIMS REGISTE:R :
',::cit;i{::" .:~j(;:tiA.ri(: ,;,YE;NI}M=:: :':::':::::':::::':':::::::::';::::::::::::::::::: :',=iMOO8T,': :',:COMMtNts>
26970 06/29/05 M""'Nosek 105.00 June Newsletter
26971 06/29/05 Olde Town Deli 62.21 CC Worksession 6120/05
26972 06/29/05 Or-iental Tradinl! Co. In, 214.50 PlavarOWld Sunnlie!> & $no11S Elluinmenl
26973 06/29/05 Pace AnalvticaI 718.63 WaterTestin"~Jlll1e
26974 06/29/05 PitnevPowes 147.23 Red Ink Cartrid"e - Posta"c Meter
26975 06/29105 Ramsev Countv 2,06155 Disposal of Tires Fuel Purchases
26976 06129/05 Roseville,Citvof 382.10 lTP Services - June 2005
26977 06/29105 John Shields 360.07 Refimd Bldfr. Permit #B05-9175
26978 06/29/05 SiPll-A-Rama 447.16 CAB. Si"ns - Final p.-t
26979 06/29/05 S"ortsUnlimiled 416.00 LacrosseCamn
269KO 06/29/05 Snnuli:brook Software 2,208.33 Bad er Meter Interface & Maint 71l-I2J3lJOj
2698] 06/29/05 Sl. Josenh's Er. uimneot Inc. 123.87 Parts-Tubes.
26982 06/29/05 Tessman Seed Co.-Sf. Paul 379.99 Twface ("lnick D'"'' 50#
26983 06/29/05 Tru"reen-ChemlaWIJ 303.53 Weed Control - Lind" Park
26984 06/29/05 United Rentals 38.57 CAH - Tane - Dan"e! Camlon Barricade
26985 06/29/05 WeslWeld 329.66 Sho Sunnlies - HHCS washers bolls, oms, ties, lub
26986 06/29/05 DavidMWllkel 44.99 Uniform Purchase
26987 06/29/05 Zamuth Brush Works Inc 668.61 Elec nol" 24~ Wafer Broom
26988 06/29/05 TrulJTeen~CbemlaWD 240.69 Weed Control. Arden Oaks Park
26989 06/30/05 Affinity Plus Fed Credit Union 3038.98 IsI July 2005 Pa~TOIl
26990 06/30/05 leMA Retirement Trust-457 1960.04 1 st PavroU Julv 2005
26991 06/30/05 .Mn Child Suooort Pavment Ctr. 370.64 IstPavrollJuI"2005
Paid Clairns-Paoe 3 ]4622.35
n<
PAGE40F4
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CLAIMS REPORT
TO BE APPROVED A T07/1II05 COUNCIL MEETING
UNPAID CLAIMS REGISTER:
._---....
::Hiiiii/ ~~~~~tJ;
26992
26993
26994
07/12105
07/12105
07/12/05
Aacree P & Tent Rental
Lakes Coun Service Coo
Ramse COWlt
Un aid Claims - Pa e 4
.
......-.....,........
<.\~oiliitt:~:
8 ]05.99 CAH Tables chairs c.mo ies
8700.00 Insurance - Au
Law Enforcement - Jul, Data Processing, 3005
84022.50 MaintFees
100828.49
.
.
.
Prepared by: TM
Dept.: Admin
Council Mtg. Date: 7/8/2005
Final Action Needed By: 7/8/2005
~
~~HILLS
City of ArdenlIills
Request for Council Action
Agenda Item 3.B
Resolution No. 05-44: Approvinq the Application for the new Use of Tax
Forfeited land at the intersection of Amble Road and Dellwood Street
Budgeted Amount N/A
Actual Amount: $26.00
Funding Source: General Fund
Council Action Request:
City Council approval of Resolution No. 05-44 and the submittal of the Application for Approval of a New
Use of Tax Forfeited lands at a cost not to exceed $26.00.
Staff Recommendation:
Approval of Resolution No. 05-44
Advisory Commission Action:
Commission
Planning
PTRC
Date
.Supporting Documents (which are attached to this Action Form):
i:i<:] Memo/Letter:
[8J Resolution (No. 05.44)
o Ordinance (No
o Engineering Recommendation:
o Attorney Recommendation:
o Other:
Financial Implications:
The application fee of $26.00 will come from the General Fund.
Administrator/Staff Comments:
.
Action
Not Applicable
.Not Applicable
Not applicable
Page 1 of 1
.
.
.
~
/f'\~HILLS
City of Arden Hills
Ramsey County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION NO. 05-44
A RESOLUTION
RELATING TO THE CLASSIFICATION OF TAX FORFEITED PROI'ERTY
WHEREAS, on September 22, 1978, the City of Arden HIlls acquired the following
described tax forfeited parcel from the State of Minnesota:
Subject to road and easements; except the east 110 feet and except the west 110 feet, Lot
4, Borstead, Ramsey County (PIN: 22-30-23-13-00047-A)
(the "Tax Forfeited parcel"); and
\VHEREAS, the deed of conveyance from the State of Minnesota stated lhatthe Tax
Forfeited parcel was to be used exclusively for future road right-of-way; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined by a review of the records of Ramsey County and by
site review of the Tax Forfeited Parcel that the easterly 60 feet is being used for road right-ot~way
and that the westerly 50.03 feet was being used for storm water ponding and drainage: and
WHEREAS, the City of Arden llills wishes to correct the Ramsey County records to
rellect the actual uses of the Tax Forfeited Parcd; and
WHEREAS, the City of Arden Hills is advised that the procedure for correcting the
Ramsey County records is to file an "Application for Approval of a New Use for Tax-Forfeited
Lands" (the Application for Approval).
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED: that the Arden Hills City
Council hereby directs the City Administrator to file the appropriate Application for Approval,
indicating that the easterly 60 feet of the Tax Forfeited parcellS bemg used for road right-ot~way
and that the westerly 50.03 feet of the Tax Forfeited Parcel is being used for storm water pondmg
and drainage.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS THIS 11th
DAY OF JULY, 2005.
ATTEST:
Beverly Aplikowski, MAYOR
Michelle A. Wolfe.. CITY ADMINISTRATOR
.
.
.
~
/f\~HILLS
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
July 8, 2005
Agenda Item 3.B
TO:
Mayor and Council
Michelle Wolfe, City Administrator
Thomas J. Moore, Director of Operations & Maintenance~ J~ ~
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 05-44; Approving the Application for the New Use of Tax
Forfeited Land at the Intersection of Amble Road & Dellwood Street
FROM:
BACKGROUND
The City of Arden Hills received a notice from the Minnesota Department of Revenue that the
parcel of land located at the northwest corner of the intcrscction of Amble Road and Dell wood
Street (lot 4, Borstad, Ramsey County, Minnesota) was incorrectly designated as future road
right-ofway. This designation took place during the development of the neighborhood. Over
timc, this parcel becamc a storn1 water pond. The correct designation should be a combination of
road right-of-way and ponding/drainage. The rc-designation of a parcel can be accomplished by
a City Resolution and an Application for Approval of a New Use of Tax-Forfeited Lands.
COST
The cost ofthe Application for Approval of a New Use of Tax-Forfeitcd Lands is $26.00. Funds
. are to come out of the Gencral Fund.
REOUESTED COUNCIL ACTION
City Council approval of Resolution No. 05-44 and the submittal of the Application for Approval
of a New Use of Tax Forfcited Lands at a cost not to exceed $26.00.
\\Earth\pr&pw\Operations & Malntenance\Storm\Arnble Dellview Rerlesignation..doc
o
CD
II
=
~
Qi
<1l
o
(/)
o
~
'"
o
o
N
!~iU3H
~:; i: g.)~: ~
mum
;.~i~&~a
;,;:.
,3,.,'0"
Illmlli
Humu
, d~~~ni
~
OJ
2
.0
Q)
u..
0-
m
;;;;
Q)
~
<II
~
G
>-
C
=>
o
o
>-
<D
"'
E
,2
a;
U
~
~
o
III
U)
::3
~ffi \ _
~"';;.<^
rT1 3~.0;:; ~
~ ~JI~~
l)~~"' I"
-<
~
.
PT Form 961 (Revised 9/23/96)
l\:linncsota Department of Revenue
Application for Approval of a New IJse of Tax-Forfeited Lands
(lVIinnesota Statutes, Section 282.01, Subdivisions la througb Ie)
In
RAMSEY
County
Name n( governmental s1Ibdivision (applicmll)
City of ArdenHills
Mailing address olappheam.
1245 Highway 96 W
Arden Hills, Ml'l 55112-5400
State deed number OJ5584J_
Dale starc deed ismed:
SeDtember
(monrh)
2}nd
(day)
1978
(year)
Legal description of property (include the name of the city/town if! which the property is focawd):
Subject to lO<ld and easements; except the East 110 teet and except the West 110 feet Lot 4, Borstau, Ramsey County, Minnesota.
P[\;: 22-30-23 13-0047 (A)
CONTRACT:
Describe the intended public use for which the property \\<15 previously conveyed (be ~pccific, including statute or special law
reference_, iCrde\.am)
.
future road n!!ht-o(-wav
Describe the new public use for the property that is being requested (be specific, induding stature or speeialla\.... reterences, if
relevant).
The Bast 60 feet (or road right-of--::\vav and the West 50.03 feet [ofponding and drain_age
THlS rNSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED fiY:
Jerome P. Filla, ~e_~erson. Fram be Bergman. P~.
Name
50 E. 5th Street. Suite 300, St. Paul, MN 55101
-----
Address
STATE OF MI1\'NESOT A
)
h
)
County of RAMSEY
Mich(d_)~Ji...olfe. C~.!..LJ~:dmini_~tr2torbeing first duly sworn, deposes and say:> that he/she is the 3utllOrized
repre:>cntative of the gov(~mmenta! subdivision (applicant) lwrned herein, Ihal he/she has read :>aid application and knows the rontellts
thereof, and that the matters stated therein are true and correct
Title
City Administr2t(
Name Michelle Holfe
Subscribed and sworn to before me this
davof
20
:\'Olary Public, __
_ County, i\-1u1J1.
.
My conmlissioll cxpin:s
Rt'turn applica!iGIl tG: 1\1N DepartlUl'nl of H.cyenlJl.'. }l..-operty Tax Division. M3il Station 3340. Sc raul, MN 55146-3340
.
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY BOARD UPON APPLICATION
The County Board of
_ County, Minnesota, hilS reviem::d the application
of
__ __ _ dated_
_, 20___, for the approval ora ne\~
imthoru.:cd public USe of certain lax-fOffeil<~d land described therein. The county board recommends that this application be:
rejected
grantd
Date
Signature (for the County Board)
OFFICE OF TIlE COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE
St_ Paul, MinrL,
.:W
Upon due consideration of this application, it is ordered that if is hereby' rejected
granted~
STATE OF MINNESOTA
CciiTiritis'Sloner of Revenue
.
By__
Undo>.r ddegatiQll pursuant 10 MinIlf.:sota Statutes. S.ection 27002.
Subdivision 2
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)S5.
County of Ramsey )
Onlhis
dayof
before me personaUy appeared
the duly appointed representative Df the Commissioner of Revenue of the Stale of
Minnesota, (0 me known to be the person who executed the foregoing conveyance in behalf of the state of Minnesota and
acklJO\vledged (hat he executed the same as the free act and deed of said sote pursuant 10 the statutes in such case made and provided
Notary Public
.
~.
( , '~-'
~
~HILLS
City ot Arden Hills
Request for Council Action
Agenda Item Iffl
PC #05-12 Master and Final PUD and Preliminary Plat for Roval Oaks
ReallY /to redevelop the old City Hall/PW site on HiQhwav 96)
Budgeted Amount: $0.00
Actual Amount: $0.00
Funding Source. N/A
. Prepared by: PH
Dept.: Com. Dev.
Council Mtg. Date: 7/11/2005
Final Action Needed By.
7/15/2005
Council Action Request:
. Consider Resolution No. 05-45 which would approve a Master and Final Planned Unit Development and
Preliminary Plat for Royal Oaks Realty to redevelop the former City Hall and Public Works site on
Highway 96.
. Consider the Planned Unit Development Permit No. 05-12
Staff Recommendation:
. Approve Resolution No. 05-45 which would approve a Master and Final Planned Unit Development and
Preliminary Plat for Royal Oaks Realty to redevelop the former City Hall and Public Works site on
Highway 96.
. Approve the Planned Unit Development Permit No. 05-12
Advisory Commission Action:
.
Commission
.F'lanning
PTRC
Date
7/6{2005 ,
Action
,
-------~--
i
... ..... .........l\l'prCly"dJ6=1)...
u__No!l\ppli<:<lble__
Not applicable
-t---
Supporting Documents (which are attached to this Action Form):
[2] Memo/Letter:
- Staff Report to the City Council - July 11, 2005
[2] Resolution (No. 05-45)
D Ordinance (No.
D Engineering Recommendation:
D Attorney Recommendation:
[2] Other:
- Planned Unit Development Permit No. 05-12
Financial Implications:
Administrator/Staff Comments:
.
Page 1 of 1
, ,
~'
.
~
~HILLS
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
July II, 2005
Agenda Item 6.A
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Peter HeIlegers, City Planner
SUBJECT: PC #05-12; Royal Oaks Realty, Inc.
Master and Final Plan PUD and Preliminary Plat for the Old City Hall / PW site
1440-1450 W. Highway 96 "Arden Hills Office Park"
Requested Action
· Consider the attached Resolution #05-45 which would approve the requested Master and
Final PUD and Preliminary Plat for the redevelopment of the old City Hall/Public
Works property as a 7 building, 30 unit, office condominium complex by Royal Oaks
Realty.
. . Consider the attached Planned Unit Development Permit No. 05-12.
Planninl! Commission Recommendation
At their July 6,2005 meeting the Planning Commission reviewed Planning Case #05-12 and
recommended approval (6-1) of the Planned Unit Development and Preliminary Plat for Royal
Oaks Realty subject to the following eighteen (18) conditions:
I. Revised Final Plans. The applicant shall submit revised plans, responsive to the
comments from the Plan Review Comments contained in City Planning File #05-12 for
review and approval by the City Planner, City Engineer, and City Building Official, prior
to issuance of building permits.
2. Development Timeline. The applicant's timeline for development shall be as follows:
a. Phase I: Summer 2005 - The developer may begin grading, installing utilities,
and construction of storm water improvcmcnts. It is expected that construction on
3 buildings/16 units (presumably units 15-30), will also begin at this time. The 3
buildings/16 units are expected to be ready for occupancy by the Spring of 2006.
b. Phase 2: Summer 2006 - The developer expects to begin construction on the
remaining 4 buildings/14 units (presumably 1-14) with expected occupancy of
these units by the spring of 2007.
.
\\Earth\Planning\Planning Cases\2005\05- ] 2 Arden Hills Office Park - Royal Oaks Really - pun, Preliminary Plat for Old City HaJJ & PW Site
(PENDING)\07-11-05 CC Report OS-12.doc
Page 1 of3
I
Extensions beyond 2007 shall require application to the City Council for review and
approval. At the time of application for extensions, the City Council may include such
conditions of approval as they determine necessary for compliance with City Code.
3. Number of Businesses in a Unit. 30 office condominium uses have been proposed for
development on individual lots. Only one business shall be permitted to occupy anyone
lot within the development.
4. Retail Uses. Retail uses shall not be allowed to occupy any of the units in the proposed
development, except for incidental or accessory sales.
5. Restaurant Uses. Restaurant uses shall not be allowed to occupy any of the units in the
proposed development.
6. Residential Uses. Residential uses shall not be allowed to occupy any of the units in the
proposed development.
7. Landscaping Plans. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan for review and
approval by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. The revised
landscape plan shall include a mixture of coniferous and deciduous trees along the west
buffer yard of the development. The mixture of landscaping shall adequately screen the
development from the residential properties to the west.
8. Tree Preservation. The applicant and their contractors shall work with the City Planner
and City Forester to save as many existing, healthy, and well placed trees as possible in
the areas designated as landscape space.
9. Sign age. One freestanding monument sign at the Highway 96 entrance shall serve for
the development which shall conform to the City's Sign Ordinance restrictions. Wall
signage within the development shall include 30 square feet for each unit in accordance
with the City's Sign Ordinance restrictions. Signage shall be limited to the front of the
building.
10. Screening of Mechanical Operating Equipment. All mechanical operating equipment
shall be screened to meet City regulations.
11. Decorative Fencing to Surround the Pond. Decorative painted fencing (like painted
wrought iron fencing) shall be erected around the pond at the northeast corner of the
property to protect pedestrians from falling into the pond.
12. Execution of a PUD Permit. Execution of a PUD Permit drafted by the City Attorney
and approved by the City Council prior to the issuance of a Building Permit.
13. Park Dedication. Satisfaction of the park dedication requirements as approved by the
City Council in the amount of$40,000.00.
14. Final Plat. The applicant shall submit an application for a Final Plat within six (6)
months following City Council approval of the PUD and Preliminary Plat.
15. Necessary Approvals from Other Agencies. The applicant shall obtairc all necessary
permits from the Rice Creek Watershed District and Ramsey County.
16. Building Setback from City Trail. Units 1,2, and 3 of the proposed development shall
be set back at least 15 feet from the existing trail on the west side ofthe property.
17. Hamline Avenue Entrance. To facilitate movement in and out of the development, a
minimum 30-foot radii shall be built on the northwest and southwest corner of the
intersection. Revised entrance plans shall be submitted to the City Engineer and Ramsey
County Engineer for approval prior to the issuance of the building permits.
\\Earth\Planning\Planning Cases\2005\05- J 2 Arden Hills Office Park Royal Oaks Realty - PUD, Preliminary Plat for Old City Hall & PW Site
(PENDING)\07-1 1-05 CC Report 05-] 2.doc
Page 2 of3
~ ,
. r
.
.
.
.
.
.
{ .
18. Development Impact to City Trail and Lighting of City Trail. During construction of
the development and post construction ofthe development, applicant shall provide plans
to the City Engineer that will show how impact the City trail on the west side of the
development shall be mitigated including a drainage plan to prevent erosion of the trail.
The developer shall provide low-level lighting for the trail behind the buildings subject to
approval by the City Planner.
Deadline for Al!encv Actions - deadline July 15, 2005
The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on May 16, 2005
Pursuant to Minnesota State Statue, the City must act on this request by July 15,2005 (60 days),
unless the city provides the petitioner with written reasons for and additional 60 day review
period. The City may with the petitioners' consent extend the review period beyond the 120
days.
Options
1.
2.
3.
Recommend approval as submitted.
Recommend approval with conditions.
Recommend denial with reasons for denial. If the City denies the petitioners request,
"... it must state in writing the reasons for the denial at the time it denies the request."
Table for additional information.
4.
Attachments
6A-I Resolution 05-45; Approving a Master and Final Planned Unit Development and
Preliminary Plat for Presbyterian Homes
6A-2 PUD Permit No. 05-12
GA-3 Staff Report to the Planning Commission - July 6,2005
6A-4 Planning Commission Minute Excerpt - July 6,2005
6A-5 E-mailed letter from resident Toni Tredal - July 6, 2005
\\Earth\Planning\Planning Cascs\2Q05\OS- 12 Arden Hills Office Park - Royal Oaks Realty - PUD, Preliminary Plat for Old City Hall & PW Site
(PENDING)\07-11-05 CC Report 05-J2.ctoc
Page 3 of3
( r.
.
.
.
City Council Meetiug
July 11, 200S
Attachment 6A - 1
.
.
f ,
~
~HILLS
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. OS-4S
RESOLUTION APPROVING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTAND
PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR ROYAL OAKS REALTY
WHEREAS: on May 16, 2005 Royal Oaks Realty submitted a completed application for
review of a Planned Unit Development and Preliminary Plat which would allow
for the construction of 30 office condos in 7 buildings on the former City Hall and
Public Works Facility site on Highway 96.
WHEREAS: on June 1, 2005, a public hearing was held by the Planning Commission
reviewing the application by Royal Oaks Realty and at the conclusion of the
public hearing the Planning Commission tabled the item to the July 6, 2005
Planning Commission meeting,
WHEREAS: on July 6, 2005, the Planning Commission continued reviewing the
application by Royal Oaks Realty and at the conclusion of the discussion the
Planning Commission recommended approval (6-1) subject to 18 conditions of
approval.
WHEREAS: on July 11, 2005, the City Council received the recommendations of the
Planning Commission.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: That the Council of the City of Arden Hills
approves the Planned Unit Development and Preliminary Plat for Royal Oaks Realty.
dated July 11, 2005.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS THIS 11th
DAY OF JULY, 200S.
Beverly Aplikowski, Mayor
ATTEST:
. Michelle A. Wolfe, City Administrator
r ~ ) _ J
. City Council Meeting
Attachment 6A - 2
.
.
July 11,2005
.
.
.
r .
~ '
DRAFT
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
CASE NO. 05-12
1.0 Recitals.
A.
Royal Oaks Realty, Inc., a Minnesota corporation (the "Permitee")
represents that as of the date of the recording of this Planned Unit
Development Permit ("PUD"). it will be the record fee owner of the
following described property situated in Ramsey County, Minnesota,
to wit (the "Property"):
The Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of
section 22, Township 30, Range 23, Ramsey County,
Minnesota, except the South 3/4ths thereof and
except the east 253 feet thereof
B. The Property is located in an NB (Neighborhood Business) Zoning
District. Offices are allowed in the NB Zoning District.
C. On the 16th day of May. 2005, Permitee submitted a completed
application for review of a planned unit development which would
allow for the construction of thirty (30) office condominiums in seven
(7) buildings on the Property.
D.
At a public hearing on July 6, 2005, the Arden Hills Planning
Commission reviewed the application, the report and
recommendations of the Arden Hills City Planner, the comments
made at the public hearing, and recommended approval of the
PUD subject to certain conditions.
2.0 Approval of PUD. On July 11,2005, the Arden Hills City Council considered
the recommendations of the Arden Hills City Planner and adopted
Resolution No. 05-45 approving the PUD. The approval of the Arden Hills
City is subject to the following conditions:
A. Revised Final Plans. The applicant shall submit revised plans,
responsive to the comments from the Plan Review Comments
contained in City Planning File #05-12 for review and approval by
the City Planner, City Engineer, and City Building Official, prior to
issuance of building permits.
B. Development Timeline. The applicantts timeline for development
shall be as follows:
1.
Phase 1: Summer 2005 - The developer may begin grading,
installing utilities, and construction of storm water
improvements. It is expected that construction on 3
buildings/l6 units (presumably units 15-30), will also begin at
this time. The 3 buildings/16 units are expected to be ready
for occupancy by the Spring of 2006.
2. Phase 2: Summer 2006 - The developer expects to begin
construction on the remaining 4 buildings/14 units (presumably
1-14) with expected occupancy of these units by the spring of
2007.
3. Extensions beyond 2007 shall require application to the City
Council for review and approval. At the time of application
for extensions, the City Council may include such conditions of
approval as they determine necessary for compliance with
City Code.
C. Number of Businesses in a Unit. 30 office condominium uses have
been proposed for development on individual lots. Only one
business shall be permitted to occupy anyone lot within the
development.
D. Retail Uses. Retail uses shall not be allowed to occupy any of the
units in the proposed development. except for incidental or
accessory sales.
E.
Restaurant Uses. Restaurant uses shall not be allowed to occupy
any of the units in the proposed development.
2
_ I , ,
.
.
.
( . 1 ~
.
.
.
F. Residential Uses. Residential uses shall not be allowed to occupy
any of the units in the proposed development.
G. Landscaping Plans. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape
plan for review and approval by the City Planner prior to the
issuance of building permits. The revised landscape plan shall
include a mixture of coniferous and deciduous trees along the west
buffer yard of the development. The mixture of landscaping shall
adequately screen the development from the residential properties
to the west.
H. Tree Preservation. The applicant and their contractors shall work
with the City Planner and City Forester to save as many existing,
healthy, and well placed trees as possible in the areas designated
as landscape space.
I.
Signage. One freestanding monument sign at the Highway 96
entrance shall serve for the development which shall conform to the
City's Sign Ordinance restrictions. Wall signage within lhe
development shall include 30 square feet for each unit in
accordance with the City's Sign Ordinance restrictions. Signage
shall be limited to the front of the building.
J. Screening of Mechanical Operating Equipment. All mechanical
operating equipment shall be screened to meet City regulations.
K. Decorative Fencing to Surround the Pond. Decorative painted
fencing (like painted wrought iron fencing) shall be erected around
the pond at the northeast corner of the Property to protect
pedestrians from falling into the pond.
L. Execution of a PUD Permit. Execution of a PUD Permit drafted by the
City Attorney and approved by the City Council prior to the
issuance of a Building Permit.
M. Park Dedication. Satisfaction of the park dedication requirements
as approved by the City Council in the amount of $40,000.00.
N.
Final Plat. The applicant shall submit an application for a Final Plat
within six (6) months following City Council approval of the PUD and
Preliminary Pial.
O. Necessary Approvals from Other Agencies. The applicanl shall
3
. l
obtain all necessary permits from the Rice Creek Watershed District
and Ramsey County.
.
P. Building Setback from City Trail. Units 1,2, and 3 of the proposed
development shall be set back at least 15 feet from the existing trail
on the west side of the Property.
Q. Hamline Avenue Entrance. To facilitate movement in and out of the
development, a minimum 30-foot radii shall be built on the
northwest and southwest corner of the intersection. Revised
entrance plans shall be submitted to the City Engineer and Ramsey
County Engineer for approval prior to the issuance of the building
permits.
R.
Development Impact to City Trail and Lighting of City Trail. During
construction of the development and post construction of the
development. applicant shall provide plans to the City Engineer that
will show how impact the City trail on the west side of the
development shall be mitigated including a drainage plan to
prevent erosion of the trail. The developer shall provide low-level
lighting for the trail behind the buildings subject to approval by the
City Planner.
.
3.0 Compliance. Permitee hereby agrees to comply with the conditions of
approval for the SUP.
Dated this _ day of July, 2005
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
By:
Beverly Aplikowski
Its: Mayor
ROYAL OAKS REALTY, INC.
By:
Name:
Its:
STATE OF MINNESOTA
.
COUNTY OF
4
.
.
.
, .
On this _ day of , 2005, before me, a notary public within
and for said county, personally appeared Beverly AplikowskL to me known to be
the Mayor of the City of Arden Hills, and she executed the foregoing instrument
and acknowledged that she executed the same by authority of and on behalf
of City of Arden Hills.
Notary Public
5
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF
On this _ day of , 2005, before me, a notary public within
and for said county, personally appeared , to me known to
be the of Royal Oaks Realty, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, and
s/he executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that s/he executed
the same by authority of and on behalf of the corporation.
Notary Public
F:\users\Janice\Jerry\Arden HjIls\Presb Homes SUP .doc
6
. ,
.
.
.
, . ,
. City Council Meeting
Attachment 6A - 3
.
.
July 11, 200S
.
.
.
, .
~
~~HILLS
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
PC Agenda Item 4.A
July 6, 2005
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Peter Hellegers, City Planner
SUBJECT: PC #05-12; Royal Oaks Realty, lnc.
Master and Final Plan PUD and Preliminary Plat for the Old City Hall / PW site
1440-1450 W. Highway 96 "Arden Hills Office Park"
Requested Action
Consider the requested Master and Final PUD and Preliminary Plat for the redevelopment of the
old City Hall / Public Works property as a 7 building, 30 unit, office condominium complex.
Update
The Planning Commission held a public hearing and discussed the applicant's request at their
June I, 2005 meeting. Due to the amount of information, the changes as discussed on the staff
report addendum, and a number of issues raised at the meeting, the Planning Commission
determined that the case should be tabled to the July 6'h meeting.
Site Plan
The applicant has submitted some additional plans to help clarify some of the requests and
addrcss some of the questions of the Planning Commission. Revised plans include a revised site
plan showing the building with units 15-19 shifting ten (10) feet to the west to comply with Rice
Creek Watershed District's requirements. Three parking spaces in this area were removed and
the parking lot light from that parking area has been shifted to the north.
Trail
The existing trail on the west side of the property is now proposed to remain as would the trees
to the west of the trail (with the exception of the box elders). A sidewalk connection to the
property from the City trail, as recommended by staff, has now been included.
Lighting Plan
The lighting plan has also been revised and in now consistent with City Code. The parking lot
light at the south part of the site has been shifted to the north, away from the neighboring
townhome association property.
\\E3rth\Planning\Planning Cases\2005\05-12 Arden Hills Office Park - Royal Oaks Realty. PUD, Preliminary Plat for Old City Hall & PW Site
(PENDINO)\07-06-05 PC Report Royal Oaks 05-12.doc
Page 10/8
, . ,
Building Ex~erior
A revised building rendering has also been included in the revised plans. The rendering shows .
the buildings as discussed at the June I st meeting, mostly brick with hardy board at the gables
and dormers.
Signage
Signage is being proposed to be limited to 30 square feet per unit which would be mounted on
the wall sign band. None of this wall signage would be backlit or internally illuminated. Small
external lights above the signage would illuminate the signs. In addition, each unit would have a
uniform name and address plaque of approximately I square foot next to the entrance door.
Finally, the applicant has requested that the building with nnits 26-30 be allowed to have one
sign of 60 square feet facing Highway 96 (the north side of the building). An elevation has been
included which shows an example of how the 60 square foot sign might look.
Use
The applicant has agreed that residential and restaurant uses not be allowed in the development.
The applicant has also agreed that there will be no retail uses except for incidental/accessory
sales.
Plan Review or anv chanlles since the June 1. 2005 meetinll:
A. Zoning - NB regulations call for developments to be reviewed in spirit and intent of the
Planned Unit Development process.
.
As part of the PUD there are certain things which may not meet some City standards. In the
spirit of the PUD process the applicant may offset some of these deviations from City standard
by including additional elements. Following is a breakdown of the PUD issues.
PUD Chart
Deviations from City standard Additional Elements to Offset Deviations
- Reduced parking setbacks from - A freestanding monument style SIgn
the northern property line. (versus pylon/pole mounted sign).
- One sign that is 60 sf where 30 sf - landscaping approximately double of the
is permitted. City's landscaping standards.
- Wall sign lighting; internal for - Preservation of additional trees along the
the 60 sf sign, external for other west property line (have not been included
wall signage where the standards in the landscaping calculations).
would call for no sign lighting.
- landscape lot area I % less than - Exceptional design and use of superior
the City standard of35%. building materials.
\\Earth\Planning\Planning Cases\2005\05-1 2 Arden Hills Office Park - Royal Oaks Realty - pun, Preliminary Plat for Old City Hall & PW Site .
(PENDfNG)\07-06-05 PC Report Royal Oaks OS-12.doc
Page 20[8
, . ,
.
.
.
The applicant has requested additional signage area, use of a building material which is not
included in the NB District building materials, and reduced parking setbacks along the
northern portion of the site. The applicant has also proposed the following features to offset
some of the aforementioned deficiencies: a monument style freestanding sign, superior
building materials and design for the use, and a landscaping plan with caliper inches of trees
greatly exceeding the requirements.
B. Sign age - One sign of 60 square feet is requested for the Highway 96 side of the building
with units 26-30 which does not meet City standard; unit sign age is proposed with external or
internal lighting which does not meet City standard; meets all other sign standards.
Signage
Type of Sign Sign District 8 Regulations Proposed
Wall Si!mal!e Max Area 30 sf *30 sf/#60 sf
Max Height 14 ft 13ft
Lighting Not permitted Extern al/#In ternal
Freestanding Sign age Max Area 60 sf **50 sf
Max Height 8ft 6ft
(sien and SUPDort)
Lighting External/Internal ***Internal
Auxiliarv Sh~nal!e Wall 6 sf -
Freestanding 6 sf -
Max Height Wall 6ft 1-2 ft/#4 ft
(of Sign Face)
Freestanding 6ft 3.5 ft
* Section 333_9 of the Sign Ordinance: "In multi-tenant buildings or sites the permitted sign area and sign types,
except for permitted freestanding signs. may be installed by each individual business establishment that has
exclusive use of some portion of the street or othenvise primary level of the building and direct access to the
outside. '" - Under the Sign Ordinance all 30 units could each have 30 sf of unlit wall signage.
**The applicant's letter states that they are requesting a sign of 120 square feet which is the total sign mass. The 50
square feet shown above is the area of the sign face, which is what this provision regulates.
***The plans show PIN mounted letters on a metal panel. The assumption is that these are illuminated channel
letters which would be pennitted. The sign ordinance does not allow the face of the sign to be backlit in this sign
district.
#The applicant has requested that the building with units 26-30 (which the entire building will be occupied by one
company) be allowed to have one wall sign on the Highway 96 side (north side) of the building with a 60 square
foot internally illuminated sign. The remainder of the building would he limited to 30 square feet. The total signage
for this particular building would be 90 square feet which is less than the! 50 square feel of total wall signage that
could be there if the building were occupied by 5 separate businesses.
C. Aesthetics/Building Materials - Main building material meets requirement, secondary/trim
materials are not included as permitted exterior materials.
The primary building materials include brick, hardy board, and glass. The trim is a
composite material painted "Manchester Tan". The decorative columns are fiberglass
\\Earth\Planning\Planning Cases\2005\05-J 2 Arden] fills Office Park - Royal Oaks Realty - PUD, Preliminary Plat for Old City Hall & PW Site
(PENDING)\07-06-05 PC RCpOl1 Royal Oaks 05-12.doc
Page 3 of8
, . ,
painted to match the trim. The roof is a "Georgetown Grey" asphalt shingle. Aluminum is
used for the soffits and gutters (painted to match the trim), and a small precast concrete band .
(color Anchor Block: Sahara) is used for the sill. The building materials are consistent on all
four sides of the buildings with the brick extending to just above the doors and windows, just
below the roofline. While not listed as a permitted material, hardy board (a fiber cement
material which has the look of wood but is a maintenance free product like siding) has the
appearar,ce of wood but is much more resilient than wood. Currently the Neighborhood
Business District allows for natural wood products and since the hardy board has the
appearance of wood lap style siding, the hardy board should be an acceptable, if not
preferable, substitute.
Composite (a recycled plastic material with the appearance of wood) and fiberglass are not
listed as permitted exterior materials in the Neighborhood Business district; however these
materials are only used as the secondary material or trim material. The main building
material is brick which is a permitted building material.
D. Parking I Parking Setbacks - Meets requirement for parking spaces; parking setbacks are
3.9 feet below the standard.
As part of the applicant's changes, the three parking spaces closest to the townhouse
association property have been eliminated. This would bring the total number of parking
spaces to 302 which meets the City's parking standard of 297 (assuming 74,480 square
feet as the gross floor area). The total number of parking spaces includes 15 ADA .
spaces.
Parking setbacks are 16, I feet from the north property line and the Ramsey County right
of way. The 3.9 foot parking setback deficiency to the north should have little impact on
any other property owners. In addition, there is approximately another 45 feet of
boulevard between the applicant's north property line and the south curb line of Highway
96.
E. Traffic, Access, and Circulation - Meets requirement
During the public hearing at the June I, 2005 meeting, several people raised questions
about traffic and the impact to the road system and to their property. The traffic study
indicates that the development would not have much of an impact on the road system or
on neighboring properties. Potential delays in traffic from the project would be internal,
people exiting the site onto Hamline Avenue (to go eastbound or westbound on Highway
96), and not on the roadways themselves. Furthermore, since there are two access drives
it is likely that traffic that is either eastbound or westbound would exit the development
directly to Highway 96 rather than Hamline Avenue.
\\Earth\Planning\Planning Cases\1005\05-12 Arden Hills Office Park - Royal Oaks Realty - PUD, Preliminary Plat fOT Old City Hall & PW Site .
(PENDING)\07-06-05 PC Report Royal Oaks 05-12.doc
Page 4 018
, .
.
F. Lighting - Meets requirement.
Revised lighting plans have been submitted which meet the City's lighting requirements.
G. Plan Review Comments - Plan review comments received from the City Engineer, City
Planner, Operations and Maintenance Department, City Building Official, and Lake
Johanna Fire Department. Ramsey County Traffic Engineer comments are included as
an attachment. Final plans submitted for building permits should be revised as directed
by the following comments:
The hydrant that is in front of Unit 15 should be moved NE of Unit 12.
There is a possible need to add a hydrant near the front of Unit 25.
Each FDC needs to be within 150 feet of a fire hydrant.
FDC will need to be on front I address side of the buildings.
Two separate 2-hour fire walls are required at zero lot line, complying with IBC
503.2
All unitslbuildings to be sprinklered per State Building Code 1306.
Eliminate impervious surfaces to address landscape lot area deficiency.
Revised landscaping plans as per recommendation.
A small sign (similar to the park signs) could be added at the entrance to the City
trail to help with identification.
The road off of Hamline is tipped the wrong way. Refer to the last comment:
Please center the road along the southern part of the proj ect in the easement.
Consider tipping the road to the north and move CBII to the west, connect storm
sewer along the roadway to the west and into the parking lot. Another CB would
be needed at the parking lot entrance, which would connect to CB4. This would
eliminate the storm sewer that flows north from CB9 to the pond. Construct a
valley gutter or driveway apron at the day care entrance to facilitate drainage at
this point.
k. Developer must obtain proper Rice Creek Watershed permits and approval.
I. Developer must obtain approval from Ramsey County for access control to
Highway 96.
m. Please revise and submit final plans to the City of Arden Hills for approval.
n. Ped (pedestrian) ramps on the sidewalk at the Hamline Avenue entrance.
o. Need to construct a radius at the Hamline Avenue and day care entrance.
p. Please center roadway along the southern part of the project in the easement.
Consider tipping the road to the north and move CB I west, connect storm sewer
along the roadway to the west and into the parking lot. Another CB would be
needed at thc parking lot entrance, wbich would connect to CB4. This would
eliminate the storm sewer that flows north from CB9 to the pond. Construct a
valley gutter or driveway apron at the daycare entrance to facilitate drainage.
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.
1.
J.
.
.
\\Earth\Planning\Planning Cases\2005\05-12 Arden Hills Office Park - Royal Oaks Realty - PUD, Preliminary Plat for Old City Hall & PW Site
(PENDING)\07~06-05 PC Report Royal Oaks 05-12.doc
Page 5 of 8
Staff Recommendation
In Planning Case #05-12 staff recommends approval of the Master and Final Planned Unit and
Preliminary Plat subject to the following 15 conditions:
I. Revised Final Plans. The applicant shall submit revised plans, responsive to the
comments from the Plan Review Comments contained in City Planning File #05-12 for
review and approval by the City Planner, City Engineer, and City Building Official, prior
to issuance of building permits.
2. Development Timeline. The applicant's timeline for development shall be as follows:
· Phase I: Summer 2005 - The developer may begin grading, installing utilities,
and construction of storm water improvements. It is expected that construction on
3 buildings/16 units (presumably units 15-30), will also begin at this time. The 3
buildings/I 6 units are expected to be ready for occupancy by the Spring of 2006.
· Phase 2: Summer 2006 - The developer expects to begin construction on the
remaining 4 buildings/14 units (presumably 1-14) with expected occupancy of
these units by the Spring of2007.
Extensions beyond 2007 shall require application to the City Council for review and
approval. At the time of application for extensions, the City Council may include such
conditions of approval as they dctermine necessary for compliance with City Code.
3. Number of Businesses in a Unit. 30 office condominium uses have been proposed for
development on individual lots. Only one business shall be permitted to occupy anyone
lot within the development.
4. Retail Uses. Retail uses shall not be allowed to occupy any of the units in the proposed
development, except for incidental or accessory sales.
5. Restaurant Uses. Restaurant uses shall not be allowed to occupy any of the units in the
proposed development.
6. Residential Uses. Residential uses shall not be allowed to occupy any of the units in the
proposed development.
7. Landscaping Plans. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan for review and
approval by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. The revised
landscape plan shall include a mixture of coniferous and deciduous trees along the west
buffer yard of the development. The mixture of landscaping shall adequately screen the
development from the residential properties to the west.
8. Tree Preservation. The applicant and their contractors shall work with the City Planner
and City Forester to save as many existing, healthy, and well placed trees as possible in
the areas designated as landscape space.
9. Sign age. One freestanding monument sign at the Highway 96 entrance shall serve for
the development. Wall signage within the development shall include 30 square feet for
each unit shall be permitted in accordance with the City's Sign Ordinance. Each unit
shall have 30 square feet including the I square foot address and name plaque adjacent to
the main entry for the unit. The 30 squarc fcet of signage may be on the side of the
building or the front but not on the rear of the building. The unit signage of 30 square
feet may be illuminated by small decorative lighting fixtures which comply with the
\\Eanh\Planning\Planning Cases\2005\05-12 Arden Hills Office Park - Royal Oaks Realty - PUD, Preliminary Plat for Old City Hall & PW Site
(PENDING)\07-06-05 PC Report Royal Oaks 05-12.doc
Page 6 018
. ,
.
.
.
, ,
.
.
.
City's lighting standards. The building housing units 26-30 shall be permitted to have
one 60 square foot, internally illuminated sign which faces Highway 96 to the north,
This building shall be limited to 30 square feet on either the west or south sides of the
building, so that the total building signage would not exceed 90 square feet.
10. Screening of Mechanical Operating Equipment. All mechanical operating equipment
shall be screened to meet City regulations.
II. Decorative Fencing to Surround the Pond. Decorative painted fencing (like painted
wrought iron fencing) shall be erected around the pond at the northeast corner of the
property to protect pedestrians from falling into the pond.
12. Execution of a PUD Permit. Execution of a PUD Permit drafted by the City Attorney
and approved by the City Council prior to the issuance of a Building Permit.
13. Park Dedication. Satisfaction of the park dedication requirements as approved by the
City Council in the amount of$40,000.00.
14. Final Plat. The applicant shall submit an application for a Final Plat within six (6)
months following City Council approval of the PUD and Preliminary Plat.
15. Necessary Approvals from Other Agencies. The applicant shall obtain all necessary
permits from the Rice Creek Watershed District and Ramsey County.
Options
1.
2.
3.
Recommend approval as submitted.
Recommend approval with conditions.
Recommend denial with reasons for denial. If the City denies the petitioners request,
"...it must state in writing the reasons for the denial at the time it denies the request."
Table for additional information.
4.
Deadline for Al!encv Actions - PUD
PUD - deadline July 15, 2005
The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on May 16, 2005
Pursuant to Minnesota State Statue, the City must act on this request by July 15,2005 (60 days),
unless the city provides the petitioner with written reasons for and additional 60 day review
period. The City may with the petitioners' consent extend the review period beyond the 120
days.
Preliminary Plat - deadline September 13, 2005
With regard to subdivision applications, Minnesota State Statute 462.358 Subd. 3B indicates the
following:
A subdivision application shall be preliminarily approved or disapproved within 120
days following delivery of an application completed in compliance with the municipal
\\Earth\Planning\Ptanning Cases\2005\05-12 Arden Hills Office Park - Royal Oaks Realty - PUD, Preliminary Plat for Old City Hall & PW Site
(PENDING)\07-06-05 PC Report Royal Oaks 05-12.doc
Page 70f8
. ,
ordinance by the applicant to the municipality, unless an extension of the review period
has been agreed to by the applicant. .
This particular completed application was received on May 16,2005. As a result, the application
must receive a preliminary approval or denial of the plat by September 13, 2005.
Attachments
4a-1 Revised site plans, elevation with example sign, color rendering.
4a-2 Staff Report to the Planning Commission, attachments 4b3-4b-6 were not included
due to length, (plus staff report addendum) - June I, 2005
4a-3 Planning Commission Minute Excerpt - June 1,2005
4a-4 Comments from Ramsey County Traffic Engineer - May 20, 2005
4a-5 Comments/letters from residents since the June I, 2005 meeting.
.
\\Earth\Planning\Planning Cases\2Q05\05-12 Arden Hills Office Park - Royal Oaks Realty - POD, Preliminary Plat for Old City Hall & PW Site .
(PENDING)\07-06-05 PC Report Royal Oaks 05-12.doc
Page8of8
, .
~
.
.
Planning Commission Meeting
July 6,2005
Attachment 4a - 1
. ,
~--".-,;
( .l
ROYALI<2{iI5~
.
MEMORANDUM
To: The City if Arden Hills
From: Royal Oaks Realty
Date: June 20, 2005
Subject: Arden Hills Office Park
After the June 1 st Pltj.nning Commission meeting we asked our surveyors, E
G Rud & Sons, Inc. to stake the west property line, the south property line
and the comers of proposed buildings/units 1-3 and 4-8. We then met on site
with City staff (Public Works, Forester, Planners) on Tuesday June 7tl'. The
purpose of our meeting was to look at the existing location of the bike path,
to look at the trees on site, and to view the existing condition along the south
property line and the visibility of townhouse units to the south. .
It was the consensus of all that the bike path should remain in its present
location and moving the path to the west would require the removal of
natural screening along the back ofthe adjacent single family lots. The City
Forester did recommend that the existing boxelder trees leaning over the
pathway should be removed. Other existing trees along the west line would
be left in place and the underbrush would be cleaned out. We would also
work with City Staff in providing additional landscaping where necessary
and appropriate to "fill in" screening along the west line. The existing bike
path would be approximately eleven feet away from units 1-3 and
approximately 20 feet away from the west property line. This pathway is an
urban walking path with a variety of surroundings. South of the site the path
adjoins the rear of existing residential lots and next to six foot privacy
fences.
The City Forester recommended that we try to save an existing sugar maple
tree (30+ft.) on the property. The tree is now located west of the existing
municipal building. The tree would be in the parking lot in front of unit 6.
We will attempt to move/ transplant the tree to the open area between Units .
8 and 15.
1000 County Road E West.. Suite 150' Shorcview.. Minnesota 5S126' (651) 483-5S18' Fax (651) 483-5642
wwvv. rav a I 03 ksrea I tv. corn
"
("'
e
.
The existing conditions of the City property and the unkempt nature (thick
under brush) of the adjacent townhouse property made walking the south
property line very difficult. Very few townhouse units are visible from the
City property. The largest opening or exposed area ofthe townhouse
property is in the area south of units 15-19. We will work with the City staff
and make appropriate changes to the landscaping plan to add evergreen trees
in that area. The adjacent townhome association does not maintain their
property along our common lot line. Much of the area has thick under brush
and vegetation is left growing in its natural state.
We have provided three revised exhibits for the July 6th Planning
Commission meeting. They are; Site Plan, Lighting Plan and a Building
Rendering. The changeslrevisions to these exhibits are described as follows:
SITE PLAN
The major change to the site plan is a ten foot shift of units 15-19 to the west
and the elimination of three parking stalls in front of unit 20. These revisions
accomplish the zero encroachment/filling of wetland A as requested by Rice
Creek Watershed and it also moves the parking lot (and lighting) away from
the closest townhouse units to the south. We are also showing more sidewalk
connections near unit 26 and along side of units 1 1 and 12. We have also
provided for a connection to the city trail way system at a location on the
north side of unit one. This plan shows open space at 40.2%. We feel the
open space and landscaping plan meets the spirit and intent ofthe
Neighborhood Zoning District.
LIGHTING PLAN
The lighting plan was revised to show the latest building locations and
parking areas. Adjustments were made to the number and location of
fixtures in order to comply with the City's lighting regulations. The new
plan does not show meter readings of 0.4 candles on the adjoining property
lines. Hence, the adjacent residential properties will not be impacted by
parking lot lights.
BUILDING RENDERING
We are providing a new color rendering of the proposed buildings. The
exhibit portrays the exterior materials of brick and hardie board. Other
details shown on this rendering are the canopy above front entrances and a
uniform name/address sign next to each entrance. Individual business wall
sign will be limited to 30 sq. ft. and must be mounted on the wall sign band.
. .
(
\
No internal or back lighting will be allowed. Signs will be illuminated by
small light fixtures mounted to the wall above each sign. Weare requesting
that because one business will own units 26-30 that one additional wall sign
be allowed on the Highway 96 side ofthe building totaling 60 sq. ft.
.
.
.
,
"
n
>
I
15'0':;1
~~;
'''':;:
~~::l '"';l
if~~ ~
~~ g ~
g~;; ~
o.s-<~ .,
.- ""
~ <>:r t:'
~~; ~
c>'<" l""!
; &'3: 2S
~Ji ~
~'1;1? :::
g~ * 2
"
if."';,
;Qg
~~~
s.~g
. rft:l
,
.
~
"
^
.
,
ru
"
"
ru
c
"
"
o
I1III I
b lB dRd b
"'''':;!~:;;' :;;'
"'0 "'""'2' r
~~~~~QS
~'i!~;;:;f': f': ~
....-.:;;""r- r tol
!1li?:g~j! ~ "
~g~~~5$
1fl5~II~zg
:>c",!"':>> ~ i:il
;~:~~; s
~ <"1MP~'" t;;;
!.::o":!::E ~;I>-
g;S;II'J>It()
~~::; ~:g t"j
~5~ ~ ~ d
~Q ~ ~ ~ >-3
P\Il <..0 >-
~~ ~lB?;;
z ~ >
~. p ~
':? ~5
I1II Q'l
_"'''''" t"'l
UlOOO ~
g8~ g >
...,............("l
"'Ow"'''' ~
~r~~ (:l
z. .
o c
~~~ ~ ~
'i?l'-6~ ~
Q~~~ ::
iJJ ujl'"J
~ f; ~
. z ~
ot Cd.. _ ~ ~
<> :ll" ~ ~
~ '2~i; ~
J~~~
. ~ ~ ~
, ,
,,$$
l\ g ~ ~ ~
~ ~"6'~
;" ~ [!~
~, g!~ i i:
c "
g "'0
~ ~i
~ ~ ~ ~
0 '[ or ~ 3'l ;,:
~ ~~;~~
I <
, ~~p.~
~ ~!l.~~
I
~& ~'2-~
. og>g~",
0 .. ~ n.:;I ~
" >;: "I>~
n[~""
" i~~b-
" ~!1.:ng
~
~~~~~
:10&6-
ji~i~
~i2 .
H~ l!i
1~~ ,
~_Z: ..
l....'" ~
I .
I --' I
, ,
, ,
, ,
, I
- '-\- -- -- ---'-
'~_/ 1..0 of (h. N(l/~ M tho NWl/~ -or
So.. 2~. r~p. Sol, ling. 2J.
.
I III
1 ~~ ~ f
g !~ g~'
)1 3~ 0...'
l~~~~
~.~g;~ ~ IZ
~'9~g:~ 0
~ i>' ~ .. >-l
o ,,<l. ~ I"
:;r~..:p fA
g ::!~ll ~ .-
"-~. :t <::
I I~ ~ i
~ o.,lj;I:?
o 0,
"'. <> ~
~ '3 ~
~g~
,<":r:",
~8~
~ !l: '>
"'~<::
, &"
1 to.
1 ~
N
~
~
'"
i Ii<
. .i; 8
"~j
o 0
~ ~
o 0
r.l ,~
, 8
~ .
~ ~
8 ~
~ ~
o
~
0 ~ 0
, ~
"
0 Q ~
i:1 i:1 r;;
. Q ~ ~
~ 2
~ < !;'
~ ~ !
z
d
~
-..1)
~~
m
n;t~0 ~ r
fuO--t0Q :1
., ;Um0 J> -
"m IJTE r Z
~<0mO J>
cJl --t ~ ~
tp :1 8 (J) -<
"'z (::~
u,1JT Z m 1)
IJTIJT ~ f: r
\'jl~ ~-fJ>
0-<
J> --f
o
m
...
" ,. ~i ~t "
~ ;>>~:
r.;i,
'gl NOO'38'24"W
27M6
,
I"
'11
1,-
IP,
'. .
'I'
f?
~ "~1$''j>1"
b'; I'>~~'
~g...// '
,
328.66
1
!l e
H S!...~~;"w
h
, !'"' !~e
8
"
~
" ,
, ,
" I .,.
,
,
I
L ,
'.
?i'ii~d;gtZ ;::Jj!;g
........-1>-<00> I I I I g:vo
9>"'IliTl~~a,N~..,~;oiE;g
e:ll;:;l;gg~~~~~55<")f(l "0
"~co ;;Qoo!O:g1'Tl:<1C ll':l
~ ~~~~~~~:<-(>~~ ~
~"':l:=<::J: ",,~c:C ::Oz t"
~~ ~~d~~~ ~ClO
!;:1~~~1';cc III f2 ~ l-d
p-<>~[;l~~_"" -1s ~
a:~II"""'iii\1I ~:;:~ :~ '2
~<<>[;: g::j;;;~9! "'Il~""
:1:"'-'" :05:... ;;0% ~S!"O
q;::ot; 8"'1l~;;so;)- ;;So >-
:.i~~ ~~^~~ ~g-l
~~] N€~Ig~ ~~>~
z..,.. -<"'!eij>w ><r>
p~,: ~~~~ g~
:i:H!'" ~~l:l ~~ i::;
;;a",:Z: >lil R
~-P 8 ~ g; >
~ ? ~ ~ Vl I:Il
~?-- !S 3
~t':". .
~~ a ~
. 0
fl.e.. <r>
/
..i
"1
fti:-_
~ ~[
S'~!l,
~,.,g
,~r z
J~~ 00
;;.,t ~
&.~~ eo:
~: t:;l
'! ~
~~
~ !l.
H
.,
:->~
i
~!
,,~
~~
"
r
I C'jj'T1iiiJ
:, "l,[:~'L;j
=.
!
~
" ,.,
n '.
~
~
~ :'>
0 ,.
-z ,,.
...
...
!
~
~
,
~ ~~~
'H: \l.!
i"i, '
Sl~~-$
- ..,~Oj g
~~;~
""'~~-
~~i--~,",
Oj~~-.: g
~~;'l~
,."f!",
~~~~ ~
"'0;,1:;.. 8
~~~~
~-~~!~
ii *~~
~ ~~~
~~~S$
,. 8
'fi"'~
n
" "
~ S\
" ~
~oo
..,
'1'1 :,i"'\ ,- \~~:: ::,
I .' II;~: '" \ I.&~
I "",1
\ I~:; \ ,}., I
l- - -f~~- -'-- - -~ ---
~oo
- -I,~ - -\- - -\~~;~
, , . "S:)
.' "',.,. ", "':'~~~ Ii
II \ ~ , ",~:2 \
I'''''' I
I, I I
I \ I ; ___J
1.-___,---'----
,,J
,
-~
\
~~~~ "B '
""'~@o ~
;~} "
..,~ "'.
"~~~ ,@
~!~. q
~~ '!
I. !.
.~~.
i!:_",i~ "
0-(.... 1:;" f?,
,. ,~'"
~
.1
~
--;"
r- \
\ \
\ \
\
,
--;"
\
\
\
," \~'i
\li
\ ,,\
\ 0
,-
00
/,
\'"
\
\
\
'" \
\
\
\
...\--
! e
:0; ..,
\ .'
.. : ,.
...
,.
..
,..
\
\
,
! ~
>.
,/
__-I \~"'?~~
__ - ~--'\b~\\~:~
,--- , Ie;::) \ \
\ \\ \ \\~~~ \
\ \ \,f,:b \
\ \ \
\ \ \ \
\ \ \ J
\ -'-'-"
-'--
:';.
..,
..,
\
\
_\~.-
"
. "
^"
~
z
~~
...
I
.
-Ilo>
8
<P
--f
m
1)
r
J>
Z
s
o
-..
s
J>
~
o
m
Z
sI
"'
~r
tr
i<p
I~ ~
-n
()
m
1)
J>
~
7ft.
."
~
~
..
"
i I~
"
~
'"
i'l
'"
n
>
t;;
.
,'\JoJBS\Ro).,'OO"\Q,~",-";II,\n_\I'i.1J.' - 2.d~g
HUi
!.HH
ll~l
11m
i!H
, ~ ~
~ ~
'" -
~ ?
"""
m
~H
2.~ g
.HI
,g''''
;. ~ ~.
~n
'" ;;
d~
f~- ~
III
I. "
~ ;:
\~
, - Q
. z
~i g
i: ~
., ~
,~ in
~I ~
f'
"
I
~~
~
'"
=1
~
~
1 Ci
I:;
z
C1
."
s::
Z
EB' g
)>
-"
N
V1
C
OJ
$:
~
)>
r
-0 r" V1
r"Cl=i
PI""'
z...,
Z
Cl
r~I:; ::
v!'.; ~I
I~'
~
!g'
~
~
~
~
,.
; ~.
~
-'
"
c
~
~
~
~
~
~
"
"
,
3
~
~
,
~
,.
"
,.
,.
,.
c
"
"
g" ;;:
~
,
!
~ . ~ '. ~ ~
'-0'
"
"
~
~
~~"1" :':'"
:.< < ..... '"
I i
,.
"
o . 0
I'
,.
~
~
~
~. ij'
"
1,(1\]
1
~.
~
o
~
10;-
,,~1;."--~'1
.~~.
.
~~
"
~
-'
- ~.
~
~:f-n:., :. .
w '" "' .,
;;. p. ~ '"
,.. ",. ",.
"
,
~
b 1;,'
,
"
o
~
"
.
~
~.':.:':::''':i::::
~w,
~
~
,.
,.
o'
,
,.
o'
.
".~
'< .,
"
,.
:].
0'
~
,.
"
~
:;.
;:: ;, ---;; :' '?
~. i ~
0'
,.
!
"
~
1;" b
~
~
c
.
~
o
c
"
I
'r
"-
e'
~
g'
"
~
I
.
,
, ,
;
I
~
s
Jill I
,.
,.
,.
o'
,
~
,
~
~"
\';"
" .
~
~
"
a~
,
~
"
1;'
~
"
~
~
II!
: I I
! !
o'
~
~
~
"
~
"
o
"
~"
,,-, -
~
"
y
E'
OJ" :"
..
~
c
g'
"
,.
,.
,.
o'
.
"
,.
"
,.
,.
,.
~. 1 g
"
~.
:;;"
,.
~
~
,.
,.
"
,.
"
"
e' E"
,I'"
,-
g' ;1;"
"
,.
,.
~
,.
,.
,.
"
0'
o
~
,.
. '; ~~I.: I
~ ~ ^.Ui~ ,
i ;~s;~~~ ~ @
~~'".~ ~
a:=:~~;;IlIl z
m;;!:
~ ~ ~~;~i:
e'
,.
o'
,
,.
"
~
~
,.
,.
~
,.
:.
,
,
g
'I
,
1.
r
r'
,
0'
.
"
~
~....-~:j'
i (J 0
'" '-.
, ~ ro
I n
I c+
"
,.
VJ
J> s:
3
3
-0 9
") ")
o '<
1'-.
'r1J
n
c+
en
,.
~
g'
g'
~
n
;= p
c
3 n
:s~
p '0
~ m
m
"
"
"
"
""'lC
n ~
c+
en
g'
CDJ>
. <
~cc
,.
9J~
X
~
~
~
C)~
C5
,.
,.
.CD J>
W <
'(fJ
g-;....
3:
S
g'
~
OJ 3:
p
OX
0....
3:
~
:J
,.
0'
o
~
0'
.
;>~.~
m_O__
>'~g'
"',,;;';";!f":
~~~o~
^".~
".~~
~~Q"
.~~~~ J
~~u~ t,
,.,0 "
~oS1 ~
d
~~I
~u
Z
\:
3
m
J_,
n
~ ;:
s:co
;:;:ll,l::r
Q~ , .
a-CIl(C
fj~g:g:
i~t~
,
(/)""0,
'< ., \:
303
I tJ L_ :5
'\~~Y~:~
n
:y
m
Q.
\:
m
"D
")
W l--"KJo
OC)-rtL.
'< m
n
c+
en
nttJJ>i
p
G
m
~
,
,
,
t:J (/) W J>
~ ")
OJ Z ..'V .,
0 C1 p
, ....... :::5
Al r'l nJ(Q
0 Om
--j 3
cr> t:J .~
--j r'l :J
r'l C1 c+
t:J Al
r'l
r'l
(/)
- ~ - ,
'"" '"" --..j \:
Ul Ul UI 3
0 0 0 Cl)
0 0 0 :J
en
0 0 0 ,
--..J --..J '"" r-
CD 1"\) CD r'l
0 0 01
,
, , , t:J
(/) (/) (/) m
! 1 1 en
D cr> J> n
I I 1 'j
I I I l.l
I I I c+
~!:j -
--..J C
Ul Ul Ul :J
1 I I
Z Z ~
"D
u --C' D
DO'
"r'l
r'lr'l
i~ r<2 rD
tti
ttittiJ>
J>J>(/)
(/l (/) ;"1
r'lr'l
T fi~
""'l"lUl
'D'DI
1 I r'l
~ "l
~
CD CD
ru
~ . ::-L~11
,
~.
r
"
m
(j)
-I
-<
r
m
(j)
>0>
"'~'"
O:!!O
mnm
ZmZ
:!:~;;;;
~"'~
"Gl ?\ r;;
3:
Z
~.
\'
V1V'1V1~,,::l
<nICOO
~O=i8--<
.... ^' m >-
rn,....\()r-
~~~O
:if m>
. ~ G1
3: m",
Z ~~
~
-
. ....
"
.;f;.
t
l'j
,'~I
\,
<<'
:-;-~
.
"-
CD
:!J
<
m
II
I
o
c
Z
--l
;:::0
m
)>
;:::0
m
r-
m
<
~
,0
'z
~
~
4
.
x
-
Vl
II
6'
C
,j
.
:p
.
U
I L
II --
II
II
II
II
II
II
u"-----
II
II
II
II
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
II
, I
C1
I r-----
I'
II
II
II
I I
L~
II
I I
II
I I
II
, I
I
I
I
I
~
I
: I
I I
II
II
I'
I I
II
I I
II
II
II
I
I I
II
I I
II
I I
I I
II
II
U
"_
II
II
II
II
II
II
I'
uL
II
II
II
, I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
, I
II
II
I I
I I
II
I I
II
II
II
I I
I I
II
II
I I
C1
I r-----
I I
II
i I
II
, ,
C1-_
I I
II
, I
I
I
I
I
,
i
I
I I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
II
II
I I
, ,
II
I
I
I
.
,,'1
r
;1: :;
"I I
Ii: I ~
'" ':
ii. I
r!:d
'I;: I~
I" ,
:.iI1:
il'l)
Ii!! j
ii!; l!
, h c
, ,
!
Ii
,'II' 'I
; I, !
1'" I'"
.::1 '
ct. h
!I i:
;:11 n
,II I
i;!!! ti
'I n
ii
,i f
i! ) ~
li,I1,
'iii II
I"i ,:
,,:j: ~',
I:: I.
!iii /:
"",' I.'
i,l,
Iii
'"i [
i: lil)J
Iii l'ill!
!:i lilt l
I'! ;:1' II
Ii: Ii!; ~
" iI':!)" ,I
"',1 [','Ii
Iii .1,' 1:1'
q .::;I!
ii111 i: ilq
!ji II! ,.'
II:" Iii
1,:11 II'
f';! Ii I'ii
I'.! I: .Ii
Ii!; ~ ! I;
r,l>; ,I
i:i 11 H
I:;! Ii ;I:
""I' !Ii
:.;," i ill
ill
,I
-.> 1\ Iii!
I'I! ~ '!Ii
li<' ~ I i!
f(l j: -I!
ili! I] !ii
Wi I; 11'1
B! j ~ ! if
i: ~ I ii
Iii i ~ I 'I
,i ~ II"
II ji !.I
ft,\ g il:
" ,. ;1"
iii: It '
1'111,
Iii' .
,id Ii
Iii' ~
Iii! Ii
:i!! Ii
'III: Ii
1:1 i:
WI 1
il",',,',11
Ii!! ~,.!
'!Ir
',,',' I'i'"
Jill !!
"i:
;!i
ili'
pi! i,'j
Il!i
(I j:
, 'I i ','I f
'I ~ Ii ~,I I I II' Ii I ~
i ~. I II'! II \ I .11 I ii :!ll Ii
I II , ".1 I l II 'I , ~ Ii' '! )
, 'I" I ,. I' II ! ' I ~ I 'i
'I 1 , r ,;. iI i \ i ,! \ ". j: I' ! I i~ I
I j:i .t; i:! I 'Iii i j1 1.1 i i!1 I ~ ]1
'I.! i ~ III " ,I I II i I' I Ii I I' i I:' '
I 'if I Ii" '.' I' . 'I',
, _ II' .i' ~ ; I:. i 'i I' I
III '! if I : \ ! I: i Ii ~ ! I: !
,I. hi 1: I,,: II " =Ii'
,I I i ~ 'I h : ,',i i Ii ,~J Pi: i
_ _ ~ i i ,:: : ! i ii':! i! i I J
'" : 111 I. I, ;,'1
.'!!' ,": I,' I': I'!)
I Ii 1"1 I ill[
"1'1 t" , ",,,
::1, ii!! If lilt
I:i !I!i: \i:',
) !!!i ~ iI; I
'.!, ',' ""'I
"'1'1"
I iii ,i(
:.. .'i!)!!
iii
"
'I:
i ~ ! i:
HI II ii,
I " ~ ; I
l:i!l! ii,
,'" /," I,"
.', ,"
.
"
.
.
.
.
"
::
"
"
"
"
::
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
::
"
"
"
i:
::
"
"
U
_____JI
"
::
,..
"
u___~:
u
"
::
"
"
"
"
::
"
ii
Ii
::
::
"
"
W
"
"
"
"
:i
--11
n
"
"
::
ii
"
i:
"
:i
!:
"
,..
"
"
"
"
"
"
~ :
"
::
"
"
Ii
---n
"
"
"
"
. ~ ,
u
"
"
"
"
"
i\
"
"
(\
"
"
"
"
"
::
::
~
"
"
"
"
"
"
----{:
- '
--'-'
"
"
"
"
"
ii
"
"
"
!!
"
::
"
"
"
'i
,
I
Z"
0'
~I
uj'l
'"
<(
~I
t::L
z!c:
~i'
~I"
> '.:.:
u: I~
,
/T"
(,-")!;::J\
\._,y
.J
..J
t
~
~
<:
I
D
ul
.;
":J
~
et:
Planning Commission Meeting
July 6, 2005
Attachment 4a - 2
. . '
.
.
.
t , I;
.
.
.
~
~HILLS
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
PC Agenda Item 4.B
June I, 2005
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Peter Hellegers, City Planner
SUBJECT: PC #05-12; Royal Oaks Realty, Inc.
Master and Final Plan PUD and Preliminary Plat for the Old City Hall! PW site
1440-1450 W. Highway 96 "Arden Hills Office Park"
ReQuested Action
Consider the requested Master and Final PUD and Preliminary Plat for the redevelopment of the
old City Hall! Public Works property as a 7 building, 30 unit, office condominium complex.
Backl!round
Surrounding Area
North
Public and Institutional
CC: Civic Center
Public & Institutional
Single Family Attached
Residential
South
R-3: Townhouse and Low
Densi Multi Ie Dwellin
NB: Neighborhood Business
Neighborhood Commercial
Single Family Detached
Residential
Medium Density Residential
East
Neighborhood Business
West
Low Density Residential
R-l: Single Family Residential
Site Data
Neighborhood Business
Vacant (fonner City Han / Public Works garage)
R-I: Single Family Residential (west half [City Council to consider rezoning this
area on 5/31/05]) / NIl: Nei borhood Business (east halt)
Subject Property excluding Hwy 96 ROW: 6.83 acres (297,752 square feet)
0.25 (0.27?)
Slopes from west/southwest dO\vn to the east/northeast
Master and Pinal Planned Unit Development and Preliminarv Plat
N:\Planning Cases\2005\05-l2 Arden Hills Office Park - Royal Oaks Realty - PUD, Preliminary Plat for Old City HaJJ & PW Site
(PENDING)\06-01-0S PC Report Royal Oaks OS-12_doc
Page] of]8
,..,..:
.' . 1
>
The applicant has requested that the Planning Commission review two actions for this property
which are (listed in the order that they will be reviewed):
.
· Master and Final Planned Unit Development (POO) / Special Use Permit
. Preliminary Plat
Overview
The applicant has proposed redeveloping the old City Hall 1 Public Works garage property into a
7 building, 30 unit office condominium complex. The property would utilize the existing
driveway approach from Highway 96 and an existing access easement to Hamline A venue. The
plans show the 5 westernmost buildings (and units 1-19) as I-story and 2-story Imits with slab on
grade construction. The remaining 2 buildings (units 20-30) would be I and 2-story walkouts
which appear to be two stories from the front of the building, and the exposed basement makes
the buildings appear to be 3 stories from the rear. Since the grade slopes downward to the
northeast portion of the site, units 20-25 would have their front facing the west ~nd the rear (with
walkout basements) facing the east. Units 26-30 would face to the south and have their rear with
walkout basements facing the water retention pond and Highway 96. The exteriors of the
buildings would be predominantly brick (on all four sides of the buildings, as per NB
regulations), stucco on the upper gable roof ends, and wood pillars and columns. Roofmaterials
are proposed as fiberglass shingles. The application also states that earth tone colors will be used
(in the development).
The applicant indicated the following proposed timeline for development:
.
Summer 2005 -
Begin grading, installing utilities, and construction of storm water improvements.
Begin construction on 3 buildings/16 units (presumably units 15-30)
Winter 20051
Spring 2006
The 3 buildings!l6 units should be ready for occupancy
Summer 2006
Begin cOIlt'truction on the remaining 4 buildings!l4 units (presumably units 1-14)
(Winter 2006/
Spring 2007?)
(Assuming occupancy for units 1-14? This is not stated in application)
Master and Final PUD
A Plmmed Unit Development (POO) would be necessary for this proposal because it
contemplates developing six pieces of property (subsequently consolidated into two tax parcels)
in a unified mmmer as 30 office condominiums with common area. In addition, the
Neighborhood Business District section states that proposals should be presented in the spirit and
intcnt of the Planned Unit Development provision of the Zoning Ordinance. The Planned Unit
\\EarthI.PlanningI.Plallning Cases\200S\05-12 Arden Hills Office Park - Royal Oaks Realty ~ PUD, Preliminary Plat for Old City Hall & PW Site .
