HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-20-07 Agenda Item 2A, City Hall Repair Update
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
August 20, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: 2.A.
Mayor and City Council n . I\~ n
Michelle Wolfe, City Administrator ~
City Hall Repairs
BACKGROUND
As Council knows, we recently reached a settlement regarding the City Hall. And, we recently
completed repairs to the chinmey. Building Official Dave Scherbel has worked with the Finance
Department to compute our costs to-date relating to the City Hall construction. This information
is cumulative from 200 I until present. The data is attached for your reference.
There are still repairs needed for the building. The fIrm of Wiss, J armey, Elstner Associates Inc.
(WJE) has prepared the attached report to outline the needed repairs and options. Brian Pashina
of WJE will be present on Monday evening to review his report with you. At that time, he will
also have cost estimates.
At this time, the City needs to determine which options to pursue in terms of the additional
needed repairs. We will then solicit quotes (or bids if appropriate) for completing the work.
DIRECTION REQUESTED
Provide direction in terms of which repair options staff should pursue for City Hall.
MW
Ilmetro-inetlordenhillslAdminlCity AdministratorlMemoI200718-20-07 Memo RE City Hall Repairs. doc
~
EN HILLS
~
August 10, 2007
City of Arden Hills
Statement of Costs
1) Insurance costs
2) Landscaping
3) Mechanical costs
4) Mise!. Costs
5) Professional Services
6) Repairs Completed
8) Special Inspection Services
Total of above
Balance due for chimney recladding
(approximate)
Total approximate costs for City hall repair
$11,500.00
$22,778.15
$28,922.31
$12,773.43
$182,887.32
$52299.50
$133,882.75
$445,043.46
$90,000.00
$535,043.46
\\Metro-inet.us\ardenhills\Building\City Hall\City Hall costs\City Hall costs\Full Document8-10-07.doc
.1-
February 13, 2007
Arden Hills City Hall Construction Costs
Total City hall costs with change orders (inc. CO #8)
Paid to date
Deduct sand cost in CO # 8 (to be paid by Architectural Alliance)
Balance due
$3,130,343.93
$3,048,323.93
$12,724.00
$69,296.00
(below is taken li'omArchitectural Alliance's pay summary dated 12/12/02)
p ftlO" (
ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM
NetChange-bY-GI'1<3.ng~:qrders
Som.to.Oate.
Total Comph3ted-c:tnCl'St()re.d
----~ R~tEiinc:lg~
-----,=otal-Earhe'(j:IE!S$Retaillage
Less PreviousCe.rtificates
Curre.ntPaymij:nt])u&
------~ Balance:tqFini$h
PerC$ntcige.Oomplete.
CHANGE ORDE~ $UMMARY
Chahge:OrdQrNo~ .1
ChangeqrderNo..2
ChangeOrderNo,3
ChahgeOrdeiN()~4
Change Order No..tj
Change Order No.6
ChangeQiderNQ. 7
Change..OrderNo....8
Line 1
Lihe2
Line 3
Line 4
LineS
Lille'S
Line 7
Lhle:8
Line-9
Date
1/22/00
4/2/01
6/4/01
6/18/01
8/14/01
10/8/01
12/20/01
12/11/02
111SPlllz
$2,942.000.00
$164.076.93
$3,106.076.93
$3.065.507.96
$17.184.03
$3.048,323.93
$2.918.510.28
$129,813.65
.._~57.753.00
$20,672.00
$3,876.00
$24.267.00
Change order # 8 (Pay application # 19) has not been paid
but is included in the balance due above
\\Metro-inet.us\ardenhills\Building\City Hall\City Hall costs\City Hall costs\Full Document8-10-07.doc Page 2 of 12
7/10/02
7/07/03
9/01/04
5/05/05
11042915
11044929
11049917
11044929
August 10, 2007
Insurance cost
Lobby area
Basement leaks
Roof releaking
Basement conduit leak
Total current paid
$5,000.00- deduct payment
$5,000.00- deduct payment
? not settled, claim submitted
$1,500.00- City clean up cost
$11,500.00
\\Metro-inet.us\ardenhills\Building\City Hall\City Hall costs\City Hall costs\Full Document8-10-07.doc Page 3 of 12
August 10, 2007
Landscaping
Paid as per original contract
Paid Margolis
Paid Minn. Native landscapes
$22,778.15
$17,702.00
$12,350.00
Total of above
$52,830.15
Deduct Margolis & Mn Native Landscapes
$30,052.00
Resulting overpayment by City of Arden Hills
$22,778.15
The City of Arden Hills paid Rochon Corporation $22,778.15 for Landscaping work done
poorly and incorrectly. The City and the Architects rejected all work by the landscaping
contractor and hired Margolis & Native Landscapes to redo the work. The City seeks to
be reimbursed for payments to Rochon for the Landscaping.
