Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-28-08-R ~ ~~HILLS Approved: February 25, 2008 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 28, 2008; 7:00 PM ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Harpstead called to order the regular City Council meeting at 7:00 p.m. Present: Mayor Stan Harpstead; Councilmembers David Grant, Brenda Holden, Fran Holmes, and David McClung. Absent: None. Also present: Interim City Administrator Jim Willis; Assistant City Administrator Noah Simon; Public Works Director Gregory Hoag; Finance Director Susan Iverson; Civil Engineer Kristine Giga; Planner James Lehnhoff, Planner Meagan Beekman; Jim Tolaas, Ramsey County Public Works; Chris Roy, Mn/DOT; Stacie Kvilvang, Ehlers & Associates; and Recording Secretary Dianna Wise. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Councilmember Grant requested that Item 6A, Maxfield Study, be added as Item G and Item 7B, CIP, be added as Item H on the Consent Agenda. Councilmember McClung clarified that individuals wishing to be heard must speak during Item 3 - Public Inquiries/Informational. MOTION: Councilmember Grant moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a motion to approve the meeting agenda as amended. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - January 28,2008 2 2. PRESENTATIONS Mayor Harpstead read a proclamation and presented a plaque to Mr. David Sand for his years of service on the Planning Commission. 3. PUBLIC INQUlRlES/INFORMATIONAL Ms. Christy Effinger, 1969 Banyon Street, Secretary, Arden Manor Residents Association, presented copies and read a binding resolution for consideration between the City of Arden Hills and Arden Manor Manufactured Home Park. She also presented copies of a petition with the signatures of 193 residents of Arden Manor. Mayor Harpstead commented these documents would be referred to the City Attorney for review. Ms. Cheryl Fish, 2059 Arden Manor, brought attention to an article in the Pioneer Press relative to less homes being impacted. Ms. Debra Rossback, 1961 Banyon Street, stated she understood the residents were supposed to have a chance to vote on the concept plan rather than just Council and Mn/DOT. Mr. Don Meyers, 4642 Prior Circle, stated he had hoped to see the owners of the park at this meeting. Ms. Effinger replied that she received an email from the park owner in support of the residents. Mr. Patrick McLafferty, President - Arden Manor Residents Association, commented he believes the City has been less than candid with the residents. He stated that ten years ago the Comprehensive Plan declared Arden Manor an eyesore and Council wanted to get rid of it. He stated none of the residents of Arden Manor received a notification of the vote being taken. He stated there seems to be no concern for a sound barrier and the potential speed of traffic. Mayor Harpstead clarified that the current Councihnembers were not part of Council ten years ago and could not be quoted on the earlier Comprehensive Plan. Ms. Chris Lustig, 1901 Todd Drive, stated there was a public commitment to keep the residents of Arden Manor informed. She requested a response on why the earlier plan was voted down. She expressed concern over the lack of communication between the City and the residents of Arden Manor. She pointed out the City is displacing families. She stated that a number of the residents haye lived in Arden Manor for eleven years ormoreand many are senior citizens. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - January 28,2008 3 Mr. Daniel Wilson, 1878 Todd Drive, urged Council to consider more than what is best for the City, and to consider the residents that this project would displace. Mr. Philip Juris, 4619 Lisa Court, explained why he moved to Arden Hills. He stated the residents would like to be clear on what is being voted on. Ms. Mona Langston, Housing Preservation Project, explained the impact this project would have on the residents. Mayor Harpstead replied the displaced residents would also receive a benefit for the replacement value. Mr. Gary Babcock, 1913 Todd Court, questioned how he would be able to find affordable housing, indicating he wanted to stay in Arden Manor. Mr. Dave Block, 1901 Todd Drive, presented examples of the community feeling and the great neighbors that exist in this park. He expressed his anger over this project. Mr. Frank Stodola, 1281 Karth Lake Circle, urged the Council to act upon the current plan. He stated the real details come out in the planning cycle. Mrs. Susan Amos Palmer, 1717 Gramsie Road, stated she would not be displaced, she has been in the city for 20 years, affordable housing is needed, and that the residents deserve a way to fmd affordable housing in the City. Mr. Duane Shearer, 1926 Todd Drive, stated he did not believe this project would help. He stated the residents of Arden Manor deserve to live where they do as they could not afford another home. Mr. Paul Legrid, 4797 Highway 10 (Scherer Brothers Lumber), stated he believes it is important to let people know that trucks steadily leave the property as well as about 100 vehicles exiting onto Highway 10. He stated