(PENDlNG)\06-0l-04 PC Report Royal Oaks OS-12.doc
Page 2 of 18
, . ,
.
.
.
/--.-)
{ }
Development (POO) process allows flexibility in reviewing the setbacks, layout, design, and
other aspects of development; to allow a development is in the best interest of both the applicant
and the City.
The applicant has requested additional signage area, use of a building material which is not
included in the NB District building materials, and reduced parking setbacks along the northern
portion of the site. The applicant has also proposed the following features to offset some of the
aforementioned deficiencies: a monument style freestanding sign, superior building materials
and design for the use, and a landscaping plan with caliper inches of trees greatly exceeding the
requirements.
Preliminary Plat
The proposed plat would create would create 31 lots; one for each office condominium and one
lot as the common area for the entire development. The common lot, Lot 31, would contain all
of the parking, green spaces, access drives, trash enclosures, wetlands, storm water facilities, and
most of the landscaping. Lots I through 30 would include the office condominium uses and a
ten foot clear space around all exterior walls. In addition the plat calls for vacating a pedestrian
way in the middle of the property where no trail or walkway was ever built, and dedicates a 20-
foot wide area at the west side of the property to relocate the existing City trail.
Review of a Preliminary Plat encompasses many of the criteria which will already be covered by
review of the other three actions requested, however they also have a slightly longer review
period. Therefore staff has included a separate Preliminary Plat review section (after the Plan
Review Comments) which will cover items that were not previously discussed.
Plan Review
lA. Zoning - NB regulations call for developments to be reviewed in spirit and intent of the
Planned Unit Development process.
Lot Size
This proposal would require a preliminary plat. The mtmmum lot size for a single
development in the NB district is 13,000 square feet with minimum lot dimensions of 100
feet by 130 feet. The proposed development totals about 297,752 square feet with a lot depth
of277.66 feet and a lot width of 1072.90 feet.
Building Setbacks
Following is a comparison of the eXlstmg and proposed setbacks as compared with the
setback standards established by the Zoning Ordinance.
\\Earth'J'lanning\Plannillg Cases\2005\OS-12 Arden llills Office Park - Royal Oaks Realty ~ PUD, Preliminary Plat for Old City Hall & PW Site
(PENDING)\06-01-04 PC Report Royal Oaks 05-J2.doc
Page 3 of 18
,
C)
, . .
Front Yard 20' 62' (unit 25)
Rear Yard 20' *30'
Side Yard Interior 5/15' **30'
.
*NB regulations require buffer yards of 30 feet where development is proposed adjacent to residential
areas.
**The dedication of the pedestrian way at the west side of the property provides legal status for the
City trail in this location (the existing trail is proposed to be straightened out and relocated slightly to
the west). While having this pedestrian way dedicated is a desirable feature, it essentially shrinks the
setback for the building housing units 1-3 from 30 feet to 10 feet.
Use
The use of the property is proposed as office condominiums. Office is a permitted use in the
Neighborhood Business Zoning District. Other permitted uses include: clinics not to exceed
3,000 gross square feet; financial institutions and services not to exceed 5,000 square feet
(and only those that do not have a drive-thru facility nor an outdoor or detached automated
kiosk); and certain types of retail sales and services, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, and
including only the following: antiques, art and school supplies, bakeries, bicycles (not
motorized), books, stationery, candy, camera and photographic supplies, carpets and rugs,
china and glassware, clothing and costume rental, convenience store, custom dressmaking,
dmgs, dry goods, florist, garden supplies (year-round operation only), gifts, grocery,
hardware, hats, hobby shops, household appliance repair, interior decorating (no retail
furniture sales), jewelry, locksmith shops, musical instruments, paint and wallpaper, shoes,
sporting goods, tobacco, toys, and wearing apparel, and similar type uses.
.
Special uses include restaurants not to exceed 3,000 gross square feet (exterior seating will
be considered based on its impact to adjacent .residential uses outside of the neighborhood
business district) and dwelling units as part of a mixed use development including non-
residential structures. Automobile related businesses, liquor stores, and restaurants,
exceeding 40 percent in gross liquor receipts of the total food and liquor receipts, would are
prohibited in the Neighborhood Business District. Consideration for special uses would
require that the applicant return to the Planning Commission and City Council for review of a
special use permit/mnendment to the POO. This process would involve a similar public
hearing process to the one used for this planning case. Consideration for any prohibited uses
could only be considered through a Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment, which again would
require a similar public hearing process.
While currently the use of the site has only been proposed as "office condominiums", it is
important that the Planning Commission specify their expectations for current and future use
of the site through conditions in the Plmmed Unit Development document. If for example the
Planning Commission did not want a retail use, which is otherwise permitted in the NB
district, a condition should be added to the POO document. Another way to address this
\\Earth\Plannlng\Plannin~ Cases\2005\05~ 12 Arden Hills Offiec Park - Royal Oaks Realty ~ PUD, Prelimillary Plat for Old City Hall & PW Site .
(PENDING)\06-01 -04 PC Reporl Royal Oaks 05-12.doc
Page 4 of 18
, .
.
.
.
\ )
()
, '
issue would be to state that no more than a certain percent ofthe development could be retail,
clinic, Oi" financial institution. Ifno such language is included in the POO document, then it
is possible that subsequent users of the "office condominium" spaces could utilize the space
consistent with those uses listed as permitted uses in the NB district. To clarify, the applicant
has only proposed office condominiums for the site.
Use of the office condominiums is assumed to be one user per space. However it is possible
that individual owners would attempt to sublease part of their space to another user. If the
desire of the Planning Commission is to maintain the units as one user per unit, then a
condition should be added to the POO document to that effect.
2A. Building Area 1 Floor Area Ratio - Meets requirements
The Floor Area Ratio (FAR) measures the total square feet of building area relative to the lot
size. The floor area ratio requirement for the NB District is .70. The proposal shows a floor
area ratio of .26 for the development
(Square Feet)
208,426
(%)
70 % Max
(Square Feet)
76,000 appx.
(%)
26%
3A, Lot COvered by Structure - Meets requirements
The lot coverage by structure measures the mnount of the subject property covered by
building footprint (both principal and accessory buildings). The lot coverage requirement for
the NB district is 35 percent. The proposal shows lot coverage of 15.6 percent.
(%)
35 % Max
(Square Feet)
46,569
(%)
15.6%
4A. Landscape Lot Area! Landscaping - Does not meet landscape area requirement; meets
minimum total caliper inch landscaping requirement; meets buffer yard requirements;
recommend modifications to buffer yard landscaping to include more coniferous.
The landscape lot area of a property may consist of: naturally vegetated areas, wetlands or
ponding areas, planting beds, ground cover and mulch areas, decorative walkways (not to
\\Earth\Planning\P1:mning Cases\2005\05-l2 Ardell Hills Office Park - Royal Oaks Realty - PUD, Preliminary Plat for Old City Hall & PW Site
(PENDING)\06-0l-04 PC Report ROy<1l Oaks 05-12.doc
Page 5 of 18
CJ
o
. ,
exceed 15% of the required landscape lot area), and outdoor recreation areas. The inverse of
the landscape lot area also determines the amount of hard surface area a property may have
(i.e. 35% landscape lot area = 65% hard surface area).
.
One ess"ntial point for calculating landscape lot area comes from Zoning Section 6Elc
which states: "Areas less than ten (10) feet in width. or isolated and less than five hundred
(500) square feet in size, shall not be included in landscape area requirements." Based on
this regulation, small areas by the front doors of the office units and the isolated parking
islands cannot be calculated into the overall landscape lot area.
Landscape Lot Area
(Square
Feet)
104,213
(%)
35 %Min
99,370
*33%
*The applicant states that the amount of landscape lot area is approximately 40%; staffs
calculations (taking into account Section 6El c) indicate that the number is closer to 33%, or
about 5,000 square feet below the requirement.
Minimum Landscaping Requirements
Under the City's landscape plan design requirements 237.50 caliper inches of trees are .
required (the minimum total caliper inches required for trees can be arrived at by dividing the
gross square footage of all floors of the building (76,000 by 320) for this case. Since this is a
Neighborhood Business area, the special requirements call for additional landscaping of 3
caliper inches per 40 feet of public street frontage (3 x 26.82 [1072.90/40)) which turns out to
be 80.47 caliper inches. The total required caliper inches of trees per these minimum
landscaping requirements is 317.97 caliper inches. The applicant has proposed 375.5-433
caliper inches of deciduous and ornamental trees and 132.5 caliper inches of coniferous trees
on the site. The result is 508-565.5 total caliper inches of new trees, which meets the
requirement per the minimum landscaping requirements. It should be noted that 232.5 to 249
caliper inches of the landscaping is proposed for the area south of the Highway 96 trail in
Ramsey County right of way. A condition should be included in the PUD document that the
applicant shall require Ramsey County approve for planting in the right of way area. In
addition, the condition should also require the applicant to replace this landscaping should it
fail or be removed for any reason subject to approval of Ramsey County.
The applicant has also proposed to preserve seven (7) existing trees which would equal 100
caliper inches. The preserved trees are fairly substantial and include: two II inch diameter
Pines, one 10 inch dimneter Pine, one 14 inch diameter Basswood, one 16 inch dimneter
Basswood, one 18 inch diameter Ash, one 15 inch diameter Ash, and one 5 inch diameter
Spruce. The grand total of trees not in the buffer area is 603-660.5 total caliper inches (one 5
\\Eanh\Plannillg\Planning Cases\2005\05- J 2 Arden Hills Office Park - Royal Oaks Realty PUD, Preliminary Plat for Old City Hall & PW Site
(PENDTNG)\06-01-04 PC Report Royal Oaks 05-12.doc
Page 6 of 18
.
, ..
('.
1 )
\'. ...~
()
, inch dimneter spruce is not included in the table below as it is located within the 30' buffer
. yard).
The caliper inches of trees proposed are compared to the caliper inches of trees required per
the City of Arden Hills Landscaping Plan standards on table below.
.
.
Caliper Inches of Trees (required I proposed)
1-2 Stories
30 % (95.39)
20 % (63.59)
50 % (158.99)
Proposed # of
Caliper Inches
(240-285.5)
(140-160)
(203-215)
-~
**The coniferous trees are listed under the 2-3" caliper category (6' tree height/2.4 = 2.5 c.i.)
Buffer Yards (Special Requirement of the Neighborhood Business District)
In addition to the Minimum Landscaping Requirements the Neighborhood Business District also
rcquires buffer yards. Following is language from Section 5, H, 5, b ofthe Zoning Ordinance:
"Buffer yards 30 feet in width shall be provided adjacent to all residential uses
outside the neighborhood business district. The buffer yard shall be landscaped
with a combination of evergreen trees (six-foot high minimum) and deciduous
trees (three-inch caliper minimum) such that the use is effectively screened from
the adjacent residences. The buffer yard landscaping shall not be inclwied into
the minimum landscaping calculation (Section A, 5, A). "
Based on this language additional landscaping material and green space should be provided to
effectively screenlbuffer adjacent residential properties from the development. The residential
properties here are to the south and to the west. The applicant has proposed landscaping of
337.5-368.5 caliper inches oflandscaping in the 30-foot buffer yard areas. These amounts could
not be included in the table above.
Staff would recommend a condition in the POO document to modify the landscaping in the 30-
foot buffer along the west property line from the current design of solely deciduous and
ornamental trees (Spring Snow Crabapples and Amur Maples), to include coniferous trees. This
will provide better year-round screening for the properties to the west. In addition, staff would
recommend that the Colorado Spruce and American Linden trees to the southeast of unit #20
(SOUtll of the trash enclosure) be switched around to create a larger grouping of the Spruce. This
should prevent the headlight glare from southbound traffic from becoming a nuisance for the
residential properties to the south.
\\Earth\Planlling\Planning Cases\200S\05-l2 Arden Hills Office Park - Royal Oaks Realty - PlJD, Preliminary Plat for Old City Hall & PW Site
(PENDlNG)\06-01 -04 PC Report Royal Oaks 05-12.doc
Page 7 of 18
C)
~-_.../
( )
.. ,
6A. Signage - Clarification needed on wall signage, clarification needed on freestanding sign
lighting; meets all other sign requirements. .
The plans do not indicate locations of sign age for the property. Sign age for the property as
permitted by the Sign Ordinance would include the following:
Signage
Type of Sign Sign District 8 Regulations Proposed
Wall Sienaee Max Area 30 sf *#30 sf
Max Height 14 ft -
Li!!htin!! Not permitted #External/U nspecified
Freestandine Signage Max Area 60 sf **50 sf
Max Height 8ft 6ft
(sign and SUIJPort)
Lightin!! External/Internal ***lnternallBacklit?
Auxiliary Sienaee Wall 6 sf Insufficient data
Freestanding 6 sf Insufficient data
Max Height Wall 6ft 1-2 ft
(of Sign Face)
Freestandine 6ft 3.5 ft
* Section 333.9 of the Sign Ordinance: "In multi-tenant buildings or sites the permitted sign area and sign types,
except for permitted freestanding signs, may be installed by each individual business establishment that has
exclusive use of some portion of the street or otherwise primary level of the building and direCT access to the
outside. "- All 30 units could have 30 sf of unlit wall signage. .
**The applicant's letter states that they are requesting a sign of 120 square feet which is the total sign mass. The 50
square feet shmvn above is the area of the sign face, which is what this provision regulates.
***The plans show PIN mounted letters on a metal panel. The assumption is that these are illuminated channel
letters which would be permitted. The sign ordinance does not allow the face of the sign to be backlit in this sign
district.
#The application is confusing in that it shows the "Typical Address Sign and Light" (sheet A2.2) and also include
areas on the walls for "Optional Signage" (on both sheets A2.1 and A2.2). It appears that every unit would have the
extemally illuminate "Address Sign and Light" and unit owners could purchase the "Optional Signage." While it
appears that a unit owner could have both signs and still meet our sign size criteria (total would be about 21 sf), the
total amount of signage on the building could be 126 sf (on the 6 unit building). Staff reconunends a condition in
the POO document establishing a comprehensive sign plan for the development (as part of or an addendum to the
PUD document) which would place restrictions on the location and design of signage.
7A. Aesthetics/Building Materials - Main building material meets requirement,
secondary/trim materials are not included as permitted exterior materials.
The site layout includes four buildings with I and 2-story units slab on grade. The remaining 3
buildings would be I and 2-story walkouts. The overall design of the buildings is supposed to
give the impression of a residential townhouse development. Dormers are used above the 1-
story units to give the impression of a second floor. The 2-story units include the gables where
actual windows would bring light into the office condominiums.
\\Earth\Planning\Planning Cases\2005\05-12 Arden I!ills Office Park - Royal Oaks Realty - PUD, Preliminary Pl:'lt fOT Old City Hall & PW Site .
(PENDING)\06-0l-04 PC Report Royal Oaks 05-12.doc
Page 8 of 18
.
.
.
(....)
\,
C)
The two easternmost buildings would include the walkout units. The building containing units
20-25 would face the west with the exposed walkout basement side to the east. The building
containing units 26-30 would face the south with the exposed walkout side facing Highway 96 to
the north. These buildings contain both I and 2-story walkout units; however the 2-story units
are never the end units. Therefore, when looking from the south or east the view would be of a
I-story walkout unit. The closest 2-story walkout unit to the south property line is unit #22
which is 135 feet (unit to townhouse building) from the closest townhouse to the south. The
closest 2-story walkout unit to the east property line is unit #29 which is 85 feet away from the
day care center building. The closest I-story units to the property lines are setback 30 feet
consistent with the NB district requirements. All of the units would meet the 35-foot height
requirement.
The primary building materials include brick, stucco, and glass. The trim is a composite material
painted "Manchester Tan". The decorative columns are fiberglass painted to match the trim.
The roof is a "Georgetown Grey" asphalt shingle. Aluminum is used for the soffits and gutters
(painted to match the trim), and a small precast concrete band (color Anchor Block: Sahara) is
used for the sill. The building materials are consistent on all four sides of the buildings with the
brick extending to just above the doors and windows, just below the roofline. The gables are
proposed to be stucco.
Stucco, composite, and fiberglass are not listed as permitted exterior materials in the
Neighborhood Business district; however these materials are used as the secondary material or
trim material. The main building material is brick which is a permitted building material.
SA. Height of Buildings - Meets requirements.
Thc exterior of the buildings are shown on the exterior elevations (sheet A2.1 and A2.2 in the
applicant's submitted plans). The height of the buildings appear to be 26 feet or less along most
faces ofthe building, 33 feet along the walkout faces of the buildings.
Proposed Buildings and Building Additions
~
. 35 ft 26-33 ft
* Building height is defined in Zoning Section 2, D, 21 as: The vertical distance from the average elevation of the
grade along a face of a building to the highest point of the roof surface of flat roofs, the deck line of mansard
roofs, or the average height between the eaves and the highest ridge of gable, hip, or gambrel roofs. The height
of a stepped or terraced building shall be the height of the tallest segment of the building.
9A. Parkiug 1 Parkiug Setbacks - Meets requirement
Applicable parking standards include the following:
\\Earth\Planning\Planning Cases\2005\05-12 Arden Hills Office Park - Royal Oaks Realty - PUD, Preliminary Plal for Old City Hall & PW Site
(PENDJNG)\06~Ol-04 PC Report Royal Oaks OS-12.doc
Page 9 of18
,-)
\./
j
" '
Business 1 Professional Office:
I space for each 250 sq. feet of gross floor area
Assuming 76,000 square feet of office space the parking standards would call for 304
parking spaces (applicant's plans state City requirement is 298.6). The applicant has
proposed 306 parking spaces including 15 ADA spaces (8 ADA spaces would be
required) .
.
As noted in the number 4A of this report, the development does not appear to meet the
landscape lot area requirement. One way to address the deficiency is to remove some of
the impervious parking areas. Staff has identified three areas that could be removed
which would allow the development to meet the landscape lot area requirement.
However, turning these areas over to landscape lot area would eliminate 15 parking
spaces.
Minimum parking setbacks are five (5) feet from adjacent side and rear property lines and
twenty (20) feet from the right-of-way line of any public street. The applicant's proposal
contemplates parking setbacks of 18 feet from the east, 20 feet from the south (the access
drive to Hamline gets as close as 5 feet from the south property line), and 16.1 feet to the
Rmnsey County right of way. The 3.9 foot parking setback deficiency to the north should
have little impact on any other property owners. In addition, there is approximately
another 45 feet of boulevard between the applicant's north property line and the south
curb line of Highway 96.
lOA. Traffic, Access, and Circulation - Meets requirement
.
The City Engineer and the County Engineer have reviewed the applicant's plans and
traffic study. The County Engineer has indicated that traffic generated by the
development will not measurably impact existing traffic operations. The traffic study
that was submitted indicates that development would generate and average of 868 daily
trips with approximately 118 trips in during the peak A.M. hours and 15 trips out.
During the peak P.M. hours, the traffic study indicates approximately 16 trips in and 98
trips out.
At the April 19,2005 neighborhood meeting for Planning Case #05-12, several residents
raised concerns about the traffic to be generated by the development and in particular the
impact at Hamline Avenue and also at Keithson Drive. The traffic study shows that large
majority of traffic on Hamline during the peak A.M. hours is headed southbound. The
year 2007 build and no-build forecasts show a difference of 20 more trips southbound on
Hamline and into the development and 40 more trips northbound and into the
development. During the peak P.M. hours when traffic is headed northbound, the 2007
forecasts show 30 more left turns onto northbound Hamline to turn onto westbound
Highway 96. This change should not impact the traffic on Hamline Avenue; it would be
felt most by the traffic from the development. The alternative to this turning movement
would be to exit from the Highway 96 access onto eastbound Highway 96 and make a U-
\\Earth\Planning\Planning Cases\2005\05-12 Arden Hills Office Park - Royal Oaks Realty - PUD, Preliminary Plat for Old City Hall & PW Site .
(PENDJNG)\06-01-04 PC Report Royal Oaks OS~12.doc
Page 10 of 18
, ..
e
.
.
f<---'
I,)
()
turn onto westbound Highway 96 at the protect left turn at Hamhne. This is a turning
movement the Ramsey County Traffic Engineer is comfortable with. Traffic at Keithson
should not be impacted much at all. While it is possible that westbound traffic may
attempt to make a U-turn at Keithson to reach the Highway 96 access for the
development, the majority of westbound traffic would make a left turn at Hamline
Avenue and then the right turn into the development. The traffic study indicates that
there will be approximately 20 more of these turning movements under the 2007 build
scenario. Should westbound traffic attempt to make the U-turn at Keithson, the County
Traffic Engineer indicated that there is sufficient roadway width and the sightIines
(Keithson is at the crest of the hill) are good.
A copy of the traffic study has been included in the attachments for your review.
One additional access item is the provision of sidewalks/walkways. Currently, there are
walkways which connect some of the buildings but there are no connections to the City
trail to the west of the Highway 96 trail to the north. A condition should be added to the
POO document requiring a revised plan for review and approval by the City Plmmer and
City Engineer with connections to these trails and connections throughout the interior of
the development prior to the issuance of building permits.
Bike racks have been provided in four locations near the fronts of the buildings, making
the site viable for bicycle access as per the requirements of the NB district.
llA. Screening - Meets requirement for dumpster enclosures; see landscaping (4A) for
landscape/screening recommendations; add condition relative to mechanical operation
equipment.
Screening (as stated in section SA, buffer yards) is required to be a minimum of 60%
opacity between this property and the neighboring residential properties to the north. In
addition mechanical equipment is required to be screened from view and dumpsters are
required to be placed within dumpster enclosures.
The dumpster enclosures are proposed with a brick veneer to match the buildings and an
asphalt shingle roof to match the buildings. A stained Cedar gate would provide access
to the dumpsters.
Mechanical operation equipment is not shown on the plans. All such equipment shall be
required to be screened from view consistent with the City's Zoning Ordinance. A
condition should be added to the POO document reinforcing this requirement.
See Section 4A for recommendations relative to landscaping screening.
12A. Lighting - Does not meet foot candle illuminate requirements
General requirements for lighting state that the source ofIighting shall be concealed or
\\Farth\Planning\Planning Cases\2005\05-l2 Arden Hills Office Park - Royal Oaks Realty - PUD, Prelimillary Plat for Old City Hall & PW Site
(PENDING)\06-01-04 PC Report Royal Oaks 05-12.doc
Page 11 of 18
( )
.. '
hooded and also that lights shall not cast light exceeding a meter reading of 1.0 foot
candle on the travel lanes of adjoining public streets or 004 foot candles on adjoining .
residential property.
Neighborhood Business District requirements state that parking lot lighting poles shall
not be taller than 14 feet. Lighting shall not wash the building except for accent lighting
to delineate the main entry to the building.
Parking lot lighting is now proposed as 12-foot poles on a 2-foot base. The lighting plan
shows lighting levels in excess of the City requirement of 004 foot candles along the south
property line. The parking lot lights directly west of unit #20 and along the access road
from Hamline Avenue should have shields added to reduce the lighting levels to meet
City regulations. Additionally, all lighting sources are required to be concealed.
The elevation plans show an address sign with a light above it outside each of the unit
entryways. These lighting fixtures should be included in the photometric plans so that
the overall lighting levels can be determincd.
A condition should be added to the POO document that lighting cut sheets and revised
photometric plans shall be submitted to the City Planner for review and approval prior to
the issuance of building permits.
13A. Grading, Drainage, and Utilities - Revised plans required as per comments of City
Engineer regarding Grading. Drainage, and Utilities. .
The City Engineer has made several recommendations relative to grading, drainage, and
utilities which are included in the Plan Revicw Comments section.
The pond at the northeast corner of the site could be a hazard to people using the trail on
Highway 96 if they lost control of their bicycle. A decorative fence (like the wrought
iron fence at the CSM property located at Cmmnings Park Drive and Lexington) should
eliminate the possibility of a pedestrian accidentally faIling into the pond. A condition to
this effect should be added to the POO document.
The applicant would also be required to obtain the necessary permits from the Rice Creek
Watershed District in regard to drainage, erosion control, and storm water.
14A. Plan Review Comments - Plan review comments received from the City Engineer, City
Planner, Operations and Maintenance Department, City Building Official, Lake Johanna
Fire Department, and Ramsey County
a. The hydrant that is in front of Unit 15 should be moved NE of Unit 12.
b. There is a possible need to add a hydrant near the front of Unit 25.
c. Each FDC needs to be within 150 feet of a fire hydrant.
d. FDC will need to be on front I address side of the buildings.
\\Earth\Planning\J'lanning Cases\200S\05-l2 Arden Hills Office Park - Royal Oaks Realty - PUD, Preliminary Plat for Old City Hall & P\V Site .
(PENDINCJ)\06~OI~04 PC Report Royal Oaks 05-12.doc
Page 12 of 18
/')
\j
, . .
, e.
. f.
g.
h.
1.
J.
k.
I.
m.
.
Two separate 2-hour fire walls are required at zero lot line, complying with IBC
503.2
All unitslbuildings to be sprinklered per State Building Code 1306.
Sidewalks should be connected throughout the development and also to the City
and County trails.
The City trail at the west side of the property should remain (okay to straighten
and shift slightly west).
Development signage could be done in a similar style to the AH park and gateway
SIgnS.
Eliminate impervious surfaces to address landscape lot area deficiency.
Revised landscaping plans as per recommendation under 4A.
A small sign (similar to the park signs) could be added at the entrance to the City
trail to help with identification.
The County concurs with the methodology used for trip generation and trip
distribution as discussed in the traffic study prepared by Traffic Data Inc. The
development of Office Condominiums on the site is expected to generate 868 trips
per day.
n. Access to the site from the right i!l!right out driveway on Highway 96 will operate
adequately. The County agrees with the study recommendation to sign and mark
the right turn lane from westbound Highway 96 into the site. The developer will
be required to add appropriate signs and markings to designate a right turn lane.
o. The proposed access on Hamline Avenue will be located at the existing access to
the daycare with the daycare driveway connected into this new entrance road.
Left turns exiting onto Hamline Avenue in the p.m. peak hour will be
problematic. Northbound Hainline Avenue traffic frequently backs up past this
entrance. This will result in delay for vehicles exiting the site onto Hamline
Avenue. It is expected that if the delay here is too great, more vehicles will use
the access on Highway 96. This may result in U-turns on Highway 96 and
Hamline Avenue for drivers wishing to go west. This should not be a problem on
a protected left turn phase.
p. The County concurs with the other recommendations in thc traffic study involving
radius points on the Hainline Avenue access and stop signs at the daycare
driveway.
q. The developer will be required to obtain a permit from Ramsey County for work
within the right of way. This includes access points and utility connections.
r. Please show a berm between the pond and the eastern propcrty line with a 10 foot
wide top and elevation of at least 963.5. This is to maintain 2 feet clearance
between the floor elevation of the daycare and highwater level of the pond to
avoid potential flooding of the daycare.
s. Please revise control outlet structure to pond to include an overflow grate instead
of relying on the overland overflow which will flood the trail and cause erosion
problems.
t. Curb - show outfall gutter locations. We would prefer B6l8 except in outfall
gutter locations, where B612 is acceptable.
.
\\Earth\Planning\Planning Cases\2005\05-12 Arden Hills Office Park - Ro:ral Oaks Realty - PUD, Preliminary Plat for Old City Hal! & PW Site
(PENDING)\06-0l-04 PC Report Royal Oaks 05-12.doc
Page 13 of18
r'~,
( )
u. Please center roadway along the southern part of the project in the easement.
Consider tipping the road to the north and move CB I west, connect storm sewer
along the roadway to the west and into the parking lot. Another CB would be
needed at the parking lot entrance, which would connect to CB4. This would
eliminate the storm sewer that flows north from CB9 to the pond. Construct a
valley gutter or driveway apron at the daycare entrance to facilitate drainage.
v. Measure all road width face to face. Back to back dimensions do not jive with
face to face dimensions.
w. Is proposed trail/pathway easement vacation ok? This to be addressed by the
City.
x. Move wall along southern edge of the property so that all geogrid is located
within property.
y. It is the assumption that the owner of the property will be responsible for the
maintenance and repairs of all utilities (watermain, sanitary and storm including
all pipes, valves, hydrants, structures) drainage (ponds, rainwater gardens and
sediment traps) and roadway.
z. Please update plans to reflcct 42" RCP crossing Highway 96 instead of 24" RCP
storm sewer.
aa. Confirm watermain service on Highway 96.
bb. Please turn on utility pipe work on top survey sheet and show sanitary and water
pipes on storm sheet.
cc. Please provide detailed calculations on CB capacity, CB tributary areas, flow in
pipes, etc. May need to consider additional CB at CB6 due to the large tributary
area and shcet flow towards the structure.
dd. Use concrete pads for trash enclosures instead of bitmninous. Ensure all trash
enclosures are at high points.
ee. Please move hydrant along eastern property line away from geogrid area. May
consider bringing the watermain around to the rear of units 26-30 and then along
the eastern property line to the watermain tap at Highway 96. Storm sewer must
also be out of the geogrid (see comment u.).
ff. The face of the retain wall along eastern property must be at least 2 feet from
property line.
gg. Need a valve at western watermain connection.
hh. Attempt to average the sanitary sewer grade to avoid abrupt grade changes
throughout the sanitary sewer run where possible. This is aimed at avoiding
potential sedimentation.
11. Developcr must obtain proper Rice Creek Watershed District permits and
approval.
JJ. Developer must obtain approval from Ramsey County for access control to
Highway 96.
kk. Please revise and submit final plans to the City of Arden Hills for final approval.
Preliminarv Plat Review
.. '
.
.
\\Earth\Planning\Plallning Cases\2005\05~12 Arden Hills Oflice Park ~ Royal Oaks Realty PUD, Preliminary Plat for Old City Hall & PW Site .
(PFNDING)\06-01-04 PC Report Royal Oaks 05-12_doc
Page 14 of 18
, ,.
.
.
.
(')
, ,
j
lB.
Lots Size 1 Area. The minimum lot size for a single development in the NB district is
13,000 square feet with minimum lot dimensions of 100 feet by 130 feet. The proposed
development totals about 297,752 square feet with a lot depth of277.66 feet and a lot
width of 1072.90 feet. Lots for individual units range in size from about 2, I 00 square
feet to 2,800 square feet. The typical interior lot has dimensions of 32 feet by 70 feet.
The typical end lot has dimensions of 40 feet by 70 feet.
2B. Easements. City subdivision regulations require easements at least twelve (12) feet wide
centered on lot lines for utilities and shall be dedicated to the City. It should be noted
that the City will not assume responsibility for maintenance of these areas. Rather, the
easement would allow access if it is ever necessary to enter these areas. The plat should
indicate these easements.
In conjunction with the plat, the applicant should dedicate for public use those areas that
currently extend into existing right-of-way and streets. More specifically, the proposed
preliminary plat should dedicate to Ramsey County the portions of property that currently
extend into Highway 96 right of way. In addition, the applicant should dedicate the
pedestrian trail at the west side ofthe property. It appears that the applicant will dedicate
this pedestrian way, straighten out the trail, and will relocate the existing trail slightly to
the west.
The applicant may to grant the daycare center a cross access easement so that daycare
center traffic can legally utilize the development's Highway 96 access. Such easements
should be recorded with Ramsey County and a copy submitted to the City.
38.
Utilities. See the Plan Review Comments listed above for the City Engineer's comments
relative to utilities.
4B.
Park Dedication. Since this property is currently owned by the City, the park dedication
has been arranged through a purchase agreement between the City and the developer.
The purchase agreement lists a park dedication fee of $40,000.00.
Staff Recommendation
In Planning Case #05-12 staff recommends approval of the Master and Final Plmmed Unit and
Preliminary Plat subject to the following conditions:
I. The applicant shall submit revised plans, responsive to the comments from the Plan
Review Comments section of this report (14A), for review and approval by the City
Plmmer, City Engineer, and City Building Official, prior to issuance of building permits.
2. The applicant and their contractors shall work with the City Planner and City Forester to
save as many existing (and healthy) tree, as possible in the areas designated as landscape
space.
3. The applicant's timeline for development shall be as follows:
\\Earth\Planning\Planning Cases\2005\05-12 Arden Hills Office Park ~ Royal Oaks Realty - PUD, Preliminary Plat for Old City Hall & PW Site
(PENDING)\06-01-04 PC Report Royal Oaks 05-12.doc
Page 15 of 18
,<,-----..,.
( )
.. '
. Phase I: Summer 2005 - The developer may begin grading, installing utilities,
and construction of storm water improvements. It is expected that construction on .
3 buildings/16 units (presumably units 15-30), will also begin at this time. The 3
buildings/16 units are expected to be ready for occupancy by the Spring of2006.
. Phase 2: Summer 2006 - The developer expects to begin construction on the
remaining 4 buildings/14 units (presumably 1-14) with expected occupancy of
these units by the Spring of 2007.
Extensions beyond 2007 shall require application to the City Council for review and
approval. At the time of application for extensions, the City Council may include such
conditions of approval as they determine necessary for compliance with City Code.
4. 30 office condominium uses have been proposed for development on individual lots.
Only one business shall be permitted to occupy anyone lot within the development. It is
acceptable for one business to occupy more than one lot; however one business shall not
occupy more than six (6) units within the development.
5. In the event that retail uses replace the office uses proposed for development, such retail
uses as permitted through the Neighborhood Business District shall not occupy more than
30% of the units in the proposed development. The hours of such businesses shall
comply with Neighborhood Business District regulations for hours of operation.
6. Restaurants which are listed as special uses for the Neighborhood Business District shall
require a Special Use Permit and shall be required to follow the standard public hearing
and Special Use Permit process prior to occupying any space within the development.
7. Residential uses shall not be allowed to occupy any of the units in the proposed
development.
8. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plml for review and approval by the City .
Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. The revised landscape plan shall
include a mixture of coniferous and deciduous trees along the west buffer yard of the
development. The mixture of landscaping shall adequately screen the development from
the residential properties to the west.
9. A comprehensive sign plan shall be established to address signage within the
development and shall be included with the Planned Unit Development document. The
comprehensive sign plan will establish sign standards for all signage within the
development.
10. Revi8ed plans showing sidewalk connections, throughout the development and to the City
and County trail systems, shall be submitted to the City Planner and City Engineer for
review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits.
II. All mechanical operating equipment shall be screened to meet City regulations.
12. A revised lighting plan shall be submitted to the City Planner for review and approval
prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall include any accent lighting on
the buildings and also shall meet the City requirements for levels of illumination on
adjoining residential property. The applicmlt shall also furnish the City Planner with
lighting cut sheets for lighting fixtures proposed in the development.
13. Decorative painted fencing (like painted wrought iron fencing) shall be erected around
the pond at the northeast comer of the property to protect pedestrians from falling into the
pond.
\\Earth\Planning\Planning Cases\2005\05~ 12 Arden Hills Office Park - Royal Oaks Realty - PUD, Preliminary Plat for Old City Hall & PW Site .
(PENDING)\06-01-04 PC Report Royal Oaks 05-12.doc
Page 16 of 18
j or
.
.
.
/..,'~
( )
14. Execution of a POO Permit drafted by the City Attorney and approved by the City
Council prior to the issuance of a Building Permit.
15. Satisfaction of the park dedication requirements as approved by the City Council.
16. The applicant shall submit an application for a Final Plat within six (6) months following
City Council approval of the POO and Preliminary Plat.
17. The applicant shall obtain all necessary permits from the Rice Creek Water Shed District
and Ramsey County.
Options
I. Recommend approval as submitted.
2. Recommend approval with conditions.
3. Recommend denial with reasons for denial. If the City denies the petitioners request,
"...it must state in writing the reasons for the denial at the time it denies the request."
4. Table for additional information.
Deadline for Al!ency Actions - PUD
PUD - deadline July 15, 2005
The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on May 16, 2005
Pursuant to Minnesota State Statue, the City must act on this request by July IS, 2005 (60 days),
unless the city provides the petitioner with written reasons for and additional 60 day review
period. The City may with the petitioners' consent extend the review period beyond the 120
days.
Preliminarv Plat - deadline September 13, 2005
With regard to subdivision applications, Minnesota State Statute 462.358 Subd. 3B indicates the
following:
A subdivision application shall be preliminarily approved or disapproved within 120
days following delivery of an application completed in compliance with the municipal
ordinance by the applicant to the municipality, unless an extension of the review period
has been agreed to by the applicant.
This particular completed application was received on May 16, 2005. As a result, the application
must receive a preliminary approval or denial by September 13, 2005.
\\Earth\Planning.'J'lanlling Cascs\2005\05-l2 Arden Hills Office Park ~ Royal Oaks Realty - PUD, Preliminary Plat for Old City Ball & PW Site
(PFNf)fNG)\06-01~04 PC Report Royal Oaks 05-12.doc
Page 17 of 18
/' ,
I )
)
Attachments
4b-l
4b-2
4b-3
4b-4
4b-5
4b-6
Location Map and other pertinent maps
Plans and statement of request submitted by the applicant
Traffic Study submitted by the applicant
City Planner recommendation of impervious areas to eliminate in order to comply
with the Landscape Lot Area requirements.
Section 5H of the Zoning Ordinance: Special Requirements for the NB District
Letters from residents pertaining to this case.
-J, '
.
.
\\Earth\Planning\Planning Cases\2005\05-12 Arden Hills Office Park - Royal Oaks Realty ~ PUD, Preliminary Plat for Old City Hall & PW Site .
(PENDINO)\06~Ol-04 PC Report Royal Oaks 05-] 2.doc
Page 18 of 18
, ,
.
.
.
-~"-..
.f )
\, .
Planning Commission Meeting
June 1,2005
Attachment 4b - 1
/.~-.,
/
<1z
~
Q)
Q)
LL
o
o
o
N
o
o
o
~
0
0
l!)
II
.
~
Qj 0
ro
()
. (/)
(f)
:j c
5:: ,
~ 0
a a..
'8.",,- !!;
E);.::::22 --
~ I 3':2 ~ ~ I . m
~~~;1 m
~S I:;; ~ ~
. Qltl ~~ <3 0
Q '"~ !
N c
~<!:i8
j 0
~ "
....J
'"
o
o
'"
~... .g'a
....~:!~.gt!.~
~ <: ~!5<:- iil'~
"0 '" 0 <>,"'~"",,::l
E~~~~Zlij:g
~2~o~0E:
~i~~o~~~
8 ",o!s !::g'iOc
:~0'~~$~~
;;. g>Q.t"" 3.2: (;
~'Ei;$t3!!
~~~:~2!i1~~
I-- ~9~~~~
oj 8]: g,.~~ ~ '"
~a~~g:i'i?41
"," 0 "'~.9",,,:
~]E2a)ci~
~o_!J~~~g>"
~~g.gj~~g;,
0"''' ",,2 0.",.0
;~~~~~E~
~~~ ~~'~ ~ e
~_..c:!iI.E <>.-..0
!:~::d-"'~~
g'2~~$"i~..
<n:;; c(!).~.E Q)-W
~ ~~~.2~~~
~.!!!:2 <>..'0'; ~
~~g=15,~~~
"i-~f,lS-:i]2:''''al
~5"~'@@O~~
g 83'~~ ~oE:~~
~51g ~~~~~
i~:8~~i;3
"g~8~~~;.g~~
!il_!:lf0o~~Eo
;'~~2<::~f2<n
~~ E-:;;~:g g~ t!
.w2E~~]~..c:g
~~~~iOgE~r
_€~~:,~~i~~
~i~!!!lj~
~~~EL~~€i~
~~i~ ?~~~~
c:.
'"
:J
~
-"
Ql
"-
"-
'"
:2
Ql
'"
'"
m
(f)
C5
c
C
:J
o
o
>,
III
'"
E
'"
cr:
Qi
II
..
::s
o
Vl
~
.
~
"
M
.
T~~~~~
.:;;l{)X
".L """,
~ ~'~; ~
;:; I;;:; ~
G~~~~.
!
f"
\
~61'
jffl,l!;!'.,"
:" , .-
'! i'lj:
L .
o
r
I/J
Cl3
:J)
"-
<C
c..
Cl3
~
<,
"
"
Q)
u
,,-
.......,
o
z...............
..,"" "
<jz
.
~
Ql
Ql
l.L.
o
o
o
C\I
o
o
o
..-
o
o
o
..-
II
=
..-
OJ
CO
U
(J)
o
..-
01
o
o
N
<
.;g a "'00 o'2~
o:;;~~~8$?:
~~!i~-:?=o,~
"0 "'.0 ~::i""~:l
:s~~~~:2:i:E'
~'"~~~~.~~
~~~~~~~t
",~06g~~g,
~ g,~~ ~ ~ -~ ~
E-r~~[(E~[!
2~~<i2~.t~
1--_ :;~2~ ~ ~~
[m~W
~2E,'?2c..;el
\!! _ u OJ'" 1ll::J
o;.gf.~O ~ E~1
-<0" ",::J c:O -
0'" L '" 0 c.'" '"
~;:;~.o:g~~~
[I!m!t
...~~~1j~0E"
o 8eg,,, ,,"0>E. b
g,f~~~IE~g~
~~;::~~~--,~.g
~E.2'.g!'l- co'" C
8 ~ 8 :q,'g~1l ~ ~
~~ ilJ~C"?_O
2"'" (1;..... <::- .
i~~~~~:
mmm
i-
m
'"
.0
Q)
lL
0-
m
::;;
Q)
"'
m
lO
(f)
(')
>,
C
:3
o
U
>,
Q)
"'
E
m
0::
Qi
...
..
:>
o
VI
~
~~HILLS
Future Land Use Map
Figure 3.2
Legend
Future Land Use
CJ LDR: Low Density Residential
CJ MDR: Medium Density Residential
. - HDR: High Density Residential
- MR: Mixed Residential
- NB: Neighborhood Business
- COM: Commercial
~ MB: Mixed Business
~. >. ....,\"-
IND: Industrial
- PII: Public & Institutional
- Park
- Park Preserve
D Right-aI-Way
- Water
.
County Rd. D
Dis.-;I~imer
T/oeCO!11fJ"ihell.liVf'PltmD&'iiif'laIj,m.,re.
pre>emod"",hi'ff'.il{!col>"eSJ'C''<iKJr/o>Oty
(lIArdenMII.'Pol"Jj;!r1.","1L~",Mtu:(Jgm<'ll1
(,JI.eslio"..w"cemi,,~ ,he w"dUse Map
shouldl>ediow:tedm'heOt)-'ofArtJenHilh
u"Jd /J.<e fuigntlfio,", arc S"'Yrxllo cllaJlgc.
pleaserejerliJrlte("-O"'{""'h_,j""P!"',jtJr
""'''IJieJeLillrdUsefucripliQl1S.
N
+
;;.,LIt<<!
R1"""y~~",,1J'
"tYQrAn,,,,,].Jill<
2000
o
2000 Feet
.
M<lp Date April 13, 2004
.
.
.
,F-'.'
()
Planning Commission Meeting
June 1, 2005
Attachment 4b - 2
, ,
.
.
.
C)
ROYALI<?i~~
ARDEN HILLS OFFICE PARK DEVELOPMENT
Royal Oaks Realty, Inc. is proposing to construct office buildings on the old City Hall
site. The property is located on the south side of Highway 96 and a short distance west of
HamIine Avenue. The subject property consist of six separate parcels of land totaling
8.09 gross acres. The net area of the land, omitting the Highway 96 right of way, is 6.83
acres.
The easterly portion of the land is currently zoned N-B Neighborhood Business. The
westerly portion ofthe land is zoned Single Family Residential and is currently being
considered by the City of Arden Hills for N-B Neighborhood Business zoning.
The surrounding zoning is CC Civic Center District on the north side of Highway 96,
Single Family Residential to the west along Keithson Drive, R-3 Townhouse & Low
Density Multiple Density to the south(Arden Hills North Homes Association) and N-B
Neighborhood Business ( Children's World Learning Center) to the east along Hamline
Avenue.
This development proposal is for thirty office units (in seven separate buildings totaling
76,000 sq. ft.) to be constructed with a residential architectural design and appearance.
Like townhomes, each unit will be subdivided and platted with an underlying lot and sold
individually. The remaining property (lot 31) will be owned in common. All exterior
buildings and grounds will be governed and maintained by an Owners Association.
A Plmmed Unit Development (PUD) is being requested mainly for the purpose of platting
individual lots in the saine manner as a medium density residential townhome
development. A subdivision would not be necessary for one large officc building to be
constructed and leased. The PUD process also allows minor variations from the N-B
zoning standards which are addressed later in this narrative.
Access to the site is proposed to and from Highway 96 and Hamline Avenue. The
existing driveway from Highway 96, formerly used for City hall, will be improved and
used with right in right out movement only. A service drive will be constructed within an
existing easement on the south side of the Children's World Day Care facility allowing
full turning movement on and off Hamline Avenue. A traffic study has been done which
concludes that with some minor improvements, the existing roadway network can safely
accommodate the additional traffic to be generated with this development.
1000 County Road E West, Suite 150 . Shoreview, Minnesota 55126 . (651) 483-5518 . Fax (651) 483-5642
Wvvw. ray a loaksrea I ty. com
f )
.
[~
\ )
. '
.
The Arden Hills zoning code regulates the "density" of development within a N-B
neighborhood business zone in the three following ways; floor area ratio, lot coverage by
structures, and minimum landscape lot area. The Arden Hills Office Park development
exceeds each of these standards. The floor area ratio is 0.25 (0.7 max.), the building lot
coverage is 15.6% (35% max) and the landscape lot area is 40.2% (35% min). The City's
zoning ordinance also limits the maximum height of the building to 35 feet. The highest
height measurement taken from the lowest grade of a two story walkout building to the
average height between the eaves and the highest ridge of a gable roof is 31 feet.
Upon City approvals, our Company proposes to complete all necessary grading, install
utilities and construct all storm water management improvements in the summer months
of2005. We would then immediately begin the construction of sixteen units or three
buildings which would not be completed for occupancy until late winter or spring 2006.
The remaining 14 units, four buildings, would be constructed in the summer of2006.
The use of the PUD ordinance allows our Company to propose a single development plan
for the existing six separate parcels ofland. The Arden Hills Office Park plan will
conform to the spirit and intent of the Neighborhood Business zone. Minor modifications
to the N-B zoning include a reduced parking lot setback of 16.1 feet (20 ft. required)
along Highway 96. It is noted that there is also approximately another 45 feet of distance
to the curb line of Highway 96. Hence, the parking lot curb will be 61 feet from the curb
line of Highway 96. A second modification from the N-B standards is being requested for
signage. We are proposing a free standing sign of 120 sq. ft. identifYing the Arden Hills
Office Park. The N-B zone restricts a free standing sign to 60 square feet We believe this
modification is justified because the site now includes six separate parcels of land which
could each have free standing signs. This sign has also been carefully designed to match
the style and materials of the office buildings. We do agree to limit each of the thirty
units to 30 sq. ft. of wall signage. The free standing sign and proposed typical wall signs
are shown with the building elevations.
.
The exterior of the buildings will be constructed mainly of the following materials; glass
windows, brick (on all four sides), stucco on the upper gable roof ends, and wood
pillars/colurnns. Roof material will be a fiberglass shingle. Earth tone colors will be used.
The overall intent of the architectural design is to give the appearance of residential
"townhouse" look to the offices. Our Company has been involved in the plmming and/or
construction of similar developments in the Cities of Little Canada, Vadnais Heights,
Stillwater, Eden Prairie, and Lakeville. Like other sites, this is an excellent "transition"
land use for vacant land along highly traveled roads like Highway 96 and nearby adjacent
residential properties.
.
. .
.
.
.
(.) r)
ROYALilOAKS
..... REALTY INC.
April 4, 2005
Scott Clark
Community Development Director
City of Arden Hills
1245 Highway 96
Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112
RE: Old City Hall Site
Dear Mr. Clark;
Today I am submitting our application and plans for the development of the old City hall
site on Highway 96. We are proposing to construct 30 office/townhome units which
would be sold separately to individual businesses. The individual thirty units total
approximately 76,000 square feet of gross office space. Depending upon the unit design
(i.e. rambler vs. rambler with basement walkout vs. two story units) each one will consist
of 1600 to 4200 square feet of gross floor area. Like a residential townhouse area each
unit would be sold independently and governed by an Association. We have named the
development The Arden Hills Office Park.
We look forward to your review and our approval process with the Planning Commission
and City Council.
Yours truly,
~~-
Royal Oaks Realty, Inc.
Marcel Eibensteiner, President
1000 County Road E West, Suite 150. Shorcview, Minnesota 55126. (651) 483.5518. Fax (651) 483.5642
www.royaloaksrealty.com
.
" ~
~ ~
~?
, ""/ ,In. "/ ,~. Nil (4 ,,, ,,_ NWJj4 01
5.c. n r"D JC,Rn'llJ
m;
m
! ~i
g ~;;
~ ~ ~
~n
I ~':
"" ,~ ,
ii1
~' ~~
0,
~ tl
'---1---_ _
, , '
,
~ ~ ':~
~.~ ';;.
::;,~ ~
if; ~
~,Bi~
g~~
fo'2.
rH
,
,
: I'~
g ~
~
~
c
;
:~~".:..-
.-
; "~~
I
1
" ,
... (f -1--< ~_"
C '" <::>0 00
",'~:P!i!:;: :;
:Vi'::rrr:
~?l ~~!;i Q ;:
r1n,"'" >-;p- .....
z z "'",...,... -c:
:;g~:'~ ~
~~~~~~:5
",< c: Z Z 0
~~~~: f,J S3
r"1",~~e5 II (.fJ
~8~~~~.~ ~
~2,,~~~ ;:;
!i!iW
~'O
'"
@~
f,~
"~
B~
-
,--' -]
,~
~I:' "
~~' '--
Jl '--
,
,
,
'~
,
'" I
'" I
;:! I
,
I
T__
I J-__
,/~;J
if .~i
:J
I
-_ .J
I<~:~
II.':
/:~~
I ~,'.;
!!l"
~ ~ j1~1
,I ~'::I
It;;>;; }~
i I ~;;
" I ~r\":; I .~-
>i',~,
~ -<:~:+ .!I'{c'
I ~:'" ,I.
A '. ;t;J'i < ~/ ' .
V.........., .... ....:. ~, .;
1" 'IH le--;l".,
-J:@ :'j,JJ ;0' :"\; @~FJ~M J .;
" " 1" ," ", 1" "",.:t R '" l /I~~:I
i! Ie ' t ' " I ~ ';,t;' ';;;. 'f - I ~~"~,~
j.~~.!~.t1Ijl"''';).: ~~.~~\~ [Jj I, ~~.'. 'c
7 '. ,; ....,., >t I '.,.....
, ' /1'1 .' -::c.
------~~ (, >-x: rille..' H' t ;i
- '" ......1~~~. ~1:111;<I;;t~ ~m! I
"Fc~~~i~~ _~~,~-c ~ =c\; I il'
F::":;''.--,- '. ",I', ' fnnm ",,_,m';'1
;"'..'. ::::'. '""'~ I "''''",''' - ~ II!: ..,::, [ /:
::'-;j, ,,!:':;", :,:'~ ~"-e-::"~Q~''':;) 1 ~i g%;g ',11 I .
. .... . "",Ie,:; i;!> ~ i): 1 I
..'.... ;;.. ~ 'I ~.,~"':(") :1: !~ i 'i: I' IF
,~.,I ~t..!~;: _~ ... (O..~ I " ~ Ih,;{
n"'_,,""j~:.' ',,".. I:, ~ '::\1
I... ~i,.~iJi>g@ }:~1'~:,;~:~~,:,;::~:~)rn '.,1" ~tJ
->.:'; . ~', ~u~lf:"~~;,:,",;;,~t I
\'.', - 271.47 0 ._:;",;:,~,
I-- I, ., 328.47 "....' .
~ 0-4 . -~ f-~ ~ -, E i SOO"J6'09"E ~ :1 "i:,:\:"i/::-_ .,.:.
' . _~ I \ i< g?; j' .:
: :1 i I ,w,~ H 1[1'
: ~ '", I ;:,,~ \ I ' :1'
.. I ~ 1;1 I ~I ~ ~ '~[ I ',~
>-<':; r'l....!:S!:. 1,"lK
" '. ..' ~ ..', f' I
'~''''"'H >- ~::.lr-'/" I L ,,--,,,,,,,.,,--,-1-,, 13 '-'i',
~ '":;1 ",,-.' " '" s: I
~, ~'":. -- l-~.~ _ ' . <.: -" A I - i .,
,H ";;:,,,". ,,..j -.Tlpl ~".I 0., I' l.R'
";L" ~: ,i;/ :: p< I, I ) I~j,
liJ~. ~;-"" ,,~f$"Q~ ![! : 1::':- 1-' , 1':'::'.:: ''-':: .~~~'Io,":::_,: / I~ .I;i:
G~ ;~I l5,o~ l ":::l~~
e-".m.-- _-.,.---,..'. ,,,. ... ':.~._,..._.d-.._.,.~-----t!_-- .........11:
_ _ __ _ _ _. n__n l:- ~ L>~~~:.;;I:,EE,'~E~~;l~<:;,::;;~;~;;~:~~i!~~<1J
c'
n
n
~
o
"
.- ...- _.,-- ~
I : ~:
, I
II
il
, ;:l
U
d
~ ~
a a
~: f1
<::J ~ ~
~"." - ,
~ ~ I!::'
~ 2 ~
~ '" ,.. '2
~ ~ ~I?
" ?,
~
~--
q ~
" "
a ~
~ ~
I ~
!
I ~::!;:
6 Si~
o 3:~
s S r;
'" :,,::r,
~ ~ ~
, 0
~ ~ ~
'" ~
---._-
~, ",<,
'f ~_..;L..
9 ~
\~...
-- 't~.'.,
,~.:.., '\
\i;; .',
\~'::~
"';r:r;
.--:-'-110<
.1 ,;-
'I =__
-!- OJ"
~I: :
1 I jli ii'
....!.;. 1_.'.,-.'.'.: J -~,; ,.}<'" ;'. \
.U' .;,;' 'h,~j~r
- ~~~- \J';... j~ /:>.",::
-',0.", Q ,''i
"",."""""
'.~"'P"L~.
':''''''0
\,..' , \
\~~. i \
\ ~,.
'^. ",.c,.', .
\ .,,;; 1 ,~, \.
\ ',\
.-
a I'..'
a ,.,"
~\~~,
I~~ 1 i
.2 ir'
t I'
" I
~~~
f;~
;li
~U
~n
I: ~
o ~ ,
I GI .",@]
.;;},,~,", ,\,,:.~
~1'I~ " :! h
~i'i r ~ ,,~:~ 11
I - /
, "
~
~
>t.
'[
,
l
'I ,^v,,".fi'~"'l
a
,
~ \~J".'!";
,
l'..s~~".,'.'f\
I?"",~"
F'
,
"
,.;4'
'Q"i"
..~ 10\
~~~IG'
n-
,z~
fI:l(; ...
ma~
wt-m _
. fi
! .
t
H
I
,.
i ~ ~ ~ "
'. .
I,'''''
'",'.~~..~;"."
I %~..
...
'.
, ,
.-----'
,",,;;';4
,:tl';'."~
,
in. ':,
J~l
,
I ~ , I
I'''' I
,
,
,
1_--- --
:.:.
..1
,
,
,
..,
.
:1,.
" ,.
i
: --:-
,
'"
In
I />~
I"'
I"'~
,h
"
~~~2iijJ1 '
-<,.:~~
'.'00, I
,.., ..
g~~'i!" '<'. ~gl ~
"I ~e~ \J\~'.
~~~ , w::<<:~ ":'1
::32866 <- '<,
'.
In
I r, " i'",i>
: ,"\ Il"f\"
I 'S2" ,I",
,~'l', .,
!! t ':~PEDE61R1AN WA yl ' :
,
ni
;""'1
F~:
~ii
NOO"3S'24"W
~n~~'
-,_.:;' ,x
'.
."
:s.:5~
~"}::
1 ~~.
~~:
-'...~
~ t--lo,
~ ."" ~
~)o;~
~?>;:
&<::-'-
,.
, .
~5
~ ~
~Q
e~
~~
~, '"
~ -
~o
i; I'
~.. 'f ;~ 1I':::p
j'l I 1'"' )"'"
.'~
1-------,-----,J:c1rl I I
-m, i ",G ~J;-4? "
.:
....
...:o,
:,'
,',,':s:/i'
,
1--
^ ,
~ I ~I~]L t
---.,-0..'
-'-*
1!ii'
'1:,,):,
11,1
1--
j ,,"-
l~1
~
......,'2;'\
1 ""-0'_ ,
-,,,
-lO(.;')
~ - -\O,~
1
!
,\:~;;;';;
,
.
,
<.
~!
ii,
,
,
I
I
I
I
I, '
" ,
---.05---~--,..n~~"l
.
,
!.
I
I
I
,
,
,
:
I
,
:
. :
i:
I
,
.e
,
,
,
I
I
I
I
,
,
,
,
"
i:
-I(P(j)",~
J!!IC&O
11I~iit~~
,,1~uIEr
G'''-",mO
\)1-"'(1)
C:W -I]>
. 7'\
-to- '. () (j)
(p -, 0
\"Z C~
\P \)1 Z m
\)1\)1 -I]>
iji..., ---<r
()" J{J-I
0---<
]>
Q
(;1)
~IU
tt1
r
::I
Z
l>
IU,
-c
11
r
l>
-I
-I\\-
i
(J)
-I
tt1
1)
r
l>
Z
s
o
TI
S
l>
IU
o
tt1
Z
Is I
~r
!~ r
II;; (J)
id
',~ 0
IG: -n
-n
()
tt1
1)
l>
IU
7\
..
I.......
.'. .
,..':'.
I
/
I
,
'.
.'.,
1< '
~;(:: :
;".. .
I II II
;:::z~cn;t;j ~::;]
~~>~OOlI I I I g:>JD
~j:;:;1r~;"'N_N~:O~~ rn
'-"~3ljl8~::::'::l~':l~"'8l.:l
q P~I6~~il'iljl:il~~N ~
l.l::.-^';j'-"Z-<-<-<""" go~
. "-'~~:!$:~~~~~ Pi~ t--
I )>:c :>>i5j;OO:<=< ~;;) 0
~:n~AlCinc:c:u II zi ~
p-<)>;,; ~~ ~ 0> .....2. ':<"
c:: z ~ ~ --{.....o II ['] ;a
29 A; II ~o,;; -~:Z
~~~ ~;:l~~~ ~~--1
::c -:... ~~ ,,::>:lZ ;tl;tl r:;l
~-:::~ .9;n;2~ ~:s ~
~"I.. ::s~~c:~ 08::-i
-< ~,g "'2: (J!;j~ 'il::'.l;
a~:'" c('\;jf)tfl ?;!<l iZ
:.,::t': i!~ f;~ r"1~ eI
0>1f~ ~g~ ~ln >
<:"'''' -p.ln ;:;j
::<~ ~ g: ~
II ,... ~ ~ '" en
.~~~ ~ p
'" _. ~ :-l
~~ [;1 ~
IT;, 17:
p~ Vl
" ,
~~i~
~ -!t:...
2~~6 I
U,',
;:; ~&~ ~
~ ~8if:
-<-<::j- -
~ ~,...~ f;!
Ol"OI~-<g
aaJj~
~s;2~
:~!~~
;;~~;g
~~<. .
'iit~t~ !;;
""" "l3
~~Q~
8 ~~~ '
~ .""." ,.
, "l~:
: ~"Q'"
'H
"00
,
,.(;":''''-'"'01
.~:" t.eQO
"J.;''''.Y(0/
~Q.~ /(:20/.()
'"00
I.
"
8
rU1
,
,
k "_01
--j
',;,'
"';~,
:c-
..j
--j
',.
(:!;] i
....--.'.. :
~ '..' i
" :
:,'.".
......
.. .!
_,c.-, :,' :
.. ' I
I...... i
..... l
I..'.' :
,
..... l
:.. :
.:". ,
:<.
..
.;.
.:.c.:..,....
"~ . '.
.:,....
00
~
~>
g: ~~ ~"~~l ;;
~~ ~~ g "
S~ -"", ~ 'o,gE
~~~~~...,1.J:
~S! ~~;:: j" '.sJ
'" ~ ~'O
~~ ~i -.:::
~: ~~ u. '
.,. "1, bli g :,~)
~~ ~~ -
'0'" "'i= ."
&~ ~'^
..,,~
"
"
, S
"
"
"
"
"
"
-l
>
F
! l5:.'
o
~
e
~~ ,~~
el
,
,
g
~
..,
'"
"
w
.~ g
z
()
;u,"'=----,,-~;__;.-~
...
I
c,
~ ~ ~
o C 0
M ,,," M
,~ c, ",
i;j - Q
Ai ~ ~
C,;;: "
'0" "
S ~ ,_
,
.~-~f"-i'~,[,',
",' ',',<'
;-- + .:~;
i; I i'ii:
-L ',,'
I,
'I : !~i~
i I:; I~
11 Ii,;
jl_iIll
'::i I'"
J\
01"1'
r" ~[/J
-to. ~,:
, 5'~_
o '
"
~
w
I
I
,
it
I~..t:
.n~ 6.
ml~
3.lJlo ..
U~ ~
~~~
~Q7 .
:"111 _
i ~
.
" ,
lHU!!limr
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ ;;!;,
" ~ ~
~ ~ ~
j ~ ~
P'~
~ ~
"'
,<
~,~
~
,.
j
j
,
I
~ ~ ~':
~ -'"S-i\'
~ i~,~
::: p ~
ifi
~ !~ ~
'I
! 1
u
"
o
~
Q
~
o
~
Q
"'
"
"
g
o
,
o
~
o
~ hi
Gl
2l m
, z
,0
,
,
~
a
a
5
~
~
<
~
,
Q
,
f
'" I~
Q m
o 3 m
,0
~ ~ ~
[ ~
'.'
.i.'
r"-.-
\".,,, "I
.,,~ .:r:/""
:'$.0 . .,:t-z.'-: \
t~!. ~~i~'~ \~ ~ \
~"li'? ....~~ \
-,<~~""".:,:>,. ,
0, 3 Q-
PH
~ >::..;;
: 1 [
co ~~
~ ~ ~
~;,
~ ~g
~\ ~
~e:~:>~':\ \ '~
O:~ ,~ -~,-,-~,
i -~~ I J',J ~~~~.
I
I i/'--
,--"" B~
-"1~ e:::~
~. -
~ ~:
~;j ~~j
11'.1
:', ,'~:~'--<~1~; .1
I if' g::::.~:2 ~_.
I I f5' ~o:r ~~~~~
I "",,,,,, ,.- ~ ;: ,..3
I ," ^it, '" ~
I,~, I .' h. ;:;
_ I -,t,t 1 ~ ~,t11
-.J j\~1 a~c'~~.
~~
I;,~------
~--I\'-." do_ 01 "" Nfl;' or '." /{Wl/4 of
s.~ 12. T~p, JG, i?r~ 2J
~~
'"
i\
\
'"
i,t
,
J''''','"7~~
""0.::.,,..-- ;\
.p.- -
~l
',",
I~ -_
T
,
,
," r ~ ,;
C.._ ___1_
c__
,
,
c.
~t
,
cO
n
~
~
,
o
"
"'s~
Ij,"~
,
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
- ,:.l'
.~. f"
',~'
, "
1 ~~
, a:~
\]..2
,
I,,' "-
I ,~.' I ",,-
. 1.-__ 4-
- ~)~
-r.....--'----
I,,) I
II ;~; I,
1'-' I
...,
I
,- -
,
~----- -- _!-~
1 '~uIPII;:1
I IbUIl<l'Si.
"," . "," ~~IC ';~
" I ~ , I 1~ I
I I I~' \ " '
_ ~l,__ _,_ .~1,____1~
I
I
,
,
, ..
,
,
I
,
I
,
,.
,
--~t
-i~
~~
~t
A<~f~ ""1
9,',-, f."
"
';;~
,
\
~"
_. -"\- -~ -\ (lO"?"":~.. ~ i~
\D~ \""11""" f~~~,,::'
, 1
\ - "S ."
,m\i, ~'
,- \\,';. '\
\ \l~<~ '("
\ . ~~j;.
_'_ 0" '\ - .;:~
,
c.
,
,- .
::'~I*.s
<:;;
.~,~~---..-~-."-,.._--<^.
'~\
..
'"
~
'"
~
"
,-
,,'
$
~~
,
\
l't, t-;
\' ~,
,"
~-!,
"~
.0
i!
,.
!j-
0.-:;
'.'~" "'.
',,, '
~~,
,- ~~~;,
~ .,.
'i'J,
\:'
,
,
.~~
I
IJj
;\.-
I
1 1 ;,..
~~ t;. ~~i ~\~,-\\
L.~I~.'-=-=--'_ .=." _ ~~--:-::::-~----;-::-!....----=.-,A _ _-~!t":_ ..J'o_
.t 1 i ,~P.o..I"o" ~or"woy <Q...-n."j p.,~.
~', :,:"; " 000. OQ <257258 r!~ 00 "",olod) '.
1.______J_________ i_
~
~~
9,~
"
I
,
J;
>;~
i~
\~
,
,'.'.
~
\
<i;,~
~~
'"'~
. ;~YJ' "",
j "
i i ~f~' ,
i! ""I" i.. f"
'" ~ ,: ':.~." ,(,'.
~ ~6 i 2~,~\
~t.l,{ -
~~ t\""\:' ~\
~L
'i
.-~
\
~
.,
"
~~~
\
,
~\
..~
,
t,
~~.
~-a
'.
~~
.,
~ "-
,,'
\
~
,
,~
~
,
\\
-'
~-j.
, ~
'\,0
"{;f-
~
',<so
"-;;.-p
....oc.-
t..\,.s>
'1.::;/ 1-
\
\
,~
-{~
't
,
I;~
"\
\
"
,
~l
j/
I,
t~ 177,~"}
SOO'3i:i'09"E
::'1, .
~,<:j. '!o1: ~~
9. \i.~~
,
it
\I.'t
1,
il-_J>Q_~
I '
,
I
~y
,- i
~~: ~ J ;~}~'\ \
,,; I '~. B
ii,"tl.~~; "I
~ '
I ~ I "l<""1 _,,'
I ..,r I ,;""~-)'
I ,. I .il"
,,'_':t,. 1'\ ,lc....,
-,~ril-{.\ r,.,1~t~
"\1 ~'t" 't~\ -.r'f..
'I 4" .';t~ I ~,' :-: $.'
I~.b .>i-I $- " ';1._ ~ ".'l";~",-'.-".
_ ~~"''''I jr,;:~">:L_:,; ':~~-;..
:..>-'1 I 'J'i:':'-,I::,,,,,\~\'
~ ~ ~,o - .' ~ fll.~~~:
'i\ I 'S~:,: - " r~ l '
'" I --.~ \. (~:~ t?~~.
"
,
.-
o
,
~
n
,
~
n
,
c'
., -...~{ :
#("j:>
~
~
~.
,
;\~~
~"".... ,." ',.
jt~,nn"
\
_:;'i..
c~:...
~
......~"'.
,;,,'
-~'''.
..1>,1,1.\'-_'"
. )i :~ft't!\.
-~::....
'. . .
~\h:~.;::i/'.HU;''': .
- NOO'~'f09:;W
i
,
."
i\
'.. ~\
, ~
. ~ao".
,
,
,.
-',
'~
~\
",
\
328.47
[
"'ij'
i:
"
'!:r
<.
d_
~~
~,
,..,!
~..
\.
,
~~
-e.
11'\ "II
:1
;,
~
~,
"II OJ
o
;uO
,. c
iil!f~(};U Z
~O--J(}QO
p;Um(}l>l>
cr:~~:ftr ~
\)lm "'<p 0 -{
C:.C --J ~
~::I 8<p-A>-
"'z c;U
u,\)l zmlt
\)l\)l --J l> "
("pI-,) -<rlJ
()' IU--J
o -< 0
g "
m ~
l>
lJ
I
()
(J)
C
~
'<
m
-{
05--------:..:..
I
1",
,
,
,I
".1'
~.'
~
~'S80
c
"
~
.",.t
I
>"
z
Cl
JJ =---"s_~h----
....
I
,
"
"
'"
'.Ii
is
n
5~
~
.~ ~
~
CO
'-
c
.
'.','".''''"'''''''''''^'''''_H''''''''''''''",.''''''''''''''''".''' """'h ."
E!lq;;;
l~ ,
! '~~
:;.1
,I ..
'1
" ;=
'I ~
'I ~
J
, ~ {l
I; "
I:
"
I'
il
;JJ
, Cl
'I:,,,~
,"<;;r--;:;
~. '" ''I
"1:;,.tJ1
~ t;J ~
~ , "
,,'!;
;:; ~ s:..
br!!
, " "'
~ '<: ~
(."'~
~ C'j
~
o
'"'
'-1
~
~
CO
~
~
.
,
o
"
,~
,
'i'
~
'I p,
M 1 ~ ~. ~
l,,;."~m
~1! d?
"''''[ "-
i~~ H;
I".JI~ ~~;
~ ~ ~ ~
rj' m
,~i 'I f ~:
i ~~'
.,
,
co
"
, ,.
."
cc
is
CO
. CO
" ~
~
,
~
- ~
" " ~
'1- L'j '2l :u~
e:;:::t:c::, 0..
~ ~()-<
.':1~C) f:
~r'il~ 0
v,,~~ :Do
;:~~@
& ~~:o
'"~"v, .,~ m
.I.~' :P
L~; "-':':'1 ~
_;0-,:;;.;-<
Cr;, ~
~
~
C.ll<;o
:r: ';i.
i'n ~~
---< ,~
~
&
H l! 1 \ il
'. I \'\1 n
1 r"1
'----~;\ ::~I
iC~\"" \ ~\
I 4J1'- n: '.IIIlIl;c
J I ""I~HJ fl~L',tjlr
! ~-I 1;!;!I't11'!;!
-~ 'll;j'".."!'