\\Metro-inet.us\ardenhills\Building\City Hall\City Hall costs\City Hall costs\Full Document8-10-07.doc Page 4 of 12
August 10, 2007
Mechanical
L Johnson controls repairs
2. Commissioning
3. Recommissioning
4. Correcting deficiencies
$5,884.31
$7,468.00
$4,330.00
$11,240.00
Total of above
$28,922.31
L The Johnson Controls repairs are repairs that are directly related to improper
installation (installations not to specifIcations) of the Arden Hills mechanical
system.
2. The commissioning is the fee charged by Johnson Controls to conduct a
commissioning ofthe Cities mechanical system. The commissioning was an
original requirement of the contract the City had with Rochon Corporation, but
was never done. City Staff moved into the building in October of 200 1. After
experiencing numerous problems with the mechanical system, almost on a daily
basis, the City hired Johnson Controls to do a commissioning. At there
suggestion, City Staff reviewed our contract with Rochon for any requirements
for commissioning. Staff discovered that a commissioning was a requirement of
the original contract documents. Staff discovered this after we had hired Johnson
controls to do the commissioning. This was in January 0[2003. A full 14 months
after the City took occupancy of the building.
3. The recommissioning was done due to the fact that the contractor had stated that
all of the necessary repairs had been completed but we were still experiencing
many problems with the system.
4. The correcting defIciencies cost were those incurred by the City to have Johnson
controls correct the mechanical problems that remained after the contractor
(Rochon & Kumar) had stated they had made the necessary repairs.
\\Metro-inet.us\ardenhills\Building\City HaU\City Hall costs\City Hall.costs\Full Document8-10-07.doc Page 5 of 12
August 10, 2007
Miscellaneous Costs
1. Ideal advertising (damaged T-shirts)
2. Paint basement walls
3. Sidewalk grate
4. Terrazzo floor
5. Kinko's
6. City hall Copy cost
7. Merrill Communications
8. Architectural Alliance
9. Merrill Communications
10. FedEx Kinko's
11. Inspec
12. Architectural Alliance
13. Architectural Alliance
14. Architectural Alliance
4/13/04
3/11/04
10/25/01
12/08/04
10/18/05
4/28/06
5/15/06
5/19/06
6/14/06
6/16/06
6/26/06
7/11106
7/11106
$852.00
$1,350.00
$319.50
$5,000.00
$90.61
$648.86
$3,245.43
$44.47
$398.83
$105.44
$260.00
$174.93
$50.76
$232.60
Total of above
$12,773.43
L Ideal advertising is the actual costs the city incurred replacing tee shirts not
covered by insurance. Tee shirts damaged during the grouting process of water
proofIng the foundation.
2. Painting of the basement walls in the storage room was to have been done as part
of the original contract. Due to the ongoing problems ofthe foundation
waterproofing the walls were not painted. After the waterproofmg was completed
we had the approval from Rochon (Jeff Wellman) to go ahead and have the
painting completed.
