HomeMy WebLinkAbout1A, Planning Case 09-003, Zoning Code Amendment EII'H. ILLS
MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 3, 2010 Item l.A
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Meagan Beekman, City Planner
SUBJECT: Planning Case#09-003
Zoning Code Amendment
Shoreland Regulation
City_of Arden Hills
Background
The current set of shoreland regulations was updated in early 2002 to address certain
requirements in the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) shoreland regulations.
While that ordinance update did address some of the technical requirements set by the DNR,
there were a number of holes and unaddressed issues remaining after that update. Concurrently,
Staff has been faced with a number of questions and concerns expressed by local property
owners that are not explicitly addressed in the existing ordinance. These scenarios have
introduced the need for greater clarification to the City's shoreland ordinance so that Staff may _
be able to promptly address common issues and concerns as they pertain to public waters and
wetlands.
Over the past year Staff has met with the Planning Commission, the City Council, and the
community to discuss amending the City's Shoreland Regulations. Over the course of several
work sessions, Staff was able to identify common goals shared by the Planning Commission and
the City Council for the revised regulations. A community meeting was held on May 21, 2009,
to discuss ideas for the amendments with those individuals who lived within the Shoreland
District. Approximately 80 lake shore lot owners attended the meeting.
Once the initial input was gathered, Staff began drafting the proposed amendments. As revisions
were made the City website was updated with new information, and new drafts were emailed out
to participants of the community meeting. The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed
draft at both their July and August work sessions. At these meetings the Planning Commission
discussed the proposed changes to the regulations and provided Staff with feedback.
City of'Arden Hills
City Council Work Session for February 16, 2010
\Metro-inet.usardenhillsTlanning\Planning Cases\2009\09-003 Shoreland Presmation Ordinance(Pending)\02-16-10-Work Session-Memo
Shoreland Regulations.doc Page 1 of 5
Staff also discussed the proposed changes internally amongst Code Enforcement, Parks and
Recreation, Public Works, Engineering, and Building. The goal was to broaden the context of
which the amended regulations were drafted. In addition to internal discussion, Staff discussed
the amendments with the City Attorney, the DNR, Ramsey County Conservation District, and
the Rice Creek Watershed District.
At their September 21, 2009, work session the City Council reviewed the proposed draft, made
additional comments, and directed Staff to bring the ordinance to the Planning Commission for a
public hearing and recommendation.
At the November 4, 2009, public hearing a number of concerns and questions were raised by
both the Planning Commission and residents. The Planning Commission voted to table the
proposed Zoning Code amendments to a work session in order to further discuss the issue and
provide direction to staff on how to proceed with the proposed amendments. The Planning
Commission met at a work session on January 6, 2010, to discuss the concerns raised at the
previous meeting.
A revised draft was prepared based on the discussions at the previous work session. At that time
Staff also included an amendment to the "Adjacent Lots"regulation based on input from the
Planning Commission, researching neighboring communities, and internal discussions. On
February 3, 2010, the Planning Commission held a second public hearing on the proposed
regulations. The major concern brought up at that meeting was in regards to the "Adjacent Lots"
regulation and in particular one aspect of the proposed amendment that would remove a
shoreline property owner's ability to construct an addition within 50 feet of the lake when
adjacent properties exceeded this amount. The proposed language would require all new
construction to meet the average setback of the adjacent properties, minus ten feet, as illustrated
in Attachment A.
The Planning Commission, while agreeing that the vast majority of the proposed changes would
be to the benefit of the community as a whole could not find consensus on the adjacent lot
change in the ordinance. The Planning Commission chose to move the ordinance forward to the
City Council with no recommendation.
Proposed Amendments
Definitions (Attachmentd
Amended pages from Section 1305 have been included in this packet. These are the definitions
that are proposed to be added or amended with the adoption of the Shoreland Management
Ordinance. Most of the changes come directly from the DNR regulations and are required to be
changed to bring the City regulations into compliance with the DNR. A number of definitions
have been deleted that are not used anywhere in the City's ordinance.
City of Arden Hills
City Council Work Session for February 16, 2010
IlMetro-inet.uslardenhillslPlanninglPlanning Cases 12009109-003Shoreland Preservation Ordinance(Pending)102-16-10-Work Session-Memo
-Shoreland Regulations.doc Page 2 of 5
Shoreland Regulations (Attachment B)
Section 1330 has been included in its entirety. This section includes the most number of
changes. The changes were included to reflect current DNR regulations, clarify current
enforcement practice in the shoreland area, and to reflect growing concern amongst City Council
and other residents about issues facing the shoreland. Revisions to the draft since the November
45 2009, meeting have been highlighted.
Below is a list and summary of changes made to the Shoreland Regulation Section 1330. Staff
also has prepared a handout with diagrams that summarizes the proposed changes (Attachment
A).
1. Purpose—A purpose statement was added that clearly lists the goals of Section 1330.
2. Adjacent Lots— Staff is proposing an amendment to the regulation that addresses
construction on lots when there are two adjacent developed lots that exceed the minimum
setback to the lake (50 feet on Lake Johanna). The proposed regulation would require
that new construction, and additions to existing homes, have a minimum setback that
meets the average setback of the two adjacent lots minus ten feet.
The existing regulations require new homes in this situation to meet the average setback -
of the two adjacent properties; however, additions to homes need only meet the minimum
setback to the lake. In essence this has created a"loophole"within the Code. The
proposed amendment would remove the loophole that allows additions to be constructed
up to the minimum setback line, thus reducing property rights that lakeshore lot owners
currently enjoy. In order to inject some flexibility into the Code, Staff is proposing that
all new construction, including additions, meet the average of the two adjacent homes,
minus ten feet. A ten foot expansion would continue to protect sightlines for neighboring
properties owners, but allow lakeshore lot owners some flexibility when improving their
properties. Dwellings would still be required to meet the minimum lake setback.
The fact that most properties around the City's lakes are nonconforming in some way
makes improving lots difficult. Many lots are substandard and have homes that already
encroach into the existing setback requirements. One of the questions that the City must
grapple with is how to address the balance between maintaining the quality of housing
stock and community character that Arden Hills' enjoys while still allowing people to
continue to improve their homes. Staff feels that the proposed amendment allowing the
"minus ten feet" flexibility provides a middle ground that maintains the site lines of
homes on the lake while allowing existing lakeshore lot owners to improve their homes if
they choose.
3. Exceptions to Structure Setbacks—The proposed regulations broaden and clarify what
structures are permitted within the normal structure setback to the lake. Docks and
City of Arden Hills
City Council Work Session for February 16, 2010
IlMetro-inet.uslardenhillslPlanninglPlanning Cases 12009109-003Shoreland Preservation Ordinance(Pending)102-16-10-Work Session-Memo
-Shoreland Regulations.doc Page 3 of 5
boatlifts are now specifically mentioned as having no restrictions in terms of setbacks to
the lake. Additionally,patios, stairways, access lifts, landings, fences, and one accessory
storage shed are now permitted within the structure setback to the lake under certain
circumstances.
a. Patios—A regulation permitting uncovered patios within the structure setback to
the lake, under certain circumstances, has been added to the regulations. The
patios must be uncovered, located at grade, and remain outside of the Shore
Impact Zone.
b. Stairway landings—The proposed ordinance limits the square feet of landings
within the Shore Impact Zone to 40 feet.
c. Storage sheds—The proposed ordinance permits one accessory storage shed
within the structure setback to the lake provided that it is not located within the
shore impact zone (25 feet on Lake Johanna) and does not exceed 64 square feet
in size or eight feet in height. The structures can be connected to electricity and
lighting is permitted. Separate regulations within the Code limit glare as a
nuisance.
4. Dock setbacks—The proposed regulations include a five foot setback for dock placement -
at the shoreline. There is also an added provision that would allow the Zoning
Administer to alter this regulation if topography or lot width created a significant
limitation on dock placement on a particular lot.
5. Mitigation—A mitigation plan similar to the one used by Shoreview has been added in
place of the permeable surface credit that was proposed previously by Staff. The new
language would require all properties seeking special approval from the City through a
variance or conditional use permit to provide a mitigation plan to the City. The
mitigation plan would also be required if a property wanted to increase the impervious
coverage by up to five percent with a pervious hard surface.
Performance Standards (Attachment Q
Section 1325.07 included regulations on lakefront lots; however, that section has been removed
from Section 1325 and reincorporated into Section 1330. These regulations have not otherwise
been altered.
Requested Action
Discuss Planning Case 2009-003 to amend the City's Shoreland Regulations
City of Arden Hills
City Council Work Session for February 16, 2010
IlMetro-inet.uslardenhillsManning0anning Cases12009W9-003 Shoreland Preservation Ordinance(Pending)IO2-16-10-Work Session-Memo
-Shoreland Regulations.doc Page 4 of 5
The proposed amendments impact three sections of the Zoning Code:
• Section 1305.04, Definitions (Attachment A)
• Section 1330, Shoreland Regulations (Attachment B)
• Section 1325.07, Performance Standards (Attachment C)
Attachments
A. Summary of Proposed Changes Handout
B. Section 1330, Shoreland Regulations—Black-lined version
C. February 3, 2010, Draft Planning Commission Minutes
D. Public Comments
E. Shoreland District Map
City of Arden Hills
City Council Work Session for February 16, 2010
1 Wetro-inet.us lardenhills 0anningManning Cases12009109-003 Shoreland Preservation Ordinance(Pending)102-16-10-Work Session-Memo
-Shoreland Regulations.doc Page 5 of 5
Attachment A
Summary of Proposed Changes Handout
NllllS
City of Arden Hills
City Council Work Session for February 16, 2010
•
ProposedS ore a Regulations
-Ali NN HILLS
en �rnents, �ummarY
As regulated by the DNR since 1973,the City has a section in the Zoning Code regulating uses within
the Shoreland District. The City is proposing a number of amendments to these regulations in order
to bring the City's regulations into compliance with DNR standards, improve water quality, increase
the enjoyment of the lakes for everyone in our community, and clarify the language to make en-
forcement of the Citv's regulations an easier task. Below is a brief summary of the most notable
changes being proposed.
Summary of Proposed Changes to Section 1330, the City's Shoreland Regulations
Shore Impact Zone-This is a new definition within the regulations that refers to the land located between
the lake and one-half of the structure setback. In the case of Lake Johanna, the lakeshore setback is 50 feet,
so the Shore Impact Zone would be the first 25 feet along the shoreline.
Exceptions to Structure Setback Requirements -The proposed regulations would now allow docks,
fences,stairways, accessibility-lifts, patios; and landings within the Shore Impact Zone, under certain condi-
tions. The current City-regulations do not expressly allow these items; however, it has been practice to allow
them in the past. Additionally, the proposed regulations include language that would now permit up to one
accessory storage shed mthin the lakeshore setback under certain circumstances.
Adjacent Lots — The existing regulations treat the construction of new homes and additions to existing
homes differently. Under the existing regulations, a new home cannot be closer to the lake than the average
setback of the two adjacent homes. The primary-purpose of this limitation is to protect the views of the lake
for existing homes. However, a loophole in the existing regulations allows additions to be constructed up to
the minimum structure setback line regardless of the two adjacent homes. The proposed regulations require -
that new homes, and additions to existing homes, meet the average setback of the two adjacent lots minus
ten feet. This change removes the loophole for additions but provides some flexibility for lake lot owners to
improve their homes. The minimum structure setback to the lake would still apply regardless of the setbacks
of adjacent homes. For an illustration, please see the other side of this document.
Maintenance of the Shoreland — The proposed regulations would require items (i.e.; bouts, boatlifts,
docks) that are in a state of disrepair or inoperable be prohibited from being stored outdoors. The proposed
ordinance does not include specific restrictions on storing non-motorized watercraft,such as canoes,kayaks,
etc.
Dock setbacks —The proposed regulations include a five foot setback for dock placement at the shoreline.
The Zoning Administrator may alter this regulation if topography or lot width created a significant limitation
on dock placement for a particular lot.
Permeable Surface Credit —The proposed regulations would permit permeable surfaces in excess of the
maximum hard cover requirement, in direct proportion to the permeability of the surface, in exchange for an
approved mitigation plan. Permeable surfaces can be a green component to building projects.
Mitigation Plan — The proposed regulations would require all properties seeking special approval from
the City through a variance or conditional use permit to provide a mitigation plan to the City_ The mitigation
plan would also be required if a property wanted to use the Permeable Surface Credit. The mitigation plan
would consist of installing a rain garden or native vegetative buffer along the shoreline, removing non-
conforming structures, constructing new structures with natural looking materials, or implementing some
other form of shoreland improvement,subject to City approval.
1245 West Highway 96 Arden Hills,MN 55112 Phone: 651-792-7806 Website:w ww.ci.arden-hilis_rnn.us
Adjacent Lots Regulation—Existi*ng
---A EN HILLS andProposedExamples
Proposed Regulation
t.
95t. 75 75
t-
Proposed Home Existing Home
Existing Home Proposed
Addition
A new home.or addition.would be
required to be setback the average of
the txvo adjacent homes_minus ten
feet-
ExistingRegulationExistin for Addition
50 ft.
75 ft.
95 ft.
Proposed
Addition
Existingome Existing Home
Existing Home
A ne«v addition can be setback up to
the structure setback to the lake.
ExistingRegulation for New Home
95 ft. 8 ft.
75 ft.
Pro osed Home Existing Home
Evsting Home p HomeHome
A ne«v home is required to be setback
the average of the txvo adjacent
homes
Attachment B
Section 1330, Shoreland Regulations —
Black-lined version
EN kllLLS
City of Arden Hills
City Council Work Session for February 16, 2010
,City of Arden Hips Chapter 13 Zoning Code
Section 1330- Shoreland Regulations
1330.01 General Provisions_
Subd. 1 P-ufpese-and--Intent. The uncontrolled use of shorelands of-within the City
of Arden Hills affects the public health, safety and general welfare not only by
contributing to pollution of public waters, but also by impairing the local tax base.
Therefore, it is in the best interest of the public health, safety and welfare to provide
for the wise development of shorelands of public waters. The Legislature of
Minnesota has delegated responsibility to the municipalities of the State to regulate
the subdivision, use_,. and development of the shorelands of public waters and thus
preserve and enhance the quality of surface waters, preserve the economic and natural
environmental values of shorelands, and provide for the wise utilization of waters and
related land resources. This responsibility shall hereby be recognized by the City of
Arden Hills.
Subd. 2 Purpose. To achieve the policies described in the Cit 's Comprehensive
Plan and_State and Federal policies and statutes the City intends to determine, control
and guide future development within and surrounding those land areas which are
contiguous to desi ated bodies of public water and areas of as herein defined and
regulated_S ecif cally, the City of Arden Hills Purports to:
Re gujate thei)lacement of sanitary-and storm water dls�osal facilities
on lots;
2. Regulate the area of a lot, the length of water frontage suitable for a
building site, and setbacks;
Regulate alteration of the shorelands and wetlands of public waters
4. Control natural environment areas of ecological value to maintain
existing�aquatic, vegetation, and wildlife conditions to the maximut-n
extent possible;
5. Promote the use of native ve etation as a means_to increase
stormwater infiltration, provide natural view sheds and screen
structures and parking areas as viewed from public waters.
S* :2Subd. 3 —StatutoryAuthorization. This Section shall--isbe-- adopted pursuant
__ p
to the authorization contained in furtherance of the policies declared in Minnesota
Statutes ChaptersS.P.P.-tions 105 and 462 and Minnesota Re ulations Parts
612 0.2 5 00-6120.3 900.
!Q311hJ In• •
favo _o f to-C`�t✓y;-end-its- -it dun c ;end-shy l f nit-be-deny -a l i 41-at-to-n-oir-fe-peal
- p
ofand other ant .
Subd.4 Abrogation and Greater Restrictions_ It shall not be intended by this
Section to repeal, abrogate or impair any existing easements, covenants or deed
restrictions. However, where this Section imposes greater restrictions, the provisions
of this Section shall prevail.
Section 1330—Shoreland Regulations
Adopted: November 13,2006
Page 1 of 1398S
City of Arden Hills Chapter 13 Zoning Code
Subd. 5 A Jurisdiction. This Section shall apply to all lands located
within the boundaries of the shoreland
1330.02 Shoreland Management Districts and uses.
Subd. 1 Classification of Lakes. In order to guide the wise development and
utilization of shorelands of protected waters for the preservation of water quality,
natural characteristics, economic values and general health, safety and welfare,
certain protected waters in the City have been given a shoreland management
classification. These protected waters of the City have been classified below
consistent with the criteria found in Minnesota Regulations, Part b 120.33®0,_and the
Protected waters Invento Map_for Ramsey County, Minnesota.
by4he-eoni r--of-n-atul.1%
Section 1330-Shoreland Regulations
Adopted: November 13,2006
Page 2 of 1 3
City of Arden Hips Chapter 13 Zoning Code
HNR I.M.No..
General Development Lakes:
Josephine 62-57
-.-----...................- ---------......_.
Johanna 62-78
KarthL-iuk-Jeha- 62-7262 58
... .. ...............................
Recreational Development Lakes:
Little Johanna 62-58
_ ........... _ _ ........................_ ._. _ ....._ ....................................._...._ ...........
Round Lake 62-70
Natural Eovlronm�ental Lakes:
Sunfish 62-65
.- -- -------- .......................-....---------- --............-.
Valentine 62-71
Subd. 2 Establishment of Shoreland Management Districts; Zoning Map. The
boundaries of the Sshoreland Mmanagement Ddistricts are hereby continued as
shown on the snap entitled '.'.Official Zoning Map of Arden Hills, Minnesota,' which
map shall be properly approved and filed in the office of the City Administrator. The
shoreland management districts overlay existing zoning districts of the City also
shown on the official zoning map pursuant to this Code and the City of Arden Hills
Zoning Code. As indicated in this Section, certain portions of the shorelands in the
shoreland management districts are classified general development, recreational
development, or natural environment lakes. The map and all of the notations,
references and other Information shown thereon shall have the same force and effect
as if set forth in this Section at length_
Subd. 3 Boundaries of Shoreland Management Districts. The boundaries of the
shoreland management districts shall be determined by scaling distances on the
official zoning map. where interpretation is needed as to the exact location of the
boundaries of a shoreland management district shown on the official zoning map, for
example inhere there appears to be a conflict between a mapped boundary and actual
field conditions, the City Council shall make the necessary interpretation based upon
topographic elevations and other available technical data. Persons contesting the
location of the shoreland management district boundaries shall be given a reasonable
opportunity to present their case to the City Council and to submit technical evidence.
Sttbd;4 Re-r-m-it-ted-t :-A l--pen fitted ��es--allowed_-and..._-regulated-�y-the-a �i abler
z-0n-ing---.--di--try-ct----underlying-the--Thor-e-I-an-d---ma-nag�e- nt--d-is-tri-cts--a-s- die d �--tl
Section 1330-Shoreland Regulations
Adopted: November 13,2006
Page 3 of-13
City of Arden Hips Chapter 13 Zoning Code
diet_
tArl • G-V f1I g "I�[�t �a n I the L7iAAIIl
-UJISH e-E S -LIS- di-mat-ed---o� e--offici-af-Zo ng-�p-�
he :
Su���b-i-ted-uses A-Any-Ter i-t-te-&-or--e-ond-i-t-io - --a�--�t-pew}�- '
3----as
Subd;;--S ---
-
oickntinlliad
• �ectien '��:
1330.03 General Provisions.
Subd. I District Requirements. The following standards shall apply to all
shorelands of the protected waters listed in this Section. Where the requirements of
the underlying zoning district as shown on the official zoning snap are more
restrictive than those set forth in this Section, then the more restrictive standards shall
apply:
Natural
Recreational
E'nL
virionmental General eve 0 Ment aterS.
`waters
IevelQpentatern
Lot Area(square feet): y 40,000 20 000 14 000
Riparian Lot '
-__ _ .- _ ___.._.-..,__ -. . . _........-- -- ....................................
... ..-
Lot Area(square feet): Non- 141,000(for District R-1)
Riparian Lot 14,000 14,000 11.000(for Districts R-2,R-3, R-4)
.......... .._......................................._......------......... -_.....
Minimum Water Frontage
and Width at Building Line - 125 75 75
(feet)
........... - -... --._...._................-...---. ._._�_._...... __. - _. _ ....... . . . _. _.. ..
.Structure Minimum Setback
from Ordinary High Water 150* 75* 50*
LevelMa (feet)
............................................................. ---------------------- ................. ............... ...........-------------- -- _...-- - ------ -------------------
...-
Structure Minimum Setbacks = 40 for Districts R-1,R-2, R-3, R-4
from Streets and Highways 50 for Districts B-1, B-2,I-2
(feet) 55 for District I-1
.............................................................. ------- v... . . .... ............ ....._... _. -. .. - -....... .._......-_
Structure Maximum Height 35 for District R-1. R-2.R-3, R-4, B-L B-2, I-1
(feet) 45 for District I-2
....... ........... ........... ........*,L.........._ ..... ......._.. .. --------_... .................
Maximum Lot Area Cov............................................. ............. .................ered 35 for District R-l.R-2,R-3, R-4
by Impervious Surface(%) 65 for District 1-1 _
75 for District B-1. B-2, I-2
*See Section 1330.03 Subd.4 for Excel.Lions to the Structure Setback Requirement
Section 1330—Shoreland Regulations
Adopted:November 13 2006
Page 4 of l 3
Citv of Arden Hills Chapter 13 Zoning Code
Su - Noneonfi Ildi I 1 4-3- �p --
_ _ __ z_._afl _
Wr -on, � me Of thk%e
% .E)H as
-for-i ft-S-tat-� tel: S S b ---e :e t f-r �n- �or n 1 'Lille- �
and-,1otra--�f _
A-.---n- e-u 1-s---per14ed-4-w�ong- sue
--A —ot her-- a n -end dn -- q nALI
LYA--th
Flie"W6 inonfiar -1- --aatipal nnd
e
uses, ait
Seee4i-on- - °D:—Nonconform g t�tures-a
a,;- -7
Su-hd 4Subd. 2 Roads and Parking Areas. Roads and parking areas shall be located
to retard the runoff of surface waters and nutrients in accordance with the following
criteria:
A. wbire feasihle--n - fac a-l;Aall roads and parking .areas shall meet
P p g
the setback requirements established for structures of this Section.
p-l-ae---ed--lam--th-an- f I%, ffr-om-tom-$rr hig-4i7w-ater--ma-r--k-.-
k
:---B. Natural vegetation or other natural materials shall be used to screen
parking areas when viewed from the water.
S-and:-5Subd.3 Elevation of Lowest Floor.
A. Structures shall be placed at an elevation consistent with the City"s
flood plain management controls as set forth in Section 1335 of this Code.
B. In areas not regulated by flood plain management controls, the
elevation to which the lowest floor, including basements, shall be placed
shall be determined as fol lows
1. For lakes, ponds, and flowages, by (a) an elevation of available
flood information and consistent with "Statewide Standards and
Criteria for Management of Flood Plain Areas of Minnesota," or (b)
placing the lowest floor at a level at least three (3) feet above the
highest known water level. In those instances where sufficient data on
Section 1330—Shoreland Regulations
Adopted.November 13,2006
Page 5 of 1398-8
City of Arden Hills Chapter 13 Zoning Code
known high water levels are not available, the ordi
a -''iah Aunt��
f- ordinary high water level shall be used.
2. For streams, by an evaluation of available flood information and
consistent with "Statewide Standards and Criteria for Management of
Flood Plain Areas of Minnesota."
Subd.4 Adjacent Lots. Where two existing adjacent dwellings have shoreline
setbacks that exceed the minimum setback from the ordinary high water level by ten
(10) or more feet, the shoreland setback for a new dwelling unit, or an addition to a
dwelling, shall not be less than the average of the shoreland setbacks for such existing
adjacent dwellings minus ten 10 feet. However, in no case shall the new structure
or addition be within the minimum setback from the ordinar.�gh water level as
stated in Section 1330.03 Subd 1.
Subd. 5 Exceptions to Structure Setback Requirements. No structure shall be
placed within the structure setback requirements of the shoreland management
district. The following_are not classified as structures for the purposes of this section:
A. "k.7"h�uses; einc., Docks and Boatlifts. Setback requirements from the
of--dingy-high--watefordinaryhigh water -level shall not apply to to
d-docks and boatlifts. Location of docks and boatlifts
shall be controlled by applicable State and local regulations.
B. Stairways, access lifts, and landings. Setback requirements from the
ordinary _water level shall_ not apply to stairways, access_lifts, or
landings. Stairways and access lifts are the preferred alternative to major
topographic alterations for achieving access up and down bluffs and sty
slopes to shore areas. Stairways, access lifts and landings located within
the Shore_ aet Zone shall meet the following design standards
1. Landings for stairways and lifts shall not exceed 40 square feet in
area.
3:-2. Canopies or roofs are not allowed on stairways, access lifts
or landings.
C. Uncovered patios` A_ grade uncovered patios that have an underside
surface that is entirely in contact with and wholly supported by the ground
may be placed within the structure setback requirements from the ordinary
high water level but shall not be placed within the Shore Impact Zone.
Uncovered___patios _shall not be _considered landscaped area when
calculatin lot covera e.
B-.--Fences. Chain link, or other types of fences with a transparency of at
least percent, nZay be_p aced within the structure setback re c uirements
Section 1330-Shoreland Regulations
Adopted:November 13,2006
Page 6 of.1-398-8
City of Arden Hills Chapter 13 Zoning Code
from the ordinary high water level but shall not be placed within the Shore
Impact Zone-
D.