1.'1.,1,
p
I
o
,
/11
r: I"
,1'\ ' 11 '
~! 'i~~)
~"
,
"
"
<
:r~ \ CJ
,!\ i/ 1---.-,
~ \ l i~; . 1
'\. ~
;.; r---
/ r---
'...~,..
"' , '0 "
~";;i)1-;~-;:~i ~l:~
1m!;!,!! !II !lI
;8~~~;~~~ ;;, 0
~,: ~ ~~ ~~~~ ~i 9?
.'I""!' I' 2
n"", I 'I
~!1 ;';~::l ~~ ~ ~~ ('J
9~ ~ !~ ~'~ ~:~ ~
o~~ ji~ ! i~~ 11
~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ at: ()
!~:~~~.~~ .-
~ ~ ~~: ~ ~~ ~
~ ~ : ~~ ~ U n1
~ ~ > ~Q ~ ~~ CP
,. I' '11
R ~ ~ I:
" ..
s
fll
---1
r---
:b~
"
o
"
^
"
D
Z
"
..,
"
c
"
..,
s
z
'"
z
..,
"
"
z
"
'"
c Ir.! I,: ~~'\=\ ! ll!lU!I"'~],
. . ~ ..1 I .,,",',
g. ,;ll."~ i'" " "11
r'1 ,~ -s.,ll~" 1 TJ~1 '_";-.,,,, 1 ~
,; . 1 / I \ IJl \. . l ".',i&# ~#4t i
i:~ ili 1 !,~, I, L)~j:"
r ! ,; I'" 1(, !!! '!~
~ . ,:" el, 1,',
~ "t! \ ~ nn II~ I~!,:
~ ..i _L " Ii '~! ~
, ,
: I
I ! ,;1.".
IC-~' '\ "~-J' !i!i:! Ii
~~: : \\IU I. '.'~ ,W I, )1
~~ L. ~\~. \ .' I' Till: ~.' ", c,
~:f I 1'>- ,. 'il ~ ..."
i!i 1i ~.I'\t: 'Lni, ".".
~ I~N' d'd:i3i
.11 \ , i'lll III hj.! );j,
.j~'l! '.i!.
, I
1 I
N:::::'OlO(JJ---..Jo-,(J1~G-J.N~
TTTTTT:-:TI~~
Yini;Qi:
~?ii2?i?i?i?~i?:? ~~
~63~~~55g~~s-
~[~~;]*~~~~~~
-:?~:'(J!:;l~C~~~~ :::?'?
~]~~~~~~;~~~
fn en ",cC\O\O'-'J <to:leD <ll:l
Qo.D.:J)<Vllf)o..g 0 0..0
~t~o8:g-g.g1 g~-
O-~:J3<Tl;:-~'-o 0:J0
:1 2'- 33~: ~ gg.
;: g (~~ Q ., is
~: ~ J ~ ~
:;: 'E: :J 0
S. :;J
"1 "-,,.. ::z" ~ 8 ~ g
h~"'~W ~~"' ",,~Gl ~'i:... ~~
8,,~~ '<~ i;";@:;iPli"'~<;~~ b'; ~~;~
g~~2 ~d ~~~; gp :}~~ tl~~~;' :~~~
AS...&: "," ;oll- ;::;2 ~oJ fir'" ~~ ~~
~~~ ~~ [1 ,.~, i ;~~ %~_ ~~, ~;~;
" 0", ~ .. ~ ,,~
5~g"~ ~J~' ~ ~ ~ "-i ~;; ~""
~:~ ~s 0 i ~ [i, ~ E ~i ~'~ [
""'0 <e::i &a ~ -,,, ... II ~_
~e:1O~" 3. ~ ~,- 0 .~ i5h!~~
~i~ f~ ~~ u * ~; " ~l~i~~;
~j~ ~s ~ ~ i ~ U ~:~[1~~-
n" ~ i - ~ it !!,i" H...~.,' t,,!,,
~,~i 1.1; in i! !: ;i1'
"'~ ;: i.' "H~;
:;j~a -'1 Ii n '< "~
;~ "'';,) !
f'~! ~~
~~!.Ij
'1.g "
r-
III
o
I'l
Z
o
~~~
"'0:;'
:~
""
,~~
"
R'
'l
'-
,,;,0
~5
0'
"
a~
od
~~
~~
:,
1\
"
".
'/
!I.!'~' I
,:.,1'(1
"I~' X;l
~
'"
II
""',~~l~1 I
" . ~ 9, I.
. .'.; , " ,,; I I
~i li.I,lf I
\ r~;flG I \
-:\~ ~I~~ \\l
\, "~~! \
~~
I \
i \
I
II
" 1
j" ! '. ~'!
:"
~i
~"
'\
"",.
0,
f "-
~i'
,
".' ~\
Jt~" ;
, r,:'
. i i\ l.i
, j (~
~.
\. j "~,
i\
~~
riff' 'Ii
;:.~,l, rl,' , ~,
".,.,.'j,. ,,"
" .', .-1
,~ 'r
l~ 1
.., 1 \
1\1'\ IL
I i
'1:, \ I" t",..! ,7,
i,,: 1:(~
-~-,l!. \
"' <t\ I
~! r~1
U"' I~ -;
~;I I~: r
L-"i'" ~ '
, I~,~~'
l1 ~'
'i .'.
~..
.~.~
'., 1'\
i'l
I
I
-~
i
:i:
,
r.~~
~~
'-i\
I
}1
i~
. ,
,
1
,
1
I
I
i~
I.
I
ii'
'"
I":
~: to';:' /~,
. "I'-'\'
II :1 I
I i ~ .' I
\:; 1
.' I
" .' ~
" J
~.. I
i;,". '. ~ \
;~. , "' I
.~ '< \ ; : ; :
~ I I ': ,
'1,'.. .
, -'.- ," ~'I
( I ~
~) ~: J'
\, ,~~ ~~
.1' ~" 1;~
/1 i....r
:0 I
: ~ '6.\,:0<
, ,>
pi .,,1
~~~\ ""
~~ ~;\
\ h \
1l,.
l,~
,
.
-
MAGNETIC
@/'~
-,
-u
::IJ
m
r
~
Z
:l>
)>~
::0 c> "
o ::IJ'-
me5
:l>ZZ
::IJ c>
OI~
m-O
Zr::IJ
Ir:l>
-(f)Z
r :l>
G;oc>
~ m
:5:1l:l>
Zlle
-
om
m~
(J)
-00
)>Z
::00
^~
-I
::IJ
o
r
-0....)
r
:l>
Z
~!
, ~
!H ~
1
<
o
z
:;!
5:
:to-
\)
"I
'I
,
~~i
".,,"""~
Id"''''''''''
"."O.Y
. . ,,","",
"""",,,,,,--,-,,,,<,.,;.,,,,,,,.
~
,:JJ
a ~
" :;;
~"~ ,
~ ~ ''I C)
~;; ~
~! ~
'l-c::i~
; ~ ffi
~ ~ ~
~ t-; <:
t:i ,C'j
~
<:)
.!:c
"
~
~
w
~ I ~; ,
,~ ~ .', "
. n~
'f ';<;
'h l~%
f~, ~ ~: ~
~Ie' ,,~
(.~ :~i
~i~~1it
, ~ ~"
.; ~ ~
<,; -, -, ~
'.j :,' d, ~
"I h;
i ~ <i
,
, ~
"
';:1
"
~
~
~
) ~8 J'J~
ti:r_C2l 0
~Q -<
~~" :P
~~ r
--'ifj~ 0
Gi_~:j }>
~, 'A
'--'t.::tJ(J)
4>.. <2:I1
~ l.~G ~
I,r .....
fJ] r:.;!'I Cj
:::'; 0,::;:0: -<
Do ~,
:.1)
,
rJ 'i, ~
~, ,~
l\:~~
I \J "
H
I 1 111
fuR' I, 1 I,it, I-~
II" '
, ,
~
,
~
~
_ i ~ '1, ~ I =, i I
,-= ~ '1 'I'
~---'t:l ._'.
,~ ~i; ,
~'L-
= -+- ~ =1:--=
~ =l=
r l~
I
j
v
Q
C
~
:Jo,.
r-
r-
,G)
c:::
-----I
M
:::0
[ I
'Ii (WjJJJJI
UIIII',llnJ
~l
) I
=r---,/ )1
I
H "", .,.
',----./
r-
Q
C)
b-
::::j
Q
2:
U)
(
,
,.
,\,,'-
e
""F
"
'"
~
n
w
.n
, ;:
8:.
~
\
~~~r.D0l-"1Q"l1ll-:::~~":::::' ~
TITTTi;i I ! c;J
v-v::;-V!i:<Ollll :rl
I1I1 II' "I, z
COCO;?;? 0
oC'oo~~9i~~-'j:;J6
(Cr\lO~:=I:::>-ocoo......
;65S.S.S-~(;<;rb~~
;;;;:r~~~Ul(/l")(I] 0
[J) VI .n rTJrr1rr1I"'1~ ~~' =?~.
LJ ~ =? x ~.~.~. 0 .... '" -fj n
0-;58~. :::L~c:-.-g;;;5 8 g:
"OOOS.3:J:::l(l]:;Jc:::ru::J
~ ~ ~lCl'OlQ<C [~(") n. 0
~o_Q.~~g'-l:?V) g g__
~Z'~~~?:S-s. o?.S?
Q i1:~ ~ =3 3 ~ ~ ';; g @.
J::o o'<::!~ '0
~. ~ S. ~~ &. ~ ~
:;l (j1 =E 0 :::.
(t. <1l :::> 0
;.: --':::l
rn
'i'; Ii " "1 ,"";! ,,;! ~I 'I:!H
!:I, 'l 'lH";;!!I 'll!_?!!!,!.
a ~<1 ;:" ""~" :::g g... . j":C i.;~. !!oj!,'"
('l,~,~~~:,; HI'- ~::: ~t" "l~ ~il."l~h~
':', " [1"! ~,,' :"~" i,
~~g~~ h! ~~ ~ a ?~lff!~l
~" ".J I . " !, ""1',
:2 C> '" -<b ,,- ~ il. f 5' . :l- a ~ j _ ~ e
:;:8 ~=ii S~. ~.. I ,h ~-. ~!l. f
',n """ ~ l ~ OJ' "",.
"~~~ii:~ jIl1ilt ~~.o.iI"!!.~
~::3:o y~ .;;- 1 !" 0; I":~' BTi~ ~
Ii!!, ; 1 1', ;1 i:1m'
'":~ ~S! !. ~ i: [~ !! :~i"-!i.~
"'~:: <!l,.. ~ . to>;, 5' ~,ghl.~
~R~ ~~ -I ~ ~i i' 1~ [~ h~~
9:0" o~ 0" ~"" _ ,D ~... . ih
'"h, " "~ " "' '",
~ll~ '"", "1 ! ~. .P ~ ];"H
:;;.~ ~,;) i. ~ ~,' ~ 5' ~ !
;h ~,'1 ~ i.
,I; 'g
,,~~ 8~
Pili",
~~~ ~~
~!~ ~~
~,q i'
,
I
1
,
<:.xxxxxx
~'-l
~';
(1,:::
"
g"
:'5"
'L
,
.~
-.'l
~
c_
~
1
'~"
..
" 1
1"1
" 1
.J
'-'-~-._-
-.
-
JlAGNETJC
~~~
,
! ~
/i~ I~I II
, I'l I
, ; ! ll~
J" ,JI',~: j lj'\!l I
'''''or' : ':f I
,ii;~m~I~\i,I~'i;1 ! \
I ~i \
I 11 li!!1 \
" 'Ill ~ !l;
I,,;;,!
I ""
'I ~~"
_.l
'~l ~I illl
j, II 1
, , '''d II;j I
'" ~~~ ~ 'I ~I'i
....~F:I "';::8 ~ ~~
~i.,,, ~~ ~ '" I~i
i!i==r::: ~ _ 11 :' 1'1
:. ,- ===2!' -- .~:;"-i- !! ~ \i
",,:~ ..'~. = i I rll
l!"~ _ " ~.-;- [
:ii: @ j~.'i
R.., 1 ~ '~I;
'~ ;;:;::1:'1
~~"tll!l; il
~L.. .il.i III
:'1'1 Jlill
' 7 'I,
"", ' I
!;~f)!, i I
,,~r i ..~
i j
~\111
~ -J
-......: J.~....;>liw", '
il
~ c-,
il
I,
F"
!._,..
~ ,,~
!\)'
I _.0. ~
~ '.) ~
,
~ ci)
'~'
I" 1 ^-
~III
,
I
-;;;~i
~~~-
~~;,
"
Ii
~~ .ll~':::
1"'11,.
~~i;
;:~: ~:c:-I
'Ii
i' I
~~~~a
".1.,
~~~~~~
~i~l~~
.1, "
~1.:g~B~
"~~~~~
1"'1
~~~~
'~~\:l
I".
~ 1"1 I
, ,
'j I
j ,
IJ
j
'v.. ,JI' i
""'" -
','~ / / I'
'" , 1/ ~,,,",
'" i\ ~
/ < ,/ , \1--,--':',_,_
' ,/ '/'
' ,/
/"
...
'l:j~
Iii
III
-'l
~~
!i
.!
"
i
.....,.,
.'
,
1
)>
:D
o
m-U
Z~
r
)>I~
:JJ__
OrZ
mr?D
Z(J)-<
;!; C
rO-l
r -
C/)Ilr
?:Il~
Z--u
Or
m~
-0
)>
:JJ
^
~"'"
:r;:
",Z
"': V1
il'~
"
z
i"
, -0
..-
:<-
Z
I SOooJB'2~"J:::
32874
!
"I
>;:M
~~
~~
~1Ol
l;-
oS
."
,iiil>
""
~~
sn' ~
;~ ~
~iil
~~ fl
~ ~
~ Q
i ~
~ 01
(})-
I
I"
. ~
,~
'.
.111<
.-'I~:
i'~
}~
~1
\".'1_
~
~.
,~-,
"""
ii' I}
~
,,""'"
;i,',.
B~'
i ;:E
~ >
z
-;
. z
,_ C1
3 -0
s:
Z
~ VI
"
:c
@ 6
c
..-
~ m
.
!
I,
Ii
I~
I
~~
m
'"
,- :<-
c, "
^
-0
s:
Z
>
Z
o
m
~
::;
o
Z
,fS:~~"'~i\ IY\ ~b
i~t.l.~ifqy ~
"
':)
.j",'....'
,
~
g
6
~
"
,
.
<
~, ~, - i~ Is 1~-1
" 1011 i,. I'.' 1::1
f-:;Tl ~ !-- ~~ !: -" -I ':,
..~i-+ ~ i~ll~ 'I
, (-II~:,i I~':I' !I~ "0 "
8 ,e' ~ ~ ~ ~
n i~1 ~i t ~
1;;- I I ~ I ~ n
_+_1 :~!
I I.'
~;;
I,g ,
:~~I ~
Ii si
r"cl
i \'21
"
,
~
~ ;;.
.
~
~
~
~
"
~
~
!:
>
:::: .;.
iti
~I
~
~!
,.
"
.
.
<
,
,
.
~
~'
~
,
,
~
~
~
~
I---j
i
18;
I,<~' gi
~",'
i"'?";
,
f!-L
, I,! I
I ~ I
I: '
i g I
i I I
I
I ~
~
a
~
.
~
~
,
5
8
>
s
.
,
~
j
Q
,
'!::I
'1
,
! I
"
~
~
o
~
:1'
,.
,
~
~I
~I
I
~' I ~
, I ~
",I
~:
,
g
~
~
i
.
,
o~
I'i
, ,
I EI
"
i
~
:"'1
~
~,
I
''-''
'"
~
-r-'''
.~.
()
=1
-<
V1
C
'"
3:
:l
--i
);-
..-
I;;:
" r-
r-)>
)>Z
Zo
V>
(J
)>
v
m
,
~
~
.
o
~
.
Q
}~ .'i' 2' %. !;:;
~ ~~~,~ I~
. ,;g~'6 i"
,~ ~~<:Qi'f"o I~ g
I ;t;"'~::;0l~ S <:>
I "'~~.:,.
8'~'"'~ I ^
2iil;Sl~>;~ Ii'
I ~8--<::;:f>;8 I ~
. V1~~~~~ C>O
I gg~.s 0
~ ~g~ ~ ...
,
)>
:-I
--"
~ ~a
"'''''
~P:"d
~ ~~;~~8:!l ,""
~q:~B:~
~~~~"'2~~~
';; "'~~!~~ LJ
~ ;g ~~ ~ ~
~ ~~~ ~ ~ 6
~~~::~ ~
n L'!l'" El VI
~i~~~
:;:z: g
;:; ~~
'" ~--<
.~~
"~~
~ ~
~ F
~ ~
'5 i!<
~
"
,3'-0'
rq
" '
~,~
. "', r;==;-J
!~
, F...J)
, ,
~ =-==d'
.
,;;;;;;:
,0
!
,
~
~
~
"
~
-;
'"
m
,m
,
"'~~ ~~~~ ~
~~g ~~~g ~
~~8 ~:e~~ -<
~i~ ~!~~ ~,
~~~ a:~~ ~
~~. ~". ~
);I:~~ - ~~ ;-
~~~ ~~, ~
~8 ~,i
.~ ,~~,
"' ~~~ ~
~s ~~s ~
~l L~ 0
~,~ ~iliS
<Ii.., ;;;'i8
~~ ~~8
~~ gh
_0> ~~~
~51 [:lB~
~ ~'~.
- -~
-It
$
;:;
<<._,
t-=
~ ~ ~... ==0
~ '" ~ al:;
id G:ll'l::lQ)
;:"" a 2" 0(0
~Bl .g !& g g
iii ~f~
.
n.
.'~
iii ~~
8 ~~
'" "
OJ ~~
~ j~
L~",
~ ~~~
:'!i ~:;;~
;;: ~;z';j
" ~~
~ J:i=
~
~ Ii
Hi
a ~~
d ~i
> ;~
~ g~
~ ~'"'
Oft.
~" ,,,
<ji!'; 2 ~
~~; ~
g~~ ...
~g~ !
- ~ '" ~
',0
Co ~ ~
'"
;$ ~ 8~
i;1ffl ~O
,;; .~
oh.
"'.::/ 8~
. - .
- g 8~
~. ~~
I~ .~
o' .g
., .,
~~ ;;;;~
0" "".c.-.
~i ~i
l'" g_:
~i
~C1
~~~ ~i ~
~''''B:~~
o~o ~. !
<t:s'" j;f;'; f2
2gi i~ 8~
n ~g ~~
~'t ~~ ~~
~~ ~g ~~
~: ~~ ~~
~"2 ~~ ~~
,,'"' '-i!'! =""
.!l~' ~,
0>
~~ 8. g.
h o_?'
5g -<,., ~
::2~ h: ~
o~ x ."
;:lg ~~ ~
5!~:-<<; ~
d<' ~ ~
~::.< ~ :.:
~~ '" ~
<~ 8 ~
>
;::...; ~~
~~
z "" ~'"
o ~,
~ -i ,~
-I i>:~
a is
'" ."
::c oz
:::":l lO;
ie 'f,~
'co ~~
0<
,~ .
> ~
e= -
I
~
:; N
?" n
" ~
I::;;
,m
10
c
I~
1m
~'-~ ,-",
~P~8~
~~~~<;i
;;;",,,,--:,~
~r;~~'"
!w'
".'"
S/<l::'"
~~,~
a~~'"
~r;@~
~i'~g
_'0'0\1
"-<"''''
~~. ~
o " ~
rTl i~
~ ," ~
F ;;;~ ;;'<
"" ~
15~
,. '
~
"
"
.
"'~ : ~ ,~ "~-~ "
;S"-'c:l i!?' ifl,., ;:<
",. '~ ' ~;, .'~'"_-::i!
1'; . ~ "'.It ,."'-3,0'" L-
~n i ~--'< ~~~ "'~ z~
i~ ,., ~ "'~ '-'~" ~~-~
~~ i s i.~ ~~~ ;i i~
~'" -, ~ ~~ "'s:-. ...~ !:l C)
~~ ~ ~ ~6 ~g~ ~~ ~r: Z
~~'-'~ 5! f8,~5~~ -.d 8 m
-<5\ '"" . 5!;o;o~", ~,., C _;:>:l
~~~i11 '" ~~~~~ o~ 4, ~ >-
~~~~ ~ .~~~~":i il ~ ~ ~ ~
~;;B: ~ ~.;~~, ~ co d '"
gO,o ~ Q' ~~ ~ 0
~l::~n._ ~ i':ffi;;5~ ~ ~ ~ ~
"'0_ ~ dgF~~ :~ - ~
~"2!::1r;; ~ l,g'::':<i!'o :5~ ~.'" . ~
;r;~:!il:; "'~ ~~ ~~ _. !- ~
~~ii i ~~~7~ ~~, ~ ~ 5
~~;;i~ 8 ~~~~~ ~~ ~ ~ <5
"'''S;~ -< p.!~~~ ~~ ~, ~
~~~~ ~ ~~~8~ g~
~ "'.., ~~~l~ ~:<: <- .~
,,~,~ ~ .02" ,.
~;i1~ ~ ".
s:
Z
o
n'
:<-
-0
m
Z
o
-;
m
'"
~
~ '
9'-,,_/
e'll
~ :z.
~ ~ : VI
~g~F:..!"2~~8 n to,. l::j
~~~~~~ ~~r~ ~~~~ ~~ ta-; ~ rn
'ii'~~~}.l~ "8~g ~~.l;;~ ~~ ~'f! ~ Z
.,.g~. 02" ..~o ~.~ " IS
8~~~~i!: ~~E ~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~,_ jl"'T"1
:;;e6~~;'l g~~ ,,';;i;iS:<]'l!: il\"l1: .. V1
?.-~~~~ ;z;L.fl '" ~Q\,:,; ",: i~
....\(iVl"''"';a C;~i,J"'~:'"l~ qO 0 ~
~::i i>l?i.::;! ~?i~ i..5!'" l';\i] ",jl -
~~~~~!i ~~~ ';1S~~ ~~ ~~ ;
~8:;:~ g8~ ~~i~ 2Wj~""
','6~" ."a~g,a~"". ~
o~';,' ,.~ i/!~~ 5~ ~~
~~~.$;~ ~~~ v;~::\1 8!f ~~ ;z;
Q:>-'""~z ~::h.: "'. ~i!g on I;;l '"
.".~~ '0" O;<,"""~' '.
g~~;;;'" "'~:z ;;:~..ii B!'1 '"
tJ if,~";I;: 'i)",c 3115-.--- ;;;: 8,"\ ~
iis::: !;; ~~J,~ ~"~ fl\~ ~
"si~", iii~g .dO 0" ~ .
~~gVi~ ~8~' ~~~ [;!~ ~ ~ [
~~~~~~ 8~S ~g~ ~~ ~ ~ I,
I':; ~ n c~ e:~S2 ~,,-., '" 0
o. p So ."" '" . ".",
"o~.~ g.' -iii. ,,;; . ,. "
~a~M 19~ ~~~ F '
~ ~ g ~~ Si~ ~
~jg~
L:lf;;G
.~~
::'~
r
.
.
~
/
/
!
ii'i'"' ~
~~ ~ ~
i:i :
'::)"" -
~~
"'
ri
\
~ C,iI ~
2 2i2 ~.~
08 ~'
~~ 8~
~,~
~
a
~
~
,
~
"
~
~
~
<
~
~
!
~~
:;-:
:€
~
"
"
,
.',
!!
gg
~o
"
~
s~
"
;~
~
.
~
~\;VI::T~
V\J J\/v';
C ",,' . i';:yt"
I , l\t'\,ft'III-l("'\.
/~"il~M",'j';i'f~ ' \
/ l1iii;~S~ii ,<\ \ \ \
~ ~ ~: g ~ ~~ ~Q ...~::: ~~ 8
::) ~ ~ "'!; ~ M9 8~ ~~~ ~'Z _
. ". 8 ~ ::; ~ "ia-<-1 ~8~ iQ:iJ co
'" ~ "" .. 0) ;;"" "'3 a :;: i[!:
~ $ ~ ~ ~ :<J ,.,~ ;3 ~ i~ ~
~ :iii ii? ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ ""
~ ~:.. ~ ~r;; :1' ;:<~
;: i;; ~ ;a 0~ ~ii,' !;
!e !i! ~ Fl d~ ,:C, "';<;
~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~
1 ,,~ g~.~ "0'
-- r:J "'", -~~ ~f,
~ i ~ ~r;:!1; 'i3
~ ~ ,., ~ ~~
~ 5 ~~ ~
~;;;
~ ~~~m~~
~ 0 ~a :~~F~ f
in ~ '" ~SS~~1;> \ '. /.
. \ I ~ mo~. , /'
is " ,0"" ~4.'
~ ~~~:::; ~~~~t
C "", ' ,\).,.---c'.. ""0'
o ~ el~~f' /"'Ii':}::"',\ \ \;:-'1';~-f'~"
C - ,," Ii "1"14\\ \\ \ i
(/l ~ ~~~ I ( ,I ~ \ \" \ " I
;;j ~ ,~~ g~~:g8~'~~: ~.~~
~ ~ ~:;:~:l~:~~:2..3~__~~~",
o ~ i:<: ~~:e""8p;"'~ o;;:"'~~"'~fS~
m ~ ~~b~;~ g ~~~~"~r~ ":Q:::s):, '
-; ,,: H~'Ca , ~~,~ .a
>!::~ "i;OK""....'
F ~ ~ J I ~ _ '" "'~ ~ 'iJ ~e ~ / \
<; ~ ~ G; -::::: ~ ::s~ ~ ~ ~~ ';'10' -
~ a :< 'i! ~ ~ n ~",3 ~ ><_ 5l~ '0'
i '" ~;:;:.:'; ~,~ ~ g ~ ~ ~<;- J
:; E~...~ ~'!i~;-~~"'o'"
i!!i ~ ~ '5 ~ 3 ~-. ;: ~
~ ,~ 0 ~ g ~ -.g ~p- ~
~ '" '" :; ~~ ~ (J
~ ~ ~"l~ '
~ ~ '?i ~ ~~
~ ~ ~
>0>
"'~'"
O::!JO
Z~Z
~~~
l=;;t:Il=
"Vl A Vl
3::
z
VlV"\Vo__;;>:l
V1;ICOO
~o~g-<
.....;:;>::J m >-
m-l-nr-
~'""'O
mO.
:;f'm>
" ~~
3:: m",
Z "'m
-;>
::]
.
l"~
- '"
'::j
'",
6.1 t:
6' CJ
'I
.-;
Z
C)
--0
;;:
Z
-e
, ~
,O'
.' f,.
:.Iig-
.., ., 'I
,.
,.
..
.
.
~
~
g.
. g"
:.'lnTl' , . i ~,"_~;.! ~ :: : ::
"1 , '"
" . ,. . "
c' go .. 10' ~
I ' ,~1' i ",.,,"..
~
,.
,.
g'
,.
[ ~f
"I
;,
,.
.
~
[;'
g'
~
~
,.
.'
g" ;;' p.
,. "~ ',: ~~I" ~
,;:' :: b
~. ". c' ~. g'
,. . : I
" f '
~:A~:: ,'.'::
~' . <~ 15"
~. i;' _
:~t:;'I:
'" l~. ;;:' roo
.. I,
,.
.
::
if
:; : ; : JJ U
,. '1-:j' '
. ',r----! .' ,. '~.~ ,. ".
'11-::.:. ,. .
:. :.'=----1 ~: ,.--,. ,'" " , ,
' " . ~ '; : -: .> : ':
~. ", '"
,,'
."
;,
l'
,
!i
r :
l ::
.
';'
,
". ;0' p
:: "~"I' '.::"".
" ! . .' ~ "
. ,". c. ~'. ~..,
· , , : 'IC' : ; ; : ':r;:; : : :
"::~:,:'P:::..I.."~:,,,..
'. ,.~ . ,.
:. I~~ ' ;. ',;1:: :: I 1~!illJ: j h;1~: ':: :. :
' ~~_l_. '--eJ.==- '.. E. "
,. -= c:-- .
- I ". ,.,'
" I lid:
1 1_" ,
.J. j; ;/:. .' "
.-/./.
~.
,.
~
..
.
b"
8,
.
;::'
p.
.
t;;'/
A ::
.,,' ~. 5-----
'~",.,
.. '-- -
;, CI c' D.
b'
,"
,.
..
,
.
:1
.,"
"r
;1
g.
"
,.
b'
"
"
,.
,.
:\;"
"
E.
,.
"'~.
,. ~ 'e. .'
: " :"~:: ;.
s" w' !' "' ~.
,
~. ~ IR :3 1'.. :' : ;, .. ,. "
. : :~ :~~: ; ; : : ; :
i: . 1: :~~~ - ::::", t :
:; :1' . , : : _ ""::,'
'I ~ /I "_-L-.c'----"----:, ,. ,. ,. .. .. " ..
~.
..
~:.
( g"
'"
.
,.
,.
~
,.
~
g"
"
I'
"
o.
.
~
~
,
,.
,.
~
.. - ~ -
'C. ,. ..
p. '-"~ '"
>0 > ~IcgO
"'~ '" .....0-10-<
o~ 0 ~~r"11(J;:::
"'n'" <~?Jo
;~ "'%;~ > ;: Z"'Z
.. '< ~ .- 0 ; , " :t 0 I""I ",0 >
0 ~~~,,~ ~ i i'.-~"" ~. ". ::;; m""
. , 'B , ~e",~~ , , Ci)~;'~ r-~F= . ::;;'"
I ,..e.\il@
, '~.~ 8 o>J --< in 0- 2" ~ ~ Y;""1..fl ~ m'"
I , ~ ~I
! ~~~ ~!:1 ~ ~~!!i~8 ~iH .g~:=I;' .-;!j;
;:: 8 ~ ! , , !2 ~"i;~~ ~ ii:~i~~ ~ Z
-O,V' o " 0 . a , ; ~~~ S
. , 0 ~ e~"~;. ' ';1ii'i:!:Si iilm: Z
H:..; ,I () 'C)-i ~ ~ ~ . ~~~ii l~~
Si: ~ ~"'", "
~ )>..J...m e ~'h.. .liEs
\,_Jj ~'" . hi
z-i o , iiil;;i",~
~, I, I. '~il~~ 1 ~~~~."
I. , ~- ;;I ..~ m ,
Vi Z , " ~gs~s 0 ~!~~ i
" , 0 ,
c C) , I~ S (iI~l '"
'" , I ~ '"i ~
~ I
)> ~ I
--"
N ,
"
r
-n
m
(j)
:<
r
m
(j)
,.
~
.
,.
~t
r r "D
D pI:;
i---i!5"iO
i1) c_.
W - ~
3:
3:
J>
AJ
--<
z
<:
:;
C1J
--,
C1
rl-
I/)
J> C
;: 3
3
"Dp
--, --,
0,;,-<::
c.
,~ 'I
'rl
,~
,.
"""":;0
::::... p
~ n
- --<
::s '<
p ""0:
I:::;; r1J I
'n
I",
,.
-~ c
n ::s
rl-
U1
"
,.
g'
ru, J>
In i <
\O!eo
g.
~
.
OJ 3:
Ul ~
,.
,.
0'
,
,,1-; ,
o .o?i
;" ,
,
i --+
ILJ I}>
(J1 <
'C
'"'.....
o~
"
OJ ~
Ul p
0 X
co .....
""
"
,.
g.
.'
~lr'
'~'
I I !~ i61~.
' ilG- S;-. ::3
I 0 ,0 p
IY~::
m :=n
-o~
--, Q.
i........ ....... DOC I
o..j:::. d.'L. _
1,< I ~ ([J
! ' n
,"
'y
b::1 J> r
p
13"
'"
2:2W~
z ~,
G
r
rl
-,
p
~ "
cu C
co '"
CJ 3
rl'"
c;=!
AJ~
,re
ire
!V)
~ ~ r
-.....j .....J c
UlUl3
00 ([J,
Cl 0 :=; !
U1
co
',J
-u
o
oir
, r
'--J ~
nJ
co
I r t::1
(/;, (/) r1l
, 1 U1
J:> J> n
I I .::?_
I J::-o
-I. I <+
~ ~ o'
I Ul Ul :s
i II
3: ::K;
:r :r'
I I:
rl In
u ,
'rl
'l~
_nJ
rcJ '
U
uD
Dr
r rl
rl
rcJ
i
,
!
rcJ
m
Q1>
~(. :i
II
1
,~"." "
v
~
;c,:;!
':IR
7- ~
el~
o
v;
n
>
"
m
~
r
n
:r
\.-s---------------,.
<;;
Z
CJ
'.0
n
".
u.:g (n
~:Z:r"""
z0f"T'"'.
/7
(
o
m
-<
>
i=
;:::,~"
u"
o
o
)
Ie:
@
m
'"
o
Z
-<
o
m
'"
C
;=
g
Z
[)
, v;
1'-
!
'"
\
I
(7
/T'
_. ","J
-~~
v.
o
o
,
k<
-- rJj
(7
en
o
o
)
J.::
'I
,L
.'if .0'.-
\__~J
lfJ
,.
,I,.
K,
0'
0
0
,
'-ol
~
n .''',
I ,
j.. ~fl u;: UJ
~Z~
;,~!O'j 20
'n
....~.--" n
u
Z
0
, '..,
n Or- I ; - ~ i I I I
=1 rn)>
-< ~Z ,
)>0 . ,
V-' 0
r- V> j
C V>(J
0:0 )>
~ -0 - i
m I ,
=1 I ,
-< I 1'.1 I
0> .
r-- ,
,
)>
---"
l.u
ro-".A
\2.(:7W'
_. m
'r
:' ~
-. -<
b, (5
Z
@
en
=<
m
en
C)
Z
i
>
~ '
~6
..>
'. >
bn
'n
m
V;
en
'Iii
r
m
"
>
'"
"
Z
[)
,:~
,: >
, ."
,. m
eo
m
~
'"
:;
Z
'"
>
3:
"
o
~
i=
@
" ""
, ,
" '"
"0
" r
6, s:
'"
o
,0
,~
'>
i=
6'-0'
(-
I'h-
II
I'
I,
'I
, I
II
II
II
i I
II
I~'
II
II
-+
'~
-'-i
"
b.
;:.'.)
-~-----,
i~f
'-",i<.
~~
;g8
;g
g.
~,
o.
.~
if.'
6'_0'
I --0.
[pl~jz
'@~ ;J;;1;ss",
SR ..~"il
:z: a ~'~ '"'
'\ ~8.~
;=: ....~~~
'" ~ffi~~
~~[3~
@}l
<1f
"
\2 ;,J ~ '"
~ F c ~
'" ~ ~
lu
'" ~ ~
~
V;
-<
3:
'"
o
r
.
I',,; ~
~ :i'\~ i
'IJ~,I ~
Sl.o6E'GOWfi'./
;.;1,
,f!
"I
-,
It"'.!?'
-J~ ';f/
"18 Y
VJ:
',/-
rt---
I "" I
1 " : ,';, II ,:, --I
cM~~ .+1~
~~i I"~.~~ 1m;
~ o~ 5< ~-';:;o. g . "'~.
- -;.:: '" ~ Si3 ---!'.l
'" ?"8 i i~
I;~ ~ l>';il ~ ;:;
~::;E! !~ I ~~; i , o :r 0
5 ~l~ ~ ~~~ ~Cl:T
U'~ G) ~ ::I III
. '0 "' ~ /lHt!
~,t;; ~ ~jii;q ,,;<0 Q c;:; ro (tl
-"'l<' ~~~ ~8f -g~::I::I
~~~
@2"' J ~~~
~S~ ~~;;:
~~~ ~:g'"
I~ 0r;J;o
i )?~_:!':
Vl;:;;~ ~o
~ q"'l' , , ,
~ ...
- m
;,Z
" s:
- '"
,- [)
a"m
'0
-<
<;:
V>
I
"
s:
IZ
rID
- -<
;,'"
'>
" en
, I
,.
o. Z
n
r
o
, v;
'C
'"
m
m
'"
o
:s
m
r
<'
~
o
Z
>'
~ ~
, -<
;,,,,
'>
" v;
, I
,-
" m
.Z
n
r
o
V>
C
'"
m
v;
is
m
m
r
m
<
~
o
\Z
>
;;;~
~
;+;:;
:;:c:
11- 65
~. VI
o m
'Q
o
Z
I
)'-u'
~
,
~
~ - '"
m
Z
n
r
o
en
C
'"
m
4.-0" 7'-51
I
;t
:<
~ ,
"'
~
~O'
11------ I
I' ,
,
I
,
,
,
I
,
,
,
I
,
I
I I
LJ-----
...
!
.
o
,
~ '.
o
~6~
~',
~I
'.0
i~
~,
~~
.,
~~
\
~\
., ~ ~
.~ g ,
~~ ~ ~
,,~ ~ ~
~3 ; ~
o , 0
~~ ~ ~
~~ '-" :c
~ \:
, 5
~ ~
"
o
~ ~
~
5
~
>
o
>
>
n
n
m
V>
en
0;
r
m
):
'"
"
Z
[)
v;
,C)
IZ
li's
m
1"0.[
1'-0-
~~Q
:~
i5rii
~~
.'~
~
I' ~ '119'"'
1ji1;g<>'iil"::'''''
Iill<:j~<"''<l
2"'~:~ 1;
-~:~~~
"" "."
"..?'
1<1~-<C-<a
~ ::
. --------,
~~~~g ~~~ ~~~~~~.
_,.C~ d _.s.~~.
~"" ,''''f'< :>: ~ ~ ~!:!~'::'
!l~.~s, ^". ~"Io!j'
VI~'"'<a, ....~ "68 ~~
"''<l 3:!.~' "'~' ." i!\ '-";.:.
~~ .:::: 8::. ~ ~ \:!
'" "': 8 "': ~ 0 ~
El~ I
~~~'" ~,~ '"' j 1';S"
~a~~ I~~~ ~:~
<;~~i ~g~ ~i!\~
eQR'i:; ;<';::;F ~!il;
j!:.~><;E ~':Rl "'~'"
"." .0 ~.'
<";fi~1i' :;tl 8 oR
~~" ~^ .-~
~M-" ~'-ii.
e;~ ~ ,.," ;,;\",
~ ~ I ~~
r- ,\,
+- ~::.~~) ~~
,~, ( ..
['JII n
l,r~~,~, ~
~~~ H
< ~ ~
~; VI
~ ~
" ^
~ t.;
~
5'-.0.
''1'
Lil'
i!i~lS~ ,. s~
.~
~~:~ ~o a;
,
~,,~ , .~
~~.~ ~ iI.
,', ~
~oo .~
i1'~~ " ..
ii~ " '0
, U
"
fU'
.0
,00
" .
0,
~~;::;
9c!w
~
~ -
! ~)
.tf:~'
,; i LLK\
oil'" "
!_-~ s ~-s*
~... , ''::,
~i ~
'l:!! '"
f~
"
if
?
~'"'-
II
""0>
"'m'"
O:!!O
mnm
ZmZ
I"OT
->=
;::;:0:1;::
~VI ^ V>
Vll.nv>->;:>::J
VlIC:OO
~o:::;g-<
V':;;>::l m )>
m--:.rir-
< ;.n-
r;:;o?'CO
:;f m>
. :;fG
~ ~;;Q
Z -l~
c::<
-<
:;::
Z
~
.<
~
c
~ z
=<
I",
'm
>-
'"
n
~
'...:.J
)>
N
N
~
C
'"
~
=1
..,
"'
r
.
m
r
m,
<
>-,
~
is
z
mm
.--x
m-j
<m
)>",
-j-
-0
0",
Z
l/l
c.iii
-&
1<
~
g
~
,a
I'
I
~
,
.
,
i_' Ii
~ ~
>
1 '
-e
~ @j
0,1 ;$ C-~- ~' '"
~Ic is
m
o Z ~
.=< , , r
~ ':E
r ,,--- ::;
~
<
::; " is
(5 :: z
z
"
"
,
,
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"_n_
"
Wm
"
"
"
"
,
- ,
iQ~~i
~." ml'
~~":'
"g~::
"'~611
c.';:-iT
K ~_
rr.
%~ i~'i
"'3 Lf'---
0,., ,,<Wl ~
~;:: ::~::s
;~ ii=~
,,;,n 118!
~~ :~>(
9~ "
"'''' "
"'l:: "
,
r:.!-, ::
"'~FU-----
~';i::
if!:;i;211
g~~::
II
IE
;~ ;
~
I I' 0 ~~O ';
~ ~~~~~
~ ~fj~t'l~a
~ :Sp:~!iq~'<1
~~~m~~
"'ei>~----!~
~j.;~~~E
"'o=<'=';!I1> .
~1'P;
~ ~i~~; I'~ I
,~ ~"'l B I
,
;-'
~i g~
.>
~~ '"
""., i;g
"'R ~g
~~ ~i
:~ ~.~~
',.S
,~ ~,~
~~ 'i!;!
! ;:
;ti
~.,
,n
Iii ~"'I~
~Q~ I-I-I
I
-e.
~ ;:
~~g.
,,(Ii:lll:l
rl~tI)tc
.g~gg
,
c..
~--, ,
"
::
"rl
K::::::::::::::::
W-__n__nn___.
@j
-I"'
~ -<
, -
" v
,:,R
~.: F=
'I
"', ~ >-
:0
:0
I~
II
Z
>-
Z
o
~'n._.
/-0 ^',l '",'. t, '; l~
U'~i ~z~ 11- ',~
I~ : ~~~ ", 5~---'~
~~:-.~ .\
. " \
\ \ \
.:_~~ ~ ~~
" 8 ~~
~~
>
r
ei
I
..,
~~
~
~
~
Gii
\'i
I~.." "'c;
.~ q
~!2i f.t:;
!"g ~
;;lili 8E
"~
~~ 5~
~~
~~ ~~
;c
Q'
~"
"'co
ei5
i]i',
I~
~:<;~
,~~
"''"~
.~-
...
~,~
~"g
;--;"":C::
YI~~
~il\~'
h~i
i~~
""'8J::
~@
.
~
!l
~
~
>0>-
"'.,,'"
CJ:I!Ci
Z~Z
;!;~~
~~~
~V) ..., lJ)
~
Z
~
,
~
~~-
~=:
7,~~
~~~
Ii
."
1','1
U
p~
~~~
,..n
~~~
~8
~.
~~
~B
""
~~
.~
~
^~e
~x:g
~_,9
,..0"
-<"'Ii
~~
,.
n
~'!l
%c
88
~\2
fi~
~~
~':?
('''' Q,
71 I~:I
'& c-'
,g
~~
.0
i~
2
~
,
~
X
..,
,~
~ 16
,'"
~ '~
~ 1)>-
~ I~
>:: ;;:::>:l
~ I~
~ I
~ .
~
"
i1j';<:
~~
,
~
.. -'-
V1<.,nlJ).....7'l
::1ICOO
~O=ig-<
""';::>0 m )>-
"'~0r
~g;?='o
:::: ~>-
. ::::(:;
~ m",
Z ~>
r
::!
.
,il~
\!?p
, ,V>
~:a
:.I~
.,~
~I~
6
,z
,
~'
-:j'
~15
,m
;1''''
'" m
'<
>
,..,
16
,z
,
I
I
I
,
I
-.
'.
.-
,
0,
~~
,.
~~
~;
51<
~Q ~-
\ ,
\: I,
~:::~J~",
"
>
FL
~q~
,,~
,.<
~~~
~s,
~"S
,
~
, ~
~ " 6
"
) )
I
,I
~
~
. ,
~~ ~
~ ~~ ~
! 8"~ ~
~,
~~
iii"
o.
So
G'"
E:a
""
.0
,
~
i=
@
.',.,
~>
",.,
-. m
~ h:;
~
6
z
~ ~
/'~.''''''\
"
IJ
'~"--~-
"
"
,
r-i:
oa",:r----....
."",
.c;~ ::
88 ::
m8 Ii
"'~ ::
~~ :i
^~ ~
: ;~~-~
"
!i
w---
"
"
- .."
''''
"'\0
"z
, ..,
"
"
"
,
~l
"'''\:1----
.~." "
~~ ~----
88 ::
~g Ii
:~ Ii
~;;j ::
~~ ii
"
"
len__
"
m
....
~
iO
Z
"
Uhn
"-
"::<
II .~
ii ;[:i
i1 ~~
,,~~
\
"
"
"
"
W
1>____
"
i;
"
ii
['
;;
~
"-
't
"
r
~'----
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
q
~~
y
t/l\\ !
~,~ :;g::g 8~
~~ .;; ~ 3~
~~ ~ ~"
'<i8 ::: O<l
~! -.;
p:>g
R""
@ ;~ ~ @ ~ ~ ~ \1iI 'rn I
Ie, ,x
v I~
~;; r~ ., P" ~O" gOO g< .
0, " ;:"If .0 "'~~ _0 ~
I" .g ~~ i!ifilfj -.
~ :::3 ~. s~~ i:1a~ ~:S gL~ ,!is
~~ s~_ "'~" ~il ".
n 8~ ig<;: i1,~ ~g ~ ~
~;" <-
~~ 8~ Ell:; ." 0< ~i 9!i'! ~ >
!S ,. p' Ffl8 -;
> .
j;~ ~~ g m
'-8 ~~ ;;,:f ~~ i~ ,.,
F ", '- <" z~ , s:;
~~ ," S go 88 "
^. R1g ~~ g~ ....
~~ 5,'1 .. " V>
" i!;~ ~S , ,;:::~ ~ l,
;;;;~ ~j i'\e:
~~ ~~ ~ " ;.; ~
8 ~ j;i~
0 "
8~ ~ " ';:'''' ,
~!l . ~H
,
, , .' .,
'.
~ () rr;;-n ;, ! , I I I ,
r-x , , j i I I' iii i' ~ li~ I, ii\~~~ >0> V11J"11...1'"l-l~
~L .., rn-l I , I , Vl:I:COO
, i ~~~ !; . ~:I:~ "'.,,'"
-< <rn , , diSi . O:no ~O~g--<
,o8~~~ g ,
>-;;0 , "nil "'n'" ,.,m >
tJ1 i;g~ ~~ ~ a. o~ . ,
-1- 6 .."';;J'" H']. ZmZ <C;;0r-
C -0 ! ,> ~~~i\Ol~~ I s ~e!;l'i::::1 ," g~mcg
I" I ~~~1a~ ~H :r:-c:r: iTiOr'O
'" 0;;0 -::;:. ~~~ , l;l ~=:l -);o-
Il "':3"'. :E m>
3: , 8~~ ~g; ,. , ~~a~~ ~,.,~
Z Q ~~@g:~ , ~ "'QI/>"'~' i" ~~~ ~r:;:; 7' r:;; . :E Ci
)> ~ If) , I : . =~*1:i~ iii ~ m",
1"'CO ~
I i I ~{'jg~a,~ m~~ Z ~<;
N I , I Z
:.....,. )> i I ;;j~ei,:ii1~ 0 ~~.~~...: ....
.... : , , I i ~ ,', ~ ).o-",~o -;
: 1iJZ"l , -<
, .
,
.
riJ
-' ~
." f!-
U 0
(f) ~o
w_
w
U ~ .
5:: " -"
0
0.. ~ ,"
." ?
<>:
0
.
~rYA
~~
.
.
I~
l)'
r
W,
~~
I
WII
l)~
<[I,
i'
IL"
"
nJ il
U-ii
::::JI,
.n',"
\JII:
il
.ni'
U11,
::::Ji'
I'
01,
>1:
I,
fl"
"
"
Wi
n Ii
ILII
Eli
iT
'!
~.
g>~ J;:;::
'g g ] ~
"0 u_
e~ !~
~~ ~~
~~ ~~
/:. /:.
e;""",,IO~U
~~~ Q: g
g: t:> ~
-l~'il-'O)~
~ :l'.,~ ~ ~~
g~~e:J::e
, I
-P~
"- .
. C
o-u
III 0__
<ON
"'..
;ci
~~
~d
~
I:'
M
IJi
\I
.,..
~
0)-
N....
'"
"'
~
~
~'
~
/- ')
;
~
'"
~
1\
~
I"
..."
'"
~
~
ro
%'
r:--
-
II II
~
.. )\ \>j ~
~ ~ \I '"
0( ,,~ ...
~ , '"
, O. I:i:
\I) ~. ,
';\ '"
~
It .,.
,. ~
III
v,' ~
~ ~
~
..;
R!i)
~ ~
~'-->
-\-'
'1-.
*'
;.f I}l
.... ';"'"
q.. '" "'l'
li-.. ~ ~l
\\ ~ ;t
.. .."\ ~
~ ~ "
~' h
'l' "'-
~
~
"
Ii)
..
~
.,
~
"
cl:
~
~
'!: .,.
~
" ~
it h
~ ~
.:>
~ V
~ "
r~
I
<
~
"r--
'< ~
~ >>
~ vi
<<; >--
~
f\~
.,..
.,!! ~
< ~
IJ.\'--'
U)
'"
~
...
.\
t
~
'"
""
{
....
II)
~
l:'
~
~
~
~
. I
2 w'ti
;-, z. .,-~~
~...~
I-<lH
.. h.
Q {,\n.~
li~-'a;
~ 1LS
Ii diU!!
~
":
.
i
'.
~ ~.
..~:~ljl; .'
l:ll~r,~ '~
~"-t
.;'",. ~~
'~;,"I
~J'tt .'
, ~..~'
. "1"f.' .
".~ "~i:'.z".
t~.
.'.J,
,.
~:.
~
~\\
~'
""./
.~~ *'
\~~"
'.. "ifr
.~~if5
d,-~
"w
"
)
"
,
~-t\.
"q
"
I
I,
,"
::"~~';
".
'\'.,
~.
~'
~' :'\1 \
'. :~.:. "
~. .~~"'- I""
\
- ~;.,-
.;
,
"".\
;X
,...1','
,
\.~
,.
~_J,
"k.
~~~~, '
';.
,.,
t ~~1'
t\" .,
ii'~:;
,)I,.... i.~\
.;,~..' .--;;.,
-.',"< .~.""..
1(\.". :' ')
""'I.\:~ .~. \~. .
'1" L~. '~\\m,':1,
~~, '.; ,;1{f. ':
f~tf~:' ~l
'"
,',
I.:.
i
,
i
I,
! ~
~ ~:'t.
.
"\'., 't
"
~',*\
\, , .~
~. "
(J'~";~~..
" \ 'd
fl~'
,',
,
.....
.'
,
'0~:
~l..
\~ ^
;\
'.,
'l.:. ~ ~ .'
" ~!'i
',of.
o).~
1'~' ~~,
;; ,.\-"
'.' ~:/i":,w, ':'
'.. ~~ .:~r\:;r'- ..,
\
"
......:0,
'.~ ';\~;.
rt:~!
'-.1
~ ,"
"
,
,-.,\.
)'"
.
.
.
,.,'~">--.,
t )
',~ /
~<'-""'-
\, )
Planning Commission Meeting
June 1, 2005
Attachment 4b - 3
~...' "
()
.
TRAFFIC IMPACT REPORT
FOR
ARDEN HillS OFFICE PARK
ARDEN HillS, MN
.
Prepared for Royal Oaks Realty
by Traffic Data Inc.
May 2005
.
. ,\ ~
Traffic Impact Study
for
Arden Hills Office Park
Arden Hills, MN
.
Prepared for Royal Oaks Realty
by Traffic Data Inc.
May 9, 2005
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report
was prepared by me or under my direct supervision,
and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer
under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
.
By:
Michael P. Spack, P.E.
License No. 40936
Date:
Traffic Data Inc.
3268 Xenwood Avenue South
S1. Louis Park, MN 55416
www.trafficdatainc.com
.
.
.
.
C)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Project Description..................................... __..__. __...... ..__........................1
II. Existing Conditions... ..................... ....................................................1
III. Traffic Forecasts...................................................... __... .......... ..... .......6
IV. Traffic Analysis... ..... ...... ...... ........ .... ...................................................... 13
V. Conclusions and Recommendations........ ....... ..__.........____..........................14
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 - Location Maps............. ..... ... .... ... ............... ..... ..__..... ........ ........2
Figure 2 - Existing Lanes & Traffic ControL.......................................................3
Figure 3 - Existing AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.....................__.__....__.__......4
Figure 4 - Existing PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.. ... ..... ...... ...... ..... ..... ........5
Figure 5 - 2007 AM No-Build Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.__.......... ........... ........8
Figure 6 - 2007 PM No-Build Peak Hour Traffic Volumes... ... ... ............. ........ ..9
Figure 7 - Trip Distribution..................... .......... ... .............. ......... ............ 10
Figure 8 - 2007 AM Build Peak Hour Traffic Volumes........ ...... ..... ..... ...........11
Figure 9 - 2007 PM Build Peak Hour Traffic Volumes................. ....... ...........12
LIST OF TABLES
Tabie 1 - Weekday Trip Generation.. .......... .......... ... ...... .............. ...... ........ 7
Table 2 - Forecasted Weekday 2007 AM Peak Hour LOS Results.....................13
Table 3 - Forecasted Weekday 2007 PM Peak Hour LOS Results.....................13
APPENDIX
Site Plan
Existing Turning Movement Counts
Level of Service Calculations
Arden Hills Qffice Park
Traffic Impacf Study
Arden Hills. MN
May 2005
,
I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
.
A 76,000 square foot office park is proposed in Arden Hills, MN (see Figure 1).
The office park will be comprised of 30 "town-office" style units. The site is
currently occupied by the old city hall, which is vacant. It is assumed that the
development will be fully developed by 2006. The purpose of this report is to
determine if roadway or traffic control improvements need to be made to
accommodate the traffic generated by the development.
II. EXISTING CONDITIONS
Vehicles will have access to the development from existing driveways on
Highway 96 and County Road 50 (Ham line Avenue). The driveway on Highway
96 is a right-in/right-out access for the vacant city hall. The driveway on Hamline
Avenue is a full movement access for the daycare facility, which is aligned with
Karth Lake Circle. The driveways are shown on the proposed development plan,
which is included in the Appendix.
Highway 96 is a four lane, divided roadway with a 50 mph speed limit. It is a
county road. The office park's right-in/right-out access on Highway 96 will be
stop controlled.
.
Hamline Avenue transitions from a five lane roadway north of the site's driveway
to a three lane roadway south of the site. Hamline Avenue is County Road 50. It
has a 40 mph speed limit. The development's parking lot will connect to the
daycare's driveway, which is currently stop controlled. The existing lane
configurations and roadway network are shown in Figure 2.
The existing Highway 9610ld City Hall Driveway, Highway 96/Hamline Avenue,
and Hamline Avenue/Karth LakeCircle/Daycare Driveway intersections will be
critical in providing access to the development. TDI staff collected a.m. and p.m.
peak hour turning movement data at the two intersections on Hamline Avenue in
April 2005. The old city hall is not generating traffic because it is vacant. The
data is included in the Appendix. The existing a.m. peak hour traffic volumes are
shown in Figure 3 and the existing p.m. peak hour traffic volumes are shown in
Figure 4. Average daily traffic volumes for the area roadways are also shown on
Figures 3 and 4. These are 2002 volumes from Mn/DOT's traffic flow maps.
.
Arden Hills q{(tce Park
Tra.ffic Impact Study
Arden Hi1l5, M.N
A-iay 2005
N
W()E
S
No Scale
Proposed Office Park
Arden Hills, MN
.- 'l-~~-_-!~}-1?{'__--CC7
co. ".' ,.:;>, ....~t::a1<"-. _
'; - tJ- -;-3~~.;:\'--';J ., '
~ ~.,~ ~ -".~ ),,!\:~ ~,~.::,'~,~-~,.
",-.:::E:roon ..,h '\ '.-^ zj ,'" '-
. "-<'''-, ! "^""-,,,,-~,,, '>
1;
" '. ;!
;::lfriilJlda-,
:~~\"esfl;f)C-
',,:C:p}ieen=Av~ ...J 'I!\C '.'~::>./':J ',ij
~',::>/
I~,
-p
'"
b
~
S
'"
-" . ~
i~': , f;
\IV OC-ounty.J;!(,ain.::..__.
-51." .
Figure 1 -
Location Maps
Arden Hills Office Park.
Arden Hills, MN
, .Ii''''--
:f:I9i~I",J?~k
'''A k>(
,'~" I
,
Proposed 76,000 SF Office Park Site
Prepared by TOI
May, 2005
b.t
~
)
N
WOE
S
No Scale
HIGHWAY 96
50 mph
w
>
it:
o
z
o
U)
:I:
>-
ill
'"
PROPOSED OFFICE PARK LOCATION
Day
Care
Ct,
*=1+
+~ "'..
KARTH LAKE
CIRCLE
0-
'" m
~
-0 C
mm",
<> > Q.
"''''E
>- m
!Z~~
::> E
Om
u;S
LEGEND
=I Stop Sign Figure 2 -
~ Signalized Intersection Existing Lanes &
- Through Traffic Lane Traffic Cont(ol
r Turning Traffic Lane Arden Hills Office Park
(RighI or Left Lane) Arden Hills, MN
..... Channelized Right
Turn Lane Prepared by TOl
. No Turn on Red May, 2005
.
.
.
[..~'\
l. )
N
WOE
S
No Scale
N ~
N '" ~
..Jl'+
toJ
775 .....
266 "'\
HIGHWAY 96
UJ
>
ii'
o
z
o
V>
:r
>-
W
'"
PROPOSED OFFICE PARK LOCATION
DAY
CARE
CTR
KARTH LAKE CIRCLE
~
o
LEGEND
April 2005 A.M. Peak
Hour Turning Movement Count
source: Traffic Data Inc
Figure 3 -
Existing A.M.
Traffic Volum~s
Arden Hills Office Park
Arden Hills, MN
.
2002 Average Annual Daily
Traffic Volumes
source: Mn/DOllraffic Flow Maps
Prepared by TDI
May. 2005
(-)
'. .
N
Wi)E
S
No Scale
.
N ~
_ m ~
t..6
..... 1,058
r202
.,Jl'-
...t...
10J
1,092 ......
100 "'\
~ v 0
v ~
N ~
HIGHWAY 96
w
>
"'
o
z
o
'"
J:
....
ii:i
'"
PROPOSED OFFICE PARK LOCATION
DAY
CARE
CTR
KARTH LAKE CIRCLE
~
.
~
~ m ~
N
.,Jl'-
26 J
0_
13 "'\
~ ~ ~
N ~
m
o
LEGEND
April 2005 P.M. Peak
Hour Turning Movement Count
source: Tr<JffkDala Inc
Figure 4
Existing P.M.
Traffic Volumes
Arden Hills Office Park
Arden Hills, MN
.
2002 Average Annual Daily
Traffic Volumes
source, MnfDOT Traffic Flow Map~'
.
Prep8red by Tot
May, 2005
.
.
.
()
An intersection capacity analysis was conducted for the existing study
intersections per the Highway Capacity Manual. Intersections controlled by
traffic signals or all-way stop signs are assigned a "Level of Service" letter grade
based on the intersection geometry, traffic volumes, and traffic control. Level of
Service A (LOS A) represents light traffic flow (free flow conditions) while Level of
Service F (LOS F) represents heavy traffic flow (over capacity conditions). LOS
D is considered acceptable in urban conditions, although LOS C or better is
preferred.
Intersections that have no control for the main roadway and stop sign or yield
sign control for the side streets are not assigned an overall LOS grade. Usually,
an intersection that has side-street stop sign control has little delay because most
of the traffic is moving through without stopping. LOS grades are assigned to
each of the side street approaches and main line left turns based on the
intersection geometry and traffic volumes. It is common for the side street
approach to have a poor LOS during the peak hours. LOS F is considered
acceptable at stop controlled approaches as long as the approach volumes are
relatively light and there are no stacking problems. The LOS calculated at a stop
sign controlled intersection is different than the LOS calculated at a signalized
intersection. Motorists have more tolerance for delay at a traffic signal than they
do at a stop sign.
The Highway 96/Hamline Avenue intersection currently operates at LOS C in the
a.m. peak hour and LOS D in the p.m. peak hour. The stop sign controlled
eastbound approach to the Hamline Avenue/Karth Lake Circle intersection
operates at LOS E in the a.m. peak hour and LOS F in the p.m. peak hour. The
calculations are included in the Appendix.
111.
TRAFFIC FORECASTS
A trip generation analysis was performed for the site based on the methods and
rates published in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition. The site is
currently zoned for neighborhood business uses, which includes offices. It is
anticipated that all of the units will be used as offices, but it is possible that a
business with a retail component could be allowed to occupy a unit under the
current zoning. The zoning would not allow high traffic generators (i.e.
McDonald's), but would allow small boutiques (i.e. antiques store). The uses
allowed would generate approximately the same amount of traffic that a normal
office would, so it is assumed all of the units would generate traffic as office units.
The results are shown in Table 1.
Arden Hills Qffice Park
Traffic Impact Study
6
Arden Hills, iHN
May 2005
C)
Based on historical traffic counts on Highway 96 and Hamline Avenue, it was
determined that traffic has been growing with a 3% straight-line annual growth
rate in this area of Arden Hills. This annual growth rate was applied to the
existing traffic volumes to develop 2007 no-build traffic volume forecasts. These
are shown in Figures 5 and 6.
The directional trip distributions for the town-office units are shown on Figure 7.
The trip distributions are based on existing travel patterns in the area. The trips
generated by the proposed development, as shown in Table 1, were distributed
to the roadway system per the trip distributions shown in Figure 7. These
forecasts were added to the 2007 no-build traffic volumes to develop 2007 build
traffic volume forecasts, which are shown on Figures 8 and 9.
Arden Hills Offici? Park
Traffic Impact StU((V
7
Arden Hi/Is, MN
Mav 2005
.
.
.
i )
1.___/
r.\
\ }
N
W(>~
S
No Scale
w
>
0::
c
z
o
'"
J:
....
OJ
'"
PROPOSED OFFICE PARK lOCATION
LEGEND
o
Forecasted 2007 AM. Peak Hour
Turning Movement Count
.
Forecasted 2007 Average Annual
Daily Traffic Volumes
lOJ
820 ....
280 "\.
HIGHWAY 96
o
~
ON.O
~ ~ ~
....l~
10J
0_
20 "\.
DAY
CARE
CTR
KARTH LAKE CIRCLE
~
1.. 10
_0
rlO
Figure 5 -
2007 No Build
A.M. Foreca~ts
Arden Hills Office Park
Arden Hills, MN
Prepared by TOl
May, 2005
'"
>
ii1
c
z
o
tI)
:I:
....
iii
~
()
('~)
1.,0
~ ~ g ....1,120
.,J l '-+ r 210
10J
1,160 ......
110,.
HIGHWAY 96
PROPOSED OFFICE PARK LOCATION
a
a ~ 0
~ ~ ~
.,Jl'-+
30J
0_
10,.
LEGEND
o
Forecasted 2007 P.M. Peak Hour
Turning Movement Count
.
Forecasted 2007 Average Annual
Daily Traffic Volumes
",tr
1.,0
_0
r'O
",tr
a 0 0
~ ro ~
m
000
o ~ 0
N ~
N
wQE
S
No Scale
DAY
CARE
eTR
KARTH LAKE CIRCLE
00
Figure 6 -
2007 No Build
p .M. Foreca~ts
Arden Hills Office Park
Arden Hills, MN
Prepared by TDI
May. 2005
()
N
WOE
s
No Scale
[-1. Siie jlQJf'.
I Arden Hills ,', r--f~\ \,
CF=-::<;\~5% \:;J
11 'j 1 ~~y=-~
::tl.i' , '~ hfW ~'\
"\:~ "" " -~-~! \
;';A:Eg:et1tView:;yi' 'l \"/ tiJ' ~. \
~.~~ .'.....1. c~~~~~~.1 'I
\ t..... ~~-~~~l -~"
'- ,
"
, ,~
~o r': ..
c....,..,
. ...... '0
..w~
-.
~ ~ I.'
Figure 7 -
Trip Distribu~ion
Arden Hills Office Park
Arden Hills, MN
Prepared by TDI
May. 2005
:.)
\ ~
1,110 .......
60,,\
,c<<.)
: .
\. ~-'
N
wOe
s
No Scale
.
\.20
2 ~ ~ ~1,200
.J l "'- r'<050
10J ... t r
820 .....
280 "\
HIGHWAY 96
PROPOSED OFFICE PARK lOCATION
w
>
0;
Cl
Z
o
<n
I
0-
W
'"
LEGEND
o
Forecasted 2007 A.M. Peak Hour
Turning Movement Count
.
Forecasted 2007 Average Annual
Daily Traffic Volumes
o
~
0('.1" 0
v ~ ~
20J
0_
30 "\
\.10
_0
r'O
...tr
DAY
CARE
erR
KARTH LAKE CIRCLE
00
.
000
v ~ ~
N
Figure 8 -
2007 Build
A.M. Forecasts
Arden Hills Office Park
Arden Hills, MN
Prepared by TDI
May< 2005
.
1,260 ......
10"\
w
>
0::
o
z
o
lJ)
:I:
~
W
'"
C)
000
~ ~ N
.J.~
20J
1,170 .....
110 "\
HIGHWAY 96
PROPOSED OFFICE PARK LOCATION
o
o ~ 0
~ ~ ~
.J.~
60J
0_
40"\
LEGEND
o
Forecasted 2007 P.M. Peak Hour
Turning Movement Count
.
Forecasted 2007 Average Annual
Daily Traffic Volumes
f'.~~.";"
\)
...t,.
000
ro ~ ro
N ~
N
W()E
S
No Scale
DAY
CARE
CTR
...t,.
000
~ ro ~
o
KARTH LAKE CIRCLE
00
Figure 9 -
2007 Build
P.M. Forecasts
Arden Hills Office Park
Arden Hills, MN
Prepared by TDI
May, 2005
("J
C)
, ,
IV. TRAFFIC ANAL YSIS
.
A. CAPACITY AND LEVEL OF SERVICE
An intersection capacity analysis was conducted for the study intersections per
the Highway Capacity Manual. The traffic forecasts shown on Figures 5, 6, 8,
and 9 were used with the existing traffic control and lane configurations shown in
Figure 2 to calculate LOS grades for the study intersections. It is assumed the
driveway access to Highway 96 will be stop controlled and that an eastbound to
southbound right turn lane will be provided on Highway 96 at the site's access.
The curb and pavement currently exist for this right turn lane, but the striping will
need to be revised. The LOS results are shown in Tables 2 and 3.
Table 2 - Forecasted 2007 Weekda AM Peak Hour LOS Results
;;t'iifl)!~pm~:R!fI'IiI'ii-~liiljjill,!i:'~~I\iii;; !if"'.'"."'l"';;'
"!'JHi~!!~_~mN("\n:~JiMf~ "..,.$h" '" g~!g~~;"~,,, ~,.-~Ii?:~""~",,,
Hi hwa 96/Hamline Avenue Si nal C C
Hamline Avenue/Karth Lake Circle Side Street Sto Si n F F
Hi hwa 96/Site Access Side Street Sto Si n n-a A
Note: The LOS shown is the overall LOS at signalized intersections or it is the LOS for the worst
movement at an intersection with side street, stop sign control.
Table 3 - Forecasted 2007 Weekda PM Peak Hour LOS Results
)'mtr~urQji~Qnti'!)li';;i1i1i1. ,iN~al"ii.l~)I,.t:mU!:lt.
Hi hwa 96/Hamline Avenue Si nal E E
Hamline Avenue/Karth Lake Circle Side Street Sto Si n F F
Hi hwa 96/Site Access Side Street Sto Si n n-a C
Note: The LOS shown is the overall LOS at signalized intersections or it is the LOS for the worst
movement at an intersection with side street, stop sign control.
.
The Arden Hills Office Park traffic will have a negligible impact on the operation
of the Hamline Avenue corridor. There is no difference in the Level of Service
results between the build and no-build scenarios at the Highway 96/Hamline
Avenue intersection or the Hamline Avenue/Karth Lake Circle intersection. The
right-out access to Highway 96 will operate at LOS C or better during the peak
hours. The Level of Service calculations are in the Appendix. They include LOS
calculations for each intersection approach.
Hamline Avenue provides an alternate access to Interstate 694 for vehicles that
normally access the Interstate from Lexington Avenue. The County is improving
Lexington Avenue this summer to alleviate congestion. A portion of the traffic
currently using Hamline Avenue as an alternate route to Lexington Avenue will
shift back to Lexington Avenue when it is improved. County staff plan on
reviewing the operation of the Highway 96/Hamline Avenue intersection when lhe
Lexington Avenue improvements are completed. The poor Level of Service
forecasted for 2007 can be alleviated by removing the north/south split phasing
of the traffic signal.
.
Arden Hills Office Park
Traffic Impact StlH~V
13
Arden Hills. MN
May 2005
C)
()
.
The amount of traffic coming in and out of the site at the Hamline Avenue/Karth
Lake Circle intersection does not warrant the addition of right turn lanes. These
would be difficult to add given the right-of-way limitations and the location of the
day care center's parking lot. To facilitate traffic movement at the intersection, it
is recommended that larger than standard radii be built on the northwest and
southwest corners of the intersection. This will allow separation of traffic for
traffic turning right into the site and traffic turning right out of the site. A 50 foot
radius is recommended on each corner if feasible.
B. TRAFFIC SAFETY
The study intersections are controlled with either stop signs or traffic signals and
have turn lanes to safely separate through traffic from turning traffic. It is
believed they will continue to operate safely with the minimal amount of traffic
being added by the Office Park. Area residents have raised concerns about
westbound to eastbound u-turns on Highway 96 at Keithson Drive to turn right
into the site. The forecasts anticipate approximately 10 vehicles doing this during
the a.m. peak hour. There is a separate left turn lane provided for westbound
Highway 96 at Keithson Drive. The intersection has clear sight lines and there is
a small amount of traffic generated by the 13 homes on Keithson Drive. It is
believed that this u-turn can be made safely. County staff agree with this
assessment, but they will ban u-turns at the intersection if a problem arises.
.