3. Staffwas requested by Rochon's superintendent, Kirby, to pick up a sidewalk
grate and backcharge Rochon. Reason given was that Rochon did not have an
account at the place were he needed to get the grate.
4. The Terrazzo floor has never been accepted by the City. The fInished product had
numerous areas of discoloration, swirl marks, imperfections, and low spots. The
City has with held $5,000 fInal payment for the floor.
5. Kinko's bill was for copies of Building Restoration reports
6. City Hall Copy costs was a bill for copying of City Hall f1les requested by
Tomsche, Sonnesyn& Tomsche.
7. Merrill Communications was a bill for copy costs for City hall documents for Jeff
Coleman.
\\Metro-inet.us\ardenhills\Building\City Hall\City Hall costs\City Hall costs\Full Document8-1Q..Q7.doc Page 6 of 12
8. Architectural Alliance was for copy costs for documents requested by Brian
Pashina
9. Merrill communications was for copy costs for Jeff Coleman.
10. FedEx Kinko's was for copy costs of Kasota Stone drawings for Brian Pashina.
11. Inspec bill was for consultation by Dave Campbell on the City Hall arbitration.
12. Architectural Alliance bill dated 6/26/06 for Copy fees.
13. Architectural Alliance bill dated 7/11106 for professional services.
14. Architectural Alliance bill dated 10/17/06 for re-issue professional services.
\\Metro-inet.us\ardenhills\Building\City Hall\City Hall costs\City Hall costs\Full Document8-lO-07.doc Page 7 of 12
August 10,2007
Professional Services
L Attorney
2. Mediation
3. Arbitration
4. Architectnral Alliance
5. Landscaping Services
$123,927.84
$879.48
$8,550.00
$42,530.00
$7,000.00
Total of above
$182,887.32
L Attorneys fees are for work completed on City hall construction issues.
2. Mediation fee's incurred by the city to date.
3. Arbitration fee's incurred by the City to date.
4. Architectural Alliance, are additional fee's the Architect has billed the City for
their time in trying to resolve and follow up on many construction issues not
completed correctly.
5. Landscaping services, are fee's charged by the Landscape Arch. and Arch.
Related to resolving the landscaping issues installed incorrectly.
\\Metro-inet.us\ardenhills\Building\City Hall\City Hall costs\City Hall costs\Full Document8-1 0-07 .doc Page 8 of 12
August 10, 2007
Repairs Completed
1) Repair thru wall flashing at chimney
2) repair lobby ceiling
3) repair thru wall flashing at council conference room
4) Repair/adjust interior doors
5) Chimney recladding
$9,080.00
$1,216.00
$11,375.00
$922.00
$29,706.50
Total of above
$52,299.50
1) The report dated 10/22/04 by Building Restoration. An area of the building that
had numerous water intrusions since the building was built.
2) For interior repairs ofthe lobby ceiling related to the 10/22/04 report
3) The report dated 5/24/04 by Building Restoration. An area of the building that had
several water intrusions since the building was built.
4) This cost is for Kraus Anderson to do repairs on doors that have been a problem
since the building was built.
