The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About4H, Award 2010 PMP Project to WSBEN HILLS . R ' ' e uest for Counc�l Act�on : q Prepared By: Kristine Giga, Civil Engineer Council Meeting Date: October 12, 2009 Award engineering services for the 2010 Pavement Management Program to WSB and _ _ __ _ __ _ __ __--_ _ _ _ _ _ Associates, Inc. _ Resolution 2009-027: Ordering the preparation of feasibility reports for the 2010 Pavement Management Program Budgeted Amount: Estimated Actual Amount: Funding Source: $1,042,500 (engineering and $1,042,500 PIR, Enterprise Funds, construction) Special Assessments �ecommendation: 1. Authorize staff to contract with WSB and Associates, Inc. to provide engineering services for the 2010 Pavement Management Program in an amount not to exceed $84,782.00. 2. Approve Resolution 2009-027: Ordering the preparation of feasibility reports for the 2010 Pavement Management Program. �.�_.__�.�......._� .............._.�..............�....�..�.._._.�....�....... ........._...._..........._._.......�.._�..�..._........_.�.��....................�._.�........._..�_�._._�.��_.................�._...�._..�.._.�.�........-�---.�....�..�._..........�_.....�.._.........___._.............�._................_...� _.... Supporting Documents 1. Memorandum from City Staff dated October 12, 2009 2. Request for Quote scope 3. Proposal submitted by WSB and Associates, Inc. 4. Resolution 2009-027 _ ��i EN HILL S MEMORANDUM DATE: October 12, 2009 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Ron Moorse, City Administrator FROM: Greg Hoag, Public Works Director _ _ __ _ . ____ _ . _ _ _ Krlstine Giga, _Civil �ngineer _ SUBJECT: 2010 Pavement Management Program- Engineering Services and Order Feasibility Report Back�round The City of Arden Hills approved an engineering consultant pool on August 27, 2007 for use on specialized projects or projects that the City of Roseville's Engineering Department may not have the capacity to assist with. The 2010 Pavement Management Program consists of the following streets: Valentine Crest Road, from Valentine Avenue to cul-de-sac, Valentine Avenue, from Lake Valentine Road to Old Highway 10, Valentine Court, from Valentine Avenue to cul de sac, Janet Court, from Lake Valentine Road to cul-de-sac, Katie Lane, from Cleveland Avenue to 1272 feet south, Katie Court, from Katie Lane to cul-de-sac, A scope of work was prepared for completing the data collection (topographic survey), feasibility report/preliminary design, �'inal design, and construction services. City staff reviewed proposals submitted by the firms in its municipal engineering pool, and is recommending WSB & Associates, Inc. for this work. Discussion Proposals were submitted by all four firms in the municipal engineering pool: Bolton & Menk, Inc., Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., MFRA, and WSB & Associates, Inc. This contract will be a not to exceed cost based on actual hours spent on the proj ect. The proposal amounts are listed below: City Council Meeting C:�Documents and Settings\becky.brazys\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK15F\10-12- 09Memo_2010PMP_FeasRep. doc Page 1 of 2 Consultant Proposed Fees WSB & Associates, Inc. $ 84,742 Bolton & Menk, Inc. $129,483 MFR.A, Inc. $150,100 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. $193,010 Staff recommends WSB & Associates, Inc. for this work. WSB & Associates, Inc. staff is experienced in municipal street reconstruction proj ects, including underground utility design, rain gardens and other storm water best management practices. WSB & Associates, Inc. staff has worked on other proj ects that fall within the Rice Creek Watershed District's jurisdiction, and is familiar with their rules and requirements on street reconstruction proj ects. WSB & Associates, Inc. has also recently been working with the City on the Valentine Drainage Study; City staff has had a positive experience with this �rm and feels the proposal that has been submitted best meets the intent of the proj ect and the City's needs. A resolution ordering the preparation of the feasibility report is attached. A portion of the 2010 PMP is proposed to be assessed. The approval of the attached resolution is required for the Minnesota Chapter 429 Assessment Process. Financial Implications Engineering services will be paid for from the PIR Fund; these fees are incorporated into the total proj ect cost that is assessed back to property owners. The breakdown of proj ect fees is attached in the proposal submitted by WSB & Associates, Inc. The consultant is aware that fees pertaining to final design and construction services are contingent upon the City Council ordering final plans following the public hearing. The cost to complete the feasibility report is within the budgeted amount for 2009. If authorized, final design would begin in January, 2010, and would be a part of the 2010 budget. Council Action Requested Motion to authorize staff to contract with WSB & Associates, Inc to provide engineering services for the 2010 Pavement Management Program in an amount not to exceed $84,782. Motion to approve Resolution 2009-027: Resolution ordering the feasibility report for the 2010 Pavement Management Program. City Council Meeting C:�Documents and Settings\becky.brazys\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK15F\10-12- 09Memo_2010PMP_FeasRep. doc Page 2 of 2 :;:��,�>:::: � :� `. Request for Quote: 2010 Pave�nent Mana�ement Pro�ram (PMP) The C��y of Arden Hills �s seeking quotes for a topographic survey, feasibility report, preli�ninaryff��na� �iesign, contract adrr�inistrat�o�, and construction adm�n�stra�ion, inspection ancl stakin� for ti�e �010 PMP. GENERAL PRaJECi SCOPE The City's Cap�ta� Ir�prowement Plan identifies a eombination s�reet reconstruction/mi�1 and overIay project for the 2a�Q Pavement Management Program. Tl�e resident�al streets slated for reconstruction are �ocated near Valentine Lake and o�f of Cleveland Avenue, and include the streets Iisted below. The total length of the projeet is approximately 