C. INTERNAL SITE CIRCULA nON
The parking lots for the site will provide smooth traffic flow between the two
access points. Due to site constraints, the day care's driveway will be realigned
to access a shared driveway instead of accessing Hamline Avenue directly (see
the site plan in the Appendix). To keep the office park traffic from dominating the
outbound move to Hamline Avenue, it is recommended that the southbound
movement out of the day care and the eastbound movement out of the office
park be stop sign controlled at their intersection. The westbound movement
should remain uncontrolled to allow free flowing movement into the site.
.
Ardpl1/Jills 0.11icc Park
Traffic Impact Study
14
Arden Hills, lv/N
May 2005
/"')
\.'
V. Conclusions and Recommendations
.
The Level of Service at the study intersections will not be significantly degraded
by adding traffic to the roadway network from the proposed office park
development. The existing roadway network can safely accommodate the
addition of the development's traffic if the following improvements are made:
. Change the signing and striping on eastbound Highway 96 at the site's
driveway (the existing old city hall driveway) to provide an exclusive right
turn lane.
· Construct a larger than required radius (50 foot radius if feasible) on the
northwest and southwest corners of the Hamline Avenue/Karth Lake
Circle intersection to improve traffic flow in and out of the site.
. The day care center's new driveway will intersect the office park's
driveway approximately 40 feet west of the Hamline Avenue/Karth Lake
Circle/Site Access intersection. The eastbound and southbound traffic
should be stop controlled so the office park traffic doesn't dominate the
day care center traffic. The westbound traffic should not be stop
controlled. Traffic should enter the site unimpeded.
.
.
/lrden Hills Office Park
Traffic ImpaCl S'U(~l.
J5
Arden Hills, MN
Mal' 2005
{h)
t,._.._j
(-)
a "_..~
.
ApPENDIX
.
.
Arden Hills Office Park
Trqflic Impact Study
Arden Hills, MN
May 2005
,
~.::--=rr
o
2
"
g'
~
~ .
o.
o
'Jl
~
<I
n..
IIIl
O~
->
IL'
If,
to
J
J
::t
i1i
o
~
<I
s
&
s
Z
<I
J
n..
III
I-
to
,.' l Ii! ..
Ii'" !;; .~
:~ ~ fl; ~I! B
_, "I~ Sl~; I!
~~s---~~
.0
g <.iiOi 1
~ en
~",,--
g
o
o
.
9
5
.
@ AS
.,
.." Ii
o 1 ~i!
~ ;)"'"n',1
/ . ~
"''''' ~ ~
~ 1 ~,~n
,
~~
.>
':~'~
..,
::"::,~ ~
~>--~"n-
ro.'
i
~ ,,~~~~~ ~
:g ~ ~~~h ~,.-
ri ~2 ~~~~~ ~:
2:: ~~~~:~ ~;
~ ~!- t:t,,~g <Ii~
1-<:3~ :il:;;:~~~ ~~
:s ~ r g~";'. ~:l:
'111ii!!!!!!
..
f)
I- <I
<I }- ()
-It- [t ,~
n J) <=,'"
IL hi 71-, ",;Ii
"oJ>
}-~()'3 7'
w .,
~ l.lU I.~
<I <II- =h
omo!!!;L)
2 __J3In>-oSl
_ <t -W"'-
r}-GIIIIl'.
~ otJ!::o~
-1 D!: ~illl.JJ1
III ",I-
I)'lii
n..lil
'"
..
---- ~~!
~ ~~J
, ,',.
~ i~j
~~~
i~ ~
Ji {;;'---
" .,-. ,-
'~r;",
~,
.
~
~!' ~
< .
;:. ~
~ I;
"' .
~ I '
t- ~
~'
~I
!J 1
In.
i
"
jil
,
I ..
~~ t~
R ~t ~~
~~ ii
~. ~
.z,~ j
(f..l2 ..
G;'~ ~
,
-I
-i;:Q ~ - -i
,
1
,
,
!
c'~ t
!
,
'I'
I '
I" '
I ! ~
I"I!)
",.,,--,
,,','"
liD
!ill
,,"t
'-.{Jilt'. I ,!'~" ,I
:/.,". ; :j1:C': '
, ", ,,0 ,.,
!,.,_y i I
"'%
, ,1rL..~' ,
,- LI..
T' "",::['";
",i:'~""
..
I
d--
-- .~~::"3S~_. :__<. _~
.i~
~~
1\
ii}f
~' ~
9~'"'-_'
j;;;:
~'\\
~1\ \
, \ ,~,\
\,_~-__c- -
;_::;:
,.-___r_._r-_
;~" :
. -~,,,..
\ ~~~ \':.:\
f"'-:
~~L_
~:,:,,-'-.;'~,,:
\ '-"
.. ~(; I ,., ." :,' \
,--.'\ ":'0'
~_-_. i
;::
r.:, if:
ff}/, .,
--'"L I
"1--
,.-?~
-.--'./i'
'<'IJI.::''''';';I:;::';;.
u
~ !
. "I'
~ 'l.1
2!<!I
. !'l
~ II!
:niil
~
.
~
,
.
,
/i,~:~'-~:':':--~;;<o
,". ~%~t ,~.
__~},\:._T-.~lJ
."..,..,.,.
.
,
,
,
,
I
,
~l ! o!
~ ~ ~ ~
" ,-
~ !;) !;) ];
Q ~ ~ ~
orr
c I
~gl
~-o
~ig~
ii!n~
~ ~~~
~!H
~ ;~&
~El
rt5.
~f~
.=!!J,
~
C
.
o
~
I
f f~
,.~
<' ,~
IHll
~itl[l ·
.
o
.~
...
CO
Cl
o
!t::
~
.-
.
..-..
Cl
.-
-
E
o
o
<DO
~ e
enro
o~
, ro
<D-o
NO
'l'~
Nro
LC)~
en""
~
~
~
ill
>
<(
aJ
e
E
ro
I
06
<D
en
~
I
N~LC)
06~o
~LC)O
~~N
LC)"<:t~
~~r--
"""C)~
-r-O-.::t~
aJ aJ ill
EuroO
roOOZ
ZOtaJ
Q):m~ g'
LL(J)(J)O-
ill
>
<(
aJ
e
EZ
ro2
I(/)
06-
<DI
ene
~-2
I<(
(J
"
"
>--
e
OMOlOCO
NIDCONCO
r--r--coco..-
'"
Q.ro l'--"<t0'l...-...-
0.-' N"<tCO..-r--
<:(~ NNN("}O
-
;;= 00,-(00.10>
~ .
00 --'
~
S
E
0. 2
u: ~
>--
ocn..-CO"'<tO
""':ONl.Ooor--
NNNNCI)
1: OCONr--I.l>N
0> ",:...-NNNO>
i'i'
,
---..
><;;trn......o"<t
r--mlOC")l!)
.........- N N co
ciCii
0.-
<(~
-0
~
E
00
c
::J
.c t i~ ~ ~ J; ~ ~
'5 ---l! N
0. '
<fJ I
~ ~ ~_N_O"
U: ..c "-1
>-- ,
I
-f
.E OOOtOco"<t
~ ..-~~~~~
cr.
1
i1~1--~-~-~~ i
>--,
i
.~
;;::' '0 Ll}(J)..-'<;tO"l
(1) "'3" 1.0 LOlO 0
en --l N
"
W
-6
~
e
&
00
~
0.
i5
E
e 2
u. ~
>--
OO)C')MlOO
!.....: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
, ,
-il~
.g, ..t~I.N"-N"'-(o
l:?:
Q.r<;il
i~ol
i 1-:
i
MI"--"<too:::tOCl
...-..-..-..-t{)
;:c OCOOClLOCOlO
..c: Q.). N
t --'
0.
Z
E
0.
u:
::J OC")"<t M'<:;t"<j"
E ~
>--
r--i-7~,"<t lOCD"'<tO'l
r' .1". a:f--:" ~'I~ ~ ~ ~ ~
. uo..Il.CLD.-:O
~,g~g~!1--
I I ~ :33331
I', i
l__~
...-U')NOCO
l'-COC")(OV
COo:;:lcor--C")
'"
.........-0(00::>
NCOf'-tOC'?
C'?NNN...-
i
o NO...-C')
(0 CO""" (0 N
0) IJ') '<t" ('I') ('<)
NNNNO
l!)(t) COOl (")
NNNNO
o:;;tOO}NlO
..-ID......OO'l
NNNNCO
co OlO co,....
l,()tO"<tMO
N
0("") (")0 <0
IX) co tD<O co
I!) co r-m co
...-..-.........-co
m...-OlOri
N"<t'<tCOi'"
(")(")(")""0.1
,
,
I'-Ol"'-r--...-
'<tlC)"<tco:...-
'"
~g~~I::
N N N 0.110
N_",_I:
I
I
,
I'-("')C")r--!o
,N
i
i
I
I
LO..-..-"<tl......
,-
...-..--...-Nl{)
........................,'<1"
:2~~2>ro
G..o..D.-ll'o
01.() 0<.0'1-
0.....('")'<1"
tOlc.iu-><i)
0000
NO:O.......('<)CO
-r-(I')(OCOO>
COCO coco M
'"
I.l)l,{)......-Q)Q)
O>......-.......o;){O
......-NNNO>
0.1'<1".....("),0
N..O_I'....
'<1"0:00......-......-
......-......-NNI'--
......-t-O'<1"N
l,{)'<1"t-I'-'<1"
N
I
"~""'I'"
.......vl.l)l,{)N
N
I
'<1"..............'<1";0.1
......-......-......-......-..{O
{ON(")('<)i::!
,
I
,
I
'<1" Nv"'i'"
I.l)N(")('<)'<1"
('"){OO("')!N
("){O(")("'):{O
I.l)l.OlOl.OiN
lO a....... (Qlro
~ ~ ~ ~I~
I
.......'<1"0>1'-1'--
"<t.......Ul"'o;)
MNNN......-
......-N"<tol.......
,-
O"<TNc.oIN
......-......-"..-. !-.:t
"'MNM'..-
,-
N('")N......-Q)
Ii) 0000 N(")
'"
'"
<(
W
cr
ill
2222ro
<1:<1:<1:<1:"0
OlDOlOl-
Cl.:-:.<:?:t.
1'-1'-1'"-1"-
0000
LOONNO>
......-'<1" 0 Ul..-
rocomvl.l)
N
....... I.() 1.0 '<1"..-
t-N"<T<D.....
NNN-.-O>
N<D(,,)I'-Q)
OlD N (") 0-
0....... Q) C'")O
0.1...--..- .....1'-
lO'<1"O",,"'"
I"-vlONO)
co N (")...-- '<1"
"<t'<1""<t"'<D
-.-..-lDCOlO
N..-..--- lO
NlO v <Df'-
LOI.D'<1"l'-iN
NNN"-jO:>
I
I
M(,,)N(o~
~~;;~I~
1'-(")(0 "<T 0
Q) I.l) co Q) N
'"
,
mO"'---(o<D
1'-0 N(o (0
NN 0.1...... co
1"-0l.!)(Ooo
~ N
1'-0C'.l.....0
~ ~'"
MMNLO!(,,)
,~
I
i
o .. 0 NI'"
~",0..1~
2::2:22ro
<1:<:3.::<:3.::<1:"0
01l10lt)1-
0......(")"""
coO::icoCci
0000
'"
'"
..
N
'"
<0
o
..
00'"
'<1"~6
"'''''''
"-<"ir--.:
;;CON
0"_
'" . .
(O~LO
<0
'"
N
..enN
'" . .
"'....
N
-"'~
v""":6
'" """
.... . .
",~N
_....~
'"
....
o
'"
<ONN
O:>'----u-:i
';:'(")...--
O<O~
Nr--.:<"'i
:;(D('")
<00'"
lO""":ci
o N
'"
00'"
tOcici
..
"'O~
('")('>.jo
N
....0'"
LOa:i6
~
Cij<f'<f'
o.~-
I- 02
--0 0. 0
C Q>--
ro<(
i5
<0
N
~
ci.ro
;0-0
;<(1-
I
~l\
s
E .
21 2
LL-I ~
L__
I ~
Ia.m
lO-a:
i<1:1-
'"
....
<0
ro
..
.cl ~
~I J
E-
21 2
u. ~
1>--
I"'
:i
i
I,,-~
~
m
~I .-l
WI
Ei
o. ,::
u:; .c
>--
I~
I I~~
, ,
I I
I
I ~II ~ ~
I Z
I E ~
I 2 ::I <(
E 0
! LL- I- <:?
'"
If
Ii
1-
i::c
, '"
'i?
'"
..
'"
N
o <0
N N
0<0'"
-a
"'<0'"
'" .'"
00",
-'"
0"''"
2'criN
en 0
en '"
'" N
~N'"
.. .'"
N'"
N
....'"
a
0"'<0
;:r!~
'"
'" ..
N '"
NOO
o .'"
N~
"''''0
"' .'"
;?~N
"''''-
a
<0 '"
'"
-0
........~
~--i
..
"'....-
'"
N
"'
~~
'"
ci
'"
'"
o
'"
'"
N
~
"-"'
ON
o
,;;
o
o
'"
N
'"
'"
'"
~
"-<0
~~
,;;
o
..
'"
o
"'
o
'"
N
~
"--
"'
,;;
o
;!
'"
~
o.~
~ i:;~~'--
cr D...(") '"
0..
~ Cl. 0
~..
Q) 0 c:: ll) ell) 0..... III
IE EgE<1lEt5EE
i= 00~~.2ro.c~
Co u: ~ g ~ g ~ ~g
U5 ~ -E ~ :il
I- ..no..
o
~
"
~
"-
~
"-'"
o
'"
..
o
;; 00
"'00
V "'", .
00 0>
ci
'" ;;; '" "'N
00 '" "'~
0> 0 N NO>
ci ci
0000 00
~,-'
'O"~
" .~ N
I"-~N
~
"'00 V :;r::
'" .....
N'O
N V
;.:
0
'" '" '" "''''
;;; '" 'O 'Ooo
oo
6 6
"'....v ;':
(,Ooo::i"-
00
0000 00
~<ri
:>;
0000> <('"
N .00 'OM
~g V
;.: .
0
'" N 00 "'00
N 00 <OM
'" 'O 'O'"
6 N 0
00><0 0
.... .00 oo
o)~N N
"'0.... V
"-c.)C\) ....
~l{)(\J N
:>;
OO~O <(N
N,-' 'O~
;.:
0
'" '" <0 v'"
.... 00 ~'"
'" '"
ci 6
0
~ ~NOO 00
ro ~<ri
ID N
(L
:>;
<( "'v~ 00
'O <ri
"
oo
0
0:>; :>;
......<(N'VN <(oo
~l!)Nu::i 'O
<(~ 'O
l.f)r:..: ;.:
vo 0
N
(; ..-- c: Q) C oJ) 15""; Q) 0:
13 E .Q E oJ) E U ~ E u .
ro Ot).2~.2m..c'=-rn
"- U: Ql 0 m 0 u.,oJ 0 l.L
~ ,-~>CL>..'<:I>X
ro ::> <ll LO r1) I1J
ID o C '7_ (lJ <ll
(L I- r:...o.. 0...
~ 0
ro
m
(L
.
.
o
.~
-
~
o
o
==
~
l-
I--
.
N
>
Q)
~
Ol
u
>.
Ol
-0
oil
Q)
>
<(
Q)
c
E
Ol
Ie'lLO
~o
e'lLOO
~~N
l!)-q--
~~I'--
-.:::tO~
't"-O-.:::t~
-
-
Q) Q) Q)
E-01ilo
OlOOZ
ZOt:::Q)
Q)Q)0l'"
-:t=_co
lL(!)(!)(J..
o
I--
-
E
o
o
"<to
"<tc
COco
C'?_
, CO
(l)u
t---o
'71j::
NCO
~ '-
Wj
Q)
U
c
m
~
-
C
Q)
Q)
~
m
u
>.
m
D
O/lZ
Q)2
~..<!!
Q)I
c
c
E.g)
m ~
I<(
()
-,;;
o
>-
(0')(')1'-(")1'",
IOGlvC":lC"\j
NNC")C")!~
__L
:g
, .-
in. m
~~
f.ONmCOI.()
N
,--
'I' ~ OI.()Nf'--IOOl
V> ~ ""':1 -.-
ID I
SiI' !
~ ::; r,;~o 0000
"=n--=
h--j.;- ON'"'",
'" ,-
0:
o.<U1
0.01
<C >-1
lO"1"I!)O)fO
r---Ol!)MI'-
-.-NNNCO
"'~'\i
- ~
~
o
UJ
~12
"- i=
I
! tiT""
0:
c)MC"')C")t---tD
O<:tOl-.-O"<t
"...:l'-0ll.(){")1.f)
; -'--'-NNOCl
-0
ID
'"
~I
5!
'r--
~i
<=1
.;::i
0.,
,
:3J
~I
0,
(;j
iO"-N-'-NCD
!ci.m:
:;;-0:
:.......1-'
NNONtD
I
4:: i I
~',~~N_OT
J: ~ i~:o 0 0 0 0
>-
-.-(Ql[)N(D
-.-l.l)-.--.-Q)
Mt")C")MN
-.-oor--!co
-.--.--.- 'C"')
ml'-lDt.Oico
N
00000
N(")1ONN
Nt--I'-'<:f",O
NeoNa,N
NNNN:(J)
I'--..:r-coo:m
-.;;tomN'1O
-.- co -.- 0:0)
NNNN:OO
-.-C")ONW
v'<t"NNN
N-'--'--'-I.[)
0000.0
, i
, ,
~ ,010 -.- 0 -.- N N C") -.- ...-'1"-
~'1
1'-10(1')"<:1"0)
(D ro co co ...--
,,",
I
'" ~ ,~_ 0 N NI"'
-g! I
Z, I
15: 2 !olflom-'--!lf)
tt .c ,..--:coror--rolg
>-
ci.ro
,0.(5
<(I-,
:c .<e>_",NJ"
(i !
I
i
ID ;; 2, 222, II"
E t5 0... 0... n.. 0... 0:
i= ltIOl()Ol()1--
t:: LLO-.-("')'<1"
t\'I ~::t.::t-.i
Uj 00001
'<t"1'-(D(J):(D
r--r---l'-mN
'"'
-.-C'f)N-.-,1'-
ONt"')l,{)O
1'-1'-1'-0)..-
'"'
C"){"\J.....0?CJ)
::?:~2::;::;:ro
rLil..o...o...o
01.0 0 t.{) I-
0'---('")00:::1"
tijli).nl.O
0000
O-.-'<j"C")!CO
NQ}-O CO!O)
C") ('<) '<t" C'Ji:!
";-0) ~ cn!T""""-
T"""" !(")
C'lNlO<:')(")
00000
T"""" t-- r--- <:')C(}
tnCOCOT"""";{>)
t-- '<;f- If) to;"<t
N
NlO"<t"1":l.!)
'-
"1"T"""".q-r.QlO
r---"1"ll)I.l).N
N
ONOT"""":C"')
NCI')C"')'<T.N
T""""T""""N",.r---
00000
COlONr---iN
rn lD 0> -.:::tl{")
(") N T"""" T""""lm
Or--- r--- o:-.:::t
_ N
-..:t '" T"""" o!ro
000 0,0
CD -..:t to O!tO
-- -f--
NlJ)I.OlJ)ir---
l!)-..:t "'1" C'?!t;:
N N0J Mio>
OON(")T"""":-..:t
-..:t-q'<:tC"?:r.Q
NT""""OT""""''<:t
(")N{")N'O
T""""NT""""T"""":l!)
00000
N
"'
'"
"
'"
:::
"
N
"'''''"'
"' . ,
"' ~
"'
000
00
N~~
"' . .
,,-
"
"'
;::;
N
....
.,;
"
"'....N
"' . .
N_
"'",N
'"' . .
N~~
"''''''
T""""ao
o '"
" 0
-"'"
NNa
"'
000
cici
T""""N......T"""":l!) 040NT""""'ID mIDo:;t
T""""r---:ci
"
ro"'--T""""NN
{"')(")(')T"""".T""""
N(,,)(,)(,,)N
OT""""NT""""-.:::t
\000...,.0
{"')04NOOO
N(")CI')(")T""""
Nomr---m
~ N
'"
<C
w
'"
'"
2::222m
<:(<{<:(<{o
Ol.()Ol!)f-
0T""""(")'<t
r:..:,.-....:~~
0000
(')...--r---O.T""""
r---OQ")T"""",N
NNT""""T""""t--
......OT""""004
(")l.()'<:tON
lDOJ(")T""""C>
N................r---
O)l.DNOt---
2222(0
<{<(<{<{o
Ol!)OtOr-
o....."'-..:t
coicicoC::.i
0000
'"
....
"'
N
'--:
N
"'
00"""
""'00
...."'"
'" ' .
,,<00
N"'"'
'"''''"'
<0 ' .
N_
7C"0!2.'#
o.r::-
f-u.E
1? ~~
~<C
(')
N
>
III
~
'"
0
>.
'"
U
06
III
>
<(
III
c
E
rn
:r: <'? II)
, ~ CO
<'? II) CO
~ ~N
II) -q~
~ ~t---
-q CO~
~ CO -q N
III Ql III
EUmo
",ooz
zO-r::Ql
QJQ)mQ)
==~.......ro
LL(/)(/)o...
-
-
C E
I- 0
- u
() -.::t u
-.::t C
s::::: CO .-
- MJ:j
~ I m
(J)-o
- I'--U
~ M .-
C ,:;::
Nm
..- '--
() <.D -
:e i
~
~
I-
" )
r~1 0> '" "' ""
"" ~ ;;; 0",
M MN ""M
""
0> 0>
EI 0 0
!
ci.m '" 0 ~"" .... N N~
0.- M ~"' M - ~....
<('" '" ....
0 0
.
'" "'........ 0> """'~ ~
1ii ID N ' -,..:
~ M
ID .... M
SI
Ef----'
01 ~ 000 0 000 0
It ..c I 0 0
f-
1 I 2 2
L I OMM o..N <'>N.... <(....
I ~0 N '
~I 0 N 0
N 0 "' "1
.0 ....
0 0
._-
ci.ro! M .... ....0 0> '" ~ '"
~ '" "' ",N '" "' '"
0> N N '" N '"
0 0
L' ~ ~~"" "" ~ '" "" ""
N ' ~0
"51 -.J N
o ,
'"
E 0 ~NO 0 0>,""" "'
0
"= .c :g~~ "' 0> . '" '"
N _0
f- '"
" 2
:c ........M o..M "'MO <(~
'" 0 ';> N ~
iI' "
I .;-; ....
i-------:--~ 0 0 .
IHI 0 "" ""'" M M ""~
N
"' '"
0 0
I ,
~ ,,"o~ N ...."'N M
I ill' 0 '"
~I ~ "" '"
EI
ei 2 000 0 000 0
"-I L 0 0
f-
2 2
:c "'OM o..N ",N~ <(~
'" 0 0 0 ~
jj' I "' 0 "" ""
I .;-; ,..:
0 0
Io.rol '" .... """' .... ;;; _N
'a....... ;;; .... "'''" "" M7
I<C 0 0> N <'> MO>
I f- ~ 0 0
~. 15 15
~ "''''M N ~ ~,,"N
LI ID m N m 0
" ~ ,ID ID
11 ,0... 0..
'2 2
0 <( NON ;;; <( ...."'0 0
.c g~r---- ~u)RJ N
"-I 0 '" M
f- 'M " ~O>
,'.
N '"
,~ 0
02 2 02 2
:c -Il..OCll()N o..~ -<(U"'lcom <(0
'" 20 N '" ZtflMN "'~
iI' 0..,.-, 7 <C_
O~ 'i <Di-..: ,..:
, 00 0 ,,"0 0
f----~-.:_t N
i (!) OCm~())'-~(j)>-- "--C<D-<D'-....;m'-
. E OECEOCEO E.QE~E~E:E.g
I .- E:;:; <l) 13 - t5 .
I- Oo~2~m..c.2rn ot5.:'E'2ro..c.2ro
, t Li: ~ g tf -;; u.. _Q)!; LL u:::VOIDOLLQ)OLL
rn ''""- '- ~I.Y .....~>O"'>.YI>..::.::
(iJ :3 %) ~ :g ~ ~Q) om co
!I- lrjo... (L ~E ~~ ~
~ 0 ~ 0
m m
ID ID
'0.. 0..
.
.
.
()
Hamline Ave & Hwy 96
2005 A.M. Peak Hour
t,..')
"
Arden Hills Office Park
Arden Hills, MN
..J- -t- -(- '-,\ t r \. +.;
_lII!lIIlJii!llSiv~~__&_B'=I1I!~"uel'E'IJ1WV_lll!I\!l"ilillililY_'dlI!__
~~~-
Lane Configurations "i tt l' "i"i tt l' "i .t l' .t'
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900, 1900 .1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900" 19DO. 19(1O}:190b
Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4,0 4.0 4.0
Lane UtiI. Factor 1.00" 0,95.1.00 0.97 0.95, 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00
Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85
Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.96
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3539 1583 3433 3539 1583 1681 1705
Fit Permitted 0,95"tOO 1,00 0.95 1,00 1.00 0.95 0.96
Satd.Flow(perm) 1770 3539 1583 3433 3539 1583 1681 1705
Volume (vph) 10 775 266 970 ,1119 23 69 10
Peak-hour factor. PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96
Adj. Flow (vph) 10' 807 277 1010 1166 24 72 10
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 10 807 277 1010 1166 15 40 42
Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Perm Split
Protected Phases 5 2 4
Permitted Phases 6 2
Actuated Green, G (s) 0.6 20.1 20.1 23.1 42.6 42.6
Effective Green, g (s) 0.6 22.1 22.1 23.1 44.6 44.6
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.01 0.32 0.32 0.33 0.64 0.64
Clearance Time (s) 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane GrpCap (vph) 15 1117 500 1133 2255 1009
vis Ratio Prot 0.01 cO.23 cO.29 0.33
vis Ratio Perm 0.17
vlc Ratio 0.67 0.72 0.55
Uniform Delay, dl 34.6 21.2 19.9
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 75.9 4.1 4.4
Delay (s) 110.5 25.3 24.2
Level of Service FCC
Approach Delay (s) 25.8
Approach LOS C
l~r,
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group
0.89
22.3
1.00
9.1
31.3
C
0.01
0.02
4.7
1.00
0.0
4.7
A
0.52
6.9
1.00
0.9
7.7
A
185
B
4.2
5.2
0.07
5.0
3.0
125
0.02
4.2
5.2
0.07
5.0
3.0
127
cO.02
116
9
Perm
4
o
'0
Split
3. .a
Perm
3
3.6
0.05
4.0
3.0
81
0.00
0.01
31.5
1.00
0.1
31.6
C
HCM Level of Service
C
21.7
0.72
70.0
67.9%
15
Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service
0.32
30.7
1.00
1.5
32.2
C
0.33
30.7
1.00
1.5
32.3
C
31.2
C
o 22
17 '. 1
5/9/2005
TDI
4
4.2
5.2
0.07
5.0
3.0
118
3.6
0.05
4.0
3.0 .
93
cO.Ol
0.01
0.08
30.2
1.00
0.3
30.5
C
0.18
31.8
1.00
1.0
32.7
C
C
16.0
C
Synchro 6 Report
Page 1
()
Hamline Ave & Karth Lake Cr
2005 A.M. Peak Hour
Arden Hills Office Park
Arden Hills, MN
.
/- _~ -f"-"'-,\ t ~ \. +.1
litiNej!jJ~.a~lllllllllr~~~~
~~;: g~~~';lurations St~' .... .... Si~ 'I Fre:... F~~';e<;I~I~
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
Volume (veh/h) 6 15 199 5 4 .12Q3 "))J3.~
Peak Hour Factor 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87
Hourly flow rate (vph) 7 17 229 6
Pedestrians
Lane Width (It)
Walking Speed (ftls)
Percent Blockage
Righi turn flare (veh)
Median type None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (It)
pX. platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 1682 1698 232 1423 234
vC1, stage 1 coni vol
vC2, stage 2 coni vol
vCu, unblocked vol 1682 1681 711 993 1698 232 1423 234
tC, single (s) 7.5 6.9 6.5 6.9 4.1 4.1
tC. 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2
pO queue Iree % 73 100 93 96 100 99 96 100
cM capacity (veh/h) 59 90 375 180 88 771 474 1330
ri-nr_i~.F-"IL'2;3llil.lE'lni"~'_"_~lla""~'''''''''''''''.~t\1',..,)_..r',,,-@.ITlnt-l_'E';';_;'l"~:'~ ill
J,;!,JJ:~1$:lJ)'i~~~!Bll!Il{r,R8JIL~&~~;:,:" "':;~QU~jjffi!FA~14(E~~nlliklj)liilllW0WillJ1EBf00~;JL5~i~~ii:Il1tl~",
Volume Total 43 15 17 234 696 732
Volume Lelt 16 8 17 0 5 0
Volume Righi 26 6 0 40
cSH 124 279 474 1700 1330 1700
Volume 10 Capacity 0.34 0.05 0.04 0.14 0.00 0.43
Queue Length 95th (ft) 34 4 3 0 0 0
Control Delay (s) 48.4 18.7 12.9 0.0 0.1 0.0
Lane LOS E C B A
Approach Delay (s) 48.4 18.7 0.9 0.0
Approach LOS E C
.
Average Delay
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
1.5
47.2%
15
ICU Level of Service
A
5/9/2005
Synchro 6 Report
Page 1
.
TDI
.
.
.
Hamline Ave & Hwy 96
2005 P.M. Peak Hour
~. )
Arden Hills Office Park
Arden Hills, MN
.-i- _," -/'"- '-,,\ t!' '.!';
_~1fiIiJij1_-f:!e;!ij!I1II_! ..~"".~_-=,,-____
u
Lane Configurations lj tt ." ljlj tt ." lj 4"" 4"'"
M;l~r;f~w.(Ypllpl) . 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1$0~~~.tf~119JJjJ; '~~{J.~;.19oo J90qirlH~'iqf!!
Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
~~ne'l.tJtil:,Facli:>f 1.00 0.95 1.00
Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1
F~"'!otE1Cted. 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3539 1583 3433
J'lt,'f~i-Q1jtted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3539 1583 3433
VO[llfr)e;-(liphp 10 1092 100 202
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98
Ad}. fl6w (vph) . 10 1114 102 206
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0
Lane,Group Flow (vph) 10 1114 102 206
Turn Type Prot Perm Prot
prCrtecteCl. PhaSes 1 6 5
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated glC Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle. Extension (s)
Lane Grp Ca p (vph)
vis Ratio Prot"
vis Ratio Perm
vie Ratio' 1.25
Uniform Delay, dl 44.8
Progression.Factor 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 416.4
Delay (s) 461.2
Level of SeNice F
Approach Delay {s)
Approach LOS
0.4
0.4
0.00
4.0
3.0
8
0.01
25.4
27.4
0.30
6.0
3.0
1077
cO.31
1.03
31.3
1.00
36.7
68.0
E
.67.5
E
6
25.4
27.4
0.30
6.0
3.0
482
6.0
6.0
0.07
4.0
3.0
229
cO.06
1
1.00
3539
1.00
3539
1058
0.98
1080
o
1080
31.0
33.0
0.37
6.0
3.0
1298
0.31
0.83
26.0
1.00
6.3
32.3
C
39.1
D
1583 1
1.00; Q,ilS 0.95,
1583 1681 1688
"6.' 24).' 'I'~
0.98 0.98 0.98
1583
1,100; .
1583
1'''71~: -
0.98
1
0.97'
1804
., .;9""
0.98
Perm
2
31.0
33.0
0.37
6.0
3.0
580
0.00
0.00
18.1
1.00
0.0
lRl
B
4
2
, .123
Split
4
36.0
37.0
0,41
5.0
3.0,
691
0.07
0.18
16.8
1.00
0.1
17.0
B
17
0.98
1583
,-11,00
1583
;i~~0t)~)~
0.98
4
o
0.,
Split
3
26
itU@;ji):~
127 603
Perm
,36.0
37.0
0.41
5.0
3,0
694
0.08
0.18.
16.9
1.00
0.1
17.0
B
4
36.0
37.0
0.41
5.0
3.0
651
3.6
0.04
4.0
3.D
72
Perm
3.6
. 0~04
4.0
,3.0
63
0.00
0.01
41.5
1.00
0.0
41.5
D
HCM Average Control Delay
HCM'Volume 10 Capacity ratio
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Ihteisecli6riCapacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical lane Group
0.06
0.21
23.3
1.00
1.0
24.3
C
0.90
41.7
1.00
33.4
75.1
E
Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of .Service
cO.38
0.93
25.2
1.00
19.2
44.5
D
0.36
42.1
1.00
3.1
45.2
D
44.0
D
51912005
TDI
D
16.0
E
Synchro 6 Report
Page 1
(j
Hamline Ave & Karth Lake Cr
2005 P.M. Peak Hour
Arden Hills Office Park
Arden Hills, MN
..J- -l- -f- '-~ t 1'). +.;
--__"".,_IlII__I'__yAl____--.1flla____
~_t~_i_~
Lane Configurations 4> 4> 'I.. 4'..
Sign Control SloP: Stop' . " . Eree . ,<.: ,:"'f;:f;;i':j;;:::~fre~Cj;~'j
Grade 0% 0% 0%" ..,~, O%.'_~" .
Volume (veh/h)
Peak Hour Eactor
Hourly flow rate (vph)
Pedestrians
lane Width (II)
Walking Speed (ftIs)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
upstream signal (II)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume 1528 1527 174 1364 1528
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC, 2 stage (5)
tE (s)
pO queue free %
cM capacity (vehlh)
None
None
1528 1527
7.5 6.5
348
4.1
1105
174 1364 1528 1101
6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9
3.5
60
75
4.0
100
112
3.3
98
839
3.3
96
207
22
98
1207
3.5
94
101
4.0
100
112
~~""__~_!4tJllm.jj~"'~j'__~"'ljjiill'1!il!a"'iB1''''~'''.,-~"".Cl!.___ltr_
~^'~~~!~'Wi~~t~!L(~~4~~~?!J~~*K-ltlgl~~~~~:~~mDmll&:'l~Mlli~~
Volume Total 45 14 30 1105 179 178 . "I;n,:':;l;;,;;;I:.:
Volume Lell 30 6 30 0 9 0
VolumeRight 0 7 8
cSH 107 144 1207 1700 628 1700
Volume to Capacity 0.42 0,10 0.02 0.65 0.01 0.10
Queue Length 95th (It) 44 8 2 0 1 0
COhtrolDelay (s) 60.632.6 8.1 0.0 0.7'. 0.0
Lane LOS E D A A
Approach Delay (s) 60.6 32.6 02 0.4
Approach LOS E D
2.3
60.9%
15
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
ICU Level of Service
B
5/9/2005
TDI
Synchro 6 Report
Page 1
.
.
.
.
.
.
()
Hamline Ave & Hwy 96
2007 A.M. Peak Hour - No-Build
~.. )
Arden Hills Office Park
Arden Hills, MN
.-f _. -1- '-.... t t" \. -l-./
il.."p.-.--....-!ll"'~I?~......-IIIIB~~
~~"itZ
Lane Configurations.", tt .r.'1'1 ....ft t'I<4 .r ". ....4 ."{f
Id"al..Flpw (vphpl) . 190'0',.....1 ~()(klj9.00..I.jlji1.Qinl~lj~@@jlj1,il;l1i@@~lj!)!)I@:-rtlj,~KK,&1t~~I~limjl~~i@*lj~,l:t;~~
Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lane UtiI' Factor
Frt
Fit Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Fit Perrr\itted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Vplume(vpti)
Peak-hour factor. PHF
Adj. Flow (Vph)
RTOR Reduction (vph)
lane GtoupF'low (vpti)
Turn Type
Protected Phases
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green. G (s)
Effective Green, g (s)
ActuatedglC Ratio
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
vis Ratio Prot
vis Ratio Perm
vlc Ratio 0.71 ();79
Uniform Delay, d1 37.1 23.8
Progression Factor 1.00' 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 100'.1 5.9
Delay (s) 137.2 29.7
Level of Service F C
Approach Delay(s) 30'.2
Approach LOS C B C
!~$[~iI1!!i1!:i~lil@l'~~iii!lt~~
HCM Average Control Delay 23.6 HCM Level of Service C
HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0'.75
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 75.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.2%
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
1.0'0
0'.95
1770
0'.95
1770'
10'
0'.96
10'
o
10'
Prot
0.6
0.6
0.0'1
4.0'
3.0'
14
0.0'.1
1,.00'
3539
820'
0'.96
854
a
854
20'.9
22.9
0'.31
6.0
3.0'
10'81
ca.24
. .1.0!)
1583
280
0.96
292.
Perm
20.9
22.9
0'.31
6.0'
3.0'
483
1583 1681
. 1:.9.0 ' j,J.o!),,,'j o":i95~ i.o~ ~ jfflD
3539 1583 1681 170'2 1583
, H90.1'\,,1';'I~O'7':i '{mi. .ji'(:o""'., 140:
0.96 0.96 0'.96 0'.96 0.96
..'i,.Jli~,8l1 ,1iQl:l
1817 1583
110.,"1"110.';1;7,20
, cd',--"....""" ..' ~,,"'~'.'~-C' ':Cf""""'"'-i.
0'.96 0.96 0'.96
a
1rp7';3; ,1246 I
Prot
7
141
Perm
o
"Iiijit;,., 48",,11';2",
20",11:1',1
.'w'...'''''.. .".....
Perm
Perm
3.0'
87
4.0
.1 3_0
76
0.18
0.60'
22.2
1.00'
5.5
27.7
C
0'.0'1
a.(J1
4.8
1.00'
0'.0
4.8
A
0'.0'1
0'_09
31.6
0..23 .
34.4
0'.0'0
0';(:11
34.0
0.54
7.3
1.00'
0'.9
8.2
A
0.90'
23.2
1.00
9.1
32.3
C
.0131
32.2
1.0'0'
1.3
33.5
C
0'.33
32.3
1.3
33.6
C
0.3
31.9
C
35.7
D
34.1
C
Sum lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service
16.0
C
5/9/2005
TDI
Synchro 6 Report
Page 1
()
Hamline Ave & Karth Lake Cr
2007 A.M. Peak Hour - No-Build
Arden Hills Office Park
Arden Hills, MN
.
..J- _.....- '-'" t!'" '. +.;
----~
Lane Configurations 4> 4>. .~. u1>.uu. ... .... ..4'1>__ ...
$1911:rtt9'nff4Ii' :\:j:;F':';~'f!~~):~1W;'~~;!$:t:$p~';, ,m ;,",,';,' i-;"'::;l~~9A1i!',>:> n:i~\mll!t~~,~~lnmf~~l:~i~~U~~illN[~m~i~~~~lit~ff~~~n%fJ,;:;' .'.
Grade 0% .0% .._u... .O'i,u. .. 0%
Pedestrians
Lane Width (It) -.
Walking Speed (tus)
Percent.Btockage.
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (It)
pX, piatoon unblocked
vC, conflIcting volume 1805 1805 . 753
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 coni vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC; single (s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 4.0 3.3 3.5
pO queue Iree % 75 100 93 93
cM capacity (veh/h) 74 352 157
m~til~ml{{;:iII~I1III~~~~
Volume Total 34 23 23 253 741 776. .
Volume Lelt 11 11 23 0 11 0
Volume Right 23
cSH 111
Volume to Capacity 0.31
Queue Length 95th (It) 30
Control Delay (s) 51.6
Lane LOS F
Approach Delay (s) 51.6
Approach LOS F
1805 1805
6.5
99
.
259
0.09
7
20.2
C
20.2
C
441
0.05
4
1700
0.15
o
0.01
1
0.46
o
0.0
1.1
Intersection Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
ICU Level of Service
A
5/9/2005
Synchro 6 Report
Page 1
.
TOI
.
.
.
(~)
,,-_..~"-
i
'.
Hamline Ave & Hwy 96
2007 P.M. Peak Hour - No-Build
Arden Hills Office Park
Arden Hills, MN
/ -,. ('"+-",--,\ t I' '.!-';
~~~~1!lI
Lane Configurations "i tt ." "i"i tt ." "i 4" ."
Ideal Ft~{vl1flfiir ,j ". "'1900,. .19QOt:!~.!IDP:r:I::l:~O~"'iJ~6q',.1~g::-0iij19Q!l. 19DQ:;,1900'
Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
LaneUtif;F~€!f.Y:' i~-OO' '():'.l!!f~:J~i!I'!,...o;S!'l:;'o;9.s'1t~~':?Q;95 I. 0.95 .', 1.00
Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85
FII Protected.; . &~? ,.1:\Q!Js~i;: 1~'Ua'li:.Qj;9.!!1-;:.t~p.;1:0a:t. Q'Q5. .OLSs>: 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3539 1583 3433 3539 1583 1681 1691 1583
F".P'e""'tted' ... '. . · .'0'95. ' ..-ron.-:- . 1'1"""""""0.'''''''"''.#0'0'' '1. hnO" "b. '1'0' "6':. 1'10 O.
"....Hi....,- 'm.t'~ ,,"':,m:::<:c;;<:'(.., ,-,:,::".;".',,:yc.:;:;f?;f:.1J?'f':'i:;\ i.;~~?S:C0:{";~0;~\g:i0,;'4;::,,' '::;-::-'11::: ;;,yy';:;'}L ,,~~hl/,:i>,':;;;1,,'.:::,;>.':..~.: .....::,
Satd.Flo';" (perm) 1770 3539. 1583 -3433'.~3539u1583 16811691 1583
Volume (vph),......., / 10" .1'1~)':t~~or'4t.2'.Ji.a,i.j:140.':'...-iO ;:}~JlP' to. '10"150
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 .0.98 - 0:98 '0..98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98
Adj. FloW (vph).:li' , 10 1i84.:'tl?i.::.iJ~"1;143',I;.C:;::10:.265 .10',7.65
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 98
Lane GrQ\.ip ,ft6wj{vphj. .1-f!,i1184::),::;!;t[1;;2: :.214--':' nit3'f):-~.4:::::'l34c. .1-41:: 667
Turn Type .., Prot Perm ~rot Per';! Split Perm
ProlectedPhases.li '..'1:-: 'j:6i';:;.g:',., ...-..-.5;;/..,52i ::"'J;'- .i 4 .;.. .4."
Permitted Phases 6 2
Actuated Green;.G.(s)
Effective Green, g (s)
Actuated glC Ratio..
Clearance Time (s)
Vehicle Extension (s)
Lane Grp Cap (vph)
vts Ralio Prol .
vis Ratio Perm
vlc Ratio
Uniform Delay, dl 59.8 40.3
Progression Factor 1.00
Incremental Delay. d2 647.5
Delay (s) 707.3
Level of Service F
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
0.4
39.4
39.4
8.0
4.0
3.0.
6
0.01
.2
71.5
E
0.9
.30.1
C
41.4
97.1
F
5.7
38.5
D
0.0
22:3
C
0.1
20.4
C
0.1
20.5
C
46.2
D
E
4
52.0
53.0
5.0
3.0"
699
c0.42
0,95
32.3
1.0"0
23.2
55.5
E
1900
20
0.98
20"
o
o
Split
3
}-~~'llliIl_:liIl_
J~f" ,. ,', ". . L: "ik~ ' . ,1tHt '" _, ,,' ' z
HCM Average Control Delay 56.2 HCM Level of Service E
HCM:Volumelo'Capa<;ityratio
Acluated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection CapacilyUtilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group
91.8%
15
Sum of losl time (s)
ICU Level of Service
16.0
F
5/9/2005
TDI
Synchro 6 Report
Page 1
,'j
,
'---...-'
Hamline Ave & Karth Lake Cr
2007 P.M. Peak Hour - No-Build
Arden Hills Office Park
Arden Hills, MN
.-1- -"'t -('- '-,\ t I" \. +.,;
_~___i%JfIflllI\OOl~__!3;____"__
~~~~~.\M1~~11i~~"",Ii!!lBE'iBEt~~~=~~~,~*H~RmI
LaneC??figur~tions ... ..... ... .... ..4>, .... 4>, . 'I to +tto
Sl!!i!'lii.€.>"uQ!fgl;K.":. . . "'.S!O~ .,l',;SfClPi.'; Free Free
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
980 10 10 31010
0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87
1126 11 11 356. .
360
1138
, stage
v€2,:stage.2 cont vbl..
v€u, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
t€. 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
pO queue free
cM capacity (veh/h)
-~~,.~
Volume Total
Volume Left
Volume Right
cSH
Volume to €apacity
Queue Length 95th (ft)
€ontrol [Yelay (s)
Lane LOS
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
1592 1132 368
6.5 6.9 4.1
1138
4.1
~ ~ ~ D e U
47 100 99 88 100 94 97 98
65 101 .827 93 101 1187 610
""'PJIlhU"i"i.I_:",.-.,"""_,,,"'''a''lt:~'!fjglt=='''=._le'''''':.__._"'"
~~~_!lm~%~~m~1€Ut;ttiNj$N~~TI:i~~~~4$i~kf
46 23 34 1138 190 190
34 11 34 0 11 0
85 1187 1700 610 1700
0.54 0.18 0.03 0.67 0.02 0.11
60 16 2 0 1 0
89.3 39.8 8.1 0.0 0.9 . O;{)
F E A A
89.3 39.8 0.2 0.4
F E
Average Delay
Intersection €9pacily Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
3.4
82.3%
15
I€U Level of Service
B
5/9/2005
Synchro 8 Report
Page 1
TDI
.
.
.
C)
()
Hamline Ave and Hwy 96
2007 A.M. Peak Hour - Build
Arden Hills Office Park
Arden Hills, MN
.
/ - " -f - -\.. "\ t ;+- '. J. ./
~~
r 4"'
'1~Q9rnDl~~~irn'if1~1\!Jm;f;f;f;fm!1;~
4.0 4.0 4.0
Lane Configurations , ++ ,
t~'"t~I1\'~ l~~llfJ'. ?;~~]J;!J1""Q9;' t900',;f'1'!i:OO;
Total Losttime ls) . 4.0 4.0 4.0
E:~li~'JJfifFi\ei(5~ .u';;?"~O!}' ,i:01l:!P') ,;~'Po
Frt 1.00 1.00' 0.85
Fit I;l~Qlitliled i:;"; ,-; .~;J,:ii'Th;'"9.5I<, HIO ".11 ;00
Sa'td Flow (pr~t) , "17703539 1583
F~l'/tJ) I @~d :i:,!!ii;f;f.'!:ii,1;fi?1:!}5:; -11.90 1,00
Said. Flow (perm) 1770 3539 1583
Yofu.me. (~I1~)'!\'!i"ii;!' >.;f:!~Q!"820 , 280 .
Peak-hour factor, PHI" ' .0.96. 0.96 0.96
A".""I ..(5"~J'''.' ,. ,.,.."U.fo,." . d"42nZ
..... .~Fit::9:~_ :XQ~i:?:;: 'L'::\5L3;?",,~\1;'1;;(: gi~;::i';:_c;;r,,-?'_..' Y"v"';
RTOR Reduction (vphf . 0.. 0 0
I:fjlie~I'(;\i;lI'[IT-[Q~ (vPrr;;:j;.!!JO;,<!54," 292
Turn Type Prot Perm
l?fO~~I'lq;iPhasl\s.' '.-('ii!,.' ';1 ' 6 ,.
Permitted Phases ." .
Actu.at~dGreen, G{s)',;,Q:6-'
Effective Green, g (s) 0.6
Adli.taied glC Ratio ' 0.01.
Clearance Time (s) 4.0
Vehicle Extensiqn (s) 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 14
vfs Ratio Piot'... . . ' 0.Q1
vis RaHo Perm
vl!;R~io .,..
Uniform Delay, d1
I"roQ,es$ion Factor
Incremental Delay, d2
Delay.(s)
Level of Service
Approach Delay (s)
Approach LOS
0.85
-Loa! .
1583
.1.00-,;,..
1583
156
0.96
1.00
'. ..tk\!~'lli 'i~1lO
1817 1583
?;fli!;f~;!i;:lf~
1817 1583
. " 19 ?;.~o!!,-;29
0.96 0.96 0.96
o
o
o 20
,.-......L..."._.,._."..".._..
:r',%i::2CMli~11'i!filt,t
Perm
6
2
46.4 46.4 5.4 5.4
48.4 48.4 6.4 6.4 6.4
0.65 0.65 0.09 0.09
6.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0.'.
2284 1022 143 145 135
0.35 0.03 CO,03
3
20.5
22.5
0.;l0
6.0
;l.0
1062
c0.24
26.5
26.5
0.35
4.0
3.0
1213
cO.32
22.5
0.30.
6.0
3.0
475
3.6 3.6
4.0
3.0 .3.0.
87 76
.
0.18
0.61
22.5
1,00.
5.8
28.4
C
0.01 0.01
0.90 0.55 0.0.1 0.31 0.33 0.10
23.0 7.3 4.8 32.2 32.3 31.6
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
9.4 0.9 0.0 1.3 1.3 0.3
32.5 8.2 4.8 33.5 33.6 32.0
C A A C C C
19.4 32,6
B C
0.00
0.23. 0.01
34.4 34.0
1..00 1,00
1.4 0.1
35.7 34.1
D C
0.:80
24.2
1.00
6.5
30.7
C
31.0
C
..0..71
37.1
1.00. .
100.1
137.2
I"
_~~Jllimtr(~_1lIinL~~~ilE1l1ii~~~~__
HCM Average Control Delay 24.0 HCM Level of Service C
1--lCM\(plumeloCapaC:ityratio M6
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 75.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0
InterEiectioncapaqityUlilizaHon 71.8% ICU Level of Service C
Analysis Period (min) 15
G CrijicalLaneGroup
.
5/9/2005
Synchro 6 Report
Page 1
TDI
C)
~-'
Hamline Ave & Karth Lake Cr
2007 A.M. Peak Hour - Build
Arden Hills Office Park
Arden Hills, MN
-...f"- ,...., t,..
_E__"1\_.~_"''''''''''-''Tfj!j,..''T'H.IlfIl!>J!ijll2i!'"__~
iU~f~~~Jf~r!~_
Lane Configurations 4+ 4+ 'i 1+ 41+
!!jJ~iI?k1liJ),rli!ih~i!it~j " , SlOp Stop Free,\Fre\'l
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
o 3010 0 to 60210 10,10"12"10
0.87 0,87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87
o 34 11 0 11 69
/-
\.
~
../
.
f:!d.\lrllij",~~;(,yPlJ.)j
Pedestrians
~~~'ro~ijj;~it); i.:':
Walking Speed litis)
~r$;~nft~~~a.ge--;ij j ,
Right turn flare (veh)
l\@1-l~i!-l)fWl.;:Cif3,. . '
Median storage veh)
U""'trepffi*$J ~?"l:'tt) j ,.
..~ ..., ,Jfll'!il. ,\
pX, platoon unblocked
vc;,~!,\fI,~!ilB.,yoJu'ge., 1908 1908 764 1172 1937 241 1529
vC 1, stage 1 conf vol
ve"'islel\e:.2:"cOlif vol
,.-.'\J7iic-.,,, ;d!:;t,'."",-."_"""",,,.-,)... ......
vCu, unblocked vol
tct;;~lhgle.(s) J ,"
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF(s) " 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 2.2
1'0 queue free % 35 100 90 90 100 98 84 99
CM capaCity (veh/h) 56 346 116 54 753 432 1309
~1l_~~!IlI!IlllllSl:t~,1\lW.~B:~.""i?;;~~::l;:i'~_I1Ilif;,;.~
\/olumeTotal 57 23 69 253 741 799
Volume Left 23 11 69 0 11 0
Volume Right 34 11 0 11 0 69
cSH 77 201 432 1700 1309 1700
Volymeto Capadty 0.74 0.11 0.16 0.15 0.01 0.47
Queue Length 95th (It) 89 10 14 0 1 0
Centlioi'Delay (s) 131.9 25.3 14.9 0.0 0.2 0.0
Lane LOS F DBA
Appmach Delay (s) 131.9 25.3 3.2 0.1
Approach LOS F D
23
60
0.87
69
None
None
1908 1908
7.5 6.5
764 1172 1937
6.9 7.5 6.5
247 1529
6,9 4.1
253
4.1
.
iCU Levelo! Service
B
Analysis Period
5/9/2005
Synchro 6 Report
Page 1
.
TDI
.
.
.
Hwy 96 and Site Driveway
2007 A.M. Peak Hour - Build
Arden Hills Office Park
Arden Hills, MN
- ~ .f -""\ ".
.'Jral!!!lll.'l\1i!14wlil!~iHl11lil~~ili-~lli~~Ji~_~~_-'I_
~~....~J4ilif"",300~~f7ilV'~~~~...~..dlt..~
LaneContigurations tt." . ,tt ."
Sign Control Free' 'EJeestOp
Grade 0% 0% 0%
\tolume (ven/h) 1110 60 0 !1B"OO' 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Hourly flow rate (vph) 1207 65 01'r13
Pedestrians
Lane Width (It)
Walking Speed (IUs)
PercentBtockage
Right turn flare (veh)
Median type
Median storage veh)
l)ps\reamsignal (It)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC,conflicting volume
vC1, stage 1 cont vol
vC2, stage 2 cont vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single (s)
tC. 2 stage (s)
tF (s) 22 3.5 3.3
pO queue free % 100 100 100
cM capacity (venlh) 542 49 442
i'<r..--__<5lI$,."..''''~,iijj,__'''Jiillilin.'~" '1!'''W.!l!I:i!i!li:rylfi_,','_,' ~DW".i\1""Wi!!!!l!!j!\0_____ilI'~rIrr"ll_
~"~l~~t~~mlliriMg_~ltfM~;-.~,,:~~_
Volume Total 603 603 65 707 707 0
Volume Lelt 0 0 0 0 0 0
Volume Right 0 06,5 0 0
cSH 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700
Volume to Capacity 0.35 0.35 0.04 OA2 OA2 0.00
Queue Length 95th (It) 0 0 0 0 0 0
COntrol Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Lane LOS A
Approa<;h Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0
Approach LOS A
None
1086
1272
0.79
1913
603
1272
4.1
1890
6.8
603
6.9
tntersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
leu Level ot Service
39.3%
15
A
519/2005
Synchro 6 Report
Page 1
TDI
.'<."",
(~)
Hamline Ave and Hwy 96
2007 P.M. Peak Hour - Build
Arden Hills Office Park
Arden Hills, MN
.
~
.;
- " .f -- '- "'\ t t'
_" '1~_fi%_"m____lfilimi_"'_;_".'_il1lmillrJill>____
J.Yl1aJ]f.;5?ft."Jkil,~fibm_~l~~gla~~1R_
Lane Configurations"! HH r"!"!tt r "! 4'r, ..<t. <. r
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 19!1Q' '19"()"0":19Qj)':190!l'190(l,1900 1900 1900 1 900 190Q:1'911Qi::i1g~"iJ
Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lane Uti!. Factor 1,Q(l' 0.9$: 1000 0.97 0.9$ 1000 0.95 0.95 l.d(l1',Qj)i:'1L.od
Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85
Fit Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 0,96 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3539 1583 3433 3539 1583 1681 1691 1583
Fit Permitted OISS 1.001.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.96 1:00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3539 1583 3433 3539 1583 1681 1691 1583
Volume (vph) ZO' .1170 110 210 112.0 10 280 10 760
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98
Adj. Flow (vph) 1143 10 286 10 776
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 98
Lane GrClup Flow (yph)ZO'1 1194 112 214 1143 4 144 152 678
Tum Type Prot Perm Prot Perm Split Perm Split
protected Phases '5 2 4 4
Permitted Phases 6 2
Actuated Green, G (s) 1.8. 36.4 36.4 810 42.6 42.6
Effective Green, g (s) 1.8 38.4 38.4 8.0 44.6 44.6
Actuated glC Ratio 0.0-20;32 032 0.07 0.37 0.37
Clearance Time (s) 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 3,0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 27 1132 507 229 1315 588
vis Ratio Prot 0.01 cO.M CO.06 032
vis Ratio Perm 0.07
vlc Ratio 0.74 1.05 0.22 0.93
Uniform Delay, d1 58.9 40.8 29.9 55.7
Progression Factor 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay. d2 70.7 42.4 1.0 41.4
Delay (s) 129.6 83.2 30.9 97.1
Level of Service F F C F
Approach Delay (s) 79.5
Approach LOS E
0.87
35.0
1.00
8.0
43.0
D
51.3
D
0.00
0.01
23.7
1.00
0.0
23.8
C
53.0
54.0
0.45
5.0
3.0
756
0.09
0.19
19.9
1.00
0.1
20.0
B
53.0
54.0
0.45
5.0
3.0
761
0.09
0.20
19.9
1.00
0.1
20.1
C
44.8
D
4
53.0
54.0
0.45
5.0
3.0
712
c0.43
0.95
31.7
1.00
22.5
54.2
D
'.
~
1803 1583
0.97 . ,,00
1803 1583
19',:.10
0.98 0.98
10
o
Perm
3.6
3.6
3.6
0.03
4.0
3.0
47
.
20
0.98
20
o 0
o. 30:
4.0
3.0
54
cO.02
0.56
57.4
1.00.
11.8
69.2
E
66.0
E
0.00
0.01
56.5
1.00
0.1
56.5
E
HCM to Capacity rallo
Actuated Cycle Length (s)
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
c Critical Lane Group
Sum of lost time (s)
ICU Level of Service
16.0
F
5/9/2005
.
TDI
Synchro 6 Report
Page 1
~
.
.
.
r'.')
\ .
......'
",,^
)
..'
Hamline Ave and Karth Lake Cr
2007 P.M. Peak Hour - Build
Arden Hills Office Park
Arden Hills, MN
..Jo_~ -('"-,-",,\ t ~\.~./
~1!!lIIIl.!I1;-~
Lane Configurations 4- 4- "i t> oft>
Sigricci...!fol; "..SlplD "top "ilfe'e- ';:;:/ L;:':"fire-e-~iffi:~'{{m
Grade 0% 0% 0% 0%
10 0
0.87 0.87
11 0
Factor
Hourly f1,,-w rate (vph) .
Pedestrians
46
.:.69
o
None
pX, platoon
vC, coriflictlngv6lume. 16.15 1615 184 1471 1615 1132
vCl, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stagll 2. conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
tC, single.(s)
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
pO queue free %
cM capacity (vehlh)
~_~~~I'i'~;;!~~.t;~i!IlIIl_Il@_~
Volume Total 115 23 46 1138 190 190
Volume Left 69 11 46 0 11 0
Volume Ri9ht 46 0 11 0 11
cSH 99 114 1187 1700 610 1700
Volume to Capacity 1.16 0.20 0.04 0.67 0.02 0.11
Queue Length 95th (ft) 191 18 3 0 1 0
Control Delay (s) 221.2 44.5 8.2 0.0 0.9
Lane LOS F E A A
Approach Delay (s) 221.2 44.5 0.3 0.4
Approach LOS F E
1615 1615
1615 1132
6.5 6.S
368
4,1
184 1471
6.9 7.5
3.5
o
62
3.3
S4
197
2.2
98
610
4.0
100
97
4.0
100
97
2.2
96
1187
3.3
94
827
3.5
86
80
Average Delay
Intersection C",pacity Utiliz"'tion
Analysis Period (mln)
15.9
66.6%
15
ICU Level of Service
C
5/912005
Synchro 6 Report
Page 1
TDI
. .'
Hwy 96 and Site Driveway
2007 P.M. Peak Hour - Build
Arden Hills Office Park
Arden Hills, MN
.
-.... .-....... ~
l!F,.ali_i'^'il1:1011;JJ21i_i:I1!)$;'."''''__1i;'I'l&l$i.''-'.'''_",tu,.-lilIIII1l____
~~jsfiL~~~1!l\[!iJJJJ~~.
Lane Configurations tt." tt ."
SIgn Gontrol Free Free Stop
Grade 0% 0% 0%
VOlume (veh/h) 1260 10 0 1410 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
l:!our]y;flow rate (vph) 1370 11 0 1533 0
Pedestrians
Laj1e-Width (It)
Walking Speed (ftIs)
Percent Blockage
Right turn flare (veh)
M~ian iipe
Median storage veh}
l.!\:lS,tream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC{conflicting volume
vCl, stage 1 conf vol
vC2; stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol
te, single (s)
te, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)
pO queue free %
cM capacity (veh/h)
40
0.92
43
None.
1086
1380
0.69
2136
685
1380
4.1
2196
6.8
685
6.9
2.2
100
492
3.5
100
26
3.3
89
391
.
__.Illfl~"'0"""""BI'Y.,*'_j=-I'I""'lBllil!l_l:fi",j'''0"",R~!tt_l!i@iill__~~-'''_'''_t!!lltI"'!Il
~haX~ftfrrj!$~m:\~m~0iJFtlllffi~lm&m~~,~m1L~~~~~L1flill%&~,~~
Volume Total 685 685 11 766 766 43' '
Volume Left 0 0 0 0 0 0
VQlurneRight 0 0 11 0 0 43
cSH 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 391
Volume to Capacity 0.40 0.40 0,01 0.45 0.45 0.11
Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 9
Controll)elay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.4
Lane LOS C
Approach I)elay(s) 0.0 0.0 15.4
Approach LOS C
Intersection Capacity Utilization
Analysis Period (min)
0.2
44.8%
15
ICU Level of Service
A
5/9/2005
Synchro 6 Report
Page 1
.
TDI
.
.
.
[.,\
i
\. I
()
Planning Commission Meeting
Attachment 4b - 4
Jnne 1, 2005
~
~
o
,
- c...--. \_ _ ~ _ -'- _ _
',-...., ""' 01 I~' NrJ/. ~I '^. 4Wl/.j ~I
~.<: ~., r~O. JO. Rn9. ;J
"
I'
~ t
~ ~I'
. ~ ;Q
j:? 0
$ Co ~
,. '"
~:II~
"- -<
~ ~ 0
o '"
~ l ~
HI'~
"" ~ -i
i::!i' 0
[~ :z
~ ~
"
,-
;~:~~,l,. -
"
1> gj ~ tt
~ ~... ~ ~
~ ~" 1.,
. 3 ~ ~.
~ [~, t ~
Lq.2 ~ 2
J 9" W ~ 1~
,P '1-
ij <l. 8 ~
'" <: 2 ~ 3 !Ul
t f;1~ ~ ~ ".
':l :34,
~ F~a
~ ~ ~ '" *
~ n ~~
~ <'"\ ~
~ ~ '€
0'),
~ >~
~H
"' ~;
5 ~.
P
,
.. I
,
"'v.
, .
f=
~ ,
r------
:l:..l
c
... '-" ~........ ....
O~~':!SS
"''-';;";0";0";-
gg~;~'~i-
Q~g:g~~I~
-<::.3~.... '" ''''
\il r co:; ~ ::tl
"'~"'A on F :S
'Z '" ~<:o c I< 0
~s,".z
;g ,..," f\ ,:=
POOp~g ~ ~
?~l>~\Q;t S
>< ~...,,,,. c:
g8~o~~ -.
c;o; 'I tD ~ '+ ;..
"2;:, "" (j
0~3~'-"~ M
~~....,>" ::: :::!
$~~r~_:l
~ H- 11;:5:-, ".
~ '"'''''~ s: c
~ ~~ ~; :r.
;"l' ;;:",,,
:;n P R!
" ::1::;2:
! ~';:J
~"
h
0"
:€.;
>>
g~
2-
. .
i ~.
, -
i .., -l
!"l
l!llt .,'
I h ~
i <>'0 <
, ,
~
--,
/
!,i
'I
a'}"
"a.f
. ,
f~"
"~l
H
~ alSo..
;;b~
p~
'-11
! ~
i;
n
-r-__
,- - -. -.-
, , -
I:': / ;1
I.t I I
n I i
I::; i ! '\
-. - <.~-L~:)j 4
~
,
~
".
,-
~
o
z
~'" '-.,
iF
<. ,
..> "
I.. I
,'.;: \
I;:; I
I"~ ,\
1.,-, I
Ii:; 1
I';'
..<
_ _ ....:__ _~_ T- -..
',:,.~~;I,."".
IIH':
,~, II ,,>
.L..._ -
~i I r..
i U o.
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
'" '" '"
;: ~ ~
~ ~ g
~ '
~ ~
S '1
Q c
~ l
,
c
~ ~
, ,
c c
'~ ~ I,r;
',: ~ ,:)
;: 6 'i:'~
~ ~ ~19
~ ~
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
!
c
g
I'U;
co ;~.~
"t)
~ "
> ~
: ~
~ e
91'S
~I~
~Ii
Qj
"
Co
~=:
""
>c
~~
^"
8~
0>
Q1;\
~
9
,
\
,
It.'i"',
\11 "".\
I I,
\~..l
,"
~i~H-,~ ~,
1-..-to,-!Q ~I
" '["''''.
:: ~ ;; ~ .
-I , :'il~-;:;'
HI\f,
.;Iii:i
71 I i;l~:~1
III ;'Ii'"
III"'"" ....",.",..
o I~I r.i"
~I-tl ~ i,;'!j:?" %~ ,'f:f~
_1~J~1 !~.I~~ li~~i ..:"S!
\~~~~.,. ...~ .~,(
- - ':~:,"~,
,,~,-,p'I'G
',' ~'\ '
"\\j.. "
. I,. ':.. \
'. '-\\ ',- '\
" ,'-. '.
I,
f'
, I
g>i!;;'j\'"
, \~(.Y
~irlt
1 :r-\!
'(;--'
! Ir
I'
I
I
" I
"'J,
"",1\.
-..
~ 3 ~ -
c' >
.. '" ~ ~
~~1!
i~n
~ ~ ~ ~-
iJ~:
~n~
Q.'''-
'{'pK
j ; ~ ~
~ 9. ~ ~
~ ~ ~ '
hn
~iyl .....'.......'.l,rg{..'.....
~ :' _ J\~ .-
, "C,," - l\ -0(', ~IO"' ,i. ;-
f >- ....~ .- '~I<'.;'.~tiri,.'ll.. ,":.
,~ '.- 'l'j' " '. . ('.'.:. fr:
h t I ,,~:~ jl
I, ~ /i
, +;. ~,
!. 'i,,~",,!cll..;:. ,.*
<1 l ,:,ir
'I'! J','"'~ ~ ':1
~ ,j .~,..':"~
~ I~ :~":',' ~~ it f r "i ~~;;IJ.n
10 ",',""'" ~,~ "
~ n~r;;:~" ".,.
~,~' ;I:~
~
'9'\;'"
-.g61i'
liil~
h4 .
l~~ g
~g:~ 5
1~~ "-
, li
! '
t-~'-"'~-'"
,
,
\
,
,
I:,'
O"'P"'~
II~"'I~';
I" Ii
\
,
I.,; \
~'
,
F. I
~~ '., ,
.. ,
,'-.1
,
-. _ --'
-
--
-
..j
;1'
<
..j
..<
. ",,",
... ~
,.
( ,~I
.....
.. -<
........ ~
1:;!
, ~
~~ ~"....~ .
1
f
....~
~.
Ii
~
~
~
N
o!
_>0'1
1
--~-~---
10;"<
____~_<;J_
j ,,-
(~)
;
~
$ S:!.l
lM-
~ ijS(~ 10
~ "~-P,op.".
t I ..,...,,,
~.!r
~ '
J ! ~! 1
IJ'."
~,~.,::'
v~
I- ".f-I:'") '-,", ,',:) I
!I',) !~ i!.N
f'll.~ 0 1"
.1 It"} I"}
.,
~~'l~~~lt "
: / -IH'lilH
...:"
.- ~,
L:
- 110
..
,.,
i"'
I
I>;;
. "tv.,:T
':' )
e;
-~)
!~
'""'
.' -.-::' I'
~15) " \5) lJ:
$"'; il$N ~ 81 ~,
.:.. 8.U1Ji. r~
} '0-- i~ .~
I 'Ii ,I'
~, '\1
,.
,~~
.,
',,'
to
':"\
t
I,,'i ,
:......1 ....;'
1'" .''''
<.'....Ii ::;Z!);:
i~.;': I
::';.
"..
,,'
I
.. '
. :
.. :
'. :
,
......
I
I. .
I" ...
.
.
;.;:.
1:\:;;"
~'f.: ......;
.. ....
..,
~;~~~I I IIS~~
." r;I~ E <TI,..., _ ,...,_i!;>;:;g
Si:;!~8::'-'lI.f>VlVl:t<~.!:;( _
('J c: ;:0-< -<--<-<::0 0....
PZ~~~@~~@~8N ~
Si";a ~ "1""" --:; -(~ '= ~ P'I
~~~~>ti~~iit i=i:51""'
i~g>oo--<--< ~. 0
Q;lom(l~~~IIIZ~~
g--:;",:"j"'~::;8'" ;~ ~
2~1. fllll''''''O _~~
;~~ ~2N~~ ::i ~
~:a ~ ~ "51", i!!~ r;s
i~~ 'c.o~~~1fl ~g ~
~I~ *~~'3g ~~:-.-
~~;: o~~~.., ~\12 ~
~ ):"(I)> <J\ r"1~ 0
~;;~ ""~a ~ti;;-
;:0 0 ,,[:? ;:0"
i~: ~ ~
II;;~ ~ ~ ~
e;:- "i1 p
> ><
0; a ~
It ~ 8
~~ Vl
III !~ ~t ,::;=;l
r' $... ~ '"' ~
?2 sv:. 'cOO
'W ;'-' ,13
~!.,' 'if'
.. ,"'" ,-" s:
.~ ~i - :z
~~'" - ", "
'" '" 6" ~ 0
~~ l~ ' !:1
~~!~ ~
'O~ ~ I,S' Ir-
~
~
,
,
~n~
'n!i~
Ul'
~ ~~i.!;
~:~; 8
i i):llli
-< -<,~ ~
ll"
<1 <::l~~ ~
I ~ ~J~
, ",..i">:,
;':1 ~:HJ;
I o <:';\i,. 8:
: ~ ~~:
I ~ ~~,. ~
I 1".... "Ig
I a':~i::
, ~,~~'
I ::l:::~ ~ I;
~~~g
H
~ ~
~ >.