5) 5) For recladding chimney. First payment only
\\Metro.inetus\ardenhills\Building\City Hall\City Hall costs\City Hall costs\Full Document8-lO-07.doc Page 9 ofl2
1. McCalla (struct)
2. Core drill rental
3. Inspec
4. Inspec
5. AET
6. Inspec
7. AET
8. Air Tech
9. AET
10. AET
11. AET
12. Inspec
13. Inspec
14. Inspec
15. Rentals
16. BRC
17. W JE
18.KA
19. WJE
20. WJE
21. BRC
22. WJE
23. BRC
24. WJE
25.WJE
26. WJE
27. WJE
28. WJE
29. WJE
30. WJE
31. WJE
32. WJE
33. Const. Results
Total of above
August 10, 2007
Special Inspection Services
8/01/01
8/21/01
10/4/01
8/31/03
11/25/03
11/25/03
12/30/03
12/30/03
3/09/04
7/27/04
8/13/04
8/23/04
10/29/04
11/26/04
8/4/05
1/18/06
1/27/06
2/27/06
3/17/06
3/23/06
5/15/06
8/14/06
7/30/06
9/18/06
10/19/06
12/14/06
1/17/07
3/8/07
4/25/07
4/25/07
6/20/07
6/28/07
$200.00
$125.68
$1,430.00
$875.98
$6,091.52
$130.00
$1,850.96
$1,565.00
$1,405.00
$550.00
$409.80
$130.00
$130.00
$390.00
$130.27
$340.00
$6,500.00
$7,146.00
$19,866.75
$9,110.91
$4,675.00
$25,294.00
$1,460.00
$8,412.35
$4,469.57
$950.00
$3,125.00
$1,677.00
$4,542.09
$6,911.89
$1,063.50
$8,529.48
$4,395.00
$133,882.75
1. Mc Calla bill dated 8/01/01 was required by the waterproofIng manufacturer to
verify that the leaking in the basement did not come from structural cracks.
\\Ivletro-inet.us\ardenhil1s\Building\City Hall\City Hall costs\City Hall costs\Full Document8-W..07.doc Page 10 of 12
2. Staff rented a drill 8/21/01 to do a core drill thru the floor to help determine ifthe
water infiltration was corning up thru the floor.
3. Inspec bill 10/4/01 was for investigative reporting on foundation waterproofIng.
4. Inspec bill dated 8/31/03 was for follow up investigation on thru wall flashing at
the top of the foundation wall.
5. AET bill dated 11/25/03 was for mold investigation report for the lower leveL
6. Inspec bill dated 11/25/03 was for follow up investigation on thru wall flashing at
the top ofthe foundation wall.
7. AET bill dated 12/30/03 was for mold investigation report for the lobby ceiling.
8. Air Tech bill was for indoor air testing for quality/mold.
9. AET bills dated 3/9 for follow up investigation of mold mildew in the building.
10. AET bills dated 7/12 for follow up investigation of mold mildew in the building.
11. AET bills dated 8/13/04 for follow up investigation of mold mildew in the
building.
12. Inspec's bills dated 8/23/04 was for consultation of continued water infIltration
tssues.
13. Inspec's bills dated 10/29/04 was for consultation of continued water infIltration
issues.
14. Inspec's bills dated 11/26/04 was for consultation of continued water infiltration
Issues.
15. Rentals was for a lift to repair lobby ceiling.
16. BRC bill dated 8/4/05 was to investigate the parapet caps for proper sealant and
installation.
17. WJE bill dated 1/18/06 was to do background research on the water infIltration
problems at City Hall.
18. KA bill dated 1/27/06 was to build a heated enclosure for the water testing.
19. WJE bill dated 2/27/06 was for water testing, phase 2
20. WJE bill dated 3/1 7/06 was for water testing phase 2
21. BRC bill dated 3/23/06 was for removal ofthe stone for testing
\\Metro-inetus\ardenhills\Building\City Hall\City Halt costs\City Hall costs\Full Document8-lO-07.doc Page II of 12
22. WJE for additional testing recently completed & in progress
23. BRC bill dated 8/14//06 was for removal of the stone for testing
24. WJE bill dated 7/30/06 was for water testing,
25. WJE bill dated 9/18/06 was for water testing, investigation
26. WJE bill dated 10/19/06 was for water testing, investigation
27. WJE bill dated 12/14/06 was for arbitration related services
28. WJE bill dated 1/17/07 was for chinmey repair design
29. WJE bill dated 3/8/07 was for chinmey repair design.
30. WJE bill dated 4/25/07 was for chinmey repair design
31. WJE bill dated 4/25/07 was for chimney repair design
32. WJE bill dated 6/20/07 was for chinmey repair desigu
33. Construction Results for lobby repair.
\\Metro-inet.us\ardenhills\Building\City Ha11\City Hall costs\City Hall costs\Full DocumentS-1O...Q7.doc Page 12 of 12
WJE
Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc.
