The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About09-05-07-PC Chair David Sand Commissioners Andrew Holewa Clayton Larson Liz Modeselte Janet Stodola Roberta Thompson Clayton Zimmerman 1245 W. Highway 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112 651.792.7800 www.cLarden-hills.mn.us Arden Hills Planning Commission September 5, 2007 City Vision A strong community that values our unique environment, our fiscal soundness, and our tradition as a desirabie cit in which to live, work, and play. Agenda Planning Commission Convenes 6:30 PM Call to Order 1. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA 2. MINUTES A. August 1, 2007 Meeting 3. PLANNING CASES A. Planning Case 07-020; Variance; Edward Bacig; 1185 Benton Way - Not a Public Hearing B. Planning Case 07-021; Variance; Anthony Rakow; 1907 County Road D - Not a Public Hearing C. Planning Case 07-022; Conditional Use Permit Amendment and Site Plan Review; Bethel University; 3900 Bethel Drive - Public Hearing D. Planning Coco 07 023; Varianco; Frank 8. Christina Pictotnik; 1163 Bonton \^Jay Not CI Public HOC/ring WITHDRAWN E. Planning Case 07-018; Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development for Phase 1, Preliminary Plat, and Finai Plat; Arden Plaza LLC; 3527 Lexington Ave N - Public Hearing 4. UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS A. Miniature Horses B. Zoning Code Amendments a. Lot Coverage Regulations - Postponed b. RV Outside Storage Reguiations - Postponed 5. REPORTS A. 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update B. Report from the City Councii C. Planning Commission Comments and Requests 6. ADJOURNMENT A quorum of the City Council may be present at this meeting. Planning Cases are available online at: http://www.ci.arden-hills.mn.us/pla nn inqcases ~ ~HILLS I September 5,2007 Planning Case Map ~ o 0.15 0.3 0.6 Mile ~ ~HILLS MEMORANDUM DATE: September 5, 2007 PC Agenda Item 3.A TO: Planning Commission James Lelmhoff, City Plannerff Planning Case #07-020 Variance Edward Bacig 1185 Benton Way FROM: SUBJECT: ATTACHMENTS: 3A-I Application and Supporting Materials 3A-2 Air Photo and Photographs ofthe Site Reqnested Action The applicant is requesting three variances to construct a 691 square foot addition to a dwelling at 1185 Benton Way: . Encroach four feet into the sonthern side yard setback; . Increase the lot's structure coverage from 18.2 percent to 25.7 percent; and, . Reduce the landscaped area on the lot from 65.1 percent to 58.3 percent. The three variances are contingent upon each other. Backl!ronnd 1. Overview of Reqnest The applicant owns a 1,465 sqnare foot dwelling at 1185 Benton Way, which is located south of Harriet Avenue and west of Lexington Avenue in the southeastern part of the City. Of the 1,465 square feet ofliving space in the existing space, 1,045 are on the main floor and 420 square feet of finished space are in the basement. He is proposing to construct a 691 square foot addition to the dwelling (431 sqnare feet on the main floor and 260 sqnare feet on the upper floor). The house with the proposed addition wonld have 2,156 square feet. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor September 5, 2007 \\Metro-inet.uslardenhillslP/anninglPlanning Cases\2007107-020 Bacig Variance\090507 - PC Report - Bacig Variance. doc Page 1 of9 With the proposed addition, the applicant is requesting three variances. Due to the design of the proposed addition, all three conditions are contingent upon each other. The proposed addition would: . Encroach four feet into the southern side yard setback where nine feet would be required; . Increase the lot's structure coverage from 18.2 percent to 25.7 percent where 25 percent is the limit; and, . Reduce the landscaped area on the lot from 65.1 percent to 58.3 percent where 65 percent is the minimum. The existing 514 square feet detached garage would remain unchanged. The applicant has submitted a letter addressing the variance criteria, a site plan ofthe property, and elevations of the existing and proposed structure (Attachment 3A-I). Although the applicant's letter states that the property is in the R-2 Zone, the property is actually in the R-3 Zone. This typo does not impact the applicant's proposal. There are no previous variance requests on file for this property. The property is within the Hunters Park Homeowners Association, which plays a role in the variance process and is discussed in more detail in the below section. 2. Site Data Low Density Residential Single Detached Home R-3: Townhouse and Low-density Multiple Dwelling District .19 Acres (8,250 square feet) The property gently increases in elevation from southwest to northeast. 3. Surrounding Area West Commercial B-2: General Business District Single Family Detached Residential Shared common area for the homeowner's association Single Family Detached Residential Office Building North Low Density Residential South Low Density Residential East Low Density Residential City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor September 5, 2007 IlMetro-inet.us\ardenhillslP/anninglPlanning Cases\2007\07-020 Bacig VariancelO90507 - PC Report - Bacig Variance.doc Page 2 of9 Hunters Park Homeowner's Association In the early 1970s, the City approved a Planned Unit Development (PUD) to create the Hunters Park neighborhood and homeowner's associations. The single family portion of Hunters Park is built on approximately 29 acres of which seven acres are shared green space, almost three acres are used for shared driveways, and the remaining 19 acres are divided into 84 single-family residential homes. A PUD can permit a great amount of flexibility for developments from the underlying zoning regulations. The Arden Hills Town Homes on Hamline Avenue, the Edgewater Estates near the southeastern corner of Round Lake, and the Town Homes of Lake Valentine on County Road E2 are residential Planned Unit Developments. The Hunters Park PUD used the flexibility permitted in the PUD process, and the neighborhood was designed with varying lot sizes, structure setbacks, and lot coverages. Lots in the neighborhood range in size from 4,356 square feet to 32,670 square feet with a median lot size of 7,187 square feet (half the lots are above and half the lots are below this size). A number of the lots were permitted to have structures that did not meet the underlying zoning requirements, which is a legitimate use of the PUD process. Because the lot sizes and building locations were approved as part of the PUD process, they are not considered nonconforming even if they do not meet the underlying R-3 zoning requirements. In flexible PUD developments like the Hunters Park neighborhood, it is not uncommon for the PUD to include an alternative set of regulations that supersede the underlying zoning regulations. For example, the recently approved Traverse Business Center had a specific set of design standards that replaced most of the regular Gateway Business (GB) zoning regulations. In the case of the Hunters Park, alternative lot layout standards were not created, which means that the underling R-3 regulations were left in place. Since most of the structures and lots do not meet the R-3 Zoning regulations, virtually any change to the structures in Hunters Park required a variance and a PUD amendment. Furthermore, it can be difficult to apply the R-3 regulations to lot sizes that do not meet the minimum R-3 lot size. The City Council considered approving an alternative set of regulations for the Hunters Park neighborhood in 1985 (Planning Case 85-010). However, it was determined that an alternative set of regulations for Hunters Park should not be created because the lots and structure layouts were so varied in the original PUD that it would be very difficult to create a standard that is less complicated than the existing process. The City Council did, however, approve a process for evaluating future changes to structures in Hunters Park: 1. If additions or alterations to the homes do not require setback or coverage variances from the R-3 Zone, only a building permit issued administratively by the City shall be required. This removed the need for a PUD amendment with every change. 2. If additions or alterations to cluster homes do require additional variances of any kind from the R-3 Zone, the standard variance procedure set by the City shall apply. 3. In both cases, the Architectural and Environmental Committee of the Hunter's Park Homeowners Association shall review and approve the proposed addition or City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor September 5,2007 \\Metro.inet.uslardenhil/sIPlanningiP/anning Cases\2007\07-020 Bacig Variancel090507 - PC Report - Bacig Variance.doc Page3of9 alteration before submitting the same to the City. It shall assist individual homeowners in determining if a variance is required for proposed alterations. According the planning case files, the Hunters Park homeowner association approved this process along with the City. Since many of the lots are and structures are "nonconforming" under the R-3 regulations, a variance is still almost always required. There have been at least three variances approved for additions in the Hunters Park neighborhood; however, past variance approvals are not a basis for current variance reviews. Plan Evaluation 1. R-3 Regulations, Existing Conditions, and Proposed Redevelopment The lot is 8,250 square feet, 55 feet wide, and 150 feet long, Although approved as part of the Hunters Park PUD, the lot does not meet the minimum size requirements in the R-3 Zone. A. Lot Size & Dimensions The existing dwelling meets the R -3 structure setback requirements. The existing detached accessory structure encroaches into the front yard and southern side yard setbacks; however, no changes are proposed to the accessory structure. 2. Minimum Lot Size (ft, width/de th 3. Hei ht ft. 4. Lot Covered b Structure 5. Min. Landsca e Lot Area 6. Minimum Building Setbacks ft 85/120 35 25% 65% B. Structure Setbacks - Variance required 5/15 In the R-3 Zone, a total of fifteen feet is required 10 between the two side yard setbacks with at least Side Yard Corner 40 five feet on one side. With the proposed addition, the northern side yard structure setback would remain at approximately six feet; however, the southern side yard setback would be reduced from the current 11.5 feet to five feet. The total side setback would be reduced from the current 17.5 feet to eleven feet. 40 30 10 C. Lot Coverage - Variance Required The existing structure coverage does not exceed the R-3 coverage limitations. With the proposed addition, the structure coverage would increase to 25.7 percent of the lot from the current 18.9 percent, which is slightly exceeds the 25 percent limit. Landscape area is proposed to be reduced to 58.3 percent from 65.1 percent, which is below the 65 percent landscaping requirement. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor September 5, 2007 \\MetroMinet.uslardenhillsIPlanning\Planning Cases\2007\07-020 Bacig Variancel090507 M PC Report - Bacig Variance.doc Page40f9 Chart 2: Lot Coverage Existing Proposed R-3 Regulation Square feet % Square Feet % Sauare Feel I % Dwelling 1,045 12.7% 1,606 19.5% Garage 514 6.2% 514 6.2% Total Structure 1,559 18.9% 2,120 25.7% 2,063 I 25% Driveway 1,000 12.1% 1,000 12.1% Patio 323 3.9% 323 3.9% Total Lot Coverage 2,882 34.9% 3,443 41.7% 2,888 35% Remaining Landscape Area 5,368 65.1% 4,807 58.3% 5,363 65% Lot Size 8,250 8,250 8,250 In the letter submitted by the applicant, the deck and walkway were included as part of the lot coverage. When a deck is not covered and is open-slated, it is not included in the structure or lot coverage based on the City's current zoning definitions. The applicant also included the walkway in the overall lot coverage; however, the City's current landscape definition would include the walkway as part of the landscape area. The screen porch is included as part of the overall structure coverage, and the patio/stoop is part ofthe overall lot coverage. In this type of residential PUD, it is not uncommon for an individual residential lot to not conform to the lot coverage regulations. Shared green spaces are often used to offset the coverage on a lot, particularly when the lots are smaller. The Hunters Park neighborhood includes seven acres of shared private green space. It is unlikely that the neighborhood as a whole exceeds the lot coverage limitations; however, that cannot be verified without a neighborhood-wide review. D. Structure Height - Meets Requirements The existing dwelling with the proposed addition would not exceed the 35 foot height limit. 2. Flood Plain, Wetlands, and Easements The proposed addition is outside of any flood plains, wetlands, or easements. 3. Additional Review This application may require Rice Creek Watershed District approval prior to the issuance of any building permits. If the variance is approved, a condition has been added requiring RCWD review prior to the issuance of building permits. The Hunters Park Architectural and Environmental Committee, along with the two adjacent neighbors, have approved the proposed addition (Attachment 3A-I). City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor September 5,2007 IlMetro-inet.uslardenhi/ls\Planning\Planning Cases\2007107-020 Bacig Variancel090507 - PC Report - Bacig Variance.doc Page 5 of9 Variance Evaluation Criteria The criteria listed below must be used to evaluate each of the variance requests. A. Variance Review Criteria - Section 1355.04 Subd. 4.C: Variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code may be granted in instances where the strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration. Variances shall only be granted when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Code. "Undue hardship," as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means: . The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use under conditions permitted by the Zoning Code; . The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; . The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality; and, . Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Code. B. Additional Review Information: Although State Statutes include guidelines for evaluating variances, the interpretation and meaning of those Statutes have been impacted by various court decisions. A somewhat common, though apparently incorrect, interpretation of the written Statutes is that a property owner must show that they do not have reasonable use of their property without an approved variance. The difficulty with this standard is what counts as "reasonable use" of the property? Since most properties could be construed to have "reasonable use" without a variance, this standard was declared virtually insurmountable by the Court of Appeals. A revised interpretation of the "reasonable use" evaluation criteria has emerged from the Minnesota Court of Appeals. According to the City Attorney, a property owner does not need to show that reasonable use for a property only exists with an approved variance. Instead, the landowner must only demonstrate that the proposed variation is reasonable for a particular property in a given zone. For example, the property owner must only demonstrate that an addition that encroaches into a particular setback is reasonable as opposed to showing that the property would only have reasonable use with the addition. While this is a much softer interpretation of reasonable use, the applicant must still address all four variance criteria listed above. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor September 5, 2007 \\Metro-inet.uslardenhillslPlanning\Planning Cases\2007\07-020 Bacig Variancel090507 - PC Report - Bacig Variance.doc Page 6 of9 Findinl!s of Fact Staff offers the following fifteen findings of fact for review: General Findings 1. Although the 8,250 square foot lot was approved as part of the Hunters Park PUD, it does not meet the minimum requirements of the R-3 Zone. 2. The existing dwelling meets all property line setbacks. The detached garage encroaches on the front yard and southern side yard setbacks. 3. The proposed addition would reduce the combined side yard setbacks from 17.5 feet to 11.5 feet. The southern side yard setback would be reduced from 11.5 feet to five feet. The northern side yard setback would remain at six feet. A variance is required ifthe two side setbacks do not equal fifteen feet or more. 4. The proposed addition does not encroach on the rear or front setbacks. 5. The structure coverage is proposed to increase from 18.9 percent to 25.7 percent of the lot. A variance is required to exceed 25 percent structure coverage on the lot. 6. The landscape area would be reduced from 65.1 percent to 58.3 percent of the lot. A variance is required to reduce landscape area below 65 percent. 7. The dwelling with the proposed addition would not exceed the 35 foot height limit. 8. Dwellings are permitted structures within the R-3 Zone. 9. The existing dwelling and the proposed garage are outside of the roO-year flood plain, wetlands, and easements. Variance Findings: 10. A dwelling and addition are reasonable uses within the R-3 Zone. 11. The nonconforming lot size for the R-3 Zone, which was approved as part of the PUD, may present a unique situation that warrants the requested variances. There are no unique topographical conditions. 12. It is unlikely the proposed addition would have a negative impact on the property or the neighborhood. The addition will not reduce the northern side yard setback, and the southern property line is adjacent to common space that is owned by the Hunters Park Homeowner's Association. The nearest dwelling unit to the south of the subject property is approximately sixty feet away. 13. The increase lot coverage is unlikely to have a negative impact because of the shared adjacent shared green space to the south of the subject property. There is a total of seven acres of Homeowners Association common green space throughout the neighborhood. 14. The proposed plans and setback variance for the dwelling do not appear to be based on economic considerations alone. 15. The applicant has received approval from the Hunters Park Architectural and Environmental Committee for the proposed addition. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor September 5,2007 IIMetro~inel.us\ardenhills\PlanninglPlanning Cases\2007\07-020 Bacig VariancelO90507 - PC Report - Bacig Variance. doc Page 7 of9 Staff Analvsis The findings of fact for this variance requests do not specifically support a recommendation for denial or approval. A single family home is a permitted use in the R-3 Zone, and the addition is not an unreasonable use in the R-3 Zone. The variance is unlikely to create a negative impact on the neighborhood or City because there is already a structure on the property, the proposed addition will not be significantly closer to any nearby structures, and the additional lot coverage is likely offset by the shared green space throughout Hunters Park. It does not appear that the variance is based on economic considerations alone. Additionally, the property owner has received approval from the Homeowners Association for the addition. As is often the case, the evaluation criterion that states "The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner," is the difficult evaluation criterion. The fact that the original PUD does not include specific standards for this neighborhood is somewhat unusual, and applying the R-3 regulations does make it difficult to upgrade these generally smaller homes. The relatively small lot size does make altering the structure difficult under the R-3 regulations. However, there are not any unique topographical conditions related to the variance. Before making a motion for approval or denial, this specific variance evaluation criterion must be addressed for the official record. If the Planning Commission recommends approval on this variance, Staff recommends the following four conditions: 1. The project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission. 2. The applicant shall use best management practices (BMPs) to control erosion at all times during construction. 3. The applicant shall obtain approval or a waiver from the Rice Creek Watershed District prior to the issuance of any building permits. 4. The structure shall conform to all other regulations in the City Code. Outions The findings in this report are not specific enough to fully support approval or denial of variances one. With a motion to approve or deny variance number one, the italicized criteria must be addressed for the record: 1. The proposed addition is/is not a reasonable use in the R-3 Zone because... 2. The proposed addition will/will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or the City because... 3. The circumstances in this planning case are/are not unique to the property because ... 4. The variance is/is not based on economic considerations alone because. . . City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor September 5, 2007 Page 8 of9 \\Metro-inet.uslardenhi//slPlanninglPlanning Cases\2007\07-020 Bacig Variancel090507 - PC Report - Bacig Variance. doc Criteria I, 2, and 4 are already addressed in the findings. Criteria three must be addressed prior to making a motion. L Recommend Approval with Conditions: Motion to recommend avvroval of Planning Case 07-020 for a variance 1185 Benton Way based on the findings of fact, the submitted plans, and the four conditions in the September 5, 2007, planning case report. 2. Recommend Approval as Submitted: Motion to recommend avvroval of Planning Case 07- 020 for a variance 1185 Benton Way based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans in the September 5, 2007, planning case report. 3. Recommend Denial: Motion to recommend denial of Planning Case 07-020 for a variance at 1185 Benton Way based on the following findings offact... 4. Table: Motion to table Planning Case 07-020 for a variance at 1185 Benton Way: a specific reason and/or information request should be included with a motion to table. Notice Although a variance does not require a public hearing, a public meeting notice was prepared by the City and mailed to properties within three-hundred fifty (350) feet of the subject property. Resident Comment The City has not received any comments regarding this application. Deadline for Al!encv Actions The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on August 14, 2007. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must act on this request by October 12, 2007 (60 days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60 day review period. The City may with the petitioners' consent extend the review period beyond the 120 days. Attachments 3A-1 Application and Supporting Materials 3A-2 Air Photo and Photographs ofthe Site City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor September 5, 2007 \\Metro-inet.uslardenhillsIPlanninglP/anning Cases\2007\07-020 Bacig Variancel090507 - PC Report - Bacig Variance. doc Page 9 of9 Attachment 3A -1 Application and Supporting Materials ~ ~HILLS September 5,2007, Planning Commission Meeting ~ ~HILLS 1245 West Highway 96 Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112 Telephone (651) 634-5120 Fax (651) 634-5137 www.cLarden-hills.mn.us . For Office Use Only Planning Case No. Submittal Date Application Completed Date Accepted by Receipt Number Council Decision Council Decision Date 2007 LAND USE APPLICATION Address of Property Involved: Legal Description: 5"C"e. Pro e ID No.: I ~ 3:;211; C<:e R Tvpe of Reauest' D Apportionment of Assessments ($30) D Comprehensive Plan Amendment ($400) D Conditional Use Permit or Amended CUP ($300) o Final Plat ($200 + $25 per lot) D Final Planned Unit Development ($200) D Master Planned Unit Development ($600 + escrow) D Minor Subdivision (lot spliVconsolidation) ($300) D Preliminary Plat ($400 + $25 per lot + escrow) D Rezoning ($400) D Site Plan Review ($400) D Srte Plan Review (Sign or Fence) ($250) D Vacation of Easement or Right-of-Way ($250 + escrow) ~ Variance (Zoning Code) ($300) D Zoning Code Amendment ($300 + escrow) Revised: 12-12-2006 Page10f3 *Applicants are responsible for reimbursement of consultant fees associated with filing, reviewing, and processing of this application. Such fees are to be paid in escrow up front or upon receipt of statement from the City of Arden Hills. Fees include costs for consultants retained by the City and include consultant planning services, attorney, and engineer. *payment of park dedication fees are required with the approval of most subdivision applications. *The land use application fees do not cover building, sign, or other permit fees that may be required upon approval of a land use application. *Certain applications are subject to review and approval by the Rice Creek Watershed District. Contact RCWD directly at 763-398- 3070 for additional information. Brief Description of Request (please also include a typed, detailed letter explaininq the proiect): VaJicw:e teZu.~ ~ -SteLe.- [de set- bad, ~ Ll:>+ CO('ri'jA fJ .~ +OJ' ~ ('~L(L,-h0-- of. ~ -rwo ?rt"j'-Ti 0.. Jrtrhol'\., 5e"C o+t-o-.~c-' dDC~~ ~J' '" (f~"-\.-rf\[~J. p><FlaJlc,+~ rr ~ 1)(lJ'(C~ ~e~\j~ ' Filina & Information Reauirements The City requests that you make a pre-application meeting with the City Planner to discuss the applicalion process, requirements, and deadlines. Unless waived by the City Planner or Planning Commission, a certified survey of the property is required for all applications. The Planning Commission and/or City Council may still require a certified survey. A checklist for other requited information is also available. Complete/Incomplete Applications An incomplete application will delay the processing of land use requests. The application approval time commences and an application is considered officially filed when the City Planner has received and examined the application and determined that the application is complete. A decision on whether the application is complete or incomplete shall be made within fifteen (15) working days following the submittal of the application. When the application is dH-P I-I:l IN EH "FRP SGlW' 1Whl!:X!!.EH S(JJfl-tj A1 \hl-l agenda of the first possible Planning Commission meeting provided that all required public notices have been sent and published. Payment of Fees The undersigned acknowiedges that she/he understands that before a land use application can be deemed compiete, all required information and fees (including all deposits) must be paid to the City. If additional fees are required to cover costs incurred by the City, the City Planner has the right to require additional payment from one or more of the undersigned, who shall be jointly liable for such fees. Such expenses may include (but are not limited to) direct city payroll and overhead costs, fees paid to consultants and other professionals, and the cost of printing, mailing, and supplies. The City may withhold final action on a land use application, withhold building permits, and/or rescind prior action until all miscellaneous fees have been paid. Applicants are advised that an escrow deposit is required at the time of the submittal of the land use application to offset costs associated with the proposed project. Unused portions of an escrow are returned to the applicant upon successful implementation of an approved plan. Notice of Meetina Attendance In order for the Planning Commission and the City Council to consider any application, the applicant or a designated representative must be present at the scheduled meeting. If not, the matter may be tabled until the next available agenda. Revised: 12-12-2006 Page 2 00 Aaenda Deadline and Meetina Schedule The deadline for submittal of land use applications is required according to the schedule outlined below. There are no exceptions. Planning Commission meetings are typically held on the first Wednesday of each month at 7:00 PM, though please contact City Hall to verify the meeting date and time. City Council meetings are held typically the last Monday of the same month at 7:00 PM. Meetings are held in the Council Chambers at the City of Arden Hills, 1245 West Highway 96, Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112, unless otherwise stated. Applicants are advised that additional meetings and/or workshops are scheduled when necessary upon approval of the Planning Commission. 2007 SCHEDULE (*subject to change) TENTATIVE CITY COUNCIL MEETING DA TE* (d enerally held on the last Monda at 7:00 .m. Acknowledaement and Sianature I acknowledge that I have read all of the information listed in the City of Arden Hills Land Use Application and fully understand t I am responsible for all costs incurred by the City related to the processing of thisappcation. 1/J-,tf/~ Date' ' Applicant Signature (If different than the property owner) Date Please contact the City Planner at (651) 634-5134 or by email atiames.lehnhoff@cLarden-hills.mn.usif you have any questions regarding this application. Additional copies of this application form are available on the City's website: htto://www.ci.arden-hills.mn.us Revised: 12-12-2006 Page 3 of3 QO Q) fCi III ..e -1-' III C'l -I-' 0 .~ -.::t -I-' (I) ~- OJ C":) 0 (ll ~~ Q -1-' C ..e 0 Q c 0 0 J:'- m"r- Or- r- U CJ:> c :::::: ..em <II .~ 3: u ~ u -L L >- C (0 0 0-1-' 0 0 0 C "r- +-' <II 0 :J -I-' 0 L fCi fCi 0 .~ ...J -I-' U u QI 0 u'+-..c (I) :>, c >- <( 0-1-' <11 ~ 0 Q) C k .~ to ..e ,-iJ 0 C (J) -I-' E -I-' <II +' .~ P, .~ fCi L C :::::: 0 v.t:t:: :J.~ m k u o~ c p, <( C LL .~ >- (J) .~ ..e u +' ..c: ..e ~-I-' - C E-< -I-' III - :J 0 :J ~ L +' t1j 0 () 0 0 :J t1j Q tl) 0 U 0 :J Ii] l': LL-I-' ff1v -~ 0 .~ L C - QI -r! ~ (I) 11) t1j C (I) ~ 00 p, - -I-' 0 E 'r! fCiu .c ....c "r- (0 ~ k 0.. C .::J +-t ...f-.i' 0:::' .......... tl l1J :r LOr- III 'S (J) '-fl Ou C Cl L -z u.~ "1JJ '+- H <( \\) rl -I-' 0 u (I) III C QI -I-' QI ..r:. +-' Cy) OJ ~ (J) :J ~ Ou -I-' f1j ...:l :r: QI ~ C L :J ~ ..e -I-' <II J-I-' --I-' :J-I-' O.~ ..: -.::t 0 X LL (Jj -I-' Ql ~ I1J 'f- ~v ~ ~ o~ 0 QI - C .'r! 0 Q ..c t1j f1j .Q ~ -I-' -1-' 0.. -r! ..c: CO\:} L ~ ~. <II f1j C tr, If- ! I%l -u Q III L 0 i (D ~ 11) <II QI i ~ 0 -I-' 3: -I-' L i -I-' 0 l1J -1-' C Q) i 0 <II ..e III ~~ I ...J 1-..0 :r +t 1 ~ , t I i , ! ! . Request for a Variance to Build an Addition 1185 Benton Way Arden Hills, MN 55112 July 28, 2007 To Members of the Arden Hills Planning Commission: We are submiuing the attached request for a variance to the Arden Hills zoning codes to accommodate construction of a two-story addition to our existing single-familydwe11ing located at 1185 Benton Way. The property is located within the Hunter's Park Planned Unit Development and was constructed in 1975. Included with this application is the approval for this addition by the Hunter's Park Homeowners Association's Architectural and Environmental Commiuee. In addition, the approval from the three closest neighbors to this property is also included. We are requesting two variances as described in the following paragraphs. The requests are: riiI. A variance from the required side lot set back of 15 feet riiI. A variance from the R-2 zone lot coverage requirement Background The reason for this request for a variance to the set-back requirement is due to the original construction of the Hunter's Park Planned Unit Development. The planned unit development was originally created using high-density housing areas surrounded by abundant green space that is commonly shared among the single-family units. This approach created distances from lot lines that range anywhere from two feet to perhaps ten feet. In the 1980's, the Gtyof Arden Hills Planning Commission decided to adopt the current Arden Hills R-2 zoning requirements as the rules forthe Hunter's Park Planned Unit Development, thereby placing the majority of the single-family units within the development out of compliance with the new set-back rules. Current minimum lot sizes for the Gty of Arden Hills R-2 zone are 85' by 120'. (See Table One) The lot size for our single-family home is 55' by 150', giving us a much narrow lot within which to operate than would currently be allowable for new development. We are proposing a two-story addition consisting of a lower-level kitchen and dining room expansion, an upper-level master suite and bath, and an expanded basement beneath the kitchen! dining room addition. The current single-family homes within the development are relatively small throughout, including very small kitchens and dining rooms and only three bedrooms in most cases. Rather than move, our hope is to stay within the existing neighborhood, creating a home that beuer meets our family's needs, contributes to the stability of the neighborhood, and allows our children to remain in the Mounds View School District. 1 Table One. R2 Lot Reauirements VERSUS Existiill! Lot Description R2 Minirnnm Rea. Existiill! Lot 1. Lot Area (sf) 11,000 8,250 2. Lot Size (ft, width/depth) 85/120 55/150 3. Height(ft) 35 22.75 4. Lot Covered by Structure 25% 18.90% 5. Min. Landscaoe LotArea 65% 61.2% 6. Min. Building Setbacks (ft) Front Yard 40 67 Rear Yarcl (princiole) 30 45 Rear Yard (Accessory) 10 30 Side Yard Interior - Principle 5/15 6.5/12 (MinI total both yards on lot) Side Yard Interior - Accessory 10 8.3 Variance Request # 1: Required Side Lot Set Back of 15 Feet The planned addition to the southeast corner of the single-family dwelling will change the current south side yard set back from the 6.5.feet to 5.0 feet. No residences adjoin the property on the south side of the house. The land immediately beyond the property line is common area owned by the association; thus the proposed addition will not impact any adjacent residences. Review of Seven Hardship Criteria for Request # 1 1. The property in question cannot l:x! put to a rf.'LISonabk use if used under II1I1fi:itiam alloo.ed by the cffidal wntrds: The property could still be put to a reasonable use without the proposed variance to the required side-lot set back The house, however, is small (approximately 1,800 square feet) and does not meet the needs of our family. Without the proposed addition, the house will remain unsuitable to our current needs as a family, and we will necessarily have to move. 2. The plig,t if the landow1er is due to arrumtarllPS unique to the property not created by the lartdmmer: As stated above, the property was developed as part of a high-density neighborhood. The property was constructed in 1975; the current owner purchased the property in 1996, thus inheriting the current structure and lot size, which is smaller than current lot size minimums allowed by the Gtyof Arden Hills. The plight has been exacerbated by the adoption of the current R-2 zoning requirements by the planned unit development rather than the original zoning requirements that were in place when the planned unit development was constructed. 2 3. 1be cleri4tion ftom the Ordinana; Wth any attathed cunditions Wll still be in keeping 7.lith the spirit and intent if the Ordiname: The intent of the current ordinance is not applicable to the Hunter's Park Planned Unit Development because the original planned unit development was for a high-density, single-dwelling area and not the current low-density zoning ordinances being applied. The addition Wll be in keeping with the regulations and rules of the Hunter's Park Home Owners Association and in keeping with current set- back distances already in use within the development. Finally, the addition will not impact an adjacent structure on the south side of the property, as the land immediately beyond the property line is common land owned by the association and is not another structure. 4. 1be mriana; Wll not CI'1'ate a land use mt permitted in the zone: The variance is not creating or facilitating any new land use. The property will continue to be used as a single- family dwelling. 5. 1be mriana; Wll not alter the esserIt:i4/ thartU1er if the City: The variance will not alter the character of the area; rather, it allows the incorporation of the new addition without impacting an adjacent structure. 6. 1be m.nana; is mt far emnanic reasons alOl7e: The variance is not for economic reasons alone. The property and current single- family unit are located in a wonderful, wooded area; the property is within the Mounds View School District, and we see the addition as a lower-impact land-use approach to addressing our family's need for more space than would be moving to a larger home with a bigger foot ptint or building new construction. 7. 1be prapaed use is perrritted uithin the zone: There is no prohibition applicable to the proposed addition use. Variance Request # 2: R-2 Zone Lot Coverage Requirernent Any addition will be out of compliance with the current minimum lot size requirement, implemented in the 1980's, given that the current structure is already out of compliance with these lot size requirements. Therefore, we are requesting a variance from the lot coverage requirement for total structure (principle and accessory) of 25 percent to 27.04 percent (see Table Two). 3 Table Two. Current Lot Coverage VE.RSUS Proposed Lot Coverage and R-2Zo Re uirements Description Current Current R- 2 Zoning Proposed Proposed Square %of Requirernent Square % of Lot Foota e Lot Foota e Princi Ie Structure 1,045 12.67 1,606 19.46 Accessory Structure 514 6.23 514 6.23 Total Structure (principle & accesso ) 1,559 18.19 2,120 25.69 Paved Drive Wa 1000 12.12 1,000 12.12 Walkways, Deck, Patio 650 7.80 860 10.42 1,650 19.92 10% 1,860 22.54 Review of Seven Hardship Cliteria for Request # 2 1. The property in question cannot Ix put to a rrasonable use if used under CIJI'lditions aIkmed by the ofjidal aJ11tYrl.s: The property could still be put to a reasonable use without the proposed variance to the lot coverage requirement with which the house is currently out of compliance due to changes in lot area requirements post-construction, causing any size addition to be out of compliance. As stated above in response to this criterion, without the proposed addition, the house will remain unsuitable to our current needs as a family, and we will necessarily have to move. 2. The pligpt if the landozmer is due to a=tana:s unique to the property 11111; created by the landm.mer: As stated above, the property was developed as part of a high-density neighborhood. The property was constructed in 1975; the current owner purchased the property in 1996, thus inheriting the current structure and lot size, which is smaller than current lot size minimums allowed by the City of Arden Hills. The plight has been exacerbated by the adoption of the current R- 2 zoning requirements by the planned unit development rather than the original zoning requirements that were in place when the planned unit development was constructed. 3. The deriation /rom the Ordinarux 71im any attadxd <XJnJiitions Wll still Ix in ktxpirrg 71im the spirit and interJt if the Ordimru:e: The intent of the current ordinance is not applicable to the Hunter's Park Planned Unit Development because the original planned unit development was for a high-density, single-dwelling area on smaller parcels of land and not the current low-density zoning ordinances being applied. The addition Wll Ix in 4 keeping with the regulations and rules of the Hunter's Park Home Owners Association and in keeping with lot coverages in use at the time of the planned unit development. . 4. The wriana: Wll not Ol?ate a land use not pemitted in the zone: The variance is not creating or facilitating any new land use. The property will continue to be used as a single-family dwelling. 5. The wriana: Wll not alter the essential character if the City: The variance will not alter the character of the area; rather, it allows the incorporation of the new addition without impacting an adjacent structure. 6. The wriana: is I1Dt for rmaorric rea5011S alOl1e: The variance is not for economic reasons alone. The property and current single- family unit are located in a wonderlul, wooded area; the property is within the Mounds View School District, and we see the addition as a lower-impact land-use approach to addressing our family's need for more space than would be moving to a larger home with a bigger foot print or building new construction. 7. The JrID1XFed use is pemitted'lfithin the zone: There is no prohibition applicable to the proposed addition use. In snrnrnaty, we believe these variance requests are reasonable and appropriate given the original intent of a high-density, low-impact housing development and the fact that the zoning requirements have changed since the construction of the planned unit development. We I?ok forward to your consideration of these requests at the Commission's September 5,h meetmg. Sincerely, fQ~ Edward J. Bac' 5 July 28,2007 MEMO To: From: Re: Hunters Park Homeowners Association Architecture and Environmental ~~ttee Edward and Karen Bacig, Owners, 1185 Benton Way &v Planned addition to 1185 Benton Way We are proposing a two-story addition to our property, located at 1185 Benton Way, constructed in accordance with the attached drawings. Siding and trim colors will remain similar to the current colors used on the house and garage. The addition will increase the structural lot coverage area from its current 21 percent to 27 percent and will reduce the south-side yard set back from 6.5 feet to 5 feet. Specifics of the addition include a lower-level expanded kitchen! dining room area, an upper-level master suite and bathroom, and an expanded basement beneath the kitchen! dining room addition. For details, see the attached architectural drawings. The following three closest neighbors have reviewed and approved these plans: 1) Print name(s): . ---rctY1 e.T C. ~ ( ,,-) Signature(s): ~:ft--~ (/ 77 ~, Address: /!65..oen r/c;n t<J7 Date: ~m (0.( 2) Print name(s): Signature( So ~ Date:_:Y~h Address: 3) Printname(s): OAk F.:.--{/'1-c!( r Signarure(s): h:;? ;7A Address: / / rY (ftf:.~~ 4.-~"1 I ~~{..A.&€:,~ . L~r-~/l ~ Date: 7- Z.,-o7 We would appreciate your review of the attached documents and if you approve, an indication of this approval by your signatures below. Thank you. CC- 7/Pr/o 7 ;j- f C Ct'lfd(~ A & E Committee members' signatures: Date of Approval: , I , I ! ! , i I ; , I I ! 1 i i , 1 i ! 930.7 x 930.8 o o <ri ---r.o- ~.t ::t F '" " o 0 '=> '0 UJ . -" - . " r\~.~ DECK 20 ci o " ~~ ffi8~ '::.::0 ffi~~ E~", 3l(/)<r .