Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 10-10-2006 . ~ ~~HILLS Approved: 10/30/06 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS. MINNESOTA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 10, 2006; 7:00 P.M. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Beverly Aplikowski called to order the regular City Council meeting at 7:02 p.m. Present: Mayor Beverly Aplikowski, Councilmembers David Grant (arrived at 7:20 . p.m.), Gregg Larson, and Brenda Holden. Absent: Councilmember Vincent Pellegrin (excused). Also present were City Administrator, Michelle Wolfe; City Attomey, Jerry Filla; Community Development Director, Karen Barton; City Planner, James Lehnhoff; and Recording Secretary, Kathleen Altman. 1. APPROV AL OF MEETING AGENDA Councilmember Holden requested item 7F be added to New Business: Appointment of Gregory Hoag as Public Works Director. :Vlayor Aplikowski requested item 3G. be pulled from the Consent Calendar and added as item 4A. MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmcmber Larson seconded a motion to approve the meeting agenda as amended. The motion carried unanimously (3-0). 2. APPROV AL OF MINUTES . A. September 25,2006 City Council Meeting B. September 18,2006 Work Session Meeting ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - OCTOBER 10,2006 2 . C. September 11, 2006 City Council Meeting D. August 10, 2006 City Council Meeting E. July 25, 2006 City Council Meeting MOTION: Councilmember Larson moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a motion to approve the September 25, 2006 City Council Meeting Minutes as presented, the September 18, 2006 Council Work Session Minutes as presented, the September 11, 2006 City Council Meeting as presented, the August 10, 2006 City Council Meeting as presented, and the July 25, 2006 City Council meeting as presented. The motion calTied unanimously (3- 0). 3. CONSENT CALENDAR a. Claims and Payroll b. Resolution No. 06-48: A Resolution Appointing the 2006 General Election Judges c. Resolution No. 06-50: Resolution Requesting Funding from MnDOT through the Municipal Agreement Program for Pedestrian Improvements to County Road E Bridge over Trunk Highway 51 d. Motion to Approve City Administrator Michelle Wolfe's Performance Evaluation and Salary Step Increase c. Motion to Order Preparation of the 2007 Fcasibility Report for the 2007 PMP Project . f. Motion to Approve the Printing of a Legal Notice Summarizing Ordinance No. 380 "Animals and Pets" of the Arden Hills City Code rr Motion to Approve a Contract with Stephcn J. Eubul of Kennedy & Gru'/en Chartcred O' to Providc Legal Serviccs Relating to the Purchase of the Tv/in Cities "'\nny Ammunition Plant MOTION: Councilmember Larson moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a motion to approve the Consent Calendar and to authorize execution of all necessary documents contained therein. The motion carried unanimously (3-0). 4. PULLED CONSENT ITEMS A. Motion to !..pproYe a Contract ',dth Stephen J. Bubul of Kennedy & Cra'len (;hartered to Provide Le2al Seryiecs Relatin2 to the Purchase of the Twin Cities Army }....mmunition Plant Mayor Aplikowski moved item 4A to 7G. 5. PUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONAIJ . None. I ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - OCTOBER 10,2006 3 . 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS I I A. Royal Oaks - Vacatin2: of a 20 foot wide Pedestrian Walkway Easement at the Old City Hall Site I I Mr. Lehnhoff stated Royal Oaks Realty was requesting the vacation of the Pedestrian Walkway Easement. The easement was lapproximately 20 feet wide by 280 feet long and was located on the former Arden Hills City Hall/Public Works property at 1440-1450 West Highway 96. I Mr. Lehnhoff also stated that he recommends that condition one be removed from the staff recommendation. Since the easement would need to be vacated for anyone that purchased this propel1y, the vacation should not be contingent upon conveying the trail along the westem side of the property to the City. He stated the City would require anyone purchasing the propeliy to I convey the trail to the City. Should Royal Oaks decide to not develop the property, the City would have to address this easetnent again in the future if the condition is kept. Councilmember Holden ask6d why we would want to vacate this easement without the condition. I Mr. Jerry Filla stated that thd City is the fee owner of the property, and the City Could place future easement on the property:. . Mayor Aplikowski opened the1public hearing at 7:10 p.m. I There were no comments made. I Mayor Aplikowski closed the ~ublic hearing at 7: 11 p.m. MOTION: Councilmember Larson moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a motion to approve the Resolution 06-49 to vacate the 20 foot wide pedestriah walkway easement at 1440-1450 West Highway 96. The motion carried unanimously (3-0). 