600 Highway 169 South, Suite 1520
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55426
952.545.0295 tel [952.544.6954 fax
www.wje.com
MEMORANDUM
Via: Email
To: Michelle Wolfe
From: Brian Pashina
Date: 14 August 2007
Project: Arden Hills City Hall
WJE No. 2005.5144.3
Subject: City Council work session on 20 August 2007
The attached document is intended to serve as background information for the City Council work session
to be held at the Arden Hills City Hall at 5:00 p.m. on 20 August 2007. Approximate costs and details can
be discussed at the meeting.
document3
WJE
ARDEN HILLS CITY HALL BUILDING
City Council Work Session on 20 August 2007
1245 West Highway 96
Arden Hills, Minnesota
14 August 2007
WJE No. 2005.5144.3
Prepared for:
City of Arden Hills
Prepared by:
Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc.
ARDEN HILLS CITY HALL BUILDING
City Council Work Session on 20 August 2007
1245 West Highway 96
Arden Hills, Minnesota
INTRODUCTION
This document presents factual information, opinions, aud costs to be used during a City Council work
session to be held at 5:00 p.m. on 20 August 2007 at the Arden Hills City Hall building located at 1245
West Highway 96 in Arden Hills, Minnesota.
BACKGROUND
An investigation was performed by Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc. (WJE) in 2006 aud included a
review of available documents, a limited visual condition survey of the interior aud exterior sides of
exterior walls, inspection of as-built conditions at inspection openings, water testing of exterior masonry
walls and windows, aud preparation of a final report dated 22 February 2006, with opinions and
recommendations. Repair specifications and drawings for recladding the chimney, dated 17 February
2007, were also prepared by WJE. The chimney recladding work was completed this summer by
Building Restoration Corporation (BRC). Subsequent to the recladding work by BRC, BRC cut additional
inspection openings in the exterior masonry walls for City personnel and WJE to observe the condition of
the relieving augles.
The following summarizes the results of the investigation performed by WJE in 2006:
I. As demonstrated by testing, water intrusion occurring along the south foundation wall is due to
defects in the through-wall flashing system installed at the base of the wall. These defects permit
water which collects within the wall drainage cavity to bypass the through-wall flashing and migrate
into the occupied spaces below. Presently, water intrusion to the lower level has been identified at
two locations: at one location on the east foundation wall, and at another location at the east end of
the south foundation waiL
2. The cause of past water leakage through the north facing wall located above the main level
conference room is unclear. Potential causes of the leakage are water penetrating the joints in the
coping stones, in combination with improper flashing at the top of the wall, and water entering the
wall cavity through improperly lapped felt paper. Leakage through the flashing which was installed in
2005 by BRC does not appear to be a cause. No recent leakage has been observed at this location.
3. Deficiencies exist in the through-wall flashing above the windows on the south elevation of the
building. Defects include the absence of proper end dams in the flashing, poor adhesion of the
flashing to the steel surface at terminations, discontinuities of the steel sunscreen bracket plates,
unsealed penetrations through the building paper, and the flashing terminating short of the exterior
face of the waiL Surface corrosion was observed on the steel under the membraue flashing,
indicating water has bypassed the membraue flashing in the past.
WJE
ENGINEERS
ARCH ITEeTS
MATERIALS SCIENTISTS
Arden Hills City Hall Building
City Council Wark Session on 20 August 2007
14 August 2007
Page 3
4. Painted steel masonry relieving angles were installed on the exterior walls instead of the specified
hot-dipped galvanized steel angles. The original design did not specify flashing or weep ropes at the
relieving angles; however, through-wall flashing and weep ropes were installed at the relieving
angles. This membrane through-wall flashing terminates approximately Y. inch from the outer toe of
the relieving angle and approximately 2 inches from the exterior face of the wall. With the flashing
terminating within the wall, water is not permitted to completely exit the wall system and therefore
the flashing is ineffective. In addition, by terminating the flashing within the wall, the painted steel
angles are exposed to moisture. Recently created inspection openings revealed significant corrosion
occurring at the ends of the angles.