~
-;ij'"
mI.
r()Ji
m m''''..
.. 1I.,.,:}:i,
'"' m -Fr.' .
(\' -( \J1 m .
~m~(l)() j:>..
'- E -11>......
. 7'i.[\J
tli:1 8(l)-{
wZ ell
u,\J1 Zm 11
\f1\J1 ~ l>
&w !:; r
{), 1I~ l>
~ -I
G
m
',!
, ,
-I\\-
(J)
-I
m
11
r
l>
Z
/"~''\
;, j
'"
s
()
11
S
l>
~
o
m
Z
Ir--I
i I'~_
U7 ~ r
'? r
I~ <P
I~ (\
'co ii
-n
()
m
11
l>
~
7\
A:...,~'W"Oi
.~_~ ;.8QO
"}.,,s'''''J(OI
.~,~ ~-"'-L-J
Irlo.-
'r~<?~%
~:.o"o.-)i(.'
''i~ Il'~'"
~;.:r.,;; (or
'l~ /i'''~o
~-
,
10.00
11.>.\
,
\~,I
.'~
n
":'1! t
.............. ~~!~
~ "~;':
~ ~~~. ....
.. i"f91d"-;;ct:",,.. <'
~ ~.
0~':,:':' {'
; . ':>
;."
~:~, ':.
'-'~,i,
<~ ",.
'..rL:::'"
.,:",,"":
:-:.~!;f.'l'
.
.
.
Planning Commission Meeting
June 1,2005
Attachment 4b - 5
.
.
.
H'.
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS (NBl DISTRICT.
L Procedure. The application and the adnulllstrative and reVIew procedure established in Section 8, Special Use
Pennits and in Appendix A, Procedural Manual, shi.lll be follo'.\-ed for all development thal mvo!ves new
building construction, modification of a budding's cxtcnor or I1lodlficatlon of the site. Special Use Permits are
no-t required for permitted uses tbat occup}.' approved buildings that do not require exterior budding
modification or site modification. This provision is subject to any modifications or additions set forth in this
Section. The prescnbcd procedure may be modified by the Clt}. to allo\1/ planning Oexibility and to encourage
cooperative dialogue between the applicant and the City.
2. Special Regulations/or Permitted Uses in tile NB District. Pelllllrted uses are allo\ved as specifIed in the Land
Use Chart, Section 5, E, for the NB District. However, this ordinance specifies additional requirements for
Clinics; financial Institutions & Service; and Retail Sales & Service_ These uses can, if unrestricted, place
unacceptable levels oftraffie on these sites and streets that would negatively impact adjacent residential uses
outside the neighborhood business district
3. Clinics shall not exceed 3,000 gross square feel.
b. Financia/lnstitutions & Service shall not exceed 5,000 gross. square feet, nor include a drive thru facility,
nor include an outdoor or detached automated kiosk.
c. Retail Sales & Service shall not exceed 3,000 gross square feel. These uses shall only include: antiques,
art and school supphes~ bakeries, bicycles (not motonzed), books, stationery, candy, camera and
photographic supplies, carpets and rugs, china and glassware, clothing and costume rental, convenience
store, custom dressmaking, drugs, dry goods, florlst, garden supplies (year-round operation only), gifts,
grocery, hardware, hats, hobby shops, household appliance repair, interior decorating (no retail furniture
sales), jewelry, locksmith shops, musical instruments, paint and wallpaper, shoes, sporting goods, tobacco,
toys, and wearing apparel, and similar type uses. Automobile rdated husiness, liquor stores., and
restaurants, exceeding 40 percent in gross liquor receipts of the total food and liqUOT receipts, would not be
allowed in the Neighborhood Business District
3. Special Regulations for Special Uses ill the NB District. SpeCial Uses 3rc allO\ved as specified in the Land Use
Chait, Section 5, E, for the NB District. However, thlS ordinance specifies additional requirements for
restaurants and multiple family and two-family d'.vellmgs units. These uses can, if unrestricted, place
unacceptable levels of traffic on these sItes and streets that would negatively impact adjacent residential us.es
olltside the neighborhood business district_
a. Restaurants shall not exceed 3,000 gross square feet Extcflor seating will be considered based 011 its
impact on adjacent residcntialLL')es outside the neighborhood business district.
b. Dwelling Umts shall be located within a mixed use development including non-residential structures.
4. District Requirements: (The district requirements J[) Section 5.F. for the NB Distnct will apply). To further
accomplish the stated purpose of the NB Districl, developers arc encomaged to plan their sites in the spirit of
the purpose and intent of the PlaIUled Unit Development provision in Section 5_ L. At the time of submittal for
the Special Use Permit and Site Plan Review, the applicant shall identify modifications to the standard zoning
requirements otherwise applicable to the site and the reasons \vhy the modifications would be in the public
interest and would be consistent \vith the purpose of the district.
The applicant shall demonstrate to tbe satisfaction of the City that the proposed uses, lot sizes, height, use mix,
location and relationship with other existing and proposcd uscs arc compatible and complementary both
intemally and with adjacent uses, and meet the intent of the City as expressed III the NB District purpose and
the above criteria for allowable Hses_
5. Building Exteriors, Site Features and Site Development. ^ccomplishing the stated purpose of the NB District
requires particular concern [or the design of buildings, site features (such as landscapillg, lighting, and signage)
and site design. The arrangement, geometry, massing, materials and colors shall be responsive to existing
buildings, site fealures and site design on adjoining Sites in the district.
The City Council '.vill make the fjnal determinatlOn on the compatibility and consisteHcy with this provision.
a. Landscaping for the site shall comply With Appendix A of the Zonmg Ordinance. In addition to Appendix
A landscaping shall be provided at tbe rate of three caliper inches per 40 feet of public street frontage.
5.9
h.
HllJJ;~r yards 30 feel in \vidth shall he provide adjacent to aU rcsiderui:al uses outside the neighborhood
business district. The buffer yard shall be landscaped with a combmation of evergreen trees (six-tool- high
mlllimum) and deciduous tTces (thrce-inch caliper minimum) such that the use is effectively screcned from
the adjacellt rcsidLllces. The buffer yard landscaping shall nor be included into the minimum landscapmg .
calculation (Section A, 5, 3)
lhJ!/rs of Operation shall be prohibited bet\vcen the hours of It :00 p.m. to 6:00 3.m. All deliveries and
loachng shall be done during normal hours of operation.
Sloped Roof') shall be utilized on all principal and accessory stmctures. Roofing materials and design shail
be consistent \vith those found in the adjacent residential nelghborhoods Olltside the neighborhood
business district.
Exterior A/arenals shall include only face brick, stone, glass, or natural wood products. All walls shaH be
treated \I,.ith the same exterior materials.
Lighting shall adhere to the requirements of See lion 6, E, 3, of the Zoning Ordinance. Lighling shall not
be pennitted to wash the building, except for accent lighting to delineatc the main enrryway into the
building_ Security and parking lot lighting shall be on pedestals not to exceed 14 feet in height.
Trash shall be fully screened in a masonry enclosure or shall be stored within the pnncipal structure.
Vending Machines shall be located on the interior of the principal structure.
Bicycle Racks shall be provided in an area that is convenient to the main entryway into the building.
Sidewalks shall be provided adjacent to all public rights-of-way.
Gateways, where applicable, should be incorporated into the layout of the site. The 1985 Parkway System
Feasibility Study and the Comprehensive Plan provide additional guidance on the incorporation of
gateways.
c.
d.
c.
f
g
h.
L
J
k.
L SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE B-3 SERVICE BUSINESS DISTRICT.
I. Procedure. The application and the adminIstrative and review procedure established in SectIon 8, Special Use
Permits and in Appendix A, Procedural Manual, shall be followed for all development that involves new
building construction, modification of a building's exterior or modification of the site. Special use permits are
not reqUlrcd for permItted uses that occupy approved buildings that do not require exterior building
modification or site modification. This provision is subject to any modifications or additions set forth in this
Section The prescrIbed procedure may be modified by the City to allO\\-' planning flexibility and to encourage
cooperative dialogue between the applicant and the City.
)
.
2. Permitted Uses. Permitted uses are allowed as specified in the Land Use Chart, Section 5, E, for the B-3
District.
3. Uses Allowed hy Special Use Permit.
a. The above permitted uses, if consttllction of a new building, modification of a building's exterior, or
modification of the site is involved.
b. Uses allo\',-'ed by Special Use Penuit as specified on the Land Use Chart, Sect tOll 5, E, for the B-3 District
4. Spedal Regulationsfor Drive-In Businesses and Fast Food Restaurants in the B-3 District. Section 6.D of
dus zoning ordinance, specifics additional requirements for drive-in businesses, fast food restaurants and
automobile service stations. This paragraph (4) is a provision whereby the proximity requirement of 1,320 feet
between drive-in bUSInesses or fast food restaurants may be \lv'aivcd irthe [ollowmg conditions are met:
h.
( \ c
j I
d.
a_ The operation consists of one or morc drive-In businesses or fas! food restaurants and is an integral part of
a building containing one or more other allowed uses, or the operation is part of an architecturally unified
"food court" or "drive-in service court" complex containing two or more restaurants, fast food restaurants
or drive-in businesses_
Shared access drives and shared parking are utilized by all such restaurants, fast ((lOJ restaurants or drive-
in husinesses in said building or complex.
Only one "food court" Of "drive-in business court" or buildmg containing fast food restaurants or drive-in
businesses will be allowed in addition to one freestanding fasl food restaurant.
.
The arclutecture and the site, grading, circulation, landscaping, screening ,lnd signage plans shall unify the
appearance ami function oUhe complex or building.
S-IO
.
.
.
Planning Comll1!ssion Meeting
June 1, 200S
Attachment 4b - 6
.
.
May 24, 2005
Plan Commission Members
City of Arden Hills
This relates to Planning Case 05-12, the Office Park proposed to be on the former city hall
and maintenance facility site, 1440-1450 Highway 96, and is further to our communication about
it dated April 23,2005, based now on the official proposal to come before you on June I rather
than on the preliminary one discussed at the neighborhood meeting April 19.
Arden Hills North Homes Association (AHNHA) represents the 140 townhomes situated
directly south of and adjacent to the proposed development. Our residents and Board of Directors
are not opposed to an office park on the site if it is consistent in both letter and spirit with the
applicable NB zoning. However, we continue to have serious reservations about the proposal,
notwithstanding minor modifications of, and the provision of additional details beyond those in,
the preliminary proposal.
Accordingly, we are listing those reservations at this time based on the revised proposal as
we now know it, and will augment them orally at the hearing on June 1. In addition, many of our
140 resident families may wish to comment independently in writing or verbally at the hearing,
along with others residing on Arden View Court (Townhouse Villages of Arden Hills
Association) and on Keithson Drive, as well as the management of Children's World.
Access.
I) Of the two accesses to the subject property, the one off Hamline Avenue is of the most
concern. Traffic entering or leaving from or to the north and entering from the south must cross
two lanes of traffic already congested at times. Congestion is due to increase anyway over the
next several years because of a major increase in employment at Guidant, with even more in
future years due to development of the TCAAP property. Exiting to the south even now
frequently requires breaking into a solid line of traffic, We already experience this a short distance
further south at Arden View Drive, but the difficulty would be exacerbated by proximity to the
Highway 96 intersection.
2) We have read the traffic study and note the tentative nature of its conclusions, including
its recommendation that 50-foot radius turns be provided on both sides of the entrance onto
Hamline which are not shown on the plat, and for which there may not be room, even if an
existing utility pole can be moved.
3) The easement from Hamline Avenue is on a hillside. Locating a driveway on it will
necessitate grading and retaining walls above and below it, not shown on the plat. How about
drainage, and protection of residents (including children) from falling? We see no detail in the plat
that answers to this.
4) The apparent main entrance to the property directly off Highway 96 is available only
eastbound, necessitating westbound traffic to U-turn at the Keitbson Drive intersection. The
traffic study was equivocal about tbis, stating "it is believed that the U-turn can be made safely,"
and that "County staffwill ban U-turns at the intersection if a problem arises."
Drainage.
5) With several acres now in grass or bush to be covered by impervious buildings and
parking or driveway surfaces, we request professional confirmation of exactly which elements of
the property constitute the claimed "40.3% open space," The amount of true green space seems
extremely limited except in two spots, but could be increased if the number of units were to be
decreased to, say, 24 rather than 30,
Proximity.
6) The whole project is immediately adjacent to a residential area, especially the two 5-
unit buildings along the south border (Lots 4-8 and 15-19). The setback there has been increased
.
.
.
.
.
.
t~ the 30 feet required by NB zoning (from a previously inadequate and noncompliant 20 feet)
and the ordinance requires specific landscape provisions in that buffer yard that are IlQ1 to be
included into the minimum landscaping calculation for the project as a whole. The 3-unit building
along the west border (Lots 1-3 )squeezes the asphalt trail between its rear wall and the rear lines
of the Keithson Drive lots, and will require the removal of most of the existing large trees, even
though a few have been identified to remain.
Lighting.
7) In the revised proposal, parking lot lighting pedestals have been reduced to the 14 feet
maximum allowed by NB zoning. However, the one of these closest to Lot 20 is also the closest
to residences at 1389 and 1390 Arden View Drive, is not needed for adequate illumination, and
should be eliminated along with tbe southernmost three parking stalls there. This would still leave
a total of 303 parking stalls, four more than the target number of299.
Appearance from Highway 96.
8) The 30-foot buffer yard behind Lots 1-8 and 15-19, even if planted according to NB
zoning requirements, will require some time to contribute to the present wooded background
appearance, which will thus result entirely from trees on AHNHA common land. The isometric
view of the PUD with the proposal documents represents an artist's future concept, with trees
that will not effectively be there for years, and shows no signage or parking lot lighting.
Sign age.
9) While the requested area of the entrance sign on Highway 96 has been reduced from
200 to 120 square feet, double the 60 sq. ft. allowed in the NB district. Similarly, the unit wall
signs shown on the front elevation are a lighted 30 sq. ft. with an "optional" additional overhead
sign on each unit that appears to be about 2' x 10' or at least 20 square fee, a total of 900-1,500
square feet of unit signage. In contrast with this, the wall signs in a very similar project in
Lakeville by Royal Oaks Realty appears to be about 6 square feet and look quite attractive (see
photos included). Cub Foods on Lexington was restricted to 100 square feet. If you can allow the
main sign to be double the NB maximum, you can also hold the individual signs to less than the
maximum, when they can't be seen from Highway 96 anyway. We take strong exc~ion to both
the lighted 30 sq. ft and the "o~tionaf' 20 sq. ft unit wall signs
Safety.
10) The pond in the NE comer behind the daycare center appears to be as much as II feet
deep, with 2 and 3-story building heights showing along its south side, as well as along the east
side of the e adjacent building, due to walkouts. The plan shows walkouts on both the 6- and the
5-unit buildings (Lots 20-25 and 26-30). How will the pond be fenced or otherwise protected
from children? Also the nature of any fencing or other barrier or demarcation along the south
border with Arden Hills North Homes Association or the east border with Children's World
should be indicated.
Occupancy.
II) We request assurance in ~tinlj: from the city or the developer or both I) that only
one office (with no retail) would be permitted per unit, whereas the walkouts might
accommodate two businesses via lease, even if each unit had one owner, and 2) that no
subsequent amendment to provide for any residential use would be requested or honored.
Arden Hills North Homes Association
Original signed by the following Board members:
Da\~d J. Ehresman, President Jmnes J. Pinckney, Board member
Sharon Redman, Vice President George Redman, Board member
Shannon Baker, Secretary Robert Anderson, Board member
Carl M. Westby, Jr., Treasurer Hank Snyder, Board member
Elwood F. Caldwell, Board member
e
.
.
May 24, 2005
Plan Commission Members
City of Arden Hills
This relates to Planning Case 05- J 2, the Office Park proposed to be on the former city hall
and maintenance facility site, 1440- I 450 Highway 96, and is further to our communication about
it dated April 23,2005, based now on the official proposal to come before you on June I rather
than on the preliminary one discussed at the neighborhood meeting April J 9.
Arden Hills North Homes Association (AHNHA) represents the 140 townhomes situated
directly south of and adjacent to the proposed development. Our residents and Board of Directors
are not opposed to an office park on the site if it is consistent in both letter and spirit with the
applicable NB zoning. However, we contitule to have serious reservations about the proposal,
notwithstanding minor modifications of, and the provision of additional details beyond those in,
the preliminary proposal.
Accordingly, we are listing those reservations at this time based on the revised proposal as
we now know it, and will augment them orally at the hearing on June I. In addition, many of our
140 resident families may wish to conunent independently in writing or vernally at the hearing,
along with others residing on Arden View Court (Townhouse Villages of Arden Hills
Association) and on Keithson Drive, as well as the management of Children's World.
Access.
1) Of the two accesses to the subject property, the one offHamline Avenue is of the most
concern. Traffic entering or leaving from or to tbe north and entering from the south must cross
two lanes of traffic already congested at times. Congestion is due to increase anyway over the
next several years because of a major increase in employment at Guidant, with even more in
future years due to development of the TCAAP property. Exiting to the south even now
frequently requires breaking into a solid line of traffic. We already experience this a short distance
further south at Arden View Drive, but the difficulty would be exacerbated by proximity to the
Highway % intersection.
2) We have read the traffic study and note the tentative nature of its conclusions, including
its reconunendation that 50-foot radius turns be provided on both sides of the entrance onto
Hamline which are not shown on the plat, and for which there may not be room, even if an
existing utility pole can be moved.
3) The easement from Hamline Avenue is on a hillside. Locating a driveway on it will
necessitate grading and retaining walls above and below it, not shown on the plat. How about
drainage, and protection of residents (including children) from falling? We see no detail in the plat
that answers to this.
4) The apparent main entrance to the property directly off Highway 96 is available only
eastbound, necessitating westbound traffic to U-turn at the Keithson Drive intersection. The
traffic study was equivocal about this, stating "it is believed that the U-turn can be made safely,"
and that "County staff will ban U-turns at the intersection if a problem arises."
Drainage.
5) With several acres now in grass or bush to be covered by impervious buildings and
parking or driveway surfaces, we request professional confirmation of exactly which elements of
the property constitute the claimed "40.3% open space" The amount of true green space seems
extremely limited except in two spots, but could be increased if the number of units were to be
decreased to, say, 24 rather than 30.
Proximity,
6) The whole project is immediately adjacent to a residential area, especially the two 5-
unit buildings along the south border (Lots 4-8 and J 5-19). The setback there has been increased
to the 30 feet required by NB zoning (from a previously inadequate and noncompliant 20 feet)
and the ordinance requires specific landscape provisions in that buffer yard that are !!Q1 to be
included into the minimum landscaping calculation for the project as a whole. The 3-unit building .
along the west border (Lots 1-3)squeezes the asphalt trail between its rear wall and the rear lines
of the Keithson Drive lots, and will require the removal of most of the existing large trees, even
though a few have been identified to remain.
Lighting.
7) In the revised proposal, parking lot lighting pedestals have been reduced to the 14 feet
maximum allowed by NB zoning. However, the one of these closest to Lot 20 is also the closest
to residences at 1389 and 1390 Arden View Drive, is not needed for adequate ilIwnination, and
should be eliminated along with the southernmost three parking stalls there. This would still leave
a total of 303 parking stalls, four more than the target number of 299.
Appearance from Highway 96.
8) The 3D-foot buffer yard behind Lots 1-8 and 15-19, even if planted according to NB
zoning requirements, will require some time to contribute to the present wooded background
appearance, which will tlms result entirely from trees on AHNHA common land. The isometric
view of the PUD with the proposal documents represents an artist's future concept, with trees
that will not efrectively be there for years, and shows no signage or parking lot lighting.
Signage.
9) While the requested area of the entrance sign on Highway 96 has been reduced from
200 to 120 square feet, double the 60 sq. ft. allowed in the NB district. Similarly, the unit wall
signs shown on the front elevation are a lighted 30 sq. ft. with an "optional" additional overhead
sign on each unit that appears to be about 2' x 10' or at least 20 square fee, a total of 900-1,500
square feet of unit signage. In contrast with this, the wall signs in a very similar project in
Lakeville by Royal Oaks Realty appears to be about 6 square feet and look quite attractive (see
photos included). Cub Foods on Lexington was restricted to 100 square feet. If you can allow the
main sign to be double the NB maxinmm, you can also hold the individual signs to less than the
maximum, when they can't be seen from Highway 96 anyway. We take strong exc~ion to both
the lighted 30 sq. ft. and the "optionaY' 20 sq. ft .unit wall signs
.
Safety.
10) The pond in the NE comer behind the daycare center appears to be as much as II feet
deep, with 2 and 3-story building heights showing along its south side, as well as along the east
side of the e adjacent building, due to walkouts. The plan shows walkouts on both the 6- and the
5-unit buildings (Lots 20-25 and 26-30). How will the pond be fenced or otherwise protected
from children? Also the nature of any fencing or other barrier or demarcation along the south
border with Arden Hills North Homes Association or the east border with Children's World
should be indicated.
Occupancy.
II ) We request assurance in writing from the city or the developer or both I) that only
one office (with no retail) would be pennitted per unit, whereas the walkouts might
accommodate two businesses via lease, even if each unit had one owner, and 2) that no
subsequent amendment to provide for any residential use would be requested or honored.
Arden Hills North Homes Association
OrigilUJl signed by the following Board members:
David J Ehresman, President James J. Pinckney, Board member
Sharon Redman, Vice President George Redman, Board member
Sharmon Baker, Secretary Robert Anderson, Board member
Carl M. Westby, Jr., Treasurer Hank Snyder, Board member
Elwood F. Caldwell, Board member
.
e
.
.
.
.
Durand & Associates
Property i\!\al1dgemenl, II1L
May 18,2005
City of Arden Hills
Peter Hellegers, City Planner
1245 Hwy 96
Arden Hills, MN 55112
Dear Mr. Hellegers:
I am writing to you on behalf of the Board of Directors of the Arden Hills North Homes
Association, a 140 unit townhome community in Arden Hills. The Board has asked me to
inquire on Planning Case # 05-12, a PUD to allow 76,000 square feet of office space in
the old City Hall and Public Works garage site.
The South border of this site is the North border of the Association's property. The
Board respectfully requests a copy of the survey you have completed along our common
boundary. We are also requesting a copy ofthc PUD application. We want to be sure our
boundary is respected and that we are allowed to share any concerns we have about the
development.
Please contact me at 651-379-3173 or via e-mail at iursino(aldurandandassoeiates.com so
On behalf of the Arden Hills North Board of Directors.
Sincerely,
?JsiA--
John A. Ursino
Property Manager
Durand & Associates Propcny Management lnc.
ce; Board of Directors
:,;;(~~.h:~-i_'
,'~.,
'.....~~;
,c~,~~."..,.;?'_
""'],j:' ~;,:' -~ I<:ul. ,\\\, C'-:,()iJ<-'O_)'l
. ~,1\_ L l-;'iO---iI1;]
'eI ('<,_'Yl'
Page 10f2
Hellegers, Peter
From;
Sent;
To;
Cc;
WIEMANN9@aol.com
Sunday, May 01. 200512:13 PM
peter. hellegers@ci.arden-hills.mn.us
Donna. wie man n@ci.minneapolis.mn.us
.
Subject: PC#05-12
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status; Completed
Dear Peter,
I reside at 1406 Arden View Drive which is directly south of the vacant Arden Hills public works building. My
husband and I are 30 year residents of Arden Hills.__.a great community.
I have read Ihe rr,aterials about the proposed PUD for 30 office condos and my husband attended the first
meeting about this topic. I offer the following comments and request your response:
1. Currently there is considerable amount of vacant office and business space in the metro area. I realize that
the proposed condo office will be ownership, however
a) has there been a market study and, fi so. what does the market study say?
b) will the City require Royal Oaks Realty to have presold a certain percentage of the space prior to sale of the
property or will the development be completely speculative?
c) what will be the size of each condo space?
d) what will be the sale price per square foot of the condo space
e) has the Ctiy received in the recent past inquires from business owners looking for space in Arden Hills____getting
back to the question of how likely will the spaces be sold?
.
2. I strongly encourage that the City hold the developer to its maximum height for parking light poles. I am
assuming that the lighting will be on at night and would like to know how the lights will impact the residential area
to the south to the extent it can be determined at this time.
3. Who will be the property management company for the office condos?
4. Is there a possibility that the # of condo units could be reduced? If a reduced # of condos were developed,
e.g 24 condo units, what are the repercussions e.g would the project still be a go, would the numbers work, and
so forth.
5. Was the property in quesiton RFP'd? What is the background leading up to the City considering a propoeral
from Royal Oaks Realty?
6. Right now there are some dead and dying trees on the CtlY property north of the property line between my
home and the former public works maintenace garage. I know they will be removed and want to encourage City
staff to really push for plenty of trees to be planted along the south side of the the developn.,ent to insure the best
buffer possible.
7. I suggest that the City require the developer to put money in the development budget for insuring satisfaction
of the projject development. For example, if there turns out to be a huge problem with the trees or landscaping
serving as a buffer, that the developer has money available to work out the problems. Or if there is a problwem
wityh drainage and the developer needs to remedy I am certain there are other examples. but this is the only
one I can think of at this time.
Thank you.
.
Sincerely,
5/27/2005
Page 2 of2
Donna Wiemann
. 1406 Arden View Drive
Arden Hills, MN 55112
612-673-5257
651-636-5499
wiemann9@aol.com
donna. wieman n@ci.minneapolis.rnn.us
.
.
5/27/2005
. April 23, 2005
Plan Commission Membcrs
City of Arden Hills
This relates to Planning Case 05-12, the Office Park proposed to be on the former
city hall and maintenance facility site, 1440-1450 Highway 96.
Arden Hills North Homes Association (AHNJlA) represents the 140-unit
townhomes situated directly south of and adjacent to the proposed development. Our
residents and Board of Dircctors are not opposed to an office park on the sitc ifit is
consistent in both letter and spirit with the applicable NB zoning. However, we have
serious reservations about the initial proposal as discussed at the neighborhood
informational meeting on April 19, and understand that it will be substantially modified
prior to prescntation at a hearing on June I.
.
Accordingly, we arc listing those reservations at this time based on the initial
proposal as we now know it. Wc understand that a modified proposal would be available
for our inspection in mid May prior to your meeting on June I, and are planning to
present further comments to you then. In addition, many of our 140 resident families may
wish to comment indcpcndently in writing or verbally at the meeting, along with others
residing on Arden View Court (Townhouse Villages of Arden Jlills Association) and on
Keithson Drive, as well as the management of Children's World.
Among other steps taken to assess the probable impact of the proposed office
p::rk, we have toured and photographed a similar development by Royal Oak Realty in
Lakeville having similar building likely using the same or very similar plans.
1} Of.thet\'<0 the_pr9pe~Y{),n:.Hj_gh\~r:lY ,Of.,
Avenue is of the most conccm. Traffic entering or leaving from or to the north must cross
two lanes of traffic already congested at times; the same applies to entering from the
south, while exiting to the soutb much of the time requires breaking into a line of traffic.
We already experience this a short distance further south at Arden View Drive, but the
proposed new entrance/exit will be worse due to its proximity to the Hamline-96
interscction. The County traffic engineer must be consulted and permits issued for such
an entrance or exit.
2) The casement from Hamline A venuc is on a hillside. If a driveway is located in
it, how would the area above and below it be graded or retained to prevent erosion?
Where will tbe drainage go? And will thc edges of the retaining wall or grade be
protectcd by railings or a fcnce to protect residents (including children from the adjacent
daycare facility) from falling?
.
3) The apparent "main" entrance to thc propcrty directly off Highway 96 is
a':ailablc only eastbound, neccssitating westbound traffic to V-turn at the Kcithson Drive
}
intersection, which Keithson Drive residents find objectionable, apart fi-om any
interfcrence with other eastbound traffic that may result. Again, a County permit will be
required.
.
4) With several acres now in grass or bush to be covered by impervious buildings
and parking or driveway surfaces, where will the increased runoff go? The extremely
limited amount of green space except in two spots could be increased if the number of
units were to be decrcased to, say, 24 rather than 30.
5) The whole project is immediately adjacent to a residential area, especially the
two 5-unit buildings along the south border. The setback there appears to be 20 feet,
whereas NB zoning requires "Buffer yards 30 feet in width [to] be provided adjacent to
all residential uses outside the neighborhood busincss district," with specific landscape
provisions that are not to be included into the minimum landscaping caIcu lation for the
project as a whole. Moreover, thc 3-unit building along the west border squer;zes the
asphalt trail between its rear wall and the rcar lines ofthc Keith son Drive lots, and would
require the removal of the few large trees that remain on the property from its former use.
6) Where parking lot lighting on the Lakevillc proj cct is on poles that appear to be
25 feet high, Arden Hills NB zoning requires pedestals not to excced 14 feet high. This is
especially important adjacent to residences on the west and south sides.
7) Where the rcquired 30-foot sctback might allow the retention of some existing
large trecs along the south border, the initial proposal would apparently require the
rcmoval of all natural vegetation, evcn if partially replaced later by nursery stock. Loss of
all trees along the south border would leave a wooded background appearance from
Highway 96, but it would result entirely from trees on AHNHA common land.
.
8t()UL.e-::"tim._att}oftD_f'. an~-a of the entr:l!1CC
height ab;;~~g;~~ll;r~f 15ft., \Vhereas the sign ordinance allows only 60 sq. ft. in the NB
district. Similarly, thc unit signs shown on the front elevation are 20 sq. ft. versus 6 sq. ft.
allowed on individual units in the NB zone. Signs of about this size on units in the
LakeviUe project look OK.
9) The pond in the NE comer behind the daycare centcr appears to be at least
several feet deep, with 2 and 3-story huilding heights showing along its south side, as
well as along the west side of the adjacent building, due to walkouts. Thc initial plan
shows walkouts on both the 6- and the 5-unit buildings there, although it was claimed at
the neighborhood meeting that there would be less. How will thc pond be fenced or
otherwise protected?
10) We request assurance in writing that 1) only one office would be pemlitted
per unit (whereas the walkouts might pennit two via lcase, cvcn if each unit had one
owner), and 2) that no subsequent amcndment to provide for any residential use would be
requested or honored.
.
.
.
.
II) The nature of any fencing or other barrier or demarcation along the south
border with AHNHA or the east border with Childrcn's World should be indicated.
Arden Ilills NOIih Homes Association
Original signed by the following Board members:
David J. Ehresman, President
Sharon Redman, V ice President
Shannon Baker, Secretary
Carl M. Westby, Jr., Treasurer
Elwood F. Caldwell, Board member
Jamcs K. Pinckney, Board member
George Redman, Board member
Robert Andcrson, Board member
. April 19. 2005
To Whom It May Concern:
We are unable to attend the meeting tonight, but we do have definite problems with what
we understand will be the entrance and exit plans for your development A road running
south of the day care facility will go right past a number of Arden Hills North units. We feel
strongly that all entrances and exits to your office complex should be from highway 96 and
that both left and right hand turns to and from the omplex onto 96 should be provided for.
The costs of road access from highway 96 should be borne by the developer.
We feel strongly that your development should have nearly no impact upon the housing
units nearest to it If a road south of the day care center going out to Hamline Ave. is
deemed necessary for safety, it should be for emergency vehicle use only--but we hope
such a road would not be needed.
We would appreciate it if you would read this letter at your meeting.
Sincerely,
(~
\
t'"/ iA1, '- V
./
(llluf_~/
T~_____.. -
,
~-<-~.--.J2.-1________ .
k --
.
Dan and Kathryn Kuehn
1362 Arden View Dr.
Arden Hills, MN 55112
.
~iellegers. Peter
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Judith Strom [jstrom@superiorassociates.comj
Tuesday, April 19, 20056:11 PM
peter. hellegers@ci.arden-hills.mn.us
Royal Oaks Realty Developmenl
I would like to express my opposition to the development planned on the
site of the former city hall,
This is too large of a development for the site; it would add much
traffic to an area that has more than enough. One cannot exit onto
Hamline in the morning or during the evening rush hour.
Also, this would destroy a wooded area that adds to the neighborhood.
I believe Lhat this development, as currently plannedl would definitely
hurt our property values and neighborhood and I urge the City ti reject
it as it stands.
Thanks
Judith Strom
4476 Arden View Court
Arden Hills
1
.
.
.
.
.
.
Page I of I
Hellegers, Peter
"'~--~'~~----~"_._------~-'-'.-
From; JAMES HARTSOE [JRHARTSOE@MSN.COM]
Sent; Tuesday. April 19, 200510:50 AM
To; peter.hellegers@ci.arden-hills.mn.us
Dear Peter,
I have received information on the neighborhood meeting scheduled for this e\lening on Project
PC#05-12, PUD & Plat.
I am the president of the Townhouse Villages of Arden Hills Homes Association located on Arden
View Court. Our board meets this evening and I canot attend the meeting. But I do want to
raise some questions on the proposed plans. In looking at the preliminary plat and site plan of
Arden Hills Office Park, it shows seven buildings and a lot of paved parking area. Will this not
cause a lot of run-off water? It appears there is too much paved area.
I also believe that 30 offices is too many for this small an area. You are going to cause problems
for the Day Care center, with the additional traffic going in and out of the office park.
There is already heavy traffic on Hamline Avenue. The people who seek to access Hamline
Avenue from Arden View Drive have difficulty doing so between 7:30 and 8:30 a.m. and also
again between 4:00 and 5:30 p.m. This will also be true of those who use the office park.
Will this office park be used only during day time hours or will it have some offices used at night?
Will it be a lighted parking area all night long?
I believe the current proposal is going to create many more problems for the residents of this
area, and for the city of Arden Hills. If you wish to proceed, then I believe it should be scaled
back so that there are not more than 20 offices in this small area, and more natural space
( unpaved or wooded area) provided.
James R. Hartsoe
4430 Arden View Court
Arden Hills, MN 55112
651 639-9963
4119/2005
l
,.
Pagelofl
Hellegers, Peter
From: Warren Pakulski [pakulski1809@comcast.net]
Sent: Wednesday, April 13. 2005 8:11 AM
To: peter.hellegers@ci.arden-hills.mn.us
Subject: PC#05-12, PUD and Plat Royal Oaks Realty
.
Peter, sorry I have a conflict on April 19th, but will try to attend the May 5th Planning
Commission Meeting on the above subject.
My recommendation is a concern in seeing the parking lot and cars from 96 when this project
is completed. Just drive south on 35E, between Highway 36 and Larpenter. On both sides of
35E are business parks which have the buildings in the back of the lot and the parking in front.
Very big eye sore to see all that black-top, oil drip spots, and cars parked.
I thought the modern trend was to put the buildings by the street and enclose the parking or
put the cars in back? Look at the business village in Maple Grove, or the Senior Housing in
Shoreview, on the east side of Lexington north of Lake Josephine, or the Senior Housing on
the corner of southeast corner of Snelling and Larpenter. Both projects have the buildings on
the street and the parking out of view.
What I propose for the above project, is to move or reposition the building shown with units # .
4,5,6,7 & 8; and, building shown with units# 15.16,17,18,19; from the back (south side) of
the lot to the edge next to 96 (on the north side).
This way we would only see the buildings and not the parking lots and cars ( in some years the
big piles of snow that are plowed from the lots) from 96, and, the buildings would not be seen
by the town houses to the south of the project.
that evening) but will be at the Planning Meeting on May 5th.
Please contact me if I have been unclear. Please pass my comments to the Mayor and Council
Members.
Thank YOU.
Warren Pakulski
4545 Pleasant Drive
651.638.9338 (office)
651.6334833 (home.
.
4/ 13/2005
.
.
.
~
~HILLS
MEMORANDUM - ADDENDUM
DATE:
PC Agenda Item 4.B
June I, 2005
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Peter Hellegers, City Planner
SUBJECT: PC #05-12; Royal Oaks Realty, Inc.
Master and Final Plan POO and Preliminary Plat for the Old City Hall 1
PW site 1440-1450 W. Highway 96 "Arden Hills Office Park"
UPDATE
Staff has met with the developer and after discussing the items in the staff report and
other issues the following items have been modified to strengthen the design elements of
the project:
A. The current City trail meanders along the western end of the property proposed
for development. The developer has stated that they want to work with the City to
locate the trail so as to save as many of the existing trees in this area as possible.
Staff anticipates that the City Planner, Operations and Maintenance Director, and
City Forester would meet with the developer to identify the best location for the
trail that preserves as many trees as possible.
B. After reviewing the staffs comments in the report to the Planning Commission,
the developer has determined that changing the exterior building materials would
better meet the City's criteria. The developer has proposed using a brick base
v.'ith hardy board design (similar to the Lakeville design - see attached) instead of
the currently proposed brick and stucco. The color scheme would still be earth
tone colors, most likely similar to the Eden Prairie project. This design scheme is
also very residential looking and an overall well designed product.
C. Thc developer has indicated some interest in using small fabric canopies (without
signage or numbers) over the entrances to the units. This again is similar to the
Eden Prairie development. Staffis comfortable with this proposal.
D. The developer has proposed using a higher quality design versa-lock retaining
walls as opposed to the currently proposed bolder retaining walls. Staff is again
comfortable with this proposal.
E. Finally, the developer has indicated that the building containing units 26-30 may
bc occupied by just one business. Currently the Sign Ordinance permits up to 30
square feet of signage, and since this is of the nature of the multi-tenant .
developments each unit may install signs for "...each individual business
establishment that has exclusive use of some portion of the street or otherwise
primary level of the building and direct access to the outside." It is understood
that the total signage for the building with 5 separate businesses could total 150
square feet. However, what the developer would like to do is to have a somewhat
larger sign facing Highway 96. Staff has discussed this proposal with the
developer and has arrived at the following language as a condition of approval:
The building containing units 26-30 may be occupied by only one
business; for this building the maximum wall signage may be 60 square
feet, in addition the southerly facing wall shall have no more than 30
square feet. The total square feet of signage for this building would not
exceed 90 square feet.
Recommendation
All of these items could be included as conditions of approval. Staff would suggest the
following language for conditions; these conditions would be added to end of staff's
proposal for conditions 1-17 as listed on pages 16 through 17 of the staff report to the
Plmming Commission date June 1,2005:
18. The developer shall work with the City when locating and platting the City
trail so as to save as many of the existing trees in this area as possible. .
19. The development shall be of a Hardy-board lap style exterior with a brick
base consistent with revised elevations which shall be submitted to the City
for review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permit.
20. The proposed canopies, similar to the style in the pictures presented to the
Planning Commission at their June 1,2005 meeting shall be included on the
revised elevations which shall be submitted to the City for review and
approval prior to the issuance of a Building Permit.
21. Revised plans shall denote the change from a boulder style retaining wall to
a versa-lock retaining wall.
22. The building containing units 26-30 may be occupied by only one business;
for this building the maximum wall signage may be 60 square feet, in
addition the southerly facing wall shall have no more than 30 square feet.
The total square feet of signage for this building would not exceed 90 square
feet.
.
.
.
.
Planning Commission Meeting
July 6, 2005
Attachment 4a - 3
.
.
.
ARDEN HILLS PLANNlNG COMMISSION - JUNE 1,2005
4
corner of Highway 96 and Round Lake Boulevard subject to the conditions as outlined in
staff s June 1, 2005 report.
The motion carried unanimously (6-0).
Commissioner McClung moved, seconded by Commissioner Modesette to find the
Planning Commission considered the effect of the proposed use of the health, safety,
convenience and general welfare of the owners and occupants of surrounding land, in
particular, and the community as a whole, in general, including but not limited to the
following factors: existing and anticipated traffic and parking conditions; noise, glare,
odors, vibration, smoke, dust, air pollution, heat, liquid or solid waste, and other nuisance
characteristics; drainage; population density; visual and land use compatibility with uses
and structures on surrounding land; adjoining land values; park dedications where
applicable, and the orderly development of the neighborhood and the City within the
general purpose and intent of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Development Plan
for the City.
The motion carried unanimously (6-0).
B.
PLANNING CASE 05-12: ROYAL OAKS REALTY, 1000 COUNTY ROAD E
WEST, SHOREVIEW, MN; MASTER AND FINAL PUD AND PRELIMINARY
PLAT FOR OLD CITY HALL AND PUBLIC WORKS SITE (1440-1450
HIGHWAY 96).
Mr. Hellegers stated applicant was requesting a Master and Final POD and Preliminary
Plat for the redevelopment of the old City HalllPublic Works property as a 7 building, 30
unit, office condominium complex. Staff recommended approval of the Master and Final
Planned Unit and Preliminary Plat subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicant shall submit revised plans, responsive to the comments from the Plan
Review Comments section of this report (14A), for review and approval by the City
Planner, City Engineer, and City Building Official, prior to issuance of building
permits.
2. The applicant and their contractors shall work with the City Planner and City Forester
to save as many existing (and healthy) trees as possible in the areas designated as
landscape space.
3. The applicant's timeline for development shall be as follows:
-Phase 1: Summer 2005 - The developer may begin grading, installing utilities,
and construction of storm water improvements. It is expected that construction on
3 buildings/16 units are expected to be ready for occupancy by the spring of 2006.
-Phase 2: Summer 2006 - The developer expects to begin construction on the
remaining 4 buildings/14 units (presumably 1-14) with expected occupancy of
these units by the Spring of2007.
Extensions beyond 2007 shall require application to the City Council for review and
approval. At the time of application for extensions, the City Council may include such
conditions of approval as they determine necessary for compliance with City Code.
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - JUNE 1,2005
5.
4. 30 office condominium uses have been proposed for development on individual lots.
Only one business shall be permitted to occupy anyone lot within the development.
It is acceptable for one business to occupy more than one lot; however one business
shall not occupy more than six (6) units within the development.
.
5. In the event that retail uses replace the office uses proposed for development, such
retail uses as permitted through the Neighborhood Business District shall not occupy
more than 30% of the units in the proposed development. The hours of such
businesses shall comply with Neighborhood Business District regulations for hours of
operation.
6. Restaurants which are listed as special uses for the Neighborhood Business District
shall require a Special Use Permit and shall be required to follow the standard public
hearing and Special Use Permit process prior to occupying any space within the
development.
7. Residential use shall not be allowed to occupy any of the units in the proposed
development.
8. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan for review and approval by the
City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. The revised landscape plan
shall include a mixture of coniferous and deciduous trees along the west buffer yard
of the development. The mixture of landscaping shall adequately screen the
development from the residential properties to the west.
.
9. A comprehensive sign plan shall be established to address signage within the
development and shall be included with the Planned Unit Development document.
The comprehensive sign plan will establish sign standards for all signage within the
development.
10. Revised plans showing sidewalk connections, throughout the development and to the
City and County trail systems, shall be submitted to the City Planner and City
Engineer for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits.
11. All mechanical operating equipment shall be screened to meet City regulations.
12. A revised lighting plan shall be submitted to the City Plmmer for review and approval
prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall include any accent lighting
on the buildings and also shall meet the City requirements for levels of illumination
on adjoining residential property. The applicant shall also furnish the City Planner
with lighting cut sheets for lighting fixtures proposed in the development.
13. Decorative painted fencing (like painted wrought iron fencing) shall be erected
around the pond at the northeast comer of the property to protect pedestrians from .
falling into the pond.
14. Execution of a PUD Permit drafted by the City Attorney and approved by the City
Council prior to the issuance of a Building Permit.
.
.
.
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - JUNE 1,2005
6
15. Satisfaction of the park dedication requirements as approved by the City Council.
16. The applicant shall submit an application for a Final plat within six (6) months
following City Council approval of the POD and Preliminary Plat.
17. The applicant shall obtain all necessary permits from the Rice Creek Water Shed
District and Rmnsey County.
18. The developer shall work with the City when locating and replatting the City trail so
as to save as many of the existing trees in this area as possible.
19. The development shall be of a Hardy-board lap style exterior with a brick base
consistent with revised elevations which shall be submitted to the City for review and
approval prior to the issuance of Building Permit.
20. The proposed canopies, similar to the style in the pictures presented to the Planning
Commission at their June 1,2005 meeting shall be included on the revised elevations
which shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of a
Building Permit.
21. Revised plans shall denote the change from a boulder style retaining wall to a versa-
lock retaining wall.
22. The building containing units 26-30 may be occupied by only one business; for this
building the maximum wall signage may be 60 square feet, in addition the southerly
facing wall shall have no more than 30 square feet. The total square feet of signage
for this building would not exceed 90 square feet.
Vice Chair Zimmerman inquired about the lot size. He asked when they had multiple lots
in a development, what were the underlying zoning requirements. Mr. Hellegers replied
this parcel was a large piece of property and as a part of the POD it did allow them to
have flexibility to look at different configurations.
Vice Chair Zimmerman stated since these were office condominiums sold as individual
parcels, then they had to go back to the 13,000 square foot lot size, unless they chose to
vary from that zoning requirement. Mr. Hellegers replied he did not believe the intent
was to have individual units of 13,000 square foot lot size.
Vice Chair Zimmerman expressed concern about density on a smaller piece of property
than they would normally have. Mr. Hellegers directed him to page 5 of staffs report
where it indicated the density ratio was considerable lower than the maximum.
Commissioner Larson asked if it was customary that they look at the main building
material covering as being what is controlled by the ordinance, or is it all materials, or did
they make exception for a minor use of that material. Mr. Hellegers replied at the time
they were trying to do something similar to an Eden Prairie development in which it was
brick all of the way up to the top of the windows with stucco above that. He noted it did
not break down primary or secondary materials, but he wanted the Commissioners to
know what they were looking at. He noted the design materials now being proposed
were brick below the windows with hardy board above.
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - JUNE 1, 2005
7.
Vice Chair Zimmerman stated hardy board in his opinion was less desirable building
material than stucco.
.
Commissioner Larson noted hardy board was a cement board with a baked on finish and
it was not a wood material, so it would not need to be painted.
Commissioner Bezdicek inquired about the driveway off of Highway 96. Mr. Hellegers
replied the applicant would put in a right turn lane in the shoulder and they would need to
repaint that area to indicate the turning lane.
Commissioner Bezdicek asked what was the expected use of the service road. Mr.
Hellegers referred him to the traffic study and noted the primary access would be for
those going westbound on Highway 96 as well as those going north on Hmnline Avenue.
Commissioner Larson stated in order to proceed east on Highway 96, they would need to
use the Highway 96 entrance and the only problem would be going west on Highway 96.
Mr. Hellegers replied more often than not in order to go west on Highway 96, they would
need to make a "U" turn at the protected light at Hmnline Avenue.
Commissioner Larson asked if the 50-foot turn radius was standard. Mr. Hellegers
responded applicant wanted a 50-foot turn radius, but he was not sure a 50-foot turn
radius was possible because of the large power pole on the north side of the driveway.
Mr. Clark noted the traffic study addressed that concern on page 15 of that report.
.
Vice Chair Zimmerman opened the public hearing at 7:50 p.m.
Vice Chair Zimmerman invited applicant to make comments.
Mike Black, Royal Oaks Realty, thanked staff for their work. He indicated they agreed
with all of the conditions in staff's report. He indicated there would be minor changes to
the proposal, including the canopy. With respect to the hardy board, this was an upgrade,
which was more expensive than the stucco work. He noted stucco was not an acceptable
product in the Neighborhood Business district. He indicated the hardy board had a baked
on surface, which would go all of the way up to the top of the window and they would
only put the hardy board where the stucco is located on their elevations. He stated
because this was a POD, they needed to determine if this fit into the neighborhood and
location. He stated they were platting this like a townhouse where the individual
business person will purchase a unit and a lot, but they would also use lot 31 as common
land, which included the parking and green space area. He indicated the lot size per unit
was small than they had in the normal neighborhood business, but in common they were
below or within many of the standards. He noted the traffic engineer had requested they
open the radius as wide as possible. He stated they might be able to shift the driveway a
little to the south, but there was a problem with the large utility pole on the north side of .
the driveway. He stated the right-of-way along Highway 96 was wide enough to
accommodate the right turn lane - it just needed to be striped.
.
.
.
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - JUNE 1, 2005
8
Vice Chair Zimmerman inquired about units 26-30 and the potential of one tenant being
in the entire building. Mr. Black stated this was a large local real estate company that
was looking to move.
Vice Chair Zimmerman asked if it was the intent to sell each individual office
condominium to individual businesses. Mr. Black replied that was correct, with the
exception of units 26-30.
Vice Chair Zimmerman asked if they had established any association rules yet. Mr.
Black replied they had not work on those covenants yet, but they were very easy to put
together. He stated they were okay with including no subleasing into their restrictions.
He stated they could eliminate restaurants in this development as they were not intending
on putting in any restaurants. He also stated he was not sure there would be any retail
businesses in this building. He noted they intended to market this to professionals such
as accountants, attorneys, real estate developers, etc.
Mr. Black indicated there was one minor modification made on the south end of the
development where the Rice Creek Watershed was requiring them to not encroach upon
the wetland at all, so they needed to reduce some of the parking along the south line by
eliminating four parking spaces to address the Rice Creek Watershed's concern.
Michael Spack, Traffic Data, Inc., stated he had met with the Ramsey County Traffic
Engineer and they agreed on the parameters of the study. He stated they had addressed
the proposed driveway on both Highway 96 and Hamline A venue. He summarized parts
of his report for the Commission.
Commissioner Bezdicek asked how people going north on Hamline Avenue would get
into traffic. Mr. Spack rcplied they would need to sit in traffic at the stop light and there
would be gaps in traffic to get onto Hmnline Avenue.
Commissioner Bezdicek asked how many parking spaces were there in this development.
Commissioncr Larson noted there were 306 parking spaces.
Mr. Spack stated the County Traffic Engineer also believed that the traffic numbers
would actually go down with the improvement of Lexington Avenue this summer.
Vice Chair Zimmerman invited anyone for or against the variance to come forward and
make comment.
Audrey GlIttersen, 1389 Arden View Drive, (by letter) stated: "I am writing in regards to
concerns I have for the proposed office park. I will be in MI on June 1 so won't be able
to attend the hearing on June 1.
I mn the owner of 1389 Arden View Drive. My unit is one of two closest to the proposed
POD. I have several concerns about the planned lighting: The lighting pedestal closest
to Lot 20 is very close to my residence and the illumination would be annoying. Is that
light necessary for your adequate illumination?
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - JUNE 1,2005
<l
I mn also concerned about the removal of trees from AHNA common land on the south .
boundary of the proposed office park. My residence now is a beautiful wooded lot and
abounding with wildlife - deer, wild turkeys, ducks, fox, and birds.
I would like you to investigate building a berm along the southeITUllost boundary next to
the proposed road and have well established trees planted on this berm. This would
improve the background appearance of the office park in addition to allowing AHNA to
retain its wooded appearance.
Thank you for your consideration."
Elwood F. Caldwell, 1451 Arden View Drive, stated "The Arden Hills North Homes
Association, which represents the owners of the 140 townhomes directly south of and
adjacent to the proposed development, stands by its comments addressing to Planning
Commission members dated May 24, 2005 and attached with other appendices to the
staff memorandum dated June 1, 2005 by Peter Hellegers, City Planner. The additional
comments below apply first to the 17 specific conditions upon which the staffs
recommendation is contingent, and then to other section of the memorandum.
At the outset, many of the 17 conditions deal with the technical details of implementing a
complex project, for which the staff is to be commended, and which call for no special
cOlrunent from us, as interested as we are in the project. This applies to Nos. 1-3,8, 10,
11, and 13-17.
Our comments on the other conditions are as follows:
.
No.4: Uses proposed for the development.
We agree that only one business should be permitted to occupy anyone lot, but do not
find it acceptable that one business may occupy as many as six lots. Although office uses
are currently proposed, NB zoning includes clinics, a host of retail uses (specifically 33
are named in the ordinance), and restaurants with a Special Use Permit. The staff
analysis on page 4 states "If... the Planning Commission did not want a retail use, which
is otherwise permitted in the NB district, a condition should be added to the PUD
document." We stronglv advocate the addition of such a condition, applicable to retail
and restaurants. A retail business owning as many as six or even three units could
occupy an entire building.
Moreover, it is possible, indeed likely, that individual owners may attempt to sublease a
part of their space to another business, especially with the eleven walkout units having
separate lower entrances. We strongly oppose this and urge the Planning Commission to
do the same. Note on page 5 it says "If the desire of the Planning Commission is to
maintain the units as one user per unit, then a conditions should be added to the PUD
document to that effect."
No.5: Applied a 30% limit (i.e., 9 of the 30 units) to the replacement by retail of the .
office uses now proposed.
Since as indicated above we oppose any replacement of office use by retail, we regard
this condition as irrelevant. Under it, and if the acceptability of a business occupying as
many as six lots is not changed and retail is not prohibited, one whole six-unit building or
.
.
.
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - JUNE 1, 2005
10
two three-unit buildings could be occupied by what would effectively be one retail
business.
No.6: Points out that restaurants could occupy space within the development with a
Special Use Permit. As with No.5 above, ifretail and restaurant uses are prohibited by a
provision in the POD document, as we advocate, this condition is irrelevant.
No.7: Prohibits residential use of any of the units in the proposed development. We
agree with this condition.
No.9: Recommends establishment of a comprehensive sign plan for the development.
As pointed out in our previous comments dated May 24, we regard 30 square feet of
wall sign permit unit as excessive, whether in the form of an upright panel about 3 x 5
with a light over it or the horizontal elongated "optional" panels about 2 x 10 shown on
the building elevation sheet.
A very similar development in Lakeville by the smne company with substantially
identical building elevations uses much more discrete wall signs, per the photographs we
have submitted. If this works in Lakeville, it can work in Arden Hills. We strongly
recommend that the Planning Commission specify that type and size of all sign (only)
only for this development.
Notwithstanding the staffs interpretation of how the square footage of the free standing
entrance monument sign would be calculated, it's the 30 wall signs and not the entrance
sign that represent our concern.
No. 12: Recommend submission of a revised lighting plan.
As stated in our previous submission, we recommend elimination of the light pole and
the southernmost three or more parking stalls adjacent to lot 20, which is the closest to
residences at 1389 and 1390 Arden View Drive. As pointed out on page 12, the lighting
proposed along the south boundary of the development is in excess of requirements for
adjoining residential property.
Comments on sections of the memorandum other than the 17 specific conditions:
1) Access.
As pointed out in the Plan Review Comments under item "0" on page 13, and
notwithstanding the equivocal approval implied in the traffic study, access to the
development from Hamline Avenue will be problematic and will contribute to
congestion already existing as times south of Highway 96 at the Arden View Drive
entrance. We direct the attention of Planning Commission members to the
recommendation on page 15 of Attachment 4b-3, the Traffic Impact Report, to
"Construct larger than required radius (50 foot radius if feasible) on the northwest and
southwest comers of the Hamline Avenue/Karth Lake Circle/Site Access intersection
to improve traffic flow in and out of the site." No such radiuses are shown on the
plat, and in fact, there is a very large wood utility pole right at the northwest corneL
Among other things, we urge the Planning Commission to require the plat to show
such radiuses and that they be constructed.
2) Landscape lot area.
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - JUNE 1, 2005
11
In our May 24 comments under "Drainage," we questioned the applicant's claim of
"40.3% open space" and requested professional confirmation. As indicated in item
4A on page 13, staff has calculated the landscape lot area to be closer to 33%, about
5,000 square feet below NB zoning requirements of 35% in view of the latter's
exclusion of areas less than 10 feet in width or less than 500 square feet in area.
Replacement of 15 parking spaces in three areas selected by staff but not specifically
identified would increase landscape lot area to at least 35%, still well below the
claimed 40%. If this is done, our identification of parking spaces adjacent to Lot 20
and closest to residences on Arden View Drive for removal should be included in the
number.
.
3) Other recommendation.
In several cases other than identified above, staff has recommended inclusion of
conditions in the POD document that mayor may not be included in the 17 specific
conditions of approval. Exmnples are the requirements in item 4A that Rmnsey
County approve planting in the right of way area (on page 6) and that landscaping in
the buffer yard area include coniferous trees (on page 7.). We support all such
recommendations."
Jim Bharmal, 4540 Keithson Drive, stated he missed the May 24 meeting because he did
not get the meeting notice. He indicated when he bought is house in 1990, he bought it
thinking he was going to live in a residential neighborhood and the only structure by his
house was the City office and public works building, which he was okay with, but now he .
was looking at 300 parking spaces and a 30-unit office complex which he did not want.
He stated he felt betrayed by the City. He expressed concern about the number of
buildings and he felt it would be an invasion of his privacy. He expressed concern about
the lighting and the effect the lighting would have on his house. He stated he was 100
percent positive that the property values would decrease due to the increase in traffic
because of this project. He indicated this project was not fit for this particular area and he
requested they ensure that the people that lived on Keithson Drive that there would be
proper steps taken prohibiting any retail or restaurants from coming into the
development. He expressed concern about the large parking area. He requested this
development follow the rules and he did not want to be penalized as a homeowner.
Gale Van Buskirk, 1390 Arden View Drive, outlined negative impacts not considered:
Neec for an additional office building in Arden Hills is not justified in proposal or
marketing study. Is there a real market need for more office space in Arden Hills? Will
poor traffic access both in and out of the development dissuade potential office building
buyers? What are the negative impacts on the neighborhood and City of Arden Hills, if
office buildings are not sold? Estimates for loss of property values and quality of life of
surrounding residential properties not taken into account in the big economic picture.
She asked the Planning Commission to look at the bigger details in their decision tonight.
She proposed they erect an 8 to 10 foot high berm along the southern border of the
devclopment with conifers on top of it. She stated the advantages for the developer
would be to provide additional landscape (over 5000 square feet), without losing 15
parking spaces; adds attractive setting to development; consistent with berm on eastern .
border of development; utilizes surplus soil from grading; no soil removal; eliminates
retaining walls and their maintenance; promotes good water drainage with proper
sloping; retains rolling hill appearance of Highway 96 developments; contributes to
screening requirements of 60% opacity year-round without using fences. Advantages for
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION -- JUNE 1, 2005
12
.
Homeowners: Conceals partial view of development and Highway 96; tempers the
sounds from parking lot and Highway 96; provides consistent landscaping with existing
townhouse berms; reduces some loss of property values; prevents nuisance headlight
glare from parking lot and south drive. She noted "good berms make good neighbors".
Mike Giel, 4534 Keithson Drive, stated he had lived in his home for 15 years and he was
not opposed to an acceptable development of this area, but expressed concern for the
safety with respect to traffic for the residents on Keithson Drive and the townhomes. He
expressed concern about having two "U" turns in this area. He noted this was not only
dangerous, but it was a major imposition for the people coming out of Keithson Drive.
He indicated he did not accept the traffic report because that engineer did not "live with
this traffic experience". He stated this was a major safety concern and he did not
understand why the County would accept a "u" turn on Hamline and then another "U"
turn up the road. He noted Mounds View High School used this area as a major
thoroughfare to getting to school. He stated he wanted a cut-through in the island so a
"U" turn was not necessary. He also suggested they turn the buildings 26-30 to face the
parking lot and eliminate the road onto Hmnline. He stated it was the people who made
Arden Hills and it was the people who had to stay in the City, not the businesses.
.
John Lawyer, 4539 Keithson Drive, stated he had lived in his home since 1977. He
indicated he did not oppose the development, but would like to see it better insulated
from the neighborhood so it did not disturb the quality of neighborhood life. He
expressed concern about the pedestrian trail to the west ofthe property and that it not take
the appearance of an alley way. He indicated they used the trail at least twice a day. He
expressed concern about the fenced in trash dumpster and the brick wall of the
westernmost units of the development, which was 10 feet from the edge of the foot trail.
He suggested a berm along the western side. He requested the trash dumpster be located
somewhere other than the western edge of the property. He expressed concern about the
possibility of retail space in this development. He suggested they consider eliminating
the possibility of retail space in this development.
Cindy Owen, 4490 Hamline Avenue North, stated she lived one block south of Highway
96 and had lived in her home for seven years. She stated she had a teenage son who was
going to Mounds View High School next year. She expressed concern about the traffic
on the road and the noise that was generated by the traffic. She expressed concern about
the safety of the kids that were waiting at the bus stops. She also expressed concern
about the speed the County Sheriff uses on Hamline Avenue.
.
James Pinckney, 1425 Arden View Drive, stated there appeared to be four areas of non-
compliance in this development, and he did not see any variances from the developer. He
asked for justification from the developer as to these non-compliances. He asked if the
developer had looked at all of the possibilities for landscaping. He expressed concern
about the traffic study and the potential future and existing traffic problems. He stated
traffic from the TCAAP project was just starting to build and he believed Guidant was
less than half way into their expansion and hiring for a significant expansion of their
facility. He believed the traffic study was flawed and it appeared to him that there were
big issues related to this. He asked if a modification to Highway 96 was a possibility to
allow better access. He acknowledged there will be an increase in traffic in the City in
the next five years, but he was concerned they were not addressing two major projects
that added to the traffic right now (TCAAP and Guidant).
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - JUNE 1, 2005
13
Jim Clark, 4528 Keithson Drive, expressed concern about the traffic. He asked them to
take into consideration the winter months and the blind spot on the road. He believed
there would be an increase in traffic accidents in the area with this development. He
stated he liked the nice, low profile of the buildings on the north side of Highway 96 off
of Hamline and suggested they have low profile buildings in this development also. He
noted in the future he believed Hamline would be generating considerable more traffic
once the TCAAP area was developed. He also expressed concern about his property
value decreasing. He believed the development would look better and fit in better where
the shopping center was located up on Highway 96.
.
Jan Cather Weaver, 1435 Arden View Drive, stated she would also like a berm as
previously suggested. She expressed concern regarding the landscaping on the front side
of Highway 96. She asked how the buildings would be landscaped so they did not look
like a shopping mall or rental units with all of the aspbalt. She expressed concern about
the wildlife and requested that the wildlife not be disrupted with this development. She
asked who would manage any vacated unit. She believed there was a lack of interest in
this type of a development in the City. She asked if the traffic study had taken into
consideration thc increase of traffic in the next five to ten years. She expressed concern
that Arden View Court would be used as a "U" turn. She stated she bought her home
because it was a quiet neighborhood and expressed concern about the human ecology of
Arden View Drive and Arden Hills.
Mike Black stated with respect to traffic, they had a report from a professional engineer .
trained in traffic and there was a very detailed report done for this area. He stated based
on this zoning, land use and development, the traffic being generatcd from this project
would not have a significant impact to the traffic. He indicated during high traffic times,
people would seek the easiest way in and out so there might be an occasional "U" turn.
He stated this was no different than anywhere somebody went. He suggested the City
have their engineer review the report. He noted the study had also been reviewed by the
Ramsey County Engineer, who had also agreed that this was an appropriate traffic
generated use for this location. He understood the frustrations the residents had with the
traffic, but those conditions were there today and providing a second way of ingress and
egress was a must to makc this development a viable project. He stated it was better to
provide for disbursement of traffic rather than having one access point and he did not
believe they could get the County's permission to cut an access into Highway 96. He
noted with the berm, they would need a minimum of 70 feet, which was not possible
unless the residents wanted part of the berm on their property. He indicated they could
look at a slight berm, but he was not sure it would work and there was a concern with
proper drainage also. He suggested they walk along the buffer are and add more
land~caping if needed. He stated landscaping was not an issue and if they wanted
additional landscaping, they were willing to do that. He did not believe they would
negatively impact property values and in fact, believed the property values would rise.
He noted this was a high end, quality office development and the value of this
development would increase the property values in the area. He stated they were willing
to discuss with staff with restricting retail and restaurants and it was their intention of .
having this strictly an office complex. With respect to the walkway along the westerly
edge, they would look at that area and attempt to provide some curves in that walkway
with additional landscaping, noting they were limited in space. With respect to the
dumpster location, all of the dumpsters would be bricked and roofed with a wood gated
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - JUNE 1,2005
14
.
front. Those dumpsters would be small accessory buildings that would be visually
pleasing. He stated if they could find another location, they would work with staff on
that. With respect to quality of life, he believed one reason they were here tonight was
because they recognized the quality of life in this area and they saw a strong market for
this _ype of a development. He stated they have had a tremendous amount of calls
regarding this development and knew that this development was going to be successful.
He indicated with any development, the wildlife and neighborhood would be disturbed,
but this area was ideal for this type of a development and it was a friendly, compatible
use to the area. He believed once they were done with the development, the wildlife
would come back into the area. He stated this development was only slightly modified
from the ordinances. He noted they had 40 percent open space and he believed they were
well within the spirit and intent of the Neighborhood Business zoning. He requested the
Commission recommend this proposal to go forward to the City Council. He stated they
were willing to accept all of the conditions noted in staff's report.
Vice Chair Zimmerman asked about unit turnover. Mr. Black stated these units would be
handled the exact same way as a townhome association would handle vacant units and
the maintenance would be an ongoing responsibility ofthe association.
.
Commissioner Bezdicek asked if they had completed a feasibility study. Mr. Black
replied their feasibility study was their experience and being able to successfully build
and close these types of developments, as well as a tremendous mnount of phone calls
they had received. He noted they would complete this project in two years.
Commissioner Bezdicek asked if they would have a certain amount of their Phase one
sold prior to start of construction. Mr. Black stated they would not proceed with the
project if they felt it would fail and they were confident that they would proceed with the
first phase and did not see any reason why they would not start the second phase. He
stated they have had 10 units that have already been asked about.
Commissioner Larson asked if there would be any multi-tenant units. Mr. Black replied
there would be no multi-tenant units and they were not proposing that type of a set up.
Mr. Caldwell requested they not adopt this tonight unless they were going to include the
provisions in the PUD document they were recommending.
Vice Chair Zimmerman closed the public hearing comment at 9:32 p.m.
Commissioner Larson stated he believed with the additional five recommendations given
tonight by staff and the comments made by at this public hearing, this needed to be tabled
for further evaluation. He indicated he had studied this for a couple of days and there
were a lot of things brought forward tonight that had not been considered and by tabling
this would give everyone a better chance to understand how this project worked.
.
Commissioner McClung concurred with those comments. He stated he lived in this part
of the City and the traffic has substantially changed in the past few years. He believed
they had some serious traffic challenges that needed to be looked at. He expressed
concern about the trail and having ten feet between the building and the edge of the trail
was not user friendly. He suggested they provide more depth behveen the trail and the
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - JUNE 1,2005
15
building. He stated he was not comfortable approving this tonight due to the additional
conditions given by staff tonight as well as the comments received by the public.
.
Mr. Clark stated they could continue this to the July 6 meeting and then turn this around
to the July 11 City Council meeting.
Commissioner Bezdicek moved, seconded by Commissioner McClung, to table the
public hearing on Planning Case No. 05-12 to the July 6, 2005 Planning Commission
meeting.
The motion carried unanimously (6-0).
Commissioner Larson moved, seconded by Commissioner Thompson, to move their July
13 Planning Commission meeting back to the original July 6, 2005 meeting date.
The motion carried unanimously (6-0).
UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS
None.
REPORTS
A.
Planning Commissioners
.
Commissioner Larson asked if there was any way they could pull signage out of an
approval and staff could approve signage, unless there was a variance involved. Mr.
Clark replied on a regular development, they could put in a provision that applicant had
to adhere to the sign ordinance, but in a POD it becmne complicated. He stated one of
the struggles was the City had a very restrictive sign ordinance.
B. Staff
None.
C. Council Memher
Mayor Aplikowski updated the Commission on recent City Council actions.
ADJOURNMENT
Commissioner Bezdicek moved, seconded by Commissioner Larson to adjourn the
meeting at 10:00 p.m. The motion carried unanimously (6-0).
.
.
.
.
Planning Commission Meeting
July 6, 2005
Attachment 4a - 4
/ '
-
TO:
FROM:
Department of Public Works
Kenneth G. Haider, P.E., Director and County Engineer
1425 Paul Kirkwold Drive
Arden Hills, MN 55112.393;J. (651) 266.7100' Pax (651) 266.7110
E.mail: Public.Works@co.ramseymn.lls
1--ffE~t:~.:.;' ,\,~ 1"~ ~'"
MAY 2 4 2005
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
MEMORANDUM
Peter Hellegers
City of Arden Hills
Dan Sol~,I'-...
RamseY'C~l~Public Works
SUBJECT: Arden Hills Office Park
DATE:
May 20, 2005
The Ramsey County Public Works Department has reviewed the Traffic Impact Report for the
Arden Hills Office Park. The County previously provided comments to the City regarding the
draft site plan on may 2, 2005. Ramsey County has the following comments regarding this traffic
study.
.
I. The County concurs with thc methodology used for trip generation and trip distribution as
discussed in the traffic study prepared by Traffic Data Inc. The development of Office
Condominiums on this site is expected to generate 868 trips per day.
2. Access to the site from the right in/right out driveway on Highway 96 will operate
adequately. The County agrees with the study recommendation to sign and mark the right
turn lane from westbound Highway 96 into the site. The developer will be required to add the
appropriate signs and markings to designate a right turn lane.
3. The proposed access on Hmnlinc A venue will be located at the existing access to the daycare
with the daycare driveway connected into this new entrance road. Left turns exiting onto
Hamline Avenue in the p.m. peak hour will be problematic. Northbound Hmnline Avenue
traffic frequently backs up past this entrance. This will result in delay for vehicles exiting the
site onto Hamline A venue. It is expected that if the delay here is to great, more vehicles will
use the access on Highway 96. This may result in U-turns on Highway 96 and Hamline
Avenue for drivers wishing to go west. This should not be a problem on a protected left turn
phase.
4. The County concurs with the other recommendations in the traffic study involving radius
points on the Hamline Avclllle access and stop signs at the daycare driveway.
.
Minnesota's First lIome Rnle County
i'rI[d";~ .',[, ,.:", :.,-1',,] r,ar"" '.-ilh,; lILinimum fJf ICr'\'. P()H-Co)ll~un'erCOnltil1
~
i.
']
5. The developer will be required to obtain a permit from Rmnsey County for work within the
right of way. This includes both access points and utility connections.
