The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About10-03-07-JOINT PC/CC Chair -- David Sand 1245 W. Highway 96 Commissioners ~HILLS Arden Hills, MN 55112 Andrew Holewa 651.792.7800 Clayton Larson Arden Hills www.ci.arden-hills.mn.U5 Liz Modesette Janet Stodola Planning Commission Roberta Thompson Clayton Zimmerman October 3, 2007 City Vision A strong community that values our unique environment, our fiscal soundness, and our tradition as a desirable citv in which to live, work, and plav. Agenda Joint Planning Commission/City Council Worksession Regarding Comprehensive Plan 5:30 PM Regular Planning Commission Convenes 6:30 PM Call to Order 1. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA 2. MINUTES A. September 5, 2007 Meeting 3. PLANNING CASES A. Planning Case 07-024; Conditional Use Permit Amendment; Sprint; 1230 Red Fox Road - Public Hearing B. Planning Case 07-028; Site Plan Review; Mounds View School District, Lake Valentine Elementary and Mounds View High School; - Not a Public Hearing C. Planning Case 07-018; Master Planned Unit Development, Final Planned Unit Development for Phase 1, Preliminary Plat, and Final Plat; Arden Plaza LLC; 3527 Lexington Ave N - Public Hearing D. Planning Case 06-037; Campus Master Planned Unit Development; Northwestern College; 3003 Snelling Ave N - Public Hearing E. Planning Case 07-025; Zoning Code Text Amendment for RV Storage; City of Arden Hills; 1245 West Highway 96 - Public Hearing F. Planning Case 07-026; Zoning Code Text Arnendment for the Definition of Floor Area; City of Arden Hills; 1245 West Highway 96 - Public Hearing G. Planning Case 07-027; Zoning Code Text Amendment to Add Design Guidelines for the B-2: General Business District; City of Arden Hills; 1245 West Highway 96 - Public Hearing 4. UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS A. Tree Preservation 5. REPORTS A. 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update B. Report from the City Council C. Planning Commission Comments and Requests 6. ADJOURNMENT A quorum of the City Council may be present at this meeting. Planning Cases are available online at: http://www.ci.arden-hills.mn.us/planninQcases MEMORANDUM DATE: October 3, 2007 PC Agenda Item 3.A TO: Planning Commission Meagan Beekman, Planner I t. James Lehnhoff, City Plann'lf7 FROM: SUBJECT: Planning Case #: 07-024 Conditional Use Permit Amendment Baran Telecom, Agent for Sprint/Nextel (Richard Markus) 1230 Red Fox Road ATTACHMENTS: 3A-I Application and Supporting Materials 3A-2 City Engineer Review 3A-3 Air Photos and photographs Requested Action The applicants have requested a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) amendment to remove four cell antennason the city water tower located at 1230 Red Fox Road, and replace them with two new antennas at a height of 154 ft. In order to accommodate the new antennas, three Nextel antennas, located on the same site, will be removed and replaced with two new ones. Back!!round 1. Overview of Request: The applicants have requested a conditional use permit (CUP) amendment to Planning Case #00-05 to remove four antennas located at the water tower at 1230 Red Fox Road and replace them with two antennas at a greater height. Sprint currently has six antennas installed on this water tower. Two of these antennas are mounted at the 60 foot level, two are mounted at the 80 foot level, and two are mounted at the 100 foot level. The applicant proposes to remove the four antennas at the 60 foot and 100 foot levels. The two antennas at the 80 feet level City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for October 3, 2007 \\Metro-inet.us\ardenhills\PlanninglPlanning Cases\2007107-024 Sprint-Nextel CUP Amendment\l00307 - PC Report Sprint CUP Amendment.doc Page 1 of 8 would remain. The removed antennas would then be replaced with two new antennas, which would be relocated to a new height of 154 feet. In order to make room for the two new proposed antennas at the 154 foot level, which is the top of the water tower, Nextel will replace three of its existing antennas, currently located at a height of 159 feet, with two new antennas that would be at a height of 158 feet. There are no proposed changes to the existing ground equipment at the site. The result of this CUP amendment would be a net reduction in the number of cell antennas located on this water tower. Background When the lease agreements for the Sprint antennas and for the Nextel antennas were approved, Sprint and Nextel were separate companies. Those two companies have since merged, which is why they are able to reach an agreement on the proposed antenna rearrangement. A CUP amendment is not needed to remove the three Nextel antennas and replace them with the two Nextel antennas because they can replace equipment within their leased area. A CUP amendment is only needed if they increase the total number of antennas or move the antennas to area on the water tower outside of the approved lease area. The Sprint antennas would be moving outside of their previously approved leased area, which is the primary reason for this CUP amendment request. In 1996, N extel was granted a conditional use permit to install three fifteen foot antennas on the side of the City water tower at 1230 Red Fox Road. In 1998, they received permission from the City, via a lease agreement amendment, to remove these antennas and replace them with nine panel antennas, each nine feet long, to be located at the top of the water tower and connected to the guard rail. These antennas were at a height of 159 ft. In 2000, Sprint was granted a conditional use permit to install antennas on the side of the water tower at heights between 60 and 100 feet. Also in 2000, the City adopted an ordinance amendment and master landscape plan (planning Case #00-028) addressing the use of cell antennas on City water towers, which regulates the placement of antennas on City water towers (Section 1325.09). 2. Surrounding Area: North Industrial I-FLEX Vacant South Industrial I-FLEX Light Industrial East Industrial B-4 Light Industrial West Industrial I-FLEX Light Industrial City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor October 3,2007 \\Metro-inet.uslardenhills\PlanningIPlanning Cases\2007\07-024 Sprint-Nextel CUP Amendmentll00307 -PC Report - Sprint CUP Amendment.doc Page 2 of8 3. Site Data: Industrial Institutional I-FLEX .69 Acres (30,056.4 sf) The parcel is generally flat Plan Evaluation 1. General Zoning Regulations Regulation: Height - (Section 1325.09 Subd 3D) -"on city water towers, antennas placed on the top ofthe tower shall not exceed the height ofthe tallest existing antenna placed at that location. " Proposal: The water tower at 1230 Red Fox Road, also known as the South Tower, is approximately 150 ft tall. The proposed antennas will be mounted at the top of the tower. The Sprint antennas themselves are 4 ft 4 inches tall and so will be at a total height of 154 feet, four inches. The current Nextel antennas are each nine feet in height and located at the top of the tower. The proposed replacement Nextel antennas would be eight feet in height and similarly located. The proposed antennas would not exceed the height of the tallest existing antennas. Regulation: Location - (Section 1325.09 Subd 4) - antennas shall be located on sites or buildings in areas that are the least obtrusive to nearby properties and public streets. Proposal: The South Tower has been identified as a reasonable place to locate cell antennas in the past due to is location and proximity to industrial uses. The proposed plan will result in a net decrease in the number of cell antennas located on the water tower. However, the plan will also increase the number of antennas located on the top ofthe tower where they are the most visible from neighboring properties and the public right of way. This will be mitigated by painting the antennas a similar color to the water tower, which is required by the Zoning Code. Regulation - Number of Antennas or Towers - (Section 1325.09 Subd 5B) -- "On City water towers, the number of antennas permitted on the structure and ground will be determined but the requirements outlined in Section 1320.06 of the Zoning Code and is structurally allowable" . Proposal - The Zoning Code does not specify the numbers of or requirements for antennas permitted on City water towers. According to letters from the applicant's engineers, the guardrails that the antennas would be mounted on are structurally sufficient to handle the proposed changes. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for October 3, 2007 \\Metro-inet.uslardenhillslPlanninglPlanning Cases\2007\07-024 Sprint-Nextel CUP Amendment\100307 - PC Report - Sprint CUP Amendment.doc Page 3 of8 Regulation: Screening -{Section 1325.09 Subd. 6) - City code requires that antennas on water towers be painted to match the color ofthe water tower. Proposal: There is no additional screening required because there are not any changes to the ground equipment. 2. I-FLEX Zone Regulations - Antennas are permitted as a conditional accessory use in this zoning district. 3. Conditional Use Permit Amendment - Section 1355.04 Subd 3 Section 1355.04 Subd 3 ofthe Arden Hills Zoning Code lists the criteria for evaluating a Conditional Use Permit. The Planning Commission and City Council shall consider the effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety, convenience and general welfare ofthe owners and occupants of the surrounding land, in particular, and the community as a whole, in general, including but not limited to the following factors: I. Existing and anticipated traffic and parking conditions; 2. Noise, glare, odors, vibration, smoke, dust, air pollution, heat, liquid or solid waste, and other nuisance characteristics; 3. Drainage; 4. Population density; 5. Visual and land use compatibility with uses and structures on surrounding land; adjoining land values; 6. Park dedications where applicable; and the 7. Orderly development of the neighborhood and the City within the general purpose and intent of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Development Plan for the City. Special Requirements for City Water Tower Sites - Section 1325.09 Subd 7 The placement oflicensed commercial wireless telecommunication services, including cellular, personal communication services (PCS), specialized mobilized radio (SMR), enhanced mobilized radio (ESMR), paging and similar services on water sites will be allowed only when the City is fully satisfied that the following requirements are met: 1. The applicant's access to the facility will not increase the risks of contamination to the City's water supply; 2. There is sufficient room on the structure and/or on the grounds to accommodate the applicant's facility; 3. The presence of the facility will not increase the water tower or reservoir maintenance costs to the City; and, 4. The presence of the facility will not be harmful to the health of workers maintaining the water tower or reservoir. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for October 3, 2007 \\Metro-inet.us\ardenhillsIPlanning\Planning Cases\2007\07-024 Sprint-Nextel CUP AmendmentlI00307 -PC Report ~ Sprint CUP Amendment.doc Page 4 of 8 The applicant has submitted two letters from Henry Bellagamba, an engineer with Fullerton Engineering Consultants who prepared the engineering drawings for the proposed plans (Attachment 3A-l). According to these letters, the proposed changes to the antenna configuration on the water tower will not exceed the structural capacity of the guardrails on which they would be mounted and that by engineering judgment the existing guardrail structure is adequate. 4. Additional Information The City Public Works Director has reviewed the project and submitted a memo dated May 23,2007 with recommended conditions. These have been included as conditions for approval. The Public Works Director does not anticipate structural issues associated with this proposed project. Findin!!s of Fact The Planning Commission must make a finding as to whether or not the proposed cell tower changes meets the requirements of the Zoning Code and if it would adversely affect the surrounding neighborhood or the community as a whole. Staff offers the following seventeen findings for consideration: General Findings: 1. The proposed antennas would not exceed the height of the tallest existing antenna. 2. Cell antennas are a permitted accessory use on City water towers. 3. Cell antennas are a conditionally accessory use in the I-Flex District 4. The proposed antennas are compatible with the character of the area and will not adversely impact the surrounding properties 5. The total number ofSprintlNextel antennas on the water tower will decrease to twelve from fifteen; however, the number of antennas located on the top of the water tower will mcrease. 6. The guardrails on which the antennas will be mounted are structurally capable of handling the additional load. On the Conditional Use Permit Evaluation Criteria: 7. The proposed plan would not have any impact on traffic or parking conditions 8. The proposed plan will not produce any permanent noise, glare, odors, vibration, smoke, dust, air pollution, heat, liquid or solid waste, and other nuisance characteristics 9. The proposed plan will not impact drainage 10. The proposed plan will not impact population density 11. The proposed plan is not expected to have a significant impact on visual and land use compatibility with uses and structures on surrounding land or adjoining land values 12. Park dedications are not applicable City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor October 3, 2007 \\Metro-illet.us\ardenhills\PlanningIPlanning Cases\2007\07-024 Sprint-Nextel CUP Amendment\100307 -PC Report - Sprint CUP Amendment.doc Page 5 of8 13. The proposed plan does not conflict with the general purpose and intent of the zoning code or the Comprehensive Development Plan for the City. The applicant's access to the facility will not increase the risks of contamination to the City's water supply; On the Special Requirementsfor City Water Towers: 14. The proposed plan is not anticipated to have any impact on the risks of contamination to the City's water supply 15. With the replacement of the Nextel antennas there will be sufficient room on the structure to accommodate the applicant's proposed antennas 16. The proposed plan is not anticipated to increase the water tower or reservoir maintenance costs to the City 17. The proposed plan will not be harmful to the health of workers maintaining the water tower or reservoir. Notice Notice was published in the Arden Hills/Shoreview Bulletin and notice was prepared by the City and mailed to residents within three-hundred fifty (350) feet ofthe subject property. Resident Comments At this time the City has not received any comments from the public regarding this project. Staff Recommendation Staffrecommends approval of Planning Case #07-024 for a Conditional Use Permit Amendment at 1230 Red Fox Road subject to the following twelve conditions: 1. The project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. 2. The antennas and all mounts shall be painted to match the color ofthe water tower. 3. Upon removal of any equipment the applicant shall repair all holes, scratches, rust, or damage to the tower caused by the supports from these antennas and the tower shall be repainted with primer and matching paint to ensure that the metal is protected. 4. A building permit shall be obtained for all proposed antennas prior to installation. 5. At the time the new antennas are placed on the water tower those that have been identified for removal shall be removed. 6. The applicant shall comply with the City Engineer's memo dated May 23, 2007 7. The City Attorney shall draft a conditional use permit amendment that shall be signed by the applicant prior to the issuance of any building permits. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor October 3,2007 \\Metro-inet.us\ardenhillsIPlanning\Planning Cases\2007\07-024 Sprint-Nextel CUP Amendment\100307 - PCReport - Sprint CUP Amendment.doc Page 6 of8 8. The Sprint antennas shall not be moved and building permits shall not be issued until a revised lease agreement is approved by the City Council. 9. All cables associated with this project shall be properly secured and will not impede the use of the access tube to the water tower. 10. The applicant shall cover the access holes with removal steel screen covers or caps that are properly secured, so future operators may still access the holes into the tower. 11. Applicant agrees to vacate any access rights to those areas of the water tower where antennas have been removed. 12. Any termination of the lease agreement will lead to a termination of the Conditional Use Permit. Options & Proposed Motion Lan!!ua!!e 1. Recommend Approval with Conditions: Motion to recommend avvroval of Planning Case 07-024 for a Conditional Use Permit amendment at 1230 Red Fox Road based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans as amended by the twelve conditions in the October 3,2007, planning case report 2. Recommend Approval as Submitted: Motion to recommend avvroval of Planning Case 07- 024 for a Conditional Use Permit amendment at 1230 Red Fox Road based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans as presented in the October 3,2007, planning case report. 3. Recommend Denial: Motion to recommend denial of Planning Case 07-024 for a Conditional Use Permit amendment at 1230 Red Fox Road based on the following findings: findings to deny should specifically reference the reasons for denial and why those reasons cannot be mitigated. 4. Table: Motion to table Planning Case 07-024 for a Conditional Use Permit amendment at 1230 Red Fox Road: a specific reason and information request should be included with a motion to table. Deadline for A!!encv Actions The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on September 4, 2007. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statue, the City must act on this request by November 3, 2007 (60 days), unless the city provides the petitioner with written reasons for an additional 60 day review period. The City may, with the consent of the applicant, extend the review period beyond the initial 120 days. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor October 3, 2007 \\Metro-inet.us\ardenhillsIPlanningIPlanning Cases\2007\07-024 Sprint-Nextel CUP Amendment\100307 -PC Report - Sprint CUP Amendment.doc Page 7 of8 Attachments 3A-I 3A-2 3A-3 Application and supporting materials City Engineer Review Air photos and Photographs City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for October 3, 2007 \lMetro-inet.uslardenhillsIPlanninglPlanning Cases\2007\07-024 Sprint-Nextel CUP Amendment\100307 - PC Report- Sprint CUP Amendment.doc Page 8 of8 Attachment 3A-l ~ ~HILLS Supporting Documents from the Applicant October 3,2007, Planning Commission Meeting II BARAN telecom Richard Markus 16 Treebeard Circle Sl. Charles, MO 63303 314-913-0603 :;c') .~ .'. on07 \):-'1 !~: (UU "" __n H:[[s Tuesday, August 28, 2007 James Lehnhoff, AICP City Planner & Recycling Coordinator City of Ard.en Hills 1245 West Highway 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112 Direct: (651) 792-7819 Re: CUP Amended for Sprint antennas on city water tower located at 1230 Red Fox Road. Sprint Site MS14XC859 Mr. Lehnhoff, Sprint currently has (6) antennas installed between the 60 ft level and the 100 ft level on the above referenced water tower. (2) antennas are mounted at the 60 ft level, (2) antennas are mounted at the 80 ft level and (2) antennas are mounted at the 100 ft level. Sprint desires to remove the antennas at the 60 ft and 100 ft levels and replace those with (2) new antennas, which shall be relocated to a new height of 152 ft on the existing guardrail structure. The (2) existing antennas at the 80 ft level remain as is. The final configuration will consist of a total of (4) antennas, (2) antennas at 80 ft and (2) antennas at 152 ft. In order to make room for the 2 new proposed Sprint antennas Nextel has agreed to replace 3 of its existing antennas with 2 new antennas. This will allow space for the new proposed Sprint antennas at the 152 ft level on the tower. There will be no changes to the existing ground equipment. Enclosed you will find the following: 1. A completed Land Use Application requesting an amendment to the CUP 2. Signed and stamped structurallelters 3. 2 sets of signed and sealed drawings 4. 4 copies of the amendment to the lease agreement 5. A check made payable to the City of Arden Hills for $300.00 CUP Amend Fee Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this proposed modification. Thank you, /#&?$tL Richard Markus Baran Telecom, Agent for SprintlNextel Project Manager 16 Treebeard Circle St. Charles, MO 63303 314-913-0603 Office/Cell 636-441-0387 Fax ~ ~HlLLS 1245 West Highway 96 Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112 Telephone (651) 792-7800 Fax (651) 634-5137 www.ci.arden-hills.mn.us Planning Case No. Submittal Date Application Completed Date Accepted by Receipt Number Council Decision Council Decision Date 2007 LAND USE APPLICATION Applicant Information Applicant .'''If'>(lnti\\e:.'i.-\-e\ (rn\\1Cl.-C,t ~\dro\Q\ lY\o..y\l,~s J Address: \..93 \ ;nt- Vo.(\'-, ~ a",Q..{"'O.\\d. \:>Cl..<v.. \1,0..,,30--': d5\ 1'-1. Other: Fax No.: (","',l\)- L\L\I- ():?,<1,i EmaiIAddress:(.(Y.()..h..^~.d m,n.,r-,\EO.\ffAY" r.iJ1"Y> Property Information Property Owner: 0..-\ + I Jot (~y c4 f' n \ '-\ c,-\c Owner T ele hone No. '" '- 19 - 115 other: Address of Property Involved: \ d?lD Re.d ~()'f-.. Kcl. A (6. E'Y> \~; \ \<:; \V\../--l f)S\ \d-. ) Legal Description: S ",-co A ++r~cl>o e..d Property ID No: C), 1- ~()- ri?.,- Ll.d - COD\ Type of Use: Zone: I Property Acreage: Type of Reauest" LJ Apportionment of Assessments ($30) LJ Comprehensive Plan Amendment ($400) ~ Conditional Use Permtt or Amended CUP ($300) LJ Final Plat ($200 + $25 per lot) LJ Final Planned Unit Development ($200) LJ Master Planned Untt Development ($600 + escrow) LJ Minor Subdivision (lot splil/consolidation) ($300) LJ Preliminary Plat ($400 + $25 per lot + escrow) LJ Rezoning ($400) LJ Stte Plan Review ($400) LJ Stte Plan Review (Sign or Fence) ($250) LJ Vacation of Easement or Right-of-Way ($250 + escrow) LJ Variance (Zoning Code) ($300) LJ Zoning Code Amendment ($300 + escrow) Revised: 01-30-07 Page 1 of3 "Applicants are responsible for reimbursement of consultant fees associated with filing, reviewing, and processing of this appiication. Such fees are to be paid in escrow up front or upon receipt of statement from the City of Arden Hills. Fees include costs for consultants retained by the Ctty and include consuttant planning services, attorney, and engineer. "Payment of park dedication fees are required with the approval of most subdivision applications. "The land use application fees do not cover building, sign, or other permit fees that may be required upon approval of a land use application. "Certain applications are subject to review and approval by the Rice Creek Watershed District. Contact RCWD directly at 763-398- 3070 for additional information. Brief Description of Request (please also inciude a tvped. detailed letter explainina the proiect): ,c:,Vin{;'5 rer\l'f');::\ijll.no.YY1en('\rnen+ tD-I\0~ C',\J.P-l-\o.c>~ \<J""l"\ (\\\0") 0f>,i\\+ -\"(') iA~.k. II [;)\ o..'II\I:.'i""\N'I."-. (\\~e. \\is;::) {()(")\ kve.\ QlX"\ tYee '-'-'0.hK -i o.x--- "d. oj. \= a '- \\Do.cl \- "'-o.S OcY\te. I ex Ie e € . f lUll \ rt(\r\('),)p (~\ of -I-Yce.se. px.i d., ns Qnkn0"'-c, 11 VIal ;("\~-\0,1 \ I~ \ nf u. I G-Y\te(\(\o.." n.+ "Yee. \S;;) +-oc.J 'eve-I. (~I exis/in3 omlennQ}, oJ./-J-zt> So 1001 levcl r,Ji I) rema.in as /8 :r;; o~oler 10 WIn /Ge /"{rorY' -PaY -ft-tc .;2 r1ei..u f'rCJpl'hed SflVii1-1- an/Erina <: ~:!::;( has. oJyecd -fe) re'p/a.c.e- ;"?,, f /fs eXit;lil'Jj Q/J/e;Jt1G..S oj +h.tf 1S-:;zIPDof k'rJ~/ wifh ,;;2 nef..<) an/el1.Ylo t'>. ~/ FilinQ & Information Requirements The City requests that you make a pre-application meeting with the City Planner to discuss the application process, requirements, and deadlines. Unless waived by the City Planner or Plannin9 Commission, a certified survey of the property is required for aH applications. The Planning Commission andlor City Council may still require a certified survey. A checklist for other required information is also available. Complete/Incomplete Applications An incomplete application will delay the processing of land use requests. The application approval time commences and an application is considered officially filed when the City Planner has received and examined the application and determined that the application is complete. A decision on whether the application is complete or incomplete shaH be made within fifteen (15) working days following the submittal of the application. When the application is deemed to be 'complete" it shall be placed on the agenda ot the first possible Planning Commission meeting provided that all required public notices have been sent and pubiished. Payment of Fees The undersigned acknowiedges that shelhe understands that before a land use application can be deemed compiete, aH required information and fees (including all deposits) must be paid to the City. If addttional fees are required to cover costs incurred by the City, the City Planner has the right to require addttional payment from one or more of the undersigned, who shall be jointly liable for such fees. Such expenses may include (but are not limited to) direct ctty payroll and overhead costs, fees paid to consuttants and other professionals, and the cost of printing, mailing, and supplies. The City may withhold final action on a land use application, withhold building permits, andlor rescind prior action until all miscellaneous fees have been paid. Applicants are advised that an escrow deposit is required at the time of the submittal of the land use application to offset costs associated with the proposed project. Unused portions of an escrow are returned to the applicant upon successful implementation of an approved plan. Notice of MeetinQ Attendance In order for the Planning Commission and the City Council to consider any application, the applicant or a designated representative must be present at the scheduled meeting. If not, the matter may be tabled until the next available agenda. Flevised:OI-30-07 Page 2 of3 Aaenda Deadline and Meetina Schedule The deadline for submittal of land use applications is required according to the schedule outlined below. There are no exceptions. Planning Commission meetings are typically held on the first Wednesday of each month at 7:00 PM, though please contact City Hall to verify the meeting date and time. City Council meetings are held typically the last Monday of the same month at 7:00 PM. Meetings are held in the Council Chambers at the City of Arden Hills, 1245 West Highway 96, Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112, unless otherwise stated. Applicants are advised that additional meetings andlor workshops are scheduled when necessary upon approval of the Planning Commission. 2007 SCHEDULE ('subject to change) TENTATIVE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING" (Generally held on the first Wednesda at 7:00 .m. . . Janua 10 20. Wednesda Februa 7 TENTATIVE CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE" (Generally held on the last Monda at 7:00 .m. March 5 A ril4 June 6 November 5 December 3 October 3 October 29 Acknowledgement and Sianature I acknowledge that I have read all of the information listed in the City of Arden Hills Land Use Application and fully understand that I am responsible for all costs incurred by the City related to the processing of this application. Property Owner Signature (Required) Date /~{{?4ltL P~29-0? Date Applicant Signature (If different than the property owner) Please contact the City Planner at (651) 762-7819 or by email atiames.lehnhoff@cLarden-hills.mn.usif you have any questions regarding this application. Additional copies of this application form are available on the City's website: httD://www.ciarden-hilfs.mn.us Revised: 01-30-07 Page 3 of 3 Site Description Site situaled in the City of Arden Hills, County of Ramsey, Slate of Minnesota, commonly described as foI~ Prooertv le<!al OescIiDtion: The North 240 feel of the East 150 feel of \he Northwest One Quarter of the Southeast One Quarter, (subject to roads) in Section 27, Townsl1ip30. Range 23, Ramsey County. Minnesota. Leased Premises and Access Easement Leaal DeSCliolion: f'P-5"A'.D P.HlN7$.I'S Ut::a .D.I'$C~O...f(o That port of !he H...H......t One CluaItBr of Ute SoutIIecnot One ~rter d Sadlon XI. T-.hlp 30. R_ ZJ .sc:ribod all fallows: 1he SoulIl 2D.OO feet ", tI10 North 220.00 fHl of..... w...t 20.110 INl of .... fiat 94JIO liIet of _lei ...... lit One QuarW ", .... llouUloaot One aua.w of !ectIon ~. TOlIlIlIIlIp JO. Imp 2J, IlilInule1 CaunIr linn"""'" AC&'ISS .&ISrlrHr ~ DIS&.W/..P.77D.N.' A 20.00 _.... aM..... ...........1 _. u_. and__ the No.lI..._"t OM QuaNr of tI10 Swll_ Onoo Quarter of Sec:l.ian 27. TownehIp JO. Rant* 23. 1I\e ceIlter _ of lICIid 20.00 fvcI. ........ GJKI .... r C" r 5 INtlt fa d.8C~ r . _ foJIon; Commtnc/II9 at lIIe .Al1'" mlt __ of the ~ One QuarWt at tIMI ~ One a-ter" of eafd Sectlan 27: ~ Sauth 88 ....... .. m/I1_ Z1 __ w..t 411 WI o""""*' -rln9 oIong lIIe North line of the Notlhb_d One QuerW of Ill. ~ One CluarIor a _.. 01 1.tO.OO teet to tile pomt of lIeQIArlng; lItenae ....... oe .-.- 31 ........ 42 ,m".. €"ast .. ......- 01 f7ll. f7 flIel; ~ along a "";clllal _ __ to the llIIItf.~_ IMMnO .. _w 01 GO flIet. a _ GngIa 01 88 __ 43 mIII.- 3' ..concIf and CII"C lenaIh of 54'" feat. a cl.d <llIliance of 4e.Jll _ and .. chanI 1Iearinv of SooNl ..., ....... !l8 mInutlla J8 .. ".elI EoaI; ~ Ncrtn 88 __ lit .......... %1 __ EG8t II dIslImce of 11.18 flllll IIIld tIion bn.......lIl11J. MIA. . THE PROPERl'Y OOM'AINS 30.(100.0 SQUARE FUr OR OM ACRES. .M'ASI A/M}l' 1HE lEASE _ CONTAINS 400.00 SOUARE FEET OR 0.01 ACRES. . ~~!~r~-!~I~nts Phone (847) 292 - 0200 FaH (847) 292 - 0206 9700 W. Higgins Road. Suite 800 Rosemont. Illinois 60018 Fu Ilertoneng Ineerlng.com ~ _~ _ _ 0 June 22, 2007 Mr. John Gettrust Sprint 400 W. Grand Ave. Elmhurst, Illinois. 60126 RE: Sprint Site MSI4XC859-A Arden Hills WT 1230 Red Fox Road Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112 Dear Mr. Gettrust, Reference is made to the attached Fullerton Engineering Drawings (dated June 14,2007). . Regarding the installation of antennas at the top of the water tank: In one sector, three (3) existing antennas (96.25" x 7.75" x 2.75") will be replaced by two (2) new EMS FR90-13-00DBL2 antennas (96" x 12" x 7"). We have calculated the wind loads on the antennas and determined the wind load on the new antennas to be slightly less than that on the existing antennas. Accordingly, the replacement antennas will be satisfactory. If you have any questions con ems, please do not hesitate to contact us. .43012 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I m a duly Licensed Professional En . e under the laws of the State of Minnes Print Name: Date: 012 . ~~!!'~-!~~n~ Phone (847) 292 - 0200 FaH (847) 292 - 0206 9700 W. Higgins Road, Suite BOO Rosemont, Illinois 6001B Fullertonengmeenng corn " ^ - ^ ~ ~ , ' June 15,2007 Mr. John Gettrust Sprint 400 W. Grand Ave. Elmhurst, Illinois. 60126 RE: Sprint Site MS14XC859-A Arden Hills WT 1230 Red Fox Road Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112 Dear Mr. Gettrust, Reference is made to the attached Fullerton Engineering Drawings (dated June 14,2007). . Regarding the installation of antennas: Two (2) new KMW HB-X-PA-17-65-00T (L51.93in x ~6.l4in @ 20.0 lbs.) antennas will be installed @ 152.0 ft AGL on the existing guardrail structure to replace four (4) existing antennas and antenna frames @ 60.0 ft AGL (sector 1) and @ 100.0 ft AGL (sectors 2). Two (2) existing antennas and antenna frame @ 80.0 ft AGL (sector 3) are to remain. The total wind load and dead load per antenna (for new antennas) is smaller than 200 lb (OSHA required minimum guardrail design point load). Therefore by engineering judgement the existing guardrail structure is adequate. Since, the new antenna elevation is higher than the existing there is an increase of the wind pressure on the antennas and the arm of the wind force for bending moment. Therefore, the overall wind load on the existing water tower is greater. A comparison between water tank - no equipment configuration and water tank - project configuration shows: Bending Moment increase by 4.11 % Axial Load increase by 0.02% Shear Load increase by 2.56% of water tower base loads due to antennas and equipment (see attached calculations). Therefore by engineering judgement existing water tower structure is adequate. . Regarding the installation of new I relocation of existing coaxial cables: Four (4) existing coaxial cables will be removed and replaced by four (4) new I 5/8" coaxial cables (sectors 1 & 2). The other existing coaxial cables to remain (sector 3 All cables routed inside, new penetration @ access hatch plate is needed (see details). If you have any questions or concerns, plea e do not hesitate to contact us. I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Print Name: HEN BA Signature: License # 43012 Date: ] g ~ ~ ~ <llOC r\ , ~ <:[ . f- ~~ :5 ~ ... --'W cP~ ~~ W ~.~~ ~~ ~ --'3 W I' I: ,.; CI i IO UI'" x~ ; ~ ~ ~ lll~ I ..... oS3 , ~ f- 2cn' <ll , c: ....0)- ~~ moc ll~ oj ~ ,S ~ . ~ f- .~ :::""C: 'l'w X' ~i W I.... OC 0 ~:! d . -. ~ OW 'tZ ~. --' 0.. """"u 6~ . . - i ! . ! OCf- (j)I: o~ f- ~ ~'" ii' U <:[~ . III ~~ I: f- I I. < 0 . ~ 0 . 0 ~ 3 . 0 ~ ~ . . , . Q Z ~ ffi . Q . ~ . )- ~ 0 ~ 0 . ~ < 0 . Q OC 3 . , f- 0 ~ ~ . <:[ . X <:[ . ~ j ~ Q . I: ~ 2 1: . . . i ~ ~ . " ~ ,." 1: . 0 c OC z < z " ~ . z :::J ~ < . z () . , ~ x ~ ~ . . . . <l) " < IL E . . E . . ~ 0 . 0 . " 0" " " , f- 0 II f- ;. Q ~ " .e " 0: W u i ~~ " -, - z ~ " I W ~ -< 0 . 3 -, ~ .~ <; E - " () ~ 0 . 0 'e " 2 lL m 0 OC ~o E< 0 ~ '" . > " o~ Z E 0 ffi . lL "< 0 0 . 6 0 " Ex .~ 3' . . Z Z . < & xo .0 ~ X . . . ~ ~/;1 ~~ . e e z. " . " " " < . h ,. 0 Q) ~ +J 0 >< -~ c.- Q) 0'0 OJ C\J Z +:; >. 0 ~ E::i;;: '" -- ~ ro .,. J: 13 Q)~- (I)"'O::J Q) +J I- c.c"'O..c .- Z IJ):::J _ 3: <.f) 0.': <[ ill ..~ m ~ cO OJ lo. ....JW ~ 1: .!!!OJE'O I ill a.E"'5 Q) ~ 'UI ....J3 (Jl OUl II _~ >o- J: OCz '<:..0_ - () ill 01 ill ill <1: - "'OJ +J "I ! ~ ill XI: (l 1Ua1.;; c . ..- Q) ill (\) ill O. }- --1 ~ 01 ~ ~ -- C'.) L.. '0..0 t- O ~ 0 1L<ll ~ [l.. -5["'O~""'I z ill 0.': 0 --' u ill ~Q) ~w ~ 0 ill " 0--' ill ~ XI WI , OC .- k C <ii ill 0 t::c.cmc. I- ~ OCz 01 CD (I') 0 C.- a. OW 'tZ <ii ~w (l <1: <.l "'._ 0:;0;; E -I:: "'0 z >. 3: .!!l-Ci) - ro :::J o.':t- .o_>(J)oZ - <.f) ~OC Z Q)"'~Q)(]) '" i1i <[~ <:[ ill "'0(1)_ - c I:: ~ c.c.orn.5 Ol iii Vl I- Q)::J~_k (jj Z /0-0 (I') o..(/.) 0- 0 <1: ~ :i~ !~~ 8~ 0 " . "- <l) H t " z Z '. 6 Q .~ @ () ~o " X " lL f- ~ ., . W >- <:[ N 3^\f NO~<JNIX31 0 0 U . .' . . 0 0 ID W , ~ o' I: x x ~ OC z' -x 2 2 00 }- z. 0 C 0 . Ell: "0 !:: ~ f- it!:;O .. . W ~. ~ 0 W ~ ~ 00 U ~ I Z ~~ ~ ): 0 ): <ll " ~~ ii: ~ ~ W . 0 ~~ f- 0 0 c_ ~ 8 ,Z <ll w .0 0 . e ~oc .. co 0 " .. " ~ u u -' x, z "c h --..--.-..."...---- 0 , . . . <o{l' ~!!l 'I <( r\ . ~~ . -lW , ~:R z "~ _.s~ l"~ ~~ L , oo!3 '" ,!) ~~ 0, ~ a ~ <( ~;;; ~.oi ,I' , 0 ill N d .z ~ I ..... ." ........0: ~~ ~~ ~~ ~Q~ <Il Q 2<li ~ -l Oo~ f- lL C ~' ~o- ~~ ~* <1 ffi{l' II Q 0" '" ... ~ ::! . ~ II .~ <~ O).~ '" ~~ 1~ :1 X , ~, ~ ~~ = ~o::: W I... Ho jl ~.~ ,Ii . !\ . OW :! z ~~ f- 0. ~~u ow ., ,Ii {l'f- L "~ to Jil: g ~~ n rl~ ! ! , i " i <0 V1 ! a <(~ L < " , 1[,. ! 0 . " 0 ~ .~~u <. ~9>-91 ,. U.~: "U ~~ l" t ti~ .~2 ~w .uw ~:g . ,. ~~~3 ~~ ~.1l1It: <" ....~cr o..x~ . ~~ ~~~" ~~,~ ww . U" ~~~t ~~~w !z~ ww~ .~ J::Z~li L i~iI~ .. 3' "'~ wo w<. ~u i~='.... o~ ~~~~ 2.h ~<Sl<[~ -<ll ~<tUJ ~ftOC X(J<t ~ .' .~ ~~ Uo ~" ''; E~ ~Q ~~ f. .~ ~~ ~w ~i '" (\ :'( :> III '" '" <( o <>! u: ~ ~ 8.....6; ~ -- lQ u'~::: ~ G 2 @;;;m",!Ii ~ ~ ~~!~3 ~ '" ;::~ ;:;:"1:~~~~...~~!:;~ltl'" nhffig~hd!~i ",,",,-<I<(!ii~~uuuuCl~'" I ~ ~ o ~ ;;;: <>!g o ~ ~~ ~" ~m~ .'3~l:l~:1l o:!,:lI::l:l: w ~Il ~ 5~ u .-~ ~ u u . '<oj ~MQo~" ~ow ~ ""5~w~ ",,,,>:ea.... 0' ~~ ~~ x .....~~ 8..,ro ~o~ lQu....~~ >"'ox lQ ~~l:a.~"",,,,,",,GOz ....,,~l:~Ow~~a."'""~~ ",,",,",,",,"'lOWUUUU ~wwwww~~"""1:LL' )nQ", 2:~~ ~ f I . . x ~ "' E /j ./' i~ "t,-... ~ r_J ~~ <--- "t__ __~".... Zw r ~'-_"__"__~_' <. ~.... ~.... ...... ...::1 ~ ~ i\"J1&l ~~I&l ~~~ 2~~ ~~~~ o~o ".~ ~"'U .", ~ I&l~ ;t~... 3~~~'; ,!~~ ~<~ .wz~ . '~'w 0' 2r,~~ ~~~~ ~!g "", .~ ~"'QZ - 3 ~Ii~~ ~ ~ ~~~; a18&!~ " ! ffi " 3 o , " ~ J Cilli..... ~<(l:J 1L~:t; ~ 5. jg~ ~~ wo 00 @~ ~" ~:lj B ~~ ~~. ::r~z<( ~~~~ ;' - [)( ~~~~lhg~~~S:3~"a! . o :..~ !is... ~~~ iliu 1If~~":' ~t:ou t~~~ <~~o 61 i::J z _. 00-0 Q) ","''<: ~ '- (/)- .- c- o ",0 :;::::0>; ~E::J t;:,- '00>.2:-- Q) -0 ::J CD Q.c"O.c m::l _ ~ '- ro: '- cO '" to",E"O a.EtOs .~ >.- '- .c..c_Q) - to", m~-S.5 rn :5 [-0 gOI ~Q) 5LL1 ~ .- ...~... c t:: 0. (ij C . Q) en l: C'- Q) "to.Q O~ E >. :: .~ '00 -0 to .c_>(/) Z '" ~ Olio... Q) (])_ ... 0 -- c Ol 0.0.0 to.- .r::. CD::J"'-'" _...enQ.(f}Q. 'FF'I L/L/ ,I<' ,,,, ,,,, II,. ,,,, J-,j'~{'~~~'"}-\<' o~!::~ '~.,.,-, ::;0 :r;a ... \.,._ w;;: x~ ~~~ ,) <II wI ~:OQ \~J ~~~ '\~> 2~~ \, ~~~8 '} Xu \>--eW ~~" J: ::; r x3 :g " 0<3 '/" . Uz ') ...... ;" . 'j ~~ -.< 3.~ ~~w ~u~ C\J ~ o C'l a; - to o " z <(. --J~ o...~ W~ f-~ to '" g I: >- '" z 2~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :t; !!l @<Il<ElII~I~I~~ L-]~ 0 z o ;, ~ . o 2 ~ c . ~ ...!Z ~ [~5g ., < ~2~~ ;::<(~----' <fILmW xa<(~ wuu<fI z o ~ ~u ~~ ~~ ~ffi -'w .J-, lIlu:: lilt:' H !is ~ ~jg fj ~~ ~ :; ~ ~ I I r 1 I 1 !1 , , , , , ~ , ~ ~ ~ llI: . !~ ill " ^ >. ~. w Q .h~ . ~:R ~~ ~~ ul , ,1 , , 3 '" iil",~~ * i :i2 !< 0 . xf I, " ,,",...>:: g~~~ ~~ b ~ Wf- " .... .. ov.s , I ~ . f- " 2.0 ~ N !: "'"~. -'0;- ",3~~ , ~~ :1 oj f-<l , '<J ~":: ~ ~~'i~ g . f ,~ llI: > II .- ;~ ::!;/)>:: U b ~i ill !... "~ ;::>::0 "'"~ , " ~~ . W . 0.. ;...wu ii". ~ ~ffi !i ~ 'q' f- o~ -' ;ji4 [II I~ i ! ! i l! l! <l . W Vl I 3 , < " ~ 8 . . ffi ~ i. ~~~ ~ 'of . flfll'l ... ).oil).o ~ t:1l1l 0 ~ 0 ~ i~~g~ ~~~i: ~h.~~ uO.nu2.n 1:~~~~~ lo~2.~ 3~~:li!D ~....X<l;~..... e~~i:t~ ~ " " '1:::i <t m. ~ (j ~ Q ~ 5 t- z ~ ~ ~ ~ E ~ li ~ I.'l I.'ll.'l;: z z z '" ~ ~ ~ ~ I n ~ i ,-- ~ Q . " " , ~ ~ ~ :r:o Q ~~ "'i~1I 2~w~~~ U6~3~D lIh: .....w ,,1,lJ~il8g:: zll!:z :;;.q (1Il;::;: Ci:n .no~";~~ll! ~~0~.:8 ;::.q"'lix~y ~~~IL~fli "''''if.ll'Iz ah~~~lii8 o -. .!" ~lIlB ....0<:' ~..~ i5~o QIt91 ~~~.q >~>.~ !!! 31!! ~ IL~ - $ . ill o o . < z ~ . ~ ~ ~ x - ! . ~ 98 ~2 I~ .~ .0 -. ~~ 0' ~i 00 ~~ ~ o ~~ ji> ,~ .. w~ ~o 0, ~D S~ .. ~i 3> -. ~, . o J i~" -,. ~.8 .qD~ ~~. UJ:"; :;~~ .-> LtDM .0. ~>. ~er -~. X . - . ~~~ . . ~ Z. ~~ ~~O :n;t~ X~::: -0' ~o. O'~ >~. ._0 ODQ ii2 gO" O~~ w'- as.... cO Ql ..!!lQlE-o o.E<llC '" ::J .- >-,-.... ..coO _ .... - <llW _"U.c:<D ro<D_C .r::..... -- - ctS"U g I ~~fijW ~ -0. _C '- C (lj c' l1> VJ 0 c'- <D o<ll'-o~E .5"~-f:2-Ui- (Ij Q)_C:ooOZ ....OQ).g!Q)- ~ a.a.oca.5 -Q)::::J'-_'- _....000..0011. 0_ ~~ " ~; ~I D. .. 0" ~~I 0,- O~. ~<I~ .0. < ~ ~ . 3 ~ " . X - --t----::: = ::;1 :'m . . ~ ~ ~ " ~ . :; l la :iB2 _.~ ~~~ ~ol!! am. L , 2! ::J iij oC >0) .ll!._ o-en * Wzil --. DiU oS" ....~:! .n3~ '-0 p'o t03 ijl~~ _00 ">- Dll!!;i 328 ~~~ ~ijH _o~ Qj .E ~8 ....~:3~ :3Sil~ ila~~ ~~"O ....."",.q,.. ~~~i ODUw o~U ~~:n... Bw~~ "--> ~Q::::U ~~.m X~IU.q ~U1~~ :!Ir:UU ~ 0> -, ~_. ;::3:.1!! ~a~ --. l_~ f-!z ~ ~~~g oj):::I<II-<( ~:2:u~ ;:.q:;'::..J '"I:aJW x(l'1:~ wUU<fI "l"<;I\f ;"c2l-,GIl'a . 'O\fNN31NV' \two:::> '0:-"'01:::>3'0 lNI.....S ':JNll'OIX3,!O 10 "l'<;I'O' '_"'-.=1 " S'O'NN31N'O' 'O'WO:::> ~-"'01:::>3S lNI~d'O 9N11SIX3 ~O " "i","V I.(Z'-.to!il . 9VNN31NV !Nl~ VWCl::l m3N :10 'l> "l"'7\'" ;"c2l-,,,"'51 'SI1NN31N'\l'N3CJ! lNI...d'O ':JN11SIX3:JO" z Q f- <l ).<Ij wi ..Jw w< :r~ f- ::J o ill w Q ~ ~ r\ ~ 2!!l ~h '" ~~ ,~ '. _'~ r:: ~~ ..... " " " 0,,""", C ~O- ~;j "" .~ o.>._[J] ~~ = ""': I- ;::i::O 0.. ~~U 'w V1 ~ ~~ 'i ij >:i: ij " , . iL R Q i i ; iii ~ i2 f! ~ qP oid ~ 3~ ~~ L--- mg: ;!? ~ ;~ ~g~ . ~ < ~~ tS.. ~, ~.~. lllz [~~~ ~~ cijl~~ ~~ l___--~- L____-- " . . o z . , ~ , . X L_- ~. 0.. ~~~ ~Q~' ....w!f:t iii;;i-< :n:t~1Il ;3~~ ~ao 1.. '. ~. ~::~.... O:fa~~~ t.~~~ .~m Z</)J:::IW -1 ~ ~ ". ~! s ~j t ~ ~3 ~~ 0 i ~ ~ g~~ ~ i"~ ij" -' _U B! ~ ~u a~ ....~z ~~ .t~<t ~< "< ~~ <" ";to:o 3 "~< ~y ~ ~a~ "~ t~:ii2 3~ -- I w ~ ~ffi . , . '0 ~ t'l '0 X< > u r ' < " . X w o j 2 ~~ ~ ~ffi~ <I):~ ZIIl ~i~ 6~~ E!ii ~!'t~ ~iVl (jij ~~" ~o" ~~ t<i~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~~ j~~ ~t~ ~~B .q:x;:: wUz J:.... w....u ll!:d112 u~o Jj o&!i ~::i~ :3on~ i!' ~~~ m~ ~o~ () ~ "~u ~.~p~~~ z ~~! ..~~~ ~~>~ -J :5~ ~~~~ ~W~!i <{ ow.... oli:z;a cl)WW 111 ~5~w "~~" .~~g ~ J: ll!lf ~lIlli~ :~~u w ... ~:::: ~...:&! "'....:n,~ ~ :t u~~ ~2~lL i!~t '\ _._~-~----,--_.._._--~- .-,--..-.--.....-..- .. ~ '" - ~ Qj Ol OJ jnO r---C~-H ; ~ ~ ,-JJ ~~ . " ~ ~~" m ~~\!; Z "':It lL a ~ .. ~ I- <I lI' I- UJ Z UJ IL UJ -' III <I II I~ . ~ ,. ;,;! .' QD& o:n... ")'. ~<l~ ':"..,u nm[ , ati Of) D ;I1i g .JIIIQ~ g ,,~~~oB a i~~~~ 0 ~"~8 " I~ 3 ~Q ~ : 9ii1Q 0 i5i!ZIll~ ~ 011 ~i! I ~ cr: I-\!!!:I iii! :!~o <J ,<g~ "eO 2.~<~' ~~~ ~ :z= I:&1l ~11l:t ll!:~!!.I:lll 0 ~o~~ ~u ~ i::ii ii!..., l!!~~~~ ~ llif"Q ~ w:ll ...IlIlw~ ~~9 ;!;~Ill: iiJ ::l!!~iil :l OQ ;:;I.Ju ~ lIIoSlllf 3 <(11I..::1 ~ ~.q i;t~~ ~ILM i!%~:::Cl III. "~OO . a Q:zz "wll) \1.- <II- Ii WI!! z cr:~ w",::lD. z~g 0: w~ l5 '" jj;!!. 9 ~~ ;~~i ~~" ~s~h ~ M~ ~ ,~ ~~~r ij.1 *~ffi. .~~, ! ~~ ~z~~o w.Q~\I- ifQ~U~ i :l:g;;:i ! .....u ....wi:) ....II,) WciOl....lW: ~cr::t i ~~ ,~H :J:~ ~;jffi~~~. ~~i~ ~ ~~ Q~.q: i-w U3u..~... ~ :Ih:l: .~g~~ ~ .....iil~~:;:I:~ 2~~~~:~h ~2.....<l<tlllua:~ ~~~h!li-'() aQi!ll;hcr:cl.. -,.q!i~....j"'~~ ~~.~~.~H ~9~.~l'i. 1L~-...J~o..q8!1! &\:i~51~w;u6 ....I~....;o:... l!!.....)j: ~,~.~ ~~. ia~~i~cr:i; ~2~!l~~r~S i~m;~i~ "..."oE'"~. ....~ '." ~...~..u ;'0' ,; <I . cP-Il ~:g <l) ill'" ill ~~ -' <il~ w- "' ll~ o .. 1-<1 , D 0...1 : f:i - l- II X' <l)w "Z ~ ~~ 0 <oL .~ L < < ~ w ~ 3 w . J~ ~~ w~ ...~ ~'" ;;' ~ , tonM ~~~ .0. ~~~ d~~ 'h ~. ~w 3~ ~~ ~" ~~ ~ w !il:::~ Mit --" w"B " U~ ~ I- Z ~;. :::J 3"~ a ~:B[ L au -' , au lI' ,-- a , I- 0 II ~ 0 UJ . <l) . ~ <ll W I- a z FR90-13.XXXBL2 DualPol@ Polarization 806 MHz - 941 MHz Electrical Specifications Azimuth Beamwidth Elevation Beamwidth Elevation Sidelobes (U pper) Gain Polarization Port-to-Port Isolation Front-to-Back Ratio Electrical Downtilt Options VSWR Connectors Power Handling Passive Intermodulation Lightning Protection goo 9S ;, 18 dB 12.8 dBd (14.9 dBi) Dual Linear, Slant (:!: 450) ;, 20 dB ;, 28 dB 00,50 1.35:1 Max 2; Type N or 7-16 DIN (female) 500 Watts CW ,; -150 dBc [2 x 20W (+ 43 dBm)] Chassis Ground Mechanical Specifications Dimensions (L x W x D) 96 in x 12 in x 7 in (243.8 cm x 30.5 cm x 17.8 cm) 130 mph (209 kph) 8ft'(.74 m') 2361bs (1050 N) 1371bs (610 N) 33.51bs (15.3 kg) Rated Wind Velocity Equivalent Flat Plate Area Front Wind Load @ 100 mph (161 kph) Side Wind Load @ 100 mph (161 kph) Weight (Without Mounting Kit) Mounting Options MTG-POO-30, MTG-S02-30, MTG-DXX-30', MTG-CXX-30', MTG-C02-30, MTG-TXX-30' OptiFiWM Suppressor™ Note: 'Model number shown represents a series of products. See Mounting Options section for specific model number. Patterns 270' O' "'. ". Azimuth Elevation 50 Downtilt Elevation 00 Downtilt Revised 09/13/04 EMS' antennas are protected by one or more of the following U.S. patents: 5,844,529; 6,067,053; 6,462,710; 6,392,600; 6,069,590; 5,966,102; 5,757,246. EMS' antenna designs may also be covered by pending U.S. patent applications and by pending & awarded international patents. +1770.582.0555 ex!. 5310' Fax +1770.729.0036 www.emswireless.com Features . Remote Control for Horizontal Beam Steering and - OneStap Ahead for _rand Easi'l'llplimi2llllon; No Need fur - Preclsll Patlllm Comrol . . Compact Size and Ugllt Welght . Lower Wirnlload with Cylindrical Shape Radome . Zoning Ffiendly . Capacily Increase - Traffic load Balan", by Horlzonlallll!am StooIil1lJ - Minlmlre Cll-Co'nnelllllertllreool b~ Adi"slabl~ v..1l:aI DllWil- . Minimum Optimization Burden -Optimlla1ion reqUlllJSAdjusling Oownllll.nd_ Diredloo . Predictable Ceil Planning - Malntalnlng Sam. Beam _m Shape when 5leerlld and . Increase Average RevenDe Per User (ARPU) . Rapid Return On Inveslment (ROI) . Direct Remote Control Option . No Additional Device in between a Controiler and an - Blvlroomant FrUlrnl~ AJlllroaclJ - Blhan"d Reialliby bOcause of no !\ewe Componel1iS In 111. . CllslEff,ctiva.sollJ1ion . On-site Remote Control with PorlalJle Controller (at . Central Remote Control with Main Controller (at O&M Center or other Remote Central Location) A1SG Compatible Option . Enhancing Commonalily - AI5G ComjlaJ~~ RET . On-site Remote Control wllh Portable Controller (at . Central Remote Control with Main Controller (atO&M Center or other Remote Centrallocalion) ..-.-.. :', :' ':,' -: - - - "", ',",:,', ,,," ': ':',F"m;j,St{I'I'\-::::<t<' , HUlRIDi!~WAY Jm.J1..I!iTABLE ~I\II'\,IA;,' " . ,':<::'::' rrt.r1f1ltl" ,:":-::;" ~" ')~ ~ ~~,'~ j ~ ~ ~ ~, 1 "j xj~ -~" ~:!;)j "'~_-: 1-' "':,,:j:"-~: Dellveringlnnovatlve, Rellable, and Cost-Effective Antenna SolutiollS Specifications 65' 7" "'lA:l (;"15.6dB) Ir -16' W' lBdB ;"25 dB Dual. Slant ,"45' 21BdB ;;,(jOdB 1M3: -150 dEo (under all downUIls) 350 Walts Silohms 7116 DIN female <1>5.14 x51.Mlnches (q,1SSx 1319 mm) kg) KMWlnc. 65YoongC~\lm-Rl, 'OongTan-Myun Hwi.1SU\'l~~}'Do 445-810 Rcpoubl!c Of Koroa TeI:+Sz..:31.3ro;OO74 f<lll~""82,,31.,;37~ E-rr.alI: lrtfo@kjnwinc.com KMWccmrn,urileatians,lne. rn:1.Q<aredn~BNtf. &lllill K.l.MGatdon GI'OYcCA 92841. U.SA TeI:.,+i~11A;,ij~ .Fax:.f1~1t~ &mwl ;fI1fu@~inrn.cOm KMWJ.piu!,Jnl; 222-OC133~rrolmlrouBI~,t3;7F1 S1nybktlhaitla~1.&'s'i<OuhOktW<u, Yokohal'l'l&<Si, Kanagawa.,l<.r:m iliIpi1tl Tel:1:~1;4S,4-18-22rg Fa1::+61,.4!M~J~ E-mall :..twmI@kmWIoo.C(lJp KMWChm1I,fm:. 2ndFl~,iBrdg.au:; 3$1 JftlZ'.;ll'lgR JlfulIOOExpl;)rtProce&$lrtQZ1:3\1l ~l'IM~'201206;PRC r~1~...eG-21~a145 FIDt~_+a6-2t.68S~!3 &maii "$hhan@kfflwclJ.imj, - .1511'f (..,we - .70,\;) (217.3kph) 222 (O.21m') 44.5lbl (197.5 N) From 1.6 to 4.3 Inches (40 to 110 mm) 00 ma,ts and tlatsurfacas Remote Mechanical Steering & Electrical Oowntilt . Horizontal beam steering without degrading radiation pattern shape by simple mechanical rotation mechanism Copyright 2005 J(MW.Inc. All rlgl1to re'erved. The inrormallM herein Is sUbje,t to cllangewJthoul noli'.. J(MW reserveS me tights to, deslgn orcomponants as engfneerlngand matlufJlcturing raqulrtlmillrtsoemand. bltp:!/WWW.kmwinc.com Attachment 3A- 2 ~ ~HILLS City Engineer and Building Official Review October 3, 2007, Planning Commission Meeting ~_;.J , Greg Hoag From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Deb Bloom Wednesday, May 23, 2007 2: 11 PM Greg Hoag Terrence Heiser FW: Arden Hills Tower Terre and I reviewed the plans and came up with the following list of things to look for on this lease agreement/ approval of plans: 1. There are 4 existing CDMA antennas and supports to be removed. All holes/ scratches/ damage to the tower caused by the supports from these antennas should be repaired, and the tower should be painted with primer and matching paint to ensure that the metal is protected. 2. A building permit should be issued for the proposed antennas. Check with your building officials to see what they would require. It may be necessary for structural engineer to review the plans to ensure that the proposed antenna supports meet code. 3. The language in the existing lease agreement should be reviewed to ensure that it refers to securing the cables. They also should not impede the use of the access tube by City or other Antenna users. The engineering diagram indicates that the cables will be affixed to the existing cable rack. 4. The lease agreement should deal with RF interference. Since CDMA is a licensed frequency, it would not interfere with any other frequency since mobile phone operators all use different, noninteferring frequencies. Arden Hills would need to have an RF engineer report if any operator requesting use of the tower is using any of the unlicensed frequencies (like Wi-Fi) . 5. Lease agreement should be reviewed. Usually the higher the antennas the higher the cost. If it's going on the top. ..it's top dollar. We are getting $22,000 for 75' on the Fairview tower legs. 6. It is suggested that Sprint cover the access holes with a removable steel screen cover or cap to be secured to prevent falling from the tower. It should not be necessary to fill the holes as these are welded steel collars, not just a hole. The access holes can used by a future lessee. If these are welded shut, any future operator (perhaps even Arden Hills) would need to cut new holes into the tower. The key document would be the lease, and not so much the engineering document as it is pretty standard for a tower like this. Let us know if you have any questions. -----Original Message----- From: Greg Hoag Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 3:44 PM To: Deb Bloom Subject: FW: Arden Hills Tower Deb- Here it is. Greg Hoag Public Works Director City of Arden Hills (651)792-7847 Direct (651)634-5137 Fax greg.hoag@ci.arden-hills.mn.us -----Original Message----- From: Richard Markus [mailto:rmarkus@barantelecom.com] Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 11:01 PM To: Greg Hoag (Arden Hills) Subject: RE: Arden Hills Tower 1 ~ Attached are preliminary drawings for your review and comment. . -----Original Message----- From: Greg Hoag (Arden Hills) [mailto:greg.hoag@ci.arden-hills.mn.us] Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 12:08 PM To: rmarkus@barantelecom.com Subject: Arden Hills Tower Richard- Here is what I was able to find, hope it helps. Greg Hoag Public Works Director City of Arden Hills (651)792-7847 Direct (651)634-5137 Fax greg.hoag@ci.arden-hills.mn.us 2 Attachment 3A - 3 Air Photo and Photographs of the Site ~ ~H1LLS October 3, 2007, Planning Commission Meeting 'W , ~ ~ j III ..... ,'l!!:~"~?9. ~€1il~ !<"~~ .....2 ,1: .. ll'l-OU'l. 'iij...:Iii....ci!2f'l:.g:8 ~..~ .8:::9a~: d"'sB ''Wi.iil.ll :;;;<~52 .2.Xf1;l".5.~.g .!?'b ~..f}. a.s~'&3: <Il.6.;""l:I: </j " ~ '0 :;; " " E " C " . " o -0 o " o <8 '~.i-~ E g~ ~ ~~ ._" o~ -E ~ <i 8 ~~ !;g;; 01:::;:: 8~~ .~ ::;'00 :=<S~ 8'"8] 0" . 00_ <"I u.::l .;:l-; ~ g.-;; E a:;; ~ :E~~ E-<.,:"<8 <li5:;r- Coo 0...0:::0 ""N " 0 ]~~ :::] ~" "~~ -; ~~ ......- '" "'0"8"8 " . 0 ~ ~o ~ e ~ ~ " .~ @'g 00 .00 .::: : .... ~o~ g~ a ~]8 ~ : iQ " 0 ~S~ 8.-:: g ",.u E.g,8 "'O<Br- -2]8 OON gEe" ".~ 2'>t:i..... -a~~ ~:::.. -;55 " 0 " .B.~~ .~ ~ g .~ 2: ~ g.'~j a . " :E~F: ~~r::: ~]g ;;SsN.. - 00 <:~~ .., " u -; ~ - i5 i:l< ~ ~ = o ... ..... ~ OJ o ~ I ..... = '" S '0 = '" S < ~ ~ U ..... = ... lo.. i:l< 00. " g u " j OJ '" ii ;0 o ~ ~ ::I '''' '*l 8 :;ij '" "'" .;,... ~ ~ ~ B ~j~!t ~hil !/i ~i! ~ H h 8 t! c<iS:;.ljg'.flcC':;:l/lO;;N, ~;~B.sllla: 0. eo::! ~ <l.l ..- .... fFj I ..- := <l.l e '0 := <l.l e ~ ~ ~ U ..- := .... .. 0. fFj " o ~ '0 :;: o " .s .. ." o " " o '" -0 :; ::: a ,z ~~~ 68~ ~~:a '-AO< ~ ~;':f C3 p,~ 00", ~i:jo; 'Ci e'~ ;:::<80; 00", ~~'@ S']] 0" " U;:l'"@ :..8'8 .- 0 <I) ~: E a:;; g ~1a::: ~ 6<8 .u~r-- 000 oiJ;:; ~ " ]~~ ~JL:f <ll....'d ~ ~'" .8.8~ ]]2; ] rf~ EiS ..: e 0,) g g e .;:l : ]]"2 <'30..:': >>", 0 ~ a ~ 0" " 0 ~tE ;::: go g c.:oau <'3 l:i .... E"O<2 'O<8t- 0",0 ] a~" ~~~ >>~ ::;a.6~ ~l'lH -;88 i3;:.:;o :€'G S ~ :g :fi .~ 0 3: g;aj ~.~~ ~]~ ~2S ~.s~ ~~d <:"'~ ~ u '" " Ui '" i;l ::> o ~ Looking South East From Red Fox Road Looking West From Target Parking Lot Looking South West from Red Fox Road Looking East from Hamline Avenue MEMORANDUM DATE: October 3, 2007 PC Agenda Item 3.B TO: Planning Commission FROM: Meagan Beekman, Planner I ~/-- James Lehnhoff, City Planny SUBJECT: Planning Case #: 07-028 Mounds View Public Schools 1900 Lake Valentine Road and 1770 County Road E2 Site Plan Review ATTACHMENTS: 3B-I Application and Supporting Documents 3B-2 Maps and Photographs Requested Action The applicants have requested a site plan review to install banners on light posts at both Mounds View High School and Valentine Hills Elementary. Back!!round 1. Overview of Request: The applicants propose to install several banner sigus at each of the schools within the Mounds View Public School District. Two of these schools, Valentine Elementary located at 1770 County Road E2 and Mounds View High School located at 1900 Lake Valentine Road, are located within the City of Arden Hills and are subject to site plan review. If the plan is approved nine new banner sigus would be installed on light posts that line the circle drive entrance of Mounds View High School. These banners would be visible from Lake Valentine Road. In addition, ten new banner sigus would be installed on light posts at Valentine Hills Elementary; four along the sidewalk nearest the front door and six in the parking lot. The banner sigus would be made of vinyl, double-sided, and measure eight square feet (two feet by four feet). There would be one sigu per light post. The applicants have submitted a letter City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor October 3, 2007 \\Metro-inet.us\ardenhills\PlanninglPlanning Cases\2007\07~028 Mounds View Site Plan Review\l00307 - PC report - Mounds View Site Plan Review.doc Page 1 of 6 fully explaining their request along with pictures of the proposed banners as well as site plans indicating where they will be placed on each site (Attachment 3B-I). The sign code does not specifically address non-commercial banner signs on school property such as is proposed by the applicant. However, Section (number is from an old version of the sign code--need to get you an updated copy) of the sign code allows for sign standard adjustments through the site plan review process, provided that specific criteria can be met. If this site plan is approved a sign permit will be required for each school. 2. Surrounding Area: Mounds View Hi h School: North Low Density Residential R-I: Single Family Residential Light Industrial school bus arkin area South Low Density Residential R-l: Single Family Residential Single Family Residential East Low Density Residential R-l: Single Family Residential Single Family Residential West Water and Park R-I: Single Family Residential Water and Passive Open Space Valentine Hills Elementary North Park R-l: Single Family Residential Passive Open Space South Park R-I: Single Family Residential Passive Open Space East Park R-I: Single Family Residential Passive Open Space West Low Density Residential R-I: Single Family Residential Single Family Residential 3. Site Data: Mounds View Hi h School Public and Institutional Institutional R-l: Single Family Residential 56.34 Acres (245,4170.4 sq. ft.) The site is generally flat, but drops off sharply along the western portion of the lot. The grade rises sli htlyon the east and southeast ortions of the lot. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor October 3, 2007 \\Metro-inet.uslardenhills\Planning\Planning Cases\2007\07-028 Mounds View Site Plan Review\100307 - PC report ~ Mounds View Site Plan Review.doc Page 2 of 6 Public and Institutional Institutional R-I: Single Family Residential 10.63 Acres (463,042.8 sq. ft.) The site is generally flat but slopes slightly down towards the street to the north and upwards towards the homes to the west. Plan Evaluation: Ordinances 1. Sign District 2 - Section 1240: Table 1 Both schools are in Sign District 2, as non-residential uses in the R-l through R-4 zoning districts. In this sign district freestanding signs are permitted; however, banner signs of this nature are not specifically regulated. 2. Site Plan Review - Section 1260.01: Sign Standard Adjustments Section lofthe Sign Code permits adjustments to sign height, number, type, lighting, area, and/or location through the site plan review process if criteria number one or two is met and the required criteria number three is met: 1. There are site conditions which require a sign adjustment to allow the sign to be reasonably visible from a street immediately adjacent to the site; or, 2. The sign adjustment will allow a sign of exceptional design or a style that will enhance the area or that is more consistent with the architecture and design of the site; and, 3. The sign adjustment will not result in a sign that is inconsistent with the purpose of the zoning district in which the property is located or the current land use. 3. Purpose of Sign Code -Purpose and Intent The purpose of the City's Sign Code may help in determining if this site plan reflects the intent of the Site Standards Adjustment process. . Subd. 1 Regulate the number, location, size, type, illumination, and other physical characteristics of signs within the City in order to promote the public health safety, and welfare; . Subd. 2 Allow effective signage appropriate to the planned character of each sign district; . Subd. 3 Promote an attractive environment while providing for effective means of communication consistent with constitutional guarantees and the City's goals of public safety and aesthetics; . Subd. 4 Minimize adverse effects on nearby property; and, City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor October 3,2007 \\Metro-inet.uslardenhills\PlanninglPlanning Cases\2007\07-028 Mounds View Site Plan Review\l00307 - PC report -Mounds View Site Plan Review.doc Page 3 of6 . Subd. 5 Provide for fair and consistent enforcement ofthe sign regulations set forth herein under the zoning authority ofthe City. Findin!!s of Fact The Plarming Commission must make a finding as to whether or not the proposed site plan for banner signs at Mounds View High School and Valentine Hills Elementary meets the criteria outlines in the Sign Standard Adjustments code and if the signs would adversely affect the surrounding neighborhood and the community as a whole. Staff offers the following nine findings for consideration: 1. Signs are a permitted use in Sign District 2. 2. The proposed signs are a reasonable use on school property. 3. There are no conditions unique to this site that would require a sign adjustment to allow the sign to be reasonably visible from a street immediately adjacent to the site. 4. The purpose ofthe signage is not to be visible from public streets, but rather to promote branding and visibility within the sites. 5. The signage plan for the schools is a district wide plan designed to provide consistency throughout the district and is consistent with the design and architecture of the sites. 6. The proposed signs enhance the overall visual impact of the sites. 7. The proposed signs are not inconsistent with the purpose of the R -1 zoning district or the current land use. 8. The proposed signs are not anticipated to have any adverse effects on neighboring properties. 9. Resident Comments Staff has not received any letters, e-mails, or telephone calls from property owners or occupants in regard to this planning case. However, site plan reviews are not public hearings and do not require public notice. Staff Recommendation To approve this application, the Planning Commission and City Council must specifically address Section 1200.22 Subd 2: The sign adjustment will allow a sign of exceptional design or a style that will enhance the area or that is more consistent with the architecture and design of the site. This is not a variance application, and the applicant does not need to demonstrate "undue hardship" for the City to approve this application. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor October 3, 2007 \\Metro-inet.uslardenhills\Planning\Planning Cases\2007\07-028 Mounds View Site Plan ReviewlI00307 - PC report - Mounds View Site Plan Review.doc Page 4 of 6 As noted in the findings of fact, Staff believes that this site plan for banner signs at each ofthe Mounds View Public School located within Arden Hills enhances the character of the properties and the surrounding neighborhoods. The plans are consistent with surrounding schools' site plans for signage and promote a consistent branding of the sites. Therefore, based on the submitted plans and the nine findings of fact, Staff recommends approval of Planning Case #07- 028 subject to the following four conditions: I. The project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council. 2. The applicant will obtain a sign permit for each site prior to installation of any signs. 3. Except for the existing lighting posts, the banners shall not have new lighting directed at them. 4. If a banner becomes damaged, it shall be promptly removed or replaced. Options & Proposed Motion Lan!!ua!!e 1. Recommend Approval with Conditions: Motion to recommend avvroval of Planning Case 07-028 for a Site Plan Review at 1770 County Road E2 and 1900 Lake Valentine Road based on the findings of fact, the submitted plans, and the four conditions in the October 3, 2007, planning case memo. 2. Recommend Approval as Submitted: Motion to recommend avvroval of Planning Case 07- 028 for a Site Plan Review at 1770 County Road E2 and 1900 Lake Valentine Road based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans in the October 3, 2007, planning case memo. 3. Recommend Denial: Motion to recommend denial of Planning Case 07-028 for a Site Plan Review at 1770 County Road E2 and 1900 Lake Valentine Road based on the following findings: findings to deny should specifically reference the reasons for denial and why those reasons cannot be mitigated. 4. Table: Motion to table Planning Case 07-028 for a Site Plan Review at 1770 County Road E2 and 1900 Lake Valentine Road: a specific reason and information request should be included with a motion to table. Deadline for A!!encv Actions The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on September 10, 2007, 2007. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes, the City must act on this request by November 9,2007 (60 days), unless the city provides the petitioner with written reasons for and additional City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor October 3,2007 \\Metro-inet.uslardenhillslPlanninglPlanning Cases\2007\07-028 Mounds View Site Plan Review\100307 - PC report - Mounds View Site Plan Review.doc Page 5 of6 60 day review period. The City may, with the consent of the applicant, extend the review period beyond the initial 120 days. Attachments 3B-I 3B-2 Application and Supporting Documents Maps and Photographs City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor October 3, 2007 \\Metro-inet.uslardenhillsIPlanning\Planning Cases\2007\07-028 Mounds View Site Plan Review\100307 - PC report - Mounds View Site Plan Review.doc Page 6 of6 Attachment 3B-l ~ ~HrLLS Application and Supporting Documents October 3, 2007, Planning Commission Meeting ~ Mounds View ~ PUBLIC SCHOOLS MEMO TO: FROM: DATE: RE: James Lehnhoff, Arden Hills City Planner -/.. Colin Sokolowski, Public Relations Director {,AJ'"C September 10, 2007 Land Use Permit Application Mounds View Public Schools is installing banners on lightposts at all schools throughout the District. Two ofthose sites reside in Arden Hills - Mounds View High School and Valentine Hills Elementary Schools. To achieve visual consistency from site to site, we hope Arden Hills will grant this request. xrY We plan to install nine vinyl banners at Mounds View and ~ at Valentine Hills. See attached art. At Mounds View, these would be installed on iightposts that line our circle drive entrance. At Valentine Hills three would be installed on lightposts that line the sidewalk nearest the front door and six would affix to parking lot lightposts. These are permanent and would be lit by the lightposts on which they're attached. At Mounds View the banners would be visible from Lake Valentine Road. At Valentine Hills the parking lot banners "might" be visible from County Road E2. The banners will visually enhance the entrances to these schools and keep these sites consistent with the appearance of our other nine schools in the District. The banners are consistent with the zonmg. Thank you for your consideration. ~ ~HILLS 1245 West Highway 96 Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112 Telephone (651) 792-7800 Fax (651) 634-5137 www.ci.arden-hills.mn.us For Office Use Only Plannin9 Case No. Submittal Date Application Compieted Date Accepted by Receipt Number Council Decision Council Decision Date 2007 LAND USE APPLICATION Applicant Information Applicant: (lI/ov'1d s V; CW P \.I b [i L 5 c.L, ods Address: c> HI ~\,.rO-' 1Ja wes+ St-o/-eV\o(\'" I N)).' 1- 0:>"1- boll.! Other: Fax No.: b5! -039 -" 'JoLJ EmailAddress: Col;..,. 5 "kolo\.vl>k; .;v fi'lO\'/~Svii?<V$c.~ctlIS. of:':) Propertv Information Property Owner: D i) ir, c__1 (, ;l. J Owner Address: ;, C t' 'i \;>0 \,/c 5))=<(; I Other: Owner Telephone No. Address of Pro ert Involved: , , ,t ;'1liJ -Nt- e"tc.t, Slip -JrOi" R<t~!''t'Y {w'1fJ Le9al Description: See q "i(!'("d Property ID No.: Type of Use: Zone: I Property Acreage: Type of ReQuest* o Apportionment of Assessments ($30) o Comprehensive Plan Amendment ($400) o Conditional Use Permit or Amended CUP ($300) o Final Plat ($200 + $25 per lot) o Final Planned Unit Development ($200) o Master Planned Unit Development ($600 + escrow) o Minor Subdivision (lot spliUconsolidation) ($300) o Preliminary Piat ($400 + $25 per lot + escrow) o Rezoning ($400) g ~e Plan Review ($400) ~Site Plan Review (Sign or Fence) ($250) o Vacation of Easement or Right-of-Way ($250 + escrow) o Variance (Zoning Code) ($300) o Zoning Code Amendment ($300 + escrow) Revised: 01-30-07 Page 1 of3 'Applicants are responsible for reimbursement of consultant fees associated with filing, reviewing, and processing of this application. Such fees are to be paid in escrow up front or upon receipt of statement from the City of Arden Hills. Fees include costs for consultants retained by the City and include consultant planning services, attorney, and engineer. 'Payment of park dedication fees are required with the approval of most subdivision applications. 'The land use application fees do not cover building, si9n, or other permit fees that may be required upon approval of a land use application. 'Certain applications are subject to review and approval by the Rice Creek Watershed District. Contact RCWD directly at 763-398- 3070 for additional information. Brief Description of Request (please also include a tvped, detailed letter explaininq the project): fvH\...~ 5d,\)\)\ bq",l"r<;. 6..., )\'j",1-9~~i s q.J. VOlh'd\~'" Hi\),S ,Er-f'1'I f'-t7,ry $"c..'.tlcl\ q",J ;\"."v,,~ S v(~ 11\')1, ~c.,odl FilinQ & Information Requirements The City requests that you make a pre-application meetin9 with the City Planner to discuss the application process, requirements, and deadlines. Unless waived by the City Planner or Planning Commission, a certified survey of the property is required for all applications. The Planning Commission andlor City Council may still require a certified survey. A checklist for other required information is also available. Complete/Incomplete Applications An incomplete application will delay the processing of land use requests. The application approval time commences and an application is considered officially filed when the City Planner has received and examined the application and determined that the application is complete. A decision on whether the application is complete or incomplete shall be made within fifteen (15) working days following the submittal of the application. When the application is deemed to be "complete" it shall be placed on the agenda of the first possible Planning Commission meeting provided that all required public notices have been sent and published. Payment of Fees The undersigned acknowledges that shelhe understands that before a land use application can be deemed complete. all required information and fees (including all deposits) must be paid to the City. If additional fees are required to cover costs incurred by the City, the City Planner has the ri9ht to require additional payment from one or more of the undersi9ned, who shall be jointly liable for such fees. Such expenses may include (but are not limited to) direct city payroll and overhead costs, fees paid to consultants and other professionals, and the cost of printing, mailing, and supplies. The City may withhold final action on a land use application, withhold building permits, andlor rescind prior action until all miscellaneous fees have been paid. Applicants are advised that an escrow deposit is required at the time of the submittal of the land use application to offset costs associated with the proposed project. Unused portions of an escrow are returned to the applicant upon successful implementation of an approved plan. Notice of MeetinQ Attendance In order for the Planning Commission and the City Council to consider any application, the applicant or a designated representative must be present at the scheduled meeting. If not. the matter may be tabled until the next available agenda. Revised: 01-30-07 Page 2 of3 AQenda Deadline and Meetinq Schedule The deadline for submittal of land use applications is required according to the schedule outlined below. There are no exceptions. Planning Commission meetings are typically held on the first Wednesday of each month at 7:00 PM, though please contact City Hall to verify the meeting date and time. City Council meetings are held typically the last Monday of the same month at 7:00 PM. Meetings are held in the Council Chambers at the City of Arden Hills, 1245 West Highway 96, Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112, unless otherwise stated. Applicants are advised that additional meetings andlor workshops are scheduled when necessary upon approval of the Planning Commission. 2007 SCHEDULE ('subject to change) TENTATIVE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING" (Generally held on the first Wednesda at 7:00 .m. TENTATIVE CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE" (Generally held on the last Monda at 7:00 .m. AcknowledQement and Siqnature I acknowledge that I have read all of the information listed in the City of Arden Hills Land Use Application and fully understand that I am responsible for all costs incurred by the City related to the processing of this application. Property Owner Signature (Required) Date t;c- ~' '1- Ir) - II "7 Date Applicant Si9nature (If different than the property owner) Please contact the City Planner at (651) 762-7819 or by email atiames.lehnhoff@ci.arden-hills.mn.usif you have any questions regarding this application. Additional copies of this application form are available on the City's website: httD.//WWW.ci.arden-hil/s.mn.us Revised: 01-30-07 Page 3 of3 SEP-10-2007 14:26 RAMSEY CTY MAPPING ~ <~:O:U:B~ "Moo':' , ~ 'c;'i';'-'t'n'~'~' ~.-:. :~:hoi2:0:0:7: ' 'Mt'#: Taxpayer 1'77655 Total: EMV LMV ,I;m>.El'~~, ,S,C,~OP;I, P.:r,S,T, ,6.2,1, , , . 12,093,700 12,093,700 29=9 ~~!~~ AV~ N Dist: 2517 TIF Dist: ROSEVItLB MN 55113-1664 Plat: 02731 SECTION 28 TOWN '350 I-/,?I.I",I;, 1~ tv Sect Twnshp Range Lot Altej!nCl te 5t...or of v; >fIN, Ivt /v <; '> I Ol i 28 030 023 BEG ON CL OF CO RD E-2 AND 3044 46/100 FT SELY THEREON EXEMPT - K-12 SCB-PUBLIC 651 266 2160 P.04 Deeded acres 10.63 30 RANGE 23 Block Subd: Escrow Prop Address 1770 COUNTY ROAD E2 W NEW BRIGBTON MN 55112-2815 T Original Adj!Chg Payments Unpaid Bal Net Tax ~ Special Asmt Tot before P&I , < Penalty :-, Interest - Fees '-' * *Totals F2=Tier F14=Legal F16=Notes F17=APIN$ F19=OtherNames F24=MoreKeys A=GS B=ASM C=DQ E=TR F=SP B=TBST I=PRASC J=COJ I>=PA R=ADJ U=C1\MA Y=CMP v CL If"l +1 V1€ 1 ~il Ls 13\ (-' h -ed-~/lJ S C/eM \ ;; SEP-10-2007 14:26 RAMSEY CTY MAPPING 2/J..U/e>.!..VVI.l..Il.._"":v......>.J --"""5,---.1 --::;J--.----- R R 28.30.23.42.0002 2008 651 266 2160 P.05 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL OIST 621 BEG ON CL OF CO RO E-2 AND 344 46/100 FT SELY THEREON FROM W L OF SE 1/4 TH ELY ON SO CL 666 46/100 FT TH S 789 23/100 FT TH W 570 62/100 FT TH N 21 DEG 54 MIN W 215 16/100 FT TH NLY ON CURVE WITH RADIUS OF 686 2/10 FT FOR 410 19/100 FT TH N 12 OEG 21 MIN E 132 07/100 FT TO BEG (SUBJ TO RO)IN SEC 28 TN 30 RN 23 Deeded Acres: Plat; 02731 Lot: Desc; SECTION 28 TOWN Sct: 28 Twn: 030 X: .00 Y; F3=Exit F12=Cance1 10.63 Blk: 30 RANGE 23 Rng; 023 .00 z: .00 Bottom TOTAL P.05 - SEP-10- 2007 14 : 2S RAMSEY CTY MAPP I NG 651 266 2160 P . 02 """l ,'.1 . , , , , . , ., rI-"'l ,&0,....,.,.....,...,.,_,_..._,_,..,....,....,....._. , , , , , , I , " , , , , .,----- -.....--- - ,2,0,0,8, MOO!. ~ CalC thru: ,,9.1,1,0.1,2.0,0,7, Ml:'ii: Taxpayer '!3107S Total: EMV LMV Deeded acres .~;E,P;Bffl);E.N:T, ,S,C.H,OW.... .D.I.S,T. .6~,1., . , , 37,711,400 37,711,400 56.34 29~9 ~~~~ A-JE N Dist: 2517 TIF Dist: RO~;I~ ~ 5511~-1664 Plat: 02731 SECTION 28 TOWN 30 RANGE 23 '351> lilv'J ez Jo Sect Twnshp Range Lot Block Alternate Sl,ol'...vi"'", ,A') AI SSJ::?lo 28 030 023 PART OF SE 1/4 OF SW 1/4 Subd: Escrew LYING S~Y OF C/~ OF COUNTY EXEMPT - K-12 SCH-PUB~IC Prop Address 190Q ~ V~INE RD NEW BRIGHTO~ MN 55112-2841 T Qriginal Adj/Chg Payments Unpaid Bal Net Tax \-I \.,l Special Asmt 'rot before P&I , . Penalty ~ Interest - Fees '-' * *Totals F2=Tier F14=~egal F16=Notes F17=APINs F19=OtherNames F24=MoreKeys A=GS B::o:ASM C=DQ E=TR F=SP B=TBST I=PRASC J=COJ ~PA R=ADJ U=C1lMA y::o:CMP MDVl1dS V\Q~ 1~ (J ~ Sc~oc\ ) '. ~EP-10-2007 14:26 RAMSEY CTY MAPPING 651 266 2160 P.03 --------- INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST 621 ,.;,'.J.V/....V....' ....."'........"... --"2,---..1 --'='--,------ R R 28.30.23.21.0002 2008 PART OF SE 1/4 OF SW 1/4 LYING SLY OF C/L OF COUNTY ROAD F (SOBJ TO ilD,HWY & ESM'I'S IN SEC 21 TN 30 RN 23 & IN SD SEC 28 TN 30 RN 23 W 400 FT OF Nw 1/4 OF NE 1/4 LYING SLY OF CL OF COUNTY ROAD F TOGETHER WIT!! NE 1/4 OF NW 1/4 (SOBJ TO RD & ESMTS) IN SEC 28 TN 30 RN 23 Deeded Acres: Plat: 02731 Lot: Desc: SECTION 28 TOWN Sct: 28 Twn: 030 X: .00 Y: F3=Exit F12=Cancel I, ~.j 56.34 Blk: 30 RANGE 23 Rng: 023 .00 z: .00 Bottom c.. ell ~ ~ ..... 00. " - 0 '" 0 .;;: '" -= ~ (,J c 00. '" ~ 0:: '" ..... .-;:; = Ul ~ 00 "" Q,I 0 ..... , > t- O '" 't:l = = 0 ~ s - ~ ~ ~~1iI~ E .!la.::I: !a ~H. . ci5~!l~.... ~fi. 8;SB!/i. ~ ,', \.'\'\\08; <n ~ <n j g~]!~ ~otiiE ~ Ra ~ ~ ti<D<olm ~~~~tii " ." ~ " o '0 u " <8 'D o g '2 .." ." a M s ~ '~z,.~ ES~ ~ ~'fl ..... 0'" "'8""'0 -g5.~ ~ ~.~ ~~~ Q~ E .g ~ g ~.8;:: S'~2 8g;8 :,gg .- 0 li:) "-,0 g..8 .~"82 t::":t55 0.. 'J>~ 00 0,0 gj~~ ~~8 ~~ ~ ,0.. 000 ~~8 .".. ~e~ .s ~_ _"0 gg~ . . .- " 'g~ c .00 >-." 0 ~a~ :::l"'..s ~~s g~g Q.:s><:t" .o~ 8",,0 -g~ E "8"82 8.0 e~~ ~";.6 ~co ~3<l) .ou li3 u~ ~ -5.~~ .~ ~j .00 ;;.~~ . > . ~.=8 ~'2g ..il'" ~.9li3 ;20 s'oa -. ..".,,2 .J u '" S o ~ '" Iii ~ o '" " c . @. ~ '" 1l III g~]!~ 1II~~'5l! ~Q.;5i.!ij :l:J 0 Ql 0... ~ g;s it~. - s:; ""'B ~ ~<1l :: ~ .:::'J! "'fl. .,.,. :c '" ~ ti 'ilw L I!! c..~. .::. .E:! 'i 1!! ;:;I I:! Q 01 4-"' :Qlii'i.5l!1.l!1o~8i.~~I<fl ~@ ~ 8.5itl1~ ....','''_ ",+ "\'\'\\0 " ." ~ " o '0 o .E '" 8 '" " ] g c .g .g>.:<il cd...... E E6~ ~ ~.~ .- 0 ... <lfE-'O ~a~ ~ ~.8 ~" 0 ~~ s .S! ~ ~ "''''u =<2i) o.'ll~ g"'8 0"0 "E'" ";.s] e~~ :E ~~ E-<i::H . .$ g.8.f5 ~"'~ d~ .00 ~-5 .... ~ "'" o c 0 ~] 8 -g ~'l:I 2"'a! .58"a) '05(.) .~: t:e o ~~S ?>-g8 ~~.8 :88 i3l@~ ;'s"f <d<!)1n 8~~ "g$:S "8'8s 0"" 0.", ~19 .~ b"'~g ~€c'5 2 ~ <Ll <dgg ~ . ~ :€.€~ ~"'~ ."" -g", @< ~ ~ ~.Sb ;.E-g~ E:":fj-+ "'0" ~g~ .,.g" ,.., . U '" '" i5 ~ ~ Q,l ""' ... 00 - o o '5 00 ~ "'" ~ -= Q,l = Q,l - ~ <I.l - - ... == ~ ... ""' = Q,l 'il :> . ! rfi ~ o '" Middle schools Elementary schools ~;+x ~ (.fa ~ S,.l I p.,- "')'t ifta)~ ~ ~f. J( ~.,+ ~ S,d'cl I p~r ^,\~ POS Maps and Photographs Attachment 3B-2 ~ ~HILLS October 3, 2007, Planning Commission Meeting f , ~~u'" .~ ~'" ..... "g~~.~; ~~1i!! l':siH ~'5.-_&!!!!-f -~'i~':8 ~--~. go ~ "'i! ." il ~ ~ ~ \; ::c:'i '>=...., 3~-.iij_-e~-g.2'11 ~:a 8,~:~;a3: <ii-o.;'-<>lI <Il :a " o o '8 " "' ~ o o N Cl. ~ ~ = o ..... ~ ~ o ~ '" "0 = :: o ~ '" ] 0:1" . " " 'd o _ '~i-.~ ~g.g '@ g'~ .- 0 ... "'~ fr"'d ~5.~ 0" . ~ s'g 0" " g~ ~ ',,= ... 0 ~.2~ 8'];: 83g ~.E~ .- 0 <I) "'-~ E~ ~ ~~: !-< l:f'?~ <l:i ~ o:l J::01;l O~'d ~~~ ]~8 ::l () ~ "'" .0 "'t 0" " ]]8 'd", E1~] .~ @~ g 5 ~ .~ : 'd " =<5 c .00 t'~8 " . " g~<E ~8g OON "- - ",.~ .8 tl tl 'd~ 15~ ~ '"2,0.... o . " e~~ >.\ii;::l = ~o g.oC5 ~5<l) .00 ~ uA lj .s.q~ .~ ~j .~ 5] ~.~ !-<~ ~.s~ :E"Og E-<B . ~g~ ~.Q1l) ::8s~ 4:~B d r.Z '" ~ " - o o -= ~ 7Jl -= ell ..... := ~ <l.l ..... ;;.. " 8 . '" Ui '" u !3 o '" '$ o o ~ ......;;,. '" $ . .... ~ ~L.~..~'-~ .g~--~~ h~;;r ~~1;iil~ .e.-,Ol';'~,:;:: '. E,Q;::~ !;"z ~-l-85,~'~-~:<~'~- -~:_g-;~,-~ ::to ....._II1-a:;::: Vl O:;-N__:I: oil c.. ~ ~ Q.l .... .- IJJ - o o ..= <.J IJJ ..= OJ) .- := ~ Q.l .- >- '" "C = = o ~ ~ o " o '0 u <8 ~ o o N ." 11 Of o " o '0 o _ .~ >..~ egli <s",:g 00. .- ~ e ~~] ~ o..~ UO"'@ e irG 'oei3 :::,,;:: E .g e S ]...8 .-<.9 .... 6'"0<8 o~r- uoo 000 .~N .- 0 :u ,,-~ E.~ E .:::2112 ...:::CllCl) f- dU':l <Li~Of a.8:@ gj :~ ]~8 ~,s e ~~ 00" :;;~ 0 .0" 'O~ ~e"Q .8 ~~ .....~d) g 5 e . . 0 .- " '0 u :::.;3= 000 "'00 ~;a"2 5l ~<8 ~~g gON a:-e.,[ a.g i) "'O<E.c "'08 "E~2 @~~ .... <:'d .~ at>A5 ~~d -0. o 0 U " U 0 -B.iSe 'ai G ~ o....l ,~ [5 ~ g.'~E= j:I>'--:; ;;;.Sb ~]?;~ ..<<l~ ~.8 i) ~~s -("02 d J5 '" ~ Q " E o '" Ui "' u ~ o '" Q., e<:l ~ = ~ 0 .... .s; .... e<:l <l.l <.J ~ 0 " ~ '" p:; ~ <l.l - - - US .... = 00 ~ N = 0 , .... r-- .... 0 = ~ - e<:l :;.. ~ .~ ID ~~>lI ~5~"" ~ :8".::l<p..ijj..3:.<Il.!l......,a ~..~.SJ!!~.'2.<n .~ ~&.8>5\/u~'5: Vl " ." o . o '0 o o " ~ o o N "'~-"'-~'''' .!;.:.~:..::-o'" Q.:" ..'l!l ~:;15:3j -~ ,f_8ii>~ 'lli<b_:~_::__~ :~g-:g. 1;; O;;N......I...\fI '" ] (,j" . " . ~ o _ .~ >..S P"'2 "E ~~:9 ~ i;:l '2 .- 0 ... "'"8--0 ] 5.~ QUe;: ~ ~p~ ~~ E .,g e ~ .00 :::::<8... 8'-0<8 O~r-- .0:::0 dQ~ .;!l.D... o..Bll S.:!l E ","Q2 :.a ~ O.l f-< .", o.;i ~ .tii::: ::::: "0 ~€D _00 .00 00" .5.~~ '8 ~j " 0 0 ';"~~ . > . :.s~ ~]g" ". ctlv fil] ~ ~~8 ~"'O2 ~ u '" i5 o E . '" ,;; '" i;l " o '" I @. ~.i "'~ '. ," g ~ illll ~8HI,.. .E.2~~ 76_,U'@_'.<X2;;: _ _ -~,~---~~::?; f--:~:-...~.'!-i--i-':j.-.~i_J:,'~-..--~..--~-::!- " .0 o . o '0 o " <S ~ o o N ~ (\j ~ <l.l ... .... rJ:J <( -g os " " o "" o _ .-= >..~ ~]~ <8~~ o . 0 .- 0 .. -i3~ ft] ~ p.,;: i:l 3.:3 ~ @ ~ ~~ S 0<:,> a .-= .... 0 " ~ 0 '-:::<8.. E'"2~ 8 ~g "ON .~ " '~B2 E'~ ~ .~ -g.... ~ " 0 !-< ::r~" <l:i:::;<<:I co1a 0...::"0 ~~-E ]ag ~,g e 0_ ~ "'. 000 .;:.go 0" " ""'" 00"" 2:::; a ,= ~o g 5 ~ . " .- " "" 0 a~ 3 t'-g8 a:~ " 0 .O~ ....tag ~ON ;:ca-.t a.8 t "0<2"6 -E1!2 o . 0 @~~" >.t> ~ = nO . ,.,~ 19~ ~ 8 g ,s.~~ "g ~j .~ 5 ~ p,;C:j:: c:l ~ " ~.aS :..a'"O~ f-<.8 . ~g~ P-l.2<D ~5.g <.aE d ~ '" ~ il - o o -= u rJ:J ..... ... (\j ... = <l.l S <l.l - ~ '" ...... - .... == <l.l = .... ... = <l.l - (\j >- o 8 . '" "' OJ ~ '" o '" "'0 1\I 0 0:: '" "'0 C 1\I :;:: 0 c 0:: '" '" iij c > :;:: '" c -'" ~ 1\I 1\I ....I > E '" e .>< 1\I u. ....I - E en '" e $: u. .c .c - - ::l ::l 0 0 Ul Ul OJ Cl C C :;;; :;;; 0 0 0 0 ....I ....I o o ~ 1J en ~ .~ :I: 3:: Q) :> III "tl c: ::l o 2: - o ....I Cl C :;;; ~ 1\I a. E o ~ u. - en 1\I w Cl C :;;; o o ....I '0 0 J: (,) en '0 III >- 0 ... a:: III :>. - - C l: :J Q) 0 E (,) Q) E 0 W ~ u. !II - VI III .- w J: J: - Q) :J C Cl 0 l: en :;::::; :;;; Cl C 0 l: Q) 0 :;;; "iti ..J 0 0 > ..J MEMORANDUM DATE: October 3, 2007 PC Agenda Item 3. C TO: Plarming Commission FROM: James Lehnhoff, City Plarmer SUBJECT: Planning Case #07-018 - Continued Arden Plaza, LLC (Dennis Trooien) 3527 Lexington Avenue North Southwest corner of County Road E and Lexington Avenue Master Planned Unit Development, Final PUD for Phase 1, Preliminary Plat, and Final Plat ATTACHMENTS: 3C-1 3C-2 3C-3 Letter from Applicant, Revised Site Plans, and Color Renderings Traffic and Parking Safety Study Public Comments/Letters Requested Action The applicant is requesting approval of the Master Plarmed Unit Development, Final Plarmed Unit Development of Phase I, Preliminary Plat, and Final Plat of the Arden Plaza redevelopment proposal. Update On August 1,2007, the Plarming Commission held a public hearing for the proposed redevelopment of the Arden Plaza property, which is located at the southwest comer of County Road E and Lexington Avenue. The application was tabled at that meeting pending the submission of additional traffic data that was requested by Ramsey County and City Staff. The Plarming Commission reviewed and provided comments to the applicant on an updated version ofthe proposed Master Plan at the September 5, 2007, meeting. At that meeting, the applicant presented revised plans that incorporated a number of the suggested changes from the City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor October 3, 2007 C:\Documenls and SeuingsVackiefreppert\Local SettingslTempormy Internet Files\OLKDl \100307 - PC Report - Arden Plaza - Master PUD.doc Page 1 of 10 August 1,2007, meeting. No action was taken at that meeting because the requested traffic study was not yet complete. The applicant has submitted the following information for your review (Attachment 3C-l and 2): 1. Letter from the applicant summarizing the requested information and other changes, 2. Tree Preservation Plan (CIa) and Revised Landscaping Plan (Ll), 3. Updated Architectural Site Plan (ALl and Al.2) with parking stall information, 4. Color rendering of the proposed redevelopment, 5. Updated Signage Plan (A3.4), 6. Traffic and Parking Safety study. Proposal and Process 1. Project Description The 12.55 acre Arden Plaza property has a 52,580 square foot retail strip mall, and a 53,285 square foot office building. The office building is commonly referred to as the pod office building. The applicant proposes to demolish the office building, construct three new buildings, and subdivide the property into four lots: Lot Size Building Coverage (sf) % Building Coverage % Landscaping Lot 1 - Retail Strip 287,693 52,580 18.28% 27.40% Lot 2 - Walgreens 80,229 14,490 18.06% 28.50% Lo13 69,520 16,230 23.35% 23.60% Lot 4 44,075 14,300 32.44% 18.20% Total 481,517 97,600 20.27% 26.19% Requirement 13,000 or more 40% or less 25% or more *Lot and building numbers are from Sheet A 1.1 in Attachment 3D-1. The coverage numbers of Lot 3 and 4 are subject to change during the site plan review process for those properties. The retail strip mall would remain unchanged. The proposed tenant for Lot 2 is a Walgreen's store. The developer does not yet have tenants for lots three or four. This proposal technically includes four requests: 1. Master Plarmed Unit Development for Phases 1-3 of the Arden Plaza Redevelopment 2. Final Planned Unit Development for Phase 1 of the Arden Plaza Redevelopment 3. Preliminary Plat 4. Final Plat This report will only address the revised information included in the attachments. Please refer to the September 5 planning case report for the complete set of plans. Unless otherwise noted in this report, the plans in the September 5 plarming case report still apply. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor October 3, 2007 C:\Documents and SettingsVackiefreppert\Local Settings\Temporary Internet FileslOLKDl 1100307 - PC Report - Arden Plaza - Master PUD.doc Page 2 of 10 2. Planned Unit Development (PUD) Process: The Plarmed Unit Development (PUD) process is typically at least a two step process. The fIrst step is the Master PUD, and the second step is the Final PUD. In some instances, the Final PUD or a portion of the Final PUD is reviewed with the Master PUD. In other instances, the development is separated into phases over a period of time. This application is a hybrid version of these two options, which is permissible. The PUD process is a tool that provides additional flexibility for developments that an underlying zoning district would not otherwise allow. For example, a PUD may change the setbacks, lot coverage, lot sizes, parking requirements, signage, building height, building materials, landscaping requirements, etc. The process is meant to create a better development than the standard regulations may otherwise allow. While each PUD process can be somewhat unique, it is a cOmmon processed used by many cities. Typically, the PUD process cannot be used to permit uses that would not otherwise be permitted in the underlying zone. If a property is subdivided into multiple properties during the PUD process, it is still often viewed as one continuous development. The development as a whole would be expected to meet the landscaping, stormwater, and other similar requirements. For example, one property in the PUD may have forty percent building coverage; however, the development as a whole does not exceed 25 percent building coverage to maintain conformance with the underlying zone. In order to maintain shared amenities such as landscaping and stormwater ponds, the development is required to create a legal entity to manage and maintain the shared amenities. During the Master PUD stage, the City works with the applicant to set an overall design framework or standard for a proposed development, which generally includes the design standards, the size of the development, and what, if any, deviations from the underlying zoning district will be permitted. Once the Master PUD is approved, the applicant then creates a development that conforms to the design standards for the Final PUD stage. The level of detail is guided by the type and scale of the development as well as the guidance or flexibility within the Zoning Code. 3. Surrounding Area: North Commercial B-2: General Business District Hotel South Commercial B-2: General Business District Office City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor October 3, 2007 C:\Documents and Settings)jackiefreppert\Local SettingslTemporary Internet FileslOLKDl \100307 - PC Report - Arden Plaza - Master PUD.doc Page 3 ofIO East Commercial C2: General Commercial & OFC: Gas Station/Retail/Office Office West Commercial B-2: General Business District Interstate 35W Retail strip mall and office building B-2: General Business District 4. Site Data: Commercial 12.55 Acres (546,717) The elevation of the lot is lower than Lexington Avenue. There is a stormwater pond in the southeast corner of the property. Plan Evaluation As noted above, this report will only address the revised information included in the attachments. Please refer to the September 5 planning case memos for the complete set of plans. Unless otherwise noted in this report, the plans in the September 5 plarming case report still apply. 1. Sign Plan Proposal The applicant has submitted a revised sign since the September 5, 2007, planning case report. The applicant has reduced the size of the proposed freestanding sign for the proposed Walgreen's store at the County Road E and Lexington Avenue intersection. However, the attachment includes a color rendering of the previous request and of the revised request (Attachruent 3C- I). The rendering is looking toward the property from the intersection. Because the property is adjacent to County Road E and Lexington Avenue, it is in sign district 4 and 5. The Sign Code does not indicate which sign district is the controlling district. Sign Code Sign District (Section 1240) 4 5 Area 60 sf 80 sf Wall Lighting E/I/B EII/B Area 80 sf 100 sf Freestanding Height 22f 16f Lighting E/I/B E/I/B E1I/B: exlernal, inlernal,orbacklil In a typical multi-business development, each lot would be permitted one freestanding sign and each business on the lot would be permitted a full allocation of wall signage (i.e. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor October 3, 2007 C:lDocuments and SettingsVackiefreppert\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLKD1\100307 - PC Report - Arden Plaza - Master PUD.doc Page 4 of 10 60 or 80 square feet per business). In lots with two road frontages, which is the case in this application, a second half size freestanding sign (40 or 80 square feet) would be permitted. However, the PUD process does permit flexibility in applying the Sign Code to allow for different types of developments. Revised Wall Sign Plan (square feet) Exterior From September 5,2007, Plan Set Wall Walgreen's Revised Building 2 Building 3 Original (Seot5) East 67.53 63.85 46.9 80 North 67.53 63.85 69.6 80 West 36.83 27.62 69.6 0 South 36.83 0 0 0 Total 208.72 155.32 186.1 160 The property currently has the following freestanding signs: . Lexington Avenue/County Road E intersection: -120 square feet and -17 feet tall; . Lexington Avenue entrance: -80 square feet and -17 feet tall; and, a . Small entrance sign at the County Road E entrance. The applicant is proposing to replace the three freestanding signs with the following SIgnS: Proposed Freestanding Signs square feet Lexington Avenue Entrance 100 Lexington Avenue/County Road E Corner 45 County Road E Entrance 100 As noted above, the applicant has reduced the size of the proposed freestanding corner at the County Road E and Lexington A venue intersection. The size has been reduced from 115 square feet to 45 square feet (Sheet A3.4 of Attachruent 3C-l). The measured area of a wall or freestanding sign only includes the sign face, which is the text, graphic and/or other sign message. The sign area does not include the sign structure. The total freestanding sign area on the property would increase from an estimated 200 square feet to 245 square feet with this modified proposal. The existing mature trees at the Lexington Avenue and County Road E intersection provide a significant amount of screening for the pod office building and the strip mall. The screening makes a freestanding sign at the intersection somewhat necessary to City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeiingfor October 3, 2007 C:\Documents and Settings)jackieJreppertlLocal SettingslTemporary Internet Files\OLKD1\Ja0307 - PC Report - Arden Plaza - Master PUD.doc Page 5 of 10 increase the visibility of the businesses on the property. However, if the trees near the comer are removed as proposed, the visibility for a building near that intersection is increased and the need for a freestanding sign at the comer is reduced. While the existing freestanding sign at the comer advertises for a number of the businesses on the property, the proposed new sign for the comer would only advertise the Walgreen's store. Since the proposed Walgreen's store and its requested wall signage will be visible from County Road E, Lexington Avenue, and the intersection (as shown in the submitted rendering), the need for a separate freestanding Walgreen's sign is diminished. The freestanding signs at the two entrance points to Arden Plaza, which could include a Walgreen's sign, do appear to be needed for advertising and way-finding for the other businesses on the property. This is not a sign content or message issue for the comer freestanding sign; it is a total signage area issue. If the trees near the comer were to remain, then a freestanding sign would likely be warranted. 2. Tree Preservation and Landscaping Plan At the request of the Planning Commission, the applicant has submitted a tree preservation plan showing the trees that are proposed to be preserved or removed (sheet CIa in Attachruent 3C-l). A revised landscaping plan has also been submitted (sheet Ll in Attachment 3C-l). The previous landscaping plan proposed removing 364 caliper inches of trees, preserving 662 caliper inches oftrees, and planting 228 caliper inches of trees. A total of 890 caliper inches would be in place upon full implementation of the landscaping plan. According to the revised landscaping plan, 412 caliper inches will be removed, 592 caliper inches will be preserved, and 224 caliper inches will be planted. Upon full implementation of the landscaping plan, there would be 816 caliper inches, which is a reduction of 74 caliper inches. According to the applicant, the landscaping plan was revised because the proposed improvements at the Lexington Avenue entrance will require additional existing trees to be removed due to their proximity to the new curb and sidewalk. The applicant also stated that the proposed improvements on both sides of the Lexington Avenue entrance are proposed to be within one foot of the existing trees, which is not enough space to guarantee that the trees will not be damaged during construction and does not provide adequate room for the trees to continue healthy growth in the future. If the property was vacant and being developed for the first time, approximately 305 caliper inches of trees would be required. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor October 3, 2007 C:\Documents and SettingsVackiefreppertlLocal Settings\Temporary Internet FilesIOLKD1\l00307 - PC Report - Arden Plaza - Master PUD.doc Page 6 of 10 At the September 5, 2007, Plamring Commission meeting, there was a concern about the parking in front ofthe strip mall and pedestrian safety. The revised plans include pedestrian walkways along with the parking stalls to provide safer entering and existing the strip mall; however, that results in a loss of 15 parking stalls. The submitted traffic study addresses the safety concerns of this type of parking. The submitted traffic and parking study indicates that the remaining parking should be sufficient. 3. Parking Configuration 4. Traffic and Parking Safetv Studv The applicant has submitted the parking study requested by Ramsey County and the City. The study is currently being reviewed by Ramsey County Public Works, and the City has contracted with SRF Consulting to review the study on behalf of the City. Unfortunately, the reviews were not ready in time for the release of this report. The reviews will be sent out as soon as they are sent to the City. According to the submitted traffic study, the number of trips in and out of the property will increase approximately 55 percent due to the different mix of uses. The actual square feet of building space would not significantly change. The results of the traffic study indicate that the Lexington Avenue and County Road E intersection currently operates at Level of Service (LOS) E, which is the second worst rating, and it will operate at LOS F in 2009 with or without the proposed development. However, the study proposes mitigation measures that may increase the LOS at the intersection to a D rating, which would be an improvement over current conditions at the intersection. The County and SRF Consulting are analyzing the proposed mitigation measures to determine their effectiveness. The traffic study reviews the two access points to the property on pages seven and eight. Those results are also being evaluated and should be ready before the Plarming Commission meeting. Please note that the reviews from SRF Consulting and Ramsey County are unlikely to offer a recommendation on whether or not the redevelopment proposal should be approved. Their reviews will likely focus on the methodology used to generate the reports, their results, and the validity of the proposed mitigation measures. Resident Comments City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor October 3, 2007 C:\Documents and Settings)jackiefreppertlLocal SettingslTemporary Internet FileslOLKD1II00307 - PC Report - Arden Plaza -Master PUD.doc Page 7 of 10 Notice was published in the Shoreview-Arden Hills Bulletin and mailed to properties within 500 feet of the property for the August I, 2007, Planning Commission meeting. A new notice is typically not sent when applications are tabled. Staff has received a number ofletters and emails related to this application, which are included in Attachment 3C-3. Only the letters received since the September 5, 2007, Plarming Commission meeting are included with this report. The previous letters were into the record with the August and September 2007 reports. Staff Analvsis Staff provided a draft set of eighteen conditions in the August I and the September 5, 2007, plarming case memo. The draft conditions that were clearly incorporated into the proposed redevelopment plan have been removed to avoid repetition. The conditions focus on phase one, which is the proposed Walgreen's building. When site plan reviews for phases two and three are submitted, additional conditions for those phases can be applied at that time. Complicated development proposals rarely lend themselves to a clear answer on whether or not it should be approved. Traffic impacts, parking needs, building layouts, landscaping requirements, signage requests, the requested drive-through, and other impacts are all part of the evaluation. While a number of residents have expressed concern over a national chain potentially building in Arden Hills, the City does not have the authority to deny the application based on the potential tenants if the proposed use is a permitted use in that zone. The application should be reviewed based on the potential impacts ofthe proposed redevelopment. The Planning Commission needs to make on a finding on whether the proposed development will impose a significant negative impact on the community prior to making a motion. Ifthere is a significant negative impact that carmot be mitigated, that impact should be noted for the record. If the impact can be mitigated, a condition mitigating that impact should be included ifit already is not. Should the Planning Commission recommend approval of this application to the City Council, Staff proposes the following nineteen conditions be included with this proposal. I. Conformance with Plans. The project shall be completed in accordance with the revised plans submitted as amended by the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Plarruing Commission and City Council. 2. Permit Timeline. The applicant shall obtain a building permit within one year of the Final PUD approval for phase one or the approval shall expire unless extended by the City Council prior to the approval's expiration date. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor October 3, 2007 C:\Documents and SettingsVackiefreppertILocal SettingslTemporary Internet Files10LKDJ\100307 - PC Report - Arden Plaza - Master PUD.doc Page 8 of 10 3. Final PUD Timeline. The applicant shall apply for a Final PUD of phase two and three within three years ofthe Master PUD approval or the approval shall expire unless extended by the City Council prior to the approval's expiration date. 4. Tree Preservation. The applicant shall explore the option of relocating as many of the existing mature trees to other portions of the property as feasible. 5. Landscapine: Timeline. The landscaping plan shall be fully implemented with phase one. Portions of the landscaping plan may be delayed for construction of phase two and/or three subject to City Plarmer approval. 6. Landscapine: Escrow. The applicant shall submit a financial surety in the amount of 125 percent of the cost of the landscaping improvement for all three phases prior to the issuance of any building permits for each phase. 7. Sie:nae:e. The proposed monument sign at the County Road E and Lexington Avenue intersection shall be removed. 8. RCWD. The applicant shall obtain approval from the Rice Creek Watershed District and all other applicable permitting agencies prior to the issuance of any building permits. Copies of such permits shall be provided to the City. 9. Common Space Manae:ement. The applicant shall submit an agreement for shared management and maintenance of the parking areas, landscaping, and stormwater areas prior to executing the final plat. The agreement shall be subj ect to City Attorney approval prior to the issuance of any building permits. 10. Retainine: Wall. The applicant shall replace the existing wood retaining wall with block, stone, or other similar materials that are compatible with the building materials used in the development. The retaining wall may be removed entirely if the site is properly graded. 11. Fencine:. The fence along Lexington Avenue shall be replaced with a fence that is compatible with the building materials used in the development. The materials shall be subject to City Plarmer approval. 12. Lexine:ton Avenue Sidewalk. The asphalt path along Lexington Avenue shall be replaced with a concrete sidewalk that is at least six feet in width. The sidewalk shall extend from the sidewalk at County Road E to the Lexington Avenue entrance. 13. Screenine:. The dumpsters and mechanical equipment shall be fully screened from public view with fencing and/or landscaping. 14. Parkine:. The applicant shall provide the required number of ADA parking spaces as determined by the Building Official. 15. Fire Marshal Review. The plans shall be subject to fire marshal approval before building permits are issued. 16. Ene:ineer Review. Final grading, drainage, and utility plans shall be subject to approval by the Public Works Director and City Engineer prior to the issuance of any building permits. 17. Traffic Mitie:ation Measures. The occupancy permit for phase one shall be contingent upon implementation ofthe following traffic mitigation measures: a. TO BE ADDED AFTER THE SRF CONSULTING AND RAMSEY COUNTY REVIEW. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for October 3, 2007 C:1Documents and SettingsIJackiefreppertlLocal SettingslTemporary Internet Files10LKDl\l00307 - PC Report - Arden Plaza ~ Master PUD.doc Page 9 of 10 18. General Rel!ulation Conformance. The applicant shall conform to all other City regulations. 19. Development Al!reement. A developer's agreement shall be prepared by the City Attorney and subject to City Council approval. The agreement shall be executed prior to the issuance of any building or demolition permits. 1. Recommend Approval with Conditions: Motion to recommend ar;r;roval ofPlauning Case 07-018 for a Master Plarmed Unit Development, Final PUD of Phase 1, Preliminary Plat, and Final Plat at 3527 Lexington Avenue based on the submitted plans and the seventeen conditions in the October 3, 2007, plauning case report. Proposed Motion Lanl!ual!e 2. Recommend Approval as Submitted: Motion to recommend ar;r;roval of PI arming Case 07- 018 for a of Planning Case 07-018 for a Master Plarmed Unit Development, Final PUD of Phase 1, Preliminary Plat, and Final Plat at 3527 Lexington based on the findings offact and the submitted plans in the October 3, 2007, plarming case report. 3. Recommend Denial: Motion to recommend denial ofPlarruing Case 07-018 for a of Plauning Case 07-018 for a Master Plarmed Unit Development, Final PUD of Phase I, Preliminary Plat, and Final Plat at 3527 Lexington based on the following findings of fact... 4. Table: Motion to table Plarruing Case 07-018 for a of PI arming Case 07-018 for a Master Planned Unit Development, Final PUD of Phase 1, Preliminary Plat, and Final Plat at 3527 Lexington: a specific reason and/or information request should be included with a motion to table. Deadline for Al!encv Actions The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on July 23,2007. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must act on this request by November 19, 2007 (120 days). The City extended the review period beyond the initial 60 day review period, which expired on September 20, 2007. The City may, with the consent ofthe applicant, extend the review period beyond the initial 120 days. Attachments 3C-l Letter from Applicant, Revised Site Plans, and Color Renderings 3C-2 Traffic and Parking Safety Study 3C-3 Public Comments/Letters C:\Documents and SettingsyackiefreppertlLocal SettingslTemporary Internet FilesIOLKDJ\l00307 - PC Report - Arden Plaza - Master PUD.doc Page 10 of 10 City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for October 3, 2007 Attachment 3 C-1 Letter from Applicant, Revised Site Plans, and Color Renderings ~ ~HILLS October 3, 2007, Planning Commission Meeting 4' ~'.l , [g)'O' '~:~~D~"" -,' '.\ )h"'''''''''' ,': ': :,' ',,' '::":,h ,< "''''''''::,; Y", ,,); m"", "".: "<:,.:' ;,\:,,:: I,q:;", ::iii ". ". '. ." properties 752 Stillwater Road Mahtomedi, MN 55115 Fax 651631 1500 Voice 6512477007 dermis@dennisproperties.com www.detmisproperties.com September 17, 2007 James Lehnhoff City Plarmer City of Arden Hills 1245 West Highway 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112 Re: Arden Plaza Plarming Case #07-018 , Dear James: The following is being transmitted to you today in response to questions and concerns raised in prior meetings: 1. Rendering and elevation of southwesterly view from Lexington Avenue and County Road E. 2. Landscaping Plan showing trees removed and trees retained. 3. Two photographs of potential garden center. 4. Information on parking current number of parking spaces and number lost. 5. Traffic analysis previously requested by the County, City Engineer, and Plarming Commission. This includes an analysis indicating that the "head in" parking in front of the existing retail building is safe. In addition, we are including a revised plan that shows pedestrian access areas from the existing retail building to increase the safety of pedestrian access to the parking lot. Please note that we did ask our plarmers to determine the impact of rearranging the parking to avoid the "head in" parking, and they indicate that we would have a net loss of 15 stalls in that rearrangement. 6. Revised landscape plan. Earlier this summer we planted new landscaping materials in the planters next to the existing retail building, and we are including two photographs ofthat. Ai ~'" 7. Typically, Walgreen's installs a neon mortar and pestle sign on the inside back wall of entry tower. Walgreen's has agreed to soften this by replacing this sign with a decal graphic ofthe mortar and pestle applied to the back wall, and illuminated by the lights within the tower. 8. Our exterior lighting consultant indicates that the parking lot lighting will be a "white" light that is used almost universally in new retail centers. High Pressure Sodium lights are discouraged because they are not as safe and distort colors. 9. Pope Associates calculated the pervious green areas of each building pad. The results are: a. Walgreen's Pad: 28.5% b. East Central Pad: 23.6% c. South Pad: 18.2% d. Existing Retail Pad: 27.4% Overall, the PUD site exceeds the 25% minimum. Let me know if you need additional information for the next Plarming Commission meeting. Very truly yours Denny Trooien ) " 0' H J / ./ , ~ ~ II j -.-=- 0= ~/,"f(OAD /' l(. - -:.':: - -L-:; =..,- H~~ ~;;;.... _R.2:.,W. [jEB!.9~1'lli. _ ,61-STL "" ~, .991Ji'Ql-Y " ./ , ---.::---- , " ...::..,,----;;.,. '- 42-5TL "- , , I MDNUMEN'r\SIGN ! ----,'I 63-BE8 I , \ , , ,!il-AJS '1'- 15~ST ! j :) !f 71 I 3illES I \ I' > . oj <[ I .. II}' U ,1'1'\ I 1.~JI " I r I: \ \ ,! II 1\ e\'O l II 1 1.1 \1 ~!I II \ 'II j 1 l1GS~ \ I' ! I, ~ V , i :")1' I ff 'II L" I -JTl..,- I \,1111,/ ! I -I I I . I, r I ! i II: '11-sCJ '0 T ! J~BES Ii-Gf"S .! ~\; ~:;~ l~GFS " / o I ," I II 'I I, ~I II II n '\ i' ~,l ' 1:' /1 ;i " :1 /j \ \ , t"''''~,'- ~..... \ BENCiWARK INFORMAllON: Top nut hydrant east aide lexington Ave. at Southwest comer of IIlKlsUng bundlng No. 3550 E11lwtran .. 945.6$ (H.G-V.O. - 1929) L _ LANDSCAPE NOTES 1. VERIFY ALL I.A)lDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS WITH REMOVALS AND SITE WORK. 2. All. DISTURBED lANDSCAPED AREAS, NOT INDICATED AS PlANTING BEDS, ARE TO BE SODDED. SOD IS TO BE PRIMARILY KENTUCKY BWEGRASS, FREE OF LAWN GRASS WEEDS. REPLACE DAMAGED LAWN GRASS WITH SOD AS DIRECTED BY TARGET ON-SITE REPRESENTATIVE. W<TCH INTO EXISTING. .3. CONTRACTOR TC VERIFY PLANTS REQUIRED AS REFl..ECTED .oN PLAN. 4. AU. LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL HAVE TOPSDIL PlACED AT MINlt.1Ut.1 DEPTH .of 4" FCR SOD/NATIVE AREAS, '2~ FOR SHRU8/PERENNIAL/ANNUAL 8EDS, AND 24" fOR TREE AREAS. 5. AU. PLANTING 8EOS TO BE EDGED WllH COIolMERCIAl GRADE VIIM. EDGER, "EOG-K1NG", B'f OLY-OLA, OR APPROVED EQUAl.. AND ANCHORED 4' C.C. WITH METAl SPIKES. 6. SHREDDED HARDWOOD t.1ULCH SHALL 8E A MINIMUM OF 4~ IN DEPTH, FREE OF AU DELETERIOUS MATERIAL AND LOCA.TED IN AlL LANDSCAPE 8EDS. MULCH TO BE COLORED, RE:D CANYON, Erl' S'(lVA, OR APPROVED EQUAL MULCH TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER. 7. SINGLE TREE AND SHRUB PLANTlNGS SHALL HAVE A 4" DEPTH SHREDDED H6.RDWOOO MULCH RING ARDUND EACH BASE. DECIOUDUS PLANT MATERIAl.. SHALL H6.VE A MINIMUM .... FOOT DIAMETER RING, EVERGREEN PLANT MATERIAL SHALL HAVE A RING TO THE DRIP UNE. 8. EXISTING TREES AND SHRUBS TO REMAIN, THROUGHOUT THE PROPERlY, SH6.LL BE PRUNED Te RE/.4OVE DCA!) OR UNDESIRABLE UMBS AND Te SHAPE PLANT FOR DESIRABLE APPEARANCE. PRCTECT EXISTING TREES, SEE REMOVALS/TREE PRESERVATICN PLAN fOR MlDmCNAL INFeRMATION. 9. CDNTRACTeR Te DISPCSE OF AU. REMOVAlS .oFF-SITE, SEE REMOVAL PLANS FDR ADDmCNAL LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS. 1.0. CONTRACTDR TO WATER PLANT MATERIAL DURING INSTALlATION AND fOR A 60 ESTABUSHMENT PERI.oD. VOLUME .oF WATER T.o BE PER PLANT REQUIREMENT FOR ESTABUSHMENT AND NORMAL GROWTH. 11. CONTRACTDR 1'0 WARRANlY NEW SOD FDR 60 DAYS AND NEW PLANTlNGS FOR ONE YE'AR UPDN PROJECT COMPLETION AND TARGET ON-SITE REPRESENTAlNE'S ACCEPTANCE. 12. IRRIGATE WITH AUTOMATIC UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION SYSTD.4 AT AU. PlANTED AREAS WITHIN LiMlTS AS SHOWN. SYSTEM SHALL BE COMPLETE. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS FOR lANDSCAPE ARCHITECT APPROVAL _ LANDSCAPE PLANT SCHEDULE KEY Q1Y. COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME S.' ROOT REMARKS SPACING '". 4 AUTUMN B1.A2E IAAPLE ACER X FREEMANI 'AUTUMN B1.A2E' 2SCAl FUu.. J' SIR. ~, . ,~, "",,'",. J' .., LEADER. RSC 7 PINK SPIRES CRAB MALUS 'PINK SPIRES' " NOV CROTCH , C SYRINGA RETlCUtATA . '"'" SSC 16 SPRING SNOW CRAB MALUS 'SPRING SNOW' ,. SINGLE BHS 7 BlACK HILLS SPRUCE PICEA GlAUCA DENSATA a'Hi ,., SCJ " SCANOlA JUNIPER JUNIPERUS SABINA 'SCANDlA' 24"SPD 5 CONT. 3' D.C. TNY J6 TAUNTDN YEW TAXUS X ldEDlA 'TAUNTONI' 24~ SPD '5 CCNT. 3' O.C. WW 18 WELCH JUNIPER JUNIPERUS SCOPULORUM 'WELCHI' "'/iT '7 CONT. FULL 4' D.C. FORM TO GTA 44 TECHNY GLDBE ARBORVITAE THUJA OCCIDENTAUS 'TECHNY' 24~ HT 15 CONT. G"'" 4' C.C. D'H '" DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLE DIERVlLLA LONICERA ~8. Hi '5 CCNT. 3' C.C. ALC ,,, AlPINE CURRANT RIBES AlPINUld 18"HT '5 CONT. 2' D.C. 0" J6 DWARF KOREAN ULAC SYRINGA PATULA 'MISS KIM' 1S"HT 5 CONT. 3' D.C. CFS 197 GOLD FLAME SPIREA SPIRAEA X BUMALDA 'GOLD . .3' C.C. m ,OJ STELlA DE DRC DAYULY H9dEROCALUS 'STELLA DE ORC' 2-YEAR I' CONT. 18~ D.C. OSH 60 GDLDEN STANDARD HOSTA HOSTA 'GOLD STANDARD 2 YEAR I' CONT. 36" O.C. 'ES 99' BlACKEYEDSUSAN RUDBECXlA HIRTA HEAR I' CCNT. 24" D.C. AJS '" AlJTlJMN JOY SEOUM SEDUM 'AUTUt.4N JOY' 'YEAR I' CCNT. lS" D.C. _ PLANT LEGEND DECIDUOUS SHADE TREES o GREEN ASH, HONEYLOCUST, UNDEN, MAPLE, OAK SHRUB / PERENN~ P~NGS ~ 0 JUNIPER, ARBORVrrAE, SPIREA, OAYULY, HOSTA ORNAMENTAL TREES PINK SPIRE CRAB, SPRING SNCW CRAB, JAPANESE TREE ULAC o EXISTING TREES o 0 EXISTING DECIDUOUS *" * E)<JSTING EVERGREEN EVERGREEN TREES o BLACK HILlS SPRUCE, AUSTRIAH PINE, COLCRADO GREEN SPRUCE _ CITY REQUIREMENTS TREES REQUIRED IN TOTAL CALIPER INCHES = GROSS FLOOR AREA DMCED BY 320 GROSS BUILDING FLOOR AREA = 97,600 S.F. 97,600/320 = 305 CAL INCHES. NORTH ~ TOTAL CALIPER INCHES TO BE REMOVED = 412 TOTAL CALIPER INCHES TO BE PRESERVED TOTAL CALIPER INCHES PROPOSED WITHIS PLAN TOTAL CALIPER INCHES = 59' ~...22i 816 50' ~ ~~oe~a~~ 15050 23rd Avenue North Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 T763-746-1600 F763-746-16S9 11110lndustrialCirdeNW,SuileE ElkRi~er,Minnesola55330 T763-241-0108 F763-241-8351 www.schoellmadson.com PROJECT ARDEN PLAZA REDEVELOPMENT SOUTHWEST QUADRANT COUNTY ROAD E I LEXINGTON AVE ARDEN HILLS, MN CUENT ARDEN PLAZA, LLC 4255 WHITE BEAR PARKWAY, SUITE 1550 WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110 651.247.7.007 CDNSULTANTS REVISIONS -7-02.(17 City Submittal 9.17.(17 CltyCDI'lImenls I hereby certlfythatthls plan,apeclficaUon. orreportw8s prepared by me or under my directsupervlslonandthatlamaduly Licensed Professional Engineerunder the laws of the State of MInnesota. David Roedel OATE:_L1C.NO.: CHECKED8Y PDSIDR DESIGNE08Y JO ORAWN BY '0 PRDJECTND. 64546-001 om 7_2-07 TITLE SHEET LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEETNUMBER L1 ~ I BENa-IMARK INFORMATION: Top nut hydrQl\t $Ilsl side Lexington AVll. ot Southwest comer of existing bundlng No. 3~50 Elewtlon - 945.85 (N.G.V.D. - 1929) L "J., "o~ ...~, "'~. "0; HE' ,', "E "ROAD N89'41'lij"E, 492.75~~"P .." " -'- J, I 1004 CALIPER INCHES 592 CALIPER INCHES 412 CALIPER INCHES TREE PRESERVATION NOTES ~"" , CE "".'.'''''0 "".1 ,",,,;,;,, !:I EXISTING TREE TOTALS * SAVED + REMOVED -"- , // .--/ .l'~ ,~ ' ~, ~',,;dr~'- / "",d' ,,',c'e';"'o -He,!, COUNTY /-<l"~ ~.f- E "m"""'''~'::,~.' 50" ($l""dn." '''.0 ,,,..,p;;::::::;",,,,, TREE LEGEND --/'-- NUMBER CALIPER lREENAME SAVE INCHES I 18 ASH (Fraxinus americana Y 2 12 ASH Fraxinus americana) y 3 10 ASH (Fraxinus americana) y , 12 ASH (Fraxinus americana) y 5 12 ASH (Fraxinus americana) Y 6 12 ASH (Fraxinus americana) y 7 12 ASH (Fraxinus americana) y 8 I' ASH (Fraxinus americana) y 9 I' ASH (Fraxinus americana. Y 10 I' ASH {Fraxinus americana y 11 I' ASH (Fraxinus americana) y 12 I' ASH (Fraxinus americana y 13 I' ASH (Fraxinus americana) Y I' 26 COTIONWOOD (Populus) Y 15 20 COTIONWOOD (Populus) Y 16 24 COTIONWOOD Pooulus) Y 17 I' ASH (Fraxinus americana Y 18 18 ASH (Fraxinus americana) N 19 I' ASH (Fraxinus americana) N 20 16 ASH (Fraxinus americana) N 21 I' ASH (Fraxinus americana N 22 10 ELM (Ulmus americana) N 23 18 ASH (Fraxinus americana) N 24 18 ASH (Fraxinus americana) N 25 20 ASH (Fraxinus americana N 26 20 ASH (Fraxinus americana) N 27 20 ASH (Fraxinus americana) N 28 22 ASH (Fraxinus americana) N 29 18 ASH (Fraxinus americana N 30 18 ASH (Fraxinus americana) N 31 16 ASH (Fraxinus americana) N 32 16 ASH (Fraxinus americana) N 33 I6 ASH (Fraxinus americana) N 34 12 ASH (Fraxinus americana) N 35 I' MAPLE (Acer) N 36 16 MAPLE (Acer N 37 I' MAPLE (Acer) N 38 I' ASH (Fraxinus americana) N 39 I' ASH (Fraxinus americana) N 40 12 ASH (Fraxinus americana) N 'I I' ASH (Fraxinus americana) N 42 I' ASH (Fraxinus americana) N 43 I' ASH (Fraxinus americana) N 44 8 MAPLE (Acer Y 45 8 MAPLE (Acer) Y 46 8 MAPLE (Acer) Y 47 8 MAPLE (Acer Y '8 8 MAPLE (Acer) y '9 6 MAPLE (Acer) Y n-L u.=ElUF<'''UNO """'-"'''EI.l'CT1'1JC unufY& .rotS1l<,^Nl~,c_,!""wAY ~:;: :1L::s~":o ~ ,~o,,~_: .... -89'41'1S"E ! "1.0 II .~~ CD '..,~ PER ,.~,"":::, ';;,.~,;i,; !{89'41'lS'tvE A = ASH M = MAPLE PI = PINE CN = COTTONWOOD '<S,8S' , A-## 0## -TREE lYPE / SIZE ~, '. ". -1"_. ~-,C"":""v-'-' --.'\0_, -"------ -_ -' ,- ---~, "'""tlI.,-- . '''!!''f'' ,.,': '''''~':,; ",-//-J ""A.""_~ , f' .,~i'.' " "",I I ' ';;\,}jWi[, i ~ -_.;,~ ~ I: t " -TREE NUMBER .~~~ ! @ o -EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN -EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED , W6.~. '-(,. ; eo, TREE PRESERVATION CHART ."~f Sl,c:C;[,uU'.".:G ",~ :\500 "'.7 , ,':l<.' , ,,,,,-"'>< , 'I~,'- ,IP.I< \I~I 11t'i'IJ li!l- 11',1 \',11, l'llli l',:: ' I~ jlif ,e II~JI L"Im, 'Hi1;lil ''',,;;; \\~- <I , :!,!: 1:lili lilll,1 ~ I, ~ .J" 'lil'l I,' 11(1 Iii,! " il"i' ,J lit,,: I,' 0; lili' 1<:J~ll!1 r .F ,'171 ......,.,,.' "',,j '~-~:~i~~{~'~:~~'~SQ!;!,~~?i~::~!1frfr'1~'OBttJ"Z;m~~~};\~"tJ;:'Jf~r~'~~'" ;; ..... '"", .~, cC'," -r,~ \ //" i~1 - - ~.~"_o''';''''",il,ll\:-Y,'. \ \ d ""~c::::z:j ~'''. '" ~:T--\~,J1~li," ~I T ,_ _.>' ~ ill I I ' \.m, .1.... '''' - --:'--' ';, "" " \../' \ \ I "" ~_' \ { ','I' , /.,,~, I ,o<a, -;,,,_, ~,: .,,/~..., \,""~ .... / , .", D'-~.' ~ .' " ", ,I \'u\( I=~ ~I;' 'H'._' \\\ \",\\ '("II ,,\', \!\I,/\ ~"('\. J ";~~, , \ \ I -7t1~1:\ \ ',," ,I iP~ I ~ \ I ~I ~!:""';:. (-~;; i ~~~, l' {~I ~~:-;" _1'!j" ~~ -~~,~ :''J \",,:,;"'\" \ \ I \ \ \ \ \ , I ,;".,1 I",...> ,>>C' , , NORTH ~ '''''20 j,"v 50' " . i I ~~o~~ 15050 23rd Avenue North Plymouth,Minnesota55447 T763-746-1600 F763-746-1699 11110Indusma\CircleNW,SuileE ElkRiver,Minnesola55330 T763-241-0108 F763-241-8351 www.schoellmadson.com PROJECT ARDEN PLAZA REDEVELOPMENT SOUTHWEST QUADRANT COUNTY ROAD E I LEXINGTON AVE ARDEN HilLS, MN '""'"' ARDEN PLAZA, LLC 4255 WHITE BEAR PARKWAY, SUITE 1550 WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110 651.247.7007 CONSULTANTS REVISIONS . Nl2.o7 CltySubmillal 9-17-07 CllyComlll8nt8 IhOnlbycertlfylhatlhlllplan.opeclllcidlon, Dr report was prepared by me Dr under my dlnlctsupEll'YlslDnandlhatlamaduly UceneedProfesslDnalEnglneerunder lhe laws ofth-e Slate ofMlnne&Ota.. DavldRoedeI DATE:_UC,NO.:_ CHECKED BY PDSlDR DESIGNED BY " DRAWN BY " PROJECT NO. DATE 64548.001 7.;JAfl TfTLESHEET TREE PRESERVATION PLAN SHEET NUMBER C1a ~ J \" i SITE DATA ZONING DISTRICL B-2 GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT ZONING REQUIREMENTS BUILDING SETBACKS FRONT REAR SIDE REQUIRED 5'" 2'" 20' PARKING SETBACKS FRONT REAR SIDE 20' 5' 5' LOT INFORMATION TOTAL PROPERTY AREA AREA IN ~IGHWAY EASEMENT NET AREA 546.120 Sf ' 12541 ACRES 65}e>e> SF. : 1.4'3bACRES 481,520 Sf ' 11"'51 ACRES EXISTING FLOOR AREA (EXISTING RETAIL PLUS EXiSTING OFFICE) PROPOSED FLOOR AREA (EXISTING RETAIL PLUS PROPOSED RETAIL! 106",52 Sf 91,600 Sf , , PROPOSED FLOOR AREA RATIO (MAX F A.R ALLOWED ' 0.8) 91,600 Sf. / 481,361 Sf. ' 0203 AREA cOvERED BY STRUCTURE (MAX. ALLOWED = 40 %) 91,600 Sf. 212>3 % AREA covERED BY LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPED AREA / NET AREA (MIN. REQUIRED, 25 '0) 121218 Sf. 121218 Sf. / 481,361 Sf. 252% PARKING EXISTING PARKING 13 HANDICAPPED STALLS 384 REGULAR STALLS EXISTING RETAIL SALES FLOOR AREA !BASED ON 80% OF TOTAL AREA) I STALL REQUIRED PER 150 Sf. 42,064 SF. 280 PROPOSED RETAIL SALES FLOOR AREA (BASED ON 80% OF TOTAL AREA) I STALL REQUIRED PER 150 Sf. 36,016 SF. 240 TOTAL STALLS REQUIRED 520 TOTAL STALLS PROViDED 408 ACCESSIBLE STALLS REQUIRED 8 ACCESSIBLE STALLS PROviDED 9 ~ 1l1l'!l'~)'I6'< COUNTY ROAD E ~,~ ~ NlY.l'~I16'E 5S' .3<0: )loojA'\6'. I '.' "",i,:: ""'i" i" T ,'T r~ I U",;al.,.lJ~S~~ ~p~ ~ ~~1fmf OO~~~ oowm V' , *- ll";.' ,,~- " ~ ,0 =Ui PROPOSED BUILDING ~A. ~~ ~; -" - -i_'~~_" RETAIL , -:!;C~2- J....J/. 14,490S.F ~ ----i':~-.!_ ;!~ FltlISHEDFLOORELEVATfQN=939.5G .~!l/ ~,_~~ ;' -~,-. ,-,' - ", ~liT;i;'~') w. ;:.. vt' tb-;~ ."~"U ~ II 'ifitilllf II '~iffirlI11~: ~~; ;1 I, P : ',.:', _...."... I 1 f-J7 1~,..:,;,.;.I_;)T\7 il ~,:;;...,. '''':;:;;~oo'' n '''~'''W'OO''I''I I .' \', , ,,- -./ /Y. ,r~.J ," i~ ="; , III111 J,,~!~~:er ~ .,., .,,~...oo., '[.J I> I> ""=....ool.l I'.. ' = " 1-22 ?1WJBI):.-.J~ &ST,}ft::":~5',0' "'ST~~~_'''' I ~~ (~PAllKJN:1; ~""'ElU':':::: - 7,~,_r ~"-, ~""" 'j, ~i 5 TAll5.~"~5' "'~TAl~.""._.e>' IS NO~~}: PROPOS~~~~~DING.B.: li,n".:.'...'.'.' ~p~ t<EWFAFl<m 5/DSIIOLi<:1;:;:_. ~, ~ ""~r~~ :';'~:'0:: '" I. A~"W~~~:::'~OOi '1lPFU.NfEL-~i IIST~p~"0' ,S! l,;;::'" DlMPSTE,;,- Q II STI ==h 7-;' I ""::;~,~., I ,~ ~~~II" · E', ~ I "'4,,,..J 1"0 ~':,,':<_>l IT1 ~ 'I 1~:f~"I' ' : =',1 1.,L..t!1 TT.f( NSUP~ ?,;; ,.~~~~ 'J;;.:", I IISl-:i~;~"'" I :tl ...d~--... EXISTING BUILDING _'''1'01'1[ '00_ ,~ , .\. , ~SCll'C'EXISTN<; ~ TOF:l1PlACE ~t< E><I51.S~ _____ ~~, lil~ ~ "';! -- "- ~" "u : .\ == ..... - -.' A _ ^. siPlM<ll:.:. " /,.' "~-',, ~ ';~= 'C;, ~i= ,I~ -A".. "\^,A" ~ ....... . - . . " . ""," ,^ '.-':-r -. '- "--EXIST.ING-PO_~~:_;,- - . . .: A^ ^ " J ," ., ,," . ' Ne!l.~I'16'" " - - - " ~ ~i~j;;;;,,;. _ PI. _ , '_,'~ PROPOSED BUILDING"C ~_ _ -' ~ OFFICE/RETAIL "' ), 14.300 S.F. ._ (t:;I~-'- - FlNISHEDFLOORElEVATlON.9W......,:_ '61'.,,- . U.,..e>' .~:::::: // " " ,..,,' ........... . .,. "- le>'e<lIU)I"" i(~- ., - --"J ~o ---"'----'~TER .~- "'--EXl5'1r<:; ~ . . -- 6STAllSOW.t<<'.0' ~,- ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN 1 "=1 00'-0" 200' o 'oJ- 50' 100' NOR 'H W :J Z W :;( Z o 1- e> z X w --' Ex1&T. !<ETAIKN:; - ~ I , = POPE ASSOCIATES INC. 1255 ENERGY PARK DRIVE ST. PAUL, MN 55108-5118 PH. (651) 642.9200 FAX (651) 642-1101 <>~ D~NNn~ '-/'"<::) properties ARDEN PLAZA ARDEN HillS, MN CITY SUBMITTAL ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN Issues and R~v i s ions: CITY SUBM ITT AL CITY SUBMITTAL 01SCUSS10N ONLY CITY SUBMITTAL 07/02107 08/20/07 08/27/07 09/17/07 r.. i. 1'0;< [it.l!>. I~I COOl1Iissionfro. OriIWnbl Cneded bl 16226.07012 TS.KH RP SHEET A1.l J 12 \, POPE ASSOCIATES INC. 1255 ENERGY PARK DRIVE ST. PAUL, MN 55108.5118 PH. (651) 642-9200 FAX (651} 642-1101 PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ARDEN PLAZA ARDEN HILLS, MN CITY SUBMITTAL PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN Issues ond R€yisions: CITY SUBMITTAL CITY SUBMITTAL DISCUSSION ONLY CITY SUBMITTAL 07/02107 08/20/07 08/27/07 09/17/07 o 20' .- -$ - 80' NORTH J:>>/ / _ ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN 1 "=40'-0" ktt/oj< li',II>,lJ01I COIITlIissionNo. Drow~ DY Checkedhv 16226-07012 TS.KH RP 40' SHEET A1.2 PROJECT Arden Plaza - Arden Hills, MN '. ',' , 09-17-07 I COMMISSION #16226-7012 <>~<:/ [Q)~~~D@ 00'0 properties . "1": I fDl U J 1 BUILDING 'A' SIGNAGE 16 A3.4 BUILDING "A" NE ELEVATION o 16' 32' ~- - 15 A3.4 BUILDING "A" WEST ELEVATION o 16' 32' 64' 1./"_ 1. A3.4 BUILDING "A" SOUTH ELEVATION o 16' 32' 64' 1..1""- ' IT _::0. .....- "" ... ... r 13 BUILDING "A" NORTH ELEVATION A3.4 0 ". " ". I..r"_ .. J - -::TI ... ... 12 BUILDING "A" EAST ELEVATION A3.4 0 ,,' ,,' ". 10.""_ .. WALL MOUNTED SIGNS ~5k:;NAF; 5~AREA.33,I!>&I' Tllkilnill'AAMA fl..6blS!7) --:r--""", 6IGNAREA'11hl5F ~ ~H('~'oI ;~~A"tb5f (1)<./31&1') ~ ~HAH.~I1A(;yl ~:~Ad'J!7 rl)<,J815f1 EASTWAll' --, lLEiHlMll. 5CI.lTl-lWALl TOTALWALL51<'>'l&~O l>,B!>&I' &lJl5&1' 'Il.bl5f' ..~ WINDOW SIGNS .--, {O 5l::;NA5 5IGNAREA.IZ>J5f (4)(,-40.451') EASTIVALL. 10151' TmAlIII!>J\")()'J~Y_F'ROP05m NOR111IUALl. 111')1&1' GRAP~ICS ~ {K~jl~.o,,,~ TmA'''.,J2AP>lIr.~~D ~EA&rWAl.l' lSJSF AUXILlAR, SIGNS r----1 {~~A'b"5F NOFlfl-lIUALL. "'''SF 5aJIJ.lUlAU 6.f>.;F TmAlAllXUIA"""~PROf'05Eo r----1 (I EXIT I ;~~~A.b1'J&I' L ~ 10 BUILDING "B" EAST ELEVATION 3.4 ". .. BUILDING 'B" SIGNAGE 11 A3.4 BUILDING "B" SOUTH ELEVATION o 16' 32' 64' U"'"_ . o 16' l.r_ ". I!I 9 A3.4 BUILDING "B" NORTH ELEVATION o 16' 32' 64' 1..1""- ~~ I BUILDING "B" WEST ELEVATION 8 A3.4 o 16' r..r-_ ". WALL MOUNTED SIGNS tEl SIa<lAl1EA.4b,S5l' (3)(,1-<0.151'1 it 516NSl 5IGNA~.22_l5l' 11X.4;_.SF) TmAlmAl!~tt'_~ EAST WAlL <I6,o:ISF NORTl-lWALL. "'~51' u.EST WAlL , b~SF 5C\l1J.l~ II')JlJ5f' ". .. ". .. BUILDING 'C' SIGNAGE I" 7 A3.4 l BUILDING "C" WEST ELEVATION o 16' 32" IJ"_ 6 A3.4 U BUILDING "C" SOUTH ELEVATION o 16' 32" 64' IJ"_ rr- -1] 5 A3.4 BUILDING "C" EAST ELEVATION o 16' J2' 64' U""_ ' - . AJ.4 o 16" IJ"_ ". WALL MOUNTED SIGNS ii S~C,I 6I6NA~.oI05f' '''X.'''''SF) TOTALWALLSI:i>l5~n U6TWALL W$5F ~!~WALl W~5F lIESTWALL fi)/l;5F SOJ"f1.IWALl, 01';51' ". .. ... .. ..~ g A3.4 1 A3.4 MONUMENT SIGNS 1:1)'.,,' ,. A<El'AeRlCATEDMOTAL fI..A/;I.ll>GTOMATCIl 6UILDlfO::o ARDEN PLAZA NTEI<NAl-LYIWMt<ATEP S~(_el-) ~ e lENANT NAME TENANT NAME TENANT NAME TENANT NAME TENANT NAME TENANT NAME FACE6Rlrx'lTOMATCll SUILDlNG . ..b 5/1OOIJ.lfACtCASrSTCt/E' rOMATOl6lJllON::;, . . RCO<FACE0"U10MATOI ElIJILDIN::> GRADE 3'-el' \Z>'-0' 3'-11>' _____ CONCF<l':TI' aoo:: I L-, ,---J -- I Fa.M~ATI~ C::::=..J=====L=::::J 3 A3.4 MONUMENT SIGN "C" ALONG LEXINGTON AVE. o 2' 4' U""_ s',a' . ~ S . . . . FREfABRICATEDMETAL FLA5I<INI:>TO I'tATC>I 6.lILDII-G HA>lJALC~EABLECOPT 113.15FJ S100nl FACE CAST STCNE tOMAll:;HBUI'-PN:> MERNALLYlllJ.l'1INATED &>:.N (,0 SFl , s . . FACEElRICK"1'OMATOl 6UILDIN:> ROCK FACE 0"l.I TOl"lAlOI 1llJ11D1NI:> ~" T.f" 5'.5' l'-0" ,-1 L, I ~ =,::.:"= L-..J==C:=..J MONUMENT SIGN "B" (AT THE INTERSECTION OF COUNTY ROAD E AND LEXINGTON AVENUE) r , ,. ,. ,. U""_ , ltl'.IlI' PRl:FABRlCAIEDMETAl FLASl-lN::i.TOMATOI ,. 6llILOlNG ARDEN PLAZA NTEJ<!.IAI.LYILLt.NII'lA1ED 54GNIIZ>05FJ TENANT NAME TENANT NAME SMOOTH FACE CAST SiCNE T011ATCI-IBLlILDING TENANT NAME . TENANT NAME FACEBRICK'1TOH.ATC!" TENANT NAME a1ILDI>.I:> TENANT NAME ROC;lC;FAC~ 0't.I TO HATC!" 6UILD1!6 O~ 3'-'" l:!>'-". 3'.'" S: l? o , CDNCIO'ETE5Loc:J<: L_L,_____.--1~FCt.tlDATI(;t.J C__..J____~L__J MONUMENT SIGN "A" ALONG COUNTY ROAD E o 2' 4' 8' U""_ POPEAsSOCIAT~S INC. lZ5, ENERGV PARK DRIVE ST. PAUl, MN55108'5118 PH.(65n~4-2.noo FAXI~5!)~42-<IO' 0"",,<9 [Q)~lNJi~ 00 pcop<><'- ARDEN PLAZA ARDEN HILLS. MN " .. CITY SUBMITTAL SIGNAGE I,,,,,~l~;,;..., CITYSUBMrTTAl CITYSUBMmAl CITYSUBMmAl CITYSUBMfHAl 07102107 08'20107 08127107 09117107 Ib",11W1i1llbiiIUilpllll,!l'<<ilitllill,OI ;~i~~P~T1~I':~Io~i~ftl hthilltl1DUlrrIIlrI...l l,l"IU'WlOII. ....1."'" li'.II,-UIIII CcIoi~;".. ~'" l, DrclollJ 16226--07012 KHTS "' SHEET A3.4 ~ Attachment 3 C- 2 Traffic and Parking Safety Study ~ ~HILLS October 3, 2007, Planning Commission Meeting Memorandum 1800 Pioneer Creek Center, Maple Plain, MN 55359 Phone: 763-479-4200 Fax: 763-479-4242 C'C~,~~Wenck To: Dennis Trooien, Dennis Properties Jim Ben~~ and Aravind GotlemuA~a From: Date: September 17, 2007 Subject: Traffic and Parking Study for Proposed Redevelopment of Arden Plaza PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND The purpose of this memorandum is to present the results of our traffic study for the proposed redevelopment of Arden Plaza in the City of Arden Hills. This memorandum represents an update and replaces our previous two memorandums, both dated June 29. This update is to account for comments raised by City and County staff and at the Planning Commission meeting on August]. This traffic study addressed the following principal traffic questions: a) To what extent would the proposed redevelopment alter the total vehicle trips entering and exiting the site during the a.m. peak hour, p.m. peak hour, and on a daily basis? b) Would satisfactory traffic operations be provided at the County Road E/site access, County Road ElLexington A venue, and Lexington A venue/site access intersections upon completion of the proposed development? If the answer is no, what mitigation measures are needed to provide satisfactory operations? c) Would safe traffic operations be provided on County Road E and Lexington Avenue along the frontage of the subject site and at the intersection of those two roadways? d) Would the current site plan provide satisfactory traffic and parking operations within the site? This question focused on examination of the following four principal points: . Overall adequacy of proposed parking supply . Relatively high parking demand at the south end of the site . Head-in parking along the east edge of the existing retail building . Drive-through queuing for the proposed pharmacy The subject site is located in the southwest quadrant of the County Road ElLexington A venue intersection. The site presently consists of the following uses: . Three interconnected office buildings with a total gross floor area of 45,954 SF (square feet) of which 29,429 SF presently is occupied and the remaining ]6,515 SF is vacant. T'\19JI\OI\M"'1l1()-Upd~{".d9.17.07_d()c Memorandum to Dennis Trooien, Dennis Properties Subject: Traffic and Parking Study for Proposed Redevelopment of Arden Plaza Page 2 of 15 September 17, 2007 . Retail building with a total gross floor area of approximately 55,500 SF of which 52,500 SF presently is occupied and the remaining 3,000 SF is vacant. The proposed redevelopment plan will retain the existing retail building and will replace the three office buildings with the following uses as shown in Figure]: . 14,386 SF pharmacy with drive-through . ] 6,230 SF supermarket . 14,300 SF retail or office I The proposed redevelopment will not alter the existing access arrangements for the site, which include one driveway on County Road E and one driveway on Lexington A venue. The proposed redevelopment is expected to be complete by 2008. 1 To be conservative in trip generation and traffic volume estimates, we assumed retail for traffic forecasting purposes. ", cc.- .'."""'~~_..'~ I ( I -- -. -;~~~~\:1 ' "'U' '~~_f\ ' 'j<~a\':'~:Y' -- '^j ,.=" ~ ".;0-,0 '1 " -. I 'I .l~ ': Ii ::::-_~.. PROPOSED BUILDING "A" w~ J8L 'i'il- 'I :1'""", RETAIL .. - .;~ ~I~ Z 1 i!:f j. I" -il: ,-"~~.~_..: il;.~:b. .,::; IL"'''''"G'""'''''i-J ~-;;~~IJ ':<:._~~.', .......~,'.. "t'i,.{\:..T:" I'~: - i +- . --'' u,~~""'" ,~.-~ I ", :L ~ -- ~;:'~ - I &:J ~ ! I - !~"UfliI H 5 fU- - '- L. 4.. .J,,,,,,,_.. ,.,:.;,jf' '''~';':;';'~''., ~ @... !~'."....,-I..'''..''I;1;,~,';::<.-' '.~m'~ mr"'..il!: - it ~ 1 -'- -~C'.::;:--> {J.' ,.. ....1: i.i-+ 1~."lnfll!.1 x, I I __.~/I . , ' . '" - . ~<~;... _ .i,"" _ ,_I I _ ,I ~' , ;~I rt;l~~=c=~=r '\1 i'\ Ff""'. ,:"""'7'~;';';..f''''''--'~t\;i-JB-~'' '-"::;~;;"'~Mi ,I,.....~i]'l ~!o ,""'.\j-,, . if: .' I II 1 I iT"' .;~ ,---,-,,~., .,.. ''''it..... 1 / ,..1" ",' ;1..1! . -... ...~,;;'!"',.c~. }/ 1\0, 'L t. ...0.......,_..__ t.~..,,~.~; "Ft.U:~~;;c;l: 1 ~.- ___ ~~~F...,$_'~.~.~.,~...........i....!....~ : '01 ...~, ij-_.C>,:;;:;"~'~7 ' .. ." 1 r I rl: 1 ..'1'.1 /~':::3:2~~7",,'. I too. L.-J~.,,,,.!_..!.!.-'..!O~_~,,..___.. 7._ .:}.. ,',\: I ~' ~,=o.q,g --1 /-_.... 1\.....: "~~";6~r~:.,~,.~ f i \ i'l<~r'."~' .',\ ~,"~~ j n" 'PROPOSEOBUILOING'C' EXISllNGPONO'1 1-1 .. ~I OFJ;=AIL J ~~./ l""...lEfl.."""',.."ATal....m ~ I' : U.,~j -' - ~c - '/J I I Jill:: '-~~ ~ I J \ -- - - --~---- --"*.=:..-~--- --- COUNTY ROAD E ....."'" ~ r ~~".,..,,~ /'C"""~"""" :~fl !g 1-' N t APPROXIMATE SCALE 1 120' o ;;;,~Wenck TRAFFIC STUDY FOR PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT OF ARDEN PLAZA FIGURE 1 CURRENT DEVELOPMENT PLAN Memorandum to Dennis Trooien, Dennis Properties Subject: Traffic and Parking Study for Proposed Redevelopment of Arden Plaza Page 4 of 15 September 17. 2007 RESPONSES TO TRAFFIC QUESTIONS Changes in Trip Generation due to Proposed Redevelopment (Question a) To determine how the proposed redevelopment would affect the total trip generation for the site during the a.m. peak hour, p.m. peak hour, and on a daily basis, the following approach was used: I) We completed traffic counts at the driveway intersections on County Road E and Lexington Avenue on a typical weekday during the p.m. peak period. Using those traffic counts, we determined the existing total p.m. peak hour trip generation for the site. 2) Since the proposed redevelopment involves removal of the existing office buildings, it is important to divide the total trip generation for the site between retail and office. To determine what portion of the existing trip generation is due to the office and what portion is due to retail, we developed trip generation estimates for the existing uses based on data presented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation, Seventh Edition. Based on the relationship between the estimated office and retail trips, we divided the existing trip generation for the site between retail and office. 3) As described earlier, there presently is some vacant space both in the office and retail buildings. To determine the true change in trip generation for the site due to the proposed redevelopment, it is important to calculate the total trip generation for the site with existing uses fully occupied. Thus, the existing retail and office trips from step 2 were increased by a ratio of total square feet to occupied square feet. The resultant trip generation from this step is the total trip generation for the site with full occupancy of the existing uses. 4) Trip generation for the proposed new retail uses was estimated based on data presented in ITE Trip Generation, Seventh Edition. 5) We removed trips due to the existing office buildings from the total trip generation for the site with full occupancy of existing uses. We then added trip generation for the new retail uses from step 4 to determine total trip generation for the site upon completion of the proposed redevelopment. 6) Trip generation for the a.m. peak hour and on a daily basis was estimated using the p.m. peak hour counts and based on the relationship between p.m. peak hour and a.m. peak hour and daily trip generation as per ITE data. Table I shows a comparison of the trip generation for existing uses with full occupancy and upon completion of the proposed redevelopment. As indicated in Table 1, the proposed Memorandum to Dennis Trooien, Dennis Properties Subject: Traffic and Parking Study for Proposed Redevelopment of Arden Plaza Page 5 of 15 September 17,2007 redevelopment will not significantly alter the trip generation for the site during the a.m. peak hour. During the p.m. peak hour and on a daily basis, the proposed redevelopment will increase the trip generation for the site by about 50 percent. Table 1 Weekday Trip Generation for Arden Plaza A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Daily Scenario In Out Total In Ont Total Total Existing uses with full occupancy ]57 53 210 203 262 465 4,900 With proposed redevelopment ]22 82 204 358 347 705 7,600 Traffic Operations at Subiect Intersections (question b) To determine the extent to which the proposed redevelopment would alter the traffic operations at the two driveway intersections, we completed the following steps: I) Base traffic counts. As described earlier, we completed existing (2007) traffic counts at the two driveway intersections and at the Lexington A venue/County Road E intersection during the p.m. peak period on a typical weekday. Our traffic counts were adjusted to account for full occupancy of the existing uses as discussed previously. These adjusted 2007 counts form the basis for our traffic forecasts and analyses for the post- redevelopment condition. 2) Analysis year and background growth. Consistent with normal practice, we completed traffic forecasts and analyses for the year after expected full completion of the proposed redevelopment, which is 2009. Based on comments raised by County staff, a 1.5 percent per year background growth rate was applied to existing through volumes on County Road E and Lexington A venue to establish 2009 no-build volumes. 3) 2009 post-redevelopment forecasts. Traffic volumes due to the existing office buildings were first removed from the 2009 no-build volumes at the subject intersections. Trip generation presented in Table 1 for the proposed redevelopment represents gross trips. Due to the multi-use nature of the subject development, we expect that a portion of the trips generated by the various uses will occur internal to the site. To account for these internal trips, we reduced the gross trip generation for the proposed new retail uses by five percent to arrive at net trips. These net trips due to the proposed three new retail buildings were assigned to the two driveways based on expected directional distribution and location of each new building relative to the driveways. The following are our Memorandum to Dennis Trooien, Dennis Properties Subject: Traffic and Parking Stndy for Proposed Redevelopment of Arden Plaza Page 6 of 15 September 17, 2007 directional distribution percentages, which are based on the existing traffic patterns for Arden Plaza: . 30 percent to/from the north on Lexington A venue . 30 percent to/from the south on Lexington A venue . 25 percent to/from the west on County Road E . 15 percent to/from the east on County Road E Development volumes were then added to the 2009 no-bnild volumes to arrive at 2009 build volumes. Figure] shows traffic volumes for the two driveway intersections for the following scenarios: existing (2007), 2007 with full occupancy of existing uses, 2009 no- build, and 2009 build. 4) Traffic Analyses. Capacity analyses were completed at the subject intersections for all four of the above scenarios using the Synchro 7 analysis software. Existing geometrics and traffic control were used in the analysis for all three scenarios. The driveway intersection on County Road E presently provides one left turn lane, one through lane, and one shared through/right turn lane on the east and west approaches. The north approach provides one lane for all movements. The south approach provides one shared through/left turn lane, and a short right turn lane, which provides an effective storage length of about 50 feet. The driveway intersection on Lexington A venue is aT intersection that presently provides one through lane and one shared through/right turn lane on the north approach and one through lane and one left turn lane on the south approach. The west approach, which serves the Arden Plaza development, provides one left turn lane and a short right turn lane, which is about 50 feet long. The County Road E/Lexington A venue intersection is controlled by a traffic signal and provides one left turn lane, one through lane, and one shared through/right turn lane on all four approaches. Capacity analysis results are presented in terms of level of service (LOS), which ranges from A to F. LOS A represents the best intersection operation, with very little delay for each vehicle using the intersection. LOS F represents the worst intersection operation with excessive delay. LOS results for the subject intersections are presented in Figure 3 and are discussed in detail next. Synchro worksheets showing delay values and other key outputs are presented in the appendix. . County Road E/Lexington Avenue. As presented in Figure 3, this intersection presently operates at LOS E and will operate at LOS Fin 2009 without the proposed development. The proposed development will increase the overall intersection volume by only 2.7 percent and the overall delay for the intersection by only about 12 seconds. The LOS F operation at this intersection will occur regardless of the proposed development. Based on further analyses, we determined that LOS D or better could be provided at the subject intersection for Memorandum to Dennis Trooien, Dennis Properties Subject: Traffic and Parking Study for Proposed Redevelopment of Arden Plaza Page 7 of 15 September 17, 2007 all four scenarios if the following two measures were implemented: a) increase green time for eastbound left turns by reducing green time for the westbound through movements, without changing the cycle length or any other signal coordination parameters, and b) provide protected/permissive phasing for all left turn movements at the intersection. It is important to note that the need for these mitigation measures already exists and the proposed development will not significantly alter that need. . County Road E/site access. Motorists exiting the Arden Plaza development via the driveway on County Road E presently experience LOS F. Exiting movements will continue to experience LOS F at both driveways upon completion of the proposed redevelopment. Delay values for all movements under all scenarios are presented in the Synchro worksheets, which are included in the appendix. The capacity analyses revealed two principal reasons for the LOS F operation at this intersection: a) insufficient gaps on the mainline due to high through traffic volumes on County Road E and b) short storage for exiting right turns. No feasible mitigation measures are available for the driveway intersections that would improve the availability of gaps on the mainline for exiting motorists. However, the storage lengths for right turns can be lengthened. Based on the results of the capacity analyses, we recommend that the storage length for exiting right turns on the driveway on County Road E be extended to the south edge of the retail building A (pharmacy), which will provide a total storage length of about] 90 feel. This change will significantly reduce the average delay for exiting movements. To make it easy to understand for exiting motorists and thereby, provide efficient operations, we recommend that a stop sign and a lane assignment sign be provided on the driveway approach to County Road E. The signing should be installed per standards presented in the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. . Lexington A venue/site access. Motorists exiting the Arden Plaza development via the driveway on Lexington A venue presently experience LOS F. Exiting movements will continue to experience LOS F at both driveways upon completion of the proposed redevelopment. Delay values for all movements under all scenarios are presented in the Synchro worksheets, which are included in the appendix_ The capacity analyses revealed two principal reasons for the LOS F operation at this intersection: a) insufficient gaps on the mainline due to high through traffic volumes on Lexington A venue and b) short storage for exiting right turns. No feasible mitigation measures are available for the driveway intersections that would improve the availability of gaps on the mainline for exiting motorists. However, the storage lengths for right turns can be lengthened. Memorandum to Dennis Trooien, Dennis Properties Subject: Traffic and Parking Study for Proposed Redevelopment of Arden Plaza Page 8 of]5 September 17, 2007 Based on the results of the capacity analyses, we recommend that the storage length for exiting right turns on the driveway on Lexington A venue be extended to the first circulation aisle within the site, which will provide a total storage length of about 225 feet, measured from the east property line. This change will significantly reduce the average delay for exiting movements. To make it easy to understand for exiting motorists and, thereby, provide efficient operations, we recommend that a stop sign and a lane assignment sign be provided on the driveway approach to Lexington Avenue. The signing should be installed per standards presented in the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. w "''''''' ~ "'0'" "''''~ z t:::<o<o g "'....'" ~t::::!:: '" ...."'~ "'0'" z "'"'''' --- 1il f?t:::!:: "'0'" (;;005 ",o~ .... "'"'''' (;)005 "'....~ COUNTY ROAD E Jll Jll COUNTY ROAD E 5/5/5/5~ L 29/29/29/29 403/411/423/442 ~ L 134/134/138/138 <C-- 651/651/672/672 <C--276/27n285~94 977/977/1009/1009 ~ r 28/31/31/58 49~497ffi1~522~ r 107/109/1W125 51/56/56/91 ~ 150/150/155/155 ~ '< lir lir ~ "'~~ 00.... t:::;::~ ~~fa > ;n22'J Otot:: ii -~.... ~"'", ~ - 0 "' '" !::@t:: w '" !::: ...."'0 t- .,. ;;; ~;,z;r-- u; r::::;:: 0.,. ~'" ;:: ~~ '0:.... ;:l;l<! -'" "'.,. "'''' Jl 44/52/5~58 ~ 7~86/86/105 ~ SITE DRIVEWAY Ii ....'" w "'''' N ~ C'J2? "'''' z -", t g "'", ~~ '" .,.~ z !!'! X '" w ;;; .... NOT TO SCALE ~ EXISTING COUNTS (2007) ~ 2007 WITH FULL OCCUPANCY OF EXISTING USES rr= 2009 NO-BUILD I 2009 BUILD WITH PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT XXlXXIXXfXX TRAFFIC STUDY FOR FIGURE 2 v..' PROPOSED :~Wenck WEEKDAY REDEVELOPMENT P.M. PEAK HOUR OF ARDEN PLAZA TRAFFIC VOLUMES w ~ z ~ LLILlL (9 WWW WWW z UJUlUJ Ul-- x ~~~ ww w www .... OOW COUNTY ROAD E J!L J!L COUNTY ROAD E AfAfAfA-1 L AfAfAfA F/F/F/F -1 . L CIClC/C AfAfAfA --l> ~ AfAfAfA D/D/D/D --l> ~ C/C/C/C AfAfAfA ~ r B/B/B/B D/D/D/D~ r E1E1E1E ~ lir lir ~ LLLLLL WOO U:U:::U:: WOO > u:u:u: WOU ii" 0 u:u:Li:: WOO w J- in ~~ u J! F/F/F/F -1 F/F/F/F~ SITE DRIVEWAY li w ~~ N ~ ~~ z t ~ (9 z X w .... NOT TO SCALE EXISTING COUNTS (2007) II 2007 WITH FULL OCCUPANCY OF EXISTING USES rr= 2009 NO-BUILD I 2009 BUILD WITH PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT XXlXXJX:XfXX TRAFFIC STUDY FOR FIGURE 3 ;;;...Wenck PROPOSED WEEKDAY REDEVELOPMENT P.M. PEAK HOUR OF ARDEN PLAZA LEVELS OF SERVICE Memorandum to Dennis Trooien, Dennis Properties Subject: Traffic and Parking Study for Proposed Redevelopment of Arden Plaza Page 11 of 15 September 17, 2007 Traffic Safetv on Countv Road E, Lexington Avenue, and at Countv Road E/Lexington Avenue Intersection (question c) To examine traffic safety, we obtained crash data from the Minnesota Department of Transportation for County Road E and Lexington A venue along the frontage of the subject site and at the County Road E/Lexington A venue intersection for the past five years (2002 to 2006). Based on these crash data, there was only one reported crash (possible injury) at the site access on Lexington Avenue. No crashes were reported at the site access on County Road E. There were a total of 74 reported crashes at the County Road E/Lexington A venue intersection. Since the proposed development will increase the traffic volume at the County Road E/Lexington A venue intersection by only 2.7 percent. the crash frequency at this intersection is not expected to change significantly. A total of two "segment" crashes were reported on Lexington Avenue between County Road E and the site access. Since the proposed development will not significantly alter the traffic volumes, no significant changes are expected in crash frequency on that segment of Lexington A venue. One concern that was raised at the Planning Commission meeting on August 1 was regarding the safety impacts of "weaving" maneuvers due to motorists exiting at the access on County Road E to turn right on to County Road E and then change lanes to turn left on to Lexington Avenue. Based on our review, these maneuvers are not expected to cause any negative safety impacts on County Road E for the following reasons: . Those maneuvers are not truly weaving maneuvers becanse motorists exiting the site will turn only when there is a gap in eastbound through traffic. . The crash data shows no reported "segment" crashes in the past five years on County Road E between the site access and Lexington A venue. Adequacv of Internal Traffic and Parking Operations (question d) We reviewed the adequacy of the current site plan with respect to the following three items: . Overall adequacy of proposed parking supply . Relatively high parking demand at the south end of the site . Head-in parking along the east edge of the existing retail building . Drive-through queuing for the proposed pharmacy Results of our review regarding each of the above four items are presented next: . Overall adequacy of proposed parking supply. Our parking review was based on the City's Zoning Code requirements and data presented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers' Parking Generation, Third Edition. Results of our review are presented next. Memorandum 10 Dennis Trooien, Dennis Properties Subject: Traffic and Parking Study for Proposed Redevelopment of Arden Plaza Page 12 of 15 September 17.2007 o The Zoning Code presents a parking requirement for "retail sales," which applies to all ofthe proposed and existing retail uses. The Code requires one space for each ] 50 SF of gross retail sales floor space. From information provided to us, the total estimated retail sales floor area is 78,052 SF. For this area, the total number of spaces required on the site as perthe zoning code is 52] (78,052 divided by 150). The Zoning Code states that "the number of spaces required for a specific use may be reduced if the owner or occupant provides documentation that a lesser number of spaces will actually be needed than normally required by this Code and the City Council authorizes such lesser number after recommendation by the Planning Commission." Parking demand calculations based on current industry standards are presented next. o The ITE Parking Generation, 2004 presents parking data collected at numerous developments throughout the United States. These data present separate peak period demand data for pharmacy, supermarket, and general retail uses. Table 2 shows parking demand calculations for the proposed redevelopment based on lTE data. Table 2 Parking Demand Calculations Based on ITE Parking Generation, Third Edition Use Size Average Peak Period Parking Demand (Salnrday') (floor area) Rate Number of Spaces Existino retail 55,500 SF 2.97 snaces ner 1.000 SF ]65 Phannacv 14,386 SF 2.] soaces oer ] ,000 SF 31 Supennarket 16.230 SF 4.75 soaces per 1,000 SF 78 Retail J 4.300 SF 2.97 spaces per 1,000 SF 43 TOTAL 317 From Table I, the total estimated peak period demand for the site as a whole is 317 parking spaces. The Eno Foundation's Parking document indicates that the actual supply of parking should be 10 percent greater than the estimated demand. Such additional supply will provide reserve capacity to allow for cruising vehicles in search of a space, for snow storage and for other factors that cause inefficiencies. With the 10 percent factor, the total parking supply needed is 349 spaces (317 multiplied by 1.I). Based on the parking review and the calculations presented in this memorandum, the minimum number of parking spaces that should be provided on the site upon completion of the proposed redevelopment is 349 spaces. The current site plan 2 For all uses on the site upon completion of the proposed redevelopment, peak period parking demand on a Saturday is greater than peak demand on a lypical weekday. Memorandum to Dennis Trooien, Dennis Properties Subject: Traffic and Parking Study for Proposed Redevelopment of Arden Plaza Page 13 of 15 September 17,2007 shows a total of 408 parking spaces. Thus, the current site plan will provide adequate parking supply to meet the projected demand upon completion of the proposed redevelopment. . Relatively high parking demand near south end of site. We understand from comments raised at the Planning Commission meeting on August] that parking demand near the south end of the site is greater than elsewhere on the site. To determine whether the current site plan would provide adequate parking supply in this area, we reviewed the proposed supply and projected demand south of the driveway on Lexington A venue. As per the current site plan presented in Figure], the total parking supply in that area is 86 spaces. For uses in the existing retail building that are south of the driveway on Lexington A venue and assuming] 00 percent retail for the proposed building C, the total parking demand in this area is ]47 spaces. Thus, for the area south of the driveway on Lexington A venue, the parking demand would be 6] spaces greater than the proposed supply. This shortage in parking supply is addressed as follows: o The developer presently is revising the site plan to accommodate the] 4,300 square feet for building C in a two-story building. This is different from the plan shown in Figure], which shows a one-story building. This change will reduce the footprint for this building and, thereby, provide more space for parking. Specifically, this change will increase the parking supply in the south area by about 37 spaces, to ] 23 spaces. o As indicated earlier, we assumed 100 percent retail for building C to be conservative in our traffic and parking projections. Based on recent discussions with the Developer, we understand that only 50 percent of building C will be retail and the remaining 50 percent will be office space. The peak demand for retail uses typically occurs in the evenings and on weekends when the parking demand for office is virtually zero. With 50 percent office, the peak demand for the area south of the driveway on Lexington A venue will only be 126 spaces. With greater parking supply due to reduced footprint for building C, the total number of spaces in the area south of the driveway on Lexington A venue will be ] 23. With 50 percent of building C being retail, the total demand in that area will be ] 26 spaces. Thus, it is expected that the current site plan with the changes to building C will provide adequate parking supply near the south end of the site upon completion of the proposed development. . Head-in parking along east edge of existing retail building. As shown in Figure], the current site plan includes head-in parking along the east edge of the existing retail building. Based on our review, we believe that the head-in parking will provide satisfactory operations within the site for the following reasons: o Reduces number of pedestrians that have to cross the drive aisle in front of the building. o Safer for handicap motorists as they do not have to cross the drive aisle. Memorandum to Dennis Trooien, Dennis Properties Subject: Traffic and Parking Study for Proposed Redevelopment of Arden Plaza Page 14 of 15 September 17, 2007 o Better alignment of the drive aisle with the driveway on County Road E. o Head-in parking is not uncommon for similar neighborhood retail centers. . Drive-through queuing for proposed phannacy. The current site plan shows a stacking distance of approximately 80 feet for drive-through queuing. This stacking distance can accommodate a total of four vehicles in the drive-through queue. To determine if this space is sufficient to accommodate the expected drive-through queuing for the pharmacy, we obtained data collected at six other pharmacies (all WaJgreens stores) in the Twin Cities Metropolitan area. All of those six pharmacies have two drive-through windows, whereas the proposed pharmacy will only have one drive-through window. At one of the six pharmacies, the maximum drive-through queue was one vehicle. At two of the pharmacies, the maximum queue was two vehicles. At the remaining three pharmacies, the maximum queue was three vehicles. Since the proposed pharmacy will provide space for four vehicles, we are confident that the drive-through queuing for the pharmacy will adequately be accommodated. The current site plan provides 90-degree parking with two-way circulation just west of the pharmacy drive-through. This arrangement creates a northbound lane "sandwiched" between two southbound lanes - one for the pharmacy drive-through and the other for the parking aisle. This arrangement will result in motorist confusion and serious safety conflicts in this location. To mitigate this problem, we recommend that the 90-degree parking be converted to angle parking with one-way circulation in the southbound direction. Memorandum to Dennis Trooien, Dennis Properties Subject: Traffic and Parking Study for Proposed Redevelopment of Arden Plaza Page ]5 of]5 September 17,2007 APPENDIX - SYNCHRO WORKSHEETS Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: CR E & Lexington Ave 9/17/2007 .-" -I> ""t .f +- '- '\ t !'" '-. + ./ Lane Confi9urations Volume {vph} Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 t900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 200 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Frt Fl1 Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3415 0 1770 . 3366. Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3415 RightTurn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 40 40 Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) 8.1 8.6 9.7 5.9 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 O.ro . 0,90 0.90 0.90. ,0.90. 0.90 . 0.90' O.ro 0.90 0,90 .oi90 . .wwww ^ Adj. Flow (vph) 448 549 167 119 307 149 119 712 78 179 833 361 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 716 0 119 456 0 119 790 0 179 1t94 0 Turn Type Prot. Protected Phases 8 7 4 6 5 2 Permitted Phases Total Split (s) 20.0 0.0 17.0 34.9 0.0 10.0 38.1 0.0 12.0 40.1 0.0 Total Lost TIme (s) 4.0 4:0 Act Elfct Green (s) 16.0 27.9 10.7 22.6 15.4 36.9 Actuated glC Ratio 0.15 0.15 vie Ratio 1.66 0.76 0.66 0.58 0.62 0.72 0.69 0.97 Control Delay 343.1 62.7 '32.4 60.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 343.1 60.6 LOS F D E C E D E D Approach Delay Approach LOS F D D D Queue Length 50th (ft) -440 118 116 -432 Queue Length 95th (ft) #635 270 136 156 #213 #294 #568 Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) 200 100 180 150 BaSe Capacity (vph) 260 1233. Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SpilIback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced vie Ratio Area Type: Cycle Len9th: 105 Actuated.CycleLength: 105 Synchro 7 - Report T:\ 1931 \01lAu9ust 07 -Update\Synchro\Existing-2007.syn Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: CR E & Lexin9ton Ave Offset 0 Start of Green Maximum vie Ratio: 1.66 Intersection leu Level of Service E Utilization 86.4% - Volume exceeds infinite. # 95th percentile volume exceeds QueueshQI'in is ti''"''~'""'"^. f" i:" ~:- .. ... ,#~ !c:;'::':;;: s: ~ .':+" rT~ ~05. !0~-;::~:~7 _~, -08- 9/17/2007 " , "::~ T:I 1931 \01\August 07 -Update\SynchroIExisting-2007 .syn Synchro 7 - Report HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: CR E & N. Dvwy 9/17/2007 ./- - "). .f - '- "'\ t ~ \. ~ ..; Si9n Control Free Free Grade ()O!O Peak Hour Faclor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly flow rale (vph) 1086 57 31 Pedestrians lane Widlh (ft) Walking Speed (ftls) Percent Blockage .. Right lurn flare (veh) 2 Median type Median slorage veh) Upstream signal (it) pX, platoon unblocked 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 vC, conflicting volume 756 1142 1943 vC1. stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu. unblocked vol 640 1142 243 tC, single (5) 4.1 4.1 tC, 2 slage (s) tF (s) pO queue free % 99 95 40 98 85 100 100 eM capacity (veh/h) Volume T alaI Volume Left 6 31 0 0 48 10 Volume Right j) 0 68 3 cSH 894 607 1700 1700 188 122 Volume to Capacity , 0.01 Queue Length 951h (ft) 0 4 0 0 88 9 Control Delay (s) . 11.2 52.9 38.1 Lane LOS A B F E Approach Delay (s) fr.G 52.9 38.1' Approach LOS F E Intersection Capacity UtirlZalion' ICU leveJ:ofService . Analysis Period Synchro 7 - Report T:\ 1931 \01\Augusl 07 -Updale\Synchro\Existing-2007.syn HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: S Dvwy & Lexington Ave 911712007 --" "'t '" t + .; Volume (veh/h) Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% Peak Hour Fac10r 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly ftow rate (vph) 49 ", 80 53 903 1048 Pedestrians lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (JUs) Percent Blockage Righ11urn ftare Iveh) 2 Median type Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked 0.71 0.71 0.71 vC, conflicting volume 2091 557 1113 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conI vol vCu, unblocked vol 1718 0 340 tC, single (s) 6.8 6.9 4.1 tC. 2 stage (s) IF(s) pO queue free % 9 eM capacity (vehlhJ Volume Total 3 Volume Left 49 53 0 Volume Right 80 0 cSH 134 862 1700 Votume to Capacity 0.98 0.06 Queue Length 95th 1ft) 165 5 0 Control Delay (s) 130.5 g.4 Lane LOS F A Approach Delay (s) 130,5 0.5 0.0 Approach LOS F Utilization 52.8% Analysis Period (min) 15 T:I 1931\01\August 07 -UpdateISynchroIExisting-2007.syn Synchro 7 - Report Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: CR E & LexinQton Ave 9/17/2007 .-f -,. f+- '-,,\ t". ~~~~. Lane Configurations ~ tlo ~ tlo ~ tlo ~ tlo Volume (\ifJh) 4114971~0 109 277: 134 ,'fof "e646 , "'l~~ .161~.753 < '927 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 200 Storage Lanes 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.965 Fit Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Fit Permitted Satd. Flow{perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (f1) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic ("!o) Lane Group Flow (vph) Tilrn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Total Split (s) Total Lost Time (s) Act Effct Green (s) Actuated glC Ratio v/c Ralio Control 0.,181 Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approacl1 Delay Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (It) Base Capacity (vph) Starva1ion Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced vie Ratio '. ~ .; o o o o 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 100 0.95 0.95 0.950 1770 0.950 1770 0.950 0.950 0.950 3415 0.950 0.950 0.950 Yes Yes Yes Yes 39 40 475 8.1 0.90 552 40 40 5.9 0.90 ' 837 . 0.90 0:90 167 121 0.90 . 0.90' ',0.90'. 0.90 0.90 149 119 718 81 179 0.90 363 0.90 457 457 Prot 3 719 o 121 457 o 119 799 o 179 1200 o 8 4 7 6 5 2 20.0 4.0 16.0 0.15 1.69 357.2 0.0 357.2 F 0.0 9.0 39.1 0.0 11.0 41.1 5.2 36.3 0.35 0.99 55.8 0.0 55.8 E ~7A E 401 #561 0.0 4.0 27.9 11.0 0.10, 0.65 22.9 0.22 0.57 32.2. 0.0 14.1 0.13 0.76 67.7 0.0 67.7, E 0.77 39.3 0.0 39.3 D 162.9 F 220 275 395, 0.61 0.70 0.0 0.0 0.0 E C E C D D -452 #649 136 156 #224 312 200 270 o {) o 1.69 100 236 o 180 150 237' o 101,7 o 1216 o o o o o o o o o o o O.gg Cycle Length: 105 Actuated Cycle Length: 105 Synchro 7 - Report T:I 1931 101 \August 07 -Update\Synchro\Existing-2007 _w-full_occupancy.syn Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: CR E & Lexington Ave Offset: 0 9/17/2007 Maximum vie Ratio: 1.69 Intersection Utilization 87.0% leu level of Service E - Volume exceeds is # 95th volume exceeds ~~;::~ ~r~;:~ Synchro 7 - Report T:I 1931 101 \August 07 -UpdateISynchroIExisting-2007 _ w.full_ occupancy.syn HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: CR E & N. Dvwy ~eJflOOt~" ~~~illlIJl~~~~_L- <ill Lane Configura1ions ,t1> ,t1'+ <1 '(f Volume (vehlh) 5 977 56 31 29. 51 . .1 . 72 .' . . 9.. Sign Control Free Free Grade 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly flow rale (vph) 6 1086 723 Pedestrians Lane Width (fl) Walking Speed (IVs) Percent Blockage Right 1urn flare (veh) Median type Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol tC, single (s) fC, 2 stage (s) tF(s) pO queue free % cM capacity (vehlh) Volume Tofal Volume Left Volume Right cSH Volume to Capacity Queue Lengfh 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS 911712007 ..J- '- t \.. ~ .; - '" j'> "'). .f - ~E2 0.90 0.90 2 None 475 0.95 756 0.95 1562 0.95 1952 0.95 0.95 0.95 574 643 .4.1 1148 4.1 1489 1900 6.5 574 1281 19t5 246 2.2 99 27 98 83 89 100 6 o 893 .0.Q1 o 34 34 o 604 0.06 5 11.3 B 0.5 482 272 . '138 o 0 57 1700 0.28. o O.ll 1700 0,16: o 172 0.80 t34 A 0.0 F E 40.0 E F Average Delay Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period 5.6 46.6% 15 ICU Level of Service . Synchro 7 - Report T:I 1931 101IAugust 07.UpdafeISynchroIExisting-2007 _w.full_occupancy.syn HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: S Dvwy & Lexington Ave 911712007 .-1 l- '\ t + .I Sign Control !3fBde .. Peak Hour Factor l:tourlyflowrate ("Ph) Pedestrians l.ii[lll Width (fl) Walking Speed (ft/s) P~[c:enf Blockage Right turn flare (veh) MBdiantype Median storage veh) UpStream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked VC; conflicting volume vC 1, stage 1 coni vol ~C2i slage 2 coni vol vCu, unblocked vol lG;:single (s) tC, 2 stage (s) it:}s) >< pO queue free % <:Mpapacily (vehlh) 0.90 Volume Lefl Volome Right cSH Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) C""tiol Delay (s) Lane LOS Ilpproach Delay (s) Approach LOS Average Delay lntEirSec!ion Capacity Utilization Period (min) 14.4 52.8% 15 Synchro 7 - Report T:11931\01\Augusl 07 -UpdateISynchroIExisting-2007 _ w-full_occupancy.syn Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: CR E & Lexington Avenue 9/17/2007 ..1_. ...--\..",\ t r'.!-'; ~~~~~ ~~~ ,n ~n ~ n ,n Volume (liph) . ; 423 512 155' 112.285.138 110. 666 '.<15'166, .' Ti6 ,337 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 ~brage Lenglll (ft) 200 0 100 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Japer Lengll1(ft) 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 0:965 0,951 Fit Protected satd. Flow (prot) , FII Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red l)atctcFlow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Dislance (ft) . Travel Time (s) Peak.HotJr. Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Sharedlane Traffic ('Yo). Lane Group Flow (vph) fumTypli Protected Phases Pe,rmitted,Ph'asas Total Split (s) Tojal'to~Ti~(s) Act Effct Green (s) Acluate,d.gIC Ratio vie Ratio Control !Jel ,ay Queue Delay Iota! D$lay LOS /fpproacl1JWay , Approach LOS Qileue Lllnglh 51Jth (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Intemall.:ink,Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) llaseC""acity. (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn SpitlljIiclcC<jp Reductn Storage Cap Reductn ~ediited Vie Ratio Cycle Length: 105 ActUatedCycle'ten9th: 105 0.950 1770 0.950 1770 21.0 4.0 17.0 0.16 1.64 332.9 0.0 332.9 F -459 #656 3415 3415 o.ro 470 470 Prot 3 37.9 4.9 28.7 0.27 0.77 38.8 0.0 38.8 D 153.0 F 227 282 395 39 40 475 8.1 0.90 569 0.950 0 1770 3366 0.950 0 17Z0 . 3366 Yes 40 504 8.6 0.90 0.90 . 0.90 172 124 317 0 124 470 7 4 18.0 34.9 11.2 22.9 0.11 0.22 0.66 0.59 0.90 153 0.950 0.950 741 8 0.950 0.950 Yas Yes Yes 40 40 0.90 . 0;90 ' 0.90 ' 0.90 122 740 83 184 .0.90 374 o 122 823 o 184 1236 0 6 5 2 0.0 9.0 4:0 12.0 0.61 0.0 E 80 #229 180 0 0 38.1 0.0 11.0 40.1 0.0 ,5.2 ' 4.0 35.0 0.33 1.05 74.3 0.0 74.3 E 73.6 . E -464 #601 265 14.1 0.75 0.77 0.0 0.0 ,32.7 E C '38.7 D 122 139 162 424 0.0 0.0 D E D 329 #316 100 o 0 150 1174 0 0 0 0 0 T:I 1931 101 \August 07 -UpdateISynchroINo-Build-2009.syn Synchro 7 - Report Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: CR E & Lexin~ton Avenue Offset: 0 9/17/2007 Maximum vie Ratio: 1.64 Intersection Utilization 89.1 % leu Level of Service E - Volume exceeds # 95th volume exceeds t~:!Z:IIII=~: lIt: ~ n~I'!i1 j T:\ 1931\01\Au9ust 07 -Update\Synehro\No-Build-2009.syn Synehro 7 - Report HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: CR E & N. Dvwy 9/17/2007 -l- -r-- '-",,\ t ~ ~~~~~~~ Lane Configurations "i +t. "i +t. 4 'f .;. VQlurr,e(ileli/h) 1009 5631 672 29'. 51'. . 1 ~}2 9. '~O';:! .Q~.3 Control Free Free 0% 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 1121 62 34 747 32 y. '-. + .,; 0.90 0.90 0.90 Peak Hour Factor I:IOWly fli:>w rate (vph) Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (IUs) Percent Blockage Ri9ht turn flare (veh) M<i~ifin lype ~. '. . Median storage veh) ~pStream signat (ft)~ pX, platoon unblocked ~y confliGtiD9 volume vCl, stage 1 conf vol \tC2~Stage 2 eonf vol vCu, unblocked vol !C;smgle (s) 2 2 475 0.95 779 1183 0.95 0.95 t609 2011 0.95 0.95 592 654 4.1 1183 4.1 1531 1956 592 1314 1971 243 2.2 94 586 21 98 82 88 100 100 lIo!ume Tolal Ii 436 34 498 lIolume Left 6 0 0 34 0 0 57 10 lIOlume Right 0 0 62 0 0 32 cSH 879 1700 1700 586 1700 1700 160 108 Volume to Bapacity 0,01 0.44 0.26 0.06 029 0.17 0.86 ' 0,12 Queue Lenglh 95th (ft) 0 0 0 5 0 0 149 10 COntrol Delay (s) '.9.1 0'.0 0.0 11.5 0'.0 42.8 Lane LOS A B F E AWroaCh Delay IS) 0.5 Approach LOS F E ICU Level of Service Synchro 7 - Report T:I 1931101 \August 07 -UpdateISynchroINo-Build-2009.syn HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: S Dvwy & LexinQton Ave 9/17/2007 -" " "\ t + ..; Lane Configurations fQI~J!l~I~MgJflfi}!s2, "" Control Free 0% 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 96 . 58 1082 71 Peak Hour Factor flq~MJlQw rate (1IP1l) Pedestrians Walking Speed (ftls) l'~f~lltBloCk~e" ". Right turn flare (veh) ~art$~~:,~" . Median storage veh) (jpw<!~ilis.gnal\ft) "" pX. platoon unblocked Y€'f~oijfJiGti9~ yolume . vCl, stage 1 conf vol ~ie~e";tCohfvol vCu, unblocked vol !l::jsi[ig!~ler.;.; " 2 pO queue free % ~ij:jlfJ!~(vllh/h) Volume Left cSH yo!liq,e:iq~-aPacity Queue Length 95th (ft) ContWlbela(s)"' . .w'w. .Y. Lane LOS R.ilfJioaeiLS:elay.{s) Approach LOS Average Delay ltiW~\ffioD" l;apacity Utilization Period 19.0 M.l% 15 ICU Level of Service Synchro 7 - Report T:11931101\August 07 -UpdateISynchroINo-Build-2009 .syn Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: CR E & Lexington Avenue 9/17/2007 --" -\-...-- "'-,\ t t' '. ~ ~ . Lane Configurations ,tt. "I tt. ,tt. "I tt. \[!lIilii!i(VjJllji::~',<::, . ',' 442 522 155 125, 294 138110 670n', t06 ,803, .355 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 ~lQEa1ie::1:oog1ii.(Jt)::?'::', ' . 200 0 100 0 180 Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ Lane Util. Factor 100 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 100 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.966 0.952 Fit Protected Fit Permitted Right Turn on Red Satdil7lHw(~Jffi}~: Link Speed (mph) LIDltJ"Js!au6ittlt),: . Travel Time Phases vie Ratio LOS Approach QUeO&'L~n9!~5oth (fl) Queue Length 95th (It) lr\lefliiilLmk'bisl(ltt. : Turn Say Length (It) S' "c r("'l1': .?~! apaclty.1IP J' Starvation Cap Reduc1n ~pjlltXqCK:~ap Reducln' Storage Cap Reductn R.equC@:v/cRatiQ:..:,.:, Cycle Length: 105 ActUil!aqCycle Length: 105 0.950 1770 3419 0.950 1770 3419 0.950 0.950 0 1770 3369. 0 0.950 0.950 0 1770 3369. 0 '1770 Yes Yes 0.950 0.950 Yes 40 40 5.9 O.1m 0.90: ':0.90 " 'lJ.90 0.90 744 86 184 892 394 830 0 184 1286 0 6 5 2 T:I 1931 101\August 07 -UpdateISynchroISuild-2009.syn 0_90 491 39 40 475 8.1 0.90 580 40 '. 504 8.6 0.90 0.90 153 122 180 188 o o o 0.65 13.2 35.9 0.34 0.73 0.83 1.07 35.6 79.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 35.6 D E E 39,5 D E 255 327 #316 #625 489 150 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.90 172 0,90 139 327 491 Pro! 3 o 139 480 Prot' 7 4 o 122 Prot 1 752 8 20.0 38.9 4.0 4.9 16.0 28.9 0.15 0.28 1.82 0.78 410.9 38.8 0.0 0.0 410.9 3K8 F D 185.8 F -500 230 #701 282 395 200 270 1133 o 0 o 0 o 0 1.82 0.66 9.0 4.0 112 0.11 0.65 65.6 0.0 65.6 E 10.9 23.8 0.10 0.23 0.76 0.58 71.0 32.6 0.0 0.0 71.0 32.6 . E C 41.2 D 91 125. #178 167 424 100 202 1015 o 0 82 #229 Synchro 7 - Report Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: CR E & Lexington Avenue Offset: 0 Referenced to 9/17/2007 Maximum vie Ratio: 1.82 Intersection Utilization 91.8% leu Level of Service F - Volume exceeds is # 95th volume exceeds ~ti':~~:b~r".'ill:-:~ T:I 1931 101\August 07 -UpdateISynchroIBuild-2009.syn Synchro 7 - Report HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: CR E & N. Dvwy 9/17/2007 .? - ,. of - '- ~ t ~ \. + .; ,-~~ ., 4- 101 . !f~' .' ~(}~. . ','3 ~~~~=~'ff' Lan,'; C~n~gurations ~ ~. '. ~."i ~ tt. "i tt. +t ~ol~m~lveWhl ~', .~~. ~ ~5.,~1009 ~ 91 58 672 29 Control Free Free 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 64 747 32 Pedestrians 0.90 0.90 0.90 2 475 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 1222 1688 2091 611 1464 2125. 1222 1629 2049 611 1394 2085 4.1 7.5 6:9 7.5 ~ pX, platoon unblocked iIDtGooii'tCtlng volume. vC 1, stage 1 conf vol ~ ~~s{?:9'i!~.i:9nfvol unblocked vol 678 64 Volume Left 6 0 0 64 101 0 cSH 870 1700 1700 566 0.28 0.11 Queue 0 0 0 10 12.2 Lane LOS A B 0.9 Approach LOS % 99 100 100 119 1,65 368 391:0 F 391.0 ~ F 83 '0.11> 14 56,6 F 56.6 F 51.5% 15 ICU Level of Service Synchro 7 - Report T:\ 1931\01\August 07 -Updale\Synchro\Build-2009.syn HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: S Dvwy & Lexin9ton Ave 9/17/2007 ~ .,. '\ t ~ .; Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 116 Pedestrians 2 None None Median 569 pX, platoon unblocked \i~{Cfin1flGtiJ1g:~iliiiffie .. .'.. vel, stage 1 confvol j/B~l~eif~v&!~%~ unblocked vol 0.70 0.70 0.70 2287 599 1198 Volume Left 1982 0 428 6.9 4-1 86 790 cSH Lane LOS Approach LOS Average Delay !tjterfe9t1Qil.~~Re9i!ydJtiliza\ion. . Period 46.9 54.1% 15 leu Level of Service Synchro 7 - Report T:I 1931101 \Au9ust 07 -UpdateISynchroI8uild-2009.syn ..J- _.... -f'- "..... t r \. +..; . L~n_e,~~~~9u~~\~~;~_ ~ _ l'C. t'f> "i t'f> "i t'f> _ . _ _ "I,. t'f>_ lIJjJomQ~vnl!t~'csic33';'\ ~.->4.'I.2>', 52;> 155 125 294' 138. -. .,110 670, . 77 .166~,' 803.~ 355 IdQal Flow 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 o 100 o 1 25 25 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95.2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: CR E & Lexington Avenue Lanes 0.950 0.950 0.950 0 1770 3369 0 1770 3483 1770'_ 3376 0.366 0.110 0.176 0 682 -3369 0 205 _ 3483 '. '0 Yes Yes Yes 41 63 40 40 40 475 504 569 8.1 8.6 9.7 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 '0.90 '0.90 . 0.90 0.90- 580 172 139 327 153 122 744 86 184 Lane Util. Factor Fit Protected 0.950 Fit Permitted 0.194 491 491 752 0 139 480 nm+pt 8 7 4 4 0.0 13.0 21.9 4.0 4.0 4.9 35.3 25.8 16.6 0.34 0.25 0.16 0.64 0.55 0.82 27.8 49.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 .30.3 27.8 49.5 C C D 4'1.6 D D .205 50 144 268 87 #218 395 424 100 265 601 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.52 '0.80 Protected Phases 3 Total Act Eftct Green 48.5 vlc Ratio 0.93 0.0 LOS D Queue Length 95th (ft) #441 lnte(nallfifli'Qist\ft)c, ',.' ". . Turn 200 Reductn 0 o Cycle Len9th: 105 Actuate&Q~I'Ie:liei;gtl1;105 . o 25 0.95 1 25 . 1.00 911712007 o o 25 0.95 o 122 pm+nt. 1 6 0.0 9.0 4.0 4.0 43.3 0.41 0.71 44.6 0.0 44.6 D 48 #129 180 171 o O. o 0.71 0.95 0.984 0.95 1.00 0.95 o Yes 0.90 394 830 o 184 1286 o 6 40.1 5.2 36.3 0.35 0.68 32.9 0.0 32.9 C 34.4 C 251 322 489 0.0 10.0 41.1 0.0 0.44 0.36 0.77 1.03 '13.9 64:9 0.0 0.0 '13..9 64.9 D E E 75 -'188 #177 #625 265 150 240 1264 0 0 0 0 1212 o Q o 0,68 T:\ 1931\01 \Au9ust 07 -Undate\Synchro\Build-2009_Miti9ation.syn Synchro 7 - Report Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: CR E & Lexin~ton Avenue Offset: 0 9/17/2007 Maximum vie Ratio: 1.03 Intersection Utilization 91.8% leu Level of Service F Volume exceeds is volume exceeds tf \. :;, ~t:~~ ,,,,,omOOO'- t f · ~ ,,:~'::,::::/ ~=~~.i8~: '~:l"~' Synchro 7 - Report T:\ 1931 \01\August 07 -Update\Synchro\Build-2009 _Mitigation.syn HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: CR E & N. Dvwy 9/17/2007 .-J- - ~ .( +- '- '\ t ~ ~ + .; Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Pedestrians Service A Period 15 Synchro 7 - Report T:\ 1931\01\August 07 -Update\Synchro\Build-2009 _Mitigation.syn HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 9: S Dvwy & Lexington Ave 9/17/2007 .-J- "). '" t + .; Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 1082 116 Pedestrians 64 108 0 0 90 801 1700 1700 394 12 0 0 0 0.0 Lane LOS F B Approach LOS F 9 . None 569 0.69 0.69 o 399 15 Synchro 7 - Report T:\ 1931\01\Au9ust 07 -Update\Synchro\Buiid-2009 _Miti9ation.syn Attachment 3 c- 3 Public Comments/Letters ~ ~H1LLS October 3, 2007, Planning Commission Meeting R{B~'~ :j F;lEs 8/28/07 Dear Mayor and Arden Hills Council; I have recently become aware of plarmed retail and office construction at the current Arden Plaza area at Cnty Rd E and Lexington and also at the Holiday Inn on Cnty Rd E. Although I am not a resident of Arden Hills, I shop this area daily. I can imagine that the increased traffic resulting from these planned changes will overwhelm the current road system. This will happen despite the fact that there is likely insufficient parking available in the plans being developed. These are some logistic issues. On another note, I am strongly opposed to the concept of bringing a Walgreens to Arden Plaza. From a Pharmaceutical aspect and general retail aspect we have Target, Cub and Arden Plaza Pharmacy in close proximity and a Walgreens just down the street in Roseville. What really is the point? We don't want this small space to become the Big Box Playground for Arden Hills, at the disastrous expense of long time home-grown retail business. Please think this through carefully. This is a rocky road to travel on. Best regards, /1 147 Larry Mahoney 2775 Lexington; #202 Roseville, MN 55113 651-335-3467 - '+-< o - <!) ~ ~ lI: 0 .c <:: .c 1Il ...J Ul 1Il E '" ..., W <:: 1ii '" " E 0 " @) Cl <:: :J (3 " E 1Il > '" " E: 8 '0 '" oj @) N '" '" ~ c:: ~ .c <:: <:: 1Il Jg 'E <l: E .S; 0 Ul " <:: '0 1Il '" ~ @) Cl -.;t ~ N E <:: '" 1Il Cl " <:: '0 :OJ .c '5 .;..; c. <:: '5 ~ 0 (91 .0 '" "'" 2 " Cl 1Il <l: .;; <:: <:: '" :.s2 1ii a Cl <:: to :E '" Oi .;..; " 1Il '" - E r- <:: N <:: a 1ii '" 1Il 0 a c:: > " N ~ 1Il @) <:: ~ >- ~ E 1Il :J " '" 8 'E 0 " - <l: >- Q) Ul @) .9 <:: :J .S; ui = 0 Cl " ro I " :J '" Ul '0 0 ~ <l: * <:: .c 1Il iE :>; 1Il 0 C <:: c. ~ .c 0 '" ~ Cl Jg " " '" ~ Q) [jJ ." .c J: ...I "- 'in' >- ". Iii -'" UI .;.; <:: :J Ul Q) E " 1Il 0 '" E .;.; .. 'E ." :J e <:: :5' <l: Q) 0 l'G .. 0 " ~ Ul >- "") "- CIJ I- CIJ '" E >- Q) '" ~ Cl ". - '" .c en - Ul ro " ". W <:: Q) '" Cl Q) ~ Ul <:: Ul '00 0 '" '" " Ul iE.c Ul ~"';: Q) <:: ~ <:: ::s - +-' '00 E~~ :J E 0 ~ .0 o E '" .2 " >- E Ul '" <:: Q) Ul .!!1 '" .c Q) - " " .S; <:: " <:: - 0 :J '" :J Ul C. gj,,, " - :J <:: Q) <:: ~ '" .~ 0 " ~ 5," - '" >-~~~ '" _ (I) U 0- .= ca ..... 0 N .e CP U) a. '" "O-~m c:: C : 0) >. <:: co ,'-"'C 1Il 1Il .c '" 'E ~ ID (l) ~ ._..c::..c:: - <l: -c.....-ct1 .S; C..c:: Q) UJ ro C> > .- Ul (;j~n:J- 1Il .....o..c::< <:: ~~~;S '00 :J o >. c cD .0 U)-o..::.::E Q) Cl '" Qi 0 = :J ~ Ul -- ~ ro ;: = <::0 " .!!1 1Il <:: ClUl 'j: :20 <:: .- Ul Ul Ul ~ :0:::; 0 <:: lIlro .!!1 iE Q) Ul >-~c. Q) x ]l ~ E ";:Q) Q) .Ql i1j.!!! E Q) 1Il ~ >- >.- .c .c ~ <::Q)- l- I- O~Cl ,,0<:: r- . . _.co . . wcn...J 0 0 ~ !(> 0\ JOHN & ROSEMARY HaRVEl, P.A. 992 Tiller Lane Shoreview, MN 55126 August 31 , 2007 Arden Hills Public Administrators Arden Hills City Hall 1245 W. Highway 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112 Attn: James Lehnhoff j ames .lehnhoff@ci.arden-hills.mn.us Dear Mr. Lehnhoff: My wife and I have for 23 years lived at 992 Tiller Lane, Shoreview, just east of Lexington and south of Co. Rd. E. We have been customers of Arden Pharmacy (Arden Plaza) to date and are very pleased with their service. We object to Walgreens coming in with a "big box" store at the corner of Lexington and Co. Rd. E for several reasons: 1) Arden Pharmacy would lose its lease; 2)big box pharmacies already in place (Cub and Target); 3) traffic congestion and parking at the current complex are bad already; and 4) afternoon traffic is always jammed because a train daily shuts down Lexington and Co. Rd. E during rush hour. Northern Arden Hills, Shoreview and North Oaks certainly could use a new Walgreens along Highway 96 (I suggest the corner of Hwy 96 and Hwy 10). The personal relationships by the staff at Arden Pharmacy these past 23 years are important and we consider them "family" when it comes to our needs. I can't imagine that to be the case with the bog box chains like CVS or Walgreens. I hope you do NOT approve this request by Walgreens. Sincerely, 90k fl. -;:?towei/kam John J. Horvei, P.A. JJH:kam cc: Arden Pharmacy 3529 N. Lexington Ave. Arden Hills, MN 55126 JOHN & ROSEMARY HaRVEl, P.A. 992 Tiller Lane Shoreview, MN 55126 August 31, 2007 Arden Hills Public Administrators Arden Hills City Hall 1245 W. Highway 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112 Attn: Mayor Stan Harpstead sjharpstead@comcast.net Dear Mayor Harpstead: My wife and 1 have for 23 years lived at 992 Tiller Lane, Shoreview, just east of Lexington and south of Co. Rd. E. We have been customers of Arden Pharmacy (Arden Plaza) to date and are very pleased with their service. We object to Walgreens coming in with a "big box" store at the corner of Lexington and Co. Rd. E for several reasons: 1) Arden Pharmacy would lose its lease; 2)big box pharmacies already in place (Cub and Target); 3) traffic congestion and parking at the current complex are bad already; and 4) afternoon traffic is always jammed because a train daily shuts down Lexington and Co. Rd. E during rush hour. Northern Arden Hills, Shoreview and North Oaks certainly could use a new Walgreens along Highway 96 (I suggest the corner of Hwy 96 and Hwy 10). The personal relationships by the staff at Arden Pharmacy these past 23 years are important and we consider them "family" when it comes to our needs. I can't imagine that to be the case with the bog box chains like CVS or Walgreens. I hope you do NOT approve this request by Walgreens. Sincerely, pok fl. ~owei/kam John J. Horvei, P.A. JJH:kam cc: Arden Pharmacy 3529 N. Lexington Ave. Arden Hills, MN 55126 John & Rosemary Horvei, P.A. 992 Tiller Lane Shoreview, MN 55126 August 31, 2007 Arden Hills Public Administrators Arden Hills City Hall 1245 W. Highway 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112 Attn: James Lehnhoff james.lehnhoff@ci.arden-hills.mn.us Dear Mr. Lehnhoff: My wife and I have for 23 years lived at 992 Tiller Lane, Shoreview, just east of Lexington and south of Co. Rd. E. We have been customers of Arden Pharmacy (Arden Plaza) to date and are very pleased with their service. We object to Walgreens coming in with a "big box" store at the corner of Lexington and Co. Rd. E for several reasons: 1) Arden Pharmacy would lose its lease; 2)big box pharmacies already in place (Cub and Target); 3) traffic congestion and parking at the current complex are bad already; and 4) afternoon traffic is always jammed because a train daily shuts down Lexington and Co. Rd. E during rush hour. Northern Arden Hills, Shoreview and North Oaks certainly could use a new Walgreens along Highway 96 (I suggest the corner of Hwy 96 and Hwy 10). The personal relationships by the staff at Arden Pharmacy these past 23 years are important and we consider them "family" when it comes to our needs. I can't imagine that to be the case with the bog box chains like CVS or Walgreens. I hope you do NOT approve this request by Walgreens. Sincerely, John J. Horvei/kam John J. Horvei, P.A. JJH:kam cc: Arden Pharmacy 3529 N. Lexington Ave. Arden Hills, MN 55126 D' Ann Bagan Hair Expressions 3553 Lexington Ave. Arden Hills, MN 55126 To Whom it may concern: I am writing on behalf of Hair Expressions in the Arden Plaza. Our salon has been located in the Arden Plaza for about 25 years and has developed a solid client base. Our salon draws clients from as far as a 45 mile radius. We have a strong commitment to the location and have recently renovated our space. We are in support of the renovations being done to the Arden Plaza. We feel it would help our business as well as all the other businesses around us. Having an updated mall front as well as some new businesses would help draw business to the mall. When our salon took part in the Slice of Shoreview last summer, it was amazing how many people never heard of us or the Arden Plaza and have lived in the area for a very long time. The mall has no "curb appeal" to draw people in. It is not very visible from the road and the parking lot is half empty most of the time, which makes the mall look "not worth going to". We would prefer the parking to be kept away from the storefronts. I think it makes each business more visible without cars parked there all the time. We feel a well established chain restaurant of some type would be a positive influence on the community. If the people of Arden Hills and Shoreview have to leave the area to eat, they will probably shop in another area out of convenience. We are concerned that an Aldi store would not bring in the right clientele for the existing businesses. I think it's important to look at businesses that would fit the community. The traffic on Lexington and Co Rd E is only backed up when the train crosses Lexington. There are not residences that would be affected by extra traffic to the mall and it would help all the new and existing businesses in the area. We can only see this renovation to the Arden Plaza as a positive change for the community. Thank you, D'fum~~ 8~v () dl tf~l~. f.-~y \ . <r2~tSvLcL ~~ L~~J \ ~L~'r-- ~f\~ U [Uu4J VY1M ~~.~ ~ "-< o ~ 0) OJ) '" p.., := o ..c c ..c Ql ...I Ul Ql E l'll .., :2 a. N 10 Eo; o f'- ~ 0 C 0 '" N E -<i @)o 00 ~ 00 '" '" .c ~ E m 2 ~ '" e. 0 :Eo w ..c UJ U) ..2 ~ ,.:;.3 ~ ~ ~ '" ::J '" Of-...., oW u E oW CIl o c .. :c' U: ~ ~ ~ '" N '" c:: C '" 'E <( .!: '" c '" ~ Ol ~ it:: o .r::: c .r::: '" --' ~ '" C C '" c:: >- ..... (] >- c ~ E '" 00'" C J::.!: ~~Ol .c '" 'c~ E l... C'l'- 2c;!-J Ul '2 c .- I.. ""0 Q):J"S u.....o C ~ U ~{9- t:l1J1 "'......r::: cv@g "0"00 l....u c >-u'" ....."'"0 c '" '" ::J::J.c 8 ,2 (/) '" ~ '" .r:::"'~ .....'" L..ctJ1: 0"0 '" cW3:! .8m~ Ol"'", .f: .5 .j...I ~ .~~ - ..... ~ "'0'0 .r::: Ol C ....."'''' c ~ ~ 0", 0 w ~1i) EltJli <1.l-l-'t) '" ::J ~ NOe. '" .c Ol i'i. <( C Ul ."S; -.....0 :E:BE ~ C.....Vl '" Vl '" "Ew~ ",.r::: u Q)~~ ..cQ)'m ~.8.b o C I ro .j.J 0 ""0 ~ :J 0lQ) co o .!::E (IJ ""0 > U'l'- co"O..c "'E"'..... c e .f: .- ID..c Q) O'IuUltJ) C c ro ctJ :i:ira:>Q) .....s::>L.. Q) u..s:: ~ en I... U.- I :J:C u w !;. ~ it: "OQ)c~ ctI.:::.:::04-' erornco >.-I-Ic..,C L.. :J'-.j...I .... 0 X.- C >- '" ~ ::l - o I 0 Ul U (/)..... ~ C :J Q) Ul o e"O Q) u Q) ro .f: !Ege~ ~ ",~.o ....."'OcO) Q) "0 :J L. ..ceoo f-",uE ~ QJ.g .r::: '" -:-" E ~ '" ",.r::: C..... '" 0 '" Vl "'Om J!! C ._ 0 1m ::l c C ._ X ., '" ~- .- c OlO "0 C '" vi >-"0 ~ro E 5 ~"O '" u -E.E Vl"O -c .r:::'" c ., ",2 "0'" ~ > '" Vl "'= E:E '" c Vl '" ::J"O ~ ~'" , -- cO. o ~~ -rnctJro C..... c ')($,2 OJ Qj (/) -~13 C 0'" u '" 0 "Ou..... C C Vl l1J ~ ~ "'::J '" "OVl.r::: '-.f: ..... >- >- "0 1:: = C ::l E '" 8 ~-5 c c'C or3"8 Ul 'C 0 ",,,,(9 :ilE-- "''''.0 C ::l "Vi Co'" U :J '-.... .0"'..... "'~~ .r:::"O~ -l-lro19 ......r::: o 0 ....."'u ~~o E--E 'l-gc:( 0._ a.. cCCO o::l , .b~U) '" "0 '" c.~~ '" u '" E "'.!: .....Vl ro19:J ~Vl.o .;.,' '" e' '" f- ..... o .... '" ""- ~ '" E Vl Vl '" E '" .r::: ..... E o ~ ..... >- '" ~ '" Vl ~ Co 0..... :p Ul .g.~ b'Cl Vl..... '" '" B.~ ~ Ol .E '" "'"0 ~ C .s '" Vl.r::: ..... u '" '" '" 0 ~ ~ Ole. '" g- .~ c .r::: ~ u 0 :E4J ~ '" ~ E ._ 0 (9.r::: "0'" c.r::: ro:t;: >-~ u >- '" u E '" ~ E '" ~ .r:::", o...r::: .J!)e. =... J: '" '" C ~ '" 01 'E '" <(tl '" ::J .r:::'~ ..... Vl ..... .- o~ ~ ' .- .0 1::: ::l gy e."O ::l C Vl '" .....Vl Vl C 0", E ~ E.2' '" '" ~:s: .!a '" ~..... '" '" .r:::.r::: .......... , - Vl '" >-J!! ;::~ '" >->- co:;;! o C ..... '" ..... ~ x..... ","0 C C >-"! '" . ~ : ". '" Vl >- c..... VlO= ~:p '0 .- c. ro Eo..... ~ >- ~ '" C 0 """'.r::: ",E"<t "O",N 2m~ ~ QJ : .QQjul ",.r:::"O c.....'" O Vl 0 C ~ Vl '" C .~ ~ 'co ~ 01 E ~mQ) .....~.r::: ..... 'g"'it:: lOBo , 0 ~ Ul C1~ moo "'.....0 ~.......... OlCVl - l1J'- "',...... :s: ,. .- .&-I:Z:I '" Iii E e.",o O'-J:: .r:::::J"O Vl 0 '" o >-= "C~ij:: ~,'" '......0 Vl '" 0 c"'..... aJ.bt/) '" Ul C t:n (]) .2 ro .~ b.. :s: C::'C ro c ~ ~ 0 '" ~wc. c.r::: ~ oi:~ .- ::J u'l-V) "'"0 ::J >.ce C '" '" '" '" 01 L. 0'1 ~ ~ >'-0 .- co 0 ~~.8 8 .2l Ul ~ :c .;; '" C 0 VJO:p '" '" '" '" C u C:o.Q C o :.::; ~ '" "0 'w C o u ~ ::J o >- ~ o ..... ::J o >- ""- C '" .r::: f- ~ .2 ..... u '" e. Vl ~ Vl ~ <( Ul '" ~ .0 '" o t-- o o C:! ~ FROM ACC0LADE CORPORATION FAX NO. 551 483 0315 Sep. 04 2007 08:07PM P2 Kirit Mody . 4292 Brigadoon Drive , Sl1oreview; MN 55126 September 3,2007 Mr.James Lehnhoff City Planner Arden Hill City Hall 1245 W. Hwy 96 Arden Hills, MN "I.. Dear Mr. Lehnhoff: : ,~: . :,. I spoke to you last week regarding our concern for the addition of a Grocery Store and Drug store in the present Arden Hill Shopping :Center: . As I mentioned to yon, I am not a resident of Arden Hills. I am from Shoreview on the other side of the Lexington Avenue. We are affected by the expansion of the shopping center fur Drug store and Grocery store for the following reasons: 1) Traffic at the comer of Lexington and County Road E is already congested. It is very difficult to get in and out of the shopping center parking lot with the present traffic. If you add a Big Box Drug store and Grocery store., it is going to be dangerous for the citizens of Arden Hills and Shoreview who are being served by the present businesses in the shopping center. 2) As you know, the traffic from YMCA, Cub Foods / Subway Shopping Center and Target bring lots of traffic. Most of the cars go through County Road E & Lexington. If these establishments were not there then new Grocery Store and Drug Store would be welcome. But with present situation any additional traffic, will affect the safety of the area. 3) In addition to above mentioned establishments, the Marathon Service Station brings lots of traffic. 4) The City of Arden Hills gave permission to developer to build office building beside the shopping center which was fine. Now the developer wants to change the office building to drug store and grocery store. I think there are lots of issues the planning commission, Council members, mayor and planner will have to address regarding safety and ecological implications. FROM ACC0LADE CORPORATION FAX NO. 551 483 0315 SEp. 04 2007 08:08PM P4 We residents of Shore view strongly recommend that Arden Hills does not approve the expansion because of the iIicreased traffic& impact on safety. Please find attached sheet with other conoemed citizens who do not support this expansion. ~'incereIY~ ~. 1 -1--' ,. ~ft : ~~ Mr. Stan Harpstead, Mayor Mr. David Grant Ms. Brenda Holden Ms. Fran Holmes Mr, Dave McClung. Mr. David Sand, Chairman of Planning Commission -~0 ~U . > 4'2.4,\ ~"lJ~()"w-(' p. s: ?f~ d;6thiWQ ''fh' ev~>>;t~ "&'YL ''i-Le- Co f7gjj t:. ---t' ~0 ~~~'.f'~1. .. FROM : ACC0LADE CORPORAT ION FAX NO. : 651 483 0316 Sep. 04 2007 08:07PM P3 d H. (Lft( ~ ~ ~f6 ~~~U 42~<\ ~"",dO~ OA~v--€ ~<;t -4"10' qq+8 . tVtj/v.ht/.~~ C5ko~ Vi "'~ /: e-s;"dJ A;f,2J?c" gu?~kJu j)/L- b5'/- t/gz ~o7'i9 I/,~~r~ ~P1ovvrQvy-fl~JVy{rJ ~ (.<<J M,N .'55 1J.4; I (fiif~ tfSt,,-owrv ftv vv<.. !3,)O-lA-1 ~ ')- ~ 0 13Y13 c~ VV' $y~y"w"i'e<.-rJl hrJ 551 :Y& (~. 51) If'~(p v 17010 :JdtYl,^-~ Lf (?1 ~7/t J~(ll]Y, $jufe.,tAw fill N 85);;Lfi ~51 -t(ru--1(3J i4f;v~ &11 H~1f.e;r f)r. . ~ ~)YV ; e~ /;4 Wyfl?JP C 0\'",";,,--<-- ~ ~~,~<kr- 'lS\~.;''-V ~..~ 'i2QG 6r<-lQJ.~[U\.. O(J..cf~ ~wc(ma f1 i.fJ- ;J ~tv. qri cf[j',)D\ ~rl Jh1J7ju'11l.fi) I yrllt 'Ss I;)G 1)iX-Mvlcfr 1J~+ ~ Jf?&(P ]vi.~U~ D- - ~h~+J;v 55"1"z.-(.., Vd/)n r- E4J /.ll1bSUk.. lf9ltJ &I'~ft-#~ ;tJ~ Stf~~..I)1) .>T7:26 ~.)y q. f1&m 9~. LJ}:syg('iJ~ f)'" ~..~) IJ VI.. J;5/)./; '1~---tvL ~ ~ ?-f.2.....- '::;,- c::; [1"v1C)\A eJ)oo''';'' 0..- S Vv> i<<'-.. \j\,"Go.-/ ~ ~-S\ '}' \Q FROM : ACC0LADE CORPORATION FAX NO. : 651 483 0316 Sep. 04 2007 08:08PM P5 f'llflNo' lli", 0~rv'~ lit") 7 (~)l6~oCYh Df S hV'(eN~ LV If\ Y7 ~31~ (/, Y) ~ J)q/';i. tJcU2.J>>~ 1099 15f?-19cr1C00 e-+ J ~~"X12e 1/1iJJ..J) 'fnrJ ::rEff~fUDAJ/L YIJPA QJ EL:> 0/0 1228' 13RI6~G-V"-J PI2" S liV1Z8.lIfiv', vY7tJ 0/21, ~rlO;'~ 'lifuk ~d~~ Lthc~CON DI S~Vvtv MN S3l&6~ Sep 05 2007 1:53PM ARDEN PHARMACY 651 482 0710 p.l September 4, 2007 Mr. David Sand, Chair Arden Hills Planning Commission 1245 W Hwy 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112 651-792-7800 Dear Mr. Sand; As a long time resident of Arden Hills, we are shocked and saddened by the proposal to put a Walgreens into the Arden Plaza shopping center. One of the many reasons that we love Arden Hills is the sll\QlI-town community feel. We don't want or need big box, impersonal stores like Walgreens. And we certairtly don't need the increased tr<<ffic nor the non-Arden Hills residents tI1at a Walgrcens would bring to the area. Speaking of the tl'Clffic, have you visited the shopping center on a weekday at IUllch time or after work? You con Iitel'Cllly woit minutes to turn from either County Rd E or Lexington Ave into the shopping center, and it's worse trying to make a left hand turn to get out of the shopping center. Increasing the space for people to wait to get out of the shopping center is NOT a solutionll It'I$ even worse if the gdes ore down for G train crossing. And if you are getting the applicant to do a traffic study, please Il\Qke sure that it's during the September thru May time frame, when t1'<lffic is "normal" (we're sure you realize that the summer months produce much lighter traffic, with school out and IIlOIIY people taking vocations. fl'Clm talking with many of my neighbors, they feel the some way. We hope that you ore taking the feelings of the residents into consideration. We understand that some of the busineSS members in Arden PloZll have expressed a positive response to a Walgreens - but they dllll't live in Arden Hills and should I~ot get a say in what we want in our communilyl Please rethink the application to bring the big bOlC world to Arden Plaza. We don't wont them, don't need them, don't need the increased traffic. so please vote NO!! Please: also share this letter with Mayor Stan Harpstead and the CoWICiI, we would appreciate it. Thanking you in advance for your considel'Cltion, u\~~~~ AgatJ R~s;o~ 3445 Glen Arden Ct Arden Hill$. MN 55112 - <...., Q) 0 rn E en - ~ III I ~ e: Q) O'l e: oj '0 :c Q) P- 'w 'E l!! III <( ,., '0 ..c .9 e: uif- III en .!: 1D enz en rn :gw Q) e: e: .~ e: 0 uj 'w:2 'w .~ III Q) :::IZ :::I :::I 0 E ..co:: ..c 0 E E ow - .!: 0 0 0 '0> - Z 0 0 "'0 :::I @) - 2!(!) 0 w 0 '5 w O'l Q) -0:: 0:: e: 0 130 c. (!) :::I e: Q) 1l III :Ez ..... rn ~en ..c ~ E 0 ..c e:f- - Q) > '0 .-z e: f- III ~ gjw III en '0 e :.;::::;0 = Z E 'fij(jj en <( c. rn 0 .5 ow (9 ~ .20:: '0 <( ~ lE 0 .e Q)en w III .<::..... 0 f- @) '0 -..... - 0 Q) E- e: to Q) oI Q) > ~ e: ol=z E , ~ e: Q) I Q) enw ~ .<:: "'0 Q) O'l e: - > e: ~ Q) :go:: 0 III LL ro >.0<( O'l .<:: '0 EELL ~ 0 E 'Qi '0 l!! 0-0 = e: 0 c. e: 0 III ~ c. O~f- - en 0 III oOen 0 '0 III Q)""W ~ Q) @) :::I rnQ)O:: :m Q) 0 o.<::W Q) e: .,. ,., O-f- ..c ~ N l!! -enZ B Q)e:_ Q) e: :::I ='~ l- e: .2 Q) en Q) '0 en t::'Oen en .9 0 III O'OW Q) en I Q) c.e:a:l '0 '0 ..... E g-roW .: Q) e: enQ)I > 0 e: ]i "'0 a:P- 2 'E c. III en ~ en 0 (!)I .: e:.<::z III c. l!! 0 lIl~_ en c. - '0 e! e:Q)f- ij :::I III 'S: Q) 'ffiJ!lO rn en = III C. Q1wz '0 ~ en 0 ~ ~Q)en rn en 'ffi .<::E- 'E 0 Q) 1D .<:: .2000 Q) .2 e: :2 ~ 0 c. 'w e: .<::oZ :::I <( uj O'l ~.!:W en '0 :::I I e: Q) ..c (J) III 13 W.=w III 1:5. rn .,. 0 e: cma::: .!!l cici E Q) III m:5C,!) Q)J!l 0 'E - 0.= .2 ..... 0 '0 Een..... III gjI E 0 0 <( e: ~~~ .<:: - 0 0 @) '" - ~e: 0 ~ N .9 ~ =0$ - ,.,Q) l!! '0 ~.!!i~ E I :::I = '0 ..... l!i III O'l ..c "'~ .a 0 0 Q) .!: E=., en E e: 0<( .2 <( ~ R E Q)J: Q) ~.... ~ .2E Q) o~EC:""ffio!! Q) '0 ~ ~ 0 - 0 ..c 'O~ Q) Q) E '" o EN~'C3U) ffi e: Q)- e: e: E .<:: zO~~Q:;><O) 8 e:,., 'ffi ...!. Q) 'ijj' ~~ rn ~ a. w... EOc: '" ., Q) ~ We a.. c: ..c.Q o Q) :::I Q) 0 en 0 0:: .- E O'l l!! ,.,e: en .<:: '" .<:: (!).2 ~ en 8'-'0 III =Q) - +-' Q) Q) ..0 c: "'e: Q) Q) - @) >. e: ...J 1::._ U) .... co en .<:: :::I", 0 '" .<:: en ~C1)>mQ)Q) 0._ - II: en Q) e: e: .2~ ~ e:~ -'" '0 $:l"l!!..ce:.<::]1 ~ Q)~ 0 Q) en ..... Q) Q) -'0 .e Q) ..c:: 'S: Q) en l!! <tloxQ)15~ :l" en_ ~~ Q) '" e: Q) O'l t) fUV5 19 ~ ~ ~ '" Q)o ,., C. c: 0 '0 E ~ c. m~ :c ~mz~ -'" ..c:: <.J ~ Z 0....."'0"0= Q) 'c '" ..... Gl '" ->-Q)cooc:o> 0 Q) e: 'S: c: :2 to Q) 0 <.J ...., <(-cEm.....m'- lE e:._ 0 ",e: ~ 0 ...J "00= c. e: oW (9$~ene:Q).!!! ~ O~~('t) en ~ <( OmID!... E';:: en III u - l!! Q) CD 'S: M '" .. C"~.-"O c>Q) , !(> Gl E oW F E >- co t:: "en - ..c -.<:: Q) OONW<D Q) 0-. E ..c Q) m... .<:: "'0 <<Iv(J)T'"" e C ~ :::I ~$~ g.&$E III 0'- ~ ..c::'VOLO (!) l'lI .. (/j Q) 0'<:: UT"""C::<D LL (/j ~ >- .....~ ..., c. James Lehnhoff From: Sent: To: Dwight Peterson [d.m.pete@comcast.net] Wednesday, September 05, 2007 1 :48 PM <james.lehnhoff@ci.arden-hills.mn.us> <sj harpstead@comcast.net> <david. grant@ci.arden- hills.mn.us> <holdenbj24@aol.com> <franh116@aol.com> Arden Plaza Subject: Greetings from Dwight and Marion Peterson, residents of Arden Hills #3 since 1953, residing in the same home we had built for us. We continue to enjoy the charm, beauty and sense of community that exists, even as we launch a new era of growth and improvement. The present council has been alert to the city's needs - some old and some new - and has aggresively taken the lead to address them. We are writing each of you to address an issue which, in many respects, relate to all of the above. The proposed changes requested by the owner! leas or of Arden Plaza are inappropriate and unreasonable. We do not need a Walgreen's, CVS, or any other "chain" pharmacy in Arden Plaza. The Arden Plaza Pharmacy and Gift Shop has served residents for many years with quality products, outstanding service and personalized attention. The staff is competent, caring, friendly and is an independent business that should be welcome in our community-oriented city. It hardly needs mention that Target and Cub meet the "chainll requirement. Furtherl why an ALDI grocery? It doesn't seem to fit the shoppers in our community or even surrounding area, and we are well served by Target, Cub I and Byerly's. We urge you to review these requests in three ways: need? Is it practical? IS it fair? Is there a Thank You. 1 - "-< o - Q) ~ ~ ci> c: :;;: ~ '" a. .<::; C> :J 0 c: '" - 0 c: .!!l l!! '" .<::; - '0 c: '" ~ 0 c: '5 0 '0 c: '" .!: '0 c: :J e '" - '" C> .9 - :; (.) IE '0 .!!l o/l ~ c: :;:;- W '" :;; Cii '0 c: a. N Il:: .... '" I"- '" ~ '" <:'! a: (.) () E ~ c: o/l 0 ~ '" (.) I"- 'E ~ @) 0 ~ -.-.-.-. 0 (tJ(tJcuco '" N E c: N N N N -'" rommm 0 u) '" .9 a: a: a: a: e! 0 c: C> ~ ~ '" c: c:: c:: c:: c '" l!! 'x Q) (J) Q) Q) '" .0 C> '" "E"E"E"E -'" E ~ ...J ~~~~ 0 e! .l!! c: .E.E:.f:.f: a. 0 '" l1= ~ -'" '" .E (.) UJ(/Joooo '" UJ 0 if: c:c:c:c:: -'" .<::; ro e! Q)Q)QJQ) 0 ,.:; c: ~~~~ It: e! '" .<::; '" - N '0 '" 0 .<::; C>C>O>O> ~ 0 '" '" ...J a. (.) ~~~~ ~ -= ~ '" '" e :J 10 C c: '" a. E '" 2:> '0 l1= L... L... I.., L... '" -= '" ~ E 0 0 .9 .g.g.e.E c: .z Gl <!l '" z .<::; m(3:2 ....I -, c: >- mmrom .;.; .<::; ~ UJ(/)CJ)UJ E ~ '" t'- Ul (J '" 0000 't: 0= 0 Gl E .. ...J .!!l a. a. a. a. :::J"C.J: 0 E .;.; :s' eeee ()a.c: C:! c '" l'lI e .. ~ " '" l!! a. a. a. a. 2:>'" '" l() .., LL l/l l/l E '" 0000 m~"E C:! '" .<::; ...., 1- zzzz <!l,,~ 0-. John Michels 908 W. County Rd. C-2 Roseville, MN, 55113 6514846437 s=(". C[t~f ','('I. C_d.' Arden Hills City Hall 1245 VV. Hvvy.96 Arden Hills, MN, 55112 Ref.: Proposal of a Walgreen's in Arden Plaza I hear that some changes might to make at Arden Plaza. While I am not a resident of Arden Hills, I do use the businesses in that shopping center a lot. I would like to voice my reasons for apposing any major changes. We have 3 drugs store within a block, right now, Target, Cub, and Arden Drug all service the area. Propose changes will make parking difficult.. Only two reasons, but good ones. Thank you, ~ John Michels ...... <<-< o ...... " ~ iO-. - '" c u; '" o E o o @) 1::> '" '" U; 0- ~ '" ..c: 'in' ~- c ... <f) '" o E 8 @) Ol C :::J g E '" :2 > q; .:g It: o .r:: c .r:: GI ..J III GI E III '"") E _~C;E o 0 'm T'"" ~ E I'-- (5 '" (5 0 co ~ ..c: 0 @) 1i: @)"'<O c <.0 T""" c: OaT'"" Q) rJ) I... ~ "E '" '" C E q; l!:! ..c ~ 0 ..c: E ~ '5 2 It:o'~ "'5 ..=.. a. m C '" ~ @) o (f) ..c 'I:\t (J) >. Q) N Q) ro -.J E ~ E m ~ "5 E ~ ~ a:: I- -, J:: E .;..: o c ~ '" u.. Ul .;..: u '" :5' ~ 8 Jl ~ ...; " 1:1 " o OJ) .S g: ~ <0 ~ P:: ", .g <. '" -M] e ", o ", <t:: .S: "i5.. 0.<:: .@ ~ '" " .~ .... "OQ.. OJ)!:l .S 0 -'<...... a;...... ~ ~ (l.r t.S SG' " <0 ~ ~ ......<:: -SiO-. ~ ", " " ~~ ~ 0 ",- 0-,< "0 al ~.D ;.:::: 0 ~ ~ ~ .E <f) '" c. C o 'iij C '" 0- X W v.i=: ~ '.;j " '" ~~ ~ ~"' t.S [) .!!l ~ :-= 0 :r::r: ", " ~ ", .~ is > .~ - o ~ '" !il " >> ", " > ...... " '" @5'n "0 ::l ~:r: .DE gl"O ..<:: ~ fs ~ o ~ ", o .~ '" ~ ~ " -M =a .... <8 '" " iil '" ...; .~ " 01:1 S 8 <0 OJ) ~.S E5g: ..<:: . '" ~.~ 305 .... .... ~<8 ~iS " .... -'< " ;.:::::"9 '" .S 8 1! 0 o OJ) - ", ~.;) .~ .D OJ)", <0 ~ >>- .DQ.. "0 ", " 0 .....~ ~ ~ o a Q..x .... " " " ~<'=i " .... .D " 00:"9 '" '" 1:! 8 .~ 0 ~ ~ .D 0 ~~ e g '" >> - " ~~ "0 " ",~ ~ . <0 S " " ~ ~ o 0 _ 0 "1a ct$ 2 "<::OJ) "0<<-< "3 0 o " ~.D " 0 ~~ o '" - '" '" II "S S ", o .~ '" .~ o o OJ) .S g P, !:l o >> ..<:: .~ '" s " o ", o o " '" -M " !il ..<:: '" E " " <t:: - " ~ " '" <0 " P:: '3 o >> ~ E5 '" 1:1 " "0 .~ '" " .... ", '" 0- 00:;::: &l:r: ....:i ", ", " ~~ "dll ~ S ~&: " > ~ " o tE o @ q:: o '" 8 o ~ e o <t:: ~ o e @ " - .~ '" .D " ~ '" '" " .S '" ::l .D - a; e '" ~ gj p;.. <0 d) c:l r-- o o !::! or) !::! 0-. 09/07/2007 00:21 9529153034 --.-.-. 'wd: (no subject)] Subject: [Fwd; (no subject)} From: Rob Boeck <robb@nicolletinvest.com> Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2007 11 :57:01 -0500 To: james.1ehnhoff@ci,arden-hills.mn.us ______ Original Message __am Subject;(no subject) J)ate:Fri, 07 Sep 2007 11 :42:35 -0500 From:Rob Boeck <robb(cqnicolletinvest.com> Organizatilln:Nicollet Investment Management CC:iames.1ehnoi'l:@ci .arden-hills.mn.ns, siharpstead(cqcomcast.n~ david.grant(a)ci.arden-hills.mn.us, fran! 16(cqaoJ .com My wife and I, as well as most of our neighbors, are very concerned about the possibility of increased. traffic loads should the Walgreens and related retail complex be built in the Arden plaza area. There are already severe traf;F.ic proble:rn5 Ln the County Road E!Lexin~ton. corridor and extends north to 694 and east as far ,>s old Snelling. We are not against progress and change... we are against traffic congestion a,nd inconvenience. G. Robert and catnleen M. 1194 Edgewater Av. W. Arden HJ.lls, MN ~5112 Boeck 10ft PAGE 02 9/7/2007 12,tO PM N 4-< o - 0) OJ) Cd p... It: o .c c .c GI ..J Ul GI E ell .., ~ :2 <> <.: ci 0) o " ~ 0 @;:: ~ 0 o 0 o N ~ f;::! ci III <5 ~ 0::: Ol ~ VI W c: ~ E -e 'E.l!!'5<.: >.g-~.S wE (JJ "53 ~ 5 ~ ~ ~ Q) -g ~ OJ ~ ~ .!!l ~ .;..: ... E.;..: .. c :c ~ ~ ~ ~ t- o o N o - .,.; g. r/). ... ~ E:: ~p o'~ ]~ O).~ ....:i::r: '" .: 0) 0) ]~ "-' J 0) ....:i ~ [il 0) o " ! .: i .~ >< 0) ....:i "" @ ~ "" Cd ~ ~ o U .: o 0) ... o ~ '" '" .: 0) 0) ... OJ) ~ Cd .s OJ) .: .~ l'l. 4-< o t) 0) l'l. '" 8 l'l. 0) ;9 ::; o ..g ] JJ 1ii '" '--' ...... <Ii 5 /:l o <.) <<l ..... 0) i) '" 0) ] ...... C;>O) f-<;9 o 0 . ;> ~ 0) ~ il S ~ ;:> '.p o 0 OJ) ~ '" .: OJ)"'0 .S 8- >< <.) Cd 0) 0 '" ....:i ~ 0) 00)~ '+-':0 +-> $-; '..-l ...... 000..... ~ ~ "," "" l'l. 0 Cd .: ;>., o .=:l4-1 ~~o VI"" >.0 Cd '\:J'S 0) '" <<l -a o '" u...... tr.I o.-=: [il ~ "<.) .: .: 0) 00- bhg< OJ).:0 .~.~ ~ .a....:i 0) ~ .: [il "'30(1) <.).J:i ... !+::t::Q) "-' .J:i :.ao~ Z~ .;!l ~ "" t +-> ~ = 0 ~ O)~~ ~~~ .s Ii: ~ 8;"" 0 o @ ~ ..d rT1.:!::: r/).......'" Cd --g S 1;1 o.~ E::~"" .:p.;!l O).:~ '"tj :::1'..-1 Ij 0 " ""u 5 O).:~ -Sogf bO.t:: '>( .: U 0) ..... ....., ~O)...... .~ :::I 0 ~o~ .;>.,.: OJ)4-< 0 .:......