E. Lakeshore lots may be permitted one(I) accessory storage shed within
the required structure setback from the ordinary high water level provided
that it:
I. Is not located within the Shore Impact Zone.
2. Does not exceed 64 square feet in size and eight (8) feet in height,
measured to the highest point of the structure.
3._ Is not desigped or used for human habitation and does not contain
a water suppI or sewage treatment facilities.
n--u d---rho -- --111 -� - mac- ---lobs
stfuetu -tie-ter w to �r --1,_."W'j- , �..I I.Awvef
water lelvze.0.1
w�tn-the-- � n�..�,P', ,.,._,..-_the-ord ��--w�---lqs-s-ted
Subd. 6 Maintenance of shoreland. The shoreland shall present a neat and not
unsightly appearance from the water.,
ater and shall be protected from adverse conditions
affectin the public.
A. Up to ten (10) percent of the shoreline of a property may be utilized
for docks, but no property, shall be limited to less than four feet of the
shoreline for the utilization of a dock, subject_to DNR regulations. At
B. Docks shall be setback a minimum of five (5) feet from side property
lines at the point of attachment to the shoreline This requirement npa_ybe
adjusted by the Zoning Administrator in cases where topogTaphy. or lot
width significantly limits the placement of docks.
C. Watercraft and other water eq�ui -ment shall be stored in accordance
with Section 1325.12 Recreational Vehicle UtilityTrailer Ridin Lawn
Mower, and Watercraft Outdoor Storage, and be kept in a neat and orderly
manner.
D. The rental of dock space shall be prohibited.
E. Boatiifts, docks, watercraft, accessory structures, and any other
equipa that is in a.state_of_disrepair, inoperable or otherwise unusable
shall not be stored outdoors.
Section 1330-Shoreland Regulations
Adopted:November 13,2006
Page 7 of 139M
City of Arden Hips Chapter 13 Zoning Code
F. Grading or otherwise removing; natural cover from the Shore Impact
Zone or cutting or fillies which changes the natural shoreline shall be
prohibited without proper permits.
G. The accumulation of debris,; the creation or maintenance of safety
hazards,;and similar coed—t.i_ensactivities shall be prohibited.
uses special us-es
e-- el�,"a nageme----dic e s--%3 lull -Ai----seed--.--w --p C---.see r--
Shoreland Alterations.
S u bd. 7
A. Removal of Ve etation. The removal of vegetation
g g
shall be restricted to prevent erosion into protected waters, to consume
nutrients in the soil, and to preserve shoreland aesthetics. Removal of
-vegetation in the shoreland management districts shall be subject
g J
to the following provisions:
I. In Shore Impact Zones and on steep slopes, limited clearing cif
trees and shrubs for access to the shoreline and cutting, and
trimming of trees is allowed provided that a minimum of seventy-five
(75)percent of the Shore Impact Zone be left in its natural state.
2. The minimal amount of vegetation shall be altered and sufficient
vegetative cover shall remain to screen cars, dwellings and other
structures when viewed from public waters.
. `ta! rts�ic> r t r �af
Except for the removal of Invasive specesa c �� oo -�
fInh irn, i paptnti"n Ph al l�
ewer-f---em ns---t,o--s-e-r-een----c--ar- ,- w-Afing5----and---oar--SAL -des-
_
L:
3. lear-cutting of,, ..,,.I-vegetation shall be prohibited.
2:-- Native-vegetation shall be restored insofar as feasible after
any construction project is completed to retard surface runoff and soil
erosion.
4.
5. All disturbed areas are restored to prevent soil erosion.
6. The above provisions are not applicable to the removal of trees
I imbs, or branches that are dead, diseased, or pose safety hazards.
Section 1330—Shoreland Regulations
Adopted:November 13,2006
Page 8 of 1398-8
City of Arden Hills Chapter 13 Zoning Code
Grading and Filling. �r���r,g Vinci f:tlincs tr c.�-►�r�►�n t
Vl(ttilli (illil lllill
land Q
� feel.- - r-hued
--{4� �}-C � yr--ac- -�� ;--��r-- s
re :- hit - -be- d --and--aed--�u--ate -e,
:All
land disturbance activity in the Shoreland 1Vlana.gement District shall be
subject to the provisions of Chapter 15 of the City Code, Erosion and
Sediment Control.
B.
C:----
ttma nQ fionsjilble
jul Oh h- and
> >
GdII", nCs:311a11_he_employ-
• 9
M_ _-- Shoreline Alterations. Any work which shall
change or diminish the course, current or cross section of a protected
water or wetland, or shall alter the shoreline below the ordinaryhi h water
level, shall be appro-ved subtect---to approval__by the Commissioner of
Natural Resources, and the approval shall be construed to mean the
issuance by the Commissioner of Natural Resources of a permit under the
procedures of Minnesota Statutes-— - i ---aidhe - elated
sta-tu-tes-..
C.
D. Penneable Surface Credit. At the discretion of the zoning
Administrator up to five percent of a lot's re uired lands ca ed area., but
not exceedingg 700 square feet, may be covered with pervious hard
surfaces subject to the approval of a Shoreland Mitigation Plan.
E. Shoreland Mitigation. A shoreland mitigation plan must be submitted
for residential development that requires land use approval including but
not limited to variances, conditional use permits; subdivisions; rezonin s-
or a ermeable surface credit. The plan shall be designed to mitigate
Section 1330—Shoreland Regulations
Adopted:November 13,2006
Page 9 of 139-8-9
City of Arden Hills Chapter 13 Zoning Code
the adverse effects land development has on water quality and the lake
environment. The mitigation plan shall be signed by the property owner,
approved by the Zoning., Administrator, and a Mitigation Affidavit
recorded with the Re 'ster of Deeds rior to the commencement of
development activity. Furthermore, mitigation plans shall be completed
within one year of the pIan's approval unless otherwise approved by the
City. An escrow fee that shall be held for a minimum of two years shall
also be submitte 61. The mitigation plan shall include at a minimum two
of the following practices.
1. Vegetation Restoration. Vegetation restoration areas m y_ be
established which at a minimum shall include land within the shore
and the bluff impact zones or steep slopes. Land area shall be
restored from lawn beach or other disturbances using native or
natural landscaping.
a. _Steep Slope/Bluff Restoration. Steep slopes and bluffs that are
v etated with turf may be restored with deciduous and
ornamental trees, evergreens and shrubs that are native to the
area.
b. Shoreline .Buffer Restoration. A buffer zone of at least 25 feet
from and parallel to the ordinary high water mark shall be
planted or restored and maintained with vegetation native to
the area to fullest practicable extent possible with effective
erosion and sediment control. Exist__ ing natural beaches or
beaches which have been permitted by the DNR shall be
allowed to continue and be maintained. A minimum of 30
percent% of the lot's shoreline area shall be restored. This
restoration area shall be contiguous unless otherwise approved
as part of the mitigation plan.
2. Architectural Mass. The use of natural color(s) and/or materials on
the exterior of the structure shall be used to reduce the visual
impact. Natural colors are shades of brown, gray, and green.
Natural materials include wood or stone that complement the
setting of the structure.
3. Removal of Nonconforming Structures. The mitigation plan may
include the removal of structures that do not comply with the
required structure setbacks from the ordinary high water line or are
located within a shore impact zone or bluff impact zone.
4. Reduction of Impervious Surface Coverage. The mitigation plan
may include a minimum five percent-°% reduction of the existing
impervious surface _coverage.,The preferable location of this
reduction is within that portion of the lot that drains to the lake.
Section 1330-Shoreland Regulations
Adopted: November 13,2006
Page 10 of 13
City of Arden Hills Chapter 13 Zoning Code
5. Other Practices. At the discretion of the Zoning Administrator,
other restoration or protection activities maybe approved as part of
a mitigation plan provided they meet the objectives of this
ordinance. Examples include the removal of artificial sand
beaches, stormwater management and replacement of seawalls
with bioengineenng�structures.
Subd. 8 Subdivisions. No land shall be subdivided which shall be held unsuitable
by the City for the proposed use because of flooding, inadequate drainage, soil and
rock formations with severe limitations for development, severe erosion potential,
unfavorable topography, inadequate water supply or sewer access, or any other
feature likely to be hannful to the health, safety, or welfare of future residents of the
proposed subdivision or of the community.
Subd. 9 Planned unit Developments. Planned Uunit Ddevelopments may be
permitted in accordance with this Code and the City of Arden Hills Zoning Code,
provided that preliminary plans are approved by the Commissioner of Natural
Resources prior to their approval by the City, and further provided that:
A. Open space is preserved through the use of restrictive deed covenants',
public dedications, or other methods.
B. The following factors shall be carefully evaluated to ensure the
increased density of development shall be consistent with the resource
limitations of the protected water:
1. Suitability of the site for the proposed use;
2. Physical and aesthetic impact of increased density;
3. Level of current development;
4. Amount and ownership of undeveloped shoreland;
5. Levels and types of water surface use and public accesses;
6. Passible effects on overall public use.
1330.04 Notification of the Commissioner of Natural Resources.
-1110 Subd. 1 _ ,
FelideGT� Ca
Vj
Section 1330-Shoreland Regulations
Adopted:November 13,2006
Page l l of 1 3
City of Arden Hills Chapter 13 Zoning Code
4 12 Qa]d at' n" tho f1nnr_"PFtOL1:i-,Chfi and 11CP "Enrnto'c.-fad
- - - cc "
nc ripf;
I. ....-I....Lions con
ti"roc rf the G-+n "unlittr Rc1nFd:
L tI%1IIJ lli LII%6 .. _
I)-- -he ftn-a--pi-an—f-ar----a--plau-n-ed--u-it---dove h it- o4fi-e a nd ;
20!lalm'Cl_ �d�-of ot1h aI t--efed--nn]1 -
9
- s_}ter nr� t�a rrmmccrrcar
Ityl
Su-bd:-----�--��Van-a--n-ees:-- nnnc-e-s--t-o--the-�-� s-o � - � _
�- - -
Ard
B-3-0.04 AdmIni-st.rat on
p_r.�'c�ct
'L:1J11J1iUlll'1J11 ..I Y�i�t:. J.,
/�{�Jt _ ..._*1 .�.._.i. .p. Y-�y�*• t. .y-�.. ,l c` �1 y� �Ct a n_ �} p } y�i f 1 ,p�
�l i �L I'lUi L�Se er111 LSD v Cti 1 11c�.J(illd j�ltlil � t L %Wt ilt C lilil �r� lJ is
tocated----withi-n---shoro 1an-d----manag-rneent..distn'ets----s all----be---su-hject-.-too?---and-----ad-mi-ni-s-te-r-ed
by;...i-n....ad-dition to the---prov s-o-ns..of-this---Sect-i.o-n---all--applic-able---pr-ovi-s-ions----o-f--thi_---bode
ai ld...th,�a�-C it V...of..I.r—d: l..l..�..:J...21.'ni n.g..Ci Vde
Sub�Subd-i-vi-si-o-ns_..._Al-I _application.s- ..for- and -min-or
.subdi..�..�stons...._1ocated....:'.thin..shop-,eland..._management-----di-s-tn-ct.s._...s-ha-1.....be s.0
---.- .bjec------to;....-in
add 3.f._t.h i►.S,-S ec-t`1-o n,;-a1J----apphea i"-mv-ts-i{or_s---of-trhi-s--C-o a-n-d
sha1.I._.be-adm1-rus e:ne; _..teas---desenved lit t is._Code
otifcatIo of..the Comm-issioner- fatu-a - esou-rces:
Variances. A copy of any request for a variance to the provisions of this Section or
plats which propose any lots which require variances to the lot area and dimensional
requirements of this Section or the notice of a public hearing to consider a
conditional use permit or planned unit development permit shall be sent to the
Commissioner of Natural Resources such that notice shall be received by the
commissioner at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing or action on the request.
Subd. 2
Amendments. A copy of all amendments to this Section and final decisions granting
variances or conditional uses within the shoreland management districts shall be sent
Section t330—Shoreland Regulations
Adopted:November 13,2006
Page I2 of I3
Citv of Arden Hills Chapter 13 Zoning Code
to the Commissioner of Natural Resources within ten (10) days of the amendment or
final action.
Subd.3.
Plats. Copies of all plats within the shoreland management districts shall be submitted
to the Commissioner of Natural Resources within ten (10) days of final approval by
the city.
Section 1330-Shoreland Regulations
Adopted: November 13,2006
Page 13 of 1398-8
Attachment C
February 3, 20 10, Draft Planning
Commission Minutes
--AVEN HILLS
crry f Arden Hills
City Council Work Session for February 16, 2010
A. Planning Case 09-003; Zoning Code Amendment Regarding Shoreland
Regulations; City of Arden Hills—Public Hearing
City Planner Beekman reported that the proposed amendments impact three
sections of the Zoning Code. She then provided background information and
stated the purpose of this update is to clarify the regulations, introduce a
reasonable amount of flexibility for unique situations, and enhance the City
ability to enforce the regulations. She reviewed the existing regulations and the
proposed amendments in Sections 1305.04, 1330, and 1325.07 and stated Staff is
recommending the following two revisions:
1. Section 1330.031 Subd. 1 — Note should refer to Section 1330.03, Subd. 4,
rather than Subd. 5.
2. Section 1330.031 Subd. 4 — the words "or more'' should be removed from the
first sentence.
Chair Larson opened the floor to Commission questions.
Commissioner Holewa asked for clarification on the Section 1330.03, Subd. 4.
City Planner Beekman explained that a new home construction or new addition
would need to meet the average setback of the two adjacent homes minus ten feet.
This is to protect the sight lines of the properties.
Commissioner Holewa asked if other cities have this type of language in their
codes.
City Planner Beekman stated that other cities do have similar language. The
language being presented is modified from the..Shoreview regulations and the
"minus ten feet" language was used in that City's ordinance.
Commissioner Modesette asked if the"minus ten feet" was a common distance in
other cities.
City Planner Beekman stated she did not find any cities that used a greater
distance than ten feet. She clarified that the intent of this regulation is to create a
minimum setback and that homes could always be constructed with a greater
setback to the shoreline.
Commissioner Holewa clarified if three houses were twenty feet from the lake
and the middle home was reconstructed, it would have to meet the fifty foot
setback amount versus the twenty feet it was previously at.
City Planner Beekman explained that State Statutes regarding non-conforming
structures would apply and this states that the home could be unproved, replaced,
or repaired but it could not be expanded in any way. The home could be rebuilt at
twenty feet from the lake if they used the exact same footprint of the original
house. If the homeowner wanted a larger home then they would need to meet the
fifty foot setback.
Commissioner Thompson asked for clarification regarding the removal of
vegetation.
City Planner Beekman explained that trimming of vegetation was permitted but
clear cutting was not. If the soil is exposed then erosion control measures would
need to be taken as long as the soil is exposed. This is further explained in
Chapter 15 of the City Code regarding grading and erosion.
Commissioner Holewa asked if this planning case were approved if it would go to
the City Council for approval_
City Planner Beekman explained due to the complexity of the planning case the
City Council will be reviewing it at a work session before approving it. If a
recommendation is made by the Planning Commission the City Council will
review the planning case at their February 16 work session and depending on this
meeting could go to the City Council for a vote at their February 22, 2010,
meeting.
Chair Larson opened the public hearing at 7:12 p.m.
Chair Larson invited anyone for or against the application to come forward and
make comment.
Mr. Mark Johnson, 3124 Hamline Avenue N, Arden Hills, expressed concerns
about the setback towards the lake. He stated that the language including the
"minus ten feet" allowed homes to move closer to the lake. This would have an
adverse effect on other property owners and their sight lines.
Mr. Steve Nelson, 3475 Siems Court, Arden Hills, stated concerns that the front
and side setbacks are not being addressed by the regulations. He also stated that
grade changes that are created by bringing in additional fill are not addressed by
the regulations.
Ms. Ann Stanton, trustee to the property at 1569 Edgewater Avenue, stated she
supports the setbacks but does not agree with the "minus ten feet" language. This
would reduce the setbacks even more. She stated that this amendment would
adversely affect the lakeshore owners. She clarified that she supports the initial
efforts that the City made in closing a loophole for new homes and additions.
Changing the code will change the setback.
Michael Mergens, Larkin Hoffman, representing Mr. and Mrs. Bauer at 1563
Edgewater, presented the Commission with a visual that illustrated the"creeping"
of homes toward the fifty foot setback using the"minus ten feet" language that is
currently being proposed in the regulations. He stated. the City could have
flexibility with the other setbacks but should remove this language from the
shoreline setback.
Angela Hames, 1839 Venus Avenue, Arden Hills, stated she is supportive of the
language being proposed. This would not have a negative impact on the property
value of neighboring homes as has been presented. New home buyers would see
it as a positive that they could build closer to the lake by utilizing the setbacks of
the adjacent properties.
She also agrees that the same standards should be applied to new constructions
and additions. She further clarified that any "creeping" that would take effect
would not happen overnight, but over several decades.
Chris Stanton, Arden Hills, stated every neighborhood has its own character and
the character of the neighborhood on Edgewater Avenue is one with large
backyards and no fences. If homes were allowed to move toward the lake this
would reduce the backyard size and also the sight lines that are enjoyed by the
residents of this neighborhood.
Mary Ellen Stanton, Arden Hills, stated if one home moves closer to the lake this
would affect the views of the entire neighborhood on Edgewater Avenue.
Chair Larson closed the public hearing at 7:40 p.m.
Commissioner Holewa asked City Planner Beekman if it were possible for homes
to ``creep'' closer to the lake over time.
City Planner Beekman stated this was a possibility.
Commissioner Zimmerman stated he would support the regulations but he does
not support the "minus ten feet" language. He clarified by stating the language
was not necessary.
Commissioner Modesette stated she would support the"minus ten foot" language.
This provides the City with greater flexibility to new home constructions within
existing neighborhoods.
Commissioner Reiff stated he would agree with Commissioner Modesette. He
stated the City should not be too restrictive and even without the"minus ten foot"
language the effect of homes "creeping"toward the lake will happen.
Chair Larson pointed out that the only portion of the proposed regulations is the
"minus ten feet" in Section 1 330.03, Subd. 4. He asked if the City Council would
be having a public hearing regarding this planning case.
City Planner Beekman stated that this was the public hearing and the City Council
would not be having another one.
Commissioner Holewa pointed out that during the discussions on the
Comprehensive Plan it was noted that Arden Hills is an aging community. As
people get older they have less money and may not be able to rebuild their homes
closer to the lake as the homes surrounding them do. He stated this would not be
fair to the homeowner who did not have the resources to build closer to the lake.
Chair Larson stated that the regulations are being reviewed and updated in order
to clarify points.
Commissioner Modesette pointed out that no matter what the regulations will not
satisfy everyone.
Commissioner Zimmerman moved seconded bv Commissioner Holewa to
recommend approval of Planning Case 09-003 to amend Sections 1305.04
1325.07 and 1330 of the Zonine Code re ardin the Ci 's Shoreland
Re ulations as presented in the February 3 2010 Planninp,Case Report with
the revisions recommended by Staff and the removal of the phrase "minus 10
feet" in Section 1330.03,Subd.4, at the end of the first sentence.
Commissioner Holewa moved to add language that the auxiliary structure
can not be used to store water crafts and it can not be wider than ten feet as
viewed from the lake. The motion failed due to lack of a second.
The original motion was called to a vote.
The motion failed
Ayes—Commissioners Holewa, Zimmerman,Thompson
Mays—Chair Larson, Commissioners Reiff, Modesette
Commissioner Reiff moved seconded bv Commissioner Modesette to
recommend approval of Planning Case 09-003 to amend Sections 1305.04,
1325.07 and 1330 of the Zonint. Code regarding the City's Shoreland
Re ulations as presented in the February 3 2010 Plannin,g Case Report with
the revisions recommended by Staff.
Commissioner Holewa stated the motion is out of order because it is the same as
the motion that was just voted on.
Chair Larson ruled that the motion was different and could be voted on by the
Planning Commission.
The motion was called to a vote.
The motion failed
Ayes — Chair Larson, Commissioners Reiff, Modesette
Nays—Commissioners Holewa,Zimmerman,Thompson
The Planning Case will move forward with no recommendation. This Planning
Case will be reviewed at the Tuesday, February 16, 2010, City Council work
session before it is brought to the City Council for a final vote, which may occur
at the Monday, February 22, 2010, regular City Council meeting.
Attachment
Public ommen
s
,A EN HILLS
City of Arden Hills
City Council Work Session for February 16, 2010
Ms. Meagan Beekman, Planner
City of Arden Hills
1245 Highway 96 West - - -- ----�---
i s, Minnesota 55112 ` ---
t
r
It
I understand that the Planning Commission of the City or Arden Hills is considering an
amendment of the-Zoning Code (proposed Section 1330.03 Subd. 4) that would change the
minimum requirement for shoreline setbacks for adjacent lots.
i oppos h amendme a ause it wo red cc the av tback b ee a
pr erties.
I am a resident of the City of Arden Hills living at:
-W-I
,r f
X
Signature Date
Ai
L a n
Ho ' an Larkin Hoffman Daly&Lindgren Ltd.
MATT
1500 Wells Fargo Plaza
7900 Xerxes Avenue South
Minneapolis,Minnesota 55431-1194
GENERAL_ 952-835-3800
FAX: 952-896-3333
WEB- www.larkinhoffman.com
February 2, 2010
Ms. Meagan Beekman, Planner Via Email
City of Arden Hills
1245 Highway 96 West
Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112
Re: Proposed Amendment to the City of Arden Hills' zoning Code Section 1330.03, subd.
6(B) (the"Adjacent Lot Setback Rule")
Dear Ms. Beekman:
We represent the.family of Mrs. Elizabeth Stanton(the "Stantons"), 1569 Edgewater Avenue, in --
connection with the City of Arden Hills's("City") proposed amendment to the Adjacent Lot
Setback Rule. While the Stantons are generally supportive of efforts to close potential loopholes
in the Adjacent Lot Setback Rule, they object to two phrases of the recently proposed language
as unnecessary and against public interest. Specifically, the Stantons object to the recent changes
in the definition of adjacent dwellings to include "two or more" dwellings and the language that
would allow new dwellings or additions to be built 10 feet closer to the lakeshore than-existing
adjacent dwellings. Other than the phrases "or more" and"minus ten (10) feet," the Stantons
support the proposed amendment.
Adjacent Lot Setback Rule and Evolution of Proposed Amendment
As it sits today, the Adjacent Lot Setback Rule states:
Adjacent Lots. On undeveloped shoreland lots that have two (2)
adjacent lots with existing principal structures on both such
adjacent lots, any new residential structure may be set back the
average setback of the adjacent structures from the ordinary high
water mark or fifty(50) feet, whichever is greater, provided all
other provisions of the shoreland management districts are
complied with.
Since at least May 2009, the City has been considering an amendment to the Adjacent Lot
Setback Rule as part of a broader update of shoreland regulations. As the matter has come
before the Planning Commission on July 8, 2009,November 4, 2009, and February 4, 2010, the
stated purpose of the review was to alleviate "a number of holes and unaddressed issues
remaining" in the shoreland regulations following a 2002 update.
In November 20091, City Staff prepared relatively minor, but important, proposed changes to the
Adjacent Lot Setback Rule as follows:
Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112
February 2, 2010
Page 2
Adjacent Lots. On shoreland lots that have two (2) adjacent lots
with existing principal structures on both sides, any new residential
structure shah be set back the average setback of the adjacent
structures from the ordinary high water level or the structure
setback for the lake, whichever is greater, provided all other
provisions of the Shoreland Management Districts are complied
with. The Provision may be modified by the City's Zoning
Administrator for unique topographical features.
The minutes of the November 41 2009 Public Hearing show that, other than question of what fell
within the term"structure," there was little discussion or opposition to the proposed changes to
the Adjacent Lot Setback Rule. Specifically, there was no request to allow new dwellings to be
built closer to the shoreline than the two adjacent homes, or to base the average setback on more
than the two adjacent dwellings, which appears to have traditionally been calculated using the
"string line" approach.
Despite the lack of opposition to maintaining the shoreland setback based on a string line
approach of the two adjacent home, the new proposal, issued just last week, is to dramatically
amend the Adjacent Lots Setback Rule to read as follows:
Subd. 4 Adjacent Lots. Where two or more existing adjacent
dwellings have shoreline setbacks that exceed the minimum
setback from the ordinary high water level by ten (10) or more
feet, the shoreland setback for a new dwelling unit, or an addition
to a dwelling, shall not be less than the average of the shoreland
setbacks for such existing adjacent dwellings minus ten (10) feet.
However, in no case shall the new structure or addition be within
the minimum setback from the ordinary high water level as stated
in Section 1330.03 Subd 1.
Addition of the Phrase "Two Or More" and "Minus Ten (10) Feet" Are Neither Necessary
Nor in the Public Interest.
According to the City's Procedural Manual, the required submissions for a zoning code
amendment includes a statement as to why the proposed amendment is "necessary and in the
public interest." Given the significant changes that are being proposed for the Adjacent Lots
Setback Rule, the proposed changes should meet this same standard to demonstrate it is not
arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable. See, e.g., In re Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross &
Blue Shield of Minn., 624 N.W.2d 264, 277(Minn. 2001) (appellate court may reverse an
administrative decision if it is not supported by substantial evidence or is arbitrary and
capricious); Horbal v. City of Ham Lake, 393 N.W.2d 5, 7 (Minn. App. 1986) (holding courts
determine whether the zoning action was "reasonable and not arbitrary or capricious in light of
applicable zoning ordinances"). As discussed below, the language the Stantons are objecting to
does not meet this standard.