0.93 �niles. The 200$ Pavement Conditlon Indices (PCI) fo� these s�reets range f�om 34 to 82; pro3ected 2010 PCI are �istec� ir� parentheses. A project �ocation map �s at�aehed. Street name Valentine Avenue Va�entine Caurt �a�entine Crest Road Janet Court Katie Lane Katie Court Lim�ts Lake Valentine Rd to Sneliin� Ave N(Qld Hwy l 0} Valentine Avenue to cul-de-sac Valentine Avenue to cul-de-sac Lake Valentine Road to cul-de-sac Cleveland Avenue to Katie Lane Phase � � Katre Lane to cul-de-sac PCI rati n 36 (13} 34 (22) 53 (33} 72 (65} 82 (76) sa E4o> The seIected cansultant shalI corriplete the topograph�e field survey, feasibiIity report, preli�inary assessment ro11, pre��minaryl final design, stormwater management p1an, constr�ctian doeuments, permitti�g, contract administration, final assessrnent roll, construction staking, construction observation, construetion administration and as-buiit survey services for the projec�. REQUIRED SERVICES DESCRIPTION I. �a�a Collection (Topo�raphic Survev) The City will h�re a separate consultant for the so�� an�lysis for the project area. The final repart will be distr�bu�ed, once �t is completed. The Consultant should compiete the projeet survey for all streets listed above. 1. CONTROL POINTS Set up control points an the pro3ect. Contro� points shauld be placed beyond expected eonstruction Iimits so that they can be utilized during construction. Enough control pornts shouId be placed on the project so �hat ii certaln controi points are vandalized or atherwise lost, the control can easily be re-estab�ished. Control points shoulc� be set up using R�r�sey County coordinates. City and County benchmarks should be utilized for vertical con�rol. A copy of �he benehmark infarmatior� is available in the Public Works Depar�ment. 2. UTIL�TY LOCAT�ON Call Gopher State to assemble utility information which will be shown on the plans. 3. CRQSS-SECTIDN DATA Provide crass-section point data a� Sa foot stations, al� driveway Iocations an� where the topagraphy changes between 50 foot stations. At a minimum the cross section data should extend 10 feet beyond the right of vvay. As necessary due to the topography changes beyond the right of way, �dditiona] shots may be necessary. At driveway Iocat�ons the cross sectional da�a should ex�end to �he garage ar driveway terrn�n�. Includec� in the cross sectiona� c�ata shauld be ex�sting street centerline? roadway edg�s (tap and bottom bituminous eurb shots}, top and bottom of retaining walls and every change in grade of the cross section. Enough shots must be taken to provide an accurate and complete TIN. 4. TOPaGRAPI-�IC F�AT�JRES Provic�e shot data �or al� topographic features including but not limited to trees, treeltne� mailboxes, driveway edges, landscape ecIges, private �nd public utility �ocations, house corr�ers adj�cent to street reconstruc�ion, roadway edges, street signs, praperty carners, �ight pales, flag pales, anc� retain�ng walls. Locate and p�-ovide shot data for all property corners adjacent to th� street canstruction. Provide g�tter shot da�a far the cuI de sacs. 5. BASE MAP�'ING Utilizing CAD software that is compatible with the latest versior� af AutoCAD, create the base map for �he projeet. The base map s�ou�d be created to show a}I topographic features fram the �e�d data. Create a TIN model for the project area and create an AutoCAD layer for contaurs. The Cansult�nt may use their standard linetypes and symbols. Upon comp�etion of the project, electron�c fi�es sha11 be prQvided to the City, along with plot fIes or other support�ng data. II. Feasibility Report/Preliminat-y Desi�n The Consultant shall provide prelir�nary engineering services for the proposed project, inc�uding �ield rev�ews of the projec� site as necessary and pr�paration af presentatton graphies and ex�ibits for public info�mation �neetings. T�he Co�su�tant sha�l pre�are a feasibility repor� cor�taining the project description, background information, engineer's estimate, recommendations, approximate timeline, and the Min�esota 429 process �or assessments. The repart should provtde the a�proxima�e �roject eost and the estimated assessments. It is expeEted that p�ans for the project are at 30% development with the completion of the feasil�ility report. A preliminary storm water design should also be included in t�e report. Following the presentation to City Council and subsequent public hearing, the City Cauncil may deeide not to move forward with the pro�ect. If that is the case, cansultant work pertaining to final des�gn and constructior� ser�ices would not be needed. III. Final Desi�n If �he �roject is ordered for construct�on by the City �ouncli, the Consultant wiI] prepare fina� plans ar�d speci�cations. Arden Hi�1s City staff v�ill prav�de utiI�ty information as needed fo�- the project. Final plans and specifications will be prepa�-ed to City standards. Plans should include: • Tit�e Sheet • Quantity Sheet � Details • Storm Sewer Sheets • Sanitar}� Sewer � Watermain Sheets • Plan / Profiie Sheets • Cross Section Sheets (cross sections every 50 feet and at driveways and intersections) 60%-completed, 90%-completed and final plans and speci�cations v�ill be submitted ta City staff for review and comment. Consultant sha11 also work with private utilities to coordinate any work that they �c�entify in the project area. � Storm water management The pro�ec� will need to meet �he requirements of the Rice Creek Watershed District. This may �nclude rain ga�dens or ather infi�trat�on Best 1Vlanageme�t Prac�ices (BMP} on the project. The Consultant will iden�i�y suitab�e �oeations for BMPs. The existing drainage system includes vWet�ands. Wetlands sh�il be de�ineated as part of the data collection/topog�-aphic survey. If it is determined that rain garden BIVIPs wiil be used to meet permit requirements, t�e City will seek res�dents to volunteer far the BMPs thro�gh the neighborhood meeting process. T'he Consultant sha1l work with wil��ng residents on final design and p�ant layaut. It is anticipatec� that two rneetings per resident will occur to discuss and finalize inc�ividUaI planting plans. The Consultant sha�l eoordinate abtaini�g maintenance agreements with the residents during the plannrng process (agreement to be provided by the City.