Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />The City Council of Centerville, Minnesota met in a special session on Wednesday, <br />November 05, 2008, at 6:00 p.m. in City Hall. Present were Mayor Mary Capra, Council <br />members Michelle Lakso, Linda Broussard-Vickers, Tom Lee and Jeff Paar. Also present <br />were Administrator Dallas Larson, Kurt Glaser, City Attorney and engineer Mark Statz. <br />The purpose of the meeting was to canvass the results of the election and to discuss bids <br />on the 2009 Street Improvement. <br /> <br />The Council reviewed the election count provided by the election judges for the city and <br />State General Election held on November 4, 2008. A motion was made by Council <br />member Broussard-Vickers that the Council ceritify the election results as presented, <br />which identified Mary Capra elected Mayor and Jeff Paar and Ben Fehrenbacher elected <br />to the City Council. The motion was seconded by Council member Lee, all present voted <br />in favor of the motion. Motion was declared passed. <br /> <br />The Council discussed the 2009 Street Project. It was pointed out that the bids for the <br />project came in about 15% over the estimate for the project. <br /> <br />The Council considered the possibility of delaying the award and the benefits of <br />rebidding the work early next year. Mark Statz responded that the prices of asphalt is <br />quite volatile and he cannot predict if better bids would be the result of rebidding. <br /> <br />Mark Statz reviewed the rain garden requirements for the project. It is estimated that <br />about $250,000 of costs are in the project as a result of Rice Creek Watershed District <br />requirements. Staff was asked to contact RCWD to see if some of the requirements could <br />be relaxed due to the high costs and also whether any grant funds are available to finance <br />these costs. <br /> <br />Staff suggested that the Council consider taking out watermain costs from the project and <br />having those costs paid for by the utility enterprise funds. The costs would then be <br />recouped by connection charges rather than special assessments. The benefit to the <br />homeowners is that the costs would be delayed until a later time or when needed. At the <br />same time, having the work done will make the watermain available so well failures <br />would result in connection to city services, rather than prolonging private water systems. <br /> <br />Staff was directed to provide a report for the next meeting that identifies: <br /> <br /> <br />1)Hookup charge for the watermain on Peltier Lake Drive and elsewhere where <br />no assessments were levied. <br /> <br />2)Options for extending the drop-dead date for connection to watermain. <br /> <br />3)Proposed assessment amounts for the properties to be assessed on the 2009 <br />Street Project. <br /> <br />4)Administrtive process for handling the hookup fee system for these and other <br />properties that are not currently connected to water. <br /> <br />