7. NEW BUSINESS I A. Plannin2: Case 06-028: Site Plan Review - Hien N2:o & Np.uvet Kv: 3433 Lake Johanna Boulevard I I Mr. Lehnhoff stated the Plmming Commission reviewed the re-Iandscaping plan and unanimously voted to table the application at their October 4, 2006 meeting. While the landscaping plan was moving in the right direction, the Commission tabled the application in order to obtain additional infotmation regarding the shoreland restoration, the stonnwater pipe and easement along the northem edge of the property, clarifying the duration of the financial . surety, and the trees near the westem edge of the property. If the applicant can submit revised plans in time for the next PlanAing Commission meeting, the site plan review would appear on I ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - OCTOBER 10, 2006 4 . the November 1, 2006 Planni~g Commission agenda. He indicated no action was required from the Council at this time. , B. Plannin2: Case 06-029: Final Plat - Royal Oaks Realtv. Inc.. 1440 - 1450 \-Vest Hi2:hway 96 Mr. Lehnhoff stated the City Attomey had reviewed the bylaws, articles, and declarations and sent the needed changes to th~ applicant. The requested changes werc largely technical in nature to ensure that the lcgal documents confoml to the conditions in the PUD approval. Hc indicatcd the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Final Plat based on the submitted plans and six conditions. ' MOTION: Mayor ~plikowski moved and Councilmember Larson seconded a motion to approve the Final Plat subject to the submitted plans and recommended six conditions and the recommended site development agreement. , Ms. Barton stated the applicant had requested this be tabled due to possible site contamination, but it was under staff's recqmmendation this not be tabled to be in compliance with the agreement. Mike Black stated they had requested this item be tabled and there was some contamination on . the site, but it was felt that it could be cleaned up on site. He stated since his conversation with staff this moming, they had ~'eceived further information and there were no large concerns regarding this and he approved ,this going forward tonight. , She believed the City had Councilmember Holden stated she would be voting against this. made a mistake by approving this and would learn from this mistake on future developments. I , The motion carried (2-1) (Councilmember Holden opposed). , C. Plannin2: Case 06-030: ,Variance - Brad & Sara Lis. 1548 Arden Place Councilmember Grant arriveq at 7:20 p.m. Mr. Lehnhoff stated the applicant was requesting two variances for 1548 Arden Place, which was located in the Ridgewood ~eighborhood on the northeastern comer of Lake Johanna. The first variance request was to pennit the property to have two access points to Arden Place, and the second variance request was: to permit the driveway to be a crushed rock surface instead of an improved surface. The requests are not contingent upon each other. He indicated the Planning Commission unanimously recOlnmended denial of both variances based on ten findings of fact. , He indicated he had received an' email from Paul and Mary Crosby, 1385 Arden Place, in support of the variance. , . ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL-OCTOBER 10,2006 5 . Councilmember Holden asked what was in the plan Mr. Lis submitted. Mr. Lehnhoff stated that the building plan provided by Mr. Lis showed the driveway as being a crushed rock driveway, which was marked as approved by the building dcpartment. He noted the plan did not include the two access driveway however. Councilmember Holden asked when the building pennit had been closed out. Mr. Lehnhoff responded the building pemlit has not been closed out. Brad Lis, 1548 Arden Place, stated they believed the crushed gravel had been approved by the City. He stated they had changed the configuration of the driveway along the way with the thought that they were doing it with the approval of the City. He stated the first time they knew they had an issuc about this was a few weeks ago. He believed the driveway fit nicely into thc neighborhood. He noted the driveway had been there for over three years. He believed this wou Id constitute a hardship because of the loss of trees. He noted there were other instances of the two driveway access and he believed it added a nice feature to the neighborhood. He asked Council to grant this variance request. Councilmember Holden asked how many two access driveways were in the neighborhood. Mr. Lehnhoff responded there were at least two driveways in the neighborhood that had dual accesses. . Sarah Lis, 1548 Arden Place, stated there were six residences in this area that had double access driveways. She noted this was a large percentage of driveways in the neighborhood. She indicated there were othcr double accesses outside of this neighborhood also. Councilmember Grant asked if the City had not done the Siems Court road project, if it was quite likely this would not have been discovered and the driveway would have existed for years. Mr. Lehnhoff responded he believed this would have been caught at some point because the building inspector has been catching