} �or estimat�ng purposes, assume 10 rain garden locations. Permittin� �omplete permitting for the project. �'ermits �vhich may be required �nclude: 1. Rice Creek Watershec� Dist�ict 2. Min�esota Pollution Contral Agency �NPDES and SWPPP} 3. Department of Naturai Resources 4. Minnesota Department of Health 5. Ramsey County 6. Minnesota Department of Transportation Easefnents The Consultant wi11 identify and acqu�re any needed easeme�ts. Every effort �vill be made to have easern�nt issues resolved prior to the award af the construction contract. Acqu�sition effor�s inc�ude meet�ng w�th property owners, addressing their concerns, preparation of legal descri��ons, exhibits, and easemen� documents. Assessr�ents The Consu�tant shall prepare the preliminary and �nai assessmen� ro�Is consistent with the City Assessment Palicy. Biddin� Phase The Cansultant will pravide bidd�ng phase ser�ices, includ�ng advertisements for b�ds, bidding do�ume��s, address contractor questions, issue addencla, and assist in conduet�ng the bid opening. The Consultant will check �he bids, pro��de detailed bid tabulation, and provide a recommendation of award to the City Counci�. I V. Construet�'on Services Pro�ect Canstruction 4bsey-vatiol� The Consultant will provide construc�ion observatian services. The Constructian Obse�-ver should be avaiI�ble 4Q-50 hours per week on the projec� during construction activity. For estimating purposes, use 1 C� weeks of construction at 45 hours per week. The Construction Qbserver w��I track project quant�ties. The Construction Observer must also complete daily re�orts and subrnit them to the City at the end of each week. The Construction Observer must perform erosion control �nspectlon and implement the storm water pollution preve�tion plan for the project. The Construction Observer must be readily available to answer questions ane� help facilitate communication to residents in the canstruction zone. Construction testing will be coordinated by the Eonsu�tant, but will be provided by others and will be bilIed directIy to Arden Hills by �he firm performing the work. Projec'� CO7ZS�YI�C�1(}jZ SI�QICtI22� The Consultant �nt�st provide construction staking for the projeet including: �. Pravide line and grade stakes as required for a1� utiIity improvements. 2. Provide "cut sheets" for alI utility improvements. 3. Pravide line and grade stakes as �equired far a1l street �mpravements ineIuding curb stakes, sidewalks. trails, etc. 4. Provide "cut sheets" for a11 street improverr�ents. 5. Provide informatior� for recorcl drawings, �ncluding �ut not Iimited to top nut of hydrants, manhole �ims, and manhole inverts. Pra�ect Construc�tion Ad�nir�istYation The Consultant must prov�de construction adnr�inistration for the project. Co�s�uction adrninistration should inelude: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Respond to des��n questions from City or residents. Prepare the payment est�mate �ased on the Cons�ruction �bserver's log. Tracking field notes, testing, and other items on the projec�. Praject fi�ing and genera� administration Coordinate weekly pro�ect meetings Prepare newsletters (approximately monthly) Prov�de projeet scheduling �nformat�on for weekly website updates As-built documet��ation The Consultant wi�I ereate ti�e as-built record drav�ings based on the informatiorr col�ected by the construction stakin� erev�. Work Completed to Date Base dravWings have been �enera�ed in AutoCAD 2007, and prelimir�ary street design has been comp�eted for Katie Court and Kat�e �,ane. These street segments vvere origi�ally Included in the 20Q7 PMP, however, due to a pending develap�nent, was postponeci until after the devela�ment was constructed. This digital information �v1ll be provlc�ed to the Consultant for t�se in completing the feasibility report and prepar�ng fin�l plans. Pro�ect Schedule The follov�ing is the proposed sehedule for the project. Consultant Proposajs Due at City of Arden �It�ls City Council Awards Contract Data Callection/Topo�raphic Survey Neighborhood 1Vleeting #1 (klckof� Pre��minary Engineering/Feasibility Report Preparation Neighborhood Meeting #2 (feasibility report) �ity Counci� Accepts Feasibility Report & Orders Pub��c Hear�ng Pub�ic Hearing�C�ty Counci� Autl�orizes Preparation of Plans and Specs Fina1 Design 60°Io Plan Review Open House Neighborhood Meeting 94% Plan Rev�ew Bid Openin� September 25, 2009 Qctober 12, 2409 Oetober 2009 October 29, 20�9 � October - No�ember 2009 Decerriber �, 2009� December 14, 20Q9 �anuary I 1, 2414 January- February 20I0 Week of F�bruary 8, 2010 �ebruary 18 2010� Week of Mareh 1, 2410 Apr�12009 � .� Assessment Hearing Begin Con�tri.�ct�on Complete Construction *suggested dates M ay 20 � 0 �Vlay-June 201 � October 20I0 PROJECT MEETINGS The �onsultant s�auld anticipate a kick-off ineeting with City staff, followed by monthly pro�ect update meetings through final design. The Project �ngineer should p�an on rr��et�ng with the ��y priar to �ach of the pub�ic information meetings to go over the farmat and requirements of these meetings. �'he Project Eng�nee�- ar�d eanstruction Obse�ver should alsa attend the pre-construct�on meeting. During construction the Praject Engineer and Construction 4bserver shou�d eoordinate and attend weekly meetings w�th the Contractor and C�ty. P�JBLIC MEETIl�IGS Three p�b�ic informatian rneetings wi�I be held w�th �roperty owners loc�ted within the project area. These meetings wili be an opportunity for the owners to gain an understanding of the scope of the praject, and comment on the design at the preliminary and f�nal stages. `�'he public inform�tion meetings wil� be held in the evenings. Three City Council meetings should also be ineiuded in the scope (Presen� Feasib�Iity Report, Publ�c Improvement Hearing, Assessment Hearing). A rate shall be included for addi�ianal Caunci� meettngs, if needed. CITY RESPONSIB�LITIES The City �i�� perfarm the fo�Iowing functions on �his project: 1. Prov�de A�toCAD files with preliminary design to date for Katie �..ane and Katie Court. 