~ ';:: "..-1 ,nS>< .0) ;:::::: P-c 0 .", 0 ~ ::;<") ~ ~ .. .: .....V) Cd <.) "" Ii: S @ '" Cd 0 .l:l~ ;>., _.:4-< ~O)...... 0) 0) . ~ t 0) ~ " @ <.)~- .s ~ s O)s.a ;9 ..= "" '" 0) .: .~ S ~ -0' O"'~ Z.t::~ ] '" 0\ ~ ::r: .: o '" .: 0) ~ OJ) ~ .s "" El o [il '" .~ ~ .: .s ~ '" 0) gf o <.) 0) ;9. ~ 5 ....::0 o 0 o ... ....:il'l. .0) ~.s ~~ .l:l '" JJ ~ ~~ 0) Cd ~;9 0) '" ... .: /:l 0) .~ 0) ;>.,50 g~ - ~ 0) ::;;9 '" ~ .: '" 0) '" 0) '--' "''0 OJ).: <<l", ~ .~ ~ ",.~ Cd.J:i .J:i0J) <.) '" iil,s ~<<l .s " ",--g 0) 0 ~~ _ 0) - tli:-;::::: gft: '.-l ~ :g.: ~c3 0) ;9 .s .s Cd 0) ... <<l '" 0) '1 .J:i l'l. 't OJ) ~ "" @ '" ... 0) "" s r/). "," .: 0) 0) ... OJ) ~ .s - <<l ~ .... o o ....:i 0; ~ '" :.s .s ;>., <.) ! -a .: 'OJ .J:i <.) <<l .: o ..= g 0) OJ) [il - ~ @ "" 0) 0) .: ~ o "" E Ii: '" .~ No; o 0) Z [il >i:i --g ~ ~ o U ] .: ~ .s >< 0) ....:i 4-< o Cd 0) [il 1 0) OJ) 0) ;9 .: .~ "" 0) ~ <.) o - i ~ <<l VI 0) 'g ~ -a 0) [il OJ) .: .~ o - ;s 0) t:: ,-.. 1ii 0) '" CI ~ :::8 ;>., ,n 15 !:I OJ) l;:1 '" 0) ~ ~ '" :.a '-' '" ~ 00 ~ '.-l Q) rn..- S - O).s ~ 's 11 0\ . t"'-- l'-- V) N M ,00 " gf .~ - - 0) .: r/). "" @z u" ;> --g~ '" OdOO\ ~00);>., pi~ ~ rg El'~ 1l ~ ~8~~:E ~,.....;o\l.r)l.(j C\SO("l')("f')["--. ~"'t-"'O ?---("'\I- VI '" ~ 0) 's 11 "'00 ~- N' " '" O\'t l?ll li:r/). tb8 ~:E~ ""t-o ;>.,<") 0 ':00\ r/)._N t- o o l::l '" l::l 0\ M <.., o M '" ~ p.. :i ~ <:: o ~BO '" <:: ~.~ f-<'" 1-<"'" "'0 g.:i5 lflC') '" '" ~ 'S '" >-. <..) . ~] ~ ~ <:: <:: '" 0 "0 .~ "p.. <>:; "" .<..) '" '" .~ '" ~ I-< .~ 0, ~ oj ~ti.i :?; .E; >-'''' g ~ ~ 5 ..r:::<i:: p.. 0 <:: 5 '" >-. "0 '" ..< [J ",..r::: ~ :?; '" '" ~ <:: .~ ]-5 . I-< >-.'" ~ ~ ~~ .g.-;'j <:: '" .~ .-'< oj'~ -5] til . <:: S O.~ .~ ~ '@j [J oj -;'j ~ o.~ g] 01)0 <:: ~ .~ '" "00, "0 oj ~ g"iil ..r::: <..) ~ '" oj I-< '" '" ~ [J '" s .~ 0 .st; I-< ::l <8 <..) ~ '" ~ t) [Ji :t:: '" '" <..) .n .~ oj e '" '" .n", ~ '" '" ::l a 0- ~.~ [J oj -;'j~ >-."0 ].~ lflo, ~ .~ '" '" :s 01) <:: ] '" I-< I-< <8 ~ ~ t"- M ~ '" '" ~~o >-.0 .0'> (l) U en v ~ .;:: .zJ '? ","508 "'S'=@M ~rJ)o~ ::E-q-Z", <Ii '" ~ <..) :.a ~ '" ;. .~ j oj .s '" '" <..) :8 ~ ti 01:1 "0 '" ;::u ~ 5 oj ~ <"'0 o 0 1:1~ o ::l <l::< .sg ~~ 11l;... !3 '" ~-;'j ~.t:: ~.;!i p..> t"- o o l::! '" l::! 0'> James Lehnhoff Arden Hills City Planner Sept. 10, 2007 Dear Mr. Lehnhoff: Earlier today I sent you an email but I don't always trust the system so I am also mailing this note. I just heard about the prospect of putting in a Walgreens store on County Road E and Lexington Avenue. I have several concerns. NO.1 is the increased traffic it will bring. Exiting the Arden Plaza Shopping Center is difficult turning on to County Road E or to Lexington Ave. Try it some time between 4 and 5:30 p.m. If you exit on County Road E and want to turn North on Lexington, it is almost impossible to cross over to the left-hand turn lane. If you want to exit on to Lexington, it is difficult to turn left, and if there are a couple cars ahead of you, it takes a long time. Adding a large store such as Walgreens will only increase the traffic. Look at the congestion there is around the Walgreens on Hwy. 96 and Centerville Road, although it is not just the Walgreens that causes the problem. No.2 is why do we need another large national chain pharmacy in this area. Look at all the Walgreens, Snyders and Target pharmacies already in the area. The following are pharmacies already located in the general area of Lexington and County Road E: Walgreens 1601 County Road C and Snelling 1739 Lexington Ave. N. 2635 Rice Street 1075 Highway 96 2.95 miles (distances figured by MapQuest) 3.7 miles 4.7 miles 8.59 miles Snyders 1037 Highway 96 2900 Rice Street 2.45 miles 4.18 miles Super Target 3800 Lexington Ave N. .5 miles Surely there must be a better fit for this area than adding another national chain pharmacy, and leave Arden Pharmacy where it is. Arden Pharmacy provides a unique service where customers receive personalize attention, unlike the bigger chains where you often are just a prescription number. ~~ 4 Summit Court U North Oaks, MN 55127 651-204-6490 Dear Mr. Sand, I am the owner of Hair Expressions in the Arden Plaza. I had previously written a letter in support of the renovations of the Arden PI~a. I listened in on the last Planning Commission meeting and heard one of the members say that the parking lot is usually quite full presently and especially around the lunch hour. I strongly disagree and I had mentioned in my letter that the mall parking lot is so bare that it looks "not worth going to" for new customers. Weare there every single day to see this. I have enclosed pictures of our lot between the hours of 12:00 - 2:00pm on different weekdays. You can clearly see that there is plenty of parking available. Please share these with the other members of the Planuing Commission. Thank You, D' Ann Bagan Avd-e.J\ ~} Cl 7lL- 9!J6!() 7 ~!vvz' ~~/ .~ 01-n ~ #u--- NYLO~ 0~ /. ~~ vk~ fJ ~.. ,C) 'I-d--e- - < ~ . ~~~- t/r, .~ ~. It:: Un I!-o 1M qf' ~9~dus~~ ~~./> . ~ ~ 7-v~ fUt~ 00/~. ~ 177c::LLL ~ o 0!!: ~ ~;fA-~' -Iv !o-oyry ~-v /~~-~ o ~ Q/yyl 0./ ~ ~0.~ /0 . ~. = .S!;:;::~~. ~. c;5 fJI/rY) ~ WUV~. ~-evu~'~ /}/W-T- ~ We. 'fo 1ft,U~ d ff~ ~;:;;;~ . kwYn ~~ rrtz ~ ( UlwJL ~~ ~ 7iVz @' on. . ricK ~ . ~ ~ -4/n ~UIW )~) fr/C~ (}~;JJ: ';;;:A f!:E . ~~ ~d~.. 'f~ - o. 1O~gti), ~ ~ . :.~-~~ . . '~? /JJ.o Lux- ~ . yQ ) , J- ~. bn ~dd-~~ 'r 0~ ~> !LuJ1 '7 . t;j C2vrvl ~. . ~ ~ ~~6 1 ~ f!ilcvz y:-o ff~ (f~,' ~~,~ . '~Lr; r;ud -t~ fi--~ . , Q/( ~ ~ '0t ~( 9? .~. d 90:~ R!!d! ~ ;lexi Oh~ ~ ./ . uy\ '-L/ ~ cA~r~ ~ ---n-t~;:r ?'n~, ../&-. iiX~y UJrV2~~ ~, ~ ~':r 16 ,( fn!6/.e-.nc4 fJ Ilj~ .:J / W'Y''0'h . k-e1?iJu~cJ CR~~ ~ ~~f~ .~ :Iv B ~ ~at/s OJ) C!o tecl C!...- ./ ., ~ < '~sl . . {J~~, ,,~u~ . , . \j~ ~ (p6f~ ~0-~ . ~ Y-twl{~ . ;//&. Lf;6 f1 f+;l:~ Vi ~ ~- (b?iJ 033- 3R-Sj September 11, 2007 Arden Hills Planuing Commission Arden Hills City Council I read in today's issue of the Shoreview Press about the proposed redevelopment of Arden Plaza. I want to go on record as opposing the addition of a Walgreen's pharmacy as part ofthat development. What we do not need in the area is another big corporation Walgreen's to supplant the independently owned Arden Hills Pharmacy. The current pharmacy has served the area faithfully and does not deserve to be dumped. I care about the personal service that the Arden Hills Pharmacy provides. I can go in just about any direction if I care for an impersonal "big box" drug store. Please do not remove our tried and true pharmacy. There are pharmacies in both the nearby CUB and Target stores. Why duplicate those? Instead, I would welcome, and believe it to be a tremendous asset, if a Trader Joe's would become part of the proposed complex. This is an extremely popular grocer/market that would bring in fur more customers to this complex than a Walgreens. It would be an asset to any shopping area. I have hoped there would be a Trader Joe's in the area for quite a number of years; since I shopped in their Tempe store several years ago. I now must travel to St. Louis Park to their very popular store and have even suggested to the manager there that they locate a store in the north suburban area. The popularity of Trader Joe's is evidenced by the always full parking lot at their location in St. Louis Park. If you would check with that store manager he would verifY that statement. I believe we need a market of this caliber in our area The only grocers that approaches this is Byerlys and Kowalskis. Both of these are at least five miles from high-end shoppers residences. ~ Frances Kaliszewski Frkalis004@iphouse.com To: Arden Hills Planning Commission 1245 W Hwy 96 ArdenHills MN 55112 From: Ann Dehn 960 Carlton Drive Shoreview MN 55126 651-484-1686 adehn@att.net To Whom It May Concern: I have just received the September 11, 2007 issue of the Shoreview Press and read the article about the proposed Arden Hills Shopping Complex redevelopment. As a Shoreview neighborhood resident for the last 31 years I feel compelled to comment on the proposaL While it is certainly fine to update the shopping center itself, I am very concerned about the addition of "big box," corporate retail. The community flavor that our family has enjoyed over time and with the small-town close-knit feeling of the present center seems in jeopardy, and that concerns me. In fact, the development of that scale seems incongruent with what I think of as "Arden Hills." This said, I also need to mention that Arden Pharmacy is our family pharmacy. In raising two children they have seen us through everything from strep throat to acne with sound, caring advice. In fact, I have said that I have received better advice from them at times than from our family physician. Giving up that "hometown" caring would be a loss to our family. I do not deny developers their right to make money. I do feel, however, that it should not be at the expense of the community. Please deliberate this decision very carefully. Sincerely, .. +~ James Lehnhoff From: Sent: To: Subject: Rolf Huss [rolfhuss@yahoo.com] Thursday, September 13, 20077:48 PM sjharpstead@comcast.net; David_Grant; holdenbj24@aol.com; franh116@aol.com; davemcclung@comcast.net; James Lehnhoff My opposition to the Walgreens Arden Plaza proposal Hello, I've recently retired after 35 years of teaching (30 Minneapolis Schools/5 Anoka-Hennepin Schools) and have lived in my house in Hunters Park since 1985. I just became aware of the Walgreens proposal for Arden Plaza and hope it's not too late to express my opposition. If I'm remembering correctly, a few years ago the city council rejected a Walgreens proposal for the Holiday Inn corner of Lex./E. and I commended/appreciated that action. We already have a Super Target and a Cub. A Walgreens can only offer us seriously increased traffic congestion and the possible loss of the Arden Plaza local/small businesses we daily depend on and are blessed to have so close by. ..ACE, Arden Drug/P.O. service, Star, Kim's, Nu-Life, etc. Thank you for considering my concerns, Rolf Huss 1132 Benton Way home: 651 482-1257 cell: 651 285-4549 Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect. Join Yahoo! 's user panel and lay it on us. http://surveylink.yahoo.com/grnrs/yahoo-Fanel_invite.asp?a=7 1 ("ol <,.., o - '" ~ ~ Q) c 1ii rl E o " @ Cl C ::J 1J E Q) > '" '0 E 8 '5 '" @ (!) ~ ~ .r::: c e! - E ~ '5 '" @ '" N :0 c Q) '0 '5 .r::: en ::J c E :E , c Q) E "! '0 @ 'E e! Cl -0 'S: '" '0 It: o .c c .c ell ..J li'l E III .., .... Q) c :a: 1ii 0.. '" r-- " '" E ~ 8 'Er--@ o 0 '0 " 0 '" N Q) 'en LD- (j) E T'"" e- o CD ~ ..c .0 "w @ E '" t-- Q) ~- N Q) a. 0 co en Q) .c a: '" en C ~ :>."ffi ~ '" ...l :J: Q) '0 U) (J) L... Q) c: 0'" ::J E Q) 15 co "E ~ en ...., <( .;.; " E';'; Q) c :.6' e CD 0 ::I LL. III I- III '" N '" c: .!!! :J: c: Q) '0 ~ <( - o ..... c: Q) E a. .Q Q) > Q) '0 Q) ~ '0 Q) Ul o a. o ~ a. Q) .r::: ..... c: o Ul ;: Q) 'S; >- E Ul Ul Q) ~ a. x Q) o ..... Cl c: :p 'C ;: E '" "0 .~ .Q-z ~..... Q) ::J 0.0 Q).r::; E Cl :j:i :J .....0 '" ~ .r:::.r::: .......... Ol>- c: :5 'C E ::J ~ 0", ..r::: Ula. Oc: OOQ) en '0 .....~ Q)<( .......... '" '" ~ffi .r::;Q) .....c: ~'Ul c: ::J ,_ .0 Ul 0 >-'0 U 0 "'..... E'O '" Q) .r::;::J a.C: c:i:i Q) c: ~ au ~ <(Q) -> 0'" Ul.r::; ~ Q) E~ .8;:: ~.~ u iiJ c: ~ Q) 0 Q).r::: .oUl Q)'O > c: '" '" .r::; , Q) Ul ~1: Ol :>"$ =I E c: ~o u ~- ::J '" AU. o ' ...~ V).- V) UlI c: o c ~ -", Q) '" 'OQ) Ul ~ ~ "'<(- __0 '" 0 ~ Ul Ul Q) 0......0 o.C:E o Q) ::J 5.:2 c ...g}ro c: ~ ~ ~ c 0 ~Q)- ::JQ)'O U.o 0 Q) .- ..cWQj -l-I~o. Q).r::: Q) ~ Q) E .....~:o ~ ~ '" E ~ '" .r::; a. c: Q) '0 ~ <( '0 c: ::J .E Q) > '" .r::; ~ Q) E :p c: Ul ..... c: o a. ..... c: Q) ~ ~ '0 ..... '" Ul c: o :p a. 'C U Ul Q) ~ a. ~ ::J o c: o Ol c: :g en c..!: OJ .!d .~ C. ..... :p c Q) ,- o.Ul E c; 0:::: u..... Q) Q) c:o. o E '08 ~ .: '" Q) .r::;.r::; ..... ~;: Ul 0 Q)- 'OQ) "'.0 U ~ ~ 0 OlO..... c:;: '" 'u.j..l~ 'C ti 1: 0..",Q) OJ 0. ti .;:: w'Vi :!:..cc ..........0 Q) Ol U o.c: E .- Q) o~.o u~.8 ...; Ul ..... Ul 'u '" E ~ '" .r::: a. Q) .r::; I- ...; Ul 'u '" . E..!!! ~.o ro.!!! .r:::- o.~ Q) Ul .r::; .- ..... Q) E .~ e ~ - Q) 'O~ Q) Q) ,~ ;: Q) c: ~ .Q ~..... c: '" o E .- ~ iU~ E .!: ~ .E Q) c:.r::; ._ I- Q) c: fi ,Q tit) ::J Q) ~ ::J .....0' Q) >- ;: c: Q) '" ~"'" Q) (/) .r::;", ;: 0 >-..... U E '" 0 E'O ~ Q) '" Q) .r:::~ 0.- '" Q) ......r::: "':::; ~~ ,Q Ul ll::.....>- to .9- ro .....~;: (f}~ro to ~ OJ U a. > :i:iL,.rtJ ::J::J.r::; Q) 0 Q) u..... '> '" Q) '> E Ol'O ~ c: '" Ul '" .r::;::J 0..0Q) Q).....E :O~~ :Em> Ol~.o "'C &. U) ..!!!E::J ;: .- ;: g .~ 0 ~~~ N Q)g' U.- m w.-..j...I' ...u>w (/) .- L.. OJ ." Q) ~ - '- Ul'" ::JQ) V loI-Vl-'I- E-L,.19o WQ)UlC I E ~.2 "'Oo.j..Jij c"'cQ) '" Ul Q) >-:J._ W _Uc:Ul '0 Q) clO>"O OJ Q) C 0 .- L.. 0 0 a:l9Ul9 ll:: M.tui<6 .!!! I c: Q) "E <( Q) .r::: ..... - o ~ '" a. '" ~ Ol Q) ..... c: c: '" c: '" E Q) ~ E Q) .r::: ..... Q) Q) Ul o ..... Q) "'" :s! ::J o ;: Q) ~ >- U '" E ~ '" .r::; 0.. c: Q) "E <( .r::; ..... '~ Ul '0 ~ '" U ..... Q) Q) E c: '" .r::: ..... Q) ~ o E Q) ~ '" >- U '" E ~ . "'Z- -E. 'c ::J '" E ~ .E E o Ul U 'OUl ~ ~ .... 'Vi ::J ::J 0.0 >- ~ro 2'0 .- c: > '" .~ tJ) E ~ o E c: 0 0..... U Ul Q) ::J '0 U ~~ ..... 'OC: -Q) ~:E ;: gj ..... ~ "''0 :5c: Ul '" Q) Ul Ul Ul Ul Q) Q) c: .!: "U) Ul ::J ::J.o .0 ~:5 Q) 0 .r:::.o ..... o c; c:- .; "C c: :H 'i: c .0", E= Q)\;::: Z32 Q) ::J Q) 0 Ul U o Ul ..... c: . Q) 0 Ul "",Ul'O =oll8 :EoLL ::JU.o 0'- '> E ::J ,><(u ~ - ~ ,0 0 a."'..... o Q) -OlOl Q) c: ~ > .- '" Q)>I- 'O",~ ~..c Q) o aj" Co ....._::J Q) a. Ul "",E>- _",.0 ,ox..... -Q)Q) ::J ~ Q) ~,fE ..... >- . 0 ~Z-c: OJ 'c"C o.::JQ) e E Q) o.EC: Q) 0 '" ..cu= -'-'w\;::: bJ:"'C .....- Ul c: ::J :u .- 0 c: '0 ;: ;: Q) Ul 0Q)'O c: 0 ~ro~ .....- Q)iE~ u~ 0 c:~.r::; Vi:ii~ Q) '0 '" E Ul c: o 'iij 'u Q) '0 Q) .r::: ..... c: c: o :p '" ~ Q) '0 'iij c: o U o ..... c: ..... ::J a. c: .!!! .r::; ..... Ol c: :;;; '" ..... ~ ::J o >- Q) ..... '" 'u Q) ~ a. a. '" :s! ::J o ;: ~ Ul' '0 ~ '" Ol Q) ex: (!) Q)N >..... ,_ L/l oL/l _2 "':E Q) ~ .. (/) c:;: '" Q) 00._ o > C:L/l Q) ~ 0'\ 0 "'L/l.r::; ~L/lUl ..... o o ~ .,., ~ 0\ ..... Ul Q) [Q N 4-< o N v ~ I'l< 'V ~ U ~ 5 <Il <Il V ::E v -B 1;l <Il .~ ..... .~ ;. .~ ..... al - 0 0 0 ] <Il " ~ ..... .8 -B .~ ,.., ~ \D - '" ~ lJ'l r-- '" ] '" '" 00 ~ "<I; g lr\ ,.., ~ lJ'l \D .D 0\ ~ 0 Qj k2 t- James Lehnhoff From: Sent: To: Subject: lerudr@comcast.net Sunday, September 16, 2007 6:46 PM James Lehnhoff; sjharpstead@comcast.net Walgreens at Arden Plaza Please pass on this message to all councilmembers and the planning commission involved in this proposal. As a resident of Shoreview for 21 years, I am extremely displeased that you would consider adding another Wahl greens to our area. Do we really need another one so that there is one every few blocks? Do we really need to drive out a pharmacy that has been in the community for decades (Arden Plaza Pharmacy)? I have had wonderful ,considerate and individualized service at this pharmacy and have been able to find nice quality gifts when the need arises. So instead, we would have another corporate entity that sells more cheap junk that I can find anywhere! Our community is headed toward he same explosion of tacky franchises that seems to be appearing allover, rather than encouraging our local community businesses and neighbors. These corporations must offer tremendous dollars to the community as I can see no other reason for our leaders to be considering such a proposa l. Please reconsider your plans for the site in question. Very truly yours, Jacquie Lerud 209 Lilac Lane Shoreview, MN 55126 1 To: Arden Hills City Council and Arden Hills Planuing Commission Fr: George and Judy Murakami 5621 Heather Ridge Court Shoreview, MN 55126 Subj: Arden Plaza Redevelopment and Arden Plaza Pharmacy Date: Sept. 17,2007 We are writing you to voice our objections to any plans that result in replacing the Arden Plaza Pharmacy with a Walgreen's Drugstore. For more than 40 years, we have been residents of Shore view, residing for many years on Harriet Avenue (just south of County Road E and Lexington) and now in a town home north of County Road I and Hwy. 49. During all of that time we have "crossed the border" into Arden Hills and patronized businesses in Arden Plaza, especially the Arden Plaza Pharmacy. As the north suburban area has expanded and developed, we, along with many of our friends and neighbors continue to trust and rely on the friendly service and expert advice that we have received from Chuck Erickson, Arden Plaza Pharmacy's pharmacist and manager, and his staff. After all of these years, it is one of the few businesses we can go into and have the employees know us by name. Over the past few years, the Pharmacy has expanded its inventory to include a wider variety of gifts, and the postal service is a major convenience that sets the store apart from the nearby Cub, Target, and Walgreen's in the area. Does the Arden Plaza Shopping Center need a facelift? Perhaps, but at the same time, we assume that any revamping also means higher rental rates for the small businesses that are then forced to pass along the increase in higher prices for their customers. For us, the qualities that motivate us to continue to drive nearly six miles to support an Arden Hills business like the Pharmacy have less to do with paint and more to do with the quality and service provided. We hope you will find other solutions that retain the best of what you already have in the Arden Hills shopping complex. Thank you for your consideration. ~~ George and Judy Murakami ("oJ <,.., o - " bJJ OS p... It: o ..c c ..c Gl ...J III Gl E ell ..., I'- o o E N o I'- ~ o '" @ N '<t " o '" a; Z " ~ ~ ::;; a. 0) '" o ~ '" N '" a: " Q) 'E <( ro '" -" Q) ~ Ol 'l5 ~ ~ .9 .<= " Q) 0 ...J :.j::; en 'w Q) 0 E a. '" a. -, 0 ~ ~ Q) .0 E Q) a. Q) UJ ,.:; '" '0 " o ::;; .w " E";'; Cl) c :s' ~ ~ ~ ~ lI:: o .c .2 z Q)~::;; ~ Q) - ooc:Jg Q) c.- E",I roc:::: c: -, Q) ~..2:'"O ::;;0-0: '" ~ Q) '" o a. a. o " " .9 rn E '" Q) .c - '0 o o .c ~ o .0 .c Ol 'Qi " " Q) 'S: ~ o .c UJ , .!!!. I " Q) 'E <( Q) .c - l!! '" Q) >. o '" ~ o ~ .E '0 o o .c ~ o .0 .c Ol 'Qi " '" ;S .5 '0 Q) ,;;' Q) > '" .c a; ~ ~ Q) .<= " '" .0 ~ '" .0 '" '" ~ '" o .5 Q) " '" 0. Q) " o ,5 " o "" '" - '" N ~ ~ Il) Il) " " o Q)..6 Q) "'0 :5:J::t:: c)+-' ..... .t::. :E >. .~ C/) S Q) C ~c .E ::: .2Jo +-' "ffi rnro~.g >-~ .... m >.- 1i) C""C c: 0 0 -g E12 yj 0 ~ m;s~ coE= (,)m(j)(ij Q. C\10.....0 ....m 'O.ca.~:; ~ we:: ~ co mE c: C> +-' ""ffi 0)'- en .J:: 0 mcctlQ) "'C -t:::.a~m ~.::: __Q)"'O~ C VI Ol'" '" 0)"00 Q) Q) 0 OJ o~ C).... o.c 0.:5 ffi g, 0 a. ffi-<-E;: :5' IDc....- -;:g .... ~ 0 l5 m :5.- ~~ :J a. .c--..Qc .0 E"O +-' Dc: 15 Q) -E,~ e c: - Q) Q) .- ..0 ~'Q3.9 a. ,g,e:>.E ~ ~ .t::..r::. C.... "'0 -.oQ) -0 ~ Jg -_>..~ :!:Q)I...Q) S :>Q) - 3=:>:J0l 0 'WcctI__ c.c >0>, ::: (/)Q)(/)'::: O_ m "'0>'00= oL...Q) ......m .... O+:;wCll 15 a.CU:-E-_, ~:5 VI OC>ID ..c: .... o .t::.m.-....:5 WOo Q)......o.. a. _Ol "..........(/)....,0 O ~.... 0 ~ ._oUl~m ~~ .... .c o..c::.r::. .- ':> ... co oJ """- a. .c 0..2 3: :J i:... E co 0 rn Q) c>EJ:: ..c Q.J+-'(fJID 5:-0 .c 'm'- 3=:t:: Q) l/J ro Q)::O Q).... ..... ..... m .c I--o=m :>ctI" cU)......1i) WoE:J:> .9 woEmE .s W~Q)ro 9.!"'E Z .c_ '" ~ Q) "^.... > v. 0- m Q) .... ~.... C . 0 co ~ .~~~~ ~ ~~ ~~f-g~ Ci5 .5!:! .56 _0 >OlQ)c> +-'- O "",Q)>E- c: Q)'ijj'S;:cEw:J Q) C1J J:: C 0)'- E ....Q)'t: c... E<CE:c Q) .........U) Q) a.. ........0'" ~0-Q)rn~.Q83:"'C o co.... O>......c ..... - .... >. c J::.9 ~ 1;) m +-' 0>..... (J) 0 :J 0 0 E ~~~:5 ~ffi~~~~~E~ ~ "" ~"~ ~";: ~"~ . m ~;Q"5 (ij:; m~~.~co'<=" '--~~"-OOO~m ~ ~ -",m~oo~oo..ca..^ a.omc~::J "occ Oca 0 x~o..o 0 =m::J"-ma.~53- ~mmmwca~ mmE~~mo"O~ oO~>m.~~ E~E<tI~:;::J~::J ~-rnm~ 5 "::Jcao~O_E~o crnc~~TIoo~"oomoo_::Jmm~ ~~"~mmE~::J~..c~E~2(ij=m ~'~~~=~a.S_~o~a.cao~~ ~.E. roN"5 .....; ::;; E Q) ~ "0" ,., ~"'.c m-::: ~"~ o.E ~ ~ ni N '" a: " Q) 'E <( .5 '" -" Q) ~ Ol ~ '" :g '5 .0 .9 >. '0 '" Q) ~ ' m~ ~~ '00 ,,- ",g> ~"x " Q) "'~ a..c "'0 Ol.o .~ c ~o "'''' a.N .c.!!! Ola. '" " oQ) 53"E Q)<( .oQ) ~= "'- 00 "'5 ~ 0 Q)'O .c" -Ill 0" ".- ~Ol o"~ ~;: Q)Q) .cOl' wooW .c Q) '0 ~:E ~ ,,"'0:: ,g~~ ~:o c ",,, '" <TIE 0 _"'C) - ~" "~-; 0 ca~>"O ~ rn rn c <tI~~ ca .oq: ~ Q) .c og> ",- ",,, -" o.!!! "a. 'OQ) O.c 0_ .c'O ~" ,gIll .c", .2> Q; Q).o "E "'Q) .5 E ca= E" ~5 "'8 '" w~ - .c ,,- " 0 "':5 Iii';:: ~"~ a..c 0- a.~ .~~ .c", - -Q) 0'" t::'" o~ 2:0. cD ::J ~ E ~JY ~ "," ~ o Q) '" ~o ~ "" Ol ~ c.~ .E ;S 2: " ::J ~oco .co>. m OO'u;~ OOmooc ca >"- m Q) ,- E.c a:lZEf- "'0 EC) co N ~ Il) Il) c cD . o>z .!!!.<(::;; -Q) ,;;,.Z Q) ,,' ::J ""C Q) .:=0::: (ij":; ~CJ:~ ::J ~N 0 oca("')~ >-~coUJ ~ o >. '" ::;; '0 '" Q) ~"E e-", '" ~ I(9 c:!2 '" > -Ill ~Cl C) C) ..... o o t::l l() t::l 0\ N """ o N " OJ) '" p... E 0 0 . 0 . . ell . . ~ . . . . . . ~ . . a. . . :t:: . .c . . 10 . . c: . s: 0> . Q) c: . Q) 'Ow" . C OID- . . I.E13 . Vl ",0:;: . :;... t-- . ell 'OI . .c 0 C:C:~ . 0 . s: ~ ~ C\1 . ~ . Q) <DlJ..D . "" . Q) ~ . en . 0\ James Lehnhoff From: Sent: To: Subject: Jackie Freppert Tuesday, September 18, 2007 8:06 AM James Lehnhoff; Karen Barton; Michelle Wolfe FW: Arden Plaza -----Original Message----- From: Mark E Stange [mailto:mark_e_stange@uhc.com] Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 5:34 PM To: sjharpstead@comcast.net Subject: Arden Plaza I understand the City of Arden Hills is considering a proposal to redevelop Arden Plaza in a manner which would force out a long-standing locally owned business, the Arden Plaza Pharmacy, in favor of the national Walgreens chain. While you are likely constrained to permit the plaza owners the freedom to conduct their business as they desire, if they find themselves seeking any sort of city approvals or concessions, I would really hope that the city would do whatever it could to influence them to keep our local business, rather than force them out. Small businesses have a hard enough time as it is, without city support of national competitors. As a customer of the pharmacy for a great many years, helped on countless occasions by their wonderful people, I do beseech of you. Sincerely, Mark Stange Past President Arden Hills-Shoreview Rotary Club This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately. 1 - ] "-< 0 <a - .~ ~ '" ... gp :i3 A-. :f @ "C '" 'S ~ .D .8 ~ ~ gp~ ~ 'S c.S S oo " '" ~ 0 E .s 0..D " oo '" oo k 0 ;. = 0 '" ~ .S '" 0 ;., ;. "5 ...-.4 ..... "C 0 '" bll ala - "C @ = .D 0 " '" .~ ~ "C ... k 0. CD - o '" . 0 ~ ] ~-S13 ~ 00 - ~ ~ .<:: o l) = " = u~d 0 '" ~ '" .~ "C ......"C'" ... U- k 0. = bll .'~ u 00 0 '" E ~ gf$:l.Q - - ~ '" .~ .D 0 o 0..-1 ::c: ~ _u~ oo "5 " o~~ = 0 ,.g '" '" 0 oo ol ~ '" ..= @ '" '" 0 .D ~ k- oo U .... '" 0. oo tl :a N ] ...c:: ......-! gf E :c' =c:I"C ~ " "'~ = .~ ol Q) 1l '" ol "C ~ ~ '0 .DQ'" ..a "5 - '" "'....:i k U ..= .<:: = ~~~ = E-< .s in '" .~ :J ~ ..=::J ~ oo. a.i "-< "Ca:lo -"i 0 " @>I.l.s u oo E "C 0 = " ~ '" c:l15ol - '" ~ .D oo 0 .<:: ~....:i.b ~ ~ ~ .,!. oo ....:i1! " .~ s 5 - Q) "C <......'" = .~ 'E ~;.E ... ol oo iJ :::E "l ~ Utl -= <Zl "C " ol .~ oo ~ '(; '" ....:i @ ...... @....., oo 0 >I.l 0 o ol <Zl "C A-. - >. ><-..= < " >I.l ... '" ~ u ~.~ -a ...... oo -s '" ol U " ~ <!' j 0+->'- ....., '0 zS~ ~ ... ~ '5 ...... " '" >I.l . ol c-. 0 '0 A-. ::;Zoo", ~ ... .;..; oo ~ ~ 1;) ~ 0 -"i 0 - 0 = u " - '" bll @ "C 0 '" :2 :E A-. -5 +-> 1;) (:: = '" "C <l: (/) >I.l '" = oo '" CD 0 ~ Q) ~.- gz 0 oo fl L() E "a-o::9 - ol U '" 0 0 0 -< 0(1)._ ::c: 0 - bll ~ 0 '" k " A-. @ o.~ .D E-< ... '" I'- .s '" 00 ;. 0 '0 .e3 ';;j 0 '" '" -" 0 "'- .- l::l""" ~ '0 :a = N Q)Q) .8 "Co= ol ... 0 0 -" @ U.S ..= ~ oo >< 05 (/)+-> k .g- " = Q.(/) '" oo k E ~ k '" S ;>"'1"'4 r.n 0 '" 0 k "'0 (;' @ ~.@ ..= ~ H .s ~ Q) ~E '" ~ ~ 0. .0 "5 E (/) 0 E ~.s8. <a k >< '" '.0 k " .s bll '" Q) ~@ '" ;2 .lS ....l 0 @ a. .<:: u ..==bll ~ ... '<::0) a. .b 0 [;' .b - Q) "" ~ ~.S A-. ~ ll: >> en '<:::J Jg .~ oo bll'" o. '" ::<: <a '" Q)- ol .... ca ~ oo "C 0 -'" >; -,0 I "C oo g @ u J! >> ~ ~ tin - = k ..c '" 0 ol < '" '0 (/) E u .~ Q c ;: " ~ <Zl (/) Q) Q) Q) tl :::E ..c Q) Q) E> .-.. .-.. & '0 0 0; - N iJ ...... Gl :J '" '" k ...J f- ...... '0 <l: - S ~ < - <a t-- .;.; < '" "C III " ~ ~ oo @ 0 Gl E .;.; Gl " ol 0 E :c' ~ '" - ~ e c t?- o Ii:: 00 J III .. '" ...... ~ = 1;) l() .., u- cn cn 0 '" ~ E-< '" -s '" 0\ k ;., . ...... ...... .....___._... u___9.--:..L2~J12_ ~.~.~_a-<L~~.0.~. __._....~~u~..e.,'L~L~~~ '~~ ~~~~-- -_~..W.C::".~~-(j3~~~.?_- ..__..'-th....~...~...P-.. .... .u......~~__.... .--fb._.~~~j;g--r. ... .'.'~7'-~J ---W--F~'~".~-~~-- ~~~ __m_~_~ r..~'Ji'--~---- ~~eiVed ....- ~n~~___ ;;< J ~--J:;"_~_sf___ ~. f~_._~-~I.L~ ,_ '5) -- 3 '3 - s-;f;2.. I k>__~____ ...___ ~bH : ~ ~h1:4'1f P~~ff &-?n'n7~'e::n-J ~ cll'dfp ~=II--~ l.a~ 5 ~ cJJ~ghw~ q(, ~ d/~J MN..J .5"SI/..;;J.. ~.hfl,i.-V If, :J..~1 ~ mA/.~~: r A4'"T1 W~lt;to ~ ~ t!#n~ ::r: ~~fVdhu p~-h,,"..G~ ';5'" W~ ~ ~ P~ZfIV. 4- Li:#fv 6~~ ~~/~: :r= u-n a- 'JE ~ t7U W~ ~~t M~ ~~ l' IV ~dd r ~ A~.~. cj/.I?/().e-v~ r. ~~ ..nv r6izM.eVI-uV) ~4--7'!- >r7t:lYe,( ~ ~ >>-~.g~ l' 1111". ~~ ~ ;r-a/L .e-s. ~ HuU:: ::r- ~ /nP';& ~ ~ ~~t" ~v ~ ,/.>~~!. dntJd ~~ ::c: ,/W7I ~ ~/5~~~~/~P~~hd~~ au.. .;J~~. -:r: L ~~ n~~~~,H'~ .f{~A-J~) ~ ~.v~~ />~JtV 7'~ ~t:7. _ c:t.s A/ /.J>~ a~ /1/kc ~kS /lU1:t ~ ~.u:~ ~~ tpt/ &~~!f ';f'~'er}1k..eL) J L thn ~ -;tlwvt: rv~ /de 'f~ 7n~ ;yo~ w~ ~ ~ 7' /0UJ~.~. "IJI #topaa:t:.J ~ ~-G- 7(fuf:. ~(/ A- -r~~d' 1f~ ~ /U ~~ )o/~";"'(f ~~r A:Iz.v ~~~k~....-T zr~ .6u.&J~. ::r:::: "P-7lYJ~ tfV r~~1f ~~. ~ ~ ~) w:vf;/, t:vn ~ -1 A:--S w~ ~ f~~ '-;Yna--n-e.-uy'~ff~t;; ~hn7- ~M~ -;b ~~ -;:/;hu ~ ~ ~ f~ .,..,.~ ~ ......3-Mte;;...J "" d(~~ IW~ ~ Rtf(. Z:. ~ w~. Ilsr ~ ~~_/d ~-1 .r~4 . .x;-~~~~r~W~~.A- ~n) ~~ ~ a. ~~ ~ 'rr7~ ~~ .::tIw -I~ 1 717hW ~e- f~ ~ ~- ~ ~t:rnAt:J~ 'n7&d ~ ~~~. ~~~:r ~~~r~~~~J ~iT P~'7' tp.i;/ u r1~~. x-f-wo~ ,e,.M#1 ~ ~ O'y~ ~ /.iVtY~1 A-n~If.~' -ro ~J.V1-n ;d::-' ~) "X tJ'i-ed".~ ~ ~ ~ w~-#~ tPj ~~t ~~.J ~~;tUt f~~t ~/ ~~~- 4~ ~ tJc/~ '1' -4~~ fMY~ ~ ~ r: ~~ ~ /Jtff7- ~ .:vw ~ '7n~ cr~~~ )D35 zD4-f-WdtTi.R. fty~. SffOR'Z:"\~W MN. .55Ja,<t6-8'n1 0;,7 - -12-1- Jf 33 3 James Lehnhoff From: Sent: To: Subject: lars@ccbr.umn,edu Wednesday, September 19, 2007 3:39 PM James Lehnhoff ARDEN PLAZA PUD Dear James and Planning Commissioners, I can not be at your hearing on 3 October, but wanted to write you about the Arden Plaza PUD. Since the last Planning Commission hearing on this PUD, I accepted an invitation from the development company to discuss my concerns about the project with them. Some have been addressed in recent design changes made to the proposed Walgreens store at the intersection of County Road E and Lexington Avenue. However, one item remains in the proposal that I hope you will eliminate - the monument sign at the intersection. Arden Plaza currently has two monument signs, one at the intersection and one at the Lexington Avenue entrance to the shopping center. The Walgreens proposal has a monument sign at the intersection, plus one at each of the two shopping center entrances, for a net gain of one. Given all the Walgreens signage on the exterior of the building and inside the corner tower, and the elimination of existing/new trees that would screen the site in the future, there is no need for the corner sign. Apparently Walgreens would like a sign that has a changeable message. However, such a sign is not essential to the identification or viability of the store. I know that the Commission and Council are sensitive to the overall look of our only "downtown" area and do not want County Road E to resemble Concord Street in West St. Paul. There are already too many signs on County Road E. With this PUD, we can at least hold the line on one more new sign and the idea that every bit of unused space is a wasted marketing opportunity. Thanks, Gregg Larson 3377 N. Snelling Ave. Arden Hills Gregg Larson Coordinating Centers for Biometric Research University of Minnesota School of Public Health 2221 University Avenue, Suite #200 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3080 Phone: 612/626-9030 Fax: 612/624-2819 E-Mail: lars@ccbr.umn.edu 1 - "'" o - " OJ) '" ~ lI: o ..c: c ..c: Q) -I III Q) E CIl ., Qi e: ... III :2 rl <l: E " o '" o cO @I"- e: a '" a >-N ~ '" a c: N 10 :J ~ ~ ~ ~ e: E Q) ~ 2 tI:: ~ ~g.~:s:ro '" (/) e: Z .<::: Q) >. Q) "'C C m ...J Q) C "'C t/J CI) co ~ Q) 8- N :] E p ::J ..c rn _ (/) f- ...., 0.. .w " E.w Gl I: :c e CI) 0 = LL. (/) f- Ul '" N '" a: e: Q) 'E -< ::: 0.9 s::: !;J " .S 1U.g"Ei too.z .....t:l d..... E-<o'" . C,,) ~ 0 ~(])~... ~-;S .1:: ~ >>~.~ :::,D~() ~13s~ .<1aocn ::: l:lU.5 ..... B .s.::a rn 0.0;::::: lZl 5 Q) 0 (l.) ~..o.t::~ ~:g ~ ~ '" :J 0 OJ) ~ ~ ::::.5 clj ... 'Cd ~ "0 '" il: !;J '9 -;S OJ)"e ,D~:::o o~..9l-c +-' ClJ cd ll) OJO ,D '" ~ ~ ~ 8.~'S ::: 8S""" o..oi!:l-;S '" U::: " ">>::: " g ::: 0 <l::._ Cd C,) 0.1::: 8'~ .'= :g o ""0 il: ::: C,)-d~ -"0 ::: " ::: d " gj " " 8 " > !;J " .... " ~g"g13 a'- '" ~ 8">>0.. -:S+=e.-o ::: ~ ::: 0.." o ~ OJ ...... tho;:;"a s:::oo9 s:r~..... .- ~".I::: u ;::::::: "d ~.S '.p ~'S ~"~ ~ Jj~E::gJ,D +-'25bD~ ;:;'S "0 OJ. () ~ -..';l~ 1il OJ~......p-" "5"'+" 8 !;J. "'" '" " " '" 0 !;J g il: i!:l ::: () o ~.s ,9 ~ u tl r:n.~ l-c ....... l-c Q) "d ..~ "'.- '" "0 ~ ,,~...., ",,D~ .... .::: OJ)80" !:l " .g -;S ::: o g o..-;S 13 ~ 0 Q,)'~ rJ'l " () ~ ... '" ""!:l "i!:l ~0";:O()5 ~~ Q) l-4 ~ ~. o Bc.S tl2.:S ]~~~S" Q) '';::: 0 <<) Q) 1a ....:l.- ~ e e "d . ~ " OJ) 0 0 ~~]~]~ ~ Q) Q) (lj __ 0 "~>",,,'2 g CI p 1il 0 ::> '" !:l 5 0"0 13< .S 1a .;:l '" ,D~ 0._ " g ~ ~ ""::: ~ 0..., ;;>Q)..t:::: .,;":::.a Q) +-'.- 1a ~ t:l .:::~ ~.g " '" "0 .... 2';:; g o8A ,D 0.. '" =ll),.d .~ l;l () ::> () ;:; i!:l""'~ OO+" ~ ~.~ <l:: .- .- e >. ".p g "0 ::: ~ a 8..::: 1>'..2 ~ '" -::: j]~ ~ ~ Q) ::: .... () " 0.. '" "'d ~-a <..:::i!:l JjgS .... 8 ~ o o.~ <+=< '" " " "'>- '" '" 0.. ~..doo Q) '"tj...-t -;S a g a'" - _l;l~ o-'Q);':::: Q) >''0 -;S~~ ""'....- o " '" ~~-;S 0......"0 rn c.E 2 '" ::: 1a S'o -;s",o.. '"d8~ ~.a'i3 ",o..t:> l:l ~ " "O+"> S 8 i!:l 00'" ",<t:: " OJ~~ ~.S ;;. --~g 1:n::: ::: -()!::: '" '" '" .5 e..d ~ o..~ en ::: " " .... OJ) OJ ~ Jj "'" o ::: o 'i ::: o () "0 " '" o 0.. 8 0.. Jj S ~ o - ~ o > ] '" 8 " g o () !:l o o - ::: o .- 1il .... " "0 .- '" ::: o () '" ;:; o .- .... " '" " > .- OJ) ~ ;:; o >> 1il -;S " g. ..::: ~ a ~ !;J z " " ;> "0 " a ]~ .~ ~ <Zl <Zl t"- o o t:! V) t:! '" James Lehnhoff From: Sent: To: Subject: Karen Long [klong3@comcast.net] Friday, September 21, 2007 9:49 AM James Lehnhoff; sjharpstead@comcast.net; David_Grant; holdenbj24@aol.com; franh116 @aol.com; davemcclung@comcast.net Business Expansion on Lexington Ave, and Cty Road E We would like to voice our concerns about the proposed expansion of the shopping center on Lexington and County Road E. We understand there is a proposal to build up that area with a Walgreen's and possible other businesses. We do not feel the area can support the increased traffic. There would also be difficulties getting in and out of the center and NOT enough parking spaces. We are opposed to this expansion as it is presently being proposed. This expansion would also have a very detrimental effect on the long-standing existing businesses that we have supported for many years. Adding another building in the Ace Frattlone parking lot would in our opinion seriously constrain the parking for a very well run, respected, convenient and necessary business. This would also eliminate the ability of Frattlone's to provide a summer garden area that many of our neighbors have used faithfully for years. Plans for a new drug store would displace businesses we have been frequenting for years. IS it really necessary to have a drug store on every major intersection? In addition to the likelihood of the Arden Pharmacy being forced out of business, is the loss of the post office service that they provide. It is very convenient and is used by a very large number of the residents in our area as shown by the steady stream of customers that use the Post Office Service on a daily basis. Please reconsider your possible approval for this project in its present form. Consider the impact on the neighborhood and the long-standing business 's in this center. Be responsible to all. Money and tax revenue are not the end all. Vince and Karen Long 959 Lydia Avenue Roseville, MN 55113 1 James Lehnhoff From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Leslie Reindl [alteravista@earthlink,net] Friday, September 21, 2007 9:57 AM sjharpstead@comcast.net James Lehnhoff; David_Grant; holdenbj24@aol.com; franh116@aol.com; davemcclung@comcast.net Walgreens at Arden Plaza TO all decision makers for the City of Arden Hills: The pharmacy at Arden Plaza let its customers know that Walgreen has submitted a proposal to build a Walgreen store in the plaza. As a long-time customer of Arden Pharmacy, I write in opposition to this proposal, on the grounds that: Citizens across the country are now aware of how important it is to "buy local, II to keep money in the local economy, support small, homegrown businesses, decrease need for transportation of merchandise, and have a local person responsive to needs of the community. Walgreen is a national chain. Arden Plaza has a comfortable, neighborhood look to it--pleasant buildings, beautiful flowers in summer, the garden shop at the local hardware store. Walgreen stores have an ugly chain design in all the stores that I have seen. Such a store will be an unsightly and jarring note at Arden Plaza. Arden Pharmacy already carries much of the merchandise Walgreen sells, and Walgreen will take customers away from a local business, perhaps leading to the closing of Arden Pharmacy. The rest of the merchandise Walgreen sells is readily found at Cub grocery and Super Target, both within three blocks down the street. The United States has been taken over by big-box stores, Walgreen included. They drive local businesses out of business, have questionable buying practices, and some have questionable employment practices. We can do better than this in Arden Hills. I ask that you deny Walgreen permission to build at Arden Plaza. Leslie Reindl 1233 Ingerson Road Arden Hills 55112 1 James Lehnhoff From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Ruth Rolfs [r.rolfs@comcast.net] Friday, September 21, 2007 5:39 PM James Lehnhoff Stan Harpstead Arden Plaza Redevelopment James- As we read the Arden Hills Notes today, we were very sorry to hear about the possible redevelopment of Arden Plaza. We live in the adjoining neighborhood and like the smaller feel of the current complex. We also really like the hardware store and Arden Pharmacy. We would be disappointed to see them replaced. If, however, change does occur, please consider the already congested intersection of County Road E and Lexington. We also think the change from 2 lanes to 1 lane at the Lexington exit of Arden Plaza could be dangerous if traffic increases. Thanks for your consideration- Ruth and Mike Rolfs 1 ~ '<-< o ~ Q) ~ ~ Q) <:: -' en rl E o o @) 0> <:: :J '0 o E Q) > '" '0 E o " o '" @) '" ~ ~ .<:: <:: ~ E o " o '" @) .... N :c <:: Q) '0 o .<:: lI: o .c c .c III ...J III III E III ..., Q) c: ~ ..j...- :;b c:{ ~ 'E ~ <91 ,~ J!! ~"C c: ~ ;: 'S: "a. @)a.!l1 ~ r:: a 1....1 c: o N -m CD ~ ,...r c: E ~ ~ vi g. ~ ~ rl ~ <:: E E ~ o .$ O:t:: I rn c.. 0 0 ~ <:: Q) @) .<:: Q.) (f) "'0 c: co CD",. >. m -ai ~ co 1i.i ...J a:: a;"Ee-mc: :l:o.aroE~ m ..c:: co _ ...J C/) 'ur ...., <( E .w e ; LL Ul .w u .. :s' ~ 8 ~ ~ Q) ..c E Q) :2 '" Q) l!:! > Cll ~ :=:t:: "E, "CCllOl Q).cc .... .- '" ai '" Q) ..... '" OlO..Q1 Ol.... ..c ::1"'_ '" Ol Cll Q) 2 l!:! :5"'Cca -"'", o -Cll.- Q)N:>, U Cll U c 0.. Cll .i!lcE .fa Q) (ij "C"C.c Ol ~ 0.. .5 Q) c ~.c~ ..c......... "CE<( c 0 Q) n:s~..s:: Ol"'.... .5 E.5 ~Q):5 ~ ~.3: cc'2 .- Cll 0 EE~ := >;.i!l := c '{l Q)Cll..c .- E ::I ~...~ ......c Q) o Ol U .c ::1._ eno,,= c..c Q) .- Q) '" Q)>- .~ -Q) .i!l -:='" Q) 0 :=aio. - Q) _ -Q) U ==;;>Cll :C>- ....0.. CCllCll.c Q)-CN- "'C-Nc ;;: (I) '-0. oE .......... 'Officii:=' c:>,,gQ) Q) 0 '" > ..... ..,. Q) CllQ)Q)Ol -.cJEc "'0 __ 101- .- c..... oU.~ Cll 0 ..... LL ."C Q) Q)- ~ . 0 0 $:1::+-'(I) :>,Q)"'Q) EEo== o.::IE .coo-:>, Ol Q):': C ::I> . Cll ,gQ)l!:!E _"'00(1) <(~1i):J .0 C ::I o o "C C Cll ..... o :>, Cll :2 .~ :c c Q) "E <( ..... Cll Q) o c ~ ~'Q) .Q Cll 0 "'Q).... Cll.....en uQ) .....o..ccn cOI--::I Q) - ..... U Cll .0 .~ '- ~ C "CooQ) cu.......U)~ a.>CI)_C) .c"CQ)- ...... "- C) CU ",r3(ijS Q)"CI--Cll "=c....."C Q)CllQ)Q) '" 0. :>,"'::IQ) -<t::enc Q).- (0) 15 .-- Cll c . c Cll c '" "C E.- 0 ~ c '" :>,"C._ Cll_~~"= ",oE>Q) Q.) (])..... (/) "C U Cll . c Cll .-.c c 0 U 0 0. 0 .- Q.) ..c +:i 15.. "0 (,) ca CO'C 0)'-(/)00 Q).Q.- 0 '" :5~€UJ~ ..... ::I ZO -0", Q) '" C:::::I 15 Cll Q) . 'C.. .....a>:5oCl) .E:::oOE \\I..... "'C Q) ~..c: Q) C:!:::: .- 0 == Cll Q) o.!!l E c U .cu ca '+- 0 C -....Q) ....... >- CO 0>._ oQ).ccc ~ ~ <(.~ ~ '- . I c: ::I-'Q)~o oE.....oQ)u Cl)Q)_..c:"'O c::5 cn:: 0 .Q "lii..c 0 .c o..:J:JQ)Q) .- ..... 0 == '" ......... E::I U Q) 0 '" "C .c ~, .c Q)C:_~ c..COCT"""O :=.- c :s 0 >..5 ctJ ocCJ:5<: Cll.- E aiQ)E:=o Q):=Cll~.c .c1..cL......... ",,0.00 Cll"'Cll"liiQ) ..c:Jcncue :>, := .- U ::I uo.cco CllEct:Q)'" ..><: o.c ..... (ij :>,Z Q) ~ .c~Q)E:'O o..l--:5oc Cll o.!: Cll Nui......c_ .!1l"CQ)0Q) 0..0==:;;:>' coE.i!ll(J Q)-'=.....cn "Co~"'Cll ~;gCll~~ Q)C)::JI.,. .- 0-::1 Q) ~~<(.E:5 Q) ..... 1l)0 . .... ~en OlOl c ::I .- ..... =0 Q) cC enQ) Q) "C..... cOl Cllm OS ..... "CQ) C:::.c .... 00 offi c.... o Cll .c "'.... Q) Q) ..... > .9Q) en 'Qi Ol..c ::I.... ..... 0 Oc Co Q)"C l!:! Q) Ol$ ~. ~ :>,....: -eE Cllll) Q) , c~ :>,..... "C::I Cll Q) ~"E -Q) Cllo. ~ ro Cll...J Q)"C ..... C ~Cll ....c '0 "'.... "Cg> Cll.- ..... X .- Q) Q)...J :5c cO 'E -g Q) Cll :t:: ~ -Q) ....: > E Cllll) .c. ....(') "'~ ::IQ) _E.2 _. CllC:::(ij Q)"O~ Q) C Cll '" Cll '" :>,0 :.c: 10-0:: c"" 0 0"-_ 'Ci) ci it:: r30"C U C 0 000 Q) .Ol :=::?Cll ::: E.fa '" c .Q c '0. o ..... ::I o Ol c .;: Q) "C .w C o U "C C Cll Ol .5 "C Cll l!:! ..... .E '" ..><: c Cll .c I-- ~ l!:! Cll ~ o '" '" ::I ..... ~ :;; c c<( o "':>, c..c Q)"C alQ) Cll c .- c ..... Cll o U (9", , "Cl!:! Co. Cll o Q) E := Q) o E ...J~ c o 'w '" 'E E o o Ol c c c Cll 0.. Q) .c .... .c .... .3: '" :.c: .... l!:! Cll .c '" Q) '" Cll Q) 'C.. Q) U c Q) .c Q) > c o U ..... ::I o :>, .... Cll 15 .c c .c Q) ...J ....: :2 '" 0. "0 E - en en ai .... ~ I "0 E - II) C'! CO ~ , .... Q) Z E Cll LL en ::J l'- o o !:::l or, !:::l 0-, - <+-< "'- Ol 0 c;; - .<:: 0 - .<:: - C Q) '" .5 0 ~ c:c:::>' C 1::1 :CtU~ ,Q ~ A.. :=:"'EE 1;) ;: <( ~ Ol .<:: (/JO~ '" ,2 .91 +-' a. C .<:: 0 0", 0 ;: '" C C - E'" Ol 0 vi Ol Ii: C 1...<tl"E C Iii m1i.i<( ~ Ol -a.ctI..c - ~ '" Q)~:!:::: 1::1 '" 0 Ol ~ E Ol1::1 ;: I/) 0 ~ Ol I/) '" 0 =..000 ~ '" @ Ol1::1 Ol 0 ~ _ C :g '" m :::l'Ci) ,5 C Ol 0 :::J Ol '5 :::J ~;:..o ..0 (3 .<:: Ol",,,, - .9 0 -5 Q) C . I/) E l....- 'U I/) - Ol meaDO ~ I/) Ol > ..c (/)"0 0 1::1 :::J '" +-'.__..c 1::1 ..co= 1::1 CT ~-c:Q) '" ~ E co 0 o.~ Ol Ol ;:- - I/) 0 co U)~.= '" .<:: 0 C ~ Ol Ol - 0 ~Q)Q)..c C. C OlC- ~ '" ctIl...Q)..... J1 @ ::J.QJC)o 1::1 <0 o m ~ J: C ~ >-$:g '" ~ ~ ~ro=:== C .a ::c Ol C ~ oun ;: 'E :::J ~ .E:5~ ~ <( 0 >- u.. - - -"'0'- 0 0 '" E -' <( ;::!11 I/) .<:: - 0 c:~g~ 'E ,!!l ~ Ol >- 1::1 Ol 0 E o.2? L... 1::1 "" a.cu>'::J 'iij I/) '" '" @ gE=o ~ Q)L...E>. ..,. ilijgJB Ol <( N = :c' "'Co. >.0 C mc:~..c:: Ol <Ii Ol NOl 1::1 1:: I/) 1::1 ~"Es.,;ffi Ol '" 0 a.<(..8:::J I/) ..0 ::c ~ x c"'C..c:: 0 Ol .l!l .;..; wce>>. :1:" C "E m 'w Q) OlE c;; ~ ..o.!!! <(IDC:O 0..0 .~ (9 Q) 0)..... \to"- _0 Ol I ..c:l...ctlW ~ 1::1 _mW.c -lji0- E 'S: cl- 6>cn '~~ E ...: '" '00 CD rom 0 ,gJ a c: Q.-c ~ :::J~ 0 1f ID:::Ic:a. 0_ '" '" ~Cf) co 0 >-1::1 E E C 0) ~ (I) L... :=1::1 -' -..c (I) 0. .'" .g I/) ~ I/) ~:::JOlOl "'>- :c rl - <( ().f: -= Ol- Ol ~ C :::J C N E ro.!: ~..c:: '" 0 C 0 ..,. 0 - ---..c...... Ol1::1 Ol C E iO 0 !!f Ow .~ .<::- > 0 @ ro-og!-c _:::J ~ '" 0 I'- Ol cO ~ 0 0 1::1 - C ~ ~~ ~ ,- ;: C . 0 '" C C Ol- ~ Ol (5 Ol Ol '" g-a:: 2i tv ~'" '" 1::1 . N . E 1;) E a:: 0.<:: Ol 'iij . Cll ..,f c.~Eg -- 0 0- 0- 1/)_ .9 C . J N ~ 0 1::1 mCaQ 0 . ~ '" Qj C ",C .?;> 0 . 0 ~ .<:: '" ..c:]oo :::J Ol . Ol 'iff > - O'U i::'- ~ E '(3 :2 . '" ..0 Ol ~ c: () c: OJ 1::10- . @ E 1::1 Ol :E . li:: Ol ;: 1::1 '" > ~ 0 . -:-: .$ Ol ..0 o cm <LJ Ol- .<:: '" . a. z 0 0:: .<::Ol - . W 0- .<:: E -em.....1... -> ~ :::J . :t:: Ul Ol C '" Ol C) c: 'S; m OOl .E 0 . J:: ll: Ul .<:: N !; .f: .9~~ C1::1 .<:: N . -l Ol '" ~E 1::1 - . .... 0 ~ >; -l a:: E g> co Q) Ol ~ ~ E . Cll '(3 :::J ~ . .c <( '" I/) C .a'x~:5 .Ee Ol 0 '" 0 . ;: c a. 1::1 Ol C :::J 1::1- C ni >- 1::::LO~ . Ol L... 0)- en . Q) J:: -l C E 0 Q)..,J ro "0 CU.!: Ol ~ ::JzO: . <( 0 'E () .<:: ~ .E . c: Q) '" "C_c:c: Ol '" - c: 0:2 co Ul ~ --, <( C.:: 1::1'" . <fl ..J ...: 'w 0 cu,9=! :2 Ol () _@ . .0: 0 25 ~ ~~ g~ c.~ _!!l Q)!!l c: . ... ...... UI . Cll u >- .l!l.<:: Ol >.::J c: = Q) . 0 Q) E .0: Ol '" o:O~E 1/)1::1 1/)- ~ w~mJ:!!l . J:: 0 E :C' ~ Ol"'E ,_ C ~ C . ;: ~ e C Ol '" Ol'- '" L... -, c: :J . CII .. ~ :::J ~ (I) ~ L... 3: ~'" 1::11::1 E ~~~ Q) ~ . Q) or) "") u.. l/) l/) '" co Q) ro 0 OlOl COl c:-Q)"C- . ~ Ol ~=..cc: . Q) .<::~ :::JOl '" .- COr--.. I... co . a a. Eo."" 1-'" _C CJ)(f)T'""<(cn . en 0'\ James Lehnhoff From: Sent: To: Subject: Bruce, Sheldon J [sheldon,j,bruce@boeing.com] Monday, September 24,200712:37 PM james.lehnhoff@cLarden-hill.mn.us Arden Plaza Development Because of the new stores I assume there will be increased car and pedestrian traffic. IS there any way to get the city or Arden Plaza owners to pay for sidewalks south along Lexington Ave to at least Harriet Ave ? Currently people use the Catholic Aid parking lot and a steep path through the tree barrier south of the Plaza. 1 James Lehnhoff From: Sent: To: Jeff Fog Oeffbarbfog@mac.com] Monday, September 24, 2007 8:20 PM James Lehnhoff; sjharpstead@comcast.net; David_Grant; holdenbj24@aol.com; franh116 @aol.com; davemcclung@comcast.net Walgreens Subject: You're all very busy, so I'll make this short. NO WALGREENS!! Simply stated, we do not need another big $ pharmacy. We have Cub and Target pharmacies to meet the needs of customers who like a chain store. And for those who appreciate a "neighborhood" type of atmosphere, we have Arden Plaza Pharmacy and Gift. The postal contract station at Arden Pharmacy does a tremendous business. The gift department is exceptional and a rare find nowadays. The traffic situation is already a challenge. A Walgreens would really make the problem much worse. I understand that adding new businesses will enhance our area, but developing Arden Hills with something we could really benefit from is crucial. Please keep our city's charm and avoid a nWalgreens on EVERY corner". Thank you all for your time and effort. Sincerely, Barb and Jeff Fog 3421 Snelling Avenue North, Arden Hills 1 632 Harriet Avenue Shoreview, Minn, SS126 September 2S, 2007 James Lehnhoff, Stan Harpstead, David Grant, Brenda Holden, Fran Holmes, Dave McClung Planning Commission: David Sand, Clayton Zimmerman, Clayton Larson, Elizabeth Modesette, Roberta Thompson, Janet Stodola, Andy Howela Arden Hills City Hall 1245 W. Hwy 96 Arden Hillis. Minnesota. 5S112 To All of You: I do not live in Arden Hills, but I visit the Arden Hills Pharmacy at least four times a week if not more and I am deeply troubled. I am having a difficult time understanding the logic for building another pharmacy when we already have three pharmacies within two blocks!! The Arden Hills Pharmacy has been there during most of my residency in the area. They are ALWAYS HELPFUL and available whenever help is needed. I am sure you all realize that Walgreen Pharmacy would put other pharmacies out of business. Is that a good move? Is that progress? I think not. Is Walgreen the only option you have? What other options are there? Please don't put in Walgreen there Just to fill a vacancy. Check further. ~ ~HILLS MEMORANDUM DATE: October 3, 2007 PC Agenda Item 3.D TO: Planning Commission James Lehnhoff, City Planne~ Planning Case # 06-037 Northwestern College Campns Master Planned Unit Development Amendment 3003 Snelling Avenue North FROM: SUBJECT: A TT ACHMENTS: 3D-l Updated Letter and Plans Submitted by the Applicant 3D-2 Public Comments/Letters 3D-3 March 7, 2007, Planuing Case 06-037 Memo (w/o attachments) and meeting minutes 3D-4 February, 7, 2007, Planning Case 06-037 Memo (w/o attachments) and meeting minutes Requested Action Northwestern College is requesting approval of a proposed updated Master Plan for their campus at 3003 Snelling Avenue North. Update The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed Northwestern College Master Plan during public hearings on February 7 and March 7, 2007. At the March 7 meeting, the Planning Commission voted to recommend approval (6-0) subject to fourteen conditions to the City Council. The review with the Arden Hills City Council was delayed due to additional review time needed with the City of Roseville. As part of the Roseville review process, the College completed an environmental assessment worksheet (EA W). Although the EA W was completed for the City of City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor October 3, 2007 \\Metro-inet.us\ardenhills\Planning\Planning Cases\2006\06-037 Northwestern College Master Plan (PENDING)\lO0307 - PC Report- Northwestern College Master Plan.doc Page 1 of 12 Roseville, the EA W covered both the Roseville and the Arden Hills side of the campus. As the responsible govemment unit (RGU) for the EA W, the Roseville City Council determined that an environmental impact statement (EIS) was not necessary, which is a more in-depth environmental review. However, the EA W did prompt changes to the proposed Master Plan. An EA W does not decide whether or not a project should be completed. The goal of the EA W process is to identify potential impacts of a proposal and propose changes to the Plan that may mitigate the potential impacts. Arden Hills will use the information prepared in the EA W during each site plan review as the Plan is implemented. Since it has been seven months since the application was last reviewed by the Arden Hills Planning Commission and since the Master Plan has been revised since that viewing, it was determined that the application should return to the Planning Commission for a second review before going to the City Council. The Arden Hills City Attorney has determined that the review timeline restarts when a proposal undergoes significant changes before it is approved by the City Council. Northwestern College has also acknowledged the importance of completing the full review process. The Roseville City Council reviewed the revised Northwestern College PUD Master Plan at their September 24,2007, meeting. They voted to continue the discussion to their October 8, 2007, meeting. Backl!round 1. Overview of Request The full information from the February 7 and March 7 reports will not be repeated in this memo. Ifneeded, the full packets from those meetings can be viewed online at htto://www.ci.arden-hills.nm.us/planningcases. The reports, without the attachments, and the minutes from those meetings are attached for your review (Attachment 3D-3 and 4). The applicant has submitted a letter to the City outlining the changes that were made to the proposed Master Plan since the last meeting with the Arden Hills Planning Commission (Attachment 3D-I). The revisions were primarily in response to the original fourteen recommended conditions of approval, the EA W, and other public comments. The applicants will be in attendance at the Planning Commission meeting to answer specific questions about the Master Plan. Although this application is technically an amendment to the Master Plan approved in 1991 by Arden Hills, it essentially replaces that Plan. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor October 3,2007 \\Metro-inet.us\ardenhills\Planning\Planning Cases\2006\06-037 Northwestern College Master Plan (PENDING)\l00307 - PC Report- Northwestern College Master Plan.doc Page 2 of 12 2. The Campus Master Planned Unit Development Process The proposed Northwestern College Master Plan is a form of a Campus Master Planned Unit Development (PUD). Smaller PUDs typically have at least two public meetings--one for the Master Plan and one for the Final Plan (Section 1320.14 ofthe Zoning Code). Generally, the Master Plan lays out the design and concept for a development, and the Final Plan incorporates any changes required by the City to mitigate the impacts of the development. The Final Plans are usually detailed and include a specific construction timetable. In the case of Northwestern College, and other large PUDs in the City (i.e. Boston Scientific), there will not be one Final Plan stage. Instead, the Master Plan outlines the overall development plan for the Campus, an estimated construction timeline, the impacts of the Plan, mitigation measures, and expectations from the City. A Campus Master Plan is less detailed in terms of architecture, landscaping, and stormwater management because the Plan covers a longer timeframe and changes may need to be made before a particular part of the Plan is implemented. However, as each phase ofthe Master Plan is implemented, the College will be required to return to the City for a site plan review and comply with any new regulations and Statutes that are adopted after the Master Plan approval. During the site plan review for a particular building or change to the campus, the College will submit a detailed construction, landscaping, stormwater management, and other plans required by the City. The site plan review process requires review from the Planning Commission and approval from the City Council before any permits are issued. Having a Master Plan in place allows the College to plan for the future with some certainty and it makes it easier for the City and neighborhood to know what changes may be made at the College over the next twelve to twenty years. The College can also prepare mitigation measures in advance based on City and neighborhood concerns. 3. Site Data North Lake Johanna South (RosevilJe) Institutional Planned Unit Develo ment Zone R-I: Single Family Residential Institutional East Low Density Residential Single Family Residential West Low Density Residential R-I: Single Family Residential Single Family Residential City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for October 3, 2007 \\Metro-inet.us\ardenhills\Planning\Planning Cases\2006\06-037 Northwestern College Master Plan (PENDING)\l00307 - PC Report ~ Northwestern College Master Plan.doc Pagel of 12 P\I: Public & Institutional Institutional: Higher Education R-l: Single Family Residential 42,69 Acres in Arden Hills, 45,31 Acres in Roseville, and 88 Acres total To be determined based on how many students equals one FTE Variable, Steep slope toward Lake Johanna and Little Lake Johanna, Generally flat in the central ortions of the ca us, Additional Plan Review and Findinl!:s 1. Impervious Coverage/Landscaped Area Impervious and Structure Coverage by City and T atal Existing Proposed Maximum This chart is subject to change. square feet square feet square feet Structure Coverage 132,316 8% 179,550 11% 399,554 25% Impervious Coverage 515,155 32% 575.461 36% 650,852 35% Arden Hills Landscaped Area 1,083,061 68% 1,022,755 64% No Maximum Water Area* 261,360 14% 261,360 261,360 Land Area 1,598,216 86% 1,598,216 1.598,216 Total Property Size 1,859,576 1,859.576 1.859,576 Structure Coverage 99,555 7% 135,733 9% -- .- Impervious Coverage 436,235 29% 495,060 32% -- -- Roseville Landscaped Area 1,088,801 71% 1,029,976 68% No Maximum Water Area* 448,668 23% 448,668 448,668 Land Area 1,525,036 77% 1.525,036 1,525,036 Total Property Size 1,973,704 1,973,704 1,973,704 Structure Coverage 231,871 7% 315,283 10% -- n Impervious Coverage 951,390 30% 1,070,521 34% -- -- Total Landscaped Area 2,171,862 70% 2,052,731 66% No Maximum Water Area** 710,028 19% 710,028 710,028 Land Area 3,123.252 81% 3,123,252 3,123,252 Total Properly Size"''' 3,833,280 3,833,280 3,833,280 "Estimated by City Staff -Reported by TKDA, 15,9 Acres -*Only includes the property north of Lydia Ave in the PUD, -88 acres The PUD area includes the 88 acres north of Lydia Avenue. The other properties south of Lydia Avenue in Roseville are subject to separate regulations set by the City of Roseville and are not part of this overall PUD review process. The land area in Arden Hills is approximately 37 acres and the water area is approximately six acres. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor October 3, 2007 \\Metro-inet.us\ardenhills\Planning\Planning Cases\2006\06-037 Northwestern College Master Plan (pENDING)\100307 - PC Report- Northwestern College Master Plan.doc Page 4 of 12 The above structure and impervious coverage chart has been revised to include the total land area, the total water area, and the proposed lot coverage of the land area for each City. Please note that the impervious coverage includes the structure coverage. TKDA did indicate that the proposed building and overall impervious coverage is estimated since the actual footprint of a structure may change when the College moves forward with a particular construction project. As noted above, all construction projects in Arden Hills are subject to the site plan review process, which requires Planning Commission and City Council review. The additional buildings would not cause the campus to exceed the twenty-five (25) percent structure coverage limit in Arden Hills; however, the campus may slightly exceed the thirty- five (35) percent overall impervious coverage limit by about one percentage point on the Arden Hills side of the campus. However, when viewing the entire campus, the total impervious coverage would be only thirty-four (34) percent. Since the Roseville portion of the Campus is within a different zoning classification, the impervious and structure coverage limit may vary in Roseville depending on the type of development. The City can permit the campus to exceed the thirty-five (35) percent impervious coverage limit as part of the PUD approval process. However, a condition limiting the campus to thirty-five (35) percent coverage could be included and, if necessary, the College could approach the City in the future with a PUD amendment to increase the coverage limit if deemed necessary. It is also possible that the thirty-five (35) percent limit will not be exceeded since the exact impervious/building coverage will not be fully determined until a particularly structure is designed. 2. Lot and Lake Setbacks While the Master Plan meets the minimum side setbacks required in the R-I Zone, the PUD process can allow the City to require a greater setback to reduce any potential impacts on adjacent properties. It may be prudent to discuss setting greater minimum building setbacks to decrease the impact of the College on adjacent properties, particularly along the eastern property line. The City ofRoseville is moving forward with a 75 foot setback along the eastern property line and a 30 foot setback along the western property line. Staff has included a similar requirement in the conditions of approval to maintain consistency and to reduce the potential impact on adjacent properties. The PUD report indicates that Little Lake Johanna is classified as a General Development (GD) lake in Arden Hills and a Recreational Development (RD) lake in Roseville. The lake designation is set by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, and Little Lake Johanna is an RD lake. An RD lake requires a minimum 75 foot setback from the ordinary high water mark despite what is stated in the Arden Hills Zoning Code. The Zoning Code needs to be updated to reflect this requirement set by the DNR. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor October 3, 2007 \\Metro-inet.us\ardenhills\Planning\Planning Cases\2006\06~037 Northwestern College Master Plan (PENDING)\100307 - PC Report- Northwestern College Master Plan.doc Page 5 of 12 3. Landscaping A specific landscaping plan for each building or construction project would be developed during the site plan review process, and they would be expected to meet the landscaping standards the City requires at the time of the permit review. The College has submitted a preliminary landscaping plan for the eastern side of the campus near the proposed road relocation as requested by the Planning Commission during their March 2007 review (Attachment 3D-I). A detailed landscaping/screening plan review will be part of the site plan review process for each phase of the development, including the ring road, the dormitory, and the parking garage. 4. Full-time Equivalent Students As noted earlier, the College is proposing to expand from 1650 full-time equivalent students to 2,400 full-time equivalent (FTE) students. The College has submitted the following formula for calculating how many people create one FTE: Hiqher Education Directorv/Common Data Set Method: FTE = Full-time Headcount + (Part-time Headcount/3) Over 95 percent of the students typically are full-time (12 or more credits). So, for example, a full- time headcount of 1601 students, plus a part-time headcount of 66 students results in a FTE number of 1623. Previous Recommended Conditions of Approval The following fourteen conditions were included in the initial recommendation for approval to the City Council. Most of these conditions are included in the revised conditions for approval. 1. Enrollment shall not exceed 2400 full-time equivalent students, and a definition of FTE shall be provided in the Master Plan document. 2, The Northwestern College Master Plan shall be subject to a review by the Planning Commission and City Council every five years in order to review general activity on the campus and to evaluate compliance with the Master Plan, These reviews shall include, but not be limited to, reviewing enrollment, parking conditions, landscaping/screening, site plans, construction projects, other needed mitigation measures, and overall progress on and compliance with the Master Plan. The first review shall occur no later than five years after the date of approval by the City Council. Amendments to the Campus Master Plan shall require public hearings whether or not they occur the same time as the five year review, 3. The applicant shall amend the Master Plan to comply with the applicable comments in the February 5, 2007, letter from the Fire Marshal; the February 16, 2007, memo from the Building Official; and the March 1,2007, memo from the Civil Engineer. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor October 3, 2007 \\Metro-inet.us\ardenhills\Planning\Planning Cases\2006\06..Q37 Northwestern College Master Plan (PENDING)\l00307 - PC Report M Northwestern College Master Plan.doc Page 6 of 12 4, The central parking structure (Building 23 on the Northwestern College Master Plan Scope) shall be designed so that vehicles are not required to traverse the reiocated ring road when exiting the parking structure. 5, Relocating any campus road shall require a site plan review and public hearing before the Planning Commission and approval from the City Council prior to construction. 6, Lighting from any new or remodeled structures, parking lots, or roads shall be prohibited from shining directly onto adjacent properties and shall not exceed the lighting limitations in the Zoning Code. 7. A road connection to the campus shall be strictly prohibited in the City of Arden Hills, which shall include a prohibition on connecting a road to Asbury Avenue and Shorewood Drive. 8. Construction of new buildings entirely on the Roseville portion of the campus shall not require a permit from Arden Hills but construction plans shall be submitted to Arden Hills prior to construction to include in the Northwestern College address file, 9. All construction activities shall require a permit from the Rice Creek Watershed District and any other applicable regulatory agency prior to any building permits being issued by the City. 10, Except for walkways, no impervious surfaces shall be constructed within the fifty foot lake setback. 11. Any building exceeding the height limit of the underlying R-1 Zone shall require an approved height variance prior to construction. 12, Northwestern College shall meet all regulatory requirements and standards in place at the time of development unless the College receives an approved variance or other deviation in accordance with State Statutes, City Codes, Rice Creek Watershed District, and other regulatory agencies. 13, The Master Plan shall be subject to all conditions and regulations set by the City of Roseville. 14. The applicant shall submit a detailed landscaping plan for the area along the eastern border of the campus prior to the City Council review. Evaluation Criteria The evaluation criteria for a planned unit development includes, but is not limited to, the following: 1. Existing and anticipated traffic and parking conditions; 2. Noise, glare, odors, vibration, smoke, dust, air pollution, heat, liquid or solid waste, and other nuisance characteristics; 3. Drainage; 4. Population density; 5. Visual and land use compatibility with uses and structures on surrounding land; adjoining land values; 6. Park dedications where applicable; and the 7. Orderly development of the neighborhood and the City within the general purpose and intent of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Development Plan for the City. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor October 3, 2007 \\Metro.inet.us\ardenhills\Planning\Planning Cases\2006\06-037 Northwestern College Master Plan (PENDING)\100307 - PC Report- Northwestern College Master Plan.doc Page 7 of 12 Findin!1:s of Fact Staff offers the following findings for your consideration: 1. The applicant proposes to expand the full-time equivalent student population from 1650 to 2400 over the next 20 years or longer. 2. The applicant proposes to increase the number of buildings from twelve to nineteen on the campus as a whole. 3. Northwestern College is located within the R-l Zoning District. 4. Higher education is a permitted use in the R-I Zoning District as a Planned Unit Development. 5. The total impervious coverage on the Arden Hills portion ofthe campus is proposed to increase from 32 percent of the land area to 36 percent of the land area. On the campus as a whole, impervious coverage would increase from 30 percent to 34 percent. The R-I limit is 35 percent. 6. The total structure coverage on the Arden Hills portion of the campus is proposed to increase from eight percent of the land area to eleven percent ofthe land area. On the campus a whole, the total structure coverage would increase from seven percent to ten percent. The R-llimit is 25 percent. 7. The site plan review process will be used to evaluate each phase of the Master Plan prior to construction. 8. The traffic and parking needs generated by Northwestern College will increase. The traffic impact will be primarily felt by the roads and intersections in the City of Rose vi lie and are being dealt with in the Roseville PUD review. 9. There are not any entrances permitted or requested into the City of Arden Hills. 10. Temporary dust and vibration may occur during construction activities. 11. Noise may increase from the increased traffic in and around the campus. 12. The College has submitted a stormwater management study that will be implemented as the Master Plan is implemented. 13. The population density on the property will increase with additional students and staff. 14. The visual compatibility of the proposed structures will be evaluated during the individual site plan review process for each construction phase. 15. The proposal does not include a subdivision and the park dedication fee does not apply. 16. The proposed Master Plan does not conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan. 17. The City of Roseville determined that the environmental assessment worksheet (EA W) did not warrant an environmental impact statement (ElS). Notice & Resident Comment Since the application has been revised, a new notice was published in the Arden Hills/Shoreview Bulletin. Although State Statutes only require a 350 feet radius for notification, this notice was also mailed to property owners within one thousand (1000) feet of Northwestern College. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeiingfor October 3, 2007 \\Metro-inet.us\ardenhills\Planning\Planning Cases\2006\06..Q37 Northwestern College Master Plan (pENDING)\100307 - PC Report- Northwestern College Master Plan.doc Page 80f 12 Staff Analvsis Written public comments that have been collected since this application was first viewed by the City are included with this report (Attachment 3D-3). With the changes made to the Master Plan proposal, the revised plan would appear to have less of an impact than the previous plan that was recommended for approval by the Planning Commission on March 7, 2007. Staff does not have any objections or other proposed changes to the Master Plan except for the recommended twenty-three conditions of approval. In addition to the submitted PUD document and plans, the twenty-three conditions provide the framework for limiting and guiding change on the Campus along with mitigating potential impacts. If the Planning Commission determines that the Master Plan is in compliance with the Arden Hills Zoning Code and will not result in a significant negative impact on the City, then the Planning Commission can recommend approval to the City Council. If there is a recommendation of approval for Planning Case 06-037, Staff recommends the following twenty- three conditions be included with the approval: 1. Enrollment Limit. Enrollment shall not exceed 2400 full-time equivalent students. The definition for full-time equivalent student shall be included in the PUD permit for future evaluation purposes. 2. Master Plan Implementation Updates. The Northwestern College Master Plan shall be subject to a review by the Planning Commission and City Council every five years in order to review general activity on the campus and to evaluate compliance with the Master Plan, the conditions associated with the Master Plan, and the conditions of any other projects constructed after the Master Plan was approved. These reviews shall include, but not be limited to, reviewing enrollment numbers for full-time equivalent students, parking conditions, landscaping/screening, site plans, construction projects, other needed mitigation measures, and overall progress on and compliance with the Master Plan. The first review shall occur no later than five years after the date of approval by the City Council. 3. Site Plan Review. Construction projects and changes to the campus that are substantially in conformance with the approved Master Plan shall only require a site plan review with the Planning Commission and City Council prior to implementation. 4. PUD Amendments. Amendments to the Campus Master Plan shall conform to the provisions within the Arden Hills Zoning Code and shall require a public hearing. 5. Code Compliance. Northwestern College shall meet all regulatory requirements and standards in place at the time of construction unless the College receives an approved variance that is in accordance with State Statutes, City Codes, Rice Creek Watershed District, and other regulatory agencies. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor October 3, 2007 \\Metro-inet.us\ardenhills\Planning\Planning Cases\2006\06-037 Northwestern College Master Plan (pENDING)\100307 - PC Report- Northwestern College Master Plan.doc Page 9 of12 6. Code Compliance and Permittin!!. All construction activities shall require a permit from the Rice Creek Watershed District and any other applicable regulatory agency prior to any building permits being issued by the City. 7. Parkin!! Structure Desi!!n. The parking structure (Building 23 on the Northwestern College Master Plan Scope) shall be designed so that vehicles are not required to traverse the relocated ring road when entering or exiting the parking structure. The design of the structure shall be responsive to other buildings on the campus and compatible with the residential character of the surrounding neighborhood. 8. Rin!! Road Review Process. Constructing or relocating any campus roads or surface parking lots shall require a site plan review and public hearing before the Planning Commission and approval from the City Council prior to construction. A landscaping plan to significantly screen the road from the adjacent residential properties shall be required. 9. Prohibited Road Connection. A road connection to Asbury Avenue and Shorewood Drive from the campus shall be strictly prohibited. 10. Permittin!! and Inspections. The City of Arden Hills and the City of Roseville shall jointly determine which municipality is responsible for issuing permits and inspecting construction sites for any project that crosses the municipal border. 11. Permittin!!. Construction of new buildings entirely on the Roseville portion of the campus shall not require a permit from Arden Hills but construction plans shall be submitted to Arden Hills at least two weeks prior to construction to include in the Northwestern College address file. 12. Lake Setbacks. Except for walkways, no impervious surfaces shall be constructed within the 50 feet of the ordinary high water mark for Lake Johanna and 75 feet from the ordinary high water mark for Little Lake Johanna. The use of pervious surfaces for walkways shall be encouraged. 13. Property Setbacks. All structures, including parking ramps, and roads shall be at least seventy-five (75) feet from the eastern property line and thirty (30) feet from the western property line. 14. Buildin!! Hei!!ht. Any building exceeding the height limit of the underlying R-l Zone shall require an approved height variance prior to construction. 15. Li!!htin!!. Lighting from any new or remodeled structures, parking lots, roads, or other campus features shall be prohibited from shining directly onto adjacent properties and shall not exceed the lighting limitations in the Arden Hills Zoning Code. 16. Lot Covera!!e. The portion of the campus within Arden Hills shall not exceed 35 percent lot coverage without an approved variance or PUD amendment as required by the Zoning Code at the time of review. The lakes shall not be included in the lot coverage calculations. 17. Tree Preservation. A tree preservation plan shall be submitted with each site plan review and shall be in compliance with any current and future tree preservation standards. 18. Buckthorn Removal. The College shall continue to implement a buckthorn removal program to protect the native landscaping in and around the College's property. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor October 3, 2007 \\Metro-inet.us\ardenhills\Planning\Planning Cases\2006\06-037 Northwestern College Master Plan (PENDING)\l00307 - PC Report- Northwestern College Master Plan.doc Page10 of]2 19. Trash/Recvcline:/Refnse Handline:. All trash, recycling, and other refuse handling shall be in conformance with Section 620.04 of the City Code and as amended in the future. 20. Storm water Manae:ement. The College shall be required to conform and implement the following as a part of their storm water management plan for this development: a. Each development phase must meet the regulatory standards in place at the time of building permit application. All stages of development should recognize the others to ensure that a comprehensive storm water management plan is constructed for the site. b. Site impervious coverage shall be consistent with the provisions of City Zoning and Shoreland Ordinances. c. The College will identify and eliminate all direct, untreated piped discharges into Lake Johanna and Little Lake Johanna as a part of the campus expansion plans. 21. Enerl!V Efficient Desie:n. Each phase shall use as many Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) principles as the College deems possible. 22. City of Roseville Conditions. The Master Plan shall be subject to all conditions and regulations set by the City of Roseville. Conditions imposed by the City of Arden Hills shall not be deemed to invalidate any conditions set by the City ofRoseville. 23. Environmental Review. The City of Arden Hills reserves the right to request an updated environmental assessment with future construction and site plan review processes. The above conditions are taken from the original fourteen conditions of approval, the EA W, and conditions included in the City of Roseville. Since the campus crosses city boundaries, Staff felt it was important to acknowledge the applicable conditions from the City ofRoseville review. If the Master Plan is approved with the above conditions (and any other conditions added during the review process), a PUD permit with the applicable conditions will be prepared for City Council review. If the City Council adopts these conditions, a PUD amendment and full public hearing would be required for future changes to these conditions. Options & Proposed Motion Lane:uae:e 1. Recommend Approval with Conditions: Motion to recommend avvroval of Planning Case 06-037 for a Campus Master Planned Unit Development for Northwestern College at 3003 Snelling Avenue North based on the [mdings of fact, submitted plans, and twenty-three conditions in the October 3, 2007, planning case report. 2. Recommend Approval as Submitted: Motion to recommend avvroval ofPlanuing Case 06- 037 for a Campus Master Planned Unit Development for Northwestern College at 3003 Snelling Avenue North based on the submitted plans in the October 3,2007, planning case report. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for October 3, 2007 \\Metro-inet.us\ardenhills\Planning\Planning Cases\2006\06-Q37 Northwestern College Master Plan (PENDING)\100307 - PC Report. Northwestern College Master Plan.doc Page 11 of 12 3. Recommend Denial: Motion to recommend denial of Planning Case 06-037 for a Campus Master Planned Unit Development for Northwestern College at 3003 Snelling Avenue North based on the following findings: findings to deny should specifically reference the reasons for denial and why those reasons cannot be mitigated. 4. Table: Motion to table Planning Case 06-037 for a Campus Master Planned Unit Development for Northwestern College at 3003 Snelling Avenue North: a specific reason and information request should be included with a motion to table. Deadline for Aeencv Actions The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on January 22,2007. The Planning Commission provided a recommendation of approval at their March 7, 2007, meeting, which was within the time period prescribed by Minnesota State Statute 15.99. While the application had been set to go before the City Council within the require time period, Northwestern College granted the City of Arden Hills a number of extension requests so that they could continue the process with the City ofRoseville. The most recent extension request expired on September 24,2007. However, since Northwestern College has revised the layout of the proposed Master Plan, the City Attorney has determined that the review process and timeline can restart. Northwestern College submitted the revised application on September 17, 2007. The revised application was deemed complete on September 24, 2007. The City must act on this request by November 11, 2007 (60 days). If the City provides the applicant with written reasons for an extension, the review period can be extended an additional sixty days to January 21,2008. The City may, with the petitioners' consent, extend the review period past January 21,2008. Attachments 3D-1 Updated Letter and Plans Submitted by the Applicant 3D-2 Public Comments/Letters 3D-3 March 7, 2007, Planning Case 06-037 Memo (w/o attachments) and meeting minutes 3D-4 February, 7, 2007, Planning Case 06-037 Memo (w/o attachments) and meeting minutes City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor October 3, 2007 \\Metro-inet.us\ardenhills\Planning\Planning Cases\2006\06-037 Northwestern College Master Plan (PENDING)\100307 - PC Report- Northwestern College Master Plan.doc Page 12 of 12 Attachment 3D-l Updated Letter and Plans Submitted by the Applicant A CD in the PUD Document Includes the: A. Traffic and Parking Study B. Stormwater Management Study C. Long Range Campus Master Plan ~ ~HiLLS October 3, 2007, Planning Commission Meeting TKDA ENGINEERS' ARCHITECTS. PLANNERS Northwestern College Master Plan Northwestern College Roseville and Arden Hills, Minnesota PUD Application Report Submitted: Revised: Revised: Revised: Revised: Project No. November 15,2006 January 18, 2007 May 7,2007 August 24, 2007 September 10, 2007 13529.000 444 CedarSfreel. Suite 1500 Saint Paul, MN 55101.2140 (651} 292-4400 (651} 292-0083 fax www.lkda.com NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE MASTER PLAN PUD APPLICATION REPORT TKDA PROJECT NO. 13529.000 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO. SECTION I SECTION II SECTION III SECTION IV. SECTION V SECTION VI SECTION VII SECTION VIII SECTION IX, INTRODUCTION, ... ............, ................, .........,..,.......... AMENDED PUD PLAN ........... .............,.. ............ ............ TRAFFIC AND PARKING IMPACT STUDy........ ........ STORMWATER MANAGEMENT STUDy,........................., GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN..........................., ........... LANDSCAPING PLAN...... ........,..,.... .............,............. ........" BUILDING ELEVATIONS ....,................,.............,.....,..,...., LIGHTING........... ................................. ............, .........., BUILDING AND ROAD SETBACKS ,............,... ............, .....,............ ........,....1 ......2 ......9 ............, ..10 .11 ....12 .14 .....14 ..15 APPENDIX PAGES Master Plan (2003) Partners and Sirny Architects (See separately attached report)........ Campus Master Plan Scope Map (Summer 2004) ......................... ............, ............. .....1 Campus Master Plan Scope Map (Revised FaI/2006)............,...... ........... ............, ..1 Campus Master Plan Scope Map (Revised FaI/2007)..........., .................... ............1 Campus Master Plan Figure 4 (2006) TKDA..,.......................................,......, .......,..... ...1 Anticipated General Site Development and Phasing Plan (August 2007)..,.,........... ..........,...... .1 Stormwater Management Plan (See separately attached report) ............................., ...,.........,.99 Traffic and Parking Impact Study (See separately attached report) ....................... ............,.....64 Conceptual Building Plans for Life and Health Fitness Center - Previous PUD ...... ...7 Conceptual Building Plans for new Residence Hall- Previous PUD..,...............,........ ..........,.6 Northwestern College Master Plan PUD Application Report ii 13529.000 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE MASTER PLAN PUD APPLICATION REPORT I. INTRODUCTION Founded in 1902 as the Northwestern Bible and Missionary School, Northwestern College is a private, non-denominational Christian College. Northwestern's academic program offers 45 bachelor degrees ranging from elementary education and pastoral studies to broadcasting/electronic media and psychology. In 1949, the College broadened its focus when Twin Cities' radio station KTIS went on the air, Below is an image of the campus as it appears today. SNELLING TERRACE SOUTHEAST Northwestern College enjoys an excellent location in the communities of Roseville and Arden Hills. Currently, approximately 1,650 students (Full-Time Equivalent - FTE) are enrolled in traditional undergraduate education programs, Alternative education programs are also offered to students and a Masters program is in development. The education, values, and atmosphere provided by Northwestern College has proven increasingly popular, resulting in increased demand for a limited number of openings each year, In response to this demand, the College hired a consultant who prepared a Master Plan for the College. This study determined that both in terms of programs (staffing and curriculum) and facilities (size and character of the campus), the ideal size of the campus in terms of full-time enrollment (FTE's) is 2,400 students, To provide necessary Northwestern College Master Plan PUD Application Report 13529.000 classrooms, support facilities, and parking, the College prepared its Master Plan which lays out the facility needs and plan for the College for the next 12 to 20 years. With these opportunities, we respectfully submit the accompanying application as well as the plans and text of this Report for the purpose of amending Northwestern College's Planned Unit Development (PUD). II. AMENDED PUD PLAN The following sections address the specific requirements of the written PUD submittal for the City of Arden Hills' PUD Concept Plan Application and the City of Roseville's PUD General Concept Plan Application. A. NATURE OF THE APPLICANT'S INTEREST Due to a number of programs and needed physical plant improvements, Northwestern College has identified a future enrollment target of 2,400 full-time equivalent (FTE) students in traditional undergraduate programs. Currently, enrollment is restricted due to the shortage of facilities available on campus. In order to have capacity for the growth desired and to accommodate existing needs, the College is proposing improvements over the next 12 to 20 years, as identified in the College's Master Plan, completed in 2003. This Master Plan, deveioped by Partners and Sirny Architects, integrates academic planning and facilities planning and is referenced in the Appendix of this Report. The Master Plan Map was updated in the Fall of 2006 and in August 2007 and is in the Appendix of this Report B, SIZE OF THE DEVELOPMENT Northwestern College currently has 1,650 full-time equivalent students, The College is projecting FTE enrollment of 2,400 by 2018. Today, Northwestern College's campus consists of approximately 107 acres and 15 buildings. The Master Plan proposes six new structures, consisting of a Community Life Center (student union), a science building, a residence hall, an athletic field house, a visitor/alumni center, and one parking structure, Additions include the Totino Fine Arts Center, Berntsen Resource Center, and the KTIS Addition, The existing road that bisects the campus will be re-routed east of Riley Hall, reducing safety issues for students and enabling the College to create a Campus Green. Northwestern College Master Plan PUD Application Report 2 13529.000 In addition to allowing the College to better serve its existing and expected enrollment, the improvements will enable the College to better serve its larger "community", including neighbors, host cities, organizations, and related higher education institutions in the Twin Cities. C, DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT The Planned Unit Development (PUD) is the process the College must address in order to implement its Facilities Plan, The Facilities Plan is the physical component of Northwestern College's Institutional Plan. The Institutional Plan, in turn, represents the framework into which all the separate college systems function together in an integrated whole. At Northwestern College, the direction of the College is set by its academic endeavors. Other functions, including physical development, exist to support those academic functions, The educational goals are supplemented by financial and facilities goals, which work together to meet the overall mission of the College, The purpose of the Facilities Plan (and the PUD) is to "correlate the human, educational, financial, physical and intangible elements of the educational environment into an optimal relationship within the institution," As im-portant as its academic mission, the College has many relationships with organizations and institutions outside the College, As part of the Cities of Arden Hills and Roseville as well as to other academic and non-academic organizations, the College sees its role to maintain and improve those linkages through urban outreach, community involvement and services and facilities. D. CHANGES IN PLAN DETAILS Since application was made for this PUD, several changes in the proposal have been made, These changes have resulted from refinements of the concepts in the original plan (exact relocation of the Campus road) and from listening to comments from residents, agencies and City Staff (berming and screening between new road and residents, moving of proposed dormitory away from east boundary of the Campus and deletion of maintenance facility and small parking structure). In some cases, there are several versions of graphic maps or plans in this Report. The original plans Northwestern College Master Plan PUD Application Report 3 13529,000 were retained for continuity; the plans with most recent dates reflect the current proposed PUD. The overall development concept of the plan is framed by the educational mission of the College as well as by its external relationships. The Facilities Plan as expressed in the PUD application is intended to strengthen the educational mission by providing improved, expanded, and safer facilities for its students. At the same time, by improving its facilities, internal circulation, parking, and surface water management. it Northwestern College Master Plan 4 13529.000 PUD Application Report can enhance its commitment to the greater community, including neighborhoods and residents near the university. E, DENSITY OF INTENSITY OF LAND USE The College currently has 1,650 full time equivalent students with 514 associated staff and faculty. With the proposed increase to 2,400 FTE's and the related increase in staff and faculty (168), total campus usage will be 3,082, There are fifteen (15) existing buildings on approximately 107 acres, With the proposed increase in buildings, total campus usage will be twenty (20) buildings. Building gross square footage will increase from the current approximate 656,306 square feet to approximately 1,089,812 square feet, or by 433,506 square feet To break this down by city, the estimated distribution is as follows: Existing GSF in Arden Hills Existing GSF in Roseville Total Existing GSF 275,103 381,203 656,306 Proposed Additional GSF in AH Proposed Additional GSF in Roseville Total Proposed Additional GSF 185,740 247,766 433,506 Total GSF at Buildout in AH Total GSF at Buildout in Roseville Total GSF at Buildout 460,843 628,969 1,089,812 * All numbers are approximate, estimated on general information only, and may change once building designs are complete. Impervious surface on the campus currently represents approximately 951,390 square feet With proposed improvements, impervious surface will increase to 1,070,521 square feet Existing impervious surface in Roseville is approximately 436,235 square feet, increasing to 495,060 square feet Approximate existing impervious surface in Arden Hills is 515,155 square feet, increasing to 575,461 square feet This is an overall 12.5 % increase in impervious surface. The proposed improvements are expected to be phased in over the next 12 to 20 years, As these capital improvements are made, related improvements for surface water management, traffic, and parking will be made to accommodate student/faculty enrollment growth. Northwestern College Master Plan PUD Application Report 5 13529,000 F. DEVELOPMENT TIMELlNE AND GENERALIZED STAGING SCHEDULE Based on the Master Plan that was developed in 2003, over the course of 12 to 20 years, there are many proposed improvements, renovations, additions, and other modifications. These proposed projects will address on-campus housing, parking traffic, surface water, and classroom/office space issues faced by the College now and with growth in the number of students, faculty, and staff. In discussions with the College, the 2003 Master Plan has been used as a baseline and updated with new information to develop a potential phasing of the improvements. The projects listed below are preliminary and many are conceptual at this point Over the course of 12 to 20 years, many changes could occur and this Phasing Plan is provided with information known at this time, Reference the 2003 Master Plan map along with the newly developed Master Plan Scope located in the Appendix, Northwestern College Master Plan PUD Application Report 6 13529,000 Below is an estimated time line for student population growth per year. 2006 1,650 2018 2,400 2006 Master Proposed Projects Details Possible Plan Timeline Ref# Road Reconfiguration 1 - 3 yrs 6/23 Remove Tennis Courts and Build Parking on 2 levels, 490 stalls 1 - 3 yrs Parking Ramp 24 Additional Residence Hall Phased as 2 projects (500 beds/84 1 - 10 yrs suites, 3 levels) 20 New Community Life Center 58,000 SF, 2 levels 1 - 3 yrs Building Creation of The Mall Campus green space 3 - 5 yrs +9' New Parking and Maintenance 2 levole, 125 stalls, parking en uppor, 35 yrs Facilities maintenance on lower 2 Nazareth Hall Renovations 3-5 yrs _.~-. +€ Renovate Powerhouse 4+,WO SF, Demolish shBEIs 35 yrs 25 New Fieldhouse / Reconfiguratlon 48,000, 4 Courts, Indoor Track, 1 - 10 yrs of the Athletic Fields Locker Rooms, Offices, Concessions 27 New Dormitory (95 beds) 2940 Infill. 3 levels, Parking on lowest 1 - 10 yrs 8 Erickson Center Renovations 5-8 yrs - 3 Totino Fine Arts Renovations 5-8 yrs 4 Berntsen Library Renovations 5-8 yrs a Riley Hall Renovations Deck Gym ,^,ddition, ,^.dd 11,900 ,^.SF 5 8 yrs 22 New Academic General/Science 48,000 GSF, 3 levels 8-12 yrs Building 18 Music Addition (Art) 20,000 GSF, 3 levels 8-12 yrs 21 Library Addition 12,000 GSF, 3 levels 8-12 yrs 10/17 Demolish Existing Dorm (73 beds) Provides Alternative Ed / 8-12 yrs and Build New Addition to KTIS Administration / Offices / Classrooms 26 Visitor / Alumni Center 5-12 yrs . Since the PUD process began, the College has dropped the Maintenance Building/Parking Facility and Powerhouse Renovations. Riley Hall renovations have been completed. Northwestern College Master Plan PUD Application Report 7 13529.000 G, MODIFICATIONS IN ZONING DISTRICTS. ZONING REGULATIONS. AND/OR SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS According to our information, the southern portion of Northwestern College's campus, located in Roseville, is zoned PUD - Planned Unit Development Chapter 1008.01 of the City of Roseville's Zoning Code states: A planned unit. development "PUD" is a zoning district which may include single or mixed uses, one or more lots or parcels, intended to create a more flexible, creative and efficient approach to the use of land and subject to the procedures, standards, and regulations contained in this Chapter, The northern portion of the campus, located in Arden Hills, is zoned Residential (R-1). The R-1 District allows institutions of higher learning (School, Higher Education) as a Planned Unit according to the Land Use Chart in Section 5, E. of the City of Arden Hills' Zoning Ordinance. In either City, the changes envisioned in the Facilities Plan will not require modifications in the Zoning Regulations or Zoning Districts. Likewise, no changes in Subdivision Regulations are needed. The vehicle for addressing the modifications of the campus is the Planned Unit Development (PUD) which is a process allowed in both cities' zoning regulations. PUD's allow developments of all kinds, (residential, commercial, institutional) to move forward within the framework of the regulations, recognizing the unique nature of the project or institution. H MODIFICATIONS TO COMPREHENSIVE PLANS AND/OR ZONING ORDINANCES No modifications are needed to either cities' Comprehensive Plans or Zoning Ordinances. Northwestern College is consistent with the Comprehensive Plans and Future Land Use associated with each City. Northwestern College Master Plan PUD Application Report 8 13529.000 III. TRAFFIC AND PARKING IMPACT STUDY A Traffic and Parking Impact Study was completed with the purpose of identifying the potential traffic and parking impacts of the proposed Northwestern College Campus Master Plan expansion. The following conclusions summarize the results of this Study. A. Year 2026 Background Conditions dictate the need for the following roadway improvements to reduce excessive queuing and vehicle delay: . A new traffic signal at the intersection of Fairview Avenue/Lydia Avenue with exclusive northbound right turn and southbound left turn lanes to improve level of service, . One additional exclusive eastbound left turn lane at Snelling Avenue/Lydia Avenue with lengthened holding lanes. . One additional exclusive eastbound left turn lane at Snelling Avenue/County Road C-2 with lengthened holding lanes, B, Existing and future year conditions dictate the need to correct for insufficient sight lines at the intersection of Lydia Avenue/Lincoln Drive (College entrance); removal of trees, brush, and berms will be needed to provide adequate sight distances for vehicles exiting the campus, C. Neighborhood concerns about near campus spillover parking on local streets east of Snelling Avenue should be alleviated with implementation of the Master Plan; the parking analysis demonstrates that future peak parking demand will be accommodated by a new parking ramp and underground parking constructed on campus. D. Specific measures to mitigate traffic-related impacts of Master Plan buildout are recommended, including the following: . One additional westbound exclusive left turn lane will be required at the Fairview Avenue/Lydia Avenue intersection to accommodate heavy westbound flows of campus-generated trips at Master Plan buildout. Northwestern College Master Plan PUD Application Report 9 13529.000 . Diverting p.m. peak campus vehicle trips to and from the west via the west gate would greatly reduce vehicle delay at Lydia Avenue/College entrance. . Implementing staggered class hours during the 4:00 to 6:00 p.m. time period and delaying the start times of adult night classes would minimize long queues and corresponding vehicle delay at Lydia Avenue/College entrance in the p.m. peak hour. IV. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT STUDY The College's environment is largely a function of its two lakes, Johanna and Little Johanna, along with ponds and wetlands which occupy a large part of the total land area of the campus. Both lakes are identified as impaired by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). Both lakes are also included on the MPCA's March 31, 2004. proposed Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) list. The TMDL list serves as a comprehensive source of streams and lakes that are not meeting their designated uses because of excess pollutants. Furthermore, Lake Johanna is classified as eutrophic, meaning that is has waters rich in mineral and organic nutrients that promote a proliferation of plant life, especially algae, which reduces the dissolved oxygen content and often causes the extinction of other organisms. Lake Johanna also exhibits water levels from a high of 881.27 feet on July 3, 1978, to 870.35 feet on July 21, 1926, or a range of 10,92 feet, and its Ordinary High Water Level is 878 feet. Little Lake Johanna has very little published information, This Plan presents a campus-wide Stormwater Management strategy that identifies Best Management Practices (BMPs) that can be implemented to facilitate the campus redevelopment. This Plan's overall goal is to cooperate with appropriate agencies including the Cities of Roseville and Arden Hills, Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD), and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to improve the quality of both of the campus lakes. Achievement of these goals will deliver good quality stormwater runoff from the campus to lakes and wetlands at acceptable rates and volumes, while reducing pollutant and sediment loadings, bank erosion, and water quality degradation. Stormwater quality improvement BMPs that seem particularly appropriate for the campus include: wet detention ponds; pollution prevention such as material storage control, turf Northwestern College Master Plan PUD Application Report 10 13529.000 management, parking lot cleaning; pervious pavements to reduce the amount of runoff; infiltration practices and filter devices which primarily trap solids that have pollutants attached to them. In some respects, the implementation of the Plan described in this document will resemble a Storm water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program requires of many Cities including Arden Hills and Roseville. Such a plan has six elements: . Public Education and Outreach . Public Participationllnvolvement . Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination . Construction Site Runoff Control . Post-Construction Runoff Control . Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping During the implementation of the Facilities Plan for the College, stormwater management will be incorporated during detailed design of the campus and implemented during construction phases of the projects proposed in this PUD submission. Regulatory agencies, such as the RCWD, MPCA, and the Cities of Arden Hills and Roseville will be given the opportunity to review plans and comment on stormwater management practices that are proposed. Attached in the Appendix is the Stormwater Management Study prepared in conjunction with this submittal. V. GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN The Stormwater Management Study lays out the framework for utilization of Best Management Practices as individual projects are planned and constructed, Grading and drainage is site specific, and while the Stormwater Management Plan proposes Best Management Practices, the specific measures to be used in the design and construction phases of the campus development are yet to be determined As projects are planned, specific grading and drainage plans will be incorporated into the design and development of the projects. Each City, along with the Rice Creek Watershed District, will review the plans 10 assure compliance with the Surface Water Management Plan and appropriate City and Watershed requirements. Northwestern College Master Plan PUD Application Report 11 13529,000 VI. LANDSCAPING PLAN The Northwestern College campus is characterized by beautiful landscaping, rich vegetation, and green areas. The College will continue to provide detailed landscape planning throughout the development period proposed in this PUD Amendment. The College will reduce potential visual impacts from the removal or relocation of plants, improve and develop open space within the campus (see the Campus Green or Commons), continue with current screening policies to reduce impacts to surrounding residences, and use landscaping opportunities to help improve the environment of the campus and surrounding properties and waters. A VISUAL IMPACT With the proposed improvements to the College, there will inevitably be some changes to the visual landscape that now exists, While there will be removal of some plant materials, the intent is to save as much existing vegetation as is practical. In some areas, plantings will be replaced or relocated, and in other areas, new vegetation will be established. As part of the overall landscaping plan, the College will choose plant species which can provide variety, focus, and ultimately help beautify the campus by providing enhancement to the overall campus design, Where possible, the College will use native species to improve water quality, The campus will also continue to its program to reduce invasive species, especially buckthorn, 8, OPEN SPACE With its plan, the College is creating an open space concept within the campus called the Campus Green. The Campus Green will function as an outdoor gathering place for students, faculty, and staff and will also provide an attractive central open space area where plantings and landscaping will provide continuity and focus on the Campus Green. The intent is to provide a beautiful and functional landscape for the center of the campus. C. SCREENING POLICIES With additions of new buildings and road relocations come modifications to the existing landscape. With these improvements, existing plants providing screening Northwestern College Master Plan PUD Application Report 12 13529.000 may be affected; however, long-term strategies are possible to mitigate these effects. With the goal of providing screening to surrounding residents, the College will consider efforts such as extending existing buffers around the dorms, establishing new vegetation to replace invasive buckthorn, using plants that provide screening year-round, and strategically placing plantings around buildings and dorms to reduce noise and visual impacts. The College will develop a more detailed Landscape Plan as projects proceed, Both tree and shrub species will be chosen for year-round screening, The College has recently completed screening projects on the eastern side of the campus behind Riley Hall. These plantings consisted of four white and four red cedar trees, all between 8 and 10 feet tall. D, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT Landscaping can be multi-functional, serving uses such as stormwater management, erosion control, and water quality improvement. Surface water management can be incorporated into the landscaping plan in the form of rain gardens, environmental issues like erosion can be mitigated with plantings that establish strong root systems, and water quality is improved when vegetation filters sediment and helps slow the rate in which it enters surrounding lake waters. E. LANDSCAPE GUIDELINES 1. The College will continue to reduce the presence of invasive species. especially Buckthorn on the campus, 2. The College will minimize loss of trees, especially old growth Oaks wherever possible 3. The College will preserve existing berms wherever possible, and will extend berms especially on the east side of the campus. 4. The College will plant a variety of coniferous trees along the eastern periphery of the campus. These trees will be a minimum of five feet in height from the top of the root zone. (The College will follow American Nurseryman's Association guidelines in replanting trees.) Northwestern College Master Plan PUD Application Report 13 13529,000 5. Native grasses and understory species will be planted on steep slopes to protect steep slopes, prevent erosion, and improve water quality. 6. The College will employ innovative surface water management techniques wherever possible to beautify the campus setting. VII. BUILDING ELEVATIONS The College has previously developed concept plans for the Life and Health Fitness Center and a new residence hall. These concept plans were included in the PUD Amendment submitted in 1986 by the College. Plans have not progressed for these two buildings beyond the concept design phase. Once plans are fully developed for these and the other proposed buildings on campus, the College will submit plans to Arden Hills and Roseville for review, During the design of the proposed facilities, current architectural guidelines will be followed. Attached in the Appendix are the concept plans from the previous PUD submittal. The College has not yet determined architectural plans for new buiidings, additions, or other structures proposed as part of the Campus Master Plan, The College is committed to continuing the architectural character of the existing buildings on campus and will ensure that new structures are similar in character to the existing campus. VIII. LIGHTING Defined lighting plans will be provided as plans for each building are designed. The College intends to meet and exceed standards with regard to neighboring properties and lighting design standards for both cities will be met Arden Hills' lighting standards indicate requirements for direction, source concealment, intensity and exterior lighting, These requirements will be met, including the requirement that light shall not be cast exceeding a meter reading of 0.4 foot candles on adjoining residential properties. Roseville's design standards state similar requirements with lighting levels not to exceed a meter reading of 0.5 foot candles on adjoining residential properties. Northwestern College Master Plan PUD Application Report 14 13529.000 IX. SETBACKS A. BUILDING SETBACKS FOR A STANDARD LOT City of Arden Hills' requirements for side yard setbacks on a standard lot, if applied to the College, would be met. Side yard setbacks are 10 feet. The setback for the portion of Lower Lake Johanna within Arden Hills is 75 feet. This setback is also met. City of Roseville requirements for front, side, and rear yard setbacks on a standard lot, if applied to the College, would be met. Front and rear setbacks are 30 feet and side yard setbacks are 10 feet. The setback for the portion of Lower Lake Johanna within Roseville is 75 feet. This setback is also met. Setbacks from a storm pond are 10 feet, and all storm ponds on the campus meet this requirement. B. ROAD SETBACKS Lydia Avenue is considered a B-Minor Arterial Road and is an MSA City Roadway. Lydia Avenue fronts the College in Roseville at the corner of Snelling and Lydia. There is not a specific road setback stated, but the front yard setback is 30 feet and the College is well within that requirement. C. LAKE SETBACKS In Arden Hills, Lake Johanna and Little Lake Johanna are General Development Lakes with a structure minimum setback from the ordinary high water mark of 50 feet. Except for impervious walkways, no impervious surfaces shall be constructed within the fifty-foot lake setback, All new construction will adhere to this requirement. In Roseville, Little Lake Johanna is a Recreational Development Lake with a structure setback from the water body at a minimum of 75 feet. Northwestern College Master Plan PUD Application Report 15 13529.000 APPENDIX Master Plan (2003) Partners and Sirny Architects (See separately attached report) Campus Master Plan Scope Map (Summer 2004) Campus Master Plan Scope Map (Revised Fall 2006) Campus Master Plan Scope Map (Revised Fall 2007) Campus Master Plan Figure 4 (2006) TKDA Anticipated General Site Development and Phasing Plan (August 2007) Stormwater Management Plan (See separately attached report) Traffic and Parking Impact Study (See separately attached report) Conceptual Building Plans for Life and Health Fitness Center - Previous PUD Conceptual Building Plans for new Residence Hall. Previous PUD PARTNERS &51 11R,NY December 2003 Mr. Douglas Schroeder Vice President for Business & Finance Northwestern College St. Paul, Minnesota Dear Mr. Schroeder and Dr. Miller, h i t e Dr. Harold Miller Provost Vice President for Academic Affairs Northwestern College St. Paul, Minnesota This planning document describes the basic overview, approach and analyses that have been employed in preparing Northwestern College's Campus Master Plan. From its beginning, this Campus Master Plan was intended to be a planning framework, which can adjust to meet unforeseen changes in the future. We hope this planning exercise will remain active, evoking the participation of faculty, staff and students in shaping their future. It is vital to the future development of the college to rally widespread support in responding to the needs of the campus programs and users. This report makes realistic assessments of physical needs of the college, but also makes some observations in the area of policy and management. This might sound like the study exceeds the confines of the original scope, yet these issues all have implications in utilization of the College's facilities. During the course of our study, it was obvious both in interviews and actual observations that faculty and staff are sincerely dedicated and earnest in their desire to work within the constraints of the existing facilities. It was also obvious that the College's facilities are well kept and help mitigate space issue concerns by providing a clean and supportive environment. On a personal level, I thoroughly enjoyed working on your campus. You have an admirable group of people that truly make the College what it is. They generate a supportive and encouraging atmosphere for all those on campus to absorb, myself included. They were a joy to work with, but more importantly, the type of environment that they create generates an exceptional setting for the students to live and learn in. I'm sure that as students move on, they will carry those values of care and respect with them throughout life. In closing, we wish to thank you for selecting our firm to engage in such an important project for your institution. We also would like to thank those who contributed to the assessment process. We hope the results will meet your expectations and help with effective and efficient campus management, as well as serve as one component of the College's institutional plan. Enthusiastically, PARTNERS & S[RNY LLP LdLlr ce P ge 212 West Franklin Avenue Partners & Sirny L.L.P. Minneapolis Minnesota 55404Archltects & Planners Telephone 612.341.1070 Facsimile 612.341.2124 generaMpartnersandsirny. coin PARTICIPANTS Partners & Sirny would like to especially thank the following North- western College personnel for their assistance. Dr. Alan Cureton Mr. Douglas Schroeder Dr. Hal Miller Dr. Barbara Lindman Participants Mark Baden Ruth Ball Dr. Jerry Beilby Dan Crane John Delich Michael Ek Asa Ferguson Jane Goedeke Monica Groves Matt Hill Dr. Doug Huffman Dr. Barbara Lindman Dr. Hal Miller, Co -Chair Steve Morrow Randy Riesberg Douglas Schroeder, Co -Chair Dale Solberg Cheryl Seiffert Dr. Tim Tomlinson Planning Consultants Partners & Sirny Architects Laurence Page NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE i SUMM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PART I THE PLANNING CHARGE ThePlanning Charge............................................................................................1.1 The Planning Process............................................................................................1.2 TheFacilitiies Plan.................................................................................................1.3 The Institutional Plan............................................................................................1.4 PART II OVERVIEW OF NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE Identification..........................................................................................................2.1 College History and Background.......................................................................2.1 College's Market Position.....................................................................................2.4 Northwestern Radio Network............................................................................. 2.4 College's Organization.........................................................................................2.4 College's Internal Relationships.........................................................................2.6 CampusPopulation..............................................................................................2.6 CampusGrowth.....................................................................................................2.8 College's External Relationships......................................................................2.10 SiteContext...........................................................................................................2.11 LandUse and Zoning..........................................................................................2.12 Existing College Computer System...................................................................2.13 ExistingCampus Utilities..................................................................................2.14 Existing Parking Distribution.............................................................................2.15 PART III PLANNING ISSUES & ANALYSES SiteConstraints.......................................................................................................3.1 Planning Context - Issues Analysis.....................................................................3.2 Facilities & Grounds Related Issues....................................................................3.3 Academic Program Issues.....................................................................................3.5 Academic Area Assignment Summary.............................................................3.17 Academic Program Space Analysis.................................................................. 3.18 Campus Site/ Facilities Capacity....................................................................... 3.19 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE ii Campus Technologies Issues.............................................................................. 3.20 SiteConstraints..................................................................................................... 3.21 PART IV COLLEGE GOALS Mission, Objectives, Accreditation & Affiliations................................................... 4.1 PART V RECOMMENDATIONS General..................................................................................................................... 5.1 Policy........................................................................................................................ 5.2 Image....................................................................................................................... 5.5 Facilities................................................................................................................... 5.7 Operations............................................................................................................... 5.9 Miscellaneous.......................................................................................................5.10 Operations..............................................................................................................5.11 PART VI IMPLEMENTATION Implementations.................................................................................................... 6.1 DevelopmentFramework..................................................................................... 6.2 Phasing.................................................................................................................... 6.3 CostProjections...................................................................................................... 6.4 Costs......................................................................................................................... 6.5 PART VII APPENDICES Glossary.................................................................................................................. A.1 Instructional Space Summaries........................................................................... B.1 MeetingMinutes.................................................................................................. C.1 CampusStudies..................................................................................................... D.1 Facility Data and Resources................................................................................. E.1 D NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE iii I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY E Li Executive Summary Northwestern College is at a precipitous time in its distinguished 100 year plus history. Growth has been remarkable over the last decade, and is a direct commentary on the College's success. That impressive enrollment increase has allowed the College to further spread its word. Moving into its second century, the College appointed a new Presi- dent in 2003. In his relatively short tenure on campus, Dr. Alan Cureton has infused a wonderful sense of energy and enthusiasm that will help guide the future of Northwestern College. The new vision of Northwestern College promotes expansion of its programs, with an enrollment target of 2400 full-time equivalent stu- dents in its traditional programs. This expansion also advances its alternative education programs, and the beginnings of a Masters pro- gram. While supporting the College's mission, the expansion will also provide a new economy of scale to its financial and operational needs. At the same time, the proposed increase in enrollment will exacerbate the current shortage of available space on campus, and as a result, enrollment has been forced to be limited. In response to this situation, the Campus Master Plan used the 2001 Space Utilization Study as a significant stepping -off point. Change is inevitable... planning is a method to direct change. The planning process has reviewed, analyzed and assessed the issues on campus, and with input from all constituencies on campus, has developed a flexible "recipe" for working with space use planning and other significant topics on campus... for current and potential future issues. A yearly review of the Master Plan should assess cur - NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS SUMMA A rent status of the plans goals and objectives, and then updates can be prepared to reflect, and adapt to, changes in the college. Among those discussed in the body of this plan, some of the major expansion issues that the College is faced with include: maintaining and elevating academic quality, academic and non-academic schedul- ing, current site capacity, internal and adjacent land use/ circulation, growing urban forces, campus image (including its marketing and recruitment impact), financial forces as it relates to quality and image of its facilities, recruitment of students and faculty, and the continual moving target of educational technology. As part of this Campus Master Plan, a financial model was developed to outline potential major capital projects costs, and package them into manageable groups. It should be noted, that as ever changing forces impact the college, flexibility of the Plan `Framework' allows the Col- lege to reassess, realign and reorder its facilities priorities... whether that be 5 or 75 years from now. For success of the physical plan, a well conceived Capital Campaign needs to be developed, marketed and diligently managed. To achieve these construction objectives in support of academic goals, college administrators need to "stay the course" with Master Plan goals and objectives. Focusing on both the short term and long term impacts will assure the long term viability of Northwestern College. As any successful institution knows, the Mission is its guiding force. if anything, always test against mission. What is best for the college, so it can continue to spread God's word. With yearly reassessment and diligently staying the course, we believe that this Campus Master Plan will guide Northwestern College well in to the 21st century. A" NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS SUMM.2 THEYLANNING CHARGE THE PLANNING PROCESS u The Planning Charge The firm of Partners & Sirny Architects was retained by Northwestern College to develop a Campus Master Plan that integrated academic planning with facilities planning. This Campus Master Plan was developed in response to the charges set by the leaders of Northwestern College (NWC). Accordingly, the Plan was to understand and develop solutions for the physical needs and operational potentials of the College in light of issues affecting the col- lege. The major issues include: 1. Significant increase in enrollment over recent years 2. Enrollment limit expanding to 2,400 average FTE 3. Increasing integration of educational and administrative operations with technology 4. Campus physical capacity The planning charge/ directives were also influenced by general issues on campus. Among them: • organization and operation • coordination with local developments • internal and external relationships • improvements in circulation • characteristics of student population Among others, the Campus Master Plan was to examine and reflect: • the inventory of site and building use • student enrollment projections • space utilization (taken from Space Utilization Study of April 2001) • analysis of projected facilities needs • campus' ability to expand • evaluation of the campus image and visibility • confirmation of campus goals • recommendations for campus development • cost estimates for the recommendations NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 1.1 2M The Planning Process Facilities planning concerns itself with shaping the environment for humans, therefore its success depends on people who make planning work. Consequently, effective planning is participatory planning. The planning process for this master plan was a highly participatory pro- cess. At the beginning of the planning process, the Planning Commit- tee was established to facilitate the College's participation in the plan- ning process. Interviews of the various academic S t alt e g y P h a e s programs and administrative staff were undertaken in the early weeks of the study. The planning team then reviewed existing information about academic programs, class scheduling, registration data, operating procedures, surveyed the extent and capacity of the physical plant, received student enrollment history and placement data. Traffic and zoning, utilities and develop- ment data were obtained from city agencies. The purpose was to iden- tify, analyze and clarify issues of concern and basic goals and reconcile them with one another, if possible, within the context of the Campus Master Plan. Cataloging the existing needs and physical resources enabled the plan- ning team to estimate the capacities of the existing plant, evaluate its flexibility to absorb additional growth in enrollment and approximate the extent for expansion. NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 1.2 Working committee members were selected to represent views of the faculty and staff, to help identify issues and the goals which were to set planning directions and targets. They participated in the reviews of Plan planning stages, development pro- meT,iorlc posals and commented on them. This planning process is not fore- ;(QnfthR@ Lr -Plan casting. It intends to provide a planned framework which would guide the college's development Target for the next decade. It should serve � n o as a guidebook of strategies for those leaders of the College who concern themselves with the devel- opment of the entire or part(s) of ,,ndarles the College considering the goals the College set for itself. Interviews of the various academic S t alt e g y P h a e s programs and administrative staff were undertaken in the early weeks of the study. The planning team then reviewed existing information about academic programs, class scheduling, registration data, operating procedures, surveyed the extent and capacity of the physical plant, received student enrollment history and placement data. Traffic and zoning, utilities and develop- ment data were obtained from city agencies. The purpose was to iden- tify, analyze and clarify issues of concern and basic goals and reconcile them with one another, if possible, within the context of the Campus Master Plan. Cataloging the existing needs and physical resources enabled the plan- ning team to estimate the capacities of the existing plant, evaluate its flexibility to absorb additional growth in enrollment and approximate the extent for expansion. NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 1.2 Academic Plan THE PLANNING CHARGEW I Space survey data (see previous Space Utilization Study of April 2001) helped understand existing space use patterns. The team researched space planning guidelines used in education programs of other states and observed teaching functions in progress. Space demand and data analyses were conducted and used in assessing program space require- ments and in making recommendations. Also, space utilization was reviewed in conjunction with other collegiate space utilization studies. Additionally, space quality as it facilitates the educational program and safety considerations were reviewed. The administrative organization of the College has been highly stable. Along the desired trait of stability was the issue concerning "cluster- ing" of programs, facilitating potentials of coring classes and sharing resources were strong motivations for suggesting "like" programs/ classes/ offices to be adjacent to each other. need to be reviewed periodically Facilities to insure consistency and proper Utilization design response to the educational & character _ needs governing at the time of the design. INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN The Facilities Plan The purpose of this Campus Master Plan is to ensure that the College's physical environment suits the needs and requirements of the users and facilitates the edu- cational work and efforts of those who operate within the institu- tion's mission and boundaries • sets the course for an orga- nized approach to the College's development • helps the institution deal with changes in an organized, rational manner while adhering to guid- ing goals and objectives NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 1.3 THE PLANNINGCHARGE I brings together existing resources and projected needs establishes departure points for an on-going planning effort. The Institutional Plan A Facilities Plan is the physical component of a comprehensive Institu- tional Development Plan. As the chart above indicates, an overall Insti- tutional Plan would provide a framework for the separate systems to function together as a coordinated whole. In an educational institution, the direction of the institution is usually set by the academic endeavors. All other functions are auxiliary to the educational endeavors and exist to support them. The educational goals are supplemented by financial and facilities goals and, properly oriented, all dovetail into the overall mission of the institution. Education in a system should not suffer from unequal resources. The purpose of an Institutional (Campus) Development Plan is to: ... correlate the human, educational, financial, physical and intangible elements of the educational environment into an optimal relationship within the institution. Used to its potential, the Institutional Development Plan becomes a formidable tool in the hands of the College's administration to manage limited resources and to promote the image of a well -organized institu- tion. It may also assist in obtaining funding for the endeavors of an organization that can identify its physical limitations and one which knows where it is going. Coordinated by the Institutional Plan, facilities planning will be tied to institutional goals, program objectives, financial limitations and plans, and organizational and manpower planning. Subplans prepared for these individual, major functions should integrate the units into a com- prehensive system of planning and management. Periodic Review & Monitoring of Plan Implementation In order to make such reviews effective, data and methods should be documented and maintained as the college implements this plan: 1) data on basic inventory, space need projections, student enrollment, space use and station utilization, and the like be maintained by the director for facilities planning 2) a Facilities Planning Committee take "ownership" of the plan, oper- ate on a scheduled basis, and use the Master Facilities Plan as a ref - NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 1.4 r AL FACILITIES DATA Ass ssme t THE PLANNINGCHARGE 0 I erence for all projects implemented on campus 3) planning issues be inventoried, discussed, analyzed and resolved in terms of the Facilities Master Plan 4) the College's planning goals as outlined in this report be reviewed to insure their validity 5) the College's facility planner update plan elements, prepare/ commission necessary studies and guidelines, review other consul- tant studies, and guide development conformance with the Campus Master Plan 6) the Campus Master Plan be considered as a working document that is reviewed and updated as a continuous cycle Operational Issues, Growth Issues, Trends Q PF@@(@Zo off Thlom 9ftV Academic Goals, Other Goals Q@ac7@0§@ 90410t oflgo physkog FffloOfflas Planning Cycle NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 1.5 OVERVIEW OF NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE E. 11 Identification Northwestern College is incorporated under the laws of the State of Minnesota as a College of the Bible, Arts and Sciences, and Professional Education. It is registered with the Minnesota Higher Education Ser- vices Office (MHESO). College History and Background The College was established as Northwestern Bible and Missionary Training School at First Baptist Church of Minneapolis on 2 October 1902. The founder and first president of Northwestern was Dr. William Riley, pastor of First Baptist Church. From 1902 to 1924, Northwestern class- rooms and administration functions were housed in the educational buildings of First Baptist Church. In 1924, Northwestern moved from the church to Jackson Hall, specifically built to accommodate both church and school programs. The institution experienced major growth from 1902-1947. The Northwestern Theological Seminary was established in 1935, and the College of Liberal Arts in 1944. Collectively, the Bible School, Theological Seminary and College of Liberal Arts were known as "The Northwestern Schools". In 1948, Northwestern moved to the new Memorial Hall, a large multi-purpose building across from Loring Park near down- town Minneapolis. In 1949, President Billy Graham helped established KTIS radio station as an outreach ministry affiliated with Northwestern College. In 1951, the Bible School became a degree -granting institution by adding a fourth year to the three year curriculum. Degrees granted were: Bachelor of Arts, Bachelor of Bible and Bachelor of Theology (Seminary). In 1956, the Seminary and the Bible College closed, and Northwestern Schools became Northwestern College. In 1970, Northwestern pur- chased a former Roman Catholic seminary campus in its present loca- tion. Classes began on the new campus in 1972. Campus buildings included Nazareth Hall (1921) and Riley Hall (1961). Enrollment increased dramatically from 209 full time equivalent (FTE) students in 1972 to 1,547 in 2000 (1630 FTE in Fall 2003). As a result, several new buildings were added. They include: Moyer Residence Hall; Hartill / Knutson Residence Halls and Robertson Student Center (1980); Totino Fine Arts Center (1982); Berntsen Resource Center (1992); Ericksen Center (1996). For further historical perspective, refer to the excellent document titled, 'a cloud of witnesses', that was prepared by the college for its 100th Anni- versary. NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 2.1 Il, Recent Changes Governance and Organization In 1989, there were three vice presidents, which included Academic Affairs, Administration and Auxiliary Services (which included radio ministry). Currently, there are four vice presidents, which are Aca- demic Affairs, College Administration, Development and Radio. Also, there is also an Assistant Vice President for Business and Finance. The academic organizational structure has changed from 6 divisions to twelve departments, thus allowing more specialization within disci- plines. Human Resources The student body has grown from 908 FTE in 1988 to 1,547 in 2000. This is a 707o increase over 12 years. (Note: Fall 2003 enrollment was 1630 average FTE.) Over the same 12 year period, faculty has increased from 45 full-time and 31 part-time members, to 82 full-time and 96 part-time in 2000. Catalogue says 69 FT and 28 PT. Self Study says 70 FT and 50 PT in 1998. In 1989, 427o of faculty held terminal degrees, and in 2000, % of faculty held terminal degrees. Financial Resources In 1997, the Board of Trustees established the Northwestern Founda- tion, a separate 501(c)3 corporation to secure, receive and manage gifts to Northwestern College and Radio. Physical Resources The Berntsen Resource Center was constructed in 1992, and the Erick - sen Center was constructed in 1996. Two existing apartment buildings adjacent to campus property were purchased for student residences: South Campus in 1992 and South- east Campus in 19988. Reynolds Field, a 10 acre outdoor athletic complex was built in 1997, and in 1997, 6 regulation tennis courts were built near the Ericksen Center. The Child Development Center was established in The Commons of EagleCrest Retirement Community (directly south of Lydia). In 1997 the Denler Art Gallery was completed in the Totino Fine Arts Center. NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 2.2 OVERVIEW OF NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE II Institutional Resources The Campus Technologies Department has been reorganized, the campus has been wired for network access, number of computers has increased substantially, and support staff has been increased to reflect the increases. Academic Programs Two majors were combined, ten new majors were added, and eight minors were added. Majors that were added include: Art Education, Finance, International Business, Children's Ministries, Social Studies Education, English as a Second Language, Spanish, Biology and His- tory. In 1996, the Board of Trustees voted to convert to a semester based cal- endar, beginning in 1999. Non -Traditional Programs FOCUS and Center for Distance Education were established. FOCUS was designed to meet the needs of working students who have com- pleted approximately two years of college. Five majors are currently offered. The Center for Distance Education enables students to complete col- lege coursework for credit through instructional packets, audio tapes, video tapes and the Internet. Currently, one major is offered. Student Support Services In 1993, the ALPHA Center was established to provide services for stu- dents academically at risk, to assist students to meet their academic goals, and as a site for students who need alternative forms of testing. In 1993, the College established the office of Racial and Ethnic Diver- sity on Campus (REDOC) to create a more supportive environment for diversity. In 1998, the College established the Disabilities Office of Support Ser- vices (DOSS) to better serve students with special needs. Northwestern College Radio Three additional stations have been added, including Sarasota, Florida; Madison, Wisconsin; and Arnold / Sacramento, California. Northwestern College's Market Position Northwestern College identifies itself as a private Christian College of the Bible, Art and Sciences, and Professional Education. It is a theo- logically conservative Christian college with a strong focus on integra- NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 2.3 OvERviEW OE NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE II tion of faith, learning and living within its educational programs and throughout the student's academic experience. The Board of Trustees, administration, faculty and students embrace an educational philos- ophy in which the arts and sciences and the disciplines are studied within the context of a biblically -based Christian worldview. Northwestern Radio Network Northwestern College owns and operates a noncommercial network of Christian radio stations as an integral part of its total educational ministry. Northwestern College and Northwestern Radio Network are both governed by the same Board of Trustees and share facilities on the same campus. Both organizations operate with separate staffs and separate financial budgets and accounts. Northwestern Radio presents an image of Northwestern to the com- munities it serves. It reaches beyond the community to provide inspi- ration, instruction, spiritual growth, and service opportunities. Clearly, many people identify and familiarize themselves with Northwestern College via the Radio network. Moreover, it is notable that approxi- mately 90 percent of Northwestern students live in one of the College's listening areas. The first radio station within the network was KTIS, established in 1949 under the direction of Billy Graham. The network has increased to 14 AM and FM stations, and is part of a 250 -affiliate satellite network. College's Organization Educational Departments and Programs Art & Graphic Design Bible Business Administration Art Graphic Design Biblical Studies Associate in Arts & Bible Certificate in Bible Accounting Finance General Business International Business Management Information Systems Marketing Communication Broadcast & Electronic Media (B.S.) Broadcast & Electronic Media (Certif.) Communication NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 2.4 UVERViEw6F NORTHWESTERN! iiEA Education Comm'cation Arts/ Literature Education Early Childhood Education Elementary Education ESL Education Mathematics Education Music Education (B.M.E.) Physical Education Social Studies Education Visual Arts Education Kineisology English &Literature English Teach English as Second Language History &Related Fields History Modern Languages & Culture Spanish Music General Music (B.A.) Music Performance (B. Mus.) Psychology Psychology Social Science Science & Mathematics Biology Mathematics Mathematics/ Engineering Dual Degree Pre-Engineering Alternative Education FOCUS Degree Distance Education Academic Support Library Academic Computing Academic Learning Assistance (ALPHA) Campus & Outreach Ministries Chapel Discipleship Ministries Christian Outreach Student Missions Fellowship Student Development Commuter Life Residence Life Health Service Northwestern Student Association Campus Services Dining Services Campus Store Career Development Center Counseling Services NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 2.5 OVERVIEW OF NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE II Campus Activities Alumni Activities Intercollegiate Athletics Intramural Athletics Cheerleading Drama Arts Forensics Music Student Broadcasting Student Publications (The Northwestern Column and the Scroll) Auxiliary & Support Services Facilities Office College's Internal Relationships 01/30/2003 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 2.6 OVERVIEW OF NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE II Campus Population (Fall 2000) Average Age 20 Full-time Equivalent (FTE) Students 1,547 Total Enrollment 1,568 Total Men 609 Total Women 959 Full-time Men 586 Full-time Women 937 Part-time Men 23 Part-time Women 22 Married Students 46 Students Receiving Veterans' Benefits 14 Note: Enrollment is highest in adjacent states, and also in states where NWC Radio stations are located. 0 WA Student Origins (Fall 2000) OR ' CA o 1 MI • 2Y N 15 WY 14 5 q{. RI PA NV ° 5 UT�,;� NE OH 4 J 3 DE 'CA WV VA MD ��: 2Z55 KS MO 4 KY 1 NC 1N 3 AZ NM 0 AR 1K SC 1 1 CA AL GA TX LA 15 1 1 AK 4 6 2 FL Hl 0 3 Foreign Students 44 0 Countries 23 NWC Radio Stations o NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 2.7 Campus Population Growth The continued growth of the student population at Northwestern Col- lege is a time of both excitement and concern for the College. The increase in population has allowed the College to reach a wider audi- ence in which to spread its word. On the other hand, the population is placing a burden on existing campus facilities, which are already beyond capacity. The College has a 1,600 average FTE (full-time equivalent) limit imposed by the City of Arden Hills. The College was at 1,547 FTE in the school year 2000-2001. Refer to the table below, 'Population Growth', and one can see the strong FTE growth curve (10.1% over the last 5 years)). Note that the points of convergence indicate where there was a space short- age, and as a result, buildings were built to accommodate the popula- tion. (Note: As part of this planning process, it has been determined that the current site has the capacity for approximately 2,400 FTE.) There are significant decisions on the immediate horizon regarding FTE limitation. Enrollment will have to be limited if new facilities are not built to accommodate growth. How the College responds to this impending issue will affect the institution well into the future. Population Growth 350,000 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 GSF NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 2.8 mill monsoon MEN I 1,600 smile Illinois N I i,400� MEN IPJNIIIIIII 1,000 8001 600 MEN 40 . 0 200 111 350,000 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 GSF NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 2.8 OVERVIEW OF NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE E II Campus Enrollment 6 Vocal -Classroom 11 (Fall 2000) 24 Music Performance Composition 1 Enrollment by Major Men Women Total Accounting 11 12 23 Art 10 27 37 Biblical Studies 31 43 74 Biology 31 43 74 Broadcast & Electronic Media 23 12 35 Business,General/Business Admin 40 43 83 Children's Ministry 0 8 8 Christian Education 7 18 25 Communication 37 47 84 International Business 7 10 17 Kineisology 18 21 39 Management — CIS Emphasis 1 1 2 Management Information Systems 29 9 38 Marketing 15 11 26 Mathematics 8 7 15 Mathematics, Dual Degree 4 0 4 Mathematics Education 11 9 20 Ministries 7 11 18 Music, General 7 10 17 Visual Arts Education 2 16 18 Youth Ministries 41 28 69 AAB 3 7 10 AASB Broadcast & Electronic Media 2 1 3 AASB Business Administration 1 0 1 AASB Office Technology 0 1 1 Certificate in Bible 0 0 0 Pre -Engineering 7 1 8 Undeclared 20 17 37 Special Student 1 3 4 Music Education Instrumental -Classroom 6 Vocal -Classroom 11 No Concentration 24 Music Performance Composition 1 Instrumental Performance 3 Piano Performance 6 Vocal Performance 12 No Concentration 7 Social Science Criminal Justice 29 Psychology 17 Sociology 1 History 2 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 2.9 OVERVIEW OF NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE II College's External Relationships The College has many relationships with organizations and institutions external to the College. It is important that these relationships are not pushed to the background. They can affect the academic opportuni- ties, public relations, accreditation and certifications and recruitment amongst many others. National :hristian College Athletic Assoc (NCCAA) , Upper Midwest Athletic Conf (UMAC) Minnesota State Board of Teaching Nationnal Assoc of Schools of Music North Central Assoc of Colleges & Schools National Assoc Intercollegiate Athletics Cooperating Libraries in Consortium (CLIC) MINITEX Library Information Network Jerusalam University College Center for Distance Education FOCI Pathwa NWC Urban Outreach Evangelical Council for Financial Accountability Council of Independent Colleges Association of Chritian Schools International Council for iristian Colleges & Universities Evangelical Training Association NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 2.10 NWC Radio NWC Network KTIS + 8 other Stations Board of Directors Skyllight '+-: Network Evangelical Council for Financial Accountability Council of Independent Colleges Association of Chritian Schools International Council for iristian Colleges & Universities Evangelical Training Association NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 2.10 s RK Site Context NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 2.11 Land Use and Zoning The College is currently allowed to operate based on a Conditional Use Permit (Roseville and Arden Hills). It would be desirable for the College to be in a fixed 'Institutional' zoning district, so that the governing factors of property use are set and not conditional. (Note: a Conditional Use Permit can be withdrawn at any time if conditions of the permit are not honored.) Also, the College property is located in two municipalities, Roseville and Arden Hills. The fact that they are located in two cities can exac- erbate the College's ability to use the property to its best advantage. (To mitigate any potential problems the College may want to explore joint control with Roseville and Arden Hills.) From a big picture perspective, the long range viability of NWC should be examined in context of adjacent land use and increasing urban pressure on the College's site. Roseville Comprehensive Guide Plan Comprehensive Plan FHeam last/ Use Map w11h 19% ReAwslepume Plr Cwempe OwAey .M-ro�"QXct NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 2.12 OVERVIEW OF NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE II ii Parking;bistribotion 0 a l r\�,��3 /�4fJj'��'•e 83 \ 1 I k67 J L! i Vo ff , i LIE Parking is evenly dis- tributed on campus for the most part. How- ever, athletic events can tax parking stalls in vicinity of the athletic fields. In Out I NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 2.13 OVERVIEW OF NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE II Existing College Computer Systems The Northwestern College Campus Technologies Departments work closely with individual users and campus departments to provide the technology services and infrastructure necessary to support the tech- nology and information needs of the Northwestern campus commu- nity. Northwestern's Campus Technology organization consists of the following five departments: 1. Information Technologies Department: provides campus networking and PC support 2. Academic Technologies Department: provides support to assist faculty utilize technology in the teaching/ learning process. NWC Campus Technologies Departments NWCVice President _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ President Academics Asst VP for / Technology / I Dean of Curr ic & Instruction BRC (Library) Director Information Help Telecomm Info AcademicFaculty Systems Desk Technology Technology Teachingll earning Technology Committere Applications/Operations Infrastructure PC Desktop l hnoo Team Support Team Technology Database Operations Steering Committee Web Development "Technology Zone" Instructional Technology Center 3. Information Systems Department: provides solution support to campus departments such as accounting, student accounts, admis- sions, financial aid, advising, etc. 4. Telecommunications Department: provides campus telephone sup- port 5. Help Desk: provides one-stop source of referral and / or help for tech- nology and telecommunications questions, issues, or problems. NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 2.14 ;hwestern College Campus Buried Cabling (best estimate) - Spring, 1999 and prior :fling Avenue L<� Fiber in a tunnel ma E - Phone Cable ---------------Cable TV Phone Cable In a tunnel ---------- Electric —tt• The above diagram is one of several that documents known telecomm connections and buried cable on campus. This map should only be used for general planning purposes. Once a project is more solidified, engineering and survey drawings should be used. Field verification is also a way of confirming locations. NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 2.15 19 Existing Utilities This utilities map illustrates the major known utilities on campus. (See separate diagram for telecomm lines.) This map should only be used for general planning purposes. Once a project is more solidified, engineer- ing and survey drawings and should be used. Field verification is also a way of confirming locations NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 2.16 MM g ANALYSES III NORTH'WE$.TERN,-.COLLEGE. -CAMPUS--. MASTER, 'PLAN. - PARTNERS • & `. SI"RNY ARCHIT;ECTS S.E.CTION.. III PLANNINGISSUES & ANALYSES III edge for not only space issues, but also as some basic information for academic planning. Presentations with supporting documentation were made by Commit- tee members for the areas they represent. Also, Committee members were contacted for clarifications and additional information. As well, numerous follow-up contacts were made with staff and faculty to clar- ify issues. A key of major importance in establishing the non-physical scope of the study will be to develop the method of communicating issues and input to the planner. In order to obtain the widest possible user input into the planning process, the technique of issue analysis was be employed. Physical Context A Facilities Plan examines the current and future needs of the College in physical terms and it recommends a rational physical response to deal with those needs as they relate to the College's functions. Such a campus plan, however, would not be limited to the jurisdictional boundaries of the institution. Rather it would look at the broader con- text of the College's relationship to surrounding neighborhoods, to the city, indeed to the entire area the College serves. Physical planning for the College, therefore, considered a variety of geographic contexts and perspectives from the cities to the immediate built-up areas of the campus. The entire planning process in general, but the planning base inventory in particular, will utilize a variety of information to map the campus and its environs. This allows the vari- ous elements of the campus to be studied at appropriate levels and thus develop a coordinated perspective of the institution within the city and in relation to the "hinterland of the College." Non -Physical Context In addition to looking at the physical needs of the institution, it is neces- sary to identify issues and potential problems dealing with non-physi- cal concerns such as the administrative structure, the decision making process, finances, teaching methods, academic aspirations and relation- ships, social responsibilities, and the like. When investigating such non-physical areas as programm-ing, admin- istrative structure and decision making, only the "issues" can be iden- tified at this time. In other instances, however, such as in academic departmental relationships, specific recommendations can be formu- lated. NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 3.2 PLANNING ISSUES & ANALYSES III Campus - Wide Issues (Note: Interviews of faculty/staff by planning consultant were conducted in Spring 2001 Academic & Policy 1. Waiting lists have developed partially because of the school's limi- tations to accept more students . 2. It must be stressed that the College look at all issues in context of the College's Mission and long range institutional plan. 3. Space will limit total student enrollment, and not just in traditional day programs 4. Space will limit total student enrollment, and not just in traditional day programs Facilities & Grounds Related Issues Facilities 1. Students are receiving a quality education, although there are already some compromises due to space limitations. Space will limit total student enrollment. Space will affect course availability, including both day and evening time periods. 2. Establish an on-going, formal process to deal with future space needs and space requests. 3. "Squeeze" on class day hours available for maintenance and repair will further stress access time. Forces repair and replacement to holiday and summer periods; staff time off at holidays taxes issue; summer occupancy of dorms also taxes issue. 4. Biggest conflict is one academic need versus another academic need. 5. Unscheduled spaces are not available for emergencies. (Note: some institution's policies plan 27o of total space as "down" for remodel- ings, relocations, emergencies, etc.) 6. Use of Gold Room? Currently, total space is 1,535 ASF which is large enough for 2 classrooms; either split into two classrooms or re -furbish for use as small theatre. 7. Need for "Central Store" for bulk purchases, equipment reserves, dorm replacement items such as appliances, etc. Some standards propose 1-27o of ASF for a Central Store. 8. Although not a space/ square footage issue (does put square foot- age pressure due to avoidance of use), non -air conditioned spaces can be difficult to teach and learn in (especially in Summer School; also hard to sell to outside groups). Rooms include: Classroom N458 Gold Room (N222) Classroom R201 (Continuing Ed) Nazareth Old Gym (all spaces) Classrooms R202, R205 and R206) Nazareth Chapel Biology Lab N206 Guitar Studio (N388) Physics Lab N210 Voice Studio N464 Language Lab N416 Piano Studio N466 PC Computer Lab (N117, N119 and N121) Riley Gymnasium (all) Youderian Lounge NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 3.3 PLANNINGISSUES& ANALYSES III 9. 'Institutional' level quality of building materials has an initially higher cost, but the true 'life cycle cost' reflects the true lower cost. (cavity wall construction, window construction meeting air infiltration standards, built-up roof standards, exterior ductwork insulation, indoor air quality, etc.) 10. There are some particularly significant code issues. Particularly egregious are existing corridors that should have the code required 1 -hour fire protection. Common air return in corridors (doors, air transfer, HVAC balance) is an especially acute problem. 11. Even small renovations will require meeting statutory require- ments which have associated costs (ex. asbestos abatement, sprin- kler systems, rated corridors, air exchanges, etc.). Grounds/Operational Services Further "squeezing" and extension of the school day will produce addi- tional stress on setup and cleaning time: a. "adult" seating takes more time to clean; less time during day. b. setup time availability. Ex. may need 6 people to set up in 20 minutes rather than 2 people over 60 minutes. c. Custodial space very short; especially for new, larger more effi- cient equipment; as well, IT has needed to take some of the space. (Note: Long Range Plan for IT integrated with other interests on campus?) d. Access to classrooms/labs for cleaning; overtime pay for off - hour times available for cleaning?; Few lounges on main campus proper places cleaning burden due to food in classrooms and labs; squeeze on day will further restrict cleaning access time. (Develop policy for food use in buildings?) Parking is tight for normal use by faculty, staff and visitors, as well as dorm students. Before re -active response of squeezing in one here and one there, need to look at overall impact of adding parking spaces. (Long range campus FTE capacity, site capacity, future buildings if any, aesthetics as part of campus life, etc.) May have to institute parking restrictions (many options for classes of restrictions). Parking issue makes access for snow plowing difficult. Athletic and special events are a particularly difficult problem (student dorm parking, alumni back on campus, invited guests, etc.). Deferred Maintenance Plan A cursory review of the College's Deferred Maintenance Plan was per- formed. In general, the report was well done, but predominantly engi- neering oriented. The report should be tempered with an architectural perspective to maintain architectural integrity of campus. Comments included the following: 1. Asbestos allowance seems quite low 2. No mention of rated corridor reqmts. Ex: Riley at Pres office. 3. Interior architectural finishes and materials should be consistent with the image and quality of the college. NWC needs balance NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 3.4 PLATNING ISSUES & ANALYSES III appropriate materials in conjunction with costs, both front end and long term. 4. How does workplan account for inflation? Events Services 1 Difficult to meet all needs due to availability pressure from many differ- ent interests on campus. 2 Pressure from academic needs versus music performances and special events; is there need to re -assess goals and objectives for potential con- flicts as they relate to academic mission and ministry/ outreach mis- sion? Academic Program Issues 1. A limit on enrollment has been established due to existing facilities capacity. 2. Current demographics indicate that traditional college age students are peaking within the next 2 or 3 years. How will this affect the enrollment increases that NWC has been experiencing over the last 5 to 10 years? By Department Art & Graphic Design 1. Faculty: 3 FT and 4 PT 2. Have 56 Art majors this year, normally plan for 40-45; have 94 in Art Appreciation, prefer 48. 3. Art Department enrollment has increased from 41 students in 1990 to 57 students in 1995, and 130 students in 2000. (a 217% increase over 10 years, and a 1287o increase over the last 5 years) How long will this last. 3. Feeling pinch for space in current Totino fine Arts Building areas. (Space was built in 1982 when college was 700 total students.) Too many classes in one space 4. In temporary space, no investment in safety, equipment, air quality. Air quality a major concern due to art processes. Examples: air quality in printmaking; concern for open flame with wood structure; bronze pours in parking lot (seasonal weather and restrictions). 5. Discussed Nazareth Gym space conversion as permanent solution (cur- rent temporary home) into two levels of instructional space. Upper level could make nice art spaces due to large volume and daylight. Could hold: a) Sculpture / 3-D Design Studio, b) Kiln / Foundry Room, and c) Drawing/ 2-D Design Studio. 6. Students complain difficult to set up projects for long enough periods of time. 7. Students perceive that the College's view on its instructional facilities is a reflection of how the College feels about its students. NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 3.5 PLANNING ISSUES & ANALYSES III Bible 1. Faculty 10 FT, 3 PT in department; 10-12 adjunct; 5-6 work study. 2. Integrating core for all academic disciplines: "Hub". 3. Storage: articles, computer hardware, most offices have closets. 4. Classroom presentations mostly 'Power Point" type; some over- head. 5. Large classrooms hard to come by; need space for 40-50; 30 sections of Freshman, 10 upper division. Goal for Bible languages is 20-25 students / 6 workstations, especially in Language. 6. Pedagogy: straight ahead lecture one of several methods. Business & Accounting 1. Currently 225 students; expect 250 in next 5-10 years. Second larg- est department. 2. Feels pinch for classrooms. (This is part of total campus aggregate need for generic classrooms.) 3. Feels need for one computer lab. 4. If student population increases to 250, would need one more full- time faculty and office. 5. Department Head needs administrative assistant; area for same. 6. Intro to Marketing class for 50 people in very poor classroom, but only once every semester or so. Christian Education 1. Currently 4 faculty, will add 2. 2. Field experience — need to add one administrative assistant Theatre 1. Further pressure if Theatre minor/ major ever offered; synergy with Music programs? Maranatha operations? 2. Several year calendar for Maranatha events must be meshed with Theatre academic needs. 3. Need to balance academic needs with event needs – integration of two entities? Continue to assess conflicts between Theatre instruc- tional lab needs versus Maranatha performance needs. (schedules, set up times required for different types of events, type of person- nel, student workers, etc.). Pressure for building stage sets and the- atre students' practice time are in opposition to "road house" style operation of Maranatha. 4. Need for Rehearsal Hall (teaching space). 5. Conflict of training and education between Theatre Department trained stage personnel and Maranatha trained personnel. If The- atre were to become minor, could Theatre department train Mara- natha personnel? 6. Theatre Scenery Workshop / Storage out -building. It seems that this does not totally solve Maranatha conflict – need for co -location of stage sets and rehearsal time. (Separate issues? Provides instruc- tional lab for teaching stage set building, but duplication of efforts? Confirm issues.) 7. Planning for types of scenery: permanent (less flexible and less expensive), temporary, movable/reps (more flexible, but more NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 3.6 PLANNING ISSUES & ANALYSES III timely to plan and more expensive), etc. How to budget? 8. Concern over equipment purchase expense and quality between Theatre Department versus Maranatha; coordinate equipment pur- chases. Communication 1. Population: 130 students 10 FT faculty 3+ adjunct faculty 2. Critical needs: a. WVOE has no instructional lab for teaching radio lab; space used is substandard and undersized; consideration for re -use of current Radio Station space since technology, sound -proofing is in place. (Note: Former KTIS subsequently converted to aca- demic offices.) b. Need Lab/ demo classroom with technology. c. Need lab / resources for Comm Tech/ Web Design; combine with Journalism, Web, Dig Video, etc.; workshops for Column, Scroll, web, etc. Child Development 1. Space is way too small for function as child care center and instruc- tional lab space. 2. State guidelines prescript SF per child, but do not make allowances for use as Lab setting for Child Development educational program (student teachers) at same time. Note that the 35 SF requirement is extremely tight to begin with, let alone adding student teachers and faculty. 3 Currently, 6 students enrolled in program, with 21 students expected next year. They need space to prepare activities, meet/converse with faculty, have faculty observe students in action, store personal effects, etc. 4. Requests made by Program include the following: Conference space (students, staff, parents), small group space (children/ grandfriend), teacher planning space, Intergenerational Coordinator's Office and Director's Office. 5. Current space consists of 1,252 ASF for child care spaces and 297 ASF for offices. State Department of Health requires 35 SF per child (not including office space, miscellaneous spaces, cabinets, tables, etc.). The center is licensed for 38 students (12 toddlers and 26 pre-school). (Overload of 42 children requires use of Center's Parlor for which there is no formal arrangement according to center staff.) (NOTE: Calculations indicate that current space does not meet Board of Health rules: 35 SF x 38 students = 1,330 SF. Only 1,252 SF available per NWC space inventory. Need to verify.) 6. Currently, lack of Office space compromises operation. Main Office which is designed for 2 people is used by 4-5 people. Also, seven teachers using equivalent of a "wide window sill" in narrow aisle storage area as office space. NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 3.7 PLANNING ISsuEs & ANALYSES III 7. Note: Classroom space for the Child Development Educational Pro- gram is on main campus. 8. Discussed aspect of Child Care use by non-NWC parents is actually a form of the College's ministry and outreach. 9. Note that State Licensing laws have changed, where previously 'Birth through Grade 3' was not part of Child Development. This will affect student's educational program, which will likely have significant space impacts. 10. There is a desire to also accept Infants at the Center so that student will receive full -spectrum of chilled development. Lack of space currently prohibits this. 11. Discussed possibility of moving Child Development Lab into Radio Building when constructed. Lab would still be close to inter -gener- ational facilities at Presbyterian Homes. Education 1. Health Education potential future major? (currently Minor: licens- ing at State level) How would it affect 2400 FTE limit? Where would space be available? Kinesiology only program not leading to licensing. 2. Fall 2000 FTE = 461 and Fall 2005 projections indicate 525. What does this do to 1,600 FTE campus max? 3. Adding two faculty next year; adding one office person. 4. Need for large group meeting spaces in Spring when Student Teach- ers meet as group; 65-70 students; not formal lecture — need layout space (portfolios, etc.). Frequency? Blue Room a potential? 5. Elementary Art going to two sections; desire to meet in Art area; need computer lab. 6. Dedicated computer lab; Tech Lab uses Mac Lab; content specific; dedicated software; CD-ROM tower. 7. State of Minnesota records filing requirements up to 10 years; verify time period; may be a storage equipment issue. 8. Need access to records for Student Teaching documentation. 9. Confidentially an issue when Work Study are in Work Room. 10. Methods courses need "Demo Classroom" or Seminar type space; "dedicated classroom' for work materials.; need Web access; could be combined with ESL which also needs materials in dedicated classroom. 11. Music Ed puts pressure on Music Department's MIDI Lab; practice rooms also. English 1. Office space a premium; need 1 FT and 1 PT. 2. Classrooms space shortage. 3. Expressed need for large classroom for department chapel or whole department events. (Policy development needs to review this issue within context of whole campus.) 4. Transfer classes increasing in size from 6 up to 12 — no longer can meet in faculty office. (The need for small classrooms appears else - NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 3.8 PLANNING ISSUES & ANALYSES III where on campus.) 5. Parking after 10 AM a problem for supervising student teachers. 6. Issue of furniture types used; reinforces need to develop standard of some sort, but with flexibility for educational delivery methods and teaching styles. History 1. History, Geography, Political Science, Economics (also includes edu- cation majors). 2. Faculty 2 FT, 3 PT; add 1 FT next year; 1 work study per faculty (shares space in faculty office). 3. Standard class: upper division =15-20 (up to 40 max.); senior semi- nar 15-16. Languages 1. Faculty 1 FT Director, 1 FT Spanish, and 4 adjunct 2. Department is smallest on campus, but only 5 years old. 3. Desire to co -locate all spaces (N458, N412, N460) 4. Class size limits: 24 lower level, 12 upper level. 5. Furniture is hodge-podge (due to space shortage?); desire fixed fur- niture (not grouping — "can't teach a duck to quack in a group"). 6. Desires dedicated "classroom"; need for maps, cultural artifacts, etc. 7. Need for popular culture class; "work" language, not "study". Music (also Maranatha activities) 1. A Classroom for 10-12 students for upper level courses would be helpful, in that large classrooms would then not unnecessarily tied up for small size classes. (The need for small classrooms appears elsewhere on campus.) 2. Inappropriate use of Band/ Choir Rooms for lecture classes. Stu- dents must use lap boards. Use of specialty Music as classrooms ties up space for use as lab. 3. It appears that the department is short roughly 5 — 8 practice rooms. 4. Instrument storage space is marginal. 5. Shortage of rehearsal space necessitates use of Nazareth Chapel for ensemble rehearsals. 6. Need was expressed for drama stage setup as instructional lab for theatre students (3-5 weeks); conflicts with Maranatha single per- formance events. Conflicts would increase if/when Theatre Minor ever offered. 7. Shortage of office space. (Music, Art, Communication) Note that Music faculty teaches private lessons in their offices. Need for roughly 6 —10 additional offices based on current loads. Currently, one Music Faculty using Wenger practice module as office. (Note: Office space here, as well as everywhere else on campus, must be reviewed as total campus need due to high Office ASF to FTE ratio.) 8. No Conference Room or Lounge. (Faculty meetings in Classrooms. NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 3.9 PLANNING ISSUES & ANALYSES E III Wedding planning client meetings in corridors) 9. Main Music Office appears crowded. Warrants consideration for expansion and / or remodeling into more efficient layout. 10. Report by Dr. Jack Schwarz (in anticipation of National Associa- tion Schools of Music visit) raises significant criticism for crowding. Both space size and quality are listed as major challenges that affect quality of Music program. Also lists need for higher quality prac- tice room instruments, which will add to space need. Dr. Harold Best also expresses similar concerns in his report for the 2002 NASM visit) 11. Note that Academy of Music adds to total space demand with instruction provided to 309 pre -college students. (Note: 2:30 — 5:30 PM period) Psychology 1. Includes Psychology, Social Science, Criminal Justice, Sociology and Anthropology. 2. Currently 3 faculty, will add 1 now, and 1 later. 3. No major issues. 4. Need Psych Lab with two-way mirror for observation. 5. Considering adding Child Psychology Minor, then Major. 6. Identity an issue; no "home' for psych major. Science & Mathematics 1. 57 majors 2. Faculty 7 FT; add 2 FT next year; 1 FT lab tech; 5 adjunct faculty. 3. Currently 12 lab section, 5 gen ed sections 4. Biology (75 students) has one small lab 935 SF plus prep room of 155 SF =1,090 SR At 50-60 ASF / Sta norm, this projects to a capacity of 18 stations, when actually 24 stations (verify qty.) are currently filled per section; would normally project 1,200 ASF —1,440 ASF for 24 stations. 5. Chemistry (31 students) lab to be remodeled; existing space is 24'-0" x 37-10" which equals 908 ASF. Sections will have 24 stations. Norm is 50-80 ASF / Sta, so 24 stations require 1,200 ASF — 1,920 ASF. 6. Pre -Engineering (12 students) 7. Physics / Geology use 40-60 ASF / Sta Floor is in poor shape. 8. Short of storage space. 9. Long term proposal for two new programs: Biochemistry and Biol- ogy Education major (grades 6-12). Would need one more lab. ALPHA Center 1. New need for adults increasing dramatically. 2. With one large Testing Room, other space issues appear to be layout/ equipment or re -allocation issues. (Review in more detail as an architectural programming effort.) 3. Consider potential for small DOSS tutoring room. NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 3.10 PLANNING ISSUES & ANALYSES III 4. Meeting in BRC Study Room is difficult to oversee and transport materials. Also, takes space out of use for Library. 5. Contact hours = Writing Tutoring: 732 writing tutorials @ 0.5 hour each = 366 hours per semester =15 weeks = 25 WSCH average (not peak loads) Other -Subject Tutoring: 112 tutorials @ 0.5 hour each = 56 hours per semester T 15 weeks = 4 WSCH DOSS Referrals: 4 tutorials for first quad (max.) FOCUS/Pathways 1. Student population: Spring 99 132 (first year) Spring 00 350 Fall 01 400 Average class size is 12-15. (The need for small classrooms appears elsewhere on campus.) Maximum number of groups is 33 starting at one time. Three need computer labs; remainder need classroom space. Only 27 true class- rooms exist on campus. (Does not include 'Personal Enrichment' classes.) Need for classrooms exceeds capacity. 2. Masters Program to be started. Where will its classes meet if Class- room space already tight? 3. Short-term solution is to rent space off campus. 4. Need for "adult" furniture; have had complaints. NOTE: If change is to be made, then "Furniture Standards" should be initiated. Furniture size and shape can drastically affect classroom/lab station capacity. Inappropriate furniture selection can drastically reduce room capacity by up to 25-35%. (This applies to the entire campus.) 5. FOCUS / Pathways not aligned with conventional school year start / end. Scheduling alignment should be reviewed for potential con- flicts aggravating space need. (Institutional policy issue?) 6. Need for conference space expressed due to much one-on-one dis- cussions. 7. Impact of central filing versus individual filing should be reviewed by administrator. (Duplication has a SF impact.) Personal Enrichment 1. Feel space pinch. 2. Confined to 10 rooms, one night a week. 3. Was running 16 different courses comfortably, but now down to 10. Would like to run more. 4. Conflict with FOCUS/ Pathways need for evening classroom space. Meet in Lab space if appropriate and available? Summer School 1. Mostly quality of space issue. 2. Non -air conditioned classrooms used when others have priorities. 3. Wired classrooms not always available when "outside" groups pay NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 3.11 PLANNING ISSUES & ANALYSES III for wired classrooms. Would use of portable projection units solve problem? 4. Events Services has priority when events are planned out years ahead. Distance Education 1. Full time staff = 6, 1 Director Assistant Director: Recruitment and marketing Instructional Designer: Distance Ed based (desk top work) Associate Instructional Designer: Distance Ed based (desk top work) Student Relations Coordinator: student contact during programs; contact with faculty; order books + academic materials Administrative Assistant: basic needs Office Assistant: basic needs 2. 1,000 -1,100 course enrollments 3. Markets: Adult, high school PSEO, traditional age 4. Same course numbers and course length as traditional programs Ties into individual ed. depts. 5. Delivered via print, video and internet - 85% via paper All produced on campus Graduate programs would be non-traditionally delivered 6. Storage: "Just -in -time" supplies coursework, books, etc. 7. Video production a space need Campus & Extension Ministries 1. Will be moving to N389,391 and 393. 2. Two Directors, Coordinator, Office Manager, Staff and work study 3. Numerous events on and off campus; storage for displays and materials. 4. Some small group meetings on campus. 5. Wednesday "Edge" program breaks down into small groups. Registrar 1. Needs to be located directly adjacent to Admissions and Financial Aid due to working relationships. 2. Space concerns appear to result mostly due to space layout and equipment issues. (Note: effective layout may not solve all space problems.) Assess cost of new equipment (highly effective, custom- ized work stations) against major remodeling. Equipment can be reconfigured multiple times more easily. 3. Need to handle a multitude of information media intensifies space need. (electronic data, hard copy data, hard copy signatures [Fed loans, etc.], mail, etc.) Need to handle "semi -accessible" (not ready for archive storage) records an issue. 4. More storage space (or more efficient storage space?) desired. Con- sider 'Compact Storage' as part of solution? (Note: building floor loads have to be calculated by licensed Structural Engineer due to highly concentrated loads of compact storage.) NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 3.12 PLANNING ISSUES & ANALYSES III Admissions .1. "Front Door" to College for prospective students. Layout with split functions adds to ambiguity. Narrow space block available aggra- vates potential layout. 2. Consider consolidation of "Student/ Support Services" into single area for "One Stop Shopping"; needs to be near Admin; could add to visibility to all commonly located entities; may see efficiency of staff; vacated Radio Station space? Accessibility could be an issue. 3. Space concerns appear to result mostly due to space layout and equipment issues; effective layout may not solve all space prob- lems. Assess cost of new equipment (highly effective, customized work stations) against major remodeling. Equipment can be relo- cated multiple times more easily. 4. Need to handle a multitude of information media intensifies space need. (electronic data, hard copy data, hard copy signatures [Fed loans, etc.], mail, etc.) Need to handle "semi -accessible" (not ready for archive storage) records an issue. 5. More storage space (or more efficient storage space?) desired. Con- sider'Compact Storage' as part of solution? Financial Aid 1. No major issues; not ideal, but could be improved. 2. Some cubicles are quite small for specific job functions; some staff should be in enclosed space. (confidentiality) 3. Storage on 3rd floor; storage requirements are now 3 years instead of previous 5 year. 4. Waiting area currently seats 3, could use 5 (peak is 6-8). 5. Discussed desire for co -locating Student Accounts, Admissions, Stu- dent Records and Financial Aid; could use common work study. Career Development 1. Staff: Director Employer Relations Specialist Office Manager Work Study (2 @ one time; total 3) (secure personal items storage) Academic Affairs Internship Coordinator (to be added) 2. Current space size is roughly 15 x 25 (510 SF) Storage upstairs in attic (7 x 15±) used for grad school booklets, handouts, etc. Access 1— 3 times per day (???) 3. Equipment: TV/ VCR (needs clear viewing angle) Projector Photocopy machine Color laser printer Scanner Fax machine Office supplies cabinet 4. Space is tight; student access limited to 15 hours a week; otherwise students must go to Library, then CD staff unable to advise. NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 3.13 PLANNING ISSUES & ANALYSES , III 5. Workshops performed in this area; tightness affects ability to make optimum presentations; when workshop in session, shuts down other activities. 6. Need to separate staff functions from student activities. 7. Every last bit of space used, but more effective room configuration would provide better internal room layout and more functional. Counseling 1. Staff 1 FT, 2 0.25 PT 2. Desire 3rd PT due to FTE increase; served 2270 of population.; norm is 1670 at Christian Colleges. 3. Limited to 10-15 sessions due to facilities limitations. 4. Peak times for student need: post -holiday, before finals and before / around end of school year. Alumni 1. Location, location, location! 2. Confidentiality an issue with work study and others. Need for institutional policy for conference room quantity, location and avail- ability? 3. Consolidate with other areas? Gift Planning, PR, Alumni all together? 4. Strong desire to be in Nazareth near traffic. Gift Planning 1. Surplus of space 2. Consolidate with other together? areas? Gift Planning, PR, Alumni all Public Relations 1. Currently using 5.5 offices with 6.5 staff; will increase to 8.0. 2. High traffic area with outside vendors. 3. Network wiring important; 600-700 print projects a year. 4. Total area could use conference room. 5. Consolidate with other areas? Gift Planning, PR, Alumni all together? Athletics 1. Concern if Riley Gym is converted to classroom and lab space. Pressure of scheduling, availability and maintenance. 2. Parking a problem for events; location, not quantity. Could some spaces be "open' for games; roughly 500 people attend football games. 3. Viewing Room too small for teams; too big for coaches; "right -siz- ing" of facilities. 4. Riley Gym primarily intramural and softball/ baseball practice; 39 events scheduled. 5. Currently rent to church groups on weekends; closing Riley may preclude this; is this a policy issue? Outreach? 6. Concessions clean, but no water; would like to replace, but ... 7. Concerns about use of outdoor fields; football practice on baseball field; wear and tear; artificial turf a solution since natural turf does not have enough time to re-establish itself. NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 3.14 8. Re-arrange fields? 9. Soccer and track at other locations off campus. 10. Weight Room tight; would like to be Fitness Center; space require- ments more for Fitness Center. Student Life 1. Four Deans: Dean of Students Associate Dean of Student Life & Internships Associate Dean Commuter Life Associate Dean Residence Life 2. Health Center; space OK; recently remodeled. 3. Dorm classrooms and lounges have been accounted for in space calcs. 4. Student Government office in Nazareth; office spaces adequate; Main Office tight, especially storage (student files, forms, records, College publications such as Pipeline, Column, academic publica- tions, etc. Business & Finance 1. Finance: VP, Admin Asst, Financial/ Budget Analyst 2. Human Resources: Director, HR Asst, Recruitment Specialist, Ben- efits Specialist, Student Employment Specialist, Office Asst, Trainer (future) 3. College Receptionist 4. Purchasing: Manager, Purchasing Asst 5. Business: Mgr Accounting Ops, Business Office Supervisor, Staff Accountant, Payroll Coord / Staff Accountant, Cashier, Student Accounts Coord, Lead Coord Gift Receipting, Gift Receipting Coord, Gift Receipting/Accts Payable, Accts Payable Coord, Gift Receipt- ing Student Worker 6. General Use Work Station 7. Discussed academic versus financial impact of delaying lap top computer labs until wireless is more dependable in next 2 — 3 years. (Wiring costs, furniture costs, computer support costs, etc.) 8. Consider 'Compact Storage" for some records? Campus Technologies 1 2 3. Includes: Info Services Info Technology Telecom Academic Technology Help Desk Needs expressed: Conference Room, Training/ Classroom, Office for future position, Work bench area for PC's, storage for dead materials (for re -use). Consolidation and proper equipment / work surfaces / storage sys- tems could help resolve some issues. .. NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 3.15 PLANNING ISSUES & ANALYSES III Academic Area Assignment Summary of Assignable Square Footage Use (ASF) ASF SF/FTE Total ASF Instructional Space Art & Graphic Design 7,659 4.79 2.99% Bible 1,351 0.84 0.53% Business Administration 2,700 1.69 1.06% Christian Ministries 893 0.56 0.35% Communication 7,138 4.46 2.79% Education 4,266 2.67 1.677o English & Literature 1,524 0.95 0.60% History and Related Fields 533 0.33 0.21% Modern Languages & Culture 1,391 0.87 0.54% Music 8,985 5.62 3.51% Psychology 898 0.56 0.35% Science & Math 4,845 3.03 1.89% Generic Classroom 20,878 13.05 8.16% Subtotal 63,059 39.41 24.66% Non -Instructional Space Distance Education 2,104 1.32 0.827o Student Support 1,244 0.78 0.49% Student Services 8,665 5.42 3.39% Business Offices 7,529 4.71 2.947o Lounge 8,426 5.27 3.29% Misc 720 0.45 0.28% Academic Support 1,418 0.89 0.55% Library/ Study Spaces 22,169 13.86 8.677o Media Services 1,004 0.63 0.39% Administrative 2,640 1.65 1.03% Auxilliary Services 19,446 12.15 7.60 Campus Technology 26,745 16.72 10.467o Meeting Rooms 5,734 3.58 2.24% Athletics 36,723 22.95 14.36% Radio (KTIS) 5,328 3.33 2.08% Subtotal 121,205 93.68 58.61% NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 3.16 PLANNING ISSUES & ANALYSES III Academic Program Space Analysis A space utilization study was performed in Spring of 2001, and although various spaces around campus have been reconfigured, the major space issues still exist. An overview of the report's findings are outlined below, and if further detail is needed, refer to the space study document. Summary The continued growth at Northwestern College is a time of both excitement and concern for the College. After just a short time on campus, it was evident both in interviews and initial observations that: There is a high level of dedication and earnestness among staff and faculty There are concerted efforts to work within the constraints of the existing facilities After further in-depth investigation and data analysis, it was clear that: 1 Space will affect course availability, including day and evening time periods 2 Space will limit total student enrollment, and not just in traditional day programs 3 Students are receiving a quality education, although there are already some compromises due to space limitations 4 Space limitations include areas that a) need better spatial organiza- tion to achieve more efficient use of available space, b) exhibit inappropriate use of specific space type, and c) are simply short of raw square footage. True to the College's mission, people are working in a cooperative effort for the common good of the College. However, at some point, space need conflicts become overwhelming, and operations become compromised. Integrated Perspective To understand the space utilization issues at Northwestern College, it must be looked at from a total perspective, integrating academic, financial and operational needs. The Mission of Northwestern Col- lege emphasizes the quality of student life. The College's Campus Life Objectives state: Northwestern attempts to provide an environment of wholesome living, aesthetic enjoyment, relationship building, social and cultural NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 3.17 PLANNING ISSUES & ANALYSES III opportunity, and athletic and recreational activity. To enhance student life on campus, numerous activities and opportu- nities are offered to the student. Blocks of time must be available on an organized basis for maximum number of students to participate, i.e., the co -curricular hours of 3 PM — 5PM. Approach Two methods were used to analyze and assess square footage utiliza- tion on Northwestern College's campus. They include: 1. National norms and industry organization standards 2. Comparative use with other colleges Two calculation techniques were used to determine square footage demand. They are based on: 1. Square foot per Weekly Student Contact Hour (WSCH). Factors include contact hours, type and size of space needed per student in each specific type of class, and desired use pattern of space. 2. Square foot per student Full Time Equivalent (FTE). Factors include student population, staff and faculty population, func- tional categories, and minimum "core" for specific functional cat- egories. The "Desired Use Pattern" factors used for analysis on Northwestern College campus adjusted national standards to fit Northwestern's specific operations. Operational assumptions include: 7:30 AM — 3:30 PM school day for traditional programs 3:30 — 5:30 PM for Co -curricular programs ° Chapel uses 30 minutes per day plus travel time (55 minutes total) Qualitative Issues 1 Due to the shortage of classroom and lab space, there is inap- propriate space use for some classes. Also, in FOCUS/ Pathways there is a shortage of space, and "substitute" classroom space is used to meet space demand. 2 Classrooms lag in technological capabilities. Updating with cur- rent day equipment is necessary to be competitive in today's market. However, it may be financially advantageous to not wire laptop classrooms/ labs, and wait 2-3 years until mainstream wire- less technology is available. NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 3.18 PLANNING ISSUES & .ANALYSES E III 3 Faculty Offices are at a premium: A faculty member offices in a'Wenger' Practice Module. Faculty retention is more difficult when faced with this type of space problem. 4 Lecture classes are being held in the Choir and Band Room — students need to use lap boards to take notes. As a result, quality of education suffers. 5 Since Art is a visual discipline, condition of the Art Lab in former Nazareth Gym makes a statement on the quality of the education delivered to Art students (regardless of faculty dedication, etc.). Also, it is not consistent with the College's Mission. 6 Campus Life Objectives (quality of campus life issue) add to square footage demands, often in ways not immediately apparent. 7 Ministry functions support the College's Mission: a Space use must acknowledge ministry functions in some way. b Many of the ministry functions add space demand not found on many campuses c Extent of music (academic program, ministry, outside events, private lessons, etc.) d events (demand for Maranatha Hall use by both academics and outside events) e Radio needs (academic and ministry) f Child Care (academic and ministry) 8 There are many variables in assessing space requirements on college campuses. Each campus has its own personality. For all campuses, the following make an impact on space: Mission Objectives Policies Educational methods, goals Quantitative Issues 100 Classrooms At capacity, even after expanding day by one hour over current day, Classroom space is short by 5,300 Assignable Square Feet. Currently, classroom lectures are being delivered in inappropriate spaces and affecting quality of education. Example: lectures are given in Band and Choir Rooms and require students to take notes on lap boards. 200 Labs At capacity, even after expanding day by one hour over current day, Laboratory space is short by 5,890 Assignable Square Feet. NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 3.19 III Space shortage in Labs is affecting quality of education. Example: Chemistry Lab is typically programmed at 60-80 ASF per student station. At 70 ASF/station, the chemistry lab should be roughly 1,680 ASF (lab and prep). The current lab consists of 931 ASF. Either the lab must be remodeled to be bigger, or additional faculty will be needed. Both Biology and Physics/ Geology Labs have similar constraints.) 300 Offices Allocation per station is significantly larger than standards Quantity of offices in short supply Office location is an issue as to availability for staff versus faculty 400 Library At calculated capacity (Note: 20 year collection growth projected in 1991) 500 Special Use Gymnasium Including Riley Gym, larger than standards for similar size college. Meets various national standards even if Riley Gym converted to classroom Wide variation in standards — size more a matter of institutional policy 600 General Use Assembly Larger than standards for similar size college. Wide variation in standards — size more a matter of institutional policy Size appears necessary to meet college's needs in relation to overall Mission Food Service Food service area calculations indicate a shortage of approximately 1,500 to 2,000 ASF. Kitchen, preparation and serving space are rela- tively adequate, although the serving area can be tight at times. The Dining Area is short approximately 1,000 to 1,500 ASF, and is evident by observation of daily crowding between 11:00 AM and 12:00 PM. Adding to the crowding problem in the Dining area is that Chapel releases just prior to lunch time. Depending on College desires, poli- cies and operations, scheduling of Chapel at a time not so close to the lunch hour would likely relieve some crowding in the Dining area. This would provide more time to spread out lunch time for diners, thus reducing peak loads and the need for more space. Bookstore Currently, the Bookstore has 1,260 ASF, and for a college of 1,500 FTE, a bookstore operation would be expected to occupy 1,800 – 2,400 ASF. NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 3.20 PLANNING > ISSUES & ANALYSES E III Lounges Student Lounge space totals 12,085 on campus proper. (This total includes Main Dorm Lounges at 10,257 ASF, but excludes off -campus dorms). This equates to 4.5 percent. Although adequate total square footage of lounge space is provided, it would be desirable to have a higher percentage of the total Lounge space distributed in academic buildings on main campus rather than the largest amount of it in Main Dorm. 700 Support Space Within standards Evening Hours FOCUS/ Pathways and Personal Enrichment There is a distinct shortage of classrooms in the evening hours. (Lab space is not a problem.) The Fall 2001 schedule calls for 33 FOCUS/ Pathways classes to begin at one time, when there are only 27 true classrooms on campus. If a Masters program is started, space issue is further aggravated. Hours of Operation School day is currently 8 AM — 3 PM. Study was performed on 7:30 AM — 3:30 PM basis. Even with additional hour included in calculations, campus is still tight for instructional space. If school day were pushed further into the afternoon, several issues become more prevalent: • Less down time for classroom setups and re -arranging for instruc- tor needs • Time slots for cleaning and maintenance are becoming shorter and shorter (evening class hours, Saturday classes, summer dorm occupancy, etc.) • Overtime wages for support personnel at odd hours • Ability to "sell" credit hours at less suitable hours in the day (student life, student study time, student jobs, faculty availability, etc.) Classroom Sizes Need for 12-15 station size classroom is evident in many academic programs. Space Use Recommendations 1 Continue to refine the College's Space Inventory so that a) on- going space inventory is accurate, b) comparisons with standards and similar institutions reflect parallel data, and c) resulting assessments are meaningful. NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 3.21 PLANNING ISSUES & ANALYSES E III 2 Update space demand on a regular basis in parallel with academic curriculum and programming. Assess true needs quantitatively, but with consideration for Northwestern College's specific educa- tional delivery methods, mission, goals and objectives, etc. 3 Continue investigation of space use at higher education institu- tions with compara'ole mission and goals. 4 Establish an on-going, formal process to deal with future space needs and space requests. (Perhaps appoint a standing space evaluation committee.) Also, develop a policy for evaluating space requests, generally in the priority order listed below: a. evaluate space needs based on standards b. achieve higher utilization of existing space (currently achieved) c. relocate functions (better flow, more appropriate room size, etc.) d. re -allocate existing space(s) e. renovate existing spaces for more effective function f. remodel existing spaces g. expand existing building with new construction 5 Develop a space use model that incorporates standards for station sizes, use expectancy, furniture standards, scheduling priorities, etc. 6 Continue to recognize Northwestern College's unique Mission as it affects facilities needs and use. All decisions must be "tested" against the Mission. 7 Develop integrated Institutional Master Plan that correlates aca- demic and financial needs and capabilities with facilities issues. All three entities are ideally in balance, so that all entities support and enhance one another. Major reviews and reports devoted to implementation should occur yearly, and quarterly meetings devoted to examine the goals and objectives, and monitor action plans, are recommended to be held. Planning Although the College is experiencing some significant space issues, it is important that the College not react in a hasty fashion to solve problems for the short-term future. Too often, this can paint an organization into a corner that will be felt for decades and decades. It must be stressed that the College look at all issues in context of the College's Mission and long range institutional plan. NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 3.22 PLANNINGISSUES & ANALYSES 0 I11 Campus Technologies Issues 1. Adequate size and location of wiring closets in all campus build- ings. Need for standards. 2. Lack of standards for cable distribution above ceilings and risers between floors. 3. What should classroom standards for technology include? (hard wired, wireless, overhead projection, media console, instructor podium, etc.) 4. Need for additional space for increasing staff, support operations and personnel mergers between departments. (Lower Level Riley remodeling of existing Women's Locker Rooms will alleviate cur- rent needs, but not future / growth needs.) 5. Need quiet space for technology personnel to upgrade technology skills. (2-3 stations?) 6. Increased demand for computer labs (coordinate demand with indi- vidual departments) 7. As computers become more applied in educational delivery, demand for "Technology Zone' (faculty technology assistance) increases. 8. Need a technology training room for faculty/ staff. 9. Storage space is short in many areas, especially with new PC rota- tion program. 10. Telecomm, Help Desk Campus Technologies are adequately housed, now and after Lower Level Riley remodeling. 11. Students are coming to campus with more technology skills and needs every year. 12. Major growth will be in alternative education areas. 13. What will impact of proposed graduate programs be? (similar to Capella University model?) 14. Separate organizations and effort are required due to separate portal, internet intranet and Radio internet entities. 15. IS will still need space after Riley remodeling. Also, IS needs space for quiet technology team space for computer-based training, tech- nology piloting and testing, certification work. 16. IT does not see a need for additional space due to consolidation strategy for servers, data storage and networking. The strategy will allow scalability to permit growth in support and number of people being served. Code Issues Northwestern College has done an excellent job of maintaining its facil- ities. At the same time, there are numerous code deficiencies. Of par- ticular note is that are existing corridors that should have the code required 1 -hour fire protection. Common air return in corridors (doors, air transfer, HVAC balance) is an especially acute problem. 0 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 3.23 III Site Constraints upper L &e yl -PLM KEY $ 17 Fwe"Iq S -k L I E 1-11RYTl.alncI2 I kG I I am, R�d I 9 r'X i 7 # NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 3.24 L I' � 'tit • ''. �t - I. : $ 9• � � � � I- � I I I �! r - I LLL- rlum NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 3.24 PLANNING ISSUES & ANALYSES E III S�j Oop C�> • 36D� oQD 6,GsFi� 4-00/ DDO tAkv �$ I Preliminary Concept Synthesis WRIVINA= RECREATION� NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 3.25 Concept As a result of discussions and input during the Issues Identification Pro- cess, a preliminary con- j cept was synthesized by 2hF��uw�wi Pv Planners. The concept 34�.