up with the building pennits, but it was the road project that brought this to the City's attention. Councilmember Grant asked if the City stamped this as approved, wouldn't that be considered a variance. Mr. Lehnhoff responded legally it was not a variance. Councilmember Grant stated he was familiar with this neighborhood and a number of those residents did have dual access driveways, including the residents across the street from the applicant. Mayor Aplikowski stated this was a difficult one because they were balancing this with the letter of the law mld their own practicalities. With respect to the double driveway, she saw no reason for it not to be allowed at this point. She stated to go back now and remove the double driveway would not make sense. She indicated this did not impact any of the neighbors and did not affect the neighborhood. She noted they had received support from the neighbors in support . of this variance also. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL-OCTOBER 10,2006 6 ei Councilmember Holden asked why this driveway was not acceptable, while other driveways in the neighborhood were. Mr. Lehnhoff responded the other driveways in the neighborhood existed prior to 2000 and were considcred grand fathered in. Councilmember Larson stated he could not support either variance. He did not bclieve they had a good justification for granting this variance and he believed they would be setting a precedent for other residents. He believed if this went through, it would be a mistake on the part of the City and he believed the Planning Commission had made the right decision. He stated it was unf0l1unate the Building Inspector had stamped this approved, but the Building Inspector could not approve variances, which only the City Council could grant variances. He believed the access point to the west was more than adequate to get in and out of the driveway and they could put in a turnaround if necessary. He stated the curb was in now and there was one curb cut, which would add to additional cost if they allowed a dual access driveway. He believed staff and the Planning Commission had made the correct recommendation and he would support it. Councilmember Grant stated he also had looked at this property and the one thing that was easily noticeable was the 24-foot road and if they looked at their standards, the road should be 32 feet, so with this odd angle as a single driveway, the applicants would have to back out at an odd angle on a narrow street. In conjunction with that, it would be difficult to park a car in the driveway and still get out in the current configuration if it were a single driveway. . Mayor Aplikowski agreed and noted they would need to take up a large portion of their grass for a turnaround. She agreed with the Plmming Commission's recommendation. but believed this would not be precedent setting because this was an odd situation and she believed the driveway should remain as it was. Councilmember Holden stated she believed in keeping the mature trees in the City and they should bend over backwards to keep the trees and look at the loss of trees as a hardship. She stated for four years the applicants have been planning their life around this driveway, house, and yard and now because the City had not closed out the pennit, the City was demanding this be changed. She stated it was no fault of the applicant that this had occurred. She stated she was in agrecment with Mayor Aplikowski and Councilmember Grant. MOTION: Councilmember Grant moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a motion to approve the variance for a dual driveway based on the following facts: The angle of the house, the narrowness of the exit; the building of the street which was less than City standards making the angle difficult to back out of. Councilmember Larson asked what the requirements were for approval of the variance. Mr. Filla replied Council needed to detenlline the following: If this was a reasonable use of the property; wi 11 this change the character of the neighborhood if granted; was this a self-created hardship and the facts should be tied into these three criteria. . ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - OCTOBER 10, 2006 7 . Councilmember Grant stated the City created a road in front of the property, which was substandard to the 32-foot road, and thereby the City infringed upon this. He noted the road design was not created by the resident. This also did not change the character of the neighborhood given the number of dual driveways. Councilmember Holden stated they could make them cover the crushed rock on the second dual access point with sod, so considering the angle of the property and that at any point in time, if they did change this, it would change the character of the neighborhood, she believed this was a reasonable use for the property. Councilmember Larson stated the width of the road was consistent with the neighborhood and he did not believe they should use that as an argument as the need for a variance. He expressed concern about