Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-25-08-R Approved: March 10, 2008 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING FEBRUARY 25, 2008; 7:00 PM ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDERJROLL CALL Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor Harpstead called to order the regular City Council meeting at 7:00 p.m. Present: Mayor Stan Harpstead; Councilmembers Brenda Holden, Fran Holmes, and David McClung. Absent: Councilmember David Grant (excused). Also present: Interim City Administrator Jim Willis; Assistant City Administrator Noah Simon; Public Works Director Gregory Hoag; Finance Director Susan Iverson; Planner James Lehnhoff; Planner I Meagan Beekman; Parks and Recreation Manager Michelle Olson; and Recording Secretary Barbara Hughes. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Councilmember McClung requested that agenda items 4C and 4D be pulled from the consent calendar for discussion. MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Mayor Harpstead seconded a motion to approve the meeting agenda as amended. The motion carried unanimously (4-0). 2. PUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL Mayor Harpstead stated that Senator Chaudhary and Representative Knuth notified him they were in committee meetings and may not be able to attend this evening's Council meeting. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - February 25,2008 2 Sean Hemstad appeared before the City Council and stated he is with Boy Scout Troop #408. He indicated he is two merit badges away from receiving his Eagle Scout and is present this evening to obtain his community merit badge. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. January 22. 2008 City Council Worksession Mayor Harpstead requested that page I of the January 22, 2008, City Council Worksession Minutes be amended to reflect that Councilmember Holmes left the meeting at 9: 15 p.m. Councilmember Holden requested that the fifth paragraph on page 3 of the January 22, 2008, City Council Worksession Minutes be amended to state "Mr. Roy replied the lead agency would be in charge and the lead agency in this case would be the City of Arden Hills." B. Januarv 28. 2008 Rel!ular City Council Meetinl! Mayor Harpstead requested that the third paragraph on page 3 of the January 28, 2008, Regular City Council Meeting Minutes be amended to delete the word "depreciated" in the last sentence. C. February 11. 2008 Rel!ular City Council Meetinl! Councilmember Holmes requested that the third full paragraph on page 12 of the February I I, 2008, Regular City Council Meeting Minutes be amended to clarify that it was the consensus of the City Council that a ban on the burning of clean wood would not be discussed at this time. D. February 13.2008 Special City Council Worksession No changes. MOTION: Councilmember McClung moved and Councilmember Holden seconded a motion to approve the January 22, 2008, City Council Worksession Minutes, as amended, the January 28, 2008, Regular City Council Meeting Minutes, as amended, the February I I, 2008, Regular City Council Meeting Minutes, as amended, and the February 13, 2008, Special City Council Worksession Minutes, as presented. The motion carried unanimously (4-0). 4. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Claims and Payroll B. Motion to Approve Planning Case 07-029 for a Variance at 1455 Skiles Lane, Based on the Findings of Fact and the Submitted Plans, as Amended by the Six Conditions in the February 25,2008 Planning Case Report ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - February 25, 200S 3 E. Motion to Adopt Resolution 200S- 15: Resolution Supporting the Minnesota DNR Local Trail Connection Grant Application for the Perry Park Regional Trail Connection F. Motion to Approve the City of Arden Hills Fund Balance Policy as Recommended by the Financial Planning and Analysis Committee G. Motion to Approve Plans and Specifications and Authorize Advertisement for Bid for the Ridgewood-Asbury Rain Garden Improvements MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Mayor Harpstead seconded a motion to approve the Consent Calendar and to authorize execution of all necessary documents contained therein. The motion carried unanimously (4-0). 5. PULLED CONSENT ITEMS 4C. Motion to Approve Earnest Monev Refund to Roval Oaks Realty Councilmember Holmes asked if further discussion regarding this item should be held in a closed session given the attorney-client privilege of the memo from the City Attorney, and added it will be difficult for the City Council to discuss this matter without getting into the memo. Interim City Administrator Willis explained that the refund request on its face is simple in terms of the request on the part of Mr. Eibensteiner, the developer who entered into a purchase agreement with the City in June 2006 for the former City Hall/Public Works site on Highway 96. He stated that the developer, prior to the closing date, informed the City that they were not proceeding with the purchase because of some of the development conditions imposed by the City, and the developer had the right to back out of the purchase. He added the memo from the City Attorney covers the legal issues related to the refund request and if the City Council wishes to discuss this further, it should be discussed in a closed session. Councilmember McClung expressed his concern that there should be some language contained in future purchase agreements that indicates