My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-11-24 CC Packet
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2010
>
2010-11-24 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2010 11:37:20 AM
Creation date
11/19/2010 11:37:14 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� Police liability is the second biggest liability loss cost area for LMCIT (21 percent). These <br /> costs are volatile from year to year and have been nearly as costly as land use litigation costs in <br /> recent years. The higher costs in recent years are largely due to a relatively small number of <br /> • expensive claims. Overall, the numbers of golice liability claims we see hasn't changed much. <br /> • Employment liability (14 percent) and sewer backup liability (11 percent) are also major pieces <br /> of LMCIT's liability loss costs. Except for a spike in employment liability costs in 2006 due to <br /> two specific claim situations, this area has been fairly sta.ble both in the number and the cost of <br /> claims. Sewer liability, on the other hand, is a very volatile loss area. Although loss costs <br /> have been stable in recent years, the September flooding has generated quite a few sewer <br /> backup claims for 2010. <br /> For other coverages (i.e. auto, machinery breakdown, liquor, etc.), rates will either be flat or down <br /> for the coming yeaz, reflecting the claims experience in those areas. It is because of the good loss <br /> experience in these other areas that help offset some of the increased costs for land use and police <br /> liability. <br /> Property rates are calculated to reflect average loss rates over many years. The longer-term loss <br /> pattern has on average been fairly stable and a little less than projected, which is why LMCIT was <br /> able to reduce rates 4 percent this year. However, property costs can vary significantly from one <br /> year to the next. The recent storms are a good example of this. As those claims develop, they <br /> could produce higher-than-expected property damage, which could affect rates for the future. <br /> LMCIT will continue to try and keep rates as stable as possible to avoid sudden shock increases in <br /> costs for cifies. <br /> Background on WC Rates I I <br /> • Indemnity cflsts have tracked wage inflation fairly closely. 1n addition, the frequency of work- <br /> related injuries and claims has continued to decrease and the number of claims involving ; <br /> indemnity payments has steadily declined. <br /> Medical costs continue to rise faster than wage inflation, however, and are the driving factor in <br /> workers' compensation rates. In fact, these costs are expected to increase about nine percent per <br /> year and now make up 60 percent of LMCIT's total worker's compensation loss costs. Unless and <br /> until medical costs level off, these costs will continue to put pressure on workers' compensation <br /> premium rates every year. At this point, the most important thing cities can do to help keep <br /> premium rates down is to continue reducing the number of employee injuries through good loss <br /> control, safety and return-to-work practices — it's really the best tool we have to control future <br /> premium costs. <br /> Because LMCIT takes a conservative approach to rate setting, the workers' compensation <br /> program's finances are strong. This allows LMCIT to keep rates as low as possible from year to <br /> year. The rate reduction for 2011 provides a balance between keeping rates as low as possible and <br /> maintaining LMCIT's long-term financial strength. <br /> If you have questions or comments, feel free to contact the LMCIT underwriting department at <br /> 651-281-1200 or 800-925-1122. <br /> • 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.