2. Provide a sample Feasibility Report previously com��eted by the City af Arden Hills 3. Provide samp�e plans previous�y completed by the City of Arden H��s 4. Provide soi� boring and pavement sectian recom�nendation 5. Su�r�it eompleted permit applicatio�s along wi�h correspor�ding fees 6. P�ovide existing as-built information PROPOSAI. CONTENTS The proposals shou�d include a project scape, prajec� understanding, schedule, proposed desig� team, a cost breakdown including hours budgeted ta each task and hourly rates. If resumes of staff o� the �roposed design tearn were not submitted v�ith the Statement af Qual�f�cations, June 2007, p�ease provide with the proposal. Piease include sub-total hours and costs for eac� of the major tasks: Feasibi�ity Report, Des��nBid and Construction. The Cansultant shall provide a not-tQ-exceed totaI cost �or the proposed project services. Please provide three copies of the proposai ln let��r forma� (not bound or Iaminated} by noon, Friday, Septerr�ber 25, 2008. In an effort to save paper, please make double-sided capies and be concise with your response. Address submittals to: Kri sti ne �i ga, P.E. Civ�l En�ineer City of Arden Hills 1245 West �ighway 96 Arden Hills, MN SS I 12 The City reserves the right to reject any or a�} proposals at the full discretion of the City. �� Infrastructure I Engineering 1 Planning I Construction 7Ui Xenia Avenue South � Assncaates, Inc. Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 5541fi Tel: 753-54i-4800 �ax: 763-541-1700 September 2�, 2009 Ms. Kris�ine Giga, PE City Engineer City of Arden Hil�s 1245 V�est Highwa� 96 Arden �-Iills, MN SS� 12 �e: Proposal to Provide Engineering Services for the City of Arden �iills 2010 Pavement Management Program Dear Ms. Giga: WSB & Associates, Inc. is pleased to respond to the City of Arden H�l�s' Request for Quotes rega�ding the 2010 Pavement Managerr�ent Program. We are providing a qualified team with specific experience imp�einenring street reconstruction projects. In addition, the WSB team has knoWledge of the Valentine Lake watershed, having co�npleted the Drainage Analysis for �Talentine Park. �IVSB recognizes we are not only work.ing for the �ity, but also for your �esidents. Our goal is to minimize the impacts to City in a cost effective manner. We have enclosed three copies of our proposal for your consideration. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or conc�rns regarding this proposal. We can be reached at 7�3.541.4800. We look forward to wo�king w�th you �n the near future. Sincereiy, �1TSB & Associates, Inc. ` Diane Har�kee, PE Project Manager ennedy, P rincipal Minneapo�is 1 St. Cloud Equal O�portunity Employer s ;� ♦ � �� ar�. �,� Proposal to Provide �ngineering Services for the 2010 Pave�ent Management Progra� Arden Hills 2010 f'avement Management Progr-am September 2�, 20�9 Page 1 of b s � �`�� The City is seeking consulting servic�s fo� their 2010 Pavement Nianagement Prograrr�, located near Valentine i�ake and adjacent to Cleve�and Avenue. The project will generally include the reconstruction or mill and overlay of roadways and storrn water n�anagernent. The project is to be designed in the winter of 2009/2010 and constructed in 2010. The requested services include the �ollowing: • Data collection and topographic survey • �easibility report • Prelin�inary/�inal assessment roll • Preliminary/final design • Storm water management plan • Easerr�ents • Permitting • Construction documents • Contract administration • Construction services • As-built survey �1"€:��C� �C�� The project includes t�.e reconstruction of Valentine Avenue, �1ale�tine Court, and �alen�ine Crest Road. It also includes a mi�l and overlay project for Janet Court, Katie Lane, and Katie Court. The City will provide the topographic data and AutoCAD file for Katie Lane and Katie Court. We have re�rievved the site and discussed the project with �ity staff, and have identified the ft�lloWing key aspects: Storm Water Mana,gement — The design of the �torm water system for this project wil� meet Mn/DOT standards, including State Aid Design requirements for Valentine Avenue ar�d City standards for the ren�aining roadways. The design will also meet Rice Greek Watershed District (RCVITD� rules for permitting. WSB specializes in implementing storn� water management practices into neighborhood reconstruction }�rojects, vvhile minimizing/eliminating impacts to adjacent private property. In addition, WSB has project sp�ci�ic experience working in the Valentine Lake waters�ed, �aving completed the drainage analysis for �alentine Park. R�adways — The �avement condition indices for tl�e roadways i�dicate tizat the appropriate pavement �nanagement rnethod has beer� considered. It anticipated that the design will need to i�clude v�ridening �alentine Ave�ue to meet state aid standards. WSB's goal will be to design �l�e roadwa�s and drainage within the existing right of way. +� a ! � �se .�� .�� t.,� 2010 �'avement 11�lanagen�ent �ragram Septemt�er 2�, 2009 Pc�ge 2 of 6 �iTeighl�orhood �`er�.sitive Design — Res�dents are �rpically �re�-y con�erned abou� the �n�pact to their neighbor�ood and t�ei� property when th� City proposes a reconstr�ction project. iIITSB wil� provide a design that �s tec�nica�ly e�ficient and encompasses r�e�ghbo�-hood concerns. WSB will facil�tate goo�l commu�.icat�on betw�en the City and �he neighborh��d, v��ich �nrill i�crease understa�.dir�g and n�axirnize ne�g��orhood cor�sensus. �roject Coordination — The pro��ct area has existir�g rn�nicipal utilities and �rivate util�t�es. They wi�l both be part of the �.esign considerations to make sure �he �ro�ect sta�s o� schedu�e t�rough construction. Based on these guidi�g principles, we vvill cornp�ete the scope of ser�rices as req�ested in �he Request for ��otes tR�Q�. The �ollow�ng ir�cit�des a sumn�ary of the deliv�rables a�d key issues �e�ated to each phase of the project: 1. Data Co�lection �'Topo�aphic Surve�) �eliverab�es • Control poin�s on �amsey �ounty coor�iinate sys�em • Gopher C3ne �iesign locate and pro�ect p�an coordination • �xisting and proposed cross secti�n data o� project p�ans • Topogra��ic fe�tures an ba�� nap • Base �ap in A�toCAD with TII� model 2. ��aSi�l�l� �.