My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009 Audit Management Letter
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Audits
>
2009
>
2009 Audit Management Letter
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/21/2010 2:02:31 PM
Creation date
2/28/2011 11:23:49 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Centerville <br />May 19, 2010 <br />Page 7 <br />Corrected and Uncorrected Misstatements <br />Professional standards require us to accumulate all known and likely misstatements identified during the audit, other than those <br />that are trivial, and communicate them to the appropriate level of management. Management has corrected all such misstatements. <br />We proposed twojournal entries that we consider to be audit entries or corrections of management decisions. They related to the <br />following situations: <br />A material auditentry was made to record a retainage payable from a construction contract. <br />A material audit was made to record revenue received in the first sixty days of 2010. <br />We also assisted in preparing a number of year end accounting entries. These were necessary to adjust the City’s records at year <br />end to correct ending balances. The City should establish more detailed processes and procedures to reduce the total number of <br />entries in each category. The City will receive better and timelier information if the preparation of year end entries is completed <br />internally. <br />Disagreements with Management <br />For purposes of this letter, professional standards define a disagreement with management as a financial accounting, reporting, or <br />auditing matter, whether or notresolved to our satisfaction, that could be significant to the financial statements or the auditor’s <br />report. We are pleased to report that no such disagreements arose during the course of our audit. <br />Management Representations <br />We have requested certain representations from management that are included in the management representation letter dated <br />May 19, 2010. <br />Management Consultations with Other Independent Accountants <br />In some cases, management may decideto consult with other accountants about auditing and accounting matters, similar to <br />obtaining a “second opinion” on certain situations. If a consultation involves application of an accounting principle to the <br />governmental unit’s financial statements or a determination of the type of auditor’s opinion that may be expressed on those <br />statements, our professional standards require the consulting accountant to check with us to determine that the consultant has all <br />the relevant facts. To our knowledge, there were no such consultations with other accountants. <br />Other Audit Findings or Issues <br />We generally discuss a variety of matters, including the application of accounting principles and auditing standards, with <br />management each year prior to retention as the City’s auditors. However, these discussions occurred in the normal course of our <br />professional relationship and our responses were not a condition to our retention. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.