Arden mills, Minnesota 55112
February 2, 2010
Page 3
a. Inclusion of"Two or More" Creates Ambiguity.
For reasons that are unclear, the current proposal to amend the Adjacent Lots Setback Rule
would provide that it applies if"two or more existing adjacent dwellings have shoreline setbacks
that exceed the minimum setback from the ordinary g Y ten high water level b (10) or more feet."
Under the relevant dictionary definition, "adjacent" means " having a common endpoint or
border<adjacent lots><adjacent sides of a triangle>" www.merriam-
webster.com/dictionary/ad acent(last visited February 1, 2010). On a linear plane, such lots
along a shoreline, a lot can have only two other lots that have lake frontage and share common
boundaries. Therefore, applying the accepted dictionary definition of adjacent, there cannot be
more than two adjacent dwellings.
But if the common dictionary meaning is not going to be used, which will happen if the "or
more" language is adopted, it will create a question of what is the meaning of"adjacent." If
"adjacent dwellings" is not properties with common borders, then what is the limit? Adopting
such language will simply create many more questions than it answers.. For example, would a
dwelling three lots away from an applicant's lot be considered an adjacent dwelling for purpose
of Rule? Further, if more than 2 dwellings are used, how is the average measured? If it the City
intends to continue use of the string line test, how is that accomplished with more than two
dwellings?
Where can be perhaps no better demonstration of the problems adding"or more" creates then the
recent variance request for 1563 Edgewater Avenue. In their application, the new owners of Lot
14 requested the average shoreland setback be determined by using a string line from what was
described as Lot 13 and Lot 161 conveniently leaving Lot 15 out of the string line average. Lot
16 is an anomaly from what is an otherwise consistent neighborhood setback of approximately
100 feet. Using a string line average from Lot 16 to Lot 13 would result in an substantially
different"average" setback than a string line average between Lot 15 and Lot 131, or the median
average of all dwelling setbacks in the neighborhood. In fact, allowing what most would
consider the non-adjacent Lot 16 to be used to calculate the average setback of Lot 14 could,
depending on the method, provide Lot 14 with a substantially different setback standard than
nearly any other property along Lake Johanna; arguably creating a spot zoning effect.
Given the uncertainties "or more" creates, a court would have little difficulty declaring the
language to be ambiguous. As a matter of law, any ambiguity in the Zoning Code would be
construed against the City. See Amcon Corp. v. City of Eagan, 348 N.W.2d 66 (Minn., 1984).
Amending a clear section of the Adjacent Lot Setback Rule in a manner that creates ambiguity is
neither necessary nor in the public interest.
i In discussingthe proposed changes the Adjacent Lots Setback Rule the February 3 2010
p p g J � Y
Memorandum to the Planning Commission states, "Staff is proposing an amendment to the
regulations that addresses construction on lots with two adjacent developed lots."
(Emphasis added). Further, the Stantons were unable to locate any Planning Commission
Meeting Minutes that contain a discussion that there should, or could, be more than two
adjacent homes for purposes of determining the shoreland setback average.
Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112
February 2, 2010
Page 4
b. History Does Not Suggest That The "Minus Ten (10) Feet" Language Is
Necessary to Allow a Proper Use of Lake Front Lots.
For the lots along Edgewater Avenue that front on Lake Johanna(the "Edgewater
Neighborhood"), the existing Adjacent Lot Setback Rule has resulted in a nearly uniform
shoreland setback of approximately 100 feet.2 As new homes have been built in the Edgewater
Y
Neighborhood, the owners have honored the Zoning Code and maintained a consistent shoreland
setback of approximately 100 feet. What this shows is the lack of a general need to allow new
dwellings or additions to move 10 feet closer to the shoreline.
On the other hand, if the "minus ten(10) feet" language is directed at a particular project or
projects rather a general need, then the proposed amendment would fall with the purview of the
Minnesota Environmental Policy Act("MEPA"), or may run afoul of the prohibition on spot
zoning. p. See Minn. R. 4410.4600, subp. 26.3 At this point, it is unclear from the record what the
driving force behind the "minus ten(10) feet" language is since it was unveiled mere days ago
and there has been no public discussion of the language.. But if the action is not exempted from
MEPA, it may call for environmental review because a reduction in shoreland setbacks for
structures will reduce the shore impact zone, which is defined as the"land located between the
ordinary high water level of a public water and a line parallel to it at a setback of 50 percent of
the structure setback." Minn. R. 6120.2500, subp. 14c. In certain cases, impacts to shore
impact zones require mandatory environmental assessment worksheet. Minn. R. 44 10.10001
subp. 2 and 4410.4300, subp. 36a. Of course, more information would be needed before any
determination could be made whether the proposed amendment comes within the purview of
MEPA or whether any form of environmental review is required or appropriate; however, it is an
issue that needs to be flushed out given the lack of available information on the inclusion of the
"minus ten (10) feet" language.
C. Allowing New Dwellings or Additions to Existing Dwellings to Reduce the
Shoreland Setback, And Consequently the Shore Impact Zone, Is Not in the
Public Interest.
When the City began the process of potentially amending the Adjacent Lot Setback Rule, the
purpose was to eliminate what the City considered a loophole because the Rule referred to
"undeveloped shoreland lots." To the extent that such a loophole does exist, the public interest is
served by closing that loophole.4 But the same cannot be said for the recent addition of the
2 The lone anomaly a single in le home that was first constructed in the 19 5)Os.
g
3 Rule 4410.4600 provides government action that is exempt from the scope of the term
p g p p
"project" including exempting zoning amendments "unless the action would be primarily for
the benefit of a specific project or projects."
4 If the existingstructure is non-conforming Zoning Code Section 1350.04 would apply. It
g
states, "Nonconforming buildings shall not be increased, enlarged, altered, intensified or
extended to occupy a greater area or height on the lot on which the building is located, or
moved to any other part of the lot on which the building is located in a way that augments its
Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112
February 2, 2010
Wage 5
"minus ten(10) feet" language allowin new dwellings or additions to move 10 feet closer to the
g
shoreline than the adjacent dwellings.
Based on the Ad'lain language of the Adjacent Lots Setback Rule, it is designed to assure that sight
pJ
lines of lake and shoreline from existing homes are maintained. It cannot be forgotten that
lakeshore homes are generally designed to maximize lake views, are built with the expectation
that other builders will likewise be held to the same standard, and have a value that is
inextricably tied to lake views. The public interest is best served by maintaining these
investment-backed expectations.
In addition, having a hard setback line is the only way to maintain the character of existing
neighborhoods that have substantial green space between dwellings and shoreland. Significant
and consistent
ace green s provides for a more aesthetically pleasing views, both looking in from
g p
the lake and outward from shore, plus the potential for enhanced public safety. The increased
green space can also lead to improved water quality of City lakes by limiting the amount of
imperious surfaces and by having greater pervious areas between dwellings and lake shore to
absorb and filter runoff. ---
In contrast, if the concern driving the "minus ten(10) feet" language is unique topographical
features of a particular lot that need a shorter setback, such concerns are properly addressed by
seeking a variance. In the variance procedure, the City has the opportunity to review the
specifics of anyp articular case to determine whether there are topographical features that justify
p
moving closer to the shoreline while assuring any such change is done in a manner that maintains
the character of the neighborhood and the spirit of the Zoning Code. The same simply cannot be
said for a blanket amendment of"minus ten(10) feet" for any new construction, which will
foster a race to the 50-foot setback mark.
Conclusion
Rather than create new questions and new issues, the City needs to stay focused on what is
necessary an n d i the public interest. For the Adjacent Lots Setback Rule, that means adopting an
amendment that fix the potential"addition loophole" while preserving the character of existing
lakeshore neighborhoods and the expectations of those that have invested their hard earned
dollars to construct homes, in reliance on the Zoning Code, that maximize lake views. To
accomplish those goals, the Stantons recommend the following deletions (strikethrough) in the
proposed amendment to the Adjacent Lots Setback Rule should be as follows:
Subd. 4 Adjacent Lots. Where two or-mere existing adjacent
dwellings have shoreline setbacks that exceed the minimum
setback from the ordinary high water level fnefe
the shoreland setback for a new dwelling unit, or an addition
nonconformity." Based on the basic grammar, an addition cannot be added to a
nonconforming structure since it would undeniably cause the dwelling to occupy a greater
area or height on the lot.
Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112
February 2, 2010
Page 6
to a dwelling, shad not be less than the average of the shoreland
setbacks for such existing adjacent dwellings min 1"Q}Qn 0J.0) fe'.
However, in no case shall the new structure or addition be within
the minimum setback from the ordinary high water level as stated --
in Section 1330.03 Subd 1.
Sincerely
Michael Mergens, f
Larkin Hoffman Daly & Lindgren Ltd.
Direct Dial: (952)896-3297
Direct Fax: (952)842-1743
Email: m.mer ens c�,.larkinhoff .an.com.
1291342.1
Larkien
oilman
Larkin Hoffman Daly&Lindgren Ltd.
ATTORNEYS
1500 Wells Fargo Plaza
7900 Xerxes Avenue south
Minneapolis,Minnesota 55431-1194
GENERA!: 952-835-3800
FAX: 952-896-3333
WEB: www.larkinhoffinan.com
February 11,2010
Arden Hills City Council Via Email
c/o Meagan Beekman, City Planner
1245 Highway 96 West
Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112
Re: Proposed Amendment to the City of Arden Hills' Adjacent Lot Setback Rule
Dear Mayor Harpstead and Councilmembers:
We represent the family of Mrs. Elizabeth Stanton(the"Stantons"), 1569 Edgewater Avenue,in
connection with the City of Arden Hills's ("City")proposed amendment to the Adjacent Lot
Setback Rule("Rule"). The Stantons are generally supportive of efforts to close potential
loopholes in the Rule. But they, like many other residents of the City, object to the recently
proposed"minus ten(10)feet"language I that would allow new homes or additions to be built 10
feet closer to the lakeshore than existing adjacent homes, effectively violating the setback.2
So there is no question,the Stantons are not here to stand in the way of development. Indeed,the
evidence shows that many lakeshore lots are being redeveloped consistent with the present Rule.
Like so many of their neighbors,the Stantons take issue with language that, while unnecessary
for redevelopment,will have significant negative impacts on existing homeowners and overall
lake quality.
1 In advance of the February3 2010 Planning Commission Hearin (the"Public Hearin "� g g Hearin""),
the undersigned counsel submitted a February 2, 2010 letter containing an objection to
language defining adjacent properties to include"two or more"properties. The"or more"
language was editorially deleted from the proposed amendment by City staff prior to the
Public Hearing and was,therefore, not a point of discussion. The Stantons assume that"or
more"is no longer before the Council with the proposed amendment. But if it is going to be
considered,we refer the Council to the discussion in my earlier letter demonstrating its
impropriety and our stated objections.
2 The"minus ten(10)feet"lan a e was the oint of considerable debate at the Public
� g p
Hearing, including my February 2, 2010 letter. The objections raised in that letter remain
and I would refer the Council to that letter for additional discussion. The point of this letter
is to provide additional information to assist the City Council in reaching a proper decision.
Arden Dills City Council
February 11, 2010
Page 2
a. There Is No Evidence of a Need for the"minus ten (10) foot"Language.
Because the Adjacent Lots Setback Rule presently refers to "undeveloped shoreland lots"the
City was concerned that the Rule, as written,contains a loophole that would allow additions to
existing homes to be built closer to the lakeshore than new homes. Closing this loophole and
clarifying what"structures"must meet the setback requirement were the stated reasons to amend
the Rule. The"minus ten(10)feet"language is wholly unrelated to, and unnecessary to
accomplishing these goals. The potential loophole can quite easily be closed with amendments
to existing language as follows(idelti and additions)and definitional clarifications of
"dwelling":
Adjacent Lots. On shoreland lots that have two (2)
adjacent lots with existing* ' -es dwellings on both
such ad j acent lots, any new residential stf u etur-e dwelling unit,or
an addition to an existing dwelling,may shall be setback at least
the average setback of the adjacent stmetw e dwellings from the
ordinary high water mark or fifty(50)feet,whichever is greater, ----
provided all other provisions of the shoreland management districts
are complied with.
The only apparent basis for including the "minus ten(10) feet"language is a perceived need to
have flexibility to allow development to occur. A review of the evidence,however, quickly
dispels this perceived need. There is no evidence in the public record evidencing a need or
request to allow new homes or additions to move 10 feet closer to the lakeshore than the adjacent
homes. The language was not introduced to the public until mere days before the Public Dearing
and at a time when many lakeshore owners were not home to receive notice of the change or to
submit comments. Yet, even under those circumstances,the vast majority of public response has
been to oppose the"minus ten(10) foot"language.
More importantly,there is no evidence to support a conclusion that such language is necessary to
allow redevelopment of lakeshore property with new,modern homes. In fact,the opposite is
true. Redevelopment of existing lots with new, large,modern homes has occurred without the
need to move 10 feet closer. For example,in the Edgewater Avenue area of Lake Johanna,
homes have recently been built at 1505 Edgewater Avenue(1999) and 153 5 Edgewater Avenue
(1997)that maintained the adjacent lot setback of approximately 100 feet . Attached hereto are
PID Reports for both homes showing basic characteristics of the homes and their assessed
values. Further,I have conducted a preliminary plat search of other areas of Lake Johanna.
Even this cursory search revealed that significant redevelopment with large home has occurred
under the existing Adjacent Lot Setback Rule. I have attached hereto PID Reports for some of
the new homes (post 1990)that have been built on Lake Johanna. while this is not a complete or
thorough analysis of lakeshore development in the City, it is undeniable evidence that new
homes can be, and have been,built without the need to move 10 feet closer to the Lakeshore.
Arden Hills City Council
February 11,2010
Page 3
b. The"Minus Ten (10)foot"Language Is Not in the Public Interest.
On the other end of the scale is the negative effects to existing homeowners and lake quality that
will result from allowing new home after new home to creep 10 feet closer to the minimum 5 0-
foot setback,3
Lakeshore homeowners position their homes and design layouts to achieve the best sightlines
and lake views This includes numerous recent new homes whose owners have expended
significant resources to construct homes consistent with neighboring lakeshore setbacks. The
plain purpose of the Adjacent Lots Setback Rule is to assure that existing lakeshore owners who
have invested their hard earned dollars to maximize their lake view will not have those views
blocked every time a neighboring lot is redeveloped. But if the Rule is amended to allow the 10-
foot creep towards the shoreline, existing homeowners who wish to maintain their open
sightlines and wide lake views would be left with only one option: move closer to the lake and
hope that their neighbors do not in turn move even closer. Of course,many lakeshore residents
do not have the desire or financial wherewithal to redevelop or expand their homes. And even if
there were unlimited resources to continually remodel or replace existing homes,it simply is not ---
good public policy to force existing homeowners to continually expend significant amounts of
money just to maintain what they have today.
Finally,the Stantons would like to address a suggestion that the"minus ten(10) feet"language
will increase property value as suggested by a real estate agent during the Public Hearing. In my
practice,I focus considerable time on real estate valuation and I do not agree with the overly
broad claim that property values are generally based on redevelopment potential. Assessed
values are generally determined based on the value of the existing improvements and the value
of the land with those improvements in place. It is hard to imagine how the value of an existing
home is not reduced when what had once been a view of green space and lakeshore is now
completely blocked by a neighboring home. Further,as a matter of basic appraisal techniques,
the only time that the"redevelopment"approach to valuation would be proper is when the value
of the land for redevelopment exceeds the value of the land and existing improvements.
Certainly for those property owners who have invested in excess of$500,000 on a new home,the
market value of their property does not derive from its potential to be redeveloped 10 feet closer
to the lakeshore. Of course,the redevelopment value of any lot presupposes that the owner
wishes to sell or remodel.
In addition,the real estate agent's theory assumes that the greatest factor in setting the value of
any lakeshore lot for redevelopment is how close proposed redevelopment can occur to the
shoreline. Again, I disagree with such a blanket statement. While there may be some who will
focus on shoreland setbacks,there are many more who will pay a premium price based on lake
frontage,lake quality and the aesthetic environment of the neighborhood. That premium price
across an entire neighborhood will be destroyed if new homes are allowed to creep even closer to
3 In the Edgewater Avenue area of Lake Johanna,that means the standard setback of
approximately 100 feet,honored by every home in the neighborhood except one,could
quickly be reduced to the 50 foot minimum.
Arden Hills City Council
February 11,2010
Page 4
the shoreline. Even for those persons who are focused on shoreland setbacks,certainty and
uniformity are likely to be just as important. Specifically,owners savvy enough to research
shoreland setback requirements will also understand that the "minus ten(10)foot"language
e ---
�
creates the very real possibility that after they spend significant sums building a home
maximizing sightlines and lake views,they will face the very real potential that ad j acent lots will
be redeveloped even closer to the lakeshore thereby blocking the views that their home was
designed to capture.
If the Rule is going to be amended,it should be done to benefit the shoreland owners in general
and not simply to respond to an unexpressed and factually incorrect need for flexibility. But
even accepting the theory that a single lot value increased because a new home could be built
closer to the lake than the neighboring homes,that increase in value would be achieved to the
detriment of the adjacent homes who would lose the sightlines and lake views their homes were
designed to capture. Further, as demonstrated by the level of objection to the"minus ten(10)
foot"language, for many the premium value lies not in the closeness to the lake shore,but in the
overall aesthetic environment of the neighborhood around the lake. Allowing a neighborhood _
character, cherished by present City residents,to be destroyed in the name of speculative benefits
to a few unidentified potential owners is not good public policy and is not in the City's public
interest.
Conclusion
Although the Stantons are in favor of closing potential loopholes in the Zoning Code,the
Stantons believe the focus for any amendment to the Adjacent Lot Setback Rule should be to
close that loophole and not include unnecessary language that is contrary to the public interest.
Sincerely, �.
Michael erge s r
Larkin Hoffm Daly&Lindgren Ltd.
Direct Dial: (952)896-3297
Direct Fax: (952)842-1743
Email: mmer2ens@larkinhoffinan.com '
cc: Ann Stanton
Mary Ellen Stanton
.Peter J. Coyle,Esq.
1292495.1
Page 1 of 1
Copyright 2/10/2010 by Plat System Services
PID Report
TAX
PID # 343023330052 1505 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills MN 55112-3602 Ramsey Count
9 Y 'Y
Owner: Land Taxable Market Value: $523,700
Elvira D Sheehy Building Taxable Market Value: $600,000
Taxpayer: Total Taxable Market Value.• $1,123,700
Eivira D Sheehy
Tax Billing Address: Total Estimated Market Value: $1,1231700
1505 Edgewater Ave
Arden Hills MN 55112-3602
Postal City:Arden Hills Base Tax: $14,596
Payable Tax Year: 2009
Assessment Amount: $32
Tax w/Assessment: $14,628
Homestead: Yes Sec: 34
Homestead Status Desc: Full homestead Twp: 030
School District: Mounds View Range: 23
Year Built: 1999 QQ: 33
Torrens/Abstract:
Lot: 007
Acres: 1.38 Block: 008
Lot Front: 130.00 Subdivision: ARDEN HILLS NO. 3
Lot Depth: 462.00
Lot Size: 462X130 Property Type: Residential
Legal Description:ARDEN HILLS NO. 3 LOT 7 &8 BLK 8
CHARACTERISTICS
PID# 343023330052
Bldg Number: 1 Building Style: 1 Story Total Rooms: 11
Building Use: Single Family Residence Living Rooms:
Ground Floor Area: Stories: 1.00 Bedrooms: 4
Second Floor Area: Family Rooms: 1
Total Building Area: Roof Type: Kitchens:
Finished Square Footage: 5,777 sq ft Roof Cover: Bath -Full, 3/4, 1/2 4.00
Foundation Size: Construction Type: Fireplaces: 2
Other Rooms:
Basement Area: Exterior Wall:Wood
Basement Finished: 2500 Interior Wall: Units:
Flooring Type: Units 1 Bedroom:
Garage Type:Attached Units 2 Bedroom:
Garage Area: 1,228 sq ft Air Conditioning: Units 3 Bedroom:
Garage Stalls: Fuel Type:Gas Units Efficiency:
Parking Spaces: Heating System: Forced Air -
This information has been supplied by third parties, and where possible, verified by Plat System Services to be accurate. We do
not howeverguarantee accuracy for all the information supplied.
http://www.platresearch.com/REsearch/Base/Lib/ActionMenuPrintModal.htm 2/10/2010
Page 1 of 1
Copyright 2/10/2010 by Plat System Services
PID Report
TAX
PID # 343023330010 1535 Edgewater Ave Arden Hills MN - Ramsey Count
9 , 551i2 3602 Y Y
Owner: Land Taxable Market Value: 279,900
Fred A Sutter Building Taxable Market Value: $570,800
Anne M Sutter Total Taxable Market Value: $850,700
Taxpayer:
Fred A Sutter
Anne M Sutter Total Estimated Market Value: $850,700
Tax Billing Address:
1535 Edgewater Ave Base Tax: $10,754
Arden Hills MN 55112-3602 Payable Tax Year: 2009
Postal City: Arden Hills Assessment Amount: $32
Tax w/Assessment: $10,786
Homestead: Yes Sec: 34
Homestead Status Desc: Full homestead Twp: 030
School District: Mounds View Range: 23
Year Built: 1997 QQ: 33
Torrens/Abstract:
Lot: 010 ---
Acres: 0.42 Block: 008
Lot Front: 63.00 Subdivision: ARDEN HILLS NO. 3
Lot Depth: 287.00
Lot Size: 287X63 Property Type: Residential
SALES
Purch Agr Date Signer Date Filing Date Deed Type Purchase Price CREV# CREV ID
7/15/1997 7/15/1997 7/15/1997 other $200,000 245535 775208
FRED A SUTTER
ANNE M SUTTER
Legal Description:ARDEN HILLS NO. 3 LOT 10 BLK 8
CHARACTERISTICS
PID#343023330010
Bldg Number: 1 Building Style: 2 Story Total Rooms: 7
Building Use: Single Family Residence Living Rooms:
Ground Floor Area: Stories: 2.00 Bedrooms: 3
Second Floor Area: Family Rooms: 1
Total Building Area: Roof Type: Kitchens:
Finished Square Footage: 3,936 sq ft Roof Corner: Bath-Full,3/4, 1/2 3.00
Foundation Size: Construction Type: Fireplaces: 3
Other Rooms:
Basement Area: Exterior Wall: Wood
Basement Finished: 800 Interior Wall: Units:
Flooring Type: Units 1 Bedroom: --
Garage Type:Attached Units 2 Bedroom:
Garage Area: 864 sq ft Air Conditioning: Units 3 Bedroom:
Garage Stalls: Fuel Type: Gas Units Efficiency:
Parking Spaces: Heating System: Forced Air
This information has been supplied by third parties,and where possible,verified by Plat System Services to be accurate. We do
not however,guarantee accuracy for all the information supplied.
hq://vwvw.platresearch.com/REsearch/Base/Lib/ActionMenuPrintModal.htm 2/ p
l /2a1Q
Page 1 of 1
Copyright 2/10/201.0 by Plat System Services
PID Report
TALC
PID # 343023230030 3421 SnellingAve N Arden Hilts MN 5 11 - Ramsey Count
, 5 2 3674 Y Y
Owner: Land Taxable Market Value: $325,200
Jeffrey J Fog Building Taxable Market Value: $565,300
Barbara K Fog Total Taxable Market'Value: $890500
Taxpayer:
Jeffrey J Fog Total Estimate mate
Barbara K Fog d Market Value: $890,500
Tax Billing Address:
3421 Snelling Ave N Base Tax: $11,314
St. Paul MN 55112-3674 Payable Tax Year: 2009
Postal City:Arden Hills Assessment Amount: $32
Tax w/Assessment: $11,346
Homestead: Yes Sec: 34
Homestead Status Desc: Full homestead Twp: 030
School District: Mounds View Range: 23
Year Built: 1991 QQ: 23 _
Torre ns/Abstract:
Lot: 014
Acres: 0.78 Block: 003
Lot Front: 65.00 Subdivision: ARDEN HILLS,RAMSEY COUNTY, MIN
Lot Depth: 522.00
Lot Size: 522X65 Property Type: Residential
Legal Description:ARDEN HILLS,RAMSEY COUNTY, MIN LOT 14 BLK 3
CHARACTERISTICS
PID # 343023230030
Bldg Number: 1 Building Style: 2 Story Total Rooms: 8
Building Use: Single Family Residence Living Rooms:
Ground Floor Area: Stories: 2.00 Bedrooms: 4
Second Floor Area: Family Rooms: 1
Total Building Area: Roof Type: Kitchens:
Finished Square Footage: 3,492 sq ft Roof Cover: Bath- Full,3/4, 1/2 4.00
Foundation Size: Construction Type: Fireplaces: 1
Other Rooms:
Basement Area: Exterior Wall:Wood
Basement Finished: 400 Interior Wall: Units:
Flooring Type: Units 1 Bedroom:
Garage Type: Detached Units 2 Bedroom:
Garage Area: 590 sq ft Air Conditioning: Units 3 Bedroom:
Garage Stalls: Fuel Type: Gas Units Efficiency:
Parking Spaces: Heating System: Forced Air
This information has been supplied by third parties, and where possible, verified by Plat System Services to be accurate. We do
not, however, guarantee accuracy for all the information supplied.