setting a precedent and he did not believe this was a good justification. The motion carried (3-1) (Councilmember Larson opposed). Councilmember Grant stated the residents had a reasonable assumption that the crushed rock driveway was approved and as such it should be allowed to continue. He noted the only reason this was discovered was because the City had improved the street. Mayor Aplikowski stated she was struggling with allowing crushed rock to remain and she . would like to add whenever this driveway was replaced that it be replaced with a City approved driveway surface. Councilmember Holden stated with all of the water runoff, why they would not allow this. She noted a crushed rock driveway could be maintained nicely. Mayor Aplikowski stated she was inclined to say this driveway was okay because it was maintained, but when this driveway needed to be replaced she would want it to be replaced with a City approved surface. Councilmember Larson stated they had a Code and if Council was not comfortable with the Code they should change the Code and not issue variances. He stated if a variance was going to be issued, they needed to have justification as to why they were going to do that. He believed there was a correct way to do this and this was not the correct way. Mr. Lehnhoff asked if the City Council would like to table this item and consider changing the existing Ordinance. Mr. Filla responded unless the Council wanted to change the Code, there was no reason to table this. Councilmember Holden stated she was not inclined to table this. She believed the applicants had moved forward with a crushed rock driveway in good faith because they believed it had been approved by the City. . ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - OCTOBER 10, 2006 8 . Councilmember Grant stated he was not in favor of changing the Code, but he was in favor of granting this variance. MOTION: Councilmember Grant moved and Mayor Aplikowski seconded a motion to approve the variance to retain the existing crushed rock driveway and should the driveway ever need to be replaced, that it be required to meet City Code. This variance approval is based on the following findings: It is a reasonable use of the property; it wi 11 not change the character of the neighborhood; and the resident relied on the building pemlit that indicated crushed rock was approved. Councilmember Grant noted the Planning Commission was correct in their findings and that Commission had little latitude in making their decision. The motion carried (3-1) (Councilmember Larson opposed). D. Motion to Approve the Arden Hills Strate2:ic Economic Development Plan Ms. Barton stated in December 2005, the City Council authorized the EDC to hire a consultant to prepare an Economic Development Strategic Plan for the City. The EDC immediately began the RFP process and in March 2006 hired DeSCo Solutions, Inc. to prepare the plan. . She indicated DeSCo, in collaboration with the EDC, gathered infoffilation through research and interviews with City Officials, key leaders and stakeholders, as well as through a city-wide survey, then used this infonnation to prepare the Economic Development Strategic Plan. She stated the EDC has since reviewed the plan and, after making some changes to the plan, has recommended adoption and implementation of this plan in and for the City of Arden Hills. She stated the EDC recommends Council move to approve the Arden Hills Economic Development Strategic Plan and authorize staff to budget for the implementation of said plan. Bruce Kunkel, EDC Chair, presented the Economic Development Strategy Plan. Councilmember Grant stated outside of TCAAP, if they tried to retain the current businesses, how would they grow. Mr. Kunkel responded it was strategic and they might not necessarily want to retain all of the existing businesses they currently had in the City as well as being strategic in attracting the kind of businesses they wanted in the City. He indicated there was a lot of growth potential through redevelopment. Councilmember Holden asked who the 12 people were that were interviewed. Ms. Barton responded it was a mixture of leaders, including Councilmembers, residents, and business people. . ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - OCTOBER 10, 2006 9 . Councilmember Larson thanked Mr. Kunkel for this presentation. He believed the recommendations for redevelopment were right on target for the City. He hoped the future Council would take this seriously and recognize the importance of this particularly with regard to TCAAP. Councilmember Holden stated this was a nice presentation and suggested they refer this to a future worksession for a discussion. Councilmember Grant thanked them for their work. MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Grant seconded a motion to refer the Arden Hills Economic Development Strategic Plan to a Council Worksession for discussion. Ms. \-Volfe stated from her perspective, she believed it would be helpful to refer this to a worksession so staff could have time to look at