£�?02'� Deliverables • Final feasi�ility report, including a projec� descrip�ion, background information, cost opinion, reeo��nenda�ions, projec� schedule, and prelim�nar� assessmenr roll to meet Mn Statute 429 �rocess �eq�iremen�s � Preliminary roadway design based on �he soi� borings provided a�d City and sta�e aid standards • Preli�ninary stvrm wa�e�r rr�anage�ent design, w�ic� �nay ir�clude rain gardens, i��ii�ratior� basins, �e�hanical syste�ns, o�- ot�er merhods depe�ding upon conditions v��thin the proj�ct a�ea • Presentat�on gra��ics and ex�ibits for use at pub�ic i�formation mee�ings Key Iss�es + �reli�ni�.ary �r�vate u�ility coordi�atior� • �oord��ation �v�th ��e R.C�IITD and residents regarding storm water mar�agement ar�d per�nitti�g •�dent�fy preiiminary easement needs, if a�plicable. 4ur goal is to cornpiete t�e project v�rithin the e�st��g �ight of way a�d easements. • I�er��fy ut�lit� re�a�r needs a�.d private sewer serv�ce issues based o� televising, �eak de�ectio�., and public wor�.s re�o�ds �rovided by the �ity * Finalize �ro�osed street w�dths within the p�oject area • Pubiic input �egarding the pro�ect s � � - �s� i� � ��ar�. t,� 2010 Pavement Mant�ge;neyzt Progrc�m September 25, 2009 Page 3 of 6 Attenda�ce at rr�.eetin�s w�.ich shall include: • Project kick-off m�eting to discuss project s�ope, schedule, and deliverables � Attendance at up to two public information meetings �rior to the public hearing � Attendance at the public hearing to present information and/or answer questions 3. Final Desi�n Deliverables • Final plans in accordance with State Aid and City standards, including: — Title shee� — Estimated quantities — Co�struction details — Typical sections — Storm sewer/street p�an ar�d profiles — Storm water management/water quaiity improvements — Sanitary sewer/water�nain — Erosion control/SWPPP — Cross-sections (every 50 feet and at driveways) • Project specifications, contract documents, and bidding doc�ments � Permit applications/submittals provided to the City, including but not �imited to the following: — RCVITD �permit) —�Vlinnesota Pollution Control Agenc� (I��DES and SWPPP) — Department of Natural Resources — Min�esota Department of Health — State Aid Plans will be submitted to the �innesota Department of Transportation — Ramsey County Transportation • Easement identi�.cation: — V1Te �vill work to complete the improvements within the existing rig�t of �vay and easements; however, we will identify ease�nent requirements as needed • 4pin�on of probable cost • Advertisement for bids, bid docum�nt distribution, contractor coordination, bid tabulation, and contract award recommendation • Final assessment roll Ke�sues • Continued private utility coordination � Storm water management design and neighbor�hood coordination • Design improvements to fit within the right of way • Reviev� construction plans with the Cit� � ��5� � aS.�� t.� 4. Cons�ruc�ion 5ervices . , � 2010 Pavement Management Prograrri Septe�ber 25, 2009 Page 4 af b �elive�a�les • Canstruc�ion observation fo� 40-50 hours per �vee� during construction activity. �I1Te have assumed a totai o� 1£ vveeks �f construction activity at 45 hours per vveek as part of flur fee, as speci�i�al�y requ�sted in t�e RFQ. � Daily reports, sub�nitted vvee�y t� the City • Erosion control/S�iTPP� i�s�ect�on and mor�i�oring •�egular cornn�ur�icatior� vv�th resider�ts to p�ovide infor�nation and answer �uestions • Coorc�ination of materiais t�sti�g �testing firn� to contracr directly wi�h the City) • Co�structio� staking ar�d sur�reying, including: — L�ne and grade stakes for �tility irr��rovements, i�cluding �ut sheets — Line and grade stakes for roadway cons�ruct�on, including cur�i s�a�es — Informatio� �or record drawings, including top �ot of all hydrants, manhole rir�s, a�d rnanhole inverts � �or�struction ad�ninistration, including: — Respond to t�es�gr� q�est�fl�s �-orn Ci� staff or resid�nts —�repare and subr�it pa� estimates to ��e City — Track�ng field r�otes and ��er documenta�ion — �roject fil�ng a�t� general a�mi�istration — Coo�dir�ate v�ee�ly construction rrieetings and prepare meet�ng m�r�utes — Ass�stance wit� �ity neinrsl�tter and ot�er resident cor��unication • As-�u��t recfl�-c� drav��ngs ��y �ssr�es � Continued private utilit� coord�na�ion � One-�n-or�e meeti�gs wi�h residents to i��ien�ent rain garder� plant�ng •�ornm�nicarion w�� resider�ts to resolve cfl�str�ction issues as needed Atrendar�ce �� rneet�ngs �hich s�all include - • �re-consrr�ct�ior� co�fere�ce + Weekly constructio� mee�ings to dis�uss �ro�ect issues and schedule � � s, ' � i�l�se &�a�� We propose to complete the �roject schedule as outlined in the �.FQ: 2010 Pavement Manage�ent Progra�rt September 25, 2009 Pc�ge S of �f K�ick-off ineeting ............................................................................................. 4ctober 19 or 2a, 2009 Data collection/topograp�ic survey .............................................................. .................October 2009 Neig�borhood meeting # 1......... ..............................................................................October 29, 2009 P�eliminar� engineeringjfeasibility report preparation .............................October — lvovember 2�09 . Neig orhood Meeting #2 {fe�sibility report) ....................................................... Decem�er 3, 2009 �ity accepts feasibility report/orders �ublic hearing ............................................ December 14, 2009 Public �earing/City authorizes plans and specs .......................................................January 1 l, 2010 Final design ........................................... .......................................................January — February 2010 b0% plan review ....................................................................................................... February 8, 2010 Open house neighborhood meet�ng ....................................................................... February 18, 2�10 90°/n plan review .................................................................................... .... Week of March l, 20�� Bidopening .........................................................................................................................A�ril 2010 �ssessrnent hearing .......................................................................................................e......May 2010 � May — June 2010 Begin construct�on .................................................................................................... � ......4ctober 201� Comp ete construcnon ............................................................................................. . �� .� Our pr�posed project team has extensive experience w�t� neighborhood reconstruction projects as outlined in our General Services Proposal. The following is a listing of the proposed pro3ect team, including their �pecific role: Diane Hankee, PE, Project Manager • Primary contact for City staff and residents • �ubli�c and neighborhood meetings • Feasibility report, design, and construction management � Speci�.catio�./contract document preparation Jay Kennedy, PE, Principal • Quality control and assurance • Secandary contact for City staff and residents Matt John, EIT, Project Engineer — Please refer to Mr. John's enclosed resume. • Private utility coordina�on � Cost estin�.ating • Pre�iminary and �ir�al roadway and utility design ♦ �SB a�■� � ,� tA� Tim Cartony, E�gin�ering �'ech�ician • Project grap�ics � P�oject plar� preparation `T�dd Hubmer, �E, �ssociate • S�or� water m.a�agen�er�t design a�d perrnitting • Rain garden�in�ilt�a�i�n des�gn �Ilike �/Ialszycki, Construction Ser�i�es • Construct�o� obse�-vat�on and adm�nistrat�on �teve Ische, PLS, Surve�ring • Cons��ctiflr� sta�ng Sonya �Ien�ing, PE, A�s�ciate • Ease�nent acq�isition ��e�.� �e� 2010 �aven�en� I�Qnagen�ent Prograr�c Septeml�er 25, 2009 Page b of 6 The fol�owi�g �a��e s�mmarizes the major c�st corn�onen�:s for the �ro�ject based on the scope of ser�ces ou�lined i� the RFQ. �'he �roject cfls�s �isted on the attached table are based on 2009 ave�age ho�rly rates, �ncluding ov��head a�d �xed �ees. �'ask 1 2 3 4 �'otal Descrin�i `�'opographic survey Feasibilit� report �ina� design Co�structior� services Total Cost $ 2, 778 $3,9b1 $23,121 $54,882 $84, 742 Ke� Assu�.��ions • Ct�nstructio� observation a� 45 l�o�rs per �eek �or l� v�eeks •�air� garden design/�onstruction as a�referred alternative •�ase�ent a�quisition costs are �nc�uded for �ne propert�r. If eminenfi domain is neces�ary to a�quire a� ease�nent, v�re can pro�de assistance as an addi�ional s��-vice. e .Reirnbursa�le F�er�ses • �e rn�i � �ees • �id/ad�rertising fees �► F�roposal for Engineering Ser�vi�es for the 201 n Pa�rernent Management Program �� w�, -� �� L�,� 1� A�AI/4'I(IIl'X� fl(�'. �. .. Esdmated Hours � I ; � � Project Project Engineering � 2-Person ' Construction � Total Princi al Associate ; Mana er �n . Tech Surve Crew � Observer � Clerical Hours Cost � � ; -----� ..�_ T°PoBraPhic Survey.___..__.---�-- .. _.__.___..___._.__..----�----___._.....-�----�----�----- ----�--------- _._-----___ ____.__ .._.__�__-�-----.____ __._�----..-------------_____.._._._' _._.._._ _ _ i - - _._.....- -- - -- ---- -- _.�__.----...-------------�------.__.._.... _..--- --.. --- .. -------...._...._ __ __ _.,._._... _ .. r - � - --- �----- -------�-------=--�--------_..--------�----- -- ___..._...__- --�-----------_. __ _-------�---�-�------ A. Control Points � � 2 � 1 ' � � � 3 $ 406.00 -�----______--�------��---� ::-------- ;--.___.____._..--�--------- � , __...._.....__..._._----..-------------------- -----._._._ __.._._..__.. _. ___ ____..-----------�--.: __._..--_..._._.__-- --___...----_.,---------�--�-------- _ _..___...------�--------..----__.-�-�--- ------�-------------_._.__ _.__ _.______..----._..__._.._._.__._...- ---..._....__......._...____--��---- B. Ut111 LoCltioris � ' � 1 1 � t .r---._..._..._.--.----------._ ._..-------. __.______.--...--_--�-.----__...--- ____.-_..-�-�--___._ �--_______.--___��--------------�---------�---------.....__...------._,.._._�--�-�-----------------._.._..- ---- _---._._._.. ..._..__...-F--. _-------___.--------___._._...;__.....----_�_._--�------�-----�---__. _..----_...__---------------- ...____....._..__-----------------....__._..--�---•-----------------�----.:.-----------�-�------- � 2 $ 181.00 --____..__C....___Cross-Section �ata _—____ � ; � ..._.__--�--fi----�-----....__.....------- ------._...- ---------- __.__---.._---------- __..._._ , ___.__ ._ __ __.----�---- --------------------- .._ . _ ._..._ .... . ......_-- -�-- - -- -- - ---._.; _. .._ _ _ __._ __ .. _ __ -- -- ---- --- --- - --_.._..._ _. ... .__...---- ---�--- ...__ _ _ -_ _._ __ _.-- - --- --- -- -- ---._.. ...._. _.___ . �...----------- --�-�----.....---�----��-- ---- --.. ---- -�-�--�-----._ � ._._..._.._ .�-�----- --- ---- �--- 8__ ---- -� ---..- -- . _ 1,120.00 --- - - --. __D. ..__..T��$raPluc Feat�ures__.____...-----�--- ----�---___ __ _ �... _ .. . _ _ F � t 6 ; -t- _ .. .----�-----__..---- -- - � � _... ...----. _--.-.---._ ... __..._._. ..__ ..__._._ _.__.._.___...___..__ 6 $ 840.00 _ _. ._.._ _ ..-� - - - - ._. --- --------�--.__._.. ...----...--- ----- --_ _ ___ -- --.. _._.._._.. .--- -- -�----�---- -- __........._._.___._ �----------_... �--- ____._._.------ ---- -�---�-----.._. . _ . . .. +- -- -----�----�-----....__...__.__._.t...------ -�----._......_.�._ _..__...__ ___ -__ __ . _--�-�-----�----�-----____.._..._ ----- �.._.---_.-�---�� -----Base MaPL��_`__--._.__-------...----- --------- -----------------�--------.._... - ... _._....... - ---- ----�--- - ----� - - ------� .---- ---_.. --- 1- _ .._ -- ...---�------------------------- -- . .__ ._...._. ---...---- - 1 ' ' i 2 $ 231.00 � -------_.______...._.._.._----------..._._.._.._._._.._.�----------.___......__.....__.