5. The as-built construction of the stone coping varied from the shop drawings prepared by Mankato
Kasota Stone, Inc. and the design drawings in several ways:
a. An overhang with drip edge was not provided on the backside of the coping stones as shown on
both the design and shop drawings. The absence of an overhang with drip edge would permit
water to run across the face of the sealant and result in reduced sealant life.
b. The specified anchors used to secure the stone to the underlying parapet wall do not appear to be
installed.
c. There is visible evidence of unaccomodated movement (i.e., separations and bowing) at one
location due to the apparent absence of expansion joints, in combination with inadequate
anchorage of the coping stones.
REPAIR
Refer to the attached table that presents repair alternatives and costs.
OJJr---r---.r
.5gg ~
::S:NN~
'5 t::: t) e..
~ 6h 51
::::: ::l :::I
~<<
~O...
~.N _
.- e
U e
"" e
G .8
"' ~
~
e .
.'"
~~
::<
'0
e
e
o
U
p
U
~
I-
~
j:
z
w
iJ
;Q b :;:
IoU W ~
Z t: ;;2
- :t w
~ ~ t;:
w'" ::;
w.J
~'
r;
~'O
~ "
~ E
'",J;
~ '"
'" "
.. Q.
t:;; .~
~ '"
.;
.... Q.
.. ~
:E Q
.. "
E-:=
~
-
"
~
"
:!
-
"
"
-
Q
...
t:
1: Q
..U
Q.'"
~]
..
.;
Q.
~
e
..8
..ct)tl3
o V "'0
.D..c S
~~tB
gp~ ~
:a.5 0
gj '0 gj
0:: a E
=-v
tU ca 't
~ ~ tJ
.o.....e
""00
" " 0
e ~ ~
.s ..0 p.
8 ~ ~
"'~-
o.Q)~
~]s
"
,s
]!: C
s.- 0
c~ -g
"" -
~~ ~
o = ~
~.~ -;
~ 'j:;
~"O ~
"0 S ".
_[) cE e
_ "
[) ~ s
~ IV <Il f;,
.9]]~
o ~.;!? IV
C .p ,5 OJ)
.- ,,- '"
IV 0 '"' F=
bll<llO;j
~ IV 'C "'0
~.p~U
~ c'- ~
"H~B~~
;:sccv,,2
.5.S:.9 :s
13 1;;.1::'t/l ~
o () "0 ~ ...
u..2~p....s
- N
=
.S
-
:0
"
Q
U
:q
. ~
"0 '..0
i&
.0 "
-:;'0
o 0
~-
QJ)Q)gp
5..g:a
-;..!!!~
u'ii'+=
~:::ca
-"="
~.9 I
-:~fn
.g c ::l
" " 0
::<<E,S
e
~
-
"
0;
z
-
~
z
'"
""
'0
..2
gj>
:E
~
'"
0::
l
.
.0
""
"
o
,s
..
~
i5.
~
~
U "'0 ~ ~
oS a s~
5 'ii r.g E
"'0 ~ OJ)'+-<
~ '+-< .5:',
.s 0 c: ~
CIl Q) 'a.5
<Il "0 tl7S
] ~ ': ~ ~
-..;;:j 0 .... ""
~'2"t:: '{;; a
E'-HB ~:a
c:S'S~~a
O'C .9,.d Q)
'€ B ~'2"Ob"5
".E "'... a E
o 0 -" "
So..... ] 5 4) ;>
1:~ ~ ] ] ~
.=s:g ~.5 t; :E
~ t'3 ~ .s 8 'Vi
c 11) .- en
:e .- ;s ~ (g ~
'1:l S ~ E l::';
~~~.g8a
<"i
=
o
~
'0
=
.~
"
;. ""
o =
~~
~ ':;
0.0
~t;
'0"
gp]
:E,s
gj "
u: 5;
N
"
0;
z
"
o
'"
@-
'0
a
.n.