Thanks for the opportunity to make comments regarding this issue. If you have any questions or
need any additional information please give me a call at 266-7114.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Planning Commission Meeting
July 6, 2005
Attachment 4a - 5
1451 Arden View Drive
Arden Hills, MN 55112
.
June 8, 2005
Beverly Aplikowski, mayor
Scott Clark, conununity development director
Peter Hellegers. city planner
City of Arden Hills
1245 West Highway 96
Arden Hills, MN 55112
TMnk:s for the opportunity to meet this morning to discuss the proposed Arden Hills
Office Park, and to clarify the recommendations of the Arden Hills North Homes Association with
regard to it.
Attached is a list of the conditions. some modified from those presented June 1. under
which we would find approval of the PUD application by the Planning Commission acceptable. It
follows in format the list of conditions applicable to the staff s recommended approval as shown
on pages 15-17 of the major memo (Conditions 1-17) and in a subsequent update (Conditions 18-
22) dated June 1, 2005, both addressed by Peter Hellegers to the Planning Commission.
We will not object to a staffrecommendation of approval at the next hearing July 6 if our
proposed modifications to the conditions are included. However. we reserve the right to do so if
any are not included or are nullified by further conditions.
.
We request receipt in writing of those recommendations and conditions and ofany update
or addendum thereto sufficiently prior to July 6 to provide a reasonable amount of time for study.
Thanks again for the opportunity to meet for discussion, and (in advance) to do so again
should !subsequent events call for it.
Yours sincerely.
t~
Elwood F. Caldwell
cc: AHNHA president and board members
.
.
.
.
.
Conditions for approval of 05-12 (emphasis added):
I): The applicant shall submit revised plans complying with the comments from the Plan Review
Comments section of this report (14A), for review and approval.
2) and 3): No comment
4): Only one business shall be pennitted to occupy anyone lot within the development. If a
business owns and/or occupies more than one lot, the appearance of the building on those lots,
including signage, shall not be altered to consolidate the appearance and use of the building as
one business. [Explanation: We object to signage (other than the freeststanding entrance
monument sign) on building 26-30 that can be read from Highway 96 just across the pond, and
which, in our view, would detract from the "townhome~ appearance of the development.]
5): No retail use shall replace the office uses proposed for the development.
6): Restaurant which are listed as special uses for the Neighborhood Business District shall not be
permitted
7): No comment.
8): Add the following sentence: Include three or more of the southernmost parking spaces
adjacent to Lot 20 among the 15 parking spaces or other impervious suifaces to be eliminated to
bring the Landscape Lot Area to not less than 35%, as recommended in items 4A (page 6) and
9A (page 10) of the Plan Review bystqff, and under I4A. Plan Review Comments, as item "j" on
page 13.
9): Add the following sentence: Among other stimdards, wall signage for individual units shall
be limited to six square feet.
10) and II): No comment.
12): Add the following sentence: Specifically, the lighting pole west of Lot 20 shall be eliminated
or moved to at least 60 feet from the south property line to limit its visibility from the residences
at 1389 and 1390 Arden View Drive.
13) to 21): No comment.
22): With the provisions added to Condition 4 and Condition 9 as recommended under those
numbers above, Condition 22 becomes irrelevant and should si1DPly be deleted.
23): Revise the plat to show the larger than standard radii (50:foot recommended) on the
northwest and southwest comers of the Hamline AvenuelKarth Lake Circle/Site Access
intersection as recommended by the traffic study (A ttachment 4b-3) on page 14 of that
attachment, and stated to be concurred in by the County under 14A, Plan Review Comments, as
item "p" on page 13, and require those radii to be constructed
June 29, 2005
.
.
To: City of Arden Hills Plmming Commission
City of Arden Hills City Council
From: Gale E. Van Buskirk
Re: Old City Hall and Public Works Department PUD, Plmming Case 05-12
One hundred fifty four (154) citizens of Arden Hills have voiced their strong opposition
to the Old City Hall and Public Works Department PUD, Plmming Case 05-12, by
signing the enclosed petition. This broad-based opposition includes residents from two
townhome associations and twelve streets adjacent to the proposed development, as
itemized below.
Number of
Signatures
45
30
12
10
9
8
8
6
6
5
5
4
3
--L
154
.
Location
Arden View Drive (Arden Hills North Townhomes)
Arden View Court (Arden Hills Townhomes - "South Association")
Karth Lake Circle
Nursery Hill Lane
Keithson Drive
Amble Road
Wynridge Drive
Hmnline Avenue North
Arden View Drive (west oftownhomes)
Arden Vista Court
Royal Hills Drive
Snelling Avenue North
Nursery Hill Court
Wyncrest Lane
Total
The typical initial comment from the signers of the petition was, "Why wasn't I made
aware of this proposed development by the City of Arden Hills Newsletter?" After this
initial reaction, three major oppositions were voiced.
.
. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission
City of Arden Hills City Council
June 29,2005
Page 2
The fIrst major opposition was the traffic, such as the access road to Harnline Avenue,
proposed u-turns on Highway 96, and increased traffic in a currently congested area.
Typical comments from the signers of the petition were: "The City Council can not be
serious about approving an access road to Harnline A venue;" "U-turns shouldn't be legal
on Highway 96;" and "How many more accidents do we need on Hmnline Avenue before
the City Council will realize our problems and now they want to add more traffic!"
The second major opposition was the use of more property for neighborhood business
development, particularly in light of the current business development of Guidant and the
future business development in TCAAP. Typical comments included: "Can't we leave
the south side of Highway 96 for residential development and the north side for business
and governmental developments?" "Too much asphalt;" "Because of the'poor traffic
access, no business development should be put in that property;" and "Don't we have
enough business offices in Arden Hills already?"
.
The third major opposition was the impact on the environment and quality oflife in
Arden Hills. Typical comments included: "I moved to Arden Hills for the trees and now
they are going to cut them down;" "Wboever did the traffic study doesn't live here during
rush hour;" and "I'm tired of the City of Arden Hills always trying to make a quick buck
but not thinking about us taxpayers. Wbat's in it for us?"
I urge the Planning Commission and the City Council to take these concerns under
advisement when voting on Planning Case 05-12.
Sincerely,
&,A~~
Gale E. Van Buskirk
1390 Arden View Drive
enclosure (1 )
.
<ll
'"
ro
o
O'l
.!;
c:
c:
ro
c..
~
~
ro
<ll
e:::
If>
.>::
ro
o
ro
>-
o
e:::
>-
..Q
<ll
""
'"
'"
.>::
~
o
S
'"
~
::!
o
..c:
.c
'"
::!
~
f1) ~
v,
e>.:: ~ <:D
'0-- ~ ~ '. ~
" ;0.,) "-
, ~ r-- "--
'Y) .~ I}:. ~ ------- 'l-- C'--
''YJ '>- ) ~
'(j ~ -J'--- M
-3 ~ ~ IY1
I \.0 f'0 0()
0) ) ~ '-.P '--.3
~ t;' \J)
--.9 ~ ~ ~ i/J
--sl ~
<00 \}
~ i'l .tJ
~ t>
'n ,
0 'l- J ~
"- I
ell "" N)
c: "" ~ l"l '-9
0 '-.. -...sI I
.c " I ~
c.. ----
"1 \r-,
'1
JJ ~ ..J;)
!II
If>
<Il
...
'0
'0
<I:
\;
'0 t:
.l!! y
c: 'eo
";: G~
<Il ~
E
<II ~
Z
,
J
,~
'It
'"
:..
~
'"
Q)
U
ro
0..
'"
c:
<0
~
O'l
-0
c:
ro
<fJ
<ll
Q)
~
-
.....
o
c:
o
t5
::!
~
-
<fJ
Q)
'0
g U
"C E
::! (1l
-0 ~
-
>- '0
CD .~ ~
.Q en ~
.n >- 0.. Q)-
c::! ro'" '02
Oc.. ;:0<0
..c: _ c:
;-0 0)<.0 -
._ c: .- 0> O'l
~ro I>-"'.S
'" c:roQ)-
a.ro O:;:g-B,
I '" ..c: <ll =
~ f= .2> -0 -0
(3 :; I 'w ~
-+j-o~ro
-0 ::Jc: Q)
o 0>(1l0'l~
c: c: U
Q) ._Q)~C:
cIJ:J......~
~ ::;Jt:c
b c~5"8~
_ ..c:W<{CO:J
c :J..c.....
<ll 5: <ll '" (; c:
E U,C"- ctS
w .- 0 .n ~
0.. CE_..c:::J
..Q __ ill CD (J) .~ 19
<ll~~I<ll<ll(f)
> ~ ro ::J C <0
Q.)OQ..crncl....
-o~UO>O'O
-o<ll\;:::U>-_C
Q) I..- ..... ,- t 0 co
<fJo>~~<llro=
Oc.......I....a..n.rn
c.. -- U"J ...... 0 E +-'
o $: :J -0 I.... .- @
1....000)0.0)-
a.. = "'0 (f) '+- > rn
(])J2rn(tlO:;::;+:;
..r: ," N <D c/) ctI C
..........\1.> l....(/)O)ID
(l)..cmuOQ)......
W::IE...JZ&
o 0
0..'- I
o..~
oN
Q)"7
:?l!)
;>0
f\
~
'-
"J
\to-.
'"
-----....
-
"'i
~
<...
'V
'"
'---
\.)
'--
>-...
~
"""
'V
'0
~
.'"
~
\)
\)
(\1\
'--- ......
-.S ~
....... ~
'"
~ 'U
~ ,i
(\ \oJ ----
~ 3- ,...
'::; i -C
~ ~
X
(-... 0) :st
A r-
t y ::::t--
....... N ---;:r- :::t-
--r ~
('4 d ~
"" Vi
n ij VI
ct=---Y
Y t1.~
0 '2 .c
f \U ~
~ S
\-- <::5
Vl C:-L
i~
~
.......
-.......
u
S;
\:l
..:::c "",~
-< 0 '
;;) --i2 '"
~ :~~{
<:. i;J "'.:>-
S '\! ~
~~\ij
<j)
'S:'
~
VJ
;)
"'\
.
\1
.....
o
~I
Q)
0>
(1l
c..
.
.
.~ !'/)
f) ~ 0-- ~. ~ .:x:, <:\; ex,
.Q) <U :"J "'...) \J\
C '0 \K i:>G \sJ -.t rl ~ C)
~ 0 ::r ) ""-:: ~ ()) ......
'" "" , I , I ~ ~
'" Q) Ai, fir) ~ (If:' 'I\', I Ci\ - ,
ro 0 0 iV1 rn -<)\ re )0 ~
0 ro .^,,- ~ m '" N\ n
0. <Il ~ '-D \9 .~~ '-D ---9
OJ '" C \ ~ "-3 ~ ~ ~
e e 0 ~ l;; ~ , , I I \:[
~ I \f} .F"-
e Q) .:= 1.1"\ S ~ -:--......
e Q) 0- ~ ~ '" UJ
!!! ~ "l ~ 'SJ -'D ,,::J
0> "!J '-J) -S) ~ .....
0- I 0
~ --0
C C j <<I
ro ~
ro '" ~ '0t ~ gJ '\J
Q) Q) <1>
c:: <1> .~ "7. ::> ;,. 0>
~ V U ro
'" - .~ 6 -
~ ..... "" 3 0..
ro 0 :::.
C>-
o e: e 4: '--.:) "" <0 ~
::> 0 -:::1 ~ j
<ii 0 n tII --
>> .s= ::> tII ~ -...... ;:a
0 ~ Q) --=:t ~
c:: .:= - ...
'" '" "0 ~ '::::= ~
>> ::> <1> "0 ~ ~ ~
.D ~ --0 <
Q) 0> is ~ ~
- e ~ f .~
'ii) 'C :E ~ ~
::> ro v"'
<f) --0 ~ ~ ~ J
~ - .;,
~ >> --0 "\: Q ::S ===<
~ - '\Y
tIl e 0 < <
CD .- ro Zl .~ '-. j t (i:l
.2 Q) 0 'n
Q) Q) ~ ---- '-S -..:;,
.D >>0. 0 )--- "" ~ ~ \jl
-~ ro '" '0 s:: ""
3 Q) ~ \1'
e '- '---- ~
.s= -
0> CD -
._ Q) 0>
._ e :c >>""~
_ro
Q)= c:COQ).:E A
c..ro o3gg s: \a
:c w..LQ)- "0 0 " J
;:;- e .'2>--0 --0 ..0:::. .> ~
10..- .- Q,) Q)
<3 ::>:C"'", .... ~ p vJ ..,;;
-+r""U~CU C
32 ::J C 0) ~ .;: . ) ~
0 o>C'Oc:;C) -:; ~ .~ \J :;
.S: (J) U .S ,
Q) (IJ::Jc-"- \j ~ G1
.s= ::>C::>-oQ) J
-
..... e ~ 0 0 <f) :::l ~ ~ s::-
O Q.l<(t:O::1 ~ \;:S
- ...c ::J.s:;;.-+-" \,) ~ (
e 3: Q) '" 0 C '- 0J "iJ
Q) Cl.....crn ~
E en .- 0 I.- ~ '>
cE.......c::> DL ~ \lj
n... l.- wO)l"C5 ...j
o .. Q) m <l>"(i) (i)
Q)~'lii:c::>eQ)
> - ~
Q)Oo.croc-o
"l:J rJ 0 0 > 0 c:
--OQ):E.2i?t5t1l
Q)~tIlil::Q)tIl=
U)O>~~CLa...m
O.~ C/) .... 0 E Q)
a. 3- ::::J -0 ~ .- l....
eOO<1>Cl.<1>-
0.. = "'0 (f) '0 > .~
o L... m :.;:::; +-'
Q)'+- en Q) f/) ro C
..LQ)Nl..-C/)O)<D
......... roO +-'
<1>..c:cco<1>O
C/)::: _-JZCL
00
. 0...... I
o.~
0"1
Q)~ ' ,
S~ .,
'It ,; J <"\ "'" "^
- -.>. 0- "'" .,--- 2 ~ ,.:,
-
-- -- -- N
- -
<'II cr--- ry Y0 (~
l-, '!J ~ 3
s::: 0--.. --..'J g, ~
~ 0 r+-- ~ ~ .<:J ~
(1) en "" '-..9 ()... 0- .~
en (1) I .-- 'f ~
rn '-' y;---- I .' k, \.j)
() rn 0 if' J;, <Yo ~ ~ .-<\ .
a. <Y) '" 1\1 :"f\. ~ <<'- I
0> en Q) --.9 ~ \'(\ "1
.~ !: ~ 'i) '-Q ~ ~ 0 ")
C C 0 , \ \ ,'--- \ r\ 'Y
Q) ..!: ~ t) ~ '" ~
C Q) ...... \
rn ~ c.. cD "\ \-4 V\ ':-:... I ~I
c.. 0> --.D ~ ':: " '-..9 '-, \-
~ -0 " ~ v ~ '1
~ C -
rn "Il 0
(ij en ~ ~ "'"JI
Q) Q) .\
0:: (1) j ~
~ ~ ~ d L Q;-
~ ~ Q)
- '< Q 0>
rn 0 { <:\: J rn
0 "- c..
~ c "" 'k 1-
rn ::> 0 0 II <1\ .~ ~l )
0 :;::; ''V>
>. .<:: '-' 1/1 "0 ~ ~ "\, ,~ a
0 ::> 1/1 i: 'J .\(,1
0:: .<:: ~ l!! ~
~
en en j--- 'l: [ ~ ---=::
>. ::> (1) 'C '" Q .::::::,. /.J
.0 ~ -0 'C - - ~.
<1: ~ j "
Q) 0) <5 'U .~ 'b ~ ;;::.
"" C ~ ~
en 'C IE '- S> J '~ v
~ ::> rn \~ ~ Q! ~ '0
-0 ~ U
~ ~ <\;- .~
0 >. -0 ~ ~ ~ ~
s (0 .!!! !: --.)
rn c-E; l\! "\ Ik.
.2 m'-' I/) " c\- t;:-
(1) (1)- ~ ~ ~ ';Q
:D >.0. -::r- % --Cl '0
rn en .2 IV) ~ ':t <;i)
c: ::> :;: (1) 0 -:;r ::)... ~ J' >-- :J :t
00.. .<:: - C '::l--. - ----- ('{\
:;::;-0 0)(0 - ------
,_ C ._ m 0) i "
_rn I >. en.~
Q)= ccuG>1: \:!, "
a..rn 0:;:'-'0) .\: ';:\ 'J J ;0. .
I .r:::. C._ )--.
en Q) - of
>. C .!2> -0 -0 "tl ~ <:u <;. .~ '{ ~
.t ::; I'oo ~ Q) .c
() ....
..."'O~ctI s::: <;i. .-? ~
-0 ::> C Q) '': / :,t \J c .,.,
0 OlCOC'>1.- 0 \~ ~
C '-' C); ....f
.~ Q) .- C t
<ll (/)::;-g~ Q) .~
.<:: E OJ oJ ,.('
~ ~C:::::J"'CQ) Y-
- c ~ e 0 f/) <'II \!l ~ D V
0 Z :?-
Q)<(~O::> N ~
~ ..c :J ..r:; -- cf' "'-t
C :;: Q) en (; C ~
(1) c"-...om ~ D '---.3, r:., .;
E en .- 0 "- --J "" <0 >-
0. cE-'<::::> 1-:; <:t: 2 OJ
~ O)rn \.0 \9/:) I-
o .. cD co en .- ........
<D<f.l~IQ)Q)cn "b--
> c: m =' c <D
Q.)oa.croc~
-ogj,-,O> 0-0 ~
._ 0 >. c
-0 Q) ~ .- t:: 13 rn ~j
(1).....rn~ -
(/) CJ) 1- en <D co .-
oc-l-a..Q..s
0.'- en - 0 E (1)
o ;: :J "'0 I.... .- L..
~00(1)0.Q)- .... .~
0...="'0 (/'J'+- > m <'II ~
o......roO.-:;::;: s:::
(l),+-COQ) me J
:5u>NI-~o>Q)
,.ecou - l/)
<ll~I!:oQ)O
en~ _...Jzo.. ;;;;
o 0
0.- I ~
o.~
ON ~
0)";"
s~
'It M '<I- ):;.
'"' N ?!; "" .
\" <K> ;S 'C
P "" "'" '"' '"
N-., M.
OJ ~
.q) c ~ .,-.1\ --... ~~
0 ~ ~ ~ !Xl ~
(j) +> if) B f'- '--1'
(/) q) ~ ;r
t1l <.:> 0 Cl 'b ~ ('{\ tr'" ~ ~
t1l I
0 a. Ql f" I '0 0f r
0) <J} C '~ ----- I 1 --9 .-9
''--... -..3 II -!--, \:[
c c 0 >-'\ C\J\. I
C Ql ~ 't")/) '" [f\ [VI '-----j '0
c q) c.. '0 ~ -..3 "S), ~ ~ ~ \-/1
.!!! ~ -
0) ''-Q 0
c.. '0 ~[
~
~ c Q'
t1l
t1l <J} Ql
q) q) <---6 :t: ~ 0>
c::: Ql (tl
~ '-
(/) - <11 c..
- ~ "Z ~
-""" 0 "\'
(tl 4
0 (/) c J
'- 0 j ~ ~
::> ',p ~ :-
(tl 0 0 '" Cj) .~ ~ ~
>- ..c ::> '" ~
0 ~ Ql -::; '< :::, ~
c::: ..c - .... "-'
(/) (/) '0 <-
Ql " '-':,---.., ~
>- ::> '0 '2 --s.: .~ '-" ~
.D '- "0 <( "
q) 0) <5 q.; -u ":::> s: ;:
"=' c ~ -l: s: "
(/) .;:: :E --{ '- ,"" ~ j'c
(/) ::> (tl <:;:i;; ~ j '3
"0 ~ '''''
-""" - \,
~ >- "0
0 C ~ \.., VI
3; (tl rn f'- ':)- ~ ----y
co .- ~ -----y
.2 "'~ cD I"" ..j )":! <os-' :oj-- J
>-0. .2 j- J tf:) ~ 0 c-l ~ ?
.D r<j V-
-~ (tl (/) 0 --- -... ~ -----.,
;;: q) c
..c -
<0 -
.g> '" 0> J
- (tl :r: >- (/) .S III
Q)= c::<<J<UE
Q.rn o ;;: g .g> Q ~
:r: ..cq)-
>- E .gJ ~ ~ '0
"=' :J I (J) en .2l .:.'(
0 ....u~rn c: <os
'0 :::J: C 0) ~ .;: ~ C -::>
0 cnC'lJcu S ,C::[
.~ Q):O-~ Ql \.JJ <:::J
Ql cn:Jc'-"' E ~ :::r::
..c ::)C:::JUQ) ~
- C ~ 0 0 (/) <U ~ \:l\
- z 1: '-..:> ----'c::::::.
0 W<{t:O:::J 'V.
- .c :::J .c +-' ,<;: r-J -:i S --.l
c ;;: q) (/) C5 1ij \j \~
Ql '- \~
E f/).~o..o,- -i -----l
cE,+-..c:::J H l.'J
0.. '- (/') CD CO
o .. Q) CU Q) 'm 1i5
Q)(/):::::I::JcQ)
>crn _ l....
q)Oo.crnc-o
-o<l)oO>Oc
rn .- (,) >....... C'lJ
-0 Ql :t:: .- t 0
Ql'-(tl:t::Ql<ll=
C/)0).b~a..a.C13
O.f:cn+-'oECi>
a.. 3- :::J ""0 '- .- '-
eOOQ.)c..Q)-
0..= "0 en C > .~
o l.... m :;:;........
Ql....rnQl<l)(tl~
:5ill~t;f/)~"",
...c cOO
~::::r:_--lZa..
00
0..- I
.o..~
001
~
Ql .
3;2 ~ "" \., ...:.l"'=.. "., ...... ~
M 0() <"<\ M "" "" 4;: '"
Q)
'"
co
o
(J)
C
'c
C
co
a..
~
z-
Cii
Q)
0:::
'"
-'"
co
o
en
'--
:>
o
.c
.c
en
:>
'-
(i)
Q)
o
co
a.
en
C
Q)
Q)
'--
(J)
"0
c
co
en
Q)
Q)
'--
~
-
o
C
o
+:;
o
::>
'-
-
'"
Q)
"0
is
:E
~
-
co
>-
o
a:::
>-
.n
Q) 0)
~ c:
(f'J 'c
::>
J:! "0
o >'-g
S <D'~ co
.!2 (J) al Q)
>-0. 0
.n CO '" '0
s::::> :;:Q) C
Oa.. ~0" 01
.."0 ._ (J) C
-- C I >. C/) __
_Q)CU ccu(l)~
;>00)
'" '" 0;> C._
....I .cQ)-
'" 0)"0 "0
>. E -- .- cD
."'t:: :JIooC/)
<-) -+t"'O~ct5
"0 :::ScOl~
(J)coco
o C Q) 'i5 .S
Q) 'oo::J C -...
..c ::>c:>"oQ)
~ cQ)OOtF>
'0 Q)>:;::o:J
.c<:>.c-
C 3=<VfJ)O~
Q) c~..o,-
E "':.=o.c:>
a. E E ';;; .!2> 2
o -- Q) co Q) Q) '"
-Q)"':l::I::>cQ)
em _ l-
>oQ..croC:"'O
~"'oo>oc
m'-o>.-m
"0 Q) :t:: .- t 0
Q)'--co:t::Q)co=
en O>~ ~ a.. 0.2
oC",-oEQ)
Q. 'S "'0 '- .- '-
e~ ~ Q) 0.. a> co
a.. = "1:l CJ) '+- .~ :p
o'-roo-c
a.>'+-CO(l)(/)ctJQ.)
.L:Q)Nlo.....o"'O)~
........... rn OIDQ
Q):5IE.....lZa..
'" '--
00
0.- I
o.~
ON
~
Q) ,
S~
o
""
o
,
b-o
N
--9
y
c;:>--
N .~
G~
~
,
----
---
'v1
..0
5
ril
CJ
lJ)
("\\
~
CJ\
~
/J
CJ
------ ""'
'0 "'"
.
'"
l:
o
:;:;
b
(.
o
V
r
oJ+
~ '~
52 ~f)
V1 fj;
7':J
~
c,
'--'
\
)~
~ '--'"
.----
m
'"
~I
-
o
1.-)1
Q)
0)
co
a..
-
~
0-
J)
r:;
''-!<
""
'--J
Y.
.<v--.
N->
-...D
,
o
Ql
l:
o
..l:
a..
t;;
c
---0
t"
v
~
~
--.::;;-:
:J>
\,..,
r/,
-
III
III
Ql
'-
"0
1J
<(
r
!-
CJ
<::i
<(
--l
+d
j ,
~ /~
~
'"'
tJ
-J,
"7"
:J
.
--J
.(
ccJ
~ -
~
:x
()
~
c;:
\
---.>
~
C>
i.JI
rJ
G
\"
<:)
OJ
rJ
-'>
tL
(--J
---
1J
<Il
-
l:
.;:
~ 6 .)
~-:3~
r: <" ~
F~~
0) ~ ~
~ -i ~
A ~<~
J,Jtl~l
~ -z Jr q
~ .~ ;d
<...... --= -0
i..3 J "u
1 ~ ~
~ ~ Cj
~
<Il
E
'"
z
<Il
...
:>
...
'"
l:
VI
;t:
~ :.,;
'"
'^
::&: ~
,"'I '<I- \...,
~ '" V\
.
.$
'"
'"
o
OJ
c
c
c
~
e:-
>-
~
(ij
$
e:::
'"
.><:
'"
o
(/)
~
:J
o
.I::
.I::
'"
:J
~
UJ
$
o
'"
C.
'"
c
$
~
OJ
"0
<=
'"
'"
$
$
~
-
-
o
<=
o
+:;
o
:J
~
.....
'"
$
-0
C5
:t=
'"
~
-
~
o
e:::
>-
.D
$ OJ
_ C
"00 "C
:J
'" "0
t
o >--0
> <ii <=
> <0'- '"
.2 Q)~ <Ii
.D >- c. .2
C:J "'''' 0
.~C ~: ~
.- 0) C
.....rn I>,.r.n--
...__ <=",$1"
'" -"oOJ
a.'" o>c._
I (/).I:: $-
C OJ "0 "0
>- .- .- $
...... :s I (/) (I)
<3 +r1::J~m
"'0 ::J C 0> ~
OJ"'co
o .S: Q) U .S:
<D cn::Jc"""'-
....c ::JC:J""OQ)
....... cQ)ooVJ
o Q)~t:o::J
_ ..r;,.........:J..c:.......
c :;; $ (/) 5 ~
<l) C'-..o~
E ~ '-E .2 .I:: :J
0.. '- (f) .2> 19
O..<D(tl:Q)Q)(/)
1'l~C/):t:::::r::JCQ)
\,I,o'C(U _ I-
a;oo..croc"'O
"O(/)oo>oc
("Ot.i:::o>-,.........m
-0 Q) >+--' .- 1:: 0
$~"':!::$"'=
cnO)~~o..a.E2
OCcn--O (J)
a.";:: :J"U 1.-'- I-
200$0.$(0
0..- "'0 fJ') '+-- >--
Q,-<uO:t=ic
Q),+-mQ)t/)mQ)
...c:Q)N"-C/)O'J_
- roUOQ,)O
$:SIE-lzo...
(/) ~
o 0
.~~I
$ ,
s;g
. ,
's:::,
~
~
"J
Q) '--0
C I
o '---
.r:: \r-:;
Q, ';"J
III
III
<ll
...
-0
-0
<(
00
>>5
"'--'
G>
E
<'<l
Z
'2
'2.
~
~
~
:3\(j
';t
"t:
';J
'i:
~
~
~
oS
----i
Q)
...
:J
.....
<'<l
C
fI)
~
j, N-
"^ 'LA
"
~
~ "(.
L('
~
\)
C'.
'I:l
'){,
'11
~
\:1
-
o
'01
$
OJ
'"
0...
'-..Sl
J
~
.-tn
----Sl
':::\
~
i
'v
,)
~
~
."'-
\;;
"
"
s:
\J
-l..
~
~
N
"-\
~
o >-
.---.s.;: 0
[--/
~
""
""
;t R: '--8 .
~ "" -;---'"
;; r>--- "
c ~ c-v-- '----- 'zl
0 ----.3
.. \ \ .......
~
</) " a
<!) 0 ----- (Q \~.
<!) '-' I.f\ V7 "-.
</) rn (I) ~ .Hi
rn 0. c \j) --.3
0 </) 0
Ol c J: <D
c (I) Q. "- 0>
'c (I) -~ YJ. ~ '-- <11
~ 0..
c 0> ~ ---J
rn "0 ;j
Q. c Q ~
~ rn
~ </) ~ 'V ...
rn (I) d
(I)
(I) ~ ~ ------" '---
0:: ~
'" b ~
-'" c
rn f!! 0
0 :::l 13
10 0
..c :::l
>, ~
~ ~
0 .c '"
0:: '" (I)
:::l "0
>, ~
.0 0> is '-----
(I) c :E '~ -L
~ 'C rn
'r;; :::l ~ ~ ,-/) :s>
"0 ~ ~
'" '0 \.j ~ NO ~
-'" ~ .
~ c r---,J ("..
0 rn rn
S c.o '5 - \0
g Ol (I) 8
>,0. ~
.0 rn '" <5 (
C:::l 3: <D. c --tS> 1 .~
00.. -Cc.o 0> -...j
.- "0 .S<' Ol </) .~ ~~ \... " ~ ;V
- C I>-Q).:E -\; -:::-,
.- rn y "-
- cC'OuC1) s:
Q)= o3:c= "0 ~. '"
c..~ </)-C(I)'O Q)~ ~ >
c .S<':-Q <D ~ &;
~ Io....Itn(f.)
:::l <D rn ~
U -+r'''''O'L....(1)
~ eo>I...-
"0 Ol rn .~ g '"
0 CQ)"Oc- E (l
.- :::J C (I) '" ..:t.
(I) (J)c:~""'O <f) Z
-C :::l (I) 0 0 ~
- c > l... 0 :::J
4- ~<(:S-EC:
0
- 3: (I) </) 0 Cll
C C I.... ...0 I-
<D Q)=.g.c~
E E E en .21 t5
0. <D rn (I) (I) (I)
.2 {/):::::I:::JCI,....
Q) c en c co c: "'0
>oo..O>Oc
(1) (j) (,) >>_ ('C
"U Cll:E.'d-e al=
'"O~rn~Q)a.ro
cD 'L.... C'O a.. ..-
UJO).....~oE~
o c (/) I.... ._
o.'~ :::l -g 0. (I) rn
o 0 C (/J...... >:.;:;
0.- '"0 co 0:;:; c .
- L.- ro ('l)
a>..Ec:o~~OJ......
....c (1) N 0 0 G) 0
-.c:!P.C-lZIl. r~ <A
(I)~ - 'c-, ~. "" "'"
</) ~ ,'\-
0,.2 r-\ ,.,..
0. ;4- ,'\-
\ n.~
ON
~ =It
(I) ,
S~
.
<ll
<fl
co
o
0>
c
'c
c
""
!2::-
~
Cii
<ll
c::
<fl
-""
""
o
U)
~
""
0.
<fl
C
Ql
~
0>
"0
c
""
<fl
<ll
<ll
....
-
'0
c
~ 0
:::J t5
o :=J
--<: ....
~
--<: <fl
<fl <ll
2 "0
0> C5
c !E
'C
:=J ~
"0 ~
>. -g
"" ""
(0 '0 Ql
OlQl u
>. 0. '0
ro ~ s::
3: _ _
--<:(0 0>
.2' m r./) C
J: >. Ql :E
ccouc>
o'i:c=
<fl..t:Ql"O
c .2':2 Ql
\- I (I) Cf)
:=J Ql ""
-+ru\-Q)
:Jt:cnL.....
0> en .s g
cQ)'l:J~
"Ci) :J c: "'0 (1)
:=J C :=J 0 <fl
Ql 0 :=J
c>,-o
Q)~::;-Ec
-5Ql<flO""
>c"-..Q'-
rn -- 0 ..r: ::::J
CE\4-Ol$
"- - (/) 'm (f)
Ql <U Ql Ql
OU:i~I:JCl.....
QlC""cCiic"O
>Oo.O>Oc
.g;gj.~U>'O""
Ql~""-e",,=
""0 L... ro .... (1) 0.. en
~o>.)::;~g-E~
o c: r/') 1-... ._
0.'3 :=J al 0. Ql ""
000(/),+->:..;::
~-"'Ocoo:;:;c
lo..L.o ..... ('Ij Q)
Q)'+-~~g;O}o
--<:Ql""UOzQln
~...c:"T""C:--, J...L.,.
O)+-'...L..._
<fl ....
O~
0.
o.~
. o~
Ql ,
s~
Cii
>.
o
c::
>.
.D
Ql
.....
'(ii
<fl
-""
....
o
S
.~
:0
C :=J
0..
-~
Q)=
a.~
>.
~
<3
"0
o
Ql
--<:
.....
.....
o
.....
c
Ql
E
0.
~
~~~
:>. ~ \", ~
U '::::
::J, Ii'- ~
~V J
~
\
N
~
\f\
~
~
~
.~
~
'^
---SJ
C\
//I
//I
Ql
..
'0
'0
<I:
~
C\j
""
~
""
........
h
lU
L.l,
~
Ql
E
'"
z
--'
~
("'
;::::
rt
.~
::l
.....
ru
c
~
""
~
,1
"'
~
'~
CJ'...
~
fv-j
~
I
'-,
j
DD..
~
\'
W
0-.
N
""
'""
""'
""
,~
'"
"
\
I....,
'---"
'-fJ
I
--------
\--,
'-0
o
~
[V\
~
g
~
\'0.
I
-"
~
'"
)\:>
vl
M
(
'-"
M
'0
I
-----
Iv:>
---.s>
I
It;
~
~
c{
'(S
cL
IJj
--..J
~
Q
"'"
'"
-------
~
i-lJ
:::::"
\U
\--...
...
I\-->
...1:"
...s
[
'C
()
[Y\
"'\
-....,
I",
'V
')
'v.
"'"
'\)
'"
~
""
""
'"'l
~
,
l1
'V
l,
'-....,
I
--------
-"-'l
'---':;,
\
..........
VI
\:.1
'0
()"I
Ql
0>
co
0..
o
'-....,
\;:;
~
"
"
~
,
'"
~
---
-:;
~
c::'
~
,
;,-
I\'--
'1l
;t~
..-0 '"
........,
--..,
J--.--
~
/\J
.....,....,
-l
~
0JJ3Q
~ ~ IV
""-;>f!<
'---j--N:
c ~
~g0
:f: :;j.) s
~~1
""
\~
~
"%
~
'-S'
~ r-r ~ ~
If> "l'
?~~~.~'\
~~~~
~7
Q)
'"
'"
o
en
r:
r:
r:
'"
0...
~
.c
'"
Q)
0::
'"
-"
'"
o
'"
~
::l
o
.r:
.r:
'"
::l
~
r;;
Q)
o
'"
0.
'"
r:
Q)
Q)
~
0>
-0
r:
'"
'"
<1l
Q)
~
-
....
o
r:
o
'-P
o
::l
~
-
(()
Q)
-0
(j
:E
~
-
<1l
o
'0
r:
ns
c:
Q
:;:;
o
Q)
c:
o
..c:
0...
II>
II>
Q)
....
'0
'0
<(
'0
Q) 'Z
.... '"
c:
'':
Q)
E
ns
z
Q)
....
:I ..
....
ns
c:
lI)
:;t
Q
G'h..
,
ex,
'n
\()
~
-:~
llJ ~;-
'.'-
-:-:.
~
II ~
C} ~
lU
~
IJ
t\1
N)
'--..:
\D
-'
l.u
!:.!.
~
.:)
r:t
'Q
~ '->->
l'l\
~~
\G,
-..:\
"1'\
''l
,
----...
\,
lJJ
~
~
...g
'"
r-/I
.j
'--
1.1\
-.Sl
"V
a
\..
c.:c.
~
9-)
'-'-:..~
-">
G
.>
i5
I)
~
'i;
o
~
\.
Il
.;}
"i-
~
"\
'(
"
~
'1
.S[)
'7
"'t
'li
'Y
~-j
VA
\.
~ "j
:::S:'q
1\
'/ \f~
,\ -.,
;-
r\
fh
--.J
\'-.-
c.",
l"\
'--'
G'1
.~
"
\l-'
\Jj
M
~
\.0
...5i
l'I"
~
l5'
....s>
-
+---
<:.)
A
,~ l
7 ;J
4~
4~
-~
f'I\'t:fr
('('\ fi)
':j-' ."
('\)
----...
,
'-
f$;
----...
J
,
is
\()
"\
'>->
~
J
"
J
"
,
--iJ
i
r-
>'
~
~
i
.;J
'jJ
v
~
<J
j
\/J
<J
5
<J
'"
>.
o
0::
>.
.0
Q) 0>
_ r:
-if.> "C
::l
~ -0
~ >'-0
o r:
S CD'~ '"
.2 Cl> ~
.0 >.0.
'" '"
C::l 3:Q)
00... ,c -
.- -0 .Ql ~ g
:: C I >. '" ._
~'" c",Q)E
.... .,.00>
Q. '" 0.,. r: ._
'cQ)-
I '" 0>-0-0
~ ~ I '00 ~
o -+r"'C~co
"0 ::::Ico>~
0)C"CSC0
o C Q) OM .e::
Q) 'OO::J C ---
.r:. ::JC:J"UQ)
-- ,-<Door./J
-- "->1-0:::1
o ~<(:J.!:-
C ~Q)U)o~
Q) CL..ol....
E ({)=O.r:::l
D- E E :; ,2> 2
o Q) '" Q) Q) '"
Q)~1iiI::lr:~
>oo....ccucu
Q) (() 0 0 > 0 r:
"0 CU._ u >. -- co
-0 Q) tt:: .- t 0
<1l~",tt::Q)"'=
fJ'JO)~~o..a.19
OC",-oEQ)
0.."S; :::J '"'0 I- .- l0-
a> Q)Cl.Q.)-
~ 0 0 '" '+- > .~
c.. = ""D 0 -_ __
oLm ........c
Q)-roa>ooroQ.)
....t::Q)NL(f)O>_
-- ('000<1>0
Q)=Ir:--lZo...
'" ~
00
0..... I
o.~
ON
~
Q) ,
3;::2
......
~
-
~
'C
~
S--
L
.~
.---
--->.
'r-
-Q
\}...
I
~
I
\"
~
l;
.~
~
'LI
"
~
"-
'Z'
"
"-i)
'"
'"
\:
\)
\.J)
~
c--
.~
~
(J
"i
.....
(>..
\
"r.,
~
-....u
I
"'--
\",
"-l)
'G
~
~
'"
'"
"-"
I
5~
l
tC(j
') \
.~
~
s:
~
C
~
'i
'--"
'"
........
'h
v-
'>--
'S-
,~
~
~
~
t"(
'",
\
c;
'-"
'y
J
e
'w
.::::
"
~
~
~
":V
'-,
~.....
G
!'I\
-
~
~
~
~
~
't
~
~
-(
~
~
Q
Q Q
- ~
.
~I
....
o
'01
Q)
0>
'"
0...
.
.
OJ
C
'C
:::J
'D
~
<'ll
g5 '13
<Il
>. Cl.
<II <J)
3 <Il
..c: -
OJ <0 -
._ Cl) OJ
I >. <J) .!:
ccotDE
03()OJ
c ._
t/)..!::11)-
c .!2>"'O 'D
~ I .- Q)
() :::J <J) C/)
"'i'"'C~l1J
"'0 :::J: c:: 0) Q)
o OJ<'llco
Q) .!: <Il '6 .!:
w:Jc-
-f; :JC~""'Ot1)
'+- c~oor.n
o <Il<(t:O::l
.... ..c ::l ..c -
c 3 <Il <J) 0 C
(l) C '- ...... co
E UJ'-o~lo.....
Cl. cE.......c::::J
~ OJ <II
o .. Q) en ~ 'm +-"
-(/)- \U....cn
<Ilc~I:::JC:<Il
>o'u - ~
Q) Q..crnc
""O(lJoo>oTI
rn ._ t.) >. c
"0 Q) ::t= .- ....... 1:5 Ct)
Q)\-mt"-ro-
en 0> "- co ~ .-
oc+-"l-o.Q..g
Cl.'- C/) - 0 E <Il
o 3:: ::) "0 '- .- l.....
Io-oomQ.Q)-
a. = -0 (/) - >.~
a "-roO:';:;-
ID-.rn(1) roC:
..c"''l.N,-~.......Q)
_....cuo"'~o...J)-
<Il..c: I c 0 <Il 0
rJ>::: _--,Zo...
00
Cl...... I I I I I
. ~~
<Il .
S~
e<ll
<J)
<ll
()
OJ
C
'c
c:
<'ll
Q.
~
.c
(ij
<Il
0::
<J)
-'"
<II
o
<II
>.
o
0::
>.
.0
<Il
-
'(j)
<J)
-'"
~
o
S
.2
.0
.~
_<II
Q)=
a.. <II
I
~
<J)
~
:::J
o
..c:
..c:
<J)
:::J
~
r;;
<Il
()
<ll
Cl.
<J)
c:
<Il
I::
OJ
"'0
c:
ro
<J)
<Il
<Il
~
-
.....
o
c
o
:;:::
()
:::J
~
-
<J)
<Il
"'0
U
:E
<II
~
-
'D
C
ro
Q)
.2
o
c:
/u ~.; ;!.
y .j-
( \~
V>
I ~ it)
<U ....9 (i' 'il
c rfJ () ~
0 -" \b R
"" f l'.i '1 ~
~- ~ ,
0 \
\1\ r.-.,
Q) c:; j::; ~~ ~ !'\ ~
C \ ~
0 \ (1)
..r: ~ ~ \::::; 'Z , ~
Q.. .v., IJ;
"0 ~ ""-- ~
~ .....
0
, .QI
,~ ,~ ~ >.. ~
~ ~ <Il
'----" OJ
t <II
'---~ ') Cl..
? .(J J ~
S; ~ ~ '" ~
III '-- '~ -"S ':;: I~
III <:1 -----~ ' ~
Ql
... : ~ ::s '~ ~ <:
."
." >~ <0
<( ~ ------0 -' ~
~ ~1
r(\ ~ ~
if t:: ':::1-.
r0 ~ --5- ::: ~
.~ SQ ~ 1'1\
~ ....... "-..: .",
......
q \:
J ':-::! ~ ~
'::::
-----/ <;- ~
.,,~ \\ ;::;- <0
~d5 ~ I.'" <
Jl ~ ) C
c ~
u., .~ \<;J, ;:$
'-D ~
Q) "\ ~ ~ -'\.\
E J~ p- " '\i.
<U
Z \l::: -- .....
<;z:- ~ ~ l \'
~ . ~
4 < cJ
~ ~
C
rn
:;I:
N
"
,..,
<l
fi)
m
o
(\l
C.
en
C
m
m
~
0>
"0
C
m
en
<I>
<I>
~
~
....
o
en <:
~ 0
::;:5 :t=:
'" 0 0
>> ~ :>
o L';:;
rr: en en
>> :> <I>
..Q ~"O
m OJ 0
:!::: C \t=
r./) 'C Il+-
(/) ~ ~
-'" ~ ~
o L--g
~ <O'~ '"
o Ol~ <I>
..Q >>c. g
t::> ",en 0
00... 1<1>, <:
.- "0 OJ <0 OJ
.... C 0- 0'> C
..'" I>>"'+;
Q)= cCOQ)..c
> 0 OJ
0..'" o>c._
I ~<I>-
'" OJ "0
>. E.-:-2 Q)
~ ~I(/)cn
() "'I''''O~rn
32 ~crn~
{J)rnc:u
o .~ <I> '6 .~
cD en:J c ---
~ :>c:>"O<I>
.... c mOO f/)
15 Q)~t:O:J
....... ..c.........:J..I::.-
t:: ~ Q) (I) 0 ~
Q) CL.....oL...
E '" = 0 -
cE....~~
a. l.- r./)O)Cll
o - - Q) m C1) Ow Ui
Q)~~I:>cQ)
~ ro _ l.....
ii)Oc.C(\lc"O
""'Ocn()o>oc
~ if: .2 i? 1:5 '"
~~mtl:: m=
(/'J O)~ ~ 2. a..~
o.~ '" ~ 0 E Q)
a. 3: ::s -0 ~ .- L...
eoomc.m(ij
n..-""Ct/)'+->.-
oL...('GO~c
Q),,-C'O(])(/)co(])
...c 6't\ N 1-0 '" OJ~
-~C'C5 oQ)Q
m:EIE.....JZo...
'" ~
00
c..... I
c.~
ON
~
Q) ,
~~
m
en
m
o
Ol
C
'r:
<:
.!ll
e:..
C
m
Q)
rr:
'"
-'"
'"
o
<II
C
o
..
rJ
1,\\
l"
h
(v
J
'0-
I),
"'"
1
JJ .-.......',.
1\.1 ~'"
~~ ....n
\
o
Q)
c:
o
~
Q.
(
q
'6,
J
-\):
UJ
UJ
Q)
....
:g-=::;
<;(
S
"c;
~
_!>
V>
f'"
-~
~ ..-".-
"{\
<..J
C$':
~
s;
'1;
~
J..
'J2
'---'
':::<}
s J c
c: \]
i ~ (
..~
,
s
~
<;:-
'C
~
"'-,
~
""I
-.l-
l.l\
'---D
"-
\
"'-
\i-
'-S
I
--
In
~
,,-
'"
<t
;,
~
;y
S
C
'-!
--."
<;...
~-
'-'('.
00
r{\
I:'--.
t..t)
\Yj
--:r-
{J
J
c:
'<J
\..,
-.."
.::::;
...::~
p.
, \!,
'<!
~
4J
,.
~
~
:1
rI--
r--- /'q
~ ."
~
\\,
lY)
-,-..
i
J3
, \
c\--
~ ~";:,
""
;>
<'
i;J
=-6
~
: 'i
~~.
( ~ '~f'
~ ~ _~' {
~ ,-
7- _
,<, .
(J q ~..,
"1 i
.. -~~
"
14
.) .
1(
_.-~ ~
r" r'
(;
\
~
~
~-
'-,tJ
..~
~
~
-
N
It
1\
'--
,
N\
J
\
\))
)
3
'5
1
~
$t c![
Iv, riJ
........ J
r0
'-.
\-'"
}7
<?
~
-.ff
5
.
~
f
Ij)
'"
-....!)
iP
--D
\d
....
o
::::1
~
Q)
0>
ro
0...
..,J
9
e
Ql
(f)
ro
o
0>
C
'c
c
ro
0..
~
>-
-
m
Ql
0:::
(f)
..:.:
ro
o
(j)
~
ro
a.
(f)
c
Q)
ill
~
m
-0
c
ro
(f)
ill
Ql
~
-
'-
o
c
o
+:;
o
:J
~
-
fJ)
Ql
-0
(5
if:
ro
~
-
(f)
~
:J
ro 0
>- .c
o .c
0::: (f)
>- 0:
.0 m
ill c
..... 'c
"(i5 ::J
(f) -0
-t: >. u
c
o rn m
S <D'o
en Q) ill
g >-0. 0
.0 ro (f) '0
.co 6: 1 Ql. c.
0> <D m
.;::; -g 'I- en (f).S
~ co >. q) 1:
Q) = :5 ~ g .Ql
a..~ (f).c Ql-o
C .Ql:!2 Ql
>- ~IUJ(f)
+-' ~ <1) co
(3 -"'''U''--Q)
::J C rn "--
32 en m .!: g
o C ill -0 ._
Ql '-::1 C - Ql
cnc::s-o
.s::.. ::s tt> 0 en
-+-' c > e 0 ::I
'-0 Q,).A'''--.c....
..c'""'4..::J\,...c
- >illUJoro
c ;>C'-..QI.-
Ql (f)=0.c:J
E CE'-mro
0.. '- en "iD (;)
0"2IroQlCQ)
- (/'J +-' ::J "--
G.>crocrocu
>illOc..o>Oc
(j) (,) +-' m
-oro""o~o
"0 ~ '1u l:E Q; ro _Cij
ill ~ ro 0.0._
(/)O1__\... Em
oCt/) ..... e ._ l-
8-30 5 al .;:- g; .~
"-- "U (/) 0 .- .......
0..= "-- rn (;j c
Q)..g ro (l) cn 0>$
-CQlNt5(f) I!) 0
-.c roc ozo..
Q.)....I_--1
UJ ~
001
0.'-
n.~
o~
ill '
s~
.
::::-
'"
c
o
i~
I~
Q)
c
o
.c
0..
ffI
ffI
Q)
..
'1;1
'1;1
0(
~
No
~ ';:'-
~~
\, '~
::::: .,~
~-..:.
----.:::,
";
~
l...
~
\f\
\S-
- ~
V)
-........
-C /u
~ -........
0- 0----
...:. lV\
i'" -...S)
'u.
-
""
'--'
Ie
o
J
\:.1,
~
":t
11..1
.Q
t",
-
L
P
~
\};
.-S;,
~
'--...
'~
I
\,---
tf\
I
--------
""
~.
';;t,
-~
~
~
ct
:s
()-
"'^
.'
v, ~
~ \J\
:'It. j'~ ~
\.:.. ~-~
:u V1
.-
Q) t.lc -'-- ~
....
c:
i~ ~ / .~
D j
Q) >- ~'
E .-.1
'" u, ~
z '! ~ ~
"
\c.\ J<~ .
'\>>.
\.'l
J--
"
~
i ~ ~~-
~J~~'
\.'0 I COV-":~ ,
*
'+
~
\ .~
AI
~
--
o
~I
Ql
rn
ro
0..
Q)
(/)
ro
o
OJ
c
'c
c
ro
Q..
~
---
(/)
Q)
Q
ro
a.
(/)
c
Q)
Q)
~
OJ
"0
C
ro
(/)
Q)
<1l
L
-
>.
"='
ro
(I)
0::
(/)
-"
ro
o
'0
(/) c
5 0
ro 0 1:5
>. ..c ::>
o L
rv' ..c-
u... (/) (/)
>. ::> Q)
..0 L"O
Q) OJ Q
.~ .~ ~
::> ro
~ "O.b
o ..c "0
> ro c
> <0 .- ro
.~ Q) al Q)
..0 >. a. .~
...::> ro (/) 0
"'Q.. ~Q) c
.2"0 -6, <0 OJ
..... c .- Q) c
;ro I>>CJ):.;::;
,... cro(])..c
"" = 0 ~ ~ .2'
Q.~ (/)..cQ)-
>. c 0)"0 ""0
~ ~ I"(j) ~
o ~"'O~ro
'U ::JcO)~
o OJroCQ
.~ Q) '6 .~
Q) w:Jc'-'
....c ::JC::J"'OQ)
.... cQ)oom
'0 <D~l::o::J
..... ....c........::J..c-
C ~ Q)'(/) 0 C
<l) c'--..Qco
E (/):.: O..c 5
0.. E E :; (J) JB
o .. Q) ro <1l 'Qi (/)
<1l(/)~I::>c<1l
C m _ '--
iDoa.croc"O
"0 (/) Q 0 > 0 C
co: .- u >-......... co
"0 (I) ~ .- t Q
Q)Lro~Q)ro=
r.n O)~ ~ Q. 0..2
o.~ (/) - 0 E <1l
0.. 3: :::J"U '-- .- '--
eo 0 Q)o..Q)(O
0... - "0 Cf) "- > .-
o '--rn O:;:'c
m.....roa>cn(UQ)
....cIDN~(I)O)_
...........ccu.....o<DO
W.........I'=--1ZQ.
(/) L
00
a.'+- I
a.~
ON
~
Q) ,
>~
G>
c:
o
.r:
0..
"
"-
"."'1~-r\
,~ -----.
~;, :---
~ ~1:
~
II) ~
II) '"
~ "'.:-
"0---'
"0
~
-----."
-"--Ie
'::9
s:
p
'Q
'--
'"
'\
'"
'I
~
J
~
~
~'"
-::t-
'-
~
"'"
:i--
)-
I'
"
~ l\)
-::s
~>lJ
Uj~
G> ~
E
III
Z
'I
'0;
~
~~
~,~,
rn
~
Qj
t\
'-<
s
0J
,
~
N
'---
I~.~~
~
~
~
,'>)
V
""
~
~
(
"-
'\.
t
~
iJ-
\)0
-----.
,
'0
\0
---0
'-->,
"\
.~
:::"
2
'W-
Q
i'f.
Q
~
'"
~
..s
\~
'J
()
P-~
'Y
~---
..:0
-l
01_ C
CZ:*
u
.)
\lj
'S'-
'"
Q
"" ~
o
.~
-,,2\)
~
\
f:'
to
-~
L \~
t) \..)
$ ~
~
4I -----:.._.
~
h
"r
'\
'-
------..
,.----0>
, ..~
"" ,:'J
~
j
.-'
.r-
~
"'"
~
N
~
\i0
~
----
.,.
'"
N
(1\
\5 ~.
~/
.,
\"-;
~.
..J
Q
.~
~
<~
. ~ ~
\,~'\ '
\'.<
.~
52
)
'-.9
0J
~
"'--...,-'"
~
(J----
'G
~
--'-
C'-
e
~
'+-
o
~
Q)
OJ
ro
Q..
.
.
ew -------
<fJ en
<<l W
0 U
<<l 0
Ol 0.
.S en Gl
C C c:
C W 0
<<l W .s:;
CL ~ 0-
Ol
~
>, "0
"=' c ~I
<<l <<l
W <fJ
0:: w
w ~ -
(/) ~ 0
--"" ~
<<l - 'is ~ ~
0 0 ~
<fJ C ~
~ i
<<l :::J 0 \) <~~ W
>, 0 "" OJ
0 .c U III -~ (Il
0:: :::J III ~'c CL
.c ~ .~
(/) ~ Gl
>, (/) ...
.a :::J W "0
~ "0 ~ U,)
<D OJ "0 '..........~
..", C U- ~ .....:> ~~
(/) .;:: :j=:
en :::J --< \;::.
--"" "0 (Il ~
~ ~
~ >, ~
"D
<0 (Il c
.2 CD '<3 (Il ~
w <Ii
.a >,0. ~
I:: :::J (Il (/) .2
,~ :;: W 0
.c c
Ol cD -
._ CD OJ
Q) (Il J: >, <fJ .~
Q.(Il croQ)+-'
I O:;:U.c .
f/) ~ c.~ ~ '-1
.~ c OJ W
'- "_ ""0 -0 "0
0 :::J J: 'en m )".
-+J-oQ)tn $ ~ ..<;\
"0 :::J ~ <<l c:
0 en ~. 0> ~ 'C ~
c c U
W '_ w '6 c
.c (j):::J .-
~ ::JCC--- Gl
- a5~eg~ E
0 III '\::
~ .c ~ :::J Z
C :;: :::J .c ""'- C,
W Q.)(I)QC CJ 'c
E en .~ "'- ...n co <:J ,
a. EE..E..c~ s;;: ~ r
o..m(1l(/).Q)(Il i.lI
WW::::IClla.>--
>15(1l :::JC~ ~
(])C/)Q.CroC'-
"D(IlUO>O"O
""CQ)t0 >.........c
Q)'-ro::EtUCO
~ 0>"::- (U OJ ro:-=
c ,-0..0.<13
0....- (/J...... 0 E..... Gl
o 3: ::J "'0 ,-. a.>
L-OOQ}a.-'- ...
0...= "'0 CD- :J
o CI)'+->ctJ ...
a>......romO:;::;:; l'lI
:5{])N~C/)<tIC: c:
Q).s::=.couC/)0>2
(/)+-'ICOIDO Vl
00 _-1Za..
0.- I
o.~
eON
w";'
s~ '(y
:;j: ,..,.-
'" ""
~ -..-
" ~
'"
'"
..s
c
~ 0
Q) '" +> .
'" Q)
ttl 0 0
U ttl
a. Cl>
0> '" C
C C 0
'c (!) ..c ~I
C Q) c..
ttl ~ ,.
0>
CL '0 -
~ 0
.c C ~I
ttl
ro '"
&! Q)
Q) ~ t 11)
~ <J 0>
~ -
- X 1-' ttl
ttl 0 ? 1 CL
0 '" C CJ cB --I..:-- IJ ~
~ 0 -,j ''1 "-.l
::> ti ~
ttl 0 " , 1}
>. II) >- .~ -
0 ..c ::> fI) ~ .IJ j >
0::: ..c ~ Cl> C S
- ... ~ ~
'" '" '0 -:.J ~ -:::;
>. ::l 11) "0 ----v ,.,. ~ I.,
.0 '- '0 ~
11) 0> <( )., <
- C 0 >- ..I.:
'(i; .;:: lE
'" ::J ~
-c '0 - i\
0 >. '0 V\ '\.j 4;
5; ttl C I"')
CD .- ttl ""' ~
.2 0)0 M g: -- C- l' r-
11) Q)
2i >.0. .2 ::r- .~ T" ::r-- -:r-
s::: ::l ttl '" 0 j- -:;--
~ Q) T -::r
OCL ..c - C
.- '0 0> CD - ;iJ
~c ._ 0) 0>
- ttl :r: >. "'.S ~ .
Q)= c::cocv:E
o.ttl 0~00l
C._
I f,/J .s::::. Q)- r
.~ cO>'U'O <.I
~ I -(jj ~ j
0 "'7'u~ro ~"-l
:!;! :::JcQ)~
0 O)CU_cU
Q) .S Q):.o.s
(/)::Jc-'"
..c ::JC::>'OQ)
-
- c ~ 00'"
0 clJ<(t:O::l (I)
- .r. ::J...c....... \J
c ~ Q) '" (; C 11i
Q) c'-..ctu \ ~
E en -- 0 10-
cE-..c::> --1
a. '- 0> ro F
0.. <1.l'(QCI)"Qio+J
Gl~~:r:~c~
>0 - '-
Q) o.CttlC-o
'Ol{joo>oc
-- u .>.-
u ~ ll= .- 'C 0 ttl
Q) ttlll=Q)ttl=
fJ) O>l:; en a.. Cl. m Ql
o.~(/).l:;oE<D ...
g-?:: :::J -0 '- .~ 10- ::l
'-00 Glo.Glttl ....
0.== "'0 U) a > -- III
o '- ro -- - c
Q)'-('OQ)(/)<Oc
....cQ)N"-I/)O)(l) II)
- en 0 -+-'
m..c:r:coGlO
VJ-: _--lZQ..
00
0.-
o.~
ON
~
Q) ,
5;~ :u: \... '->. M- ~'>- .
- ti
~ ... -.;,. ....... dl -+
~ .v--
. City Council Meeting
Attachment 6A - 4
.
.
July 11,2005
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - JULY 6, 2005
4
.
A.
PLANNING CASE 05-12: ROYAL OAKS REALTY, 1000 COUNTY ROAD E
WEST, SHOREVIEW, MN; MASTER AND FINAL PUD AND PRELIMINARY
PLAT FOR OLD CITY HALL AND PUBLIC WORKS SITE (1440-1450
HIGHWAY 96)
Mr. Hellegers stated applicant was requesting a Master and Final POD and Preliminary
Plat for the redevelopment of the old City Hall/Public Works property as a 7 building, 30
unit, office condominium complex. Staffrecommended approval ofthe Master and Final
Planned Unit and Preliminary Plat subject to the following conditions:
.
1. Revised Final Plans. The applicant shall submit revised plans, responsive to the
comments from the Plan Review Comments contained in City Planning File #05-12
for review and approval by the City Planner, City Engineer, and City Building
Official, prior to the issuance of building permits.
2. Development Timeline. The applicant's timeline for development shall be as follows:
Phase 1: Summer 2005 - The developer may begin grading, installing
utilities, and construction of storm water improvements. It is expected that
construction on 3 buildings/16 units (presumably units 15-30), will also begin
at this time. The 3 buildings/16 units are expected to be ready for occupancy
by the spring of2006.
Phase 2: Summer - 2006 - The developer expects to begin construction on
the remaining 4 buildings/14 units (presumably 1-14) with expected
occupancy of these units by the spring of 2007.
Extensions beyond 2007 shall require application to the City Council for review and
approval. At the time of application for extension, the City Council may include such
conditions of approval as they determine necessary for compliance with City Code.
3. Number of Businesses in a Unit. 30 office condominium uses have been proposed for
development on individual lots. Only one business shall be permitted to occupy any
one lot within the development.
4. Retail Uses. Retail uses shall not be allowed to occupy any of the units in the
proposed development, except for incidental or accessory sales.
5. Restaurant Uses. Restaurant uses shall not be allowed to occupy any of the units in
the proposed development.
6. Residential Uses. Residential uses shall not be allowed to occupy any of the units in
the proposed development.
7. Landscaping Plans. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan for review
and approval by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. The
revised landscape plan shall include a mixture of coniferous and deciduous trees
along the west buffer yard of the development. The mixture of landscaping shall
adequately screen the development from the residential properties to the west.
8. Tree Preservation. The applicant and their contractors shall work with the City
Planner and City Forester to save as many existing, healthy, and well placed trees as
possible in the areas designated as landscape space.
9. Signage. One freestanding monument sign at the Highway 96 entrance shall serve for
the development. Wall signage within the development shall include 30 square feet
for each unit shall be permitted in accordance with the City's Sign ordinance. Each
unit shall have 30 square feet including the 1 square foot address and name plaque
adjacent to the main entry for the unit. The 30 square feet of sign age may be on the
side of the building or the front but not on the rear of the building. The unit signage
of 30 square feet may be illuminated by small decorative lighting fixtures which
.
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - JULY 6, 2005
comply with the City's lighting standards. The building housing units 26-30 shall be
permitted to have one 60 square foot, internally illuminated sign which faces
Highway 96 to the north. This building shall be limited to 30 square feet on either the
west or south sides of the building, so that the total building signage would not
exceed 90 square feet.
10. Screening of Mechanical Operating Equipment. All mechanical operating equipment
shall be screened to meet City regulations.
11. Decorative Fencing to Surround the Pond. Decorative painted fencing (like painted
wrought iron fencing) shall be erected around the pond at the northeast corner of the
property to protect pedestrians from falling into the pond.
12. Execution of a POD Permit. Execution of a PUD Permit drafted by the City Attorney
and approved by the City Council prior to the issuance of a Building Permit.
13. Park Dedication. Satisfaction of the park dedication requirements as approved by the
City Council in the amount of $40,000.00.
14. Final Plat. The applicant shall submit an application for a Final Plat within six (6)
months following City Council approval of the POD and Preliminary Plat.
15. Necessarv Approvals from Other Agencies. The applicant shall obtain all necessary
permits from the Rice Creek Watershed District and Ramsey County.
Commissioner Modesette asked if there had been any new information with respect to the
turn radius for the entry drive. Mr. Hellegers replied there might be a little bit of
additional space to work with, but it would not be 50-feet of additional space as
recommended. He noted moving the pole was not something that had been discussed.
Commissioner Modesette asked if they had discussed with the developer the location of
the windows on the south side. Mr. Hellegers responded he had not spoken with the
developer regarding this and he requested the developer answer this question.
Chair Sand asked if the entire site was zoned neighborhood business now. Mr. Hellegers
replied it was approved as neighborhood business at the June meeting.
Chair Sand stated the City had received several emails and other correspondence from
residents, including a memorandum from Gale E. Van Buskirk at 1390 Arden View
Drive, attaching a petition signed by 154 citizens opposing this project.
Commissioner Thompson asked if there had been a new landscape plan submitted. Mr.
Hellegers replied they had not received a landscape plan at this time, but one would be
required before this would get final approval.
Chair Sand invited anyone for or against the vanance to come forward and make
comment.
5,
.
.
Elwood F. Caldwell, 1451 Arden View Drive, stated he was commenting on behalf of the
Board of Directors of Arden Hills North Homes Association. He presented his written
comments: "This is in response to the eight-page memorandum dated July 6 containing
the staff recommendations plus various attachments, to both of which we will refer, but .
more particularly to the 16 specific conditions for approval on pages 6 ar.d 7.
No. 1 stated in part that "The applicant shall submit revised plans, responsive to
comments from the Plan Review Comments contained in City Planning File #05-12..."
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - JULY 6, 2005
6
.
[emphasis added]. Since we endorse those comments unequivocally, we believe that the
revised final plans should comply with rather than be responsive to them. "Responsive"
according to the dictionary means "making answer or reply" or simply "answering."
Nos. 2-8 are conditions on which we have no comment or with which we agree.
No. 9 deals with signagc. Notwithstanding the 30 square foot maximum unit wall
signage allowed by ordinance in the NB district, we previously recommended a
maximum of 6 square feet, which has been ignored. Signage in a very similar Royal
Oaks development in Lakeville, of which you have seen color photographs, currently
appears to fall within that limit. In any event, unit wall signage should be limited to not
over 15 square feet, which we understand units in the Lakeville development may be
permitted.
We also object strongly to the 60 square foot internally illuminated sign proposed to be
allowed on the north wall of building 26-30 that would be visible over the holding pond
from Highway 96. In our view it would detract substantially from the "townhome"
appearance of the development.
.
Nos. 10-15 are conditions which we previously recommended and which received zero
acknowledgment or attention in the July 6 staff recommendations. It deals with the
problematic Hmnline AvenueIKarth Lake Circle/Site Access intersection. At the very
least, the plat should be revised to show larger than standard radii (50-foot recommended)
on the northwest and southwest corners of that intersection as recommended by the traffic
study (on page 14 of Attachment 4b-3 to the June 1 staff recommendations) and
concurred in by the Rmnsey County traffic engineer Dan Soler as item 4 in his
memorandum of May 20, 2005 (Attachment 4a-4 to the June 6 staff recommendations).
If the project is approved, the additional condition should require construction of the radii
at that intersection in the initial phase of development.
In summary, we continue to obiect to this proiect, but ask that if vou recommend
approval to the Citv Council, at the verv least vou retain or strengthen the present staff
conditions 2-8 and 10-15. and in addition:
1) In condition No.1, require compliance with and not merely responsive to the many
comments from the Plan Review Comments section of the staff report;
2) In condition No.9, limit unit wall signage to not over 15 square feet and preferably
not over six square feet, and delete permission for any sign on the north wall of units
25-30;
3) Add a condition No. 16 requiring that the recommended 50-foot radii at Hmnline
Avenue be shown on the plat and be constructed in the initial phase of construction of
the development."
.
Commissioner McClung stated in order to construct a 50-foot radii would require some
easement from the townhome association. He asked if the townhome association had
discussed this.
Dave Ehresman, 1481 Arden View Drive, President of Arden Hills Townhomes North,
stated they did not favor the lighted, illuminated sign on the building. With respect to the
50-foot radius curve he offered the townhome association was willing to negotiate an
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - JULY 6, 2005
7.
easement at no cost to the developer to allow a 50-foot radius to be incorporated into the
development.
.
Commissioner Larson asked if they would need to obtain right-of-way from the daycare
also. Mr. Hellegers responded the Developer would need to work with Excel to move the
pole and there might be a need to also obtain an easement from the daycare.
Mr. Clark stated the other question they needed to discuss was that the traffic engineer
study had discussed a 50-foot radius and this did not conform with other street
intersections in the City.
Mr. Brown stated a normal intersection had a 25-30 foot radius and he was not sure
where the 50-foot recommendation cmne from and they did not anticipate large truck
traffic. He recommended as large of a radius as possible, but 50 feet appeared to be
excessive and 25-30 would be more appropriate.
Commissioner Larson asked if this would stand out as being dissimilar to other streets
that accessed Hmnline. Mr. Brown replied it would.
Dan Soler, Traffic Engineer Ramsey County Public Works Department, stated originally
when he looked at the traffic study, he was not sure there was a number in it, but he
agreed there should be some type of a radius on that corner. He indicated there are only
two reasons why they would want a larger radius including a high number of semi-tractor .
trailers using the access and to ensure that when vehicles are turning they end up on the
correct side of the road. He recommended there be a reasonable radius, such as 25-30
feet. He noted there were no 50-foot radius on Hmnline and Highway 96.
Commissioner Zimmerman asked ifthe County had any guidelines with respect to radius.
Mr. Soler replied they did and the radius ranged from 25-50 feet depending upon the
factors, but he recommended a 25-30 foot radius for this development.
Chair Sand asked if there was adequate access on Highway 96 to stripe the highway for
the turn lane. Mr. Soler replied there was sufficient width for a turn lane and he
recommended striping and signing be put into place.
Chair Sand asked if there should be an acceleration lane for exiting vehicles. Mr. Soler
responded there was not such a lane anywhere else on Highway 96 and typically they did
not use acceleration lanes on Highway 96 or any other County roads.
Commissioner Modesette inquired about "U" turns. Mr. Soler stated "U" turns were not
an issue anywhere there were "U" turns at a protected signal. He acknowledged "U"
turns in some areas were a problem and in some areas they were not and it depended
upon the location.
Commissioner Zimmerman asked if there was any precedence in tJlere being a sign some
number of feet before the entrance/exit to the property that indicated that there was traffic .
entering from the right. Mr. Solder replied signage such as this might be helpfuL He
stated they could look at the sight lines to see if this made sense.
.
.
.
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - JULY 6, 2005
8
Chair Sand asked if there was anything that would prevent the driveway access to be laid
out at a different location on Highway 96. Mr. Soler replied the driveway could not be
too close to where the right turn lane began at Hamline.
Commissioner McClung noted the Hmnline turn lane during rush hour did back up
almost to this proposed driveway entrance.
Commissioner McClung stated there was an issue with traffic on southbound Hmnline
during morning rush hour.
Jim Hartsoe, President Townhouse Villages Homeowners Association South, 4430 Arden
View Court, stated the traffic on Hamline was a big problem, especially between 7-9 a.m.
He noted there was no light on Arden View Drive. He asked if people going north on
Hamline be able to turn left into the development. He did not believe the traffic
questions had been addressed well. He stated he had a concern about the number of
businesses being proposed on the property. He expressed concern with respect to
drainage. He stated the homeowners found it difficult getting and in out onto Hamline
Avenue and asked this be taken into consideration.