�0o sr Zi��ts was reviewed and dis- cussed with Master Plan- i ning Committee members J;�/°Lq sF ley on various occassions. Crn The concept plan was out- "9 endorsed by the Commit- by Y tee and was the basis for further planning develop- fG ment. 50,+OP _ S�j Oop C�> • 36D� oQD 6,GsFi� 4-00/ DDO tAkv �$ I Preliminary Concept Synthesis WRIVINA= RECREATION� NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 3.25 IV MISSION, OBJECTIVES, ACCREDITATION & AFFFILIATIONS Mission Northwestern College exists to provide Christ -centered higher educa- tion equipping believers to grow intellectually and spiritually, to serve effectively in their professions, and to give God -honoring leadership in the home, church, community, and world. Objectives Northwestern upholds its heritage of biblical distinctives through the vital integration of human knowledge and Divine revelation. The goal of the College is to help develop the whole person, characterized by personal development, spiritual maturity, ethical conviction, intellec- tual curiosity, cultural sensitivity, professional achievement, and faith- ful service to society and the world Spiritual and Ethical Objectives Northwestern provides a relevant alternative to secular education with- out Christian values. Northwestern is a community in which all learn- ing is framed within the Christian worldview found in the Bible. Northwestern promotes a growing love, knowledge, and worship of God seeking to instruct students in those truths Jesus commanded all to observe. Under God's grace and the moral teachings of His word, stu- dents are encouraged to live with humility, honesty, joy, integrity, self- control, and service. Students are encouraged to discern God's truth about the moral issues of our day and realize their fullest potential as Christian witnesses. Northwestern seeks to prepare students to relate their faith to all areas of life, including their academic and professional activities; to think critically from a Christian viewpoint; and to evaluate based upon the Scriptures all human theories and discoveries. Academic Objectives Northwestern is a Christian Liberal Arts College of the Bible, Arts and Sciences, and Professional Education. Northwestern is committed to the integration of faith, learning, and living as it seeks to develop the whole person — the complete Christian. Biblical Studies: Northwestern puts Christ and His Word at the center of all activities. The Scriptures are the integrating core for all programs. The biblical studies component is designed to provide a foundation for life and leads students to develop a Christian worldview. Students in traditional academic programs generally register for four credits per NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 4.1 COLLEGE MISSION, OBJECTIVES & AFFILIATIONS K IV semester in biblical studies. Students enrolled in a 4 -year degree pro- gram earn a minimum of 30 credits (the equivalent of a second major). Nontraditional, degree -completion students also take a proportionate number of classes in biblical studies. General Education: The general education curriculum at Northwestern College is designed to enhance students' understanding of God and His creation. To this end the curriculum encourages students to be grounded in all aspects of life based on the Scriptures within a variety of disciplines. General education exposes students to knowledge of Western and non -Western culture, literature, the fine arts, knowledge of fundamental scientific and mathematical principles, and the knowl- edge of human growth and development within a social context. The teaching of general education is designed to develop the student's abil- ity to think critically, to reason analytically, to solve problems, and to communicate effectively in speaking and writing. It supports the gen- eral goal of the College to prepare students intellectually, emotionally, physically, spiritually, and socially for life in the church and society, and to be of service to God and others. Majors and Professional Preparation: Northwestern is dedicated to assist- ing students in their development of marketable skills in selected areas, particularly in businesses or professions equally useful in either sacred or secular enterprises. Northwestern uses the term "vocation" in its literal meaning (i.e., God's calling), believing that it is the Christian's responsibility to serve God's purpose in every aspect of life. Campus Life Objectives Northwestern seeks to provide a God -honoring environment that includes wholesome living, aesthetic enjoyment, relationship building, social and cultural opportunity, and athletic and recreational activity. Accreditations +Affiliation Northwestern College is... accredited by the Commission on Institutions of Higher Education of the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools. ... incorporated under the laws of the state of Minnesota as a College of the Bible, Arts and Sciences, and Professional Education. ... is registered with the Minnesota Higher Education Services Office (MHESO). NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 4.2 COLLEGE MISSION, =OBJECTIVES & AFFILIATIONS IV ... approved by the Minnesota Board of Teaching to offer program lead- ing to teacher licensure. ... approved for the training of students under government educational programs for veterans and war orphans, including Public Law 634 (War Orphans Educational Assistance Act) and Public Law 89-358 (Veterans Readjustment Benefits Act). ... an accredited institutional member of the National Association of Schools of Music. .. a member of the Council for Christian Colleges & Universities. ... a member of the Council of Independent Colleges. ... a member of the National Association of Christian College Admis- sions Personnel and endorses the NACCAP principles of good prac- tice. ... a charter member of the Evangelical Council for Financial Account- ability. ... an Associated School of Jerusalem University College (formerly the Institute of Holy Land Studies). ... a member of the Evangelical Training Association. ... a charter member of the Association of Christian Schools Interna- tional. NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 4.3 Recommendations are based on assumption that College will increase to 2,400 average FTE RECOMMENDATIONS E V GENERAL Test every decision against the college's Mission and strategic plan, no matter if the issue seems insignificant or not. Does it support the Mission? 2 Formally adopt the Campus Master Plan as part of the Col- lege's Long Range Strategic Plan. 3 Gently guide and nurture the culture change within the Facilities lization institution that will institutional Development Plan occur by increasing enrollment from 1600 to 2400 FTE. The Circulation Land Use change will occur more smoothly and quickly if students staff, faculty, adminis- tration and trustees are all supported in Facilities Plan this significant commitment. An open and positive mind set is the foundation for success. "There is no more delicate matter to take in hand, nor more dangerous to conduct, nor more doubtful of success, than to step up as a leader in the introduction of change. For he who innovates will have for his enemies all those who are well off under the existing order of things, and only lukewarm support in those who might be better off under the new.' —Machiavelli 4 College will need to somewhat increase the density of its land use on campus. At the same time, extreme care needs to be taken to maintain the pastoral character of the campus. 5 Implementing the Campus Master Plan will require working with city entities to determine acceptable levels of development, zoning restrictions, utility planning, neighborhood meetings, etc. On a specific level, the College needs should work with the City(s) to consider the appropriate method of zoning control (designated institutional zoning district, PUD, etc.) To help advance this effort, the College needs to maximize positive pub- licity regarding its efforts in the community. (buckthorn eradi- cation, student programs assisting local communities, faculty involvement in community, musical productions, etc.) 6 All estimated costs in the Campus Master Plan are in November 2003 dollars. To account for inflation between November 2003 and when a project actually begins construction, all costs should be escalated to the projected mid -point of construction for each respective project. NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 5.1 I' v 7 Regularly and continually, as opportunities afford, make the case to all community constituencies the reasons why continued, managed growth is essential. I.e., philosophically "we should not limit God's sovereignty for NWC's mission"; and fiscally, _ "NWC needs the additional revenue in order to accomplish its strategic goals." POLICY 8 To maintain long term integrity of the campus, permanent stand- ing committees should be established for the following purposes: a Space Evaluation Committee: monitor and assess cam- pus -wide space needs, and respond to departmental space requests. b Historical Preservation Committee: ensure aesthetic preserva- tion of campus architecture and artifacts, while at the same time, balancing the true costs with preservation. c Committees shall consist of a broad constituency to assure that the overall interests of the college are assured. 9 While the Master Plan provides a large scale, long-term frame- work, additional detailed studies need to be performed to fully implement the plan. Sub -studies include: a Preliminary storm water engineering study (will involve Rice Creek Watershed) b Preliminary utilities engineering study (capacities, locations, etc.) c Soil borings to determine soil types and capacity d Detailed campus Master Landscape Plan (develop working relationship with a landscape architect) e Engineering report to consider the impact of decentralization versus a central physical plant. f Detailed planning studies (with appropriate consultants and affected staff) to 7,4' and build 'specialized' spaces �{ � 0 'l�f suppo t�MasteCampusandards should be estab- lished for the following items: a Wayfinding system (site and building internal) b Landscape materials (paving, plant materials, lighting, etc.) (per Landscape Architect) c Furnishings (especially generic classrooms and computer labs where student capacity can be greatly affected by type and sizes of chairs and tables) NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 5.2 RECOMMENDATIONS E V d Building finishes (cleanability, consistency, durability, aesthet- ics, expression of college image, etc.) e Communication systems (data, telecomm, TV, radio, CCTV, etc.) infrastructure standards (wiring closets, cable trays, wiring, podiums, control panels, AV equipment, etc.) Also, large capacity conduit (inter -duct) should be considered between buildings. f Adequate square footage and equipment be allocated for cus- todial and maintenance functions. g Generic classrooms and "Technology" classrooms (finishes, furnishings, lighting, controls, instructor podiums, electronic equipment, etc.) h Space use (square footage per station in classrooms, labs and offices) i All remodeling, additions and additions shall consider USGBC (United States Green Building Council) and LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) provisions for design and construction methods. Each individual project shall be reviewed from a cost/benefit analysis perspective. This approach also will serve as support for the college's edu- cational programs, as well as instilling an attitude for respon- sible resource use in its students, staff and faculty. j All remodeling and additions shall meet or exceed standards required by: Minnesota State Building Code, DNR, OSHA, ASHRAE, AHERA, and the American with Disabilities Act. 11 Develop a set of 'Design Guidelines in which new buildings, additions and remodelings will use a consistent palette of materi- als, colors and forms (internal as well as external). Building height and massing should also be a major consideration in the design vocabulary and campus fabric. Keep in mind that the college's image is a powerful marketing tool. Materials used can affect many aspects: maintenance costs, initial cost versus "life cycle" cost, consistency with architecture on campus, safety, etc. 12 Consider developing a system of "allocating costs" (heating, cooling, electrical, telecomm, maintenance, repairs, equipment, etc.) for space use in respective departments and user groups that will reflect true departmental facility operational costs. (Keep in mind that the cost structure needs to be balanced against the college's mission, culture and "whole" student.) 13 Building Space Utilization: To help mitigate the shortage of classroom and lab space, cen- tralized space management. (academics, performances, athletics, support functions, etc) will help maximize existing space. NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 5.3 Depending on funding models, teaching methods and faculty efficiency, enroll the optimum number of students in a class. Such efforts will require a genuine commitment on the part of faculty and administration. For this to happen the College should consider the following steps: a Review and assess space utilization in the format of the National Center for Education Statistics manual, Postsecond- ary Education Facilities Inventory & Classification Manual (FICM). This allows accurate comparisons with other institu- tions. b Adopt policies for and designate shared facilities for general use (like classrooms), rather than allow departmental "owner- ship" of such rooms. c Schedule spaces up to their full potential for each week. Scheduling of all spaces should be done by a designated col- lege administrator with the input of faculty. Consideration of "generic student station", or double -use of student stations in some labs may be appropriate. Measure such scheduling in weekly use hours (WRH) and monitor achievement of sched- uling each school year. d Consider alternatives to the standard MWF / TTh class sched- uling sequence. 14 Policy for Providing Building Space: It is recommended that the College establish an on-going formal process to deal with future space needs and space requests. In an atmosphere of tight financial resources it is prudent to insure that careful evaluation of space needs precedes planning for expansion. Once program needs are established, the method of providing space to accommodate program needs is recom- mended to be followed in the priority order listed below: a achieve highest utilization of existing space, b renovate and reallocate existing space(s) c expand existing building by new construction 15 The College has a significant need for small, informal student study spaces. The need for such spaces will only increase as the number of students increases. It is recommended that spaces be provided for students to study and to expand the opportunities for social contacts with others. Depending on the specific need and requirements, the study areas could be separate rooms, or could be integrated with the corridor system. Develop a policy for inclusion of study lounge spaces in all new and remodeled spaces (academic and housing). New buildings would dedicate 2-57o of the assignable square footage (ASF) for NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 5.4 Y study space. As part of the policy, the study space should not be cut from a project to alleviate budget issues. (proportional reduction) 16 The college should develop a policy for "land banking' property and acquiring/ renting facilities (interim use as 'stop gap' or long term). The college needs to proactively monitor and pursue desirable and potentially available property and facilities. As property or facilities become available, the college should be pre- pared to acquire desirable land and facilities in accordance with an established priority and availability of financial resources, including the use of strategic partnerships and alliances. 17 Strongly support Alternative Education, as this is a potential area of significant growth and income. 18 Periodic Review and Monitoring Implementation of Campus Master Plan: Successful operation of an organization is always based on plan- ning. Planning can be effective only if it is implemented. Imple- mentation requires an organized effort, which sets the action steps required to put the plan's recommendations into practice... into motion. It also reviews the Master Plan in context and moni- tors the achievements and accomplishments of the goals identi- fied during the planning process. Among the effective working tools of plan implementation are: a. Setting up specific dates to meet and review b. Designating accountable supervisors c. Reporting progress on the progress of implementation d. These supervisors (leading officers of the institution), should develop detailed plans and strategies to achieve each goal/ objective and each recommendation. e. Major reviews and reports devoted to implementation should occur yearly. Quarterly meetings are recommended to exam- ine the goals and objectives, and monitor action plans. f. Information packets on the plan upgrades should be distrib- uted to inform the NWC'community'. IMAGE 19 Develop a Campus Entrance Plan as part of the new develop- ment, and enhance the feeling of arrival for the visitor, through both exterior and interior treatment of spaces. Such Entrance NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 5.5 Plan should consider pedestrian entrance areas as well as service and vehicular arrival areas 20 Develop a Site Improvement and Landscaping Plan for the entire campus in coordination with the development recommendations of the Campus Master Plan. Special attention should be given to such areas as: 21 pedestrian walkways entry areas interior courts parking areas lake orientation student safety The college should make definitive efforts to maintain consistency in building mate- rials (brick and stone) and their use. The Historical Preservation Committee should be used to ensure historical and aesthetic preservation of campus architecture, as the buildings are an expression of who Northwestern College is. It should be remem- bered that the College's image (physical and psychological) is a powerful marketing tool. (Refer to 'Design Guidelines') 22 Until anew student/ community center can be built, develop Nazareth Hall's east entry so that it gives prospective students a feeling of welcome and importance. 23 As part of educating the whole student, maximize display of stu- dent work throughout campus at appropriate locations. Display- ing artwork on campus in a serious and professional manner will reflect the College's investment in its current students, and also serve as a marketing function with prospective students. 24 Establish forum for informal, low key solo and ensemble "con- certs" (with no electronic needs) at various locations on campus. 25 Look at ways to capitalize on the campus island and chapel. Appropriate uses could be a nature resource and a spiritual retreat. Other uses could be a student -gathering place and a tool to increase funding from outside sources such as weddings and baptisms. An amphitheater could be developed for plays and concerts to be viewed from the shore or on boats off shore. With the quality of the college's music program, these concerts would be a good public gesture and reinforce the college's standing as a good neighbor. NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 5.6 FACILITIES 26 Maintain an 'Institutional' level of quality for building materials. (cavity wall construction, window construction meeting air infil- tration standards, built-up roof standards, exterior ductwork insulation, indoor air quality, etc.) Refer to 'Design Guidelines'. 27 Monitor and continue to refine implementation process for the College's 10 year Deferred Maintenance Plan. This includes building code and ADA issues. 28 Code Compliance: Upgrade code deficiencies as part of the Col- lege's 10 year Deferred Maintenance Plan. Particularly egregious are existing corridors that should have the code required 1 -hour fire protection. Common air return in corridors (doors, air trans- fer, HVAC balance) is an especially acute 'Life Safety' problem. 29 To maximize capital campaign fund "donor dollars" (i.e., naming opportunities), group as many Capital Improvement Plan tasks with proposed new buildings. (Note that NWC Facili- ties Modernization is 367o of the required Capital Improvement Plan.) 30 Safety/Health/Statutory is about 107o of the Capital Improve- ment Plan, and even small renovations will require meeting statutory requirements which have associated costs (ex. asbestos abatement, sprinkler systems, rated corridors, air exchanges, etc.). 31 Make every effort to stay in line with phasing for the Capital Improvement Plan priorities and schedule. Deference only exac- erbates the problems by making existing problems worse and results in higher costs. 32 Incorporate vertical and horizontal wiring paths (wiring closets, chases, cable trays, etc.) in all remodelings, additions and new buildings. Also, large capacity conduit (inter -duct) should be considered between buildings. 33 Maximize flexibility of lecture spaces and meeting rooms through the use of high quality, movable acoustic walls with appropriate STC (sound transmission coefficient) ratings. 34 Flexibility of Spaces: When constructing new building spaces, they should be flexible in serving the educational endeavor to the maximum extent. NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 5.7 RECOMMENDATIONS Flexibility allows for dealing with unforeseen program develop- ments at a reduced cost and has the potential of facilitating scheduling. Owing to flexibility, spaces can also serve other groups, and therefore, increase the efficient use of facilities. Moreover, the techniques of presenting course material in class have been changing. Innovations, whose aims are ranging from the more thorough conveyance of material to the saving of teach- ing staff hours, are almost constantly being introduced. Ignoring these changes would contradict the very essence of good college building, i.e., to facilitate the teaching functions. Here, flexibility intends to mean expandability of spaces and convertibility of spaces. This flexibility may manifest itself in a grid -like (modular) arrangement of structure, mechanical, electri- cal and signal supply lines, so that each module may serve func- tions at a certain, predictable level. These services can be tapped by the educational program at a functional and convenient spot. They could be present, hidden in the floor, or in the ceiling space, etc. If it were too expensive to build them, the main supply lines may provide a stub, or be only "roughed in" to be used later. Other practical manifesta- tions of flexibility are: constructing larger, sub -dividable spaces, or generic science labs to serve several subjects. 35 Develop a campus "Central Store" (likely location is in new Student/ Community Center Building) which allows bulk pur- chasing that is cost effective, and maintains better inventory and control. Provide 'legitimate' loading dock for semi loading and step van loading. 36 As a short term solution to space needs, consider "decking" Riley Hall Gym with a second level, and relocating appropriate campus functions for greater effectiveness in serving the student population. 37 As part of educating the whole student, consider incorporating a "fitness room" in new campus housing. 38 The need to use a space or building for a time as short term storage or staging area for a larger project must be understood by the NWC community. A building my not be used at first for its intended or advertised use. (The proposed Community Life Building and Alternative Education Program would be exam- ples.) 39 Relocation of above ground and below grade services should be assessed for cost and planned for relocation to minimize ease- ments and maintenance cost. NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 5.8 40 Information on all proposed facility proposals shall be distrib- uted to the NWC'community' for review and input. OPERATIONS, ETC. 41 As part of recruiting students, applying for grant requests and soliciting funds for its capital campaign, the college should con- tinue to capitalize on the uniqueness of its strengths. (music ministries, ancient literature, campus setting and architecture, ...) 42 In order to "bridge the facilities gap" between 1600 FTE and 2400 FTE, the admissions process must be monitored closely and managed in parallel with future building construction. 43 Investigate and acquire software that allows campus wide scheduling and facility utilization to become more centralized, integrating academic and event scheduling. (academics, extra- curricular, performances, visitors, weddings, special events, etc.) 44 To maximize efficient use of space, departmental "ownership" of classrooms and general labs should not be permitted. 45 To alleviate immediate space needs, incorporate one or two addi- tional hours per day to the schedule. Review issue of "protected" hours. 46 To provide more flexibility of operations and minimize the need for new space, large group functions can be broken down into smaller groups. (Chapel, dining, concerts, etc.) Culture of the College needs to be included in the discussions of making these changes. 47 As part of on-going space management, continue to monitor square footage use and compare against norms. (Space use man- agement would be improved when the College implements a "cost allocation" system to encourage departmental efficiencies, as well as accountability.) 48 Consider designating parking zones that reflect frequency of use and need. Control parking with the use of vehicle stickers. 49 Purchase Sutton Field for use as overflow practice field. (Note that officials of Presbyterian Homes potentially have plans to build on the Sutton Field area in 7 years.) 50 Expand student broadcasting and television to closed-circuit campus programming. NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 5.9 RECOMMENDATIONS 51 Provide a mid-size auditorium/ theatre in the music wing addi- tion seating 500± persons. This would be a more efficient loca- tion for 'black box' theatre, chapel "overflow", smaller concerts, chapel alternatives, theatre productions, conferences, etc. than using Maranatha auditorium (1500) or Nazareth Chapel (300). This space could also be considered for rental use to produce outside income. 52 Research ways to reduce overhead costs by reduction of waste, more efficient use of present resources, student involvement in the preservation of physical assets, and energy conservation mea- sures (heat recovery, ground source heating and cooling, occu- pancy sensors for lighting, etc.). All remodeling, additions and additions shall consider USGBC (United States Green Building Council) and LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) provisions for design and construction methods. Each individual project shall be reviewed from a cost/ benefit analysis perspective. MISCELLANEOUS 53 In the College's 10 year Deferred Maintenance Plan, NWC was compared to about 18 other schools. As an aid to continual improvement by NWC, it would be beneficial to evaluate NWC's strengths and weaknesses in comparison with the other schools referenced. 54 Research and assess availability of grants, and discuss potential approaches with assets and sister colleges. 55 Do a performance analysis in each of the college's departments and streamline service. 56 Evaluate all services that the College produces and purchases, compare them against the industry norms and standards (cost, quality, life expectancy, etc), and make adjustments to improve the College's position. IMPLEMENTATION 57 As the College seriously develops its plans for expanding to 2400 traditional student FTE, the time frame must be developed in concert with, and in parallel with, the Capital Campaign for new space. NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 5.10 58 Prepare formal marketing materials for Capital Campaign (plan- ning drawings, preliminary building design, renderings, etc.) efforts. Planning Consultant should work with College's market- ing department in preparation of such materials. 59 When budgeting for construction projects, typical "soft costs" range from 25-307o of total Project Cost. (Construction Cost 757o + Soft Costs 25% = Project Cost 100%) Also, added maintenance costs and faculty/ staff costs for the new facilities need to be accounted for during planning stages. In addition, inflation costs need to be projected (and included in project budget) for year that project is built. 60 Develop a high level financial model covering the next fifteen year period that reflects: a) the building and operational costs for the new facilities specified in the Campus Master Plan, b) the additional student tuition and fee revenue associated with the projected student FTE growth, and c) the additional faculty, staff, and operating costs attendant with this growth. NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 5.11 IMPLEMENTATIONVI i IMPLEMENTATION DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK PHASING COST PROJECTIONS COSTS i IMPLEMENTATION 0 VI IMPLEMENTATION The Potential Built Form The Campus Plan shows the potential built form of the campus as major goals are accomplished. The Plan combines land use, circulation and physical form aspects of campus development. The Plan is influenced by the Mission, current campus operation, governance /management and by implementation of the recommen- dations described earlier in the Plan. Development Framework The 'Development Framework' sets general direction and permits mid -course adjustments as conditions change. It was developed through a participatory planning process representing all interests on campus. Through a series of extensive interviews and meetings, unanimous consensus was developed by the Campus Master Plan - ring Committee. Refer to the 'Campus Master Plan Scope' drawing on the following page. Timeframe The planning process generally looked at campus development over 3 basic time periods: 5-10 years 10-25 years 25-75 years (long term) Cost Projections A cost projection was prepared for use in planning a Capital Cam- paign. This cost projection looks at the next 20-30 years for comple- tion of elements illustrated on the following Campus Master Plan Scope drawing. NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 6.1 Note: A larger 11 x 17 version of this plan is inserted at the end of the Master Plan. VI Development Framework Pedestrian New Dormitory 2990 Snelling Infill %'Beds / 3 Levels LL Parking Campus Master Plan Scope j, 51 Beds Dormitory. I �� aooeas j6 Dormitory 2906 5nel fins s NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 6.2 i a PROPOSED :'` EXISTING Island Chapel and _ Natr re Resource Art$uilding& Sculpture Terrace Remodel Powerhouse \ •, Demolish Sheds _ t 11,600 SF C M Nazareth I -fall f 12th. 75 0 GSF Music Addition (Ari) r \ > 24 000 GSF / 3 Levels TotinoFine Arts Center ParkingULIZa Stalls �• ti f •" \ 63,713 GSF MaintenaneeLL BemstenResourceCenter Community Life Center/ � +� 23,833 GSF General Purpose/ \ , Classrooms 8Q 000 SF 13 Levels = -_ _ I Library Addition / - i Riley F[a11 12000 CSF / 3 Levels f y / 99,695 GSF oeckGymadd 11,900ASF Academic General / Science - - 48, 000 GSF 13 Levels /r Parkin 2le;els /f/ - fmgadc+rstrudwcdtwd) // - Exis'{in Tennis Cau r6 990= Stalls New Dormitory-- ao0'Beds f 3Levels �- _ h1ar}' er i7ormi tory 88 B eds _- - Ericksen Center 35, 859 GSA -O-f,.'� _ Knutson / 1-lariill _ _ - 680 Beds ----1 ; New Fieldhouse 160• x 300' 9 Courts / Indoor track _ Laker Room CNfices Concessions Athletic Fields Recon figured f South Terrace Dorm `t 73 Beds Visitor/ Alumni Center ---- - - _ rf kT]S Radio SF the `r�*•. itnlbhnson Media Center _ 42,665 SF DemolishFxstgDorm(73) Future Building/ Addition to KrIS _ I' ? 1 Pedestrian New Dormitory 2990 Snelling Infill %'Beds / 3 Levels LL Parking Campus Master Plan Scope j, 51 Beds Dormitory. I �� aooeas j6 Dormitory 2906 5nel fins s NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 6.2 IMPLEMENTATION -W VI Phasing The table below outlines a potential phasing sequence. Obviously, the Development Framework allows flexibility in development, so as facilities are built, adjustments must be made to inter -dependent sequences. As well, phasing scenarios may be adjusted due to Chang- ing priorities, funding availability, etc. The column titled 'Occupancy Sequence" lists whether various phases are occupant/ operationally dependent or not. I.e., each phase must consider whether existing operations will be impacted during and after construction. a c a m a- Z 0 � U � m� Q Units Q_ o o added Space(s) Comments 1 1 11,900 Riley Hall Gym Decking/remodeling add 11,900 sfAcademic space 2 1 330 Poential purchase 330 beds (not part of Capital Campaign) 3a D 125 Maranatha Ramp UL for Maranatha event use 3b D 12,000 New LL Maint Faciliites 3c D — Reconfigure NW Storm Pond 4a D — Realign road behind Riley Hall 4b Reconfigure Nazareth south and east parking 4c Build Student Life Building includies food service 4d Add Storm Pond 5a I Construct `Mall' 5b D MusicAddition 5c D Remodel exstg main level music area(east) Art + general classrooms 6a Phase 1 parking (exstg tennis) construct ijn two halves 6b D 60,375 Remodel Phase 1 Nazareth assumes one half of total = 60,375 (remove kitchen) 7 D 60,375 Remodel Phase 2 Nazareth assumes one half of total = 60,375 8 Poential purchase 330 beds (not part of Capital Campaign) 9a Athletic associated fields 9b D Fieldhouse and 10 D 11,600± Powerhouse Remodel 12a 1 12,000 Library Addition 12b 225 Phase 2 Parking (exstg tennis) second half 13 1 15,700 Remodel South Terrace into Offices Alt Ed, admin, etc. 14 New Dormitory Apt 2940 Snelling Infill 15a I Re -align road for new academic bldg 15b 1 48,000 Science / General Academic Bldg 16 1 tbd Build Visitor's / Alumni Center — I Sculpture Terrace Undetermined — D — tbd per mech/elec study Central vs Decentraolized Physical Plant NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 6.3 Note: These cost projections need to be updated bi- annually to reflect current true costs (inflation). Buildings Buildings/Area unit Const Cost Cost Projections soft Total Project Cost Costs Nov 2003 Dollars Community Life Center/General Function/Classroom (Phase 1) (phsng 10% prem) 45,000 GSF 6,750,000 1,687,500 8,437,500 Community Life Center/General Functions/Classrooms (Phase 2) 35,000 GSF 5,250,000 1,312,500 6,562,500 Music Addition 20,000 GSF 3,200,000 800,000 4,000,000 Existing Music area(east) remodeling (Art and ?) 6,000 GSF 360,000 90,000 450,000 General Academic/Science Building (half science, half academic) 48,000 GSF 8,400,000 2,100,000 10,500,000 Greenhouse (integral to bldg) 500 GSF 125,000 31,250 156,250 Nazareth Remodel Phase 1 (Phasing adds 30%) 60,000 GSF 5,100,000 1,275,000 6,375,000 Nazareth Remodel Phase 2 (Phasing adds 30%) 60,000 GSF 5,100,000 1,275,000 6,375,000 Renovate Powerhouse (academic + admin) 11,600 GSF(±) 1,160,000 290,000 1,450,000 Sculpture I Music Terrace - tbd tbd tbd tbd LibraryAddition 12,000 GSF 1,980,000 495,000 2,475,000 Alumni Center 10,000 GSF (tbd) 1,550,000 387,500 1,937,500 New Classroom/Office Building 30,000 GSF 4,200,000 1,050,000 5,250,000 (demolish South Terrace Dorm) 200 Allowance per seat 60,000 9,000 69,000 Fieldhouse (6 lane track, 4 tennis courts, ........) 51,200 GSF 6,144,000 1,536,000 7,680,000 Ancillary Space (Offices, lockers, toilets, etc.) 8,000 GSF (tbd) 1,200,000 300,000 1,500,000 Concessionary 750 GSF 131,250 32,813 164,063 New Dormitory East- Phase 1 (adjacent to Knutson) 275 Beds ± 8,662,500 2,165,625 10,828,125 New Dormitory East- Phase 2(adjacent to Knutson) 275 Beds ± 8,662,500 2,165,625 10,828,125 New Dormitory Apt 2940 Snelling Infill 95 Beds ± 3,087,500 771,875 3,859,375 Underground parking 35 Stalls ± 630,000 157,500 787,500 Potential Purchase of Existing Apt Bldg(s) for Dorms unknown Beds tbd tbd tbd Renovation Cost for Converting Apts unknown Beds tbd tbd tbd Parking Facility East (exstg tennis) (1 level slab -on -grade) 250 Stalls ± 1,125,000 281,250 1,406,250 1 Structured level 250 Stalls ± 3,500,000 875,000 4,375,000 Parking Facility NW (UL for Maranatha event use) 125 Stalls ± 2,000,000 500,000 2,500,000 Lower Level Maintenance Operations (LL) 12,000 GSF (verify) 1,440,000 360,000 1,800,000 Physical plant functions tbd per Eng Study tbd tbd tbd (central or per bldg?) (current central plant includes Maranatha, Nazareth and Riley) Subtotal Building Costs 79,757,750 19,939,438 99,697,188 Sitework Note: Sitework scope/cost projections to be verified w/ conceptual engineering design unit Const Cost soft costs* Total Project cost in Nov 2003 Dollars Construct'Mall' 160,000 SFAllowance 560,000 140,000 700,000 Blue Room/President's Reception Courtyard 14,000 SFAllowance 84,000 21,000 105,000 (relocate KTIS satellites) Re-route road behind Riley Hall 1,400 LF 259,000 38,850 297,850 Re-route road west of NewAcad/Science Bldg 400 LF 74,000 11,100 85,100 Re-route road at athletic fields/entry 100 LF 18,500 2,775 21,275 Community Life parking reconfiguration (north) 150 Stalls ± (Allowance) 225,000 33,750 258,750 Community Life parking reconfiguration (south) 100 Stalls ± (Allowance) 150,000 22,500 172,500 Relocate Athletic Fields Football/Soccer (turf) Baseball (turf, dirt sliding pits + mound) All athletic fields Lump Sum 1,600,000 240,000 1,840,000 Softball (dirt infield, turf outfield) Field lighting 175;000 26,250 201,250 Permanent bleachers, Press box 2,000 Allowance per seat 800,000 120,000 920,000 Re -use exstg bleachers for baseball (?) 200 Allowance per seat 60,000 9,000 69,000 Dug outs, fencing, goal posts, etc 1 Allowance Tunnel re-configuration/re-location 1 Allowance 250,000 37,500 287,500 Tunnel extensiuon from Riley to New Parking facility 300 11fAllowance 450,000 67,500 517,500 Data line re -location 1 Allowance 250,000 37,500 287,500 Utility Work (new, re -location, re -sizing) (water, sewer, elec) 1 Allowance 1,000,000 150,000 1,150,000 Add storm water storage pond(s) (incl piping, etc.) 1 Allowance 650,000 97,500 747,500 Re -size, re -locate storm storage ponds 1 Allowance 300,000 45,000 345,000 Implement Master Landscape Plan tbd tbd tbd tbd (plant materials, surfaces, walks, lighting, site furnishings, signage, etc.) Subtotal Sitework Costs 6,905,500 1,100,255 8,005,725 GRAND TOTAL (Site & Buildings) 86,663,250 21,039,6633 107,702,913 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 6.4 IMPLEMENTATION < VI' Costs It should be noted that costs in this report (and virtually any construc- tion project) are differentiated as Construction Costs, Soft Costs and Project Costs. This is an important distinction when comparing costs, but even more important when budgeting future projects. Construction Cost + Soft Costs = Project Cost Typical Project Cost Breakdown 757o Construction Cost (site and buildings) 257o Non -Bldg Cost (or "soft" cost) 1007o Project Cost Typical Ranges of Non -Building Costs 2-4% Utilities (basic, i.e., sources available nearby) 2-47o Landscaping 8-107o Furnishings, Fixtures & Equipment (FF+E) (may incl data/technology/wiring) (incl internal wayfinding signage) 1-27o Miscellaneous (testing, permits, etc.) 7-9% Arch/ engineering fees (add 257o for remodeling projects) 3-207o Contingency (normal range: New = 2-57o, Remodel=15-25%) Contingency Fund For most projects, 3-5% should be allocated for a Contingency fund at beginning of construction. For remodelings, a minimum of 15% is recommended but can vary considerably dependent on project. Escalation Note: All costs are estimated in November 2003 dollars. For budget- ing future projects, costs should be escalated bi-annually, or as a mini- mum, annually for inflation. For future planned projects, costs should be projected forward to mid -point of actual construction period. Note: The State of Minnesota Department of Administration (Finance Division) is currently using 4.57o annually for inflation. However, it should be noted that inflation is at a historically very low level. NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 6.5 APPENDICES fiPP GLOSSARY 0 A GLOSSARY OF SELECTED TERMS Assignable Square Feet Areas of a building assigned to, or available to, an occupant except (ASF) Custodial Area, Circulation Area, Mechanical Area and Building Struc- tural elements). Normally, all areas supporting instructional efforts, directly or indi- rectly. Building Programming The process, or resulting document, which is a generalized prescription for a proposed facility. Prescriptive elements include: square footage for specific, individual functions/ spaces (as opposed to space utilization planning which is an averaged based square footage projection tool); number of stations; number of users; functions to be performed; tech- nical requirements (mechanical, electrical, lighting, etc.); fixed equip- ment; loose equipment; furnishings required; etc. Building Efficiency The Net Assignable Square Feet (NASF or ASF) divided by the Gross Square Feet (GSF). Capital Development A building program outlining the capital construction projects to be initiated, Program their relative priorities, and the projected costs of each project. A statement of the capital resources required to accom- plish an institution's goals and objectives. Classroom A room used by classes which do not require special-purpose equip- ment for student use. Typically, they are provided with writing sur- faces for lectures. Full Time Equivalent Represents one student carrying what the institution considers to be a full, normal academic credit load. Full Year Equivalent Represents one faculty or staff member working what the institution considers to be a full, calendar year. Generic Classroom/Lab A classroom or lab whose use is not restricted by departmental or pro- gram control. Typically, lab spaces cannot be considered generic. Gross Square Feet Sum of the floor areas including the outside faces of exterior walls for (GSF) all stories or areas, which have floor surface. Head Count The total number of students, including both part-time and full-time. NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS APP A.1 GLOSSARY 0 A Room Utilization A numerical value, usually set by institutions, which specifies the expected Standard Weekly Room Use (WRU). Laboratory Space A space designed and/or furnished with specialized equipment to serve the needs of a particular area of study for group instruction in regularly scheduled classes. The design and / or equipment in such room normally precludes its use for other areas of study. (See Room Ownership.) Room "Ownership" Any room, particularly classrooms and laboratories, whose use is restricted by departmental or program control. Section One or more students formally organized for instruction in a specific course under the supervision of an instructor. Space Management The allocation of an institutions facilities resources to the various orga- nizational units, usually though application of detailed planning and programming methodologies. Station The total facilities required to accommodate one person. Station Count The number of stations in a room. Station Utilization Rate The average number of hours per week each station is used: (SUR) SUR = total weekly student hours total number of stations Weekly Faculty One hour spent by one faculty member in contact with a scheduled Contact Hour instructional section. Weekly Student One hour spent by one student in a scheduled instructional section. Contact Hour (WSCH) Weekly Room Use The number of hours a room is used per week for scheduled course (WRU) activities. SOURCE: Higher Education Facilities Planning and Management Technical Report No. 14. NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS APP A.2 INSTRUCTIONAL SPACE SUMMARIES B . 'INSTRUCTIONAL SPACE SUMMARY APPENDIX E B SPACE CATEGORIES SUMMARY Refer to 2001 Space Utilization Study for detail O N N O m m r M o0 O c0 m O O CA r m 00 to r O i LL m m 0 CR N� sr 1` N V O O N M Cp m 0 ICJ r rn IIY C) O cV O m O N O CO ..�C}} V O O O A M Cl) Co N ILo N M 0 0 W O r m to M N O M Co C:, !� N m g an M F r IA r r O 0 CC M M m m o0 a CI .- t0 N Cl) r"O v_ r �? O 0 O M Ln m r r1 N CA IA r IA 00 N N v_ m CO an " tp A 0 O O O O M m M �--' N N CO N' r Ch OD sY to CA M N N N r Ii"1 Cl) N it � CA O O O O I O I I I CO � l I O O O O I tp N O O �, M v r cp N r M O N r r Co 00 O tp C, In 1n In C,I I I I I I I m Co r to ��M� m u1 M m v I I I I I I I I I I a N o � Co m 4 N_ CO N st M N CmNv� 0 LnM r O N N O O I I I O I I I O I I I I O O O N O N00 O O O Co --T N Oro Cop IMA r-- M W M CO N v ao VIII VIII C�,IIII O O O O o tDto womo c O I I I O I I I I O O O O O 7 R 0 0 0 N 0 O tp (O O O i I N NM r I r I m to I m C� I a0 l0 N N N IA In IA of O m O O Co M CA U7 IA r N 0 r 0 m r 00 N M M M m m O lA r p CV M to CV t0 N m M a O oo I I I�CN I I Cli N rnrn N S O O o o , OOcoQ � Z Co N T N a -- a2 O O O O I I m r Com- M and 00 0 CD N M O O Cp N N Cp Co O iA m to N N N N M _CCL O N M O U O m N N �• I m Nt' O O I I M I M (`• �• O CoN m O O to O I Co tp Co coON 0 u•1 N 000 r m 00 r �- N N CV t•"i N M p st 0 WC�- C- r r M COO r I N •- O Co M m C`• �- O N �' O O r Co O , O e{ Co N r N w 0 M Co M 1� N CO f� �' CV N N Ln Co _ CO OO to y M M cD I I m I n o C2 M r r to O O m M Co c to o , O r Co r 000 In Cp Co top r O CA IA to 'o CO t" m m O N O r O M O , Co O CO OC 0 m M lA CO .- W m N r CO V N M m t0 M Cp N Lo CA r Ort 00j 00p It[ N V' O' OO .--- t0 �� N N N o0 to CO a0 m M r O N � LL r co CL UL a H R C G �:. + � O Cn 0] N 00 O d OS typ + d J -0 N j d' N V N LD = m �CjI^y d •N E N .�.. N J~ N N y N Q N Q r-l0 Q O Z $ A< 2 o> ami J O o o c Q Vi � N Y m V - p v cc •i0 W d c d.... 16 O J H d N d w�. •C 7 m C N N E E E N V O Q C d c CL d R y L` Is y I._�� W (0 C) N UUInD ,a N N O Q J QUO •� N 0 0 OtL (nUU U) Q d 7 d N d •Q ` 7 C1 fn .p �.c Ey NQ ~O N U co 2 G' y UL) h 30 IA In 3,2a2�Z CD cz, O^CD C) 0 0 0 L O z O o O N N N N N 0 M M M M Cl) s{ O to O Co O r O to C m X r N NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS APP B.1 MEETING MINUTES] MEETING MINUTES APPENDIX C MEETING MINUTES Note: Meeting minutes reflect the two different time periods under which the planning efforts were performed. The initial planning effort was based on 1600 FTE under an interim president. The second portion of the planning effort was based on 2400 FTE under newly appointed President Dr. Cureton. 14 June 2001 MEMO TO: Master Campus Plan Committee FROM: Kay Stroyny, Committee Secretary DATE: June 18, 2001 SUBJECT: Minutes from June 14, 2001 meeting Present: Dr. Hal Miller, Dr. Barb Lindman, Dr. Gerry Bouma, Dr. Jerry Beilby, Jane Goedeke, Matt Hill, Mark Baden, Phil Lacher, Dr. Doug Huffman, Dr. Tim Tomlinson and Kay Stroyny Absent: Monica Groves, Steve Morrow and Dale Solberg 1. Introduction: Hal Miller gave an overview of what the committee will need to accomplished in the next couple of months. The committee will be using the information from the space utilization study from Partners and Sirny and the estimate of space needs for academic programs and academic support services. The committee must present a list of prioritized needs to Joe Smith by August 1, 2001. 2. Reviewed Estimate of Space needs for Academic Programs and Academic Support Services: Barb Lindman reviewed the presuppositions of the study: Enrollment cap of 1600 student FTE: Discussed why 1600 FTE was chosen verse other numbers. The enrollment number will affect classrooms, office space, etc. Phil reported that in 1996, the city of Roseville Phase II Plan Unit Development (PUD) approval was extended to August 2001. The PUD plan has approved footings for a dorm. Courses taught during 8 period academic week - The board has been debating the 8 a.m. - 3 p.m. school day. The board wanted the day to run from 8 a.m. - 5 p.m., but the problem is about 788 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS APP C.1 APPENDIX 0 C' students are registered for something after 3 p.m. Square footage calculations for classrooms are based on 15 square feet per student and the space utilization study uses a different square footage number, but their findings are very close. FT faculty teaches approximately 81% of courses - This number impacts facility offices. General Purpose Classroom Space Needs: Northwestern has 27 general purpose classrooms available during the 8 period day. Several classrooms have features that make thein less desirable for classrooms. The carousels include 1/5th of our classroom space and they were not designed to be classroom and N136 used to be a storeroom. The student center classrooms were not included in this report because they just starting using them last summer. The student center classrooms are included in the space study done by Larry Page. Conclusion: 13, 300 Sq. ft is needed for general purpose classrooms. NWC could get more space by decking Riley or Nazareth infill. General Discussion on FTE: There was discussion about using a different FTE number and how it would affect the College. If we cut back on FTE it would out costs, but there are other items to consider. Jerry Bouma expressed the need for cubic feet of a room in order to fit bigger instruments into a room. Long-range planning committee - There is no long-range planning committee anymore. The long-range plan was presented to everyone, but the final draft never was approved. The decisions of this committee will have a big impact on the next campaign. 3. Space Utilization Study by Partners & Sirny - Executive Summarv: Phil gave an overview of the space study done by Larry Page. Larry was charged to tell us where the College is short on space (office, classrooms, etc). - The study found that the office size is actually larger than industry standard but we are not going to change them. The study supported the fact that there are not enough facilities to accommodate our needs. Phil recommended utilizing Larry Page to help us finish the report. It was decided that Larry should come to the next meeting. Phil will contact Larry. NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS APP C.2 APPENDIX C The food service area has a space shortage. Recommenda- tions from the study include expanding the dining room area, change dining eating time and chapel time. The bookstore could be bigger. Lounges - Although adequate total square footage of lounge space is provided, it would be desirable to have a higher percentage of total lounge space. The committee discussed what other colleges have as a student center or student union and thought they should consider this as a possibility, but would like to hear ideas from Monica Groves. Parking - The committee questioned if there was enough parking on campus for 1600 FTE. Phil reported there are around 1,000 parking spaces and the College purchased a bus for the shuttle service. About 2 years ago, Bethel decided that freshman couldn't have a car on campus unless they worked. Handout: Hal Miller handed out a project for all the committee members to complete by the next meeting on Thursday, June 21 at 9:00 a.m. Please type your report. 21 June 2001 MEMO TO: Master Campus Plan Committee FROM: Kay Stroyny, Committee Secretary DATE: June 21, 2001 SUBJECT: Minutes from June 21, 2001 meeting Present: Dr. Hal Miller, Dr. Barb Lindman, Dr. Gerry Bouma, Dr. Jerry Beilby, Jane Goedeke, Matt Hill, Phil Lacher, Dr. Doug Huffman, Dr. Tim Tomlinson, Kay Stroyny, Monica Groves, Dale Solberg and Steve Morrow Absent: Mark Baden Guest: Larry Page from Partners and Sirny Hal Miller introduced Larry Page to the committee. Larry made a few comments and emphasized the College's= mission will affect how we want to use our space. The minutes from the June 14, 2001 meeting were approved with a minor change. The minuets indicated R116 as a storeroom but it should read N136 as a storeroom. Note: Hal Miller stated it is ok for the committee members to share this information with other people. NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS APP C.3 APPENDIX 1. Enrollment Expectations Handout: Doug Huffman, Dean of Admissions & Records gave his report and pointed out the following items. Property - The campus must be prepared for about 1,700 students to average 1,600 FTE for a school year. Mission -The facilities affect how we are going to do our mission and space is needed to make it happen, but we should not let space completely dictate our mission. Markets - There are 3 areas to consider when marketing the college. Demographics - 58% of NWC's student body come from MN and 30 % from WI, IA, ND, SD, and IL. It is important to note that the "echo boom" (children of the "baby boomers") is to hit its high school graduation peak in Minnesota in 2003 with 63,165 graduates, more than any year since the 1980's. The CCCU discovered that the biggest competitors to Christian institutions for Christian students are public institutions like the U of M because of perceived quality and affordability. Target Audience - The College's pool of potential students for traditional day school is limited. The enrollment surge in 2000-2001 and record retention has put us two years in advance of the projection model to reach the 1,600 FTE goal. Affordability - NWC is already too expensive for the families that send their students here according to the comparison of price to estimated family wealth. Schools like Bethel charge more, but their families can afford it. NWC may need to raise awareness and have a different marketing scheme. Discussion: Barb commented that the CCCU 3 top institutions have noted for retention the cost, size and spiritually. The larger the size the higher the retention. Larry Page commented that once Northwestern reaches 1600 FTE we might have to be more selective in certain areas (students, majors, etc). 2. General Classroom Needs Handout: Dr. Barb Lindman, Dean of Curriculum and Instruction gave her report and pointed out the following items. Based from the space study from Partners & Sirny and NWC course enrollment data, it is estimated that an additional �a 6„293 square feet of general use classroom space is needed 3 R 5%FTS `%.ccommodate an FTE of 1600. If the less -than -desirable LASS kee off, classrooms are not used the total needed is 13,818 square feet. The new media building could have room for classes, but because of the distance of the building more time would be needed to pass to the next class. See tables 1-5 in handout for specific data. NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS APP CA i APPENDIX 0 C Discussion: The concern arose that Riley does not have an elevator and some students are not able to get to the second floor. Phil commented that the Riley building was grand -fathered in and if there is any major remodeling done to the building an elevator would have to be installed. The dark room door in the Art lab will be made handicap accessible to accommodate students needs. 3. Alternative Education handout: Dr. Tim Tomlinson, Dean of Alternative Education gave his report and pointed out the following items. Tim gave a short overview of the programs: FOCUS - on campus classes in the evenings Pathways Project - on and off campus classes in the evening Distance Education - off campus classes Personal Enrichment - classes meet at night and weekends on campus Urban Bible Institute - no space needs MacLaurin Institute - on site at the U of M Quito campus - Ecuador Graduate program - this is not a reality yet, but would need classrooms and administrative offices There will be a greater need in the next 15 years for office space, classroom space and production area. The production area would be use for video conferencing and media projects. Some of the projected space needs could be located off campus, but not all of it. There is also an indirect space need that would put more pressure on other areas on campus such as information technologies, financial aid, business office, admissions and student development. Discussion: Larry bought up a concern for the space need of the graduate program. Tim explained the graduate programs would be similar to Capella University. Classes would be over the internet with residential requirements in the summer time, which would need to be worked out with Event Services. 4. Student Development Handout: Monica Groves, Dean of Student Development gave her report and pointed out the following items. Using the 1600 FTE number there would be 1708 students enrolled by fall of 2005. The proposed resident/commuter student ratio would be 70% on campus housing and 30% commuting. Only 27 % of the commuting students are provided lockers. NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS APP C.5 APPENDIX C The newly created commuter lounge has helped. Monica feels that our campus is not very welcoming to commuters due to not having enough lounge space, not enough lockers and over crowding in Nazareth Cafe. There is not a good location for students to socialize during the day. Students have been using the Nazareth Cafe and the 211d floor of Nazareth Hall. An ideal dining area would consist of being brightly lighted, noise reduction, bigger dish return area and better entry to the cafeteria to eliminate theft problems. Discussion: Larry mentioned that the lounge space and office space issues are consistent with what he found. 5. Dormitories Handout: Phil Lacher, AVP of Physical Plant/Aux. Services gave his report on the following items. We are beyond the capacity in housing. The College places 4 freshman to a room to adhere to the College's policy of housing students 20 year of age and younger. The actual percent to student housing to FTE is 991 + 41 = 1,032 student housed which is 69% The College will need to invest $13,000 to make the Snelling Terrace pool available to the students. There are no other buildings that are within walking distance to the College. The college was blessed to have the opportunity to buy South, Southeast and Snelling Terrace. There are a couple of medical buildings by Snelling Terrace but the owners of one of the building do not want to sell to NWC at this time. The College's Rcseville Campus PUD (plan unit development) expires August 1, 2001. Phil is currently working with the city on our options. Parking is a big issue. The total number of parking spaces is 1,840. The back area of Riley could be expanded to add 85 more parking spaces but it won't solve the current problem. Discussion: Discussed limiting freshman cars on campus and that the Cabinet and Board would make the final decision. Larry mentioned that limiting parking at colleges is -very common. The committee was interested in finding more- information on parking fees and parking lot maintenance. Note: The committee would like to make a recommendation about limiting parking in their report. Note: Public/private funding should be explored. 6. Athletics Handout: Matt Hill, Athletic Director gave his report on the following items. He currently has 5 areas NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS APP C.6 - Reynolds field, Ericksen center, Tennis courts, Riley gym and soccer field. The soccer teams use a field located by Presbyterian Homes. If Presbyterian Homes decides to expand, there would be a huge concern for a soccer field. Tennis courts are excellent. The College doesn't always use 6 courts. Riley gym is used for intramurals. Reynolds field will need to be re -done in the future. - Last season, 31 contests were held on the field. Most colleges have two separate fields for soccer and football. - There are no lights on the fields so this is a concern if the school day is extended. Installing lights on the field would help student not miss class during the day. - One option when redoing the field is to install SprinTurf. It is a less expensive and a better alternative than turf. (see handout) A recreation/student center could serve the needs of the students. It could hold a recreational area, dining lounges. Discussion: Larry brought up that it would be beneficial to consolidate the dining areas to one central location. 7. Science and Mathematics Handout: Dr. Jerry Beilby, Dept. Chair for Science & Math gave his report. The development of programs will be in quality once we reach 1600 FTE. See page 2 of handout for space requirement bases on program developments. Nature Trail on campus is a wonderful resource and outdoor classroom. Note: Larry Page will check on what other colleges have considered as a plateau number. We will finish the rest of the reports at the next meeting on Thursday, June 28 at 9:00 a.m. in the BRC - A. 28 June 2001 MEMO TO: Campus Master Plan Committee FROM: Kay Stroyny, Committee Secretary DATE: June 29, 2001 SUBJECT: Minutes from June 28, 2001 meeting Present: Dr. Hal Miller, Dr. Barb Lindman, Dr. Gerry Bouma, Jane Goedeke; Phil Lacher, Dr. Doug Huffman, Kay Stroyny, Monica Groves, Dale Sol - NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS APP C.7 I berg and Steve Morrow, Bruce Simat and Susan Johnson Absent: Dr. Jerry Beilby, Matt Hill and Dr. Tim Tomlinson Visitor: Larry Page from Partners and Sirny Several changes were made to the June 21, 2001 minutes. Kay sent the revised minutes to all committee members via e-mail. Susan Johnson from the education department will be submitting her report to Hal Miller. Bruce Simat represented Jerry Beilby's area since he could not attend. 1. Music Handout: Dr. Gerry Bouma, Chair of Music Department gave his report. Rehearsal areas must be able to fit large instruments (including high ceilings). All the music rooms must be equipped with specialized presentation equipment, including pianos and be treated acoustically. Office space - Private lessons are taught in a majority of part-time faculty offices, which becomes a problem when two or more faculty share an office. Sound transference is a big issue when teaching in the middle of other faculty offices. Private lessons may have an impact in the future. Classroom space problems - Rehearsal time is reduced because time is needed to set up and tear down the room. Music Academy offers private lessons to children in the afternoon and evening (home -schooled, elementary and high school kids). The program is separate from the music department but they use the practice rooms for private lessons. It would be hard to give up this program but it could help free up time and eliminate some of the space problems. Nazareth Hall - It is very difficult to find rehearsal time in the chapel because it is shared with event services. Addressed the need for a lounge in the Fine Arts building. Ideal Space Needs: It would be ideal to have one classroom available for regular music classes. This classroom would need a presentation space for a piano, stereo and video equipment. Due to the size of the music department, there should be a minimum of 16 studio/offices. There are currently 7 studio/offices aiid 9 more are needed. It would be nice to have 3 large rehearsal areas on the same level as Maranatha stage (band, choir and rehearsal space). It is very difficult to move big items from one floor to the next because not everything fits in the elevator. There is a need for 8-10 additional practice rooms. The department chair's office should be part of the main NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS APP C.8 APPENDIX C l music office and 3-4 additional offices available for those who don't teach private lessons (band director) Discussion: A short-term solution is decking Nazareth gym and moving the practice modules. The long-term solution is building a music wing on the southwest side of Maranatha to match the northeast wing. Phil has the Arden Hills master plan that shows where the footprints are located. Gerry, Phil and Larry will meet to sketch out some ideas. The idea of building a balcony in the auditorium was discussed but the whole auditorium would have to be reconfigured and would end up costing a lot of money. The music library has out grown its current space in the basement. 2. Art De-partment Handout: Hal Miller read Mark Baden's handout. The student population in the department of art and graphic design has been growing since 1992 when visual art education was added to the majors available at NWC. The number of majors has tripled since 1990, a period of only ten years. (see handout) The art department will need 8 office spaces for 3 full-time and 5 part-time faculty for 2001/2002. The Art department would have enough space if they take over the area used by the music office, practice rooms and choir on first floor. Discussion: Deck Nazareth gym and use the top area for the Art department. Phil will check on the cost of redesigning Nazareth and moving the studios. Hal mentioned that the broadcasting area space needs should also be reported. One idea was to move the broadcasting studio to the media building but the problem is the basement is not deep enough. Note: The committee needs to decide what they want to put on the two floors of the new radio building. 3. Event Services Handout: Jane Goedeke, Manager of Event Services gave her report. Last year outside events brought an additional $860,000 into the college. The College nets about 30%. If we forego this money, it can be a serious problem to the college. Certain events are more profitable than others. The foodservice/catering has been profitable. NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS APP C.9 Maranatha stage - Scheduling for concerts and rehearsals are difficult. Rehearsals usually take place the day prior to the concert causing the stage to be reset for chapel the next day and then again reset for the concert. There is room for 1600 students in the auditorium. The Edge is a student led worship discipleship group. The Edge would prefer to be in the auditorium but it is moved to Nazareth chapel for 10 weeks out of the year because of scheduling conflicts. The Nazareth chapel is not sufficient for setup and the number of students that attend. Nazareth Chapel is in such a high demand between music classes, rehearsals during the week and weddings on weekends. The college could schedule fewer weddings if musical performances increased during the school year. One option would be not to schedule weddings during the school year but only during breaks. The idea was brought up for a separate chapel building. The problem is where to put it. Theater- There is a huge scheduling problem for drama vignettes rehearsals. A scene -shop is being built by the ball field. Discussion: Discussed the idea of using the Erickson center for chapel. Jane mentioned that is takes two days to set up the chairs on the floor with the bleachers pulled out to seat 2300 people for graduation day. Students may have a problem associating it as chapel verses a place for athletics. 4. Library Handout: Dale Solberg, Director of Library Services gave his report. It has been 8 academic years since moving into the Berntsen building. We have found there isn't nearly enough space for growth. We have moved very aggressively into web-based/electronic formats but the need for the traditional format has not lessened. A 20 -year growth capacity was determined when the library was built in 1992, however the stacks are now at, and in some areas, over capacity. There is a safety concern when filling the stack full and the space between the stacks has also changed to 42 inches. The lights on the ceiling would have to be changed if the stacks were moved. In 1999, we added Cooperating Libraries in Consortium (CLIC) which allows online and physical access to the collections of 13 other libraries. In 2000, the Elmer Anderson Library at the University of Minnesota became available for permanent storage of journals. There is a need for at least 10 public workstations NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS APP C.10 APPENDIX ■ C due to converting 12 study carrels to electronic public workstations. The seating capacity seems to be inflated. If one does not count the seats available for specialize/unique usage, there is a seating capacity for only about 160 individuals (about 10% of student head count). More faculty and staff offices are needed. Part of a storage room was converted to a small office. The archive room can only handle a small collection. To accommodate scholars, this room should be doubled or tripled in size. Media Services is located in the lower level of the BRC but it doesn't need to be in the library. Possible Solutions: Distribute collections to other areas of the campus. Build an attachment or a free standing building on the South end of the current library. Note: Larry will check to see what the new standard number is between the stacks. He will also check on the standards for seat capacity for the library. 5. Technology Handout: Steve Morrow, Director of Information Technologies gave his report. The technology area is scheduled to be renovated in the coming fiscal year. This will allow more room for current growth needs. - George Ryon's office will be expanded - The restrooms will still be maintained. - Current business office storage will be moved to a storeroom by the president's entrance. - Potential growth for staffing needs in Information Systems could happen. Steve wants to get technology bridged with other depart- ments. - A good example is Jeff Wahl, he works in the technology department but his office is located in the library. - Distributing Education to all classes electronically. (Distance Education) It would be ideal to have a student support space for computer in Snelling Terrace and Southeast residences. The College will be requiring students to bring a laptop, but don't anticipate less lab space needed. There is a need for proper storage areas. Assignment for July 17, 2001 meeting: (Please bring assign- ment to the next meeting) NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS APP C.11 APPENDIX C Committee members need to come up with a conceptual idea of the building or area they have expressed the need for. You don't need to be thinking architecturally but sketch out what needs to be in the building and what maybe involved. 17 July 2001 MEMO TO: Campus Master Plan Committee FROM: Kay Stroyny, Committee Secretary DATE: July 17, 2001 SUBJECT: Minutes from July 17, 2001 meeting Present: Dr. Hal Miller, Dr. Barb Lindman, Matt Hill, Dr. Tim Tomlinson, Dr. Susan Johnson, Monica Groves, Steve Morrow, Kay Stroyny, Mark Baden and Dr. Jerry Beilby Absent: Dr. Gerry Bouma, Jane Goedeke, Phil Lacher, Dr. Doug Huffman, and Dale Solberg Visitor: Larry Page The minutes from June 28, 2001 were approved as submitted. Doug Huffman's report was handed out to the committee to review. Department of Education Space Needs Handout: Dr. Susan Johnson gave her report and noted the following items. The following presuppositions were added for the dept. of education. - Upper methods courses are estimated at the current limit of 20 students. - Education core classes estimated at current limit of 25 students. - Classrooms for methodology courses need to be set up with tables. - Education courses cannot be limited to 8 - 3 p.m. They also have days off -campus for cooperating school placements. General Purpose Classroom - There has been a 23% growth rate in the education dept. - We will need the ability to schedule at least 10 sections of classes per term in a computer lab. - The Riley gym is currently a back up space for activities. - The Blue Room and Youderian Lounge have also been used but scheduling is difficult and unreliable do to events. Specialized Classrooms - We currently have 3 classrooms designated for elementary NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS APP C.12 APPENDIX]ff C l education/ESL/general methods. Two more additional class- rooms are needed for . a total of 5 classrooms. Faculty Offices - Recommend an additional 5 full-time offices and 4 part-time offices - The education office is required to keep licensure files on each student, so additional space is needed for storing files. Child Development Center - Recommends assigning 3 offices in the new media building. One for the director and 2 offices for full time teachers. Plus having a conference space in the new media building. Discussion: Hal Miller mentioned they have to be carefully when designating a lot of offices in the new media building due to parking issues. Student Development Handout: Monica reported ideas for adding a new service building on campus. It would be ideal to have it in the center of campus. Option One: A building between Riley and the dorms that would contain the service offices, campus dining and could be connected with a field house. It would be ideal to have only one cafe on campus. It would be easier for trucks to deliver to the cafe if the main road was moved. Parking would be a big issue especially if there is a main entrance to this building. Option 2: A separate building between Riley and Nazareth containing the cafe and services offices. Discussion: Larry mentioned if the main road route were changed it would keep the center of the campus pedestrian friendly. The PUD footprints of the dormitory would mainly affect the placing of the field house. Classroom space could be available in the building. Monica mentioned the admissions office should be more accessible on campus. Larry mentioned this would draw more traffic to the area and could be a problem. He suggested a separate building would be a better option. The cafeteria could be on the second floor and would have a better view. Athletic Handout: Matt's idea is to build a field house where the tennis courts are located. This is assuming the Riley gym is decked for classroom and faculty offices. The field house could be connected to the service building. NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS APP C.13 APPENDIX 0 C The building would be 160' X 300'. The building would be about the size of Bethel's field house. The floor of the field house would include locker rooms, lines for volleyball, tennis and basketball. Discussion: We could have a problem with the city on the visual aspect of the building and parking if we build a separate building. It would depend on how it is presented to the city neighbors. The powerhouse is a good location but it would cost too much to move it. A trade off with the neighbors to get what we want could be to make the lake front more appealing to the neighbors. Department of Science and Math Handout: The Breccia project could work but it is not ideal. A better option would be to build a separate building 200 feet away from little Lake Johanna on the West Side of the Powerhouse. A new building could contain 5 labs, 4 project labs, 3 lab prep/storerooms, 10 faculty offices, department computer lab, 2 admin offices, animal room and 2 medium classrooms. Discussion: Hal mentioned if the education department moves to the KTIS area and Focus moves out then maybe this space could be an option for science and math. The next meeting is on Thursday, July 19, 2001 in the Youderian Lounge. 19 July 2001 MEMO TO: Campus Master Plan Committee FROM: Kay Stroyny, Committee Secretary DATE: July 19, 2001 SUBJECT: Minutes from July 19, 2001 meeting Present: Dr. Hal Miller, Dr. Barb Lindman, Matt Hill, Dr. Tim "i i linson, Dr. Susan Johnson, Monica Groves, Steve Morrow, Kay Stroyny, Mark Baden, Jane Goedeke, Dr, Gerry Bouma, Dr. Doug Huffman and Dr. Jerry Beilby Absent: Phil Lacher and Dale Solberg Visitor: Larry Page NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS APP C.14 APPENDIX 0 C Hal mentioned the centennial campaign would be divided into 2 phases. The first phase will include the media building, so the committee will not have to rush to complete their report. Music Department Handout: Gerry Bouma presented adding a wing to the Fine Arts building. The ceiling in the instrumental rehearsal room will need to be higher than normal. The choral rehearsal room could also be used as a small recital room if needed. The rehearsal rooms are mostly used in the afternoon. The classrooms in the new wing addition could be also be used for general-purpose classes since they would not be used all the time. It would cost $178,000 to install 7 new practice rooms in the new wing. The top floor of the wing would have studio/office space for teachers. It would cost $38,535 to relocate the present practice rooms to the Nazareth gym. - The College would be responsible to remove the fire sprinklers and have the Nazareth floor ready for the practice rooms. - The company would provide a supervisor for 10 days, but the College would have to provide 10 people and trucks to move the units. Discussion: If this wing was added, the music office could evacuate their present area leaving it open for the art department. Jane mentioned there could be problems fitting 1700 students in the auditorium. Usually, during the first month of school, students have to sit on the floor for chapel in the auditorium. A closed circuit overflow area could be set up for chapel, but the equipment would need to be purchased. The space above the event services area could be made into offices for event services if the new wing is built. There was concern that there is not an elevator in the wing proposal. Hal mentioned storage space is also a high concern for departments. Media Building Ideas: Susan mentioned her ideas for the new media building. - 3 classrooms for 20 - 25 students with tables for the NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS APP C.15 education department 1 computer lab - 3 offices - Conference room Tim Tomlinson suggested that Focus would. need about 3,000 square feet in the new building. - Classroom - Conference room - Computer lab Hal suggested that Tim and Susan meet to coordinate ideas. Information Technologies: Vertical storage space is needed in the media building for I.T. Eventually more office space will be needed for the information system staff. The offices should be in close proximity of each other. New Service Building Discussion: It would be ideal to have all the service departments (financial aid, business office, bookstore, admissions, etc) together. A one-stop shop for students. The cafe area should be kept separate from the service area. The building would have meeting rooms not classrooms. There is some concern for having only one kitchen on campus and that it would be in a separate building away from the Blue Room. - The blue room could have a warming kitchen, however the quality of food may suffer. - The Nazareth infill building would eliminate the kitchen dilemma. - Larry mentioned by adding the infill it will change the ascetics of the building. Students may need more time to pass between classes depending where this building is located. Parking would be a problem if the building were built between the dorms and Riley. Decking Riley would cost $1.5 million and would gain 11,000 square feet. - There would be more activity on that side of campus if the Riley gym were decked. - The ALFA center and music practice rooms could be moved to the 2nd floor of the gym. - Matt mentioned that the athletic department would have to cut back on activities if the gym was decked. Parking Discussion: Limiting freshman parking on campus. Larry mentioned that limiting parking at colleges is very common. NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS APP C.16 If students could get paid higher wages on campus, then students could work on campus and not need a car. The department of education demands sophomores to have a vehicle. Parking and lounges are a retention issue for students especially for commuters. Mark B. would rather expand the parking lots to accom- modate the number of students than to limit the number of cars because it affects the quality of life. The College may have to provide more activities for students if more students are here on weekends. The committee would like to find out what the current parking fee is to obtain a permit and parking lot priority. The next step: Larry Page handed out a preliminary project outline to the committee. Larry would like the committee members to develop their own department goals. A handout will be sent out before the September meeting to help develop these goals. A draft report will be developed from the department goals. The goals will determine prioritize. The next meeting will be held in September. The date and time of the meeting has not been set. 30 October 2001 MEMO TO: Campus Master Plan Committee FROM: Kay Stroyny, Committee Secretary DATE: October 30, 2001 SUBJECT: Minutes from October 30, 2001 Present: Dr. Hal Miller, Dr. Barb Lindman, Dr. Tim Tomlinson, Monica Groves, Mark Baden, Jane Goedeke, Dr, Gerry Bouma, Dr. _Doug Huffman and Dr. Jerry Beilby Absent: Matt Hill, Dr. Susan Johnson and Steve Morrow New Members: Asa Ferguson and Kevin Robinson Guest: Larry Page, Partners and Sirny Architects Handouts: Sample overview of XYZ College Campus Master Plan Goal Setting - Collegiate Institutional Planning NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS APP C.17 Hal Miller mentioned that the campus master plan committee is to move forward with Phase H. The question arose if the Nazareth gym would be decked this summer. The gym would probably not be decked due to budget needs. GOALS & OBJECTIVES: Larry Page told the committee that the next step in developing the master plan is to gather goals and objectives. In order to develop your goals and objectives, the committee will need to look at a 5 - 7 year period and a 15 - 30 year period. You may already have some department goals gathered from previous meetings as well as from reviewing the strategic plan. Larry passed out sample handouts for the committee to review. Once the goals and objectives are completed, Larry will assemble all the information into one single document. The next step will be for the committee to prioritize the items. Larry will gather together the academic goals and show how they will affect the facility aspect of the campus. Any objective conflicts in Larry's final document will be noted and discussed with the committee. Larry mentioned the campus master plan is a good communication tool that will help get the word out to the constituents and convey to the board the justification of these expenses. The committee may want to involve a member of the board after Larry has gathered all the information into one report. Hal confirmed to the committee that the board is committed to the campus master plan. Hal will be in touch will the committee members to tell them their assignment. Next Meeting - TBA NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS APP C.18 APPENDIX C The following pages include meeting minutes from meetings during the second phase of planning. 27 May 2003 A meeting of the Campus Master Plan Committee of Northwest- ern College was convened on Tuesday, May 27, 2003 at 1:10 p.m. in the Youderian Lounge. Members Present: Doug Schroeder Matt Hill Monica Groves Barb Lindman Jane Goedeke Doug Huffman Tim Tomlinson Mark Baden Gerry Bouma Rod Loeffler Dan Crane Asa Ferguson Cheryl Seiffert John Delich Randy Riesberg Steve Morrow Dale Solberg Ruth Ball Guest Present: Mr. Larry Page, Partners & Sirny Doug Schroeder called the meeting to order and opened in prayer. An introduction of the committee members took place. Doug Schroeder gave an overview of the Campus Master Plan Committee. Agendas were distributed. Doug Schroeder shared with the Committee that the previous CMP group was designed to focus on 1600 students. Dr. Cureton and the Long Range Strategic Planning Committee is focusing on 2400 FTE's by 2020. We have been growing at a rate slightly above 4%, which would bring us to the growth of 2400 by 2017. We need to look at slowing down the growth rate. Doug Schroeder gave the charge of the Campus Master Plan Committee and introduced Larry Page from Partners and Sirny and also read a memo from Dr. Hal Miller, the co-chair of the committee, who was unable to attend due to a scheduling conflict. Dr. Miller's memo shared his thoughts on the campus master plan process and the time frame for the balance of 2003. Doug Schroeder asked if any members of the previous CMP Committee had any comments relating to previous work done by the Committee. Discussion took place on the need to do major adjustments from 1600 to the 2400. The need to look at our programs some will NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS APP C.19 APPENDIX E C be based on facility necessity. Our thinking needs to change. We need to think outside of the box. The question was asked if the campus is large enough to handle 2400 FTE? Doug Schroeder addressed the Committee with some thoughts of growth and that the campus could handle the 2400 FTE with qualifications. Discussion took place about the North Minneapolis campus and Oak Hills from previous CMP meetings and the possible options of an off site campus. Doug Schroeder turned the meeting over to Larry Page. Larry gave an overview of how the planning process can have a domino affect. Academic, Facilities and Finance all go together for campus planning. In our thinking and planning, Larry would like us to focus not on just our areas but the campus as a whole and how that will be affected with a FTE of 2400 driven by academics. Once those things have been determined then we can focus on the support services. Look at your programs from where they have been and the demographics. The demographics are leveling off. NWC has a unique product, which we have to keep in mind as well. We need to keep the mission of the organization in mind and plan around that. Projections of FTE's 2400- some adjustments of facilities on campus would need to be made and an addition of a new building(s). Larry Page mentioned a discussion with himself and Dr. Cureton about the Powerhouse and the loss of that building and the possibilities of building a student center there. There would be compliances with the DNR, building and city ordinance to consider. Doug Schroeder mentioned the deferred maintenance study of the campus. The older campus buildings of Nazareth and Riley are OK to remodel except the Powerhouse. These buildings need to be renovated, so how do we do that while continuing to grow? Currently we have a 15 million dollar deferred maintenance deficit. How do we bring the buildings up to spec while maintaining current service levels? Larry Page shared what he would like to see the CMP group accomplish. How will academic programs expand? What programs would we consider offering? How much classroom space or lab space is needed? Larry mentioned the need to look at the market place and what is being offered. Larry discussed what options we have as far as building a facility to hold the 2400 students for chapel or do we hold a couple of services along with possible options for food services. Larry mentioned central scheduling software. He mentioned high schools and block scheduling, time scheduling NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS APP C.20 and adding hours. Larry suggested we start by looking at the FTE's by academic disciplines. What facilities do we need right away? Doug Schroeder asked Larry to share how he would work with the group, and what he would expect of us to bring back to the group. Larry will meet with each committee member individually to discuss space needs. Larry will challenge us to explain why we need or do not need the space and why we project what we do for the area in discussion, keeping in mind the campus as a whole. Support functions will then be looked at. Larry will put together a plan for discussion. The Committee will then meet to discuss the plan priorities. Doug Schroeder asked the Committee for comments and reactions. A question regarding the capital campaign and time frame was raised. It was Mr. Schroeder's belief that Dr. Cureton would like to see the kick-off in 2004 and work it in parallel with the LRSP. Is there an interim plan if the College keeps growing at this pace and our CMP is not in place? Doug Schroeder addressed that some short-term options have been considered including renting space off campus or the use of temporary classroom units. However, student -dining space will become an increasingly difficult problem to overcome in the short run. The question arose again as to whether 2400 would fit on this campus. Yes, with qualifications. The campus now can only hold 1600; we are past capacity now and need to do something. There was a concern mentioned of trying to work on a moving target. Are we ever going to arrive at the place where we have met the building need? Doug Schroeder commented that a new leader is usually brought in to help grow the organization not to maintain it. It is the responsibility of the President to work with the Trustees to establish the overall and long-term growth goals for the organization. Larry Page mentioned that the Committee would need to test any changes against the mission of the College. Does the city of Roseville and Arden Hills know where we are headed? Yes, Doug Schroeder and Larry Page have met with city officials and will have further meetings. Comment was made regarding how educating is changing; that in 10 years we may not educate like we do now. There may be more online classes and technology will continue to bring about significant changes in the education process. Larry Page mentioned to look at student profile. A question was raised regarding a graduate school and what total number of students would we be looking at including Alternative Education NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS APP C.21 APPENDIX, C enrollments? Doug Schroeder shared that a total number of 4000 students has been discussed as part of the LRSP. Doug Schroeder asked Ruth Ball to work with Larry Page to schedule appointments with the Committee members over the next couple of weeks. The Committee will meet as a whole the beginning of July once Larry Page has assembled the data together. Look at this as a framework for development with flexibility. Look at things now to 10 years and then 25 to 75 years and how capital funding will play a part. Doug shared the "good" problem that Notre Dame has (people standing in line to pay for campus buildings) and what a good problem to pray for that NWC would have. Barb Lindman closed in prayer. Meeting adjourned 2:20 pm. 10 July 2003 A meeting of the Campus Master Plan Committee of Northwest- ern College was convened on Tuesday, May 27, 2003 at 1:10 p.m. in the Youderian Lounge. Members Present: Doug Schroeder Matt Hill Asa Ferguson Hal Miller Jane Goedeke Doug Huffman Tim Tomlinson Mark Baden Jerry Bielby (for Dan Crane) Cheryl Seiffert John Delich Randy Riesberg Steve Morrow Michael Ek Ruth Ball Guest Present: Mr. Larry Page, Partners & Sirny Members Absent: Monica Groves Barb Lindman Dale Solberg Dr. Miller called the meeting to order and Jane Goedeke opened in prayer. Doug Schroeder shared a few opening comments and turned the meeting over to Larry Page. Larry thanked the Committee for working with him the past couple of weeks. He mentioned how pleasing it was to see how well people worked together for the good of NWC and not just for their own area needs. Larry shared an aerial view of the campus to show how tight the campus is along with a graph NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS APP C.22 APPENDIX 0 C that shows we are limited on space. Larry also shared a map of the current facilities and utility services on campus and a site constraints map which shows the set back from the lake. According to the DNR., the set back is required to be 75 feet. The powerhouse is on that set back currently. The map showed city set backs as well. For the NWC campus there are no currently established or agreed zoning standards other than for those that exist for residential housing, so there will need to be additional discussion with the city regarding zoning restrictions. We will need to watch the usage and campus activity along the property line to the east due to residential sensitivity. We will also need to have more holding ponds on campus as the ordinance has changed since the last building projects. Discussion took place on moving one of the current ponds beyond Maranatha to place a building there. There are some elevation issues, which would be a future discussion that would need to include an engineer. The right of way area will need to be looked at as well. Larry made his presentation, sharing the proposed plan vs. the existing. (See attachments) The only open areas to consider currently are some building areas by the tennis court and by the old drive in to campus. Larry had to consider utility feeds, set backs, aesthetics, and parking, in addition to the growth factor. A mall concept with consideration for changing the road and parking was shared, along with possible sites for student residence halls. An athletic field house was discussed, however more time and attention will need to be spent on Athletics to evaluate their needs. Larry will be following up with Matt Hill regarding their needs. Discussion took place regarding the general use of the Mall, the parking structure, new buildings vs. remodeling, residence halls, events and athletics. The Committee in general was in favor of the Mall concept and thought that it would be very appealing. The building of a dorm that was previously approved by the city has expired and NWC will need to reapproach the city for that structure. The scale of the housing can be kept minimized compared to an academic building. Discussion as to the zoning of NWC and rezoning the campus as one part academic and one residential or institutional zoning took place. The Committee was encouraged to share the proposal in general with their co-workers, however they were cautioned to keep the information shared in this meeting confidential and that it is not to be shared with those outside of the campus community. We do not want to jeopardize any work NWC will need to do with the cities of Arden Hills and Roseville. Handicap accessibility needs were discussed. Further evaluation as to what to do with the mechanical facilities of the campus will need to be done. Should each building be free standing as some buildings are or a central place for the whole NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS APP C.23 APPENDIX C campus. It will be important for the buildings to be attractive however economical. There are several items that require further evaluation. Dr. Miller addressed the target number for our growth. Mr. Schroeder addressed the growth number vs. the city of Roseville and Arden Hills. Discussion took place regarding South Campus and student housing in Snelling Terrace and the need for Larry to do additional work on this area. The Committee discussed the parking proposed. Is it possible to put in some parking behind Maranatha instead of where the tennis courts are? What about parking in both locations? Larry will evaluate the possibilities. The use of the island property was mentioned and the need to see about incorporating that into the plan. Can we make it a park? Jerry Bielby discussed the buckthorn project and how we can incorporate the island by making it a small arboretum; make it attractive so people will use it. Dr. Miller suggests that we add the island into the final Master Plan. Larry Page will evaluate the possibilities for use of the island property. The next step for the Committee will be to take the proposed proposal to your co-workers and share their ideas and thoughts when we meet again. Larry will continue to work on the evaluation of some of the areas mentioned along with reworking the proposal based on a few suggestions given. The next meeting is scheduled for August 7 at 9 a.m. Mr. Schroeder closed in prayer. Meeting adjourned 11:25 28 August 2003 A meeting of the Campus Master Plan Committee of Northwest- ern College was convened on Thursday, August 28, 2003 at 9:00 a.m. in the Youderian Lounge. Members Present: Doug Schroeder Asa Ferguson Jane Goedeke Tim Tomlinson Matt Hill Hal Miller Doug Huffman Mark Baden Members Absent: John Delich Dan Crane Randy Riesberg NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS APP C.24 APPENDIX E C Dale Solberg Monica Groves Steve Morrow Ruth Ball Cheryl Seiffert Barb. Lindman Michael Ek Guest Present: Mr. Larry Page, Partners & Sirny Doug Schroeder called the meeting to order and opened in prayer. Doug mentioned that Larry Page had made a presentation to the President's cabinet this week and it was well received. Hal Miller mentioned that the Campus Master Plan will be shared with the Board of Trustees at the December meeting. August 7, 2003 minutes were reviewed and approved. Larry Page presented the new proposed plan that encompassed the recommendations from precious Campus Master Plan meet- ings. This was the proposed plan that was presented to the President's Cabinet. Larry noted the changes, which included the drive by the field house and the south part of the campus. A question proposed dealing with a road that at one time went along the property line to the west. This road is no longer there or in use.. There was discussion about the intersection by the ball field and the possibility of moving it slightly to give more space. There was a brief discussion regarding the scene shop and where it was shown on the plan and where it would be relocated in the future. The original entrance gate will be maintained as a symbolic entrance. Larry shared briefly about the walk bridge and design that would go over Snelling. This. would require discussion and planning with the city of Roseville. There are also ADA regulations that impact this subject. Doug Schroeder mentioned the added plan of the decking of the Riley Gym. This is in current discussion at the Cabinet level. This would be two levels with approximately an additional 14,000 of finished space. There is most likely asbestos issues that will need to be addressed. The goal would be as we deck the Riley Gym that we raise the money for the field house and other athletic field needs. The need for an elevator in Riley was discussed. Larry Page mentioned, once you do an area of a building you need to bring up to code the area surrounding it. Discussion took place regarding continued growth and how it will be addressed when things get tight as we go through the process. A transition plan needs to be established for Biology, Music; some of the specialty academics. Discussion of class schedules took place and the need to redesign the schedule to fit the needs. Additionally, there will be HVAC/utility issues NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS APP C.25 APPENDIX E C going forward, as well. When the Community Life Center is built on the Mall area, the tunnel between Riley and Naz would be cut in half. These changes would encompass the HVAC changes. A lengthy discussion took place regarding the current tunnels on campus and do we have a need for additional tunnels in some areas? How much do the students really use the tunnels? Larry noted that tunnels are very costly to do. Asa mentioned the concern we currently have with the tunnels involving mold and water issues. Larry mentioned the mold issue and how that is an increasing possibility of lawsuits. The committee had mixed feelings on the tunnels around the Mall area. Hal Miller recommend if anything, a tunnel from the dorm end to the academic end of campus. Hal recommended that during the final plan design a decision be made about the pathways between the buildings and that we should stay consistent in our look. It is imperative to use the current below ground areas as to help keep the campus from looking crowded. Hal recommended that we list the pros and cons of the tunnels in our report. Doug Schroeder mentioned the garage for the vans in the Riley building. Doug would expect those garages to be able to be remodeled sometime in the future and the vans moved elsewhere. Utility issues were discussed. They should be looked at when we get to that point in the plan. Larry recommended that we look at keeping the image of the College as a market point and invest our money there instead. Larry Page's closing comment regarding the proposed plan is to keep in mind the mission of the college. The committee reviewed the Preliminary Recommendation Draft report for the items that were added from the last CMP meeting: Item #7, 10 C, 11E, 11F, 12F, 20, 22, 27, 32, 33, 34, 41, 43, 52, 53, and 55. Changes made or additional additions to the Preliminary Recommendation Draft Report: Confirm the property lines and the acreage. Historical Preservation..... the city process would involve zoning; Institutional zone vs. the PUD. The annex issue will need to be addressed. This would also be an added recommendation. 12I State building codes and ADA codes are slightly different dealing with handicap. Environmental buildings was explained by Larry; certification process. Recommend that we consider these when planning. NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS APP C.26 APPENDIX 12E add telecom and other systems 18 use the word "real estate" instead 19 add the word "Alternative" 28 Correct Maranatha # to be 1500 capacity. Chapel, Marantha music wing to be an over flow for chapel or a recital hall. Recommend maybe sound proofing the carousels 35 add Horizontal wiring 42 "planned" 54 is similar to #28 - combine 56 add deferred maintenance plan 57 assets and sister colleges 64 "college," "committed," remove "of the" Larry requested to discuss Item 14, the charge back system. Larry explained the system is referring more about a rental space type charge back. Hal recommended using the word allocation; Develop a system for allocating space assets. Next step for Larry will be to sit down and do a cost analyze on the plan. Motion was made to accept the proposed plan and preliminary recommendation Motion seconded. Hal Miller thanked Larry for his services to Northwestern College. Larry commented again on what a pleasure it was to work with us. Monica Groves closed in prayer. Committee adjourned Meeting adjourned END OF MEETING MINUTES NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS APP C.27 APPENDIX E D CAMPUS STUDIES Insert List of Non -Facilities related Campus Studies (primarily aca- demic) • Self Study(date?) Available where? • etc. Available where e-0 ave .1 -0 o� 1 r°`il&ells,o°(` cveCW �o�a zoyeri b° 80 tN a� ca�do4 �as4 e,4s �a�e As��`a►�' gad ,�aY�' s° ti` ,mai z11y�a ele, e I xe L��1es��i°mss s 1Q�1 e�e1`J s 1 evq0 �e s cX: s� to S�o�1 rre4` 11 � AZ91 i�t1~e to �et ase °ilc Ala'Vese.aid V3 '4a�allab� NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS APP DA APPENDIX E D NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS APP D.2 APPENDIX E E FACILITIES DATA & RESOURCES Insert List of Facilities related Studies such as • Deferred Maintenance Plan (date?) • 5 Year Plan (date? • Space Utilization Study (2001) • Maintenance Schedules • Site Survey (including utilities) (date?) • Mech/Elec Systems studies • etc. 1a�el�e�`5 �ra� o�1ael� eel oo��eC 1 x'140 fi �o �� al�tie e a � la��e. 0 afiafi vefivob o do evo �e , So'��`�a ab1e� s� �11� efi �1es� e a Aa e�` �" o -el �ele� les a e� all s s l�See�l able o`�1�11s� re�lo� 15 a�a ala S �a e o4 4 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS APP E.1 APPENDIX E E NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS APP E.2 Note: A larger 11 x 17 version of this plan is inserted at the end of the Master Plan. PROPOSED Development Framework Art Building& Sculpture Terrace Remodel Powerhouse Demolish '_+heds 31,6(1) SF� hivac Addition (Art) Pa rkin9 U L 12V Stalls f Maintenance LLn Community Life Center j hligil General Purpose/ Classrooms __ = 80, lk:tl SF j 3 Levels Library Addition Academic General j Science 48, (AV, GSF j 3Levels Parkine 2 Levels (M Fade +t structured] cvO) 4901- Stal Is ;ExISTI N,G Island Chapel and N'a to re Resource Nazareth Hall Rrlcy I=[all - - - 49,695 GSC Reck.G,ym add 11,9()i9ASF Existing Tennis Courts- Neu; ourtsNeer Dornutonr ` . 55T -Beds j 3 Le eels — hirn, erRormitory' 88 Beds r� -r �--r-F– Enti ckn Lcniur Knutson j Hartill 680 B cads New Fieldhouse 160'-x 30(l 4 Courts j Indoor track Locker Room!Offices C'nn��sWons Athletic Fields Reconfigured - South Terrace Dorm ...r; 73 Bcds Visitor j Alumni Center ! KTIS Radio s to SF th d 4 o: � �' •;�, )+14)hnson A,icdra Center 42,665 _qF Demolish a-sigL7cvm FutureBuilding j Addition to KTIS Alt Fd, Admin, Offices, Classrooms SF 1b Dormitory. L ! , MO Snel9ing 51 Pedestrian NeLr Dormitory• i94(9 Snellin g Infill 96 Beds/ 3 -Levels LL Parking Campus baster Plan Scope 12(), �-a 0 GSP a o Totino Tine Arts Center e T_ -- ---- 8,715 C5F Btrnsten ResourcL Center ?88, 883 G 5 Rrlcy I=[all - - - 49,695 GSC Reck.G,ym add 11,9()i9ASF Existing Tennis Courts- Neu; ourtsNeer Dornutonr ` . 55T -Beds j 3 Le eels — hirn, erRormitory' 88 Beds r� -r �--r-F– Enti ckn Lcniur Knutson j Hartill 680 B cads New Fieldhouse 160'-x 30(l 4 Courts j Indoor track Locker Room!Offices C'nn��sWons Athletic Fields Reconfigured - South Terrace Dorm ...r; 73 Bcds Visitor j Alumni Center ! KTIS Radio s to SF th d 4 o: � �' •;�, )+14)hnson A,icdra Center 42,665 _qF Demolish a-sigL7cvm FutureBuilding j Addition to KTIS Alt Fd, Admin, Offices, Classrooms SF 1b Dormitory. L ! , MO Snel9ing 51 Pedestrian NeLr Dormitory• i94(9 Snellin g Infill 96 Beds/ 3 -Levels LL Parking Campus baster Plan Scope NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 6.2 T_ Rormior}.. I17 II X914-349 Snelling o $6Beds Dormitory 2906 Snelling `13Beds i NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 6.2 Northwestern College Master Plan Northwestern College Roseville and Arden Hills, Minnesota Stormwater Management Study TKDA ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS Submitted: November 15, 2006 Revised: January 18, 2007 Revised: August 27, 2007 Project No. 13529.000 444 Cedar Street, Suite 1500 Saint Paul, MN 55101-2140 (651)292-4400 (651)292-0083 Fax www.tkda.com NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE MASTER PLAN STORMWATER MANAGEMENT STUDY TKDA PROJECT NO. 13529.000 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO. SECTION I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY....................................................................................1 SECTIONII. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................2 SECTION III. HYDROLOGIC AND RESOURCE INVENTORY................................................4 SECTION IV. PROBLEM ASSESSMENT.................................................................................6 SECTIONV. REGULATIONS..................................................................................................9 A. Current RCWD Stormwater Rules..............................................................9 B. Proposed RCWD Stormwater Rules.........................................................10 C. RCWD Wetland Rules..............................................................................11 D. County Rules............................................................................................12 E. State Rules...............................................................................................12 F. Municipal Rules........................................................................................12 SECTION VI. CONCEPTUAL PLAN FOR SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT ..................... 13 A. Wet Detention Ponds................................................................................13 B. Pollution Prevention..................................................................................14 C. Pervious pavements.................................................................................14 D. Infiltration..................................................................................................14 E. Filters and Sumps.....................................................................................14 SECTION VII. GOALS AND POLICIES...................................................................................20 A. Water Quantity.........................................................................................20 B. Water Quality............................................................................................20 C. Natural Resources....................................................................................20 D. Wetlands..................................................................................................21 E. Erosion Control.........................................................................................21 F. Public Participation, Information and Education........................................21 G. Monitoring................................................................................................21 H. Maintenance and Inspection.....................................................................22 I. Finance....................................................................................................22 Northwestern College Master Plan i 13529.000 Stormwater Management Study PAGE NO. SECTIONVIII. IMPLEMENTATION..........................................................................................22 A. Public Education and Outreach................................................................22 B. Public Participation/Involvement...............................................................22 C. Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination................................................23 D. Construction Site Runoff Control..............................................................23 E. Post -Construction Runoff Control.............................................................23 F. Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping................................................23 APPENDIX PAGES WetlandDelineations..................................................................................................................2 Cityof Roseville Regulations......................................................................................................6 Rice Creek Watershed District Regulations................................................................................5 NPDES Construction Regulations.............................................................................................18 Best Management Practices.......................................................................................................8 FIGURES PAGE NO. Figure No. 1: Existing Drainage Features...................................................................................3 Figure No. 2: Lake Johanna Water Level Reading......................................................................5 Figure No. 3: Lake Johanna Water Quality Data.........................................................................5 Figure No. 4: Campus Master Plan.............................................................................................8 Figure No. 5: Proposed BMPs Map North Half of Campus........................................................16 Figure No. 5A: Proposed BMPs Map North Half of Campus Revised........................................17 Figure No. 6: Proposed BMPs Map South Half of Campus......................................................18 Figure No. 6A: Proposed BMPs Map North Half of Campus.....................................................19 Northwestern College Master Plan 13529.000 Stormwater Management Study NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE MASTER PLAN STORMWATER MANAGEMENT STUDY I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Nazareth Hall Preparatory Seminary opened in September 1923 as a four-year high school and two-year junior college for candidates for diocesan priesthood. Its 87 -acres were purchased from the Archdiocese of Saint Paul/Minneapolis by Northwestern College in 1970. Today, the College's natural environment is largely a function of its two lakes, Johanna and Little Johanna, which occupy a large part of the total land area of the campus. Both lakes are identified as impaired on Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's March 31, 2004, proposed Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) list. Lake Johanna is classified as eutrophic and exhibits water levels from a high of 881.27 feet on July 3, 1978, to 870.35 feet on July 21, 1926, or a range of 10.92 feet, and its Ordinary High Water level is 878 feet. Little Lake Johanna has very little published information. This Plan presents a campus -wide Stormwater Management strategy that identifies Best Management Practices that can be implemented to facilitate the campus redevelopment. The overall goal is to cooperate with appropriate agencies including the Cities of Roseville and Arden Hills, Rice Creek Watershed District and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to improve the quality of both of the campus lakes. Achievement of these goals will deliver good quality stormwater runoff from the campus to lakes and wetlands at acceptable rates and volumes, while reducing pollutant and sediment loadings and stream bed/stream bank erosion and water quality degradation. Stormwater quality and quantity Best Management Practices (BMPs) that seem particularly appropriate for the campus include: wet detention ponds; pollution prevention such as material storage control, turf management, parking lot cleaning; pervious pavements to reduce the amount of runoff; infiltration practices and filter devices which primarily trap solids that have pollutants attached to them. In some respects, the implementation of the Plan described in this document will resemble a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program requires of many Cities including Roseville and Arden Hills. Such a plan has six elements: Northwestern College Master Plan 1 13529.000 Stormwater Management Study Public Education and Outreach ® Public Participation/Involvement Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination • Construction Site Runoff Control Post -Construction Runoff Control ® Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping II. INTRODUCTION Nazareth Hall Preparatory Seminary opened in September 1923 as a four-year high school and two-year junior college for candidates for diocesan priesthood. Its 87 -acres were purchased from the Archdiocese of Saint Paul/Minneapolis by Northwestern College in 1970. Moyer Hall was built as an on -campus residence hall in 1973. In 1980, the Hartill- Knutson residences and Robertson Student Center was completed to house all residential students on campus. In 1982, the Totino Fine Arts Center was completed. In 1992, the campus library was moved into the new Berntsen Resource Center. In 1996, the Ericksen Center was completed. Today, the Northwestern College campus retains its rural charm within the context of its core educational mission. It has a sense of community because most of the student population is located on or near the campus. The College's natural environment (Figure No. 1) is largely a function of its two lakes, Johanna and Little Johanna, which occupy a large part of the total land area of the campus. Lakes Johanna and Little Johanna generally fall into two Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) categories; Natural Environmental and Recreational. Northwestern College Master Plan 2 13529.000 Stormwater Management Study lNORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUukgnNG USSAM�AeSTER PLAN i1J J�0 WINEEKS•MMECTS• PLANRM-"---'�� III. HYDROLOGIC AND RESOURCE INVENTORY The campus soil conditions are described as sandy lake sediment in the Geologic Atlas for Ramsey County, which was prepared by the Minnesota Geological Survey in 1992. This would include fine -to -medium sand and silt and clay. These are probably former lake deposits that may have been partially confined by stagnant ice. The campus forms a peninsula on northerly and westerly sides into Lake Johanna in Arden Hills and on its westerly side into Little Lake Johanna in Roseville. Figure No. 1 shows the existing campus watersheds. Lake Johanna (DNR Lake ID number 62-0078 and hydrologic unit code 7010206) is located in Arden Hills and has an area of 213 acres and maximum depth of 43 feet. Its dominant bottom substrate is sand and gravel, and muck with abundant plant growth to a maximum depth of 10 feet. Bluegills are the most abundant species sampled in Lake Johanna. The average length captured during the survey was 5.53 inches. Less than 1 % of the catch exceeded 7 inches. Pumpkinseed and hybrid sunfish were also sampled in high abundance for this type of lake. Black crappies were not as abundant as previous years. The population of this species has been variable. The average length sampled was slightly larger than 7 inches. Walleye were sampled in average numbers for this type of lake. Half the walleyes caught were 20 inches and longer. Northern pike were abundant when compared to historical levels on this lake. The average size caught was 26.62 inches and 4.37 pounds. Over 70% of the pike sampled exceeded 25 inches. Yellow perch were found to be abundant but small. Two thousand six hundred and seventy seven (2,677) Lake level records for Lake Johanna have been record since January 5, 1924, to the present (Figure No. 2). The highest and lowest recorded water levels were: 881.27 feet on July 3, 1978, and 870.35 feet on July 21, 1926, respectively, which is a range of 10.92 feet. The most recent lake level reading was 878.51 on June 30, 2006. The MDNR has established an Ordinary High Water (OHW) level of 878 feet which means that any work below that level would require a permit from the MDNR. Northwestern College Master Plan 4 13529.000 Stormwater Management Study — 878.25 L 877.5 (I! W 876.75 _ 76 FIGURE NO. 2: LAKE JOHANNA WATER LEVEL READING Johanna - 62$07$$$ 1998 2000 2002 2004 200, The Lake is classified as Eutrophic based on transparency, Chlorophyll, and Total Phosphorus measurements as presented in Figure No. 3. FIGURE NO. 3: LAKE JOHANNA WATER QUALITY DATA Cklgutroplir Mesotrophic Eadvplrk Hyperrr-uWVir rel oa 1u Trophic State Index I ns C3 Transpa►ravy (m) I ]I Chlorophyll -a (P Fb ) Tula] Phosphorus (ppb) T LO iS 21, Northwestern College Master Plan 5 13529.000 Stormwater Management Study Little Lake Johanna (DNR Lake ID number 62-0078 and hydrologic unit code 7010206) is located in Roseville and Arden Hills. This lake has an area of 18 acres and maximum depth of 28 feet. The dominate bottom substrate is not known nor is the abundance of aquatic plants or water quality. Based on the Gillnet catch only, Carp, Black Bullhead, and Black Crappies were found at above local median. Brown Bullhead and Northern Pike were sampled at below local median levels. Yellow Bullhead, Largemouth Bass, Green Sunfish, Pumpkinseed, Bluegill and hybrid Sunfish are know to inhabit the lake based on 1979 test netting. The only recorded water level on Little Lake Johanna is 878.28 feet on August 5, 1976. IV. PROBLEM ASSESS Current data suggests that Lakes Little Johanna and Johanna have water quality issues. Both are included in the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's (MPCAs) March 31, 2004, proposed Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) list. The listing for Little Lake Johanna was due to a stress caused by excess nutrients affecting its use for aquatic recreation. The listing for Lake Johanna was for impacts due to mercury affecting its use for fish consumption. The Lake Johanna listing is a mainly regional expression, so the initial approach will be to complete regional or state-wide mercury TMDL reports. This approach could change based on basin planning activities. U.S. EPA Region 5 understands there must be a federal responsibility for the national and international air -borne components of mercury. Both lakes are also included on the MPCA 2006 Impaired Waters List. This Surface Water Management Plan (SWMP) presents a vision of high quality natural and water resources for the College as its Master Plan (Figure No. 4) is implemented. The SWMP's overall goal is to cooperate with the Cities of Roseville and Arden Hills to improve the quality of both of the campus lakes. Achievement of these goals will deliver good quality stormwater runoff from the campus to lakes and wetlands at acceptable rates and volumes, while reducing pollutant and sediment loadings and stream bed/stream bank erosion and water quality degradation. The success of attaining these goals will be measured by: A. Improving the lake grades for Johanna and Little Johanna in cooperation with the RCWD and the Cities of Roseville and Arden Hills. Northwestern College Master Plan 6 13529.000 Stormwater Management Study B. Maintaining the existing runoff characteristics of peak flow and volume from the campus's sub watersheds in accordance with rules promulgated by NPDES, the Cities of Arden Hills and Roseville, and the Rice Creek Watershed District. C. Effective implementation of the College's policies with regard to BMPs and the NPDES measurable goals in the areas of Public Education and Outreach, Public Participation/Involvement, Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination, Construction Site Runoff Control, Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping and Post Construction Runoff Control. There follows Figure 4 which shows proposed improvements that are the subject of this PUD as it was begun. Since the process began, a number of changes and refinements have occurred. There follows Exhibit B as taken from the PUD Report dated August, 2007, entitled "Anticipated General Site Development and Phasing Plan." This plan represents the most current version of the Campus Plan. Key changes in this plan include: A. Realignment of the road in the northeastern corner of the campus. B. Design of the parking ramp with access to other parking and two-way streets to allow egress from the parking ramp to Lincoln Drive. C. Deletion of the maintenance facility/parking ramp on the northwest corner of the plan. D. Movement of the proposed dormitory from the east side of the Campus to a more central location. E. Movement of the field house to the southwest side of the campus and realignment of the Athletic fields. Northwestern College Master Plan 7 13529.000 Stormwater Management Study a O U 4A Z a J a W H LA a D Ca G a u W W J O u Z W W O Z AV I LLQj N aT > \ V1 o N u o fl \ 4J O V) C \ O V w° �, LL v IA _0G! ra m V -.9 Y v N i O c O O v v rev \ L Q) y V L i a0+ v1 V O m O O +' to + \ 3 R C > L N p 00l a2 N 6 Q +�Li- Y v Ln Q N $ C C V —^ > m ai v N °' i v c O p v Q) 'ate Q> •c L a) O y }, p p p 00 V) CO W C O m = v J O +=' m N °1 L Ul r^ V \ m 7 70 v N Q L � N = C ++ C L y V C p) — s+ d •� X Y. J N > aJ O O N N vi O O Z = = I i i = i N C i m NJ �_ O = 'a LL `^ u- to C J = p) 1 E O 41 7 C C O R t Vl L LL LL LL C LL 7 O V O V LL V) N C LL •= L L ut >+ •= L Q I N V LL p LL r��p N7 '-' �. O Q. 'a U C LL E Q to C r0 N N = 1 L ,� O ii m d (n V O l7 QJ % = C) y �% C H N t /� r C O r C C V) L li L m , n Q 7 o .� o a GI C M O O o ai V LL X +J C X L Ln m I� O �n = m 00 u� >� m => c L U O 4J N N Y Ln H v ++ m t o �, a) O Ln -n kp in E O ^� E in E �p C o m O O 4J O:E3 p v :� .0 O v O N o O N L R 0 d 'a O m v -, = O Ln u IM 14 O r I� i 00 4/ � C O CO u W O 7 Co �p 00 C N C O O O mrV 3 kq E N p O 1= O O 1Q +-' L O O O V `� �n �' O W Z 1p- �o CO ON0 H v 000 W M Y �o V1 n O N O N D N Q N d D ii Q Q a NO V t U J Q V) d Z Ln Z i Q Ln a 0© © 0© 0 0 0 0 8 8® 8 8 8 B 8 8 8 8 ®®® 8® 8 8 AV I V. REGULATIONS This Plan recognizes the numerous entities involved in water resources management and environmental protection. It avoids duplicating efforts of others by assuring continuity between Northwestern College and the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD), Ramsey County, the Metropolitan Council (METCO), State of Minnesota Agencies such as the Department of Natural Resources (MDNR), the Department of Health (MDH) and the Board of Soil and Water Resources (BWSR), plus Federal Agencies, most notably the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Within this context, this Plan meets the provisions of the Federal Clean Water Act and Minnesota Statutes 473, 879, and 103B.235. It also conforms to Minnesota Rules 8410 and RCWD Rules. The State of Minnesota adopted the Minnesota Watershed District Act in 1955. This Act, now codified in Minnesota Statues 103D (formerly Chapter 112), provides for establishment of watershed districts "to conserve the natural resources of the state by land use planning, flood control, and other conservation projects using sound scientific principles for the protection of the public health and welfare and provident use of the natural resources." The RCWD is a special purpose unit of local government created to carry out watershed management. The Minnesota Water Resources Board (MWRB) established the District in 1972, under the authority of Minnesota Statutes 103D. The original RCWD plan for water management was prepared in 1974. A "second generation" plan was completed in 1990, in compliance with the Metropolitan Surface Water Management Act (Minnesota Statutes 103B). That plan has been updated in 1994, 1997, and 2000. The RCWD mission statement is "Prevent flooding and enhance water quality in harmony with development for the common good". The District's objectives include: (A) Minimize public expenditure to control runoff, (B) Improve water quality, (C) Prevent flooding and erosion, (D) Promote groundwater recharge, (E) Protect and enhance fish and wildlife habitat and recreation and (F) Provide for the transition of water management to local units of government. A. CURRENT RCWD STORMWATER RULES The current RCWD permit rules that are relevant to the campus are discussed below and full text is included in the Appendix. Northwestern College Master Plan 9 13529.000 Stormwater Management Study 1. Detention basins must be designed to provide an outlet structure to control the 1 -year or 2 -year, and 100 -year frequency events to pre -project peak runoff sites. An emergency overflow spillway must be identified that provides for the safe conveyance of larger flows. 2. Permanent sedimentation and water quality ponds are required and must be designed to provide water quality features consistent with the National Urban Runoff Program (NURP criteria) and District wet pond criteria. This includes: a) A permanent wet pool with dead storage of at least equal to the runoff from a 2.5 rainfall over the area tributary to the pond, b) An outlet structure capable of preventing migration of floating debris and oils for at least the one-year storm; and, c) Access for future maintenance. 3. All new residential, commercial, industrial and other habitable or non -habitable structures must be constructed so that the lowest floor elevations are a minimum of two feet above the critical event 100 -year high water elevation and are one - foot above the overflow elevation of nearby waterbodies. 4. Development resulting in the creation of impervious surfaces must explicitly address the use of Best Management Practices (BMPs) to: a) Limit the loss of pervious area; and, b) Infiltrate runoff which does occur from impervious areas to the extent feasible. 5. Incorporate practices into the design which are capable of infiltrating the impervious surface runoff from the Minneapolis -St. Paul median storm (0.34 inches) in 72 hours. B. PROPOSED RCWD STORMWATER RULES RCWD is proposing new rules that would modify the existing rules discussed above. These proposed rules would apply to three types of project types: Northwestern College Master Plan 10 13529.000 Stormwater Management Study 1. New development projects 2. Redevelopment projects 3. Linear Projects such streets, utility and independent trail projects In its new rules, RCWD wants to employ BMPs based on the runoff volume generated (under proposed conditions) from the 2 -year (2.8 inch storm event) that "mimics the natural hydrology of a watershed". This would be the standard for "new development" projects. RCWD wants another very important change in the recognized "existing condition" baseline of the watersheds for "redevelopment projects". They want to eliminate this baseline and replace it with a "pre -development baseline". A "minimum standard" for a "redevelopment project" would be treatment at 70% of the "new development" treatment goals for the entire watershed. For street projects, the RCWD currently requires that runoff from rainfalls of 0.34 inches or less be captured and infiltrated. RCWD intends to keep this standard for "greater than 1 acre new impervious" projects along with rate control for the 1 -year and 100 -year storm events. C. RCWD WETLAND RULES The Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) of 1991 requires the mitigation of wetland impacts. It gives the RCWD administrative and enforcement powers over wetlands located in Northwestern College. RCWD has been authorized by the Minnesota State Legislature to act as the local government unit responsible for administering the Wetland Conservation Act. RCWD does not have a local wetland -banking program and relies on the state program for mitigation purposes. It uses methods and procedures outlined in the WCA to determine replacement of wetland values in mitigation proposals. Northwestern College Master Plan 11 13529.000 Stormwater Management Study D. COUNTY RULES Ramsey County (Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) has developed a Ground Water Quality Protection Plan that provides guidance for preventing groundwater contamination for local governments, dated May 1996. E. STATE RULES The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) has authority over the state's protected waters, which includes Johanna and Little Johanna because they have areas greater than 2.5 acres in both Roseville and Arden Hills, which are incorporated areas of the state. This authority is implemented by permitting which includes aquatic plant control, lake levels, streambank modifications and shoreland management (which MDNR delegated to the Cities of Roseville and Arden Hills). F. MUNICIPAL RULES The Cities of Arden Hills and Roseville are also very interested and involved with Northwestern College. While the City of Arden Hills defers to the RCWD standards for developments with respect to stormwater management, the City of Roseville has standards with respect to stormwater management including: 1. Not exceeding 25% impervious cover of a site area in a shoreland or wetland overlay district unless stormwater is conveyed to an approved on-site or regional stormwater ponding /retention facility prior to discharge. 2. Review for compliance with the City Stormwater Plan, NURP standards, MPCA Urban BMPs and other agency concerns 3. All Commercial, Industrial and Residential Developments greater than five acres will: a) Remove a minimum of ninety percent of total suspended solids resulting from the runoff from a one inch rainfall event; and, Northwestern College Master Plan 12 13529.000 Stormwater Management Study b) Provide for settling chambers, sumps, dry ponds or other devices to provide filtering and settling of fine sands prior to discharge to city stormwater systems. 4. All private stormwater systems shall be maintained to operate as originally designed. VI. CONCEPTUAL PLAN FOR SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT The Northwestern Campus is divided into two distinct areas which can viewed as the Arden Hills development jurisdiction area (north half of the Campus) and Roseville development jurisdiction area (South half of the Campus). As discussed above, both halves of the Campus will require RCWD and NPDES permits for development permits and the southern half of the Campus will also need to comply with the City of Roseville rules. Within this context, the College will also need to be mindful of the fact that all of these rules are evolving from using existing conditions as the base watershed condition to a pre -settlement condition as the base watershed condition. Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) (Figures 5 and 6 and Table 1) that seem particularly appropriate for the Campus include: A. WET DETENTION PONDS This is the classic Stormwater Treatment BMP, commonly referred to as the 'Walker Pond" in Minnesota. Such a pond captures and retains runoff during storm events which controls both stormwater quantity and quality. The pond's natural physical, biological, and chemical processes then work to remove pollutants. Sedimentation processes remove particulates and organic matter, while dissolved nutrients are removed through biological uptake. Several such ponds currently exist on Campus near the Totino Fine Arts Center in the North (Arden Hills) area of the Campus and near the Erickson Center and the Hartill-Knutson Residences and Robertson Student Center. Northwestern College Master Plan 13 13529.000 Stormwater Management Study B. POLLUTION PREVENTION This includes construction sediment control, material storage control, turf management, parking lot cleaning and street sweeping, litter control, deicing management, vehicle maintenance, storm sewer maintenance, and material storage covers. C. PERVIOUS PAVEMENTS Pervious pavements reduce the amount of runoff by allowing water to pass through surfaces that would otherwise be impervious. This can be accomplished by using products such as "Netlawn" to reinforce turf areas so they are suitable for some parking practices. Other pervious pavements include porous pavers or pervious asphalt. D. INFILTRATION RCWD strongly encourages using Infiltration as a BMP. Due to its sandy soils, the Campus is well suited for the use of this BMP. Using such practices would also be particularly useful in meeting the City of Roseville's requirement to capture the runoff from a one inch rainfall for water quality control. The Campus has implemented this BMP in one parking area on its northeast side as shown in Figure 5. Potential infiltration practices include rain gardens, depressed parking lot islands, swales, sand filters, infiltration basins or trenches, and underground systems. E. FILTERS AND SUMPS Filters and sumps could also be employed in catch basins to add to the ability to capture pollutions contained in runoff. This BMP could be employed in any catch basin on the Campus and would be most effective in treating catch basin flows that are not treated by other BMPs. Northwestern College Master Plan 14 13529.000 Stormwater Management Study Table No. 1 BMP Selection by Watershed There follows additions (Figure 5a and Exhibit D) that show revised BMPS Maps based on changes in the campus master plan discussed earlier in this report. The main difference is in reconfiguring subwatersheds to account for refinements and changes in the Comprehensive Plan. Northwestern College Master Plan 15 13529.000 Stormwater Management Study N Q E CO +' C d ( 7 N L O a m y C ° > d W ` a LL c c "O a a 7 c 0 .N m Area 0 'r. O 5r t Watershed acres Proposed Structures a L a Y 1 3.5 X X X X X 5.7 Campus Green/Community Life Center/Road X X X X 2 3 4.6 Music AddJP@FkiRq raRq Science Bld /Road X X 4 3.4 Community Life Center/Road X X X 5 2.1 X X X 6 2.7 Parking Ramp X X 7 6.4 Parkin Ramp/DormitoryRamp/Dormitory X X X 8 3.9 Road X X X 9 2.1 X X '10 9.7 Field House X X X 11 5.1 Field House X X 12 0.3 Alumni Center X There follows additions (Figure 5a and Exhibit D) that show revised BMPS Maps based on changes in the campus master plan discussed earlier in this report. The main difference is in reconfiguring subwatersheds to account for refinements and changes in the Comprehensive Plan. Northwestern College Master Plan 15 13529.000 Stormwater Management Study EXISTING BUFIFERS- f JOI;A LEGEND 0. DURST EXIST. CONTOUR —nom EXIST. STORM SEWER _ EX15T. WATEROCDI WAi EXIIRRs WERdND r R 1111!ERI$T11S PROPOSED WATERSHED O0104DARY WATERSHED DESIGNATION fIP",11IOR GI I1011 ® CAMPUS GREEN _ PROPOSED PARKING ® PROPOSED BUILDING OR RENOVATION II- PROPOSED ROAD POTENTIAL DETENTION/ INFILTRATION PRACTICE POTENTIAL CATCHBASIN FILTERS — LAKE JOHANNA X • POTENTIAL POTENTIAL POTENTIAL EXISTING POTENTIAL CATCHRLTER3BA81N "FILTRATION N XCATCHBASIN �PE x X FILTERSPEfIVIOUS AVE—/ `,0 POND POTENTIAL ILII I - n I m POTENTIAL PE PAVEMENT r EXISTING BUFFERS POTENTIAL LITTLE GREEN ROOF LAKE JOHANNA i I' I II EXISTING BUFFERS NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE �T CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PROPOSED BMPS MAP NORTH HALF G M,L AVWR ]A00 FK�IJRE 5 EXISTING BUFFERS POTENTIAL DEfENT10N/ LAKE INTiLTfiAT10N JOHANNA ' PRACTX LEGEND Q OUTLET EXIST. CONTOUR EXIST. STORY SEWER PROPOSED WATERSHED OBOUNDARY , WATERSHED DESIGNATION DIRE"ON OF FLOW ® CAMPUS GREEN _ PROPOSED PARKING ® PROPOSED BUILDING OR RENOVATION _ PROPOSED ROAD POTENTIAL POTENTIAL POTENTIAL EXISTM POTENTIAL CATCHBASIN NRLTRATION PEfiVI0U3 NFILTRATION CATCHBASN FILT7-4- PRACTICE/ PAVEMENT PRACTICE FILTERS PERVIOUS PAVExy1ENT x x x x__�x x --r _cr _ Z, / 4 0 /� O POTENTIAL I PERVIOUS D PAVEMENT -�� ✓ \ \ , EXISTING BUFFERSG INFILTRATION N PRACTICE/POND LITTLE Cly POTENTIAL \.. \\ LAKE ATH A CSIN \ \\\. JOHANNA - _ \ o z ERS LAKE EXOTNG BUFFERS JOHANNA 0 , 50 300 IAL POND E 50 EXXPANSION III, I �-- \l I �/� CAMPUS MASTER PLAN 0ian W F AUDI mTNORTHWESTERN COLLEGE PROPOSED MPSMAP FKKM 5A ENGINEERS -ARCHITECTS • PUNNENS NORTH HALF f POTENTIAL POTENTIAL POTENTIAL POTENTIAL POTENTIAL POTENTIAL Y GREEN ROOF CATCHBASIN EXIST. CONTOUR —ST --a INFILTRATION POND INFILTRATION INFILTRATION _ FILTERS £7(H0 S WEILANID PRACTICE E}CPANSON PRACTICE PRACTICE 1 BOUNDARY WATERSHED DESIGNATION DIRECTION OF FLOW _ CAMPUS GREEN PROPOSED PARKING PROPOSED BUILDING .'•"'.� •"" v��rww`�t`"•"Z �,'�-�..il %L�y - .r.:- ^' wv*j-.r.. r.-. .N.,��—�__.... . l R ROBERTSON xv STUDENT CENTER a� 10 nay � // ' • � I 0' I - - ° Q QD , Z ' • + — G am IwYi1wx� �� /e 4 r �777- an OV ice, ++nXm AVA E)W7 BUFFER -�f/ POTENTIAL POND EXPANSION POTENTIAL INFILTRATION PRACTICE 150 300 LITTLE LAKE JOHANNA e � j 1 WOOM AMA i n Y EXIST. CONTOUR —ST --a ;1 {ijyll� I EXIST- WAfLRUOD'i iH/'. £7(H0 S WEILANID CHARACTERISTICS PROPOSED WATERSHED 1 BOUNDARY WATERSHED DESIGNATION DIRECTION OF FLOW _ CAMPUS GREEN PROPOSED PARKING PROPOSED BUILDING OR RENOVATION +j . l e � j 1 WOOM AMA It �( ;1� i. ty c r` Now I��i�llfldi i llll,,lts� MMA` NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE i � Y EXIST. CONTOUR It �( ;1� i. ty c r` Now I��i�llfldi i llll,,lts� MMA` NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE — EXunNG BUFFER 1 l CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PROPOSED 8MPS MAP SOUTH HALF DATE: AUGUST 2006 FIGURE 6 LEGEND OUTLET EXIST. CONTOUR —ST --a EXIST. STORM SEWER EXIST- WAfLRUOD'i iH/'. £7(H0 S WEILANID CHARACTERISTICS PROPOSED WATERSHED 1 BOUNDARY WATERSHED DESIGNATION DIRECTION OF FLOW _ CAMPUS GREEN PROPOSED PARKING PROPOSED BUILDING OR RENOVATION PROPOSED ROAD — EXunNG BUFFER 1 l CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PROPOSED 8MPS MAP SOUTH HALF DATE: AUGUST 2006 FIGURE 6 01 POTENTIAL POTENTIAL POTENTIAL POTENTIAL POTENTIAL CATCHBASIN INRLTRATION POND INFILTRATION INFILTRATION FILTER PRACTICE EXPANSION PRACTICE PRACTICE •–(,r—=.ter-ti ------------ on= _s__-- ',..� Ra$ERT54N - U'Al ✓ STUDENT CENTER l C 100 4 '12 -4r �.J..� .. . - • fir ,.r •� - _ � - wme�, .� J?� W a- II.,/• Aomm ARIA I 1 BUFFER f POTENTIALr D EXPANSION POTENTIAL INFILTRATION PRACTICE LITTLE LAKE JOHANNA 1507 300 0 0 mg- EXIs'Ilwa DUFFER yyN GATE: AUGUST 2007 CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PROPOSED NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN EXHIBIT 6A SOUTH HALF VII. GOALS AND POLICIES This Plan also supports the establishment of policies for water resource management which are realistic, attainable and economically feasible, as follows: A. WATER QUANTITY Goal: Use the natural characteristics of the Campus watersheds in combination with development standards and projects, to reduce present and future flood damages and enhance the quality of surface and ground water. Policy: Establish standards for stormwater runoff quantity and quality for Campus development consistent with RWCD, City of Roseville and NPDES Phase II requirements. Policy Implement and enforce a program to detect and eliminate illicit discharges as defined in 40 CFR 122.26(b) (2). B. WATER QUALITY Goal: Protect and improve water quality and the scenic and ecologic values of Campus lakes. The College seeks to maintain and improve the water quality of its lakes using nutrient loading as the yardstick for success. Policy: Preserve and improve the recreational resources associated with water issue. Policy: In cooperation with RCWD adopt standards for stormwater runoff quality from new and re -developments. C. NATURAL RESOURCES Goal: Prioritize the important natural resources of the Campus and preserve key components and characteristics of the terrestrial and aquatic communities necessary for basic ecosystem function. Policy: Maintain a diversity of plant and animal species. Northwestern College Master Plan 20 13529.000 Stormwater Management Study Policy: Assess and monitor colonization and continued distribution of harmful species within Campus lakes and wetlands. Policy: Maintain riparian buffers along the lakes bordering the Campus. D. WETLANDS Goal: Protection of Campus wetlands in accordance with current Rules and Regulations. Policy: Leadership in the management of wetland resources by coordination with the RCW D. E. EROSION CONTROL Goal: Develop proper mitigation measures to allow disturbed environments to recover as quickly as possible. Policy: Establish erosion control practices for construction projects. F. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION, INFORMATION AND EDUCATION Goal: Enhancement of cooperation and sharing of information between various levels of government to enhance efficiency and reduce the likelihood of duplication. Policy Maintain effective and efficient programs and efforts through effective communication and coordination with local, state and federal agencies. G. MONITORING Goal: Develop data needed to assess baseline watershed conditions to deal with development and provide a technical basis for College projects. Policy: Participate in a Campus wide resource monitoring plan in cooperation with other governmental agencies such as RCWD and the Cities of Arden Hills and Roseville. Policy: Assist in the Implementation of the resource data monitoring plan. Northwestern College Master Plan 21 13529.000 Stormwater Management Study H. MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION Goal: Protect Campus stormwater infrastructure. Policy: Develop and implement a plan for the regular inspection and maintenance of water resource infrastructure. Policy Develop and implement a training program to prevent or reduce pollutant runoff resulting from Campus operations. Policy Reporting consistent with NPDES Phase II I. FINANCE Goal: Establish funding mechanisms for plan implementation. Policy: Identify funding sources to support implementation of the Plan. VIII. IMPLEMENTATION Implementation of the Campus Stormwater BMPs will require the development of a Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) once the proposed projects are sufficiently refined. In some respects, the implementation of the CIP will include elements of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that the NPDES program requires of many Cities including Roseville and Arden Hills. Such a plan has six elements: A. PUBLIC EDUCATION AND OUTREACH Distributing educational materials and performing outreach to inform citizens about the impacts polluted stormwater runoff discharges can have on water quality. This could include website links and distribution of education materials. B. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION/INVOLVEMENT Provide opportunities for citizens to participate in program development and implementation. This could include publicizing public hearings and/or encouraging participation on a stormwater management panels. Northwestern College Master Plan 22 13529.000 Stormwater Management Study C. ILLICIT DISCHARGE DETECTION AND ELIMINATION Developing and implementing a plan to detect and eliminate illicit discharges to the storm sewer system. D. CONSTRUCTION SITE RUNOFF CONTROL Developing, implementing, and enforcing an erosion and sediment control program for construction activities. This control measure typically includes silt fences and temporary stormwater detention ponds. E. POST -CONSTRUCTION RUNOFF CONTROL Developing, implementing, and enforcing a program to address discharges of post - construction stormwater runoff from new development and redevelopment areas. Applicable controls would include implementing the BMPs discussed previously in this Plan. F. POLLUTION PREVENTION/GOOD HOUSEKEEPING Developing and implementing a program with the goal of preventing or reducing pollutant runoff from site operations. This control measure typically includes street and parking lot sweeping twice a year. In the near term, the College can include some elements of the BMPs presented here into imminent projects such as landscaping. A good place to start implementing such BMPs would be in conjunction with the College's ongoing program to control invasive species. Longer term, the BMPs that have been identified in this Plan should be incorporated into all development and redevelopment projects. The development of a Stormwater Capital Improvement Program would also be useful in identifying costs and funding sources for the implementation of the BMPs. Northwestern College Master Plan 23 13529.000 Stormwater Management Study APPENDIX Wetland Delineations City of Roseville Regulations Rice Creek Watershed District Regulations NPDES Construction Regulations Best Management Practices ov CHAPTER 1016 SHORELAND, WETLAND AND STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SECTION: 1016.01: Short Title 1016.02: Jurisdiction 1016.03: Statutory Authorization 1016.04: Policy; Statement of Purpose 1016.05: Definitions 1016.06: Enforcement Compliance 1016.07: Disclaimer 1016.08: Interpretation 1016.09: Severability 1016.10: Abrogation and Greater Restrictions 1016.11: Administration 1016.12 Water Management Overlay Districts 1016.13: Shoreland Classifications 1016.14: Water Management Overlay District Lot Standards 1016.15: Additional Lot Dimension Requirements 1016.16: Structure Design Standards 1016.17: General Design Criteria for Structures 1016.18: Design Criteria for Commercial, Industrial, Public and Semi -Public Uses 1016.19: Notifications to the Department of Natural Resources 1016.20: Variances 1016.21: Conditional Uses 1016.22: Nonconformities 1016.23: Subdivision/Platting Provisions 1016.24: Planned Unit Development Requirements 1016.25: Grading, Filling and Land Alteration 1016.26: Storm Water Management 1016.27: Amendment 1016.01: SHORT TITLE: The name of this Chapter shall be THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE SHORELAND, WETLAND, AND STORM WATER MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE. (Ord. 1156,12-12-94) 1016.02: JURISDICTION: The provisions of this Chapter shall apply to the shoreland, wetland and storm water management overlay districts and the City in general as each section specifies. (Ord. 1156, 12-12-94) City of Roseville - Water Management Overlay Districts . j rarc,�l, ., ,,,,�,•,,,,,,,,,,,,,„,,,,�.�,w ,'„, „may w, .11k? Frrilur U\'K R CoShatl�nJ 4r•+rn�.:nth Sk•�cUyror^n7 :k7urnriCnt .��IA�J It 100 Pr. + k+r PU"1!C Naicnk N ci!and, %1a.% 7:, 199! 1016.03: STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION: This Shoreland, Wetland and Storm Water Management Chapter is adopted pursuant to the authorization and policies contained in Minnesota Statutes chapters 103B, 105, 462 and 497; Minnesota Rules, parts 6120.2500 through 6120.3900; Minnesota Rules chapters 8410 and 8420. (Ord. 1156, 12-12-94) 1016.04: POLICY; STATEMENT OF PURPOSE: A. Waters and Wetland Policy: 1. The City's Comprehensive Land Use Plan identifies specific goals and policies related to the proper management of its shoreland, lakes, wetlands, water and soil resources. 2. The City recognizes that the uncontrolled use of shorelands, wetlands, and land alteration activities in general in the City affects the public health, safety and general welfare not only by contributing to the pollution of surface and ground waters, but also by impairing the local tax base. 3. Land development and use impact all receiving waters, especially lakes, by contributing to their impairment through point and nonpoint pollution sources. 4. The City has adopted a Surface Water Management Plan that recognizes that its storm water system is integrated with the management of its natural lakes and wetlands. 5. Therefore, the City has determined that it is in the best interests of the public to manage its Comprehensive Plan and Surface Water Management Plan by a consolidated approach with this Chapter to avoid conflict and duplication to the maximum practical extent. B. Statement of Purpose: to achieve the policies described in the City Comprehensive Plan, State and Federal policies and statutes, the City intends to determine, control and guide future development within and surrounding those land areas which are contiguous to designated bodies of public water and areas of "natural environmental significance" as herein defined and regulated. Specifically, this Chapter purports to: 1. Regulate the placement of sanitary and storm water disposal facilities on lots; 2. Regulate the area of a lot and the length of water frontage suitable for a building site; 3. Regulate alteration of the shorelands and wetlands of public waters; 4. Control natural environment areas of ecological value to maintain existing aquatic, vegetation and wildlife conditions to the maximum extent possible; 5. Regulate the use and subdivision of land within the corporate limits as it relates to public waters, shorelands and storm water; 6. Provide variances from the minimum standards and criteria. (Ord. 1156, 12-12-94) 1016.05: DEFINITIONS: Unless specifically defined below, words or phrases used in this Chapter shall be interpreted so as to give them the same meaning as they have in common usage and to give this Chapter its most reasonable application. For the purpose of this Chapter, the words "must" and "shall" are mandatory and not permissive. All distances, unless otherwise specified, shall be measured horizontally. As used in this Chapter, the following words and terms shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this Section: ACCESSORY STRUCTURE OR FACILITY: Any building or improvement subordinate to a principal use which, because of the nature of its use, can reasonably be located at or greater than normal structure setbacks (such as a detached garage). BLUFF: A topographic feature such as a hill, cliff, or embankment having the following characteristics (an area with an average slope of less than 18 percent over a distance for 50 feet or more shall not be considered part of the bluff): A. Part or all of the feature is located in a shoreland area; B. The slope rises at least twenty five feet (25') above the ordinary high water level of the waterbody; C. The grade of the slope from the toe of the bluff to a point twenty five feet (25') or more above the ordinary high water level averages thirty percent (30%) or greater; and D. The slope must drain toward the waterbody. BLUFF IMPACT ZONE: A bluff, and, only in shoreland districts, land located thirty feet (30') landward from the top of a bluff. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND APPEAL: The Roseville City Council and Mayor. BOATHOUSE: A structure designed and used solely for the storage of water crafts, boats, boating or water craft equipment. BUILDING LINE: A line parallel to a lot line or the ordinary high water level at the required setback beyond which a structure may not extend. COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS: Commercial planned unit developments are typically uses that provide transient, short-term lodging spaces, rooms, or parcels and their operations are essentially service-oriented. For example, hotel/motel accommodations, resorts, recreational vehicle and camping parks, and other primarily service-oriented or office complex activities are commercial planned unit developments. COMMERCIAL USE: The principal use of land or buildings for the sale, lease, rental, or trade of products, goods, and services. COMMISSIONER: The Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources. CONDITIONAL USE: A "land use" or "development" as defined by City Code that may not be appropriate generally, but may be approved by the City Council with appropriate restrictions as provided by the City Code upon a finding that certain conditions as detailed in the Zoning Ordinance exist, the use or development conforms to the comprehensive land use plan of the community, and the use, through the imposition of conditions, is compatible with the existing neighborhoods. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: A permit specially and individually granted in accordance with this Code, by the City Council after review thereof by the Planning Commission .as a flexibility device to enable the City Council to assign dimensions or conditions to a proposed use, after consideration of the impacts on or functions of adjacent and nearby properties and the special problems that the proposed use presents. DECK: A horizontal, unenclosed platform with or without attached railings, seats, trellises, or other features, attached or functionally related to a principal use or site and at any point extending more than three feet (3') above ground. DOCK: A seasonal water -oriented accessory structure or walkway extended from the ordinary high water level into the bed of public waters for access to open water and anchorage of water craft. DUPLEX, TRIPLEX AND QUAD: A dwelling structure on a single lot, having two (2), three (3), and four (4) units, respectively, being attached by common walls and each unit equipped with separate sleeping, cooking, eating, living, and sanitation facilities. DWELLING SITE: A designated location for residential use by one or more persons using temporary or movable shelter, including camping and recreational vehicle sites. DWELLING UNIT: Any structure or portion of a stricture, or other shelter designed as short- or long-term living quarters for one or more persons, including rental or timeshare accommodations such as hotel, and resort rooms and cabins. EXTRACTIVE USE: The use of land for surface or subsurface removal of sand, gravel, rock, industrial minerals, other nonmetallic minerals, and peat not regulated under Minnesota Statutes, sections 93.44 to 93.51. GAZEBO: A seasonal water -oriented accessory structure used as a detached nonheated shelter. It may have a roof, floor, screen walls, but has no sewer or water service. GUEST COTTAGE: A structure used as a dwelling unit that may contain sleeping spaces and kitchens and bathroom facilities in addition to those provided in the primary dwelling unit on a lot. HARDSHIP: The same as that term is defined in Minnesota Statutes chapter 462 (for municipalities). HEIGHT OF BUILDING: "Height of building" shall be as defined in the Minnesota State Building Code. It means the vertical distance between the highest adjoining ground level at the building or ten feet (10') above the lowest ground level, whichever is lower, and the highest point of a flat roof or average height of the highest gable of a pitched or hipped roof. INDUSTRIAL USE: The use of land or buildings for the production, manufacture, warehousing, storage, or transfer of goods, products, commodities, or other wholesale items. INTENSIVE VEGETATION CLEARING: The complete removal of trees or shrubs in a contiguous patch, strip, row, or block. LIFT: A mechanical device used to lift a boat from the water. LOT: A parcel of land designated by plat, metes and bounds, registered land survey, auditors plot, or other accepted means and separated from other parcels or portions by said description for the purpose of sale, lease, or separation. LOT WIDTH: The shortest distance between lot lines measured at the midpoint of the building line. NONCONFORMING USE: A nonconforming use is any use or arrangement of land or structures legally existing prior to the enactment of a Code provision prohibiting such use. NONCONFORMING USES: Any use of a building or premises which, on the effective date of this Chapter, does not, even though lawfully established, comply with all of the applicable use regulations of the zoning district in which such building or premises is located (also see definition of Substandard Use). ORDINARY HIGH WATER LEVEL: The boundary of public waters and wetlands, and shall be an elevation delineating the highest water level which has been maintained for a sufficient period of time to leave evidence upon the landscape, commonly that point where the natural vegetation changes from predominantly aquatic to predominantly terrestrial. For watercourses, the ordinary high water level is the elevation of the top of the bank of the channel. For reservoirs and flowages, the ordinary high water level is the operating elevation of the normal summer pool. PATIO: An inground surface of paving or wood materials, not attached to the main structure. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD): See chapter 1008 of this title. PORCH, SCREENED: A seasonal habitable addition to a residential stricture, considered part of the structure. PUBLIC WATERS: Any "waters" as defined in Minnesota statutes, section 1036.005, subdivisions 15 and 18. RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: A use where the nature of residency is nontransient and the major or primary focus of the development is not service oriented. For example, residential apartments, manufactured home parks, timeshare condominiums, townhouses, cooperatives, and full fee ownership residences would be considered as residential planned unit developments. To qualify as a residential planned unit development, a development must contain at least five (5) dwelling units or sites. SEMIPUBLIC USE: The use of land by a private, nonprofit organization to provide a public service that is ordinarily open to some persons outside the regular constituency of the organization. SENSITIVE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT: The preservation and management of areas unsuitable for development in their natural state due to constraints such as shallow soils over ground water or bedrock, highly erosive or expansive soils, steep slopes, susceptibility to flooding, or occurrence of flora or fauna in need of special protection. SETBACK: The minimum horizontal distance between a structure, sewage treatment system, or other facility and an ordinary high water level, sewage treatment system, top of a bluff, road, highway, property line, or other facility. SEWER SYSTEM: The combination of public and private pipelines or conduits, pumping stations, and force main, and all other construction, devices, appliances, or appurtenances used for conducting sewage or industrial waste or other wastes to a point of ultimate disposal in a public sewage treatment facility. SHORE IMPACT ZONE: Land located between the ordinary high water level of public water and a line parallel to it at a setback of fifty percent (50%) of the structure setback. SHORELAND: Land located within one thousand feet (1,000) from the ordinary high water level of the lakes classified in section 1016.13 of this chapter. The limits of the shorelands may be reduced whenever the waters involved are bounded by topographic divides which extend landward from the waters for lesser distances and when approved by the MnDNR commissioner. SHORELAND MANAGEMENT DISTRICT: Land located within three hundred feet (300') from the ordinary high water level; or the first tier of riparian lots or the first tier of lots or the first tier of lots beyond a public street when the street is adjacent to a public water body, whichever is greater, of certain public waters as established by the City Council as established by this code. SIGNIFICANT HISTORIC SITE: Any archaeological site, standing structure, or other property that meets the criteria for eligibility to the National Register of Historic Places, is listed in the State Register of Historic Sites, or is determined to be an unplatted cemetery that falls under the provisions of Minnesota statutes, section 307.08. An historic site meets these criteria if it is presently listed on either register or if it is determined to meet the qualifications for listing after review by the Minnesota state archaeologist or the director of the Minnesota Historical Society. All unplatted cemeteries are automatically considered to be significant historic sites. STEEP SLOPE: Land where agricultural activity or development is either not recommended or described as poorly suited due to slope steepness and the site's soil characteristics, as mapped and described in available county soil surveys or other technical reports, unless appropriate design and construction techniques and farming practices are used in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. Where specific information is not available, steep slopes are lands having average slopes over twelve percent (12%), as measured over horizontal distances of fifty feet (50') or more, that are not bluffs. STORM WATER POND: A manmade pond capable of holding water seasonally or permanently, the purpose of which is to collect runoff, nutrients, and sediment prior to releasing water into wetlands and natural water bodies. STRUCTURE: Any building or appurtenance, including attached or detached decks and fences. "Structure" does not include aerial or underground utility lines, such as sewer, electric, telephone, telegraph, gas lines, towers, poles, seasonal docks, and other supporting facilities such as at grade driveways and patios. SUBDIVISION: Land that is divided for the purpose of sale, rent, or lease, including planned unit developments. SUBSTANDARD USE: Any use of shorelands existing prior to the date of enactment of any city ordinance which is permitted within the applicable zoning district, but does not meet the minimum lot area and length of water frontage, structure setbacks, or other dimensional standards of the ordinances SURFACE WATER ORIENTED COMMERCIAL USE: The use of land :for commercial purposes, where access to and use of surface water feature is an integral part of the normal conductance of business. Marinas, resorts, and restaurants with transient docking facilities are examples of such use. TOE OF THE BLUFF: The lower point of a fifty foot (50') segment with an average slope exceeding eighteen percent (18%) located in bluff impact zone. See illustration following definition of Top of The Bluff. TOP OF THE BLUFF: The higher point of a fifty foot (50') segment with an average slope exceeding eighteen percent (18%) located in bluff impact zone. See illustration below. ,0 feet --41 Bluff fieieht Bluff" Impact Zone Toe of Blu.9- 2 S feet or more °or greatel slone High Rlufl SetbacL lin ;O feet Water Leti e1 VARIANCE: The same as that term is defined or described in Minnesota statutes, chapter 462 (for municipalities). WATER ORIENTED ACCESSORY STRUCTURE OR FACILITY: A small, aboveground building or other improvement, (except stairways, fences, docks, and retaining walls), which, because of the relationship of its use to a surface water feature, reasonably needs to be located closer to public waters than the normal structure setback. Examples of such structures and facilities include boathouses, gazebos, screen houses, fish houses, pump houses, and detached decks. WETLAND: A land form that is transitional between "terrestrial" and "agdatic systems" as defined in Minnesota statutes, section 103G.005, subdivision 19. WETLAND BOUNDARY: The boundary line between what is considered to be upland and wetland using the methodology for delineating wetlands as prescribed in Minnesota statutes, section 103G.2242, subdivision 2. (Ord. 1156, 12-12-1994; amd. Ord. 1270, 9-23-2002) 1016.06: ENFORCEMENT COMPLIANCE: The use of any shoreland of public waters, the size and shape of lots, the use, size, type and location of strictures on lots; the installation and maintenance of water supply and waste disposal facilities; the filling, grading, lagooning, or dredging of any shoreland area; the cutting of shoreland vegetation and the subdivision of lots shall be in full compliance with the terms of this chapter and other applicable regulations. Constriction of buildings, water supply and city utility service systems and erection of signs shall require a permit, unless otherwise expressly excluded by the requirements of this chapter. (Ord. 1156, 12-12-1994) 1016.07: DISCLAIMER: This chapter does not imply that areas outside of the shoreland, wetland and storm water management overland district or land uses permitted within that district will be free from flooding or flood damages. This chapter does not create liability on the part of the city or its officers or employees for any flood damage that may result from reliance on this chapter or any administrative decisions made under it. (Ord. 1156, 12-12-1994) 1016.08: INTERPRETATION: In their interpretation and application, the provisions of this chapter shall be held to be minimum requirements and shall be liberally construed in favor of the governing body and shall not be deemed a limitation or repeal of any other powers granted by state statutes. (Ord. 1156, 12-12-1994) 1016.09: SEVERABILITY: If any section, clause, provision or portion of this chapter is adjudged unconstitutional or invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this chapter shall not be affected thereby. (Ord. 1156, 12-12-1994) 1016.10: ABROGATION AND GREATER RESTRICTIONS: It is not intended by this chapter to repeal, abrogate, or impair any existing easements, covenants, or deed restrictions. However, where this chapter imposes greater restrictions, the provisions of this chapter shall prevail. (Ord. 1156, 12-12-1994) 1016.11: ADMINISTRATION: A. Enforcement: The community development director is responsible for the overall administration and enforcement of this chapter. Any violation of the provisions of this chapter, the provisions of any permit issued in accordance with this chapter or failure to comply with any of its requirements (including violations of conditions and safeguards established in connection with grants of variances or conditional uses) shall constitute a misdemeanor and shall be "punishable" as defined by law or as otherwise provided in this code. B. Permits Required: 1. In addition to any permit requirements of an underlying district or specific shoreland or waterfront improvements, permits are required for the construction of retaining walls, driveways, parking lots, patios, fences, water related accessory structures, watercraft accessory devices and signs within the building setback area from the ordinary high water mark. Application for a permit shall be made to the community development director or the director's designee on the forms provided. The application shall include the necessary information including visual displays, soil, slope and vegetation protection plans so that city staff can determine the site's suitability for the intended use. 2. All permits within this chapter must specify a termination date, not to exceed twelve (12) months from the date of issuance. A permit may be determined to be null and void by the community development director if it is determined after issuance that false supporting information was filed with the permit application. As part of any such determination, the director may issue a stop work order, post the same on site, send a copy by certified mail to the permittee and determine what other enforcement action is necessary. C. Certificate of Zoning Compliance: The community development director shall issue a certificate of zoning compliance for each activity requiring a permit as specified in this chapter. This certificate shall specify that the use of land conforms to the requirements of this chapter. (Ord. 1156, 12-12-1994) 1016.12: WATER MANAGEMENT OVERLAY DISTRICTS: A. Creation: The Water Management Overlay District hereby created and is divided into the following subdistricts as shown on the Official Zoning Map or an attachment thereto: the Shoreland District, the Wetland Protection District, and the Storm Water District. 1. Shoreland District: All land meeting the definition of shoreland adjacent to the public waters listed in Section 1016.13 of this Chapter. 2. Wetland Protection District: All upland within one hundred feet (100') of the wetland boundary of wetlands and those public waters not specifically listed as shoreland. 3. Storm Water District: All land either within one hundred feet (100') of the normal water level of constructed storm water ponds or wetlands managed for storm water quantity and quality management purposes, or all land below the 100 -year flood elevation of such ponds or wetlands, whichever is most restrictive. B. Official Zoning Map: The amended Official Zoning Map, with Water .Management Overlay Districts, is hereby adopted by reference and declared to be a part of this Chapter. C. Maintenance of Records: Said Official Zoning Map shall be on file in the office of the Community Development Director. The Community Development Director shall maintain the necessary records to maintain and display the Official Zoning Map as amended. D. Boundaries: The boundaries of the overlay districts as shown on the Official Zoning Map are considered to be approximate and must be established on the ground at the time of any application for permit, variance, conditional use, planned unit development or subdivision of land. E. Allowable Land Uses: The existing zoning on the site shall specify the allowable land uses but all such uses must additionally comply with any more restrictive standards and criteria of this Chapter. F. Private Sewer Systems Prohibited: Individual on-site sewage treatment systems are prohibited in all Water Management Overlay Districts. (Ord. 1156, 12-12-1994) 1016.13: SHORELAND CLASSIFICATIONS: The following public waters of the City have been classified either consistent with the criteria found in Minnesota Regulations, part 6120.3300, and the Protected Waters Inventory Map for Ramsey County, Minnesota, or classified by the City when no classification was available from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. The "shoreland area" for the water bodies listed in the table below shall be as defined in this Chapter and shown on the Official Zoning Map. "Wetland protection areas" shall be as defined in subsection 1016.12A2 of this Chapter. "Storm water protection areas" shall be as defined in subsection 1016.12A3 of this Chapter. (Ord. 1156, 12-12-1994) Shoreland Classification Table Lake Name MnDNR ID# Classification MnDNR Designated Shoreland: Lake Josephine 57P GD Lake Owasso 54P GD Little Lake Johanna 58P RD North Bennett 207P GD Ci Designate Shoreland: Langton Lake 49P GD Zimmerman Lake 53W GD Bennett Lake 48W GD Walsh Lake 214W GD Willow Lake .210W GD Oasis Pond 205W GD GD=General Development RD=Recreational Development (Ord. 1156, 12-12-1994; amd. Ord. 1216, 12-14-1998) 1016.14: WATER MANAGEMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT LOT STANDARDS: A. Additional Standards: The following development standards are in addition to any standards that apply specifically to the underlying zoning district. Where there is conflict between the underlying and overlying district standards, the most restrictive shall apply. B. Lot Area and Width Standards: The lot area (in square feet) and lot width standards (in feet) for single and duplex housing on residential lots created after the date of enactment of this Chapter for the lake classifications are the following: 1. Shoreland Overlay District Lot Standards: 2. Wetland Overlay District Lot Standards: The minimum lot area, width and depth requirements of the underlying land use zoning district within this code shall apply provided that not more than twenty five percent (25%) of the lot area may be included in any wetland area to meet the minimum lot area dimension. 3. Storm Water Overlay District Lot Standards: The minimum lot area, width and depth requirements of the underlying land use zoning district within this code shall apply provided that not more than twenty five percent (25%) of the lot area may be included in any storm pond or wetland area (which is below the normal level of the adjacent storm water pond) to meet the minimum lot area dimension. (Ord. 1156, 12-12-1994) 1016.15: ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSION REQUIREMENTS: A. Dwelling Unit Densities: Residential subdivisions with dwelling unit densities exceeding those in the tables in subsections 10 16.1413 1 through B3 of this chapter may only be allowed if designed and approved ds residential planned unit developments under chapter 1008 of this title. Only land above the ordinary high water level of public waters may be used to meet lot area standards. Lot width standards shall be met at both the ordinary high water level and at the building line, except in a residential planned unit development. Not more than twenty five percent (25%) of the lot area of each lot may be included in any wetland, which is below the normal ordinary high water level. B. Controlled Accesses: Lots intended as controlled accesses to public waters or as recreation areas for use by owners of nonriparian lots within subdivisions shall be allowed only as part of a conditional use permit or planned unit development and shall meet or exceed the following standards: 1. They shall be suitable in terms of physical access and potential slope erosion and vegetation damage for the intended uses of controlled access lots; 2. They shall have a specific lot size not less than one hundred seventy feet (170') (two 85 -foot wide lots combined); 3. They shall be jointly owned by all purchasers of lots in the subdivision or by all purchasers of nonriparian lots in the subdivision who are provided riparian access rights on the access lot; and 4. Covenants or other equally effective legal instruments shall be developed that specify which lot owners have authority to use the access lot and what activities are allowed. The activities may include watercraft launching, loading, storage, beaching, mooring, or docking. They may also include other outdoor recreational activities that do not significantly conflict with general public use of the public water or the enjoyment of normal property rights by adjacent property owners. Examples of the nonsignificant conflict activities include swimming, sunbathing, or picnicking. The covenants shall limit the total number of vehicles allowed to be parked and the total number of watercraft allowed to be continuously moored, docked, or stored over water, and shall require centralization of all common facilities and activities in the most suitable locations on the lot to minimize topographic and vegetation alterations. They shall also require all parking areas, storage buildings, and other facilities to be screened by vegetation or topography as much as practical from view from the public water, assuming summer, leaf -on conditions. (Ord. 1156, 12-12-1994) Recreation Development Lakes General Development Lakes Underlying Zones Riparian Lots Nonriparian Lots Riparian Lots Nonriparian Lots Area* Width* Area* Width* Area* Width* Area* Width* R-1 (Single Family) 15,000 100 11,000 85 15,000 100 11,000 85 R-2 (Duplex) .35,000135 26,000 135 26,000 135 17,500 135 * Area means land above the normal ordinary high water level. ** All other uses proposed within a shoreland district shall be in the form of a rezoning to a planned unit development as per Section 1016.24 2. Wetland Overlay District Lot Standards: The minimum lot area, width and depth requirements of the underlying land use zoning district within this code shall apply provided that not more than twenty five percent (25%) of the lot area may be included in any wetland area to meet the minimum lot area dimension. 3. Storm Water Overlay District Lot Standards: The minimum lot area, width and depth requirements of the underlying land use zoning district within this code shall apply provided that not more than twenty five percent (25%) of the lot area may be included in any storm pond or wetland area (which is below the normal level of the adjacent storm water pond) to meet the minimum lot area dimension. (Ord. 1156, 12-12-1994) 1016.15: ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSION REQUIREMENTS: A. Dwelling Unit Densities: Residential subdivisions with dwelling unit densities exceeding those in the tables in subsections 10 16.1413 1 through B3 of this chapter may only be allowed if designed and approved ds residential planned unit developments under chapter 1008 of this title. Only land above the ordinary high water level of public waters may be used to meet lot area standards. Lot width standards shall be met at both the ordinary high water level and at the building line, except in a residential planned unit development. Not more than twenty five percent (25%) of the lot area of each lot may be included in any wetland, which is below the normal ordinary high water level. B. Controlled Accesses: Lots intended as controlled accesses to public waters or as recreation areas for use by owners of nonriparian lots within subdivisions shall be allowed only as part of a conditional use permit or planned unit development and shall meet or exceed the following standards: 1. They shall be suitable in terms of physical access and potential slope erosion and vegetation damage for the intended uses of controlled access lots; 2. They shall have a specific lot size not less than one hundred seventy feet (170') (two 85 -foot wide lots combined); 3. They shall be jointly owned by all purchasers of lots in the subdivision or by all purchasers of nonriparian lots in the subdivision who are provided riparian access rights on the access lot; and 4. Covenants or other equally effective legal instruments shall be developed that specify which lot owners have authority to use the access lot and what activities are allowed. The activities may include watercraft launching, loading, storage, beaching, mooring, or docking. They may also include other outdoor recreational activities that do not significantly conflict with general public use of the public water or the enjoyment of normal property rights by adjacent property owners. Examples of the nonsignificant conflict activities include swimming, sunbathing, or picnicking. The covenants shall limit the total number of vehicles allowed to be parked and the total number of watercraft allowed to be continuously moored, docked, or stored over water, and shall require centralization of all common facilities and activities in the most suitable locations on the lot to minimize topographic and vegetation alterations. They shall also require all parking areas, storage buildings, and other facilities to be screened by vegetation or topography as much as practical from view from the public water, assuming summer, leaf -on conditions. (Ord. 1156, 12-12-1994) 1016.16: STRUCTURE DESIGN STANDARDS: A. Placement of Structures on Lots: When more than one setback applies to a site, stnactures and facilities shall be located to meet the most restrictive setbacks. Where structures exist on the adjoining lots on both sides of a proposed building site, structure setbacks may be altered without a variance to conform to the average setback of adjoining structures from the ordinary high water level, provided the proposed building site is not located in a shore impact zone or in a bluff impact zone. Structures shall be located as follows: All other structure setback requirements shall be as stated in the underlying zoning district for each parcel. STRUCTURE SETBACKS FROM WATER BODY Type of Water Body Structure Setback Structure Setback Roads, Driveway, Parking Maximum from Water Body from Bluff and Other Impervious Surface Bldg/Stntctatre or Setback Height 4 MnDNR and City 75 Ft 1,330 Ft, 30 Ft. 30 Ft. Public Waters Wetland 3 50 Ft. Not Applicable 5 30 Ft. 30 Ft. Storm Pond 10 Ft. Not Applicable 10 Ft. 30 Ft. 1. Setback is measured from the normal ordinary high water level. 2. Setback is measured from the wetland or pond boundary. 3. One water- oriented accessory structure designed in accordance with subsection 1016.17C of this chapter may be set back a minimum distance of 10 feet from the ordinary high water level. 4. See subsection 1016.17G of this chapter. 5. A 30 foot setback from road or parking surfaces may include a combination of land within rights of way and adjacent to the right of way, as well as curb and gutter controlling runoff and sediment to a storm pond. Pedestrian trails shall be exempt from setback requirements. B. Additional Structure Standards for All Districts: 1. Bluff Impact Zones: Structures and accessory facilities, except stairways and landings, shall not be placed within bluff impact zones. 2. Commercial Or Industrial Land Uses: Commercial or industrial land rases without water oriented uses shall be located on lots or parcels without public waters frontage, or, if located on lots or parcels with public waters frontage, the principal structure, accessory buildings and parking areas, shall either be set back one hundred fifty feet (150') from the ordinary high water level or be set back one hundred feet (100') and be fifty percent (50%) screened by opaque vegetation from view from the water by vegetation or topography, assuming summer, leaf -on conditions. (Ord. 1156, 12-12-1994) 3. Fences: In bluff impact, shoreland, and wetland zones, fences shall be set back the same distance from the shoreline as required for the principal structure or attached deck on the lot, except that a fence on a lot with a preexisting principal structure and attached deck may extend to the same setback as the deck or the structure. Fences shall be of similar design, texture, and color as the principal structure or shall be of an earth tone or color and material. Fences used for safety or containment may be set within twenty five feet (25') of the OHWL. Such fences shall be a maximum of twenty five percent (25%) opaque, and no more than forty two inches (42") in height. Such fences shall be clad in earth tone coatings. With the exception of regulations in this subsection, fences in bluff impact, shoreland, and wetland zones shall meet all height and setback requirements of section 1012.02 of this title. Fences placed on the road side of a lot with water or wetland frontage shall comply with front yard fence requirements of section 1012.02 of this title. (Ord. 1270, 9-23-2002) 1016.17: GENERAL DESIGN CRITERIA FOR STRUCTURES: A. Low Floor Elevations: All habitable structures constructed within the overlay district shall be built with their lowest floor, including basement, no lower than the following elevation criteria, whichever provides the greater degree of protection as determined by the city engineer: 1. Two feet (2') above the 100 -year flood elevation, if known; or 2. At least three feet (3') above the highest known water level, or three feet (3') above the ordinary high water level, whichever is higher; or 3. At least three feet (3') above the "wetland boundary" as defined in Section 1016.05 of this Chapter. The City Engineer shall develop and maintain a list of elevations of known 1 00 -year flood levels, ordinary high water levels, highest known water levels and wetland boundary levels as they become available through special studies or the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. B. Low Floor Elevations Exceptions: A variance may be granted from the elevation requirements specified in subsection A above only where a hardship is determined and provided the structure is flood -proofed according to State and Federal standards for floodplain areas. Water -oriented accessory structures may have the lowest floor placed lower than the elevation determined in subsection A if the structure is constructed of flood -resistant materials to the elevation, electrical and mechanical equipment is placed above the elevation and, if long duration flooding is anticipated, the structure is built to withstand ice action and wind -driven waves and debris. C. Permitted Water -Oriented Accessory Structures: Each lot may have one water -oriented nonhabitable accessory structure not meeting the normal structure setback in subsection 1016.16A of this Chapter if this water - oriented accessory structure complies with the following provisions: 1. Water oriented accessory structure dimensional requirements: a. Maximum floor area: 250 square feet b. Maximum width as viewed from water: 12 feet Maximum height: d. Setback from ordinary high water: 10 feet e. Boathouse setback from ordinary high water level: 10 feet" Side yard setback from property line: 20 feet g. Detached deck height above grade: 8 feet * 50% of distance between ordinary high water mark and the structure setback from the water. ** Also permitted for docks, and off-season storage of ice fishing houses and docks. 2. The structure or facility shall be constructed of material architecturally similar in design, texture, and color to the principal structure on the lot; the design shall be reviewed by the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. 3. The structure shall be screened a minimum of fifty percent (50%) by opaque vegetation or topography on the three (3) walls seen from the lake with ecologically suited landscaping landward of the ordinary high water level from the lake. 4. The roof shall not be used as a deck or used as a storage area. 5. The structure or facility shall not be designed or used for human habitation and shall not contain utility systems. D. Stairways, Chair Lifts, and Stair and Deck Landings: Stairways and chair lifts shall be used for achieving access up and down bluffs and steep slopes to shore areas. Stairways and lifts shall meet the following design requirements: 1. Stairways and chair lifts shall not exceed four feet (4) in width on residential lots. Wider stairways may be used for commercial properties, public open -space recreational properties, and planned unit developments; 2. Stair and deck landings for stairways and chair lifts on residential lots shall not exceed forty eight (48) square feet in area. Landings larger than forty eight (48) square feet may be used for commercial properties, public open -space recreational properties, and planned unit developments; 3. Canopies or roofs shall not be permitted on stairways, chair lifts, or stair or deck landings; 4. Stairways, chair lifts, and stair or deck landings shall be either constructed above the ground on posts or pilings, or placed into the ground, provided they are designed and built in a manner that ensures control of soil erosion; 5. Stairways, chair lifts, and stair or deck landings shall be located in the most visually inconspicuous portions of lots, as viewed from the surface of the public water assuming summer, leaf -on conditions, whenever practical; and 6. Facilities such as ramps, chair lifts, or mobility paths for physically handicapped persons shall be permitted for achieving access to shore areas, provided that the dimensional and performance standards of subsections I through 5 are complied with in addition to the requirements of Minnesota Rules, chapter 1340. E. Significant Historic Sites: No structure may be placed on a significant historic site in a manner that affects the values of the site unless adequate information about the site has been removed and documented in a public repository. F. Steep Slopes, Visibility and Erosion: The Public Works and Community Development Directors shall evaluate possible soil erosion impacts and development visibility from public waters prior to issuance of a permit for construction of roads, driveways, structures, or other improvements on steep slopes. When determined necessary, conditions shall be attached to the permit to prevent erosion and preserve existing vegetation, screening of structures, vehicles, and other facilities as viewed from the surface of public waters, assuming summer, leaf -on vegetation. G. Height of Structures: All structures in residential districts, except steeples and chimneys from churches and institutional uses, shall not exceed thirty feet (30') in height. H. Placement and Design of Roads, Driveways, and Parking Areas: 1. Public and private roads and parking areas shall be designed to take advantage of natural vegetation and topography to achieve maximum screening from view from public waters. The Public Works Director shall review all roads and parking areas to ascertain they are designed and constructed to minimize and control erosion to public waters, consistent with the field office technical guides of the Ramsey County Soil and Water Conservation District, or other applicable technical materials and best management guidelines. 2. Roads, driveways, and parking areas shall meet structure setbacks outlined in subsection 1016.16A and shall not be placed within bluff and shore impact zones, when other reasonable and feasible placement alternatives exist. If no alternatives exist, they may be placed within these areas, and shall be designed to minimize adverse impacts. 3. Public and private watercraft, canoe rack storage, access ramps, approach roads, and access -related parking areas may be placed within shore impact zones provided the vegetative screening and erosion control conditions of this subsection are met. For private facilities, the grading and filling provisions of Section 1016.25 of this Chapter shall be met. (Ord. 1156, 12-12-94) 1016.18: DESIGN CRITERIA FOR COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, PUBLIC AND SEMI- PUBLIC USES: A. Uses With Water -Oriented Needs: Surface water -oriented commercial uses and industrial, public, or semi- public uses with similar needs to have access to and use of public waters may be located on parcels or lots with frontage on public waters. Those uses with water -oriented needs must meet impervious coverage limits, setbacks, and other zoning standards in this Chapter. The uses shall also be designed to incorporate topographic and vegetative screening of parking areas and structures. B. Uses Without Water -Oriented Needs: Uses and surface parking without water -oriented needs shall be located on lots or parcels without public waters frontage, or, if located on lots or parcels with public waters frontage, must be set back double the normal ordinary high water level setback and shall be screened by fifty percent (50%) opaque or more screen from view from the water by vegetation or topography, assuming summer, leaf - on conditions. (Ord. 1156, 12-12-94) 1016.19: NOTIFICATIONS TO THE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES: A. Notice of Public Hearings: Copies of all notices of any public hearings to consider variances, ordinance amendments, PUDs, or conditional uses affecting a MnDNR designated shoreland district shall be sent to the MnDNR, Division of Waters Regional Hydrologist and postmarked at least ten (10) days before the hearings. Notices of hearings to consider proposed subdivisions/plats shall include copies of the subdivision/plat. B. Notice of Approval: A copy of approved amendments and subdivisions/plats, and final decisions granting variances, PVDs or conditional uses in a MnDNR designated shoreland district shall be sent to the MnDNR, Division of Waters Regional Hydrologist and postmarked within ten (10) days of final action. (Ord. 1156, 12- 12-94) 1016.20: VARIANCES: A. Procedure: Variances in these overlay districts may only be granted in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, chapter 462. A variance shall not circumvent the general purposes and intent of this Chapter. No variance shall be granted for a use that is prohibited within the zoning district in which the subject property is located. Conditions may be imposed by the City Council when granting of a variance to ensure compliance and to protect adjacent properties and the public interest. B. Notice of Approval: When a variance is approved in a MnDNR designated shoreland district by the City Council after the Department of Natural Resources has formally recommended denial in the hearing record, the notification of the approved variance required in subsection 1016.1913 shall also include the Board of Adjustment's summary of the public record/testimony, the findings of facts, and conclusions which supported the issuance of the variance. (Ord. 1156, 12-12-94) 1016.21: CONDITIONAL USES: Conditional uses allowable within shoreland areas shall be subject to the review and approval procedures of this Code. The following additional evaluation criteria and conditions apply within shoreland areas: A. Evaluation Criteria: A thorough evaluation of the waterbody and the topographic, vegetation, and soil conditions on the site shall be made to ensure: 1. The prevention of soil erosion or other possible pollution of public waters, both during and after construction; 2. The visibility of structures and other facilities as viewed from public waters is limited; 3. The types, uses, and numbers of watercraft that the project will generate can be safely accommodated on the site; 4. The impact the proposed use may have on the water quality of the water body is not excessive. B. Conditions Attached to Conditional Use Permits: The City Council, upon consideration of the criteria listed above and the purposes of this Chapter may attach such conditions to the issuance of the conditional use permits as it deems necessary. Such conditions may include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. Increased setbacks from the ordinary high water level; 2. Limitations on the natural vegetation to be removed or the requirement that additional vegetation be planted; and 3. Special provisions for the location, design, and use of structures, watercraft launching and docking areas, and vehicle parking areas. (Ord. 1156, 12-12-94) 1016.22: NONCONFORMITIES: All legally established nonconformities as of the date of this Code amendment may continue, but they shall bc managed according to applicable State statutes and other regulations of the City for the subjects of alterations and additions, repair after damage, discontinuance of use and intensification of use. The following standards apply to nonconforming lots and uses in the shoreland management areas: A. Construction on Nonconforming Lots of Record: 1. Lots of record in the office on the County Recorder on the date of enactment of the City shoreland controls (March 27, 1974) that do not meet the requirements of this Chapter may be allowed as building sites without variances from lot size requirements provided; the use is permitted in the zoning district; all sanitary requirements of the City Code are complied with insofar as practical; and the minimum lot size and length of water frontage shall be not less than seventy percent (70%) of standard lot water frontage requirements; the lot has been in separate ownership from abutting lands since the original adoption of the City shoreland controls (March 27, 1974). 2. A variance from setback requirements shall be obtained before any use or building permit is issued for a lot. In evaluating the variance, the Board of Adjustment shall consider, in addition to the requirements of Section 10 16.20, public utilities available to the lot and shall deny the variance if adequate facilities cannot be provided. 3. If, in a group of two (2) or more contiguous lots under one ownership since the original adoption of the City shoreland controls (March 27, 1974), any individual lot does not meet the requirements of Section 10 16.17, the lot shall not be considered as a separate parcel of land for the purposes of development. The lot shall be combined with the one or more contiguous lots so they equal one or more parcels of land, each meeting the requirements of Sections 1016.14 through 1016.16 of this Chapter. B. Additions/Expansions to Nonconforming Structures: All additions or expansions to the outside dimensions of an existing nonconforming structure must meet the setback, height, and other requirements of Sections 1016.14 through 1016.16. Any deviation from these requirements may only be authorized by a variance pursuant to Section 1016.20. C. Deck Additions: Deck additions may be allowed, without a variance, to a structure which does not meet the required setback from the ordinary high water level, if all of the following criteria and standards are met: 1. The structure existed prior to the date the City's original shoreland stricture setbacks were established on March 27, 1974. 2. A thorough evaluation of the property and structure reveals no reasonable location for a deck meeting or exceeding the existing ordinary high water level setback of the structure. 3. The new deck encroachment toward the ordinary high water level does not exceed fifteen percent (15%) of the existing setback of the structure from the ordinary high water level or does not encroach closer than thirty feet (30'), whichever is more restrictive; and the deck shall be constructed of materials similar to the materials of the principal structure, wood, or earth tone; and the new deck shall not be roofed or screened. D. Existing Decks: Existing decks, at the date of adoption of this Chapter, which meet the required setbacks and have had valid building permits, may be enclosed as part of the structure. Deck extensions beyond and from a nonconforming, enclosed deck which would increase the nonconforming setback, shall not be permitted. (Ord. 1156, 12-12-94) 1016.23: SUBDIVISION/PLATTING PROVISIONS: A. Land Suitability: Each lot created through subdivision, including planned unit developments authorized under Chapter 1008 of this Title and Section 1016.24 of this Chapter, shall be suitable for the proposed use as defined by the suitability analysis. Suitability analysis shall consider susceptibility to flooding, existence of wetlands, soil and rock formations with severe limitations for development, severe erosion potential, steep topography, availability of City sewer and water, near -shore aquatic conditions unsuitable for water-based recreation, important fish and wildlife habitat, presence of significant historic sites, or any other feature of the natural land likely to be harmful to the health, safety, or welfare of Riture residents of the proposed subdivision or of the community. B. Consistency With Other Controls: Subdivisions shall conform to all official controls of this community. A subdivision shall not be approved where a later variance from one or more standards in official controls would be needed to use the lots for their intended purpose. Each lot shall meet the minimum lot size and dimensional requirements of Sections 1016.14 through 1016.16. C. Information Requirements: Sufficient information shall be submitted by the applicant for the community to make a determination of land suitability. The information shall include at least the following: 1. Topographic contours at two foot (2) intervals or less from City public works maps or more accurate sources, showing limiting site characteristics; 2. The surface water features required in Minnesota Statutes, section 505.02, subdivision 1, to be shown on plats, obtained from United States Geological Survey quadrangle topographic maps or more accurate sources; 3. Adequate soil information to determine suitability for building and public utilities for every lot from the most current existing sources or from field investigations such as soil borings or other methods; 4. Information regarding adequacy of domestic City water supply; extent of anticipated vegetation and topographic alterations; near -shore aquatic conditions, including depths, types of bottom sediments, and aquatic vegetation; and proposed methods for controlling storm water runoff and erosion, both during and after construction activities; 5. Location of 100 -year flood plain areas and floodway districts from existing adopted maps or data; and 6. A line or contour representing ordinary high water level, the toe and the top of bluffs, and the minimum building setback distances from the top of the bluff and the lake or stream. D. Dedications: When an on-site storm water ponding area is required by a project to store surface water runoff, the City may require easements over natural drainage or ponding areas for future maintenance of storm water and significant wetlands. E. Platting: All subdivisions that create three (3) or more lots or parcels that are two and one-half (2 1/2) acres or less in size shall be processed as a plat in accordance with City Subdivision Regulations'. (Ord. 1156, 12-12- 94) 1016.24: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS: A. Types of PUDs Permissible: Planned unit developments (PUDs) are allowed in shoreland areas for new projects on undeveloped land, redevelopment of previously built sites, or conversions of existing buildings and land, provided they comply with the requirements of this Section. B. Processing of PUDs: Planned unit developments shall be processed as a rezoning, subject to the procedures in Chapter 1008 of this Title. The total project density shall not exceed the allowable densities calculated in the project density evaluation procedures in subsections E and F. Approval cannot occur on any PUD until the State environmental review process (EAW/EIS) when required, is complete. C. Application For A PUD: The applicant for a PUD must submit the application documents listed in Chapter 1008 of this Title prior to review and final action being taken on the application request. D. Site Suitable Area Evaluation: Proposed new or expansions to existing planned unit developments within the overlay district shall be evaluated using the following procedures and standards to determine the suitable area for the construction site of the development. The suitable area shall be determined by excluding from the project development area all wetlands, bluffs, or land below the ordinary high water level of public waters. E. Residential PUD Base Density Evaluation: The suitable area within each tier of lots adjacent to a MnDNR shoreland or City classified lake shall meet or exceed the suitability analyses herein and the City's design criteria. 1. The maximum floor area coverage of the site shall be thirty percent (30%) for any residential PUD within the overlay district. 2. Including both existing and proposed units and sites, the inside building area sizes need not include decks, patios, stoops, steps, accessory structures, or porches and basements, unless they are habitable space. F. Commercial PUD Base Density Evaluation: 1 Title 11 of this Code. 1. The floor area percent coverage of the site shall not exceed thirty percent (30%) for any commercial planned unit development within the overlay district. 