-"- W"", c~'" .~ ~ l=! "~Z 2o.n~ ~~~ _ 0 LLUiii N PROPoSED ARBOR / / 25.8;1: \ \ \ \ \ b i- . 7 --- r------....W'ly ~xt~~_iot(Ofthe $out 93{'-\ '~-~ ~1, I . ,v/ I I I ~-"//- ", 0.0 20 / / / / [] x 93~.2 e-.ot.!-ot6 / /c5 /:;:::; / ::J / 0 x 91.6 \ '"'" / 932.8 935.1 S89'53'11"W 150.00 " . x 932.2 :JREMOVEEXlSTING " ENTRVSTOOP ,jJ~,36.1 ,III 'j ~ ni "^ ?;~ ~/' I II 932.4 932.4 'I 5_il 35.6 / '" "'. 934 " --- South line of lot 6 b ~ i / N89'53'11"E 150.00 ,,0/ 934.9 / / / A~ INTERIOR -- -. -- -- '-- EXISTING HOME 1045 ADDIT10N 431 SCREEN PORCH 130 GARAGE 514 I I I I 92919 I I ..----- EXTERIOR OFFICESTOOP__ 77 BACK PATIO 32 BACK DECK 106 ENTRY STOOP 25 BREEZEWAY 107 DRIVE & ENTRY WALK 1222 , I )(928.2 I I I I )(928.2 Ci)-~~:'I:~.-o' ---,.-'-- x 934.7 ci o " _J: .!!l~ "-" ~cr: "'" .", "-" ,,"- .", E", .W ~!z "," ._ J: So - o LL ~34.1 " 1 j I I- -j~ ,e I~ EXISTING GARAGE 514SF w 15 ~ " ~ " . w 935.7 PLANTER 933.7 )(928.6 Outlot E I I ~~,-- I J,,"'E_ 1 I ,..uW_1 1 1 cD 928.1 I ----- "928.2 I SITE INFORMATION TAKEN FROM SURVEY BY: LOUCKS ~SSOCIATES 2007 . -; o o "' "' ~ '" " <D o 1, Z -- -. " .. on .~ .. .. .. " , g ~ 5" ~ . , ~ ~ . , ~ = ~ ~ ~ .. ~t: 'iil u . ;,~~i~n~ ~=r-;;~'ni ei.n;!~L: h= ~ ii 'iJ i ll. E S ~ ~ ~ Ii E n'niJpi ~ .5 ;--1 ii .. 'Ii .. :l e ~ -= t: .. Iii i ..... - .. ~ .. s ~~i~li!~ ~ i]-g ~~= ~ .. ~ D.... D:: CI. .. :is D:;; .l! U ~ .. ~~U~~!J .. " .. '0' ~ Do '" 'u .. ~ ~ .. . .s >0 In Ii ~~ NSS~ lii = c .~ I..il~:e ~oCla~ + ~:z: .2l ; g '! OJ c " W ~ (I) C o o ::E ., c (I) > (I) .. tn ! r , , (I)! .. t :Ii .. ; U~ (I): .. , .- . .c! f:!t Ci ~ . . . . o <( ~ ~ . N ~ ~ , o o ~ ~ ... .. .. 'S: l!! .. ~ .. ... ~ ~ ,; l'l . . o . ~ b - ~3~,~~i~~si~ ~ ~ i .2 l! :;; ~ E .ld~ .] g g,;, :i*ii=;~ "'; id.g,g ~ ~ ii~i:;'i~:: ti:;!~~~~ ~il~e~fi :ee~~!~i Ii ~ '" - 0 .. " " ~li~lie~ i~ti~i~: .! i!! g-..~ j~:~~~l~ ..<I:>c':I=",. ~ U .. 'f ... C> 'u .. ~ :: " ~ c: ~ - ~. c ~.. ~cc; c!.s:c ~:s ; i ",'. ~cgJ~ + ::::i: .~ g " ~ &l 4 ... W ~ . . , Q) ! c 0 I 0 . :E ~ ., " . , . I c . I Q) I > Q) i I . .. . en ; . I . , , . ! I I ~ ~ I ~ , ~ "r"'" ~ 1 <( ~ I l; ~ " ~,l"2.0mLeVeI1 941 -423132" - ~inBoor 936'-923132"-~ ~~1 932'-923/32" CD ExistinoElev Ii 1f4"=1'-Q" a on-west1 , I f BedroomLevel1 1\ 941'.4-23732""'\J f I I @Ere~ationExiSlinQNorth 1f4=1'-Q" ... " en 'S: l! " ~ .. ... g N ~ "" ~ S. rJ ,,~~ J: ~ . i~ll~~=.gr li~gi~~l i;~~;~i: ...~.2q ..ei !gtl'i:i,q ;~;.~:~~~ i~~!i~:i ~ii~i~n .gi:!ll~~!: :::;; :: = ~ ,,= '1 ~~;~_;.1n -' . ~ " " 'e- ... '" 'iJ CO ~ ~ " ~ .s . ~ c: .. ~c~~ c.gS~ Q):; ; .E ~"a:a:&. ~c(:gf + :== '" . .~ ~ OJ C ... W :>lI Ql C o o :iE ., c ~ Ql .. rn ! f 1 Qll ..t ::::I' ..~ C,>>$ Ql~ .. 3 .- ::: .c~ u.. ..i eej c . ~ ~ ~ = N ;; = ~ S ~ ~ " ,._J~~Q!:QOI!!. Level 1 ~423~ -- ~~~ @ ~4~~~,~~~vation - East 1 1 I I I i , j ! ! i ! i G)' .. f ~; .. :; U~ G)~ .. ; .- . .c~ U~ ..' c(j < . ,.... BedroB.mlevel1 U94f-423132" CD ExistinllElevation-South1 1/4"=1'-0" 'D II .. .~ .l! .. 'D 8 ~ ~ ~ .. ~ . .2 ~ :a ~ .01- .:. l' ~ <i i.5 ~" ~ ::a-.l!!i;"'~ "o:o.:;a~~~ It.ll.='l:=:= i~;~r~~i ; ~ ~: i j j ~ II- s t!.. ..:: ll' i $~~~~:1 ~i~~iii!E ~i~~~~~: . s'O S" t-- ::iii::;;! u ~ go ~~ll~!~l! ~ U " 'e- ll. Cl '0 .. ~ ~ " ~ c: ~~ 1: lI$ S " ~. N a = ill c;,g c (1)'- c c !u:g:i ~c({gi + :::= .~ 1ii " ~ &l C 'D W ~ G) C o o :E .., c G) > G) .. en 0r- e:( ~ ~ ;:\ ~ ~ ,;; s ~ ~ ,.. 8edro~mLevel ~-419132'- o Proposed Elevation-West 1 1f4''=1'.O" , I I , I j I I I ... " III .~ ~ g " N ~ ~ II ... ~ = = = ~ . ; .21 ~ l; ~ 1~~.~1lg,;, :~4~i!~~ ... '0:0. 5.g, g.z;r: i~~~;i~; l~2g~~eli ! ~ it 'i:= = ~ Ii ;!i.5~~:~ .; ! e E s 1: i ~:i=;~~::i g=~~=~~~ :~~S~~:~ j~;~3~!i .. .. ~ c " :5 :!. : ~ U " 'e- ll. '" 'u '" ~ ~ " ~ .s >.1/) C ~S ~ = c ~ c~.2~ ~:g!i "'. - - ~ :g~ + :::i: .~ ; U ~ .l'l · ... W CD Proposed Elevation-South 1 1/4'=1'-0" ~ Q) C o o :E .., c Q) > Q) .. fI) ! . i , ! Q)' .. f ~~ .. ~ U; Q)! .. ! .- . .c! U~ a.~ CCI . . ~ . . ~ ~ N 0; S ~ ~ .'.'-..., Attachment 3A - 2 Air Photo and Photographs of the Site ~ ~HILL8 September 5, 2007, Planning Commission Meeting ... ~ ~ = o .... = Cll ~ III 00 ,...., ,...., '0' ~ ,~ - ."jI ~ ~ g ~,~ ii!~-1iII. u~ .jl E:Ii .l!]ild' 1&"z H~IH]HH I!II~'I ~'\~"<..D 10- oj ::8 oj ~ ~jt ~~ '~ ':~:- ''!f~: $: {tal ,t~94 ". 'F \193: I I i I I ~ "n -t,il;t "" 1'190 Jffl!f -uoo \ i J ! ~ :t)~, ~ ,_:1: . !- '~;$1 uliit .-. . ~ . .. " " oS o ;;: " . E .. .C " . " o ] "8 o ~ o ~ .~~~ 8S~ 'E~:a ..... 0..( 4~. " 0." 8S,g e._ ~ e..a d~ is 0""" ~ t:.~ --<S ... S'"d"C 8~~ as o.;!! .~~ ~ g.; 8 e.- e .~] 8 ~ ~:r.s oi:l;r- .00 0-"0 ""N . . ""e- ~Ill~ ::l <1) .~ .!i-;'~ o. .;;H " . 0 1 eo~ .58 -~" 808 . . .- " """",, 1a~1a ~"O~ ~ Iii ~ il ~ ~S d 805 g.~~ s-o<s "tle.S:lr--- "",,0 ][ij~ 02 . e.s~ >>" =@b:E! ~s .~ <II 8 e 1160 $l,u 8 ~ ;g d .0 0 ~ o:!a as .>-' e. " .~:;~ 1=2 . ..O<lt-- ~]g ;::i!;.sC-: & <.{2I~ -' u '" Ci " ~ '" 0; ~ ~ ~ ~ - -"if :E !i 0 ;>- tllliia:.2!:c .e.o ~~J: '" ~~gmi!l~ ~ a. 8~ Sl ~ " .s o ::;: ~ i ~ ~ ~ d ~ ~ ~;9 ~ z S~~J! o o .5 .. '5 o " o <3 o " o .e '~.::-;:g E5~ <S"'- c:: ~.t:: .- 0 "'~ e-< ]s.s" g8-i!l ....="@ 'E e..= 5~ 5 .~ :::iJ :::::<E e E'~2! 0.0 "0_ <<I,8'::! .~ 0 8 Q,_ o~ o. e.- .~~ 8 .., " f-<l:t<S: ~~r-. 5~8 ..", 00 "3~'3 . ~ ::l~" <Ll-= g .Dgp.@3 ,S._ '" ",'E'E 000 "5 ~~ c~ ~~o :;; SJ 8 .- " ""0",, ~~ a >'-o"a3 ~a~ o. -0 0" "15 d 000 ~e8 00" E:3<S: ""~~ -E-g8 00'" g Bo~ ",,~ >>. ~6;E! ~!3u .. 0 eO "" .s.?2~ .~ ~ 5 .;:2 g ~ g."!;;<d e>..l dO :E;;~ f-; B ~ P::g~ "'_0 ;:EgN., <.g~ ..l U '" o " '\'-'\\0:: ..... ~ ~ = Q ..... = Qj ~ I() QO ,..; ,..; '" '" ~ o '" '" .9 .<::; - "0 e '" '" "' '" 0 ~ "- e '" "- .c e .!!1 0 '" "" "' '0 :J "0 0 III .<::; "0 '" '" .<::; "' f- 0 "- -'" e () "- '" '" "0 .<::; Ol - e "0 ~ ~ j 'x ai '" Ol '" -'" en ~ = () ~ III ~ '" Ol "'"0 .<::; '" > '" "S .<::; 0.<::; - - - g"O "' ~ '" '" e ;: > Ol III e '" 010 :;< "' e"O 0 :J :;< e 0 0 0$ ...J .<::; OX ...J '" :>. III ;: g? ." "0 '" = E e - '" "' :J o .<::; '" = "E ~ - "' '" ;: Ol e :;< o o ...J "0 '" "' o "- e "- '" .<::; - '5 e o ~ () .Q '" ai ="' "05 e.<::; III '" ~:5 :J_ o 0 .<::; '" "'"0 :S"t;) -p"" ffi"5 ~ ~ 1;)= ~ 6 Ole e 0 J2E 0"0 0"0 ...J III .!!l '" ~ '" c 0> ~ Ol 0> .e I- oj " '" "- U) C o E c E 0> 0 0> " ~al .0 C en ~ 0> c ;:.2 Ole;; .!;;"u "'" 0 o U) o U) ....I'" 0> .e - '0 c .2 e;; " .Q 0> .e - "0 ~ .s 0> U) ::> o .e 0> = .... o "'" " '" .0 0> = E .g - e:: ~.Q Q):t:: .e "0 t::"O 0'" c"O 0l0> C U) :528- g e ....1"- "0 0> U) o "- e "- 0> .e I- .e:: Q).Q g>1O ~ " '" 0 Ol- O>.l!l .e'" :; .~ c Xo '" ~ 0>"- U) "- ::> '" .,g .~ 0>= :E .!:; C 0> 0>.0 132 0> ::> .o~ .e.e t:: " o ~ c 0 Ol"- C c 32 m o ~ o " ....I U) .,;. " 0> "0 "'" " '" .0 "0 0> U) o "- e "- 0> = .... o c o "" '" " .Q 0> = ~ ~HILLS MEMORANDUM DATE: September 5, 2007 PC Agenda Item 3.B TO: Planning Commission FROM: James Lelmhoff, City Planne~ SUBJECT: Planning Case #07-021 Variance Anthony Rakow 1907 County Road D ATTACHMENTS: 3B-l Application and Supporting Materials 3B-2 Air Photo and Photographs ofthe Site Requested Action The applicant is requesting a variance to construct a 257 square foot addition along the northern and western sides of the dwelling at 1907 County Road D that encroaches 2.65 feet into the front yard setback. Approximately 12.5 square feet of the addition would be within the front yard setback. Backl!round 1. Overview of Request The property owner is proposing to construct a 257 square foot addition to the existing 1.5 story home at 1907 County Road D. The dwelling has a single car attached garage along the western side of the structure. The proposed addition would be constructed adjacent to the garage and it would wrap around to the northwestern corner ofthe building. The addition would provide a second garage stall and a small addition to the dwelling. The current footprint ofthe structure is 1,120 square feet. Along the front ofthe house, the existing attached garage extends 2.65 feet and an entryway extends 4.65 feet into the 40 foot front yard structure setback (Attachment 3B-I and 2). The City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for September 5, 2007 IlMetro-inet.uslardenhi//slPlanningIP/anning Cases\2007\07-021 Rakow Variance\090507 - PC Report - Rakow Variance.doc Page 1 of8 applicant is proposing to keep the addition in line with the existing garage to maintain the architectural lines and continuity ofthe structure. Approximately 12.5 square feet of the proposed 257 square foot addition would be within the front yard setback. The remaining 244.5 square feet of the addition is outside of all setbacks and a variance is not required for that part of the addition. The structure was built in 1941 prior to the incorporation of the City of Arden Hills. There are not any other variances on file for this property. The applicant has submitted a description ofthe proposed addition, a response to the variance evaluation criteria, and a survey of the property (Attachment 3B-l). 2. Site Data Low Density Residential Single Detached Home R-2: Single and Two-Family residential district .279 acres (12,155 square feet) The property is generally flat. 3. Surrounding Area North Low Density Residential R-2: Single and Two Family Single Family Detached Residential Residential South R-3: General Residence Presbyterian Homes Ci o Roseville East Low Density Residential R-2: Single and Two Family Single Family Detached Residential Residential West Low Density Residential R-2: Single and Two Family Single Family Detached Residential Residential City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for September 5, 2007 \\Metro~inet.us\ardenhil/slPlanning\Planning Cases\2007\07-021 Rakow Variance\090507 - PC Report - Rakow Variance.doc Page 2 of8 Plan Evaluation 1. R-3 Regulations, Existing Conditions, and Proposed Redevelopment A. Lot Size & Dimensions The lot is 12,155 square feet, 65 feet wide, and 220 feet long. The lot width is nonconforming in the R-2 Zone. B. Structure Setbacks - Variance required As noted above, 2.65 feet of the existing garage and a front entryway encroach into the forty foot front yard setback. The proposed addition would extend 2.65 feet into the front yard setback next to the garage. The rest of the structure meets all required setbacks. C. Lot Coverage - Meets Requirements. 11,000 1. Minimum Lot Area s 2. Minimum Lot Size (ft, width/de th 3. Hei ht ft. 4. Lot Covered b Structure 5. Min. Landsca e Lot Area 6. Minimum Building Setbacks ft Side Yard Comer 85/120 35 25% 65% 40 30 10 5/15 10 40 The existing and proposed lot coverages do not exceed the lot coverage limitations of the R-2 Zone. Existing Proposed Square feet % Square Feet % House/garage 1,120 9.2% 1.377 11.3% Screen Porch 83 0.7% 83 0.7% Driveway 273 2.2% 273 2.2% Concrete Porch 36 0.3% 36 0.3% Total Coverage 1,512 12.4% 1,769 14.6% Lot Size 12,155 12,155 D. Structure Height - Meets Requirements The existing dwelling with the proposed addition would not exceed the 35 foot height limit. 2. Flood Plain, Wetlands, and Easements The proposed addition is outside of any flood plains, wetlands, or easements. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor September 5, 2007 Page 3 of 8 \\Metro-inet.us\ardenhil/slPlanninglP/anning Cases\2007\Ol-021 Rakow Variancel090507 - PC Report - Rakow Variance.doc 3. Additional Review This application may require Rice Creek Watershed District approval prior to the issuance of any building permits. If the variance is approved, a condition has been added requiring RCWD review prior to the issuance of building permits. Variance Evaluation Criteria The criteria listed below must be used to evaluate each ofthe variance requests. A. Variance Review Criteria - Section 1355.04 Subd. 4.C: Variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code may be granted in instances where the strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration. Variances shall only be granted when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Code. "Undue hardship," as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means: . The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use under conditions permitted by the Zoning Code; . The plight ofthe landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; . The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality; and, . Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Code. B. Additional Review Information: Although State Statutes include guidelines for evaluating variances, the interpretation and meaning of those Statutes have been impacted by various court decisions. A somewhat common, though apparently incorrect, interpretation of the written Statutes is that a property owner must show that they do not have reasonable use of their property without an approved variance. The difficulty with this standard is what counts as "reasonable use" of the property? Since most properties could be construed to have "reasonable use" without a variance, this standard was declared virtually insurmountable by the Court of Appeals. A revised interpretation of the "reasonable use" evaluation criteria has emerged from the Minnesota Court of Appeals. According to the City Attorney, a property owner does not need to show that reasonable use for a property only exists with an approved variance. Instead, the landowner must only demonstrate that the proposed variation is reasonable for a particular property in a given zone. For example, the property owner must only City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor September 5, 2007 \\Metro-inet.uslardenhillsIP/anninglPlanning Cases\2007\07-021 Rakow Variancel090507 - PC Report - Rakow Variance.doc Page 4 of8 demonstrate that an addition that encroaches into a particular setback is reasonable as opposed to showing that the property would only have reasonable use with the addition. While this is a much softer interpretation of reasonable use, the applicant must still address all four variance criteria listed above. Findinl!s of Fact Staff offers the following thirteen findings of fact for review: General Findings 1. The lot size and width exceed the minimum R-2 requirements. The lot width of 65 feet is nonconforming in the R-2 Zone. 2. The existing garage encroaches 2.65 feet and the entryway encroaches 4.65 feet into the forty foot front yard setback. The structure meets all other R -2 setback requirements. 3. The proposed addition would encroach 2.65 feet into the front yard setback. Approximately 12.5 square feet of the proposed 257 square foot addition is within the front yard setback. The area of the addition outside of the setbacks does not require a variance. The proposed addition would be in line with the existing garage. 4. The proposed addition does not encroach on the rear or front setbacks. 5. The existing and proposed lot coverage meets the R-2 Zone requirements. 6. The dwelling with the proposed addition would not exceed the 35 foot height limit. 7. Dwellings are permitted structures within the R-2 Zone. 8. The existing dwelling and the proposed garage are outside of the 100-year flood plain, wetlands, and easements. 9. The lot was created and the structure was built prior to the incorporation of the City of Arden Hills. The structure was built in 1941. Variance Findings: 10. A dwelling and addition are reasonable uses within the R-2 Zone. 11. There does not appear to be any unique topographical conditions that warrant the variance. The substandard lot width for the R-2 Zone does limits access to the rear yard and may present a unique situation under the current regulations. There are not any topographical limitations on the property. 12. Since the proposed addition would not encroach any farther into the front yard setback than the existing structure, the addition is unlikely to have a negative impact on the property or the neighborhood. The continued encroachment would not have a noticeable visual impact. 13. The proposed plans and setback variance for the dwelling do not appear to be based on economic considerations alone. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor September 5.2007 \\Metro-inet.uslardenhil/siPlanninglPlanning Cases\2007\07-021 Rakow Variance\090507 - PC Report - Rakow Variance.doc Page 5 of8 Staff Analvsis The findings of fact for this variance requests do not specifically support a recommendation for denial or approval. A single family home is a permitted use in the R-2 Zone, and the addition is not an unreasonable use in the R-2 Zone. The variance is unlikely to cause a negative impact to the neighborhood or City because there is already a structure on the property, the proposed addition will not be closer to the front lot line than the existing structure, and all other setback and coverage requirements are meet. It does not appear that the variance is based on economic considerations alone. As is often the case, the evaluation criterion that states "The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner," is the difficult evaluation criterion. The substandard lot width does provide some difficulty in accessing the rear yard if the applicant wanted to construct an accessory structure; however, there are not any topographical limitations on the property. While the proposed variance is unlikely to have a negative impact on the neighborhood, the Planning Commission must still consider all of the variance criteria. It should be noted that most of the homes along County Road D were built in the early 1940s prior to the incorporation ofthe City of Arden Hills, The subject lot was likely required to meet different setback regulations when the dwelling was constructed in 1941; however, those exact regulations are not available. Although being subject to different regulations when the building was constructed does automatically warrant the approval of a variance, it may help provide context for why the structure was built with what would now be considered front yard setback encroachments. Based on a quick review of the neighborhood, the slight garage and entryway "bump-outs" appear to be common features on a number of dwellings along County Road D. The main portions ofthe dwellings appear to meet the 40 foot front yard setback requirement but the bump-outs are within the setback according to online air photos. A full survey of the neighborhood would be needed to verify the exact setbacks of other lots. If the Planning Commission recommends approval on this variance, Staff recommends the following four conditions: 1. The project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission. 2. The applicant shall use best management practices (BMPs) to control erosion at all times during construction. 3. The applicant shall obtain approval from the Rice Creek Watershed District prior to the issuance of any building permits. 4. The structure shall conform to all other regulations in the City Code. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor September 5, 2007 \\Metro-inet.uslardenhillslPlanninglP/anning Cases\2007\07-021 Rakow Variance\090507 - PC Report - Rakow Variance.doc Page 60f8 Options The findings in this report are not specific enough to fully support approval or denial of variances one. With a motion to approve or deny variance number one, the italicized criteria must be addressed for the record: 1. The proposed addition is/is not a reasonable use in the R- 3 Zone because ... 2. The proposed addition willlwill not alter the essential character ofthe neighborhood or the City because... 3. The circumstances in this planning case are/are not unique to the property because... 4. The variance is/is not based on economic considerations alone because. . . Criteria 1, 2, and 4 are already addressed in the findings. Criteria three must be addressed prior to making a motion. I. Recommend Approval with Conditions: Motion to recommend avvroval of Planning Case 07-021 for a variance 1907 County Road D based on the findings of fact, the submitted plans, and the four conditions in the September 5, 2007, planning case report. 2. Recommend Approval as Submitted: Motion to recommend avvroval of Planning Case 07- 021 for a variance at 1907 County Road D based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans in the September 5, 2007, planning case report. 3, Recommend Denial: Motion to recommend denial of Planning Case 07-021 for a variance at 1907 County Road D based on the following findings of fact. . . 4. Table: Motion to table Planning Case 07-021 for a variance at 1907 County Road D: a specific reason and/or information request should be included with a motion to table. Notice Although a variance does not require a public hearing, a public meeting notice was prepared by the City and mailed to properties within three-hundred fifty (350) feet of the subject property. Resident Comment The City has not received any comments regarding this application. Deadline for Aeencv Actions The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on August 15,2007. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must act on this request by October 13, 2007 (60 days), unless the City provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60 day review City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor September 5, 2007 IlMetro-inet.uslardenhillslP/anninglP/anning Cases\2007\07-021 Rakow VariancelO90507 - PC Report - Rakow Variance.doc Page 70f8 period. The City may with the petitioners' consent extend the review period beyond the 120 days. Attachments 3B-I 3B-2 Application and Supporting Materials Air Photo and Photographs of the Site City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for September 5, 2007 IlMetro-inet.us\ardenhills\Planning\Planning Cases\2007\07-021 Rakow Variance\090507 - PC Report - Rakow Variance.doc Page 8 of8 Attachment 3B-l Application and Supporting Materials ~ ~HILLS September 5, 2007, Planning Commission Meeting < ~ ~HILLS 1245 West Highway 96 Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112 Telephone (651) 792-7800 Fax (651) 634-5137 www.ci.arden-hills.mn.us Planning Case No. Submittal Date Application Completed Date Accepted by Receipt Number Council Decision Council Decision Dale 2007 LAND USE APPLICATION Tele hone No.: Fax No.: Email Address: Property Information Property Owner: Owner Address: Owner Telephone No. 54.l11e t/..:; Q houe. I Other: Address of Property Involved: Legal Description: crt +,'/(' PropertylDNo.: '55-50- L.-j-Jtf-009'1. Type of Use: '; '5 I 'JI"YI !r bt / Zone: !, - ~ I Property Acreage: , l 7 9 Type of ReQuest* o Apportionment of Assessments ($30) o Comprehensive Plan Amendment ($400) o Conditional Use Permit or Amended CUP ($300) o Final Plat ($200 + $25 per lot) o Final Planned Unit Development ($200) o Master Planned Unit Development ($600 + escrow) o Minor Subdivision (lot split/consolidation) ($300) o Preliminary Plat ($400 + $25 per lot + escrow) o Rezoning ($400) o Site Plan Review ($400) o Site Plan Review (Sign or Fence) ($250) o Vacation of Easemenl or Right-of-Way ($250 + escrow) ~ Variance (Zoning Code) ($300) o Zoning Code Amendment ($300 + escrow) Revised: Ot-30-07 Page lof3 'Applicants are responsible for reimbursement of consultant fees associated with filing, reviewing, and processing of this application. Such fees are to be paid in escrow up front or upon receipt of statement from the City of Arden Hills. Fees include costs for consultants retained by the City and include consultant planning services, attorney, and engineer. 'Payment of park dedication fees are required with the approval of most subdivision applications. 'The land use application fees do not cover building, sign, or other permit fees that may be required upon approval of a land use application. 'Certain applications are subject to review and approval by the Rice Creek Watershed District. Contact RCWD directly at 763-398- 3070 for additional information. Brief Description of Request (please also include a tvped. detailed letter explainino lhe proiect): FilinQ & Information Requirements The City requests that you make a pre-application meeting with the Cily Planner to discuss the application process, requirements, and deadlines. Unless waived by the City Planner or Planning Commission, a certified survey of the property is required for all applications. The Planning Commission andfor City Council may still require a certified survey. A checklist for other required information is also available. Complete/Incomplete Applications An incomplete application will delay the processing of land use requests. The application approval time commences and an application is considered officially filed when the City Planner has received and examined the application and determined that the application is complete. A decision on whether the application is complete or incomplete shall be made within fifteen (15) working days following lhe submittal of the application. When the application is deemed to be "complete" it shall be placed on the agenda of the first possible Planning Commission meeling provided that all required public notices have been sent and published. Payment of Fees The undersigned acknowledges that shefhe understands that before a land use application can be deemed complete, all required information and fees (including all deposits) must be paid to the City. If additionai fees are required to cover costs incurred by the City, the City Planner has the right to require additional payment from one or more of the undersigned, who shall be jointly liable for such fees. Such expenses may include (but are not limited to) direct city payroll and overhead costs, fees paid to consultants and other professionals, and the cosl of prinling, mailing, and supplies. The City may withhold final action on a land use application, withhold building permits, andfor rescind prior action unlil all miscellaneous fees have been paid. Applicants are advised that an escrow deposit is required at the time of the submittal of the land use application to offset costs associated with the proposed project. Unused portions of an escrow are returned to the applicant upon successful implementation of an approved plan. Notice of MeetinQ Attendance In order for the Planning Commission and the City Council to consider any application, the applicant or a designated representative must be present at the scheduled meeling. If not, lhe matter may be tabled until the next available agenda. Revised: 01-30-07 Page 2 of3 Aaenda Deadline and Meetina Schedule The deadline for submittal of land use applications is required according to the schedule outlined below. There are no exceptions. Planning Commission meelings are typically held on the first Wednesday of each month at 7:00 PM, though please contact City Hall to verify the meeting date and time. City Council meelings are held typically the last Monday of the same month at 7:00 PM. Meetings are held in the Council Chambers at the City of Arden Hills, 1245 West Highway 96, Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112, unless otherwise stated. Applicants are advised that addilional meetings and/or workshops are scheduled when necessary upon approval of the Planning Commission. 2007 SCHEDULE ('subject to change) TENTATIVE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING' (Generally held on the first Wednesda at 7:00 .m. :~. TENTATIVE CITY COUNCil MEETING DATE' (Generally held on the last Monda at 7:00 .m. Acknowledaement and Sianature I acknowledge that I have read all of the informalion listed in the City of Arden Hills land Use Application and fully understand that I am responsible for all costs incurred by the City related to the processing of this application. . ) O~ ~ tJ1JI 7 - ;l3~ 01- Property Owner . nature (Required) Date Date Applicant Signature (If differentlhan the property owner) Please contact the Cily Planner at (651) 762-7819 or by email atiames.lehnhoff@ci.arden-hills.mn.usif you have any questions regarding this applicalion. Additional copies of this application form are available on the City's website: htto://www.ci.arden-hills.mn.us Revised: 01-30-07 Page 3 of3 My proposel of building an attached garage has a section of 12.5 square feet that has need for a variance. The need is in keeping with the character of the neighborhood and spirit of the city. One way it keeps the character is by the flow of the other neighboring houses, these houses all aligned with each other with porches around 35 feet and attached garages around 37 feet from the 40 foot front setback. Another way of keeping character and spirit is by keeping the original 1940's type look of the houses on our street by continuing the garage as it is now, this would be an assest to the city. As a note, it would be cheaper for us to build a detached garage in the back yard, $20,000 compared to $32,000, but that would not keep the original character and would also take considerable green space away. We enjoy the green space of our back yard. And we enjoy the green space of the surrunding parks and would not want to move. We think the green space of this property is one of its greatest assests and could not think of distroying that by placing a garage in back. 0::/4;~ ......... 1"'"""""""'1 o " '" SCALE: I INCH EQUALS ZOfEET BASIS FOR BEARING: RAWSEYCOUHTYCOORlllN...1l:S'lS1E:>> (DE:COlBE:lI17, 1991 AOJ.ISlllen) FRONT VIEW Of 1907 COUNTY ROAD 0 \'EST. KEMPER & ASSOCIATES INC. 721 OLD WGIIlfA.Y No.8 mr NEW BRIGHTON. lmlNBSOTA. 55112 851-631-0361 PAX 851-631-8805 SETBACK INFORMAl1ON ZONED: R-2 SINGlE & TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAl DISTRICT FRONT REAR SIDE FLOOR AREA RATIO LOT COVERAGE 40 FEET 30 FEET 5 fEET / 15 FEET 0.3 ,5< SETBACl< INFORMATION PER CITY OF ARDEN HILLS PLANNING DEPT. PHONE: 651-792-7800 """,, 1.O'M<lER/ARCHITECTTO~HDUSE:SE:1BIIQ(RfQUIRDlENlS 'MlHCl1YOf'ARDENHlUSPRlORTONlYCONS'lRIICTlONOREXCAV...TlON. 2. PRlOR TO NlY EXCAV...TlON CONTRACTOR TO 'oalIF'Y UNDERGROUND UTUJTES.....THG<PtlERST...1l:ONE:CAl..L651-454-0002 3.PIL\SE:N01l:THAT'lHEEXlSOOGHOUSE:lI"''I'NOTlIIEETAlLCURReNT SETllAal:R:E:CUl..ATlONSANDlSlIOSTUKELYGRANFAlHEREllBVTHE: ClTYIOSANEXISTINGUSLPIL\SE:NOTEAlLPflCPOSEDAOOIllONS ARESU9JECTTOREWEWBYiHEClTYOFARDENIftLlS. LEGEND (101) DENOlES MEASURED DIMENSION THIS SURVEY (R) DENOTES RECORD DIMENSION AS PER THE LEGAl DESCRIPTION pp 0 POWER POLE EI.l EI ELECTRIC METER -- ----tt- ~ O\'ERHEAD UTlUTY UNES WOOD FENCE WIRE FENCE AIR COND1l10NER UNIT ~1811 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY D71D7Rt (D71D7Rt.DWG) o.e.v..SlI.lS SOUTHWESTCORHER 51/4 <1;=-i~UNTY~Aif D WEs;:i" "" ........mM. -'i_NQoS:'P!J9t1C':"S~._~~:R1GKT:_0r'WAY-;- _,,' . /" SOUTH UHE OF SECTION 33 - - - '~~--P:"~~T--'';> AOJACENTPRQPERTY 19D4G1..EN?AULA'tIENUE PlD 33-30-23-34-0073 '" SUR'YO'MONUMENT .""'" "KEMPER 18407" ""''' 1/2"JRONPlPE 5 56'24'30" W 0.22' o N 89'56'25" E 65.QO'i; """'"' """ "" " \ " " ~ " . ~ PROPOSED ADDlTlON PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA = 257 SQ. FT. I I " 8. , I "~~~~ ~"':t:i!'" :<I'" mt: tl-~Wi~ =E~o~o ~\;~~~ gl'l~~ l::,~g: . '. ~"iij ~ \ ~ .... ~ a 11.4S ~ 1l.1IJ' . ADJACENT RESIDENCE 1911 COlJ)lTYRD 0 W PID 33-30-23-34-0097 ADJACENT RESIDENCE 1903 COUNTYRD 0 W PID33-30-2J-34-0095 14.28' 11.47' 2.65 x 4.7 AREA FALLS 2.65' IN FRONT OF 40' SETBACK AREA=12.5 SQ.fT. MAlL BOX" '" SURIlEYMONUIIDIT MARKED FOUND "KnIPER18407" ~/{;~~oo~'i 0.51' -,," ---~--~589'S6'25'W 2,639.21'--------- o ~ ~ ~ ~ "" "" "" RAKOW RESIDENCE 1907 COUNTY ROAD D WEST CITY OF ARDEN HILLS RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA (SEE LEGAl DESCRIPl10N BElOW) LEGAl DESCRIPl10N WARRANTY DEED DOC. No. 3128752 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THE EAST 65 FEET OF THE WEST 430 FEET OF THE SOUTH 220 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 Of THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 33, TO\\NSHIP 30, RANGE 23. RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA AREA SUMMARY LOT AREA AREA WITHIN CQlJNTY ROAD D WEST TOTAL LOT AREA 12,155 SQUARE FEET OR 0.2790 ACRES 2,145 SQUARE FEET OR 0.0492 ACRES 14,300 SQUARE FEET OR 0.3282 ACRES AREA SUMMARY LOT AREA = 12,155 SQ. FT. OR 0.2790 ACRES AREA WITHIN COUNTY ROAD D WEST ~ 2,145 SQ. FT. OR 0.0492 ACRES TOTAL LOT AREA = 14,300 SO. FT. OR 0.3262 ACRES EXISTING HARDCO~ CALCULATIONS: BUllDlNCFOO'lPRINT_1.120SQ.FT. DRI'ENAY_213SD.FT. CONCRETE SIlEWAU<AND STEPS" 22SSQ. rr. REARCONalETEPORaI_36SQ.FT. SCREENPORI)f= 63 SO. FT. TIlTAl..EXlSTlNGIW'ER\tOllSSURI'ACEAAEA_1,733SO.FT. (14.3% OF LDT AREA) PROPOSED HARDCO~ CAlCULATIONS: BUIUllNGFOOlPRINT_1.377SQ.FT. ORIVEWAY"mSQ.FT. CONalETESlllE:WAl.KANOSTEPS_190SQ. IT. REARCONCftETEPORaI_36SQ.FT. SCREENPOROl-83SQ.FT. (l4.6l1:Of'LOTNlEA) lOTAlEXISTINGIMP€R'oIOUSSlJllFACEAREA_t,779SQ.FT. NOmAlLHARDCOVDl~I..ATlONSEXa.uDE AREAlfII'lHNCOUNlYROAOD'IIEST '".", PREPARED FOR: ANTliQNY RAKOW 1907 COUNTY ROAD 0 ~ ARDEN HILlS, MINNESOTA 5,5112 PHONE: 651-626-087g":\ '. ",-::j~ KDlI'al&ASSoo"'TES.INC.@ ~ Attachment 3B-2 Air Photo and Photographs of the Site ~ ~HlLLS September 5, 2007, Planning Commission Meeting :;;: ~ . ~!J u~ ~~~1it ~iq ~!ii ~ltH~ Ii h~~.shh""" 1iiI:~ ~'\~':UID 41!~j:!/j!L,,~,,",;, j ~: \ ~~ g :;E co; Q,l ;.. -< t814 ... .... , , , , , , , i I "" 1900, "'" , i I ! , I I I [ ! 1$:1~ illZa, "'" "" l~l! ~-A . ~ ~ I ~ I fi o ')\~'\ g ~ g ~ ~ ,," "" f. " ~' It;f im ;i~ ,i$l :W;I' :iijO& :1!lU jrn$ ,t!l2) li!f1' ';933; ~~$ ~ I I ,'" "" ~ 1;8li,t ~ ~ t~ ~"', ,"" !~ 48%2 1'$ .... t~ ,re90: :~~ ~\- :s6BI j:.:,i5,\ ~I ,1:\!i14 t4fli {9jJ illf6:c jliJ1 ~>>J l~- ,tit-, 1m: '... "" .." I L I i ~~ -~ 1&;l:Z . " " L " .-- ,., -~- "'- ~ --- ,- .. j . F r _;ZL:: -~_: ~' ~ I I -1~ ....... ~~ .'''. :g ~ :;;: ~ .g ....... .. 'C ~ " o -g "8 " " o <8 ..8>.\0 ""20 eO~ ~g1: -.~!.: .as' .0." 8~-@5 eg-;; 'g e..o :> d~ ~ ..8 e:g ~.9 ~ S'og-g 8~~ od Q).:!: .~~ ~ ~; E e.- e ]1 ~ :~::: ~ ~~ ~ 8]8 .OM ~~~ ~"'-, ~.s i:! ~ "'.@ $l.E "" ]~~ "0000 C e e ~~ g~~ .~ ~ s: ]]] ii ClIO co :!: >''''Cdi ~ Ie ~ . ~ : ~~~ 000 =-8 rt~... S-o<s "O~l:-- -8118 ooM 0.0 egM &'''::-3 gJ.a>:-> -"~~ "'8e t ~C) 13'''01) '""t..l(,l ~ ~ 5 .~ 0 ~ P;; <<l e:>....l O. '~:;r=: F'B 6:igS ~;;g . <~~ d ~ ~ ? Q ~ o <3 ~ E O! Ui "' ~ en J. ~- I ! I . E 1 I , ~~ ':<;; 1~ ......... "'" . ~- .~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~! ~~a2!~ -" ~~ ~ ~) &~~i ,", ~'\'\\O ~ :;: <II '* '" i g,~]! ?S ;:; 15 tii ~ g 8 ~ ~ j~gi.! :>0 Q. N J: Vl . o "5 0; "0 . o " "0 0 a '8 6 .g ".g>.\O f~g o N ~~:a .....~ 0 <C -1l~.. 8 Q.,g e8,g d~] c<.E:l c sa e.g ~ l....;;;; ==<2 e 5'"'=''''O 8~~ 0.0 ",,D"D "0..8 ~ E"~ .~-g 8 ,cO" t-$::f<E g~r-- o..c8 _-N 00 ]~:E! ~-5 if -""-11 8.S on "'O'E'E .g a8 ~ee .8 ~ os~ ~ 5l 2 "- " "0]"0 ale; ~ [;'-g"i> ~::~ -. 0" ::;~ a 0_ 0 g.!,::!U e-8-El "0<1{ Ol}-ob ]a~ ". . e~o btl<"") io~:E! Ol) c .~ -;5::l .... 0 J2 -5.~~ 'S 0 U 0_0 .~ g ~ g."5j ~ e'>-> ",.E] ~]r--~ lii.g8 ",_0 ~.fIN~ <.a;:;:; >-> u en c; ~ "r::l = ~ .c = = o U r- = 0'1 .... ~ e Oi 0; "' ~ o '" lfl 13 III e o " <ll rn .<= - <ll Cl e! III Cl <ll .<= - - o .... :J o 0.-" EO :J III .0,03 . <ll <ll III .<=" -~ "E~ ~"E 00 -.:: Cl<ll .f: J:: ""- 00 0- ....J .f: <ll ,5 '5 " o TJ o .Q <ll ,5 " " III <ll Cl III ~ III Cl <ll ,5 - o ~ III <ll ~ <ll .<= - " ~ III . ;;: " .sg ..c:u -" 5 III "''' Cl<ll .f: ~ ""0. g 2 ...J 0. <ll ,5 .9 C <ll 0 III '0 III .!!l .<= 0 ai :c III ;;: :J 0 .,.. .<= Cl <ll e! ,5 III '5 Cl <ll - ,5 " .g '5 <ll <ll .<= " - -w "E <ll C ~ ,5 g .9 Olu "" .<= o III 1:: (Q" 0 Cl<ll " " III Cl -- 0 " ""0. 32 o 0 o ~ 0 ...J 0. 0 ...J ~ ~HILLS MEMORANDUM DATE: September 5, 2007 PC Agenda Item 3. C TO: Planning Commission FROM: James Lelmhoff, CitYPlannerff SUBJECT: PC #: 07-022 Bethel University, Bruce Kunkel Conditional Use Permit Amendment and Site Plan Review 3900 Bethel Drive ATTACHMENTS: 3C-l 3C-2 3C-3 Project description and site plans City Engineer and Building Official reviews Area map, air photo and pictures of the site Requested Action The applicant has requested a Conditional Use Permit Amendment and Site Plan Review to construct 112 net new parking spaces in three areas on the Bethel University Campus. Backl!round 1. Overview of Request: Bethel University is proposing to add 112 net new parking spaces in three locations on their campus (Attachment 3C-3): 1. Twenty-seven spaces along Seminary Drive, which is an internal private road; 2. Forty-nine spaces in the Upper East Lot North; and 3. Thirty-six spaces in the Upper East Lot South; The public hearing notice that was sent to nearby residents stated that 114 parking spaces were proposed to be added in this project. The first version of this parking lot expansion proposal included an unintended encroachment into the 20 foot required setback for parking lots from property lines that are adjacent to a right-of-way. Bethel University has revised the City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for September 5, 2007 \\Metro.inet.us\ardenhills\PlanninglPlanning Cases\2007\07-022 Bethel Parking Expansion CUP Amendment and Site Plan Review\090507 - PC Report - Bethel CUP Amendment and Site Plan Review.doc Page 1 of8 plans to eliminate any setback encroachments, which reduced the parking request by two stalls. The original description of the project, an updated project request letter, and the revised site plans are included with this report (Attachment 3C-I). According to the applicant, the additional parking is not meant to facilitate a student or staff expansion. The parking spaces will help ease an existing parking space deficit on the campus. Since the parking stall expansion in the proposed locations were not included on the 1996 Master Plan, a conditional use permit amendment is required to amend the Master Plan. cases have been reviewed since the 1996 Master Plan was adopted: 07-004 Site Plan Review and University Commons 3/26/2007 (A) Variance 06-007 Site Plan Review Welcome Center 3/13/2006 (A) 04-010 Conditional Use Temporary 4/24/2004 (A) Permit Amendment Classrooms 04-002 Conditional Use New Dormitory 3/29/2004 (A) Permit Amendment 02-010 Site Plan Review Amendment to Ona 6/18/2002 (A) Orth Site Plan 00-001 Conditional Use Ona Orth Athletic 2/14/2000 (A) Permit Complex 99-010 Site Plan Review East Parking Entrance 8/9/1999 (A) Conditional Use Traffic Generation 10/26/1998 98-007 Permit Amendment I Site Plan Review Numbers (A) 97-014 Site Plan Review Building Addition 7/14/1997 (A) 96-026 Conditional Use Master Plan 1/211997 (A) Permit Amendment Amendment 2. Surrounding Area: North Right-ol-Way I Low Density Right-ol-Way I R-1 Single Family Right-ol-Way I Single Family Residential Residential Residential South Railroad I Low Density Railroad I R-1 Single Family Railroad I Single Family Residential Residential Residential East Right-ol-Way I Industrial Right-ol-Way II-Flex Right-ol-Way I Office I Industrial West Low Density Residential R-1: Single Family Residential Single Family Residential City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor September 5, 2007 IIMetro-inet.uslardenhillslPlanningIPlanning Cases\2007107-022 Bethel Parking Expansion CUP Amendment and Site Plan Review\090507 - PC Report - Bethel CUP Amendment and Site Plan Review.doc Page 2 of8 3. Site Data: Public and Institutional Institutional B-1: Limited Business District -246 acres including Ona Orth and Lake Valentine, -187 acres not including Lake Valentine The elevation generally decreases toward the southwest. Plan Evaluation 1. Site Plan Review A. Lot Coverage - Meets Requirements Condition number eleven from Planning Case 07-004 for the University Commons building required Bethel University to submit updated lot coverage information with their next planning case. That information has been submitted to the City with this application: Current Bethel Universitv Coverage Calculations Bituminous 1,065,976 13.10% Buildings 387,947 4.77% Concrete 124,766 1.53% Walls 7,207 0.09% Sleps 3,377 0.04% Skyway 880 0.01% Paver Bricks'" 24,112 0.30% Total Non-landscaDe Area 1,614,265 19.84% Creek 11,351 Pond 161,262 Land Landscape Area 6,349,774 Total Landscaoe Area 6,522,387 80.16% Total Land Area I 8,136,652 75.76% Valentine Lake I 2,603,114 24.24% Total Overall Area"'''' I 10,739,766 '" Includes all pervious paver areas "''''As reported on the 8-9-07 survey prepared by Sunde Land Survevino The proposed parking stall expansion would remove 44,624 square feet of landscaped area. The total landscape area would decrease to 79.61 percent of the property from the current 80.16 percent landscape area. Total lot coverage would subsequently increase to City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor September 5, 2007 \\Metro-inet.uslardenhi/lslPlanninglPlanning Cases\2007\07-022 Bethel Parking Expansion CUP Amendment and Site Plan Review\090507 _ PC Report - Bethel CUP Amendment and Site Plan Review.doc Page 3 of8 20.39 percent from 19.84 percent. The Master Plan for the campus limits total lot coverage to 25 percent. Lot coverage would not exceed the coverage limit with this proposed expansion. The applicant is proposing to use pervious pavers for 40,113 square feet of the 44,624 square foot parking stall expansion, which is approximately 90 percent of the project area. Although pervious pavers still count as lot coverage, they do provide some stormwater infiltration benefit and are more environmentally friendly than traditional parking lots. B. Parking Lot Setbacks - Meets Requirements The proposed parking additions to the upper east parking lot may be somewhat visible to drivers on Highway 51; however, it is unlikely that it would create any significant visual impact to the highway. The Zoning Code (1325.06 Subd. l.D.4) and the Campus Master Plan requires a parking setback of twenty feet from the external property lines that are adjacent to the right-of-way. The Seminary Drive parking is well outside of the twenty foot setback. The upper east lot north is about 35 feet from the property line at its closest point. The upper east lot south is 20 feet from the property line at its closest point. The proposed parking adjacent to Seminary Drive is unlikely to be visible outside of the campus and is not subject to any additional setbacks. c. Traffic Impacts - No Expected Impact No significant changes to traffic flow or volume are expected since this application does not include an expansion in staff or students. D. Landscaping - No Specific Requirements The City does not have specific landscaping requirements for parking lot expansions; however, the City can require reasonable screening and landscaping through the conditional use permit amendment process. The parking stall expansion is anticipated to require the removal of approximately 21 trees (285 caliper inches). The trees to be removed are included on the submitted plans and do include a number of mature trees. In response to the tree removal, the applicant is proposing to plant 40 new trees (110 caliper inches). Although there will be a net loss in caliper inches since the removed trees are more mature, there will be a greater number of caliper inches in the long-term as the new trees mature. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor September 5,2007 \\Metro-inet.us\ardenhillslPlanninglPlanning Cases\2007\07.022 Bethel Parking Expansion CUP Amendment and Site Plan Review\090507 _ PC Report - Bethel CUP Amendment and Site Plan Review.doc Page40f8 2. Additional Review The City Engineer has submitted her comments, which are primarily technical nature and are not expected to impact the overall design, location, or layout of the project (Attachment 3C- 2). The Building Official's comments also do not impact the overall design of the project (Attachment 3C-2). Since there is an existing gas line under the proposed parking along Seminary Drive and a power line adjacent to the upper east lot expansion area, Bethel University will need to work with the utility company to ensure that there is no interference with those utilities. 3. Conditional Use Permit Amendment/Site Plan Review Criteria - Section 1355.04 Subd 3 Section 1355.04 Subd 3 ofthe Arden Hills Zoning Code lists the criteria for evaluating a Conditional Use Permits and Site Plan Reviews. When evaluating conditional use permits and site plan reviews, the Planning Commission and City Council should consider the effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, convenience and general welfare of the owners and occupants ofthe surrounding land, in particular, and the community as a whole, in general, including but not limited to the following factors: I. Existing and anticipated traffic and parking conditions; 2. Noise, glare, odors, vibration, smoke, dust, air pollution, heat, liquid or solid waste, and other nuisance characteristics; 3. Drainage; 4. Population density; 5. Visual and land use compatibility with uses and structures on surrounding land; adjoining land values; 6. Park dedications where applicable; and the 7. Orderly development of the neighborhood and the City within the general purpose and intent ofthis ordinance and the Comprehensive Development Plan for the City. Findinl!s of Fact Staff offers the following twenty-two findings of fact for the University Commons for the Planning Commission's consideration: General Findings: 1. The applicant is proposing to expand parking in three locations: City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor September 5, 2007 IlMetro-inet.uslardenhillslPlanning\Planning Cases\2007107-022 Bethel Parking Expansion CUP Amendment and Site Plan Review\090507 - PC Report - Bethel CUP Amendment and Site Plan Review.doc Page 5 of8 a. 27 new stalls along Seminary Drive b. 49 new stalls to the Upper East Lot (north) c. 36 new stalls to the Upper East Lot (south) 2. Parking is a permitted use in the B-1 Zone. 3. The proposed parking expansion was not included on the Master Plan approved in Planning Case 96-026. A conditional use permit amendment and site plan review are required to amend the Master Plan to include the proposed parking lot expansion. 4. The proposed parking expansions meets all setback requirements. 5. The proposed parking expansion does not exceed the lot coverage limits for the campus. On the Conditional Use Permit Amendment/Site Plan Review: 6. The proposed parking expansion is not expected to have any significant impact on traffic or parking conditions since no change in the campus population is expected from this building. 7. The proposed parking expansion will not produce any permanent noise, glare, odors, vibration, smoke, dust, air pollution, heat, liquid, or solid waste. Temporary noise and dust may be created during construction. 8. The parking expansion includes the use of pervious pavers, which may help reduce the stormwater impact of the proposed project. 9. The proposed parking expansion is not expected to have any impacts on campus population or density. 10. The park dedication fee is not applicable to this application. II. The proposed building does not conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan or the intent of the Zoning Code. On the Landscaping Plan: 12. The parking expansion requires the removal of21 trees for a total of285 caliper inches. 13. The Zoning Code does not have specific landscaping requirements for parking lot expansions. 14. The applicant is proposing to plant 40 new trees for a total of 110 caliper inches. 15. The parking expansion is unlikely to have a significant visual impact from neighboring properties since the nearest property is approximately 300 feet to the east across Highway 51. Notice Notice was published in the Arden Hills/Shoreview Bulletin and notice was prepared by the City and mailed to residents within three-hundred fifty (500) feet of the subject property. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor September 5, 2007 IlMetro-inet.uslardenhil/s\PlanningIPlanning Cases\2007107-022 Bethel Parking Expansion CUP Amendment and Site Plan Review\090507 - PC Report - Bethel CUP Amendment and Site Plan Review.doc Page 60f8 Resident Comments Staff has not received any letters, e-mails, or telephone calls from property owners or occupants in regards to this planning case. Staff Recommendation Based on the submitted plans and findings off act, Staffrecommends approval of Planning Case #07-022 for a Conditional Use Permit Amendment and Site Plan Review to construct 112 parking stalls at Bethel University. The recommendation for approval is subject to the following ten conditions: I. The applicant shall continue to abide by the conditions of all previous permits and reviews. 2. The project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission. 3. Building Permit Plans shall be submitted to the Building Official a minimum of two (2) weeks before the planned start of construction. 4. The applicant shall submit an escrow, bond, or other financial surety acceptable to the City Attorney for 125 percent of the cost of materials and installation of the landscaping plan prior to the City issuing the building permit. The City shall retain the financial surety for at least one year after full implementation of the landscaping plan. The financial surety shall only be released upon successful inspection of the landscaping by the City Planner, which shall only occur during the growing season. 5. A temporary fence shall be placed around the construction area to protect existing trees. The fence shall be subject to City Planner inspection and shall be in place prior to the start of any site preparation or the issuance of building permits. The fence shall be maintained until the completion ofthe project and shall not be removed without City Planner approval. 6, Revised plans that are in accordance with the Civil Engineer's memo dated August 28, 2007, shall be submitted to the City prior to the issuance of any permits and the start of any site preparation or tree removal. 7. The applicant shall obtain all necessary permits from the Rice Creek Watershed District, MPCA, and other governmental entities and provide the City with copies of such permits prior to the City issuing any building permits. 8. The applicant shall supply the required number of ADA accessible parking spaces prior to the issuance of the occupancy permit for the University Commons. The location ofthe accessible stalls shall be subject to Building Official approval. 9. Seminary Drive shall have at least a twenty (20) foot wide clearance in the driving portion of the roadway. 10. The applicant shall provide written approval from the utilities companies prior to the issuance of any building permits or any site preparation to ensure that there is no City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor September 5, 2007 IlMetro-inet.uslardenhillslPlanninglPlanning Cases\2007\07-022 Bethel Parking Expansion CUP Amendment and Site Plan Review\090507 _ PC Report - Bethel CUP Amendment and Site Plan Review.doc Page 7 of 8 impact on the gas or power lines. 1. Recommend Approval with Conditions: Motion to recommend avvroval of Planning Case 07-022 for a Conditional Use Permit Amendment and Site Plan Review at 3900 Bethel Drive based on the fmdings of fact and the submitted plans as amended by the ten conditions in the September 5,2007, planning case report. Options & Proposed Motion Lanl!ual!e 2. Recommend Approval as Submitted: Motion to recommend avvroval of Planning Case 07- 022 for a Conditional Use Permit Amendment and Site Plan Review at 3900 Bethel Drive based on the findings offact and the submitted plans in the September 5, 2007, planning case report. 3. Recommend Denial: Motion to recommend denial of Planning Case 07-022 for a Conditional Use Permit Amendment and Site Plan Review at 3900 Bethel Drive based on the following findings: findings to deny should specifically reference the reasons for denial and why those reasons cannot be mitigated. 4. Table: Motion to table Planning Case 07-022 for a Conditional Use Permit Amendment and Site Plan Review at 3900 Bethel Drive: a specific reason and information request should be included with a motion to table. Deadline for Al!encv Actions The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on August 16,2007. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes, the City must act on this request by October 14,2007 (60 days), unless the city provides the petitioner with written reasons for and additional 60 day review period. The City may, with the consent ofthe applicant, extend the review period beyond the initial 120 days. Attachments 3C-l Project description and site plans 3C-2 City Engineer and Building Official reviews 3C-3 Area map, air photo and pictures of the site City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for September 5, 2007 IlMetro-inet.uslardenhillslP/anningIP/anning Cases\2Q07\07-022 Bethel Parking Expansion CUP Amendment and Site Plan Review\090507 _ PC Report - Bethel CUP Amendment and Site Plan Review.doc Page 8 of 8 Attachment 3 C-l Project Description and Site Plans ~ ~HILLS September 5, 2007, Planning Commission Meeting August 6, 2007 ANDERSON - JOHNSON ASSOCIATES, ... INC AIl.....5-.... ~rA........ LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE . SITE PLANNING . CIVIL ENGINEERING James Lelmhoff, AICP, City Planner City of Arden Hills 1245 West Highway 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112 RE: Parking Lot Improvements Bethel University Arden Hills, Minnesota We are pleased to provide the enclosed Plans and support documents in support of proposed Parking Lot Improvements at Bethel University. We are requesting a Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review for the benefit of the proposed project. With this submitted information, we understand that we will be afforded review at the September 5th Planning Commission meeting and fmal review at the City Council meeting of September 24th. Proiect The proposed Parking Lot Improvements project includes the construction of three (3) parking areas. Two of the parking lot expansion areas (31 and 56 stalls) are located off the east edge of the existing Upper East Parking Lot; the third expansion area (27 stalls) is a widening of the road for angled parking near the Seminary. The parking expansion is being proposed to satisfY current needs of the existing student and staff counts. Bethel University is not proposing to increase student enrollment. As part of this project, we are proposing to construct the majority of the new parking expansion areas of porous pavers in order to decrease surface runoff and to pre-treat storm water before it enters the storm sewer system (and Lake Valentine). Approximately 40,800 square feet of porous pavers will placed for the new parking lots. The only bituminous pavement proposed for use on this project is at the access drive to the Upper East Parking Lot (South) where the slope of drive is not conducive to paver construction (and containment of storm water). Accessible stalls will be positioned in existing parking lots (see Plan) to account for the increased parking counts. Based on 87 new stalls being added with the overflow parking, we will add (restripe) four (4) new accessible stalls at the west side of the existing Upper East Parking Lot. VALLEY SQUARE OFFICE CENTER . SUITE 200 . 7575 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD . MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55427 PHONE (763) 544-7129 . FAX (763) 544-0531 You will note that we are proposing to remove approximately 26 trees (345 caliper inches). Surrounding and within the parking expansion areas, we are proposing to plant 40 new trees (approximately 110 caliper inches). We have engaged Sunde Land Surveying to confirm hard surface area quantities within the Bethel University campus. As soon as we have those calculations, which will delineate bituminous/ concrete areas from porous paver areas, we will forward them to you. Related CoordinationIReview/Permittin" Rice Creek Watershed District. We have submitted documents to Rice Creek Watershed District and they have reviewed and commented on our permit application (#07-072). We will providing additional information to the RCWD to satisfY their questions and will be on the August 22, 2007 Board Meeting agenda. Anticioated Construction Schedule Bethel University is hoping to have the two parking lots in the Upper East Parking Lot area completed this Fall (2007). The Seminary Drive parking expansion area may not be constructed until next year (2008). If this is the case, we would like to have the opportunity of extending permit approvals if the project falls outside the 12 month window. We trust we have responded to each of the City's requirements and concerns related to the application for a Conditional Use Permit and for the Site Plan Review. If you have any questions or concerns regarding the project, please do not hesitate to contact us at your earliest convenience. Respectfully submitted, ANDERSON-JOHNSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Jay R. Pomeroy, LLA Project Landscape Architect ~Q enclosure cc: Bruce Kunkel - Bethel College August 23, 2007 ANDERSON - JOHNSON ASSOCIATES, ..... ING. ............... ~ZiA...,."... LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE . SITE PLANNING . CIVIL ENGINEERING James Lehnhoff, AICP, City Planner City of Arden Hills 1245 West Highway 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112 RE: Parking Lot Improvements Bethel University Arden Hills, Minnesota We are pleased to provide the enclosed updated Plans for the proposed Parking Lot Improvements at Bethel University. With this update, we understand that we will be afforded review at the September 5th Planning Commission meeting and final review at the City Council meeting of September 24th You will note that we have modified the design of the Upper East Lot (South) so satisfy the 20-foot setback requirement (from the Hamline Avenue right-of-way). With the new configuration, the parking lot will provide 49 stalls (53 new stalls in the new lot but removal of 4 for the drive connection). The proposed Upper East Lot (North) will provide 36 new parking stalls (29 new stalls and an additional 7 stalls with added striping in the existing lot). The proposed Seminary Drive Parking will add 27 stalls. As mentioned previously, accessible stalls will be positioned in existing parking lot(s) to account for the increased parking counts. Based on 87 new stalls being added with the overflow parking, we will add (restripe) four (4) new accessible stalls at the west side of the existing Upper East Parking Lot. We trust we have responded to each of the City's requirements and concerns related to the application for a Conditional Use Permit and for the Site Plan Review. If you have any questions or concerns regarding the project, please do not hesitate to contact us at your earliest convenience. Respectfully submitted, ANDERSON-JOHNSON ASSOCIATES, INC. ~Q. Jay R. Pomeroy, LLA Project Landscape Architect endosme cc: Bllice Kunkel - Bethel College V ALLEY SQUARE OfFICE CENTER . SUITE 200 . 7575 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD . MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55427 PHONE (763) 544-7129 . FAX (763) 544-0531 PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS BETHEL UNIVERSITY ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA VICINITY MAP BETHEL UNIVERSITY /F J;a~S'(;frJ'!,' !:II, ,~ Iw c.,""tRoad r '""4~~-~'~~~-~'~-' . ..,!l.l....~u_ 9Q9I!' I r Bethel University 3900 Bethel Drive St. Paul, MN 55112 GENERAL NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE TO SITE AND PROTECT eXISTING VEGETATION AND SITE FEATURES (CURBS, WALKS, PAVEMENTS, OVERHEAD AND UNDERGROUND UTILrTlES, SIGNAGE, FENCING, ROADWAYS, DRAINAGE PIPING, ETC.) WHICH ARE TO REMAIN. 2. REPAIR OR REPLACE EXISTING PROPERTY AND SITe FEATURES, INCLUDING GRASS AND VEGETATION, WHICH IS TO REMAIN THAT IS DAMAGED BYTHE WORK, TO OWNER'S SATISFACTION AND AT NO ADOmONAL caSTlO THE OWNER. 3. VISIT THE. SITE PRIOR TO BIDDING; BE FAMILIAR WITH ACTUAL CONDITIONS IN.-THE RELO. EXTRACOMPENSATlON WILL NOT BE ALLOWED FOR CONomONS WHICH COULD HAVE BEEN DETERMINED ORANl1CIPATED BY EXAMINATION OF THE SITE, THE CONTRACT DRAWINGS AND THE INFORMATION AVAlLABl..E PERTAINING TO lITIUTlES AND OTHER SITE CHARAC1ERISTICS. 4. INSTALl.. BARRICADES OR FENCING AS NECESSARY TO SECURE SITE AND TO PROTECT PUBUC. 5.AU. PHYSICAl. ELEMENTS IMPACTING CONSTRUCTION AND REQUIRING REMOVAl.., MAY NOT BE IDENTIFIED ON THE REMOVAl..S PI.ANS. THE CONTRACTOR MUST VISIT lHE SITE, PRIOR TO BIDDING, TO CONFIRM OR TO SUPPl..EMENT THE EXTENT OF REMOVAL WORK NECESSARY. 6. CHECKAl..L DIMENSIONS AND VERIFY BEFORE STAKING. 7. INSTALL EROSION CONTROl.. DEVices BEFORE BEGINNING EXCAVATING OR GRADING. MAINTAIN AND REPAIR UNTIL CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE. 8. LOCATE All. ON-SITE UTIUTIES (PUBLIC AND PRIVATE) BEFORE BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. NO ADDmONAL COMPENSATION WILL BE GIVEI'I FOR CONTRACTOR'S LACK OF VERIFICATION OR OMISSION BY LOCATION SERVICE. 9. PROTECT EXISTING PLANTS AND FACIUT1ES WHICH ARETO REMAIN. 10. SALVAGE TOPSOIL FOR REUSE. SUPPLEMENT AS NECESSARY. 11. MAINTAIN OUST CONTROL DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. 12. LIMIT ACTIVITIES TO THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 13. MAINTAIN ADJACENT STREETS CONTINUOUSLY ClEAN FROM CONSTRUCTION CAUSED DIRT AND DEBRIS DURING Al..l.. SITE OPERATIONS. 14. ALL CONSTRUCTION MUST COMPl.. Y WITH APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES. 15. BENCH MARK_ REFER TO APPUCABLE SHEETS. DRAWING INDEX TITl.ESHEET REMOVALS PLAN LAYOllT AND FINISHING PlAN GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN SITEOETAlL.S CAMPUS MAP U....EllEAST I.OTP,o.RIQ/fU EllPAllSION - Ifi':':!.. 'I "~'" o i'>,""">... i> ~ ~ ~ , z . ~ ~::i r OOua:: ""' ::~ ~i~l~ :P~~o ~E-gh iii~~l ~ f~~~: --"-",,, " <> ~ " i':<; f5~ ;;SW ~u~ ",,,, ~[:J ",,, ~ " Ul I- Z W ~ ~ >~g eoow 1>:'" z o..W::;; :::E2::i: -~~ I-~~ e!l:l:E ..J>-z Ww Gale Z '" - "" :.: I>: <C 11. , - I- W W :t: Ul W ..J I- ;:: J ffi~ ~:I '- <" ~" ~ i ~ ~,~ <ti::::~ ~~~ ""C iii~~ ~~ u, !~ ~~ ~' " ~~ ~~ ~~~ "1"'''' ~M ",S:;;' !Ef5~ ::sE~ ~ . ffi > ~ " w ~ . ~ <; ~ ~.f' "">-~ """,,~~ ?f~\ ',' ~.",,"~'i0.~~-- \':\~~l \ \:~ ??~ \ ',.~ -\"'-' ~. ...--t .".../ 1\ , I ! 11 II "f. ~i "-'.: .,--, '-G;~! >J. '>J.' ",.,::. /.. ""'1' -.,""'! "',;" "j,. i, ""'iL'" ".. r.. i' ."'~ "'f ......7::;,.." "-i. ", .'...../ ~" (';"'r~~ ! i" G- fl;." c (1--::::: '__Y" r-, i-- \:~-.t., .,'.... !~l[~~; "',.J '--"j~" / ~... -"C;."~-:;;:;:>, _'" \f ('". G_~:- C"., ,-;<\ -,.~\ ~, Blni.MIIlO~ PAIIEM""'1 \ ~~f-...~~{" . ~ ,2: //~ // "f--_)! ,(;,-,( ! 'i'~'--r"---' /<~ :~'r'" ! '3;- ;/~ !.,:ti:t::> '~'V"? / (:f:f ,::~")",,,f;~- ~~.... i '~,-i':""'"",' .e '~//I "',,' "'<-tv' -' "i// !"..(..// ,"'~) '-' ,~ ,3;- '<',,( ~~i r:: ',:'i'" '--..":7-' ....7~\\\~''?'w G- '- ~i} P=~~~~ tr /,-, ..--, MREQU1RED.REf!'R ;;~ \:r . (::;0/- ,;,. C~.,roC~REM"""TR~ "1f1 ~ r:;;., ---~"~--J G.- v<""~ ""'.--...... -~ PROTECT<ltlYWlRE~ 1,- ;H \, ,( G""~- G ; c.:"C-",,'^,_ '~= I ' \ "\\ 'i '"'' ~<J,'" G.. ' ~ -._~~....~ ,'" '\ ~~<< G ~ "... \ \, \".' G- J. . :::' REMcVETREEs ',-"'- < >:"';':';'}""'~""" \.~'\ G.~ G:',,' ~~ C. " ,~ ,,' '\ .... \\G. \,;r ~ \ \.\\ \'--- \ \ ....,..'" '"C..::~ ~ 5P//1 -----.J \\\W_ \\:i:- ~i ~ !...p..' ~v..M ~ --"c-~--\:~~- --.--'\ (c--. 4'", Co _J, G- t;;. G- _"i'" ( ;3\ i i ! / -"' / ' /,i'''' ("i-~C~ e::. " /' ,~ /,-, ',-r /"-b- 'Q~_G .'-v-'....~ r' '-""C- CD UPPER EAST lOT SCALE: 1" = 40" \~ , , ""1c:5~ ~- ~ I "",Gm ',?~{,;: , I ~'\. ,'-a I c], 'ti ,-L... -"~:. I' '" " " , '< '" it. " li NOTES , ~ '" 0;" ~ 1. THIS PLAN MAY NOT REFLECT ALL ElEMENTSREOUIRlNG REMOVALS NEcessARY TO FACILITATE CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTORSHALL VISIT THE SITE PRIOR TO BIODlNG ANO BECOME FAMI1.IAR WITH ACTUAL FIElD CONDITIONS. ElCTRACOMPENSATlON WILL NOTBEAl.LOWEDFORCONDlTIONS WHICH COULII HAVE BEEN DETERMINED ORAN1lCIPATED BYEXAMINATION OF THE SITE. Z. PRIOR TO START UP OF REMOVALS, THE CONTRACTOR MUST INSPECTTHE SITE ANO RECORD AKY DAMAGE TO EXISTING SITE FEATURES WIlICH ARE TO REMAIN. THE CONTRACTOR MUST SUBMIT A COPY TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRIl.CTOR SttALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR AlL DAMAGE ANO REPAIR COST NOT RECORDED AND AGREED UPON. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE TO SlTEAND PROTECT EXISTING VEGETATION AND SITE FEATURES (CURBS, WALKS,PAVEMENTS,OVERHEAD AND UNDERGROUND UTlLmES, SIGNAGE, ROADWAYS, AND DRAINAGE PIPING, ETC.} WHICH ARETO REMAIN. 4. REPAIR OR REPLACE, TO THE SATISFACTION AND AT NO COSTTO THE OWNER. ALL PROPERTIES AND SITE FEATURES WHICH WERE TO REMAIN BIIT DAMAGED BY THE WORK. 5. REFER TO SHEET 1, TITLESHEET,FORGENERAI.NQTES, 6. FIELII VERIFY ELEVATION TO CONFIRM ADJUSTMENT REOUIREMENTS lEGEND _ BITUMINOUS REMOVALS ---- SAWCl1T BITUMINOUS CURB REMOVALS @ I22Z2J TREE REMOVAL MASS TREE REMOVALS " " TREERSilOVALSCHEDIJl.E NUMBEft SPECIES SIZE GaLlnc!l , Box Elder , , Arboo"l"" , ; , BexElder , , Pine " , Pin. , . Pine , , , Pjne , , Maple " , Maple " " Maple " " Pine " " Maple " " Mapl. " H M""le " " Pine " " Maple ~ H M.., ~ " Pin" " " Pine " ~ Maple " " Art"'""t"" " T<>taIC.lip.rlncl1esR..,..",...;:I 285 c" (.- ,~""- '~~~E:- r.~. ,,~;,,;\,:'C~;~~ ~ ~ Jff,f:!f!+;~ L____/ !~' '}.:". rZ~? ;G~ ,.:: ;q -1>. /~.; ,'?:<~C;?"; ~"j"~,~~,7"...,,, " '","r'" ;/ ,)<",/ ,~I K'" . -', " '\' ,'\ '\.~ ~ /i ~ /'"-'/ )... i;j ~ ... C~ \...-~.... - , , ,~".', .... -,,\'.,'\.,'\<~.;;:. lr--, 'I/'! yt/>"'.... "':"?0- /j _~ -- \~~~~~:%~/Ui{t~-- "fr~,c~~~~~ ~~..-~---- \~/ M-r i V / i 'r,~:"~ ,:" ~ -c ~:"_~::__./~' f' i f/' :--1 ~_.. , , ;-. ~:~,..~v~/'/ c- V /~ ',r_{:.~5;~;:~,'. / /' (y.. _""" ~,;f// :1,; <:.'~: ~ ---, r'-- rBJrUMlIlCUS / r,~...----_ [i "~.l .-- \~ ~~~i TS< C- ~ .~1 c~ -f,',f,.~ ,~" ~4r (p (~_ l \ 't//, //\(7, ,;,,-o<'-~f#'\ (~ >8-,,' \ \ ' / / ~ <""... r-~'-' ~.'~ \ (~ \1:< '/~)\<7' \ '. ,~ r' \ v I . e:' \""~\"'~.,~,~.-.'. (~~ \~ j/,~ 1/\ _._ .-, " G~ \ / / 1",I,r"." 'r.l.< - ',- / i:...:,"e:~ r~"'::- r"'.... ~ V V ( 'I. r::... !r:"i,'",~- ,.,.,8'" \;' / /,/~,,_.....of . ~ '{I V I ' ! \. f\ - ~ G- <$ (;. @> ~ '>:l''' \ ~l:_~G' C' '~~(l~~ '" " '"'\:~'-.. , (:,~ " "'" C"'l r,~ ~ ~... ~_ Gs@;:~;p ~'"^' ~ ~ ""~~~ c.0.. \.;i%c~ y r;:.... \; ! \ ! y v (::ry. (3.. 4! <~ f '~-..I 'l, "'1.. j '\f 13;. -~ - ,- ,r:-~ ~ ". \-.-....,;;. ....._-_._---~-- '"..' ,,- '-.:-' s-.s'"' L,"'" ~ '-C" ~<i-C'. r.-('-~C-<;::- (:- ,,:. ./ C'" C- Z- r.- r:-o/"o.c- C"~. ~_ ~~ .... ~~ ""(2i::-~' . ,;,' C" >""ee- C-"".-",-.'-t?~r:"'" ~ 1(.....,,_.1..:,,- .....r.~~ ~ ~ \.;._ (::';(3;::" ~";:'>;;;-"':'~~.r:- e= cC r.-r.2- e-C" ~. 7<-~j--,....C"~ (;- _.' {."'""~-' ~ e" C"" ';c ~<..;. _._~..e' ""'e""'<__C-r.<-P ro=~...... r.-- __~,.", ~,_......-<;,;.,-=--,~-~ '-.:--- . >';'~'~':'f-- g ~ \ "'"=:.-.- 'v,/" ~" ~, '-.~ (:;,." "..-' \ .- ,,~ ~\ \\\ \ ,\,' \~\ \\. \\ \ \\\ \\\\\. \\\ }-\ ''\( , "'~!:::",~ "".,A"-/- ,[...\ ':i,;.. -~~ -' Jj)~'~:;;'P'-"-' ..-.e' l' ,-"<<,.;:' I,,' i\.\ ,,\>';' /. ';'''\ ' ~~ \\~\~/~/i_ ,'" " <" ,"<= ,.:" C: n- o...:, 'Z= CD SEMINARY DRIVE SCALE: 1" = 40" !II~'I ~ iD ~ .!~~~ l g.sti: ",' ~:~ ..!1:EC_e> "'-o..E::li ~]~i~ ~E:E~<; ~E-g ~; !:t;!~ :t!!i1l= j ~i~.g lii:,g ~ 15 " "'<.; ~~ '"'>:o::u ''''" ~g... f>1~ '"" f! " '" I- Z lU ::;: '" lU >- >~~ 0-" o:::~z o..wa:: -= ~:!: ~z ' -:If/) I-..J :t 0,.- ,," ...Jtffi "me Z '" - '" :.: c< <( 'll. \ = < . z <( -' ll. '" -' ;; o ::;: w c< J ~~ ~:I '. <. "N z i ~~~ "'...,-!- "';.:;,; ~;~ 0". 152it ". 6~ D, ~, -, ~~ ~' 2 Do ~2 ~~. "!>::5 "-"'--!- ~s~ ~g~ ~E~ ~ . I " . Z , . . ~ , N .>':;; " ; 'v'<' .~~. \' ,~.~& \ . ~ ~'::' \, \.'.0~ .T' . 1(' t " \ \:'~_~::'''-'''1, ~.= \ r-'::~' I 5 ~ !I II :1 I'll !i\ 07""11 vt i '" 1\ k---,- _J i f... ;> .~. I"~ '", ' '.' ,', "f ~ ""~ !. ....,.,;>. t., ,"> C !" .'.....l.'j~, "'j.. ~., (; c e '" 'r'.. ~, ,t... ~.: . f j.. ""'~l'" .... ''f''~ .:1:.:' --., . ~ f",- !-., '. 1/ (' ,'. ~~"'~:~~ ' ~.:., ---""'- ?~, ._..... h .,....j..~.- ~~~: ..il'.., :::::Il~'" .~:t:J:' '-" '~, ~ ^ -..:;, ')~, / >).. {;. '- 14;1 "- 1/ }',," " , , .', /# '" , , . . 7';~~JJ;~!~;~~'~ , \ C-f.T.:' 1, .---... fii1-- '-"---i . ~_, ~"" ;t..~t: _~ Sc{J . __J, --I - ~:: .., r.'t: ~t. ~2 ~: ;;. y:' ''A " 1--:-' ',' .,--.,'----. :~ ,,";,-,,, c c ,"', \.:.' \.::.' /''', V c..:., (:'c: ... \'. UPPER'EAST- . H)T.f~OUTH) AARKllIG'coJ::.., ADD 49 STALLS .~, C ({'2.,asis.F.) G C " \,\, h, ,,' (. ,;--"- ',,- " ,,,,,~ ".'~'\', ",", " ',"':, " ,\\ ", \,,\, \.\ \:~ ,,_\,~, " -'~~;~~ ~, '.,\' " s.:. (: C c ~ , c . -,r':"' ,'---- \ (':' \'''"' c c ~ " c ~ " '. '\ CD UPPER EAST LOTS SCALE: 1" = 40" FINISHING I LAYOUT NOTES -;;::;./.;-:,,' -4::::' \.;: ..-i:-- ."."..' - " -~ .\--\'<'~.~ - " ," " ;r-:; '\ '-.... ", '" ' ' '.',' ... 1. REf'ERTO SHEET 1,T1TlESHEET,FORGENERAl NOlES. CONCRETE CURB = MOOUtARBLOCKWAU. c=J POROUS PAVERS ~ 1/7S::-f'Z<a BITUMINOUS PAVENlENT ffi 10..- , PLANT SCHEDULE ABllREV. ~ " " " " Ory_ COMMON NAME 13 MAPLE_SUGAR 4 OAK.SWAMPWHTE 6 OAK. BUR S P1NE.AUSTRtAN 6 PINE-SCOTCH ~ t~ CS e: r-:- ',-~ C>',.\3~ r< "" ,. c c' '" ,-~ l..:" G- (' r2 , . \,~, *~ p """ G- t..:.. r." ',,' ~ ,,.. (;c G- (iC c' l...:;, r< ~ Cr:; ~ '\;.- C' ~ (;> C ~ Y< "'"" r "', c (: (' ~?: " s "..- (~., " , '" ", '-', (" , ,'v- " ">, r"> " "" - '"" ',,~ ,.." yO' ...._,...:.;~~ '"...."(:::---~_-:.:~-~ '~, '" :;-< :.- " \, '..... \\ \ \ \~.\ \\\' \-:,,\ \ \ \\ '-', \ \ CD SEMINARY DRIVE SCALE: 1" = 40" SCIENTIfIC NAME Ac..-saa:"arum OuOlClISbicolor QuOlClISmacrooa f'inllS~i.g", f'inllSsyI""stris c. /' ;___'0 >;, '-~ / (<<\::;:<~~;~<;~,~~<;'.,\,;...<,J'_" '-:-- --,,- , < ", " ,< ",J ,'< < < ," " '''\' ---", ,~ '-> i j f // ,.;,~f "r I;; r-'..".~.'-'" i < !/ v , ! / ,/ r / ~ V (.' 1/ ,--" ! / '~'" V/ ...+.~... "\// "'j-... SEMINA~Y DRIVE '"\""..- PAt$KI~ai AQD --- -\.--..~-- 27 STA!1LS.' . "_. --\- (11,053 $i.y ...:~.___. V I --~,,+ C \j, Vj ,/ G- ," (,;;..~-:-'~ G-.<:,- {l< "-F" ...- "",'G--G- ,-,,-"'1-;-0 G:.. ~~ ""'"'G, ~ '" "". I':' \..:;?"' .,--, 'v' c g \Zr. -,;. "'" ~ (; Z::..." ~_:C ,z>.;. p~r::;:B>:;: t2 r>.(; r oS .:i2 (; ". ~~'i"'< (' ".?p<': (.'<S(.'(~, r.-(2'" r-' .>:' t2 7<~-';" !';c'--f,:' ... <' {':' '0' '-~"'"' ~,:- A - >;:.; -,;,,.:, "':::''':''i? (:''':'t':'<,;.1,.:,r. r-. ...,,(: ':-;2 <~ 'C.::~-.;.'f.''':: (;: ...-;.:..,.... ~\;,;2 ,r:.~ -C ~ ..:.! '>:.< (:.>C.... ~ :.;.~~ -.;. -"'"" \"2,.ro -";"12 >2 ~-.:........ ~ j-:.<';'JZ '" p ~r.::B <,.;. '"" >.;'.~Ct t:-. " (:; "''''. t..:" c ,..-,Y\ --;)1 \C': ; ,~" ~~t~ "---...,1>, ,t: ~"+~ J ,--:-' c~ .~"-.,.'t._._, '~0 /1 -/ /~ ., /) /; /:1 /i /) /i ./\ / Ar ,. / ..."t; < , " ,( ~ /\ /1; '/ ....," '. ' "" '" " ' " " '. "- " ,,,',,,, """ ; fu"'~ " ""~~~-'---~-::~. ~~ ttr' tr-~----'~~_ -' -'--- , , --....\""""...- ....~,..- ...-\--... -\:-,... ~" l...:;, .' " ~ol ~~,~ ~ ~ , z ii; ~ .! ~~~ c,--,<c> Il- OCUa: ",' ::~ ;i~~~ :~:}i; :P:E~'O ~E-g~; ~1I;]~ fltli ! ~ " ~'" c\:: ;;:;u ~u~ CC "il :;j" !1! " '" f- Z W :;: <( W 0- >j::g 0-'" o:::~z a..w::E -.:::C::!: ~z- -::l~ f--'-' o~s: -,o-z "'''' Clmo Z a: - <( >:: 0:: < 0.. . < . -Cl Clz z_ -0.. iJ5< zOz -"'< u.o-, -zo.. f-< ::>-, 00 >-z :5< J f5~ ~~. ~:l ~N i i ~,~ "'~~ "'''';,; ~::<~ ~~~ 1;j~a: ~~ t ,- ~~ ~ u. ~~ u' ~", ~~~ H~~ ~.. ~~~ ~ . . ~ ~ J " ~ ~ , M !;t,~~~l.,,/'~':\Zc..':.;~f....',X;...~,t:.t,t.~\:> //:;;,f(, ~ \." .'p \.. ,~ +, ~ '(' ,. .,\, ~ \\:;'1:~~'f (ii, \', : ';~-~i'~s_J~\\\\~-"~i'" · ~ - :;;J)llld~ -/ -it : _:.u I)' H ~:: \~ 'V~' X{J4-. --; \,~ ! \ A" 1"1 1_ -u' 7W - i >, ' I"" l ' /'l.~ '&~i\') ,/' f.! I j'".~;; ~ :'!, .,~, ;'''''.~~\/L " ;~ "f,:::, f"/;.J -): L\~> ~I/!f';-~.':;;f-~, '~""<~" :.~L\ ~ .1//.__ ;, ..... ....If'''' -~-~." ,,,,,-,'"',\!:'" '~'1"~~, .-".~ .'1 -I ! ;'\':;r::::..:- ->......~'-.......- ~'~ :.> _ ,.(".~ / <." / -:;,\ ~; , ~~', -.' . j 9'..1;..... -' >.... =~' ,/ ___' ,al ~":;f~~~~',;-' L,} L. \':':}€ ~! _-__~--="',---~~ -+"__:: ,-\'-...- -', -'~'eu , _\,.~,-,,__~__ _~ '"C.......__:J2'~\,' , ;. ~,--, ~i~.._.-..=__<~.:r"'~~J;;~-,r..;;, ':'-: ..",~~'~ ,/ \~\, -'- - -..... ~~i">'" --- ,j>.i,..-~.~"'!i __jJ?.1-::-=rr..; __U~~~~,.; \ ,v .1,' , ;'" ~'------M t~,I1'1' ~ 'IU- '<><:-....~ .,. ,-'a -;p;::;. l "" ..~ l~, -....., ~ - ..c \' ~ ..jP-f",^,~,,-1f,;'l\""'_:V<: ~ """ '<>i ' ,r...l~ .....-_~ ~) ~ "- A " ~ '.~ ....., 1 ~-~ I ;''''"'- _I ~. ../,' I ; "',>i- '- -<'"' /,,~~':'_---; 4 ~\[j'>;' ">~~!,,;:--L-- -rl~-;-~ ~ 1"'" ! f : ',~ ~ ? :1,,',..,:..,.>:.,.,.'>..__..~\. ""~~fii'...~,.;...:~. ::~..:~;:(,',~,",\:,:~, ","~.~."",'~,~_~,..,)l~--i""/;"_' \ \ !~i jl ''',.~: \," ......:.';'~~-::\<,:p ... 'y., j ~~~t..U-'"' ,; !! ;' /: J~y/,,( "'--. ~ "-, '-,/<, "~'-'''''';'/-} ~" 'FI~:~~. -~~i ~; uflJj~::~ ~::~~j~~}1< ~~?r~1\';' \,i 1 .....}r.-..= ~U".\\'"ii'7 ,\:::yC}" " '~/ -"', ~ I " ~ ,_, \'" "-\"II<,J] ;"\'\t'~ '-,-"""~J/ ",,~"~' '~'_':'<!)~:f:~:"':;;: r-Tf'.t1,\\\\~~ \. ".'--- '-. "'V/:/ 'S- ", (I!.....; II 1 I' 1'\\ I :! '; \ '\, ,,.>,.. ',',<< -"'U1~-SNf.=;J1NGI! I "~11 \ij \ . .'.\. ~ ."- '-< //~< ',~f'EWf'LEV.l!=5li 1.--1 j /~,.1:; \ f: \ \ '- ......., \ -, ~"' / ""', "'/01' , .1." ~ fj 1 !,,~i i ; i 11 -\-'. "\-', \ \/""Y....,'., '-Ii J ! J' :t-, \ J!i I \-'I"~ ':it~~ y.'",', ~" ~ ~ ./ -, : .... '_.:;'" \ (~!, ~ t ! ,j ~ ::~~~~~:~~::::.,..~~,\~ ~ .'<, ltjr1ri,ti"" r , , \ , \ . '....... >', ".~ ,r w-....~ \,~ I 1 '~~l 1 ':. "'i '\>~\' -'("::r-~;:.'"'-> --'- '" '. ,'~ <0', "ii:::W k~) \ I ; i-~ ' <)?<.Y'-\~~.' .....~ "4.PPER,EASl:, '.......,.., "'"I .--.::"'i .ft' ' \ " ,":". ~ \,\~, "\~ "" L'"O:J:./SOUTH) -', -f~H1)"t. I,~' \ \:, ; ~r\ ',}.;' ".~.:.._ \.!!!J~, 'J:;;..'"\;.........."~. ',I '. ' I /'" '_, I.' \ , , "1' --;;il,..:~~"" ...-#'t~N\:II'~:r-, ,I, 1'1l"'<\"'; ",,",,,.'Wi~-'M~'~""" '~',,}, "...J-l" ;');~:' "':--\','" :-'~'-'.,....,..__""'-.ADD ~~.,'A.LL :.--~:.,~, . . I':t" \.'.'\;i ~~'"'{' " ",' ~ - "'""@~ ~~,' A~ G120 3J;s ~'" '{l"'''~1'~'\-'' '< I j ii--, ,,\ ': ~ ~~lt~~i~~~t .' J\~~l\i~\-: \\\\.a:..,' \@,t.....""\' ,:;v>"-,,\I-Sq"'\~:\~I!"I(7J\~y.""'~:l.4"l\._" it: -';\,i.}{: . \\' \1\ "-,' \<>""J'" ~ '- '. <1iu \'; "\,\ "- , ';""U1W l' \, \ "t.. L. !,,;,: l \\ \ q ~ . ~ a- ., "", ,. > '\ ~. ,\,~. '" 'V'.\Hli'-" '1 \ ~i \ i" tJ" Z I ' ;', . ._~, , ~:!~~~ "1"~1f .~ \",,~\\,\?\:~<~~~~~,*~'l\~\~r\~;I"r' f!T~! i~i c. "", ~ ~ '" ~ ~ >n ~'u 'i " .' ~" \r-~" , \ .j '!. "'-i '0\,1, \\ m "' ~ t t'i ~ i ,,- " \,L ~ I'. i ,'.i;. ,;\ ;;:j~':~, ;; '" >...., \.... ~ <~~ -" , \\' " il ,\ ~~~\ - ' 'i ." " i' i' ., . , ,.,~ ! ,. .~f I l ~ il ; ;' +11 > , i H~i ; 'if '''', CD UPPER EAST lOT SCALE: 1" = 40" GRADING NOTES 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR AND PAY FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION STAKING I LAYOUT. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ANO PAY FORALLRELATEDCONSTRUCTlON PERMITS {INCLUDING NPDES PER/,IIT FROM MPCAj. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAGE (CONSTRUCTION ZONES) NECESSARY TO CONSlRUCT PRoPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. 4. ALL EROSION CONTROL METHODS SHAlL COMPLYWlTH MPCAANDLOCAL REGULATIONS. 5. MAINTAIN ADJACENT PROPERTY AND CITY STREETS CLEAN FROM CONSTRUCTION CAUSED DlRT AND DEBRIS ON A DAILY BASIS, PROTECT DRAINAGE SYSTEMS FROM SEDIMENTATION AS A RESULT OF CONSTRUCTION RELATED DIRTAtW DEBRIS. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHAl.L SCHEDULE AND CONDUCT OPERATIONS SO AS TO MINIMIZE EROSION OF SOILS AND TO PREVENT SILTING AND MUDDYING OF STREAMS AND DRAINAGE SYSTEMS. 7, PROPOSED CONTOURS AND SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN TO FINISH GRADE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 8. PROPOSED ELEVATIONS SHOW TYPICALLY 18.7 OR 19 SHALl.. BE UNDERSTOOD TO MEAN 919.7 OR 9t9 OR AS OTHERWlSEAPPUCABLE. 9. THE CONTRACTORSHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBlE FORDETERMlNING QUAHTITlES OF FILL AND WASTE MATERlALS TO BE HANDLaJ, ANtl FOR AMOUNT OF GRADING TO BE DONE IN ORDER TO COMPlETEI. Y PERFORM ALL WORK INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS. in. NO FINISHED SLOPES SHALL EXCEED 3' HORIlONTAL TO 1'VERTlCAL(3:1), UNLESS OTHERWlSE NOTED. 11. LOCATEALL EXISTING UTIUTIES, VERIFY LOCATION, SIZE AND INVERT ELEVATION OF ALL EXISTING UT1UTJES. VERIFY LOCATIONS, SIZES AND ELEVATIONS OF SAME BEFORE BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. 12. ALL DISTURBED AREAS WHICH ARE NOT DESIGNATED AS BUILDING OR TO BE PAVEO SHALL RECEIVE AT LEAST 6" OF TOPSOIL (SALVAGE EXISTING AND SUPPLEMENT AS NECESSARY). ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHAU BE SODDED, AS INDICATED ON DRAWINGS. 13. BENCHMARK: GENERALLY STOOP ELEVATlON(S) OFBUILDlNGSHALL BE USED FOR BENCHMARKS. VERIFY WITH LANOSCAPEARCfDTECTTO SlTEWORK. 14. ENTIRE LENGTH OF DRAIN TILE WITHIN STORAGE AREAS SHALl.. REMAIN AT SPECIFIED INVERT. WHERE CONNECTION IS MAIlE TO THE MAIN THAT LEAVES THE STORAGE AREA, ALL PIPES SHALL BE saUD. lEGEND EB L.~"1 c::J REFERENCE KEY TO srre DETAILS DETAIL I.D. NUMBER (TOP) SHEET NUMBER (BOTTOM) EXISTING CONTOUR EXISTING SPOT ElEVATION -939___ PROPOSED CONTOUR L= PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION ME'" MATCH EXISTING ~ PROPOSED STORM SEWER ~ PROPOSED DRAIN TILE {6" D1} MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL E!1 i- SILT FENCE ffi 0 '" '" G:~ ~ ft:.; ~. ;/l k {,ii;; .."~ ~. ~';~ jJti ~'r ~ ~ '~:~:::f~~i _~:_,,:..:;:....:,r;::m.'".___ .",__ ::~~:,\~,\':"~~:'S-:";': f' :\ci -, ~, (,l. " ,0,. _-:~ ("f:;< >.;r- >~\~..", ~ \. ~S?: \ ,'\,;'\,~ " . . , (ire: ,~. ~ ,~ ., '"," ~\\::, '-~'.... "'" /,~ ,,",', '- -----~-; -, r<_ : .~. _.-- ....'1"'-; \. '- l-''S ~-<~ .# -.~ ::.J!fi;,/ '..w.t-,< t:JP. Y:~~__'_~~~'":'"'~.&t~ >.:i5R ~ W' "CP . , 7~ \-"" , ~ 'W' , '-, ..r. )",- ...'*, 6"llTfffIlOTTOMOi:x~ lIASEMATEfllAL .~, ~ r:^'. .~~ " ..", "'~ '~ .-.- .-~ :;&"--. - -.-.----~--.-rj;:.. ~ -''',.-.,.- --(~---,-- """"" -'--' '(.y .,~;.~' - ~;--",\zct - C~ ~'-'" "-~ .,: {~ \ \_:w ,W,,," '~ ~ ~ \ " .~~ ~~ <~, \r< ,,\.\ , \\ F' .,' CD SEMINARY DRIVE SCALE: 1" = 40" ~ , "I egg.~ " ~(P~ !i '" < l ~ ~:i cOUll< W C) <(ZZ ~0:5 ~C;;<L 00-1 0::0 C)'WO:: ZO'" -ZZ 0<(0 ~ () C) " >~ 0" ~'i>~ ~i~l~ 5~ '0 ~ li,E :to- :=J ~E"g ~; 'E ,.."'g.!:!,2 !;(~ 1l~.P.d ". fll]j! < i ~ ~,~ l::l~~ ~Si~ '~, ~~~ ~ ~~ c. 0, ~ ~ :;, , " ~~ " C ~' ~ ' ~~ " C'-' ~~ "',:"l:lJ '~'" ~, ~g.... ~~;;; :>1~ ",-"'::;: "4" ~~~ ~ ~8t " ~~~ en ... Z W :;; " W ... >~g 0-,. ~ ~fQ~ ffi <L" - :E~ ~ > Z . . -:l~ , ... -"-" . O~s: < l;; ....Iliiffi . C)mC Z '" - " :.: 0:: <( <L ~ , ~ " \.:t " \: woo. W~W POSTS' 4'lIlA.(lolINI 1.3lb<1lf("'I HeAVYOO1Y (lFU5EO'MlH @W1MA>:} @S'(MAlQ SuPl'DRTl'EN""l SPACING SPACING NORMALUSE ,- 2"SQ.(MIN) U'bsJIf(NIN.J...."'" (lfUseDWITIlDlrr fH"(NAX) "lrSECTlONQ!4' SUPPOflTFENCEj SPACING (IMX}SPAaNG DPTlDIiALSUPI'CIR,FBfCE ""~W-1 METAl-STAKE ORWOODPOST 3"MlN. ""-~ ~ ~m~=~~~~I~ S'MIHlDMll\iPOST EHGIHEeRlHoFAIlRIC OVElll..APF.....RlI:.1!ICHES AtIOFASTSN@2'IN'lERVALS &TEtlDWlRENEsHIHT01RENCH JSW~J NOTE: DEPENDING UPON CONFIGURATION, ATTACH TO WIRE MESH WITH HOG RINGs,. STEEL POSTS WITHTIE WIRES, OR WOOD POSTSWITHSTAPlES CD SILT FENCE .-= STAKElOBEPlACEOAT TCEOFSL1lPE.BOTllSlllES INSTAlLATION DETAIL WooosTAKE WOODSTAKETO ~ff~ MATER1A1-0NlY STAKE DETAIL CD SEDIMENT LOG pROl'ERTYIR.O.W.LlNE ~~, (MnlDOTCLASSV) NOTE, PROVIDE WHERE CONSlRUCllON TRAFFIC ENTERSOREXlTSTHECONSlRUCTTONSrTE '"MINlMUM'TlIICIlIlESS CD ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE MgJAl.SEWE!ll:AST!IfG. REFERTOS1lUJCTVRE~ SClfEDUI..EI'<lRTU'f f,UN.2A1l0w.x.sAllJUSTlNG IlWGS.GRrnl"rBE'IWaON RlH6S.CASl1N<1,ANl>Al.OIIG ~,~ ...N"!liNAllDH STOR!dSl1WE!lp..e.SH'- PUUlFORU>CAnDN, .NVBrr,ANDSllES SASESSIW..I.IIES" srAN>WloPRECAST WlTH2"lEAIlGRO\1T, ORPOUIlEO!"Sl..All RSlNl'ORCEDWlTH "'~.'lll11.MESH I'ROVlCEZ' SUMPA,ALL lITRUCTURES PHECASTCOtfCRETE BecnOI< CD CATCH BASIN Il~3FJk~ lI111ffillir, ji*lli~ COllPACTeDCRtISlEIIRocK ORPEAGRAYH-,.QO%PASSING 1HE:II."S1EVEANOA_ OF5%PASS'NGlHE~'SIE\'E. NOTES: TRENCH SIDEWALLS TO MEET o.s.H.A REQU1REMEN.TS. UPPER 3 FT. OF BACKFILL SHAU BE COMPACTED TO AT LEAST 100% STANDARD PROCTOR DRY DENSITY. BELOWTHtS ELEVATlDN,flACKFIl..L SHALL BE COMPACTED TO AT LEAST 95% STANDAAD PROCTOR DRY 0ENSlTY. CD PIPE BEDDING - RCP & DIP NOTES, TRENCH SIDEWALLS TO MEET O.s.HA REQUIREMENTS. UPPER3 FT. OF f1ACKFlLL SHALL BE COMPAClED TOAT LEAST101l% STANOARD PROCTOR DRY DENSITY. BelOW THIS ELEVA1"lON, 5ACKflLL SHALL BE COMPACTED TO AT LEAST 95% STANDARD PROCTOR DRY DENSITY. CD PIPE BEDDING - PERFORATED PVC R1PRA>'.R6'E!l Tffi NOTES: 2.'II'BOLTFASTENSflSTOBEIMSTAU.SDACROSS~ JO'Nf,otIEEACliSIOEOFP'PEKr"'FRoM1HETOPOF TlfEP'PE.FASTENFlRSTtHREE.JOIN'ISASSHOWN. CD RCP FLARED END SECTION (FES) P<o~'~~~_~ ~.- "ETALSEwERCASTlt!G_ NEalAKR-1'J;l /..'....AIlOI4M.5AOJIISTlNGRlNGS- Gf<OUTBETWEENRlNGS,CAS'TINU,ANll /ILONGll\ITSIDE. rBmJMINOUSPAVEllerr f; I L ~ ~ I'RECASTCONCRETeCONEsa:tlOIl STEPSONDO\\'NS1'REMlS'DE CD CONCRETE CURB RIBBON smRllsavEl!.pIPE_sEE UTIUT1'PL.ANfORLocATlDN, 'NVaU,ANDSIZES "FACEOFCURII" l:3BAlTER .;. PROVlDErSUMp ATAU.~ 3"RADIOS SLOPE-'I4"PERfOOTTOWARDS PAVBlBlTOHII\GHSIllEOf L01lDRIVE_SLOPI'''''"P6l FooTToWARDSBACKOFCIJRB f.o<:EONLOWSIOEOFLOTIORIVE. " II 112'RAQlUS 1 A<lORE<lATEBASETOIlE ~pL.ACEl>aYPAvmG CONTRA"'fImW""'-l BASESSllA1.I.8ea"STANl>ARDPRECASI'wrmrl-"""'GROUT.OR PoUREOa"Sl..AIIRElNFORCEDWITH","xO"1011oWESH CD NClTE,DlRl1CTlONOFTRANSVERsEGUT1B<SUlPETOMATCH DIRECTlONOFADJACEflTPAI'EMENfSLOPE. STORM SEWER MANHOLE CD B-612 CURB AND GUTTER PAVEREDGEfI, 'oVllERI"APPIJ"""1.E SECTlONB_S CD POROUS PAVERS SECTlONA_A CD RIPRAP - FLARED END SECTION cv CD RETAINING WALL CD MEDIUM DUTY PAVEMENT SECTlONB-B !.. i:;~ ~~ . SECTlONA-A CD CURB OUTLET t/) .... Z w ::E .. w ... >i:~ O-w a::~z l1.wa; -=.2::E ~:z- -:::l~ ....~~ O~S: ...JI-Z WW Cl" " z '" - .. >:: c:: <( 0.. ~ ~ ~ z , ~ ~ . Lt') Attachment 3C-2 City Engineer and Building Official Review ~ ~HILL8 September 5,2007, Planning Commission Meeting ~ ~ EN HILLS MEMORANDUM DATE: August 28, 2007 TO: James Lehnhoff, City Planner Kristine Giga, Civil Engineer ~ FROM: SUBJECT: Planning Case #07-022 Bethel University Parking Lot Expansion The following are comments based upon a review of the submitted site plans with a revision date of 8/22/07: General . The developer is responsible for acquiring all necessary pennits, which may include, but is not limited to, NPDES, Rice Creek Watershed District, Ramsey County and City Erosion Control pennits. . The plan sheets must be sigued by a registered professional. . Maintenance of all utility improvements will be the responsibility of the developer, as the proposed improvements are all within private property. Sheet 3- Lavout. Finishing and Landscaping Plan . The hatch symbols are not properly identified in the legend (porous pavement is blank). Please edit as needed. Sheet 4- Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan . The legend lists proposed storm sewer; however, none is shown on the plans. Please identify any proposed storm sewer pipe and structures. . Retaining walls greater than four feet in height will need to be designed by a certified engineer. . Retaining walls four feet in height and taller will require railings for safety purposes. . Please add to General Note 4 that traffic control devices and signing shall conform to the MMUTCD, including the Field Manual for Temporary Traffic Control Zone Layouts, Latest Edition. Sheet 5- Site Details . Please identify on appropriate plan sheets where application of the following details is proposed: 2, 3, 4,5,7,8 and 9. \ \Metro-inet.us\ardenhills\PR&PW\Engineering\2007\Planning_ Cases\07 -022_ BetheI\07-022 _ Bethel.doc Plan Review Comments Page 1 of I ~ ~HILLS Plan Review Comments 8/22/07 Comments 1. Rice Creek and DNR approval required. 2. Appears to be proposed in Xcel energy easement area. Requires approval from Xcel? 3. Must maintain a minimum 20 foot wide clear access drive along Seminary Drive. 4. Location of new accessible parking stalls to be pre-approved by the City before installation. Attachment 3C-3 Area Map, Air Photo, and Photographs of the Site ~ ~HILL8 September 5, 2007, Planning Commission Meeting :;; ~ . ~ il..;gli <l ~B 11;:- .~]1:l ~l~ df~f~1 Hj~HHI1H 1!iI::; ~,\~,,-liiO If o . s "@ .0 o . " o "0 " " <8 ~ o -0 ~ :; .0 o .g;.;< .-. E5~ <2"''''0 .$ ~o; ~'f5 8 Q,~ f:l e!:l ~~"'O d~ !a .g e~ ~.s~ s:--o E 8~E C':l~8 .~~.s g<;r-- 8...g .~]N I' . . ~ 0 ~,g~ ~:fl 1ls~ rgu~ o..g e: ~ g'g .g] .. W"8 MOll B;e ~ .~~"O *" 8 g a ~ iil o "'-0 ~a3 ..0 .8u e:!f:.s l::l'::!:"-- g.E!O sOO -0]: ~""dN ~ :; . " 0 0 ~ ll:; a<ll..., a~~ ~::l e .0<:> t I..l~ U oS ;0>" '~'a: ~ o ~ ~ .~.gj g.~] :;.5~ ~~f; ..C':!O "'"" ,".s", "J'l" <-11 ... u " a ~ 0; '" ~ " o " ~ B Hi' ",*i",j ~jiI g,~~~ ~s;c'i2!~ ~-55!I/I!ij u01:'iJ:", ::)Q.8/tz ~J~:g~]Si~~f! ,., \'\~\D " ~ g'w .- al -c ~ 8:<>: "C :5 Q) .- w w o C c.al e e- a.w ;;: o " 5 o .. 5 " " o ." "0 . 0 a .8 .~ ;;'>a E~~ ~~:a .- 2 ~~<. ti Q.,g g8~ ':::1::"@ o ~.::: l5~ 5 "p...:;;! """ :;:;:<Sf=: S''"d'O 8~~ '" <l).~ .~.D ~ 1ij<; 8 s.- E .~18 ':=,;..si g~r- o,..e8 ""N "" 1S~3 ;gQ;l':":. $-=s g.~~ -0]"8 -801)0 5 ~d~ .5 ~ 'O~o :;ge .- " -o.,g-o .'0. >>.,,- ~ a 8 o " ~ : 8 a:~ :3 c..:; 0 g.eu 8].8 .,,~~ -E"'Oo oa~ ~ 0 . ~s~ -" i,i'"3 J:l!3'7'l, ~ 8 e lL60 .~.~ ~ .~ g ~ 0.:1: '" o:l~...J S c 0 r,/)._..= :a-of- .... 0 . .. '51"- ffi,g8 :::E5~ <.g~ ... ~ ~ Ci E '" lo; ~ ... .... = ~ - ~ -= .... ~ =:l on '" ~ o '" Vi ro W Qj a. a. :::J "0 Ol "' o a. o ~ a. Ol E '0 c c 00 ~'Ci5 '-' c .Q~ Ol x .eOl ;0 m~ :;: c Ox - ~ .ero ~ a. "- g-s 0)" cO x~ o~ 00 -' -' .e :; o C!!