Kathy Sikano(?sp), Karth Lake Circle, expressed concern about the inability of people to
turn left onto Karth Lake Circle off of Hmnline during rush hour. She noted there was no
left turn lane to allow people to turn into Karth Lake Circle.
Diane Phillipi, 1442 Arden View Drive, expressed concern about the lanes merging
where the proposed driveway was going to be put.
Cindy Owen, 4490 Hamline, expressed concern about the traffic increase on Hamline.
She noted the traffic had grown immensely over the past years and she was concerned
about the safety of the residents on Hmnline Avenue.
Gail Van Buskirk, 1390 Arden View Drive, stated she had submitted a petition with 154
signatures in opposition to this development. She indicated a lot of citizens were
concerned about this. She stated she was concerned with the traffic study in that they
tried to use the current traffic and forecast future traffic, without addressing the increase
of traffic with Guidant's development. She indicated the study also did not address the
increased traffic onto all of the streets that exited onto Hamline Avenue. She noted no
environmental impact statement had been done, but with the water and drainage
concerns, she encouraged them to require an environmental assessment or impact
statement to make sure those issues were under controL She asked them to deny this
planning case.
Susie Severson, 1345 Arden View Drive, expressed concern about the police traffic on
Hamline Avenue and the safety of the children in the area.
Elwood Caldwell noted the traffic study had recommended a 50-foot radii and he
believed this intersection was like no other intersection in the City and needed that radii.
Terry Giel, 4534 Keithson Drive, stated making a "U" turn on Highway 96 was
problematic.
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - JULY 6, 2005
9,
Tony Tredal, 4521 Keithson Drive, stated she was opposed to this development. She .
noted their home had been built by Royal Oaks Realty and she had experienced many
problems with Royal Oaks Realty with them not complying with the City of Arden Hills
requirements and Rice Creek Watershed District requirement. She noted this developer
was not responsive and asked how the City could trust a company that had betrayed them
in the past.
Commissioner Thompson asked if the radius was 25-30 feet would it still be necessary to
move the utility pole. Mr. Hellegers replied staff would need to look at this.
Mr. Clark stated that more than likely the additional space for the radius would create the
need for the driveway to have additional space to the south, outside of the easement.
Commissioner Modesettc asked if there was anyway to put in a dedicated turn lane for
the driveway.
Commissioner McClung recommended amendments to the conditions and wanted to add
two additional recommendations. First, with respect to signage, his concern was the
variance for the signage. He stated they should allow a freestanding monument sign on
Highway 96 and it should comply with the sign restrictions. Wall signage should be
within accordance with the City's sign ordinance standards. He was opposed to a large
sign on the back of units 26-30 and recommended that language be struck from condition
number 9. He noted he would not be in support of a sign variance. He expressed concern
about the trail to the west in that it was only 10 feet from the back of units 1, 2 and 3. He
proposed repositioning the buildings to allow a 20-foot setback from where the building
ends to the trail. He believed there would be public safety concerns, as well as drainage
concerns. He recommend a larger than standard radii with a minimum of 30-feet and
allow the applicant to bring forth a proposal that the City would approve prior to the
issuance of a building permit.
.
Mr. Clark stated it was his understanding the PTRC was asked to look at this and he did
not believe they had made a recommendation to move the buildings, but their concern
was that the integrity of the trail be maintained.
Commissioner Larson asked if the trail way was protected from the drainage plans
submitted. Mr. Brown replied he did not remember that area being a concern, but this
would be something they would look at further and the drainage should not adversely
impact the trail.
Commissioner Thompson asked if they should recommend some type of lighting on the
trail for the safety of the people walking the trail. Chair Sand noted they needed to
balance the safety for the path users versus lighting issues for the homes by the trail.
Commissioner McClung stated that was the reason he wanted a larger area between the
buildings and the trail.
.
Mike Black, Royal Oaks Realty, stated they might have some room to make some
adjustments between the buildings to add an additional five feet for the trail.
kRDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - JULY 6, 2005
10
.
Commissioner McClung stated he would be willing to look at allowing some flexibility
to the required parking because this was strictly office use, which would give more space
to th(l trail, more green space, and a larger setback for the homes on Keithson Drive.
Chair Sand asked if they could put in some environmentally friendly lighting two or three
feet off of the ground along the path.
Commissioner Thompson asked if they could require them protecting the trail while
construction was happening.
.
Commissioner McClung moved, seconded by Commissioner Larson to recommend
approval of Planning Case No. 05-12: Royal Oaks Realty, 1000 County Road E West,
Shoreview, MN; Master and Pinal POD and Preliminary Plat for Old City Hall and
Public Works Site (1440-1450 Highway 96), subject to the conditions as noted in staffs
July 6, 2005 report and adding the following amendment/conditions: Condition 9 to read
- Signage: One freestanding monument sign at the Highway 96 entrance shall serve for
the development which shall conform to the City's Sign Ordinance restrictions. Wall
signage within the development shall include 30 square feet for each unit in accordance
with the City's Sign Ordinance. Signage shall be limited to the front of the building. 16.
Building Setback from City Trail: Units 1,2, and 3 ofthe proposed development shall be
set back at least 20 feet from the existing trail on the west side of the property. 17.
Hmnline Avenue Entrance: To facilitate movement in and out of the development, a
minimum 30-foot radii shall be built on the northwest and southwest comer of the
intersection. Revised entrance plans shall be submitted to the City Engineer and Rmnsey
County Engineer for approval prior to the issuance of the building permits. 18. During
construction of the development and post construction of the development, applicant shall
provide plans to the City Engineer that will show how impact the City trail on the west
side of the development shall be mitigated including a drainage plan to prevent erosion of
the trail.
Commissioner Bezdicek expressed concern with the 20-foot setback for the trail and
requested this be revised to a 15- foot setback.
Commissioner Bezdicek moved, seconded by Commissioner Thompson to amend
Condition 16 to require a l5-foot setback for the trail, instead of a 20-foot setback. The
motion carried (6-1) (Commissioner McClung opposed).
Chair Sand noted Condition 16 would read l5-feet instead of20-feet.
Commissioner Larson requested they amend Condition number 18 that the developer is to
provide low-level lighting for the trail behind the buildings subject to approval by the
City Planner. Commissioner McClung accepted the amendment.
The motion carried (6-1) (Commissioner McClung opposed).
. REPORTS
A. Planning Commissioners
.
.
e
e
City Council Meeting
July 11, 2005
Attachment 6A - 5
.
.
.
July 6, 2005
Mayor Beverly Aplikowski
City of Arden Hills
1245 West Hwy 96
Arden Hills, MN 55112
Mayor Applikowski,
My name is Toni Tredal and I live at 4521 Keithson Drive, Arden Hills.
I want to state that I'm apposed to the "Arden Hills Office Park"
project as proposed for many reasons some of which are:
*Density (number and size of buildings)
*Lack of green space
*Lack of adequate parking for the size and scope of the project
*No bid process for the property
*Low price per acre compared to other property sold in the area
*Poor access and return to Hwy 96 (requires a U turn to go West on
96)
* Zoning permits, Not Office Park - It's a strip mall
All this being said it does not address my main concern which is
Royal Oaks Realty and Marcel Eibensteiner being the developer of
this project.
In 1988 we (Mark Magers & I) purchased property from Royal Oaks
Realty to build a home on Keithson Drive. We wanted to live in Arden
Hills because of the absence of commercial development and the
zoning laws that protected us from a "strip mall environment". We
knew this would result in higher taxes but were willing to pay them
based on the quality of life we wanted. Unfortunately it was the start
of a nightmare that latest over five (5) years and cost the City of
Arden Hills, our neighbors and us thousands of dollars in
assessments, weeks, months and years of anguish, hours of
meetings with the City of Arden Hills, Rice Creek Watershed District, .
city engineers and lawyers trying to design and complete the
"Beautifully Landscaped Pond" that was promised but abandoned by
Royal Oaks Realty and Marcel Eibensteiner leaving a slew filled with
construction debris that had to be pumped, by the residents to
prevent overflow, cased damage to all surrounding property and the
loss of dozens of trees. This was only to be compounded by
improperly installed sewer lines to the houses that broke causing
erosion from the houses to the street and eventually eroding the
street to the point that in three years after install it was not drivable
and had to be reconstructed at the expense of the City of Arden Hills
and additional home owner assessments. We could go on and on
listing all the issues we had to deal with to complete the Keithson
Pond Neighborhood. It is a fact that our issues were act of "gross
negligence" on the part of the Royal Oaks Realty, City of Arden Hills,
The Watershed District, and SHE who was the city engineer at the
time. All of the people at the City of Arden Hills and Rice Creek
Watershed districts are long gone from their positions but the one
constant remains ... Royal Oaks Realty and Marcel Eibensteiner the .
man who was at the center of all the issues, the man who profited
from the sale of the property, who did not comply with the City of
Arden Hills requirements, who did not comply with the Rice Creek
Watershed requirements, who did not comply with the city engineer
requirements, and who broke his promises to the homeowners along
Keithson Drive.
We are will aware of "Buyer Beware" and have learned the hard way
that there is little recourse after the fact but I also believe that "Tigers
Do Not Change Their Stripes." Royal Oaks Reality and Marcel
Eibensteiner among many other things have proven in the past to not
be responsive to the City of Arden Hills, willfully not complying with
the permit requirements by the City Engineer and Rice Creek
Watershed District. Marcel Eibensteiner clearly abandoned and
closed down the Keithson Development once the lots were sold and
before completion of the requirements knowing full well that once
Keithson Development was shut down there would be no recourse for
the city or home owners.
The logic that the City of Arden Hills would even entertain doing
business with Royal Oaks Realty escapes our sense of reasoning.
.
,
.
.
.
..
What are you elected to do if not protect the citizens of Arden Hills
from willful and flagrant abuse of the rules, policies and regulations?
What would be different with this project, how could you trust the
word of a man or a company that had betrayed The City of Arden
Hills in the past?
Sincerely,
Toni Tredal
Mark Magers
Cc: David Grant
Brenda Holden
Gregg Larson
Lois Rem
Peter Hellegers
~
~HILLS
City ot Arden Hills
Re uest for Council Action
Prepared by: PH
Dep!.: Com. Dev.
Council Mtg. Date: 7/11/2005
Final Action Needed By:
7/29/2005
Agenda Item , m ~
PC# 05-17: Presbyterian Homes SUP Amendment for an addition to the
McKnillht Care Center
Budgeted Amount: $0.00
Actual Amount: $0.00
Funding Source: N/A
Council Action Request:
. Consider Resolution 05-46 which would approve a Special Use Permit Amendment for an addition to the
south end of the McKnight Care Center
. Consider the SUP Amendment form.
Staff Recommendation:
. Approve Resolution 05-46 which would approve a Special Use Permit Amendment for an addition to the south
end of the McKnight Care Center
. Approve the SUP Amendment form.
Advisory Commission Action:
____,_______~--.----m'.-.--.^.-.-..-----.--
Commission
-
Planning
PTRC
Date
7/6/2005
Action
... . ,<\(Jproved (7..(j)
NO~}\(Jplicable
N()t"ppllc;,,_ble...
--------------,
.-----------,
Supporting Documents (which are attached to this Action Form):
[gJ Memo/Letter:
- Special Use Permit Amendment Form 05-17
- Staff Report to the City Council - July 11, 2005
[gJ Resolution (No. 05-46)
D Ordinance (No.
D Engineering Recommendation:
D Attorney Recommendation:
DOther:
Financial Implications:
.dministratorlStaff Comments:
Page 1 of 1
.
.
.
,
~
~~HILLS
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
Agenda Item 6.B
July 11, 2005
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Peter Hellegers, City Planner
SUBJECT: PC #05-17, Senior Housing Partners (for Presbyterian Homes)
3220 Lake Johanna Boulevard - McKnight Care Center Addition/Remodeling
SUP Amendment
Requested Action
. Consider the attached Resolution No. 05-46 which would approve the requested Special
Use Permit Amendment for an addition to the south end of the McKnight Care Center on
the Presbyterian Homes property in Arden Hills subject to seven conditions.
. Consider the attached Special Use Permit No. 05-17.
Planninl! Commission Recommendation
At their July 6, 2005 meeting the Planning Commission reviewed Planning Case #05-17 and
unanimously recommended approval (7-0) of the Special Use Permit Amendment for the
McKnight Care Center Addition Presbyterian Homes, after making a finding that the building
addition for the special use of institutional housing will not have an adverse impact on the
surrounding properties or on the community as a whole; subject to the following seven (7)
conditions:
1. Revised Final Plans. The applicant shall submit revised plans, responsive to the
comments from the Plan Review Comments section (section 9) of the July 6, 2005 Staff
Report to the Planning Commission, contained in City Planning File #05-12, for review
and approval by the City Planner, City Engineer, and City Building Official, prior to
issuance ofbuilding permits.
2. Landscaping Plans. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan for review and
approval by the City Planner prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit.
3. Screening of Mechanical Operating Equipment. All mechanical operating equipment
shall be screened to meet City regulations.
4. Noise Level of Mechanical Operating Equipment. All mechanical operating
equipment shall meet the City regulations for noise levels. Ifthe City Council determines
\\Earth\Planning\P~anning Cases\1005\05-17 Pres Homes SUP Amendment McKnight Care Ctr Addition (PENDING)\07-11-05 CC Report 05-
17.doc
Page 1 of2
that the noise level from the mechanical operating equipment is not meeting City
regulations for noise levels; the applicant shall be required to reduce the noise levels from .
the mechanical operating equipment.
5. Protective Fencing on the Retaining Wall. Protective fencing shall be erected at the
top of the retaining wall. Fencing may be decorative (wrought iron) or a vinyl coated
chain link style fencing (suggest black, brown, or dark green).
6. Execution of an SUP Amendment Permit. Execution of an SUP Amendment Permit
drafted by the City Attorney and approved by the City Council prior to the issuance of a
Building Permit.
7. Necessary Approvals from Other Agencies. The applicant shall obtain all necessary
permits from the Rice Creek Watershed District, Rmnsey County, the State of Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources and any other governing agencies where applicable.
J
Deadline for A!!encv Actions - July 29, 2005
The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on May 31, 2005
Pursuant to Minnesota State Statue, the City must act on this request by July 29,2005 (60 days),
unless the city provides the petitioner with written reasons for and additional 60 day review
period. The City may with the petitioners' consent extend the review period beyond the 120
days.
Options
1.
2.
3.
Recommend approval as submitted.
Recommend approval with conditions.
Recommend denial with reasons for denial. If the City denies the petitioners request,
"...it must state in writing the reasons for the denial at the time it denies the request."
Table for additional information.
.
4.
Attachments
6B-l Resolution 05-46; Approving a Special Use Permit Amendment for Presbyterian
Homes
6B-2 SUP Document 05-17
6B-3 Staff Report to the Planning Commission - July 6,2005
6B-4 Planning Commission Minute Excerpt - July 6, 2005
\\Earth\Planning\Planning Cases\2005\05-] 7 Pres Homes SUP Amendment McKnight Care CtT Addition (PFNDlNG)\07-1 J -05 CC Report 05- .
17.doc
Page 2 of2
,
. City Council Meeting
Attachment 6B - 1
.
.
July 11, 2005
.
.
.
~
~~HILLS
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 05-46
RESOLUTION APPROVING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT FOR
PRESBYTERIAN HOMES
WHEREAS: on May 31, 2005 Senior Housing Partners on behalf of Presbyterian
Homes submitted a completed application for review of a Special Use Permit
Amendment which would allow an addition to the south end of the McKnight
Care Center on the Presbyterian Homes property located at 3220 Lake Johanna
Boulevard In Arden Hills.
WHEREAS: on July 6, 2005, a public hearing was held by the Planning Commission
reviewing the application by Senior Housing Partners on behalf of Presbyterian
Homes and at the conclusion of the public hearing the Planning Commission
unanimously recommended approval subject to seven (7) conditions of approval
and after considering the effect on the proposed use based upon health, safety,
convenience and general welfare of the owners and occupants of the
surrounding land, in particular, and the community as a whole, in general,
including but not limited to the following factors:
existing and anticipated liquid or solid waste, and other nuisance
characteristics; drainage; population density; visual and land use
compatibility with uses and structures on surrounding land; adjoining land
values; park dedications where applicable, and the orderly development of
the neighborhood and the City within the general purpose and intent of the
orderly development of the neighborhood and the City within the general
purpose and intent of this ordinance and the Comprehensive
Development Plan for the City.
WHEREAS: on July 11, 2005, the City Council received the recommendations of the
Planning Commission.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: That the Council of the City of Arden Hills
approves the Special Use Permit Amendment for Presbyterian Homes, dated July 11,
2005.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS THIS 11th
DAY OF JULY, 2005.
Beverly Aplikowski, Mayor
,
ATTEST:
.
Michelle A. Wolfe, City Administrator
.
.
.
.
.
City Council Meeting
Attachment 6B - 2
July 11, 2005
.
.
.
DRAFT
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
SPECIAL USE PERMIT
CASE NO. 05-17
1.0 Recitals.
A.
Presbyterian Homes of Minnesota, a Minnesota non-profit
corporation (the "Permitee") represents that it is the record fee
owner of the following described property situated in Ramsey
County, Minnesota, to wit (the "Property"):
All that part of Lot 5, Section 33, Township 30, Range 23
described as follows, to wit: Beginning at a point on
the west line of said Lot 4, 400 feet north of the
southwest corner of said lot: thence North on the west
line of said Lot 5 to a point where the said north line
intersects with easterly line of said Lot 5; thence along
the said easterly line of said Lot 5 to the intersection
thereof with the northerly line of that tract or parcel of
land in said Lot 5 heretofore conveyed to Martin Hosli
by Deed recorded in "494" Deeds 93; thence West
along the said northerly line of said tract of land
heretofore conveyed to the said Martin Hosli to a point
distant 884.8 feet due north of the south line of said Lot
5 and 935.8 feet due east from the west line of said Lot
5; thence in a southwesterly direction 936 feet to a
point on the south line of said Lot 5 distant 630 feet
east of the southwest corner thereof; thence north
along the west line of said Lot 5 to the point of
beginning, excepting therefrom the following
described property: the southerly 400 feet of said Lot 5
which lies westerly of a line which is 66 feet
northwesterly of and parallel to the following
described line: beginning at a point on the south line
of said Lot 5, 5,630 feet east of the southwest corner
thereof; thence running northeasterly in a straight line
936 feet to a point which is 884.8 feet due north of the
south line of said Lot 5 and 945.8 feet due east of the
west line of said Lot 5.
.
B. The Property is located in an R-2 Zoning District.
C. The City of Arden Hills has issued prior special use permits and
amendments to special use permits for the Property as contained in
Planning Case File Nos. 70-52, 73-10 and 75-17 A.
D. On May 31, 2005. the Senior Housing Partners, on behalf of Permitee,
submitted a completed application for review of a special use
permit amendment which would allow an addition to the south end
of the McKnight Care Center on the Property.
E.
At a public hearing on June 6, 2005. the Arden Hills Planning
Commission reviewed the application, the report and
recommendations of the Arden Hills City Planner, the comments
made at the public hearing, and recommended approval of the
special use permit (the "SUP") subject to certain conditions.
.
2.0 Approval of SUP. On July 11, 2005, the Arden Hills City Council considered
the recommendations of the Arden Hills City Planner, the
recommendations of the Planning Commission, the effects of the
proposed SUP on the health, safety, convenience and general welfare of
the owners and occupants of the surrounding land, and the community
as a whole; and adopted Resolution No. 05-46 approving the SUP and
allowing the Property to be used for the construction of an addition to the
south end of the McKnight Care Center. The approval of the Arden Hills
City is subject to the following conditions:
A.
Revised Final Plans. The applicant shall submit revised plans,
responsive to the comments from the Plan Review Comments
section (section 9) of the July 6, 2005 Staff Report to the Planning
Commission, contained in City Planning File #05-12, for review and
approval by the City Planner, City Engineer, and City Building
Official, prior to issuance of building permits.
.
2
.
.
.
B.
Landscaping Plans. The applicant sholl submit 0 revised landscape
plan for review and approval by the City Planner prior to the
issuance of on occupancy permit.
C. Screening of Mechanical Operating Equipment. All mechanical
operating equipment sholl be screened to meet City regulations.
D. Noise Level of Mechanical Operating Equipment. All mechanical
operating equipment sholl meet the City regulations for noise
levels. If the City Council determines that the noise level from the
mechanical operating equipment is not meeting City regulations
for noise levels; the applicant sholl be required to reduce the noise
levels from the mechanical operating equipment.
E. Protective Fencing on the Retaining Wall. Protective fencing sholl
be erected at the top of the retaining wall. Fencing may be
decorative (wrought iron) or 0 vinyl coated chain link style fencing
(suggest block, brown, or dark green).
F.
Execution of an SUP Amendment Permit. Execution of on SUP
Amendment Permit drafted by the City Attorney and approved by
the City Council prior to the issuance of a Building Permit.
G. Necessary Approvals from Other Agencies. The applicant shall
obtain 011 necessary permits from the Rice Creek Watershed District,
Ramsey County, the State of Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources and any other governing agencies where applicable
3.0 Compliance. Permitee hereby agrees to comply with the conditions of
approval for the SUP.
Dated this _ day of July, 2005
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
By:
Beverly Aplikowski
Its: Mayor
PRESBYTERIAN HOMES OF MINNESOTA
By:
Name:
3
Its:
.
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF
On this _ day of , 2005, before me, a notary public within
and for said county, personally appeared Beverly Aplikowski, to me known to be
the Mayor of the City of Arden Hills, and she executed the foregoing instrument
and acknowledged that she executed the same by authority of and on behalf
of City of Arden Hills.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF
On this _ day of , 2005, before me, a notary public within
and for said county, personally appeared , to me known to
be the of Presbyterian Homes of Minnesota, a Minnesota non- .
profit corporation, and s/he executed the foregoing instrument an,j
acknowledged that s/he executed the same by authority of and on behalf of
the corporation.
Notary Public
F:\users\Janice\Jerry\Arden Hills\Presb Homes SUP. doc
.
4
.
.
.
City Council Meeting
July 11, 2005
Attachment 6B - 3
.
~
~HILLS
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
3.A
July 6, 2005
PC Agenda Item
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Peter Hellegers, City Planner
SUBJECT: PC #05-17, Senior Housing Partners (for Presbyterian Homes)
3220 Lake Johanna Boulevard - McKnight Care Center Addition/Remodeling
SUP Amendment
Requested Action
Consider the requested Special Use Permit Amendment for an addition to the south end of the
McKnight Care Center on the Presbyterian Homes property in Arden Hills.
Backl!round
. Surrounding Area
.
North
R-2: Single & Two Family
Residential
R-2: Single & Two Family
Residential
Lake Johanna/R-I: Single
Famil Residential
R-2: Single & Two Family
Residential
Multiple Family Residential
Lake Johanna / Single Family
Detached Residential
Single Family Detached
Residential
Low Density Rcsldential
Single Family Detached
Residential
South
Public & Institutional
Lake Johanna! Low Density
Residential
East
West
Low Density Residential
Site Data
Public & Institutional
Multiple Family Residential
R-2: Single & Two Family Residential
26.02 acres (1,133,254 square feet)
Slopes downward from west to east toward Lake JohaJilla.
\\Earlh\Planning\Planning Cases\2005\Q5-17 Pres Homes SUP AmendmenL McKnight Care Ctr Addition (PENDlNG)\07-06-05 PC Report Pres
Home McKnight Care Center Addition SUP Amend PC-05-17.doc
Page 1 of7
Soecial Use Permit Amendment
The applicant has requested that the Planning Commission review a Special Use Permit
Amendment to allow a 13,156 square foot addition to the south end of the McKnight Care
Center.
.
Overview
The applicant is proposing a Special Use Permit (SUP) Amendment to allow for an addition to
the south end of the McKnight Care Center. Currently the McKnight Care Center houses 208
skilled care residents. The State of Minnesota granted an exception to the Nursing Home
Moratorium to allow for the changes to occur. The proposed addition would allow Presbyterian
Homes to eliminate twelve (12) 3-bed rooms and move to a configuration of single bed rooms
and 2-bed rooms, allow for separate dining areas, and add a fourth floor rooftop garden. While
the addition work would take place Pres. Homes would also take the opportunity to update the
look ofthe interior spaces.
The addition is proposed to maintain the existing west building line or in some places come two
feet closer to Lake Johanna Boulevard, still meeting the City's setbacks, and would use exterior
materials that coordinate with the existing building. The number of residents at the McKnight
Care Center would not change; they would simply be in different room configurations. Also, the
number of employees would stay the smne. There would be excavation along the west side of
the building into the hill to allow for adequate space and light to resident rooms. The trees along
the west property line should not be affected; any other trees that would be affected and cannot
be moved would be replaced with new plantings. No new exterior signage would be added as
part ofthis project.
.
Following are some tables with pertinent information:
Resident Bed Count
Floor Number of Existing Beds Number of New Beds
First Floor 16 28
Second Floor 60 61
Third Floor 60 61
.- -----.
Fourth Floor 70 58
Total 208 208
Building Area
Existing Gross S.F. Addition Total Gross S.F.
First Floor 26,956 4,125 31,081
Second Floor 25,788 4,125 29,913
...IJ1iI:dFloor 25,788 4,125 29,913 ---
Fourth Floor 22,264 I 781 23,045
Total 100,796 I 13,156 113,952
\\Earth\Planning\Planning Cases\2005\OS-17 Pres Homes SUP Amendment McKnight Care CtT Addition (PENDIJ\1G)\07-06-0S PC Report Pres .
Home McKnight Care Center Addition SUP Amend PC-05-] 7.doc
Page 2 of7
.
.
.
Special Use Permit
A Special Use Permit is required for institutional housing in the R-2: Single & Two Fmnily
Residential District. Special Use Permit (SUP) #70-52 approved a building addition to the main
Presbyterian Homes building (Lakeview Residence). SUP #75-17 approved the Geriatric Center
(McKnight Care Center).
Plan Review
1. Zoning - Meets Requirements
Institutional housing is listed as a special use in the R-2: Single and Two Family Residential
Zoning District.
Building Setbacks
Following is a comparison of the proposed setbacks as compared with the setback standards
established by the Zoning Ordinance.
42.9'
Front Yard
(Lake Johanna Blvd.)
2. Special Use Permit Analysis - Finding Required
Special Use/Special Use Permit - Since institutional housing is listed as a special use in the R-2:
Single and Two Fmnily Residential District, review of this item requires that the Planning
Commission (and City Council) consider certain nuisance characteristics.
Section 8, D, 3, b ofthe Arden Hills Zoning Ordinance states that the City Council and Planning
Commission:
"__.shall consider the effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, convenience and
general welfare of the owners and occupants of surrounding land, in particular, and the
community as a whole, in general, including but not limited to the following factors:
existing and anticipated traffic and parking conditions; noise, glare, odors, vibration.
smoke, dust, air pollution, heat, liquid or solid waste, and other nuisance characteristics;
drainage; population density; visual and land use compatibility with uses and structures
on surrounding land; adjoining land values; park dedications where applicable, and the
orderly development of the neighborhood and the City within the general purpose and
intent of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Development Plan for the City. ..
\\Earth\Planning\Planning Cases\1005\05-17 Pres Homes SUP Amendment McKnight Care Or Addition (PENDING)\07-06-05 PC Report Pres
Home McKnight Care Ccmer Addition SUP Amend PC-05-17.doc
Page 3 of7
3. Landscaping - Does not include trees in the 3.5-4.0 caliper inch category. .
(The upper end of the proposed range meets the minimum total caliper inch landscaping requirement; does not
meet requirement for percentage of caliper inches; additional caliper inches of existing mature trees may be
preserved but have not been included in these calculations)
Minimum Landscaping Requirements
Under the City's landscape plan design requirements 41.11 caliper inches of trees are
required (the minimum total caliper inches required for trees can be arrived at by dividing the
gross square footage of all floors of the building [13,156 by 320) for this case. The applicant
has proposed 37.85-45.32 total caliper inches of new trees, the upper end of that range would
meet the requirement per the minimum landscaping requirements. In the 4.5 to 5 Inch
Caliper Inch category the proposed landscaping does not meet the required 3.48 caliper
inches. However, this is offset by the proposed landscaping being more than 4 times the
required total mnount.
Caliper Inches of Trees (required / proposed)
Required for
buildings of 1-2 50 % (20.56) 30%(12.33) 20 % (8.22)
Stories .
Proposed # of (14.50-20.32) (0.00) (20.85-25.00)
Caliper Inches
4. Aesthetics/Building Materials - Meets Requirement.
Face brick is proposed to coordinate with the existing exterior of the McKnight Care Center.
Trim materials would also match the building to provide a consistent look to the building,
like it was all built at the same time. A knee wall would be used around the fourth floor
garden with a 6-foot high prefinished metal fence above, The fence would likely be a vinyl
coated fence, tan in color to blend with the building but open enough to allow residents to
view the outdoors. The rooftop garden would also include some plantings to make the area
more attractive for residents but would also help create a better view from the street as well.
5. Height of Buildings - Meets Requirement
The addition is proposed to maintain the existing building height and at the southern end of
the addition would be shorter since part of the area is the rooftop garden. The rooftop garden
area at the top of the fence is still not as tall as the existing roof height.
\\Farth\Phmning\PJanning Cases\2005\OS-17 Pres Homes SUP Amendmcn1 McKnight Care Or Addition (PENDlNG)\07-06-05 PC Report Pres .
I lome McKnight Care Center Addition SUP Amend PC-05-17 .doc
Page 4 of7
. 6. Screening - Meets Requirement.
The existing trees along the west property line are proposed to stay. The shPlbs behind those
trees would likely be removed to make way for the new retaining wall. Several of the large
coniferous trees at the south end of the existing building which currently help to screen the
building would be affected by the addition. The applicant has proposed to relocate these
trees if possible, and replace the trees if relocation is not feasible. The preservation of as
many existing trees as possible will help screen the building addition from the residential
properties to the west.
The applicant will need to verify that all mechanical equipment is screened, consistent with
Section 6E4j of the City's Zoning Ordinance, including the transformer (shown as site plan
note #21).
7. Lighting - Meets Requirement.
General requirements for lighting state that the source oflighting shall be concealed or
hooded and also that lights shall not cast light exceeding a meter reading of 1.0 foot candle
on the trdvellanes of adjoining public streets or 0.4 foot candles on adjoining residential
property.
.
The applicant has proposed a total of 5 wall pack style light fixtures along the west and south
sides of the building. These lights would be below the grade of Lake Johanna Boulevard and
should therefore not be visible from neighboring residential properties. The applicant should
confirm that the lighting will meet the City's lighting requirements.
8. Grading, Drainage, and Utilities - Revised plans to address the comments and questions of
the City Engineer regarding Grading, Drainage, and Utilities should be submitted.
The City Engineer has reviewed the applicant's plans and has indicated areas for revision of
plans and areas where additional details are required. The Planning Commission should
review the plan review comments below and determine if they are comfortable with the City
Engineer's recommendations as they relate to the grading, drainage and utility plans. If the
Planning Commission is comfortable with the plans subject to the City Engineers
recommendations, a condition should be added directing the applicant to submit revised
grading, drainage, and utility plans to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to the
issuance of building permits.
The applicant shall also be required to obtain the necessary permits from the Rice Creek
Watershed District in regard to drainage, erosion control, and stormwater; and from Ramsey
County in regard to work within the Ramsey County right-of-way.
.
\\Earlh\PJanning\Planning Cases\2005\05-17 Pres Homes SUP Amendment McKnight Care elT Addition (PENDrNG)\07-06-05 PC Report Pres
Home McKnight Care Center Addition SUP Amend PC-05-I7.doc
Page 5 of7
9. Additional Plan Review Comments - Plan review comments received from City staff, the
City Engineer, and the Lake Johanna Fire Department.
.
1. Applications for building permits shall be submitted two weeks prior to the planned date
of construction. Building permits approved by the Building Official shall be required
prior to the start of any construction.
2. Please revise watermain connection to existing. Wet tap is not feasible with this design.
Watermain will have to be cut. How many residents will be out of water? Will
temporary water services be required? What time will the relocation be done? Will this
be night work? How many services will be relocated as a result of relocating watermain?
How will watermain be disinfected prior to turning on?
3. Ask Operations and Maintenance Superintendent ifhe would want the additional gate
valves the relocation areas.
4. Remove the old watermain pipe.
5. Show profile of proposed watermain pipe.
6. The City uses CEAM spec for watermain installation; please include this in the plan.
7. Contact Ramsey COWlty for their approval on proposed watermain location, geogrid in
the ROWand bit. patching section.
8. Construct railing or fence along top of wall.
9. Bit. patching section for Johanna Blvd should match existing section (consult Dan Soler
at Rmnsey County).
10. Please note sidewalk grades on the plan.
11. Geogrid should be located on property. May need encroachment permit from County.
12. Provide erosion control plan for project.
13. Where does the existing storm sewer go?
14. Obtain watershed permit.
15. Provide traffic control plan.
16. Who will be responsible for the storm sewer after construction?
.
Staff Recommendation
In Planning Case #05-17 staff recommends approval of the Special Use Permit Amendment for
the Presbyterian Homes, after making a finding that the special use will not have an adverse
impact on the surrounding properties or on the community as a whole; subject to the following
seven (7) conditions:
A. Revised Final Plans. The applicant shall submit revised plans, responsive to the
comments from the Plan Review Comments section of this report (9), contained in City
Planning Pile #05-12, for review and approval by the City Planner, City Engineer, and
City Building Official, prior to issuance of building permits.
B. Landscaping Plans. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan for review and
approval by the City Planner prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit.
C. Screening of Mechanical Operating Equipment. All mechanical operating equipment
shall be screened to meet City regulations.
Page 6 of7
.
\\Eartl1\Planning\Plunoing Cases\2005\05-17 Pres Homes SUP Amendment McKnight Care Ctr Addition (PENDTNG)\07-06-05 PC Report Pres
Borne McKnight Care Center Addition SUP Amend PC-05-17_doc
.
.
.
D. Noise Level of Mechanical Operating Equipment. All mechanical operating
equipment shall meet the City regulations for noise levels. If the City Council determines
that the noise level from the mechanical operating equipment is not meeting City
regulations for noise levels; the applicant shall he required to reduce the noise levels from
the mechanical operating equipment.
E. Protective Fencing on the Retaining Wall. Protective fencing shall be erected at the
top of the retaining wall. Fencing may be decorative (wrought iron) or a vinyl coated
chain link style fencing (suggest black, brown, or dark green).
F. Execution of an SUD Amendment Permit. Execution of an SUP Amendment Permit
drafted by the City Attorney and approved by the City Council prior to the issuance of a
Building Permit.
G. Necessary Approvals from Other Agencies. The applicant shall obtain all necessary
permits from the Rice Creek Watershed District, Rmnsey County, the State of Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources and any other governing agencies where applicable.
Options
1. Recommend approval as submitted.
2. Recommend approval with conditions.
3. Recommend denial with reasons for denial. If the City denies the petitioners request,
"...it must state in writing the reasons for the denial at the time it denies the request."
4. Table for additional information.
Deadline for Al!encv Actions - July 29,2005
The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on May 31, 2005
Pursuant to Minnesota State Statue, the City must act on this request by July 29,2005 (60 days),
unless the city provides the petitioner with written reasons for and additional 60 day review
period. The City may with the petitioners' consent extend the review period beyond the 120
days.
Attachments
3a-l Location Map, other pertinent maps
3a-2 Plans and statement of request submitted by the applicant
3a-3 Neighborhood Meeting Flyer for McKnight Care Center Addition
3a-4 SUP #75-17A with plan information and SUP #70-52.
\\Earth\Planning\Planning Cases\2005\05-17 Pres Homes SUP Amendment McKnight Care CtT Addition (PENDING)\07~06-05 PC Report Pres
Home McKnight Care Center Addition SUP Amend PC-05-17.doc
Page 70f7
r_
.
.
Planning Commission Meeting
July 6, 2005
Attachment 3a - 1
..~
"P. ~..,
8.>>"&:: i!'"
..~ .
~~a.~ -H.,
t ,g-...."!;..
,!.!;~ .
- ~ 0'; ~j;
:!.:I.D~Hf:g~
eOlIl.. .>>
III"" b;_~lfl1 ~
co IJfliIl'"'.I/.; If
0 ij~QI~~l~
0 el~ SlO......
N ~-ii ..~
c !! ';:R ~ii
.8~~~~~~
" ~a.p';'.
2 . ~ .. .
(fJ -" .~ d~:i'
ID
"- ~ ~Bi Rf
~ c: "- g;~~,~h
" ~;~.a~i~;:
d '" i~oa..~~
0 ID ~~;::;.II~
~ -.. f C iI E
-. .-"-~
::t " ~.~o.si"
0- m p,;~~p
:f.:~ ,,- '"' . P'-;
i~ 1ii '" "~1-'f~~ .
Z (U >- 5..;....~,f"'~ il
~. ..~. .-~.
C IJ~ u..o-
;:: =. ' . ~8~~~b.~~g
~
,,~ 0 ";O~b~"ijon
5 ~;: 0 2 u !~~9~~;:~
. , >-
'" ID ::i'Su"v.g; ;
N _
~ , " n ;o.tr~~f
0 E ~ ...o~rn ~"t-
" ;':i:~~S~~~"
(C '~~., d
~_",b.~~B :.::
<f? -J 01 "D~';iJS"~~
E:..tEtlt.,;.~
!! ~~E~~~~~~
~ '>>S~::!!~ll;~~"S
ili"'8f~~-.~
'" Ef~E~~..f..
~ -" "'.. 'Q"'>>
1= !I j; ~ IFdJ -!! IJ
<jz
~
ill
ill
LL
o
o
ro
0
0 0
0 'i'
'i'
II
,
~
ill 0
'"
0
(f)
0
0
'i'
.
\ .'
.
.
Planning Commission Meeting
July 6, 2005
Attachment 3a - 2
1i
.'
"
[ )
~
~HILLS
1245 West Highway 96
Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112
Telephone (651) 634-5120
Fax (651) 634-4137
www.ci.arden-hills.mn.us
Planning Case No.
Submittal Date
Application Accepted By'
Receipt Number
Council Decision
Council Decision Date
2005 LAND USE APPLICATION
Applicant Information
Applicant: 30n", f'r\..eh"lc.-ins -S-E'l'\to.... ~~l"-~ 'Po....+t\-tr.s
Address: 2~4 S-. \-).(lY"'- h",,q, A"'t. Iv. ~ (00) Ros.('u: It., t'\\...v SS'lI) ~.
Telephone No.: (Ps: 1- "'3 I:.. (;" 3 1'3
Fax No.: (, S 1- "':1'1 -G" Sa I
EmailAddress: :Jrn4lh...\c.e",s G> S",,,j().,- pco.r+l\-tr-S . C~I'V'
Property Information
Property Owner
)
Owner Address
Address of Property Involved:
Legal Description:
'Pr~~bykr"lo.", H-o~t'SO~ Arct~... \--).; lli
:$2.20 \.-""ke JVho.,,~,,- .0\\10.
A "d.b' l-l:\h l'-(\l\f S$" tic...
) .
S oPe o,:\--4-rA c.. "'--'1 d. .
.
Property ID No.:
Current Zoning:
Type of Use:
Property Acreage:
4133 - :s 0 2- ~ - L.\ 1 - 000 Z - 3
R'2.
s'c.\\-to I<>..js;"~",,,~ liUl(\.J 'S~I'\\()'-r CCA-'fZ
30.1~
ape of Reauest*
.. Apportionment of Assessments ($30)
D Comprehensive Plan Amendment ($300)
o Final Plat (including in Preliminary Plat)
o Minor Subdivision (lot split/consolidation) ($300)
o Planned Unit Development ($600 + escrow)
o Preliminary Plat ($400 + $25 per lot + escrow)
o Rezoning ($300)
D Site Plan Review ($400)
IB' Special Use Permit or Amended Special Use Permit ($300)
o Vacation of Easement ($250 + escrow)
D Variance (Sign Ordinance) ($250)
o Variance (Zoning Ordinance) ($250)
D Zoning Ordinance Amendment ($300 + escrow)
Page 1 of3
'Applicants are responsible for
reimbursement of consultant
fees associated with filing,
reviewing, and processing of
this application. Such fees are to
be paid in escrow up front or
upon receipt of statement from
the City of Arden Hills. Fees
include costs for consultants
retained by the City and include
consultant planning services,
attorney, and engineer.
Payment of park dedication
fees, established by City
Ordinance, are required with
certain procedures.
.
-;
i~
, ,
.
.
"
Brief Description of Request (please also include a detailed letter explainina the proiect):
A \'!oj I~<" SoD \Ll'Aro. ~c>c)~ o..J.J..~l().... /V-i>t'>l'-Ouccl.l 0,," -\--0
\
('Y\.~\(N '"3'-'----+- Car-t C-f"'+..t.... - po.....-\- c! 'PN.d,,)'+-ef'ICA...... 't-\o-M--€s
04 Af"(\~"" 'J;\k l"CA M.p'-' 1. -\.-0 1 t\;\.pr,h'-I'. -\-\...~
a VlIL\ ;1.-y I"l-C. r-~S \ t\..u..+ CrJ..o(..Il
~
FilinQ ReQuirements and Payment of Fees
The City requests that you make a pre-application meeting with the City Planner to discuss the
application process, requirements, and deadlines. The undersigned acknowledges that she/he
understands that before this request can be considered, all required information and fees (including all
deposits) must be paid to the City in advance. If additional fees are required to cover costs incurred by
the City. the City Planner has the right to require additional payment from one or more of the
undersigned, who shall be jointly liable for such fees. Such expenses may include (but are not limited to)
direct city payroll and overhead costs, fees paid to consultants and other professionals, and the cost of
printing. mailing, and supplies. The City may withhold final action on a land use application and/or
rescind prior action until all miscellaneous fees have been paid. Applicants are advised that an escrow
deposit is required at the time of the submittal of the Land Use Application to offset costs associated with
the proposed project.
Required Submittal Information
The City of Arden Hills requires the following submittals for all Land Use Applications:
. A certified land survey.
. Site plan(s) (for all development projects).
. Five (5) large scale copies. folded in sets no larger than 8 )1," x 14" with the print side facing out,
. Fifty (50) copies of 11" x 17" reductions of ALL PLANS MUST BE 3-HOLE PUNCHED AND Z-
FOLDED.
. Mailing iabels of all properties within 350 feet of the property (this information may be obtained from
Ramsey County).
True and accurate representation of the requirements outlined in the procedural form for the specified
type of request Is the responsibility of the applicant.
Completellncomplete Applications
An incomplete application will delay the processing of land use requests. The application approval time
commences and an application is considered officially filed when the City Planner has received and
examined the application and determined that the application is complete. A decision on whether the
application is complete or incomplete shall be made within fifteen (15) days following the submittal of the
application. When the application is deemed to be "complete" it shall be placed on the agenda of the first
possible Planning Commission meeting occurring at least thirty (30) days from the date of official
submission of the application.
Page 2 of 3
~
"
Notice of Meetina Attendance
In order for the Planning Commission and the City Council to consider any application, the applicant or a
desillnated representative must be present at the scheduled meeting. If not, the matter will be tqbleduntil
the next available agenda.
.
AQenda Deadline and MeetinQ Schedule
The deadline for submittal of land use applications is required according to the schedule outlined below.
There are no exceptions. All Planning Commission meetings are held on the first Wednesday of each
month at 7:00 PM. City Council meetings are held the last Monday of the same month at 7:00 PM.
Meetings are held in the Council Chambers at the City of Arden Hills, 1245 West Highway 96, Arden Hills,
Minnesota 55112, unless otherwise stated. Applicants are advised that additional meetings and/or
workshops are scheduled wh7n necessary upon approval of the Planning Commission.
2005 SCHEDULE ('subject to change)
APPLICATION
DEADLINE
DATE'
TENTATIVE
PLANNING
CC>MMISSION
MEtnNG'
(Generally held on
1"Wednesda at 7:00
TENTATIVE
CITY COUNCIL
MEI:TING
DATE'
(Generally held on
last Monda at 7:00 .m.
.
Acknowledqemeritand Siqnature
I acknowledge that I have read all of the information listed in the City of Arden Hills Land Use Application
and fully understand that I am responsible for all costs incurred by the City related to the processing of
thisapPlicati~.~/L i5' 5/~/)O~
~ignature Date
Please contact the City Planner at (651) 634-5134 if you have any questions regarding your application.
.....'Additional copies of this application form are available on the City's website: httD://www.ci.arden- .
hi/ls.mn. us/Departments/Community Development/Plannina/plannino farms.htm
Page 3 of3
1r4t
\~ )
-
.
PARCEL DESCRIPTION:
(#33-3023-43-0002-3)
All that part of Lot 5, Sect. 33, T. 30, R. 23 described as follows, to-
wit: Beginning at a point on the W. line of said Lot 4, 400 feet N. of
the SW comer of said Lot; thence N. on the W line of said Lot 5 to
a point where the said N. line intersects the E'ly line of said Lot 5;
thence along the said E'ly line of said Lit 5 to the intersection thereof
with the N'ly line of that tract or parce/of land in said Lit 5 heretofore
conveyed to Martin Hosli by Deed recorded in '494" Deeds 93;
thence W along the said N'ly line of said tract of land heretofore
conveyed to the said Martin Hosli to a point distant 884.8 feet due N.
of the S. line of said Liot 5 and 935.8 feet due E. from the W line of
said Lit 5; thence in a SWly direction 936 feet to a point on the S.
line of said Lot 5 distant 630 feet E. of the SW comer thereof; thence
N. along the W line of said Lot 5 to the point of beginning, excepting
therefrom the following described property:
The S'ly 400 feet of said Lot 5 which lies Wly of a line which is 66
feet NWly of and parallel to the fallowing described line: Beginning
fit. a point on the S. line of said Lot 55,630 feet I;. of the sW comer
thereof: thence running NE'ly in a straight line 936 feet to a point
which is 884.8 feet due N. of the S. line of said Lit 5 and 945.8 feet
due E. of the W line of said Lot 5.
,
i'~)
\ --"
Presbyterian Homes of Arden Hills
McKnight Care Center
City of Arden Hills
Special Use Permit
Application Narrative
Background Information
Presbyterian Homes of Arden Hills is located in the City of Arden Hills, Rmnsey County,
Minnesota. It is the birthplace of Presbyterian Homes and Services. McKnight Care
Center is part of the Presbyterian Homes of Arden Hills' cmnpus and is home to 208
skilled care residents.
The State of Minnesota has granted McKnight Care Center an Exception to the Nursing
Home Moratorium. McKnight Care Center is one of five approved for the Exception out
of 38 applicants. This will allow McKnight Care Center to renovate the current facility
and enhance resident quality oflife by addressing current needs. The State of Minnesota
will assist in this process by providing additional debt support. As the deadline for the
Exception to the Nursing Home Moratorium is approaching we are seeking necessary
City Approvals to move forward with the project this summer. We are committed to
improving the quality of care for our residents by implementing the necessary steps to
successfully renovate and remodel McKnight Care Center.
Current Needs
. Eliminate twelve (12) three-bed rooms. Three-bed rooms are no longer
acceptable to residents, their fmnilies or to experts in our field. We plan to
eliminate the twelve three-bed rooms replacing them with private and semi-
private rooms.
. Reduce number of residents on the fourth floor from 72 residents to 58. This will
decrease over stimulation that comes with larger resident groups and increase
quality of life for our residents with dementia. Weare focused on decentralizing
services such as dining and creating smaller fmnily group areas.
. Increase storage for resident equipment. The additional storage will increase
staffs ability to comply with Federal, State and Fire Marshall regulations for
keeping hallways clear. This will again increase quality ofthe resident
environment by eliminating the need for equipment to be stored in resident
common space.
. Create confidential areas for use and storage of medical records. The creation of
these areas will provide spaces for staffs ability to comply with HIP AA
regulations.
.
.
.
~
e
.
Building AdditionslRenovations
. Construction ofa 13,156 square foot addition adjacent to the South end of the
existing building. Consisting of new resident rooms, 4th floor Dining Room, and
4th floor RoofTop Garden.
. Renovation of existing administrative offices to create new resident rooms
. Renovation of current common areas to create equipment storage areas, employee
work areas, and resident community areas.
. Replace corridor carpet
. Paint corridor walls
. Replace aging furnishings.
Site Impact
. Exterior of the Building - materials to coordinate with existing
. Traffic Impact - no change in traffic pattern - the number of residents and
employees remains the smne.
. Landscape - retain/move existing trees replacing plantings unable to be moved.
. Length of Building Construction -11-13 months
. Property Line Set Backs - Building Addition will meet all required city property
line set backs.
. Staffing - Current operations will remain the smne related to deliveries, staffing
patterns, parking and other related activities.
We look forward to working with the City of Arden Hills during the AdditionlRenovation
of McKnight Care Center. Our partnership in this project will improve the dignity and
quality of services and care delivered to the Arden Hills Senior Population. It is our
intent to comply with all City Codes and Requirements in creating a successful addition
to the City of Arden Hills.
~3i:
;;gn
0::-:
mZ
z-
:II:)
_:Z:
.......
...
CIln
~ >
~::a
zm
zn
rnm
oZ
~~
::a
(J'l lc'
~ V>
Q) '.1\
.;,
Ul 0
"
,.
o
.
.
.-
t.e..oo Soc..
:w.....' I
: I
"
:~ I
r~1
J:
. i
.~ I
.tl
~l
, I
I
~
,
1
!1 I
i!-3.l1
.. ~.., H9-'."l-t.
..
~ "':=.t.. 0'00 L.. J.~.
THE.
('+-400
.
~ ...."..3" r1
.
.
.
lIE
S,~3,';; - ---: 1-
,
DE
"
.
,
PRESBYTERIAN
'38'3.~6
t ,'35 I
I
~~) \
C;OVT LOT 5
.
(i)
~
~
78
!;.2.8.d.<...
(3)
""
~ .1._.
I
\
(iBO)
CW
~OO'
, (is) UoOl
\ ~
<!,
'C.2.-4-IlH.. t 61...':1.
"_7.02.
70 .05
-431
L...L5.<t.. f,.o,"" Co,~."'illit "9H.
.........t>. r;;,.:z.-64~.OI
tAT MAP
.
.@.
,
r~___ ---- _.~ .. .--.--- --- _._---~ ...- .-.-- ----.-- -----,,----- ---_.~ _._----~---,-
1; · r .1 . I · .1 . I ".""._, .;'{0 ,'., ',-,
. . .
~ -/ .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ./ /.
I I I
.
. . . . . . .
. . .
. . . .
.~ .
. .
. .
. . . . . . .
.
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. . . .
.
. . . .
. . .
. . . .
.
. .
. . . .
.-- .~
l/~. 0 .
. .
.\ . "
. . .
.\ .
. . . . . . . ~
CO>
.\ . . ~ '.
. . . . . . . . 333023430002
'I . ~ ,
. . .. .
. . '" . l---'- '
. . . . . . . . . ~ . 1 C0 . {~~
. ~
~ \ .. . . J .
. . . . . . . . .. . '>i .
. ..>J . I
\ . j .
.
~ 1. f .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . I --
:~ 333023430003
i- I .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
ljl MAP
4-
r "..... I,
I ~H
,I i) i
I !:A-t ,
... : ~~ I
r ~~ !:;~ ;
~ !; ! -~ I,
r;H ~
H~
, :
If
CI)
~
~
"'<
..
1>
"
..
...
"
'"
'"
'"
'"
'"
d
."
o
!il
'"
l>
."
:z:
-<
...
c'
""
~I
."
o
?:
'tJ
'"
c
. r
I
, '"
(I !'
-\
""~ :t:
0
~~ ,:
'"
-oc: qq' tI)
,,' ;t
.; 0
i:'f? ."
~ ~
,. ~n p
" ~ '"
. ~ n: I:)
f:::i "'- I"l
:::. z
~
"
." ==
5' r-
" r-
'"
I
..I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
-....-., -..... .......
...
-----
!=;ii igi!~!~i:::jH~i~
elti:ii~W"il:f!h~:!:~i
. ...-, ---..1'.....
"'1"'1""'1=-.~ .....,"
.. ... ..., ."u_... r
:.; u.i!lfi':ir~i~:f!;f.i t
~;:i'liJlrl": l'j=i1iii
~H'I:Ui :i;1 i..il!!'~
l;'!il; :l\l~:~i,:t' h!;
.1 l"~t :'.ii"'I.~i;It.P:l...
'.::::'f ii-Iff:l-' ~1:::'
~j~ii f:"i;;;!~!~;~~~;~
. .... -J... 'j""I'-'
!f~~l~~ll~l
.
r......____________~~___
,
.. CpmH)'. -t..~~~::~.,;~:_~t~..:~:?~~..:::.....~~. ___
., .1 , 1 , i ~
,
, , ~ I
I ~
'. i
~: $
i1 ;
'. r
..
,
te
OWNERSHIP REPORT
.
.
~
Owners of Property
Legal Nmne:
Address:
Phone:
Corporate Contact
Nmne/Title
Address:
Phone:
Applicant
Nmne/Titlc
Address:
Phone:
.
Presbyterian Homes of Arden Hills
3220 Lake Johanna Blvd.
Arden Hills, MN 55112
(651) 631-6000
Dan Lindh, President/CEO
Presbyterian HOllies and Services
2845 Hmnline Ave. N. Suite 200
Roseville, MN 55113
(651) 631-6133
John Mehrkens
Deb Zarbok
Senior Housing Partners
2845 Hmnline Ave. N. Suite 100
Roseville, MN 55025
(651) 631-6313
(651) 631-6318
.
.
.
.
a
/.
. ~ ~.
. 4 . -::----~~ ~'n;"'--,;";.~ \', .--'~;"~,, ~ - ~ ~i~ ;'1
!.,' ;':::" ~ ~ -! i\----~ ~ -I ii! ~ ~ ~ ~-"'" < .. ~~21" .~! ,,! ,'-....., :::~'l'''~- _
.. ,,~~.'" ..L ---, IT.'.... ,1 ----.h' ~ ---,,___ ,
. NO""'".."",. I ~!,..--' 'C:::~o'W-'.Il.a."".~./..l. . ~~ -4 '~":::J:_ '
~, '..-''', ~ \ ~ ....... ,~- . ~ -- _"'::"'->Il:..--'I'
.' ~ , ~ - -- - - - - - .~"" -~"",--""",-, f,.
~ '"""""""- .... .>- . -= - == = = = - --- ~ """"~,,;..,~ I 1-:<111
" --=- -~~~""'= == -,- '" '"'-"'=-""~'" "''i- Wdtl
~ " ..... - -~ ....: '--- =--.JIt- ~~-- .:;;;"""";f' --"'- ~~":<<"
II~--- ""'- - . 'i ;-n:-. ~=, - . _~ r '. '1.-,.. "
... -ii'--':~ ~$ 'OJ.,,!,, ;,,,, - -":: 11 ; I 0-: ... !.1
llf!;~f -::~... !"l~- - ,*-,"r " '!f1,ii, ,/~ ~ ..:s.. \ i _
i(~~)-':--'~.:. "'\S"'4", "'. ~. -:ir;.tJ -~~ ~-~~ >;:.i; -<-.1 ~-------- ],/ I;?, I
I" 1i!.c,t"'r;.L-,....~. ~WT..:c;:--x.'" --'::~^"!,---- 1.." &1,,' ~_ :::' ":
," 11 '1:."$ ~ -r",,:- " , \1 .';f'"-~ ~ :::: L
1c,"~ \~:;:i':~ ,,;, :::J~"-c - ~~:I!>~X\; ""5-~-::1. ~:::: ~~ r":
"": ". ~f"..w;"t ~-.... ~, ;-:\l~,: l:" _ r."
Y, ," - . - x~""""_.....;r_"-' '"' ~ '" ....... ~1'i~. _ ::::- _' I
I~. &~ ~"ii- '~~'S--::...,~ -.,...: --. ~\ / r )~ ~ ~ \
' I ' {.r:lt~~}'\'A~~U---r~:1.~;:;;'''1:.- --/'~ ..~~ . - i ~ . ~IlIU l~
I 'KIl1l1\~9:- ~~ ,,;:-':l\..,=-=---' 'I - ~_~, ,t""j ""m! '\ ;.}T(f~::::- ..(- ~ I 1\1\
~ d f') ,,;,"";1it: "; -ci;,;"<) l ~ i1\!:" - "", ' 'J .; T f; ., .' "" !!l!tIii'
{1;r/;~W~~ >-\...\t''''II-.ll'l h:~'Ii~ 1':b-. ii"~l'i)~~)~) .~~~ \irml~~1 !I~~
- \/1:V~/Iw-}E1j}.l . \ i "'~ ',,' ;:~ ! '.' i ' ..:' L....l ::--' ",' ~; I / ft
I-I l>1 ~XI'Y -5':?\\ !'.).... ".. "- \ / '" ,-'"""'= ,::::: _. .. {r'"':t ~
II~ ~t"/~~I '\\i--_..l-.--!-\..~~! ,'I,: ....,1 _.:t'_ ;?r!.if. " !1~1 - '.', i 1."Jf!! ~
~ ~/~. .-!--;:,'j · \'\' \\ -- ....~ ~ ~~; ==.C-:""!'''' rt. . .~l ~";..,I\l'~' !
'I,;'; ro""! \\\ . ,,,.."' :\ ""4'~;_ .~~ /1? ~~I.~~. I
d1~ 1~/~i' \\\ 'I ,rjl-.-, ~~ ~~'i~1 'fri"_4' i"~{ ~~ / ?: 'i i ~ !.~~f-t I!
'''''''! · \) /~ "'-<_I,ll, ~. - I 1~f:"Ii"l)", '.f-i'::: / '. . I ......-~.."-.h-. ....,\ I
I j t--;' i i' / ~~. "., "'" CI ! t. . ~! ~0'lill ~ 1.11', , ' . ~ ! /J... Zi ~......, ~ I~
,r-;:-'; fI'/~) ~ \ .1' /I/V)'!": t;, . I I~ Ii!}; Ii?,J '_ ~ " ,
~ ;/'!2IJ':':" ~ " ;!J '/'" ';i~.(9;~ i ,r ..' ;', )--" ~"! '~'. -._-4\/1,. ~ 'i r~- ~
-----I. /' ///, ,j,\ //,:, : " .~, '.<(".;.. I.! _ I
! i~ .11 /, fA. i lr;:; ~~;:Ir. / " .~v ~ _ ~v; i "Xl.
' ; It::'" '1' ~ /, . '" 'L ~'1!\ ,,' .,', ~ "",;; ;3~ I
:' i-if; ~ " ~!](>,i)YI/l\li:~ If~ '.Ofl~ =- ~/~ vA ~jl{~! :1
:1: ,. . ,;t/ ,'-'l-ll ::-j! ~ . r, ~"\.~,. / ~ii\' I
'I ../,.... . ~ ,,'" ~~""- ~- "!~ ',!;'!,~ _1'-----.1. / \.~"M
. Lid""'./ : All,'~ ~~ . '~_~~ ~/'jT',lj< ~
! ).!ll~" '. 0' . --:--.2 " " ,'-!. '//,;1 - iti .
r+~\t.J .!,~. ~1-'. ~ ~ , ,../i_.~ '.J---r~i'r?~ ii/II \ I~
.t- 7',.,,' <;,--2r , .' "" dl.;' ,'''' '\1 /11/ \ ;.-.
~ \ -". "i. "~ !". :!lO." . :::0- -S:::S '~'~/' ,,,,,IV /~-1' 't~:::: /1.1, ~
- ',..-<: '"f. I ~~.... .,..." / ' ;::;,,-- --~..H!.-'
::::-- ;")-'(l,--~.~l., ....,-) ;:;; ~!. ~~ ?l . -.... " r -I~"'J~';'}I:"-. . '::~~~~ 'j=;
I(~ i:L ., IB" ~~- '-':, 'i~' i ' ~;f~':;_/lf!"~~~~~~ /
I~ -----"l... ""~ " .0, r ///fr "--1-- _:;)j;'o , .
.' i : f' ~ 15 -~,. It/ __-~_=--~ __~~ ~"
'. ," ' l ~~~~:i '=. ~ l/" f~ :J:~O =-~- -'" ec ''l; 1:
I~,lj~" - ~!.' ~". -oS ~}",~A ., /;:;"'r..~~w. -rl'i'~?S ~\
I ~ ..J.-- '. ".:.:J '!\i~. ~~; 'I,ill--. ~f!' //:-., ., :\ 1 \'" ~ ~
..' ~'L ( ". '~!! J)I.I~; ~ '." -O'~ <<J' tfj(.:~)~'jl. Ji:X ':-i-~,\ :j~11 c -~...~ ~'<1-,V~ "
! '1":--' II. :!l(~ ~~.'>j/iYJf/J!rf/; . I _-. \ I ~~9'" ",'c"
! i : r'.', / I! ~~'> .:::-~ ~!/J'I/I; III I t /. ~ (~/ 'j" '- : 0 'le
i /: 'ii' iY ~- -S-~~ ~~1%'~1 I /;'/6"'~/1! '. 'C'v'=-< I
j I ,~ ..-::- "\' ~,. v ,~/jpk '" "'ll ".i;) I :
~: 11;~; ~- ..0"-::- ~~~ _-P/J;~?~%~/ k ,. ~ 9!. . /!f i:
! ~ I .;/.-: ("/ /, ;> J'itic~l'~ ''<c,
· - ..0 ~ /,-;:t:/,,. '/// /::: j."/: <i?l ~, '-
'- 'll'".... ///'.I> /.::; > . . II' /) :'0;
, c\ ", ~ v ""..v t' // #' ,:...: ," _ '. ,.-.......-::,. ~
.::::::':.::.
".
~!' . -..,,/ . / " -.:: I./,; ~ > J I ". ~ \
. ",,!..,-r .~/~~ :" 2:::.~, ,II/; 11/ /~ l^ {''''1 .,., /.. \
1\1.1: I If: ~~, "';'I;/J. I ~111 . H m l:e, ,,1,/ . ~ \
I~' , !" ( "') ~ , /0(i /.I:'~rll ~~ 1l-.1f-', ~, ^).
,2,' " . ,;' ~ '" "0')'( ~"I,I :1 , ,~ - ;i " y_~__-
/;fi;'{'~1~\J 'j i .\\.! ;~#'A-i/rjji' ..?;J ~~ ~L \
'1~'", '~ '", \~ ~,. fii ,,;/, ": \
~ ~ '.L" ~~~~::'::'I\' '!:..f'! ':'.::~ ..'. ' 'li'~0t) > 8 ~ I
~ ,. -- ...-....:~~, --;;'" z \
,; I -"'i'i )'..;'i'$~ d./ > :
"".CC:;,. / ~1 I _, "~I':1 /,~~. \
'., / ' VI. . \
v0/<" , __._.. II i ~\
'"""~;'; /I.~;'/''K' .. / ~~ Il \ ff ~\
O:;:s / <, Ih~ \:~ & . """ \\
/ ! !. '" ", \
\ ~ '" \
"" \
", \
"" <\ \
"" / l..." \
" I "<:t... I
"" / "-~'> \ i
" /,,~ \ I
............ I '..... \ .
"" / '\ i
", / "" ~
'I " I
...... / ......-...,,:
"" I
'\ /
V
,
I'll:: \1
lll"'~ ;1
!ll} J ~ll.~1
I~' [ t ~I
I! ~ ~~~I
" I ;;!m~
~w
~ j.i
\ I
I
./
~ ~ ~ '~l f
~ ~ ~ ~!j
1/1 ~ ;;:3-"'"
f~ ~ ~ ;I!}
~N ~ +[
~~ · W.
( 1>! "'~II"
f t !!"l"
. ;, h,l
I 8 Hil
~ Ifl
~ "
~ '
.
~
, ~
~
.
ij .
.
.
i~.
-I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ~
I ;
I J
I
_-1
I
~
,! ~ ~
I
-l '-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!f~~ll.i*'
f '~IHf
f" Ii" 'JI8-~'"
; ~ .l'~
. . ,."
1 ~ . ~. ~
Ii ; H~g:
I ,.<.
c f" g~$..
,f {is. 9..:"
;, .1.,
; B Hi!
~ f'-
,.~
I'~"l'l!l';'!fll'~'i!!!i'l ".. ~I
J~'fl 'll~ tr.~l! Ui-!!j !~i i
!~~~<!nbll..ihl~~!H~' l., f
, ,'n-"I -1""Hti'z< Z'If .
SI.Ill!l,HhS'",<~,i"l!~i"'l ~ ;;~~ 2.
i;lmUi~~"III;jf~fJlh 'il ~
[Ui,"'IP'-JI...,I', v.' · c ~
9"" ~lI.a '" 9" ~ n 1I :l. '"
.!;;~i "f.~IJiiii~i!['[1 !~; "
1!:a:!OI5'P!;.'lj'"'. 1;~_-!l~:l2. :>'~f.e
a:rl~l!;~g!ti-.!8i~Jlt":nll:f r
li";~;~f'~"~~'I;;~8'1; ~g~
-'I'."l-<"'" :1;,' [ 'I
1 !i~i3f:s: !r~!. l:li2..!. .
o!'I'l..lj-'J!II'1...f. i~.
,." "l' ;""l<pf [.~
'f~fl'I~~~~ [~filr -i~ .f,
!,t'~h:~l.j'''-~~'h.l~h .~~
,(IF~<!~i'~i!lqiH'i IH
,'!ft!i,.,.~'z..l.:~.f; .~
. 'II. . U!>J'~ ~'". J- f ,~
l..h "'~.h;l~n'Io ~!
!l.1"'''' ! &!l:~~'h. ,jr' Pi
i. ~..:>. g
/
/
/ b
/ ~ /
a;~ r~
~ .. ~ ...... ,:ctx- / ~ /
.. ~ vl,...,rJ.'''~
~d ud ~ ~ H .~r j!iJ~~ 1m H Urmtm E · ,-",:t;;o /.," /
l' ... ! l -" I ;f~iI~ ~l" .! t,th;f !H / '..;'R-'1~0:s
!f [l; ~! f~ h i'f-i1.j fii~ t~ ;!ild-h~1 9 · /
.. . l'.a ~~! -~ .', l" ~ f~lli It I
[[ ~ ! i ~f~; ~!i~{f l~!i .~ "ii I fl~~ ~~~~.II'R~~~~~~~~~;ii !~t'~~~~;~.i"I~~~~...."~'~~li"1<t~.'..~~2.<.~"'~"i.~Rga~~Q.~i~'~
{ f z tt~; ,!!HH [!It'~ "Ml~!f .
~ !!"j;~ !~~~i i!fi ~~ i!iiii!!i IlfllJIIllllJJJIIJJJJ JJIJIIIIJllJIJJJllfJllJJlllJJJJIJlfJJJllJJJJllJJJllJl1IIJIIIJJJJ ~
!I-! i t;11: iih : !'jft~it Uni~JHJflHU!m ~ll~jfti'~lmijnml!:lmiij:nHUmm!m:lmHUHl~~lji
~ f l~if )I.! ~ 1:;lr:l.r ,li!II'IH,',H.I~ I rd' h .rlll,HIIIII?bl fill-'~j!' II, II H':'U ;f~flfil
il - HrH It: i a.l~~~!r~' II I · I i IIp! I! i I ~f ii i f in h;
~ 1" Ii ;' i ;h I~ i ,I :. I 'I 'J
I
I
I
I
/
~;
"
'0
~;
"
~
"
~ .
.
QI I
~hl~'
i. ~ ~~~I
) {I m~
~ lp
~ Iii I
I
I~; I'; I~; Ii; ;
f!: f!: f,: f~' ~
Iii. lj .S.lj .~f
5~ { ~ r ~~{ ~;~
tl}S, ll: ~ ~s'a ~i1!l.
0C0' ~ ~ ~t[ u!
.~ f ~: I'}
It ; !1 !l
[I i ~! ![
. . .
P" 3 S. i!
t i , t
t ;
r.
SITE/BUILDING PLANS
.
.
.
i i I
II
I'
Ii
I! I
.: I
i I I
,i I' i
" I
! i
,
in ~ ~
~ "'
~ ~
"
~
, I,
.
,~: I~~I~ H,~,~!~ I .'
lil:~I~~I~iil~I~~ ... ~I
i~l uHUU
11~11~~~~~~~l~1 i
'II ,I! !I!,! ~I~,!I! "II' I
'I i I li'll
fl.l--~~ III" I I I!
_ -f--I-- ___f!-!;.I.~.~I. ~,--i !~;
I ! ,: - ~-:--" · - · --
, I I' ,'. ,'.'="'""'~
, I' I" ,,~
II I' ' "
'i ili Ii. I I'i,. .1
I . III I' '+T -' ' ,I
'~'I" " 'I' J-I; '. " , ' , .
i I ,I: .III,llllitc-" ~,I+i'I' '
I: : I!:': I I:! : I
I', ,III,: '1'1 I ,I
i' ',II i: I' I I] I
I I!: III' II Iii i
II1I ' III i i
II:' I" I
i I II i I' i !
I :" "
I II II II
I' "!
t ~~ :['1 ~!'l;I <~ I", -- --- .c::
.",' " ' I ' " "I' , 1",
:" 9:;:. P- ~ 4 ~ II " I ;0
~ ~'1 I I ~ ;i' ~ ,:': ;i; : !~
~ :;0 ! 8 ~ ~:~ i :;d ,
\I' ", r--;<l ()! Ie "'2~'.1!
F, 2;" ,: I --:;<! i -----!~ ~I!'!~~~
, Q, I I "c' I""
,_, :-:fi I I 'C': ~ ~ ~:;;~
.' "", I ". I ,.,
"';.II,,"'Q,"',_~m ,.