that as a business, they support a plan that would make it safe to enter and exit the property. Mrs. Eva Storm, 4572 Prior Court, commented she loves where she lives and asked if Council has taken into consideration what is entailed in moving from this location. Mr. Patrick Haik, 1550 Briarknoll Circle, supported the points made by the residents of Arden Manor. He commented he had the documentation concerning the projected traffic volume of 80,000 cars trafficking on Highway 10 should this project move forward. He commented this number did not include the increase in traffic caused by TCAAP. He stated he is puzzled as to why they are here again as last spring this was tabled in order to resolve issues. He stated the plan is the same one the residents objected to nine months ago. He stated he believes the developer is driving the bus and driving this project down the City's throat. He read from page 30 of the Comprehensive Plan under Housing that the number one goal is to preserve the integrity and quality of residential neighborhoods. He questioned how the plan under consideration would do this. He stated the comments ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - January 28,2008 4 that various plans were considered are incorrect as only one plan has been reviewed. He indicated he would like an independent traffic engineer to adequately represent the residents. He stated he hoped Council would vote no. Mr. Bruce Mann, 1165 Amble Drive, stated it is time to recognize the information brought forward. He stated this intersection is dangerous. He stated there are residents who see value in the development of TCAAP. Mr. Chuck Mertensotto, 3473 Lake Johanna Boulevard, stated he contacted City Commissioners and some expressed disagreement over the plan. He displayed a map of the Highway 10/ County Road 96 Interchange Concept and spoke to specific details. He referenced the dollar value for alternate uses of the Arden Manor property. He stated the current plan makes it difficult to work with Met Council. He commented that he resides in a city that lives on welfare because it did not want to pay for anything. He questioned whether the money to replace the homes is in the budget. Ms. Lisa Johnson, 3431 Lake Johanna Boulevard, stated she objects to the project and urged the Council to vote no. Mr. Richard Turgeon, 1777 V enus Avenue, stated he opposes this plan and alternatives should be considered. He urged Council to find a solution that did not cause harm to the residents of Arden Manor. Mr. Tom Valaud, 1463 Arden View Drive, stated he is in support of the residents of Arden Manor. He stated he did not understand why the footprint of County Road 96 needed to be wider. He stated he also did not understand the need for the frontage road to be on the west side of Highway 10. He stated the access bridge is needed for Scherer Brothers; however, he questions the location. He commented he would like to see this information on the website. Mr. Domick Rouse, 1943 Todd Drive, questioned what the actual economic advantage is to the expansion of the highways. Mr. Ed Yon Holten, 1409 Indian Oaks Trail, stated that he listened to the residents of Arden Manor and finds merit with their concerns; however, the City Council has worked hard to resolve this problem. He stated there is also a serious safety issue on County Road 96. He stated Arden Hills is becoming a suburb and Council has done everything it could to minimize the impact on the residents. Mrs. Betty Schlatthauer, Arden View Drive, commented she has lived in Arden Hills for many years and it disturbs her that the City would displace nearly 200 residents. She commented that justice is not being served if other options are not considered. Mr. Scott Tolsen, 1321 Wyncrest Court, urged Council to consider the traffic and other impacts on the homes south of County Road 96. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - January 28,2008 5 Mr. Russ Adams, Director, Alliance for Metropolitan Stability, stated the expectation of residents is that they were still in negotiations. He commented that no amount of compensation to the residents of Arden Hills would give them what they need to remain in Arden Hills. He explained the premise of the proposed resolution presented to Council. He urged Council to understand this could be the opening for the future of Arden Manor Manufactured Home Park as an R4 district. He pointed out that TCAAP includes no viable plan to replace affordable housing. He stated a housing replacement policy is needed in Arden Hills. He urged the Council not to give away the strongest leverage position. Mr. John Van Buren, 4276 Colleen Circle, commented on the housing market, access to roadways, additional traffic from TCAAP, safety, and traffic detouring through the neighborhoods. He urged Council to vote on behalf of the current residents who voted each of them into office. Ms. Effinger presented a proposed concept plan developed by Mr. D. R. Santerra for review by staff. Mr. Chris V osbeek, 1553 Briarknoll Drive, stated the citizens deserve a reply from Council and to be heard. He questioned whether alternatives have been considered. 4. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Claims and Payroll B. Motion to Approve the Seventh Amendment to the TCAAP Offer to Purchase C. Motion to Approve Planning Case 08-001for a Site Plan Review and Height Variance at 3275 Lake Johanna Blvd., Based on the Findings of Fact and the Submitted Plans, as Amended by the Six Conditions in the January 9, 2008, Planning Case Report D. Motion to Approve Planning Case 08-002 for a Variance at 1249 Tiller Lane, Based on the Findings of Fact and the Submitted Plans as Amended by the Six Conditions in the January 9,2008, Plauning Case Report E. Motion to Approve Payment #4 to Margolis Company in the Amount of $10,873.96 for the CSAH 96 Landscape and Irrigation Improvement Project F. Motion to Authorize Staff to Enter into an Agreement with GoodPointe Technology to Perform the 2008 Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Survey G. Motion to Accept the Maxfield Housing Report H. Motion to Approve CIP 2008-2012 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) MOTION: Councilmember Grant moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a motion to approve the Consent Calendar and to authorize execution of all necessary documents contained therein. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - January 28,2008 6 5. PULLED AGENDA ITEMS None 6. NEW BUSINESS }., "\eeept the Maxfield HOllsiBf: Report 7. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. Motion to Approve Resolution No. 2008-08 Supportinl! the July 23, 2007 Concept Plan for State Hil!hwav 10 and County Road 96 Improvemeut Pro i ect Ms. StacIE Kvilvang, Ehlers & Associates, presented information on the Concept Plan for the State Highway 10 and County Road 96 Improvement Project. She explained that the decision before Council is not the last decision on the project and Council would not be committing to any specific solution. She stated the concept plan brought forward for approval is a "worst case" scenario. She indicated that Council input is taken into consideration before going forward. Ms. Kvilvang explained that the concept plan meets the principles outlined by Council and insures that major safety concerns would be addressed. She stressed that it is vital to get to the next step in design process to identify impacts in order to answer questions. She stated approval of the plan would allow Ramsey County to move forward with a project that they have committed funding for. She stated that Council would have additional opportunities to review plans at various stages in the design process. Conncilmember Holmes emphasized that the design phase would include minimizing the impact and provides opportunities for change. Mr. Chris Roy, Mn/DOT, explained the concept plan. He stated that going forward, standards required to be met are taken into account. He explained that the profile and elevation is also taken into consideration to balance impacts to the City and traffic operations. Councilmember Holmes stated the access road through Arden Manor is not set and could be changed. She commented that the City Engineers have been involved with this project and would continue to be involved. Councilmember Grant commented that property values and a number of other items are important to him. He read the parameters presented to the developers. He commented he would like to start with a better case scenario and that this concept plan did not reduce the impact to Arden Manor. He stated the City needs to get to specifics so it would know how to help residents. He stated a plan that addresses the initial concerns is needed and ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - January 28, 2008 7 the City needs some leverage. He questioned staff as to why it is coming back with the "worst case" scenario. Public Works Director Hoag explained staffhas worked with Mn/DOT and determined this was the best starting point to minimize the impacts. He stated a concept is needed to minimize the impacts. He stated they did not know what to add in or take out until they get to the next step. Councilmember Grant stated it was his understanding that three plans would come back to Council; however, one plan with two options for phasing was presented. Pnblic Works Director Hoag explained the reasoning for this. Councilmember Grant questioned that if this was the only plan and it was designed July 23, 2007, why were the other plans presented and why did it take so long. Mr. Roy replied the City asked them to look at it. He stated this was done and different variations of the Diamond Interchange concept were presented. He displayed an aerial view of the design and explained the variations and the two phasing options at the interchange. Mayor Harpstead questioned the future traffic volumes on Highway 10/County Road 96. Mr. Roy replied that traffic analysis, forecasting, and modeling were conducted. He explained the results of these studies. He stated there is a severe safety issue at the intersection of Highway 10 and County Road 96 that needs to be addressed. He pointed out this intersection is ranked number 21 in severity statewide. Mayor