2. Including both existingand proposed units and sites, computation of inside building area sizes need not include decks, patios, stoops, steps, accessory structures, or porches and basements, runless they are habitable or occupied space. O. Maintenance and Administration Requirements: Before final approval of a planned unit development, adequate provisions shall be developed for preservation and maintenance in perpetuity of open spaces and for the continued existence and functioning of the development. 1. Open Space Preservation: Deed restrictions, covenants, permanent easements, public dedication and acceptance, or other equally effective and permanent means shall be provided to ensure long-term preservation and maintenance of open space. The instruments shall include all of the following protections: a. Business and industrial uses (for residential PVDs) prohibited; b. Vegetation and topographic alterations other than routine maintenance prohibited; c. Construction of additional buildings or storage of vehicles and other materials not owned by the occupants prohibited; d. Uncontrolled beaching of watercraft prohibited. 2. Development Organization and Functioning: All residential planned unit developments shall have an owners association with the following features: a. Membership shall be mandatory for each dwelling unit or site purchaser and any successive purchasers; b. Each member shall pay a pro rata share of the association's expenses, and unpaid fees may become liens on units or sites; c. Fees shall be adjustable to accommodate changing conditions; and d. The association shall be responsible for insurance, taxes, and maintenance of all commonly owned property and facilities. 3. Open Space Requirements: Planned unit developments within shoreland districts shall contain open space meeting all of the following criteria: a. At least fifty percent (50%) of the total project area shall be preserved as open space. (Dwelling units or sites, road rights of way, land covered by road surfaces, parking areas, or structures, except water -oriented accessory structures or facilities, are developed areas and shall not be included in the computation of minimum open space); b. Open space shall include areas with physical characteristics unsuitable for development in their natural state, and areas containing significant historic sites or unplatted cemeteries; c. Open space may include outdoor recreational facilities for use by owners of dwelling units or sites, by guests staying in commercial dwelling units or sites, and by the general public; d. Open space shall not include commercial facilities or uses, but may contain water -oriented accessory structures or facilities; e. The appearance of open space areas, including topography, vegetation, and allowable uses, shall be preserved by use of restrictive deed covenants, permanent easements, public dedication and acceptance, or other equally effective and permanent means; and f. The shore impact zone, based on normal structure setbacks, shall be included as open space. For residential PUDs, at least fifty percent (50%) of the shore impact zone area of existing developments or at least seventy percent (70%) of the shore impact zone area of new developments shall be preserved in a natural or existing vegetative state. For commercial PUDs, at least fifty percent (50%) of the shore impact zone shall be preserved in its natural state. 4. Erosion Control and Storm Water Management: Erosion control and storm water management plans shall be developed and the PUD shall be: a. Designed, and the construction managed, to minimize the likelihood of serious erosion occurring either during or after construction. This shall be accomplished by limiting the amount and length of time of bare ground exposure. Temporary ground covers, sediment entrapment facilities, vegetates] buffer strips, or other appropriate techniques shall be used to minimize erosion impacts on surface water features; and b. Designed and constructed to effectively manage reasonably expected quantities and qualities of storm water runoff. Impervious surface coverage within any lot shall not exceed twenty five percent (25%) of the tier area, except that for commercial PVDs thirty five percent (35%) impervious surface coverage may be allowed in the first tier of general development lakes with an approved storm water management plan and consistency with this Chapter. 5. Centralization and Design of Facilities: Centralization and design of facilities and structures shall be done according to the following standards: a. Planned unit developments shall be connected to publicly owned water supply and sewer systems; b. Dwelling units or building sites shall be clustered into one or more groups and located on suitable areas of the site. They shall be designed and located to meet or exceed the following dimensional standard for the relevant shoreland classification: setback from the ordinary high water level, elevation above the surface water features, and maximum height. Setbacks from the ordinary high water level shall be in accordance with subsection 1016.14B1 of this Chapter for developments with density increases; c. Shore recreation facilities, including but not limited to swimming areas, docks, and watercraft mooring areas and launching ramps, shall be centralized and located in areas suitable for them. Evaluation of suitability shall include consideration of land slope, water depth, vegetation, soils, depth to ground water and bedrock, or other relevant factors. The number of spaces provided for continuous beaching, mooring, or docking of watercraft shall not exceed one for each allowable dwelling unit or site in the first tier (notwithstanding existing mooring sites in an existing commercially used harbor). Launching ramp facilities, including a dock for loading and unloading equipment, may be provided for use by occupants of dwelling units or sites located in other tiers; d. Structures, parking areas, and other facilities shall be treated to reduce visibility as viewed from public waters and adjacent shorelands by vegetation, topography, increased setbacks, color, or other means acceptable to the City, assuming summer, leaf -on conditions. Vegetative and topographic screening shall be preserved, if existing, or may be required to be provided; e. Accessory structures and facilities, except water oriented accessory structures, shall meet the required principal structure setback and must be centralized; and f. Water -oriented accessory structures and facilities may be allowed if they meet or exceed design standards contained in Section 1016.15 of this Chapter and are centralized. (Ord. 1156, 12-12-94) 1016.25: GRADING, FILLING AND LAND ALTERATION: A. Permit Required: No person, firm or corporation may engage in any excavation, grading, surfacing or filling of land in the City without first securing a permit as set forth in this Section. 1. Permit from City Engineer/Public Works Director: A permit is required from the City Engineer/Public Works Director or designee, for any of the following activities: a. Placement of or grading of more than ten (10) cubic yards of material on steep slopes adjacent to lakes and wetlands or within the shore or bluff impact zones. b. Placement of or grading of more than fifty (50) cubic yards of earthen material anywhere in the City. c. Where filling or grading occurs within ten feet (10') of a property line or when such activity alters the drainage patterns of adjacent properties. 2. Permit from City Council: A permit from the City Council is required for any projects meeting the following criteria: a. Any fill, grading, or drainage of a public water or a wetland, provided the City Council first determines that the project is either exempt from the 1991 Wetlands Conservation Act or certifies the replacement of any loss of wetland area, values and functions in accordance with Minnesota Rules, chapter 8420 as amended. Questions relating to wetland type, location, area, functions and values must be referred to the technical advisory panel established by Minnesota Statutes section 103G.2242 as amended. b. For any filling or excavating on developed land zoned R-1 or R-2 where the site is less than one acre and the fill or excavation exceeds five hundred (500) cubic yards. c. For any filling or excavating on developed land zoned R-1 or R-2 where the site is one acre or greater and the proposed fill/excavation exceeds one thousand (1,000) cubic yards. d. For any filling or excavating on undeveloped land zoned R-1 or R-2 where the site is less than one acre LE C It E and the proposed fill/excavation exceeds two thousand (2,000) cubic yards. e. For any filling or excavating on undeveloped land zoned R -I or R-2 where the site is greater than one acre and the proposed till/excavation exceeds four thousand (4,000) cubic yards. f. For any filling or excavating on developed commercial/industrial property where the site is less than two and one-half (2 1/2) acres and the proposed fill/excavation exceeds two thousand five hundred (2,500) cubic yards. g. For any filling or excavating on developed commercial/industrial property where the site is greater than two and one-half (2 1/2) acres and the proposed fill/excavation exceeds five thousand (5,000) cubic yards. h. For any filling or excavating on undeveloped commercial/industrial property where the site is less than two and one-half (2 1/2) acres and the proposed fill/excavation exceeds five thousand (5,000) cubic yards. L For any filling or excavating on undeveloped commercial/industrial property where the site is greater than two and one-half (2 1/2) acres and the proposed fill/excavation exceeds ten thousand (10,000) cubic yards. Applications For Permits, Additional Information: All applications for permits for grading and filing activities or land disturbances within the overlay district resulting in more than one acre of exposed soil shall be accompanied by plans, specifications, and completion schedules in conformance with the "Ramsey County Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook" prepared by the Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District, 1989 as amended. Building Permits, Special Provisions: All building permits involving any excavation, fill or grading shall contain special provisions that specify; 1. That the permittee is responsible for the cleanup and any damages resulting from soil eroded from the building site onto public streets and storm sewer system and/or any adjoining private property; and 2. That the permittee shall install and maintain either silt fencing along the lot boundaries where runoff is possible to public streets and adjoining private property or maintain a temporary mulch on all exposed soil at a rate specified by the City Engineer. Shoreland Alterations: Alterations of vegetation and topography shall be regulated to prevent erosion into public waters, fix nutrients, preserve shoreland aesthetics, preserve historic values, prevent bank slumping, and protect fish and wildlife habitat. Fill and grading activities within shoreland shall comply with subsections 1016.25A2a through A21 and 1016.25B. Vegetation Alterations in Shoreland Areas: 1. Exemption: Vegetation alteration necessary for the constriction of structures and roads and parking areas regulated by Sections 1016.14 through 1016.16 of this Chapter are exempt from the vegetation alteration standards that follow. 2. Vegetation Alteration Standards: Removal or alteration of vegetation is allowed subject to the following standards: a. Intensive vegetation clearing within the shore and bluff impact zones and on steep slopes is not allowed. Intensive vegetation clearing outside of the impact zones is allowable as a conditional use if an erosion control and sedimentation plan is developed and approved by the Ramsey County Soil and Water Conservation District. b. In shore and bluff impact zones and on steep slopes, limited clearing of trees and shrubs and cutting, pruning, and trimming of trees may be allowed to provide a view to the water from the principal dwelling site and to accommodate the placement of lawns and new vegetation, stairways and landings, picnic areas, access paths, beach and watercraft access areas, and permitted water -oriented accessory structures or facilities, provided that the screening of structures, vehicles, or other facilities as viewed from the water, assuming summer, leaf -on conditions, is not substantially reduced; and c. The above provisions are not applicable to the removal of trees, limbs, or branches that are dead, diseased, or pose safety hazards. 3. Connections to Public Waters: Excavations where the intended purpose is connection to a public water, such as boat slips, canals, lagoons, and harbors, shall be controlled by subsections A through D of this section. Permission for excavations may be given only after the commissioner has approved the proposed connection to public waters and other needed approvals have been obtained. (®rd. 1156, 12-12-1994) 1016.26: STORM WATER MANAGEMENT: The following general and specific standards shall apply to all developments within the city: A. General Standards: 1. Existing Natural Drainageways: When possible, existing natural drainageways, and vegetated soil surfaces shall be used to convey, store, filter, and retain storm water runoff before discharge to public waters. 2. Minimum Disturbance: Development shall be planned and conducted in a manner that will minimize the extent of disturbed areas, runoff velocities, erosion potential, and reduce and delay runoff volumes. Disturbed areas shall be stabilized and protected as soon as possible and facilities or methods used to retain sediment on the site. 3. Constructed Facilities: When development density, topographic features, and soil and vegetation conditions are not sufficient to adequately handle storm water runoff using natural features and vegetation, various types of constructed facilities such as diversions, settling basins, skimming devices, dikes, waterways, and ponds may be used. Preference shall be given to designs using surface drainage, vegetation, and infiltration rather than buried pipes and manmade materials and facilities. B. Specific Standards: 1. Impervious Surface Coverage: Impervious surface coverage of a site shall not exceed twenty five percent (25%) of the site area in a shoreland or wetland overlay district unless storm water is conveyed to an approved, on-site or regional storm water ponding/retention facility designed to accommodate the increased runoff prior to discharge from the site into public waters or wetlands. 2. Review by City Engineer: All proposed storm water facilities shall be reviewed by the city engineer and certified for compliance with the city's surface water management plan, National Urban Runoff Program (NURP) standards, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's (MPCA) Urban Best Management Practices, and any established standards of the water management organization having jurisdiction in the project area. 3. Commercial, Industrial, and Residential Development Affectation: All commercial and industrial developments and redevelopments affecting more than five (5) acres of land and all residential developments affecting more than five (5) acres of land shall: a. Be served by storm water ponding facilities, on- or off-site, designed to remove a minimum of ninety percent (90%) of total suspended solids resulting from the runoff from a one inch (I") rainfall event, and b. Within the development, provide for settling chambers, sumps, dry ponds or other devices to provide for the filtering or settling of fine sands prior to discharge into the city's storm water system. 4. Private Storm Water Facilities: All private storm water facilities shall be maintained in proper condition consistent with the performance standards for which they were originally designed. All settled materials from ponds, sumps, grit chambers, and other devices, including settled solids, shall be removed and properly disposed of on a five (5) year interval. One to five (5) year waivers from this requirement may be granted by the city engineer when the owner presents evidence that the facility has additional capacity to remove settled solids in accordance with the original design capacity. 5. Inventory of Private Storm Water Facilities: Upon adoption of this chapter, the city engineer shall inventory and maintain a data basis for all private storm water facilities requiring maintenance to assure compliance with this section. (Ord. 1239, 4-24-2000) 1016.27: AMENDMENT: This chapter may be amended whenever the public necessity and the general welfare require such amendment by following the procedure specified in this section. A. Request For Amendment: Requests for amendment of this chapter shall be initiated by a petition of the owner or owners of the actual property, a recommendation of the planning commission or by action of the City Council. B. Application: An application for an amendment shall be filed with the zoning administrator. All applications for changes in the boundaries of the zoning district which are initiated by the petition of the owner or owners of the property, the zoning of which is proposed to be changed, shall be accomplished by a map or.plat showing the lands proposed to be changed and all lands within five hundred feet (500') of the boundaries of the property proposed to be rezoned, together with a certificate of abstract showing the names of registered property owners within three hundred fifty feet (350'). C. Notice: Notice shall be sent by letter, when an amendment application has been filed for change in district boundary, to all property owners within two hundred feet (200') as to the time and place of the public hearing. D. Public Hearing: Upon receipt in proper form of the application and other requested material, the planning commission shall conduct a public hearing in the manner prescribed in the zoning code as described in section 1015.03 of this title. E. Fee: to defray the administrative costs of processing of requests for an amendment to this chapter, a fee of one hundred dollars ($100.00) shall be paid by pet0itioner. (Ord. 722, 3-18-1974) Rule C: Storm -Water Management Plans I Rice Creek Watershed District Page 1 of 4 RICIE CREEK WATIERSHIED DISTRICI Home » Rules » RCWD Rules Rule C: Storm -Water Management Plans 1. Policy. It is the policy of the Board of Managers to: (a) Manage stormwater and snowmelt runoff on a regional or subwatershed basis and promote natural infiltration of runoff throughout the District to: o (1) Provide effective water quality treatment and where possible provide such treatment prior to discharge to surface waterbodies and wetlands. o (2) Ensure that future peak rates of runoff are less than or equal to existing rates. o (3) Maximize infiltration and control run-off volume increase. (b) Require stormwater facilities to be constructed on individual sites where regional facilities are not available. 2. Regulation. A permit and stormwater management plan is required under this rule for new development, redevelopment, or additions to an existing site. 3. Design Criteria For Stormwater Management Plans. Stormwater management plans must comply with the following criteria: • (a) A hydrograph method based on sound hydrologic theory must be used to analyze stormwater runoff for the design or analysis of flows and water levels within and off the project site. • (b) Stormwater runoff rates for the proposed project must not exceed pre -project runoff rates for the critical one- year or two-year and 100 -year frequency events. • (c) Regional detention basins will be utilized to manage peak flow rates and meet water quality objectives where possible. On-site detention basins will be utilized when regional basins are not in place or are not feasible. • (d) Analysis of flood levels, storage volumes, and flow rates for waterbodies and detention basins must be based on the range of rainfall and snow melt durations which produces the critical (highest) flood levels and discharges. • (e) Detention basins must be designed to provide: o (1) An outlet structure to control the 1 -year or 2 -year & 100 -yr frequency events u> pre -project peak runoff sites. o (2) An identified overflow spillway sufficiently stabilized to convey flows greater than the 100 -year critical storm event. o (3) Access for future maintenance. • (f) Permanent sedimentation and water quality ponds are required and must be designed to provide: o (1) Water quality features consistent with NURP criteria and District wet pond criteria (see appendix). o (2) A permanent wet pool with dead storage of at least equal to the i unoff from a 2.5 rainfall over the area tributary to the pond. o (3) An outlet structure capable of preventing migration of floating debris and oils for at least the one-year storm. o (4) Access for future maintenance. (g) The proposed project must not adversely affect water levels off the site during or after construction. (h) Stormwater Management Plans under this rule must conform with approved Municipal Stormwater http://www.ricecreekwcl.com/ruies/rcwd/c 11/13/2006 Rule C: Storm -Water Management Plans I Rice Creek Watershed District Page 2 of 4 Management Plans. (i) Outfall structures within wetlands and public waters and public waters wetlands must incorporate a stilling - basin, surge -basin, energy dissipater, placement of ungrouted natural rock riprap or other devices to minimize disturbance and erosion of natural shoreline and bed resulting from stormwater discharges. (�) All new residential, commercial, industrial and other habitable or non -habitable structures must be constructed so that the lowest floor elevations are a minimum of two feet above the critical event 100 -year high water elevation and are one foot above the overflow elevation of nearby surface waterbodies wetlands and stormwater basins. Within landlocked basins, lowest floor elevations must be at least one foot above the surveyed basin overflow elevation. (k) Development resulting in the creation of impervious surfaces must explicitly address use of best management practices (BMPs) to first limit the loss of pervious area; and second, to infiltrate runoff which does occur from impervious areas to the extent feasible considering site-specific conditions. BMPs include the use of vegetated swales, pond outlets perched above groundwater levels, use of infiltration systems, roof drainage to pervious areas, minimum of twenty percent pervious surface, use of depressed/casual storage areas, and minimization of the number and width of parking stalls and use of deep-rooted native vegetation, and narrower "rural section" roads. The goal of these BMPs is to incorporate practices into the design which are capable of infiltrating the impervious surface runoff from the Mpls-St.Paul median storm (0.34 inches) in seventy-two hours. Infiltration volume will be calculated using the appropriate hydrologic soil group classification and saturated infiltration rate from the table below. Hydrologic Infiltration Soil Group Rate Soil Textures A 0.50 in/hr sand, loamy sand, or sandy loam B 0.25 in/hr silt loam or loam C 0.10 in/hr sandy clay loam D 0.03 in/hrclay loam, silty clay loam, silty clay, or clay Source: Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, SCS, June 1986. Infiltration area will be limited to the horizontal areas subject to prolonged wetting. Areas of permanent pools tend to lose infiltration capacity over time and will not be accepted as an infiltration practice. a (1) Landlocked basins may be provided with outlets only if they: o (1) Retain a hydrologic regime which complies with District Wetland Alteration Rule F. o (2) Provide sufficient dead storage volume to retain back-to-back 100 -year, twenty -four-hour rainfalls and runoff. o (3) Do not create adverse downstream flooding or water duality conditions as a result of increased discharge rate or volume, or other factors. (m) All stormwater management structures and facilities must be properly maintained in perpetuity to assure that they continue to function as originally designed. This maintenance responsibility must be assumed either by the municipalitya€TMs accepting the required easements dedicated to stormwater management purposes, or by the applicant executing and recording a maintenance agreement acceptable to the District. 4. Required Exhibits. The following exhibits must accompany the permit application. One set, full size; two sets, reduced to maximum size of I 1 "x 17". H . (a) Property lines and delineation of lands under ownership of the applicant. http://www.ricecreekwd.com/rules/rcwd/c 11/1"312(006 Rule C: Storm -Water Management Plans I Rice Creek Watershed District Page 3 of 4 • (b) Delineation of the subwatershed contributing runoff from off-site, proposed and existing subwatersheds on-site, emergency overflows, and drainageways. • (c) Proposed and existing stormwater facilities location, alignment and elevation. • (d) Delineation of existing on-site wetland, marshes, shoreland and/or floodplain areas. • (e) Identification of existing and proposed normal, and ordinary high and 100 -year water elevations on-site. • (f) Identification of existing and proposed site contour elevations related to NGVD, 1929 datum. • (g) Construction plans and specifications of all proposed stormwater management facilities, including design details for outlet control structures. • (h) Stormwater runoff volume and rate analyses for the one and 100 -year critical events, existing and proposed conditions. • (i) All hydrologic, water quality, and hydraulic computations completed to design the proposed stormwater management facilities. • 0) Narrative addressing incorporation of infiltration BMPs. • (k) Delineation of any ponding or flowage easements or other property interest dedicated to stormwater management purposes. 5. Platting Or Easement Documents. Applicant must provide platting or easement documents showing sufficient drainage and ponding/flowage easements over hydrologic features such as floodplains, storm sewers, ponds, ditches, swales, wetlands and waterways. Structures and facilities subject to flood damage built within the 100 -year flood will have two feet of freeboard between the lowest floor and the 100 -year flood profile. 6. Exceptions. • (a) Rule C and its requirements will not apply to development or redevelopment of individual sites less than 2.5 acres in size for industrial, commercial, and multi -unit residential, and less than five acres in size for single-family residential, unless such development or redevelopment: o (1) Is within the 100 -year floodplain. o (2) Is within 1,000 feet of a public water or protected wetland. o (3) Is within 300 feet of Rice Creek, Clearwater Creek, Hardwood Creek, or of a public ditch. • (b) Rule C and its requirements will not apply to construction of single-family detached dwelling on an isolated lot, unless such dwelling: o (1) Is within the 100 -year floodplain. o (2) Is within 1,000 feet of a public water or protected wetland. o (3) Is within 300 feet of Rice Creek, Clearwater Creek, Hardwood Creek, or of a public ditch. • (c) Rule C and its requirements will not apply to construction on individual lots within a residential subdivision approved by the District, unless the activity does not comply with the original development plan or has been superseded by state law. • (d) The requirements of paragraph (f) of Section 3 will be modified for redevelopment sites at which less than fifty -percent of the total site area (including any road right-of-way) will be disturbed, such that water quality ponding will be required only for the areas being disturbed. • (e) Subdivision of land which does not propose construction of impervious surfaces or structures will be exempt from the requirements of Section 3 and paragraphs (c), (g), (h), (i) of Section 4. However, a Rule C permit is required when such future development does occur. • (f) Rate control criteria discussed in Section 3 may be waived if the site discharges directly to a water body with large storage capacity (such as a public water) which has a time-to-peak elevation greater than that for an on-site pond and the volume discharged from the on-site pond is negligible, relative to the volume of runoff entering the waterbody. • (g) The requirements of paragraphs (e) and (f) of Section 3 may be waived for sites with total impervious area of less than one acre, if infiltration BMPs have been incorporated into the project to the maximum extent possible. • (h) The requirements of paragraph 0) of Section 3 may be waived for short -duration floods not associated with regulatory (FEMA -FIS) floodplain. Low floor elevations will not be allowed below the 100 -year water level, and the two -foot freeboard requirement would apply to the minimum building opening elevation. Additionally, applicant must submit calculations demonstrating the duration of the flood event was sufficiently brief to prevent saturation of the soil at the low floor. http://www.ricecreekwd.com/Hiles/rcwd/c 11/13/2006 Rule C: Storm -Water Management Plans I Rice Creek Watershed District Page 4 of 4 • (i) In cases where structures are proposed below the runout elevation of land -locked basins, the low -floor elevation will be a minimum of two feet above the high water level as determined from an estimate of highwater levels determined from the highest of either the 100 -year, ten-day runoff event or back-to-back 100 -year, twenty -four- hour rainfalls. Aerial photos, vegetation, soils, and topography will be used to derive a normal water elevation for the basin for purposes of computing the 100 -year elevation. < Rule B: Permit Procedural Requirements up Rule D: Erosion Control Plans > printer -friendly version Rice Creek Watershed District 4325 Pheasant Ridge Drive, Suite 611 Blaine, Minnesota, 55449-4539 Phone: (763) 398-3070 / Fax: (763)398-3088 Copyright 2002-2006 About this website http://www.ricecreekwd.corn/rules/rcwd/c 11/13/2006 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)/State Disposal System (SDS) PLEASE SUBMIT TO: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Construction Stormwater Permit Program 520 Lafayette Road North, St. Paul, MN 55155-4194 AlPCJ usemill- F.X111:, Chem r{ PLEASE READ: This form is for new permit applications only. Use the Transfer/Modification form to transfer a permit to one party or the Subdivision Registration form for multiple parties. All forms are available at the MPCA's Construction Stormwater Web site: www.pca.state.Mn.us/water/stormwater/stormwater-c.litml. Please refer to the application instructions and the NPDES/SDS General Stormwater Permit for Construction Activity (MN R10000 I) as you complete this form. Brackets `[ ]' refer to the Stormwater Permit, which is included with this application. Call the MPGA Customer Assistance Center at 651-297-2274 or 800-646-6247 (in Minnesota) for assistance. 1 Are you ready to apply? -- 1. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) a. Has a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been developed for this project and incorporated ❑Yes [:]No into the project's plans and specifications? [see attached General Stormwater Permit Part IIIA] b. Are erosion prevention measures addressed in the SWPPP'? [Part IV.B] ❑Yes ❑No c. Are sediment control measures addressed in the SWPPP? [Part IV.C] ❑Yes ❑No d. Are dewatering and basin draining addressed in the SWPPP? [Part IV.D] ❑Yes ❑No c. Are inspections and maintenance addressed in the SWPPP? [Part IV.E] ❑Yes [:]No f. Are pollution prevention management measures addressed in the SWPPP? [Part IV.F] ❑Yes [:]No g. Is final stabilization addressed in the SWPPP'? [Part IV.G] ❑Yes ❑No h. If an environmental review was required, did you incorporate all stormwater related mitigation ❑Yes []No [:INA measures contained in the review into the SWPPP? STOP if you responded No to any question above. A SWPPP must be developed prior to submitting a permit application. Complete the above requirements and check Yes before submitting this application. Continue if you responded Yes or NA to all questions above. 2. Discharges to Special Waters a. Are all stormwater discharges that may flow from the project to a Special Water that is located []Yes ❑No [INA within 2,000 feet of any project discharge points addressed in the SWPPP to meet the permit conditions in Appendix A, Part A -C? STOP if you responded No, Complete the above requirements and check Yes before submitting this application. Continue if you responded Yes. 3. Additional Application Review a. Will the project include alternative treatment methods? [Part 11LC.5] if yes, this application and the ❑Yes ❑No alternative treatment plans must be submitted a minimum of 90 days before construction starts. b. if yes, are the plans attached? ❑Yes ❑No c. Will the project disturb 50 acres? AND Is there a discharge point within 2000 feet of an impaired or ❑Yes [:]No special water whose discharge may reach an impaired or special water listed in Appendix A of the permit? [Part 11.B.1.b] If yes, this application and the SWPPP must be submitted a mininuun of 30 days before construction starts. d. if yes, is the SWPPP attached? ❑Yes ❑No 4. Application Fee Is the required S400 Application Fee (payable to the MPGA) enclosed? ❑Yes wq-slrm?-57 I of 3 Revised 4/06 Construction Activity Information 5. Project Name 6. Project Location Briefly describe where constrtic tion acIit i I y occurs - Example: Intersection of,imh Street and Iii ine Avenue. /nchicle uddr ess i/'uruiluhle MN City or Township Slate Zip Code County Parcel ID h +Mach list i� a c ca'surr All cities taficrc consn'uclion Will occur All counties where construction will occur 7. Project Size Number of acres to be disturbed All townships where COnSiftIC6011 will occur 8. Project Map Is the required 8 '/i x 1 1" United States Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5 minute quad or []Yes equivalent map indicating site boundaries attached'? 9. Project Type ❑ Residential ❑Commercial/Industrial ❑ Road Construction ❑ Other 10. Cumulative Impervious Surface 11. Permanent Stormwater Management 12. Receiving Waters a. Existing area of impervious surface (to the nearest quarter acre) b. Post construction area of impervious surface (to the nearest quarter acre) If new impervious surface created by the project is less than one acre, skip to question 12. What types (check all that apply) of permanent stormwater management will be used if more than one acre of new impervious surface is created by the project? [Part 111. Q ❑ Wet Sedimentation Basin ❑ Infiltration/Filtration ❑ Regional Ponding ❑ Alternative Methods (Ifusing allernotive methods, construction cannot Commence until receiving approval from the MPCA.) ❑ Other (Specily reason and list other treatment allowed by Part III, C') Identify surface waters within '/ mile of project boundary that will receive storm water from the site or discharge from permanent Stonnwater management system. Include waters shown on USGS 7.5 minute quad or equivalent, all Special Waters identified in Appendix A of the permit and/or any impaired waters (To find Special or Impaired Waters, use the Special and Impaired Waters Search tool at www.pea.state.iinn.us/water/stormwater/stormwater-c.litml). Use additional paper if necessary. Name of Water Body Type (ditch. pond. %vetland, lake. steam. river) Special Water? (See stormwater Permit Appendix A) Impaired Water? ❑Yes ❑No ❑Yes [-]No ❑Yes [:]No ❑Yes ❑No ❑Yes ❑No [-]Yes ❑No ❑Yes []No ❑Yes ❑No 13. Dates of Construction / / a. Consu-uction Start Date b. Estimated Completion Date wti-strm2-57 2 of3 Revised 4/06 This form will not be accepted if the Owner and Contractor contact information sections, below, are BOTH not completed and signed. If the owner is also the contractor, or a contractor hasn't yet been selected, the owner must also fill out the contractor information section and sign again. Responsible Patties 14. Owner BOTH PARTIES MUST SIGN Business or Firm Name Fcderal Tax ID State Tax ID - ext. Last Name First Namc Title 1 -mail Telephone (include urea coele) Mailing Address City Slate Zip Code - ext. Last Name (Alternate Contact) First Name F -mail Telephone lim-lade urea rode) I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted, Based on my inquiry ofthe person or persons who manage this system, or the persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information is, to the best ofmy knowledge and belief, true, accurate and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. I also certify under penalty of law that I have read, understood, and accepted all terms and conditions of the NPDES/SDS General Stormwater Permit Construction Activity (MN R100001) that authorizes stormwater discharges associated with the consn-uction site identified on this form. Authorized Signature Dale This Application must be signed hr: • Corporation: a principal e.tccurire ul/icer q/ ul /caul the level of I-ic e -president or the chi 1.1, aulhori_ed representative or agent q/'Ihe e.ccculi%u omcer it"the represenrarive or agent is responsible %or the overall operurion of the itc ililr than is the sul?ject gfrhe permit application, • Partnership or Sole Proprietorship: a general partner or the proprietor: • A•lanic•ipaliq', State, Federal or Other Public Agency: principal exec alive officer or ranking clected official. 15. Contractor Business or Firm Name Federal Tax ID Stale Tax ID - ext Last Name First Name Title 12 -mail Telephone (include arca code) Mailing Address City Slate Zip Code - ext. Last Name (Alternate Contact) First Name E-mail Telephone (include area code) I certify under penalty of' law that this document and all attachments were prepared reader my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that gLlalilicd personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage this system, or the persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information is, to the best ofmy knowledge and belief, tree, accurate and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of line and imprisonment for knowing violations. 1 also certify under penalty of law that I have read, understood, and accepted all terms and conditions of the NPDES/SDS General Stormwater Permit for Constnrction Activity (MN RI00001) that authorizes stormwater discharges associated with the construction site identified on this form. x Authorized Signature Date This �l ppliralion must be.rigned by • Carpnrrrlion: a prinripul evcrurn e r %/icer ./al least rhe lyre! r/1 is c -pr^c. ideal or rhe dolt aulhori-cd reps c. emuli rc or agent of the c recrrtire officer if the represenlali ve or agent is responsihlrJbr the overall operation u(theJirrilin• thou is rhe subjec•I ofrhe permit application. • Partnership or Sole Proprietorship: o general partner or [lie proprielolc • M n kipality, Stale, Federol or Other Puhlit- A enrr: principal e.tccutivc af/irer or ranking elected official. wq-strm2-57 3 of 3 Re\ ised 4/06 This Page Left Intentionally Blank wq-slrm2-53 Revised 11/06 Minnesota P011LItion Control Agency �� PrnCe.�i.iktj i��liitrte�rlit',� Lrri}iri..rttlt�Jat i:ii4t� ��t4iilJt� L`� L.I�I: APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS for MINNESOTA'S NPDES/SDS GENERAL STORMWATER PERMIT for CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY Submission of an application is notice that the owner and general contractor identified on the application intend to be authorized by an NPDES/SDS permit issued for Stormwater discharges associated with a construction activity in the State of Minnesota. For Questions 1-3, please refer to the NPDES/SDS General Stormwater Permit for Construction Activity and the Flowchart at the end of these instructions. I . Indicate if a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) has been prepared and the appropriate sections (a through h of this question) have been addressed by answering "Yes" or "No". A SWPPP is a plan for Stormwater discharge that includes erosion prevention measures and sediment controls that, when implemented, will decrease soil erosion on a parcel of land and decrease pollution in receiving waters. This plan must be developed prior to submitting a permit application. A sample plan and development tools are available on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency web page at httu://cfpub l.epa.,gov/nudes/stormwater/swppp.cfm For section "'h" indicate if an Environmental Review has been completed if required, by answering "Yes" or "No" or "NA". Environmental review looks at how a proposed project could potentially affect the environment and looks at ways to avoid or minimize impacts before the project is permitted and built. Examples of categories that may need an environmental review include residential development; industrial, commercial, and institutional facilities; and also highway projects. For certain projects, environmental review is mandatory. For more details see the Guide lo Nlinnesola Envirownewal Re viei-r Rules, Chapter 6. This can be found at http://www.mnplan.state.mn.us/pdf/rull-Xuid3.pdf 2. Indicate if discharges to special waters have been identified and addressed by answering "Yes" or "No" or "NA" (not applicable) on the Permit Application. The questions at the right can help in making this determination. Special waters have qualities that warrant extra protection. A list of these special water categories can be found in Appendix A of the permit. For information on special waters near the project's area, see the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPGA) Web page at http://www.pca.state.Mn.us/publications/wq-strm 1-05.xls Special Waters 2.a. Do you have a `special water' that is within 2,000 feet of the project? (see Appendix A of the Permil for a list ofthese special water calegories) 2.b. Do you have stormwater discharges that are within 2,000 feet of these special waters? 2.c. Will the discharges identified in 2.b. flow to the special waters? wq-strm2-58 Rmsed 11/06 3. Indicate by answering "Yes" or "No" whether the project will include alternative methods for the permanent Stormwater management system or will disturb 50 acres or more and have a discharge point (including sheet flow) that is within 2000 feet of and flows to an impaired or special water. Additional review from the MPGA is required in these cases. Yon have the option of proposing an alternative, innovative, permanent Stormwater management system. YOU must send in the permit application and the additional required information (see Part 111,0.5 of the Permit) at least 90 days prior to the start of construction if you choose this approach. You must receive an approval letter from [lie MPCA for this method before beginning construction. The application and SWPPP need to be submitted to the IVIPCA a minimum of 30 clays prior to the start of construction if the project disturbs 50 acres or more and drains to an impaired water or a special water listed in Appendix A of the permit. For a list and maps of impaired waters in MN go to www.pca.state.mn.us/water/trndl.html 4. The application requires a S400 application fee. Indicate that the application fee has been enclosed by answering ""yes" Please make checks payable to: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and submit the check with the completed application to: MPCA, Regional Environmental Management Division, 520 Lafayette Road North, St. Paul, MN 55155- 4194. Applications received without the required fee will be returned to the sender. 5. List the construction project's name. If the project does not have a name, list the type of project and a brief description (for example, "I -35E/1-494 Interchange" or "Highway 169 bridge replacement (#79605) at the Rum River"). 6. Provide an address (if available) and brief description of the construction activity's location (for example, "North West Corner of the Intersection of 45"' Street and Irving Avenue, Minneapolis, MN-). List the County Parcel ID# for the project if it is known. If there are multiple numbers within the project, attach a list. Parcel identification Numbers are unique numbers assigned by the County. Listing the County Parcel 1D4 is not required if not available (for example, highway projects) Provide the names of all Cities, counties, and townships the construction activity takes place in (for example, a roadway may cross county, city, or township boundaries). 7. List, in acres, the amount of area to be disturbed for this project. 8. Attach the required map and indicate that it is included with the permit application. United States Geological Survey (USGS) 7,5 -minute quad maps or equivalent maps may be used. USGS 7.5 -minute quad maps may be ordered at http://store.usQS.gov/ 9. Indicate the type of construction activity by checking the appropriate box. Please describe the project if you check "Other". 10. Indicate to the nearest quarter acre, the existing and resulting areas of impervious surfaces. Impervious surface means a constructed hard surface that either prevents or retards the entry of water into the soil and causes water to run off the surface in greater quantities and at an increased rate of flow than prior to development. Examples include rooftops, sidewalks, patios, driveways, parking lots, storage areas, and concrete, asphalt, or gravel roads. (a.) "Existing" area means the area of impervious surface that is present prior to the start of this construction project. (b.) "Post construction" means the entire area of impervious surface after construction is completed. Subtract (a.) from (b.) to determine the area of new impervious swrface. 1 I. For projects creating one or more acres of cumulative new impervious surfaces, check the appropriate box to indicate which type(s) of permanent Stormw2ter management practices that will be used. The "Other" box is limited to those situations (such as proximity to bedrock) that are described in Part I11.0 of the permit. See the permit for a further description. 1f the "Other' box is checked, describe which situation outlined in Part 111. C. tits the project and what other permanent treatment (such as grassed swales, smaller ponds and/or grit chambers) will be used on the project. 12. BRIEFLY describe which waterbody(s) will receive Stormwater runoff from the construction site or from the discharge from permanent Stormwater management systems by completing the table. To determine which waterbody(s) will wq-strm2-58 Revised 1 P06 receive StormWatel' runoff discharges, make a brief sLn-vey of the project's surrounding area. Include the waters identified on a USGS 7.5 -minute quad or equivalent map. See Appendix A of this permit to determine if a water body is a special water. To find special or impaired waters, use the Special and Impaired Waters Search tool at: www.pca.state.nul.us/water/stormwater/stormwater-c.html. 13. List the start and estimated completion dates of the construction project (for example, 9/18/05), Responsible Parties 14. Owner information: Provide the information requested of the owner of the company, organization, or other entity for Which this conSIRIC6011 project is being done. The Owner means the person or party possessing the title of the land on which the construction activities will occur; or if the construction activity is for a lease holder, the party or individual identified as the lease holder; or the contracting government agency responsible for the construction activity. The owner is the party responsible for the compliance with all terms and conditions of the permit. The alternate contact should be the owner's representative in charge of the project (for example, Sandy Smith, Inspector; Joe Johnson, Project Manager; etc). After completing this application, certify it with a signature and date fi-om an individual authorized to sign the application. This application form must be signed by either a principal executive officer, vice president, representative agent responsible for overall operations, general partner, or a proprietor. If the activity is being conducted by a unit of government (state, county, municipality, or township), this application must be signed by a principal executive officer or ranking elected official (for example, city or county engineer, administrator, or manager; director of public works; mayor, etc.) For additional information, see Minnesota Rules 7001.0060. 15, Contractor (Operator) Information. Provide the information requested of the contractor. The Contractor means the party who signs the construction contract with the owner to construct the project described in the final plans and specifications. Where the construction project involves more than one contractor, the general contractor will be the party responsible for managing the project on behalf of the owner. In some cases the owner may be the general contractor. In these cases, the owner may contract an individual as the operator who would be the co -permittee. The operator (usually the general contractor) is jointly responsible with the owner for compliance with part i1.B., part II.C., and part iV of the permit. After this application has been completed by the owner, the contractor must certify it with a signature and date from an individual authorized to sign the form. The application must be signed by either a principal executive officer, vice president, representative agent responsible for overall operations, general partner, or a proprietor. If the general contractor is a unit of government (state, county, nurnicipality, or township), this application must be signed by a principal executive officer, ranking elected official, administrator, manager, coordinator, or engineer. (For additional information, see Minnesota Rules 7001.0060.) The alternate contact should be the contractor's representative in charge of the project (for example, Scott Marshall, Head Foreman; Ann Johnson, Project Manager, etc.). Send the completed application and fee to: MPGA Regional Environmental Management Division 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155-4194 Onestions? Contact the N1PC4 Customer Assistance Center at (800) 646-6247 or (651) 197-1174. For businesses frith Rice r than 100 emplolves, content the A11PCA Small Business assistance Program at (800) 657-3938. \vq-s1mi2-58 Revised 11/06 1Owner develops aStorm-water Pollution r—= � projects final j � lit; Includes identifying a Includes determining if Environmc 1-_J7)0( ■ Applicants still need to seek approval through required permitting process at the local, state, and federal levels. wq-strm2-58 there authorit apprc Submit plana Authority fc Revised 11/0 Has thi Auft Page 1 of 26 Permit No: MN R100001 GENERAL PERMIT AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE STORM WATER ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM/STATE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT PROGRAM ISSUANCE DATE: August 1, 2003 EXPIRATION DATE: August 1, 2008 In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act, as amended, (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.; hereinafter, the "Act"), 40 CFR 122, 123, and 124, as amended, et seq.; Minn. Stat. Chs. 115 and 116, as amended, and Minn. R. Ch. 7001: This permit regulates the discharges of storm water to the waters of the state of Minnesota associated with construction activity. This permit covers the storm water discharges identified in Part I.A. of this permit. The limitations on permit coverage are identified in Part I.B. of this permit. This permit requires the development and implementation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). No person shall commence construction activity covered by Part I.A. until permit coverage under this permit is effective or, if applicable, until the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) has issued an individual NPDES/SDS construction storm water permit for the project. The SWPPP must be completed prior to submitting any permit application and prior to conducting any construction activity by any required Permittee. Unless notified by the MPCA to the contrary, applicants who submit a completed application (including permit fee) in accordance with the requirements of this permit are authorized to discharge storm water from construction sites under the terms and conditions of this permit 7, 30, or 90 days after the postmarked date of the completed application as described in Part II.B. Umerage under this permit NNiII remain in effect until the owner has submitted a Notice of Termination. rriardles� utthc aho�e expiration da w- Nfinnesota Pollution Control Agency If you have questions on this permit, including the specific permit requirements, permit reporting or permit compliance status, please contact the appropriate MPCA offices. wq-strm2-51 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Construction Storm Water Program 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155-4194 Telephone (651) 297-2274 All boldfaced terms are defined in "Definitions, "Pages 13 through 16 TDD (for hearing and speech impaired only): (651)182-5331 Made from over 50% recycled fiber including 10% post consumer waste Page 2 of 26 Permit No: MN 1100001 Table of Contents Page I. PERMIT COVERAGE AND LIMITATIONS..................................................................3 A. Permit Coverage........................................................................................................... 3 B. Limitations of Coverage ............................................................................................... 3 II. SUBMITTING THE APPLICATION.................................................................................4 A. Prerequisite for Submitting a Permit Application........................................................ 4 B. Application and Duration of Coverage......................................................................... 4 C. Termination of Coverage.............................................................................................. 6 III. STORM WATER DISCHARGE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS......................................7 A. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan....................................................................... 7 B. Temporary Sediment Basins........................................................................................ 9 C. Permanent Storm Water Management System........................................................... 10 D. Record Retention........................................................................................................ 13 IV. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REQUIREMENTS......................................................13 A. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan..................................................................... 13 B. Erosion Prevention Practices...................................................................................... 13 C. Sediment Control Practices........................................................................................ 14 D. Dewatering and Basin Draining................................................................................. 15 E. Inspections and Maintenance..................................................................................... 15 F. Pollution Prevention Management Measures............................................................. 17 G. Final Stabilization....................................................................................................... 17 V. GENERAL PROVISIONS................................................................................................ 18 A. Applicability Criteria.................................................................................................. 18 B. Response.....................................................................................................................18 C. Prohibitions................................................................................................................ 18 D. Transfer of Ownership or Control.............................................................................. 18 E. Civil and Criminal Liability....................................................................................... 18 VSeverability.................................................................................................................19 G. NPDES/SDS Rule Standard Conditions..................................................................... 19 H. Inspection and Entry ................................................................................................... 19 APPENDIXA ........................................................... .,...................... ,........................................... 19 APPENDIX B - DEFINITIONS................................................................................................. 23 wq-strm2-51 Page 3 of 26 Permit No: MN R 10000 1 PART Io PERMIT COVERAGE AND LIMITATIONS A. PERMIT COVERAGE 1. This permit is required for storm water discharges associated with construction activity and with small construction activity as defined in 40 C.F.R. part 122.26(b)(14)(x) and (b)(15), respectively. 2. This permit authorizes, subject to the terms and conditions of this permit, the discharge of storm water associated with construction activity and small construction activity. Construction activity includes clearing, grading and excavation, that disturbs land of equal to or greater than five (5) acres and includes the disturbance of less than file (5) acres of total land area that is a part of a larger common plan of development or sale if the larger common plan will ultimately disturb five (5) acres or more. Small construction activity includes clearing, grading and excavation, that disturbs land of equal to or greater than one (1) acre, and includes the disturbance of less than one (I ) acre of total land area that is part of a larger common plan of development or sale if the larger common plan will ultimately disturb equal to or greater than one and less than five (5) acres. Small construction activity does not include routine maintenance that is performed to maintain the original line and grade, hydraulic capacity, or original purpose of the facility. 3. This permit covers all areas of the state of Minnesota. 4. For Parts 1.13 through Appendix A of this permit, all reference to construction activity includes both small construction activity and construction activity. B. LIMITATIONS OF COVERAGE This permit does not cover the following activities: 1. Discharges or releases that are not storm water except those non -storm water discharges authorized under Part IV.D. 2. The placement of fill into waters of the state requiring local, state, or federal authorizations (such as U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 pennits, Department of Natural Resources Public Waters Work Permits or Local Governmental Unit Wetland Conservation Act replacement plans or determinations). 3. Storm water discharges associated with industrial activity that originate from the site after construction activities have been completed and the site has undergone final stabilization. Post - construction industrial storm water discharges may need to be covered by a separate NPDES/SDS permit. 4. Non -point source agricultural and silvicultural discharges excluded from NPDES permit requirements under 40 CFR part 122.3(e). 5. Discharges to the waters identified below unless the requirements of Appendix A. are complied with: wq-strm2-51 Page 4 of 26 Permit No: MN R100001 a. Discharges into outstanding resource value waters (ORVWs) as defined in Minn. R. 7050.0180, subp. 3 and 6, except calcareous fens listed in Minn. R. 7050.0180, subp. 6.b. b. Discharges into Trout waters as listed in Minn. R. 6264.0050, subp. 2 and 4. c. Discharges into Wetlands as listed in Minn. R. 7050.0130, item. F. d. Discharges from projects that have not met applicable Environmental Review requirements under state or federal laws. e. Discharges that adversely impact or contribute to adverse impacts on a listed endangered or threatened species or adversely modify a designated critical habitat. f. Discharges which adversely affect properties listed or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places or affecting known or discovered archeological sites. 6. Discharges to calcareous fens listed in Minn. R. 7050.0180, subp. 6.b. Discharges to waters for which there is a total maximum daily load (TMDL) allocation for sediment and parameters associated with sediment transport are not eligible for coverage under this permit unless the Permittee(s) develop and certify a SWPPP that is consistent with the assumptions, allocations and requirements in the approved TMDL. To be eligible for coverage under this general permit, Permittee(s) must incorporate into their SWPPP any conditions applicable to their discharges necessary for consistency with the assumptions, allocations and -- requirements of the TMDL within any timeframes established in the TMDL. The SWPPP must include the provisions in Part III.A.7. If a specific numeric wasteload allocation has been established that would apply to the project's discharges, the Permittee(s) must incorporate that allocation into its SWPPP and implement necessary steps to meet that allocation. PART II. SUBMITTING THE APPLICATION A. PREREQUISITE FOR SUBMITTING A PERMIT APPLICATION The owner must develop a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) in accordance with Part III (Storm Water Discharge Design Requirements) of this permit. The plans are not to be submitted to the MPCA (unless the project size is 50 acres or more and will discharge to certain waters as described in Part II.B.I .b.) but are to be retained by the owner in accordance with Part IIID (Record Retention). The applicants' failure to complete the SWPPP prior to submitting the application will result in the application being returned and the storm water discharges associated with construction activity will not be authorized by this permit. B. APPLICATION AND DURATION OF COVERAGE 1. Application Required. a. The owner and operator shall submit a completed application form (or a photocopy thereof) with the appropriate fee for project size (see application form) to the MPCA for each project which disturbs one (1) or more acres of land. The owner and operator of a common plan wq-strm2-51 Page 5 of 26 Permit No: MN R 100001 of development or sale that will ultimately disturb one (l) or more acres must submit a completed application to the MPCA. b. For certain projects or common plans of development or sale disturbing 50 acres or more, the application must be submitted at least 30 days before the start of construction activity. This requirement pertains to projects that have a discharge point on the project that is within 2000 feet of, and flows to, a special water listed in Appendix A, Part B. or waters listed as impaired under section 303(d) of the federal Clean Water Act (see MPCA's web site). Applicants must submit a completed application form and Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan including all calculations for the Permanent Storm Water Management System (see Part III.A — Q. The Owner and Operator are Permittee(s). The owner who signs the application is a Permittee and is responsible for compliance with all terms and conditions of this permit. The operator (usually the general contractor) who signs the application is a Permittee for Parts I1.B., Part II.C. and Part IV. of this permit and is jointly responsible with the owner for compliance with those portions of the permit. 3. Permit Coverage. The commencement of any construction activity (e.g., land disturbing activities) covered under Part I.A. of this permit is prohibited until permit coverage under this permit is effective or, if applicable, until the MPCA has issued an individual NPDES/SDS construction storm water permit for the project. a. Except as provided in subp. 3.b. and 3.c. below, permit coverage will become effective seven 7 days after the postmarked date of the completed application form. For projects disturbing 50 acres or more, that have a discharge point on the project that is within 2000 feet of, and flows to, a special water listed in Appendix A, Part B. or waters listed as impaired under section 303(d) of the federal Clean Water Act, the applicants must submit a completed application and SWPPP to the MPCA at least thirty (30) days prior to the commencement of construction activities. MPCA staff will review the SWPPP submitted with the completed application and unless the Permittee is notified in writing that the SWPPP does not meet the general permit requirements, permit coverage will become effective 30 days after the postmarked date or MPCA date -stamp (whichever is first) of the completed application. c. For proposals to use Alternative Method(s) for the Permanent Storm Water Management System under Part III.C.5, the applicants must submit a completed application and SWPPP, including the Alternative Method documentation under Part III.C.5, to MPCA for review and approval at least 90 days prior to the proposed starting date of construction activity. i. The MPCA will notify the applicant within the 90 -day period, in writing, whether the alternative method is approved or not approved and, if applicable, the basis for denial. ii. The applicant may re -submit the alternative method after addressing the MPCA's basis for denial. The MPCA will respond within 30 days. Ili. Permit coverage will become effective upon receipt of an alternative treatment method approval letter from MPCA. Any construction activity on the project is not covered under this permit until receiving the alternative treatment approval letter. wq-strm2-5 I Page 6 of .26 Permit No: NlN 8100001 4. Coverage Letter. For projects under subpart 3.a. of this part, the Perm. Wee(s) will receive a permit letter and certificate acknowledging perrnit coverage, usually within 30 days of the postmarked date of the completed application. Change of Coverage. For storm water discharges from construction projects where the owner or operator changes, (e.g., an original developer sells portions of the property to various homebuilders) the new owner or operator must submit a subdivision registration within 7 days of assuming operational control of the site, commencing work on their portion of the site, or of the legal transfer, sale or closing on the property. For instances where an owner or operator of an entire project changes after an application has been submitted under Part 11, the new owner or operator must submit an application for permit transfer/modification within 7 days of assuming control of the site or commencing work on-site, or of the legal transfer, sale or closing on the property. Late submittals will not be rejected; however, the MPCA reserves the right to take enforcement for any unpermitted discharges or permit noncompliance for the new registered party that has assumed control of the site. For storm water discharges from construction activities where the owner or operator changes, the new owner or operator can implement the original SWPPP created for the project or develop and implement their own SWPPP. Permittee(s) shall ensure either directly or through coordination with other Permittee(s) that their SWPPP meets all terms and conditions of this permit and that their activities do not render another party's erosion prevention and sediment control Best Management Practices (BMPs)." C. TERMINATION OF COVERAGE 1. Permittee(s) wishing to terminate coverage under this permit must submit a Notice of Termination (NOT) to the MPCA. Compliance with this permit is required instil a NOT is submitted. The Permittee(s) authorization to discharge under this permit terminates at midnight of the day the NOT is signed. 2. All Permittee(s) must submit a NOT within thirty (30) days after one or more of the following conditions have been met: a. Final stabilization (see Part W.G. and definition in Appendix B ) has been achieved on all portions of the site for which the Permittee is responsible (including the removal of all temporary measures such as silt fence, and if applicable, returning agricultural land to its pre - construction agricultural use); b. Another owner/operator (Permittee) has assumed control according to Part II.B.5 over all areas of the site that have not been finally stabilized; or c. For residential construction only, temporary erosion protection and clown gradient perimeter control for individual lots has been completed and the residence has been transferred to the homeowner. Additionally, the Permittee must distribute the MPCA's "homeowner factsheet" to the homeowner to inform the homeowner of the need for, and benefits of, final stabilization. 3. Permittee(s) that use an alternative method for the permanent storm water management system as described in Part III.C.5, are prohibited from terminating this permit until final stabilization has been achieved on site and either: wq-strm2-5 I Page 7 of 26 Permit No: MN R 100001 a) The two years of monitoring data has been submitted to the MPCA and the MPCA has determined that the required treatment has been achieved. The Permittee will be notified in writing within 30 days after the monitoring data has been submitted. If the Permittee has not heard from the MPCA within 30 days after submitting the required data, the Permittee can submit a Notice of Termination. b) The Permittee can submit a Notice of Termination, even if the timeframe is less than two years, if the MPCA determines that the alternative method is achieving the required treatment. During the monitoring and evaluation of the alternative method, the Permittee is not responsible for other permit requirements that have been transferred as described in Part II.13.5. PART III. STORM WATER DISCHARGE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS A. STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN The owner must develop a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The SWPPP shall be completed prior to submitting any permit application and prior to conducting any construction activity by any required Permittee(s). The plan must be a combination of narrative, plan sheets and if appropriate standard detail sheets that address the foreseeable conditions, at any stage in the construction or post construction activities. The plan must include a description of the nature of the construction activity. The plan must address the potential for discharge of sediment and/or other potential pollutants from the site. For storm water discharges from construction activities where the owner or operator changes, the new owner or operator can implement the original SWPPP created for the project or develop and implement their own SWPPP. Permittee(s) shall ensure either directly or through coordination with other Permittee(s) that their SWPPP meets all terms and conditions of this permit and that their activities do not render another party's erosion prevention and sediment control Best Management Practices (BMPs) ineffective. As part of the SWPPP the owner must identify a person knowledgeable and experienced in the application of erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs who will oversee the implementation of the SWPPP, and the installation, inspection and maintenance of the erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs before and during construction. The owner must identify who will have the responsibility for long term operation and maintenance of the permanent storm water management system (see Part III.C.). The owner shall develop a chain of responsibility with all operators on the site to ensure that the SWPPP will be implemented and stay in effect until the construction project is complete, the entire site has undergone final stabilization, and a NOT has been submitted to the MPCA. The SWPPP must incorporate the requirements of Part III (Storm Water Discharge Design Requirements), Part IV (Construction Activity Requirements) and Appendix A for the project. A narrative describing the timing for installation of all erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs required in Part III, Part IV and Appendix A must also be included in the plan. 3. The SWPPP requirements must be incorporated into the project's final plans and specifications and/or project documentation, as appropriate, and must include: a. Location and type of all temporary and permanent erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs along with procedures to be used to establish additional temporary BMPs as necessary wq-strm2-51 Page 8 of ?b Permit No: NI Ni R 100001 for the site conditions during construction. Standard plates and/or specifications for the BNIPs used on the project must be included in the final plans and specifications for the project. b. A site map with existing and final grades, including dividing .lines and direction of flow for all pre and post -construction storm water runoff drainage areas located within the project limits. The site map must also include impervious surfaces and soil types. c. Locations of areas not to be disturbed. d. Location of areas where construction will be phased to minimize duration of exposed soil areas. All surface waters and existing wetlands, which can be identified on maps such as United States Geological Survey 7.5 minute quadrangle maps or equivalent maps within one-half mile from the project boundaries, which will receive storm water runoff from the construction site, during or after construction. Where surface waters receiving runoff associated with construction activity will not fit on the plan sheet, they must be identified with an arrow, indicating both direction and distance to the surface water. f. Methods to be used for final stabilization of all exposed soil areas. 4. The Permittee(s) must amend the SWPPP as necessary to include additional requirements, such as additional or modified BMPs, designed to correct problems identified or address situations whenever: a.There is a change in design, construction, operation, maintenance, weather or scasonal conditions that has a significant effect on the discharge of pollutants to surface waters or underground waters; b. Inspections or investigations by site operators, local, state or federal officials indicate the SWPPP is not effective in eliminating or significantly minimizing the discharge of pollutants to surface waters or underground waters or that the discharges are causing water quality standard exceedances; or c. The SWPPP is not achieving the general objectives of controlling pollutants in storm water discharges associated with construction activity, or the SN1'PPP is not consistent with the terms and conditions of this permit. d. At any time after permit coverage is effective, the MPGA mai determine that the project's storm water discharges may cause, have reasonable potential to cause, or contribute to non -attainment of any applicable water quality standard, or that the SWPPP does not incorporate the requirements in Part 111.A.7 related to an approved Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) implementation plan that contains construction storm water related requirements. if MPCA makes such determination(s) or an_v of the determinations in Parts III.A.4.a.-4.c., MPCA will notify the Permittees in writing. In response, the Permittees must develop a supplemental BMP action plan or appropriate SWPPP amendments describing SWPPP modifications to address the identified concerns and submit information requested by MPCA, which may include wq-strm2-51 Page 9 of 26 Permit No: MN R10000I an individual permit application. If MPCA's written notification requires a response, failure to respond within the specified timeframe constitutes a permit violation. The SWPPP must factor in any findings of and include any storm water mitigation measures required as the result of any environmental, archeological or other required local, state or federal review conducted for the project. For the purposes of this permit provision, mitigation measures mean avoiding, minimizing, rectifying (e.g., repairing, rehabilitating, restoring), reducing, eliminating or compensating for impacts related to: (1) storm water discharges associated with the project's construction activity; and (2) erosion prevention, sediment control and the permanent storm water management system for the project. 6. The SWPPP must provide additional measures as necessary to assure compliance with surface and ground water standards in Minn. R. chapters 7050 and 7060 in karst areas and to ensure protection of drinking water supply management areas (see Minn. R. 4725.4450). 7. If runoff from the site discharges to an impaired water which has an approved TMDL implementation plan containing requirements for construction storm water discharges, the Permittee must include the following in the SWPPP: a. identify the receiving water and the areas of the site discharging to it; and b. BMPs that are appropriate for the site and sufficient to comply with all applicable requirements of the TMDL implementation plan. B. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS Where ten (10) or more acres of disturbed soil drain to a common location, a temporary (or permanent) sediment basin must be provided prior to the runoff leaving the construction site or entering surface waters. The Permittee is encouraged, but not required, to install temporary sediment basins where appropriate in areas with steep slopes or highly erodible soils even if less than ten (10) acres drains to one area. The basins must be designed and constructed according to the following requirements: 1. The basins must provide storage below the outlet pipe for a calculated volume of runoff from a 2 year, 24 hour storm from each acre drained to the basin, except that in no case shall the basin provide less than 1800 cubic feet of storage below the outlet pipe from each acre drained to the basin. 2. Where no such calculation has been performed, a temporary (or permanent) sediment basin providing 3,600 cubic feet of storage below the outlet pipe per acre drained to the basin, shall be provided where attainable until final stabilization of the site. Temporary basin outlets must be designed to prevent short-circuiting and the discharge of floating debris. The basin must be designed with the ability to allow complete basin drawdown (e.g., perforated riser pipe wrapped with filter fabric and covered with crushed gravel, pumps or other means, see Part IV.D.) for maintenance activities, and provide a stabilized emergency overflow to prevent failure of pond integrity. Energy dissipation must be provided for the basin outlet (see Part IV.13.4). wq-stnn2-5 I Page 10 of 26 Permit No: NIN R 100001 4, The temporary (or permanent) basins must be constructed and made operational concurrent with the start of soil disturbance that is upgradient of the area and contributes runoff to the pond. Where the temporary sediment basin is not attainable due to site limitations, equivalent sediment controls such as smaller sediment basins, and/or sediment traps, silt fences, vegetative buffer strips, or any appropriate combination of measures are required for all down slope boundaries of the construction area and for those side slope boundaries deemed appropriate as dictated by individual site conditions. In determining whether installing a sediment basin is attainable, the Permittee must consider public safety and may consider factors such as site soils, slope, and available area on site. This determination must be documented in the SWPPP. C. PERMANENT STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM All storm water must be discharged in a manner that does not cause nuisance conditions, erosion in receiving channels or on downslope properties, or inundation in wetlands causing a significant adverse impact to the wetlands. Where a project's ultimate development replaces vegetation and/or other pervious surfaces with one or more acres of cumulative impervious surface, a water quality volume of '/2 inch of runoff from the new impervious surfaces created by the project must be treated by one of the methods outlined in Part III.C.1 through Part III.C.5 prior to the runoff leaving the constriction site or entering surface waters (excluding drainage systems that convey storm water to a constructed permanent storm water management_ facility designed to treat the water quality volume from the project). For those areas of a project where there is no feasible way to meet the treatment requirement for the water quality volume, other treatment such as grassed swales, smaller ponds or grit chambers is required prior to discharge to surface waters. A cumulative maximum of (3) three acres or 1% of project size whichever is larger can be treated in this manner. Where the proximity to bedrock precludes the installation of any of the permanent storm water management practices outlined in Part III.C., other treatment, such as grassed swales, smaller ponds, or grit chambers, is required prior to discharge to surface waters. For work on road projects where the lack of right of way precludes the installation of any of the permanent storm water management practices outlined in Part II1.C., other treatment such as grassed swales, smaller ponds, or grit chambers, is required prior to discharge to surface waters. 1. Wet Sedimentation Basin a. The basin must have a permanent volume of 1800 cubic feet of storage below the outlet pipe for each acre that drains to the basin. The basin's permanent volume must reach a minimum depth of at least 3 feet and must have no depth greater than 10 feet. The basin must be configured such that scour or resuspension of solids is minimized. b. The basin's water quality volume is calculated as '/2 inch of runoff from the new impervious surfaces created by the project. c. Basin outlets shall be designed such that the water quality volume is discharged at no more than 5.66 cubic feet per second (cfs) per acre of surface area of the pond. wq-strm2-51 Page 11 of 26 Permit No: IVIN R 100001 d. Basin outlets must be designed to prevent short-circuiting and the discharge of floating debris. Basin outlets must have energy dissipation. e. The basin must provide a stabilized emergency overflow to accommodate storm events in excess of the basin's hydraulic design. f. Adequate maintenance access must be provided (typically 8 ft. wide) for future maintenance of the basin. 2. Infiltration/Filtration Infiltration/Filtration options include but are not limited to: infiltration basins, infiltration trenches, rainwater gardens, sand filters, organic filters, bioretention areas, enhanced swales, dry storage ponds with underdrain discharge, off-line retention areas and natural depressions. Infiltration must be used only as appropriate to the site and land uses. Settleable solids, floating materials, oils and grease should be removed from the runoff to the maximum extent practicable before runoff enters the infiltration/filtration system. Filtration systems must have a reasonable chance of achieving approximately 80% removal of total suspended solids. The Permittee(s) must evaluate the impact of constructing an infiltration practice on existing hydrologic features (e.g., existing wetlands) and try to maintain pre-existing conditions (e.g., do not breach a perched water table which is supporting a wetland). For a discussion of ground water warnings, design measures, maintenance considerations or other retention, detention, and treatment devices, see the MPCA's Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas found on the MPCA's web -site. a. Infiltration systems should not be excavated to final grade until the contributing drainage area has been constructed and fully stabilized. b. During construction of an infiltration system, rigorous sediment and erosion controls (e.g., diversion berms) should be used to keep sediment and runoff completely away from the infiltration area. The area must be staked off and marked so that heavy construction equipment will not compact the soil in the proposed infiltration area. c. To prevent clogging of the infiltration or filtration system, a pretreatment device such as a vegetated filter strip, small sedimentation basin, or water quality inlet (e.g., grit chamber) must be used to settle particulates before the storm water discharges into the infiltration or filtration system. d. Infiltration or filtration systems shall be sufficient to infiltrate or filter a water quality volume of '/2 inch of runoff from the new impervious surfaces created by the project. e. The water quality volume shall discharge through the soil or filter media in 48 hours or less. Additional flows that cannot be infiltrated or filtered in 48 hours should be routed to bypass the system through a stabilized discharge point. A way to visually verify that the system is operating as designed must be provided. f. Appropriate on-site testing shall be conducted to ensure a minimum of 3 feet of separation from the seasonally saturated soils (or from bedrock) and the bottom of the proposed infiltration system. Calculations and computer model results that demonstrate the design adequacy of the infiltration system must be included as part of the SWPPP. Wq-strrn2-5 I Page 12 of 26 Permit No: 1MN R100001 g. Adequate maintenance access must be provided (typically 8 .Ft. ,vide) along with a maintenance plan identifying whom will be performing fixture maintenance of the infiltration or filtration system. h. Use of designed infiltration systems from industrial areas with exposed significant materials or from vehicle fueling and maintenance areas is prohibited. 3. Regional Ponds Regional ponds can be used provided that they are constructed ponds, not a natural wetland or waterbody, (wetlands used as regional ponds must be mitigated for, see Appendix A) and designed in accordance with this permit's design requirements (see Part III.C. l) for all water from impervious surfaces that reach the pond. Permittees shall not construct regional ponds in wetlands, regardless of their condition, quality or designation by local plans, unless the mitigative sequence in Appendix A. D.2 of this permit has been completed. There must be no significant degradation of the waterways between the project and the regional pond. The owner must obtain written authorization from the applicable local governmental unit (LGU) or private entity that owns and maintains the regional pond. The LGU's or private entity's written authorization must identify that the regional pond will discharge the water quality volume ('/2 inch of runoff from the impervious watershed area) at no more than 5.66 cfs per acre of surface area of the pond. The owner must include the LGU's or private entity's written authorization in the SWPPP. The LGU's or private entity's written authorization must be obtained before the owner finalizes the SWPPP and before any application for this permit is made to the MPGA. 4. Combination of Practices A combination of practices, including those required by a LGU, which meet the requirements of Part III.C.1, 2 and 3 respectively, (i.e., wet sedimentation basins, infiltration/filtration, and regional ponds) may be used such that the water quality volume of '/2 inch of runoff from the new impervious surfaces created by the project is accounted for in the owner's permanent storm water management system (e.g., '/4 inch infiltrated and '/4 inch treated through a wet sedimentation basin). If any combination of these practices is used, the SWPPP must contain documentation (e.g., LGU or private entity's authorization, infiltration computer model results or calculations, etc.) identifying the volume that each practice addresses. 5. Alternative Method Where an alternative, innovative treatment system is proposed and demonstrated by calculation, design or other independent methods to achieve approximately 80% removal of total suspended solids on an annual average basis, the Commissioner will approve the method if the process outlined in Part II.B.3.c. is completed, and the following information is submitted: a. All calculations, drainage areas, plans, and specifications for the proposed alternative method and a graphic representation of the area to be served by the method. These items must be included in the SWPPP and submitted to the MPCA at least 90 days prior to the proposed starting date of the construction activity. b. A 2 year monitoring plan to sample runoff from the proposed method. The plan must include a discussion of the methods used to collect samples, location where samples will be taken (upstream and downstream of the proposed method), frequency of samples (minimum of six wq-smn2-51 Page 13 of 26 Pcrmit No: MN R 10000 1 runoff events sampled), identify lab used to analyze the samples and quality assurance and quality control methods to be used. The plan must include a schedule for submitting the monitoring data annually. c. A mitigation plan that addresses how the water quality volume will be treated in the event that the monitoring data shows the proposed alternative treatment method does not function as designed. d. The alternative method must achieve approximately 80% removal of total suspended solids on an average annual basis for the conditions expected at the site. The design must also consider public safety, health and water quality concerns. Proprietary information on effectiveness will not be considered for alternative treatment method review and approval. No construction activity on the project is covered under this permit until the applicant receives an alternative treatment approval letter from the MPCA as described in Part 11.13.3.c. D. RECORD RETENTION The SWPPP,all changes to it, and inspections and maintenance records must be kept at the site during construction by the Permittee who has operational control of that portion of the site. The SWPPP can be kept in either the field office or in an on site vehicle. All owner(s) must keep the SWPPP, along with the following additional records, on file for three years after submittal of the NOT as outlined in Part 11.C. This does not include any records after submittal of the NOT. 1. Any other permits required for the project; 2. Records of all inspection and maintenance conducted during construction (see Part W.E. Inspections and Maintenance); 3. All permanent operation and maintenance agreements that have been implemented, including all right of way, contracts, covenants and other binding requirements regarding perpetual maintenance; and 4. All required calculations for design of the temporary and permanent storm water management systems. PART IV. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REQUIREMENTS A. STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN The Permittee(s) must implement the SWPPP and the requirements of this part. The Best Management Practices (BMPs) identified in the SWPPP and in this permit must be installed in all appropriate and functional manner. B. EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES 1. The Permittee(s) must plan for and implement appropriate construction phasing, vegetative buffer strips, horizontal slope grading, and other construction practices that minimize erosion, so wq-su m2-51 Page 14 of 26 Permit No: MN 8100001 that the inspection and maintenance requirements of Part W.E. are complied with. The location of areas not to be disturbed must be delineated (e.g. with flags, stakes, signs, silt fence etc.) on the development site before work begins. 2. All exposed soil areas with a continuous positive slope within 200 lineal feet of a surface water, must have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover for the exposed soil areas year round, according to the following table of slopes and time frames: Type of Slope Time (Maximum time an area can remain open when the area Steeper than 3:1 7 days is not actively being worked.) 10:1 to 3:1 14 days Flatter than 10:1 21 days These areas include constructed storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system, such as a curb and gutter system, storm sewer inlet, temporary or permanent drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. Temporary stockpiles without significant silt, clay or organic components (e.g., clean aggregate stockpiles, demolition concrete stockpiles, sand stockpiles) are exempt from this requirement but must comply with Part IV.C.S. 3. The normal wetted perimeter of any temporary or permanent drainage ditch that drains water from a construction site, or diverts water around a site, must be stabilized within 200 lineal feet from the property edge, or from the point of discharge to any surface water. Stabilization must be completed within 24 hours of connecting to a surface water. 4. Pipe outlets must be provided with temporary or permanent energy dissipation within 24 hours of connection to a surface water. C. SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES 1. Sediment control practices must minimize sediment from entering surface waters, including curb and gutter systems and storm sewer inlets. a. Temporary or permanent drainage ditches and sediment basins that are designed as part of a treatment system (e.g., ditches with rock check dams) require sediment control practices only as appropriate for site conditions. b. If the down gradient treatment system is overloaded, additional upgradient sediment control practices must be installed to eliminate the overloading, and the SWPPP must be amended to identify these additional practices as required in Part III.A.4, a. through c. c. In order to maintain sheet flow and minimize rills and/or gullies, there shall be no unbroken slope length of greater than 75 feet for slopes with a grade of 3:1 or steeper. 2. Sediment control practices must be established on all down gradient perimeters before any upgradient land disturbing activities begin. These practices shall remain in place until final stabilization has been established in accordance with Part W.G. wq-strrn2-51 Page 15 of 26 Permit No: MN R 100001 3. The timing of the installation of sediment control practices may be adjusted to accommodate short-term activities such as clearing or grubbing, or passage of vehicles. Any short -terms activity must be completed as quickly as possible and the sediment control practices must be installed immediately after the activity is completed. However, sediment control practices must be installed before the next precipitation event even if the activity is not complete. 4. All storm drain inlets must be protected by appropriate BMPs during construction until all sources with potential for discharging to the inlet have been stabilized. 5. Temporary soil stockpiles must have silt fence or other effective sediment controls, and cannot be placed in surface waters, including storm water conveyances such as curb and gutter systems, or conduits and ditches. 6. Vehicle tracking of sediment from the construction site must be minimized by BMPs such as stone pads, concrete or steel wash racks, or equivalent systems. Street sweeping must be used if such BMPs are not adequate to prevent sediment from being tracked onto the street (see Part IV.E.4.d.). The Permittee must install temporary sedimentation basins as required in Part III.B. of this permit. D. DEWATERING AND BASIN DRAINING Dewatering or basin draining (e.g., pumped discharges, trench/ditch cuts for drainage) related to the construction activity that may have turbid or sediment laden discharge water must be discharged to a temporary or permanent sedimentation basin on the project site whenever possible. If the water cannot be discharged to a sedimentation basin prior to entering the surface water, it must be treated with the appropriate BMPs, such that the discharge does not adversely affect the receiving water or downstream landowners. The Permittee(s) must ensure that discharge points are adequately protected from erosion and scour. The discharge must be dispersed over natural rock riprap, sand bags, plastic sheeting or other accepted energy dissipation measures. Adequate sedimentation control measures are required for discharge water that contains suspended solids. 2. All water from dewatering or basin draining activities must be discharged in a manner that does not cause nuisance conditions, erosion in receiving channels or on downslope properties, or inundation in wetlands causing significant adverse impact to the wetland. E. INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE 1. The Permittee(s) (either the owner or operator, whoever is identified in the SWPPP) must routinely inspect the construction site once every seven (7) days during active construction and within 24 hours after a rainfall event greater than 0.5 inches in 24 hours. 2. All inspections and maintenance conducted during construction must be recorded in writing and these records must be retained with the SWPPP in accordance with Part III.D. Records of each inspection and maintenance activity shall include: a. Date and time of inspections; wq-strm2-5 I Page 16 of 26 Permit No: MN R 100001 b. Name of person(s) conducting inspections; c. Findings of inspections, including recommendations for corrective actions; d. Corrective actions taken (including dates, times, and party completing maintenance activities); c. Date and amount of all rainfall events greater than 1/2 inch (0.5 inches) in 24 hours; and f. Documentation of changes made to the SWPPP as required in Part III.A.4. 3. Where parts of the construction site have undergone final stabilization, but work remains on other parts of the site, inspections of the stabilized areas may be reduced to once per month. Where work has been suspended due to frozen ground conditions, the required inspections and maintenance must take place as soon as runoff occurs at the site or prior to resuming constriction, whichever comes first. 4. All erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs must be inspected to ensure integrity and effectiveness. All nonfunctional BMPs must be repaired, replaced, or supplemented with functional BMPs. The Permittee(s) must investigate and comply with the following inspection and maintenance requirements: a. All silt fences must be repaired, replaced, or supplemented when they become nonfimctional or the sediment reaches 1/3 of the height of the fence. These repairs must be made within 14 hours of discovery, or as soon as field conditions allow access. b. Temporary and permanent sedimentation basins must be drained and the sediment removed when the depth of sediment collected in the basin reaches 1/2 the storage volume. Drainage and removal must be completed within 72 hours of discovery, or as soon as field conditions allow access (see Part IV.D.). c. Surface waters, including drainage ditches and conveyance systems, must be inspected for evidence of sediment being deposited by erosion. The Permittee(s) must remove all deltas and sediment deposited in surface waters, including drainage ways, catch basins, and other drainage systems, and restabilize the areas where sediment removal results in exposed soil. The removal and stabilization must take place within seven (7) days of discovery unless precluded by legal, regulatory, or physical access constraints. The Permittee shall use all reasonable efforts to obtain access. If precluded, removal and stabilization must take place within seven (7) calendar days of obtaining access. The Permittee is responsible for contacting all local, regional, state and federal authorities and receiving any applicable permits, prior to conducting any work. d. Construction site vehicle exit locations must be inspected for evidence of off-site sediment tracking onto paved surfaces. Tracked sediment must be removed from all off-site paved surfaces, within 24 hours of discovery, or if applicable, within a shorter time to comply with Part IV.C.6. e. The Permittee(s) are responsible for the operation and maintenance of temporary and permanent water quality management BMPs, as well as all erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs, for the duration of the construction work at the site. 'I'he Wq-snm2-5 1 Page 17 of 26 Permit No: MN R100001 Permittee(s) are responsible until another Permittee has assumed control according to Part II.B.5 over all areas of the site that have not been finally stabilized or the site has undergone final stabilization, and a NOT has been submitted to the MPCA. f. If sediment escapes the construction site, off-site accumulations of sediment must be removed in a manner and at a frequency sufficient to minimize off-site impacts (e.g., fiigitive sediment in streets could be washed into storm sewers by the next rain and/or pose a safety hazard to users of public streets). 5. All infiltration areas must be inspected to ensure that no sediment from ongoing construction activities is reaching the infiltration area and these areas are protected from compaction due to construction equipment driving across the infiltration area. F. POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT MEASURES The Permittee(s) shall implement the following pollution prevention management measures on the site: 1. Solid Waste: Collected sediment, asphalt and concrete millings, floating debris, paper, plastic, fabric, construction and demolition debris and other wastes must be disposed of properly and must comply with MPCA disposal requirements. 2. Hazardous Materials: Oil, gasoline, paint and any hazardous substances must be properly stored, including secondary containment, to prevent spills, leaks or other discharge. Restricted access.to storage areas must be provided to prevent vandalism. Storage and disposal of hazardous waste must be in compliance with MPCA regulations. 3. External washing of trucks and other construction vehicles must be limited to a defined area of the site. Runoff must be contained and waste properly disposed of. No engine degreasing is allowed on site. G. FINAL STABILIZATION The Permittee(s) must ensure final stabilization of the site. The Permittee(s) must submit a NOT within 30 days after final stabilization is complete, or another owner/operator (Permittee) has assumed control according to Part II.B.5 over all areas of the site that have not undergone final stabilization. Final stabilization can be achieved in one of the following ways: 1. All soil disturbing activities at the site have been completed and all soils must be stabilized by a uniform perennial vegetative cover with a density of 70 percent over the entire pervious surface area, or other equivalent means necessary to prevent soil failure under erosive conditions and; a. All drainage ditches, constructed to drain water from the site after construction is complete, must be stabilized to preclude erosion; b. All temporary synthetic, and structural erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs (such as silt fence) must be removed as part of the site final stabilization; and c. The Permittee(s) must clean out all sediment from conveyances and from temporary sedimentation basins that are to be used as permanent water quality management basins. wq-strm2-5 I Page 18 of 26 Permit No: NIN 8100001 Sediment must be stabilized to prevent it from being washed back into the basin, conveyances or drainageways discharging off-site or to surface waters. The cleanout of permanent basins must be sufficient to return the basin to design capacity. 2. For residential construction only, final stabilization has been achieved when temporary erosion protection and down gradient perimeter control for individual lots has been completed and the residence has been transferred to the homeowner. Additionally, the Permittee must distribute the MPCA "homeowner factsheet" to the homeowner to inform the homeowner of the need for, and benefits of, final stabilization. PART V. GENERAL PROVISIONS A. APPLICABILITY CRITERIA If the Commissioner determines that storm water discharges associated with a construction activity are contributing to a violation of a water quality standard or would be more appropriately regulated by an individual permit, the Commissioner may require the owner to be covered by an individual storm water discharge permit. The Commissioner may require the owner to develop and implement specific BMPs and monitor the discharge from the site. If applicable, upon issuance of an individual permit, this general permit would no longer apply. 2. If the terms and conditions of this general permit cannot be met, an owner may request an individual permit, in accordance with Minn. R. 7001. B. RESPONSE The SWPPP, including all certificates, reports, records, or other information required by this permit, must be made available to federal, state, and local officials within 72 hours upon request for the duration of the permit and for three years following the NOT. This does not include any records after submittal of the NOT. C. PROHIBITIONS This permit prohibits discharges of any material other than storm water, and discharges from dewatering or basin draining activities in accordance with Part IV.D.I and 2. For example, prohibited discharges include but are not limited to vehicle and equipment washing, maintenance spills, wash water, and discharges of oil and other hazardous substances. D. TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP OR CONTROL This permit may not be assigned or transferred by the permit holder except when transfer occurs in accordance with the applicable requirements of Part 11.B.5. E. CIVIL AND CRIMINAL LIABILITY Nothing in this permit must be construed to relieve the Permittee(s) from civil or criminal penalties for noncompliance with the terms and conditions provided herein. Nothing in this permit must be construed to preclude the initiation of any legal action or relieve the Permittee(s) from any responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties to which the Permittee(s) is or may be subject to under Section 311 of the Act and Minn. Stat. chs. 115 and 116, as amended. The Permittee(s) are not liable wq-strm2-51 Page 19 of 26 Permit No: MN R100001 for permit requirements for activities occurring on those portions of a site where another parry has submitted a subdivision short form registration as described in Part II. B.5 or a NOT has been issued by the MPCA except for responsibilities listed under Part III.C.5 if applicable. F. SEVERABILITY The provisions of this permit are severable. If any provision of this permit, or the application of any provision of this permit to any circumstances, is held invalid, the application of such provision to other circumstances, and the remainder of this permit must not be affected thereby. G. NPDES/SDS RULE STANDARD CONDITIONS The Permittee(s) must comply with the provisions of Minn. R. 7001.0150, subp. 3 and 7001.1090, subp. 1.A,B,C,H,I. This permit does not require the submittal of a data monitoring report, except where monitoring is required in Part III.C.5. H. INSPECTION AND ENTRY The Permittee(s) must comply with the provisions of 40 CFR 122.41(i), Minn. Stat. Ch. 115.04 and Minn. Stat. Ch. 115B.17. The Permittee(s) shall al low representatives of the MPCA or any member, employee or agent thereof, when authorized by it, upon presentation of credentials, to enter upon any property, public or private, for the purpose of obtaining information or examination of records or conducting surveys or investigations. APPENDIX A A. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS All requirements in this Appendix are in addition to BMPs already specified in the permit. Where provisions of Appendix A conflict with requirements elsewhere in the permit, the provisions in Appendix A take precedence. All BMPs used to comply with this Appendix must be documented in the SWPPP for the project. If the terms and conditions of this Appendix cannot be met, an individual permit will be required in accordance with Minn. R. ch. 7001. B. REQUIREMENTS FOR DISCHARGES TO SPECIAL WATERS Additional BMPs together with enhanced runoff controls, are required for discharges to the following special waters (part B.1 through B.8 of Appendix A). The BMPs identified for each special water are required for those areas of the project draining to a discharge point on the project that is within 2000 feet of a special water and flows to that special water. 1. Wilderness areas: Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness; Voyageurs National Park; Kettle River from the site of the former dam at Sandstone to its confluence with the Saint Croix River; Rum River from Ogechie Lake spillway to the northernmost confluence with Lake Onamia. Discharges to these waters must incorporate the BMPs outlined in C.1, C.2, C.3 and CA of this appendix. 2. Mississippi River: Those portions from Lake Itasca to the southerly boundary of Morrison County that are included in the Mississippi Headwaters Board comprehensive plan dated wq-strm2-5 I Page 20 of 26 Permit No: NIN R 100001 February 12, 1981. Discharges to these waters must incorporate the BMPs outlined in C.1, C.2 and C.3 of this appendix. Scenic or recreational river segments: Saint Croix river, entire length; Cannon River from northern city limits of Faribault to its confluence with the Mississippi River; North Fork of the Crow River from Lake Koronis outlet to the Meeker -Wright county line; Kettle River from north Pine County line to the site of the former dam at Sandstone; Minnesota River from Lac qui Parle clam to Redwood County state aid highway 11; Mississippi River from county state aid highway 7 bridge in Saint Cloud to northwestern city limits of Anoka; and Rum River from state aid Highway 27 bridge in Onamia to Madison and Rice streets in Anoka. Discharges to these waters must incorporate the BMPs outlined in C.1, C.2 and C.3 of this appendix. 4. Lake Superior: (prohibited and restricted) Discharges to Lake Superior must incorporate the BMPs outlined in C.1, C.2 and C.3 of this appendix. 5. Lake Trout Lakes: Identified in Minn. R. 7050.0470, including those inside the boundaries of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness and Voyageurs National Park. Discharges to these waters must incorporate the BMPs outlined in C.1, C.2, C.3 and CA of this appendix. 6. Trout Lakes: identified in Minn. R. 6264.0050, subp. 2. Discharges to these waters must incorporate the BMPs outlined in C.1, C.2, C.3, and CA of this appendix. 7. Scientific and natural areas: Boot Lake, Anoka County; Kettle River in sections 15, 22, 23, T 41 N, R 20, Pine County; Pennington Bog, Beltrami County; Purvis Lake -Ober Foundation, Saint Louis County; Waters within the borders of Itasca Wilderness Sanctuary, Clearwater County; Iron Springs Bog, Clearwater County; Wolsfeld Woods, Hennepin County; Green Water Lake, Becker County; Blackdog Preserve, Dakota County; Prairie Bush Clover, Jackson County; Black Lake Bog, Pine County; Pembina Trail Preserve, Polk County; and Falls Creek, Washington County. Discharges to these waters must incorporate the BMPs outlined in C.1, C.2, C.3 and CA of this appendix. 8. Trout Streams: listed in Minn. R. 6264.0050, subp. 4. Discharges to these waters must incorporate the BMPs outlined in Appendix A C.1, C.2, C.3, and C.5 of this appendix. C. ADDITIONAL BMPS FOR SPECIAL WATERS For the BMPs described in C.2. CA and C.5 of this Annendix Where the proximity to bedrock precludes the installation of any of the permanent storm water management practices outlined in Appendix A, other treatment such as grassed swales, smaller ponds, or grit chambers is required prior to discharge to surface waters. For work on road projects where the lack of right of way precludes the installation of any of the permanent storm water management practices outlined in Appendix A, other treatment such as grassed swales, smaller ponds, or grit chambers is required prior to discharge to surface waters. 1. During construction. a. All exposed soil areas with a slope of 3:1 or steeper, that have a continuous positive slope to a special water must have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover within 3 days wq-strm2-51 Page 21 of 26 Permit No: MN R100001 after the area is no longer actively being worked. All other slopes that have a continuous positive slope to a special water must have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover within 7 days after the area is no longer actively being worked. b. Temporary sediment basin requirements described in Part Ill. B.1-5 must be used for common drainage locations that serve an area with five (5) or more acres disturbed at one time. 2. Post construction.' The water quality volume that must be treated by the project's permanent storm water management system described in Part III.C. shall be one (1) inch of runoff from the new impervious surfaces created by the project. Buffer zone. An undisturbed buffer zone of not less than 100 linear feet from the special water (not including tributaries) shall be maintained at all times. Exceptions from this requirement for areas, such as water crossings or limited water access, are allowed if the Permittee fully documents in the SWPPP the circumstances and reasons that the buffer encroachment is necessary. All potential water quality, scenic and other environmental impacts of these exceptions must be minimized and documented in the SWPPP for the project. 4. Enhanced runoff controls. The permanent storm water management system must be designed such that the pre and post project runoff rate and volume from the 1, and 2 -year 24-hour precipitation events remains the same. Temperature Controls. The permanent storm water management system must be designed such that the discharge from the project will minimize any increase in the temperature of trout stream receiving waters resulting from the 1, and 2 -year 24-hour precipitation events. This includes all tributaries of designated trout streams within the section that the trout stream is located. Projects that discharge to trout streams must minimize the impact using one or more of the following measures, in order of preference: a. Minimize new impervious surfaces. b. Minimize the discharge from connected impervious surfaces by discharging to vegetated areas, or grass swales, and through the use of other non-structural controls. c. Infiltration or evapotranspiration of runoff in excess of pre -project conditions (up to the 2 - year 24-hour precipitation event). d. If ponding is used, the design must include an appropriate combination of measures such as shading, filtered bottom withdrawal, vegetated swale discharges or constructed wetland treatment cells that will limit temperature increases. The pond should be designed to draw down in 24 hours or less. e. Other methods that will minimize any increase in the temperature of the trout stream. D. REQUIREMENTS FOR DISCHARGING TO WETLANDS If the project has any storm water discharges with the potential for significant adverse impacts to a wetland (e.g., conversion of a natural wetland to a storm water pond) , the Permittee(s) must demonstrate that the wetland mitigative sequence has been followed in accordance with D.1 or D.2 of this appendix. 1. If the potential adverse impacts to a wetland on a specific project site have been addressed by permits or other approvals from an official statewide program (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 404 program, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, or the State of Minnesota Wetland wq-strm2-51 Page 22 of 26 Permit No: MN .8100001 Conservation Act) that are issued specifically for the project and project site, the Permittee may use the permit or other determination issued by these agencies to show that the potential adverse impacts have been addressed. For the purposes of this permit, demimmus actions are determinations by the permitting agency that address the project impacts, whereas a non - jurisdictional determination does not address project impacts. If there are impacts from the project that are not addressed in one of the permits or other determinations discussed in Appendix A, Part D. I (e.g., permanent inundation or flooding of the wetland, significant degradation of water quality, excavation, filling, draining), the Permittee must minimize all adverse impacts to wetlands by utilizing appropriate measures. Measures used must be based on the nature of the wetland, its vegetative community types and the established hydrology. These measures include in order of preference: a. Avoid all significant adverse impacts to wetlands from the project and post project discharge. b. Minimize any unavoidable impacts from the project and post project discharge. c. Provide compensatory mitigation when the Permittee determines that there is no reasonable and practicable alternative to having a significant adverse impact on a wetland. For compensatory mitigation, wetland restoration or creation shall be of the same type, size and whenever reasonable and practicable in the same watershed as the impacted wetland. E. DISCHARGES REQUIRING ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW This permit does not replace or satisfy any environmental review requirements, including those under the Minnesota Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) or the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The owner must complete any environmental review required by law, including any required Environmental Assessment Work Sheets or Environmental Impact Statements, Federal environmental review, or other required review. F. DISCHARGES AFFECTING ENDANGERED OR THREATENED SPECIES This permit does not replace or satisfy any review requirements for Endangered or Threatened species, from new or expanded discharges that adversely impact or contribute to adverse impacts on a listed endangered or threatened species or adversely modify a designated critical habitat. The owner must conduct any required review and coordinate with appropriate agencies for any project with the potential of affecting threatened or endangered species, or their critical habitat. G. DISCHARGES AFFECTING HISTORIC PLACES OR ARCHEOLOGICAL SITES This permit does not replace or satisfy any review requirements for Historic Places or Archeological Sites, from new or expanded discharges which adversely affect properties listed or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places or affecting known or discovered Archeological Sites. The owner must be in compliance with National Historic Preservation Act and conduct all required review and coordination related to historic preservation, including significant anthropological sites and any burial sites, with the Minnesota Historic Preservation Officer. wq-strm2-5 I Page 23 of 26 Permit No: MN R 100001 APPENDIX B. DEFINITIONS 1. "Best Management Practices (BMPs)" means erosion and sediment control and water quality management practices that are the most effective and practicable means of controlling, preventing, and minimizing degradation of surface water, including avoidance of impacts, construction -phasing, minimizing the length of time soil areas are exposed, prohibitions, and other managernent practices published by state or designated area -wide planning agencies. Individual BMPs found in this permit are described in the current version of Protecting Water Ouality in Urban Areas, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 2000. BMPs must be adapted to the site and can be adopted from other sources. However, they must be similar in purpose and at least as effective and stringent as MPCA's BMPs. (Other sources include manufacturers specifications, Storm Water Management for Construction Activities: Developing Pollution Prevention Plans and Best Management Practices, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1992, and Erosion Control Design Manual, Minnesota Department of Transportation, et al, 1993). 2. "Commissioner" means the Commissioner of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency or the Commissioner's designee. 3. "Common Plan of Development or Sale" means a contiguous area where multiple separate and distinct land disturbing activities may be taking place at different times, on different schedules, but under one proposed plan. One plan is broadly defined to include design, permit application, advertisement or physical demarcation indicating that land -disturbing activities may occur. 4. "Construction Activity" For this permit, construction activity includes construction activity as defined in 40 C.F.R. part 122.26(b)(14)(x) and small construction activity as defined in 40 C.F.R. part 122.26(b)(15). This includes a disturbance to the land that results in a change in the topography, existing soil cover (both vegetative and non -vegetative), or the existing soil topography that may result in accelerated storm water runoff, leading to soil erosion and movement of sediment into surface waters or drainage systems. Examples of construction activity may include clearing. grading, filling and excavating. Construction activity includes the disturbance of less than one acre of total land area that is a part of a larger common plan of development or sale if the larger common plan will ultimately disturb one (1) acre or more. 5. "Dewatering" means the removal of water for construction activity. It can be a discharge of' appropriated surface or groundwater to dry and/or solidify a constriction site. It may require Minnesota Department of Natural Resources permits to be appropriated and if contaminated may require other MPCA permits to be discharged. 6. "Energy Dissipation" means methods employed at pipe outlets to prevent cr,sion. Examples include, but are not limited to: concrete aprons, riprap, splash pads, and gabions that are designed to prevent erosion. 7. "Erosion Prevention" means measures employed to prevent erosion including but not limited to: soil stabilization practices, limited grading, mulch, temporary or permanent cover, and construction phasing. 8. "Final Stabilization" means that either: a. All soil disturbing activities at the site have been completed and a uniform (e.g., evenly distributed, without large bare areas) perennial vegetative cover with a density of 7W°'o of the wq-strm2-51 Page 24 of 26 Permit Flo: MN R100001 native background vegetative cover for the area has been established on all unpaved areas and areas not covered by permanent structures, or equivalent permanent stabilization measures (such as the use of riprap, gabions, or geotextiles) have been employed; b. For individual lots in residential constriction by either: (a) The homebuilder completing final stabilization as specified above, or (b) the homebuilder establishing temporary stabilization including perimeter controls for an individual lot prior to occupation of the home by the homeowner and informing the homeowner of the need for, and benefits of, final stabilization. (Homeowners typically have an incentive to put in the landscaping functionally equivalent to final stabilization as quick as possible to keep mud out of their homes and off sidewalks and driveways.); or c. For construction projects on land used for agricultural purposes (e.g., pipelines across crop or range land) final stabilization may be accomplished by returning the disturbed land to its preconstruction agricultural use. Areas disturbed that were not previously used for agricultural activities, such as buffer strips immediately adjacent to surface waters and drainage systems, and areas which are not being returned to their preconstruction agricultural use must meet the final stabilization criteria in (a) or (b) above. "General Contractor" means the party who signs the construction contract with the owner to construct the project described in the final plans and specifications. Where the construction project involves more than one contractor, the general contractor will be the party responsible for managing the project on behalf of the owner. In some cases, the owner may be the general contractor. In these cases, the owner may contract an individual as the operator who would become the Co- o_ Permittee. 10. "Homeowner Factsheet" means a fact sheet developed by the MPCA to be given to homeowners at the time of sale by a builder to inform the homeowner of the need for, and benefits of, final stabilization. 11. "Impervious Surface" means a constructed hard surface that either prevents or retards the entry of water into the soil and causes water to run off the surface in greater quantities and at an increased rate of flow than prior to development. Examples include rooftops, sidewalks, patios, driveways, parking lots, storage areas, and concrete, asphalt, or gravel roads. 12. "National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)" means the program for issuing, modifying, revoking, reissuing, terminating, monitoring, and enforcing permits under the Clean Water Act (Sections 301, 318, 402, and 405) and United States Code of Federal Regulations Title 33, Sections 1317, 1328, 1342, and 1345.. 13. "Normal Wetted Perimeter" means the area of a conveyance, such as a ditch, channel, or pipe that is in contact with water during flow events that are expected to occur once every year. 14. "Notice of Termination" means notice to terminate coverage under this permit after construction is complete, the site has undergone final stabilization, and maintenance agreements for all permanent facilities have been established, in accordance with all applicable conditions of this permit. Notice of Termination forms are available from the MPCA. 15. "Operator" means the person (usually the general contractor), designated by the owner, who has day to day operational control and/or the ability to modify project plans and specifications related to wq-strm2-5 I Page 25 of 26 Permit No: MN R 10000 1 the SWPPP. The person must be knowledgeable in those areas of the permit for which the operator is responsible, (Part II.B. and Part IV.) and must perform those responsibilities in a workmanlike manner. 16. "Owner" means the person or party possessing the title of the land on which the constriction activities will occur; or if the construction activity is for a lease holder, the party or individual identified as the lease holder; or the contracting government agency responsible for the construction activity. 17. "Permanent Cover" means final stabilization. Examples include grass, gravel, asphalt, and concrete. 18. "Permittee" means a person or persons, firm, or governmental agency or other institution that signs the application submitted to the MPCA and is responsible for compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit. 19. "Saturated Soil' means the highest seasonal elevation in the soil that is in a reduced chemical state because of soil voids being filled with water. Saturated soil is evidenced by the presence of redoximorphic features or other information. 20. "Sediment Control" means methods employed to prevent sediment from leaving the site. Sediment control practices include silt fences, sediment traps, earth dikes, drainage swales, check dams, subsurface drains, pipe slope drains, storm drain inlet protection, and temporary or permanent sedimentation basins. 21. "Small Construction Activity" means small construction activity as defined in 40 C.F.R. part 122.26(b)(15) . Small construction activities include clearing, grading and excavating that result in land disturbance of equal to or greater than one acre and less than five acres. Small construction activity includes the disturbance of less than one (1) acre of total land area that is part of a larger common plan of development or sale if the larger common plan will ultimately disturb equal to or greater than one and less than five (5) acres. 22. "Stabilized" means the exposed ground surface has been covered by appropriate materials such as mulch, staked sod, riprap, wood fiber blanket, or other material that prevents erosion from occurring. Grass seeding is not stabilization. 23. "Standard Plates" means general drawings having or showing similar characteristics or qualities that are representative of a construction practice or activity. 24. "Storm water" is defined under Minn. R. 7077.0105, subp. 41(b), and includes precipitation runoff, storm water runoff, snow melt nmoff, and any other surface runoff and drainage. 25. "Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan" means a plan for storm water discharge that includes erosion prevention measures and sediment controls that, when implemented, will decrease soil erosion on a parcel of land and decrease off-site nonpoint pollution. 26. "Surface Water or Waters" means all streams, lakes, ponds, marshes, wetlands, reservoirs, springs, rivers, drainage systems, waterways, watercourses, and irrigation systems whether natural or artificial, public or private. wq-strm2-51 Page 26 of 26 Permit No: IVIN R 10000 1 27. "Temporary Erosion Protection" means methods employed to prevent erosion. Examples of temporary cover include; straw, wood fiber blanket, wood chips, and erosion netting. 28. "Underground Waters" means water contained below the surface of the earth in the saturated zone including, without limitation, all waters whether under confined, unconfined, or perched conditions, in near surface unconsolidated sediment or regolith, or in rock formations deeper underground. The term ground water shall be synonymous with underground water. 29. "Waters of the State" (as defined in Minn. Stat. § 1] 5.01, subd. 22) means all streams, lakes, ponds, marshes, watercourses, waterways, wells, springs, reservoirs, aquifers, irrigation systems, drainage systems and all other bodies or accumulations of water, surface or underground, natural or artificial, public or private, which are contained within, flow through, or border upon the state or any portion thereof. 30. "Water Quality Volume" means '/z inch of runoff from the new impervious surfaces created by this project and is the volume of water to be treated in the permanent storm water management system, as required by this permit except as provided in Appendix A.C.2. 31. "Wetland" or "Wetlands" is defined in Minn. R. 7050.0130, subp. F and includes those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface water or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas. Constructed wetlands designed for wastewater treatment are not waters of the state. Wetlands must have the following attributes: a. A predominance of hydric soils; b. Inundated or saturated by surface water or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support a prevalence of hydrophytic vegetation typically adapted for life in a saturated soil condition; and c. Under normal circumstances support a prevalence of such vegetation. wq-strm2-51 i - i elr�ar� FILTRATION DEVICES Proprietary systems used as an example only - NOT an endorsement Design Criteria: ► Pollutants of interest for reduction ► Desired removal efficiency ► Design flow or volume, site constraints on size, desired location of treatment unit ► Pre-treatment requirements ► Installation and maintenance costs, life of unit Benefits: ► Units are typically underground or within existing structures and do riot consume much site space ► Filtration devices can be customized to reduce a specific pollutant of concern ► Can often be easily incorporated into fully developed sites ► Can be used for pre-treatment prior to infiltration practices ► Relevant for use on industrial sites because filters can remove pollutants such as metals and oils Limitations: ► Efficiency has not been widely tested ► Each type of unit has specific design constraints and limitations for use ► Can be more costly that other treatment methods Treatment may be greatly reduced if frequent maintenance is not condl_icteca ► Subject to freezing in cold climates Definition: Filtration devices (inserts_) allow stormwater to pass through filter media which are designed to reduce specific stormwater Pollutants, but primarily solids and oils. Pollutants are captured physically or through sorption onto the filter media. Filters may either be inserts that are retrofitted into existing catch basins or manholes, or stand alone units supplied by a manufacturer. Water Quality (Valla) NA Channel Protection (V CP) NA Overbank Flood Protection (V Plo) NA Extreme Flood Protection (V P,uo) NA Recharge Volume (V RE) POLLUTION REMOVAL ZffigX� P Total Suspended Solids *"x x=3r Nutrients - Total Phosphorus/ fr4-� Total Nitrogen Metals Cadmium, Copper, Lead, " and Zinc Pathogens - Coliform, Streptococci- MW.aY a. E. Coli + Toxins Chloride, Hydrocarbon, Pesticide " target pollutants - actual percentage of pollutant removal vanes with Infiltration Screening/ Filtration Temperature Control Settling 4 , ' Evaporation Transpiration x:. Soil Adsorption Biological/ Micro. Uptake POLLUTION REMOVAL ZffigX� P Total Suspended Solids *"x x=3r Nutrients - Total Phosphorus/ fr4-� Total Nitrogen Metals Cadmium, Copper, Lead, " and Zinc Pathogens - Coliform, Streptococci- MW.aY a. E. Coli + Toxins Chloride, Hydrocarbon, Pesticide " target pollutants - actual percentage of pollutant removal vanes with Description: Filtration devices, depending on the design, can treat stormwater to reduce nutrients, sediment, floatables, metals, oil, and/or organic compounds. Different filtration media are used depending on the type of pollutant to be removed. Filter media may be a screen, fabric, activated carbon, perlite, zeolite, or other materials. Often a combination of filter media can be used to target the specific pollutants of interest. These devices differ from the structural stormwater filters described in Chapter 12 in two aspects. First, these devices are proprietary and are designed to fit as an insert into the hydraulic infrastructure (eg. a catch basin). Second, the media material may have unique characteristics which are different from the soil/sand media recommended for general stormwater filtration. Filtration devices have been developed for use in locations such as underground chambers, catch basins, trench drains, and roof drains. The manufacturer specifications should indicate key design parameters such as size, allowable flow rate, allowable pollutant concentrations, and removal efficiency. A bypass should be part of the system to allow high flows to circumvent the filtration device. Performance data are often provided by the manufacturer. Users should review this information to ensure it was provided by an independent source. The MPCA Construction General Permit allows limited use of proprietary devices or "alternative methods." Use of the alternative device as a stand alone BMP must be approved by the MPCA prior to installation. Approval is limited to those devices that achieve approximately 80% removal of total suspended solids. Additionally, the MPCA requires a two-year monitoring plan to measure the actual effectiveness of the method. If a device does not meet this 80% total suspended solids removal requirement, then these devices could be used as pretreatment or supplemental to another stormwater practice. Selection: When selecting or specifying a filtration device, designers should research the following: 1. What are the minimum or maximum drainage areas recommended for the device or method? 2. What flow rates or volumes can the device accommodate? Will accessory structures be necessary to divert high flow around the filtration device? 3. What are the characteristics of the pollutants in the water used for testing? What particle size distribution was tested? Research protocols used for testing. 4. Are pollutant removal tests verified by independent organizations such as USEPA, University of New Hampshire, University of Minnesota, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, or others? 5. Does the device contain a by-pass for high flows? If so, then what is the percentage of flow is prior to by-pass. 6. What are the construction costs? Does the cost include all materials, installation, and delivery? 7. What are the maintenance requirements? What are the costs of the required maintenance? Is there a standard operation and maintenance plan? What is the typical life of the filtration unit? 8. Does the local regulatory authority approve the use of filtration devices? 9. Will the manufacturer provide design computations and CADD details? Chapter 12 -FACT Volume 2 2005 Minnesota Stormwater Manual, Version 1.0 Courtesy of The Green Institute - Minneapolis, MN KEY CONSIDERATIONS Design Criteria: ► Structural load capacity, how much weight the roof can hold, is a major factor in determining whether the green roof is "extensive" or "intensive" (see next page). ► Vegetation selection is based on numerous factors including, growth medium depth, microclirnate, irrigation availability and maintenance. ► A leak detection system is recommended to quickly detect and locate leaks. ► Modular products can increase installation and repair efficiency. Benefits: ► Reduce, delay, and cool stormwater runoff- ► Insulate buildings and lower energy consumption and costs. ► Provide habitat for birds and insects. ► Increase longevity of traditional roofing systems by protecting from ultraviolet rays. ► Reduce carbon dioxide levels and heat island effect. Limitations: ► Cost is higher than traditional roofing systems — can be significant for retrofits. ► Leaks can cause significant damage and can be hard to locate and repair without an electronic leak detection system. ► Conditions can be harsh for vegetation establishment. ► Maintenance needs can be higher than traditional roofing system. GREEN ROOFS Definition: Green roofs consist of a series of layers that create an environment suitable for plant growth without damaging the underlying roof system. Green roofs create green space for public benefit, energy efficiency, and stormwater retention/ detention. 1-F!J11 Water Quality (V,Itl) btud. Channel Protection (V�,,) I ow Civerbank Flood Protection (V t,10 Low Extreme Flood Protection (V ptuu) i. Recharge Volume (Re„) Infiltration '�'rnn agfl.nnnalr. soa ;i rundaiana Screening/ Filtration z Temperature Control Settling Evaporation Transpiration Soil Adsorption Biological/ Micro. Uptake Total Suspended Solids Note: Pollution removal percentages apply to volume of runoff treated, Nutrients - Total Phosphorus: Total Nitrogen Metals- Cadmium, Copper, t -easel, 4- and Zinc F $ ar Pathogens- Coliform, Streptococci, E. Coli z . .r - Toxins - Chloride, Hydrocarbons Pesticides Note: Pollution removal percentages apply to volume of runoff treated, Description: There are two systems of green roofs, extensive and intensive, composed of the same system of layers. Extensive systems are lighter, typically have 4 inches or less of growing medium, use drought tolerant vegetation, and can structurally support limited uses (such as maintenance personnel). Intensive systems are heavier, have a greater soil depth, can support a wider range of plants, and can support increased pedestrian traffic. Rainfall is initially intercepted by vegetation, held on foliage, or soaked up by plant roots. Any remaining runoff filters through the growing medium and is drained away from the roof's surface by the drainage layer. Some drainage systems use small depressions to store excess water for uptake during drier conditions (RCWD 2005), while others provide an overflow for larger rainfall events. 7YPiCAL GREEN ROOF PROFILE CLt'�au4ini' aarwnn.7 r'r,•ddrw naa^r rasa,- ��•ilr u;�'hlaerinu n ail hilt 3rr a,ara r..rr•+".le,..,,.n,..arr:.mria;r r ,rr dn-a. .:. -: .- , ___�✓ till. ip9�/ / ic.T 'Y a r1 iXIII[IM �t►r4 INTENSIVE LYBVdla C'O dtt t, Courtesy of Rite Creek Watershed District C tfT � � r2 N r�_' ' � F • r ark • i � �� .�j � � r� °r' i ROOFTOP Drainage Area rfA Max Slop NA Min. Depth to Bedrock NA Min. Depth to Water Table. SCS Soil Type NA 'can be used In CSD snd Ipos vnU n loddlcnllnns (n d undo,drou) GQ1OD Freeze/(Thaw Suitability SUITABLE Potential Hotspot Runoff 'IefIllllns Inlpn;nl e blc III,or Description: There are two systems of green roofs, extensive and intensive, composed of the same system of layers. Extensive systems are lighter, typically have 4 inches or less of growing medium, use drought tolerant vegetation, and can structurally support limited uses (such as maintenance personnel). Intensive systems are heavier, have a greater soil depth, can support a wider range of plants, and can support increased pedestrian traffic. Rainfall is initially intercepted by vegetation, held on foliage, or soaked up by plant roots. Any remaining runoff filters through the growing medium and is drained away from the roof's surface by the drainage layer. Some drainage systems use small depressions to store excess water for uptake during drier conditions (RCWD 2005), while others provide an overflow for larger rainfall events. 7YPiCAL GREEN ROOF PROFILE CLt'�au4ini' aarwnn.7 r'r,•ddrw naa^r rasa,- ��•ilr u;�'hlaerinu n ail hilt 3rr a,ara r..rr•+".le,..,,.n,..arr:.mria;r r ,rr dn-a. .:. -: .- , ___�✓ till. ip9�/ / ic.T 'Y a r1 iXIII[IM �t►r4 INTENSIVE LYBVdla C'O dtt t, Courtesy of Rite Creek Watershed District C tfT � � r2 N r�_' ' � F • r ark • i � �� .�j � � r� °r' � qtr q :;�-.. � ' • .�'+Ya , •�s. i., ;a r; Raingarden in a commercial development - Stillwater, MN Design Criteria: ► Infiltration requires suitable soils. ► Minimum 10' setback and located clown grade from home foundations. ► Best applied to drainage areas with relatively flat slopes (5%). Benefits: ► Can be very effective for removing fine sediment, trace metals, nutrients, bacteria and organics (Davis el al. 1998). Provides many additional environmental (habitat, improves air quality, urban micro - climates), social ( creates a unique sense of place ) and economic benefits ( reduces development and maintenance cost, greater lot yield, increases property vahjes). ► Well suited for high impervious areas. ► Reduces runoff volume. ► Flexible design, affording many opportunities for creativity. Limitations: ► Susceptible to clogging by sediment; therefore maintenance and pretreatment is necessary to maintain effectiveness. ► Not effective for large drainage areas (use multiple structures, closer to source of runoff). ► Space consumption (5%-10% of drainage area). Definition: Bioretention is a terrestrial -based (up- land as opposed to wetland), water quality and water quantity control process. Bioretention employs a simplistic, site integrated design that provides opportunity for runoff infiltration, filtration, storage and water uptake by vegetation. MANAGEMENT SUITABILITY Water Quality (V,,,o) Channel Protection (V,i,) '1 Overbank Flood Protection (V w Extreme Flood Protection (v a,) 'fft] Recharge Volume (VF,,) Infiltration %vin appropnalc sc.L•; & Erle• co>uLl,rv,:; Filtration Temperature Control x.., Settling Evaporation X Transpiration X Soil Adsorption X Biological/ Micro. Uptake '�4 5 � Total Suspended Solids �a Nutrients - Total Phosphorus/ Tntal NitronPn M-1 M Metals - Cadmium, Copper, lead, and Zinc s � a � Pathogens - Coliform, Streptococci, 1=. Coli 'less th-5=`I:!nrlenc sludcs '_. Toxins - Chloride, Hydrocarbon, - Pesticide`1':.is,t,:,:,:;u,de,;rad:Mns,urf�:-s Note: Average pollutant removal expected when sizing based on MPCA Lino Lakes City Hall - Infiltration trench Bradshaw Celebration of Life Center Lino Lakes, MN - underground storage & infiltration Stillwater. MN Design Criteria: ► Contributing drainage area ► Underlying soil types ► Depth to the water table, bedrock or other impeding layer ► Proximity to buildings, drinking water supplies, karst features, etc... ► Source of stormwater runoff Benefits: ► Reduces volume of stormwater runoff ► Increases groundwater recharge ► Improves surface water quality ► Provides thermal benefits (e.g, to cold water fisheries) ► Mimics pre -development hydrology Limitations: ► Unusual construction considerations ► Potential for groundwater contamination ► Tendency to lose effectiveness over time due to clogging — if not properly constructed or maintained ► Not recommended for areas with steep slopes ► May require landscaping: consideration should be given to periods on inundation and drought Water Quality (V,,) Channel Protection (V CO Overbank Flood Protection (V Pro) Extreme Flood Protection (V P100) Recharge Volume (VRd d ri MECHANISMS Infiltration Screening/ Filtration X Temperature Control Settling Evaporation Transpiration • r vrg,)taied Soil Adsorption Biological/ Micro. Uptake Total Suspended Solids 10, Nutrients - Total Phosphorus/ " Total Nitrogen q Metals - Cadmium. Copper Lead, and Zinc a Pathogens - Coliform. Streptococci, E. Coli Toxins - Chloride, Hydrocarbon, Pesticide 1 2 AC Max: 1 AC " Drainage Area For Filtration Max Impervious Design (Per Puictiae) 2ACMax..112AC Drainage Area l -or Infiltration Max Imlrerv10r+s Design (Per-r@ctice) 20T: Max. Slope of Site �. Min. Depth to Bedrock & Se�i - sonally Hig'� \A/ater Table NRCS Soil Type A,B -Normal •Lan be used in CSD soil lypes ;.,d. n)oilikalions Good Freeze/ Thaw Suitability Suitable Potential Hotspot Runoff - 'I quire: imp Limeable , or Description: In general, bioretention systems can be described as shallow, landscaped depressions commonly located in parking lot islands or within small pockets in residential areas that receive stormwater runoff (Metropolitan Council Small Sites BMP Manual, 2001). Bioretention facilities capture rainwater runoff to be filtered through a prepared soil medium. Once the soil pore space capacity of the medium is exceeded, stormwater begins to pool at the surface of the planting soil. Pollutants are removed by a number of processes including adsorption, filtration, volatilization, ion exchange and decomposition (Prince George's County, MD, 1993). Filtered runoff can either be allowed to infiltrate into the surrounding soil (functioning as an infiltration basin or rainwater garden), or collected by an under -drain system and discharged to the storm sewer system or directly to receiving waters (functioning like a surface sand filter). Runoff from larger storms is generally diverted past the area to the storm drain system (Metropolitan Council Small Sites BMP Manual, 2001). Bioretention is a stormwater treatment practice that utilizes the chemical, biological and physical properties of plants, microbes and soils for capturing/ reducing stormwater runoff and removing pollutants from runoff. This process is often incorporated into many different types of filtration and infiltration stormwater treatment practices. STORM SEQUENCE Start of Storm Event - Initial runoff & storacle uuration of storm tvent- titorage w mirationnntutranon Following Storm Event- Remaining storage draw -down ''roti r, Graphics Courtesv of Rice Creek Watershed District Description: In general terms, infiltration systems can be described as natural or constructed depressions located in permeable soils that capture, store and infiltrate stormwater runoff within 48 hours. These depressions can be located at the surface of the ground (e.g. infiltration basin) or they can be designed as underground facilities (e.g. structural chamber or excavated pit filled with aggregate such as an infiltration trench). Typically, infiltration systems are designed with one or more pre- treatment facilities or they are designed as off-line facilities. Infiltration systems should be located in permeable soils and a minimum 3 -foot distance is REQUIRED from the bottom of the practice to the seasonally high water table, bedrock or other impeding layer per the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Construction General Permit (CGP). Dry wells and Trenches should be designed to handle the smaller, more frequent rainfall events. Stormwater associated with the larger rainfall events should bypass these practices by a separate pipe or an overflow device. Infiltration basins and underground infiltration systems should be designed to handle both the water quality volume and as the water quantity volume. Infiltration systems can be designed to address a number of stormwater management issues including: water quality, stormwater runoff reduction, flow attenuation, thermal impacts to cold water fisheries, and ground water recharge. Duration of Storm Event- Storage & filtration/infiltration Following{ Storm Event- Remaining storage draw -down Courtesy of Rice Creek Watershed District SITE FACTORS •SEQUENCE Drainagr; Areas. Start of Storm Event - Initial runoff & storage 155 50 Ar t,1ax Dry Well/ -french/ Ba:, n Max. Site Slope 3' Min. Depth to Bedrock Min. Depth to Seasonally 3.. High Water Table MRCS Soil Type c, use loll lv l -d I4.t3,G'.$ D' I nlillrll un ab lily but t, n hr usc•J lu 1111101 1'-,3 �� r; ' � I`V fel) 11 L'I ll CUI1cIll 711 �' poor - roes) Freeze/ Thaw Suitability Description: In general terms, infiltration systems can be described as natural or constructed depressions located in permeable soils that capture, store and infiltrate stormwater runoff within 48 hours. These depressions can be located at the surface of the ground (e.g. infiltration basin) or they can be designed as underground facilities (e.g. structural chamber or excavated pit filled with aggregate such as an infiltration trench). Typically, infiltration systems are designed with one or more pre- treatment facilities or they are designed as off-line facilities. Infiltration systems should be located in permeable soils and a minimum 3 -foot distance is REQUIRED from the bottom of the practice to the seasonally high water table, bedrock or other impeding layer per the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Construction General Permit (CGP). Dry wells and Trenches should be designed to handle the smaller, more frequent rainfall events. Stormwater associated with the larger rainfall events should bypass these practices by a separate pipe or an overflow device. Infiltration basins and underground infiltration systems should be designed to handle both the water quality volume and as the water quantity volume. Infiltration systems can be designed to address a number of stormwater management issues including: water quality, stormwater runoff reduction, flow attenuation, thermal impacts to cold water fisheries, and ground water recharge. Duration of Storm Event- Storage & filtration/infiltration Following{ Storm Event- Remaining storage draw -down Courtesy of Rice Creek Watershed District MIZATION PERVIOUS PAVEMENT 4t .1, Grasspave" at Bradshaw Celebration of Life Center -Stillwater, MN Design Criteria: ► Pervious pavement is typically used in low traffic areas including overflow parking areas, emergency vehicle lanes, and pedestrian areas. In-situ soils should have field -verified minimum permeability rates greater than 0.3 in./hr. Contributing runoff from offsite should be limited to a 31 ratio of impervious area to pervious pavement area. ► The selected systems load bearing surface should be suited to maximum intended loads. ► Design storms should be infiltrated within 48 hours. Benefits: ► Good for highly impervious areas particularly parking lots. ► Reduces need for other storm water Bl\/IPs by reducing runoff. Construction costs of some systems are less than traditional paving. ► Soil -enhanced turf systems resist compaction, increase infiltration, and provide .soils for healthier vegetation. Limitations: ► Construction costs of some systems are more expensive than traditional paving 0. Use depends on infiltration rates of underlying soils. ► Maintenance costs are higher than conventional paving. Not recommended for high traffic areas because of durability concerns. Definition: Pervious pavements reduce the amount of runoff by allowing water to pass through surfaces that would otherwise be imperious. Water can either infiltrate into the ground, if soil permeability rates allow, or be conveyed to other BMPs or a storm water system by an under -drain. High' k1pri Nater Quality (V,,,l(,) Med Channel Protection (V c1,) [_a:v Overbank Flood Protection (V,,,,,) Wvv Extreme Flood Protection (V,,,,),,) Flighi Musci Recharge Volurne (Re,,,) MECHANISMS Infiltration -:•.rh apU(opmle sd� candmr))s X. Screening/ Filtration Temperature Control Settling Evaporation X' Transpiration Itvenclal:on pry=_,esil X Soil Adsorption XBiological/ Micro, Uptake Total Suspended Solids 'pi e.tremnienf lot rss IS ra COM[TICI Ided S7 � d, leen(n reA , C- (Irn+n In ),',ement 3 Nutrients - Total Phosphorus/ J�s:1 ✓3ra°-u Total Nitrogen Metals - Cadmiurn, Copper, Le ad, a, l and Zinc Pathogens - Coliform, Streptococci, p E. Coh pr ? Toxins - Chloride, Hydrocarbons, k - _ Pesticides Note: Pollution removal percentages apply to volume of runoff treated, and not to volume of runoff bypassed NA Dr,.iinage Arf :j 2% MAX. Ml ix. Slope 3 ff Min. Depth to Bedrock 3 ft Min. Depth to Water Table SCS Soil Type A,B: nc ;nh. r111,- l •:Icer!!,: GOOD Freeze/ Thaw Suitability - ,%,dh aC1C[pwlC ' Potential Notspot Runoff YES `rogelires imoormeohle 1iner it donhfir 1 ri hoisi;ol "r,F, Description: Pervious pavements can be subdivided into three general categories: 1) Porous Pavements — porous surfaces that infiltrate water across the entire surface (i.e. porous asphalt and porous concrete pavements); 2) Permeable Pavers — impermeable modular blocks or grids separated by spaces or joints that water drains through (i.e. block pavers, plastic grids, etc.); 3) Amended Soils - Fiber or artificial media added to soil to maintain soil structure and prevent compaction. There are many different types of modular porous pavers available from different manufacturers. Pervious pavement systems reduce runoff from impervious surfaces by allowing storm water to pass through the load bearing surface and infill that are selected based upon the intended application and required infiltration rate. Runoff is stored in the stone aggregate base course/ storage layer, if present, and allowed to infiltrate into the surrounding soil (functioning like an infiltration basin), or collected by an under -drain system and discharged to the storm sewer system or directly to receiving waters (functioning like a surface sand filter). Regular maintenance of pervious pavements is necessary to ensure long-term effectiveness. Annual or semi-annual sweeping or vacuuming of surface debris (litter, sediment, etc.) is STRONGLY RECOMMENDED for pavement or pavers. If clogging occurs, the filtration media below the surface may need to be replaced. Manufacturers should be consulted for specific maintenance requirements. Currently, the NIPCA will allow site designers to reduce the water quality volume sizing when using pervious pavement, up to a maxim Urn of 1/2 acre of new impervious surface. The MPCA will not allow pervious pavements as a replacement for water quality treatment BMPs, such as infiltration or filtration practices. Start of Storm Event - Initial runoff & storage Duration of Storm Event- Storage & filtration/infiltration Storm Event - r a raw -a own 4 Y. AN lLinlm e�ki.i � ni.r n'+ .. rtiw�,t . tdi' t RZ'- 1P - llt tni 511 — F{! 1 MUNICIPAL PRACTICES Municipal pollution prevention practices are public operation and maintenance activities and educational efforts implemented by municipal staff that prevent or reduce the contamination of Salt delivery to a Washington County Salt Shed KEY CONSIDERATIONS Description: Municipal pollution prevention practices prevent or reduce stormwater contamination fron) public sources such as streets, parking areas, maintenance vehicles, storm and sanitary sewers, dumpsters, swimming pools and other potential stormwater hotspots. These practices improve subwatershed water quality by minimizing the introduction of pollutants including sediment, nutrients, metals, bacteria, trash, oil, and toxins. Each of these practices is highly suitable and effective in cold climates. Table 12.PREV.3 indicates the pollutants controlled by various municipal pollution prevention practices while Table 12.PREV.4 describes some of the methods used for each of these practices. See Chapter ,13 for further discussion of potential stormwater hotspots. See Photo Credits and References for further information. r. rco Stormwater Pollutants Controlleractice Sediment tNutrients Metals Bacteria 'Trashon Sediment Control • 4 O O Q (� O Wind Erosion control • 0 0~ O 0 O O Streambank Stabilization • O O O O O Material Storage control • Q C) O O • • Dempster and Landfill Nlanagernent (j 0 • • O • Proper Pool Discharge O O 0 O 0 0 • Better Turf Management 0 • O O O O • Bolter Street and Parking Lot cleaning • Better Street and Parking Lot Deicing O 0 (j 0 _ (_) 0 • Proper Vehicle Management • • • O 0 • • Storm Sewer System Maintenance Sanitary Sewer System Maintenance • O� (a 0 O Q 0 • O • O O C3 Litter and Animal Waste Control Public Ecl.icationO Q • O O • 1 • O O 0 � O O Staff and Employee Education O O O ) O O Legivnd O = Uncontrolled 0 = Moderatoly Controlled 0 =Slightly Controlled • = Significantly Controlled Practice Method Temporary Follow local, state, and federal regulatory Construction Sediment requirements for control of erosion during Control construction activities. Institute a local program for wetting of open Wind Erosion Control construction surfaces and other sources for windblown pollutants. [ Emission Regulation Follow local, state, and federal regulatory f requirements for control of air emissions. , Reduce or eliminate spill and leakage loss by properly inspecting, containing, and storing Material Storage hazardous materials and having a cleanup plan Control that can be quickly and efficiently implemented. - Follow NPDES Industrial Permit requirements if permit authority applies. Dumpster and Landfill Ensure that contaminated material is contained ., Management to prevent solid and/or liquid waste from being washed into storm sewer systems or water bodies. Ensure that mowing, fertilization, pesticide application, and irrigation are completed in ` Better Turf ways that will prevent or reduce grass clippings, Management sediment, and chemicals from entering storm sewer systems; use native vegetation where possible. Maintain parking lots frequently and especially Better Parking Lot in the spring and fall by sweeping, picking up Cleaning litter, and repairing deterioration; pressure wash pavement only as needed and minimize the use of cleaning agents. Reduce or eliminate the need for deicing products Better Impervious by manually clearing sidewalks, driveways, _- • -- -�- - Surface Deicing and parking lots prior to deicer use; use environmentally-friendly deicing products when possible, apply sparingly and store properly if used. Proper Vehicle Management Ensure that vehicles are fueled, maintained, washed and stored in a manner that prevents the release of harmful fluids, including oil, antifreeze, gasoline, battery acid, hydraulic and transmission fluids, and cleaning solutions. Regularly clean debris from storm sewer inlets, Storm Sewer System remove sediment from catch basin sumps, and Maintenance remove any illicit connections to storm sewer systems. I Sanitary Sewer Regularly inspect and flush sanitary pipes to System Maintenance ensure that there are no leaks in the system and .. 2 that the system is functioning properly Stillwater, MN Design Criteria (for new construction): Irregularly shaped with minimum length to width ratio of 1.5:1 Permanent pool volume of '1800 cubic feet per acre draining to pond. Permanent pool depth 3' minirnum, 10' maximum at deepest points Extended detention (ED) storage sufficient to treat V,N, Pre-treatment required (sediment forebay sized at 10% of pond area recommended) Stabilized emergency overflow and energy dissipation at all outlets Side slopes not to exceed 1 V:3H Benefits: ► Able to effectively reduce many pollutant loads and control runoff flow rates ► Relatively straightforward design procedure ► Potential wildlife habitat and aesthetic or recreational enhancement ► May be used as temporary sedimentation basin during construction Limitations: Relatively large space requirement Tends to increase water temperature and may cause downstream thermal impact Potential for nuisance insects or odor Problematic for areas of low relief, high water table, or near -surface bedrock > Possible safety concerns 1 A constructed basin situated to receive local stormwater runoff and hold designated volumes of runoff for specified periods of time. The objectives are to improve water quality through settling and biological uptake, and prevent downstream channel degradation or flood damage through storage and outflow rate reduction. Water Quality (V,,,o) Channel Protection (VCP) Cverbank Flood Protection (V P o) Extreme Flood Protection (V pioa) Recharge Volume (VRE) 17- MECHANISMS Infiltration Screening/ Filtration Temperature Control Settling Evaporation Transpiration Soil Adsorption a n<<P(n Y<<' Biological/ Micro. Uptake Total Suspended Solids Nutrients - Total Phosphorus/ Total Nitrogen Metals - Cadmium, Copper, Lead, and Zinc R Pathogens - Coliform, Streptococci, E. Coli Toxins - Chloride, Hydrocarbon, Pesticide ITE FACTORS 'rainage Area AC, iv�Ll'10 AC possible II hym logy capable of ¢uopor' '19 .vn1r I':Vols Max Site Slope h Min. Depth o Bedrock ., fl In 1111;H meas Min Depth to Seasonally High Water Table 'prnld hollom m Ist be above bedlork c.Q tin re+r a NRCS Soil Type 'A and H sods require liners Freeze/ Thaw Suitability Pogr' 'unless adapled Vnlh additional storage for snowmen Description: Stormwater ponds are constructed basins placed in the landscape to capture stormwater runoff. The pond is graded and outlet structures are designed in such a way that specified volumes of water (part or all of the VWQ, VCP, VP10, and VP100) are either held until displaced by future runoff or detained for a specified period of time. While the runoff is being held in the pond, sediment and associated pollutants settle to the bottom. Pollutants can also be removed from the stormwater through microbial, plant and algal biological uptake. Additional stormwater pond storage provided above the VWQ allocation is used to control flows of particular frequencies at pre -development or other specified levels to prevent downstream channel degradation and flood damage. Storage in a stormwater pond can be either permanent pool or extended detention storage. As the name implies, water in the permanent pool is meant to remain in the basin, allowing settling and biological uptake to occur between storms and protecting against sediment resuspension. To maintain a permanent pool over a period of time, the pond must be designed with a sufficiently large drainage area. Extended detention storage refers to the volume above the permanent pool which is controlled by an outlet structure, sized so that runoff from larger storms can be captured and released over a period of time, allowing some settling to occur and keeping flow rates in check. Ponding requirements for new impervious area treatment are mandated in the state Construction General Permit (CGP). It is possible to design a pond with no permanent pool (dry pond, ponded only for a maximum of several days following a storm event), but stormwater ponds used for water quality treatment should be designed with a permanent pool. Dry ponds are highly susceptible to sediment resuspension and generally do not meet water quality performance criteria. However, dry ponds can be employed in some circumstances, such as for supplemental storage when the VWp has already been treated with upstream BMPs. Sediment and pollutant removal in stormwater ponds can be enhanced through the use of multiple cells in succession. In particular, a sediment forebay (pre- treatment basin) sized at 10% of the pond area should be considered upstream of the pond. This allows for settling of heavier materials in a designated area, enhancing the main pond performance and reducing the maintenance burden by concentrating the majority of sediments in one location. It is also possible to design a pond with no extended detention storage (wet pond), in which the only outlet is the spillway and where 100% of the treated volume is within the permanent pool. When a storm occurs, the treated runoff in the pond is displaced by new (untreated) runoff. Wet ponds are able to fulfill water quality treatment requirements, but do not mitigate the channel degradation or flooding effects of increased flow from larger storms. Also, wet ponds are not generally recommended for cold climates because during frozen conditions, runoff can flow over the ice of the permanent pool, effectively negating the benefits of the intended treatment volume. Generally the most desirable pond configuration for Minnesota is a large enough permanent pool to meet water quality needs, and sufficient extended detention to ensure adequate treatment during frozen conditions. Chapter.12-POND Volume 2 2005 Minnesota Stormwater Manual, Version 1.0 Northwestern College Master Plan Northwestern College Roseville and Arden Hills, Minnesota Traffic and Parking Impact Study Submitted: November 15, 2006 Revised: January 18, 2007 Revised: April 24, 2007 Project No. 13529.000 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE MASTER PLAN TRAFFIC AND PARKING IMPACT STUDY TKDA PROJECT NO. 13529.000 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO. I. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................1 II. BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................................1 III. LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINED ...........................................................................................2 IV. EXISTING CONDITIONS .....................................................................................................3 A. Existing Traffic Operations ...........................................................................................3 B. Existing Parking Capacity .............................................................................................6 V. Year 2018 Background Conditions .......................................................................................8 VI. Year 2018 Cumulative Conditions ......................................................................................10 A. Future Campus Expansion Trip Generation and Distribution .....................................11 B. Year 2018 Cumulative Traffic Operating Conditions ..................................................13 C. Recommended Transportation Mitigation Measures ..................................................16 VII. YEAR 2026 CUMULATIVE CONDITIONS .........................................................................19 A. Year 2026 Cumulative Traffic Operating Conditions ..................................................19 B. Year 2026 Parking Conditions ....................................................................................23 VIII. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS .....................................................................................25 APPENDIX PAGES HCM Level of Service Reports ....................................................................................................42 LIST OF TABLES PAGE NO. Table No. 1: Existing Levels of Service and Average Vehicle Delays .......................................5 Table No. 2: Year 2018 Background Levels of Service and Average Vehicle Delays ...............9 Table No. 3: Estimated College Master Plan Trip Distribution .................................................15 Table No. 4: Year 2018 Levels of Service and Average Vehicle Delays with No Roadway Improvements .........................................................................15 Northwestern College Master Plan i 13529.000 Traffic and Parking Impact Study Table No. 5: Year 2018 Peak Hour LOS, Average Delay, and Vehicle Queues with and without Mitigation ..................................................................................18 Table No. 6: Year 2026 Cumulative Levels of Service and Average Vehicle Delays ..............22 LIST OF FIGURES PAGES Figure No. 1: Existing AM and PM Peak Hour Turn Volumes ......................................................4 Figure No. 2: Year 2018 Background AM and PM Peak Turn Volumes .....................................10 Figure No. 3: Net Campus Master Plan AM and PM Peak Trips (2018 Buildout).......................12 Figure No. 4: Year 2018 Cumulative AM and PM Peak Trips .....................................................14 Figure No. 5: Year 2026 Cumulative AM and PM Peak Trips .....................................................21 LIST OF CHARTS PAGE NO. Chart No. 1: Existing Parking Demand vs. Capacity (April 2006).................................................7 Chart No. 2: Year 2026 Projected Parking Demand vs. Supply .................................................24 Northwestern College Master Plan ii 13529.000 Traffic and Parking Impact Study NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE MASTER PLAN TRAFFIC AND PARKING IMPACT STUDY I. INTRODUCTION Founded in 1902 as the Northwestern Bible and Missionary School, Northwestern College is a private, non-denominational Christian College. Northwestern's academic program offers 45 bachelor degrees ranging from elementary education and pastoral studies to broadcasting/electronic media and psychology. In 1949, the College broadened its focus when Twin Cities' radio station KTIS went on the air. Below is an image of the campus as it appears today. II. BACKGROUND The purpose of this Study is to identify the potential traffic and parking impacts of the proposed Northwestern College Campus Master Plan expansion. Traffic and parking analyses were conducted for Existing Conditions, Year 2018 Background Conditions (without Master Plan construction), and Year 2018 Cumulative Conditions (with College Master Plan buildout). Needed roadway improvements are suggested for 2026 Background Conditions and potential College Master Plan mitigation measures are recommended. Northwestern College Master Plan 1 13529.000 Traffic and Parking Impact Study III. LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINED Future traffic operations are analyzed in this Study in terms of levels of service. Level of service (LOS) is an estimate of the quality and performance of transportation facility operations. Methodology outlined in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) is commonly used to determine LOS. (This analysis used Synchro signal timing software to model the study intersections with HCM LOS methodology). The degree of traffic congestion and delay is rated using the letter “A” for the least amount of congestion to the letter “F” for the highest congestion level (i.e., LOS A through LOS F). The following categories provide general descriptions of the different levels of service defined in the HCM: • LOS A represents a free-flow condition. Travel speeds are at or near the speed limit and little to no delay exists. Freedom to select desired speeds and to make turns and maneuver within the traffic stream is very high. Average delays experienced at unsignalized or signalized intersections are less than 10 seconds per vehicle. • LOS B represents a zone of stable flow. Drivers still have reasonable freedom to select their travel speeds. Minor average delays of 10 to 15 seconds per vehicle are experienced at unsignalized intersections, and from 10 to 20 seconds per vehicle for signalized intersections. • LOS C still falls within the zone of stable flow, but travel speeds and vehicle maneuverability are more closely controlled by the higher volumes. The selection of speed is not affected by the presence of other vehicles, and maneuvering within the traffic stream requires vigilance by the driver. Average delays of 15 to 25 seconds per vehicle are experienced at unsignalized intersections and from 20 to 35 seconds for signalized intersections. • LOS D approaches unstable flow. Travel speed and freedom to maneuver are somewhat restricted, with average delays of 25 to 35 seconds per vehicle at unsignalized intersections and from 35 to 55 seconds for signalized intersections. Small increases in traffic flow can cause operational difficulties at this level. Northwestern College Master Plan 2 13529.000 Traffic and Parking Impact Study • LOS E represents operating conditions at or near the capacity of the intersection. Average delays of 35 to 50 seconds per vehicle are experienced at unsignalized intersections and from 55 to 80 seconds at signalized intersections. Freedom to maneuver within the traffic stream is very difficult. Any incident can be expected to produce a breakdown in traffic flow with extensive queuing. • LOS F describes forced flow operation at very low speeds. Operations are characterized by stop-and-go traffic. Long average delays of more than 50 seconds per vehicle occur at unsignalized intersections and of more than 80 seconds per vehicle at signalized intersections. Though there are no hard and fast guidelines in Minnesota for what level of service is considered acceptable, it is typical for an intersection with an overall LOS C to be considered acceptable in rural areas and for an overall LOS D to be acceptable in more urban or developing areas. IV. EXISTING CONDITIONS A. Existing Traffic Operations Turn movement counts for the a.m. and p.m. peak hours were taken in May 2006 and then adjusted for seasonal variation. The resulting a.m. and p.m. peak hour turn volumes are shown in Figure 1. Existing a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic conditions were modeled using Synchro/SimTraffic simulation software. The resulting a.m. and p.m. peak hour levels of service and average vehicle delays for the four study intersections are shown in Table 1. Northwestern College Master Plan 3 13529.000 Traffic and Parking Impact Study Table No. 1: Existing Levels of Service and Average Vehicle Delays 2006 Existing Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Fairview Ave/Lydia Ave Overall LOS/Average Delay (seconds)B - 14 C - 20 Worst Approach LOS/Delay (seconds)SB - C - 16 NB - C - 22 Lydia Ave/College Entrance Overall LOS/Average Delay (seconds)A - 3 C - 18 Worst Approach LOS/Delay (seconds)SB - C - 18 SB - F - 61 Snelling Ave/Lydia Ave Overall LOS/Average Delay (seconds)D - 38 C - 31 Worst Approach LOS/Delay (seconds)EB - E - 66 WB - E - 76 Snelling Ave/County Road C-2 Overall LOS/Average Delay (seconds)B - 13 D - 45 Worst Approach LOS/Delay (seconds)EB - E - 66 EB - F - 97 All study intersections currently operate at acceptable levels of service overall (i.e., LOS D or better) in both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. However, several intersection approaches currently operate below LOS D, including the southbound approach at Lydia Avenue/College Entrance/Lincoln Drive and eastbound approach at Snelling Avenue/County Road C-2 which operate at LOS F during the p.m. peak hour. Vehicles exiting the campus gate in the p.m. peak hour experience about 61 seconds delay on average due to limited gaps in the east-west traffic flow on Lydia Avenue during that period. Also operating below LOS D are the eastbound and westbound approaches of Snelling/Lydia (LOS E in the a.m. and p.m. peak hours, respectively) and the eastbound approach at Snelling/County Road C-2 (LOS E and LOS F in the a.m. and p.m. peak hour, respectively). The existing sight lines at the Lydia Avenue/College entrance/Lincoln Drive intersection are not sufficient for drivers exiting campus to safely perceive oncoming Northwestern College Master Plan 5 13529.000 Traffic and Parking Impact Study Northwestern College Master Plan 6 13529.000 Traffic and Parking Impact Study traffic from either direction; this is due to the presence of trees and brush on campus property to the east and west of the main gate entrance, and an earthen berm obscuring sight lines to the east. B. Existing Parking Capacity Currently there are about 1,400 parking spaces on the Northwestern College campus north of Lydia Avenue. Estimates of peak parking demand were made based on hourly vehicle counts collected via the 48-hour traffic tube counts taken in April 2006. Chart No. 1 depicts the hourly parked vehicle totals versus the overall parking capacity of 1,400 spaces. Peak demand is estimated to occur between 12:15 and 12:30 p.m. on a typical weekday and consists of about 1,365 parked vehicles, or 97% of parking capacity. w e s te r n Co l l eg e M a s t e r P l a n 7 135 29.0 00 r af f i c a n d P a r k in g I m p a c t S t u d y Ch a r t N o . 1 : Ex i s t i n g P a r k i n g D e m a n d v s . C a p a c i t y ( A p r il 2 0 0 6 ) 0 20 0 40 0 60 0 80 0 10 0 0 12 0 0 14 0 0 16 0 0 8: 00 AM 8: 30 AM 9: 0 0 AM 9: 30 AM 10 : 00 AM 10 : 30 AM 11 : 0 0 AM 11 : 30 AM 12 : 00 PM 12 : 3 0 PM 1: 0 0 PM 1: 30 PM 2: 00 PM 2: 3 0 PM3:00 PM3:30 PM4:00 PM P a r k e d V e h i c l e s Pa r k ed V eh i c l e s T o ta l P a r k in g S p a c e s No r t h T V. YEAR 2018 BACKGROUND CONDITIONS Year 2018 Background conditions are the projected traffic conditions without including traffic generated from campus expansion. Future traffic projections were based on historic growth trends in traffic volumes along study area roadways. The assumed growth rates ranged from 0.59% per year on Lydia Avenue west of Snelling Avenue to 1.31% per year on Lydia Avenue east of Snelling Avenue. Average annual growth on Snelling Avenue was assumed to be 1.04% based on an average of growth rates observed on Snelling Avenue north and south of the study area. These growth rates were applied to 2006 turn movement volumes to derive Year 2018 Background peak hour turn volumes shown in Figure 2. Year 2018 background levels of service and average vehicle delays are shown in Table 2. By Year 2018 overall intersection operating conditions at Snelling Avenue/Lydia Avenue will drop to LOS E and F, respectively, in the a.m. and p.m. peak hours due to rapid growth in background traffic levels. Snellng Avenue/County Road C-2 will drop to LOS E during the p.m. peak hour. All other study intersections will continue to operate at the same as existing levels of service during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Northwestern College Master Plan 8 13529.000 Traffic and Parking Impact Study Table No. 2: Year 2018 Background Levels of Service and Average Vehicle Delays 2006 Existing Conditions 2018 Background Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Fairview Ave/Lydia Ave Overall LOS/Average Delay (seconds) B - 14 C - 20 B - 15 C - 20 Worst Approach LOS/Delay (seconds) SB - C - 16 NB - C - 22 SB - C - 16 NB - C - 23 Lydia Ave/College Entrance Overall LOS/Average Delay (seconds) A - 3 C - 18 A - 3 C - 18 Worst Approach LOS/Delay (seconds) SB - C - 18 SB - F - 61 SB - C - 18 SB - F - 61 Snelling Ave/Lydia Ave Overall LOS/Average Delay (seconds) D - 38 C - 31 E - 55 F - 90 Worst Approach LOS/Delay (seconds) EB - E - 66 WB - E - 76 SB - E - 70 NB - F - 124 Snelling Ave/County Road C-2 Overall LOS/Average Delay (seconds) B - 13 D - 45 B - 10 E - 64 Worst Approach LOS/Delay (seconds) EB - E - 66 EB - F - 97 WB - E - 63 NB - F - 100 Northwestern College Master Plan 9 13529.000 Traffic and Parking Impact Study VI. YEAR 2018 CUMULATIVE CONDITIONS A. Future Campus Expansion Trip Generation and Distribution Year 2018 Cumulative Conditions represent projected traffic operations with background growth and campus expansion. Future trip generation due to campus expansion and corresponding increases in student enrollment, faculty, and staff, was estimated for the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. These estimates were based on existing hour-by-hour gate counts taken in April 2006 which were used to calculate the current rate of peak hour trips per total commuter students, faculty and staff. This calculated rate was then applied to the projected future year commuter student, faculty, and staff populations to derive trip generation totals. Incoming and outgoing trips were determined based on the two-directional gate count data. The total net increases in campus-related turn volumes at Master Plan buildout are shown in Figure No. 3. Northwestern College Master Plan 11 13529.000 Traffic and Parking Impact Study A net increase of 238 a.m. peak hour trips and 365 p.m. peak hour trips are anticipated from campus expansion at buildout. The distribution of campus-generated trips was estimated based on existing commuter student, faculty and staff residential zip codes. Estimated distribution percentages for commuter students and college faculty and staff are shown in Table 3. B. Year 2018 Cumulative Traffic Operating Conditions Estimated Year 2018 cumulative traffic turn volumes are shown in Figure 4. The results of the future traffic analysis with campus expansion and no roadway improvements are summarized in Table 4. The net differences between 2018 Cumulative Conditions and 2018 Background Conditions represents the impact of the Northwestern College Campus Expansion. As shown in Table 4, the most significant impacts of the expansion are projected to occur at Fairview Avenue/Lydia Avenue and at the College entrance at the intersection with Lydia Avenue and Lincoln Drive. At Fairview Avenue/Lydia Avenue future p.m. peak hour traffic operations would fall to LOS D overall, and the southbound approach would drop to LOS E in part due to campus-generated traffic moving through the intersection. At Lydia Avenue/College entrance overall operations would fall to LOS F with the southbound (College outbound) approach operations falling to LOS F with nearly eight minutes of delay per vehicle. The Snelling Avenue intersections could be expected to operate about the same in 2018, with or without the college expansion. Northwestern College Master Plan 13 13529.000 Traffic and Parking Impact Study Table No. 3: Estimated College Master Plan Trip Distribution Fairview Ave Snelling Ave I-35W Lydia Ave CR - C-2 Co. Rd. C North South North South North South East East East West Total Commuter Students 5.4% 8.3% 15.7%31.4%24.1%5.6% 4.4% 1.4% 2.3% 1.4%100.00% College Staff/Emp's 7.2% 6.8% 15.3%22.6%26.9%5.1% 9.9% 2.2% 2.4% 1.6%100.00% Table No. 4: Year 2018 Levels of Service and Average Vehicle Delays with No Roadway Improvements 2018 Background Conditions 2018 Cumulative Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Fairview Ave/Lydia Ave Overall LOS/Average Delay (seconds) B - 15 C - 20 C - 18 D - 35 Worst Approach LOS/Delay (seconds) SB - C - 16 NB - C - 23 SB - C - 22 SB - E - 41 Lydia Ave/College Entrance Overall LOS/Average Delay (seconds) A - 3 C - 18 A - 6 F - 150 Worst Approach LOS/Delay (seconds) SB - C - 18 SB - F - 61 NB - E - 39 SB - F - 465 Snelling Ave/Lydia Ave Overall LOS/Average Delay (seconds) E - 55 F - 90 E - 55 F - 87 Worst Approach LOS/Delay (seconds) SB - E - 70 NB - F - 124 SB - E - 69 WB - F - 142 Snelling Ave/County Road C-2 Overall LOS/Average Delay (seconds) B - 10 E - 64 B - 11 E - 64 Worst Approach LOS/Delay (seconds) WB - E - 63 NB - F - 100 WB - E - 64 NB - F - 100 Northwestern College Master Plan 15 13529.000 Traffic and Parking Impact Study C. Recommended Transportation Mitigation Measures To improve operating conditions under Year 2018 Cumulative Conditions (i.e., Campus Master Plan full buildout case) several transportation system improvements will be required. While many of these measures are needed as a result of future background traffic alone, future increases in College-related traffic will also contribute to the traffic conditions requiring mitigation. There is currently no public funding identified in either the County or City Capital Improvement Plans for any of the recommended improvements. It is recommended that the College will participate in funding the following mitigation measures to a level proportionate to the amount of traffic added to the public system as a result of the campus expansion. The proportion will be defined based on the campus expansion-generated trip movements (shown in Figure 3) divided by future year total cumulative trip movements through the intersection or street section to be improved (as shown in Figure 4 for Year 2018). The following mitigation measures are recommended to improve Year 2018 peak hour traffic operations: 1. Implementing a traffic signal at Fairview Avenue/Lydia Avenue with an exclusive southbound left turn lane of 250 feet. 2. Directing outbound right turns and inbound left turns to and from the west via the Northwestern College west gate during the p.m. peak hour and adding an eastbound 150-foot left turn lane at the west gate and appropriate berming on the south side of the intersection to accommodate inbound left turns from the west and to mitigate potential impacts from car headlights to residential properties to the south. 3. Adding an exclusive 150-foot westbound right turn lane at Lydia/College entrance to facilitate safe maneuvers for college-bound vehicles (the College should dedicate the right-of-way required on the north side of Lydia Avenue to accommodate the new lane). 4. One additional exclusive eastbound left turn lane at Snelling Avenue/Lydia Avenue with left turn lanes extended to 200 feet (the College should dedicate Northwestern College Master Plan 16 13529.000 Traffic and Parking Impact Study the right-of-way required on either side of Lydia Avenue to accommodate the new lanes). 5. One additional exclusive eastbound left turn lane at Snelling Avenue/County Road C-2 with left turn lanes extended to 200 feet. 6. Develop Travel Demand Management (TDM) Plan to implement institutional measures that would further improve future peak hour traffic operations. Table 5 shows Year 2018 performance measures under background, cumulative, and mitigated cumulative conditions. With the physical mitigation measures in place (measures one through five above), traffic operations would improve significantly at the Lydia Avenue/Fairview Avenue and Lydia Avenue/College entrance intersections. At Lydia/Fairview overall operating conditions would improve from LOS D to LOS B in the p.m. peak hour and at Lydia/College entrance the overall intersection improves from LOS F to LOS B; the southbound approach for vehicles exiting campus would continue to operate at LOS F, but at a much reduced average delay of only 51 seconds, just beyond the LOS E threshold of 50 seconds. At Snelling Avenue/Lydia Avenue traffic operations would remain at LOS E for the a.m. and p.m. peak hours, even after the recommended physical mitigation measures have been implemented. In addition, the SimTraffic analysis shows very long northbound and southbound queues occurring at the Snelling/Lydia and Snelling/CR C-2 intersections for all 2018 scenarios. While the northbound p.m. peak hour queue at Snelling/CR C-2 may be somewhat overstated (due to the fact that Snelling/CR C intersection was not modeled and in reality would meter the northbound flow and result in shorter queues at CR C-2) there are no reasonable mitigation measures available short of constructing grade-separated interchanges that would improve Snelling Avenue corridor operations. This high-cost and high-impact improvement was not included in the traffic analysis as it was not considered to be a financially- feasible or politically-viable solution. Northwestern College Master Plan 17 13529.000 Traffic and Parking Impact Study Table No. 5: Year 2018 Peak Hour LOS, Average Delay, and Vehicle Queues with and without Mitigation 2018 Background Conditions 2018 Cumulative Conditions 2018 Cumulative Conditions with Mitigation1 HCM LOS/Average Delay HCM LOS/Average Delay HCM LOS/Average Delay AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Fairview Ave/Lydia Ave Overall LOS/Average Delay (seconds) B - 15 C - 20 C - 18 D - 35 B - 17 B - 14 Worst Approach LOS/Delay (seconds) SB - C - 16 NB - C - 23 SB - C - 22 SB - E - 41 WB - C - 33 WB - D - 38 SimTraffic Max. Queue (feet) SB - 230 SB - 455 SB - 230 NB - 467 WB - 220 SB - 310 SimTraffic Worst Avg. Queue (feet) SB - 125 SB - 175 SB - 120 SB - 196 WB - 134 NB - 142 Lydia Ave/College Entrance Overall LOS/Average Delay (seconds) A - 3 B - 18 A - 6 F - 150 A - 3 B - 15 Worst Approach LOS/Delay (seconds) SB - C - 18 SB - F - 61 NB - E - 39 SB - F - 465 NB - C - 20 SB - F - 51 SimTraffic Max. Queue (feet) SB - 52 SB - 265 EB - 140 SB - 1455 SB - 65 SB - 260 SimTraffic Worst Avg. Queue (feet) SB - 20 SB - 80 EB - 46 SB - 890 NB - 22 SB - 100 Snelling Ave/Lydia Ave Overall LOS/Average Delay (seconds) E - 55 F - 90 E - 55 F - 87 E - 55 E - 71 Worst Approach LOS/Delay (seconds) SB - E - 70 NB - F - 124 SB - E - 69 WB - F - 142 SB - E - 69 NB - F - 92 SimTraffic Max. Queue (feet) SB - 4250 NB - 1255 SB - 4240 NB - 1250 SB - 4230 NB - 1240 SimTraffic Worst Avg. Queue (feet) SB - 3830 NB - 1010 SB - 3600 NB - 1000 SB - 3790 NB - 1140 Snelling Ave/County Road C-2 Overall LOS/Average Delay (seconds) B - 10 E - 64 B - 11 E - 64 B - 12 D - 38 Worst Approach LOS/Delay (seconds) WB - E - 63 NB - F - 100 WB - E - 64 NB - F - 100 EB - E - 67 WB - F - 98 SimTraffic Max. Queue (feet) NB - 260 NB - 2490 NB - 260 NB - 2470 NB - 300 NB - 2480 SimTraffic Worst Avg. Queue (feet) NB - 130 NB - 2400 NB - 150 NB - 2440 NB - 170 NB - 2420 1 Assumed transportation mitigation improvements include: 1) adding a second eastbound exclusive left turn lane at Snelling/Lydia with left turn lanes extended to 200 feet; 2) adding a second eastbound left turn lane at Snelling/CR C-2 with left turn lanes extended to 200 feet; 3) directing outbound right and inbound left turns to/from the west via the College west gate during the p.m. peak period; and 4) adding an exclusive 150-foot westbound right turn lane at Lydia Ave/Lincoln Drive (College main gate); 5) adding new signal at Lydia Ave/Fairview Ave with exclusive southbound 150-foot left turn lane. Northwestern College Master Plan 18 13529.000 Traffic and Parking Impact Study Through the development and implementation of the TDM Plan recommended above, further reductions in average delay and queuing at the Lydia Avenue/College entrance, and other study intersections, could be achieved. Examples of some promising measures include: 1. Instituting staggered class hours during the p.m. peak period (4:00 to 6:00 p.m.) and 2. Delaying the start times for the adult evening classes. The full benefit of these TDM measures would require further analysis beyond the scope of this Study, but it is plausible that the resulting benefits could offset the need to direct traffic via the west gate during the p.m. peak hour. VII. YEAR 2026 CUMULATIVE CONDITIONS A. Year 2026 Cumulative Traffic Operating Conditions A Year 2026 cumulative conditions scenario was analyzed in addition to the Year 2018 scenarios. Year 2026 cumulative traffic volumes were derived by applying the same annual percentage growth rates applied previously and adding potential peak hour trips from anticipated development in the area to Year 2018 cumulative traffic volumes. Applications for the previously proposed Twin Lakes mixed use development (between County Roads C and C-2 and between Fairview and Lincoln Avenues) have been denied by the City of Roseville, but potential peak hour trips from the project were included in the calculation of 2026 volumes as an example of what ultimately could be developed in this area. That development was expected to generate a net increase of 4,040 a.m. and 6,250 p.m. peak hour trips by Year 2020. These trips were distributed to the modeled roadway network based on the distribution assumed in the Twin Lakes Alternative Urban Area Review Traffic Study. Year 2026 conditions assumed the transportation system mitigation measures recommended for improving 2018 cumulative conditions. Estimated Year 2026 cumulative traffic turn volumes are shown in Figure No. 5. The results of the future traffic analysis are summarized in Table No. 6. By 2026 all study intersections will have overall or approach levels of service at LOS E or F, with the exception of Fairview Avenue/Lydia Avenue and Lydia Avenue/College entrance in Northwestern College Master Plan 19 13529.000 Traffic and Parking Impact Study the a.m. peak hour. The Snelling Avenue/Lydia Avenue intersection is projected to operate at LOS F in both peak hours and the Snelling/Avenue/County Road C-2 intersection is projected to operate at LOS E in both peak hours. There are no reasonable mitigation measures available short of constructing grade-separated interchanges that would improve these Snelling Avenue intersections. This high-cost and high-impact improvement was not included in the traffic analysis as it was not considered to be a financially-feasible or politically-viable solution. The Lydia Avenue/College entrance southbound approach is projected to operate at LOS F in the p.m. peak hour; however, this analysis did not account for the significant benefits that could be achieved from implementing the TDM mitigation measures described earlier, and better levels of service could reasonably be achieved through the TDM plan. The Fairview Avenue/Lydia Avenue intersection operations would fall to LOS E overall in the p.m. peak hour with LOS F operations for the northbound approach. This could be remedied with the addition of a northbound exclusive 150-foot right turn lane which would bring overall operations back to LOS C with no approaches or movements falling below LOS D. Northwestern College Master Plan 20 13529.000 Traffic and Parking Impact Study w e s te r n Co l l eg e M a s t e r P l a n 22 135 29.0 00 r af f i c a n d P a r k in g I m p a c t S t u d y Ye a r 2 0 1 8 C u m u l a t i v e -M i t i g a t e d Co n d i t i o n s 1 Ye a r 2 0 2 6 C u m u l a t i v e C onditions AM P e a k Ho ur PM P e a k H o ur AM P e a k Ho ur PM Peak Ho ur Fa i r v i e w A v e/ L y di a A v e Ov e r a l l L O S / Av e r a g e De l a y ( s e c on d s) B - 1 7 B - 1 4 C - 2 3 E - 58 Wo rs t A p p r oa ch L O S / De l a y ( s e c on d s ) WB - C - 3 3 WB - D - 3 8 WB - D - 3 7 NB - F - 94 L y d i a A v e/ C o l l e g e E n t r a n ce Ov e r a l l L O S / Av e r a g e De l a y ( s e c on d s) A - 3 B - 1 5 A - 3 E - 49 Wo rs t A p p r oa ch L O S / De l a y ( s e c on d s) NB - C - 2 0 SB - F - 5 1 NB - D - 2 6 SB - F - 217 Sn e l l i n g A v e/ L y di a A v e Ov e r a l l L O S / Av e r a g e De l a y ( s e c on d s) E - 5 5 E - 7 1 F - 9 6 F - 109 Wo rs t A p p r oa ch L O S / De l a y ( s e c on d s) SB - E - 6 9 NB - F - 9 2 SB - F - 1 2 8 NB - F - 167 Sn e l l i n g A v e/ C o u n t y R o a d C - 2 Ov e r a l l L O S / Av e r a g e De l a y ( s e c on d s) B - 1 2 D - 3 8 E - 6 7 E - 61 Wo rs t A p p r oa ch L O S / De l a y ( s e c on d s ) EB - E - 6 7 WB - F - 9 8 SB - F - 8 7 WB - F - 124 1 A s s u m e d t r a n s p o r t a t i o n m i t i g a t i o n i m pr o v e m en t s i n cl u de : 1 ) a d di n g a s e c o n d e a s t b ou n d ex c l u s iv e l e f t t u r n l a n e a t S ne l l i n g / L y d i a with left tu r n l a n e s e x t e n d e d t o 2 0 0 fe e t ; 2 ) a d d i n g a s e co n d e a st b o un d l e ft t u r n l a n e a t S ne l l i n g / CR C - 2 w i t h l e f t t u r n l a n e s e x t e n ded t o 200 fe et; 3) di r e ct i n g o u t b ou n d r i gh t a n d i n b o u nd l e f t t u r n s t o / f r o m t h e w e s t v i a t h e C o l l eg e w e s t g a t e d u ri n g t h e p . m . p e a k p e ri o d ; a n d 4) addi ng a n ex c l u s iv e 1 5 0 -f o o t w e st b o u nd r i g h t t u r n l a n e at L y d i a Av e / L i n c o l n Dr i v e ( C o l l e g e m a i n g a t e ); 5 ) a d d i ng n e w s i g na l a t L y d i a A v e / Fairview Ave wi t h e x c l u s iv e s o u t h bo u nd 1 5 0 - f o o t l e f t t u r n l a n e . TA B L E N o . 6: Ye a r 2 0 2 6 C u m u l a t i v e L e v e l s o f S e r v i c e a n d A v e r a g e V e hi c l e D e l a y s No r t h T Northwestern College Master Plan 23 13529.000 Traffic and Parking Impact Study B. Year 2026 Parking Conditions By 2018 a total of about 2,090 parking spaces are planned with the buildout of the Northwestern College Master Plan. Estimates of Year 2026 peak parking demand were made based on projected populations of students, faculty and staff and existing person-to-parked-vehicle ratios. Chart No. 2 depicts the hourly parked vehicle totals versus the overall parking capacity of 2,090 spaces. Peak demand would likely occur between 12:15 and 12:30 p.m. on a typical weekday and is estimated to be about 1,950 parked vehicles; this level of demand can be accommodated through the implementation of the Master Plan with a surplus capacity of about 7%. w e s te r n Co l l eg e M a s t e r P l a n 24 135 29.0 00 r af f i c a n d P a r k in g I m p a c t S t u d y Ch a r t N o . 2 : Ye a r 2 0 2 6 P r o j e c t e d P a r k i n g D e m a n d v s . S u p p l y T o t a l s p a c es = 20 8 9 0 20 0 40 0 60 0 80 0 10 0 0 12 0 0 14 0 0 16 0 0 18 0 0 20 0 0 22 0 0 8:00 A M 8 :3 0 A M 9:00 A M 9:30 A M 1 0 :0 0 A M 1 0:3 0 A M 11 :0 0 A M 1 1 :3 0 A M 1 2:0 0 P M 12 :3 0 P M 1 :0 0 P M 1:30 P M 2:00 P M 2 :3 0 P M 3:00 P M 3:30 P M 4 :0 0 P M P a r k e d V e h i c l e s Pa r k ed V e hi c l es T o t a l P a r k in g S p a c es No r t h T VIII. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS The purpose of this Study is to identify the potential traffic and parking impacts of the proposed Northwestern College Campus Master Plan expansion. The following conclusions summarize the results of this Study: A. By Year 2018 overall intersection operating conditions at Snelling Avenue/Lydia Avenue and Snelling Avenue/County Road C-2 will drop to LOS F and E, respectively, in the p.m. peak hour due to rapid growth in background traffic levels. B. Existing and future year conditions dictate the need to correct for insufficient sight lines at the intersection of Lydia Avenue/Lincoln Drive (College entrance); removal of trees, brush, and berms will be needed to provide adequate sight distances for vehicles exiting the campus. C. Neighborhood concerns about near campus spillover parking on local streets east of Snelling Avenue should be alleviated with implementation of the Master Plan; the parking analysis demonstrates that future peak parking demand will be accommodated by new parking ramps constructed on campus. D. Specific measures to mitigate traffic-related impacts of Year 2018 Cumulative Conditions with Master Plan buildout are recommended, including the following: 1. Implementing a traffic signal at Fairview Avenue/Lydia Avenue with an exclusive southbound left turn lane of 250 feet. 2. Directing outbound right turns and inbound left turns to and from the west via the Northwestern College west gate during the p.m. peak hour and adding an eastbound 150-foot left turn lane at the west gate and appropriate berming on the south side of the intersection. 3. Adding an exclusive westbound right turn lane at Lydia/College entrance to facilitate safe maneuvers for college-bound vehicles. 