http://vAwv.platresearch.com/REsearch/Base/Lib/ActionMenuPrintModal.htm 2/10/2010
Page l of 1
Copyright 2/10/2010 by Plat System Services
PID Report
TAX
PID # 343023230029 3427 SnellingAve N Arden Hies MTV 55 12- Ramsey County
, , 1 3600 Y
Owner:
Land Taxable Market Value: $330,100
R David Resch Building Taxable Market Value: $417,200
Laurie] Resch
Total Taxable Market Value: $747,300
Taxpayer:
R David Resch Total Estimated Market Value: 74
Laurie J Resch $ 7,300
Tax Billing Address:
3427 Snelling Ave N Base Tax: $9,298
Arden Hills MN 55112-3600 Payable Tax Year: 2009
Postal City:Arden Hills Assessment Amount: $32
Tax w/Assessment: $9,330
Homestead: Yes Sec: 34
Homestead Status Desc: Full homestead Twp: 030
School District: Mounds View Range: 23
Year Built: 1994 QQ: 23
Torrens/Abstract:
Lot: 013
Acres: 0.83 Block: 003
Lot Front: 65.00 Subdivision: ARDEN HILLS,RAMSEY COUNTY, MIN
Lot Depth: 554.00
Lot Size: 554X65 Property Type: Residential
Legal Description:ARDEN HILLS,RAMSEY COUNTY, MIN LOT 13 BLK 3
CHARACTERISTICS
PID #343023230029
Bldg Number: 1 Building Style: Split Level Total Rooms: 8
Building Use: Single Family Residence Living Rooms:
Ground Floor Area: Stories: 1.00 Bedrooms: 3
Second Floor Area: Family Rooms: 1
Total Building Area: Roof Type: Kitchens:
Finished Square Footage: 2,912 sq ft Roof Cover: Bath -Full, 3/4, 1/2 4.00
Foundation Size: Construction Type: Fireplaces: 1
Other Rooms:
Basement Area: Exterior(Nall: Wood
Basement Finished: 600 Interior Wall: .Units:
Flooring Type: Units 1 Bedroom:
Garage Type:Attached Units 2 Bedroom:
Garage Area: 667 sq ft Air Conditioning: Units 3 Bedroom:
Garage Stalls: Fuel Type: Gas Units Efficiency:
Parking Spaces: Heating System: Forced Air
This information has been supplied by third parties, and where possible, verified by Plat System Services to be accurate. We do
not however, guarantee accuracy for all the information supplied.
http://wvwv.platresearch.com/REsearch/Base/L,ib/ActionMenuPrintModal.htm 2/10/2010
Page 1 of 1
Copyright 2/10/2010 by Plat System Services
PID Report
TAX
PID # 343023240031 3385 SnellingAve N Arden Hills MN 55112-�3685 Ramsey County
, ,
Owner: Land Taxable Market Value: $407,500
Sara 3 Mohn Building Taxable Market Value: $425,600
William E Schultz Total Taxable Market Value: $833,100
Taxpayer:
Sara 3 Mohn Total Estimated Market Value: 833 100
William E Schultz '
Tax Billing Address: Base Tax'
3385 Snelling Ave N $10,506
Arden Hills MN 55112-3685 Payable Tax Year: 2009
Postal City:Arden Hills Assessment Amount: $32
Tax w/Assessment: $10,538
Homestead: Yes Sec: 34
Homestead Status Desc: Full homestead Twp: 030
School District: Mounds View Range: 23
Year Built: 1997 QQ: 24
Torrens/Abstract: ---
Lot:
Acres: 0.91 Block:
Lot Front: 100.00 Subdivision: REGISTERED LAND SURVEY 380
Lot Depth: 396.00
Lot Size: 396X100 Property Type: Residential
SALES
Purch Agr Date Signer Date Filing Date Deed Type Purchase Price CREV## CREV ID
7/1/1997 7/1/1997 7/1/1997 Trustee Deed $216,900 244677 894535
SARA 3 MOHN
Legal Description: REGISTERED LAND SURVEY 380 SUB]TO RD&ESMT; TRACT B
CHARACTERISTICS
PID#343023240031
Bldg Number: 1 Building Style: 2 Story Total Rooms: 9
Building Use: Single Family Residence Living Rooms:
Ground Floor Area: Stories: 2.00 Bedrooms: 3
Second Floor Area: Family Rooms: 1
Total Building Area: Roof Type: Kitchens:
Finished Square Footage: 3,498 sq ft Roof Cover: Bath -Full, 3/4, 1/2 3.00
Foundation Size: Construction Type: Fireplaces: 1
Other Rooms:
Basement Area: Exterior Wall: Wood
Basement Finished: 756 Interior Wall: Units:
Flooring Type: Units I Bedroom:
Garage Type: Attached Units 2 Bedroom:
Garage Area: 616 sq ft Air Conditioning: Units 3 Bedroom:
Garage Stalls: Fuel Type: Gas Units Efficiency:
Parking Spaces: Heating System: Forced Air
This information has been supplied by third parties, and where possible,verified by Plat System Services to be accurate. We do
not however,guarantee accuracy for all the information sypelied.
http://www.platresearch.com/REsearch/Base/Lib/ActionMenuPrintModal.htm 2/10/2010
Page I of 1
Copyright 2/10/2010 by Plat System Services
PID Report
TAX
PID # 333023420001 3356 Lake Johanna Blvd Arden Hills MN 55112-7942Ramsey County
Owner: Land Taxable Market Value: $332,200
Kenneth S Bezdicek Building Taxable Market Value: $659,800
Marie Bezdicek
Total Taxable Market Value: $9921000
Taxpayer:
Kenneth S Bezdicek Total Estimated Market
Marie Bezdicek t Value: $992,000 a
Tax Billing Address: B
3356 Lake Johanna Blvd Base Tax: $12,742
Arden Hills MN 55112-7942 Payable Tax Year: 2009
Postal City: Arden Hills Assessment Amount: $32
Tax w/Assessment: $12,774
Homestead: Yes Sec: 33
Homestead Status Desc: Full homestead Twp: 030
School District: Mounds View Range: 23
Year Built: 2004 QQ: 42
Torrens/Abstract:
Lot: 009
Acres: 0.48 Block:
Lot Front: 83.00 Subdivision: AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 80
Lot Depth: 254.00
Lot Size: 254X83 Property Type: Residential
SALES
Purch Agr Date Signer Date Filing Date Deed Type Purchase Price CREV# CREV ID
8/1/2003 8/1/2003 8/1/2003 Other $430,000 1472119
Kenneth Bezdicek
Marie Bezdicek
Legal Description: AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 80 LOTS 8 AND LOT 9
CHARACTERISTICS
PID#333023420001
Bldg Number: 1 Building Style: Total Rooms: 8
Building Use: Single Family Residence Living Rooms:
Ground Floor Area: Stories: 1.00 Bedrooms: 4
Second Floor Area: Family Rooms: 1
Total Building Area: Roof Type: Kitchens:
Finished Square Footage: 3,694 sq ft Roof Cover: Bath-Full, 3/4, 1/2 4.00
Foundation Size: Construction Type: Fireplaces: 2
Other Rooms:
Basement Area: Exterior Wall: Brick
Basement Finished: Interior Wall: Units:
Flooring Type: Units 1 Bedroom:
Garage Type: Attached Units 2 Bedroom:
Garage Area: 1,324 sq ft Air Conditioning: Units 3 Bedroom:
Garage Stalls: Fuel Type: Gas Units Efficiency:
Parking Spaces: Heating System: Forced Air
This information has been supplied by third parties,and where possible,verified by Plat System Services to be accurate. We do
not however, guarantee accuracy for all the information supplied.
http://vvww.platresearch.conVREsearchBase/Lib/ActionMenuPrintModal.htm 2/10/2010
Page 1 of 2
Copyright 2/10/2010 by Plat System Services
PID Report
TAX
PID # 333023420042 3294 Lake Johanna Blvd Arden HIIIS, MN 55112-7942 Ramsey County
Owner: Land Taxable Market Value: $241,400
Scott D Bronson Building Taxable Market Value: $444,600
Diane L Bronson Total Taxable Market Value: $686,000
Taxpayer:
Scott D Bronson Total Estimated M •
Diane L Bronson Market Value. $686,000
Tax Billing Address:
3294 Lake Johanna Blvd Base Tax: $8,434
New Brighton MN 55112-7942 Payable Tax Year: 2009
Postal City:Arden Hills Assessment Amount: $32
Tax w/Assessment: $8,466
Homestead: Yes Sec: 33
Homestead Status Desc: Full homestead Twp: 030
School District: Mounds View Range: 23
Year Built: 1991 QQ: 42 _
Torrens/Abstract:
Lot: 017
Acres: 0.42 Block:
Lot Front: 45.00 Subdivision: AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 80
Lot Depth: 402.00
Lot Size: 402X45 Property •p y Type. Residential
SALES
Purch Agr Date Signer Date Filing Date Deed Type Purchase Price CREV# CREV ID
9/29/2006 9/29/2006 4/13/2007 Warranty Deed $100,000 355162 1199478
Scott-Trustee D Bronson
Diane -Trustee L Bronson
Scott D Bronson And Diane L Bronson Joint Qualified Personal
Legal Description:AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 80 PART LYING SLY OF A LINE DESC AS BEG AT SW COR OF LOT 17 THENCE E ON S
LINE OF SD LOT A DIST OF 128 FT THENCE DEFLECTING LEFT 12 DEG 14 MIN 01 SEC TO THE NELY SHORE OF LAKE JOHANNA AND
THERE TERM OF LOT 17 AND THAT PART LYING NLY OF A LINE DESC AS COM AT THE MOST SLY COR OF LOT 18 THENCE NWLY ALONG
THE SWLY LOT LINE 60 FT TO POB THENCE NELY TO A PT ON THE SHORE OF LAKE JOHANNA DIST 30 FT NLY OF SELY COR OF SD LOT
18 AND THERE TERM OF LOT 18
CHARACTERISTICS
PID # 333023420042
Bldg Number: 1 Building Style: 1 Story Total Rooms: 10
Building Use: Single Family Residence Living Rooms:
Ground Floor Area: Stories: 1.00 Bedrooms: 3
Second Floor Area: Family Rooms: 1 -
Total Building Area: Roof Type: Kitchens:
Finished Square Footage: 2,774 sq ft Roof Cover: Bath -Full,3/4, 1/2 3.00
Foundation Size: Construction Type: Fireplaces:
Other Rooms:
Basement Area: Exterior Wall: Wood
Basement Finished: 1000 Interior Wall: Units:
Flooring Type: Units 1 Bedroom:
Garage Type:Attached Units 2 Bedroom:
http://vwvw.platresearch.com/REsearch/Base/Lib/ActionN4enuPrintModal.htm 2/10/2010
Page 2 of 2
Garage Area: 816 sq ft Air Conditioning: U-nits 3 Bedroom:
Garage Stalls: Fuel Type. Gas Units Efficiency:
Parking Spaces: Heating System: Forced Air
This information has been supplied by third parties,and where possible,verified by Plat System Services to be accurate. We do
not however, guarantee accuracy for all the information supRIied.
http://www.platresearch.com/REsearch/Base/Lib/ActionMenuPrintModal.htin 2/10/2010
Page 1 of 1
Copyright 2/10/2010 by Plat System Services
PID Report
TAX
PID # 343023240036 2 3377 Snelling Ave N, Arden Hills, MN 55112-3685 Ramsey County
Owner: Land Taxable Market Value: $482,700
Robert H Carlson Jr Building Taxable Market Value: $338,700
Gregg S Larson Total Taxable Market Value: $821,400
Taxpayer:
Robert H Carlson Jr Total Estimated Market Value: $821,400
Gregg S Larson
Tax Billing Address:
3377 Snelling Ave N Base Tax: $10,342
Arden Hills MN 55112-3685 Payable Tax Year: 2009
Postal City: Arden Hills Assessment Amount: $32
Tax w/Assessment: $10,374
Homestead: Yes Sec: 34
Homestead Status Desc: Full homestead Twp: 030
School District: Mounds View Range: 23
Year Built: 1992 QQ: 24
Torrens/Abstract:
Lot: 001
Acres: 1.91 Block:
Lot Front: Subdivision: REGISTERED LAND SURVEY 281
Lot Depth:
Lot Size: Property Type: Residential
Legal Description: REGISTERED LAND SURVEY 281 THE N 100 FT OF S 260 FT OF GOVT LOT 1 SEC 34 TN 30 RN 23&EX S 140 FT;
TRACTS B &TRACT C OF SD RLS 281
CHARACTERISTICS
PID # 343023240036
Bldg Number: 1 Building Style: 2 Story Total Rooms: 7
Building Use: Single Family Residence Living Rooms:
Ground Floor Area: Stories: 2.00 Bedrooms: 2
Second Floor Area: Family Rooms: 1
Total Building Area: Roof Type: Kitchens:
Finished Square Footage: 2,310 sq ft Roof Cover: Bath -Full,3/4, 1/2 3.00
Foundation Size: Construction Type: Fireplaces: 1
Other Rooms:
Basement Area: Exterior Wall: Wood
Basement Finished: Interior Wall: Units:
Flooring Type: .Units 1 Bedroom:
Garage Type:Attached Units 2 Bedroom:
Garage Area: 594 sq ft Air Conditioning: Units 3 Bedroom:
Garage Stalls: Fuel Type: Gas Units Efficiency:
Parking Spaces: Heating System: Forced Air
This information has been supplied by third parties, and where possible, verified by Plat System Services to be accurate. We do
not however, guarantee accuracy for all the information supplied.
http://vAww.platresearch.com/REsearch/Base/Lib/ActionMenuPrintModal.htm 2/10/2010
January 3 0, 2010
Ms. Meagan Beekman, Planner
City of Arden Hills
1245 Highway 96 West
Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112
RE: Proposed Shoreland Regulation Section 1330.031, Subd.4 -- Adjacent Lots
I am a trustee of the Trust that owns the family residence at 1569 Edgewater Avenue in
the City of Arden Hills where my mother Elizabeth Stanton lives. I am writing to comment on
and in opposi . g tion to some of the language in the proposed amendment. My specific objections
are: (1) the words "minus ten(10) feet"that would allow a shoreline setback that is less than the
average setback for existing adjacent dwellings, and(2)the words "or.more"that potentially
Y
expand the commonly understood meaning of adjacent structure.
The amendment, as drafted, seems innocuous on first reading but its effect is insidious.
The likely and almost inevitable result is that eventually all of the homes on the lakes in Arden
Hills will have setbacks no greater than the required minimum of 50 feet. That will clearly
change the character of our neighborhoods—substantially reducing backyard green space
between homes and lakes, blocking the site lines to the lakes, and resulting in increased density
. g Y
that will impact the environment.
My first objection is to the amendment language"minus ten(10) feet"that will allow a
setback that is less than.the average of the setbacks for existing adjacent dwellings. At the
meeting of the Planning Commission on November 4, 2009, the language the public was invited
to comment on did not include the concept of"minus ten(10) feet; rather, it simply said that a
structure"...shall be set back the average setback of the adjacent structures...", which is the
concept of`string line setback' used to protect site lines for existing structures. Indeed the first
time the "minus ten(10) feet" concept appears is in the City Planner's Memorandum dated
February 3, 2010 which only recently became available and so the public has not had the
opportunity to be aware of and consider this detrimental change.
The February3 rd Memorandum notes that the proposed change '
p p ange in regulation would
remove the apparent loophole that might allow additions to structures to be constructed up to the
minimum shoreline setback line. That is a good clarifying change. But reducing the average
setback by ten feet will result in lower and lower average setbacks as homeowners tryto extend
their structures so that their views to the lake are not blocked. The logical and eventual result is
that every Arden Hills shoreline home will be built to the minimum required setback. Of course,
that would negatively impact the quality of life and environment around the lakes. What started
as an apparent attempt to preserve site lines to the lake will have resulted instead in destroying
Y g
the character of the Arden Hills community.
My second objection is to the inclusion of language that could arguably increase the
manner in which the average of the setbacks for adjacent dwellings is calculated. The prior
Arden Hills language was straightforward and clear: "the average setback of the adjacent
structures" which is the string line setback, the purpose of which is to protect site lines for
existing structures. The new language is cleverly ambiguous: defining average setbacks with
g
reference to"two or more existing adjacent dwellings." It is hard to understand how more than
two buildings can be adjacent along the shoreline since adjacent is defined as meaning next door
to, sharing the same boundary, contiguous. Nonetheless the notion of"two or more existing
adjacent dwellings" opens the door for a party who is looking for a way to decrease the
calculation of"average setback."
As the Commission will recall, in Planning Case#09-022(a request for variance by the
Ranallos) heard on January 6, 2010, the petitioners attempted to reduce the string average
e
g
setback, saying in their filing papers: "we have created an average setback by g drawin a line
from the adjacent Lot 13 to the east and Lot 16 to the west, (skipping the adjacent Lot 15 to the
west)." This was clearly not permissible under the current regulation, as was pointed out at the
meeting, but would arguably be permissible if the proposed language were to be adopted. The
skipped Lot 15 is the lot of the Stanton family residence where my mother lives. The setback
calculated by skipping my mother's home would have resulted in a substantial reduction in the
required setback from the customary string line setback. My mother's view to the lake would
have been significantly impaired and from some viewpoints lost entirely.
As drafted, the proposed amendment proposed is very detrimental to the quality of life in
Arden Hills and will have long-term and irreversible effects. I encourage the Planning
Commission either to Recommend Denial or to Recommend Approval with Changes,namely
the deletion of the words "minus ten(10) feet"and the deletion of the words "or more" from the
proposed Section 1330.03, Subd.4—Adjacent Lots.
Unfortunately I do not think I will be able to attend the Planning Commission meeting on
r
February 3 d and so I request that this letter be read into the record at that meeting.
Sir_ ely yours
11
,f
Ann M Stanton
Cc: Peter Coyle, Esq.
Michael Mergens, Esq.
January 30, 20
Ms. Meagan Beekman, Planner
City of Arden Hills
1245 Highway 96 west
Arden Dills, Minnesota 55112
Re: Proposed Amendment to Setback Requirements
Dear Ms. Beekman:
I reside at 1569 Edgewater Avenue and I am writingto express m concern over the City of
p Y y
Arden Hills' proposed amendment to the Zoning Code regarding the "minus ten(10) feet"g g
proposal for shoreland setback requirements based on adjacent lots. While I hope to attend the
Public Hearing on February 3, 2009, in case I am unable to attend, please forward this
correspondence to the City Planning Commission and City Council for their consideration in
reviewing the pending variance requests.
My primary concern is that the "minus ten(10) feet" language will gradually allow new homes _
g Y
or additions to existing homes to reach the minimum shoreland setback of 50 feet. For example,
if my neighbor builds a new home 10 feet closer to the shore than my home, then my neighbor's
neighbor can build a new home even closer to the shore, and so on and so on until the homes hit
the 50 foot setback minimum. Just as importantly, I am concerned about the impact to our view
Y p
of the lake and surrounding lands if neighboring homes are allowed to be 10 feet closer to the
lake than mine.
In my neighborhood, all the existing homes, except one, are setback approximately 100 feet from
Y
the shore; more than double the general minimum requirement of 50 feet. This has created a
consistent neighborhood character of substantial green space aloe the lake and a great
g
environmental buffer between Lake Johanna and shoreland homes. If the proposed amendment
. p p
is adopted, the essential neighborhood character will gradually be destroyed. I am also
concerned on the potential impact on Lake Johanna's water quality if the buffer zone between
q Y
homes and the lake is gradually cut in half Further, the lots in my neii4hborhood are quite
narrow so there is often little room between homes. Given the closeness of the homes, allowing
an adjacent home to be built 10 feet closer to the lake will likely drastically reduce my views of
the lake and surrounding land. I am afraid that homeowners whose view is reduced b
neighboring new construction, will quickly respond with new construction of their own even
closer to the lake.
I encourage you to eliminate the "minus ten(10) feet" language from the proposed amendment
p p
to lake front setbacks based on adjacent lots and require that any new home or addition to a
dwelling be setback from the shore not less than the average shoreland setbacks for existing
adjacent dwellings.
Sincerely,
Elizabeth J. Stanton
02/02/10 TLTE 10:071 FAX FAXL4000 - 121002
February 2, 2010
Ms. Meagan Beekman, Planner
City of Arden Hills
1245 Highway 96 West
Arden Hills, Minnesota, 55112
RE: Proposed Shoreland RegulatiODSection 1.330.03, Subd.4 -- Adjacent Lots
I am writing in opposition to the proposed amendment of Section 1330. I
am especially concerned about the words"minus ten (10) feet"' which will permit a
shoreliai.e setback that is less than the average of the setbacks for existing adjacent
dwellings.
he proposed amendment will let the genie out of the bottle. Once one
homeowner takes advantage of the reduced setback-- impairing the site lines to the
lake from adjacent homes -- the neighbors with impaired views will respond in -
kind by building closer to the lake to try to recapture their lost views,thereby
reducing yet again the required setback. And so on and so on until eventually all
structures clang the entire shoreline are built to the minimum setback of 50 feet.
That will not happen.overnight, but it will inevitably happen. What a tragedy that
would be for the residents of Arden Hills, and not just for those living on the lake
but for alb residents who enjoy the green space around the City's lakes. That is
what makes Arden Dills special and it will be fast if this aznendment is passed.
As drafted, this is a very detrimental amendment with long-term and
irreversible effects. I encourage the Planning Commission to Recommend Denial.
1 Would be supportive of the amendment if the words "ininus ten(10) feet" were
deleted from the proposed Section 1330.03, Subd.4—Adjacent bats.
I am a trustee of the Trust that owns the residence at 1569 Edgewater
,Avenue in the City of Arden Hills where my mother Elizabeth Stanton resides.
Sincerely yours,
Mary Then Stanton
X?
NO
n.,
w
V:7
M.
MAS Al'
m-I
M
IMP
L PIA
M 201
M,
e
--A V i
UR
MOM
_Kg>
VIM
.. .........
vq
SWIM-,
W MI.
Am
Y2?�.'i
36
�z
U-1
M
Fg
.41
.. ............
iMS-0-og
M�
zl-
SA,
M4
I wo
WM-
5,
Mxq..
-5m
MO w
Mi
x
Y,g
M
:-�e Mm
Am
...........
�J.
...................
j
W...Mi.-
..........
...........
...........
la
%
...........
............
%raw
.. .............
54
N'
-w
N.POIN
-M-7.
T'P
x
ON
grp MR
Q31,-
Ml
N:
al'
NMW M-1'1--.�'r-
�"RI-N.
UMMI
73 1
February 1, 2010
Ms. Meagan Beekman, Planner
City of Arden Hills
1245 Highway 96 West
Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112
RE: Proposed Shoreland Regulation Section 1330.03, Subd.4-- Adjacent Lots
As a long time resident of Arden Hills who grew up on the south shore of Lake Johanna,
I would like to voice my opposition to parts of stthe proposed amendment to Section 1330
[specifically the "minus ten(10) feet" shoreline setback provision and the addition of the words
"or more" to broaden the meaning of existing adjacent dwellings that would allow new homes or
additions to be built considerably closer to the lakeshore than previously permitted. The current
requirement of basing setbacks on the average of existing adjacent dwellings has served the
neighborhood well for over fifty years and should be retained.
When the original residents of Arden Hills built their homes, and the initial setback
regulations were formulated, it was with very practical purposes in mind. The result was an ---
expansive unobstructed backyard area that was common to all shoreline residents. This allowed
homes on fairly narrow lots to enjoy a sweeping view of the lake that was not only aesthetically
pleasing but of significant importance to public safety. When you live on a lake it is essential that
residents be able to keep a watchful eye on children, teens, visitors, and each other. There were
numerous legendary occasions when watchful neighbors prevented serious lakeside disasters, by
overconfident swimmers, reckless boaters, and unsupervised children alone on docks,or walking
on thin ice. Arden Hills has a wonderful safety record and it would be shame to spoil it by
eliminating one of the primary sources of its success.
It was also common practice for neighbors to share their backyard space with others for
family or neighborhood picnics and games. It was sharing like this that created a community
spirit that encouraged families to look out for one another and seek assistance from each other
when needed. All of this could be lost and replaced with unnecessary resentments if new
residents are allowed to put their own self interest ahead of established community standards.
I urge the Planning Commission to consider the repercussions of these proposed changes,
and vote against them.
Respectfully,
Michael D. Stanton
f
Ms. Meagan Beekman, Planner
City of Arden Mills
Received
1245 Highway 96 West
Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112 City of Arden Hills
Re: Shoreland Setback Requirement Amendment
Dear Ms. Beekman:
I understand that the Planning Commission of the City or Arden Hills is considering an
amendment of the Zoning Code(proposed Section 1330.03 Subd.4)that would change the
minimum requirement for shoreline setbacks for adjacent lots. I oppose the amendment.
I have discussed this matter with several of my neighbors who, like me,are very unhappy
that you are proposing changes to setback requirements. Also,we do not understand how a matter ------
of this importance is.being considered without any real notice to the community. Residents of
Arden Hills simply do not know that a major zoning change like this is in the works. It is true that
shoreline regulations were discussed at public meetings in the fall, but those discussions did not
include proposals to reduce shoreline setback requirements.