- -0 -' Vi ro W ~ Ol a. a. :::J "0 Ol "' o a. o ~ a. Ol E ~ o c -Q ro '-' .Q Ol E "oc ro 0 :;: -;;; .8 ~ .e~ :; Ol ~.2 0)0) .S c '" -- o~ o ro -' a. >- ~ - ro"O c ro "E e Ol Ol U)E g'o o Ol 00"0 0> -00 .S t) '" ro ro Ol o.Ol OlE Ec -oai o Ol ~ C..o " .Q "0 t5 ro ""5 "a. '-' 0 .Q~~ woo;::: -Ern 0 "Ew~ Ctl 0>.- :;: C "' .8:s2.E ..c ro .2> - a. ~ 5 Q) CD CI)..cz 0)1- .!!l c _ x<D"f5 o.~ :c .30:;: -0 c -'-- ~Ol ~..o w= ~ :;: Ol C 0.0 0.__ :::J"' c "Oro Ol a. "' x o Ol 0.0) e c 0.-- '" Ol ~ .ero ~ a. ~Ol O.e Cf- o :g '-' .Q Ol E c o _ .00 co c Ol ro ~ o.ro x>- "OOl", m +J U) 5:.Q ~ 00)0) ~ c Ol t):s2-E ctlmO) Ol a. c 0)_ 0 .S -E ro "'~ 00"0 o Z C -' _ ro .~ ~HILLS MEMORANDUM DATE: September 5, 2007 PC Agenda Item 3.D TO: Planning Commission FROM: James Lelmhoff, City Planner SUBJECT: Planning Case #07-023 Variance Frank & Christine Pistotnik 1163 Benton Way The applicant has withdrawn the variance request. No action is required. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor September 5, 2007 \\Metro-inet.uslardenhillslPlanningIPlanning Cases\2007\07-023 Pistotnik Variancel090507 - PC Report - Pistotnik Variance - Withdrawn. doc Pagel of 1 ~ ~HILLS MEMORANDUM DATE: September 5, 2007 PC Agenda Item 3.E TO: Planning Commission FROM: James Lelmhoff, City Plann~ SUBJECT: Planning Case #07-018 - Continued Arden Plaza, LLC (Dennis Trooien) 3527 Lexington Avenue North Southwest corner of County Road E and Lexington Avenue Master Planned Unit Development, Final PUD for Phase 1, Preliminary Plat, and Final Plat ATTACHMENTS: 3E-I 3E-2 3E-3 3E-4 3E-5 Letter from Applicant and Response to Proposed Conditions Revised Site Plans Revised Sheets A3.1 and A3.4 Potential Alternative Site Plan Public Comments/Letters Reauested Action The applicant is requesting review ofthe Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development of Phase I, Preliminary Plat, and Final Plat of the Arden Plaza redevelopment proposal. The Planning Commission is not being asked to provide a recommendation to the City Council at this time. This application will be tabled to the October 3, 2007, Planning Commission. Update On August 1,2007, the Planning Commission held a public hearing for the proposed redevelopment of the Arden Plaza property, which is located at the southwest corner of County Road E and Lexington Avenue. The application was tabled at that meeting pending the submission of additional traffic data that was requested by Ramsey County and City Staff, The City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor September 5, 2007 \\Metro~inet.us\ardenhillslPlanninglPlanning Cases\2007\07-018 Arden Plaza PUD (In Review) \090507 - PC Report - Arden Plaza - Master PUD.doc Page 1 of7 applicant is in the process of preparing the requested information; however, it was not ready in time for the September 5,2007, Planning Commission meeting. Although the traffic information is not ready for review, the applicant has requested to appear before the Planning Commission at the September meeting to discuss changes that were made to the redevelopment proposal after the August meeting (Attachments 3E-l, 2, and 3). The applicant is seeking feedback on the changes. The applicant has also submitted an alternative site plan for proposed buildings three and four for discussion purposes (Attachment 3E-4). The applicant is also seeking feedback on this potential site plan. The letter submitted by the application in Attachment 3E-I includes additional information about the potential alternative site plan. Proposal and Process 1. Project Description The 12.55 acre Arden Plaza property has a 52,390 square foot retail strip mall, and a 53,285 square foot office building (the pod office building). The applicant proposes to demolish the office building, construct three new buildings, and subdivide the property into four lots: Lot and Building* Proposed Lot Size (sf) Building Coverage (sf) % Building Coverage Lot 1 - Existing Retail Strip Mall 287,693 52,390 18.21% Lot 2 - Proposed Walgreen's (Building A) 80,229 14,490 18.06% Lot 3 - No tenanl (Building B) 69,520 17,640 25.37% Lol4 - No lenant (Building C) 44,075 14,355 32.57% Total Lots 1-4 481,517 98,875 20.53% *Lot and building numbers are from Sheet C1 The retail strip mall would remain unchanged. The proposed tenant for Lot 2 is a Walgreen's store. The developer does not yet have tenants for lots three or four. This proposal technically includes four requests: I. Master Planned Unit Development for Phases 1-3 of the Arden Plaza Redevelopment 2. Final Planned Unit Development for Phase I ofthe Arden Plaza Redevelopment 3. Preliminary Plat 4. Final Plat City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor September 5, 2007 \lMetro-inet.uslardenhills\PlanninglPlanning Cases\2007\07-018 Arden Plaza PUD (In Review) \090501 - PC Report ~ Arden Plaza - Master pun.doc Page 2 of7 2. Planned Unit Development (PUD) Process: The Planned Unit Development (PUD) process is typically at least a two step process. The first step is the Master PUD, and the second step is the Final PUD. In some instances, the Final PUD or a portion ofthe Final PUD is reviewed with the Master PUD. In other instances, the development is separated into phases over a period of time. This application is a hybrid version of these two options, which is permissible. The PUD process is a tool that provides additional flexibility for developments that an underlying zoning district would not otherwise allow. For example, a PUD may change the setbacks, lot coverage, lot sizes, parking requirements, signage, building height, building materials, landscaping requirements, etc. The process is meant to create a better development than the standard regulations may otherwise allow. While each PUD process can be somewhat unique, it is a common processed used by many cities. Typically, the PUD process cannot be used to permit uses that would not otherwise be permitted in the underlying zone. If a property is subdivided into multiple properties during the PUD process, it is still often viewed as one continuous development. The development as a whole would be expected to meet the landscaping, stormwater, and other similar requirements. For example, one property in the PUD may have forty percent building coverage; however, the development as a whole does not exceed 25 percent building coverage to maintain conformance with the underlying zone. In order to maintain shared amenities such as landscaping and stormwater ponds, the development is required to create a legal entity to manage and maintain the shared amenities. During the Master PUD stage, the City works with the applicant to set an overall design framework or standard for a proposed development, which generally includes the design standards, the size of the development, and what, ifany, deviations from the underlying zoning district will be permitted. Once the Master PUD is approved, the applicant then creates a development that conforms to the design standards for the Final PUD stage. The level of detail is guided by the type and scale of the development as well as the guidance or flexibility within the Zoning Code. 3. Surrounding Area: North Commercial B-2: General Business District Hotel South Commercial B-2: General Business District Office East Commercial C2: General Commercial & OFC: Gas Station/Retail/Office Office West Commercial B-2: General Business District Interstate 35W City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for September 5, 2007 \\Metro-inet.uslardenhi//slPlanning\P/anning Cases\2007\07-018 Arden Plaza PUD (In Review)\090507 - PC Report - Arden Plaza - Master PUD.doc Page 3 of7 4. Site Data: Commercial Retail strip mall and office building B-2: General Business District 12.55 Acres (546,717) The elevation of the lot is lower than Lexington Avenue. There is a stormwater pond in the southeast corner of the property. Plan Evaluation Please review the changes that have been made to the redevelopment proposal since the August meeting, which are provided in the attachments submitted by the applicant. The applicant has revised the sign plan, exterior styling on the proposed Walgreen's building, the pedestrian connections, and other exterior changes to the development recommended in the draft conditions provided by Staff in the August planning case memo. A review of the sign plan is provided below; however, a more complete plan evaluation will be prepared by Staff prior to the Planning Commission taking action on the proposal. Shm Plan Proposal The applicant has submitted a revised wall and monument sign plan for the proposed Walgreen's store. Attachment 3E-2 includes a full set of plans for the entire property, including a revised sign plan. The applicant further modified the building design and sign plan after the full set of plans were submitted, which is included in Attachment 3E-3. Because the property is adjacent to County Road E and Lexington Avenue, it is in sign district 4 and 5. The Sign Code does not indicate which sign district is the controlling district. Sign Code Sign District (Section 1240) 4 5 Area 6051 8051 Wall Lighting E/I/B E/I/B Area 8051 10051 Freestanding Height 221 161 Lighting E/I/B E/I/B E1I1B:extemal,intemal,orbackllt City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor September 5, 2007 IlMetro-inet.uslardenhillslPlanninglPlanning Cases\2007\07-018 Arden Plaza pun (In Review)\090507 - PC Report - Arden Plaza - Master PUD.doc Page 4 of7 The revised Walgreen's sign plan includes (Attachment 3E-2): Revised Wall Sign Plan (sf) Exterior Walgreen's Wall Building 2 Building 3 Original Revised East 67.53 63.85 46.9 80 North 67.53 63.85 69.6 80 West 36.83 27.62 69.6 0 South 36.83 0 0 0 Total 208.72 155.32 186.1 160 For the proposed Walgreen's building, the north and east walls include three signs: a 33.15 square feet "Walgreen's," a 11.6 square foot "Photo" sign, and a 19.1 square foot "Pharmacy" sign. There is also a 35.1 square foot internal sign at the northeast entrance to the proposed store, which is unchanged from the original proposal. All wall signage has been removed from the south side of the building, and the "Walgreen's" sign on the west side of the building has been reduced in size. The LED electronic display portion on the proposed monument sign at the northeast corner of the property has been removed. The three separate monument signs have remain otherwise unchanged. Signage for phases two and three will be determined during that separate review process. The PUD process permits flexibility in terms of size, number, and dimensions of the signs. Resident Comments Notice was published in the Shoreview-Arden Hills Bulletin and mailed to properties within 500 feet of the property for the August I, 2007, Planning Commission meeting. A new notice is typically not sent when applications are tabled. Staff has received a number ofletters and emails related to this application, which are included in Attachment 3E-5. Draft Conditions of Approval Staff provided a draft set of eighteen conditions in the August 1,2007, planning case memo. The conditions have not been finalized and can be changed. The draft conditions were meant to provide discussion points. The applicant has responded to a number of the draft recommended conditions as described in Attachment 3E-I. The draft conditions included: 1. Conformance with Plans. The project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor September 5, 2007 IlMetro-inet.uslardenhi/lslP/anning\Planning Cases\2007\07-018 Arden Plaza PUD (In Review)\090507 - PC Report - Arden Plaza - Master PUD.doc Page 5 of7 to these plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. 2. Permit Timeline. The applicant shall obtain a building permit within one year of the Final PUD approval for phase one or the approval shall expire unless extended by the City Council prior to the approval's expiration date. 3. Final PUD Timeline. The applicant shall apply for a Final PUD of phase two and three within three years of the Master PUD approval or the approval shall expire unless extended by the City Council prior to the approval's expiration date. 4. Landscaping. The landscaping plan shall be fully implemented with phase one. Portions of the landscaping plan may be delayed for construction of phase two and/or three subject to City Planner approval. 5. Landscaping. The applicant shall submit a financial surety in the amount of 125 percent ofthe cost ofthe landscaping improvement for all three phases prior to the issuance of any building permits for each phase. 6. RCWD. The applicant shall obtain approval from the Rice Creek Watershed District and all other applicable permitting agencies prior to the issuance of any building permits. Copies of such permits shall be provided to the City. 7. Common Space Management. The applicant shall submit an agreement for shared management and maintenance of the parking areas, landscaping, and stormwater areas prior to executing the fmal plat. The agreement shall be subject to City Attorney approval. 8. Retaining Wall. The applicant shall replace the existing wood retaining wall with block, stone, or other similar materials that are compatible with the building materials used in the development. 9. Fencing. The fence along Lexington Avenue shall be replaced with a fence that is compatible with the building materials used in the development. 10. Sidewalk. The asphalt path along Lexington Avenue shall be replaced with a concrete sidewalk that is at least six feet in width. The sidewalk shall extend from the sidewalk at County Road E to the Lexington Avenue entrance. 11. Sidewalk. The applicant shall provide a sidewalk from the south side of building one to the main entrance on building one. 12. Sidewalk. The applicant shall provide a sidewalk from the sidewalk on County Road E closer to the entrance to building one provided the topography permits such a walkway. 13. Screening. The dumpsters and mechanical equipment shall be fully screened from public view with fencing and/or landscaping. 14. Screening. The loading dock to building two shall be fully screened with a retaining wall and vegetation from the full length of the Lexington Avenue entrance. 15. Building Design. The applicant shall provide windows and awnings or window-like coverings and awnings along the south and west fayades of building one to enhance the visual integration with building two and the retail strip mall. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor September 5,2007 \\Metro-inet.uslardenhi/lslPlanningIPlanning Cases\2007\07-018 Arden Plaza PUD (In Review)\090507 - PC Report - Arden Plaza - Master PUD.doc Page 6 of7 16. Engineer Review. Final grading, drainage, and utility plans shall be subject to approval by the Public Works Director and City Engineer prior to the issuance of any building permits. 17. General Regulation Conformance. The applicant shall conform to all other City regulations. 18. Development Agreement. A developer's agreement shall be prepared by the City Attorney and subject to City Council approval. Proposed Motion Lanl!ual!e The applicant is in the process of requesting additional traffic information; therefore, this application should be tabled to the October 3,2007, meeting. The applicant is aware that the application will be tabled. Motion to table Planning Case 07-018 for the redevelopment of Arden Plaza to the October 3, 2007, Planning Commission meeting. Deadline for Al!encv Actions The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on July 23, 2007. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must act on this request by September 20, 2007 (60 days), unless the city provides the petitioner with written reasons for and additional 60 day review period. The City may, with the consent of the applicant, extend the review period beyond the initial 120 days. The City will provide the applicant with a letter that extends the review period to November 19, 2007. Extending beyond this date will require consent from the applicant. Attachments 3E-I Letter from Applicant and Response to Proposed Conditions 3E-2 Revised Site Plans 3E-3 Revised Sheets A3.l and A3.4 3E-4 Potential Alternative Site Plan 3E-5 Public Comments/Letters City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor September 5, 2007 \\Metro-inet.uslardenhills\PlanninglPlanning Cases\2007\07-018 Arden Plaza PUD (In Review)\090507 - PC Report ~ Arden Plaza - Master PUD.doc Page 7 of7 Attachment 3E-l Letter from Applicant and Response to Proposed Conditions ~ ~HiLLS September 5, 2007, Planning Commission Meeting <>~ [Q)~~~Q@ ~0 properties 752 Stillwater Road Mahtomedi, MN 55115 Voice 651 247 7007 Fax 651 631 1500 dennis@dennisproperties.com www.dennisorooerties.com August 27, 2007 Via Hand Deliverv James Lelmhoff City Planner City of Arden Hills 1245 West Highway 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112 Re: Arden Plaza PUD Application Dear Mr. Lehnhoff: Thank you for meeting with the Walgreens developers and me last week to discuss the project. 1 thought it would be helpful to summarize the actions taken in response to your recommended conditions. Therefore, I am enclosing a document which includes your recommended conditions and the applicant's response to those conditions, along with revised plans incorporating the responses. In addition, I am enclosing a revised site plan for discussion purposes with the Planning Commission. This revised site plan contemplates a potential Garden Center for Frattalones Ace Hardware and includes a more generic building pad for the east central building as distinguished from an Aldi footprint. We are not pursuing Aldi at this time, and instead are focusing on a Trader Joes, a bank, and other potential tenants. I want to emphasize that we are not formally changing our application at this time, especially with respect to the Garden Center because we have not made a formal deal with Frattalones for a Garden Center. However, we do want input from the Planning Commission on these potential changes to a Garden Center and a more generic building pad for the east central building. 1 ,;) We also hope to have preliminary results of the additional traffic information by mid next week. We look forward to continued discussion on this project at the September 5,2007 Planning Commission meeting. We understand no formal action or recommendation will be made by the Planning Commission at that meeting. Very truly yours, f)CnKWiCn -- cc: Steve \Vcllington 2 , 1. Conformance with Plans. The project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. RESPONSE: Agreed 2. Permit Timeline. The applicant shall obtain a building permit within one year of the Final PUD approval for phase one or the approval shall expire unless extended by the City Council prior to the approval's expiration date. RESPONSE: Agreed 3. Final PUD Timeline. The applicant shall apply for a Final PUD of phase two and three within three years of the Master PUD approval or the approval shall expire unless extended by the City Council prior to the approval's expiration date. RESPONSE: Agreed 4. Landscaping. The landscaping plan shall be fully implemented with phase one. Portions of the landscaping plan may be delayed for construction of phase two and/or three subject to City Planner approval. RESPONSE: Agreed 5. Landscaping. The applicant shall submit a financial surety in the amount of 125 percent of the cost of the landscaping improvement for all three phases prior to the issuance of any building permits for each phase. RESPONSE: Agreed 6. RCWD. The applicant shall obtain approval from the Rice Creek Watershed District and all other applicable permitting agencies prior to the issuance of any building permits. Copies of such permits shall be provided to the City. RESPONSE: Agreed. Please be advised that, at the request of RCWD, we are undertaking a relatively expensive study of the existing pond and area wide storm water system in order to give the watershed district the base line information that it desires, even though Arden Plaza is only one of several sources of storm water into the pond. 7. Common Space Management. The applicant shall submit an agreement for shared management and maintenance of the parking areas, landscaping, and stormwater areas prior to executing the final plat. The agreement shall be subject to City Attorney approval. I f RESPONSE: Agreed 8. Retaining Wall. The applicant shall replace the existing wood retaining wall with block, stone, or other similar materials that are compatible with the building materials used in the development. ' RESPONSE: Agreed. 9. Fencing. The fence along Lexington Avenue shall be replaced with a fence that is compatible with the building materials used in the development. RESPONSE: Agreed 10. Sidewalk. The asphalt path along Lexington Avenue shall be replaced with a concrete sidewalk that is at least six feet in width. The sidewalk shall extend from the sidewalk at County Road E to the Lexington Avenue entrance. RESPONSE: Agreed 11. Sidewalk. The applicant shall provide a sidewalk from the south side of building one to the main entrance on building one. RESPONSE: Agreed. Specifically, there is a sidewalk along the east side of building one ("A") from the main entrance to the south side, and we have relocated the sidewalk from Building A to Building B by moving it to the east so that the east sidewalk for Building A connects more directly to the sidewalk for Building B. 12. Sidewalk. The applicant shall provide a sidewalk from the sidewalk on County Road E closer to the entrance to building one provided the topography permits such a walkway. RESPONSE: The topography does not permit this sidewalk. In addition, we are intentionally directing pedestrian traffic to the landscaped plaza area that is just west of the Walgreens building. 13. Screening. The dumpsters and mechanical equipment shall be fully screened from public view with fencing and/or landscaping. RESPONSE: Walgreens has agreed to this. With respect to the screening of dumpsters, Walgreens has agreed to use the san1e brick for this screening as the brick used on the exterior of the Walgreens building. In addition, the gates will be metal, not wood, and painted to match the brick color. 14. Screening. The loading dock to building two shall be fully screened with a retaining wall and vegetation from the full length of the Lexington Avenue entrance. 2 RESPONSE: Agreed, assuming the loading dock remains in that location. Currently, we are not pursuing Aldi as a tenant, so this building layout may change. 15. Building Design. The applicant shall provide windows and awriings or window-like coverings and awnings along the south and west fayades of building one to enhance the visual integration with building two and the retail strip mall. RESPONSE: Agreed, and it is important to note these features of the current Walgreens plan: a. Four new spandrel glass areas have been added, two on the south elevation and two on the west elevation. The spandrel glass areas will not have "signage" in them. b. Awnings have been added to all of the new spandrel glass areas. c. Man doors, overhead doors, and trash enclosure gates will be painted to match adjacent brick. d. The Walgreens wall sign was eliminated from the South Elevation. e. The size of the Walgreens script signs on the North and East elevations have been reduced by 10%. f. The size of the Walgreens script sign on the West elevation has been reduced by 25%. g. The proposed LED reader board sign has been changed to manually changeable copy. h. The exterior of the Walgreens building is masonry construction, with no EIFS. i. Pilasters have been used on all elevations to add detail to the walls. j. The Walgreens architecture has been integrated with the existing retail center through the use of matching brick on pilasters, red medallions, and red flashing. 16. Engineer Review. Final grading, drainage, and utility plans shall be subject to approval by the Public Warks Director and City Engineer prior to the issuance of any building permits. RESPONSE: Agreed 17. General Regulation Conformance. The applicant shall conform to all other City regulations. 3 ~ RESPONSE: Agreed 18. Development Agreement. A developer's agreement shall be prepared by the City Attorney and subject to City Council approval. RESPONSE: Agreed 4 Attachment 3E-2 Revised Site Plans ~ ~HILLS September 5, 2007, Planning Commission Meeting ARDEN PLAZA ARDEN HillS, MN SHEET INDEX PROJECT PARTICIPANTS OWNER ARDEN FLAZA, LLC CIO DENNI5 PROPERTIE5 SUITE 1550 4255 WHITE 6EAR FARKWAY vADNAI5 HEIGHT5, MN 55110 ARCHITECT FOPE A55OCIATE5 INC. 1255 ENERGY FARK DR, 5T. FAUL, MN 55106 CONTACT, GONZALO vlLLARE5 (651) 16S-161S (651) 642-1101 (FAX) gvlllaree"popearch.com CML 5CHOELL MADSON 15050 23RD AvE N. FL YMOUTH, MN 55441 CONTACT, FAUL D. 5CHROEDER (163) 146-1600 (163) 146-16SS (FAX) LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DAMON FAR6ER A55OCIATE5 S23 NICOLLET MALL MINNEAFOLI5, MN 554e12 CONTACT, TOM WHITLOCK (612) 332-1522 (612) 332-1?Y:l36 (FAX) twhltlock"damOllfarber .com Sz Sz 0" 00 TITLE SHEET 5!~ ~!~ AD.G TITLE SHEET . . CML AND SURVEY (OWNER'S CONSULTANT) 1 SURVEY . . C1 PRELIMINARY PLAT . . C2 GRADING PLAN . . C3 UTILITY PLAN . . C4 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PlAN . . .. C5 CIVIL DETAILS . . C6 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN . . C7 LIGHTING PLAN . . ARCHITECTURAL A1.1 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PlAN . . A3.1 BUILDING ~Aw ELEVATIONS -,---- . . . A3.2 BUILDING "6" ELEVATIONS . . . A3.3 BUILDING "G" ELEVATIONS .. . . A3.4 SIGNAGE . . _0_-- LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL L100 LANDSCAPE PLAN . . L200 LANDSCAPE NOTES AND DETAILS . . .-.. -_.- ..-- VICINITY MAP POPE ASSOCIATES INC 1255 ENERGY PARK DRIVE Sr. PAUL, MN 55108-5118 PH. (651) 642-9200 FAX (651) 642-1101 o~ IQ)~NN~~ ~0 properties ARDEN PLAZA ARDEN HILLS, MN CITY SUBMITTAL TITLE SHEET Issues ~Qd Revisil.lllS' CITY SUBMITTAL 07/02107 CITY SUBM ITT AL 06/20/07 I f.lt!l) (tIlil,IMl Ih;splnn.l,etili~li(l1.C'f :~:~i~p~~oi:~li!::1 a:~IL~~~:~e[1 !.alil,d lIIIilerl,! 111I5 ,I 10\!.1 ~lnll/l,l, 1",1.l'>). li,_IIo. 1~1 16226.07012 KH RP COOlIlissionllo, Dr~1/Il OJ Ch1CkeOOY SHEET AO.O j ~;:{SO~ON -~OO/~:;., ~=>O&...-" / .r;t;:::l ", 1~""J~'f,'i;''f'''~;H~IJV{lm;i'''-'''' /O+~. '\ ,F', / 1",.,1 ' ~ + 'l _ \ ~-----"'o ~ _______- "_ci~ ~ ~.r= " ..-. ., "__,,.%\. ---:: ~.l' ______ __________ .~--:::;:::::::::...... ~ ~.,~ / . "/'>::,1\~ _ ~---::.:::-- ~. ~ ~ ------\-,,=0:----- ~4 3t;~ I '):( "/';f'- -::::::==--;:;~ -/ \1-,.; , ", 1;{"AS ~ ~~ '\ . V ~r.-:' -Ii' '--~a'~"'\~-:-: i . " \ , \ . 0'~~lr /(j(f;;fJlf~:.'f));' ' " /. J / ,,",,~. '~il{K, ,\'o,;'/I/'/,, :' '. ,/ ~ ,/,/ ~..,l . - ~ III I ' ;;/ ~ I~~ :::~t: J,,)~Ji,,'J ~;~ o"'? ~~ ~~_____/ ~-~.. _1~'_1 ~a~I\I,'\1 {:' 680 ~~~ ~ ---- ~:/tY :::;il~'!r~::' r;;illl')\;; ~li 8~ ; ,f~== _...."::::. @ ,___I 'J~:!..;dJ-"; . /-', , r(,/;I~"--- -i" ........ 1'- -0 '" ~~:" III ,,/ " ~ fir ~ ~~~~;,~":-T"i'.':.~3f~~-'/ "-'. ,;~1111 .;.= ~................ ';~: \ ,~!.G'J.~~=,,' ;' ,.' ,_ ~ - / '- i!!i/ \ ~ I\f:g-..:~~ ~;>--:C:/J> -~'A'O--::'"~~~"<il{ ;;;:- -- ~_____ 4 . ,g \ . 'O.. / ....', "" ~,v'...... 1 I / '" , , (' ~~ . --, -,.. " 'I f w, ................... I'fl "I ~~ \ J' 't" ........ , ""...... \:1 I(/~;(" ........ ................ 50 --, \'" .........~ ,t:;a;~ ~.--- ....---- 19 ,', " i '1 t ~ A ' ~' ~, ~I" ~=:J 19 .......-: -+ ,.1., i ~,r~1 rfr[,~~;,,:;. cJ J:: ~r-f' >~ . . I ~ @ I-@' .j I ., f"""- - ~~ ~ ___I i{1 K ~I ,I{I" . I . ~ ~@ @ . --;: I ~, I @! @I ~ I ---, ........ 1 ' , -'/ ----." / ~ ~~ ~ ~1\~ ~i ~ D,~-~/q.,' ?/!ir'j':"..' /i J;~:~ .'. ",:.=1~~t:;'j)~? P.':'~J:, Id b, \ fill ~ I . ~,~ ; .....,.--.i- -;- / " .1j '\.. {'/' , "'" . ~~ / lltu:\ ~\ ,--' , ' "'~.,;~<..~~>.~:;._:~;f-. ~~ _ {i~~. ~\~ ~ ~ '1 ~~ : hP : :-'\,') L ~"o U 1\ . . ~~I ) "", I ,,- ~~~.~~ , 1, ,II' ~ "'l< .. ~ _'1' J ~ ~ ~ .. i ~ y'---- ~ 1J"~~ G~--- ~:;!:~-' . )~~\~I ~ \ ~"') ,,' ~'~,\ \ \ ,1 r,-." ~ ~ "0>",,,,,'" '[\n ~IIIIIJl; . ~ ___/'i ",:: ~~ ~~B; ; .. .~~ .-.' "~I . " 'j1nN3^V -, ~ 15: ~~? -t.. Q~6 ... <;.~. O"'q tC ~:iS.;o 710 IN ~ V,) 3t'J. S) ;0;"3_ ~~ ~ f-- = ~ ~<~q._~ ~* .!. / . '> ;" ~ '! ~~\:; 'j ,,"j -! w ,\ ( :;. ~J :>. ~' :::> I ~Si! ' lfl.Nio. ,,"'Jo..o:::g i~\. Ii ,~.~ ~ [i~! o-,'j, \ ~ II -_.: : If "-' la 0::1(,) <r: .,~ t=l" Z I ,', :::>0 " \"~l~~ ~ :if~ '" ~ .j! ;; .... "{'j""'1 "j'" :;S ( .;1'---:": ;:0 o~ ~ ~ is ~i ~: ,~. '/ --~ :~'s--L ~ ~ ::; -' '" "" ~ it-.. U >-l ::r:: ~ <r: , , :': ,"/ .......'../ /,;; '"', . " !<,..', I'.J' b<':l~ / // ~ Y ",' <'"'l-..;': D ~"~"L ,~~, '_ ,)iK",./ ..-:/ '/',' ~ ;~~o" ;; '~\ gg~~ ~o/ // v ~ _____ ~. ~~"'b ;;;: ~ 0\ ,. .~ !~'" ;/) / /:Y ;(- .;6-' _:, ~g ;.~~, D'v fj v - I' m~:'(i/~:~:~) ',..~-::~~ ,~~ '7'7':p' 1}1& :';', .~ Ie .- h"" . /' \,~~ ~~)i ? ~~ ..~.. .-o~ 'I ~o~1;. If ,D',\" , ~ . i: ' ; <In r ',~~ ,(i~. \ ~~_ ,'" \" Jt . ,'"'-~ 1(:;, ,\i, .-t-- I ;J :<..,-:::-------- E/ il/;G' ~ ,; Wf,;g 1/' ...... ~ 1"; ./ J ' . 2:"~~~11 . II ,: ~; ~~:' 1" I 'J '"'~. @ ~1" ~ ~ ~"'T ,I\i ~. ~ ._~ :1' d ,,~/" I ;\.~'il ~..... "%~i1- ".1, ~ g:~; ['>'" ;z=> '-" '" ,. /.: ..~} ~I: : J;: - J;: ~ ~ I .' '- 'I ~ ,"''''''~ ."L'" ':~~ -.~;~.\~;:i:\{~~j~~_,:-i'~. ,.:. ,'09 ~,'9l v, '0'0(,1<' , :.J.;.o.'!Y.:l', ".', , , , ';-q- , , , ,7 ~!~ 5"'>- ~ga "-, ~:;j:: ~~~ ,.k ~-OOL, ,I,,' ,e_" . .,0111:>." ..-__,1,;"~;~:t . .' ciJl/il1~' 0 ,,~ '~ ~\ ~ -----------..,,9.~-.)::-:~ e ~ ~~..~~ - <>;, -- .~""". -~-- , " ''''"0' , -"':,. ------- _____= i-;;;".' c+ _.,.___________-': ~ i"/ ~ ~ 9,'9.. ~ 3,., , m D Z ~ 8 1"" [1\, \ ( .-r. ~ ~:~ ~, 'I , ~...j z r~~ B~ ,..(.', .~'. ~ 0<;-0', -----= -~ = :l~[]SQ"OH:l tl5Vil ----=::::=d" - " "" +": , , f It r , , " ~ ::--- ~ " i '" ------~ " ("t~, - -0'.",,,) ,,9',,'6" ~'''''G C~<;\: "~60,,,', 0"",'.)0 ,'u'" ''''~~'ooS ",... ""v "",,,,,,oOc ~" '00' 'L~"""" "u ""r_ i r..... 'HOUynllO.H'>llNnfQIClS ~''9'>6_'''ij~~ ~-'.~ HI' "'.\Q"~,-m =~,.):! " " J~ ."i;,~ ; , \ . '" " . :<~ i"-{'5:"~%,,, ""~ \ ! 9"!K6~""~ :;j ~:i s:l :_--'-----_:...~- ---r ZH;t6~"1lJ ro @ e ---- Co;" ",..:.-; g~:~~ ~ ~~~~~ " Ir........'" 0"'"..,.", "" ~~~~..., '0 -.....: " , neZ, ~~L-i --- ---- / \ \... o /' ~I ~ ','~' -;1 ~ ~.., U,.lCO.S......\:;HI;03"'13 ~ .. \! ~8 './ , ........ , , - - --' - - - - - ~I- ,( -,~s -'0 ,/1 :!~ :;HJ. ,'.) z/l :; ]"1 !Q ,"11 :.\_' , , , -~ ;;: ..;..; . .: ~ "--"--;;:;;:,''> g-.. 1 a> g-gg-g-:6 ~ ~~~:;:..; :, g~g-:~ ~..., I., ~ ~ ~ I : ~ " '.0 " " :. 'g 1 g : ~::=;. I n.,,, I 00_... I ~:ii: ..0 ~ "", 1 ., !II~il wOJua:lr . , ~ . ~o 8 g 0' ~2 x, :!i ~ ~ i '0 . ; .. ",g ~ !i J . ~ !l ~ <5,.: .l! :~ ~ is "'c ~ ~~ H! ~~ <, ,. o' H ., " ~~ ~} ..;~ . ! i : . ~! ii: -, ~! .::"- " 0. ! ! i~ ii ii~ ..:1.:: ." .. ."l ~; -;: ;i l - . "' '0 ~! i~ ~~ ii .. f"i " " ~~ ~-q , , ~l ~f ;~~~ ft~~j~~ ~i~i-; .&H3~nt~Jii][i~ , ~ : i" : ~ ~ ~ . ~~ W . i3 ~ -< o::l"" .. ~!i ~~ '6 ~ ~ 8- ~.m.~~"o ~O_>: -=_- ~.li ~~~:;:"~,;: 1;; .. lj.,j!- '" :" il il... V; ~ ~ ~ ii~ fjJjiiiffj j ~ ~o~ o~o~~~_~~.. o QO .oOQOOoo.... lll~!l!lll!ll 00 I I ~@iHHHhDD ~ ! . ~j-;~ ~~ ~ -~~~~j~t gg ~!ilj~~~~!~!~i~ <a~;!3~<ii~.:!~5G~~~ ].E.E!.E";.!.!.!.!!.E!.!.a c ~~~~~~isi~i~~~~ z cccococcoCCoooo W CI w ~ ~~0e@o@.o~~1~"X~o0yg ~ " , ~5:.S-; ~ ~5E"~ :f !~;~ ~ ]~g.~ '0 ~~~:.S ,,3: 0_ :~]; 0 i!i~ ~ ]~~1i " ~~:~ ~ z: :g3::; o o",-~-;:; " ~ j~;_l; ~ 0::: ~<>" ~f:::':=';U: w ~....":.ti ~ ~~1;a : -<( z,g:: ~ "" S~d~ ...Jt-",:;:eo OJ ';16 . " ~~; ..0 i~~ ~g~ ,. c ~ t~3 ~ e~~ o "'-"e e o~ ~ wgl;<> !l:::LO>- .;( D_ D 5 2~.g, tn ':='~i: i ~ i N I~~ -00- - -o~D ..s ~~~ <> t,~ ~ ., ~ D '6 f ii~.i< " 0 .1m. mu :: ~.e~1l; " o <>""c ~ ~ ~ ~~ ij~~ ~ :2..-5v:2 ....<>LCL w 1:t1:~Z w E.SE"E g: ~..s~~~ i5 " I c, 0, "' 00' "" 0 , 0 " " ~.!!~. ;; -ot; g r~ ~::;:: Q~Q ~:J,~ , " ~ 1 _ ! 1 '" 31 w }o " , , , . ~8~~~~ ~ " CI ~ ~ ...i>-z - WS:::;; ~ >:.: - D WCl.w - 0",:.: W<l:<l: cj "'w-' z "''''''' ::; -'w<l: x :::!..-w ~ I-", zIw ~ UJS:f-- 0"'- ",,,,I <l:~S: o o , m v ~ v m m m m o z ~ u w <3 ~ n. '" o o ill ::i on ~ ~ ~Z<C -,:::>f-- -00 IO'" Z",W WUJZ O",Z "'::;;i <l:<l: '" -' 0- <c .-. Im~ ~1~J '0:::50 =E~~ ~.,:2 u1::"c'" :'::51!~ i~~; ~[E'" --",<>"" _L.2 0 ;- 0 " I as ?;; ~ fli . I 0 g-~..., ... . . ~ 8 '! t~~ j~~ B ::;;~"- ;JOg'" s !l! il~ I ~s;! _-g ~~-6 :;;:~:3 '=~:;l i: ~,f";:: ~nl;: ~ ce o'~ cn~ '0. rno ~:i CD~ o ..ce ()'~ C/)~ ~ L I b~,~~ iti,X " If: ",,, ",;,;",:,' I ;~:-:;'r~.;~'~;-;' I I! ! I' EXlsnNG STORM WATEll UNE EASEMENT (DOC. NO. 150~46&) TO BE ABANr~r 1"- ' / " L' I,~' r I ! PROPOSED DRAINAGE &: UTIlITY EASEMENT (m'I"" , O.l~_,_,.;;;;J BUILDING SETBACK I LINE (TYP!CAL "~ n ~l II 11 ]1 -11 .1 11 " I u L~':~ BENCHMARK INFORMATION: Top nut h.)onmt east sid.. Lexington Ave. at Southwest comer of existing blliding No. 3550 EleYOtlon'" 945.65 (H.G.V.D. - 1929) ',' I 'J 11 )f i :'1 ,0 ',- r I I .' I I g I irJ ;1" )~ 1<1 r I ! , o " "' ~ ~ z. il U n n - i,l, i II i-l !:-; tl ~::"j III r I i\\ u~~ ,,~~f) RO~ ED OJtlo.dE 1,,\ . <1',' OY,^,'I"'" :: '1" Ii! II, \ i!! " I 1,1 I"~ I !i' ,I I ,! , i' II t. Ii L ii i I ) ./ COU-dTV ROAD ..~-- N89'4-1', ,E ~~;';->;;~,,:"=-~~;<:~~ R.q.W~OEOICATION:: -:'~?-"''':~::'':"~'~;2':''' 5:83-' _ ' N89"?n6-E "'" _.",~ ",B,,"4-\',6'<: ..n.7S "C.~ '" ,.c ,- 0:".,00 ,!..L ,;""',,,,o.',-,-,c-o,-, R:~ ~ :S.. -L--L !" I., "~':':-':"k'1'.,( ~c 'in,.; Om ~N e""e"""', ~J ,",~~~:~:_'.~:~~:-: " - ~~';r'{'';..,;~2~;_~o,:'r<'" . ._~~.~}t '<1-1'07"( 2:00.00 , "-'-'" c, .y""",." 'f'I!iQ~Q.ST&M'()C. S~fr~~EMENT ~ . ,,~ "'s.;~' ""9'''--* "'""" -toIa9"41'tOE- 0-;' r' i;""'~- ;;...-'-'-- I :.l~ ,.< f~l I 10 ~\ ",~'!,>--fSC Ifl -=---_ If< _,,~~,,;,'_~~ -I'; I 1 .-, l~ --0-""" <'>'l.-' 1'_ -:::: \ ~ b ... ,""",;r"",_.""" ~--l-:\.. ,-..7.', ' -'" \. ",_~><:>>""...- ----"y>-l<_. / \ OOC-~"-.""2<l ''-/'''~_.).- , ROPOSED PONDIJ.;." ,.(~! 1 ! USEMENT 'j .:.::;c:,1 ROP,bSED DRAINAGE I \ ~ ,0 'I ~ &!JTIL/T'( EASEMENT \ !l! t I I ~ C1(PICAL) \.It ~ \ ~ ~ IVAPPROXI:~~~~~-"ILx1, ~I,-r < II "I., r:! DFWETlAND 1,/ I ~ I' ~ .,' ~ I ! I I i PROPOSED PQNDING / ~I i EASEMENT ",I f \1 j;-:' "ee", t ",'j" .,~ j;,9~, ~S89'4j'W . i I / " UILDING '$ETBI<5J'< IJNE(TY'PK:~i -~::: i I I IEJ 'l_~;;;; ..--;;:;~ ~ . oo-----ot: ~.. ,'-9':'[~<:;~~~~~JJ~'{~~~:'0:~;#mt - I , I I I ;1 l '.J("'~';~ ;:,g '":,,C ,:;~,.. l'P 30':'. I I I I : I -~:-----~------"~ "T ~9Q.22 N891'16"E "'c,_~,,-,-,. , ROPOSED dRAINAGE & llTlLITY ~EMENT (TYPlCA.L) 4 1.5, 185.00 '.1;__~;;1\'~ (- < .! i' '1 ! I , I , , " '-:''k ":',''-' c:::;:::) ~~--- e~, "~. 9j SITE INFORMATlON \ \. "-- ZONINa.. 01>';'" 8-2 - GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT MIMINUM LOT SIZE = 13.000 SF MINIMUM LOT DIMENSIONS = 100' WIDE X 130' DEEP MINIMUM lANDSCAPED AREA = 257- MAXIMUM STRUCTURE COVERAGE ~ 4O~ FRDNTYARDSETBACK: 50' SIDE YARD SETBACK: 20' REAR YARD SETBACK: 20' -~ I~ [: i i: LEGALD(SSCRIPTJONo SEE eOUNDARY TOGOGfW'HY SURVEY BY SCHOrLL MADSON. DATED 2-19-07. LOT SUMMARY 8LK 1 - LOT 1: LOT AREA: 8LDGCOVERAGE: BLK 1 - LOT 2; LOT AREA: 8LOG COVERAGE: BLK 1 - LOT 3: LOT AREA: 8LDG COVERAGE: 287,693 SF (S.60Ac) 52,390 SF (10.1";) 80.229 SF (1.84 Ai:.) 14-,410 SF (18.0";) 69,520 SF (1.60Ai:.) 17.640 SF (25.4";) BLK 1 - LOT 4: LOT AREA: 8LOGCOVERAGE: 4-4.D75SF(1.01Ai:.) 14.355 SF p2.5";} 65.2DO SF (1.50 Ai:.) RIGHT-OF-WAY OEOICATION roTAl BLOCK 1 AREA: TOTAl SITE AREA: 481.517 SF (11.0S AC) 546,717 SF (12.5S AC) EASEMENT INFORMATION :; 1) 20' UTIU1Y EASEMENTS WILL BE OEDICATED OVER UTILIlY SERVlCES (STORM SEWER, SANITARY SEWER & WATERt.lAIN) FROM THE LOT THAT IS BEING SERVICED ro THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE IF THE llTlUTY LINE RUNS THROUGH AJ-l ADJACENT LOT. l' !' , " Ij !I " I-! L h:~ i ~j-" tl b j! I ROR~sb MONtr9NT ,!' , ~~h i '1\ ' Ii I II ["1 , ii !i ')ii -it ~"I ! I -I:'~L...- "'~ ,','."'" i-! ,- ; 2) THE EXISTING STORM WATER LINE EASEMENT (OOC. NO 1502466) FOR THE TRUNK STORM SEWER RUNNING THROUGH THE SITE WILL BE ABANDONED. AND A NEW UTlLm' EASEMENT WILL BE DEDICATED OVER THE MODIFIED TRUCK IJNE TO THE BENEFIT OF THE ADJACENT WEST PROPERTY OWNER. 3) A PONDING EASEMENT WILL BE DEDICATED OYER THE EXISTING POND TO THE BENEFIT OF THE PROPOSED LOTS. THE ADJACENT PROPERlY DWENERS. AND THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS. 4) A DRAINAGE & UTlUTY USEMENT WILL BE OEOICATED AROUND THE PERIMETER OF EACH LOT N3 FOllOWS. INTERIOR LOT LINES: S' ADJACENT PROPERTIES/ROW LOT UNES: 10' WZlliQ EXISTING PROPOSfI) BOUNDARY LINE LOTIJNE SEmACK LINE ------- EASEMENT LINE --wtT'_- EDGE or WETlAND T1P-OUT CURB IJNE ,,----:1-----'$-' SANITARY SEWER W! MANHOLE WAlER MAIN WI FIRE HYDRANT & AUX. VALVE GATE VALVE CATCH BASIN/STORM D----~~-:;J: SEWERflJANHOLE -W>-~* FLARED END SECT10N W! RIPRAP INLET PROTECTION ---Qi-'.-----. OVERHEAD UT1UT1ES fENCE ____ MAJOR CONTOUR IJNE ___'0' MINOR CONTOUR LINE PERCENT GRADE/DRAINAGE SLOPE EMERGENCY OVERflOW DRAINAGE RETAINING WALL SILT fENCE-BEFORE .-i~ --L-,_ -..----* ->>-<0 o __-'340--_ ~~ , ,; j, , - DDDDDDD. L' ~___J I 'I - ROCK CONSTRUCT1ON ENlRANCE CUTIER/pAVEMENTELEV. BUILDING BI1\JMINOUSPAVEMENT CONCRElEPAVEMENT ; ~C' -".;..' ..""7,00 c=:J' ~ "'___n_________.-" NORTH ~ 50' ~~o~a~ 15050 23rd Avenue North Plymoulh, Minrresota 5S447 1763-746-1600 F763-T46-1699 11110 IrtdustrialCircle NW,Su1teE BkRiver,Minnesola55330 T763-241-o108 FT63-241-8351 www.schoelfmadson.com PROJECT ARDEN PLAZA REDEVELOPMENT SOUTHWEST QUADRANT COUNTY ROAD E I LEXINGTON AVE ARDEN HILLS, MN CUENT ARDEN PLAZA. LLC 4255 WHITE BEAR PARKWAY, SUITE 1550 WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110 651.247.7007 CONSULTANTS REVISIONS -7-02-07 CItySubmltbl I IwIrebycartifythatthi.plan,apecificalion, or report was prepared by me or uOllor my dl....ct.uJl"l'Vl.lonandthatlamaduly Ueensoo ProfeMlonal EnglllMf und..,. Ihe laws of the stat. ofMlrllMsoA. DavldRoe<al DAre~ L1C.NO.: CHECKED 8Y PDS/DR DESIGNED8Y " ORAWNBY " PROJECT NO. OAlE 64~Gl 7-2-07 TTTLESHEET PRELIMINARY PLAT SliEETNUMBER C1 GRADING NOTES, 1) CONTRACTOR SHI\LL CONTACT 'GOPHER STATE ONE CAll.: AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTIUTY LOCATIONS. TWIN CmES ~ETRO AREA:: 651-454-0002 OR TOU-FREE: 1-800-252-1166. 2) CONTRACTOR SHAll FIELD VERIfY THE LOCATIONS AND ElfVATlONS OF EXISTING UTlUTlES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO START OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHAll IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY HIE PROJECT ENGINEER OF Nff DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS. 3) SUITABLE GRADING MATERIAL SHAll. CONSIST OF ALL SOIL ENCOUNTERED ON SITE Willi THE EXCEPTION OF TOPSOIL DEBRIS. ORGANIC MATERIAL AND AN'( OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIAL 4) SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHAlL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATUY AFTER EXCAVATION TO HELP OFFSET IVN STABIUTY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES. WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO (XIS1lNG PAVEMENT, THE EXCAVATION SHAlL BE 8ACKFIll..ED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNO[RI.lINING THE EXISTING PAVEMENT. s) CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALl HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL. 6) ALl EXCESS MATERIAl INCLUOING BllUMINOUS SURFACING. CONCRETE, ABANDONED UTIUTY ITEMS. AND AN'( OTHER UNUSABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 7) COMPlETlON OF SITE GRADING OPERATIONS SHALL RESULT IN ALl AREAS BEING GRADED TO 'PlAN SUBGRAOE ELEVATION'. THE FOUNDATION AND BUILDING PAD DIMENSIONS SHALL BE DElERMINED BY REFERRING TO THE ARCHITECTURAL AND/OR STRUC1URAL DRAWINGS. THE HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS AND LOCATION OF THE PARKING LOT AND DRrvEWAY AREAS SHALL BE DETERMINED IN REFERRING TO THE SITE PLo\N. THE PAVEMENT SECTION AND SUBBASE SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. 8) FINISHED GROUND ADJACENT TO PROPOSED BlIILDINGS SHALL BE SLOPED AWAY AT A MINIMUM OF 6 INCHES IN 10 FEET (S.D") FOR 1l-1E FIRST 10 FEET, EXCEPT WHERE NOTED ON PLAN. BEYOND 10 FEET. REFER TO PLo\N GRADES. 9) CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR GRADING THE FINISHED GROUND SURFACE AND CONSTRUCTING PROPOSED PAVEMENTS. SIDEWALKS. AND CURB &. GUTTER WITH SMOOTH & UNIFORM SLOPES TO PROVlDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM BlIILDINGS AND PREV'ENT PONDING IN LOWER AREAS. CONTACT ENGINEER If FIELD ADJUSTMENTS TO GRADING PlANS ARE REOUIRED. 10) INSTALL A MINIMUM Of 4 INCHES Of CLASS:; AGGREGATE eASE UNDER ALl PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER. 11) REFER TO EROSION &. SEDIMENT CONTROL PlAN AND STDRMWATER POLLUTION PRE\lENTlON PLAN (SWPPP) FOR OETAlLS ON EROSION &. SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES, INCLUDING INSTAlLATION AND MAlNTEw.NCE PROCEDURES. 1 Z) CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CIlY A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRiOR TO WORKING WITHIN THE RIGHT-Of-WAY AND DETERMINE IF CITY INSPECTION WILL BE REQUIRED. I FGFND PROPOSED EXISTING BOUNDARY LINE LOT LINE SETBACK LINE EASEMENT LINE EDGE OF WEn.AND TIP-OUT CURB LINE SANITARY SEWER W/ MANHOLE WATER MAIN WI FIRE H'l'ORANT &. AUX. VALVE GATE VALVE -I'iElL- .-~-------e ....L., _ <i'--- ~ -------0 ~- CATCH BASlN/STORM -~~~ [,.-44-::) SEWER/MANHOLE -W>-~ FLARED END SECTION ~ wi RIPRAP INLET PROTECTION OVERHEAD Ul1UTIES ---FENCE __-9W-__ -_-'~';';'-_,- MAJOR CONTOUR LINE ~3&-- -__"'m___ MINOR CONTOUR LINE PERCENT GRADE/ORAINAGE SLOPE EMERGENCY OVERFLOW DRAINAGE ':::Xc,~-C:C"o:':,.-c:-;.c:c:, RETAINING WALL SILT FENCE-BEFORE -..----<0 o .....-.CH-.- ,= .., 0000000' BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 1 ", "1. L___.J CONCRETE PAVEMENT ~ ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE ''''01.00 GUTTER/pAVEMENT REV. BUILDING c=::J t:::=J BENCHt.lARK INfORMATION: J"op nut.hydrQntsost ~4..LexIn9ton Ave. at Sa\lthwut corner of existln9 bu~dln9 Na. 3550 elevation _ 9~8S (N.G.V.D. - '929) WARNING THE CONTRACTOR SHAll. CONTACT ALL PUBUC UTlUTIES FOR LOCATIONS OF AlL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES. CONDUITS. PIPES. t.WlKOLES, VALVES. OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEfORE DIGGING. HE SHALL REPAIR OR REPlACE THE ABOVE WHEN OAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO OWNER. 'J~ -'~" '.- ~"" , - r.,',,_ ~.. ;.;~'~1 t"'- , " .,...,...,."",, " ,,/ ',-- -"'0:' 0' "_< ~,';~ a ,;..,L; : ,',,:'1"ir! -1~(>-, t' ,"/ -,. 4'0- --..'':, "'lo, ';S';_c~ '- . R.q.w;o'EOt<:;~TION ."",,,~,~"', _ "". """ ",-- c"c-< c.' "~'. "'. ~<::., '- "", -~. ~~-"~". "-f.., '--'"''-''''''. "'......... ,:::: f ~\' 'c~3:::: ~.~1 ,-"..l)'''';).WCUTol:lAAlCH' ~~N(;!lI1U"'lflOUS ....