4. Adding one new exclusive eastbound left turn lane at Snelling Avenue/Lydia Avenue with left turn lanes extended to 200 feet. Northwestern College Master Plan 25 13529.000 Traffic and Parking Impact Study 5. Adding one new exclusive eastbound left turn lane at Snelling Avenue/County Road C-2 with left turn lanes extended to 200 feet. 6. Develop Travel Demand Management (TDM) Plan to implement institutional measures that would further improve future peak hour traffic operations. Northwestern College Master Plan 26 13529.000 Traffic and Parking Impact Study APPENDIX HCM Level of Service Reports B UU UFEAND HEALTH RTNESS CENTER NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE . ,.,.. ~"'"':- o CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT JANUARY 1986 TOLTZ KING DUVALL ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES INC. PROGRAM SPACE SUIlolARY The proposed plan contains the following gross square footage, by level: . Level A!Offlce, Classroom, Storage 14,650 34,050 . Gymnasium (Level Al . Level B/Lockers, Racquetball and Mechanical 20,500 12,400 4.400 . Entry, Control, Clrc. and Lounge . Mechanical Penthouse Total GSF 86,000 The Program Assignable Space (ASFl totals 13,000 which Is 85 percent of the gross building area. I NOI V I DUAL SPACE SUIlolARY The programmed facilities and areas Include: Level (Al . GYMNAS IUM The gymnasium contains four full-size basketball courts, a 160- meter track, bleacher seating for 2000 and features a multi-use synthetic floor surface. The basketball courts can also be used for volleyball and badmltTen. . STORAGE (Gymnasium) Equipment storage Is available within the gymnasium and Is also accessible from the exterior playing fields. . . SUPERVISION OFFICE (Gymnasluml The Supervisor's office has visual access to both gymnasium and atrium space for activity supervision and control within the facility. TROPHY AREA The Trophy Area Is a display area for trophies, awards and commemorative plaques, etc. . TI CKETI NG The ticketing counter Is a multi-functional space within 1he lobby. It is the place for sale of event tickets and also the Information and Building Control Desk. 2 8453 . QASSROOM The classroom has a capacity of 75 persons and can be partitioned off to create two classrooms. . CXlNFERENCE AND SEMINAA ROOM Th I s I s a room to be used for sma II group meetl ngs, semi oars and office meetings. . OFFICES The offices for coaches and athletic directors are oriented toward Little Lake Johanna. The offices are also grouped around the shared functions such as the workroom, Video room and toilet facilIties. All offices have access to the secretary, reception and a conference and seminar room and focus on the main entrance. LEVEL eB) . RACQUETBALL/HANDBALL COURTS There are three racquetball courts one of which has a glass end wall for observation to be used for exhibItion and teaching. . WEIGHT ROOM The weight room presents a quality environment for exercise wlth-- exterior exposure which provides a vIew and the opportunity for fresh air ventilation during temperate times of the year. Also, It Is highly visible from the corridors and Intramural office. . TRAINING ROOM The training room Is centrally located within the locker complex for equal access by men, women and members of varsity sports and equipment managers. . ISSUE/STORAGE/LAUNDRY This has close proximity to lockers for equipment Issue and access to the training room. . WH IRLPOOL The whirlpool Is directly adjacent to the training room for the purpose of control and supervision by training personnel. . VISITING LOCKER ROOMS The v I s I tors I locker rooms can be used as two separate locker rooms or as a single team locker facility allowing access from one side to the other for coaches or team members. The locker facility also has direct exterior access. . MEN I S LOCKER ROOMS This part of the locker facIlity Is divided Into two parts. Men's VarsIty and Men's Physical Education and Intramural lockers. Both have accessibility to the future pool, as well as direct access to the outdoors. 3 8453 . WOMEN'S LOCKER ROOMS Access to future pool has been built Into the plan, as well as ample space for separatIon of Varsity athletes and physical education and Intramural sports users. . VIP LOCKER ROOMS The VIP.locker rooms wIll be used by faculty, visitors, and game officials. Most Importantly, the room wll I be avaIlable to Northwestern College alumni wishIng to use the LIfe and Health/Fitness Center facilItIes. . LOUNGE The lounge Is a place for alumnI, students, vIsitors, and staff to Interact, study or relax. The lounge looks out upon the recreational green and the forest whIch borders Little Lake Johanna. 4 8453 SITE RESPONSE The general location of the LIfe and Health/Fitness Center was established based on the location of existing and proposed athletic fields, the existing and proposed campus road system and existing and proposed routes of pedestrian movement. Offices and the Level B Entry are oriented to the north for best use of the view allowing the gymnaslllll and lockers closer proximity to playing fields. . A transition from the wild lake side to the controlled campus Interior grounds Is achieved by providing a physical and visual passage below and around the administrative office wing. The passage opens upon a recreational and study green which borders the forest surrounding Little Lake Johanna. . It was determined early In the planning process that only a IIlnllllll number of parking spaces (30) could be provided Immediately adjacent to the Life and Health Fitness Center. Event parking wll I have to be accommodated on a campus wide basis. 5 8453 .-:.~.....::---_.__. I' '.>-..----- I~ ". >~_-=:~ '~- ~ Il 0 0 -'!'7r ! ~fjll{ '1;----- _ .,..- - r;:::: ::..< LEVEL A . , '/,/ %/' .. j...J_.f. -or - ---==~: . " _m......L _.._..--====-~ ---, ~ 1 {--------.)O 0 .~ f f' ~ I " o uu / '-, (I ') +0 ....""'..1lCa "ClIIAOI ----~ ~ 9 " 0'. , '" ...--~ I - 1 1 ENTRY. "I 1 I 1 , 'r-~_Ol :' " ,.,. 11 " ~ .. q , I , ,-, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .'K '_..' 'r--i.j1 8453 B UU ,.. " ..:.:~.. "~'\::.. o " " u u OU'MOil .....,.. '"' _I~_..... /6 / / / /0 / / / / , o o /0 / --------.., I I I I I I I I I ""..Not.. --- _w~ ..- - - I I I I I I I I ~ ') I I I I ~-------....., ~--------------- ....c.a..",IO..-.cr r- - - -- , , I I I .J LEVEL B 'r--iJiJ 10 8453 B UU Conceptual Building Plans for New Residence Hall - Previous PUD i I EAST ELEVATION ~~~---O~= , . u" -- m m m m m .lliD ti:fD Ijl 1il..lll_~_~~~JlJt~_~ "ILir.ti:i:i:r . NORTH ELEV A TJON TRANSVERSE SECTION r--t.rU 11 8453 I -J I , , t ! I ~ ' 'f= I r m { l .~'" 1 1 , PARKINq ZI ,." III .. .. '" a; .,.. ".';">,"' 114'-0 7"~ 05'-0 tr~ ." I ;: ~' LOUNGE: a! .. "'" .:, a . T.Y. LOUNGE: .. . .. .. 1 o .. . . ~----"~-~---io. .. . ... .. . . '-;S'-o - ~ '. ~YU .i!tj '-g" ~r~ SCAU""""'ll':1 118 flil! I Il!!ll ~~l ",l '. I' M~! iLl;;, I I.;".~j~.. I O~ r~ ~~ >,~, e ~w Of! a;:fI) Q) OJ ..... '" If.I) ~ OJ w ~ ~- ~ '" ...... ~ ~ fI) o ,~~ ~ ~~;~ 'mU GROUND FLOOR PlAN ...."'."...~~41 '-&I'" ~ l 1 .. .. " a; AEROBIC' HECH 111 1 i i , 1. 140_Q It.fi.APART ~ I I : ..AIN ,OUNG:< 1 ST ,OE I I t....-o "ARKlfrllQ, ze T J ~ ;, OUND PARKING PLAN UNDERGR , . I I li. I ~ 711'-0 64."0 .,., ~./ ~ o ~ ~ ~ (f) j I b 5 ! ii.U . I 1:1 :I: ! () tt I < Ii. U. 0:. Og f--'~'"' I 0,gJj . a:: 5; w ~~ I- a~ ..J at ~R~ ;> ~~ ~-, " -,- -~ . ! i~: .. .. i , i' ;'';y,-.. , f_k.. - ~~ .~ , if ~~ l ~ ~- .~~ ,."",'.:1,"" . ~~~"'4 .~ f.! . -'" ~ o '.. .. ~ U "l!i'l WUL TI-PURP08E '-~-' ~. T":) ~ CHAml '~~~.c'!:!M~ .,.~.-~ - *.~ ""if . ~."!~ , -h.:.. ~ Lm!ltARY " ; . . ':- 'i. . , " '. { 1.fIO:PE~, IIAU~,~~GE ~. · SECOND f''-OO~' PLAN ..' ~1! STUDY LAiiGE -IIEET1N 8TUilc\;' ~ THIRD FLOOR PLAN 8CA!..E: f-II '! ~;"",~,. ~ o 2 z ~ " en II ~ ~ o L W t !:: J: U '1:": Cl: u. u. a.:z o ~.. ~ ut; cn_~~ tX ~i: W<l~ &- ~~ ..J ;: o ~~ ~ E~ :;f - .-:. 'I!' 's! I!!~ I'" "I il': ill , 1111' It! I f I ~ l I ;d ..;.,_';\ ~.i:' ~Ilt- cog Qt.~ I~~ IU ;;.l;J ~,',~ S. 2!ffi :oe 11:", Q.l ., OJ _ 'Ill: tI:l ~ OJ &Ii, ~ ~ r;S ~ ~ '" o ~. Z If '~.lqfll)4 '~1c- ...... 4 ~ SCALE:1-.1S'-O _.' A-5 . . 'OUTLINE SPECIF~CATION 1. GENERAL Project will be designed and constructed to meet or exceed all applicable local and state codes. All necessary permits and/or licenses will be provided. 2. SITE Entire site will be developed including walks, curbing, driveways. All unpaved <!rea will be landscaped with trees and shrubs indiginous 'to the. climate. P<!rking level will be concrete floor.' 3. STRUCTURE Substructure as required by soils engineer report. Floors and Roof: Pre-cast planks, bearing walls: concrete block. 4 . EXTERIOR Walls generally block with some stucco. aluminum, A-2 rated thermal break with Entrances colored alwilinum. Roofing ballasted. Windows - colored insulating glass". Rubber membrane 5. INTERIOR Floors - generally carpeted, ceramic or quarry tile in wet and heavy traffic areas. Walls - generally concrete block. Ceilings - spray texture. Metal door frames with Legacy doors. 6. EQUIPMENT Elevator - pre-engineered.hydraulic S'x7', 50 fpm. Fireplace- steel prefabricated, energy saving with exterior combustion air intakes. 7. MECHANICAL \ Through wall Singer Heating & Air Conditioning units thermostatically controlled in each suite. '. TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE BSMT (GARAGE ALTERNATE) GRD. FLR. 2ND FLR. 3RD FLR. 7,632 27,266 27,266 27,266 TOTAL 89,430 +(19,634 + (19,634) r- i J I I I I I I I I I -,._.>,~., ,~~ "",;. ' . ~. ;4.;,' ,. -.':,t.- t I I , I I i I I I ,..,..... ~.uuu_ ~~ .., "t ;.".; WES1' ,El'EVAT10N . I I ; I SOU'IH ,EL~\f A TION -t'-".-,.__"o._, ~ '-!'-f .$'" " ;'..,.,j ." '. .~ '. -;..."< ~.=c""~~=~::~",,",..s',,,~~~==:" ES:'C,~~,=~,,'3'-="?"-C-- .t", EA~'~LEVATION . I ~ 1(" ~-~ .~. ~> .~- ....... NORTH ELEVATION ~.Cl 2P ~g ":0 SCALE l~ --~ . . U ~ ;2: m l '~ _~ I th.'''1 J ~ 5 i U :: f W ~ I t: I J: U Ql' <( !l. U. 1t<>: Og L..o.,.,,~. ~ r- 6t- .ft OU Vi .~ 0:: ~~ W.~;! r ~~. .,Jiiia: O~.~ :;:" ~z , . lZ::S ";t il uhi!,U;, lJ ilil i."K !~~i ~ ..... ~ .'" ~ ~ ~ " g 11:1 I' 5~ih I ~i'!! ~:iH I . ~;Hi t ',.., ,! J:::~;'-c--J;i' l ~ >i I 1~ii51 QJ ~ I m~ <_:';~'_'~ I ~..!j;l!!. ,~~~ .'''''''~'t . ...J,!M . >(J E UlZ 0!U . 00 Q.l "'~ "''''' '" ~ i ~ .~ .:i : ...,. w ~ en e f /Z f _cm<o,," ~O~ Northwestern College September 10,2007 Arden Hills Planning Commission Arden Hills City Hall 1245 West Highway 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112-5743 RE: PC # 06-037 Northwestern College Campus Master Planned Unit Development Dear Commissioners: Northwestern College welcomes the opportunity to continue our discussions with the City of Arden Hills about our plans for growth of our campus community, Since we were before the Planning Commission in March 2007, a number of positive events have occurred which have led us to make important revisions to our Master Plan. This letter is written to outline those changes and, also, to provide you details on the events that have occurred since March. As you know, our campus is located in both your City and the City of Roseville. We have been working with both cities over the last several months. Most of our efforts have centered on completing the voluntary Environmental Assessment Worksheet ("EAW") we agreed to provide in conjunction with Roseville. Roseville provided this service on behalf of both cities. This process involved identifying all possible environmental impacts from our project. The EA W was published on May 21 and, consistent with state rules, Roseville accepted public comments through June 20, The Roseville City Council subsequently discussed the EA W at t'vvc separate meetings in July. Follo\ving addition(iI.public_comment. at its JIIly 23 meeting~ the Roseville City Council determined that the environmental review was complete and made the required "negative declaration" determining there was no need for an Environmental Impact Study, We have also met with Arden Hills neighbors who Jive near the campus. As a result of those discussions and public comments on the EA W, we have made a number of changes to the Master Plan previously provided to you. We believe these changes fulfill, and even go beyond, the Planning Commission's conditions to approval of our application. In particular, we have made these changes: I. Ring Road. The central parking structure and the ring road have been redesigned so that vehicles exiting the new parking structure are not required to take a right turn and follow 3003 SNELLlNG AVENUE NORTH SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55113-1598 phone 651-631-5100 fax 651-631-5269 web www.nwc.edu the ring road to exit the campus. With the new design, traffic will be two-way in front of the parking structure, avoiding the need for these exiting vehicles to use the entire ring road to exit. This will avoid traffic and noise on the north end ofthe campus. 2. Parking Structure. We have prepared a preliminary design elevation which shows the architectural style and treatment of the parking facility. As you will see, this structure will be one level at grade and one below grade. We intend to design and build a structure that reflects the architectural style of our campus. These design elements will harmonize the parking structure with other campus buildings and respond to neighbors' concerns about maintaining the architectural style of the campus. 3. Buffering. We have prepared a detailed plan on landscaping, berming and buffering the ring riladfromihe neighborhotld ttltheeast, This plan was develepedwith input from the neighbors and has been reviewed by them. The plan utilizes a significant number of coniferous trees so that neighbors receive the benefit year-round. This detailed plan fulfills your corresponding condition. 4. Removal of Second Parking Structure. Our original submission identified a maintenance structure garage and parking ramp within the northwestern portion of the campus. We have removed this from our Master Plan. This will alleviate any concern over potential degradation of the bluff in that area and, also, improve views for our neighbors to the west. 5, Community Life Center. We have refined our plan to reduce the maximum size ofthis building from 80,000 square feet to 58,000 square feet. We will also limit this building to two levels above grade, not the three levels originally proposed. Again, we hope to minimize the visual impact to our neighbors. 6, Dormitorv. We have relocated the proposed dormitory from the eastern edge of the campus to west of the existing dormitories. While this dorm is located in Roseville, we believe this change also benefits those Arden Hills residents who are our neighbors to the east. There will be significantly less massing of structures along the campus' eastern edge. As reflected in these changes that have occurred through a series of dialogues, we have developed a positive, forward-looking plan which will meet our needs, those of the neighbors and the community as a whole. We look for-vard to presenting more detail on each of these changes, and the entire Master Plan, at your Octob meeting, ~ ,reIYY? ~ DL Schroeder Vice President for Business/ CFO cc: James Lehnhoff, City Planner ,,; /,0 \0 " O' o o o. . o o . .' . L t ik l .' .0 , 0 lit , ;:','). 0'1 G9 " CLOSE LAIIIISCAPEARCIII1ECTlRE+ IS$ue:E.istingArllorvilae a,eshadedbyotherlalger deciduous l....es causing them 10 become sparse on th"bo~om. Solution: Prune/remove exlslingdeclduouslreeslo allow more sunlight loreadl theexisllngArllorvltae. Shear existing Arborvitae to promoteden.ergrowlhhab. ;, Planlmature-Arborvitae alor.g fenGe where gaps exist. " Several large Arbor- "tae were removed creating ape In the e"is~ng soreen andlargerdeolduOIJstrees areshadlngoullheArborvl_ tae causing lhem 1O oooome sparse I In' Rellllnasmudl oftlle".istingbermen<l trees wheo constrtJcting new "roes" road. Plant matura a!bolVitae in existingga~. Prune orremove existing de- ciduous trees tl1al are shad. "ngoutexistingArbolV<tse. " Wilhout some kind of screening the new parkIng sragewilloovisiblefromlhe neighborhooo to lhe east. Limillheexlenl Igrading for naw parking arage by installing pilings C",ate an everg",en screen elong Ihe eastern wall ollhe arageorciosertolheneigll- borhoodaftercooslruction. Seieotivelyremoveexisting sCl1Jb trees and replace them ithrnatoreevergreentrees inslrategiclocations. Retain as much oIthe exisl_ ingbufferduringandafler arageconstruction Issue: Neighborhoodresi- denls to the east oflhe ex- istingdonn;toryleellhe ..-esenceoflhedonnitorybe- caussofinsufficisnlscreen- ing. Solulions: Removetrees Ihalnolongerfunotionasa soreenandslrategicallyre- p1aoothem. R..tainasrnucholtheexist- ing buffer as possible and supplement with more ever_ gr....ns. Ptantan..w..verg'....nscreen belween ll1..e><isting parking 101 and lhewood..d area Northwestern College Screening Project May 2007 Attachment 3D-2 Public Comments/Letters ~ ~HlLLS October 3, 2007, Planning Commission Meeting February 1, 2007 Planning Commission City of Arden Hills 1245 West Highway 96 Arden Hills, Mn 55112 Attn: James Lehnhoff, City Planner RE: Northwestern College Master Plan and PUD Dear Planning Commission Members: Our neighborhood adjoins the east side of Northwestern College. Last Wednesday, January 25th, those of us representing the neighborhood attended the second Northwestern College Open House to listen to a presentation of their new Master Plan and proposed Planned Unit Development (PUD). Representatives from the College and TDKA, their consultant, presented the plan and took questions after the presentation. As residents and neighbors we have concerns about this plan, Just a bit of background on us. Our neighborhood is bound by TH 51, a wetland, Lake Johanna, and Northwestern College; we are accessed by only two streets, People have chosen to live here for the quiet setting and streets, the lack of unnatural light (years ago we voted against installing street lights), the lake, and the sense of community that has developed from our shared caring for this place. It is a pastoral setting of houses on large lots with mature trees, sel apart from the hustle and bustle of a much busier city that surrounds us. We know what we have and are grateful for it For years we have been neighbors to Northwestern College, and have watched them grow and develop, The success and growth of the school is reflected in the increasing influx of students and instructors to the campus for daytime and evening classes, special events and concerts, weddings and athletic activities. We have adapted to the cars coming and going, the garbage and delivery trucks, the field public address system, orientation activities, bands, and all the other activity that Northwestern generates. We have tried to be good neighbors to one another. Now we are much concerned with the college's plans to increase its student population, and vehicle parking capacity, both by 50%, This plan calls for bringing a perimeter road closer to our neighborhood and building a multi-storied dormitory and student center, along with a parking ramp close to our resident's back yard on Asbury St. Broader issues are the projections to increase the Lydia and TH51 intersection to a double right and left turn lane, At the meeting several of us questioned some of the basic premises of Northwestern's growth plan as presented to us_ Many of our comments and concerns focused on preserving Northwestern's beautiful natural setting, in the context of their location in a residential area_ Among other ideas we suggested that the school could, through restrictions on student use of cars, and use of remote parking and shuttle services, be encouraging a culture and ethic away from cars, We brought up the use 01 satellite teaching operations to decrease pressure on the main campus, However, none of us saw in that meeting any sign of dialog or give and take, As we talked among ourselves after the meeting, most of us felt that Northwestern was "handling" our neighborhood in its determination to follow their comprehensively developed plan in its entirety, We heard nothing from Northwestern in regard to mitigating their expansion to the edges of our neighborhood. While there are varying concerns among those in our neighborhood, and different . ideas as to how Northwestern should amend its plan, as a committee and a neighborhood we have clear and specific concerns and requests, including buffering the presence of buildings, streets, and vehicles, and the light and sound there from. We are asking that your committee not approve Northwestern's amended PUD in its present form, We would like you to acl on behalf of our concerns in requiring components of Northwestern's plan that reflect the fact that they are located in so residential an area, and that their actions can have a significant effect on our quality of life and our property values, Please help us preserve what has defined our neighborhood for over 50 years_ S~ly ~ ~" Nancy J:cobson, ' son Arden Hills #3 Association Subcommittee 3188 Asbury 1kz71ny!j- 3135 Asbury , -'t3~OJ 9"" ~ Sarbar Younos11a~ 1574 lenhilt R a February 4. 2007 Planning Commission City of Arden Hills 1245 West Highway 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112 Altn: James Lehnhoff, City Planner Dear Planning Commission Members: I am the homeowner of 3093 North Asbury, My family and I have resided bere for 55years.I am writing to comment on your REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION/SUMMARY OF STAFF RECOMMENDATION concerning Amended Planned Unit Development Agreement for Northwestern College. .. Upon preliminary review. Planning Division staff believes thai the proposed Planned Unit Development amendment is consistent with the purpose and intent of the original PUD and with appropriate review and approval of stann waler and traffic managemenl plans, the gradual expansion of the College facilities will not have commensurate adverse impacts on the surrounding community. .. I am particularly upset with the last statement for it is not true for me, my family or neighbors. It will most certainly have an adverse impact on OUf surroundings. With your approval of Northwestern College's PUD you will be supporting the desecration of a neighborhood that has been established for over 50 years! Plainly put, please do not approve Northwestern's proposed increase of their student population. Why? Northwestern College states that there is a need for their ~'product" and they are turning students away. Northwestern College has most certainly moved away trom their small four year Christian College roots towards becoming a 'University'. They are running a business 24/7; from daycare to adult night classes and allowing their campus to be utilized for non school related events. I question why the northern communities of Roseville and Arden Hills feel the need to support two Christian colleges within close proximity of each other? All colleges turn away a portion of their prospective students. Perhaps Northwestern College should look at raising the bar on accepting the ~best of the best' , instead of looking at the "product" they produce as revenue to be used towards their own expansion. We are at a time when one shoutd be reviewing what is happening to our planet and preserving our green spaces. Please see below a quote from an article that appeared recently in the Star Tribune, Faith+Values section. It is from one of Northwestem College professors. UGod has given me a gift of personal salvation that I did not earn~ " he said. 4lOut of gratefulness, we Christians should take a significant role in caring for God's creation. ff Jeny Bielby, Professor at Northwestern College "God is ~reat. God is ~reen" Star Tribune, Saturday, February 3, 2007 If the college truly feels this way, they should not build on existing green space~ Go to a location that is seeking further development, i.e. Twin Lakes or the Arden Hills Arsenal. Like a family who has out grown their home, they should move Oll. If they wish to expand, have them set up an alternative campus separate from the main campus. Follow in the path of other metropolitan schools and establish dual urban campus locations. Why should there be an influx of all their students to our area. Have the college establish sites to teach the students where they work or live. Advances in teaching are now utilizing on-line courses; students take classes directly from their own computers. Many are no longer driving to an institution to be taught. There will be more electronic advances with teaching in the future_ Thus there would be a decline in commuter students and less of a demand for housing and parking. If Northwestern College would recognize these changes within education and stop functioning as a business, then perhaps they could support the above statement from their professor. Northwestern College has made the statements that they will do berms and screens with trees to cover their new proposed development. Before this PUD is approved, I would like to see a comprehensive landscape design with costs, and a 3D model on what they plan to do_ I would request that all berms and screening be completed before any construction is started, regardless of when the buildings are to be completed either in 2007 or 2018. All landscaping should be completed now to ensure adequate growth for when the buildings are completed. It would be a good faith gesture and would protect us from the sounds of construction and of course the ultimate goal of not seeing any of the new development. I would also recommend that each homeowner work with the college's landscape architect on what type of screening would work for each homeowner. In addition Northwestern College should also secure funds to be given to each homeowner so they can create their -own barrier on their own property with Northwestern College footing the bilL For example: when Macalester College started to encroach into their neighbor's backyard on Macalester Street, with changes that would affect the neighborhood, they built all new garages for the homeowners. We have heard and seen only what is going to benefit Northwestern College_ It lS now time for them to come forward and demonstrate their conunitment to being a good neighbor. I would ask you to please remember and consider the neighbors that have built and supported this community for over 50 years with their dollars before your conunittee approves Northwestern College PUD. Thank you, Marie P _ Churchward 3093 N. Asbury St. Paul, MN 55112 651-633-1882 Thomas L. Fabel 1550 Edgewater Avenue Arden Hill, MN 55112 February 21,2007 James Lenhoff Arden Hills City Planner 1245 West Highway 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112 Re: Northwestern College Expansion Plans Dear Mr. Lenhoff: This letter concerns the application for expansion plan approval from Northwestern College, which currently is under consideration by the City of Arden Hills, For the past 23 years, I and my family have resided at 1550 Edgewater A venue in Arden Hills, which is about 100 yards from the eastern boundary of Northwestern College, During these years, we have spent substantial time as welcome visitors on the Northwestern campus and have had many neighborly encounters with the college, Both as a practicing attorney and as the former Deputy Mayor for the City of St. Paul, I have extensive experience with the type of planning and land-use decisions which the City of Arden Hills will be making in the near future regarding Northwestern's plans for expansion and campus usage, I know that during this process the City will be receiving many comments and suggestions from neighbors of the college, mostly expressing concerns about the potential negative impact which the college's plans may have on neighboring properties, While not wishing to take issue with those concerns, I believe that the City also should receive a neighbor's opinion that the college has a long-history of sensitivity to neighborhood concerns, and that its current plans appear to be consistent with that history, The college has been proactive in seeking input from the neighbors concerning its plans, and it appears to be accommodating neighborhood concerns with both the physical plans and the campus usage plans which it intends to implement over the next several years, As one family of nearby neighbors, we look forward to working with the college as it moves through the planning and pennitting process which is required for a development of this nature, We also look forward to many more years of an excellent relationship with the college, which has been greatly enhanced by Northwestern's sensitivity to neighboring properties, and by its generosity in welcoming neighbors to the campus and to campus activities, 2234338\1 James Lenhoff February 21, 2007 Page 2 If you wish to discuss these matter, please feel free to contact me at 651-636-2423, or 612-371-3200, Thomas L. Fabel TLF/dkj Amy H. Wallin' 3254 Sandeen Road Arden Hills, MN 55112 March 1, 2007 Mr. James Lenhoff City Planner City of Arden Hills 1245 west Highway 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112 Dear Mr. Lenhoff, As a resident of Arden Hills, I strongly urge you to approve the PUD application of Northwestern College, Northwestern has put a great deal of thought and effort into their plan. I appreciate having the college in our community and believe the college is good for the city of Arden Hills. Please convey my support for this PUD application to the members of the city planning commission and the city council. appreciate their attention to this matter II Sincerely, 0/1) ltj #t(,~L- Amy H. Wallin II II II II. ~ .Jll!! II March 5, 2007 Mr. James Lenhoff Arden Hills City Planner 1245 West Highway 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112 RE: The Planning Commission Meeting on March 7, 2007 Dear Mr. Lenhoff, .'/'Y'." visitroseville,c'~:" On behalf of the Roseville Visitors Association (RV A) I am writing in support of Northwestern College's expansion plans, The RVA exists to generate measurable economic benefit and development to Roseville's hospitality, tourism, business and government communities, An intended benefit of this activity is to instill a sense of pride and ownership within the community at large, We are successful in our endeavors due in no small part to Northwestern College who generated over 1,000 group room nights for an estimated economic impact of $78,750 in 2006. These rooms' nights resulted from events such as the NCAA Girls Volleyball Championships, women's retreat weekends and meetings. This figure does not take into account any transient hotel room nights booked in both Arden Hills and Roseville generated from potential student and parent visits, parent weekends, college concerts, events, activities, KTIS radio, and departmental meetings. Northwestern College benefits not only the hotels in our hospitality community but restaurnats, attractions and shopping venues as well. Their community partnership is strong as evidenced by their participation in our Roseville Glows Holiday Lighting program, food drive and board participation, The Roseville Visitors Association stands strongly behind Northwestern College and we encourage you to support their expansion requests, Thank you fo~r consideration, /irV7 CCiU:fA)Jt \?:sN \ J\JI e Larson \ -..-Ex, utive Director 651-633-3002 Voice 877-980-3002 Toll Feee 651-636-0475 Fox 2100 North Snelling Avenue Suite 59 Roseville, MN 55113 March 5, 2007 RE: May 7, 2007 Planning Commission meeting Mr. James Lenhoff City Planner City of Arden Hills 1245 West Highway 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112 Dear Mr. Lenhoff, We are residents of Arden Hills writing in support of Northwestern College's PUD, 'IVe have looked at the PUD and feel it is well thought out in its planning and its presentation. Northwestern has demonstrated that it is planning for growth appropriately by working with their neighbors to make this a positive experience for all involved, The college has conducted traffic studies, environmental impact studies, and is committed to finding reasonable sound buffering options with the neighboring homeowners, They have demonstrated that they are prepared for this undertaking, As graduates of Northwestern College, we can attest to the value of the education, programs, and outreach efforts of the institution, It was during our time at NWC that we developed a love for St. Paul and the surrounding communities, leading us to settle and work in the area. Our home may not adjacent to the college, but we feel confident that the growth of Northwestern is good for the community, Their students are active in the community and are an asset to our local businesses and organizations, They volunteer their time in our neighborhoods and churches. They intern at our banks and non-profits, They work at our restaurants and stores, Most importantly, their students are part of this community, as much a part of it as we are, Even though they may not reside in Arden Hills, Northwestern students are a face of Arden Hills to neighboring communities, and their lives and stories are part of our city, We believe in the work Northwestern College and its students are doing, From fall musicals and summer camps to football games and Christmas at Northwestern, they have always invited the Arden Hills community to be part of the institution, We want to see this relationship continue and grow as Northwestern plans for the future, We strongly support their PUD and encourage you to give it your support, as well. Thank you for your time! Sincerely, Sclt2P~ Scott and Amanda Ginn 1717 Parkshore Drive Apartment 1105 Arden Hills, MN 55112 March 5, 2007 Mr. James Lenhoff Arden Hills City Planner 1245 West Highway 96 Arden Hills, MN 55112 Dear Mr. Lenhoff, I'm a resident who lives at 3586 Ridgewood Road in Arden Hills and I wish to speak on behalf of Northwestern College and the changes that it is considering, I feel the request by the college to grow to 2,400 students is a reasonable request. I am aware that students from the college have a significant impact on our community, Students are involved in a number of service projects and have a wholesome influence upon other young people in the community, Northwestern College is also a significant employer in the community and provides a strong economic benefit for the Arden Hills ,community, I am also aware that the college has been very friendly to the neighborhood residence, inviting them to events on campus through a strong fine arts and athletic program, I am also supportive of the Christian education that the college offers and see that program as a benefit to young people throughout the metropolitan area and beyond, Therefore, I would like to speak on behalf of the request for growth that Northwestern College has submitted. Sincerely, ~~~ rohn Engstrom Local Resident Mark and Ruth McGuire 2030 Glenpaul Ave, Arden Hills, MN 55112 5 March 2007 Dear Arden Hills Planning Commission, We are writing this letter on behalf of Northwestern College (NWC) and its PUD which will be considered at your meeting on March 7,2007. We believe that NWC has gone through the PUD process well, is considerate of zouing and its neighbors, and is an organization whose growth will benefit the city of Arden Hills, As we think about the process that NWC has gone through, we are reminded of a situation that we experienced with growth in Arden Hills, Our house is adjacent to the St. Paul Radiology building on the comer of County Road D and Cleveland Ave. As neighbors of this property, we were concerned about its development. The first developer was manipulative and unethical in his process and plans, and we opposed his PUD. The second developer was St. Paul Radiology (SPR), As neighbors, we had no trouble with its PUD moving forward for a couple, main reasons. SPR talked openly with us as neighbors concerning its plans and the structure that was going to be built. It was willing to work with us on screening that was acceptable to us. Knowing that SPR was going through the process in a fair, honest, and considerate way caused us to be agreeable to its building on that property, We feel that Northwestern College has made the same, and even greater, effort to provide information and thoughtfulness to its neighbors. NWC is not asking for anything that is against the zoning of the property it owns. It has conducted several studies in order to present accurate data and findings to the city staff and to the neighbors regarding genuine concerns of theirs. It has hosted commnnity information nights and talked with adjacent neighbors to find out what they would like to see in regard to screening between the two properties, We believe that in all these ways NWC has gone out of its way to plan for growth with all due consideration to its neighbors and the process established by the city of Arden Hills. We also believe that growth at NWC is beneficial to our city, Among other things, the College provides entertainment and cultural activities to our area, It provides employees and students who desire to serve and give back to the community. It provides a scenic and safe walking area that many neighbors take advantage of NWC's growth also makes good academic and fiscal sense for the organization, And in this regard, the College is making efforts to grow other than on the peninsula that this POD covers by purchasing properties that move employees, college traffic, and parking off the main campus to outlying office buildings, In conclusion, we support Northwestern College's PUD because it has followed due process, has considered its neighbors well, and makes sense for the growth of the organization to the benefit of the city of Arden Hills. Our hope is that the Planning Commission will vote in favor of this PUD sending it forward to the City CounciL Regards, /~/""/ /i.L -f~*'. f~/~ Mark and Ruth McGuire '7'biiLp !7. :7abef, 7), 7), <5, On 'JOJin Balie ooui/i 4600 Bde 7?oaJ !J?or;r;insdak, !Jl(.inneso/a .5.5422 Office ?1ione.. (763) S:J7-I292 March 6, 2007 Mr. James Lenhoff City Planner City of Arden Hills 1245 West Highway 96 Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112 Dear Mr. Lenhoff, I have been asked and I am happy to write on behalf of Northwestern College. By way of introduction I am a 35 year resident of Arden Hills. My residence is 3426 Glen Arden Court. In all of those years we have enjoyed a cordial neighbor relationship first with Nazareth Hall and since 1972 with Northwestern College, In 20011 approached the Arden Hills Park and Recreation Committee to express my concern for the Buckthorn infestation in Arden Hills, Subsequent to that meeting I worked with Public Works Director Tom Moore on a public awareness and removal campaign. One of my first contacts was Northwestern College. At that time Dr. Jerry Beilby of the Biology Department at Northwestern took up the challenge and actively eliminated over 85% ofthe Buckthorn growth on campus, He accomplished this by incorporating science and student work efforts, That to me demonstrated a wonderful commitment to the community as well as to the environment. I respect the mission of Northwestern College, I value the presence of Northwestern College in my community I heartily endorse their expansion and I trust that in cooperation with the City of Arden Hills the project will satisfy all concerned parties, Sincerely, //~---';-tG-'" ..~... .... . . . - . - \ . . . . ... ~_-...' :'\ .... . /.:'_.........." " _.f ... ~),,_ .' . . ~~ --. '.,J 7 '.,.. . -:- FROM McGehee FAX NO. 651 645 2990 Mar. 07 2007 05:38PM Pi 'Ii 77 Mid Oaks Lane Roseville, MN 55113 March 7, 2007 PIanningCommission Arden HiIk, MN Dear Commissioners: I wish to address two concerns regarding the expansion proposal for Northwestem College. I aIlI unable to attend the meeting this evening, but I felt that it was important to have these concerns voiced-even if I aIlI a Roseville resident. I. I would like to strongly urge Arden lliUs to request a discretionary EA W lEIS for the proposed eKpansion. I make this request based on the fact that Little Lake Johanna and Lake Johanna are both classified as impaired waters. As you know, Lake Johanna has a public swimming beach and a boat landing. I am very concerned about improving the quality of the water in both of these lakes. At the present time the Rice Creek Watersbed District focuses on "water qU8lJtity" in runoff and not "water quality." The WHlershed represelll3tive present at a Roseville Environment and Public Warks COIllIIlission meeting on Febnuuy 27 stated that the District was "reactive" at this point that perhaps 10 years or SO hence the watershed district may be more proactive with regard to water quality. The point here is that one cannot and should not rely on the Rice Creek Watershed District to he able to enforce water quality standards at this time. 2. I would like to request that Anten Hills again place a meaningful and enforceable enrollment <lap on the College. Although the traffic implications are much more significant in Roseville, the continued growth of the campus will put significant pressure on the surrounding residential neighborhoods where properties will be bought and rented either fully or partially to students. This may impact properly values and may result in the college acquiring property to provide an additional exit from the campus tbrough the Asbury neighborhood. Speaking with some former Roseville Planning Commission members, Roseville has apparently counted on the eurolIment <lap provided by Arden Hills when making decisiOJlS. In 2005 "traditional day students" numbered 1767 and the total number of students in the Focns Program was 523. These Focus stodents are distributed at various locations aroWld the Twin Cities, but some attend olasses in Roseville. It is olear, however, that the FTE enrollment is currently beyond the 1600 cap agreed to by the College. A permanent cap of2oo0 FfEs might be a good compromise. Sincerely, ? --../.,<<- "711 (/ / /.LA.-/~ Tam McGehee (651) 645-2993 Drs.Rafi & Barbara Y ounoszai 1574 Glenhill Road Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112 April 20, 2007 Brenda Holden, Councilmember Arden Hills City Hall 1245 West Highway 96 Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112-5734 Dear Brenda Holden, PropertY value is one of the most important aspects of home ownership. When propertY values are adversely affected by new construction and new roads, both the community and the city itself is adversely affected and suffers. Our propertY value has already been adversely affected by the expansion plan developed by Northwestern College. We are particularly affected by the proposed road that the college wishes to construct close to the fence separating seven or eight neighborhood homes, ours included, from the Northwestern campus. In our particular case the value of our home is reduced by at least $25,000. And even if we sell before any such road is built, we have to disclose to any buyer the fact that the college plans such major construction, especially the adjacent road. Please read carefully the enclosed Realtor's assessment which clearly states the reduction in propertY value that we face due to the planned expansion and the proposed road. It will probably be more than $25,000, since fiunilies with children would certainly not want to live so close to a road nor would asthmatics, etc. We would not buy our own home, in spite of all our recent improvements, were we in the market today! Please give this your very serious consideration as the Northwestern College plan comes to you for approval. There are many other ways that the college can configure the road and by so doing help us and our neighbors preserve our major investment and protect our property value. Cordially, ~a.t '/-'-13~~~__~~ Rafi and Barbara Y ounoszai -- 1l4Lm9m.:Baibara-:-E[You~oszar-M.?~t t\r1~~ls-fon6~ up for 1574:~lenhill Road -- ~._- .-=~ _ ..._.~: :~?g_e 1) '. ? From: To: Date: Subject: "Hames, Angela" <AngelaHames@edinarealty.com> <byounoszai@gw.hamline.edu> 4/2/200711:01 AM Market Analysis follow up for 1574 Glenhill Road Dear Mrs. Younoszai, It was truly a pleasure to meet you on Saturday morning. I enjoyed the tour of your home and discussing your future plans. I wanted to take a moment to review the highlights of our meeting. Timing: When you and your husband are ready to list your home it would be nice to have about one month to get all the last minute details in order. If that is going to be the spring on 2008, these details would indude an updated market analysis of the price, staging, and marketing pieces such as photography. Repairs and Updates: I am glad we had a chance to discuss a few of the items that are most important to buyers when making purchasing decisions. Below please find a list of the key items to address prior to listing your home. In addition to this list, you would want to remove any and all wallpaper, paint all the walls with a fresh coat of a neutral color paint, and make sure that everything is in good repair according to the booklet I left with you outlining how to prepare your home for sale. Hardwood Floors: Your home has some of most gorgeous hardwood I have seen in a long time. Buyers LOVE this and it is in your best interest to show off as much of it as possible. Prepare to roll up and store your beautiful imported rug collection and consider the possibility of exposing the hardwood under the living room carpet Windows: As with nearly every home built in the 1950's, your home needs to have some windows replaced. The bedroom windows and bath window are the most important, but also get a bid on the bow window in the living room. All the windows and door sills should be sanded down and re-stained and sealed so that there is no "soft" wood or any evidence of moisture damage including black or grey wood. Front Yard Approach: This spring and summer have the overgrown trees and shrubbery in the front of the home removed altogether Make sure nothing obstructs the view of the home from the curb. Freshen up the planting area in front with some mulch and possibly a few smaller shrubs. It will look very bare to you, but buyers will be able to see your home and it will appear much larger when all the windows and doors are visible from the street. Pricing: This is tough, because as you know, Northwestern College has applied to construct a road along your back fence. This will have significant impact on the price of your home. I can tell you that if I were to list your home today WITHOUT the road back there or the possibility of one I would suggest a list price of $275,000. If you do all the updates and repairs listed above, along with some of the other repairs and staging we discussed I would say you would be closer to the $300,000 mark. · (4/2/~QQ7I~~~batill3. YO!!.l1.os~~Market Afl.a1Ysl~-fOiiow ue..~] 574 Gieii.fi1]L~~ / / HOWEVER, a road in your back yard will seriously affect the price a buyer would be willing to pay. The amount is difficult to calculate, but we do know that homes in your neighborhood that back up to Snelling Avenue would sell for about $50,000 to $60,000 more if they were on the other side of the street The proposed road would not have such a dramatic impact on your home's value as Snelling Avenue, however, it would drop the price by at least $25,000. The other important thing to know is that as long there is still a possibility of a road being built, you must disclose this to any potential buyers. So, unless the issue is voted down by the city and put to rest completely, this will have some impact on the price and marketability of your home. Until this issue is decided upon I cannot give you a definite market price. As you know, my husband grew up in your neighborhood and my in-laws still live on Ridgewood Road. We live in Arden Hills near Moundsview HS with our t.l1ree teenagers and we have been there for 15 years. We have our three kids in local schools and we are very connected in the community. I sell quite a few homes in Arden Hills each year. In 2006 there were 48 single family homes that sold in our city and I am proud to say that I sold 8 of them, 16% of the total. I have been selling real estate in the area for nearly seven years, selling an average of $7 million dollars each year. When the time comes to list your home, we will make sure the marketing and the price are just right Until then, please call me as a resource for the various projects you will have as you get readyl I will send you the contact information of some reliable contractors under separate cover Please give my best to your husband, and have a joyous springl Angela Hames Real Estate for Real Life Edina Realty Roseville 651.639-6314 direct 651.307.9731 mobile http://www.angelahames.edinarealty.com .-.---:-. -.- == _P~g~21 James Lehnhoff From: Sent: To: Subject: Kathryn L Reyerson, Lead co-editor Medieval Encounters [reyer001@umn.edu] Monday, June 04, 2007 3:36 PM James Lehnhoff Northwestern College reyerOO 1 . vcf Attachments: [gJ reyerOO1.vcf (177 B) Kathryn L. Reyerson 3201 Ridgewood Road Arden Hills, MN 55112 651-62B-9463 June 4, 2007 Dear City Planner James Lehnhoff: I am a resident of Arden Hills and a member of the Arden Hills #3 Association, a neighborhood association encompassing about sixty houses in Arden Hills and Roseville on the streets of Glen Hill, Asbury, Ridgewood, and Edgewater. We are unusual, and at times handicapped, in that our neighborhood spans two municipalities, Roseville and Arden Hills. Our neighborhood shares a bay on the southeastern shore of Lake Johanna with Northwestern College, and neighbors on Asbury have yards that back up to Northwestern College property. I am writing to you regarding issues of concern with the proposed expansion/building program of Northwestern College. Over the years (we have lived in our house since 1991), my experience with Northwestern College has been difficult. They used to host loud summer rock concerts that caused annoying sound pollution, their canoes were abandoned on our beach, and not long after 9/11, they bombarded our bay with fireworks that caused considerable consternation. More recently, there have been fewer incidents. Now the problems relate to intense traffic at the corner of Snelling and Lydia, traffic on Lydia, and rapid ~drivethroughs" on our residential streets that are a danger to neighborhood children. The college's current plans to expand its enrollment dramatically and to engage in considerable construction are cause for enormous concern. The Northwestern site is not like the isolated and bucolic site of Bethel University. Northwestern is surrounded on several sides by long-standing residential neighborhoods of lovely homes. The site is too small for massive expansion. Already, recent storms and the building of utility access have caused the landscape barrier that formerly shielded the backyards of houses on Asbury to be seriously compromised. If there is to be any expansion on the college campus, it needs careful monitoring by the two cities of Roseville and Arden Hills. The existing berms protecting the Asbury houses need to be maintained with all development occurring on the college side of the berms. A visual barrier of evergreens, shrubs, deciduous trees, fencing, and berms needs to screen the neighborhood to the height of the upper stories of houses. Light fixtures for buildings and roads need to be directed away from the neighborhood houses. No heavy equipment or buses should be allowed to idle on the Asbury side of campus. Garbage pickup and deliveries should occur only in daylight hours. Student access to the lake should not make use of the utility easement but rather be directed to a path farther from the neighborhood. And, of great importance, any new buildings should be positioned as far away from the neighborhood as possible. When institutions expand, there is always a risk that individuals and 1 neighborhoods will suffer. We depend on local government to protect us from negative consequences of institutional expansion. It is for this reason that I bring the above concerns to your attention. Thank you for your assistance in protecting our neighborhood. Sincerely, Kathryn Reyerson 2 Attachment 3D-3 March 7, 2007, Planning Case 06-037 Memo (w/o attachments) and meeting minutes ~ ~HILLS October 3, 2007, Planning Commission Meeting ~ ~HILLS MEMORANDUM DATE: March 7, 2007 PC Agenda Item 3.D TO: Planning Commission FROM: James Lehnhoff, City Planner SUBJECT: PC # 06-037 - Continued Northwestern College (TKDA is the planning consultant for the College) Campus Master Planned Unit Development 3003 Snelling Avenue North ATTACHMENTS: 3D-l Letters Submitted by the Applicant 3D-2 Questions/Concerns from the February Planning Commission meeting 3D-3 February PC 06-037 Memo 3D-4 Traffic/Stormwater Evaluation Memo from Roseville 3D-5 Building Official, City Engineer, and Fire Marshal Review 3D-6 Letter from a Resident 3D-7 Topographic Map Requested Action Northwestern College is requesting approval of a proposed updated Master Plan for their campus. Meetinl! and Review Process The February 7, 2007, Planning Commission included an informational public hearing for the Northwestern College Campus Master Planned Unit Development application. At the February meeting, Northwestern College presented the Master Plan, and the public and Commission were given an opportunity to ask questions and state concerns regarding the proposal. A list ofthe comments and questions from that meeting is in Attachment 3D-2. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor March 7, 2007 \\Metro~inet.us\ardenhi11s\Planning\PJanning Cases\2006\06-037 Northwestern College Master Plan (PENDING)\030707 ~ PC Report- Northwestern College Master Plan.doc Page 1 of9 The March 7, 2007, Planning Commission meeting is scheduled to give time to Northwestern College to respond to the questions and concerns from the February meeting and, if appropriate, the Planning Commission can make a recommendation to the City Council. The March Planning Commission is a continuation of the public hearing from the February meeting. The City ofRoseville is following a similar public meeting process. While the City ofRoseville does have a separate review and slightly different regulatory process, the two cities are working closely together on reviewing and preparing conditions for the Master Plan. Staff recognizes that although the College crosses municipal boundaries, the College has an impact on both communities. 1. Overview of Request Backl!round The full information from the February evaluation will generally not be repeated in this memo. However, the February 7, 2007, Planning Commission memo is attached for referencing as needed (Attachment 3D-3). A copy of the PUD Application Report from TKDA and Northwestern College is not included with this memo. Please refer to the February Planning Commission packet or go online to obtain a copy from the City's website at htto://www.ci.arden-hills.mn.us. The applicant submitted a letter on February 23,2007, responding to a number of the questions and concerns from the February Planning Commission meeting (Attachment 3D- 1). Staff has included some comments and analysis regarding the letter below; however, TKDA and Northwestern College will be presenting the information at the Planning Commission meeting. In the attached letter, TKDA has indicated that some pieces of information will be brought to the Planning Commission meeting. 2. The Campus Master Planned Unit Development Process The proposed Master Plan is a form of a Campus Master Planned Unit Development (PUD). Smaller PUDs typically have at least two public meetings--one for the Master Plan and one for the Final Plan (Section 1320.14 ofthe Zoning Code). Generally, the Master Plan lays out the design and concept for a development, and the Final Plan incorporates any changes required by the City to mitigate the impacts of the development. The Final Plans are usually detailed and include a specific construction timetable. In the case of Northwestern College, and other large PUDs in the City, there will not be a Final Plan stage. Instead, the Master Plan outlines the overall development plan for the Campus, an estimated development timeline, the impacts ofthe plan, and potential mitigation measures. A Campus Master Plan is less detailed in terms of architecture, landscaping, and City of Arden Hiils Planning Commission Meetingfor March 7, 2007 \\Metro-inet.us\ardenhills\Planning\Planning Cases\2006\06-037 Northwestern College Master Plan (pENDING)\030707 - PC Report- Northwestern College Master Plan.doc Page 2 of9 stormwater management because the Plan covers a longer timeframe and changes may need to be made before a particular part of the Plan is implemented. However, as each part of the Master Plan is implemented, the College will be required to return to the City for a Site Plan Review and comply with any new regulations and Statutes that are adopted after the Master Plan approval. During the Site Plan Review for a particular building or change to the campus, the College would submit a detailed construction, landscaping, stormwater management, and other plans required by the City. The Site Plan Review process requires review from the Planning Commission and approval from the City Council before any permits are issued. Having a Master Plan in place allows the College to plan for the future with some certainty and it makes it easier for the City and neighborhood to know what changes may be made at the College over the next 12 to 20 years. The College can also prepare mitigation measures in advance based on City and neighborhood concerns. 3. Site Data North Lake Johanna South (Roseville) Institutional Planned Unit Develo ment Zone R-I: Single Family Residential Institutional East Low Density Residential Single Family Residential West Low Density Residential R-I: Single Family Residential Single Family Residential PI!: Public & Institutional Institutional: Higher Education R-I: Single Family Residential 42.69 Acres in Arden Hills, 64.31 Acres in Roseville, and 107 Acres total To be detennined based on how many students equals one FTE Variable. Steep slope toward Lake Johanna and Little Lake Johanna. Generally flat in the central ortions of the earn us. Additional Plan Review and Findin2s 1. Lot Setbacks - Meets Requirements While the Master Plan does technically meet the minimum side setbacks required in the R-I Zone, it can be argued that the College has a different and/or greater impact than a typical residential lot. It may be prudent to discuss setting a greater minimum side setback to City 01 Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetinglor March 7, 2007 \\Metro-inet.us\ardenhills\Planning\Planning Cases\2006\06-037 Northwestern College Master Plan (PENDING)\030707 - PC Report- Northwestern College Master Plan.doc Page 3 019 decrease the impact of the College on adjacent properties, particularly along the eastern property line. 2. Revised Impervious CoveragelLandscaped Area - Meets Requirements with Conditions Impervious and Structure Coverace bv City and Total Existing Proposed Maximum square snuare feet square feet feet Structure Coverage 132,316 8% 179,550 11% 399,554 25% Impervious Coverage 515,155 32% 583,166 36% 650,852 35% Arden Landscaoed Area 1,083,061 68% 1,276,410 80% No Maximum Hills Water Area'" 261,360 14% 261,360 261,360 Land Area 1,598,216 86% 1,598,216 1,598,216 Total Propertv Size 1,859,576 1,859,576 1,859,576 Structure Coverage 99,555 7% 135,733 9% -. - Imoervious Coveraae 436,235 29% 533,933 35% -. - Landscaoed Area 1,088,801 71% 991,103 65% No Maximum Roseville Water Area'" 448,668 23% 448,668 448,668 Land Area 1,525,036 77% 1,525,036 1,525,036 Total Property Size 1,973,704 1,973,704 1,973,704 Structure Coveraae 231,871 7% 315,283 10% -. Imoervious Coverage 951,390 30% 1,117,159 36% -. - Landscaped Area 2,171,862 70% 2,006,093 64% No Maximum Total Water Area** 710,028 19% 710,028 710,028 Land Area 3,123,252 81% 3,123,252 3,123,252 Total Prooertv Size*** 3,833,280 3,833,280 3,833,280 'Estimated by City Staff "Reported byTKDA, 15.9 Acres ***Onlv includes the orooertv north of Lvdia Ave, -88 acres The PUD area includes the 88 acres north of Lydia Avenue. The other properties south of Lydia in Roseville are subject to separate regulations set by the City of Roseville and are not part of this overall PUD review process. The land area in Arden Hills is approximately 37 acres and the water area is approximately 6 acres. The above structure and impervious coverage chart has been revised to include the total land area, the total water area, and the coverage of the land area for each City. Please note that the City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor March 7, 2007 \\Metro-inet.us\ardenhills\Planning\Planning Cases\2006\06-037 Northwestern College Master Plan (pENDING)\030707 - PC Report- Northwestern College Master Plan.doc Page 4 of9 impervious coverage includes the structure coverage. TKDA did indicate that the proposed building coverage is estimated since the actual footprint size of a structure may change when the College moves forward with a particular construction project. As noted above, all construction projects in Arden Hills are subject to the Site Plan Review process, which requires Planning Commission and City Council review. The additional buildings would not cause the campus to exceed the twenty-five (25) percent structure coverage limit in Arden Hills; however, the campus would slightly exceed the thirty-five (35) percent overall impervious coverage limit by one percentage point on the Arden Hills side of the campus. When viewing the entire campus, the total impervious coverage would be only thirty (30) percent. Since the Roseville portion of the Campus is within a PUD type of zoning classification, the impervious and structure coverage limit may vary in Roseville depending on the type of development. The City can permit the campus to exceed the thirty-five (35) percent impervious coverage limit as part of the PUD approval process. However, a condition limiting the campus to thirty-five (35) percent coverage could be included and, if necessary, the College could approach the City in the future with a PUD amendment to increase the coverage limit if deemed necessary. It is possible that the thirty-five (35) percent limit will not be exceeded since the exact imperviouslbuilding coverage will not be fully determined until a particularly structure is designed. 3. Landscaping - Determined during Site Plan Review process TKDA will be bringing cross sections of how landscaping could be placed between the ring road and adjacent residential properties. The cross section would only be an example of what could be done and would not be adopted as part of the Master Plan. More detailed landscaping plans would be reviewed during the Site Plan Review process. 4. Structure Height - Determined during Site Plan Review process There were a number of questions regarding the design of the proposed parking structure that would be located on the border between Arden Hills in Roseville in the center of the campus (building 23). Although the proposed parking garage would be two levels, the bottom level would be below grade. The top level would be at grade and would, therefore, be much easier to screen from adjacent properties. 5. Parking, Traffic, Access, and Circulation - Under Review Traffic While some vehicles certainly travel on roads that go through Arden Hills on their way to City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for March 7, 2007 \\Metro-inet.us\ardenhills\Planning\Planning Cases\2006\06-Q37 Northwestern College Master Plan (PENDING)\030707 - PC Report _ Northwestern College Master Plan.doc Page 5 of9 Northwestern College, the access points to the College are entirely within the City of Roseville. The applicants have submitted a Traffic and Parking Impact Study, and Roseville's evaluation of the plan and recommended conditions are in Attachment 3D-4. The conditions related traffic are not included in Staff s recommendation because Arden Hills does not have jurisdiction over the road improvements in Roseville. Nevertheless, Arden Hills recognizes the importance of the conditions, which is why a copy of the traffic evaluation report from Roseville is included in this memo. Circulation In regards to the proposed parking structure in the central portion of the campus (building 23), TKDA has indicated that they are reviewing the possibility of designing the parking structure so that exiting vehicles do not have to traverse the entire ring road to exit the campus. Staff has included a condition that would require the College to design the parking structure so that traffic will not have to traverse the entire ring road to exit the campus. Connections Some residents have indicated a concern that the College will want to construct a connection to Asbury Avenue at some point in the future. The College has stated that they have no intentions or plans to construct any vehicle connections to Asbury Avenue or Shorewood Drive. Staff has included a condition prohibiting any future connections to either street in Arden Hills. 6. Student/Campus Population The letter from TKDA in Attachment 3D-l includes information regarding student populations, FTEs (full time equivalent students), and attendance for various events. 7. Future Regulations The Master Plan does not exempt the college from complying with future regulations that would impact construction on the Campus. While the College has not requested an exemption from any future regulatory requirements, Staff has included a condition ensuring compliance with any future regulations unless a variance is granted. 8. Additional Review The Fire Marshal, Building Official, and City Engineer have reviewed the plans and their memos are in Attachment 3D-5. The City Attorney has reviewed the plan and does not have any comments that affect the City a/Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting/or March 7, 2007 \\Metro-inet.us\ardenhills\Planning\Planning Cases\2006\06-037 Northwestern College Master Plan (PENDING)\030707 - PC Report- Northwestern College Master Plan.doc Page 60/9 overall design ofthe campus. 9. Submitted Letters Since the February Planning Commission meeting, one additional letter regarding Northwestern College was submitted to the City (Attachment 3D-6). Notice & Resident Comment Notice was published for the February 7,2007, Planning Commission in the Arden Hills/Shoreview Bulletin. That notice was also mailed to property owners within one thousand (1000) feet of Northwestern College in Arden Hills; however, State Statutes only require a 350 feet radius for notification. The City ofRoseville sent notices to those residents within Roseville. New notifications were not sent for the March 7, 2007, Planning Commission meeting. Staff Analvsis If the Planning Commission recommends approval of Planning Case 06-037, Staff recommends the following thirteen conditions be included with the approval: 1. Enrollment shall not exceed 2400 full-time equivalent students. 2. The Northwestern College Master Plan shall be subject to a review by the Planning Commission and City Council every five years in order to review general activity on the campus and to evaluate compliance with the Master Plan. These reviews shall include, but not be limited to, reviewing enrollment, parking conditions, landscaping/screening, site plans, construction projects, other needed mitigation measures, and overall progress on and compliance with the Master Plan. The first review shall occur no later than five years after the date of approval by the City Council. Amendments to the Campus Master Plan shall require public hearings whether or not they occur the same time as the five year revIew. 3. The applicant shall amend the Master Plan to comply with the applicable comments in the February 5, 2007, letter from the Fire Marshal; the February 16, 2007, memo from the Building Official; and the March 1,2007, memo from the Civil Engineer. 4. The central parking structure (Building 23 on the Northwestern College Master Plan Scope) shall be designed so that vehicles are not required to traverse the relocated ring road when exiting the parking structure. 5. Relocating any campus road shall require a site plan review and public hearing before the Planning Commission and approval from the City Council prior to construction. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor March 7, 2007 \\Metro-inet.us'<3rdenhills\Planning\Planning Cases\2006\06-o37 Northwestern College Master Plan (PENDING)\030707 - PC Report- Northwestern College Master Plan.doc Page 70f9 6. Lighting from any new or remodeled structures, parking lots, or roads shall be prohibited from shining directly onto adjacent properties and shall not exceed the lighting limitations in the Zoning Code. 7. A road connection to the campus shall be strictly prohibited in the City of Arden Hills, which shall include a prohibition on connecting a road to Asbury Avenue and Shorewood Drive. 8. Construction of new buildings entirely on the Roseville portion of the campus shall not require a permit from Arden Hills but construction plans shall be submitted to Arden Hills prior to construction to include in the Northwestern College address file. 9. All construction activities shall require a permit from the Rice Creek Watershed District and any other applicable regulatory agency prior to any building permits being issued by the City. 10. Except for walkways, no impervious surfaces shall be constructed within the fifty foot lake setback. 11. Any building exceeding the height limit of the underlying R-l Zone shall require an approved height variance prior to construction. 12. Northwestern College shall meet all regulatory requirements and standards in place at the time of development unless the College receives an approved variance or other deviation in accordance with State Statutes, City Codes, Rice Creek Watershed District, and other regulatory agencies. 13. The Master Plan shall be subject to all conditions and regulations set by the City of Roseville. Options & Proposed Motion Lanl!ual!e 1. Recommend Approval with Conditions: Motion to recommend armroval of Planning Case 06-037 for a Campus Master Planned Unit Development for Northwestern College at 3003 Snelling Ave N based on the submitted plans as amended by the thirteen conditions in Planning Case 06-037. 2. Recommend Approval as Submitted: Motion to recommend armroval of Planning Case 06- 037 for a Campus Master Planned Unit Development for Northwestern College at 3003 Snelling Ave N based on the submitted plans. 3. Recommend Denial: Motion to recommend denial of Planning Case 06-037 for a Campus Master Planned Unit Development for Northwestern College at 3003 Snelling Ave N based on the following findings: findings to deny should specifically reference the reasons for denial and why those reasons cannot be mitigated. 4. Table: Motion to table Planning Case 06-037 for a Campus Master Planned Unit Development for Northwestern College at 3003 Snelling Ave N: a specific reason and information request should be included with a motion to table. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor March 7, 2007 \\MetroMinet.us\ardenhills\Planning\Planning Cases\2006\06-037 Northwestern College Master Plan (PENDING)\030707 - PC Report- Northwestern College Master Plan.doc Page 8 of9 Deadline for Aeencv Actions The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on January 22,2007. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statute, the City must act on this request by March 22, 2007 (60 days). However, if the City provides the applicant with written reasons for an extension, the review period can be extended an additional sixty days to May 22, 2007. The City may, with the petitioners' consent, extend the review period past May 22,2007. Attachments 3D-l Letters Submitted by the Applicant 3D-2 Questions/Concerns from the February Planning Commission meeting 3D-3 February PC 06-037 Memo 3D-4 Traffic/Stormwater Evaluation Memo from Roseville 3D-5 Building Official, City Engineer, and Fire Marshal Review 3D-6 Letters from a Nearby Resident 3D-7 Topographic Map City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor March 7, 2007 \\Metro-inet.us\ardenhills\Planning\Planning Cases\2006\06-037 Northwestern College Master Plan (PENDING)\030707 - PC Report- Northwestern College Master Plan.doc Page9of9 ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - MARCH 7,2007 5 D. PLANNING CASE #06-037 CAMPUS MASTER PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT; NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE; 3003 SNELLING AVENUE NORTH Mr. Lehnhoff stated the applicant was requesting approval of a proposed updated Master Plan for their campus. Staff stated that if the Planning Commission recommended the Northwestern College Master Plan for approval, Staff recommends including the following thirteen conditions: 1. Enrollment shall not exceed 2400 full-time equivalent students. 2. The Northwestern College Master Plan shall be subject to a review by the Planning Commission and the City Council every five years in order to review general activity on the campus and to evaluate compliance with the Master Plan. These reviews shall include, but not be limited to, reviewing enrollment, parking conditions, landscaping/screening, site plans, construction projects, other needed mitigation measures, and overall progress on and compliance with the Master Plan. The first review shall occur no later than five years after the date of approval by the City Council. Amendments to the Campus Master Plan shall require public hearings whether or not they occur the same time as the five year review. 3. The applicant shall amend the Master Plan to comply with the applicable comments in the February 5,2007, letter from the Fire Marshal; the February 16, 2007, memo from the Building Official; and the March 1,2007, memo from the Civil Engineer. 4. The central parking structure (Building 23 on the Northwestern College Master Plan Scope) shall be designed so that vehicles are not required to traverse the relocated ring road when exiting the parking structure. 5. Relocating the campus road shall require a site plan review and public hearing before the Planning Commission and approval from the City Council prior to construction. 6. Lighting from any new or remodeled structures, parking lots, or roads shall be prohibited from shining directly onto adjacent properties and shall not exceed the lighting limitations in the Zoning Code. 7. A road connection to the campus shall be strictly prohibited in the City of Arden Hills, which shall include a prohibition on connecting a road to Asbury Avenue and Shorewood Drive. 8. Construction of new buildings entirely on the Roseville portion of the campus shall not require a permit from Arden Hills but construction plans shall be submitted to Arden Hills prior to construction to include in the Northwestern College address file. 9. All construction activities shall require a permit from the Rice Creek Watershed District and any other applicable regulatory agency prior to any building permits being issued by the City. 10. Except for walkways, no impervious surfaces shall be constructed within the fifty foot lake setback. 11. Any building exceeding the height limit of the underlying R-l Zone shall require an approved height variance prior to construction. 12. Northwestern College shall meet all regulatory requirements and standards in place at the time of development unless the College receives an approved variance ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - MARCH 7, 2007 6 or other deviation in accordance with State Statutes, City Codes, Rice Creek Watershed District, and other regulatory agencies. 13. The Master Plan shall be subject to all conditions and regulations set by the City of Roseville. Commissioner Holewa asked what happened if they had 2500 students. Mr. Lehnhoff responded they would be in violation of their Master Plan, which would affect any future development projects on the campus. Chair Sand noted the Planning Commission had received a letter dated February 28, 2007, from TKDA addressing the issues raised at the February 7,2007 public hearing. Jay Lindgren, of Dorsey & Whitney, representing the applicant, stated they supported all of the conditions that had been presented by staff. He reviewed the letter dated February 28, 2007, which included student enrollment, the ring road, parking garages, accesses, natural protection areas, buckthorn removal plan, changes and modifications made to Master Plan, noise concerns, and the elevation of Student Life Center. Chair Sand opened the public hearing at 8:33 p.m. Chair Sand invited anyone for or against the request to come forward and make comment. Theresa Gonske and Jolm Rock, 1955 Glenpaul Avenue, stated they were in support of the development being planned. They stated they were impressed with Northwestern College addressing the concerns that the residents had and they saw this as a positive influence in the community. However, they also understood the concerns of the residents who bordered the campus. Kerstin Leonard, 1954 Edgewater Avenue, stated she has been a resident for almost 20 years and she considered herself a neighbor of Northwestern College. She stated she was in support of the PUD plan. She noted the College was a good business for the community. Al Mason, 3208 Shorewood Drive, stated he agreed with the positive impact the College had on the community. He asked to what extent they had considered some sort of a shuttle service to relieve some traffic concerns. He believed the biggest impact would be traffic. He noted Bethel's perspective was outward and it appeared Northwestern was an inward perspective with not a lot of thought about the impact on the neighborhood. He asked what the building would look like. He thanked the College for working with the community and removing the buckthorn. Barbara Y ounoszai, 1574 Glenhill Road, stated she was against the proposal, but she did respect and admire the College. She noted she was an educator herself and did not have any issues with the College. She stated in her opinion it was time for the College to find a satellite site where they could grow as they needed to grow. She indicated this was not new for institutions like Northwestern who found themselves in the midst of a residential area. She asked the College to look at this proposal. She stated if the plan were to proceed, she stated it would impact the residents along the fence. She indicated a berm and trees would not be sufficient. She noted two or three times in the last year something ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - MARCH 7, 2007 7 had gone wrong with the two or three utility poles along the property line and the repairs took weeks. She noted if the berm was higher the utility companies would not be able to reach the wires. She stated there was also constant traffic now and she was concerned about future traffic. She presented pictures of her property. She noted right now there was a light from the campus that came right into her family room. She stated they had lost their privacy. She suggested the ring road be a two-way road. She expressed concern about the increase in noise. Nancy Jacobson, 3188 Asbury, stated the neighborhood was special and a development like this would be a great impact to the neighborhood. She asked for an estimate of the number of cars going by her home on a daily basis. She asked the College to prepare an EA W for this site. Marybeth Daly, 1556 Edgewater Avenue, requested a permanent ban on coming into their area. She noted they had fought this over 30 years ago. She stated if they felt they had to have another exit, she did not want it to be in her neighborhood. Michael Remmers, 3160 Ridgewood Road, stated change was sometimes hard to accept, but the College was not the same as it was years ago. He stated it might be time to start considering alternative sites for their development. He noted at some point it became "trying to get a fat lady into a tight girdle" and he believed that was the point the College was at now. He stated the changes being requested would be an inconvenience to the community. He stated the residents' concerns were real and were more than just inconveniences. He indicated this development would have a direct impact to their property values. He stated he was concerned about the additional traffic being proposed. He asked if the parking ramp could be located on the south end where the other parking ramp was located. He believed this would make it more consistent with the industrial and commercial buildings located along Snelling Avenue. He noted the parking ramp could serve the administrative people in the Edina Building as well as the students. He did not believe it was necessary for the students to have immediate access to the campus buildings from the parking areas. Bruce Haglund, 3300 Lake Johanna Boulevard, stated the College had been a great neighbor to the community. He stated if the College left, the new occupants may not have as good of behavior. Asks what would replace them as occupants of the property. If that occurred, they would have no control over what they would get and he believed they should be allowed some leeway on this proposal. Steve Erickson, 3442 Siems Court, stated he was in favor of this proposal. He believed the concerns of the residents were real and he understood that, but he believed the stewardship the College has taken for the shoreline was well maintained and this added to the quality of the lake. He noted they had spent a lot of time evaluating the potential developments and the impact on the watershed and how to control that. Bruce Eisenmenger, 504 Edgewater Avenue, stated he was the President of the Arden Hills Association Number 3. He noted the College had been a good neighbor, but the real issue is the threshold of growth for that piece of property and the impact the proposed changes had on the immediate neighborhood. He stated they prided themselves on the neighborhood and the community and the big concern was that the threshold for growth for the College and how they achieved that growth in a responsible manner. He ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - MARCH 7, 2007 8 expressed concern about the ring road. He stated the real concern was if the road was moved to the east closer to the residential area. Commissioner Larson asked ifhe believed the berming would help to mitigate lights and visual to the neighborhood. Mr. Eisenmenger responded if there was berming now where the road currently exists, it might help, but if the road was moved further to the east, he was not sure that could be accomplished. Commissioner Larson stated since the road was being bermed and planted, did he think: it would positively affect the noise issues. Mr. Eisenmenger responded he believed it was an attempt to mitigate the issue, but he believed it would take extensive berming and landscaping to mitigate the worsening conditions. He stated he appreciated the consideration in allowing two-way traffic. He asked with the proposed loop road, would there still be the complete loop and was it necessary or would there be other alternatives with the road to the west in terms of the northern campus buildings. He requested a more extensive study with alternatives to the loop road. Mr. Eisenmenger stated as a representative of the neighborhood association this was not just an issue for the neighbors who lived along Asbury, but it was a concern of the entire neighborhood. Ed Dickenson, 3188 Asbury, asked if they needed the ring road. He pointed out on the diagram another way the traffic could come in and out of the College without having the ring road. He noted if they eliminated the ring road, it would eliminate a lot of problems. Nancy Jacobson, 3188 Asbury, stated there were many mature trees on the campus that she believed would be removed to put up a six-foot berm and she was not sure what that would accomplish. She asked the Commission to not look at this as a solution. Mr. Lindgren stated with respect to shuttle service, they have had many conversations with Roseville about a circulator service. He noted the campus was not served by Metro Transit and they needed to figure out how to deal with that issue. He stated with respect to the parking ramp, there were two things that they had thought about in order to minimize that parking facility including the maintenance of all of the trees that already existed and although the actual structure would be part of the final site review, this ramp would just be an extension of the existing parking area with additional parking underneath the parking lot. Since the top of the parking lot would be at grade, he believed the visual impact would be minimal. Commissioner Larson asked if the parking ramp would be a substitute for the surface parking. Mr. Lindgren responded that was correct and that was one of the reasons for the centralized parking. He noted the parking was not only a convenience for the students and the administration, but it was also a convenience for the other activities they held on the campus. He noted the berm could be designed with gating so there was access to utilities and they would work with the utility companies to get this right. He noted there were fewer trees now because of storms and what this project would do was to increase the number of trees along the fence. He stated the reason for the ring road was the need for a centralized campus. Another reason is to maintain traffic and safety issues. He noted the road also had two other functions including a run-way road to minimize impervious surface and to minimize the impact to the lake and run-off. He noted a two- ARDEN HILLS PLANNlNG COMMISSION - MARCH 7, 2007 9 way road would have the potential for greater surface water run-off near Lake Johanna. He stated he was not sure ifthis was a two-way road how far to the north it would be able to go. With respect to the EA W, he did not believe it was necessary, nor was it required or mandatory to have an EA W at this time for the reason that they were adopting a PUD and they still had final site plan review and if a EA W was necessary it would be before that final site plan review. Commissioner Thompson inquired about the parking spaces. She asked if some parking would be eliminated. She asked with the new ring road would there be side parking. She asked if some of the surface parking areas would be eliminated. A staff member from the College pointed out where the current surface parking lot was located. He noted since the final site plan had not been completed, he estimated they would lose about 170-175 parking spaces they currently had. Commissioner Thompson stated she was concerned about the direct run-off into the lake. She stated she wanted more information on rain gardens they were proposing to put in on during the site plan review process for future construction. An employee ofTKDA stated there was a lot of vacant space and there would be an opportunity to do rain gardens. He noted the College was concerned about drainage into the lake. Commissioner Modesette asked how many surface parking spots were there currently along the road and how many were there in small lots. A staff member from the College responded on the entire campus there were a grand total of 1,400 parking spots and the overall plan included 2,100 parking spaces. He stated on the north side of the campus, there was probably 400-500 parking spots north of the "Y" at the present time, but he would need to look this up for the exact number. He noted they would lose 175 parking spots. He stated there was a conscious decision to locate the parking ramp where it was to hide it in the hill and to serve the campus the best way. He noted they did have a shuttle that ran to the dorm facilities and they would also be adding to the shuttle service to minimize cars coming onto the campus facility. Commissioner Stodola asked if they had thought about upgrading the fence for further screening. A staff member from the College noted they had not thought about this until the storm went through and they lost trees, but they were open to this discussion. Chair Sand inquired about alternative designs that could be considered. He asked if there was any way the existing ring road that was presently there could still be used by reconfiguring the green and moving the life center from east to west to north to south. He noted the science building could be moved over slightly also. He indicated this would eliminate them from having to spend the money on a ring road. He asked if the ring road as proposed were to go in, would there be some consideration to burying utilities. He asked if the ring road were eliminated, how would that impact emergency vehicle access to the buildings in the comer. A staff member from the College responded when they sought professional assistance on design, they addressed the capacity issues and with that came the concept of the placement of the buildings to create a certain type of a campus feeling with the green space. He noted there was a significant amount of pedestrian traffic that moved between the buildings, which created a significant safety hazard. The ring road was recommended to eliminate a significant safety hazard on campus. He noted the walkway would be underneath the road on the ring road. He stated this was the motivating factor for the ring road. Second, relative to the utilities, they had brought up ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - MARCH 7, 2007 10 to Xcel the suggestion of burying the cable, who indicated they would do that at the College's expense if they wanted to, but this would affect the neighbors because they would need to bury their lines also and they decided they did not want to entertain that option at this time. With respect to emergency vehicles, he stated if traffic was brought in two-ways, they would need to turn traffic around and they would need to address this with the Fire Marshal. Chair Sand asked if the size of the ramp in Arden Hills was a given, or could the other ramp be enlarged. A staff member from the College responded there was a significant slope where they were proposing the new ramp and it would be difficult to make it larger and that was why they planned it the way they had. Chair Sand closed the public hearing at 9:53 p.m. Mr. Lehnhoff stated he had reviewed the memo from the Fire Marshal and it stated the College would need to have fire lanes around all existing building and new buildings to have access for emergency situations. He stated with respect to the storm water run-off, staff preferred to not be specific on the maps in the Master Plan because the storm water regulations were getting stricter and whatever the newest stricter standard would apply during future site plan reviews. With respect to the EA W, he had contacted the Environmental Quality Board and they confirmed that this Master Plan proposal did not fall under the mandatory EA W, but Roseville and Arden Hills could request one if they wanted. He stated staff wanted to see in the conditions to have a definition of a full-time student in the Master Plan itself. He stated the conditions needed to be incorporated into the Master Plan itself also. Chair Sand asked if the College had offered voluntarily to do an EA W. Mr. Lindgren responded that was correct and most of the work had already been done, but they obviously did not want to incur additional unnecessary costs either. He recommended they discuss this with the Council and if they want an EA W, then it be made as a part of the conditions. Commissioner Larson moved, seconded by Commissioner Thompson to approve Planning Case No. 006-037 for a Campus Master Planned Unit Development for Northwestern College at 3003 Snelling Avenue North based on the submitted plans as amended by the thirteen conditions in Planning Case 06-037 and modifY Condition 1 to add a definition ofFTE within the Master Plan. Commissioner Larson stated the reasons he made the motion was because this was a Master Plan approval, the city and the residents would have adequate opportunity to address problems as development continued and if problems were incurred during this process they could be addressed at that time. He stated the loop road was a necessary item for fire protection on the site and if the road was obstructed by a storm, it was necessary to have an alternative way to access the northern buildings. He stated he was confident the storm water plan that was being worked on would be adequate to protect the lake and he believed they had seen a lot of support and no negative comments on the conduct of Northwestern College through the meetings they have had and all issues had been addressed. He noted he would not put a condition for an EA W and he believed this was something better left to the Council. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - MARCH 7, 2007 11 Commissioner Thompson stated she also agreed with Commissioner Larson. She stated she appreciated the information shared tonight and she saw a strong standpoint that the College wanted to work with the residents. She stated she saw this as an improvement and from a traffic perspective in the long term, this would be an improvement. Commissioner Stodola stated she had one reservation and that was that there were several homes closer to the College that bordered it and would be negatively impacted, but at the same time she heard how good a neighbor the College has been and how willing they were to work with the neighbors. She felt there were still areas where they could provide privacy with individual neighbors in a fashion that could be mutually agreeable. Chair Sand stated he would prefer to have more information with alternatives regarding the ring road and he was not sure there had been full consideration given and ifhe had an option, he would like to table this for more information. He stated he would have preferred to have had the information given to them before tonight's meeting. Commissioner Larson stated they could add a condition that the landscape plan would need to show more detail for the Council meeting. Commissioner Thompson stated she would also agree with this. Commissioner Larson offered, and Commissioner Thompson accepted, condition number 14 to require Northwestern College to submit a landscaping plan for along the eastern border of the campus prior to the Council review. The motion with the fourteen conditions carried unanimously (6-0). Attachment 3D-4 February 7,2007, Planning Case 06-037 Memo (w /0 attachments) and meeting minutes ~ ~HlLLS October 3,2007, Planning Commission Meeting ~ ~HILLS MEMORANDUM DATE: February 7,2007 PC Agenda Item 3.D TO: Planning Commission FROM: James Lehnhoff, City Planner SUBJECT: PC # 06-037 Northwestern College (TKDA is the planning consultant for the College) Campus Master Planned Unit Development 3003 Snelling Avenue North Requested Action Northwestern College is requesting review of a proposed updated Master Plan. Meetinl! and Review Process Although the February Planning Commission meeting will include a public hearing for the Northwestern College Campus Master Planned Unit Development, this meeting will only be an informational hearing. The Planning Commission is not being asked to provide a recommendation to the City Conncil at the February meeting. The goal of the February meeting is to review the proposal, address potential issues, and ask questions. If Northwestern College's consultants and City Staff are able to obtain the answers to the questions from the February meeting, the public hearing will be continued at the March 7, 2007, Planning Commission meeting. If appropriate, the Planning Commission will then be asked to make a recommendation for the City Council's March 26, 2007, meeting. Northwestern College is also going through the PUD review process in the City ofRoseville. The Roseville Planning Commission will be holding the same type of two step review process as Arden Hills. Although, the Roseville Planning Commission is also scheduled for February 7, 2007, their meeting starts at 6pm and Northwestern College is the first item on their agenda. TKDA, the planning consultants for Northwestern College, plan on attending both meetings. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor February 7, 2007 \\Metro-inet.us\ardenhills\Planning\Planning Cases\2006\06-037 Northwestern College Master Plan (PENDING)\020707 - PC Report- Northwestern College Master Plan.doc Page 1 of 12 Back2round 1. Overview of Request Although the submitted Plan is technically an amendment to the Master Plan that as approved in 1991, it is essentially a new more comprehensive Master Plan for the College. Notable changes to the campus in the Master Plan proposal include: . Increasing the building square footage from 656,306 square feet to 1,068,091 square feet; . Increasing the student population from approximately 1650 students to 2400 students; . Increasing the number of parking stalls from approximately 1400 stalls to 2090 stalls. . Reconfiguring the main internal road on the Campus; . Installing stormwater control measures around existing and proposed buildings; and, . Constructing a "Campus Green" on the northern side of the Campus. The new building space would be used for academic, administrative, and athletic purposes. The Master Plan, including student growth, new and renovated building, and parking expansion, would be implemented over a 12 to 20 year period. The 1991 plan was not as detailed as the current proposal, and the new proposed Master Plan provides significantly more information and mitigation measures regarding stormwater management, parking, and traffic. No variances or changes to the underlying zoning are being requested with this application. 2. The Master Planning Process The proposed Master Plan is a form of a Campus Master Planned Unit Development (PUD), and the proposed Plan would replace the Master Plan that was approved in 1991. Smaller PUDs typically have at least two public meetings--one for the Master Plan and one for the Final Plan (Section 1320.14 ofthe Zoning Code). Generally, the Master Plan lays out the design and concept for a development, and the Final Plan incorporates any changes required by the City to mitigate the impacts ofthe development. The Final Plans are usually detailed and include a specific construction timetable. In the case of Northwestern College, and other large PUDs in the City, there will not be a Final Plan stage. Instead, the Master Plan outlines the overall development plan for the Campus, an estimated development timeline, the impacts of the plan, and potential mitigation measures. A Campus Master Plan is less detailed in terms of architecture, landscaping, and stormwater management because the Plan covers a longer timeframe and changes may need to be made before a particular part of the Plan is implemented. However, as each part of the City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor February 7, 2007 \\Metro-inet.us\ardenhills\Planning\Planning Cases\2006\06-Q37 Northwestern College Master Plan (pENDING)\020707 - PC Report- Northwestern College Master Plan.doc Page 2 of 12 Master Plan is implemented, the College will be required to return to the City for a Site Plan Review. During the Site Plan Review for a particular building or change to the campus, the College would submit a detailed construction, landscaping, stormwater management, and other plans required by the City. The Site Plan Review process requires review from the Planning Commission and approval from the City Council before any permits are issued. Having a Master Plan in place allows the College to plan for the future with some certainty and it makes it easier for the City and neighborhood to know what changes may be made at the College over the next 12 to 20 years. The College can also prepare mitigation measures in advance based on City and neighborhood concerns. 3. Past Northwestern College Planning Cases The City has reviewed the following planning cases for Northwestern College: 2004-11 Site Plan Review (Al 6/28/2004 Riley Hall Renovation 1996-22 Planned Unit (Al 12/9/1996 Amendment to allow change in Full-Time Development/Campus Equivalent (FTE) student enrollment from 1250 Master Plan Amendment to 1650 1991-17 Site Plan Review (Al 10/15/1991 Sernsten Resource Center (Library) 1991-04 Planned Unit (A) 6/24/1991 Amendment to allow colleges as permitted by Development/Campus PUD in R-1 and R-2; Concept/Master Plan for Master Plan expansion 1985-04 Conditional Use Permit (Al 5/3/1985 Satellite Dishes 4. The 1991 Northwestern College Campus Master Plan and 1996 Plan Amendment The 1991 plan was the first full Campus Planned Unit Development for the College that is on record with the City. While the 1991 outlined growth for the Campus, it did not include a specific phasing of growth or tools to mitigate the impact of the growth. The new Master Plan includes significantly more detail regarding proposed growth, stormwater management, traffic & parking, and other details regarding the Campus. The 1996 amendment permitted the college to expand from 1250 students to 1600. The proposal in this application would increase enrollment from the current maximum of 1650 students to 2400 students over the next 12 to 20 years. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor February 7, 2007 \\Metro-inet.us\ardenhills\Planning\Planning Cases\2006\06-Q37 Northwestern College Master Plan (PENDING)\020707 - PC Report- Northwestern College Master Plan.doc PageS of 1 2 S. Site Data North Lake Johanna South (Roseville) Institutional Planned Unit Develo ment Zone Institutional East Low Density Residential R-I: Single Family Residential Single Family Residential West Low Density Residential R-I: Single Family Residential Single Family Residential 6. Surrounding Area P\!: Public & Institutional Institutional: Higher Education R-I: Single Family Residential 42.69 Acres in Arden Hills, 64.31 Acres in Roseville, and 107 Acres total With Staff, the total campus usage would be 3,082 or about 29 people per acre. Variable. Steep slope toward Lake Johanna and Little Lake Johanna. Generally flat in the central ortions of the ca us. Plan Review and Findinl!:s The underlying zoning for Northwestern College is R-l. However, the campus is currently operating under a Campus Master Planned Unit Development (PUD) and the City can permit deviations from certain underlying zoning regulations within the PUD area. 1. Minimum Lot Area 5 2. Minimum Lot Size ft, width/de th 3. He; ht ft.) 4. Lot Covered b Structure 5. Min. Landsca e Lot Area 14,000 95/130 35 25% 65% 6. Minimum Building Setbacks ft 40 30 10 Side Yard Interior - Principal (Min/total both ards on lot 10/25 Side Yard Interior - Accesso 10 Side Yard Corner 40 Lake 50 City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor February 7, 2007 \\Metro-inet.us\ardenhi11s\Planning\Planning Cases\2006\06-037 Northwestern College Master Plan (PENDING)\020707 - PC Report- Northwestern College Master Plan.doc Page 4 of J2 1. Lot Setbacks - Meets Requirements Although the POD Application report states that the setback from Lake Johanna is seventy- five (75) feet, the setback is actually fifty (50) feet. Regardless, no new buildings or impervious surface is being proposed within the lake setback. Since the College is located in the R-l Zone, the side setback is a total of twenty-five (25) feet with a minimum often (10) feet on one side. Given the size of the property, there are not any side yard encroachment issues. However, the use ofthe property is different than the adjacent residential areas and a greater side setback for structures and roads may be warranted. For example, a ten (10) foot setback along the eastern side of the property may be insufficient for the main campus road if it is relocated as proposed. A side setback of forty (40) or more feet would provide significantly more room for visual screening and sound buffering to separate the neighboring residential uses from the College. 2. Impervious Coverage/Landscaped Area - Meets Requirements Impervious and Structure Coverage b City and Total Existing Pronosed Maximum sauare feet sauare feet snuare feet Structure Coverage 132,316 7% 179,550 10% 464,894 25% Arden Hills Impervious Coverage 515,155 28% 583,166 31% 650,852 35% LandscaDed Area 1,344,421 72% 1,276,410 69% No Maximum Lot Size 1,859,576 1,859,576 1,859,576 Structure Coverage 99,555 4% 135,733 5% Roseville Imnervious Coverage 436,235 16% 533,933 19% Landscaped Area 2,365,109 84% 2,267,411 81% No Maximum Lot Size 2,801,344 2,801,344 2,801,344 Structure Coverage 231,871 5% 315,283 7% Total Imnervious Coverage 951,390 20% 1,117,159 24% 1,117,159 24% Landscaoed Area 3,709,530 80% 3,543,761 76% No Maximum Lot Size 4,660,920 4,660,920 4.660,920 I The entire campus is approximately 107 acres or 4,660,920 square feet. With all of the proposed buildings and impervious surface, the landscaped area of the entire campus would decrease from eighty (80) percent of the lot area to seventy-six (76) percent of the lot area. The R-l Zone normally requires at least sixty-five (65) percent of the property to be landscaped. Landscaped area includes all land not covered by a building or other impervious surface. The impervious area did not increase as much as one would expect with this proposal because the Plan includes a new parking garage, which reduces the need for surface parking lots, and portions of new buildings are proposed to be constructed over existing impervious surfaces. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor February 7, 2007 \\Metro~inet.us\ardenhi11s\Planning\Planning Cases\2006\06-037 Northwestern College Master Plan (PENDING)\020707 - PC Report- Northwestern College Master Plan.doc Page 5 of 12 The portion of the Campus within Arden Hills does meet the underlying requirements of the R-l Zone. The additional buildings and impervious surface would not cause the Campus to exceed the twenty-five (25) percent structure limit or the thirty-five (35) percent impervious coverage limit. The Roseville portion of the Campus is within a Planned Unit Development Zone, which means that the impervious and structure coverage limit may vary in Roseville depending on the type of development. Nevertheless, if the entire Campus were within Arden Hills, it would still meet the full requirements of the underlying R-l Zone. 3. Structure Square Footage - Meets Requirements The structure coverage is just the footprint of the buildings on the Campus. The total building square footage is proposed to increase from 656,306 to 1,068,091 square feet or about 62.7 percent. The Plan proposes to increase from thirteen (13) to twenty-five (25) buildings on the entire campus of which five of the existing buildings are on the Arden Hills side of the campus. The Master Plan proposes to construct or expand five buildings entirely on the Arden Hills side of the campus and one structure, a parking garage, would straddle the border between Arden Hills and Roseville. Map Number Buildino Location 1 Island Chaoel Arden Hills 2 Nazareth Hall Arden Hills 3 Totino Fine Arts Center Arden Hills 4 Bernsten Library Arden Hills 5 Rilev Hall Arden Hills Arden Hills/Roseville (To Be 6 Tennis Courts Removed) '" 7 Mover Dormitorv Roseville c "' 8 Ericksen Center Roseville ~ 'R w 9 Knutson/Hartill Rosevllfe 10 South Terrace Dorms Roseville Mel Johnson Media 11 Center Roseville 12 Dormitorv Roseville (To Be Removed) 13 Dormitorv Ros6ville 14 Dormitorv Roseville 15 Academic Buildina Arden Hills 16 Music Addition Arden Hills 17 ParkinglMaintenance Arden Hills 'C Community Life Center " 18 Arden Hills ~ 0 Co 19 Librarv Addition Arden Hills l? ll. Academic 20 General/Science Arden Hills 21 Parkina Structure Arden Hills/Roseville City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor February 7, 2007 \\Metro~inet.us\ardenhills\Planning\Planning Cases\2006\06-Q37 Northwestern College Master Plan (PENDING)\020707 - PC Report- Northwestern College Master Plan.doc Page 6 of 12 22 Fieldhouse Roseville 23 Visitor/Alumni Center Roseville 24 Undetermined RosevHle 25 Dormitorv Rosevllle Based on a floor area ratio of .3, the City could permit up to 557,872 square feet of building space on the Arden Hills side of the campus and up to 1,398,276 square feet of building space throughout the campus. The Master Plan would not exceed the building floor area ratio limit. It should be noted that the exact size and layout of the proposed new or expanded buildings may slightly change when full plans are brought through the Site Plan Review process. 4. Landscaping ~ Determined during Site Plan Review process A landscaping plan is usually not required in the R-l Zone; however, in the case of a PUD, the landscaping plan is important because it helps to mitigate the somewhat more intensive uses often associated with PUDs. Since there are residential areas to the east and west of Northwestern College in Arden Hills, it is imperative that sufficient screening be required with each modification or expansion to the campus to ensure that the residential areas are not negatively impacted by changes at the College. Page II of the PUD Application report outlines the general guidelines for landscaping. As noted earlier, detailed landscaping plans would be submitted as each section of the Plan is implemented. However, the Plan does specifically call for additional coniferous trees and berms along the eastern side of the property and the removal of invasive species. For new or expanded buildings, the Zoning Code's procedural manual provides minimum landscaping requirements. In most cases, only new or expanded buildings would trigger the City's landscaping requirements. However, Northwestern College is proposing to relocate a portion of the main campus road to the eastern side of the campus thereby bringing the road closer to the residential areas that are adjacent to the College. Year round screening will be needed, which may include berms, to protect the neighboring residential area from the noise and lights of traffic on the campus road. Relocating the campus road should be required to go through the site plan review process to ensure that sufficient screening is being provided. 5. Architectural Standards ~ No City Specified Requirement/or the R-I Zone The R-l Zone does not have specific building material requirements or restrictions. However, on page 13 of the PUD Application Report, there Plan does call for". .. continuing the architectural character of the existing buildings on campus and will ensure that the new City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor February 7, 2007 \\Metro-inet.us\ardenhilIs\Planning\Planning Cases\2006\06-037 Northwestern College Master Plan (PENDING)\020707 - PC Report- Northwestern College Master Plan.doc Page 7 of 12 structures are similar in character to the existing campus." The PUD Application Report includes the design of number potential buildings in the appendix; however, the report does state that these designs are subject to change. The design of each building will be evaluated during the Site Plan Review process. The design of the building will greatly depend on the location of the building on the campus and the use ofthe building. 6. Building Height - Determined during Site Plan Review process Although the PUD Application Report refers to multi-story buildings, the College has not yet determined the actual height of future buildings. The height limit in the R-I Zone is 35 feet and to exceed that limit may require a variance in addition to site plan reviews for new or expanded buildings. This Master Plan does not grant approval for deviations from the height restrictions. 7. Parking, Traffic, Access, and Circulation - Under Review Traffic The applicants have submitted a Traffic and Parking Impact Study, which is included on the compact disk in Attachment 3D-3. While some vehicles certainly travel on roads that go through Arden Hills on their way to Northwestern College, the access points to the College are entirely within the City of Roseville. The City ofRoseville is evaluating the College's traffic study and a report will be provided to Arden Hills upon completion. Parking Northwestern College currently has about 1400 parking stall on the campus and, at their peak, are at 97 percent capacity according to the Traffic and Parking Impact Study. By 2018, the College is proposing to have a total of2090 parking spaces with a projected peak capacity of 93 percent. Much of the existing and proposed parking would be on the Arden Hills side of the campus. The City's Zoning Code does not have a specific parking requirement for higher education uses. In cases where the Zoning Code does not have a specific parking requirement for a particular use, the Zoning Code states that the City Council will set the requirement based on a recommendation from the Planning Commission (Section 1325.06 Subd 1.J). Currently, there are 2,164 students and staff for 1,400 parking spaces, which provides .65 parking spaces per person. At full build-out, the College is expecting a population of 3,082 students and staff for 2,090 parking spaces, which provides .68 parking spaces per person. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor February 7, 2007 \\Metro-inet.us\ardenhills\Planning\Planning Cases\2006\06-037 Northwestern College Master Plan (PENDING)\020707 - PC Report- Northwestern College Master Plan.doc Page 8 of 12 Since the parking to person ratio will increase slightly with the proposed expansion and since there is additional room on the campus for parking if needed, 2090 parking spaces is likely sufficient for the proposed uses and population. It should be noted that since Northwestern College does not have a vehicle entrance in Arden Hills, there should not be an issue with on- street parking in Arden Hills. As noted above, the College is proposing to construct two parking garage on the Campus. One of the garages would be entirely within Arden Hills and the other garage would straddle the border with Roseville. The parking garages would have a combined capacity of between 690 and 840 parking stalls. Circulation From the College's main entrance on Lydia Avenue in Roseville, there is one main campus road that bisects the campus along a north-south route. In order to increase safety and create a centralized "Campus Green," Northwestern College is proposing to relocate a portion of the main campus road from the central portion of the property to the eastern portion of the property near Asbury Avenue in Arden Hills. The road would encircle most of the buildings and parking lots on the Arden Hills side of the campus to create a ring road. While there would not be a connection to Asbury Avenue, this would bring vehicles closer to the neighboring residential areas. The College has included some references to landscaping and berms along their eastern property line to screen the road and traffic from neighboring residential areas. 8. Lighting - Determined during Site Plan Review process On page 13 of the PUD Application Report, it states that Northwestern College is committed to conforming to the City's light standards that limit casting light onto neighboring properties. The Zoning Code limits light to no more than .4 foot candles at the property line. The lighting for a new or expanded building would be addressed in detail during the site plan review process. Nevertheless, a condition restricting new lighting near residential areas may be warranted. 9. Stormwater Management - Determined during Site Plan Review process The 1991 Master Plan did not include any information regarding stormwater management. As noted in the PUD Application Report, Lake Johanna and Little Lake Johanna are classified as impaired lakes by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, which means that proper stormwater management is imperative for all development on the lake. Furthermore, the requirements for stormwater management have increased substantially since 1991. The applicants have submitted a detailed Stormwater Management Study for the entire City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor February 7, 2007 \\Metro-inet.us\ardenhills\Planning\Planning Cases\2006\06-037 Northwestern College Master Plan (pENDING)\020707 - PC Report- Northwestern College Master Plan.doc Page 90fl2 campus that addresses a number of environmental, drainage, and stormwater issues and how the impacts ofthe campus expansion can be mitigated (Attachment 3D-3). The Study also includes the applicable regulations that the College is subject to. The campus is divided into twelve watersheds, and the types of best management practice (BMP) that would be appropriate within each watershed is listed in the study. The appendix includes a description of each type of BMP and Figures 5 & 6 show where stormwater management features may be located. The Stormwater Study and proposed BMPs is not meant to prescribe the exact stormwater collection and treatment measures that will be implemented with each new or expanded building. Instead, the Study provides a toolbox of mitigation measures and best management practices that can be used before, during and after each stage of construction. Similar to the landscaping plan, a detailed stormwater management plan will need to be submitted with each proposed building or expansion on the Arden Hills side of the campus. The full study with a complete listing of the best management practices is in PDF format on the CD in Attachment 3D-3 and online at www.ci.arden-hills.mn.us. 10. Student Population The current student population is approximately 1,650 students, which is the maximum permitted by the Conditional Use Permit from 1996 (planning Case 96-22). The Master Plan proposes to increase the student population to 2400 by the year 2018, which is a 45.5 percent increase. The proposed growth per year can be seen on page 6 of the PUD Application Report. For comparison, Bethel University has approximately 2800 students at their Arden Hills campus. 11. Additional Review The Fire Marshal, City Attorney, and Building Official are reviewing the proposal and will have comments prepared for the March Planning Commission meeting. The City Engineer's comments are included in Attachment 3D-2. The comments are general in nature because more detailed reviews would be conducted as individual projects within the plan are constructed. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor February 7, 2007 \\Metro-inet.us\ardenhills\Planning\Planning Cases\2006\06-037 Northwestern College Master Plan (PENDING)\020707 - PC Report- Northwestern College Master Plan.doc Page10of12 Notice & Resident Comment Notice was published in the Arden Hills/Shoreview Bulletin, and although State Statutes only require a 350 feet radius for notifYing nearby property owners, notice was mailed to residents within one thousand (1000) feet of the subject property within the City of Arden Hills. The City of Roseville sent notices to those residents within Roseville. Staff Recommendation Staff is recommending that Planning Case #06-037, Campus Master Planned Unit Development, Northwestern College Master Plan, be tabled and the public hearing be continued to the March 7, 2007, Planning Commission meeting. Staff has compiled a short draft of potential conditions that may be placed on the Master Plan: 1. A minimum setback of 50(?) Feet from adjacent properties shall be incorporated into the Master Plan for all roads and structures. 2. Relocating the campus road shall require an approved Site Plan Review from the City Council prior to moving the road. 3. The Master Plan shall prohibit new lighting from shining directly onto adjacent properties and Lake Johanna. 4. The Master Plan shall also be subject to the conditions and regulations set by the City of Roseville. Options & Proposed Motion Lanl!ual!e Motion to table Planning Case 06-037, Campus Master Planned Unit Development for the Northwestern College Master Plan and to continue the public hearing at the March 7, 2007, Planning Commission meeting. The Planning Commission is not being asked to make a recommendation to the City Council at this time. Deadline for Al!encv Actions The City of Arden Hills received the completed application for this request on January 22, 2007. Pursuant to Minnesota State Statue, the City must act on this request by March 22, 2007 (60 days), unless the city provides the petitioner with written reasons for and additional 60 day review period. The City may, with the petitioners' consent, extend the review period beyond 120 days. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor February 7, 2007 \\Metro-inet.us\ardenhills\Planning\Planning Cases\2006\06-D37 Northwestern College Master Plan (pENDING)\020707 - PC Report- Northwestern College Master Plan.doc Page JJ of 12 Attachments 3D-l Air Photos 3D-2 Memo from the City Engineer 3D-3 PUD Application Report & Compact Disk with the Stormwater Management Study, Traffic Study, and Long Range Campus Master Plan Page 12 of 12 City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor February 7, 2007 \\Metro-inet.us\ardenhills\Planning\Planning Cases\2006\06-037 Northwestern College Master Plan (pENDING)\020707 - PC Report- Northwestern College Master Plan.doc ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - FEBRUARY 7, 2007 6 D. PUBLIC HEARING - PLANNING CASE 06-037: CAMPUS MASTER PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE, 3003 SNELLING AVENUE NORTH Mr. Lehnhoff stated the applicant was requesting review of a proposed updated Master Plan. He reviewed the highlights of the Master Plan for the Commission, explained the review process, and stated that the Commission is not being requested to make a recommendation to the City Council at tonight's meeting. This meeting will be an informational public hearing, which will allow TKDA, the consultants for Northwestern College, and Staff time to research and respond to questions from the Commission and residents at the meeting. Jay Lindgren, Dorsey and Whitney representing TKDA, stated there were core reasons for wanting to bring this forward - student demand and an exciting new initiative. He indicated they wanted to increase visibility and contributions and there was a need for an updated PUD. He summarized the background of the College and the PUD process. Dick Thompson, Senior Planner, TKDA, reviewed the proposed plan in detail. He reviewed the traffic and parking impact study and the stormwater management study. Commissioner Larson asked if they eventually wanted all students to stay on the campus. Mr. Lindgren responded they wanted freshmen to stay on the campus, but the overall goal was to provide as many on-campus students as possible. Doug Schroeder, Northwestern College, responded they were just under 60 percent residential and it was their desire to be at 70 percent. Councilmember Larson asked how many staff members were they proposing. Mr. Schroeder responded they were planning on approximately 700 staff members, where today there were approximately 500 staff members currently. He indicated this increase was figured into the parking plan. Chair Sand asked for statistics that indicated average students coming and going from campus. Mr. Lindgren responded that some of that information was included in the traffic study. He stated they could get more specific answers to this question for the next Planning Commission. Chair Sand stated he wanted the following information: number of students who commute by driving to campus; the number of students who come and go due to off campus jobs; the new road that would diverge to the east and be adjacent to several homes; what the traffic flow is on the ring road and whether this was an average daily volume; and will that change depending on whether students are coming and going from jobs. He asked if any of the ring road would be converted.to two-way traffic. Mr. Lindgren responded they would remain one way roads. Chair Sand asked if they would be adding a signalized intersection at Lydia and Fairview. Mr. Thompson responded that was correct and he believed that would happen no matter what Northwestern College did. ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - FEBRUARY 7, 2007 7 Chair Sand asked if they were considering adding a traffic signal to their entrance. Mr. Thompson responded that would be difficult, but they had considered widening the entrance up to make a right-hand turn lane. Chair Sand asked if they were plarming an exit/entry gate that would lead onto Asbury. Mr. Thompson responded that was not a part of their plan at all. Chair Sand opened the public hearing at 8:45 p.m. Chair Sand invited anyone for or against the request to come forward and make comment. He noted this was an informational public hearing and no action would be taken by the Commission. Chair Sand indicated staff had received two letters regarding the proposal, which have been made an official part of the City's records. The letters were form Marie P. Churchward, 3093 N. Ashbury, St. Paul and a joint letter from Nancy Jacobson, 3188 Asbury; Ed Menze, 3135 Asbury; Barbara Younsozai, 1574 Glenhill Road; and Scott Lindgren, 3103 Asbury. Fred Berndt, 1575 Edgewater Avenue, stated he was concerned about the large increase in the number of people proposed to be using the campus. He noted there was heavy traffic already on Lydia and now there would be more people added to the road. He expressed concern about the light pollution from the parking ramp. He asked if they were getting too many people for the amount of space that they have. He stated he lived in a quiet neighborhood and he wanted it to stay that way, but they see more and more activity. He believed there was going to be too many people for the residential area. Commissioner Larson asked if he believed the college had a negative impact on this property. Mr. Berndt responded he did not believe the college had a negative impact, and the only thing they have ever contacted the college about was some dead trees on the edge ofthe college's property. Mary Mee, 1520 Edgewater, stated this was a neighborhood with families. She noted the ring road was already there. Mr. Thompson responded the road she was talking about was a road west to the proposed road, which was not shown on the map. Mary Mee stated she was concerned about them wanting an access into their neighborhood. She stated they fought this in the courts in the 1970's when they wanted to enter into their neighborhood. She stated she did not want access into their neighborhood because it would ruin their neighborhood if all of the student traffic came in. She stated if this happened it would change the entire neighborhood. She stated she was opposed to anything that changed their neighborhood and she believed they would need to figure out some other accesses. Ed Dickinson, 3188 Asbury Avenue, stated he was concerned about the large proposal. He believed the proposal was too large of a proposal for a residential area. He believed this expansion would change their neighborhood forever. He stated they would be living within several yards of one of the buildings and they had concerns regarding noise, lights, etc., which he believed would make their property values go down. He stated he was concerned about how definite the PUD was and where Northwestern's idea or stand is ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - FEBRUARY 7, 2007 8 regarding the road they were proposing just across from his home as well as a new building. He asked what kind of landscaping, trees, berms, sound barriers were they proposing to put in. He asked for information regarding light and noise pollution. Daughter of Mary Churchward, 2173 Carroll Avenue, St. Paul, stated her mother lived in Roseville and she was concerned about the college dorm within 200 feet of her mother's back door. She questioned the density and the increase. She believed they were trying to put too much into a small area. She stated this was a community and a family and it would be difficult for the neighbors on Asbury to accept this plan. She asked them to not approve the proposed updated Master Plan. She believed they needed to look at another alternative to relocate. Nancy Jacobson, 3188 Asbury, stated she had sent the letter to the Planning Commission. She stated this neighborhood was a joint Arden Hills and Roseville area, which could at times be frustrating. She asked the two cities to work together with all of the residents on this issue. She stated this was a joint area and they wanted to be thought of as a joint area and work together with both cities. She expressed concern about the height of the new student hall, the noise, the lighting of the parking lot, the lighting on the perimeter road, and the lighting on the building. She stated by having a 50 percent increase in population and cars would have a significant impact to the residents in the area. She stated the college could make this more of a community by making it more of a walking community instead of a driving community. She expressed concern of the one-way ring road where everyone had to pass by her home. She expressed concern about most of the proposal going on along Ashbury. Carol Stellwagen, 3096 Ridgewood Road, expressed concern regarding the increase in traffic and the impact. She believed the transportation problem was much more broad than they were anticipating. She asked if the long-range the plan would be to have a lot more summer activities and how would the facility be used if they had more summer programs. She asked if some of the programs could be done at an auxillary site. Bruce Eisenmenger, 1504 Edgewater Avenue, President of Arden Hills Association #3, stated the college had been an excellent neighbor and it was a beautiful setting and this was nothing against Northwestern, but they wanted the plan to occur in the most thoughtful manner. He understood the college had the right to grow on their campus, but they were concerned about the density and the traffic flow and how this would impact the residents in the area. He stated the proposed perimeter drive was a big concern because they saw an increase in the growth ofthe campus and an increase in traffic. He requested they be sensitive to how this impacted the neighborhood. David Natale, 3159 Shorewood Drive, stated the only access they have if they needed to go east was by Lydia and Snelling and that intersection was a nightmare and adding more students would only make it worse. He stated the real issue was that there were students wandering out in the middle of the road crossing the street. He stated he has almost had numerous accidents and he believed the geography did not allow any more traffic. He noted another access road into the neighborhoods was also not a good idea because ofthe impact to the residents. He stated this was a safety concern and a bad idea. Chair Sand closed the public hearing at 9:15 p.m. to be reopened at the next Commission meeting. ARDEN HILLS PLANNlNG COMMISSION - FEBRUARY 7, 2007 9 Mr. Lehnhoff summarized the R-I Zoning and the PUD overlay. Commissioner Larson stated even without this proposed change, could the college stilI expand their student base. Mr. Lehnhoff responded they technically could not go beyond the amount previously approved by the City. Commissioner Larson asked if they had looked at signalizing the entrance further down Lydia as their main entrance. Mr. Thompson responded they had not looked at that option, but they would look at it. He believed there might be some history with the neighborhood with that entrance, which he would need to look into. Commissioner Thompson stated she used to live in this area and this exit was set up so the headlights would not shine into the neighborhood homes. She noted if this exit was used as a main entrance, they would need to look at the alignment of the road. Commissioner Thompson asked if the plans had been modified based on neighborhood comments. Mr. Thompson responded they had listened to the neighbors and had tried to work with them. Commissioner Thompson asked if they had considered any other parking options, which would not have any ramifications to the neighbors. Mr. Thompson responded he was not involved in the Master Planning process; it was possible, but it would get tight. He stated they might be able to engineer the ramp so it was a two way exit, which would eliminate all of the vehicles having to drive the ring road. Commissioner Modesette requested a summary of other activities and uses on the campus. She asked how much acreage Little Lake Johanna took up of their campus. Chair Sand asked what the intent of the field house location was. Mr. Schroeder responded the field house would be located above the road with the road going beneath the building. He stated the field house would be built on stilts over the road. Chair Sand requested the drawing be updated to show the road going under the building. He asked if the road could be used as an auxilIary traffic flow. He stated this might be an alternative traffic relieving arterial. Chair Sand asked if Little Lake Johanna had the same setback as major Lake Johanna. He asked if there was any possibility of moving Building 24 to where the parking ramp was, which would eliminate the dorms along the residential area. Mr. Lehnhoff responded there was a 50-foot setback on both lakes. Chair Sand stated he hoped they would come back with some specifics regarding the ring road and the light impact, noise, speed bumps, speeding, traffic noise, etc. He requested information on the impact of future programming on the ring road. He asked how the use of the campus would be different in the future than it was now. He asked if there would be more summer classes. He stated he liked the concept of the campus green concept and it was a nice way to deal with the campus to increase green space, but it was unfortunate it required the removal of the existing road. He requested further information on ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION - FEBRUARY 7, 2007 10 landscaping, benning, trees, planning, and possibly depressing the road from an elevation standpoint. He asked how they would protect the neighbors from noise. Chair Sand stated if anyone had further comments to email, call, or write to staff. Mr. Lehnhoff stated he encouraged people to call him to confinn this will be on the March agenda. He noted it could possibly be postponed to the April meeting depending on how much time it took to research answers to the questions. Chair Sand moved, seconded by Commissioner Larson to table Planning Case No. 06- 037, Campus Master Planned Unit Development, Northwestern College, 3003 Snelling Avenue N and to continue the public hearing at the March 7, 2007 Planning Commission meeting. The motion carried unanimously (4-0). MEMORANDUM DATE: October 3, 2007 PC Agenda Item 3.E TO: Planning Commission FROM: Meagan Beekman, Planner I James Lehnhoff, City Planner ~ SUBJECT: Planning Case #: 07-025 Recreational Vehicle Zoning Code Amendment City of Arden Hills ATTACHMENTS: 3E-l 3E-2 Current RV Zoning Code Proposed RV Zoning Code Amendment Requested Action Review the proposed recreational vehicle (RV) zoning code amendment and provide comments, changes, andlor a recommendation of approval. Back!!round In May 2007, Staff was directed by the Planning Commission and the City Council to examine the current zoning code regarding recreation vehicles. Staff was asked to clarify the definitions used for "recreational vehicle" as well as the methodology for measuring "length" and "height" of RVs. The primary goal of this amendment is to clarify the definitions and build consistency within the RV code. A draft of a revised RV code was proposed in May; however, the project was delayed for additional research. In response to the Council and Planning Commission's request, Staff analyzed the current code and reviewed codes from fifteen other communities in the metropolitan area. Comments and discussion were elicited from other City Staff, including the code enforcement officer and the building official. Based on these discussions and comparisons of the Arden Hills code to those of other communities, it became clear that there were additional opportunities to strengthen the RV code beyond simply clarifying the defmitions. Therefore, Staff is proposing additional language to simplify the regulations and reduce the potential impact ofRV s on neighboring properties. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor October 3, 2007 \lMetro-inet\ardenhillsIPlanninglPlanning Cases\2007107-025 RV Regulations Zoning Amendmentll00307 - PC Report - Rv Regulations.doc Page 1 of5 The RV ordinance as presented is being recommended for approval; however, there are a few discussion points that Staff requests further guidance from the Planning Commission. These items can be discussed and then incorporated into the proposed ordinance amendment as needed. Proposed RV Re!!ulations While the definition clarifications are fairly straightforward, a few items that would impact the overall RV storage policy require additional input and discussion from the Planning Commission prior to making a recommendation to the City Council. In the attached proposed RV zoning code amendment, the underlined text indicates new language, additions, or revisions. Outlined below are five items that require discussion. 1. Definitions The Zoning Code currently has a definition for "Recreational Vehicle," however the definition does not explicitly include special purpose trailers that may not be used to haul recreational vehicles (e.g. trailers to haul yard waste or other materials). In the past, special purpose trailers (SPT) were required to follow the recreational vehicle regulations; however, Staff suggests specifically including special purpose trailers with the RV regulations to avoid any future confusion. Staff also believes that the proposed definition is more inclusive of all recreational vehicles than the previous definition. The current ordinance does not address how RV length or height should be measured, though it does regulate length and height. It was found that most cities do not regulate the maximum height or length of R V s, though Arden Hills does. Staff is not recommending that the length or height restrictions be removed; however, Staff is proposing a specific method for measuring height and length. The proposed definitions are in conformance with the recent zoning code interpretation made in Planning Case 07-006 for the Hagen Conditional Use Permit to store a 34 foot RV outside. The RV, RV length, and RV height definitions are included in the proposed RV code. 2. RV Storage on Improved or Unimproved Surfaces The current code does not specifically state if RVs should be parked on an improved or unimproved surface. In the past, RVs have not been required to be parked on an improved surface. However, non-RVs vehicles are required to be parked on an improved surface even if they are parked in the yard. An improved surface could include concrete, pavements, pavers, and pre-existing gravel surfaces. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for October 3, 2007 \\Metro-inetlardenhillslPlanningIPlanning Cases\2007\07-025 RV Regulations Zoning Amendment\100307 - PC Report - Rv Regulations.doc Page 2 of 5 In order to clarify the regulation, Staff is proposing that RV s in the rear yard NOT be required to be placed on an improved surface, which is consistent with how the regulations have been enforced in the past. However, RV s parked for any amount of time in the front yard WOULD be required to be parked on an improved surface. As to side yards the ordinance as written would require that RVs parked in the side yard would only be required to be parked on an improved surface if they were visible from the street, as determined by the zoning administrator. This would give property owners the choice to screen the RV, park it in such a way as to limit visibility, or park it on an improved surface. This item is open for discussion. These provisions are included in the proposed RV code in 1325.10 Subd I.F. 3. Temporary Front Yard Storage In proposed Subd 2.A and 2.B, RVs can be temporarily stored in the front yard provided they meet certain setback requirements and are on an improved surface. This type of temporary storage is permitted in the existing code; however, the setback from the road and parking on an improved surface requirement were added to reduce the impact of temporary storage in the front yard and to keep RVs out ofthe public right-of-way. These provisions are included in the proposed RV code in 1325.10 Subd 2.A and 2.B. 4. Conditional Use Process or Variance Process Either option one or option two below must be selected prior to adopting the code. These options can still be adjusted prior to adopting the proposed R V code amendment if needed. Option 1: This option would eliminate the need for a conditional use permit for RVs of a certain length. Rather, this option sets a maximum size for an RV, and an RV is either in compliance or it is not. A home owner would have the opportunity to apply for a variance if the unique nature of their specific lot prohibited the use of or access to the side or rear yards of their property. However, the size of the RV is capped. Under the existing code, an RV greater than 28 feet but less than 34 feet in length can be stored outside with a conditional use permit. If option 1 is adopted, the maximum length for an RV could be set at 30 feet. The 30 foot limit is the starting point for the discussion; however, Staff was attempting to find the "middle ground" if the CUP option is eliminated. This option simplifies the language of the code and makes it clearer what is permitted and what is not. Of the fifteen communities surveyed, all use this process for dealing with R V s. Arden Hills is unique in granting CUPs for RV storage. With this option, the conditions of approval (i.e. storage location, screening,) could only be placed on RV s that were granted City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for October 3, 2007 \\Metro-inetlardenhillsIPlanning\Planning Cases\2007\07-025 RV Regulations Zoning AmendmentlJ00307 - PC Report - Rv Regulations.doc Page 3 ofS through the CUP process. With option one, a standard set of conditions would apply to all RVs. It is important to note that denying a CUP for RV storage is difficult because the City would have to be able to demonstrate that the RV is creating a negative impact on the surrounding neighborhood. If option one is adopted, any CUPs that have already been granted for outdoor RV storage (of which staff believes there is only one) would remain in effect. Option 2: The proposed zoning amendment offers more consistent language and clearer guidelines than the current code, but would largely remain the same. The conditional use permit process would remain and RVs would be regulated base on the existing tiered approach. RV s stored outside would continue to be permitted as long as they were 28 feet or less in size; however, a conditional use permit could be approved for RVs between 28 feet and 34 feet in size. RVs over 34 feet in length would be prohibited. These lengths can be changed if deemed necessary; however, that would require additional discussion. While the storage policy in option two is essentially the same as the existing code, it does include additional evaluation criteria for reviewing evaluating future conditional use permit requests. 5. Minimum R V Setbacks In both options one and two, the minimum side setbacks for RVs have been standardized to meet the principle structure setback of the property on which they are stored. In most cases this would be ten feet, but in some areas the side yard setback for homes is five feet, and RVs would be required to meet this. In all cases RVs would have a ten foot setback to the rear property line. This is in line with the setback for accessory structures. Depending on one's interpretation of the current code, RV s could be parked as close as five feet to the rear and side property lines if the RV is 28 feet or less in length. RVs between 28 feet and 34 feet in length were required to be at least ten feet from the side property line. The proposed changes make the setbacks the same regardless ofRV size. A new regulation in both options one and two is also being proposed: Any RV that is parked or stored outdoors shall not be placed closer to any principle building of an adjoining lot than to the principle building on the lot where it is parked or stored. This proposed regulation would require a person storing an RV to park the RV closer to their own home than the homes on the adjacent lots. This regulation will make it so a person could not park their RV 50 feet from their own home but only ten feet from the adjacent home. The impact of storing an RV should be primarily felt by the person storing the RV. These provisions are included in the proposed RV code. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for October 3, 2007 \\Metro-inetlardenhillslPlanninglPlanning Cases\2007\07-025 RV Regulations Zoning AmendmentlI00307 - PC Report - Rv Regulations.doc Page 4 of5 Options and Motion Lan!!ua!!e 1. Recommend Approval (with Commission Chanzes): Motion to recommend avvroval of Plamring Case 07-025 to amend the Recreational Vehicle Ordinance Section, 1325.10 of the Zoning Code, as presented in the October 3, 2007, plamring case report with option I or 2 (Other changes made during the discussion can be included in the code prior to making a motion). 2. Recommend Denial: Motion to recommend denial of Planning Case 07-025 to amend the Recreational Vehicle Ordinance as proposed in the October 3,2007, planning case report (recommending denial should include specific reasons). 3. Table: Motion to table Planning Case 07-025 to amend the Recreational Vehicle Ordinance as proposed in the October 3,2007, plamring case report for the following reasons... A change to the Zoning Code requires a public hearing before the Planning Commission and approval from 4/5 of the City Council. The Zoning Code change would go into effect upon publication in the official City newspaper. Notice Notice was published in the Shoreview-Arden Hills Bulletin. Staff has not received any letters, e-mails, or telephone calls from property owners or occupants in regard to this planning case. Deadline for A!!encv Actions There are no deadlines for action on this request. Attachments 3E-I Current R V Zoning Code 3E-2 Proposed RV Zoning Code Amendment Page 5 of 5 City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor October 3,2007 \\Metro-inetlardenhillslPlanninglPlanning Cases\2007\07-025 RV Regulations Zoning Amendment\l00307 - PC Report - Rv Regulations.doc Attachment 3 E-l ~ ~HILLS Current RV Zoning Code Ocotober 3, 2007, Planning Commission Meeting 1325.01 Recreational Vehicles (RV's). The restrictions set out in this section on the outdoor parking and storage of recreational vehicles is necessary for the peace, health, safety and welfare ofthe citizens of Arden Hills. Yet it is recognized that there are so many kinds of recreational vehicles and so many shapes and sizes of lots and land parcels within the City, that no matter what restrictions are placed upon their outdoor parking and storage, hardships will result to some owners ofrecreational vehicles and nuisances will result to some non-owners. Therefore in an attempt to avoid such hardships and nuisances, a system for regulating the storage of RV's is hereby established. Subd. 1 General Regulations for RV's in All Districts. A. Storage in an Enclosed Structure. RV's of any height or length may be kept within an enclosed structure which otherwise conforms to the zoning requirements of the district. B. Attachment to Ground Not Permitted. RV's shall be mobile and shall not be permanently affixed to the ground in a manner that would prevent removal. C. Use of RV. No RV shall be used for living, sleeping or housekeeping purposes in the City. D. RV Condition While Stored. No such equipment shall be stored or parked unless it is in condition for safe and effective performance and is currently licensed. E. Ownership. Permitted storage shall only be allowed for RV's owned by the owner or occupant of the property on which the RV is stored. Subd.2 General Regulations for the Exterior Storage ofRV's in Residential Districts. A. No more than three (3) RV's may be stored outside on a residential lot. No more than one of the 3 RV's may be either a self-propelled motor home or a travel trailer. B. Exterior storage of RV's less than seven (7) feet in height shall be permitted in the rear or side yard, with a minimum of five (5) feet from any property line, except when such yard is adj acent to a street where no RV storage is allowed. If both side and rear yards are available for parking or storage, then the location with the least visibility from streets and neighboring property, as determined by the Zoning Administrator, shall be used for such storage. E. RV's over seven (7) feet in height may be stored anywhere in the buildable portion of a residential lot. C. RV's less than twenty-eight (28) feet in length may be stored outside anywhere in the area where RV's less than seven (7) feet in height are allowed as in the above Section 1325.10 Subd 2.A.2. D. RV's less than thirty-four (34) feet in length may be allowed by conditional use permit in a rear or side yard, with a minimum side and rear yard setback of ten (10) feet, except when such a yard abuts a street, where no parking is allowed. This conditional use permit procedure will allow the unique circumstances of each lot to be considered and the most appropriate storage location determined. F. The owner or occupant of any shoreline lot is permitted to store up to three (3) boats or watercraft, in addition to other permitted RV's, provided that such boats or watercraft: 1. Do not exceed the size limitations for other RV's as regulated above. 2. Are stored in locations permitted for other RV's as regulated above, except that permitted boats or watercraft may also be stored in the required lakeshore setback area but not within fifty (50) feet of the water's edge. Lesser lakeshore setbacks are permitted when topographic conditions, lot configuration and/or the size and bulk of the watercraft do not allow the normal fifty (50) foot setback to be met. For purposes of this provision, this permitted lakeshore setback encroachment shall be treated as part of the buildable portion of the lot. Watercraft shall include, but, shall not be limited to, power boats, cruisers, canoes, jet skis, fishinglhunting boats, pontoon boats and sail boats. Subd. 3 Parking Permits. All R V's may be parked in driveways for the sole expressed purpose of loading and unloading for a period not to exceed seventy-two (72) hours. Permits for a period of up to seven (7) days, renewable once during a twelve (12) month period may be obtained from City Hall. Subd.4 Graphic Summary ofRV Storage Regulations. A. RV's of any length or height may be stored in enclosed structures, providing the structure conforms to Zoning Ordinance requirements. B. A maximum of three (3) RV's may be stored outside on a resi- dential lot. One of the three (3) RV's may be either a self- propelled motor home or a travel trailer. C. RV's less than twenty-eight (28) feet in length may be stored outside in the locations described below. A conditional use permit may be granted to allow storage of RV's up to a maximum length of thirty-four (34) feet. This conditional use permit procedure will allow the unique circumstances of each lot to be considered and the most appropriate storage location to be determined. D. RV's under seven (7) feet in height may be stored outside any- where in shaded area. E. RV's over seven (7) feet in height may be stored outside any- where in shaded area (the buildable portion of a lot). F. Winter Storage of Watercraft on Lakeshore Lots: LAKE FRONT YARD STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE Watercraft shall include, but shall not be limited to power boats, cruisers, canoes, jet skis, fishinglhunting boats, pontoon boats and sail boats. G. Up to three (3) boats are permitted to be stored on a shoreline lot in a residential district, in addition to other permitted RV storage. H. Watercraft less than seven (7) feet in height may be stored outside anywhere in the shaded area. The required setback from the shoreline shall be fifty (50) feet. However, lesser setbacks are permitted when restricted by lot configuration, topography or size and bulk of the water craft. 1. Watercraft over seven (7) feet in height may be stored anywhere in the shaded area. Attachment 3E-2 Proposed RV Zoning Code Amendment ~ ~HILLS Ocotober 3, 2007, Planning Commission Meeting Underlined words are new potential language or provisions. Definitions: Recreational Vehicles (RVs). Vehicles for recreational or utilitarian uses that can be driven. towed. or hauled. These vehicles mav be designed to be temporary living spaces for camp- ing/travel use. RVs shall include: Any watercraft. snowmobile. pull camper. all terrain vehicle CATV), motor home. travel trailer. tent trailer. special purpose trailer. utility trailer used for hauling. or other similar vehicle. A recreational vehicle upon a trailer shall constitute one recreational vehicle. RV Hei!!ht. The height of an RV shall be measured from the ground to the highest point of the structure not including antennas and utilitv/mechanical systems provided they are accessory to the RV and take UP no more than ten (10) percent ofthe roof surface area. RV Len!!th. The length of an RV shall be measured from end to end including any hitch or motor. For the purposes of measuring length. a recreational vehicle on a trailer will be measured as one vehicle. Water-oriented Recreational Vehicles. Boats and watercraft including, but not limited to, power boats, cruisers, canoes, jet skies, fishingihunting boatslpontoon boats, and sail boats. 1325.10 Recreational Vehicles (RVs): Subd. 1 General Regulations for RVs in All Districts. A. Storage in an Enclosed Structure. RV s of any height or length may be kept within an enclosed structure provided the structure conforms to the zoning requirements ofthe underlying district. B. Attachment to Ground Not Permitted. RVs shall be mobile and shall not be permanently affixed to the ground in a manner that would prevent removal. C. Use of RVs. No RV shall be used for temporary or permanent living, sleeping or housekeeping purposes while stored in the City. Nor may they be connected to sewer. water. or other utility at any time. D. Condition While Stored. All RVs shall be stored or parked in a secure, safe, orderly. and well-maintained condition that does not inhibit emergency vehicle access to any property. All RV s shall be currently licensed, operable, and drivable at all times. E. No RV shall be permitted on a vacant lot without a primary structure. F. Storage Surface. RVs stored in the side vard shall be kept on an improved hard surface if visible from the public right-of-wav, as determined by the Zoning Administrator. Subd. 2 Temporary RV Parkin!!. A. Temporarv Parkin!!. Currentlv licensed and operable RVs of any length or height are allowed to park in the driveway for no more than seventy-two (72) hours for the purpose of loading and unloading provided that thev are not within fifteen (15) feet ofthe curb and are not within five (5) feet of a side propertv line. B. Parking Permits. Administrative Permits may be obtained from City Hall that would permit a licensed and operable RV to park in the front yard for a period of up to seven (7) days, renewable once during a twelve (12) month period, provided that they are on an approved drivewav or other hard surface. are not within fifteen (15) feet of the curb. and are not within five (5) feet of a side propertv line. OPTION 1: SIGNIFICANT RV STORAGE POLICY CHANGE Subd. 3 Permitted RV Parkin!! and Stora!!e. Storin!! recreational vehicles outside of an enclosed buiIdin!! or structure is permitted in all residential districts provided that all of the foIlowin!! provisions are met: A. RVs are no more than thirty (30) feet in length and twelve (12) feet in height. B. No more than three (3) RVs may be stored outside on a residential lot. No more than one (1) of the three (3) RVs may be a self-propelled motor home, a travel trailer, camper, or other similar type ofRV. 2 C. RVs stored on a residential lot shall be owned or leased by the owner or tenant ofthe property on which the R V is stored. E. RV s shall not be placed within the principle structure side yard setback and shall be at least ten (10) feet from anv rear propertv lines. If both side and rear yards are available for 1;Jarking or storage, the location with the least visibility from the public street(s) and neighboring properties, as determined by the Zoning Administrator shall be used for storing the R V s. D. On any lot. RVs shall not be parked closer to the front property line than the principle structure or attached garage. Additionally, in the case of comer lots the RV shall not be parked or stored closer to the property line than the principle structure or attached garage in the side yard adi acent to the street. F. Any RV that is parked or stored outdoors shall not be placed closer to anv principle building of an adioining lot than to the principle building on the lot where it is parked or stored. OPTION 2: No SIGNIFICANT CHANGE TO STORAGE POLICY Subd.3 RVs shall be parked or stored in an enclosed !!ara!!e unless all of the followin!! requirements are met: A. The RVs are no more than twentv-eight (28) feet in length and seven (7) feet in height. B. No more than three (3) RVs may be stored outside on a residential lot. No more than one (1) of the three (3) RVs may be a self-propelled motor home, a travel trailer, camper, or other similar type ofRV. C. RVs stored on a residential lot shall be owned or leased by the owner or tenant of the property on which the RV is stored. D. On any lot. RV s shall not be parked closer to the front pro1;Jertv line than the principle structure or attached garage. Additionally, in the case of comer lots the RV shall not be parked or stored closer to the property line than the principle structure or attached garage in the side yard adiacent to the street. E. R V s shall not be placed within the princivle structure side vard setback and shall be at least ten (10) feet from any rear 1;Jroperty lines. If both side and rear yards are available for parking or storage. the location 3 with the least visibility from the public street(s) and neighboring properties. as determined by the Zoning Administrator shall be used for storing the RVs. F. Any RV that is parked or stored outdoors shall not be placed closer to any principle building of an adioining lot than to the principle building on the lot where it is parked or stored. G. Prohibited. Exterior storage ofRVs greater than 34 feet in length shall not be permitted in any residential zone. Subd. 4 A conditional use permit is required for the exterior storage of an RV in the following circumstances: A. The RV exceeds seven (7) feet in height. B. The RV is between twenty-eight (28) feet and thirty-four (34) feet in length. C. Lot size, lot dimensions, topographic features, and/or structure locations make it unfeasible to store an R V in the side or rear yard. D. Conditional Use Permit Evaluation Criteria. In addition to the Conditional Use Permit process and criteria in Section 1355.03 Subd. A of the Zoning Code, a Conditional Use Permit shall also meet the following criteria: a. A residential lot shall be limited to no more than one (1) Conditional Use Permit for an RV. b. The unique circumstances of each lot shall be considered to determine the most appropriate storage location. Where possible, the RV should be stored so as to reduce the visual impact of the RV. c. If the lot size, lot dimensions, topographic features, and/or structure locations make it unfeasible to store an R V in the side or rear yard, no more than one (1) RV of any type may be permitted forward ofthe principle structure. Under no circumstances shall the RV be stored closer than twenty (20) feet to the front property line. d. The City may require screening (fencing, trees, other vegetation, etc) to reduce the visual impact ofthe RV. e. The RVs shall be covered while being stored and the covering must be of a neutral or earth tone hue. The covering shall be kept clean and free of tears. f. No part ofthe RV shall be outside ofthe storage area specified in the Conditional Use Permit. g. Where possible, the RV shall be parked or stored in a location that is not closer to any principle building of an 4 adioining lot than to the principle building on the lot where it is parked or stored. Graphic Storage Location Summary. No part of the RV shall be outside of the permitted RV storage area described in the above section and displayed in the below graphics. R-2 40' 5 feet Side Yard * Principle Structure Side Yard Setback R-1 10 feet R-3 5 feet Front Yard 40' 40' Pmm>,rt\ll inFO! Curb~ Street Permitted RV Parking I Subd. 4/5 Shoreline Residential Lots. A. In addition to the provisions in Section 1325.10 Subd. 2, the owner or occupant of any shoreline lot is permitted to store three (3) additional water-oriented recreational vehicles outside of an enclosed structure. B. Water-oriented recreational vehicles stored outside on a residential lot shall be owned or leased by the owner or tenant of the property on which the boat or watercraft is stored. 5 C. RVs shall not be permitted within fiftv (50) feet of the Ordinary High Water (OHW) Mark on any property, with the exception of water- oriented recreational vehicles, which shall meet a ten (10) foot setback from the OHW mark. Graphic Storage Location Summary, No part of the RV shall be outside of the permitted RV storage area described in the above section and displayed in the below graphics. * Principle Structure Side Yard Setback R-1 10 feet R-2 5 feet R-3 5 feet Front Yard 40' Property Line Curb~ Street Permitted RV Parking Permitted Water-Oriented RV Parking 6 DATE: October 3, 2007 PC Agenda Item 3.F ~ ~HILLS MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: James Lehnhoff, City Plann~ SUBJECT: Planning Case #07-026 Zoning Code Amendment: Floor Area Definition City of Arden Hills 1245 West Highway 96 Requested Action Consider approving a Zoning Code text amendment to the definition ofjloor area. Back!!round In November 2006, the City re-codified the Zoning Code, which included a number minor and legally required updates. However, the Zoning Code is an evolving document that needs to be reviewed, updated, and clarified to ensure the spirit, intent, and goals of the Code are being met. As time allows, Staff will be proposing updates and changes the Zoning Code to make it clearer and more effective. Floor Area Ratio The floor area ratio (FAR) is one of the primary tools that are used to limit the bulk of a principle building on a property. The other tools include minimum landscaping requirements, impervious coverage limits, setback requirements, and building height limits. FAR manages the bulk of a structure by limiting how much total floor area can be constructed on a property. FAR regulations are different than lot coverage regulations because lot coverage looks at just the footprint of a structure on a property while FAR includes some or all of the floor area within a structure. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor October 3, 2007 \\Metro-inet.uslardenhillslPlanninglPlanning Cases\2007\07~026 Far Defn Zoning Amendment (Comp/ete)\100307 - PC Report -FAR Defn.doc Page 1 of 4 Every zone in Arden Hills has a maximum FAR, which generally ranges from .3 to .8. The limit varies considerably by city and the intent of a particular zone. To calculate FAR, the floor area of a building is divided by the total size ofthe property. For example, 2,500 square foot home 114,000 square foot property = .18 FAR If the City did not have a FAR limit, the potential maximum size of a home would be much larger under the current regulations. For example, the Zoning Code permits up to 25 percent of a residential lot to be covered with structures. If just 20 percent of a 14,000 square foot was covered with a building, that would be 2,800 square foot footprint. However, the Zoning Code permits the principle structure to be up to 35 feet tall, which could create a three story building. At three stories, the principle structure could include 8,400 square feet of space, which is a large structure for a 14,000 square foot lot and not in character with most of the residential properties in the City. Having setback, lot coverage, height, and FAR regulations allows for a great deal of flexibility in structure design on a residential lot. The various regulations complement each other; however, it is important to have clearly defined regulations. Floor Area Definition While the intent of the floor area ratio regulation is fairly straightforward and the calculation itself is not complicated, applying the regulation in Arden Hills is cumbersome because of the Zoning Code's definition for what is included in floor area. Section 1305.04 of the Zoning Code currently uses the following definitions: Subd. 67 Floor area. The sum of the gross horizontal area of the several floors of a building that is measured from the exterior walls, including habitable basement areas and attached accessory buildings. Areas excluded are non-habitable cellars, garages, porches, decks, attics, stairways and storage, utility and heating rooms. It is unclear what an "attached accessory building" is; the excluded floor areas within the principle structure can add considerable bulk to a structure; there is not a definition of "habitable basement;" and the excluded floor areas can be difficult to calculate. Furthermore, as houses have gotten bigger, developers have been getting more creative in labeling rooms to make it so the FAR does not apply to a portion of a new dwelling. This regulation becomes particularly difficult to enforce when a structure is close to the FAR limit. Although a certain amount of interpretive leeway is needed, the floor area definition is unnecessarily vague. Staff is proposing to clarify this definition to makes it easy to understand for residents and easier to calculate and apply. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor October 3, 2007 \lMetro-inet.us\ardenhil/s\Planning\Planning Cases\2007\07-026 Far Defn Zoning Amendment (Complete)\l00307 - PC Report - FAR Defn.doc Page 2 of 4 After reviewing a number of other floor area definitions from other cities and consulting with the other members of the Community development Department Staff, Staff is proposing the following revised floor area definition to begin the discussion: Subd. 67 Floor area. The sum of the gross horizontal area of all floors of a building as measured in square feet from the exterior sides of the exterior walls, or from the centerline of party walls separating attached buildings, but not including covered porches that meet the requirements in Section 1325.03 Subd 2.D; decks; any space where the average f1oor-to-ceiling height is less than six feet; attached or detached garages; and other detached accessory structures. Although attached garages certainly add bulk to a dwelling, the current definition used by Arden Hills specifically excluded garages, and the floor area definition used by most other cities exclude garages. Including garages in the floor area calculation would be a distinct policy change and would warrant a review of the current floor area ratio limit because including the garage space would reduce the potential living space permitted on a property. The excluded porches would include those that meet the requirements of the City's covered front porch ordinance, which are not enclosed. An enclosed porch would be included in the FAR calculation. If the Planning Commission determines that a change to the FAR policy should be pursued (e.g. including garages), this proposed zoning code amendment can be tabled. However, Staff is concerned with getting a clear and understandable definition in place so that building proposals can be fairly reviewed. ClarifYing this floor area definition is the first step in limiting the amount of floor area permitted on a property, which has become a common concern in the growing "McMansion" debate. The floor area definition and the overall FAR policy can still be revisited and revised in the future if needed. Options 1. Recommend Approval as Proposed: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 07- 026 to amend the definition for floor area in Section 1305.04 Subd 67 ofthe Zoning Code as presented in the October 3, 2007, planning case report. 2. Recommend Approval with Changes: Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 07- 026 to amend the definition for floor area in Section 1305.04 Subd 67 ofthe Zoning Code with the following changes... 3. Recommend Denial: Motion to recommend denial of Planning Case 07-026 to amend the definition for floor area in Section 1305.04 Subd 67 of the Zoning Code as presented in the October 3, 2007, planning case report. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor October 3, 2007 \\Metro-inet.uslardenhillslP/anninglPlanning Cases\2007\07-026 Far Defn Zoning Amendment (Comp/ete)\100307 - PC Report - FAR Defn.doc Page 3 of 4 4. Table: Motion to table Planning Case 07-026 to amend the definition for floor area in Section 1305.04 Subd 67 of the Zoning Code: a specific reason and/or information request should be included with a motion to table. A change to the Zoning Code requires a public hearing before the Planning Commission and approval from 4/5 of the City Council. The Zoning Code change would go into effect upon publication in the official City newspaper. Notice Notice was published in the Shoreview-Arden Hills Bulletin. Staff has not received any letters, e-mails, or telephone calls from property owners or occupants in regard to this planning case. Resident Comment The City has not received any comments regarding this application. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor October 3, 2007 IlMetro-inet.uslardenhi/lslPlanninglPlanning Cases\2007\07-026 Far Defn Zoning Amendment (Complete)\100307 - PC Report - FAR Defn.doc Page 4 of 4 Floor Area Definitions from Other Municipalities RoseviIIe: FLOOR AREA, GROSS: (For the purpose of determining the floor area ratio conversions of existing structures and maximum size of business establishments.) The sum ofthe gross horizontal area of the various floors of a building measured in square feet from exterior wall to exterior wall. Unoccupied basements and space devoted to off-street parking shall not be included. (Ord. 1286, 08-04-2003) Shoreview: Floor Area, Gross (GFA). The sum of the gross horizontal areas of the several floors ofa building (including cellars and basements) measured from the exterior face of exterior walls, or from the centerline of a wall separating two buildings, but not including interior parking spaces, loading space for motor vehicles, or any space where the floor- to-ceiling height is less than six feet. Mounds View Subd. 46. FLOOR AREA, GROSS: A figure used to determine the floor area ratio, conversion of existing structures and maximum size of business establishments. The sum of the gross horizontal area of the various floors of a building, measured in square feet, and from the exterior wall in each case; cellars and space devoted to off-street parking shall not be included. New Brighton: (30) Floor Area, Gross. A. The sum ofthe gross horizontal areas of the several floors of all buildings on the lot as measured from the exterior faces of exterior walls or from the center line of walls separating two buildings. B. In particular, the gross floor area of a building or buildings shall include basements and stair wells at each story; floor space used for mechanical equipment with structural headroom of seven feet, six inches or more; attic space providing structural headroom of seven feet, six inches or more; and, interior balconies and mezzanines but shall exclude all cellar and basement space devoted to parking of automobiles. Vadnais Heights: Floor Area. The floor area of a building or buildings shall be the sum of the gross horizontal areas of the several floors of such building or buildings exclusive of cellars or basements, measured from the exterior faces of exterior walls or from the centerline of party walls separating two buildings. Falcon Heights: Floor area means a gross area of the main floor of a residential building measured in square feet and not including an attached garage, breezeway, or similar attachment. Floor area gross means the sum of the gross area of the various floors of a building measured in square feet. The basement floor area shall not be included unless such area constitutes a story. Saint Anthony: Subd. 31. Floor Area Ratio. The ratio of the maximum permitted floor area of the principal building or buildings to the area of the lot on which they are located or to be located. The maximum allowable floor area on a lot is determined by multiplying the lot area by the floor area ratio. The garage is not included in determining the floor area ratio as it is considered an accessory building in residential areas. Subd. 30. Floor Area. The sum of the gross areas of all floors in a structure except the basement floor, measured from the exterior faces of the exterior walls. Lino Lakes: Floor Area, Net. The total of all floor areas of a building, excluding stairwells and elevator shafts, equipment rooms, interior vehicular parking or loading; and all floors below the first or ground floor, except when used or intended to be used for human habitation or service to the public. City of Minneapolis Floor area, gross (GF A). The gross floor area of a building is the sum ofthe gross horizontal areas of the several floors of the building measured from the exterior faces ofthe exterior walls, or from the centerline of walls separating two (2) buildings. The gross floor area of a building shall include basement floor area when one-half ( 1/2) or more ofthe basement height is above the established curb level or above the finished lot grade level where the curb level has not been established. The gross floor area shall also include elevator shafts and stairwells to each floor, penthouses, attic space having headroom of seven (7) feet six (6) inches or more, interior balconies and mezzanines, enclosed porches, floor area devoted to accessory uses, and floor space used for mechanical equipment, except equipment located on the roof. The gross floor area of structures devoted to bulk storage of materials, including but not limited to grain elevators and petroleum storage tanks, shall be determined on the basis of height in feet, assuming one (1) floor for each fourteen (14) feet in height. Gross floor area shall not include space devoted to accessory off-street parking or loading facilities, including aisles, ramps and maneuvering space. Floor area ratio. The floor area ratio of the building or buildings on any zoning lot is the gross floor area of the building or buildings on that zoning lot divided by the area of such zoning lot. ~ ~HILLS MEMORANDUM DATE: October 3,2007 PC Agenda Item 3. G TO: Planning Commission FROM: James Lehnhoff, CitYPlanner)f SUBJECT: Planning Case #07-027 Zoning Code Amendment B-2: General Business District - Proposed Design Standards City of Arden Hills ATTACHMENTS: 3G-l Map of the B-2: General Business District 3G-2 Draft B-2 Design Standards Requested Action Consider approving design standards for the B-2: General Business District. Back!!round With recent development pressure and redevelopment proposals in the B-2 Zone, the City Council directed Staff to draft basic design standards for the B-2 Zone. The B-2 Zone includes those commercial properties that are adjacent to County Road E, Connelly Street, and Pine Tree Drive between Lexington Avenue and Highway 51 (Attachment 3G-l). The County Road E corridor in Arden Hills has long been considered the downtown area of the City. Despite its clear importance to residents and businesses, it happens to be the only commercial zone that does not have any design standards except for the typical setback, building height, and lot coverage regulations. There are currently not any guidelines for building materials, window requirements, pedestrian connections, or other design considerations despite its highly visible and visited location. While the City does not want to discourage property owners from upgrading their properties or buildings, there is a definite public interest in ensuring that redevelopment uses high quality building materials, provides pedestrian connections, promotes a positive business atmosphere, and minimizes potential negative impacts. New City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor October 3, 2007 \\Metro-inet.uslardenhillslPlanningIP/anning Cases\2007\07-027 B2 Zoning Code Amendments (Complete)\09J007 - PC Report - B2 Zoning Amendment.doc Page 1 of4 development and redevelopment should be complimentary to the existing buildings; however, the City also wants to advance the visual and functional appeal of the zone. The proposed standards are meant to start the discussion on what residents and businesses want in the B-2 District. These standards are an interim step to creating a more unified, long-term redevelopment plan for the B-2 Zone that may include more detailed design requirements in the future. These standards are not meant to completely guide where redevelopment should occur, exactly how it should look, make significant changes to the permitted or conditional uses in the zone, or inhibit redevelopment in the B-2 Zone. Instead, the proposed standards create basic expectations for redevelopment and give the City significantly more discretion during the review process to help ensure new construction and redevelopment advances the purpose of the B-2 Zone. Since the City's planning resources are currently focused on the Comprehensive Plan update, regular plauning cases, and other zoning amendments, the proposed design standards will provide the City with a basis from which to work until a small area plan for the B-2 Zone can be developed. A small area plan is more detailed than a full comprehensive plan and it focuses on a particular area. The small area plan can provide a significant amount of guidance on how the B- 2 Zone should or should not be redeveloped, which in turn can be incorporated into the Zoning Code. Creating a detailed small area plan will require significant input from residents and the businesses in the community. The Comprehensive Plan can help set the stage for a more detailed small area plan in the B-2 Zone. B-2: General Business District As the design standards are developed, the purpose of the B-2 Zone should guide the design standards to ensure that they are advancing the overall purpose ofthe B-2 zone. Section 1320.04 Subd. 7 states the existing purpose of the B-2 zone: A To group compatible retail and service business uses which will tend to draw trade that is naturally interchangeable and so promote business prosperity. B To provide an adequate supply of businesses and professional service areas to meet the needs of the residents. C To promote a high quality of total commercial development and design that produces a positive visual image. D To minimize the effects of traffic congestion, noise, odor, glare and similar safety problems. The proposed design standards in Attachment 3G-2 are modeled after existing standards in the B-3, B-4, I-Flex, and GB Zones along with a few other ideas from other cities. The draft is a starting point. Questions, comments, other ideas, and changes are welcome. The design standards are attempting to balance the need for some design control and individual property creativity as well as advance the purpose of the B-2 Zone. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for October 3. 2007 \\Metro-inet.us\ardenhillsIPlanning\P/anning Cases\2007\07-027 B2 Zoning Code Amendments (Complete) \091007 - PC Report - B2 Zoning Amendment.doc Page 2 of 4 While adopting design standards will help provide additional review discretion to the City, we should be clear in what type of redevelopment or changes should require Planning Commission and City Council review. Adopting a code that requires a lengthy and resource-intensive review process for every minor change would be cumbersome and may stifle even small upgrades. For example, adding a window, painting a door, or upgrading the fayade of a building in a way that would be in compliance with the proposed design standards should probably not require a full Planning Commission and City Council review. The proposed design standards are directed at those changes that have a significant visual impact or functional impact. Section 1320.09 Subd I.Al-7 describes the types of changes that would require full City review. Additional Review The proposed design regulations were sent to the EDC for their review; however, no comments were received in time for the release of this report. Recommendation Staff is recommending approval of the proposed design standards for the B-2: General Business District. Options 1. Recommend Approval (with changes): Motion to recommend approval of Planning Case 07- 027 to adopt design standards for the B-2 Zone in Section 1320 of the Zoning Code as proposed in the September 5, 2007, planning case report (amendments to the proposed code change can be added during the discussion). 2. Recommend Denial: Motion to recommend denial of Planning Case 07-027 to adopt desigu standards for the B-2 Zone in Section 1320 of the Zoning Code as proposed in the September 5,2007, planning case report. 3. Table: Motion to table Planning Case 07-027 for Zoning Code text amendments to the B-2 Zone: a specific reason and/or information request should be included with a motion to table. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for October 3, 2007 IlMetro-inet.uslardenhillslP/anninglPlanning Cases\2007\07.027 B2 Zoning Code Amendments (Complete)\09/007 - PC Report - B2 Zoning Amendment.doc Page 3 of4 Notice Proper notice was published in the Shoreview-Arden Hills Bulletin and sent to all properties in the B-2 zone. Staff has received two phone calls with questions about the design regulations from property owners in the B-2 Zone; however, they did not voice any objections to the proposal. This meeting has been scheduled for a public hearing, which must occur before any zoning amendments can be recommended to the Council for approval. Resident Comment The City has not received any comments regarding this application. Attachments 3G-l Map of the B-2: General Business District 3G-2 Draft B-2 Design Standards City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor October 3, 2007 IIMetro-inet.us\ardenhillslPlanninglPlanning Cases\2007\07-027 B2 Zoning Code Amendments (Complete)\091007 - PC Report- B2 Zoning Amendment.doc Page 4 of 4 Attachment 3 G-l Map of the B-2: General Business District ~ ~HILLS October 3,2007, Planning Commission Meeting :;;: ~ ~ !j n~ l~~]f ~j!iq UhUUiiH lill~~ ~'\"'<.llIJID .. 'C ~ " .2 o " " .g ~ o o N '2 '" ~ ~ o o _ .~ ~.~ E"~] tS ..".- .S ~ ~ "'"",,, -0,0 8 e-~ !:l (,).- .....dE o e Cll s::<2 E .g e g . " " :-;::<S.... S'-c<S: o~(-. "00 :.z~ '~g2 El~ e ","dB :alii" F l:f~ tti~.s .0. 0",,,, ~:.@ ]~8 ~ " ~ ".s .coo 00" .;] E {joo .~-o ~~~ .~ ~] oo~ 0000 .- " "'" Iii;g S "-00 "liiU ~"'.s 00 8 lIIIEb go~ Ao]'<t . " " 8-0 " "d..e:l-S "", " "Eg.... 8~ Cll e!:lr.r "000 ::a~e ~3~ .0" ~ o~ IS .s.il'. "ijv,:3 :;; ~ Cll ._gF' ~~ 80~ "',_0 .- 0 F:]N ~g~ ~51l _.8 "'''''' .., U '" is 00 8 OJ on "' ~ '" City of Arden Hills Chapter 13 Zoning Code 1320.05 Land Use Chart. ;Vo flC/f'OFed c.- A all J €..-?; Section 1320 - District Provisions Adopted: November 13, 2006 Page 9 of37 Attachment 3 G- 2 ~ ~HlLLS Draft B-2 Design Standards October 3,2007, Planning Commission Meeting EXISTING PURPOSE OF THE B-2 DISTRICT: 1320.04 Purpose of Districts. Subd. 7 B-2 General Business District A. To group compatible retail and service business uses which will tend to draw trade that is naturally interchangeable and so promote business prosperity. B. To provide an adequate supply of businesses and professional service areas to meet the needs of the residents. C. To promote a high quality of total commercial development and design that produces a positive visual image. D. To minimize the effects of traffic congestion, noise, odor, glare and similar safety problems NEW SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE B-2 DISTRICT: 1320.09 Special Requirements for the B-2 General Business District. The B-2 General Business District encompasses the primary commercial gateway into the City. Accomplishing the purpose of the B-2 District requires particular concern for the design of buildings, site features (such as landscaping, lighting, and signage), site layout, building materials, and site design. The traffic and visual impacts from new developments and redevelopments must be evaluated to help ensure the long-term viability and success ofthe B-2 General Business District. Subd. 1 Procedure. The following procedures shall apply to all new construction, modification of a building(s), and modification of a property within the B-2 District: A. The application and the administrative and review procedure established in Section 1355.04 Subd 3 and Subd 5, Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review, and in Appendix A, Procedural Manual, shall be followed for all development(s) that: 1. Involves new building construction or alterations that increase the capacity or square footage ofthe building; 2. Modifies a building's exterior but does not conform to the provisions in this Section as determined by the Zoning Administrator; 3. Modifies the site or use in such a way that notably increase traffic and/or alters traffic patterns as determined by the Zoning Administrator and engineer designated by the City; 4. Reduces parking spaces below the minimum requirement for the uses on the property; 5. Adds more than ten (10) parking spaces; 6. Reduces the net landscaped area; 7. Installs additional lighting poles or lighting sources (but not replacement of existing lighting fixtures); B. Modifications to building or properties not listed in above one through seven shall not require a conditional use permit or site plan review unless the change is deemed significant by the Zoning Administrator or Building Official. C. The prescribed procedures or standards in this Section may be modified by the City Council to allow planning flexibility and to encourage cooperative dialogue between the applicant and the City. Subd.2 Permitted uses (as specified in the Land Use Chart, Section 1320.05, for the B-2 District) that occupy existing buildings do not require a conditional use permit unless the criteria listed in Section 1320.01 Subd 9.A.1-7 are triggered. Subd.3 Conditional uses (as specified in the Land Use Chart, Section 1320.05, for the B-2 District) require an approved conditional use permit prior to occupancy. Modifying a building or site as listed in Section 1320.09 Subd 1.A.1-7 shall also require a conditional use permit and site plan review. Subd. 4 Planned Unit Developments. To further accomplish the stated purpose of the B-2 District, developers are encouraged to plan their sites in the spirit of the purpose and intent of the Planned Unit Development provision in Section 1320.14. If a Planned Unit Development application is submitted, the Planned Unit Development proposal shall identify modifications to the standard zoning requirements otherwise applicable to the site and the reasons why the modifications would be in the public interest and would be consistent with the purpose of the B-2 District. Subd. 5 Design Guidelines. New construction and redevelopment of properties shall adhere to the following design requirements. A. Building Exteriors, Site Features, and Site Development. (i) The arrangement, geometry, massing, materials and colors shall work to create a high quality development that is responsive to existing buildings, site features, and site design on adjoining sites in the district. (ii) Exterior building materials shall be primarily of brick, stone, glass or any combination thereof, except trim and accessories may be metal or wood. EIFS shall not exceed ten percent of the exterior of a building. (iii)Sheet metal, corrugated metal, and plain flat concrete block (painted or not) shall not be permitted as exterior finishes. (iv)Design elements on all sides of a building shall be compatible with the front elevation and/or adjacent buildings. Architectural elements such as, but not limited to, windows, shutters, awnings, doors, masonry exterior veneers, cornice detailing, window casings, and other architectural details should demonstrate consistency on all sides of the structure that are 2 reasonably visible to the general public. Plain flat walls shall not be permitted when viewable from the public right-of-way or public areas. (v) Buildings containing office and retail uses shall maintain twenty percent (20%) minimum window coverage on each floor that faces a street or public open space. Mirror glass/fayade glazing shall not constitute more than fifty percent (50%) of the required window area. (vi)The City Council will make the final determination on the compatibility and consistency with these design provisions. B. Fences. (i) No barbed wire, razor wire, or spikes allowed. (ii) Fences must blend into the landscape and minimize corrosion. Wood, brick, stone or wrought iron is encouraged. If chain link is allowed by the City Council, it must have black or dark green vinyl coating. (iii)A11 other requirements of Section 1325.05 Subd 4 must be followed. C. Screening. (i) All mechanical equipment, whether roof-mounted or ground-mounted, shall be completely screened from view of adjacent properties and public streets, or designed to be compatible with the architectural treatment ofthe principal building. Wood screening shall not be permitted. (ii) Trash and recycling equipment and materials shall be screened from public view and adjacent properties with an enclosure that is constructed of the same materials and colors as the principle building. Wood fencing shall not be permitted. (iii)Loading docks shall be screened from public view or integrated into the building's architecture so as to reduce their visual impact. Subd. 6 Lighting. Exterior lighting shall be provided for the safety and convenience of occupants and visitors. A. A lighting plan shall be submitted that shows location, type of illumination and design. B. Exterior lighting shall be consistent in type, design, and scale to create unity in the B-2 District. C. The source of illumination shall be hooded, concealed or controlled in a manner so as not to unnecessary glare on adjoining lots, buildings, streets or highways. D. Light washing of buildings is prohibited. Wall packs are allowed at entrances only. Accent lighting of buildings and sites may be permitted by the City through the review process. A photometric analysis of site and building shall be submitted for City approval with all new construction or redevelopment proj ects. Subd. 7 Pedestrian Circulation. All new development and redevelopment within the District shall install pedestrian improvements in accordance with the City of Arden Hills Comprehensive Plan and any other supplementary sidewalk or trail plans. Other pedestrian sidewalks and trails may be required by the City. 3 A. Site design shall facilitate pedestrian connections and mobility within and between building, sites, and uses by providing clear visual indicators through door placement, signage, and integrating landscaping components. B. The city may require bike racks; racks must be placed to not impede pedestrian circulation. C. Internal sidewalk systems shall connect with adjacent planned or developed public sidewalks or trails. Subd.8 Drainage /Water Management Plan: A plan must be submitted with each project or lot development in the B-2 District. The plan must be approved by the Rice Creek Watershed District, other agencies as required, and the engineer assigned by the City. Two or more lots or projects may coordinate their plans for their mutual benefit. Subd. 9 Prohibited Uses. Some land uses are not compatible with the stated purpose of the B-2 District. The following uses are therefore prohibited: A. Open sales, rental or storage lots, including but not limited to cars, buses, trucks, motorcycles, bicycles, recreational vehicles, trailers, boats, mobile homes, machinery, lumber, building materials, and similar items. B. Mini-storage facilities. C. Outdoor bulk storage buildings, including but not limited to, forest, metal, concrete, agricultural and petroleum products, chemicals and similar products. D. Manufacturing or processing that generates hazardous waste without a valid Hazardous Waste Generator's license from the Ramsey County Public Health Department. 4 MEMORANDUM DATE: October 3, 2007 PC Agenda Item 4.A TO: Planning Commission Meagan Beekman, Planner I~ FROM: SUBJECT: Tree Preservation Ordinance City of Arden Hills ATTACHMENTS: 4A-I 4A-2 4A-3 Current City of Arden Hills Landscape Plan Requirements Current City of Woodbury Protection of Woodlands Requirements Current City of Forest Lake Woodland Preservation Regulations Requested Action Please review the tree preservation information contained herein. The Planning Commission is being asked to discuss what the goals of an amended tree preservation ordinance should be as well as any impacts of an amended code on both the environment and property owners. Staff is requesting further direction on determining the scope of a new tree preservation ordinance. Back!!round Staff has been directed by the Planning Commission and City Council to examine the current zoning code regarding tree preservation. Staff was asked to work on an improved ordinance that would better handle redevelopment and subdivisions within the city. In response to this request, staff has examined a number of tree preservation ordinances throughout the metropolitan area. In addition, local and national sources have been consulted that offer potential best practices on developing a tree preservation ordinance. As a result of this initial research, it has become clear that there is no single way to initiate a tree preservation ordinance, and the scope, goals, and methods of achieving tree preservation goals vary greatly from community to community. Since there are so many tree preservation regulation methods, the goals of a new ordinance must be firmly defined so that the purpose of the regulations is clear. Staff requests direction on what City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor October 3,2007 \lMetro-inet.us\ardenhillsIPlanninglPlanning Cases\2007\07~OXX ~ Tree Preservation Ordinancell00307 -PC Report - Tree Preservation Inquiry2.doc Page 1 of6 the priorities of the city should be regarding tree preservation in order to determine what, if any, incentives should be built into the new ordinance Once the goals and priorities ofthe tree preservation ordinance are set, Staff will prepare additional information and optional code language for review. Staff will also consult with the Parks, Trails, and Recreation Committee to gather their input. Due to the complexity of preparing tree preservation regulations, this process will likely take more than one meeting and will be an iterative process. Tree Preservation The potential impact of a tree preservation ordinance is great. It can be written to regulate only the most extreme and largest redevelopments within the city, but it also has the potential to shape every redevelopment within the city. The benefits of a well written tree preservation ordinance can also be great. It has the potential to preserve open space, protect woodland areas, encourage responsible land redevelopment, and protect the beauty of the natural landscape of a community. However, a poorly written or misguided tree preservation ordinance can be cumbersome, difficult to enforce, and unintentionally overwhelming for even small proj ects. If not crafted to meet the goals of the City, the tree preservation could increase the complexity of many proj ects without producing a clear and beneficial outcome. The ordinance can also add cost to projects for the City review and for property owners. The following discussion should address both the economic and physical constraints of construction on wooded lots as well as the benefits of established trees in our community. Goals Determining the goals and scope is an important part of developing this ordinance. It will flavor the outcome of the regulations. For example, ifthe goal is tree preservation over tree replacement, then an outcome might be a regulation that requires new development to impact as few trees as possible during planning and construction. However, this regulation can affect the location, size, scope, and economics of a project. The city might put in place incentives to encourage tree preservation and help with the cost of development, such as height bonuses and setback reductions for significant trees saved, or reduced landscaping requirements in return for preserved trees. These are potential goals of a tree preservation or replacement ordinance. This list is far from exhaustive and the goals are not mutually exclusive; however, this is meant to be a starting point for further discussion. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for October 3, 2007 \\Metro-inet.us\ardenhills\PlanninglPlanning Cases\2007\07-0XX - Tree Preservation Ordinance\100307 - PC Report - Tree Preservation Inquiry2.doc Page 2 of6 . Reducing tree loss during redevelopment . Reducing damage to standing trees during construction . Providing replacement of trees lost during construction . Providing for planting trees where none occurred previously . Providing for maintenance of preserved trees after construction is complete . Reducing tree loss with new plats and minor subdivisions The above goals could apply to residential properties, commercial/industrial properties, or both. As discussed in the scope section of this report, it would be helpful to determine if one or both types of properties should be included. Scope The scope of the ordinance, and the policies that will accompany it, will set the tone and determine how much regulation a local authority desires to assert over the protection and/or preservation of its forest resource. The scope ofthis tree preservation ordinance is likely to include any new building projects submitted after the date of adoption of the ordinance. It could include commercial, industrial, and large-scale residential developments that include new buildings. A tree survey will be required with the submitted plans that will identify the significant trees on the site, their sizes and species. Many tree preservation ordinances also affect other types of projects: . single and two-family lots, . parking lot expansions beyond a certain percent, . building additions, . a large amount of on-site grading above a certain percent, . building footprint expansions, . or any other project that increases the impervious surface of a lot above a certain percent. In addition to identifying which properties will be affected by the tree preservation ordinance, this code must also indicate the level of regulation to be undertaken, the extent to which lost trees must be mitigated or replaced, and penalties for not complying with the regulations. Tree preservation ordinances can be developed to coincide with current zoning or property subdivision regulations in the form oflandscape requirements. They can be very simple or complex in their scope. For example, a simple ordinance may stipulate that the cutting of any tree larger than a certain diameter can be done only by permit and must be within a designated construction area. A complex ordinance, on the other hand, may include formulas to determine percentage of tree loss and the mitigation ofthe trees lost during construction with a specified number of newly planted trees. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meeting for October 3, 2007 \lMetro-inet.us\ardenhillsIPlanninglPlanning Cases\2007\07-0XX - Tree Preservation OrdinanceIJ00307 - PC Report - Tree Preservation Inquiry2.doc Page 3 of6 Requirements Tree Survey The first step in regulating tree preservation and replacement is knowing what trees are present and what percentage are being impacted by a project. Every community that has a tree preservation ordinance also requires that submitted plans include a tree survey. This is essential in determining if the project will fall under the purview of the tree preservation and replacement regulations. For family and two-family redevelopment projects this survey could be in the form of an informal sketch on an aerial photograph or drawing, or it could require a certified survey of trees from a licensed forester. In general a tree survey would include only the significant trees on the lot and any large clumps of insignificant trees. It would also need to include an identification of the type and size of any significant trees on the lot. Preservation The heart of the ordinance should be the preservation of trees. There are many variations to the intent of tree preservation, but the bottom line becomes what you want to preserve. This often becomes an issue of just how many trees make up a woodland. Some ordinances will list a percentage of trees lost versus the total trees remaining in the form of a tolerance barometer. For example, if more than 10 percent of the trees are removed by a development, then the preservation ordinance would be triggered, and a tree survey and preservation/replacement plan would have to be submitted for approval. Another approach is to specify that the forest left following development will be similar to the one existing before the project was completed, i.e., if 15 percent of the trees on the site were larger than 24 inches, then trees this size should make up 15 percent ofthe trees remaining after construction. The intent of this provision is to have a woodland of similar size distribution after development, thereby preserving the character of the woods. Replacement Tree replacement is a simple concept, but to be equitable it can become a very complex procedure. For example, an ordinance may require that the loss of a 30-inch diameter tree must be replaced with the planting of fifteen two-inch diameter trees. However, it can be difficult and sometimes impossible to fmd enough suitable planting locations for the replacement trees. This particular approach can fail to mitigate the environmental effect of mature tree loss. Other ordinances require that percentages of specific sizes and species of trees must be replaced based on what was there before the development occurred. A variety of replacement strategies are possible including: . requiring developers to set aside wooded areas as preserves; City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor October 3, 2007 \\Metro-inet.uslardenhillslPlanninglPlanning Cases\2007\07-0XX - Tree Preservation Ordinance\100307 - PC Report - Tree Preservation Inquiry2.doc Page 4 of6 . sliding scales that require greater replacement of caliper inches as the size of the impacted tree increases; . percentage replacement which requires that a certain percentage of each parcel be wooded, typically this is designated by zoning district; . flexible no-net loss formulas that require developers to replace 100 percent of the caliper inches lost, either on site or off site. Each approach has its advantages and disadvantages-none is perfect. When replacement of trees is included in an ordinance, the questions, "why, how much, and where?" need to be primary considerations. Incentives Developing an ordinance which creates incentives is a positive way to achieve compliance. Many incentives exist to encourage tree preservation. The priorities set by the City Council will dictate how much incentive will be written into the code to encourage the type of development that is most desirable. If the goal is to create a policy of preservation, then the intent of a tree preservation ordinance should be to provide incentives for unique and creative project designs that complement the woodlands and replace excessive tree loss. Such incentives could include: . Setback reductions for trees saved . Height or density transfers for trees saved . Unit bonuses for land dedicated for replanting, or trees saved . Preserved trees credited to the landscaping that would typically be required for the project . A protected woodlot could be dedicated to the city in lieu of park dedication requirements . Parking requirements reduced for trees saved . Additional trees planted or preserved can offset park dedication fees Options It is not necessary to make a motion or come to an agreement on the exact content of a tree preservation ordinance at this time. Staff is only requesting guidance. Notice This is not a public hearing and as such no public notices were sent out. City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor October 3, 2007 \\Metro-inet.uslardenhillslPlanning\Planning Cases\2007107-0XX - Tree Preservation Ordinance\/00307 - PC Report - Tree Preservation Inquiry2.doc Page 5 of6 Deadline for A!!encv Actions There are no deadlines for action on this request. Attachments 4A -I Current City of Arden Hills Landscape Plan Requirements 4A-2 Current City of Woodbury Protection of Woodlands Requirements 4A-3 Current City of Forest Lake Woodland Preservation Regulations http://www.nmstac.orglRFC/preservationordguide.htm City of Arden Hills Planning Commission Meetingfor October 3,2007 \\Metro~inet.us\ardenhills\Planning\Planning Cases\2007\07vOXX ~ Tree Preservation Ordinance\100307 - PC Report - Tree Preservation Inquiry2.doc Page 6 of 6 Attachment 4A -1 Current Arden Hills landscape Plan Requirements Ocotober 3, 2007, Planning Commission Meeting LANDSCAPE PLAN A. CITY REVIEW PROCEDURE In the submission requirements for some development proposals (such as Site Plan Review, Special Use Permit and Planned Unit Development) the following landscape requirements shall be followed in addition to the submission requirements for "Landscape Plan" as defined in each type of application. B. DESIGN REOUIREMENTS 1. The extent of landscape and selection of plant and landscape materials shall be appropriate to the scale and nature of the building(s) site. 2. On complex sites, the natural existing vegetation, earth forms, wetlands and steep slopes shall be carefully evaluated, protected and enhanced as appropriate. 3. Landscape berms and buffers will be used to screen and visually separate: business sites from residential uses; business sites from public streets; and one site from another. 5. Minimum planted tree sizes shall be 3" caliper for overstory deciduous trees, 2 inch caliper for ornamental trees and 8 foot height for coniferous trees. Upright shrubs shall be 18" high for small mature plant size, 24" high for medium mature plant size, and 30" high for tall mature plant size. Spreading shrubs shall have a minimum horizontal dimension of 24". The required height of evergreens used for required screening may be increased by the City. 5. Minimum landscaping requirements shall relate to the gross square footage of all floors of a building and the building height and shall be expressed as the minimum number of total inches required per building site. a. Minimum total caliper inches = Gross Sauare Foota2e of all Floors ofBuildin2 320 b. The minimum total caliper inches shall contain the following minimum percentages of trees in various size ranges: BuUdinl! Heif!ht Percentap'e of Trees of Various Caliner Inches In Stories 2.0" B 3.0" 3.5" B4.0" 4.5" B 5.0" 1-2 50% 30% 20% 3-4 50% 30% 20% 5 and over 30% 50% 20% 29 c. Coniferous trees may be considered equivalent to the sizes shown by dividing the coniferous tree height in feet by 2.4. 6. Adjoining sites shall be considered in terms of species, location of trees, screening and overall landscape design. 7. Plant materials existing on a site at the time of development or expansion of structures, may be used as a credit against the requirements of these landscape regulations; the City Council shall determine the extent of the credit allowed, based on an evaluation of species, size, location, quality of existing plant materials and the consistency with the intent of these regulations. 8. A reasonable attempt shall be made to protect and preserve existing trees and incorporate them into the landscape plan. 9. A landscape performance bond or other acceptable surety is required for all screening or landscaping required in this ordinance. a. The amount of the bond shall be 125% of the cost of materials and installation. b. The bond shall be provided prior to the issuance of any building permits and shall be valid for one full year from the date of installation. 30 Attachment 3E-2 Current Woodbury Protection of Woodlands Requirements Ocotober 3, 2007, Plarming Commission Meeting DIVISION 3. PROTECTION OF WOODLANDS Page I of6 \ ~y) DIVISION 3. PROTECTION OF WOODLANDS Sec. 27-28. Purpose. The purpose of this division is to identify trees that are to be saved when development or land disturbing activity is occurring in wooded areas. It is the city's intent to protect, preserve, and enhance the natural environment of Woodbury and to encourage a resourceful and prudent approach to the development of wooded areas. In the interest of achieving these objectives, the city has established tree preservation regulations to promote the following: (1) Protection and preservation of the environment and natural beauty of the city. (2) Assurance of orderly development within wooded areas to minimize tree and habitat loss. (3) Evaluation of the impacts to trees and wooded areas resulting from development. (4) Establishment of minimum standards for tree preservation and the mitigation of environmental impacts resulting from tree removal. (Ord. No. 1759, S 1759.02, 1-12-2005) Sec. 27-29. Tree protection standards for developing properties. (a) Tree preservation plan. A tree preservation plan shall be submitted to and approved by the city, and implemented in accordance therewith in connection with any of the following: (1) New development in any zoning district. (2) New building construction in any zoning district. (3) Expansion of any existing commercial, industrial or institutional building or impervious surface by ten percent or greater, where an approved tree preservation plan is not on file with the city. (4) Any project for which a city land disturbance permit is required. (5) Removal of any healthy Specimen Tree on any parcel. (6) Removal of more than 30 percent of the diameter inches of the significant trees on any parcel. The tree preservation plan shall reflect the developer's best effort to determine the most feasible and practical layout of buildings, parking lots, driveways, streets, storage and other physical features, so that that the fewest significant trees are destroyed or damaged. (b) Tree preservation plan requirements. All applicants shall submit a tree preservation plan prepared in accordance with the provisions of this subdivision. The tree preservation plan shall be a separate plan sheet(s) that includes the following information: (1) The name(s), telephone number(s), and addressees) of the person(s) responsible for tree preservation during the course of the development project. (2) A tree inventory, indicating the size, species, general health, and location of all existing significant trees located within the area to be developed or within the parcel of record. All significant trees must be tagged in the field for reference on the tree preservation plan. These significant trees should be identified on the plan sheet in both http://libraryl.municode.com/mcc/Doc View/14365/!/!78/!80/!83 ?hilite=tree preservation; 9/24/2007 DIVISION 3. PROTECTION OF WOODLANDS Page 2 of6 graphic and tabular form. (3) A listing of the total diameter inches of healthy significant trees, total diameter inches of healthy hardwood trees, and total diameter inches of healthy coniferous trees. Dead, diseased, or dying trees do not need to be included in the totals. (4) A listing of the total diameter inches of healthy significant trees removed, total diameter inches of healthy hardwood trees removed and total diameter inches of healthy coniferous trees removed. (5) Outer boundary of all contiguous wooded areas, with a general description of trees not meeting the significant tree size threshold. (6) Locations of the proposed buildings, structures, or impervious surfaces. (7) Delineation of all areas to be graded and limits of land disturbance. (8) Identification of all significant trees proposed to be removed within the construction area. These significant trees should be identified in both graphic and tabular form. (9) Measures to protect significant trees. (10) Size, species, number and location of all replacement trees proposed to be planted on the property in accordance with the tree replacement schedule. (11) Signature of the person(s) preparing the plan. (c) Submission requirements. The tree preservation plan shall be submitted with any preliminary subdivision plan or site plan as required by the subdivision regulations of this Code; incorporated as a part of any landscape plan as required by the zoning regulations of this Code; or incorporated as part of a land disturbance plan and an application for any land disturbance permit as required by this Code. All tree preservation plans must be certified by a forester or landscape architect retained by the applicant. (d) Implementation. All sites shall be staked, as depicted in the approved tree preservation plan, and the required tree protection fencing shall be installed before land disturbance is to commence. The city shall inspect the construction site prior to the beginning of the land disturbance to ensure that protective fencing and other protective measures are in place. No encroachment, land disturbance, trenching, filling, compaction, or change in soil chemistry shall occur within the fenced areas protecting the critical root zone of the trees to be saved. (e) Allowable tree removal. Depending on the tree species being removed, up to 30 percent of the diameter inches of significant trees on any parcel of land being developed may be removed without replacement requirements. Replacement according to the tree replacement schedule is required when: (1) More than 30 percent of the total significant tree diameter inches are removed; (2) More than 30 percent of the tallyable hardwood deciduous tree diameter inches are removed; or (3) More than 30 percent of the significant coniferouslevergreen tree diameter inches are removed. The following types of trees do not need to be included as part of the tally of tree removals: (1) Dead, diseased, or dying trees; (2) Trees that are transplanted from the site to another appropriate area within the city; or (3) Trees that were planted as part of a commercial business such as a tree farm or nursery . http://libraryl.municode.com/mcc/Doc View/14365/1/178/180/183 ?hilite=tree preservation; 9/24/2007 DIVISION 3. PROTECTION OF WOODLANDS Page 3 of6 (f) Mitigation. (1) In any development where the allowable tree removal is exceeded, the applicant shall mitigate the tree loss by either: a. Planting replacement trees in appropriate areas within the development in accordance with the tree replacement schedule; b. Planting replacement trees on city property under the direction of the parks and recreation director or a designee; or c. Paying the city a sum per diameter inch calculated from the total number of diameter inches required for replacement trees in accordance with the tree replacement schedule. The fee per diameter inch shall be set forth in the city fee schedule, and the payment shall be deposited into an account designated specifically for tree planting. (2) The form of mitigation to be provided by the applicant shall be determined by the city. (3) The planting of trees for mitigation shall be in addition to any other landscape requirements of the city. (g) Tree replacement schedule. Tree removals over the allowable tree removal limit on the parcel shall be replaced according to the following schedule, which is in addition to the normal landscaping requirements for the development: (1) Hardwood deciduous tree species shall be replaced with new hardwood deciduous trees at a rate of one-half the diameter inches lost. Replacement trees must be a minimum of one inch in diameter. (2) Coniferous/evergreen species shall be replaced with new trees, either coniferous or deciduous, at a rate of one-fourth the diameter inches lost. Replacement trees must be a minimum of one inch in diameter. Since coniferous species are often sold by height rather than diameter inch, the following conversion formula can be used: Height of Replacement Coniferous Tree/2 = Diameter Inches of Credit. (3) Softwood species do not need to be replaced. (h) Species requirement. Where ten or more replacement trees are required, not more than 50 percent of the replacement trees shall be of the same species of tree without the approval of the city. (i) Warranty requirement. Any replacement tree which is not alive or healthy, as determined by the city, or which subsequently dies due to construction activity within two years after the date of project closure shall be removed by the applicant and replaced with a new healthy tree meeting the same minimum size requirements within eight months of removal. OJ Required protective measures. The tree preservation plan shall identify and require the following measures to be utilized to protect significant trees: (1) Installation of snow fencing or polyethylene laminate safety netting placed at the drip line or at the perimeter of the critical root zone (CRZ), whichever is greater, of significant trees, specimen trees, and significant woodlands to be preserved. No grade change, construction activity, or storage of materials shall occur within this fenced area. (2) Identification of any oak trees requiring pruning between April 15 and July 1. Any oak trees so pruned shall be required to have any cut areas sealed with an appropriate nontoxic tree wound sealant. (3) Prevention of change in soil chemistry due to concrete washout and leakage or http://libraryl.municode.com/mcc/Doc View/14365/l/178/180/183 ?hilite=tree preservation; 9/24/2007 DIVISION 3. PROTECTION OF WOODLANDS Page 4 of 6 spillage of toxic materials, such as fuels or paints. (4) Removal of any diseased oak or elm trees located in areas to be preserved. (k) Additional protective measures. The following tree protection measures are suggested to protect significant trees that are intended to be preserved according to the submitted tree preservation plan, and may be required by the city: (1) Installation of retaining walls or tree wells to preserve trees. (2) Placement of utilities in common trenches outside of the drip line of significant trees, or use of tunneled installation. (3) Use of tree root aeration, fertilization, andlor irrigation systems. (4) Therapeutic pruning. (I) Incentives. As an incentive to protect contiguous wooded areas, the city will allow the following: (1) Density transfer. Density of units that would be allowed in a protected wooded area may be transferred to other areas of the development, in excess of the density limits of the underlying zoning district. In order for the density transfer to be approved, the protected wooded area must be dedicated to the city. (2) Unit bonus. For each acre of wooded area preserved and dedicated to the city over and above the normal ten percent parkland dedication, the developer will be allowed an additional unit above the original unit allocation. (3) Developers that own parcels without trees may dedicate appropriate areas of their plats as "tree bank" areas. These areas would be available to accept trees planted as mitigation for tree removals from other sites. For each acre of "tree bank" area dedicated to the city over and above the normal ten percent parkland dedication, the developer will be allowed an additional unit above the original unit allocation. The areas proposed to be dedicated to a tree bank must be consistent with the city's comprehensive plan provisions for greenway opportunities, park plans, etc., or must be adjacent to or provide an enhancement to existing park facilities. Property dedicated must be useable upland (not wetlands, ponds, or utility easements, etc.). The city council will retain the discretionary right to determine whether or not it will accept the property proposed to be dedicated for a tree bank. (m) Compliance with the plan. The applicant shall implement the tree preservation plan prior to and during any construction. The tree protection measures shall remain in place until all land disturbance and construction activity is terminated or until a request to remove the tree protection measures is made to, and approved by, the city. (1) No significant trees shall be removed until a tree preservation plan is approved and except in accordance with the approved tree preservation plan as approved by the city. If a significant tree(s), intended to be preserved is removed without permission of the city or damaged so that it is in a state of decline within one year from date of project closure, a cash mitigation, calculated per diameter inch of the removedldestroyed tree in the amount set forth in the city fee schedule, shall be remitted to the city. (2) The city shall have the right to inspect the development andlor building site in order to determine compliance with the approved tree preservation plan. The city shall determine whether compliance with the tree preservation plan has been met. (n) Specimen trees. Removal of any specimen tree shall require a special permit in addition to the other requirements in section 27-29. (Ord. No. 1759, S 1759.02,1-12-2005) http://libraryl.municode.com/mcc/Doc View/14365/1/178/180/183 ?hilite=tree preservation; 9/24/2007 DIVISION 3. PROTECTION OF WOODLANDS Page 5 of6 Sec. 27-30. Tree protection standards for non-developing properties. (a) Undeveloped parcels. (1) There are no restrictions or permit requirements for removal of dead, diseased, or dyi ng trees. (2) Landowners not developing their property may remove up to 30 percent of the trees on their property, based on wooded area as of the date of approval of this ordinance, provided 14 days prior notice is given to the city. (3) If more than 30 percent of the trees on the property are to be removed for forest management purposes, the landowner must notify the city 14 days before the removals are to take place and supply the city with an approved forest management plan developed and approved by the department of natural resources' regional forester. (4) If a forest management plan is not prepared, a permit for the removals must be obtained from the city. The permit application must include a tree inventory, certified by a forester or landscape architect, which includes the size, species, and location of all existing significant trees located on the property. (5) Upon receipt of a completed tree removal permit application, the city will issue a permit within 14 days to allow removal of the trees. (6) If, within a ten-year time period of receiving a tree removal permit, the property is developed, the developer will be responsible for replacing the trees that were previously removed in accordance with section 27-29(g), tree replacement schedule. (b) Plaited residentiallals. (1) Owners of platted residential lots may remove up to 100 percent of the trees on the lot without replacement, with the exception of specimen trees. (2) Before a specimen tree is removed, an owner must obtain a permit from the city. (Ord. No. 1759, S 1759.02,1-12-2005) Sec. 27-31. Exceptions. (a) Exception standards. Notwithstanding the city's desire to accomplish the tree protection goals outlined in section 27-28, there may be instances where these goals are in conflict with other city objectives. These conflicts are most likely to occur on small, heavily wooded parcels. at the discretion of the city council, exceptions may be granted if all of the following conditions exist: (1) The subject parcel is five acres in size or less. (2) It is not feasible to combine the subject parcel with adjacent parcels that could use the parcel as required green space. (3) Strict adherence to the requirements of the tree ordinance would prevent development that is desirable to the city on the parcel. (4) The exception requested is the minimum needed to accomplish the desired development. (b) If an exception is granted, relief from the requirements of the ordinance may take the form of reduced mitigation requirements, greater allowable tree removal, higher thresholds for determining significant trees, or any combination of the above. The city council will determine http://libraryl.municode.com/mcc/Doc View/14365/1/178/180/183 ?hilite=tree preservation; 9/2412007 DIVISION 3. PROTECTION OF WOODLANDS Page 60f6 which form of relief best balances the objectives of the city and tree preservation. (Ord. No. 1759, S 1759.02,1-12-2005) Secs. 27-32--27-41. Reserved. http://libraryl.municode.com/mcc/Doc View/14365/1/178/180/183 ?hilite=tree preservation; 9/24/2007 Attachment 3 E- 3 Current Forest Lake Woodland Preservation Regulations ~ ~HlLLS Ocotober 3, 2007, Planning Commission Meeting City of Forest Lake WOODLAND PRESERVATION REGULATIONS ~ 153.295 PURPOSE. The purpose ofthis section is to govern the preservation and protection oftrees and woodlands within the city. The city recognizes the value oftrees and woodlands for absorbing air pollutants, reducing noise, providing shade, providing wildlife habitat, providing visual amenity, and preventing soil erosion and siltation. This section is adopted to ensure that development occurs in a marmer that protects and preserves these valuable resources. (Ord. 537, passed 11-8-2004) ~ 153.296 DEFINITIONS. For the purpose of this subchapter, the following definitions shall apply unless the context clearly indicates or requires a different meaning. APPLICANT. Any person or entity that is required to submit and implement an approved Woodland Preservation Plan under this subchapter. CALIPER INCH. The diameter of a tree measured at 4.5 feet above ground level. CONIFEROUS TREES. A wood plant which, at maturity, is at least 12 feet or more in height and has foliage on the outermost portions of the branches year round. CONSTRUCTION ZONE. Any area in which movement of earth, alteration in topography, soil compaction, disruption of vegetation, change in soil chemistry, or other change in the natural character of the land occurs as a result of the site preparation, grading, building construction, or any other construction activity. CRITICAL ROOT ZONE (CRZ). An imaginary circle surrounding the tree trunk radius distance of I foot per I inch of tree diameter (a 20 inch diameter tree has a CRZ with a radius of 20 feet). DRIP LINE. The farthest distance away from the trunk that rain or dew will directly fall to the ground from the leaves or branches of the tree. HARDWOOD DECIDUOUS TREE. Includes ironwood, oak, maple (hard), walnut, ash, hickory, birch, black cherry, hackberry, locust, and basswood. SIGNIFICANT WOODLAND. A grouping or cluster of coniferous and/or deciduous trees with contignous crown cover, occupying 15,000 or more square feet of property, and is comprised of deciduous trees of 6 caliper inches or more, and coniferous trees over 12 feet in height. SIGNIFICANT TREE. A healthy tree measuring a minimum of 6 caliper inches for all hardwood deciduous trees, a minimum of20 caliper inches for all softwood deciduous trees, or a minimum of 12 feet in height for all coniferous trees. SOFTWOOD DECIDUOUS TREES. Includes catalpa, cottonwood, poplars/aspen, box elder, willow, silver maple, and elm. (Ord. 537, passed 11-8-2004) S 153.297 WOODLAND PRESERVATION PLAN. (A) General submission requirements. A Woodland Preservation Plan required hereunder shall be submitted within: (I) Any preliminary subdivision plan as required within the Subdivision Code; (2) Any landscape plan as required by S 153.231 unless otherwise waived by the city; and (3) Any project for which a city grading permit is required by S 153.271 and when siguificant trees and/or woodlands exist on site. (B) Individual singlejamily lot requirement. Applicants of single-family residential building permits are required to prepare an individual lot Woodland Preservation Plan when significant trees and/or woodlands exist on site. (C) Plan requirements. (1) All Woodland Preservation Plans, with the exception of individual single- family residential lots, shall be certified by a forester, landscape architect, or other qualified professional retained by the applicant. (2) All applicants shall submit a Woodland Preservation Plan prepared in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. The Woodland Preservation Plan shall include the following information: (a) The name(s), telephone number(s), and addressees) of applicant's property owners, developers, and/or builders; (b) Delineation of the buildings, structures, or impervious surfaces situated thereon or contemplated to be built thereon; (c) Delineation of all areas to be graded and limits of the construction zone; (d) Size, species, and location of all existing significant trees and woodlands located within the area to be platted or within the parcel of record. These significant trees and woodlands shall be identified in both graphic and tabular form; ( e) Identification of all significant trees and woodlands proposed to be removed within the construction zone. These significant trees and woodlands shall be identified in both graphic and tabular form; (f) Measures to protect significant trees and woodlands; (g) Size, species and location of all replacement trees proposed to be planted on the property in accordance with the tree replacement schedule; and (h) Signature of the person preparing the plan. (D) Review process. The Woodland Preservation Plan shall be reviewed by the city to assess the best possible layout to preserve significant trees and woodlands and to enhance the efforts to minimize damage to significant trees and woodlands. The applicant shall meet with the city prior to submission of the development application, or prior to application for the grading permit, whichever is sooner, to determine the most feasible and practical placement of buildings, parking, driveways, streets, storage, and other physical features in order that the fewest significant trees and woodlands are destroyed or damaged. Once a plan is approved by the city, the plan shall be recognized as the approved Woodland Preservation Plan. (E) Performance guarantee. Any applicant of a new development shall provide the required performance guarantee following preliminary approval of the Woodland Preservation Plan and prior to any construction and/or grading. The amount of the performance guarantee to be subruitted, specific to the woodland preservation fulfillments, shall be calculated as follows: (1) An amount to guarantee preservation of all trees identified by the approved Woodland Preservation Plan to be preserved within the construction zone shall be deposited with the city. The amount shall be calculated by multiplying the total caliper inches of significant trees to be preserved by the rate of payment of $75 per caliper inch and/or the total square feet of woodlands to be preserved at the rate of$I.50 per square foot; (2) No performance guarantee shall be required for applicants for building permits of single-family residential additions and accessory structures; (3) Following written request by the applicant for acceptance, the performance guarantee will be released upon verification by the city that the Woodland Preservation Plan was followed and that the tree replacement schedule was complied with where necessary; in no event shall the performance guarantee be released earlier than 1 year after the date of the proj ect closure. (F) Compliance with Plan. (1) The applicant shall implement the Woodland Preservation Plan prior to and during any construction. The woodland protection measures shall remain in place until all grading and construction activity is terminated, or until a request is made to, and approved by, the city. (2) No significant trees or woodlands shall be removed until a Woodland Preservation Plan is approved and accepted in accordance with the approved Woodland Preservation Plan. If a significant tree or woodland that was intended to be preserved is removed without permission of the city, or damaged so that it is in a state of decline within 1 year from date of project closure, the cash guarantee calculated per caliper inch of the removed/destroyed tree or per total square foot of woodlands in the amount set forth herein shall be remitted to the city. (3) The city shall have the right to inspect the development and/or building site in order to determine compliance with the approved Woodland Preservation Plan. The city shall determine whether compliance with the Woodland Preservation Plan has been met. (Ord. 537, passed 11-8-2004) ~ 153.298 PERMITTED TREE REMOVALS. The city recognizes that a certain amount of tree removal is an inevitable consequence ofthe urban development process and therefore will likely result in the removal of some significant trees. Consequently, the city requires that significant tree removal beyond the following thresholds shall require reforestation or restitution as described below in S 153.299. (A) Trees may be removed within 15 feet from the face ofthe foundation of buildings, required parking areas, driveways, well areas, drain fields, essential utility areas, essential drainageways, easements, and rights-of-ways. (B) All diseased, hazardous, dead and dying trees may be removed. (C) Up to 10% of significant trees may be removed from existing improved parcels. (D) Trees and woodlands within the Shoreland Overlay District are subj ect to the requirements stated in SS 153.050 et seq., in addition to the regulations of this subchapter. (E) After tree removal the parcel must still meet the minimum requirements of the landscape section of this chapter. (Ord. 537, passed 11-8-2004) ~ 153.299 MITIGATION PROCEDURES. Trees or woodlands removed beyond the permitted threshold(s), as described above in S 153.298, shall be mitigated by the applicant through either of the following methods as determined by the city: (A) Replace the trees or woodlands in accordance with the tree replacement provisions as outlined below in S 153.300; or (B) Repay to the city the sum per caliper inch calculated from the total amount of caliper inches of the required replacement trees in accordance with the tree replacement provision in S 153.300. The fee per caliper inch shall be set north in the city fee schedule, and the payment thereon shall be deposited into an account designated specifically for tree ruitigation. (Ord. 537, passed 11-8-2004) ~ 153.300 TREE REPLACEMENT PROVISIONS. (A) Schedule. Size of Tree Damaged Number of Replacement Trees or Destroyed Category A Category B Category C Coniferous, 12 to 24 1 2 4 feet high Coniferous, 24 feet or 2 4 8 higher Hardwood deciduous, 1 2 4 6 to 20 inches diameter Softwood deciduous, 1 2 4 20 to 30 inches diameter Softwood deciduous, 2 4 8 greater than 30 inches diameter (B) Significant woodland replacement. Where replacement of a significant woodland is required, the applicant shall be responsible for furnishing and installing 1 Category A replacement tree or 2 Category B replacement trees or 4 Category C replacement trees for every 125 square feet of significant woodland damaged or destroyed, or any increment thereof. (C) Size of replacement trees. (1) Category A trees shall be no less than the following sizes: (a) Deciduous trees, not less than 4 caliper inches; (b) Coniferous trees, not less than 12 feet in height. (2) Category B trees shall be no less than the following sizes: (a) Deciduous trees, not less than 2-1/2 caliper inches; (b) Coniferous trees, not less than 6 feet in height. (3) Category C trees shall be no less than the following sizes: (a) Deciduous trees, not less than 1-1/2 caliper inches; (b) Coniferous trees, not less than 4 feet in height. (D) Species requirement. Where 10 or more replacement trees are required, not more than 50% of the replacement trees shall be of the same species of tree without the approval of the city. (E) Warranty requirement. Any replacement tree which is not alive or healthy, as determined by the city, or which subsequently dies due to construction activity within I year after the date of proj ect closure, shall be removed by the applicant and replaced with a new healthy tree meeting the same minimum size requirements within 8 months of removal. (F) Additional requirements. The replanting of trees for mitigation shall be in addition to any other landscape requirements of the city. (Ord. 537, passed 11-8-2004) ~ 153.301 REQUIRED PROTECTIVE MEASURES. The following measures shall be utilized to protect significant trees and woodlands during any type of grading or construction: (A) Installation of snow fencing or polyethylene laminate safety netting placed at the drip line or at the perimeter of the critical root zone (CRZ), whichever is greater, of significant trees and woodlands to be preserved. No grade change, construction activity or storage of materials shall occur within this fenced area; (B) Identification of any oak trees requiring pruning between April 15 and July 1. Any oak trees so pruned shall be required to have any cut areas sealed with an appropriate non-toxic tree wound sealant; (C) Prevention of change in soil chemistry due to concrete washout and leakage or spillage of toxic materials, such as fuels or paints. (Ord. 537, passed 11-8-2004) ~ 153.302 ADDITIONAL PROTECTIVE MEASURES. The following tree protection measures are suggested to protect siguificant trees and woodlands that are intended to be preserved: (A) Installation of retaining walls or tree wells to preserve trees; (B) Placement of utilities in cOmmon trenches outside of the drip line of siguificant trees or use oftunneled installation; (C) Use of tree root aeration, fertilization, and/or irrigation systems; (D) Transplanting of significant trees into a protected area for later moving into permanent sites within the construction area; (E) Therapeutic pruning. (Ord. 537, passed 11-8-2004) Northwestern College Master Plan Northwestern College Roseville and Arden Hills, Minnesota Stormwater Management Study TKDA (see separately attached report) Submitted: Revised: Revised: Project No. ENGINEERS. ARCHITECTS. PLANNERS November 15, 2006 January 18, 2007 August 27, 2007 13529.000 444 Cedar Slreel, Suile 1500 Saint Paul, MN 55101.2140 (651)292.4400 (651) 292.0083 fax www.tkda.com Northwestern College Master Plan Northwestern College Roseville and Arden Hills, Minnesota Traffic and Parking Impact Study TKDA Submitted: Revised: Revised: Project No. ENGINEERS. ARCHITECTS. PLANNERS November 15, 2006 January 18, 2007 April 24, 2007 13529.000 444C'darSlreet, Suit' 1500 Saint Paul, MN 55101.2140 (651)292.4400 (651) 292.0083-1ax www.tkda.com B UU UFEAND HEALTH RTNESS CENTER NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE . ,.,.. ~"'"':- o CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT JANUARY 1986 TOLTZ KING DUVALL ANDERSON AND ASSOCIATES INC. PROGRAM SPACE SUIlolARY The proposed plan contains the following gross square footage, by level: . Level A!Offlce, Classroom, Storage 14,650 34,050 . Gymnasium (Level Al . Level B/Lockers, Racquetball and Mechanical 20,500 12,400 4.400 . Entry, Control, Clrc. and Lounge . MechanIcal Penthouse Total GSF 86,000 The Program Assignable Space (ASFl totals 13,000 which Is 85 percent of the gross building area. I NOI V I DUAL SPACE SUIlolARY The programmed facilities and areas Include: Level (Al . GYMNAS IUM The gymnasium contains four full-size basketball courts, a 160- meter track, bleacher seating for 2000 and features a multi-use synthetic floor surface. The basketball courts can also be used for volleyball and badmltTen. . STORAGE (Gymnasium) Equipment storage Is available within the gymnasIum and Is also accessible from the exterior playing fields. . . SUPERVISION OFFICE (Gymnasluml The Supervisor's office has visual access to both gymnasium and atrium space for activity supervision and control within the facility. TROPHY AREA The Trophy Area Is a display area for trophies, awards and commemorative plaques, etc. . 11 CKE1I NG The ticketing counter Is a multi-functional space within 1he lobby. It Is the place tor sale of event tickets and also the Information and Building Control Desk. 2 8453 . QASSROOM The classroom has a capacity of 75 persons and can be partitioned off to create two classrooms. . CXlNFERENCE AND SEMINAA ROOM Th I s I s a room to be used for sma II group meetl ngs, semi oars and office meetings. . OFFICES The offices for coaches and athletic directors are oriented toward Little Lake Johanna. The offices are also grouped around the shared functions such as the workroom, Video room and toilet facilIties. All offices have access to the secretary, reception and a conference and seminar room and focus on the main entrance. LEVEL CB) . RACQUETBALL/HANDBALL COURTS There are three racquetball courts one of which has a glass end wall for observation to be used for exhibItion and teaching. . WEIGHT ROOM The weight room presents a quality environment for exercise wIth" exterior exposure which provides a vIew and the opportunity for fresh air ventilation during temperate times of the year. Also, It Is highly visible from the corridors and Intramural office. . TRAINING ROOM The training room Is centrally located within the locker complex for equal access by men, women and members of varsity sports and equipment managers. . ISSUE/STORAGE/LAUNDRY This has close proximity to lockers for equipment Issue and access to the training room. . WH IRLPOOL The whirlpool Is directly adjacent to the training room for the purpose of control and supervision by training personnel. . VISITING LOCKER ROOMS The v I s I tors I locker rooms can be used as two separate locker rooms or as a single team locker facility allowing access from one side to the other for coaches or team members. The locker facility also has direct exterior access. . MEN I S LOCKER ROOMS This part of the locker facIlity Is divided Into two parts. Men's VarsIty and Men's Physical Education and Intramural lockers. Both have accessibility to the future pool, as well as direct access to the outdoors. 3 8453 . WOMEN'S LOCKER ROOMS Access to future pool has been built Into the plan, as well as ample space for separatIon of Varsity athletes and physical education and Intramural sports users. . VIP LOCKER ROOMS The VIP.locker rooms wIll be used by faculty, visitors, and game officials. Most Importantly, the room wll I be avaIlable to Northwestern College alumni wishIng to use the Life and Health/Fitness Center facilItIes. . LOUNGE The lounge Is a place for alumnI, students, vIsitors, and staff to Interact, study or relax. The lounge looks out upon the recreational green and the forest whIch borders Little Lake Johanna. 4 8453 SITE RESPONSE The general location of the LIfe and Health/Fitness Center was established based on the location of existing and proposed athletic fields, the existing and proposed campus road system and existing and proposed routes of pedestrian movement. Offices and the Level B Entry are oriented to the north for best use of the view allowing the gymnaslllll and lockers closer proximity to playing fields. . A transition from the wild lake side to the controlled campus Interior grounds Is achieved by providing a physical and visual passage below and around the administrative office wing. The passage opens upon a recreational and study green which borders the forest surrounding Little Lake Johanna. . It was determined early In the planning process that only a IIlnlllllll number of parking spaces (30) could be provided Immediately adjacent to the Life and Health Fitness Center. Event parking wll I have to be accommodated on a campus wide basis. 5 8453 .-:.~.....::---_.__. I' ..>------.. I~ ". >~__=:~ '~- ~ Il 0 0 -'!'7r ! ~fjll{ '1;----- _ ....- - r;:::: ::..< LEVEL A . , '/,/ %/' .. j...J_.f. '--r -...::::~:' " _m......L _.._..--====-~ ---, ~ 1 {--------.)O 0 .~ f f' ~ I " o uu / '--, (I .) +0 ....""'..1lCa "ClIIAOI ----~ ~ 9 " 0'. , '" ...--~ I - 1 1 ENTRY. "I 1 I 1 , 'r-~_Ol :' " ,.,. 11 " ~ -' q , I , ,-, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .'K '_..' 'r--i.j1 8453 B UU ,.. " ..:.:~.. "~'\::.. o ,. ,. u u OU'MOil .....,.. '"' _I~_..... /6 / / / /0 / / / / ? o o /0 / --------.., I I I I I I I I I ""..Not.. --- _w~ ..- - - I I I I I I I I ~ ') I I I I ~-------....., ~--------------- ....c.a..",IO..-.cr r- - - -- , , I I I .J LEVEL B 'r--iJiJ 10 8453 B UU Conceptual Building Plans for New Residence Hall - Previous PUD i I EAST ELEVATION ~~~~~= , . u - '. m m m m m .lliD ti:fD Ijl 1il--.lll_~_~~~JlJt~.~ "ILir.ti:i:i:r . NORTH ELEV A TJON TRANSVERSE SECTION r--t.rU 11 8453 I -J I , , t ! I ~ . .f= I r m .t l .~'" 1 1 , PARKINq ZI ,." III .. .. '" a; .,.. ".';">,"' 114'-0 7"~ 05'-0 tr~ ," I ;: ~' LOUNGE: a! .. "'" .:, a . T.Y. LOUNGE: .. . ;,. .. 1 o .. . . ~----"~-~---io. .. . ;,.' .. . . '-;S'-o - ~ '< ~YU .i!tj '-g" ~r~ SCAU""""'ll':1 118 flil! I Il!!ll ~~l ".l " I' M~! iLl;;, I I.;".~j~.. I O~ r~ ~~ >,~, e ~w Of! a;:fI) Q) OJ .... '" /fJ) ~ OJ w ~ ~- ~ '" ..... ~ ~ fI) o .~~ ~ ~~;~ 'mU GROUND FLOOR PlAN ...."'."...~~41 '-&I'" ~ l 1 .. .. " a; AEROBIC' HECH 111 1 i i , J 140_Q It.fi.APART ~ I I : ..AIN ,OUNG:< 1 ST ,OE I I t....-o "ARKlfrllQ, ze T J ~ ;, OUND PARKING PLAN UNDERGR , . I I li. I ~ 711'-0 64."0 .,.. ~./ ~ o ~ ~ ~ (f) j I b 5 ! ii.U . I 1:1 :I: ! () tt I < Ii. U. 0:. Og f--'~'"' I !n.gJj . a:: 5; w ~~ I- a~ ..J at ~R~ ;> ~~ ~-, .' -,- -~ . ! i~: .. ... i , i' ;'';y,-.. , f_k.. - ~~ .~ , if ~~ l ~ ~- .~~ ,."",'.:1,"" . ~~~"'4 ,~ f.! . -'" ~ o ." .. ~ U "l!i'l WUL TI-PURP08E '-~-' ~, T":) ~ CHAml '~~~.c'!:!M~ .,.~.-~ - *.~ ""if . ~."!~ , -h.:.. ~ Lm!ltARY " ; . . ':- 'i. . . " '. { 1.fIO:PE~, IIAU~,~~GE ~, · SECOND f''-OO~' PLAN .,' ~1! STUDY LAiiGE -IIEET1N 8TUilc\;' ~ THIRD FLOOR PLAN 8CA!..E: f-II '! ~;"",~,. ~ o 2 z ~ " en II ~ ~ o L W t !:: J: U '1;": Cl: u. U. lI:z o ~.. ~ ut; cn_~~ tX ~i: W<l~ &- ~~ ..J ;: o ~~ ~ E~ :;f - .-:. 'I!' 's! I!!~ I'" "I il': ill , 1111' It! I f I ~ l I ;d ..;.,_';\ ~.i:' ~Ilt- cog Qt.~ I~~ IU ;;.l;J ~,',~ S' 2!ffi :oe 11:", Q.l .. OJ _ 'Ill: tI:l ~ OJ &Ii, ~ ~ r;S ~ ~ '" o ~. Z If '~.lqfll)4 '~1c- ...... 4 ~ SCALE:1-.1S'-O _.' A-5 . . 'OUTLINE SPECIF~CATION 1. GENERAL Project will be designed and constructed to meet or exceed all applicable local and state codes. All necessary permits and/or licenses will be provided. 2. SITE Entire site will be developed including walks, curbing, driveways. All unpaved <!rea will be landscaped with trees and shrubs indiginous 'to the. climate. P<!rking level will be concrete floor.' 3. STRUCTURE Substructure as required by soils engineer report. Floors and Roof: Pre-cast planks, bearing walls: concrete block. 4 . EXTERIOR Walls generally block with some stucco. aluminum, A-2 rated thermal break with Entrances colored alwilinum. Roofing ballasted. Windows - colored insulating glass'. Rubber membrane 5. INTERIOR Floors - generally carpeted, ceramic or quarry tile in wet and heavy traffic areas. Walls - generally concrete block. Ceilings - spray texture. Metal door frames with Legacy doors. 6. EQUIPMENT Elevator - pre-engineered.hydraulic S'x7', 50 fpm. Fireplace- steel prefabricated, energy saving with exterior combustion air intakes. 7. MECHANICAL \ Through wall Singer Heating & Air Conditioning units thermostatically controlled in each suite. '. TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE BSMT (GARAGE ALTERNATE) GRD. FLR. 2ND FLR. 3RD FLR. 7,632 27,266 27,266 27,266 TOTAL 89,430 +(19,634 + (19,634) r- i J I I I I I I I I I -,._.>,~., .~. "",;. ' . ~. ;4.;,' . -.':,t.- t I I , I I i I I I ......... ..u..u .. ../ "t ;.".; W'ES1' ,El:.eVAT10N . I I ; I SOU'IH ,EL~\f A TION -t'-".-,.__"o._, ~ '-!'-f .$'" " ;'..,.,j ." '. .~ '. -;..."< ~-=c~~~=~::~~,~~~==:' ES:'C,~~.=~,,'3'~?=-C-- .t", EA~'~LEVATION . I ~ 1(' ~-~ .~. ~> .~- ....... NORTH ELEVATION ~.Cl 2P ~g ":0 SCALE l~ --~ . . U ~ ;2: m l '~ _~ I w. '''1 J ~ 5 i U :: f W ~ I t: I J: U Ql' <( !l. U. 1t<>: Og L..o.,.,,~. ~ r- 6t- .ft OU '" .~ 0:: ~~ W.~;! r ~~. .,Jiiia: O~.~ :;:" ~z , . lZ::S ";t il uhi!,U;, lJ ilil i."K !~~i ~ ..... ~ .'" ~ ~ ~ " g 11:1 I' 5~ih I ~i'!! ~:iH I . ~;Hi t ',.., ,! J:::~;'-c--J;i' l ~ >i I 1~ii51 QJ ~ I m~ <_:';~'_'~ I ~..!j;l!!. ,~~~ .'''''''~'t . ...J,!M . >(J E UlZ 0!U . 00 Q.l "'~ "''''' '" ~ i ~ .~ .:i : ...,. w ~ en e f /Z f _cm<o,," ~O~ (;~:--> .. DT-b~ NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE LONG RANGE CAMPUS , MASTER PLAN ~' I , ) . SUBfylfTTED DECEMBER 2003 ~. " PREPARED BY: ,- PA8:TNERS & SIR NY ARCHITECTS 212 WESf FRANKLIN AYEN0E MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55404 612/341..1070 , , PARTNERS &5JRf\.lY {{ r c h i t " c s December 2003 Mr. Douglas Schroeder Vice President for Business & Finance Northwestern College St Paul, Minnesota Dr. Harold Miller Provost Vice President for Academic Affairs Northwestern College St Paul, Minnesota Dear Mr. Schroeder and Dr. Miller, This planning document describes the basic overview, approach and analyses that have been employed in preparing Northwestern College's Campus Master Plall. From its beginning, this Campus Master Plan was intended to be a planning framework, which can adjust to meet unforeseen changes in the future. We hope this planning exercise will remain active, evoking the participation of faculty, staff and students in shaping their future. It is vital to the future development of the college to rally widespread support in responding to the needs of the campus programs and users. This report makes realistic assessments of physical needs of the college, but also makes some observations in the area of policy and management. This might sound like the study exceeds the confines of the original scope, yet these issues all have implications in utilization of the College's facilities. During the course of our study, it was obvious both in interviews and actual observations that faculty and staff are sincerely dedicated and earnest in their desire to work within the constraints of the existing facilities. It was also obvious that the College's facilities are well kept and help mitigate space issue concerns by providing a clean and supportive environment. On a personal level, I thoroughly enjoyed working on your campus. You have an admirable group of people that truly make the College what it is. They generate a supportive and encouraging atmosphere for all those on campus to absorb, myself included. They were a joy to work with, but more importantly, the type of environment that they create generates an exceptional setting for the students to live and learn in. I'm sure that as students move on, they will carry those values of care and respect with them throughout life. ~ :j~'1 ~-g g In closing, we wish to thank you for selecting our firm to engage in such an important project for your institution. We also would like to thank those who contributed to the assessment process. We hope the results will meet your expectations and help with effective and efficient campus management, as well as serve as one component of the College's institutional plan. u Enthusiastically, -."", PART~'RS & SlRNYlLP f::::::Jf(Jv 212 West Franklin Avenm.' Partners & Sirny LLP. iHi'meapolisMinneSO!a 55404Architects & Planners Telephone 612.]41.1070 F'lcsimi/e 612.341.2124 gcneral@partnersandsirny.com NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE P ARTlCJPAI,<YS - Partners & Sirny would like to especially thank the following North- western College personnel for their assistance. Dr. Alan Cureton Mr. Douglas Schroeder Dr. Hal Miller Dr. Barbara Lindman Participants Mark Baden Ruth Ball Dr. lerry Bei/by Dan Crane John Delich Michael Ek Asa Ferguson lane Goedeke Monica Groves Matt Hill Dr. Doug Huffman Dr. Barbara Lindman Dr. Hal Miller, Co-Chair Steve Morrow Randy Riesberg Douglas Schroeder, Co-Chair Dale Solberg Cheryl Seiffert Dr. Tim Tomlinson Planning Consultants Partners & Sirny Architects Laurence Page CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHHECTS PAGE NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE TABLE OF CONTENTS .. SUMM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PART I THE PLANNING CHARGE The Planning Charge nm.nnmn....___mn.___....___n.n__n..n..________nnnnnn__.n.nnn__.nn 1.1 The Planning Process n__.n....__n__.__n.n.......________.__._____n__________m.__________.__.____.nnnn 1.2 The Facilitiies Plan ___........____.._____________..n__nnn___..___.______...._____n__.nn____.....__.____.____.1.3 The Institutional Plan nmnmmnn___...______.hh____n....______..__hh.__m......._____.____...__n__h 1.4 PART II OVERVIEW OF NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE Identification __... .....__.______ 'nm___. .___.___h...._____.__ mn___.__....hhhh______n . _____..__ ____ .______n 2. I College History and Background h__h.__h_____.__..___..___________..._____......__.__n__h.m.nn2.1 College's Market Position __________...hh.______..__.. __h....__ __hn.___.... ______m mn_________.h____. 2.4 Nortl1western Radio Network ......n..n..................n......................................... ....2.4 College's Organiza tion nn....__...hh.....____..__ __.__._...____..__..__.__.____.......____.._______..__.___. 2.4 College's Internal Relationships .........__._____.__m.....__..____..__......_____.__.____..____.....___2.6 Campus Population __.n..______________nm. ___.__.....____nn___.__. .__.____..______________....___.___..___. 2.6 Campus Growth ______.__n'___. ________.....__h________________._________ __..__ __h..___..__________.. '__'___..___. 2.8 College's External Relationships ------...--.-----.----...__..______..______...n..._______.__.__.n.n2.10 Si te Context. '__'n...n.n '____'m.m "_____'__' .mm.._______________..._____________._______________.___________ 2.11 Land Use and Zoning______.mn..n.__....__..____________n___.____________________________.h.___..________2.12 Existing College Computer System._____..__.__h___.n...___________.m._____________._____________2.13 Existing Campus Utilities --------...--..----------.n._____________n_________.nn.________.____...__.____2.14 Existing Parking Distribution__....__ '____h... ___.___.____. ___________h_____.____.______.n___..________ 2.15 PART III PLANNING ISSUES & ANALYSES Site Constraints.. ...n.................................................. .................. ......... ....n............. 3.1 Planning Context - Issues Analysis --.------______hm__.._________.n___.__.____.____________.__._____3.2 Facilities & Grounds Related Issues.______.__..________.____.________hn___.___..__nh..n___________3.3 Academic Program Issues..u.................................................. ............... ... .......h.... 3.5 Academic Area Assignment Summary ..---.-----.-----.-------.--________________________.n.___..3.17 Academic Program Space Analysis_________._______.._____________._________._________________.____.3.18 Campus Site/Facilities Capacity _______n__.____.__h___.__.___h..._________.._________________....___ 3.19 CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE jj NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE TABLE OF CONTENTS .. Campus Technologies Issues ..................... .................. .......... ............................. 3.20 Site Constraints...... ................................................... .............. ..""'''''''''''''' .......... 3.21 PART IV COLLEGE GOALS Mission, Objectives, Accreditation & Affiliations................................................... 4.1 PARTV RECOMMENDATIONS GeneraL....................... ''''''.. ................................................................................... 5.1 Policy ........... .. ............... .... ....................... ................................................................ 5.2 Image...... ..... ................................ .............................................................n.......... 5.5 Facili ties ....... n.n.. ........ ..................... nn..................n ....n.........n............................... 5.7 Operations .................................. .....n....... .......n.........................................n........... 5.9 Miscellaneous ...................................... ........................... .... .................. ............... .5.10 Operations.......n...........................n................................n...................................n.5.11 PART VI IMPLEMENTATION Implementations ......n....................un..n. .................n........................n...........n.... 6.1 Development Framework ..................................................................................... 6.2 Phasing .... .nn...................n..n...........n... '.... n ..n.. '.....nn nn.................. ..... ..n............ 6.3 Cost Projections .........n.... ...... '''hnh.. ..... ..o.. ..................... ....................................... 6.4 Costs n.. ........................n....... ''''''..'''..n......... .................. n...... n... ..n.....n.................. 6.5_ PART VB APPENDICES Glossary. ......................n................. ..........................nnnn.......... nnn.........n........... Al Instructional Space Summaries ....n..................................Uh............................... B.I Meeting Minutes .....................n...............n............................nn....n........n.......... C.l Campus Studies...........n...................... ..............n..... nnnn.........................n.......... 0.1 Facility Data and Resources .........................n......n...nnn.....n..............un..n........E.l f, CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHJTECTS PAGE iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .. Executive Summary Northwestern College is at a precipitous time in its distinguished 100 year plus history. Growth has been remarkable over the last decade, and is a direct commentary on the College's success. That impressive emollment increase has allowed the College to further spread its word. Moving into its second century, the College appointed a new Presi- dent in 2003. In his relatively short tenure on campus, Dr. Alan Cureton has infused a wonderful sense of energy and enthusiasm that will help guide the future of Northwestern College. The new vision of Northwestern College promotes expansion of its programs, with an emollment target of 2400 full-time equivalent stu- dents in its traditional programs. This expansion also advances its alternative education programs, and the beginnings of a Masters pro- gram. While supporting the College's mission, the expansion will also provide a new economy of scale to its financial and operational needs. At the same time, the proposed increase in emollment will exacerbate the current shortage of available space on campus, and as a result, emollment has been forced to be limited. In response to this situation, the Campus Master Plan used the 2001 Space Utilization Study as a significant stepping-off point. Change is inevitable... planning is a method to direct change. The planning process has reviewed, analyzed and assessed the issues on campus, and with input from all constituencies on campus, has developed a flexible "recipe" for working with space use planning and other significant topics on campus... for current and potential future issues. A yearly review of the Master Plan should assess cur- NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS SUMM.l NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE EXECUTIVE SU~L\1ARY .. rent status of the plan's goals and objectives, and then updates can be prepared to reflect, and adapt to, changes in the college. Among those discussed in the body of this plan, some of the major expansion issues that the College is faced with include: maintaining and elevating academic quality, academic and non-academic schedul- ing, current site capacity, internal and adjacent land use / circulation, growing urban forces, campus image (including its marketing and recruitment impact), financial forces as it relates to quality and image of its facilities, recruitment of students and faculty, and Ihe continual moving target of educational technology. As part of this Campus Master Plan, a financial model was developed to outline potential major capital projects costs, and package them into manageable groups, It should be noted, that as ever changing forces impact the college, flexibility of the Plan 'Framework' allows Ihe Col- lege to reassess, realign and reorder its facilities priorities... whether that be 5 or 75 years from now. For success of the physical plan, a well conceived Capital Campaign needs to be developed, marketed and diligently managed. To achieve these construction objectives in support of academic goals, college administrators need to "stay the course" with Master Plan goals and objectives, Focusing on both the short term and long term impacts will assure the long term viability of Northwestern College. As any successful institution knows, the Mission is its guiding force. if anything, always test against mission. What is best for the college, so it can continue to spread God's word. With yearly reassessment and diligently staying the course, we believe that this Campus Master Plan will guide Northwestern College well in to the 21st century. 11 CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SJRNY ARCHlTECTS SUMM.2 ,..,... '. '. \. " \_- , " '. l (, L l '-- NORTHW_ESTERN _COLl,:EGE THE PLANNING CHARGE .. .THEPLANNINCCHARGE . .. . . THE PLANNING PROCESS . CAMPUS - "MASTER PLAN "5 E-c.i.J ON PARTNERS (,( SIRN.Y ARCHITECTS THE PLANNING CHARGE .. The Planning Charge The firm of Partners & Simy Architects was retained by Northwestern College to develop a Campus Master Plan that integrated academic planning with facilities planning. This Campus Master Plan was developed in response to the charges set by the leaders of Northwestern College (NWC). Accordingly; the Plan was to understand and develop solutions for the physical needs and operational potentials of the College in light of issues affecting the col- lege. The major issues include: L Significant increase in emollment over recent years 2. Enrollment limit expanding to 2,400 average FTE 3. Increasing integration of educational and administrative operations with technology 4. Campus physical capacity The planning charge / directives were also influenced by general issues on campus. Among them: . organization and operation . coordination with local developments . internal and external relationships . improvements in circulation . characteristics of student population Among others, the Campus Master Plan was to examine and reflect: . the inventory of site and building use student emollment projections space utilization (taken from Space Utilization Study of April 2001) analysis of projected facilities needs campus' ability to expand evaluation of the campus image and visibility confirmation of campus goals recommendations for campus development cost estimates for the recommendations . . . . . . . . NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 1.1 <rJ Q) ..... OJ:) Q) ..... <ll l-< ..... CJ') I:: <ll - ~ S t NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE THE PLANNING CHARGE .. The Planning Process Facilities planning concerns itself with shaping the environment for humans, therefore its success depends on people who make planning work. Consequently, effective planning is participatory planning. The planning process for this master plan was a highly participatory pro- cess. At the beginning of the planning process, the Planning Commit- tee was established to facilitate the College's participation in the plan- ning process. Working committee members were selected to represent views of the faculty and staff, to help identify issues and the goals which were to set planning directions and targets. They participated in the reviews of planning stages, development pro-- posals and commented on them. Plan ral11 eWork This planning process is not fore- casting. It intends to provide a planned framework which would guide the college's development for the next decade. It should serve as a guidebook of strategies for those leaders of the College who concern themselves with the devel- opment of the entire or part(s) of the College considering the goals the College set for itself. " Plan o Target Interviews of the various academic programs and administrative staff were undertaken in the early weeks of the study. The planning team then reviewed existing information about academic programs, class scheduling, registration data, operating procedures, surveyed the extent and capacity of the physical plant, received student emollment history and placement data. Traffic and zoning, utilities and develop- ment data were obtained from city agencies. The purpose was to iden- tify, analyze and clarify issues of concern and basic goals and reconcile them with one another, if possible, within the context of the Campus Master Plan. ategy Ph a e s Cataloging the existing needs and physical resources enabled the plan- ning team to estimate the capacities of the existing plant, evaluate its flexibility to absorb additional growth in emollment and approximate the extent for expansion. CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SJRNY ARCHITECTS FAGE 1.2 THE PLANNING CHARGE .. Space survey data (see previous Space Utilization Study of April 2001) helped understand existing space use patterns. The team researched space planning guidelines used in education programs of other states and observed teaching functions in progress. Space demand and data analyses were conducted and used in assessing program space require- ments and in making recommendations. Also, space utilization was reviewed in conjunction with other collegiate space utilization studies. Additionally, space quality as it facilitates the educational program and safety considerations were reviewed. The administrative organization of the College has been highly stable. Along the desired trait of stability was the issue concerning" cluster- ing" of programs, facilitating potentials of coring classes and sharing resources were strong motivations for suggesting "like" programs/ classes/ offices to be adjacent to each other. The plan, accommodating the recommendations and illustrating a logi- cal development option, did not intend to be specific as to wallloca- tions, and other specific design features. These were to be left for the interpretation of the building programming and designing teams. Also, program needs and even goals may change before implemen- tation of the recommendations is complete. The evaluation of resources and Facilities Pian the list of goals and objectives need to be reviewed periodically to insure consistency and proper design response to the educational needs governing at the time of the design. Academic Plan iNSTITUTiONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & $lRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 1.3 The Facilities Plan The purpose of this Campus Master Plan is to ensure that the College's physical environment suits the needs and requirements of the users and facilitates the edu- cational work and efforts of those who operate within the institu- tion's mission and boundaries . sets the course for an orga- nized approach to the College's development . helps the institution deal with changes in an organized, rational manner while adhering to guid- ing goals and objectives THE PLANNING CHARGE .. . brings together eXlshng resources and projected establishes departore points for an on-going planning needs effort. . The Institutional Plan A Facilities Plan is the physical component of a comprehensive Instito- tional Development Plan. As the chart above indicates, an overall Insti- totional Plan would provide a framework for the separate systems to function together as a coordinated whole. In an educational institotion, the direction of the institotion is usually set by the academic endeavors. All other functions are auxiliary to the educational endeavors and exist to support them. The educational goals are supplemented by financial and facilities goals and, properly oriented, all dovetail into the overall mission of the institotion. Education in a system should not suffer from unequal resources. The purpose of an Institotional (Campus) Development Plan is to: ... correlate the human, educational, financial, physical and intangible elements of the educational environment into an optimal relationship within the Institution. Used to its potential, the Institotional Development Plan becomes a formidable tool in the hands of the College's administration to manage limited resources and to promote the image of a well-organized instito- tion. It may also assist in obtaining funding for the endeavors of an organization that can identify its physical limitations and one which knows where it is going. Coordinated by the Institotional Plan, facilities planning will be tied to institotional goals, program objectives, financial limitations and plans, and organizational and manpower planning. Subplans prepared for these individual, major functions should integrate the units into a com- prehensive system of planning and management Periodic Review & Monitoring of Plan Implementation In order to make such reviews effective, data and methods should be documented and maintained as the college implements this plan: I) data on basic inventory, space need projections, stodent enrollment, space use and station utilization, and the like be maintained by the director for facilities planning 2) a Facilities Planning Committee take" ownership" of the plan, oper- ate on a scheduled basis, and use the Master Facilities Plan as a ref- NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 1.4 THE PLANNING CHARGE .. erence for all projects implemented on campus 3) planning issues be inventoried, discussed, analyzed and resolved in terms of the Facilities Master Plan 4) the College's planning goals as outlined in this report be reviewed to insure their validity 5) the College's facility planner update plan elements, prepare! commission necessary studies and guidelines, review other consul- tant studies, and guide development conformance with the Campus Master Plan 6) the Campus Master Plan be considered as a working document that is reviewed and updated as a continuous cycle AI 1P1!'@@@gjgj @t! (f1!'@lIiIgjDfilaUIIiI@ AI@fillfi/@l!iIfJu@ @@filDgj Ullila@ IPIJoJf!l)U@filD IJifil@uDffaD@!l) Planning Cycle NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 1.5 , '"'''. ~. . .'NO.RTH.W.ESTERN CO'l.LE.GE' "--- OVERVIEW OF NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE Ell .' IDENTJFICAnON.. NISTORY & BACKGROUND :.. . . . ,NORTHWESTERNCOLLECa;'S MARKET POSlTION NORTIIWESTERNRADio NEJWORK C;:OLLEGE'S ORGANIMTION .. . . . . .." . COLLEGE'S INTERNAL RELATIONSHIPS CAMPUS POPULATION CAMPUS POPULA'noNGRoWTH CAMPusENR6LiJ\~ENT . . COLLEGE'S EXTERNAL RELATIONSHIPS. . SITEGJNTEXT. , LAND USE AND ZOl'llNG PARKING DISTRIilUTION EXISTING COLLECE COMPUTER SYSTI;:MS . .. . EXISTING .UTILlTiES C/!,MPUS MASrER PLAN. . . PARniI;RS .~ SIRNY ARC~ITEtrs SECTION II OVERVIEW OF NORTHWESTER1'. COLLEGE .. Identification Northwestern College is incorporated under the laws of the State of Minnesota as a College of the Bible, Arts and Sciences, and Professional Education. It is registered with the Minnesota Higher Education Ser- vices Office (MHESO). College History and Background The College was established as Northwestern Bible and Missionary Training School at First Baptist Church of Minneapolis on 2 October 1902. The founder and first president of Northwestern was Dr. William Riley, pastor of First Baptist Church. From 1902 to 1924, Northwestern class- rooms and administration functions were housed in the educational buildings of First Baptist Church. In 1924, Northwestern moved from the church to Jackson Hall, specifically built to accommodate both church and school programs. The institution experienced major growth from 1902-1947. The Northwestern Theological Seminary was established in 1935, and the College of Liberal Arts in 1944. Collectively, the Bible School, Theological Seminary and College of Liberal Arts were known as "The Northwestern Schools". In 1948, Northwestern moved to the new Memorial Hall, a large multi-purpose building across from Loring Park near down- town Minneapolis. In 1949, President Billy Graham helped established KTIS radio station as an outreach ministry affiliated with Northwestern College. In 1951, the Bible School became a degree-granting institution by adding a fourth year to the three year curriculum. Degrees granted were: Bachelor of Arts, Bachelor of Bible and Bachelor of Theology (Seminary). In 1956, the Seminary and the Bible College closed, and Northwestern Schools became Northwestern College. In 1970, Northwestern pur- chased a former Roman Catholic seminary campus in its present loca- tion. Classes began on the new campus in 1972. Campus buildings included Nazareth Hall (1921) and Riley Hall (1961). Emollment increased dramatically from 209 full time equivalent (FTE) students in 1972 to 1,547 in 2000 (1630 FTE in Fall 2003). As a result, several new buildings were added. They include: Moyer Residence Hall; Hartill/Knutson Residence Halls and Robertson Student Center (1980); Totino Fine Arts Center (1982); Berntsen Resource Center (1992); Ericksen Center (1996). For further historical perspective, refer to the excellent document titled, 'a cloud afwitnesses', that was prepared by the college for its 100th Anni- versary. NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIR NY ARCHITECTS P"AGE 2.1 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE OVERVIEW OF NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE IIlII Recent Changes Governance and Organization In 1989, there were three vice presidents, which included Academic Affairs, Administration and Auxiliary Services (which included radio ministry). Currently, there are four vice presidents, which are Aca- demic Affairs, College Administration, Development and Radio. Also, there is also an Assistant Vice President for Business and Finance. The academic organizational structure has changed from 6 divisions to twelve departments, thus allowing more specialization within disci- plines. Human Resources The student body has grown from 908 FTE in 1988 to 1,547 in 2000. This is a 70% increase over 12 years. (Note: Fall 2003 enrollment was 1630 average FTE.) Over the same 12 year period, faculty has increased from 45 full-time and 31 part-time members, to 82 full-time and 96 part-time in 2000. Catalogue says 69 FT and 28 PT Self Study says 70 FT and 50 PT in 1998. In 1989, 42% of faculty held terminal degrees, and in 2000, _ % of faculty held terminal degrees. Financial Resources In 1997, the Board of Trustees established the Northwestern Founda- tion, a separate 501 (c)3 corporation to secure, receive and manage gifts to Northwestern College and Radio. Physical Resources The Berntsen Resource Center was constructed in 1992, and the Erick- sen Center was constructed in 1996. Two existing apartment buildings adjacent to campus property were purchased for student residences: South Campus in 1992 and South- east Campus in 19988. Reynolds Field, a 10 acre outdoor athletic complex was built in 1997, and in 1997, 6 regulation tennis courts were built near the Ericksen Center. The Child Development Center was established in The Commons of EagleCrest Retirement Community (directly south of Lydia). In 1997 the Denier Art Gallery was completed in the Totino Fine Arts Center. CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 2.2 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE OVERVIEW OF NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE Ell Institutional Resources The Campus Technologjes Department has been reorganized, the campus has been wired for network access, number of computers has increased substantially, and support staff has been increased to reflect the increases. Academic Programs Two majors were combined, ten new majors were added, and eight minors were added. Majors that were added include: Art Education, Finance, International Business, Children's Ministries, Social Studies Education, English as a Second Language, Spanish, Biology and His- tory. In 1996, the Board of Trustees voted to convert to a semester based cal- endar, beginning in 1999. Non-Traditional Programs FOCUS and Center for Distance Education were established. FOCUS was designed to meet the needs of working students who have com- pleted approximately two years of college. Five majors are currently offered. The Center for Distance Education enables students to complete col- lege coursework for credit through instructional packets, audio tapes, video tapes and the Internet. Currently, one major is offered, Student Support Services In 1993, the ALPHA Center was established to provide services for stu- dents academically at risk, to assist students to meet their academic goals, and as a site for students who need alternative forms of testing. In 1993, the College established the office of Racial and Ethnic Diver- sity on Campus (REDOC) to create a mor/' supportive environment for diversity. In 1998, the College established the Disabilities Office of Support Ser- vices (DOSS) to better serve students with special needs. Northwestern College Radio Three additional stations have been added, including Sarasota, Florida; Madison, Wisconsin; and Arnold/Sacramento, California. Northwestern College's Market Position Northwestern College identifies itself as a private Christian College of the Bible, Art and Sciences, and Professional Education. It is a theo- logically conservative Christian college with a strong focus on integra- CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 2.3 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE OVERVIEW OF NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE IIIII tion of faith, learning and living within its educational programs and throughout the student's academic experience. The Board of Trustees, administration, faculty and students embrace an educational philos- ophy in which the arts and sciences and the disciplines are studied within the context of a biblically-based Christian worldview Northwestern Radio Network Northwestern College owns and operates a noncommercial network of Christian radio stations as an integral part of its total educational ministry. Northwestern College and Northwestern Radio Network are both governed by the same Board of Trustees and share facilities on the same campus. Both organizations operate with separate staffs and separate financial budgets and accounts. Northwestern Radio presents an image of Northwestern to the com- munities it serves. It reaches beyond the community to provide inspi- ration, instruction, spiritual growth, and service opportunities. Clearly, many people identify and familiarize themselves with Northwestern College via the Radio network. Moreover, it is notable that approxi- mately 90 percent of Northwestern students live in one of the College's listening areas. The first radio station within the network was KTIS, established in 1949 under the direction of Billy Graham. The network has increased to 14 AM and PM stations, and is part of a 250-affiliate satellite network. College's Organization Educational Departments and Programs Art & Graphic Design Art Graphic Design Biblical Studies Associate in Arts & Bible Certificate in Bible Accounting Finance General Business International Business Management Information Systems Marketing Broadcast & Electronic Media (B.5.) Broadcast & Electronic Media (Certif.) Communication Bible Business Administration Communication CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 2.4 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE OVERVIEW OF NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE IIlII Education Comm' cation Arts / Literature Education Early Childhood Education Elementary Education ESL Education Mathematics Education Music Education (B.M.E.) Physical Education Social Studies Education Visual Arts Education Kineisology English &Literature English Teach English as Second Language History &Related Fields History Modern Languages & Culture Spanish Music General Music (B.A.) Music Performance (B. Mus.) Psychology Psychology Social Science Science & Mathematics Biology Mathematics Mathematics / Engineering Dual Degree Pre-Engineering Alternative Education FOCUS Degree Distance Education Academic Support Library Academic Computing Academic Learning Assistance (ALPHA) Campus & Outreach Ministries Chapel Discipleship Ministries Christian Outreach Student Missions Fellowship Student Development Commuter Life Residence Life Health Service Northwestern Student Association Campus Services Dining Services Campus Store Career Development Center Counseling Services CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 2.5 OVERVIEW OF NORTHWESTER1\1 COLLEGE Ell Campus Activities Alumni Activities Intercollegiate Athletics Intramural Athletics Cheerleading Drama Arts Forensics Music Student Broadcasting Student Publications (The Northwestern Column and the Scroll) Auxiliary & Support Services Facilities Office College's Internal Relationships ~ .:::'" ~- - - - ~ !E"",,' ic>>_i ~ - ~=a =t'-. AcadomkAffalrs Advancement M..dia '" - - ,- - 01/3012003 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 2.6 OVERVIEW OF NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE IIiII Campus Population (Fall 2000) Average Age Full-time Equivalent (FTE) Students 20 Total Enrollment Total Men Total Women 1,547 1,568 609 959 Full-time Men Full-time Women 586 937 Part-time Men Part-time Women 23 22 Married Students Students Receiving Veterans' Benefits 46 14 Note: Enrollment is highest in adjacent states, and also in states where NWC Radio stations are located. Student Origins (Fall 2000) AZ 1 NM OK 1 AR 1 AK 4 HI 0 TX 6 LA 2 Foreign Students 44 Countries 23 NWC Radio Stations @ NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS &: SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 2.7 OVERVIEW OF NORlHWESTERN COLLEGE .. Campus Population Growth The continued growth of the student population at Northwestern Col- lege is a time of both excitement and concern for the College. The increase in population has allowed the College to reach a wider audi- ence in which to spread its word. On the other hand, the population is placing a burden on existing campus facilities, which are already beyond capacity. The College has a 1,600 average FIE (full-time equivalent) limit imposed by the City of Arden Hills. The College was at 1,547 FTE in the school year 2000-2001. Refer to the table below, 'Population Growth', and one can see the strong FTE growth curve (10.1 % over the last 5 years)). Note that the points of convergence indicate where there was a space short- age, and as a result, buildings were built to accommodate the popula- tion. (Note: As part of this planning process, it has been determined that the current site has the capacity for approximately 2,400 FTE.) There are significant decisions on the immediate horizon regarding FTE limitation. Enrollment will have to be limited if new facilities are not built to accommodate growth. How the College responds to this impending issue will affect the institution well into the future. Population Growth '." .. . i i I j- , I i ; ! i , i I Fa4u~ ' FT , .~ :'~" 350."" ~~ . -~ .;. .:. -, . . 300."" ~r- .. ".n1- I i "'.<XXI I I ~- I . 200.!XlO i 150,000 I i i I- 100.000 I- ",.<XXI ----C-' I.. .. o GSF '.400 i ~ --~ -1,1 I 1_.. ~='Jr' ~..' i I '1"- E'I ,. i _L-...t-,+"""'~,,,. f-- ~./ 'lg1:j Gf~S!~rl : ::.' 1\"'-- .--I.......i --- --" ---: :-;-'! ,- ~.-:~i ....~ . +, i Wi "'-, 51 de~i f E Canv 'l}eJ ce ifdic les I---;J#)~..F'- . I I I ,. .. , '.600 1.200 . . ,..,'_t! PJ!, '.<XXI .. 600 _jT~11" 400 j 200 0.- ,.... n n ,. ,. .. n '" '" ., '" "' eo 6< .. .. Of '" OJ II> ., '" "l .. '" '" " '" .. """ Q; <1/ '" -.""""'" ;m @ ;so "'" "" GiS "" "" "'2 <OJ .., ~, ." ... .., I 1m '6l ," ,p;,J; ',O'lO ,,,' u<> ur:; ',,",,, ,m ,Jm ''''' ',<to '.... I."", 'J'" I '-'iD -'-'" . .. " ~ ':1 50; '" '" " '" '" " .. '" r; J'$ or '" e$ .. .. '" "" 'O;! -+--+-~"'.""'"" lel./;n Ie',"", ,at.'ll ''''.m ''''.m "'.""1"".",, lalm ,Jar.,.,., '''.'''' '<o.""! <<l""!I,= '''',''''! =1""-""1 2<0,001 "'.tl:1 ,<t.O!! ''''-'''' '''''''' m.m:; m;mm,"" "'."""'-""1 JllUe> ""'.." :os..."I:<!'iJIl:> ""''''' m.1lil>1 NORTHWESTERN COLl.EGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SJRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 2.8 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE OVERVIEW OF NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE IIIII Campus Enrollment (Fall 2000) Enrollmenl by Major Men Women Total Accounting 11 12 23 Art 10 27 37 Biblical Studies 31 43 74 Biology 31 43 74 Broadcast & Electronic Media 23 12 35 Business,General/Business Admin 40 43 83 Children's Ministry 0 8 8 Christian Education 7 18 25 Communication 37 47 84 Intemational Business 7 10 17 Kineisology 18 21 39 Management - CIS Emphasis 1 1 2 Managemenl Information Systems 29 9 38 Marketing 15 11 26 Mathematics 8 7 15 Mathematics, Dual Degree 4 0 4 Mathematics Education 11 9 20 Ministries 7 11 18 Music, General 7 10 17 Visual Arts Education 2 16 18 Youth Ministries 41 28 69 AAB 3 7 10 AASB Broadcasl & Electronic Media 2 1 3 AASB Business Administration 1 0 1 AASB Office Technology 0 1 1 Certificate in Bible 0 0 0 Pre-Engineering 7 1 8 Undeclared 20 17 37 Special Student 1 3 4 Music Education Instrumental-Classroom 6 Vocal-Classroom 11 No Concentration 24 Music Performance Composition 1 Instrumental Performance 3 Piano Performance 6 Vocal Performance 12 No Concentration 7 Social Science Criminal Justice 29 Psychology 17 Sociology 1 History 2 CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 2.9 OVERVIEW OF NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE .. College's External Relationships The College has many relationships with organizations and institutions external to the College. It is important that these relationships are not pushed to the background. They can affect the academic opportuni- ties, public relations, accreditation and certifications and recruitment amongst many others. NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 2.10 II1JI Site Context NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAivJI'U5 MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY .\RCHITECTS PAGE 2.11 OVERVIEW OF NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE IIlII Land Use and Zoning The College is currently allowed to operate based on a Conditional Use Permit (RoseviIIe and Arden Hills). It would be desirable for the College to be in a fixed 'Institutional' zoning district, so that the governing factors of property use are set and not conditional. (Note: a Conditional Use Permit can be withdrawn at any time if conditions of the permit are not honored.) Also, the College property is located in two municipalities, RoseviIIe and Arden Hills. The fact that they are located in two cities can exac- erbate the College's ability to use the property to its best advantage. (To mitigate any potential problems the College may want to explore joint control with Roseville and Arden Hills.) From a big picture perspective, the long range viability of NWC should be examined in context of adjacent land use and increasing urban pressure on the College's site. Roseville Comprehensive Guide Plan Comprehensive Plan I=---I""-::=-- c~ ~_~~ F.bHl.-lIUH....' ~ -- "'--"''-''7~ ...19H............._P'-c-.OwNr "'" <>tar.I ....... . =-...... ...,.,...., ~'r'" _n>~,:z.<Sf""l"tt _......--.. -.on", l-\....'T.\.IL~ _ .. __ ~ = "'><a> -':"lW'~"". :2::~-:;::'-':.s::-- == = :::;:;: ~~;+.:;;-- '-~--'P""'''''''''''''''- N..........................., N""'--_ NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 2.12. NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE OVERVIEW OF NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE Ell ~ Parking iO(stribi.tion \c+ '0 \ ; I (~ ) /~~ :/-7'5", \'" ./11 ff '/:(0.:; '9:5,. \ /~$;~),o ~ '1 / ".(5' ~~\ ' -",,-- !tv 't .-~, I ~ \ \~ /, ~~ ,,'165;';,\ , ~I . "'Z(\-^"~~~\ I '9 11itV' ~3, I-/-~'\~;;~<X:( I J' \ \V~~j I I: j j I' / /i /;~ . I. / / CJtr~~~ I . pQ",,)CJ: ,; I' './ n ,nn '\' '~8 -to' /1- \.. '.., ,,"8.8 . {?f t! lV' \\ -.:;~--~--~ <051 (\ \). " n:--- ~\\\~ III ,I \ \ c "_0,,.\:\.'2< \\ \. ','.. 1'2f,,- ...._',J. .\~ ! ~ ~\\W:~ \ J~~V/""'/ ! i V".. i'''0~ ~-;r" 1:::,~;_::~~-,~~::=~,~~~~~~~,~ lJ-Io\ ~ c'1~T-1 i.'/I f i!.~t- 'l~ "II'" '/lL1" ~ ~~,~~"'-) i.lll/ f.~.~.~ u~O\ ~'!I!i !.io""l <('::\0.' Ifl' I" ..J, ~'\'\ I 1 !f- . \' i, " I '1;;::-"1 U.~tl)11 ril' :~rJ ~ f lr I il In :"'l~~ ii!!:i 'Qui ),?';'e i i:H i~' ( '(' //)1/1'111, ; ! (L.,. 'I' I' ~' . '':U~ " \1 /..n r-~'I"I\.. ../t_6 L_j U U\. ____ j ~ Parking is evenly dis- tributed on campus for the most part. How- ever, athletic events can tax parking stalls in vicinity of the athletic fields. CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 2.13 NWC Campus Technologies Departments Applications/Operations Database Operations Web Developmenl NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE OVERVIEW OF NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE Ell Existing College Computer Systems The Northwestern College Campus Technologies Departments work closely with individual users and campus departments to provide the technology services and infrastructure necessary to support the tech- nology and information needs of the Northwestern campus commu- nity. Northwestern's Campus Technology organization consists of the following five departments: L Information Technologies Department: provides campus networking and PC support 2. Academic Technologies Department: provides support to assist faculty utilize technology in the teaching/learning process. Vice President Academics / / / / / BRC (Library) Director ..',' , ' FacUlly Teaching/l:earning T~epnol~gy Coriiniittere Info Technology Infrastructure Team Te~hnology Stl~eririg Co~tfee PC Desktop Support Team "Technology- Zanet? Jrismu:tional, _. TedtriolOgy-C~tei' 3. Information Systems Department: provides solution support to campus departments such as accounting, student accounts, admis- sions, financial aid, advising, etc. 4, Telecommunications Department: provides campus telephone sup- port 5. Help Desk: provides one,stop source of referral and/ or help for tech- nology and telecommunications questions, issues, or problems. CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SJRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 2.14 OVERVIEW OF NORlHWESTERN COLLEGE .. :hwestem College Campus Buried Cabling (best estimate) . Spring, 1999 and prior ..~ ~Iljng Avenue - E ~--~ l~ --Fi_ _Fiba,in"tunnal - - oM _ _. _Cal:1e _______________ CablalV _ _ l'''''neCal>lelnaIllM''' __._____._ ..!<Si~ The above diagram is one of several that documents known telecomm connections and buried cable on campus. This map should only be used for general planning purposes. Once a project is more solidified, engineering and survey drawings should be used. Field verification is also a way of confirming locations. NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PACE 2.15 Existing Utilities This utilities map illustrates the major known utilities on campus. (See separate diagram for telecomm lines.) Tltis map should only be used for general planning purposes. Once a project is more solidified, engineer- ing and survey drawings and should be used. Field verification is also a way of confirrnlllglocations NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE OVERVIEW OF NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE .. ~ /..---"";-...-.-..... ..\ ('I, "~.",,-'-. ~",,-~:'"', ~~-~....~ '~'J ~:-:::.,1Y ~. - ~ I ;....,it }.-, , ~, -~"-....... ......... -\. '., / ",_./ 1 --- ,D.OO;~Gi-oohdl2lM'lU:it ~Un~illea~ ~u:nrr~ III ElRItk--!tkMB .1 /7':" - -----::-c.~c-.-~\\ i./< J, 'j \ 'I . \j i '1".",.\,;.; . t~}( {.:. LCS~~~~.~; - --',-------._,~.~--,.._'""'_.-'-'-_. -- -- iJ Ii ,''! "f--" ; i ,.=,,,""""._~-~.~.~._--,-,.,.'~t. CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 2.16 '~ NO.R:n-fW.ES.TERN COLLEGE. PLANNING ISSUES & ANALYSES IJII PLANNING CoNTiXT& ISSDES.A.NAL'Ysis EACILITIES.& GRl:JtIJ'!OSRELATEo ISSUES " . . . . - ACADEMIC PROGRAM ISSUES, . . , ", ACADEMIC AREA ASSIG)'lMENTSUNIMARY ,'.,ACADEMICPRO'-''RAM.SI'ACE ANALYSIS CAMPUS TECHNOLOGIES .ISSUES 'SrrECONimiAlNTS ". . C~MPUS "MASTER 'PLA~ , . PAR'INE!iS '. & _ siR-NY ARCHIT.E.CTS. :"SECTlO-N HI. PLANNING ISSUES & ANALYSES Ell edge for not only space issues, but also as some basic information for academic planning. Presentations with supporting documentation were made by Commit- tee members for the areas they represent. Also, Committee members were contacted for clarifications and additional information. As well, numerous follow-up contacts were made with staff and faculty to clar- ify issues. A key of major importance in establishing the non-physical scope of the study will be to develop the method of communicating issues and input to the planner, In order to obtain the widest possible user input into the planning process, the technique of issue analysis was be employed. Physical Context A Facilities Plan examines the current and future needs of the College in physical terms and it recommends a rational physical response to deal with those needs as they relate to the College's functions. Such a campus plan, however, would not be limited to the jurisdictional boundaries of the institution, Rather it would look at the broader con- text of the College's relationship to surrounding neighborhoods, to the city, indeed to the entire area the College serves. Physical planning for the College, therefore, considered a variety of geographic contexts and perspectives from the cities to the immediate built-up areas of the campus. The entire planning process in general, but the planning base inventory in particular, will utilize a variety of information to map the campus and its environs, This allows the vari- ous elements of the campus to be studied at appropriate levels and thus develop a coordinated perspective of the institution within the city and in relation to the "hinterland of the College." Non.Physical Context In addition to looking at the physical needs of the institution, it is neces- sary to identify issues and potential problems dealing with non-physi- cal concerns such as the administrative structure, the decision making process, finances, teaching methods, academic aspirations and relation- ships, social responsibilities, and the like. When investigating such non-physical areas as programm-ing, admin- istrative structure and decision making, only the "issues" can be iden- tified at this time. In other instances, however, such as in academic departmental relationships, specific recommendations can be formu- lated. NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & S}RNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 3.2 PLANNING ISSUES & ANALYSES IIiIII Campus - Wide Issues {Note; Interviews of faculty/staff by planning consultant were conducted in Spring 2001 Academic & Policy L Waiting lists have developed partially because of the school's limi- tations to accept more students. 2. It must be stressed that the College look at all issues in context of the College's Mission and long range institutional plan. 3. Space will limit total student enrollment, and not just in traditional day programs 4. Space will limit total student enrollment, and not just in traditional day programs Facilities & Grounds Related Issues Facilities 1. Students are receiving a quality education, although there are already some compromises due to space limitations. Space will limit total student enrollment. Space will affect course availability, including both day and evening time periods. 2. Establish an on-going, formal process to deal with future space needs and space requests. 3. "Squeeze" on class day hours available for maintenance and repair will further stress access time. Forces repair and replacement to holiday and summer periods; staff time off at holidays taxes issue; summer occupancy of dorms also taxes issue. 4. Biggest conflict is one academic need versus another academic need. 5. Unscheduled spaces are not available for emergencies. (Note: some institution's policies plan 2% of total space as "down" for remodel- ings, relocations, emergencies, etc.) 6. Use of Gold Room? Currently, total space is 1,535 ASF which is large enough for 2 classrooms; either split into two classrooms or re-furbish for use as small theatre. 7. Need for "Central Store" for bulk purchases, equipment reserves, dorm replacement items such as appliances, etc. Some standards propose 1-2% of ASF for a Central Store. 8. Although not a space/ square footage issue (does put square foot- age pressure due to avoidance of use), non-air conditioned spaces can be difficult to teach and learn in (especially in Summer School; also hard to sell to outside groups). Rooms include: Classroom N458 Gold Room (N222) Classroom RZOI (Continuing Ed) Nazareth Old Gym (all spaces) Classrooms R202, R20S and R206) Nazareth CllapeI Biology Lab N206 Guitar Studio (N388) Physics Lab N2I0 Voice Studio N464 Language Lab N416 Piano Studio N466 PC Computer Lab (N117, N119 and NI2I) Riley Gymnasimn (all) Youderian Lounge NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS &: SIR NY ARCHITECTS PAGE 3.3 PLANNING ISSUES & ANALYSES IIiIII 9. 'Institutional' level quality of building materials has an initially higher cost, but the true 'life cycle cost' reflects the true lower cost. (cavity wall construction, window construction meeting air infiltration standards, built-up roof standards, exterior ductwork insulation, indoor air quality; etc.) 10. There are some particularly significant code issues. Particularly egregious are existing corridors that should have the code required I-hour fire protection. Common air return in corridors (doors, air transfer, HVAC balance) is an especially acute problem. 11. Even small renovations will require meeting statutory require- ments which have associated costs (ex. asbestos abatement, sprin- kler systems, rated corridors, air exchanges, etc.). Grounds/Operational Services Further "squeezing" and extension of the school day will produce addi- tional stress on setup and cleaning time: a. "adult" seating takes more time to clean; less time during day. b. setup time availability. Ex. may need 6 people to set up in 20 minutes rather than 2 people over 60 minutes. c. Custodial space very short; especially for new, larger more effi- cient equipment; as well, IT has needed to take some of the space. (Note: Long Range Plan for IT integrated with other interests on campus?) d. Access to classrooms/labs for cleaning; overtime pay for off- hour times available for cleaning?; Few lounges on main campus proper places cleaning burden due to food in classrooms and labs; squeeze on day will further restrict cleaning access time. (Develop policy for food use in buildings?) Parking is tight for normal use by faculty, staff and visitors, as well as dorm students. Before re-active response of squeezing in one here and one there, need to look at overall impact of adding parking spaces. (Long range campus FTE capacity, site capacity, future buildings if any, aesthetics as part of campus life, etc.) May have to institute parking restrictions (many options for classes of restrictions). Parking issue makes access for snow plowing difficult. Athletic and special events are a particularly difficult problem (student dorm parking, alumni back on campus, invited guests, etc.). Deferred Maintenance Plan A cursory review of the College's Deferred Maintenance Plan was per- formed. In general, the report was well done, but predominantly engi- neering oriented. The report should be tempered with an architectural perspective to maintain architectural integrity of campus. Comments included the following: 1. Asbestos allowance seems quite low 2, No mention of rated corridor reqmts. Ex: Riley at Pres office. 3. Interior architectural finishes and materials should be consistent with the image and quality of the college. NWC needs balance NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 3.4 PLANNING ISSUES & ANALYSES lID appropriate materials in conjunction with costs, both front end and long term. 4. How does workplan account for inflation? Events Services 1 Difficult to meet all needs due to availability pressure from many differ- ent interests on campus. 2 Pressure from academic needs versus music performances and special events; is there need to re-assess goals and objectives for potential con- flicts as they relate to academic mission and ministry/outreach mis- sion? Academic Program Issues 1. A limit on enrollment has been established due to existing facilities capacity. 2. Current demographics indicate that traditional college age students are peaking within the next 2 or 3 years. How will this affect the enrollment increases that NWC has been experiencing over the last 5 to 10 years? By Department I Art & Graphic Design 1. Faculty: 3 FT and 4 PT 2. Have 56 Art majors this year, normally plan for 40-45; have 94 in Art Appreciation, prefer 48. 3. Art Department enrollment has increased from 41 students in 1990 to 57 students in 1995, and 130 students in 2000. (a 217% increase over 10 years, and a 128% increase over the last 5 years) How long will this last. 3. Feeling pinch for space in current Totino fine Arts Building areas. (Space was built in 1982 when college was 700 total students.) Too many classes in one space 4. In temporary space, no investment in safety, equipment, air quality. Air quality a major concern due to art processes. Examples: air quality in printmaking; concern for open flame with wood structure; bronze pours in parking lot (seasonal weather and restrictions). 5. Discussed Nazareth Gym space conversion as permanent solution (cur- rent temporary home) into two levels of instructional space. Upper level could make nice art spaces due to large volume and daylight. Could hold: a) Sculpture/3-D Design Studio, b) Kiln/Foundry Room, and c) Drawing/2-D Design Studio. 6. Students complain difficult to set up projects for long enough periods of time. 7. Students perceive that the College's view on its instructional facilities is a reflection of how the College feels about its students. NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SJRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 3.5 Bible I. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Business & Accounting 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Christian Education 1. 2. Theatre I. 2. 3. NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE PLANNING ISSUES & ANALYSES II:im Faculty 10 FT, 3 IT in department; 10,12 adjunct; 5-6 work study. Integrating core for all academic disciplines: "Hub", Storage: articles, computer hardware, most offices have closets. Oassroom presentations mostly 'Power Point" type; some over- head. Large classrooms hard to come by; need space for 40-50; 30 sections of Freshman, 10 upper division. Goal for Bible languages is 20-25 students / 6 workstations, especially in Language. Pedagogy: straight ahead lecture one of several methods. Currently 225 students; expect 250 in next 5-10 years. Second larg- est department. Feels pinch for classrooms. (This is part of total campus aggregate need for generic classrooms.) Feels need for one computer lab, If student population increases to 250, would need one more full- time faculty and office. Department Head needs administrative assistant; area for same. Intro to Marketing class for 50 people in very poor classroom, but only once every semester or so. Currently 4 faculty, will add 2. Field experience - need to add one administrative assistant Further pressure if Theatre minor / major ever offered; synergy with Music programs? Maranatha operations? Several year calendar for Maranatha events must be meshed with Theatre academic needs. Need to balance academic needs with event needs - integration of two entities? Continue to assess conflicts between Theatre instruc- tional lab needs versus Maranatha performance needs. (schedules, set up times required for different types of events, type of person- nel, student workers, etc.). Pressure for building stage sets and the- atre students' practice time are in opposition to "road house" style operation of Maranatha, 4. Need for Rehearsal Hall (teaching space). 5. Conflict of training and education between Theatre Department trained stage personnel and Maranatha trained personnel. If The- atre were to become minor, could Theatre department train Mara- natha personnel? 6, Theatre Scenery Workshop /Storage out-building. It seems that this does not totally solve Maranatha conflict - need for co-location of stage sets and rehearsal time. (Separate issues? Provides instruc- tional lab for teaching stage set building, but duplication of efforts? Confirm issues.) 7. Planning for types of scenery: permanent (less flexible and less expensive), temporary, movable/reps (more flexible, but more CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SJRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 3.6 PLANNING ISSUES & ANALYSES .. timely to plan and more expensive), etc. How to budget? 8. Concern over equipment purchase expense and quality between Theatre Department versus Maranatha; coordinate equipment pur- chases. Communication L Population: 130 students 10 FT faculty 3+ adjunct faculty 2. Critical needs: a. WVOE has no instructional lab for teaching radio lab; space used is substandard and undersized; consideration for re-use of current Radio Station space since technology, sound-proofing is in place. (Note: Former KTIS subsequently converted to aca- demic offices.) b. Need Lab/ demo classroom with technology_ c. Need lab/ resources forComm Tech/Web Design; combine with Journalism, Web, Dig Video, etc.; workshops for Column, Scroll, web, etc. Child Development 1. Space is way too small for function as child care center and instruc- tional lab space. 2. State guidelines presoipt SF per child, but do not make allowances for use as Lab setting for Child Development educational program (student teachers) at same time. Note that the 35 SF requirement is extremely tight to begin with, let alone adding student teachers and faculty. 3 Currently, 6 students enrolled in program, with 21 students expected next year. They need space to prepare activities, meet/ converse with faculty, have faculty observe students in action, store personal effects, etc. 4. Requests made by Program include the following: Conference space (students, staff, parents), small group space (children/ grandfriend), teacher planning space, Intergenerational Coordinator's Office and Director's Office. 5. Current space consists of 1,252 ASF for child care spaces and 297 ASF for offices. State Department of Health requires 35 SF per child (not including office space, miscellaneous spaces, cabinets, tables, etc.), The center is licensed for 38 students (12 toddlers and 26 pre,school). (Overload of 42 children requires use of Center's Parlor for which there is no formal arrangement according to center staff.) (NOTE: Calculations indicate that current space does not meet Board of Health rules: 35 SF x 38 students = 1,330 SF. Only 1,252 SF available per NWC space inventory. Need to verify.) 6. Currently, lack of Office space compromises operation. Main Office which is designed for 2 people is used by 4-5 people. Also, seven teachers using equivalent of a "wide window sill" in narrow aisle storage area as office space. NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS &. SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 3.7 PLANNING ISSUES & ANALYSES lID 7. Note: Classroom space for the Child Development Educational Pro- gram is on main campus, 8, Discussed aspect of Child Care use by non-NWC parents is actually a form of the College's ministry and outreach, 9. Note that State Licensirig laws have changed, where previously 'Birth through Grade 3' was not part of Child Development. This will affect student's educational program, which will likely have significant space impacts. 10, There is a desire to also accept Infants at the Center so that student will receive full-spectrum of chilled development. Lack of space currently prohibits this. 11. Discussed possibility of moving Child Development Lab into Radio Building when constructed. Lab would still be close to inter-gener- ational facilities at Presbyterian Homes. Education 1. Health Education potential future major? (currently Minor: licens- ing at State level) How would it affect 2400 FTE limit? Where would space be available? Kinesiology only program not leading to licensing. 2. Fall 2000 FTE = 461 and Fall 2005 projections indicate 525. What does this do to 1,600 FTE campus max? 3. Adding two faculty next year; adding one office person. 4. Need for large group meeting spaces in Spring when Student Teach- ers meet as group; 65-70 students; not formal lecture - need layout space (portfolios, etc.). Frequency? Blue Room a potential? 5. Elementary Art going to two sections; desire to meet in Art area; need computer lab, 6. Dedicated computer lab; Tech Lab uses Mac Lab; content specific; dedicated software; CD-ROM tower. 7, State of Minnesota records filing requirements up to 10 years; verify time period; may be a storage equipment issue. S. Need access to records for Student Teaching documentation. 9. Confidentially an issue when Work Study are in Work Room. 10. Methods courses need ''Demo Classroom" or Seminar type space; "dedicated classroom' for work materials,; need Web access; could be combined with ESL which also needs materials in dedicated classroom. 11. Music Ed puts pressure on Music Department's MIDl Lab; practice rooms also. English 1. Office space a premium; need 1 FT and 1 PT. 2, Classrooms space shortage. 3. Expressed need for large classroom for department chapel or whole department events. (Policy development needs to review this issue within context of whole campus.) 4. Transfer classes increasing in size from 6 up to 12 - no longer can meet in faculty office. (The need for small classrooms appears else- NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SlRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 3.8 PLANNING ISSUES & ANALYSES IIIiII where on campus.) 5. Parking after 10 AM a problem for supervising student teachers. 6. Issue of furniture types used; reinforces need to develop standard of some sort, but with flexibility for educational delivery methods and teaching styles. History 1. History, Geography, Political Science, Economics (also includes edu- cation majors). 2. Faculty 2 FT, 3 PT; add 1 FT next year; 1 work study per faculty (shares space in faculty office). 3. Standard class: upper division = 15-20 (up to 40 max.); senior semi- nar 15-16. Languages L Faculty 1 FT Director, 1 FT Spanish, and 4 adjunct 2. Department is smallest on campus, but only 5 years old. 3. Desire to co,locate all spaces (N458, N412, N460) 4. Class size limits: 24 lower level, 12 upper level. 5. Furniture is hodge'podge (due to space shortage?); desire fixed fur- niture (not grouping - "can't teach a duck to quack in a group"). 6. Desires dedicated "classroom"; need for maps, cultural artifacts, etc. 7_ Need for popular culture class; "work" language, not "study". Music (also Maranatha activities) L A Classroom for 10-12 students for upper level courses would be helpful, in that large classrooms would then not unnecessarily tied up for small size classes. (The need for small classrooms appears elsewhere on campus.) 2. Inappropriate use of Band/ Choir Rooms for lecture classes. Stu- dents must use lap boards. Use of specialty Music as classrooms ties up space for use as lab. 3. It appears that the department is short roughly 5 - 8 practice rooms. 4. Instrument storage space is marginal. 5. Shortage of rehearsal space necessitates use of Nazareth Chapel for ensemble rehearsals. 6. Need was expressed for drama stage setup as instructional lab for theatre students (3-5 weeks); confIictswith Maranatha single per- formance events. Conflicts would increase if/when Theatre Minor ever offered. 7. Shortage of office space. (Music, Art, Communication) Note that Music faculty teaches private lessons in their offices. Need for roughly 6 -10 additional offices based on current loads. Currently, one Music Faculty using Wenger practice module as office. (Note: Office space here, as well as everywhere else on campus, must be reviewed as total campus need due to high Office ASF to FTE ratio.) 8. No Conference Room or Lounge. (Faculty meetings in Classrooms. NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SlRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 3.9 PLANNING ISSUES & ANALYSES IIlIII Wedding planning client meetings in corridors) 9. Main Music Office appears crowded. Warrants consideration for expansion and/ or remodeling into more efficient layout. 10, Report by Dr. Jack Schwarz (in anticipation of National Associa- tion Schools of Music visit) raises significant criticism for crowding. Both space size and quality are listed as major challenges that affect quality of Music program. Also lists need for higher quality prac- tice room instruments, which will add to space need. Dr. Harold Best also expresses similar concerns in his report for the 2002 NASM visit) 11. Note that Academy of Music adds to total space demand with instruction provided to 309 pre-college students. (Note: 2:30 - 5:30 PM period) Psychology 1, Includes Psychology, Social Science, Criminal Justice, Sociology and Anthropology. 2. Currently 3 faculty, will add 1 now, and 1 later, 3. No major issues. 4. Need Psych Lab with two-way mirror for observation. 5. Considering adding Child Psychology Minor, then Major. 6. Identity an issue; no "home" for psych major. Science & Mathematics 1. 57 majors 2. Faculty 7 FT; add 2 FT next year; 1 FT lab tech; 5 adjunct faculty. 3. Currently 12 lab section,S gen ed sections 4. Biology (75 students) has one small lab 935 SF plus prep room of 155 SF = 1,090 SF. At 50-60 ASF / Sta norm, this projects to a capacity of 18 stations, when actually 24 stations (verify qty.) are currently filled per section; would normally project 1,200 ASF - 1,440 ASF for 24 stations. 5. Chemistry (31 students) lab to be remodeled; existing space is 24'-0" x 37'-10" which equals 908 ASF. Sections will have 24 stations. Norm is 50-80 ASF /Sta, so 24 stations require 1,200 ASF - 1,920 ASF. 6. Pre-Engineering (12 students) 7. Physics/Geology use 40,60 ASF /Sta Floor is in poor shape. 8. Short of storage space. 9. Long term proposal for two new programs: Biochemistry and Biol- ogy Education major (grades 6-12). Would need one more lab. ALPHA Center 1. New need for adults increasing dramatically. 2. With one large Testing Room, other space issues appear to be layout/ equipment or re-allocation issues. (Review in more detail as an architectural programming effort.) 3. Consider potential for small DOSS tutoring room. NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIR NY ARCHITECTS PAGE 3.10 PLANNING ISSUES & ANALYSES IIiIII 4. Meeting in BRC Study Room is difficult to oversee and transport materials. Also, takes space out of use for Library. 5. Contact hours = Writing Tutoring: 732 writing tutorials @ 0.5 hour each = 366 hours per semester"'" 15 weeks = 25 WSCH average (not peak loads) Other-Subject Tutoring: 112 tutorials @ 0.5 hour each ~ 56 hours per semester "'" 15 weeks = 4 WSCH DOSS Referrals: 4 tutorials for first quad (max.) FOCUS/Pathways L Student population: Spring 99 132 (first year) Spring 00 350 Fall 01 400 Average class size is 12-15. (The need for small classrooms appears elsewhere on campus.) , Maximum number of groups is 33 starting at one time. Three need computer labs; remainder need classroom space. Only 27 true class- rooms exist on campus. (Does not include 'Personal Enrichment' classes.) Need for classrooms exceeds capacity. 2. Masters Program to be started. Where will its classes meet if Oass- room space already tight? 3. Short-term solution is to rent space off campus, 4. Need for" adult" furniture; have had complaints. NOTE: If change is to be made, then "Furniture Standards" should be initiated. Furniture size and shape can drastically affect classroomllab station capacity. Inappropriate furniture selection can drasticallv reduce room capacity by up 10 25-35%. (This applies to the entire campus.) 5_ FOCUS/Pathways not aligned with conventional school year start/ end. Scheduling alignment should be reviewed for potential con- flicts aggravating space need, (Institutional policy issue?) 6. Need for conference space expressed due to much one-on-one dis- cussions. 7. Impact of central filing versus individual filing should be reviewed by administrator, (Duplication has a SF impact.) Personal Enrichment 1. Feel space pinch. 2. Confined to 10 rooms, one night a week. 3, Was running 16 different courses comfortably, but now down to 10. Would like to run more. 4. Conflict with FOCUS /Pathways need for evening classroom space. Meet in Lab space if appropriate and available? Summer School 1. Mostly quality of space issue. 2. Non-air conditioned classrooms used when others have priorities. 3. Wired classrooms not always available when "outside" groups pay NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 3.11 PLANNING ISSUES & ANALYSES Ell for wired classrooms. Would use of portable projection units solve problem? 4, Events Services has priority when events are planned out years ahead. Distance Education 1. Full time staff = 6, 1 Director Assistant Director: Recruitment and marketing Instructional Designer: Distance Ed based (desk top work) Associate Instructional Designer: Distance Ed based (desk top work) Student Relations Coordinator: student contact during programs; contact with faculty; order books + academic materials Administrative Assistant: basic needs Office Assistant: basic needs 2. 1,000 - 1,100 course enrollments 3. Markets: Adult, high school PSEO, traditional age 4. Same course numbers and course length as traditional programs Ties into individual ed. depts. 5. Delivered via print, video and internet - 85% via paper All produced on campus Graduate programs would be non-traditionally delivered 6. Storage: "Just-in-time" supplies coursework, books, etc. 7. Video production a space need Campus & Extension Ministries 1. Will be moving to N389, 391 and 393. 2. Two Directors, Coordinator, Office Manager, Staff and work study 3. Numerous events on and off campus; storage for displays and materials. 4. Some small group meetings on campus. 5. Wednesday "Edge" program breaks down into small groups. Registrar 1. Needs to be located directly adjacent to Admissions and Financial Aid due to working relationships. 2. Space concerns appear to result mostly due to space layout and equipment issues. (Note: effective layout may not solve all space problems.) Assess cost of new equipment (highly effective, custom- ized work stations) against major remodeling. Equipment can be reconfigured multiple times more easily. 3. Need to handle a multitude of information media intensifies space need. (electronic data, hard copy data, hard copy signatures [Fed loans, etc.], mail, etc.) Need to handle "semi-accessible" (not ready for archive storage) records an issue. 4. More storage space (or more efficient storage space?) desired. Con- sider 'Compact Storage' as part of solution? (Note: building floor loads have to be calculated by licensed Structural Engineer due to highly concentrated loads of compact storage.) NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIR NY ARCHITECTS PAGE ~.12 PLANNING ISSUES & ANALYSES IIlDI Admissions .1. "Front Door" to College for prospective students. Layout with split functions adds to ambiguity, Narrow space block available aggra- vates potential layout, 2. Consider consolidation of "Student/Support Services" into single area for "One Stop Shopping"; needs to be near Admin; could add to visibility to all commonly located entities; may see efficiency of staff; vacated Radio Station space? Accessibility could be an issue. 3. Space concerns appear to result mostly due to space layout and equipment issues; effective layout may not solve all space prob- lems. Assess cost of new equipment (highly effective, customized work stations) against major remodeling. Equipment can be relo. cated multiple times more easily. 4. Need to handle a multitude of information media intensifies space need, (electronic data, hard copy data, hard copy signatures [Fed loans, etc.], mail, etc.) Need to handle "semi-accessible" (not ready for archive storage) records an issue. 5. More storage space (or more efficient storage space?) desired. Con- sider 'Compact Storage' as part of solution? Financial Aid I. No major issues; not ideal, but could be improved. 2. Some cubicles are quite small for specific job functions; some staff should be in enclosed space. (confidentiality) 3. Storage on 3rd floor; storage requirements are now 3 years instead of previous 5 year, 4. Waiting area currently seats 3, could use 5 (peak is 6-8). 5. Discussed desire for co-locating Student Accounts, Admissions, Stu- dent Records and Financial Aid; could use common work study. Career Development 1. Staff: Director Employer Relations Specialist Office Manager Work Study (2@one time; total 3) (secure personal items storage) Academic Affairs Internship Coordinator (to be added) 2. Current space size is roughly IS x 25 (510 SF) Storage upstairs in attic (7 x 15:t) used for grad school booklets, handouts, etc. Access 1- 3 times per day (???) 3. Equipment: TV /VCR (needs clear viewing angle) Projector Photocopy machine Color laser printer Scanner Fax machine Office supplies cabinet 4. Space is tight; student access limited to 15 hours a week; otherwise students must go to Library, then CD staff unable to advise. NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 3.13 Counseling L 2, 3. 4. Alumni 1. 2. 3. 4. PLANNING ISSUES & ANALYSES IIlIII 5. Workshops performed in this area; tightness affects ability to make optimum presentations; when workshop in session, shuts down other activities. 6. Need to separate staff functions from student activities. 7. Every last bit of space used, but more effective room configuration would provide better internal room layout and more functional. Staff 1 FT, 2 0.25 PT Desire 3rd PT due to FTE increase; served 22% of population.; norm is 16% at Christian Colleges. Limited to 10-15 sessions due to facilities limitations. Peak times for student need: post-holiday, before finals and before / around end of school year. Location, location, location! Confidentiality an issue with work study and others. Need for institutional policy for conference room quantity, location and avail- ability? Consolidate with other areas? Gift Planning, PR, Alumni all together? Strong desire to be in Nazareth near traffic. Gift Planning 1. Surplus of space 2. Consolidate with other areas? Gift Planning, PR, Alumni all together? Public Relations 1. Currently using 5.5 offices with 6.5 staff; will increase to 8.0. 2. High traffic area with outside vendors. 3. Network wiring important; 600-700 print projects a year. 4. Total area could use conference room. 5. Consolidate with other areas? Gift Planning, PR, Alumni all together? Athletics 1. Concern if Riley Gym is converted to classroom and lab space. Pressure of scheduling, availability and maintenance, 2. Parking a problem for events; location, not quantity. Could some spaces be "open" for games; roughly 500 people attend football games. 3. Viewing Room too small for teams; too big for coaches; "right-siz- ing" of facilities. 4. Riley Gym primarily intramural and softball/baseball practice; 39 events scheduled. 5. Currently rent to church groups on weekends; closing Riley may preclude this; is this a policy issue? Outreach? 6. Concessions clean, but no water; would like to replace, but... 7. Concerns about use of outdoor fields; football practice on baseball field; wear and tear; artificial turf a solution since natural turf does not have enough time to re-establish itself. NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 3.14 PLANNING ISSUES & ANALYSES .. 8. Re-arrange fields? 9. Soccer and track at other locations off campus. 10. Weight Room tight; would like to be Fitness Center; space require- ments more for Fitness Center. Student Life L Four Deans: Dean of Students Associate Dean of Student Life & Internships Associate Dean Commuter Life Associate Dean Residence Life 2. Health Center; space OK; recently remodeled. 3. Dorm classrooms and lounges have been accounted for in space cales. 4. Student Government office in Nazareth; office spaces adequate; Main Office tight, especially storage (student files, forms, records, College publications such as Pipeline, Column, academic publica- tions, etc. Business & Finance 1. Finance: Vp, Admin Asst, Financial / Budget Analyst 2. Human Resources: Director, HR Asst, Recruitment Specialist, Ben- efits Specialist, Student Employment Specialist, Office Asst, Trainer (future) 3, College Receptionist 4. Purchasing: Manager, Purchasing Asst 5. Business: Mgr Accounting Ops, Business Office Supervisor, Staff Accountant, Payroll Coord/Staff Accountant, Cashier, Student Accounts Coord, Lead Coord Gift Receipting, Gift Receipting Coord, Gift Receipting/ Accts Payable, Accts Payable Coord, Gift Receipt- ing Student Worker 6, General Use Work Station 7. Discussed academic versus financial impact of delaying lap top computer labs until wireless is more dependable in next 2 - 3 years. (Wiring costs, furniture costs, computer support costs, etc.) 8, Consider 'Compact Storage" for some records? Campus Technologies L Includes: Info Services Info Technology Telecom Academic Technology Help Desk 2. Needs expressed: Conference Room, Training/ Classroom, Office for future position, Work bench area for PC's, storage for dead materials (for re-use). 3. Consolidation and proper equipment/work surfaces/storage sys- tems could help resolve some issues, = NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 3_15 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE PLANNING ISSUES & ANALYSES IIIiII Academic Area Assignment Summary %of Assignable Square Footage Use (ASF) ASF SF/FTE Total ASF Inslruclional Space Art & Graphic Design 7,659 4.79 2.99% Bible 1,351 0.84 0.53% Business Administration 2,700 1.69 1.06% Christian Ministries 893 0.56 0.35% Communication 7,138 4,46 2.79% Education 4,266 2.67 1.67% English & Literature 1,524 0.95 0.60% History and Related Fields 533 0.33 0.21% Modern Languages & Culture 1,391 0.87 0.54% Music 8,985 5.62 3.51% Psychology 898 0.56 0.35% Science & Math 4,845 3,03 1.89% Generic Classroom 20,878 13.05 8.16% Subtotal 63,059 39.41 24.66% Non.lnslruclional Space Distance Education 2,104 1.32 0.82% Student Support 1,244 0.78 0.49% Student Services 8,665 5.42 3.39% Business Offices 7,529 4.71 2.94% Lounge 8,426 5.27 329% Misc 720 0.45 028% Academic Support 1,418 0.89 0.55% Library / Study Spaces 22,169 13.86 8,67% Media Services 1,004 0.63 0.39% Administrative 2,640 1.65 1.03% Auxilliary Services 19,446 12,15 7.60 Campus Technology 26,745 16.72 10.46% Meeting Rooms 5,734 3.58 224% Athletics 36,723 22.95 14.36% Radio (KTIS) 5,328 3.33 2.08% Sublatal 121,205 93.68 58.61 % CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PAGE 3.16 PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE PLANNING ISSUES & ANALYSES IIJDI Academic Program Space Analysis A space utilization study was performed in Spring of 2001, and although various spaces around campus have been reconfigured, the major space issues still exist. An overview of the report's findings are outlined below, and if further detail is needed, refer to the space study document. Summary The continued growth at Northwestern College is a time of both excitement and concern for the ColIege. After just a short time on campus, it was evident both in interviews and initial observations that: . There is a high level of dedication and earnestness among staff and faculty . There are concerted efforts to work within the constraints of the existing facilities After further in-depth investigation and data analysis, it was clear that: 1 Space will affect course availability, including day and evening time periods 2 Space will limit total student enrollment, and not just in traditional day programs 3 Students are receiving a quality education, although there are already some compromises due to space limitations 4 Space limitations include areas that a) need better spatial organiza- tion to achieve more efficient use of available space, b) exhibit inappropriate use of specific space type, and c) are simply short of raw square footage. True to the College's mission, people are working in a cooperative effort for the common good of the College. However, at some point, space need conflicts become overwhelming, and operations become compromised. Integrated Perspeclive To understand the space utilization issues at Northwestern College, it must be looked at from a total perspective, integrating academic, financial and operational needs. The Mission of Northwestern Col- lege emphasizes the quality of student life. The College's Campus Life Objectives state: Northwestern attempts to provide an environment of wholesome living, aesthetic enjoyment, relationship building, social and cultural CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 3.17 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE PLANNING ISSUES & ANALYSES Ell opportunity, and athletic and recreational activity. To enhance student life on campus, numerous activities and opportu- nities are offered to the student. Blocks of time must be available on an organized basis for maximum number of students to participate, i.e., the co-curricular hours of 3 PM - 5PM. Approach Two methods were used to analyze and assess square footage utiliza- tion on Northwestern College's campus. They include: 1. National norms and industry organization standards 2. Comparative use with other colleges Two calculation techniques were used to determine square footage demand. They are based on: 1. Square foot per Weekly Student Contact Hour (WSCH). Factors include contact hours, type and size of space needed per student in each specific type of class, and desired use pattern of space, 2. Square foot per student Full Time Equivalent (FTE). Factors include student population, staff and faculty population, func- tional categories, and minimum" core" for specific functional cat- egories, The "Desired Use Pattern" factors used for analysis on Northwestern College campus adjusted national standards to fit Northwestern's specific operations. Operational assumptions include: o 7:30 AM - 3:30 PM school day for traditional programs 3:30 - 5:30 PM for Co-curricular programs Chapel uses 30 minutes per day plus travel time (55 minutes total) o o Qualitalive Issues 1 Due to the shortage of classroom and lab space, there is inap- propriate space use for some classes. Also, in FOCUS/Pathways there is a shortage of space, and "substitute" classroom space is used to meet space demand. 2 Classrooms lag in technological capabilities. Updating with cur- rent day equipment is necessary to be competitive in today's market. However, it may be financially advantageous to not wire laptop classrooms/labs, and wait 2-3 years until mainstream wire- less technology is available. CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 3.18 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE PLANNING ISSUES & ANALYSES lID 3 Faculty Offices are at a premium: A faculty member offices in a 'Wenger' Practice Module. Faculty retention is more difficult when faced with this type of space problem. 4 Lecture classes are being held in the Choir and Band Room - students need to use lap boards to take notes. As a result, quality of education suffers. 5 Since Art is a visual discipline, condition of the Art Lab in former Nazareth Gym makes a statement on the quality of the education delivered to Art students (regardless of faculty dedication, etc,). Also, it is not consistent with the College's Mission. 6 Campus Life Objectives (quality of campus life issue) add to square footage demands, often in ways not immediately apparent. 7 Ministry functions support the College's Mission: a Space use must acknowledge ministry functions in some way. b Many of the ministry functions add space demand not found on many campuses c Extent of music (academic program, ministry, outside events, private lessons, etc.) d events (demand for Maranatha Hall use by both academics and outside events) e Radio needs (academic and ministry) f Child Care (academic and ministry) 8 There are many variables in assessing space requirements on college campuses. Each campus has its own personality. For all campuses, the following make an impact on space: Mission Objectives Policies Educational methods, goals Quanlilative Issues 100 Classrooms At capacity, even after expanding day by one hour over current day, Classroom space is short by 5,300 Assignable Square Feet. Currently, classroom lectures are being delivered in inappropriate spaces and affecting quality of education. Example: lectures are given in Band and Choir Rooms and require students to take notes on lap boards. 200 Labs At capacity, even after expanding day by one hour over current day, Laboratory space is short by 5,890 Assignable Square Feet. CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 3.19 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE PLANNING ISSUES & ANALYSES Ell Space shortage in Labs is affecting quality of education. Example: Chemistry Lab is typically programmed at 60-80 ASF per student station. At 70 ASF / station, the chemistry lab should be roughly 1,680 ASF (lab and prep). The current lab consists of 931 ASE Either the lab must be remodeled to be bigger, or additional faculty will be needed. Both Biology and Physics/ Geology Labs have similar constraints.) 300 Offices Allocation per station is significantly larger than standards Quantity of offices in short supply Office location is an issue as to availability for staff versus faculty 400 library At calculated capacity (Note: 20 year collection growth projected in 1991) 500 Special Use Gymnasium Including Riley Gym, larger than standards for similar size college. Meets various national standards even if Riley Gym converted to classroom Wide variation in standards - size more a matter of institutional policy 600 General Use Assembly Larger than standards for similar size college, Wide variation in standards - size more a matter of institutional policy Size appears necessary to meet college's needs in relation to overall Mission Food Service Food service area calculations indicate a shortage of approximately 1,500 to 2,000 ASE Kitchen, preparation and serving space are rela- tively adequate, although the serving area can be tight at times. The Dining Area is short approximately 1,000 to 1,500 ASF, and is evident by observation of daily crowding between 11:00 AM and 12:00 PM. Adding to the crowding problem in the Dining area is that Chapel releases just prior to lunch time. Depending on College desires, poli- cies and operations, scheduling of Chapel at a time not so close to the lunch hour would likely relieve some crowding in the Dining area. This would provide more time to spread out lunch time for diners, thus reducing peak loads and the need for more space. Bookstore Currently, the Bookstore has 1,260 ASF, and for a college of 1,500 FTE, a bookstore operation would be expected to occupy 1,800 - 2,400 ASE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SJRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 3.20 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE PLANNING ISSUES & ANALYSES IIIDI Lounges Student Lounge space totals 12,085 on campus proper. (This total includes Main Dorm Lounges at 10,257 ASF, but excludes off-campus dorms). This equates to 4.5 percent. Although adequate total square footage of lounge space is provided, it would be desirable to have a higher percentage of the total Lounge space distributed in academic buildings on main campus rather than the largest amount of it in Main Dorm. 700 Support Space Within standards Evening Hours FOCUS/Pathways and Personal Enrichment There is a distinct shortage of classrooms in the evening hours. (Lab space is not a problem.) The Fall 2001 schedule calls for 33 FOCUS / Pathways classes to begin at one time, when there are only 27 true classrooms on campus. 1f a Masters program is started, space issue is further aggravated, Hours of Operation School day is currently 8 AM - 3 PM. Study was performed on 7:30 AM - 3:30 PM basis. Even with additional hour included in calculations, campus is still tight for instructional space. 1f school day were pushed further into the afternoon, several issues become more prevalent: . Less down time for classroom setups and re-arranging for instruc- tor needs . Time slots for cleaning and maintenance are becoming shorter and shorter (evening class hours, Saturday classes, summer dorm occupancy, etc.) . Overtime wages for support personnel at odd hours . Ability to "sell" credit hours at less suitable hours in the day (student life, student study time, student jobs, faculty availability, etc.) Classroom Sizes Need for 12-15 station size classroom is evident in many academic programs. Space Use Recommendations 1 Continue to refine the College's Space lnventory so that a) on- going space inventory is accurate, b) comparisons with standards and similar institutions reflect parallel data, and c) resulting assessments are meaningful. CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SlRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 3.21 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE PLANNING ISSUES &. ANALYSES IIiiII 2 Update space demand on a regular basis in parallel with academic curriculum and programming. Assess true needs quantitatively, but with consideration for Northwestern College's specific educa- tional delivery methods, mission, goals and objectives, etc. 3 Continue investigation of space use at higher education institu- tions with comparable mission and goals. 4 Establish an on-going, formal process to deal with future space needs and space requests. (Perhaps appoint a standing space evaluation committee.) Also, develop a policy for evaluating space requests, generally in the priority order listed below: a. evaluate space needs based on standards b. achieve higher utilization of existing space (currently achieved) c. relocate functions (better flow, more appropriate room size, etc.) d. re-allocate existing spacers) e. renovate existing spaces for more effective function f. remodel existing spaces g. expand existing building with new construction 5 Develop a space use model that incorporates standards for station sizes, use expectancy, furniture standards, scheduling priorities, etc. 6 Continue to recognize Northwestern College's unique Mission as it affects facilities needs and use. All decisions must be "tested" against the Mission. 7 Develop integrated Institutional Master Plan that correlates aca- demic and financial needs and capabilities with facilities issues. All three entities are ideally in balance, so that all entities support and enhance one another. Major reviews and reports devoted to implementation should occur yearly, and quarterly meetings devoted to examine the goals and objectives, and monitor action plans, are recommended to be held. Planning Although the College is experiencing some significant space issues, it is important that the College not react in a hasty fashion to solve problems for the short-term future. Too often, this can paint an organization into a corner that will be felt for decades and decades. It must be stressed that the College look at all issues in context of the College's Mission and long range institutional plan. CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SJRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 3.22 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE PLANNING ISSUES & ANALYSES IIiIII Campus Technologies Issues 1. Adequate size and location of wiring closets in all campus build- ings. Need for standards. 2. Lack of standards for cable distribution above ceilings and risers between floors. 3. What should classroom standards for technology include? (hard wired, wireless, overhead projection, media console, instructor podium, etc.) 4. Need for additional space for increasing staff, support operations and personnel mergers between departments. (Lower Level Riley remodeling of existing Women's Locker Rooms will alleviate cur- rent needs, but not future I growth needs.) 5. Need quiet space for technology personnel to upgrade technology slcills. (:t--3 stations?) 6. Increased demand for computer labs (coordinate demand with indi- vidual departments) 7. As computers become more applied in educational delivery, demand for "Technology Zone" (faculty technology assistance) increases. 8. Need a technology training room for faculty / staff. 9. Storage space is short in many areas, especially with new PC rota- tion program. 10. Telecomm, Help Desk Campus Technologies are adequately housed, now and after Lower Level Riley remodeling. 11. Students are coming to campus with more technology skills and needs every year, n. Major growth will be in alternative education areas. 13. What will impact of proposed graduate programs be? (similar to Capella University model?) 14. Separate organizations and effort are required due to separate portal, internet intranet and Radio internet entities. 15. IS will still need space after Riley remodeling. Also, IS needs space for quiet technology team space for computer-based training, tech- nology piloting and testing, certification work. 16. IT does not see a need for additional space due to consolidation strategy for servers, data storage and networking. The strategy will allow scalability to permit growth in support and number of people being served. Code Issues Northwestern College has done an excellent job of maintaining its facil- ities. At the same time, there are numerous code deficiencies. Of par- ticular note is that are existing corridors that should have the code required I-hour fire protection. Common air return in corridors (doors, air transfer, HV AC balance) is an especially acute problem. = CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 3.23 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE PLANNING ISSUES & ANALYSES ~, ,... -", _~J {}?-_~_ .~ " t',<', ....... I / '>....., ~" I /~~J. ,'~.'. ,". ~-, ,." .,.:. '\. -'- j/' '"" K,\.., '\> '. ll, ;{:;fJ.~<'" \ ".. .-'?f:~7~V{..':' '::.(':' \..'. - -,,- --:.:..;~<'; ::\)Y .4~\r~:' :'i~_~Ti ;-f: ~~ ' ' L ", t L'5~~" '':_-~''':-'~'',''' ....+t.~ . ,y~.:: "", <"'2'.."",,_.< .::'l<,< .:' !! J~ 0' I ~ '<..<,.~ '\ ') i;:.'~~~./ \.! 1 '-. I ._--.~ "-. ~ ./ .J, ~. I j 1.' r:~-- ' ......,<'.:'::::..,.... <./;;f!>'..'-'>~t/' i _ l \, -'~,\\J/' _ : , .,?\, I '\ 11. ~;..- I l' : ~~. ".,} \"rJ, .'> i I I J t . ,-! 1 ,; l-+:~~~7' I i.J I '. i l I,i .>>"/ .:: 6.,;:-,.,'."... ,i,1 ~ {$I ~:; )' - I ~ J >"'\ "l' 1~'", r' : I // t"<~:=~.,::~ \ \:~""'" : ,. I f ..-' I' , -' , '.' I .0". '; , , ' '\ <. -.' :~....t,,1' {,~~"'-'\,.d> "I", \~" .~~ '. ( \~... '_.""~ -'.l~r !:'~;:';,.- ;'---' ,.,~,;. jH;I- <II 'f'or :...i : J L: I ';j~:.i 0-; ~. \-,~ ". IF ,c.n : J- ; j" {"> ..' / ,: ".j '. ".. , ~;q .-;.-:;;.-.:.~.../ : ., t... -, ,... - , q . '\';'c :V.,, it ~"--_..~----~-----""-------~~~------~-~, _~~~~ O"L~-~~>"~ .~~-i";"~--" ," ~}.~:-~.=-~=t.;-;::= ~~, !J~L.~e Jahllma Main Campus Site Constraints Hj .CJ C=---".t~~::,... CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SlRNY ARCHITECTS .. Sile Conslraints P1.AJI K,!'f' -=<~ ZOOhg &!:b~k DNP'~'&t~" EiI.lJoS;I'I'1l!ft l_mt1TLnne~ Sum-, Pand " - -':'~: ~ PAGE 3.24 Concepl As a result of discussions and input during the Issues Identification Pro- cess, a preliminary con- cept was synthesized by Planners. The concept was reviewed and dis- cussed with Master Plan- ning Committee members on various occassions. The concept plan was endorsed by the Commit- tee and was the basis for further planning develop- ment. PLANNING ISSUES & ANALYSES IIIiII Preliminary Concepl Synlhesis \.s (N~ ) " .?- q~/i<'l""",,4 - "'1-wc rF 1-1"",~ (_ J;;~~_?,'.' .';1,~....,<,,; Ubi3 [A~ N~ ~tlW 'l-Ptr -'J..<lSC' r;;w, 000 (I:) - "r;;tIf 0"'''' G.<;I>li':!l ~ Ket;' "-"";O"O~f,\ o h0P""' sWx.J") NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PAGE 3.25 PARTNERS & 5!RNY ARCHITECTS COLLEGE GOALS -,.'" ... MISSION, OI3JECTI\r);S,ACCREDITAJlO.N& A.rinL\TIONS , , , NO-RTHWESTERN COLLEGE" tAM"rus MASTER .f~:LAN PARTN.ERS & - SIRN'Y ARC~Il.ECTS 'SEC-TroN ..IV .. COLLEGE MISSION, OBJECTIVES & AFFILIATIONS Ell MISSION, OBJECTIVES, ACCREDITATION & AFFFILlATIONS Mission Northwestern College exists to provide Christ-centered higher educa- tion equipping believers to grow intellectually and spiritually, to serve effectively in their professions, and to give God-honoring leadership in the home, church, community, and world. Objectives Northwestern upholds its heritage of biblical distinctives through the vital integration of human knowledge and Divine revelation. The goal of the College is to help develop the whole person, characterized by personal development, spiritual maturity, ethical conviction, intellec- tual curiosity, cultural sensitivity, professional achievement, and faith- ful service to society and the world Spiritual and Elhical Objectives Northwestern provides a relevant alternative to secular education with- out Christian values. Northwestern is a community in which all learn- ing is framed within the Christian worldview found in the Bible. Northwestern promotes a growing love, knowledge, and worship of God seeking to instruct students in those truths Jesus commanded all to observe. Under God's grace and the moral teachings of His word, stu- dents are encouraged to live with humility, honesty, joy; integrity, self- control, and service. Students are encouraged to discern God's truth about the moral issues of our day and realize their fullest potential as Christian witnesses. Northwestern seeks to prepare students to relate their faith to all areas of life, including their academic and professional activities; to think critically from a Christian viewpoint; and to evaluate based upon the Scriptures all human theories and discoveries. Academic Objeclives Northwestern is a Christian Liberal Arts College of the Bible, Arts and Sciences, and Professional Education. Northwestern is committed to the integration of faith, learning, and living as it seeks to' develop the whole person - the complete Christian. Biblical Studies: Northwestern puts Christ and His Word at the center of all activities. The Scriptures are the integrating core for all programs. The biblical studies component is designed to provide a foundation for life and leads students to develop a Christian worldview. Students in traditional academic programs generally register for four credits per NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 4.1 COLLEGE MISSION, OBJECTIVES & AFFILIATIONS IIlII semester in biblical studies. Students emolled in a 4-year degree pro- gram earn a minimum of 30 credits (the equivalent of a second major). Nontraditional, degree-completion students also take a proportionate number of classes in biblical studies. General Education: The general education curriculum at Northwestern College is designed to enhance students' understanding of God and His creation. To this end the curriculum encourages students to be grounded in all aspects of life based on the Scriptures within a variety of disciplines. General education exposes students to knowledge of Western, and non-Western culture, literature, the fine arts, knowledge of fundamental scientific and mathematical principles, and the knowl- edge of human growth and development within a social context. The teaching of general education is designed to develop the student's abil- ity to think critically, to reason analytically, to solve problems, and to communicate effectively in speaIdng and writing, It supports the gen- eral goal of the College to prepare students intellectually, emotionally, physically, spiritually, and socially for life in the church and society, and to be of service to God and others. Majors and Professional Preparation: Northwestern is dedicated to assist- ing students in their development of marketable skills in selected areas, particularly in businesses or professions equally useful in either sacred or secular enterprises. Northwestern uses the term "vocation" in its literal meaning (i.e., God's calling), believing that it is the Christian's responsibility to serve God's purpose in every aspect of life. Campus Life Objectives Northwestern seeks to provide a God-honoring environment that includes wholesome living, aesthetic enjoyment, relationship building, social and cultural opportunity, and athletic and recreational activity. Accredilations +Affiliation Northwestern College is... accredited by the Commission on Institutions of Higher Education of the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools. ... incorporated under the laws of the state of Minnesota as a College of the Bible, Arts and Sciences, and Professional Education. ... is registered with the Minnesota Higher Education Services Office (MHESO). NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 4.2 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE COLLEGE MISSION, OBJECTIVES & AFFILIATIONS .. ... approved by the Minnesota Board of Teaching to offer program lead- ing to teacher licensure. ... approved for the training of students under government educational programs for veterans and war orphans, including Public Law 634 (War Orphans Educational Assistance Act) and Public Law 89-358 (Veterans Readjustment Benefits Act). ... an accredited institutional member of the National Association of Schools of Music. ... a member of the Council for Christian Colleges & Universities. ... a member of the Council of Independent Colleges. ... a member of the National Association of Christian College Admis- sions Personnel and endorses the NACCAP principles of good prac- tice. ... a charter member of the Evangelical Council for Financial Account- ability. ..' an Associated School of Jerusalem University College (formerly the Institute of Holy Land Studies). ... a member of the Evangelical Training Association. ... a charter member of the Association of Christian Schools Interna- tionaL 00 CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 4.3 RECOMMENDATIONS .. GENERAL ":. POLICY IMAGE F A;CILIriES PPERATIONS, . MISCELLANEOUS IMPLEMENTATION .-~ N9RTH-W:ESl'ERN C.Ol.LEGE CAMPUS MASTER 'PLAN' . PARTNERS".f,<- SI-RN"Y ARCHI;TECTS" ~ECTlON -v' RecommendaUons are based on assumplion Ihat Got/ege wit/ increase 10 2,400 average HE NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE RECOMMENDATIONS .. GENERAL 1 Test every decision against the college's Mission and strategic plan, no matter if the issue seems insignificant or not. Does it support the Mission? 2 Formally adopt the Campus Master Plan as part of the Col- lege's Long Range Strategic Plan. 3 Gently guide and nurture the culture change within the institution that will occur by increasing emollment from 1600 to 2400 FIE. The change will occur more smoothly and quickly if students staff, faculty, adminis- tration and trustees are all supported in this significant commitment. An open and positive mind set is the foundation for success. "There is no more delicate matter to take in hand, nor more dangerous to conduct, nor more doubtful of success, than to step up as a leader in the introduction of change. For he who Innovates will have for his enemies al/ those who are well off under the existing order of things, and only lukewarm support in those who might be better off under the new." - Machiavelli Institutional Development Plan Facilities Plan 4 College will need to somewhat increase the density of its land use on campus. At the same time, extreme care needs to be taken to maintain the pastoral character of the campus. 5 Implementing the Campus Master Plan will require working with city entities to determine acceptable levels of development. zoning restrictions, utility planning, neighborhood meetings, etc. On a specific level, the College needs should work with the City(s) to consider the appropriate method of zoning control (designated institutional zoning district, POO, etc.) To help advance this effort, the College needs to maximize positive pub- licity regarding its efforts in the community. (buckthorn eradi- cation, student programs assisting local communities, faculty involvement in community, musical productions, etc.) 6 All estimated costs in the Campus Master Plan are in November 2003 dollars. To account for inflation between November 2003 and when a project actually begins construction, all costs should be escalated to the projected mid-point of construction for each respective project. CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 5.1 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE RECOMMENDATIONS .. 7 Regularly and continually, as opportunities afford, make the case to all community constituencies the reasons why continued, managed growth is essential. I.e., philosophically "we should not limit God's sovereignty for NWC's mission"; and fiscally, "NWC needs the additional revenue in order to accomplish its strategic goals." POLICY 8 To maintain long term integrity of the campus, permanent stand, ing committees should be established for the following purposes: a Space Evaluation Committee: monitor and assess cam- pus-wide space needs, and respond to departmental space requests. b Historical Preservation Committee: ensure aesthetic preserva- tion of campus architecture and artifacts, while at the same time, balancing the true costs with preservation. c Committees shall consist of a broad constituency to assure that the overall interests of the college are assured. 9 While the Master Plan provides a large scale, long-term frame- work, additional detailed studies need to be performed to fully implement the plan, Sub-studies include: a Preliminary storm water engineering study (will involve Rice Creek Watershed) b Preliminary utilities engineering study (capacities, locations, etc.) c Soil borings to determine soil types and capacity d Detailed campus Master Landscape Plan (develop working relationship with a landscape architect) e Engineering report to consider the impact of decentralization versus a central physical plant. f Detailed planning studies (with appropriate consultants and affected staff) to ~i and build 'specialized' spaces 1 0 ~ t:~~:~ PI ,Campus andards should be estab- lished for the following items: a Wayfinding system (site and building internal) b Landscape materials (paving, plant materials, lighting, etc.) (per Landscape Architect) c Furnishings (especially generic classrooms and computer labs where student capacity can be greatly affected by type and sizes of chairs and tables) CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 5.2 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE RECOMMENDATIONS .. d Building finishes (c1eanability, consistency, durability, aesthet- ics, expression of college image, etc.) e Communication systems (data, telecomm, TV, radio, CCTV, etc.) infrastructure standards (wiring closets, cable trays, wiring, podimns, control panels, AV equipment, etc.) Also, large capacity conduit (inter-duct) should be considered between buildings. f Adequate square footage and equipment be allocated for cus' todial and maintenance functions. g Generic classrooms and "Technology" classrooms (finishes, furnishings, lighting, controls, instructor podiums, electronic equipment, etc.) h Space use (square footage per station in classrooms, labs and offices) All remodeling, additions and additions shall consider USGBC (United States Green Building Council) and LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) provisions for design and construction methods, Each individual project shall be reviewed from a cost/benefit analysis perspective, This approach also will serve as support for the college's edu- cational programs, as well as instilling an attitude for respon- sible resource use in its students, staff and faculty. All remodeling and additions shall meet or exceed standards required by: Minnesota State Building Code, DNR, OSHA, ASHRAE, AHERA, and the American with Disabilities Act. 11 Develop a set of 'Design Guidelines in which new buildings, additions and remodelings will use a consistent palette of materi- als, colors and forms (internal as well as external). Building height and massing should also be a major consideration in the design vocabulary and campus fabric. Keep in mind that the college's image is a powerful marketing tool. Materials used can affect many aspects: maintenance costs, initial cost versus "life cycle" cost, consistency with architecture on campus, safety, etc, 12 Consider developing a system of "allocating costs" (heating, cooling, electrical, telecomm, maintenance, repairs, equipment, etc.) for space use in respective departments and user groups that will reflect true departmental facility operational costs. (Keep in mind that the cost structure needs to be balanced against the college's mission, culture and "whole" student.) 13 Building Space Utilization: To help mitigate the shortage of classroom and lab space, cen- tralized space management. (academics, performances, athletics, support functions, etc) will help maximize existing space. CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 5.3 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE RECOMMENDATIONS .. Depending on funding models, teaching methods and faculty efficiency, enroll the optimum number of students in a class. Such efforts will require a genuine commitment on the part of faculty and administration. For this to happen the College should consider the following steps: a Review and assess space utilization in the format of the National Center for Education Statistics manual, Postsecond- ary Education Facilities Inventory & Classification Manual (FlCM). This allows accurate comparisons with other institu- tions. b Adopt policies for and designate shared facilities for general use (like classrooms), rather than allow departmental" owner- ship" of such rooms, c Schedule spaces up to their full potential for each week. Scheduling of all spaces should be done by a designated col- lege administrator with the input of faculty. Consideration of "generic student station", or double-use of student stations in some labs may be appropriate. Measure such scheduling in weekly use hours (WRH) and monitor achievement of sched- uling each school year, d Consider alternatives to the standard MWF I TTh class sched- uling sequence. 14 Policy for Providing Building Space: It is recommended that the College establish an on-going formal process to deal with future space needs and space requests. In an atmosphere of tight financial resources it is prudent to insure that careful evaluation of space needs precedes planuing for expansion. Once program needs are established, the method of providing space to accommodate program needs is recom- mended to be followed in the priority order listed below: a achieve highest utilization of existing space, b renovate and reallocate existing spacers) c expand existing building by new construction 15 The College has a significant need for small, informal student study spaces. The need for such spaces will only increase as the number of students increases. It is recommended that spaces be provided for students to study and to expand the opportunities for social contacts with others, Depending on the specific need and requirements, the study areas could be separate rooms, or could be integrated with the corridor system. Develop a policy for inclusion of study lounge spaces in all new and remodeled spaces (academic and housing). New buildings would dedicate 2-5% of the assignable square footage (ASF) for CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS &< SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE s.~ NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE RECOMMENDATIONS .. study space.. As part of the policy, the study space should not be cut from a project to alleviate budget issues. (proportional reduction) 16 The college should develop a policy for "land bankIDg" property and acquiring/ renting facilities (interim use as 'stop gap' or long term). The college needs to proactively monitor and pursue desirable and potentially available property and facilities. As property or facilities become available, the college should be pre- pared to acquire desirable land and facilities in accordance with an established priority and availability of financial resources, including the use of strategic partnerships and alliances. 17 Strongly support Alternative Education, as this is a potential area of significant growth and income. 18 Periodic Review and Monitoring Implementation of Campus Master Plan: Successful operation of an organization is always based on plan- ning. Planning can be effective only if it is implemented. Imple- mentation requires an organized effort, which sets the action steps required to put the plan's recommendations into practice... into motion. It also reviews the Master Plan in context and moni- tors the achievements and accomplishments of the goals identi- fied during the planning process.. Among the effective working tools of plan implementation are: a. Setting up specific dates to meet and review b.. Designating accountable supervisors c. Reporting progress on the progress of implementation d. These supervisors (leading officers of the institution), should develop detailed plans and strategies to achieve each goal / objective and each recommendation.. e. Major reviews and reports devoted to implementation should occur yearly. Quarterly meetings are recommended to exam- ine the goals and objectives, and monitor action plans. f. Information packets on the plan upgrades should be distrib- uted to inform the NWC 'community', IMAGE 19 Develop a Campus Entrance Plan as part of the new develop- ment, and enhance the feeling of arrival for the visitor, through both exterior and interior treatment of spaces. Such Entrance CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 5.5 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE RECOMMENDATIONS .. Plan should consider pedestrian entrance areas as well as service and vehicular arrival areas 20 Develop a Site Improvement and Landscaping Plan for the entire campus in coordination with the development recommendations of the Campus Master Plan. Special attention should be given to such areas as: pedestrian walkways entry areas interior courts parking areas lake orientation student safety 21 The college should make definitive efforts to maintain consistency in building mate- rials (brick and stone) and their use. The Historical Preservation Committee should be used to ensure historical and aesthetic preservation of campus architecture, as the buildings are an expression of who Northwestern College is. It should be remem- bered that the College's image (physical and psychological) is a powerful marketing tool. (Refer to 'Design Guidelines') 22 Until a new student/ community center can be built, develop Nazareth Hall's east entry so that it gives prospective students a feeling of welcome and importance. 23 As part of educating the whole student, maximize display of stu- dent work throughout campus at appropriate locations. Display- ing artwork on campus in a serious and professional manner will reflect the College's investment in its current students, and also serve as a marketing function with prospective students. 24 Establish forum for informal, low key solo and ensemble "con- certs" (with no electronic needs) at various locations on campus. 25 Look at ways to capitalize on the campus island and chapel. Appropriate uses could be a nature resource and a spiritual retreat. Other uses could be a student-gathering place and a tool to increase funding from outside sources such as weddings and baptisms. An amphitheater could be developed for plays and concerts to be viewed from the shore or on boats off shore. With the quality of the college's music program, these concerts would be a good public gesture and reinforce the college's standing as a good neighbor. CAMl'US MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 5.6 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE RECOMMENDATIONS .. FACILITIES 26 Maintain an 'Institutional' level of quality for building materials.. (cavity wall construction, window construction meeting air infil- tration standards, built-up roof standards, exterior ductwork insulation, indoor air quality, etc.) Refer to 'Design Guidelines'.. 27 Monitor and continue to refine implementation process for the College's 10 year Deferred Maintenance Plan.. This includes building code and ADA issues. 28 Code Compliance: Upgrade code deficiencies as part of the Col- lege's 10 year Deferred Maintenance Plan. Particularly egregious are existing corridors that should have the code required I-hour fire protection.. Common air return in corridors (doors, air trans- fer, HVAC balance) is an especially acute 'Life Safety' problem.. 29 To maximize capital campaign fund "donor dollars" (i.e., naming opportunities), group as many Capital Improvement Plan tasks with proposed new buildings. (Note that NWC Facili- ties Modernization is 3670 of the required Capital Improvement Plan.) 30 Safety/Health/Statutory is about 1070 of the Capital Improve- ment Plan, and even small renovations will require meeting statutory requirements which have associated costs (ex. asbestos abatement, sprinkIer systems, rated corridors, air exchanges, etc.).. 31 Make every effort to stay in line with phasing for the Capital Improvement Plan priorities and schedule, Deference onlyexac- erbates the problems by making existing problems worse and results in higher costs. 32 Incorporate vertical and horizontal wiring paths (wiring closets, chases, cable trays, etc.) in all remodelings, additions and new buildings. Also, large capacity conduit (inter-duct) should be considered between buildings. 33 Maximize flexibility of lecture spaces and meeting rooms through the use of high quality; movable acoustic walls with appropriate STC (sound transmission coefficient) ratings. 34 Flexibility of Spaces: When constructing new building spaces, they should be flexible in serving the educational endeavor to the maximum extent. CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 5.7 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE RECOMMENDATIONS .. Flexibility allows for dealing with unforeseen program develop- ments at a reduced cost and has the potential of facilitating scheduling. Owing to flexibility, spaces can also serve other groups, and therefore, increase the efficient use of facilities. Moreover, the techniques of presenting course material in class have been changing. Innovations, whose aims are ranging from the more thorough conveyance of material to the saving of teach- ing staff hours, are almost constantly being introduced. Ignoring these changes would contradict the very essence of good college building, Le., to facilitate the teaching functions. Here, flexibility intends to mean expandability of spaces and convertibility of spaces. TIlls flexibility may manifest itself in a grid-like (modular) arrangement of structure, mechanical, electri- cal and signal supply lines, so that each module may serve func, tions at a certain, predictable level. These services can be tapped by the educational program at a functional and convenient spot. They could be present, hidden in the floor, or in the ceiling space, etc.. If it were too expensive to build them, the main supply lines may provide a stub, or be only "roughed in" to be used later.. Other practical manifesta- tions of flexibility are: constructing larger, sub-dividable spaces, or generic science labs to serve several subjects. 35 Develop a campus "Central Store" (likely location is in new Studentf Community Center Building) which allows bulk pur- chasing that is cost effective, and maintains better inventory and control. Provide 'legitimate' loading dock for semi loading and step van loading.. 36 As a short term solution to space needs, consider" decking" Riley Hall Gym with a second level, and relocating appropriate campus functions for greater effectiveness in serving the student population. 37 As part of educating the whole student, consider incorporating a Ufitness roornu in new campus housing. 38 The need to use a space or building for a time as short term storage or staging area for a larger project must be understood by the NWC community. A building my not be used at first for its intended or advertised use. (The proposed Community Life Building and Alternative Education Program would be exam- ples..) 39 Relocation of above ground and below grade services should be assessed for cost and planned for relocation to minimize ease- ments and maintenance cost. CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS &; SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 5.8 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE RECOMMENDATIONS .. 40 Information on all proposed facility proposals shall be distrib- uted to the NWC 'community' for review and input. OPERATIONS, ETC. 41 As part of recruiting students, applying for grant requests and soliciting funds for its capital campaign, the college should con- tinue to capitalize on the uniqueness of its strengths.. (music ministries, ancient literature, campus setting and architecture, _..) 42 In order to "bridge the facilities gap" between 1600 FTE and 2400 FTE, the admissions process must be monitored closely and managed in parallel with future building construction. 43 Investigate and acquire software that allows campus wide scheduling and facility utilization to become more centralized, integrating academic and event scheduling. (academics, extra- curricular, performances, visitors, weddings, special events, etc.) 44 To maximize efficient use of space, departmental "ownership" of classrooms and general labs should not be permitted. 45 To alleviate immediate space needs, incorporate one or two addi- tional hours per day to the schedule. Review issue of "protected" hours. 46 To provide more flexibility of operations and minimize the need for new space, large group functions can be broken down into smaller groups. (Chapel, dining, concerts, etc.) Culture of the College needs to be included in the discussions of making these changes. 47 As part of on-going space management, continue to monitor square footage use and compare against norms. (Space use man- agement would be improved when the College implements a "cost allocation" system to encourage departmental efficiencies, as well as accountability.) 48 Consider designating parking zones that reflect frequency of use and need. Control parking with the use of vehicle stickers. 49 Purchase Sutton Field for use as overflow practice field. (Note that officials of Presbyterian Homes potentially have plans to build on the Sutton Field area in 7 years.) 50 Expand student broadcasting and television to closed-circuit campus programming_ CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 5.9 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE RECOMMENDATIONS .. 51 Provide a mid-size auditorium/ theatre in the music wing addi- tion seating 500:t persons. This would be a more efficient loca- tion for 'black box' theatre, chapel" overflow", smaller concerts, chapel alternatives, theatre productions, conferences, etc. than using Maranatha auditorium (1500) or Nazareth Chapel (300). This space could also be considered for rental use to produce outside income. 52 Research ways to reduce overhead costs by reduction of waste, more efficient use of present resources, student involvement in the preservation of physical assets, and energy conservation mea- sures (heat recovery, ground source heating and cooling, occu- pancy sensors for lighting, etc.). All remodeling, additions and additions shall consider USGBC (United States Green Building Council) and LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) provisions for design and construction methods. Each individual project shall be reviewed from a cost/benefit analysis perspective. MISCELLANEOUS 53 In the College's 10 year Deferred Maintenance Plan, NWC was compared to about 18 other schools. As an aid to continual improvement by NWC, it would be beneficial to evaluate NWC's strengths and weaknesses in comparison with the other schools referenced. 54 Research and assess availability of grants, and discuss potential approaches with assets and sister colleges. 55 Do a performance analysis in each of the college's departments and streamline service. 56 Evaluate all services that the College produces and purchases, compare them against the industry norms and standards (cost, quality, life expectancy, etc), and make adjustments to improve the College's position. IMPLEMENTATION 57 As the College seriously develops its plans for expanding to 2400 traditional student FTE, the time frame must be developed in concert with, and in parallel with, the Capital Campaign for new space. CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 5.10 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE RECOMMENDATIONS .. 58 Prepare formal marketing materials for Capital Campaign (plan- ning drawings, preliminary building design, renderings, etc.) efforts. Planning Consultant should work with College's market- ing department in preparation of such materials. 59 When budgeting for construction projects, typical" soft costs" range from 25-30% of total Project Cost. (Construction Cost 75% + Soft Costs 25% = Project Cost 100%) Also, added maintenance costs and faculty / staff costs for the new facilities need to be accounted for during planning stages. In addition, inflation costs need to be projected (and included in project budget) for year that project is built. 60 Develop a high level financial model covering the next fifteen year period that reflects: a) the building and operational costs for the new facilities specified in the Campus Master Plan, b) the additional student tuition and fee revenue associated with the projected student FTE growth, and c) the additional faculty; staff, and operating costs attendant with this growth. = CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 5.11 I~ r r-'- ,~ -' , , , 'J '.... '-' '-- '--_J u ~_. u '- '-- NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE ,-J '--- IMPLEMENTATION .. IMPLEMENTATION DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK' PHASING COST PROJECTIONS COSTS CAMPUS MASTER PL"AN PARTNERS & SlRNY ARCHITECTS S'J;:CTJON Vl NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE IMPLEMENTATION .. IMPLEMENTATION The Potential Built Form The Campus Plan shows the potential built form of the campus as major goals are accomplished. The Plan combines land use, circulation and physical form aspects of campus development. The Plan is influenced by the Mission, current campus operation, governance! management and by implementation of the recommen- dations described earlier in the Plan. Development Framework The 'Development Framework' sets general direction and permits mid-course adjustments as conditions change. It was developed through a participatory planning process representing all interests on campus. Through a series of extensive interviews and meetings, unanimous consensus was developed by the Campus Master Plan- ning Committee. Refer to the 'Campus Master Plan Scope' drawing on the following page. Timeframe The planning process generally looked at campus development over 3 basic time periods: 5-10 years 10-25 years 25-75 years (long term) Cost Projections A cost projection was prepared for use in planning a Capital Cam- paign. This cost projection looks at the next 20-30 years for comple- tion of elements illustrated on the following Campus Master Plan Scope drawing. CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS FACE 6.1 Note: A larger 11 x 17 version of this plan is inserted atthe end of the Master Plan. NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE IMPLEMENTATION .. PROPOSED ArtBuilding& Sculptlm'" Ti"lTa...... Remod..J Powe.-hou"," Dwnoli~h Shed 0; H,600SF M115ic Addition (Art) 1q.IIDGSF 13 Li."\'".ls P~l" Ul12'>"Slilll... 1bintenaDu>lL Community Life. u-nf(>T ~<:--;l Ce-nenlPurpose1 C' G,,"SfOOffi5 sqcroSF J 31........ls lihnryAddition 14cnJGSF/3Lew-]s _d=k<;"""..1} Sje""t 4~OOJCSff3L""yeh; Poukin~2Lewls l[DlVad~+I5buduH.'<IIC'Vdl 49O"Stalls New DonnitOJY 5'$O'-Beds/3LI.'YI.']s New Fil'ldho1l."C" 160' ~300' 4C<1lImflndnnrtrark In;:kl''' Roo""l Ofiil;'-e<; : C=~.o,' I Athlliic Fields Reconfigured Vi!;iIoT f Alumni wlOO'r SF lbd DlmloJi5h &51g Dorm (73) Fulun> Buildin~1 Addition 'to KTI5 All hi, Admin, OffiO'S, CIa,;tW\JJT15. Pede51riilflBridge New Donniloq; ~~~~i3tl:~~s LL Paclcing ......--.........."., / q " / ..........._~~~- Development Framework EXISTING /"i..." " ( ( '--~ \.) \. , ----...~---- ~- ----- {Eiland Chapel and Natuw Resol/K'" "'. /........... -'.., /.:. -I '\. ,2~~~~') \ \ -0 (I:"',., X :c::...A I &!!::::f;::,:~', - /~~:__;_\..,_,=f< /}.:~ BomlSWo R....oun:..ComtW" ~,:..~.~,' ,.'.~2:.Y;)...'.;, <:~ I --);t~)) I / \\\;,'~ \," ".-,;/ -I / \ \:::>-;: >;:/ .. . '\.-? .;:/:~"?t. -f ilJ/ J--'~~_~ Exi!,.'tinI!:TennisCOI.Irls .~~~. ~:~, ~'<'!t' 'V-<:':-.)\ --.1 , --- ~": 11 ,; I; ;. ~~:?-.-. .Jllf' !'- - -f~~./':," Mi>11~hn5cr1M~~S~~: ---=-'C~~~~~~: --i~:'i ,<_\ 4""" SF ~ ,Ig2aLZJ"" '-fr:;-" .-Llrbk~ji//; [!A;r;j.o~r::r. ..J ~~~~~~ijH-t4~ stB"" 0"> --0:~V/:i i!1 { ,'!('n <'-.:;C" '.'" Yj~' ( f~~" '~i) if.! :('{f=;-j Donnito1Y ~. '. 11.'. /. "..1 '~~'-" ......-~lJ" J ~ /J r :." I' ,,,,.....,...::.,,... ID '.. _.; /If'" 1':11 !: 86B005 ')~~/5 "ii{~ r ,:{(~: /I~ IJ L~-~" NiU<lrelhH"JJ 12qi50GSF Tntinn Fin.. Arl5 CEnt"r 63,115GSF 2&8.'13 GSF ___}Me'j'Hal! 49,69:5GSF Deck~'madd n.900ASF - MOj'e1" DOmUKll}' 88 Beds Erid.,;:en Gmtw 35.~g: Knut!OlJnfHartill 6.'IOBed!> South Tt>I'ra,;:". Dorm 73 Beds L SFtbcl Donnitol)' 290&!:.n"HinS ; Campus Master Plan Scope EB I: CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SlRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 6.2 " i'5 ~~ U~ ~ 55~ ::l a-.E: -" cJl5 Q ~ ~ ,,- co u~ , ~~ ~ g.:E Unifs ~ ~ UQ if U~ added 00 1 I 11,900 2 I 330 3a D 125 3b D 12,000 3c D 4a D 4b 4c 4d 5a I 5b D 5c D 6a 6b D 60,375 7 D 60,375 8 9a 9b D 10 D 11,600t 12a I 12,000 12b 225 13 15,700 14 15a 15b 48,000 16 tbd Undetermined D NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE IMPLEMENTATION .. Phasing The table below outlines a potential phasing sequence. Obviously, the Development Framework allows flexibility in development, so as facilities are built, adjustments must be made to inter-dependent sequences. As well, phasing scenarios may be adjusted due to chang- ing priorities, funding availability, etc. The column titled 'Occupancy Sequence" lists whether various phases are occupant! operationally dependent or not. I.e., each phase must consider whether existing operations will be impacted during and after construction. Spacers) Comments Riley Hall Gym Decking/remodeling Poential purchase 330 beds Maranatha Ramp New LL Maint Faciliites Reconfigure l'N'I Storm Pond Realign road behind Riley Hall Reconfigure Nazareth south and east parking Build Student Life Building Add Storm Pond Construct 'Mall' Music Addition Remodel exstg main level music area(east) Phase 1 parking (exstg tennis) Remodel Phase 1 Nazareth Remodel Phase 2 Nazareth Poential purchase 330 beds Athletic associated fields Fie!dhouse and Powerhouse Remode! Library Addition Phase 2 Parking (exstg tennis) Remodel South Terrace into Offices New Dormitory Apt 2940 Snelling Infill Re'align road for new academic bldg Science / General Academic Bldg Build Visitor's / A!umni Center Sculpture Terrace add 11,900 sl Academic space (not part 01 Capital Campaign) UL lor Maranatha event use includies lood service Art + general classrooms construct ijn two halves assumes one hal! of total = 60,375 (remove kitchen) assumes one hall 01 total = 60,375 (not part 01 Capital Campaign) second hall Alt Ed, admin, etc. tbd per mech/elec study Central vs Decentraolized Physical Plant CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SJRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 6.3 Note: Thesecoslprojecllonsneedtobeupdaledbi- annuallytllrelleclcurrenllrueoosts(inllaUon). IMPLEMENTATION lID Cost Projections Coo" So, TolalProjedCost Buildings BuiWlII~/Ama "" Coot c,," NIW2003Do1/1lls Community Life Center/General Function/Classroom (Phase 1) (phsng 10% prem) 45,000 GSF 6.750.000 1,687,500 8,437,500 Community Life Center/General Functions/Classrooms {Phase 2) 35.000 GSF 5,250.000 1,312,500 6,562.500 Music Addilion 20,000 GSF 3.200.000 000.000 4,000.000 Existing Music area(east} remodeling (Art and?) 6,000 GSF 360,000 90,000 450.000 General AcademicJScience Building (hair sciern::e, half academic) 48.000 GSF 8,400.000 2,100.000 10.500.000 Greenhouse {integral 10 bldg} 500 GSF 125,000 31.250 156.250 Nazareth Remodel Phase 1 (Phasing adds 30%) 60,000 GSF 5.100,000 1.275,000 6.375.000 Nazareth Remodel Phase 2 (Phasing adds 30%) 60,000 GSF 5.tOO,000 1.275,000 6,375.000 Renovate Powerhouse (academic + aemin) 11.600 GSF(') 1.160.000 290.000 1.450.000 Sculpture / Music Terrace -tbd tbd tbd tbd library Addition 12.000 GSF 1.980,000 495,000 2,475,000 Alumni Center 10.000 GSF (tbd) 1,550,000 387,500 1.937,500 New Classroom/OffICe Building 30.000 GSF 4,200,000 t,050.000 5.250,000 (demolish South Terrace Dorm) Fieldhouse (6 lane track, 4 tennis courts, ._.. ...) 51.200 GSF 6.144,000 1,536.000 7,680,000 Ancillary Space (Offices, lockers, toilets, etc.) 8,000 GSF (tbd) 1,200,000 300,000 1.500,000 Concessionary 750 GSF 13t.250 32,813 164.063 New Dormllory Easl- Phase 1 (adjacent to Knutson) 275 Beds! 8.682,500 2,165,625 10,828.125 New Dormitory East - Phase 2{adjacent to Knutson) 275 Beds:!:: 8.662.500 2,165.625 10,828,125 New Dormitory Api 2940 Snelling Infill 95 Beds! 3.087.500 771.875 3,859,375 Underground parking 35 Stalls! 630.000 157,500 787,500 Potential Purchase of Existing Apt Bldg{s) for Dorms unknown Beds lbd tbd Ibd Renovation Cost for Converting Apts unknown Beds Ibd Ibd tbd Parking Facility East (exstg tennis) (1 level slab-on-grade) 250 Stalls:!: 1,125.000 281.250 1,406,250 1 Structured level 250 Stalls! 3.500.000 875,000 4,375,000 Parking Facility NW (UL for Maranalha event use) 125 Stalls! 2.000,000 500.000 2,500,000 lower level Maintenance Operations (ll) 12,000 GSF (ven~) 1.440,000 360.000 1,800.000 Physical plant functions tbd per Eng Study tbd tbd tbd (central or per bldg?) (omenl central plant includes Maranalha, Nazarelhand Riley) Subtotal Building Costs 79,757,750 19,939,438 99.697,188 5itework Note: Sitework scopeJcosl projections 10 be verified wi conceptual engiMering design Construct 'Mall' Blue Room/President's Reception Courtyard (relocate KTIS satellites) Re-route road behind Riley Hall Re-route road west of New AcadlScjenee Bldg Re-route road al athlelic fields/enlry Community life parking reconfiguration (north) Community Life parking reconfiguration (south) Relocate Athletic Fields FoolballfSoccer (turf) Baseball (turf, dirt sliding pits + mound) Softball (dirt infield, tun outfield) Permanent bleachers, Press box Re-use exstg bleachers for baseball (?) Dug outs, fencing, goal posts, ete Tunnel re-configurationfre-!ocalion Tunnel extensiuon from Riley to New Parking facility Dala line re.location Utility Work (new, re.location, re-sizing) {water, sewer, elec} Add storm water storage pond{s) (Incl piping, etc.) Re-size, re-locate storm storage ponds Implement Master Landscape Plan (ptantmaleriats,surfaces. Vlalks,~ghling,silefurnrshings,signage,etc.) Subtotal Sitework Costs GRANO TOTAL (Site & Buildings) NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE "" 160,000 SF Allowance 14,000 SF Allowance 1,400 LF 400 LF 100 LF 150 Stalls!: (Allowance) 100 Stalls!: {Allowance) All athletic fields Lump Sum Reid lighting 2,000 Allowance per seat 200 Allowance per seat 1 Allowance 1 Allowance 300 llf Allowance 1 Allowance 1 Allowance 1 Allowance 1 Allowance tbd CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS &. SIRNY ARCHITECTS 86,663,250 21,039,6633 Coo. Coot 560.000 84.000 50' Cosls' 140.000 21.000 259.000 74.000 18.500 225,000 150.000 38.850 11,100 2,775 33,750 22.500 1,600.000 240,000 175.000 26,250 800,000 120,000 60.000 9.000 250.000 37.500 450.000 67,500 250.000 37.500 1.000,000 150.000 650.000 97.500 300.000 45.000 tbd tbd 6.905,500 1,100,255 TotaJProjedCost ifl/{ov2003Do11ars 700.000 105.000 297.850 85.100 21.275 258,750 172,500 1.840.000 201.250 920.000 69.000 287,500 517.500 287.500 1,150.000 747,500 345.000 tbd 8,005,725 107,702,913 PAGE 6.~ NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE IMPLEMENTATION 11m Costs It should be noted that costs in this report (and virtually any construc- tion project) are differentiated as Construction Costs, Soft Costs and Project Costs. This is an important distinction when comparing costs, but even more important when budgeting future projects. Construction Cost + Soft Costs = Project Cost Typical Project Cost Breakdown 75% Construction Cost (site and buildings) 25% Non-B1dg Cost (or "soft" cost) 100% Project Cost Typical Ranges of Non-Building Costs 2-4% Utilities (basic, i.e., sources available nearby) 2-4% Landscaping 8-10% Furnishings, Fixtures & Equipment (FF+E) (may ind datal technology I wiring) (ind internal wayfinding signage) 1-2% Miscellaneous (testing, permits, etc.) 7-9% Arch/ engineering fees (add 25% for remodeling projects) 3-20% Contingency (normal range: New = 2-5%, Remodel = 15-25%) Contingency Fund For most projects, 3-5% should be allocated for a Contingency fund at beginning of construction. For remodelings, a minimum of 15% is recommended but can vary considerably dependent on project. Escalation Note: All costs are estimated in November 2003 dollars. For budget- ing future projects, costs should be escalated bi-annually, or as a mini- mum, annually for inflation. For future planned projects, costs should be projected forward to mid-point of actual construction period. Note: The State of Minnesota Department of Administration (Finance Division) is currently using 4.5% annually for inflation. However, it should be noted that inflation is at a historically very low level. CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SlRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 6.5 ," /.., " , ,;- ,. \- ,: :--.' , \,." \.~-' \.../ '\.J ~. '-.' ',--/- \.j. .'-' NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE v APFENDlCES Ell GLOSSARY INSTRUCTIONAL SPACE SUMMARY MEETING MINUTES, CAMPUS STUDIES FAOUTY DATA & RESOURCES CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS &. SIRNY ARCHITECTS APPENIHCES NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE GLOSSARY .. GLOSSARY CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECtS APPENDIX. A' GLOSSARY .. GLOSSARY OF SELECTED TERMS Assignable Square Feet Areas of a building assigned to, or available to, an occupant except (ASF) Custodial Area, Circulation Area, Mechanical Area and Building Struc- tural elements), Normally, all areas supporting instructional efforts, directly or indi- rectly. Building Programming The process, or resulting document, which is a generalized prescription for a proposed facility. Prescriptive elements include: square footage for specific, individual functions I spaces (as opposed to space utilization planning which is an averaged based square footage projection tool); number of stations; number of users; functions to be performed; tech- nical requirements (mechanical, electrical, lighting, etc.); fixed equip- ment; loose equipment; furnishings required; etc. Building Efficiency The Net Assignable Square Feet (NASF or ASF) divided by the Gross Square Feet (GSF). Capital Development A building program outlining the capital construction projects to be initiated, Program their relative priorities, and the projected costs of each project. A statement of the capital resources required to accom- plish an institution's goals and objectives. Oassroom A room used by classes which do not require special-purpose equip- ment for student use. Typically, they are provided with writing sur- faces for lectures. Full Time Equivalent Represents one student carrying what the institution considers to be a full, normal academic credit load. Full Year Equivalent Represents one faculty or staff member working what the institution considers to be a full, calendar year. Generic C1assroom/Lab A classroom or lab whose use is not restricted by departmental or pro- gram control. Typically, lab spaces cannot be considered generic. Gross Square Feel Sum of the floor areas including the outside faces of exterior walls for (GSF) all stories or areas, which have floor surface. Head Count The total number of students, including both part-time and full-time, NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCH:!TECTS APP A.l GLOSSARY .. Room Utilization A numerical value, usualIy set by institutions, which specifies the expected Standard Weekly Room Use (WRU). Laboratory Space A space designed and / or furnished with specialized equipment to serve the needs of a particular area of study for group instruction in regularly scheduled classes. The design and / or equipment in such room normally precludes its use for other areas of study. (See Room Ownership.) Room "Ownership" Any room, particularly classrooms and laboratories, whose use is restricted by departmental or program control. Section One or more students formally organized for instruction in a specific course under the supervision of an instructor. Space Management The allocation of an institution's facilities resources to the various orga- nizational units, usually though application of detailed planning and programming methodologies. Station The total facilities required to accommodate one person. Station Count The number of stations in a room. Station Utilization Rate The average number of hours per week each station is used: (SUR) SUR ~ total weekly student hours total number of stations Weekly Faculty One hour spent by one faculty member in contact with a scheduled Contact Hour instructional section. Weekly Student One hour spent by one student in a scheduled instructional section. Contact Hour (WSCH) Weekly Room Use The number of hours a room is used per week for scheduled course (WRU) activities, SOURCE: H!gher Education Facilities Planning and ManagemenlTechnical Report No. 14. NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SlRNY ARCHITECTS API' A.2 r r-" ,~ ',.J ~, "'--.:' ,..; '-..: '-..j ",. \..--' NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE ,---; ,--,- INSTRUCTIONAL SPACE SUMMARIES .. INSTRUCfIONAL SPACE SUMMARY CAMPUS MASTER .PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS APPENDIX B ~~ m.. "., '" GiI ~ m- ..,~~ .. ~ [}J @] Q" ......l" ~. []]"' v..l!:S -. m [!J o Q l2J 8J rn $;:;gl&~ j~~==~~ gClt o~~ ~H ~i~ ~ Zgiii_1: l3"<'>~ ~li~g~ ~~~~~g b~g~:;;i~ Zc:~ll.::;:Z . g ~ o ..; NNO mmo ~~d ~ ~ ~ ,.: ~ro 0 ~~ 0 ~~ d NN o 0100 o a! ! 1 o a! I 1 o .::> I I I o O! 1 1 o o I I I o 8~ 1 I ~ ~ o 001 ~ N ~~ I I 00 <"IN o C'lNC'-- mm ~:: :;; ~ ..; ....-<'-<'- roro ~~ ~" " o ~ ~ ~ "' '" + ~ g E u 28~~ ~ ~.~ ~ ..!!l!! OUcnCl o o o ~ <=>~ ~:::: NORTHWESTERN COL.LEGE ApPENDIX (l>mr--C':l O::>N-=r...- ~~Nd ...-r--mtt'> MC':lmm co 0) (0....- c:ic6C"'i N~ 01 ! 1 O! O! ! 01 ! I 01 ! 1 01 N N ~ ~ m m &1f?: 1 I ~~~ 00 001 ~o_ MW~ N~O cO"":"": OO! U) <0 <0 1.0 t-"-f1Oc) "",r.o<D....- ~-a5....: " o ~ ~ ~ "' ;, f ~~ ~ m_d::... c~~ .Q~<u t:S:::I..J ~S ~~ ra <I) a <:::L ...I.EuO ~ '" 00......0 O...-...-N C'lNNN <0 0 com.... ...,. r--N '<:TO ...idNO""'; M~N o o ~ .. SPACE CATEGORIES SUMMARY Refer to 2001 Space U6lization Study for detail o N '" N ;J ::t ~ ~ ""'....-NO.... -=r 10 "'" CQ <=> ;:~~q.?;n :5 g :z ~ ~ ~<D<: r--= C'--c() ...-rn"<r r-- CO<.DN <:0 N ' ~ ~ NC'-C'-- M ~, commC'-.e>- ~M~ WN~ ..tNN N ...-co(') co <00...- M r--~.... 1.0 ~ _mm"<to N...-com"" t- <:0 "<t N....- -DNM N~~ E E 00 && "'~ o 0 :go ~ ~ ~a== Ei:~ ~~~88 g~~~5S MMMMM CAMPUS MASTER PLAN o o o o o o ~ ~ o o N ~ ;;:; o o o o ~ u m ~ "' ~ ~ " a; o o ~ o o o ~ N M o o o ~ ~ N o o o ~- N o o ~ m .,. ~ M m N e o => .. " ~ ~ "' o o ~ o ~ M ~ 0\ o o o o ~ o m ..; o N N o !;; ~ N I'l o ~ o .,. N ~ ,; .. ~ o e '" o o o ~ ;; ... :il o M o o N ,.: N ~ ~ M o ~ o it o N m ;J M o ~ M M o of o ~ u m ~ "' " o ~ ~ " "' o o ~ ~ M .,; ~ ~ >ri tri ~ ~ o N ~ ..; M :it N ;! '" N ro m o ..; N M o ..; ~ ~ o .,; M ro ~ ~ '" ~ (l>CO"<f"U) t- (l>O....lO t- oO C"'i ..,..: cD c; M "'-N t- <>>...,.."lO M CON...-N U) "<t" CQ t- 00 U) g..r~~ ~- Nc:>....O M M ~ ~ ~ ~ m ,r) 06' OOONO <=> N ~ ro ~ ~ ~ <=>coC)<=> NN~ .... N coOC>O (:Q _ M ~ t- M ~ ~o~o ~ 0000 <;> co...,..., t- c> .... COo!. ~ C'l1O.....0 ~ (1).... co ao C'lMM en ~N"";- <D ~O~~ ~ ~~~O ~ M ..0 COC>OO lO OCON co ~N~ N M .....<DN...... M R-~~C?; ~ <:0 .,..;-a;; ~ ~;::~~ ~ ...........co<o <0 ,..: ~a) en t-enc>co ...,. en en...... co ao COlO<D<O ao .,; ~~ M ~ N ~ ;; 6-"N~ 'i;~~5 "5.2.c1:; u ." U ::I c38~ci; h~~ ~ N ~ ;:;:;: ~~ o o ~ g ~ 0 a)~ PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS o ~ ~ ti' ;1; ~~ o N ~ ~ M ~ ~ oO~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g~ o o o o :<l ~ e m U S .. ~ '" "- '" '" ~ m ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " :i .g '" '" o o ~ o o ~ ;J ..; ~ M ~ :e M ~ ~ ~ o ~ g ~ :f !;; '" it '" N N ill M M M o ~ o ~ 'Ii o ~ ~ of M ;;:; ~ ;1; ~ ... M l;l ~ .. N M ~ M o ~ ill '" ~ N ~ ~ ~ lJ; '" il ~ -'" o o . ~ :l; " " '!l '" <> Q iil ~ ~ ., ~ APP B.l /.-~ . 1..... ~ NORTHWESTERN CO!--LEGE. ,~ MEETING MINUTES .. MEETlNGMINlfiEs CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS. & SIRNY ARCHITECTS APPENDIX ~ ApPENDIX .. MEETING MINUTES Note: Meeting minutes reflect the two different time periods under which the planning efforts were performed. The initial planning effort was based on 1600 FTE .under an interim president. The second portion of the planning effort was based on 2400 FTE under newly appointed President Dr. Cureton. ~i1F1~~ l~~~~~ 14 June 2001 MEMO TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Mastep Campus Plan Committee Kay Stmyny, Committee Secmtapy June 18, 2001 Minutes fpom June 14, 2001 meeting Present: Dp. Hal Millep, Dp. Bapb Lindman, Dp. GeITY Bouma, ])Po JeITY Beilby, Jane Goedeke, Matt Hill, MaI'k Baden, Phil Lachep, Dp. Doug Huffman, Dp. Tim Tomlinson and Kay StPOyny Monica Gmves, Steve MOITOW and Dale Solbepg Absent: 1. IntPOduction: Hal Millep gave an ovePView of what the committee will need to accomplished in the next couple of months. The committee will be using the infopmation fPOm the space utilization study fPOm PaI'tnem and Sirny and the estimate of space needs fop academic pPOgrams and academic suppoI't sePVices. The committee must ppesent a list of prioritized needs to Joe Smith by August 1, 2001. 2. Reviewed Estimate of Space needs for Academic Programs and Academic SuppoI't Services: BaI'b Lindman reviewed the presuppositions of the study: Enroliment cap of 1600 student FTE: Discussed why 1600 FTE was chosen verse other numbeps. The enrollment number will affect classrooms, office space, etc. Phil reported that in 1996, the city of RoseVille Phase II Plan Unit Development (PUD) appPOval was extended to August 2001. The PUD plan has approved footings for a dorm. Courses taught during 8 period academic week .. The bOaI'd has been debating the 8 a.m. - 3 p.m. school day. The boaI'd wanted the day to run fPOm 8 a.m. - 5 p.m.., but the pPOblem is about 788 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS APP C.t NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE ApPENDIX .. students are registered for something after 3 p.m. Square footage calculations for classrooms are based on 15 square feet per student and the space utilization study uses a different square footage number, but their findings are very close. FT faculty teaches approximately 81% Of courses ' This number impacts facility offices. General Purpose Classroom Space Needs: Northwestern has 27 general purpose classrooms available during the 8 period day. Several classrooms have features that make them less desirable for classrooms. The carousels include 1/5'" of our classroom space and they were not designed to be classroom and N136 used to be a storeroom.. The student center classrooms were not included in this report because they just starting using them last summer. Tbe student center classrooms are included in the space study done by Larry Page. Conclusion: 13, 300 Sq. ft is needed for general purpose classrooms. NWC could get more space by decking Riley or Nazareth infill. General Discussion on FTE: There was discussion about using a different FTE number and how it would affect the College. If we cut back on FTE it would cut costs, but there are other items to consider, Jerry Bouma expressed the need for cubic feet of a room in order to fit bigger instruments into a room. Long-range planning committee - There is no long.range planning committee anymore. The long-range plan was presented to everyone, but the final draft never was approved. The decisions of this committee will have a big impact on the next campaign. 3. Soace Utilization Study bv Partners &: Sirnv - Executive Summarv: Phil gave an overview of the space study done by Larry Page. Larry was charged to tell us where the College is short on space (office, classrooms, etc). The study found that the office size is actually larger than industry standard but we are not going to change them. The study supported the fact that there are not enough facilities to accommodate our needs. Phil recommended utilizing Larry Page to help us finish the report. It was decided that Larry should come to the next meeting. Phil will contact Larry. CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SlRNY ARCHITECTS A PP c.z NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE ApPENDIX .. The food service area has a space shortage. Reco=enda. tions from the study include expanding the dining room area, change dining eating time and chapel time. The bookstore could be bigger. Lounges - Although adequate total square footage of lounge space is provided, it would be desirable to have a higher percentage of total lounge space. The committee discussed what other colleges have as a student center or student union. and thought they should consider this as a possibility, but would llke to hear ideas from Monica Groves. Parking - The committee questioned if there was enough parking on campus for 1600 FTE. Phil reported there are around 1,000 parking spaces and the College purchased a bus for the shuttle service. About 2 years ago, Bethel decided that freshman couldn't have a car on campus unless they worked. Handout: Hal Miller handed out a project for all the committee members to complete by the next meeting on Thursday, June 21 at 9:00 a.m. Please type your report. 21 June 2001 MEMO TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Master Campus Plan Committee Kay Stroyny, Committee Secretary June 21, 2001 Minutes from June 21, 2001 meeting Present: Dr. Hal Miller, Dr. Barb Lindman, Dr. Gerry Bouma, Dr. Jerry Beilby, Jane Goedeke, Matt Hill, Phil Lacher, Dr. Doug Huffman, Dr. Tim Tomlinson, Kay Stroyny, Monica Groves, Dale Solberg and Steve Morrow Mark Baden Larr:y Page from Partners and SiPny Absent: Guest: Hal Miller introduced Larry Page to the committee. Larry made a few co=ents and emphasized the College's:. mission will affect how we want to use our space. The minutes from the June 14, 2001 meeting were approved with a minor change. The minuets indicated R1l6 as a storeroom but it should read N136 as a storeroom. Note: Hal Miller stated it is ok for the committee members to share this information with other people. CAMPUS MASTER PLAN APP C.3 PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS lr;( '\3 rp - fif..