Arden Hills residents with lake fronts are very sensitive to any changes and would much
prefer that no change take place. Let me also say that very few lake front property owners are in
Minnesota in February,so to many residents this amendment will seem like a stealth effort to push
through a major change without their being informed about it.
I am a resident of the City of Arden Hills living at.
Z
x
Christopher Stanton Date
Blank Page 1 of 1
Meagan Beekman
From: jmkahnke Omkahnke@pro-ns.net]
Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 1.24 PM
To: Meagan Beekman
Subject: Shorelne Setback
We are old,old residents(1541 Edgewater Ave.)of lake Johanna and have seen the adverse changes in the
lake.we fear that the proposed set-back in Section 1330.3,Subd.4 would have dire effects environmentally
and aesthetically.
We have watched the time-lapse shrink of rain run-off as building increased;water quality now is a terrible
problem.
And what of the view?Tunnel vision of lake from house(our much too narrow lots)?
Please protect what is left!
Mary M. Kahnke
Joseph Kahnke
2/2/2010
Meagan Beekman
From: Barbie fbarbiesheehan@a comcast.net]
Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 11:25 PM
To: Meagan Beekman
Subject: shoreline setback limits
Dear Ms.Beekman,
I am a resident of Arden Hills residing at 1294 Ingerson Road.
My primary concern is that the proposed language will eventually allow new homes(or additions to existing homes)to be
built as close as 50 feet to the shore of the lake.
I dont believe this is necessary and would affect the environmental buffering along the lake. It could also affect the view of
other homeowners who have been on the lake for a very long time.
I would encourage you to eliminate the"minus ten feet"language from the proposed amendment.
Sincerenly,
Barbara Sheehan
651/247-2400
1
Mea an Beekman
From: Erickson, Steve jserickson@bwbr.comj
Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 10-40 PM
To: Meagan Beekman
Subject: Shoreiand Ordinance
Meagan
I am writing to you and the Planning Commission to express my objection to 1 particular proposed revision to the
shoreland ordinance.
I object to the proposed change to the building setback from the ordinary high water level from 75'to 50'.The exception to
the revised setback is also flawed in my opinion.I think the first part of the exception allowing a new building or addition
to an existing building to be no closer than the average of the 2 adjacent buildings on adjacent lots is appropriate.The
second part allowing the proposed new building or addition to be lo'closer than the 2 adjacent buildings makes no sense.
If the focus of these shorland ordinance revisions is to maintain and protect both the environmental and aesthetic quality
of the lake and lake shore why encroach closer than existing structures?
Steve Erickson
3442 Siems Court
1
Mea an Beekman
From: Carol E. Stellwagen [cstellwagen a@mcleodusa.net]
Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2010 4:39 PM
To: Meagan Beekman
Subject: Planning Commission--Shoreline Setback Requirements
Dear Ms. Beekman, planner:
As a tax payer in Arden Hills by virtue of my membership in the Arden Hills Property Association.,I would like to voice my
displeasure at the revision of the Zoning Code for Shoreland Setback provision which is currently under consideration;
specifically the"minus ten(1o)feet"stipulation in the proposed amendment to Section 1330.3,Subdivision 4. I do not see
how this revision is in the best interest of the majority of the people who use the lake.
'hank you.
Carol E.Stellwagen
3o96 Ridgewood Road
Roseville,MN 55112
Dear Arden Hills Neighbors
On Wednesday, February 3rd, at 6:30 p.m. the Planning Commission
will be considering a change to the lake shoreline setback limits. The
proposed change could eventually result in new houses in Arden Hills
being built as close as 50 feet from the lake.
The change being considered will have some unfavorable and
irreversible effects. The lovely green space we have along our lakes
will be diminished — in some areas by as much as a 50% reduction.
Many of us will have our views to the lake blocked.. And there could
be environmental damage, especially to the water quality of our
lakes.
Please consider joining us in opposing these changes that will
damage our neighborhoods. If you would like to help, it would be
best if you could attend the meeting in person and voice your
opposition.
. Other ways to voice opposition would be to doing any of the following.-
Sign the attached letter or write your own (be sure to include
your address). Since the meeting is this coming Wednesday,
there is not enough time to mail a letter to the City Planner. It
would be better to fax it (651-634-5137), e-mail it
(Meagan.Beekman(c�ci.arden-hills.mn.us), or drop it off at the
office of the City Planner in City Hall (1245 West Highway 96).
• Call the office of the City Planner (651-792-7828) directly to say
that you oppose the shareland setback requirement (specifically
the "minus ten [10] feet" language in Section 1330.3, Subd 4) in
the proposed amendment to the Zoning Code.
We thank you for your consideration and support.
The Stanton Family
1569 Edgewater Avenue
Arden Hills
Ms. Meagan Beekman, Planner
City of Arden Hills
1245 Highway 96 West
Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112 -
Opposition to amendment of Shoreland Setback Requirement
I understand that the Planning Commission of the City or Arden Hills is considering an
amendment of the Zoning Code(proposed Section 1330.03 Subd. 4) that would change the
minimum requirement for shoreline setbacks for adjacent lots.
I oppose that amendment because it would reduce the average setback between adjacent
properties.
I am a resident of the City of Arden Hills living at:
5
Signature Date
Ms. Meagan Beekman, Planner
City of Arden Mills
ReceNed
1245 Highway 96 west
Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112
HillsLAty of Arden
Opposition to amendment of Shoreland Setback Requirement
I understand that the Planning Commission of the City or Arden Hills is considering an
amendment of the�Zoning Code(proposed Section 1330.03 Subd. 4) that would change the
minimum requirement for shoreline setbacks for adjacent lots.
I oppose that amendment because it would reduce the average setback between adjacent
properties.
I am a resident of the City of Arden Hills living at:
1E `7
Signature Date
Ms. Meagan Beekman, Planner
City of Arden Mills Received
1245 Highway 96 West
Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112 wit' of Arden, Hills
Opposition to amendment of Shoreland Setback Requirement
I understand that the Planning Commission of the City or Arden Hills is considering an
amendment of the-Zoning Code(proposed Section 1330.03 Subd. 4) that would change the
minimum requirement for shoreline setbacks for adjacent lots.
I oppose that amendment becaus t would reduce the average setback between adjacent
properties.
I am a resident of the City of Arden Hills living at:
xUA,AJ
-4 ---S4'nz
V t
Signature Date
Ms. Meagan Beekman, Planner
City of Arden Hills Received
1245 Highway 96 West
Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112 ty of Arden Hills
Opposition to amendment of Shoreland Setback Requirement
I understand that the Planning Commission of the City or Arden Hills is considering an
amendment of the Zoning Code (proposed Section 1330.03 Subd. 4) that would change the
minimum requirement for shoreline setbacks for adjacent lots.
I oppose that amendment because it would reduce the average setback between adjacent
properties.
I am a resident of the City of Arden Hills living at:
3315
x Z-0
Signature Date
Ms. Meagan Beekman, Planner
City of Arden Hills Received
1245 Highway 96 West
Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112
,y of Arden Hills
Opposition to amendment of Shoreland Setback Requirement
I understand that the Planning Commission of the City or Arden Hills is considering an
amendment of the Zoning Code(proposed Section 1330.03 Subd. 4) that would change the
minimum requirement for shoreline setbacks for adjacent lots.
I oppose that amendment because it would reduce the average setback between adjacent
properties.
I am a resident of the City of Arden Hills living at:
7 IC
Aqlee uJoha i'l k7 t Z31u
xC�
Signature Date
Ms. Meagan Beekman, Planner
City of Arden Hills
Received
1245 Highway 96 West
Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112 City of Arden Fillis
Opposition to amendment of Shoreland Setback Requirement
I understand that the Planning Commission of the City or Arden Hills is considering an
amendment of the Zoning Code (proposed Section 1330.03 Subd. 4) that would change the
minimum requirement for shoreline setbacks for adjacent lots.
I oppose that amendment because it would reduce the average setback between adjacent
properties.
I am a resident of the City of Arden Hills living at:
//62
t
t
f r
Signature Date
-Ms. Meagan Beekman, Planner
City of Arden Mills Recelved
1245 Highway 96 West
Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112 nty f ArdenHi
lls
Opposition to amendment of Shoreland Setback Requirement
I understand that the Planning Commission of the City or Arden Hills is considering an
amendment of the-Zoning Code (proposed Section 1330.03 Subd.4) that would change the
10
minimum requirement for shoreline setbacks for adjacent lots.
I oppose that amendment because it would reduce the average setback between adjacent
properties.
I am a resident of the City of Arden Hills living at:
X
Signature Date
Ms. Meagan Beekman, Planner
1
1
Rece"vedCity of Arden Dills
1245 Highway 96 West
Arden Hills,Minnesota 55112 y of Ardor, Flies •-- -
Opposition to amendment of Shoreland Setback Requirement
I understand that the Planning Commission of the City or Arden Mills is considering an
amendment of the Zoning Code(proposed Section 1330.03 Subd. 4) that would change the
minimum requirement for shoreline setbacks for adjacent lots.
I oppose that amendment because it would reduce the average setback between adjacent
properties.
I am a resident of the City of Arden Hills living at;
■ y J
.^a
t•
X F
Je
y.
r
s
a
Signature Date
x
Ms. Meagan Beekman, Planner
City of Arden Hills
1245 Highway 96 West
Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112
Opposition to amendment of Shoreland Setback Requirement
I understand that the Planning Commission of the City or Arden Hills is considering an
amendment of the Zoning Code (proposed Section 1330.03 Subd. 4) that would change the
minimum requirement for shoreline setbacks for adjacent lots.
I oppose that amendment because it would reduce the average setback between adjacent
properties.
I am a resident of the City of Arden Hills living at:
<f7
Signature` Date
Ms. Meagan Beekman, Planner
City of Arden Hills
1245 Highway 96 West
Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112
Opposition to amendment of Shoreland Setback Requirement
I understand that the Planning Commission of the City or Arden Hills is considering an
amendment of the Zoning Code(proposed Section 1330.03 Subd. 4) that would change the
minimum requirement for shoreline setbacks for adjacent lots.
I oppose that amendment because it would reduce the average setback between adjacent
properties. -
I am a resident of the City of Arden Hills living at:
X--711
Signature Date
FEB. 2. 2010 9:46AM 763428$448 N0, 5229 P. I -
Ns.Meagan Beekman,Planner
City of Ardeo Iilis
1245 Highway 96 West
Arde- MIU,Minnesota 55112
�st
Opposition to amendment of Shoreland Setback Requirement
1 I understand that the PlanWng Commission of the City or Arden Bills is consider' -'an
,
amendment of the-Zoning Code(proposed Section 1330.03 Subd.4)that would Change the
winignuid requirement for shoreline setbacks for adjacent lots.
1
X oppose that amendment because it would reduce the average setback between adjacent
properties.
1
i
am a resident of the City of Arden Hills living at:
7t 6-
1
i
1
��\its..,��•1��_�•1 1�. - �� � f
1 •7,-+ice+/■, • V)�
1
I
,
,
,
i
i
ID
,
1
1
1
,
Signature Date
1
,
I
,
1
1
I
,
,
Feb. 1. 2010 10:08AM I.NG No. 0153 P. 2
January 30}2010
GIs,Meagan Beekman,Planner
City of Arden Hills
1245 Highway 96 west
Arden Hills,Minnesota 55112
Subject: P
--position to 1hd Proposed Change to Shoreline Setback Requirements
a
Dear Ms.Beekman:
z
I a, m a. of the City of Arden Hills residing at:
a
writi to express m Concern over the proposed amendment to the Zoning Code for
I alga � p �' P =_ ,
shorelaad setback requirements,specifically the minus ten(10)feet language in Section 1330.3
Subd.4.
M primary conceal is that the proposed language will eventually allow new homes(or _
�p � � p .
additions to existing hones)to be built as close as 50 feet to the shore of the lake.
The current zoning has Created a consistent neighborhood character of green space and
� g g
envitonmenta.l buffer aloe the lake. If the proposed amendment is adopted,those critically
_ g p p
important characteristics will be destroyed.
�r a you to eliminate the"minus ten.(10)feet"lan age from the proposed amendment.
1 encat ag y
Sincerely,
4e�
#� .
January 30, 2010
Ms. Meagan Beekman, Planner
City of Arden Hills
1245 Highway 96 West
Arden Hills, Minnesota 55112
pP
Subject: Opposition to the Proposed Change to Shoreline Setback Requirements
.�
Dear Ms. Beekman:
I am a resident of the City of Arden Hills residing at:
I am writingto express m concern over the proposed amendment to the Zoning Code for
p Y p p
shoreland setback requirements, specifically the "minus ten(10)-feet language in Section 1330.3
Subd.4.
1VI primary concern is that the proposed language will eventually allow new homes(or
YP Y p p g
additions to existing homes) to be built as close as 50 feet to the shore of the lake.
The current zoninghas created a consistent neighborhood character of green space and
environmental buffer along the lake. If the proposed amendment is adopted, those critically
important characteristics will be destroyed.
I encourage you to eliminate the "minus ten(10) feet" language from the proposed amendment.
g Y
Sincerely,
.Janus 30,201 0
Ms. Meagan Beekman,Planner
City 0 f AM=Hills
i2-45-R- igh- Way 96 west
ArdeA Rills,Mirillesota 55112
Subject Opposition to the Proposed Ch at ge to Shoreline SctbackRequirements
Dear Ms.B-Mc Haan:
I am a resideint of the i of Arden Hi11 �
idH1g at.
I Am, writing to express mY lconcern over the
proposed arnenclxriento the Zozung Code for
shoreland setback requirements,specifically the"minus ten Feet(10) language in Section 1330.3
ubdA
prim cone is that the proposed la.MYnguage will eventually allow new homes(or
additions to existing homes to be built as dose as 5 --
� o feet to the shape of the fake.
The cWTent zoning has created a consistent nei
. . 6 ghhorhatid character of green space and
environjuental buffer aloug the take. If the proposed amendment is adopted,those e ' -
tically
important characteristics will be destroyed.
I enwour-age you to eliminate the"minus ten(10) eet"F lam g ua a g firord the proposed ameiadment.
Sincerely,
4
Fei b 24 09 1 1:37a -Lin i vers i ty of Minnesota G� 28--0428 p. 1
Jahuari�3 01 2010
MS. Meagan Beekman,Planner
City of Arden Hills
t 245 Highway 96'hest
Arden Hills,Minnesota 55112
Sub�ect: apposition to the Proposed Change to Shoreline Setback Requirements
J
Dear Ms.Beekman:
I ani a resident of the City of Arden Hills residing at:
[AM vmtlh�g to express my concern over the proposed amendment to the Zoning Code for
shoreland setback requirements, specifically the`'minus ten(10)feet language in Section 1330,3
Stibd.4.
p
My rimarY- c oneern is that the proposed language will eventually allow new homes(or
�_
additions to existing homes)to be built as close as 50 feet to the shore of the lake.
The current zoning has created a consistent neighborhood character of green space and
en+virorimental buffer along the lake. if the proposed amendment is adopted,those critically
important characteristics Nvill be destroyed.
1 encoura g e you to eliminate the``minus ten(10)feet"language from the proposed amendment.
�
Sincerely;
1
J
r
02/01/2010 MON 11! 09 FAX Mairs and Power Inc. 0001/001
S
Ms; eA�•a n Beelahan,,Planner
g
0# of Arden Hills
1.245 Highway 96 west
ArdeO Hills,Minnesota 55112
E
i.
S'
-. ion to amendment of Sho�reland Setback Requirement
- opPos�t
�}F
- -- i or Arden Hills is considering an
1 understan--d that the Planning Commission of the City
am hdnie��of the Zonr�ag bode(proposed
Section 1330,03 Subd,4)that would change the
- - ire�nent for shoreline setbacks for adjacent lots.
n�tin�n�u�n requ
7�
I 6p-,- that a�nend�nent b
- - ecausc it would reduce the average setback between adjacent
p r6pertIes.
I am a president of the pity of Arden lids living at:
\�O
1
Date
Signature
3
02/02/2010 144424 FAX 6128447202 CHURCH LOANS Q001/001
Ms.Meagan Beekman,Planner �- 661- 634-Tj3�7
City of Arden Hills
1245 highway 96 West
Arderi Bills,Minnesota 55112
Opposition to amendment of Shoreland Setback Requirement
I understand that the Planning Commission of the City or Arden Hills is considering an
amendmerif of the-Zoning Code(proposed Section 1330.03 Subd.4)that would change the
minimam requirement for shoreline setbacks for adjacent lots.
I oppose that amendment because it would reduce the average setback between adjacent
properties:
I am a resident of the City of Arden Hills living at:
x
Signature Date
Ms.Meagan Beekman,Planner
City of Arden Hills
1245 Highway 96 West -
Arden Hills, Minnesota 53112
4.3
Opposition to amendment of Sharetand Setback Requirement
I understand that the Planning Commission of the City or Arden Hills is considering an
amendment of the Zoning Code(proposed Section 1330.03 Subd.4)that would_ change the
minimum requirement for shoreline setbacks for adjacent lets.
I oppose that amendment because it would reduce the average setback between adjacent
properties. -
I am a resident of the City of Arden Hills living at:
�+J L-1 .
'x
..............
Signature � � f�j Date
I 'd LOLL 169 iS9 3WOF1 WHOZ=Oi OTOZ 10 qaj
Feb OD 10 08: 3 a iiresin Technologies 8 770 91.80 P. 1
Ms.Meagan Beekman,Planner
City of Arden Hills
1245 Highway 96''west
Arden Hills,Minnesota 55112
Opposition to amendment of Shoreland Setback Requirement
I understand that the Plannin g Commission of the City or Arden Dills is considering an
amendment of the Zoning Code(proposed Section 1330.03 Subd. 4) that would change the
minimum requirement for shoreline setbacks for adjacent lots.
I oppose that amendment because it would reduce the average setback between adjacent
properties.
I am a resident of the City of Arden Hills living at:
0
/It.(-S C
X
Signature Date
0 '103'12010 09:56 651d"-90710 ARDEN PHARMA PAGE 01101
Janus 30,201.0
GIs_ Meager Beeman,Planner
ICtYof Arden Hills
1245 Higji a�96 West
Arden Hills?Minnesota 55112
Subject: Opliosj.tion.to F �
the Proposed Change to Shoreline Setback Requirements
Dear Ms. Beekrb :
a �resldeot of the City of ArdeD.Hills resid' at: -
4..
-concern over the proposed amendment to the Zoning Code fox
�am�r�tua�to express�� F �
s ecifica l,1 the"minus ten }feet language in Sectio . 1 3 0.3
shoreland setback requirements, p Y
SuhdA
'A
that the proposed I n age will eventually allow new homes(or
1y primary concern F F �
addition toe ist r� hoy�es to be bu�.it as close as 50 feet to the shore of the lake.
g
created a consistent neighborhood hborhood character. of green space and
The current�t�t��ng his g
buffer aloe the lake. If the proposed ameodment 'is adopted,those critIcal.ly
en�riron�nen�ta.�� g �
important characteristics will be destroyed.
eliminate the"minus ten(1.0) feet"language from the proposed amendment.
� encourage you to
Sincerely,
Feb 03 10 08:34a PA
J
Ms. Meagan Beekman,Planner
City of Arden Hills
1245 Highway 96 merest
Arden Hills,Minnesota 55112
Opposition to Amendment of Shoreland Setback Requirement
I understand that the Planning Commission of the City or Arden Hills is considering an
amendment of-the-Zoning Code(proposed Section 1330,03 Subd.4)that would change the
minimum requirement for shoreline setbacks for adjacent lots,
1 oppose that amendment because it would reduce the average setback between adjacent
properties.
I am a resident of the City of Arden hills living at:
7 7il J
1, f
Signature Datc
Ms..Meagan Beekman,Planner
City of Arden Hills
1245 Highway 96 West
Arden Hills,Minnesota'55112
ry
Opposition to amendment of Shoreland Setback Requirement
1 understand that the Planning Commission of the City or Arden Hills i.s considering an-
amendment of.the-Zoning Cade(proposed Section 1330.03 Suhd.4) that would charge the
minymum requi reweut for shoreline setbacks for adjacent lots. ----
1 oppose that amendment because it would reduce the average setback between adjacent
properties. .
I am a resident of the City of Arden Hills living at:-
s
Signature Date
T d Wd8 T:Z0 0 T 0E 20 'quad F 009 T 29 T S9: *ON XUJ 3 I N I I3 STI I H N3Gdd S3WOHS3dd: WOW
Attachment
Shoreland District Ma
p
'It
,AVEN HILLS
City of Arden Hills
City Council Work Session for February 16, 2010
I
I
-
-
.
I
-
0
. a) �-
U_
I
I
C)
CD
Ci 'D
� " x
. E-
C� .j F
C� Z :
ko ,=: fn
1�i ts
a�=
---I z - o.!2
CD c 0
- C) 2-0
C3 (D C
� � - ,
0 ,c
-C W, I
U) 0
.
C) 0 J_-
C) 0 w
U) "a
c-- ci
cc ca
E E
Or
I
I
.
_0 I
.
-
c -,_",
I
-
- CU M
(D C
. L_ (u
.
....._------_.._._.._ . '. _..- ____ .. _____ _:;�S��f�7n_ ., , ��__ .- ...... __I.. . ...11................. 11
-.1-1- , ... --- -----.;:. .nr�-t-_C%:��t-t-r��,:�i,r -1_.... . .. I.. 0
............ .- - ......._.__......_,. . - __ _____________� . � . .,..Z. -
��� , _. __ ___I ;�__,.�e� ...1 � .. :..,. .� '.. - (.)
I .
....�.............- - ___ -_ ; -- --, � ..
.........I .. "', r . - -__� .. -1
-, ............. 11.."l-,I-—...I..... f -----l��,r ��" ., , i.7 -_-, � . . .
--------- '......, .........I------z----------I----'�... _... � - �z2y,j. �� I&� .�_k.
I ......... ___ ... I - . � . � c -
....L.,---, ,.-.,.. .�.................._.._....... ._... ........................- , . .._._.._ __. ., -. -.*-,�"::.i:i ..; '! . : . '.. ,>
� _ � - _� ... ..�-��.,�..:., .. .... ..- I., :-. ::;V:,� , ." ,c �;.j . : . -�k - ,
. ----V------- .I.-l". ���:.. .'.� .. .1 . I ./ . i t -71 11
.. ..-,.,�.,:;:�."",*,.,:.''�..,...:,�..:�.-. ,* �i;,J-:-J,:� �.__*'��.',L.: i � � : � : ; . -,-,T,-i _�
171 I -, .�"...,�.� :.. ----L-------- i .1... I ; .; r 1:
I__ __ - . * ...r-- . -
- " ..
.. . -.! 1 4*--z"�,\,nt-"!,:�,-� 1* � I
- b^ ; . .. � ! 1� Ial- .. . . .
.1--, ,...: a
.,....,. -1 - - I -- _lz._ �
- i . I : 1: : I . . . .%
" ._ ...ws.__. . *A - '.... .-,- I � : .
i, ___ ..1. .... '5";."0ii!-` --.-.,.7."-.--,,,--_.*-.,:;`�`:i��i..i.- ,,.....- - - .,?. . U)
. . .- .1 .�:,i� ,-.�...... __i I
, . �. -----..".*.o...,..xx.,.` ..... . �.- , , ... .
V '. .._`_:.,.._*`o. q . .
�.. : JV 3A IV ........ ...� - , ....---- .- I-._-�.*..�.._..��--�*-.-i��i�ii.'-�. ....,_"` .4
, ..%
. Cli f,=�� .. , ..., 77�7-....'ii..-.-.,�:�;`�.*�.-....."., .. ��.-. J .�(1 br�i ,4: ,
. - : ... -1 - 'A - .: a I : .� I . 1�r, ...
.; : . ..�.... �ii.:*-:��:����-.."..-�-;*..'.*.-.,���:�:-:.i'i,` .����*--.�:ii���::-::;::..�..::�.:::::.:�z:.:.,;:::,:��;.,.",:�:�..,::..-'.��., .. .-I ,.. , '*�,.�,�',Z.,...-::-����i"���:�:��i�?: , - �.-v, - t.:�
,
- , ,..-11....I I. v,-. ....-.
. � -.::..*.I—
... I . . W . i . I �_
..- .... ...1. .......l..... ..:: , ,w.�...-,:.... . .. . . : :
... . I. _.. * - .. - . .. ... ......_....l.....: .. : ; : 7 ,l �..! - . I. :..
- . L '* -, ...... .. , , : .. . . . __ .
.. . .
. �L.'_ - ...., .. :4:_.l...::. ...". "',"'"" -..I.. .. � '� V l_____Re____ ---y....�1. --__� _Wl . ,
. ..,.:.I L I.L - - .�,.,;��;,. I.? ,- .--.---
, . ...:j,.::i� --;:��:ii..�...;��!x�...*.�." L.. .. - .k" .11�_ �_4 .
,'. : .1 . .L. ...�.Ll-.:. , .. ..-..��.--*.i�i�:w_..."..�:�..- �....... , . :_::::.. . i - c
..,.... , - , , ......-..-.... I.I.,... . : I : �__.._..'lix . .
I . .�.,......' ..-I... 1�i� : m -- --- - - ..