-!,-. ".:1 'I ~ l;:~~!k,pC , ~, ~ ,I",",., '., ~:. ""j)Vi\\~l;,{;;~ o?'~r \j~ : \1"" .~;:.~,,;:..2' I! I fh'>~.%:. I ;::::,;fr t?: ~~, \~: " ~:~~"' ~'~', , \ ,",. ,-:.T. 00 ,"':;-~<>Oil""1Ui.....,",,-~--r ,,~")O,. .+ !r:~ :~t j :~,:R,r€~h;..;-:::~: ': '< \ 1~~ :1l4~(t Ie;" "'t' -= ~;I~ r;I~: ;; EI", ~ li.~ !h-%., EXLSllt<G CURe '" g!-: -< l~ 'i oJ- 51OE'W.<l.X TO RB.WN \. ~~ ~i~ .iik-~ 1 me ..<~,~ 'ji};' ti'~'ll '~<;f'(; r Jr{ ~..m.. ..., '''1'':'\0 : :~4 /--- II \ ,\:i.J I \ \1 ' II I NEW CONCROE \I~I 'I ~ I 'I ~ III ~,I ';'U fl"C_ ._~o, / I\~I' Jf'~ :" ...,,-// "",[t\\\1'11ff!1 t ,~t:..\~~:, ,\\[ ~'I~ir.... ' [I I ~ !../..~ "" '1-,"" __to ~:IU '[.' I .....\.------------- ~111'1.! ~ 101 <; ...,." ='j', "~tt \'1\)1 'l ~'" J ~ 1: ,I ~<:..;i, \ \ l' n,;;., ,.,; I:: I~_~~:' ,ii;}""~"~ '" I .. i::i"I'jj;i~FL1r1"~~',;;'" ~ ,11':1,,~'... ~, "''-,'''' '""< m"'''. ;;,-: I '..,~~~ J;,l;.. ..; ;.; 1 ~"h'Z II' , I I" SA'II'Cl1T &0 W.TCIl jJ--<r Ii::; II "'....1 'EXISllNGBIl1J""NOU$ "-'f::c~';ill ""'\it ..' '~"l" ,,' "., , .~,*~4~:~~{~~!#~~~~. f I. I "''"c=)'' r_';~, ',.',", J., 1,~,1:"'-' 1=' .,t,. ,10:..,- _ _ .,_', . ' -. ~! ii" j"';'-' ,,,.~ i ,,' ...1 - ".'-< l!..../ / I 'I "j,!-' f....,. [,I", ."", . "'.' ,"" ,,",.j'j'" , , "';'r., ,.}~ ,-:.,;. :,n"'I~" i~ 'YIM'! 1\\.." Ii I !\ ...-I' '""' ~ I! Ii Ii, I' ,'-' ~.jl j Iii 'if'''' Ii! : ~i nil! 1',' OI1j ,.- . -' :~;: I ~ I' 'iAlj ~~~i L;" ....,~':;(..,>.~ .~iL~ -- 'I . ~}~;; ~otI~~SI~ = I,' ,;, "~j! tlE~ )11, !;; ,y\ Ii ';' ,'1',,1 +i~/ '"'j' ~l, < ~, j \,,1\1 \ II ,,.l,:;1'1 \;ll~- ,_ ~ - e\ I \'" " ~\'\,'''it"' :;:: "", ,It I: I! 1 " II':,:: :: ~I~ ,~< ~ IY' ,;;~,~ '. ,,'~~j:! -~" \' ~\ .I,~;~;~ _/.~,:,f6_'._:,.!, ~~'~:~.":~;' ".~(til;. ~ it ' \';\\' '::,}:jtf~'-'>.,. \\;~; h ...Iii ! ;;l~' _.J,.1':('" !~, J \1 \,:,',1"\1,,,'1, " , '"I' I '. .~", 1,: ;'",:,,; ;.10;'1 '\ pl'I" ii; "~;;jr l' ,< \F,~~.,:."!.o""',i",:,:",;',,i!::l!l,_:~" :f~~ ~(~t:1,i ,."' >.:.::::Ji-' de .. .~..., 'f' C,",1I'C8l,_C ~~."n '.""';."e,'._ U:"~,'. ~J '-I .~~~. EXIS!1NC\EJ,Ifk;ENCY ",". \\ r~.~ ... , ; I '-. \ _.,,' .1wi", \~~fit[~.~~~ \ \ \ , \'''' " NORTH ~ ,~- ...",. <";,,,:. ""~~ 50' ~~~a~ 15050 23tdAvanueNorth P1ymOl!ItI, Minnesola55447 1763-746-1600 F763-74S-1699 111101ndllstria1CircleNW,SulteE Elk River, Minnesola55330 T76H41-0108 F763-241-8351 wmt.sd1oenmadson.com PROJECT ARDEN PLAZA REDEVELOPMENT SOUTHWEST QUADRANT COUNTY ROAD E 1 LEXINGTON AVE ARDEN HILLS, MN CLIENT ARDEN PLAZA, LLC 4255 WHITE BEAR PARKWAY, SUITE 1550 WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110 651.247.7007 CONSULTANTS REVISIONS -HI2-llT City Submittal ItKI'-'br"rlifytturtthi..pllln.llp&<::ffication, lH"nport_prepare<lbymearundermy dlred.uporvllllon and that I am a duly L1"nnd ProfaNlonal Enlll""",runder tha Iawa of tile stlIta orMlnna$Q(a. DavldRoedul DATE:~L1C.NO.: CHECKED BY PDSlDR DESIGNED BY " DRAWN BY " PROJECT NO. DATE ~n' 7_2-07 TInE SHEET PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN SHEET NUMBER C2 UTIliTY CONSTRUcnON NOTES: 1) CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT 'GOPHER STATE ONE CALL' AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSfflUCTlON FOR EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS. TWIN CmES METRO AREA: 651-454-0002 OR TOLL-FREE' 1-800-252-1166. 2) PRIOR TO CONSmUCTlON, THE CONl"AACTOR SHAll FJELD VERIFY ,ILL EXISTlNG UTIUTY LOCATIONS AND INVERTS, SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN ANY DISCREPANC'l" BETWEEN PL.Al>lS AND FlELD CONDfTlONS SHAlL BE REPORTED TO THE PROJECT - ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY. 3) THE CONTRACTOR SHAll VERIN THE LOCATIONS AND ELf:VATIONS OF THE BUILDING PIPE sYSTEM PRIOR TO CONSTRUCllNG SERVICE CONNECTIONS. 4) AU lfTllITY WORK SHALL BE PERFORMm IN ACCORDANCE Wffii CITY SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHAlL COORDINATE WORK WITH ALL UllLllY COMPANIES. 5) WATERMAlN SHALL BE ClASS 52 DIP CONFORMING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF ANSIjAWWA CLS1/A21.S1 AND C1Q4/A21.4 FIITINGS SHALL BE ClASS 250 CONFORMING TO TI1E REQUIREMENTS OF NJSIjAWWA Cl10/A21.10 OR ANSIjAW'NA C153/A21.53. HYDRANTS SfW..L BE THE PACER AS MANUFACTURED BY WATEROUS CO. OR CrTY APPROVED EQUAL. GATE VALVES SHALL BE SINGLE DISC TYPE WITH RESILIENT SEAT MEET1NG THE REQUIREMENTS OF AW'NA C509. ALL PLUGS. TEES, 8ENDS NJD OTHER THRUST POINTS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH CONCRETE REACllON BACKING OR MEGA LUG. ALL WATERMAlN SHAll BE INSTAIl.EO WITH A MINIMUM OF 7.S' COVER AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH A'mIA C600 AND CONDUCTMTY PROVISIONS CONFORMING TO AN.SIjAW'NA C111/A21.11. BEFORE 8ElNG PlACED IN SERVICE, THE COMPLETED WATERMAlN SHALL BE DISINFECTED AND FLUSHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH A'mIA C651 AND ll-lE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. 6) SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE PVC SDR-26 UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. SANrTARY MANHOLES SHAll. BE 48" DIAMETER PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C478. CASTING StWl.. BE NEENAJi R-1642 WITH TYPE "S" COVER. MANHOLES SHAlL HAVE A MINI~UM OF TWO AND A MAXIMUM OF FOUR ADJUSTMENT RINGS. 7) STORId SEWER SHAI..L BE REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE OR APPROVED EOu,IL. STOR~ MANHOLES SHALL BE 48" DIi'METER PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE AND CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R-1733. CATCH BASINS SHALL BE PRECAST RElNFORCED CONCRETE: AND CIlSTlNG SHAll. BE NEENAH R-3250-B OR APPROVED EQUAL FOR CATCH BASINS IN CURB LINE AND NEENAH R-1733 WITl-I TYPE .C. GRATE OR APPROVED EQU,IL FOR 8ASINS IN THE MIDDLE OF PAVED AREAS. ALL STORM smUCTURES SHAll. BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C478 AND HAVE A MINI~UM OF 2 AND A MAXIMUM OF 4 ADJUSTMENT RINGS 8) AU PIPE CONNECTIONS TO EX1SllNG lfTllITY sTRUCTURES SHALL BE "KOR-N-SEAL. OR CITY APPROVED EQUAL FOR CONCRETE BLOCK OR BRICK STRUCTURES. CONSTRUCT AN OPENING EQUAL TO ll-lE PIPE SIZE, GROUT AROUND PIPE TO CLOSE OPENING, AND REPAIR STRUCTURE TO CITY REOUIREMENTS. ll-lE CONTRACTOR SHAll. \!ERIN THE WE OF CONNECTION WlTH CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND COORDINATE ANY NSPECTlONS NEEDED FOR CITY ACCEPTANCE. 9) CONSTRACTOR SHAlL FlElDADJUST ALL CIlSTlNGS TO MATCH FlN,IL GRADES. 10) CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING THE APPROPRVlTE SEWER, WATER. AND PLUMBING PERIdITS FROM THE cITY's BUILDING DEPARTMENT. 11) UTILITY TRENCHES SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 95" STANDARD PROCTOR MAXIMUM DRY DENSrTY (ASTM 0698.78 OR AASHTO T-99) FROM THE PIPE, ZONE TO WITHIN THREE FEET OF THE GROUND SURFACE AND 1007. STANDARD ~ROCTOR IN THE UPPER THREE FEET. OJ 12) CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOE!. TO WORKING WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. CrTY INSPECTION MAY BE REQUIR~ OURING CONSTRUCTION OF UTIlITY SERVICES TO EXISTlNG UllUT'f MAINS. ';' 13) CONTRACTOR Sl-WL INSTALL, INSPECT, MAINTAIN AND RE~OVE THE " NECESSARY SIGNAGE FOR LAI'lE CLOSURES. ALL TRAmc CONTROL DEVICES AND SIGNING SHALL CONFORM TO THE MMUTCD, INCLUDING FlElD MANU,IL FOR.; TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL ZONE lAYOUTS, DECEMBER 2001. ONE ELEvEN FOOT MINIMUM WIDTH lANE IN EACH DIRECTlON SHALL BE PROVIDED AT A4 11MES. . 14) THE EXlsnNG BITUldtNOUS PAVEMENT SHALL 8E SAWCUT IN ACCOR().oI,I,jtE WITH MN/DOT SPECIFICATIONS. BENCHMARK lNFQRt.4ATlON: Top nut hydront "list ",Id" L"'dngton A...... at SouthWa:lt comer of exi:lting bu~d;n9' No. 3550 Elevation.. 945.85 (N.G,V.D. - 1929) , / ./ COUNT --"",.".,,, "':." RC;\D , :>~;~ \ ~~,",,,,,,,,,,=,,,,,,,,...,,,,-,,cmlC R'9.W~D~Dd.,~~~<?~ ~~~T~~~::~':J; f.;~~;o" S"PlUG I . ' ~J<'''l>ilO!i6SW [NT..'SJGN I j i 4" ! I i! V :1,\\ \:1 i " II II II " il !! .L::~~"'"" n i 1 t::J!1i. i i~?" ' , r,:,:.. I" ""J,-,~..,',',' f', ';/.:- "~ "'" 'P'-r~ . &~ , ! / " " ,~-{~'"' ~ 'lI"'~9J7.10 INVB9.3~.OO ,~ I 'I ,i II II ,11 I',' I! ," II! I' II f , .. lrtH I' III! ~ i,' 'Ii'. lil;'E I. 'Iii: l II ~ Ii'" ~ ,'-' ~\~ -t, "~-.,,,,, ~ \ ,;:,.c"-"- t, ~l 11.-f:~{:'i~yi~~-;:i~~~;,,~~~1r.l~llk.' I",=['"'~'^"'~ I , ;;; 4i~, 'G~~;.f:: "~.-f'~~~,,~ ~~\~ (~ 11" I ,Iii, '~>----.. ~ If': t;i.!: i; L, il ' ;I'" ,,"" I=~" r~: )U~ r R~:JL '~G ',-~~~l~ ~17 .(if"+\f m"., PI;~li2~C~ 1.,:~S;Qf!jE I : .,~l ~ ~~11.I~936.90 ,+ --- -.-'" I . " f"" % ~. ro~, "'" 1:'.:,.. ! I , .,.""...., II (!)', '--... ~::~/>""~I~- ;...\~ 27'RCP,IIJid!!! CU'-~~~~i-~~3~~,"". '-" (I ~ '" . JW_952.13(N) 1,-0 0 --:oox "- ~ 'e. /-'!ji;v_9JU9(1\'.S} ~ l""~'. , ~/ 1'0 CSI.OH I '\" I 11 ./.~\~ F ~::~:ro ~ ",,' , " mJ /ffi "~:"ri~:,~::"ro 0' . , " "",.\" ..~~~~ ~ ~ g:,~1:Ji - ~Io- ~= Rl"~9;: 7~ .,' TIl . WAY( 6"Tff 'NV..-934..70 ~'" ...,.... ---~.... <- . I ,c, , . i''' , .~~ y/ "',' c.~ CB"H12 'lIl1"_9~5. IINVR9'~. j' J "I g :1 'i I . ~2'_Rcr> 0 o.~~...... , f' ';J":"'N~,:g',-;:--, 1~-:.:, '. ~9~~tr~!'~ ~.::. :::"~):;~~~ , '('~,/"\" .~.~, n , J~t'j:, "J"',o :".;' ,;5~, ._ j:,;,. is'.:'~. ~,. l ~j .1 II l.J ~"*,,i '"-___.:...J.,;j, ~ \e. I) t, ''''~ i (."'. ti ~. :;;: , c'>J:'",. ;1 }\'i ~"'--' '-1------, ",' I Li t1~: . FFE:940.00 ;~ 5Q'-RCPO".lO:< \ , , ,c.:, COREORlU,C(lNNEC11ON TO ExlSl1N,;ce"H ",'Ji\.,INV~9~2-60 e--<'{'~'~"'~':"'I 4!,,:'.';;:~i;t~; 'OC' ___.. ",):\'. il '. ...~;- , ';HH:H:,}H{~~' CS"filO COHSIIILlCTO\IER EXl&lllilt.,ts;ST~ Rl".og38.001 I' "c' 'NV-9.lo4.7~i I CG I' i ! -'-. -<:" "., "",. o:smNC ;H" . <;::,<: "'. d" Ol111.UPIPf;~""""'-' ..'~,=,'.!d',::"';' ~,{.,/<;,~~J",:'..~ ,~;,;:.~,:; I , , i , ! I ! ( '" ) "5: ~r " i \ '''"-- -- ,.,;~ . ,'. n fj H " ,': II H n "I t:1 H r~ U Ll n L' d ''1 1\ i i' , , i: ? f' S Ii d ~..:: .U >- !i --.:"[ !i il! iil 1:, \ I:, n; II! i'l d, Iii Ii iii !I "I I'" ,I i: Ii , i I , i Ii u, l~t ~~ H ',',.Z,.-~ Itt. :.-, h ~ --',.; ~fi; ",t I ~: l/i 11 "!' ~ "--'<"1 ! .,.:~ 2i:: ,____j:, Z Ii: '-1" ~ ~~~;.:"'" ;.~'. ' W;I !' Ii ,I: Ii , I:: ~, lliElli) PROPOSED EXISTING BOUNDARY UNE LOT LINE SEffiACK UNE EASEMENT LINE EDGE OF WERAND llP-OUT CURB UNE SANITARY s(WER w/ MANHOLE WATER MAIN wi FlRE HY'ORANT & AUX. VALVE: GATE VALVE: .i;:1'. .-~---- " --1-,_ CATCH BASIN/STORM _..i--------8:-44-:; $EWER/MANHOLE -tIi>~..g; FlARED END SECllON .~. w/ RIPRAP INLET PROTECllON OVERHEAD UllUllES ~'.-FENCE __-9.0--_ ......__,<(___ MAJOR CONTOUR UNE ---------93&____ - _. _, >1-'-- -. _ MINOR CONTOUR LINE PERCENT GRADEfDRAINAGE SLOPE EMERGENCY OVERFLOW DRAINAGE '.-J.'.~:"::'<"~~~' RETAINING WALL SILT FENCE-BEFORE -..-4 o -""" ..., 0000000- BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT I' 'I L. - CONCRETE PAVEMENT ROCK CONSTRUCllDN ENTRANCE "_.011 UNDERGROUND ROCK INFILTRATION AREA GUTTER/PAVEMENT ELEV. BUILDING c=:::J ~.. . '-':":':':1 "0:;: 9:}1-.33 'll" 932.50 932.00 3/4" TO 2" WASHED. CRUSHED ANGULAR STONE UNDERGROUND ROCK INFILTRATION AREA NoSC<lle WARNING THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT ALL PU8L1C UTlUTlES FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES, OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. HE SHALl REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONS1RUCTION AT NO COST TO OWNER- NORTH ~ 50' ~~oo~a~ 15050 23rdAvef1ue North Plymouth,Mim;esotaS5447 T763-746-1601) F763-746-1699 11110 Irlduslrial CirdeNW, Suile E Elk Rivet, Minnesota 55330 T763-241.0106 F763-241.8351 W'//W.sd\Qenmadson,com PROJECT ARDEN PLAZA REDEVELOPMENT SOUTHWEST QUADRANT COUNTY ROAD E/l.EXINGTON AVE ARDEN HillS, MN CLIENT ARDEN PLAZA, LLC 4255 WHITE BEAR PARKWAY, SUITE 1550 WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110 651.247.7007 CONSULTANTS REVlSlONS .7.{J2.{J1 City Submittal I helllbl'eertifytlllrtthispl~n. apecification, orreport_preparedbyrneorundermy dlrecteupor.-tslonsndttnrll3maduly Llconu<l Proteulonsl E"llt"-runder lh. laws of lh& Stat. ofMlnnesot:!. David Roedel DATE:_LIC.NO.: CHECKED BY POSlDR DESIGNED BY " DRAWN BY " PROJECT NO. DATE 6<154$-001 1.2.{J7 WlESHEET PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN SHEET HUMBER C3 EROSION ANO SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES, 1) CONlRACTOR SHALL CONTACT 'GOPHER STATE ONE CAll.." AT lEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR EXIST1NG UNDERGROUND UTIUTY LOCATIONS. TWIN CmES I.u::rno AREA: 651-45~-0002 OR TOLL-FHEE: 1-800-252-1166_ 2) CONlRACTOR SHALL FJELD VERIfY mE LOCATIONS AND U(VATIONS OF EXISTING UTIUTlES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FIATURES PRIOR TO START OF SITE GRADING THE CONTRACTOR SHAll t~MEDlATELY NOTIfY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPmCIES OR VARIATIONS. 3) SUBGRAOf EXCAVATiON SIiALL BE BACKFlLliD IMMEDIATElY AfTER EXCAVAllON TO HELP OFFSET #ff STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES. WHEN PlACING NEW SURFACE MATERl>IL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT. THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFlu.ED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNQERI.tINING THE EXISllHG PAVEMENT. 4) REFER TO STORMWATER POLlUTION PREVENT10N PLAN (SWPPP) FOR DETAILS ON EROSION &: SEDIMENT CONTROL PRIICTlCES. INCLUDING INSTALlATION AND MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES. ~ PROPOSfD EXISTlNG BOUNDARY LINE LOT LINE SEffiACK LINE --~~~-- -~----- EASEMENT LINE ~WEi"L- EDGE OF WETLAND TIP-OUT CURB LINE ._ ~ _ <1:>-- '" _1> SANITARY SEWER W/I.4ANHOl.( --1-1- ~ I ~ WAH~R~:TN &W~U~~EVALYE GAlE VALVE CATCH BASIN/STORM --..-----. :-..-.-.-<1<1............p SE'MOR!MANHOtE -t>t:-------<~ FLARED END SEcnON - wi RIPRAP INLET PROlECTlON -Oc;-OVERHEAOUTlUTIES -<--FENCE __-"1.010--_ -_-'}"[_____ MAJOR CONTOUR LINE _3_ -__~~r.--~ MINOR CONTOUR LINE PERCENT GRAOE/ORAINAGE SLOPE EMERGENCY OVERFLOW DRAINAGE ',:"c.:::cy.:;..:;:e,:::RETAJNINGWALL SILT FENCE-BEFORE -..- o - DElElElElElEl' I 1'1 I\AAAAAAiI BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE GUTTER/PAVEMENT ELEV. BUILDING .m~ c::::::J I>O<><X><X1 c:::::::! EROSJON CONTROL BLANKET LIMITS OF CONS1RucnON BENCHt.lARK INFQRt.lAl1ON: Top nut hydrant e<lst side Lexington Ave. ot Southwest cornel'" of eidstlng bundlng No_ 3550 Bevotlon ... 945.85 (N,C.V,O, - 1929) " " ~<;" '" i '''1' J...,w; ! "7,' " -". , /~r (:: ,1' r " <.,):., W ",,",.;::;,,':>. ~"", ~.// .:'.-.-..;,~< r:,_.--'-.,-! l "'." -'I, ('(':!>(' r' //N <J:~iitS.~"- " --,,~ <lOl~~_.:......._ ;'-'~_~'K'., ./.~ " .>'..- 0'_"'''''-'''"' "<l'E' ;::;:;<,}':e'.:-i,,~;'" -':.- -.:<~ " ~->--, ''f:~::,'-';; ~. '< =:<<- :~'~iw ,"'-,...;>...- ~.~-' '% "-".t,;, ji ...---- , ~'11 _iJ \v;~:~ ~::, .~.,. :';; I "', ,,'" " ! : ~ ; ~;;:<<'i. " " ~1'r~!E:~~' 7 I >\,""', _ L' _ v'" . 1.,,.. ~" , r: ~~.;l:."'~f~~;'. --~\-~.~ .4~-~;~A~ ~ ~~::.~~\~l~' j I ~!/' ""r\,,"-",',j, -;:'"",ro;:, ",>. ,=:= ,";';.,~.~:.- :~:; "\ ,;~ :'1 "I,,/E;:~FJ -F':;:"~ ,;':' I::; j f;:~ t ^ .,~ l~~~ ~. r \U' '.' "j" ,,' ~ ,l~~'u t'l'""~" ._,~:~~*r~rjt~t ~-.,.. <<'" '",!\:\i lit \:f1 ,. F--I:~: ~!! 'if'l. r.;~1 1'.,;;", .-, "II'i'i"P:'." ""~</~Oi l\\\i ~H~ ~ I: .""", I'" !," ""..t, :;l "Y. I .=~ ,,~, ;jll i~ /'';' il~ \i'.J..., il~ '1" : i ~:Jr! j .' , !,~ _I." 0 I ,;;Jlf", ""~Ir,z:)l ~~\~ \'\~ "';,;", ;;~;' !;: , .~" ~ ,"H' 1:ll,tr_ ,\~ ' ' j " ~ III I-~::zj '~-11\ 511 ,,,:~; 'I ' ,,; .:Ji I ..~Ji:ii J 'Pi'! ~ ::;; ~': 11;1f~~~ ~{ . f ,,".,", 1 ",", ~- '::-~~u-~lhl fit:\}, )~j "'="rnl;,j U- \1 ~~!i~:~ ',I .. "- ~ //-v. .~.! '''';;.~~;0'"-/,-:-,,~--- f~;~~f~$%?~~J*i\~~,fif'~~:~;!~;t,;:t\ '1/ "-"c=5 '"roo!'" -'1', ,T"",," , \ r =" .J,. '1__. "~'" '::;"'. . 1,' 1 \"~"'~ .~"' / r"" -c_ I \.t~., ", ]: f 'f'.j-'~~=, \ !' .,.." .>hL" ".'-"-, '\ ,p"' -," -~ ~~ -------~- Pf<(MD(INLETPROTECT\Otli (TYPIc:....) .' L ,,,ii: ~1T' ~::s:~i '-,tir~ .. ;:,... ~~ ,,,,. i ,,.~, i '! ~ . ,;: 'l~ f'~. , J~~' \\.:,;~~~i :'\~~f:: \ "\~" "".' I ;.'\'\ " < d{ \ \S\~~.,,, \ \ ':::-~-"- \ --0;<;>1<' NORTH ~ 50' ,,,:,. .,i"." '."d> ~~~a~ 15050 23rdAvenue North PtylllOuth,Minllesota55447 1763-746-1600 F763-746-169g 11110IndustriaICirdeNW.Su1teE E1XRiver,Minnesota55330 T763-241.010B F763-241.8351 WWW.schoeUmadson.com PROJECT ARDEN PLAZA REDEVELOPMENT SOUTHWEST QUADRANT COUNTY ROAD E I LEXINGTON AVE ARDEN HILLS. MN cu~ ARDEN PlAZA, lLC 4255 WHITE BEAR PARKWAY, SUITE 1550 WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110 651.247.7007 CONSULTANTS REVISIONS _1..02...01 CitySubmltla1 1 lHl....bycertifylh3tthil<plan, Bpedfi<:3tion, ornoportwas prepared by me orundermy dlrectaup&Malon and thallamaduly L1cenudProfe...ion.IElIlll"""rundvr tb<tla_oftheStataofMlnnasota. DavidR<:><tdel DATE:_L1C.NO.: CHECKED BY POSlDR DESIGNED BY " DRAWN BY " PROJECT NO. DATE 6-45-46-001 7-2...07 T111.ESHEET PRELIMINARY EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN SHEET NUMBER C4 """ R='< .;z~ .n",," be 1" 10.2" in .;,~ .uoh """',,OOTco.._' o,(:.I,-2"""=,,,,g~a~ "9<"t..Ii"".obricm"l'l>eu.ed""_\I>.."",,, IO~""'l",tionorlh<und.""<>g"",l",to "'.>to<><. ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE CurbBo. , ) -;.-;..- ---~, " Con..-.toOf Bity",inou,Ct>rI> g.7!;" TABU:OFQUAN1l1lES ~- - 1~~ ~~ ~ or_ ~m ~ ,'- .~ ,,' ,., ,. " ;~ ". ~ ~ tl .. :~ ,,' 1~; ,,' .' ~ ", ,,' '"' .' ;~ ", ". ,., ~ ~; ~1 w Hi n' .. ::: :~1 .' ~:: .u - :::;- ". L' '. <- U " ~ .. U o' ~ '. ,,' .. 1~.' U ". ;g:; ~~ ::~ :!~ ". ,,' ~ ~3 ", rr ~ ~ iN ~1 '0'. gr '0' '". ., .. ~~ ,3' L:;;' "' BWIK(T SEC. B-B ~ f_.C;;:- GRA/lUlARRL1ERBl>>IKET,~ /" _ 'Ii;; :r.....t:~~U~D~f.~~.R~ SEC. A-A RIP RAP DETAIL 223/"'Sq.~ =rut:~",_R'642. """"""...,.."""".OIl_ftO'<EO ~~~~~ i?'"~"J"'~':' .. -";'l _____________ THE ~ O,EO"OI 2~stW..l."'''''_"'' OFASI""-"L.O;[.............:....,,"" "'MrAOFImUSSllWlo.USO. ".otRrl.OFtOlHr. T, ~~A~~~"'1.,,~OH";'i~ .,....~ """'" ID """....... HI> """'" """-'.-1IE......:;rn ""''''''''''"''''F=.OF......''''''''''''''''r(R''''''' NlD"""'fAA)mMTTOUOFCISfINOMIO""''''' CO"<=noo< ;'~~~7800HC11:ffi =JOo<fl>ETM.(WI-J) -- ~...,., ,. .........,.,."""", .lW<HOU:Sn.L8EH>I>tilI>-.m<""'-'- ao>F""""'....IOO<Hft>R""". Precoot '-'onhofe Cove,Sklb :;8" 0,0. Y;~h 2' . 2' 0l""'i09 nPlCAL IWIHOLI! ". 2"0" Sq. g~ ~~ . ~'D' 4./l"RCPCl...UPloinEtt<l. P=oot"'onnole eo.., IK"O.Il.F1otlle>iqQ ~'::-:;:"""~i" ....MIio<"""""'" ,". ....... -:'-,...... ..'. ". <.. .,.'. ~" ", , '. '.' =- L....."'_'....__....._. '--......-....------ ~..ASllIC--+<3<<<-- =-~....=~:t.~~~g:m """""*""'''''' 2!X"""'-~~o~.c. ",,~5 ~3<Ol ~ -=...,- -- - "'"'''''''.,............... ,. 6".';' 'I ". I PROflI.I! IECTION A.A CATCH BASIN MANHOLE C>SIlOlG IS ~0lUI I'tER<FO!lCro(:OHC. CJ.TOtIl>.SlN,NOm>I STAA 8_18 M ~- ,,' ,. '2...... '--1 .~,~,.. "'!'.'. J" " ~Oi'l""E---CI.SY ~- DEAD END CATCH BASIN INTOGRALLYCA5T ~,~ ~,~ IofECI-WlID.LSfAL WAlER 11GHT SI!ALI STANDARD SANITARY MANHOLE "lIl'I<m<Of'>+o.J ..,..,.,,,,,,,-,-il<?L.ACnI lHROUCIi-.EPlItMDED ~CIoSfl-IQ_EIIl11JlOU1 IKt(IlHECOtiCRETE:. rGROONOSURfACE 2" 1DJu""",",IIGS ~~~~ ROlOV~LEPLuG OH SEWER PIP!: " - ........CllOi__/""- """""",--""""...,.,."" SlJ.aS1NST>UM:l"EllY....n... ~~, AC<JNCRErE""""'--ESK'il 1IE1'OI.OIOlI............t>lCce RflCS.1lf>;SIW.lNOl".H<IWE'oVl. OIN-IETllE:COIICRrn:GRoUf OCIWEEHlH(RflCS. !jB6ENDSTIINDAAOEUlOW ,. ~~ ~ TYPICAL CLEANOUT DETAL EXl5TlIo:ORPSlI)I>OSUl"""",",UIfE ~ € 10 , ._-~.............. .""""'---.........-;'" ...................;.,.- .....,.-........- ~-;"'..~.::....."""'- ~'""""~~ , , , , . . 4 S e 7 ~lW""""~l1OH '"'" SLAB TYPE Il8ULA nON DETAIL su_~cr DfmiEPOl.E.7;4" lme GROUND RECOMMENDED TOE"IN TRENCH posrsSKAlL6l:SPN:ED NO GREATER T1-Wl4'APART FABRIC 8LTATION RNCI! NOTE: WHEREco.uED FOR DN l1-!E ?l>>IS. A DROP SECT10N 3~ ~~~~ST~8'\~~~~i:o~.nb€:~ON \ 1l~,l.NCEOFnJREE(3)FEET. f '" '~" T r ..1 ~ "~ SLO?EJ/".P€RfT. w 8612 CONCRETF: WCV.'<OS FPERW ER fcu.YO. \2"0.1H74 21.1 B6111 ~~'" ERYO~'&~ ,~, CllNCRm W V.YOS f?ER l V.YD. 18"0.0582 17.2240.06'10 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER DETAILS '-l F1L1Vl ~-'<lR>C El.'.CKF1LL .....Tl\lESOIl.. '/2"~ \ TI r ,.--< 14.5 - oc__ =.i.OlIE"" HYDRANT DETAIL ~~~mU::"'"i"m...) ~. ~~~'" -- ....."....- M ~~~ _oc_ ~~ ~- II " \, \\ 1 / /I '{- /" / I ------:..::- -- -- /"/ ~--- -;::/ Curt>lino I ---- '"'- PLAN _ Ne-<ooh R J250bCurt> Inle!.frnm.. Grot.. Curt> Bo'. G"'lc2"BcIo-wMjocontG<rttecu"dS~et ....,"""".............A. rT-S$--'''''''-'-''''''''''''''' -...."'....... ~ ,--..../"".'0. , ' ~r-=-_ ..,:::::-......__.1/~-"/7:"_,... L__....._...... >+<lID RIT.......,-....u.s~cmlIHO.ur'" """'I/r_....,'_....._ ~~"'Iff.. KEY8TOIE RET~G WAU. Dl!TAIL "'lS(Rl"108EUSEDSHAl.lBEAW"..CO ~OAlJDFWN-STYLE.OR""PRO""OEOUAl.TOBE UTlUZ~D 1>1 THE EXiSllNG ROADWAY CASTING. TO BE USED IN CONJVNCTION WITH A NEENAH CASTlNGNO.R_3067TYPEDR.DL.ORTYPEV ORAPPROV[OEQUAl CATCH BASil NET PROTECTJOH ~~~l!I.a~ 15050 23rdAvoollB North Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 T763-746-1600 F763-746-1699 11110lrldusllialCirdeNW,SuiteE ElkRiver,Minnesota55330 T763-241-010a F763-241-8351 WHW.schoe~madson.com PROJECT ARDEN PLAZA REDEVELOPMENT SOUTHWEST QUADRANT COUNTY ROAD EI LEXINGTON AVE ARDEN HILLS, MN CUENT ARDEN PLAZA, LLC 4255 'NHITE BEAR PARKWAY, SUITE 1550 WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110 651.247,7007 CONSULTANTS REVISIONS -7-02-01 City Submittal I horebyoortify thotthlo plan, opocili<:ation, orreportwM prepared by n1<I o<undermy dlrecloupervlolonandthotlamaduly lIcano.-lpror.s.loneIEngllle4lrund... tho!aw. of tho StateofMlnnooota. OavldR<>&del DAn::_llC.NO.; CHECKED BY PDSJOR DESIGNED BY " DRAWN BY " PROJECT NO. -.." om 7-2-07 TITt.ESHEET CIVIL DETAILS SHEET HUMBER C5 PROJECT: ARDEN PLAZA REDEVELOPMENT LOCATION: ARDEN HILLS. J.lN OWNER/DEVELOPER: DENNIS PROPERTIES 752 STILLWATER ROAD MAHTOMEDI. MN 55115 651-247-7007 CONTRACTOR: TeA ENGINEER: SCHOEll MADSON 15050 23RD AVENUE NORTH PLYMOUTH. MN 55447 CONTACT: JARED JONES 763-746-1608 jaredj@schaellmadsan.cam 1. 0ESCRPJ10H (pwpo.. and W- of MIl ~ oetMtIM)= THIS SWPPP IS OESiG><EDTll (1)lOENTIfY.ou.l1iEPOTlJfT\O.L SOlJRCESOf POLliJJJONMifQlIJAYRWONASLYaE:EXI'oCTED1O.oI'l'EI:fSTORlolW-l.1ER OISCHARCF;SF1!OlITHESlIE:(2)OESCRI8oT1ioPAAClJC~TOBEUSrnTOREDUCE PaLI.11TANTSlNSToRI,(WA1UlDISCfWlGESFR(llolTHoSllE,:NlD(3}.osSURE C(llol~ 'IIITH THE TI'RI.lS NlD CONOffiOtIS OF ruE NPO€S PHASE: II STOR'" W"'lElI PERIoIIT. .os REOUIRtD ANO OCFINED BY1l'IE HPOES PHASo II sroRIoI W"'lER PERlIlT.THES1\?P?WIUSt'IIoIPLalENTUIAT1H(SlJEFROl.ITHECOI.lIolE}lCO,lENl OfCONSTR\JcnO/fACTMTYUNTILTHECQl,jPlfJ1ONOFf'lt.l'oLST~II,JZATION. THl:PROJECTWtUIlEI.IOl.JSHTHEE>IIS1l>1GO~COf.(PI.DAAOl1iEw.KlflIlYOF niE EX<S11NC PAAKlNC Lor. fflU CONSTRuCT 3 NEW RU....ljOFFlCE BlIlUllNGSfflD .o.ssoctATrnPAAKlNCAAEAS. THEEXISlINC STRIP lolALLWlLLREIoWIl IN PlACE. THEPROJECTSHlJ.tl'OLJ.OWlolNoorsrAlltwlDS?F.:CIf'l....l1ONSI'ORCOI<STRUCI1QN 2005 EDrTION UNlESS OTflERWlSl' NWEO. 2.. SE'lXJEHCE OF COHSTRl.ICl1ON ACTMTES: THEORIIDl Oi'AC1MTIF;SWlLLBE.os FTlI..l.-O'olS, lJINST......=(H1'R.O.NCE8[Rlol 2) INSTN.l..SlLTFalCo 3J ClDIlHl(lC/lUBSITE ~) EXCAVATlON 41: EAATH UOVING 5) TOPSOILRE5PREAD 6) STASlJZEOENUOEOAAWNlOSTOCl\PILE'$WITI1INTIIolEFlW.lEUS"TEO 7) INST......S#lITAAYSEWDl......l<RW!N.ANUSTORhl5B'I'ER B) IflST......STORIolSEWDlINLEfPROTECllON 9) INSTAl..LCUR8.l<GVTTER.SIOEWAlJ(S.fflOBmJl,I1NOUSPA'lElolENT 10) IHSPE:CTOasnIlCPONO.l< REMOVEIllffACclJl,llolUl.ATrn SEDlIolENl 11) INSPECT sm mECONl1W;TORIJAYNEElJTOAPf>i.YlDoll'DRARYlIv,sURES(SEED/tlG""0 lIU!.CIlING) WI1lJIN 200 FEET OF WATERS OFll1E STATE WlrnIN THE TIlolE PERlOOOF THE P<:RlIff ~ 7. 1~. ANO 21 OAYS. THE INOMllUAl PROPERlYOWN'Ell SIW.L8E RE5POtlSI8LE fOR lONG TO<lJ ~~~O,TIiE~~ATO<PONO 3.CONlROl.YEASl.IRES: 3.1 AAFAS Of CONCERI< "')OISCWRCETOWElv.NOS.IJ.I(ES.&STllEMIS -mE PEilIIolErol OFAU.\II'ETl>><[)S ""0 EXISTING ooOIES OF WAl'ER SHALl.. BE SURROUNOEDBYSlLTfEOCo:. B) CENEAA1lO>I0i' OUST Il\JS1 roNTROl w.y &COllE NECESSORY. WAITR 1R1JCK5 w.y 8E REQ(JES1EO If rr IS NECESWlT. C) w.c.KltIG OJIfTO PvBUC SJ"RfElS ANll COUNTY l< S1Al'ERQ.I.OS A ROCl( !;NIlW.'CE 9ERlI I<'S 8UN PR(M[)rn TO JjELP RmUCE \IEI-lICLE TWlCKlNGOFSEDllIENTS<lt/RImECOYSTREE1'S. THE ot:\'aOPERWILL INSTAU. IHlfTPROTECl1(lNONTHEEXlSllNGSTRfl;TS.osREOUE5llll6YTIiEOIY_ F}SIOCKPllf5 STOCKPIlE SWliEiESEEDEDNlO...UlOiEOWll11IN SE'IEN MYS OfACTMTY. .HsrANlWlOCOmROl.lIv,suRF;S A)'lEUPOIWlYROCI<CON'STRUCT1ONENT/WoICE ",ROCl(!;NIlW.'CEIlfllIolI5CONSTllUCTEDO,COoIRSEClEANROCl<IO<5TAl..LEDAT THE PROPOSEll EN1iW'lCE POltlT I'OR AU. CONSTRlJCJJON'lEliICUS. ADET....LOf WE ROCI(EN'I'RANCE 9ERt,l 15 SHOWN ON1HEOE1IJLS SHEE1_ THlSSTONEP.&D P'RO'IlIlES A TIRE CLEANINC MEC!W<ISM fOR ALL VEHICUS lEAVING mE SITE II)SILTFUlCE SUfENCESAAEllESIGNED~AlElIPORARYSEoIlolENTa.<RRl[RCOI<S1SflNGOfA R1.TE:R fABRICAIT.lCNED TO Sl,IPPORT POSTS. mES1LTFlllCESl-W..LIN GOlERALIIEPl.'.CUIAAOuNDmEPERlIdErER OF mE SITE OR AT '!HE ulollTS Of 1HE:I'ROPOSDlOtsruRBrnAAv,s_ REFER TO 'fl-IECRADlNG PLmfOR EXACT =~. C)FINISHEDGRAIlE5LOPES THE SIIEIS !lElNG GRAClEP AT 3:1 SLOPES WI-lEllE POSSlBU.:TO PROVIDE A LfiS E:llOSM: SURl'ACE. 3:1 SLOPES SIW.l.. BE SUOED WIfH lolNOOT MIX,so. Ntf 3:1 SLOPESO'IEll~rmINlDlGTH (UNliSSTHEY ARE lSOLATED FROll RlJNON ......lER}DR3:1SLOPE'>WlfHCONCEliTRATrnfL0W5S>tOlIUlUSEAlINOOT ....TEGORY.1EROSIONCONTROL61..'.'<KET'OSNEEDEO_ TllERESlWiBENO UNBROK0l3:1SUlf'ESGREAlERTI-Wl75FEETlNlDIGTK. O)STOR"'tw.m'NlfTPROTECllON STORlol DRAIN IfIL[f PllDTECIION ISASEOIl.IENT\WlIllERPUlCEOAAOUNDA STORt.CSEWERINlfT. THISSTRUC1l..<RE1IW'SSEDllIENTIIEFDREITENTERSTHE STORlol SEWER S'\"S1E!.I_ THE UllLllY CDmRAC'TOR W1Ll BE: REOIJIRED TO INSTAU. 11lEWI"'COsrRIJCTlJRALSTRWltlSERTS. PRIOR 10 INSTAlJ.AnON. THE ENGINEER SHOUI.D\lERlFYWlfHlHECIIY~D011lD!.oGENClESJW.1TIiEPROf>(lSEDINLEr Of:VlCEIS IN COI.lPLWlCE WIfH THEIR STNll>'.RPOETIJl5_ THE !l1oIP'S IIUSTBE INSTALlID \llffijIN 2~ HOURS Of CONNECTION fflO CAlI ONLY liE REIdO'IED DURING WIN1ERIIONlIlSAAlOONCE7ID:IlEl<SlTtPfRIJANENT'lEGETATIONISESTABUSHErI IN 1OQ:C OFll<E CON'TRlauTINGWA'iUlSHED. E}1REA1lolENIf'DNOSNlOSEOllolENTII-'SlHS SEDI1.OENT IS SCHEDULED ro BE REJOlM'D fROlol THE PROPOSED POND/a.\SIN AnER mE PLACElIENT OF mE BITIIlIINDUS WrAA COURSE. F)1'ElIPDFWrrRCiTOl>.AlION 1'ElI~SEEDlNCWlUBEOOHE/>SRiOlJIRE08'rTNENPOESPHASEIIPERlIlT ""0 mE GIWlING lIIlU BE SCHEOlJLEO 10 lI1Nl""ZE lHE 0l5ruR8ED AREA A1 ALL ml~_ II'NEC~S4RY.AU.0lST1JRBEOAAfASWlLLBERESTOREDwn>>6'0F 1'OPSClIL. TNESEEDUIXSHAI.L!JEltlllCCORCWlCE:WlTNIo!NOOTloIIX1Sll APPUEOATARAl'EOF..oUlS/.<CREfflOfERllUZEDWID1'0-10-20AT"RATE OF200LES/ACRE. ll-lEIIULCHSf').UOC....OOT'M'El""O.....PUErlATA AAl'EOF2TON5/.-.:;IlES.IJlSC.....Cl-lORED(WITHOlSCB().ilESS~NE".AALY S1RAiGEl'T) IlIIolEDIA1El.YMTER Pv<Cl'1IEN1. WOOOFlBERBLAtlKE1'.i{lolNl)()T ....lEGOflY3)WlU9EINS1Al.lm0N.1:1 SLOf'ES.os tlEEDEDNlll ON ALL OITCH OOTtOlolSGREAl'EIlTHNi2l[. I) PER!.l.<.~Em RES(oR),TION . PfRt.CnIOI1 Sl'I"E IIESTORATIOtI SI-W..L BE IN .<CCOROAl<CEWIDl 1H( Lm05CA?E PLNl,1JiO W.YItlCtIlOE SOOOlIlG 00 SEEDIII(l. J) TIlASH mil DOlRIS ALLlRASHAIIOCONSTRIJCTlOtlOC8lllSFROlIll-lESrrEWlLLOCCCUECl8>ANO llfl>OSITEI) IN A OlJ...PSlUt 1Ji0 THE OIJllPSlUl SHAUOCElolPI\ID1oS 'IECESS/IRY. NO CONSTRlJCT1ON IJATERWS SI-W..L BE BURIED llll5l1f.. AlL $OlIITN'fr SEWER WAST( WILL BE COULCTED fROM 1HE PORTABLE UN(!S .os R(QUIRED8YlDCALR(GULA'OONS. ~) OEWATERlHG OEWATEIIINIlORNlYTl'PE OFSURFAa ORAII<AllE1W.TW.Yw..~T1JIl!IlCl OR 5EDIlIEN1 UOOl OISCIJ.AAGE WAlER t.rlJST BE 0lSCHAACE:tl TO A SEoI~EN IlASIt' ON THE PIIOJEC'f SITE WHENEVER POss1SLE. FlHEWAlIR CA/iNCl'f!IE ~TO"a<sINPllIORTOENl'ERlIfGl'HESURFACEWATER.IT~USTBE rREATrnWITHmE.<PI'ROPRlAlEBlolp'SSUCHlNArTHEOtSCI-W<<;EOOESNOT ~YAFffC1T1-lERECEMNGWAl'EIlOOOOWNSTR(.o,lIlANOOWNERS.THE CONTJW:TORloIUSTO<SIJRETIiATll!SCIWlG[:POlNlSAAEAOEQUA1El.YPiIDTECTEO fROI,l EROsIW-ANO SCOUR. l'HEOISCl-WlGEI.I\JST 9EOISPERSEDCM:R ~l\IRAL=RlPIW'.smD6AGS.PlASTJCSNErnNG.OROTHERACCEPl'ED E/<ER<;YDlSSIPA110H ~EASuRB. AlL W"'1Ul Fll()f,I DEWATER1HllIoOUST BE OlsctWlGBlIN...t.WlNOl......T = tKifC>.lJSEIMSNlCECONIlITlONSOR ~". L}CONNECTIWTOSURF.lCE......TERS AU. EXPOSED SOILAAEAS WI1HIN 200 FEET OF'" SURFKE WAl'ER ORmf STORlIWAlUlCONIIEYAHllEsYSlUll'rHlCH IS CONNECl'Ul1OASURl'.lCEWATER IIUSTBESlABlLlZEPWlrnIN 7 o,o,YS (SIUl'EI\ llWI 3,1 SlOI'Ci). 14[A1..YS(10,1 T03:1SUlPES).OR210AYS{f1..ATTERllWlH):I).1NtSEAAEASINCUlOE PONDSilJ'ESLOKS.EXPOSEDSOlLAAv,sWlrnAPOSrrM:SLDPE:TOACUfl8 AII0GLmERSYSlElol.STORllSEWERINLEI.()R.l.ttW;[DITOl.OROTHERSYSlElol ......TIJlSCIl.I.RllESTO...SURFACEWA'IEll. THEllOflI,W.wETl'EPPERlllElEROF NtfORAlWCE 0f'ICH IIUST BE ST.oaIUZEO WII11IN 20Q LlNfAL FEETFROloIlHE PROPERTY EDGE, OR fROlol l'HE POINT OF OlSCHAA<;E'IO Ntf SURFACE WATE:R (WIlH1N 2~ HOURS OF CONNECTIIlG TO A SURFACE WATER). t.C)l'Eo.!POIW!YSfOCl{f'll.ES ~STOCKPILESI.IUSTHA\lESlLTffNCENlOUNOl'HEPERlIolEIEROFmE BASEOFmESTOCKI'ILEAIIOCAllNOTOCrv=INSURfACEWATDlS.IlICLI.IOlNIl STORIoOWAlERCO!i\lEYANCESSUCH.osCUR8A110llllITERS'I'S1Dl5.ORCOtllJUlIS OROlTCHES 4. one POTEN1W.. STORW WATER POl..llfT.lrHTS POTEl'flW. P()l.LUTNofT SOURCf.:S.ltICllIOING CONSl1lUCTION ""0 WASTE IJATERWS mil AIlE USED OR SfORErI...TTHESlTEAAE OESCRlOCO IN THE sa:ooN_ IIY ""f>LEI,IENIAlIONOF'fl-IESEBIolPS.THEf>OTCNTW.POWJTNofTSOIJRClOSAAEtKif ~YD:PECTED'IO~nioSTOOIoIWATERIlISC!WlCF;SFROIolll<ESI1t. COtlsmucnON lMlERlAl5. CHElIICAl.SNlO WASTE 1JA'IERW5TW.TW1l.L BE lISED OR STOREOATlHEsm: ""Tnm" """"UN'r '-"'-' """"" r.t'>NTr>Ol ""A~"R~ _=c = 'AA~ SECOIIOAAYOONTAlI<lIENT -~, = ,~, SECONONIYCONT....NIolENT PlESElRJEL = 'AA~ SECOll[I,AI{YCONTAlmIENT -~ = IN'lOSCAl'E SECONo.oJrrCONT....IIlIENT -"' = INEQlJIPl,IENT SECOtltlAAYOONTAlNIoIEN1 GLIJt'/AOHESNES = ~" COIfTIlH:TO!lIlESPONSlBLE H"t'IlRAUiJCOlljFlUIOS = ~" SEGOtlIWtrCONT....I<lIENT eN~ = CONTRAC'lOR CON'IIlo'CfORflESl'ON51!ILE ,,~ = ,~, SECllMWlYCONT....NI,lENT $OlIITAAYWAS1E = VAAIOUS SElMCEPROVlOEllTOSEClJRE lJNrrsFROlolTIPPINGCM:R SOIL MlENI)I,lEWS "' CON1RACTORRESPONSlBlE W<llSCN'IO/GIJATERW.S = IN'lOSCAl'E S. EROSION CONTROL lHSPECTION NIl) w.NTElWICE: S.IEllOS1OfoICONTRoL'NSPECllOl< INSf'tC11ONS"'UINOlJllEAVlSU.>.LltISl'ECTlONOFAlLOISTUR8EDAIlEJSOFTHE SI1E. MA'IERW. STORAGE AAEAS EXf'(lSED TO P!l€CIPITATION. SEllIll8'l'T1JiO EROSION CONTROLlIEASURES.UlC'.TIOllSWHEJ<<:VEHlCl.ESOf1EROREXiT'I>lE COHSTRuCTlON SIft. .....0 ...::cf;SS18LE lJjSCfW\llf: POltm (our FJUS). mE PURPOSE Of 'fl-IE IfISl'ECT1Olo1S IS TO ASSESs NlO DElER~INE WHElllEfl EROSIONCOH1!lOLlIEASlIflESAAEOPERAl1NGPROPER\.YNlOEFFB:TMLY. IN5PECTIONR&offiSWILl8ECOr.IPlEItOAYniETIIolEOFlHEINSPECTIQNANtl CERnflEDASREOUIREDIIYT11EAPPl.IC'&.ERPOES~IIS1ORlI""'lERf'tRlIrr. mE COtfTtN1 OF mE INSPECl10N flEJ>ORT5 WlLLAOORl'SS'lllEREOlIlRED CONTENT RlR THE IIlSP[cTIOIoI REPOIlTS PROVIDED BY TIiE HPOES Pli>SE ~ SfORlol WA'IEl PERloIrr. THEINSPECTJONREI'OffTWlLLIHOICATEMfEfI1ER.omINClPENlSOF NOtl_COr.I~CEwrm1HEREQUIRE\ltNTSOfmENPOESPK'SE.STOfU,l"""TO< PER",rr_OBSERVEDNlO~COHDmONSR(OUIAINGNl""ENO!.IEH1mT1lE -~. 1U INSf'ECllON AND IHSPECT10N REPORIS ArmIS SITE WIll. BE COIoIPLEIEO BYA REPRESEmATh'EfR()lImECOIl1R>.C1OR'SFlR!oI. lNSPECTIONJJil)loWNJUWoICERECc>ROSS1'AU..SPEClfYT1IEF()l.LOWJHG: 1.DATE~OTIIoOEOF~SPECllON. 2.NAlIEOF?ERSOH(S)CONllUCIlHGlNSPECI1QHS. 3. DAlE .....0 A/,lQIJNT OF RAlHFAlL fOR EVEH1S GflE,\l'ER THAN 0.5 IH/2~ HR. .ou.INSI't'CTORS"'LLBEFNoIII.L\RWrTHAU.ASl'ECTSaF11<IS_PINCLUOI><G 'fl-IEI"",LElIENTEOB'W'S""OW1LLCOIoIPl.UERECULARINSPECTlONSOFTHEsrrE. llOCU"EN1ATIOfolOfntEEXPERJ€NCENlO~'OONSOFPERSONNaIoW<ING INSPECTIONS ATTHI5 SITE ARE I<Cl.UOED IN THIS SOCTlON OFTHE-SWPPP. INSPECTlOfoIS WtU!IE COIolPlEltO ACCORDING TO lHE SCNEDULE BELOW. L EVERY 7 DAYS 2.WlTHIHUHOURSOF'lHEENOOFEACHIWNEVEH10F0.5"ORlMlRE 3_WHENt."Of5H(ffillEHllCCURS 5.2 EROSKlfoI""O SEDlr.<EH1CON1TlOl.WJtlTE>V.NCE I)Al..LEIlOSION.l<SEDllIENTCOIIlllCt-lIEASURl:S5Ho'U!lEWJNTAlNEDINGOOO WOfll(I><GOROER. NECES5AIfYWlNTEH.ANCEANUREPIJRSW1UBEINIT'.\TrnWITHI"A 24 HOUR PEROO OFTIiEr.<AIN1<JW.ICE""IlINSPEC1JONREPORT. ARECOROOF Al..LRa'1<RS5W.LlBEl.WlEWlfHINTHE:REI'ORT. 2)EXPOSUlEXCAVATIOIoI~S1'AU..BEKE?TTOAIIIHllIlIr.<BYIlAI..I.'IClIlGCur /<HOFlUAAEASmRO\JGliOI1F'!HEGIWlIOOOPERllnoNIN.lCCORIlANCE WITH THE""'PIlOYEDGIWlINllPlAN. 3)SIl.TffNCEWlLLBEI"SPECTEDF'tlR0CPTI<0FSED""ENT!lUUl-uP. SEDlI.((H1 SIW.t BE RElIcJVED FROlI1U SILl fENCE WHEN rrHAS REACHEDOHE-THIRD OF 'fl-IEFtNCtHEIllHT. ~)SILTFENCEWlUBEINSPECTEDf'l)RltARS_ SllT~SIW.l1<.Sl7BE <NSPECITDTll EHSURE'1HE fABRIC IS SEclJRaYAIT.oo<ED TOmE F(NCE POSTs ANDIfTIiEJUofCEPOSTSAREARloOlYINTHECROUNO. 5) STOCKPlLESWlU-BE INSPoC'IID FOR SILT FnlCEOROntER SEDlt.CEH1 CONfR()LS.mOCANtIOT!lEPlJ,CED IN Sl.JRfAC€.....TERS. INa.UOlNG STORII WATER CO~ANCE:S SlJCH .os CURB /<HO Gl.ITI!R =or.>. OR COHOUIIS 1Jill OlTCHES. 5) STORlI WATER mEA'IJ.lENT PONDS WlU !IE lIOHrrOREO f'l)R 0CPTl< OF SEOlllrnT. SEDlII0lTW.YItA'lEl17BER(I.IcJVEDMiENOESlC>lC#'ACITfH.lS8EE11REDOCa> IlYSO:l:ORlIORE.1JiOWITllIN72IK1I1R5llf"OISC()',I[RY. SEDllolElfTIJAY.olS(l K>.vEroOCROtCM:O...TTHEENOOFmEPRDJECT0R1oS00RECTnlBYmEClTY ORPIIOJE:CTENCINEffi. 1) STORl.l llR'JNS WIll 8E INSffCTll) FOR PROTECllON OlJRlNG CONSTRUCTlOII UN11LALL SO\JRC~ WITll POTENT1AI. ~OR OlSCIWlGING ro mE INLETW.vE BEEN STABIUZED e)EROSION1JiClSEDllIENT"OOIf1Il(lL...EASlJIlES""00lHDl8llP5W1LLBE loWHT/oJNED'NEfFtCTlVEOPEllATIfoIllCONOIllOlol_ If'INSPECTIONSIH1)I(:I.T[TW.TA BliP ISNcrTOPEllATINllPROPERLT.WJtfJDWlCEOR 1oI000fICAtlOH OF THE 8IoIP WILL !IE PERFORIo.I1OD. lH\S'IIIJIll(SlWLBEPERFQRI.lEllBEFORE'!HENEXTSTOR>< f\U:tWHEJofE.'Jffi PROc1JCA.L/<HONOLAlUlTHNi1CALD<OAA [Al..YSfROI,IlHE INSPE:CT10NDA'It'lOEHSURE'rrsCOtl11NUEDE:f1'E:ClMN~ g} If.oDomONALBlIPSAAE''ECESSAAY.'fl-IEAOOII1OIoI'''LLBEloWlEBEfOREntE NEXTsmR\,l EVENT. WHENE.\Ul PRKTlCAl. ANP NOT LA1EflTI-Wl7 ClUNO>RDAYS FROloIrnEINSPi;cTlON\l.O.'fE. IFIlIPLEIolENTATIONSEFORETHENEXTSTORIdE'<ENT IS HOTPRACTI....... mE CONOlTIONS WILL BE OOCIJl,lEH'lEO IN TllEAPl'UCAaLE swppp AlIEHOllENT. mD..~.:rERw.TM: B...PS WIll BE USED ~ SOOIIM> POSSl8lL 10)0l'F-SlTESEDi...EN1SH1<J.IIEREJoIOvEl)fllOlI......P...IotJ.IENTSURf'ACESYI1IH>I 24 HOURS OF lllSCCNER'f. II} SEOllolENlSlW1.BE REIdO\IEll FROIoI AU. Sl.JRFACEWAlERSWtlllltl 1 OAYS 01' lllSCGIIERY. ll. F.w. STABlJZ.fJ\ON: TEliPDRARY STAflILl2ATIOIoI WILL flOWN IH PlACE FOR Al..LAflEOS UN11L FlWl. ST/oSlU2AllOtOOCCURS.TDCO/,OI'L-Ef(f'lw..LSTABlU2ATION.THEFOtLOWIHGlolUST ~ -STASlU2ATION/JYUNIFORlol PEJlENNlAL VEGErATM: COVEll (1O:C00ISlTT) -DfWNAOCOOCHESST.<8'UZEO -1'ElIPOIW<~ SYh"IIi8lC I< 51RUCT1JRAL !II.IPS REJ.IcJVED _SElllI.IEHT~EIlOllTOFSTORlolWAl'ER~ANCESl< SEDlIdEHT.r..TJOIoIBI<SIP<S.1<<O(LoSINSRV\JRNEIlTOOESK:NCM>M;f!Y l'HENOTICEW1IRl.lINA'I1ONSfW.lIIEVSEIlTOITJllll~l'EPER...rr~OF THE ORIGINAL STORl.EWATER PEIl>'IT "WBER OR THE SUBOMSlON REClSm>.11CIN PE:R1oI1TNlJl.(BER 7. PlJH N.lEMlWENTS: 'lHtSTORlolWATERf'DlLlI1lONPR€VEmlON~(SWPPP)WIli.BEMlENDEClIF lHEREISACKANCE"~CN.COHsn"ICTION.OPER.O.nONIlAlmtW.NCE,WEAlHER ORstASOtW..CONDIllOHS......1HASASIllNIfJCN(tIIolPACTONTHEPlSCfWlGETll 1HE: S1.IRF..a: WA'IERS OR UNDERGROUNO WATERS. mE PL1Ji W1UALSO BE NotENOErl IF IT IS PRll'/EN TO BEIN.'.OEQUAT['NCONTROWNllPOUUTANrS IN STOR\I WA1UlIJlSCH.O.RGESOUETOCQtlSIRUCTIONAClMl1ES. ll. CERTFlCAlDl OF cot.lf'l..I,l,H wrtH fEIlER.IL. STATE. NfJ lOCAL. R<ClJlJJl(lN& '!HIS STOO'" WA1Ul POU111lON PREIIENTWN PL'J-j WAS PREPAAEO INACCORil.I.IlCE WITH THl:>lf'DES/SDS G€}IERAL PElllIITFOR S1ORI.!WATffi OISClWlGEASSOCWDl wrTHACONSTRlICTIONACTMlY. AU. OlHER""'PUCABLE FEOE!W.. STATE,. OIl LOCAL R[OUIRElo!ENTS f'l)R EROsKlNAAO sall"'ENl CONTROL SITE PlANS {OIl PfRlIITS). OR STORlIWAlUllWlAOO.ltNTSIltPLAIIS(ORPERlolIT;}II'.'lEBEENTAKEHIN10 ACCOLINT""D.ou.IlEQIJIROIEWSWIUBElIIT. 9.S1tlflt.lWATER~: liYOROl.OlllCc.oLOJlATIONSII'.'lEBEEHffRmRl.IEIlTOI"OllELTHEPfl()f>()SErlAIIO EX!SlING OAAINAGE CHARACTERISTICS D~ lHE 5I1f.. /<H El'l'0flT HAS 8EEli lIAPE TO ACCOUNT Fl)fl AU SlOR... WAlER 8OT1i €mER1N<l NlO IL\'>1NC WE SITE. ~ SUCft. I.IOSTOf''IHE sm:S RUNOfF WIUIIE COLLECTED.....O 1REArro IN ST\lRI.! W"'lER 1REAT1oIENTPONDS. STOlWWAl'E!lCDffi/EY/<HcrWllLIlEPRCMllEDlIYORAlN.OI;:E SWAr..ES.CONCIlETECURlIAIII>Gul1ER./<HO"'SUB-SURl'ACEORAIw.c;ENITWORK LOCATrnlHllOUCHOUTTHE:SlTE. ll<OSEAAEAS\\'HERESlORloIWAlER~foIOTBE coua:l'EIIBYmfOFrnESYSTElISUSTEtIABO'IESl-W..LWl'IETHEHECESSoORY TElIPOIWlY II<ASURES oIolPLlm'D TO REDUCE mE IllSK OF SEDIIoIEm CONTNoIlNA1lOII R<OEllOSIONUNI1LPER"""'EN1VEGET"'1N'ECO\IE1lCAI-IBEESTABUSHED. 10.NOt+-S1'ORI.WAlER~: NON-STORII WATER IJlSCIWlCE:SWlli. liE EU...INATrn OR REDUCED TO l'HE EX1tNT FEJ<.S1BLE.. WIrn THE EXCEI'I1ON OF 1HOSE NEctsSAI<Y fOIl 1l1E COllPl.ETIOlol I>~ CERT....NCONS11lUCT1ONACTh1TIES_ AlffiIORlZEONON-S1ORIolWA1UlOlSClWlGES FROllTHISSITEINCUJOE. 1.F1RElf'rURA/{rFlUSHINGS 2. W"'TER USED FOR [lIlSTCONTROL PURPOSES .1. POTABLE WAl'ER AND UNCONTAAlINATrn W"lER Ut!t fLUSHING 4. ElClUlIIAL IlUII.DING WASH WATER VI1<EN llElEflGENT IS >roT LlSED 5.UIfCONTAlIINATrnGROuNOWAlERORSPRlNllWA1Ell 6.UIlCOIlTMolIWo,TEDEX....VATIONOEWATERlHC 7.I'Iit.Cf'J.'lC OFOC/EIoITION BASINS OR Of;_SlLTIOO &ISINSMTER RAIN EVEHrS (USi/<GPIIOl'ERFIl.TUlINCOEI/ICESPERGENERALPERJ.lf1) 8. S1REIT Cl.EANING (WHERE PERlIlTTED) mESEAUIHORIZED NON-STORld WAlER OlSCHAFtGES WlU8Eo:>IIDlK'TED IN ACCORtWfCt:: WITH '!HE ~EQLIIRElIrnrs Oi'THE tfPOES PItAS[ II PERlIrr. NlO E.'IERY EFTORTW1LLBEo.tl!l<:10llINIIolI2!:NOI<-STORIIWAlERRUNOf'FFRtIlI1l-IESESfIE ~~. 11. COHSTRUCTIOtt CHEl.IIC'.AlS Nt) POUlITNITS: '1.'SPILLPREVEIffiON THE FOU.OWINGAAE THE w.'IERW. lMIIAGDo(ENl PR.'OlcES TW.TWlLL BE USED TO REOI.ICt lNE RiSK OF SPILLS OR OTHER ACCIDENTAL EXPOSURE OF IJATERIAl5 1JiOSUBSTNlCf5'10STORllWA'ltRRUNOff. ~..... EffOI!1WllBE IJADE '10 STORE ONLY ENOUGH PROOUCT ro 00 mE REOlJ'RED.oDIl. -AU. 1.IAl'ERW-S STORED ON SIl'ESHAlL llE STORED IN A NEAT fflD ORDERLY w.N"ER. - AlL PllOIJlJCTS S!W.L !IE ~EPT IN mElR ORlllllW.- CONTAINER. wmt THE ORWJW.I.LABELSsnu....TIACHEO.lINLtS>TIiECONT....NERSAAEJo07T ,~~ -SUBSTANCES SI-W..L NOTOCl.llXEIlWfTHONEmOmERIINLtS> RECOlIIolElUlfDf1YruEIJANUFACTIJRER. -WHENMRPOSS!!lLE..1UOI'THEPfIOOOC'fSHAlLllElISEJ)UP8EFORE OlSPOsING OF THE CONT/oJNER. -w.NUfACTuREfl'S RECOlIlIEHDAnoNS FOR PROPER OlSPOSAL SII'.LL liE ~. - TIlE SITESUPEROfTEHOENlWlli.ROVT1NaYINSPEC'flHE SITE TO INSURE PROP<:R 01SPOSAL OF AU. ON SITE IMTERW-S. FDmLllERS ~ FERTlLl2ERS SIW.L 8E APf'UED ONLY It! '!HE lollNll.(UlI MlOlItI1S AS RECO"'lIENOE:OIIYTHEloWlIlF.'C1IJf!EIl. ONCE~LlED.THEFER1lLllERWlUIIE WORKED INTO THE SOIL TO UlollTTHE D:POSUR[ To T!V.Nsn::tlTSlJRFACE WATERS P....fm - AlL CONT/oJNERS WlU BEllGl<'ILY SEALED ANO STORED MiEN NO'I REOUIREDFORUSo:. D:CESSP....NTSHAlLBEPROPERLYOISPOSEDOFIN .lCCORo.<.NCEwmtl.OCALR[(;lJLATIOl<S. CONCRDt'IRUCKS-COHCRETE1RIICK5 (Al.LCONSlRl!C1KlII EQlIIPlIEHT} WILL ONLYBEAU.Gl'lUlTOWASHOurINOESIG~TEDOISCHARGEAAEAS. PROOUC'fSPEClncP~-PETRULEuIolP~OOUCTS-ALLONSITE:VEl-lICLES NlOEQIJlPlolEH'!W'L.LBEUONITOREDFORLEAKSANOREeElVEREGlILAR PRE\IEH1AlM';......HTEtWlCE TO REDUCE WE CfWlCEOf lDI<AGE. 110 ENGINE OEGREJ.srHG WILL !IE ,&,lLQWEO ON SIlL Prnouulol PROOuC'IS WIU BE SToRED IN A TIC>ffi.Y SI'-"'-ED Com1<NER. WHIOlIS CUAALY lABELED. .om.osPIW.T SUllSTANCES llSEDON SITEW1li. BE AI'l'UED ACCOROING TO WE IJANUFACruRER'S RECOl.!lIENOATlOIlS. 11.2SPIUCOK1llQLPRACIICES -AU.SPlUSWlLLBEClEANEDVPllolllEDIA1U.YAflEROISCoYOtY.IH ACCORl:\'.NCEWlTHll-lEloWlUFAC'IlIRER'SRECOloIlIEHDEIlt.lE1llCOS. _l'HESPll1A1lEAWlLlIlEKEPTwELLI/8mLA'lto. -SPlli.SOfTllXICORHAZAAOOLlSlJAlERlALSW1UllEREPOIll'EOTDlHE .<PI'ROPR"''ltAGEHCIES. -AL(1GOflHESPlUTWE.U)CI.'I1ON.l>ITL""OTIIIEWlLLOCCREATrn8Y mE JOB S\lf'ERltllEllOENl_ STORlI WA'!Ul POU\I1lOIl PREVEI1IlON PlAN WlLL8E Al).NSTDl TO ItI<:l.UOE lIEASuRES TO PflEvENT lHlSlYPE OF SPlU FROJ,lREOCCURRiNC. 11.3 IWAROOVS Yll'STES HAZARDOUS .....1Ulw.s lIUST BE STOREDANP OISPOSUl 0> PER lol.P.CA REOUlA'OO"S. SECONDARYCONTAlHUEN1&:RESTRICTEDACcESSlIUS111E PROVIOEDAAOUNOFUElJNGAAEAS(lFfoNY)OR~01RECl'EOI3TWEWATERSHED DISTRiCT. CONTAlN~ENT OEVlCES w.y Im:uJOE POLY-LlNED SOIL IlERIoL POLY_LlNEDSTRAWlW.E5.0R~ROVEOI"'PW/I(llIS_ER. 12..~BItF'S= 1)../ot!CLE mo EQUIPlIOO .......N1tNANCE""O REPAIR AC1I\IIl1ESAT mE SITE W1U BE PERI'ORloOm IN mEOES\llW.TED CONlROLAAf:<S. mls AAfATO BE f'lnD LOCATEO BYCOIl'lR'.ClORNlO EHG1i'lEER.<HO NWEO ON THE SWPPP 2)SOUOIJATERW.S.INClLIPlHG8UIUlINGll>.TtRIALS.CARllAGE.ANOOEtIllISWILl8E ClEAIlEO Ul'lWLYNlll PRO!'ERLYOCS?OSEI> OF '10 PREvE!ITTHE OISCIWlCEO!' 1HESE IJAT'ERWS '10 SURFACE WA'IERS OR TOSTORlI DRAINS. 3)WIISTERECEPTACLESWlTHU05W1LlOCPRO\'lOEllATCON\IEtI'ENlLOCAl1DNS THROuG"OUTTHESJl'E.THESERECEPTACtBAAE.TOlHEEXTtNTPRJ.C1lC'.SLE. PU<:ED IN LOCATIONS mlT 00 tIOTRECEM: SuesTAIl'TW.AI.IOUms Of"STORlI WAlERRUtIOFFANO'IilATOOtKITOFWNOIRECTlYTOSURF.IC[WAT1'R8ODIES. mELOCI\11DNSOFT1<ESERECEPTACtESTDBEOEJ[RIolINEDINmEFlELD. THE RECEl'TACLESWJU.BEElIPllEDAIIOll<EWASTEREloKNEDF1lOI.lTHESITEFOR APPROPRIATE IJlSl>OS.\LOR RECYC1JtIll ON A RtClILIJl SCNEIlULE TO PREVENT THElIFI<OIolD'I'ERFllliNG. 4) LOCATKlNS f'l)R EaulPlIENTW.oslt OUTAAv,s "'LL BEOESl::NAlUIlN mE FlEUl. EOUIP~D<T W~H WATER WILl BE: CON1ROllEO TO PREI/ElfT UIWJTHORlWl DRY wtATllEROISCHAFtCES~OTOAI>UIO"'IXINIlWITH$lOR\.lWATER S) CONSTRI!CllON IJATERlAI5At1O Ctlo.UCALS USED OR SlOREn ON SITE AIlE KEPTIH SlMU O~~ WHENEvER POSSI!I!L WHEN tIOT IN USE.. THEY WILL BE STORED IN SEAr..ED CONT/oJNERS AND ONOER COvER TO PREVENT 0lllEC'f CONTACT WI11i STORlI .WATER. APPROXllMTE LOCA'OONS D~ OCS/CAATED 1JA1ERW. NlO CHEJOLCAL S'IORAGE:AAEAS ARE ffiD'o10E0 ON mESWl"Pp w.;>. 1N(I.....oVER1ENT SP'lLS WlU BE: ClEANED UP IIoIlIEDlATD.YUPON OISCOI/ER1'ANO lliE IMTERl>l..S WlU BE OlSPOSm OF I" JCCORllAtICE WI1lJ LOCAl-.. STAlE. AND F<IlERAL REOUIREMENTS. t.) VEll<CLE FlJElJNGWlLL8ECONOUCTEDlNALOCAPONAW"YfROlI...;cESSTO SURl'ACEWA1ERS WHENEVER Pf!.IoCIlCAIlIL 010 SITE FUEL S1OAAGET""KS OTHER llWlIlPF'llOVEOPOOTA8LEFUEl.CONT....NERSSUCH.osGASC-utlECANS.WlLLWlVE A lIEA/lS OF 5ECOIOOAAT CONTIJHUENT AND WILL BE LOCAlUI. WHENEVER PR.<c1lCM!LE. U'IOERCCMR. iliff IIWl'\IffiTE}l1 SPlliSWlU BE ClL<IIED uP IlIlolEOlA1U.YUPOtlIJlSCO'\lERYAtIOll-lEW.~WILlOCOlSPOSEOOF~ .lCCORIlNICEWID1 LOC:<I.. STAlE ""0 FtDElW. REOUIREJ.lEffiS. 1) R!:lDSES OF HoUAROO\.IS SU8S1NiCES OR OtllN EXCESS OF REPORTA8LE Ql.IAIITI1I[SINSTORIolW...TEROISCIWlGESFROlImECO/oISTRIJC1IONSITEWlUBE REPORl'EDASREOUIRfllf1YTHE~CCP.NlO1HESWPPPWlUBE 1ol00lFlED\II11l'IIN7CA1DllW!o.o.YSOFlEAANIIlllOFTHEREll.ASE. SWI'I'P UDDIf'lC\TIONSWIllBEREcor<DEDItOSECTIONR'IOREftECTTHEREIDSE. lIlCUJOlOOAOESCRlPllONOFTHERElDSE.THEClRCUIoIST~CESLEAOIIlllTOTIiE RELD.SENlOWEOATEOFlltE:RElL\SE. 'lNE:SWPPPlolOOlF\CA'I1ONWlU"'-.SO 1OENl1FY RESPONSES TO BE [Io(Pl.OYUl FOR SUCH REl.EASES""O IolEASURESTO PREvENT WE REOCl:UllllENCEOF SUCH RElEASES. !I)POIlTAllLETOILErSAAEPRCMOEDONSI1E. LOCATIONSTDBEDETERlIlNEDIN "~ 9)S1R1PSOFlJAl\IREVEGETATIONSlWiEiEPR[SER\IUlWHENEvERPOSSlBlE. lP) CliARlHG NOD GRUBBING....1UML SHIJ.t BE QtIPPErI UP NlO USED FOR EROSIONCON'IRDLWHENEVERPOSSIBLE. 1') WI"'CD STYLE CATCH BASIN IHSERTS SIWJ.. BE USfD rN AU.S11JR1,< 5B'I'ER....1OI BASINS 13. S1ORI.I 'W.TER POlLlJ11ON Pfl&'EHl1OH pt),N: I CERTIfY UNOER PE!