~gp
gp.-
",.0
- gj
=0::
-;3 -
Q.-;
'0 :<
a..6
a ~
" 0
-..2
u_
~
"
}
:<
o ""
0; =
<Il.D ~
..2 "2L-,
OJ)co:lt:j
a gp 2
"0.9 0
.B t'3 .....
<Il ~;g
t;c"'O
C ~ ~
.9 co:l c
~ E 0
0..... ~
t: 0 '"
o""E
o = .....
"0'2 0
Go)._ OJ;)
" '" =
.5 ti :g
'E ..... ()
o ~ e
Uo<U
N
......NM
""
=
:~ t;]
"E C <Il
0"
o~On
~'iia
]~Q)~
""'.-.s .~
.5 Q) ell c
[-:S"'2.2
+< O.!::l ~
0- ;:: oU
.~ .g ~ ~
~ ~ bb.S
c- I..s::
o ~ 15 ~
U Cd;::l:j:;
'""
"
0;
Z
"
0;
Z
.0
o
oUzF :E
.E = :<
'S '0 "0
0......,"'0 0
1-0 "0 a.:: 1:l
.g, a .r 5-"
::t (I) ~ ~ e
OoU_(I)~
..2 15 a1 ~ 0
- - ..., rIl e
oU rIl "0 oU ~
~.Ef~~b
;:: o..<.f! rIl"O
.s8+<~~
;:: +< 0._ ~
';oClg.e
EcoUo..g
~.g5~o
C':l 0 0'- S
~ 8.~ ~ 8
g~fr~oU
_._ 1-0 1-<.0
Q.
OJ)'!:::
='0
's'.s
o ._
o :<
""""
..5 ~ oil
.~ -S.S
,,".0
oU E; ~
lS~::
Q.Q.-
~ e ~
'0 Q. .
=.0.0
C':l."';::: g{l
" :< 0
E;~.s
E = '0
~~a
]
" "
E '"
0-;
~ "
l;j~
~ 0
~ ~
~ -
OJ)~
=
'a~
o ._
o ;.,
..... =
o '"
- Q.
= E
S 8
~ g
0""
s ."';:::
'0 :<
" ~
" "
= 0
Cl~
8..2
.....
o
-"
]
s
Ol
'.g
"
0;
Q.
~
"
=
.~
<;
'0
S
'0
e
's
or
e
.oa
-
" "
~ .g
:< ~
'0 "
a ~
~ ~
" ""
'0 ;::
......, 'a
- pO
fa ._~
c;;f;o
" 0_
~-;::
o ca 0
,,:<5
.sg~
vi .; .5 P..
=~ c.~
.- 0 0 "0
.~ 3'~ 0
i;l -E'" ,,;S
t oU ~ ~
o I-< oU 0
e ~ o..~
;.,
'0 ~
oUE--g
""~~
'" -
- "
0.0.0
"fi t:_
a&~
N
.,f
M
-,s
o ~ a'-
~c_:::
::t'o ~ b!)
"0......, ~ a
~.S"'2 -s
c Vi 0 0
~ ~.g E;
OJ) ~ ~ tl
.5 oU "0 Cl.l
g.~ag
o 0.. ~ oU
r.;...OCl.lrll
o a~~
-..... -
50,gB4.l
E8~g.gp
~5 "O~
o rIl "0 ~._
~-aa:=-6
'"
oil
.S
-
"
"
E
=
.9
~
~
"
~
-i::
o
"
"
.0
-
"
-i::
o
"
~
:s
,.,
<E
'0
"
'0
'S:
~
"
.D
S
-
'"
o
"
~
.e-
'"
;,;~
"
-
o
Z