.....�... - *."`- "-.. "- --* .,
..:_:_L:,.::...%_.. ....... .-k"X�." I .... . : :
.: -, It "'.."�`."ll.l. . I - . . . (1)
.- ...".,- ::::.�.. :-:_....Y1.......... .":-&--..�"-"i.....�;���;�:�--..."��."'�!..'�_�.��-��,..��-..��:�:�.--"..ii:�,.-.. :..,,...%.: '... `�.i-�---...-*.:�ii'. .--.-.-.�,... : q- -4f--- .../,.,.:- _- .... . I...1..
I-..::.:'.:�....'. : ,/.
_.........,:�._ :.: _:. . i.._.'."._*��.��..? . ... ,..;ii� . ".""..". ii�i; ____lK, - .%vw
1�' . "LL" .... ,.�.:..:.-... "O��m �,..... ,...-.__ I
.., , * ...* ,... -.:...-.....--.-..-.... It/.1 b
* -'�i;..,;f.
? L :;i�,*.*__�� '. 1.
..- ....
.... _ ..1,-, ::��;�e . .�.�:i�..��.' ....;�i.�--.;-".,;��-.1.�.-��...*ii.-.'.��-1.1-._�,.�� . �;ii� i::"__O,�--,`..1 _-�-��-i . : i .. : '. ...
... .1, " , '. .-... .. I-
. .- :.-. , ,�*:''� .,-.n.:� .%..... I , I ,
1,....- �"�%..:.,.",L,`:i.�.'.i.'....i;','.:,.:.,.%'.*.'.'.....' .. :.:. - - .,-. ..... ..� I .. I
t : . -*��.".*,.".,.�.'.��.,-*,..*.�.,*�.....`.::.,.-� !..'___._...`.i�..-..'--'...-'.,:������.�'.�'"-,�.�.'.'-'��'.-'�-.l___,�.11?.`.__V`.. ......L.." Nol \ i . : � , � .
,I -.... ,.. .... ....... . __ �._..,.... -11. � , t - . . ., I.. -
,
V....: .... ,.. � .
...... , ., I ft.::.., ..
,... I,...... . ...... " , � : : 1C-.�.. %� - __11 * I- . 1 ... _r_ >%
. - .1. .1 . . ..
I.... - M, . . -
.*! ::::"', � . -...:: 13: �'o ... �. ..
k I - ...�
I......1w.::. _. i-_-i�-g.-ii�,-.�,i,-...-i�-�,n,:�i-....... ............ I � t I _�''L, ! - � i lem" 1N..- -!I""7131* *.1... ,:w:W..,.
......,.:...,. --- :�'-..'�'�?._W, *?z . ..%.___..,. . I.1 � -____ . 1 .4-.-..--! ....... ...L...
_..- :��.�-'�*i:..'.-..".-.K&;'-."--- .,....,....... _'...'i . . .I--# -6-0
, � - *,- - i3�-f...iiiii:U.�,:k:Z: ; -I'l-l".'.i�..'i���,�*.��i.-..-�--. ,., Yll �?F_____ _:.=_:_.� - V, :.! . . .-
5 : ....,.": -.':',.'-.:��-�..'-.�.�...'-..�� -1--'- . ",-1
I ...:::'. -,'*�-*�����::���ii.-.:::.-�"::,...7:.,�*.:-,."..,�:;.".���;�i�:...,��:.'.--���:::������....:.�".��:.i���.".- Ria S.-..- ,�_ ;: '', ," I I-- 0 &cdi,§goQ : : -j�,t; -
.I . ,
,�..i:i� -.::.,:::::,::.:�:;.:�: .":.�.:.:.:��.,k..":.k;�-..:.:.-.f*.-.:: .-.,.-.,.*-.'-.,: ..1 a . . "�,�
... _.
.% . _:,:L:�.,___ "... .i:..':::::-.L.-..,-.-...,.-.,.:,,,;:',..'.--�..,ii..,: L...;., "' .. .,.,::;�I.`��ii : : s Q 1
1 ___.::,._.: -, ..-__ :
., ,::., 6:1. ..'...,-.1 � I 1�
: _ .*.w.'...,..:.i�-.:,.: . . . -�i��--"". .- �i`.*��:�:�:i.�.::..
7 ,.:L.::::"L...'.:: .�i,..-
_'*i'.-.L;L..:.'..';'.'. ... - -- , `i��, "ii* " -* - . L'o �� I ,
.."'" ,.:::::".�,�:�..:.:;::�::�::..*:.,..::::..;:::..,:.:::�.., vx �,�----.....`-��:
i..---���:.::--:��:�:.-*::�::-.,.."..:i�:.*-.*i�-*���.��i:�.:-.,:;7�������:�-'..-,s-�,..`.,f_:....,.,.,t...�,�t�:;iii�-' i- �.'��'�'�:i 5._l.._.?".�::.l._.,,.i.
*"
. . .- .. . . -'. . .I
I . ..,.::� w.:...�?��.. �..;:,...-.........;::.,.-...�,......,; . .l......'..' _� '�'...L..-' , ..,�� �:, . .� I . I I ; I I'/ ': .
* . 'mit �,�-.-,i.���.:�i�.-,-�,..--..,..-..3�,�.�.-�.......... ..... z .,.-.I .1 .
-%x ,� . "...".M..."....", - I" - .;.-_-.-_- , , it,7-:a�-; , I.. �� .:,:V...-,... � 11 . .
:... .. . ,� . .1.".
" ... . . ------------W . . rl�__`,/ . . 4- (.)
, : :.:,..m':.:..........: . `.,� - .%""�4``�-. , I.- -,",� ._... - !.:!! -I , - 7 - I
I .... .. ... ...... ..-���:.�:---,'--�:�?::���--.'�-.-.���.?.........-....:: x.,*..".,-� ,� w....... .1,";:.. ..l,"l.l'......*...... , ... -ill 7 -- , * N. . ����g
�t . __ ..........:�wz:��:. '.. . .-':� � ... _� �%o ... I h y i , ; , ; � i t. �� .*:ii:-.$i,:i��:!� . . ... ..
' ..-, . -��`** -
"
, .:
I
.. .1�� .1
"..--.:OM'-..*".,:.,..,f�-.-.i::�i�:,'.� - "I � �..'...'L.".... r- .1 . � . : �r---%,-. �/ � , I I� .
.
:� * - ,L'.LL.. ..-.. 1.11 ,:._......._.. i � � . : --..--.- �\ - ... . - . L ..
: � . .?,�� ..__..l......... -.. - . V, �:� I .
. . -- ---, ", -, .... -... i 1,", - ..
, .,....:..�.:�,.-..:.-..-. I.. -L -:1. : ��.i..:,.:'�.,.`..-..'"** -.1,1
- - .� .--i�__. ..:�."�i:��:;.: M.'..-��.::-.'t..'....: 11-1
I -.�..::. _:....:�_... -- " ---.. - : 'L .-.i -.:�:,.�:'i�i;:�:�:.-.,.��, . . ... .j::!fl : .:.
- _. . - ,: , .. ..... �j .... � I Ir. . - . ..i. , I .
. .�".'::.'".%.'�.:�.:�:-;:,--�i.,:..-,.. :. - - - :.j..,..'�.. - t . . *1
I .,*����-"��::�::�.'--�':��!:-*,--: . , .'. ._l_,__! i I `��
11
1.0 i �in�!)!x -."
. .- - e..�� iek.
�_.��i:;i�._."�.:j.;'L�:!�:.��....7�.. - ,��]�i . .........i:�.
I .. . ,.,-. . . .�,." !
_ _. ,,:."--'- -.*'*'�--�"�;i..-..".�-'.-..��-.'.'.'.-...:.�:.._.,.,-.'.."...* I-n .�O , I � I
. . -1: ---.,.-,-.'....*_....:.`.�.f....*:� . __ '""R I . I
. il, 0._..1.. .".....�......`..`...��..'..'.._.,....', .,-'.....-....'.'��--1� 1__...�.. ., . .;.,.L...:_i�_..*
...,., .. .. .* -.
w I .... .... ... ,,�..._: .�
..
. -, .K.. :;:i:�::::�-,i�,.l .
......
A . 5. - ..-., ";��i RF�
I '..: '..L .: . _. . ... ....".-.. . "I- - i:f-'..."�:, : : . N
� *,.":: ".-.-..........Z......- �' ��`ijj::_-�:�:::�L7� -:7�i:�:..'i�:�:�::'.,::'..-,%. I -. � .:..'.':.,�..3'If L....... . . . -- � �-:: I
- . .::....I... -� :
-- . ..:.. . I 1. -- -�
. '.L.." . I : .I . � --,�=-.,.,..,,.-__ . "..vl.�k� . %..f
.....L.,s..��....- ..�,-.I.. ,L L�..�",�,L'*.".*,.:,._L...�....... I. `'� -!i!�..,.�, .L'. .. . .- , . .: ;. I .
; ..�..._L ,.Z. ..". I.L'_ . . ,- . - - �.�,.�- - -...... ._'W.'.:�.._., .-:.q... , - - _,i__L_- w -
..
z I.,...,. . - - .- ; .:.,-..,....,.:.:.*�...... ....,,:::.I .� .... ...... . .I I:.:.,.. I . .........9 I �. ; -_-
:.� z .L'�L�:''".'--.7:-...:.;.:L, ':.. ��.,:, I �::;,.- k � �. .1� .F,.. . . .......I....... - : � .-_::
. .::. .o... . . .....I I, . ":,": I. .,..X � -- -_.-:,. � I . -
.1.,I...--..'.''-L..... , -, . --- I ?: n� . � .2-, ., I -
.. ..I I I�I.I- L.
.,�.....,,,,,*- ��;:: ... .:m.:ii:: - .. . .I.I I I-..I-_ �
.I... ...�,��`:.',':,��_�.,�-.��.M�.. �..� �l. .. �n,
.1 . ,_ -, . ; F'? .......... ..-
:� I .::L L:,L - ..,...I .... . . ---\. -. !p - I . - I ..
_ .:..-�:.....�,::,.:.:�'L,.*.::,:___...*:.�.,.._L:*X.,::.:.._*:,; I ��-..-.� .....�...,:.::.::.::.,::..":,.:.-,... . - .... I Z .:.1 �,.,f
'.....�'..�: �:�:!"_*"..::...:::":�:::�L._.�:.'.' . I I ,
L.1 I.,:.. .:�l.__.'K.*I .'L L "':::.�,. �L I m. . , -"` . .I... - : V I. - ' ' .__� .� %
...... ... . I . I .
.:::1......., . ___w__.._.....a.._..l-.....-...;-.:w...I.:..,.. .....".,��O�'.'::-..."..,�M�, --.-. - . - i [-__j _' - L : I. I .
. , ,.. . ", .L,..I ., ......, : ! - . I 1� �L .
.� I . .1 �- ". 1. .. .l..;,......�..:�.�x:'.��.',�.. -- --- .. _:, . \ .- U) a)
: �.::� I'� �-.'...��::.-.::,--.---'.',.::.�,.--.",.*...*..,-.�,...,.,.,.��...,* S>_,�_!� - - _ i
; . : : :_'. .,I- - )l , ,.< ;
, __..___.___ L..........-.-� . I , .! . i I ��
-*..........._. :: I I � L I I L -1 .151k.,-1 .- : , - . __ L
�._` .
�� .:.. ..."I .. � � .r . �____._ , , . `.."�L_$*',___ . - L -,*%
.k w*:., I,_�. ._.,`,,,- , � ... . ...... ...:.ii.'. .: % r , . W� L t
,k-.,�.'..l.`*1_,..,�,,k', .. . � . ..I.- , . .,.. //� .. - C,C"D:1 I., �. oo
. . .. "� .4.%. . . - . .. ... .I i. t. - ..
I . , ,-"-.**--- .L . -:I.:.. I. . 11 -__ - .____ .,
. .. .11.. ...�. . .... .. " - . r------3 . - -1 . .
� .,L.......I.,_ �...... .... .- - '..." . -C
I 1.-..- . . . . �.:. - _... --- .
.,,� ... .L.I�. 1.1 .: -.1.,".�.'�. I'll __/r -.-
� ,.. . ....� .,... ..." .1 ..'...'_: . ... K\ F .j f 0,�? I� w ti. , ____._._. J� _t _4 L :
.., I.......:...,:.., . .....o.... :., ... \_. I- _ , :
L
. .-I.I ... . . - . I .. I_..4 _.. - k t �- . I . t. f I I L � I 7Z.
I I ... " ..I- �.., .::. �,
:_.:�,. . _.�... _1. ... . a ,I . � ., ., " L ':,� -.k - ;
I
.... . .,I . .. I �/', f� ':I � . c ,,, .... . ., ____11� I.1 &-
. .: L � . . .1 I " ," .....- I : �,-_-b_l .---i -0--p
.-, -I I.I.. L.. I . L .I ..... : I
. . ; I - . � .
1. '::,- . - L
I.�..0..i.,I %......I.��.......... :.'.,. -11`-,,..,...., I .. ..
'. . , I. .1.I . I . :.1;i.�.. ..; ...� I , I .:
......,L.- ... I - .�-,.,- L'I L:'.'
. . ::.�.� - - .. L .I I -\gm -,\,\ I �.r : .,� .. ; -� :'L.L , .
.� I .: .:�.l ..'....L.. ���.-��..., . - I ,119Z - .. LL CU 0
.. .� .. ".- . �� .. -*., ..:-.-.-... I.- ,/ 11 __y ! - ,
.. ... . L: :.. . I. - .,M.. � '\ /I& I i t . (D
. .. `;�i;.^.�. , W.. , �> , L
i I:-_... - .. .::, -�.,-...',i:�i.-. . . __. U) .=
I _.1...::,:..:'L.' . .:�.:�-�:�7�:��i.�.:;��-:�: :��:".
. ...�. ..::-- \ I
I . .., . . , . -x. .., e _., , k ..;9
-. ! I
. I
..:... ... _ . I
. ......I....I�: :�_. �: ��.L' ,4
.1:7-.: -1 . .- � I . :
. =� ; . � I I ..:, ....- . .
: ..., .-.. . 1. I �-�-.-i�;�:.�..�;�., -" . r!-,_�j I .- - ,�,*,,*
... ..
�
. .. -.1 I . . . � y 5��i�._� , .: . 1 I,.�.L.I � I .
�..._.::,w .....: I.1: .L:'L t . , . , .:1 _�e
.,,. . I.. .I .. .*.� I I..� . . _.'�L-. . . � . .�.:, ......,.....w...,.�-.-.%.... -/ I - .
. -
L.'�;".:.L __... I..�.........I..... .. - . * .-4� ..
_x....,, . 1-4
. ....x.....�..7*- . .. �, _�
. . I.1 , .
'L ............,..I .....I... I - . . . .
-- Z.. .�..-,. .:.a�� I ! z - .. 1,
.-._..I....-.-I.I ,-��-.. iiw. 'k.,.: � !..., �1�- ; � � � g--- I
. L q
I.. ...,I. I.. . ., , w.'i;'.'�i��___��-_. I I A, I , - I-I,--I� . I -
. - * '�`_...:..`� _ L, � 4 __ -I.
..'�L''L.- .:...-,.. .,.. �
_ .� -d. - *",�-.,., ---�---,--�....... .. .
. ..�: -
. .
... : . .�, .. ::..,�_..,.�*.,,�,.L -.", ..:.. .....� .�_.- .� - � �_. -----,/ ,I� f \.1 , %;;� - -0 40
.I.I.�..... I -.-I -I�. ...I..I ... . -.;�: :.-... .� . =,
'. ,-�::i�ii��i' `� " . t .,.,�,v " ; jE:: :
:
- . ..............."_..... ,i:�:iii-.--tZ ,?.?�,,-�;�iz,-`.i.-_��ii�i�`K.*,�'.:. ;L_.--- J;��\
�1 .7.1,... _, ....... I....,......L..........."... .,- ....,� U% \1 ; i�f i-
7 I I..,.',�. _ _;,l , L �. .e, ::,. -
, .:.-:,_7'.'...-_:.�.,L.....''I .�- . :��
.I . .�..- ...,..'.'. .--.,-.'.'-,--`��_,?..�* I I (U
- ..:.: 1.1:..'.;:.L.::'.".�.�'.,.,�... ..%.- .L .:`:.F-1.I..-,L.'-."'.�:..:;��i::�::��;_.��.�.... . .1.�.::_ 1.'K.��**_. .7�. �__ - ; :1.L - - .L ..
... ., ..,-�_ .��i�: fi
:L � -.. �_- ..- .ii,..*._.i�, I I ............/�4
� . .1 % %::,�$: - . : ", ,% t i- ��...;� - . ; �. �.
. .. .�..z...:,-7."...*.'..*.:.,,::.a',...�w..7...,,.,.:..-.i..j::`";:::;:"",�-..,.,k.. . ,.:.;7:.'..'...�.%_..:.�.L.%.:.:".:..:.-;.::j_.:.- A ll .I � ,- . M..1.- .I..
.... .......�. L I ,, ,, '�._.._,�._,:�:.:-,..- .. I -*.i-...'�.'%, � 1`.iir'��'i*_.ii:�:�.._: , 4-' I z, 1.�_ : . . 'AN�- 11... � . I I . ...
. - . ,-, . ...,*i,.'�`,.,. X"::i .-...--..._..-__..--.- - C:
...I� .:,.�. .L_.____.. -��... - . % _ .- ! . .'k o 77T77;
�,.`.,.-.---'i--`---e,..,.-.-.... -1 �1_5 ....,� �:.� .X . - 61 I; __ - ___... _..- � � I. �
! .L." , ....:::..._ , .. , N""" ! ,,- t� JZ�� _-1-- . - 2!%
,
�. , ..'-, "� ..: :.:.:.:.:.:".,.:.. � .,. 11 . - � -
z .. ;:4..: .. '._...-..:.::.�.�.::�.:....:., I .. :. , _. -. '77. .. �, - : � _ li � .1 '.
.:.:�-;:.......::�.i;j:�-:.,�:.]:: :-.�:.�.��-.-,.,..-"....".,.--,'..'.��. . __ - ..- � . - : It.,:;2e; .� k3 �lz..............�_::7= -.1 f--------.---L.3
:I .-- : .. ..e....., __..Zx�� .; __.- -
.. -.a. �. - , , ,-, ..:I.. .. 4-
........_ .._....]. ... ;-,.!� , .-.."i-f '.,---._...��--.��*� �_- '!!!r,_�7 .Z�
I ....-.1 w.. _. .� ,.-,,��i�i!�- -- ,�ji.:miii�:�:w -, ,i:t�i�:`iii,i��..:i:j. , . I I.X� .,-.-
�----- . - .
.j ,- � ,�` ��.-_-.-�.`_.,��il�i:ii*�. -�i��i.,Ii�::i:�����i���:---..�:�:�,.: . *..i . - .
- _ ,::...�*.-:..�i�._.-*.,,....-...�..�....--..:-i..i.,--..-..:,.,.*, . .'............ . ..i�.'." .�.",'.-...-�'...���-k �:*l 1. V is., .
...' "'L, -..- ...1.11 ..�I... ,_,_,-, ....l� 5 --- X. . _____-, ___�,Z__._=Zz_.___ ,r--s.----- ____...0W, _-__&�*_w* . - I ..
.. ..I . I -...-.. - ____ I _Z�tr . .1
�� :-:1......:�, - ,- ...- ........ -- -...- �__.____l_. - - Ill: ----. - __.__ ----. . __:I .Z��-- i� I.......,L
�: .... - ...�,--,.; . _�l .�_,__.�._.._ :...... .I �.-.,,., ......l....'......-......I..-::� ..... --..-- �1� ..� ...
,�_ ,:-, .. ...-.. - ----- - 5 a)
,....... lZ
L . ..,.. .-. ,-,:,.... ... -...L....... ::�: -6 - .I
�. ....� :%::.,I .� :�-.�..
.� .�._,�. , - .:...w,_:'.. __�_e . �
-. ...-.. , ....1..1%.-- .. __==:�_'l-, --- -------- - - - . , �_1..
I .. .I -- I�. . ...-.. L
I � ..."..'-L'.::::.;....L...�.........Z........ ...w.._.... ... . ___._. -- - � --:.,, "O,0- I ��._--,,� - ,__.:��; Iz-1 .-
I. .-*. . - .- . ---`��. '�Ow%-J, - I
: ..........7i�........ K-.x I ,.... .. - -=-:f--J-1 l.rV - -, . I . : * : : ..- - - ..
. I - . . '-'_�_'....-.-......-"...._-...........'.. .,.-. .%...`�,..�. a .. -- ��A �1, F I .,.., .
� : :�'. I ......---- ...
: ...,. �`�"-..--'--.' :%_-..,.....,.-" 2 i � . ..�
.�_....-. ..�..::�j:,. _:.: ,:.,. -.. . ��....-.. ��� ; � . ...... C)
.'L . ..I. I ..'. ...'.._:�'......,_.......W�1,..""***i�' . . - d - _t�r . -11 . . . . . 0
� .. I. . ...i:..::i:::�*..,.,..:ii.i*....:::�:- - w"...--n-,-o......_...--...I..--- ,.. . /.-Ly , . .- -- ,.W,., .
. . . ..-:�ii��..':�:�i:iii;::.`fi.. I ___ f _____ I - �_ % !V_..., . I-
.- . - . ..... .......... - ! ...I .... . - - . , . -,.,�r - --------- VF1.- .��;_�. P 4�,, i; : , � t.. ,. . -.,._1 1, I _.
. . ..............- %-� --.'-.::7.._.:..'..'.......�:.*.". -'.-L.'-.--v-----.-,-.�.�-�-.4zz;�-;,-,=�� -,_� -;:"�'�:::--�::.�::::"..;":.,�'.':*:.,..":-::,�..:i.-.,.. ....I. --- `� -1 - _.. �
L I: --- I ....I I I *11 I____�_�__ - .___1 --t
�,� I I... .-a-,m Z=.,� ................ . - (/ ,-, I I I .
" ----..*:: . -7-1. : , %_� . .......I .
�,,�'__�,_.._..���W1:....,.,.. I I I �..I ...I .::.,�W::.�..'.., _1�0 .-I.-S-1,. . .. -:....: � , -.--1.�� i>_
. - - , L: ..-.::...... ::::. :.,:�,,.. .- _." I ____-:�, � -
. : - . - - .......l. _-AA .,�� �. � .
.�;:�:i�iiw��i:�,' ...': F;, . :.;7��:.
.- I ,*:�"..* � __"AlW%A ,�% L_
. I-I L' �''""""'.... �:.I......�. *�::�:::i'�L�!:�;:7 :::,....,�"l "'.1".... 11 . - ;Z�, : - " IPI%.Z _elf�__- _____ _�,�Afl.____ TJ'�_r�=n- __ ,J� , . 1. .... a
. . .....�_ -.. -- , .. ."', . .,.,.....$-.-.--.--. -_ __V - -� . 1, .
. ._..:S."_:'.'.:::..... ...... . I I .I ,.;,L � -..-, - ., � .
... J.... -.,.-,:., ,,..: ... I , ... ,� ,�,":,-]k m.__'�* _ .I : I
.... .1 . .. ; I .
..,. .... ..... I L I I I .:,:::::::..- i . _..i=.'��L � -I 1..:�� -,- L . .
I ,...- �.. ... I �. L L.., �.. ... �---.,...:...i::i,.:`.':.*i,.a:'..,. 6..;.. ......-*1 ........."" L � I -z � "I .:
.- .. L.L.I..I . �1.I 1, I - - _.i� q..-..I.1......-... . ...::: " .L 1,31--1 ____. ;,!!�, .l,_..,.,_- - -_�;�..:-.. " I -
I .,.�-...I.- ...,..:.-...I I.. I.,.:I:---.�:::L:�.-�::.-..L.':..��'. .. ..,........ . .. .* ... , - F " ,;�;, (D
�.......'....L' - ....... :... V V ,-- I -\ . I�--- t---_417tA- I
..:*.--.. .z.. .., . . L " 91... .----� jy�...- - - :
...:::�"'..- "'-,.-. 1,'.-----.: "I __.-'I- - ! /sll ,�,- --zz,__- .. . I �....: ---- -- -�.N'�
. , " ,
_._._...-.---.-- ..� ":m..........,.....-................ : z __,� 1- -i
....
2, S - ..�...`,..,..��i�.'...'.. ..l__...l �;:�:i,::��j,. ./ �
4,. , , � , :`_:,-,::"'�:....7,,:":,::`*`*""` �` """'," . i, ��,_� - W, : I . =--.: �1�� �l - J
I . �.. N,lz t- - ;._ .-. ji - ��-�, �:
1�t . /�, :3
-
r . �I- 1. . I ...,., .11 . �i�;.�:i�*. _�..,.."... -,__*""L :,... .l.. : .. . Z - 4 --1 4L D-11, _,� - - _�-1-L::.
. .. � L .. __�:;�:ij:��._ji:�j'" .1.., ,<, I . - 4 � .,
. . I � .- .�............l.. I ,.,-.,..-.... . � . - --...-.-.0 -. ": __ _---zl------ - _�X
1._ ... � .I... ..,......�,����::���'.�:#:�-.-:.-'*-., . . i�i:���':��]!�i��,.;;���!,�i.:':-:�:'....:�':::-�:.; X......L....7..:....-....� � I ra - .,, � .tw _* . I�'...: - *1 ."" -
.. -
��
\ .... I - �... .:...,:,.,,..1. - ; z , .;'7.S (D U)
z .., , . -..... ....... --...%,.. �..l::.:.. �,:.1 t- ,:-- ; � Il - xv . �__ - .