this and give their recommendation and comments. Mayor Aplikowski recommended the following amendment: The Council accepts the Strategic Development Plan and requests that it be moved to a worksession for a full discussion. Councilmember Holden stated she did not accept the amendment and she wanted her motion to . stand as stated. The motion carried (3-1) (Mayor Aplikowski opposed). E. Motion to Approve a Contract with SRF to Prepare an Alternative Urban Area- Wide Review for the Redevelopment of the Twin Cities Armv Ammunition Plant Ms. Barton stated as part of the TCAAP redevelopment, the City must complete an environnlental review of the property relating to the proposed project. Given that this property constitutes a large area and will be redeveloped over a period of years, the AUAR process will provide the best means by which to conduct this review. She noted in September the master developer for the project, CRR, issued an RFP for consulting services relating to a number of tasks associated with the TCAAP redevelopment: Master Plamling, Traffic hllpact Study, AUAR Environmental Study, Stage One, PUD, and Development of a Landscape Plan. The RFP was issued encompassing all of these tasks to streamline the process and allow for effective integration and collaboration amongst the fimls responding. She indicated City staff, along with Ryan employees, interviewed four finns relating to these tasks. City stan' is recommending the City contract with SRF to prepare the City's AUAR Environmental Study in the amount ofSI47,318. . ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - OCTOBER 10, 2006 10 . Councilmembel' Holden stated she was having a hard time understanding why the City had to take on this responsibility and not the developer. Ms. Barton responded the EQB required that a responsible government unit oversee the AUAR process, which in this case was the City of Arden Hills. She stated there was also likely to be a lot of attention paid to this environmental review by various organizations and to ensure that the document was kept beyond reproach, it was best to be contracted through the City and not the developer who had a vested interest in how that environmental review came out. Councilmember Holden asked why the City did not take the responsibility to set up the interview process instead of Ryan arranging everything. Ms. Barton responded for making the process go more smoothly, efficient, and economical it made sense to do the interview process for all six firms at once. Councilmembel' Grant stated he had the same concerns as Councilmember Holden. He asked how they an-ived at the amount. Ms. Barton responded that was the number they submitted with the RFP and there had been no negotiations on the amount. Councilmember Larson indicated he believed staff had been very wise in how they have set this up. He noted these documents were very important to the public when approving a new development and staff had recognized the importmlt of having an amlS length relationship with the developer. He believed this was a smart move on the City's pm1 to do this. . Mayor Aplikowski agreed this safeguarded the integrity of the City. Councilmember Holden requested a memorandum of what the process really was. She asked where they were at. Ms. \-Volfe stated as part of getting this consulting team in place, they would submit timelines and the steps involved. She stated these timelines and steps would be forwarded to Council. Councilmember Holden requested the RFP infort11ation also. MOTION: Councilmember Grant moved and Mayor Aplikowski seconded a motion to approve a contract with SRF, Inc. for possible future preparation of an AUAR review relating to the Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant such awarding of thc contract shall be subject to future Council approval and subject to a funding formulary with the developer. Mayor Aplikowski stated she did not like the word "possible". Councilmembel' Grant suggested removing the \vord possible and changing to a "future preparation.'" Councilmember Larson stated he could not support the motion. He stated the condition regarding having an agreement in place that allowed for reimbursement of the City was something that came at the time when the contract was brought forward for approval. He stated . here all they were doing was to authorize staff to go forward mld develop a contract for an AUAR to be brought back to Council for approval. At that point, the expectation would be that ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - OCTOBER 10, 2006 11 . the developer would pay for this. He stated he did not see the point in doing this now. Councilmember Grant responded he wanted to ensure the AUAR was not started without COllnci I approval. Mr. Filla recommended the following wording for the motion: "Approve the negotiation of the contract with SRF, Inc. to prepare an AUAR review relating to the Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant (TCAAP), subject to contract approval by the City Council and further subject to a funding