- ! \-;00 ApPENDIX .. L Enrollment Expectations Handout: Doug Huffman, Dean of Admissions & Records gave his report and pointed out the following items. Properw - The campus must be prepared for about 1,700 students to average 1,600 FTE for a school year. Mission -The facilities affect how we are going to do our mission and space is needed to make it" happen, but we should not let space completely dictate our mission. Markets - There are 3 areas to consider when marketing the college. Demographics - 58% of NWC's student body come from MN and 30 % from WI, lA, ND, SD, and IL. It is important to note that the "echo boom" (children of the "baby boomers") is to hit its high school graduation peak in Minnesota in 2003 with 63,165 graduates, more than any year since the 1980's. The CCCU discovered that the biggest competitors to Christian institutions for Christian students are public institutions like the U of M because of perceived quality and affordability. Target Audience - The College's pool of potential students for traditional day school is limited. The enrollment surge in 2000.2001 and record retention has put us two years in advance of the projection model to reach the 1,600 FTE goal. Affordability - NWC is already too expensive for the families that send their students here according to the comparison of price to estimated family wealth. Schools like Bethel charge more, but their families can afford it. NWC may need to raise awareness and have a different marketing scheme. Discussion: Barb co=ented that the CCCU 3 top institutions have noted for retention the cost, size and spiritually. The larger the size the higher the retention. Larry Page co=ented that once Northwestern reaches 1600 FTE we might have to be more selective in certain areas (students, majors, ete). 2. General Classroom Needs Handout: Dr. Barb Lindman, Dean of Curriculum and Instruction gave her report and pointed out the following items. Based from the space study from Partners & Sirny and NWC course enrollment data, it is estimated that an additional r. q '5< ~ 6.,~93 square feet of general use classroom space is needed ~ 6. ~frt.- -t '1!J '/wco=odate an FTE of 1600. If the less,than'desirable eLA~'2, ~<>>t\I\. classrooms are not used the total needed is 13,818 square '!:.f4<.<a- . feet. The new media building could have room for classes, but because of the distance of the building more time would be needed to pass to the next class. See tables 1.5 in handout for specific data, NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS &: SIRNY ARCHITECTS APP c.t NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE ApPENDIX .. Discussion: The concern arose that Riley does not have an elevator and some students are not able to get to the second floor. Phil commented that the Riley building was grand.fathered in and if there is any major remodeling done to the building an elevator would have to be installed. The dark' room door in the Art lab will be made handicap accessible to accommodate students needs. 3. Alternative Education handout: Dr. Tim Tomlinson, Dean of Alternative Education gave bis report and pointed out the following items. Tim gave a short overview of the programs: FOCUS - on campus classes in the evenillgs Pathways Project - on and off campus classes in the evenillg Distance Education - off campus classes Personal Enrichment - classes meet at night and weekends on campus Urban Bible Institute - no space needs MacLaurin Institute - on site at the U of M Quito campus - Ecuador Graduate program - tbis is not a reality yet, but would need classrooms and administrative offices There will be a greater need in the next 15 years for office spac8t classroom space and production area. The production area would be use for video conferencing and media projects. Some of the projected space needs could be located off campus, but not all of it. There is also an indirect space need that would put more pressure on other areas on campus such as information tecbnologies, financial aid, business office, admissions and student development. Discussion: Larry bought up a concern for the space need of the graduate program. Tim explained the graduate programs would be similar to Capella University. Classes would be over the internet with residential requirements in the summer time, wbich would need to be worked out with Event Services. 4. Student Develonment Handout: Monica Groves, Dean of Student Development gave her report and pointed out the following items. Using the 1600 FTE number there would be 1708 studente enrolled by fall of 2005. The proposed reSident/commuter student ratio would be 70% on campus housing and 30% commuting. Only 27 % of the commuting studente are provided lockers. CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS API' c.s NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE ApPENDIX .. The newly created commuter lounge has helped. Monica feels that our campus is not very welcoJIling to commuters due to not having enough lounge space, not enough lockers and over crowding in Nazareth Cafe. There is not a good location for students to socialize during the day. Students have been using the Naz.areth Cafe and the 2nd floor of Nazareth Hall. An ideal dining area would consist of being brightly lighted, noise reduction, bigger dish return area and better entry to the cafeteria to eliminate theft problems. Discussion: Larry mentioned that the lounge space and office space issues are consistent with what he found. 5. Dormitories Handout: Phil Lacher, A VP of Physical Plant/ Aux. Services gave his report on the following items. We are beyond the capacity in housing. The College places 4 freshman to a room to adhere to the College's policy of housing students 20 year of age and younger. The actual percent to student housing to FTE is 991 + 41 . 1,032 student housed which is 69% The College will need to invest $13,000 to make the Snelling Terrace pool available to the students. There are no other buildings that are within walking distance to the College. The college was blessed to have the opportunity to buy South, Southeast and Snelling Terrace. There are a couple of medical buildings by Snelling Terrace but the owners of one of the building do not want to sell to NWC at this time. The College's Rcseville Campus PUD (plan unit development) expires August 1, 2001. Phil is currently working with the city on our options. Parking is a big issue. The total number of parking spaces is 1,840. The back area of Riley could be expanded to add 85 more parking spaces but it won't solve the current problem. Discussion: Discussed limiting freshman cars on campus and that the Cabinet and Board would make the final decision. Larry mentioned that limiting parking at colleges is. very COmmon, The committee was interested in finding more- information on parking fees and parking lot maintenance. Note: The committee would like to make a recommendation about limiting parking in their report. Note: Public/private funding should be explored. 6. Athletics Handout: Matt Hill, Athletic Director gave his report on the following items. He currently has 5 areas CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS &. SIRNY ARCHITECTS APP C.6 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE ApPENDIX .. - Reynolds field, Ericksen center, Tennis courts, Riley gym and soccer field. The soccer teams use a field located by Presbyterian Homes. If Presbyterian Homes decides to expand, there would be a huge concern for a soccer field. Tennis courts are excellent. The College doesn't always use 6 courts. Riley gym is used for intramurals. Reynolds field will need to be re'done in the future. Last season, 31 contests were held on the field. Most colleges have two separate fields for soccer and football. There are no lights on the fields so this is a concern if the school day is extended. Installing lights on the field would help student not miss class during the day. One option when redoing the field is to install SprinTurf. It is a less expensive and a better alternative than turf, (see handout) A recreation! student center could serve the needs of the students. It could hold a recreational area, dining lounges. Discussion: Larry brought up that it would be beneficial to consolidate the dining areas to one central location. 7. Science and Mathematics Handout: Dr. Jerry Beilby, Dept, Chair for Science 8e Math gave his report, The development of programs will be in quality once we reach 1600 FTE. See page 2 of handout for space requirement bases on program developments, Nature Trail on campus is a wonderful resource and outdoor classroom. Note: Larry Page will check on what other colleges have considered as a plateau number. We will finish the rest of the reports at the next meeting on Thursday, June 28 at 9:00 a.m. in the BRC - A. 28 June 2001 MEMO TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Campus Master Plan Committee Kay Stroyny, Committee Secretary June 29, 2001 Minutes from June 28, 2001 meeting Present: Dr. Hal Miller, Dr. Barb Lindman, Dr. Gerry Bouma, Jane Goedeke, Phil Lacher, Dr. Doug Huffman, Kay Stroyny, Monica Groves, Dale Sol. CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS APP C.7 NORTH WESTERN COLLEGE ApPENDIX .. Absent: Visitor: berg and Steve Morrow, Bruce Simat and Susan Johnson Dr. Jerry Beilby, Matt Hill and Dr. Tim Tomlinson Larry Page from Partners and Sirny SeveraJ changes were made to the June 21, 2001 minutes. Kay sent the revised minutes to all committee members via e-mail. Susan Johnson from the education department will be submitting her report to Hal Miller. Bruce Simat represented Jerry Beilby's area since he could not attend. 1. Music Handout: Dr. Gerry Bouma, Chair of Music Department gave his report. Rehearsal areas must be able to fit large instruments (including high ceilings). All the music rooms must be equipped with specialized presentation equipment, including pianos and be treated acoustically. Office space - Private lessons are taught in a majority of part.time faculty offices, which becomes a problem when two or more faculty share an office. Sound transference is a big issue when teaching in the middle of other faculty offices. Private lessons may have an impact in the future. Classroom space problems - RehearsaJ time is reduced because time is needed to set up and tear down the room. Music Academy offers private lessons to children in the afternoon and evening (home.schooled, elementary and high school kids). The program is separate from the music department but they use the practice rooms for private lessons. It would be hard to give up this program but it could help free up time and eliminate some of the space problems. Nazareth Hall - It is very difficult to find rehearsal time in the chapel because it is shared with event services. Addressed the need for a lounge in the Fine Arts building. IdeaJ Space Needs: It would be ideaJ to have one classroom available for regular music classes. This classroom would need a presentation space for a piano, stereo and video equipinent. Due to the size of the music department, there should be a minimum of 16 studi%ffices. There are currently 7 studi%ffices alld 9 more are needed. It would be nice to have 3 large rehearsaJ areas on the same level as Maranatha stage (band, choir and rehearsaJ space). It is very difficult to move big items from one floor to the next because not everything fits in the elevator. There is a need for 8.10 additionaJ practice rooms. The department chair's office should be part of the main CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS APP La NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE ApPENDIX .. music office and 3-4 additional offices available for those who don't teach private lessons (band director) Discussion: A short-term solution is decking Nazareth gym and moving the practice modules. The long.term solutionis building a music wing on the southwest side of Maranatha to match the northeast wing. Phil has the Arden Hills master plan that shows where the footprints are located. Gerry, Phil and Larry will meet to sketch out some ideas. The idea of building a balcony in the auditorium was discussed but the whole auditorium would have to be reconfigured and would end up costing a lot of money. The music library has out grown its current space in the basement. 2. Art DeDartment Handout: Hal Miller read Mark Baden's handout. The student population in the department of art and graphic design has been growing since 1992 when visual art education was added to the maJors available at NWC. The number of majors has tripled since 1990, a period of only ten years. (see handout) The art department will need 8 office spaces for 3 full-time and 5 part,time faculty for 2001/2002. The Art department would have enough space if they take over the area used by the music office, practice rooms and choir on first floor. Discussion: Deck Nazareth gym and use the top area for the Art department. Phil will check on the cost of redesigning Nazareth and moving the studios. Hal mentioned tbat the broadcasting area space needs should also be reported. One idea was to move the broadcasting studio to the media building but the problem is the basement is not deep enough. Note: The committee needs to decide what they want to put on the two floors of the new radio building. 3. Event Services Handout: Jane Goedeke, Manager of Event Services gave her report. Last year outside events brought an additional $860,000 into the college. The College nets about 30%. If we forego this money, it can be a serious problem to the COllege. Certain events are more profitable than others. The foodservice/catering has been profitable. CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS APP C.9 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE ApPENDIX .. Maranatha stage - Scheduling for concerts and rehearsals are difficult. Rehearsals usually take place the day prior to the concert causing the stage to be reset for chapel the next day and then again reset for the concert. There is room for 1600 students in the auditorium. The Edge is a student led worship discipleship group. The Edge would prefer to be in the auditorium but it is moved to Nazareth chapel for 10 weeks out of the year because of scheduling conflicts. The Nazareth chapel is not sufficient for setup and the number of students that attend. Nazareth Chapel is in such a high demand between music classes, rehearsals during the week and weddings on weekends. The COllege could schedule fewer weddings if musical performances increased during the school year. One option would be not to schedule weddings during the school year but only during breaks. The idea was brought up for a separate chapel building. The problem is where to put it. Theater- There is a huge scheduling problem for drama vignettes rehearsals. A scene-shop is being built by the ball field. Discussion: Discussed the idea of using the Erickson center for chapeL Jane mentioned that is takes two days to set up the chairs on the floor with the bleachers pulled out to seat 2300 people for graduation day. Students may have a problem associating it as chapel verses a place for athletics. 4. Librarv Handout: Dale Solberg, Director of Library Services gave his report. It has been 8 academic years since moving into the Berntsen building. We have found there isn't nearly enough space for growth. We have moved very aggressively into web-based/electronic formats but the need for the traditional format has not lessened. A 20'year growt.h capacity was determined when the library was built in 1992, however the stacks are now at, and in some areas? over capacity. There is a safety concern when filling the stack full and the space between the stacks has also changed to 42 inches. The lights on the ceiling would have to be changed if the stacks were moved. In 1999, we added Cooperating Libraries in Consortium (CUC) which allows online and physical access to the collections of 13 other libraries. In 2000, the Elmer Anderson Library at the University of Minnesota became available for permanent storage of journals. There is a need for at least 10 public workstations CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHlTECTS APP C10 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE ApPENDIX .. due to converting 12 study carrels to electronic public workstations. The seating capacity seems to be inflated. If one does not count the seats available for specialize/unique usage, there is a seating capacity for oniy about 160 individuals (about 10% of student head count). More faculty and staff offices are needed.. Part of a storage room was convert.ed to a small office. The archive room can only handle a small collection. To accommodate scholars, this room should be doubled or tripled in size. Media Services is located in the lower level of the BRC but it doesn't need to be in the library. Possible Soluuons: Distribute collections to other areas of the campus. Build an attachment or a free standing building on the South end of the current library. Note: Larry will check to see what the new standard number is between the stacks. He will also check on the standards for seat capacity for the library. 5. TechnoloI<V Handout: Steve Morrow, Director of Informauon Technologies gave his report. The teChnology area is scheduled to be renovated in the coming fiscal year. This will allow more room for current growth needs. George Ryon's office will be expanded The restrooms will still be maJntained. Current business office storage will be moved to a storeroom by the president's entrance. Potential growth for staffing needs in Information Systems could happen. Steve wants to get technology bridged with other depart- ments. A good example is Jeff Wahl, he works in the technology department but his office is located in the library. Distributing Education to all classes electronically. (Distance Education) It would be ideal to have a student support space for computer in Snelling TeITace and Southeast residences. The College will be requiring students to bring a laptop, but don't anticipate less lab space needed. There is a need for proper storage areas. AssIgnment for July 17, 2001 meeting: (please bring assIgn- ment to the next meeting) CAMPUS MASTER PLANe PARTNERS &. SIRNY ARCHITECTS APP C.ll NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE ApPENDIX .. Committee members need to come up with a conceptuaJ the building or area they have expressed the need for. don't need to be thinking architecturally but sketch out needs to be in the building and what maybe involved. idea of You what 17 July 2001 MEMO TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Campus Master Plan Committee Kay Stroyny, Committee SecretaJ'Y July 17, 2001 Minutes from July 17, 2001 meeting Present: Dr. HaJ Miller, Dr. Barb Lindman, Matt Hill, Dr. Tim Tomlinson, Dr. SUsan Johnson, Monica Groves, Steve Morrow, Kay Stroyny, Mark Baden and Dr. Jerry Beilby Dr. Gerry Bouma, Jane Goedeke, Phil Lacher, Dr. Doug Huffman, and DaJe Solberg Larry Page Absent: Visitor: The minutes from June 28, 2001 were approved as submitted. Doug Huffman's report was handed out to the committee to review. Deuartment of Education Suace Needs Handout: Dr. Susan Johnson gave her report and noted the follOwing items. The following presuppositions were added for the dept. of education. Upper methods courses are estimated at the current limit of 20 students. Education core classes estimated at current limit of 25 students. Classrooms for methodology courses need to be set up with tables. Education courses cannot be limited to 8 - 3 p.m. They aJso have days off-campus for cooperating school placements. GeneraJ Purpose Classroom There has been a 23% growth rate in the education dept. We will need the ability to schedule at least 10 sections of classes per term in a computer lab. The Riley gym is currently a back up space for activities. The Blue Room and Youderian Lounge have aJso been used but scheduling is difficult and unreliable do to events. Specialized Classrooms , We currently have 3 classrooms designated for elementaJ'Y CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS &- SIRNY ARCHITECTS APP C.12 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE ApPENDIX .. education/ESL/general methods. Two more additional class' rooms are needed for ,a total of 5 classrooms. Faculty Offices - Recommend an additional 5 full-time offices and 4 part-time offices The education office is required to keep licensure files on each student, so additional space is needed for storing files. Child Development Center Recommends assigning 3 offices in the new media building. One for the director and 2 offices for full time teachers. Plus having a conference space in the new media building. Discussion: Hal Miller mentioned they have to be carefully when designating a lot of offices in the new media building due to parking issues. Student Development Handout: Monica reported ideas for adding a new service building on campus. It would be ideal to have it in the center of campus. Option One: A building between Riley and the dorms that would contain the service offices, campus dining and could be connected with a field house. It would be ideal to have only one cafe on campus. It would be easier for trucks to deliver to the cafe if the main road was moved. Parking would be a big issue especiaJIy if there is a main entrance to this building. Option 2: A separate building between Riley and Nazareth containing the cafe and services offices. Discussion: Larry mentioned if the main road route were changed it would keep the center of the campus pedestrian friendiy. The PUD footprints of the dormitory would mainly affect the placing of the field house. Classroom space could be available in the building. Monica mentioned the admissions office should be more accessible on campus. Larry mentioned this would draw more traffic to the area and could be a problem. He suggested a separate building woUld be a better option. The cafeteria could be on the second floor and would have a better view, Athletic Handout: Matt's idea is to build a field house where the tennis courts are located. This is assuming the Riley gym is decked for classroom and faculty offices. The field house could be connected to the service building. CAMPUS MASTER PI,AN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS APP C.B NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE ApPENDIX .. The building would be 160' X 300'. The building would be about the size of Bethel's field house. The floor of the field house would include locker rooms, lines for volleyball, tennis and basketball. Discussion: We could have a problem with the city on the visual aspect of the building and parking if we build a separate building. It would depend on how it is presented to the city neighbors, The powerhouse is a good location but it would cost too much to move it. A trade off with the neighbors to get what we want could be to make the lake front more appealing to the neighbors. Deoartment of Science and Math Handout: The Breccia project could work but it is not ideal. A better option would be to build a separate building 200 feet away from little Lake Johanna on the West Side of the Powerhouse. A new building could contain 5 labs, 4 project labs, 3 lab prep/storerooms, 10 faculty offices, department computer lab, 2 admin offices, animaJ room and 2 medium classrooms. Discussion: to the KTIS could be an Hal mentioned if the education department moves area and Focus moves out then maybe tills space option for science and math. The next, meeting is on Thursday, July 19, 2001 in the Youderian Lounge. 19 July 2001 MEMO TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Campus Master Plan Committee Kay Stroyny, Committee Secretary July 19, 2001 Minutes from July 19, 2001 meeting Present: Dr. Hal Miller, Dr. Barb Lindman, Matt Hill, Dr. Tim 'r~mlinson, Dr. Susan Johnson, Monica Groves, Steve Morrow, Kay Stroyny, Mark Baden, Jane Goedeke, Dr, Gerry Bouma, Dr. Doug Huffman and Dr. Jerry Beilby Phil Lacher and Dale Solberg Larry Page Absent: Visitor: CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS APt> C.14 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE ApPENDIX .. Hal mentioned the centennial campaign would be divided into 2 phases. The first phase will include the media building, so the committee will not have to rush to complete their report. Music Deoartment Handout: Gerry Bouma presented adding a wing to the, Fine Arts building. The ceiling in the instrumental rehearsal room will need to be higher than normaL The choral rehearsal room could also be used as a small recitai room if needed. The rehearsal rooms are mostly used in the afternoon. The classrooms in the new wing addition could be also be used for general-purpose classes since they would not be used aJI the time. It would cost $178,000 to instaJI 7 new practice rooms in the new wing. The top floor of the wing would have studi%ffice space for teachers. It would cost $38,535 to relocate the present practice rooms to the Nazareth gym. The College would be responsible to remove the fire sprinklers and have the Nazareth floor ready for the practice rooms. The company would provide a supervisor for 10 days, but the College would have to provide 10 people and trucks to move the units. Discussion: If this wing was added, the music office could evacuate their present area leaving it open for the art department. Jane mentioned there could be problems fitting 1700 students in the auditorium. Usually, during the first month of school, students have to sit on the floor for chapel in the auditorium. A closed circuit overflow area could be set up for chapel, but the equipment would need to be purchased. The space above the event services area could be made into offices for event services if the new wing is built. There was concern that there is not an elevator in the wing proposal. Hal mentioned storage space is also a high concern for departments. Media Buildine: Ideas: Susan mentioned her ideas for the new media building. . 3 classrooms for 20 - 25 students with tables for the CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS API' c.n . NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE ApPENDIX .. education department 1 computer lab 3 offices Conference room Tim Tomlinson suggested that Focus would need about 3,000 square feet in the new building. Classroom Conference room Computer lab HaJ suggested that Tim and Susan meet to coordinate ideas. Information Technololties: VerticaJ storage space is needed in the media building for LT. Eventually more office space will be needed for the information system staff. The offices should be in close proximity cf each other. New Service Buildine: Discussion: It would be ideal to have all the service departments (financial aid, business office, bookstore, admissions, ete) together. A one.stop shop for students. The cafe area should be kept separate from the service area. The building would have meeting rooms not classrooms. There is some concern for having only one kitchen on campus and that it would be in a separate building away from the Blue Room. The blue room could have a warming kitchen, however the quality of food may suffer. The Nazareth infill building would eliminate the kitchen dilemma. Larry mentioned by adding the infill it will change the ascetics of the building. Students may need more time to pass between classes depending where this building is located. Parking would be a problem if the building were built between the dorms and Riley. Decking Riley would cost $1.5 million and would gain 11 ,000 square feet. There would be more activity on that side of campus if the Riley gym were decked, _ The ALF A center and music practice rooms could be moved to the 2n<1 floor of the gym. Matt mentioned that the athletic department would have to cut back on activities if the gym was decked. Parkine:. Discussion: Limiting freshman parking on campus. Larry mentioned that limiting parking at colleges is very common. CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS &: SlRNY ARCHITECTS APP L16 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE ApPENDIX .. If students could get paid higher wages on campus, then students could work on campus and not need a car. The department of education demands sophomores to have a vehicle. Parkillg and lounges are a retention issue for students especially for co=uters. Mark B. would rather expand the parking lots to accom, modate the nurr,oer of students than to limit the number of cars because it affects the quaJity of life. The College may have to provide more activities for students if more students are here on weekends, The committee would like to find out what the current parking fee is to obtain a permit and parkillg lot priority. The next step: Larry Page handed out a preIiminary project outline to the committee. Larry would like the committee members to develop their own department goals. A handout will be sent out before the September meeting to help develop these goals. A draft report will be developed from the department goals. The goals will determine prioritize. The next meeting will be held in September. The date and time of the meeting has not been set. 30 October 2001 MEMO TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Campus Master Plan Committee Kay Stroyny, COmmittee, Secretary October 30, 2001 Minutes from October 30, 2001 Present: Dr. Hal Miller, Dr. Barb Lindman, Dr. Tim Tomlinson, Monica Groves, Mark Baden, Jane Goedeke, Dr, Gerry Bouma, Dr. .Doug Huffman and Dr. Jerry Beilby Absent: Matt Hill, Dr, Susan Johnson and Steve Morrow New Members: Asa Ferguson and Kevin Robinson Guest: Larry Page, Partners and Sirny Architects Handouts: Sample overview of XYZ College Campus Master Plan Goal Setting - Collegiate Institutional Planning CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SlRNY ARCHITECTS APP C.17 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE -, ApPENDIX .. HaJ Miller mentioned that the campus master plan committee is to move forward with Phase II. The question arose if the Nazareth gym would be decked this summer. The gym would probably not be decked due to budget needs. GOAIB Be OBJECTIVES: Larry Page told the committee that the next step in developing the master plan is to gather goaJs and objectives. In order to develop your goaJs and objectives, the committee will need to look at a 5 - 7 year period and a 15 - 30 year period. You may already have some department goaJs gathered from previous meetings as well as from reviewing the strategic plan. Larry passed out sample handouts for the committee to review. Once the goaJs and objectives are completed, Larry will assemble aJl the information into one single document. The next step will be for the committee to prioritize the items. Larry will gather together the academic goals and show how they will affect the facillty aspect of the campus. Any objective conflicts in Larry's finaJ document will be noted and discussed with the committee. Larry mentioned the campus master plan is a good communication tool that will help get the word out to the constituents and convey to the board the justification of these expenses. The committee may want to involve a member of the board after Larry has gathered aJl the information into one report. HaJ confirmed to the committee that the board is committed to the campus master plan. HaJ will be in touch will the committee members to tell them their assignment. Next Meeting . TEA CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS APP CIS ApPENDIX .. The following pages include meeting minutes from meetings during the second phase of planning, 27 May 2003 A meeting of the Campus Master Plan Committee of Northwest- ern College was convened on Tuesday, May 27, 2003 at 1:10 p.m. in the Youderian Lounge. Members Present: Doug Schroeder Barb Lindman Tim Tomlinson Rod Loeffler Cheryl Seiffert Steve Morrow Matt Hill Jane Goedeke Mark Baden Dan Crane Jobn Delich Dale Solberg Monica Groves Doug Huffman Gerry Bouma Asa Ferguson Randy Riesberg Ruth Ball Guest Present: Mr. Larry Page, Partners 8e Sirny Doug Schroeder called the meeting to order and opened in prayer. An introduction of the committee members took place. Doug Schroeder gave an overview of the Campus Master Plan Committee. Agendas were distributed. Doug Schroeder shared with the Committee that the previous CMF group was designed to focus on 1600 students. Dr. Cureton and the Long Range Strategic Planning Committee is focusing on 2400 FTE's by 2020. We have been growing at a rate slightly above 4%, which would bring us to the growth of 2400 by 2017. We need to look at slowing down the growth rate. Doug Schroeder gave the charge of the Campus Master Plan Committee and introduced Larry Page from Partners and Sirny and also read a memo from Dr. Hal Miller, tpe co'chair of the committee, who was unable to attend due to a scheduling conflict. Dr. Miller's memo shared his thoughts on the campus master plan process and the time frame for the balance of 2003. Doug Schroeder asked if any members of the previous CMF Committee had any comments relating to previous work done by the Committee. Discussion took place on the need to do major adjustments from 1600 to the 2400. The need to look at our programs some will NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS APP C.19 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE ApPENDIX .. be based on facility necessity. Our thinking needs to change. We need to think outside of the box. The question was asked if the campus is large enough to handle 2400 F'PE? Doug Schroeder addressed the Committee with some thoughts of growth and that the campus could handle the 2400 F'PE with qualifications. Discussion took place about the North Minneapolis campus and Oak Hills from previous CMF meetings and the possible options of an off site campus. Doug Schroeder turned the meeting over to Larry Page. Larry gave an overview of how the planning process can have a domino affect. Academic, Facilities and Finance aJl go together for campus planning. In our thinking and planning, Larry would like us to focus not on just our areas but the campus as a whole and how that will be affected with a FTE of 2400 driven by academics. Once those things have been determined then we can focus on the support services. Look at your programs from where they have been and the demographics. The demographics are leveling off. NWC has a unique product, which we have to keep in mind as well. We need to keep the mission of the organiZation in mind and plan around that. Projections of FTE's 2400- some adjustments of facilities on campus would need to be made and an addition of a new building(s). Larry Page mentioned a discussion with himself and Dr. Cureton about the Powerhouse and the loss of that building and the possibilities of building a student center there. There would be compliances with the DNR, building and city ordinance to consider. Doug Schroeder mentioned the defeI'Ped maintenance study of the campus. The older campus buildings of Nazareth and Riley are OK to remodel except the Powerhouse, These buildings need to be renovated, so how do we do that while continuing to grow? CUI'Pently we have a 15 million dollar defeI'I'Bd maintenance deficit. How do we bring the buildings up to spec while maintaining CUI'Pent service levels? Larry Page shared what he would like to see the CMF group accomplish. How will academic programs expand? What programs would we consider offering? How much classroom space or lab space is needed? Larry mentioned the need to look at the market place and what is being offered, Larry discussed what options we have as far as building a facility to hold the 2400 students for chapel or do we hold a couple of services along with pOSSible options for food services. Larry mentioned central scheduling software. He mentioned high schools and block scheduling, time scheduling CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS &: SIRNY ARCHITECTS APP C.ZD NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE ApPENDIX .. and addlng hours. Larry suggested we start by looking at the FTE's by academic disciplines. What facilities do we need right away? Doug Schroeder asked Larry to share how he would work with the group, and what he would expect of us to bring back to the group. Larry will meet with each committee member individually to discuss space needs. Larry will challenge us to explain why we need or do not need the space and why we project what we do for the area in discussion, keeping in mind the campus as a whole. Support functions will then be looked at_ Larry will put together a plan for discussion. The Committee will then meet to discuss the plan priorities. Doug Schroeder asked the Committee for comments and reactions. A question regardlng the capital campaign and time frame was raised. It was Mr. Schroeder's belief that Dr. Cureton would like to see the kick-off in 2004 and work it in parallel with the LRSP. Is there an interim plan if the College keeps growing at this pace and our CMP is not in place? Doug Schroeder addressed that some short.term options have been considered includlng renting space off campus or the use of temporary classroom units. However, student'dining space will become an increasingly difficult problem to overcome in the short run. The question arose again as to whether 2400 would fit on this campus. Yes, with qualifications. The campus now can only hold 1600; we are past capacity now and need to do something. There was a concern mentioned of trying to work on a moving target. Are we ever going to arrive at the place where we have met the building need? Doug Schroeder commented that a new leader is usually brought in to help grow the organization not to maintain it. It is the responsibility of the President to work with the Trustees to establish the overall and long.term growth goaJs for the organization. Larry Page mentioned that the Committee would need to test any changes against the mission of the COllege. Does the city of Roseville and Arden Hills know where we are headed? Yes, Doug Schroeder and Larry Page have met with city officials and will have further meetings. Comment was made regardlng how educating is changing; that in 10 years we may not educate like we do now. There may be more online classes and technology will continue to bring about significant changes in the education process. Larry Page mentioned to look at student profile. A question was raised regarding a graduate school and what total number of students would we be looking at includlng Alternative Education CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS AI'P C.21 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE ApPENDIX .. enrollments? Doug Schroeder shared that a total number of 4000 students has been discussed as part of the LRSP. Doug Schroeder asked Ruth Ball to work with Larry Page to schedule appointments with the Committee members over the next couple of weeks. The Committee will meet as a whole the beginning of July once Larry Page has assembled the data together. Look at this as a framework for development with flexibility. Look at things now to 10 years and then 25 to 75 years and how capital funding will play a part. Doug shared the "good" problem that Notre Dame has (people standing in line to pay for campus buildings) and what a good problem to pray for that NWC would have. Barb Lindman closed in prayer. Meeting adjourned 2:20 pm. 10 July 2003 A meeting of the Campus Master Plan Committee of Northwest. ern College was convened on Tuesday, May 27, 2003 at 1:10 p,m. in the Youderian Lounge. Members Present: Members Absent: Doug Schroeder Matt Hill Asa Ferguson Hal Miller Jane Goedeke Doug Huffman Tim Tomlinson Mark Baden Jerry Bielby (for Dan Crane) Cheryl Seiffert John Delich Randy Riesberg Steve Morrow Michael Ek Ruth Ball Monica Groves Barb Lindman Dale Solberg Guest Present: Mr. Larry Page, Partners lie Sirny Dr. Miller called the meeting to order and Jane Goedeke opened in prayer. Doug Schroeder shared a few opening comments and turned the meeting over to Larry Page. Larry thanked the Committee for working with him the past couple of weeks. He mentioned how pleasing it was to see how well people worked together for the good of NWC and not just for their own area needs. Larry shared an aerial view of the campus to show how tight the campus is along with a graph CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS APP C.22 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE ApPENDIX .. that shows we are limited on space. Larry also shared a map of the current facilities and utility services on campus and a site constraints map which shows the set back from the lake. According to the DNR, the set back is required to be 75 feet. The powerhouse is on that set back currently. The map showed city set backs as welL For the NWC campus there are no currently established or agreed zoning standards other than for those that exist for residential housing, so there wili need to be additional discussion with the city regarding zoning restrictions. We wili need to watch the usage and campus activity along the property line to the east due to residential sensitivity. We will also need to have more holding ponds on campus as the ordinance has changed since the last building projects. Discussion took place on moving one of the current ponds beyond Maranatha to place a building there. There are some elevation issues, which would be a future discussion that would need to include an engineer. The right of way area will need to be looked at as well. Larry made his presentation, sharing the proposed plan vs. the existing. (See attachments) The only open areas to consider currently are some building areas by the tennis court and by the old drive in to campus. Larry had to consider utility feeds, set backs, aesthetics, and parking, in addition to the growth factor. A mall concept with consideration for changing the road and parking was shared, along with possible sites for student residence halls. An athletic field house was discussed, however more time and attention will need to be spent on Athletics to evaluate their needs. Larry will be following up with Matt Hill regarding their needs. Discussion took place regarding the general use of the Mall, the parking structure, new buildings vs. remodeling, residence halls, events and athletics. The Committee in general was in favor of the Mall concept and thought that it would be very appealing. The building of a dorm that was previously approved by the city has expired and NWC will need to reapproach the city for that structure. The scale of the housing can be kept minimized compared to an academic building. Discussion as to the zoning of NWC and rezoning the campus as one part academic and one residential or institutional zoning took place. The Committee was encouraged to share the proposal in general with their co-workers, however they were cautioned to keep the information shared in this meeting confidential and that it is not to be shared with those outside of the campus community. We do not want to jeopardize any work NWC will need to do with the cities of Arden Hills and Roseville. Handicap accessibility needs were discussed. Further evaluation as to what to do with the mechanical facilities of the campus will need to be done. Should each building be free standing as some buildings are or a central place for the whole CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS &. SIRNY ARCHITECTS APP C.23 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE ApPENDIX .. campus. It will be important for the buildings to be attractive however economical. There are several items that require further evaluation. Dr. Miller addressed the target number for our growth. Mr. Schroeder addressed the growth number vs. the city of Roseville and Arden Hills. Discussion tcok place regariling South Campus and student housing in Snelling Terrace and the need for Larry to do additional work on this area. The Committee discussed the parking proposed. Is it possible tc put in some parking behind Maranatha instead of where the tennis courts are? What about parking in both locations? Larry will evaluate the possibilities. The use of the island property was mentioned and the need to see about incorporating that into the plan. Can we make it a park? Jerry Bielby discussed the buckthorn project and how we can incorporate the island by making it a small arboretum; make it attractive so people will use it. Dr. Miller suggests that we add the island into the final Master Plan. Larry Page will evaluate the possibilities for use of the island property. The next step for the Committee will be tc take the proposed proposal tc your co-workers and share their ideas and thoughts when we meet again. Larry will continue to work on the evaluation of some of the areas mentioned along with reworking the proposal based on a few suggestions given. The next meeting is scheduled for August 7 at 9 a.m. Mr. Schroeder closed in prayer. Meeting adjourned 11 :25 28 August 2003 A meeting of the Campus Master Plan Committee of Northwest- ern College was convened on Thursday, Augu~t 28, 2003 at 9:00 a.m. in the Youderian Lounge. Members Present: Members Absent: Doug Schroeder Asa Ferguson Jane Goedeke Tim Tomlinson Matt Hill Hal Miller Doug Huffman Mark Baden John Delich Dan Crane Randy Riesberg CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS APP C.24 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE ApPENDIX .. Dale Solberg Monica Groves Steve MoPPOw Ruth Ball Cheryl Seiffert Barb, Lindman Michael Ek Guest Present: Mr. Larry Page, Partners 8e SiPny Doug Schroeder called the meeting to order and opened in prayer. Doug mentioned that Larry Page had made a presentation to the President's cabinet this week and it was well received. Hal Miller mentioned that the Campus Master Plan will be shared With the Board of Trustees at the December meeting. August 7, 2003 minutes were reviewed and approved. Larry Page presented the new proposed plan that encompassed the recommendations from precious Campus Master Plan meet- ings. This was the proposed plan that was presented to the President's Cabinet. Larry noted the changes, which included the drive by the field house and the south part of the campus. A question proposed dealing with a road that at one time went along the property line to the west. This road is no longer there or in use.. There was discussion about the intersection by the ball field and the possibility of moving it slightly to give more space. There was a brief discussion regarding the scene shop and where it was shown on the plan and where it would be relocated in the future. The original entrance gate will be maintained as a symbolic entrance. Larry shared briefly about the walk bridge and design that would go over Snelling. This , would require discussion and planning with the city of Roseville. There are also ADA regulations that impact this suQject. DOug Schroeder mentioned the added plan of the decking of the Riley Gym. This is in current discussion at the Cabinet leveL This would be two levels With approximately an additional 14,000 of finished space. There is most likely asbestos issues that will need to be addressed. The goal would be as we deck the Riley Gym that we raise the money for the field house and other athletic field needs. The need for an elevator in Riley was discussed. Larry Page mentioned, once you do an area of a building you need to bring up to code the area surrounding it. Discussion took place regarding continued growth and how it will be addressed when things get tight as we go through the process. A transition plan needs to be established for Biology, Music; some of the specialty academics. Discussion of class schedules took place and the need to redesign the schedule to fit the needs. Additionally, there will be HVAC/utllity issues CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS APP C.25 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE ApPENDIX .. going fOPWaJ'd, as welL When the Community Life Center is built on the MaJI aJ'ea, the tunnel between Riley and Naz would be cut in half. These changes would encompass the HVAC changes. A lengthy discussion took place regaJ'ding the current tunnels on campus and do we have a need for additional tunnels in some areas? How much do the students really, use the tunnels? Larry noted that tunnels aJ'e very costly to do. Asa mentioned the concern we currentiy have with the tunnels involving mold and water issues. Larry mentioned the mold issue and how that is an increasing possibility of lawsuits. The committee had mixed feelings on the tunnels around the Mall area. Hal Miller recommend if anything, a tunnel from the dorm end to the academic end of campus. Hal recommended that during the final plan design a decision be made about the pathways between the buildings and that we should stay consistent in our look. It is imperative to use the current below ground areas as to help keep the campus from looking crowded. Hal recommended that we list the pros and cons of the tunnels in our report. Doug Schroeder mentioned the garage for the vans in the Riley building. Doug would expect those gaJ'ages to be able to be remodeled sometime in the future and the vans moved elsewhere. Utility issues were discussed. They should be looked at when we get to that point in the plan. Larry recommended that we look at keeping the image of the COllege as a maJ'ket point and invest our money there instead. Larry Page's closing comment regarding the proposed plan is to keep in mind the mission of the college. The committee reviewed the Preliminary Recommendation Draft report for the items that were added from the last CMP meeting: Item #7, 10 C, llE, llF, 12F, 20, 22, 27, 32, 33, 34, 41, 43, 52, 53, and 55. Changes made or additional additions to the Preliminary Recommendation Draft Report: Confirm the property lines and the acreage. Historical Preservation..... the oity prooess would involve zoning; Institutional zone vs. the PUD. The annex issue will need to be addressed. This would also be an added recommendation. 121 State building codes and ADA codes are slightly different dealing with handicap. Environmental buildings was explained by Larry; certification process. Recommend that we consider these when planning. CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS APP C26 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE ApPENDIX .. 12E add telecom and other systems 18 use the word "real estate" instead 19 add the word "Alternative" 28 COlTect Maranatha # to be 1500 capacity. Chapel, Marantha music wing to be an over flow for chapel or a recital hall. Recommend maybe sound proofing ~ec~~cls ' 35 add Horizontal wiring 42 "planned" 54 is similar to #28 - combine 56 add defelTed maintenance plan 57 assets and sister colleges 64 "college," "'committed," remove <<'of the" Larry requested to discuss Item 14, the charge back system. Larry explained the system is referring more about a rental space type charge back. Hal recommended using the word allocation; Develop a system for allocating space assets. Next step for Larry will be to sit down and do a cost analyze on the plan. Motion was made to accept ~e proposed plan and preIiminary recommendation Motion seconded. Hal Miller ~anked Larry for his services to Northwestern College. Larry commented again on what a pleasure it was to work with us. Monica Groves closed in prayer. Committee adjourned Meeting adjourned = END OF MEETING MINUTES CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SiRNY ARCHITECTS APP C.21 '-.' ~, ~' NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE "'----, CAMPUS STlJDIES .. CAMPUS STUDIES CAMPUS MASTER P"LAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS APPENDIX D NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE ApPENDIX IIiJI CAMPUS STUDIES Insert List of Non-Facilities related Campus Studies (primarily aca- demic) . Self Study(date?) Available where? . etc. Available where . \e'l5's "?>.\e'- ,,~, ~~o, o\,,'i' . o.e \\'0\ 2s-ecv.- O>l~ 000. ~\o'i'~ \le"'b ;\ -1: j. '(). . ;r."\ l' \0 0.0 ~~~~~ ~e ~ :\,-,. '().~ :}.\o.o'i'e .\~"s'i' eo'i'\~~"\,,J:e tv \C" '0,,\' ~,,\'i' -es"" :'\) '(). "c"o.e'l5' e1'\"t'l' . s. SO s'rY-o.~ l'>s'f.- "t'\>'l'f.- e\etf' .1;.-3s>\e. s\"o.,e >1\0"'0 I..'i'-{IJ." \:Ie'l5'e\'l\ \j; ,,'l'" :,e'l"1'\ e 0\ 'i'te '0 ei' "'~" 1;.\ te ","~ etf' . \'l "'0\" te" \\ se 'let' .,0." te" . \0 ~o\)> ",'rY- ."'e'l5' \\'0\ \"J:' '0 ~e ,- e\ .,,' t" 'f.\1' \o'b _ ."s\e ",ot ~ete l'>w ""'b 0. '" ~"- ,," "W ~\e.' , ,,'\>" ,,'l CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS API' D.l NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE ApPENDIX CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS .. APP D.Z ~, NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE FACILITIES DATA & RESOURCES .. FACILITY DATA & RESOURCES CAMPUS MASTER PLAN ~ARTNERS & SIRNY ARCHITECTS . APPENDiX' E ApPENDIX .. FACILITIES DATA & RESOURCES Insert List of Facilities related Studies such as . Deferred Maintenance Plan (date?) . 5 Year Plan (date? . Space Utilization Study (2001) . Maintenance Schedules . Site Survey (including utilities) (date?) . Mech/Elec Systems studies . etc. . . \\e"$-'" .'(}.\.e <j~~ l' <)'\9' .~'" ,,,.1" ~o 0' "''1'''''. \\",\ ,,~' N\o.e &ce <)~o \e'l' ~ \0' ".\">' <'tO~~~".'I'o.->" .>( V 0# ~S~ &",e",<IJ j:>' I<-~'O' ~~. ~~'i \.1''0->'' ~'i'".\ e"'\'i \o~ "w,,\ .p' ,,\'1' 0. ~ec ~0~T- 'boo ,,,.~'b,,,,,e"$-' 'De'" '01" de\ ",,\0 '-'0'" \0" ~o~e ~,. Ir>e~e ,-,,,.'" I' ol'\e 0. ~ '\~ ",e ".~ \ ~ .,-,,,.\, ",\e, " 'D~ ",0 ". ".~".v \".~" "e"" e"'~ "$-e'l' ~lY ".'\ e\e \'" "",,,.\ "$-e\'i ~e~& o.\e'" ei-""'" ~\ 'I" ",ocJ' -"'''' ,-"",\ '0"'-'" e". ",\e. '0.' ", \,\ ",e ~".-v,"'v ~o"'-' 0\ I'~e \",'" 1\# ~".~e _ ~#\e~ ".~e ". f..~' \\l-~e "",e'-" NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SJRNY ARCHITECTS APP E.l NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE ApPENDIX CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS &: SIRNY ARCHITECTS .. APP E.2 Note: A lager 11 x 17 version oflhis pJan is inserted at the end of the Master Plan. NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE IMPLEME:N"TATION IIDI Development Framework q PROPOSED ---::.~'-- -- ---. EXISTING <~J)--.. ["J~nd ClwJl<'l and Natu",ReHlUKl' ,0,1 ~~~-"'" ArtBuilding&~CIllptu~Tl'ITaCl' ::~~~"'/~~:;r~~; '~\ ::::~,:~;:::< "I.. ./..(:~~~?i:h'.i"""-""-'1i;~"&; Uamtl'llimml.L ~'::~l' --~~~~~~/.~';;f "~' ,~,:'i/;"~,\~ 01 B.,msk>"R""au;~;t~~: Co~"";" Uk c.~,,,;;' \i,' , ,"'.'. -'~>c:'>, /:. ~ ~:=~~lJ'O"(>/ "- ~~-~=;,;~<_.\~>.-~<,,< \^-",o'-U, :'4~:\).SF/31_"""'I" ,;" -----.--., ". ./A0:.~,.^:,c"" , II I l..ilo",I')' Ad,;'!>",,, _____,;-< A'; 'Y" , -. 14-(WCSF/31.."'.....J" I \~\; ,', /1/, / \1,', -, ""~ -",.,:/ I \\..; >// .~:~ .~ " ,""',,:~ .[ i'J .~~ h.,,",T,_.Cwrl> "--- --.ti,~&-I.,"~''''';,,~ .g, .. .~.'.-. S"..J, ...,:~:~~:: i~i;~~~~: I,--"~-~~' I' II. '","B,,," A''''''''f"W,'''m',~", , ." :''-' '... if-I. , ,"'"'hTff~;;~;: ~~~~~~;~~:~ ~~~I~~{C~:~;~ ,I,'" '\~'. ''"--. Iii!,' ,!t:..D,~.D, O="ro, -:' () ~-, ',Ii. .- ii' .. ~293l?Snl'l!ms u___ '" C',\., d1j,/ if b~ I " B... __J\ -""~~;~~"-I-~i~tJ,,"q ... ......,. "" ,I, J~ ,~, . -G <~~?,,\~/j'j,l.i :,;1.... ii t:Jl '-;"1) \\1 I i;>Jj;.j ":' :il ,jl" r,. i Dmmilmy -~------~--7-'7'!-'., I' ,- 1t_3ltSndh", ;~,.\(~~~"t ':(i! ill, J- 6 ed. '/' "!/;I Do="'~ i:':::~,t(>. II; r:,!~tP-u-~y~.~n;~~ I ..' " :\-.1 '_.....J t,!). N.,.--"r~thH.]] l~i50CSF Riko,' HaJJ 4'J.c.95GSF Do><k0'm..ddll.'JUOASI' -:''1i-:T~tf.';'';7~~I;''';'"'"i l'",kil,;;2u,,,,,Is~_~_ l""l"od<-+I_<lIDn:l~~) 4'1O'Stal15 .~~~~~'.?.!t.___'_"M_ . 55IY-B,..;,,/3L..,"PI. PedestJiJnBJidge N<,wDormitoJ)' :;;usneiiinglnfill \!5'B...J./3'L.>...,I" LLf'..J;.~ Campus Master Plan Scope ffi CAMPUS MASTER PLAN PARTNERS & SlRNY ARCHITECTS PAGE 6.2 Northwestern College Master Plan Northwestern College Roseville and Arden Hills, Minnesota Stormwater Management Study TKDA Submitted: Revised: Revised: Project No. i~ ^~ ^,~,.__~""""=0""~ ENGINEERS' ARCHITECTS' PLANNERS November 15, 2006 January 18, 2007 Augusl 27, 2007 13529.000 444 Cedar Street, Suile 1500 SainI Paul, MN 55101,2140 (651)292.4400 (651) 292.00B3 fax www.tkda.com NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE MASTER PLAN STORMWATER MANAGEMENT STUDY TKDA PROJECT NO. 13529.000 T ABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO. SECTION I. SECTION II. SECTION III. SECTION IV. SECTION V. SECTION VI. SECTION VII. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION.......................... ..............................................,.... ................... 2 HYDROLOGIC AND RESOURCE INVENTORY ................................................4 PROBLEM ASSESSMENT. ,.,..........,.......................,. __..__, ......, .................... .......6 REGU LATIONS............................................... .......................... .........................9 A. Current RCWD Stormwater Rules ..............................................................9 B. Proposed RCWD Stormwater Rules .........................................................10 C. RCWD Wetland Rules ..................................................................,...........11 D. County Rules............................................................................................12 E. State Rules..........................................,.............................".....................12 F. Municipal Rules ......__.........,......................................................................12 CONCEPTUAL PLAN FOR SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT.....................13 A. Wet Detention Ponds................................................................................ 13 B. Pollution Prevention,.................................................................................14 C. Pervious pavements ...."""'........................,......__....,....,...........................14 D. Infiltration.... .......................,....'...... __.,.............................. ........... .............. 14 E. Filters and Sumps.....................................................................................14 GOALS AND POLICIES ".....................__."..."..__.......... .......................... .......... 20 A. Water Quantity ........,.."",__..'.................................. """".........................20 B. Water Quality.................. ........ .................. ...... ......... .................................20 C. Natural Resources................,....................................................... ..... ....... 20 D. Wetlands ........'..........,................... .........................,.................... ............. 21 E. Erosion Control..................... .......................................... ...., ...__................ 21 F. Public Participation, Information and Education........................................21 G. Monitoring...... __............................................ ............................ ........ ........ 21 H. Maintenance and Inspection.....................................................................22 I. Finance.................... ..................... ,.................................................. ........22 Northwestern College Master Plan Stormwater Management Study 13529.000 PAGE NO. SECTION VIII. IMPLEMENTATION... ........ ..... ........ ....................... ...... ... ............... ...................22 A. Public Education and Outreach ................................................................22 B. Public Participation/Involvement. .... ......... ........ ............ ................ .............22 C. Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination ................................................23 D. Construction Site Runoff Control ..............................................................23 E. Post-Construction Runoft Control.............................................................23 F. Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping ................................................23 APPENDIX PAGES Wetland Delineations.................. .......... .......... ...... ...... .......... ...... ........ ..................... ........... ........2 City of Roseville Regulations ......................................................................................................6 Rice Creek Watershed District Regulations ................................................................................5 NPDES Construction Regulations.. ...... ... ...... .......... .............. ........... ... ....... ..... .......... ...... ..........18 Best Management Practices.......................... ........... ......... ......................... ....... .........................8 FIGURES PAGE NO. Figure NO.1: Existing Drainage Features ...................................................................................3 Figure NO.2: Lake Johanna Water Level Reading......................................................................5 Figure NO.3: Lake Johanna Water Quality Data.........................................................................5 Figure NO.4: Campus Master Plan.............................................................................................8 Figure NO.5: Proposed BMPs Map North Half of Campus........................................................ 16 Figure No. 5A: Proposed BMPs Map North Half of Campus Revised........................................ 17 Figure NO.6: Proposed BMPs Map South Half of Campus ......................................................18 Figure No. 6A: Proposed BMPs Map North Half of Campus .....................................................19 Northwestern College Master Plan Slormwater Management Study ii 13529.000 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE MASTER PLAN STORMWATER MANAGEMENT STUDY I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Nazareth Hall Preparatory Seminary opened in September 1923 as a four-year high school and two-year junior college for candidates for diocesan priesthood. Its 87-acres were purchased from the Archdiocese of Saint Paul/Minneapolis by Northwestern College in 1970. Today, the College's natural environment is largely a function of its two lakes, Johanna and Litlle Johanna, which occupy a large part of the total land area of the campus. Both lakes are identified as impaired on Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's March 31, 2004, proposed Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) list. Lake Johanna is classified as eutrophic and exhibits water levels from a high of 881.27 feet on July 3,1978, to 870.35 feet on July 21,1926, or a range of 10.92 feet, and its Ordinary High Water levei is 878 feet. Little Lake Johanna has very little published information. This Plan presents a campus-wide Stormwater Management strategy that identifies Best Management Practices that can be implemented to facilitate the campus redevelopment. The overall goal is to cooperate with appropriate agencies including the Cities of Roseville and Arden Hills, Rice Creek Watershed District and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to improve the quality of both of the campus lakes. Achievement of these goals will deliver good quality stormwater runoff from the campus to lakes and wetlands at acceptable rates and volumes, while reducing pollutant and sediment loadings and stream bed/stream bank erosion and water quality degradation. Stormwater quality and quantity Best Management Practices (BMPs) that seem particularly appropriate for the campus include: wet detention ponds; pollution prevention such as material storage control, turi management, parking lot cleaning; pervious pavements to reduce the amount of runoff; infiltration practices and filter devices which primarily trap solids that have pollutants attached to them. In some respects, the implementation of the Plan described in this document will resemble a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program requires of many Cities including Roseville and Arden Hills. Such a plan has six elements: Northwestern College Master Plan Stormwaler Management Study 1 13529.000 . Public Education and Outreach . Public Participation/Involvement . Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination . Construction Site Runoff Control . Post-Construction Runoff Control . Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping II. INTRODUCTION Nazareth Hall Preparatory Seminary opened in September 1923 as a four-year high school and two-year junior college for candidates for diocesan priesthood. Its 87 -acres were purchased from the Archdiocese of Saint Paul/Minneapolis by Northwestern College in 1970. Moyer Hall was built as an on-campus residence hall in 1973. In 1980, the Hartill- Knutson residences and Robertson Sfudent Center was completed to house all residential students on campus. In 1982, the Totino Fine Arts Center was completed. In 1992, the campus library was moved into the new Berntsen Resource Center. In 1996, the Ericksen Center was completed. Today, the Northwestern College campus retains its rural charm within the context of its core educational mission. It has a sense of community because most of the student population is located on or near the campus. The College's natural environment (Figure No.1) is largely a function of its two lakes, Johanna and Litlle Johanna, which occupy a large part of the total land area of the campus. Lakes Johanna and Little Johanna generally fall into two Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) categories; Natural Environmental and Recreational. Northwestern College Master Plan Stormwater Management Study 2 13529.000 r :~ I I: F i i i ~ ~ " I g ~ <> " ~ z ~ ~ w g ~ " w 0 , ~ I . I I f 'if /~ / ///\ / /' ---- ---- . ."'. ~. /~.'(~ - /{-,: ~ ~ --- ~ (",d;T-~ ""--. ! ~~. '^ _-A \~~ )~ f /- i/ / / ._---~ -' ._~ ~ -----/;:; -----1/ / -1--/ ; i----/ /; ; t- 'r - --I t-- ! ,"L- -1, ! ~--r--; .1 ' . 8' J::..--J....J.~.J g , , ~ u. ~ ~~ II: ~~ ~~ ':l;Cl (}~ w ~ g z I ~ <> o "' +- ~ ! N ~, O_~ <----.,.-.- III. HYDROLOGIC AND RESOURCE INVENTORY The campus soil conditions are described as sandy lake sediment in the Geologic Atlas for Ramsey County, which was prepared by the Minnesota Geological Survey in 1992. This would include fine-to-medium sand and silt and clay. These are probably former lake deposits that may have been partially confined by stagnant ice. The campus forms a peninsula on northerly and westerly sides into Lake Johanna in Arden Hills and on its westerly side into Little Lake Johanna in Roseville. Figure No.1 shows the existing campus watersheds. Lake Johanna (DNR Lake 10 number 62-0078 and hydrologic unit code 7010206) is located in Arden Hills and has an area of 213 acres and maximum depth of 43 feet. Its dominant bottom substrate is sand and gravel, and muck with abundant plant growth to a maximum depth of 10 feet. Bluegills are the most abundant species sampled in Lake Johanna. The average length captured during the survey was 5.53 inches. Less than 1 % of the catch exceeded 7 inches. Pumpkinseed and hybrid sunfish were also sampled in high abundance for this type of lake. Black crappies were not as abundant as previous years. The population of this species has been variable. The average length sampled was slightly larger than 7 inches. Walleye were sampled in average numbers for this type of lake. Half the walleyes caught were 20 inches and longer. Northern pike were abundant when compared to historical levels on this lake. The average size caught was 26.62 inches and 4.37 pounds. Over 70% of the pike sampled exceeded 25 inches. Yellow perch were found to be abundant but small. Two thousand six hundred and seventy seven (2,677) Lake level records for Lake Johanna have been record since January 5, 1924, to the present (Figure No.2). The highest and lowest recorded water levels were: 881.27 feet on July 3, 1978, and 870.35 feet on July 21, 1926, respectively, which is a range of 10.92 feet. The most recent lake level reading was 878.51 on June 30, 2006. The MDNR has established an Ordinary High Water (OHW) level of 878 feet which means that any work below that level would require a permit from the MDNR. Northwestern College Master Plan Stormwater Management Study 4 13529.000 879 " 878.25 +> 4- '-' ,;: Co 877.5 .~ +> no :> QJ W 87&.75 87& FIGURE NO.2: LAKE JOHANNA WATER LEVEL READING Johanna - 62007800 \ It ...... ....~... . rl."t ~~"IP\ i\ .fl\r\r~'.)'" II Ii \ I ) \ I I \ III Ii i1 ' rill!'. i I II \'; " ~,' r \~ I, d fl.1 t J~ I \ I '''I ,,I 1998 2~~~ 2~~1 2~~2 2~N The Lake is classified as Eutrophic based on transparency, Chlorophyll, and Total Phosphorus measurements as presented in Figure NO.3. Trophic Stat'=! 111da: lnunpanwtry (m) C'hlOl"Dphyll-a (ppb) T.taI Phosphm-us (ppb) Northwestern College Master Plan Stormwater Management Study FIGURE NO.3: LAKE JOHANNA WATER QUALITY DATA ~.hupl"" MC5'lrq>hk Eu..upl.... Hypm.....up~ 5 13529.000 Little Lake Johanna (DNR Lake ID number 62-0078 and hydrologic unit code 7010206) is located in Roseville and Arden Hills. This lake has an area of 18 acres and maximum depth of 28 feet. The dominate bottom substrate is not known nor is the abundance of aquatic plants or water quality. Based on the Gillnet catch only, Carp, Black Bullhead. and Black Crappies were found at above local median. Brown Bullhead and Northern Pike were sampled at below local median levels. Yellow Bullhead, Largemouth Bass, Green Sunfish, Pumpkinseed, Bluegill and hybrid Sunfish are know to inhabit the lake based on 1979 test netting. The oniy recorded water level on Little Lake Johanna is 878.28 feet on August 5, 1976. IV. PROBLEM ASSESSMENT Current data suggests that Lakes Little Johanna and Johanna have water quality issues. Both are included in the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's (MPCAs) March 31, 2004, proposed Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) list. The listing for Little Lake Johanna was due to a stress caused by excess nutrients affecting its use for aquatic recreation. The listing for Lake Johanna was for impacts due to mercury affecting its use for fish consumption. The Lake Johanna listing is a mainly regional expression, so the initial approach will be to complete regional or state-wide mercury TMDL reports. This approach could change based on basin planning activities. U.S. EPA Region 5 understands there must be a federal responsibility for the national and international air-borne components of mercury. Both lakes are also included on the MPCA 2006 Impaired Waters List. This Suriace Water Management Plan (SWMP) presents a vision of high quality natural and water resources for the College as its Master Plan (Figure No.4) is implemented. The SWMP's overall goal is to cooperate with the Cities of Roseville and Arden Hills to improve the quality of both of the campus lakes. Achievement of these goals will deliver good quality stormwater runoff from the campus to lakes and wetlands at acceptable rates and volumes, while reducing pollutant and sediment loadings and stream bed/stream bank erosion and water quality degradation. The success of attaining these goals will be measured by: A. Improving the lake grades for Johanna and Little Johanna in cooperation with the RCWD and the Cities of Roseville and Arden Hills. Northwestern College Master Plan Stormwater Management Study 6 13529.000 B, Maintaining the existing runoff characteristics of peak flow and volume from the campus's sub watersheds in accordance with rules promulgated by NPDES, the Cities of Arden Hills and Roseville, and the Rice Creek Watershed District. C. Effective implementation of the College's policies with regard to BMPs and the NPDES measurable goals in the areas of Public Education and Outreach, Public Participation/Involvement, Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination, Construction Site Runoff Control, Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping and Post Construction Runoff Control. There follows Figure 4 which shows proposed improvements that are the subject of this PUD as it was begun. Since the process began, a number of changes and refinements have occurred. There follows Exhibit B as taken from the PUD Report dated August, 2007, entitled "Anticipated General Site Development and Phasing Plan." This plan represents the most current version of the Campus Plan. Key changes in this plan include: A. Realignment of the road in the northeastern corner of the campus. B. Design of the parking ramp with access to other parking and two-way streets to allow egress from the parking ramp to Lincoln Drive. C. Deletion of the maintenance facilitv/parkinq ramp on the northwest corner of the plan. D. Movement of the proposed dormitory from the east side of the Campus to a more central location. E. Movement of the field house to the southwest side of the campus and realiqnment of the Athletic fields. Northwestern College Master Plan Slormwater Management Study 7 13529.000 fr<Jm6!:i '!""<''l <;~""f>Hld"'!{W5<1,J ~ ,......, "')"i,-<,'.,(;;!,; ";)''';):>F-'wr\l\f'J<>>l~'f, ['8 ;;,. '"'~""" ,+ (1)"" '-i;)~'.;;V .", -:,..-<,- "iV,'/ "(""';.;J",-,/,-, ".,;,'., ,'"" ,,~n<)'ll'j"f:l h'<'N ffi '''(e' f..'N1WJc.>C mi'1N ~ m ",.HI,,!:lS;ii"! o'lj,~9}'tlh"pe)t' W I- ii) iji L:.J liO!l!?!'VhnHi!) lJ3 ,,^,, ,,',",(-;' ,,'J ~',.-, ~ \ill ii/ ""-./ "~!\!;;I';~ {~';;~{~~ fill G3S0dOl:ld ,t;,;OOJS~I'D! S;:i)wo i UO;l('J1SjUjWP"t' ;'P::I,,^')eU'0,,\:!/SID!OlUOmpp'i P,1)1.H'CUUl'0qcljS-f.:IJ'pi!na"mHiJ {Lei U1~OO 6U!1Spf3 ~S!lOW3a m rapOllHlj":'SoorfLl "5nolj~"I>~Od Ell 5!i~lSDOL - is OOC'll i>t.,)ClU,O)LllltoSi: 6ulPuna UO!lIl~\S!U!WPV m SP"liOS (ju'!ii>US9D6{ ^JO\!W~oQ 1m ,,;;89Q t>ulllalJ5Dlt"76l J\~OlIWJOO m Sp.l1:lIS 61JIliauSOS6l ^JO;!I.WOO ED i5SW'i:v (SU)-!) J,t\u,Q 111pilW U05UljOr I"W III sp;ag ~L SWJOO ")l1n"141nos m SP'>SOS9 ll!\JI!H f uosmu); I] ;:lS:J1'5B'S, J"~U<I)U<lS"lt)IJ3 m ~P;;fl %' "'JO;!W~Oa J<lAQW n P;},\QW;;) s~mo)s!UU".lm ~sv 006'(1 ppE ,u.{:J~:};aG - ;lS9S69'6V III!Hj;~I!H D :lS9..all"Bl AJuqn UaSlUJ<l8 a ~S9SlL't9 Hl;U;;o)S;lV;;oU!:lOU!IQID is'JOSL'tm IlI!H4)<lJI!;ZIlN B "JJnOSa~ll!mleN-flade4)pUeISlD !>NI.LSIX3 ., .\lJ;xiOJd)MN i!Il EiU!lll~dP~odoJd II ,/:'U!Pi!rlll.!<'plewwo) II SU""J9~'U St!0l1dO"lqF5~od II SllO!lfMlll"ij II ~p~ol:l pa~odoJd III uOInnJl<;uO)p<>sodoJci i!i! 6\J!~'f--di\Pro1l6\J!151"~ 11II sBUlpl!na!3U!:U!"3 II ON3931 a --I I I i I I I I I , 3dO::>S N'lfld l:I31S'lf1l\l Sndll\l'lf) 393110) NH31S3MH1HON i '--" \ f' I l \ \ _J i-- I i i I i i , I I -4 V. REGULATIONS This Plan recognizes the numerous entities involved in water resources management and environmental protection. It avoids duplicating eftorts of others by assuring continuity between Northwestern College and the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD), Ramsey County, the Metropolitan Council (METCO), State of Minnesota Agencies such as the Department of Natural Resources (MDNR), the Department of Health (MDH) and the Board of Soil and Water Resources (BWSR), plus Federal Agencies, most notably the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Within this context, this Plan meets the provisions of the Federal Clean Water Act and Minnesota Statutes 473, 879, and 103B.235, It also conforms to Minnesota Rules 8410 and RCWD Rules. The State of Minnesota adopted the Minnesota Watershed District Act in 1955. This Act, now codified in Minnesota Statues 103D (formerly Chapter 112), provides for establishment of watershed districts "to conserve the natural resources of the state by land use planning, flood control, and other conservation projects using sound scientific principles for the protection of the public health and welfare and provident use of the natural resources." The RCWD is a special purpose unit of local government created to carry out watershed management. The Minnesota Water Resources Board (MWRB) established the District in 1972, under the authority of Minnesota Statutes 103D. The original RCWD plan for water management was prepared in 1974. A 'second generation" plan was completed in 1990, in compliance with the Metropolitan Surface Water Management Act (Minnesota Statutes 103B). That plan has been updated in 1994, 1997, and 2000. The RCWD mission statement is "Prevent flooding and enhance water quality in harmony with development for the common good". The District's objectives include: (A) Minimize public expenditure to control runoff, (B) Improve water quality, (C) Prevent flooding and erosion, (D) Promote groundwater recharge, (E) Protect and enhance fish and wildlife habitat and recreation and (F) Provide for the transition of water management to local units of government. A. CURRENT RCWD STORMWATER RULES The current RCWD permit rules that are relevant to the campus are discussed below and full text is included in the Appendix. Northwestern College Master Plan Stormwater Management Study 9 13529.000 1. Detention basins must be designed to provide an outlet structure to control the 1-year or 2-year, and 100-year frequency events to pre-project peak runoff sites. An emergency overllow spillway must be identified that provides for the safe conveyance of larger flows. 2. Permanent sedimentation and water quality ponds are required and must be designed to provide water quality features consistent with the National Urban Runoff Program (NURP criteria) and District wel pond criteria. This includes: a) A permanent wet pool with dead storage of at least equal to the runoff from a 2.5 rainfall over the area tributary to the pond, b) An outlet structure capable of preventing migration of floating debris and oils for at least the one-year storm; and, c) Access for future maintenance. 3. All new residential, commercial, industrial and other habitable or non-habitable structures must be constructed so that the lowest floor elevations are a minimum of two feet above the critical event 100-year high water elevation and are one. foot above the overllow elevation of nearby waterbodies. 4. Development resulting in the creation of impervious surlaces must explicitly address the use of Best Management Practices (BMPs) to: a) Limit the loss of pervious area; and, b) Infiltrate runoff which does occur from impervious areas to the extent feasible. 5. Incorporate practices into the design which are capable of infiltrating the impervious surlace runoff from the Minneapolis-St. Paul median storm (0.34 inches) in 72 hours. B. PROPOSED RCWD STORMWATER RULES RCWD is proposing new rules that would modify the existing rules discussed above. These proposed rules would apply to three types of project types: Northwestern College Master Plan Stormwater Management Study 10 13529.000 1. New development projects 2. Redevelopment projects 3, Linear Projects such streets, utility and independent trail projects In its new rules, RCWD wants to employ BMPs based on the runoff volume generated (under proposed conditions) from the 2-year (2,8 inch storm evenl) that "mimics the natural hydrology of a watershed". This would be the standard for "new development" projects. RCWD wants another very important change in the recognized "existing condition" baseline of the watersheds for "redevelopment projects". They want to eliminate this baseline and replace it with a "pre.development baseline", A "minimum standard" for a "redevelopment project" would be treatment at 70% of the "new developmenf' treatment goals for the entire watershed. For street projects, the RCWD currently requires that runoff from rainfalls of 0.34 inches or less be captured and infiltrated, RCWD intends to keep this standard for "greater than 1 acre new impervious" projects along with rate control for the 1-year and 1 OO-year storm events. C. RCWD WETLAND RULES The Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) of 1991 requires the mitigation of wetland impacts. It gives the RCWD administrative and enforcement powers over wetlands located in Northwestern College. RCWD has been authorized by the Minnesota State Legislature to act as the local government unit responsible for administering the Wetland Conservation Act. RCWD does not have a local wetland-banking program and relies on the state program for mitigation purposes. It uses methods and procedures outlined in the WCA to determine replacement of wetland values in mitigation proposals. Northwestern College Master Plan Stormwater Management Study 11 13529.000 D. COUNTY RULES Ramsey County (Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) has developed a Ground Water Quality Protection Plan that provides guidance for preventing groundwater contamination for local governments, dated May 1996. E, STATE RULES The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) has authority over the state's protected waters, which includes Johanna and Little Johanna because they have areas greater than 2.5 acres in both Roseville and Arden Hills, which are incorporated areas of the state. This authority is implemented by permitting which includes aquatic plant control, lake levels, streambank modifications and shoreland management (which MDNR delegated to the Cities of Roseville and Arden Hills). F. MUNICIPAL RULES The Cities of Arden Hills and Roseville are also very interested and involved with Northwestern College. While the City of Arden Hills defers to the RCWD standards for developments with respect to stormwater management, the City of Roseville has standards with respect to stormwater management including: 1. Not exceeding 25% impervious cover of a site area in a shoreland or wetland overlay district unless stormwater is conveyed to an approved on.site or regional stormwater ponding /retention facility prior to discharge. 2, Review for compliance with the City Stormwater Plan, NURP standards, MPCA Urban BMPs and other agency concerns 3. All Commercial, Industrial and Residential Developments greater than five acres will: a) Remove a minimum of ninety percent of total suspended solids resulting from the runoft from a one inch rainfall event; and, Northwestern College Master Plan Stormwater Management Study 12 13529.000 b) Provide for settling chambers, sumps, dry ponds or other devices to provide filtering and settling of fine sands prior to discharge to city stormwater systems. 4. All private stormwater systems shall be maintained to operate as originally designed, VI. CONCEPTUAL PLAN FOR SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT The Northwestern Campus is divided into two distinct areas which can viewed as the Arden Hills development jurisdiction area (north half of the Campus) and Roseville development jurisdiction area (South half of the Campus). As discussed above, both halves of the Campus will require RCWD and NPDES permits for development permits and the southern half of the Campus will also need to comply with the City of Roseville rules. Within this contex1, the College will also need to be mindful of the fact that all of these rules are evolving from using existing conditions as the base watershed condition to a pre-settlement condition as the base watershed condition. Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) (Figures 5 and 6 and Table 1) that seem particularly appropriate for the Campus include: A. WET DETENTION PONDS This is the classic Stormwater Treatment BMP, commonly referred to as the "Walker Pond" in Minnesota. Such a pond captures and retains runoff during storm events which controls both stormwater quantity and quality, The pond's natural physical, biological, and chemical processes then work to remove pollutants. Sedimentation processes remove particulates and organic matter, while dissolved nutrients are removed through biological uptake. Several such ponds currently exist on Campus near the Totino Fine Arts Center in the North (Arden Hills) area of the Campus and near the Erickson Center and the Hartill-Knutson Residences and Robertson Student Center. Northwestern College Master Plan Storm water Management Study 13 13529.000 B. POLLUTION PREVENTION This includes construction sediment control, material storage control, turl management, parking lot cleaning and street sweeping, litter control, deicing management, vehicle maintenance, storm sewer maintenance, and malerial storage covers. C. PERVIOUS PAVEMENTS Pervious pavements reduce the amount of runoff by allowing water to pass through surlaces that would otherwise be impervious. This can be accomplished by using products such as "Netlawn" to reinforce turl areas so they are suitable for some parking practices. Other pervious pavements include porous pavers or pervious asphalt. D. INFILTRATION RCWD strongly encourages using Infiltration as a BMP. Due to its sandy soils, the Campus is well suited for the use of this BMP. Using such practices would also be particularly useful in meeting the City of Roseville's requirement to capture the runoff from a one inch rainfall for water quality control. The Campus has implemented this BMP in one parking area on its northeast side as shown in Figure 5. Potential infiltration practices include rain gardens, depressed parking lot islands, swales, sand filters, infiltration basins or trenches, and underground systems. E. FILTERS AND SUMPS Filters and sumps could also be employed in catch basins to add to the ability to capture pollutions contained in runoff. This BMP could be employed in any catch basin on the Campus and would be most effective in treating catch basin flows that are not treated by other BMPs. Northwestern College Master Plan Stormwater Management Study 14 13529.000 Table NO.1 BMP Selection by Watershed ~ Q. E , 'D C .':1 ~ ~ c ~ c ~ 0 ~ .g ~ "- c E ~ 0 c > ~ ~ u: 0 ~ > Ii. c " Ii. ~ c Q. c ';; ~ c .. ,9 ~ ;; 0 , ~ m Area 0 " 0 '" ~ .2 .~ E Watershed (acres) Prooosed Structures ~ '0 w 10 ~ ;:: "- Q. 0 1 3.5 X X X X X 2 5.7 Camous Green/Communitv Life Center/Road X X X X 3 4.6 Music Addr /Science Blda/Road X X 4 3.4 Communitv Life Center/Road X X X 5 2.1 X X X 6 2.7 Parkino Ramo X X 7 6.4 Parkina Ramp/Dormitorv X X X ---" 8 3.9 Road X X X -- . 9 2.1 X X -- 10 9.7 Field House X X X - 11 5.1 Field House X X 12 0.3 Alumni Center X There follows additions (Figure 5a and Exhibit D) that show revised BMPS Maps based on changes in the campus master plan discussed earlier in this report. The main difterence is in reconfiguring subwatersheds to account for refinements and changes in the Comprehensive Plan. Northwestern College Master Plan Stormwater Management Study 15 13529.000 i '" w I ~ j i-,~ III ", I x,l ~~- ~~~~t Ii 11m 1 ~1lii! "'- I111 ! <: Ww2: o::!~~ i-<..,.. :J-l6 ~ 'Za. .~~ U~ :" ~61~ .~~~ '" :::;Q {51t \ I x \ ~ \ l!~~ !~ ~~[ ;~tz I dl lf~ x i ill ~ ~ w ~ I ~ i~ t ~~m ~O([ <: _2: ~~ L0 'L S I ~ ~"" ! ~ d I, ~ nill: o >- 8 t"; 2~ @: ~ ff ~E f I ~ ~ ~ ~ fiE ~ t.> _ 'I w :is ;:; '^' . ~ I :: (0/ nil I o o I " I +1 ' N . . ~i ~ o ~ g 0;>;,,-; i ![ i I ~--J ! ! i i ij~ I uu__i"-::' I -'- -:----- _Iii ~ I ill I ~~~ Iliil. 2~~ iil 0 i 0 ~ I i i -!-.~ i I ~ , 8 ',y~cl m .}J ~ ! I ~ ' I Z ! i ! il! ii'~ ~~- ~~i~t I I~~!@ ~ il!'~l!! I ;!2<31f l' ~w \'1 ;~~ r*" ...I ~ * Iii 1 i .Js- 1 ~~~~I~ 2"i~Q'\ ~~!@ 5111!! Q..(J~ ~i ~.~ ~ .., wZ xZ ..,'" ....JI o ~ o o '" , g U o ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ (< CI'.... Iii ,c ~i is .1:j t z o 0 ~ . ~ g 81< 8 f~ ~ ~g~ i?~ i liH " "^~;; t +1 N o '" I nn . ~I . ~. o .. :' , , ~ ",,0/; Ii '" r ~ g ~ g :.: !i >- 8 ~ g ~ g g o <. - 0'. ~.< :; s '_ ~ g!l ~ i:'~~5~ H ~ *,,"Q~ '" 8~ '" 1t~r;!Hi &g ~ ;;: ~ 0'" C r~'/ ;~~; i~ 0. i l~~ I ,;i~i ~P.l~ ii2fh .O~ I '; y I 0,( 'l if , ~ i ~ I 8 i ! I ~ r<i~~ i~<o i~~[ ,j Ilh i~~s i _It li~i -'s In \ z <i! ~gm ~<3iE -< :JL..;Z I-:::,cZ t::;~;2 "'--Q I ~~ I ~I n~ ~A ~ o o '" ""* t: N o '" ~~~ 01 ~-~ w......_ ~- I . 11111 i: :l t;i ~, !;; €' ~ Q; W IO~ Ih I~~!J , < 0 8~ ~ '" " ~g~ ;;: Qe ; ~~b~ : 8~~" ~ .!€ "'''' ~ ~& ~~ 2 <J g ~g ~ i ~ u I ~ ,i~i I~~ ; I!!~~ ' i ~~f \ ! ii ! ~~~ ; I!!,.,I!! ~('lil' ~d ;f ::::t;z t:;s1 - 0 -, 'I Ii o ~-y- ~ 0' 0' l'0[ I ; ~I -I I """,,,,__\~~ 0 I .....,':J'.:-:....~ -- I~~ ~~f N VII. GOALS AND POLICIES This Plan also supports the establishment of policies for water resource management which are realistic, attainable and economically feasible, as follows: Goal: Use the natural characteristics of the Campus watersheds in combination with development standards and projects, to reduce present and future flood damages and enhance the quality of surface and ground water. A. WATER QUANTITY Policy: Establish standards for storm water runoff quantity and quality for Campus development consistent with RWCD, City of Roseville and NPDES Phase II requirements. Policy Implement and enforce a program to detect and eliminate illicit discharges as defined in 40 CFR 122.26(b) (2). 8, WATER QUALITY Goal: Protect and improve water quality and the scenic and ecologic values of Campus lakes. The College seeks to maintain and improve the water quality of its lakes using nutrient loading as the yardstick for success. Policy: Preserve and improve the recreational resources associated with water issue. Policy: In cooperation with RCWD adopt standards for stormwater runoff quality from new and re-developments. C. NATURAL RESOURCES Goal: Prioritize the important natural resources of the Campus and preserve key components and characteristics of the terrestrial and aquatic communities necessary for basic ecosystem function. Policy: Maintain a diversity of plant and animal species. Northwestern College Master Plan Stormwater Management Study 20 13529,000 Policy: Assess and monitor colonization and continued distribution of harmful species within Campus lakes and wetlands. Policy: Maintain riparian buffers along the lakes bordering the Campus. D. WETLANDS Goal: Protection of Campus wetlands in accordance with current Rules and Regulations. Policy: Leadership in the management of wetland resources by coordination with the RCWD. E. EROSION CONTROL Goal: Develop proper mitigation measures to allow disturbed environments to recover as quickly as possible. Policy: Establish erosion control practices for construction projects. F. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION, INFORMATION AND EDUCATION Goal: Enhancement of cooperation and sharing of information between various levels of government to enhance efficiency and reduce the likelihood of duplication. Policy Maintain effective and efficient programs and efforts through effective communication and coordination with local, state and federal agencies. G. MONITORING Goal: Develop data needed to assess baseline watershed conditions to deal with development and provide a technical basis for College projects. Policy: Participate in a Campus wide resource monitoring plan in cooperation with other governmental agencies such as RCWD and the Cities of Arden Hills and Roseville. Policy: Assist in the Implementation of the resource data monitoring plan. Northwestern College Master Plan Stormwater Management Study 21 13529.000 H. MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION Goal: Protect Campus stormwater infrastructure. Policy: Develop and implement a plan for the regular inspection and maintenance of water resource infrastructure. Policy Develop and implement a training program to prevent or reduce pollutant runoff resulting from Campus operations. Policy Reporting consistent with NPDES Phase II I. FINANCE Goal: Establish funding mechanisms for plan implementation. Policy: Identify funding sources to support implementation of the Plan. VIII. IMPLEMENTATION Implementation of the Campus Stormwater BMPs will require the development of a Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) once the proposed projects are sufficiently refined. In some respects, the implementation of the CIP will include elements of a Storm water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that the NPDES program requires of many Cities including Roseville and Arden Hills. Such a plan has six elements: A. PUBLIC EDUCATION AND OUTREACH Distributing educational materials and perlorming outreach to inform citizens about the impacts polluted stormwater runoff discharges can have on water quality. This could include website links and distribution of education materials. B. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION/INVOLVEMENT Provide opportunities for citizens to participate in program development and implementation. This could include publicizing public hearings and/or encouraging participation on a stormwater management panels. Northwestern College Master Plan Stormwater Management Study 22 13529.000 Developing and implementing a plan to detect and eliminate illicit discharges to the storm sewer system. C. ILLICIT DISCHARGE DETECTION AND ELIMINATION D. CONSTRUCTION SITE RUNOFF CONTROL Developing, implementing, and enforcing an erosion and sediment control program for construction activities. This control measure typically includes silt fences and temporary stormwater detention ponds. E. POST-CONSTRUCTION RUNOFF CONTROL Developing, implementing, and enforcing a program to address discharges of post- construction stormwater runoff from new development and redevelopment areas. Applicable controls would include implementing the BMPs discussed previously in this Plan. F, POLLUTION PREVENTION/GOOD HOUSEKEEPING Developing and implementing a program with the goal of preventing or reducing pollutant runoff from site operations. This control measure typically includes street and parking lot sweeping twice a year. In the near term, the College can include some elements of the BMPs presented here into imminent projects such as landscaping. A good place to start implementing such BMPs would be in conjunction with the College's ongoing program to control invasive species. Longer term, the BMPs that have been identified in this Plan should be incorporated into all development and redevelopment projects. The development of a Stormwater Capital Improvement Program would also be useful in identifying costs and funding sources for the implementation of the BMPs. Northwestern College Master Plan Stormwater Management Study 23 13529.000 APPENDIX Wetland Delineations City of Roseville Regulations Rice Creek Watershed District Regulations NPDES Construction Regulations Best Management Practices ~.:"'~ 'll'. :\ J.A ''If l,v ti B " . , " , , , a . , . . I , , , u ! ~--- :/:4cr-"l I . 1- 't>, A,( /~,., g"j'"'I''' Ck-,I IK.i\lvS"(, I - ~ILbIiJ(.-, '/..... \ . c:-~~.. l.~LI~1 !" ~~ /i', '\ .JY-b "'d ,.. >< ,,61 "fl',' I /1. 'Tj;f~\;::~" "/cJ5~::-~ i1 ) I v'~' c.._/ --' . j";) T'-" ,y'i,,/J' (, c;--~ Vi.:S--: .5-- ('f- V'.10k.JiJ c: -...J C...:....-..-.---'II\.,'\.,(-7 r" t-\l5'- (, . C.:l '~'-" t .--" U. " '" ;-..J~ ", ~,,,' 1"'<';:2 ''^'. , .._ '" (,J:;'- 4 '.N--"'.iO \";/ \..r=:is....::.\ ,r' 1/ rJZ'V~'...;f:Cj i C-i ,-)C' L' {)--- \;JS0- 2. fY . ()--'!.--vi:c6.;..~<" I' '\,,-. -' ~ '. (:'/.:.;6-4 L.~,5t:)-S~ ~ L J€ TUltvD 5!3 LJ't-~ ---~I \; """ / ~:-5- " A. tU() 0 J~ ",l.'L if ^ I' - ',' ,. ',; I '\l~ . J 1 !v <~ I 4 ,- ..JLf'1 f-C !,-,:Ji7;-'_.f ~~iN\.:) j:'IL.;( i ,', '\ " I _12 I __ ,/i ',!" Od/ . .'. / ~ -lrt- Jih--< -::- __'-:'7' " '>-- /( ')l,- (.,J 0-'-'- t) 2. - <.., <? ~ ... \ , 7', .\. , V/ "'" "ff} \ / /- :,\.\j" / '\fli\~ Ii'< . l-fL. f ? ~ U2.'-J5">" r /.. / t/2.. L 0---- lv 'I_ .2. (.Ii- f --;) I' n \", -3 iJJ'f-~ "' 'I (/ji - ( ., -0 l;Ji - .~,. --\2 !/ lJ3-<; tbWc: / t-J5-:s \ J "'-.., ".--'~ 3- S' !;~.E.r(,r\f,Ji) 3 t.n~2 ------D 1 ["! 1-1,_ L' j\" , \ ~,' ,r-i'J;2(~~' .J_"" l \ '\',... 1,)..,) < ..;;ty\L..) \ . .._ lA' 6-""1 TJi-Y __' VJ:3-/ " r 1;&V\i:;(C"" , ! 1/,]; - (, , , , --fJ VJ~7Lf.\ /'v'j) J S-LJiL I. I , I --fi7..:\,I:,Sr:- ("i ! . . I' . ( __~'J--__ [/\ l" [ F\l e;q:";7~f\;(-, ',~)j-I elf',l...t.:, 1. , ", ., us. t~.'-.,/ SECTION: ] 0] 6.01: ]016.02: ]0]6.03: 10]6.04: ]0]6.05: 1016.06: 10]6.07: 1016.08: 1016.09: ]016.10: 1016.11: 1016.12 JOJ6.13; 10]6.14: 1016.15: 1016,16: 1016.J7: 1016.J8: 1016.19: 1016.20: ]016.21: ]016.22: 1016.23: 1016.24: 10 16.25: 1016.26: 1016.27: ilAPTlm lOi6 SIIOHELANO, \\ETI AND!\ D STem w, '\, \f;E:\lF" Short Title Jurisdiction Statutory Authorization Policy; Statement of Purpose Delinitions Enforcement Compliance Disclaimer Interpretation Severability Abrogation and Greater Restrictions Administration Water Management Overlay Districts Shore land Classifications Water Management Overlay District Lot Standards Additional Lot Dimension Requirements Structure Design Standards General Design Criteria for Structures Design Criteria for Commercial, Industrial, Public and Semi-Public Uses Notifications to the Department of Natura] Resources Variances Conditional Uses Nonconfonnities Subdivision/Platting Provisions Planned Unit Development Requirements Grading, Filling and Land Alteration Storm Water Management Amendment 1016.01: SHORT TITLE: The name of this Chapter shall bc THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE SHORELAND, WETLANfJ, AND STORM WATER MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE (Ord. 1156, ]2-]2.94) 10]6.02: JURISDICTION: The provisions of this Chapter shall appty to the share land, wetland and storm water management overlay dist,icts and the City in general as each section specifies. (Ord. ] ]56,12-12.94) City of RoseviIJe - Water Management Overlay Districts CJ Walershcd Boond.1ncs _ Ot), ~igrot<:d Shordand [~ DNR l)csign3lcd Shon:l:md _. . Pllblic W:!lcrYWctlurllh NDI$'lfl(1l'\o\IOJari1.'S J I'Yl'~'.., ~ II ;1 ~SI3VH:itB ., )00(1 2000 f<<1 ....,- --,...--.., D"''lC'la",,~dcr-h 'l~; I ~<' [." l.'''-R a l'l'\ ~:"wi"",; 'r~Ij'....,., i;-"PlJnt"\bh";A. \,,"',}...L {[[p'lH,,,,,dir l .>'1,,,,,",'1. [k-,.;.')'"...",I Pq"';I.mw~ M~, n.I9'l~ 1016.03: STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION: This Shoretand, Wetland and Storm Waler Management Chapter is adopted pursuant to the authorization and policies contained in Minnesota Statutes chapters 1mB, 105,462 and 497; Minnesota Rules, parts 6120.2500 through 6120.3900; Minnesota Rules chapters 84tO and 8420. (Ord. I t56, 12-12-94) 1016.04: POLICY; STATEMENT OF PURPOSE: A. Waters and Wetland Policy: 1. The City's Comprehensive Land Use Plan identifies specific goals and poficies related to the proper management of its shoreland, lakes, wetlands. water and soil resourees. 2. The City recognizes that the uncontrolled use of shore lands, wetlands, and land alteration activities in general in the City affects the public health, safety and general welfare not only by contributing to the pollution of surface and ground waters, but also by impairing the local tax base. 3. Land development and use impact all receiving waters, especially lakes, by contributing to their impairment through point and nonpoint pollution sources. 4. The City has adopted a Surface Water Management Plan that recognizes that its stom1 water system is integrated with the management of its naturat lakes and wetlands. 5. Therefore, the City has determined that it is in the best interests of the public to manage its Comprehensive Plan and Surface Water Management Plan by a consolidated approach with this Chapter to avoid conflict and duplication 10 the maximum practical extent. B. Statement of Purpose: to achieve the policies described in the City Comprehensive Plan, State and Federal policies and statutes, the City intends to determine, control and guide future development within and surrounding those land areas which are contiguous to designated bodies of public water and areas of "natural environmental significance" as herein defined and regulated. Specifically, this Chapter purports to: I. Regulate the placement of sanitary and storm water disposal facilities on lots; 2. Regulate the area ofa lot and the length of water frontage suitable for a building site; 3. Regulate alteration of the shorelands and wetlands of public waters; 4. Control natural environment areas of ecological value to maintain existing aquatic, vegetation and wildlife conditions to the maximum extent possibfe; 5. Regulate the use and subdivision off and within the corporate limits as it relates to public waters, shorelands and storm water; 6. Providc variances from the minimum standards and criteria. (Ord, 1156, 12-12-94) 1016.05: DEFINITIONS: Unless specifically defined below, words or phrases used in this Chapter shall be interpreted so as to give them the same meaning as they have in common usage and to give this Chapter its most reasonable application. For the purpose of this Chapter, the words "must" and "shall" are mandatory and not pemlissive. All distances, unless otherwise specified, shall be measured horizontally. As used in this Chapter, the following words and terms shall have the meanings ascribed 10 them in this Section: ACCESSORY STRUCTURE OR FACfLlTY: Any building or improvement subordinate to a principaf use which, because of the nature of its use, can reasonably be located at or greater than normal structure setbacks (such as a detached garage). BLUFF: A topographic feature such as a hill, cliff. or embankment having the following characteristics (an area with an average slope of tess than 18 percent over a distance for 50 feet or more shall not be considered part of the bluff): A. Part or all of the feature is located in a shoreland area; B. The sfope rises at least twenty five feet (25') above the ordinary high watcr levcl of the waterbody; C. The grade of the slope from the toe of the bluff 10 a point twenty five feet (25') or more above the ordinary high watcr levcl averages thirty percent (30%) or greater; and D. The slope must drain toward the waterbody. BLUFF IMP ACT ZONE: A bluff, and, only in shoreland districts, land located thirty feet (30') landward from thc top of a bluff. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND APPEAL: The Roseville City Council and Mayor. BOATHOUSE: A structure designed and used solely for the storage of water crafts, boats, boating or water craft equipment. BUILDfNG LINE: A line parallel to a lot line or the ordinary high water level at the required sctback beyond which a structure may not extend. COMMERCIAL PLANNED lINIT DEVELOPMENTS: Commerciaf planned unit devefopments are typically uses that provide transient, short-term lodging spaces, rooms. or parcels and their operations are essentially service-oriented. For example, hotel/motel accommodations, resorts, recreationaf vehicle and camping parks, and othcr primarily service-oriented or office complex activities are commercial planned unit developments. COMMERCIAL USE: The principal use ofland or buildings for the sale, lease, rental, or trade of products, goods, and services. COMMISSIONER: The Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources. CONDITIONAL USE: A "land use" or "development" as defined by City Code that may not be appropriate generally, but may be approved by the City Council with appropriate restrictions as provided by the City Code upon a finding that certain conditions as detailed in the Zoning Ordinance exist, the use or development conforms to the comprehensive land use plan of the community, and the use, through the imposition of conditions, is compatible with the existing neighborhoods. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: A permit specially and individually granted in accordance with this Code, by the City Council after review thereof by the ptanning Commission as a flexibility device to enable the City Council to assign dimensions or conditions to a proposed use, ailer consideration oflhe impacls on or functions of adjacclll and nearby properties and the special problems that the proposed use presents. DECK: A horizontal, unenclosed platform with or without attached railings, seats, trellises, or other ieatmes" attached or functionally related to a principal use or sile and at any point extending more than three feet (3') above ground. DOCK: A seasonat water-oriented accessory structure or walkway extended from the ordinary high water level into the bed of public waters for access to open water and anchorage of water craft. DUPLEX, TRIPLEX AND QUAD: A dwelling structure on a single lot, having two (2), three (3), and four (4) units, respectively, being attached by common walls and each unit equipped with separate sleeping, cooking, eating, living, and sanitation facilities. DWELLING SITE: A designated location for residential use by one or more persons using temporary or movable shelter, including camping and recreational vehicle sites. DWELLING UNIT: Any structure or portion of a structure, or other shelter designed as short- or long-term living quaners for one or more persons, including rental or timeshare accommodations such as hotel, and resort rooms and cabins. EXTRACTIVE USE: The use of land for surface or subsurface removal of sand, gravel, rock, industrial minerals, other nonmetallic minerals, and peat not regulated under Minnesota Statutes, sections 93.44 to 93.51. GAZEBO: A seasonal water-oriented accessory structure used as a detached nonheated shelter. It may have a roof, floor, screen walls, but has no sewer or water service. GUEST COTTAGE: A structure used as a dwelling unit that may contain sleeping spaces and kitchens and bathroom facilities in addition to those provided in the primary dwef!ing unit on a lot. HARDSHIP: The same as that term is defined in Minnesota Statutes chapter 462 (for municipalities). HEIGHT OF BUILDlNG: "Height of building" shall be as defined in the Minnesota State Building.Code, It means the vertical distance between the highest adjoining ground fevel at the building or ten feet (10') above the lowest grouud level, whichever is lower, and the highest point of a flat roof or average height of the highest gabfe of a pitched or hipped roof. INDUSTRIAL USE: The use of land or buildings for the production, manufacture, warehousing, storage, or transfer of goods, products. commodities, or othcr wholesale items. INTENSIVE VEGETATION CLEARING: The complete removal of trees or shmbs in a contiguous patch, strip, row, or block. LIFT: A mechanical device used to lift a boat from the water. LOT: A parcel of land designated by plat, metes and bounds, registered land survey, auditors plot, or other accepted means and separated from other parcels or portions by said description for the purpose of sale, lease, or separation. LOT WlDTH: The shortest distance between lot lines measured at the midpoint of the building line. NONCONFORMING USE: A nonconforming use is any use or arrangement ofland or structures legally existing prior to the enactment of a Code provision prohibiting such use. NONCONFORMING USES: Any use of a building or premises which, on the effective date of this Chapter, does not, even though lawfully established, comply with af! of the applicable use regulations of the zoning district in which such building or premises is located (also see definition of Substandard Use). ORDfNARY HIGH WATER LEVEL: The boundary of public waters and wetlands, and shaf! be an elevation delineating the highest water levet which has been maintained for a sufficient period of time to leave evidence upon the landscape, commonly that point where the natural vegetation changes from predominantly aquatic to predominantly terrestrial. For watercourses, the ordinary high water level is the elevation of the top of the bank of the channel. For reservoirs and flowages, the ordinary high water level is the operating elevation of the uormal summer pooL PATIO: An inground surface of paving or wood materials, not attached to the main stmcture, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD): See chapter lOOS afthis title. PORCH, SCREENED: A seasonal habitable addition to a residentiaf structure, considered part of the stmcture. PUBLIC WATERS: Any "waters" as defined in Minnesota statutes, section t 03G.005, subdivisions 15 and 18. RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: A use where the nature of residency is nontransient and the major or primary focus of the devefopment is not service oriented. For exampfe, residential apartments, manufactured home parks, timeshare condominiums, townhouses, cooperatives, and full fee ownership residences would be considered as residential planned unit developments. To qualify as a residential planned unit development, a development must contain at least five (5) dwelling units or sites. SEMfPUBLlC USE: The use ofland by a private, nonprofit organization to provide a public service that is ordinarily open to some persons outside the regutar constituency of the organization. SENSITIVE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT: The preservation and management of areas unsuitabfc for development in their natural state due to constraints such as shallow soils over ground water or bedrock, highly erosive or expansive soils, steep slopes, susceptibiliry to flooding, or occurrence of f10ra or fauna in need of special protection. SETBACK: The minimum horizontal distance between a structure, sewage treatment system. or other facifity and an ordinary high water fevef, sewage treatment system, top ofa bluff, road, highway, property tine, or other facility. SEWER SYSTEM: The combination of pubfie and private pipelines or conduits, pumping stations, and force main, and all other constmction, devices, appliances, or appurtenances used for conducting sewage or industrial waste or other wastes to a point ofuftimate disposal in a public sewage treatment facility. SHORE IMPACT ZONE: Land located between the ordinary high water level of public water and a fine parallel to it at a setback of fifty percent (50%) of the structure setback. SHORELAND: Land located within one thousand fcct (1,000') from the ordinary high water level of the fakes classified in section 1016.13 of this chapter. The limits of the shorelands may be reduced whenever the waters involved are bounded by topographic divides which extend landward from the waters for lesser distances and when approved by the MnDNR commissioner. SHORELAND MANAGEMENT DISTRICT: Land located within three hundred feet (300') from the ordinary high water level; or the first tier of riparian lots or the first tier of lots or the first tier of lots beyond a public street when the street is adjacent to a public water body, whichever is greater, of certain public waters as established by the Ciry Council as established by this code. SIGNIFICANT HISTORIC SITE: Any archaeological site, standing structure, or other property that meets the criteria for eligibility to the Nationaf Register of Historic Places, is listed in the State Register of Historic Sites, or is determined to be an unplatted cemetery that falls under the provisions of Minnesota statutes, section 307.08. An historic site meets these criteria if it is presently listed on either register or if it is determined to meet the quatifications for listing after review by the Minnesota state archaeologist or the director of the Minnesota Historical Society. All unplatted cemeteries are automatically considered to be significant historic sites. STEEP SLOPE: Land where agricultural activity or development is either not recommended or described as poorly suited due to slope steepness and the site's soil characteristics, as mapped and described in available county soil surveys or other technical reports, unless appropriate design and construction techniques and farming practices are used in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. Where spccific information is not avaifable, steep slopes are lands having average slopes over twelve percent (f 2%), as measured over horizontaf distances of fifty feet (50') or more, that are not bluffs. STORM WATER POND: A manmade pond capable of holding water seasonally or permanently, the purpose of which is to collect runoff, nutrients, and sediment prior to releasing water into wetlands and natural water bodies. STRUCTURE: Any building or appurtenance, including attached or detachcd decks and fences. "Structure" does not include aerial or underground utility lines, such as sewer, electric, telephone, telegraph, gas tines, towers, poles, seasonal docks, and other supporting facilities such as at grade driveways and patios. SUBDIVISION: Land that is divided for the purpose of sale, rent, or lease, including planned unit developments. Blulf height :2:) feeT or more ! To ofBluf! SUBSTANDARD USE: Any use of shore lands existing prior to the date of enactment of any c'ity ordinance which is permitted within the applicable zoning district, but docs not meet the minimum lot area and length of water frontage, stnlcture setbacks, Of other dimensional standards of the Dniimmce. SURFACE WATER ORIENTED COMMERCIAL USE: The use of land for commercial purposes, where access to and use of surface water fcaturc is an integral part of the nonnal conductance of business. Marinas, resorts, and restaurants with transient docking facilities are examples of such use. TOE OF THE BLUFF: The lower point ofa fifty foot (50') segment with an avewge slope e:,ceeding eighteen percent (18%) located in bluff impact zone. See illustration lollowing definition of Top of The Bluff. TOP OF THE BLUFF: The higher point of a lifty foot (50') segment with an average slope exceeding eighteen percent (18%) located in bl\lffimpact zone. See illustration below. < {lUIfSet;i~k Ill. 0 or greater.. \lin ';0 feet ~ '; HiO'h \\iltt'r I.nt'1 VARIANCE: The same as that term is defined or described in Minnesota statutes, chapler 462 (for municipalitics ). WATER ORJENTED ACCESSORY STRUCTURE OR FACILITY: ;\ small. aboveground building or other improvement, (except stairways, fences, docks, and retaining walls), which, because oflhe relationship of its use to a surface water feature, reasonably needs to be located closer to public walers than Ihe normal stmcture setback. Examples of such structures and faci!ities include boathouses, gazebos, screen houses, fish houses, pump houses, and detached decks. WETLAND: A land form that is transitional between "terrestrial" and "agelatlc systcms" as defined in Minnesota statutes, section 103G.005, subdivision 19. WETLAND BOUNDARY: The boundary line between what is considt'red 10 be upland and weiland using the methodology for delinealing wetlands as prescribed in Minnesota statutes, seclion I03G.2242.. subdivision 2. (Ord. 1156,12-12-1994; amd. Ord, 1270,9.23.2002) 1016.06: ENFORCEMENT COMPLIANCE: The use of any shoreland of public waters, the size and shape of lOIS, the use. size. type ami location of stmctures on lots; the installation and maintenance of water supply and waste disposal facilities; the filling, grading, lagooning, or dredging of any shoreland area; the cutting of shore land vegetation and the subdivision of lots shall be in full compliance with the terms ofth;s chapler and other applicable regulations. Construction of buildings, water supply and dry utility service systems and ereclion of signs shall rcquire a pcrmit. unless olherwise expressly excluded by the requirements of this chapter. (Ord. 1156, 12-12-1994) 1016.07: DISCLAIMER: This chapter does not imply that areas outside of the ,horeland, weiland and storm water management overland districl or land uses permitted within that district will be free from flooding or flood damages. This chapter does not create liability on the part of the city or its officers or employees Jor any flood damage that may result from reliance on this chapter or any administrative decisions made under it. (Ord. 1156, 12- ] 2-1994) 1016.08: INTERPRETATION: 1016.09: SEVERABILITY: In their interpretation and application, the provisions of this chapter shall be held to be minimum requirements and shall be liberally constmed in favor of the governing body and shall not be deemed a limitation or repeal of any other powers granted by state statutes. (Ord. 1156. 12-12-1994) ]fany section, clause, provision or portion of this chapter is adjudged unconstitutional or invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this chapter shall not be affected thereby. (Ord. f 156, f 2-f 2- f 994) 1016.10: ABROGATION AND GREATER RESTRICTIONS: It is not intended by this chapter to repeat, abrogate, or impair any existing easements, covenants, or deed restrictions. However, where this chapter imposes greater restrictions, the provisions of this chapter shall prevail. (Ord, Jt 56, ] 2-12- t 994) 1016.11: ADMINISTRATION: A. Enforcement: The community development director is responsible for the overall administration and enforcement of this chapter. Any violation of the provisions of this chapter, the provisions of any permit issued in accordance with this chapter or failure to comply with any of its requirements (ineluding violations of conditions and safeguards established in connection with grants of variances or conditional uses) shall constitute a misdemeanor and shalf be "punishabte" as defined by law or as otherwise provided in this code. B. Permits Required: I. ]n addition to any permit requirements of an underlying district or specific shoreiand or waterfront improvements1 permits are required for the constnlction of retaining walls, driveways, parking lots, patios, fences, water refated accessory structures, watercraft accessory devices and signs within the building setback area from the ordinary high water mark. Apptication for a permit shall be made to the community devefopment director or the director's designee on the fODns provided. The application shall include the necessary information including visual displays, soil, slope and vegetation protection plans so that city staff can determine the site's suitability for the intended use. 2. All permits within this chapter must specify a termination date, not to exceed twelve (12) months from the date of issuance. A permit may be determined to be null and void by the community development director if it is determined after issuance that false supporting information was filed with the permit application. As part of any such determination, the director may issue a stop work order, post1he same on site, send a copy by certified mail to the permittee and determine what other enforcement action is necessary. C. Certificate of Zoning Compliance: The community development director shall issue a certificate of zoning compliance for each activity requiring a permit as specitied in this chapter. This certificate shall specify that the use oflaod conforms to the requirements of this chapter. (Ord. 1156, 12- 12-1994) 1016.12: WATER MANAGEMENT OVERLA Y DISTRICTS: A. Creation: The Water Management Overlay District hereby created and is divided into the following subdistricts as shown on the Official Zoning Map or an attachment thereto: the Shoreland District, the Wetland Protection District, and the Storm Water District. f. Shoreland District: All land meeting the definition of shore land adjacent to the public waters listed in Section 10 16.13 of this Chapter. 2. Wetland Protection District: All upland within one hundred feet (100') of the wetland boundary of wetlands and those public waters not specifically listed as shoreland. 3. Storm Water District: All land either within one hundred feet (100') of the normat water level of constructed storm water ponds or wetlands managed for storm water quantity and quality management purposes, or alf land below the f OO-year !load elevation of such ponds or wetlands. whichever is most restrictive. B. Official Zoning ;\1ap: The amended Official Zoning lV1ap1 \vlth Water ivlanagement Overlay Districts, lS hereby adopted by reference and declared to be a part o!'this Chapter. C. M"intenance of Records: Said OHicial Zoning Map shall be on tile in the ofJiee ofttle Community Development Director. The Communiry Development Director shall maintain the necessary records 10 maintain and display the Official Zoning Map as amended. D. Boundaries: TIle boundaries of the overlay districts as shown on the Official Zoning Map are considered to be approximate and must be established on the ground at the time of any application for pcnnit, variance, conditional use, planned unit development or subdivision of land. E. Allowable Land Uses: The existing zoning on the site shall specif)' the allowable fand uses but atl such uses must additionally comply with any more restrictive standards and criteria of this Chapter. F. Private Sewer Systems Prohibited: Individual on-site sewage treatment systems are prohibited in all Water Management Overlay Districts. (Ort!. 1156, 12-i2-1994) 1(116.13: SHORELAI'/D CLASSIFICATIONS: Tbe following public waters of the City have been classified either consistent with the crileria found in Minnesota Regulations, part 6120.3300, and lhe Prolected Waters Inventory Map for Ramsey County, Minnesota, or classified by the City wben no classification was available from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. The "shorelaud area" for the water bodies fisted in the table below shall be as defined in this Chapter and shown on the Official Zoning Map. "Wetland protection areas" shall be as defined in subseclion 1016.f2A2 oflhis Chapler. "Storm water protection areas" shall be as defined in subsection 1016.12A3 of this Chapter. (Ord. 1156, f2.f2-1994) Shoreland Classification Table , Lake Name MnDNR 1011 Classification MnDNR Desil;nated Shoreland: Lake Joseohine 57P GO Lake Owasso 54P GD ----_..~-------_._----_.~_._--- . _~__."~'_.'M," ,_........~'". _. Little Lake Johamw 58P RD North Bennett 207P GD Citv Desilmate Shorefand'------.. Lan!!ton Lake"" """"" --,- 49P GD Zimmemtan Lake 53W GD Bennett Lake 48W GO ---"~-~-~ . Walsh Lake 214W GD Willow Lake 210W GD Oasis Pond 205W GD .n..._~.___._._ r -- ~~- ~---- .--'-,,---- GD~General Development RD=Reerealignal Development - - --- (Ord. I t56, 12.12-1994; amd. Ord. 1216, 12-14-1998) 1016.14: WATER MANAGEMENT OVERLA Y DISTRICT LOT STANDARDS: A. Additional Standards: The following developmcnt standards are in addition to any standards that apply specitically to the underlying zoning district. \Vhere there is confiict between the underlying and overlying district standards, the most restrictive shall apply. B. Lot Area and Width Standards: The tot area (in square feet) and lot width standmds (in feet) for single and duplex housing on residential lots creatcd after the dale of enactment of this Chapter for the lake classifications arc the following: 1. Shore land Overlay District Lot Slandards: -- ."._.._-=[--.-- Recreation Development Lakes General Development Lakes _'M. " Underlying Zones I Riparian Lots Nonriparian Lots Riparian Lots Nonriparian Lots ... Area' Width' Area" Width' Area' Width' Area*" Width' R-I (Single Family) 15.000 100 11 ,000 85 15,000 100 11,000 85 R-2 (Duplex) 35,000 135 26,000 135 26,000 135 17,500 135 , Area means land above the normal ordinary high water leveL ** All other uses proposed within a shoreland district shall be in the [()fm of fl rezoning to a planned unit development as per Section 1016.24 - 2. Wetland Overlay District Lot Standards: The minimum lot area, width and depth requirements of the underlying land use zoning district within this code shalf appfy provided that not more than twenty five percent (25%) of the lot area may be included in any wetland area to meet the minimum lot area dimension. 3. Storm Water Overlay District Lot Standards: The minimum lot area, width and depth requirements of the underlying land use zoning district within this code shall apply provided that not more than twenty five percent (25%) of the lot area may be included in any storm pond or wetland area (which is below the normaf tevef of the adjacent storm water pond) to meet the minimum lot area dimension. (Ord. 1156, 12-12.1994) 1016.15: ADDITIONAL LOT DIMENSION REQUIREMENTS: A. Dwelling Unit Densities: Residentiaf subdivisions with dwelling unit densities exceeding those in the tables in subsections IOf6.14BI through B3 of this chapter may only be allowed if designed and approved as residential planned unit developments under chapter 1008 of this title. Only land above the ordinary high water fevel of public waters may be used to meet fot area standards. Lot width standards shall be met at both the ordinary high water levef and at the building line, except in a residential planned unit development. Not more than twenty five percent (25%) of the lot area of each lot may be included in any wetland, which is below the normal ordinary high water level. B. Controlled Accesses: Lots intended as controlled accesses to public waters or as recreation areas for use by owners of nonriparian lots within subdivisions shall be allowed only as part of a conditional use permit or planned unit development and shall meet or exceed the following standards: I. They shall be suitable in terms of physical access and potential slope erosion and vegetation damage for the intended uses of controlled access tots; 2. They shall have a specific lot size not less than one hundred seventy feet (170') (two 85-foot wide fots combined); 3. They shall be jointly owned by all purchasers of lots in ti1e subdivision or by all purchasers of nonriparian tots in the subdivision who are provided riparian access rights on the access lot; and 4. Covenants or other equally effective fegal instruments shall be developed that specify which lot owners have authority to use the access lot and what activities are allowed. The activities may include watercraft faunching, loading, storage, beaching, mooring, or docking. They may also include other outdoor recreational activities that do not significantly conflict with general public use of the public water or the enjoyment of normal property rights by adjacent property owners. Examples of the nonsignificant conflict activities include swimming, sunbathing, or picnicking. The covenants shall limit the total number of vehicles allowed to be parked and the totat number of watercraft allowed to be continuousfy moored, docked, or stored over water, and shall require centralization of all common facilities and activities in the most suitabfe locations on the lot to minimize topographic and vegetation alterations. They shall also require all parking areas, storage buildings, and other facilities to be screened by vegetation or topography as much as practical from view from the public water, assuming summer, leaf-on conditions. (Ord. I f56, 12-12-1994) 1016.16: STRUCTURE DESIGN STANDARDS: A. Placement of Structures on Lots: When more ttmn one setback applies to a sile, structures and f2cihties shaH be located to meet the most restrlctive setbacks. 'Nhere slmctures exist on the <)cljoining lc}ts on bOlO sides of a proposed building site, structure setbacks may be altered without a variance to confoml to the average setback of adjoining stmctures from the ordinary high water level, provided the proposed buifding site is Ilot located m a shore impact zone or in a bluff impact zone. Structures shall be located as follows: At! other structure setback requirements shalf be as stated in the underlying zoning district for each parcel. STRUCTURE SETBACKS FROM Wi\. TER BODY Type of Water Body Stmcture Setback from Water Body Structure Setback from Bluff Roads, Drivtway~ Purk~ng and Other Impervious Surface or Setback ! rv1ax imum Bldg!Stmctme Height 4 MnDNR and City Pubfic Waters 75 Ft '.' 30Ft, 30 Ft. 30 FI. Wetfand 50 Ft. L,J 10 Ft. ",' Not Applicable Not Applicable 30 FI.' 10 Ft. ~FI. 30 Ft. --..------- Storm Pond I. Setback is measured from the normal ordinary high water level. 2. Setback is measured from the wetland or pond boundary. 3. One water~ oriented accessory structure designed in accordance with subsection 1016.17C of Ihis ch<lpter may be set back ~~ minimum distance of 10 feet from the ordinary high water level. 4. See subsection I016.17G of this chapter. 5. A 30 foot setback from road or parking surfaces may include a combination of land \vithin rights of way and adjacenl 10 the right of way, as well as curb and gutter controlling runoff and sediment to a storm pond. Pedestrian tr~ils shall be exempt from setb<"lck requirements. B. Additional Structure Standards for All Districts: ]. Bluff Impact Zones: Structures and accessory facilities. except stairways and landings, shall not be placed within bluff impact zones. 2. Commerciaf Or Industrial Land Uses: Commercial or industrial land uses without water oriented uses shall be located on lots or parcets without public waters frontage, or, if located on lots or parcels with public waters frontage, the principal stmcture, accessory buildings and parking arcas, shall either be set back one hundred fifty feet (l 50') from the ordinary high water level or be set back one hundred feet (100') and be fitly percent (50%) screened by opaque vegetation from view from the wa1er by vegetation or topography, assuming summer, leaf-on conditions, (Ord. f] 56, 12-] 2-1994) 3. Fences; In bluff impact, shoreland, and wetland zones, fences shall be set back the same distance from the shoreline as required for the principal structure or attached deck on the lot, except that a fence on a lot with a precxisting principal structure and attached deck may extend to the same setback as the deck or the stmernre. Fences shall be of similar design, texture, and eolor as thc principal stmcture or shall be of an earth tone or color and material. Fences used for safety or containment may be set within twenty jjve feci (.25') of the OHWL. Such fences shall be a maximum of twenty five percent (25%) opaque, and no more than forty two inches (4.2") in height. Such fences shall be clad in earth tone coatings. With ihe exception of regulations in this subsection, fences in bluff impacl, shorcland, and wetland zones shall meet all height and setback requirements of section 1012.02 of this title. Fences placed on the TOad side of a lot with water or wetland frontage shall comply with front yard fence ,equirements of section 1012.02 of this title. (Ord. 1270,9-23.2002) 1016.17: GENERr\L DESIGN CRITERIA FOR STRUCTURES: A. Low Floor Elevations: All habitable structures constmcted within the overlay district shall he built with their lowest floor. including basement, no lower than the following elevation criteria, whichever provides the greater degree of protection as detennined by the city engineer: L Two feet (2') above the 100-year flood elevation, if known; or 2. At least three feet (3') above the highest known water level. or three feet (3') above the ordinary high water level, whichever is higher; or 3. At least three feet (3') above thc "wetland boundary" as defined in Section to 16.05 of this Chapter. The City Engineer shall develop and maintain a list of etevations ofknown IOO-year nood levels. ordinary high water levefs, highest known water levels and wetfand boundary levels as they become available through special studies or the Minnesota Depanment of Natural Resources. B. Low Floor Elevations Exceptions: A variance may be granted from the elevation requirements specified in subsection A above only where a hardship is determined and provided the structure is flood-proofed according to State and Federal standards for floodplain areas. Water-oriented accessory structures may have the lowest floor placed lower than the elevation determined in subsection A if the structure is constmcted of flood-resistant materials to the elevation, electrical and mechanical equipment is placed above the elevation and, if long duration flooding is anticipated. the stmcture is built to withstand ice action and wind-driven waves and debris. C. Permitted Water-Oriented Accessory Structures: Each lot may have one water.oriented nonhabitable accessory structure not meeting the normal stlUcture setback in subsection 10 16.16A of this Chapter if this water- oriented accessory structure complies with the following provisions: 1. Water oriented accessory stnlcture dimensional requirements: a. Ma"'C.imum floor area: 250 square feet b. Maximum width as viewed from water: 12 feet c. Maximum height: Setback from ordinary high water: Boathouse setback from ordinary high water level: Side yard setback from property line: Detached deck height above grade: 8 feet 10 feet d. , e. 10 feet" f 20 ICct g. , 50% of distance between ordinary high water mark and the stnlcture setback from the water '* Afso perrnitled for docks, and off-season storage of Ice fishing houses and docks. 2. The stmcture or facility shall be constructed of material architecturally similar in design, texture, and color to the principal stmcture on the lot; the design shall be reviewed by the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. 3. The stmcture shall be screened a minimum of fifty percent (50%) by opaque vegetation or topography on the three (3) walls seen from the lake with ecologically suited landscaping landward of the ordinary high water level from the lake. 4. The roof shall not be used as a deck or used as a storage area. 5. The structure or facility shall not be designed or used for human habitation and shall not contain utility systems. D. Stairways, Chair Lifts, and Stair and Deck Landings: Stairways and chair lifts shall be used for achieving access up and do\vn bluffs and steep slopes to shore areas. S"lairways and Efts shaH meet the loHo\ving design requirements: t. Stairways and chair tifts shall not exceed lour leet (4') in width on residentiallms. Wider stairways may be used for commercial properties, public open-space recreational properties, and planned unit developments; 2. Stair and deck landings for stairways and chair lifts on residentiat lots shalf not exceed forty eight (48) square feet in area. Landings larger than fony eight (48) square leet may be used for commercial properties, public open-space recreational properties, and ptanned unit developments; 3. Canopies or roofs shall not be permitted on stairways, chair fifts, or stair or deck landings; 4. Stairways, chair hfts, and stair or deck landings shalf be either constructed above the ground on posts or pilings, or placed into the ground. provided they are designed and built in a manner that ensmes control of soil erOSIOn; 5. Stairways, chair lifts, and stair or deck landings shall be located in the most visually inconspicuous portions of lots, as viewed from the surface of the public water assuming summer, !eaf-on conditions, whenever practical: and 6. Facilities such as ramps, chair lifts, or mobility paths for physicalfy handicapped persons shall be pemlitted for achieving access to shore areas, provided that the dimensional and perfonnance standards of subsections 1 through 5 are complied with in addition to the requirements of Minnesota Rules, chapter 1340. E. Signiticant Historic Sites: No structure may be placed on a significant historic site in a manner that affects the values of the site unless adequate information about the site has been removed and documented in a public repository. F. Steep Slopes, Visibility and Erosion: The Public Works and Community Development Directors shall evaluate possible soil erosion impacts and devefopment visibility from public waters prior to issuance of a permit for construction of roads, driveways, structures, or other improvements on steep sfopes. When determined necessary, conditions shall be attached to the permit to prevent erosion and preserve existing vegetation, screening of structures, vehicles, and other facilities as viewed from the s.urface of public waters, assunling summer, leaJ:'on vegetation. G. Height of Structures: All structures in residential districts, except steeptes and chinmeys from churches and institutional uses, shall not exceed thirty feet (30') in height. H. Placement and Design of Roads, Driveways, and Parking Areas: I . Public and private roads and parking areas shalf bc designed to take advantage of natural vegetation and topography to achieve maximum screening from view from public waters. The Public Works Director shall review all roads and parking areas to ascertain they are designed and constructed to minimize and control erosion to public waters, consistent with the field office technicat guides of the Ramsey County Soil and Water Conservation District, or other applicable technical materials and best management guidelines. 2. Roads, driveways, and parking areas shall meet stnlcture setbacks outlined in subsection J016.16A and shall not be placed within bluff and shore impact zones, when other reasonable and feasible placement alternatives exist. ffno alternatives exist, they may be placed within these arellS, and shall be designed to minimize adverse impacts. 3. Public and pri vate watercraft, canoe rack storage, access ramps, approach roads, and access-related parking areas may be placed witbin shore impact zones provided the vegetative screening and erosion control conditions of this subsection arc met. For private facilities, the grading and tilling provisions of Section 1016.25 of this Chapter shall be mel. (Ord. If 56, 12-12-94) 1016.18: DESIGN CRITERIA FOR COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, PUBLIC AND SEMI- PUBLIC USES: A. Uses With Water-Oriented Needs: Surface water-oriented commercial uses and industrial, public, or semi- public uses with similar needs to have access to and use of public waters may be located on parcels or lots with frontage on public waters. Those uses with water.oriented needs must meet impervious coverage limits, setbacks, and other zoning standards in this Chapter. The uses shall also be designed to incorporate topographic and vegetative screening of parking areas lmd structures. B. Uses Without Water-Oriented Needs: Uses and surface parking without water-oriented needs shall be located on lots or parcels without public waters frontage, or, if located on lots or parcefs with public waters frontage, must be set back double the normal ordinary high water tevel setback and shall be screened by fifty percent (50%) opaque or more screen from view from the water by vegetation or topography, assuming summer, Ieat: on conditions. (Ord. 1156, f2-f2-94) 1016.19: NOTIFICATIONS TO THE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES: A. Notice of Public Hearings: Copies of aff notices of any public hearings to consider variances, ordinance amendments, PUDs, or conditional uses affecting a MnDNR designated shoreland district shall be sent to the MnDNR, Division of Waters Regional Hydrologist and postmarked at least ten (10) days before the hearings. Notices of hearings to consider proposed subdivisions/plats shaff include copies of the subdivision/plat. B. Notice of Approval: A copy of approved amendments and subdivisions/plats, and final decisions granting variances, PUDs or conditional uses in a MnDNR designated shoreland district shall be sent to the MnDNR, Division of Waters Regionat Hydrologist and postmarked within ten (10) days affinal action. (Ord. 1 t56, 12- ]2-94) 1016.20: VARIANCES: A. Procedure: Variances in these overlay districts may only be granted in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, chapter 462. A variance shall not circumvent the general purposes and intent of this Chapter. No variance shall be granted for a use that is prohibi1ed within the zoning district in which the subject property is located, Conditions may be imposed by the City Council when granting of a variance to ensure compliance and to protect adjacent properties and the public interest. B. Notice of Approval: When a variance is approved in a MnDNR designated shoreland district by the City Council after the Department of Natural Resources has formally recommended denial in the hearing record, the notification of the approved variance required in subsection JOt6.19B shall also include the BOli'rd of Adjustment's summary of the public record/testimony, the findings of facts, and conclusions which supported the issuance of the variance. (Ord. t ]56, ]2-12-94) 10]6.21: CONDITIONAL USES: Conditional uses allowable within shoreland areas shall be subject to the review and approval procedures of this Code. The following additional evaluation criteria and conditions apply within shoreland areas: A, Evaluation Criteria: A thorough evaluation of the waterbody and the topographic. vegetation, and soil conditions on the site shall be made to ensure: I. The prevention of soil erosion or other possible pollution of public waters, both during and after constmction; 2. The visibility of stmctures and other facilities as viewed from public waters is limited; 3. The types, uses, and numbers of watercraft that the project will generate can be safely accommodated on the site; 4. The impact the proposed use may have on the water quality of the water body is not excessive. B. Conditions Attached to Conditional Use Penl1its: The City Council, upon consideration ufthe criteria listed above and the purposes of this Chapter may attach sllch conditions to the issuance of the conditional use permits as it deems necessary. Such conditions may include, but are not limited to, the following: t. Increased setbacks from the ordinary high water level; 2. Limitations on the natural vegetation to be removed or the requirement that additional vegetation be planted; and 3. Special provisions for the location, design. and use of stmctures, watercraft launching and docking areas, and vehicle parking areas. (Ord 1]56,12-12-94) 1016.22: NONCONFORMITIES: Alllegalfy established nonconfOffilities as of the date ofthis Code amendment may continue, bllt they shaH be manage,l according to applicable State statlltes and other regulations of the City for the subjects ofal/erations lmd additions, repair after damage, discontinuance of use and intensification of use. The following standards apply to nonconforming lots and uses in the shoreland management areas: A. Construction on Nonconforming Lots of Record: I. Lots of record in the office on the County Recorder on the date of enactment of the City shore land controls (March 27, 1974) that do not meet the requirements of this Chapter may be allowed as building sites without variances from lot size requirements provided; the use is permitted in the zoning district; all sanitary requirements of the City Code are comptied with insofar as practical; and ihe minimum lot size and length of water frontage shall be not less than seventy percent (70%) of standard lot water frontage requiremems; the lot has been in separate ownership from abutting lands since the original adoption of the City shoreland conlrols (March 27,1974). 2. A variance from setback requirements shall be obtained before any use or building pennit is issued for a lot. In evaluating the variance, the Board of Adjustment shafl consider, in addition to the requirements of Section 1016.20, public utilities available to the lot and shall deny the variance if adequate facilities cannot be provided. 3, If, in a group of two (2) or more contiguous lots under one ownership since the original adoption of the City shoreland controfs (March 27, 1974), any individuaf fot docs not meetthe requirements of Section 1016.17, the lot shall not be considered as a separate parcel of land for the purposes of development. The lot shafl be combined with the one or more contiguous lots so they equal one or more parcels ofland, each meeting the requirements of Sections 1016.14 through 1016.16 of this Chapter. B. Additions/Expansions to Nonconforming Stmctures: All additions or expansions to the outside dimensions of an existing nonconfonning structure must meet the setback, height, and other requirements of Sections 1016.14 through 1016.16. Any deviation from these requirements may only be authorized by a variance pursuantto Section fOf 6.20. C. Deck Additions: Deck additions may be aflowed, without a variance, to a structme which does not meet the required setback from the ordinary high water fevel, if atl of the following criteria and standards are met: I. The structure existed prior to the date the City's original shoreland structure setbacks were established on March 27, ] 974. 2. A thorough evaluation of the property and structure reveals no reasonahfe location for a deck meeting or exceeding the existing ordinary high water level setback of the structure. 3. The new deck encroachment toward the ordinary high water level does not exceed fifteen percent {I 5%) of the existing setback of the structure from the ordinary high water level or does not encroach closer than thirty feet (30'), whichever is more restrictive; and the deck shafl be constructed of materials similar to the materials of the principal structure, wood, or earth tone; and the new deck shall not be roofed or screened. D. Existing Decks: Existing decks, at the date of adoption of this Chapter, which meet the required setbacks and have had valid building permits, may be enclosed as part of the structure. Deck extensions beyond fmd from a nonconforming. enclosed deck which would increase the nonconforming setback, shafl not be pennitted. (Ord. 1156, 12-t2-94) 1016.23: SUBDIVISION/PLA TTING PROVISIONS: A. Land Suitability: Each lor created through subdivision, including plarmed unit developments authoriz.ed under Chapter 1008 of this Title and Section 1016.24 of this Chapter, shafl be suitable for the proposed use as defined by the suitability analysis. Suitability analysis shafl consider susceptibility to flooding, existence of wetlands, soit and rock formations with severe limitations for development, severe erosion potential, steep topography, availability of City sewer and water, near-shore aquatic conditions unsuitable for water-based recreation, important fish and wildlife habitat, presence ofsigniJicant historic sites, or any other feature of the natural land likely to be hamlfuJ to the health, safety, or weffarc of future residents onhe proposed subdivision or of the community. B. Consistency With Other Controls: Subdivisions shall conform to all official controls of this community. A subdivision shall not be approved where a later variance Irom one or more standards in official controls would be needed to use the lots for their intended purpose. Each lot shall meet the minimum lot size and dimensional requirements of Sections 1016.f4 through tOf6.16. C. Information Requirements: Sufficient information shall be submitted by the applicant for the community to make a detennination of land suitability. The inf()rmation shall include at least the following: I. Topographic contours at two foot (2') intervals or less from City public works maps or more accurate sources, showing limiting site characteristics; 2. The surface water features required in Minnesota Statutes, section 505.02, subdivision I, to be shown on plats, obtained from United States Geological Survey quadrangle topographic maps or more accurate sources; 3. Adequate soil information to determine suitability for building and public utilities for every lot from the most current existing sources or from field investigations such as soil borings or other methods; 4. Information regarding adequacy of domestic City water supply; extent of anticipated vegetation and topographic alterations; near-shore aquatic conditions, including depths, types of bottom sediments, and aquatic vegetation; and proposed methods for controlling storm water runoff and erosion, both during and after construction activities; 5. Location of fOO-year flood plain areas and f100dway districts from existing adopted maps or data; and 6. A line or contour representing ordinary high water level, the toe and the top ofbluffs, and the minimum buifding setback distances from the top of the bluff and the lake or stream. D, Dedications: When an on-site storm water ponding area is required by a project to store surface water nmoff, the City may require easements over natural drainage or ponding areas for future maimenance of storm water and significant wetlands, E, Platting: All subdivisions that create three (3) or more lots or parcels that are two and one-half (2 !i2) acres or less in size shall be processed as a pfat in accordance with City Subdivision Regulations'. (Ord. 1156, 12-12- 94) 1016.24: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS: A. Types ofPUDs Permissible: Planned unit developments (PUDs) are allowed in shoreland areas for new projects on undeveloped land, redevelopment of previously built sites, or conversions of existing buildings and land, provided they comply with the requirements of this Section. B. Processing of PUDs: Planned unit developments shall be processed as a rezoning, subject to the procedures in Chapter 1008 of this Title. The total project density shall not exceed the allowable densities calculated in the project density evafuation procedures in subsections E and F. Approval cannot occur on any PUD until the Stale environmental review process (EA W/EIS) when required, is complete. C. Application For A PUD: The applicant for a PUD must submit the application documents listcd in Chapter 1008 of this Title prior to review and final action being taken on the application request. D. Site Suitable Area Evaluation: Proposed new or expansions to existing planned unit developments within the overlay district shall be evaluated using the following procedures and standards to determine the suitabfe area for the construction site of the development. The suitable area shall be determined by excluding from the project development area all wetlands, bluffs, or land below the ordinary high water level of public waters. E. Residential PUD Base Density Evaluation: The suitable area within each tier of lots adjacent to a MnDNR shorefand or City classified lake shall meet or exceed the suitability analyses herein and the City's design criteria. 1. The maximum f100r area coverage of the site shall be thiny percent (30%) for any residential PUD within the overfay district. 2. Including both existing and proposed units and sites, the inside building area sizes need not include decks, patios, stoops, steps, accessory structures. or porches and basements, unless they are habitable space. F. Commercial PUD Base Density Evaluation: i Title 11 of this Code. 1. The floor area percent coverage of the site shall not exceed thirty percent (JO~'O) for nny tom!lJt'rcla~ planned unit devdopment \vithin the overby dis.trict. 2. Including both existing and proposed units and silt's, cumplltatJDi! of inside building area Si.7CS ne,~d 11m lnclllde decks, patios, stoops~ steps, accessory ,s-ITtlctures, Of porch{;~ and basements,. unkss they me habil~;jble or occupied space. G. Maintenance and Administration Requirements: Before final DpproV.:1f of ~l planned unit development, adequate provisions shaH be developed for preservmion and mainfenance in perpetuity of open spaces and Jor the continued existence and functioning of the development. I. Open Space Preservation: Deed restrictions, covenants, permanent easements, public dedication and acceptance, or other equally ,effective and permanent means shall be provided to ensure long.teml preservmion and maintenance of open space. The instmments shall include aJ! of the following protections' a, Business and industrial uses (for residential PUDs) prohibited; b. Vegetation and topographic alterations other than routine maintenance prohibited: c. Constmction of additional buildings or slorage of vehicles and other materials not owned by the occupants prohibited; d. Uncontrolled beaching of watercraft prohibited. 2. Development Organization and Functioning: All residential planned unit developments shall have an owners association with the following features: a. Membership shall be mandatory for each dwelting unit or site purchaser and any successive purchasers; b. Each member shall pay a pro rata share of the association's expenses, and unpaid fees may hecome hens on units or sites; c. Fees shall be adjustable to accommodate changing conditions; and d. The association shall be responsible for insurance. taxes, and maintenance of alt commonly owned property and facilities. 3. Open Space Requirements: Plarmed unit developments within shoreland dls'rlcts shall contain open space meeting all of the following criteria: a. At least fifty percent (50%) of the total project area shalt be preserved as open space. (Dwellmg units or sites, road rights ofwaYl land covered by road surfaces, parking meas. Of structures. except wate-r-onenled accessory structures or facilities, are developed areas and sha!! not be includcd m the computallOn of minimum open space); b. Open space shall include areas with physical characteristics unsuitable for development in their natural state, and areas containing significant historic sites or unpl311ed cemeteries: c. Open space may include outdoor recreational facilities for use by owners of dwelling units or sjtes~ by guests staying in commercial dwelling units or Slles, and by the general public; d. Open space shaH not include commercial facilities or uses, but may rnntain wfHer-orienled 3ccessory stmctures or facilities; e. The appearance of open space areas, including topography. vegetation, and allowable uses. shall be preserved by use of restrictive deed covenants, pennanent easemenlS, public dedication and acceptance, or other equally effective and perman em means; and f. The shore impact zone, based on Honnal structure setbacks. shall be includc-d as open space. For residential PUDs, at least fifty percent (50%) oflhc shore impact zone area of existing developments or al least seventy percent (70%) of the shore impact zone area of new developments shall be preserved in a natural or existing vegetative state. For commercial PUDs, al least lifty percent (50%) or the shore impact zone shall be preserved in its natuml state. 4. Erosion Control and Storm Water Management: Erosion control and stoml water man3gement plans shaH be developed and the PUD shali be: a. Designed, and the construction managed, to minimize the likelihood of seriolls t'rosion occurring either during or after construction. This shfdl be accomplished by limiting the amount and kngth of time of bare ground exposure. Temporary ground covers, sediment entrapment facilities,vegewted buffer strips, or other appropriate techniques shaH be used to minimize erosion ir:npacls on surface "valer feflIllTi:s:, and b. Designed and constructed to effectively manage reasonably expeclec! qmmtilic;} and qUDlities 'of Slonn water runotT. Impervious surface coverage within any lot shall not exceed twenty five percent (25%) of the tier area, except that for commerciaf PUDs thirty five percent (35%) impervious surface coverage may be allowed in the first tier of general development lakes with an approved stonn water managemen1 plan and consistency with this Chapter. 5. Centralization and Design of Facilities: Centralization and design oflacilities and structures shall be done according to the following standards: a. Planned unit developments shall be connected to publicly owned water supply and sewer systems; b. Dwelling units or buifding sites shall be clustered into one or more groups and located on suitable areas of the site. They shall be designed and located to meet or exceed the following dimensional standard for the refevant shorefand classification: setback from the ordinary high water level, elevation above the surface water features, and maximum height. Setbacks from the ordinary high water level shall be in accordance with subsection 1016. f 4B I of this Chapter for developments with density increases; c, Shore recreation facilities, including but not limited to swimming areas, docks, and watercraft mooring areas and launching ramps, shall be centralized and located in areas suitable for them. Evaluation of suitability shall include consideration ofland slope, water depth, vegetation, soils, depth to ground water and bedrock, or other relevant factors. The number of spaces provided for continuous beaching, mooring, or docking of watercraft shall not exceed one for each allowable dwelling unit or site in the first tier (notwithstanding existing mooring sites in an existing commercially used harbor). Launching ramp facilities, including a dock for loading and unloading equipment, may be provided for use by occupants of dwelling units or sites located in other tiers; d. Stmctures, parking areas, and other facilities shall be treated to reduce visibility as viewed from public waters and adjacent shorelands by vegetation, topography, increased setbacks, color, or other means acceptable to the City, assuming summer, leaf-on conditions. Vegetative and topographic screening shall be preserved, if existing, or may be required to be provided; e. Accessory stmctures and facilities, except water oricntcd accessory structures, shall meet the !equired principal stmcture setback and must be centralized; and f. Water-oriented accessory stmctures and facilities may be allowed if they meet or exceed design standards contained in Section 1016.15 of this Chapter and are centralized. (Ord. 1I56, 12-12-94) 1016.25: GRADING, FILLING AND LAND ALTERATION: A. Pennit Required: No person, linn or corporation may engage in any excavation, grading, surfacing or filling of land in the City without first securing a pennit as set forth in this Section. 1. Permit from City EngineerlPublic Works Director: A pennit is required from the City Engineer/Public Works Director or designee, for any of the fonowing activities: a. Pfacement of or grading of more than ten (10) cubic yards of material on steep slopes adjacent to lakes and wetlands or within the shore or bfuff impact zones. b. Placement of or grading of more than fifty (50) cubic yards of earthen material anywhere in the City, c. Where fining or grading occurs within ten feet (10') of a property line or when such activity alters the drainage pattems of adjacent properties, 2. Permit from City Council: A pennit from the City Council is required for any projects meeting the fonowing criteria: a. Any fin, grading, or drainage of a public water or a wetland, provided the City Councif first detennines that the project is either exempt from the f 991 Wetlands Conservation Act or certifies the repfacement of any loss of wetland area, vafues and functions in accordance with Minnesota Rules, chapter 8420 as amended. Questions relating to wetland type, location, area, functions and values must be referred to the technical advisory panel established by Minnesota Statutes section I 03G .2242 as amended. b. For any fining or excavating on developed land zoned R-t or R-2 where the site is less than one acre and the fin or excavation exceeds five hundred (500) cubic yards. c. For any tilling or excavating on developed land zoned R-I or R-2 where the site is one acre or greater and the proposed lilt/excavation exceeds one thousand (1,000) cubic yards, d, For any filling or excavating on undeveloped land zoned R-I or R-2 where the site is less than onc acre and the proposed till/excavation exceeds two thousand (2.000) cubic yards. e. For any filling or excavating on l.wdeveloped land zoned R-I or R-2 l.Jvhere lh.e site is gremer ~han one ncre and the pruposed lIB/excavation exceeds fOUT thousand (4,,000) cubic yards_ 1. For any filling or excavating on developed cornmerciallindustriai property where the siic ~s less than two and one-half (2 J/2) acres and the proposed lililcxcavalion excceds two thousand five hundred (2,500) cubic yards. g. For any filling or excavating on deveJoped commercial/industrial property where the site is greater than two and one.half (2 J/2) acres and the proposed fill/excavation exceeds live thousand (5,000) cubic yards. h. For any filling or excavating on undeveloped commercial/industrial property where the site is less than two and one-half (2 1/2) acres and the proposed fill/excavation exceeds five thousand (5,000) cubic yards. i. For any filling or excavating on undeveloped cOITnnerciallindustrial property where the site is greater than two and one-half (2 1/2) acres and the proposed fill/excavation exceeds ten thousand (10,000) cubic yards. B. Applications For Penn its, Additional Information: 1\fi applications for pennits for grading and filing activities or fand disturbances within the overlay district resulting in more than one acre of exposed soif shalf be accompanied by plans, specifications, and completion schedules in conformance with the "Ramsey County Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook" prepared by the Ramsey Soil and Water Conservation District, 1989 as amended. C. Building Pennits. Speciaf Provisions: All building pennits involving any excavation. fill or grading shall contain special provisions that speciry; I. That the permil1ee is responsible for the cleanup and any damages resulting from so if eroded from the building site onto public streets and stomr sewer system andlor any adjoining private property; and 2. That the penl1inee shall install and maintain either silt fencing afong the lot boundaries where runoff is possible to public streets and adjoining private property or maintain a temporary mulch on all exposed soil at a rate specified by the City Engineer. " D. Shoreland Alterations: Alterations of vegetation and topography shall be regulated to prevent erosion into pubJi<: waters, fix nutrients, preserve shoreland aesthetics, preserve historic values, prevent bank Slumping, and protect fish and wildlife habitat. Fill and grading activilies within shoreland shall compty with subsections lOt 6.25/\.2a through 1\2] and 10 16.25B. E. Vegetation Alterations in Shore land Areas: I. Exemption: Vegctation alteration neeessary for rhe constmction of stmctures and roads and parking areas regutated by Sections I Of 6. 14 through 1016.]6 of this Chapter arc exempt from the vegetation alteration standards that follow. 2. Vegetation Alteration Standards: Removal or alteration of vegetation is allowed subject to the following standards: a, Intensive vegetation clearing within the shore and bluff impact zones and on steep slopes is not allowed. Intensive vegetation clearing outside of the impact zones is allowable as a conditional lIse if an erosion control and sedimentation plan is developed and approved by the Ramsey County Soil and Water Conservation District. b. In shore and bluff impact zones and on steep slopes, limited clearing of trees and shrubs and cUlting, pnllling, and trimming of trees may be allowed to provide a view to the water from the principal dwefling site and to accommodate the placement of lawns and new vegetarion. stairways and landings, picnic areas, access paths, beach and watercraft access areas, and permitted water-oriented accessory stmctures or facilities, provided that the screening of stmctures, vehicles, or other facilities as viewed trom the water, assuming SU111mer, leaf-on conditions, is not substantially reduced; and c. The above provisions are not applicable to the removal of trees, limbs, or branches that are dead, diseased, or pose safety hazards. 3. Connections to Public Waters: Excavations where lhe intended purpose is connection to a pubfic water, such as boat stips, canals, fagoons, and harbors, shall be controfled by subsections A through D of this scction. Pennission for excavations may be given only .after the commissioner has approved the proposed connection to public waters and other needed approvals have been Dbtained. (Ord. 1156, 12-]2-1994) 1016.26: STORJ\1 WATER MANAGEMENT: The following general and specific standards shall apply to all developments within the city: A. General Standards: I. Existing Natural Drainageways: \Vhen possible, existing natural drainageways, and vegetated soil surfaces shall be used to convey, store, filter, and retain stonn water runoff before discharge to public waters. 2, Minimum Disturbance: Development shall be planned and conducted in a manner that will minimize the extent of dishlrbed areas, runoff velocities, erosion potential, and reduce and delay runoff volumes. Disturbed areas shall be stabilized and protected as soon as possible and facilities or methods used to retain sediment on the site. 3. Constructed Facilities: When development density, topographic features, and soil and vegetation conditions are not sufficient to adequately handle storm water runoff using natural features and vegetation, various types of constructed facilities such as diversions, settling basins, skimming devices, dikes, waterways, and ponds may be used. Preference shall be given to designs using surface drainage, vegetation, and infiltration rather than buried pipes and manmade materials and facilities. B. Specific Standards: I. Impervious Surface Coverage: Impervious surface coverage of a site shall not exceed twenty five percent (25%) of the site area in a shoreland or wetland overfay district unless storm water is conveyed to an approved, on-site or regional stonn water ponding/retention facility designed to accommodate the increased runoff prior to discharge from the site into public waters or wetlands. 2. Review by City Engineer: All proposed stonn water facilities shall be reviewed by the city engineer and certified for compliance with the city's surface water management plan, National Urban Runoff Program (NURP) standards, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's (MPCA) Urban Best Management Practices, and any established standards ofthe water management organization having jurisdiction in the project area. 3. Commercial, Industrial, and Residential Development Affectation: All commercial and industrial developments and redevelopments affecting more than five (5) acres ofland and all residentiaf developments affecting more than five (5) acres of land shafI: a. Be served by stonn water ponding facilities, on- or off-site, designed to remove a minimum of ninety percent (90%) of total suspended solids resulting trom the runoff from a one inch (I ") rainfall event, and b. Within the development, provide for settling chambers, sumps, dry ponds or other devices to provide for the filtering or settling of fine sands prior to discharge into the city's stonn water system. 4, Private Stonn Water Facilities: All private stonn water facilities shall be maintained in proper condition consistent with the performance standards for which they were originafly designed. All settled materials from ponds, sumps, grit chambers, and other devices, including settled solids, shall be removed and properly disposed of on a five (5) year interval. One to five (5) year waivers from this requirement may be granted by the city engineer when the owner presents evidence that the facility has additional capacity to remove settled solids in accordance with the original design capacity. 5. Inventory of Private Stonn Water Facilities: Upon adoption of this chapter, the city engineer shall inventory and maintain a data basis for afl private stonn water facilities requiring maintenance to assure compliance with this section. (Ord. 1239,4-24-2000) 1016.27: AMENDMENT: This chapter may be amended whenever the public necessity and the general welfare require such amendment by foflowing the procedure specified ill this section. A. Request For Amendment: Requests for amendment of this chapter shafl be initiated by a petition of the owner or owners of the actual property, a recommendation of the ptanning commission or by action of the City Council. B. Application: An application for an amendment shall be filed with the zoning administrator. All applications for changes in the boundaries of the zoning district which are initiated by the petition of the owner or owners of the property. the zoning of which is proposed to be changed, shall be accomplished by" map orpJat showing the lands proposed to be changed and all land, within five hundred feet (500') of the boundaries of the property proposed 10 be rezoned, together with a certillcale of abstract showing the names of registered property owners within three hundred lifiy fect (350'). C. Notice: Notice shall be sent by letter, when an amendment application has been liIed for change in district boundary, to all property owners within two hnndred feet (200') as to the time and place ofthc public heming. D. Public Hearing: Upon receipt in proper form of the applicarion and other requested material, the planning commission shall conduct a public hearing in the manner prescribed in the zoning code as described in section 1015,03 of this title. E. Fee: to defray the administrative costs of processing of requests for an amendment to this chapter, a fee of one hundred dollars ($JOO,OO) shall be paid by petOitioner. (Ord, 722, 3-18-1974) RuJe C: Storm-Water MarlHgemenr Plans I Rice Creek Watershed District P~Jgc i or 4 RIt:E CREEK WATERSHED ISTRllClI Home" Rok.s" RCWDRtlles Rule C: Storm-Water Management Plans 1. Policy. It is the policy of the Board of Managers to: . (a) Manage stormwater and snowmelt runoff on a regional or subwatershed basis and promote natural infiltration of runoff throughout the District to: o (I) Provide effective water quality treatment and where possible provide such treatment prior to discharge to surface waterbodies and wetfands. o (2) Ensure.that future peak rates of runoff are less than or equal to existing mles. o (3) Maximize infiltration and control run.off volume increase. . (b) Require stormwaler facilities to he constructed on individual sites where regional facilities are not avaiJable. 2. Regulation. A permit and storm water management pJan is required under this rule for new development. redeveJopment. or additions to an existing site. 3. Design Criteria For Stormwater Management Plans. Stormwater management plans must comply with the following criteria: . (a) A hydrograph method based on sound hydrotogic Iheory musl be used to analyze stormwater runoff for the design or analysis of flows and water feveJs within and off the project site. . (b) Stormwater runoff rates for the proposed project mllst not exceed pre. project runoff rJles for the crilical one- year or two-year and 100-year frequency events. . (c) Regional detention basins will be utilized 10 manage peak flow rates and meet water quaJity objectives where possibfe. On-site detention basins will be utilized when regional basins are not III place or are not feasible. . (d) Analysis of flood levels. storage volumes. and flow rates for waterbodies and detention basins must be hased on the range ofrainfafJ and snow melt durations which produces the criticalthighest) ilood levels and discharges. . (e) Detention basins must be designed to provide: o (I) An outlet structure to control the I-year or 2-year & 100.yr frequency evenls '" pre-project peak runoff sites, o (2) An idemitied overflow spillway sufficienlty stabilized to convey nows greater than Ihe I OO-year critical stonn event. o (3) Access for future maintenance. . (I) Permanent sedimentation and water quality ponds are required and must be designed to provide: c (I) Water quality features consistent with NURP criteria and District wet pond criteria (see appendix). o (2) A permanent wet poof with dead storage of at least equal to the runoff from a 2.5 rainfall over the area tributary to the pond. o (3) An outlet stmeture capabJe of preventing migration of noating debris and oils for at least the one-year storm. o (4) Access for future maintenance. . (g) The proposed project must not adversely affect water Jevels off Ihe site during or after construction. . (h) Stormwater Management Pfans under this rule must conform wilh approved Municipal Stormwater hup:/ /www.ricecreekwd.com/rules/rcwcl/c I 1/13/2006 Rule C: Storm-Water Management Plans I Rice Creek Watershed District P:,gc- 2 of 4 Management Plans. f8 (i) Outfan structures within wetlands and public waters and public \\fIjters weUands Blust incorporate a stiHing- basin, surge-basin. energy dissipater, placement of ungrouted natural rocK ripnip or other devices to m!njmize disturbance and erosion of natural shoreline i:l!1d bed resulting from SlOnrnvmer disch;]rges. . W All new residential, commercial, industrial and other habitable or non-habitable stmctures must be constmcted so that the lowest floor elevations are a minimlim of two fect above the eritient event lOO-year high water elevation and are one foot above the overflow elew-ltion of nearby surface \.vaterbodies \vetlands and stonnwater basins. Within landlocked basins. lowest floor elevations must be at least Dnc foot abDvc the surveycd basin ovcrflow elevation. . (k) Development resufting in the creation of impervious surfaces must explicitly address use of best management practices (BMPs) to fIrst limit the loss of pervious area; and second, to infiltrate runoff which does occur from impervious areas to the extent feasible considering site-specific conditions. BMPs include the use of vegetated swales, pond outlets perched above groundwater levels, use of infiltratlon systems, roof drainage to pervious areas. minimum of twenty percent pervious surface, use of depressed/casual storage arens, and minimization of the number and width of parking stalls and use of deep-rooted native vegetation, and lllmOV\'er "mral section" roads. The goaf of these BMP, is to incorporate practices into the design which are capable of infiltrating the impervious slIrface runoff from the Mpls-St.Palll median storm (0.34 inches) in seventy.two hours. Infillration volume will be calcufated using the appropriate hydrologic soil group classification and saturated infiltration rate from the table below. Hydrologic Infiltration Soil Group A B C n Rate Soil Textures 0.50 in/hrsand, loamy sand, or sandy foam 0.25 in/hr silt foam or loam 0.10 in/hrsandy elay loam 0.03 in/hrclay loam. sitty clay loam, silty clay, or clay Somce: Urban Hydrology jlJr Small WaTersheds, SCS, June 1986. Infiltration area will be limited to the horizontaf areas subject to prolonged welting. Areas of pennanent pools tend to lose infiltration capacity over time and will not be accepted as an infiltration practice. . (1) Landlockcd basins may be provided with oUllets only if they: o (l) Retain a hydrologic regime which complies with District Wetland Alteration Rule F, o (2) Provide sufficient dead storage volume to retain back-to-back 100-year, twenty-fom-hour rainfalls and runoff. o (3) Do nO! create adverse downstream tlooding or waler quality conditions as a resuft of increased disch<lrge rate or volume, or other factors. . (m) All stormwatcr management stmctmes and facilities must be properly maintained in perpetuity to assure that they continue to function as originally designed, This maintenance responsibility must be assumed either by the municJpalirya€™s accepting the required easements dedicated to stormwatcr management purpos.es, or by the applicant executing and recording a maintenance agreement acceptable to the District. 4. Required Exhibits, The following exhibits must accompany the permit application. One set, full size; two sets, reduced to maximum size of J f"xl7".iJ . (a) Property lines and delineation of lands under ownership of tbe appllcam. hu p:! iwww.ricecreekwd.com/ru J(~s/rc\.vd/c r Jif312006 Rule C: Storm-Water Management Pfans I Rice Creek Watershed Dislrict Page 3 of 4 . (b) Delineation of the subwatershed contributing nmoff from off. site, proposed and existing subwatersheds on.site, emergency overflows, and drainageways. . (c) Proposed and existing storrnwater facilities location, alignment and elevation. . (d) Delineation of existing on-site wetfand, marshes, shoreland and/or 1100dplain areas. . (e) Identification of existing and proposed normal, and ordinary high and I DO-year water elevations on-site. . (I) Identification of existing and proposed site contour elevations related to NGYD, 1929 datum. . (g) Constmction pfans and specifications of alf proposed storm water management facilities, including design details for oUlfet controf structures, . (h) Stormwater runoff volume and rate analyses for the one and I OO-year critical events. existing and proposed conditions. . (i) AIf hydrologic, water quality, and hydraulic computations completed to design the proposed stormwater management facilities. . (j) Narrative addressing incorporation of infiltration BMPs. . (k) Delineation of any ponding or flowage easements or other propeny interest dedicated to stormwater management purposes. 5. Platting 01' E'asement Documents. Applicant must provide platting or easement documents showing sufficient drainage and ponding/J1owage easements over hydrofogic features such as 11oodplains, storm sewers, ponds, ditches, swales, wetlands and waterways. Structures and facilities subject to flood damage buift within the 100-year flood will have two feet of freeboard between the towest 1100r and the 100-year 1100d profile. 6. Exceptions. . (a) Rufe C and its requirements will not apply to development or redevetopment of individuat sites less than 2.5 acres in size for industrial, commercial. and multi-unit residential, and less. than five a~res in size for-single-family residential, unless such development or redevelopment: o (I) Is within the 100.year 11oodpfain. o (2) Is within 1,000 feet of a public water or protected wetland. o (3) Is within 300 feet of Rice Creek, Clearwater Creek, l-lardwood Creek. or of a public ditch. . (h) Rule C and its requirements wilf not apply to construction of single.family detached dwelling on an isolated lot, unfess such dwelling: o (I) Is within the 100-year 11oodplain. o (2) Is within 1,000 feet of a public water or protectcd wetland. o (3) Is within 300 feet of Rice Creek, Clearwater Creek. Hardwood Creek, or of a public ditch. . (e) Rule C and its requirements wilf not apply to construction on individual lots within a residentiat subdivision approved by the District, unless the activity does not comply with the originat development plan or has been superseded by state law. . (d) The requirements of paragraph (f) of Section 3 will be modified for redevelopment sites at which less than fifty-percent of the total site area (including any road right.of.way) will be disturbed, such that water quality ponding will be required only for the areas being disturbed. . (e) Subdivision of land which does not propose construction of impervious surfaces or structures will be exempt from the requirements of Section 3 and paragraphs (c), tgl, (h), (i) of Section 4. H('wever, a Rule C permit is required when such future development does occur. . (f) Rate controf criteria discussed in Section 3 may be waived if the site discharges directly to a water body with farge storage capacity (such as a pubtic water) which has a lime-to-peak elevation greater than that for an on.site pond and the volume discharged from the on.site pond is negligible, relative to the volume of nmoff emering the waterbody. . (g) The requirements of paragraphs (e) and (f) of Section.1 may be waived for sites with total impervious area of less than one acre. if infiltration BMPs have been incorporated into the project to the maximum extent possible. . (h) The requirements of paragraph (j) of Section 3 may be waived for shon-duration floods not associated with regulatory (FEMA-FIS) floodpfain. Low 1100r elevations will not be allowed below the fOO-year water level, and the two-foot freeboard requirement would apply to the minimum building opening elevation. Additionally, applicant II1ust submit calcutations demonstrating the duration of the 11000 event was sufficiently hrief to prevent saturation of the soil at the low nOOf. http://www.ricecreekwd.comlnlleslrcwd/c 11/1312006 Rule C: Storlll,,\V,ltcr Management Plans I Rice Creek \Vatershcd District Page 4 of l~ . 0) In cases \vhere structures are proposed below the nlDoHt elevation of land-locked bmiins, the low-floor elevation \-\iill be ,I njinilllllm of fVlO fecl ubove the high water level as determined from an estimate of highwater levels detCJ'mined from the highest of either tbe I nO-year, tcn-day runoff event or back-tn-hack ] OO~year. 1\venty- fOllr- hour rainfalls. Aeria! photos, vcgcuilion, soils, and topography will be used to derive c. normal \vater ekv~ltion for fhe basin for purposes of computing the J OO-year elevation. ,Rule B: Permit Pro(edural Requirements up Rule D: Erosion Control Plans> printer-friendly version Rice Creek Vv'atershed District 4325 Pherlsant Ridge Drive, Suite 611 Blaine, Minnesota, 55449-4539 Phone: (763) 398-3070 I Fax: (763)398-3088 Copyright 2002-2006 About this website hi tp:lfww \V . ficccret;k wd ,com/ru leslrc welie ! j/} 31'2006 =.~~,___w~_J ~ NiJlioncll Poliut8nt Dischf'lrge Elimination System (NPDES)/St8je Disposal System (SOS) Minnesota Pollution Control Agency ,ItPClil5"iI/i1r !/J1i PLEASE SUBMIT TO: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Cons(ructjon Stormwater Permit Program 520 Lafayetle Road North, SL Paul, MN 55155.4194 01<'1'/; tI PLEASE REAO: This f0rm is for new pennit applications only. Use the TransferiModirlC<ltion form to transfer a pcrmit to OIlC party or the Subdivision Regislralion form for multiple puties. Ail f,)I'<11s arc available at the MPCA's Construction Stonnwaicr Web silc: Please refer to the application instructions tlnd the NPDES/SDS General Stormwatcr Pennil for Construction Activity (MN R 100001) as you complete this form. Brackets 'l J' refer to the StoJ1llwalcr Pe1l11il, whieh is included with this application. Cc.ll the MPC A Customer Assistance Centl'r at 651-297-2274 or 800-646-6247 (in Minnesota) for assistance. Are you r!'~.<i.)lt.o apply? I. Stormw.lter PolJulion Prevention Plan (SWprp) ,1. Hns a Stonnwatcr Pollution Prevention Pian been developed for this project and illCOlvorated into lhc project's plans (jnd specifiealiolls? [see attached General Stormwater Permit Part nLA] b. Arc erosion prevention f1lC"SlIfCS <l<ldresscd in the SWPPP? [Part IV.B} c. Arc sediment control measures addressed in the S\.VPPP? [Pmt IV.C] d. Arc dc\vatering llnd hasin draining addressed in the SWPPP? [Part IV.D] c. Arc inspcct!ons and maintenance 3d dressed in the SWPPP? (Part IV.E} r Are pollution prevention management measures addressed in the SWPPP? [Pal1IV.Fj g. Is final stabilizillion addressed in Ihe S\VPPP? lPart IV.G) h. ]f 8n environmental review was required, did you incorporate all stonnwatcr related mitigation l11C<lsurcs contained in the review into the SWPPP? DYes DNo DYes DNo DYes DNo DYes DNo DYes DNo DYes DNo DYes DNo DYes DNo DNA STOP ifYOll responded No to allY question above. A SWPPP must be developed prior to submitting <1 permit application. Complete the above requirements and check Yes before submit!ing this application. Co-ntinu€ if you responded Yes or NA, to aB questions above. 2. Discharges to Special Waters (l. Are n1l sformwnlcr discharges that may flow tTom the project to ,1 Spccial Water that is foeated DYes DNo DNA within 2,000 feet of any project discharge points addressed in the SWPPP to meet the permit conditions in Appendix A, Part A-C? STOP ifYOll responded No. Complete the ,1bove requirements and check Yes before submitting this application. Continue responded Yes. 3. Additional Application Rniew fl. Will the project include altel"nstive trcatment methods? [Pal111LC.5] Iryes, this appJic<ltion and the alternative treatment plans 1l1llSt he submitted a minimum or90 days before construction starts. b. Iryes, arc the plans attached? c. Will the projeci disiurb 50 acres? AND Is there a discharge point within 2000 ICet of an impaired or spcci81 \Vatcr \vhose discharge I1llJY reach:111 impaired or special water listed in Appendix A ofllle permit? [Part II.B.] .bJ ]f yes. this <1pplic<1tioll and the SWPPP must be submitted a minimum of 30 days before construction starts. G. If yes, is the S\VPPP 8ttachcd? DYes DNo DYes DNo DYes DNo 4, Application Fcc Is the required S400 Application Fcc (payable to lhc MPCA) enclosed? DYes DNo DYes \vq.slrm2.:i7 lofJ RCI.isctl4!1l.) Construction .l\cti1iit)! Information 5. Projert Name 6. Pro,i{'et Lon1Hon Oriel1y dCSCE'ihL' ".he'n' ,'ull"lr1idin!1 '1L"li\:iy nrnm;, - Example: Inle,stetion l>f4)lh Slre;:l ,Hl(! ;]'\-)11': !\\'C'l\le J wimh (!,Un-. \" ij'",,, ;': II,. Cil)' MN Stille> ZinC(,,:,-' Ih'! iFl;"'TS"'''I"\" ("(Hlnty An elks where <"_Hblnll'iinl1 ;vil! ,KCur !\)lloWl;ships \1'1;erc CUd~lnitl:"I1;' II< o,-elll 7. Project Size 8. Project Map 9. Project Type.> 10. Cumulath'€ Impervious Surface I). J}ermancnt Stonnwllter- Mrlllagcmcnt 12. Rerei"ing "Vaters ('nl1~tnlCI>Gn will occm Nt1ll1!J[,:-;T7H:1TS 10 be disturhtd Is the required R 1f2 x II" United States Geologic211 Survey (USGS) 7_5 rmnule quad or equivalent map indienting site boundmics Btischcd? OY,'s [] Residential Dc amme rcialllndustria I o Rmlli Consfl'llClion OOthcr a, Existing area of impervious surface _ (10 the nemest quarter acre) b. Post construction llrea of impervious surface _ 00 the nearest qHilflCf ;c;crc} II" new impervious surface created by thl' project is less than I}nf- au€. skip to question 12. What types (check all thai 8pply) ofpenn<'1rlcnl storm water mam~gen)cnt \-vii! be uscd ifmore Ihall one Hcre OfnC\N impervious surface is created by the project? [Paft HI. C1 i ! Wet Sedimentation Bnsin o Infiltration/Filtration o RcginrJal Ponding n Alternative Methods (]f\l~:ng allrl"!l;ll;\'~ m<:'lhod_~, nm~lnl<:.iol' l"1'lln;.1tl',)m'~wn('-' 1I1ltii n' ,'i,-il,,, ;lppn.v;:1 front 111;.' MPCA,) o Oiher (Specify n~ason ,)I,d lisl other ;rea(111"nl ;;i)owd by Par! iiI. C) Identify surface waters within Y; lnilc of project boundary that will rec;i~'~~-;t~;~:1 \v:'.tcr frorrl the site or discharge from penmmcnl Stonnwater management system. Include walcrs shu\,vn on USGS 7 _S minute qUZld or equivalent, all Special Waters identified in Appendix A of the permif ::indior any imp-,-1ird walers (To find Special or Impaired Waters, use the Special and Jmo<l!red Waters Search loolat ~c2,.state.mn.us/watcr!stom)w[\!er!storn1\vatcr-c.htm!). Use additional pnpcr if necessary, Name of Waler Body Type (ollie". pm"j. "'c!I'''J.I"",.;~;;::-''''1 S~~~ial Waler? r Bml'a;r<<] l ri\'\!rJ I (Stl' SI'~!';;\':;\I"!\\!3ter'? ___w~_._^~~m._"_ . Pc'IIll'! :\ipmdl' A) -r----..--".-".-~-~--" I "Lg.~es...[J~o+..[Jves ONo DYes []i\'u i DYes ONn .....T ----..l C~~~~-D~,~rD;:"O;;- ,-.---.-...---- ____J DYes [JNo ['ov... ONo 13. Dates of Construction / a, Swrt D,lle 0;:,,,, W':i-Sii!li1-57 l{l{j RCl'iscd';:()(; . This fOl"in wiil nOl be accepled if llle Owner and Contractor conl~lCl inlorm<1lion seclion~, below, arc BOTH 1101 completed flnci signed. Irllle owner i~ 8lsG the contractor. or H contractor hasn't yet be-en selected. the owner must also fill oullht: contractor inionnlllion section <lnd $ign again. Responsible Parties 14. Owner BOTH MUST SlGN Ull~i!l~SS fir Fiml N<!m~ h:d..wITa.\ ID SI:llC ri~X JD ) c:\1. Lasi Tilk [-l)l,lil T..kphlm<: li/w/lirl" Iin.'H M,liJing Addn::ss Cil)' eXI, laxl Name (Ahenl;!lc Conl.ll'l) FirSINamc [-mail Tckplwm: li.I,-h,de "I~'II"<HII'} I certify undCl pennlly urlaw that this dnClIIm:nl and nil alkchlllt'llls wert: prepared under my direelion lH supervision in aecordance with a system designed 10 <ISSLlre lhat qualified [)l'I"sonncl properly gathcr and c\';l1\1<1t.;:: the informntion submitted, Based on my inquiry of the person cr persons who manage tilis syslem, 01" the persons directly responsible for g<lthcring tbe infornliltiol1, the information is, 10 the besl oI'my knowledge <lnd belief. true, acetlwlc llne! complete, I am :1W(lfC thatlhcrc arc signiric;1I11 penallies for submilling f<llse inflmlialioll_. indllding the possibi]tty of fine Hnd imprisonmenl for knowing violations, I also certify uncler penalty of]:nv thall have read, ullderstood, [lnd accepted all terms and tondiltons of the NPDES/SDS Genernl SIOn1v.v<\ler Permil Conslnlclion Activity (MN R 100001) that ;Hlthorizes s!onnwalcr dischHrgl's associaled with Ihe CDlIstmc!iol\ site identified on this form. x AlIthol,"cllSrg'llll\lr\2" Dnlc TM, .'lpp/i,'uli(JII lIJl/,~II;,..' si:pwd lI,r,' Cl1rpo/"f/(iol/; 1/ prim'ifm! e.H'CllliI'e /Jilin'!" 'duI 1(,<1.,' the lel'el '!/,l'in'-prl'sid"lII (!I'llI<' ,hdl' rlurl/orized l"t'fJl"e,\"'lIIu!ire or age"I a/lhe ,'.H'I""Iin' oflin'l" {(IIii' /"'flh'.H'<r!o!i!~' I1r ".l~t'1<1 is n'.I/JaH-I'if>le/iil" I/w on-nlll ofil'ralir)l) ,~r/lwliwi!i!.l'IJIir; is lilt' ,mi?fecl uitlw f)(",lIil applii"Uli,m Plfrfnt'r.\hip IJr SlIfl' Prupril'llInhip: <I gen"nI! fi'WItWI" ('" Ihe fli7.ipriMm-. ,llllfli{:iprrUIY. Sfr/fl', F..'lf,'mJ",. 0"1('1" Pllbli,' /lg{'lItr: f;rim'ifllll <',n.Ollin. o!linT!!!" nll/killi: d"de,lollie';,d. 15. Contractor Business or Firm Name FL',kr;!lT,!)..l!) SI,il::Tax ID ) exL LnSI Nal11e Fir.st N,\lHe Tille E mait Tl'lephom:: (i;;dudr' UIl'" code) Addless e,ly Slale Zip e>' l<lsINnillL' NtllllL' Tdeplu)Ill.' (inellldr' "/"(',( ,-ude) I cerlify under pL'J\,lIIY of Inw Ilml this dOClIillcnt nnd nil allachmenls were prepared under my direction 01 supenrisiol1 in atcord,ltKe with a syslClll designed to assure lhal qualified personnel properly gather and {'va[uale lhe information submiltcd, R:\scd on my inquiry ortlle persoll or persom who numage this system, or the persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the informalioll is. to the best of my knowledge :lnd bdief, true, ar.:curale ;md complete, I mn aW<lrc [hM there Me signtr'Ciln! renal1ies for suhmittrng l:'llse illflmnafion, including the possibility of fine and imprisonmenl for knowing viol3tions, I also certify under penalty ofl[lw thai I have read, understood, and accepted lllllenns and conditions ofttlc NPDES/SDS General Slormwater Pennil for Cll!1slroclion A~'tivily (MN R I 0000 I) 11m! authorizes stormwa!cr disdwrges associated with the cOll;i!mction ~ite identified on lhis f()rlll. x A\ith(ll'1~~'d Dale TIii.~ _'lPlilkllfiol/ '11I1.1'/ ht'siglll'd I~I" lo!"poflrtion: 1I fJ/"ini"ipu! t..reclllin' 'dli,"'" 01 <l1/;'lIlIlht' 1,',.,.1 '!/l';n'-f/l"<,sirl"IlJ or III<' d"~I' wilhod:('d /'t'!lu,\,'111nli"(' <II' <lg,'ill "{Ih,' ('.yenllin' (jllin'I' i{/Il(' /"('!)I'<'s/'II/(l/i,.(' or "gel;! i.r I"('S[lwlsihfelili' ill" on'r"li rJpe""li,m u/rlll'/iwilil.I'llwll\ lli(' -,lIlIie"1 ,!IIIit' p<,/'/!/ill/!lplit"llioll P"rf1lefship or Sol,. l'rt>pri,./lJrs}/ip: ";o!t'II<'nd f!lIIllwr "1' IfI,- jf!"Uput'IIW MIII/idpa/jf)', Starr', Federulllf Oth('r l'lfbfi(' .{!.fl'rlq: {wil!: if)ol,' ,',le, /IIin' ol)il'(" or rUllki"!; ,)ecr,',/ ,!(1ici<lr \\,'I-);ll1n2-)'/ .\ot3 ReI ised 4/06 This Page Left Intentionally Blanl, W<1-Q!';\12-5:J Rc' i~t'd ! i/Ub Minn9S An(~\j """. '-' J !-'wfo::rCJi:'lO ivliHH{.'.~~)J.tI'F I>ruiW.l!IHl'jJ( .'.ii';t~ APPLICATION STRUCTIONS for I ESOTA'S NPDES/SDS GENERAL IT y'.:,r CONSTRUCTION A IVIT'I Submission of an application is notice that the owner line! general contractor identified on the npplicatioll intend to be authorized by an NPDES/SDS permit issued for StanTlwater discharges <'lssociated with a construction activity in lhe State of Minnesota. For Questions 1-3. please refer [0 the NPDES/SDS General Storm wafer Permit for Construction Activity and the nov./chart al the end of these instructions. lndic3te if a Stormw3tcr Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) has been prep..'1red and fhe approprinte sectIOns (n throllgh h oflhis question) hnve been addressed by answering "Yes" or "No"_ A SWPPP is a plan for SIOrmw<itel discharge that includes erosion prevention measures and sediment controls thaI, when implemented, will decrcasc $oil erosion on a parcel of!nnd and decrease pollution in receiving waters. This plan must be developed prior 10 submitting (l permit applic<ltion. A sample plan and development tools are availnble on lhe U.S. EnvironmenhlJ Protection Agency web page al h.Lm~ilf:jl'!.lL~J.,:"~12il,RQ"~:1!lD.~1!~5ji!'-Qnl}'~'!:D.L(;L'_~_~y~~pS.Sri;l For section "h" indicate if an Environmental Review has been completed ifrequired, by answering "Yes" or "No" or "NA", Environmental review looks at how a proposed project could potentiaHy affect the t::nvrronment ,md fook~ at ways to avoid or minimize impacts before the project is permitted and builL Examples of cntegoric~ th<ll mny need an environmental review include residential development; indllstri<ll, commerci<ll, and ins.ti!lllioni.;l facililie$; and ,:Iso highway projects, For cCI1ain projects. environmcntd review is mandatory. For more details ~ee Ihe Gllide I() lV!;/1l1eso!a Enl'imnme-l1laf R(?vieH' Rilles, Chapter 6. This cnn be found at 2, lndiclltc if discharges to special waters have been identilled <Iud addressed by answering "Yes" or "'No" or "NA" (not applicable) on the Permit Application. The questions at the right can help in making Ibis determination. Special Waters 2.a. Do you have a 'special water' that is within 2,000 feet of the project? (.s'ee Appendix A olthe Permit fix ([ list o/these s-pecioi water c()fegories) Special waters have qualities that Warnllll exlr<l protection. A list of these special welter categories can be- found in Appendix A of the permit. For information on special wGters nenrthe project's <lrea, see the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Web page at 2.b, Do YOll have SlOrmw(ller discharges that arc within 2,000 feet oftbcsc special waters? 2.c. Will the discharges identifjed jlJ 2.b. flow to the special waters? WlJ....:lnlI1-5!1 R\'';I$cd) )/06 3, Indicatc by answering "Y"5" or "No" whether the project will include altcnmlh.'(' fflrthoil3 for Ihe perm,ment Stonmvaler manageJll~nt syst~m or wiH di:;turb 50 aeres Dr more and have a discharge point (including "hcet flO'.v) th,]! i~ within 2000 feet orand flows to ,In impaired or special w,ller. Additional review from the MPCA is nXJitrrcd in thtse GISCS. You h<1vc the option ofpropGsing an allernative, innOVcl!ive, permanent Storrnwnicr manr,gCll1Cnl system. 'lOll muSl send in the permit application ::md the additional required information (see Part IILCS oflhe Permic) allcasl 90 days prior to the st.))"t of construct ton if you choose this approach. You mllst receive ,m (lpprovallctfcr from ihc i,>1P(' 1\ for this method before beginning COllstruction. The- application illlU S\VPPP need to be slIbmillcd 10 the MPCA a minimum of}(l clays pnor t() (be sInn of construc/iOll If the project dis1tlrbs 50 acres or more and c1n1ins to an impaired waler or a SPCCiBI "vater Iistcd in Appl.'ndi;, /\ of the permiL For Cilist and maps of impaired walers in MN go to _~'L\y-"~DC';LSI<lk-lmql.'Uy:'lt'Li.!:LJ.UiliIJ 4. The applicatiun requires ...5400 application fee. Indicate th31 the application fee IHlS been wclosed by answering "Yes'; Please make checks payab!c 10: IVlinnesotll Pollution Control Agency and submi! the check \vith !he completed application to: MPCr\, Regional Environmental Management Division, 520 Lafayelle Road North, SL Pnul. MN 55l55- 4194. Applications received without the required fee will be returned to the sender. 5. Lislthe construction project's name. If the project does not have a name, list the type of project and a brief desrriptioll (for example, "1-35EII-494 Interchange" or "Highway I 69 bridge replacement (#79605) al the Rum River"). 6. Provide an address (ifavnilable) and brief description of the construction aclivity's location (for exam pIt', "North West Corner of the Intersection of 45,1\ Street and Irving Avenue, Minneapolis, MN"). List lho:: County Parcel ID# for the project if it is known. If there are multiple numbers within the project, att[lch a l~sl. Parcel Identificatioll Numbers are unique numbers assigned by the County. Listing the County Parcel JD# is not required if not available (for example, highway projects) Provide the names ofal! cities, countres, and townships the construction activity 1<l),CS place in (for c.xnmple, a roadway may cross county, cify, or township boundaries). 7. Lisl. in acres, the nmount of area to be- disturbed for this project. R. Attach the reC]uircd ml:lp and indicate fhal it is included with the permit application. United States Geological Survey (USGS) 7.S-minute quad maps or equivalent maps may be llsed. USGS !.5-minute quad maps may be ordered at 11!:;Y!.s.lo'-e,llss:u~:_!Xi 9. Jndic,ne the type ofcunstrllclioll ,-:ctivity by checking the appropriate bm. Please describe the projecl ifYOll check "Other". ~O" Indicate 10 the nearest quarter acre. the existing and resulting areas of impervious surf~lces. Impervious surface means n constructed hard sud~\Ce that either prevents or retards the entry of water into the $oil and cause5 warer to rUll off rhe surface in greater quantities and at an increased rate of flow than prior to development. Examples include rooftops, sidewalks, patios, drivewHYs, pnrking lots, slorage areas, ami concrete, asphah, or gmvel l"OClcJS. (a.) "Existing" area means the arei1 of imperviolls surf3ce fhnl is present prior to the slarl of this construction project. (b.) "Post construction" menDS the entire area of impervious surface after construction is completed. Subtract (a.) from fb.} to determine the area of new impervious surface. 1 L For projecls crenting one or morc .1eres of cumulative new impervious surfaces. eht'l:k the llpproprhltf' bo~, to indicate which type(s) of permanent Stormwllter m:magt'Jncnt practices thai will be used. The "Other" box is limiied to those situations (such as proximity 10 bedrock) that are described in Parllll.C of the permit. See the permil for a further de~cription. If the "Other' box is checked, describe which situation outlined in Pan Ill. C. fits the projecl 8nd wh<ll olher permanent treCitmenr (such as grassed s'.\'ales, smailer ponds and/or grit chamber:;;) will be used on the project. w(j".<arm1-5;;; Rel'i.'ic'u J i.rU6 12. BRIEFLY describe which 'Y2terbody(s) '.vill receive StormW<ller runoff trom the construction site or from the discharge from permanent SIOnllWH!Cr man8gement systems by completing tht' table. To dctermine which \vatcrbody(s) '"'fili receive StonllWi1ter rllnofr dischtlrgcs, :nakc:1 brief smvey of lhe project's surrounding area, Include [he Wl1ters identifier! on a USGS -iSminute quad or eqlllvidcnt m<1p. See Appendix A orlhis permit 10 determine if<1 w<llubody is <l spCCt<1J waler, To find specilll or impaired waters. use the at: ~'c:'.':~'::.J'C;L \L:jLCJJ]if ~,!.?L~\:sHtL>~\ ,L ;~:::Jh,l.::':~~!l_~i::'{'lh:' H: _'; t iJJj. 13 Lisi lhe start and estimated l'ompletion dates or tile construction project (for e-xample, 9i1S/05), 1 ~1> Owner Information: Provid[' the infonnation requested oCthe owner of thc company, organizRtion, or other enlity for \vhich this construcLion project IS being done. The Own(>f meHns.thc person or pal1y possessing the liile ortbe land 011 which the construe I ion nctivilies will occur; or if the construclion Bctivity is for a ICflse holder, the p<1ny or individual identified as the lease holder: or the contracting government agency responsible for the construction activity. The owner is the p3rt}' responsible h)r the compliance with all terms and conditions of the permit. The aHernate contact should be the owner'::; representatiw in cn'lrge of the project (for example, Sandy Smith, InsfJcctm: Joe .Johnson, Project Manager; elc). AflerCOOlpleling this applicalion, certi(y it with a signature and dale from an individmll authorized 10 sign the npplicalion. This appllcatiOll Curm must be signed by either <1 principal executive officer, vice preside-nt, reprcsent<lt!ve agent responsible for overall operations, general partner, or a propricloL ffthe activity is being conducted by ,1 unit of govermnen! tstate, county, municipality, or township), thIS application !THlst be signed by a principal executive officer or nmking elected officiallfor c-x3mple, city Dr county engineer, administrator, or mansger; direcior of public works; lllayor, etc.} For additional information, see Minnesota Rules 7001,0060. IS, Contractor (Operntor) Information: Provide the informaflon requested orfhe contractor. The Clmtractor means the party \.vho signs tbe construction contract with the owner to eOllstnlctlhe project described in the final plans and specificatiolls. Where the construction project involves more tlwll one contractor, the gener<ll contractor will be the party responsible for J1l[lIl<1ging fbe projecf on behalf of !Ile owner. In some cases the owner may be the genera! contractOL 1n these cases, the owner mil)' contract [In individuall1s the operator who would be the co-pclmittec. The operator (usually the genernl contractor) is jointly responsible with the owner for compliance with part 11.8., part II.C., and part IV of the permit. After this appliudion has been completed by the owner, the contractor must certify it v....jth ,1 signature and date- from ,1Il individual <lulhorized to sign the fonn. The <lpplicRtion mmt be signed by either a principal executive officer, vice presidenl, represenf<-ltive ilgem responsible for overall operations, general partner, or a proprietor. lfthe general contrnctor is a unit of government (Slate, county, municipality, or township), this application must be signed by a principal executive ortiecr, ranking elected otTicial, administrator, manager, coorclinaior, or engineer. (For additional infornwtioll, see Minnesota Rules 7001 ,(l060,) The alternate co-ntact should be the contn1ctor's representative in charge of the project (for example, SCOll t'v1arshall. Head Foreman: Ann Johnson, Project Manager, etc.), Send [he C'omplered app{;calion andj~'e 10: I\1PCA Rrgion31 Environmental Management Division 520 Lafayette Road North Sf. Paul, I\1N 55155-4194 QlIesiions? Conrad thf' lvlPCA Customer Assistance Center al (800) 646-6247 or (65!) 