I .-::L � . " .......... . � - _ _^ . '- X-911,"' , -p, ", �----; : .: 'ewi: �_, %I-
:_-� ... ... r- - ..
... ....,. .1. ..:i....,"__w....."..,::.,...."- . r: .'... --.�� .1 , � r.z : .`IL...,--_
. .- - ..-- -.-..:: . ._...---%. . ..L'. .,!t , A I ,oy/ P, "' 3. -: � `1�b ...,
..- 1 . ..�.:.:;:.-.X;::-.-.;;:.,����:i�.---:�'....��:::��" ..- , . - �.._.___ -, - �::� ,X� �N .-.* .. '/ \;r_,__ll .---,.,
.
.
� ;: - .-1 I . . 4 1 - .", , I .
. -- ... ... . . - - - 'v- .
......L...*
, .. ...-...::r.- .....�.L.'... .-�w. . ,*jux,%&v,W.:\x�,c�,_ __�,._
. � j . .. .......I _.. - It ,�1-
.. I 1.I
c L . . . -- "'"_�.....'. ............ . 1. I f, I I ka-k .-...- , , F_.=z=_ - .----.- �_,.., I., :3
.. ,:X,.���l.'.'�.��::���':i:�����:�:L�.:......�....-.:: . is ......'..-.L-.�.�. :IM j L_- . .
. . _... - . ' . ......... �.�.,:�.. - ...,,�- ,,- , 'r_m . -.1 L.-
....
I .. . ..- I ...W� ...;L.'.**.'.' �' :;.::,.:: - : / -- t ,I I ,- Vn,- !:�,,-;= : -�-..- ,.:i".L ..
.. , ,�Z_ I I _A-i.:__.�?i��.,-;;... I 11-..:-,
I I
I .
n.Z�l C..re';w I � � - I --!:; .-..�_e*�!� � .
k .:.�: . . . -, A-- ,�� -r I - C- t",
w ._,..X.. :.-.,...-.,.. M.:. .w,. . . . S.. /_*.....::�� � I ,_...lv,,*'�.-, _,�; ..
....% . I......... d L -- - ..z - -.-.;::�::::��:��,-;�"i�:-�wj::i 7--- ___. ... ,N, .%
.:..;:�__....,...�..._.. �:-1. ..... -k . - ... ...'
..-�--� ....... M -P : . . t�--- --, -',jl-- �� , .� ,1. .
-,'�- -
� . .,.,�-. w._., ..-_... : :1 . ,z - - : 1; - : --- - ,_,
... I_ .,. .� ---,-i .,Q�A F-1-Mo *I .
I _.,�.1 _ _.- ............. -. 61, "/ - .
_ .l..."V.:...:.:.:...'. A -
lz ... ........_.,., ... . � . . : ::�.-- �i�l----------- -6--o
.
. I �&.-��, 6a-Lw_� .. - ,�, ,f ., . - N11
- - -�'," t f- r. . k
_:i:.-::."7::-..i:�i:i:�:-i.'.�:��:�::.::�'. . Iii ,..-�::.;:.:.... 4 . :_ / � IE i �._��." __1 :'..', t-...,.
. . /, " _.� � __:I .- ,_.". - 1.il _._L t w Z-
-,
. ..- ..., i - ; /ili � .a, . - ,\ , -Is 1: ,:�
. -,:*,-,.'....l.-,',.i;�.-,-,-�-. .:.:....I..- .. e. --.4-f_ 4?,---,,;---- 4t�,; 'L- ;� � -I � -
.:;...-...L..,.. .:..�� __ . _ , �_3 , __ _
..__ " .. ., -L..... , - . I , I -1 - ._ _ , ___ _____ 0
,... . :. . , 1 . 4
.. . . � m , - .
I ...� .j: -
.. - - , --. . ..- .. , I_.;.::�i�
. - � - .�_,e .1;p � ,- . -A.-. 4 , -.!:.:, L"
�. , : I .. _1...; // . r ..-N . :;::..I:..L- __.
. . �_ �,.. '! ,;, 3_4...� -
. ... "I -11
. .. �_ __l, "_,�,_�,I ., :_j
-; . - - t : .,...... I -N ; .;.z:
: .;� . ". ..._.: I. -. I � I . ���I -
_....- .I ��, - . . -
. .. L; : : . � . -1,(.1�.�I I -�, � �_,� x I -
�- ._1� ,�--.- .--,v '. . ...-'-' . � _,\�' ..,�--.;,- i*,
i� � q � .. "s,;:, q T, .-�".I �I - c� . * i--,y/ /-.,�, ?f .::.- 3 . . .. i . -
�..1 ...I-. I i -,�:!S-:N:k,%\� -__ ... .- t ,�� �._ - - . - � "- _____,___
.1� .- :...........� � � . ,,V'7'�,�-'A ,- ___.N .
".�L " : a-.-.! k lc- _� _
..___�_
�' .. ._.L:�_.....- I- ��j,-- ��V, -'j---�-,r�l
.L.
- . ,- .
.-;:-*...*.. .. ,, - ,� __ . _� -��.� k, -0
1� v .�-..���" R .1 7..�... � t - : . , . . - ,----., �,,,, , .�-S ;H,,* -�
�
� I . I . . - ,�_ k---::,r , , 'N _�_i - i�!i.
\ : �i _
� _
_
z ;_, �
A I . �,:
11 r 3 .,�
- 11 � , -). .. '? /./ I? ;��ii� ", � , .. co a)
A .i � _ . .
.
t . ", : 4*- 7*.;.�i, * : t ".. 11 e1j" . .�i� . '. I,____ - I - . . .i r� .1 .
\ � . I I.- -A I : t : � .w.'.�.�-- . . - _____ t f,��,.,,.-: - - - . . �. -. .�.1 -..
- : , ; k-z,.z, - - N_ I . ,s ej� , ...�:,::`:�lc::: m - � 3 z .f 11 .
- .1- i�-I � : . � - �., -�__- _-�I .�� .��,I . � .
",-,, ;?. .�L. �,. *.-.._.. I
:: :, . I _.:�,..- ... -1 - I.r r,,�__ ,\: ,�� ._... I
�..i I.- __ - . I
- : . . . " .. 7 I I Z___li: L , "'L,�..:L L:.:,L... .L ..w
.� .�L. $ �_. ,,
-1 4 1. , .� ................. ...1 � :- . I f L,S. 1�.,..,.`...-:.....
.--. ."I. .
.- ,..�::'...:...P.-' ....I . . ; :!i- __:__�', -4 �11 ,..L,L�_'..I.'L�l
"- , . NN
I. ,.__,.e . I . -, K
.;"- L�--�.-, ____�f�, ! : . . ..o _..: .__.....__ ... .... 11 . . -: ----- . :�::I-
I i��i-.., - .. -- .".3-M------..--.�ili I.�,.-.-.......�.'.L . " , , "�� !I ��' 1�. ..N.-:-,.--
. �L
. - ..".,. . . ,,_�-,,��:,
e .--.----,!- .,i�__ ----.-i 111111z��._.. %�, �,. _11�11._� _........�!.. .. , . -.I I . . ��
. ,
g,-. -- - � ;, ,V ; -., , L .L. A L? ,o-IE::-,: --- Co
,--z
,zj., , -,--, I -
i ..--- �;�!;�z..:�, - '�A'__ .. -- -
R . �,., � �--.. 3 , it c) a) -o-a
It t.;- I ,, CE I !��':..,:,L-it, - .: -4 ! _1� �.,Z
/ t . - : : : - I . . � 7& ..... h ._::;i.._'.'.__%_.:_:_ &-L-..,,!",,�V_-
I . 0 0O.." _.
I __ , . '. LtA_,�,V,,�--,-I i I I i C_j 40
- i:�ii-.. i:i�;-.-.--i�-�"E;".-.-,��i-.r-�.."".i'.�*�-.-.���;i�-.'-�:--,�:� -;�,_- ;;�f,i;�I�-I-I - _l_:
Ri . / \, . I �___ _. . -.::i:::�_.f.�:��i---.. - �. -.r -,-,- I..-I I .1
: t I - 7"�-_ ., .�;� . - ---:�i,.-...,l.�.-.-.,lR.ii i I�._...... :�,,,�:; ;'.1, - I
I ..e _.: �' --.-.. . :", ,, -- ' .. . � , �
/ / - .. ...,� .�:::ii�?.:i��i� .,�,�..��;��::�i�.....��...L..& /n. . -:.:.L:.�-_."�-7''.... -11 � i C) C: O
: -�_,_,�_- . . . ....._... I.. . � . �� , .�,�.��1�11
:. I "_ .. -: . 1.1� . � � �- " \;6 �'i lz I
. �� V
, .. . - ,1 .t�7- �1,�,__ ' '
, '
I:,.1. .. I -- ' __�
I ; -------------,-A T___aalq6m"7__ ;: _ .r t ei...� �---;...�'__ -:-- . '3� ;L, , -
�
.1 . . __ _; -1 I w P - .. L . It J ,�.,��,J -::� � �_�'Z I�L_.�.- -,l_`::: i�l
�z ------- , k. _.:E.__: I .a.. . - .--"*' -" , ... . .. I I I � ... , ,, � 1.��_ 04-
i ..; I .- -,-- -
*
-I
, - - - ... ���.,-,�-,�".::-.,�."......,.,".�. ,'., � �
� .w � - . I. - - ...� ,. .. I .;,.,-
.: L , -J-_� -."�...A,-j- . k,,.
, -
. �....... I- ...* -I O'..-1, L - . . , . :
,......... -1- w_ .. _; --f-f'I..* I !
.
,gL- -- - -_:�.,.`i�ii��i...v -.---- I....:t� � - . , Alt ,- .1,-
, .�
f., ,ii.: ... %%___1
,� - .
� ./V �.'�.�� -...-.--.-.--- ....L .,11 . C_��W;C�_:_.___f ,.Zli,NO
IF � _�; � . � I I .I ., L', ,..:.�_. L .. ..1.I . I - 0 �E
I . _ --. f,1, . -�._ . �.. *v..., I... , .
.
H i..........I - ,.-.�._ ....-....LL ....L �. ., .
...
I -. " * *J � ............... I..I_ ...::,::-L'... �;z -- -1 .,
., ,i
1 0 . T
/ V �-____ N
9 4, V.C, �i�?.� .-....... .........._.. .
ee-11111", �.� I , I i 11 I. �;�iiii �.'*__i_', ' _*-L' ' .... .;.�"-f!F /"r__� �
...*- -. I . .11.1 ,
_._.___` , �
.L I _�.,
--"'--. 2- �__ I I-. ___.:.-L I I .1;. 'f .� -&-a
:, � t 1-1 ; .--'..'.-�.-�'."-�---�-"-'*.""",-,--,"*"..*...._ � . .. " ---- ,: -W sF :f s I-
... ._.. ;. .... . I .. K--- " I - . .
. . . .... .... � .1. ------IL i�:..V�, -.:
. . , - I A�:4 1 1 . . I �I I.f..1.1-.f_,_.,.lr-
_� , : : ...-.-, k, � -
i. ..
� -,� I.'.�. . I - .''L .. .- .: _\,� �, -,
:j - ,ij,] ... .. .. � , �11 '�, t-1, `k '
.. ' ' I , ' -,'.'. .
- " I I - I .... L.. ....,. �. -'A-_.��-
Jy -I Z.- __�� - . ', .
,� , , - : I *-- . :: �. I .
. J"t: ! .../lyl. - ;. i .,...I...: ...........-."-....,-.f.....-.,...-..--.-.....-..-. O (D
�* --
/ i li^ � -- :�.!i;!i, ,
a, -E . .'.'*,'*"* ' , _, .. ........... ..... 1 ..
: . -. -"'`-,.. I I..... __ _ . .
.1...I
.. ....... _ . - 'L, - 1. _ I_.w....� ...L,.. I . / I
- - - 1. L...
. .*, _.�:%:;.' . I . - _�� ��,
. ;: ;--..-- � ... .i�;�� .... .... I I.:;s� ..L .
. ,I r- ,�,n --., ,- I.: ._..__...:-:--_:gr
--../ :� ��` ,;,:i;M::i: .-.-.-.--..--..-..---.---- S, I
- ; � . -:t. '%: .'.'L'" -__ -1...... f . ;L-J I N"k L" L_
If '.- :,f---�-!�- A ' ..: .'..*.'.-,.--,L"���-�l.'�...-.,.,..--.....",-.."'--., �. :. I '. _1�t_ - - '. � - .�" -
I... . ..- .1. -
- ;---..-.: . -- * .... . � I :.` ..�::..:-1 .-M.... . I L_-.-
,
�
, ..: :.:. . . L'i . ..__..,�_
1. .. . . . .11'.'L I f_1:5:11:11 . I.,
. ;1. . .. , I . - ..-..L. .. I I .-,.i*:...:L.. __ -- 4.�
. . : : : - X -_'...":-..,,, -. ----.--..-. --C
, ./ . : - I ; :�_ � ��.,..>-., ��M-7:--m ...... ...I... .� ...Il:..�::::":". .. .: .. .. .i�i:::�, _. I;:� . ,�,�. -1 0)
� . . . - .-.. �� ., ..
, . :. ..: -.......I...I.. . .1 I ..I �1......'.%. _.... . .-f
,..L:�,.,.."-...... . ...-L. . .1 I.
�tL:1�::.. ,. ,. ,..".. .�
..� ..I. �I..1.:_:.:..;;�...: . .I ,..-.,.. - I...,.......", I .. .,�-_. _.:�.j_:I, ", _
I . I ,1,.I..I.........I.......L...�. - .. .-I.%... ...1.. . I .� . . -*__- -_- ---
I..I L� I� .I I .
. I.I . ..
- ., .:L* . ,�,._. � -.1 -�� - *, %...."
I . '"`.....�.:.- ":�"-. �, .. .:*, ,'_.��"_w ....................I ,I!kl_ � __ I li.-'_j�,"�*-
f:�i::ff,,_..:z,:.,,:..::, �_ �1. .. .. F.��s � ..,.,.,m
. - . � . : - �"", ;�___.._."
: . - "�::�::
,
. . . . . . . . _� .�P, 47" '::' L�. :�� I
I : fi .* I � ...Rl- .�-,.��.'* . . .
t �.. . : : . : - I -;.,.. - I, rlll`ll��- U) r
� I
Er, ,,, co
. F . I . -. ... . _:�_�-__- .C.�, L-4_4-k :, ,.�ii:. ..�.'._.'�ii�_..�
" .p _� � _�_�_,_____-_"'�' ---
I . . - . _.,-.". ..L..I. ..... :. ,... :`4_-,. .. . � - :z----- - : * , , :.:.,. ,
��O�::��]: � I I��..1 1. ------------------- tk, lii.L� .......:��..... -
�- - . . . __; . .-...- 1. .1 'IN I /--.. '.�:�:`ii:�i��t�.*..i�ii�,,.......,
i I I 11 1_.- ____I- . . .-111, I . .�� �:.V.- . .,,.-...I..*.I I..--.7. �. I I � . - -IT ...._... , -
. __ � _____ - - - ..TT.�7 . .._... � �.j:LL*..... . .::* , . 11 . - . � -I ..........-, I
.11. I . _ � �L .I . ....I.I........'. ._.�
- ll t- ;�4k����ii:.�.�ii��-.,;,".-...*:�i��-.'���..-.I.,. �- I I .:..,Lu:'ZI " I, -, : ".:,'r .__:7::'i':.i:::":::�j::.:-. .......
I . __ ____ - I- . .. ,�.. ��7 r-_, . . .....� I -,. . ..--...:,,.,� :�,; ... .. ,- -&--#
. '.:L.* I., 7�. ... ,. . I: ._..L..... .d..1 I....r... ...w w.I�.... �..: -,�
L 11 � .-......I..I. ....I...1.'L . . ,ON, . ......':..��, ,��:..-i:�,��i�i����-,.�i��:��:-..'��*:7i:,
.., .I.11... - ,-
, ,, I ,,,*',",",L*;.i��:7:;:i-. -. .
---�; I:;.,., -4. .- � I . *I ,..;�%%t. :L.. - i�. -.'� - --
.I,----- ,ff/5- 1 ::: ..1...1, .. .. . ... h,
.-�'L'.�._..�.:.... _. , N7...-..;.,*.L,L"F" - I I .
I. '.., .-.. r'., � . ..., -,- . ,v- ---, . ` L ,..��Z .. ..�
,....�'..11l 1. I ...�I.. '�j�;.�'.��'**.,*.. L:::i,� :':.:-:L�': I. L .,..I.�.1, . %....:�,.,..i m.....::.�ij:7:::.�ii:�i::�i�:�:�,�:�::-.-i�:`w...'..* .
.. ._,_ . . . p.", -1 .......... ....... ...........I
.��,__�_ _ _ - -L" - '.� ... I-I . ��]:;
.. 'L.. � ____ii��:.'��: .l......p.. `. - L . ..... .1:I 'L"....'�aw.�p`.,-..*.`,�....'i�:.`�ii�':��:�:�:�:�i*::
. .4: ".... I I � . 1. ,�:��-'.--_ .._. .....:.e. I ,%.. . I S."ie.... . !K-.: .."'L .�..I_.',...L.'.L.'--.''L''..
5 . . I :1 . -, II. : �.,,�o�.-:�:�;::.�:'.. , . I .L .�i.:...; -N/Af P��$ . c
I - __ -�P, . * .1 .� ,-, � .L.,�.: .: -.wIN.__ I. -��
� _._----...---..-.--- ..--.* .- " ..;�e.
------- __.....___ _ ..........- . -I
.......--,---,-. ... I I
.
" .
!, : fe .�� -...I.*: ; L.�' �,:.�-,'-...'��;i'.';��:i��`�l�:i.... .j. - �':l<Ll:.j, ;.R& Q
.. " "1.I - �-..-------.-t�- -c
.:k A_.w I .;I
. �e...,: . .I. -.--i'"..�- '.. . i§.�;�l.
� I � . . � I . ... . -.�L..,. ,... �"... F ,_ I. ,'.-'
, , . .. I '* .I.... ...... . � - N , .-..........- ,
.I -:::':'...:::L..::.:....- ..1 , l' ,
. .�\
. ..� ...., ��-1 ,, .....
- - �. ,"� . � I I. . � ,*.':: .-
.
.
N, � li - --.,,,V t.- . .. -��' ..-. � -:_':::::�_,.,L...�Li�-`- = �.:::.. .:_ . I - .- - . _ :% ,::,: ...:,::.. I Q.
� zzv �R.,t: .. ,�% , ," ... . I � U) E
11 f k i I ,,*. 5
,
I. �14� .:�L::`':::- -. *:,*.--,.: .
I ) 'A I. � �� ..-.-.-I-.-.-- .- .-''.1 - : or I % ... �� �::
""."L"..:....* .iil...
. .._....m.:.....:,,._.L., .
--....l:.._L......... ..�... ...........-
. : F��J�'j�;';!:,\ ;, ._.'',�� -..... ... _.."..
.- ...�_w 0�
7 . I ,. I :. ..,,�:w.-�:iii�'.--.'.�.,.,�;�....�.�!�������:i��....!��i��i��;.':7�..-..'-�................i......
. ,.�I.-..-1 0-__.... '. � ..
. I. I I `_..�w ..... ,:.�,... � f- � .,"�w.....:- . _....,
.
. ..., ............... I ...... _.._. .� I�I.. ..- . "I-. ,::::"*:,.*i;���,
, - - : . I .., , __ .:-I `�_'_I *- .�'..�.........
i .. .......,......_.....-.-.-.,-..,.....-.-.-... ...:,, .......,,I.. �,:.-.. -��- :::'..7'ij:L: - -;� �--'., �_�.._'t._�'..�.L�':,.-p_.i�:�'� ,.-.:_.L_:�e.... -0 -§ a -
" 11 . .� , .....io.. .... :i�,ii.::i,:.:i*/ ._. .1�___4 - ::,. \ �
, ,
- L -____,,.. . I� ----.......... : -/,*, ,
, .".L,-.��_.��:i��::�:'��:., ,M, ,?I,_�,.�
I I . I '"'.. i ---�:i 11 _. ,. �-.!'If'.1%"
: .... L i��:��:'::���.*...'�*.-'.--.A :�:':iL*'-::;i.�. --, -
. I I.I -_ ..I.- .L.'-- . ., -.
I . ,
i ` a : � . : : ..I. !�� :::...:.- .I "'" rZ
-"' , * A. . .7. �� _�l - . ,.- - �
� :1 I VY.,".... �, ..,
i 111 I : .11 lif a
� f . �- �".-..--:. ,;..��`:..-i t� . - n .. � .� ".1 7 _..... :3.
.
. , . ,� �,.......
; . 1� .-__. .. .�l :w..... -ft I I...., . I. . .. ,.. ,..a...
i` I La� .,,L\�_ � . .�.. I
I � .1 ; E I � : . .. I- .... L.:k:::.� .�::: .,:§ ,1-� �,-�__�_..�,- ..:11 11. p, �I.. _3 I ,�. ---.... :,.:::....� I L` :3
, . . .. , �..........1 .... -.1.1. .. ., _L ' .�.,, ...:-`-.::,--...'i,..,*.*.`�.* -.I-.
� -� .., I......... t=_Z=�, L ' I -.-..--
, .- 1. ,....- _ .._Z' _ . _. F �- I., ..,.I.......�.-,...i'�._.' .,Y .,., .
,-.1 -::ii.ii�,;f e, . -.� :�. 1...I...-. .. I-...-L ,.�.-1--.."... L. - i;
1, ; � ii I� . . .. �/l ..-I.... :.1 _�c� � cu
- I � . . .:.._."-:,.. .....,.... :;. 1� :,�::_
.. I . .: "�1- I . ,-,:::��:: .. "-, , . . . LL
. I ,e" ... .11 : i��Jl..-,.";-.,Z-;:�....�,�:�-.*-----..,\-..w:.�._.::- v,_'N' A,,� . -� . : �I..
� � k r., I . ,,�i .1', ��i:i.`k'�:i�E��: ,, I I IL 11 _. U) U)
� .� t: . . ......- 1. � : . .11., -1� .. L . .-�.I.-.-.---..... I....'
w � I I � . .__.. �, ,'. �. . I , . ,
..
::: L . . 1.� .... � :: , I �.�.:...:.�.-. ,
.. I , j - � ..:�. . , 11
� �I _�l - .. .1
"AM.,.---.--.- � �-
. 5 . U L. I I 11_��/�* .L -- � - . - .... , CA
'_ 1, 5- i 1;;!�� .I ,.,,V, .. -. ...-. 4 - - -- ,. I. .:,.--I I. i:�-.�.i:.:�:i�;:,--i..,.�. .I
-L � I 4- . e,, f .�� " I I:, (1) C >,
11 * . . R I.i- I ". -.-,�*�L."', .� 7.....:. .- -\1 �.-, I �:L� - -L,)t�. � :.-j::.:-:::w�.. li
,
,v
"
< � z , .k .,,� . ,��"z. ...., .1 .
.. , - .
.% \ a !; I .. _� -_.....-, .:..... ...._.L i*.`i:��, ..� I. �::�::::;::-:�:i.
I . . - _......_..___. - ... . , I . "_.
I , , . ��.-Z.,-,�,�.,,�,. .. ......I.. .4 V E��.._'....1. . i---,.��., : L I :, 'L ._ (L) L_ 0
- -I . - ., .... I............:0 , "�\
I . ;��. w cj i � I I - .: ..L-...`L'_.,_." ...... I : . -
* .: _..". .
1, I . . ...... . .-. .... ; T...l.. I " --..-I., , I'I- . .1 I 11 .
I c- 19' it .L,..L,.- ....,iz*,,,�,- -- . . L:::L , L-�-... . ,Yl I ..I 1.- . , L��l . � zrn7r m
I . z� � .. -
.,.. . . ... .. ...I. .. I
- __ _. __ . I I.- " LLL I � - �_* . ,I;�j::� .�..�.�*L,i:. *;i ..
. ...
.�.11..-.. I L _...._._lv � . . ., -.I..' . L-- ...
._ I L L". . L �
, .,` ; . .*".1. I\\ L� ,*Vl
:: Z �..i:���:::��i��i7:�::��::�:i:����::
.
__.. ._______l , . . 0
t 7....._.____..___--- - . --,---*----4 If . I ., ,:. , I . . . el .. , _1 . .
,I .......- z 11 I I .. .:.. U)
I . .el, I - .. . .1 . - '\�. I Z
I 11 .�..:�L;/,, .l.,- I... . .I ..: �,_ 71� � ::.L.
'� � : A R[i -:*-:-.L:.. ,.'., - I - . :.qw�._..__..� __ - ,- , ,";."%::..;::. . L C (D
.. .1 :- . I ::, ":: .....L.f ..
� rf ;;L_*'.. .- r . ; #F� '. L_
. .. -j. . 1. L� "..''Ligf I
: I z..... r I I �= Co
..... ,
,
.
�,:::.:i., . � . :.:� I
.. .::..j:j - -
- ,.::: - 1.
� : � .. --------__� .