----�--�----------__._..__..----------;-----�----�-------...----------- _ .-------- ------._._.____......._..--------�------ Subtotal � 2 ! 1 2 ' 16 � i 21 $ 2, 778.00 . , 2 Feasibility R,eport/Preliminary Design � � ; � __._.-.-----_._�_____.___._.__�,__._�_.__.____._.._._�__�...._.__....._______-------___.--------_..�._____....___.__.__...__..._._.._..__. _._._.___...___------._._.._..;--._._______.._...__.______.__..____.---..---------...____..._. __.._�..__----____.__._.._.._.__ _.__._--.---.----.__....._....._. _...--------____..___._..------- -----___. _. . _. _.. _,_. _ .. ...__..,._..-- ------- _._ .._.___�.... __ _. ---- -- - - --- -- . . ___ __....--- ----� ---____... _ ....____ --- - .._.__ ._._. _ _�._� .--I�ro,�eCt Mana�ement,_Coord�natton and Meetin�s--------- ---- ----- ------- _ . _.--.--.._ _._2__._ _ _._,. _�.. ---- --- ___. _...- - - ' 4 � 2 ; t 2 10 $ 95U.00 . . B. Prelimin Desi �and Schedule , - -- __.. _.._.� __- ---...--- .8..---- --- . .. . .i--. .. _.- --- -.. _. _4._._...___ ___ _ �_ . _ . _...... �_ ____ __ _. ._.__ .. .._.... -- - -- -- ---- - __ -- -- -� - - �- -� -- --- -----._ .---. .. _. �---- --- . __._ ---- - --_.__.. --� ---- .__._ ..- --._ ..__... -- -_. . _ _._ _. _ _�_ _--- _._._.____...----.----- --- �Y_.__� _—.__.._---_---_..___..______..._.__..._...._._..___._.`__.....__�...__...___.__ ; � 2 19 $ 1 807.00 ------....----------..._._.__....._r._._...----....�__....._..--- ------- . - - �------._.-___...�---.�.__. _._.�_._.__..- -- ---•--...r.--- --_ ____._--------�_..�_. _-- ---- --�-....___ __ -- �---- --.____...� _...._-�----_..---. _.._.._----- --- ----. __ �._...__...______.._...__ �.__._..__... --- C. Cost Fstimate/Finanrin 2 � 3 r.. __ _�_ _.._._---..__._.____._ i , �_ _--- _�.�__________.._._�._ __._______..�_.____.� _._ �._______.__._._._.__.___._.._._.-----------____._.._......______._ _.._. -.-._--- -._._ .. ._. __ . ___ __. _ __._ __� _.__ _ __ _ _..__...__._... __.. ___._.�_.___.___..._ _.__.___ ._--.-.-� -_-.----________.--.--.---.-----.__.___.�------.-._-.-----..-.-.--.---�--_.__----_._.---___._ �.____--..-----.----.____._�_._._.___� __..__.___..____.�_.--.....-- - 5 ---- $ 452.00 _ .. . _ .. . rt�._._____._._----.�._.__ ..� D. Assessment Roll � � 4 r 4 � ' i 8 $ �52.00 ------ ._. __ _. _._...___ _ ._-- ___._ __ ---- ._...-- ------ ---- --__�__._.._._ _._._._....--------.._.. .._... _------- ---- ---- --- ---------. _....- ---_._ __.. ._. _...__ ___.. .__...__. . .... . __ _..__.. -------- --... _- --.. ... ..- -�-- ---- -- ---- --------.___ _... ...._. _.__ ...----.� __ _ ------...... ._....__.. ---- __ _--� --- - --_ ___ ._ ..__. --------- -----.__._.._._.__�__.�._. ---- -----. ._ - --- -.__._ ____.._._____.__.- --_..__.... ----.----. - _ .._____. _._ _ _._.---- __..____._.._.------.- Subtotal 2 ; { 18 13 5 i � 4 42 $ 3 961.00 - � ---3- - -----Fi�tial l�es� --�----------�--- ' ' i ; -. _._��_._._»_.___.__.----•--.-__---�---••----____.-�----------�-------_�.__ ------ -------•--_.....- ---�-r---....�..------------._�..__...._ '_____..._.._.--�---�------•--------•-- --------.._._.._.--------------•---- ------_.___..__._.___._._�._---.__ ___.._.__..._......._._---------_..___.'-�---•--�---�--------...__......._.__�......---•-------- ----...__.•----- ---�-----... . .__._. __.__--- A.__.__Pro,�ectManz�ement, Coordination_andMe�tin�s--------...--- --------------- --------- 1_. ..__. ___.�_._... .._....__4.__-----------1-------- - 16 1 l0 � t 1 2 _.. .._.. __.---------..__...--....___._--- . .. . ____ .._ _. -�- --�- -----------__. .__..__. _._.. _ _._ _....._ - --- - --- --� - _.------.._. ---- ---�- --- -�--...__. _ _3, 272.00 -- f -- --3 � -�--- --- - ---r----------- _.20 40 . - �----___..... . .. . -- - , - -. .---..._ 4 __ .--- B. Plans and 3 dfications --_._._.. ..---3.-.-.-- ---------.___. ----.____...---.-.---.--------_.____�-----___�._._.____ __ : . --- _--- ---._ ___ .---_--------� --------------__-�-----�---------------- --------.__ �_.______. _._._....�.._ ............._..._....-_----._..__.---.-.--�_----._._.._.---.--__._..._.._......_._...-----.-.---_------_--_.___..------._....__.-----.____—_____.__._..__.._____._...________.___._.___�_.__.____----____.._._....-------�----__�..-.-------...-----.----- .---�00--.-- .�----.-----_...9,916.00 _ __ ._...-------��.-.---.5torm water Mana�ement_------------._�...__---..__...._. __._----.____._._._._..___._.__.__..--- -----------1---.------__...._.�_... _._. . __._....-----._.____.---�.__.._____,10_--.--.-.---... _____._---- 8____._---__._._....__-.----..___.,-----------._____i.._.-----.-.--.--------___.___. �.----.----.----- - � 19 $ 1,862.00 __ . . , , � - ------. _......__. .�-.-.---._.___._.___._ _------.-- ------_._..... _.___.__.-.-.------- -.--__._.__..__._.___._ ._.-----------.b._._._..Perauttin� - -------�---�---�---..�_._._.._.____ _ . ....... .............._..__.....___......�..._---..___..----------- -- ---�----�-------_�..__..._._�.----..--._._._l__�_.._ ._.._.--- I.__--------�-8-----�--....__.........---_.--------2-------------- ----_...----�--�-------- � ' � 11 $ 1 174�00 , _..-----t-----�-�----------------�---..---------------------- ...............___f_-�--------...... _.--------�---- ----- --. .,----------------'-_�_.----�__ _ E. Easernents 8 I 10 10 4 � � ! 32 $ 3 308.00 _,._._...... -- -- _...__...---------�----�-�-------_______.__.__.._.____.._____..__._..__...---�----�--�---------------------------------...----------- --...__. ._. _. __ _ ..,. --. __._. .---_. -----------� ---�-----_ ____.__..._...._....__ ._...__.--------------...._...., ---....-- -._--------------------._._._....._..._.------------------_......._.---- -�------- � _ F. Final Assessment Roll ; � 2 � 6 � + -_____._._..____.----�--------------- __--------.-- ----._..__-- ---------._.___.__--.-•---.--.--- _._..--- ---- ---- -------- �-----_..--...__.__.._--------�--...-- -------------_.__----.._.._._ .. _.. __----- - --. .. __...._ . ..._._ _ . ..._ . _. . ---- -- ---- ---..... . . . _ _ ._ _ _ __._ ._ --------------- -----... _._.. �......---�---------- -- -. _. .__ _ _ ___..._ .- ----._ . _..._..