when a developer can pull out of a purchase when the City has already taken action. He noted at the time of the original purchase agreement, the City Council, with the recommendation of the Planning Commission, approved the PUD with a number of conditions, which the developer agreed to. He stated it was his impression that the only thing that changed was that there was an election and the face of the City Council was going to change, and apparently this change in the City Council would provide little or no opportunity for the developer to come back and get the changes he would like. He indicated this situation did not sit well with him and stated the City needs to be more careful in the future. Mayor Harpstead concurred. MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Mayor Harpstead seconded a motion to approve the earnest money refund to Royal Oaks Realty. The motion carried unanimously (4-0). ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - February 25,2008 4 4D. Motion to Approve a Resolution ReQuestine: Comprehensive Road and Transit Fundin!?:: Supportine: the Leae:ue of Minnesota Cities 2008 Transportation Fundine: Policv Statement Interim City Administrator Willis explained this is a resolution drafted by the League of Minnesota Cities seeking to unite the communities of Minnesota behind this project to ensure adequate funding. He stated that Governor Pawlenty vetoed the transportation bill, but the House and Senate both overrode the veto; this resolution was prepared before that occurred. He noted that the City Council's adoption of the resolution would indicate the City Council's approval of the bilL Councilmember McClung stated that given the events of the past week and particularly the events of today, he would have liked the opportunity to talk about this resolution in a worksession or regular meeting. He stated there are items contained in the resolution that he does not support. He indicated the City Council has not previously had a policy in place for these types of resolutions and requested an opportunity to discuss this at a future worksession meeting. Mayor Harpstead stated that from time to time, the City Council is required to weigh in as it pertains to other branches of government and one of the main priorities the City Council has had to address is transportation and the issue of transportation as it relates to other governmental agencIes. Councilmember McClung reiterated his concern that the City Council did not have an opportunity to discuss the resolution before this evening and stated he is not able to support it. MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a motion to table action on the Resolution Requesting Comprehensive Road and Transit Funding. The motion carried (3- I Mayor Harpstead). 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Consider Approvine: Resolution 2008-14 for the Vacation of Three Easements as Part of the Final Plat for Christensen Estates (PC #08-003) as Proposed in the February 25. 2008 Memorandum to the City Council Planner I Beekman explained this action is for a vacation of three easements as a condition of approval of the final plat. She stated the three easements to be vacated will be encompassed by a new, larger drainage and utility easement that will be dedicated to the City in the Christensen Estates final plat. She noted the intent of this easement vacation is to clean up the legal description of the property and the final plat is contingent upon approval of these easement vacations. Councilmember Holmes asked when the vacation of these easements will occur. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - February 25,2008 5 Planner I Beekman replied the vacation will occur this evening if the City Council approves the final plat. Councilmember McClung asked if approval of this planning case is contingent upon approval of the final plat. Planner I Beekman replied in the affirmative. Mayor Harpstead opened the public hearing at 7:20 p.m. There being no public input, Mayor Harpstead closed the public hearing at 7:21 p.m. MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Council member Holmes seconded a motion to approve Resolution 2008-14 for the Vacation of Three Easements as Part of the Final Plat for Christensen Estates (PC #08-003) as Proposed in the February 25, 2008 Memorandum to the City Council. Councilmember Holmes requested further clarification of the easement vacation as it relates to agenda item 7 A. Planner I Beekman presented a graphic of the new drainage and utility easements which will encompass all wetlands on the site located on the entire northern tip of the property. The motion carried unanimously (4-0). 