Harpstead directed staff to post this information on the website. Mayor Harpstead questioned the need to bridge over for Scherer Brothers and the reason for the frontage road to be located on the west side rather than east. Mr. Roy replied that a bridge over would require grade separation, an elevation over 25 feet higher than Highway 10 and require 800 feet of run out. He stated there is not enough room for a landing on Scherer Brothers to do this. Mayor Harpstead questioned the frontage road south of the intersection to access County Road 96. Pnblic Works Director Hoag replied that if it was possible to work with the wells, moving the frontage road to the east would be considered and evaluated. Councilmember McClung stated there appear to be five wells that would be impacted. Mr. Roy replied there would be an opportunity to minimize the impact to the wells. Councilmember Holden questioned the reason for the stop sign at McDonalds in Moundsview. Mr. Roy explained about half the traffic would go through the traffic signal onto Highway 10. He indicated a safety analysis would be conducted to evaluate the location of the traffic signal. He stated the safety issues at County Road Hand Highway 10 are not as severe as at the County Road 96/Highway 10 intersection. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - January 28,2008 8 Councilmember Holden questioned who is responsible to bring the process forward on the top 25 similar intersections. Mr. Roy replied with examples. He explained the various funding options for this project. Mn/DOT funding is in the form of in-kind. Councilmember Holden questioned what percentage of the pavement would be concrete versus bituminous to reduce the sound. Mr. Roy replied the difference in sound would be only three or less decibels. He stated Mn/DOT would study the noise walls along with the 694 project. Mayor Harpstead questioned how this project would interact with the 694 project. Mr. Roy displayed a design of the proposed concept for Highways 694 and 10 and County Road 96. He explained the advanced design of the project. Mayor Harpstead requested a description of phasing. Mr. Roy explained the project could be spread out over months, years, or decades depending on need, desire, and funding. Councilmember Grant questioned, if squared intersections are safer, why this was not designed to be as squared as possible. Mr. Roy replied there would be retaining walls along the westerly side up the ramp and a natural slope along the easterly side which would be a cost savings. Councilmember Grant commented the homes indicated in green on the aerial photo would be moved and asked for an explanation as to why this is important. Mr. Jim Tolaas, Ramsey County Public Works, commented they were told by the Minnesota Pollution Control agency, based on the environmental study and the recommendations of state and federal environmental organizations, that Round Lake must to be avoided relative to excavation or filling due to the contamination. He stated that identifying 13 to 17 mobile homes would be the minimum and they are willing to work to reduce the impact to Arden Manor property owners. Mayor Harpstead requested that Mr. Tolaas speak about the road features. Discussion ensued on the road features and design of Highway 10 and County Road 96. Councilmember McClung stated the September 17, 2007 design indicates less impact to Arden Manor and questioned why this plan could not be used. Public Works Director Hoag replied this plan did not provide access to Scherer Brothers, which would be a fatal flaw and not approved by Mn/DOT. Councilmember Holden questioned what the City's rights are relative to local access. Mr. Roy replied the plan would provide opportunities to maximize access. He explained the safety concerns with the right-iniright-out to Scherer Brothers from Highway 10. He stated this could be reviewed during the design phase. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - January 28,2008 9 Councilmember Grant stated this plan could work if Scherer Brothers access could be resolved. He questioned whether this has been looked at enough. He stated that if the wheels are set in motion, he would like to start with a plan closer to what the City wants. Councilmember Grant addressed the noise and speed of large trucks. Mr. Roy replied that banning trucks on that portion of Highway 10; would likely be fought in the courts and Mn/DOT would not support this idea. MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Grant seconded a motion to extend the meeting until 10:45 p.rn. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). MOTION: Mayor Harpstead moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a motion to Approve Resolution No. 2008-08, a Resolution Supporting the July 23, 2007 Concept Plan for State Highway 10 and County Road 96 Improvement Project. Councilmember Holmes stated the resolution needs rewording; however, the decision is whether Council believes the July 23,2007, plan should move forward to the next step. Councilmember Holden stated that she has many questions that need to be answered. She stated she could not vote for this concept plan at this time. Councilmember Grant questioned whether this is where they should start. He expressed concern in that the request to minimize impact to Arden Manor is not apparent in this plan. He assured the residents of Arden Manor that they are trying to reduce the impact; however, some land would need to be taken. He mentioned the issue of noise, grade separation, traffic, and TCAAP. He stressed that Council hears the concerns of the residents of Arden Manor and this has been a difficult project. Councilmember McClung stated he did not believe this is the plan to start with. He pointed out Mn/DOT's job is to design roads. He stated more effort needs to be put into what is needed, what could be lived with, and the trade offs. He stated he could not support this at this time. Councilmember Holmes commented it would be value added to have an independent consultant look at this. She believes the July 23, 2007, plan is not the right plan to start with. Mayor Harpstead stated this is the most appropriate point to start from and understands the impacts on the community, the flow through the area, and the environmental impacts. He stated the opportunities need to be described in an engineering process rather than an exercise of drawing pictures on satellite maps. He commented that Mn/DOT and SEH have the highest interest of the people and City in mind. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - January 28,2008 10 Councilmember Holden commented that County Road 96 would happen and the impact could be minimized. She stated she has concern with the frontage road on the interior of Arden Manor. She stated TCAAP is important to Arden Hills and the residents. The motion failed (1-4). (Mayor Harpstead) B. Motion to Approve CIP 2ggg 2g12 C1. Motion to Approve Ordinance 2008-001 in Planninl! Case 07-025 to Amend Section 1305.04, Repeal Section 1325.10, and Adopt Section 1325.12 of the zoninl! Code Rel!ardinl! Recreational Vehicles, Utility Trailers, and Watercraft Outdoor Storal!e, as Presented in the Januarv 28, 2008, Planninl! Case Memo to the Citv Council Planner Beekman presented the changes to Ordinance 2008-001. Councilmember Holmes stated she had a problem with designating a riding lawnmower as an RV. City Attorney Filla indicated the wording could be redone to clarify the ordinance. MOTION: Councilmember Grant moved and Councilmember McClung seconded a motion to Approve Ordinance 2008-001 in Planning Case 07-025 to Amend Section 1305.04, Repeal Section 1325.10, and Adopt Section 1325.12 of the zoning Code Regarding Recreational Vehicles, Utility Trailers, and Watercraft Outdoor Storage, as Presented in the January 28, 2008, Planning Case Memo to the City Council. Councilmember Holmes moved and Councilmember Holden seconded, to amend the motion to add the definition of riding lawnmowers, where appropriate. The amendment carried unanimously (5-0). The motion carried unanimously (5-0). C2. Motion to Approve Publishinl! a Summary of Ordinance 2008-001 for Recreational Vehicles, Utility Trailers, and Watercraft Outdoor Storal!e as Permitted bv Minnesota State Statute 412.191 Subd. 4. MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Mayor Harpstead seconded a motion to Approve Publishing a Summary of Ordinance 2008-001 for Recreational Vehicles, Utility Trailers, and Watercraft Outdoor Storage as Permitted by Minnesota State Statute 412.191 Subd. 4. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - January 28,2008 11 D. TCAAP Update Ms. Stacy Kvilvang, Ehlers & Associates, presented an update and overview on TCAAP to include information on acquisition of TCAAP property, Highway 10/County Road 96, the market study, the communication strategy, and the engineering consultant report. She recommended that the engineering consultants be included on discussions regarding the design of Highway 1 O/County Road 96. Mayor Harpstead stated the engineering consultants would continue to provide input on Highway lO/County Road 96. He noted the need of a water tower is becoming more evident. He invited Ms. Kvilvang to work joint efforts with the Army National Gaurd. Councilmember Grant reported there are two towers. He stated that one is 500,000 gallons and the other is 1 million gallons. E. 911 Communications Dispatch Update Public Works Director Hoag stated he is still in the process of gathering the data and would forward it on. He stated that there have been no further issues. He mentioned that Sheriff Fletcher is attempting to gather similar data. Councilmember Holden questioned whether a letter should go forward to the County Manager and the County Commissioner. Mayor Harpstead agreed and tasked staff to do so. MOTION: Councilmember Holmes moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a motion to extend the meeting until 11 :00 p.m. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). 