<O.L'IY (IF LAW TW.T THIS POCUlolEN1N.JIIAl..LAnACHr.<ENTS WERE PREPAAE!lUN(l[R 111 OlRECTJON OR SUPEIlVISlOO IN ACCURoANCEWITH ASiSTELI OESICNED'IO.osSIIRE1H'.TQUlUFlEDPERSONNF:LPROPERLYG.o.l\iEREO/<HOfYALI.IAlUI lHE IHRlRlIA'I1ON SV8Jo<mED. !lASED ON II1IHQUIRY OF mE Pf1lSON OR PERSONS WHOr.<.ow.GI:'fl-IESYSTtlIllRTI-fOSEPERSoI<SlllREC'fLYRESPDNsI8LEfORGIIWERlflll mo INFORIJATIOIoI. 1l'IE INfuRw.TION SUBloImED IS. TO mE !lEST Of...... KNOWLEDGE ""OBWEF.mUE.ACCURATE.~OCOlolPLETE. INoIAWAALTH.\TH!ERE'-'lE SlGNIFlCN<TPENALTIE5 ~OR SUOlllTl1NG FALSE INFOllUAtlON.INCWOING mE POSSllllU1Y OFf'lNEAI<DOoIPRlSONl,IEHTFORKNClWINGI'lOUI'I1ONS Sl(:NED' DATE: XXX.P.E. CEJrnflEOEROSIOH/SED""EtlTCONTR(lLSPECWJSf (llWNER) I ""'IE REMEWED.....O ACCEI'T '!HE CONOmoNS OF mls PlAN SGIIED: ~w (CONTf!ACll)R) IHAVE~E'HEDANO.ICCEPT'fl-IECONOmoNSOFTHISPlAN slGtIrn: OATF' ~\@~." , ."..,.,...? >" """-"0,"<; -'" <1""".>.1: Il>CAlloN MAP NO SCALE ~~~a~ 1505023rdAvenuBNorth Plymoulh,Minnesota55447 T763-746-1600 F763-746-1699 11110Indus1riaICirdeNW,SulteE EIk.River,Minnesola55330 T763-241-o108 F763-241.8351 Y/W'N.sd1oenmadson.oom PROJECT ARDEN PLAZA REDEVELOPMENT SOUTHWEST QUADRANT COUNTY ROAD E I LEXINGTON AVE ARDEN HILLS. MN CLIENT ARDEN PLAZA. LLC 4255 WHITE BEAR PARKWAY, SUITE 1550 WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110 651.247.7007 CONSULTANTS REVISIONS - 7~2-O7 CItySobmltlal Il>er,bycer1ifythatthlapran,apecification, or report was ",,"pared by me or l.lnder my dlmet.upe...-l.ronan<lthaUamad,,'Y UcenndPtofanlonalEnglnHrund8l' the laws of the State of Minnesota. Oavl<lRoodlll OATE:_UC.NO.: CHECKED BY PDSJDR DESIGNED BY " DRA.WNBY " PROJECT NO. DATE 64546-001 7-'l~7 TlTLESHEET STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) SHEET NUMBER C6 NORTH 50' , , /1 i ,J ----+:r-:~'~I : ,)> I r L IL. i:l1t.. ~: ~1i : ~ : f~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ;. "I " ~ .. I. to " f-; ~ " " t:. '."':" f ~ ::l; :,. - /.~~~_._~ . ' i l' -_ ". '" ..j'..'" l t--'. I ,- I" ;']."" ! l.. ,,~ ,:, 1::'::-; h \;1 ,!;~--"-'< ft ~'Iib ;;:-::: I;, ~!! "- I 1" ;.j';. "'E,' \ "mMLi.\", i: ::IIr:: i ",j "" I: J~\~' i I ~ i" '1."'1 ~'. ~ r." .1"' " !.':I)U"lo__.~. I" I'"..h .".)i'.' ' ll.. , 1\'.~. .'''('~~.''. I: ,lr~<<~' 'I"'"'i~ f~" 11,," II I" ,,,,,, !I: I:L~ ;" ! ~ ~-l~' j.. I., I" . t ! . r--:':,:.ni" 11'" h r,." I 1" " " '., '1:"" " <,,, " ,." " ",;.. I. .,.. l.. " " ,." u " COUNTY UF-,U '. '.. ~~; ;&i':;~'~':?,,,'Eo,::;c ;, ~.~_." ./ ;,.'!--.....--...---"'. l< .. " " "R:O.'W.'DEbICATtort_~',.-;__~~."",~_."",,~... " .. .. ~ " " ;,~~':-: j;u--", \, \, ~: "~,~,~: ~:~~--:~'~' ~.'~.f!:~,\"::;',:_::::__~: _,_ ~:_:;-~~;'.';:~~~~'~~~~_::.:_~:~~ '__ ~__ . :'.: :;_~__~ : .. jE ~~I~ ~~i,;,!~~j'~~'.J;\r! _~~j 'j ~:1~ V~I:'~:r~)~ ,Ff . /=~:, i: is ~~;: 1+ : II , h..,f, > it L;;c.,..:' ..t:;;. if FFE;',,, ~~ C:-;: '":1;: "t ~ Iii r . "' I v' ";0>>i ~t.. ~< ~ "' ~ "' r - '[' fl " J. ';: ~ ": i ii;+;J J;, ......, 'j ~"'h ::::;i : I:: :1 .1\ "h'l",. "i ~; h,~V'~J<':' PA-."~' ""'!-" "1,1" ,.i Y "'~I>.. 1;'''7..''~ ~,-:; !...~":'li';"";- (3)>..,_' ~i'H\.'~" 9."+ ,~\-.p... l,j Ii! : , -~.' ,<, >..,-'....' - - J" ,. i' ii ~i ~,"I "'~," h" ';jy"'~:",~ ":'1" ...;."'......~."... H\ "iJ - fl " " " ~,,"j' '"-"r'~ ....~, ,;&:'.. _"-,,,,"/.4' ';T ~" ." " - i"'~.<L::,~:I~~~1 j\:I~~ ~f~;Ji ~"-<".tt~t~2=t: '= M: I ::::i:~U~rtJ~r::~j1":',~' ....M!~(':!H:~ ":~ll: r :"-~;'.r'....,..':.~. '.. ~.'\"\'/ l">"" ."h '" '.; ,IJ 1.. "/':. ,I, 1'1" I .. ' ". ~!'~.1:-1~.:~:---~~:_t/A ~ ;~~:_'::~_ ~:u 1. b ;>.; ;':;-'-7'.-' ~_ h._ h ~~t=.~;t.'~;,f.::;:irt.'r;r.br.\r.l' ~ ~'~.~.f_-= -~<' -~ ~~ :11: I\i ~f~~~i@~.' ".:.. ~ : ! 'j:~.1 ~1_1[M:! ~. :~~~';~f:.~~~ l~: T~;W;; : :: "1~iVI~13j rI41:rj:I4r#1 :-:, ': ." h~ ~:;:::< ;:-::~ 2;.:::r: ,"i~j;~~~tjLI~~:6~~:"~ tlf.~:~ ':=~~'~:~~'~: :":'::~~~ :"1'" :'. c '-~ ~~~ .":~ ;J"' .. rr:tlf~ u ,. " " " .. " 'u;;;~Jt ".\u : : :::\~ -: : : : : I t.,vi;;~' .,:~~c~ ....~ ':~;;) _i\ : : : ~ :11" ;. ;,',,,,,,,,- 4 ~-'"-~.:: _\0 i.-.... '" .. ,': '. '-' 10 ''\'\..." '.1.... u FFE~.OO ;.;:, ;,..';';.{," :'1 :, ' ~;. '" I I b ~l' "'\,"\'1''' l uJ~ " u "",. 'J i, " .':j,',.~ 1 b .. __ .i:~~'.' ::__., ---'(" {. h " "",-:'>1 ","--.., '" " ~ ;,. : :~ ~ : : ~ ::: ::5i? -: : : : = :L_. , r i' ,oJJ . \. _ u "'_~-:--~, ,. 1, ',1J '" '" .',u " " " " h U ." ,.. ;. l> l" 1, to":",, h'" b 1> .. '" h \, " , ;; ,. to I" .. \. .. 10 t.' b t. ,. '.. h h, -" '~ .. "", .. .. '" '" .,- ..""" '. ,,;... " " .. l..j.. .. " FIXTURES MUST BE THE FOl OWING: I' Project: All Pro'ects Oty Label Symbol 14 A r~Fl 2 0 Fl 2 00 ~ 6 E El 6 W H 10 X t Numeric Summary Project: All Projects Lobel j Colc Type All Areas I Illuminance ~~; DISCLAIMER This lighting pion specifies luminaires supplied by ALD. Any deviation from this plan or use of luminaires other than ALO products will require full submittal of fixture sample, drawings. and lighting pion to city, engineer and landscape architect for prior approval. / IY U (!! - Ii L- j' ~~ Ii; <t "i il These calculations ore NOT volid for owner or city approval using any ~nor:-ALD represented productH or fixtures not shown on this plan. Fixtures must be provided by ALD. Calculations hove been performed with aur best interpretation of tile details given to us. Some differences between measured and calculated results may occur due to intolerances in calculation metllods, testing procedures, component performance, measurement techniques and field conditions sucll os voltage, temperature variations, lamp manufacturer variations, and other variables. Calculations da not toke into cansiderotio'1 objects such os, but not limited to, trees. buildings. pavement. sidewalk, or cars. Calculation values represent horizontal (i.e. light meter facing straight up) illuminance FC levels (unless otherwise noted)_ If the reol environment conditions do not no.tch the input do.to., dif'f'erences will occur between Measured vo.lues and ALD is not responsible for acquiring or interpreting any local lighting codes_ ,- Ii, hi !: 1\' I' !: ! Ii Ii '1 /; I' I; Ii II Ii Ii Ii Ii Ii 1 ); ,. i! ~ ,. These lighting colculations ore not 0 substitute for independent engineering analysis by 0 professional engineer. ALD,lnc. ARCHIlECTURAL UGHTING DESIGNS,INC. 2920 ANTHONY LANE ST. ANTHONY, MN 55418 612-252-4100, 612-252-4141 fax CONTAC~ SCOTT HARMES Maintained light levels at 0' high using Widelite AL3P fixtures. 30' Round tapered aluminum poles, 3' base. 320PSMH Verticol lomps. Flat gloss lens (full cutoff) Existing wall pocks ore estimates only. (!; II! !'l' e ~i I i I. [I 'I' Iii z!1 01: ~_) I i /...11 :: I ;lll 1-'->'.1 (IT [I Area =215749 Sq_Ft. Total Watts = 11408 Lighting Power Density =0.053 WottsjSq.FL TYPE x= Existing wall packs unknown. Estimated 175MH lamps Estimated mt height of 15' a.i"... ~~ WIDELlTE AL3P VERTICAL L.P.MP FL.P.T GLASS LENS EXISTING WALL PACK UNKNOWN tAMP (175MH EST.) 15' ESTIMATED MT. HEIGHT I: Filename; G:\Server1\CAD\SCOTT\Schoell\Arden Plozo\ltg.o32 Dote;6/28/2007 Description Wide lite AL3M 2-,320PSMH 5F Wide lite AL3M 320PSMH 3F HS WideJite AL3M -, 320PSMH 3F HS Widelite AL3M 1 320PSMH 3F Wide!ite AL3M 1 320PSMH 4F Existing Wall Pocks (estimated Arrangement BACK BACK SINGLE TWIN SINGLE SINGLE SINGLE HS (Wall mount) 175MH) Units Fe I Min I 0.0 WATTS PER Project: All Lobel Total Area A'9 1.27 Me> 8.1 ! Avg/Min I MaxiMin I 0.00 I 0.00 MOUNT HEIGHT Project: All Projects SeqNo Lobel c+-- A 2 A 3 A 4 A 5 A 6 A 7 A 8 A 9 A \0 A \1 A 12 A 13 A 14 A 15 D 16 D 17 DO 18 DO \9 E 20 E 21 E 22 E 23 E 24 E 25 W 26 W 27 W 28 W 29 W 30 W 3\ X 32 X 33 X 34 X 35 X 36 X 37 X 38 X 39 X 40 X Lumens 30000 30000 30000 30000 30000 14000 Filename AlM405F.IES ALM403FS.IES ALM403FS.IES ALM403F.lES ALM404FS.!ES wlp175m.ies LLF 0.720 0.720 0.720 0.720 0.720 0.650 SQUARE FOOT Projects Area I Total Watts 215749 11408 co.lculo.ted vo.lues. Z 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 15 15 \5 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 20 20 20 20 20 20 \5 \5 15 15 15 15 15 \5 \5 \5 LPD 0_053 ~ ~~Ot!J~:~ 15050 23ro Avenue North Plymouth,Minnesota55447 T763-746-1600 F763-746-16S9 11110InduslrialCircleNW,Su1teE E!k River, Minnesota 55330 T763-241.(1108 F763-241-8351 VfflW.schoeamadson.com PROJECT ARDEN PLAZA REDEVELOPMENT SOUTHWEST QUADRANT COUNTY ROAD E' LEXINGTON AVE ARDEN HILLS, MN WaIT ARDEN PlAZA, LLC 4255 WHITE BEAR PARKWAY, SUITE 1550 WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110 651.247.7007 CONSULTANlS REVISIONS .7-02-07 CltySubmitt:ol I tMreby certjfy that thi& plan, apo.cificaUon, o,,,,portwasp,,,pare!lbymallfundermy dJred&upervl&Jonand thallamaduly Uc8n..d Profeuional Engln<KIrlUldflr thelaW1l olthaStata 01 Mlnna:sola. David Rood.1 DATE:~Llc.Na., CHECKED BY PDSlDR DESIGNED BY " DRAWN BY " PROJECT!olO. DATE 6454&-001 7.2--(J7 TITLE SHEET PRELIMINARY LIGHTING PLAN SHEET NUMBER C7 SITE DATA ZONING DISTRICT B-2 GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT ZONING REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED BUILDING SETBACKS FRONT REAR SIDE 50' 26' 20' PARKING SETBACKS FRONT REAR SIDE 26' 5' 5' LOT INFORMATION TOTAL PROPERTY AREA AREA IN HIGHWAY EASEMENT NET AREA 546,561 Sf. : 12541 ACRES 65,200 Sf. : L4'36ACRE5 481,361 Sf. = lIDSI ACRES EXISTING: FLOOR AREA (EXISTING: RETAIL PLUS EXISTING OFFICE) PROPOSED FLOOR AREA (EXiSTING RETAIL PLUS PROPOSED RETAIL! 105,865 SF '31,600 Sf. PROPOSED FLOOR AREA RATIO (MAX. FAR ALLOWED ' 6.8) 51,600 Sf. I 481,361 Sf. ' 0.203 AREA COVERED BY STRUCTURE (MAX, ALLOWED = 40 %) ~1,666 SF. 2e>.3 % AREA covERED BY LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPED AREA 1 NET AREA (HIN. REQUIRED" 2!7 %) 121718 SF 121,218 Sf. / 481,361 SF. 25.2% PARKING EXISTING RETAIL SALES FLOOR AREA (BASED ON 00% OF TOTAL AREA) I STALL REQUIRED PER 156 SF. 42,064 Sf. 2B6 PROPOSED RETAIL SALES FLOOR AREA (BASED ON 80% OF TOTAL AREA) I STALL REQUIRED PER 156 SF 36,016S.F. 246 TOTAL STALLS REQUIRED 526 TOTAL STALLS PROViDED 46B ACCESSIBLE STALLS REQUIRED B ACCESSIBLE STALLS PROviDED ~ ~ ) Nll'l.4.....E COUNTY ROAD E . i EXIST. f<ETA~1Nl> - E><l5TN:i ~ Nll'l"4!,.,'E ! EXISTING BUILDING W ::J Z W > <( Z ~ (9 Z X W ...J >i5'l"4t"1'E 'OO~ . , PROPOSED BUILDING "6" RETAIL 16,230 S.F. FINISHWFLOOR B-EVATlON'S39.00 ~ 2&'.0> .~. 1&;'.6' NEW~IDEIlIAl.K ~~ ..~'C ~ EXIST.Sl:iN EXISliI'!:> ~~ PROPOSED BUILDING "C" i:> OFFICE/RETAil }; 14,3005.F. FINISHED FLOOR ElEVATION ~!l40. EX1STING-POND .,' ~'I"-C' EXISTN:> c_ ~eo .e ~- ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN -$ 200' o 50' 100' 1 "=1 00'-0" , - - NORTH ~ ! I = POPE ASSOCIATES INC. 1255 ENERGY PARK DRIVE ST. PAUL, MN 55108-5118 PH. (651) 642.9200 FAX (651) 642-1101 <>~ IQ)~INIU'\!II~ 00 properties ARDEN PLAZA ARDEN HillS, MN CITY SUBMITTAL ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN Issues ~nd Revisions: CITY SUBMITTAL CITY SUBMITTAL 07/02/07 08/20/07 I h~'~r ~"Iilllhollhi\ ,I(Il,sp"ili"lilli\,~ ~::;i~~f~:~I:h~N : :1 .:;:~li~~"~~ld Archill~lllHi~r I" lOr! II ., II, 01 Wll"~~I" "'R,1'll' li,. 110, Ir~1 M.Ol!l1/1 Crornission N~. OIQwnby CnHied by_ 16226-07012 TS,KH RP SHEET A1.l J /'" "'\ '< )' WAl("#lFFl.I."'~JIFt1I'MAli;R!AU;, FACE eRlCl<'1, MAtU=ACT\Jf<SR, COlOR , SIZE, ca-l56R1CKOO. TANGERlNEYEI.O.RWI~ClJT UTlLlTY FACE 6!<.lCK '2 , TO MATCl-I6RlCK ON EXIST~ mAil 6UILDm ROCl<FACEatl 'I, MANJ=ACilJRER, COlOR., SIZE, ~ELD 6lOCK co. 5T ANOAJ<D "21 OR '2!2:S NCHlNAl. 1&' L~ x 13' I-IIG1 5MOOTJ.IFACEMAN.FACTUF1fDL!ME5TCtlE , MAMJ=AC1IR:R , ROCl<CA&T COlOR, 6.FFe>TalE t1AN.F~, CCNTn-eNTAL5TOE COLOR, IIIl'J& 51ZE, 3!;/&'XII!;/&'X2313I8' I"eTALFLA$I-I a.I pARAf'ET UJAU .g;"~~ARAFEr - """""'''''' M""""""'" Lt1E5TetE ALlNrI'U1WlNDo.u SYSTEM FACE 6RICK 'I .~~~ ilJlN~ 5T~IJItiISE,olM HETALAiJ.N1N:lr AUI'l>U10ND0W SYSTEM AL.lt11NJ15TOREFRCNr errRANCE 6Y6TEM 1OO'-IZl' +FiNl5I4EDFLOdR 5TA:-IDIHG:5EAM HETAl.AlU-l1N:lr T6PCfP~ '.0' OOR NORTH ELEVATION 1/16"=1'-0" aENERALNOtE, F<.O::f' TOP ~IT$ TO ec iOCREENEDUrTl-llOClODfF'LASTICI YlNYL FAINTED TO MATCl-I. o 8' IoJ'" 16' 32' METALFLA5Illlt:'l ON PARAPeT lIlAU. """""'''''' M""""""'" LIMESTONE ALI..Mil'U1WINDCIlI SYSTEM SIGN AD e!:YaID FACE 6I<lCK 'I ROCl<FACEa1J"l 13:;'-,,' FACe 6RlCK '2 euILDlNGef'fOND~..:_ 100'-0' SOUTH ELEVATION 1/16"=1'-0" FRONT TOWER ELEVATION 1/16"=1 '-0" ~__12J.'..:I!Jr? : 'TOP Cf PARAPET l O'~ ~\ '? i -L----~~~ FtNI5I-IEDi'l.C'OR o 1.- """""'''''' MAm'"",;s, Llt1E5TCNE FACE BRICK 'I EAST ELEVATION 1/16"=1 '-0" ':):;'-B' 8' 32' 32' HETALFLA6I-IIN:lr ctIF'~lIlAU. FACE 6I<ICK 'I - T6PCf'P~ 16' """.,,' INSl-I3:i-R:~ lJ' WEST ELEVATION 1/16"=1 '-0" o IoJ'" AUI1OU10ND0W 5Y51Et1W1 ef'ANDI<eLGLAS5 ,', ,- u , , ,r, 8' 16' POPE ASSOCIATES INC. 1255 ENERGY PARK DRIVE ST. PAUL, MN 55108-5118 PH. (651) 642-9200 FAX (651) 642-1101 <>~ o lQ)~lNJO~ propertIes ARDEN PLAZA ARDEN HillS, MN ~'''~.,. .,,,: :1,' I ',;! !,i~ pi,]" cpr: iI it'll "',J .tI',"~ l';' n;:nJ.:-:; 'i!1 ;d,'~; 1il', JI":"". . :',; i~." i :r. " ~:Ii I':: ,:,~:;,:L", :>mnis :~~ I'h. 16226-07012 ___.IS,KR RP l:' ~ '.1':;:, l\ :,' ::ile,~':;U'~' SHEET All J \ , ~&~____I TOf' Cf= FAAAFET 100'-0' Fl 511eDA.00R ~~&~-F~-- 1el0'-O' +11. 7, .~g;;~PAAAi=ET-- - RO FOlt<OATICt4WALL WlT14 MORtAR MlX FlNI5I-l MET"""",,", """""''''' c;,/lWf>T(trPJ ------roP~F'~ -~~Cf=cANopY" 108'-8' -4'0P'~~ W'I.I. PECORA'"' L1Gl-I11NGttrP) 100'-0' -$;100'-!1>'. WEST ELEVATION 1/16"=1'-0" 32' o 8' ~ 16' ------roPCf=F~ - -DECORATIVE LIGl-ITIN5ITTPJ """"" &TOOI' NORTH ELEVATION 1 /16"=1'-0" -FiHl5lm-r~. ~~g;;~ PARAFtT- ~e~pARAf'lrr .w-O' OOR EAST ELEVATION 1/16"=1'-0" SOUTH ELEVATION 1/16"=1'-0" POPE ASSOCIATES INC. 1255 ENERGY PARK DRIVE ST. PAUL, MN 55108-5118 PH. (651) 642-9200 FAX (651)642-1101 <>~ [Q)~!i'<!J~ """"'0 properties ARDEN PLAZA ARDEN HilLS, MN BUILDING 'C' ELEvM'ONS ARE ONLY CONCEPTUAL. ACTUAL DESIGN OF Tf.IiS BUIL::JING 15 NOT DEFINED AT T><IS TIME. i@ ~ A3.3 POPE ASSOCIATES INC. 1255 ENERGY PARK DRIVE ST. PAUL, MN 55108-5118 PH. (651) 642-9200 FAX (65!) 642-1101 WEST ELEVATION 1/16"=1'-0" 8' 16' 32' <>~ [Q)~i":!J8~ 00 properties o I.~ ARDEN PLAZA ARDEN HillS, MN '~ ~ A3.3 r~ ~ A3.3 ,@ ~ A3.3 SOUTH ELEVATION 1/16"= 1'-0" o I.~ 8' 16' 32' CITY SUBMITTAL BUilDING "e" ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION 1 /16"=1 '-0" ISSUfs@oRevisions: CITY SUBMITTAL CITY SUBMITTAL 07/02107 08/20/07 16' 8' 32' o J.- IlIerlll wlilllf"llhil pllll,l,e~ili"lillCl,11 ::~:~i~:n,~a~~li!::1 o:1~[i~~;:!(1 lrchltulllliler tile Im.1 . lol! ~[ il"IIel!I~. DOll odD NORTH ELEVATION 1/16"=1'-0" 16226-07012 KH RP loa R. Itf< lit. 11>, I~I CffiTllissionNo. Drawnbv (heded bl SHEET o 1.- 8' 16' 32' A3.3 I' BUILDING "II" SIGNIIGE [] 1. .4 BUILDING "A" NE ELEVATION a 16" 32" 1oJ""_ -- 15 A3.4 BUILDING "A" WEST ELEVATION a 16' 32' 64' Iol"'_ ' i 14 AS.4 BUILDING "A" SOUTH ELEVATION o 16' 32' 64' IJ"'_ ' IT- -- r 13 A3.4 BUILDING "A" NORTH ELEVATION o 16' 32' 64' 101""_ ' I .00 --: -;: TI ... ... '@2 , - ~ A3.4 BUILDING "A" EAST ELEVATION o 16' 32' ...-- WALL MOUNTED SIGNS 71J~d4'lU~ ..,..,~" &IGNAI 5IGNAREA.*.835!' () x . lil:l.4~5FJ l!~H;;I()1 ~~~d1b5F I1X.232!3f'J :'!j If-JHAt-(~;:"Ar.yl ~REAd'lj5F ,,)(.38251'1 TOTAl WAil 51GN5PRoPoSFD EA&TWALL, &15351' NORTHUlALL &U35F 1J.E5TWALL, 368351' 50JTIlWALL 0fZJ5F WINDOW SIGNS r=; to SIGN AS 5IGNAREA,llIlJ5F (4 X ~ "0.4 5F! ~nI15r"'~?!<!?P(l5FD EA&TWAlL 1(!)25F NOf;';IlWALL 1<1l15F GRAPHJCS {~~l ;:~:~, ,"'" TOTALGRAPllIC5Pf<DP05ED NORlHEA$TII.IALL 35.151' AUXILIARY SIGNS r-"-1 [~ ~~~~A. ,.. ~ [IIE)!],I ~~~A &fZJ5F TOTAL AUXILIABLi'llr.,N.<; PRCf"05I'D NORT'iWALL &,<)51' W\lTHWALL &"51' L r@ ~ A3.4 ,.' BUILDING "6" SIGNIIGE BUILDING "B" SOUTH ELEVATION 16' 32' 64' ..- ' ~ BUILDING "B" EAST ELEVATION ,@ ~ A3.4 r~ i A3.4 -I o If,;" '-.-- ,,' ~ BUILDING "B" NORTH ELEVATION WAll MOUNTED SIGNS {A,~,~"".,,, LJ """",,,, TOTAl WAil SIGNS FROPOSf'D ~ (I GIG! Ell l 51GN ~~:: 1;~;) i:A5TIlIALL. 4C."SF NORnlWALL &'lh5F 1lE5TuJALL, &'lbSF &OlIiHWALL ()fZJ$ o 15' 32' 64' l.:"_ ~. ~ BUILDING "B" WEST ELEVATION o 16' I..r"_ ". ,@ i 3.4 M r ,0 ~~ I BUILDING "C SIGNIIGE l BUILDING "C" WEST ELEVATION o 16' J2' ...-- u 0.' i~ BUILDING "C" SOUTH ~~V~TION" u -TI l~ BUILDING "C" EAST EtE~A~~ON ~-I BUILDING "C" NORTH ELEVATION M i@ ~ 3.4 o 16' J2' .....- WALL MOUNTED SIGNS , {I SlGNAREA,.w5F 14x.I{,OSl'I 51GNGJ TOTAl WALL SIGNS FROFOSE.Q EAST IIIALL , OOl!lSl' NORTHIIIALL' OOl!l5F u.ESTWALL Ol!l5F SOUTHIIIALL. OEJ5F 0.' 0.' ,@ i .4 0. '~ ~ A3A i@ ~ A3.4 MONUMENT SIGNS I~.l!)' > ,. ARDEN PLAZA . TENMlTNAME TENMlT NAME TENMlT NAME TENMlT NAME TENMlT NAME TENMlT NAME :\> i) " > 5'.l!)' W-l!)' -------------~t.SRlCATEDMETAL F~IN6TOMATOl euILDl>G ~L"IllI.MINATED SIGN (100 SF) SMQOl1lFACE GASTSTaolE TOMATCHelJlLDNG FACEElRIO<'1TOMATOl 6JILOINCi ROO< FACE 0"lJ TO MATCH OOLDIN6 ~~ ,',l!)' ~~TEeLOCK [~=~=====L=~J F<XWAll~ MONUMENT SIGN "C" (ALONG LEXINGTON AVE.) o 2' 4' 8" a'.a' . s ill "i' . . 5'-l!)' a'-a' '-.-- PR6'ABRlCATEDMETAL FLASllIN:;TOMATOl 6JILDIN:> ~ MA~AL CI-I~A6LE COPT mJ5F1 5MOOTHFACEC.A5TSTOi<E TOMATCH6lJILD~ INTE~L"(ILlI,NINATED S SI(;lol18S.S5F) FACEeRlCK'l TO MATCH 6lJILDIN:> R.OCKFACE Q1U TOMATo! elJILDIN<> ,- ,'.",' ~~';T~ElLOCK ['= =':::1 = = = = C'= = ] MONUMENT SIGN "B" (AT THE INTERSECTION OF COUNTY ROAD E AND LEXINGTON AVENUE) I""."" ,. ARDEN PLAZA ~ 9 TENANT NAME TENMlT NAME TENANT NAME TENANT NAME TENMlT NAME TENANT NAME " > 5'-l!)' Il!)'-",' o 2' 4' 8' 1oJ""_ ~PF1EFA6RlCATEDMETAL F!.A5IlINC.TOMATCH 6JILDINC. INTE~L"(ILLI.MIHATED S!GNII"""SFI S,'1OO11lFACEGASTSTCNE '0 MAlCH6lJILDINCi fAGEElRliX"110MATCI-l elJlLOING ROCK FACE CMJ TO MATCH 6JILDIN6 G.~D~ ,'.",' I ~WNCRElEBLOCK L-L,-----.--J_---'_J FCU'VATI~ [__~___.__L MONUMENT SIGN "A" (ALONG COUNTY ROAD E) o 2' 4' 8' '.-- ' POPEAsSOCIATCSINC, '2SS ENERGY PARK DRIVE ST.PAUI.,MNsSI08'SIlB PH.(6SI)642-9200 FAX[6SI1642,1I(l1 o~ [QJ~~~ll~ Oq-~$ ARDEN PLAZA ARDEN HillS, MN CITY SUBMITTAL SIGNAGE 1,~~lII4!:lIi,i." CITYSUBMlTTAL CITYSUBMllTAL 07102llJ7 ~, IhureIClllilllllllii'pl."",,;licllilll.g, :~:i:i",P~:'~h:l~r: ~ ~~:";i~;d"l !.rd1il<<l..llllh.!"",1 Igllllii",,,,I, jd.P~, Li<,IIo, I~I c,m";,,,lb ~,,"bJ ll1!Cl~;1 16226-07012 KHTS '" SHEET A3.4 _J ; i , ! i 'J !l Ii " " ,I IL D o .. ; II I ; " I I I I I I I I I , I ( 6: I I , I I , I I I I I I I I I" I ,~ ''--,),. \ I \.,. I \ I I I I I I I L________________________ "*~ D ,"~~~~ "0 ~"W',v;, --__ __ "'_"1. __...../ --------- 1llilil . . D ! "C'. ..,,' .~~ ~f~~' II: II: i: II: ; It It II: II: II: II: It II: 1.f-*" . . rn SCAlE: 1":= 40' NORTH LANDSCAPE PLAN w :::> z w > <( TREESREauIREOINTOTALCALlPSRINCHES~GROSSA.OORAREADMD8lBYJ2\l. GROSSBUlLDIIIGfLOORAREA.97,600U. 97,6001320.3\l5CAL.INCHES TOTALCAUPERINCHESPROPOS!:OWITIlISPtAN=22S TOTALCAUPERINCliESPRESEmVQNsm:=H!26 CAUPERtNCHEST08EPRESERVEDIPROTECTEO~662 CAUPERINCHESPROPOSEOFORRl:MOVAL.~ CITY REQUIREMENTS " z o f- CJ Z X L.tJ --" N N 92 PERENNiAlS , IneaceaU rea <IIlIClJm~1 aum n5S1 nea easas erne IS a ennl5e m am n " ~ ro elums ,"' COMMENTS B&B 32"MIN ^ 2"MIN.OIA 14'HGT. B&B 32 MI .OlA. 24"MI ^ S'HGT. B&B 22" MIN. OlA. TeAl. , PLANTING DETAILS POPE ASSOCIATES INc. I2s,ENERGVPARKDRIVE ST.PAUL,MN"'0S.'''S PH,(6SI).-..u-.9WO FAX{6'1l6~NIOI ARDEN HILLS PLAZA ARDEN HILLS, MN CITY SUBMITTAL LANDSCAPE PLAN .._hll"': ISSVED REISSUED 6f1812i1D7 sr:lOl2DOl (.oj.... ...lir "'" 18226-07012 " SHEET L100 , ; i , 1 , 1 " !l Ii .' II ,I ~ GENERAL NOTES 1. lANDSCAPE COtnRACTOR SHALL INSPECT THE SITE AND BECOME FAMIUAR WITH EXISTING CONomON$ RELATING TO mE NATURE AND SCOPE OF WORK. 2. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY PLAN LAYOUT AND BRING TO THE ATTEtmON OF THE lANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DISCREPANCIES WHICH MAY COMPROMISE THE DESIGN OR INTENT OF THE LAYOUT. lANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHAll ASSURE COMPLWlCE WITH APPLICABLE CODES AND REGUlATiONS GOVERN!NG THE WORK AND MATERIALSSUPPUED. 4. LANDSCAPE CONTRA.CTORSHALL PROTECT EXISTING ROADS, CURBS/GUTTERS, TRAILS, TREES, LAWNS AND SITE ELEMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. DMlAGE TO SAMESHALL BE REPAIRED AT NO ADOmONAL COST TO THE OWNER. 5. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY AUGNMENT AND LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND AND ABOVE GRADE unLmEs AND PROVIDE THE NECESSARY PROTECTION FOR SAME BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS (MINIMUM 10' CLEARANCE). 6, LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION AND PLANTING lNSTAUATlON WITH OTHER CONTRACTORS WORKING ON SITE. 7. UNDERGROUND UTlLmES SHALL BE INSTALLED SO THATTRENCHES DO NOT CUT THROUGH ROOT SYSTEMS OF EXISTiNG TREES TO REMAIN. 8. EXISTING CONTOURS, TRAILS, VEGETATION, CURBIGUTTERANDOTl-lER ELEMENTS ARE BASED UPON INFORMATION SUPPLIED TO Tl-lE lANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BY OTHERS. lANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY lANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF SAME. S. HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL ALIGNMENT OF PROPOSED WALKS, TRAILS OR ROADWAYS ARE SUBJECTTO FIElD ADJUSTMENT REQUIRED TO CONFORM TO LOCAl.1ZED TOPOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS AND TO MINIMIZE TREE REMOVAL AND GRADiNG. CHANGES IHALlGNMENT AND GRADES MUST BE APPROVED BY THE lANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO IMPLEMENTATION. 10. lANDSCAPE CONTAACTOR SHALL REVlEWTl-lE SITE FOR DEFICIENCIES IN SITE CONDITIONS WHICH MIGHrNEGATlVELY AFFECT PLANT ESTABUSHMENT, SURVIVAL OR WARRANTY. UNDESIRABLE SITE CONDITIONS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO Tl-lE ATTENTION OF lliE lANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR 10 BEGINNING OF WORK. 11. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ONGOING MAINTENANCE OF NEWLY INSTALLED MATERIALS UNTIL TIME OF SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION. REPAIR OF ACTS OF VANDALISM OROAW.GE WHICH MAY OCCUR PRIOR TO SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE lANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. 12. EXISTING TREES OR SIGNIFICANT SHRUB MASSINGS FOUND ON SITE SfW.L BE PROTECTED AND SAVED UNLESS NOTED TO BE REMOVED OR ARE LOCATED IN AN AREA TO BE GRADED. QUESTIONS REGARDING EXISTING PlANT MATERIAL SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE lANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO REMOVAL 13. EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN, UPON DIRECTION OF lANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, SHALL BE FERTILIZED AND PRUNED TO REMOVE DEAD WOOD, DAMAGED AND RUBBING BRANCHES. 14. lANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE AND SUBMIT A WRITTEN REQUEST FOR Tl-lE SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION INSPECTION OF lANDSCAPE AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS PRIOR TO SUBMlmNG FINAL PAY REQUEST. 15. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE AND SUBMIT REPRODUCIBLE AS-BUILT DRAWING(S) OF LANDSCAPE INSTALlATION, IRRIGATION AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS UPON COMPLETlON OF CONSTRUCTION INSTALtATlON AND PRIOR TO SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION. GRADING NOTES 1. ROUGH GRADING AND FINISHED GRADING TO BE DONE BY OTl-lERS EXCEPT WHERE NOTED, GRADING UMITS ARE DEFINED AS THE JUNCTURE OF PROPOSED GRADE WITH EXISTING GRADE UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 3_ GRADING UMITS AND UMITS OF WORK SHOWN ON PLAN ARE ONLY APPROXIMATE AND MAY BE ADJUSTED IN F1ELD BY lANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. WORK OUTSIDE OF THESE LIMITS WILL BE OONEAT LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS EXPENSE UNLESS DIRECTED BY lANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR OWNER IN WRITING. 4. FILUCUT AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE A 1%%% MINIMUM GRADE AWAY FROM BUILDINGS WITHIN UMITS OF CONSTRUCTION. SCHEMA TIC LANDSCAPE PLAN 5. SALVAGE TOPSOIL FROM THE EAATHWORKAREASASAPPROPRIATE OR AS DIRECTED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND STOCKPILE FOR REUSE IN LOCATION APPROVED BY OWNER 6. MAINTAIN A UNIFORM GRADE BETWEEN CONTOURS IN AREAS TO BE GRADED UNLESS NOTED OTl-lERWlSE. ELEVATIONS, IF SHOWN ARE FINISHED ELEVATIONS. SPOT ELEVATIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER CONTOURS. 8. ADD EROSION CONTROL MEASURES IF GRADES GREATER THAN 3:1 OR IF CONDITIONS WARRANT. REFER TO MNDDT SPECIFICATIONS FOR EROSION CONTROL. 9. lANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT PUBUC UTILITIES FOR LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. lANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE Tl-lE ABOVE IF DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO ADDITIONAl. COST TO ruE OWNER 10. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PROPER EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS REQUIRED TO INSURE THAT EROSION IS KEPTTO AN ABSOLUTE MINIMUM. 11. PROVIDE TEMPORARY COVERING FOR CATCH BASINS AND MAN HOLES UNTIL FINISHED GRADING IS COMPLETE. 12 CONTRACTOR SHAlL CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE BASINS AS NEEDED. 13 PERIMETER SILT FENCE AND ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALl BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. REFER TO MNDDT SPECIFICATIONS FOR AGGREGATE BASE AND SILT FENCE. 14. CONTRACTOR SHAlL INSTALL CATCH BASIN EROSION CONTROL MEASURES PER MPCA (MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY) SPECS. 15. WITHIN TWO WEEKS OF RNISHED SITE GRADING, DISTURBED AREAS SfW.LBE STABILIZED WITH SEED, SOD, MULCH OR ROCK BASE. 16. CONTRACTORSHALl MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, INCLUDING Tl-lE REMOVAL OF ACCUMULATED SILT IN FRONT OF SILT FENCES AND EXCESS SEDIMENT IN PROPOSED CATCH BASINS, FOR THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION. 17. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SfW.L REMOVE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AFTER VEGETATION IS ESTABliSHED AND DISPOSE OF OFF SITE. PLANTING NOTES NO PLANTS WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL FINAL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS SEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. 2. PROPOSED PlANT MATERIAL SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CURRENT EDITION OF THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK, ANSl Z60,l, UNLESS NOTED OTl-lERWISE, DECIDUOUS SHRUBS SHAl.L HAVE ATlEAST 5 CANES AT THE SPECIFIED HEIGKT. ORNAMENTAL TREES SHALl HAVE NOV CROTCHES AND SHAll. BEGIN BRANCHING NO LOWER THAN 3' FEET ABOVE THE ROOT BALL. STREET #10 SOULEVARO TREES SfW.L BEGIN BRANCHING NO LOWER THAN 6' ABOVE PAVED SURFACE. 3. PlANT SYMBOLS ON PlAN DRAWiNG TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER PLANT SCHEDULE IF DISCREPANCIES IN QUANTITIES EXIST. SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER NOTES. 4. PROPOSED PLANT MATERIAl. SHALL BE LOCATED AND STAKED AS SHOWN ON PlAN. lANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST APPROVE STAKlNG OF PlANT MATERIAL PRIOR TO DIGGING. 5. NO PLANT MATERIAL SUBSTITUTIONS WILL BE ACCEPTED UNLESS APPROVAL IS GRANTED BY lliE lANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF BID. 6. ADJUSTMENTS IN LOCATION OF PROPOSED PlANT MATERIALS MAYBE NEEDED IN FIELD. LANDSCAPEARCI'lITECT MUST BE NOTIFIED PRIOR TO ADJUSTMENT OF PlANTS. 7. PLANT MATERIALS TO BE INSTALLED PERPlANTlNG DETAILS. 8. PlANT MATERIAL SfW..L BE FERTlUZEO UPON INSTALlATION WITH DRIED BONE MEAL, OTHER APPROVED FERTIUZER MIXED IN WITH THE PLANTlNG SOIL PER THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS OR MAY BE TREATED FOR SUMMER AND FAlL INSTALtATlON WITH AN APPlICATION OF GRANUlAR 1(}..O.5 OF 12 or. PER 2.5" CALIPER TREE AND 6 oz. PER SHRUB WITH AN ADDITIONAL APPLICATION OF 10-0-10 THE FOLLOWING SPRING IN Tl-lE TREE SAUCER. 9. PlANTING AREAS RECEIVING GROUND COVER, PERENNIALS, ANNUALS OR VINES SfW.L RECEIVE A MINIMUM OF 12" DEPTH OF PlANTING SOIL CONSISTING OF 45 PARTS TOPSOIL, 45 PARTS SCREENED COMPOST AND 10 PARTS SAND OR AS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 10 TREE WRAPPING MATERIAL SHALL BE TWO-WALLED PtASTIC SHEETING APPLIED FROM TRUNK FLARE TO FIRST BRANCH. WRAP SMOOTH-BARKED DECIDUOUS TREES PLANTED IN Tl-lE FAlL PRIOR TO DECEMBER 1 AND REMOVE WRAPPING AFTER MAY 1. 11, 3f16"THICKSTEa EDGER TO BE USED TO CONTAIN SHRUBS, PERENNIALS AND ANNUALS WHERE PlANTING BED MEETS SOD UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 12. ANNUAL AND PERENNIAL PlANTING BEDS TO RECEIVE 3' DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH Wlll-I NO WEED BARRIER. 13. SHRUB BED MASSINGS TO RECEIVE 4" OEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH Wlll-I FIBER MAT WEED BARRIER 14. CONIFEROUS TREES ARE TO RECEIVE 4' OEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH #10 SHALL HAVE NO MULCH IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH THE TREE TRUNK 15. MAINTENANCE STRIPS, WHERE ILLUSTRATED, TO HAVE EDGER AND MULCH AS INDICATED ON DRAWiNGS OR IN SPECIFICATIONS. 16. lANDSCAPE COmRACTORSHALL WARRANTY NEW PLANT MATERIAL THROUGH ONE CALENDAR YEAR FROM Tl-lE DATE OF SUBSTANllAL COMPLETION. NO PARTIAL ACCEPTANCE WILL BE CONSIDERED. 17. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, THE,APPROPRIATE OATES FOR SPRING PLANT MATERIAL INSTALlATION IS FROM THE TIME GROUND HAS THAWED TO JUNE 15. 16, CONIFEROUS PlANTING IS ACCEPTABLE FROMAUGUST15 TO OCTOBER 1. FALL DECIDUOUS PlANTING IS ACCEPTABLE FROM THE FIRST FROST UNTIL NOVEMBER 15. ADJUSThlENTS TO PlANTING DATES MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITlNG BY THE lANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, IRRIGATION NOTES 1. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHA1LBE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVlDING AN IRRIGATION tAYOUT PLAN AND SPECIFICATION AS PART OF lliE SCOPE OF WORK. SUBMIT lAYOUT PLAN AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR,APPROVAL BY THE lANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO ORDER AND/OR CONSTRUCTION. IT SHALL BE THE lANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO INSURE THAT SODDEOISEEDED AND PLANTED AREAS ARE IRRIGATED PROPERLY, INCLUDING Tl-lOSE AREAS OIRfClt Y AROUND AND ABlJTTING BUILDING fOUNDATION. 2. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORSHALl VERIFY (EXISTING) IRRIGATION SYSTEM tAYOUT ANDCONFIRM COMPLETE LIMITS OF IRRIGATION PRIOR TO SUPPLYING SHOP DRAWINGS. 3. LANDSCAPE CO~CTORSHALl PROViDE THE OWNER WITH AN IRRIGATION SCHEDULE APPROPRIATE TO THE PROJECT SITE CONDITIONS AND TO PLANTED MATERIAL GROWTH REQUIREMENTS. 4. lANDSCAPE CONTRACTORSHALL INSURE THAT SOIL CONDITIONS AND COMPACTION ARE ADEQUATE TO AlLOW FOR PROPER DRAINAGE AROUND THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. UNDESIRABLE CONDITIONS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO Tl-lE ATTENTION OF THE lANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO BEGINNING OF WORK IT SHALl BE THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO INSURE PROPER SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE IN PlANTING AREAS, TURF NOTES t SOD AREAS DISTURBED DUE TO GRADING UNLESS NOTED OTl-lERWISE. 2, WHERE SOD ABUTS PAVED SURFACES, FINISHED GRADE OF SODISEED SHALL BE HELD 1" BELOW SURFACE ELEVATION OFTRAlL, SLAB, CURB, ETC. SOD SHAlL BE LAID PARALLEL TO THE CONTOURSANDSfW.L HAVE STAGGERED JOlNT5. ON SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR IN DRAINAGE SWALES, SOD SHALL BE STAKED SECURELY, 4, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWlS~ THE,APPROPRlATE DATES FOR SPRING SEEO & SOD PlACEMENT IS FROM THE TIME GROUND HAS THAWED TO JUNE 15. 5. FALL SODDING IS GENERALLY ACCEPTABLE FROM AUGUST 15 TO NOVEMBER 1, FALL SEEOING IS GENERALLY ACCEPTABLE FROM AUGUST 15TO SEPTEMBER 15. ADJUSTMENTS TO SOD/SEED PLANTING DATES MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. PREPARE SOIL FOR THE ENTIRE BED NOTE: SEESPECIFICAT!ONSECTlON RElATED TO EXTERIOR PlANTING 3'MULCH. DO NOT PlACE MULCH IN CONTACT WITH PLANT STEM EDGE CONDITION VARIES, SEE PLAN EOGING,SEEPLAN CONmNERG~~MATE~SHAlL HAVE ROOTS HAND LOOSENED PlANTING SOIL FOR PERENNIALS SCARlFYSIDES AHD BOTTOM OF ENTIRE BED WITH SPADE BY HAND TO BINO WlTl-l PlANTING SOIL UNDISTlJRBEDSUBGRADE 1 l100 PERENNIAL PlANTING DETAIL SCALE:314'.l'.{I' ?l.NmNGDETIlJ '/C<",,-,;}WG 2 L100 SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL NOTE: SEE SPECIFICATION SECTION RELATED TO EXTERIOR PLANTING 3'MULCH. DONOTPlACEMULCH IN CONTACT WlTH SHRUB STEM WEED BARRIER FABRIC EDGE CONDITION VARIES, SEE PLAN EDGING,SEEPLAN CONTAINER GROWN MATERlALSHALL HAVE ROOTS HAND LOOSENED PlANTINGSOILFORSHRUBS MIN. 4" DEEPER THAN ROOT BALL ___., ._____" ,__ SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF . C:,R(-- ~~~~Ne::ITH~U:~i:~~D ~UNDISTlJRBEDSUBGRADE SCAlE,3{.\"l'.{I' r';_~N UK: D~Tf"L.' Sfl'1;"~.[)WG 4' ORGANIC MULCH, DO NOT PLACE MULCH IN CONTACT WITH TREE TRUNK. 4" BUILT-UP EARTl-l SAUCER BEYOND EDGE OF ROOT BALL EDGE CONDITION VARIES,SEEPlAN COMPACT PLANTING SOIL TO 85 PERCENT OFMAXlMUMORYUNIT WEIGHT ACCORDING TOASTMD698 NOTE: CONTRACTOR SfW.L BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING TREES IN APLUMB POSITION Tl-lROUGHOUT THE WARRANTY PERIOD. WRAP TREE TRUNKS ONLY UPON ,APPROVAL BY lANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, SEE SPECIFICATION SECTION RELATED TO EXTERIOR PLANTING EACH TREE SHALL BE P!ANTED SUCH THAT THE ROOT FtARE IS VlSIBLE AT THETOPOFTl-lERooTBALL IF THE ROOT FlARE IS NOT VISIBLE, THE SOIL SHALL BE REMOVED IN A LEVEL MANNER FROM Tl-lE ROOT BALL TO WHERE THE FIRST MAIN ORDER ROOT (ii" DIA. OR lARGER) EMERGES FROM THE TRUNK. SET MAIN ORDER ROOT 1" HIGHER THAN AOJACENTGRADE.DONOTCOVERTOP OF ROOT BALL WITH SOIL. 6'MIN_DIAMETERMULCHRING ):~0~ >-'-",-:'<( UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE --:'".'",')~ DIGPlANTINGPIT4"T06"------"'~ DEEPER THAN ROOT BAlL REMOVE BURlAP, TWiNE, ROPE AND WIRE FROM TOP HALF OF ROOT BALL SCARIFY SIDES OF TREE PIT WITH SPADE BY HAND TO BINDWlTHPREPAREDSOIL PlANTING PITTO BE TWO TO FIVE TIMES THE DIAMETER OF ROOT BAlL, SLOPED TAMP SOil AROUND ROOT BAlL BASE FIRMLY WiTH FOOT PRESSURE SO THATRODTBALLDOESNOTSHIFT PLACE RDOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED OR COMPACTED SOIL ~ TREE PLANTING DETAIL SCAI.E:1I2'"l'.{I' "C-'-",,,U','Tf.- ")1';' PLANTING DETAILS POPEASSO(IATEsINc' 1255ENERGVPARKDKlVE ST.PAUL,MNs5,oa.SEI& PH.{G51;G42.g200 FAX{('>1)6~.-"o; ARDEN HILLS PLAZA ARDEN HILLS, MN CITY SUBMITTAL LANDSCAPE NOTES & DETAILS -._rrm.: ISSUED R€ISSUED 511l112D07 8m112007 ...~ito., ... .... '6226-07012 " SHEET L200 Attachment 3E-3 Revised Sheets A3.1 and A3.4 ~ ~HILLS September 5, 2007, Planning Commission Meeting J 1I1...1......a:t:\J&~.*"(j;lHA'MRI.AI", FACE BRICK III , I'Wf.FAC1lI<5R, COI.OR, "m, GlCIi&5Rl~co. TANGElQE YaOlF!; lUliiSaJT UllLITY \ J FACe~II;l, TO MATCW efiijQ{aIl EXI&TlttS mAll.. allLDN!! I<OCXFACE otl"l , 1'W<I'AC1\RR, COI.OR, &lZE, NORlIf'laDBl..OC:Kco. &TANDAflD "21 OR "20& ~NALI6'~xe'lolIGI-I 5HOOTW FACE MA'lFACtlRD LtlE6TaE , I"Wf.FAClIRR , IitXXCA6T COl.CR, el.I'FSTGtE l"WIFACTIRIi, carntelTAL &Tct€ COl.CR. I\ZI& &IZE, 3'I8'X II 518'X 23518' v ~ m m o ~ o , ~ CO ~ ""AI. CN PARART Il.lA.U. .~I~~~ """""ACE I1JKFACll.OOP LtE&TaE ALlI1nII1"""" "."" PACE eRICK "I ~J~~ 6TAWtri6EAM ""AI._ ALlI1nII1"""" ."''''' AJ..Lt1NI1eTORErR:lNT ENIMa 6T6TS'1 ~~Fl.OOR NORTH ELEVATION 1/16"=1'-0" C~NaTl=, ~TOPI.tIIT8TOSE ~~lUOOO/f'LA&TICI VIlfT'LPA/NTEDTOMA,Tcu. ~ m m o ~ o , ~ co l \0 ,..,... 6TAl-ON:rleEAH ""AI._ SOUTH ELEVATION 1/16"=1 '-0" ""AI. ....... aI1PARAI'ETUWJ. """""ACE MANFAC1IlIlEP us"", ALlt1NI1 WNX>U ."''''' &l::';HAJ>ElEYctlD FACE MICK 'I ~FA::eCMJ'l ~ m m o ~ o , ~ CO ~ := s -",p~" ! ~ , FlNIHD~ v ~ m m o ~ o I ~ CO ~ ,..,... 136'-6' o 8' 1.- 32' I := 16' eulLDN:i eEYONP 32' 1.- I'ETALFI.A5I-lN::il CNP~WAlJ. ""AI. ....... aIlPAfi'AF'ETWAlJ. - TOP-CfP~f. """""ACE MANFAC1IlIlEP LIl'eTGN: ALlt1NI1 WNX>U ."''''' FACE6RlCK'l ~-----TOP"'.:i~ TIK>N:i6E.41 l'ETAL,<!lU.ItG ALlI1nII1 WNX>U 6Y6TEH """""ACE MANFAC1IlIlEP LHE&TctE FACE flRlCK " ALLt1lNJ"l &TOFS'AONT ENTRAla 6Y&TEI1 -FNI!I.ED~~ EAST ELEVATION 1/16"=1'-0" 1"5'-10' o 8' 1.- 16' 32' 32' ~~ P,t!Q:6RlCK" TOpGfP~ FRONT TOWER ELEVATION 1/16"=1 '-0" o ~- 8' 16' '@ m g: 1 ; A3.1 WEST ELEVATION 1/16"=1'-0" 8' 16' 32' o .... POPE ASSOCIATES INC. 1255 ENERGY PARK DRIVE ST. PAUL, MN 55108-5118 PH. (651) 642-9200 FAX (651) 642-1101 o~ [Q)~~~D:@ ......",-<::;; properties ARDEN PLAZA ARDEN HillS, MN CITY SUBMITTAL BUILDING "A" ELEVATION !s%es on~ Reiisions: CITY SUBMITTAL CITY SUBMITTAL CITY SUBMITTAL 07/02107 08/20/07 08/27/07 : ferebl mtilllholl~i$,I(Jl,l,!~iliCQliC<l,CI :~~:::i~~'~iDl~~lll : :1 d:~[i~ln~;:lt' !rt"'led under I~e InIS QI lole If ~"nellla rOlR.1'ope Lio.lI>, I~I ~,I, 01/fa1 C~issionNo. J!GfnOY ChedeuOi 16226-07012 TS.KH RP SHEET All I BUILDING "A" SIGNAGE 0 1. BUILDING "A" NE ELEVATION A3.4 0 ". ". ". 0 ......- ....- , 15 BUILDING "A" WEST ELEVATION ~ A3.4 " ". ,,' ---- , l 14 s A3.4 BUILDING "A" SOUTH ELEVATION o 16' 32' M' '--- ' [7- - r BUILDING "A" NORTH ELEVATION o 10' 32' 64' ~- - 01] 12 A3.4 BUILDING "A" EAST ELEVATION o 16' 32' 64' '-- WAll MOUNTED SIGNS ~~,~~ 51GtlAliEA. ~3J; SF 'T11}."d/7"'AA~A 11 <. 66.l~SFI ~--'""'" SIGNAREA.11h1SF ~ ~H;;'oI ;~~.llhS<' I2X.lnfIFl ~ II-1HA~.~A{;yl ;:~~A.19jSF 11><.,61&;,) TOTAlWAI1516N!;~ 6ASTWALL, 63$51' NORTllUlALL, 63$$1' ~TWALL. 11M51' 5OJTI.IWALL, (j)$,)SF WINDOW SIGNS r'"-1 to ,~~ SIGNAREA.r"JSF (4X.40.4SFJ TOTAlWlNn<:JW~r"',N5PRQp()= EAST WALL , 1"1 SF NORIi-lWALL 101 SF GRAPI:!ICS {S~ ~~5IGNAREA,y';JSF TOTAL GRAPliICS PROPOSED NORTH EAST IllALL 05JSF AUXILIARY SIGNS r<-1 {~ ;:~.&~SF r<-1 [11E)(1Y1;:~'f>g)S!' TOTAl AlIXIlIARYSI(,NSPR()F'o.ifi:Q NORTI-1I11ALL 5O\JrnI11ALL, 61') SF on L BUILDING "B" SIGNAGE 11 A3.4 BUILDING "B" SOUTH ELEVATION o 16" 32' 64' --- ~ 10 BUILDING "B" EAST ELEVATION A3.4 o 16" --.-- ". -' ~ 9 A3.4 BUILDING "B" NORTH ELEVATION o 16' 32' 64' Iol"'_ ' JF~ I BUILDING "B" WEST ELEVATION 8 A3.4 WAll MOUNTED SIGNS ~ ,~" I ,~,~,.~,~ OX.loW.1SFi ;[1 SIGNSl SIGI<AI<EA.n,lSf (JX.45ASFI Tr'lTAl WAif Sk'.NSPRt"JPOSFD EASTIllAl.L "".9 SF NORTI-lWAl.L €oSloSf' ~STUlALL 69hSF 5Olffi.IIlIAlL !/J/l)SF o 16' .....- ,,' BUILDING "C" SIGNAGE II 1 BUILDING "C" WEST ELEVATION ,,' , 5 " A3.4 ". 7 A3.4 o 16' )2' ............ . A3.4 U BUILDING "C" SOUTH ELEVATION o 16' )2' 64' 10.1"'_ u U BUILDING "C" EAST ELEVATION o 16' )2' ~- ~ I BUILDING "C" NORTH ELEVATION 4 A3.4 o 16' )2' .....- WAll MOUNTED SIGNS {i 51('d',[CJ 5I<>NAREA,405F 14X,1605FI TOTALWALLsl('d',[sF'I1o."OSEO EA$TUJALL WJi'l5F NORTIlUJALL. r/l)J!)5F IlCSTUJALL, I?JJlJ5F ~ti1OJ..L. 0JlJ$ ,,' MONUMENT SIGNS W'.0' " ~! ARDEN PLAZA TENANT NAME TENANTNAME TENANTNAME TENANT NAME TENANT NAME TENANT NAME ~'.0' FREfAllIaCATEDMETAI. FI.A5IlINGTO MATOl EllJILDIIG rmm.JALLTILLIJ'lINATi:D S!GN 1100 $} SMOOTH FACE CAST STalE' TOHATa-IOOl..DtNG fACEeRlCK '2 TOr-t.\TC~ "'"'~ ROCK FACE CMJ TO MATCH EI<lILDING ""'" CONCl<ETE6Loa: L_L.,_____~~FO.N:>ATIa.t [__-.J_____L__ I~ MONUMENT SIGN "C" (ALONG LEXI~~O~AVE.l ,,' ". '~ ~ A3.4 1 ~ A3.4 j"'14 ~I ~i I! , t- I" I'! )'.I?J' W-0' 8'.8' . FREFAllRlCATEDMETAI. FlA5HN:>TOr-t.\TCH OOl..D1NG ,. .... HA~A1. ~ca>T mJ5FI SMOOTl-IFACECAST5TONE TOMATCHEI<lILDI~ s . !!! ":' . INTERNALLTILW'1INATED S: 5!GNIl!'3.'1SFI " , :r.I?J' 8'-8' )'.19' FACESRlCK'2 TO HATa-I E\lJILDING I<CICKFACECHJTOMATCH E\lJILDIl>t; """" I I 1~~CtlEll.CICK [==:J====C:==J MONUMENT SIGN "B" (AT THE INTERSECTION OF COUNTY ROAD E AND LEXINGTON AVENUE) W'-I?J- . " e , ,. ARDEN PLAZA lENANTNAME lENANTNAME lENANT NAME lENANT NAME TENANT NAME TENANT NAME ~ 9 o , , ;'-0' W-I?J' ;'-0' o 2' ~ ~ 101"_ FREFA6RlCATEDMETAI. FLASHtNGTO HATOl E\lJILDING INTERNALLTILLUHNAlED S!GNlIOOSFJ SMOOl~ FACE CA$T 5TONE TOMATCHE\lJILDIN::> FACE6RlCK 'I TO MATCH BUILDING- ROCKFACECMJ10MATCI< E\lJIWIIG c.RADE CONCRETESLoa: ~L-L.,--__-~ ~FO.mAT[Ctl L__-.J_____L__J MONUMENT SIGN "A" ALONG COUNTY ROADJ~l o 2' 4' B ......- POPEAssOCIATESINC '~SSENERGVPARKDRIVE ST.PAUL,MNsSIOS.S1I6 PH'{"'siJ...~~.noo FAX["'51l~J-UOI ~!Q)~~~ -Oo<7l>'OP<H1le$ ARDEN PLAZA ARDEN HillS, MN CITY SUBMITTAL SIGNAGE b~~llIIlllili",: CITY SUBMITTAL CIlYSUBMlTTAL CIlYSUBMlTTAL 07102lJ7 ~, 0lJ/27fJ7 I '''''Iwlilflblll~is pllll,lpltifi,Q\ion,I' ;,r.:~i::;.t~lQ~h~l;r: ~ :t[i~~;;I(( !J",;II(IQ!~,!belll,.1 (Q\e,fii=Qlt 1>1~,~ [k.lI>, l~l ",",,,;,,,I\l 16226-<17012 ~ KHTS Che<Udbr RP SHEET A3.4 ~ Attachment 3E-4 Potential Alternative Site Plan ~ ~HILLS September 5, 2007, Planning Commission Meeting For d'5Cu~$/'c'l GYllf -~- ~ ~""-6- ~ _';):<5.._ ______n'.________.. ___..o______n__ m_ COUNTY ROADE ----,"-""~"""~. =~ -_/ " :;o,,'''''''~:;:''_'''''.~_.~, ---.....,.......,-~--,..--_.. ~---.~-~~'~~_::__=_~:_:--~~~b',~.~--=--~..- ,f;'..", ~,...,-,-~~, ,r--" Ln' ,,_i< I" ,c;e_.c_>~'-:( ,:::;.=---_--.1. ~~~., 'C-~' -~:,-,:L:h,,,,'_, - ---,,~,,-;,-:;:-""""~ - 'i;i- ."-, I [XISTlNG BUILDING I ,0C2~~L ,--~ ,~"",,o-".,,,,~ . '--o';..::."-~~-""'r-~--- - ;:~~~~,;:.; r- -" " (] FrN'SHEDFLOORUEV~TtON , l-;~ ::; I ,,_n -3n- ~~~}~ _ k &'.;;;- [~ PROPOSED BUILDING "A" RETAIL 14,490S.F -,,; I r--It l__I, I , , r-l i. ~ Ie r-, /m L.L "i'l I i m;u I ~"'" 'e~, .~~< - 61 ! ~~ "\~~J--+- -~-i"U' I &. 2&.?~>" --;;;;:~t~j1-" I ~~3:J---C--- \ __;..i,:.=.\._: POTENTlA.L I 1 OUTD~,;'T~~ROEN "~j 7656SF .,1 2 e: ~~~fl~~;~_~(Kl,", "- "~ -~--"--~----- ~ ~,~ -~- --- -- -- , + r ..~. ",-,,< -/ .0 i ": I '_;' ,,::! ?:;;~:" i I;-~' -~--'\ rr,\H~~;~~;)/ .-c.. ~-:o c::. ___~,",."""./." / --,,,-''C''",,---- :n : -- ___..____n." ,.'l ~ ~ , I "--,,, " --.i_D.i.~",--- '._'.1 "",~~~'" ..1 I , f' -I i , , " r- : , i', , '?' IL~!!~-i~F-=~=!~2~~~}~~ +-_______0--______ B,:U'J;'''' :_m _=~:~ nJ ;:;! i:" ~;~-'- -1'~ ~~ ' , d ~;:L/S';';~:~~,";i i 7"~ 'd ~y L "' !,\ ' ---~~ I \1 il. k\ I \'1' CI'"''''cDFlOORH.t\t,~TID''' '39_00 I 1, I I H ~ I ,,"'_Z' L f'\' :__=JJ-jr~" , ' )' .,'_"____'v;,,___;___slt>~: ~"",..,,,, ''''' -~- ",';-',~ ~ ~~,;~-~' - ~---..-"-",-,-",, ~ ~ ---.... ,.,;' ".__.,-,-~ :;""~;:'~:;':;>" .. "\ -----'-- ....-...., I ----......., " I i )--...; ,^ ; '1J ,"_J PROPOSED BUILDING "8" RETAIL 16.230S_F L_~__ \, \ EX1ST1NG POND ''''','~- , @~RC_HJI~_gTU RA1__~~_ITf::__E'=t.N A1,1 1"=100'-0" 0 _ =:0 . 1o?i DRAFT .'