I 1, / .. A? ,,, .t 1:,.. . �.;;,���_ . . I ,;%,"i:�iii:::T:�iiii!j..,:j.,, �i:.:::i tz- co
,
-�I .- : .11 -L - ..L:: . I I ...i - _\ .,.-I, .., I L
7. L L� I�. ... i - . _: :: _f
, � z 'P ..-- . I . .. f 1� , -K" I . I '_::L:.�:.... ,.. I I 0 a)
I : 1.11 ::..-.;. . .11 .. .�N.. . * . : 1.�*,L n.:...,
I I f k1l, � .1 ...... . I m, * � , ;, '� � . ,� -I--#
. . i -11k;n-- !�_�L::,�:: .- I , .i.� . . t . N)(;._�l �,
, : / \ I" '_: -.I:.,*_:-, ,-,, �'L..I I . .. . .1 .� :�:�,--, - , , ,I,_.. z � . .:....L:;
' , I - .1 . .I."*. .�.:::::.,::i: � r 11-Ir t -1i , - 1. . . i. . ..� I .,.L
-I,.
; If , . Kl�_ :I ,. .1� I....,I-..� ::lf -11 - I .. . tl,R'- lc�77::,x : .-.-, QL
. . f.�_�:.: - t.,...- .\.. .. I .. �...:Kiii,.i: , �__ 1. - � ,.xl(�\� 1. " I ,4. .,
.. I ........
r � 11 � ,,� I � �� . - , - -r-1. . 1 .. . 0 ,Z;
. j .��::,L] I . - %...X...l.-.... :�::i�i'.� - I F - F "r., : rl .1 -Z ..
�j :,:,L,.. � � . . �- ..I I\,-.":X,\,:, .,..,.L..' ...', ,:::.
I � 1. _:i . I I I . :. - � r
I �/. - I* . I I � .-.�i;: , - .,.
.. I .Z'! L� R V!,",
,
� It � . I �.:���;�: I elll"V..`V-�.- .., L..._ . � :_ .i z . t t. � _-,%/-.-A\y- -___1 " , ,,.. ,,�. :.....,t 7:..::.� I. 1 _L
. '. . I I . L
I - /,/ I . I ....I.. I . . 'L.
� �: e . . . I - . .. . L I:l..1. � -, ..� .,�_ . I . L..I - ., .1.....-..................... ...- . L. ". >.b I.
P" ! -'r. I I 1. . : ,. . �� , .. '' .., A,� .....,.:.-, 'i-.,., I .
- .��. - :L \ , L ,:::�. ....
; t, .�,..�.I 7, I I I '.0.1k," I- . -I I . _. \ .... -.::�.,.'.i.-.-N.i,-.,..,i*..,: ...�
I
�� a 1, 'I.,,/- ,:, I.':..At. I lk �_ I I I 1. .1 L : -�:::Aff ....%�.T4�.- ! �� : ,: uf ",1-1-I � i '� ..:'._. -�, - '_ ..- . �.
I. � . .....� :::.-_.,...l,_l.:,.: , \ � _ _ . &,;� ____l . ....
. -'tl.f----Z- _. . - - _! � -1.I- .... ::L:�:..:..:.�:.::..;".::i..i:.�"::L�*...�"'i.' - ,
. . L I . 1,�L. �,_;. - ".............-.'.o .. .. .,�.-:.*
, .. "-Z! . " - �.r .4 � W 11411K L';:!-..:i".. ''':j -...- ., :�.
� -
r v A! ...- , ..,. . ." !:: ,I - 4-1 a)
i , , . - .. . �, . .. I
I : I ,...'.L*"L . , . g� -.Z _31 . . . ' ..'.._�, ..�., .� . . L.. -
!:...: , _i:�:�.' -'--`-`,`" . -
........:, L
� .�:,
-.. � �. . .., . . ._._ . �; 1,.1. I. 0 ` 1.�- .:-I............, ,:... ..�iii�,�.............l...
I : 1","',"' :': ,;� C: ,
I . ., .," I � � � L I .-,.,-
. .. I
. - I I I ., I � I I �,�,-- . - I � � 1��L f L;j:I%_,._!� ...:.. ..,:..".: . :.. CO) A
. - : - '_ _�Z T ......1'.1.� . . ......_
,,� .
I �
t -8 F,_ . �.r...i,..-._ I .: " I'B.. . I p..,i.!. -
.... . .. . I .� . �F�l ,-- I �I � � �:71:* � ��V� �...,�.,.:... ::-::1,.:.-::.::::.::j.:.j:j:�:i:.%.i.�:j:j: . .1 -
. . ; .. .'L . , ... -. ...,
.... ,. . L
�.. . � x a . -1 I Tm I- - :..... :..,.;.�: I ..
. �..,,...,.I I�9"'::_::'::.:L::":.'.':':".: - . I ; ; I 1� � �. ... "'..L.'..''. * 1. .,,l...
. � ..t " .: . . 11 . % . . . I _. I 4 i-.1 wl . ------ .. .I..-
. . . �� I,:� .; � __.__ L ..1� -.. . I I-. .1 I
I
:..L.:.�..:.-J. .. -i:1. 1.. I W, '.
I Xnr:�.:� �..:c*.,-.:: -1 ---__-, 11 r--I I, I.. -J-� � I ... ... .. I
. Z... i__�_j :....�_ -1-Iq I**11-- - j44j -
, .....L . -if j__: __�e p, ..%-1 . % mlzk�__dfl t 7��, _*__v
I � ." ""�C. _v_ .;.. "'�.:�"*f:���.'.':�...*'��i::���,::i:-'.::L......---! ., � F_ ,
L . -
. 9 111XI . ;�v . �:;�_::�:_.,::�:� w T_ - - .
� (.- ly _.. , I i :1
d � ..:.:��:*� .;.,:: .- �L, � -.." ,- I
� X:V.l: .*. L:.. . I I.., r. .l...:,..,_._ ��iii;:j�::�L� .41 � �� <
� � i . .1 .. �_� c : �-,. � -. .L.".. ... :�_4�
. :�z-:. .. ..,.,'..`.. 0_%........ �
.
.
-.
I � .I L_ . -. [: t- - I I V, I - �....... . , , _��-q- I- i�7:1�il�:�.., -
I i q I . . _- I . f?, ..,.�_�: I 1-7-- I * O o
' ... .......--.-- �,f � a_ - -
. � : ..I I ......... . ; ..� t ; I _7 ___ : . . ..... � � �� � ��:i._i�:,. ..,::;:�;� .
-.-..-,.....,;;*= --------- � .L I .. - T.,.:F.- - .
"I - . := .. . ... L....,7`�*- '--'�:�:.-��:�;-."�'i:'-"-.-,::�-���� ... ; r �_. I - - U7
1 -lz..,. . ... !v 4 -
__
-�___ A A . . _.___ :�.. .1--..".. .: - �S:i!i��, .. "I i I . . - . .:
,
1*
_� __ L 41' o��: .. .A......�z_i�::i:�iii�,-,.--.-. ... I ----i-- . f. - L.- ....
L L I L � �
. I*� �-.�:�-,:��,� .. :;jl.f I . .
. . � � :..�.�,,:::. �
......._ I �:L:;;�;l ... ... i�siijj;:�;i-tt,::.i;;� - . ..;,.: _4 �_
__ -"*-, �: . ,._...., .. ? r � 11 '� � A
. r-�� _1� , m - I . I.. j. �� ......"
. . I I ..- ,
.. I.: k>- : 11 " . . X j L
. 1: i I - __ I
i : ....... j . L . L ,4 -.�.�-�;'". - ,��3 .��i:i:: -, , ,-, ,--- � 1. .. . ::::_._ L N.� .... � ,::±".:-ii:.j* " ----
, - --.--..,.--....---.---N�, L_ .. :-."-�i'�.-."',.'.�.i�i��..- -.-- 1-
_;�l ....
--.- .
�a_nf1__f_f=._.. ': .... X -. *
. � � p!
� -, � -.--...-- - .- ..I..7.��i::�i--,....�.�:�:,,:; "., .-:-,:::;"-:.:- ill f[I r I F-� ... .
__.......,.._l.. -. ::: . .
i '.:. ... , .I......, . . x.11 . I.. - . .11. : .I,. ..-... ,
� z . � :i,5�:;�:i��;z;�'..-��' .....,...- I i 91 I-" ; ; 1.I. .� 1 4-1.4- ,�..L
I ::-i-'-.��:,.,�:-',,�;�'...'i:;:�:�:�,.-,�":�-�.:�i-'.:.:�i �.t�!I......... --i -1
I-
. ��---__ N. ... ��i ._-
. -,,-,-- _.-�, ::�::::: .J�:,��;L _ * . I LT .-
, � ` �::i i� ..,....., .. , � ... _�_ '-
, . . .j� - ,it�I�� - r -- .. . �i:, _�__ 1:�:,.�'. ....L,. ...
, \ ll�' ;LK,it-�_.�,.-.-j :�. I . I. IN .�:i_._,;�ii m I � �I.. .:� , ..1,. %..-s -4- � .�.'.�i t
.I . I :*,� :, :_ji��:�' �:.:�] � %I.-.iii:;:��i��:�:��:�i��..� :,..,.,....�--......-.�..-:::.,.., K.-.:.,.,::,"*,1..3 � F 1,ow"w, I ': I 1. . ,..L � . 1.- ,7.. 1; .f,, ,E�.1:�',t
I -, .
.. ; ,4 �.i �Hi.,-.i::;,::.;�:�:�--,.'�..i�:�:i..i:ii:...i'. . :1 � "I ... . ..� I w ..,�, -;
.r,,."-_''L- 'e
oll ... - L � � ,�*__N_ . L I� �L .. -W. -J� ,, "� -_ - - -.4.- !,-i i;-;�-!
I . _. � . .
I I : ,.;lK\
I ... L...I. ,v�
. Y - . .! ..11�jv. ,; f :-i I J ..�: �. .r k�`�' ��,
: ii/. ,'.. .,.. ,.w.:.1 .- :;� :
� ... ..D#t
. ,. . - . : I i I
1. .........., . I - I ,
... ....-.......-...-_...� . :;: L: ..I L.".., I I
:..�........-...- . , ,
.: '� . -: ......... ;E _-T I � � L: _4 _ ! . I-�Z F,ft w.
- I m � L i .v "
�l
.1 .._.. _. : .. --- I .3 .A,',�I)��'-,-: . --
: V ;�.....S" I....�_'........... _. I . I-OR 1.! I :i, _. �_ Q -, --: 7 - -]�, :: I......I....
.
; ., ... ,.�j � !�._� . .� : �...... ... .1� I - I � I c--Y �.,w&,f*0 -
. �':
.: I ...... _ - . - . _� . . " _-..._.___._._._.� _Vl :�,, �._41 .. ....-I,.-
..� -.,..:..-.-....'...- - -jt.� i, - � I I ,�,.<'L,n
.......... '.�. � . 1. r_...�:i . .
.� . ii . __ : � - � � ." I : , ,.--., - __7 ..
..
; I [.. ...- ...._......l...,..'..,.L. ,,d , ., !
. .1 ....1. . -- .
..I..,, 'A.L....� .. I �, .. __ , I I , , Z .7r,I 1_. .. .
� .1 .--- . �.1. �:..... _ - , : . I I I- I , E I `I:,�t I E_I i
.1 __.. ."-..*. i�!,1.: a - .I;
. ,
. .-
. �I . .. :�:"L..:.'...�..�.':_'.:::::::_'::�'::::::, : � -� - . - � :
. � .- _. .� ..,,::.1.. . . , I - -- I I , - -
.1� .� ..- I. . I...I..I-.:L. ;* , : . . .-..-,-.,.
P - "'. ��, %- - f
i �z , - ` _; _4 ,, -
? : I. ..:..:.:...:..:::.:.::.::. ;i i.A i --W .i : a I MW
.
: . '& ,7.-.5 w . . -.,.' ?-' - -, 11 I -, � q I ,11 4c,---- - -- E,;j-,t k-.,?
... I ,0;�K:?.�i'e�:::...:'::...'�L:..:.:t: ,�__. 1. L.L... , ,---.-r,/e,___.,� I ,
I - � V�Nxl "'- _ .....- ... ... ...I ::]:::, .I .0 �__ _�__ " ; -
..-...1.1 I.. ....l..I
.l.., .I
.. I.I.. '. * -
L L L.- -. .__.�.-I .. . I zD .- .it.., .. z _._o_. ..O�" __
� . ....I.1.... .1 t f-,- �--C;;,r i
, ��-------T_ . . I I .. . -- -. ... ------i, m .W-.* - I
_. 4�� . i _.j_�_..- . . .. 11 . .. V. ! . ---..---.- , :,,'L ,-.zf. I
\ I - ��:!;�`._._..%. ........ .`.� - Q i,�V , s" _.___ I _�I.. 1. -1 c � - --- I
* / 4.:�.!. I L.....�.,.. -... � ,, "t , . - �.C,
.� - �X� *��,:wi��,�::i�::::;i� I��_. � '-- .1-_� _._ 1. " _� �--.-.
:31 -1/ � i�i . . I - __.: -. -
. ,,,:::�:..;.
� v �., . .I ��,
�.,
�
. . I:- . a: - �,. 1:, N ,-- N" � . -
,C�==�_ I L .. .�..1. . .I.I.7�I.. � "
� ; -!� _ .�:.:�i,��:i:�$.f .:..'��!�ii i I I � .: : I 1 1
, ., -
- .
.z : \ _41�<_ 11 I- e > . .1:,* I i�1. .A'.% . I ' --,--. j, .�:�L."'� ;i�i�i��i�� .l..., � . �. " ;� 'N 1��Z,,
. .... ' .I I , .
I , . . ::::::L:, .. .� - :;* _�i� " `�- I I`-- ...I..l."... -1_.. :: -�*�;I 1-6
:� ,,/, ., , . . I. I I ". �7 ;"i: c I �.*z
..:..... L 1. .��;:.;;.z�- ..s I-�,75;c
.:.. :L'�::':'�::�jj:i�:.i;-_"._...ii�...'.' -_'-_-'- z 1�. ,_��_:z ... -_..._,%
, " 4,7.�- , ,:-'l
�0, ::� _4 I _j�::�::;�:��j��:��j�;i; �_��_��_ . .
i I: I... �.L _. ..".:�!�.� ..- .... -
.: . . ��j��ii;�..., z�,�
:, L.%..I,-L I . . : .. � �_______ll - wrl�`\ N..-, OrFam F
.. .�I,....... �.�L�,'". .:::�_i . I J,._ I -................-- ,-,.------.
, .Z:, �P_.k. :; q �-; I .�:,---
: .� I� "C � .......u_._..._-.1L'. �
L -
.
_ '. I :.I.. .. . t . , ..--
. � . 1�N -- ��-��-.�'. 11 -..:.- .k ... �. __ I,I g...r . -1 '" ON P-0.1 M1.1112ye MaN Ni�X . .
k - . �
: . ,�'!p %,.1 ,. ........1...". I li .-..--..--.-.. AT97f. .. . q .. --t -, .- -t 1-i I-.
...,I I....... %.....I � L
- " . :- 1�:... I .. . ...., .1 - " , , _. .��A A � !t�
1% 4.,,- -1 ,: � . . %�i:-..*.ii��._.:.i�ii�� .- , 'I r_..,F il; . - . . I .� .�','.� �_ , _.�
�r.:j : .",;�,.., 'Irs-ir-411 W_ii f :.....W.�.'I - I ......�.� �'... ,..,K:.7,-.: V -*., --,-- '.-.
�. - .,.. I. L'.. �� , 1: k4--`,�, -
- : ovj%j,: ......fl...A 1.�if M... Lt'.1.11.':Zl L .I. �..... _.. ...I,.. . 40, 1 .�..._... . , .-t- .1 400 1 Ll;,;.-�p i f
. -�:':ij-. , - . . .
. - ..I.L. ,. ,.:..1....L'. ,
. �. ... .. ..
t " L ,...,�11.. L �.; f, . �= 7 -. .. --;�i i � ! -,�� �.
. .:-...:.::: -.-': ..::: ::::- , ;��7 1� . -.4-
..-.
;. -,�:.*.�:�:�:;:�i�i� �14 i I I.il i
r: \. Z, �W, , �;;==� .;ili.-- ', - .:.:iw. - F --. �
� Z/.. __t k z".-. it, , ? I L 11 I. 11" I : _11� �:Z:.-.��":�,�,, ..-.r I-
-,?. 1:...."..!..,, , . . 1.:..I...-,:.:.,....,I... .,... . z L� 1� � - . . �... - -
a:L : -I ,,.1 ... _'L'.:.. I� I L, - -1 -I......-,..". _L.., . .1 I 1, - 1,;,�_� k : . . .... :��:. t; . : W r I .,��- .-,,, ;..- __,_ .-.,;..,.. :
I . 11.1 I..........'......'..�L....I 0'L- .1� .--,..-.. :4 . E k'.;f-2 i&
, ., -
'. ... ... ... : - - ,
.. ,:.::::L""'. �...I.,.1 I I - ,, : . . .
� .,. -' . , : I : : �;, "
. ",^:��. - ;,4�, k-,.:.....11 -L , � �''. / .I!- . t
. . - . .'.'�L�::,.�.%... Z 1*1 . ,�I,, _. �: : : .�. ..��� �! :_.'�. .-: � 14�,t*, ,� k. - ;$�_t&I Lt
1.. ....L. . .. .. _\�__.. ... w , , _____
..L I . - - . ! I T,.r r r,t
1."...-...I ..,...._ , 'I -F. , --�, - , - I I - �-
.1
'. 'N N �_.____� ,_: : t. �: "C , � -
. $',_ . , _\ r,___.�;�;:�� �- - - 1� -1.V, � '%�\ 1 N4,: :-,::� - - ; -,:,-,:� , ^�,, , I" ----i 2
a� � I— 1 j : A,__1 t q.k 91 �\ L_,-.-:'L - - __ - .�%,
---.....,.......... ___w T---------------------------�,__, .L..
..-.. I - A
� -, ';�, I I I f X- .� ..)1,* N
�=, I ,i�_. .- -- ��
",.
____ N't I�__ I- ., . z
3..: ;__'.�: , V-.-- I- .1 -1 .I. ,..1 I..-. .. . � ,�n I � : -N.. - r
T,,,L ., ' -- -
: :e A - __ -.Rzr,---,--- 'I"'" ,�\ � --i-i IN-I -1 - , .. � _, , _% , _._�.- C �i.1 s'S ol i=
. $ �lkl,_�,, ;�_=_- _�___";�_ :._J��:: L .LL___-L, _.� ��_ - " "S. ,
- �__l �Z' , - __l I. U
-t � :1� __ - i i-1 1� - .. fil _" .._�� ..............-_-- � ]
I - :, - - t I .Z.,..__." . � ,,� . I. I L' -.-*
�� I ; "of I .", ., _ . , , 11 . -1�, ��.
. A 1�./. . i iw; . I - -.1" ------�-.'i:7:: N N, �n - , 1-4 .� .-...,. - a�
,
.., : ��/_.��,_. -1 __��_��_- .. 1 _7��__�:�' �...... '.L.,_- za� -N-:7 . 1) ,
_ _, __ '�, 1: �, \ :I- 1, 't : i,_, .* ; K , . 1, c I-I,�j";
, : I---l-'/ 1��_I '� %*� -,�-,:---� L....,...... 1.. .- r, .. - Z:_11 . . I,L.�
,,___-, $ ,� - ..
- .� i, ... . . ;4 --"<. ..
__ .--. - ':. �; \ --;-- .?,�v..-- - I I . �,___? Z4�._�,:14,_� ... ....I - c_
. .
....- \.,�._. . . .....F= m
. .: ..-_.I ...-- - -�_:�14 ....?... I
--_�. 3:... .. * �
�z_ A.S 1 3.1%u sbaj W , U.il � ,. [-'-. , .7
- , �, -,,,, 11 Ile, , - "k, ,. ..
��:�. -, ,�., �o ..:��.� -
v: . ! . , . e ,� , -!p - ...- _�' I:...--- ; !..
--� - . I 1! .�,,� .-p-,;�o .v, -.I=-4"ii \--. -.\ ;t;�_'_-, : :i,I i:�3 i" &U L_",mZ � I __.-�N,- t E �
: z:, �// �,L V . -I __�_L_ , . ..--� K-._.l s- ,-, ,� ..
. .:: - --------3, ,
q 1;zz�:� ; . I .I- - 1_��_,_ .-,_ . ------, ___ 1; i . "
4 q; -��, i , ��,=Yj ,)!4�., - ..-..
.. , -,--.,0-- .. _1
! Yl% .A.- ..t., .e 4% .�, -, - a
), -. .,,-/.\I,
- I"z" :
� - ,; .-_... . "::_!, .1,1 . 7.- ) " -
,__.��: , .��.__ . 77=�________Z_._._ _7.-,--i�.�-.--,-�-�- ; t
-...... - .; ,'m .�.
__ . : '....... . .�... I : I - �..
�_"��,_���,-_� .f L ... : It - - �\ N;z,- . � � "'.. .-.. .:% .
..: - .... __ _,�� , , K .F ,. 1.k- -E
I ' I----: t_;� 4 Y1.5 I'� j..!,z,e Ic 1:F 1
- .
11 - --- - , - ' . : "
f __ "L,,, . - ., .- : I ,: .. I . N. * I
� -____ --_,,.;,:!i-------'- f � I 7 : � �___- -, . . i , z i -v
I �__�. 1 $ ! __ a
. � - - -��,- : I :� , . le, . � : 1�, I, . -
- - - - l__.....-..-. - ! �
..- ! . __ , � . ... .1 - ,9 f t 1-,I"
.-.I � , �;.....,__ , ., , - .._;.... 7 1.
* : . ..............__._.......:�� - .: - - ..,
.4 �Z-.,- l__..-._.-_..___... i��-;;;;;, - -. - -- -''... -r �n-:, �Z_ �._-....��... __ .. o,*.E c .
,-�r- - __;� .- I ����. . � . );�v W;;�i',3-73 _ i , ,
-
- �N r � -A!� �I __
- � *.'; � -�:�_,,,,______.__4_____��o=-- --,- '..z .. :t - __._.... . W::� - ;
;N I - Zil . _.� .m
- -- ""' . ,_ _, sf ffj-1i'l --- _Zzl� ::�: : .-_14_'"__L_4� - -
-
_ - "�k k j: z.C'� -\,\ 1__�____ �__ ___,. - - .'' 7_ -,-,-, -, L.,: : ; ,,,c.%.Z.
Z<"%k - ,� .
I\-----�l . 1�_x : -4 \ --,-,,- -,..,/-----, "i/ ..._ �n!\, 1
: �/ ,__ --
.-- ___�--��, .-Ah" , I�
'Ile 77��, - ___________
! ., -:_ ._.___�l
. ., -
. . . �4z �,_- __
I , , ,a .i;;-, 4ma
q�� - _____
.
I : - -\) I . el", _ _�_.n_ _� -,
-- _,;�-�, .-----.---- ,�� I . -,
.- 1� . ..-j - --;� /Z_ I r- � .- I�
� " , -
._� . . .:�.__ 'n--A_.P� -,-..
...
:1 / __- __Ji _..,:::��, I - `
:�� .......... . -'' .. , W. -, *'j!z z E,--S��
�-�__-.. ......-..---- __.._.___....._.._._._____... _777r._71��__--." :.
-,--l-..,-._ ___ __ __----.--- I ,..;..,I 0 f I...-
:� ...... .... _...........I.-.-..--.I.-,-..--.----..- . I....I.. ,
I .........�..............-..........,-.- -
... .L. ................�I._.l.. I I -I .L.I..1.L
0� a,--_-,'�,� *i,-,-,-_r,-I
--Z�g:s- , ,., �?
r_, -,-",i.*i.,I
, it j'...I-.11
i.-;,E-i I.;�T;::--.f.T.
S .f z�:�0.�1,
z -f i Z I.�-I--
..-
.- t s--.Ig-1.i
Zi'n=C LF 2 �li j..-.?!N.
,
0 a C, c 6 i i t-I",,,I�
,c U) u,z .I E -.T..
c:z-_5 c -.-,*1 t 1 F...-
'r E=,z 1�i &iii.--E.J.r I
a E 6-� '4Z.rfs! -
4 -i I j
,P I-I 15 45
!L .,Ir!.,!.�
MO >,Z,-z,.r s * I I
�,I��,,, I
I t c
W 1.%Z.,,s; -
E>=C 0 5 6
m=": ;f!f!!=_l. I;
.5 ,, I
I a , LL V ,-t *
"E
I 0
(o E__
�� C/D cc
*
I cl
A 4D
0 m
L . 0)C�
(D .. C3
�,�.9 C4
ja �5'd
. " �� � a W-
. .
-
r -0.E -
tm 4)
cc
��7 cl c.0
0 4Z 0 U-t E
a_s 2
. � 3 CL
! 0 (D
= . V,(n
c
� . m
ME
.."a .11.1��
�_�z__ ,
_. I -q -"
! A p , r
, , -
.: - 7
.
, � "
11
*'* 71_ ;7.4,!. 1
,
,,
,,
,, , - -
.� I ", k"
,
...1
--
- Vfl
_____ .,- *- i_F� ll:tfwl,*"�� i I
__ ,
- .
____ .
-1` �
__ .
- .
- '.
.
- .,
'I .I'....---.--. , :* I
I.
I
-
� __ t I I
.
:
:
:
I
m w
I
!
-
.1
I
i -
�
.
I§
:
k
I
I
. li
- 01 1 .2!1
5
I
-
I -
.
.