297-2274. Fa; h!lsinesses Ij'ith/ell'C!F (hem I GO emplo,l'ees, con/net (he iviPCA Small Bwim'ss AssistancE' Program af (8DO) 657-3938. W<I-S!lm2-5B Rc\'i~cd Jli06 1 I --. Owner develops a Storm-water Pollution f . projects final I [ i I .- I i i .,'t._...., Includes identifying a Includes determining if Environm~ . t] II I ... , there; authorit appr( [ t II _._____J L .. ; l/) ~/ ~~==-~- , . Submit plan Authority fo Applicants still need to seek approval through required permitting process at the local, state, and federal levels. \.'J{!'5trrrl-S8 R"i,rd ] 'ioHas th( Autt Page J of 26 Permit No: MN RJOOOOI GENERAL PERMIT AUTHORIZA TlON TO DISCHARGE STORM WATER ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY LINDER THE NA T10NAL POLLUTANT mSCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM/STATE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT PROGRA.M ISSllANCE DATE: . August I, 2003 EXPIRATION DATE: August 1,2008 In compliance with the provisions of the Clean \}.,.f.1tcr ACT. us amended., (33 U.S.C, 1251 el seq.; hereinafter, the "Act"), 40 CPR 122, 123, and 124, as amended. ct scg.; Minn. SWL Chs. 115 and 116, as amended, and Minn. R. Ch. 7001: This permit regulates the discharges of storm water to the waters of the state of Minnesota associated with construction activity. This permit covers the storm water discharges identified in Part I.A. orthis permit. The limitations on permit coverage are identified in Part lB. of this permit. This penn it requires the development and implementation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). No person shall commence construction activity covered by Part l.A. until pennit coverage under this pennit is effective or, if applicable, until the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) has issued an individuall\1'DES/SDS construction storm water permit for the project. The SWPPP must be completed prior to submitting any pennit application and prior to conducting any construction activity by any required Permittee. Untess notified by the MPCA to the contrary, applicants who snbmit a completed application (including permit fee) in accordance with the requirements of this permit are authorized to discharge storm water from construction sites under the terms and conditions of this permit 7. 30, or 90 days after the postmarked date of the completed application as described in Part ILB. ('U\'t!",lgl' llnd('r thl" pcrmll \\ill n:Jll~l1n in errr:;.;\ UI1Il[ the owner has SUhlllilh:.'d a J\;utiCl' of Termination. ~~:,:~:~::;S""'P1TU".'}IlJ~ _71 ~ i5~~1 ilMiv r~f7-' 1'vlmnesota PollutIOn (OOlfO] Agenq If you have questions on this permit, including the specific permit requirements, pennit reponing or pemlit compliance status, please contact the appropriate MPCA offices. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Construction Storm 'Vater Program 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155-4194 Telephone (651) 297-2274 wq.wm2-51 Ai! boidjtU'f!d lforms an' drfln,.'d in "Defmiliolls, .. Pages 13 fhrough 26 TDD fj;)r heiJring and speech impaired <JlIly): !651j28J-5332 ;'vJ(lJ(' fn.)m over 50% re(l'dedjibe-r including 20% POS! COflS/OJI('r WOSIi.' Page 2 of 26 Pcrrni1 No; j\'~N RlOOOOI T.lblr iOf Contt'iaIS Page I. PERMIT COVERAGE AND LIMIT ATtONS....".................................",........................ 3 A. Permit Coverage......................................... ................................................................. 3 B. Limitations ofCoveragc_............................. ...............................,....................... 3 II. SUBMITTING THE APPLICA TION ..............................m............................................."<I A. Prerequisite for Submitting a Permit AppJication ........................................................ 4 B. Application and Duration of Coverage......................................................................... 4 C. Termination of Coverage..... ........... ........................................................ ...................... 6 m. STORM W A 'fER DlSCHARGE DESIGN REQUiREMENTS.....................................; 7 A. Storm Water Pollution Prevention PJan .......................................................................7 B. Temporary Sediment Basins ........................................................................................ 9 C. Permanent Storm Water Management System........................................................... 10 D. Record Retention ........................................................................................................ 13 IV. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVlTY REQUIREMENTS ...................................................... 13 A. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ........ ............................................................ ] 3 B. Erosion Prevention Practices'"'h''' .............. ..............................................__...___.....h 13 C. Sediment Control Practices '"'''' ............... ................................................................ J4 D. Dewatering and Basin Draining... ............... ............................................................. 15 E. Inspections and Maintenance ..................................................................................... ]5 F. Pollution Prevention Management Measures....... .............................____.17 G. Final Stabilization.................................... ....................................................... 17 V. GENERAL PROVISIONS ,..........................................................,....................................III A. Appticability Criteria................. .......................................................... ]8 B. Response.............................. ...... ............. .................... .................................... 18 C. Prohibitions ............................... ................ ............. .....................................18 D. Transfer of Ownership or Control.... ......................................_... 18 E. Civil and Criminal Liability... .....................................................18 f. Severability.........,............................................. ...................................... 19 G. NPDES/SDS Rule Standard Conditions.. ..................... .................... ........ 19 H. Inspection and Entry.................................... ............. ...............................19 APPENDIX A ...............,........................................,...................................................................... 19 APPENDIX B . DEFINITIONS ................................................................."".."....."................. 23 wq-strm2-51 Page 3 of 26 Permit No: MN RIOOOOI PART l. PERMIT COVERAGE AND LIMITATIONS A. PERJ,flT COVERAGE J. This pennit is required for storm water discharges associated with construction acti\'it): and with sma!! construction activity us defined in 40 c.r.R. part I 22.26(b)( 14)(x) and (hli 15). respectively. 2. This pennit authorizes, subject to the terms and conditions of this pcrmiL the dischargl' nf storm w~ltcr associated with construction activity and small construction activity. Construction activity includes. dearing, grading and excavation. that disturbs land of equal to 01 greatenhan five (5) acres and includes the disturbance of less than fiv.; (5) acres ofwtalland arca that is a part ofa larger common plan of development or sale if the larger common plan will ultimately disturb five (5) acres or more. Small construction activity includes clearing, grading and excavation, that disturbs land of equal to or greater than one (1) acre, and includes the disturbance of less than one ( I) acre 0 r tetalland area that is part of a larger common plan of development or sale if the larger common plan wil! ultimately disturb equal to or greater than one and less than five (5) acres. Small construction activity does not include routine maintenance that is performed to maintain the origin;)) linl' LInd grade, hydraulie capacity, or original purpose of the facility. 3. This permit covers all areas of the state of Minnesota. 4. For Parts I.B through Appendix A of this pennit, all reference to construction activity includes both small construction activity and construction activity. B. LIMIT A nONS OF COVERAGE This pennit does not cover the following aClivities: I. Discharges or releases that are not storm water' except those non-storm water discharges authorized under Part IV.D. 2. The placement offill into waters of the state requiring local, stale, or federal authorizations (such as U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 permits. Department of Natura! Resources Public Waters Work Permits or Local Governmen.tal Unit Wetland Conservation At.:t r('placement plans or determinations). 3. Storm water discharges associated with industrial activity that originate from lh~ sile after construction activities have been compleled and the site has undergone final stabilization. POSI- construction industrial storm \Vater discharges may need to be covered by a separate NPDES/SDS permit. 4. Non-point source agricultural and silvicultural discharges excluded from NPDES permit requirements nnder 40 crR part 122.3(e). 5. Discharges to the waters identified below unless the requirements of Appendix A Jre complied with: wq-strm2-S! Page 4 of 26 Permit ]'..Jo: tAN R 10000 I a. Discharges into outstanding resource value \-vaters ((}RV\Vs) 85 defined HI Minn. R 7050.0180, subp. 3 and 6, excepi calcarcOlls fens listed in i\'1inn. R. 7050.0 18D, sobp. 6.b. b. Discharges into Trout waters as listed in MInn. R. 6264.0050, sllbp. 2 i.mG 4. c. Discharges into Wellands as listed in Minn. R. 7050.0130, ilcm. r. d. Discharges from projects that have not met applicable Envin.mrnental Rc\'iev.' requirements under state or federal laws. c. Discharges that adversely impact or contribute to adver.se impacts on a listed endangered or threatened species or adversely modify a designated critical habitai.. f, Discharges which adversely affect properties listed Of eligible for llsting in the National Register of Historic Places or affecting known or discovered archeological sites. 6. Discharges to calcareous fens listed in Minn. R. 7050.0 180, ,ubp. 6.b. 7. Discharges to waters for which there is a total maximum daily load (TMDL) a!Iocation for sediment and parameters associated with sediment transport are not eligible for coverage under this permit unless the Permittee(s) develop and certify a SWPPP that is consistent with the assumptions, allocations and requirements in the approved TMDL To be eligible for coverage under this general permit, Permittee(s) must incorporate into their SWPPP any conditions applicable to their discharges necessary tor consistency with the assumptions, allocations and requirements of the TMDL within any timeframes estabhshed in the TI'.1DL. The SWPPP must include the provisions in Part 1II.A.? If a specific numeric wasleloao aliocation has been established that would apply to the project's discharges, the Permittee(s) must lnl'orporate that allocation into its SWPPP and implement necessary steps to meet that allocation. PART II. SUBMITTING THE APPLICATION A. PREREQ]"JtSITE FOR SUBMITTING A PER.,'AIT APPLICATiON The owner must develop 3 Storm \Vater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) in accordance with Part III (Storm Water Discharge Design Requirements) of [his permit. The plans me not to be submitted to the MPCA (unless the project size is 50 acres or more and will discharge to certain waters as described in Part n.B.1.b.) but are to be retained by the owner in accordance with Part lILD (Record Retention). The applicants' failure to complete the S""PPP prior to sllbmil1ing the application will result in the application being returned and the storm water discharges associated with construction acth'ity will not be authorized by this permit. B. APPLlCA nON AND DURA nON OF COVERAGE ] . Application Required. a. The owner and operator shall submit a completed application form (or a photocopy thereof) with the appropriate fee for project sIZe (see application foml) 10 the MPCA for each project which disturbs one (I) or more acres of land. The owner and openltor of fl fommon plan wq-slrrn2-51 Page 5 of 26 Pemlit No: MN R I 0000 I of development or sale that will ultimately disnlrb one (I) or more acres must submit a completed application to the MPCA. b. For certain projects or common plans of development or sale disturbing 50 acres or more, the application must be submitted at least 30 days before the start of construction activity. This requirement pertains to projects that have a discharge point on the project that is within 2000 feet of, and flows to, a speciat water listed in Appendix A, Part B. or waters listed as impaired under section 303(d) of the federal Clean Water Act (see MPCA's web site). Applicants must submit a completed application form and Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan including all calculations for the Permanent Stornl \Vater Management System (see Part IIt.A - C), 2. The Owner and Operator are Permittee(s). The owner who signs the application is a Permittee and is responsible for compliance with all tenns and conditions of this pennit. The operator (usually the general contractor) who signs the application is a Permittee for Parts IJ.B., Part H.C. and Part IV. of this permit and is jointly responsible with the owner for compliance with those portions of the permit. 3. Pemlit Coverage. The comrnencement of any construction activity (e.g., land disturbing activities) covered under Part LA. of this permit is prohibited until pemlit coverage under this pemlit is effective or, if applicable, until the MPCA has issued an individual NPDES/SDS construction storm water permit for the project. a. Except as provided in subp. 3.b. and 3.c. below, pennit coverage will become effective ~.Y..~ (7) days after the poslmarked date of the completed application form. b. For projects disturbing 50 acres or more, that have a discharge point on the project that is within 2000 feet of, and flows to, a special water listed in Appendix A. Part B. or waters listed as impaired under section 303(d) of the federal Clean Water Act, the applicants must submit a completed application and SWPPP to the MPCA at least thirty (30) days prior to the commencement of construction activities. MPCA staffwil! review the S\VPPP submitted with the completed application and unless the Permittee is notified in writing that the SWPPP docs not meet the general permit requirements, permil coverage will become effective 30 days after the postmarked date or MPCA date-stamp (whichever is first) of the completed application. c. For proposals to use Alternative Method(s) for the Permanent Storm Water Management System under Part IILC.5, the applicants must submit a completed application and SWPPP, including the Alternative Method documentation under Part III.C.5, to MPCA for review and approval at least 90 days prior to the proposed starting date of construction activity. 1. The MPCA will notify the applicant within the 90-day period, in writing, whether the alternative method is approved or not approved and. if applicable, the basis for denial. II. The applicant may re-submit the alternative method after addressing the MPCA's basis for denial. The MPCA will respond within 30 days. Ill. Permit coverage will become effective upon receipt of an alternative treatment method approval letter from MPCA. Any construction activity on the project is not covered under this permit until receiving the alternative treatment approval letter. wq-slrm2-51 llnge 60f26 Permil No: MN R 100001 4. Coverage Letler. For projects under subpart 3.n. Oflhis part, the Perrnitlu(s) will receive a permit letler and certificate acknowledging pemlit coverage, tlsuuHy \.Ylthin 3D days of the postmarked date of the compteted application. 5. Change of Coverage. For storm water discharges from constmction projects where the owner or operator changes, (e.g., an original developer selis portions of the property to various homebuilders) the new owner or operator must submil a subdivision registration within 7 days of assuming operational control of the site, commencing work on their portion of the site, or of the legal transfer, sale or clos.ing on the property. For instances where ill} m'l'n~r or operator of an entire project changes after an application has been submitted under Part II, the new (tll'ner or operator must submit an application for permit transfer/modification within 7 duys of assuming control of the site or commencing work on-site, or of the legal transfer, sale or dosing on the property. Late submittals will not be rejeeted; however, the MPCA reserves the right 10 take enforcement for any unpeffilitted discharges or permit noncompHance for the new registered part)' that has assumed control ofthe site. For storm water discharges from cOJlstmction activities where the owner or operator changes, the new owner or operator can implement the original SWPPP created for the project or develop and implement their own SWPPP. Permitlee(s) shall ensure either directly or through coordination with other Permitteels) that their SWPPP meets all terms and conditions of this permit and that their activities do not render another party's erosion prevention and sediment control Best Management Practices (BMPs)." C. TERMINATION OF COVERAGE I, Permittee(s) wishing to terminate coverage under this pemlit must submit a Notice of Termination (NOT) to the MPCA. Compliance with this permit is required until a NOT is submitted, The Permittee(s) authorization to discharge under this permit terminates at midnight of the day the NOT is signed. 2. All Permittee(s) must submit a NOT within thirty (30) days after one or more ofthe following conditions have been met: a. Final stabilization (see Part IV.G. and definition in Appendix B) has been achieved on all portions of the site for which the Permittee is responsible (including the removal of all temporary measures such as silt fence, and if applicable. returning agricultural land to its pre- construction agricultural use); b. Another owner/operator (Permittee) has assumed control according to Part H.B.5 over all areas of the site that have not been finally stabilized; or c. For residential construction only, temporary erosion protection and down gradient perimeter control for individllallots has been completed and the residence has been transferred to the homeowner. Additionally, the Permittee must distribute the lVWCA's <<homeowner factsheet" to the homeowner to inform the homeowner of the need for, and benefits of, final stabilization. 3. Permittee(s) that use an altemative method for the permanent storm \''Vater management system as described in Part Ute.5, are prohibited from terminating this permit tmtiJ fin~1 stabilization has been achieved on site and either: wq-.o;;trm1-51 Page 7 of26 Permit No: MN klOOOOJ a} The t\vo years of monitoring data has been submitted to the MPCA and the MPCA has determined lhat the required treatment has been achieved. The Permittee v-o'ill be notified in writing within 30 days after the monitoring data has been submitted. If the Perminee has not heard fTOm the MPCA within 30 days after submitting the required data, the Permittee can submit a Notice of Termination. b} The Permittee can submit a Notice of Termination, even if the limcframe is less than two years, if the MPCA determines that the alternative method is achieving the required treatment. During the- monitoring and evaluation of the alternative method, the Permittee is not responsible for other permit requirements that have been transferred as described in PanILB.5. PART III. STORM WATER D1SCH.>\RGE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS A. STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN The owner must develop a Storm Water PotIution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The SWPPP shaH be completed prior to submitting any permit application and prior to conducting any construction activity by any required Permittee(s). The plan must be a combination of narrative, plan sheets and if appropriate standard detail sheets that address the foreseeable conditions. at any stage in the constmction or post construction activities. The plan must include a description of the nature of the construction activity. The plan must address the potential for discharge of sediment and/or other potential pollutants from the site. For storm water discharges from construction activities where the owner or operator changes, the new owner or operator can implement the original S\VPPP created for the project or develop and implement their own SWPPP. Permittee{s) shaH ensure either directly or through coordination with other PermiUee(s) that their SWPPP meets all tcmlS and conditions of this pennit and that their activities do not render another party's erosion prevention and sediment control Best Management Practices (BMPs) ineffective. 1. As part of the S\VPPP the owner must identify <I person knowledgeable and experienced in the application of erosion prevention and sediment control RMPs who will oversee the implementation of the S\VPPP, and the installation, inspection and maintenance of the erosion pre,,'cntion and sediment control BMPs before and during construction. The owner must identifY who will have the responsibility for long term operation and maintenance of the permanent storm water management system (see Part 1l1.C). The owner shaU develop a chain of responsibility with ail operators on the site to ensure that the S\VPPP will be implemented and stay in effect until the construction project is complete, the entire site has undergone final stabilization, and a NOT has been submitted to the MPCA. 2. The S\VPPP must incorporate the requirements of Part III (Stann \Vatcr Discharge Design Requirements), Part IV (Construction Activity Requirements) and Appendix A for the project. A narrative describing the timing for installation of all erosion prevention and sediment control BJ\;IPs required in Part Ill, Part IV and Appendix A must also be included in the plan. 3, The SWPPP requirements must he incorporated into the project's tinal plans and specifications andior project documentation, as appropriate, and must include: a. Location and type of all temporary and permanent erosion prevention and sediment control Rl\lPs along with procedures to be used to establish additional temporary RI\1Ps as necessary wq-strm2-51 P~lg~ ~ or 26 P~rmilNu:;\:~N R iODOOJ for the site conditions during cOflslruCi:ion. StamJ3:ftl pja~{'s andiof specifications fori:h<:: B\lPs used on the project must be included in the final plans and specificalions fur the project b. A site map with existing and final grades, including (/ivj(!ing lines and -diret'tion of flow [0; all pre and post-construction storm water mooff drainage areas located \vithin fhi: project limits. TIle site map must also include jmpervious surf~H.'es am! soil types. c. Locations of areas not to be disturbed. d. Location of areas where constmction will be phased to minimize duration of expos.:'J Sl)l] areas. e. AU surface waters and existing wetlands. which can be identified on maps such as United States Geological Survey 7.5 minute quadrangle maps or equivalent maps within om>half mile from the project boundaries, which will receive storm water nmoff from th..: construction site, during or after construction. \Vhere surface waters receiving nmoff associated with construction activity will not fit on the plan sheet, they must be ldenrilieu with an arrow, indicating both direction and distance to the surface- water, '1: Methods to be used lor final stabilizalion of all exposed soil areas, 4. The Permittee(s) must amend the SWPPP as necessary to include additional requirements, slIch as additional or modified BMPs, designed to correct problems idemified Dr address siwmjons whenever: a. There is a change in design, construction, opermion, maintenance, weather or season31 conditions that has n signil1cant effect on the disl'hargc of polluumts 10 5nrfa\'t' ,.)'.:ilters OJ underground waters; b. Inspections or investigations by site operators. local. stat\? OJ fcdewl officials indi('~ltc the SWPPP is not effective in eliminating or significmnly minimi7in,g the dischmgt? of po!Julants to surface waters or undergrountl waters or tha! the discharges are i.~allsjng \-yater quality standard exceedances; or c. The S'VPPP is not achieving the general objectives of controlling pollutants in storm )nlter discharges associated with construction acth'it.y, or the S'VPPP i$ not consistent with the tenns and conditions of this permit. d. At any time after pemlit coverage is effective, the \'1 PC .A. may determine that the project's storm water discharges may cause, have reason3ble potential10 cause, or contribute to non-attainment of any ~ppJjrable water quality standard. or that Ihe SWPPP does not incorporate the requirements in Part Hl.A.7 related to an approved Total Maximmn Daily Load (TMDL) implementation plan thnll:onrams construction storm water related requirements. IfMPCA makes such detenmnation{s} or any of the determinations in Parts lILA.4.a..4.c, MPCl\ '.vilJ notify the PfrmiUet's in writing. In response. the Permittees musl develop a supplemental B!V1P action pl.;:m or appropriate S\VPPP amendments describing SWPPP rnodi!ic()!lons 10 address thl,;' identified concerns and submit information reqllested by l\:lPCA. \vhich may lnriude wq,:;tnn2.51 Page 9 of 26 Pennit No: MN RIOOOOI an individual permit application. IfMPCA's wrinen notification requires a response. failure to respond within the specified timefrarne constitutes a permit violation. 5. The S\VPPP must factor in any findings of and include any storm water mitigation measures required as the resuh of any environmental, archeological or other required locaL state or federal review conducted for the project. For the purposes of this permit provision, mitigation measures mean avoiding, minimizing, rectifying (e.g., repairing, rehabilitating. restoring), reducing, eliminating or conlpensating for impacts related to: (I) storm water discharges associated with the project's construction activit)'; and (2) erosion prevention, sediment control and the permanent storm water management system for the project. 6. The S\VPPP must provide additional measures as necessary to assure compliance with surface and ground water standards in Minn. R. chapters 7050 and 7060 in karst areas and to ensure protection of drinking water supply management areas (see Minn. R. 4725.4450). 7. lfnmofffrom the site discharges to an impaired water which has an approved TMDL implementation plan containing requirements for construction storm water discharges, the Permittee must include the following in the S\VPPP: a. idemify the receiving water and the areas of the site disc-harging to it; and b. BMPs that are appropriate for the site and sufficient to comply with all applicable requirements of the TMDL implementation plan. B. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS 'Where ten (l0) or more acres of disturbed soil drain to a common location, a temporary (or pennancnt) sediment basin must be provided prior to the runoifJeaving the construction site or entering surface \-Vaters. The Permittee is encouraged, but not required, to install temporary sediment basins where appropriate in areas with steep slopes or highly erodible soils even jfless than ten (l0) acres drains to one area. The basins must be designed and constructed according to the following requirements: I. The basins mllst provide storage below the outlet pipe for a calculated volume of runoff from a 2 year, 24 hour storm from each acre drained to the basin, except that in no case shaH the basin provide less than J 800 cubic feet of storage below lhe outlet pipe from each acre drained to the basin. 2. \\'hcrc no such calculation has been pcrfonncd. a temporary (or pennanent) sediment basin providing 3,600 cubic feet of storage below the outlet pipe per acre drained to the basin, shall be provided where attainable until tinal stabilization of the site. 3. Temporary basin outlets must be designed to prevent short-circuiting and the discharge of floating debris. The basin must be designed with the ability to allow complete basin drawdown (e.g.. perforated riser pipe wrapped with filter fabric and covered with crushed gravel, pumps or other means, see Part IV.D.) for maintenance activities, and provide a stabilized emergency overflow to prevent failure of pond integrity. Energy dissipation must be provided for the basin outlet (see Part IV.BA). wq~stm1:;:.5) Page 10 of26 Pt:ml~t ND:i'vn'\~ RlOOOOl 4. The temporary (Of permanent) basins must be fon:;1:mc1:cd and made opermionai (,OIlCHrfent with the start of soil disturbance that is llpgradient of the' area and contriollles nlnof{ 10 the pond. 5. \Vhere the temporary sediment b!lsin is not attninabJe due to sile limiwtions. equivalent s:cdanHmt controls such as smaller sediment basins, and/or sediment traps, silt tences, vegetative buffer strips, or any appropriate combination of measures are required for all down slope boundaries of the construction area and for those side slope boundaries deemed :appropriate as dictaled by individual site cOTlditions. In detennining whether inS"l<:lHing a sediment basin is Dtt8inable, the Permittee must crmsider public safety and may consider factors siJch as site soils, slope, and available area on site. This determination must be documented in the S\VPJPP. C. PERMANENT STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM All storm water must be discharged in a manner that docs nol cause nuisance conditions? erosion In receiving channels or on downslope properties, or inundation in wcthmds causing a signifIcant adverse impact to the wetlands. \:Vhere a project's ultimate development replaces vegetatIon andJor other perviolls surfaces with one or more acres of cumulative impervious surface, a water quality volume of Y; Inch of rllnoff from the new impervious surfaces created by the project mllst be treated by one of the methods outlined in Part IIl.C.1 through Part UtCS prior to the mnoJT leaving the constmction site or entering surface waters (excluding drainage systems that convey storm water to a constmcted permanent storm water management. facility designed to treat the water quality volume from the project). For those areas of (l project where there is no feasible way to meet the treatment requirement for the water quality volume, other treatrnenl such as grassed swales, smaller ponds or grit chambers is required prior to discharge to surface waters. A cumulative maximum of(3) three acres or 1% of project size whichever is larger can be treated in this manner. \Vhere the proximity to bedrock preclude~ the installation of any of tile permanent storm nater management practices outlined in Part fH.C., other treatment, slIch as grassed swales, smaller ponds, or grit chambers, is required prior to discharge to surface waters. For work on road projects where the-lack of right of way precludes the jnsta!lation of an)' of the permanent storm water management practices outlined in Part Ute., other treatment such as grassed s\vales, smaller ponds, or grit chambers, is required prior to discharge lo surfm:;p \-vaters. ] . Wet Sedimentation Basin a. The basin musl have a permanent volume of 1800 cubic feel.of stowge below the omlet pipe for each acre th,at drains to the basin. The basin's permanent volume mtlst reach a minimum depth of at leasl 3 feet and must have no depth greater than J 0 feet. The basin rOllst he configured such that scour or re-suspension of solids is minimized. b, The basin's \'nlter quality volume is calculated as ~/2 inch of nmoff from the new impenriolls surfaces created by the project. c. Basin outlets shall be designed such that the lVnter qml~ity 't'oiumt' is discharged at no more than 5.66 cubic feet per second (cf&) per acre of surface area oflhe pond. wq-;;rml?Sl Page I J of26 Pennit No: MN RIODOOI d. Basin outlets must be designed to prevent sh0!1-circuiting and the discharge of floating debris. Basin outlets must have energy dissipation. e. The basin must provide a stabilized emergency overflow to accommodate storm events in excess of the basin's hydraulic design. f Adequate maintenance access must be provided (typically 8 ft. wide) for future maintenance ofrhe basin. 2. InfIltration/Filtration Infiltration/Filtration options include but are not limited to~ infiltration basins, infiltration trenches, rainwater gardens, sand filters, organic filters, biaretention areas, enhanced swales~ dry storage ponds with undcrdrain discharge, off-line retention areas and natural depressions. Infiltration must be used only as appropriate to the site and land uses. Settleabte solids, floating materials, oils and grease should be removed from the runoff to the maximum extent practicable before runoff enters the infiltrationlfiltration system. Filtration systems must have a reasonable chance of achieving approximately 80% removal of tot a] suspended solids. The Permittee(s) must evaluate the impact of constructing an infiltration practice on existing hydrologic features (e.g., existing wetlands) and try to maintain pre-existing conditions (e.g., do not breach a perched water table which is supporting a wetland). For a discussion of ground water warnings. design measures, maintenance considerations or other retention, detention. and treatment devices, see the MPCA'. Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas found on the MPCA's web-site. a. Infiltration systems should not be excavated to tinal grade until the contributing drainage area has been constructed and fully stabilized. b. During constmctlon of an infiltration system, rigorous sediment and erosion controls (e.g.) diversion berms) should be used to keep sediment and ruooff completely away from the infiltration area. The area must be staked off and marked so that heavy construction equipment will not compact the soil in the proposed infiltration area. c. To prevent clogging of the infiltration or filtration system, a pretreatment device such as a vegetated filter strip, small sedimentation basin, or water quality inlet (e.g., grit chamber) must be used to settle particulates before the storm water discharges into the infiltration or filtration system. d. Infiltration or filtration systems shan be sufficient to infiltrate or filter a water quality volume of ~/2 inch of runoff from the new impervious surfaces created by the project. C. The water quality volume shall discharge through the soil or fitter media in 48 hours or less. Additional f10ws tliat cannot be infiltrated or filtered in 48 hours should be routed to bypass the system tlirough a stabilized discharge point. A way to visually verit'y that the system is operating as designed must be provided. f Appropriate on-site testing shall be conducted to ensure a minimum of3 feet of separation from the seasonally saturated soils (or from bedrock) and the bottom of the proposed infiltration system. Calculations and computer model results that demonstrate the design adequacy of the infiltration system must be included as part of the SWPPP. wq--Slrm2--5! rage 12 Df26 Perroi( No: MN R 10000'J g_ Adequate maintenance access must be provided (typically 8 k w;dc) along \vith a maintenance plan identifying v..'hom wilt be performing funme mairw::riancc of the inflltration or filtration system. h. Use of designed infiltration systems from industrial areas with exposed significan'l materials or from vehicle fueling and maintenance areas is prohibited. 3. Regional Ponds Regional ponds can be used provided that they are constmcted ponds. noi n natlJf81 '})'edanu or waterbody. (wetlands used as regional ponds must be mitigated for. see Appendix A) and designed in accordance with this pennies design requirements {se~ PSrI lite.)) ror aU \vater from impervjous surfaces that reach the pond. Permittt't:'s shall not constmet regional ponds in wetlands, regardless of their condition, quality or designation by local pInns, unless the mitigative sequence in Appendix A. D.2 of this permit has been completed. There must be no significant degradation of the waterways between the project and the regional pond. The o\'\'ocr must obtain written authorization from the applicable local governmental unit (LGlJ) or private entity that owns and maintains the regional pond. The LGU's or private entity's VIiTilten authorization must identify that the regional pond will discharge 1he water qunlit~, \'olume. V; inch of nmoff from the impervious watershed area) at no more than 5.66 cfs per acre of surface area of the pond. The owner must include the LGU's or private entity's 'written authOlizatiol1 in the SWPPP. The LGU's or private entity's written authorization must be obtained before the owner finalizes the SWPPP and before any application for this permit IS. made 10 the MPCA. 4. Combination of Practices A combInation of practices. including those required by a LGU, \-....hich meet the requirements of Part IIte.I, 2 and 3 respectively, (i.e., wet sedimentation basins, infiltmtion/flhratioIl, and regional ponds) may be used such that the water- qunlity volume of ~"2 inch of runoff from the new impervious surfaces created by the project is accounted for in the (nrnn'!Io pennanem storm water management system (e.g., :14 inch infiltrated and 1/4 inch treated through 3 wet sedimentation basin). Ifany combination of these practices is used, the S\:VPPP must contain documentation (e.g., LGU or private entity's authorization, infiltntion computer model results or calculations, etc.) identifying the volume that cach pmctice addresses. 5. Alternative Method Where an alternative. innovative treatment system is proposed and demons.trated by calculatIOn. design or other independent methods to achieve approximately 80% removal of tot.d suspended solids on an annual average basis, the Commissioner will approve the method jf the process outlined in Pal1lI.B.3.c. is completed, and the following information is submitted: a. An calculations. drainage areas, plans, and specifications for the prorJOsed alternative method and a graphic representation of the area to be served by the method. These items must be included in the SWPPP and submitted to the MPCA at least 90 days prior to the proposed starting date of the construction activity. b. A 2 year monitoring plan to sample nlOoff from the proposed method. The plan must include a discussion ofthe methods lIsed to collect samples. location where samples will be taken (upstream and downstream of the proposed method), frequency ofsmnpJes (minimum of six w(]-slrn12-5J Page l3 of 16 I'c'm,i, No: reiN RIOOOOI runoff events sampled), identifY lab Llsed to analyze the samples and guahty assurance and quality control methods to be used. The plan must include a schedule for subminiug the monitoring data annually, c. A mitigation plan that addresses how the water ()uality volume \vill be tfeated in the eycnt that the monitoring data shows the proposed alternative treatment method does not function as designed. d. The alternative method must achieve approximately 8V~"'~ remm'a] of total suspended solids on an average annLlal basis for the conditions expected at the site. The design must :llso consider public safety, health and water quality concerns. Proprietary information on effectiveness will not be considered for alternative treatment method review and appro\'ill. No construction activity on the project IS covered under this permit until the applicant r(;'cein~s an alternative treatment approval letter from the MPCA as described in Part II.B.J.c. D. RECORD RETENTION The SWPPP,aIl changes to it, and inspections and maintenance records must he kept at the site during construction by the Permittee who has operational control of that portion of the site. The SWPPP can be kept in either the Held office or in an on site vehicle. All owner(s) must keep the S\VPPP, along with the following additional records, on lile for three years after submittal of the NOT as outlined in Part Il.C, This does not include any records after submittal ofthe NOT. L Any other permits required for the project; 2. Records of all inspection and maintenance conducted during construclinn {see Part IV.E. Inspections and Maintenance); 3. All pennanent operation and maintenance agreemenls Ihal havc heen Implemenled, including all right of way, contracts, covenants and other binding requiremerH~ regarding perpetual rnaintenance~ and 4. All required calculations for design of the temporary and permanent storm wnter management systems. PART IV. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REQUIREMENTS A. STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVEl'TION PLAN The Permittee(s) must implement the SWPPP and the requirements of this pML The Best Management Practices (Bi\lPs) identified in the S\VPPP and in this pcnnill11usl be installed in an appropriate and functional manner. B. EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES 1. The Permittee(s) must plan for and implement appropriate constmction phasing. vcgetativt' buffer strips, horizontal slope grading, and other construction pracli(.:cs that minimize erosion, so wq-stnn2"5J PJge: 14 uf26 Pen-nit No: !\r1N R] 0000 J that the inspection and maintenance requirements of Part IV.E. are complied with. The to\;alion ar areas not to be disturbed must be delineated (e.g. with nags, stak~s,_ signs, sill fence etc.) OIl ihe development site before work begins. 2. All exposed soil areas with a continuous positive slope within 2DO lineal feet of <l surface- l,li3it"iT'j must have temponlry erosion protection or permanent cover for the exposed soil areas year round, according to the following table of slopes and time fmmes: Steeper than 3: ] 10:110 3:J Ftanerthan JO:I 7 days 14 days 21 days {lV1aximmnlime an mea om remain open when the area }$ not actively being worked.) Tvne of Slo!1S' Jime_ These areas include constmcted storm water management pond side slopes, and any exposed soil areas with a positive slope to a storm water conveyance system. such .15 a curb and gutter system. stoml sewer inlet, temporary or permanem drainage ditch or other natural or man made systems that discharge to a surface water. Temporary stockpiles without significant silL day or organic components (e.g., clean aggregate stockpiles, demolition concrete stockpiles, sand stockpiles) are exempt from this requirement but must comply with Parr IV.C.5. 3. The normal wetted perimeter of any temporary or permanent drainage ditch that drains water from a construction site, or diverts water around a site, must be stabilizi"d within 200 lineal feet from the property edge, or from the point of discharge to any surface "vater. Stabilization must be completed withjn 24 hours- of connecting to a surface w3ter. 4. Pipe outlets must be provided with temporary or pcm1anent energy dissipation within 24 hours of connection to a surface water. C. SEDJMEN'UXlNTROL PRACTICES 1. Sediment control practices must minimize sediment from entering surface l'Vnters, including curb and gutter systems and stoon sewer inlets. a. Temporary or permanent drainage ditches nod sediment basins that are designed as part of a treatment system (e.g., ditches with rock check darns) require sediment ecntrol practices only as appropriate for site conditions. b. If the down gradient treatment system is overloaded, additional npgmdient sediment control practices must be installed to eliminate the overloading, and the SWPPP must be amended to identify these additional practices as required in Part IILA.4. a. through c. c, In order to maintain sheet flow and minimize rills and/or gullies, lhere shall he no unbroken slope length of greater than 75 feet for slopes with a grade of 3: J or steeper. 2. Sediment control practices must be established on all down gradient perimeters before any upgradien! land disturbing activities begin. These practices s.haH remain in place lIntil final stabilization has been established in accordance with Part IV.G. wq-~tnJ]2-5] Page 15 of26 Permit No: MN RJOOOOI 3. The timing of the installation of sediment control practices may be adjusted to accommodate short~tenn activities sHch as clearing or grubbing, or passage ofvehides. Any short-term activity must be cumpleted as quickly as possible and the sediment control practices must be installed immediately after the activity is completed. However, sediment control practices must be installed before the next precipitation event even irthe activity is not complete. 4. All sturm drain inlets must be protected by appropriate BJ\1Ps during construct!on until all sources with potential for discharging to the inlet have been stabilized. 5. Temporary soil stockpiles must have silt fence or other effective sediment controls. and cannot be placed in surfact' waters, including storm water conveyances such as curb and gutter systems, or conduits and ditches. 6. Vehicle tracking of sediment from the construction site must be minimized by BMPs such as stone pads, concrete or steel wash racks, or equivalent systems. Street sweeping must be used if such BMPs are not adequate to prevent sediment trom being tracked onto the street (see Part IV.EA.d.). 7. The Permittee must install temporary sedimentation basins as required in Part III.B. of this permit. D. DEWATERING AND BASIN DRAINtNG !. Dewatering or basin draining (e.g., pumped discharges, trench/ditch cuts for drainage) related 10 the construction activity that may have turbid or sediment laden discharge water must be discharged to a temporary or pemlanent sedimentation basin on the prqject site whenever possible. If the water cannot be discharged to a sedimentation basin prior to entering the surface water, it must be treated with the appropriate BMPs, such that the discharge does not adversely affect the receiving water or downstream landowners. The Permittee(s) must ensure that discharge points are adequately protected from erosion and scour. The discharge must be dispersed over natural rock riprap, sand bags, plastic sheeting or other accepted energy dissipation measures. Adequate sedimentation control measures arc required for discharge water that contains suspended solids. 2. All water from dewatering or basin draining activities must be discharged in a manner that does not cause nuisance conditions, erosion in receiving channels or 011 downslope properties, or inundation in wetlands causing significant adverse impact to the wetland. E. INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE I, The Permittee(s) (either the owner or operat(lr, whoever is identified in the S\VPPP) must routinely inspect the construction site once every seven (7) days during active construction and within 24 hours after a rainfall event greater than 0.5 inches in 24 hours. 2. All inspections and maintenance conducted during construction must be recorded in writing and these records must be retained with the SWPPP in accordance with Part llI.D. Records of each inspection and maintenance activity shall include: a. Date and time of inspections; wfj.-&rr1ll2-)) Pnge 16 of26 Pennil No: MN RlOOOOI b, Name of person(s") conducting inspections; c. Findings of inspections, including recommendations for corrective actions; d. Correctlve actions taken (including dates, times, and party completing maintenance aClivities); e. Date and amount of all rainfall events greater than 1/2 inch (0.5 inches) in 24 hOUiS; and f. Documentation of changes made to the SWPPP as requirt.."'(] in Part HtA.4. 3 < \Vherc parts of lhe construction site have undergone final stabiliz.ation, but work remains on other parts of the site, inspections of the stabilized areas may be reduced to once per month. \Vhere work has been suspended due to frozen ground conditions, the required inspections and maintenance must take place as soon as runoff occurs at the site or prior to resuming constniction, whichever comes first 4. All erosion prevention and sediment control B1\:lPs must be inspected to ensure integrity and effectiveness. All nonfunctionat BMPs must be repaired, replaced. or supplemented with functional BMPs. The Permittee(s) must investigate and comply with the following inspection and maintenance requirements: a. All silt fences must be repaired, replaced, or supplemented when they become nonfunctional or the sediment reaches j 13 of the height of the fence. These repairs must be made within.l4 hours of discovery, or as soon as field conditions allow access. b. Temporary and permanent sedimentation basins must be drained and the sediment removed when the depth of sediment collected in the basin reaches ][2 the storage volume. Drainage and removal must be completed within 72 hours of discovery, or as soon ilS field conditions allow access (see Part IV D.). c. Surface waters, including drainage ditches and conveyance systems, must be inspected tor evidence of sediment being deposited by erosion. The Permittee(s) must remove all deltas and sediment deposited in surface waters, including drainage ways, catch basins. and other drainage systems, and festabilize the areas where sediment removal results in exposed soil. The removal and stabilization must take place within seven (7) days of discovery unless precluded by legal, regulatory, or physical access constraints. The Permittee shall use all reasonable efforts to obtain access. Ifprccluded, removal and stabilization must take place within seven (7) calendar days of obtaining access. The Permittee is responsible for contacting all local, regional, state and federal authorities and receiving any applicable permits, prior to conducting any work. d, Construction site vehicle exit locations must be inspected for evidence of off-site sediment tracking onto paved surfaces. Tracked sediment must be removed from an off-site paved surfaces, within 24 hours of discovery, or if applicable, within a shorter time to comply with Part lV.C.6, c. The Permittee(s) are responsible for the operation and maintenance oftemporary and penn anent water quality management Br\-1Ps, as well as aU erosion prevention and sedimlfllt control BMPs, for the duration of the construction work at the site. The wq-strm2-S1 Page 1701'26 Pcmlit No: MN RIOOOOt Permittee(s) are responsible muil another Permittee has assumed c<)Dtrol according to Pm1 II.B.5 over all areas o-frhe site that have not been finally stahilized or the site has undergone final stabilization, and a NOT has been submitted to the MPCA. f. If sediment escapes the construction site, off~site accumulations of sediment must be remov~d in a manner and at a frequency sufficient to minimize off~site impacts (e.g., fugitive sediment in streets could be washed into stonn sewers by the next rain and/or pose a safety hazard to users of pub tiC- streets). 5. All infiltration areas must be inspected to ensure that no sediment from ongoing construction activities is rCflching the infiltration area and these areas are protected from compaction due 10 construction equipment driving across the infiltration area. F. POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT MEASURES The Pcrmittec(s) shall implement the following pollution prevention management measures on the site: I. Solid Waste; CoItected sediment, asphalt and concrete millings, floating debris, paper, plastic, fabric, construction and demolition debris and other wastes must be disposed of properly and must comply with MPCA disposal requirements. 2. Hazardous Materials: Oil, gasoline, paint and any hazardous substances must be properly stored, including secondary containment, to prevent spills, leaks or other discharge. Restricted access.to storage areas must be provided to prevent vandalism. Storage and disposal of hazardous waste must be in compliance with MPCA regulations. 3. External washing o-[trucks and other construction vehicles must be limited to a defined area of the site. Runoff must be contained and waste properly disposed of. No engine degreasing is allowed on site. G. FINAL STABILIZATION The Permittee(s) must ensure final stabilization of the sire. The PermiUee(s) must submit a NOT within 30 days after final stabilization is complete, or another owner/operator (Permittee) has assumed controlllccording to Part ILB.5 over all areas of the site that have not undergone final stabilization. final stabilization can be achieved in one of the following ways: 1. AH soil disturbing activities at the site have been completed and aU soils must be stabilized by a uniform perennial vegetative cover with a density of 70 percent over the entire pervious surface area, Of other equivalent means necessary to prevent soil failure under erosive conditions and; a. All drainage ditches, constructed to drain water from the site after construction is complete, must be stabilized to preclude erosion; b. All temporary synthetic, and stmctural erosion prevention and sediment control BIVIPs (such as silt fence) must be removed as part of the site final stabilization; and c. The Permittee(s) must clean out all sediment from conveyances and from temporary sedimentation basins that are to be used as permanent water quality management basins. wq-slrm2-51 P~gr JX 0126 f'ennit NiY :\'IN R 1 Ol)OO j Sediment must be stabilized to prevenl it from being \va;.;hcu b~1.ck inlolhe basin, rmp:~y,mc:~; m drainage ways discharging off-site or to surface wnters. The deanoUI -of pcnmmen! oasms IntiS; be sufficient to return the basin 10 design capacity. 2. For residential constmction only. final stabilization has been achieved whentempornr~' rr.os)oJi protection and down gradient perimeter control for individuallols. has been completed and the residence has been transferred to the homeo\vner. Additionally, the Permittee mllSl uistributt' the MPCA "homeowner factsneet" to the homeowner 10 inform lhe homeo'NDcr of !h(' net'd fN, Jnd benefits of, final ~tabilizatjon. PART V. GENERAL PROVISIONS A. APPLICABILITY CIUTERIA 1. If the Commissioner determines that storm water discharges associmed ~...itn D construction activity are contributing to a violation of a water quality standard or would be more appropriately regulated by an individual pennit, the Commissioner may require the o..";lf"r 10 be (overed by an individual storm water discharge pemlit. The Commissioner may require the mHU'T 1-0 develop and implement specific BI\-lPs and monitor the dischnrge from the site. If applicable, 1.lp0n issuance of an individual pennit, this general permit would no longer apply. 2. lfthe temlS and conditions of this general penn!l cannot be met, an owner may request;:1O individual pennit, in accordance with Minn. R. 7001. B. RESPONSE The SWPPP, including all cenificates. reports. records. or other information required by this pennit, must be made available to federal, state, and IDea! officials within 72 hours upon request for lhe duration ofthe permit and for t!m.'e years follov,'ing the :\(rL This docs nOlll1c:ltJde uny records after submittal of tbe NOT. C. PROHIBITIONS This pennit prohibits discharges of any material other than s.torm \yaler. and discharges from dewatering or basin draining activities in accordance \vith PanIV.D.l and 2_ For ci.l.lmpJe. prohibited discharges include but are not limited to vchide and equipmcDI washing, JTIHIfHCnilncc spills. wash waterj and discharges of oil and other hazardDUS substlcmccs. D. TRANSFER OF o\VNERSHlP OR CONTROL This pennit may not be assigned or transferred by the permit holder excep1 when transfer occurs in accordance with the applicable requirements ofPanll,B.5. E. CIVIL AND CRIMINAL LIABILITY Nothing in this permit must be construed to relieve the Permittee(s) from ciyi) or cnminal p>:nalties for noncompliance- with the temlS and conditions provided herein. Nothing in this peITllll Iml.".! !:~ construed to predude the initiation of any legal action or relieve the P{'rmiU('{'(s) frorn any responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties to which the Permittee(~) is or may be subject 10 under Section 311 of the Act and Minn. Smt. chs. ] j 5 and Ii 6, as amended. The Pf.'rmittff(s) JTe nOI jj~lble wl:j,stnn2.51 Page 19 of26 Permit No: MN RIOOOOI for penn!l requirements for .activities occurring on those portions of a site \vhere another party has submitted a subdivision short foml registration as described in Pan H. B.5 or a NOT has been issued by the MPCA except for responsibilities listed under Part 1ll.c:.5 if applicable. F. SEVERABILJTY The provisions of this pemlit are severable. If any provision of this peru)it, or the application of any provision of this pemiil to any circumstances, is held invalid, the application of sllch provision to other circumstances, and the remainder of this permit rrlllst not be affected thereby. G. NPDES/SDS RULE STANDARD CONDfTlONS The Perrnittee(s) must comply with the provisions of Minn. R. 7001.0150, snbp. 3 and 7001.1090, subp. ] .A,B,e,H,!. This permit docs not require the submittal of a data monitoring reporl, except where monitoring is required in Part I1LCS. H. INSPECTION AND ENTRY The Perrnittee(s) must comply with the provisions of40 CFR 122.4](i), Minn. Stat. Ch. 115.04 and Minn. Stat. Ch. 115B.t7. The Permittee(s) shall allow representatives of the MPCA or any member, employee or agent thereof, when authorized by it. upon presentation of credentials, to entcr upon any property. public or private. for the purpose of obtaining information or examination of records or conducting surveys or investigations. APPENDIX A A. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS All requirements in this Appendix arc in addition to BJ\.'lPs already specified in the permit. Where provisions of Appendix A contlict with requirements clsc\vhere in the pennit, the provisions in Appendix A take precedence. All B1\tlPs used to comply with this Appendix mlist be documented in the SWPPP for the project. If the terms and conditions ofthi5 Appendix cannot be met, an individual permit will be required in accordance with Minn. R. ch. 700 L B. REQUIREMENTS FOR DISCHARGES TO SPECIAL WATERS Additional BMPs together with enhanced runoff controls, are required for discharges to the following spcciat waters (part B.l through B.8 of Appendix A). The BMPs identified for each special water are required for those areas of the project draining to a discharge point on the project that is within 2000 feet of a special water and flows to that special water. L \Vilderness areas: Boundary \-Vaters Canoe Area Wilderness; Voyageurs National Park; Kettle River from the site of the fanner dam at Sandstone to its confluence with the Saint Croix River; Rum River from Ogechie Lake spillway to the northernmost confluence with Lake Onamia. Discharges to these waters must incorporate the BMPs outlined in C.1, C.2, C.3 and C.4 of this appendix. 2. i\fississippi River: Those portions from Lake Itasca to the southerly boundary of Morrison County that are included in the Mississippi Headwaters Board comprehensive plan dated wq.strrrl-51 Page 20 of 26 Permil No: PAN R I DOOO] Febmary 12, ] 981. Discharges to rhese waters mustinc-orporate- the B1VliP:g oudincd in C.l. C.2 and C.3 of this appendix. 3. Scenic or recreational river segments: Saint Cmix rivCL entire length; Cannon River from northern city limits ofParibault to its confluence with the Mississippi River; North Fork of the Crow River from Lake Koronis outlet to the l'vfeeker-Wright count)' line; Kettle River from north Pine County line to the sHe of the former dam at Sandstone; Minnesota River from Lac qui Parle dam to Redwood County state aid highway 11:, Mississippi River from county state aid hjghw~lY 7 bridge in Saint C!oud 10 northwestern city limits of Anoka; and Rum River from st<lte ~jd Hlghway 27 bridge in Onamia (0 Madison and Rice streets in Anoka. Discharges to these waters must incorporate the BMPs outlined in C.], C.2 and C.3 of this appendix. 4. Lake Superior: (prohibited nnd restrlcted) Dis..:hmges to Lake Superior must incorporate the BMPs outlined in C. I, C.2 and C.3 of1his appendix. 5. l.ake Trout Lakes: Identified in Minn. R. 7050.0470, induJing those inside the boundaries of the Boundary Waters. Canoe Area Wilderness and Voyageurs National Park. Discharges to these waters must incorporate the BMPs outlined in C 1, C.2, C.3 rind C.4 of this appendix. 6. Trout Lakes: identified in Minn. R. 6264.0050, subp. 2. Discharges to these \\'atcrs must incorporate the BMPs outlined in C.I, C.2, C.3, and C.4 "fthis appendix. 7. Scientific and natural areas: Boot Lake, Anoka County; Kenle River in sections 15. 22, 23, T 41 N, R 20, Pine County; Pennington Bog. Beltrami County; Purvis lake-Ober Foundation, Saint Louis County; Waters within the borders ofhasca Wilderness Sanctuary, Clean-vater County; Iron Springs Bog, Clearwater County; \Volsfdd \Voods, Hennepin COllnty; Green Water Lake, Becker County; Blackdog Preserve, Dakota County; Prairie Bush Clover, Jackson County~ Black Lake Bog, Pine COtlnty~ Pembina Trail Preserve, Polk County; and Falls Creek, Washington County. Discharges to these waters must incorporate the liMPs outlined in C.), C.2, C3 and C.4 of this appendix. 8. Trout Streams: listed in Minn. R. 6264.0050, subp. 4. Discharges to these waters must incorporate the BMPs outlined in Appendix A C.I. ( .2. CJ, and C.S "fthis appendix. C. ADDITIONAL B\1PS FOR SPECtAL WATERS For the BMPs described in C.2, C.4 and C.S oflhi, Al2l''''ldlX: Where the proximity to bedrock precludes the installation of any of the permanent storm water management practices outlined in Appendix A, other Heatment such as grassed sw.lles, smaller ponds, or grit chambers is required prior to discharge to surface \linters. For work on road projects where the lack of right of way precludes the installation of any of Ihe permanent storm water management practices outlined in Appendix A, other treatment such .as grassed swales. smaller ponds. or grit chambers is required prior to discharge to surface w3tfrs. I. During construction. a. All exposed soil arens with a slope of 3; J or steeper, that have a continuous positive slope 10 a special water must h~lVe temporary ~rosjon protection or perman~nt co"Verr within 3 days wq'SInn2-SJ Page 2 t of26 Pennit No: MN RJOOOOl after the area is no longer ac-tivcly being .worked. All other slopes that have a continuous positive slope to a special water must have temporary erosion protection or permanent cover within 7 days after the area is no longer actively being worked. b. Temporary sediment basin requirements described in Pan III.13.J-5 must be used for common drainage locations that serve an area with five (5) or more acres disturbed at one time. 2. Post construction.. The water quaIit)' volume that must be treated by the project's pennanent storm water management system described in Pan m.c. shall be one (1) inch of runoff from the new impervious surfaces created by the project. 3. Buffer zone. An undisturbed buffer zone of not less than 100 linear ket from the special water (not including tributaries) shall be maintained fit aU times. Exceptions from this requirement for areas. such as water crossings or limited water access, are allowed if the Permittee fully documents in the S\VPPP the circumstances and reasons that the buffer encroachment is necessary. All potential water quality, scenic and other environmental impacts of these exceptions must be minimized and documented in the S\VPPP for the project. 4. Enhanced runoff controls. The pennanent storm water management system must be designed such that the pre and post project runoff rate and votume from the t, and 2-year 24-hour precipitation events remains the same. 5. Temperature Controls. The pennanent storm water management system must be designed such that the discharge from the project will minimize any jncrease in the temperature of trout stream receiving waters resulting from the I, and 2-year 24-hourprecipitation events. This includes all tributaries of designated trout streams within the section that the trout stream is located. Projects that discharge to trout streams must minimize the impact using one or more of the following measures, in order of preference: a. Minimize new impervious surfaces. b. Minimize the discharge from connected impervious surfaces by discharging to vegetated areas, or grass swales, and through the use of other non-structural controls. c. Infiltration or evapotranspiration of runoff in excess of pre-project conditions (up to the 2- year 24-hour precipitation event). d. If ponding is used. the design must include an appropriate combination of measures" such as shading, filtered bottom withdrawal) vegetated swale discharges or constructed wetland treatment cells that will limit temperature increases. The pond should be designed to draw down in 24 hours or less. e. Other methods that will minimize any increase in the temperature of the trout stream. D. REOUIREMENTS FOR DISCHARGING TO WETLANDS If the project has any storm water discharges with the potential for significant adverse impacts to a wetland (e.g., conversion ofa natural wetland to a storm water pond) ,the Permittee(s) must demonstrate that the wetland mitigative sequence has been followed in accordance with D.) or D.2 of this appendix. 1. I f the potential adverse impacts to a wetland on a specific project site have been addressed by pennits or other approvals from an official statewide program (V,S. Army Corps of Engineers 404 program, Minnesota Department of Natura! Resources, or the State of Minnesota Wetland wq'l;lnn2-51 Page 22 of 26 Pemlit No: MN R 10000 j Conservation Act) that are issued specifically for the project and project site, the PcrmiHee may use the permit or other determination issued by these agencies to shmv lhat the p01enliul adverse impacts have been addressed. For the purposes of this pennlt, derninirmls actions are determinations by the pennitting agency that address the project impacts, \-"he-reas a non~ jurisdictional determination does not address project impacts. 2. If there are impacts from the project that are not addressed in one of the pennits or other determinations discussed in Appendix A, Part D.l {e.g., permanent inundation or tlooding of the wetland. signific2Dt degradation of water quality, excavation, filling, draining), the PermUtt<1' must minimize all adverse impacts to wetlands by utilizing appropriate measures. Measures used must be based on the nature of the wetland, its vegetative community rypes and the established hydrology. These measures include in order of preference: a. Avoid aU significant adverse impacts to wetlands from the projecl and post project discharge. b. Minimize any unavoidable impacts from the project and pOSl project discharge. c. Provide compensatory mitigation when the Permittee determines that there is no reasonable and practicable alternative to having a significant adverse impact on a wetland. For compensatory mitigation, wetland restoration or creation shaH be of the same type, size and whenever reasonable and practicable in the same watershed as the impacted wetland. E. DISCHARGES REOUIRING ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW This penni! does not replace or satisfy any environmental review requirements, including those under the Minnesota Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) or the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The owner must complete any environmental review required by law, including any required Environmental Assessment Work Sheets or Environmental Impact Statements. Federal environmental review. or other required review. F. DISCHARGES AFFECTING ENDANGERED OR THREATENED SPECIES This permit does not replace or satisfy any review requirements for Endangered or Threatened species, from new or cxpnnded discharges that adversely impact or contribute to adverse impacts on a listed endangered or threatened species or adversely modify a designated critical habitat. The owner must conduct any required review and coordinate with appropriate agencies for any project with the potential of affecting threatened or endangered species, Of their critical habitat. G. DISCHARGES AFFECTING HISTORIC PLACES OR ARCHEOLOGICAL SITES This permit does not replace or satisfy any review requirements for Historic Pldces or Archeological Sites, from new or expanded discharges which adversely affect properties listed or eligihle for listing in the National Register of Historic Places or affecting known or discovered Archeological Sites. The owner must be in complianc-e with National Historic Preservation Act and conduct all required review and coordination related to historic preservation, including significant anthropological sites and any burial sites, with the t'v1innesota Historic PreserviJtion Officer. wq.slnn2-5 ! Pallc ~3 of:::'o Permit No: \tiN R 1 OOOO! APPENDIX B. DEFINITIONS L "Best Management Practices (Bl\1Ps)" means erosion and sediment control and water quality management practices that are the most effective and- practicable means of controlling, prc\.enting, and minimizing degradation of surface water, including avoidance of impacts, constmction-phasing, minimizing the length of time soil areas are exposed, prohibitions, and other management practices published by state or designated area-wide planning agencies. Individual BrVtps found in this permit are described in the current vCbion of Protcctine \\'atcr Quality in lli:!!!!! Areas, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 2000. BMPs must bc adapted to the site and can be adopted from other sources. However. they must be similar in purpose and 3t lens! as effective and stringent as MPCA's B1\1Ps. (Other source:; include manufacturers specifications, Storm Water Manal!ement for Construction Activities: DevtloD'De Pollution Prevention Plans and Best Mana2.ement Practices, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1992, and Erosion Control Desi2"n .Manual, Minnesota Department of Transportation, et aI, 1993) 2. HCommissioner" means the Commissioner of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency or the Commissioner's designee. 3. .'Common Plan of Development or Sale" means a contiguous area where multiple separate and distinct land disturbing activities may be taking prace at different times, on ditTerent schedules. but under one proposed plan. One plan is broadly defined to include design. pennit appliclltion. advertisement or physical demarcation indicating that land-disturbing activities may occur, 4. "Construction Activity" For this pennit, construction activit), includes construction activity as defined in 40 C.F.R. part 122.26(b)( 14)(x) and small construction activit}. as dcfincd in 40 CF.R. part J22.26(b)(l5). This includes a disturbance to the land that results in a change in the topography. existing soil cover (both vegetative and non-vegetative). or the existing soil topography that may result in accelerated storm water runoff. leading to soil erosion and mon'ment of sediment into surface waters or drainage systems. Examples of construction activity may include clearing. grading. filling and excavating. Construction activit)" includes the disturbance of less than one acre of total land area that is a part of a larger common plan of development or sale if the larg.er common plan will ultimately disturb one (I) acre or more. 5. "Dewatering" means the removal of water for construction a('ti\.it~.. It can be a discharge of appropriated surface or groundwater 10 dry andJor solidify a CO!1sttlJclion site. It may require Minnesota Department of Natural Resources pennits to be appropriated and if contaminated lTlay require other MPCA permits to be discharged. 6. "Energy Dissipation" means methods employed at pipe outlets to prevent en/sian. Exampk's include. but are not limited to: concrete aprons, riprap. spiash pads, and gab ions that are designed to prevent erosion. 7. '~Erosion Prevention" means measures employed to prevent erosion including but nOllimitcd to: soil stabilization practices, limited grading, mulch, temporary or permanent cm'cr, and constfUl...'lion phasing. 8. ltFillal Stabilization" means that either: a. All soil disturbing activities at the site have been completed and a uniform (e.g.. c\'cnly distributed, without large bare urea:;) perennial vegetative cover with a density of700,u of the wq,slrm2.5i Page 24 of 26 Permit No: j'\:lN f~ 1 00001 native background vegetative cover for the area hClS been established on all unpaved areas and areas not covered by permanent stmctures, or equIvalent permanent stabjJjz~tjon measures (such as the use of riprap, gabions. or geotextiles) have been employed; b. For individual lots in residential constmcllon by either: (a) The homebuilder completing final stabilization as specified above, or (b) the homebuilder establishing temporary stabilizmion including perimeter controls for an individual lot prior to occupation of the home by the homeowner and informing the homeowner of the need for, and benefits o1~ final st3hilizath:m. (Homeowners typically have an incentive to pur in the landscapjng functionally cquiv.rJlent to final stabilization as quick as possible to keep mud out ofthe-ir homes and off sidewalks .and driveways.); or c. For constmction projects on land used for agricultural purposes (e.g'l pipelines across crop or range land) final stabilization may be accomplished by returning the disturbed land to its preconstruction agricultural use. Areas disturbed that \\'cre not previously used for agricultural activities, such as buffer strips immediately adjacent io surface waters and drainage systems, and areas which are not being returned to their preconstruction agricultural use must meet the final stabilization criteria in (aJ or (b) above. 9. "General Contractorll means the party who signs the constmction contract \-vith the owner to construct the project described in the final plans and specifications. Where the construction project involves more than one contractor, the general contractor wilI be the pany responsible for managing the project on behalf of the owner. In some cases, the owner may be the general contractor. In these cases, the owner may contract an individual as the operator who \ivould become the Co- Pemlittee. 10. "Homeowner Factsheet" means a fact sheet developed by the MPCA to be given to homeowners at the time of sale by a builder to infonn the homeowner urthe need for, and benefits of, final stabilization. ]1. "Impervious Surface" means a constructed hard surface that either prevents or r~tards the entry of water into the soil and causes water to mn off the surface in greater quantities and at an increased rate of flow than prior to development. Examples include rooftops, sidewalks, patios, driveways, parking lots, storage areas, and concrete, asphalt, or grave! roads. 12. "National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)" means the program for issuing, modifying, revoking, reissuing, terminating, monitoring. and enforcing permits under the Clean Water ACI (Sections 30],318,402, and 405) and Uniled Stales Code ofFederat Regulations Title 33, Sections 13t7, 1328, ]342, and 1345.. 13. "Normal \-Vetted Perimeter" means the area 01'<1 conveyance, such as a ditch, channel, or pipe that is in contact with water during flow events that are expected to occur once every year. 14, "Notice of Termination" means notice to tenninate coverage under this pennit after constmction is complete, the site has undergone fin a! stahilization, and maintenance agreements for all pcrrmment facilities have been established, in accordance with all applicable conditions of this pennit. Notice of Termination forms are available from the MPCA_ 15. '~Operator" means the person (usually the g('ner:al ,:ontractor), designated by the owner, who has day to day operational control and!orthe abjJjty to modify project plans and specifications related to wq-strm2-51 Page 25 of 26 Pemlit No: MN RIOOOOI the SWPPP. The person must be knowledgeable in those areas of the pennit for which the operator is responsible, (Part II.S, and Part IV.) and must perfoffil those responsibilities in a workmanlike manner. 16. I'Owner" means the person or party possessing the title of the land on which the constmctlon activities will occur; or if the construction activity is for a lease holder, the party or individual identified as the lease holder; or the contracting government agency responsible for the construction activity. 17. "Permanent Cover" means final stabilization. Examples include grass, gravel, asphalt, and concrete. i 8. "Permittee" means a person or persons, finn, or governmental agency or other institution that signs the application submitted to the MPCA and is responsible for compliance with the terms and conditions of this pennit. J 9, .'Saturated Soil" means the highest seasonal elevation in the soil that is in a reduced chemicai state because of soil voids being filled with water. Saturated soil IS evidenced by the presence of redoximorphic features or other information. 20. "Sediment Control" means methods employed to prevent sediment from leaving the $itc. Sediment control practices include silt fences, sediment traps, earth dikes, drainage swales, check darns, subsurface drains, pipe slope drains, storrndrain inlet protection, and temporary or permanent sedimentation basins. 2 J. "Small Construction Activity" means small constmction activity as defined in 40 C.F.R. part I 22.26(b)(l 5) . Small construction activities include clearing, grading and excavating that result in land disturbance of equal to or greater than one acre and less than five acres. Small construction activity includes the disturbance ofless than one (I) acre of total land area that is part of a larger common plan of development or sale if the larger common plan wilI ultimately disturb equal to or greater than one and less than five (5) acres. 22. "Stabilized" means the exposed ground surface has been covered by appropriate materials such as mulch, staked sod, riprap, wood fiber blanket, or other material thai prevents erosion from occurring. Grass seeding is not stabilization. 23. "Standard Plates" means general drawings having or showing similar characteristics or qualities that are representative of a construction practice or activity. 24. "Storm water" is defined under Minn. R. 7077.0105, subp. 41(b), and includes precipitation runoff, storm water runoff, snow melt nmoff, and any other surface nmoff and drainage. 25. ~'Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan" means a plan for storm water discharge that includes erosion prevention measures and sediment controls that, when implemented, will decrease soil erosion on a parcel orland and decrease off-site nonpoiflt pollution. 26. "'Surface Water or Waters" means all streams, lakes, ponds, marshes. wetlands. reservoirs, springs, rivers. drainage systems, \vaterways, I,.vatercourses, and irrigation systems whether natural or artificial, public or private. WQ-strrn2-S1 Page 26 of 26 Pennit No:",fN R 1 0000 i 27. "Temporary Erosion Protection" means methods employed to prevent erosion. Examples of temporary cover include; straw, wood fiber blanket, wood chips, and erosion netting. 28, "Underground \Vaters" means water contained below the surface ofthe eilrth in the s[ltumted zone including, wi[hout limitation, all waters whether under confined, unconfined, or perched conditions, in near surface unconsolidated sediment or regolith, or in rock formations deeper underground. The ternl ground water shall be synonymous with underground water. 29. "Waters orthe State" (as defined in Minn. Stul. S 115.01, suhd. 22) means all streams, lakes, ponds, marshes, watercourses, waterways, weBs, springs, reservoirs, aquifers, inigation systems, drainage systems and all other bodies or accumulations afwmer, surface or underground, natural or artificial, public or private, which are contained within, flow through, or border upon the state or any portion thereof 30. "'Vater Quality Volume" means :Ji inch of runoff from the new impervious surfaces created by 1his project and is the volume of water to be treated in the pennunent storm water management system, as required by this permit except as provided in Appendix A.C.2. 3 t. "Wetland" or "Wetlands" is defined in Minn. R, 7050.0130, sllbp. F and includes those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface water or grOlmdwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generaHy include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas. Constmcted wetlands designed tor wastewater treatment are not waters of the state. Wetlands must have the following attributes: a. A predominance of hydric soils; b. lnundated or saturated by surface water or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support a prevalence of hydrophytic vegetation typically adapteu for life in a saturated soil condition; and C. Under normal circumstances support a prevalence of such vegetation. wg.stnJ11.S1 ill!f'l'j;! Proprietary systems used as an example oniy - NOT an endorsement Design Criteria: ... Pollutants of interest for reduction .. Desired removal effidency .... Des!gn flow or volume, site constraints on size, desired location of treatment unit .... Pre-treatment requirements ~ Installation and maintenance costs, life of unit Benefits: .. Units are typically undergrollmJ or within existing structures and do not consume much site space .... Fiitration devices can be customized to reduce a specific pollutant of concern .... Gem often be easily incorporated into fully developed sites ... Can be used for pre~treatment prior to infiltration practices .. Relevant for use on industrial sites bec8use filters can remove pollutants such as metals and oiis Limitations: .. Efficiency has no! been widely tested .... Each type of unit has specific design constraints and limitalions for use ~ Can be more costly that other treatment me-thoels >- Treatment may be grp.aUy reduced it -frequent maintemmce IS not conducted .... Subject to freezing in cold climates Deti n itian: Filtration devices (inserts_J allow stormwater to pass through filter media which are designed to reduce specific stormwater pollutants, but primarily solids and oils. Pollutants are captured physically or through sorption onto the fHter media. Filters may either be inserts that are retrofitted into existing caleh basins or manholes, or stand alone units supplied by a manufacturer. Water Quality (V 'No) Channel Protection (V Cl-') Overbank Flood Protection {V PI\)) Extreme Flood Protection (V P1(}(!) Recharge Volume (V R~) Screening! Filtration Temperature Control Settling Evaporation Transpiration Soil Adsorption Biologica!J Micro Uptake T olal Suspended Solids Nutrients - Total Phosphorusl Total Nitrogen Metals Cadmium, Copper, Lead, ~md Zinc Pathogens - Coliform, Streptococci E. Coli TOXins Chloride, Hydrocarbon, Pesticide Description: Filtration devices, depending on the design, can treal stormwater to reduce nutrients, sedfmenl, floatables, metals, oil, and/or organic compounds. Different filtration media are used depending on the type of pollutant to be removed. Filter media may be a screen, fabric, activated carbon, perlite, zeolite, or other materials. Often a combination of filter media can be used to target the specific pollutants of interest. These devices differ from the structurat stormwater fillers described in Chapter 12 in two aspects. First, these devices are proprietary and are designed to fit as an insert into the hydrauiic infrastructure (eg. a catch basin). Second, the media material may have unique characteristics which are different from the soil/sand media recommended for general stormwater filtration. Filtration devices have been developed for LtSe in locations such as underground chambers, catch basins, trench drains, and roof drains. Ttle manufacturer specifications should indicate key design parameters such as size, allowable flow rate, allowable pollutant concentrations, and removal efficiency. A bypass should be part of the system to allow high flows to drcumvent the filtration device. Performance data are often provided by the manufacturer. Users should review this information to ensure it was provided by an independent source. The MPCA Construction Genera! Permit allows limited use of proprietary devices or "alternatfve methods." Use of the alternative device as a stand alone BMP must be approved by the MPCA prior to installation. Approval is limited to those devices thaI achieve approximately 80% removal of total suspended soilds. Additionally, the MPCA requires a two-year monitoring plan to measure the actual effectiveness of the method. If a device does not meet this 80% total suspended solids removal requirement, then these devices could be used as pretreatment or supplemental to another stormwater practice. Selection: When selecting or specifying a filtration device, designers should research the following: 1. What are the minimum or maximum drainage areas recommended for the device or method? 2. What flow rates or volumes can the device accommodate? Wilt accessory structures be necessary to divert high flow arollnd Ihe filtration device? 3. What are the characteristics of the pollutants in the water used for testing? What particle size distribution was tested? Research protocols used for testing. 4. Are pollutant removal tests verified by independent organizations such as USEPA, University of New Hampshire, University of Minnesota, Wisconsin Departmenl of Natural Resources, or others? 5. Does the device contain a by-pass for high flows? If so, then what is Ihe percentage of flow is prior to by-pass. 6. What are the construction costs? Does the cost include an materials, installation, and delivery? 7. \A/hat are the maintenance requirements? What are the costs of the required maintenance? Is there a standard operation and maintenance plan? What is the typical life of the filtration unit? 8. Does the local regulatory authority approve the use of filtration devices? 9. Will the manufacturer provide design computations and CADD details? Courtesy of The Green fnstilufe - Minneapolis, MN 8 . . ... Design Criteria: )to Structural load capacity. how much weigh! the roof can hold. is a major factor in determining whether the green roof is "exlenslve" or "jntensive" (see next page) JI> Vegetation selection is based on numerous factors including, growlh medium depth, microclimate, Irrigation availability and maintenance. ~ A leak detec~ion system is recommended to quickly delect ancllocale leaks. 1>. Modul8r products can increase installation and repair efficiency. Benefits: )to Reduce, deiay, and cool stormwater runoff ... Insulate buildings and lower energy consumption and costs. ... Provide habitat for birds and insects. .... Increase longevity of traditional roofing systems by protecting from ultraviolet rays. to. Reduce carbon dioxide levels and heat island effect. Limitations: .... Cost is higher than traditfonal roofing systems - can be significant for retrofits, .... leaks can cause significanl damage and can be hard to locate and repair \Nithout an electronic leak detection system ... Conditions Gan be harsh for vegetation establishment. ... Maintenance needs can be higher than tradilional roofing system. t GREEN ROOFS Definition: Green roofs consist of a series of layers that creElle an Environment suitable for plant growth wi/hOl!l damaging the underlying rool system. Green roofs create green space for public benefit, energy efficiency, ane! stormwater retenlionl detention. Water Quality {V '~m) Channel Protection tV 0') Overbank Flood Protection (V I"l!J) Extreme Flood Proteclion (V PHi';) Recharge Volume {Re) Infiltration" 1'>'1" ao"."pn:1l" ~,):t;~ ,:,\o;JLln],,,,, Screening! Filtration Temperature Control Seltling Transpimtkln "',lw,~I~"",! SoB Adsorption Biologicali Micro. Up!ake T olal Suspended Solids Nutrienls - Total PhosphoflJS/ Total Nitrogen Metals ~ Cadmium, Copper, Lead. and Zmc Pa!ho,gens.- Colifoml, Stn~ptococci, E. Coli Toxins - Chloride, Hydrocarbons Pesticides /'iOle Pollurian (8r1'lOW31 pefl781l1og0S apply 10 vo!(1m~ 01 runof//reared, amJ(lollovoiumebYP8SSed Dr'-'llnc-1qE: I\rea Max Slop Min. Depth 10 Bedrock Min. DepU'l 10 Water Tablp SCS Soil T ypu (".' Il'_'i",r:<I"'C."[,c"",,.;.',.<....,,j, "":',)'''''''<1''''''.'1''8 ,,,"_I"";""'b! Freeze/Cfhaw Suitability Po\enlia! HotspOt Runoff ',~q"''''>''''II"mW[lI)(l"'''''''' Description: There are two systems of green roofs, extensive and intensive. composed of the same system of layers. Extensive systems are lighter, typically have 4 inches or less of growing medium, use drought tolerant vegetation, and can structurally support limited uses (such as maintenance personnel). Intensive systems are heavier, have a greater soil depth, can support a wider range of plants, and can support increased pedestrian traffic. Rainfall is initially intercepted by vegetation, held on foliage, or soaked up by plant roots. Any remaining runoff filters through the growing medium and IS drained away from the roof's surface by the drainage layer. Some drainage systems use small depressions to store excess water for uptake during drier conditions (RCWD 2005), while others provide an overflow for larger rainfall events. ~> TYPtCAlGREEN ~ ROOF PROFILE 1';'1 "'I r-WfENSlVE Raingarden in a corl1mercial deveicpmenl - Stillwater, tvlN Design Criterja~ ~ InfiHration requires sui!~lble soils. ~ Minimum 10' setback and located clown grade from home foundations. .. Best applied to drainage areas with relatively flat slopes (s%). Benefits: .... Can be very effective for removing fine sediment, tr8ce metals, nutrients, bacteria and organics (Davis et 81. 1998) p Provides many additional environmental (habitat, improves air qualily urban micro- climates), social ( creates a unique sense of place) and economic benefits ( reduces development ancl maintenance cost, greater lot yield, increases property values). ~ \/Vetl suited fOf high impervious areas, ... Reduces runoff volume. )0- Flexible design, affording many opportunities for creativity_ limitations: .. Susceptible to clogging by sediment; therefore maintenance Clnd pretreatrnenl is necessary to maintain effectiveness. Jp- Not efFective for large drain8ge areas (use mulHple structures, closer \0 source of runoff). ~ Space consumption (51)/0- '100/0 of drainage area). Definition: Bioretention is a terrestrial-based (up~ land as opposed to wetland), water quality Elnd water quantity control process. Biorelentloo employs a s[mplisl!c, site integrated design that provides opportlmity 'for rllnoff infiltration, Hllration, storage and water uptake by vegetation. "''Valer Ouality (V'/.J(j) Channel Protection (V cp) Overbank Flood Protection (V P-In) Extreme Flood Protection (V l-'il,l')) Recharge Volume tV m) Infl'tration .,...:h i1ppmpml!>> ,O<!,);~ ,,,Ii.. ,-,,,,,11;,,.,,,, Filtration Temperature Control Settling Evaporalion T mnspimlion Soil Ads01ption Biologic81! Micro. Uptake T atal Suspended -Solids Nutrients - Total Phosphorus/ Total Nitrogen Metals - CEldmiurTl, Copper, Leia-d, and Zinc Pathogens - Coliform, Streptococci, E. Coli 'leSSl1m":;"":!.'~",,,i~';;$I,,'h,'S Toxins - Chloride, t-tydrocarbon, Pesticide .I,~~,: "1')'1:; ';j,IFP~l>J," ."'~,I'"o Lino Lakes Gify !-fail- Infil!ralion trench Lino Lakes, MN Bradshaw Celebration of Life Cenler - underground storage & infillration Stiflwater, MN Design Criteria: .. ContribuUnn drainage area ... Underlying soil types ... Depth to the water table, bedrock or other impeding layer .... Proximity to buildings, drin!\ing water supplies, karst features, etc.. ... Source of stormwater runoff Benefits: ... Reduces volume of stormwater runoff ... Increases groundwater recharge ... Improves surface waler quality ... Provides thermal benems (e,g. to cold water fisheries) .... Mimics pre-development hydrology Limitations: l> Unusual construction considerations > Potential for groundwater contamination ~ Tendency to lose effectlveness over Orne due to dogging - if not properly constructed or maintained ... Not recommended for areas with sleep slopes t> May require landscaping: consider8tion should be given to periods on inundation cmd drought i , Definition: Natural or constructed depressions located in permeable soils that capture, store and infiltrate the volume of stormwater runoff associated with a parllcular design event. Water Quality (V wu) Channel Protection (V lY) Overbank Frood Protection (V "-.1'1) Extreme Flood Protection (V Pl(Jo) Recharge Volume (V HI) InfiltratIon Screening! Filtration Temperature Control Settling EVr.1poT8tion Transpiration .,f "C~'1,1Itd Soil Adsorption Biological! Micro. Uptake Total Suspended Solids Nutrients - Total Phosphorus! Total Nitrogen Metals - Cadmium. Copper Lead, and Zinc P8thogens - Coliform, Streptococci, E. Coli Toxins - Chloride, Hydrocarbon, Pesticide Dr;:Jin~1C)8 Area For Filtration Desiun-(Pl;-)r Pr;:lctice) Dr3inage Area i-or Infillr;Jtton Design (PE-)r Pi<:1ctlce) Mol.. Slope 01 Site [vlJn. D(:~p[h to Bndwck (;< Se"j- son81ly Hi~j'""1 \Nater T8ble Nr~CS Soil Type I)""".,,] ,"";f.Dso;llyp,',; ;.,a.u<J;l.',calions "''''''":,,,.,,,,' r reezci ThelW SuitcibiHty Polcnti<.:11 Hotspot Runoff '"''lL~''''' ""p~""<'"hl''' I"',!r Description: In general, bioretenHon systems can be described as shallow, landscaped depressions commonly located in parking lot islands or within sma I! pockets in residential areas that receive storm water runoff (Melropolitan Council Smali Siles BMP Manual, 2001). Bioretention facilities capture rainwater runoff to be filtered through a prepared soil medium. Once the soil pore space capacity of the medium is exceeded, slormwater begins to pool at the surface of the planting soil. Pollutants are removed by a number of processes including adsorption, filtration, volatilization, ion exchange and decomposition (Prince George's County, Iv1D, 1993). Fillered runoff can either be allowed to infiltrate into the surrounding soH (functioning as an infiltration basin or rainwater garden), or collected by an under-drain system and discharged to the storm sewer system or directly to receiving waters (functioning like a surface sand filter). Runoff from larger storms is generally diverted past the area to the storm drain system (Metropolitan Council Small Sites BMP Manual, 200'1). Bioretention is a stormwater treatment practice that utilizes the chemical, biological and physical properties of plants, microbes and soils for capturing! reducing stormwater runoff and removing pollutants from runoff. This process is often incorporated rnlo many different types of filtration emd infiltration stormwater treatment practices. . - . --:7 fN Duration of Storm Event- Storaqe & fiUralion/infiltration Y' "" Following Storm Event- Remaini~9 s!ora~.!jraw-down * '.7 r~", Graphics Courtesy of Rice Creel< Wa,'erst')ed District Drain<~w: Areas' Dry VI/en,' Trench! 8a:,:n Max. Sile SiopG !vlin. Depth \0 Bedrock Min. Depth to Seasonally Hlgl. Water Table NRCS Soil Type -C.'-, 1".,-,,;.' ," j .~I'!I'"il"" illlFlil)'blH ,,,>C. I", ';",'..1 h "',~I""I"" ,1'''''';''r'''ll'ntCt'",l'''''J% Freeze! Thaw Suitability Description: In general terms, infiltration systems can be described as natural or constructed depressions located in permeable soils that capture, store and infiltrate stormwater runoff within 48 hours. These depressions can be located at the surface of the ground (e.g. infiltration basin) or they can be designed as underground facilities (e.g. structural chamber or excavated pit filled with aggregate such as an infiltration trench). Typically, infiltration systems are designed with one or more pre- treatment facilities or they are designed as off-line facilities. Infiltration systems should be located in permeable soils and a minimum 3-foot distance is REQUIRED from the bottom of the practice to the seasonally high water table, bedrock or other impeding layer per the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Construction Generai Permit (CGP). Dry wells and Trenches should be designed to handle the smaller, more frequent rainfall events. Stormwater associated with the larger rainfall events should bypass these practices by a separate pipe or an overflow device. Infiltration basins and underground infiltration systems should be designed to handie both the water quality volume and as the water quantity volume. Infiltration systems can be designed to address a number of stormwater management issues including: water quality, stormwater runoff reduction. flow attenuation, thermal impacts to cord water fisheries, and ground water recharge. Start of Storm Event. Initial runoff & Duration of Storm Event- Storage & flltrati~nfjnHltration ,",/ Following Storm Event- Remaining storage drav.:.down >I,' ;'i"\i.1 '_<: }\./" i [) , ;;Jt;r' :>f .... v*.'F"~.., .,' (,,\ 'T~t,+ (\ ~ PERVIOUS PAVEMENT G{asspave~)at Bradst"F8W Celebration of Life Center - Sri/fwater. MN Design Criteria: .. Pervious pavement is typically usee! in low traffic areas including overflow parking areas. emergency vehicle lanes, ..:lnrJ pedestr!<:Hl -areas. .... In-situ soils should have field-verified minimum permeability felles greatm than 113 jn./hr. Conlributln9 runoff from offslte should be limited to a 3:'1 T8tio of impervious area to pervious pclVernenl mea. .. The selected systems load bearing surfC1ce should be suited 10 maximum intendecl loads. .. Design storms should be infiltralfld win-un 48 hours. Benefits: JP. Good for hiQhly impervious areas '" parlicularly parking tots. II> Reduces need fDr other storm water SNIPs by reducinfj runoff ... (;onslruction costs of some systems ::IrE! less than Imditional paving. ,.. SOfl-enh8nced turf systems resfsl compaction, increase infiltration, and provide -soils for healthier vegetation. limitations: ".. Construction costs of 5QITW .systems are more expensive than trc1cJifional pewinD j>J- Use depends on infiltration rales of underlyinq soils ~ Maintenance costs are higher lhar~ conventional paving. ,.. Not recommended for lligh iraffjc cH8as because of clurabiiity concerns Definition: Pervious pavements reduce the amount of runoff by allowing w8ter to pass through surfaces that would othePJlJise be impervious. VI/ater can either infiltrate into the ground, jf soH permeability rates al!m'IJ, or be conveyed to other BMPs or a storm water system by an under-drain. Waler Quafity (V w,J Channel Protection (V.:::,) Overbonk Flood Protection {V , ~(,) Extreme Flood Protection (V '-"ir.'} Recharge Velurne {Re.) - Infillralion ,'.,:T1 "I1PIO\,",1"; ;,[;, ~:I'''~''r;~" Screening/ Fillmtion T emperalurH Control SeWing Evaporation T ransplr~ltion ',r "{'~(,:"':<ln ". SoH Adsorplion Biologic all Micro. Uptake ,'u:.j(,_"",.....l'. (tr[l""Ojle.'P"Cj""'lJ"ICl11c"t Nutrients ~ To~al PhosphofllS1 Total Nitr o9fm - Cadmium, Copper, L1-J::ld. and Zinc Pathcg8ns - Coliform, Streptococci, E. Cai, r oxins.. Chloride, HvdrOG8rhons, Pe.s\icid~s' Dr;w \8ge !\fl',:~ f.Il;IX. Slope Min. Depth Ie, Bedrock Min. Depth to W,-lter Table SCS Soil iype "',"1"",,.<,,',,:;;'-' ",d;' n;:'1':L':,' Fr~~8zci Thaw SUil~'lbility ",",, ';~"'!-." Ill' ',liO"F"'~ . Potentlcll Hotspot Runoff FhhW' m'''''''k'"hlel.",,;',:),.,-.i,h.- :"""'5';('; Description: Pervious pavements can be subdivided into three general categories: 1) Porous Pavements - porous surfaces that infiltrate water across the entire surface (i.e. porous asphalt and porous concrete pavements); 2) Permeable Pavers ~ impermeable modular blocks or grids separated by spaces or joints that water drains through (i.e. block pavers, piaslic grids, etc.): 3) Amended Soils - Fiber or artificial media added to soH 10 maintain soil structure and prevent compaction. There are many different types of modular porous pavers available from different manufacturers. Pervious pavement systems reduce runoff from impervious surfaces by allowing storm water to pass through the load bearing surface and infill that are selected based upon the intended application and required infiltration. rate. Runoff is stored in the stone aggregate base course! storage layer, jf present, and allowed to infiltrate into the surrounding soil (functioning like an infiltration basin), or col!ected by an under-drain system and discharged to the storm sewer system or directly to receiving waters (functioning like a surface sand filter). Regular mainlenance of pervious pavements is necessary to ensure long-term effectiveness. Annual or semi-annual sweeping or vacuuming of surface debris (litter, sediment, etc.) is STRONGLY RECOMMENDED for pavement or pavers_ If clogging occurs, the filtration media below the surface may need to be replaced. Manufacturers should be consulted for specific maintenance requirements. Currently, the MPCA will allow site designers to reduce the water quality volume Sizing when using pervious pavement, up Lo a maximum of Y;, acre of new impervious surface. The MPCA will not allow perviolls pavements as 8 rep~Clcement for water quality treatment BMPs, such as infiltration or filtration practices. Start of Storm Event. Initial runoff & storage "' Duration of Storm Event- & filtration/infiltration Storm MUNICIPAL PRACTICES Definition: Munidpal pollution prelJention practices EIre public operation clnd mainlencUlce activities and educational efforts implemented by municipal staff thc.=lt prevent or reduce ~he coni ami nation o-~ slorm\Na!er. Saft delivery to a Washingfon County Salt Shed Description: Municipal pollution prevention practices prevent or reduce storrmNater contamination frorn public 50LHces slIch as slreets, parking areas, maintenance vehicles, slorm and sanitary .sewers, dumpsters, swimmIng pools cmd other potential stormwater hotspots. These pracHces improve subwatershed ...vater Quality bV minimizing the introduclion of poliulants induding sediment, nutrients, metals, bacteria, trash. oJ!, and toxins. Each of these practices is highly suitable amj effective in cold climates. Table 12.PREV.3 indicates the pollutants controHed by various municipal pollution prevention practices \'Jhile Table 12.PREV4 describes some of the methods used for each of these pmclices. See Chapter 13 for further dis.cussion of potential stormwater hotspots. See Photo Credits and References. for further infonn~tion. Praclice. Stormw-ater Pollutants Coniroll~d Sediment Nutrients Metals femp, Conslruction SudirnDnl CL'plfol cl c o Wind Erosloll Conlrol c.) (~ o o e '" It e SI,\bili;::,1-!ioll @> '" .lnrll,mdfill Manag8menr '\il;:U\iJ~Jp.lm~nl " Streel ,Jf){) Pfl(king Lol D"iclnD l> <II o '-" and Animol W<'!ste Gonlml Sfilll ami Employee EcillG<J!ion o ::.0 UnC\)nlrolh~[1 () ,,: fo..lod~~r,-"t"lj Conlrol1Br.! c' ConlrolierJ .' Conuo!l/;il ! r Temporary Construction Sediment Control Wind Erosion Controi Emission Regulation Foilow iocal. state, and fedemi reguiatory requirements for control of erosion during construction activities. Institute a local program for wetting of open construction surfaces and other sources for windblown poilutants. Follow local, state, and federai regulatory requirements for control of air emissions. Reduce or eliminate spili and leakage loss by property inspecting, containing, and storing hazardous materials and having a cleanup plan that can be quickly and efficiently implemented. Follow NPDES Industrial Permit requirements if permit authority applies. Ensure that contaminated material is contained to prevent solid and/or liquid waste from being washed into storm sewer systems or water bodies. Ensure that mowin9, fertilization, pesticide application, and irrigation are completed in ways that will prevent or reduce grass clippings, sediment, and chemicals from entering storm sewer systems; use native vegetation where possibie. Maintain parking lots frequently and especially in the spring and fall by sweeping, pickin9 up litter, and repairing deterioration; pressure wash pavement only as needed and minimize the use of cleaning agents. Reduce or eliminate the need for deicing products by manually clearing sidewalks, driveways, and parking lots prior to deicer use; use environmentally-friendiy deicing products when possible, apply sparingly and store properly if used. Ensure that vehicles are fueled, maintained, washed and stored in a manner that prevents the reiease of harmfui fluids, including oil, antifreeze, gasoline, battery acid, hydraulic and transmission fluids, and cleaning solutions. Regularly clean debris from storm sewer inlets, remove sediment from catch basin sumps, and remove any illicit connections to storm sewer systems. Regularly inspect and fiush sanitary pipes to ensure that there are no leaks in the system and that the system is functioning properly Material Storage Control Dumpster and Landfill Management Better Turf Management Better Parking Lot Cleaning Better Impervious Surface Deicing Proper Vehicle Management Storm Sewer System Maintenance Sanitary Sewer System Maintenance 2 StHlwDler. MN Design Criteria (for new construction): .. Irregularly shaped with minimum length 10 width ratio of 1.5:1 .... Permanent pool volume of 'I BOO cubic feet per acre draining to pond. .... Permanent pool depth 3' minimum,-JO. maximum at deepest points .... Extended detention (ED) storage sufficient to treat VWQ .... Pre-treatment required (sediment forebay sized at 10% of pond area recommended) .... Stabilized emergency overflow and energy dissipation at all outlets .. Side slopes not to exceed 1 V:3H Benefits: .... Able to effectively reeluce m8ny pOllutant loads and control runoff flow rates .. Relatively straightforvvard design procedure .... Potential wildlife habitat and aesthetic or recreational enhancement .... May be used as temporary sedimentation basin during construction Limitations: ~ Relatively large space requirement ~ Tends to increase water temperature and may cause downstream thermal impact tv- Potential for nuisance insects or odor ~ Problematic for areas of low relief, high water table, or near-surface bedrock ~ Possible safety concerns Definition: A construclecl basin situated to receive loczl stormwaler runoff and hold clesignated volumes of yunot! for specified periods of time. The objectives are to improve water quaiity through settling and biological uptake, and prevent downstream channel degradation or flood damage through storage and outflow rate reduction. Water Quality (V wo) Channel Protection (VCP) Overbank Flood Protection (V :>1) Extreme Flood Protection tV PIOn) Recharge Volume (VRE) Screening! Filtration Temperature Control Selliing Transpiration Soil Adsorption (lil'/lile'!} Biological/ Micro. Uplake T olal Suspended Solids Nutrienls - Total Phosphorusl Total NHrogen Melals - Cadmium, Copper, Lead, and Zinc Pathogens - Coliform, Streptococci, E. Coli Toxins Chloride, Hydrocnrbon, Pesticide Drainage Area ")1; lle ,I h~'" logy ~p!ibh:- ,,! ',,,npllo: 'lg ..,,,1,.. Max. Site Slope Min. Depth iO Bedrock '"2 II "; !-'~~H ",,"'~ Min. Depth to Se8sonally High Water Table 'pon(!tldtilJ",,,,.,sJi)"<lI'n-":t>t!,hor:!<. NRCS Soil Type 'A'It1(!llsr,,\,:.re'lI.H""ltlerS Freezel Thaw Suitability ''It,il'5'''i)(J<1pl,,d>,n'lt,;,I,I<ti'''''',:;I'''''lJO !~" ~"r)'"mnll Description: Stormwater ponds are constructed basins placed in- the landscape to capture stormwater runoff. The pond is graded and outlet structures are designed in such a way that specified volumes of water (part or all of the VWQ' VCP, VpHJ' and Vpl~llJ are either held unlil displaced by future runoff or detained for a specified period of time. While the runoff is being held in the pond, sediment and associated pollutants settle to the bottom. Pollutants can also be removed from the stormwater through microbial, plant and algat biological uptake. Additional stormwater pond storage provided above the V wa allocation is used to control flows of particular frequencies at pre-development or other specified levels to prevent downstream channel degradation and flood damage. Storage in a stormwater pond can be either permanent pool or extended detention storage. As the name implies, water in the permanent pool is meant to remain in the basin, allowing settling and biological uptake to occur between storms and protecting against sediment resuspension, To maintain a permanent pool over a period of time, the pond must be designed with a sufficienlly large drainage area. Extended detention storage refers to the volume above the permanent pool which is controlled by an outlet structure, sized so that runoff from larger storms can be captured and released over a period of lime, allowing some settling to occur and keeping flow rates in check. Ponding requirements for new impervious area treatment me mandated in the state Construction General Permit (CGP). It is possible to design a pond with no permanent pool (dry pond, ponded only for a maximum of several days following a storm event), but stormwater ponds used for weter quality treatment should be designed with a permanent pool. Dry ponds are highly susceptible to sediment ",suspenSion andgenllrally do not me.et waler quality performance criieria, However, dry ponds can be employed insomB circumstances, such as for supplemental storage when the Vwnhas already been treated with upstream BMPs. Sediment and pollutant removal in stormwater ponds can be enhanced through the use of multiple cells in succession. In particular, a sediment fore bay (pre- treatment basin) sized at 10% of the pond area should be considered upstream of the pond, This allows for settling of heavier materials in a designated area, enhancing the main pond performance and reducing the maintenance burden by concentrating the majority of sediments in one location. It is also possible to design a pond with no extended detllnlion slorage (wet pond), in which the only outlet is the spillway and where 1fJO% Of the treated VQlumeis wilhin the pem1anent pool. When a storm occurs, the treated runoff in the pond is displaced by new (untreated) runoff. Wel ponds are able 10 fulfill water qualily !reall'llenl requirements, but do not mltigale thll channel degradation or flooding effects of increased fiO\'! from iarger storms, Also, wet pondS are not generally recommended for cold climates because during frozen conditions, runoff can now over the ice of the permanent pool, effectively negating the benefits of the intended treatment volume. Generally the most desirable pond configuration for Minnesota is a large enough permanent pool to meet water quality needs, and suffident extended detention to ensure adequate treatment during frozen conditions. Northwestern College Master Plan Northwestern College Roseville and Arden Hills, Minnesota Traffic and Parking Impact Study TKDA Submitted: Revised: Revised: Project No. ENGINEERS. ARCHITECTS' PLANNERS November 15, 2006 January 18, 2007 April 24, 2007 13529.000 444 Cedar Street. Suite 1500 Saint Paul. MN 55101-2140 (651)292-4400 (651) 292-0083 Fax www.tkda.com NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE MASTER PLAN TRAFFIC AND PARKING IMPACT STUDY TKDA PROJECT NO. 13529.000 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO. I. INTRODUCTION ________. __. __ ____________. __.__________... __ __.... ____.. __________..__ __.____.__.__.________________________. .__. 1 II. BACKGROUND .__ ______. ______. ..__.____. ..... __.__.__ ____. ____... __. __. ____. ____.. __. __.... __ .__...__ .__........ .__....________..1 III. LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINED ......____.______.__.__...______..__.__....__...____....................____...__....______2 IV. EXISTING CONDITIONS .............__.______...... ...__..... ...__. ...... .... ... ...... .......................... ............ 3 A. Existing Traffic Operations ____.______________..__.__..____.____..__.__..______.....__________.__.____________________ 3 B. Existing Parking Capacity...... ......__.... ...... .... ... ...... ... ..... .... ...... .... ...............__................. 6 V. Year 2018 Background Conditions .......__....................................__........................__.__...........8 VI. Year 2018 Cumulative Conditions ......____________.__.________________.________.__.__.______..____......__....__.____.10 A. Future Campus Expansion Trip Generation and Distribution..__.__...____.......................11 B. Year 2018 Cumulative Traffic Operating Conditions .______.____.____..________...__....__.______.____13 C. Recommended Transportation Mitigation Measures__...______..__.____.__.____.____.__.__..________.16 VII. YEAR 2026 CUMULATIVE CONDITIONS __.__.______.__.__.__.____.________.____..________..______....__....____.19 A. Year 2026 Cumulative Traffic Operating Conditions __.__.______..____...____.__..__....____.________. 19 B. Year 2026 Parking Conditions................__..____......__...........__...............____.....__...__........23 VIII. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ________..____.____...__...__.____________.__.__.....________....________...________.25 APPENDIX PAGES HCM Level of Service Reports.__.......__.__....__.__.____.............__.____....__.......__.__........ ........................42 LIST OF TABLES PAGE NO. Table No.1: Existing Levels of Service and Average Vehicle Delays .__.____.__.______.____.______________.5 Table No.2: Year 2018 Background Levels of Service and Average Vehicle Delays ..____.______..9 Table No.3: Estimated College Master Plan Trip Distribution____.__.____________________________....________.15 Table No.4: Year 2018 Levels of Service and Average Vehicle Delays with No Roadway Improvements__...____..__.____...............__...__..__________..____.__..__________15 Northwestern College Master Plan Traffic and Parking Impact Study 13529.000 Table NO.5: Year 2018 Peak Hour LOS, Average Delay, and Vehicle Queues with and without Mitigation .______________......__..____.......____.....__...______________________.______.__ 18 Table NO.6: Year 2026 Cumulative Levels of Service and Average Vehicle Delays __.__...______22 LIST OF FIGURES PAGES Figure NO.1: Existing AM and PM Peak Hour Turn Volumes ..____.__________.________________________________.__.4 Figure NO.2: Year 2018 Background AM and PM Peak Turn Volumes ______...__________________...__...__10 Figure NO.3: Net Campus Master Plan AM and PM Peak Trips (2018 Buildout)________....__________. 12 Figure NO.4: Year 2018 Cumulative AM and PM Peak Trips......____________.....____...__________...__________14 Figure NO.5: Year 2026 Cumulative AM and PM Peak Trips.________________________.__.__________.______.______21 LIST OF CHARTS PAGE NO. Chart NO.1: Existing Parking Demand vs. Capacity (April 2006) __...________.__.____.______________...__........ 7 Chart NO.2: Year 2026 Projected Parking Demand vs. Supply ____.__....________________..____.____.__________24 Northwestern College Master Plan Traffic and Parking Impact Study ii 13529.000 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE MASTER PLAN TRAFFIC AND PARKING IMPACT STUDY I. INTRODUCTION Founded in 1902 as the Northwestern Bible and Missionary School, Northwestern College is a private, non-denominational Christian College. Northwestern's academic program offers 45 bachelor degrees ranging from elementary education and pastoral studies to broadcasting/electronic media and psychology. In 1949, the College broadened its focus when Twin Cities' radio station KTIS went on the air. Below is an image of the campus as it appears today. ~c~~. Yvf.~ ~~~ tJ~~..k ?; .~ " -'N- SNEL.t.!NG TERRACE SOUnfEAST II. BACKGROUND The purpose of this Study is to identify the potential traffic and parking impacts of the proposed Northwestern College Campus Master Plan expansion. Traffic and parking analyses were conducted for Existing Conditions, Year 2018 Background Conditions (without Master Plan construction), and Year 2018 Cumulative Conditions (with College Master Plan buildout). Needed roadway improvements are sU9gested for 2026 Background Conditions and potential College Master Plan mitigation measures are recommended. Northwestern College Master Plan Traffic and Parking Impact Study 13529.000 III. LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINED Future traffic operations are analyzed in this Study in terms of levels of service. Level of service (LOS) is an estimate of the quality and performance of transportation facility operations. Methodology outlined in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) is commonly used to determine LOS. (This analysis used Synchro signal timing software to model the study intersections with HCM LOS methodology). The degree of traffic congestion and delay is rated using the letter "A" for the least amount of congestion to the letter "F" for the highest congestion level (i.e., LOS A through LOS F). The following categories provide general descriptions of the different levels of service defined in the HCM: . LOS A represents a free-flow condition. Travel speeds are at or near the speed limit and little to no delay exists. Freedom to select desired speeds and to make turns and maneuver within the traffic stream is very high. Average delays experienced at unsignalized or signalized intersections are less than 10 seconds per vehicle. . LOS B represents a zone of stable flow. Drivers still have reasonable freedom to select their travel speeds. Minor average delays of 10 to 15 seconds per vehicle are experienced at unsignalized intersections, and from 10 to 20 seconds per vehicle for signalized intersections. . LOS C still falls within the zone of stable flow, but travel speeds and vehicle maneuverability are more closely controlled by the higher volumes. The selection of speed is not affected by the presence of other vehicles, and maneuvering within the traffic stream requires vigilance by the driver. Average delays of 15 to 25 seconds per vehicle are experienced at unsignalized intersections and from 20 to 35 seconds for signalized intersections. . LOS D approaches unstable flow. Travel speed and freedom to maneuver are somewhat restricted, with average delays of 25 to 35 seconds per vehicle at unsignalized intersections and from 35 to 55 seconds for signalized intersections. Small increases in traffic flow can cause operational difficulties at this level. Northwestern College Master Plan Traffic and Parking Impact Study 2 13529.000 . LOS E represents operating conditions at or near the capacity of the intersection. Average delays of 35 to 50 seconds per vehicle are experienced at unsignalized intersections and from 55 to 80 seconds at signalized intersections. Freedom to maneuver within the traffic stream is very difficult. Any incident can be expected to produce a breakdown in traffic flow with extensive queuing. . LOS F describes forced flow operation at very low speeds. Operations are characterized by stop-and-go traffic. Long average delays of more than 50 seconds per vehicle occur at unsignalized intersections and of more than 80 seconds per vehicle at signalized intersections. Though there are no hard and fast guidelines in Minnesota for what level of service is considered acceptable, it is typical for an intersection with an overall LOS C to be considered acceptable in rural areas and for an overall LOS D to be acceptable in more urban or developing areas. IV. EXISTING CONDITIONS A. Existino Traffic ODerations Turn movement counts for the a.m. and p.m. peak hours were taken in May 2006 and then adjusted for seasonal variation. The resulting a.m. and p.m. peak hour turn volumes are shown in Figure 1. Existing a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic conditions were modeled using SynchrolSimTraffic simulation software. The resulting a.m. and p.m. peak hour levels of service and average vehicle delays for the four study intersections are shown in Table 1. Northwestern College Master Plan Traffic and Parking Impact Study 3 13529.000 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE FIGURE 1. EXISTING AM AND PM PEAK HOUR TURN VOLUMES t (25) AM PEAK TURN VOLUMES ~ 25 PM PEAK TURN VOLUMES r 14i><I~_'<!.I<fX>-{2QN?! Table No.1: Existing Levels of Service and Average Vehicle Delays Overall LOS/Average Delay (seconds) Worst Approach LOS/Delay (seconds) Lydia Ave/College Entrance Overall LOS/Average Delay (seconds) Worst Approach LOS/Delay (seconds) Snelling Ave/Lydia Ave Overall LOS/Average Delay (seconds) Worst Approach LOS/Delay (seconds) Snelling Ave/County Road C-2 Overall LOS/Average Delay (seconds) B -13 D-45 Worst Approach LOS/Delay (seconds) EB - E - 66 EB - F - 97 All study intersections currently operate at acceptable levels of service overall (I.e., LOS D or better) in both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. However, several intersection approaches currently operate below LOS D, including the southbound approach at Lydia Avenue/College Entrance/Lincoln Drive and eastbound approach at Snelling Avenue/County Road C-2 which operate at LOS F during the p.m. peak hour. Vehicles exiting the campus gate in the p.m. peak hour experience about 61 seconds delay on average due to limited gaps in the east-west traffic flow on Lydia Avenue during that period. Also operating below LOS D are the eastbound and westbound approaches of Snelling/Lydia (LOS E in the a.m. and p.m. peak hours, respectively) and the eastbound approach at Snelling/County Road C-2 (LOS E and LOS F in the a.m. and p.m. peak hour, respectively). The existing sight lines at the Lydia Avenue/College entrance/Lincoln Drive intersection are not sufficient for drivers exiting campus to safely perceive oncoming Northwestern College Master Plan Traffic and Parking Impact Study 5 13529.000 traffic from either direction; this is due to the presence of trees and brush on campus property to the east and west of the main gate entrance, and an earthen berm obscuring sight lines to the east. B. Existina Parkina Caoacitv Currently there are about 1,400 parking spaces on the Northwestern College campus north of Lydia Avenue. Estimates of peak parking demand were made based on hourly vehicle counts collected via the 48-hour traffic tube counts taken in April 2006. Chart No. 1 depicts the hourly parked vehicle totals versus the overall parking capacity of 1,400 spaces. Peak demand is estimated to occur between 12:15 and 12:30 p.m. on a typical weekday and consists of about 1,365 parked vehicles, or 97% of parking capacity. Northwestern College Master Plan Traffic and Parking Impact Study 6 13529.000 1 g" "in.. 0 0 0 g" oi (.jn.. N "' '" ~ j g" <-i0- g" I <-ill.. j g" No.. g" CO .;..:0- 0 0 N ';: g" " a. .;...;a. . ~ 0 . ~ "' >- rn ~ C 0 " " ~~ :;; to ~a. a. a. .. .. to "0 tl >- ~ t 0 iii 0 z > <?:~ " ~a. . .... t:: "tl "0 c: :c to . to > ..c: E ~ tl 0 f '" <;'J::2 :;; Cl ;::'" a. Cl I c: :i! ~ 0 to 9::2 D- ;::'" Cl c: :;::; Ul ~:2 .;( :e'" w 0 <?::2; :e'" e g" "'>- ;;:"0 Cri<( ~-" ~U) "'U '" '" 20. g" W E Cri<( "'- W'" :g .~ o~ e'" ~ll. g" ~"O 0:5<( "' e w'" " " -"", 5~ g" Zf- ici<( 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ :; ~ :e ro ro ~ ~ sal:)!~a^ pa)fJed v. YEAR 2018 BACKGROUND CONDITIONS Year 2018 Background conditions are the projected traffic conditions without including traffic generated from campus expansion. Future traffic projections were based on historic growth trends in traffic volumes along study area roadways. The assumed growth rates ranged from 0.59% per year on Lydia Avenue west of Snelling Avenue to 1.31 % per year on Lydia Avenue east of Snelling Avenue. Average annual growth on Snelling Avenue was assumed to be 1.04% based on an average of growth rates observed on Snelling Avenue north and south of the study area. These growth rates were applied to 2006 turn movement volumes to derive Year 2018 Background peak hour turn volumes shown in Figure 2. Year 2018 background levels of service and average vehicle delays are shown in Table 2. By Year 2018 overall intersection operating conditions at Snelling Avenue/Lydia Avenue will drop to LOS E and F, respectively, in the a.m. and p.m. peak hours due to rapid growth in background traffic levels. Snellng Avenue/County Road C-2 will drop to LOS E during the p.m. peak hour. All other study intersections will continue to operate at the same as existing levels of service during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Northwestern College Master Plan Traffic and Parking Impact Study 8 13529.000 Table No.2: Year 2018 Background Levels of Service and Average Vehicle Delays Fairview Ave/Lydia Ave Overall LOS/Average Delay (seconds) Worst Approach LOS/Delay (seconds) Lydia Ave/College Entrance Overall LOS/Average Delay (seconds) Worst Approach LOS/Delay (seconds) Snelling Ave/Lydia Ave Overall LOS/Average Delay (seconds) Worst Approach LOS/Delay (seconds) Snelling Ave/County Road C-2 Overall LOS/Average Delay (seconds) Worst Approach LOS/Delay (seconds) Northwestern College Master Plan T raffle and Parking Impact Study 2018 Background Conditions 8-13 D-45 8-10 E -64 EB - E - 66 EB - F - 97 WB-E-63 NB-F-100 9 13529.000 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE FIGURE 2. YEAR 2018 BACKGROUND AM AND PM PEAK TURN VOLUMES t (25) AM PEAK TURN VOLUMES ~ 25 PM PEAK TURN VOLUMES r M,-,pr;!ole,Ap..;12G.2fXil VI. YEAR 2018 CUMULATIVE CONDITIONS A. Future Campus Expansion Trip Generation and Distribution Year 2018 Cumulative Conditions represent projected traffic operations with background growth and campus expansion. Future trip generation due to campus expansion and corresponding increases in student enrollment, faculty, and staff, was estimated for the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. These estimates were based on existing hour-by-hour gate counts taken in April 2006 which were used to calculate the current rate of peak hour trips per total commuter students, faculty and staff. This calculated rate was then applied to the projected future year commuter student, faculty, and staff populations to derive trip generation totals. Incoming and outgoing trips were determined based on the two-directional gate count data. The total net increases in campus-related turn volumes at Master Plan buildout are shown in Figure NO.3. Northwestern College Master Plan Traffic and Parking Impact Study 11 13529.000 NORTHINESTERN COLLEGE FIGURE 3. NET CAMPUS MASTER PLAN AM AND PM PEAK TRIPS (2018 BUILDOUT) t (25) AM PEAK TURN VOLUMES ~ 25 PM PEAK TURN VOLUMES r /lap 0,*, .~"",.i?O. ;co.)! A net increase of 238 a.m. peak hour trips and 365 p.m. peak hour trips are anticipated from campus expansion at buildout. The distribution of campus-generated trips was estimated based on existing commuter student, faculty and staff residential zip codes. Estimated distribution percentages for commuter students and college faculty and staff are shown in Table 3. B. Year 2018 Cumulative Traffic Operatinq Conditions Estimated Year 2018 cumulative traffic turn volumes are shown in Figure 4. The results of the future traffic analysis with campus expansion and no roadway improvements are summarized in Table 4. The net differences between 2018 Cumulative Conditions and 2018 Background Conditions represents the impact of the Northwestern College Campus Expansion. As shown in Table 4, the most significant impacts of the expansion are projected to occur at Fairview Avenue/Lydia Avenue and at the College entrance at the intersection with Lydia Avenue and Lincoln Drive. At Fairview Avenue/Lydia Avenue future p.m. peak hour traffic operations would fall to LOS D overall, and the southbound approach would drop to LOS E in part due to campus-generated traffic moving through the intersection. At Lydia Avenue/College entrance overall operations would fall to LOS F with the southbound (College outbound) approach operations falling to LOS F with nearly eight minutes of delay per vehicle. The Snelling Avenue intersections could be expected to operate about the same in 2018, with or without the college expansion. Northwestern College Master Plan T raffie and Parking Impact Study 13 13529.000 NORTHWESTERN COLLEGE FIGURE 4. YEAR 2018 CUMULATIVE AM AND PM PEAK TRIPS t (25) AM PEAK TURN VOLUMES ~ 25 PM PEAK TURN VOLUMES r Ma;><>a:"'-.)ojl(il?O,WQ7 Table No.3: Estimated College Master Plan Trip Distribution Lydia Fairview Ave Snellin Ave 1-35W Ave CR-C-2 Co. Rd. C North South North South North South East East East West Total Commuter Students 5.4% 8.3% 15.7% 31.4% 24.1% 5.6% 4.4% 1.4% 2.3% 1.4% 100.00% 7.2% 6.8% 15.3% 22.6% 26.9% 5.1% 9.9% 2.2% 2.4% 1.6% 100.00% Table No.4: Year 2018 Levels of Service and .Average Vehicle Delays with No Roadway Improvements 2018 Background Conditions AM Peak PM Peak Hour Hour Fairview AvelLydia Ave Overall LOS/Average Delay (seconds) Worst Approach LOS/Delay (seconds) Lydia Ave/College Entrance Overall LOS/Average Delay (seconds) Worst Approach LOS/Delay (seconds) Snelling AvelLydia Ave Overall LOS/Average Delay (seconds) Worst Approach LOS/Delay (seconds) Snelling Ave/County Road C-2 Overall LOS/Average Delay (seconds) Worst Approach LOS/Delay (seconds) B-10 E -64 B-11 E-64 WB-E-63 NB-F-100 WB-E-64 NB-F-100 Northwestern College Master Plan Traffic and Parking Impact Study 15 13529.000 C. Recommended Transportation Mitioation Measures To improve operating conditions under Year 2018 Cumulative Conditions (i.e., Campus Master Plan full buildout case) several transportation system improvements will be required. While many of these measures are needed as a result of future background traffic alone, future increases in College-related traffic will also contribute to the traffic conditions requiring mitigation. There is currently no public funding identified in either the County or City Capital Improvement Plans for any of the recommended improvements. It is recommended that the College will participate in funding the following mitigation measures to a level proportionate to the amount of traffic added to the public system as a result of the campus expansion. The proportion will be defined based on the campus expansion-generated trip movements (shown in Figure 3) divided by future year total cumulative trip movements through the intersection or street section to be improved (as shown in Figure 4 for Year 2018). The following mitigation measures are recommended to improve Year 2018 peak hour traffic operations: 1. Implementing a traffic signal at Fairview Avenue/Lydia Avenue with an exclusive southbound left turn lane of 250 feet. 2. Directing outbound right turns and inbound left turns to and from the west via the Northwestern College west gate during the p.m. peak hour and adding an eastbound 150-foot left turn lane at the west gate and appropriate berming on the south side of the intersection to accommodate inbound left turns from the west and to mitigate potential impacts from car headlights to residential properties to the south. 3. Adding an exclusive 150-foot westbound right turn lane at Lydia/College entrance to facilitate safe maneuvers for college-bound vehicles (the College should dedicate the right-of-way required on the north side of Lydia Avenue to accommodate the new lane). 4. One additional exclusive eastbound left turn lane at Snelling Avenue/Lydia Avenue with left turn lanes extended to 200 feet (the College should dedicate Northwestern College Master Plan T ra!fie and Parking Impact Study 16 13529.000 the right-of-way required on either side of Lydia Avenue to accommodate the new lanes). 5. One additional exclusive eastbound left turn lane at Snelling Avenue/County Road C-2 with left turn lanes extended to 200 feet. 6. Develop Travel Demand Management (TDM) Plan to implement institutional measures that would further improve future peak hour traffic operations. Table 5 shows Year 2018 performance measures under background, cumulative, and mitigated cumulative conditions. With the physical mitigation measures in place (measures one through five above), traffic operations would improve significantly at the Lydia Avenue/Fairview Avenue and Lydia Avenue/College entrance intersections. At Lydia/Fairview overall operating conditions would improve from LOS D to LOS B in the p.m. peak hour and at Lydia/College entrance the overall intersection improves from LOS F to LOS B: the southbound approach for vehicles exiting campus would continue to operate at LOS F, but at a much reduced average delay of only 51 seconds, just beyond the LOS E threshold of 50 seconds. At Snelling Avenue/Lydia Avenue traffic operations would remain at LOS E for the a.m. and p.m. peak hours, even after the recommended physical mitigation measures have been implemented. In addition, the SimTraffic analysis shows very long northbound and southbound queues occurring at the Snelling/Lydia and Snelling/CR C-2 intersections for all 2018 scenarios. While the northbound p.m. peak hour queue at Snelling/CR C-2 may be somewhat overstated (due to the fact that Snelling/CR C intersection was not modeled and in reality would meter the northbound flow and result in shorter queues at CR C-2) there are no reasonable mitigation measures available short of constructing grade-separated interchanges that would improve Snelling Avenue corridor operations. This high-cost and high-impact improvement was not included in the traffic analysis as it was not considered to be a financially- feasible or politically-viable solution. Northwestern College Master Plan Traffic and Parking Impact Study 17 13529.000 Table No.5: Year 2018 Peak Hour LOS, Average Delay, and Vehicle Queues with and without Mitigation 2018 Background 2018 Cumulative 2018 Cumulative Conditions Conditions Conditions with Miti alian 1 HCM lOS/Average Delay HCM lOS/Average Delay AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak Hour Hour Hour Hour Overall LOS/Average Delay (seconds) B-15 C-20 C.18 D-35 B-17 B -14 Worst Approach LOS/Delay (seconds) SB. C.16 NB-C-23 SB-C-22 SB- E-41 WB-C-33 WB-D.38 SimTraffic Max. Queue (feet) SB - 230 SB - 455 SB . 230 NB . 467 WB - 220 SB-310 SimTraffic Worst Avg. Queue (feet) SB .125 SB-175 SB.120 SB-196 WB-134 NB-142 Lydia Ave/College Entrance Overall LOS/Average Delay (seconds) A-3 B-18 A-6 F -150 A-3 B -15 Worst Approach LOS/Delay (seconds) SB-C-18 SB- F -61 NB-E-39 SB-F-465 NB-C-20 SB-F-51 SimTraffic Max. Queue (feet) SB-52 SB - 265 EB .140 SB - 1455 SB-65 SB . 260 SimTraffic Worst Avg. Queue (feet) SB-20 SB-80 EB -46 SB - 890 NB -22 5B-100 Snelling Ave/Lydia Ave Overall LOS/Average Delay (seconds) E-55 F - 90 E-55 F -87 E - 55 E -71 Worst Approach LOS/Delay (seconds) SB - E . 70 NB-F-124 SB - E - 69 WB-F-142 5B-E-69 NB-F-92 SimTraffic Max. Queue (feet) SB - 4250 NB -1255 SB - 4240 NB -1250 SB - 4230 NB - 1240 SimTraffic Worst Avg. Queue (feet) SB . 3830 NB-1010 SB - 3600 NB .1000 SB - 3790 NB-1140 Snelling Ave/County Road C-2 Overall LOS/Average Delay (seconds) B-10 E-64 B-11 E-64 B-12 D-38 Worst Approach LOS/Delay (seconds) WB-E-63 NB-F-100 WB-E-64 NB - F - 100 EB-E-67 WB-F-98 SimTraffic Max. Queue (feet) NB - 260 NB - 2490 NB - 260 NB . 2470 NB - 300 NB . 2480 SimTraffic Worst Avg. Queue (feet) NB.130 NB - 2400 NB-150 NB - 2440 NB-170 NB . 2420 Assumed transportation mitigation improvements include: 1) adding a second eastbound exclusive left turn lane at Snelling/Lydia with left turn lanes extended to 200 feet; 2) adding a second eastbound left turn lane at Snelling/CR C-2 with left turn lanes extended to 200 feet; 3) directing outbound right and inbound left turns to/from the west via the College west gate during the p.m. peak period; and 4) adding an exclusive 150-foot westbound right turn lane at Lydia Ave/Lincoln Drive (College main gate); 5) adding new signal at Lydia Ave/FailView Ave with exclusive southbound 150-foot left turn lane. Northwestern College Master Plan Traffic and Parking Impact Study 18 13529.000 Through the development and implementation of the TDM Plan recommended above, further reductions in average delay and queuing at the Lydia Avenue/College entrance, and other study intersections, could be achieved. Examples of some promising measures include: 1. Instituting staggered class hours during the p.m. peak period (4:00 to 6:00 p.m.) and 2. Delaying the start times for the adult evening classes. The full benefit of these TDM measures would require further analysis beyond the scope of this Study, but it is plausible that the resulting benefits could offset the need to direct traffic via the west gate during the p.m. peak hour. VII. YEAR 2026 CUMULATIVE CONDITIONS A. Year 2026 Cumulative Traffic Ooeratina Conditions A Year 2026 cumulative conditions scenario was analyzed in addition to the Year 2018 scenarios. Year 2026 cumulative traffic volumes were derived by applying the same annual percentage growth rates applied previously and adding potential peak hour trips from anticipated development in the area to Year 2018 cumulative traffic volumes. Applications for the previously proposed Twin Lakes mixed use development (between County Roads C and C-2 and between Fairview and Lincoln Avenues) have been denied by the City of Roseville, but potential peak hour trips from the project were included in the calculation of 2026 volumes as an example of what ultimately could be developed in this area. That development was expected to generate a net increase of 4,040 a.m. and 6,250 p.m. peak hour trips by Year 2020. These trips were distributed to the modeled roadway network based on the distribution assumed in the Twin Lakes Alternative Urban Area Review Traffic Study. Year 2026 conditions assumed the transportation system mitigation measures recommended for improving 2018 cumulative conditions. Estimated Year 2026 cumulative traffic turn volumes are shown in Figure NO.5. The results of the future traffic analysis are summarized in Table NO.6. By 2026 all study intersections will have overall or approach levels of service at LOS E or F, with the exception of Fairview Avenue/Lydia Avenue and Lydia Avenue/College entrance in Northwestern College Master Plan Traffic and Parking Impact Study 19 13529.000 the a.m. peak hour. The Snelling Avenue/Lydia Avenue intersection is projected to operate at LOS F in both peak hours and the Snelling/Avenue/County Road C-2 intersection is projected to operate at LOS E in both peak hours. There are no reasonable mitigation measures available short of constructing grade-separated interchanges that would improve these Snelling Avenue intersections. This high-cost and high-impact improvement was not included in the traffic analysis as it was not considered to be a financially-feasible or politically-viable solution. The Lydia Avenue/College entrance southbound approach is projected to operate at LOS F in the p.m. peak hour; however, this analysis did not account for the significant benefits that could be achieved from implementing the TDM mitigation measures described earlier, and better levels of service could reasonably be achieved through the TDM plan. The Fairview Avenue/Lydia Avenue intersection operations would fall to LOS E overall in the p.m. peak hour with LOS F operations for the northbound approach. This could be remedied with the addition of a northbound exclusive 150-foot right turn lane which would bring overall operations back to LOS C with no approaches or movements falling below LOS D. Northwestern College Master Plan T raffle and Parking Impact Study 20 13529.000 NORTHVllESTERN COLLEGE FIGURE 5. YEAR 2026 CUMULATIVE AM AND PM PEAK TRIPS 1 (25) AM PEAK TURN VOLUMES ~ 25 PM PEAK TURN VOLUMES r _'ld~J<J;".Ap<"XJ, 200r '" >. .. Qj o ..!!! .~ .<: '" > '" Cl .. ~ '" > < "0 I: .. "'", O.~ z1: w'" ...JC/) lll- <0 I-.!!! '" > '" ...J '" > :0:: .. :; E :::l U '" '" o '" ~ .. '" >- '" I: o :;:; :;; I: o o (I) > :;:; .. "5 E '" o '" N o N ~ .. (I) >- "C '" - .. Cl :;:; ~ . ~....U) .- I: <<;.2 '5~ E"C ",I: 08 co ~ o N ~ .. (I) >- (I) > <( .!!! "C ,., ..J Q; > <( ~ (I) :~ .. u. -;;;- "C C o () Q) ~ ,., .. (jj o Q) CJ) .. Q; > ~ (f) o ..J ro Q; > o 1ii ~ -;;;- "C C o () Q) ~ ,., .. (jj o (;j o ..J .<: () .. o ~ a. a. <( 1ii ~ -;;;- "C C o () Q) ~ ,., .. (jj o Q) CJ) .. ~ Q) > ~ (f) o ..J ro ~ Q) > o -;;;- "C C o () Q) ~ >- .. (jj o - (f) o ..J .<: () .. o 5. a. <( 1ii ~ -;;;- "C C o () '" ~ >- .. (jj o Q) CJ) .. Q; > ~ (f) o ..J ro Q; > o -;;;- "C C o () Q) ~ >- .. (jj o - (f) o ..J .<: () .. o 5. a. <( (I) () c E - I: W (I) Cl ..!!! "5 o - (I) > <( .!!! "C ,., ..J (I) > <( .!!! "C ,., ..J Q; > <( Cl I: (jj I: rn N <.> "C .. o It: >. - c '" o o Q; > <( Cl I: (jj I: rn ~ <0 w I'-- <0 w co '" o N OJ -;;;- "C C o () Q) ~ >- .. (jj o Q) CJ) .. Q; > ~ (f) o ..J ro Q; > o .... N Q) 'lliC;;- ~ ~ii5c~ ~Q)roQ) ::.- c>>'~ roO c-- -- 0 =0 ro "'ON-oLL >'0 row ~+-' > ~-g ~<( =u-g.~ ~ffiro-g. Cl)x-ij...J +->Q)o~ to W'- W wQ)m{ij c c o...c ~ ~ ~ .2> c c ro (/) "-.... Q) 3: .3.a a.. Q) ~=Ec ~2 ci.g> ~:5(]):o '(1) .~ :5 -g -fi~ g>- XU"L:: to Q) :::::i":-::: "'O(tuQ) cOQ)ro ::Jo,ro 0) .8.S rn.s .....=........ro ~~mE (l) U) 3: ill -O-Q)O'l C co rn (I) 8~~o Q)rooU en - () '---' roEQ)~ O)::J .!:: 'C .S~~o :g~.>.E m 'U +-,0 -cwo T"""::::J- Q) C ..0$:::J Q) ..0 (I) ID "'Ow.c> .200-<( g Q.l E ro ---00'- 2c~-g, c8o...Jaj IDQ.)+->.....C Ew(/)mm (l)roEQ)~ > ::Jc..... e g>..... ~ .a 0..- = C E"O~'-= -_"'O-o::J Q) emc.....:: .QN'::J:C g 10.0..;-.8 .~... g~.S"Og .E---o c..- 01:'" coro.8-g ON_+-> ::J ~.8~~.8 t::-o'c 3:..c [0>"00"5 (/)"OCOO c C::J_ en to Q) 0 I Q) .l=;xBO> Q) ::J to._ "'0 0"'- (/) Q)~rnQ).2 E c C,;:::: ~ ~ l!! 13 ~ Q) .g:E~13:5 ... .3:0 ~.~ u. ~ I'-- CO u. OJ (f) CO '" lL OJ S I'-- <0 w OJ W -;;;- "C c o () Q) ~ >- .. (jj o (;j o ..J .<: () .. o 5. a. <( 1ii ~ o o o a; N '" '" N N c ro>- o:-g 2U) "'-0 ro ro 2,,- roE 0>- roo> o.~ ()~ c ro ~D.. 2"0 '" C ~ ~ oClE t ro o ~ Zf- By 2018 a total of about 2,090 parking spaces are planned with the buildout of the Northwestern College Master Plan. Estimates of Year 2026 peak parking demand were made based on projected populations of students, faculty and staff and existing person-to-parked-vehicle ratios. B. Year 2026 Parkino Conditions Chart No. 2 depicts the hourly parked vehicle totals versus the overall parking capacity of 2,090 spaces. Peak demand would likely occur between 12:15 and 12:30 p.m. on a typical weekday and is estimated to be about 1,950 parked vehicles; this level of demand can be accommodated through the implementation of the Master Plan with a surplus capacity of about 7%. Northwestern College Master Plan Traffic and Parking Impact Study 23 13529.000 . 0 0 . + 0 0; . , : . I "'PO' N <0 '" : . I 00. .", , + "'PO' . j 0",. .", , : . . j "'PO' . I 00. .", I "'PO' . , I 0",. 'c- . I "'PO' . I 00. 'c- oo >- (l) "'PO' l) a. I co 0- a.. 0",. (f) ::l . . I (/l " 0> C <Ii . . . I "'PO' x > ro "0 0- n. <: . + 17.,;- Iii co en "'PO' <5 E co , ;- f- '" 0 0",. + NO '" , . I .0> II 's- 0<: 1II . I "'PO' oo z:;;: '" (l) " 1:::;; u 00. "0 N '" : + :c ~a. 0- S- (l) 1II "'P~ > (.)"0 . . . . + '" '" "0 - - 0- (l) u 0 . . . + ~,;- -'" '" I- ro '0 , "'P~ n. ~ I I a. eD . . + 00. '" ", 0 '" . . + "'P~ ~ '" 0",. '" , ;- >- .~ .1 "'P~ I 00. '0, I "'P~ . 1 0",. c '6' ro>. "'P~ ;;:-0 . + " ~ - 2'" 00. <h- . j ro " '6' 21i 1 "'P~ " E 0>- "0> 0. =a .S ~6> 0-10 c '" "'P~ ~o.. 2"0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00. <h C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ N 0 '" <0 ... N 0 '" <0 ... N '6' N N ~ ~ ~ .c~ -c- SaIO!lJa^ pa>lJl!d o !" Zf- VIII. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS The purpose of this Study is to identify the potential traffic and parking impacts of the proposed Northwestern College Campus Master Plan expansion. The following conclusions summarize the results of this Study: A. By Year 2018 overall intersection operating conditions at Snelling Avenue/Lydia Avenue and Snelling Avenue/County Road C-2 will drop to LOS F and E, respectively, in the p.m. peak hour due to rapid growth in background traffic levels. B. Existing and future year conditions dictate the need to correct for insufficient sight lines at the intersection of Lydia Avenue/Lincoln Drive (College entrance); removal of trees, brush, and berms will be needed to provide adequate sight distances for vehicles exiting the campus. C. Neighborhood concerns about near campus spillover parking on local streets east of Snelling Avenue should be alleviated with implementation of the Master Plan; the parking analysis demonstrates that future peak parking demand will be accommodated by new parking ramps constructed on campus. D. Specific measures to mitigate traffic-related impacts of Year 2018 Cumulative Conditions with Master Plan buildout are recommended, including the following: 1. Implementing a traffic signal at Fairview Avenue/Lydia Avenue with an exclusive southbound left turn lane of 250 feet. 2. Directing outbound right turns and inbound left turns to and from the west via the Northwestern College west gate during the p.m. peak hour and adding an eastbound 150-foot left turn lane at the west gate and appropriate berming on the south side of the intersection. 3. Adding an exclusive westbound right turn lane at Lydia/College entrance to facilitate safe maneuvers for college-bound vehicles. 4. Adding one new exclusive eastbound left turn lane at Snelling Avenue/Lydia Avenue with left turn lanes extended to 200 feet. Northwestern College Master Plan Traffic and Parking Impact Study 25 13529.000 5. Adding one new exclusive eastbound left turn lane at Snelling Avenue/County Road C-2 with left turn lanes extended to 200 feet. 6. Develop Travel Demand Management (TDM) Plan to implement institutional measures that would further improve future peak hour traffic operations. Northwestern College Master Plan Traffic and Parking Impact Study 26 13529.000 APPENDIX HeM level of Service Reports NW College Traffic and Parklng.StllOY 1; Lydia Ave & Fairview Ave ..1'_ '). r - " '" 4I25f2OO7 t /" "-!./ Syncltro 0 Report Page 1 2000 AM Pook Iioor T olt!: King Duvall Anl:too;on NW College Traffic and ParldngStudy 2: LYdia Ave &. NW College Gale .J- .. l- ,,- 412512007 "-. " t I'" \. .. ./ ~ ~ftill Lane"[bs ~,g~~($). Approach LOS 2.4 2000 AM Peak Hour TollzKlng Duvall Anderson Synchti>u Report Page 1 NW College T raffle and Parking Study 9: Lydia Ave & SneUingAve "J- _ 4/2512007 .. ,,-...., tl'\.~ . ::~~~l1figurations ''lwrl . t'1 rr. . .d--' ~ ooo,~,;~, oob'" '100~" ,il ... "91 w!l!lw'.. ("f>!1Rll. . ,.. .19.jl!!".ll9P 1.$lO . l.!l;OO."1,, .,.1.,. "..1. .."t.".",.,.,.:;.~OOQ:.L~1._'I\! Total Lost lime (s) 4.0 4.11 4,0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.1) 4.0 4.0 4.0 ~~J,.J!Jl:JaClor . t~. ,H.flf,;rUlil ',' l;\jQ' ,r9lt;;:;."1"1l!ts:.;~:,g,~~;,j.OOltt1~Qff~i1:f!l;~~'L"1;W Frt 1.00 1,00 0.85 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1,00 1.00 OllS Fitli't<ilEietj!'dlt~1'.~t;QQ Jl;~"'\,oo ,.n;:: .:.@S:"T~.1~QrJ:;';\!;W,;t::~.:;;~ Satd. Row (prol) 1770 1863 1583 1770 11112 1770 3539 1563 1710 3539 1583 FJf,pjrml!f!1\f';'. --, .. . ;;'jHl;>:.:::~;i'[Qtj':~;ll$,t~:.,;:,', . ..,fi[.~:j;"~:,,~~,:.Im~''f~I!!i![:j:l~-tlil Sa!d. Row m 1770 1863 1563 1710 1812 1770 3539 1583 1710 aSS9 1583 '" v,*'RilIill ~is RatiO Y!$i-li\ll!19~'.::. . Uniform Delay, dl f;>p:lfj~~lj:lfIr1ictor IncremoolBJ d2 .~l\y~~::. . Level of SaNJ<;;e ~i::h'~a'ljll} Approach LOS . HCM Average 0lIntro! Way 37.7 HeM LiMOl afSelVioo D H...."'''-',,'''d.-'"'-~.~''''',.....,., ."."" , ....n,:.,. :'''-'.i'..'.''',' _-~}!'Jn~~u",,_w'~~_'IT;a"m1,,"~; -"":~Lg::;c-:</;,l!1~~M;)~ - .+>0>>- "C,!i'J0i<>-- _,_,", Aciuated C~.;, Leng\t, (8) . .. 1'50:0' of 'osllime ($) , '~l!;tCii>p~j@'\JltJ~qf"~.:..~,:7~.~,':' ~1j:;l!:!i.'\I(;!);i@~:' .. ,'l: Analysis Period (mil)) 15 j;.'jt;Cl'il~~a!le$~Ol:Jp ,'j";, , ," .:~:. 2000 AM Peak Hour T pit<: King Duval! Anderson Syl"lChro II Report Page 1 NW College Traffic and Parking Sludy 11: County RoadC--2 &SneRlng Ave 412512001 ; -"'l-.,- '"'\ t I' \.. ~.; . lelle CQ"Il!)ureUo!1S "'I 1> ,1> ., t+ , ., t+ l' J~i'F!~WPhpJr ~~~1~~1J;l1l9 ;~:':i9QQ ~.1!l/ll!' :;'lll(l!!;r,;r~;"ll1PW'.:;1~lit'!~~1W!l~~1:l{{ij:;;1li,(l.~ Tolallost time (sl 4,0 4~0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ,to. 4~O ~\JutFiacloL '.1~p01\~\:,~ 'g l'i:1',pO; ~:too ~, ., '1:W, '''2.o-,!!i!:;:rf~!l!)~g~t4lll\'C~ q:m1!J,;l;t~ Fit LOO 0,92 1.00 0.95 1,00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 li't:.R~eR:;R~: Q:9friff';tpd .1~:l!,9S':~;tj\til!T;g:'!J;~ Satll, FIo',y (prol) 1770 1770 3539 1583 1710 3539 15a3 ~lt:EI1l'IiiI!\l,j'~: ...;, "f::lI~:J.:t)I!rS: .~.;. ::;.~. ':i\~}':' :~';'i~~,,~ 1~':~J}:[:!!11''';P:~El~~~t:11!l!i1 1770 1105 . 17.70 .1763 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 "';:'.fi:.;:r114~;;:i':~J1W':1::glj::::;:~ '..;;:r~.T,. .:-!lli:":~:::;;1~~:~$,i:Cf-Li;~~1~ffig;1l:'UW Peal;.hourmctor, PHf 0.00 (),oo 0.90 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ~i;~\~)-::'l;~:I0., :,,~f;:l:'f:~~;~":?;'~~~l:"~iJ,::"i:~:;"~;Gl!I~Jli.i:f:,::'1;11r,;:Z~;'i;;-f:~~:"!1m mOR ~d\.;G!im (\/phi 0 V . 0 0 14 0 0 0 :2 0 043 ~IlFlll\'H~)' ". fQl"'.'f'J~,."til:lll'l:"',m1.;2~'i~,~'i;;;Ta:::;:.~t'l~ .;.;,..>t,~;r(JI!F;,iI'~~~ ~~t1Jf'~~ilj:.. ,t~Jl1;i;iIYl..q...,,;&1~P:li..I~;I",'il:;t.tttl':';'i'i;'~ :kii:l~""~~~~'~~~~;;,~ZJl~ Permitted Phases 2 II ~(f~~1l11';ii3'{sl.i'%";~"7;'I'f~~~;"'~-'l;"''8'''I:'~1'',:'l''~1;:'.:~-f"':,(1;'!MJI.ll~:C~~_l;[~:~~ EffootiveG'''''''.1l ($) 7.7 14.5 9.S 16.11 10.0 00.8 93.6 1S.9 00.7 99.7 A:~~..lIif;',~ro::;.I.i:, j1;'i,la-: i QJ;1l['i'..\.:i"li;:~,?,.;~'liti?j'!'..i:::;;';!1J.l.ti;'::Q;!i!I:~~~::.i!t~:~~_Il Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.5 5.0 5.5 5.0 6.5 6.5 S.U- 6.5 6.5 . , ff$~€l~~~~~3f~~~~i:1t~ 1e8 . HeM Average Control Delay 12.8 HCM level of SeMce B !'tt:M\lohJfflIlti;!~~;filib:',;,+:G.:~'. '.f;';;'c' ':n:.;}', "'.".~ ~. . .:....;-'i:;:.="~,,:.a~.,,. ,':,':s. ACtuaI;.;.dC~~lill1gih(sl' .. 100:0 Sumoflo:ii'llm"(Sl 12:0'"' ... lijl~.fi.I.!on:Gll~clWUll~\l;\i<j i .'ilifj~"?I~~~~~iJ.:.: . ,1:~!fi;':~'jJ';;:l:,'f~; i\nalysi$ Period (mill) 15. (f:?sti_tj~~~Ofi(3{~0i>;~k*~-::;:---'~ - '< ': ,frti't:>: - - '~:~~~~3i:f ~ ,:, :,' _::-,,;,,",_~:: ,.:::;'- \~ i~::;l;01)~*t' :WOO AM Peak Hour T ottz King OtIvaM Arn1Jersnn Sy"chro 6 Report Page 1 NW CoUeg:eTrafficand Parklng Study 1: L~dlaA~& FaiNlew Ave .J. _. r- '''\ 4/25!2()07 t I" \,. . ..I 2006 PM P&ak Hour Toil:<: King Duvall Anderson Syn-chro 6 Report Page 1 NW College Traffic aOO Parking Study 2: Lydia Ave 8. College EntrallCe 4/2512007 .J. _~ <,+- '-' t /" \. ~.I . E::~'"::t:;;~:~J~C~;"~: ~ ~ ,;, i: ,~ Peak Hour Faclor -0,00 0,00 -0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.90 {tOO 0.00 0.00 l1f!!,!(tYfl~.j;~{~~r':;:~!ilE::~..;;::~.~:':3~ 1~id-...14o-. ..; 323lf .33 214 Pedeslrlans ws c . Average Delay 18.4 1l\Jfi~\>)i;timil!l1J.Y~litl;':'[':f,;~~;;::t?t;fOU~'!i'~t~.. Af"\~lysl~ Period {min) 15 '~:", ~,~",^ ';: 'W "/,~i;;;jf~:"f:~; \~0~~1~1;r~mj155~~~f,IT:8:~J:;/:1tti4~~~~:;~1~;;;ii,?:~ltjJ~:~ ~ :~,~~~'- 2Dll6 PM Peak Hour T olt2: King Duvall Allderson Synchro 6 Report Page 1 NW College TraffIC and Parking Study 9:. Lydfa Ave & Snelling Ave ",. ..... 4/2512007 ...,.- '"'\ t ~ \.1 . ~~n'" Configuratioru! . 11 t. l'. J. lj . ~ .. J 'I. t+ ~. '-.. Ti' . .t+. . . '{I !I''i'~.F!ll'Y (i,ipl);i!L '. tOOO1g.09~,~,,;,-mOO,:fi'1JlOlr";;;1~~f.;;t~~900::.'t~;" !ll<!IPVj~ICj%g ToIa! Lost lime M . 4.11 4.0 4A1 4,0. . 4.0 4.0 ,4.0 4.0 4.0 .4.0 4.0 1;$!\e'j31il:l':actOT__ .1.0{l;,",.1;~:d1{W..'f,9I1,r'!,';;j!l' .:;:''!@'<0;il9-,,'1;tIll'l ;(l,~. !M!!!fSf~ Frl 1.00 1.00 Il.BS 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.a5 !:lrJ5T~!!jd. .," 0.9))' '1:bg:;':';;;ljil9..;ll~':1j;'t:Il!);;;'.. .j.i;]KQ;9li:,!/IXlo "'i~:,.(I.~~i;~:5:t!ji Sald, flow (proll 1770 1863 1583 1770 1m 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 ~!r:Pfi'{jjj!!~"]; · '.:Jt:~.~~;.~l'll!G3ltA~{j:1~"..~:t;Lo..l~.l',;;t<<lj;i't'00"Q:~it:;t'f;gg:;;~f1ll:i Said. Flow (p"rm) 5115 1863 1583 1112 1m 111 3539 1583 87 3539 1583 !fGlu@'~!VRll)j.;.. j .' .'...;,..z4ll..;l1::I:~j~~5VJ ~~llj:"li;i!F'i~.j,..~.,~,!>:l' ..jjt..:s~;m~:'~j4 Pook-hol,rfa<;lOT. PHI" 0.8.2 0.19 0.94 0.690..as, 0.l!2 0.66 0.94 0.00 o.n 0.89 0.91 ~:fl~!YllIij...,. ,,;;,;;;;,~,:'~'}:a~t;'1i~~7::~;.-;;:~;.;;;t~"~~;,'h1;:lo; "~':'.~lf.Kl~ RiOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 110 0 12 0 () {) ;5 0 () 49 .;,t.ke GroU",",,_u !''''''' . 0 ""'., ."2/l5'.0......J21;?;;;...."""...j...-.....:.'~;.l\(t ..:i1.W""'l;,~'.o~~Z;f, ..,.''''''''.''''-11''''''::;:0.'::- ~L,n'_":'" 1":l'IP4!!O': '1I!IiH:1" ,~':":" " ' , ,'~_ ""':::-:S'0L"'Lvt::~::il1~,,,p_,, "~ ,_",,,,_,.,)ffil0___'..n_ -----O"-#"'u,,---,-,,-,~-,f~L;1~,_,_"2i;<kY. Turn Typ$ pm+pj Perm pm+pj llm+pi Perm pm+pl Perm _~Q~~~~tf~~:;j:;1}R~5;~ -;-~---~---:lf;:ls~-i1,Ji:~~:;~~ilti:~:11f@tjri~MJr~~~i~~;I~~~~~1Plt*f!4i3n:~~~,~~~r-i:4-sti1~~~~~f~r;i~- Permrtted Phases 4 4 (I 2 2 6 I> ~~~, ,<:lo(s):,:i al}:$'''~2!l).9~..~.~,":.3.~~~..:Iit!!l1:'Oi~~l:i';:'~f;..~;1iif":..~~F'"4~;~lWJ;~~~ EffectIVe Greoo, 9 Is) 4QJ) 28.4 28.4 24.1 11'1,5 102.0 92.7 92.1 91.3 6tH) 86.0 APf~fi<tg~"la~ . . a.;'f)ftT....(f:'jJg;..s'lj('1...!J:. '!j;jJJ;"~1l!ii.:';~~E~;.. .Q~:;;:Il:-a!-E';:tt~~~~3.'!}~ Clearance Time Is) 500 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.5 5.0 7.0 7.0 S.O 1.0 7.0 1I~~pnf!l-l. .....:..,;0.... lane Grp Gal' 311 W,s"tmiili~qL VIs Ra110 Pllrm :v~~IO;:::~. ., Uniform Delay. <i1 1'rll~J!jri~OT . Incremental Delay, 02 tle~~l~....' ,..,,'. .. Level of &lrvice }l,F'P~!'fu~~~J . Approach LOS ,.I Acluated Cycle Length (5) ltlIer$ll~\i.~pl1lC!ly'1l6~\lOTl Analysis P<orlo-d Imln) Q(;ii~-i!ll;~~. 2006 PM Peak Hour T oltz King Duvall Andersoo $ynchro (j Report Page 1 NW College Traffic and Parking Study 11: County Road C-2 & Snelling Ave ; - 412512:007 - , t ..' 200ll PM Peak Hour T oItz King Duvall AndersOl1 Synchto 6 Report Page 1 NW Colle{le Traffic Study 1: Lydia Ave & Fairview Ave 412512007 .J. -- " .r - '- '\ t I" \. L " 2018 Background AM Peak T ollz King l)uvllJl Andllrson Syocl1ro !l ~!)Qrt Page 1 NW College Traffic Study 2: Lydia Ave 8. NW College Gate /' - t 412512007 .r - " "\ t I' \. + .,; rade VQlymillvijli!!i-i..- .- Peak Hour F<lctor "l!\~lyllgwf<,l~ (~phj. Pedmilrlarn; tarn,Wkl\lJV!}..,; ,.' . Walking Speed (Ws) 1:',i~Bj9J!!(a~ . .:'. Volume Lelt \!~i.B!ij1i(, cSH V~.Ii?~~y Que"" Loogth 95th (ft} CoofiQ[~($)"': Lan.. LOs -..;,;.. "" 1:)-' '. ""pro;i",.,. .-...1iIl11ll1 App'o..c:h LOS c . 2.4 :t!tl~li.m' .''-ii!UI,,,,;..;.,,j~I#i~Qf;S!lhl!OOJ . 15 0,97 vCu, 97 2018 Background AM Peak T ollz KIng OuvaJl Andel\'Soo Syltchro (} Report Page 1 NW College Traffic Study 9; Lydia Ave & Snelling Ave .,,} 4/25/2007 - " .. - " "\ t ~ \.. .. .I 2018 Bacllgrour\d AM P"all T oilz King Duval! Anderson Syncnro 6 Report 1""9&1 4/2512007 E . HeM Average Control Delay 10.3 HeM lev<;! of Se<vlce B !if~V9!ii!rtlit{).~~'t!!!I0;~:'4s';;:;;ff;.1't">" " 150.0 Sum of lost time ';llI1il!"'-' , 15 201-8 Back9rQun!l AM Peak T oltz King Duvall Anderson Synchro6 RepQrt Pa.ge 1 NW College TraffIc and Parking Study 1; Lyclla Ave 8. FalrvIew Ave 4/2512001 ... - 2018 Background PM Peak TolU; KIng OIMIlI Anderson Sync!lro I) Report Page 1 NW College Traffic and Parking Study 2: Lydia Ave & Conege Entrance 4,'2512007 /_~ ~-'''\ t I' '-.~./ . ~;.:;~~ranons >"IM~rl:; > > >J',f~j~>b>"",;M$i~;;J;,,;rt;;T~:$,rol Hi' Grade 00/. 0% Q% 0% !J'41U[Iletv;,l1Ih) 62 ~jT:,$8;': >, ~, 11111-26-:::~1;'> ;;~'E:-;M'4!l;;;J!l.=!;:;;;~~T;:;'~ Peak Hoor Factor 0 llS O.llS 0.95 0,95 0,135 0.00 0,f15 0,95 0,95 0.115 0.95 0,115 ffl1.w,!,rilow r'ill& (-"ph) 65 Pedeslrians ~1I'~tl\Il@ Walking Speed (Ills) i?~cDni tlJoill< e > . ._M>_>M> ,> .,. as ell) Mlldloo MOOiim storage ven) ~,I!1;lI!i!l~.{ft) p~ p1aloon unblocked 0.99 ~~~~1Ij;9VcJ(l&ie ;~. vCt slage 1 coni wt ~g.rIlJ~:~~,[~r; VCu, urIDtocked vol M1:,;$iii~(s).' . lC. ;1 slase (II) Jm(;); 1'0 QU"UIl free % ~>'w.~ >H,~tlY.( ) 0.99 Volume left ~me R)gln c$H ~~~;tli>Qlpacl!y Qu$le length 95lh (Il) ~~IOOliy{,,) LanelOS Il<'T >6h Del {II) ~ iiy Approach LOS . Average Delay 17.5 1\\1~~\lOn capacity uli!tZiinon Analysis Period (min) 55 0 T J} 1267 1700 35 o 33 203 o 2018 Elacl<grounct PM Peak ToUt King Duval! Anderson Syncl1ro 6 Report Page 1 NW College Traftk: and Parking Study 9: Lydia Ave 8. Snelling AWt /' - " 4/2512007 -f - '- " t ,.". \. ~ .,.I Lane eoor.'9Uralions Ideal Elr;>;;r (itpnlll}, T atal Los! lime Is} Lmle U~ Foolbt' h h frt .. , I1ItI"rO!eciOO.' Said. Fiow (pro!) I1I!P' ll!M....' ...!J;IDI, h ,. , 1+ . "1liiQ!l'. ~OO:,.:f9\-iO~..11l0Q: "!IDO 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 h1~ ;.~l)ji:1.0\}:1.~n:!Q 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.95 h:ll.~ . ,'!.:Ql1" 'UJOj,,;lMil LQl> 1770 1663 1583 1770 17711 .-:: Q'~5h.~;~!j{.;::.i~J-::O~ 466 186-3 1 1197 177S , . Jf 1~;:1!JOQ...1 . 1!1.!lJ! 4.0 4.0 4,0 4.0 4.0 4.0 .... .;....;::;......"".,.. ""~ ....;c,"" "'1'''''''' .",,~.. N",,^ - 'in<!i,2.j0'.t"~x".~,:':}J;.}~R.'~:;:.Lt~~:~-,/~ ~~J,~',~1!1'~:.?15~'_J:;.~ 1.00 1.00 0.85 1,00 1.00 0.85 ..: ~:~ '1.00 '1;fl!l: q,~:t:1;~!t:';:;1;llQ 1770 3539 1583 1170 3539 1563 ',;;';:;U:G6: :1.00. :1:00;7.lioo...,;c '1~P!:;:;I<oo . ""'14 "3539"'$3 .'114"'3539 ' 1683 AclJJaled Cycle Length IS} lmei.secllOO,F'~~"":", UliiIzaIIDii -.'_',___,__ '_ ,}""~"~~'Hfj\T:,-___ n~_""m__ Analysis Period {mini C 'i!3i-ltitalL_ ~roUJl ' . .'.n.__ ___,'",' ,'- _ ,'m' . ;i:'i1W";!11~ ':: 2O111 BaCKground PM Peak T GIll King Duvall Amlet$oo Synchro 6 Report Pagel NWCOllege Traffic and Parking Study 11; County Rood C-2 & Sn~llIng Ave 412512007 .I' -- .... " - -\.. "\ t I" \.. ~ ./ 2018 Background PM Peak Tollz KIng [l>.JvaU Ande"'Qn Syrn:hm 6 Rap,," Pag" 1 NW College Traffre Study 1: Lydia Ave & Fairvlew Ave 412512007 ~ -....,,- '-, t r \. +./ 2!!fi'f15:4Z;19~~tt.T;:';"~~fJ2Y:"f'-i't;~y;~:<,>::,~_'1l&~:::';::t:" ,'c-- :,:;<-:,<':::);Ci.;'~'!i?'~~r:,:,-P::<:<,"'':,;:CYi75'::iL'_ti,"';;J,,",,~;,'}::-;>:",~"{' 5- II :2 225 0 116 0 91 4Q 202 272 :< ;[j~~[,~i1:f{~r.'[:Mlf o.fltj IL95 0$5 . O,II!t.O~:o.~ O;~ (I,"OO oorlyilowf$(vph) 5 (j :< 237 0 122 0 96 43 213 200 2 2018 Cumulative AM Peak T oltz King Duvall Anderson Syncl1ro 6 Report Page t NW College Traffic Study 2; Lydia Ave 8< NW CoUege Gate /' .- 4125i2fJiJ7 "".....- ''\ t". '-.. + ~~lJh"Ol .. .~~::;~" '!"~i[z;,,;i.,i;~t";~r~;~[";~::~i-;;;';'jin; ~i~ti ':::i;: ~ii;i ~;:;;;;';~~' :;;';;;2, Grade 0% ()"A, \1'% 0% Y~lit~I'!(~1 ,., ..t4l3:: :!~~;.;'i2t..!l1~;i";;~H/"~:i'~~;i~~~};:!a ,.~;-;::0fffQ. '321 Peak Hour Factor OJl5 0.-95 0.95 {l.95 0.95 0,95 0.95 (}.-95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hb\lfl\'Il<:Mn.ii11e(Ypll) .' .15ll:.'-;:~2lJ: .ss1.;";OO!r;~,: ,;;~';' .,"'511<::' 14" .;.'34 .'~f:!"., ,~2 __"" ,-Jl:!:" ^"" 'd _ _ _ - ;". -, C,: _'''' "'",._', _",(,v,,,)_, __ -.' -/,,-> '<"'" ,," _<_~_'~}, "~,;:, ", ,:;~ "".":;,:",, .~. ~ -g';!> _,_ ,,' _ '. : ;_ ,i- ;;":>A__, Pedll$trians ./ vCu. tJllb!oc1<ed' ~:~[tig/'!'f~L lC. 2. sl>lge (al Il"':$',: ., ~_,,_,,-\'j_ FL", . Averagll Delay 6.3 InmillktlOl\ Cllpa{:i!y U!lll~:' 62:4'l'a; il;'.'; ~~I~iSperiOO(mlnl . .,., '1if. 2018 Curnulefive AM Peak Toll, King PuvsU AndWSOlJ Syncl1ro 6 Report Page 1 NW College Traffic Study 9; Lydia Ave 8. Snelling Ave ~ 412512007 ~eti:~@:~ Approach LOS -t.,- '-,\ t I' \. J . Laf111C~liguratiot"t$ "i. t- . ., . ., ,,~...~... .,..~.. .tt r. ""~.. tl ~ .1' 1 Ig~Ylt.F!9V\1 (VphPll" ':":199!l, .1~l)Ll100q~: 1900,1lllN ;.19!.lO :19!.l0t\f'1~ ';'looq;,:t~'1t-i~'. ooq Total Loslllme ($) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0~ 4.0 ~)ji<~1, p:~ . ~j::@"; l;jjO..:1,fJj):'1,QIt :''1;nO:' ~.. .,. 1:pq:::~ l}.9~,j;{jlj:,;z::;i~;:;;!1i!l?: J;~ Frt 1.00 1.00 0.1l5 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 ~!t!'?r4l!lCJ~;;' .~~, 'j,Q.Oy~'1.00. ,jl;~__::t9q.. O~;;;.;;1:.~.tt!Ji>,,;;!f.\llij-?'::li:9.l}%:;l~;~ Said. RD'''' (prot) 1770 1863 1583 1770 1816 17703539 1583 1 !'Ii Pfflm~(f;; . .;:~:il5~'f.~~ 1:l)Q.~:O~;;::1,J>>'::'.lt~?'.. m 839 1863 1770 " !' liI~Vil!umt>lil:~~ AnaJ;;l1S P~Odmin) q:,'~!l~.~}"roLij:":;""..' 150.0 Sum :2018 Cumulative AM Peak r ottz King Duvall AOO4lfSOO Syoohro 6 Report Page 1 NW College Traffic Study 11: County Road C---2 & Snelling Ave 4125/2001 -" - ,. .(" +- "- " t I" ... ~ .i ~a::~~~~ ~~~, 1;"1I'tiW*lP , Total !.o$tlime (s) ~~"i!!Jtlf:~1.lCI0( . I'lt!i!Q~~ . Said, Flow (prO'I) J!J~~~~:i;n' , "^" '1^;'O"''''.'''' ::' . o~l!;,Y.lO,:::J!~..\':!1.OOlJ:,:' 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 . --"t:O!1:;~~,T:;:;j~:i:.~;gq: . H1Q, 1.00 0.111 1.(lO OJ)5 .::~,!l!l':';1~~j1T: ';;:;i.l~~::j::l:QO: . 1m 1004 1710 1762 .i::r~:;:;::!;tIl;~:;:):'f~ij).: ,::1 :jN;;: 799 1004 130-8 1762 .. "'""',. ,~ ,." .., ,..--'", _,';oJ ' l""":.'"wu'.,:"fOOl'lf.:"fOOO;;,',l""";:::",,,,O """,'"~.'~^''"'CC''' .~" _' '_.~ ~ '__'<"_ ,c, _ _^'~ "" '" ~,~ '~"~""~-'X'~-- )~.,. 4.0 4:il' 4.0 '4;0 '4,0 . 4.0 '. ;:i:I.(l() :~.~l:j~~jijl~;::!!l~'1:;'q(i 1.00 1.00 O.lIlI 1.00 1.00 0,85 '.'~:9!;:l:::i:Q(FmJl2r' !:!~~:':i1OO2.:f:~ 1770 3539 1583 1710 3539 15113 . ,:D:.\.lI;il:l....!;,~J,ijit<<lQ....: Q\~~~:1~~1l!! 1710 3539 1583 1 {vph} ~~~~:p~ ' vis Ratio Perm ~~D':J.:: Uniform Delay, d1 ~!\'lii'f'aclor mcr.emllofillll O.;,ay, d2 ~m:":" Level <if'Servioo ~~~<sJ Approach LOS . HCM A~ Control Delay" 11.2 HeM level ofSelvloe 9. ijCMVulu~tQCil~ til1b .' :::l:i~:.:j::' .:,:"". . ::' .'. ":::::" .,:'. ;}:'::,:'.1:' ,::::;:;):;:,,' -;:,"",:~, A.:luiliEKiCyde Lef,gth (s). . -150.0. sumOi losUime (s) ii;:o .,~~.. m~~~RWQapallityi,J,ti~.. ::>"rIlll~~",~:,;::~l.llY(!r,l6f,servfoa',':"'Ji:J'=s;iJg;r,;z:;:'::i'jj;,'.fi;;.. Si'1;1t~l Analysis Period {mln) 15 jl"I;:i!li:~.!.an.. Gto"~:'" .... .~;;j.::"jti, .l'., ;,yii.:i-i, 2018 Cum\ll~1IIe AM PeaK T ollz Kin9 Duvall Anderson Syncl1ro " Report Page 1 NW College Traffic and Parking Study 1: LydiaAvlil & Fairvtew AV(l ..I- _ 4/25f2007 \. '" ZOHI Cumulative PM Peak Syftcl1lo (} Report T<>1tz Kh'lg DUVllII Andersoo ~ 1 NW College Traffic and Parking Study 2: Lydia Ave &. College Entrance 412512007 .-J _ ") ".. - '"'\ t I' \.. ~ .I . ~~~t~tio...s/ "I~r;J _#:._f.ilt~c . ---u~lfi1.-.~::;l-,~:(::,:::, Grode 0% 6% 0% 0% l{91ume{v~Nl!) 145'~' 3!l, 33151 ,.194: 3f_u69: :M ':~\ 12\,:1~ Peak Hour F"Clor 0.95 0.95 695 0.95 0.95 0.95 0,95 0.95 0.95 0,95 0.95 0.95 gll~now rall'l (vph) 15?3..;}59\t~ 2!)4" 4t'l-:~ij:t _':1!>'fi"141l Pedestrians l~Wldlll(ft) Walking Speed (Itis) E~t!3~:. Rlghlluro !late Iveh) M!l~lY~:"- .':: Median sI.omge '-""h) !,l~ire!lj'!1:51g~(!i) pX platoon unblocked 0.95 ~llQrj!t!i;iIhi9~I\.ll1ie, vCl, stage 1 conI vol &;;n'e ""-,,,,,P"-"f VOl ~1:~~~~::~"!?f.!,!,J_~ ,-<_-_ ~ vCu, unblocked vol ~~(~. ~~:~~~~L pO qUIlue- froo % 64 ~e~(~l, Volvme left W~"'~ cSH ~~:'tn!:l'~l*ny Queue Length 95th (It) ~ll'tltD9Yfis} La...e LOS A~iolCb "",,-,-( ) -"""""'. .",,,,,,,,,$ AppmllCh LOS 1 A 2.4 201 a Cumulative PM Peak T DlIz King Duvall Anderson S)iIlChro 6 Report Page 1 NW College Traffic-and Parking Study 9: Lydia Ave & Snelling Ave /' - 4J25I2007 ')..,..- '\.~ t I' \. +" . ~~[~~rtS 1~19:.1Jl~f~'19@;"1J~';;1~t~il~;.jJ:'~1~f~ TolaILoslllme\s) 4.0 4.0 4,0 4_0 4.0 4.0 4,0 4.0 '1,0 4.0 4.0 lBMl!f;FaClor i.90 . 1,oo'A,Qo '.1J~Otqo' ,i.~;l~;"iL.r;:~..1~nql;.~qo>..2,I~;'!';'1':OO Frt HID 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.85 -.1.00 1.00 O.SS l"41F'il!~~ Olf!> .... t~;.,:.$i90.q,~11 1:01>; <.;t.9i~':iif,W;5cj't-fl!i;:.q~~~.ifOo . J~ Said. Flow (prot) 1770 1863 1583 1770 1785. 1770 3539 1583 1nO 3539 1583 !ilf.P~~ . ...-o;26:~;1'lJ(l.;111~h;:9;:ll41~'.";'''';;':;'!l~lR1~;'':1~lt~tJ.t.lJ(l.''~r.~ 400 1863 1533 11113 17$ 115 3539 1583 115 3539 1583 2011l Cumulative PM Peak T oJIz King Duvall Anderson Synet1!"o 6 Report Page 1" NW College Traffic and Parking Study 11: County Road 0-2 & Snellfng Ave 4/2512001 .J' _ ,. .... - ""\ t I' .... . ./ Totallo$t!ime{s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4,(1 4.0 n"-;''''''"IF~~' .1 ^" ".1 nn ... ,.... '1'M"" ",,'" '. . ... f ^^" n..... .1 rio.. . .1..M'-'. .":95'" .,,,,,,, ~l'!g::Q,\I;,:'.' '~lIVI' ". '.:?:lftfr;.::2,,\~i;;E;T::;-<"_':-::;{;.:'_\~*1!J:f;:-::~-E~~~:::: -;fI:Ef+FcJ;;i__';~:Y;:~<:~_\;o!'~~c;;;i--;_,_ -~;.<::t-:.,+ffH'c:-~:E:;H:~"'"~_~:~~'"t~~ Frl 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.90 LOO 1.00 0.00 1..00 1.00 0.85 fltPTl?!ecied A.'l.9'f>.tlllt; j~; ;:Q..~;, 1~.QO.; ;;O,ll/j1!)Jj;,llb J:ooo..i$::"if\lllIj}i'~ Sate. Row {prol) 1710 1764 . 17"70 1\li69 1770 3539 1583...17703539 1583 f!fJi'1iimittei:!'~;l~;;i~~Q();j'"" --;!t~...1;~ ,. ,.... .q;o,!!.;;j>9Q.i<Il!l:' . o,..~1;';l~P!l;;"l~ Said. Row ( 266 1764 1220 1669 105 3539 1583 2018 Cumulative PM Pllak T oftz King Duvall Anoersoo Synchro 6 Report Page 1 NW College Traffic Study 1: LYdia Ave 8. Falrvlew Ave 4125/.2007 ~ - "). (" - '- .... t t' \. + ..I lane Conliguralk>ns !~~I~~j5ly):' Totalloslllme {sl l~ijfpJlll, fo~Ct frt flt,~tQ~Plil\'F: ,< Satd. Flow {prol} l?"Jff'.~llltl(f:_,,) Lane Grp g~ (~h) v[{[iFjaUtI-iP,t'O{ ":..J.' __ - vis RalfoPerm .. HeM A\tMlge Control Del 16.5 HeM l.evel of Service B ~~!!ir' AClualedcycte Jm"'-eilliB!1""'a..'tli ,..J'!f:Ii)...~~.._Il... Anatysl$ pliiiod (minI ~:~Jt~~~l,1!i!tf). 2018 CUlnl.llalilfe AM . Millgalild T rnlz Kin!;! DwtlII Aodet'llOl'I Syru:l1ro" Report Pag;-;1 NW College Traffic Study 2: Lydia Ave & NW Colleae Gate .J' _ .... \.. - "\ -# 4/251'2007 t \. + ../ I'" 2018 Cumulallve AM. Mitigated T oltz King Duvall AndllrsOrl Syncl1rQ 6 RlllJllrt Page. 1 NW College T raffle Study 9: Lydia Ave & Snelling Ave ..J- 4125/2007 - ~ .. +- "'- '" t I' \. + ./ J~~~~0;I1~"'::1~1 l~cl9Ji':ctJj3-.i~t\~'n ~. 1~J~'Ui1~ 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ;,;J:l;fj7 ;;!~~11;;;:1,!l!lg€1;0r:i.. ;M!)'; ;:l{OO';,;1;.!,ll.l:;:;!!'~~rr\;;111J1!I;;~1:JlJl!~:1~t::: ~;M 1.00 1.00 0.65 1.00 1.00 (Ul5 1.00 1.00 D1l5 1.00 1.00 0.85 ; ().~t!(;t,gfi' ;:;1';OO.;((~5. J,~f&~;;;;!>.Jlll';;;;~; :1tfl'!!.f;;'l,l~Ai.2t~;llQ~Uf!.!!1I 3433 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 3$39 1583 17/'0 3539 1583 . . . .;,i;J:ll!i'... t;!Io.:'dl;!;tO;;:~l:!ttr'1:OO. ;.~~;,-';'R~~r};~;;(:w: ..;Qr~i(:i~~~~ 3433 1863 1583 1357 1863 1583 1770 3539 1583 Lane Conligumlioos $~l.fj!lw";-nl,.j"-;'; . io~i{)si~;;:;(s'i !;~.' \Jilt. Fad6r . ~Jll! ... .. Frl ~'~h..D'iC"" d ~i!~J:1..._~e Said. Flow (prot) fll!;Eilrfulttlill ,i,; saicf AmVperm) if,e""'Il;';;L. <"M"7~UU,\,,,-,),, Un;torm'oeh'Y. d1 ~f13irtor ;:~:;;\") ~ay. d2 level of St.;:.;;; ~p~j:)~~(4i). Approa<;l] LOS E . HeM Average Control Delay 54.5 HeM L"",e! of Sllfvioo D U''''''.vn''''"''''.'QCa...~:;:''n-- '.~~.'.,':.{l"". J', ',L',,", c..:,,,:,:.".....;.'' ~!,~ !VJ.?f:lj~"":'k^^ ,_ _~~~,'l',)~_~:p~__"'__H><_/>; ..,;:.rf-://L n. - . . - ;o<~!:':-" ",_"_ AeluateG Cycle Le1llJlt1 (5) .. 150.0 Sum.or lost time (5) 16.0 1!itlir!leCl!liijjH~aciiy t)~~!I 1~1JUWel~JS:~~:; ~..:,.Lc"E f'f": :':CCric; Analysis Period (min) ii' :Cr)Q~fli.Me&olip. .;~ 2016 Cumulative AM - Mitlgatoo T QI!z King Duvall Anderson Sl'l1t:hro 6 Report Page 1 NW Collage Traffic Study 11: CoUnty Road C-2 & Snelling Ave /' - , 4I25!2001 " +- '- " t r \. ~ ./ 2018 Cumulalive AM.- Mltigl!to;>d T (lllz Kfng Dl.l\lan MCeT$t:ln $}'!lChro II Report Page 1 NW College Traffic and ParklngStudy 1; Lydia Ave 8. Fairview Ave 412512001 ..; - .. f" - -\... "\ t I" \.. + ..' s ~~~(vph~ . vis Ratio Prol ~l\f~~~ilm' vie Ralio ~f~~;dl. . "!.ogr~n Fador. . ;r~~~ .' Approach lJellly 1$) ~LoS . ilOOll~..n" h I} '-~... ....Vl1. P Tolal LoslUme Is} lMe!r)~liFactor,' Fir" .... .. fl.J'r~Il:!!;l~.; Sald. Row (pro!) F.)~"enrlll!ell Sild. Flow (; 2018 ClImulaUve PM . Mitigall'ld T oI!z King Duvall Aru:l"rson Syoohro 6 Report P"llfI1 NW Coflege Tra.ffJearn:l ParkillgSt~y 2: Lydia Ave & Coil~ Entrance .J' ..... "\. r - '- "'\ 4/2!5f2007 t ~ "'+ '" 201$ Cuml.lialivl1 PM - MltlgatOO T oftz Kfng O1lV8n AIl!:!e~ $yrlChro II Report Page 1 NW CoHege Traffic and Parking Study 9: Lydia Ave & Snelling Ave 4/2512007 ~ - .... #" - -\.. " t /" \. + ~ 2016 CumulaU\I1l PM. Mrtigated T oIlz King- Duvall Andel"$Ol'l Synchrll (j Report P~1 NW College T raffle and Parking Study 11: County Road C-2 &SneilingAve 4i2SI2OO? .)> - " ~ ..- 4.... "\ t I" \. . .' mill CliIllulative PM ~ Mitigated T!)I1l King Duvall Anderson Synchro 6 Report Page 1 NW CoUege Traffic Study 1: Lydia Ave & Fairview Ave 4!25/2(Jll7 ~ -).,,- '"'\ t 1"'..... +./ . ~.Co"fi9\lf<l!1ons1 .. ..."""........."1+... ....... .""" ..,,~. .......... ". 'l<""'t "'''''''''l''''''~td..''*''... !"il~J~~~J;I.' :;,1"""'lf;c~;~~:::;1p"" ~Tc!.EMl-i,,"1.9l!lj~::5ti!QI~'';;-0,~jff~ll"ol~:: ..d~~ Totai Lostllme ($) 4.0 4.0 4,1) 4.0 4.0 ,~!flt$JJJlfl~'f~~;;<J:i:.::~' ',:j;,')~{ft~:~~f~f~~~S";~~j;'~;t;'; ~t ";R~~:~~';1lQfl:~~i~'r ~;~::'~1~~1~~~'~: ~f~:i!~~q:i; ;I;,~~k~-~~i~:~1~5)_;ftf~~ Frt 0,96 0.95 0.96 1,00 1..00 afwroloc~~;:; .'l!~{: .':':ji;}f:-ti,"jl:;.j~~ '::;::\i#i0tQ;~~~:~~~"Jf! Sal4. FlOw (pro!) 1712 1793 1770 1862 FffiR~qi}fmai: -;~:Zfl'1*~4fUJJ2::r~~.ffR1t~~~J f:iij~E~~i;:~;\~~(}~~!1~~:~:~t;4~~~1i~~~\~J~J~1%m~l~~~~~~ 1430 1700 800 11:162 ~~Jlri Uniform Delay. ~\Ol1"11ll'it~r incremental Delay, \12 ~;t~'L<. ". Leve! of Service ~~~!;f~fa}'iJl)'. Approach LOS . HeM A1I6raga Conlroi Oefa}' 23-.2 HeM level of Se-tvlce c ~~J~G!!it<<~;lp-;ca~,~~~~j~f~~1~1:1::';ii ,,:;,ltt~~'::;:, ',ft~(i',tfji,:i,~~-~*~~i~:i:c,:/:~,,~tt1g~il~:tlEj;;3.;}:r12TI'fr;1fJi~' ~~:~:~';;7:~l1~if~4,~::,~,:,':;ij;;g?!~:,~~i:~~ Acluate\1 Cycle Length (s) 76.3-. Sum of los! Dmels) .. 8.0. ~ ... ..- !1!!ii~~rn~!!l1Yl.Ili~~~j~<~~ .k;'l.:~,JCq~>>~$~ll~~j.~::':'~~'S;:'J.;.;l;;"';;f. ; ~~!?;.;iI;;1;;~ Ana/yliiS Period (min) 15 ~~~~~~~~~~9-~, :~~;:;l~~~i,~~;~fli~i~ij:f~I:,:': 2.026 Cumulalive AM Peak Hoot Tnll;! Kiog Duvall ~on Sync!lrn 6 Report Pagll1 MN Colklge Traffic Study 2: LYdia Ave 8. NW College Gala /' ... 412512007 +- -\. '" LOS ~~!l-Y{l>l Approach LOS . A>rerallll- Delay. 3.0. .. ... .. . ..~ , . lil~~pa~ tlm~~; ."'41;a.~~t '..m~I;'~~'m{?!.I~.~.i9:'tt:~' ."j;'jhi~~l'~'":ib:tltl' 'J!lfti1i:~~ ~.ysls P~:~~d (mln) 15 Volume left ~!1f:<tBillf11j' cSH o 0 2026 Cumulalwe AM Peak Hour Tollz King lJuvaU Anderson Synchro I:l Report Page 1 NW College TraMe Study 9: l.ydla Ave & Snelling Ave ..J. 412512007 -..... -r+- '.... t r \.1 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 '.' ..(ii::~P'JlJ:.l:!lO~:f~~.;'t;.WJ~J;J'l1IH~~~1J:~'jf~1i}j~~;'Jj@jjb;tf~:..'ttjitl 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 O.911 1.00 1.00 0.135 1.00 1.00 O.1l-5 .. '. !lj~2i;iffl!QjJ;;1';lll1; . .jRl.~,,'ljj~!l.. '';If:1\!:I 3433 Hlll3 1583 1770 1710 3539 15113 1770 3539 1583 " Frl 2026 CUmulallve AM Peak Hour T ollz KIng Duvall Antlemon $yncl1rQ 6 Report Page 1 NW Colleije Traffic Study 11: County Road C-2 e. Snelling Ave ~01 ..; -- "). " - '-" t I" \,. . .; . ~~~~~~:?"""'~2"l~~';':f~r~bW~"7S....J "",~'iidI~;i""~lj..;:1'9.J;j~Jt,;;:"l<;.l .L"","~,~_"w","","" ~ t",~,\c,... - ...f..,' -'.... -. . ., _."," ,,,,,_~L",,,,~A-.,(_.0""'....,.,,,,, ~'~~_'_""'_~'/. _~'L~~I~Jilm~t~,.~.";;~">__~=..~~_._.,",~"""""",, .l"(:'lf!;!'''~~'*''_ _"':V0'"':i~ .. '_"'._ .",_0Ui,;~J:!t Total LQst lime {s} 4,0 4.0 4.0 4,0 4,0 4.0 4,0 4,0 4,0 4,0 4.ll ~l:Jil!:;E~ ... i',:;-~~:1:~,::~i:~;;~~'iA~~.:!i';cli,~~~~,;[;:t~\11J~~';~.;;:t"mlt~ Fit 1,00 0.92 1JlO 1,00 0.1l5 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 EJk~IOO'" ....J;3''QM:;~!~l};!c.:-- .:~@!i;;'~l?~~~;~~~.a~~i0;~~JfliQ~I;;J;fl~fsljjbo Salt!. fk)w{pro!}. 3433 1711 1770 1003 1583 "'Ino 3539 1003 1no 3009 1583 flt"B'bltllj(j;',';;;c '. ", saf;j~ .....,,,.,, 2026 Cumulative AM Peak Hour T ollz !<log Duvall Anderson Syn;::hro. a Report Page 1 NW Colles~ Tl'liffi<:; and Parking Study 1: Lydia Ave $. Failvlew Ave ~ -."....... '-, 412512007 t I' \. I ..I 2026 Coolulalive PM Peak Hour T altz KIng WVllII Andel"llon Syncllro 6 Report Page , NW College Traffic and Parking Study l!; Lydia Ave & College Entrance ..J- __ "'tt 412512007 .(" - '- "\ t /'" \. + " 2026 Cumulative PM Peel< Hour T ollz l('fl9 Duvall Antl'll"OOn Synchro I) Repoll Page 1 NW College Traffic and Parking Study 9: Lydia Ave & Snelling AI/e j- - 4I.25f2007 +- '- \. .; ~~f~;(i(~,}; Eff~ive~, 9 IS} ~~~l~l?i!lL~:. Cleerance Time IS} H'-""5.ii;k'"t;;,;."" "" , " . "',F ",C,;',; ---.-,!IlP!l:t!i, '';:.;i~,.,,,.;,c,'',,,,-! L$e G'l' Cap ("Phi 549 4n ~~9'PJOk':f:i'7:.j')lll~" .:0".10' via Rallo PI'lrm " . SlIi'RIPi~: ' Uniform Delay, ~~,'llGtllr IIll;rllm8fllal Delay, d2 ~~-:;Ct;:::.-:'.','. Level Of ~ ' ~(5) AWroai:hl..Os . HCM A_lif9'(> Conlml Delay 108.7 HeM Level of Service F llIlifJ!liui:!ii' lo'C\lllatittl\i!1l!>'>:":::7li~:;, ,. ' i :',"::;:1'::.,' ' " AdUiikiii Cyde Loogth is) 15ri~O ' Sum of losl!lm<;> (5) ~~Mf~Qill',~:::'. ':i!:tif~ lCJ)t:,D~t~~,.. ,i,f: :i,,:,r:~ltii?:'f,-::,:~~:~r!~'~~ Analysis Pi1lrIod {mln) 15 !l:'i'~~~rwGiiioprii,i:;,i;~r\"::: ,. 4 ,,':~Jl!~~~~fil~E.tt, 24,0 38.'1 5.0 4,0 :::i-s1?;:;'HW 405 1S4 .: ',:'i'l:l:(jQ: 0.02 1):01. 8 2 6 ,16$l::1;<fW' " ., 1j?~7'~:~~t;:;:~g::c,':lr&:~\"~~~~~ 18.4 16.4 16.1 $.0 89,0 4.8 16.9 76.9 Q!;f':;?-::"~:,,;: :{!:'i(::~!~1,gJ~i;~!l,~'~fJ{:k"~ 5.5 $,0 7.0 1.0 5.0 7.0 7.0 .3,0 .',."n3:i:::"ill ".':::'''' ""':',i3:l>:>''l1::,;::;:,iij.:(i ..''-:'&:~'$11'':'' " '~?~::0:5.t"'"..0,"",':::;;;< -r!!:~,";c"5!;Q, ~ ",t~.[g;:>,*,~~~ .~);~#~ l' ,,"";-:2f~ 193 191 2100 939 54 1814 612 .eeL~I...... ,<~~t2l1a!~,::~'" ....;..fj,~\W.:il-!fi.ll~lfdl om 0.11) F 2026 Cumulatiye PM Peak Hoor To~z King Duvall ^m:lwsQn Synchro 6 Report Page 1 NW College Trafffc and Parking Study 11: County Road C-2 8< Snellinj;l Ave 4l25I2oor /- - 4- " 2026 Cumulalive PM Peak Hoor T oltz King Duvall Anderson Syncl1ro II Report Page; NW College TraffIC and Parking Study 1 :l'(dla Ave & Fairview Ave ..)- -+ 4/2512001 Capacity ralia enl;ilh Ill! . lntetS<lc ion Capacity UUlizalion ~~ru' .(.'1. " ~_~'~~I!!ID:.. ,<' c Crilical L200 Group l- ("'"- '''\ t ~ \.1 . U~~~~l' $ 1""". '1'''~'' .""""'.1."""" ~",',~. .'1'""'''^..1''^''....1.A..'''',,!.~.~Ml..1ril..AMn ':" _""""~t~:X;!~ S~~.. ,:,,---,_~~~~:~n _3~ltt~'::-I~~:1i;iL__~~;;:E:IR"t,{~;X:-f}_,-,~'::-f,~; ,~~}<k1<~7~~"r-:t~~T;:i:!f'~~;P~f5"i-~~:_)~:~i:::"t_~g TptalLost Uroo Is) 4,0 4J) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 '!fj,~L~Fl:lcror . ",'. 4'7.~;.'dj 1,m6i;i~.oojit.~qQ ,"~lil.':,-8t; Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1,00 j~~r '., i:":,: ;:;~:~""':;;~r 11~:.'f7?f;~1~";"i;;: ;1~::;' ,.. '':;i;.-f';'1~~;;i~;;;~~i':~~~;;:;!i~ ./ Protected Pha$ES _4'~liS.' Actuated Green, GIs} ~~~.g:l~l ~tI'ld~CRaI'o grflli~'f.lr -Is' ".~.~,_!<p-~Jr!W '..J Vel>lcle Extension s leveJOf 2026 Cumulative PM Peak - Improved T Dllz King Duval[ Anderson Synchro 6 Report Page 1 NW College Traffic Study 1: l~laAve & Fairview Ave ~ '- ....... f '\ "" - t 4/2512007 ,. \. + "' 8.0 .Q 2026 Cumulative AM Poolc-lmprolled Tollz King Duvall Arn:l8r00l1 Syoohro 6 Report Pllge1 MEMORANDUM DATE: October 3, 2007 TO: Mayor and City Council Planning Commission FROM: James Lehnhoff, City Planner SUBJECT: 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update ReQuest Review the information collected at the August 8, 2007, community meeting and provide comments. Questions and additional input is also encouraged. Community Meetinl! On August 8, 2007, the City held a community meeting at North Heights Church to kick off the 2008 Comprehensive Plan update process. The two hour workshop and open house included a presentation, a survey, and a small-group activity called the Arden Hills Game. An estimated 60 people attended the meeting, and fifty surveys were collected. The results from the survey are attached to this report. The Arden Hills Game included a number of questions about the community, and the game was completed in groups. The primary goal of the meeting was to gather input from residents regarding their thoughts on Arden Hills, the state of the community, their concerns, and where the community is or should be heading. While the responses do not necessarily represent all of the thoughts and concerns City of Arden Hills Joint City Council/Planning Commission Work Session October 3, 2007 C:\Documents and Seuings\jackiefreppert\Local Settings\Temporary Internet FilesIOLKDl\J00307 - PC CCJoint Meeting.doc Pagelof5 from the community, they are helpful in developing, organizing, and prioritizing information in the Comprehensive Plan. The Arden Hills game included the following questions: I. Why do you live in Arden Hills? 2. What are the best qualities of your neighborhood? 3. What things could be done to make your neighborhood better? 4. What could be done to make Arden Hills a healthier place to live? 5. What park and/or trail improvements are needed in Arden Hills? 6. Lexington Avenue and County Road E currently serve as the commercial center of Arden Hills. What could be done to this area to make it better serve Arden Hills residents? 7. What are you biggest concerns about the future of Arden Hills? 8. What is not in Arden Hills today that you would like to see here in the next twenty years? The collected information covers a wide array of thoughts, ideas, and concerns. Although there was a variety of responses, there were clear themes in the collected information. The themes included, but were not limited to, the following: . Maintain and enhance the green, suburban, and small town feel; . Protect the City's trees, lakes, wetlands, and open spaces; . Promote, maintain, and expand the park system for neighborhood and community uses; . Provide additional connections within the City's trail system for pedestrians and bicycles; . Increase the safety of pedestrian and bike crossings; . Provide transit options; . The school district is highly valued; . Traffic and congestion is a growing problem on major roads but less of an issue on neighborhood roads; . Arden Hills is a safe community with little crime; . More senior and affordable (perhaps life cycle) housing is needed; . A mix of services in the business area is needed, particularly a restaurant; . A community gathering space is desired; Although the Comprehensive Plan will not be able to address every question or issue brought up at the community meeting, much of the information will contribute to the development of the Comprehensive Plan. The responses collected from the Arden Hills Game are summarized in the attachment by question. City of Arden Hills Joint City Council/Planning Commission Work Session October 3, 2007 C:!Documents and SettingsyackiefreppertlLocal Settings\Temporary internet FilesIOLKDl\J00307 - PC CCJoint Meeting.doc Page 2 of 5 Reviewinl! the Responses As the themes and full responses are reviewed, please consider the following questions: 1. Are any ofthe responses surprising? 2. Is anything missing? 3. What should have additional focus or research? 4. What topics or themes are the most or least important? Upcominl! Meetinl!s The next community-wide meeting has been scheduled for Tuesday, October 16, 2007, at the Ramsey County Public Works facility in the Marsden conference room from 6:30 to 8:30. A postcard is being sent to all property owners in the City. Attachments - Helpful links - Additional Input (homework) - Survey information from the community meeting - Information from the "Arden Hills Game" City of Arden Hills Joint City Council/Planning Commission Work Session October 3, 2007 C:\Documents and Settings!jackiefreppert\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLKDl \100307 - PC CC Joint Meeting.doc Page 3 of5 Helpful Links from the Metropolitan Conncil: Homepage: htto://www.metrocouncil.onz! 2030 Regional Development Framework: htto://wvvw.metrocouncil.org/planning/framework/documents.htm Arden Hills System Statement: hitp://www.metrocouncil.org/planning/assistance/SysStmts/ arden hills. pdf Local Planning Handbook: htlp:/ /www.metrocouncil.org/planning/LPH/handbook.htm 2030 Regional Parks Policy Plan: htto:/ /www.metrocouncil.org/planning/parks/2005/ParksPlan.htm 2030 Transportation Policy Plan: htto:I /www.metrocouncil.org/planning/transportation/TPP/2004/summarv.htm Water Resources Management Policy Plan: http://wVv"W.metrocouncil.org/planning/environment/WRMPP/WRMPP2005.htm Arden Hills 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Webpage: htlu:/ /www.ci.arden-hills.mn.us/comvvlan City of Arden Hills Joint City Council/Planning Commission Work Session October 3, 2007 Page40f5 C:\Documents and Settings)jackiefreppert\Local SettingslTemporary Internet Files10LKDl\100307 - PC CC Joint Meeting.doc Additional Input Staff is in the process of gathering and preparing background information for the Plan update. For those of you that have not submitted this information, please write down the three biggest opportunities and strengths of Arden Hills. Also, please write down the three biggest weaknesses and threats that you see Arden Hills facing. Please return your comments via email to James at iames.lehnhoff0l,ci.arden-hilIs.nm.us by October 5, 2007. Opportunities/Strengths: I. 2. 3. Weaknesses/Threats: I. 2. 3. City of Arden Hills Joint City Council/Planning Commission Work Session October 3, 2007 C:\Documents and Settings\jackiefreppertlLocal Settings\Temporary Internet FileslOLKDJI100307 - PC CC Joint Meeting.doc Page 5 of5 " " ." 0 0 ~ 'c: 'c: ..- '0. 0 '0. ~ li N 0 0 c:: 0 0 Z z 1: - " '" '" ~ t t OJ 0 0 0 .<:: <Xl a.", a. '" '" 0 E '" E ~ ~ ~ ~ [;' ~ '" OJ E 1: 1: ~ '" '" '" " '" c:: to t '" <( .6; 0 ~ ON a. a. 0 ~ E E z OJ .<:: 0 (L -' 1: 1: en '" '" OJ ~ t t (ij '" 1: 0"- 0 0 E OJ 0 0.0 a. I'- N c:: o.~ E E OJ '" "- OJ " -0 -0 " z z ~ ~ N - 1: N " ~ '" t 0 0 J!1 a. a. :E E E OJ " (ij ..- N ;= ~ " ..- -0 ~ -0 N N '" :2 Qi 0 OJ Z Z OJ E ,., .<:: <( 15> en " " OJ e e OJ - U5 ~ en OJ ~ .8 OJ c. 0 I OJ OJ a. <( E ~ .6; 0 .e .<:: , ." ~ - '" OJ :J " OJ ~ 0 OJ 'c: ,., E :J ~ :J " -'" " t 0 ~ ~ e OI 0 ,., ;= 'S a." OJ a. OJ , > ~ :J " 0." ~ 0 0 W OJ '" - OJ ~ ." .<:: " " OJ ~<( " g> c: .S! ~ 0 .<:: 0" OJ (ij ." - - (ij E ._ (ij (9 0"'''' :J OJ.l!l -0 ~ -'" -0 - OJ OJ 0_ ~ 0 .& -0 ~ -0 ~ I- ;=:2:2 "'''' ~I- I- 0 I- :J 0- e ~ ;= 0 0 O~ 5: >- I (L Uo/l e o '" .i5....- o o Z "E '" " o c...... .5N 1:- ~ - e '" "'" o 0. .5 "E '" " o 0. co .5 o z - e ~ o 0. .5 o z ,., Cl e e 1i5 Q) -'" :c 0/1 o .g ,., .0 a; > ~ .9 ~ :c '" Q) .c - ~~ e~ 0. E ,., -.:: Q) "0 a; Q) ,5 '" ;: .Q c;; 1ii ,5 '" e '(jj '" o .c Q) "0 .;; e a. e o '" .5...- o o Z - e ~ o 0.0"> E~ 1:- Q) > "E '" "'" ON 0. .5 "E ~ o o.N .5 o z - e ~ o 0. .5 o z e e 1i5 J: <( C_ .- '" "'0 .l!!1- '" .9 ~ c;; ~ o '" !!! '(jj '" ~ -c- '" '" e Q) 0. ~ ~ Q) C;; Q) a. c: '" Q) Q) .: g E c: ~o_ c CD - e CD I:: w 'S; o ~ CD c m 0 > CD ~ c ~ ~ '" Q) e ~ = E ro ~~ ~ ~ ~ E 16 E:; 's; ~; ~ ~ .~ a. 'c ~ ;: '0 g Q):J _ .9 cu 0" '-E .~ U) Q.'c "'ffi E .- (/) .E_ '" 2 0 :J ~ m cu a. C) C mU) ~~ 1:: e 0 ro~ Q) "C Q) a. 11 L.. '5.. ~~ ~.~ _.~ ~~ w.... V en ::c-~ -=u;Q) c: Q) > Q) Q). '" C)0 Q) CIJ Q.cn E:.w "'C :J "'C lIJ 0 CD _ :c-g ~ ~ ~~ -7'LL~ ...... Q) CD J2 Q)- ffi C CD en "C 0 92!ll '- (I) ~ ..::.:: men t:.- as: CUE ro Q.~ m~ E -...J ~ >. ~aj cd ..c. ~ui 0.0 ~ ~ CD g 0 CD ~ ~ a. 0 OJ OE:Je> -eC/) [.Q -EO_(]) ~g> ~ -g ~~ ~E Q)ti Q.I EQ) -a,~ .c.","'~0 ..c CLI ~ 'ij) ~ ;E C) E c_ =c ~~ g- 8 .!:':i ~.Q ro...... CD ~ U)..Q 1ii~ gm ;:~ c~ ~.9C1)Q)o "OJ::5 gc: ~e .co~g~~ ro ui Q) .9 0 m ..... '0.!: <Cm :JI....,C Cot 4:: o-E cn;: ...0 -0(1)0) Eo O-C~~O ~~ 5:5'.oi:: '-0. U)'-.......c ctl oJ_ ~E ocn"S,.w g; ~g~ :.~ d-E'~mg. ....% ~~c =m oo.,g"'O(ijE ~ 'E(/)roJg~= QiI.OL."Q) Q) ~ :J"Eo:c......r::: afNQ):s~-g .9(UQ)E~zc:-g.~ 0+::2:0:313 t.E:5E...... ,G.It)- 'o-coSmc o=Eoc>-"'EQ)~ cQ.lQ,)U)c,- a.Olrooo~<(C:E :::".~>Cl)Q.iro Q-.!:J:Q)':::5 C (l'}of{'oc:oQ) ..J U) ..J .5 8 CD CD m '- E .- (U >- 0::Q"'rn:5..!!!E c..-oQ.Q) .000.1 c '5 .5 c ~ E ~ ~ E .C .~ ~ C ~ 00 ~ i!l.o'iji';;,oQ) 8';; e.-o/I o~;: E e 1J +:;~ L..~cC:S~!Ew.g.,g:Bc '0 ~ C/)C .!;;; 0. E Q) ~ ~...... L.. _ rn L.. 0 ~ '" e 0 0 ~ _ .u ~ L.. '" '" ~(\'IO:J.-00'-~ouL..n::cu c~__ 0 0 e ::J:C"t) 0.1-<:(' Q)~ Q).B (\'I = .c~~..c:J Q)cC:S I ...J--~.c L.. ~(\'I~~mQ)o~~~m0.B0;~ oW- L.. - en ~ ..c .- C 0 C ~ Q) Q) C 0 ~ _~'GQ)O_Q)__:Co~=-~_Oc~ Q):EO o~.~:J+:; 0 0 Q)e e 00.'00 (\'I > C~0 '-::J~(\'I'_Oen'-Q)c.cQ) Q)E'~CooE~0~Q)~.~~ Eo.(\'Icc o -e >0>L..~= -==Q)~ L.. OL.. (\'1(\'1 (\'I (\'I 0.= ~cQ):t:'(3~~- ~"O_~i~e.~~I~~~Q)[~~~cO o ~ -~O(\'lOmx.cQ) (\'IQ) :J 0= Q)~c ~cl-L..+:;", flJ ~-- ~.!!.e_~ (\'IooQ)Q)o _ ~ cu c.c~c.co:BOL..~:Jo__ocS~ 00~en- ~~Q)moc:Jc-c~ EQ)Ox~~m~~ggoSo~~g :gS:~i.i:=t;=t;=t;>menwoenow..::> <( i< I- i< i< i< i< i< i< i< i< i< i< i< i< i< i< iIi ,., Q) C: '" C/) c;; o I- August 8, 2007, Community Meeting Comprehensive Plan Update Compiled Results 1. Why do you live in Arden Hills? a. Community character i. Most of the streets are treed (2) ii. Quiet, small community (2) iii. Great neighborhoods (2) iv. Not overcrowded (2) v. Rural look & feel vi. Bedroom community vii. Tight knit suburban community with small town feel viii. Separation of residential and commercial use properties ix. Nice neighbors x. Oasis in an urban desert b. Environment i. Open/green areas (4) ii. Trees (3) iii. Lakes with wildlife/natural beauty (3) c. Parks and Trails (1) d. Access to parks & trails (5) i. Close to several county parks ii. Sidewalks on 96 Hi. Biking e. Educational System i. Good public school system. (6) ii. Educated Citizens f. Location i. Proximity to both downtowns (13) ii. Proximity to work (3) iii. Easy access to highways (2) iv. Convenient (shopping, cities, sporting events, location to downtown) (2) v. Close enough to airport (but not noise) g. Safety/low crime (5) h. Housing i. Wanted to live on the lake (3) ii. Arden Manner is what we can afford.- Hi. It's where they put my house. iv. More bang for the buck housing i. Employment Opportunities (1) j. Other Amenities i. Wonderful place to raise a family 1 ii. Families were close by iii. Access to shopping and public library iv. Close to fitness facilities v. Low taxes 2. What are the best qualities of your neighborhood? a. Community Character i. Few streetlights (2) ii. Well maintained properties (2) iii. Good neighborhood for children, privacy - lots of cul-de-sacs. iv. Suburban community feel. v. Live on a cul-de-sac (creates great neighborhood). vi. Yards are nice just the right size, mature trees. vii. Quietness. b. Transportation & Traffic i. Low traffic levels in residential areas (4) ii. Access to major interstates (2) Iii. Accessibility to St. Paul/Mpls. Etc. c. Housing i. Good mixture of affordable & higher value housing (3) ii. Single family housing iii. Owner occupied d. Easy access to shopping (1) e. Professional employment (1) f. Parks, Trails, & Recreation i. Trail system (7) ii. Can walk to park (2) iii. Close to City Park and trail system. iv. Places to walk, v. Various sports vi. Recreation facilities. vii. Summer programs for kids. g. Environmental Features/Qualities i. Many trees (4) ii. Landscaping & amount of green space (2) iii. Open space (5) iv. Lakes (2) v. Attractive topography (2) h. Safety, low crime (5) i. Quality of Life i. Friendly neighbors (8) ii. Sense of community in Neighborhood (3) Iii. Community involvement. iv. Sense of stability. v. Clean community 2 vi. Privacy is respected. vii. Quiet. viii. Neighborhood library open to all. j. Amenities i. Proximity to churches. ii. National Night Out, Street Parties, Garage sales, Labor Day Picnic, Beach club-picnic. iii. Emergency help is close. k. Educational Opportunities (2) I. Other i. Upper income residents. ii. Town home ass'n is run well iii. Well water irrigation for sprinkling lawns. iv. Off street parking. 3. What things could be done to make your neighborhood better? a. Transportation and Traffic i. Congestion (6) 1. General congestion and traffic flow (3) 2. Fix traffic congestion on Hamline Ave (3) ii. Upgrades and Maintenance (5) 1. Edgewater St. needs road construction. 2. Improve road maintenance - right turn on red light at 96 and Hamline. 3. Keep ditches mowed/trimmed to be able to see traffic. 4. Resurface old Snelling from New Snelling to E2. 5. Better care maintenance of hwy 96 iii. Need transit (3) iv. Better ped. Crossings. v. Access 1. Better access to Hamline Ave. from town home area. 2. Connect smaller streets around freeways & highways. vi. Other 1. Better lighting on streets (3) 2. More unified street profile for the City. (Curbs, width, etc.) 3. Sounds barriers along highways 10 & 96. 4. Put up traffic signal on Hwy10 by Big Ten. 5. U turns at Snelling & Glenhill. 6. Slow speed on Hamline Ave. Especially the Sheriff/Police. 7. Study traffic flow. b. Housing i. Control occupancy levels in rental properties, particularly student housing. ii. Senior housing options. 3 c. Commercial/shopping i. Vibrant central business district (main street). ii. Small neighborhood restaurants. d. Parks & Trails i. Bike trails (on and off-road) (5) ii. More trails and connections (5) iii. Walking paths & bike paths --> around lakes (2) iv. Need sidewalks (3) v. Trail maintenance vi. Safe trails vii. Crossing Hamline on the trail system. (Crossing lights?) Pedestrian crossing at intersections in general viii. Repair playgrounds & maintain ix. Valentine Park needs to be improved x. More trash receptacles along trails e. Environment i. Fewer geese ii. Control contaminated storm runoff esp. sand salt etc. from roads iii. Open space - want more iv. Tree plantings v. Beautify city hall and bldg & grounds vi. "Go green" plan f. Community gathering spaces i. Make the city hall space available for citizens/resident events other than council meetings & hearings (2) ii. Encourage neighborhood gatherings iii. Construct a neighborhood gathering place (e.g. coffee shops) iv. Consider working to use SV community center g. Other i. Enforce property maintenance code ii. Way finding signs. Gateway? Entry? iii. Assessment policy holds City back. (Improvements) iv, More recognition from community that we're here - we are nearly 10% of the Arden Hills Community. v. Concern about Northwestern College. vi. Northwestern College needs signs for direction. vii. Old city Hall property developed as park or residential. viii. Ask New Brighton to clean up business on N.B. Road, west side, by Railroad Bridge. ix. Tie together "old" "new" TCMP. x. Greater diversity. xi. Version of its bulletin - newspaper. xii. YMCA 4 4. What could be done to make Arden Hills a healthier place to live? a. Trail Connectivity and Use i. Trail connections, do more to integrate trails into a system within neighborhoods and connection east/west to community (6) ii. More trails (walking & biking) (3) iii. Walkway over Snelling on Co Rd E. iv. Encourage more use of trails. v, Markers on trails - (Distances used to be painted until resurfaced) b. Alternative Transportation/transit (2) c. Environmental health i. H2o quality (4) ii. Less traffic (pollution & noise) (3) iii. Reduce goose population (2) iv. Don't dig up TCMP land - too polluted. v. Bus depot across from MVHS causes air pollution. vi. Fewer chemicals on lawns. vii. Better trash receptacles in parks. d. Health facilities i. E.R. Healthcare (2) ii. TCMP - attract a health center. (Major medical?) e. Recreational opportunities i. Recreation programs - adult and child(4) ii. Partner with neighborhood communities for parks and recreational opportunities. iii. Partnership with Shoreview @ community center. iv. More parks. v. Community Center. vi. Fitness center in Arden Hills. vii. Water ski lake in TCMP. viii. Look outside city boundaries residents access SV/NB libraries and centers. ix. A commercial area that you can bike too. x. Nice restaurants - more hospitality businesses i.e. coffee shops small restaurants ethnic. f. Safety i. Less traffic (3) ii. Enforce speed limits (3) iii. Fewer roads iv. Better traffic intersections. v. Friendlier intersections. vi. Safer trails - biking walking vii. Pedestrian crossing at (Cty Rd E & Snelling, Old Snelling to Hwy 10). g. Open Space 5 i. More green space - less density. 1. Reduces stress. 2. Key parks maintained so outdoor activities can be obtained and done - for all ages. ii. Don't develop open spaces. iii. More trees, iv. Maintain TCAAP open space. h. Restaurant and grocery selection. i. Green building (2) j. Other i. Encourage elections. ii. No high density housing in TCAAP. iii. No student housing. iv. No more non-profit organizations. v. Permanent restrooms in parks. 5. What park and/or trail improvements are needed in Arden Hills? a. Trail Maintenance (4) b. Trail Additions and Connectivity i. Connect more of the trails - local and regional (6) ii. Access to nature trails in TCAAP (2) iii. Add Cross country ski trails (2) iv. Co Rd 96 & Hwy 10 connection into TCAAP from south side (2) v. Bike trail on Co Rd F. vi. Under 694 (east/west and north/south trail). vii. Bike pedestrian bridge over 694 on Hamline & trail along Snelling to Rosedale, viii. Edgewater St. area is not connected to trail. ix. See if informed trails could be made formal (Trails along Snelling) x. Better crossing - people/cars don't seem to stop for you when in crosswalk (i.e. Hamline Ave). xi. Need more - like the natural & dirt chips trails. xii. Walking areas. xiii. Trails need to go in back yard area not in front yards. xiv. Increase bridge Co Rd E. xv. Finish Path from Cty Rd E to Lake Johanna. xvi. Complete from Old Snelling to Cty E. xvii. Better railings on trail steps. c. Park and Rec Additions i. Permanent rest rooms at parks (2) ii. Add few more benches (2) iii. Lighting needed in Arden Manor Park. iv. Full sized soccer field. v. More parks activities for baby boomers. vi. Add exercise stations. 6 vii. Fishing Pier on Valentine Lake, d. Park Maintenance i. Maintain/preserve and expand (2) ii. Redo Valentine Hills Park. iii. Arden Manor Park maintenance (2) e. Better/more trail and park signage (2) f. Safer trails g, Other i. Clean up graffiti. ii. Good that involved Boston Scientific in Cummings renovations (upkeep and update). Hi. Encourage other business to get involved. iv. Water the boulevard on Hwy 96 - keeping it green, Shoreview sure looks greener. v. I have no favorite park - we need a large enough park for trails such as TCAAP. vi. Better access to Lakes. 6. Lexington Avenue and County Road E currently serve as the commercial center of Arden Hills. What could be done to this area to make it better serve Arden Hills residents? a. Small Area plan (3) b. Retail/Office i. Variety of retail and small businesses (4) ii. No Chains stores (6) c. Restaurant i. Sit down restaurant (4) ii. More restaurants Hi. No (fast food or big box retail) iv. Panera, Barnes & Noble d. Transportation/traffic i. Mass transit (2) ii. Retime the light at Co. Rd. E & Lexington - Can't get around the corner sometimes. iii. Traffic on the corner of E and Lexington is horrific/terrible - I work on that corner-lots of accidents - horns blowing. iv. Better traffic patterns. v. Hard to get to with traffic. vi. Railroad tracks cause problems. vii. Divided Blvd. viii. No more curb cuts. ix. Less traffic. e. Pedestrian i. Need sidewalks to Co Rd E and Lexington to Cub area. ii. Widen Bridge at County Rd E/Hwy 51 with sidewalk (2) 7 iii. More friendly to pedestrians (3) iv. Walking paths on both sides, more accessible for the ageing. v. Walking across Snelling. vi. Bike Trail along Lexington. f. Environment i. ii. iii. iv. v. vi. vii. viii. g. Other i. ii. iii. iv. v. Keep the green trees that are there. It's green! - No more parking spaces. Increase tree percentage. Higher curb appeal. Parking areas have trees & greenery in them No main street. Small town feeling - main street area. Save some green space. Higher environmental ethics, Lexington R.R. crossing - what about a post office there. Covert Holiday Inn to senior housing. Fall Community Event. High power circuit boxes. Develop property on both north and south of Co Rd E & Lex. 7. What are you biggest concerns about the future of Arden Hills? a. TCAAP i. TCAAP - too high density - need low density and variety of housing (3) ii. TCAAP pollution (2) iii. Too much money spent on TCAAP (2) iv. Keep a large portion of TCAAP natural (2) v. What will happen to TCAAP? vi. Concern that the future of TCAAP will not utilize all the planning & vision expanded on it thus far. vii. TCAAP developed new real downtown of Arden Hills. viii. Link TCAAP with the rest of Arden Hills. ix. TCAAP development plan is too complicated to figure out & makes access to Arden Manor more difficult for emergency vehicles. x. Stores in TCAAP have "small town ambiance" xi. On TCAAP have a community gathering space. b. Transportationrrraffic i. Traffic Problems/Congestion (8) ii. Hwy 10 & 96 concept plan isn't a good plan (2) iii. Overcrowding on side streets. iv. 96/10/35 Highway issues. v. 35 W /Hwy1 0/694 traffic, why do we have to be responsible. 8 vi. Need mass transit vii. Transportation - new users of energy. viii. Freeway noise. ix. Sound barrier along hwy 96 x. Bridges in AH. c. Arden Manor displacement concerns - no redevelopment (2) d. Environment (not TCMP) i. Losing green space (3) ii. Storm water going into the lakes. iii. Noise. iv. Houses that fully fill up a lot & don't leave enough green space. e. Housing i. Affordable housing (3) ii. Including quality housing. iii. Houses (restrict size, variances and permits). iv. We want family homes. v. Limit renters. f. Business i. Chain commercial stores the big ones. ii. Retail curbs appeal. iii. Get rid of Blue Fox & Big Ten. iv. No more fast food places. v. Appropriate development of Co Rd E & Lexington. vi. Too much large commercial development. vii. Businesses that bring in taxes. g. Not enough interconnecting trails. h. Taxes i. Property Taxes to high (3) ii. Sustainable tax base. iii. Lack of adequate tax base to support big plans for the future of A.H. i. Education i. Need to keep school system good. ii. Better utilization of colleges. iii. Keeping the library. j. Aging i. Aging population. ii. Community that will serve mature citizens concerns - transportation etc, k. General Development/Redevelopment i. Building too big to fast, we aren't St. Paul. ii. Over development of land etc. iii. Increased Density. iv. Becoming stale/need to shop elsewhere. 9 v. Minimal building signage, I. Other i. Gathering Place (2) ii. Keep crime rate low (2) iii. Post office. iv. Maintaining Public infrastructure. 8. What is not in Arden Hills today that you would like to see here in the next twenty years? a. Transportation/traffic i. Need mass transit access (6) ii. If we move away from individual car transportation - have services closer to residents. iii. Effort to encourage state to improve 694/35W (2) iv. Less traffic v. Better traffic control. vi. More street sweeping. b. Environment i. Alternative Power sources (3) ii. More green space (3) iii. Tree retention policy (3) iv. Clean water. v. Applying "Green" Criteria. vi. High environmental ethics. c. Parks & Trails i. More lake access - i.e. Valentine Lake, ii. Trail around lakes. iii. Total connected trail system. iv. Neighborhoods more connected. v. Connected trails/paths multi user. vi. Better walking trails - sidewalks especially along Lexington & Co. Rd. E. as the area changes. vii. Safety crossings. viii. Soccer/sports area. ix. More parks/shelters. d. Services i. Post Office (3) ii. Restaurants (2) iii. New Library (2) iv. Mixture of retail & restaurants for residents to use. v. Shops and services. vi. More fastfood. vii. Municipal liquor store. viii. Community Social services for senior citizens in-meals on wheels. Senior housing near city hub. 10 e. Housing i. Greater diversity of low density housing stock (owner occupied). ii. Modern manufactured home communities - possibly in TCMP. iii. More affordable housing. iv. Architectural guidelines. v. Life cycle housing. vi. Preservation of traditional neighborhoods. f. City-wide wireless internet (4) g. Community Character i. Stand out as a quaint community as Falcon heights, Highland Park & Como area has done. ii. Maintain Arden Hills as a residential community. iii. Resist the urge to be like everyone else. h. Community Spaces i. Community center (5) ii. Amphitheatre/Band shell (2) iii. Community Gathering Space (Outdoor). iv. City outdoor pool. v. Community art events. i. Economy i. Need a well-balanced business center variety. ii. Major Corporate presence - support for tax base. iii. Rezone IFLEX district. iv. Main Street. v. Downtown Arden Hills. vi. TCMP - sustainable tax base. j. Schools i. Continuation of excellent schools. ii. Partners with school system. k. Other i. No smoking in County parks, ii. Safe environment - low crime, iii. Integrate TCMP - (not new Arden Hills vs. old Arden Hills) iv. Street Cleaning. v. Lack of Diversity. vi. Improvement of infrastructure. 11