",;: I '. ,.", I {~" ,'" ti::u I
" I' '"~ I
i' ..- "_,,JIttB',
$~ '~ j 1 I:' ,~
g~ f? I : L 0:
,,! . 101 'I"' .j'" ~."O
; , I ~ ", "I"~
~ ~::u
, I <~ ';1
~ ~ g:t ,_ _, - I
! \j; ~
~~~
J__
'''' "Q
I'" ~
b ~
!d ~
, 11
(;:: t1
Il g ~
, :z >'
I
~
ti3
~
~
~
~
~
~~i~I:~ ' ;;l~~~ 2l (j
~~r: I ~ ~o ~ a i!d _.
~ ".~ I q.~" ~ . ~~ I ~ n ~Tr
~~"~III ' U~~i ~ *,~ ~ is n i II ~
'I 21' .~~< ~ ~
't,,<!z I ., I~ f~~ 1~!i '
"l~ I ~l !i , ~I~
" OJ
,. . 0
. ~l
" ''; ~
8 I ! ~
I~ 81 .
I
" Z ~Wi~; ~Ti~
I~ ~ ~~;:J~ 0 ' ;m~1
!@ ~ ~I~~~ ~~ .
'0 ii;~! ~
1m ~ ~dg ~~~~I
1-
~ ! F
Pm"' ~ii !il I~ ~ ~
~ ,,..
, ~ ~:~ ~
, -'
1:! ~~
;'
,..
8
I ~
I, ~ I' ~
~ I" -I; ~,
I; i~ "U
. , OJ
, ' f 000
. i i c...I
~ I ' ,. II mm
! ~ I~'~ i:i ~~
, ~ ~ i~l~ I 02
I I~ )>0
..,m
)>x
.
15
~-c
~ i;;
"'s::~
2'jo;;J
o~i;l
zOz
~
~
~~
~
~
~ ~~ 5 @
~ :~ ~ --3
~ y;~ s (j
~ >~
o ~~
~ ~t:;O
t"" >, (l
~
~~
~~
~
~
.
I~ A
~ ~~
;.;'"' ~("l
.t;; ~
z
~
~~ 5 n
fii'F:r 73)> -
;~~~ ~Q }>
~~~l ~~ -i
~~~~ ~Cl ITl
.... "'VI VI
,
r;:S
w
;-p.
~.fj
OI
'=1
m
()
--1
c:
:JJ
I)>
:r
'(f)
1=1
1m
'"
Ir
')>
iz
I
:~
~
~
~
.
.
L -----=-=--==~~, ~EE-N-.-/!5;)A_D~__".._
- ---.- . u" SAN D "'v,.,, "
' -----=~ - - ~~-~, "',- I
'~"" ~
I
, --::;"----"--r--
I :=TiUI1 j
Ii! I j -
I 'I 11/\
j
i i i I I
I : 1 I ~ ~
I. ,+___L
I 1''' 1
I i j 1'1~',,]
i ' i III'~-
I : I,
i i i III!;
I I :;
I 1 i tl!
I it :
I ~ i
i 1 it i''''
'I t i IYf --:-----L,,;---:'7@;!
:t '-r-",r-- / ,,' 1_ -.. 'j r::E::
' ~;: ,'(jCf!! I;;:'
It,; /~/;/ Iii!! i F
i ~ I ,pi; r
i ~ II U, \i iil
i i LI' /1 \
i i I
\ :ii l! I
i III I
,ir-\~-I-
I 1'1, I
! I
i i i I
I i \
I I I
I, i i I w
ii, 111 ]I IIII
! I :~ I !'wlt j \:~~~
' '6.,
is Ir
Ii I
III
!:- I~
~ I,
I
iE
''" [1:;1
ili ,;:1'!~
ig!~,~ .....
//
~ ."I"~.'i
""i'lW'J
~Q~~t
-"1;",,,,
"~1'
~~
--~,
I I I
/
,
I
! I q,/
i.,'
-p.
:JJ
()
I
~~
m--1
"c:
r:JJ
)>)>
zr
,/
n
,I:
, ,
!l-~~,
II
,
./
"
/'-:':,/,
I /
I,
~=n'
~~, i
~j~u-!, }il
. I /1/.
, //..['/"-
==ii/i'
------i'll, ////
. --'1. 1/; ,
\ ~. /
\l::-~ !
I nn I
I
F
&~
..
"
I'T
II;T, .
~ ,~
>';-:1 //
;/,
-,~
'.
.-.,,0'
//
s..=.=."
\
,
"-,
'\
,I
,
\",
----- -...,
II
'6
\
Iii I i '.1
----.:-l LJ.L
,--
/.../
,.
I;
;/
/ ~\
,~ \~ \.-0\\
liD / ///',::;/j--
",,0: ': //
.oi~Y
IVV. ;/
"",/ ./C____
..."\(/ ---c.:/<>>-~
~\\' //'
-~
---_//
.
\\ '\~:I./::-:::::-/'-
)/::'1'
/,
.::::':'-'\, \ \
f \ ';..
/; I'. \
-\ ;/. ,
.. \ \ /1 ,\..\\
' \ \ \ J I I I
1\)/ f\\
)." ;; \;
/~>.,\ I; \\
//'~ /; 'II
I II
/, d0 \~\
//~ \\ \. '....
" /0 \~\~ ' ........""
Ii / ~~~;; ---'---.
" //)A >~ ". ".
"~ ~ """
---.
';;;....
..
,
..
\
\
/
/'
;'
;"=-.....
\
'.\
\
,)
,
,
:,/
I.
"
I
"i/ / ,/
~~\,\
I] ',\
"~'''I
"y/
. '---. ,/
, v
//
"
'I
~.--=- - -"0,'-.,
,
I
'I
,.
(I
\~\
\
"
"'-
"
"'-
\~
\
M;;~ ~~~ 5
~;~ ~~'" rrt
~~~ ~~~.
!~! 11,
~~~ ~~~i
'I! ,':
t3r,', ~~.;
~'il':: ~;1~
"~I 'll'.1
~~ I;
f~ ~
//--
II
//
--_/' //
--=-.-=:-=~--=--- -=------
Ii
-rr
1/
II
//
//
/i
//
,I
//
/;1
"
"
Ii
I,
/I
/I
//
/;
//
/i
"
.',
/L
.c:.::::::::::cc::::.:::====c=::-=::=-=- I r--
::r:
o
~~
~::::'"
~o~
O~f:;i
z~~
~
Ihi
~~ ~
~
~
~* ~
~ri 0;;-
",!:i~ [l: Q
~i~f ~ ~
.."i - ~
.:. 't:~ ;l:I '-I
~ 8;; ...... .....
,;
//
//
-----==----::::>-
.j
I,
1/
II
I
//
i/
l>
~
.J
.
.
'..
-
.
"'"T1
~-
11':::0
-'00
9-1
"T1
r
o
o
:lJ
"
I,;
Z
)>
:lJ
m
)>
J:i
10
,
.
,
!$
[1--1 (1'..-'" -
! I o/:;:~
f I Di\f~
II , ,\
U /\ ~ i
<;J IiIf
__ ~(~ ~lf
~lt<:!!
"rJ
i["":"_
~i ;;;
<;EE"",""''''
_ <C><CC>ITl;\)ATI<>J~
H~T"",INE
~ i~~ I~ !~ !~. ~ 15
" :;:: ,.
I ..: " ""T1 ~~~ i~ n~ ~
i I D I,;;;'i
> OJ Z ~
i ~ zoo ~ 0
)>-1 n:;::", ~~
ii' $ ~ol ~i ~
tv is n
:lJ"T1 ~ -
. ~ g;r o~ ~,~ '". 0;;-
\.0 ;~ I~ ~ )>8 ~ I~~ mn ,.
zo p1f ~~ -<
" I ' ~-
~ Q" ,8 _:lJ i z~
~ :Ii: ,ti 1'5 ,!~ mn m
" ~o1 ~
.
e
.
,
~.,.,
~-
11';::0
-o(fJ
q~
.,.,
r
o
o
;0
-0
>
Z
)>
;0
m
)>
oj
1:1
sw
nl'li'
i~
". ~\
,
"""""'0:;, t-
>QRC(:>)l.'''lJ"''
HAl,."L'"
~~
I
I
I
!
'I'
W
T
,
.u~~"..~ t
iJ -------.---..,@ ,
.:i
..,~
a
v
4j:> , :1
''" i :
4:h.',.-.-..!
'''''-'(::): ;
&L_
~JI
',.'
ail
I !
iC!:J
~
--G
----------8
--@
r,"! 'I
~Bj' I -~-
(..;.~
'In
'B
I,S,
------- -------8
-- -----T----1----
--------@
0.'1
11-:
\,-.. I
1--
,
I
,
@
8
I
,
I
,
~
-----------8
I
,
1--1
,
~
~ I' I~ III " 6 f'i ,.
" -0.,., ~ffi~ ~~ ~
> I D >::0 ~~ ". ~
i i* 'l
~ Z(fJ no::.. ~~ ~ 0
N )>~ "'o~ a n
3 0
;0"" ;~" ~
........ ~ ~5 ~~ .::;: o;!,> ,.
~i~ ~ " mn
C> 'T -0 -. ~ " ---<
~ l ~ ~ "1;0 " ~~
81~,~ ~ :1~ mQ m
~~ ~~ ~ .J
.
.
.
_\
"'-(J)
r;rm
~(J
60
'Z
o
"
r
o
o
;:0
-e
r;;
Z
>
;:0
m
>
~
1:
~w
eeE~ETA1,~
_ """"","T1"'.t""~
I-.\T~Ll>.E
~ r Ii' (J) S ~ ".
:" ",;', '8 -em ~ffi~ I; ~
;p- I '" 0 r;;8 ('J~ ~
" Z
I ZZ ~
I ~ g~~ ~Cl m 0
t--...) >0 "- ~
I ~o t;:J2i ~~ <; n
;:0" "'lli'!t' ;~ -
.......... I I~ ~5 Q~~ "'n ~~~ ".
.! [ ! -0 2:0 ~ m !BQ --i
.......... ;,: " l>:;:o ~ ~;;j
~ I~ -~ "1' 519 '"
8~ ~
.
.
-
c
:i!(J)
lI.m
-0
60
'Z
o
'11
r
8
;0
"
s:;
Z
)>
;0
m
)>
oj
1:
i~
,
t--~~-~~fl
~_ ('I
."'0
8 ----- -
0--
V--
@-~
@
8
(-'.
'--1
-----------:J
6I'E""'E'~I.11 ~
,",,"<;'<>"H;~-''''
- -
,,~,~c""
-
'[\,51 [<v/I
,1, ,t.
r"'- 1"\1 /..\
I
~b
i'
;0 v:
--------------@ il
(1) ----------'---@ ,
$
Gl
,,~
Ii)
- - -----8
------------G
_n________--@
i
~!'i
!Cj)
,
--0
--,-------------@
(;:1
en
I
,
In- ---1-.--L-----------
,
~
-8
I}:
-'(;)""'
,
ck
/~ I
Ir'.!
@'" c
(~~~: (~"
G
@
e
m ! i~'g if ! I ~ Ul 6 ~ )>
, "m ~~ ~~ ~
> I s:;8 ("l~ ~
I ~ z
! ZZ ;;l 0
~ I )>0 m~i ~z ~~ ^" ~ ,.,
210 g 5
. ; I ~ ;0'11 ~~ -
I" i[! ~5 o~ ~.E i!ri )>
........ :>On ~~~ -~
~ -0 Zo ~ i~f ,,~ --<
g:o !.z Ol;o ~ i!~ ~~ m
S i::;: I~ ~9
" ~ .J
.
.
.
~
oO-i
~;;
--<;u
90
"Tl
r
o
o
;U
"U
s;:
Z
)>
;U
~
~
1:1
~~
'., --T""
1IJ!~I''':i1!
["'I
1311
I ,I I
i .
~
'Ia.
'i'-,
i. ~ I;,'
~Il{
" .
r"~
v-.~ \~,._<)
I '
~ -!1
--, r>---~~)
]~~ I~ )
<?--"/ <....';.1
~-jj
I/--CY
t6
t
,
II
i
1,._1 c~
'7--<')
(,. J
iilll
fy
\~--j
I
~
","O>"";;'b }-
_ """,.0""""""'"
M.lf""l."~
I \~/ i
. Ie I~ I' I' I ! ~ ' 5 )>
e I" ~~. ~ ,~ 0' A
~ "U-i ffi>c ~I ~
> I~ s;:;!; ~ ~ ~~ z ~
i II r z;U ~ 0
tv )>0 m~1 " ~
~~ (5 n
;U"Tl ~~ ?' ~ -
~ ~5 i'r~ o~
f--'- ~d :>'n ~H )>
I 'I mn
V.J :~ '~! )>0 ~ ,.~ ~~ -<
~ ~.~ I .;U ~ Ih ~~ m
mQ
,,~ ~ .J
.
it
.
c
"..,
~~
--0;0
90
"1'1
r
o
o
;0
1:J
);:
z
:!Ii
~
oi
1:
~w
o
'(~h.-
y
@
-0
~~!
51',"'",'''.''
FCfOWN:NJAlION
-
w-
f"-'
~ ~j
_.~-- - ---~; ~ ~---~
j
;]
::
~
~u
0-
i:\
1!I'1
I
7;;-
~J
Tr~
-=--==------:-==~
--- .----------@
@
'r ~
l
;!~'
I"
:1
.---------.. --.- @
:fl',
'181
--
I
,
1 . -L--'-----
, , ,
~ ~ ~
------G
L
,
~
(0
l\l
;r-1j
l '
I
~ ~ 0
"" ('\.,0
I.;. ~V
,
b1
e ' I~ I' 11 ~ 5 ~ "
0 1:J.., ~ffi~ ~~ ~
.
> 0 );:~ ~i ~
ii' " z
~ z;o nii:: ~ 0
tv I i )>0 m~ ~a ~
, I I ~o~ 15 n
, I I' 'I ;0"1'1 ? ;~ -
~ ~5 ~~ ~~ c,
....... I~ II~ i '"~ ~~ m~ )>
.+;;.. -0 ~~ ~I --<
i~ ,010: I 01;0 ~i ~L;j m
<Jl:::i (), ~ -< ~9 ~
.
.
.
~
I'
I'
,I
I
~
"-"
iO II m ,
~c
6;0 ,
,
'-l r--J .J
I
"
r-
0 ,
0 I
;0 ,
I'
" II
s;: "
Z l
)>
;0
~
~
~~
,
I
I:
e
,
~$
i;! Ilj--
1;
, ,
I, ,
1 I
41
t
~
, '~
~'-
o
.
81
,"=,~
~
~~Il
1==1 [;c~~1
..
,.
,
,
,
,
, " e:'\.{W' 00'
'_.: I'f!
" , '1
'" '~',' ;
1lI!.J ~I!'\'-pl! <,
,
I!ll!
[!]!!
I "'
--
--,
eEE~EfTAl,\; }
'""rr.HTNl.''''''
-
HATCHI.t<E
~A
-
Q,"" -~
: \':!l'
:;:i1'
Q.0 (,;,
~ "i"j" " ~ ~ J>
~ !--~ f~ _~ ,,0 f;l~~ I~ ~
> I s;:!:ij ~I ~ ~
I ,
I Z-l g~~ m 0
t-..,) , )>I '- ~
i ~O -, 5 n
i ;0" f' ~ -
~5 O~~ ~~ r, O~
........ , :>'(') $H J>
I : mn
Vl I", ir- )>0 2:0 ~ ~!l ~~ --<
Ii ~ i~ ~ ~-
_;0 ':'~t:l z~ m
I ill mn
I O:~ ~
.
.
-
I!
@-
~
~--
4>--u
(0
,
,
,
. ,
,
~>-. l;]ll ~ "
>
- -
~II
J ~il
lit [lJ1!
I!JII
!ill!
, I'
) &:. [1]11
-
~~"1,;",,,
+-j -
,
,
, ,
,-"
c-
,
,
,
c
~"'Tl
11,0
~c I
6::0
'---I .~.
:I:
"
r-
0
0
::0
-0 ,-
I! ,
t~ I!
'~ I
::0
~ w+
".
~ L_
(I)
HM,,"l.-I~
\~---
0------[
';;';"\ I
'W
I!l('
~~
~.,
':J
e7~_
"'"i 1
I 1
1
I",. i :
b~"'7
,',I i
I'll
!
I
.~ II' i .~,
-1-
~
--+-'T'
~Cff I ! i ",Cff
m_.......... I ;._
'jj,-\-
I I I
I ' I
II:, I"
" I I
,I I'
~r---~\
" \,
v
I
f5
, .
~$
! I,
11 !! jli!'
~'"! ,", ,Ill
~;:, 41 ~ ' -
~C'< "
8 8Cl;:;~
~ -f9!:;
, , ~
,
8
. 1/' , :~ " :5 s:: )>
a !8 -00 ~~~ n ~~ ~
> 0 !;~ z VI
'l
,~ Z---I gS::i ;;l 0
N ".:1: ^. ~
210 :'i l' 0 n
::0" ~
'C. 0;;- -
"'"""" I I ~ ~5 o~ i"() i~~ )>
~n
0'\ -0 2:0 >0 ~ ,!{ "'~ -<
Ie I ,E lll::o ~ ,,~
!t;; I_J: "~l Zm m
;8; ~!~ l~ ~9 ~
-.J
.
.
'e
~
~i~
1I"lm
-'(I)
QI~
I~
1m
]:0
,0
;:IJ
,m
,
'm
'<
:t>
:--1
'0
Iz
. ~~ ~~
il ~i
~f, ~
f
B ,
B"j[]j]])!
D
. J
E
i
"
::I":
j:':
"'-m
'l>
~ICD
b!--t
"m
x
ril
Ig
IfIJ
I~
,0
iz
Q'\
v
~'cn
'io
b~
'I
m
Ii
I~
"
I~
,:t>
,:j
10
'z
:."~
~.n;
!i
I ~
\,)
~~
",
~r
,8~ "
~i'
'-:;0
BI~
"Ii
i
'""I'"
"
Q2
<>:;:
IS
if
'--'()
"II:
"0
-R
+
!;
,I
"
!l
I
II
II
II
II
l!-
II
II
ir
II
II
II
II
~
il'l
~,~i~e
'i'm;~"
ill!
'~o:~~
i '~
\'\
\ \
\
I
2
!
~ ~
i i
~ "
, ,
I' ,
~,
, ,
n
II
II
II
II
r':
l'~
S~
?"~
~~
"~~, m"
n '1"
'O'~ ~: ~
,T ,r
:", 0,.-
-< "m
1" ~
i
l' ;i.
'~
1~(
~ dl<fe_
~ ;;~,
, "1~8
~ '1,1!
'I ~
,'II \
.\1\
: ~'::\
~
~
~
rn
m
,
mm
~~
::Jm
022
zO
(I):JJ
II
n
'l
~
~
~ I;
,
I
I I
I i
I" Ie
ii"
'0 <
,,,,i:' ()
:t
o
~ffi~
t"l;;::",
~o~
oE~
20Z
i
:>>
~ ;
~~ ~@
~~ t"l
" ~
~
z ~
;ri 0
~~ ~ n
i!'~1 ;J:l ~ -
s:~~ ~~ ):-
-"{ G1::!: -t
ih ~~ ~
.J
"
(~
.
.
"-
Signage Plan - N/ A no changes being made to current signage
(e
.
.
...
LANDSCAPE
UTILITYIDRAINAGE
PLANS
.
'.
.'
: ~ i
88 \-'\"
~,\,..'
iQf-n
l-
1---
~ - ,
"r ::'
,
5)> j
'z
<'lo "
\
rJl 1 ._1
()
)>
'1l
m J/
,'1l
,'; i
z ,
,
:'
..
:)
'. '......'.'..'..'. '~.) .. ~.:=...:.
.. .'.Cr-~'~
!..O"':'0:-<;:J~C;1
/i<</0':::;~=-~: I =
I,(~l?i~r .'.':1.
.1 01 '", c.
'" <b' ,,,
, ",<, \,
" "'1 \ /
{i'ltl~; Y
..,...I.lltt) )
I 16 "!
..,6. j I
Ilml /
i rnl()
I!! I
I'P, '
'01
"1
.p.,
II~
II'
il;
10
r
:t>
^
m
"
L. ___
c...
o
I
:t>
Z
Z
:t>
.
!
\~u
\. \r
t-
!
./
/
r
!
I
I
'.
\
\,
\
I
I
I
I
\
\
'.
,
"
../'.
aJ
,-
<
(J
"f
~"-- -----
\
!
\
,------------1
L=-~-=_
!$
(~D
\1.0.' I
\ I I
,Q:i/
__~_.J
(,..JJ}
,
!
t~~ -l
I--~-
I (,.J:)
--r----------
"_ t .~__.
\-
~ II
~ III
i if i~
Ii I~ I~ I~
, I
I
;
II
I'
r
)>
z
o
rJl
~
m
'1l
r
)>
Z
:I:
o
~ffi~
~s~
o~E'
:ZOz
~
~
~; ~~
~;; ~
~.E ~
~
I
~
l'
l>
'"
z '"
;;: 0
~
(5 "
:;l> -
~Q l>
~~ ---<
Zm m
;:Q '"
~~ .1
~ :~ I.; :~' i~'
.
ce
----
.
'~
- - - - T - - - - --;:- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --:.::. -~W:Li<G"~-- - - - - - - - - -----;;--,- - -- - - - - -- - -~-:::.
-"---"-~-=--=-:=--==-:_::,AS , S"'N 5 :,;'~:~!:~::r!::lft.;~ SAN~ "_ .,~ . __
"~ lIN( 0.- THE S~ 1/. OF st:C. J~ \- I' r I; ',I ,-, 'I ,
J e-H-A-N-N* -~ - - - -'~ - - - - -I ~;C:::;;,-
mmm~Wl~!mml ',~ TNH ELEV=9
==:-~ 12"D.'p.W_
.,.,..-.>-.- ~',-.
't/OH7 vc;r-{,,-'., __~
-- ~-
~.
.,->~::~
------',--. -, '-,---
----.
------
fl~~~.....'~~l" . i
. .... ~~~
.. .. i, . '" ~
. .. ~'.;\
. . ,~
c\-'\-\TTlllT:~FlFLJ
\ \ \ I I
, '
~
en
;:j
~
\)
~
....
:;:l
~
en
Ro
~
6
;::;
~
'<:
. , '. '. \, \ 1(\ IJjJJ:, 1JlL1:' "n.'I"I'
\ ' \ I I I V ".' '
" \ \ \ \ I u~ - -' ,'-.
\ \ \ \ I ' ,I
;/::~\ ......... ...
II --'. \~_
II \;
._l .~
/ iF
\~ !~. ,r'
~) /(1 rJ ~.
"I ( ,<',
~/Ii '.
==Y.: II"
, II
,
(
~
~ ~ ~
,~ ~ I U ~~ ~
i!l~ 6 ,
." - r
;~
o' I
:>:~
'0 i .
,- -t. '-
O~ , 0 0 0 . .
~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f ,
~ .
~S , , ~ ~ ~
~ C "
~ . . ~ 1
~ ~ ~ ,
. . ~
~ , , ~
,
, . ~
~
~ Q; 8 ~ ~
;;; ~ ~ ~ 8
'^. ~ ~ E
q ~ S ~
. _ 0
~ ~~
, ,
~
~
(J
ffi-
~
,
~- ~
. ,. ~ g
! IUi
A .!i"i'st;\
~ l~Jl~
"P
.+;
i :~!i
"
o
~ ~
hilI d
z~ ~~ ~
~
! i
f! j
I ! ~
~i'.;:!
I! I
ii
~
-> ~
#1 ~. 0
J~ i ~ (4
lJ11 ~~ ~
;11; r ~
.
.
It
~- --:-:,',- - - - -; - - ----: - - ~ - - ~ - -~! - - -:;--,-, - - -;;-:: -,;' -~~~;~;;:i- - ~~~ ~ - u;- ~,~ -;;'7,~ - - - -,; -:;- ~!- - n,~
'I __. ,~ _ .!",:,ESTWIEOfT~ESSIj40FSE:C,3J "\, I~(-ru'-, "',1:,
- - - - T- - -- - - -r - - - y - -'= *!<-E- -,. - J Gi-I-A-N-N,A- -'" - - T;:J-I:!-.j.t 9-:,- - --,.----;-,' --- -- ':r- -"- -: ,- - -"
~ --' ;, (8ENChhlARK 112 ~ ::?... ~ :; :~~a;;~ :; - r: :; '\ ..., ~ I 8ENCHMARK
~..~~t':;r.;~"~~':;~:~~:~f)~:2:~:~~~.:::'.-::~~~c-:1'11~,ii'~1i~
;<~ rI ",,~ ,.", '>,'
<~ "",
',' "~",
. <,~.
~
~
Ro
~
o
~
~
\)
~
;;j
~
~
~
~;~\~TTll-~\ ;"i
\ \ I I, \ I I l
" \ \
{t
,
,
-
~'
~ :~
:"',\
~': ':') t
"j'
~. .,<f
~' !}I
," ,,'"
/ \."p'"
;-?
.,(-~ .'
" " c , ~
0- 11 U I I , ~ ~
I ~ ,
t\ 11 !' I ,
'I l
"" i ! II.--~ 'f'!
!'< .,
f! ' . I
ri1 ~ t"""",."",,,,, l' , ~ .."
z I ' ' ,.', i .
" 1 I '" I ~
m i'-
C,"'i0, \ , ~ If ~ ~ 'I f ,
0 ~ ~..U ~ , ' I' . ---" .
j l 1i 0 ~ I
! @ ~ ~ , ~ a a j ,
ij! JJ WI',! p , ! , I n ,
'Ii '11,l" f i , I .1
". . 't' .I , , ,
" -=.-, i'I[11; ,
I' " , I
" 'I. !
" 1
"
!
~ l-~ !II ,
-~" ;:: i -> ~
m I~ n~ Ii ~I ~" 0
(J .~"!i ~. r 0
~~\il 1[1 i'll! ~ a
IN i~:'!l ~;:: ~~ d~ + n
;j! iil: r
~~~ ~~ ~~ r-o
g, i~ 1,1 ~
I )1:- ~ ~~ ~ pi ~
:g ,,~; > ~ E ~ ,Ii m
~ 0
.
'.
e
-"'-"
~
,
- - - - i - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~- - - - - - - - - -1'1fl'!'''- _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ ___ _\_ _ ____ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
- ~~S CAS 'rl'P-t-l"" CAS
. '" v SAN S ' . .::sr;a'N.c,"a..,O.., 'AN 'i " . 'iAN 'i_
\ 01"''',0 \
I (i,.,
' ~ _ . rC~T ,INE or THE SE 1/; Of SEC. ~J ~
--h-t- - - - ------- - --I::. *KE- --Je-H-A-N-N*-~--i::H:f.v-~U_---h___'-;-U___I____
~ rBENCHM ARK #2 '1...... -;, ~ij.1il """'" \, 8,C'HCH"M,'V'__'"
g \ TNH ELEV=924.C4 FEET _ '" ~
"\ .~~ \ 1::
J"DIPlI'
oliL/OOr-
~,~...liC ,~_:.....
:.=,. 70'-;:
-:r-+-"
1[/DHlucr
=:L~J2"OIP2'_
-.
,
~ .,----
'-.?~~=---,,~
..
--------
, "
, ,
;,-;
~
--~~."
.-.,."
',,\
~, I
!ITTi \
\ \ \ " I,
',"',".';'.,',"'."",'\"
p'-'-,. -. "
'. '-",' "."'r.
:_ ..i r,
~ ',.\1 ':
rTTl1iRFL:)
. ,
" \ \ \ I,
\\\ \~ "
--e-
/
/~~\
/).~
( Il~ \
~~ ;?
'\ II
/1 II
/11..,
----d:''' II,
~~ ,. - Ii"
II
II
II
\%WJ
II~;
--..)
u
U. /'''', ~~
/. ',1$
','" -'f '. ~~
"', '\,<
)"'i,:.
"i ..,:'(-
", , r-
., '.~,
. "" .
I
'''' I
.......4'
s
;~ v ~
..
..
. . . , ;::;
~
.
:.\
lli ~~ '?
~ H H '@
<: t ,- ,.
~ i., ~: ~HH"
~ ~j :~ p~,~~
~ ~i r~ ~~"~i
~ ~. "f I, ~ ,
I;": 1-'0>
~ i.! ~~ 2E~,;~
S !J 1':: ~~~~~
~ ~: !! ;~, ~~
;;; ~.a. ~... '" '\ ~.;
~~i~:~ m
.~ . ~
PI I
I
~
,
"
- ~
~3" ":r 2~ ~"
\Ii ~ i'~ .-<. ~ ~
h~ ~~~~r~
H ,;,p~
3ii ~..~~h
~! r~~iH
""'I "
" , ,"
oli<:itJ!{
H:hii!
.".'1.'
I ... I'
iii ~A~.
1~1" ~
z ~
@ t I j t I ~
1l~ I f
I
,
,
,
,
~
i
.
~
~
.
.
~
I
~
,~
I' 0
i
;
f
.
~
1
,
"f. '-
.
~
I
,
i
,
,
~
;..,
,
!
~
!
.
"
,
~
.
~
!
.
.
,
"
.
~
~
1-
,","'~-
'~<'
,~,~
.~~~I;J
~~';lS
~!iI~l
",I;
~<;I.,,7i
~r.~
"
L;.
',:
"
t.
:l:
~~~
~~~
~Cl~
~
il::
I'll
~.~ ~
~
Ii
1~~
d~
f!~
g i
,
-> ~
'I ~ ~ ~
11~i ~& ~
III: r ~
(J
ffiW
~
,
, - , ~
g,n;;~ :g;
"
'.
.
-
Q-
::;!
:l1
Q
;!i
J~
:::' '"
B~ i ~ ~
;~ ~ ~ ~
~~ E ~ :
.3p ,", ~ Q
'" ~ ~ ~
j ~: ;
a ~ ~
~
~
~
,..
~
~
z
"
@
Z
~
Z
"
iIo
;;
o
z
"
~
i
C$ il
~ ;I 0';1 ~~":
^~ IH;
<-
t~ 'I!l
~ I 11
e;
~ ~ 5~
1,1'
~ I' ! i
'" dl
~ :ts * i , \
" ,
Iii ,
JL:
;!t: ;t
r'
-) \
IPi
,
__,~D,~"...
s:
d
~
~
~ '~~li 10 :t: ~ -l> ..
S!~!, !], ~ ~ ri ~I ~" 0
(J ~ ~. "1~~ ;~ hi I~ n~ "i J" ~ 0
, ~~M".l I" ~~II g Q
, .,,1' ~@ I I B ~
ffi+:>- , "r Illi C~
'. , )>~ -
H !" ih ..
. , ".. ~ ~Cl ~ nq
i i~ ,i~l ~~i ! , ~
" ~ oil
:
_, !":ESTLlNEOfHIESEIj+OFSEC.J3
~ *K-~ - - - J e-H-A-N-N*---- t:H::f -j.t ~--- -- - - - - - - - - - - - -1----
c;_.;;__q__-,,\::~, I:r :--
;';',- ">
,,~
" ,~,,~
--~~. ~, .-
^",,-.<.
'""~
~.
f~. i,
0:'1/,,' l
~~/ "1':"- '\ ~
V:'i0I,.."",.,.,'"',.".,\,,,.,',,1
~"""'G;.:.
.;
..~ ~
'> ~'" ;
"
I D I I ,
~
i .
~ ~ ~ . "t, ---
f "
.
i , ~ ~ "
. t "
! , I
,
~ ,
~
-
.
.
Planning Commission Meeting
July 6, 2005
Attachment 3a - 3
{e",?-RS /.-
".~~"/I/-,,.
:- -- :::
:,.:.... ":;
~ ,~
"/ ... '"'--
PRESBy-rERIANl
!:10IV1ES & SER~~J
Senior communities
designed with the hand
a.rimee, a heart
fir excellence and an
eye to the future_
.
J A
R E ^ ,..';:; ,,- ,:;:---,
.Ld::~~' -, !
Building Addition
Informational Meeting
_JU~ 1_0 Z005 I
ell Y Or AkDEN HILLS I
RE:
McKnight Care Center
3220 Lake Johanna Blvd.
Arden Hills, MN 551 J 2
Date:
Time:
Location:
June 14th, 2005
6:30 pm
Trinity Lutheran Church
3245 New Brighton Road
Arden Hills, MN 551] 2
Presbyterian Homes would like to share with you information
on our opportunity to increase the quality of life for our
residents at McKnight Care Center. Thc State of Minnesota has
awarded McKnight Care Center an Exemption to the Nursing
Home Moratorium. This will allow us to increase the number
of rooms on our campus, eliminating the need for three resident
rooms and improving dining and community spaces, providing
service to the same number of residents with current staff.
Construction of a J 3, J 56 square toot addition adjacent to the
South end of the existing building will allow the necessary
room for these improvements, We arc working with the City
of Arden Hills for assurance all city codes and regulations will
be followed.
For additional information on the proposed addition/renovation
of MeKnight Care Center plcascjoin us on the 14th
/t1r1i1tlf!,nllCJll c~ SfTiJJre5
281iS IhmJincAvenuc North. Suile 200, Rosn-ilk, ,'dl'.' 55113 Phone (6S]) 631-6100 fax (<l51) 631-(JI08
(~
.
.
Planning Commission Meeting
July 6, 2005
Attachment 3a - 4
-,
'"
i.
/-'---
\
i
.
.
1J:"'~~;;'f
ii". --'~'!k',:_:; .--._- --<j.-~!f{'i<;_~~
.
&c
~
"
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
AMENDED SPECIAL USE PERMIT--Case
The undersigned~ Clerk-Administrator of the City of
Arden Hills, does hereby certify that this Amended Special Use
Permit is granted pursuant to the provisions of Ordinance
No. 99, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Arden Hills, in
accordance with a public hearing duly held by the Planning
Commission thereof on September 2, 1975 and subsequent approval
by the Arden Hills City Council on September B, 1975.
Permission is accordingly given the applicant, THE
PRESBYTERIAN HOMES OF MINNESOTA, a Minnesota non-profit
corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Permittee", to develop,
construct and operate upon the property hereinafter described,
a geriatric care center and ten (lO) townhouses for the elderly,
along with appurtenant walkways and parking lot area, all in
accordance with the various plans, drawings, renderings, pictures
and documents as have been submitted to the City, dated
August 19, 1975, have been reviewed, revised and approved by the
Planning Commission after modifications made thereto by Harty,
Elvig and AssOCiates, the architects for the Permittee, dated
September 4, 1975; and are on file with the Clerk-Administrator
in the City Hall.
The property which is the subject of this Amended
Special Use Permit is located at 3220 Lake Johanna Boulevard,
is apparently owned of record by the Permittee, and is legally
described as follows, to-wit:
All that part of Lot 5, Section 33, Township 30,
Range 23, according to United States Government
survey thereof described as follows, to-wit:
Beginning at a point on the west line of said Lot
5, 400 feet north of the southwest Corner of said
lot; thence north on the west line of said Lot 5
to the northwest Corner thereof; thence east on
the north line of said Lot 5 to a point where the
said north line intersects the easterly line of
said Lot 5; thence along the said easterly line
of said Lot 5 to the intersection thereof with
the northerly line of that tract or parcel of
land in said Lot 5 heretofore conveyed to Martin
Hosli by deed recorded in Book 491 of Deeds,
Page 93; thence west along the said northerly line
of said tract of land heretofore conveyed to the
said Martin Hosli to a point distant 884.8 feet
due north of the south line of said Lot 5 and
945.8 feet due east from the west line of said
Lot 5; thence in a southwesterly direction 936
feet to a point on the south line of said Lot 5
distant 630 feet east of the southwest corner of
said Lot 5; thence west along the south line of
said Lot 5 to the southwest corner thereof; thence
north along the west line of said Lot 5 to the
.
point of beginning excepting therefrom the following
described property, namely: (1) All that part of
said Lot 5 described as follows: Commencing at a
point where the northerly line of said Lot 5
intersects the westerly shore of Lake Johanna;
thence southwesterly 50 feet; thence at right
angles and southeasterly 100 feet to the shore of
Lake Johanna; thence along the shore of Lake
Johanna to the point of beginning and excepting also
(2) The southerly 400 feet of said Lot 5 which lies
Westerly of a line which is 66 feet northwesterly
of and parallel to the following described line:
Beginning at a point on the south line of said Lot 5
630 feet east of the southwest corner thereof;
thence running northeasterly in a straight line
936 feet to a point which is 884.8 feet due north
of the south line of said Lot 5 and 945.8 feet due
east of the west line of said Lot 5.
AND all that part of Government Lot 5, Section 33,
Township 30 North, Range 23 West, described as
follows: Commencing at a point where the Northerly
line of said Lot 5 intersects the Westerly shore of
Lake Johanna; thence Southwesterly 50 feet; thence
at right angles Southeasterly 100 feet to the shore
of Lake Johanna; thence along the shore of Lake
Johanna to the point of beginning; according to
the Government survey thereof: together with all
riparian rights acquired by the recession of Lake
Johanna;
AND ALSO a strip of ground 15 feet wide bounded on
the South by the South line of Lot 27 in Auditor's
Subdivision No. aOt Ramsey County, Minnesotat on the
West side by the Westerly line of said Lot 27; and
on the East side by the Easterly line of said Lot 27;
on the North by a line parallel to and 15 feet North
of the South line of said Lot 27 in Auditor's
Subdivision No. 80, Ramsey County, Minnesota, being
the South 15 feet of said Lot 27; as extended to
Lake Johanna, together with all riparian rights
acquired by the recession of Lake Johanna; according
to the plat thereof on file and of record in the
office of the Register of Deeds in and for said
Ramsey County.
This Amended Special Use Permit is issued not only
subject to Permittee's compliance with the general conditions
and documents mentioned hereinabove, but also subject to all
the requirements, provisions and conditions set forth in the
Special Use Permits issued to the Permittee on April 12, 1971
{Case No. 70-52) and April 9, 1973 (Case No. 73-10); except
as modified herein; subject to all the requirements and
conditions set forth in Ordinance No. 99, the Zoning Ordinance,
as amended, including Permittee's obtaining proper Building
Permits; and subject to the fallowing Special Conditions:
1. None of the buildings to be constructed
by Permittee shall exceed an elevation
of 24 feet above the grade of the east
right-ot-way line of Lake Johanna Boule-
vard.
- 2 -
JI
,,,C.'
,
j
.
.
~
,_tI
f '
I
,
.
.
.
2. The drainage plan of Permittee shall be
approved by the City Engineer.
3. The receiving doors shall be posted with
a sl go stating that deliveries will not
be accepted prior to 7:00 a.m.
4. landscaping of the subject premises shari
be performed In accordance with the
landscapIng plans flied by Permittee and
soal I be completed before the City wi I I
allow occupancy of the structures to be
constructed by Permittee pursuant to this
Permit. To assure the City that the
landscaping work wl It be done In accordance
wtth said landscaping plans and will be
completed at the time of final completion
of -the construction of said structures,
Permittee shalt post with the Clty--at the
tIme It applies for BuIlding Permtts--a
landscapTng performance bond in the SUm
of one hundred twenty-five percent (125%)
of the enttre cost of said landscaping .work,
as estimated by t~e Crty.~s Planner or landscape
Inspector, which sball name The City as
obligee. The form, subSTance and exeCUTion
of said performance bond, and the surety
issuing the same, shal I be~subJect to the
City Attorney's approval. Permittee shatl
reimburse the City for costs Incurred In
reviewing Permittee's landscaping plans, estimaT-
Ing the cost of the work and the amount of
the performance bond, Inspecting the work, giving
final approval thereof, and any other services
performed by him with respect to Permittee's
landscaping of the subject premises.
Dated this 8th day of September, 1975.
CITY OF ARDEN HillS
By Ok.d~~y;;)~~
Charlotte McNlesh,
Clerk-Administrator
-3-
.
,.
.
.
June 27, 1975
To: Arden Hills Planning Commission
From: R. D. Fredlund, Planner
Subject: McKnight Geriatric Care Center addition to Presbyterian Homes.
!,roposal
The proposed special permit request is to add a 4 story (2 stories above street
grade) geriatric unit to the existing home and convert the existing home into
a 170 bed board and lodging home. The addition will include 60 skilled-care
beds, 120 intermediate-care beds, 46 short term beds, a community services
program, medical clinic and day care facilities. In addition to the above
units and converstion of existing facilities, there is proposed 8 efficiency
liviag units and two 1 bed living units.
Comprehensive Plan
The plan for the area recognizes the continuation of the service in the area
of the home and has designated the site as a community facility site. As
such, density unlike TCCH which is located in a low density area, is more
dependent upon zoning definitions of use and density than is TCCH. There is
a proposed trails system along Johanna Boulevard - consideration might be
given to include the trails system through the site instead of along the
Boulevard. Such reaiignment might prove beneficial to residents of the home
as well as the general public, and a possible linking of the trails system
between the east ffild west sides of Lake Johanna might be more feasible.
Zoning Ordinance
The proposal (see attached information sheets) falls within the general re-
quirements of the R-l zone, using the apartment building densities. Three
areas of interpretation should be considered that mayor may not be at var-
iance with the ordinance: (1) Unit size - the square footage of the units
are less than the apartment units size) however, when considering that all
services are not provided within the unit as is the case with an apartment,
and that when the other service and support service areas are added to the
apartment units, the resul tant area falls \'I'i thin the ordinance requirements;
(2) Parking (underground) is provided up to the property line on Lake Johanna
Boulevard instead of ten feet from the line, however, in that the parking is
underground ffild therefore does not fall subject to the intent of setbacks.
Parking is more similar in this case to underground utilities and the in-
tent of the ordinance can be considered justified; (3) The ordinance has a
maximum height requirement of 35' , whereas the proposed building has a height
of 4 stories or 48 feet from ground level on the east side, however, the
building has only a 28' height on the street side or west side. This would
give an average height of 38' or only slightly above the required maximum
and considering that this is a community facility as opposed to a single
family home, the increase over maximum isn't too far out of align.
'.
\
.
.
i.
i
\
.
.
~I ~1P11(N.
The proposed con5truction will include in The McKnighf-Ga~~atric Care
Center tacil iTies for 60 skilled-care beds, 120 inTermediaTe-care beds,
45 short-Term beds, a community services program, a medical clinic, and
day-care fact I itie5. The Unit Housing construction wi II include 8 ett,iciency-
I iving units and 2 I~bed living uniTS.
The existing faci i ities wi II become 170 board & lodging beds. Support
funcTions wil I be modified to accommodaTe the proposed consTruction. This
wil I includa centra! iza~ion of The receiving, storage, waste areas~ and
expansion wiThin the existing fad I iTY of the kitchen and laundry funcTions.
~~T~
PROPOSED BU I LD1:-.G
CAR~ CUrrE~
-1st Level
-2nd Leve 1
-3rd Level
-4th Level
CONNECTiNG LINK
& TUNNEL
DELIVERY'"
SUPPORT
UNIT HOUSPIG:
-1st Leve! ';;ith
Connecting Link
-2nd level
EXISTING
CONSTRUCT I 0.'1 :
-Lower L~V91
-1st L.ev~l
-2nd level
31,226 sq.fT.
25,672 sq.ft.
25,662 sq.ft.
21,128 sq. ft.
103,638 sq. ft.
103,688 sq.ft.
4,440 sq.ft.
7,770 sq.fT.
12,210 sq.fT.
115,898 sq.ft.
'''.
10,588 sq. ft.
2 , I 05 sq. ft.
12,693 sq.ft.
128,591 sq.ft.
62,910 sq.ft.
100,490 sq.ft.
5.356 sq.ft.
169,256 sq. f t.
297,847 sq.fT. Total
LDT coJEIl.ACryff
re
(Arden Hil Is Zoning Ordinance allowable lot coverage - 25%)
LOT AREA - 18 acres ~ 784,080 sq.ft.
CARE CENTER
1st Level 31,226 sq.ft.
Connecting Link 2,220 sq. ft.
UNIT HOUSING
1st level "-
ConneCTing Link 10,588 sq.ft.
EXISTING CONSTRUCTION 100,490 sa.ft.
144,524 sq.H. TOTAL AT GRADE
144,524 sq.ft.
784,080
~ 18% lot coverage
.
.
I.
.
.
~ Ar;2f;A eATlO
(Arden Hi 115 Zoning Ordinance allowable - .5)
Floor Area
, LOT Area
LOT AREA - 18 acres = 784,080 sq.ft.
CARE CENTER 115,898 sq.fT.
UNIT HOUSING 12,693 sq. ft.
EXISTING BUILDING 169,256 sq.fT.
297,847 sq.fT.
297,847 sq. ft. = .38 F.A.R.
784,080
\...OT Af2CA ,-
~r {Z [1 I~'J pO"'L1ti
(Arden Hills Zoning Ordinance does nOT have a caTegory relaTing TO
health-care facilities. Therefore the following areas relate to Those
requirements stated for apartment bul!dings wiTh 4 families or over in
an R-l district. Efficiency uniTs require 2000 sq.fT. per unit; one-bed
units require 2800 sq.ft. per uniT. In our calculaTions we assume beds
to be efficiency units.l
CARE CENTER
180 beds
360,000 sq.fT.
UNIT HOUSING
2 efficiency units
8 i-bed units
4,000 sq.ft.
22,400 sq.ft.
EXISTING
170 beds
340,000 sq.H.
726,400 sq.fT.
Lot Area Required
Lot Area Available
784,080 sq.ft'.'
Not'e: The St. Louis Park Zoning Ordinance under Section 6:100
Residential-Business DistricT requires 400 sq.fT. of site
for each person acc~modated in nursing homes, resT homes,
and similar uses. These figures are presenTed as comparaTive
guide} ines.
:.
.
.
~.
.
.
ru;ol2- #2eA fSlZUNIT
Arden Hills Zoning Ordinance does not have a category relating to
haa Ith-care faci I ities. Therefore, the following areas rei are TO
those requirements staTed for apartment buildings with 4 families
or over in an R~I district. Efficiency units require 500 sq.ft. per
unit; one-bed unit requires 600 sq. ft. per unit.
CARE CENTER
180 efficiency units 72.462 sq.ft-..
Support FunCTions 18.000 sa. f t.
90.462 sq.ft. = 503 sq.ftJ,mit
UNIT HOUSING
2 efficiency units 1,026 sq.ft. = 513 sq.frJunir
8 I-bed units 5.616 sq.ft. = 702 sq.fTJunit
EXISTING
170 efficiency units 169,256sq.ft. = 996 sq.fTJunit
Nota: The St. louis Park Zonina Ordinance under Section 6.048 -Minimum
Usable Floor Area for D"~llings states "any dwelling sTructure'
other than a single family dwelling shall contain not less than
400 sq.ft. for each dwel ling not having a separate bedroom and
540 sq.ft. for a one-bed dwelling. These requirements are Dresented
as comparative guidel ines.
~/L.INc"
For :;ome of the funcTions with in the proposed faci I j"t'V th2re are no
applicahle requirements listed by the Arden Hills Zoning Ordinance.
In such cases requirement5 by the St. Louis Park Zoning Ordinance
have beefl used as guidelines. The origin of the substituted criteria
is listed follmoling tiB calculations.
CARE CENTER
Skilled-Care & Intermediate Care
180 beds
41 spaces (St.l.P.)
Day-Cara
46 beds
14 spaces (St.l.P.)
Community Services
(Arden Hills, professional offices)
(I space per 400 sq.ft.)
38 spaces
CI inic
(Arden Hil Is, clinic)
5 spaces
UNIT HOUSING
(Arden Hills, 1-1/2 spaces per unit)
15 spaces
EXISTING BUILDING
board & loeg irlg
170 beds
St. Louis Park Zoning Ordinance
SecTion 6.172.4
Subd. 15.
Number of Required Off Street Parkinq Spaces:
Sani~r!ums, Convalescent Home, ReST Home, Nursinq Home
or De'l 0hJrsery Five (5) spaces plus one (I) for each
five (5) beds for which accommodaTions are offered.
c.
.
.
.
.
,
EHp~
Fol lowing construction OT the proposed project the number of employees
needed to operate the entire facility will be 175 over three shifts,
but could include 227 ~30Dle per pay-period. This figure represents part-
time as 'Hal I as: full-tiele employees--a total of 100 full-time equivalent
employeas.
These employees wll I be divided into shifts approximately as follows:
84 - 80rning shifT
61 - afternoon S~i;7
30 - night shifT
175
,
'e
,
,
i; i
LI
., i
:.1
':'1
, I
, ,
,).\
.ti;
Ii!
q:t2 q? eB 8tb e4 et2 eo
110' II I))
'I I I I I ,
, I {I
), ,'!/ {'
I ;,,'
, ,
I i i/'
i 'I
j I,
, .
, i
6kN~
70 7&
f -4
~
74-
. ----1-___
72
70
-~
Ub
,,!:ow
j
. .j
,
,
}~,- . -
_-k-!
I::
I','
t'l_
rt'!
i."
ijd
Li ~! .
WL
H:t;.-}
lrl.:'
'" , I,'
j ~ J Ul
i!! _
I'! ,
ri 1 _'
{,:"i h{(
I , -, ..~...
" "I
1 !<r':~'l
1.:-,;;
'-' ; --
l:iM
; ;!!\
:f!
.f-t7
,/
\
\
\
j I
; ..--/ /
" ~~--~/
4 ( "..", _ (
- --- -- -- --
/
/
/ / ~
~ "
'~/-tCL
,.~'
''''~''
"-"
Lp
J
/
~:<I-0T! t:'01
fL~' '/fffiZ-
\. '
, ':-;"-",
P, 7;:;-E;7A1/i,' !I~ ,/'
,~~/,
1.1.;
, ,
,"I'
~^...-,~ -7'l-----
. I~ 1
J.
--,--" '----
~~,'
(-
.
.
-!-'- --''''''
,',~:':"".~<~~.
"''';-
",,0,'
:
';,-;
'---,,:Of.>:':.{
.-;..,,<
.,,>~
"--;
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
,
VILLAGE OF ARDEN HILLS
"
,
l',:' ,
SPECIAL USE PERMIT - CASE NO,:lo'".5~ I:"
Ii',
The undersigned, Clerk AdmInIstrator of the_ 'llllege ,o_fArdE'!'ry i",'.-~,:t,:';:
Htll's', doe-s hereby certify that thIs Spe:ciaf Use Permit-is- gr~-nle~.
pursuant tot~e provisions OOf Ordinance No~ 99,of.Ard~,~HJ:ll~:I":_~_"
a-ceordance 'with a public hearing duly he!d on ,^prJ r 6-,.,.,;t97 1_ by::_,.:t,J:':~:r
Pfannlng CommtssJon. and subsequent approval.t.h(J!reoC:l>y'thet\rQ6{)
Hills Coun,ct I on April 12, 1971.
Permission Is accordingly given for the co~s:1:ru:~t'~~-,O-f,..e:>i'~:~-~:-~,~4~>;':-'
facilities of-the Presbyterfan Homes, In accorda~>ce.w'f,t~_plafl,s s~'~;t:_'},-'
mitted wIth Case No. 70-52. at 3220 lake Johanni!!:->aou_rEiv~.f"-_~,.-)n Ar#en-,
H'lfs. whlch property 15 regally descrIbed asfol-lows, to'"'\ltlt,:.-
All f.ha_t part of lot 5.. Sec. 33. T. 30" R._'_:?'J<de'sc:r)".~.~d;a~;"/:_>)
tol tow_s. to~w,lt: Baglnntng at a poInT on.t~,-,~,,~W.,I:;~~~;"';:9t:<~:'~:1:-_!r
LOT 5, 400 feet N. of the SW corner of saJ!J~::l.gt_;,"'::_t,~;~~~~::~:'<-~<~r1"9!r;":
the W'o' ,IJ,n:e of sa J d Lot 5 to the NW:_corn~r^~th~t:f3''71if'':~;t~,:~:~<:fj:l!(,~~,?;,:-,,'_
on the N Hne of said Lot 5 to a polnt- where:,+hf3.-:.s_a:_lf(,,:~:::}.a:,n:~:~jM~':n".
sects the E' I y . f ne of sa f d lot 5; the_-nc-ear::~n9:-th~,'~:~,-J::4y:.~,,":,{X':::.,
I:lne_ of . sai'd lot 5 to the Intersectlon" the:rep_f',~J-+h,-:'..'t~l(:-~li::~:X::_;;
11-"i3-of thaT tract or parcel of la_n-d In sard_ l,o:t,,'.5--}i;_f3.r"liJJ8J~~;f':!:~:
conv~'yed to. ,Ma rt I n Hos I-I by Dee d rec'orded' I ?_~ ,u49)_:_r:;'~___I?~::~:~:~}:~;!;f:tf;';'2
thenceW_3,fong the said N'ly I~ne ofsaid,t-r-a9:t_',9:t'"-:,:J~~,'1_~;"_:,~;~'~:~:1~"!?:"_'
fQre conveyed to the sai~d Martin HO$I S_ to ap9J:ptJ.t..tJ:~:t.~;~~~t-,;:~:~'5tt.;:
fe'at due N. of the S. line of said lot 5 and;9:?~'~:fl~:;f&~-j<:'a_U_Et::~j;~j'7-{>'
.1 rom. the_, W fine of sa I_d lot. 5; thence ,fn 'a 'S~W:'-':1;r-::tii_~~ii9.:ti;?~ri:.;*f'~;;;::' -
936 feet-to a point on the S line ofs~ld lo;r;'~_$,::~ctr:~::!~-:ri~:.):p;'~;o.;:~}!:;_
feet E of the SW corner of Lot- 5; the'nce,\W_:~'J',,<>~9::"-'/_ti~_:_~:,;-Yf::KeJ/:~:,;
of saId LOT 5 to the SW corner thereo,f;th~n~:Et;':'::_::~::~,J:~:~~i:'.~'-^'"' -~:'~':;::
I rne of said LOT 5 to the point of beg-''1nJ'19::':_;~;)(S~pf.Gf
f rom the f 0 It ow I ng de 5 cr Ibed property. na_me..'y-:,:,', ,_" , .-::;,
(I) All -that _part of said Lot 5 descrlbed~~s,;__'.f.;?I,:J~:~s:::-:.,.__.Q
mencl~~_.at- a point where the N'ly lill.'~::::9f~:,,:~:,~l~~}i,i,1i~;t;y~:'~.'
sect.s-fhe W'ty shore of lake jOhanna;-.-+:tl6tlC~:;:f._:s.~'~':I_Y':_,-_~fc
the nc.e at rig h tan 9 I e san d S E I I Y . t.o 0 _ f.$:~::t~,t?>-t.Jl,~-'~~,~~~,?_f;
LaJ(e:.J;9hanna; thence aloog the shore_-f'+-~,~'~,~':;~:~J?,h'-a9:";~:i~!;
( 2) po i)\J 9~-,beg I no 109 and except i ng_a:1 sq;,:,::,',,:,-.'-_:-::';-::;:-'::::_"',:-:f:<:;
Th'~~:);:::'ly AOO- feet of sa I d lo'" 5 - whl:ch,:_J,f-~,5~~'~Jf:t~:,~_:QJ':ij.__::
whl'ctl:'ls66.feet NW'ly of and paraff.ef-t-o_~,t-h_~/Jf,:qfJ?~;r~;,~
desc_r'lbed I tne;: Begfnnlog at a p~Jnt-on the,:__/,:~::::,:",~,:,(,?,:,r.
~ot:5630 feet E of the SW corner th~r~():t;_,:',t_:!l,~:~f_:,~;i-
in a:,srrafght I rne 936 feet to a p.Qint,,_h'If:'''(:~'~::~:<{(
N of'The S line of said lot 5 and945~8:,f-~,~t.*-:d}i,~':/~.,n':
line of said lot 5. .
Th-:ls:~,pa:rm j t ls r ssued ~ubject tea'f I ttt:f3.,_'r.(tiq
ditl~ns"s~t forth in OrdInance No. 99, thef9_n,lh~K>h:
to t_he qb,;t:<}lnlng of a proper buIlding permit.;-:.I)Y ,ftleic
sa lid buJidir(g.
-Daf~d at Arden Hi lis, Mfnnesota.thls /-!1 ';-'-~~iIY:
VILLAGE OF ARDEN HILLS
L {,
F'r
By ~~:~~f~~~~ff~v>-r1: 1/
y!
:'1
1
:;,/~
~-",i'
J
.
.
.
.
.
.
City Council Meeting
July 11,2005
Attachment 6B - 4
.' ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - JULY 6, 2005
2
. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. PLANNING CASE #05-17: PRESBYTERIAN HOMES, 2845 HAMLINE
AVENUE N. #100, ROSEVILLE. MN; SUP AMENDMENT FOR MCKNIGHT
CARE CENTER ADDITION (3220 LAKE JOHANNA BL YD.)
Mr. Hellegers stated applicants were requesting a Special Use Permit Amendment for an
addition to the south end of the McKnight Care Center on the Presbyterian Homes
property in Arden Hills. Staff recommended approval of the Special Use Permit
Amendment for the Presbyterian Homes, after making a finding that the special use will
not have an adverse impact on the surrounding properties or on the community as a
whole, based on the following conditions:
1.
2.
.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7,
Revised Final Plans, The applicant shall submit revised plans, responsive to the
comments from the Plan review Comments section of staffs report (9),
contained in City Planning File #05-12, for review and approval by the City
Planner, City Engineer, and City Building Official, prior to issuance of building
permits.
Landscaping Plans. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan for
review and approval by the City Planner prior to the issuance of any occupancy
permit.
Screening of Mechanical Operating Equipment. All mechanical operating
equipment shall be screened to meet City regulations.
Noise Level of Mechanical Operating Equipment All mechanical operating
equipment shall meet the City regulations for noise levels. If the City Council
determines that the noise level from the mechanical operating equipment is not
meeting City regulations for noise levels; the applicant shall be required to
reduce the noise levels from the mechanical operating equipment.
Protective Fencing on the Retaining Wall. Protective fencing shall be erected at
the top of the retaining wall. Fencing may be decorative (wrought iron) or a
vinyl coated chain link style fencing (suggest black, brown, or dark green).
Execution of an sun Amendment Permit. Execution of an SUP Amendment
Permit drafted by the City Attorney and approved by the City Council prior to
the issuance of a Building Pennit
Necessary Approvals from Other Agencies. The applicant shall obtain all
necessary permits from the Rice Creek Watershed District, Ramsey County,
State of Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and any other governing
agencies where applicable,
Chair Sand opened the public hearing at 7:28 p,m,
Chair Sand invited anyone for or against the variance to come forward and make
comment.
.
There were no comments made,
Chair Sand closed the public hearing at 7:29 p,m,
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - JULY 6, 2005
3
.
.
Commissioner Bezdicek asked if the brick would be consistent with the existing building. .
Jolm Mehrkens, Presbyterian Homes, replied the brick would be matched as close as
possible. He noted the building should look very consistent.
Commissioner Modesette asked if there had been a neighborhood meeting. Mr. Hellegers
replied there had been a neighborhood meeting with 12 to 14 residents in attendance.
Commissioner Modesette asked if there would be anything further other than plantings
along the top of the retaining wall. Mr. Mehrkens replied staff had recommended a fence
on the top of the retaining wall, which they would comply with.
Commissioner McClung asked on the rooftop terrace, what type of fencing would there
be and how wide were the posts going to be. He indicated he was concerned about
screening the terrace. Mr. Mehrkens replied the top floor would have a vertical slatted
fence, to bring in light and allow residents to look out as well. He stated the fence would
sit on a knee wall, which would sit 2-3 feet off of the finished floor. He indicated they
would use this only during staff supervised times. He stated there would be planter pots
and a garden that would be used as an activity, as well as a screening use. He noted the
closest point to a residential home would be 210 feet.
Commissioner McClung asked if the low level hedges would be removed. Mr. Mehrkens
replied they intended on keeping the hedges where they were.
Commissioner Thompson asked how successful did they think they would be in .
relocating the large trees. Mr. Mehrkens stated after further analysis, a couple of the trees
were diseased and would need to be removed, but the trees they could remove and
relocate they would and if those trees did not live, they would be replaced with like trees
ofreasonable size.
Commissioner McClung moved, seconded by Commissioner Modesette that the Planning
Commission considered the effect of the proposed use based upon the health, safety,
convenience and general welfare of the owners and occupants of surrounding land, in
particular, and the community as a whole, in general, including but not limited to the
following factors: existing and anticipated traffic and parking conditions; noise, glare,
odors, vibration, smoke, dust, air pollution, heat, liquid or solid waste, and other nuisance
characteristics; drainage; population density; visual and land use compatibility with uses
and structures on surrounding land; adjoining land values; park dedications where
applicable, and the orderly development of the neighborhood and the City within the
general purpose and intent of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Development Plan
for the City and recommended approval of Planning Case No. 05-17, Presbyterian
Homes, 2845 Hamline Ave. N, #100, Roseville, MN; SUP Amendment for McKnight
Care Center Addition (3220 Lake Johanna Blvd.) subject to the seven conditions as
outlined in staffs July 6,2005 report.
The motion carried unanimously (7-0).
.
UNJ;'INISHED AND NEW BUSINESS
,
~
~HlLLS
City ot Arden Hills
Re uest for Council Action
Prepared by: GSB
Dept.: Engineer
Council Mtg. Date: 7/11/05
Final Action Needed By: 7/11/05
Agenda Item
2006 Lift Station Rehabilitation
Budgeted Amount: 400.000
Actual Amount: 26,600
Funding Source: Sanitary Utility
Council Action Request:
Authorize City Engineer to prepare plans and specifications for the 2006 Lift Station Rehabilitation Project
for Lift Stations #1, #11, #12 and #13.
Staff Recommendation:
The City has been performing lift station rehabilitation converting our older stations to submersible
pumps. Earlier this year as a part of the review of bids for lift stations 4&9, staff recommended that the
final four lift stations to be rehabilitated be done as a single project in 2006. We are requesting
authorization to complete engineering at this time to allow for bidding in the late fall which should provide
for a competitive bid environment. Initiating engineering at this time will also allow us to refine the
estimated project costs for lift stations during our review of the Capital Improvements Program this
summer, Final plans and specifications will be prepared with this authorization. Council will be requested
to authorize the advertisement of the project in October following preparation of plans and specifications.
Advisory Commission Action:
Commission
Date
Action
.
Planning
PTRC
u ... ..~m_...J'J()t~[>[llic_atJle . ...____
... mu_____~ ...,'_~--.l'J.otl\ppli<:abJe__~_1
, ,'u..,___ _t>lotapplic1l.bl~.._.____j
Supporting Documents (which are attached to this Action Form):
D Memo/Letter:
D Resolution (No. )
D Ordinance (No. )
[8J Engineering Recommendation: Work authorization letter from City Engineer to Michelle Wolfe dated
7/1/05
D Attorney Recommendation:
DOther:
Financial Implications:
Engineering scope per the city ongoing contract terms with URS. Total project cost anticipated to include
approximately $75,600 in engineering and $425,000 in construction, Engineering fees to prepare plans
and specifications total $26,600,
Wdministrator/Staff Comments:
Page 1 of 1
.URS
July 1,2005
Item 6C
Ms, Michelle Wolfe
City Administrator
City of Arden Hills
1245 West Highway 96
Arden Hills, MN 55112
RE: Work Order OS-03
2006 Lift Station Rehabilitation
Dear Ms, Wolfe,
The following proposal is offered as a confirmation of our scope of work, estimated fees and schedule for the
above-referenced project.
.ENERALPROJECTSCOPE
he proposed scope of work includes services fOf preliminary engineering, preparation of final plans and
construction services for the proposed rehabilitation of Lift Stations #1, #11, #12 and #13 located throughout the
City, These four lift stations are the last remaining stations with dry well operating systems to be replaced with
submersible pump systems,
BASIC SERVICES
Design Phase
URS will provide preliminary engineering services for the proposed project including the evaluation of alternatives
which may be appropriate, URS will conduct field reviews of the project site as necessary and prepare presentation
graphics and exhibits for public information and council review, URS will make modifications to the proposed
improvement scope as directed by City staff and Council. The preparation of a feasibility report is not included in
the scope of professional services, URS will prepare final plans and specifications for the project in accOfdance
with the Professional Services Agreement. City staff will provide as-built information as needed for the project.
Final plans and specifications will be prepared Lo City standards and will include removal plans, utility
reconstruction plans, grading plans, details, and site restoration plans as necessary, Final plans and specifications
will be submitted to City staff fOf review and comment,
Bidding Phase
URS will provide bidding phase services in accordance with the Professional Services Agreement. URS will
submit advertisements for bidding, produce bidding documents, answer contractor questions, issue addendums and
conduct the bid opening, URS will check bids and provide a detailed bid tabulation and recommendation of award
to City Council.
.
.
Ms. Michelle Wolfe
July 1,2005
Page 2
Construction Phase
URS will provide construction services in accordance with the Professional Services Agreement. The services will
include contract administration, shop drawing review, field inspections and construction staking. Construction
testing will be coordinated by URS but will be provided by others and will be billed directly to the City by the firm
perfonmng the work.
ADDITIONAL SERVICES
In addition to the Basic Services detailed above, URS will provide additional services for field survey necessary for
the project.
Field Survey
Field surveying will be completed for the project during both the Preliminary and Final Design Phases of the
project. It is anticipated that the survey will be a topographical survey to include right of way, easements, existing
utilities and all topographic points which, will be impacted by this project. All survey information will be based
upon the Ramsey County Coordinate System in order to allow easy correlation with City GIS mapping information,
ESTIMATED COSTS
We propose that the basic services identified above be completed on a percentage of construction cost basis
consistent with the terms of our Professional Services Agreement. The preliminary estimate for the project cost .
including 18% for Engineering and construction administration is $500,000 all of which would be funded from the
sanitary sewer enterprise fund, The total budgeted project cost in the CIP for lift stations are $200,000 (2006) and
$200,000 (2007) for a total of $400,000, The CIP budget should be adjusted during the annual review this summer
to reflect the current estimated cost as well as the fact that the project will be completed in one year instead of two
years, An outline of our estimated fees and direct expenses for the project are detailed below:
Estimated Fees for Basic Services
Percentage Multiplier to be used for Basic Services based upon estimated construction cost of $425,000.00 and
curve included on Exhibit D of the Professional Services Agreement: 4.70%
Breakdown of Basic Services
Design Phase (90% of 4.7%)
Bidding Phase (10% of 4.7%)
Construction Services (10% of Ave. 3 bids)
Subtotal Basic Services (14.7% of construction)
$17,980,00
$ 2,000,00
$42.500.00
$62,480.00
Estimated Fees for Additional Services (hourly, not-to-el\ceed)
Field Survey:
CAD Technician: 16 Hours @ $65.00
Survey Coordinator 4 Hours @ $85,00
Surveyor 120 Hours @ $60,00
Subtotal Additional Services (hourly)
$ 1,040,00
$ 340.00
$ 7.200.00
$ 8,580.00
.
.
Ms. Michelle Wolfe
July 1,2005
Page 3
Direct Expenses
Direct expenses for the project include items such as mileage, parking, photography. printing and delivery services.
URS will bill all expenses incurred on the project directly to the City with no URS markup, . Expenses are
anticipated to include printing and distribution of plans and specifications ($2,500), construction materials testing
($1,500) and mileage ($500), The total estimated amount for direct expenses is $4,500,00
ESTIMATED FEE SUMMARY
Basic Services (percent of construction cost)
Additional Services (hourly, not-to-exceed)
Expenses (estimated, no markup)
Total Es1imated Cost
$ 62,480.00
$ 8,580,00
$ 4.500.00
$ 75,560.00
All work, therefor is estimated to be complete for a total amount of $75,560,00, Final amounts for Basic Services
and Construction Services will be based upon the actual construction cost of the project in accordance with the
Professional Services Agreement. Additional Services will be performed on an hourly basis based upon the
parameters outlined in the Professional Services Agreement. Expenses will be billed directly to the City with no
URS markup,
.-,sCHEDULE
_he following is the proposed schedule for the project:
Field Survey of four Sites
Complete Final Design & Construction Documents
Bid Opening
Begin Construction
Complete Construction
July, 2005
September, 2005
October, 2005
December, 2005
June, 2006
Thank you for the opportunity to provide these services. We look forward to working with you and City staff on
this project. Please call if you have any questions or we can provide any additional information. A completed
Work Order Form is attached for your execution.
Sincerely,
,~
Arden
Copy:
Tom Moore/Arden Hills
Tom Geear/URS
Frank Ticknor/URS
File: Pending
.
WORK ORDER NO.
05-03
.
This is an authorization to proceed and site-specific scope of services under the
Professional Services Agreement between the City of Arden Hills and URS dated
November 1,1997.
Project:
2006 Lift Station Rehabilitation Project
We hereby authorize you to proceed with the following phases of services:
Preliminary Design Services, Final Design Services, Bidding Services and
Construction Services as outlined in URS proposal letter dated July 1, 2005.
Payment shall be on the basis of:
. Percent of Construction Cost: In accordance with Exhibit D of the Professional
Services Agreement.
The Estimated Total Fee for URS under the Work Order is:
$75,560.00
The Final Completion Date for the services included under the Work Order is:
July, 2006
.
URS, INC.
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS
Signed:
Signed:
Title:
Title:
Date:
Date:
.
~
.~HILLS.
CIty otArden HIlls
Request for Council Action
Prepared by: SC
Dept.: CD
Council Mtg, Date: 7/11/2005
Final Action Needed By:
7/11/2005
Agenda Item '" I.
TCAAP Update
Budgeted Amount: $0.00
Actual Amount:
Funding Source:
Council Action Request:
None
Staff Recommendation:
None
Advisory Commission Action:
Commission
Date
Action
Not
Not
Supporting Documents (which are attached to this Action Form):
.
o Memo/letter:
o Resolution (No. )
o Ordinance (No. )
o Engineering Recommendation:
D Attorney Recommendation:
DOther:
Financial Implications:
Administrator/Staff Comments:
Regular TCAAP update centering on discussions with the GSA on June 30, 2005
.
Page 1 of 1