7. NEW BUSINESS AI. Motion to Approve Planning Case #08-003 for a Preliminarv and Final Plat of Christensen Estates, Based on the Findings of Fact and the Submitted Plans as Amended bv the Ten Conditions in the February 25, 2008 Planning Case Report Planner I Beekman explained the Planning Commission and City Council approved the preliminary plat for Christensen Estates in July 2007; however, due to issues with the property lines, the applicant was unable to submit a Final Plat application by the October 30, 2007, deadline and the Preliminary Plat approval expired. She stated the applicant has since resubmitted a revised Preliminary and final Plat that reflects the boundary change; the overall proposal to subdivide the 3.08 acre property into four new conforming lots remains largely unchanged. Planner I Beekman stated this property is subject to park dedication fees and staff is recommending a fee of$I3,125. She stated the applicant has submitted a Rice Creek Watershed District approved wetland delineation report, existing conditions map, and preliminary grading plan. She noted that each lot meets the current Zoning Code standards and based on the findings of fact, the Preliminary Plat is in conformance with all zoning and subdivision regulations. She ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - February 25, 2008 6 added the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the Preliminary and Final Plat subject to the ten conditions contained in the planning case report. Councilmember McClung requested further information regarding the park dedication fee. City Planner Lehnhoff explained that when staff first reviewed this property, the value was approximately listed at $30,000 which seemed low for the property; as a result, staff requested an appraisal which determined the current value of the entire property to be $250,000. He stated that state statutes require the City to use the value of the property prior to execution of the final plat when determining park dedication fees, resulting in a maximum park dedication fee for the entire property of $17,500 or $4,375 for each of the lots; however, the City can only charge the fee for three net new lots and exempting one of the lots reduces the maximum park dedication fee to $13,125. He added that staff compared the proposed park dedication fee to recent plat approvals and noted the City cannot go higher than seven percent of the property's land value at the time the final plat is approved based on the subdivision code. He stated at $4,375 per lot, the park dedication fee for Christensen Estates is below the average park dedication fee required in other recently approved plats; however, to stay in conformance with City Code and state statutes, the park dedication fee cannot be raised higher than $4,375 for each of the three net new lots. He indicated the park dedication fee can be reduced by the City Council if deemed appropriate; staff is not recommending reducing the park dedication fee and the applicant is aware of the park dedication fee. Councilmember Holden asked if there were any additions or revisions to the ten conditions. Planner I Beekman stated that the Preliminary Plat approved in July 2007 contained a condition that the Final Plat must be submitted within 90 days of approval of the Preliminary Plat; that condition was removed. She stated that the Preliminary and Final Plat now contain a condition that the lots must meet any landscape and tree preservation requirements, as well as a condition that the lots shall not be graded or cleared prior to the issuance of building or grading permits for a particular lot. Councilmember Holden stated the landscape and tree preservation ordinance has not yet been adopted by the City Council and asked how a developer could be required to comply with a regulation that is not currently in place. Planner I Beekman stated the development of the lots will have to be in accordance with any regulations in place at the time of submittal. City Planner Lehnhoff stated the reason for the condition is to make certain the applicant is aware of the pending landscape and tree preservation ordinance. Mayor Harpstead asked if any trees could be removed from the property prior to obtaining a permit. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - February 25,2008 7 Planner I Beekman replied the applicant would not be allowed to remove any trees from the property until a grading permit is obtained. She added the applicant would also have to obtain an erosion control permit. MOTION: Councilmember McClung moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a motion to approve Planning Case #08-003 for a Preliminary and Final Plat of Christensen Estates, Based on the Findings of Fact and the Submitted Plans as Amended by the Ten Conditions in the February 25, 2008 Planning Case Report. Councilmember Holmes asked if there was any public testimony at the Planning Commission meeting regarding this development. Planner I Beekman replied there was one person who spoke at the Planning Commission meeting and expressed concern regarding the wetlands and the stream, and asked if the City would continue to maintain the stream. She stated that the City will continue to maintain the stream. The motion carried unanimously (4-0). A2. Motion to Approve the Christensen Estates Final Plat Development A!!reement MOTION: Mayor Harpstead moved and Councilmember McClung seconded a motion to approve the Christensen Estates Final Plat Development Agreement. The motion carried unanimously (4-0). B. Discussion on Maiority Votin!! Interim City Administrator Willis presented a memo regarding majority voting and stated the existing Code provides that except as otherwise provided in the Code, or when a different vote is required by law, a majority vote of those present shall be sufficient to approve any question posed to the Council. He stated this would mean that if three Councilmembers are present at a meeting, two votes would provide a majority of that quorum. He indicated the Council has apparently raised the question of whether to revise the Code to state that if only three Councilmembers are present at a given meeting, any vote taken would require a unanimous vote. He stated this would have to be a policy decision of the City CounciL