-",.1, , , '" ,,;',; , i ,! I W :::J Z W > <( Z o l- e> Z X W ..J i i I i \ I I I I I- I \JD , i\ \..j- Attachment 3E-S Public Comments/Letters ~ ~HlLLS September 5, 2007, Planning Commission Meeting Page J of 1 James Lehnhoff From: Elam Noor [elamnr@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 20075:28 PM To: holdenbj24@aol.com; James Lehnhoff; FranH116@aol.com; David_Grant; sjharpstead@comcast.net; davemcclung@comcast.net Subject: CVS and Aldi Proposal on Lex. and County E Good Afternoon, The Council will be hearing arguments for and against the proposal to build a CYS phamlacy and an Aldi grocery store on the comer of Lexington and County Road E. I noticed on a visit to Ace Hardware on that corner that the company has organized a petition to block this new construction citing loss of parking space as a primary reason. With all due respect to Ace Hardware, where] do shop; the loss of some parking space is hardly worth blocking the extra traffic they would see with the addition of a pharmacy and discount grocery store. Currently Ace is located close to office buildings, a few restaurants and a tanning salon. One need not think to hard to imagine the increase in traffic they would see if people are already doing their pharmacy and grocery shopping near-by. I understand that Ace has been in that area for 33 years, and I understand that change is sometimes frustrating; but everyone in our area will see benefit tram this new project including Ace. Thank You for your time. Elam Noar Realtor Keller Williams Premier Realty 4 Pine Tree Drive Arden Hills, MN 551 ] 2 8/29/2007 July 27,2007 James Lehnhoff, City Planner City of Arden Hills Arden Hills City Hall 1245 W. Highway 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112 Dear Mr. Lehnhoff: I am writing in regard to the proposed redevelopment of Arden Plaza. I am very much against the project if it means a new drugstore on the comer of Lexington and County Road E. Arden Pharmacy and Gift store has been in business for many, many years and has been a valued member of the community. The customer service is outstanding with great and courteous personnel. Why would the Planning Commission grant the requ~st to the detriment of an already existing business? We need to protect and preserve privately owned businesses and not allow big box stores to take them away. I don't believe the demographics of the area show any need for another dntgstore in the community when there are pharmacies at both CUB and Target Greatland in addition to Arden Pharmacy. The same holds true for adding another grocery store when we have CUB and Target only a half-mile away. I urge the Planning Commission to refuse permission for this redevelopment which would be a disservice to the community. Sincerely, ~_U:/,;;? Ste}lflanie A. Mann ~. 868 Cobb Road Shoreview, MN 55126 Page] of] James Lehnhoff From: Rachel Cain [cain01234@yahoo.comj Sent: Tuesday, July 31,20073:25 PM To: James Lehnhoff Subject: PC # 07 -018 Hello, I am writing to strongly protest the above project, 'development' of Arden Plaza.! do not want to see our community businesses go out ofbusiness! I There are plenty of Walmarts and discount dmg stores already, including the SuperTargetjust up the street. Our community does not need another such store/stores'!'! I live in Shoreview and work right across the street from Arden Plaza and frequent both Ace Hardware and Arden Pharmacy at least once/week!! Thank you for your time and consideration'] Rachel Cain Ready for the edge of your seat? Che.ck out tonight's top picks on Yahoo! TV_ 8/29/2007 Page 1 of2 James Lehnhoff From: Jennifer81989@aol.com Sent: Tuesday, July 31,20073:32 PM To: James Lehnhoff Subject: INPUT ON PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT OF ARDEN PLAZA CORRIDOR July 31,2007 Dear Mr. James Lehnhoff, It has come to my attention that the corner of Lexington and Cty Road E (#07-018) is under consideration for a proposed redevelopment. I am a resident of Shoreview, but frequent Arden Hills businesses in the proposal. I will nol be able to attend your August 1st Meeting. Your notice to residents ofthe area misses most of the area businesses because they have a rental agreement. It is not a residential area. I heard about the change as I was picking up prescriptions at Arden Pharmacy this afternoon. t am extremely disturbed by this proposal. Please consider your decision wisely. Concerns of mine and many other area residents are: 1. Traffic is already horrendous in this area. That intersection to be exact. 2. Safety is a big concern. Accident corridor. Personally witnessed many accidents. 3. Service redundancy. A Walgreen's is not needed at this corner. Cub Pharmacy is down Lexington. 1/2 block Arden Pharmacy and Gift are in location. Too many pharmacies in close proximity to your proposal are NOT NEEDED. 4. Small businesses are the bread and butter of this country and state. Don't perpetuate the takeover by big business. 5. Arden Hills is a small town and why residents love the area. Please don't loose site of that appeal. A city's planning commission and mission are to help provide a livable city through their decisions. You will affect many needed services and businesses in that area. Very few gift shops of any caliber exist in the Shoreview, Arden and North Oaks area. Besides the pharmacy needs. Restaurants are few and sparse. Great Wall is one of our favorites. You have that in Arden Plaza Pharmacy. Besides taking away parking space and many of the area businesses that are frequented, you are taking away the livelihoods of many core businesses which your city has been built on. A WALGREENS IS NOT NEEDED. PLEASE DON'T MAKE THE SAME MtSTAKE THAT SHOREVIEW DID BY TAKING AWAY THE ONLY CAR WASH IN OUR CORRIDOR! Please think of what is really needed by your constituents instead of the almighty tax dollar. I am against this proposal and anything similar. I have been a resident of this area for 49 years and have frequented these businesses for that many years. Thank you for listening to my concerns. Sincerely, Mary Hagerman Shoreview Resident and Arden Hills consumer Jennifer81989@aol.com 651-780-5663 8/29/2007 Page I of I James Lehnhoff From: Elaine McGillivray [emcgill@comcast.netj Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 9:31 PM To: James Lehnhoff Subject: Aldi's & Walgreens Hello, I could not find the e-mail addresses of the Planning Commission members so I am sending this to you. Please forward (or give copies) to the members. I learned today that Arden Hills is considering having an Aldi's and a Walgreens come into Arden Plaza. I was amazed that the city would consider this when we have a locally owned, independent pharmacy at that location and two other Big Box stores with grocery stores and pharmacies (Cub and Target) a stone's throwaway. It seems to me the last thing we need is another grocery store and another pharmacy thai would surely cause the closing of Arden Pharmacy. What is Arden Hills thinking? We moved to Arden Hills in 1980 when it was still considered a "village". Granted, at that time we could hardly find a grocery store nearby. But with the Rainbow in Shoreview, the Fresh and Natural Foods in Shore view, the Super Target in Shoreview, the Cub in Arden Hills, and the Byerly's in Roseville; we are inundated with grocery stores and have more than enough pharmacies_ I can't imagine the owners of the shopping center have done a correct demographic study if they think this area can really support another grocery store and pharmacy. Arden Hills really has no downtown. Why not invite some more specialty stores to come to Arden Plaza or a good restaurant? Why not create an area with some ambiance with some trees and an outdoor cafe? If you really think we need another grocery store, why not a specialty store like Trader Joe's? My neighbors and I drive to Maple Grove or SI. Louis Park to shop there. Most of my neighbors have never heard of Aldi's. And, most of us agree we would boycott a Walgreens if it drives Arden Pharmacy out of its Arden Hills location. Please consider the impact on our community, as you weigh this decision. Do we really want another Big Box wasteland in Arden Hills (think old Highway 10 in Mounds View) with its parade of Walgreen's, CVS, Snyder's, and strip malls. can't imagine this is what Arden Hills wants for its future. Thank you for your consideration. Elaine McGillivray 1270 NurseryHill Court Arden Hills, MN 8/29/2007 Page 1 of 1 James Lehnhoff From: Michele [slomo@usfamily.net] Sent: Tuesday, July 31,20076:40 PM To: James Lehnhoff Subject: Proposed Redevelopment at County Road E and Lexington-Input to Planning Commission Dear Mr. Lehnhoff: I am writing you in opposition to the proposed redevelopment project al County Road E and Lexington. I just learned about the proposed redevelopment and the planning commission meeting this afternoon from a neighbor. First, I am upset that the city did such a poor job of letting the public know that the planning commission was going to meet tomorrow evening regarding this proposed redevelopment and informing city residents about the content of Ihe proposed redevelopment. The lack of publicity makes me wonder whether the city and developers do not want to hear the residents' views, and just want to push the project approvals through quickly without opposition. Not a very transparent or objective process??? Second, I am opposed to the spedfic uses that are apparently being proposed for the redevelopment There is no need to build a Walgreens_ We already have Target and Cub pharmacies as large pharmacies very close by, and another Walgreens at Snelling and County Road C. I appreciate the neighborhood's long time business, the Arden Plaza Pharmacy, and the personal service it provides. If the city allows a Walgreens to be constructed. it surely will be the end of the Arden Plaza Pharmacy, plus another drug store is not needed in Ihis part of the city. Next, I am opposed to another grocery slore. We already have two very close by (Target and Cub), and Byerly's not far away. If the city decides to allow any kind of small grocery store in this redevelopment, I oppose an Aldl store. I have been in Aldi stores and they are definitely geared toward "lower end" consumers. I understand that the same company that owns Aldi's also owns the Trader Joe's stores. If the planning commission/city decides to proceed with a redevelopment at this intersection, it makes MUCH more sense to put in a Trader Joe's than an Aldi's. I love Trader Joe's, as do most people I know, and it would do a terrific business in this neighborhood, as the nearest ones are currently in Maple Grove and St Louis Park. Trader Joe's are reasonably priced, fun places to shop. Also, I oppose the idea of getting rid of the Holiday Inn and putting in more senior housing (although I am close to "senior" status myself). The Holiday Inn has proved to be very convenient for visitors in my family. Also, this intersection seems much more appropriate for retail space than for senior housing. For seniors who can't drive, it is a location that has skimpy (at best) bus service and a busy intersection that is not pedestrian friendly and would be noisy for residents To summarize, I think the current uses of this property are just fine. They are small scale and compatible with the neighborhoods near by. I don't think the planning commission or residents would be doing any service to the city by approving the proposed development It duplicates retail offerings already in the neighborhood and the senior housing does not seem appropriately located al this busy intersection. It would probably force out of business a long time locally owned pharmacy. Most importantly, this proposed redevelopment would attract even more traffic to County Road E and Lexington, which is already getting more clogged up by the day (aside from the construction season) If somehow the city decides to proceed with some kind of redevelopment, I think it should work to get a Trader Joe's store instead of Aldi's and some other type of business besides a Walgreens. How about a restaurant that sells something other than pizza and subs???? How about an ice cream store like Cold Stone Creamery? These are retail uses that would enhance the neighborhood, rather than duplicating existing nearby businesses. Thank you for passing these comments on to the planning commission and city counciL Respectfully submitted, Michele Owen 1428 Arden Oaks Court Arden Hills _h USFamily,Net - $8.25/mo! -- Highspeed - $19.99/mo! m 8/29/2007 Page I of I James Lehnhoff From: Steve [pimwee@mac.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 01,20073:12 PM To: James Lehnhoff Subject: Arden Plaza redevelopment Dear James, I am writing to express my opposition to the redevelopment proposal for Arden Plaza. In a neighborhood which already has big box stores like Target and Cub, we do not need a large Walgreens added to the mix. Arden Plaza Pharmacy, a small independent retailer, and Ace Hardware, already serve our needs. We have been customers of Arden Plaza Pharmacy for over 30 years. They have provided excellent service, and they have thousands ofloyal customers. We appreciate the neighborly and friendly service, which is not what we would expect in a Walgreens. Please, do not drive a successful business out of Arden Hills just because of a greedy landlord. Neighborhood values are important, and Arden Plaza already has the right mix of businesses which are appropriate for our "downtown.f! The last thing we need in Arden Plaza is Aldi's Discount Grocery. Better known as a "ghetto grocery," Aldi's will make Arden Plaza a very undesirable shopping location. We have lived in this immediate area since 1969, and the civic improvements on Lexington and E over the years have generally been proper and successful. The current proposal for Arden Plaza's redevelopment does not fit in with this pattern of success. Please reject the Arden Plaza landlord's proposal. Thank you, Steve and Marcia Schultz 1127 Amble Drive Arden Hills 651-631-2059 PS: Arden Hills will be making some major retail decisions as TCAPP development gets underway. The town center in TCAPP would be a good place for a Walgreens, not in Arden Plaza where you would be driving out a loyal and successful business. 8/29/2007 Page 1 of 1 James Lehnhoff From: Lyle Steinfeldt ~ylestein@msn.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 20074:28 PM To: sjharpstead@comcast.net; David_Grant; James Lehnhoff; franh116@aol.com; davemcclung@comcast.net; holdenbj24@aol.com Subject: Planning proposal Dear Mayor and Council Members, I learned about proposed changes to Arden Plaza area today. I am opposed to putting in a CVS Pharmacy in the complex. I think we have enough CVS and Walgreens Pharmacy operations in the area. They don't seem to be content until they have one every 5 miles from one another. There is only one Arden Plaza Pharmacy. I use it frequently for mailing letters and packages, selecting greeting cards, and the purchase of decorative items. I like the pleasant friendly atmosphere there. I will not get that same kind of treatment at a CVS. I only go to them as a last resort. That building along with other proposed buildings seem to cramp the space of that area and detract from the appeal of the present stores. In the case of Ace Hardware, it will severely curtail their plant and Christmas tree space and make it more difficult for people to spot their location. I also question the value of bringing in an ALDI's store. I don't think their type of customer comes from suburbs like Arden Hills, Shoreview, and Roseville. I hope the planning meeting goes well and you have some good discussion. Lyle Steinfeldt 4430 Arden View Ct. Arden Hills, MN 55112 8/29/2007 3090 N. LEXINGTON AVENUE ROSEVILLE MN 55113 AUGUST 1, 2007 Planning Commission City of Arden Hills 1245 West Highway 96 Arden Hills MN 55112 Re: Plan for adding to Arden Plaza We do not live in Arden Hills, but just across the line into Roseville. We have, for years, shopped at Arden Plaza, and are appalled that you want to bring in an Aldi's and a Walgreens or CVA pharmacy. You already have a pharmacy which is trusted and loved by the customers. We feel like family when we go in there to get our prescriptions filled. Why you would want to add a new pharmacy is a mystery to us. There are three Walgreens in Roseville, and the Cub and Target stores just a couple blocks north of Arden Plaza. How many pharmacies do you think we need? The same is true of grocery stores, with the Cub and Target stores just north of Arden Plaza, another Cub at Har Mar, Byerly's on Snelling, and the Rainbow on Larpenteur plus the Aldi's on Rice just a few blocks away. There is already too much traffic on Lexington. Adding those stores will just add more cars and congestion. We do not plan to shop at either of those stores if you go ahead with your plan. Haven't you ever heard "if it ain't broke, don't fix it." Arden Hills is a charming city the way it is. Please keep it that way. Sincerely yours, J)JL~ jr~~-7 Lee Sperling Norma Hunter c:Mayor's office City Council Page 1 of 1 James Lehnhoff ~~"""""--~~"""C""'~~-"'''''fr "'~"""_""'__~~~_~'^"""'''~^'~'~'.._.'' ...._,_.._...,w'_.,_._~.. From: MLKlinkhammer@aol.com Wednesday, August 01,20074:19 PM James Lehnhoff; sjharpstead@comcast.net;David_Grant; Holdenbj24@aoLcom; FranH116@aoLcom; davemcclung@comcast.net Subject: Walgreens Sent: To: We have been customers of the Arden Plaza Pharmacy since it first opened. We have always had fantastic service and have enjoyed the feeling of a small town pharmacy where the pharmacisls take a personal interest in each of their customers. When a friend was dying of cancer and needed many medications, Arden Plaza Pharmacy had the most competitive prices and whoever was behind the counter always asked how Kathy was doing. We want you to do NOTHING that will jeopardize this neighborhood drug store. We refuse to shop at the chains such as CVS and Walgreens and will instead drive miles if needed to support the local merchants. Mary Lou and Roger Klinkhammer 1015 Island Lake Avenue 651-484-4250 Get a sneak peek of the all-new AQ1.c!'9/Il. 8/29/2007 Page 1 of 1 James Lehnhoff From: richwilson1234@comcast.net Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 20079:52 AM To: James Lehnhoff Subject: Message for Arden Hills Planning Commission Members Dear Mr. Lehnhoff: Please forward this email to members of the Ardcn Hills Planning Commission. Thank you, Richard R. Wilson, MD To: Arden Hills Planning Commission From: Richard R. Wilson MD, along with my wife, Louise M. Wilson, PhD (22 year residents at 1276 Nursery Hill Lane, Arden Hills, MN 55112) Dear members: Pleasc reconsidcr and then rejcct the proposal to add an Aldi's and a Walgreen's to the ever expanding footprints of "big box" retail locations in Arden Hills. We already have many options for chain grocery stores and chain pharmacies. We also have plenty of options for chain fast food and chain. . . fill in other retail sectors. In fact, the two latest proposed additions may further compromise some of the independent retail locations that we thankfully do have, such as the excellent Arden Phatmacy in Arden Plaza_ Please consider the more attractive (literally) option of fostering non-chain, specialty stores. We have loved our 22 years in Arden Hills. Thank you, Rich Wilson Cell phone: (65]) 260-8042 8/29/2007 James Lehnhoff From: Sent: To: Subject: Nina Mayfield [nina.m@earthlink.net] Thursday, August 02, 20072:58 PM James Lehnhoff; Sjharpstead@comcast.net; David_Grant proposed walgreens Today when I rode my bike up to the pharmacy i was greeted with some very disturbing news. Walgreens on the corner? That is just ridiculous. We have a Target and a Cub both with pharmacies 2 blocks away. I hope that you guys aren't just thinking about revenues at the expense of people. I am a long time resident of the south end of Shoreview. I have used Arden Plaza Pharmacy for 15-20 years. I have tried using the big box stores and I feel like just a number, i don't get the service or kindness and have been treated rudely at Target Pharmacy. I love that I can go into Arden Pharmacy and they know me, and most of there other customers too!!! Please do not do to them what the CVS or1 Grand did to the sister pharmacy there (Bober Drugs) I work on Grand ave and we really miss Bober Drugs!!! There are people that work at the pharmacy that will be to find a full-time job at a living wage with benefits_ believe that the city leaders would approve of that. hard pressed I can not Sincerely: Nina ]\Jayfield From: Sent: To: Subject: Claudia Munson [munson@stodilia.org] Thursday, August 02, 2007 10:42 AM James Lehnhoff proposed building James Lehnhoff Dear Mr. Lehnhoff, My family and I have been residents of Arden Hills for over thirty years. When looking for a home and a community to call home we were pleased to discover Arden Hills. We have been blessed with a true community - great neaighbors who look out for each other, wonderful business owners who know us by name and treat us like family, schools that nurture and encourage our children to be responsible citizens, and city planners and council members who are as concerned we are that Arden hills remain a true community and avoid the "suburb" label I So it is with great sorrow to learn that the city of Arden Hills is considering allowing the chain of Walgreens to build in our community. Walgreens. WalMart, Sam's Club are known for going into small communities and putting the small business owners out of business: This WILL happen in our community, not just to Arden Plaza Pharmacy but to other small businesses as well. Please read the very informative book about the way Wal,ton Corp has put an end to the American dream of owning a small business! Arden Plaza is considered the "hub" of our comrnunity; it is a place where every business owner knows their customer by name and anticipates their needs. A Walgreens will place us in the category of "just another suburb" with the usual cookie cutter look and feel. Please, I beg you to reconsider the plans for placing a IrJalgreens in our community! If and so many others, moved to Arden Hill,s for the amenities, the small town atmosphere, the small businesses that have long been the back bone of America and Lhe runerican dream. Please do not destroy the many gifts that .!;rden Hills offers by trying to compete with the "big boys" such as Shoreview and Vadnais Heights. Sincerely, Claudia tvlunson 1144 Waldon Place Arden Hills Minnesota 55112 munson@gabriel.stodilia.org 1 James Lehnhoff From: Sent: To: Subject: ceronsky1@comcasLnet Saturday, August 04, 2007 7:59 PM James Lehnhoff feedback about plan for Arden Plaza We are 20 + year residents of Arden Hillsr and are writing to express our strong oppoition to the current development plan for Arden Plaza. It is important that not every shopping area in the Cities contain big stores that lack the person feel and service of the current tenants of Arden Plaza. Please keep the special charm of this city. Than k you, Lyn and Chuck Ceronsky 1 From: Ted Stamos <ststamos@mac.com> Subject: Wallgreen's Date: August 4,200712:13:55 AM CDT To: "sjharpstead@comcast.net david.grant.@cLarden-hills.mn.us holdenbj24@aol.com franh116@aol.com davemcclung@comcast.net james.lehnoff@cLarden-hills.mn.us" <sjharpstead@comcast.net david.grant.@ci.arden-hills.mn.us holdenbj24@aol.com franh116@aol.com davemcclung@comcast.net james.lehnoff@cLarden-hills.mn.us> First, We want to express appreciation to everyone in our local city government for the hard work you do, and for the first rate way Arden Hills is governed. As a residents of Arden Hills for some 33 years, we have experienced consistently excellent, competent and thoughtful service from our governing leaders, staff and employees at all levels. We suspect you do not hear this enough, and wanted you to know this. We also think the current body of governing officials raises the bar even above that past record. We are proud of our city and the way it is governed. We have confidence you. That is why we are taking he time to communicate with you because we believe you will listen. We know you will take everything into account before making a final decision. The concern we are raising is over the news we heard about the proposal to place a Wallgreen's Drug store in the Arden Plaza area. We do not support such a plan for our community at that location, and see it as detrimental for a variety of reasons. We already have access to drug stores there and in close surrounding areas. It is not as if we are lacking such services. The traffic and congestion issues there, and in the surrounding area, has already gone beyond what is desirable, and made occasionally even more negative by train traffic tie-ups. A Wallgreen's there can't help but add to the problem. We hope, and know, you will consider all these problems in your deliberations about what is in the best interest of our community. We truly believe that there must be a much more attractive alternative as a solution for that area. A solution that would enhance the ambience we want to preserve, meet a true community need both fiscally and service-wise, and not add to the motorized congestion. We don't believe a Wallgreen's meets these criteria in full. Thank you for your attention regarding these real and deeply felt concerns. We trust that your ultimate decision will indeed be in the best interest of our community. I Please also pass this on to members of the planning Commission inasmuch as we did not have their emails. Sincerely Ted and Sally Stamos 4423 Arden View Court Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112 Mr. and Mrs. Edward A. Olson 1755 Millwood Ave W. Roseville, MN 55113 August 6, 2007 Mr. Stan Harpstead, Mayor Arden City Hall 1245 W. Hwy. 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112 Dear Mayor Harpstead: It was with a great deal of dismay when we heard last week of the plans for a Walgreen's in the area ofthe Arden Plaza Pharmacy. This pharmacy has been a trusted anchor for twenty-nine years for our family. The expansion of the gift shop has brought a beautiful dimension to our regular visits_ The employees have become like family to us. The additional traffic with this plan in the area is also detrimental. We would appreciate your careful and thoughtful consideration in this matter. Sincerely, ~ ~J: ~h.--J Irene L. Olson cc: James Lehnhoff - City Planner David Grant - Council member Brenda Holden - Council member Fran Holmes - Council member Dave McClung - Council member David Sand (Chair) - Planning Commission 6 Augu~t 2007 To: Planning Commission: David Sand (Chair) Clayton Zimmerman (Vice Chair) Clayton Larson Elizabeth Modesette Roberta Thompson Janet Stodola Andy Howela Re: Arden Plaza Walgreens Proposal My wife and I are opposed to the proposal to build a Walgreens store in Arden Plaza on grounds that I) it is not needed and 2) that it would doom the current Arden Pharmacy & Gift Shop. With Cub and Target within walking distance of Arden Plaza, another "box" establishment is not justified nor called for. For as long as I can recall (we've lived in the area for 43 years) the independent pharmacy/gift shops in Arden Plaza have served our needs with excellent, personal service. We would regret losing a community family member. Please reject any proposal to build a Walgreens in Arden Plaza. Page 1 of 1 James Lehnhoff From: Victor Baniak [vbaniak@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, August 06,20072:56 PM To: James Lehnhoff Subject: Proposed Arden Plaza Walgreens City Planner James Lelmhoff, My wife and I are opposed to the proposal to build a Walgreens store in Arden Plaza on grounds that 1) it is not needed and 2) that it would doom the current Arden Pharmacy & Gift shop. With Cub and Target within walking distance of Arden Plaza, another "box" establishment is w! justified nor called for. For as long as I can recall (we've lived in thc area for 43 years) the independent pharmacy/gift shops in Arden Plaza have served our needs with excellcnt, personal service. We would regret losing a community family member. 1.'1ease~i~(;! aI1Y proposal to builda Walgreens in Arden Plaza. Sincerely, Victor and Anne Baniak Be a bctter Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. 8/29/2007 James Lehnhoff From: Sent: To: Subject: Joan Bartell Ubartell@isd.netj Sunday, August 12, 20075:19 PM davemcclung@comcast.net; sjharpstead@comcast.net; James Lehnhoff Proposal To Build Walgreens in Arden Plaza I am sure it is difficult to find the appropriate leassors at some of the Malls cropping up allover the area, but I think that going with an organization which mereely wants to monopolize the drug store traffic in the area, is NOT in the best interests of the people being served by the Arden Plaza. There are plenty of Walgreen's surrounding the Plaza. Just look around. I am sure their offer is grand and tempting, but I wonder at the ethics of putting out of busineess independent stores that have been the back-bone of parts of your community. Not nice, to say the least. Please consider an alternate plan that does not force the current traffic to go elsewhere for their products. j oan g bartell Shoreview resident 1 4-< o ~ <1) bl) oj 0. '" :J C E 2! .c c 0) U ro '0 ~ o .c c .c ~ '" 0) E .~ Q) c W ro " E o " @) OJ C :J o " E 0) > ro U E o " o ro @) CO ~ ~ :r: c ro U:: E o " o ro @) " N :a C ~ ~ <C 0 CO .c ": o ll:: o ..c:: c: ..c:: G> ...J tJ) G> E III .., E ~ r-- (9 o I o U N -> Q) E Ct) ro -g o 0 ~ o -;;: Ol o '" n.. ro:J ::J I.@)g>rs . >- <C ro I 0 ~ 0::: I ~ ~ c ai I ~ ~ c75 ~ I " I, E';; .!. ..Q I ~ ~ ~ ~ u ro 0) w e. ro :r: w ::; OJ :J('. <C", c ."m '" ~ :0.0 <(~ cO ro 0) ~ > o ro ",.c cO) 0) '" ~o .Qlu ro 0) sO; ro.c uS 0) 0) C ::if) I-u 0- z<C OJ '" c 0)'- o~ Ul'l ro <1) N ~ ..c;;ro D-O) c '" 0) c: '0" ~.c <C_ u c ro E c ::; E E o " 0) ro " '" n. ::; c ro S ro E ~ .8 '0 0) E ro '" 0) '" ro ,s '" c: 0) 0) ~ OJ ro s o z u " <f) '" ~ u; '" 1: OJ 'ijj :r: ~ n. o " n. " ,s .8 c 0) W :::; >- u ro ~ ro A " ro E ro .c D- c: " '0 .;c 06 Q) i? ro f- ..Q ::; o C '" " ~o ro E ro .c D- A -" U " > 0; <f) ro '" <f) ,s o z ro OJ c ~ " E <f) :c i5 c: o 0, c: 'x " ...J 06 W u c ::; E ro 2! :r: c 0) '0 4' - o ro -. "-'" rou ,,<( .c~ f-o N ;;:; U) z ~ 2! I c: " '0 .;c OJ" ~ c: " ro -"...J OJu A ~ c: ~ ~=:iill u,,-" .~ c ~ ...JC:~ u<Co) - AU) O~OJ Em(!) <C~~ E o " ...J o <C '" " 'i' ro " ,s - o "" " 0) n. "" ro " c '" ro Q) (9 r-- o o N ~ 0.. C:' 00 Page 1 of2 James Lehnhoff Sent: To: From: LISA NAAKTGEBOREN [lmnaak@msn.com] Monday, August 13, 2007 9:05 PM James Lehnhoff; sjharpstead@comcasLnet; David_Grant; holdenbj24@aol.com; franh116@aol.com; davemcclu ng@comcast.net Subject: Opposition to Walgreens Proposal Dear Mayor Harpstead, Arden Hills City Council Members, and City Staff: We are writing to share our strong opposition to the proposed addition of a Walgreens store at Arden Plaza. We have both been customers of the Arden Plaza stores since moving to the city in 1997, regularly frequenting the tanning salon, Great China, ACE Hardware, and Arden Pharmacy & Gifts. For our family, Arden Pharmacy has become a local favorite not only for their excellent selection of greeting cards and high-quality gifts or the friendly and knowledgeable staff, but most importantly because of the satisfaction that comes with supporting a hometown business instead of a major corporation that has no connection to the cities in which they build stores. Our personal feelings aside, there are several other things that must be considered before approving the addition of a Walgreens at Arden Plaza, which is impractical and unfeasible at the suggested location. 1. Road design and traffic patterns at the intersection of Lexington Avenue and County Road E, as well as Plaza entrance and exit routes, have not been built to support the increased traffic that a Walgreens would likely bring. 2. There are already problems with backed-up traffic and general traffic flow at the Lexington/County Road E intersection numerous times during the day due to nearby proximity of the railroad track. 3. Cub Foods and Target, both located within a half mile radius of Arden Plaza, already offer large-scale, big-name, discount pharmacies that likely compete with Arden Pharmacy. The Lexington Avenue shopping area of Arden Hills is not large enough to support a fourth store of the same type. However, the area does lack diversity for consumers and the city would be wise to pursue other retailers who would enhance this. A more strategic approach would be to solicit retailers that would complement the existing Plaza stores, such as Aldi Food Market, a bookstore, family restaurant, or another daycare to support the working parents at Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Land 0' Lakes, Deluxe, Bethel, and Northwestern. 4. Walgreens stores already exist at Snelling Avenue and County Road C (approximately three miles south of Arden Hills) and at County Road 10 and Long Lake Road (approximately three miles north of Arden Hills). Residents who are compelled to shop at a Walgreens store can easily go to one of these locations. 5. Reports about anticipated development of the TCAAP acreage on the Highway 96 side of Arden Hills promise that zoning regulations will ensure a residential and commercial blend. If we must entertain a proposal from Walgreens, it would make more sense to invite them to build a store in lhat area, where there will be new residential growth, rather than to watch them force Arden Pharmacy out of business. We hope that you will consider the personal and economic impact of potentially losing our own "mom-and-pop" pharmacy and gift store. It is not "progress," nor is it "growth," to add one retailer at the likely eXPense of another. Please vote against the Walgreens/Arden Plaza proposal. Sincerely, Lisa Naaktgeboren 1416 Arden View Dr Arden Hills Imnaak@msn_com Geza Batiz 3715 New Brighton Rd Arden Hills g~~a_,_b9JI?-@gmajl_(;or:n 8/29/2007 James Lehnhoff From: Sent: To: Subject: Kathleen Conard [kconard@ties2.net] Monday, August 13, 2007 10:09 AM James Lehnhoff Walgreen's @ Arden Plaza City Planner- Please do not allow a Walgreen1s to build in Arden Plaza. My opposition is based on the fact that we have a unique non-chain drugstore with Arden Pharmacy that serves its customers with sound support for getting the best medicines and is comparable with price. My second reason for the opposing the proposal is that area is already congested with traffic,. The third reason is there are now three pharmacies along Lexington from Arden Pharmacy @ County Road E, Cub pharmacy north of there and Target Pharmacy near 694. Kathleen Conard 1474 Arden View Drive Arden Hills, MN 55112 1 Aug,14.2007 9:49AM MIDWEST CENTER 763 494 7706 No,4913 p. 1/1 To Whom It May Concern: I was made aware that you are considering building a Walgreens in Arden Plaza First and foremost this would certainly make Adren Pharmacy move. They are a "small town" type pharmacy who knows everyone of their customers and treats them like a neighbor or friend_ You can't find that in a big box pharmacy. If! chose to do that I would go to Target or Cub. Second there is absolutely no way that the parking area or road system could support a Walgreens. Have you ever tried to get out of that parking lot from 4PM-6PM? It is nearly impossible without risking life and limb. I am asking you to reconsider this absurd proposal. Sincerely, Greg and Tami Klint 5662 Heather Ridge Dr Shoreview, MN 55126 651-483-9035 ..,..}/ ':'. ....... Page I of I James Lehnhoff From: Skiddy [feile52@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 15,20079:14 PM To; sjharpstead@comcast.net; James Lehnhoff; david.grant@ci.aren-hills.mn_us; holdenbj24@aol.com; fran116@aol.com; davemcclung@comcast.net Subject: walgreens hello As a citizen of this community, I wonder what your motivations are for considering the building ofa Walgreens pharmacy. There are already 2 chain pharmacies (Cub and Target) and a private one (Arden Pharmacy) within a I mile radius. The community does not need another chain phannacy and obviously will not support 4. The loser would obviously be the independent store without the deep financial pockets of the chains. I'm saddened to see that the city of Arden Hills is willing to sacrifice a long standing business in the area that is used by customers from Shoreview, Vadnais Heights, North Oaks, New Brighton, Roseville and other surrounding communities. The small local pharmacy provides personal service and individual attention for our aging neighbors that cannot be matched by the chains as well as a post office and alternative gifts that the chains do not carry. The traffic increase at an already busy intersection and often times difficult to enter and exit from County road E would be a mistake. I strongly hope you choose not to approve this unnecessary addition to our community. Linda Larson Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect. Join Vahool's user panel and lay it on us. 8/29/2007 Page 1 of! James Lehnhoff . ^""-^""N"'_~-C"~__"~,c_'''r''~~~=.."_....,,",,__....,..,.....~...,,..,.,,,,,,,,""~y~,~.",._~_ ",,,,~,,,~~-,",,c_,_,,.,,,~","____,__----,_-,=,,~_~,,__",_"~,,_ From: Robin Bertuleit [Robin_Bertuleit@onvoy.com] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 20079:21 AM To: James Lehnhoff; sjharpstead@comcast.net;David_Grant; holdenbj24@aol.com;franh116@aol.com; Davemcclung@comcast.net Subject: Opposition to Walgreens at Lexington Ave & County Rd E Importance: High 1 am writing to voice my opposition to a Walgreen's being built in the Arden Plaza shopping center at Lexington Ave. & County Road E in Arden Hills. This intersection is already SO busy. Lexington Ave (Southbound) goes from two lanes down to one lane right at the East entrance to the plaza. The increase in traffic coming into the parking lot going to the proposed Walgreen's site would create even more congestion at the stop light than that intersection could safely handle. Respectfully, Robin Bertuleit 8/29/2007 Page 1 of 1 James Lehnhoff From: Sandy Loscheider [sandyloscheider@yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, August 17, 20079:21 PM To: James Lehnhoff Subject: Arden Pharmacy August 17, 2007 Dear City Planner, I am Sandy Loscheider from Shoreview_ I wish to VOlce my concern over your proposed project which would cause my Pharmacy, Arden Pharmacy, to close. My husband and I have used this pharmacy for the past 30 years. We live just barely a mile away from Arden Pharmacy. We know the people who work there and they know us by name. We can always trust them to watch out for us. They make sure that a new prescription will not interfere with other prescriptions that we may have. There is already a Walgreens on Rice and Co. Rd_ C and one on Snelling and Co. Rd. C. I have never shopped at any of them. I went into a Walgreens only twice in the past 30 years. Both times I found that their sale prices were higher than at Target or WalMart's regular price. Both times, I left without purchasing anything. If you close Arden Pharmacy, you can be assured we will not shop at Walgreens. I am glad to hear that Ace Hardware would still be there. However, most of our dollars spent at Arden Plaza is at the Pharmacy. Please reconsider the proposal. Keep Arden Pharmacy. Sincerely, Sandy Loscheider 899 Edgewater Ave. Shoreview, MN 55126 Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out. Shape Yahoo! in your own image. Join our Network Research Panel today! Shape Yahoo I in your own image. Join OUf Network Research Panel today! 8/29/2007 Page 1 of 1 James Lehnhoff From: Larry McGough [LMcGough@mcgough,com] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2007 8:34 AM To: James Lehnhoff; sjharpstead@comcasLnet; David_Grant; holdenbj24@aol.com; franh116@aol.com; davemcclung@comcast.net Subject: Opposition to new Walgreens in Arden Plaza Ladies and Gentleman, I am opposed to the submitted proposal to build a new Walgreens in Arden Plaza. Traffic is already a major problem and will continue to get worse, Getting out of the Center at rush hour is close to impossible now and turning left from the center onto County Road "E" is impossible, If traffic is backed up on Lexington because of a train, which often occurs during rush hour, one needs to go South on Lexington around lake Josephine in order to go West from the Center- It is in the best interests of Arden Hills and nearby residents to tum the proposal down. Thank you, Lawrence J, McGough 1666 Lake Johanna Blvd Arden Hills, MN 8/29/2007 Page 1 of 1 James Lehnhoff . '""'-_"~_'_^_'___^~'~'_'c--"'''_~''''"__'m~___'''-,,-_''''_.,.".,,,,_~~._~ .. __"_,.~,..",__--,,,~,,,,,~~.__ From: Sent: To: Marilyn Rogers [marilynrog@comcastnetj Saturday, August 18, 2007 9:31 PM James Lehnhoff Cc: sjharpstead@comcast.nel; David_Grant; holdenbj@aol.com;franh116@aol.com; davemcclung@comcast.net Subject: Walgreens Dear Mayor and Councilmembers, I was devastated to hear the plans to change Arden Plaza. When I told my play-going partner, she said I spoiled the whole night. Hardly a day goes by that I don't stop in at the Plaza. I don't know what I'd do without the drug store for prescriptions, gIftS, health and personal needs and greeting cards. A do-it-yourself or garden project invariably brings two or three trips to the hardware. I've gotten my hair cut there for ten or so years. The restaurant sees us enjoying Chinese food every so often. It's the only laundry/cleaners we've ever used. I do this in spite of the terrible traffic on Cty. Rd E. I hate to think of adding more cars to the area. So you can see the stores at Arden Plaza are one of the blessings of living in Arden Hills. We also save on gasoline and spare the environment If you OK the proposed "development", I will have to drive up and down HWY 96 to find comparable shopping. One thing is sure, I will NOT shop at Walgreens. Even when I am at Byerly's I skip the Walgreens and travel to Arden Plaza for drugs and sundries. Marilyn Rogers 1574 Oak Avenue 8/29/2007 a!Jf1d OlD, :;;.007 ArzoerJ j{:J\<. f:>/<<n,.,;"y CD//?;r1,S5'O~eTS' b ", ,,~cl C;; A> n , i Va cJ Ivrl z,: '" rn er In c<"v C-/c , +orJ La/"~"cJ ~ Ie 7<0. b2 /-h (>>oJe So-' 1/<..- /<0 be. ~t..<..- ~().J'}1.pfOnJ 04. n f-- S f-- 0 c(o / cc. {+nJ'1 fJuwejcc. j, C<.rY' 1o.v.4-t ~J -JG '-}0<0 ;" JU.UocJ, Mv ICe MVJ; C/t / ,4!<2.w Bu.c'l d cvf /l ""Wi jJ k z,. <L +0 J <0U S{voncyl, 7-r! ~ AOO~ 01 1-l~ c~dofrr"J - 1- -R~ l-V'J-J d-hh ~ - euv1i.:o 6 oJ 30 -t- ')eacr -' Q"C, (QrTY\~r I/}OI' ~f:b 2;./2 (,): II e 1~J.ud < t- tiJa:r. '" ISo -r~ lYlOJo( 1hof,Cc problem. ~" {hJ plc,zC( ("lrri'SC; ,'on ~, t.'> .JJv; ~ tJQf u' Jd !-iv. &n~ tv1^- Ji JR OJ RYhploja- 0--5 A( "-,,z.. '-flv PeW"""'1 lJ. ~ s W~H! ()!\.7 12- 6 Lu) ,3u..n' "I u... J"t- f)U'1 fw !:a.v> ,0 ~tLl QUQ..v(t~'I- flCl.z- '" ,;.- "-'c~lj '" "p6.i-~"- It' +Iv iJa '7 pes' i 'Ue oO-n~ WAM.~ 1vv-,r.y,,6 - \6 ( C( ,u.c"'1 <' ny tf", P^Opo'''' ( .'" ' ~CY pCGr. LOOU.,J,lk C<.