source by City Council." Council accepted the amended motion wording by Mr. Filla. The amended motion carried unanimously (4-0). F. Appointment of Gre2:ory Hoa2: as Public Works Director Ms. Wolfe stated staff was recommending Gregory Hoag be appointed as the City's Public Works Director. MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Grant seconded a motion to approve Gregory Hoag as the Public Works Director. The motion carried unanimously (4-0). . G. Motion to Approve a Contract with Stephen J. Bubul of Kennedv & Graven Chartered to Provide Le2:al Services Relatin2: to the Purchase of the Twin Cities Armv Ammunition Plant Ms. Barton stated in preparation for the purchase of the Twin Cities Anny Ammunition Plant (TCAAP), staff has detemlined it is prudent and necessary to enlist the services of an attorney and law firm specializing in master development contracts and public financing. After interviewing a number of attomeys and checking references, staff is recommending Stephen Bubul of Kennedy & Graven Charatered be hired on a contractual basis to provide legal services relating to the preparation of a Master Development Agreement and public financing. She recommended Council approve contracting with Stephen Bubul of Kennedy & Graven Chartered for legal services relating to the purchase ofthe Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant. Councilmember Holden asked what will be the relationship of the City's attorney versus this attorney. Ms. Wolfe responded there would be specific tasks assigned to this attomey who had specialized experience in drafting master development contracts. She stated the City Attorney would be assisting with local aspects and review. Councilmember Holden asked who oversaw everything. Ms. Wolfe responded she viewed this . as separate tasks by specialized attomeys being managed by City staff, but if there was a need to coordinate, the City Attomey would do that. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - OCTOBER 10, 2006 12 . Mr. Filla stated he envisioned this thc same way and ifhe was needed he would be available, but stafTwould coordinate the attorneys. MOTION: Councilmember Larson moved and Mayor Aplikowski seconded a motion to authorize staff to enter into an agreement for services with Stephen J. Bubul of Kennedy & Graven Chartered bascd on the letter dated September 8, 2006 from Mr. Bubul, not to exceed S50,000 with the intention of recovering all costs in the interim and master agreements. Ms. Wolfe stated staff understood Council's expectations m1d they would do their best to carry them out. Councilmember Holden stated they had decided awhile ago not to spend current resident's money, but they had been spending resident's money and they needed to be cautious about this. Councilmember Larson stated he did not remember them having a motion on this and he believed all residents shared in City costs. He indicated they did not want to divide the City by residents who lived north of Highway 96 and south of Highway 96. Councilmember Holden stated she did not agree with Councilmember Larson and she recalled the discussion differently. . lVIayor Aplikowski stated it was not realistic to think that the City would not spend money on TC AAP, but the City would be careful with any funds spent. She stated the City was recouping everything they could from the development team, but there would be some things the City would end up paying for. The motion can"ied unanimously (4-0). 8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. TCAAP Ms. Barton updated on the Council on recent TCAAP developments. 9. COUNCIL COMMENTS AND REQUESTS A. Councilmember Grant stated the Prope11y Task Maintenance Force had completed its work and would be fOlwarding its recommendation to Council in the future. MOTION: Councilmember Grant moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a motion to adjourn to a closed session to discuss the Rochon Corporate . Arbitration/Mediation case, pursuant to MS 13D.05 Subd 3.b. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - OCTOBER 10,2006 13 . Mayor Aplikowski adjoumed the Regular City Council Meeting at 9:27 p.m. ~~. LUii~~ Beverly ikowski Michelle Wolfe Mayor City Administrator NOTICE OF MEETINGS The next Council Meeting will be held Monday, October 30,2006 at 7:00 p.m. at the Arden Hills Council Chambers. . . Page I of I Jackie Freppert =....h.... ..........N=^....=^.....~y.y=....^., .....^ .....hN... "v=". ....~~ "'y".. .~^...N... ......".. ...N".V""=". ~~^.....=YY. ......... ..~^.. From: Jackie Freppert Sent: Thursday, November 30,200612:08 PM To: bob.fletcher@co.ramsey.mn.us; bulletin@lillienews.com; cwilson@ctv15.org; dorrick@pioneerpress.com; dprobst@mspmac.org; focus@mnsun.com; kmaltman@msn.com; mlsmith@startribune.com; smoran@startribune.com; ssch roeder@smithmicrotech.com; timesaver02@aol.com Subject: 12/06/06 Planning Commission Agenda Jackie A. Frcppen Office Support Specialist Phone 651.634.5130 Fax 651.634.5137 Jackie. freppert@ci.arden-hills.mn.us \YWWcCi arde..D.:-hllLs IJJD l,L~ 11/30/2006