--- -- -- --�----��--- ��- ----�---�-- -...----- -- ..._ _._ _._ _ �. _ �... . G Biddin Administration and Contracts ._�.. - ; - - - --. _.._ .. ..- -.-- . -- 9----- --.--._.---- -.--- -.- - -�8 5_ 00--- _._____..__...----•---------------�----�--------..�-�-------------�---�------�---..._._..__.__._ ... .,_._.....---. . - - - � 10 � 20 � 4 34 $ 2 804.00 . _ _. .. . �._ _ _ _-- - - �- - -._ _ _ _ - - - - -�------ -- . ._ .._, ._ ..._...... .. ....__ .- -- -----�---._. ._...___...._ ._... _ ---------- ------ _ .._.._-- - ------- -�- ----. _ . _ ....; _ --�-- ---- --�------__ .._.._._ - _. .... .. _ �---------. ._.___...------- ---___-._ ._--�--�--�------� � --------_�._ Subtotal 2 - _ _ __. , . _... i� ;. _ . _ ' 92 76 45 10 238 $ 23,121.00 4 Construction Services � ; ' ; : - - - - - .. .. , ._.. _.__�_ _._---- ---------�---__ ------------------_.._-____�._--� ------..___.---.--__.___._..-------_.._..----._ _.------.__._---- _ -_ ----�--.__.... --- ----- --- ---.._....�__._...-------------------- ---��--._.�__�__--_.-------------- ---- -------...----------�---.____...----�-------...._-----------�---____._._.___----------�.___.___.__-----�---�-- A. Construction (7bservatlon 16 weeks 45 hr/week --..�----_. __�_____.�._-----_------� .___.___.._--------------------_----.-----------____�_________.�__.__._____._....__�.-°�._-----.�_._-----.._�__..__.--------------._. _ ---...._._ ._.-.- --- . -- - ; ; � i 720 I 720 $ 44 640.00 . _. ... _ __.__,..._.._._..__......__...---...---...-------�---�---�-----.___.___.___�__---�----..------�---....----�-�-�--�--�--�..___.__.__.._....--------- -----_�_____�__._..---...----�----��----_•___�__..._._._.___-----------7..______.__..____._------ -�- ---- ' ------..__ _._. --.---_-._B�_.--5��--�.__.�__.r_____----------------_ -- � ; I . ____ _�____._. . _.___ - ----------- �---�-------�..__-----..._�_. _ _ ___.�.__ _ . . _..----_..__..,_..----._... -;-- ----�----._.__._. ------..---..._-7---�---�--..___...._--�-----.___ � _.._--�-----._._�_...__ ___..._.. -------�---__.----.____..__..; 4 C. Construction Administration.----_---.___.------�---------------------__.--- -------- -------� --- ----- � 28 , ,---._�-----�---.__..___..__..._;__._.__.-------._____..-�----�---------------...---.__.._ __.. _ 40 5, 600.00 -� ; ; ------ ---_...-------- _ .____..._--- ----�----------------.________..__.�.�_� , 6 _ . ... �.__.__._ _..._. .____...__..__._.---.._..._. ___.__...__,_..._ _�--__.__.----------- - - ' 34.. _$ 3 382.OU .-�---...---�------- —_- ---_ ___...___..._____.----__ � D. Record Drawin � ; ------- -------� � � - - -�--.�..___..___----�--------_..+-__�._ ------------..._ ._--_-� -------�----_._.._ -------- -�--___-----�------�--._.__. ----�---------�--------------�—�---_.---�-------- ' ' 4 6 _ ._ _ _ _.._. _.. -� - - ' �---�--�------�----- lb $ 1 260 00 ------- �--�------�- ----� --�--�---�-----. �_ ._____-�---- ------------�------�---..__---�------...--{-��------�---.--_____.______ __.--_._____-___._.__._.-�--..___-"--- -------_.-_i___._----------------- ______ _._---_..___--' - '---._ Subtotal � 28 4 ' 46 720 � 6 804 $ 54,882.00 Total Hours 4 15 138 90 56 � 62 � 720 20 1105 our Cosis $134.00 $126,00 $112.00 $76.00 $105.00 $140.00 i $62.00 $41.00 Total Direct Labor Costs $536.Ob $1 890.00 $15,456.00 $6,840.n0 $5,880.00 $8,684.00 $44,640.00 $820.00 $ 84,742.00 , ; � � f i � � V il�� :. ;�. � �� _. ��v . c� - : : _ . o . __.. I . .: : � ua�e : _ eer Education: 8achelor of C�vil Engineering, Minor in Construction Management, University of Nlinnesota, 2009 - �J�SB ,.....� & Associu�es, I�c. A##er gradua#ing from the University of Minnesota, Matt joined VIISB's Municipal Group ir� June 2009. He is experienced in construc#ion inspection, compiling es#imates, and a�ding in munici�a� design. Matt is knovvledgeabie �r� Au#oCA�, MicroS#ation, Microsofit Projec#, SureTrak, MnPAVE, and HydroCAD� SELECTED PR4JECT EXPERiENCE Anoka County Highway Department Intern {2006 — 2009) • Supervised construction of t�e 2008 county overlay construction projec#s • Communicated with con#ractors, project supervisors, engineers, �echnicians, and surveyors #o schedule activ�ties, collabora#e information, clarify construction plan details, and #o resolve confiicts • lnspected construction activities including grade construction, soii correction, asp�al# �aving, stflrm sewer, etc. � Execu#ed construc#ion and topographic surveys using instruments inciuding GPS ur�i#s and �otal Sta�ions • Used engineering sof#ware to cornpu#e fi�gures and complete documents necessa�y #or project design, and cos# estimation • Compiled and documented construction quanti#ies #or project closeou# Construction �'echnician {2fl04 — 2006) � Assessed job sites and develop plans tha# coinc�de wit#� orders of �nanager and reques# o# customers • Followed �echnical plans and instruc#ion guides #o repair and assemble complex items • Operated and mainiained company vehicles, tools, and machinery • Performed numerous cons#ruction, remodeling and landscaping tas ks �� f �� ■ EN HILLS CITY UF ARDEN HILLS COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2009-027 A RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR THE 2010 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PR4GRAM WHEREAS, it is proposed to improve the following streets: Valentine Crest Road, from Valentine Avenue to cul de sac, Valentine Avenue, from Lake Valentine Road to Old Highway 10, Valentine Court, from Valentine Avenue to cul de sac, Janet Court, from Lake Valentine Road to cul de sac, Katie Lane, from Cleveland Avenue to 1272 feet south, Katie Court, from Katie Lane to cul de sac, and to assess the benefited property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ARDEN HILLS 1VIIl�TNESOTA: That the proposed improvement be referred to the 2010 Pavement Management Program for study and that the City Engineer is instructed to report to the council with all convenient speed advising the council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARDEN HILLS THIS 12th DAY OF OCTOBER, 2009. Stanley D. Harpstead, Mayor ATTEST: Ronald J. Moorse, City Administrator