- No\ u-,y\)SC 0: II p a.-v,& Ill.wl ~'-zJ,~l-,,-J - T J;horpu/(J!.U I Ate)."", IJL.Qj,.. / &-U-. ;:Jh,d 4ft<<5 !! ~ F/fJ wo~ ~ (001'0(\/7 )~~1ffi1 17 ~U~,I1 If 3 Z 3 I-OnJO/b Q)(.U t rV l. t2.-Q~ ~Cc 5wl/9 76:s- 70-0)- b r.; Page 1 of 1 James Lehnhoff From: Walter Bieger Iwbieger8@comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2007 5:39 PM To: undisclosed-recipients Subject: Walgreens In Arden Plaza re: Walgreens in Arden Plaza Our names are Walter & Marilyn BiegeL We live at 1689 Lake Valentine Rd. Arden Hills, MN 55112. Phone: 651- 636 - 8500 We would like to express our opinions on the above matter: 1. Neither of us feel that a Walgreens in Arden Plaza is appropriate. We do most of our business with the Walgreens on Old Hwy. 10, in Mounds View, and this works fine. 2. A Walgreens in Arden Plaza is not necessary_ It would make parking more difficult and it would make ingress and egress more difficult. Access, in and out of that lot is already hard enough! 3. We would not want to lose the Arden Pharmacy store. It has many other items that we enjoy. 4. We are opposed to this plan. Thank you, Walter & Marilyn Bieger 8/29/2007 ~~p",,~~~ ~ v..d~j," ~ ~ 717~~~~~ ~~~ ~ . ~ ~ y ::r eJ--lJ/ fl?-~~~~~ (3~ ~~~~, _ / o-.b~~ <~ o--!------z;G d077~ f r~ ~6~ ~ - ~J~d:, ~ 0L ~ 70YV ~J-&eJ--1~, /,AJ /10, ~~ ~L~~ ~ ~~ / ) ~?-~~I 7 ~~~~'56U~~ ~~--0~~ ~~ ~~~~~~~ 0, ' '7 ,;:7 ~ ~~ ~" a/~ ~00~ - ~ v<-/ ~fr~~.' r? Reco;ved AUG 22 Z007 ~~ ~~ CityofArd9nKiHs ~VIJ~<D ~ c)o-/:-~c9-~ ~~ - :z:;- ~ -/~ ~~ /LJ .' ~-~~ . ~~'L'~~ & -~~-dy.~ ~~ ~ ..L7 // J/)h- /P~ %~ g-;J;J.-C/ ' / J),/Y>'V ~ &'-n ~a'f/ '7 /N a,~ /~~ _ ~ ~.</J"~ ~~J/ ~ 1/'-=;7 ~ C~~ fi7' ~~,...- ~.c-? ~ ~~ ~~ 7' ff7~.L.vVV ~~t ;if/d4'~ ~/c~~ ~ 4'P ~- /C 7~d---~ CAb f'~ ,:df'~.~/ ~=-- ~'/~/ C' ~ pd& ?///..,f ~;r#~ /.g.~. P;r .IN ~J j AX' M/t'~ ~ /'k ~~ tIl;ifU-c. _ ~~ ,nc c2/>~ AJ~ ~ N~ Jc, ~~- /J ~ . {/V4a.. G~ cuJ I-tWI/ '7/ g;}Y ?if.???;i~ av, <<,;'O?v-J:.ec, ~,4<.. Oe.11\..L'C c~\l?GJj 1600 o_oJ\ a~ bS( - 63-.>-lbQ-f (oole"'\-" f ~ J'-<..Qj\'-f <A\~('L0.\ Page 1 ofl James Lehnhoff From: Sent: To: Lynn _ C _ Y oung@bluecrossmn.com Thursday, August 23, 2007 12:50 PM James Lehnhoff Subject: ARDEN PLAZA Sir - 1 have lived in Arden Hills for over 19 years. 1 love Arden Hills and want only the best for our city!! I! I can't believe that you are even THINKING of putting a Walgreens in Arden Plaza - why would you want to do that???? If you are trying to make it difficult to drive in the area due to too much traffic - you're on the right track. If you are trying to make it hard to park in the lot to go to any of the merchants, that's a stupid thing to do. Have you been to Arden Plaza recently? In the last 5 years? We ALREADY have a fantastic phannacy in Arden Plaza - it also has one ofthe few gift shops in our area that carries unique, well-priced, darling items. Are you trying to put that one out of business? I hope not!!!! I rarely go to Walgreens - I can't ever find what I'm looking for in that store. But if! do want to go there, I know there is one very close in Roseville. I don't need a second one in my back yard. PLEASE DON'T PUT A WALGREENS IN ARDEN PLAZA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!'!!'!!!!!!!!! Lynn Young 4387 Arden View Ct Arden Hills, MN 55112 Important news aboul email communications: If our business rules identify sensitive infonnation, you will receive a ZixMail Secure Message With a link 10 view yow- message. First-time recipients \\"ill be asked to create <l password before they are granted access. To learn more about ZixMail, ZixCorp Secure Email Message Center, and Olher ZixCorp offerings, please go to http://userawarencss_zixcmp.com/secure4/index . php The information contained in this communication may be confidential, and is intended only fOrlbe llse of the recipient{s} named Jbnn~_ If the reader orthis message is not the intended recipient, you arc hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying oflhis communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in elTor, please return it to the sender immediately aod delete the- original message and any copy of it from your compuler system. If you !Jau;: an) questions concerniog this message, please contact the sender Unenctyptcd, unauthenticated Intemel e-mail is inherently insecure. Internet messages may be cOlTUpted or incomplete, or lOa)' incorrectly identit"): the sender. 8/2912007 ~ August 23, 2007 Great China 3547 N. Lexington Ave. Arden Hills, MN 55126 (651) 481-8100 ,~~-" ~,.? "'? <"1 }~ c: U .l~ City of Arden Hills PlalUling Commission Chairman David Sand, Vice Chair Clayton Zimmerman, Commissioner Clayton Larson, Commissioner Elizabeth Modesette, Commissioner Roberta Thompson, Commissioner Janet Stodola, Commissioner Andy Holewa City of Arden Hills 1245 West Highway 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112 Dear Chairman Sand, I am the owner of Great China Restaurant. We have been a tenant at Arden Plaza for the past 8 years. We are proud to be a successful small business in the City of Arden Hills. We recently extended our lease for an additional five years and expect to continue to provide high quality Asian cuisine for many years to come. We are aware that our landlord, Wellington Management, Inc., has proposed a new Walgreens be constructed on the comer of County Road E and Lexington. They are also hoping to add additional retail stores south of the proposed Walgreens as part of their effort to upgrade the existing retail center. These new retailers would certainly help our business continue to grow and expand. Replacing the existing office building with a Walgreens and other smaller retailers would increase customer traffic, improve the visibility of the retail center and help other small businesses in this retail center. While we appreciate and value our good friends at Arden Pharmacy, we feel that Walgreens would bring more customers and help us all to maintain and grow our businesses. By opening up the existing retail center so that people driving by on Lexington and County Road E can see the center would really help make this center much more visible and accessible. Please support the Wellington Management, Inc. redevelopment plans for Arden Plaza. We need your help. Thanks you for your consideration. Sincerely, ~dA( Linn Marohl, Owner Great China Restaurant cc: Mayor Stan Harpstead, James Lehnhoff, Karen Barton Page I of 1 James Lehnhoff From: Bill Walsh [cecnbill@visi.comj Sent: Saturday, August 25, 20078:18 AM To: James Lehnhoff; sjharpstead@comcast.net;David_Grant; holdenbj24@aol.com;franh116@aol.com; davemcclung@comcast.net To whom this may concern: We are concerned about the proposed Walgreens Drug Store being built in the Arden Plaza Shopping Center. We do not need another drug store in the center and surely not another Walgreens as there is one south on Lexington and east and west on County Rd C. We do not believe that Walgreens wants to build there as they have the neighborhood saturated. This extra drug store may cause the Arden Pharmacy to close and it has been our pharmacy, post office and gift shop. The traffic is very heavy in that area and the pollution from the extra cars could be significant as it is on Snelling and University. It is difficult to travel in the Lexington and County Rd E area now. A Walgreens will cause more congestion. Mary Cecilia Walsh William E. Walsh 8/29/2007 3557 N. Lexington Avenue I Arden Hills, Minnesota 55126 (651) 490-3348 [ ardenhillsmn@anytimefitness.com www.anytimefitness.com ~~rt.YT.h-~5 ~ " r-I Inn::::::.:::.@ City of Arden Hills Planning Commission 1245 W Hwy 96 Arden Hills, MN. 55112 RE; Arden Plaza I am the owner of the ANYTIME FITNESS located on the north end of the Arden Plaza. We opened in February 2007. ANYTIME FITNESS is a National Franchise of small 24 hour fitness clubs that are mostly located in convenient locations that are easy for the local community to access. I have been working in the Arden Hills area since 1994 and have owned several businesses located in Arden Hills. Since then I have seen every area updated except the Arden Plaza. The City has let the local developers bring in large chains, franchises and anchor stores to all areas. Now it is time to update Arden Plaza The plaza is in a great location and has some very solid businesses. We also have a lack of customer traffic to our businesses due to the fact that consumers in cars cannot see us with the office park on the comer. This is ma..king a major impact on our business since most people in the area simply do not drive into the plaza to see what businesses are there. The areas age and demographics continue to change and the businesses need anchor stores to sustain our livelihoods. Until the plaza is redeveloped, we will continue to rotate businesses in and out of the plaza thus adding expense and hardship to the owners that are trying to do a good thing for the Arden Hills Community. The businesses in the plaza deserve the same redevelopment as those near the Our business has been forced to spend huge dollars on advertising and use portable signs and banners to attempt to attract attention to our club. The city has very strict regulations against these signs, leaving us in a no win position. The bottom line is that the Arden Plaza businesses need this redevelopment and updating in order to continue to stay in business. Thank you Sincerely ~. ANYTIME FITNESS ~~r!.YTjr!}!; - (.r-I I nn::::=:a=:a, ~ To whom this may concern: We are concerned about the proposed Walgreens Drng Store being built in the Arden Plaza Shopping Center. We do not need another drug store in the center and surely not another Walgreens as there is one south on Lexington and east and west on County Rd C. We do not believe that Walgreens wants to build there as they have the neighborhood saturated. This extra drug store may cause the Arden Pharmacy to close and it has been our pharmacy, post office and gift shop. The traffic is very heavy in that area and the pollution from the extra cars couId be significant as it is on Snelling and University. It is difficult to travel in the Lexington and County Rd E area now_ A Walgreens will cause more congestion. /J[;C1ak/4 W~~ 2u/~ ~'d 866L-~8t-~99 YSIBM 1I!8 Bv~:80 LO gz: Bnlt ~ ~HILLS MEMORANDUM DATE: September 5, 2007 PC Agenda Item 4.A TO: Planning Commission FROM: James Lehnhoff, CitYPlanne#- SUBJECT: Miniature Horse: Domestic Animal or Farm Animal? ATTACHMENT: Correspondence from Ms. Linders and miniature horse information ReQuested Action Staff is requesting an interpretation of the Zoning Code on whether miniature horses should be classified as "domestic animals" or "farm animals." Backe:round In August 2007, Staff received a request to allow a miniature horse on a residential property. Upon review ofthe City's Zoning Code, Staffs initial opinion was that miniature horses should be classified as "farm animals" since horses are usually associated with farms instead of residential areas. Farm animals are subject to certain setback regulations that greatly restrict the ability of most properties to host farm animals. If miniature horses are classified as farm animals, Ms. Linders would probably not be able to host a miniature horse on her property. However, the Zoning Code's defmitions for domestic, farm, and wild animals do not directly address miniature horses, and there is room for interpretation on the definitions for animals. Ms. Linders is requesting the Planning Commission to review the definitions in the Zoning Code to determine if miniature horses should be classified as domestic animals or farm animals. Ms. Linders has provided a letter in support of her request and pictures of miniature horses. Staffhas included additional information miniature horse from the American Miniature Horse Association. \\Metro-inet.uslardenhillslPlanninglPlanning CommissionWew-Old Business\2007\082707 - Minature Horses - domestic animals.doc Page 1 00 City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor September 5, 2007 Zonin!! Code The definitions in Section 1305.04 of the Zoning Code for domestic, farm, and wild animal are as follows: Section 1305.04 Subd. 8 Animals, domestic. Common household pets, such as dogs and cats, other animals kept for amusement, companionship, decoration, or interest. Subd. 9 Animals, farm. Animals traditionally kept or raised on a farm for the purpose of providing food or products for sale or use, such as cattle, horses, goats, sheep, swine, fowl, bees, and animals raised for fur. Subd.10 Animals, wild. Animals such as wolves, tigers and poisonous snakes that are not normally a domestic animal Section 1325.07 Subd 7 regulates the number and type of animals that are permitted on a property: Section 1325.07 Subd 7 A. Location for Buildings Housing Farm Animals. Any building in which farm animals are kept shall be located a distance of two hundred (200) feet or more from any lot line. Any open structure in which farm animals are kept shall be a distance of four hundred (400) feet or more from any lot line. B. Number of Animals Allowed. Up to four (4) domestic animals, excluding birds and fish, are permitted in any dwelling unit, but without a residential dog kennel license not more than two (2) may be dogs. Up to three (3) dogs are allowed with a residential dog kennel license. Dog enclosures may be located only in a rear yard in all zoning districts. C. Animals for Research. Animals for research may be kept in appropriate places by conditional use permit. D. Wild Animals. Wild animals are not permitted in any district. Based on the setback requirements for farm animals in the above Part A, most residential properties are simply not large enough to host farm animals and still meet the required setbacks. Domestic animals do not have any additional setback requirements. While a regular horse would be classified as a farm animal, there is room for interpretation on whether a miniature horse qualifies as a farm animal or a domestic animal. The definition for domestic animal includes".. . animals kept for amusement, companionship, decoration, or interest," which could conceivably include miniature horses. However, while a miniature horse may not be a typical farm animal based on the above definition, a miniature horse is probably also not considered a "common household pet." The wild animal definition does not appear to apply to this situation. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor September 5,2007 \\Metro-inet.uslardenhillsIPlanninglPlanning CommissionWew-Old Business\2007\082707 - Minature Horses - domestic animals.doc Page 2 of3 Although Ms. Linders is requesting this Zoning Code interpretation for her specific property, this interpretation would apply to all properties and it does set a precedent. If miniature horses are classified as domestic animals, they would be permitted on most properties subject to the regulations in Section 1325.07 Subd 7.A-D. Ifminiature horses are classified as farm animals, the applicant could request a variance to reduce the required setbacks in Section 1325.07 Subd 7.A; however, it is difficult to foresee what the hardship for such a request would be. Options and Proposed Motion Lanl!ual!e 1. Motion to recommend classifying "miniature horses" as domestic animals. 2. Motion to recommend classifying "miniature horses" as farm animals. 3. Motion to table the request (a motion to table this request should include direction on what additional information is needed to make a final determination). If a recommendation is made, it will be forwarded to the September 24, 2007, City Council meeting for a final determination. Attachment Correspondence from Ms. Linders and miniature horse information City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor September 5, 2007 IlMetro-inet.uslardenhills\PlanninglPlanning CommissionWew-Old Business\2007\082707 - Minature Horses - domestic animals.doc Page 3 of3 - 4-< o - <l) ~ A< lI: o .c:: c:: .c:: GI ...J 11l GI E III .., E o :2 " C- 'co OJ E lO o ~ .c: I"- ~ ~ ~ Q) 0 "C ~ .c: ~ ~ ~ e ~ ~ l1g'l!::'c ~ <( ~ 'E OJ ~ C '- "'C ro J:: .E .~ ~ ~ OJ" ...J Q) lJl _ C Q) C e "'C E CO 8 ~ ~ .~ 0.: u Eo.:'" o c ~ Ii: ~ ~ ~ 4-< o '" 'g P, "Cl ;g .- '" ~ o ~ '" gp ~ 0) :::E ~ 0;5 .~ " ] o p, '" 0) ~ ...... "Cl @ '" 0) "Cl o " p .- o il OIl .S i - '" " 0) 0) ..0 0) ~ ..<:: ...... ..0 - o '" ~ 0) ;>, <::> - ~ g l--(".;j '" ]~ ~ ~ o ~ ....:i ...; :::E ~ 0) o '" .... ~ .S 0) ....:i ~ .~ ...r:l Cd~ to 0) Z Ei '" 0 .- - 0) '" ~~ " 8 ~il o t;:: 'u 0) p, '" 0) 11 Ei - g '" jg p 'u 0) 0;5 0) ..0 S Ei o '" - <il - - 0) <E 0) 0) ..s "i'i o ~ ;>, 'i3 o '" .- 0) '" .... ..8 0) ~ ';:: 's < c-. <il .5 @ ] '" "Cl 0) .g .<;; " o o ;>, ']1 .- " t;:: 0) "Cl 0) <Ii '" 0) .... '" o .... ..<::..8 0) 0) ~B ';:: '" .- ';:: Ei's '" .... .~ c.S -" '" '" 0) ....- ~ e - '" ;:l Ei .... 0) - ] '" il ~ ~ ..8 .... <S '" i:i 8 ~ .~ ~ 0) 0;5 " o 0) . o Ei @ 0) .- 0;5 ~ 0) ;>- '" gJ ~..9 "Cl_ .- 0 19 " 8:9 ...."Cl 0)- ;> ;:l 0)..0 p~ ..-t..... o '" il1 ::9 0) ;:l"<:: 0- ~ " " 0 Cd 8 .5 @ @'g a ~ ~ .... ",<S "Cl '" ~ S "Cl<S "00 tU "..<:: 0_ 0"Cl m" ......t;:: 0) 0 ~- ..8] CI.) ",E ~~ .- <l) .S .S Ei::: '" 0 ~~ ;;;0;5 ::a Ei " 0 8<l:: <l) <l) m..o ..0 ~ ;>, ,.,. o '" ..0 s- " .- <l) '" .... o ..<:: <l) ~ ';:: 's '" g- <l) ,.,. o - ~ '" "8 t;:: @ o ...... .... <l) 0;5 <l) ~ "i'i o ~ '" '" <l) "Cl .- !3 o ;>, ~ ,.;g o - "Cl <l) - '" ~ <l) .5 <l) ..0 "Cl 'i3 ~ ...... d o ;>, 1 ~ ;;; Q) .... <l) g .- m '" .... <l) "8 ;::l <l) .- <il to Z .....: <l) ~ ~ ~ :::E " o '" " o .- '0 .- "Cl <l) .... <l) ~ . !:I '" 0;5 .~ ;:l ..0 o - " ~ ~ o ~ c-. 1: " :.:;;l o o i!l ..... <::> <::> !:::! ..... !:::! 00 Aug. 16, 2007 Mr. James Lehnhoff City of Arden Hills 1245 West Highway 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112-5734 Dear Mr. Lehnhoff, My name is Natalie Linders, I am 10 year old, and I am writing to ask the city to review the definition of fann animals and domestic animals. I would like to suggest that miniature horses should be considered domestic animals. You're probably thinking that miniature horses, since they're horses, should be considered farm animals. Here are four reasons why I think they are domestic animals: . They can visit hospitals, while most fann animals cannot do that. · Minis are nicknamed "the ambassadors of goodwill" and interact with humans like puppy dogs. . They are sometimes used as guide animals. . They can and do ride in cars with people. To see pictures of these, go to www.tbart.comandclickonFunPhotos. Here is some information on minis as well. Six minis can live in one acre and not be cramped, or three in a half acre and so on. They're about the size of a chocolate Labrador. They need 10 feet by 10 feet of shelter, or the equivalent of this size (about 100 square feet). The impact on the property would most likely be minimal. (No pun intended.) Their manure breaks down, unlike dog poop, but of course I'd pick up all of the droppings. Miniature horses are very quiet, calm animals and would not disturb the neighbors. They are also very gentle, so they would not be dangerous toward the neighbors. Please forward my request to define miniature horses as domestic animals to the Planning Commission and the City Council for review. I would be happy to answer any more questions you might have about miniature horses. Sincerely, 1\~~~J5JJ~ Natalie Linders 651-633-5553 ~"horse sales, breeding at T BAR T ranch in Texas Click on any picture to enlarge. Play The Guitar- Muffin owned by Donna Evans, Photo by Nancy Stephens Take a Nap - Photo courtesy Guide Hor.ses Pull a Chuck Wagon VIsit the hospital Page 4 of6 Hold them in your hands! Cover of Have a Mini Laugh! Photo Sherry Horse of the Future, Jill Swedlow Tavel Go for a car ride -<Bonnie Flynn & Vmnie - Associated Press Guide Horses - Photo Courtesy Guide Horses Play House WIth Hope Ride and Jump! .,~r'~'; .' .". , * ~ _;'~l.', "~,_ ~'I"l &are the Dog! Big and little - photo courtesy of Bended Knee Miniature Horse Farm WHAT CAN YOU DO WITH AMINI? II UPDATED: MAy 16, 2004 Thanks to MaIy Crane, W W Miniatnre Horse Farm, NW Painted Ponies, Wimmer Minis, Joan Vandenise, Donna Neargardner, and Katy Morland for the fun mini photos. Click on any photo to make it larger. http://www.tbart.netlevents.cfin 8/17/2007 AMERICAN MINIATURE HORSE ASSOCIA nON lof2 http;//www.amha.orglindex.asp?KeyName=122 IIIASSOCIATION INFORMATION - BREED INFORMATION - FINANCE - GENETICS BREED INFORMATION About The Breed I Standards I Sic vs Small I Newcomer Facts I F. A. Q. Standard of Perfection General Impression: A small, sound, well-balanced horse, possessing the correct conformation characteristics required of most breeds, Refinement and femininity in the mare. Boldness and masculinity in the stallion - the general impression should be one of symmetry, strength, agility and alertness. Since the breed objective is the smallest possible perfect horse, preference in judging shall be given the smaller horse, other characteristics being approximately equal. Size: Must measure not more than 34 inches at the withers, at the last hairs of the mane. Head: In proportion to length of neck and body. Broad forehead with large prominent eyes set wide apart. Comparatively short distance between eyes and muzzle. Profile straight or slightly concave below the eyes. Large nostrils. Clean, refined. Even bite. Ears: Medium in size. Pointed. Carried alertly with tips curving slightly inward. Throat-Latch: Clean and well defined allowing ample flexion at the poll. Neck: Flexible, lengthy, in proportion to body and type and blending smoothly into the withers. Shoulder: Long, sloping and well angulated, allowing a free-swinging stride and alert head/neck carriage. Well-muscled forearm. Body: Well muscled with ample bone and substance. Balanced and well proportioned. Short back and loins in relation to length of underline. Smooth and generally level top-line. Deep girth and flank. Trim barrel. Hindquarters: Long, well-muscled hip, thigh and gaskin. Highest point of croup to be same height as withers, Tail set neither excessively high or low, but smoothly rounding off rump. Legs: Set straight and parallel when viewed from front or back. Straight, true and squarely set, when viewed from the side with hooves pointing directly ahead. Pasterns sloping about 45 degrees and blending smoothly, with no change of angle from the hooves to the ground. Hooves to be round and compact. Trimmed as short as practicable for an unshod horse. Smooth, fluid gait in motion. Color: Any color or marking pattern, and any eye color, is equally acceptable. The hair should be lustrous and silky. CONTACT AMHA I AMHA MERCHANDISE I WEB SITE SPONSORS I REGIONAL MAP ~I !m~Qq1ll!l~~r$mlj i!!'D WWW @ www.amha.org CORPORATE SPONSORS: g~~'P'rp" Estate Horse Supply ~~~ Metro Golf Cars Gencoro Ins Group Estate Horse Suoplv 8/27/2007 6;33 PM AMERICAN MINIATURE HORSE ASSOCIA nON , ?~~i.iFbf;i~,:~ /iJj~~ . {fL-, ...~.7.., 'I:'->: '::'.1 \.~: .~". j ~~;','----,*Y- ""~...--._----_::..;."" ,.'.-"..~.~~.~ Platform Feedina System Double K Industries NEWI I r~ DOUBLE DIAMOND {~j' lACK &: IQLJl'Ml\il Double Diamond Tack http://www.amha.orglindex.asp?KeyName~ 122 Tioaa Territorv Kee-Port, Inc,JtA EquiPage EqulFone -~_. ~.. Eaui~Page/Eaui-Fone Browse Archives at ro'OUPs.google.com AMHA - 5601 South Interstate 35 W - Alvarado, Texas, 76009 Phone (817)783-5600 - Fax (817)783-6403 - Information(1i}amha.oro Copyright@1996-2007 American MIniature Horse Association, Inc. All rights reselVed. 20f2 8/27/2007 6:33 PM AMERICAN MINIATURE HORSE ASSOCIA nON http://www.amha.orglindex.asp?KeyName= 123 IllASSOCIATION INFORMATION - BREED INFORMATION - FINANCE - GENETICS Big Versus Small BREED INFORMATION About The Breed I Standards I Big vs Small! Newcomer Facts I F. A. a. The information on this chart, "Comparison: American Miniature Horse to an Average Full Sized Horse", is gathered from a variety of sources and is not intended to represent specific or actual costs. Prior to the start up of any horse operation, material and financial profitability should be examined in detail. 100 Factors Considered Purchase Price Feed Costs Professional Stable Cost Trainer Costs (Halter In Hand) Pasture Size Tack~Halters Work Show Harness Work Pleasure Driving Blankets Sheets Saddles Carts American Miniature Horse $1,000 to $200,000. Depending on gender, size, conformation, blood-line, show record. The smaller & more correctly conformed, the greater the value. Approximately $25 per month/horse. Indudes hay and grain. $50 to $150 per monthlhorse Miniatures can be kept in backyards with a Mini barn or shelter depending upon local zoning laws. $300 & Up per monthlhorse. Family involvement encouraged. Even children can help train a Miniature Horse. 3 Miniature Horses per acre. With supplemental hay & feed $4 to $8 per horse $25 to $150 or more per horse $200 to $400. $750 to $1,400. $25 to $65 $20 to $45 Not normally used on Miniature Horses. $375 to $1,500 Average Full-Sized Horse $1,000 to $3,000,000. Depending on gender, size, conformation, blood-line, and show record. Approximately $150 per month/horse. Includes hay and grain. $200 to $600 per month/horse. Varies according to facilities, pasture availability, riding opportunities. $550 & up per month/horse. Depends upon the reputation and demand of the trainer, stable & breed. Minimum 1 acre per horse. With supplemental hay & feed $12 to $18 per horse. $75 to $500 per horse. $350 to $4,000. $1,500 and up. $85 to $200 $40 to $75 $250 to $5,000 $1,000 to $5,000 8/27/2007 6:34 PM AMERICAN MINIATURE HORSE ASSOCIA nON Farrier Cost - Trimming Shoeing Suitability to Ride Suitability to Drive Health & Hardiness Life Span Veterinary Care Vaccinations Medications & Worming Suitability for Special Needs Individuals $10 to $18 per horse. Some owners do their own trimming due to the ease of handling Miniature Horses. No shoes Children up to 70lbs may ride depending on Miniature's age, height & body type. Riding generally not recommended. Children 3-4 years & up routinely drive at home, parades and in shows. Miniature Horses can easily pull up to 1-2 adults in a cart in all gaits, minimal experience is needed. Excellent - with good care. 20-30 Years Same as for larger horses. Determined by horse's weight - greatly reduced dosage for Miniatures. Greatly adaptable to individuals with Special Needs due to Miniature Horse's smaller size and affectionate nature. http://www.amha.orglindex.asp?KeyName~ I 23 Trim $30 to $50 per horse. Some very knowledgeable owners do their own trimming. $50 to $200 per horse. Children & adults can ride. Risk increases due to animal's size, training, rider experience. Children - questionable. Adults - dependent upon experience. Excellent - with good care. 20-30 Years Same as for Miniature Horses. Determined by horse's weight - 4-5 times the cost of Miniature Horses. Difficult for some individuals to handle due to larger size. CONTACT AMHA I AMHA MERCHANDiSE I WEB SITE SPONSORS I REGiONAL MAP '1i1!(ci'~1l~1J1jai!ll~1lll~Jl @ WWW @ www.amha.org CORPORATE SPONSORS: g~ll~orplO Metro Golf Cars Gencoro Ins Grouo Platform FeedinQ System 200 Double K Industries Estate Horse Su pply ~~~ Estate Horse Supolv TioQa T erritorv 8/27/2007 6:34 PM AMERICAN MINIATURE HORSE ASSOCIATION http://www.amha.org!index.asp?KeyName~ 123 NEWI Kee-POl1, InClA' EquiPage EqulFone ,....-" "" """~:" , I ~ DOUBLE DfA.l'\10ND l'Y!' I '\ (K ""- I Q t 1 P 1\11 \.J 1 Double Diamond Tack Eaui-Paae/Eaui-Fone Subscribe to AMHA-Members Email:1 Browse Archives at grOUPs.google,com AMHA - 5601 South Interstate 35 W - Alvarado, Texas, 76009 Phone (817)783-5600 - Fax (817)783-6403 -Information@amha.oro Copyrlght@1996-2007 American Miniature Horse Association, Inc. All rights reserved. 300 8/27/2007 6:34 PM AMERICAN MINIATURE HORSE ASSOCIATION http://www.amha.org/index.asp?KeyName~ I 2 I !1ASSOCIATION INFORMATION - BREED INFORMATION. FINANCE - GENETICS About The Breed BREED INFORMATION About The Breed I Standards J Big vs Small I Newcomer Facts I F. A. a. The result of nearly 400 years of selective breeding, historians tend to support the Miniature Horse breed as a derivative of many sources. In prehistoric times small horse breeds were most likely the products of surviving harsh natural climates and limited feed. Today, knowledge of genetics has made the possibility of breeding specifically for size a reality. The first mention of a small horse being imported into the United States was in 1888; and research shows little public awareness of true Miniatures until 1960. Popular belief is that American Miniature horses utilized the blood of English and Dutch mine horses brought into this country in the 19th century and used in some Appalachian coal mines as late as 1950. The American Miniature Horse, as documented in the pedigrees of Miniatures today, also drew upon the blood of the Shetland pony. Throughout its colorful past, the Miniature Horse breed had been bred for pets, novelty, research, monetary gain, mining work, exhibition and royal gifts. . Size. No bigger than a large dog, American Miniature Horses are "miniature" versions of well-balanced horses, possessing confirmation characteristics found in most equine breeds. Miniature Horses can be found in a rainbow of colors and types. . Personality. Eager to please, the American Miniature Horse makes a gentle and affectionate companion for individuals of any age or ability. . Versatility. Though petite, Miniature Horses are extremely versatile and excel in a variety of disciplines including driving, halter, jumping, obstacle and others. CONTACT AMHA I AMHA MERCHANDISE I WEB SITE SPONSORS I REGIONAL MAP ~I 1lll~Q.Qg11!~~~~il @ WWW @ www.amha.org CORPORATE SPONSORS: ~'''UIlUI:Y___) Metro Golf Cars .;.;.~~....t.~._~i,,~,. ,,:;'_'~"1F~"'.i." l:'~_-' '~"",\ t\... ..) ~~ .-~.,..1,;"d.~' - Platform Feedina SYStem Iof2 gm~orp" Estate Horse Supply ~-~ Gencoro Ins Group Estate Horse Supplv Double K Industries Tioga Territorv 8/27/20076:34 PM AMERICAN MINIATURE HORSE ASSOCIATION http://www.amha.orglindex.asp?KeyNarne= 121 NEWt Kee-POl1llnc,iIt EquiPage EqulFone Fo<l!i"9 Atlll'll\$' ~ II~ DOUBLE mArv[OND 1"F I '\ ( K & 1 Q LIP 1\1 L :\: 1 Double Diamond Tack Eaui-Paoe/Eaui-Fone Subscribe to AMRA-Members Email:1 ~1ifjJ1@J Browse Archives at grOUDs.google.com AMHA - 5601 South Interstate 35 W - Alvarado, Texas, 76009 Phone (817)783-5600 - Fax (817)783-6403 -Informationralamha.orq Copyrlght@1996-2007 American Miniature Horse Association, Inc. All rights reserved. 20f2 8/27/2007 6:34 PM AMERICAN MINIATURE HORSE ASSOCIATION http://www.amha.orglindex.asp?KeyN ame~ 125 100 IASSOCIATION INFORMATION - BREED INFORMATION - FINANCE - GENETICS BREED INFORMATION About The Breed I Standards I BID vs Small I Newcomer Facts I F. A. Q. Frequently Asked Questlons & Answers (FAQs) Q. I've just purchased my first Miniature and would like to know what and how much to feed it. A. Thankfully, Miniature Horses tend to thrive on pasture, sunshine and room to run and play. They are also prone to overeating, so ifs important to monitor their nutritional needs and avoid excessive food intake. At the same time, you want to provide nutrition appropriate to your geographical environment and to your horse's age and activity level. We recommend a call to your veterinarian and to some of the Miniature Horse trainers and breeders in your area for information specific to your location. I can fax you a copy of the breeders in your area from our current Breeders List. You might also want to visit our website where many breeders are listed. Another great source of information is the bi-monthly magazine, Miniature Horse World, provided as part of membershio In AMHA. Q. Is it okay to turn my Miniature Horse out with large horses? A. Ideally Miniature Horses should share their own pasture. While Miniature Horses have been known to successfully pasture with large horses, doing so adds a real and increased risk to the Miniature. One friendly or not-sa-friendly kick or bite from the large horse could significantly injure the Miniature. Q. Do people ride Miniature Horses? A. Miniature Horses should not be ridden by anyone over 70 pounds; however, Miniatures are extremely adept at learning to drive. Although small children are of the appropriate weight and many Miniature Horses are gentle and willing mounts, as with any combination of horse and child, caution is advised. Q. What can you do with a Miniature Horse? A. Practically anything you can do with a large horse (with exception of riding) including training, showing, breeding and having fun. American Miniature Horses are shown at halter, in-hand hunter~umper, obstacle, showmanship, single pleasure driving, country pleasure driving, roadster, multi-hitch driving, liberty and costume. Because of their size, relatively inexpensive upkeep, gentleness and affectionate natures they also make wonderful equine companions. Q. How much do Miniature Horses weigh? A. An average adult may weigh between 150-250 pounds. Q. Where did Miniature Horses come from? A. The result of nearly 400 years of selective breeding, historians tend to support the Miniature Horse breed as a derivative of many sources. In prehistoric times small horse breeds were likely the products of surviving harsh natural climates and limited feed. Today, knowledge of genetics has made the possibility of breeding specifically for size a reality. The first mention of a small horse being imported into the United States was in 1888; and research shows little public awareness of true Miniatures until 1960. Popular belief is that American Miniature Horses utilized the blood of English and Dutch mine horses brought into this country in the 19th century and used in some Appalachian coal mines as late as 1950. The American Miniature Horse, as documented in the pedigrees of Miniatures today, also drew upon the blood of the Shetland pony. Throughout its colorful past, the Miniature Horse breed has been bred for pets, novelty, research, monetary gain, mining work, exhibition and royal gifts. Q. Can you give me a list of Miniature Horse tack suppliers? 8/27/2007 6:34 PM AMERICAN MINIATURE HORSE ASSOCIA nON http://www.amha.orglindex.asp?KeyName~ 125 A. I would be happy to send you the "Horse For Evervone" booklet in which tack sponsor listings are included or fax you the listing page. You may also want to look for SDonsor links on our website. Q. Where can I buy a cart for a Miniature Horse? A. Visit local AMHA-aooroved shows and talk with exhibitors in the driving classes. Or, I would be happy to send you the "Horse For Evervone" booklet in which tack sponsor listings are included or fax you the listing page. You may also want to look for SDonsor links on our website. Q, Do Miniatures have more reproductive problems than big horses? A. Miniature Horses have been successfully reproducing for many years. Some deliveries, though, may be affected by the small size of a Miniature mare and, for that reason it is wise to not only practice good pre-natal care but to also monitor mares during actual foaling. Finding a veterinarian familiar with Miniature Horse anatomy and reproduction is also very important. Q. I want to donate my Miniature Horse to a good home - can you help? A. As an Association, we are not in the position to move, place or sell horses; however, I can give you the name of a contact in the AMHA aooroved-club in your area and they may be able to help. Q Is it true that Miniature Horses are used as guide horses for the blind? AMHA is not affiliated with the Guide Horse Foundation but we are aware of the press coverage in which such claims have been made. Q. How do I find more information about "guide horses"? A. You may want to do a search on the internet under the heading "guide horse". Q. I'm writing a book and need photos of Miniature Horses. Will you send me some? A. At this time, AMHA does not own copyrights of photos representative of the Miniature Horse. Photos used for promotional purposes for the Association are provided as a courtesy of AMHA Members. If you would like, we can provide you with breeders in your area for you to contact. Q. May I have permission to publish photos from your website? A. At this time, AMHA does not own copyrights of promotional photos. Photos used for marketing purposes for the Association are provided as a courtesy of AMHA Members. Your best source for photos and permission to publish them are individual Miniature Horse Breeders. Q. How do I subscribe to the Miniature Horse World maaazine? A. Contact the AMHA National Office at 817.783.5600 or e-mail infoCcilamha.orQ. Q. I am interested in purchasing a Miniature Horse and would like advice on how to locate a Miniature Horse breeder. 6. Become a member of AMHA to receive a bi-monthly magazine called the Miniature Horse World with ads from breeders all over the US. IT also shows the conformation of winning horses in some ofthe shows. The cost is $75 per year. 7. Take your time! learn as much as you can before you buy. Information is the key! A. A good start is to let AMHA send you the latest Breeders list so you may locate farms in your area. Other steps... 1. Check with multiple breeders. 2. locate an AMHA club in your area and talk to some of the AMHA Members. 3. Always measure the horse when you purchase it. AMHA transfer documents require both the buyer and setters signature to verify height. (AMHA will only register 34" and under) 4. Is the seller offering any sort of guarantee. Sometimes if you buy a mare in foal, the seller will guarantee a live foal and/or that the horse will not go over 34". 5. AMHA has a Studbook Online to research pedigrees for AMHA registered horses. If you are going for a speCific bloodline this should help you. 200 8/27/20076:34 PM AMERICAN MINIATURE HORSE ASSOCIATION http://www .arnha.org/index.asp?KeyName~ I 25 CONTACT AMHA I AMHA MERCHANDISE I WEB SITE SPONSORS I REGIONAL MAP ~G'''' "I @ WWW @ www.amha.~~lIJlt~~!OClll!&il CORPORATE SPONSORS: ~.IlftlIUini~) Metro Golf Cars Platform Feedina System g~~orp* Estate Horse Supply ~-- Gencoro Ins Group Estate Horse Supplv Double K Industries Tioaa Territorv NEWI Kee-POlt, InCIA EquiPage EquiFone -,.... t>. 'r'~ DOUBLE D1AI\10ND ~:y,J' I r\ { K .t~ I <1 l I I' f\l 1: :'\j 1 Double Diamond Tack Eaui-Paae/Eaui-Fone Subscribe to AMHA-Members Emaii:1 t,,~iiDS{,\jD~;&l Browse Archives at grouPs.google,com AMHA - 5601 South Interstate 35 W - Alvarado, Texas, 76009 Phone (817)783-5600 - Fax (817)783-6403 - Information@amha.oro Copyrlght@1996-2007 American Miniature Horse Association, Inc. All rights reserved. 300 8/27/20076:34 PM Miniature horse sales, breeding at T BAR T ranch in Texas For Sale Herd Sires New Arrivals Foals Stallions Mares Donkeys Puppies Geldings News Fun Photos Links Site Awa.rds GvestBook Mltllittg List LefPld Contact Us Map Home 10f6 ~ T Bar T Miniature Horses ... .. Fun Photos I Sign up on-ourmailiog list I JUST FOR FUN UPDATED; APR 26, 2006 Under the watchful eye of mother Sassy, Joyce Putman nuzzles tiny 2-week-old colt Willie Ray at her Rambling Rose Ranch in Clovis. Calif. Joy in her Easter Bonnet - picture courtesy of Kristy Wurtele, Paradise Ranch Curiosity and the Cat- Cjaruznature, Photo by Kristen Pidgeon Showing minis what happens if they pig out! - picture courtesy of Kristy Wurtele, Paradise Ranch http://www.tbart.net/events.cfin A Santa and T Bar T Helpers Joy Relaxing - picture courtesy of Kristy Wurtele, Paradise Ranch Ready for foaling season - pager in each ear! - picture courtesy of Kristy Wurtele, Paradise Ranch WHAT CAN YOU DO WITH A MINI? UPDATED: APR 5, 2006 8/27/2007 6:35 PM Miniature horse sales, breeding at T BAR T ranch in Texas http://www.tbart.net/events.cfin A photo display showing the many fun things you can do with a miniature horse! Thanks to Whites Mini Farm and Dakota Winds Farm for sharing some of these pictures. Click on any picture to make it larger. You Can Jump Them - Bob and National Champion, Fire Cracker They Can Be Guide Horses For The Blind You Can Love Them You Can Hug Them You Can Go Swimming With Them- photo courtesy of Dakota Winds Farm You Can Give the Easter Bunny A Ride - photo courtesy of Dakota Winds Farm You Can Go For A Sleigh Ride Small Kids Can Ride Them They Can Pray With You They Can Be Wheel Chair Buddies You Can Play Ball Play Dress Up OUR OTHER FRIENDS AND ANIMALS ADDED: SEP 18, 2005 20f6 8/27/2007 6:35 PM ~ ~HILLS MEMORANDUM DATE: September 5, 2007 PC Agenda Item 5.A TO: Planning Commission FROM: James Lehnhoff, City Planner SUBJECT: Comprehensive Plan Update The City held the first 200S Comprehensive Plan update meeting on August Sth at North Heights Church. There were an estimated 60-65 people in attendance, which is a good turn out for this type of a meeting. The information collected from that meeting is being summarized by City Staff, and the draft information may be ready to be distributed at the September Planning Commission meeting for initial review. This information will be used to help the Planning Commission, the City Council, Staff, and the hired develop potential policies, goals, and project priorities. This first community meeting helped us understand what the public is concerned about, ideas for projects, and what their future vision of Arden Hills includes. The next community-wide public meeting is tentatively set for October; however, a specific date has not been set. At their August 27t\ 2007, meeting, the City Council approved a quote from Bolton & Men, Inc. for transportation planning services for the 200S Comprehensive Plan update. The technical transportation data prepared by Bolton & Menk will be used to meet the Metropolitan Council's data requirements. Preparation of the technical data does not involve a public participation process; however, the data will be used during the public participation process to help inform the creation of policies and goals as well as set project priorities. In August, the City Council also approved a resolution to apply for $20,000 in grant money from the Metropolitan Council. The Metropolitan Council has approved the grant application, and the City will be using the money to off-set costs related to the Comprehensive Plan update, including the above transportation component. To obtain the most up-to-date information regarding the 200S Comprehensive Plan update process, please visit the City's website at www.ci.arden-hills.mn.us/compplan. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor September 5, 2007 \\Metro-inet.us\ardenhiJIs\Planning\Comprehensive Plan\PC Update Memos\090507 - PC Update.doc Page 1 ofl