8. COUNCIL COMMENTS AND REQUESTS Interim City Administrator Willis commented some efforts have been made for potential funding of the 10/96 intersection. He stated that by the terms of the vote taken, it would make those bonding requests essentially moot. He explained this sets the proj ect back at least one year. He pointed out the consequences of the action could put the TCAAP project in distress. Councilmember Holmes questioned when this needs to be approved. Interim City Administrator Willis explained the impact and the Issues with State funding. Councilmember Holden commented that County Road 96 be minimized to whatever could be done, south of the bridge be eliminated, the number of lanes be limited to what is needed now, and the hub into Arden Manor be minimized. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - January 28,2008 12 Councilmember Grant commented he would like to see the impact be minimized on Arden Manor, that County Road 96 needs to stay to the south, the interchange to Arden Manor needs to be light, the exchange could hug Highway 10 tighter, the plans could be tailored to minimize the impacts, and he is concerned about the noise. Councilmember McClung commented it is important to minimize the impact to Arden Manor. He expressed concerned over sound issues beyond this project. Councilmember Holmes commented she would like to explore the option to hire an engineering firm take the July 23 and September 17, 2007 plans and develop a plan that ensures the City's interests are protected. Discussion ensued. 9. ADJOURN MOTION: Councilmember McClung moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a motion to adjourn the meeting. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). ed the Regular City Council Meeting at 10:56 p.m. J-- - Ji Willis erim City Administrator CITY OF ARDEN HILLS REQUEST TO APPEAR BEFORE: '!Tt CITY COUNCIL/ PLANNING COMMISSION -ARQEN HILLS If you wish to address the City Council or Planning Commission, please follow-the suggestions listed below. Thank you. (PLEASE PRINT) Date to kwz' Name 7 Phone Address .� w I�'�'►��'"' � � q-� q _� IV Agenda Item you wish to address Company of Individual Representing(if applicable) � uox- A "-6 , Note: Please complete this form so that you may be recognized at the appropriate time on the Agenda. You are under no obligation to speak if you decide against it during the meeting. Please state your full name, address and phone number so the record of your comments will be complete in the minutes of this meeting. Thank you. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS REQUEST TO APPEAR BEFORE: CITY COUNCIL/ PLANNING COMMISSION WREN HILLS If you wish to address the City Council or Planning Commission, please follow the suggestions listed below. Thank you. (PLEASE PRINT) Date 0 D Name Phone Address Agenda Item you wish to address Company of Individual Representing(if applicable) Note: Please complete this form so that you may be recognized at the appropriate time on the Agenda. You are under no obligation to speak if you decide against it during the meeting. Please state your full name, address and phone number so the record of your comments will be complete in the minutes of this meeting. Thank you. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS 'It REQUEST TO APPEAR BEFORE: CITY COUNCIL/ PLANNING COMMISSION -ARQEN HILLS If you wish to address the City Council or Planning Commission, please follow the suggestions listed below. Thank you. (PLEASE PRINT) Date / Name Phone -1 . 1 -1 1 1 - - - --............. Address pl—PtZ4 / .......... Agenda item you wish to address i-X41tj - - - Company of Individual Representing(if applicable) Note: Please complete this form so that you may be recognized at the appropriate time on the Agenda. You are under no obligation to speak if you decide against it during the meeting. Please state your full name, address and phone number so the record of your comments will be complete in the minutes of this meeting. Thank you. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS REQUEST TO APPEAR BEFORE: CITY COUNCIL/ PLANNING COMMISSION �-AIEN HILLS If you wish to address the City Council or Planning Commission, please follow the suggestions listed below. Thank you. (PLEASE PRINT) Date t ,g I- Name`n- "�N� Phone Agenda Item you wish to address Company of Individual Representing (if applicable) 'L Note: Please complete this form so that you may be recognized at the appropriate time on the Agenda. You are under no obligation to speak if you decide against it during the meeting. Please state your full name, address and phone number so the record of your comments will be complete in the minutes of this meeting. Thank you. CITY OF ARDEN HILLS REQUEST TO APPEAR BEFORE: RPFN HjLLS CITY COUNCIL/ PLANNING COMMISSION �RZEN If you wish to address the City Council or Planning Commission, please follow the suggestions listed below. Thank you. (PLEASE PRINT) F - 1 Phone (.$► �5 ���t,�Y��,c, � `�� Address Agenda Item you wish to address Company f Individual Representing(if applicable p a.nb e. Sv5 Lk"Ab f 0O` Note: Please complete this form so that you may be recognized at the appropriate time on the Agenda. You are under no obligation to speak if you decide against it during the meeting. Please state your full name, address and phone number so the record of your comments will be complete in the minutes of this meeting.Thank you.