He added that in his experience, where it is generally known based on previous discussions that an issue has some contention associated with it, the Council could defer a vote on the issue (unless the Council is under a timeline imposed by state law) until such time as a sufficient number of Councilmembers are present. Councilmember Holden expressed concern that if only three Councilmembers are present at a meeting where a major decision is going to be made, that only two votes would be required to take action. She added the City has several major decisions forthcoming and she would support a ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - February 25, 2008 8 policy change as it relates to major Council decisions. She asked if the Council could adopt a two tier system for approving consent calendar items versus major items. Mayor Harpstead stated the City Council could adopt a policy without changing the Code where there is an understanding of this body that it will not take action on a specific item unless and until a specified number of Council members are present at a meeting. Councilmember McClung stated he shares Councilmember Holden's concerns and felt it was important to have the full City Council present for votes on major decisions. He added he would support having an agreement among the City Council that if only three Councilmembers are present at a meeting, it will defer taking action until the next meeting. Mayor Harpstead stated if a Councilmember states at the beginning of a meeting that he or she wants to defer action on a particular item, that would be appropriate. Councilmember Holmes stated the City Council has previously discussed with the City Attorney the issue of a Councilmember voting over the phone. She stated the City Attorney has indicated this is permissible. Councilmember McClung noted a Councilmember's vote by phone will count, but will not count towards a quorum. Mayor Harpstead stated the important thing is that a Councilmember express that he or she feels that more people are needed at a meeting in order to vote on a major issue and to request that the action be deferred unless the City Council is under a time constraint. It was the consensus of the City Council to direct staff to summarize the City Council's conversation regarding majority voting and to determine if an appropriate policy regarding majority voting can be implemented. 8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS A. TCAAP Update Interim City Administrator Willis presented a memo from Stacie Kvilvang, Ehlers & Associates and stated that nothing substantive has occurred since the City Council's last meeting. He added that he heard today that the February 27th meeting with Barr Engineering and the consultants has been postponed. He explained that representatives from Ryan have expressed concern about the information to be exchanged and made public at this time. Councilmember Holden asked how this will impact the timeline with GSA. Interim City Administrator Willis stated this will have no material effect. He added that Mr. Collins, of Ryan Companies, indicated that the meeting currently scheduled for sometime in early April has tentatively been moved to the first week of June. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - February 25, 2008 9 Councilmember Holmes stated regarding the 10 and 96 concept plan, that based on conversations at the previous worksession and Council meetings, it was her understanding that the Council had to approve the concept plan by the end of February. Mayor Harpstead stated the City has pulled it out of any financial requests; as a result, the City has lost a year of funding and support for this. Councilmember Holmes asked why it was pulled, adding that she thought the City was trying to get it done in time to submit a funding request. Interim City Administrator Willis stated it was the intent of the City and the staff, as well as the representatives at Ryan, that there would be a decision on the concept plan before the end of February. He stated that based on recent Council discussions, staff is planning to come back to the Council at its first worksession in March with the matrix containing the Council's responses from the February 13 worksession meeting along with an outline of how staff suggests moving forward in order to provide direction for the preparation of the concept plan. Councilmember Holmes stated she thought the City Council was already at that point and that the City Council was trying to resolve all issues related to the concept plan in order to get it into the bonding bill, but now it is too late. Interim City Administrator Willis stated he did not believe the City Council had made a decision to proceed with the concept plan. Councilmember Holmes stated it was her understanding that the City Council wanted to have another worksession before the end of the month for that purpose. Interim City Administrator Willis stated that was not his understanding and apologized for the misunderstanding. He stated that staff needs to get together to come up with a process for the City Council's consideration. Councilmember Holmes stated she thought the City Council had determined at its worksession on February 13th that it did not need a drawn concept plan but rather, to come up with a number of ideas; the City Council expressed concern at that meeting that it wanted to get this into the bonding bill. She added there appears to be a disconnect if staff feels the City Council decided it was not worth it to try to get this into the bonding bill, and now it is too late. Councilmember Holden concurred with Councilmember Holmes and added Chris Roy from Mn/DOT indicated to the City Council that he could work off of the City Council's comments. Mayor Harpstead noted that the House and Senate accelerated their process on the bonding bills; the bonding bills were packaged and moved forward last Thursday, which is faster than he thought. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - February 25,2008 10 Councilmember Holmes stated she thought the City Council was working hard to get it in the bonding bill. Councilmember Holden stated the February 13th special worksession meeting minutes reflect that there was consensus to (I) direct staff to prepare a matrix based on the City Council's answers to the questions posed by Mayor Harpstead; (2) direct staff to prepare a resolution for City Council review at a worksession; and (3) request Mn/DOT to prepare a preliminary design document that includes all of the issues raised by the City Council. Councilmember Holmes stated at the January 25th City Council meeting, the Council reviewed the concept plan and felt it was not what it wanted, so a special worksession was called. She added at that meeting, Interim City Administrator Willis pointed out that the City Council has to move quickly on the concept plan because ifit does not move now, the City is going to be two years behind on funding. Councilmember McClung stated even if the City Council had moved forward, it would have been too late anyway. Mayor Harpstead stated he felt that staff is hearing that there is not a consensus of the City Council in order to move it forward. Councilmember Holmes disagreed. Interim City Administrator Willis stated from his perspective, the work that the City Council did at its worksession was productive, but there does not appear to be consensus on the direction the City Council wants to take. Councilmember Holmes stated that Chris Roy from Mn/DOT indicated the City Council could put forth a number of parameters for their consideration in moving from concept to preliminary design, and that the City Council did not have to be that specific to go to the preliminary design stage. Councilmember Holden stated that Steve Bubul was at the February 13th worksession meeting and indicated to the City Council that he would recommend the City Council approve a policy statement as it relates to the project. Councilmember Holmes stated that she previously requested the City Council be given ample opportunity to review any resolution or policy statement before its next worksession in order to move forward with preliminary design. Councilmember Holden asked about next steps, given the City's failure to meet the bonding bill deadline. Interim City Administrator Willis stated that staff is proposing the City Council meet at its next worksession or at a special work session to make a decision regarding preliminary design. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - February 25, 2008 II He stated the City Council needs to make a decision on the transportation issue in order for Ryan to make any progress on its planning. Councilmember McClung stated the City Council also needs to discuss funding for the County Road H interchange, because if the City cannot get funding for that, it wi)] impact the TH-IO/CR- 96 project. Mayor Harpstead stated the City Council wi)] need a couple of work session meetings to discuss TCAAP, the interchanges, the pro forma on the financials overall, and the TH-IO/CR-96 interchange. B. 911 Communications Dispatch Update Public Works Director Hoag stated that he previously provided the City Council with a packet of information along with a copy of a letter addressed to Scott Williams, the radio system manager at the communications center. He reported that Mr. Williams has indicated that he is working with the City of St. Paul, as operators of the CAD system, to compile all of the information requested by the City in order resolve all outstanding issues. Councilmember Holden asked about the timeframe for the study that was conducted. Public Works Director Hoag stated he will obtain further information regarding the timeframe. Mayor Harpstead stated he felt it was important to work toward making sure there are benchmarks in place that are being monitored in order to measure performance against those benchmarks. Councilmember McClung stated he is unable to determine if the information received from Mr. Williams includes average response time and/or response time from the time a call goes into the dispatch center to the time a call is responded to. Mayor Harpstead asked that staff make sure it communicates to Mr. Williams the exact data the City is looking for and to reiterate that the City is looking to make sure performance does not suffer. Councilmember McClung expressed concern with having a consolidated dispatch center under the County with the City of St. Paul operating the CAD system because they own the software and thus, they have to do the analysis. Mayor Harpstead asked if the City Council should design an algorithm for presentation to Mr. Williams. Councilmember Holden replied in the affirmative. Mayor Harpstead requested the Councilmembers email their suggestions to staff. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - February 25, 2008 12 9. COUNCIL COMMENTS AND REOUESTS Councilmember McClung asked when the preliminary development agreement with RRLD lapses. Mayor Harpstead replied it will lapse the end of March. Councilmember McClung asked if the City Council could have a discussion regarding the agreement and how it is going to move toward renegotiating an extension of time. Interim City Administrator Willis stated he will put this item on the agenda. Mayor Harpstead indicated that Finance will need to prepare some preliminary financials for the City Council's review. Interim City Administrator Willis stated that this has been completed. Councilmember Holden stated the Cub store has been robbed on more than one occasion and expressed concern that the latest robbery occurred around 5:30 p.m., which is a very busy time for the store and there are a lot of families in the store at that time. She asked if the City can look into the matter to see if the store is providing adequate security. Mayor Harpstead stated that staff can have a conversation with the Sheriff s Department to see if there is something the City can do to ensure greater safety at the store. Councilmember Holden asked if the City should have a police presence during City Council meetings, particularly given the recent events in St. Louis. Mayor Harpstead stated he would be in favor of it, but there would be an additional cost to the City. He added that the Sherriffs Department is planning to provide this for all of the contract cities, with the option of opting out. Councilmember McClung stated his preference would be to opt out. He indicated he has never felt unsafe at a City Council meeting and does not feel a police presence is necessary at this time. Councilmember Holden concurred and stated if the City Council anticipates a large audience at a particular meeting, the City could ask for police presence at the meeting. Mayor Harpstead stated perhaps the City Council should adopt a policy that staff has the prerogative to take appropriate action to request a Sheriff's deputy if needed. Assistant City Administrator Simon stated that in the past, the City has used law enforcement primarily for traffic control because of the number of people attending a City meeting. ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - February 25, 2008 13 Interim City Administrator Willis stated the Sheriff s office is asking for something in writing from the City. He suggested replying to the Sheriffs office that as a rule, the City does not expect to have a need for a Sheriff at City Council meetings, but in those instances where police presence is required, the City will request it. Councilmember Holmes expressed her appreciation to the Financial Planning and Analysis Committee for their work on the Fund Balance Policy (agenda item 4F). Councilmember Holmes reported that the Ramsey County Library website includes the library's 2008-2018 facilities master plan which she found to be very informative. She stated that she serves as the representative to the library board and indicated the Arden Hills library, in terms of infrastructure, is considered poor or inadequate by an independent rating agency. She stated there was discussion at one time of turning the Mounds View and Arden Hills Libraries into a regional library; however, this was not the recommendation contained in the master plan. She reported that Arden Hills, Mounds View, White Bear Lake, and North St. Paul will remain as portals. She added there is talk of moving the library to another location, but there is nothing definite on this. Mayor Harpstead stated the City Council needs to fmd a time to meet with the city administrator candidates. Assistant City Administrator Simon stated he will contact each of the Councilmembers over the next 24 hours in order to find dates and times to meet with the candidates. Mayor Harpstead stated the County Road H planning money moved forward in the bonding bill and at the last minute, the Committee passed all the projects. He stated this will pay for final design, not necessarily for the intersection. He stated the amount is $6 million, which is not enough to finish the intersection and it still requires a 50% match. ADJOURN MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember McClung seconded a motion to adjourn the meeting. The motion carried unanimously (4-0). gular City Council Meeting at 8:25 p.m. ~r ______ Noah A. Simon Deputy City Clerk CITY OF ARDEN HILLS 'It REQUEST TO APPEAR BEFORE: CITY COUNCIL/ PLANNING COMMISSION AVEN HILLS If you wish to address the City Council or Planning Commission, please follow the suggestions listed below. Thank you. (PLEASE PRINT) Date Name Rem -s ...................-.1-................ ...........Z........................--.............. ------------------- ................ ................--.......... .......... ............. .............. Address .....................................................—....................... .......... -------- ................................... Agenda Item you wish to address ............- ................. ............ ................ ................ ............ Company of Individual Representing (if applicable) tX .......... .................. ............. .............. ..I j Note: Please complete this form so that you may be recognized at the appropriate time on the Agenda.You are under no obligation to speak if you decide against it during the meeting. Please state your full name, address and phone number so the record of your comments will be complete in the minutes of this meeting.Thank you.